IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14787 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 12, 2011 Naveen Kishore & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners were initially appointed to cope up with the emergent situation arising out of strike. On strike coming to an end, their services were terminated, but they were absorbed as Octroi Clerks. Some clerks were absorbed on regular basis, whereas some were adjusted as adhoc employees. The petitioners were such employees, who were given adhoc appointment. The grievance of the petitioners is that their services have not been regularised for all these years. The petitioners have served a legal notice, which is not being decided. Without going into the merits of the claim for regularisation as per the latest legal position, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice served by the petitioners within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. August 12, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE