IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43505 of 2009 BHARAT KUMAR ROY @ BHARAT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation of theft (loot) is ornamental due to previous land dispute with co-villager and assault of Lathi though makes out no case under section 307 IPC but that also is upon co-accused who has already been allowed bail by the lower court itself. In the facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Baheri P.S.Case No. 113/03, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)