IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30498 of 2010 MALLU YADAV, SON OF INDRADEO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections341, 326, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 23.6.2010 but with observation that he would renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in case there is no bifurcation of trial of the accused from the other co-accused. It has been submitted that the petitioner has been charged and this case has not been bifurcated. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of F.T.C.-IV, Jehanabad, in Sessions Trial No. 66 of 2010 arising out of Kako P.S. Case No. 132 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on 2 each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)