iTITSONER e3(~ii'»inc^ WnjPetition IS} No. 16S1 of 2007 Louis Toppo, Sio Shri Carolus Toppo, aged about 64 years, Retsred Head Master (Education Department), Mia'die Schooi, R/o Viilaae L'Dti, P.0. KHkiia. Biock & Tah. Dharsmjaigarh, District Raigarh (CG). versus ^! \ ^'^^'^-^. ^^^ ?^^t ^<^4i^'of*as'rtt?r^ ¥5A!:l*Agi£^l^4y1^ ^-^if^yf;^'^^ li.i&ycaEH, uuyuyji .yi^ osiui^s.caiy, P:ri< !flss?!ftn r^&r^'s ?t*vs s'yi f^ ^ ^ Rh^vA/^i Ll.SW; i i-/<i?^^3 i.5 j SSri si., E^.!\.^i^. i^il&fev&ASij ^5-S?^i<r -^a'pu? ^t.3,1. 2) The Coilector, District Raigarh (CG). 3) District Education Officsr, District Raigarh (CG). 4) Ths Joint Director, Fund Account and Pension, Biiaspur (CG). 'it Petition unasr Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of india) Sinale Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. >enf: Mr. Bhupendra Sinah. Advocate for the Detitioner. Mr. Pankai Shrivastava. PaneS Lawvsr for the State. 14- ^ 1©3,^fi©HiSZZSf fS nsa Ip^%%^?^ 0^ this 2 M^rch, 20Q91 Wlth consent of Searned counsel appearing for the parti Fieara tinally. 2) Learned counsei appsaring for the petmoner submifs that the case, bemg payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 3) Thls Court, in ths matter oTW.P.No.4642'2004 (Baijnath IVSandai Vs. The Staie of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of reiria' dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, ~r1.! s?°-s; ?sina' ^ ^h'a n?'H^?[ -^ a's''&','*^ 'l Q-f^S-''7r:niS ri-S!<c%af'4 ;?*° ^.^^ ^ t\^f~i '^'^^^/'^:ST1^ i'.^T^* y^Si •SUSSl 13. -^ i.1 1-3 Ui iw;^3i '-3S^'G*u; 3 •5f~s^iut''.i£.'<«?U\/ i^Ci.-O-OOU l.ii •ii "sf ,i- 1,1 'itV. ; •w?^.' i f A.WW^ ^'>-;Ei ii>. ^»;/^ ^^^"tt f^]^^"h v^ ^Vf^^^^*^^r \/^?' ^^ *^^^t;^» ^^ ^=^^ ^/^?~ T^ u^*»£n^"?r^ /^i^* ^^^ ^t ^-•'S4^t(t^''^-^ ^'^t J**t?>*?7^ ^^.^J">Lfh-0^ /S ^" ?\g|& SS^i 'LfilffHQI'S.KSf VS. CsiS^S ^sovsmriisni or onnsii;is?^m sni.1 cii:ri©i'^h s3.n1s order dated 13-3-2008 passed i" M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers Vs. Baljnath Mandai and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered bythejudgment and oroer dated 31" Januaiy, 2008 passsd 1 ^ Gcwri z/- in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mancial counsel appearing for the parties. (supra) as submitted bv iearned 4) This petstion is accordingiy disposed of sn t'ne same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case to the Commitiee, wiihin s period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy ofthls order as v/eil as a copy of the petition from the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shatl issue notice to t'ne oetitioner and officers concerned within a Turthsr period of 15 davs. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance wsth iaw, after affordlng proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Ths petitianer and the officsrs concernsd may fiie additionai docurrients, if necessary. The entire sxereise, includtng psvmsnt of retiral dues, if any. to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months frorn the date of recelpt of a copy of this order. 5) The petitioner shaii suppiy one compiete set of ti counsel for transfsmna the sam®to t'ne Committee. itition to the State 6) in case of grievance wiih regard to non-payment of pensionary dues, it is not necessar/ fo fiie a writ petition be'fore fhis Court directiy. Tha representation/app'icat'ion can be moved before the Pension Committee as stated above. Tha Pension Committee shali not refuse to entertain the representation/appiication, if so filed directty. 7) On the request of learneQ' recoverv shail not be macie tili committee. »eifor the psiltioner, ix is directed that the the disposai of the case by the pension Consequently, ai! the pending app'itcacons stand disposed of. Sd/- SatistiKAgniIiotn - Judge '^ -