IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.137 of 2007 1. The State of Bihar through Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar,Patna. 2. The Chairman, District Establishment Committee-cum-District Magistrate, Buxar. 3. The District Welfare Officer, Buxar. 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Buxar. 5. Circle Officer, Buxar. ……Respondents-Petitioners Versus 1. Ramesh Prasad, son of late Ram Nath Prasad, resident of village Sohanipatti, Ward No. 14, P.S. Buxar(Town),District Buxar. 2. Jag Narayan Prasad, son of Brij Nath Prasad, resident of village Naya Bazar, Mathia, Ward No.3, P.S. Buxar(Town),District Buxar ……Petitioners-Respondents. 3. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna Proforma Respondent-Respondent. . ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : None. ---------- 06/ 20.01.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition has been filed for review of order dated 12.02.2007, by which a Bench of this Court allowed C.W.J.C. No. 10432 of 2005 filed by respondents no.1 and 2 and quashed the order of the authorities rejecting the caste certificates of Kharwar being given to them. The order under review has been passed after due consideration of all the facts and circumstances of the case including the admitted fact that the fathers of respondents no. 1 and 2, who were petitioners in the said writ petition, were given caste certificates of Kharwar, which had never been cancelled and father of respondent no. 2 is continuing in Government service on the basis of the said certificate. In the said circumstances, this Court in the said order had rightly come to the conclusion that the son of Kharwar cannot be, but a Kharwar - 2 - and hence the caste certificates of Kharwar given to respondents no. 1 and 2, can not be legally cancelled. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor does it find any fresh material to take a different view nor is there any other reason to differ with the view taken by the said Court in the order under review. Accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )