IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8427 of 2009 AJAY PANDEY, SON OF LATE DEORAJ PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – HATA, P.S. – CHENARI, DISTT. ROHTAS. --------- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MR. LALIN KUMAR, ANCHALADHIKARI, CHENARI, P.S. CHENARI, DISTT. ROHTAS. 3. MR. SHYAM NARAYAN RAM, CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CHENARI, P.S. CHENARI, DISTT. ROHTAS. 4. MR. JOKHAN RAM, HALKA KARMCHARI, ANCHAL-CHENARI, P.S. CHENARI, DISTT. ROHTAS. 5. MR. CHANDRADEO PANDEY, SON OF RAM SWAROOP PANDEY 6. MR. SHEO PARSAN PANDEY, SON OF CHANDRADEO PANDEY. BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – HATA, P.S. CHENARI, DISTT. ROHTAS. ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 30.08.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the dismissal of his complaint bearing Complaint Case No. 1040 of 2007 as well as the revisional order dated 20.1.2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Cr. Revision No. 298 of 2008 by which the revisional court has refused to intervene in the matter. From the orders impugned, I find that the reasons for dismissal of the complaint are very cogent and call for no interference. In view of such, this application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)