IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 39 of 2001 Date of decision: 06.12.2010. Rakesh Chandel and others …Petitioners. Versus Kulwant Singh and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents 1 to 3: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondent No.4. Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A.G. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. This petition is directed against the order of the Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings dated 24.2.2000. 2. A bare perusal of the impugned order shows that this order is based on an agreement reached between the parties. A compromise appears to have been affected before the Additional Director whereby it was directed that Kulwant Singh respondent No.1 would give 18 biswas of land to predecessor-in-interest of petitioner 1(a) to 1(d), Bhagat Ram and Smt. Maya Devi. This is an amendment made under Section 54 and the amendment has been signed by the parties. Once 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 the statement of amendment has been signed by Piar Singh and Bhagat Ram they cannot challenge the same. Hence, this petition is totally misconceived and is accordingly rejected. No order as to costs. 6th December, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge