IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2010 / 28TH POUSHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1499 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8200/2009 Dated 13/03/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- VENKURINJI S.N.D.P. BRANCH NO.286, VENKURINJI P.O, MUKKUTTUTHARA, PIN-686 510, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, P.N.VISWANATHAN, S/O.K.NARAYANAN, AGED 70 YEARS. BY ADV. SRI.BIMAL K.NATH SRI.S.JAMAL SRI.E.M.SUNIL KUMAR SRI.SREEVALSAN.V RESPONDENT(S): 5TH RESPONDENT ----------------------------- VIJAYAKUMAR, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT RE-SURVEY ADHALATH, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. MS.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- COC No.1499 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T Non-compliance of Annexure-A1 judgment dated 13/03/2009 in W.P.(C) No.8200/2009 is what is complained of in the contempt of court case. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that pursuant to the judgment, the petitioner was heard on 26/12/2009 and after enquiry, his representation has been rejected. Now that order has been passed as above, it is up to the petitioner to seek his remedy against the said order, if he is aggrieved by the same. With that liberty, this contempt of court case is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg