IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-17788 of 2009 Date of decision:07.07.2009. Shranjeet Kaur and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Jatinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have got married against the wishes of respondent No.4 – Surjit Ram son of Shri Manna Ram (father of petitioner No.1), respondent No.5 – Parveen Kaur wife of Shri Surjit Ram (mother of petitioner No.1) and respondent No.6 – Malkiat Singh son of Shri Manna Ram (uncle/Taya of petitioner No.1), and there is threat to their lives and liberty from them. He contends that the petitioners have already made a representation dated 04.07.2009 (Annexure P-5) before the Superintendent of Police, Muktsar, giving therein the details about the apprehension of the petitioners. He submits that they would be satisfied, if a direction be issued to Superintendent of Police, Muktsar, District Muktsar, to look into the matter and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Without going into the merits of the case and the assertions as made by counsel for the petitioners, a direction is issued to the Superintendent of Police, Muktsar, District Muktsar, to look into the representation dated 04.07.2009 (Annexure P-5), preferred by the petitioners and take necessary steps in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. July 07, 2009. ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) vinod JUDGE