IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2010 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 26527 of 2010(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- BLOSSOM CATHERINE.B,D/O.BAISIL SEBASTIAN,KALLELI PUREIDAM,KAIKULANGARA, KOLLAM KACHERI PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT,KERALA. BY ADVS. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI SRI. JOSEPH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT SECRETARY,COUNCIL FOR INDIAN SCHOOL,CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION,PRAJATI HOUSE, III FLOOR,47-48,NEHRU PALACE,NEW DELHI 110 505. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO EDUCATION,CENTRAL SECRETARIAT,NEW DELHI. 3. REV.SR.REXIA MARY,PRINCIPAL, VIMALA HRIDAYA SCHOOL, ISC PAZHAYATTINKUZHI, KOLLAM 691 010. R1 & R3 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. T.K. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C) NO.26527/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT OF RS.800. P2 COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT SLIP DT. 1/6/2010 FOR PRE-CHECK CHARGES BY THE I.S.C. EXAMINATION 2010. P3 COPY OF THE INTIMATION SENT BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT ON 25/6/2010. P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. P5 COPY OF THE PASS CERTIFICATE OF I.S.C.(YEAR 12). P6 COPY OF THE ADMISSION CARD I.S.C. OF THE PETITIONER OFFERING SUBJECTS SUCH AS 1 ENGLISH, 2, ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION. 3, MALAYALAM.4, PHYSICS. 5, CHEMISTRY AND 6 BIOLOGY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 26527 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to revalue and scrutinize the Chemistry Paper of the ISC Examination of the petitioner. 2. As pointed out by the respondents, there is no provision in the regulation providing for revaluation and scrutiny. It is settled position of law that revaluation and scrutiny are governed by the regulations and in the absence of which, no student has a right to claim such relief. In that view, I am not persuaded to issue the direction as sought for. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp