1 caw947.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.947 OF 2011 In WRIT PETITION NO.1112 OF 2010 CIDCO Education & Welfare Sanstha Nashik : Applicant (Orig.Resp. no.4) V/s. Tileshwar Shaikshanik Vikas Mandal & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.S.G.Kudle for the applicant. Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for respondent no.1. Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for respondent no.2. Mr.J.Shekhar i/b. J. Shekar & Co., for respondent no.4. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for respondent no.5. Mr.A.H.Palekar, `A’ panel counsel for respondent no.6. ... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : MAY 03, 2011. P.C.: The first two reliefs claimed by the applicant, if accepted, would result in rendering the reliefs claimed in the Writ Petition infructuous. The Writ Petition has already been admitted, after hearing both the sides and the Court directed the parties to maintain status quo as on the date of 2 caw947.11 the order dated 10.2.2010 which is still operating. In the circumstances, the first two reliefs cannot be granted. 2. Realising this position, the counsel for the applicant submits that in that case, the Court may, at least, fix the Writ Petition by giving a peremptory date for hearing. Since Writ Petition No.1112 of 2010 will have to be heard along with PIL No.33 of 2010, request for early hearing should necessarily be pursued in PIL No.33 of 2010. It will be open to the applicant to move the concerned Court for expediting the said PIL No. 30 of 2010. 3. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)