HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1970 of 2009 (M/S) Tellu Ram Saini & others …. Petitioners .. Versus Additional Education Director & others … Respondents Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. Mr. A.V. Pundir, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 3rd December, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. This writ petition has now become infructuous in as much as the only grievance of the petitioners is that though they are validly elected members of the Society, yet they were denied their right to vote in the elections of the present management committee. However, since the elections of new management committee have already taken place and new management committee has been elected, no interference is called for at this stage. The petitioners in any case are free to agitate their grievance before any authority, including the Deputy Registrar, Firms Societies and Chits, Haridwar, if such a remedy is provided to them under the law. According to the petitioners the validity of the members of the society can only be decided by the Deputy Registrar, Firms Societies and Chits and not by the education authorities and as such they may file the necessary application before the said authority i.e. the Deputy Registrar, Firms Societies and Chits, Haridwar who will look into the matter independently in accordance with law. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 3.12.2009 Avneet (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)