IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 27062 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ATHIRA S.R., S/O.RAGHU C.G., AGED 18 YEARS, RESIDING AT SOWPARNIKA, PERUMPILLY P.O., MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM - 682 314. BY ADV. SRI.SAJITH KUMAR V. SMT.PRIYANKA PRASAD RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHIKSHA KENDRA, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI - 100301. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, SHIKSHA KENDRA, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, NEW DELHI - 100301. 4. THE SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, ANNA NAGAR, TAMIL NADU - 600 040. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, MAHATMA GANDHI PUBLIC SCHOOL, THIRUVANKULAM, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA FOR R1 SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC FOR CBSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.27062/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 A TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET OF THE PETITIONER OBTAINED THROUGH INTERNET. EXT.P-3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REVALUATION AND VERIFICATION NORMS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P-4 A TRUE COPY OF THE BANK RECEIPT DATED 30.05.2011 EXT.P-5 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 27062 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a 12th Standard student. Her grievance is regarding the alleged delay on the part of the authorities in conducting a rechecking of her Mathematics Paper and publishing their results. 2. The case was adjourned for the standing counsel to obtain instructions. Today when the matter came up, learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 4 submits that, on the application made by the petitioner, her marks were rechecked and that by communication dated 24/6/11, she was informed of the rechecked results. A copy of the communication has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In the light of the above, no further orders are called for in the writ petition. Writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp