IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 620 OF 2010 Between: Vusipetla Masthanamma ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector/Committee Chairman, District Women & Child Welfare Development Agency, Ongole, Prakasam District and another .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 620 OF 2010 ORDER : The petitioner herein, who was appointed as Anganwadi worker of Rajampalli village of Darsi Mandal was removed from the service on the allegation that she had produced a false residence certificate at the time of interview. It is not in dispute that a show cause notice was issued on 17.09.2009 calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why she should not be removed from service. The petitioner submitted her explanation and after considering the same, the 2nd respondent- Project Director passed the impugned order removing her from service with immediate effect. The said order has been challenged in this writ petition contending inter alia that the allegation that the petitioner is not a resident of Rajampalli village and that a false residence certificate was produced is absolutely wrong and without any basis. A bunch of certificates has been placed before this Court to show that the allegation, upon which the order of removal was passed, was not correct. Apparently the matter involves disputed questions of fact which cannot be enquired into and decided by this Court in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the 1st respondent-District Collector, who is also the Chairman of the District Women and Child Welfare Development Agency. If any such appeal is preferred within a period of two weeks from today, the 1st respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of such appeal. Till such time, the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent shall not be given effect to. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J. Date: 21.01.2010 Note: Issue CC within four days (B/O) Ivd