1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.38 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2006 Ramlal Siddhi Gupta. ..Appellant. V/s. Fine Tone Realtors Pvt.Ltd.& Ors. ..Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.39 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.38 OF 2006 Radhey Shyam Gupta. ..Appellant. V/s. Fine Tone Realtors Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.40 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2006 Gulabchandra B. Gupta. ..Appellant. V/s. Fine Tone Realtors Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.41 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2006 Kamala Prasad V.Gupta. ..Appellant. V/s. Fine Tone Realtors Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH 2 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.42 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2006 Lalchand Pyarelal Gupta. ..Appellant. V/s. Fine Tone Realtors Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.G.C.Singh for appellant. Mr.Niranjan Pandit i/b Shah & Sanghavi for respondent No.1. Mrs. Geeta Joglekar for BMC in all matters. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2006. DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2006. DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. These appeals are directed against refusing to grant ad-interim relief. Counsel for the appellants submits that these appeals be disposed of with direction to the trial court to decide the Notice of Motion to finally as expeditiously as possible. This request is made in the backdrop of the fact that the Notice of Motion pending before the trial Court is already listed today for hearing before the trial Court. The pleadings in the Notice of Motion are already completed. 3 3. In the circumstances, appeals as well as civil applications are disposed of as not pressed with direction to the trial Court to finally dispose of the concerned Notice of Motion as expeditiously as possible preferably before end of April, 2006. This direction has to be observed as the grievance of the appellants is that they have been forcibly dispossessed from the suit premises. All questions to be decided in the Notice of Motion are left open.