HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (ClNo.2192/2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENT Girishankar Srivas, Age 36 years, S/o Shyamlal, Rajatalab, Raipur Versus Regional Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Raja Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (05.05.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard finally with the consent ofthe parties. Petitioner — Girishankar Srivas has filed this petition for issuance of necessary direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur to consider and decide his application for grant of permit on Bilaspur route. According to the petitioner, the application for grant of permit has been filed on 06.04.2009 and no decision has been taken till date. Mr. Arun Sao, learned Government Advocate for the respondent submits that if the application has been filed by the petitioner for grant of permit and the same has not been disposed of till date, the Regional Transport Authority shall dispose of the same at the earliest in accordance with law. In view of the above submissions made by learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if the concerned Regional Transport Authority has not decided theapplication dated 06.04.2009 filed by the petitioner fpr grant of permit for the above route till date, the seft- E^f<^K t^i s& l^ • E^^ • !S B ?f?^. B ,<'>-"--^. %£<S§?. xsesx WRIT PETITION (C) No.2192/2010 ^ shyna same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the said authority. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. —--— SdA , Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge