IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 19176 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.11.2011 Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL) ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. P.K.Mutneja, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. R.D.Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate, for respondents No. 8 to 16. **** SURYA KANT, J.(Oral) It is stated by learned State Counsel and is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner that settlement between the parties has taken place and the routine work has been resumed in the company. This Court expects that both the parties shall honour and abide by the terms and conditions of settlement and restore peace and harmony in the industry. The petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. 29.11.2011 (SURYA KANT) 'ravinder' JUDGE