1 LPA 321 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.321 OF 2010 IN Writ Petition No.9966 OF 2010 With C.A. No.17447 Of 2010 In L.P.A. No.321 Of 2010 Vishal s/o Jalindhar Kamble. ... Appellant. Versus The Chief General Manager, Technical Establishment Section, Prakashgad, 4th Floor, Station Road, Bandra (East) Mumbai And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. S.G. Jadhavar, Advocate for appellant. Shri. S.M. Godsay, Advocate, for respondents. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE: 13th DECEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The appellant challenges the order dated 30-11-2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ 2 LPA 321 OF 2010 Petition No.9966 of 2010 filed by the respondents. The writ petition was admitted and ad-interim relief granted earlier was confirmed till disposal of the writ petition. 3) The appellant is a Junior Engineer working with respondents. His grievance is that, after joining the last transfer place he was transferred after 13 months which is a midterm transfer against the guidelines framed by the respondents. The appellant approached the Industrial Court. The Industrial Court had passed order of interim relief on 16th September 2010. The respondents challenged the said order in Writ Petition No.9966 of 2010. 4) The learned counsel Shri. Godsay appearing for the respondents submits that earlier transfer of the appellant under orders dated 16-7-2009 was on his request. In the interest of administration the appellant was transfered along with other employees. The complaint filed by the appellant before the Industrial Curt is not maintainable as the appellant is not a workman, according to the counsel. 3 LPA 321 OF 2010 5) We have perused the impugned orders and other relevant documents placed on record. Learned counsel Shri. Godsay submits that the appellant is already relieved. This fact is disputed by the counsel for the appellant. 6) The appellant was transferred on administrative ground. The counsel submits that the guidelines which are placed on record are yet to be finalised. The appellant's earlier transfer order was passed on his request. the complaint filed by the appellant is pending before the Industrial Court. We expedite hearing of the complaint. We do not find any error in the impugned orders. 7) The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. 8) Civil Application No.17447 of 2010 is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl