:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.561 OF 2000 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.561 OF 2000 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.561 OF 2000 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3218 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO.3218 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO.3218 OF 2004 The Ganesh Bank of Kurundwad ..Plaintiff. Vs. Vithal Nagu Chiplunkar & Ors. ..Defendants. Mr.P.M.Arjunwadkar i/b.Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 13TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED : 13TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED : 13TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : This is a usual bank suit to recover the loan advanced by the Plaintiff to Defendant No.1. Defendant Nos.1 and 2 are the guarantors. 2. Defendant No.1 had executed various usual documents including a demand promissory note. Defendant No.1 has also issued a balance confirmation letter acknowledging the liability. Even in the correspondence the Defendants have only requested the Plaintiff to take a sympathetic view. 4. There is no affidavit in reply. No appearance has been filed. There is no defence to the suit. However, interest has been wrongly calculated at 24% :2: per annum. 5. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgment is made absolute and the suit is decreed in the sum of Rs.1,92,000/- together with interest thereon at 21% per annum from 24.4.1998 till payment and/or realisation. Refund as per rules.