IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 SA.No. 8 of 1997() ------------------ AS.29/1989 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA OS.499/1985 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA .................... APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: -------------- EBRAHIM, S/O.MAHAMOOD HAJI, THEKKE ARESSERIL, RESIDING AT THEKKE VALIYARAYIL, PANAVALLY MURI AND VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: --------------- RADHAMANY, RESIDING AT VADAKKE PALAPARAMBU, KANMANI NIVAS, PANAVALLY MURI AND VILLAGE, FROM THEKKEDATHU KATTIKUNNUKARA, CHEMPU VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- S.A.No.8 of 1997 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010. JUDGMENT Defeated defendant is the appellant before me. Respondent/plaintiff sued for declaration of title and prohibitory injunction. Learned Munsiff granted decree in her favour. Appellant unsuccessfully challenged that judgment and decree in A.S.No.29 of 1989. Now the challenge is to the judgment and decree of the first appellate court. 2. Parties have now settled the dispute outside the court and filed I.A.No.917 of 2010 requesting to record the compromise and close the appeal. Terms and conditions of the compromise are stated in I.A.No.917 of 2010. Compromise is accepted and recorded. Accordingly Second Appeal is closed in terms of the compromise. Compromise shall form part of the decree of this Court. No cost. C.M.P.No.7 of 1997 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks 2 Thomas P.Joseph, J. S.A.No.8 of 1997 JUDGMENT 8th April, 2010.