§ing§e ”mm: j .v Swy cw w;';cvL-\_.A1m.,. v — v IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I—I'ISGARH AT BTI A§PHR WRIT PETITIONNo. £782. OF 2005 / PETITIONER ; / S. K. Chouhan, aged about 52 years, son of Late M. S. Singh Chouhan, §q\§&fby d 6S Inspector). R'p-F' East Coast Ral|way Jagdalpur, District Bastar, (C.G.). VERSUS The Union of India, Through: Ministry of . Railway, New Delhi. Chief Security Commissioner, R.P.F. East Coast Railway Chandra Shekharpur, Bhubneshwar. (Orissa). 3. Sr. Divisional Security Commissioner, R.P.F. East Coast Railway (Andhra Visakhapatnam, Pradesh). / WRIT PEITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. .1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. . DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS.’ 1g ' .‘u‘ A ),.4 W-amim K. 5%... * : fmmmaam “2005 aim W‘(W€)~ ' mmaw ’ «$Wmer 24. 08. 2005 a Mr: Sushll ,D’ubeu,‘ learned c: unsel fer the petitioner; :Mr,‘ ‘Vlnodfpeshrnukh, learned counsel for respondent No.3; > 4 - I LA. No.1217 of2005 _ This is an application for urg . Learned counsel for the p tmoner submits that the {petitioner ls an inspector in RPF and was posted in East Coast Railway; gJagadalpur Distrit Bastar.’He has been suspended on 30.03.2004. by‘r spondent No.3 pending departmental enquiry. Learned ounsel for the petitioner further submits that no reasons h ve been assigned in the suspension order as such the sus. desewes’to be quashed. On perusal 0f the papers, order dated 30.03.2064 (Annexure pending depadmegtal enquiry. ag petitioner has been suspended: In View of the fact thatno t xther irregularity has been ‘ e employer is competent to pass an in view of the foregoing, the No order as to costs. Judge nt hearing; The appllcatlon stands drspo ed of ension order is bad and i foun that suspension P-1) clearly indicates that, ainst the petitioner, the. rder of suspension. i/~' found and during pendency of theJdepartmental enquiry, th o‘etition‘is dismissed. Sdl‘ w‘ i SaushK Agmho / SP/Fs/zoos - 20,000 ti I '., x»v. m d :