!! 1 !! IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1735/2009 (Sunita & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of order :: 18.03.2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.G.J. Gupta, for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners have filed applications under Rule 158 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 for allotment of residential plots under the category of Other Backward Class. As per petitioners, the case was considered by the Gram Panchayat and a resolution was passed for allotment of land to the petitioners on 20th November, 2004. According to the petitioners, a decision was taken by the Gram Panchayat, Panniwali for allotment under which they deposited Rs.1,350/- in !! 2 !! the Gram Pancyayat. But later on in the meeting held on 05th July, 2005, another resolution was passed, whereby the allotment made in favour of petitioners was cancelled. The said resolution of cancellation was challenged by the petitioners by way of filing revision before the Additional Collector (Administration), Sri Ganganagar. The revision petition filed by the petitioners was registered as Panchayat Revision No.155/2005 and the same was decide vide order dated 30th January, 2008. Now in the year, 2009 petitioners are challenging the said order after lapse of one year that too on the ground that they have produced all the relevant documentary evidence before the Additional Collector (Administration), Sri Ganganagar to show that they are resident of the village Panniwali, but the material placed by the petitioners before the Additional Collector (Administration), Sri Ganganagar was not considered and straightaway while ignoring documents it is observed in the order that no cogent evidence has been produced by the petitioners to show that they are resident of the village Panniwali. Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently argued that all the documents, which !! 3 !! are annexed with this writ petition were placed before the Additional Collector (Administration), Sri Ganganagar for consideration, but none of the documents were considered by the said authority while deciding revision petition filed by them. If contention of the petitioner is correct, then petitioner is to file an application for reviewing the order with regard to non- consideration of the documents by the Additional Collector (Administrator), Sri Ganganagar, who has decided the revision petition. No case for interference in the matter is made out. Hence, this writ petition dismissed. However, in the event of filing review petition, it is expected from the revisional authority that he will consider all the grounds with regard to evidence produced by the petitioners alongwith revision petition and will pass reasoned order in accordance with law. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-