IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19442 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 29, 2010. Gurpreet Singh Sidhu .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is stated to be a practising lawyer in the District Courts at Moga. He seeks a mandamus to direct the Deputy Commissioner, Moga to consider his claim for allotment of chamber in the District Courts Complex at Moga in terms of the policy decision dated 11.11.2002 (Annexure P-3). The petitioner in this regard has already represented the authorities on 1.6.2010 (Annexure P-13) as well as on 10.9.2010 (Annexure P-17) but without any response thereto. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on the entitlement of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Moga to consider the petitioner's claim in terms of the C.W.P.No .19442 of 2010 2 afore-mentioned policy decision but after getting prior approval from the learned District and Sessions Judge, Faridkot. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 29, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE