HIGH CUURT OF (,‘HHATTISGARH AT BH‘ASPUii M“ 'Writ Petition (227) N0. 3443 0f 2908 PETITIGNE R (Appiiczmt) RESPONDENTS M (Non-applicants) [—g LN 5?% Kanker RoadwaySi Through the Magaging Partnér, Preetam Siiigh Gafcha, 3/0 fate Jogendar Singh, Aged about 60 years} R/o Civi] Lines; Raipur (CG): VERSUS State Transpmt Appellata Tribunal Raipur (CG). Ragional Transport Authcmty; Raipur {CG} Secretary, Regional Transport Authmity, Raipnr (CG). Syed Anwar Ali S/o Ahmad Alia aged about 42 yziars; R/O (3—18; Sector 5) Devendra. Nagar; Raipuf' (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTI’I‘UTION OF NH (SB: Hon'bne Mr. Satish K. A ’hotriP .m Shn’ PS. Khare; Advocate 1hr the petJtmher. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the 5tate. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. mDIA ) Mmnm (Fmmcu uii - u [th any .1--. u: “cm- LVuVeuma', WI. -. “mo anno\ appearing ior the petitioner submits that this petition has . ; } . Learned counsel hecome infrucmous, as the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 havesemed ihe dispute amicahiy outside the Court. 2. The petition is accordingly dismissed 4:. order as to costs, LA. No. OL apphcatjon for grant ot‘interim relief; also stands disposed of ‘x ; Sd/— having become int‘ructuous. No ~~~~r3X $ahu Satlsh K. Agnihotri Judge a ‘