CRM No. M 16933 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 16933 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.07.2010 Mukhtiar Singh and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) The only prayer made in this petition is that the life and liberty of the petitioners be protected at the hands of respondent No. 5, who is stated to be interested party in the present litigation. In pursuance to the order dated 04.06.2010 passed by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Nirmal Singh Dhillon, IPS, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bathinda Range, Bathinda on behalf of respondent No. 2 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. Copy of the same has also been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector-Sangram Singh, states that neither any complaint nor any FIR has been registered against the present petitioners. The petitioners are also not required by the CRM No. M 16933 of 2010 2 Police in any inquiry and that the petitioners shall not be harassed by respondent No. 5. In view of the aforesaid statement, no further order is required to be made. Disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be supplied to the learned State Counsel under the signatures of the Reader attached to the Bench of this Court. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 12.07.2010 mohan