IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8365 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 07, 2010. Gurbinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Parminder Pal Singh Thethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the selection result for the posts of Assistant Librarian on the plea that she was one of the applicants and her merit has not been correctly determined by not awarding marks for the higher qualification of M.Lib. Degree possessed by her. The petitioner's case is that if appropriate marks are awarded to her for the said higher qualification, she will be amongst the selected candidates. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities but without any response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and keeping in view the factual assertion made on her behalf, I am of the considered view that it is imperative upon the respondents to verify the C.W.P.No .8365 of 2010 2 facts and redress the grievance of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to summon the records, ascertain the petitioner's claim and decide as to whether or not she is entitled to be given marks for the higher qualification and/or she would make it to the merit list. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. May 07, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE