Crl. Misc. No.M-4372 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-4372 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 27, 2010 Sumer …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.S.S. Narula, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Pawan Hooda, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. Petitioner seeks the concession of bail in a case registered at the instance of Kuldeep alleging that his son Sushil had been inflicted injuries by Durjan, Rajinder Patwari and others by visiting his gher. His son was taken away in a vehicle which stood parked in the street. Subsequently the complainant came to learn that his son was lying near a pump at Madluada. Crl. Misc. No.M-4372 of 2010 [2] Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and that no specific injury is attributed to him. He has been in custody since April 17, 2009. Counsel for the complainant and counsel for the State has opposed the petition for bail contending that the petitioner has been specifically named by disclosing his relationship to co-accused Durjan by stating that the brother-in-law (sala) of Durjan armed with iron rod at the time of the occurrence had inflicted injuries on the person of deceased Sushil alongwith others. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had also facilitated the escape of his co-accused as he was driving the Scorpio which was used for commission of offence. The petitioner has been attributed a role of having gone with his co-accused to the gher of Kuldip in a Scorpio. The injuries were inflicted on the person of the deceased and after that he was forcibly placed in the vehicle and he was brought to nearby petrol pump where injuries were again inflicted on his person by the assailants. The recovery of the vehicle has also been got effected from the petitioner. In view of the active part played by the petitioner not only in the commission of crime but having driven the body of the deceased, the petitioner cannot be granted the concession of bail at this stage. The role of the co-accused is different from the role of the petitioner as such this petition is dismissed at this stage.. September 27, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE Crl. Misc. No.M-4372 of 2010 [3]