IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24515 of 2010 DINESH YADAV, S/o Kishun Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 143, 144 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of Explosive Substance Act, Sections 2 and 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. It has been submitted the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report which has been instituted about the occurrence of damage of school building by unknown miscreants. Subsequently, the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused who was arrested and he disclosed his complicity in the confessional statement of the co-accused and thereafter he was remanded in the present case while he was remanded in another case. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No. 122 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The Magistrate will insist proper verification of the petitioner as well as bailors so that there is no confusion about the identity at a later point of time. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays 3 the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned will verify the fact that the petitioner is accused in only one other case besides the present one before releasing the petitioner on bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)