,L 3W M i IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ‘BILASPUR wRIT PETITION No. /¢£0 OF 2006 ER Arun Kumar Saxena, son of Late Leeladhar Saxena, V Aku¢£§§§3ésid€nt n4 of 504B, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. Vs RESPONDENT‘; z Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samm, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, re sident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF> THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS [CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION‘S) l ORDER‘SI IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. V W PETITION ' JiLQlimCmQHBLQf.”AQQLQAIQEEQHHATI'SGARH 1 BILA$PUB. SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, C.J. PETITIONER W.P. NO.1429 OF 2006 Yashwant Singh, son of Late Rameshwar Daya! Singh, aged 66 years, resident of R—6, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. Versus $ RESPONDENT PETITIONER Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident' of 445, 'Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipurv W.P. NO.1 430 OF 2006 Arun Kumar Saxena, son of Late Leeladhar Saxena aged 55 years resident of 504B, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. RESPONDENT TITIONER RESPONDENT Versus Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445. Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur, W.P. NO.1431 OF 2006 D.N, Shukla, sonof Shri Hariman Shukia, aged 46 years. resident of 566, Priyadarshini Nagar, Ring Road No.2 Raipuru Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. Versus W.P. NO.1 432 OF 2006 PETITIONER Nanakram Wadhwani, son of Late Sukhuram Wadhwani. aged about 41 years, resident of D—17, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur. Versus . . RESPONDENT Priyadarshini Grih Nirmaan Sahkari Samiti, Raipur, through its President Shri Rajesh Shrivastava, resident of 445, Priyadarshini Nagar, Raipur Present Shri B.P. Sharma. learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Bhishma Kinger. learned counsel for the respondent. "‘ (ORAL ORDER) (Passed on 23" March, 2006) inthe light of the judgment of the Division Bench o this Court in W.P. No.141 7/2006. these writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Chef stice Roshan . \ f i Ju