30.7.2004 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, coun aél for the pe h'ongr. State by Shri Rajkumar Gupta, P.L. on advance copy. Ecard. Learned counsel for the pe1itioner—Union submits that the ‘ v matter relates to regularization vf daily wage employees. He further submits that for the pres the petitierlex‘s may be given an opportunity of tiling the ti representation afresh before the competent authofity of the respondents, which Shall be considered on its oWn merits in ac ondance With law. The. petition is on behalf of Union and individuals arc not there. The names are given in 1'3 ‘agraph 5.3 of the petition in Tabular fom,.which shows diti‘ere t datee of appointment. 'Having coneidered and Wi tout expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the pinion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direct n is given to the petitioners individually to make a detailed epresentation afresh raising the grievances before the C mpetent authority of the respondente along with a copy f the‘petition and thiS order, within 4 weeks, and on such resentation being filed, the competent authority of the resp ndents shall decide thesame on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible preferably Within twelve weeks i‘om the date of receipt of the repreeentation; .It is made ol that. if any grievance still remains, the petitioners may a the remedy available under the law. With the aforesaid obs disposed of. ations, this petition stands Sdl— Fakhruddin Judge RMI" :t [vie W " t e e r p v ‘ e