IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-17131 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 24, 2011 Ch. Parhlad Kumar and others …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Petitioners-in-person. Complainant-in-person. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 74 dated 08.05.2010, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City Malaut, District Muktsar. This Court vide order dated 09.06.2010 has granted interim bail to the petitioners. Investigating Officer ASI Puran Chand is present in person. He states that petitioners have joined the investigation. However, their CRM M-17131 of 2010 custodial interrogation are required to find out the genuineness of the agreement to sell. From the perusal of the record, it seems that this is a property dispute. This Court, in the case of Sanjay Gupta and others vs. State of Punjab, Crl. Misc. No. M- 17689 of 2010, vide order dated 24.06.2010 has granted anticipatory bail to the co-accused by observing that since suit for specific performance on the basis of agreement to sell dated 12.01.2006 and 17.05.2005 is already pending and legality/genuineness of the agreement to sell is to be adjudicated by the Civil Court, therefore, custodial interrogation is not required. This Court is pained to note that almost in every civil dispute between the family members, police is seeking custodial interrogation which is totally unjustified. In the opinion of this Court, civil dispute has been given colour of criminal case which is not permissible under the law. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 09.06.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioners-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when they are required. March 24, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2