IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 144 of 2008. Decided on: 04.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Purnima Dehloo. … Petitioner. Versus Nand Lal Thakur. … Respondent/Contemnor. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate. For the Respondent/ Contemnor : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It has come in the reply filed by the respondent that the petitioner has been re-engaged with effect from 5th September, 2001. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 04, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?