:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3940 OF 1991 The State of Maharashtra .. Petitioner. Vs. Abdul Aziz Mohamed Ibrahim Muckba & Ors. .. Respondents. And Anwar Shahbazkar & Ors. .. Applicants. Mr.Vaibhav Jogalekar i/b M/s.Basant Tilokani & Co. for the applicants. Mr.V.A.Solanki for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General with Mr.S.R.Nargolkar for the State. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : APRIL 3, 2006. DATED : APRIL 3, 2006. DATED : APRIL 3, 2006. P.C: . The first prayer in this application does not survive and so far as the second prayer is concerned, we direct the learned A.G.P. to place before us the reports submitted by the Expert committees and which reports were referred to in the order dated 15.10.1993 passed in civil application no.2232 of 2003 at the time of final hearing. So far as other record and files are concerned they seem to be on the basis of legal opinion received by the Government. Such opinions do not matter in deciding the case, and therefore, :2: :2: :2: we do not deem it appropriate to issue directions to the State Government as prayed for. 2. Civil application is disposed off accordingly. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)