IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8732 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 17, 2011. Tarsem Lal .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.5.2011 (Annexure P-7) whereby he has been transferred from Divisional Office, Gurdaspur to the Chakdar Sub Division, Gurdaspur. The challenge to the petitioner's transfer is on two folds. Firstly, it is urged that the petitioner is nearing retirement and left with two years and one month service and therefore, the transfer is contrary to the Government Policy. Secondly, it is urged that only the Chief Engineer of the Department is competent to transfer the petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. From the impugned order, CWP No.8732 of 2011 [2] it appears that it is not a transfer case rather is a mere adjustment within the Drainage Division, Gurdaspur. Be that as it may, the petitioner may represent before the Higher Authority who may consider his case sympathetically within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 17, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE