HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No. 2466 OF 2010 Friday, the Eighteenth day of June, Two Thousand and Ten Between Syed Rafiuddin Petitioner AND Mohd. Waheed Ali Khan Respondent THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO. 2466 OF 2010 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Sec.151 CPC is filed by the Judgment Debtor in E.P. No. 39 of 2009 in O.S. No. 4744 of 2004 on the file of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, aggrieved by the order dated 4.5.2010 passed in EA No. 163 of 2010 dismissing the petition seeking to grant instalments at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month till the entire amount is paid. The respondent herein filed the above E.P. seeking attachment of movable property of the petitioner herein for recovery of Rs.28,459/- in terms of the decree dated 26.06.2007 passed in OS No.4744 of 2004 by the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The said E.P. was allowed and warrant of attachment was ordered to be issued. The petitioner herein filed the above E.A. seeking instalments of Rs.1,500/- per month, which was dismissed by the court below, by the order impugned. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. As can be seen from the decree, the claim is of the year 1995 and the decree came to be passed on 26.6.2007. In this premise, the court below is perfectly justified in dismissing the petition apart from observing that Order 20 Rule 11(2) CPC does not justify granting of instalments where it is objected to by the decree holder. Having gone through the entire material available on record, I do not find see any illegality or irregularity in the order impugned. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari June 18, 2010 MAS