IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1034 of 2011 Subha Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- 5. 02.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. It is acknowledged that a sum of Rs. 9,93,914/- has been paid to the petitioner towards arrears of rent. It is however contended that a sum of Rs. 1,02,514.93/- paise remained outstanding as the opposite party no. 6 has wrongly calculated the fair rent on the basis of an area lesser than that actually occupied by them. Reliance is sought to be placed on certain reports with regard to the area of occupation. Counsel for the opposite party no. 6 has denied the contentions. Such enquiry is not possible or permissible in the contempt jurisdiction. The petitioner has adequate remedy under Section 7 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 and if so advised he may avail the same. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)