IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8275 of 2007 REWATI RANJAN PRASAD SINGH, son of late Muneshwar Prasad Singh, resident of At & P.O. Ramna, P.S. Mithanpura, District – Muzaffarpur. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Ministry of Rail, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. The Indian Railway, Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited, Eastern Zone Office, 3, Kalighat Street, Ground Floor, Kolkata – 700 001. 3. The Regional Manager, Indian Railway, Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited, 4th Flopper, Biscomaun Bhawan, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. ----------- For the petitioner: M/S. Rajeev Kumar Singh and Nand Kumar Singh. For the IRCTC: Mr. A Amanullah. _______ 06. 21.04.2010 Already vide a detailed order dated 12.1.2010 a batch of writ applications which included some of the original petitioners in the present writ application, but were ordered to be deleted, was heard and disposed of. This is one of those writ application which raises similar question of fact and law. The reasoning assigned in the order dated 12.1.2010 in CWJC No. 3332 of 2008 (Ranjeet Ray Vs. Union of India and others) and analogous cases, will also cover the present case. The writ application stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent Corporation to take a 2 fresh decision after hearing the parties to the dispute. It is also recorded that petitioner will not be disturbed till the adjudication is made by the respondent Corporation in this regard. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )