IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS NO. 961 OF 2008 Bhuwneshwari Negi ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Kotiyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State / respondents. 26th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Notice on behalf of the State / respondents has already been accepted by the Chief Standing Counsel. 2. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 25.7.2008 passed by the respondent no. 3, contained in Annexure No.3 to the writ petition, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Primary School, Aamsaur to Primary School, Dharasu, District Pauri Garhwal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is aged about 55 years, but is being transferred to a remote place, which is contrary to the guidelines issued by the State Government . As per the guidelines issued by the State Government and the transfer policy, the transfer of the petitioner could not have been made. 4. Regarding the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner may make a representation before the Competent Authority. The Competent Authority shall decide the said representation after taking into account all the aforesaid facts in accordance with the guidelines and pass the order within a period of ten days from the date of production of the certified copy of the order. For a period of ten days, transfer of the petitioner shall remain stayed. 5. Petition is disposed of finally along with the pending applications(s). (P.C. Verma, J.) 26.9.2008 Rathour