^ 'w '^ w. APPLIGANTS AppliOz^fcs' ^i^^. ';llfe ^:.""; '- SinBleBenui INTI^HIG^C^tJttTOFCHHATTISG^ ChTlRevision -1^ /2004 -1) ChamaniDevi i.ate I^unj BiHari Mahato,Agedabout35years,Occu, Labour. H Beena Kumari S/6 Ruiy Bihari Mahato, aged about 16^ears, Occu. Labour. ^) deep chand S/6 Kunj Bihari Mahato, aged aboutl4years,Occu.Student; 4)/ Keeti Mahato S/oKuhj Bihari MaJiato, r ,^(^ aged about 10 yeaRS^Occu. Stuclent. ^V^^^t^^)^ ]^ ^l^^N^I-^'::"i;<'v:" /'•<.''^.-*'-.. A;"'' ^' l.;l! " ' ^•.;;.-,-1.^1';-'^:.'^'.'11^''"^ •ll'::1-:: .'. :.':.'- MinorNb.2 fiic^ v^-: ^. .^%^< ^i^^ %• /<• ^^•" •^ n deyi, I^te Kunj Biliari all resident village- Dadya tha & Thana Bagother , Distt. Giridhi(Jharkhand) VERSUS ^- RESPONDENTS ————^[)GyaiieshwarPandey@AlakhPaiuley, AppiiCti^S.-S S/o Shiv Prashad , Occu. Driyer, resi. P.S.-Bagbe<te, Distt. Shihbhumi(Jharkhand). ^2) Yogavali Devr Wo R.P.Pandey , throygh Ambika Enterprises near P.0.- Ifariiarguti, Jamshedpur Tata-Nagar (Jharkhand). /National- Insurance Co. Pyt. Ltd IjegisteredOfGce 3 MiddU Tpwn Street, Kolkata-70097, Through - Braneh Manager, Branch OfBce - ^•.- »aa Kalipati Road, SakacM , Jamshedpur .1' ;.: 1^-'1'' -. '.. '"'••. I (Jharkhand). L!;.-;;.;;':^ .-:1^ CIVIL REVISION TT^ 1^5 OF C'RIMINAiy PROCEI>URE CODE 4&^ ^>teJ(^M-4•c'Tfci^t^ n- XI-HC-22 3T^^T^T t^N'sn^T ^FHW^^y y». Brajesh ^ ~=¥ ?^'^WR^, 'g^N7!?, ^l<Hli< ,^.:cZ^:.t%..^ ww?ir^~w^ '^F^S' ^(^T ^<H^R ^?T 07/12/2004: - Heard Smt. Hamida Siddique, Shri Ali Asgar, learned counsel for respjondent learn^J counsel for the petttioner and :No.3. One Kunjbihari died in a road Claim case No.8/2004 on the flle of M<( claiming compensation as dependar|>ts. Nationat Insurance Co. Pvt. Ltd. however, the notice sent to reepondehts ofFending vehicte, respect^ely was n<| pubtication and the petitioners publish^d 'Ranchi Express' on three occasions oili Since even thereafter the matter was 2 ex-parte, the petitioners preferred The said application has been dismiss^d < been filed being aggrieved by that orcte|r. rlot afi totbk The fact that the petitioners was not ser^d and that thereafter pur^uant tothe out paper pubtication in the daHy referred supra is not dispute. If that ^ proceeds further in the matter sett^ng r^spondents The Tribunal is hereby direoted | respondents 1 and 2 ex-parte and to ^ the date of receipt of copy of this ord^i accordingly. <^S^I<r(4St1 ^W^S "^ f^St iFsi^K ^T3?f^m37T^T 4?cident and the petttioners herein fited 4tor Acciderrt Claims Tribuna}, Raigarh The third respondent namely, represented by its counsel. But, 1 and 2, owner anct driver of the i|)t sen/ed. The Court ordered paper the notice in the newspaper namely, 15-12-2003, 27-2-2004and 1-5-2004. taken up setting respondente 1 and application with a necessary prayer. and the present revision petitton has newspaper notice through Court and the same order ofthe Court they took on three occasions on the dates so, it is only proper that the Tribynat 1 and2ex-parte. to proceed further in the matter ^tting ompteteenquirywithin 3 months from The reviston petitipn is disposed of [Tft^ y^