IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1629 OF 2007 Sou. Hemlata Dilip Jain .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Sarvasri R.S. Kate i/b R.D. Suryawanshi for the Petitioner. Shri M.S. Mhambre, APP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: SEPTEMBER 06, 2007 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The only relief which is sought for in the present petition is in the nature of direction to the investigating officer to record certain further statements. Undisputedly, the chargesheet has already been filed and the Magistrate’s Court is already seized with the matter. In the circumstances, the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy in the form of proceedings under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In view of the same, there is no question of interference in writ jurisdiction and hence the petition is rejected. (Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/S7cwp1629.7 sjs/S7cwp1629.7 sjs/S7cwp1629.7