IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2005 Sitaram S. Mali ...Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada ) Court‘s or Judge‘s Orders or directions and ) Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri P.S. Dani for the petitioner - absent Mrs. M.P.Thakur AGP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & D.B. D.B. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 14TH SEPT., 2005 14TH SEPT., 2005 14TH SEPT., 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Collector, Raigad, rejecting the application of the petitioner under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, as barred by limitation. Adequate reasons are given in the order for rejecting the application. The petitioner had full knowledge of the fact that the award was passed. In such circumstances the rejection is proper. Hence no interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. *****