63 & 64 22.07.2021 mb C.O. No. 1640 of 1992 with C.O. No. 3170 of 1993 with C.P.A.N. 574 of 2006 Ananda Prasad Ghosh Vs. Sampat Mal Rakhecha (Via video conference) Mr. Ananda Prosad Ghosh, Mr. Uttam Kumar Bhattacharya …for the petitioner Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that C.O. No. 1640 of 1992 and C.O. No. 3170 of 1993 were already disposed of. As such, no further order need be passed in respect thereof. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in his usual fairness, further submits that the order, regarding which contempt was alleged, has been satisfied and, as such, the contempt application has become infructuous. Accordingly, C.P.A.N. No. 574 of 2006 is dismissed as infructuous. There will be no order as to costs. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)