IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29846 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHANU HASSAN, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, STUDENT, BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. VISHNU N., S/O.BALACHANDRAN PILLAI N., STUDENT, BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. SINIJITH K.P., S/O.UNNIKRISHNAN K.P., AGED 24 YEARS, STUDENT, BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY,GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. SALEEM CHELATHADAN, S/O.MUHAMMED, AGED 24 YEARS, STUDENT, BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY,GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. CHETHANA JANARDHANAN, D/O.G.K.JANARDHANAN, STUDENT,BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY,GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. DIVYA C.C., D/O.C.M.CHANDRAN, AGED 24 YEARS, STUDENT,BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 7. HRIDYA S., D/O.B.V.SACHINDRAN, AGED 24 YEARS, STUDENT,BACHELOR OF AYURVEDIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN WP(C).No. 29846 of 2011 -2- RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KANNUR UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR, PIN-670 001. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, MANGATTUPARAMBA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670001. 3. PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA, PARIYARAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670003. ADV. SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29846 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 3-11-2011 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P1(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 3- 11-2011 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 2-11-2011 OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 2- 11-2011 OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 2-11-2011 OF THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 2- 11-2011 OF THE 3RD PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 3-11-2011 OF THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 3- 11-2011 OF THE 4TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 2-11-2011 OF THE 5TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 2- 11-2011 OF THE 5TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 2-11-2011 OF THE 6TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 2- 11-2011 OF THE 6TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 31-10-2011 OF THE 7TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P7(A): TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FOIL OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 31-10-2011 OF THE 7TH PETITIONER. /true copy/ P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29846/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers of Final year “Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicines and Surgery” Course, and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs