IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 20.11.2008. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7326/2008 Om Prakash Bharti Vs. Raghvendracharya & Ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri J.P. Gupta earned counsel for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order the objection with regard to validity of the notice under Section 106 Transfer of Property Act raised by the defendant petitioner tenant has been decided by the learned trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought to challenge the same in the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. I am of the view that the petitioner if aggrieved by the ultimate decision, judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court would be entitled to raise these grounds which have been raised in the writ petition in any appeal that may be filed against the ultimate decree passed by the learned trial court as I do not find any jurisdictional error having been committed by the learned court below. It is further made clear that by the aforesaid order this court has not expressed any view on the merits of the contentions which have been sought to be raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Subject to the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS