1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 117 OF 2009 (Vrindavan Nagar Vikas Sanstha vs. Shalikram Krishnaji & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 23, 2009. Heard Shri Vaidya, learned counsel for the appellant – plaintiff. His suit for removal of encroachment on public utility land has been dismissed. The alleged encroacher i.e. Cooperative Housing Society as also Planning Authorities were parties before the Court. The lower appellate Court has found that no sanctioned lay out plan was produced on record by the plaintiff and during the arguments it has been accepted that there is no such sanctioned lay out plan. Similarly, the lower appellate Court has found that area of land, left open for being used for public utility, is also not brought on record. It is, therefore, obvious that the consideration by lower appellate Court cannot be labelled as erroneous. It has not been demonstrated to be perverse before this Court. No substantial question of law arises in 2 this matter. Second Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.