•sf !D ^. c- ^ 2o^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 333-1 W.P. No,....t7^.Z.t......./2006 PETITIONER: ^^^ .^s^^ A/^.-C ...••'" k-" Y-;.-' ^^% ^u\^ ^'S'iSs'fS^t. ^W-S&i'ol^, /v'sSy"~"'~^ys^. s -,v»'; li-^i s"- i^y^^ \~^\\ iidl n»AM\llKaa({ jj &"A "'X'Stes'W?^ ^t^^w RESPONDENTS: ^^^•Cs^^ ,,:, ^^/^' tl-e State Administrative Service Association, Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Anil Tuteja S/oLateH.L. Tuteja, Aged about 43 years, Deputy Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. U.K. Agrawal S/o Mahabir Prasad Agrawal Aged about 43 years Additional Collector, Rajnandgaon R/oE-11, RKNagar Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Union of India Through its Secretary Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances And Pension, Deptt. of Personnel 85 Training North Block, New Delhi. 2. The State of Chhattisgarh Through its Principal Secretary (General Adininistration Deptt.) D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) iU-— 7 / 3. The Union Public Service Commission Through its Secretary, Dhaulpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi. ^ -S 4. J. MINJ, son of Lat^K. Minj. •y":i-~ Aged about 52 years, Joint Secretary, General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) ^5' •?•^'*. S.K.::Jaiswal, son ofShriL.B. Jaiswal, Aged.about 46 years, Additional Collect'Sa;,. Raipur (C.G.) ' 'SR-SS .^•:. .;. 't ' .-S'V.'s'. ^6. Ashok Agrawal, Son of Late K.L. Agrawal, Aged about 48-years, Misgion Director, ' . .. ; Rajiv Qandhi Shiksha Mission, RaipurfC.G.),,?-" / PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QF APP^OPRIATE^ WreiTS OF MANDAMUS AND CER'nORARJ AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: - '^ HIGHCOURTOFGHMATT'ISGARHATBIt.ASPUR W.P.Na3371of2006 Petitioners Respondents State Administrative Service Association, Chhattisgarh & Another Versus Union of India & Others Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India (DB: Hon'ble Shri I.M. Quddusi & Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.Jl Present Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Asst. Solicitor General of India for respondent-Union of India. Shri BDGuru, Advocate forrespondent No. 4 to 6. ORDER (Passed on 15th day of June,2010) Per I.M. QudUusi, J. 1. It appears that the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur has adjudicated the matter in question by order dated 04.08.2008 in case of Union of tndia vs. M.P. State AdministrativeService Association (Writ Petition No. 9401/2006 (S)), therefore, nothing has to be adjudicated by this court now. However, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners also concedes that this petition has become infructuous in view of the same. 2. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order asto costs. Sd/- .M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge Sahu