IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29293 of 2011 Raj Kishore Yadav @ Bhauki Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 16.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Number of firing is one plus more that is specified in the F.I.R. that miscreants present at informant’s door 2-3 in numbers were causing firings. Petitioner is only named, rest are unknown. No doubt, it never can be said with all certainty that petitioner’s shot hit the deceased, but it is apparent in the case that the only purpose of miscreants was to kill the deceased, so exoneration on the ground of vagueness in the case is not justified. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for regular bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)