Q^- \ IN THE HIGH COURT Q(F CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON ( S) No. ^f-^^Qi 2011 pEarmQNER: ..^ ^fw 1 ^ v.v!^* •?..• \.'F w-v w RESPQNDENTS: Balarani eho'uhan S/o I^tte Shri Anand Saaa Chouban, aged about 50 years, occupation service, posted as Sweeper, City Dispensaiy , Jute MiU, Raigarh (CG), R/o bebind Kelo Vihar, Near Trimyrti T^mple, Panjari Plant Rai^arh, District Rai^rh (CCx). Versus <^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Health and Pamily Wetfare Qepartmen4 Mantralay at Q.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(CG). / 2. The Director , Directorate of Health Services, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CQ|. 3. The Collector, Raigarb, Qistrict Raigarh (CG). The Ghief Medieal aad Healtfa Officer, Rai&arh, District Raigarh(CVG). The Civil Surgeon eum Chief Hospital SupeTintendeBt, Rai^rfa, District Raigarh (CG). 5. WRIT PEH'mON UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTIGNOFmDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THEPETN'IONER: . As ststed iHthe cause title above. 2. PARTICULARS QF THE RESPONDENTS: As stated m "the cause titte < ^ v^.•!:^SsgS,s!SSsSegSSSS& Amit HIGH CQURT^F CHHATTISGARH AT KLASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETI130N (S) No. 757 of201 1 Balaram Chouhan. RESPONDENTS VERSUS The State ofChhattisgarh & Otfaers. WKIT PETmON UNDER ARTICU 226 OF THE CONSTnTmON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Agnihotri. J. Present: ShriRakeshPandey, Advocateappearingonbehalfof Shri P.S.Chandel, Advocate forthe petitioner. Sfari Sushil Dubey, Oovemment Advocate forthe State/respondeiits. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed oa 09th day of Febmary, 2011) 1. At the very outset, Shri Dubey, leamed Govemment Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that it appears that the petitioner's repr^entation dated 13.10.2010 (Anneiaire P/8) is pending consideration before Ifae Civil Surgeon cum Chief Hospital Superiatendent, Kirodimal Oovemment Hospital, Raigarh. The said representatiou shall be deeided as ea-ly as possible, preferably withina period offour weeks, as he had made rq)resentation earlier also on 31.03.2008 (Annexure P/7). 2. In view oflfae aBove, Shri Pandey, leamed counsel appearing for Ifae petitioner submits fhat the petitioner does not want press this petition on merits at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the vnt petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. _— Sd/- SatisliK.Agnihotri^ . Judge