IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.3379 of 2011 Date of Decision:12.10.2011 Kartar Singh More .... Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to compute the work charge service rendered by the petitioner towards pension and pensionary benefits by considering the same as qualifying service as well as to count the work charge period for additional increment (s) after 8/18 years of service and for Higher Standard Pay Scale after 10/20 years of service and to release the arrears of pay and pension after revising the same along with 18% per annum interest. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.20056 of 2010 decided on 11.11.2010 titled as Mohinder Singh v. U.H.B.VN. Ltd. & others (Annexure P-7). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not dispute that the present case is squarely covered by the C.W.P No.3379 of 2011 -2- aforesaid judgment. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed in the same terms as in CWP No.20056 of 2010 decided on 11.11.2010 titled as Mohinder Singh v. U.H.B.VN. Ltd. & others (Annexure P-7). 12.10.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE