1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ABITRATION APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2010 M/sHindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ..Appellant Vs. Vasant Pure Fuels ... Respondent. ..... Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande, for the Appellant. Mr. A. Joshi i/b Mr. Nitin Mulye, for the Respondent. ..... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 30 th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1] By the Order dated 18.8.2009 passed by the District Judge-3, Pune, the Appellants/Opponents are restrained from stopping the supply of the petroleum product to the Respondent and has observed that this Order would remain till the main Petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is disposed of. 2] Shri Deshpande appearing on behalf of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation submits that such an Order could not have been made by the Lower Court, in as much as there are several irregularities and when the supply was stopped for good reasons. It was discovered that there was 2 defect in the quality of the product and there were test reports to prove this fact. 3] It is not necessary to go into the rival contentions in as much as the appeal is directed against an ad-interim order made on 18.8.2009 and I propose to direct the Lower Court to dispose of the main application within the specified period. In my view the following Order would meet the ends of justice. 4] The Misc. Application No.460 of 2009 pending on the file of the District Judge Pune shall be disposed of on or before 15th June, 2010. Parties to co-operate in disposal of this application before the specified date. All contentions of both sides are kept open. The Court below to dispose of the Application without being influenced by any observations in the ad-interim Order. Appeal is disposed off in these terms. No costs. 5] The Civil Application does not survive in the light of the disposal of the Appeal. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)