IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23517 of 2010 ARUN HEMBRAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dhamdhaha P.S. Case no. 45 of 2009 registered under sections 302, 307/ 34 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. Admittedly, petitioner is elder brother of the main assailant namely, Ashok Hembram. It is alleged that the petitioner along with above stated Ashok Hembram and four others entered into the house of the informant and thereafter above stated Ashok Hembram opened fire as a result of which informant ‘s son and daughter sustained fire arms injuries and while leaving place the aforesaid persons again made firings which hit one Mallick Tuddu. Subsequently, informant’s son and daughter died on the spot. The reason behind the alleged occurrence is said to be some disputes between Ashok Hembram and daughter of the informant. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the entire allegation centers around against Ashok Hembram who has reason to commit the aforesaid occurrence. As a matter of fact, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only being elder brother of Ashok Hembram. I am not at all convinced with the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner and others accused having shared common intention committed the alleged crime in which two 2 persons died then and there. In the aforesaid circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition is rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))