( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5769 OF 2010 Raju s/o Mansing Singhal PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. M.P. Kale, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for the respondent No. 5. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 27th July, 2010] PER COURT : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.T. Shelke, learned advocate, appears for the respondent No. 5. Learned AGP appears for the respondent No. 1. The petition is against the re-allocation of wards and, therefore, it does not require any indulgence of this Court. Hence, the petition is dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp5769-10