IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18602 of 2008 Between: Sri Krishna Chaitanya College of Pharmacy, Gangannagaripalle Village, Basinkonda Panchayat,Madanapalle, Chittoor District, rep. by its President B. Ram Mohan Reddy, S/o.Late B. Venkataramana Reddy, R/o.D.No.III-145-8-A-16-4, Prasantha Nagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Convener, EAMCET-2008, Sanketika Vidya Bahvan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 The Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, rep. by its Chairman. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the action of the respondents in not including the name of the petitioner college in the list of colleges in EAMCET-2008 admissions by counseling and not allotting candidates to the petitioner college in the B. Pharmacy Course I Year, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.VISWANATHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 18602 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by Sri Krishna Chaitanya College of pharmacy, Gangannagaripalle village, represented by its President B. Ram Mohan Reddy assailing the action of the 2nd respondent in not displaying the name of the petitioner college in the list of colleges for admissions in B.Pharmacy course. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri Rathang Pani Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri C. Sudesh Anand, learned standing counsel for Respondent No.2 received notice. 3. The relief sought for in the writ petition is a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the representations submitted by the petitioner with regard to non-inclusion of its college for the admission of candidates in B.Pharmacy course. 4. Indisputably, the petitioner college submitted representations dated 4-8-2008 and 21-8-2008 and their representations are pending consideration with the 2nd respondent. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representations dated 4-8-2008 and 21-8-2008 and pass appropriate orders within a week. No order as to costs. ______________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 29th August, 2008. Note: Operative portion by wire at party’s costs. B/o KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 18602 OF 2008. 29th August, 2008.