1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2362 OF 2007 Niphad Taluka Education Society. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Deputy Director of Education Nasik Division, Nashik, & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.A.V.Anturkar with S.B.Deshmukh, for Petitioner. Mr.V.P.Malvankar, AGP for Respondents 1 & 2. Mr.Anilkumar Patil, for Respondent no.3. AND WRIT PETITION NO.7096 OF 2006 Shri.Sahebrao Bhila Shirole. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Deputy Director of Education Nasik Region, Nashik, & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Anilkumar Patil, for Petitioner. Mr.A.V.Anturkar with S.B.Deshmukh, for Respondent 3. Mr.V.P.Malvankar, AGP for Respondents 1,2 & 5. 2 CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 29th NOVEMBER,2007. P.C.:- 1. Though writ petition no. 7096 of 2006 is not on board for final hearing, by consent of parties it is taken up for final hearing. Both these petitions are taken up for final hearing by consent of parties. 2. By consent of parties order dated 11.8.2006, a copy of which is at Annexure A5 to Writ Petition no.2362 of 2007 and the order dated 15.11.2006, a copy of which is at Annexure A11 to Writ petition no.2362 of 2007 passed by the respondent no.1 are set aside. 3 3. The matter is remitted back to respondent no.1 for denovo hearing and decision in accordance with law. All the contentions available to both the sides are kept open to be raised before the respondent no.1 and for its decision in accordance with law. 4. The respondent no.1 to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law as directed above as expeditiously as possible within a period of six months from today. Both the petitions are disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.) ---