THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1647 of 2010 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 19.02.2010 in F.C. I.A,. No.494 of 2009 in F.C. O.P. No.47 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum- Additional District & Sessions Judge, Karimnagar. 2. The respondent herein is the wife of the petitioner herein. The court below, after considering the evidence on record, directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance @ Rs.6,000/- per month to the respondent and also directed him to pay an amount of Rs.3,000/- to her towards legal expenses. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the respondent is also doing a job and she is not depending upon her husband; that, the petitioner obtained loan of Rs.27,00,000/- from ICICI Bank and has to pay monthly instalments at Rs.24,000-, and so, the interim maintenance granted is on higher side, and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent contended that, considering the income of the petitioner and the facts and circumstances of the case, the trial Court rightly granted interim maintenance, and the same is not on higher side, and hence, he prays to dismiss the revision petition. 5. The relationship between the petitioner and the respondent is not in dispute. Though it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent is also doing a job, no document is filed to show that the respondent is earning money. Admittedly, the petitioner is working as Software Engineer and getting income of Rs.51,000/- and odd, per month. Even if the loan instalment of Rs.24,000/- per month is deducted, he would get income not less than Rs.27,000/- and odd per month. Considering the income of the petitioner, granting of interim maintenance @ Rs.6,000/- per month, cannot be said to be on higher side. Even that amount is hardly sufficient to meet both ends of the respondent. Upon considering the evidence on record in right perspective, the trial Court granted the interim maintenance, and there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 04.06.2010 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1647 of 2010 04.06.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1647 of 2010 04.06.2010 Between: Mavuram Varaprasad Reddy …Petitioner And Mavuram Sujatha …Respondent