IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 1879 of 2008. Decided on: 25.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Chaman Lal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral). The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he has been appointed as Beldar, he had been discharging the duties of Surveyor. The fact of the matter is that the petitioner has failed to place any tangible evidence or material on record to substantiate his contention that he had been working as Surveyor. Even if it is assumed hypothetically that the petitioner had been working as Surveyor, the post of Supervisor is required to be filled- up as per Recruitment and Promotion Rules. Since the petitioner 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - has failed to substantiate that he had been working as Surveyor, there is no illegality in the office order dated 22nd September, 2007. 2. Accordingly, in view of the above discussion, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. February 25, 2011. (sck).