r» U^'J^^'v^v IN THE HIGH-EOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) ^ Contempt Case (0 No. ol^ a> / 2011. (Arising out of order dated 25.04.11 passed in writ petition (S) No. 604/2010 by Hon'ble High Court.) PETITIONER: Gmja Bai Chouhan, wife of Late -:^)^' v Shivlal Chouhan, aged about 31 <^y ^:,\'i° ^'~ f vears. residence of villaee Hardi ^ ^'^y ^1''. \ years, residence of village Hardi Post .a^^^"^/^ Madwa, TahsU Dabra, District Janjgir- ^s^-^"^ ^eil^ T^ Chainpa, Chhattisgarh Presently posted as Peon at Govt. Naveen Girls Higher Secondary School, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Respondent (Contemnor) Versus Shri R.S.Chouhan, District Educadon Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1 7'^?F^'?3?";. .C-""'^ ^^ sii^i vi R-fi* '(Taff 3n^?T sFqNr Tumane "T5ET ^WM^, ^T:\\W\<c, [^ViWji. . c3^t- Co^e/C 3 ^- 2c)-yz,TM ^^^.^..-.^...^.^.^^................^^Q sn^r 'qsw (1pf3^^) ^TOR ^ffig sii^i <bl'4i<rf41'1 HlH<v?t ^f fs<^ •(N'^R ^i'affiinsii^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MohanlShrivastava, J. 01-08-2011 Shri C. J. K. Rao, counsel forfhe petitioner. hleard. This petition has been file(|l by the petitioner alleging willful disobedience of order dated 23-04^ 2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S.)No.604 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitiijiner submits that though petition was allowed in terms of order passed by (his Court in the case of San( Kumar & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh The petition was allowed vide \S. Others, (W.P.No.2125 of 2002), , regular pay scale has not been gra^ted to the petitioner, after lapse of three months. irder dated 25-04-2011. In the order, it has been mentioned that the petiljion is allowed in terms of the order passed in San( Kumar (supra), s|jbject to verification of facts. The petitioner, thereafter, submitted | representation on 31-05-2011. Considering that no specific time limif has been fixed in the order and that the Court had directed verification notice to the respondent, at this stag^. In view of foregoing, the petiti|3n is dismissed as pre-mature. It is, however, made clear that even ifl prescribed, orders of the Court are r^quired to be complied with, within a reasonable time. _L [)f facts, 1 am not inclinedto issue no specific time limit has been Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shr.vastava Judge •imrfhi^lN'ga'nsT, <I"I-IWIM—cs/i4o—2/2011—i ,50,000. .^