[g'HSlW-U'nU ,^^... .^"--^•f. ^.' ^r ':^- .'".''^^ai: ^ cnPi C ^,0; i^ f2^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON'BLESHRI HON'BLE SHR! 5VGUPTA,C.J.& iNDRA iVSSSHRA, J. M.A.(Ci (PR) No. 296fi of 2007 CSaimant Mukhtar Ahmed, S/o Fakir Mohammad, aged about 35 years, R/o Camp-1, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.5 |aaiia'taj,i,.],gie^. Versus 1. Rajkumar Nishad, S/o Manthar Lal Nishad, R/o Junwani, P.S. Supela, Bhilai, Disirict Durg (C.G.) Driver 2. Smt. Urmila Tripathi, W/o Yogendra Tripathi, R/o 77/9 Nehru Nagar East, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Owner 3. The New India Insurance Company Ltd., Bhiiai. Through - The Nsw I'rsdia Insurance Company Ltd., G.E. Road, Project Auto Mobites, Power House Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) Insurer Memoof Apoea! Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act. Present: None for the appeilant. ird ( 03ro Ju!y, 2008) RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Digitally signed by RAJESH KUMAR SONTEKE Date: 2025.02.05 10:35:49 +0530 f .-'..;.• '^ The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: None for the appellant. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appetlant, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- DHDtENDRA MISHRA. Judge 1. subbu SSa-Ba^!^^'