1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6299 of 2011 Decided on: 8.8.2011 Kameshwari Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Gurdev Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued by directing the respondents to re-enage the services of the petitioner on the same post/duties, which she was performing before her oral termination. (ii) That extra wages @ Rs. 750/- per month @ Rs. 1/- per teacher/staff for the preparation of 10 kg rice/dal for the 31 teachers/staff of GSSS Kothi Gehri may also be 2 ordered to be paid from their own pockets with effect from August, 2009 onwards. (iii) That the cost of 10 Kg rice/dal may be ordered to be collected from the pocket of the teachers/staff and deposited in government treasury from August, 2009 onwards continuously. (iv) That the respondents may very kindly be directed to produce the entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.” 2. In the nature of this order, we propose to pass, we do not think it necessary to issue notice to respondents No. 4 & 5 and have the matter decided by this Court at this stage. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the dispute, if any, can be otherwise sorted out by the Deputy Director (Elementary) Education, Mandi. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of as follows. 4. In the event of the petitioner approaching the Deputy Director (Elementary) Education, Mandi, by way of an appropriate representation, after serving a copy of the same on respondents No. 3, 4 & 5, within one month from today, the matter shall be looked into by the said Deputy Director, with notice to the petitioner and also to respondents No. 3, 4 & 5 and appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law shall be taken, within another four months. 3 5. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 8, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja) (hl/jai) Judge.