- 1 - 1.ss.43.2011 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 43 OF 2011 Rajabai G. Gadge ..Plaintiff -Versus- Radhika Jagannath Sadia ..Defendant .......... Mr.Ramesh Jain i/b Ramesh Jain and Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is based on a demand promissory note executed by the defendant. The defendant having failed and neglected to honour the same on presentation. The plaintiff by his advocates’ notice demanded payment. There was no reply to the same. There is no affidavit-in-reply. The defendant has not filed an appearance. The defendant is absent. 2 The plaintiff has filed a compilation of documents which is taken on record and marked ‘A’ collectively. The same contains a licence under the Bombay Money Lenders Act. - 2 - 1.ss.43.2011 3 There is nothing on record that militates against the averments and submissions made in the plaint. There is, therefore, no defence to the suit. 4 The suit is, therefore, decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be at the rate 12% per annum. Costs to be quantified as per Rules. Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules. -