IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C482 No. 319 of 2011 Vineet Bahuguna …………….Applicant. Vs State of Uttarakhand and another. …………..Respondents. Present : Mr. Atul Bahuguna, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Atul Bahuguna, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. By means of this application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the applicant is challenging the summoning order dated 7.4.2010 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Dehradun on a complaint made by respondent no. 2 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which was registered as Complaint Case No. 2187 of 2010 Umesh Sharma Vs. Vineet Bahuguna. On the basis of the averments made in the petition and considering the nature of the offence, this Court finds no justifiable reasons to make interference in this case in its inherent and extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The instant C482 petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.4.2011 Rathour