IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5310 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 2.9.2011 M/s S.P. Engineering Works & others ......Petitioner(s) Versus Karuna Narula ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Jagjot Singh Lalli, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is tenants' revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 21.7.2011 whereby application filed by them under Section 10 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, has been dismissed. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Harjit Singh Uppal v. Anup Bansal, JT 2011 (6) SC 236, the aforesaid order is appealable. In view of the aforesaid, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to avail an appropriate remedy before the Appellate Authority in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Needless to say that if the petitioners file any such appeal and also file an application for condonation of delay, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. September 2, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE