["^TT f^ WRIT PETmON (S) No.4695 of2008 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Kamla Yadav, aged about 39 years, wife of Shri Pushpraj Singh Yadav, resident of Village Fundurdihari, Mahuapara, Tahsil Ainbikapur, Distt. Sar^ija (CG) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through_fhe Secretary, Department of Panchayat aiid Social Wetfare Department, Dau Kalvan Sinsh Bhawan, 2. The Collector,DisU. Sarguja (CG) 3. The Chief Executive OfEcer, Zila Patichayat - WRn" PETmON UNDER ARnCLE 226/227 OF THE.CQNSTn'UTIONLOT SB:;Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.Vijay, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 & 2 ORALORDER 2. By this petition, ttie petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents- authorities to post and give joining to the petitioner at Govemmeat Higher Secondary SchooL Kalyanpur, Surguja as per the order dated 17.7.2008, as even after being selected for the post of Shiksha Kanni Grade I for the District Paacfaayat Surgija, he has nof been allowed to directly when the t may, since there is a statutory provision available to the prefer an appeal, there is no reason to entertain ttiis petition petitioner has not exhausted all fhe statutory appellate to hi i.s case is not one of the case wherein departure frdm nonnal rule ofresorting to statutory forum be allowed. ];a! :ti SWss, 4. -2 • Normally the High.Court should not interfere ifthereis aa adequate efBcacious altemative remedy where hierarchy of appeals is provided by the statute, party must exhaust fhe statutory remedy before resorting to writ jurisdiction, except when a very strong case is made out for making a departure. (Ses State of'H.P. and others_v. Guj'arat Ambuj'a Cement and anothei^, UJ>.State Spinning Co. Ltd. v. R.S.Pandey and another^ and Secy. U.P. High School & Intermediate Education, Allahabad & another v. H.K.Laf, Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of U.P. and others , M.P.State Agro Industries Development Corporation & Ar:r. v. Jahan Khan and PopcomEntertainment and another v. City Indiistrial Development Corpn. and another with Platinum Entertainment and another v. City Industrial Devehpment Corpn. and another ). In view ofttie foregoing, this petition is dismissed as not mamtainable. However, liberty is reserved to the petitibner to take recouree to altemative statutory forum, that may be available to him, i.f so advised. No order asto costs. ——-——^ '' Satisli K. Agmlitotri jS^^Judge : . ', ^- ' (2005) 6 SCC 499 2 (2005) 8 SCC 264 3 (2007) 2 SCC 216 *(2007)8SCC338 3AIR.200.7SC3153 6 (2007)93cc 593