THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO : 24573 of 2010 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Assailing the order of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad passed in O.A. No.9743 of 2009, dated 14.9.2009, the department filed the present writ petition. The facts in brief are that the 1st respondent herein filed O.A. No. 9743 of 2009 before the Tribunal seeking to call for the records relating to the proceedings Rc. No. 2020/A3/09-3, dated 25.7.2009 of the District Educational Officer, Ranga Reddy District and to quash the same. She also sought for a consequential direction to declare that the applicant is entitled to be continued as School Assistant (Maths) in terms of promotion orders in Proc. Rc. No.2020/A3/09, dated 31.1.2009 of the District Educational Officer with all consequential benefits. The Tribunal, by the order impugned in this writ petition, while admitting the O.A. has granted interim suspension of the proceedings bearing Rc.No. 2020/A3/2009-3. Aggrieved by the said order, the department filed the present writ petition. Admittedly, the impugned order was passed by the Tribunal in the year 2009 and the department filed the present writ petition nearly after a period of one year. If really, the department is aggrieved by the interim order passed by the Tribunal, it ought to have filed a vacate petition before the Tribunal seeking vacation of the said interim order. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. At this stage, learned Special Government Pleader representing the learned Addl. Advocate General has submitted that the department has already filed a vacate petition before the Tribunal and the same is pending. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, it would suffice if a direction is issued to the Tribunal to dispose of the vacate petition. Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the Tribunal to dispose of the vacate petition, if any, filed by the department in the aforementioned O.A., as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J DATE: 6th October, 2010 _________________ G.V. SEETHAPATHY pnb