IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7503 of 2009 GUNJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner is the husband and allegation of demand of dowry and cash has been alleged against him. Reality is that differences are only matrimonial for day today affairs. Joint account has been opened in name of the informant along with the petitioner to have their savings and in P.F. also the informant has been made nominee. Further the petitioner has tried his best to talk but the informant never cooperated even then the petitioner is apprehending his arrest which never can be justified at the moment. I agree with the submission. In the discussed suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Gardanibagh P.S.Case No.190 of 2008, the above named - 2 - petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI