IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41995 of 2010 RAM ASRE PASWAN @ RAMASHISH PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 502 and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that he has not been named by the original informant. The petitioner appears to have been named by an injured witness. That puts him at par with the named accused in so far as the jurisdiction for anticipatory bail is concerned. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner has to be dealt with in accordance with law keeping in mind any orders that may have been passed on the regular bail application of other named accused. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)