1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.215 OF 2009. ASHOK GOVINDA GHUGE VS SURENDRA UDDHAORAO KAVALE ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. G. Ghuge, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2010. 1. The finding is recorded by the Trial Court in para 9 that in the complaint, the complainant has not disclosed 'Usanwar Chhithi'. While in the defence, the accused has come with a specific suggestion that the said document pertain to some other person namely Suresh Belokar. Since the complaint was silent on the nature of transaction it was not necessary for the accused to prove his defence and it was sufficient to raise frustration about the story of the prosecution. 2 2. In this background, the judgment of acquittal cannot be faulted. 3. No indulgence is called for. Appeal is dismissed. Judge //mule//