IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2009 SHRI. APOLONIO LUIS ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Applicant in person, present. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 27th April, 2009 P.C.:- Heard the Applicant in person. He has declined to accept legal aid offered to him. In this application, the Applicant who is Complainant in C. C. No.18/2007 has challenged the Order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 21-1-2009 upholding the Order of the learned J.M.F.C. declining to issue process against the accused. The statement on oath of the Complainant was recorded by the learned trial Court on 5-2-2008 and after considering the same the learned trial Court declined to issue process against the accused persons. The learned Additional Sessions Judge by Judgment dated 21-1-2009, inter alia, observed as follows:- "Even otherwise only suspicion is shown by the Complainant that the five to six persons were sent by the accused No.1 to kill him and the said suspicion is without any basis. There is prima facie nothing on record to connect the said five to six persons with accused No.1". The statement on oath of the Complainant shows that there is a property dispute between the Applicant/Complainant and the Respondent/Accused No.1 and the Police has chosen to initiate Chapter Proceedings under Section 107 of the Code, against both. The Applicant submits that he had seen five to six persons, when they were sent by the Respondent/Accused No.1 to kill him when they banged the door of the house. However, that is not the case of the Applicant in his statement on oath. Both the Courts below have declined to issue process against the Respondent/Accused No.1 since they have come to the conclusion that the Complainant's case is based on suspicion alone. The conclusion is reasonable and cannot be faulted. There is no substance in this petition. Consequently, the same is hereby dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.