HIGH CGURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILAS?UR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2394 of 20{}8 PETITIONER Mahesh Purohii Son of Shri G.L.Purohit, aged about 42 years, preseutiy working as Asst Grade I, Directorate Mahila Bal .Vikas Vibhag, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ‘ State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretary, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secretaly, Govennnent of Madhya Pradesh, Gobind Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 3. The Secretary, Woman and Child Development, Dan Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Secretary, Deptt of Woman and Child Development, Govind Baliabh Bhawara — Bhopal (MP) 5. Union of India through — Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievarices and Pension Department of Personnel atld Training, Khan Market, New Delhi. WRIT ?ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ?resent: Shri V.Vijay, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. l and 3. Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate for the Union of India/respondent No. 5. GRAL ORDER (Passed on 01$ day of May, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearihg the matter finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he aioes not want to press this petition on merit except that the petitioner be permitteci to make a representation to the Committee in light of the juégment and order dated 17m Aprii, 2%? passed by this Court in B.R.Godbole Vs. Municipal Corporation Durg and others {2007(2) x \ CGLJ 417}, to which Earned counsel appearing for the respondem/Siats have no objection. Accordingly: the petition is (iisposed of in the same terms Le. the Committea so constitutsd is difecieé i0 comida‘ the representation made by the pét§ti<men if hi$ remesemation is mt consiaiersd emiier. In me 61mm if it is no? comidered earlier, the §esh represeniatien may be considereé, as early as possible within a peried of four months from the date of receipt of yeeresemation. This exercise on the part of the Govermeem of India may be eomp1eted withie a period of four months ii‘om the dais of receipt of a copy ofthis order./ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge w; Sdl— Amii