IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22059 of 2011(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ BENNET MATHEW EAPEN, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.K.M.EAPEN, KODURUZHATHIL HOUSE, KEEKOZHOOR.P.O., RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.FAZIL SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ SRI.SREEJITH V.S. SRI.K.SUNIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY.P.O., PIN-682 022, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 2. THE CONTROLLER EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY.P.O., PIN-682 022, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHIN UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.22059/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 13/6/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE UNIVERSITY FOR THE PAPER CS-503 SOFTWARE ENGINEER. P2 COPY OF THE PAY IN SLIP DATED 13/6/2011. P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE UNIVERSITY FOR THE PAPER CS-306 ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND CIRCUIT. P4 COPY OF THE PAY IN SLIP DATED 27/7/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 22059 of 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner completed B-Tech Degree- Computer Science. He had failed one paper in the 3rd Semester and one paper in the 5th Semester. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rkc