1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5415 OF 2005 Assocciation of Marriage Counsellors Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/b Mrs.Vinita V. Bakre-Shastry for the Petitioners. Mr.R.D.Rane, GP for the State. ... CORAM :F.I.REBELLO & CORAM :F.I.REBELLO & CORAM :F.I.REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 8th September, 2005. P.C. : 1. This is a Petition by the Association of Marriage Counsellors and others. The main grievance is that their representation of pay scales was not forwarded by this Court on its administrative side to the Shetty Commission which is looking in the issue of pay scales of 2 non-judicial officers in the subordinate Courts. Learned counsel also pointed out that in the meantime, the term of the Shetty Commission has come to an end. 2. It is only as and when the report of the Shetty Commission, in so far as non-judicial officers are concerned, if accepted and pursuant to that pay scales are enhanced or increased and if there is no enhancement or increase in the pay scale of the Petitioners herein, will they have a right or locus in the matter. As such it will not be possible for this Court at this stage to grant any of the reliefs prayed by them. We grant liberty to the Petitioners to move this Court in the event they are excluded from the benefits of any recommendations, if accepted by the State Government, in so far as the staff of the subordinate Courts are concerned. With the above directions, the Petition stands disposed of.