IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10518 of 2010 SUNIL GUPTA, SON OF LATE BIKAU GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SINGHPAR, P.S.VIJAIPUR, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. …………………………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh and Mrs. Sudha Singh, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 2.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the victim lady was medically examined and in the opinion of the doctor her age was about 18-19 years. The statement of the victim lady was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein she had disclosed her age about 21 years, however, the court has assessed her age to be 18 years. It has also been submitted that the victim lady in the aforesaid statement had stated that her father was trying to sell her to an old person after taking Rs.20,000/- and it had categorically been stated that she was in 2 love with the petitioner and she had willfully gone with him and marriage had also been performed. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 22.10.2009. It is stated that the other co- accused persons, namely, Ajay Rai Madesia @ Panchu Gupta and Kesaw Madesia, had already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order as contained in Anneuxre-‘6’ to the application. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Sunil Gupta, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No.83 of 2009. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)