1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Review) No. 305/2010 in Writ Petition No. 4306/2007 Public Education Society, Murtuzapur through its President. vs. Dilawarkhan Daudkhan Pathan and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE,J DATE : 09.04.2010 Heard Mr. S. Raisuddin, learned counsel for the applicant. By this application, the applicant seeks review of the order dated 27.82008 by which Writ Petition No. 4306/07 filed by the petitioner against the order dated 17th July, 2007 passed by the School Tribunal, Amravati in Appeal No. 80/2003 allowing the appeal filed by the respondent no.1, was dismissed. The respondent no.1 was appointed as Jr. Clerk in the School run by the applicant with effect from 1.12.1997. The respondent no. 1 was not allowed to sign the muster roll with effect from 5.8.2003 and in spite of efforts to join duties he was not allowed to join 2` the duties. He, therefore, filed appeal on 16th October 2003 before the School Tribunal which was allowed by the learned School Tribunal. According to the Management, the respondent no.1 has remained absent from duties for a considerable length of time and on 2.9.2003 he tendered resignation. The School Tribunal held that the appeal was within time and he was entitled to be reinstated since he was illegally terminated. The writ petitioner preferred by the applicant was dismissed by order dated 27th August, 2008 holding that the appeal filed by the respondent no.1 was not time barred and that the finding given by the learned School Tribunal that respondent no.1 had not tendered his resignation was not perverse. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and having perused the record I do not find any ground to grant review of the order. The findings recorded by the School Tribunal have been confirmed by this Court and, there is no error apparent on the face of record. Hence, the application is dismissed. JUDGE patle 3`