IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13780 of 2010 RAJESH KUMAR RAI SON OF LATE MAHESHWAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. On 17.9.2009 the petitioner was refused bail earlier considering that the petitioner had been identified by the informant at the test identification parade. The report of the trial court has been received, from which it appears that the Court had received the records on 9.2.2010 and thereafter notices have been issued to the witnesses and it is expected that the trial would be over by six months. In view of such, I am not inclined to review my earlier order. The prayer for bail is rejected once again. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and consider Sections 62 and 66 Cr.P.C. into service for expeditious disposal of the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )