IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2011 / 21ST ASHADHA 1933 LA.App..No. 307 of 2010() ------------------------- LAR.10/2003 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. PRASANNAKUMARI, KAYALVARATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, VADAKKUMBHAGAM. 2. KANAKARAJAN,KAYALVARATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, VADAKKUMBHAGAM. 3. DEVARAJAN,KAYALVARATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, VADAKKUMBHAGAM. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR), SRI.P.SREEKUMAR. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- L.A.A.No.307 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. Eventhough learned senior counsel for the appellant addressed submissions before us, based on the grounds in the appeal memo, having considered the judgment of this Court in L.A.A.No.1023 of 2010 which relates to acquisition of comparable property in the same village for the same purpose, we are of the view that the rate of Rs.4,26,867/- per Are, fixed under the impugned judgment, for the property in Kollam city, acquired for widening of road from Taluk office to Civil Station, challenged in this appeal is not excessive. Hence the appeal is dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/