:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2662 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2662 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2662 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (ST) NO.387 OF 2007 (ST) NO.387 OF 2007 (ST) NO.387 OF 2007 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2305 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2305 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2305 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2059 OF 2006 NO.2059 OF 2006 NO.2059 OF 2006 Satpal Jain ..Appellant Vs. Glasstech Industries (I) Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents and ors. Mr.D.H.Mehta with Mr.B.H.Vyas for the Appellant. Mr.Vishal Moghilkar i/b.Mulla & Mulla for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.G.Deshpande for Respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER,2007 : 23RD NOVEMBER,2007 : 23RD NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof as well as affidavit-in-reply to the Notice of Motion. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 175 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)