IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 1218 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== ============================================================== ASHOKBHAI M MORADIA - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &5 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR JM Barot for Mr.RV SAMPAT for Petitioner No(s).: 1. Ms. ArchnaRawal, AGP for Respondent No(s).: 1. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 2,3. RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No(s).: 4. MR RC KAKKAD for Respondent No(s).: 5. ============================================================== CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 21/06/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 of any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? 1.Mr. JM Barot, learned advocate for Mr. RV Sampat, learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions received from Mr. RV Sampat, learned advocate who has appeared before the trial court, states that this Civil Revision Application is arising from the order passed in Regular Civil Suit No.383 of 2000 which has been disposed of by the learned Civil Judge (SD), Junagadh. This CRA has, therefore, become infractuous. He therefore urges that appropriate orders may be passed in this CRA. 2. The statement made by Mr. JM Barot, learned advocate for the petitioner has been endorsed by Ms. Archna Rawal, learned AGP for State and Mr. RC Kakkad, learned advocate for respondent No.5. They also urged that appropriate orders may be passed in view of the statement made by Mr. Barot. 3. In view of the above statement made by Mr. Barot and endorsement made by Ms. Archna Rawal, learned AGP for the State and Mr. RC Kakkad, learned advocate for respondent No.5, this CRA is disposed of as it has become infrcatuous with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. Interim Relief, if any, shall stand vacated. (A.M. Kapadia, J.) ... (karan)