IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2008 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 37607 of 2007(B) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. RAMAN, S/O.AYYAN, AGED 55 YEARS, MANKUZHI VEEDU, ARUKALICKAL PADINJARE MURI, EZHAMKULAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 2. KOCHIKA, W/O.RAMAN, AGED 50 YEARS, MANKUZHI VEEDU, ARUKALICKAL PADINJARE MURI, EZHAMKULAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.B.BALRAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. RAJAN, S/O.ADICHAN, VALLIYETHU HOUSE, KANAMKODU MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE. 4. UTHAMAN, S/O.KALI, VALLIYETHU HOUSE, KANAMKODU MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE. 5. ANIYAN, S/O.KUTTI, THENGUMVILAYIL HOUSE, KADIGA MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 37607/07-B APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.12.2007 GIVEN BY THE FIRST PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Writ Petition (C) No.37607 of 2007-B -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judgment Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioners have approached this court, seeking a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to grant protection to the life of the petitioners and their family members from the alleged illegal actions of respondents 3 to 5. A statement has been filed by the second respondent stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled and at present, there is no law and order problem warranting protection from the side of the police. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the submission made in the said statement that the petitioner is employed by Advocate Shaji, is incorrect. Recording the submission of the second respondent in the above said statement that the dispute between the parties has been settled, the Writ Petition is closed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE 10.04.2008 P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE 2 sta