1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.9360 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 K.Pushpavalli :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 2.P.V.Muthiya, Mellatheru, Watrap, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. :Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to forbear the second respondent from entering in the land in Survey No.7/8 to an extent of 0.73.5 Hec. in Watrap, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. For Petitioner : M.G.Thiruvarutselvan ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to forbear the second respondent from entering in the land in Survey No.7/8 to an extent of 0.73.5 Hec. in Watrap, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 2.Heard Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.The subject matter of the Writ petition is Government Promboke land. The petitioner and the second respondent have been making claims over the Government promboke land before the Revenue Authorities. 4.The petitioner states that the Tahsildar issued settlement patta in favour of one Chellathai. The said proceedings was challenged before the Revenue Divisional Officer. The Revenue Divisional Officer has set aside the order of the Tahsildar and confirmed the settlement patta issued in favour of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, the said Chellathai filed a revision petition before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 the District Revenue Officer and the District Revenue Officer remanded the matter matter to the Sub-Collectors. The Sub- Collector in his proceedings M.M.3938/1997, dated 07.07.2000 passed an order cancelling the patta granted in favour of both the parties. As against the said order, the petitioner filed a revision before the District Revenue Officer, which is pending enquiry. 5.The petitioner now challenges the adverse order passed by the Tahsildar stating that the Tahsildar has no authority to pass order. Unfortunately, it is petitioner who has invited the order of the Tahsildar by filing W.P.No.2884 of 2011 to consider the representation. In compliance of the order of this Court, the Tahsildar has passed this order. 6.Since the revision petition is pending before the Revenue Authorities and in view of the dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the petitioner's case except to give liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court to redress her grievance, in accordance with law. Therefore, finding no merits, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: The Tahsildar, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. Pm RP/10.10.2011/2P/2C. W.P.(MD)No.9360 of 2011 09.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/