< IN THE HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (0 No.S^ /2011 PEyTITIONER : Dinesh Goyal, S/o Late Maniram Goyal, aged about 46 years, R/o Jute MiU Road, Chhatamuda, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) Wunicipal Corporation, Raigarh, Through its Commissioner Raigarh, pistrict Raigarh (C.G.) 2) Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) i.- ^^w^ ^<y^ /Nl<*' ^' ^•y^ ./;y^N "L^^ ^•'^ ^>-" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION /DIRECTIONS ETC, ,e^-f f^ T~T I? '••ss^.wi ,^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH CQURT W CHHATTISGARH: BU-ASRJR WRIT PETmON (G) No. 3S880F 2011 DineshGoyat Versus ; Municifal Corporation, Raigarh & Another (Writ Petition under Articte 226of the Censtttution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. i*<rw^^ii)**^N*»«*a^dM»a i<u»Btfl«a—a»?»«NflB^«*^w<A «<II*fln»i !rt»iw*ttmnjfli ffMMiiMNUfrimih Presenl:- Ms. Hamiefe Siddiqui, Adwcate fcr th®tpetitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate for the respwident No.1. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ ;No.2.. 2. 3. (Passed onthis 11'" day of Ju!y, 2011) At the very outeet.Shri Agrawal, leamed senior counsel appearing for the respondent No,1 and Shri Thakur,|eamed counsel appearing for the State/respondent No.2, submit thsrt no st^is for demolishing the structure on the land in question shall be taken without afforcfing proper opportunity of hearing to the petitfoner. Sinse no notices have been issued tilt date, thus,at this stage.it is not necessary to go into further facts ofthe case. However, it is madeclearthat the respondent MithoriUes shalt not demolish any structure without affording proper eppertunity of hearing to the petitioner. Accordingly,the writ petition stands disposed of with ttie aforesad observaUons and direction. Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ashok ......—:-.•.„.:_-...^.tS^''