1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5061 OF 2008 Hindi Prachar Mandal and Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Dr.Jaiprakash Lalji Mishra .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Dani for petitioner Mr.Jaydeep Deo H/f.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 26th June 2009. P.C.: 1] Respondent employee succeeded before the School Tribunal in Appeal No.29 of 2002 and sought execution and enforcement of this order. The petitioner management while resisting the Execution Application and enforcement, firstly contended that the order of reinstatement and backwages is challenged by the management by instituting writ petition and the same is pending. Secondly, assuming without admitting that there is no interim stay of the execution proceedings in the writ petition, yet, there is no basis for the claim of 1 backwages, inasmuch as, the backwages are not quantified. Therefore, an application was made in the pending enforcement and execution proceedings by the management for seeking certain directions which having been rejected, this petition. 2] A suggestion was made by the Court on the earlier occasion which was acceptable to the respondent employee that some Agency or person should quantify the quantum of backwages due and payable under the order of the School Tribunal. Now, Mr.Dani appearing for petitioner Management after taking instructions states that suggestion is imminently fair and, therefore, not questioned and disputed. However, a request is made by both sides that the Dy.Director of Vocational Eduction and Training, Bandra (East) should be appointed as the Authority/ Officer to compute and quantify the backwages payable to the respondent. Both sides agree to appear before him on 10th July 2009. 3] Accordingly, it is directed that the Dy.Director should compute and quantify the wages payable and admissible to the respondent and submit his report to the Executing Court within a period of two months from the date of appearance of parties. All please of both sides as regards the computation and calculation are kept open. Until the report of 1 Dy.Director is received, both sides not to insist upon enforcement and execution of the Award/ order of the School Tribunal. The Government Pleader, Appellate Side to communicate the order to the Dy.Director. Deputy Director should act on an authenticated copy of this order and submit his report as aforesaid. Petition disposed of. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)