^t t DIViSiON BENCH SON'SLE S lun EV GUPTA, C.J. & HR1 SUNIL KUMAR SSNHA. J, .P.OTUNo. 5184 of 2007 In the matter of Manikankana Ray Versus Director, Nationat Institute Technology, Raipur(C.G.) Present: Shri N. K. Agrawa!, learned Depuiy Advocate General for the State. Shri S.S. Rajput, learned counsel for National Instltute of Technology, Raipur. rth The following order of the Court was passed by Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petitlon came to be registered cn the letters sent bysome of thestudents of the Nationai Institute of Technology, Raipur being aggrieved ofthe order dated 20-08-2007, passed by the Director of the National Institute of Technoiogy, Raipur, declaring the boycott of the classes by the students as iilegal and ctosing the institute for an indefinite period wit'n further direction to the hostellers to vapate the hoste! wlthin 24 hours of the passing of the said order; w 3. Aiona with the counter affldavit filed on behalf of the State and National institute of Technology, Ralpur, a copy ofthe letter sent by the Director, National instltute of Technology, Raipur has been annexed wherein it has been categorically mentioned that in the meeting held between the students and the management of the institute, the differences have been settied and as the students withdrew the boycott of the classes the management of the institute has also withdrawn thelr order dated 20.08.2007. 4. In view of the above developments during the pendency of the writ petition, vi/e are of the opinion that no further monitoring of the matter in this writ petitlon, novi/, is required. 5. The writ petition, thus, stands disposed of. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu