c^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^2-<> / 2011 PETITIONER ^^^%>^ ,.~:^^^ ^•- RESPONDENTS Smt. Jasvir Deol W/o Shri Amrik Singh Deol, Aged about 52 years, Occupation - Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Kurud Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) r 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur , (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sy^^'\ "7 ^ ^'T^^. B V\ ^Si'' j" K ^/ £/^~ :"\. '^sS"^'/'^' .3ss€^y '<fe, ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRtT PETITION ?S) N0. 925 OF 2011 Smt. Jasvir Deol Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petltion under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Singte Bench : Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Present:- Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushii Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 14th day of February, 2011 ) 1. Heard learned counsel for the partles. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of the fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination before entering into the service, at her own cost. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra. as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxsna v. Stste of M.P. & Ors. as we!l as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Coiporation, Durg and anothe^ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and anotheP. 4. Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may ;J3e permitted to make a representatlon to decide her case in the 1 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 22006(1!$MPJR-CG96 3WP (S-) No.4130 of 2005 w ~'^. light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on her own expenses before entering into service. 5. Learned counse! appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 7. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. __- - - aown pras SA11- feantst iud6e ^