1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 78 of 2009 MANGI LAL RAO V/S LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR & ANR. Mr. DD CHITLANGI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 9.3.2009 HON'BLE SHRI DEEPAK VERMA,CJ. HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Unsuccessful petitioner of Writ Petition No. 2423/2003 decided by the learned Single Judge on 13.2.2007 by this intra court appeal challenging the said order on variety of grounds. Appellant was issued a charge-sheet under Clause 34 of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Workers Standing Order for the misconduct which ultimately resulted into order of punishment dt. 30.11.1996 imposing a penalty of dismissal from service with forfeiture of wages for the period of suspension except the subsistence allowance already paid. Two charges were levelled against appellant; (1) while working as conductor with the Corporation on a particular date on a bus plying between two places 28 passengers were found travelling without issuance of ticket to them by appellant, (2) the appellant along with his brother committed assaults. 2 The first ground was not established. The second ground was found to be proved on the strength of which his services came to be terminated. The said order was subject matter of challenge before the Industrial Tribunal. The Industrial Tribunal recorded a finding that enquiry was conducted in accordance with procedure prescribed in the Standing Order and as such was fair, and allegations levelled against appellant stood proved on the basis of evidence available on record. Against this award of the Tribunal appellant was before the learned Single Judge challenging the same under Article 226 and 227. Learned Single Judge after looking the matter from all angle came to the conclusion that there was no substance in the writ petition filed by the appellant. Against such dismissal, this writ appeal has been preferred. We have also examined the matter in detail from all angle but would only like to subscribe to the reasoning which has been adopted by the learned Single Judge. No case for interference has been made out. The appeal being devoid of any merit is dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. (DEEPAK VERMA),CJ. /Sushil/