mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.860 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.995 of 2004 Tejsingh Baid .. Plaintiff versus Shri Rawatmal Sohanlal Banthia & ors .. Defendants ... Mr.S.C. Naidu i/b M/s.C.R.Naidu & Co. for the plaintiff/ applicant. Mr.Shailesh Shah i/b T.N.Tripathi for the defendant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED :15th July 2009 P.C:- 1. Not on board. Taken up on board at the request of the parties. Heard forthwith. 2. Counsel for the parties state that the amendment sought by this chamber summons of the amendment are the same as are in Chamber Summons no.1333 of 2008. Hence for the reasons recorded in the reasoned order passed today in Chamber Summons no.1333 of 2008, this chamber summons is also allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- as condition precedent. Costs shall be paid to Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority or at the discretion of the plaintiff to Kirtikar Law Library within one week. 3. Amendment shall be carried out within two weeks. (D.G. KARNIK, J)