IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1221 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1221 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1221 OF 2005 Dharam Raj Gupta ...Petitioner versus The Union of India and anr...... Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada ) Court‘s or Judge‘s Orders or directions and ) Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.P.Saxena for petitioner. Sureshkumar with D.A.Dube for Respdt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & D.B. D.B. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 19TH SEPT., 2005 19TH SEPT., 2005 19TH SEPT., 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting the original application of the petitioner whereby he had questioned his non promotion. 2. The tribunal has considered all the submissions made before it in para 7 of the order. The tribunal non-suited the petitioner on two grounds. (i) that his application suffers from non-joinder of necessary parties and (ii) the departmental promotional committee which was presided over by member of the UPSC have considered the record of the petitioner and they have gone through the ACR folder and then the tribunal has found after inspecting the record of the petitioner that there is no reason for any judicial intervention with the decision of the departmental promotional committee. There is no legal or judicial error committed by the tribunal. The rejection is also proper. We therefore see no reason to interfere. Petition is accordingly dismissed. *****