IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 3615 of 2008. Decided on: 7th September, 2010. Bhagat Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- Board of Directors, H.P. State Cooperative Milk Producers’ Federation Ltd. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate vice Mr. R.L. Kaith, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. M.R. Verma, Advocate. Respondents No. 6, 8 and 9 already exparte. None for respondents No. 4, 5 and 7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): I have gone through the pleadings. Infact, the petitioner has already made a representation to the Board of Directors, H.P. Milkfed, which was rejected. However, in the interest of justice, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation to the Registrar, Co-operative Societies for the redressal of his grievance within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the Registrar, Co-operative Societies shall decide the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking order within a further period of three six weeks after the production of a certified copy of this judgment. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 07, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?