\ a) W 7/; 1N THE HIGH COURT OF’ CHHATTISGARH S.B. AT (Service BILASPUR Matteri (CHHATTISGARm WRIT PETITION (S) No. é‘f 50 /2010. / PETITIONER: Dayalu Ram Thakur, son of JeeV Rakhan Singh, aged about 59 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Aatra, Rajnandgaon, District Chhattisgarh. VCI‘SUR x I Res ondents 1. ./ étate of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, fRajpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Rajnandgaon, Mo’Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, C.G. § WRIT pETITION CONSTITUTION UNDER ARTICLE OF INDIA 2260F THE I (L? E WAKER mmw‘ mnmm WW W$R§TI wmm $a=ifaqa11é¥1 $3 : HONBEE MR JUSTECE ¢RITENKER DE 1 1. 1 13910 Shm‘ K S4 Pawar cotmsd f fh€ petiti011ers. Shy vév’sk $kia§ma, PL. f ime ataté. CounSel for t ystio smits iiiat rim grefjtimxer is increments on account of he hiilg passed B,T.I. oxamti beforo his appointmont at his own cost. It is subm1j€<i at issue irkvoived ii} ihe prosent pctition Iosr res ingra same has baen fmaHy decided by the Hon’ble Supr Court in tho case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of MAI. 6:. 0x 2&09 {EEEgMPJR (so; 59. Kt is furfher suhits ’i this Court. has also mica}: a. .2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/ 2608. Counss or the p nor fm‘thor submizs that ‘rho ordor de 29.4.2010 yassod Wxi’t. Appoal NO. 124,!2009, Wherom reiying o he jtg t off Supmme Court is fhe case of ha Saxea {supra} an tho order passed by this {hurt 1'11 another Wn't Appeai No. 2Q09, directions have been issd for consieierat of t e for grant of two advaoce increments as per Circular t 21.9. 74 issued by the State of Mi Prac‘lesh, after verif of the fads gieaded in the peion. Counsel for the Se su ts tt case of the petitiouers wouki' ao be considered on the me lines. or ; ar t s he itnsr ub elitled to bef of two advaI av mao . i th f a is no ng te and the mid h ,t se: View in its nier Ciatm } f 6 % ’o ato . upn t zdm n he As tx s 8 [ ue ion he cas dae 19 achya ic fion tit iat b i ha ls .a e. V it neit K e a e 5 mil o i W W, m, W mm (Wu) maxim Wmm WW Wm wmmw agaimanéw In. View of above, the petition is disposcci 0f with a dimction to the respondent authm‘itios to docido the ciaim of the petitioner for grant of two advance incremente as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the §tate of Madhya Pradesh after veriiication of the facts pleazied int the petition within. a period of eight weeks from today. It is made clear that this Eourt has riot expressed' gmy opinion on merits of the case amd the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordarlce with iaw. 5’ Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge