:1: 622.11-wp bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.622 OF 2011 Dodavva Ashok Naik ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Amit Sale for petitioner. Mr.Vijay Patil, GP for respondent-State. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.G.KETKAR,JJ. DATE :- JANUARY 21, 2011 P.C. Heard. Perused petition. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent of parties taken up for hearing. 3. This petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 10th January, 2011 issued by respondent No.4. The said order is based on the resolution dated 5th August, 2010. A Division Bench of this Court had an occasion to consider the question relating to the validity of the said resolution and operation thereof in Writ Petition No.8040 of 2010 Mrs.Razia Shahanur Muzawar & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra decided on 15 th October, 2010 (unreported) and Writ Petition No. 4155 of 2010 Suman Shriram Kakad Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. decided on 7 th December, 2010 (unreported), wherein the validity of the said resolution is upheld and by subsequent judgment it is held that the said Government Resolution will have a prospective effect. In that view of the matter, for the reasons stated in the judgment in the case of Suman Shriram Kakad (Supra), the impugned order dated 10th January, 2011 is quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)