S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO.47/07 IN S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.343/06. Madan Lal vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi. Date of Order: 22.1.2008. HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. C.P.Soni for the applicant. ... The applicant-appellant could not submit the undertaking in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 17.4.2007. Then the applicant submitted this application for extension of time for furnishing undertaking and for making payment of decretal amount etc. This Court vide order dated 26.7.2007 directed the applicant to comply with the order within a period of one week from the date of order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the applicant has complied with the order dated 17.4.2007 in extended period of time. Notices were sent to the non-applicant-respondent but it appears that she was not found despite several efforts. It appears that the respondent also might not have objection, therefore, she has not approached this Court or before the executing court for executing the decree on account of default committed by the applicant. No useful purpose will be served by keeping this application pending . Therefore, the application is allowed and it is ordered that since the applicant-appellant has complied with the order dated 17.4.2007 within the extended period as extended by this Court vide order dated 26.7.2007, therefore, the undertaking and the payment be treated as in time and the petitioner shall be entitled to the benefit under the order dated 17.4.2007 passed in S.B.Civil Second Appeal No.343/2006. ( PRAKASH TATIA),J.