IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20668 of 2009 SIYARAM CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 27.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner prays for grant of bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The case was lodged with an allegation that petitioner fired from his Pistol, causing injury in ‘panjara’. Learned counsel submits that it is practically impossible for a person to receive injury in ‘panjara’ and thereafter to run away to the hospital for his treatment. Impugned order reflects that there is/are materials to support the allegation, in so much so the injury report also supports the allegation. It is contended that the occurrence has taken place because of land dispute, which is admitted in the F.I.R. Learned counsel emphasized before this Court that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Petitioner is in custody since 27.2.2009. Having regard to the submissions and the facts appearing from the record, this Court is not pursuaded to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is, 2 therefore, rejected. Petitioner is however granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after five months. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)