1 caf2849-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2849 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2429 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Ms. Dipti Pawar i/b. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for the applicants. Ms. Tanu Khatri h/f. Mr. Sandesh Patil for respondent No.3. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : JULY 22, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants who are claimants in a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. The claim petition was partly allowed. Applicants have preferred an Appeal for enhancement which is pending in this Court for final hearing. 2. Even according to the case of the 2 caf2849-11 applicants there is no stay granted by this Court in the Appeal. Therefore, the prayer made in this application will have to be made before the Tribunal and it is for the Tribunal to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, notwithstanding the pendency of the Appeal. 3. Subject to what is observed above, Civil Application is rejected by granting liberty to the applicants to make appropriate application before the Tribunal. (A.S.OKA, J.)