^.. .,f-1 W^M :iiiV t'ill '^is. •SVItt' .."^.^.•"g •l*fss'^^ 'h*l®?®^y' 1111 ^IIKI '.^•••.rp.. ^iS'l"? Wi^ wi' XI-HC-22 3?^ '^ww^, vnKww, Kwwy. ^ ^WWI »iWt> 311^1 ^iuch ^c^.f.^h.^.^^ Wi; 200 sn^r^r R-ii+sn^r sbtli'ftylgd sssaT ^^'^^ ^ •^ll^l gWIW?rf?(T tUe 12.7.2005 When the matter is of the petitioner. No repres|i This matter was filed B.K. Anand, who was at SECL. This matter was fil^i treatment of wife of Shri mothcr. As prayed by the] Court vide order dated 1.8. advance yRs.l,94,i treatineut of his mother. matter, as the relief sougt^t been granted to him. respondent is entitled for medical advaace paid to th[( motlier, In view of above, the p| cajlled out, none present on behalf .lentation is inade. }iy Siddharth Anand, son of Shri «hi'!<?ci'i(l-itiiwTffte(A<Ri'<^i< ^isrf^TSf^T relevant tiine employed in the d for advanceaBBitu&T- luedical |B.K. Anand i.e. the petitioner's petitioner in thc petition, the 994 directed the respondents to - to the petitioner for medical ', nothing recuaias in this by the petitioner has already it is made clear that iking the adjustment of the said petitioner for treatiuent of his ,500/ TIterefore, H<twever, a& ;tition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ('fl^y^)