-1- bpk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 371 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 236 OF 2007 Gubbir Singh : Plaintiff v/s Google India Pvt. Ltd. : Defendant Mr. N.H. Seervai sr. counsel with Mr. Y.R. Shah for plaintiff None for defendant. Coram : S.J. Kathawalla, J. Date : 6.10.2008 P.C. . In this Notice of Motion, the plaintiff, after serving notice to the defendant, had on 15.1.2007 made an application before this court (Coram: D.K. Deshmukh, J.) for ad ad-interim reliefs,when none appeared for the defendant. Ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayers (a) and (b) were granted to the plaintiff. . Thereafter the plaintiff once again on 29.1.2007 served the notice of motion on the defendant. The endorsement of the defendant having accepted the service on 29.1.2007 is found on the docket of the notice of motion. Though the written statement filed by the defendant on 30.5.2008 is on record, the defendant have not chosen to file any -2- affidavit in reply to the notice of motion. . On 5th September 2008 when the Notice of Motion was called out before this court (Coram :P.R. Borkar,J.) none appeared for the defendant. However the matter was adjourned for a period of two weeks, on an application made on behalf of the plaintiff. . Today, once again when the notice of Motion is called out for final hearing the defendant is absent. It appears that the defendant is not interested in contesting the notice of motion. In view thereof the ad-interim order in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the notice of motion passed by this court on 15.1.2007 stands confirmed. . Notice of motion is therefore made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the Notice of Motion. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.)