IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 284 of 2005 (S/B) Smt. Rashmi Panwar. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & others. .………. Respondents. Ms. Joyce Irwin, Advocate holding brief of Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 29.04.2010 29.04.2010 G