IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 14716 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 11, 2011 Ranbir Singh ….Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 have not taken any decision on the representation (Annexure P/1), therefore, they be directed to take decision thereon, within such time as fixed by this Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are directed to take decision on the representation (Annexure P/1) within 60 days from the date certificate copy of this order is placed before them, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. August 11, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge