IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 22876 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2009 Sayabu Bhimrao Dhotre ..... Applicant vs. 1.Shri.Shivaji Maruti Waghire & Ors. ..... Respondents ------- Mr.S.D.Thokde, adv.for applicant. Ms.Pallavvi Dabholkar, adv.for respondents no.3 and 4. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By the order dated 16th September 2009, the Second Appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed in limine. On the same day, the learned counsel for the appellant had applied for continuation of the ad-interim order running in the Second Appeal. He was however, unable to point out the ad-interim order. Therefore, his application for continuation of the ad-interim order was not considered on that date. Today, the appellant has taken out the present Civil Application for continuation of the ad-interim order which was passed on 10th September, 2009 on Civil Application No.1536 of 2008 by granting prayer clause (d) thereof. 3. Ms.Dabholkar, the learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4 makes a grievance that the notice given to her is a very short notice. Mr.Thokade, states that when the Civil Application was sought to be served upon the learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, he was informed that the learned counsel has already returned the papers. Since by the present Civil Application, the appellant seeks a very limited relief of continuation of the ad-interim order for a reasonable period, the same is disposed off with with an order that the ad- interim order is continued for a period of 4 weeks from today. [JUDGE]