IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1 OF 2006. NO. 1 OF 2006. NO. 1 OF 2006. Kerman Barjor Bodhanwala. ... Plaintiff No.1. V/s. Farida Kerman Bodhanwala. ... Plaintiff No.2. Mr.Zubin D. Sahukar for both the plaintiffs. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 23rd January 2006. 23rd January 2006. 23rd January 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The plaiantiff Nos.1 and 2 have presented this petition/suit for divorce with mutual consent. Both of them are represented by common Advocate Mr.Z.B.Sahukar. The consent terms incorporated at Exh.‘B’ were read over to plaintiff Nos.1 and 2, who are personally present before the Court. Both of them admit contents thereof. In para-5 of the petition/suit, both parties have admitted that they are staying separately since February, 2004. Both the plaintiffs have filed affidavits in support of the petition/suit for divorce by mutual consent. The same are taken on record. 2. Both, plaintiff Nos.1 and 2, agree that the consent terms on which they are seeking divorce by mutual consent have been settled by them after negotiation and are acceptable to them. I am satisfied that the consents terms are reasonable and can be accepted. 3. In the above view of the matter, following order: O R D E R . The marriage of plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 stands dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual consent on the terms and conditions set out in Exh‘B’ forming part and parcel of the petition/suit. . Petition/suit stands disposed accordingly in terms of this order with no order as to costs. . Decree be drawn accordingly. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)