mm“: yum @ /@ 1 W U ” ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(S)No. 105% Hodgv : Ramdulari Shr-ivas, 5/0. Shri Late Bhaiyq Ram Shrivas, aged PETITIONER WRIT PETITION uNDER ARTICLE 22% OF THE l CONsTITUTION OF INDIA FOR IssUANCE OF WRIT IN i NATURE QF MANDAmus CERTIORARI OF ANy OTHER l WRIT OF LIKE NATURE The peTiTioner mos’r humbly‘begs To submi'r as under:- / [gg/%\g(\9f 6W abou’r 39 year‘s, Working as Assistanf Teacher, Gov‘r. ’ } { a \ § 9 l Primary School - Dongaama, ‘yv’xw‘f: Block - KarTala, Dish”. - Korba " ¢ § ‘ f (ca) 7‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. S’rafe of Chha‘r‘i’isgarh Through The Secre’rary Deparfmehf of (a; Sohool Education D.K.S. Bhawah, ‘ ‘/' (IL N¢$§ x Manfralaya Raipur (6.6.) ofg 2. The Disfric’r EducaTion Officer, K Dish‘. - Elaspur(C.G.) . Assisfom‘ Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deparfmenf Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Educa‘l’ion Officer, Block 4 Korba, Karfalo, Kafghora Disff. — Korbo (C.G.) RESPONDENTS / 1. S’rafe of Chha‘r‘i’isgarh Through The Secre’rary Deparfmehf of (a; Sohool Education D.K.S. Bhawah, ‘ ‘/' (IL N¢$§ x Manfralaya Raipur (6.6.) ofg 2. The Disfric’r EducaTion Officer, K Dish‘. - Elaspur(C.G.) . Assisfom‘ Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deparfmenf Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Educa‘l’ion Officer, Block 4 Korba, Karfalo, Kafghora Disff. — Korbo (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILA5PUR W. P15} No. 1063 of 2007 Pe‘fifianer : Ramdulnri Shrivus Versus Respondern‘s : S'l’ai'e of Chhaf‘i’isgarh an& o‘i'her's SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusi’ice Sai‘ish K. Agniho'l'ri, J Present Mr. Ami? Kumar Sharma, Advocate for fhe petitionér. Ms. Deepa!i Pandey, Panel Lawyer for S'fufe/mspondenfs. ORDER (Passed on fhis 26*“ Day of February, 2007) 1. The pe'ri'i'ioner was appoin'red vide order dated 19-1—1990 (P/l) as Assis'l'an? Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. Affer compie‘Hon of one year probe-lion, she was gmn'red reguiar pay smie of Rs. 975-1650/-. . Learned counsei appearing for ‘i'he pe'm'ioner submifs fha'r The issue involved in 'lhe cue? is as'fo whe’fher‘, 'i’he pefi'lioner is eri'fifled 1‘0 regular pay scale w.e.f. The da‘re of ini'fial appoin'fmen'l’ or from The dafe of complefioa of [orobafion period. . The issue irwolved, herein was considered by 'i’he Madhya Pmdesl'i Sfafe Adminis‘ira'five Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukanf Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. S‘m‘i’e of MP. & o‘rhers), wherein if was held Tha'i' fhe similarly sifua‘l'ed “teachers are en’ii'rled fo regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe dafe of ini'i'ial appoin‘imenf. The maffer was faken up fa fhe Hon'ble Supreme Courf in Special Leave Pe-ri‘Hon (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said pe-ri-rion was dismissed by +he Hon'ble Suprema Cour? upholding fhe decision of The Tribum! 1’0 'fhe zffecf Thu? 1he Teachers/Assisfan‘r Teacher‘s are en'ti‘Hed f0 regular pay scale from da'l’e of inifinl appoin‘fmem, . Learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioner fur-Ther- submiTs ThaT This Couri, while considering the same issue in Sushi! Tiwari & oi’hers Vs. S‘m'l'e Govt of Chha'i'i'isgarh & o‘i'hers (WP. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order da'ied 7-11-2006, has granied reguior pay scoie w.e.f. The daTe of iriiTiai appoinTmenT. . Learned counsei appearing for The parTies joinTly submiT ThaT This case is squarely covered by The decision of This CourT in The case of Sushil Tiwari & o‘ihers Vs. 5TaTe GovT. of ChhaTTisgnrh & oThers (5upra). . In view of Thai 'rhis pe‘i'i'i'ion is ailowed in The some 'i’erms. No order as To cosTs. i I l l Sd/- i {Satish K.Agnihotri Subhosh Judge l i i l