IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17898 of 2011 AJAY YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.6.2011 Heard. The case relates to demanding extortion by giving telephonic calls through a Cellular phone. It is true that the involvement of the petitioner has appeared from confession of a co-accused but no reason has been shown to the court as to why such confessing accused could implicate the petitioner falsely. It is true that the confession of a co-accused may not be admissible but it could be sufficient for raising suspicion under which a man could legally be arrested for being interrogated after obtaining him on remand by the court. Still, the report relates to investigation and granting anticipatory bail appear sheer interference with different stages of investigation which I am not inclined to do. Let the petitioner surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be considered without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)