IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.483 of 2010 1. ASHOK RAI 2. RANJEET RAI 3. VIJAY RAI -------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.4.2010 This revision application has been filed against the judgment and order dated 8.12.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2009 by Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur confirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 2.6.2009 passed in Tr.No. 1547/2009 (G.R.Case No. 4229/2001) by Shri Alok Kumar Pandey, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hajipur by which petitioners have been convicted for offences under sections 341, 323, 324 and 504/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo S.I. for one month under section 341/34 IPC, S.I. for six months under section 323/34 IPC and S.I. for one year under section 324/34 IPC and S.I. for six months under section 504/34 IPC and all the sentences to run concurrently. Maximum punishment to the petitioners is of one year and they remained in custody since 23.3.2010. Both the parties quarreled on trivial 2 matter for irrigation of field, members of both the parties injured, remained together in Jail and ended all the differences. So, the period of custody undergone by the petitioners may be observed sufficient towards their sentence when sentence is only pressed by learned counsel. I agree with the submission of learned counsel. In the result, the revision application is allowed in part on the point of sentence only that is modified and minimized to the period already undergone by them. Liability of fine imposed by the trial court is also exonerated. The conviction is maintained with modification in sentence as mentioned above. Let this order be communicated to the aforesaid court below through fax at the cost of the petitioners. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)