IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5199 OF 2009 Between: Adilakshmamma ..... PETITIONER AND P.Balakrishnaiah Setty .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5199 OF 2009 O R D E R : The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.3 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur. The suit is filed by the plaintiff/respondent herein for specific performance of agreement of sale. The defendant/revision petitioner filed a written statement denying the transaction under the sale agreement. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.503 of 2008 under Order 6 Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code for amendment of plaint by deleting Survey No.513-1 and to add Survey No.512-2 in the suit schedule. Though the said amendment was opposed by the defendant, the Court below by order dated 28.08.2009 allowed the application. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed by the defendant. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the Court below in allowing the amendment. Since the amendment had neither changed the nature of the suit nor a new cause of action was introduced, muchless it had resulted in any injustice to the other side, the order under revision, cannot be held to be erroneous on any ground whatsoever. Hence, the interference by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not warranted. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ​_____________ Date: 19.03.2010 G. ROHINI, J. Ivd