THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.2424 OF 2008 Dated 11th February, 2008 Between: Fareedunnisa Begum … Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police and Four others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.2424 OF 2008 O R D E R: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 3. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that though she lodged a complaint against respondents 4 and 5 stating that they are harassing her daughter by name Rehana Begum by making frequent phone calls and talking in abusive language, the police are not taking any action against them. It is submitted that at the first instance, the petitioner lodged a complaint with the third respondent and thereafter, as no action was being taken, she lodged a complaint before the Commissioner of Police-the first respondent. The matter was earlier listed on 08-02-2008 and this Court has adjourned the same to enable the learned Government Pleader for Home to get instructions. Today, it is submitted by learned Government Pleader, on instructions, that there was no complaint lodged by the petitioner before the third respondent, but, however, the complaint lodged with the first respondent was transmitted to the third respondent for taking appropriate steps. On receipt of the complaint from the office of the first respondent, a case in Crime No.102 of 2008 was registered and the matter is under investigation. Though it is the case of the petitioner that at the first instance, she lodged a complaint with the third respondent, there is no material to substantiate the same except an averment made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. However, as it is submitted that the complaint lodged by the petitioner with the first respondent is transmitted to the third respondent and the same is registered as Crime No.102 of 2008, I dispose of the writ petition directing the third respondent to complete the investigation in the said crime, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any of the observations made in this order. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J Dated 11th February, 2008 vrn