IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.156 of 2011 SURESH PASWAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 4. 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this court had directed that the vehicle in question could be released on furnishing bank guarantee. He submits that adequate surety along with a bank guarantee of 50,000/- has been furnished. He further submits that in view of the admitted position that surety has been furnished, the respondents ought to have released the vehicle. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent No.2, District Forest Officer is directed to comply with the order of this court without any further delay. Let a copy of this order be communicated through fax to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger for its communication to respondent No. 2, at the cost of the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. Nitesh ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)