IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 88 Of 2007 Mohd. Ikram ………….. Revisionist Versus Judge Family Court, Nainital and another ………….Respondents Mr. S.K.Mandal, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the respondent no.1 Dated: December 14th , 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Heard Sri S.K.Mandal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the respondent no.1. Mr. S.K.Mandal, learned counsel for the revisionist stated that revisionist has divorced the respondent no.2 as per the custom privilege usage in Mohammedan Law. Mr. Mandal further stated that after the divorce respondent no.2 has remarried. Mr. Mandal fairly stated that in view of the second marriage now petitioner would move an application under Section 127 of Cr.P.C. before the competent court. In view of the statement made hereinabove present revision is dismissed, however revisionist shall be at liberty to move proper application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. before the competent court under the change circumstances. Stay vacation application no. 572/2007 stands disposed of. (Alok Singh, J.) 14.12.2009 Nishant