IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 9TH JANUARY 2009 / 19TH POUSHA 1930 AS.No. 26 of 1997 ------------------- I.A.175/95 in I.A.6426/94 in O.S.1152/94 OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR APPELLANT(S): -------------- 1. RAPPAI, S/O DEVASSY, MANJALLY HOUSE, NELLIKKUNNU DESOM, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR. 2. PAULSON, S/O RAPPAI, MENACHERY HOUSE, NELLIKUNNU DESOM, OLLUKKARRA VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. JINO & COMPANY, REP. BY PARTNER, K.P.DENNY, S/O KACHAPPILLY PAVU, RICE BAZAR, THRISSUR TOWN. 2. SUNNY, S/O KANJIRATHINKAL JOSE, NADATHARA VILLAGE AND DESOM, THRISSUR. 3. SHEELA, W/O SUNNY, NATHARA VILLAGE DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AS.No. 26 of 1997 ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.193/1997 DISMISSED 9.1.2009 SD/- V.GIRI, JUDGE (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE V.GIRI, J ------------------- A.S.26/1997 -------------------- Dated this the 9th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Mr.Jijo Paul, learned counsel for the first respondent/plaintiff submits that the entire amount due to the plaintiff has been received during the pendency of the appeal before this Court. Appeal itself has been preferred against an order passed by the trial Court in relation to an order of attachment passed during the pendency of the appeal. In circumstances where the original transaction itself seems to have been settled between the parties, no further issue survives in this appeal. Accordingly, the order passed in I.A.175/1995 shall stand set aside. Subject to the above, Appeal is disposed of. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs