IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6969 of 2009 FULMANI DEVI, Wife of Nageshwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Gulab Bigha, P.O.- P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) :--- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 3. The S.D.O., Aurangabad. 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Aurangabad. 5. The Block Development Officer, Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Uton Umga, Block- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 7. Smt. Binda Kumar, Wife of Indradeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Gulab Bigha, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 8. Smt. Kanti Devi, the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Utan Umga, P.O.+P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad (Bihar):--Respondents. ----------- 02. 23.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Sevika. Her appointment was indirectly challenged by respondent no.7 in C.W.J.C.No. 6464 of 2007 which was disposed of by a Bench of this Court under orders dated 18.08.2008, Annexure-4 directing the District Magistrate to consider the representation of Respondent No.7. In compliance of the direction contained in order dated 18.8.2008, Annexure-4 the District Magistrate has passed order dated 28.02.2009, Annexure-7 and thereunder the appointment of the petitioner as Anganwadi Sevika has been terminated. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although she wanted to intervene in the proceeding which was taken in the light of the orders of this Court dated 18.08.2008, Annexure-4 but her request to intervene in the proceeding was refused and without hearing her the order dated 28.02.2009, Annexure-7 has been passed terminating her appointment. 4. Let the petitioner challenge the order dated 28.02.2009, Annexure-7 before the concerned Divisional Commissioner who should issue notice to Smt. Binda Kumari and after service of notice - 2 - on her proceed with the matter in accordance with law and remand the matter to the District Magistrate as it is evident from the order dated 28.02.2009 itself that the same has been passed without hearing the petitioner. Appropriate orders in accordance with law be passed by the Divisional Commissioner as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of filing of the appeal by the petitioner. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha, J.)