THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1905 of 2004 JUDGMENT: On the basis of a report given by the de facto complainant, who was examined as P.W-1, the Sub- Inspector of Police, Amberpet Women Police Station, registered a case and after investigation, filed a charge sheet against the first respondent herein, who is arrayed as A-1, and the second respondent herein-A-2, who is the alleged second wife of A-1 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 494 IPC and the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hyderabad, East and North, Ranga Reddy District, has taken the same on file as C.C.No.1583 of 1998. During the course of trial, on behalf of the prosecution, the de facto complainant got herself examined as P.W.1 and five more witnesses i.e., P.Ws.2 to 6 were examined and Exs.P-1 and P-10 were marked. On behalf of the accused, none was examined but, Exs.D-1 and D-2 were marked. The learned Magistrate having analysed the entire evidence on record, came to the conclusion that the accused are not guilty of the said offences with which they are charged and accordingly by his judgment, dated 13.09.2004, acquitted them. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. The State which filed the said C.C. before the Court below has not chosen to challenge the order of acquittal of the accused passed by the Court below and hence, the petitioner, who was examined as P.W-1 filed this Revision invoking the jurisdiction of the Court under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. Further, it should be remembered that as this is a Revision against the order of acquittal of the accused, the scope of the Revision is very much restricted. Even if this Court ultimately holds that respondents 1 and 2 herein- accused are guilty of the offences with which they are charged, this Court can only remand the matter to the Court below for fresh disposal, but cannot convert the said finding of acquittal into conviction. In those circumstances, I see no merits in this Criminal Revision Case and the same is accordingly dismissed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA 24th March 2011 DR