IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13748 of 2011 Mahendra Paswan son of late Lakhan Paswan, resident of Village/Mohalla Ambedkar Nagar, P.S. Samastipur, District Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Zila Parishad, Samastipur. 3. The Secretary, Zila Parishad, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Samastipur. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 23.8.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in respect of designation and address of respondent no.4 in course of the day. Heard Shri Arun Kumar Bhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Surendra Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.16, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1 and Shri Prabhat Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 4. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.7.2009 as Assistant from Zila Parishad, Samastipur, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of amount of gratuity, leave encashment, due salary from November,2003 to March,2007 and benefit of A.C.P. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, for the claim raised in the present writ petition, has filed representation before respondent no.4. However, till date, no decision has been taken nor his aforesaid dues have been cleared. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4 and directing respondent no.4 to clear his all the dues. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.4 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.4 3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)