1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2159 OF 2009 Ganesh Velu Devender .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Sartaj Shaikh i/b Mr.Ravi Mungekar for the petitioner Dr.F.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for the State CORAM : J. N. Patel & A.A. Sayed, JJ DATE : December 1, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is being unnecessarily harassed by the Police Authorities at the behest of the respondent nos.1 to 5 who are trying to implicate the petitioner by lodging false complaints. According to the petitioner, this is being done by them as a counter blast to the complaint made by him against the respondent no.1 at Wadala TT Police Station vide C.R. No.29 of 2009 for offences punishable under section 363, 34 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping his minor daughter Sumati. So far 2 as the minor daughter of the petitioner is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the said minor daughter is now with the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent nos.1, 3 and 4 are notorious criminals in Antop Hill and Wadala T.T. Area and there are several cases pending against them at both the police stations and they want to somehow implicate the petitioner in false cases and the petitioner is unnecessarily being harassed by the police. 4. The learned A.G.P. states the chargesheet has already been filed on 26.3.08 against respondent no.1 in C.R.No.29 of 2009. By our order dt.17.11.09, we had directed that in case the Sr.P.I. want the petitioner to attend their police station, they shall issue him a letter in writing as contemplated under section .160 of theCr.P.c. specifying the reasons for which he is required to attend the police station. This sufficiently protects the interest of the petitioner. 5. No further directions are necessary. Petition is disposed of accordingly. ( J. N. Patel, J) (A.A. Sayed, J)