IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO: 451 OF 2006 (S/S) Neeraj Kumar Mittal, S/o Sri Suraj Kumar Mittal, R/o House NO. 252 East Deendayal, Roorkee. -----Petitioner Versus 1- Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam through Secretary, Dehradun. 2- Managing Director, Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam Mohini Dehradun. 3- The Chairman State Advisory Committee, Gate No.31, Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 4 U.P. Jal Nigam through its Managing Director, 6 Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow. -----Respondents Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for petitioner. Standing Counsel for respondents. Dated : March 30, 2006 HON’BLE RAJESH TANDON, J. Heard Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Standing counsel for the respondents. Both the parties have submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of at the admission stage. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents No.1 and 2 to allocate the petitioner under Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam with all consequential benefits. Briefly stated, the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Draughtsman on 21.06.1981 in the Project Division U.P. Jal Nigam, Roorkee. Pursuant to the Hill Sub Cadra Rules, 1992, options were invited for a separate Hill Cadre through U.P. Jal Nigam vide circular dated 12.01.1993 and 20.1.1993. However, the petitioner has confined his prayer for the disposal of the representation filed on 06.03.2003. Liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh representation with regard to his prayer for allocation in Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam in the light of the orders dated 13.12.1999, 06.03.2003 and 28.12.2005, Annexure No.12,13 and 14 to the writ petition. The representation filed by the petitioner shall be disposed of by the Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam within a period of one week from the date of production of certified copy of the order. Subject to aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J) 30.03.2006. Negi.