CRLR No.171/10 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Raman Kumar Sah, Adv. for the revisionist. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. For the reasons stated, delay condonation application 978 of 2010 is allowed. Delay in filing the revision is condoned. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he does not want to press the instant revision which has been preferred against the ex parte order dated 27.8.2009 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Pauri Garhwal. He further submitted that he has already moved an application u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C. for setting aside the aforesaid ex parte order, which is still pending before the court below. He further submitted that the trial court may be directed to decide the aforesaid application u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C. In view of the above statement, the instant revision is dismissed as not pressed with the observation that the trial court may decide the aforesaid application of the revisionist moved u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C. pending before him, if any, within a period of three months. (D.V., J.) 23.09.2010 Rajeev Dang