IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39566 of 2010 1. HARIKANT KUMAR @ HARIKANT SINGH 2. RAHUL KUMAR @ RAHUL SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Petitioner no.1 is assailant by means of Danda. Petitioner no.2 is alleged for firing the shot injuring nephew of the informant and both are observed simple. One of the injuries is lacerated on chest, so its opinion regarding caused by hard and blunt substance like lathi or danda may not be accepted. This injury is also simple can well be taken into consideration in regular side only. Accordingly, petitioner no.2’s prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, petitioner no.2 is at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order. So far as prayer of petitioner no.1 is concerned, he is allowed anticipatory bail. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner no.1 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity, Patna in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case No.40 of 2010, G.R.No.596 of 2010, subject to 2 the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)