COURT NO. 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) 267/2001 (Old No. 36448/1992) Smt. Bhagwati Kandpal, W/o Sri J.C. Kandpal, R/o N.H.P.C., Colony, Ban-Basa, District Nainital. …….Petitioner Versus 1. The Chairman & Managing Director, N.H.P.C., 98, Hem-Kunt Tower, Nehru Place, New Delhi. 2. The Chief Engineer, Tanakpur, N.E. Project Ban-Basa, District Nainital. ……Respondents Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned Counsel for the respondents. 10th December, 2007 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has raised a grievance relating to her promotion. The petition was filed in the year 1992. It has not been stated by this time by filing a fresh affidavit that the petitioner’s grievance has not been redressed so fare. If the petitioner’s grievance has not been redressed so far, the petitioner may make a representation to the Chairman & Managing Director (C.M.D.) and the C.M.D. is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and decide the same by a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of submission of certified copy of this order along with representation and the copy of the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (P.C. Verma, J.) Prabodh