IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2326 of 2008 1. VIJAY KANT BHAGAT SON OF LATE THAKKO RAM BHAGAT 2. PRAVIN KUMAR BHAGAT SON OF LATE HARIKANT BHAGAT BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GATHULLI, P.S. KEOTI, DISTT- DARBHANGA. .. PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR DARBHANGA. 3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, DARBHANGA. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL ENGINEERING ORGANISATION, DARBHANGA. 5. THE S.D.O. SADAR, DARBHANGA. 6. THE C.O. KEOTI, DISTT- DARBHANGA. 7. SRI KESHAV CHANDRA CHAUDHARY, CONTRACTOR, R/O VILLAGE- CHAHUTA, P.S. KAMTAUL, DISTT- DARBHANGA PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MOHALLA- BANGALI TOLA, P.S LAHERIASARAI, DISTT- DARBHANGA. .. RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner: M/s. Vijay Kumar Bhagat and Amlesh Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 16 ----------- 5. 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner claims to be the raiyat of 40 decimals of land in Plot No. 2758/1 of village Gathulli in Keoti Block of Darbhanga District. Such statement is made on the basis of the Revisional Survey Khatiyan, Annexure-1. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that notwithstanding the entries in the Revisional Survey Khatiyan, authorities of the State are laying PCC road over the same violating the orders of this Court dated 29.7.2008. 3. In the counter affidavit, State-Respondents have submitted that bricks soling road was laid on the portion of the land 7-8 years earlier, for the present PCC road is being laid for 2 which earth work has since been completed materials have been brought on the site for laying the PCC road under the Chief Ministers Village Road Scheme. The fact that the lands have been recorded in the revisional survey operation in the name of the petitioner is not being disputed by the state- Respondents as there is no dispute about the genuineness of the revisional survey entry made in favour of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question. 4. Having heard counsel for the parties, I direct the authorities not to lay PCC road over the lands in question, petitioner shall also maintain status quo over the lands in question. State-Respondents are at liberty to take steps for correction of the Revisional Survey Entry. PCC road which has been laid on the lands in question after the interim order was passed by this Court on 29.7.2008 be also removed. 5. Application stands disposed of. Ibrar/- ( V.N.Sinha, J.)