IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 2863 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 26.08.2009 Kapoor Singh Bhankar .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) In the present petition, the petitioner, who is working as Environment Engineer in the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (respondent No.2 herein), is seeking direction to the respondents to re-fix his pay by reckoning the past service in terms of Rule 4.4 (a) of CSR Volume I, Part I and further to release all the pecuniary benefits. In the writ petition, it has been averred that the petitioner made representation for the said relief to the Chairman of the respondent No.2 Board, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-4. CWP No. 2863 of 2009 -2- In this regard, it has been stated by the respondents in their written statement that the said representation has no substance and as such, the same cannot be considered. However, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 states that the said representation made by the petitioner is still pending before the Chairman of the respondent No.2 Board and no decision has been taken on the same. He states that without being influenced by the stand taken by the respondents in their written statement, the Chairman of the respondent No.2 Board will consider the representation (Annexure P-4) and take a final decision on the same by passing a speaking order, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. In view of the said stand, taken by learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition may be disposed of accordingly. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chairman of the respondent No.2 Board to take a final decision on the representation (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law, by considering all the pleas raised by the petitioner, and pass a speaking order, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. August 26, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE