..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3146 OF 2008 1. Ranjit Narayan Deshmukh, 2. Prashant Narayan Deshmukh, 3. Smt.Surekha Narayan Deshmukh, & 4. Sou.Nandini Prashant Deshmukh. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Ajay A. Joshi, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th September, 2008. DATED : 11th September, 2008. DATED : 11th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.175 of 2008 of Sangola Police Station, District : Solapur. The said case is mainly under Sections 498A, 306 of IPC. 3. Deceased Jyoti was married to brother of applicant Nos.1 & 2. Applicant No.3 is the mother of applicant Nos.1 & 2 and applicant No.4 is the ..(2).. wife of applicant No.2. The case of the complainant is that the applicants used to ill-treat and harass his daughter Jyoti. It is stated that the applicants along with Ajit the husband of Jyoti harassed her, as her parents had given cheap articles in the marriage. In the complaint, it is specifically stated that Jyoti was assaulted by the applicants when Jyoti was pregnant. On account of this, injury was caused to the foetus hence an abortion had to be performed. 4. During the course of investigation the statement of the Doctor who performed the operation has been recorded. The Doctor has specifically stated that Jyoti came to be admitted in the hospital as there was pain in her stomach. Sonography was done. The Sonography report showed that the head of the foetus was very large and there was a growth on the spinal cord of the foetus. No injury was seen to the foetus, but, on account of the abnormal growth of the foetus it was decided to perform abortion. Looking to this fact, there appears much merit in the submission of the learned Advocate for the applicants that the applicants have been falsely implicated by the ..(3).. complainant. Looking to this fact, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. 4. The applicants- Ranjit Narayan Deshmukh, Prashant Narayan Deshmukh, Smt.Surekha Narayan Deshmukh, & Sou.Nandini Prashant Deshmukh to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand Only) each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Sangola Police Station once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)