IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16558 of 2007 Kanhaiya Prasad Srivastava, Son of Late Babu Lal Prasad Verma, Resident of Village and P.O. Rukundipur, P.S. Dareunda & District - Siwan. ……………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Department of Co-operative Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, New Secretariate, Patna. 5. The Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd. through its Chairman, Biscomaun Bhawan, Patna. 6. The Managing Director, Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan, Patna. 7. The Secretary, Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan, Patna. 8. The Finance Controller, Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan, Patna. 9. The Account Officer, Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan, Patna. 10. The Special Officer (Establishment) Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd. Biscomaun Bhawan, Patna. ……….. Respondents ----------- 2 9/8/2011 Heard Mr. Abu Haider, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Nutan Sahay, learned AC to Standing Counsel No. 1, who appears on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 /State and Sri Vikash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 5 to 10 / Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Ltd. (BISCOMAUN). The present writ petition was filed by the petitioner in the year 2007 with a prayer to direct the Respondents, particularly Respondent/ ‘BISCOMAUN’, to clear all his retrial dues. The petitioner had retired with effect from 31/10/2001 as ‘Depot Manager-cum-Incharge Range Officer’, ‘BISCOMAUN’. 2 At the very outset Sri Vikash Kumar, learned counsel for Respondent / ‘BISCOMAUN’ raised an objection on the point of maintainability of the writ petition. It was submitted that since ‘BISCOMAUN’ is being run by a duly elected Managing Committee and functioning as a Co- operative Society, the ‘BISCOMAN’ is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this court. Learned counsel for the ‘BISCOMAUN’ further submits that during the pendency of the writ petition all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. In view of the fact that grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, the question raised by learned counsel for the ‘BISCOMAUN’ regarding maintainability of the writ petition has got no significance. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the statement made on behalf of the ‘BISCOMAUN’ that retrial dues of the petitioner have already been paid. In view of stand taken by the parties there is no need to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. Liberty is granted to the petitioner, that if any grievance of the petitioner as claimed in the writ petition exist, the petitioner shall be entitled to file representation before Respondent No. 6 /Managing Director, Bihar State Co- operative Marketing Union Ltd. (‘BISCOMAUN’). If such representation is filed, court expects, that Respondent No. 6, 3 will examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)