THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.25239 of 2009 Dated: 20.11.2009 Between: Chattipalli Bullemma. .. Petitioner. And State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, And others. .. Respondents. ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. According to the petitioner, she was granted ryotwari patta in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.21.00 in old S.Nos.13 and 14 of Yendada village, Visakhapatnam District, which originally belonged to Vizianagaram estate, by the Assistant Settlement Officer, Vizianagaram, vide his proceedings in Sr.No.11(a) D.C.(1)/VSP, dated 12.07.1957. It is the case of the petitioner that while incorporating the changes in the concerned revenue records pertaining to the said land, pursuant to the orders dated 12.07.1957, an extent of Ac.3.55 cents covered by Sy.Nos.14/3 (part) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the subject land’) was omitted and the same was shown as Assessed Waste Dry land (AWD) in the revenue records. The petitioner contends that as no steps have been taken on her repeated representations to the revenue authorities to incorporate her name in the revenue records in so far as the subject land is concerned, she was constrained to file an application before the 3rd respondent-Settlement Officer-cum-Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam District, in the year 1997, upon which, the 2nd respondent-District Collector, Visakhapatnam, vide proceedings in Rc.No.76/04/97/D3, dated 12.12.1997, directed the 4th respondent- Mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam (Rural) to enquire into the matter, verify the records and submit detailed report thereon. Thereafter, the 4th respondent, after conducting detailed enquiry, submitted report vide proceedings in Rc.No.44/98/A, along with records of enquiry, sketch, copies of SLR and SF7 and VA-II register, to the 2nd respondent for necessary action. It is the grievance of the petitioner that since the 2nd respondent was not taking any action in the matter despite the 4th respondent submitting his report in Rc.No.44/98/A, she submitted an application on 05.09.2009 to the 2nd respondent, seeking to incorporate her name in the revenue records in respect of the subject land, pursuant to the proceedings in Rc.No.44/98/A of the 4th respondent, but the said application is not considered till date and, therefore, she approached this Court seeking appropriate directions. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondents are directed to consider the representation dated 05.09.2009 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, as per law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the subject land. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 20.11.2009 v v