-78 vj-oq^|«10<<,y>-rfl<M<|<»,Rrtltiy'; *imni?SW """"""""""""""'" aii^sTira^p (^ciijisi<£i) aii^sTmf5-ii<b asfT anc!STri>«licb gTarsRnfSasii^CT W.».(81 No. 6271/2008 PETITIOMfER Navai pori, D/o Lachlum Nafh Sori, Aged about 27 ye^rs, R/o Vill^e 8s Post Chipawad Tah.- Kondajgaon, Dfetrict-Bastar (CG) Versts RBSPONDBMTS 1. The Sl 2. 3. CdUcctor, Depart^aent D.K.S.I TIie Janpa<|l Executlive Kateka|lyaa Chief Katekalh SB: H<MI. SHRI DHIRENDRAlMISHRA. J 11-11-2008 Shri Rishi Rahul SOEU, ShriArunSao, Govt. Heard. Grievaace of the petiti^ Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. conducted for recruitment of for coiuiseling on 2.7.2008. with her testimoniate. Howev cominuTucation Iroin the appointment tpiofcxTli *iiinVff (s'<l'((ui<-ci'! ^srf^Tan^CT (ate of ClLbatdsgarh, through Secretaiy, of Panchayat & Rural Development jBhawaa, Raipur (CG) Cc|Ucctor, Korba, District-Korba (CG) Panchayat Katekalyaa through: Cbief OfBcer Jaapad Panchayat, District Soufh Bastar Dautewada |Executive OflBcer Janpad Paachsyat, calfyaa, District Soufh Bastar Dantewada WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTKtLB 226 OF THB CONSTITXmON OF IHDIA ^ounsel for the pctitioner. Advocate for the State. Aflier i|)ner is tfaat she applied for the post of slie was selected in the examination Phiksha Karmis Grade-III, stie was caUcd ^he pardcipated ia the counseling aloag T, fttereafter, she has not rcceived any respondent-aufhorities regardiag her ^w-ys^ ^.^~^ iC-78 ^SET ^qRTB'RT, tj>TH<<l<l(»,R«l'My'< *lllc»l^TT^ 3II^?T<BTR-li<b ?raTalT^S1tR*lJ<» -$ 3n^?itraq)(ijciij6i^i) STaT8R^fl?T3Ilt?T -2-- appeafui! add *i' tlie Leamed counsel not pressing this petition at fhe petitipner to file repres^i redressal'ofher grievances to declde her representation Leamed counsel for fh4: files representation befcre grievances along wifh certifie^ week finm. today, the same 4 ftuther period of fhree weeks| by the respondent No.4. In view of above fhe iustant petition is representatk>n before the grievances along wifh certifie^i today. On such representat|on directed to consider ttie sam^ of fhree weeks from. the date Certified copy as per npes 4'uig for the petitioner submits that he t|us stage, however, he prays for liberty to .^ntation before fhe respondent No.4 for fhe respondeat No.4 be further directed v(?ifhin fhe speci&ed period. State subiiuts fhat ia case fhe petitioner respoDdent No.4 for rediessal of her copy ofthis order.wifhin a period ofone khaU be considered and decided withta a firum fhe datc of receipt of representation dispo^ed <P|qlCT<i1l1l*in'l'it'l^'<9 •(Rl't^l'i ?ti af^t 3IT^?I submtssions of leamed counsel for the parties, of with liberty to fhe petitioner to file |respondcnt No.4 for redressal of her copy of fhis order, wittun one week Irom being ffled, fhe respondent No. 4 is on its own laerits wifhia a furfher period (ifreccipt ofthe representation. SdA ''. Dhu-endraMishra Judge