.^G 0. my : ^R^fN. ^o$ro Tr^q j"fr?Tf=:iqT sffyq?^, TFW?.. "^y- L^wy^w^—^^ 3f1-.?.".?NT-^T/^^^ f^m f?rfo -v—/—^__ F=^ ^qrT c-Tmr 3I3^>, ^- 3lfsf^?. f^s HTrftwTg- ^rm mr ^...,-^., /'!?S£ i'S^'...I.^.1< 1 by ^hfl^M^ " 1•! 1 —•' ^- ^-^^^ RAr::Ur^ ^r^rf^ srfy^w 3rfyf=i^ 1995 ^t y'rTr 19 ^ 3FPpfH 3,T^?f- q--^ ) I/ 2/ sft-i^cpr =rra mr tmr - q^=^ ^qrT prr??r 3HN^, ^- srPa^ "CTrFfTTTr, TrGpr^fr^ §36^g-§ 2I3gff-.?I_f§95DI - I. B'FrfrWg- m^ %rTr : wfm, TruTF^" BTFft^g" ir?R Tfqq-T | 2. ^•N;5T, f5]Frr qrr^fpm Tr^rcRr^ i '^ 1. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3494 OF 2005 PETITIONERS Navindra Kumar Lal Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & another Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Manish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER rORAU (Passed on this 9th day ofApril, 2010) 2. Challenge jn this petition is to the transfer orders dated 16.10.1996 (Annexure A/1) & 18.08.1998 (An.nexure A/2). 3. At this stage, the pefition has become infructuous, as transfer orders passed in the year 1996 & 1998 must have been given effect to and nothing at this stage, survives for adjudication. 4. At this stage, learned cpunsel for the petitioner submits that the salary of the petitioner has not been paid for some period. In this regard learned counsel for the State submits that from the order dated 12.09.2000 (Annexure R/6), it can be seen that the d6cision regarding payment of salary to the petitioner has already been taken. 5. According the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation, ifdispute in regard to salary, still survives. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge