Writ Petition is) No. 40L /2oo7 PETITION ER 47m. Krusbani Ekka, aged about 38 years, doughi‘er of Shri Premchand Ekko, Assistant Teacher, Governmenf Primary Schooi — Pandripani, Kunkuri, Jashpur, resident of Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Tribal Wetfore, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantratay, Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribat Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 225/:OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION / ORDEROF LIKE NATURE ETC . BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) HI$H COURT OF CHHATTI56ARH AT BILA5PUR W. P. (5) No. 401 of 2007 Pefifioner : 5m1'. Krusbani Ekku Versus Respondents : Smfz of Chhm'fisgarh and mo‘l’her $8: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surish K. Agniho'h'i, J Mr. Akshay Yadnv, Advocate for the pefiTioner. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Governmem Advocnfe for fhe respondenfs/Sfafe. O R D E R (Passzd on 23" day of January, 2007) The following order of ‘rhe Cour? is passed by satish K. Agnihofri. J. J 1. Learned counsel appearing for fine petitioners as well as learned Governmenl Advocofe appearing for The mspondenfs/Sfafe jointly submit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of in W. Pt (s) 5976 of 2006 (Suéiil Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7m November, 2006. They further! submit that the question of law involved is also the some. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7n. November, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to oosts. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri ,v" Judge Boblu