'iN THE HEGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR WP. (C) No. 18235 ofjzoog RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226L227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF‘ INDIA W (SB: Hon’bLe Shri Satish K. Agm‘hotri J.) Shri Somkant Vermtg—Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, 13.911161 Lawyer for the rgspondents. ORDER‘ (Passed on This 8th Day ofApril, 2009) Learned counsel appealmg for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners do not want to contest this peti’n'on on merits at this stage. However, the respondent—authorities may be directed to consider and decide their pending applications dated 2. 1.2009 (Annexure P] 1 and P] 2) in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiousiy as possible. Shn' Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer apyeating for the respondents submits that there is no reason asto why the pending applications, if any, of the petitioners, as stated above, should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Thakur submits that if the above-stated applications are pending, those applications shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, Within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In View of the clear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, according to learned counsel appearing for the pentioners, nothing remains to be adjudicated. Accordingly, the petitionpéstands disposed of. No order asto costs. i Sd/- i 1 i Satish K. Agnihotri i y Judge l Thakur sh I Petitioners 1. Ramkumar Kurre, 3/0 Shri Telashi Respondent Kurre, Aged about 50 years, Rfo Post Police Station Palari District Raipur {C.G.) 2. Vijay Kurre, S/o Shn' Ramknmar Kurre, aged Station about 26 years, R/o Post Telashi Police Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondent Regional Transport Authority, Raipur Region Non— Commissioner Office, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur applicant (C. G.)