IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22008 of 2009 BRAHMDEO PASWAN, son of Jilabi Paswan, R/O-Takuma, P.S. Pratapganj, District Supaul ---Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 3.8.2009 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown. However, the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Laltu Yadav and the alleged looted articles were recovered from the possession of aforesaid Laltu Yadav. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor any incriminating material has come during investigation save and except the confessional statement of the aforesaid co-accused. The learned APP is not in a position to refute the above submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial 2 Magistrate, Birpur, Supaul, in connection with Pratapganj P.S. Case No.08/09. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)