^7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S)No. H%5 / 2010 PETITIONER Govind Kumar Sao S/o Shri K. R. Sao, Aged about 46 years, Occupation- Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Borsi, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^<3··;; s&a.-' ^^i^ -^y' ^ 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur (CG) /• 3. District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) / 4. The Director, Chhattisgarh Professional Exam Board Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1189 of2010 PETITIONER : Govind Kumar Sao. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh&Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 22nd day of March, 2010) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to declare the result ofthe examination for selection to the post ofLecturer heldon 25.10.2009. 2. Shri Tiwari, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that fhe respondent No. 2 issued an advertisement on 11.09.2009 (Annexure P/3) for selection and appointment on the post of Lecturer. Pursuant to the said advertisement, the examination was conducted on 25.10.2009. Thereafter, on 29.11.2009, the examination for selection on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade I was held. However, the result of fhe examination for selection of the post of Lecturer has not yet been declared. Thus, a writ/direction may be issued to the respondents to declare the result of the examination for selection on the post of Lecturer, before publication of the result of the examination for selection on the post of Shiksha Karmi, Grade I. 3. On pemsal ofthe documents and considering the pleadings, there.is no infringement of statutory, legal or any other rights, which can be complained ofin this writ petition. Thus, a writ/direction granting relief, as aforestated, to the petitibner cannot be issued. 4. However, having regard to the fact situation of the case that the petitioner has already made a representation on 05.03.2010 (Annexure P/6), the same may be considered and decided by the respondent aufhorities in accordance with law, expeditiously. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge