IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.21 of 2008 SURESH NARAYAN LALL & ORS Versus BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD &ORS ----------- For the appellants: Mr. Chakradhari Sharan Singh Mr. Raju Kumar Singh For the respondents 1 to 6 : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 2nd September, 2008 We heard counsel for the appellant and perused the order passed by the single judge impugned in this appeal as well as available material. 2. The counsel for the appellant does not dispute that sanctioned scheme is a time bound scheme. 3. Obviously, because of non-payment of instalments in time by the allottees, the construction work could not be completed and for completion of construction, the price of the materials increased. Besides that, there was increase in interest compounded on the amount released by HUDCO. 4. All these aspects having been considered by the committee pursuant to the order of this court, re-exercise in 2 extraordinary jurisdiction is not warranted. 5. Dismissal of the petition by the single judge cannot be faulted 6. Letters patent appeal is dismissed in limine. R.M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/-