IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8861 of 2010 ROUSHAN YADAV, SON OF UPENDER YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15/03/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion by adding the trial No. pertaining to the said case since the trial has begun and two witnesses have already been examined in the said trial. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently, certain witnesses named the petitioner as having been seen in the vicinity on a motorcycle but when the Informant and his accompanying witness were examined during trial, they did not identify the petitioner. Under the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 16.9.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. Chandra, Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2004, G.R. No. 664 of 2004, Tr. No. 403 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he - 2 - will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)