ma m (W) m mqil$ .C wmggg N \9 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India 3.3. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra 19. 11.2008 M1". Somkant Verma; (20111561 for the getitioner. Mr. PK. Bhaduri, PL for By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has claimed that he is also entitled for two additional mcremenis from the cimular of the State Govt. ahd Mishra. J. the State/ respondents. dats of passing of B.T.I. examination, as per in accordance with law laid down in the énéwm amanewm mm ' “%1 anw mmewm a‘»W anew ?ETITIGNER Lal Say Nikunj Age about 44 year, Astt; Teacher Slo Siari Vir Say Nikunj, Govt. MidcHe Sehooi Jamralgi {B} Block Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashpur {CG} Vereus RESPONDENilE 1. Sfate Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Tribal éa Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Distt. Raipur. 2. Distt. Eiueation Oiiicer, Jashpur, Distt Jashpur {CG} 3. Block Education omcer, Patthalgaon Distt, Jashpur (CG} 4. Treasury, Accounts 65 Pension, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpw‘(CG) m mqi$ ....é4/VZ”CJ) é izi%;"u ¥F1200% mm 111%?! anésr $ mm'a'wm $Wané31 matter of Yashwant Kumax Eurg & Ant. mpor’ted 1'11 2006 Learned counsel for 1 he petitioner submits that he is not pressnig this petition at this stage. However, he prays that the o make a detailed representation before :spondents'regarding entitiernent of the : same may be directed to be decided 70y iitiously, in the tight of law laid down in r Bharadwaj (supra). petitioxmr may be permittad 1 competent authority of the n additional increments and :11: the competent authority expe< the matter of .Yashwani Kuma On the other hand, 1 ohjection ifthis petition is dist In View of above submis is disposed of with liberty representation before the co raising a1} his grievances representation being made, competent authority, keeping i Yashwam Kumar Bharadwaj f: Bhaxadwai Vs. Municipal Comoration, 111‘} MPJR-CG §6. earned counsel for the State has no )osed ofwith the aforesaid direction. ,sions of the parties, the instant petition to the petitioner to make a detailed mpetent authority of the respondents, raised in this petition. On such the same shail he decided by the n View the law laid down in the matter of supra} , expeditiously. /,,—«. M Sdl— Dhirendra Mishra Judge ante toms (W)