IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 302 OF 2011 SHRI VIJAYKUMAR KASHINATH FADKE PILIENKAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER AND 3 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. P. K. Gude, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. N. Joshi, Advocate for respondent no.1. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 29th August, 2011 P.C. 1. In this petition, the petitioner challenges the action initiated by respondent no.1 under Section 13(2) and measures taken under Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. We are of the view that the petitioner has an adequate alternate remedy by way of application to be made to the Administrative Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act. Consequently, we decline to exercise the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. 2. In case of Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev and others V/s State of Maharashtra, 2011(2) SCC 782, the Supreme Court in similar circumstances has held that the Writ Petition should not be entertained. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*