)•) ±. SINGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH // Writ Petftion Nor^S58of 2005 PETITIONER: ^ ^Ratpal Ram Patel, S/o Late Ram Prasad Patel, ^ ^.^f v S/o Late Ram Prasad ^\P>^^'.... Aged about 59 years, A ^if^^' ^ Head Master, Govern .- '^^'...•"" / "^^- .^^>y "<,^>? 'y f'lESPONDENTS: Head Master, Government Middle School, Silli, Tehsil: Pali, District: Korba, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - /' RECEWED-COPY , 1<t^0 cLEREto^^sroa State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare.. Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department^ Chhattisgarh, Raipur. The Assistant Commissioner. Tribal Welfare Department, Collectorate, Korba, District: Ko'rba, Chhattisgarh. 4. Block Education Officer, Pali, ^.^"' District: Ko'rba, Chhattisgarh. ^ /" WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE QF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC., IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR_ANM O IHER SUITABLE WRST OF LIKE NATURE -\ -^ XI-HC-22 3Tl^T'^T h^ ^^ 5n^iiGh 'Hf$a ^^r ^TT^i^r, "^Ti1^ji<o, f^rray 3TI^T '^S^K ...^L..181?J.fw^ 'f"V^ 200 ^ITWTT^W^ '^R^' 3'n^T'^n^r'HJ^TT 15'-Z"I006 Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai,,coun^ Shri Satish &upta, Dy, &ovt. Heard. '- The Detitioner has under Artlcb 226/227 of th© aggneved.by the order dated l8-^- by' tiie Assistant C'o'mmissioner, .ECorba. Learned counse! for ...the f petitioner is worRlnq as a Head Ma| to the offlceof respondent No'*; Weifare ' Department , vide CAnnexure-K/5), He .turther sub{ Annexure-P/4 dated 26-7-2005. that:the petltioner .has been . at1 NoJ/Assistant DeDarrment whereas there Js no-^lork. is any post sanctioned for the peti^J It is'pointed out that vld^ ,Court stuv^ the effectand oDercjtlon tei for the Detltloner. ^-dvocate for the State. Qreferrled the instant wnt Detjtion |ConstItutIon of. India, beJng |m2005 (Annexure-P/5) TribaJ Welfare'. DeDartrnent. chNlcn14irl 'HTR^Tf ^ ^^t Tf^R^K '^^rf^THOT^r betmoner subrnits."that.. the ^ter and'-he has attached ^ssistunt'Commissloner, Tribal order ', dated • 18-8-2005' hiits that this is contrary to iLearned counsei.aiso' submits, to the offlce :.of -'the Tribal .••'Welfare l.of Head Master nor there loner. .. • order dated 31-8-2005 this of order'dated 18-8-200& Corhmissioner, ^ork t ' [Tft^ $p^^ T XI-HC-22 ^r '^iHid^, ^•at^^Ko, f®«ni^y _..3"5..I!i^ ^IW^T 5h^l^ f^ST' ?n^T-^T f^ri^^nt^T 5ti^icti <-iff*a ^n^i'^nr^r-^n -2-- (Annexure~F7<5). It is diso pointe^ the Detitio-ner..was-not reieased fe this Court vlde. order dated'Zl-ll- No.4.to payment of salary of' Leamed counsel for the peti decision of this Court render.ed 1n State ef_Chhatf'isffarh__^_Q' ers__ •out that when the saiary of 9y the resQondent authorities c^005 dlrected the respondent the Detjtjoner, loner reliance UDOH the^ |the case of TlOQa w. tW. P. No. of Para 4 of the said decislon 'is relevant ar|d quoted beiow : conten^ed "4. It Is Secretary of the Stat^ taken a meeting' and. jt| no offjcer/ernpioyee o{ attached from; his .origl is further contende^ Aditiinistratlon - DeDoir Chhattisgarn, is'sued 2GQ1 (A,nn®xure°P/2)| departm.ents of the. order of. attachment. places by djsturbing^ piace of postlng. It ls| such an order of| then it shouid be cancd! 'ernDioyee shouid be Dost OT •posting^ ^nnexure-rj'y non' 4.U^<^ at if any p€|rson the attachment order ^Nt<v1141r1 'RTH^Tf ^ 'fe1^' Tf^f^R ^T 3Tf^R.3T?^T that the Chlef ^ of Chhattisgarh had Ihas been declded that f .the. State would be i|'iai 'of It that the • ©eneral • irtment, - State . of drcuiar dated 4-6- directing ai! the jtate not to issue any jf empioyees, to other from their. parent laJso-contended'fhat In atto.chment. is ,/ iied and the concerned ted at h Is orJQina! Dlace further contains .a is attached, then ^houid.be canceiJed^ It tttieni rr/^ [Tft^ ^^ ^F XI-HC-22 -^ocT ^|^|<r)4, ^nl^^Ko, f®i<vii^<j,< 3TR^ '^W _....^£...l.?M/^r '"^ 200 ^IIN^B ^^ieh "^^ST' 3:iT^T'^T W^ ^rrt^i ^^i^Tift^T ^own ^^ is c'Qntented that J1 is attached, then: disdpi belnitiated." y ^ '! Return has not been'fJJed by Learne'd counsei aDpearlng for to dlspute the afor^said.facts. . -. Havina consldered the facts material on . record and m vlew o' & . . , • • '...•• .rendered in the of T opinlon- that- the attachment (Annexure-P/t)), issued by the. A^ •Weifare Departwent/Korba, in reg^ to be setaside, Accordingiy,.jt is In the result, the petition is appilcations, if any, stand dispo^ <=hs<Lif<n1li1<i 4i^<^T'? Fs^l ^psi^R ^'3Tf^rq ^3Ti^T . in future -any person I|lary proceedingS-may i-tie respondents. • • ^the State Is not ln.a position ahd circumstances ofthe case,: the ' decision of • th Js' Court 7^ (supra}, ,th Is Court" Is of 'the order dated 18-8-2005 jsrstant C'ommissioner, .Iribai l4rd .to the Detltioner deserves aside, ^liowed, ConsequentJy/pending s^t icd of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ ^Ra^ y