IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No.670 of 2010 Date of Decision 26.04.2010 Ganesh ...... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocate,for Mr.Aman Pal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents-State. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Reply filed on behalf of respondents-State, is taken on record. The petitioner has preferred this petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, for appointment of Warrant Officer, for getting released the alleged detenues and the tractors, as mentioned in the head note of the petition,from the illegal detention of respondents No.4 & 5. The relevant para of the reply, submitted by District Magistrate, Hisar, is as under:- “That at the time of visit by the Committee, six members of the family of the complainant were found on M/s Shyam BKO, Kanoh instead of 14 members mentioned in the writ petition. During inquiry, labourers stated that there was some dispute of tractor and trolley which has now been resolved. They stated that Brick Kiln owner has never made them bounded. They further stated that workers Roshan, Jasvinder, Sunny, Dharambir, Bhira Ram, Mamta,Krishan and Karamchand had never worked on this Brick Kiln. They stated that they were working with full freedom and liberty. They are still willing to do work and did not want to leave the Brick Kiln.” In view of aforesaid, no further action is called for. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 26.04.2010 mamta-II