Crl. Misc. No. M- 6622 of 2009 Chindo vs. State of Punjab and another Crl. Misc. No. M- 7094 of 2009 Buta Singh vs. Lakhbir Kaur Crl. Misc. No. M- 7223 of 2009 Sukhdev Singh vs. State of Punjab and another Present: Mr.G.N.Mali, Advocate and Mr.G.S.Jagpal, Advocate for Mr.TPS Tung, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. Mr.A.S.Kalra, Advocate for the complainant. **** This order shall dispose of CRM-M Nos. 6622, 7094 and 7223 of 2009 . At the time of issuance of notice of motion, the following order was passed on 9.3.2009 in CRM-M No.6622 of 2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initially three enquires were held by the Investigating Agency and the complaint was found to be false. The cancellation report (Annexure P-2) was also submitted. Thereafter, now the petitioner has been summoned in the complaint filed by respondent No.2 vide order dated 5.7.2008 (Annexure P-3), whereas, no specific allegation was levelled against the petitioner in the complaint. Notice of motion for 2.4.2009. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Batala Crl. Misc. No. M- 6622 of 2009 -2- within two weeks from today and she shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the said Court.” In CRM-M No.7223 of 2009 and CRM- M No.7094 of 2009 notice of motion was issued and the said petitions were ordered to be listed along with CRM-M No.6622 of 2009 and the petitioners were granted interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the petitioners have surrendered before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class Batala in terms of the orders passed by this Court. Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed these petitions. Keeping in view the peculiar facts of these cases, these petitions are allowed. Orders granting interim bail dated 9.3.2009, 17.3.2009 and 19.3.2009 are made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE April 02, 2009 anita