IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE ATBILASPUR fC.G.) F.A. N0. o, / 2008 APPELLANT/ fFENDANT € ~~ RESPONDENT/ •'LAINTIFF Ashok Panjwani Vigya, aged about 42 years, S/o, Shri Shankar Lal Panjwani, R/o. 336, Janta Colony, Behind Radhakrishna School, Gudiyari, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS "Smt. S.K. Gupta, aged about years, W/o. Shri t» »» »<es*(l t<t»A ^'^.[..^•^^'^Radheshyam' Gupta, R/o 336, ...A-a."\',«'Wy:"'/) A Janta Colony Housing Board, ".,.»,«>«-T'^"'"I.L-1-<"01 ^ Gudiyari, Tahsil and District ^^....-^ laipur(C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTION96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 'say&B^sQSfctditaaKfp 6' & 1'f ^ t y^ ^||<||CT.q, (^.\WW, I^Wy. s .^- ^.^.y. VW^I (biiici, • t ' ^ 20 an^?r 'vw ( ^di-^isi^g) an^t.'^Tf^TO? ^i'nsiR?! ^fN; S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. A Sahu TOIRR ^rftg 311^1 06.09.2012 °bl<l[fl<i1l tIlIRJT i( fest <f«iyi< i?3rRiH3ii^i None for the appellant. Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Advdcate for the respondent. On earlier occasions, the |matter was dismissed for want of prosecution and the same was counsel. Again, the matter is calli oc.casions, none appears nor any the appellant. The appellant may |not be interested in tfae matter. In view of the above, tUe matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs restored in absence of appellant's id for hearing twice. On both the representation is made on behalf of Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge j_