IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 4766 of 2008. Decided on: 19.06.2010. Devi Ram and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1.No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is jointly represented by the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 14.06.2010, rendered in Chet Ram and another versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No. 5778 of 2008. As per Para-1 of the preliminary submissions of the reply filed by the respondents, the petitioner No. 4 has already been granted the relief from the due date. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed qua petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3(a) to 3(d) (L.Rs. of deceased petitioner No. 3, Jagdish Chand). Respondents are directed to consider the case of petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3 (a) to 3(d) (L.Rs. of deceased petitioner No. 3, Jagdish Chand) as per judgment of the learned Tribunal rendered in T.A. No. 253 of 1986 on 13.12.1995 within a period of four weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 19, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.