THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.15729 of 2006 Between: Tappeta Lakshmi. .. PETITIONER and The Station House Officer, Ghanpur Police Station, Ghanpur and four others. .. RESPONDENTS ORDER: This writ petition has been ﬁled for declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in trying to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 with regard to Ac.5-00 cents of land in Sy.No.433/2 at Karkapalli village, Ghanpur Mandal, Warangal District, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5. It is the case of the petitioner that when respondents 4 and 5 tried to interfere with the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner ﬁled O.S.No.12 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the Junior Civil Judge, Mulugu, along with an application I.A.No.17 of 2006 for grant of temporary injunction. The temporary injunction was granted on 05-06-2006. It is further contended that the ﬁrst respondent sent the police personnel to the house of the petitioner on 19-07-2006 and forced the petitioner and her husband to come to the police station. A counter has been ﬁled on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 denying all the allegations made in the aﬃdavit ﬁled in support of the writ petition and stated that they never interfered with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5, that they never forced the petitioner and her husband to come to the police station and that when no case is registered or pending against the petitioner, the question of interference with the oﬃcial respondents does not arise. In view of the categorical denial of all the allegations made by the petitioner against the police oﬃcials, I am of the opinion that no orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with a liberty to take appropriate action against the police oﬃcials, as and when they interfere with the civil disputes of the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 29-01-2007 Prv