IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Second Appeal No.309 of 2005. Second Appeal No.309 of 2005. Second Appeal No.309 of 2005. Vithoba Bhimasha Birajdar & Others ..Appellants versus Baburao Sidram Patil & Others ..Respondents Mr. Vijay Killedar i/b. Nitin Jamdar for the Appellant None for the respondent. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 9th August, 2007 Dated : 9th August, 2007 Dated : 9th August, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the appellant. 2. The suit for possession of the encroached land was filed. Both the courts below have recorded concurrent finding of fact regarding encroachment and the suit is decreed. No substantial question of law is involved in the matter, nor there is anything to indicate that the concurrent finding of fact is perverse. Hence, there is no substance in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) -2-