.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1584 OF 2008 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatna. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and 3 others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.K.P. Anilkumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Lata Desai, Advocate i/b. Pallavi Divekar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.S.P. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. Ms.Smita Gaidhani, A.G.P., for respondent No.1. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent - Board has drawn our attention to the affidavit-in-reply filed by the Secretary of the Security Guards Board i.e. respondent No.2. We do not find any conflict of interest in the matter, as the Secretary of the Security Guards Board has spelt .{2}. out that deficiencies which are required to be completed by the members of the petitioner and if all those formalities are complied with, it is specifically stated that they would examine the matter and consider the applications of security guards for registration. 2. The learned Counsel for respondent No.3 employers states that in case the security guards Board registers security guards, his establishment would accept them for employment. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the only apprehension of the petitioner is the delay in considering the application of its members for registration. This apprehension can be looked into by directing the respondent No.2 Board to process the applications, if all the deficiencies are removed within six weeks, and notify the list, subject to approval of the State Government as per the directions issued by the State Government on 16.11.2007 within four weeks. The State Government should dispose of the matter within two weeks from receipt of the representation from the security .{3}. Board. The learned Counsel for the petitioners undertakes that the petitioner Sanghatana would make up for the deficiencies, if any, within two weeks from the date the same are pointed out by the Board. 4. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]