IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 184 of 2008(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: PETITIONER ---------------------- MOHAMMED RAFI, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. IBRAHIMKUTTY, BUSHRA MANZIL, ODANAVATTOM.P.O, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUDHEESH.A. SMT.C.V.BINDU SMT.M.V.SAVEENA RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 4. SREEDHARAN NAIR.N, KIZHAKKEKKARA HOUSE, MARUTHAMON PALLY, POOYAPPALLY, KOLLAM. 5. SAROJINI AMMA.N, W/O. SREEDHARAN NAIR.N, KIZHAKKEKKARA HOUSE, MARUTHAMON PALLY, POOYAPPALLY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJU K.MATHEWS FOR R4-5 GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.).No. 184 of 2008(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS:- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DRIVING LICENCE OF THE PETITIONER's EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE S.S.L.C BOOK OF SOUMYA NAIR S. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF INTENDED MARRIAGE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND SOUMYA NAIR S., DATED 05/05/2008 EXT.P4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR RECEIPT OF MONEY. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 01/06/2008. \\TRUE COPY// P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(Crl).No.184 of 2008-S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T P.R.RAMAN, J. Pursuant to the order passed on 11/06/2008, the parties have appeared before us. We have interacted with the petitioner's father and mother. According to them, since both petitioner and the alleged detenue, the girl Soumya Nair have determined to marry and they are in deep love, they have agreed to conduct the marriage between the petitioner and Soumya Nair. We again interacted with the girl as well as the parents of the girl. The girl states that she wants to go with the petitioner. Since the alleged detenue Soumya Nair has already attained majority, she is a free person and she can decide her future course of action. In case the alleged detenue goes along with the petitioner and his parents, necessarily, the petitioner's father having undertaken to celebrate their marriage, will do so. P.R.RAMAN, Judge T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge ms