IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7671 of 2011 RAJESH KUMAR OJHA @ RAJU OJHA SON OF RAMNATH OJHA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MADHURANDRA PRASAD SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA REWAT. ----------- 2 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 and 139 of the Electricity Act. It is alleged against the petitioner, being the generator operator, to have supplied electricity illegally to the consumers. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that all the consumers were consuming the electricity directly and they were only being supplied the electricity through generator by the petitioner when electric supply goes off. The loss has been calculated to the tune of Rs. 5,50,000/-. Let the petitioner deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- within a period of three months before the learned court below, which will be invested in some fix deposit scheme, which will be subject to the result of the case. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 64/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted and after deposit of the said amount, the bail bond of the petitioner will be finally accepted. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)