IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4926 of 2008 Decided on: 01.09.2010 _______________________________________________________________________ Ashok Kumar …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though his case was considered for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant (Accounts) by the Departmental Promotion Committee, however, taking into consideration the entries made in the ACRs for the period w.e.f. 1990-91 to 1994-95, he was found unfit for promotion. Petitioner has already made a representation against the entries made in the ACRs for the period w.e.f. 1990-91 to 1994-95, however, the same has not been decided by the Board of Dorectors till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case, the entries made in the ACRs of the petitioner for the period w.e.f. 1990-91 to 1994-95 are expunged, the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- consequences shall ensure. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge september 1, 2010 (K. Attri)