IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 34835 of 2011 (O&M) Paramjit Singh @ Pammi .. Petitioner versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, who is accused in FIR No. 231 dated 13.9.2009, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Division No. 5, Ludhiana. Earlier the petitioner had filed pre-arrest bail application before the learned court below, which was dismissed on 24.10.2009. However, subsequently on the basis of some enquiry conducted by the investigating agency, where according to the petitioner certain findings were recorded in favour of the petitioner and other accused and also the fact that the co- accused was granted pre-arrest bail on 7.3.2011, which was confirmed on 2.9.2011, the petitioner filed fresh bail application before the learned court below on 25.3.2011. The factum of filing of earlier bail application and dismissal thereof on 24.10.2009 was not mentioned in that application. The aforesaid application was withdrawn by the petitioner on 18.4.2011 stating that there are certain technical defects. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to argue that non mentioning of the factum of filing and dismissal of earlier bail application in the court below was not intentional rather it was a bonafide error. However, I do not find any substance in the contention raised. Once the fact of filing of the earlier application for bail and the dismissal thereof had not been mentioned in the application filed before the court below, there is no question of entertaining fresh bail application filed by the petitioner for pre- arrest bail. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 1.12.2011 ( Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge