C.M. No.3830-C of 1987 and 1 RSA No.2647 of 1987 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No.3830-C of 1987 and RSA No.2647 of 1987 Date of decision: 5.3.2010 Surinder Singh ............Appellant Versus Harnam Singh and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Ms. Shikha Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. G. S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the respondents. --- ALOK SINGH, J. C.M. No.3830-C of 1987 For the reasons stated, copy of order dated 4.5.1987 in FAO No.534 of 1982 is taken on record. RSA No.2647 of 1987 1. From the perusal of the record, it is revealed that first appeal was compromised and was decided with the consent of the parties on the basis of settlement vide impugned judgment dated 8.4.1986. Now appellant has filed present second appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed on the basis of settlement between the parties. C.M. No.3830-C of 1987 and 2 RSA No.2647 of 1987 2. A perusal of the memorandum of appeal reveals that it does not state alleged substantial question of law as required by Sub-section 3 of Section 100 C.P.C. No appeal is maintainable against the judgment and decree passed on the basis of compro- mise/settlement between the parties. 3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 5th March, 2010 JUDGE ashish