THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15573 of 2010 Dated 23rd August, 2010 Between: Kolanu Narasimha Reddy and others. …Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Principal Secretary and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Dadi Radhakrishna for Sri Chandra Sekhar Ilapakurti Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4: Assistant Government Pleader for Home Counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6: Sri N. Kodanda Rama Rao The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 4 in not arresting respondent Nos.5 and 6 in connection with crime No.110 of 2010 of Chityal Police Station, Nalgonda District, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Kodanda Rama Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6. Alleging that respondent Nos.5 and 6 have trespassed into the property belonging to petitioner No.1 and leased out to petitioner No.3 for running a school and demolished the same, a report was lodged by the petitioners. The said report was registered as crime No.110 of 2010. The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.4 has not been taking any action against respondent Nos.5 and 6 except registration of the above case. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that the investigation of the case is almost complete and that despite the repeated notices issued to the petitioners on 07.07.2010, 11.07.2010 and 16.07.2010, they have not appeared and produced any evidence before respondent No.4 to substantiate the allegations made by them. She further stated that the investigation held so far did not reveal commission of any offence by respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and that an appropriate report is proposed to be filed by respondent No.4 before the jurisdictional Magistrate shortly. In view of the above submissions of the learned Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to file appropriate report within a period of one month from today after notice to the petitioners and if the petitioners feel aggrieved by such report, they are entitled to file protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd August, 2010 GHN