1 cri-appi-27-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 27 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 17 OF 2010 Sumit Brijabihari Giri .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. P.A. Pol, P.P. for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. JANUARY 17, 2011. P.C. We have heard the applicant on the last date i.e. on 23/12/2010 when he was produced before us. We have explained to him that our order dated 13/10/2010 does not call for any reconsideration. It was submitted by him that there are some other important issues which are required to be dealt with, regarding the administration of jails and the infrastructure available within the premises for the welfare of the prisoners. He was assured that if such issues are raised by him and if the court would be 2 cri-appi-27-10 satisfied that they required consideration, a separate PIL petition would be registered on such a fresh application. He has not submitted any fresh application. This application does not survive and the same is hereby rejected. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)