CM No. 11319-C of 2011 & 1 RSA No.1368 of 1990 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CM No. 11319-C of 2011 & RSA No.1368 of 1990 Date of decision:- 06.12.2011 Surja (deceased) through LRs ....Appellants Vs. Surta (deceased) through LRs and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. G.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1/applicant. Mr. Rajiv Saini, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 7. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) CM No. 11319-C of 2011 For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. RSA No. 1368 of 1990 The trial Court, vide judgment dated 28.07.1987, had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff-Surta, whereas the other plaintiffs (i.e. Plaintiff Nos. 2 to 7) had withdrawn from the suit. However, on appeal filed by Surta, he impleaded them as proforma respondent Nos. 2 to 7 and challenged the judgment passed by the trial Court, upon which, the Additional District CM No. 11319-C of 2011 & 2 RSA No.1368 of 1990 Judge, Sonepat, vide judgment dated 10.05.1990, accepted the appeal and declared Surta to be the 'dohlidar' in possession of the suit property to the extent of 1/3rd share and other plaintiffs i.e. respondent Nos. 2 to 7, who are heirs of Dharam Dass, were also declared to be 'dohlidar' in possession of 1/3rd share out of the suit property. Plaintiffs also do not dispute that defendant No.1- respondent is the 'dohlidar' in possession of remaining 1/3rd share of the suit property. Since no specific decree was passed, declaring defendant No.1 as the 'dohlidar' in possession of 1/3rd share, they have compromised with each other and have tendered the written compromise effected between the parties, which is placed on record as Annexure A-1. The counsel for the parties state that the compromise was reduced into writing and according to the said compromise, the plaintiff-respondent No.1 is the 'dohlidar' in possession to the extent of 1/3rd share, plaintiff Nos. 2 to 7 are in possession of 1/3rd share and the appellants i.e. legal heirs of Surja are the 'dohlidar' in possession of remaining 1/3rd share of the suit land. Joint statement of legal heirs of Surja has been recorded in this regard separately. In view of the statement as well as compromise (Annexure A-1) effected between the parties, this appeal stands disposed of accordingly. Compromise (Annexure A-1) would form part of this order. (A.N.JINDAL) December 06, 2011 JUDGE ajp