IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8400 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:23.12.2010. Surat Singh ...Petitioner Versus Mandeep Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. T.N.Sarup, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 13.10.2010 whereby 8 kanals of land of the petitioner has been ordered to be attached and sold in order to effect recovery of the due amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the said statement was made by learned counsel for the decree-holder and not by learned counsel for the judgment-debtor. He submits that recovery can be effected by sale of 4 kanals of land instead of 8 kanals of land, therefore, the learned Executing Court may be directed to put to sale 4 kanals of land of the petitioner instead of 8 kanals of land for the purpose of recovery of amount due. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the present revision petition is allowed and it is directed that 4 kanals of land of the petitioner be put to sale and if the recovery is not effected from the sale of 4 kanals of land, the other portion of the 8 kanals of land, which has been ordered to be sold, may be put to sale. With this modification in the impugned order, the present revision petition is disposed of. Order dasti. December 23, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE