IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2008 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 3262 of 2006(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUNIL.P. PUTHEN VEEDU, IRINGAPURAM PO, PUTHENPALLI VIA, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI 110 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.BABY THOMAS, CGC FOR R2 ALEXNDER THOMAS SC FOR PSC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/12/2008, THE COURT ON 19/12/2008 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 3262/2006 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of December, 2008. JUDGMENT The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P12 to the extent the ranked list excludes the petitioner and Ext.P13 is the rejection memo of his candidature. The reason for such rejection is that the SLET, that the Petitioner has passed from the Bharadhidarsan University is not recognized in terms of the Special Rules. This very issue has already been decided by a Division Bench of this court in the judgment in WA.No.2822/07. In view of this binding judgment, the contention raised by the Petitioner are only to be rejected and I do so. Writ petition therefore fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/