a-?. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA & HON'BLE SHRLJUSTiCE R.L.JHANWAR W.A. No.281/2009 Subhash Kar, Aged 52 years, S/o Shri tertikeshwar Kar, Posted as Sahayak Antarik Lekha Prikshan Avam Kararopan Adhikar and Incharge Panchayat Avam SamaJ Shikhsa Sangathak, At Janpad Panchayat, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 I'Siteitia State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural DeveSopment Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The Director, Panchayat & Social Welfare, Chhattisgarh, H.Q.-Raipur The Coliector, District Mahasamund (C.G.) The Deputy Director, Panchayat and Socia! Welfare, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.)_ Shri M.M. Nag, The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SEGTION 2(11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCHl ACT. 2006 Shri R.K. Kesharwani, Counsel forthe appellant. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Government Advocate forthe State/ Respondents No.1 to 4. \ ~te^.. 'E83" 11 W.A.No.291/2009 21 ORAL ORDER The following order of the Court was passed by Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. Heard on admission. Being aggrieved with the order dated 24.09.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.5528/2009, by the learned Single Judge of this Court, the appellant/petitioner has filed this writ appeal. It appears that the appellant/petitioner was suspended by order dated 14.09.2009 (Annexure P/1 in the writ petition). This order was challenged on the ground that it was passed with malaMe Intention on vague allegations without holding any preliminary enquiry. The learned Single Judge observed that the oniy requirement for placing a person under suspension is that there is some allegation and on the basis of the said allegation, either enquiry is contemplated or has been initiated. It was further observed that the suspension was effected on the ground of contemplation of a Departmental Enquiry. Observing ail this, the iearned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed against the order of suspension dated 1 4.09.2009. Learned counsel for the appeiiant argues that the learned Single Judge erred in law in dismissing the writ petition. The order of suspension (Annexure P/1 in the writ petition) reads as under: " qirofera *?!*;<; (ifEnzRT ?T(®T)to( T[?THg? //an^T// ^VSp/W/IOOQ-W WW^ f^fFI) /09/2009 ^t ^Wii^ WTI^t TNPRT 1^ Wra tRff WTScR (^ST.aTRI.^T TT^ ^ <TO.3{&.) •9<il^l41<?il gRT g®qtt)l441cl'1 3(tol^ ^RTR TWRT t1<|t|41<^ ^t 1R gsr TR aFiTfei^r --CT ^t B^TSR cR^ aij^iiDy sito^ (^3R<r) www^ m '9961. 'ssiny deeddv pue |QJIUOO 'uoiieoyisseio) SBOIAJSS IIAIQ '9"0 34) P Q 3|ny ^o suoisjAojd 94}jepun A}uoqtne iu9}sdLuoo eq} Aq psssed sq ||9M ueo sjepjo qong IBiuaujyedea 34) p uo!}8|duj3?uoo ui eq 01 sjesdde LJOIIJM 'psssed uesq sey uoivod aMiejsdo eqi 'USLJ) pue UOSBSJ 94) }noqe S9}8}s jspjo 9t)i ^o uoiyod isuy si|) }eq} /noqs pjnoM jepjo sq} ^o jesnjsd v .bK^ISh IPlTj -/^ 1 uyr> y^wh U6 QW^S InhlM^tto b?i (bft^h l&^ *yUIK> <t>htS ^thhlttR IJ* U@feKk •9 I ^ ^JsyhEl MWQ h (PlhhlMT' Uh.lfch yiU£Bt^. ll±hlj^£hl^t ^hK hlte I i^je S^ (plbbl* tbn^bllfi b?. plt-b'fc itfc (b6^13h ftPjWib QS^ ^ t-1hpb) tb01>(* I&I&J WhVl. fc>?] Uh-llih ^»p6-S 'yjS'^l ^s '9 ISfbhlcti 'u' J ^wi U \/ feh {suA ^fc ftaiisiiiii' i^h-ibh bhl-fr (?.l*t3) t-l-Slh^l* lSi£ ' t? 1 ^ ^ctiiM.ltjK' IAJIK >W><lp PhjlP ^Pi (1JK [* ^tti |te ] UyriK; 53 ISIb|?lct> ^l tBUi^ J^ ^lhWM^, UMbh bht-ln (Mtt'hjlft l-»lhj?l(b tSi& ' E I Ci^ ISIbj7l* fe& plfcllfe. li& bKl*13h Ut?lb.h llilij ^l*^jlft t>»lh]7ltb tgs£ 'Z ^lKlA >bl I* •i,'fi ^(?i?. h.»IWIbK> lt3 ItMh^ b?i DMhh ttiWa.W •[ -ywfi SOOZ/QO/^I (fif-y bR^ish ^MQh IPtRj /Ot-600Z/ltaiL/cplh*& 1 llf|9 ^[jftbltt.K Pl(t^l3 l?;^lte Sa 1 ^ iiaia ifat^. fi^isy iM&idfe hWMdp ^Mb.h bht-i^ ttBUia& InhlMi'tb ^i tys^hia^ yiyile Uit?19K> ^* ^ (l Wtt> l i imte uuy yyK>y ^. (j^s 'iMfc & 'i^h lE^'^lte'ja&) (bOliti' Iftl^j Irihft p^ UMbh ^M £ifehutSL^ lig^ ^ 60 iiby ^2 996i iifey (i^iie UB& in^y inMh}jib) ib^ i^yiy ^ ^ ^, ifl^bK \-t. 600&I6Z'ONVM £ ,.^^1—..:.: e/ ;;' s '"• ..l.,.Hd ,^-atAt *;\r-tilJ C2< ^ W.A.No.291/2009 •^r-^'' ^' liable ifself. We do not find any substance in the appeal. The appeal is be dismissed and is herebydismissed at the motion stage Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge shya ri?T:"'