IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2443 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. ANAND RAJA.D.S,AGED 19 YRS,S/O.D.DEVARAJ 'RAJA",RAILWAY STATION ROAD,INCHIVILA, PARASSALA.P.O,TRIVANDRUM-695 502. 2. PRAVEEN.M.V,AGED 21 YRS, S/O.BHASKARAN.M.V,MANAKKAMVEETTIL HOUSE, VALAVANNUR.P.O,MALAPPURAM,PIN-676555. 3. SREEJITH MOHAN, AGED 20 YRS, S/O.C.G.MOHAN,"SREENIKETHAN",PANAVALLY.P.O, CHERTHALA,ALAPPUZHA-688 566. 4. AJANAS.V.V, AGED 20 YRS,S/O.KUNHADDULLA, VENGODAN VEETTIL HOUSE,KAVILUMPARA.P.O, KUTTIADI, KOZHIKODE-673 513. 5. SANTHINI.S, AGED 18 YRS, S/O.R.SUBRAMANIAN,NO.228,OM SHAKTHI VINAYAGAR COIL STREET,GANDHI NAGAR,KANGEYANALLURE ROAD, VELLORE-632 006.TAMIL NADU. 6. DALMITTA NIYA JAMES,AGED 19 YRS, S/O.JAMES SAMUEL,POONKUZHAYIL HOUSE, MANKOMPU, CHOVOOR.P.O,PALA, KOTTAYAM-686 586. 7. JINI JOSE,AGED 18 YRS,D/O.JOSE ISSAC, 11/196 B,KIZHAKKEPARAMBIL HOUSE,CHACKO GARDEN LANE U.C.COLLEGE.P.O, ALUVA-683 102,ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.MANJERI SUNDERRAJ SMT.K.K.PREETHA (CNTD....2) WP(C).No. 2443 of 2009(N) -2- RESPONDENT: --------------- UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REP.BY CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,PAREEKSHA BHAVAN,TENHIPALAM, CALICUT UNIVERSITY POST,PIN-673 635,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI.P.C. SASIDHARAN, STANDING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C).No. 2443 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners were the first year MBBS students of the Calicut Medical College. By Exts.P1 to P7, they sought revaluation of the papers mentioned therein. In this writ petition they complain that there is inordinate delay in completing the revaluation applied for. 2. I heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University on the grievance highlighted. 3. Having regard to the above grievance it is ordered that the respondent shall complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners and declare their results as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, provided, the applications made have been received and are otherwise in order. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ttb W.P.C.No. 2443 OF 2009 -:2:-