1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.14364 of 2011 G.Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar. 2.The Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, N.C.P.210, 28, Judges Bungalow, P.N.Kumarasamy Raja Salai, Chennai - 600 028. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar. 4.P.Rajammal ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct fair and proper enquiry with regard to the funds allotted to Integrated Waste Land Development Project II Scheme, pursuant to the petitioner's representations and take appropriate action to recover the misused funds and to take criminal action against the 4th respondent within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jawahar For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj, 1 to 3 Government Advocate O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY K.N.BASHA, J] The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for the relief of a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct fair and proper enquiry with regard to the funds allotted to Integrated Waste Land Development Project II Scheme, on the basis of the his representations and to take appropriate action to recover the misused funds and to take criminal action against the 4th respondent within a stipulated time. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.Mr.R.Anandharaj, learned Government Advocate takes notice for respondents 1 to 3. We are of the view that notice need not be issued to the 4th respondent, since the interest of the 4th respondent would also be protected by this order. 3.By mutual consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate, on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5.Considering the limited prayer sought for, this Court, without going into the merits of the representations of the petitioner, dated 16.08.2011 and 29.11.2011, is constrained to direct the first respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner, dated 16.08.2011 and 29.11.2011, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent and other relevant parties, and to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. It is further made clear that the petitioner shall also furnish a fresh copy of the representations, to the first respondent along with the order copy of this Court within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar. 2.The Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, N.C.P.210, 28, Judges Bungalow, P.N.Kumarasamy Raja Salai, Chennai - 600 028. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Collectorate Complex, Virudhunagar. + 1 cc to Mr.S.Jawahar, Advocate, SR No.44256 + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.44318 Order in WP(MD)No.14364 of 2011 Dated:16.12.2011 gcg RJ/28.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/