IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2325 of 2008 Date of Decision: November 04, 2008 Sukhpal @ Pala .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed in challenge to Order dated 25.9.2008 whereby an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning Silk Ram, Smt. Satish, Rajinder @ Kala, Bharpai and Rakesh as additional accused has been dismissed. I have considered the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner and have also gone through the impugned order. Para 4 of the impugned order notices the issue involved. Learned counsel has not been able to point out any illegality in the reasoning. Learned counsel has further not been able to indicate any relevant material that has been ignored by the Trial Court in the context of the issue involved. Crl. Rev. No.2325 of 2008 [2] Learned counsel, however, wants this Court to re-appreciate the evidence and material and come to a different conclusion. No ground for interference is made out. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) November 04, 2008 JUDGE avin