Civil Revision No. 5540 of 2007 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5540 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.08.2010 Suman Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Bharat Mittar (dead) through LRs ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: - Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate, and Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL) The respondent-landlord filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for eviction of the petitioner on the ground of non-payment of rent. The learned Rent Controller assessed the provisions rent and fixed the date for payment. The petitioner-tenant did not make the payment on the date fixed consequently, the learned Rent Controller ordered the eviction of the petitioner from the premises in dispute on the ground of non-payment of rent. The appeal also failed. The learned counsel for the petitioner challenged the order passed by the learned Rent Controller and the learned appellate authority. The revision was adjourned sine die to await the decision in Civil Revision No.3577 of 2006 titled “Rajan alias Raj Kumar Vs. Civil Revision No. 5540 of 2007 (O&M) -2- Rakesh Kumar”. The Revision Petition No.3577 of 2006 has been decided by this Court on 7.1.2010, where the view, that the tenant is liable to immediate eviction on non-payment of rent, has been upheld. In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, there is no merit in this revision petition, which is ordered to be dismissed, but with no order as to costs. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge August 24, 2010 R.S.