THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9543 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioners preferred a revision under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, before the 1st respondent, feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 22.12.2008, passed by the 2nd respondent. Initially, he granted an order of stay, on 04.02.2009. However, it was vacated on 27.04.2009. The same is challenged in this Writ Petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents 1 to 3, and Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned counsel for respondents 4 to 9. Both the parties agree that the 1st respondent has directed the revision to be listed ‘for hearing’, on 06.06.2009. On being satisfied, prima facie, about the facts of the case, he granted stay in favour of the petitioners, on 04.02.2009. There is no substantial reason as to why the stay be not continued, till the disposal of the revision. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed and it is directed that the order, dated 22.12.2008, passed by the 2nd respondent shall remain stayed, till disposal of the revision by the 1st respondent. Endeavour shall be made by the 1st respondent to dispose of the revision itself, before the end of August, 2009. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:30.04.2009. Note: Furnish C.C. by tomorrow. (B/o) GJ