. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 212 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.Prashant Hagai h/f Mr.K.S. Patil for the applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 19TH JULY 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. This application is filed by the applicant for condonation of delay in filing the Criminal Revision Application. 2. In paragraph 2 of the application, it is stated that there is a delay of 118 days in filing the revision application. In paragraph 4 of the application, the applicant has given two reasons for the delay. In the earlier part of paragraph 4, it is stated that due to his service, the - 2 - applicant could not approach the advocate in the trial court and could not apply for a certified copy, which was applied late and ultimately received on 20th January 2007. In the later part of paragraph 4, it is stated that due to insufficient funds, the applicant could not come to Bombay to instruct the advocate. The second ground is contradicted by the first ground which itself shows that the applicant is in service. No particulars of his salary are mentioned to show that the salary was so meagre that he had no money for going to Bombay. 3. In the circumstances, delay is not satisfactorily explained. The application is therefore dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)