.->(. C-^i^Q^-—-" ^_ in the Honble Hicih Court ofChhattishciarh at Bilaspur(C.G.) W.P. (S) No. "74'2/Z- 200g, "SINGIE HFMPi ^afc>a» Sjf^a^s ^y.^ ^^ •^" Petitioner .................^Dhani Ram Rawte ..'' ^ Aged 42 years '^..•••"'^'' .S/0 Shri Beer Singh Rawte, , ••' Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primery School, Chikhalakasa, Choorya District, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^s ,•••"<-• \^"> VERSUS -I.The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2, ThdMstt.Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G) Writ petition under articies 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAIVIUS, Certiorari, Prohibition and other suitable WRTT or writs, Order or orders, Direction or directions. ^:. XI-HC-78 sn^T^iri^ire asir an^?T!*i*i opal ^si -qwicyi, ajn'M'is, Ridiuy HIHWt ShHlch ^vi'Wvfg, ani'M'is, c^,.(S^) ^^_1^/ € ^200 3ll^l 4ach ('ic<t^°iq.l<") ??(nwgf?(T3Ti^T 5-1 -2007 IWr. Rakesh Pandey, Mr. Mr. Somkant Verma, courfsei Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govf Government Advocate, it Advocate, Ms. Sunita Jai(i Panel Lawyer for the Stat^/respondents. »- 'shl<ll<l41'l 111fi'l"fftSIfl'<R]t<;K ^iarf^irsn^FT A.V.Shridhar, Mr. Ajay Shrivastava and for the petitioner(3). irnment Advocate, Mr. Sushil Dubey, ulrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government i, Panel Lawyer and Mr. Arvind Dubey, 'd counsel appearing for tha parties, the ed of. i Writ Petition (S.) No.7367 of 2006 in With the consent of learn^ matter is heard finally and dispo^i Common order dictated it open Court, passed ssparatsly. A copy of this order be pi^ced on ths record of the connected writ. petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Ag"ib°m Judge P.T.O. ^ 0\v ^r H!GH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR SINGL6BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PET1T10N IS.) N0.73S7 OF 200S Petitioner Samay La' Kripai versys Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WR1T PETITiON (S.) N0,7403 0= 2006 Petitioner Bholanath Sahu versus ResRondents State of C.G. and others WRIT PETST10N (S.) N0.7398 OF 2006 Petitioner Santosh Kumar Sahu versus Rsspondents Stats of C.G. and others WRST PETSTION {8.1 N0.7395 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt. Chandana Pal Versys Respondents State of C.Q. and others ^^. WRiT PETITION ?S.) N0.7405 OF 2006 Petitioner Ramadhin Sahu versus Respondents State Govt. of ChhatSisgarh and others WRIT PETITSON (S.) N0.7505 OF 2008 Petitionsr Bhawar Lai Dewangan versus ResDondents The State Governmentof Chhattisgarh and another 'S&RIT PETSTION (S.i N0.7407 OF 2006 Petitioner Ram Narayan Tiwari versus ResRondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another v' WR1T PETITSON (S.) N0.7408 OF 2006 Petitioner Sant Kumar Tandan versus Respondents Stete Go'A. of Chhattisgarh and others /c2 Petitioner WRIT PETIT10N (S.) N0.7409 OF 2006 Nand Kumar Verma Vereys Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents WRiT PETITION (S.) N0.7410 OF 2006 Basant Kumar Vaishnav versus The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITSON !S.) N0.7411 OF 200S Petitipjier Respondents Kanhaiya Das Sahu versus The State Governmsnt of Chhattisgarh and another WR!T PETITION (S.) N0.7412 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versys Sunahere Das Sahu The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another ^- WRIT PETiTION (S.l N0.7413 OF 200S Petitioner Menu Ram Ganware yersus Respondente The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another \^ r WRIT PET1TION (S.) N0.7414 OF 2006 Petitioner Shankar Lal Chandrkar yersus Respondepts The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETIT10N (S.) N0.7415 OF 2003 Petitioner Lakhan Lal Aahir versus Respond_ente The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETiTiON (S.) N0.7416 OF 2006 PetifieRer Kanhaiya La! Sahu versus Resoondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.} N0.7417 OF 2006 Petitioner Shube Das Ratre versus Respondents The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another '\ i^ WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7418 OF 2006 Pstlfioner Dixit Kumar Sahu versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITiON (S.l N0.7419 OF 2006 Petitioner Annoo Ram Deohare versus Respondents' The Stats Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRfT PETiTION (S.) N0.7420 OF 2006 Petitioner Ajit Ram Kuthariya versus ResBondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another -— WR!T PETIT10N (S.) N0.7421 OF 2006 Petitioner Virendra Kumar Gatre versus Respondents The State Govsrnment of Chhattisgarh and another ':1 ^. WR!T PETITSON (S.l N0.7422 OF 200S Pstitioner Dhani Ram Rawte versus RespQndents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WR1T PET1T10N (S.) N0.7423 OF 2005 Petitioner Bhagirathi Bharti versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgaiti and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7424 OF 2005 PetjtLojTer Makhan La! Sonkar versus Respo.ndents The State Government of Chhattisgarh andanother (^ WR!T PETITION (S.5 N0.7425 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents yersus Gowardhan Singh Urwasa The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another Y v Present : Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Mr. A.V.Shridhar, Mr. Aj'ay Shrivastava and Mr. Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner(3). Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate, Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocats, Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer and Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panei Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER :th (Passed on 5"' Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing Tor the parties jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present batoh of writ -^ petitions are squarely covsred by the decision of this Court in the cass of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Corporatton, Durg ancS another . 2. !n subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. Tha State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by th'ss Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretaiy, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarffied that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are a!so covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh andanothes) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the wrlt petitions are disposed of in tsrms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid hvo advance increments or not. No ordsr as to costs. ^•- 4. A copy of this Order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. —--—-- „ Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (il) MPJR-CG 96 Gopa!