1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7611 of 2011 V.Umarani ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District Dindigul 2. The Inspector of Police Keeranur Police Station Dindigul District ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent and his subordinate to give adequate police protection for the petitioner and her family members to safeguard her lands and to take action against the accused persons in accordance with law vide representation, dated 13.6.2011. *** For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to direct the second respondent and his subordinate to give adequate police protection for the petitioner and her family members to safeguard her lands and to take action against the accused persons in accordance with law vide representation, dated 13.6.2011. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that on earlier occasion when the petitioner apprehended threat, she filed Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 9945 of 2006, for police protection and this Court has directed the respondent police to render suitable help to the petitioner if any cognizable offence is made out on the complaint given by the petitioner. He therefore, submitted that even after getting a decree, she was not allowed to enjoy the property and therefore, she has given a complaint on 08.06.2011 to the second respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 and as the second respondent has not taken any action, she has given a representation, on 13.06.2011 to the first respondent, seeking police protection. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that in the complaint, she has not given the full details. 4. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to give a detailed representation to the second respondent stating the decree obtained by her and also the nature of interference by the proposed parties and the second respondent is directed to take suitable action on the complaint if any cognizable offence is made out. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District Dindigul 2. The Inspector of Police Keeranur Police Station Dindigul District 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court Madurai vsg rl/4c – 11.7.2011 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7611 of 2011 23.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/