HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.31021 of 2010 Date: February 7, 2011 Between: Rutherford Baptist Church, Represented by its President Suddala Ramaiah, R/o.Hanamkonda, Warangal District … Petitioner And The State of A.P., represented by its Station House Officer, Subedari Police Station, Hanamkonda, Warangal District and others … Respondents Order: Petitioner, a church represented by its President, seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.1, Station House Officer, Subedari Police Station, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, in not taking any action on complaints dated 04-07-2010, 06-08-2010 and 07-11-2010 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated that on 02-01-2010 and 03-03-2010 the executive committee of the petitioner-church met, discussed removal of previous pastor by name Sri S.Daniel and removed him as such and appointed new pastor by name Rev.Gaddam Mathew Kumar Sen. It is stated that petitioner made aforesaid complaints to the first respondent stating that one Sri K. Manikyam and others abused the committee members as well as church members with un-parliamentary words and snatched away the offerings given by the congregation and requested to take necessary action. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of making such complaints, no action has been taken. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents-Police. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on obtaining instructions, states that no complaints as alleged by the petitioner are filed before the Station House Officer, Subedari Police Station, but representations dated 23-05-2010 and 26-05-2010 were filed before the Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Warangal Town, which were sent to the Circle Inspector of Police, Subedari for necessary action. It is stated that the Circle Inspector of Police enquired the matter with the committee members as well as church members and during enquiry it is revealed that the allegations of the petitioner are false and Sri K. Manikyam did not abuse the committee members and church members as alleged. From the aforesaid written instructions, it appears, based on the representations which were filed before the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, investigation has been made and conclusions are arrived at to the effect that the allegations made by the petitioner are false. As much as investigation has been made on the representations made by the petitioner, it cannot be said that no action has been taken by respondents-Police. Hence, no relief, as sought by the petitioner can be granted. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, it would be open to avail remedy available under Section 200 Cr.P.C. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) February 7, 2011 MRR