IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6444 of 2010 RAJGIR YADAV S/O LATE MAUJE YADAV R/O VILL.- MINAIH, P.S.- SAKRI, DISTT.- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, MADHUBANI 3. THE SPECIAL OFFICER-CUM-LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MADHUBANI 4. THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, MINISTRY OF SHIPPING, ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI For the Petitioner : Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate. For the Union : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, CGC. For NHAI : M/s N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Sunil Kumar-2, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.K. Priyadarshi, AC to AAG-3. ----------- 03. 16.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the raiyat, whose lands have been acquired for widening N.H.-57. He has accepted the compensation amount determined by the competent authority but he is disputing the valuation fixed by the competent authority. 3. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Additional Collector, Madhubani, who is the Arbitrator appointed by the Central Government in terms of the provisions contained in Sub-Section-(5) of Section-3G of the National Highways Act, 1957. The learned Arbitrator should consider the request to revise the amount of compensation filed by the petitioner, as early as possible, in any case within six months from the date of receipt of the request/reference made by the petitioner along with a copy of this order before him. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)