^,^-ie-RFNCT @ ^^^- v-^'ft^^""^ •:°h:PI c."-.r^'a'^ •v^'^^"" &^1^'2' IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. No.^^^ ^72005 ^ t^^ PETITIONER Budhantin Bai ^f/o- ShriTulsi Rain Teli Aged about 57 years R/o Vmage AchhoU Tahsil Khairgarh Distt- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS >1) 2) State of Chhattisgarh Through. Secretary PubUc Works Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer PubUc Works Department ( B/R) Sub Division Dongargarh Distt- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA. XI-RC-22 ^^ -qi^i^i4, '^^^i<o; 'N^rray Q '^rowi'w^iw ^3^^^T -^ ^^r" -STF^T^T t^ri^STit^T ^RT^^T^T ^T^T ^zaT^T Tff^T 14-12..2005 Sliii Anoop Majuitidar, Cousisel fo| Sliri Sandeep Dubey, Go"^/t. Adv... ^orthe State. Hsard. ^^R^Tf ^ fe^t Tf^SR '^'^T^I^T^T !f the petitioner. Coynsd-'fbr the petitioner submits ffia.t iii bat.ch of cases, mcludmg o'thers -v- •State of ChliattisRarh arid otiie 2005. ,: . jthat the. ma-tter rela.tes-to gang man.- He further JW.P. No. 1722/2003 (MoiianlalDadsena and l<s); orders have been passed on. 15Eh September Tlw Sfate Coimsel is not m a pos% Counsel for the petitioner submite| but they have. nQt gwen. .the relfef as then beenfilecl In the..order dated 15-9-2005 pass; the gang- men who have not c-ompl M t.o dispute tliis fact. • ' . / . ' . that the petitioner approached to the authonties is no court order; Accordmgly'fhis pe-tition has d in.W.P. No. 1722/2003 in batch ofc.ases.'tiie Coii-rt has held as under:" •' ' . . : L: "3................Puiport of tlie orcjer is quite clear and unambiguous as it appears from the pemsal ofthe orcler as ^jeU a.s from the contentions of the petitioners that eted the age of60 years a:s ori 30-03'-2005, they .wffl. be allowed to contmue till th^y attam the. age of 60-years. It is mfoimed by llie leamed counsel for' th€ petitiJ3ners(s). that some- of the gang'men. who have already': rctired 'on •completion -cjf 30.;vears of. senice, have been pa.id reiiral .benefite i.e. gi'atuiUr only. Tliis ^jill be usifa.ii', if^ the petitiQners; who have re&ed- before 30-03-2Q05 on completio|< some years to go before 60 year^ ^gang men. who faad rctired' on ^ |i of 30 years of sendce, thougli'they have stiU of age, are not given benefit of order dated 30°- 03-2005., . • . 4. For .the re.asons stated .ab^ve., the respondents. are dii?ected to ailow all the .ompletion of 30' yea.rs 'of'sendce but ha'v'e not [Tft^ ^f?^^F XI-HC-22 ^nt^T'^T l^ri'^^Tr^T ^RN"^ft^f "-s^^* H/- r^ '^ ? -3^ '^TPTT^P?, ^ T?i^^l <o, f^TRTy :;M 632 •^I^^T^W^ attamed the age" of ,60 :y©ars^to . age of'60 yea.rs, subject t.o'deposit (5) Iii some of the petitions, theii' senices as Gang man. Le< sa.id prayer be disniissedas nbt p to 'the petitioners to raise.'fhe.issi if necessaty. The - petitions ' wi disiTiisse-d as not pressed with -lib- r^dressal' of the. relie.f -of regulariz^ (6) ' 'fll MCW Of the- foregoi mdicated above. The respondenl witlwi a period of Uvo months - order.No orcler as to costs,?? •».'•' .' ^ TMs .petition also. stands aUowsd The respondents are farther • directe4 t<^ months from.the date of co'minumc.atioii/j C.c..aspermles. ^OTf^ft^ ^TTR^f ^ 'f^^t <f^f^R iT3T^R^T?^T 4join tli'e senices and coiitmuc till they atta.m the ijig the re&al benefits, if any, gi^^n to them. . Ihe petitioners have prayed fot reguladzation of liied counsd for the petitioners subtiiit that the sssed .a.t present. However, the liberty.be granted- ^ of regularization before the appropriate fomm, ti .rsgard. to the prayer of regularizatmn are |rt^7 to the petitioners to-faise the dispute seeking tion, ifnecessary, befbre the appropriate forum. ^ the' petitions stand '.allowed. to the extent s.are further dii'ected to comply wifh tiiis order Ifrom the date of receipt//commumcatioii of this to the extent of.ordar passed in W.P. 1722/2003. comply with the orclers withm a period.offt^o ^roduction.oftlrisorder. :"., . . , ' Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^N^f^r ^