1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1799 of 2009 Abdul Nissar Abdul Sttar ...VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. C.A.Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Anoop Parihar, A.G.P. for Respondent nos.1, 2 & 3 C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 12th August, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition in view of the statement made in paragraph 8 of the reply affidavit filed by respondent nos.2 & 3, dated 05/9/2009. He seeks liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned revenue authority for appropriate relief after the review application, filed by Smt. Shobha Ramkrushna Wankhade before the Additional Collector, Akola, is decided. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. It is open for the petitioner to approach the concerned revenue authority/authorities for appropriate relief after the review application, as aforesaid, is finally disposed of. 2 If any such application, after disposal of the aforesaid review application, is made by the petitioner to the concerned revenue authority/authorities, the same may be decided on merits in accordance with law. While passing this order, we shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale