IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17817 of 2008 BALI YADAV & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 04.07.08. This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 50 of 2006 for offence under Sections 302/34 I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that no witness supported the case of prosecution and police submitted final form in this case. Learned A.P.P. referred the order of the lower court and contended that cognizance has already been taken. There is clear allegation in the F.I.R. that all the petitioners made indiscriminate firing and one person died on account of firing. Hence it is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. In view of the above submissions and nature of the allegations, I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. They may surrender in the court below and seek regular bail. In that event, learned Judicial Magistrate, shall dispose of their regular bail application without being prejudiced by this order. M. Pal. (Rekha Kumari, J)