IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.370 of 2010 RAMITA DEVI W/O SURAJ YADAV, R/O VILLAGE EKANGERDIH, P.S. EKANGER SARAI, DISTRICT NALANDA . Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NALANDA 5. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE EKANGAR SARAI POLICE STATION, P.S. EKANGAR SARAI DISTT. NALANDA 6. SURYADEO PRASAD 7. MAHENDRA YADAV 8. SIKANDAR YADAV 9. BRIJNANDAN YADAV 10. SUREN YADAV SOINS OF SHEODHARI PRASAD YADAV. 11. SANJAY YADAV SON OF SUREN YADAV ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE EKANGERDIH, P.S. EKANGER SARAI, DISTRICT NALANDA. ----------- 2 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that the writ of mandamus should be directed to respondent authority for giving protection to her life and property with further direction to the respondents not to disturb her from living peaceful life. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed a maintenance case against her husband, who is a constable, as also filed a case for the offence alleged under Section 498A of the I.P.C. Considering the prayer of the petitioner and the averments made in the writ 2 application, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of her grievances. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/ (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)