IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1223 of 2010 (S/S) Nar Dutt … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Revenue Department Sachivalay, Dehradun & Others. … Respondents Mr. T.S. Rautela, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. December 28, 2010 Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner, who is working as Patwari, has challenged the order dated 12.6. 2008 passed by the respondent no. 3, by which the petitioner has been censured and his three increments have been withheld on temporary basis. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner had submitted applications for sanction of his leave as he had fallen sick and was getting treatment at Pithoragarh. It is further stated that on 21.7.2009, the petitioner submitted his representation dated 30.6.2009, annexed as Annexure No. 12 to the writ petition, before the Commissioner, Kumaon Mandal, Nainital, but till date the said representation has not been decided. 3. Considering the fact that the petitioner has submitted a detailed representation before the Commissioner, Kumaon Mandal, Nainital, it would be in the fitness of things, if the Commissioner, Kumaon Mandal, Nainital considers the said representation dated 2 30.6.2009 and decide the same with speaking and reasoned order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented before him. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) 28.12.2010 Prabodh