1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.422 OF 2007 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST.NO.20925 OF 2007 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6278 OF 2002 Sidramayya Siddhya Swami .. Applicant Vs. The Sabhapati, Krushi Utpanna Bazar Samiti and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.G.Kudale for the applicant Mr.G.S.Godbole for respondent no.1 Mr.S.K.Chinchalikar, A.G.P. for respondent no.2 CORAM : J. N. Patel, Acting C.J. & S.C.Dharmadhikari, J. DATE : May 4, 2010 P.C. : 1. This is an application for condonation of delay. 2. The impugned order was not communicated on the address of the applicant by the advocate. There has been a delay of 42 days in preferring this appeal. Though strictly speaking this may not be a good and sufficient 2 reason for condonation of delay, we are inclined to consider the application in the interest of justice but subject to payment of cost. We therefore, condone the delay on the appellant paying the sum of Rs.5,000/­ to the counsel for the respondent by depositing it in the court on or before 10.06.2010. It is made clear that if the cost is not deposited as directed by this court, the application would stand dismissed for want of prosecution without further reference to this court. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J