IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.2379 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 11, 2010 SUKHWINDER SINGH & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. RB Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The petitioners have approached this Court with the plea that they got married, however, respondents No.5 and 6 are not happy with the marriage and, therefore, are threatening the petitioners. The petitioners and respondents No.5 and 6 are present in court. A common stand has been taken that the petitioners have no grievance. Respondents No.5 and 6 have stated that the marriage of the petitioners has been accepted. There is no cause to continue with these proceedings. Disposed of. February 11, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?