@ W CgA m THE men COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 9x46 i [2004 z Smt. Shamim Akhatar, W/ o Yasin Khan, PETITIONER R/o Sarwar Manzil, Maudhapara, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 4: R.T.A., Raipur (C.G.) V2; Ramash Kumar Shanna, C717, Sector~3, Devendra Nagar, Rajpur (C.G.). ) Manohar Shrivas, Raja Talab, Raipur (C.G.) Sukhdev Singh Matharu, New Bombay Market, Raipur. Raghuveér Singh Hora, Shyam Nagar, Raipur. RS ESPONDENT Preetpal Singh Bagg: C—24, Ramkund Vihar, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA g 3?13Hmaa ®€Rmg fEE E3x .g No 2451/2004 mm wt zoo ~3 $uw$($#§my) mmm mwm \ maniam ‘l/ WW 1§Q3W #aihnm 24/3/2005 shri Dinesh RK. Tiwar Shri Parag Kotecha, P'i respondent No.1, Counsel for respondents No. shri Jitendrq Gupta, 2 to 4. Heard. ‘ Shri Tiwari, learnea§ counsel £or the petitioner submits that permanent per mit was granted to the petitioner, by R.T.A. on 21/11/2002, hich was challenged beifore the pa 21/7/2003. i, counsel for the petitioner. anel Lawyer for the state/ SaT.A.T. The 5.ToA.T° has been set aside on the. hearing was not provided considered on merits and ‘sed the impugned order dated Counsel for the petitioner contended that the order ground_ that opportunity of and all applications were not principles of natural justice have not been follOWed. He also contended that for the present ends of justice w is given to the R°T°A¢ to possible as the bus oi the petitioner is not permitted is suffering great loss. \ \ to $13; and the petitioner »G§IPRJ—F§ ill be served if a directions decide the matter as early as ‘ \ \ aaawnmam;@ hn@g mag{ ‘ . ‘mw.g, 2451/2go4 mm m zoo ‘mm (W) '7‘ —__T rm