IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2007 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 12912 OF 2007(K) PETITIONER: 1. M.K.ASAF ALI, MANAGING DIRECTOR, DIVINE MEDICAL CENTRE LTD., WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. DIVINE MEDICAL CENTRE LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENTS: 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. MUSTHAFA, S/O. KUNJUVAPPU, PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKODE VALAVU, POST MULLURKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. ALI, S/O. MOHAMMADKUTTY, PALATHINGAL HOUSE, VAZHAKKODE VALAVU, POST MULLURKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. MUSTHAFA, S/O. EBRAHIM, NAMBRATH HOUSE, VAZHAKKODE VALAVU, POST MULLURKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O. ALI, KOLOTHKULAM HOUSE, VAZHAKKODE VALAVU, POST MULLURKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. AKBAR, S/O. RAYANKUTTY, KOLOTHKULAM HOUSE, VAZHAKKODE VALAVU, POST MULLURKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. WP(C) 12912/2007 7. ABDUL NOUSHAD, SON HASSANAR, MOOLAYIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKODE VALAVU, POST MULLURKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJITH KUMAR KANGHINGHAT SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 12912/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 2.4.2007 LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 3.4.2007 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF TE FIR DATED 4.4.2007 REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KNC/- P.R. RAMAN & K. HEMA, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = == W.P.(C) NO. 12912 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2007. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. An interim direction has already been passed by this Court as per order dated 12.4.2007. Respondents have entered appearance and controverted the averments made in the writ petition by filing a counter affidavit and stated that they are not causing any obstruction. The same is recorded. Since a direction is issued by this Court to grant protection only if any obstruction caused, the same will not affect adversely any party so long as no obstruction is caused. No further orders are required. The interim direction already issued will continue. The writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) K. HEMA, (JUDGE) knc/-