HIGH COURT OF CHMAniSGARHAT BILASPOR Writ PetitionNo. 2387 of 2006 Petitioner Pyare Lal Pandey fiQed • 48 years, Swi of Shri P.N. Pandey Postedas- L.D.T., At - S.S. Katibadi Hr. Sec. School, Katibadt, Raipur, Distrtet - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H. No. 38, Near Shiv MancUr, S.B.I. Colony, Sunder Nagar, Raipur Distrid- Raipur (C.G.) :s- Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhatti^arh Through- The Secr^iy, School Blucatton Depaitaent, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Rajpur 2 The Directew, PubKc Instructions, Chhattisgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. 3 The Governing Body of Kallbadi Shifesha Samiti, Through-its School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi. Rayur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 Cff THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Justice Shri SaUsh K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharaani, Advocate for the pefifioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for tha respondents No. 1 and 2/Stete. ORDER (Passed on this 16tndayofApril,2007) The qu^tion of taw involved herein is whetfier the non-teachjng staff working in Govemment aidsd school are enUted to ttie benefit <rf recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission under the provisions of ttie Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adh^pakon Tattia fisya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (hencaforth <the Adhiniyam, 1978") and the rules made thereunder read witti the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1988 ftienceftwth "tte Pay Rutes, 1988'). "^ IP" Learned counsel appearing for th®peUfioner subratts that the tenns and conditions of the teaching and non-teaching staff are governed by the same provisions of law which were under consideration by this Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Ghhalfisgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2WS), wherein t^ the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court held thrt the pefitioneis who are worlang in (ully Govemment aided private schools are entiUed to fte revised pay-seales with effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of payment of arrears had granted certain direction. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by th®parBes that this matter te squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 pa»edby this Court in the case of Smt. A. Lall vs. Stete of Chhattisgaih and attwr connected mattere (Supra). As a result, fbr the reasons stated in the jut^ment and order dated e.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other conneded matter^ (Supra), the writ petition is allowed in the same terms and condiUons. "I,.rs^*'ot" s<^^ Thal