THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27711 of 2010 DT.09.11.2010 Between: M/s.Keerthana Granites … Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.Shoba.N Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.6 : Mr.M.Ram Mohan Reddy The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside order, dated 21.09.2010, passed by respondent No.4, whereby he has cancelled the pattadar pass books granted to the petitioner. I have heard Smt.N.Shoba, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Sri M.Ram Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.6. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner raised several contentions on merits, including the one relating to maintainability of appeal before respondent No.4. Inasmuch as the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order impugned in this writ petition is pending before respondent No.3, this Court is not inclined to express any opinion on these contentions, as the same is likely to affect the interests of the parties to the pending revision petition before respondent No.3. However, in the light of the grievance of the petitioner that respondent No.3 has not passed any order on the application for stay filed along with the revision petition and that as serious consequences would flow out of the order passed by respondent No.4, I am of the opinion that it would be in the fitness of things that respondent No.3 disposes of the revision petition at an early date. In order to balance the equities among the parties, it is appropriate that status quo as on today shall be maintained in all respects in respect of the property in dispute, till the revision petition is disposed of by respondent No.3. Having regard to the urgency expressed by the petitioner and respondent No.6, respondent No.3 is directed to dispose of the revision petition, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the petitioner and respondent No.6. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.35364 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 09.11.2010. Note: Communicate the operative portion of the order by wire at party’s costs. (b/o) VGB