BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16749 of 2011 L.LOORTHU SURESH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, CR.NO.2307/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.R.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A-1 in Crime No.2307 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, for offence under Sections 448, 324, 307 I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act. The petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 01.12.2011. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2. Heard Mr.R.R.Kannan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. Accordingl to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions likely to be imposed by this Court in the event of granting bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the petitioner is a history sheeted rowdy. Therefore, if the petitioner is released on bail, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5. I have considered the above submissions. 6. Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 01.12.2011 onwards. Considering the above https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ said facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. 7. In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions :- (i) The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai; and (ii) the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and appear before the cantonment police station daily twice i.e., morning at 10.30 a.m., and evening at 5.30 p.m., until further orders. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. 6. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.R.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.44884 SR : 22.12.2011 : 2P/8C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16749 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/