1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.463 OF 2009 Jagannath T. Jadhav and ors. ..Appellants. Vs. Shri.Ananda Krishna Nalawade and anr. ..Respondents. Mr.A.V.Anturkar for the Appellants. Mr.C.S.Joshi for the Respondent No.1. Ms. V.S.Mhaisapurkar, AGP. For the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 11th March, 2010 PC : 1 This is an appeal filed by the original plaintiffs. The plaintiffs claim to be the tenants of the suit lands. Admitted position is that the respondents are certificated landlords. They hold a Certificate under Section-88-C of the B.T.A.L. Act. It is also an admitted position that the landlords had instituted the eviction proceedings under the said Act. That litigation is also pending in the High Court. That litigation was decided in favour of the landlords upto the 2 M.R.T. The present appellants have filed writ petition No.5332 of 1998. Rule has been issued in the said petition and ad interim relief against the eviction has been granted in favour of the tenants and this ad interim relief has been confirmed on 3.4.2002. In this view of the matter, it is absolutely clear that the landlords are following the due process of law. There is also an absolute injunction operating in favour of the tenants. The reliefs which were sought in the suit had thus become superfluous even during the pendency of the suit. That being the position, the second appeal is dismissed. Both the parties however, agree that they will abide by the order passed in Writ Petition and if possession is required to be taken it will be taken in accordance with law. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)