’Mww WW ‘ ’ IN I THE HIGH COURT w.p. No. OF JUDICATURE, 517% [2006 AT BILAsPUR PETITIONER (:$) Prof. (Dr.) PraTap Kumar M'shra S/o ’ ,“Mwwrxmw ”U z Late Shri ’ ‘ f Mishra, Aged about 66 years, Retired Professor, .P. Vipra College, Bilaspur (C.G.), ..«'1‘2/o Chitle Colony Kududand, . x wvWumuLVvr \ a . w Qg‘ié"%§ 0’ ‘o 1Q tf'g‘ -T RESPONDWS Q‘ e as» » é) by 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Ministry of // Higher Education, jThrough Secretariat, Secretary at Raipur ~‘ (C.G.) / \. WW WV Vcvc c o soaouooooeooeaocoo woos 2. Commissioner, / [Higher Education, Govt. Science College Campus, Raipur (C.G). Snatak Mahavidyaiaya Shikshan/ Samiti, Through Chairman Shri R.N. hukla, R/o 26—A, Vidhya Nagar Bilaspur (C.G.) Governing Body,’ / D.P. ipra College, Bilasur hrough Secretary/Principal, .P. Vipra College, High Court Road ilaspur (C.G.) ~ .P. Vipa c‘ouege ThOugh'Pr-incipal, igh Court Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OE INDIA he petitioner, named above, bes to submit a unde- T g s r: bWCv» Wvv wmww Wmxww c ”L. .., L r ...... P r S , ‘ V p T D , B - D f r r _ H O R D E R (Passed on 29’“ day of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. No. 2318/2002 (Professor Dr. ‘ 5.6. Shrivastava Vs. State of Chhattisgarh a others), which was allowed vide order dated 18.1.2006 (Annexure P/8). They further submit that the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are alloWed in terms of the order dated 18.1.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. No. W. P. No. 2318/2002. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other‘ connected writ petitions. l Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W, P. (s) No. 5968 of 2006 Pafi‘l'ioner : Prof. (Dix) Pmbhakar Pandey Versus Responderws : Shh of Chhaffisgurh & ofhers W. P. (s) No. 5969 of 2006 Petitioner : Prof. (Dr.) D. Prakasham Versus Rz$ondenfs : Sfafe of Chhuffisgarh 8t ofhers And W. P. (s) No. 5970 of 2006 Petitioner : Prof. (Dru) Pmtap Kumar Mishra Versus Respondents State of Chhuttisgarh & others $8: Hon'ble Mr. Justice satish K. Agniho‘l'ri. J Present: Mr. B.P. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for the respondents/State.