C p.^ / o .?/. [P^E^NO.Iojt ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N^0^ /2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS /^4if> 'sy ^'As'^/ iy s A-- -<?•' / Jayant Kumar Dewangan S/o. Deep Chand Dewangan, Aged abut 31 years, Resident of Jhhagarakhand Road, Manendragarh, District-Korea (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Throygh : Secretary, Department of PancHayat Gramin Vikas Mantralaya, D.K.S. -Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) " .':' fc ?• Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District- Korea Collectrate, Baikunthpur, District- Korea (C.G.) 3, President, Zila Panchayat, District- Korea, Collectrate, Baikunthpur, Dista-ict- Korea (C.G.) 4. Anand Kumar Jaiswal S/o Sita Ram Jaiswal, Aged- Not known, Residnt of Near Bal Mandir, Baikunthpur, District- Korea (C.G.). . 5. Collector, Korea, Baikunthpur, District-Korea (C.G.). WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS/ORDERS AND DIRECTION XI-HC-78 ^SET -i<i^irt<<, UTti'M^ld, (sirtit-iy^ *ll*lt')l $F:RT^ !^.:^....S..OCl.fe. 3n^?TlRcp (ij^t^.Ei) ^2005' 3fT^?TiRTft'(i* ?raiT3iAflsOTTO y- SmiSR^fttTaiI^ST Shri Mahendra Dubev, Shri Vivek Sharmi State/respondents No. 1 and Heard on admission. • By way of this writ pet|l of the Constitution of India, selection of respondent No.' Grade III tn other backward dl It is subiuitted by learn^ the petitioner was a better However, the authorities b^ selected respondent No.4 petitioner has been refused. of the petitioner is goyerne|d Pradesh (Chhattisgarh) Karrriis(Recruitinent and Co4 He also submits fhat (here aforesaid Rules. Since fhere is a provijs; Rules and the petitioner various grounds, I deeru. it ^ avail the reniedy of appeal w| <ni<l(o<Ili *ii»fc)V^fa'<txluifsn ^arf^isiT^CT counsel for fhe petitioner. Panel Lawyer for on advaace copy. Che tion, filed under Artiele 226/227 |±LC petitioner has chaUenged fhe on the post of Shiksha Kanui lasses handicapped categoiy. ;d counsel for the petitioner that (|:aadidate thaa respondent No.4. a wrong nieans of procedure, aad the candidature of fhe IHe furfher subniits ffaat the case by fhe provisions of Madhya Panchayat Shiksha l.ditions of Services) Rules, 1997. is a provision of appeal in fhe hlas [sion of appeal in the aforesaid chaUenged fhe selection on ^roper that the petitioner should |iich in fhe opinion of this Court iiln,] Si>^r~i-',U;S-.; .i^i'.S.Si^SW.S-S/Sf^vff.ii XI-HC-78 viw\ ^|A|irt<4, UTllwid, Rrtlt-l^ *iiHrti s^n^ 3IT^?1 q'gcp ('jcrfgERE) ^200 3TI^<TcpTf^[fil? ?raT3iI^?Trt>«li<b S^TW^ifteraii^ST _ ^_ <ni<<fe<i1i *iiinV^ffe>^)'<(uf+s;l'( <1'3)^H3II^T Uli S*Au7^ is an altemative aad efilcA.cious rem.edv available to fhe [to entertain this petition at this <•• di^missed. However, it is obsei-ved ]at liberfy to file an appropriate aufhQrity and if such aa appeal shaU. be obligated to decide preferably 'wifhin a period of 3 of fhe appeal. ^Uy disposed of. i.2598/2005 stands disposed of. stage. The petition, stands di^mis; that fhe petitioner shall be appeal before fhe competent] is f0.ed, the coinpetent auth^rity the appeal as early as months froia the date The petition stands fin^ Consequently, M.W.P.] Certified copy as per ru^es. possitjle Of filin^/receipt .No Sd/- s"nil Kumar Sinh Judge a