3mm gmw In the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.NO. @9 a 9Lf7 2006 Shankal Lal Thakur, aged 42 years, K Petitioner ’4’ Block Education Officer, D UJL-g District Durg (C‘G.) 62/ {/3‘ Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution 0flndia for the issuance of WRIT in the nature ofMANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions. \o Q€ Gambhjr Lal Thakul, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Chandkhuri, R/o Village — Aanda, Tahsil and District Durg (CrG.) $o-"";;: Q.$ ' oé‘ 6 VERSUS Q6? &‘.,...« $§Respondents :1. The State Government of Chhattisgarh, r Through — The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Oflicer, Durg HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA. SPUR W. P. (s) No. 4949 of 2006 Pefh’ioner- E Shankcr- Ln! Thakur Versus T Responden-rs = 5mm Govt 0f Chha‘Hisgarh (3g ofhers ‘ Single Beneh: Hon'ble Mr. Justicz Sai'ish K. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivasmvn, Advoeu‘re for The Pe'mioner‘. Sm: Anju Ahujn, Dy. Govt. Advocaw for fhe respondents/Siam. O R D E R (11“ Seprember, 2006) 1. Learned‘counse! app‘earirig for fhe pefifioner submhs +haf while working as Assistan‘f Teacher, fhe pe'l'i'rioner has gone on training ‘m improve his qualifica1’ions on his own expenses and acquired BVTI. Examina'rion Certificate in fhe year 1992 from fine Board of Higher Secondary Eduoafion, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopai. Z. Awarding fa learned counse! for The petitioner, the petiiioner is enfitied io two advance incremenis in View of #he decision of This Cour'f in ihe case of Vashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. \ Municipa! Corpora‘l'ion, Durg and ano‘l’her {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour'i' in 1'he case of Yashwan‘i' Kumur Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and onoiher (Supra), come 1'0 the .... @ conclusion ‘tha? 'rhe feachers, who had obtained B.T.I. Examinafion Cerfificufe on his own expenses, are covered by ihe circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/2) issued by fhe Smfe Government of Madhya Pradesh Learned counse! far +he pe‘h‘fioner- further- submits Thai ‘rhe fads and quesi'ion of iqw invoived in fhe presen'f case are squarely covered by decision of this Cour‘i in the case of Vashwan‘i Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipui Corpora'i'ion, Durg and anofher (Supra), fo which learned counsel appearing for 'ihe responden'is fairly concedes and agrees wi'fh fhe avermen‘i’ mode by learned counSel appearing for The pe'l’i‘i'ioner. Accordingly, ihe wri-i pen-Hon is ailowed in ferms of fhe order passed in fhe cm of Vashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, burg and another (Supra), subject to verification“ of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenSes or not. No order as to costs. W a Wesse‘w ww‘mw«wv~w~ue“ Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri g Judge :x x