IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31889 of 2006(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MR.C.K. ANTONY, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O. LATE KUNJUVAREED, T.C.22/1239, CHULLISSERY HOUSE, KUTTANELLUR P.O., TRICHUR-682 014. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JOYI. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RDO), THRISSUR. 3. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION, THRISSUR. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, SHAKTI NAGAR, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 5. MR. PAULSON, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. JOHNY, RESIDING AT VADAKKAN HOUSE, T.C.22/1238, KUTTANELLUR P.O.,THRISSUR-682 014. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW, R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, ADV. SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL, R4 BY ADV. SRI. M.K. CHANDRA MOHANDAS, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.31889/2006-U: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: PHOTO SEPARATING THE HOUSE OF THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT. EXT.P.2: PHOTO SHOWING THE LEAKING OF GAS AND THICK SMOKE TO PETITIONERS HOUSE. EXT.P.3: PHOTO SHOWING THE CHIMNEY OF FACTORY. EXT.P.4: PHOTO SHOWING INNER SIDE OF FACTORY. EXT.P.5: OFFICE COPY OF REPRESENTATION TO R.3. EXT.P.6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY R.3. EXT.P.7: OFFICE COPY OF REPRESENTATION TO R.4. EXT.P.8: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY R.4. EXT.P.9: INTIMATION OF REFERENCE FROM R3 TO R4. NO.K.DIS/7002/2006/A2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.31889 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner approached this court with certain grievances regarding the alleged pollution caused by the industrial unit run by the 5th respondent. In view of the intervening developments in case the petitioner has still any grievance left with regard to the pollution, he may approach the 4th respondent in which case appropriate prompt action shall be taken by the said respondent with notice also to the affected parties. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31889 of 2006 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 29th October, 2008