REVN.377,378-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 377 OF 2010 AND CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 378 OF 2010 Mr. Deepak Ramesh Meghnani ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. M. K. Kocharekar, for the Applicant. Mr. A. S. Shitole, APP for Respondent No.1. Mr. Sandeep R. Kamble, for Respondent No.2. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and respondent No.2. The applicant has filed additional affidavit in both the revision applications. He has stated that the parties have settled the dispute. He has stated that he has no objection if an amount of Rs.50,000/- deposited in Cri. Revision Application No. 377 of 2010 and an amount of Rs.one lac deposited in Cri. Revision Application No. 378 of 2010, by him in the Sessions Court, is allowed to be withdrawn by respondent No.2. The REVN.377,378-10 - 2 - learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has no objection if the orders convicting the applicant for the offence punishable under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is quashed and set aside. In view of this statement, the order dated 22nd January, 2008 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla Mumbai in original complaints being C.C. No. 3002163/SS/2007 and CC No. 3002164/SS. 2007 are quashed and set aside. Both the criminal revision applications are accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 2. Respondent No.2 is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.50,000/- deposited in Cri. Revision Application No. 377 of 2010 and an amount of Rs. one lac deposited in Cri. Revision Application No. 378 of 2010, by the applicant in the Sessions Court. Criminal Appeal Nos. 152 of 2008 and 153/2008 pending before the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay therefore, will not survive. [ V. M. KANADE J.]