IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2977 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 29, 2011 Parmod Kumar alias Danny ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel says that the examination of Dr.Sen, PGI, Chandigarh would be essential in the interest of justice. Despite having issued summons to the witness, the Court has closed the evidence by order, though the witness was not served to appear. Counsel contends that the petitioner would suffer serious prejudice in case he is not permitted to examine Dr.Sen, who has operated upon the complainant. The accused in this case are being prosecuted for an offence under Section 307 IPC. Notice of motion. On the asking of Court, Mr.A.S.Jattana, Addl.A.G.Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and says that he would not have any objection in case one opportunity is granted to the petitioner to examine Dr.Sen. The petition is accordingly allowed. The impugned order dated 22.11.2011 is set-aside. One opportunity is granted to the petitioner to examine Dr.Sen. The Court will give dasti notice to the petitioner to be served on Dr.Sen for one date and the responsibility to produce the witness shall rest squarely with the petitioner. November 29, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE