IN THE HIGH COURT OF JuDICATURE AT B;LAsPunv WRIT PETITION (s) No. <§2§$% nag PETITIONER (“”Rajesh Kumar Adile‘ son of Shri Busant Kumm‘ Adile, aged 46 year's, Occupa’rion-Ser‘vice, Presenfly posted d5 Labour VJ .-‘-‘ \W) Inspecfor‘ in 'rhe office of fhe '2,» Assis’ram‘ Labour Commissioner, Bilaspur, R/o Ravi Nagur, Sindhi Colony, Bilaspur (CG) v_s_ (LSTa‘re of ChhaHisgqrh, ’rhr‘ough fhe Socrefory, RESPONDENTS a? Depar’rmen’r of Labour, /%1\ D.K.$. Bhawan, Manfralaya, /\ Raipur‘. 2.The Labour Commissioner, STaTe of Chhaf‘riSgurh Raipur (CG). CLE Jé26 OF THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTI CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . . , ,u. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITIGN (S) NO.522?I2009 PETITIONER Rajesh Kumar Adile Versus RESPONDENTS State of C.G. and another (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Sinqie Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri. J. Present :- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, oounselforthe petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 14‘“ day of September, 2W9) With the consent of learned counset for the parties. the petition is heard finally. (2) Pursuant to the opportunity granted by a coordinate Bench of this Court by order datee 20-07-2009 (Annexure P/13) passeu' in W.P.(S.)No.3585/2009, the petitioner made a representation to the Principal Secretary/Labour Commissioner, Govt. of Chhattisgarh on 28-07-2009 (Annexure Pi14). The representation was decided on 08-09- 2009 (Annexure P/i). (3) On perusal of the decision. it appears that the circular dated 16-06- 2008 (AnnexureP/15) has not been considered. The decision has been taken on the basis of transfer policy ignoring the latest circular on the issue of posting of sports person. (4) Be that as it may. the order dated 08-09-2009 is set aside on the ground that the reievant and latest circular dated 16-06-2008 have not been considered when the authority has considered the old circular dated 22-06-1990 and 31-10-2002. The Principal Secretary is again directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the latest circular dated 16- 06-2008 and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from thedate of the receipt of a copy of this order. (5) in the result, the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicate above. ljSatish K. Agnihotrt. ‘ ,Sdl- ‘V y f l Judge Gowri