1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.2710 of 2006 Sweta Pandit ..... Petitioner vs MHADA and ors .... Respondents Mr R.P. Pandey i/b M/s PRS Legal for petitioner Mr K.R.Belosey Acg. G. P. for the respondent State. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J.,& S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: APRIL 27, 2007. P.C.:- We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The application of the petitioner for allotment of row house was rejected on the ground of ineligibility i.e. her monthly income was less than the prescribed one. The learned Officiating Government Pleader appearing for the respondents states that they would consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders afresh. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within six weeks from today and communicate the same to the petitioner. 2 The interim order to continue till the passing of fresh order and, if the same is adverse to the petitioner, two weeks thereafter. Petition stands disposed of with the above observations, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.