-^ @ APPELLANT APPLSCANT HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FSB: Hon'bie Mr.T.P.Sharma.J.l MAllo,09/2003. Asharam Sahu son of Girdhari Sahu Viilage Chhote Kusuml, Post rv1usara, RESPQNDENTS. NON APpLlQANTS Tahsil Dongargarh, Rajnandgaon. DJStriCt VERSUS 1. 2. Unlted Webs Concrete Sieeper Piant, indira Nagar, Post Dongargah, District Rajnandgaon through Managing Partner. Orientai Jnsurance Companv throuah Branch Manager, Orienta! Insurance Company, Dura, CG. G. X- f •V Mr. Pankaj Agrawai, counsel for the appellant. APPEAL UNDERSECTION 30 OF THE ACT (ORAL)ORDER (18.03.2009) IV1.C.P. No. 33/2003 for condonation of delay of 12 days in fiting the appeai is aiiowed. Deiay condoned. 2. This appeai is directed against the award dated 1 1.10.2002 passed by the Labour Court, Durg in Case No. 12A/V.C. Act (NFV2001. AppeiianVcJaimant filed the claim petition for compensatlon towards Injury received by him during empioyment, After assesslng the cialm, the Labour Court, Rajnandaaon, awarded the compensation of Rs. 80,000 with interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum from the date of fiiing of claim petition. 3. The award is chaiienged on the ground that the Labour Cou}l, Rajnandgaon, has assessed the amount'of compensation at Rs.' 1,00,957,05 but has v/rongiy awarded the comp.ensation of Rs. 80,000. The Court below has also not awarded the interest. from the date of acc.ident but has awarded the same from the date of ciaim petition i.e. 22.1 .2001. 4. Heard counse! for the appellant and perused the Impugned award. 5. Labour Court after assessing the ciaim has come to the conciuslon that the appellant is entltied for Rs. 1,00,957.05 but as the appellant has clalmed V... Rs. 80,000 as compensatlon, therefore, it has awarded. Rs«80,000 as compensatlon. Appeiiant has filed the ciaim petition on 22.1.2001 in respect of the accident which occurred on 29.12.1997. The Court below has awarded the interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum from the date of applicatjon, Court beiow has not committed any i!!egaiity in awarding Rs, 80,000 as compensation and the interest from the date of applicetlon. 6. i do not find any ground forjnterference in the impugned award. Accordingiy, the appeal being without substance is liabie to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. 7. No order as to cost'. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge n^^ y-