f @3 $g§§§i§ gmgg QEM? BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P. s No. égm / 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENS T Basan‘r Kumar Tiwar‘i, aged abouT 67 years, S/o Late shri N.P. Tiwar'i, Re‘rir‘ed (during Termina’rion period) from The pos’r of Assisfam‘ Development Exfension Officer, Mungeli, Disff. Bilaspur (C.G.) R/o Village Madwani, Posf Baifalpur, Dis’r’r: Bilaspur (6.6.) VERSUS 1. / Sfm‘e of Chha’rfisgarh, Through : The Secrefory, Panchayof and Rural Developmenf, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. (The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Dis‘r’r. Bilaspur (6.6.) // , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’ 1g H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6910 OF 2010 Basant Kumar Tiwari Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. .4 r \ .. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 27‘ day of January. 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the order dated 9.1 1 .2000 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, before the State Government on 30.12.2000 (Annexure P-2), but till date no decision has been taken by the appellate authority. Shri Rajput, further submits that on the last date of hearing i.e. on 29.1 1 .2010, the State/respondents was granted two [weeks time on the request to verify whether appeal had been decided or not. Two months have passed, the State/respondents is not in position to submit any information. Thus, the averment of the petitioner with regard to pendency of the appeal appears to be admitted by the State! respondents. / Accordingly, the [State authorities are directed to consider and decide the appeal (Annexure P-2) as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks. ln view of foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri' Judge ashok Petitioner