IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40130 of 2010 1.AMRENDRA SAH 2.Bhim Sah, both sons of Sangyan Sah @ Sagyan Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.11.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Sour Bazar (Patarghat O.P.) P.S.Case No.338 of 2009 for the offences punishable under sections 147, 149, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(X) SC/ST Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners, with reference to the first information report and the allegations set out thereunder, submits that though the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 30.7.2009, the first information report has been instituted after almost five months thereafter on 13.12.2009. He further submits that the allegations are omnibus as the injuries said to have been caused on the person of the informant and other persons, are simple in nature. He submits that the alleged occurrence is 2 an outcome of a civil dispute between the contesting parties. Taking into consideration the circumstances of the case and considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioners Amrendra Sah and (2) Bhim Sah be released on bail upon each of them furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Sour Bazar (Patarghat O.P.) P.S.Case No.338 of 2009 (G.R.No.2191 of 2009). ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)