II yersus. Raindayal Rawat, aged 58 years, S/o. Late Shri Jugal Rawat, pennauent residence at Village Bandri, Distt. S^ar, M.P. at present at 3rd Batalion, CG Armed Force 'B' Coaipany Cauip, Police Liiie, Raipur (CG) State of Chhatdsgarh, TIu-ough Secretary ia the department of Hoiue Affairs, DKS Bhawaa, Secretariat Raipur(CG) . Shri A.K.BraIune, Coiuaadant, 3rd Battaliou, C.G. Armed F'orce, at Ainleshwar, Distt. Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOK OF INDIA 2. SIiri Bhishnia Kiuger, counsel for fhe petitioaer. Shri Pankaj Shrivasta.va, Pauel Lawyer for the State. 115.05.2009) Wifh. the consent ofthe parties, the icatter is heard - finaUy. Grievance of the petitioner is fhat vide order dated 17.4.2009 (Aanexure P/2) he has heen traasferred from Raipur to Bhadrakali, Distt. Bastar. Learaed coun^el for the petitioner contends that he inay be penuitted to withdraw the present -svrit petition with R:-?ipipr[|irjg!jg!S| '^ Eberb' to m.ake representation to the respoadent No.2. However, the said authority be directed to decide fhe representation consideruig all the grievances of the petitioaer and lurther the said representation be decided expeditiously. On fhe other haad leamed counsel for the State has no objectiou ifthe petitioner aiakes a represeutation aad he contends fh.at the sa.me would be decided expeditiously. In. fhe event of peti.tioner's niafcing fbe represeiitation within 21 days froin fhe date of receipt df this order, tiie saiae would be decided wifhia a period of three weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe said representation. !t is being made clear that this Court has not expressed aay optuion upon fhe inerifs of the case aad fhe authorities woitld be at Uberly to decide the representatiQn stnctly in accordance wifh law. With fhe above observation, the petition stands disposed of. ,— — -—^_ Sd/- .3. "•^-^ s/- pritinker Diwakar Judge