IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37711 of 2008 1) Subodh Kumar, son of Sobhan Saw, 2) Sobhan Saw, son of Late Laldhari Saw, 3) Sushila Devi, wife of Sobhan saw, village Gopalpur, PS Chandi, Dist. Bhojpur – Petitioners Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Rekha Devi, daughter of Laxuman Mistri, Mohalla Karman Tola, PS Ara Nawada, Dist. Bhojpur – Opp. Parties. 2 19.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by order, dated 5.10.2007 passed in Complaint Case No. 1159C/2006 / 2018 Tr/2008 by the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Arrah by which cognizance for the offences under section 498A of the Penal Code and sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a compromise petition has been filed in the court below and as such this case ought to be quashed. However, it is also admitted that after the filing of the compromise petition, the complainant is not appearing to pursue the matter in view of the fact that in the maintenance case she has been given certain amount as maintenance. The court below may consider the compromise petition if the complainant appears and supports it for the purpose of dropping the entire proceeding. However, in the present circumstances this court finds no illegality in the impugned order so as to warrant interference by this court. 2 This application is dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)