((-1-)) MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1060 OF 1991 The State of Maharashtra Appellant versus Hanif Ibrahim Navadekar Respondent Mr.G.P.Mulekar, AGP for appellant. Mr.Sachin Punde i/by Rajiv Patil for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26th February 2007 PC : 1. Heard learned AGP for the appellant and the learned advocate for the respondent. By this First Appeal the appellant State has taken exception to the judgement and award dated 5th November 1990 passed by the District Court in Land Acquisition Reference No.390 of 1986. By the impugned judgement and award the Reference Court has partly allowed the reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2. The learned advocate for the respondent states that the respondent had preferred an appeal challenging the impugned judgement and ((-2-)) MST award. He states that the said appeal being First Appeal No.111 of 1992 has been allowed by this Court on 23nd March 2006 by granting enhancement in compensation in favour of the respondent. The statement made by the advocate for the respondent is accepted. 3. In view of the said statement, there is no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed. (A.S.OKA, J.)