1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8663 OF 2009 Ratnamala w/o Bhagwatrao Tambare & others .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Satishchandra s/o Bhagwandas Lodha & others .. RRESPONDENT Mr. S.B. Bhapkar, Advocate for the petitioners. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 12th APRIL, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Application presented by the petitioners seeking police protection for enforcing the order of injunction has been turned down by the trial court in view of order passed below exh. 160 in Regular Civil Suit no. 295/2001 decided on 10-8-2009. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is order of injunction clamped against the defendants and the defendants have committed breach of order passed by the court. In these circumstances, the remedy available to the petitioner is to request 2 for an action against the defendants for committing breach of the order passed by the court. Trial court was justified in refusing to consider the application presented at exh 160. The petitioners may avail of appropriate remedy available under the provisions of law and, if, any application for the said purpose is presented to the trial court, the trial court may consider the same in accordance with the provisions of law. No interference is called for in the instant petition in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition stands rejected. 2 In view of dismissal of the petition, pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE) JUDGE dyb/wp8663.09.odt