IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2536 of 2011 ====================================================== Hira Choudhary, S/o late Aklu Choudhary, Address- C/o Sri Sukhnandan Prasad, Brahamdeo Bhawan, near Atta Chakki, Mohalla B Area Mithapur, P.S. Jakkanpur, P.O. G.P.O., District- Patna .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Beverages Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan-II, 1st. Floor, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna-1, 2. Sri Rajit Punhani, S/o name not known to the petitioner, Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan-II, 1st. Floor, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna-1, 3. Sri Satyendra Nath Srivastava, S/o name not known to the petitioner, General Manager, Human Resources and Administration, Bihar State Beverages Corporation Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan-II, 1st. Floor, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna-1, 4. Aditya Prasad S/o name not known to the petitioner, General Manager Finance, Bihar State Beverages Corporation Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan-II, 1st. Floor, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna-1, 5. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, Advocate For the Opp.Parties : Mr. Sunil Kumar Alias Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 4 12-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Bihar State Beverages Corporation. The petitioner alleges that the opposite parties have violated the order dated 12.5.2011 passed in CWJC No. 8444/2011 and thus liable to be tried for contempt. The said order was an interim order by which the operation of the impugned orders dated 11.3.2011 and 17.3.2011 had been stayed by this Court. By the first of the 2 impugned orders direction was issued to recover certain amounts from the salary of the petitioner and by the subsequent order his deputation in the Beverages Corporation was cancelled and he was repatriated to his parent organization. It is admitted that the petitioner has already joined in his parent organization before the interim order was passed and subsequently he was directed by the opposite parties to submit his relieving order and upon his so submitting he was permitted to join on 28.7.2011. In the meantime, on 27.7.2011 the final order has been passed in the writ petition by which the order dated 11.3.2011 has been upheld whereas the order dated 17.3.2011 had already been withdrawn by the respondent Corporation. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is of the view that although there was some delay on the part of the opposite parties in complying with the order dated 12.5.2011, but they have not willfully violated the same. The contempt application is, therefore, dismissed. S.Pandey/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)