AB 40/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. N.J. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learn ed Addl. PP appearing for the State. The accused petitioner is implicated in connection with Dispur PS Case No. 175 7/10 U/S 420/406/506 IPC. The case diary as called for has been produced to-day. It is found that the accused petitioner was instrumental to introduction of the informant, a businessman, with one Pawan Sarma, the Project Manager (Finance of Commerce) of Deepak Power & Tele Communication (P) Ltd. Subsequently, there h as been business relation between the aforesaid informant and the Sri Pawan Sarm a. However, there was no business relation with the accused petitioner. I find n o material in the case diary against the accused petitioner. In view of above, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, Sri Hrishikesh Kalita, in connection with the aforesaid PS Case, he shall be rel eased on bail of Rs. 15,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the sa tisfaction of the arresting authority on the condition that he shall appear befo re the I.O. for recording the statements as and when required. Bail application stands disposed of.