IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13817 of 2011 1.Veer Kunwar Singh Bus Parao Vendors/Hawkers Union, Patna through its President namely, Ghazanfar Nawab, son of Muzaffar Nawab, resident of Kedar Bhawan, Adalatganj, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna. 2. Ghazanfar Nawab, son of Muzaffar Nawab, resident of Kedar Bhawan, Adalatganj, P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna. 3. Binod Prasad, son of Phaikan Sao, resident of Village- Thamaul, P.S. Kurtha, District-Arwal ----- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner. 5. The Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 6. The District Magistrate, Patna ---- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 24.8.2011 Heard Mr. Mahendra Prasad Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Shyam Kishore Sharma, learned Government Advocate No.3 for respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6, and Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 4 and 5. This writ petition has been filed by way of a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to settle and renew the licenses of the vendors at Mithapur bus stand as per order dated 5.10.2004 issued by this Court in C.W. J.C. No.2290 of 2 1990 (Arun Kumar Mukherjee Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the order dated 5.10.2004 passed in C.W. J.C. No. 2290 of 1990, we do not feel that there was any direction by this Court for renewal of licenses of the vendors at Mithapur bus stand. However, if any individual has grievance due to any action/ inaction by the respondent authorities, it is always open to the said person to move before the appropriate forum including this Court in individual capacity for such redressal of his grievance. This Court does not feel inclined to give any direction for the relief sought for in the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah,J.)