IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18278 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 28.09.2011 Suresh Chand .... PETITIONER Versus The Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Ms. Amita Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Petitioner Suresh Chand has filed this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider his claim for allotment of a plot of suitable size under the oustees quota, as per the policies of the Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as `the HUDA'). It is the case of the petitioner that in the year 1989, his big chunk of land was acquired by the HUDA, for development of Sector 29, Urban Estate, Gurgaon and against the said acquisition of his land, his claim for allotting a plot in the oustees quota has not been considered till date and no plot has been allotted to him. In this regard, the petitioner through his CWP No. 18278 of 2011 -2- counsel has served a legal notice dated 27.9.2010 (Annexure P-3) upon respondents No.1 to 3, but the same has not been considered and decided so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider and decide the said legal notice in accordance with law and particularly, in accordance with the decision of this Court in CWP No. 19927 of 2009, titled as Sandeep versus State of Haryana and others, decided on May 16, 2011. In view of the above, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice of motion, as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, Gurgaon (respondent No.2), to consider and decide the legal notice dated 27.9.2010 (Annexure P-3), expeditiously, in accordance with law and in the light of the aforesaid judgment of this court as well as other precedent in this regard. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE September 28, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) ndj JUDGE