IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Revision No. 1595 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: July 25, 2011 Mandeep Singh and another …..Petitioners versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.H.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioners .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) In this revision petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 20th April, 2011 (Annexure P-3) passed by CJM, Muktsar Sahib whereby application of the petitioners for recording statements under section 313 Cr.P.C. afresh was rejected. Learned counsel submits that due to communication gap between the petitioners and their counsel, certain questions could not be correctly answered particularly question No.7. In view of same, statement under section 313 Cr.P.C. needs to be recorded afresh. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. A perusal of Annexures P-1 and P-2, however, shows that detailed statements were recorded by the court below under section 313 Cr.P.C. All the questions put to petitioners were answered. In reply to question No.7, petitioners clearly replied that they were innocent and were not entrusted with the alleged quantity of paddy as Crl.Revision No. 1595 of 2011 - 2 - the same was stored in open plinths and remained in custody of PSWC. On a question being put to learned counsel for the petitioners as to what stand the petitioner wanted to take in reply to said question, no clear answer is forthcoming. There appears to be no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed in limine. July 25, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2