IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.12642 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.10.2011 Ashutosh Mishra ....Petitioner Versus Maharishi Dayanand University and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Jatin Salwan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S.K. Tamak, Advocate for respondent No.3. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has placed on record the letter dated 19.07.2011, vide which, the resignation of respondent No.3 has been accepted. In the present petition, the appointment of respondent No.3 has been challenged. As such, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the letter dated 19.07.2011, accepting the resignation of respondent No.3, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as such. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 13.10.2011 JUDGE gurpreet