:^'' ^ a.^gSiiim • INTHE^Ii[(%©OUI^i( *JlJDI€3CT®^^ :-.^.'M'^®iu^reR'^:'..;'-<'-:::.'. WRitpmamoNi^. ^^/2006^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ PETFETONER fc^f^ ^m ^^ ^. f\/.y . •:• ^^"yy y ^y :SPONDENTS y: •^.iHa|RdK|?AM3>EWAN©ftWi1';:'::::,W-^.- a^SSI^DhlffivmdDew,'^^ \Agedi|ffihout46iys^s,,^ ^^^^^ ^ ^ Asastg^Developiaertt ExferlSiott^ :;^fBcer,K[*jarayaa:pu:c,; ^: ^:: .'-'•.•:':;;':1^"'. ©istt-Bastar (C.e.) Versus:.'' :1'^1'''':'' ';::1-'.1 • '" '"'-,~1'."; l.STATB©^<^|^T'FIS<3^gH Throu^:?p Seci-e^^ DeparCm^GH^ qf PancUayat & ,RuraE; pevelopmen^^^^^^^^^^^^^ D Mairtralya^aipui-, (C.G.}; 2, DEVEN3^NENTG£)MMISSI0^ GhKatti^garli,Raipur(G.©.)^ /<3. eoUectoi-^Bastar (G,Cr.) ;;,;"4. .;l<31uef?Ex^tttN^OffiueB:c,I i? m 11 IMIS%KSIIs ^5..Ghief^Executj^'0£Gcer,i-^ yanpadiPaiKdaayafcNarayaRp^ •^s&. .'.,:: l:Distnct-.:Bastar;:(G.©.):i.^:.j;'' WREI'PmTraONlINDER.AR'ia6I^226f^7aK'E^ CONS'lffliJTSONQFINEIA.E'OKISS^^ ?e rnSl<038^I®ERfStt^DIREEmQN®s^^^^^^^.^^® a •sBiai Y^:i XI-HC-22 's^ ~;wvpf, ^wte, hv^wy an^I'cRl ^ ^iwan^i arqNTflfi^ STI^TTCT^T^ttf 24-4-2006 AAr. V'.C. Sharma, Advocat^ with Ali". i-i.C. Shukia, counsei fop +he petitioner. Miss Depaii Pandey, Pcne! Heard both the counsei. By +hi^ writ peti+ion unde^ . ^iprftiNhiIp:i?ff"?'feca}^f5R?R ^siPwsn^i f-awyer for l+'e 5t(ite/respondents. Ar+icle 226/227 of the Con^ti+u+ion of India, thc peTjtioner' hcs questioned iegailt'j', propriefy and correctness ofrhe erder eiated 22- 3-2006 (Annexure P-1) passed b^ respondent No.l,!«h<t'eby+hepst!tionerh<ssbeen transfe-rred from Naroyanpur/^astar under the jurisdiction of District Panchayai'; &antewado. The main orievance of petitione!* wcs wopking on ths p Nfwoysnpur since 21-2-1991 snd inception i.e. from the date of o( whieh is also a scheduled area. / 2005 in respect af tr'onsfers of| a scheduled arac for c niinirauni piaca oT nis choice. In spite sehedulsd srea, befor«transfei swithout taking iritc considet'otiorj tha'trarisfs". FurThs" 9r','evcnc4 2005, passed by the Seneral •i'he pe+itioner- in this writ pe+ition is that the ijsst of AsslstGRt Dsvelopnient Extensicn Offics" <s* Itiiot 'tS the schedujad Qsva. Prior- to that aiso from ^pointment, the petitioner was workirg at Kondayion ^s per para 3 of the Sovernmant policy dated 20-10- jemployees, if sny ©overnmentservant has servsd' in ^er'iod of fjye yeors, ha i's sntitied for post!'n9 at the pr rancienng service for a panoct OT ^J years in j'ring the petitioner to Dantewado vide the tmpu9ned order, no such option was sou^ht for and the impugned ordep has beert passed the ©overnmentpcliey dated 20-10-2005 regarding ffl of the pstiTioner is that vide orde" dsTed 20" May, dministration Depar'tment, Sovt. af Chhattisgar-h, there was a ban of transfers i^i ths year 2005-2006 anrf as per that ban withoyt r-a-^ *l«~- ^ jvg v<ai XI-HC-22 -S^ -tiWMU, QWV , (««11'M^< 'sn^c^r 'f?::Ira'sn^i *»<!+'Hf?? ,'Ly y. ^ '\ ^ sii^rs'raisiT^f^i •^ seeking prior perwission of the C^ie effectad. Lecrned counsel for the peti^io been effected in violtrt-ion af the abov^ the petitioner mcy be allowed to mcl^e Ths dscision Is fsken by rsspondeRt whieh iear'ned counsei oppearing for t^ie As the praysr made by !earn4d » raasonabie. thei'efoce. the petition^r- respondent No.l reusing his grievancs^ itie'f IMrusies', m Tronsfei' couid have been petitioner', wfhm a persod of t8B| rspr-esentation, responaent No.l shaii rai-sed by the pet'tioner in an objecti^ date of receipt of the r'spresentationj not be r'elieved from the place of pos^ing. With the direction cforescid, tfie Consequentiy,M.(W.5P.NQ.14S4/2<Xj6 Parttes are entitled for certifilt qOTSCT'ftf -WTCff •? fec^ TfSf^R ^7 sipsq an^r i^ioner submittsd thatsince the transfsr has poiicy decision of the Sover'nment, therefora, ikje a representation to respondent No.l and titl !No.l, the petjTioner's Transfer be stff/ed, tc S'i'ate/'responden+s has no objaction. counsel for the petitioner is Just, fair and is cllowed to make a r'apresentation to . ^as hss been arguad by learned counse! for the days from tociay arid on rsceipt of the decide the same considering ai! the grieyances i^re mannsr within a period of 30 days frora the Tii! such decision is taken, the petitioner shall ie petltion stssnds disposed of. aiso stands disposed of. d eopy of this orcier. Sdf- L.C. Bhadoo Judge . [Tft^ •S^a^ <: