( 1 ) cria4732.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4732 OF 2011 Gujjar Khan alias Anwar Khan s/o. .. Applicant Mirza Khan Pathan Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms. T.W. Pathan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 17.11.2011 P.C. :- 1. The applicant apprehends arrest in Crime No. 199 of 2011 of Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Beed, under sections 395, 307, 384, 323, 427 of I.P.C. etc. and provisions of Bombay Police Act. Perused papers. The F.I.R. clearly mentions name of the applicant as leader of five persons who approached the complainant, who filed the F.I.R., by name, Mr. Shaikh Nisar Shaikh Jafar. In the night of 26th September, 2011, according to the complainant, moneys were demanded and when they were not paid, iron rod was inflicted and his car was damaged and mobile was stolen. Medical ( 2 ) cria4732.11 certificate is produced. It was argued by learned advocate for the applicant that co-accused have been released bail. So, the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail. 2. Having considered the police papers as well as facts of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, as the allegations against the applicant are of serious nature. The applicant managed to catch-hold of the victim and all alone subjected to loss of mobile as well as damage to his car. He was in company of four persons. The argument that the co-accused have been released on bail, does not appeal to me as they must have been released on bail after their arrest. Hence, following orders. 3. The application for anticipatory bail is rejected. [R.Y. GANOO, J.] snk/2011/NOV11/cria4732.11