hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 87 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5701 OF 2007 Maruti Vithoba Koli ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. C.K. Bhangoji with Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. For R. Nos. 1, 2 ad 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 08, 2010 P.C. Review Petition is preferred on the ground that the Petitioner have come across an additional documentary evidence in the form of entries in the Birth Register where the caste of the grand father of the Petitioner is shown as Koli Mahadeo. The date of birth in the document now produced is 12.1.1016. In the document of school register produced earlier, the same date of birth was shown and the caste was shown as Koli. This court while considering the claim of the Petitioner relied on various documents as set out in Para 2 of its order wherein none of the close relatives of the Petitioner were shown as belonging to Hindu Mahadeo Koli. We may also note that the committee had also considered the affinity test and arrived at the conclusion that the Petitioner had not satisfied the affinity test. Thus both on the basis of documentary evidence as well as affinity test, the claim of the Petitioner was rejected and this court in Para 4 of its order noted the order of the committee and chose not to interfere with the said order. The document now sought to be produced, the original of which however, was not produced before us. Even otherwise, the name in the new document shown is “Bala Raju Koli” which is different from the name shown in school leaving certificate. In our opinion, this is not a fit case to exercise our review jurisdiction. Hence, Review Petition rejected. (D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)