IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1575 OF 2006 Between: Katari Rangarao …Petitioner A n d Bendapudi Venkata Lakshmanarao (died) Smt.Alluri Saradha and others ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1575 OF 2006 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for Respondent No.7. Respondent No.1 is reported dead. Civil Revision Petition against Respondents 2 to 6 and 8 to 11 stood dismissed for default. 2. The petitioner filed A.T.C.No.18 of 1993 under Section 16 of the A.P (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act seeking a declaration that he is the cultivating tenant of the schedule land of Ac.44-33 cents in R.S.No.314/7 of Bapirajugudem village. The respondents/landlords contested the same. During enquiry, P.Ws.1 to 3 were examined and Exs.A-1 to A-12 were marked on behalf of the petitioner. R.Ws.1 to 3 were examined and Exs.B-1 to B-3 were marked on behalf of the respondent. 3. On a consideration of the evidence available on record, the trial Court held that the petitioner failed to establish that he is the cultivating tenant of the schedule land and, therefore, he was not entitled for declaration prayed for. The petitioner filed appeal in A.T.A.No.158 of 1998. By the impugned judgment dated 03.01.2006, the learned District Judge dismissed the appeal and confirmed the findings of the Special Officer, holding that the petitioner is not a tenant of the schedule land. The impugned orders do not suffer from any illegality or material irregularity warranting interference by this Court. The concurrent finding recorded by the Courts below holding that the petitioner failed to establish his claim that he was the cultivating tenant of the schedule land does not call for any interference by this Court. It is open to the petitioner to avail other remedies, if any, available under law. 4. In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 09th August, 2011 Lrkm.