1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8943 OF 2009 M/s Joy Frozen Foods Pvt Ltd .. Petitioner Vs Joint Registrar of Co-operative Soceity’s.... and ors .. Respondents Mr. R.S.Desai i/bThodur Law Associaqtes, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr K.J.Hakani for respondent no.2. Mrs Neha Bhide, AGP, for respondent nos 1,4 to 8. Mr. ABC, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 10/11/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents waives service. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 31.8.2009 passed by the Joint Registrar of Co-op.Societies (Co.Op.Industrial Estate), by which he has allowed application No.1 of 2009 filed by respondent no.2 under section 22(2) of the T 2 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners have made a statement in the petition that against the order dated 31.8.2009 passed by the Joint Registrar, they have preferred revision application before the State and since the concerned Minister was not available, they have filed the present writ petition challenging the very same order. Since now the concerned Minister is available, I do not find any reason to entertain this writ petition and I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice. (i) Respondent no.4 or the Principal Secretary of the Department shall endeavour to decide the revision application filed by the petitioner on 7.10.2009 (Exhibit “O” to the writ petition) as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. (ii) Till the revision is decided within the time stipulated, the order dated 31.8.2009 passed by the Joint Registrar, shall remain stayed and for a period of 15 days thereafter if the order passed on the revision application is adverse to the petitioner. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (iii)It is made clear that while passing this order I have not examined the merits of the case and the concerned authority shall decide the revision application on merits in 3 accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of being heard to all the parties to the revision application. Rule is made absolute in terms of this order. No costs. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)