^' \SL .^<. IN THE HIGILCOURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. NO.S£>8c:/20Q3 ^ WRIT PETITIOirUNDER ARTICLE 226/2270F CONSTITUTION OF iNDIA PETITIONER ^y ^^•^ ).y^y xs^''^^ ^/•w ^ ^.' .,^' A O- n-^ ,>•' ..^ ^ .<<;~ ^ ...^' !<7- RESPONDENTS ^e.s; ::Tr?3^^ ' *>"-^' ^ \^ .i'i€ ^fi^^ •Sf/ -^y^f'h-s ! jj >^<.u~' '^iJ '^>>'ss^.^._- - .. ^ // V^^^i',",^' Jitendra Kum.ar Khare, aged about 34 years, S/o. Late C.B.Khare, R/o.AgraMohaUa, Behind Hathi Khana, Distt. Panna(M.P.) VERSUS : 1 The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary General Administration Department Mantralay D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Superitendent Engineer Hasdeo Pariyogna Mandal Water Resources Deptt. Rampur/Korba, Distt. Korba(C.G.) 3. Smt. Kanilesh Khare, aged 52 YearsWd/o Late C.B.Khare, 4. Ku. Prachi Khare, aged 25 yrs. D/o Late C.B.Khare 5. Ku. Ruchi Khare, aged 23 yrs D/o Late C.B.Khare 6. Ku. Priyanka Khare, aged 19 yrs. D/o Late C.B.Khare No. 3 to 6 R/o.Agra Mohalla, .-_1 ,^. II 2 II Behind Hathi Khana, Distt. Panna(M.P.) 7. Smt. Jaya Khare, Aged 30 Yrs. W/o Ravi Khare R/o Near Gadi, Alipura, Navgaon, Distt. Chhaterpur (M.P.) 8. Smt. Jeevani Shrivastav, W/o Balram Shrivastava R/o Irrigation Departruent Colony, Near New Tahsil, Sagar (M.P.) 9. Javendra Khare, Aged 27 Yrs. S/o Late C.B.Khare, R/o Agra Mohalla, Behind Hathi Khana, Distt. Panna (M.P.) 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER /!• HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH s BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. Petitiouer Respondents WRIT PETITION N0.3980 OP 2003 Jitendra Kumar Khare <£) versus The State of ChItattisKarh and others Present : Mrs. Anita Shrivastava, couasel for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Panel Lawyer for respon&ents No. 1 aad 2. None for respoudents No.3 to 9. ORAL ORDER (20th April, 2006) The oetitioner's father Sbri Chaturbhui Khare died on 14-8-2002 iu hamess wlule workiag as Sub-Division.al Officer, Gramin Yantriki Seva, Sub-Division Podi Uproda at Korba. Leanaed couiisel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed aa applicatiou for conipassionate appoiatment on 18-10-2002 (Annexure P/2), but tiU date, his case for couipassionate appoiutinent has not been decided. 2. The Govemiiient of Chhattisgarh, bv its circular dated 2- 2-2006, has dirccted aU ttie departments to consider cases ofaUfhe eligible dependaat-legal tieir of the einplovees, who died in hamess between 1-11-1997 to 31-10-2000 for coinpassionate appointment. z.— SSsWv<-»s, 3. Accordiagly, fhe Govenunent of Chhattisgarh is directed to coiisider the case of ftie petitioner as per its own circular dated 2- 2-2006 and also m view offhe order dated 20-12-2005 passed by this Court ia Writ Petition No. 1322/2002 aad other connected niatters oa its own merit, in accordance wifh. law, on such representation beia^ ffled by the petitioner. For the reasons stated above, fhe writ petition. stands of. No order as to costs. Certi&ed copy as per niles. Satish K. AgruJiotri Judge ^^ts^. ei¥3;Sts»l'