>J^^I^'^,;,.,..ui..l,!t*L!l;, (^/r'fzro IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.12A30F 20(M5- PETITIONERS ^^^^- ..•^y-"' ..••'" c-^y .••••' ..^^ ^^•^ '%:-^' Smt. Pushpa Devi Gupta, W/o Shri Shiv Kumar Gupta, aged about 43 years, R/o Ward No. 20, Surya Complex, Oppt. Bus Stand, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G) VERSUS -->t-'' RESPONDENTS <' ^' &T l^^L.'' <?-- ^.sc;tlo(> ^a' -^s"" rt;ai '^^.^i ^y". ^ p-0'1'" ^\sS^' ^tftc.,-hh^-"- » >3!i 2. (^e^^^ b- State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Urban Administration & Development Department, Mantralaya, D K S Bhawan Raipur (Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D K S Bhawan Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, District Kabirdham, P O Kawardha (Chhattisgarh) Municipal Council, Kawardha through its Chief Municipal Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSfTTUTJQbLOFJNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, lyiANDAWIUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHERSUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTjON_OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: 3. HISH COURT OP CHHATHS6ARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (O No. 1243 of 2007 Si»^leBeneh:H<m'ble Shrf Satidi K. ^nihotri, J. Petitioner Smt. Pushpa &evi ffupta Vereus State of Chhattisgorh and others Present: Mr. Monindra Shrivasiwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sachin Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Venna, Deputy 6ovt. Advoffrte for the Stste/respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. OR&ER (Passed on 2nd &ay of March, 2007) This petition is filed on the basis on qaprehension of the petitioner that his property situoted at Plot No. 15 and 16, Sheet No. 17, Wwd No. 12, Kowardha is Sikeiy to be demoiished witiiout notice. 2. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, learned Eseputy ©ovt. AeJTOcate for the State/respondents submits that it appears that no mtice has been Issued as yet. It is further stated that the petitioner wifl be given sufficient notice before any step is taten for demolition of his property. 3. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that no step should be taken for demolition of the pniperty jn dispute without gjvirg prsop mtice. Consequently, M.(W.P. No. 820/2007, an application for grant of ad- interim writ stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash r