IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.3217 of 2005 Between: Kangula Chandraiah, S/o. Papaiah, R/o. H.No. 4-9-170/2, Vinayakanagar Colony, (RTC Colony) Hayatnagar Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief Manager, Corporation Bank, 3-6-285, Ammermahal Apartments, Hyderguda, Hyderabad - 29. 2 Sri K. Ramanjaneyulu, Authorised Officer, Corporation Bank, 3-6-285, Ammermahal Apartments, Hyderguda, Hyderabad - 29. 3 The Zonal Manager, Corporation Bank, H.No. 5-9-88/18/88/2, 1st Floor, Saphire Complex, Chapel Road, Hyderabad -1. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ under Article 226 of the constitution of India, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the ﬁrst and second respondent in publishing the public auction notice dated 7-2-2005 for sale of house property of the petitioner bearing No. 4-9-170/2, Vinayaknagar colony RTC Colony, Hayatnagar Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in public auction on 8-3-2005 in the oﬃce of the ﬁrst respondent as bad, arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to grant reasonable time to the petitioner for repayment of the due amount and not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner for realization of the loan amount, by regularizing the loan account and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.3217 of 2005 ORDER: Learned Counsel Sri A.Bhaskar, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.Damodar Reddy, submits that subsequent to ﬁling of the writ petition the petitioner settled the matter with Corporation Bank of India, which have dropped further action under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 05.09.2008 vs To 1 The Chief Manager, Corporation Bank, 3-6-285, Ammermahal Apartments, Hyderguda, Hyderabad - 29. Ammermahal Apartments, Hyderguda, Hyderabad - 29. 2 The Zonal Manager, Corporation Bank, H.No. 5-9-88/18/88/2, 1st Floor, Saphire Complex, Chapel Road, Hyderabad -1. 3 2CCs to 4 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}