1 OSWP-1467-2011 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1467 OF 2011 Smt.Ankita Rele and anr. ...Petitioners Versus Indian Institute of Banking and Finance ...Respondent Mr.N.M.Ganguli for petitioners. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. September 2, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr.Ganguli, the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners claim that they were the employees of the respondent – Institute and they pray for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent – Institute to pay the legal dues including pensionary benefits. Mr.Ganguli also relied upon the decision in the case of Shri Anandi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandasjiswami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust and ors. Vs. V.R. Rudani and ors. [AIR 1989 SC 1607]. 2 OSWP-1467-2011 2. There is no averment in the petition memo that the respondent is an institute created / established under any statute and that even otherwise it is discharging any public duty. Mr.Ganguli submitted that the respondent – Institute is conducting examination for the banks. 3. In our opinion, there is no sufficient material placed before us in this petition to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution against the respondent. The petitioners’ remedy may be before any other appropriate Court. 4. The petition is, therefore, rejected as not maintainable. This order will not come in the way of the petitioners to initiate any other appropriate proceedings. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)