1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3117 OF 2008 (Smt. Meena Deo Ajmeria w/o Deo Kumar Ajmeria vs. Smt. Netadevi Savadia w/o Rajesh Kumar & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 08, 2008. Heard Shri Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the petitioner – plaintiff. The challenge to the orders dated 30.1.2006 and 12.06.2007 is only because of later order dated 29.10.2007. The order dated 29.10.2007 has been passed on an application moved for appointment of Receiver to collect rent because of earlier orders dated 30.1.2006 and 12.6.2007. Therefore, challenge to these two orders in present writ petition is misconceived. Insofar as order dated 29.10.2007 is concerned, the defence of respondents is that they have inherited particular property because of Will. The issue, therefore, needs to be decided on merits. I find that lower Court has while considering the application has given valid reasons. However, I am considering the challenge to order in present writ petition. I am not inclined to interfere at this stage. 2 Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge these three orders, if necessary, after final adjudication in Civil Suit. JUDGE *GS.