^l,..-1'" iS^ ...^ c ac 1c 3 *- »m , (. ^ ^••:-'^:^f:^ p' THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.^^4-/ 2005 Petitioner / Bolwa Ram Bhagat, S/o Shri Budhram, Aged about 57 years, R/o Chaal Road, Bore, PO: Gharghora,District- Raigarh(CG) <? Versus Resoondents / y»'&a'.&.-•• l^l eT...' ,a5 ^••^^ ^s^^ 1) State of Chhattisgarh - Through the S'ecretary, Tribal Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^w^m -c-.*-^ The Treasury Officer, Treasury Office, Jashpur Nagar, District - Jashpur (CG), ^3) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Collectorate, Jashpur, District Jashpur (CG). /4) Block Education Officer, Block Education Office, Jashpur Nagar, District - Jashpur (CG) •^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ..^.i^.L..:-.^ /^~~\ i^^ ^~/ mOH COURT OF CaiHATnSGARH AT BILA8PUR WRTT PETmON No. 5524 of2005 PETmONER : Bolwa Ram Bhagat. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Olhers. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenlhotri. J. "K"' Present: Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel lawyer fortiie State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 25ul(3ay of March, 2010) 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks payment ofsubsistence allowance from 01.01.1998 til) the date ofpayment ofrevised pay scaie ofRs. 2550-55-266-60-3200/- for the period Ihe petitioner retmined on suspensioii. 2. It is brought to fhe notice ofthis Court by leamed counsel appearu^ fw the State/respondents that subsequently, the petitioner has been terminated ftom service on 17.02.2006 (Annexure R/4), thus, this prayer does not survive as all the orders would be passed in the li^rt of subsequent temMnation passed by the authorities. 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is disposed ofreserving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to fhe authorities for the above stated relief. The authorities may consider the same in the li^it of subsequent development, including termination fix»m service, in accordance with law and pass ai^ropriate ordas, as no wder has been - passed in respect of allowances payable to tfae petitioner during the periodofsuspension. ' T—— Asttt