IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.677 of 2006 URMILA SAHAY,WIFE OF SRI HARI MOHAN SINHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – PANKAJ MARKET (IN FRONT OFSHYAM MANDIR, SARAIYAGANJ) POLICE STATION –MUZAFFARPUR TOWN, DISTRICT – MUZAFFARPUR ……………………… PETITIOENR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER NAMELY SRI S. VIJAY RAGHAVAN, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNEMNT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE BIHAR STATE KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELY SRI SURYADEO RAI, MAHESH BHAWAN, GANDHI MAIDAN EAST, PATNA – 4 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAMELY SRI UMESH PRASAD ARYA, BIHAR STATE KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRICES BOARD, MAHESH BHAWAN, GANDHI MAIDAN EAST, PATNA – 4. 4. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KENDRIYA BASTRAGAR AND KHADI BHAWAN, PATNA CUM DISTRICT KHADI GRAMODYOG OFFICER, DISTRICT OFFICER OF THE BOARD, NAMELY SRI UMESH PRASAD ARYA. MAHESH BHAWAN, GANDHI MAIDAN, EAST PATNA-4 ----------- 4 26.11.2008 This contempt application has been filed alleging non-compliance of common order dated 11.05.2004 passed in the writ matter of the petitioner as well as many others. After the said order of this Court, petitioner filed a detailed representation before the Chief Executive Officer Opposite Party No. 3, a copy whereof is contained in Annexure-4. In the representation, the petitioner has given his claims items wise. The Opposite parties have filed a supplementary show cause, enclosing an order of the Executive Officer as Annexure C. Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties has placed said order of the Executive Officer and has demonstrated that item wise claims of the petitioner as mentioned in Annexure-4 have been dealt with and redressed in respect of some of the claims and have been denied in respect of some of the items. It is not possible for this Court to examine the - 2 - correctness of consideration of the claims of the petitioner item wise on its merits. Therefore, this contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order of the Chief Executive Officer in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. This contempt application is thus disposed of. Kundan (J. N. Singh, J.)