IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.12175 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. Nandi Vardha. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The petitioner has already made representations to the second respondent vide Annexure A-6 dated 03.09.2003 and Annexure A-7 dated 09.11.2003. These representations have not been decided till date by the respondents. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider and decide the representations made by the petitioner within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. The writ petition stands disposed of No. costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.