IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41082 of 2008 1. SATYENDRA PRASAD 2. CHANDRA DEO PRASAD @ CHANDESHWAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 27/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 364 of I.P.C. The submission is of false implication. There are earlier litigations between the parties when both of them filed cased against each other. The present accusations were made only when the petitioners refused a compromise in one of the civil litigations. The police after investigation submitted final form on that ground not sending up for trial and recommending proceedings under Sections-182 and 211 of I.P.C. The victim is stated to have returned home safe and sound without payment of any ransom suo motu. Learned counsel for the State points out that the victim was abducted, but fairly concedes from the case diary that there is no material of the investigation with regard to the place where the victim was allegedly kept and identification by the victim of the place where the abducted was kept. - 2 - Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda in Hilsa P.S. Case No.314 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )