3N •EHB HIQH eWaS Of 3W>l!EhWSS AT BSASE0K (G.G.) wteT pE'EiTiaa NO, SS7 @p 2002 1. M /^/ .<t. ^ ^ ^/f/ <^^ BB'EWBEt) BF. ftsh©kShaBna S/@ XAte Shri Barmesbwar I<al Sbama* aged about 46 years, wrklag aa Ayurved Madieal ©efiee2',QevearomentAyunred Hasgital 'Tangaon • a?. Sanil Hanar S^lhani S/o S*K.@Olhani,aged atoou-b 4@ years, wrklng as Ayurvea Medieal Offiser, GOveraaeiat Ayueved Haspilsai Kachhe, Bistrlcs'fe KaalteF. laii. Sapna Parbe la^®airi. S.s.Parte, aged about 26 years, W&rklng as Ayurved Medieal QEfleeF, savemmen'bAyiarvedHespI.tal Kewati District Kanker. Rti. ctoanperiiwaFi Ehrave a^i B.Ii.tbEBve, aged aba.it 28 years, wrking as AytirveS Meaical QEficeF, GoveEianent AyuEved H®spitala»aisa Kanhar, Bistrict Kanker. •^ Baehha Bam Nalk aged abaut 32 years S/e airl R»P*aaRwani,aged 32 years, worktog a3 Ayurved Medieal OffieeB , GaveBnment Ayurved Hespital Ko^apaMta Bistriefc Kaakar. BBTIlIQNERS A N B le State ef caihatUsgarti. ghrough the Seeretary Bepartenaat eC Publie Health and Family welfare , B.K.s* Bulldlng.Baipur. Kanker» Bistxkei; Kankap. Bie superia-tenaent eum ©IstrietAyurved©fficer Kankes, Distrie-fe Kanker. •Bie ©tffeeter,Sttdian Systaip of Medielne aad H^meopatby ehhattisgarii. Raipur. SEspoaB&ms t s 02 : ( WRXS PETITION UNSER ARTICLES 227/227 W? eafS15EIWEI<M ©? INDIA XtSC-22 :.d^i^|Btei-3«,«w|»'is,^RSu<13<-, .^^^: <WR®%N<?6 ^ws- 31J^[?iT !<-ij<* aaii 3^Hi<S ^Hl^'a diW^-wWg^ 07.03.2002 MedM- Shri Pnishont Mi^hju, learr^ |ietitioners and ShnSanjay^ K. Ag^dwdl, leaFned Diepurty Advpcate Seneral for ttie respondehts / State. Petitiqn is disposed of on merit^. The pe+ittoners iho^ in "this p^tion sought forj^ iliefs:- 1, That, this Hon'ble Court' cbN?^ilTl •4-li4k^'^ ^^3 ^>t+t{.ii'i %' -Slt^? ^E9T. '' may^kindly be pleoe^d tb direct the raq»ohdents io pro^uce the rele'iftiiTf- r-ecord whidi has resulfied in^passing;4f ths impu^ned prller Annexuce P-3 •fdrkiridperusal oftl'^sl-fon'bleCourf; 2. That, this Hbn'ble'CouFtjm^ kihdly bepleaAicl to Jssuea writ in rte rwture oT c^rtiororj qua^ impugned order No.Esttia/2a52/17^-82, Kanker dorted 07^)2;2002 (Anhe^re^l)^passedby|tliet«sponderitNo^inthefx)rm of wirelessmessage; XI-HC-22 3^i3lS!<"l*S3w!r6@Sfi:13<'£ sii^^Is S^iith^^t sti*ijcti tilia mSo.Sss <il*WII %<iMl 2092^ 3. That,-thisH6n'bleCourt' <*Nfa^i'rl ^i^<'ff^ is<<3 ^'tSK '^3I^nTi?RR^r fi^luhdlyBepleal^tojsaiea writ in ^e^riatui^ of c|^oi^i qua^ order No.l886-9t ddt^? 06^2.2002 (Annexu^^^ passed iby the I'esporicle^t N6.2 in the forjtn of wireless message; 4. Tho^, 1+iis Hon'bte Coyrl'liKiy kihd)y be plec^^ td issue a writ in the ridture of'c^rtioniri qua^iihg^the impugried order No.48I/2002/Chil.4, Raipur (Annexure^P-3) dated 05^)2.2002 passedby t^e raqppndent NoA and further circulated ?by -the No.l/Estha/2002/941-36 petitioherstogetherwith Admittedly, Itie petitfoners flj«-ho|ding the cjvil poste c^ jience, in view of theLjudamenf in -th^ case of L. Chanclra Kumar Vs; pni6n^&dw^!^o^eFS,'l'eport^^ht(l9S^^Supt^ '•respondent ^ No.4 vide IRaipurdated 06.02.2002and S^ Any^o'tB^'^luef, which rjhis HonllejCqyirtjmay deem fit 'l;'^'^^;;:'''..,-ff,:^-^;-.';^.<:t.:.';:..'^^^^^^ cttd propey, moy also be passed in favpur ,of the cdst of the petitKXn. ^l^ ^i-ia^ XI-HC-22 ..3S?^<il9<l,?S'[I!'wiS>a* 'itSt<! Wt^ W-TOiTWfllW tiilS^I W f^y^^i^ SbW^^'H^ Subbu/Soma /].-I,1'- 'fWSsVfSw^s : -3 - 261, -fhie 'peti-lioners hewe to apj^oach^"fhe State; Actntinistratwe Tribynal^irilhispeti'tipnisnofmonri^mA Accorxlingly^ Ihis p^tion is jdisposed of wi^ {aetitiQnei^^to a^^ approprKrterelief,? • L.aimed :"coilmsel for the ftetitioners submi'tted ^ttiat •the Tnbundl may be;clir®cteid^^^^^^^^ ^P^f^N''IB3^^Ts^ ^i^^ %3?^P?3H^ ^P?3H^ order, if any, fileclA^th&petitioner^ ^ The Tribunaluis dii'ected ^^ w ^plicB^tm^is-fileclaond :pc^.appj^ orders as exi^tditiously ds poisabk. •-:: .'';,.F.: ''':. '•<':'. - Pm'i^wpes^^^ttjff^ts^yf^^cc^^l^ asWpiKJitiouslyaspossible. :;^Sd/- ChiefJustice "t'fli^^