1 C.W.P. No. 8371 of 1993 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --- . 8371 1993 Civil Writ Petition No of : 15, 2010 Date of Decision March Dharam Mohan and others --- Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --- Respondents : CORAM . HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL *** : PRESENT . , Mr Amit Rao Advocate for . , Mr Vivek Singla Advocate . for the petitioners . , Mr Ashwani Markenday , Deputy Advocate General Haryana . 1 2. for respondent Nos and . , Mr Suman Jain Advocate .3. for respondent No --- , . AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J 2 C.W.P. No. 8371 of 1993 226/227 In this petition filed under Articles of the , Constitution of India the petitioners have prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order 14.6.1993, ( -1), dated Annexure P whereby the Administrator , of the Municipal Committee Hisar conveyed to the petitioners an order of the Commissioner and Secretary to Government , , of Haryana Department of Local Bodies regarding sanction - 3.6.1993 for the creation of work charge posts from to 28.2.1994 15.9.1992, in compliance to an order dated of this , . 17785 1991. Court passed in Civil Writ Petition No of The petitioners further sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay to them the annual increments and allowances as well as other service benefits from the dates of their initial appointments and further to fix their salaries as - 1.4.1978, 1.4.1982 per the revision of the pay scales on and 1.1.1986, 12% as also the interest at the rate of per annum . on the arrears due to them , In reply the respondents have placed on record an 16.2.2010 , , affidavit dated of Satya Pal Secretary 3 C.W.P. No. 8371 of 1993 , Improvement Trust Hisar wherein it has been stated that the petitioners had been appointed in various capacities and with effect from different dates and as per the directions of the , . 16/38/93-2 -1 Haryana Government issued vide letter No K 25.8.1993, dated services of all of them have been . . . 1.4.1993. regularised w e f It is further stated that the petitioners have also been granted increments and the . revision of pay scales from the due dates It has been categorically stated further that no arrears remain to be paid . to the petitioners , At the hearing learned counsel for the petitioners did not dispute the aforesaid position and rather admitted the . correctness of the contents of the above affidavit Learned , , counsel however submitted that since the arrears of pay and . allowances etc were paid after a very long time than the , same were actually due the petitioners are entitled to interest . thereon Since there is not enough material on record to show as to what amount of arrears was payable to the 4 C.W.P. No. 8371 of 1993 , petitioners and since when the same were payable it is not . , considered appropriate to go into this question The fact , however remains that the petitioners have undisputedly got . the relief claimed in the petition If they still have any . . grievance i e with regard to payment of interest on the , arrears it is open to them to make a representation to the - respondent authorities for claiming the said relief in . accordance with law In view of the above and also the observations - , . made in the pre para the writ petition stands disposed of . No costs ( ) AJAY KUMAR MITTAL 15, 2010 March JUDGE * * RKMALIK