IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.395 of 2010 RAUSHAN KUMAR @ ROSHAN KUMAR S/O LAXMI PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.- ITAHRI, P.S. NAYA RAM NAGAR, DISTT.- MUNGER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME, NEW DELHI 2. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME, NEW DELHI 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, HEADQUARTER, AT NEW DELHI 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, C.R.P.F. CHANDIGARH (U.T) 5. THE D.I.G.P. GC, CRPF, PINJORE (HARYANA) 6. THE COMMANDANT, 74, BATTALION CRPF, BHOOP NAGAR KISHTWAR (J & K) 7. 2-I/C COMMANDANT, CCD 74 BN, BHOOPNAGAR, KISHTWAR (J & K) 8. THE D.I.G., CRPF GROUP CENTRE, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 9. THE D.I.G., CRPF GROUP CENTRE, MOKAMAGHAT, PATNA (BIHAR) For the Petitioner :-Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate. For the Union :- M/s Raghib Ahsan, Kalpana, Advocates. ----------- 03. 18.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the termination notice as also the termination order dated 21.7.2009 and 28.8.2009 as contained in Aannexures-1 and 2 to the writ application. It is submitted on his behalf that from the averments made in the counter affidavit, it would appear that termination of the services of the petitioner is on the ground that the petitioner suppressed information about his implication in a criminal case bearing Naya Ramnagar P.S. Case No.65 of 2004 dated 22.4.2004, but from Annexure-3 to the rejoinder affidavit the representation made by the petitioner at the time of his joining, it will appear that neither he nor the Officer-in-charge, Naya Ramnagar police station had any information about his implication in any criminal case. 3. Without going into the correctness or otherwise of the - 2 - stand taken by the petitioner in the writ petition and rejoinder affidavit, I grant liberty to the petitioner to invite the attention of the Commandant of the battalion to the aforesaid fact and if the Commandant is satisfied that petitioner was not aware of his implication in the criminal case at the time of his application then appropriate order may be passed by the Commandant. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)