1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJ. AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. J U D G M E N T S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.712/99 VINOD VS. MOHD. UMAR AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT:- MARCH 2, 2009, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GUMAN SINGH Mr. K.N. Tiwari, for the appellant, Mr. Satyendra Sharma for the Resp. No. 3, BY THE COURT (ORAL) Heard. This appeal has been preferred in Claim Petition No. 595/98 , by Vinod injured , for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur, vide Award dated 6.3.1999, whereby a sum of Rs.10,000/- , was awarded by way of compensation for the injuries caused in the accident. The only challenge in the appeal pertains to quantum of compensation. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that three injuries were caused to the injured and one of the injury was on head, though no fracture was caused and no disability was occasioned but looking to the nature of injury amount deserves to be 2 enhanced. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent , supported the award of the learned Tribunal on the ground that the adequate compensation was awarded on the basis of evidence adduced during the enquiry and the same calls for no interference. Having considered the arguments and going through the award as well as the record of the case, it is revealed that no disability was caused to the injured and that three simple injuries were caused to him. The Tribunal has already awarded a sum of Rs. 5,000/- for loss of income for 15 days and a sum of Rs. 5,000/- as against the injuries caused to the injured. Thus, there is no ground to assume that the injured has not been adequately compensated. Therefore, the appeal deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly the appeal stands dismissed. (Guman Singh)J.