IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2366 of 2007 MAHBOOB HUSSAIN, S/O- LATE MADHO MIAN, R/O- VILLAGE & P.S. MEHSI, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI 3. THE GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, MOTIHARI, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MEHSI, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. ----------- 2. 16.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner, however, the amount paid towards the provident fund, roughly to the extent of Rs. two lacs is not correct. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the calculation chart was submitted to the District Provident Fund Officer on 18.07.2006 as contained in Annexure-2. As such, respondent no. 3 deserves to be directed to calculate the amount and make the correct payment of the amount of the provident fund. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ application, he proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 alongwith the calculation chart with regard to his claim for payment of - 2 - correct provident fund amount within a period of two months. In case, such representation is filed, respondent no. 3 shall consider and dispose of the same by reasoned order in accordance with law considering the grievance raised in the representation expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. If representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, respondent no. 3 shall simultaneously issue necessary orders with regard to the claim of the petitioner for payment of the dues of the provident fund as raised in his representation in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)