IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2009 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 35219 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MARY GRACE,UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT,B.E.M.U.P.SCHOOL,PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN SMT.K.S.SABITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CORPORATE MANAGER,ALL CSI SCHOOLS IN MALABAR & WYNAD,BANK ROAD,CALICUT. 2. TINO ROSHAN THOMAS.K,HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT,CMS HIGH SCHOOL,ARAPPETTA, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,WAYANAD, KALPETTA. 4. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHPURAM. 5. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.,GENERAL EDUCATIONAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.35219/2009-V ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 11th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Upper Primary School Assistant in B.E.M.U.P School, Ponnani managed by the first respondent. She entered service as U.P.S.A on 31/07/2001 and has satisfactorily completed her probation with effect from 31/07/2002. She is a Post Graduate in Sociology and is having B.Ed Degree from Calicut University and has also acquired SET qualification in March 2004. 2. The petitioner came to know that a new post of H.S.A (Social Studies) was sanctioned in C.M.S High School, Arappetta, Wayanad District and she was expecting promotion. But, the second respondent was appointed in the said vacancy. In these circumstances, the petitioner raised a claim in the matter. It appears that the approval of appointment of the second respondent was refused initially but the Manager had filed an appeal against the same and by Ext.P1 the said appeal was allowed. The appointment is approved with effect from 05/09/2008. The main ground raised by the petitioner herein is that the approval has been obtained without disclosing the statutory claims of the petitioner herein. In these circumstances the petitioner has filed a revision petition as per Ext.P4. W.P.(C). No.35219/2009 -:2:- Seeking for a direction to dispose of the revision petition, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. It is informed that the said revision petition is still pending. 4. There will be a direction to the fifth respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 after hearing the petitioner and respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this Judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the fifth respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms