BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH : BILASPUR A.C. l€/09 OMsion Bsncl 'oo1' s S i^-i Appellant: Mahendra Kumar Pal, Aged about 10 years,S/o Santosh Pal [Minor] on behalfofminor his father Santosh Pal, S/o Khorbahra Pal R/o, Village Rawa, Thana Mandir Hasaud, Raipur, Tah.& Distt. Raipur [C.G.] Respondents; 1- Age S/o, about 47years, Ram Nishad, tion- Vehicle Driver, ,Sheetla Para, Arang, Tah.& Distt. Durg [C.G.] ^ 2- Ranianand Chandrakar S/o Ramadeen Chandrakar Occupation- Owner ofVehicle, R/o, Gram Mokhla, Thana-Arang Tah & Distt. Raipur [C.G.] 3- The New India Insurance Company Through Divisional Manager, Div. office no 2, Jeevan Beema Mar^ Raipur, [C.G.] -173 OF 1988, FOR ENHANCEMENT OF AWARD Arising out ofjudgement dated 02-12-08, in Claim Case no. 55/08, passed by Madam Kanta Martin, ixth Adl. Motor Accident Claim Tribunal [F.T.C] Raipur [C.G.] between Chandra Sekhar yadav versus Smt. Shila yadav and another •—-" I- Compensation Claimed: 2- • Compensation Awarded: .12,1 Claim Dismissed HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BS1ASPUR Hvision Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri & Hon'bie Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. Misc. Appeal (C) No.10^ of2Q^ Appeliant Respondents Sevak Ram Nishad & Others (Appeal under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicies Act, 19%) Pressnt:- None for the appetlant. Shri C.R. Sahu, counsel forthe rs^sondent No.2. Gowri (Passed o>~ thte 78' day ofJanuary, 2010) The matler is calted for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representafion made on behalf of Uie appellant. The appeliant may not be interesied in the matter. 2) in view of the above, the Misc. Appeai is dismissed for want of prosecution. —" Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotri Judge Prashant Kumar Misfara Judge (l^a^fl?EEt&3SaUilC^-S»^^r-^>>=L7Tj^y=SWSI3eT^3S^a^]ElaSn=lEart'-lSte3^^^?=^'^.-t