IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No.7 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 05, 2011 Rupinder Kumar Sharma ….Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others …. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. Alok Jagga, Advocate 1. To be referred to the Report or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant appeal is directed against judgment dated 14.12.2010 passed by learned single Judge. At the outset, Mr. Alok Jagga, counsel for the appellant states that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the first para of the judgment passed by the learned single Judge, inasmuch as the writ petitioner-respondent Gurpreet Kaur and Surinder Singla have been treated as part time Lecturer, whereas Surinder Singla is a regular Lecturer and writ petitioner-respondent Gurpreet Kaur is a part time Lecturers. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to seek review or rectification of the order as the error is apparent on the face of the record. The appeal is disposed of, accordingly. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S. MANN ) January 05, 2011 JUDGE satish