IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9001 of 2008 Between: K. Sarala Kumari W/o Pedakapu R/o Pandalapaka Village, Biccavolu (M), East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavary District at Kakinada. 2 The Joint Collector, East Godavary District at kakinada, 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry, East Godavary District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to make permanent appointment for fair price shop No.14 of Pandalapaka Village, Biccavolu Mandal, East Godavari District, pending revision before respondent No.1. Heard Sri K.Venkatesh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and perused the record. By order dated 04-08-2007, respondent No.3 cancelled the petitioner’s authorization in respect of the above-mentioned shop. The appeal, filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2, was dismissed on 10-01-2008. The petitioner claims that against the said dismissal order, he filed revision petition before respondent No.1 on 15-03-2008. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 has not passed any order directing respondent No.3 not to fill up the vacancy on permanent basis pending disposal of the revision by him. Since the revision petition filed by the petitioner before respondent No.3 is pending, his interest would be adversely affected, if the vacancy of the fair price shop in question is filled up on permanent basis. In such event, third party interests would creep in, and if the petitioner eventually succeeds in the revision petition, that would create needless complication. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 not to fill up the vacancy of fair price shop No.14 of Pandalapaka Village, Biccavolu Mandal, East Godavari District, on permanent basis, till respondent No.3 disposes of the revision petition. Respondent No.3 is directed to dispose of the revision petition within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, this order does not preclude respondent No.3 from making temporary arrangement for distribution of essential commodities. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.11928 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 23rd April, 2008 lur