IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20782 of 2008 RAM NAUBAT SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 11.8.2008. F.I.R. has been registered on the basis of complaint. Petitioner no.1 is husband of the daughter of the complainant, petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law and petitioner nos.3 to 6 are brother- in -law and sister-in-law. Omnibus allegation of demand of dowry and torture has been made. Counsel for the petitioners submits that at the time of filing of complaint, daughter of the complainant was residing in her matrimonial home. Subsequently when she came to her father’s place some more allegations have been made. Counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the daughter of the complainant is interested in living with her husband and family members but she wants to be insured she will be given good treatment. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely1. Ram Naubat Singh 2. Rukmini Devi alis Rukmani Devi alias Banchiya Devi 3. Niranjan Kumar Singh 4. Raj Kishore Singh alias Guddu, 5. Chandan Kumar Singh and 6. Anjali Kumari alias Anjali Devi alias Munni are directed to surrender before the C.J.M Katihar within four weeks from today and on their so surrendering they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of C.J.M.Katihar in connection with Falka P.S.Case no. 44 of 2008 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petitioner no.1 Ram Naubat Singh and petitioner no.2 Rukmini Devi alias Rukmani Devi alias Banchiya Devi, who is husband and mother-in-law of the daughter of the complainant have been granted bail subject to the condition that the daughter of the informant/complainant will be brought to her matrimonial home with full dignity and owner and she will not be tortured and no further demand of dowry will be made and she will be given liberty to lead her conjugal life happily. In case the conditions are not fulfilled the wife of petitioner no.1 namely Abhilasha Kumari will have liberty to bring this fact before the court below for taking necessary action. However, it is also made clear that the informant will stop interfering with the life of her daughter and son-in-law. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)