HON’BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15363 OF 2007 Between: T. Nagesh ...Petitioner AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Hyderabad and others. ...Respondents :: O R D E R :: Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P. Veera Reddy 19th July, 2007 Per G.S.SINGHVI, C.J. In this petition, the petitioner has made the following substantive prayer: “i)………….it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in sanctioning of the construction permission and the approval plan to the 3rd respondent for construction of a residential complex vide Proceedings No.G 705/809/615/04-05 dated 31-3-2005 of the Commissioner, Sherlingampally Municipality basing on the technical approval granted by the HUDA as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unjustified and unsustainable and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the said construction permission and approval issued in favour of the 3rd respondent and pass such other order or orders as it may deem fit. ii) …………………it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take appropriate steps for stoppage of construction of the compound wall by the 3rd respondent in pursuance of the sanctioned permission and the approved plan issued to him vide Proceedings No.G 705/809/615/04-05 Dated 31-3-2005 of the Commissioner, Sherlingampally Municipality for construction of a residential complex in Survey No.157 (Part-A and Part-B) of Hafizpet Village, Sherlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or orders as it may deem fit pending disposal of the writ petition.” After arguing the case for some time, Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner made a request that his client may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail other remedies. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.19405 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed. G.S.SINGHVI, C.J. 19th July, 2007. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J ARS