HIGH CGUR? OF CHHATTESGARH, BILA$PUR WP. {c} No. M35I2G11 PE‘?!TK>NE% Sewakdas Manikpur, Slo Sukudas‘ Aged about 51 years, Occupation~ Koiwar, R/G Viiiage Chhatora, Post Mandir Hasod. Tahsi! Aarang Dist- Ra‘zpur (C.G.) VERSUS ’“E$P€JN$ENT3 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Manralaya, .K.SV Bhawan, Raipur (IO-G.) L, 2. Coiiectm} Raipur‘ Distt. Raipur (0G,) 3. Sub Divisionat Officer (Reverme) Raipur, D§stt. RaipurY‘CGv) 4. Chiaf Executive Offmer New Raipur Development Authority Teiibandha Jedhi Wa Near Nationa! Garage Ring Road Raipur. Distt. Raipur (CG) 5. Nazul Ofmer Capitai Area Deveiopmeni Authoriw, Raipur (06.) WWT PWWR’W Ufm£R ARTECLE 227 ()F THE CGNSTiTUTmN OF tNDiA Emiggarance: Ms. Deepai§ PaiWdey‘ Advocate for the petitiorier‘ Mr. Arvind Dubeyx Panel Lawyer for the respondents. GRAL GRDER (30.03.2011) SUML KLWEAR SINHA,J. Heard. r The petitioner re a viliage—Kotwar. He has fiieo' this writ oetition for the foiiowing retiefszv “1 . REUEFS 301.}GHT The petitioner moei humbiy prays for the foiiowing reliefs:- 101 That, the Hon'bie Court be pieased to direci the reepondent No. 1 to consider/decide the representaiion/appiioation dared 21.10.10 of the petitioner for grant the faoiiities and aliot land ae the other diepiaoed persons in compiiahce of the directione of the ideal Rehabiiitation Poiioy of ,5 L WP (C) No. 1495:?011 C natusgaH Stat , 200/ atd hereafier acquire tha iam giamed 3:! pet’um’zar a s vme!and That, the paiitior‘er therefore p ys um dureCu m o the respondenw to grant the facilitVES and anet 3and s *he whet di3p£aced perwm i'n comp§éaiioe o: he directmnS/yermdsions 0f the idea! Rehabilitation Poiicy of ChhaitiSgarh $taie, 200?? 103 mm dny 0m? iesief which thiS irim: -vLuie mam IN deems fit m the present facts and circumstances of the case may kindiy be granted.” }n C) D[\ The petiiianer ihus, in su a: anae: IS praymg Im Isnbuance of ’ dnecum} to u’aatide ub xeweseniawn dated 21.10.10 for gram 01 facuities and a1 Lmem of iamd 61$ the cmer diSpiaSeci persons as per the Ideai F? Jihtauvn POnuy, 200 ”16)<Lue—"‘ ) M3. Deepa6i Pamde‘y‘, learned caumsei appearing on behaif of t'ie pautwoe arjues ‘ 1al aa per L :e psov blona o. Clause 4.1 .6 of the poiicy, a deoiaion has beer: taken that ho compensatmh cu service iahd womd be giveh to the Kath/are, however at me ume of ailotme: o: the plote atd grantihg other benefits then caeee ehatt atso he considered as the cases of othe otspsaoeo peteone out nothing has oeei dooe th the ihtereet of the peuuonet though many euoub Have oeeh h :;. JLu Mr. Awihd Dubey, teamed pan laWyex appeaung on oenau o: me S‘até E$ponueme $UtJmILS that u a fresh app auon ts Int-:0 Oy me pew Gite! as per the policy 2007, the competent Homo uy‘ ehah take a decision on the said apotioation. He submits that aimoet in a Simitar matter ie. ?52¢+f4009, A I'\ one Com ae oi poeed of the writ petition of the Kotware Aeeootation ‘oy giwng me membere an oppoitunity to fiie indivicioai appiioations. Acoordingiy, this writ petition is disposed of with a direotion mat if e0 ao‘vieeo, the petitioner may fiieo' a fresh application before the Authority in accordance with iew for“ grant of Petta/aiiotment 01 L' iano i ano I ii t euon V aopiioation ie fited, it shati be disposed of ‘oy the concerned authority in denoe With the revenue laws and a o keeping riino me provreions of the State Rehabiiiation poiioy, 2007. \f’ith the ve obeetvationfoiirectione thieWiit petition re oiepoe cit No order ae to coat. ti- ,11‘ u. _n u‘ n u,