HIGH COURT OF JUD!CATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, GJ., WRIT PETITION N0. 6284 OF 2005 PETlTlDNER: Krishna Kumar Chandrakar Sic R.K. Chandrakar Aged about 40 years, ' R/o Vi“. Boriyakhurd, Raipur, Tahsilland Dist. Raipur Vs. RESPONDENTS: 1 . State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Col‘entor Raipur (C.G.) 2. Krishi Upaj Mandi Raipur (C.G.) 3‘ Managing Director Agricultural Marketing Board (Kri3hi Upaj Mandi) Raipur (C.G.) t Present: Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Govt. Advocate for the State! respondents No.1. Mr. Ranbir Singh Marhas, counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 6““ January, 2006) The ground urged in this writ petition could be urged as a ground of attack as provided under sub-clause (iv) of ciause (d) of sub-ruie (2) of Rule 44 of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi (Adhisuchana Prakashan Riti, Bharsadhak Samiti Tata Mandi Samiti Gathan) Niyam, 1974 in an Election Petition. lt is well settled that the Courts should be slow to interfere with the electoral process. That principle is based on a laudable objective that the election to the public oftiees should be held as per the schedule of events without interruptions by the Courts and if the * Ag? election of a candidate is iiiegai or irregular on any permissibie ground, the eiection of the elected candidate could be challenged by way af election petition. ln that View of the matter, having heard learned counsel for the parties for considerable time. l am not inciined to step-in under Articie 226 of the Constitution cf india. lt was submitted on behalf at the respondents that the election notification is not issued in this case due to interim order made by this Court and in alt other cases notification is already issued (2) ln that View of the matter, l dismiss the writ petition leaving it open the grounds urged in this writ petition to be agitated by the petitioner at an appropriate stage. Sdl- Giief Justice smW"