1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.7187 of 2007 In First Appeal No.700 of 2007 (Rahul s/o Arunrao Upganlawar, Nagpur, and others v. Shri Natthu s/o Bajirao Dhage, Nagpur) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri S.V. Manohar, Counsel for Appellants. Shri M.G. Bhangde, Senior Counsel for Respondent No.1, and proposed Respondent No.2. CORAM : K.J. Rohee & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 29th February, 2008 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is fairly admitted by Shri M.G. Bhangde, learned Senior Counsel for the proposed respondent No.2, that the sale transaction in favour of the proposed respondent No.2 is bound by the principles of lis pendence. 3. In view of this submission, we do not see any reason to allow the present application. 4. The application is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE pdl