CAW/156/2010 & RPW.ST.17534/2010 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.156 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.17534 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5277 OF 2006 M/s.Ekatmik Adivasi Vikash Prakalp ... Applicant/Petitioner V/s. Shri Chandu Suresh Morgha ... Respondent Mr.Mr.P.G. Sawant, AGP,`B' Panel for Applicant/Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 18, 2010 P.C.: 1. The civil application has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the review. Nobody appears for the respondent. 2. For the reasons stated in the civil application, it is allowed and disposed of accordingly. CAW/156/2010 & RPW.ST.17534/2010 : 2 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.17534 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5277 OF 2006 M/s.Ekatmik Adivasi Vikash Prakalp ... Applicant/Petitioner V/s. Shri Chandu Suresh Morgha ... Respondent Mr.Mr.P.G. Sawant, AGP,`B' Panel for Applicant/Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 18, 2010 P.C.: 1. The review petition has been filed on the ground that the order of the Division Bench in Writ Petition No.5995 of 2004 dated 15.9.2004 has not been brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge while passing the order dated 22.11.2006 in Writ Petition No.5277 of 2006. In my opinion, the order passed by the Division Bench does not in any way indicate that the petitioner is not an industry. Moreover, the order under review has been passed on the facts and circumstances in the case before the learned Judge while passing the order. 2. No new material has been placed before this Court. The order of the Division Bench has been passed on the facts in the case before the Division bench. 3. Review Petition is rejected.