IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2008 / 18TH ASHADHA 1930 W.P(C).No. 30788 of 2004(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MISS GAYATHRI M.S., STUDENT, J.M.H.S., SHASTHAMKOTTA REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN G.MURALEEDHARA BHATTATHIRI,MUTHEDATH MADOM, KOYIKAL BAGAM, PERUVILAKKARA P.O., WEST KALLADA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOLLAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA. 4. VASUDEVAN NAIR, ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C).No. 30788/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE MALAYALA MANORAMA NEWS PAPER DAILY DATED 6/12/2003. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2nd RESPONDENT DATED 9/01/2004. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1st RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 1st RESPONDENT DATED 12/08/2004. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE scm S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== W.P (C) .No.30788 of 2004 ================== Dated this the 9th day of July, 2008. J U D G M E N T Although writ petition was admitted on 19.10.2004, the petitioner has not paid process. Today when the writ petition came in the defect list there was no representation. The synopsis of the writ petition reads thus: “The petitioner was granted first place with 'A' Grade in six items and she was granted 60 points as the total score in Shasthamkotta Sub District School, Festival. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that due to the illegal manipulation of the 4th respondent another student who scored 42 points was granted the title of 'Kalathilakam'. The petitioner was also top scorer in Nirtham and Nirthetharam items (Mrithungam). The action of the 4th respondent is illegal and arbitrary. 3. The petitioner made a sudden complaint before the 3rd and 4th respondents and thereafter a detailed complaint before the 2nd respondent, because of their inaction, the petitioner also submitted detailed representation before the 1st respondent against the illegalities and improperties. Till now no action has been taken and they are supporting their officials. The next Youth Festival is going to begin and if no action is taken this illegality will continue. Hence this writ petition.” From the very synopsis, it is clear that at this point of time, the petitioner cannot be granted the reliefs, as prayed W.P (C) .No.30788 of 2004 - 2 - for, in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs