-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3718 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.3718 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.3718 OF 2007 Shakti Sikandarlal Kapoor, .. Petitioner Vs Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and anr. .. Respondents. Mr A.R.Pande, for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.Bhosale,J. CORAM : D.B.Bhosale,J. CORAM : D.B.Bhosale,J. DATE : 13.02.08. DATE : 13.02.08. DATE : 13.02.08. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition is directed against an order dated 30.11.2006 by which the Chamber Summons taken out by the petitioner-plaintiff seeking amendment of the plaint has been dismissed. I perused the order and the other material placed before the court. Apart from the observation made by the trial court in paragraph 3 of -2- the order that the plaintiff has been prolonging the progress of the case by repeatedly making applications in piecemeal, I am also satisfied that by taking out the instant Chamber Summons the petitioner has made one more attempt to prolong the litigation. The petitioner is enjoying the interim relief. The judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner of the Supreme Court in Andhra Bank V ABN Amro Bank N.V., AIR 2007 Supreme Court 2511 and Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. K.K.Modi, 2006(4) Mh.L.J.719, in my opinion, would not apply to the facts of the present case. In my opinion, for the reasons stated in the impugned order, no case for interference by this Court in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. The writ petition is dismissed. Hearing of the suit is expedited. (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.)