1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.328 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2005 Trisma Constructions Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant. Vs. Mrs.Shama Prakash Lunawat & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.I.M.Khairadi for the Appellant. Mr.Tejas Deshpande for Respondent No.1. Ms.Meena Bhambhlani for Respondent No.9. Mr.Rahul Oak for Respondent Nos.10 and 11. ... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 12th December, 2005. P.C. : On behalf of the First Respondent, learned counsel states that on 6th December, 2005 the Supreme Court expedited the disposal of the suit 2 instituted by the First Respondent (Special Civil Suit 186 of 2004) and parties agreed to the maintenance of the status quo in the meantime. A copy of the order of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal 7367 of 2005 (Trishma Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Shama Prakash Lunawat& Ors.) has been placed on the record. All the learned counsel are agreed in stating before this Court that in view of the order of status quo that has been passed by the Supreme Court with the consent of the parties, this Appeal from Order does not survive. On the statement thus made by all the learned counsel before the Court, the Appeal from Order is accordingly disposed of. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, the Civil Application is rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.