IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11707 of 2008 Decided on: 22.6.2011 Keshav Ram …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and another. …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate, For the respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has been regularized, however, he has not been given the correct designation of Additional Junior Engineer. He prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent- Board seeking correct designation from the due date, within a period of two weeks from today. 2. In the eventuality of the representation being made by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the Secretary of the respondent-Board in accordance with law, within a further period of four weeks. 3. Consequently, with the directions/observations made hereinabove, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 22, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No