IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN : PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 17606 of 2002 Between: Divyanagar Plot Owners Association, 4-52, Divyanagar, Kachwanisingaram, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Regd. No. 6167/99, Registered under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli (Act 1 of 1350F), Rep. by its President Sri Nalla Malla Reddy, S/o. Sri Sai Reddy, R/o. Kachwanisingaram, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... Petitioner AND 1. Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-223, Paigah Palace, Police Lines, Begumpet, Secunderabad, rep. by its Vice-Chairman. 2. The Govt. of A.P., rep. by the Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad. (R2 is impleaded as per Court order dated: 20-01-2003 in WP. No. 17606 of 2002) .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the order in letter No. 9847/P7/RL/Plg./H/98, dated: 01-05-2002, issued by the respondent rejecting regularization of lay-out in Sy. Nos. 50, 51 parts, 52, 53 and 54 parts of Kachwanisingaram Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, unjunst, without jurisdiction, colorable exercise of power and contrary to its earlier orders and consequently set aside the order of the respondent in letter No. 9847/P7/RL/Plg./H/98, dated: 01-05-2002; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 20-01-2003, 27-03-2003 & 12-04- 2010 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Srinivas Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri M. Dhananjay Reddy, Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and the G.P. for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for the Respondent No. 2, the Court made the following ORDER: “The Director Planning of Hyderabad Metropolitan Authority has appeared. Across the Bar, it is stated that the petitioner has since provided the facilities, such as drainage and electricity lines and that there is shortage of open space. The Director of Planning of H.M.D.A shall visit the site and within one week from today, he shall inform the petitioner in writing as to the nature of deficiencies that are to be complied with by him. The petitioner, in turn, shall comply with the same, including the provision of deficit open space within a period of four (4) weeks thereafter. Post on 31-05-2010”. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Vice-Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-223, Paigah Palace, Police Lines, Begumpet, Secunderabad. 2. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Govt. of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The Director of Planning, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Hyderabad. (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER) 4. One CC to Sri S. Srinivas Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One CC to Sri M. Dhananjaya Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two CCs to the G.P. for Municipal Administration, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 7. One spare copy. Ksv HIGH COURT Ksv Date of drafting: 20-04-2010 LNRJ DATE: 19-04-2010 NOTE: POST ON 31-05-2010 ORDER WP. NO. `7606 OF 2002 DIRECTION