'\. 1)^/6S BEFORE TH£ N.P.STATl- fiDnitiISTKA.TIVE TRIBUNAL AT 3ABfiLPUR t2.^^— , : ' O.S.NO. ' /1995 - prabhuoayal aged 2 yrs> s/o shri tjdairan >Lsbour, 0/e Exe'cytive Engiiar, Uater fjesourcss oepartmeRt,Kauardba> Oivision»Kauardha»Bistt-Ra.jnaBdgaon, fi/o Baniapara 8adal,Keuardha»RaJnandgaon. -Applicant V er su s I.Stats of Badhya Pradesh tiirough ths Secr'etary,yatsr Resourcss Depart- inent»Vallabb Bhauan, 2.0hief EngineBt,|»|abanadi Goadauari, Kachhar yater Basources Departnsnti Saipur. S.si-ipsti-ntsnd.i.ng EngiBesr, y atsr RBsources Bsp artcen t;» Shiviiath rianclal»Bi-irg» 4.£xecutiue£(igineer»Vatsrl-jeseurces Qepartnent,Kauardha DiuisioFiiKauardha» Qistt- Ra.JnaBdgson. •Respondents APPLICATION UNOER SEenON 19 BF THE ADniNISTRATIUE TRI8UNAL_ACT»1985. DETAILS OF TyEAPPLieATION: , 1 •PartJLeyl ars o.f _the^_ appjL_ic an.t; 2.particylars of tbs r6sponi]8n'k_s: As aboue. &s aboua* S.Particulars of ths ordar agaiitst uhich tbs ap(3li c.atlo ll ^s Bades i)Against ttie order dt. 4.8.1995 ii)Passedl3ys RespondentNo.4 .2- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRTTPETmON(S) No. 1186 of2005 Prabhudayal. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofMadhya Pradesh & Othere. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE_ADMD>nSTRATTVE TMBUNALS ACT. 1985 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri.J, Present: Shri SanjayPatel, Advoeateforthepetitioner. Shri Y.S.Tliakur, Deputy Advocate General with Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 22"" day ofOctober, 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to tlie authorities to consider his case in accordance with fhe cireular dated 05 March, 2008 as the petitioner was appointed in the year 1990 and his services were terminated on 03 September, 1995 (Annexure A/l). However, the termination order was stayed by this Court on 16 February, 2000. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, a representation is made, the same shall be considered in accordance with law in its own merits, wifhia a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. Iti view offhe foregoing, without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe case, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty and observations. [" Satish K. Agnihotri Judge