[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2007. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2007. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2007. Nandkumar Raghunath Kamekar ..Petitioner V/s Shamal Nandkumar Kamerkar & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. A.S. Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Y.S.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007. DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007. DATE : 5TH APRIL, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment passed by the J.M.F.C. Deorukh and Sessions Court, Ratnagiri. The learned Magistrate granted maintenance to the wife-respondent No.1 at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month and two minor children, who are respondent Nos.2 and 3 at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per month. The revision application filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed by the Sessions Court. Both the Courts below rejected the plea of the petitioner that because of he demolition of his Pan Shop by the Municipal Conuncil, he has no income and he is unable to provide maintenance. The Courts below noted that in spite of demolition the [2] present petitioner, the petitioner admitting in his evidence that his family is dependent on his earnings. The demolition of the pan shop may be a temporary feature and because of that the maintenance cannot be refused to the respondents. After hearing the learned Counsel, I find that there is no sustenance in the present petition and I do not find that the orders passed by the Courts below are per se wrong, illegal or perverse. The petition stands dismissed summarily. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.)