IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.968 of 2010 Sita Devi Memorial Institute of Education & Technology, Idgarh Road, Jwalapur, Haridwar, through its Managing Director Smt. Anju Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Secretary, Higher Education, Civil Secretariat, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. 2. H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar, Garhwal, through its Registrar. 3. National Council for Teacher Education, Northern Regional Committee, Jaipur, through its Regional Director. … Respondents. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P.Upadhyay, Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. J.P.Joshi, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Date June 18, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief:- i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the office order dated 18-5-2010 (Annexure No.7 to the writ petition), issued by Registrar, H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar, Garhwal-respondent no.2. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 not to enforce the petitioner-institution to get its affiliation extended from the respondent no. 2 every year for B.P.Ed. course, alternatively, it may be declared that the affiliation is always of permanent in nature. iii. Pass any other and further orders, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. iv. Award the cost of writ petition to the petitioner. 2 In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner institution made a representation before the respondent no. 2 on 10-6-2010 to the Vice Chancellor of the H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar, Garhwal, for redressal of its grievance, but no decision has been taken on the representation of the petitioner (Anneuxre-8 to the petition). Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the ends of justice would be served if a direction is issued to the authority concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking order after hearing the petitioner. Prayer is innocuous. The Vice Chancellor of the respondent no.2-University is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner-institution (Annexure 8 to the petition) by a speaking order after hearing the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP