IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1034 of 2011 Satish Kumar @ Parmanand Rai, son of Kapildeo Rai, resident of village- Basanta Jehanabad, P.S. Lalganj, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. … Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar … Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 24.11.2011 The accused- petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order dated 20th June 2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Vaishali at Hajipur in Cr. Appeal No. 9 of 2011 by which the order dated 11.3.2011 passed by learned Principal Member, Juvenile Justice Board, Vaishali at Hajipur in Trial No. 498 of 2011, G. R. No. 3542 of 2010 arising out of Lalganj P. S. Case No. 236 of 2010 under Section 376 I.P.C. has been confirmed and the appeal has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been declared a juvenile and his prayer for bail was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board vide order dated 11.3.2011. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Cr. Appeal No. 9 of 2011 which has been dismissed by the impugned order on the ground that the petitioner has committed the rape of a girl 2 aged about six years and he was arrested on the spot and if he is released, he would be exposed to moral, physical and psychological danger. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.9.2010. Learned counsel for the State submits that a report has been called for from the Probation Officer which has been received vide Letter No. 443 dated 22.10.2011 and is against the petitioner. It has also been found that the tendancy of the petitioner is likely to be maintained and he will be exposed to moral, physical or psychological danger. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties and after considering the material on record, it appears that the contention of learned counsel for the State is correct. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This revision application is dismissed with a direction to the learned Juvenile Justice Board to expedite the trial. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)