IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50982 of 2006 Hirdeshwar Jha, son of Late Babua Jha, resident of village Shihoul, PS Bihara, District Saharsa – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The state of Bihar, 2) Md. Farmud Mian, son of Late Mohammad Mian, village Shihoul, PS Bihra, District Saharsa – Opp. Parties. … 12 10.5.2011 This case relates to allegations arising out of a land dispute. Apparently there was an agreement for selling 3 kathas 13 dhurs of land appertaining to Khata no. 570, plot no. 4366. The trial began. Witnesses were examined. Documentary evidence was also produced. At a belated stage the petitioner filed a petition under section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying therein that he may be permitted to bring on record the agreement to sell and some other documents which would indicate that the opposite party had promised to return the consideration money. Since the matter relates to a dispute involving land, any finding of the court, or any comment by the court, may influence or even create title of some sort in favour of one or the other persons. In such circumstances I think it is a fit case to allow additional evidence to be led in the case. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order before the court hearing the matter within a period of four weeks. This application is allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)