mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.782 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra Applicant versus Santosh Raghunath Pol & others Respondents P.A.Pol, APP for the State. J.Shekhar, adv. for respondents 1 to 7. S.D.Rupwate, adv. for complainant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 12th March 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned APP for the applicant and the learned advocate for respondents 1 to 7. A case is made out for grant of leave as against respondents 1 and 3 (accused nos.1 and 3). The other accused are not named by the complainant in his evidence. There is no identification parade held. Hence, leave is granted confined to respondents 1 and 3 (accused nos.1 and 3). Appeal is admitted. Application stands dismissed as against rest of the respondents. As the advocate for respondents 1 and 3 waives service, it will not be necessary to initiate an action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (A.S.OKA, J.)