IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 9TH AUGUST 2011 / 18TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21622 of 2011(C) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SARI ANTONY.A., WIFE OF JOSEPH JOHN, AGED 32 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT C M U P SHCOOL, THOZHIYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE-680003. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680503. 5. THE CORPORATE MANAGER(RECEIVER), MALABAR INDEPENDENT SYRIAN CHURCH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY THOZHIYOOR,THRISSUR-680520. BY SRI. V. VIJULAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.21622/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONER DTD. 28.10.05. EXT. P1(a) : COPY OF G.O.(Rt) No.709/09/GE OF GOVT. DTD. 12.2.09. EXT. P2 : COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONER DTD. 14.7.06. EXT. P3 : COPY OF PROCEEDINGS OF MANAGER DTD. 13.9.06. EXT. P3(a) : COPY OF ORDER No.3339/06/L.DIS. OF Assistant Educational Officer DTD. 3.11.06. EXT. P4 : COPY OF ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF PETITIONER DTD. 9.2.07. EXT. P5 : COPY OF REVISION FILED BEFORE GOVT. DTD. 19.10.09. EXT. P6 : COPY OF G.O.(P) 31/06/GE OF GOVT. DTD. 19.1.06. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21622 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay in disposal of Ext.P5 revision petition which is pending before the 1st respondent. It is a case where the petitioner's initial appointment has been approved as evident from Ext.P1 order. But, subsequent appointments made as per Exts.P2, P3 and P4 have not been approved so far. The petitioner has filed a consolidated revision before the Government as per Ext.P5. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Ext.P5, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the matter. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp