HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.15418 of 2006 Date: 25-07-2006 Between : Syed Najmuddin Hussaini and others. … Petitioner/s and Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep.by its Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad and others. …Respondent/s HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.15418 of 2006 O R D E R : Heard counsel on record. Sri T. Niranjan Reddy takes notice for respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the fact that the petitioners have submitted the explanation, respondents may be directed to consider the objections raised by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders. It is not in controversy that the second respondent issued notices to the petitioners under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred in short as ‘the Act’ for the purpose of convenience) without issuing any notice under Section 452 of the Act. It is needless to say that similar matters were disposed of by this Court with appropriate directions and in view of the same, the writ petition can be disposed of directing the second respondent to treat the notice issued as the show-cause notice. It is also stated that certain objections have already been filed. If the petitioners are not satisfied with the objections, further liberty is given to the petitioners to file additional objections. The second respondent is directed to receive the said objections within a period of two weeks and dispose of the same in accordance with law. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. __________________ P.S.NARAYANA, J 25-07-2006. NOTE: Operative portion by wire at party’s cost. (B/O) Msr. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.15418 of 2006 25-07-2006 (Msr)