:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1144 OF 2007 (FOR BAIL) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2007 Yogesh Baburao Patne ..Applicant (Orig.Accused no.3) Versus State of Maharashtra and anr. ....Respondent (Orig.Complainant) Vikas Shivalkar Adv. for the applicant Mr.A.S.Shitole Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 10th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. From the judgment and order of the lower appellate court, it appers that the incident took place on 22.8.2004, the applicant was arrestead on 22.9.2005 and the impugned jdugment has beena delivered on 17.4.2007. The Learned judge has stated clearly that the accused are in jail for two and half years following the :2: :2: :2: incident. In such circumstances, and when the punishment imposed is of three yeras, it would be appropriate, just and fair to enlarge the applicant on bail. The facts which are set out in the application are not disputed by the prosecution. The applicant accused has agreed to abide by such terms and conditions as are imposed by this court. The following order would therefore meet the ends of justice :- O R D E R . The Applicant Accused no.3 arrested in conneciton with Sessions Case No. 454 of 2004 arising out of C.R.No. 285 of 2004 shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.5000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. The applicant shall not enter the limits of Yerwada Police Station, save and except, for reporting at the said police station twice a month. Any breach of these conditons would entail in the bail being cancelled. The application disposed off accordingly. sd/- :3: :3: :3: -------