CMPMO 235 of 2008 20.4.2009 Present: Shri G.D. Verma, Sr. Advocate with Shri Romesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Naresh Kumar Sood, Advocate, for the respondent. CMPMO 235 of 2008 This petition has been preferred by the defendant herein against the order passed by the trial Court on 17th July, 2008 declining the request of petitioner-defendant herein to summon Shri U.C.Sood learned counsel for the plaintiff as a witness to prove the document i.e. sale deed dated 4th April, 1995 (Annexure P-7 with this petition) executed between Amar Singh and the plaintiff. The purpose of citing Shri U.C. Sood, Advocate, as a witness was to prove the contents of the sale deed, on the allegation that he had drafted the sale deed. The learned Court has dismissed this prayer and imposed a cost of Rs. 1000/-. I am not going into the ethical aspect as to whether Mr. U.C. Sood who has been engaged to represent the plaintiff should continue to do so or not. Shri N.K. Sood, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-plaintiff submits that he has instructions to say that Shri U.C. Sood will admit the contents of the sale deed (Annexure P7 with this petition) and it may be taken on record of the case as an exhibit.This petition is accordingly allowed. The order of the trial Court is quashed and set aside. Let the sale deed be placed on the record of the case as having been proved and accordingly marked as an exhibit. Shri U.C.Sood, Advocate, will not be required to appear as a witness. Petition stands disposed of. Parties to appear before the trial Court on 29th May, 2009. All pending applications disposed of as infructuous. All interim orders are vacated. CMP No. 626 of 2008 Infructuous. The interim order staying further proceedings is vacated. April 20, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (ms) Judge.