IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 550 of 2008. Date of Decision: 26th March, 2009. Sanjeev Kumar ....Petitioner through Mr. P.S.Khurana, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ..Respondents through Mr. N.S.Panwar, Addl.AG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner is a Document Writer at Ludhiana. He was allotted Booth Site No. 44 in Judicial Court Complex at Ludhiana. The petitioner constructed a Booth thereupon. However, soon thereafter, i.e., within two months, the allotment has been cancelled without assigning any reason. Aggrieved, he has approached this Court. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, counter-affidavit has been filed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana stating that since the petitioner failed to occupy the booth, that the allotment was cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim stay was granted by this Court, he has already shifted to the booth and is working as a Document Writer from the allotted Site only. In support of his plea, he relies upon the electricity and telephone connections. Having heard learned counsel for the parties for some time, I am satisfied that there was no valid ground to cancel the petitioner's allotment. In any case, since he has now shifted to allotted site and is running his business as a Document Writer there from, the very cause of the impugned cancellation order does not sustain. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and the impugned order is hereby quashed. Disposed of. March 26, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE