THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.5194 OF 2011 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 15- 11-2011 passed in IA No.756 of 2011 in OS No.750 of 2009 by the XIII Addl. Chief Judge, (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The defendant in the suit is the revision petitioner herein. The plaintiff-respondent herein filed the said IA under Order 16, Rule 14 CPC r/w. Section 151 CPC to summon Asian Dental Crafts, Bangalore and the manager or any authorized bank officer of Bank of India, Azamabad Branch, Hyderabad, to attend before the Court to give evidence. By the impugned order, the said IA was allowed. Hence, this civil revision petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Perused the impugned order passed by the Court below. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that any transaction between Asian Dental Crafts and the petitoner was with regard to between them and the respondent-plaintiff has nothing to do with the same and, therefore, the Court below ought not to have allowed the IA. 4. Admittedly, the suit is filed for recovery of money and it is evident from the record that the defendant-revision petitioner herein has also made counter claim based on the cheques in question, which are said to be issued by the plaintiff. But the case of the plaintiff is that the said cheques were issued as security, but they were manipulated and altered the figures by the defendant. In view of this serious claim and counter claim, the evidence of the witnesses sought to be summoned by the plaintiff- respondent herein is necessary. In the circumstances, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. The civil revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage itself. _____________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated: 3-12-2011 Nrg.