1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (CONTEMPT JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN CONTEMPT PETITION No.225 of 2010 ************ R.Palanisamy, S/o.R.Rajagopal, Nos.172 to 174, Thottarayan Koil Street, Kattur, Coimbatore 641 009. ... Petitioner Vs Ansal Mishra, I.A.S., Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, Town Hall, Coimbatore 1. ... Respondent Contempt Petition praying that this Court be pleased to punish the respondent for his act of Contempt of Court, deliberately disobeyed the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 03/12/2008 and made in W.P.No.28643 of 2008. The above Contempt Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan, Advocate for the petitioner herein; and upon reading the petition and affidavit of R.Palanisamy, filed herein; the Court made the following order:- This contempt petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court, on 3.12.2008, in W.P.No28643 of 2008. 2. This Court had passed an order, on 3.12.2008, in W.P.No.28643 of 2008, directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.11.2008, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if it had not been disposed of till the date of the said order. 3. From the typed set of papers filed on behalf of the petitioner it is seen that the petitioner had sent a representation, only on 7.10.2009, and a legal notice had been issued by the petitioner's counsel, on 7.12.2009. On receipt of the legal notice issued on behalf of the petitioner the first respondent had issued proceedings, dated 11.1.2010. 4. In such circumstances, this Court does not find that the allegation of the petitioner that the first respondent had wilfully disobeyed the order passed by this Court, on 3.12.2008, cannot be sustained. Hence, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs. Witness the Hon'ble Thiru M.YUSUF EQBAL, the Chief Justice of High Court at Madras, as aforesaid, this the 29th day of June, 2010. sd/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2010. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 1 SMV CONTEMPT PETITION No.225/2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN ORDER DATED : 29/06/2010 FOR APPROVAL :02/09/2010 APPROVED ON :02/09/2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/