IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1194 of 2009 VINAY PRAKASH, Son of Vijay Prakash Gupta, resident of Mohalla- Mahavir Lane, Kannu Lal Road, Mithapur, P.O. G.P.O. Patnqa, P.S. Jakkanpur, District- Patna......Petitioner. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Director General of Income Tax (System) New Delhi. 2. Under Secretary (C-1) Staff Selection Commission Block No.12, C.G.O. Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 3. Under Secretary (C-II) , Staff Selection Commission, Block No. 12, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 4. Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes Jeewan Deep Building Parliament Street, New Delhi. 5 The Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Cetral Region (C.R.), Personal training Department, Allahabad. 6. The Incharge Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission(C.R.), Personal & Training Department, Allahabad 7. The Assistant Director (NOM), Staff Selection Commission Central Region, Allahabad. 8. The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna..........Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner :- Mr. Rajendra Kr.Jain,Advocate Counsel for the Revenue Department :- Mr. Harshwardhana Prasad, Sr.Standing Counsel --------- 2 27-01-2009 The stamp reporter has raised an objection that petitioner has moved this court through writ petition directly without moving the Central Administrative Tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that in view of Appendix -6, which contains Staff Selection Commission at serial no. 50, the Central Administrative Tribunal Rules of practice,1993 permit filing of application by the petitioner to claim the relief in question. Since an effective alternative remedy is provided by the - 2 - Naresh Statute the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty that , if so advised, petitioner may pursue his remedy before a competent Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal in accordance with law. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J)