IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 603 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 07/04/2009 in WP NO : 7211 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Sri R.Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy S/o.Late R.J.Swamy Survey of India.CST & MP Staff Co-op.Credit Society Ltd R/o.Plot No.24, Lalitha Nagar, Sainagar colony, Nagole Hyderabad-500068 2 Sri.M.K.Deekshitulu S/o.Late M.Sri Rama Murthy Survey of India.CST & MP Staff Co-op.Credit Society Ltd R/o.12-13-224, Flat No.102, Sri Sai Homes Tarnaka, Secunderabad ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Survey of India CST & MP Staff Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Uppal, Hyderabad-500039 Regd.TB.No.11, rep.by its Secretary Sri.P.Kumar 2 The Survey of India CST & MP Staff Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Uppal, Hyderabad-500039.Regd.TB.No.11, rep.by its President Sri P.Kumar, .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.S.ASHOK ANAND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO :603 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 7.4.2009 made in W.P.M.P.No.9461 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 7211 of 2009, whereby and whereunder the learned single Judge declined to grant the interim relief sought for by the appellants. The appellants are the writ petitioners. They filed the aforementioned writ petition before the learned single Judge challenging the proceedings dated 23.3.2009 of the respondents whereunder the respondents took a decision to pay consolidated pay to the appellants by treating them as temporary employees with effect from 1.4.2009. In that writ petition, they also filed W.P.M.P. No. 9461 of 2009 seeking to direct the respondents to pay the regular pay scales to the appellants by suspending the impugned proceedings dated 23.3.2009 of the respondents. The learned single Judge, by the impugned order, dismissed the aforementioned W.P.M.P. on the ground that the relief claimed in the said application cannot be granted unless the appellants succeed in the main writ petition. Challenging the said order, the appellants filed the present writ appeal. Heard Sri S. Ashok Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the order of the learned single Judge. Admittedly, whether the appellants are entitled for the relief sought for by them in the aforementioned application or not has to be decided in the main writ petition and the same cannot be granted without deciding the main writ petition. The learned single judge, therefore, rightly dismissed the W.P.M.P. and we do not find any reason to disturb the said order. However, at this stage, the learned counsel for the appellants requested the Bench that at least liberty may be granted to him to serve personal notices on the respondents by Registered Post Acknowledgment Due returnable in three weeks. While granting such permission, the writ appeal is disposed of. The registry is directed to post the main writ petition itself for hearing before the learned single Judge on 3.8.2009. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 15th June, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb