1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.787/2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. /2010 State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Samudrapur, Distt. Wardha ...Versus... Sachin s/o Govinda Rasekar and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP for applicant] CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 02.02.2011. 1. This is an application for leave to appeal by the State. 2. The respondents were tried for commission of offence under Section 307 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard. 4. Perused the judgment. 5. As the learned Sessions Judge found the contused injury is on the shoulder, Doctor has failed to certify as to the weapon of assault. The alleged injury was caused by axe which is a hard and sharp 2 weapon. Considering that the learned Sessions Judge disbelieved the prosecution witnesses, the result was acquittal. It is not shown that the acquittal is based on failure to consider the evidence or that the conclusions are perverse. 6. In this background, no indulgence is called for. Criminal Application as well as Criminal Appeal have no merit and the same are rejected. Judge Judge ssw