(Tl» Beiii INTHE HIGH GOURTOFJUDICATUREATBILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH M.C.C. N0.Ln /2007 ^•A^; r:^M^A. N0.396/2006 2,.lv\\ APPELLANT NON-APPLICANT N0.3 ^" ^ National Insurance Company Limited G.E. Road, Near Old Bus Stand, Raipur, Through: Its Acting Divisional Manager, Bilaspur Office, Taha Complex, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENT N0.1 y: (a) ^/ v^ APPLICANTS ^ ., :„. A^/ -•.::•1~\;^^ Smt. Indrani Sahu, Wd/o. Indra Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years (,b) Dheeraj Kumar Sahu, aged about 14 years, S/o. Indra Kumar Sahu J(C) RESPONDENT N0.2 ,NON-APPLICANTN0.1 Ku. Poonam Sahu, aged about 11 years, D/o. Indra Kumar Sahu (Minor Appellant No. b & c on behalf of amicus curie his mother Smt. Indra Sahu. All R/o. Shishak Nagar, Abhanpur, District Raipur (CLAIMANTS^ Murli Manohar Patro aged about 26 years, S/o. Prakash Chand Patro, R/o. Railway Colony, Kasturei Nagar, Police Station and Djstrict Raigarh (Orissa) (DRTVER) RESPONDENT N0.3 /NON-APPLICANT N0.2 M/s. Om Shanti Roadways Pvt. Ltd. Through: P.K. Charipal, Proprietor (Raigarh) District Raigarh (Orissa) (OWNER) ^^^^ <' '-../ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OffMJSC. APPEAt) ^. ^^^No.396/2006 (^) r! HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR; PRA3HANT KUMAR M13HRA, JJ. M.C.C No.41/2007 Applicant Non-aoDJJcant Vs National insurance Company Limited Smt. indrani Sahu & others Presersti Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Advocate forthe appSlcant. ORALORDER (18th Aprsj, 2011) I.M. Quddusi. J: 1. Heard on M.C.P. No.214/07, an application for condonation of delay in filing application for restoration pf M.A.No.396/2006, as the same has been prererred with a deiay of 94 ctays. 2. Considering the grounds mentioned in M.C.P. No.214/07,we are of the opjnionthatiearned counsel for the appeIJant has been able to satjsfactorijy explain the deiay in prefemng the application for restoration (MCG No.41/07) and therefore, M.C.P. No.214/07 is ailowed and delay in filing MCC No.41/07is hereby cona'oned. 3. Heard on MCC No.41/07. ^r 4. The appellant has filed this application for restoration of M.A.No.396/2006 which has been dismjssed in light of the pre-emptory order date.d 30.8.2006 passed by this Court. » 5. For the reasons assigned in the appjication for restoration of MA.No.396/2006. it js allowed and M.A.No.396/2006 is restored to its originai number. 6= List the on 20 Aoril, 2011 along wlth other connected matters i.e M.A. No.394/06, 406/06.975/06 & 160/06. Roshan/. 7. Certifjed copy as per rules. Sd/- l.M.Quddusi Judge Sd//- PrashantKumarMishra Judge i-