- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.W.P.NO.761 OF 2006 M/s.Soni Video Game ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr.A.M.Saraogi Advocate for Petitioner Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal A.P.P. for State .... WITH CRI.W.P.NO. 762 OF 2006 M/s.Sai Video Game ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr.A.M.Saraogi Advocate for Petitioner Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar A.P.P. for State .... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 27,2006 DATE : APRIL 27,2006 DATE : APRIL 27,2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State in both the matters. - 2 - 2. Petitioners want a direction to the Commissioner of Police to decide the applications filed by the petitioners for licence for Video Game Parlour. If the petitioners have filed applications and complied with all the directions, those applications should be decided within eight weeks from today. 3. Petitions are disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]