i^T91- ^!> HIGH^OURTOFCHHATTISGARH^BILASPUR PETITIONER Applicant W.P^(U/A^2?lNo^J5198^f 2009 Amandeep Singh, S/o. Sardar Jeet Singh Bagga, Aged about 27 years, R/o. Avanti Vihar Colony, Police Station Telibandha, Tahsil Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus RESPQNDENTS Non-applicant Araardeep Kaur, W/o. Araandeep Singh Bagga, Aged about 22 years, through: Narendra Singh Khanduja, R/o. Khariyar Road, Ward No.12, Khariyar Road, Tahsil and District Nuvapada, Orissa Writ Petition under Article 227 oftheConstitutipn oflndia Appearance : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. QRAL ORDEJl (11.09.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. The petitioner/husband has filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of order dated 22.8.2009 passed in Civil Suit No. 188A/2008 by the First Additional Rrincipal Judge Family Court, Raipur, whereby, the said Court has set aside the ex-parte proceedings drawn against the respondent/wife on 20.4.2009 and has directed to file reply of the interim application filed u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel for the petitioner, argues that the Family Court acted in excess jurisdiction while passing the said order because the application filed vide Annexure-P/3 does not say for setting aside the ex-parte order and that in the said application, it has been mentioned that the application for setting aside the ex-parte order shall be filed by the respondent. The contents of the application (Annexure-P/3) would show that the same has not been drafted by any lawyer and it was drafted by the respondent and maternal uncle of the respondent. In the second paragraph of the application, they have given a reason for not appearing on 20.4.2009. Therefore, if the Family Court has treated ,this application as an application for setdng aside ex-parte order, no s»a •:^:. • 'i '!rlL-,s»>> 1 I 1 \ "'":L.iJ :'i^,-.<C^F "•'eKs:SS"'' W.P. (U/A 227) No. 5198 of2009 material irregularity appears to have been committed by the said Court warranting interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. For the foregoing reasons, I do not find any scope for interference in the order impugned. The W.P. (U/A 227) No. 5198/2009 is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed at the motion stage itself. ,. _.^-^—- ---T Sd/- . . _ \ S^aKumarSinha ^