1 CR.APL.NO.5342/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18. CRI.APPLN/5342/2010 ( GORAKH RAMDAS SHINDE AND OTHS V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. D.R.Markad, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for the respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 18.1.2011 1. Heard learned Counsel extensively. Counsel submits that in the offence of Decoity, having taken place at about 1.25 a.m.on 1.9.2010, the Cleaner and the Driver referred to a white coloured Marshal Jeep while the investigator has taken charge of a Tempo Trax jeep from the custody of accused and, consequently, no offense is made out against the accused. 2. The cozy submissions of the learned Counsel are difficult to digest as the investigation papers rebel against them. The role of 2 CR.APL.NO.5342/2010 the accused/applicants have been pointed out by the witness. They have been identified in the identification parade held by the investigator. Any defect in conducting identification parade by itself would not be germinating to release the accused/applicants on bail. They are in long drawn custody should not be a ground to shower a concession on them. Hence application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE AGP/5432-10crapl