g<~——'-?—"aF ^^iy^ (^^} ^""^ ^.^.-.-^ssi^2-5'. p^.^s^'--^—" l......^-<<"' SiN6LE18ENSH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No^3 ^^"72005 PETITIONER /: Shankardas Banjara, s/o. Mahetara Ram Banjara, are 38 years, r/o. Village Chandeli, P.S. Lalpur, Tah. Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS Kh^^., ^... ^ .-T^ \Y ^.'.f1 ^ y^ Vo.v v ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deptt. of Food and Civil Supplies, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^3. The Branch Manager, "Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank" Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) /A. The Branch Manager, Seva Sahakari Samiti, Guruvinedabri, Tah. Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY PROHIBITION AND ANY OTHER WRIT /ORDER/DIRECTION. XI-HC-22 ^^r '^TraT^zT. ^Til^^i4»I^TOy ..s^..ssfs/o~s 'RPMT^W^ Wt 200 •tq^r- sn^T^r ^ich 3?n^r 5h<-<icr) ^fia_ lil -^/ ^5^ ^^' sn^T'^^T^RTri^f 8-12-2005 : Shri Vivek Sharma/ counsel for.the Shri Sandeep Dubey,Govt., Advoc^ Heard. .. Leamed counsei for the petitic •petitJQnernas been acquitted'and furthe consider the case of the petitioner for .reir been dorie by tne Bank. Learned couRsei submitted bythe petitioner on various ocjcasions, but thesam'e ,have not been CQnsidered. - . '. , Learned counsel for the State sui directed to make a representation be' authoritiesafresh and.ifsuch representa' consldered and decided. Having considered anci without merits of the case; in the opinion; of thi sen^ed if a direction is given -to the representstion. Taising his grievances be respondents alongwith a copy of the petiti of three weeks from today and on sucr competent authority of the respondents s nnerits in accordance v^ith iaw as eany period of three months from the date of made oiear that if any grievance stiii rem^ remeay avasiaoie unaer tne law. Vvith the aforesaid observations, tr this stage with the aforesaid liberty. Certified copy as per ruies; chS^k<1<fl'1 14S^<vii "? 'fe^ ipal^K ^3?f^RW^f iDetiitoenr ^te for the State. |ner submits that tnough the ^r the Goliector has directed to [statement but the same has not [submits Ihat the representations |)mits that the petitioner may be |ore the concerned competent lion is made, tne same sh'ali be ^xp.ressing an^ opinion on the ^ Court, ends of justice wiii. be ipetitioner to make a detaiied fore; the competent authority of ]pn and this order within a period representation being fiied; the hail dec.ide the same on its own |as p.ossibie preferabiy wit'nin a receipt :of representation. it is Bins, the petitioner may'avaii the |is petition stanas disposed of'at Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge n .0 40 [^ ^Ra^