IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7375 of 2011 MITHILESH PASWAN & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Allegedly, petitioners committed sodomy on informant and one other victim. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the informant and victim were medically examined but no sign of sodomy was found. It is further pointed out by him that several litigations are going on between the parties and as a matter of fact this case is nothing but only an attempt to falsely implicate the petitioners in false case. Learned counsel appearing for informant points out that a representation has already been filed against the medical report and so far as the present case is concerned, not only Dy.S.P., but S.P. has also found the case true and the victim as well as informant have supported the prosecution case under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions of the parties as well as facts and 2 circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Mithilesh Paswan and (2) Ganga Ram Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 205 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)