1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2571 OF 1998 Vice President, Central Railway E.C.C. Sec. Workers’ Union ... Petitioner v/s Chief Manager, Central Railway E.C.C.Socy. Ltd. ... Respondent None present for the petitioner. Mr.Jayesh K. Desai i/by K.S.Bapat for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 14TH JULY, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petitioner who appears in person is not present in Court. He has been absent consistently on the past few occasions. Mr.Desai appearing for the respondent points out that the petition has become infructuous. He states that the petition has been filed in respect of an order passed by the Industrial Court in a complaint wherein the petitioner had challenged his supersession in service. After this petition was filed, the petitioner has been terminated from service on 2 23.8.1996. He challenged that termination before the Labour Court. The Labour Court has dismissed the complaint filed under the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act. The revision filed before the Industrial Court is still pending. 2. In my view, the petition has become infructuous since the petitioner was dismissed from service. 3. Writ petition dismissed. ..... 3