IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** 1. CR No.4168 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2011 Leela Krishan . . .Petitioner Versus Roshan Lal and another . . . Respondents ***** 2. CR No.5462 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2011 Roshan Lal . . .Petitioner Versus Leela Krishan . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Jaspreet Singh, Advocate, for Mr.B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner in CR No.4168 of 2009 for the respondent in CR No.5462 of 2009 Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents in CR No.4168 of 2009 for the petitioner in CR No.5462 of 2009 ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This order shall dispose of two Civil Revisions namely, CR No.4168 of 2009 titled as Leela Krishan Versus Roshan Lal and another and CR No.5462 of 2009 titled as Roshan Lal Versus Leela Krishan. Learned counsel for the tenant (Leela Krishan) stated at the bar that both the revision petitions have become infructuous as he had already handed over vacant possession of the demised premises to the landlord(s). This statement is accepted by learned counsel for the landlord(s). In view thereof, both the revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of another connected case. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 06, 2011 JUDGE Vivek