IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 16474 of 2008. Decided on 18th July, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Roshan Lal and another. …Petitioners. -Versus- F.C.-cum-Secretary (PWD), Govt. of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh & another Vs. Chet Ram and others, Latest HLJ 2006 327. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to do the needful as per the principles laid down in the judgment, cited hereinabove, within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. The application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 18, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `