ZN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CG) a. Civil Revision No. )^'-> Of '2004 §j||g|eBsnCh ( Memorandum o£ Civit Revision U/S 115 of C,P,C* ) /• EETITIQNER RE-SPONDENT s Rajendra Verma S/o Late shri Ratan Lal Verma^ aged about 41 yearSf r/o ]3^5» Pension BQda»Ra&par» Tehsil and District Raipur (CG)<| Versas :^ Smt» Neelam Verma W/o Shrx Rajendra QTermat x±£^x0^resJL^ent of 3/619 Behind Indrawatl Colony^ Raja Talab Etaipur» Tehsil and Dlstrl.ct RQJLpiir<i MEMOR^DUM OF CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF C»P<Co 1: 1 II t-^ |^^j l^.j i^;-l-l:.:» ^. 's. HSGH COURT OF JUDJCATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR CJVILREVJSION N0,125 OF 2004 O R D E R PostJtfor: 02/11/2004 SdA ^ CfaiefJustice j 'y • <- .^ c .;,:.' .^ ^. 'S <. ^~ \x.< .<. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : AT BILASPUR. Civil Revision No.125 of 2004. Rajendra Verma - Versus- Smt. Neelam Verma Appiicant by Smt. Indira Tripathi, Advocats. Respondent by Ms. Kavita Naidu, Advocate. State by Shri J.D. Bajpai, Government Advocate. Qrder ( 5._Noyember.2004) Learned couns^! appearing for the Stats submits that the Police investjgation revea's that the advertisemsnt in the newspaper namejy ? "Deshbandhu" dated 28-04-2004 was given only by Rajendra Verma. the applicant herein. (2) Learned counsel for the applicant read out the impugned order and also transtatod it into English. On a consideration of the entire matter, the order of the trial Court that the applicant shouid pay Rs.2,000/- per month as maintenance pendente-lite and a!so directing him to pay Rs.2,000/- to^^rds iitigatjon expenses, cannot be sajd to be erroneous. Certainly, the impugned order does not call for any interference. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- ChiefJustice i