@ $ f L0// IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review Petition No. ?S/ /201O (Arising out of W.P. No. 712[2005I ginglargenéx PETITIONER . WChhattisgarh Infrastructure ¢ (Respondent 1) e s Development ‘ Corporation, through its Divisional Manager y APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 25533009, PASSED 1N W.P. N0."71'2/2005, BY THIS HON’BLE c‘OURT W Tbnna‘nggm i t ' ) ‘ $J. Vlt’aaxt Maé......-.. i Headquarter VERSUS Es ESPONDENTS Bharatdas Vajshnav, S/ o Bhudu (PETITIONER) Das Vaishnav aged about 4O years, R/o Village Qtr No—LIG No— / 106 M.P.\ Nagar KOrba Distt— Korba (CG) K (RESP. i No.2) ' Kai” The State Industrial Court i ‘ ’ through its Chairman, Raipur fix/(RESP No.3) /3i The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bilaspur (CG) HIGH COURT OF &VP'@? CHHATTI AT BILASPUR REVIEW PETITION gPR) No. 371 of2010 PETITIONER : Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development (Respondent—1) Corporation. V VERSUS VRESPONDENTS : Bharatdas Vaishnav & Others. (PETITIONER) W APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER DATED 25.06.2009 PASSED IN W.P. NO. 712/2005 SB: Hon’me sim‘ Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: ‘ Smt. Anju Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER (ORAL! (Paesed on 12 day of August, 2010) LA. N0. 1. rThis is an application for condonation of dekay in filing the review application The application is ordered as prayed for. ‘ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a properly constituted review petition. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. 4. On the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Registry is directed to return back the certified copy of the order dated 25.06.2009 (Annexure A/5) to the petitioner aiter retaining a photocopy oftlie same. SAT'ISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge Amit e x~n Sdl- / > .,. x”.