IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15608 of 2010 SHEO RAM PANDEY @ SHRORAM PANDEY, S/o Brij Bhushan Pandey. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that a dacoity was committed in the house of the informant and the son and munshi of the informant were kidnapped. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but subsequently his complicity arose in the confessional statement of the co-accused. Moreover after the kidnapping certain calls were made by one Amrit Mistri the munshi of the informant from a certain mobile phone which was traced to be in the name of the present petitioner. When the mobile was recovered the petitioner’s voter card was found to be affixed on the same. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it in view of the serious nature of the offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)