IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT APPEAL NO : 1949 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 16/11/2004 in WP No : 20448 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Toorupunoori Ravi, S/o.Shankaraiah, R/o. Peepalpahad, Choutuppal Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Mahaboobnagar Division, Mahaboobnagar post & District. 2. The Prohibition & Excise, Inspector, station House, Officer, Chandoor Post, Nalgonda District. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.E.V.BHAGIRATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Sudershan Reddy) This Court, in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, cannot interfere with such discretionary order as the one passed by the learned Single Judge directing release of the seized vehicle on certain conditions. If the conditions require any modifications, it shall always be open to the appellant to file a review petition and seek indulgence of the learned single Judge. We are not inclined to interfere with the order. The Writ Appeal shall accordingly stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J. Date:13-12-2004 _________________ C.V. RAMULU, J. GS/KS To 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Mahaboobnagar Division, Mahaboobnagar post & District. 2. The Prohibition & Excise, Inspector, station House, Officer, Chandoor Post, Nalgonda District. 3. The G.P. for Prohibition and Excise, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T.) 4. Two CD copies