WP(C) 4388/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr NJ Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr S. Sarma, learned State counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2. The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that th ough a process for allotment of land under their possession is going on before t he authority, a move to evict/demolish the temple set up by them is also going o n without finalizing such process and without considering the representation dat ed 17.2.2009 (Annexure-A/1 to the writ petition) submitted by them before the De puty Commissioner, Imphal East, Manipur. Petitioners, therefore, pray for direct ing the official respondents not to evict them from the land under their possess ion without considering the representation dated 17.2.2009 (Annexure-A/1 to the writ petition). Mr Sarma, learned state counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, submits that the authority shall definitely consider the representation dated 17.2.2009 (Annexure-A/1 to the writ petition) and take required steps, onl y after disposal of such representation. In view of the aforesaid position, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner (Revenue), Govt of Manipur to dispose o f the representation dated 17.2.2009 (Annexure-A/1 to the writ petition) filed b y the petitioners and not to evict them from the land under their possession wit hout disposal of such representation. Such disposal shall be made within a perio d of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order passe d today along with a copy of the writ petition and the annexures therewith to be submitted by the petitioners before the said authority. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.