IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3237 of 2010 Smt. Usha Kumari Versus State of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 3. 13.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the representation of the petitioner was considered and after consideration of the representation, appropriate order had been passed and communicated to the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order in question is not correct. Be that as it may, since the representation of the petitioner has been considered and order has been passed, the contempt application need not proceed further. The same stands disposed of. Notwithstanding the above, if any admissible amount on account of G.P.F. is payable, the same may be paid to the petitioner without delay. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)