SCA/7285/1998 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7285 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= PRAVINKUMAR P THAKKAR - Petitioner(s) Versus CHAIRMAN INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR RC JANI for Petitioner(s) : 1,MR ALIHUSAIN SHAIKH for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR GN SHAH for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 22/06/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. In the present petition, the petitioner- Cooperative Society has prayed for a direction to the respondent-Indian Oil Corporation to release the supply of diesel to the petitioner SCA/7285/1998 2/3 JUDGMENT forthwith. The petitioner is a Cooperative Society and claims to have completed all the formalities for the purpose of being alloted diesel. 2. It appears that similar petitions filed by similarly situated litigants have been disposed of by learned Single Judge of this Court by common order dated 20-08-1999 in Special Civil Application No.676/1998 and allied matters. Apparently, the issue had travelled before the Division Bench for certain interim orders passed by learned Single Judge. On the basis of this interim orders eventually the learned Single Judge passed order dated 20-08-1999 in similar petitions. A copy of which is on record. 3. In view of the above position without separately elaborating on the issues, this petition is also rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (Akil Kureshi,J.) SCA/7285/1998 3/3 JUDGMENT (raghu)