IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2010 / 21ST ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6214 of 2010(D) ------------------------------------------ (CRIME NO.594/2010 OF THENMALA POLICE STATION, NOW PENDING AS C.P. NO. 168/10 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT) ........... PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------- SUDARSANAN, S/O.GOPALAN, SEEMA SADANAM, THENMALA WEST, THENMALA CHERIYIL, THENMALA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENMALA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 6214 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DATED: 13th day of October, 2010 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.594/2010 of Thenmala Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 1500 litres of wash, seeks his enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter-alia that the contraband liquor involved in this case is 1500 litres of wash and that the 1st accused in the case has been granted bail in view of the fact that A1 is a woman. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that he has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under sec.41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify his release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. dmb