IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7897 of 2009 1. PRAVIN KUMAR, SON OF SAHDEO RAJAK, R/V MANIARCHAK, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 2. RANJAN PASWAN, SON OF WAKIL PASWAN, R/V MANIARCHAK, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 3. ANGESH KUMAR, SON OF PHUNAI PASWAN, R/V BOCHAHI, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 4. SADANAND KUMAR, SON OF SRI SAHESHWAR DAS, R/V BOCHAHI, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 5. USHA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF SRI SAHESHWAR DAS, R/V BOCHAHI, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 6. KABIR KUMAR, SON OF SRI BAGESHWAR PASWAN, R/V CHAMANGARH, P.S. NAYA RAM NAGAR, DISTRICT MUNGER. 7. KANHIYA LAL PASWAN, SON OF SRI SARYU PASWAN, R/V BOCHAHI, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 8. AWADESH KUMAR, SON OF SRI LAKHAN PASWAN, R/V BHARAT CHOUKI, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 9. PREMJIT CHANDRA, SON OF SRI BIDHU SEKHAR PRASAD, R/V MAHESHPUR, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. 10. ASHISH KUMAR, SONO OF RAM CHARAN PASWAN, R/V SHOMPUR, P.S. HAVELI KHARAGPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER. 11. RANDHIR KUMAR, SON OF SRI RAMPATI SAH, R/V BELA, P.S. PALIGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA. 12. RAJIV KUMAR, SON OF SRI ARJUN DAS, R/V MAHESHPUR, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER------PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE HOME COMMISSIONER, BIHAR PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE I.G., B.M.P.BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE S.P., BHAGALPUR. 6. THE S.P.BHOJPUR. 7. THE S.P. NALANDA. 8. THE S.P., MUNGER. 9 THE S.P., BAGHA. 10. THE S.P., PATNA. 11. THE COMMANDENT B.M.P.-20 DUMRAO, DISTRICT BUXAR----RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioners : Mr. Ibrahim Kabir, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A. Amanullah, S.C.-XVII, Advocate. ----------- 02. 14.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners applied for the selection on the post of constable in response to Advertisement No. 01 of 2009 and 02 of - 2 - 2009. They participated in the selection process and faired well to their satisfaction, yet have not been called for appointment. They apprehend foul play at the instance of inferior authorities while conducting the selection process. 3. Let the petitioners represent before the Chairman of the Selection Board, who should consider the same in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of its receipt. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)