IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.805 of 2011 Binod Kumar Yadav . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. . ----------- 3/ 06/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. It is acknowledged that the petitioner has been reinstated. The grievance now is that the termination had been directed to be kept in abeyance and was subsequently found to be illegal. The respondents continued to take work from another wrongly. The petitioner is thus entitled to his arrears of salary from the date of termination till reinstatement. In absence of any directions in the writ petition on these aspects, the Court finds it difficult to proceed in the contempt jurisdiction. If so advised, the petitioner may pursue his remedies in a fresh writ application. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)