IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 4536 of 2011 Date of decision: 15.06.2011 Asha Rani. ...Petitioner. Versus. State of H.P. & others. ...Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,J. ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. N.S. Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by transfer orders dated 19.04.2011 and 29.04.2011. In the nature of the order we propose to pass in this case, it is not necessary for us to go into the merits of the case. We find that the matter is engaging attention of the second respondent at the instance of the third respondent. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to second respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner also while taking a decision on the representation filed by the third respondent with regard to his transfer. In case the petitioner has not been relieved as on today and in case substitute has not joined duty, further proceedings in that regard will be deferred till the decision is taken as above. In case substitute has already joined duty, the petitioner may not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open to her to avail leave of the kind due till orders are passed by the second respondent, as above. ...2... 2. The writ petition is disposed of so also the pending application(s), if any. 3. Copy dasti immediately to the petitioner, who will produce the copy of the petition alongwith copy of this judgment before the second respondent. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge 15th June, 2011 (jai/virender)