WP(C) 4447/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. SN Sarma, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. LP Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Guwahati University. This writ petition has been filed challenging the re-evaluation of the answer sc ript of subject, namely, Issues and problems of Secondary Education in B.Ed. Exa mination of 2009 conducted by the Guwahati University. Learned counsel for the p etitioner has submitted that while re-evaluating the answer script of the petiti oner on the above subject, the marks awarded by the examiner before re-evaluatio n was not ’masked’ as regards answer to question No.1. Accordingly, learned coun sel for the petitioner has prayed for re-evaluation of the marks of the answer s cript in respect of question No.1. In view of the prayer made by the petitioner, after hearing the learned counsel for both the side, in the facts and circumstances stated above, this Court is of the view that it would meet ends of justice, if this writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a simple direction to the respondent authority to re-evalu ate the marks obtained by the petitioner in respect of Question No.1, without be ing influenced by the marks awarded by earlier examiner and do the needful in a ccordance with the law. Ordered accordingly. However, the process of re-evaluation as aforesaid shall be completed by the res pondent authority within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of th e certified copy of this order and thereafter do the needful in accordance with rules regulating the issue in question. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed o f.