Crl.M.No.M-9601 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-9601 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 31, 2010 Lalita and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Parties in person with Mr.Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent no. 5. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Panipat, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 27.3.2010, Annexure P8, already made to him by the petitioners. As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Lalita, as per copy of Board of School Education Certificate Haryana, Annexure P1, is 3.3.1992, and date of birth of petitioner No.2- Tinku Tomar, as per copy of driving licence, Annexure P2, is 8.6.1987. They got married on 27.3.2010, as per marriage certificate, Annexure P5. Photographs of the marriage are Annexures P6 and P7. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, Crl.M.No.M-9601 of 2010 (O&M) -2- i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 27.3.2010, Annexure P8, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. 31.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge