IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.94 of 2007 LAKHI RAM MURMU & ORS Versus SUMITRA MOITRA ----------- 02. 07.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This civil revision has been filed on behalf of defendants-petitioners challenging order dated 16.11.2006 by which the learned Munsif-II, Kishanganj, allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff-opposite party for admitting a document as evidence in Rent Suit No. 02 of 2005. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff-opposite party for a decree of eviction of the defendants from the suit land on the ground of default and also for proportionate share of the yield in respect of the suit property. The defendants appeared and contested the suit whereafter hearing started and while the evidence of the plaintiff was going on she filed a petition for admitting the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant no.3 of the year 1991 as evidence in the instant suit. The said petition was contested by the defendants who filed a rejoinder. The learned court below allowed the said petition of the plaintiff by the impugned order. It appears that he was satisfied that the said document was relevant for the proper disposal of the suit and non-filing of the document earlier can be deemed to be an ordinary mistake due to which he should not be punished. The learned court below has also held that the objection of the defendants with regard to the said document would be considered at - 2 - the time of disposal of the suit. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this court does not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below and accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)