IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29873 of 2001 GOPALKRISHNA DAMODAR SHANBAG Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 18.8.2010. Heard Sri N.K.Agrawal, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. I have just delivered an order in Cr.Misc.Petition No.29872 of 2001 and I have recorded that Rule 32(i)came into force on the Ist of September, 2000. The food product marketed under the brand name Glucovita(Glucose- D), admittedly, was packed in April, 2000. As Rule 32(i)came into force on the Ist of September, 2000, as per the Public Analyst’s Report and as per admitted fact, there could not be any violation of Rule 31(i)of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. In the above light, the whole proceeding initiated on Complaint Case No.1(M) of 2001, Tr.Case No.1753 of 2001 passed by the S.D.J.M., Patna Sadar is hereby quashed. The petition is allowed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )