^ ^ j ^_ gBEiftRETHEHON'BLEHItMlCOURTOFGHHABTISG.^Ef^ ATBILASPUR »'...' . . • • ' . ' W.P. fS) Nb. ^^13 / 2000 Petitioner ^^ ^^ ^'^@'% (iii^^ ^y Dr. Sunita Dwivedi, W/o Shrtf M.D. I>wivedi,Agedabout49yeai's;Wor]ang as Assistant Professor {Departiaent Qf Political Science), in Goyerriinent V.Y.T; P.G. Autonomous College, Bhilai, IMstrict-Buig, R/b 89/2, MaitriNagar, Bhilai, District Dilrg (C.G.) ^ Versus : , ! ,', .. :/' ' 1';'' State of ehhattisgarh, throughfhe Secretary; Department of HigMer Edueation, Maiitralaya, D.K.S. Bhayaii, ' Raipur(C.G.) •.' ': • 1 : . :• •^^.^.•^. f:. : '; : .: • \^ • ' '; .' •.. : ::,.'•:. The Director, Directorate pf Higiier Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (G.G.) The Principal, GoveNimeirt V.KE.P|6.^ Autonomous CsDege, Blulai, D^^ ,Durg<C.G^; ',:;,:'jJ.;-:,'::..-:.:1,'^^^^ 'V^lTT^EETrTION®®,BDER^AKTiei3E.a26?OBJnt'ME ':'C©NSlll'(»iQN^10EiINDIJE^"^^ ia 2. 3. HIGHCQURT_OFCHHATTJSGHATBiLASPUR RESPONDENTS VERSUS Dr. Sunita Dwivedi. State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Manish Sharma counsel for the petitfbner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. AG with Smt. Smitha Ghai PL for the respondents No. 1 and 2/State. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 2260F THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (16.07.2009) With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finaliy. Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that despite the orders passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the identical matters being W.P. No. 4863/2001 and W.P. No. 2620/2006 (S$ (Annexure P-9) the petitloner has not been granted the selection grade and senior pay scale. Couns'el for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to fhe respondents/authorities that if the petitioner makes a represerrtationl detailing her grievances therein, the same shail be decided expeditiously.i To thls submission of the counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the auShorities concerned that if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of fhis order, the same shal! be decidedwithin a further period oftwo months fromthe date of its receipt in the iight ofthe aforementioned decisions ofthe High Court of Madhy^ Pradesh. Sdf- Pritinker Diwaker judge