IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32571 of 2010 SANTOSH GUPTA @ SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It appears that misbranded ,-pepsi, fruti, fresh juicy have been recovered from the shop of the petitioner. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not manufacturer of the said articles. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner(Santosh Gupta @ Santosh Kumar Gupta) in the event of arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with G.O. Case no. 101 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Madhubani subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))