IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2011 / 5TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20425 of 2011(C) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SHAHUL HAMEED.P., S/O.MUHAMMED, AGED 50 YEARS, PULAKKAL HOUSE, KALLADIPETTA POST, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PIN 679 313. BY ADVS. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 20425/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF FIR 129/2004 DATED 01/04/2004 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION. P2: COPY OF C.M.P. NO.2060/2004 FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PATTAMBI DATED 23/04/2004. P3: COPY OF FIR 353/2004 DATED 06/09/2004 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION. P4: COPY OF C.M.P. NO.5166/2004 FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PATTAMBI DATED /09/2004. P5: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 20/07/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 20425 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF JULY, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.129/2004 and 353/2004, Exts.P1 and P3, the FIR of which are registered by the Pattambi Police. These crimes have been charge sheeted and are now pending before the Sessions Court (Fast Track-III & I), Palakkad as SC No.12/2009 and SC No.344/2008 respectively. He has also filed Ext.P3 complaint which is also pending before Sessions Court (Fast Track-III) as SC No.13/2009. In so far as Ext.P4 complaint is concerned, although counsel submits that same is also pending before the aforesaid Court, the case has not been numbered yet. Petitioner submitted Ext.P5 representation before the respondent for appointment of Special Prosecutor for prosecuting the aforesaid cases and the reasons justifying the said request have been narrated in Ext.P5. No orders have been passed on Ext.P5 and therefore this writ petition is filed. 2. Since the representation is pending, the only prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the Respondent to consider W.P.(C)No. 20425/2011 -2- Ext.P5 and pass orders thereon. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE AMG True copy P.A to Judge