IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2011 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1933 RCRev..No. 218 of 2011() ------------------------ RCA.31/2008 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY ALAPPUZHA. RCP.24/2002 of RENT CONTROL COURT ,ALAPPUZHA .................... REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/1ST COUNTER PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------- PRASAD, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN, RESIDING AT THYVEETTIL, THONDANKULANGARA WARD, SOUTH ARYAD MURI, ARYAD SOUTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN SMT.T.J.SEEMA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ------------------------------------ MARIAMMA JOB, W/O.V.Z.JOB, VAIKKATHUKARAN HOUSE, CULLEN ROAD, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, V.J.ZACHARIA, S/O.V.Z.JOB, AGED 60 YEARS, VAIKKATHUKARAN HOUSE, CULLEN ROAD, ALAPPUZHA - 688001. THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2011, ALONG WITH RCR NO. 219 OF 2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.Nos. 218 & 219 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 15h day of June, 2011 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. In these revisions the tenants in possession of two rooms in a larger building challenge the judgment of the Rent Control Appellate Authority confirming the order of eviction which was passed against them by the Rent Control Court under Section 11 (4)(iv) of Act 2 of 1965. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners, after addressing arguments on the basis of the various grounds raised in these revisions, would fairly bring to our notice our own order in RCR No.124/2011, which was filed by another tenant against one of the judgments covered by the impugned common judgment. On reading through the order in RCR No.124/2011, we find that identical contentions were raised by the revision petitioners therein as the present revision petitioners. According to us, these revisions are liable to fail for the various reasons stated in that order. RCR.Nos.218 & 219/2011 2 We dismiss these revisions. But, we are inclined to grant the relief that was granted to the revision petitioners in RCR No.124/2011. We grant to the revision petitioners in these cases also four months time from today to vacate the petition schedule building and to put the landlady in possession of the same. A copy of the order dated 24/3/2011 in RCR No.124/2011 will be annexed to this order. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk