IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA *** SECOND APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2003 Shri Chandrakant Puttu Dessai, s/o Puttu Dessai, major in age, r/o House No.45, Devad Shet, near Tilamol, Quepem, Goa. ... Appellant. Versus M/s. G. N. Agarwal Pvt. Ltd., Reg. Co. having its Head Office at Anand Bhavan, Station Road, Margao, Goa, represented by its Director Shri G. N. Agarwal, major in age, r/o Margao, Goa. ... Respondent. Shri S. S. Kakodkar, advocate for the appellant. Shri S. R. Rivonkar, advocate for the respondent. CORAM : V. G. PALSHIKAR,J. DATE : 9th October, 2003. ORAL ORDER This Second Appeal can be disposed of finally by directing the learned Appellate Court to decide the Appeal as per the provisions of Section 97 of the Civil Procedure Code as also several judgments of the Supreme Court, including in the case of Madhukar & Ors. vs. Sangram & Ors. Madhukar & Ors. vs. Sangram & Ors. Madhukar & Ors. vs. Sangram & Ors., reported in AIR 2001 SC 2171, where it has been observed by the Supreme Court of India that the Appellate Court should formally assess points for determination and adjudicate on each of them. 2. The interests of justice would be served if the impugned Judgment is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Court for decision in accordance with law. The impugned Judgment dated 17th April, 2003, is set aside and the - 2 - matter is remanded to the Appellate Court for decision in accordance with law. Appeal accordingly disposed of. V. G. PALSHIKAR, J. mc.