CWP No. 337/2008 11.3.2008: Present: Ms. Bhawana Dutta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma Advocate Generals for respondent No.1. Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.2. After going through the facts of the case, we are of the view that the dispute between the parties falls squarely within the realm of contract. Admittedly the petitioner submitted tender for supply of mustard oil. According to the respondents this tender was accepted on 18th February, 2008. The case of the petitioner is that the tender was not accepted and the offer made by it was withdrawn by it on 21st February, 2008. This submission is denied by the respondents. It is clear that there are disputed questions of fact involved in the petition. Since there are disputed questions of fact involved as the dispute is a contractual dispute, we are of the opinion that it would not be appropriate to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is rejected in limine. Needless to say that the parties shall be at liberty to get their grievances redressed before an appropriate court/forum. CMP No. 439/2008 Infructuous. (Deepak Gupta), J. March 11, 2008 (KA) (Rajiv Sharma ), J.