IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8034 of 2008 Mansoor Alam, son of Badrud Doza, village Mansara, PS Jamalpur, District Darbhanga – petitioner. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Ashok Kumar Sahni, Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat Raj Mansara, PS Jamalpur, Dist. Darbhanga – opp. parties. 2 25.1.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by order, dated 9.10.2007 passed by the Sessions Judge, Darbhanga in Cr. Revision No. 248/2007. The impugned order was against the order taking cognizance under sections 420 and 406 of the Penal Code. The petitioner filed a complaint against the Block Education Extension Officer alleging that a demand of Rs. 50,000/- was made for appointing the petitioner as Primary Teacher (Urdu Trained). According to the petitioner he was selected and was at serial no.6. Despite his selection he was not appointed on the said post because of the aforesaid demand of Rs. 50,000/-. The court below has considered the fact that the Allahabad High court in CWJC No. 19324/1999 disposed of on 11.5.1999 has recognized the degree of Jamia Urdu, Aligarh upto 6.8.1997. The examination of the petitioner is said to have been held after the cut off date and as such this court finds that in fact the petitioner was not qualified for selection. The allegation that the petitioner was not selected because he did not pay the bribe to the selection committee obviously falls flat on the ground and is 2 unbelievable and improbable in view of the aforesaid facts. If the petitioner had genuine demand that he was entitled to be appointed, he could have well moved in a writ petition instead of filing this case which prima facie appears to have been filed to cause harassment to the opposite parties. I, thus, see no illegality in the revisional order. This application is dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)