!W! BICE^b.r ^ps^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) HO.Q^ 1200S~I- PETITIONERS ^.. A. N. V. Satyanarayan S/o Shri A. Appala Swamy Age about 37 years, Lecturer, R/o: Behind BunkarSangh, Santara Badi, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) ^. Ku. AshaTekam D/o Shri KishanTekam Age about41 years, Up. Div.Teacher, R/o : Qr. No. - 1 E, Road No. - 27, Sector - 5, Bhilai, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) ^- Smt Kavita IViishra W/o Shri Syam Ji Mishra Age about 36 years, Up. Div. Teacher, R/o : Plot No. 88, Shakti Nagar, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Smt. Padmavati Smita Rao W/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Rao Age about 36 years, Up. Div. Teacher, R/o : Plot No. C-72, Priyadarshini Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 5. KanakKumarBaghel S/o Shri Ram Prasad Baghel Age about41 years, Up. Div.Teacher, R/o : 55, Keshar Nagar, Near Gayatri School, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS > RESPONDENTS >' State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Directorof Public Instruction Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer Durg(C.G.) District Education Officer Rajnandgaon(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (3} HI6H COWT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BXLASWR W. P. fS) No. 357 of 2007 ^ Petitioners : A.N.V. Satyanarayan and o'Hwrs Versus Respondents : State Sovemment of Chhatt'isgarh ond o'thers SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J 5hri Aj/ay Shr'wastawi, Advoccrte for the petitioners. 5mt. Anju Ahuja, Dq}uty Sovemment Advocate for the respondents/State. OR & E R yassssd on 23rd Oay of January, 2007) The following order of -the Courl- is passed by Satlsh K- Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners <u8 well as leamed D^iuty ©overnmentAdvocate oppeotf-ing for the pe^»ondents/5tate jointly submit that -the facts of the present case are similar to that of in W. P. 1463 of 2006 (Aemcn Jam Vs. The Storte 6ovt. of Chhatt'isgarh & ono-ther), which was disposed of vide order ckited 10 November, 2006. They further submit that •the quastion of law involved is also the saune. 2. In view of the above stated ajbmissions made by teamed counsel for the part'ies, the writ petition is di^osed of m terms of the order datad 10th November, 2006 pcssed by this Cowt in W. P. 1463 of 2006. No order as to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnifaotri Judge