IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.30775 OF 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 12, 2011 Sukhminder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.K.S.Boparai, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for the petitioner points out that further investigation in this case was directed by the court of Addl.Sessions Judge, Ludhiana exercising the powers under the Prevention of Corruption Act by invoking the provisions of Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. The police has not submitted any further report, but has pointed out that the further investigation was untenable. The Court instead of requiring the police to comply with the directions decided to proceed with the matter. If this course is not legally permissible, it is appropriate for the petitioner first to raise this plea before the trial Court concerned pointing out all the legal provisions. This court may then consider the legal position that would emerge from this situation, as noticed above. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to first approach the trial Court. Dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach the trial Court. October 12, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE