CRM No. M-33593 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-33593 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.11.2011 Resham Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Grievance of the petitioner is that he has moved an application for mutation before Sh. Amarjit Singh, Tehsildar, on 18.7.2011; Tehsildar has directed the Patwari to put up the mutation proceedings before him, however, Patwari has later on reported that mutation No.5104 has already been sanctioned on 12.7.2011. Further grievance of the petitioner is that mutation dated 12.7.2011 is ante-dated and has been sanctioned having conspired with opposite party. Mutation order dated 12.7.2011, which is said to be ante- dated, can be challenged by the petitioner before the appropriate forum. If higher authority or Court comes to the conclusion that order dated 12.7.2011 is ante-dated and perjury has been made in the official record, direction can be issued therein to initiate disciplinary action as well as the criminal action against the person who is found having done perjury CRM No. M-33593 of 2011 (O&M) -2- in the official record. In view of this, I am not inclined to invoke my jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the police to register an FIR straightway against the Tehsildar and Patwari, as claimed by the petitioner. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge November 07, 2011 R.S.