IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2432 of 2011 CHHOTE NARAYAN SINGH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 29.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Annexure-1 is the set of charges drawn up against the petitioner. Even an FIR has been instituted in relation to the same issue but that is another aspect of the matter. Petitioner has been suspended and he has been asked to show cause. He is aggrieved by such an action taken by the District Superintendent of Education, Nawada because he is here before this Court seeking quashing of annexure-1. There is no cogent or legal submission which has been made on behalf of the petitioner to interfere with annexure-1 at this stage. There is neither any jurisdictional issue nor any violation of rules which have been pointed out by the petitioner. If the petitioner is a civil servant holding responsible post and if certain omission or commission has emerged in performance of such responsibility he has duty to explain the cause to his superior. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the petitioner has already offered his explanation but no final decision has been taken till date. Let the concerned authority take cognizance of the explanation offered by the petitioner. If it is found satisfactory, the matter will come to rest and if not the law and the rule will be enforced against the petitioner by holding an enquiry on the set of - 2 - charges which has already been served on the petitioner. An early resolution to the allegation will help the administration in either absolving the petitioner of the allegation made against him or get rid of such people who are otherwise a burden on the system, whichever the case may be. This writ application is dismissed with the above direction/observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)