W HIGH C(EUR‘T (3F Ci-IHAT‘TiSGARi-i. 3££ASP§R WE, {S} mo. 7a04i20m PETiTEGi§ERS 1. Palu Ram FIadhaL aged about 41 ysm‘s, Teachsr, s] 0 Shri Sawan R3111, Tribal Welfam, Primaly School, Khursaguda (Bachchanrav) Distt. Ja3hp'ur (C. G}. 2g Dubraj Ram Yadav, aged- about 40 \ years, Teacher, s/o Duryodhan Ram Yadav, Tn‘bal Welfare, Prim any School Danderahi, Di$tt. Jashpur (ca Versus RESPOMEE§TS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thmugh: The Secretam, Tribal Welfare Department & Educatioaa Deeaytment, D . K. S. Bhawan, aipm‘(C,G.). Z. Asst‘Commissioner, ‘T‘Iibal Welfare Depm‘tment, Jashpur, Distt. Jaehpur (CG). 3. Black Educatien OiEicer, Bagicha, Diem Jae‘hyur (C.G‘} WRi'’i‘ PETITIGN UNBER ARTECLE 226 {)F THE CONSTITUTIGEE OF INBIA Appeaxance: Shri‘ Ajay Shm'vastava with ~Sh1i Akshay Yadav, Counsel for the petitioners. Slu‘i Pradeep Singh, Pemel Lawyer for the State] respondents 0:1 advance copy. omL meme (23.11.2007; $‘U3VEL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard 011 acimieeiom. Learned counsel for the peiitioners submits that the petitioners have passed D.Ed., examination on their own expeoses, therefore, they are entitled To receive two advallce increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 &. 01.3. 1999. He also submits tha’r in many idemical matters, the petitions have been allowed 111 temls of the order passed 111 the case "of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Muaicipai ~ Coryorafion, 9mg amt weather (“2006 {I}? imam-CG §6j. He W G7 .P(s! No.7ij'G4/26 submits that tha cast: of the petitionsrs is s the said decision. quarély covered by This legal position is 110$ disputed by However, he submits that the orcier may be passed in tennS of ’{he said judgment, but ii shall’ b The State. learned counse1 for veriiieafion regarding petitioners’ such qualificatiox e subject to Accordingly, this wzjt petition is aliowed in terms of the passed in case of Yashwant Kum'ar’ Munfcz'pai (3oiporatz‘on,., order Bhardwaj Vs. Durg and another {supra} subject to ven’iication of the facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired D.Ed.., Examination C:ertificate on the}? own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 65 01.3.1999 arld further whether they have beeo paid two advemce increments or not This petition stands tinaliy disposed of at the motion stage itself. No order as to costs. 5 Sci/— i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge