^ Iftil BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ^ BILASPUR WRIT PETITION f S ^ No. '^>, 2011 PETITIONER: Bhaiya Ram S/o Subhau Ram, Aged about 50 years, R/o Village Awanrabhata, Post, &Tehsil & District^alod^C.Gr>@^ <:<<^* Posted as Labour atPV^^ub 'tg((,(,i Division No. 1 , Balod, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Public Works Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G.. 2. Engineer in Chief, Public Works Department Sirpur Bhawan, Civil Line, Akashwani Chowk, Raipur, C.G. ^" 3. Chief Engineer Public Works Department Civil Line, Akashwani Chowk, Raipur, C.G. ^" ^ . . 4. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department D.urg Circle, Durg C.G. 5. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department Balod DjvJsion,^Balo^) C.G. "\y<' !-w- a^t^tfk <- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 " OF THE CONSTITUTION INDIA / /V \/\ /\/ ^w' ^ssy 'w^ ^y^ ^^ ^ -^ r"—n HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB MR. JUSTEC3S PRITINKER DIWAHBR PBTITIONBR RESPOHDENTs W.P.fSt.NO. 6947/2011 Bhaiya Ram versus State of Chhattisgarh fi5 Others Shri Alok Dewaagan, counsel for the petitioner. ShriN.NahaRoy, P.L. for the State. WRET PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDBR 124.11.2011) Counsel for fhe petitioner submits fhat fhough the petitioner is entiUed for the scale of Rs. 2750-70-3800-75-4400 but he has wrongly been graated the scale of Rs. 2550-55-2660-3200. Conteution of tlie coiinsel for the petitioner is that the representations (ABnexure P/2) ofthe petitioner are pendiiig aiid he inay be perinitted to wifhdraw fhis petitioii with liberty to pursue the saaie. He further subinits that case ofthe petitioner has already been recommended by the respondente 2 to 5. Accox'dingly the petitiou is disinissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge