IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.28 of 2009 1. BINODA NAND JHA 2. BIMAL NATH JHA @BIMAL KANT JHA BOTH SONS OF SRI BALBHADRA NARAYAN JHA,R/O VILL. MOHALLA AJAM NAGAR, P.S.L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DIST. DARBHANGA. --- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. VUNA DEVI W/O LATE RAJINDAR DOM. R/O VILL MOHALLA AZAM NAGAR, P.S.L.N. NITHILA UNIVERSITY, DIST.DARBHANGA. --- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Bali Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ----------- 02 19.08.2010 Heard both sides. Present is an application seeking quashment of the order dated 06.12.2008, passed by learned trial Court (Fast Track Court no. V, Darbhanga) in Sessions Trial no. 144 of 2008 (State vs. Vimal Nath Jha & ors.). It appears that on a complaint the matter was referred to the police for institution of case and investigation. On conclusion of investigation the case was found to be true supported by the witnesses. Accordingly, cognizance was taken and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions whereafter the present application was filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners 2 submits that as per the complaint which was later treated as an F.I.R. the date of occurrence is 02.11.2005, whereas a petition was filed by the complainant/informant herself in Court on 29.12.2005 stating therein that by typographical mistake the date of occurrence incorporated in the complaint giving rise to F.I.R. was printed/typed as 02.11.2005 whereas the date of occurrence is/was 02.12.2005. The said document is placed on record as Annexure- 2. This Court finds that the application was never signed by the complainant/informant. In that view of the matter, the consideration made by the learned Court below for rejection of the application filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be said to be illegal/ perverse meriting any interference. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)