AB 673/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Sri P C Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also hear d Shri B S Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Also perused the Case Diary. This application U/S 438 CrPC has been filed seeking anticipator y bail of the accused petitioner, namely, Md Mainuddin Ahmed @ Mainul Ali, appre hending his arrest in connection with Satgaon PS Case No. 11 of 2011 under Sec tion 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that while the informant was returning h ome through Satgaon Road, his car was obstructed by a group of boys and he was p hysically manhandled by them and a sum of Rs. 10,000/- was also snatched away fr om him. In the FIR, the name of the present accused has been mentioned. Besides this, the petitioner is from the same locality where the incident had ta ken place. The above apart, the learned Sessions Judge has also rejected th e bail prayer after perusal of the Case Diary. Having regard to the entire aspects of the matter, I am of the v iew that it is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the Bail Application stands rejected.