1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.786/1987. Padam Chand. VERSUS Mathura Prasad. 04.02.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.D.K.Soral, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.Goyal, for the respondent. ***** During the course of hearing, it was revealed that the petitioner Padam Chand had filed an application on 05.09.1995 which is available in the filed o S.B.Civil First Appeal No.140/1986 (Durga Vs. Mathura Prasad) wherein Padam Chand has stated as follows:- "उपरोक् त शीषर्क के ूकरण में सिवनय िनवेदन है िक ूाथȸ िनगरानी गुजार अपनी िनगरानी मे कोई अिमम कायर्वाही नहीं चाहता है तथा उसे वािपस लेता है कृप् या िनगरानी वािपस िकये जाने िक अनुमित ूदान कर खािरज िकया जावें । ूत् याथȸ को खचȶ की आपित् त नहीं हैं ।" This application is signed by both the parties i.e. the petitioner-objector as well as the decree holder. Based upon the said averments in the above application which was filed before this court, this court 2 vide its order dated 08.11.1995 dismissed the First Appeal No.140/1986 as having become infructuous. The order dated 08.11.1995 reads as follows:- “It is stated by the learned counsel for the parties that the compromise has already been arrived at and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and an application has been filed incorporating the terms and conditions of the compromise and in view of the compromise, possession of the suit premises has been handed over to the respondents. The first appeal has since become infructuous and is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. The parties to bear their own costs.” In the light of the above facts, this revision petition filed by Padam Chand, the objector, who is reported to have handed over the possession to the decree holder, is dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application also stands dismissed. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.