((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.68 OF 2009 Devidas Mahadeo Hirode Applicant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Aniket Vagal for applicant. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 04th February 2009 PC : 1. The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 259 of the Indian Penal Code. The substantive Sentence is three years of rigorous imprisonment. The applicant has been directed to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant was on bail throughout the trial. He stated that the fine amount will be deposited immediately. I have heard learned APP appearing for the State. ((-2-)) 3. The applicant was enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial. The substantive sentence is of three years of rigorous imprisonment. The appeal is not likely to be heard before expiry of the period of sentence. There are no extraordinary reasons to deny the bail to the applicant. 4. Hence, I pass following order :- (a) The applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during pendency of the trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within a period of four weeks from today; (b) The order granting bail shall be given effect only after the fine amount is deposited by the applicant. (A.S.OKA, J.)