IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2440 of 2010 Date of decision: 9.4.2010 Ishwar Singh and another .. Petitioners v. Sonia Rani and ohers .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S. K. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 28.10.2009, passed by the learned court below, whereby in a claim petition filed by respondent No. 1, being widow of Sunil Kumar, the petitioners (parents of Sushil Kumar) have been added as respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the application filed by respondent No. 1 to implead the petitioners as respondents in the claim petition pending before the Tribunal is a calculated effort to deprive them of compensation on account of death of their son. In fact, they should have been impleaded as claimants. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. The application was filed by the widow of the deceased to implead the petitioners, as respondents in the claim petition. The petitioners before this court had not filed any application before the Tribunal to transpose themselves as claimants in the claim petition. Even otherwise, they have their independent right to file claim petition to claim compensation on account of death of their son. No fault as such can be found with the order passed by the Tribunal impleading the petitioners as respondents in the claim petition filed by respondent No. 1. For the reasons mentioned above, the present petition is dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 9.4.2010 mk