IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT APPEAL NO : 787 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 31/03/2004 in WP No: 6035 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: K. Raghu Ram Reddy, Authorized Signatory K.L.R. Travels Office at H.No. 10-2-95/1, Road No.3, West Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND The Chief Manager, Vijaya Bank, West Marredpally Branch, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent : MRS.P.BALA RANI The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Sudershan Reddy) The order of the learned single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein, in our considered opinion, does not suffer from any legal infirmities or factual errors. As has been rightly observed by the learned single Judge, the dispute between the appellant and the respondent-bank arises in private law remedy traceable to contract entered into by and between the parties. Under those circumstances, the public law remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not available to decide the dispute raised by the appellant. The remedies of the appellant are left open. This order shall in no manner come in the way of the parties to settle the dispute mutually, if they so intend. With the observations as above, the writ appeal shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. (B.SUDERSHAN REDDY,J.) 27th July, 2004 (K.C.BHANU,J.) msv/bcj To 1. The Chief Manager, Vijaya Bank, West Marredpally Branch, Secunderabad. 2. Two C.D. copies