IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.15869 of 2008. Decided on: April 29, 2010 Tikhu Ram ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Ms. Bhavana Datta, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since he has not been paid salary for the period he actually worked. In case the petitioner has been in service at the relevant time, there is no reason to deny the salary. There will be direction to the second respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action to disburse the eligible benefits to the petitioner, if not already disbursed within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 29, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.