3mm mm ’ @‘ INTHfEmGHCOURT OFJUDICATUREATBILASPUR (1G ‘ ‘ W.’P.(S)1gL//_93) /2009 ‘ ’ [ ;/ PETITIéNER z /" ChamchandraBhute S/o Shri RadhelaIBhute, J j L Age about 46 years; / I { 1 <‘ R/o Shop No. 10, Adivasi Vikas'Parisar, L Chitrakut Road, iJagdalpur/(CG) ‘f17"”“i o,“ ‘ «x - . $‘ Dimrapal, Tah. & District—Jagdalpur (CG) WRITPETIHONUNDERARIICIEszzaorniE CONSIITUIION ’ OFINDIA ’ l. ParticularsM . . > / ’ K / ; 1 / It j ‘ \\, ..... VERSUS V ‘ o I jyl" RESmNDENTS (/1. State ofChhanisgarh ‘ § ‘ L \ ' , r Through- - ‘ Secretary, . Scheduled Caste; Scheduled Tribe. S f > and Bakward Class. Welfare Department, I i ‘ , 1 ' V1, j L g2. L VD.K.S.Bhawan,Mantralaya,‘Raipur (CG) of The Commissioner, ‘ F \ . ' V K Tribal Development ;‘ 53 . Q? r); Raipur(c.G.) ' E I e§‘ /r 3. ‘ The Secretary, V ’ beqb’h , Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, HIGH COURT OF CHHA’MISGARH AT BILASPUR‘ ‘ SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.(S) NO. 4733 [2009 huand Bhute Versus Stt§e fC 8 Oer a o/G. 5 ths hr .ale ouSe r htitier. shr .a, . o St 6..29) With the nen f e cnel for t par, mate ‘ r finl. r onten o os f petitioe is a er o entica pet de h e s ceis , o 0 S all . Oers) He submits hat c is qel verd With he oventone fr at h e y e perie h ti tin ibt o ile resenti ere respont e v bts deon may e. ssued fo diding eesetati exitiouy. sel fr t Stt subms hat t this tae annot Coun o he ae it t a sg he c make atemen as Whete the case f e itne is vered wit th orr s in aforeio ''t eon s lied pon b th ptiione H fuher subts t e i pne ill m a restain te sm d decided in accordance with law after scrutinizing the factual and legal position of the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with he liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality. of filing any such i representation by the petitioner within a period of three weeks i, rom the date of receipt of (copy of this order, it is expected that the same would be decided Within a further period of two months. I ocst o th oué he ties the tr ' is head aly Cntio fithe cunel or‘the nr tht nUmb f idl tiions have, been deeid by tis Court and on uch as WAR N. 4108/205 (mt. A.L Vs. State of,C.G 85 th. t his ase suary coe t abmeid case and thereoe tis stage h ma b mttd to witdraw hs petio with lery t f i reptaon bfo den No.1‘ H howeer sumi that Ir ircti b i r ec his rprnon i pedsl any stt to hr o th petior co h e de pased emntned Wn ptiti a re u y e etr. e rt mi tha if th etitior w ake eprento h ae woul be It is made clear that this Court has not‘expressed any opinion on meritsvof the case and the respondent No.3 would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with 1 ‘ xlaw. ' Sdl— ‘ritinkeri‘diwak = i ' Judoe PETETIONER Carchra RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$TITUTION OF INDIA' Appearance: . Si S.PK, cnl fo teipeon i PDs GZA fr the ate; ORDER (20800 t f Pe i