IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 923 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 5, 2010 Harbans Lal …Appellant Versus The Labour Court, Jalandhar and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The appellant is in appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 7.8.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 1829 of 2000, dismissing the writ petition. It has been categorically found that the appellant did not have any right to the post as he had worked only for less than 90 days. Learned Single Judge has rightly opined that no right of the appellant could be considered to have been violated by the respondents. No interference in the letters patent appeal would be warranted. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) August 5, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2