G^T l-^S^ ffi^^^nn RssTOiR^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT^ETITION (C) NQ^34°)pF^010 PETITIONERS ^, ^ ^/K ^K.y'" %\.2Q" RGB-TGHCL (Joint Venture) Engineers 85 Contractors, Arunima Palace, Plot No.GH-4 Sector-4, Vasundhara, Ghaziabad (U.P.), a Joint Venture Company duly Registered under the Companies' Act, 1956, fhrough its Power of Attorney Holder Ashutosh Sharma, S/o Shri Atma Ram Sharma, aged 38 years, resident of Plot No. ML-2, Sector-11 Vasundhara, Gaziabad (U.P.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^l'T'S^STfc'';;^ -?'<t C^W^f^. /^^% t-i1 'l'1,. •'. ^'\.fe>... o ^:(": 7 1. Union of India through The Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi 110 001 2. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Public Works Department Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) f""'" ' •• ' . . . . . . . • ' 3. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 5. Superintending Engineer (L.W.E.), Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport & Highway, 1 Parliament Street New Delhi 110001 ^-^^E!SNS^3;^^^ s'lw-inflEww tiia^!t^(tniflw? w 'S.*totWS'ES~;I~aste- -7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A^PROPRIATE AND ^TSER^ SUITABLE WRIT OR I^RITS, ^>IRECTION ^R DIRECTION&, ORDER OR ORDERS: t> «,..'^••' ''''.i.l:9SSSi "/.^-'L^ IM^ <i;-::;?f?'i^^^1 SMKS^S^ HI&H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR OIVISION BENCH: 1 ^a, SL.st.^.i »~>.^a*?^.'w -w ** ^h !l ji (<..»>>,< «^n> ?LE SHRI N.K. ;IT PETITION (C) N0.2349/2010 PETITIQNER R&B-T6HCL (Joint Venture) Engineers a Contractors. Union of India and others . Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. . m.P.5. Bhatia, Gy. &ovt. Adyocate for the State. 4 .3 th T--—- <3A4 .n' on tt ijune, cuiu. iysi. J; 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsei for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner does not want to press this petition any more and wants to withdraw the same with a libertv to file a fresh writ Detition if anv cause ot action arises. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 4. With the above condition, the writ petition is dismissed as 5. Conseauently, T-.A. No.l also stands dismissed. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge y-^t.a.-i -T