IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 320 of 2010() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1793/2010 DATED 01/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC: --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.UNISON INTERNATIONAL REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR JOSE P MATHEW G.V. IYER ROAD, WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN-682 003 2. M/S.PARKSON ESTATES & INDUSTRIES. REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR JOSE P.MATHEW G.V. IYER ROAD, WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN-682 003 3. VARGHESE P.MATHEW, W/O.P.O.VARKEY, PARATHUKATTIL HOUSE, CHERUPARAMBATH ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN-682003. 4. SMT.NEENA ELEZABETH VARGHESE, W/O.VARGHESE P.MATHEW, PARATHUKATTIL HOUSE, CHERUPARAMBATH ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN-682 003. 5. JOSE P.MATHEW, S/O.P.V.MATHEW, PARATHUKATTIL HOUSE, CHERUPARAMBATH ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN – 682 003. BY ADV. MR.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC: ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE SENIOR MANAGER, UCO BANK, P.B.NO.63, FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, (ZONAL HEAD) ZONAL OFFICE, UCO BANK, OVERBRIDGE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R.P.NO.320/2010 3. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, UNDER SARFAESI ACT, UCO BANK, P.B.NO.43., FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CHIEF MANAGER, ASSET MANAGEMENT BRANCH, UCO BANK, AMBAT BUILDINGS, 1ST FLOOR, 218, PATHERI ROAD, ANNASALI, CHENNAI-600 006. BY ADV. MR.GEORGE KARITHANAM VARGHESE, SC. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- R.P No.320 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010. O R D E R The learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the only relief pressed before this Court is to re-schedule the liability fixed upon the petitioner to satisfy the due amount by way of 'six' equal monthly instalments so as to commence from '30.4.2010' instead of '30.3.2010' and to continue the payments accordingly. The learned counsel further submits that the amount due on 30.3.2010 will also be satisfied along with the instalment payable in the month of April and that no further enlargement of time will be sought for. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Bank as well. 3. Considering the limited relief prayed for and the modification required, the review petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to effect the instalment due in respect of the month of March 2010 to be satisfied along with the instalment to be paid on or before 30.4.2010. It is made clear that, but for the above, no modification is made with regard to the judgment already passed by this Court. The Review Petition is disposed of. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge ab