vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.574 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.574 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.574 OF 2006 Pandharinath Umaji Bhakre ... Appellant V/s. Shri Vithal Umaji Bhakre & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.N.V. Vechalekar for Appellant Mr.N.P. Deshpande for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JULY 5, 2007 JULY 5, 2007 JULY 5, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The appellant urges that a substantial question of law arises in this appeal, namely whether the entry of the appellant’s name in the revenue records confers a right, title and interest on the appellant with regard to the suit property. It is trite law that the revenue records do not confer title on the person whose name is included in the revenue records nor are they proof of the person’s ownership of the property. Both the courts below have held that the plaintiff-appellant has not been able to prove his title to the property before partition or that he was legally possessed of the suit property. There is no need to entertain the appeal since there are concurrent finding of facts of the both the Courts below. : 2 : 2. Appeal dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, nothing survives in Civil Application No.2265 of 2005 and the same is dismissed.