(4^ l^ r ^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WMT PETITION f S) No. 1^)12010 PETITIONER ' ^\^.> ^^y' ^- ^y ^\>""..^ •S!«&y" RESPONDENTS RAJENDRA KUMAR SAHU S/o Late Shri. Puniram Sahu Aged about 5$ Years, Ex. Subedar from Army Service Core, Resident at: Street No. 2 Jawahar Nagar, AKALTARA District: Janjgir-Champa (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralay, D.K.S.Bhawan, RAIPUR 2 The Collector, Collectorate Office, Janjgir-Champa (CG) 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, AKALTARA District: Janjgir Champa (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND1A. 7S[ ^iqidq, y>Tl1-M<|(o, I^diy^ _.l^...K..&lr^.%&.<§^0.)^ ^?i^rr wfl^"'''""""""*""""""""""""^'""""^ 200 ^T^?T^ (ysgf^q^T) W^'^T^NT ^?i 3?I^?T 5b^J<^ Tumane iwiw^ft^T^n^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivdstava.J- petitic|ner petitior|er over|age 09-04-2010 Shri B. P. Rao, counsel forthe Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Heard. The limited grievance of the the petitioner aggrieved on account of his before the Collector, Janjgir-Champa, (Annexure P-15) allowed the petition candidature on the ground of he being was within the age limit prescribed. The C| the order ofthe Collector to considerthe ca| merit list in accordance with the rules representation to the Chief Executive However, when no action was taken, the Without commenting upon the decis| Executive Officer, order having been petitioner eligible, issuing directiqn to the on the part of the Chief Executive Officer tc( of the petitioner in accordance with law. Accordingly, it is directed that the shall consider and decide the case ofthe With the aforesaid observation, the ^ ftf the State/respondents No.1 & 2. <=<bl^?<l4hT ^H<rff ^* f^^l ^^K ^3tRR3?lt^T as ventilated in the petition is that lon-selection, had preferred a petition ^/ho vide order dated 13-03-2009 h|olding that rejection of petitioner's was not correct and the petitioner (lief Executive Officer was directed by t)didature of the petitioner and prepare Thereafter, petitioner preferred a Offi|=er on 02-05-2009 (Annexure P-16). peptioner has approached this Court. |on which has to be taken by the Chief by the Cotlector hotding the Cphief Executive Officer, it is obligatory teke appropriate decision in the case re^pondent No.S-Chief Executive Officer p^titioner without undue delay. l^etition stands disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^V^W ^-^ar^TT^^, <f^1 <pTP? -- IS 1 P- -^.•2010 —1,00,000.