Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2011. Date of decision: November 07, 2011. Harjinder Kumar alias Happy .. Petitioner VERSUS The State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.A.K.Khunger, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kiratpal Singh Sidhu, DAG., Punjab. Mr.Raman Mohinder, Advocate, for the complainant. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). It has been contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case on account of the fact that the petitioner had married the deceased against the wishes of her family members and that the deceased did not have any social connection with her parents after the marriage. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and considered the facts and circumstances of this case. In view of the unnatural death of the deceased within a period of 7 years and on account of allegations of demand of dowry, a legal presumption ...1 Crl. Misc. No.M-26062 of 2011 under Section 113-A of the Evidence Act, arises against the petitioner. As to what extent the petitioner is able to rebut the presumption cannot be appreciated unless and until material complainant-witnesses Subhash Chander an Ratti Mohan are examined. Disposed of as withdrawn, at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again after recording the statement of the complainant. The trial Court shall make earnest endeavour to record the statement of the complainant within a period of 2 to 3 months. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE November 07, 2011. rka ...2