1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1907 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST)NO.9522 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8784 OF 2007 1.Shri.Manohar Narayan Kelkar & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.M.S.Karnik,for Petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.R.S.Khadeparkar, for Respondent no.4. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 12TH MARCH,2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. Civil application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST)NO.9522 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8784 OF 2007 1.Shri.Manohar Narayan Kelkar & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.M.S.Karnik,for Petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.R.S.Khadeparkar, for Respondent no.4. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 12TH MARCH,2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. The learned Counsel appearing for petitioners does not dispute that when the matter was argued before us, only one document was relied on and that document has been considered. He 3 submits that there are other documents which also show that the property was landlocked and had no access. But it is not the case of the petitioners that with due diligence he could not have procured those documents when the writ petition was filed and was heard by the Court. Therefore, non production of the documents which could have been procured with due diligence, cannot be a ground for review. The review petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)