HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.5350 of 2000 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P. Kishore Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, had submitted that the issue involved in the present writ petition is whether the petitioner is entitled for increments during the suspension period or not, but so far the respondents have not decided as to whether the petitioner is entitled for increments during suspension period or not. Therefore, counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate orders be passed in the writ petition directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders as to whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of increments during suspension period or not. Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents had contended that the case of the petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed, if not already passed. This Court, having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that this writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondents to consider as to whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of increments during the suspension period or not, and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if not already passed. 2 With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 1st August 2019 v v