IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42292 of 2009 RAJESH YADAV, Son of Dinesh Yadav, Resident of Village-Sisbabarhi, police Station Phulparas, District Madhubani. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 7/12/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner, facing allegation for the offence under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, has his defence that he has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner’s implication in the present case is only to the extent that he was found moving around the area and in fact when nothing at all has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner or any material has been also gathered to show his direct involvement in the offence in question, the petitioner would deserve to be enlarged on bail. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner was found in the company of the notorious criminals including co-accused Omprakash Yadav and Sunil Kumar Yadav who have five to ten criminal cases still pending against them. The petitioner also appears to be one among them, inasmuch as, it is said that four criminal cases are also 2 pending against him. All these facts being mentioned in the order rejecting bail to the petitioner when he has also not even sought to controvert them in the bail application, the same has to be accepted to be correct and thus good enough for his implication in this case as well. That being so, the chequered history of the petitioner and other materials as recorded in the impugned order are sufficient to deny him bail and accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected with a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial itself against the petitioner. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)