WP(C) 6877/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTIC B P KATAKEY Heard Mr DK Sarma, leaned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs HM Phukan, learned state counsel appearing for the respondent no.1. Also heard Mr PK Deka, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 and Ms P Chakraborty, learned counsel fo r respondent no.4. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action on the part of the responden t Municipal Board in awarding the contract for improvement of the Saraswati Colo ny By-lane starting from Tiniali Station Road in front of the Rangia Arabic Coll ege towards the Talukdars’ residence W/no.6 by earth filling, brick flat soling and PCC etc under DDP for the year 2009-10, in favour of the respondent no.4. Ac cording to the petitioners, though, in pursuance of the NIT floated by the respo ndent board they participated by submitting their tenders and their bids were fo und to be lowest, the work was allotted in favour of the respondent no.4, withou t any justification. Learned counsel for the respondent Board has submitted that in pursuance of the work order dated 6th December, 2010, the respondent no.4 had completed t he work. Since the work has already been completed, nothing remains to be decided in the prsent proceeding. It would, however, not preclude the petitioners to in itiate civil proceedings in the appropriate Civil Court having jurisdiction over the matter for the damages, if any, caused to the petitioner by the action on t he part of the respondent Board in awarding the contract in favour of the respon dent no.4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above observation. No costs.