FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.462 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.845 OF 1976 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Prothonotary’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Ms.Tulip Misquita for applicant No.1(d)(iii). Mr.T.N.Subramaniam, Sr.Counsel a/w Leena Mirasel for respondent no.24. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 6TH JUNE, 2008 DATED: 6TH JUNE, 2008 DATED: 6TH JUNE, 2008 P.C.: . This Notice of Motion is taken out by the applicant-defendant No.1(d)(iii) seeking directions against respondent no.24 for making payment of balance amount of Rs.2,75,000/- as per the decree dated 28.1.1997. It appears, the suit was decreed in terms of the minutes of order on 28th January, 1997. Under the decree, according to the applicant, he was entitled for Rs.4,00,000/-, however, he was paid only Rs.1,25,000/- and hence he has made aforesaid prayer in the motion taken out by him on 27th February, 2008. To my specific query made to the learned counsel for the applicants as to what is basis for making such claim, she could not satisfy the court except submitting that the other similarly placed defendants received more than Rs.5,00,000/- under the very same decree. I perused the decree. The decree, in my opinion, does not show and even the learned counsel for the applicant could not point out as to why the applicant claims balance amount of Rs.2,75,000/-. In the circumstances prayer in the motion cannot be granted and it is dismissed as such. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)