'9- PETITIONER W.P.(S) N0. 2-6 ft( OF 2011 ^ Chinta Ram Sahu S/o Ramdayal Sahu , Aged about 63 Years, VUlage post Asra Tahsil DongargaonDistrict Rajnandgaon ;.G.) RESPONDENTS / 1. ..& ^ \^...-^->. ^%^ ^ yW ^ y^ .**' 2 <?< - 3 Secretary State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Principal Governm.ent Higher Secondry School; Asra District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Joint Director Treasury and Pension Raipur Distriet Raipur (C.G) l~~/y^ '\~ 1 1 ^^ y i VL^ '^-^^s^ XI-HC—78 WWIT^ittPR TSf '^WM^, ®flly'IC,faldl'y^'t, . K>.^'(^ \^c" W^f /II200 sv^l 'q^qr (1pf3^tT) aii^rw h-v* wtian^rwqw '*» Deepti 5«i!tR+fi?n 3II^T SB : Mon'Die snn maninara nionan 13.05-2011 Shri Somkant Verma, counseil Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemmej Leamed counsel for the petiti| petitioner, without affording any opp| notice, the recovery has been submitted that the payments wnich result of any fraud or misrepresentati| on the basis of fixation of pay mad4 paid the salary. He submits that the] covered by order dated 9/4/09 passe) Learned state counsei subnj position as iaid down in Annexure P/i Consequentiy, in terms of orc) is also allowed. The impi^ned petitioner is entitled to pension benef has already been recovered, the interest at the rate of 6% per annumj orfler to take recourse to Rule 65 of the Rii v with iaw, following the basic principlejs Ct)(<<tt1<fll 'RW^ff ^f "fe^ <P*1^1< ^arRn SII^T snnvastava.J. |for the petitioner. (rt Advocate for the State. ilsner submite that after retirement of the i^rtuntty of hearing or gMng show cause orc|ered against the pet'rtioner. It is also vjiere made by the petitioner, were not the i|on on the part ofthe petitioner and it was by the respondents, the petitioner was jissue involved in this petition is squarely ^ in W.P.fS) No.267/09 (Annexure P/3). |its that he does not dispute the iegal $. jer passed in Annexure P/3, this petition orc|er of recovery is hereby quashed. The Fits without any deduction. If the amount pe1(tioner is entitled to the said amount with However, it is open for the respondents iles of 1976, if so advised, in accordance iplejs of natojrai justice. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge