IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2057 of 2011() ----------------------------------- MC.246/2009 of THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. .................... PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------- MAHESH,S/O.RAVEENDRANATH,KADAKKALAKATH HOUSE,NORTH BEACH ROAD PO, NADAKKAVU,KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.PRASANTH M.P RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & STATE --------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHINY,D/O.KARIMBACHANVEETTIL SHANMUGAN,ERATTUPUZHA DESOM,KADAPPRAM AMSOM 680514,CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 680514 2. KRISHNA MAHESH(MINOR),REP.BY HIS GUARDIAN,IST RESPONDENT. 3. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SATHEESA BABU R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.B.VINOD THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss CRMC. NO.2057/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANENXURES AI:- COPY OF THE SALARY CERTIFICATE DTD. 3.3.2010 ISSUED FROM THE CARMEL CONVENT HIGH SCHOOL. AII:- COPY OF THE RELIEVING LETTER DTD. 21.3.2009 ISSUED BY ST.JOSEPH'S PRE- UNIVERSITY COLLEGE BANGULLURU. AIII:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 13.1.2011 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR IN MP. 2173/2010 IN MC. 246/2009. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL :- TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE tss B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.2057 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner is the respondent in Crl.M.P. No. 2173 of 2010 in M.C No. 246 of 2009 on the file of the Family Court, Thrissur. The learned counsel for the petitioner strenuously argues that the maintenance awarded is excessive and is not in consonance with the earnings of the petitioner. The specific case of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 is a software engineer. These aspects has not been taken into consideration. If the petitioner leads evidence and proves the facts alleged in this application before the trial court, the trial court shall take into consideration these aspects and pass final orders. This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv