IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:11676 of 2005 Between: Kukatla Kotaiah, s/o. Ajaiah, R/o.Door No. 3-192, Chilakapadu Village, Santhanutalapudu Mandal. Prakasham District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (MDL-IIA)DEPTT,, HYDERABAD. 2 The Electuion Commissioner, Government of Andhra Pradesh, HYDERABAD. 3 The Joint Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (MDL-IIA)DEPTT,, HYDERABAD. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, Prakasham Dist. 5 Mr. Reveri George alias Chinna George, S/o. Dayanandam R/o. Chilakapadu Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasham Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.RAVINDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus by calling the entire records leading for issuance of the impugned proceedings of the respondent No.3 i.e., RDO, Ongole and set aside G.O.Ms.No.129, dated 27.04.2005. At the hearing, Sri M.Ravindra Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.Nos.14907 and 14908 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JULY, 2008. kvni