(26)* HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 581 of2ooa Petitioners 1 . Sarjuram Sahu Son of Shri Bhagat Ram Sahu, aged about 47' years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher Govt Primary School Chataud Block Kurud District Dhamtari (C G ) Smt. Shakuntaia Sahu Wife of Shri Chandra Kumar Sahu, aged about 43 years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Navin Ghatapar, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Smt. Juga Sahu Wife of Shri Dhanuram Sahu, aged about 50 years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Karaga, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Shyamsunder Sharma Son of Late Shri Harnarayan Sahu, aged about 47 years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Gadadeeh (Rampur), Block Kurud, District Dhamtariu (C.G.). Prahlad Kumar Dhruv Son of Shri Gajpal Singh Dhruv, aged about 48 years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Chiwari, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Mohan Lal Sahu Son of Shri Salikram Sahu, aged about 48 years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Hatband, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Jagmohan Sahu Son of Shri Gokulram Sahu, aged about 44 years, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Parsatti,,Block Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G-) District Education Officer, Dhamtari (co) ‘ iza 3. The Bléck Education Officer, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF . THE CONSTITUTI0N OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28m day of January, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as iearned counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of Iaw, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (2006 (ii) MPJR-CG 96), which has been disposed of vide order dated 3.4.2006. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra), subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.l. Examination Certificates on their own expenses, as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. /r r gal. Ag“"\‘otf‘ ‘ Thakur satish K‘ Judge .t‘ \ Shri P. K. Tulsiyan, Advocates for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. \