IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No. 584 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 5.11.2008. Lal Chand ....Appellant Versus Gram Panchayat and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.Arun Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Rupam Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents. RAJESH BINDAL, J. The plaintiff is in appeal before this Court against the concurrent finding of fact whereby the suit for permanent injunction filed by him for restraining the respondent/defendants from causing any kind of hindrance in excavation work of well in his land was dismissed. Learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff submits that he is owner of agriculture land falling in Khasra No.7/1, Khewat No.110/107 min, Khatoni No.131 min. Rect. No.11 measuring 3 kanals 3 marlas situated in village Baliyar Khurd, Tehsil and District Rewari. whereas the Gram Panchayat is owner of Khewat No.183 Khatoni No.248 min. Khasra No.31 measuring 50 kanals 9 marlas, which is a gair mumkin johar. Learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff submits that he makes a statement at bar that he will not interfere in possession of Gram Panchayat in Khewat No.183 Khatoni No. 248 min Khasra No.31, as mentioned above, which are owned by it as he will excavate in Khasra No.7/1 owned by him. To this statement learned counsel for respondents does not have any objection. In view of the statement of the parties, the present appeal is disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 5.11.2008. JUDGE Reema