1 mss NMS2534 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2534 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3641 OF 2007 EAST COAST DISTRIBUTORS PVT.LTD... PLAINTIFF Vs. SEAGRAM INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. .. DEFENDANTS Mr. P. J. Pandit for the plaintiff CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 5/12/2011 P.C. Heard learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff. 2. The suit of the plaintiff is dismissed for non-removal of office objections, by the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this court by taking recourse to Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules. 3. The order is an ex parte order. The plaintiff’s advocate has stated that on account of some renovation and repair works in his office, the papers in 2 mss NMS2534 this suit were lost and that is why he could not remove the office objections. 4. This notice of motion is duly served on the defendants and a vakalatnama is filed on behalf of defendant No. 1 by Mr. Rajiv V. Talasikar and his name is duly shown on the board. 5. In these circumstances, the order passed by the Prothonotary is set aside and the suit is restored to the file of this court. Office objections shall be removed within a period of two weeks from today. No order as to costs. 6. However, this does not preclude the defendants from raising appropriate pleas on the point of limitation, maintainability of the claim of the plaintiff, jurisdiction of this court, so also on merits. All contentions of both parties in that behalf are kept open. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)