IN THE HIGH COURT oi- JIEDICATURE AT BILAsmR (c.G.) ‘Z/ WRIT PETITION Naar} Q- ‘Wb5) 03' 2001 B ETWEEN "Kumari Sulochana, aged 25 years, D/o N.D.Patel, reSident 0f Village Pithora, Tahsil Mahasamund, District mhasamund. %TI TIONER AND 1 mief A Municipal O££icer, Nagar Panchayat, Pithara, matrict and Tahsil Mahasamund. Dinesh Singh Patel, aged 26 years, S/o Y.F.Pate1, R/o Village Pithora, Tahsil ana District Mahasamuné. a. ¥‘-‘v@'. ;" "", Nagar Panchayat, Pithora, (kt; .- I 93-WA Tahsil and Districtt Mahaaamnna§1J J y ( RESPONDENTS Jy' WIT EWITION UNDER ARTIaEs 226/227 OF THE comsTITUTION OF I é R NDIA E'OR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANYI OTHER APPROPRIATE FORM W‘IICH THIS HON'BLE CWR‘I‘ DEEMS FIT ‘ The petitioner named above humbiry submits as under:— - i x *" Heard Shri L.C.Das, Iear'ned counsel for The pe‘l'i‘rioner. The writ pefi'rioner was given appoinfmen'r on 07.04.1999 as r Shiksha Karmi Grade I in Thé subjjecf of Chemis‘rry of Govt Girls Higher Secondary School, Pi‘rhorni Subsequenfly, on 25.10.1999, i another order was issued 'by The oilec'ror. The operative par‘r of 'l'he said order s'ra‘res 'iha'r 'rhe pefiiioner shall be allowed 'ro confinue unfil the new selecfio is m‘ade and The process of selec‘rion should be compIeTed wi‘illhin 15fidays. Unfor‘runa'rely, no fresh selection has been made However, while ‘rhe ‘i'ill dafe. petitioner was still serving as Shiksha Karmi Grade I in the subject :hool, the impugned order dated 1e service of the writ petitioner l that the said impugned order of termination was issued consequent to the order passed by‘ther Collector on 25.10.1999. of Chemistry at the aforesaid sc 08.10.2001 was issued by which 'H was terminated. It may be statec On c‘areful perusal of the relevant documents placed on record, it id clear that the Collector's order simply stated that fresh selectio should be made within 15 days and that until the next selection e petitioner should be allowed to continue. If it is correct that no resh selection has been made till date, no order of termination could have been issued and that too’ .. . .. U KP Mo 11$ “K . ... mm? \ Egqim. wk: mxa mm?! %rq? 3W1 BWvHPEH ’ Wm mm aEa 1 EHW WTWE‘I TE??? 1mg i ‘ é? 5W «129; - 27,112001 31mm WWW ‘m 81W \ r, consequent 1‘0 fhe d"rec1'ion of The Coliecmr, prima facial Wm; ieierence of fhe orde of ferminafion is called for. ~ In fhe result is peiifion is disposed of. The impugned ardér- of Termina'rimLissued 9n, 08.10.2001 by ‘rhe Nagar)? Panchnyaf, Pi‘rhom is r Chemistry fo con'finue‘ a‘r fhe as afovJ Shik 'l'm‘ 'Kermi‘Gr-dde L I in fhe subject of 1' aside. The petitioner- shall [be allowed sa‘‘id'school.