1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 29 of 2010 Suresh v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr V.N. Morande, Adv for applicant Mr S.B. Ahirkar, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 21st January 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Interim bail was granted to applicant vide order dated 7th January 2010. Learned APP submits that custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary to carry out and complete investigation into the crime. 2. Learned Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in his order has observed that applicant is absconding since the date of registration of crime against him. There are statements of witnesses to implicate him in crime. Complainant Anil who was responsible for making recruitment of Home Guards lodged complaint that applicant threatened him to expose through his newspaper if he did not part with Rs. 7000/-. It also appears that applicant posed himself as reporter of certain newspaper, but upon enquiries, it was noticed that he is not reporter of that 2 particular newspaper. Considering the activities of applicant, as are prima facie seen, this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to him. Application is rejected. Interim order dated 7th January 2010 stands vacated. Applicant may surrender before the trial Court and seek for regular bail which application, if made, shall be decided by the trial Court on its own merit. Judge. Hsj