IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40691 of 2009 MAHBOOB ALAM & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.1.2010 Heard. It is true that there are certain genuine specific allegations against the petitioners who are elder brother, like petitioner no.1, and younger brothers of the husband accused Mahfooz Alam but one cannot deny the statements made in paragraph 3 of the complaint petition that if at all there was any occurrence or incident that had taken place five years prior to the filing of the complaint petition. The contention is that for such a long period the lady remained tight lipped and did not lodge a report. The contention further is that the three petitioners who are brothers of the husband are separate from him and have nothing to do with the affairs. Regard being had to the facts and contentions, let the petitioners Mahboob Alam, Mukhtar Alam and Md. Maqbool Alam be admitted to bail, either in the event of 2 their arrest by the police or surrender before the court below, on furnishing bonds each of Rs. 5,000/-( five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Complaint Case No.1427 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)