IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATN, Cr.Misc. No.14960 of 2009 1. Rabindra C.P. Vavelkar, son of Late Charshandra alias Sarad Chandra Probo Navelkar, House No. 1231, Bainguuinium, Tiswadi, Goa. 2. Yashpal A. Raikar, son of Pradeep Khaunte alias Pradeep Khaunte, House No. 626, Near Kadamba Bus Depot, Porovorim, Bardez, Goa. 3. Smt. Fermeena Khaunte alias Fermeena P. Khaunte, wife of Pradeep Khaunte, House No. 626, Near Kadamba Bus Depot, Porovorim, Bardez, Goa. 4. Pradeep Khaunte alias Pradeep Khaunte, son of Janadan Khaunte, House No. 626, Near Kadamba Bus Depot, Porovorim, Bardez, Goa – petitioners. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Ram Prasad Mehta, son of late Lakhan Mahto, Narayanpur, PS Barbigha, District Sheikhpura. 3. Nageshwar Pandey, son of Late Jamuna Kant Pandey, resident of EC-4, Inderpuri, New Delhi – 110012 – opp. parties. … For the petitioners : None. For opp.parties 2 and 3 : Mr. Saket Tiwary, Mr. Sanjeev Dubey and Mr. Alok Pandey, Advocates. 5 9.12.2009 This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 8.5.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sheikhpura in Complaint Case No. 102C/2008 by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the offences under sections 406, 420/34 of the Penal Code. In this case opposite party-complainant has appeared and filed an affidavit stating therein that both the parties have compromised the matter and the complainant has no grievance against the petitioners-accused in this case. A joint compromise petition has also been filed in the court below, the certified copy of which has been annexed to the affidavit filed on 29.6.2009. Considering the aforesaid facts and the fact that the parties do not want to pursue the matter and that the sections are compoundable, I quash the order, dated 8.5.2008 passed in Complaint case N. 102C/2008. 2 This application is, thus, allowed in terms of the compromise. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)