[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.290 OF 2008 1. Sakharam Dhondu Muradnar 2. Dyaneshwar Sakharam Muradnar 3. Bhagwat Sakharam Muradnar 4. Balu Sakharam Muradnar All r/o Nimgaon Tal.Sinnar Dist.Nasik ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.P.B.Shah advocate for applicants Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants-original accused and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants have been convicted under Sections 323 and 324 r.w.34 of IPC for causing hurt and grievous hurt complainant. 3. The learned advocate for the applicants states that the applicants are not challenging the [-2-] conviction and the only prayer of the applicants is that sentence may be reduced to the period undergone by the applicants. The learned APP has no objection to the sentence being reduced. 4. Looking to the fact that offence pertains to the year 1999 and the other facts and the above facts, I am inclined to reduce the sentence to the period undergone by the applicants. 5. In the result, the conviction of the applicants under Sections 323 and 324 r.w.34 of the IPC imposed by the learned IInd Jt.Judicial Magistrate F.C. Sinnar, dated 14.10.2003 in Regular Criminal Case No. 20 of 1999 is confirmed. However, the sentence of imprisonment is reduced to the period undergone by them. The applicants be released forthwith if not required in any other case. 6. Revision application is partly allowed. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]