Q§ Iv$ @ In the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur WP(S)— / Q i3 /2011 q Petitioner Pramod Kumar Bakde, Aged 44 Yrs. S/o N. M. Bakde I 13, Rajiv Nagar, PO Shankar Nagar, Raipur Petition Under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India Versus Respondents 1./State of Chhattisgarh, thro’ Secretary, s Deptt. Of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Raipur. 95 (3M Z Managing Director, 90$ Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipmzn 3 ' /B0ard, Raipur. @égaqsx 3. Deputy Commissioner cum C ti ’ Census Charge Officer, §$€§f Nagar Palika HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 473 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'I‘ITUI'ION OF ' INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. PETHIUNER Pramod Kumar Bakde. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Present: Shri Raja Shanna. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, D¢puty Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. I. Shri Vikmm Singly Advocate for therespondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 12“ day ofMay, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue oftransfer, involved in this petition, has come to an end on account ofthe ofthe fact that census work is over. Thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. However, the petitioner wishes to make a representation to the respondent authorities for other consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no obj eetion. 3. Since there is no prayer for grant of consequential beneftts in the petition, it is not necessary to grant any pennission to make a representation. Ii‘the petitioner wants to make a representation, he is free to do so. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation, if so advised. WWWF¢I M‘- Sd/- i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge