.1.. ' •/ Sjns'? & s"-3i ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITION No. ...3.7..2:.8../2004 PETITIONER IVI/s Parakh Akshat Udyog Through:- Its partner Umed Chand Parakh Gram- Labrakhurd, Distt.Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Regional Office, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA ;•(-' *iwCT^a>*ai^i 3-^.-<<i<.ii<9<<, ;®Tt)^'re,%di'yy,< Si:S^S. •2ffl^?I TRR?('jgig«!<i4) sn^iw R;-< Wn 3II^T**< \^' wnw ^ifta 3)i^[ .i.iy/ii,as/^uu4 st^y Shri P.S. Kosbv' witb IpctitioBcr. 'Slud F'radeep:Sa5iieDa for the Heard.; Leamed couiisel &r the p( ]AppeUate Tribunal has started [wadfs to wlthdxaw ffais pctition ^ |witU ari utxent application for lCourt ia similar matter bearmg Wl |oiders on 6/2/2004; They piay fo^ Leamed couaael for -tfae re< Ifeict. • Hamtng tliuy considered, th^ [adopt flie" coercive metliods for ]fhe urgent stay appUcation is Ipassedby tfae AppeBate^Ta'ibuiial. WiUi. llle aforesaifl Idisposed o£ Cpnsec[uenfly. M.W.P. No.4ti] Certtfied cdtpy as per rules; Stlri Vinod DeshinuKh. for the ,ttt!^J<rf^l'l sp-i.tif '^Js^^R^i^ %d)RlH ai^I ";Y a tespoiident. _ ititioner subinit fhat nbw fhe ^ujictioiung and •the petittOner T'lttt libcrty te prefer an appcal st^y. TUey ateb submlt that this [P. No.3506/03 Uas passed the similarorder. „ ipondent does not Afapute the : apespoDflent js' directed intat-to rectoveiy of^thfi penalty amount tOl takjen up'for UjeaTtagraud^Srder is obscr^/aliuus, Uus petilauuj tilauds .i^/04 also staiKls disposedef Gl.rRJ-^S/350—12/2000—50,000. %5^ K^^<^ ~ r^^'