IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1054 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32076/2009 Dated 20/01/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WP(C) -------------------------------------- M.P.VASUDEVAN NAMPOODIRY, S/O.M.N.PARAMESWARAN NAMBOODIRI,B-16,FACT TOWNSHIP UDYOGMANDAL.P.O,ELOOR,NOW WORKING AS LECTURER IN PHYSICS,SREE SANKARA VIDAYAPEDOM COLLEGE, PERUMBAVOOR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV V.KURUP SRI.ALEX.M.SCARIA RESPONDENT(S): 3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C) ------------------------------------------ 1. KURUVILLA JOHN,IAS,THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,THE GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033. 2. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT, DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION 6TH FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SRI.P.K.VELAYUDHAN,REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,M.C.R.V.HOSTEL OLD BUILDING,GENERAL HOSPITAL ROAD, COCHIN-11. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 1054/2010 ================== Dated this the 31st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In this contempt case, the petitioner alleges non-compliance with the direction in Annexure 2 interim order. In the said interim order, I directed the respondents in the writ petition to disburse the salary due to the petitioner in the post of Lecturer (Senior Scale) within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The respondents have filed an affidavit stating that the amounts due to the petitioner have already been disbursed to the petitioner. The petitioner is not disputing receipt of certain amounts. According to the petitioner, large amounts have been illegally deducted as income tax and, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner still subsists. I am of opinion that that is a matter which the petitioner has to take up in the writ petition itself appropriately. Without prejudice to that right, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2