1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LPA NO. 255 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2790 OF 2008 (Parmatama Ek Sevak Sahakari Bank & Anr. vs. Assistant Registrar, Coop. Societies & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. SEPTEMBER 01, 2009. Heard Shri Tidke, learned counsel for the appellants and Shri Doifode, learned AGP for respondent No.1 and Shri Chahande, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Shri Tidke, learned counsel has attempted to point out that the order of learned Single Judge remanding the matter to the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies by issuing RRC is unsustainable as the remedy of filing revision under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, was available to the petitioner i.e. present Respondent No.2. Shri Doifode, learned AGP as also Shri Chahande, learned counsel for respective respondents have, however, pointed out that the order of learned Single Judge has been implemented and the Assistant Registrar has heard the parties again and passed the fresh order on 1.11.2008. A copy of said order dated 11.11.2008 is produced before us. 2 Shri Tidke, learned counsel is also trying to point out some errors in the said order dated 11.11.2008. In the present facts, it is apparent that the appellant has to challenge the order dated 11.11.2008 before the competent forum and the grievance in relation to it cannot be gone into in present Letters Patent Appeal. Though the bank had auctioned the properties of Respondent No.2 after earlier RRC, it has been set aside by the learned Single Judge. The auction purchaser Shri Raja (present Respondent No.3) has not challenged the order of learned Single Judge further and has acquiesce in it. He was party before the Assistant Registrar in fresh proceedings and appears to have been heard before passing of fresh orders on 11.11.2008. In these circumstances, it is apparent that the present Letters Patent Appeal has become infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of. All the contentions and grounds raised by the appellant – Bank are kept open for consideration by appropriate forum. Needless to mention that the appellants can approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law in the matter. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.