IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2011 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 249 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- RATHEESH, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.RAJU, RATHEESH BHAVAN, ETC (P.O), AMBALAPPURAM, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE C.I OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691506. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691506. 4. JANAB ABDUL KHARIM, ANEESHA MANZIL, VAKKANADU P.O., VAKKANADU, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691509. 5. HAJAR UMMA, ANEESHA MANZIL, VAKKANADU P.O., VAKKANADU, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691509. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR 249 OF 2011: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 7.5.2011 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.) No. 249 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 24th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner alleges illegal detention of Smt.Aneesha by her parents who are arrayed as respondents 4 and 5. 2. According to the petitioner, petitioner and the alleged detenue are in love and they agreed to get married. 3. Today, the alleged detenue was present. She would submit that she is 19 years of age. She would also submit that there is no illegal detention as alleged and that she would like to go with her parents. 4. The parents of the alleged detenue would say that they will not compel the alleged detenue for any marriage for which she is not agreeable. Learned counsel for the petitioner would raise an apprehension about threat to the life of the petitioner from the 4th respondent and his men. The 4th respondent would submit that neither he nor his men has any intention to cause any threat to the life of the petitioner. The Writ Petition (Criminal) is closed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS