CR No. 750 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No. 750 of 2009 Date of decision February 20, 2009 Surinder Singh ....... Petitioner Versus Raghbir Singh Grewal and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. R. P. Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner . **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The revision is against the order of ejectment passed against the tenant. The revision petitioner has not shown either the petitioner or respondent as a party in the rent control petition. He is a third party to the petition who sought for impleadment on the ground that tenant had surrendered possession of the property to him. The application for impleadment filed by the third party who is not revision petitioner before this Court appears to have been dismissed on the previous date i.e on 17.12.2008 and the order of ejectment was passed on the subsequent date. 2. The civil revision is against the order of ejectment passed on 18.12.2008 in which as I have observed above, the petitioner is not a party. There is no entitlement for a third party to claim any relief in an action for ejectment by a landlord against his tenant. If he has any right over the property, he will exercise it in the appropriate forum in the manner CR No. 750 of 2009 2 known to law. 3. The Civil revision petition is without any merit and the same is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 20 , 2009 archana