CRM-M No.7480 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.7480 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.03.2011 Sanjeev Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab for the State. Mr. GS. Mann, Advocate for the complainant. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No.124 dated 27.12.2010 under Sections 420/406 IPC, read with Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Sections 102 & 103 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, Police Station P.A.U., Ludhiana. On 10.3.2011, this Court passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the allegation CRM-M No.7480 of 2011 2 against the petitioner is that without any authority of the Department of Post, he was using logo of the Department and by giving advertisement, allured several people including the complainant for investment of money. Thinking that the deposit scheme is of Department of Post, complainant had deposited the amount with the accused – petitioner and on demand, accused – petitioner had failed to return the money to the complainant. Learned counsel vehemently argued that Department of Post has never made any complaint for using the logo of Department of Post. Therefore, Section 63 of the Copyright Act is not attracted. Learned counsel further argued that though as per agreement, no refund is possible yet to show his bonafide, money deposited by the complainant shall be deposited with the trial Court within 10 days.” Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has deposited Rs.4,35,000/- with the trial Court in compliance of order dated 10.3.2011 to show bonafide. Learned counsel for the complainant states that he may be permitted to withdraw the amount. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab on the instructions of ASI Angrej Singh states that investigation is going on and challan has not been submitted as yet. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the CJM, Ludhiana. Complainant can move proper application before the CJM, Ludhiana for release of the amount deposited CRM-M No.7480 of 2011 3 by the accused – petitioner, which shall be decided by the CJM in accordance with law after hearing the parties. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 23.03.2011 sk.