THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4742 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims right over a plot of 556 square yards in Survey No.68/1 of Chakalipalem, Bapatla Municipality on the basis of a sale deed, dated 04.04.2005. Complaining that the third respondent society is interfering with her possession, the petitioner submitted a representation, dated 12.02.2009 to respondents 1 and 2, the District Collector, Guntur District, and the Tahsildar, Bapatla, Guntur District, respectively, with a request to protect her possession. The petitioner states that no action has been taken on the application submitted by her. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The authorities of the Revenue Department hardly have any role to play in the matter of deciding civil disputes, much less, to protect the possession of private individuals, particularly at a time when they are not able to protect their own properties. In case the petitioner faces any threat from the third respondent, she has to file a suit in a civil Court for appropriate remedy. Though it is contended that the first respondent has power under Section 107 of Cr.P.C., that hardly can be treated as a substantive remedy for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out her remedies by filing a suit. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:06.03.2009 kdl