THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9008 of 2010 Dated:21.04.2010 Between: P.Subbaiah, S/o.Kesavaiah ...Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the District Collector, Kadapa District And others ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9008 of 2010 ORDER: There is a dispute between the petitioner on one hand and the fifth respondent on the other hand with regard to the land admeasuring Acs.4.94 cents in survey No.63/2 of G.Narasimhapuram Village. The long dispute was ultimately resolved by the second respondent in proceedings D.Dis.(E3)/3818/2007, dated 06.01.2009. It is an order under Board Standing Order 15(18)(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders, which is to the following effect. In view of the above conclusion, I hereby order that the assignments made to the Revision Petitioner vide DKT No.52/1394 dt.26.7.1984 and DKT No.15/1414 dt.20.07.2004 and assignment made to the Respondent vide DKT No.96/95 dated 11.7.1986 are cancelled. The Tahsildar, B.Mattam is requested to take action for assignment of the land to both parties equally @ 2.47 acres each to meet both of justice. The Revision Petition is accordingly allowed partly and disposed. In this writ petition the petitioner seeks implementation of the order by the fourth respondent. As the relief prayed is very limited, this Court need not elaborately refer to the background of the case. This writ petition is virtually filed as an execution petition. The jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or a writ petition is not meant as a forum to execute the orders of higher revenue authorities directing the lower revenue authorities. It is always for the petitioner to lodge a complaint to the Joint Collector about the non-implementation of the orders. The Writ Petition is misconceived, and is accordingly dismissed. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 21.04.2010 vs