1 Cri.A.3472.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3472 OF 2010 [ The State of Maharashtra Vs. Arjun Jagannath Phad ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.B.V.Wagh,APP for Applicant. Shri.D.S.Koshti,Advocate holding for Shri.Satej S.Jadhav,Advocate for Respondent. .... CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 16.12.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. 2. By this application, the applicant- State is seeking cancellation of the order dated 31.05.2010, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangakhed, District Parbhani, below Exh.1 in Criminal Misc. Application NO. 87 of 2010, by which bail was granted in favour of respondent Arjun. 3. Perusal of the order dated 31.05.2010 2 Cri.A.3472.10 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders goes to indicate that co-accused was granted bail, in Criminal Application No. 1002 of 2010, by this Court. It is noticed that Additional Sessions Judge has granted bail on principle of parity. 4. Learned APP could not point out that the principle of parity should not have been extended to the present applicant. If this be so, Criminal Application will have to be rejected and accordingly it stands rejected. Sd/- [ R.Y.GANOO, J.] MTK