IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-30189 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.10.2010 ... Sumit Kumar @ Rishu ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Munish Behl, Advocate for the petitioner ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner alongwith others has snatched ` 9,500/- and mobile from the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. However, from the perusal of the file it is revealed that name 'Sheesha' has been mentioned. It is during the course of investigation only, that the said fact can be ascertained. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 12.10.2010 Judge chugh