IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30402 of 2009 Ram Sundar Yadav Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 4. 8.12.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 8.7.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Aurangabad in Cr. Revision No.67 of 2009 whereby the learned court below has rejected the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner on 13.5.2009 for leading evidence. It is the case of the petitioner that although the documents were filed before the Executive magistrate but were not marked as exhibits. The petitioner thus sought to lead the same by way of additional evidence at revisional stage and which prayer has been rejected for want of jurisdiction. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and having perused the impugned order, no interference is called for in the order passed by the learned court below. As according to the petitioner, the documents sought to be led by him as additional evidence before the Revisional Court are part of 2 the Executive Court proceedings, he may make reference to the said documents at the stage of final hearing of the revision application which admittedly is pending for adjudication before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, II, Aurangabad provided they form part of the Executive Court records. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)