IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.433 of 2009 BANARSI PRASAD son of Late Bhagwat Bhagat, resident of village Nunhar, P.S. Suryapura District Rohtas. Versus 1.BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD through Sri Niwas Chandra Tiwari, Secretary, East Boring Canal Road, Patna 2.Sri Sidheshwar Prasad, Chairman of the Board, patna. 3.Sri Niwas Chandra Tiwari, Secretary of the Board, Patna. 4.Sri Dhnanjay Kumar, the Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5.Sri Ram Pravesh Singh, District Education Officer,Rohtas. 6.Sri Vinayak Dutt Tripathy, Head master, Rajeshwari Sanskrit High School, Suryapura, Rohtas. 7.The State of Bihar. ----------- 4 23-02-2010 Heard Mr. Kripa Nand Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A.P. Sinha, learned counsel for the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and counsel for the State. This Court in the order dated 23.4.2008 in its operative portion had only directed the Chairman of the Board to pass a reasoned order on the representation to be filed by the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, headmaster of the School and Smt. Seema Pandey, a teacher appointed in place of the petitioner. Counsel for the Board has produced before this Court an order dated 13.11.2009, copy whereof had also been sent to the petitioner vide memo no. 3786 dated 13.11.2009, by which representation of the petitioner had been disposed of by the Chairman of Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board. In the opinion of this Court, after such order has been 2 passed there would be no scope for condemning the Board or its officers who are not in contempt. Mr. Jha however submits that he has not been given copy of the order. From the said order dated 13.11.2009 it is clear that the same was communicated by Chairman of the Board at the address of the petitioner and if he has not received a copy of such order, its copy which has also been produced before this Court may be made available to the petitioner. Be that it may once the order has been passed the order of this court stands complied. That being so, this application for contempt on account of passing of the order can no longer survive and is disposed of accordingly with an observation that it will be open for the petitioner to move appropriate forum against the order passed by the authority. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)