IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2009 / 3RD ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17045 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. KAREEMGHAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.ABDULGHAN, KOCHITHARA (H), EZHUPUNNA, CHERTHALA, ALLEPPEY. 2. FAREEDA, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.KAREEMGHAN, KOCHITHARA (H), EZHUPUNNA, CHERTHALA, ALLEPPEY. BY ADV. SRI.M.J.SANTHOSH SRI.V.A.NAVAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AROOR POLICE STATION, ALLEPPEY DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.17045 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 24th June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. This writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the second respondent not to harass the petitioners or to summon them to the police station, except in accordance with law. It is submitted that apprehending arrest, petitioners have filed Bail Application, B.A.No.2909/2009, and the matter is under consideration by this Court. Ext.P1 order also states that there was an undertaking by the Public Prosecutor not to arrest the petitioners, till such time instruction is received. As such, the petitioners can bring to the notice of the Court about any alleged illegality, in case an attempt is made to arrest them. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that crime is registered subsequently. W.P.(C) No.17045 of 2009 2 However, it is not necessary for us to go into the merits of the matter, since the matter is pending before another Court. 3. As regards the allegation that some articles belonging to the petitioner have been seized by the second respondent, the learned Government Pleader submits that the same has been produced before the Magistrate Court. If so, nothing prevents the petitioner in approaching that Court for appropriate remedies. As such, we are of the view that no further orders are required in this matter. Leaving open the right of the petitioners as aforesaid, the writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.