IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.131 of 2010 Bibi Nazmun Nisha Versus Bibi Fatma Khatoon & Ors. ----------- 4 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the Bank. Mr. Dhrub Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this application the daughter of the petitioner has started receiving 50% of family pension, however, the amount lying in the pension account of the deceased employee has not been paid by the Bank as yet either to the legal heirs/nominee. Mr. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the Bank submits that the payment of the aforesaid amount as alleged by the petitioner has nothing to do with this order under review. In view of the submissions of the counsel for the Bank, Mr. Dhrub Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner proposes to approach the Bank and file an appropriate application for receiving the amount lying in the pension account of the deceased employee being his nominee. In this view of the matter, in case petitioner approaches the Bank by filing an appropriate application with all requisite documents along with the certified copy of the present order, the opposite party Bank shall consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the extant rules/instructions of the Bank expeditiously preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such application and the amount payable may also be paid. The above review application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)