IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1349 of 2009 RAMA SHANKAR PRASAD @ RAM SHANKAR PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 23-2-2011 On hearing the parties and going through the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of University it is found that there is a categorical assertion that provident fund deductions were deposited in the Bank and they earned interest till same were paid to the petitioner. In support of this stand the University has annexed annexure-A. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken help of a fact mentioned in annexure-A that for certain period in 1994-95 as well as in 1996-97 there was no deposit of either employees’ subscription or employers’ contribution. According to him employees subscription was deducted by the University which in the case of the petitioner came to Rs.47,250/- but the same has been paid back to the petitioner without any interest. On going through the materials available on record including the order of the writ court, this Court finds that no issue of fact has been decided by the writ court and hence it would not be proper for this Court to decide the said issue of 2 fact in exercise of contempt jurisdiction, hence this contempt application is dismissed. However, it will be open to the petitioner to raise a grievance before the University and its authority who are expected to consider the same in accordance with law. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)