IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 18TH MAGHA 1932 CRP.No. 895 of 2007() -------------------------------- CC.298/73/KRA of TALUK LAND BOARD, KOTTARAKKARA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): ---------------------------------- A.JUBYRIA BEEVI, PANAYIL VEEDU, KADAMKODU, SAMBRAMAM, VATTATHAMARA P.O., KUMMIL VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE SRI.DILIP MOHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM. 2. TALUK LAND BOARD, KOTTARAKKARA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), KOLLAM. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, KUMMIL VILLAGE. 4. TAHSILDAR, KOTTARAKARA. 5. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, UDIYANNOOR VEEDU, VELIYAM, KOTTARAKARA. R1 TO R4 BY SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/02/2011 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYPASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON IA. NO.2515 & 1517/2008 IN CRP. NO.895/2007 DISMISSED 07/02/2011 SD/- M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.A. O JUDGE tss M.N. KRISHNAN,J. ........................................... C.R.P.NO.895 OF 2007 ............................................. Dated this the 7th day of February, 2011. O R D E R This revision is preferred against the order of the Taluk Land Board, Kottarakkara, dated 12th July, 2007. The revision petitioner before me is one Jubyria Beevi. Jubyria Beevi is claiming property having an extent of 50 cents in Sy.No.442/8/20 of Kadakkal village, Kottarakkara. According to her, she had obtained the said property by way of a gift deed dated 16.6.1986 from her father who in turn obtained the property from Muhammed Haneefa and Muhammed Haneefa obtained the property during the year 1956. So, the revision petitioner is claiming 50 cents of property comprised in Sy.No.442/8/21 through Chellappan Asari. So, the contention is that it has nothing to do with the declarant. The Taluk Land Board had considered it in the second paragraph of page 3 of its order which reads as follows: Regarding the contention No.2, the gift deed is comprised in Sy.No.442/8/21. The Taluk Land Board had not declared any land from the above survey number as surplus land. So : 2 : C.R.P.NO.895 OF 2007 the definite finding of the Taluk Land Board is with respect to the effect that no property comprised in Sy.No.442/8/21 had been declared as surplus land. When it is so, naturally the present revision petitioner cannot have any grievance for the reason that she is claiming the property in that survey number. 2. Therefore no further orders are necessary on the same, but I make it very clear that in any event the Taluk Land Board is attempting to get into the property owned and possessed by this petitioner, she must be heard before a final order is made. Disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. cl : 3 : C.R.P.NO.895 OF 2007 M.N. KRISHNAN, J. ........................................... M.A.C.A/A.S/C.R.P.NO.OF ............................................. 17th January, 2011. J U D G M E N T/O R D E R