sraas^ ^^•" _^ "^ ^-•^^ "-^ y ^' "'* '% 4f ^. . '^ i ^mi^ 1 1 "v^^i, j "?^ ^i^i<ri4, ^•al^^Ko, I^cni^y ^Vt-v ^flWRWWNq? '^200 ^RT^?r TRW (^i^^T) 3ff^T'SRT Rl'lJ^i WT 3H^?T iFRhF .- ^WK^R «^a^i^i (Sinale Bench; Hon'ble A W.P. (s) PETCTCONER (Petition U/A 226 Pradeep Shri G. Commerc (C.G.). Versus RESPONbENTS 1. Statel the S^ Bhawa] 2. (C.G.).| Present: Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Adv. for the p Mrs. Smita Ghai, P.L for the State. 19.12.2008 By this petition the petitio] respondents to consider and re| petitioner from the date of his pas\ Learned counsel for the p^ matter bunch of petitions were d^ 23.3.2007 passed in W.P. (s) No.| dispose^ of with liberty to ^i<<I^<fli 'RTTOf '^T'fe^ <i^^i< ^3tRtHW^I r. Justice bhirendra Mishra) Mo.7119/2008 )f Constitution of India) Singh Chauhan, aged 39 years, son of >. Chahan, Assistant Grade III, al Tax bepartment, Circle-I, burg jGovernment of Chhattisgarh, through: |cretary, Commercial Tax Deptt., D.K.S. i|i, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Samb^agiya Upayukta, Vanijyik Kar, burg stitioner. |ier is praying for a direction to the |ease the annual increments of the ^ing Hindj typing test i.e. 19.1.1992. ^titioner submits that in the similar |cided by this Court vide order dated p33/07 whereby thepetitions were petiltioners of those petitions to moke ^ra^i^U ^ii^^ <§^I^(M— FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. TSET ^i^icn^, ^'al<H<j(o, I^cni^L|< 3?n^r ^t Rt^icb WT^ff^T^FRW ^ F iA- '>.^ ^ iWqyiTWNIcft "^ 200 ^IT^T^V (^i^^) ^KIK^R ^^ ^ll^l 2- obMf<rl^1^ +<M<A* ^ fe^ TM^K ^r3tRrH3n^i representation before the conj:erned authority and the concerned authority was directed to consid^r their case. He further submits that this petition may also be disposec^ of with a direction to the petitioner to make detailed representation respondent No.l for redressal competent aythority be direct^d to consider and decide the same expeditiously. Learned counsel for the objection if the petition is dispos^ In view of the above submil the instant petition is disposed of detailed representation raising a along with copy of this order respondent No.l and on such rep authority of respondent No.l, a1 3efore the competent authority of of his grievances and in turn, the respondents submits that he has no d of in the aforesaid terms. ;sion of learned counsel for the parties, with liberty to the petitioner to make a 1 his grievances raised in this petition before the competent authority of 'esentation being made, the competent :ter due verficiatoin, shall decide the same in accordance with law exp^ditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receip^ of the representation. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^W^ ^^T ^"U^ <M-lKliM—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.