1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7996/2005 IN FIRST APPEAL(st) NO: 15608/2005 (Mrs.Sumanbai Keshaorao Tibude and another vs. Tulshiram Sahare and others ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Smt. Anita Shinde, Adv.for applicants Coram : A.P.BHANGALE, J. Dated : 3 rd November, 2009 Learned counsel for the applicants states that Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are duly served. Notices were also issued by RPAD besides usual mode of service. 2. No reply has been filed to the application for condonation of delay. 3. It appears that the applicant/appellant no.1 Mrs. Sumanbai is aged about 60 years and resident of village Tumsar Dist.Bhandara. She could not take appropriate steps due to her advanced age and for want of source of income. She was advised to appear before this Court. For want of communication with lawyer she lost time and, therefore, 2 prayed for condonation of delay of 123 days in the interest of justice. 4. According to learned Advocate for applicants, respondents are duly served but they chose not to file any reply. Considering the grounds stated in the application, I think sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence application is allowed. Delay is condoned. First Appeal be registered and numbered with fresh notice to respondents, returnable on 1 st December,2009 . JUDGE. sahare