IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35533 of 2009 1. AMIT KUMAR S/O SURAJ YADAV R/O LALDARWAZA, P.S.- KOTWALI, DISTT.- MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 06-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner was taken in custody on 13.05.2009 in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 121 of 2009 which was registered under sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Penal Code. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has not been named in the F.I.R. During the course of investigation the material which has come against him is that he along with other accused had gone and threatened the informant that the name of Rahul Yadav and Rabi Yadav should not be merged in the said case, otherwise they will be suitably dealt with. According to the petitioner that does show that the petitioner was not involved in the actual murder of the deceased but he may be trying to put pressure for diverting the institution of the case intimidating the informant. That being so, there is no evidence indicating the petitioner in the murder. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of - 2 - Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Moffasil P.S. Case No. 121 of 2009. One of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner on due identification. The petitioner will appear in the court below on each and every date and shall cooperate in the trial. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) BTiwary/