IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2007 of 2007 Date of decision:09.03.2009 Karam Singh ...Petitioner versus Charan Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Vij, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is against the concurrent orders passed in application for injunction dismissing the application for interim injunction. 2. It is brought to my notice that the suit itself had been taken up for trial and it is at the last stage awaiting the conclusion at the trial by posting the case for arguments on 20.03.2009. However, a third party appears to have also filed a petition for impleadment. Under such circumstances, I do not deem it necessary to consider the revision on merits. 3. Needless to state that the order passed by the Courts below shall have no bearing to the ultimate result in the suit which is concluded after evidence and at the time when it is taken up for arguments. Civil Revision No.2007 of 2007 - 2 - 4. It is also brought to my notice that there is another suit which is directed to be disposed of simultaneously along with the suit from which the revision is brought before this Court. Both the suits will stands disposed of by due consideration of evidence in accordance with law. 5. The Civil Revision is disposed of in the above terms. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 09.03.2009 sanjeev