IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.273 of 2008 1. ARBIND KUMAR, SON OF SRI RAM NARAYAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KABAIYA ROAD KALIASTHAN, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 2. MAHADEO SAH, SON OF LATE GANGA, RESIDENT OF AT + P.O. MANGARH, P.S. DHARHARA, DISTRICT MUNGER 3. ANILENDRA KUMAR, SON OF SRI RAM NARAYAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KABAIYA ROAD KALIASTHAN, P.O. LAKHISARAI, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 4. SUNILENDRA KUMAR, SON OF SRI RAM NARAYAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KABAIYA ROAD, KALIASTHAN, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 5. MADAN MOHAN PRASAD SRIVASTAVA, SON OF SRI NABDESHWAR PD. SHRIVASTAVA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JASO SOUTH OF VIJILIYA BABA POKHARA, P.S. BUXER, DISTRICT BUXER………………………………………………..……………………..……PETITIOENR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER- CUM-SECRETARY, MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. MR. KAMLESHWAR PD. SINGH, DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. MR. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 4. MR.KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMA, THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, LAKHISARAI 5. MR. RAMANAND PRASAD, THE DISTRICT EUDCATION OFFICER, MUNGER 6. MR.RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, THE DITRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, BUXER. 7. MR. DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, LAKHISARAI 8. MR. SANJAY KUMAR, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUNGER 9. MRS. SARITA LAL, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BUXER 10. MR. SHIV KUMAR SHAIV, THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICEER, BUXER……….… CONTEMNOR-OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- - 2 - 4. 03.02.2009 It is an admitted position now that representation which was filed by the petitioners pursuant to the order dated 1.6.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6105 of 2007, did not contain the necessary details, as required by this Court. Therefore, no fault can be found with the rejection of the said representation of the petitioners by the District Education Officer, Lakhisarai which he has done by Annexure-A to the show cause after receiving guidelines from the Human Resources Development Department. As such, no case of contempt is made out in the matter. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. However, the petitioners are given liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned with all necessary details for reconsideration of their cases. If such representation is filed, the authority concerned shall pass order on the same in accordance with law within three months from the date of filing of the representation. - 3 - It is made clear that any order passed on the representation, if adverse to the petitioners, shall only be a new cause of action to the petitioners B.T. (J.N.Singh, J.)