fl1334 2009 fl.W8O442 IN THE THOR COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED This THE 2 4TH DAY 0? JULY 2009 BEFORE THE HOflLE MRJUSTICE HSLRAMESH WPNe.8flitQflWPJflR1 SETWEEK SIIANKERAT PA 5/0 GURULINGAF 3 A PATIL, AGE: 41 YEARS, 0CC AGRICULTURE, R/0 SHANKERWADI VILLAGE, CHIflAPUR AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MAIN ROAD, SHAHABAD, TQ: CHITPAPUR, DIST: GULBARGA PETITIONER (BY SRI ItKRISHNACHARYA, ADV) AND: I THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GULBARGA 2 THE ASSI COMMISSIONER, SEDAM THE TAHASILDAR CHITrAPUR. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR. SHANKERWADI CIRCLE, TAHASIL OFFICE, CHITI’APUR. 5. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, SHANKERWADI VILALGE, TAHASIL OFFICE, CHITTAPUR. 1334 2009 2 &MiW.8O442±09 o SRI.PAVANKUMAR, 5/0 BASAVAPAJ MAflIMUD, AGE. 20 YEARS, 0CC: STUDENT, R/O SHANKERWADE VILlAGE, TQ: CHIITAPUR RESPONDENTS :HY SRI, AMEET KUMAR DESHPANDE, ADV FOR R6 SRI. S.S.KUMMAN, AGA FOR R-I TO 5) THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDFR ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYiNC TO QUASH THE IMIUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THF LEARNED TAHASILDAR (HTTPAPUR TN FILE NO RFV/R.O R /2l4/2008..09 DT 4.3 2009 AS PFR ANNEXURE D AND IMPUGNED MUTATION IN NAMONA N12 UT, 1 4 2009 IN RESPECT OF LAND SY NO 84 MEAS 7 A RI’S 18 G’JWIAS VILLAGE SHANKERWADI TY-CHITI’APUR AS PFR ANNEXURE F AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This writ petition is directed against the order dated 4.3.2009 (Annexure-D) passed by the Tahasildar, Chittapur, directing transfer of revenue re ord relating to Sv.No.84 measuring 7 acres 18 guntas situate in Shankenvadi village, Chittapur blInk in favour of Respondent No.6. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Respondent No.6. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 submits that the W P No 813341)COQ AO impugned order a Ann xur D is appealable under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 1 find force in the submission made by the learned consc 1 and according1, I decline to entertain the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the aforesaid appellate rerned in accordance with law. Petition dismissed. 3 In view of dismissal of the writ petition, no order riced be passed on MiscW8O442/2OO9 filed for vacating of the inteiirn order. MiscW8O442/2OO9 stands disposed of accordingly. Petition dismissed. Sd/ JUDGE VN/Ata