IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 23RD BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28408 of 2010(A) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- VINU P.V., AGED 32, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, PEDIKATUPARAMBIL HOUSE, ALOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR - 680 01. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 121. 4. THE VICAR, ST.ANTONY'S CHURCH, KANAKAMALA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 689. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. M.A. ASIF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 28408 of 2010 A ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is that permit granted for excavation of red stone for the benefit of the fourth respondent, though expired, the excavation is still continuing. Going by the averments in the writ petition, it is seen that the permit was granted by the second respondent. Therefore, if unauthorised excavation is continuing, the petitioner should have moved the second respondent itself. In view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to move the second respondent and directing that in which event, necessary action in accordance with law will be taken by the second respondent. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge