THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4234 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies representing the respondents. In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the order, dated 10.07.2009 passed by the second respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, suspending her authorisation in respect of Fair Price Shop No.22 of Nadurubada Village, Rayavaram Mandal, pending enquiry. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on the date of the impugned order itself, a notice was issued to the petitioner to show cause as to why her authorisation should not be cancelled and the petitioner submitted her explanation to the same and that so far, no orders have been passed thereon. In view of the fact that the allegations made against the petitioner in the impugned order that she was involved in a criminal case and enrolled as an Advocate, are serious in nature, it is not desirable for this Court to go into their validity at this stage. Inasmuch as the petitioner has already submitted her explanation to the show cause notice, dated 10.07.2009 and the enquiry is pending before the second respondent, I deem it appropriate to direct the second respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th FEBRUARY, 2010. kvni