1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 515 OF 2010 Mrs. Kamla Arun Zare ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. Bhushan B. Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.D. Godbharle, A.P.P. for respondents ..... CORAM: S.B. DESHMUKH & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 16TH JULY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 We heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 3 The petitioner has filed this writ petition in this Court with the following prayers;- 2 “A) Writ petition may kindly be allowed with cost. B) The respondent No. 1 and 2 be directed to get the matter/ complaint of theft made by petitioner to investigate within a stipulated period of reasonable time. C) Any other relief for which petition is entitled for may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner. “ 3 This petition is filed on 10.12.2009. In response to the notice of this Court, affidavit in reply is filed on behalf of the respondents. It is sworn in by Sunil Bajirao Lahane, Police Sub Inspector, Begumpura police station, Aurangabad. Alongwith the writ petition, copies of complaint and order passed by the learned J.M.F.C. are annexed. It appears that R.C.C. No. 1393 of 2009 was filed by the present petitioner before the Court of learned J.M.F.C. Aurangabad on 27.7.2009. Then the complaint was made over to Court No.13 i.e. learned J.M.F.C. Aurangabad on 27.7.2009. On 27.7.2009, the court concern directed the Registry to list the matter for verification. When the matter was placed for order. On 5.8.2009, the learned J.M.F.C. passed order directing the police Inspector of Begumpura police station to investigate the matter under section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. The complaint of the petitioner was under Section 379 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. The occurrence of the incident, according to the petitioner, took place on 10.7.2009. We have seen the details of occurrence narrated by the petitioner in her complaint R.C.C. No. 1393 of 2009. We have also 3 seen the pleadings made in the present writ petition. 4 In view of the order passed by the learned J.M.F.C., directing the investigation in the occurrence, investigation was initiated and completed. Affidavit in reply filed by the State clarifies the entire situation. Counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly concedes that the investigation in view of the order passed by the learned J.M.F.C. has been completed. In view of the prayers made in the writ petition and affidavit in reply filed by the State, in our view, nothing remains to be adjudicated. Writ petition stands dismissed and disposed of. No costs. Rule discharged. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/