IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9835 of 2008. Decided on 14th December, 2010. Rakesh Singh and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Ms. Meghna Kashava, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Ms. Meghna Kashava, learned vice counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 14, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?