IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2656 of 2007 1. SHASHI SHEKHAR KUMAR, SON OF SRI DUKHAN PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + P.O.- BABHANGAMA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 2. MANOJ KUMAR, SON OF SRI KAPIL DEO PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + P.O. – FATEHPUR, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 3. MD. PARWEZ ALAM, SON OF MD. ZIYA-UR- RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + P.O. RAJNI BABHANGAMA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA …. ……………..…………….. PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, I.A.S., SECRETARY, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. SRI RAJESH KUMAR, I.A.S., DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA 4. SRI KISHORI SAW, DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, MADHEPURA 5. SRI RAM SINGH, DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHEPURA 6. SRI BAMBESHWAR JHA, BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BIHARIGANJ BLOCK, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 7. SRI RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIHARIGANJ BLOCK, DISTRICT MADEHPURA 8. SMT. LALITA DEVI, MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT BABHANGAMA, BLOCK BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 9. SRI RAVINDRA RAM, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT BABHANGAMA, BIHARIGANJ BLOCK, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 10. LEENA KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR AT RPESENT POSTED AS SHIKSHA MITRA, GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL, BABHANGAMA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 11. CHANDAN PASWAN, SON OF SRI NAGESHWR PASWAN, AT PRESENT POSTED AS SHIKSHA MITRA, GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL BABHANGAMA, BLOCK BIHARIGANJ, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 12. RINKU KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI MUKESH KUMAR MUKUND, AT RPESENT POSTED AS SHIKSHA MITRA, PRIMARY SCHOOL BABHANGAMA, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA - 2 - 13. INDULA KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI SIYA RAM YADAV AT PRESENT POSTED AS SHIKSHA MITRA, PRIMARY SCHOOL FATEPUR, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA 14. MUKESH KUMAR, SON OF SRI NAWAL KISHORE YADAV AT PRESENT POSTED AS SHIKSHA MITRA, PRIMARY SCHOOL FATEHPUR, P.S. BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA……………….OPPOSITE PARTIES -------- 2. 09.02.2009 It appears that pursuant to the order of this Court, the representation of the petitioners has been considered and a speaking order has been passed which is Annexure-A to the show cause of the opposite party no.5, District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the District Magistrate, Madhepura has not given proper consideration to the grievances raised in the representation. In that view of the matter, if the petitioners are aggrieved, they will be at liberty to challenge the said order of the District Magistrate in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. So far as this contempt proceeding is concerned, this Court is not persuaded to proceed further with the same and the same is dropped. The application is dismissed. B.T. (J.N.Singh, J.)