IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26188 of 2008 Between: A.Sanjeeva Rao S/o Chandra Rao Kendra Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND The Director Prasar Bharathi(Broadcasting) Corporation of India Doordarshan Kendra Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings No.TVH/21 (ASR)/2008 dt 12-11-2008 issued by the Director Doordarshan Kendra Hyderabad as illegal and opposed to law laid down by the Hon'ble Court and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for reinstatement to duty as Security Guard in Doordarshan Kendra Hyderabad with all consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent: Sri S.S. Varma Standing Counsel for Central Gvoernment The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring proceedings No. TVH/21(ASR)/2008, dated 12-11-2008 issued by the Director, Doordarshan Kendra, the respondent herein as arbitrary and illegal and to consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for reinstatement to duty as Senior Guard in the Doordarshan Kendra, Hyderabad with all consequential benefits. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.S. Varma, learned Standing Counsel for the Central Government appearing for the respondent and at their request, the matter is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 12-11-2008 suspending him from service on the ground that a criminal case is pending against him. The writ petition is too premature. The petitioner has straightaway approached this Court even without making any representation to the respondent to revoke his suspension. In the circumstances, the petitioner is directed to file a representation to the respondent seeking revocation of his suspension. If any such representation is filed, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. N.V. RAMANA, J 01-12-2008 ks/msv Note: Furnish CC in two days. B/O