C. Review No. 28/2009 08.07.2010 Present: Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A. G. for the respondents Petitioner in the present case is stated to have obtained permission under Rule 4(4)(b) of the Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1986. Be that as it may be, main petition had to be adjudicated as a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. Consequently, no case for review is made out. 3. In any event, liberty was afforded to the members of the petitioner’s Association to approach the Court and also informed the Government of their entitlement for the benefits accrued to them pursuant to the decision rendered by this Court in CWP No. 415/2000 titled as Baldev Singh & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. July 08, 2010 (rana)