'l BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR, WRIT PETmON fSI N0. -^r6\ /2010 S PETITIONER v?'^-..- ^yyy ^wy ^'^e'^' .."' ..-^~ '\y.-"" ^."^y-" '•• ^ RESPONDENTS / 1. 2. 3. Virendra Bahadur Singh, aged about 64 years, son of Late Ram Naresh Singh, Retired Revenue Inspector, Resident of Near Govt Degree College, Main Road Odgi, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (CG) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan,Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) The Collector, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) The Joint Director (Treasury, Accounts and Pension) Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION U/A. 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (3)^10,5704 OF 2010 <^\ ' ;fri>' Petitioner Versus ResDoncients Virendra Bahadur Singh State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition uncter Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri N.K. Chatterji, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 2 day of February, 2011) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2. Shri Bhaduri, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State agrees with the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitloner and submits that the request of the petitioner is genuine and proper and the same order may be passed. 3. This Court, in the matter ofW.P. No. 4642/2004 {Baijnath Manda! v. The State of ChhaWsgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 [Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in IVI.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and anothef). Thus, this petition is squarety covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal {supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the partles. 4. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, &. 2 the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additionai documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shail supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn | Judge Arun