IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15762 of 2005 GANAURI PRASAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner had earlier come before this court against the recovery affected by the respondents and for payment of the retiral benefits through C.W.J.C. No. 8349 of 2001 and which was allowed by order dated 24.9.2001 quashing the order of recovery and with a further direction to the authorities to re-determine the retiral benefits of the petitioner on the basis of last salary drawn and make payment of the arrears thereof within a period of three months from the date of production/communication of the order. Thus in so far as the major relief of the petitioner is concerned, nothing survives for consideration by this Court. Learned counsel, however, raises dispute regarding the provident fund amount. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna and in which it is stated that initially 2 an amount of Rs. 1,71, 210/- was paid to the petitioner vide memo dated 30.3.2000 (Annexure-B) and a further amount of Rs. 13,654/- was again paid to him with up to date interest on 15.2.2007. It is thus submitted that there is no amount due in relation to the G.P.F. claim of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the statement made in the writ petition submits that according to the calculation of the petitioner he is entitled to a further sum of Rs. 72,321/-. Having regard to the circumstances aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, if so aggrieved, to file a representation together with the calculative details in support of his claim and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law by respondent No.5, the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)