THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.13965 OF 2004 ORDER: This Writ Petition is ﬁled questioning the validity of the order dated 17.07.2004 passed in R.P.No.698 of 2004 by the Regional Joint Commissioner, Endowments Department, Multi Zone III, Hyderabad-the ﬁrst respondent herein. The seventh respondent herein ﬁled O.A.No.45 of 2003 before the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal-the second respondent herein, under Section 87 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 {“the Act” for brevity}, to declare that the Medicare Educational Trust, Warangal, is not a charitable institution or endowment and that the institution is a private Trust. In the aforesaid O.A., respondents 5 and 6 herein have ﬁled I.A.No.2 of 2004 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Section 87 (4) of the Act for grant of injunction against the respondents therein. The second respondent herein has passed orders in I.A.No.2 of 2004 granting injunction restraining respondents therein in interfering with the management of Medicare Educational Trust, Warangal. Against the said I.A., the petitioners herein have ﬁled R.P.No.698 of 2004 before the ﬁrst respondent-the revisional authority. The revisional authority, by the order dated 17.07.2004, remanded the matter to the second respondent herein to hear and dispose of the matter after giving opportunity to all the parties. Further directions were also issued to the parties not to change the nature of the Trust and its properties and not to act against the basic aims and objects of the Trust. Questioning the aforesaid orders of the revisional authority, this Writ Petition is ﬁled in the year 2004. On 10.08.2004, while issuing notice before admission, this Court granted interim stay of all further proceedings in I.A.No.2 of 2004 and O.A.No.45 of 2003 on the ﬁle of the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Warangal. The said order passed by this Court continued all along and is in force since then. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted that O.A.No.45 of 2003 is transferred to the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad, i.e., the third respondent herein and is still pending consideration. Though the order of the revisional authority is questioned in various grounds, it is to be noted that R.P.No.698 of 2004 itself is against the interlocutory order passed by the second respondent herein in I.A.No.2 of 2004 in O.A.No.45 of 2003 pending disposal of the main O.A. As it is now stated that O.A.No.45 of 2003 is also pending consideration and that the interim order passed by this Court on 10.08.2004 is in force all along, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to dispose of O.A.No.45 of 2003, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three {3} months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, there shall be a direction to the respondents that the order passed by this Court on 10.08.2004 in this Writ Petition shall continue to operate till appropriate orders are passed in O.A.No.45 of 2003. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY, J) 8th December 2011 RRB