IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.611 of 2011 Date of decision : September 30, 2011 Sohan Singh …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Case of the petitioner is covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court, rendered in CWP No.1140 of 2011, titled Lekh Raj and another versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 29th July, 2011. 2. In terms of the aforesaid judgment, writ petition is disposed of, with the following order: If on the facts, the case of the petitioner is covered under the judgments dated 15th July, 2010, rendered by this Court in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram versus State of H.P. and others and 16th December, 2010 in CWP No.4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. and another and connected matters and if the same have attained finality and have been implemented and Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… they are similarly situated, the petitioner shall also be treated similarly without any discrimination and benefit of the said judgments shall be extended to him, within three months from the date of the production of copies of this judgment and the judgments referred to hereinabove, by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of being heard to him, if so desired. Writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of. September 30, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J