IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.19633 of 2010(O&M) DATE OF DECISION :02st November, 2010 Darshan Singh ...Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present: Mr.D.R.Singla, Advocate for Mr.Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab Mr.Amarinder Preet, Advocate for respondent no.2 Mr.Manish Bansal, Advocate for respondent no.3 -- 1. Whether Reporters of local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- NIRMALJIT KAUR,J.(Oral) This is a petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint No.106 dated 22.9.2007 U/s 3 (1) of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act) and Section 323/506/34 IPC. Learned counsel for the respondents state that the matter has not been compromised. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition in view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents with liberty to file fresh one on merits. Dismissed as withdrawn. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) November 02, 2010 JUDGE p.singh