IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2008 / 1ST MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 25334 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.V.RAMESAN, S/O.GOVINDAN,POYAKKARA VEEDU, CHEMMARASSERIPPARA, P.O. AZHIKODE,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE SECRETARY, AZHIKODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O. AZHIKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH SRI.P.V.DIPU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO..25334/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 9.2.2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 20.2.2004. EXT.P3: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 8.3.2004 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE PANCHAYAT DEPUTY DIRECTOR BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 8.6.2004 ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYT DEPUTY DIRECTOR TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE PANCHAYAT DEPUTY DIRECTOR DATED 19.7.2004 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE PPLICATION DATED 1.7.2004 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER SUBMITED BEFORE THE AZHEEKODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH BOARD. EXT.P7: COPY OF NOTICE DATED 15.9.2004 ISSUED BY PANCHAYAT PRESIDENT TO PETITIONER AND P.V. SUGATHA FOR A MEDIATION TALK ON 17.9.204 EXT.P8: COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEDIATION TALK DATED 17.9.2004 EXT.P9: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYATH PRESIDENT DATED 16.11.2004 TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P10: COPY OF LAWYER NOTICE DATED 16.3.2005 ISSUED BY PETITIONER THROUGH ADVOCATE PRASAD M.K. TO THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P11: COPY OF ORDER DATED 12.1.2006 OF THE HON'BLE OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION, THRIUVANANTHAPURAM. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.25334 of 2007 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of January , 2008 JUDGMENT Obviously, the affected parties are not before this court. The Panchayat alone has been arrayed as party. Exts.P2 and P5 which are passed against the affected parties are produced. The petitioner is directed either to approach the Civil Court or to file a fresh Writ Petition arraying the affected parties also as parties. This Writ Petition is closed. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk