IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO: 22063 of 2004 Between: Satavahana College Vijayawada, rep by Correspondent Y. Lokanatha Sarama, S/o Adinarayana Sarma, R/o Seetharampuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of A.P., rep by Prl. Secretary, Higher Education Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education, Govt of A.P., Khairatabad, Hyderabad 3 The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4 Ch. Vara Prasad, S/o Prabhakar Rao Stavahana College Seetharampuram, Vijayawada .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd Respondent to accord prior approval for removal of the 4th respondent from service in Pursuance of the letter dated 1-11-2004 of the petitioner herein by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not disposing of the aforesaid letter is illegal, void and biased. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.GADEVENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.4: V.S.R.ANJANEYULU The Court at the stage of admission made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO :22063 of 2004 ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing, Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent, submitted that the proposals, sent by the petitioner-College, were rejected by the 3rd respondet-Regional Director of Collegiate Education, Rajahmundry and thereafter, the 4th respondent was reinstated into service. Therefore, at this present juncture, there is no need to give any direction to the 3rd respondent to accord prior approval for removal of the 4th respondent from service in pursuance of the letter dated 01-11-2004. 2. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. __________________ January 20, 2005 Kvr To 1 The Prl. Secretary, Government of A.P., Higher Education Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education, Govt of A.P., Khairatabad, Hyderabad 3 The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District 4 Two C.Cs. to G.P. for Education, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T.). 5 Two C.D copies.