THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.2848 OF 2008 DATED:25.8.2011 Between: P. Narayana Rao … Petitioner And The Secretary Gram Panchayat Secretariat Village Devanpally Mandal Kamareddy District Nizamabad and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.2848 OF 2008 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the notice dt.18-1-2008 issued by the first respondent – Secretary of the Devanpally Gram Panchayat, to stop construction of a compound wall undertaken by the petitioner around the function hall. It is the case of the petitioner that the Gram Panchayat, Devanpally, granted construction permission and approved the plan in proceedings in File No.GPCP No.35/2006, dated 18-4-2006 for construction of G.I.sheeted shed in his land admeasuring 1865.04 sq. yards situated at Devanpally Village, Kamareddy Mandal, Nizamabad District, and as per the construction permission, the petitioner has to complete the construction within a period of twenty four months. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he is making the construction as per the sanctioned plan. The impugned notice is issued on an objection of a neighbour without assigning any reason. At the stage of admission, this Court has suspended the impugned notice by order dt.14.2.2008 and the said order is continued all along. Though the writ petition is of 2008, no counter affidavit is filed either on behalf of the Gram Panchayat or the second respondent – District Panchayat Officer. A perusal of the impugned notice shows that there is no allegation of any unauthorized construction or deviation from the approved plan by the petitioner, in the absence of which, merely because a neighbour has objected to the construction, notice could not have been issued by the first respondent to stop the construction. As the construction undertaken by the petitioner is covered by the sanctioned permit and approved plan and as no deviation of the same is complained, the impugned notice is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned notice dt.18-1-2008 issued by the first respondent is quashed. No costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 25.8.2011 bnr