IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8369 of 2011 DILIP KUMAR, S/O LATE RAM CHARITRA MISTRI, R/O MOHALLA-LAKHI BAGH, P.O. AND P.S.- MASHAURI, DISTRICT-PATNA. ........PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER- CUM-SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. THE DIRECTOR, SOIL CONSERVATOR, BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT SOIL CONSERVATOR OFFICER, GAYA. 7. SOIL CONSERVATOR OFFICER, NAWADA. 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIKRAM, PATNA. .......RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 19.05.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the departmental proceeding against the petitioner has now concluded and the petitioner has been released from suspension only with a punishment of warning. Thereafter, he has filed a representation for release of salary of the suspension period also as in the punishment order, it was mentioned that the period of suspension shall be treated as on work. He submits that the petitioner will file a fresh representation before the concerned authority for release of his due salary of the period. The writ application is, accordingly, 2 disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority that if the petitioner files a fresh representation the same should be considered and disposed of in accordance with law with release of his admissible salary, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)