IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5498 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.03.2011 Gopal Sawrup .... Petitioner Versus Amrit Mehta ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. S.M. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was summoned in a private complaint to face the trial for an offence under Section 420 IPC. Learned counsel has further stated that first anticipatory bail application was rejected by learned Addl. Sessions Judge vide order dated 8.8.2008. On being asked as to why petitioner has not appeared before learned Magistrate in compliance of summoning order after rejection of anticipatory bail application on 8.8.2008, no satisfactory reply is furnished by learned counsel for the petitioner. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in view of undue delay on the part of the petitioner. Dismissed. However, petitioner shall appear before learned Magistrate on 21.3.2011. If petitioner moves regular bail application before the Court on 21.3.2011, same shall be decided at its own merits in accordance with law without any undue delay. (ALOK SINGH) 03.03.2011 JUDGE reena