- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1699 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1699 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1699 OF 2007 Jagadish Khadilkar ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Rajiv Patil i/b Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade for the Petitioner Mr.J.B.Shabwani for Respondent No.2 Mr.Y.S.Shinde A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 25,2008 : JULY 25,2008 : JULY 25,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the second respondent states that written submissions filed by the petitioners have been permitted to be filed on record by the learned Trial Judge, when the said written submissions were tendered by the learned Public Prosecutor. In view of this statement, it is not necessary to consider the legality and validity of the impugned order. As the written submissions have already been taken on record by the learned Judge, it is obvious that he will consider the same while deciding the application for discharge. Hence, no further direction is required to be issued. Writ Petition is disposed of. Subject to what is stated above, the impugned order is not interfered with. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE