... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5468 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5468 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5468 OF 2005 1. Shri Sunderji Mansey Maru, 2. Smt Urmila Sundarji Maru, 3. Smt Parul Nilesh Maru ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri J.B. Mishra for the Applicants. Ms Rajeshree Gadhvi, A.P.P. for the State. Shri Shrima Shirsat i/by Raja Thakur and A.M.Chimalkar for the Complainant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 28, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate appearing for the Applicants states that he is not pressing the Application on merits. He further prays that sufficiently long time may be granted to the Applicants to surrender before the appropriate Court with liberty to the Applicants to apply for regular bail. I have heard the learned A.P.P. for the State and the Advocate representating the first informant. The request made by the Advocate for the Applicants is reasonable and deserves to be granted. 2. Application is dismissed as not pressed. Time is granted to the Applicants to surrender before the appropriate Court till 12th November, 2005. 3. It will be open for the Applicants to apply ... 2 ... for regular bail before the appropriate court. If such Application is made, the same will be decided on its own merits. If such Application is made, the concerned Court will decide the same as expeditiously as possible considering the fact that the Applicant No.1 is a senior citizen and the Applicant Nos.2 and 3 are women. 4. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE