THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No.699 of 2009 JUDGMENT: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.10.2009 in E.A. No.22 of 2007 in E.P. No.20 of 1999 on the file of the XXII Additional Chief Judge, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby the claim petition under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) filed by the petitioner was dismissed. 2. The first respondent herein filed Original Suit No.20 of 1999 against the respondents 2 and 3 herein, and the same was decreed by the IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad on 16.4.1999. Thereafter, the first respondent herein filed the above Execution Petition before the court below for realization of the decreetal amount, by way of attachment and sale of the Execution Petition schedule property. During pendency of the Execution Petition, the petitioner filed the claim petition not to sell the schedule property stating that she is the owner of the property, which was dismissed by the impugned order. 3. Heard both sides. 4. It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that during pendency of this appeal, the claim in so far as it relates to the appellant/claim petitioner is concerned, is compromised with the first respondent, and that the first respondent company agreed to raise attachment in so far as the property of the appellant. The appellant and the authorized officer of the first respondent company are present in the court. They are identified by their respective counsel. Both the parties agreed for the compromise. In view of the fact that the matter in respect of the claim of the appellant is settled out of court by paying Rs.6,50,000/- which has been accepted by the first respondent so as to raise attachment of the execution application filed by the appellant herein. Therefore, in terms of the compromise, attachment of the said property is raised. It is made clear that the property of the appellant shall not be brought under sale. To the extent indicated above, compromise is recorded. The terms of the compromise shall be annexed to this order. 5. The Appeal Suit is disposed of in terms of the compromise. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 14.02.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No.699 of 2009 14.2.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No.699 of 2009 14.2.2011 Between: Mrs. Aziz Bee …Appellant And TCI Finance Ltd. & others. …Respondents