IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41184 of 2010 Binay Jha, Son of Late Bishambhar Jha, Resident of Hari Vatika Chowk, P.S. – Bettiah Mufassil, District – West Champaran. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ravindra Kumar @ Phani, Son of Late Lal Bahadur Prasad. 3. Kavindra Kumar @ Guddu, Son of Late Lal Bahadur Prasad. 4. Sunil Kumar, Son of Late Lal Bahadur Prasad. All resident of Hari Vatika Chowk, P.S. – Bettiah Mufassil, District – West Champaran. …..Opposite Parties. ----------- 02/ 24.08.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this application against the order dated 23.11.2009, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in G.R. No. 312 of 2009 arising out of Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No. 300 of 2009 under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code by which the accused-opposite party nos. 2 to 4 have been granted bail. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after grant of bail by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate the accused are interfering with the proceeding and they are also threatening the informant. The accused have got the file disappeared and after great pursuance the file has been reconstructed. Learned Counsel for the State 2 submits that the petitioner has not made a complaint that can be entertained by the learned Judicial Magistrate where the case is pending. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is at liberty to make complaint before the learned Magistrate where the aforesaid case is pending, in case such complaint is made then the learned Magistrate will take suitable action against the accused. This petition stands disposed of. kksinha/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)