CW 7108/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.7108/2010 Chhitarlal Versus Board of Revenue & Ors Date of Order ::: 26/05/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Bhanu Pareek, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed assailing order dt.28/05/2004 (Ann.3) passed by the Board of Revenue whereby the matter was remanded back to the Assistant Collector, Bundi with the direction to re-examine the issue fresh in accordance with law – against which review petition (TA/9132/2008) as it appears to be practice in the Board of Revenue was filed but has been rejected vide order dt.18/11/2009 (Ann.4). Respondent-4 (plaintiff) filed application U/s 183 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act before Asstt. Collector, Bundi in respect of the land bearing Khasra No.179 of village Keshavrai Patan, over which petitioner being member of Scheduled Caste claimed khatedari rights and its possession. It appears from the record that two separate reports were prepared on 17/02/2001 and 22/08/1988 under order of the Asstt. Collector and both the reports were observed to be conflicting each others and the same has not been taken note of by Asstt. Collector before deciding application filed by CW 7108/10 //2// respondent – against which 2nd appeal was preferred before the Board of Revenue. After taking note of material on record, the Board observed that since both the reports being conflicting in nature were not properly examined by the Asstt. Collector, to whom the matter was remanded to re-examine afresh. However, it appears that there has been a general practice of filing review petitions as happened in instant case, review petition was filed against the remand order dt.28/05/2004 which came to be decided vide order dt.18/11/2009. Taking note of material on record and having considered contention advanced by Counsel, this Court does not find any manifest error apparent on the face of record which may warrant interference in the order impugned dt.18/11/2009 (Ann.4). However, before parting with the order, this Court would like to observe that there is a general practice before the Board of Revenue in entertaining review petitions against final orders passed by the Board, as has happened in instant case. It is expected from the Chairman of the Board to examine this issue and to find out justification in entertaining such review petitions as in practice being followed. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. A copy of this order be CW 7108/10 //3// sent to the Chairman, Board of Revenue, Ajmer for necessary compliance. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.3/ 7108CW2010May26DsReviewBOR.doc