SlNGLE BENCH e^L^ / BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P/S) No. 6\<^ /2010 PETITIONER .^•^^r. ^^^^y:~ ^t^nrw--^^:.{.l Smt. Rudrani Diwan, aged about 51 years, W/o. Late Shri Chandandhar Diwan, R/o. Civil Line Simga, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS pres®ltw'u: .....^S-<1 dated..••••••""" RESPONDENTS :1 The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Joint ' Director, Urban Administration and Development, Subhash Stadium, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Municipal Officer, Simga Nagar Panchayat, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. -HC—78 A MWfM ^h^f^ '3'^r '^TPTI^R, yTi1-H<i<o, fsi<ni<-i^< ^.....u.-..e..-.w...(^?,.i^^o 3T^T T5PF (yif^^T) 3T!^?T ^T I^ThF TT^TT 3?1^T'87RN? 'r- <st<ll<tR ^ffe? 3Tlt^ SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITJ 26.10.2010 counbel Shri Ramakant Pandey, » Shri Ajit Sin^., P. L. for the S1 Grievance of the petition.er in she is working since 1991, but till d the post of Assistant Teacher. Counsel for the petitioner s the petitioner dated 18.1.2010 and respondents but till date the same jusfcice would be ser^ed if directic pending representations ofthe petifc State counsel submits that representation along with the copy decided by the respondents in accc ofthe facts. . Accordingly, the petition is petitioner to make a representatioi period of fchree weeks from the date in turn it is expected from the autt within a further period of two montl It is made clear that this CG} on merits of the ca.se and the to decide the sat-ne strictly in aufchclrity accord&.nce <i4)l<4fd^1vi ^R^f"? "fe^ if^l^K ^3ff?R3^T NKBR DEWAKER for the petitioner. ate/resps. 1 & 2. the present petition is that though 3-te she has not been regularized on ibmits that the representations of 16.2.2010 are pending before the hiave not been; decided an.d ends of a may be issued for deciding the oner. let the petitioner make a fresh >f this order and the sanie would be rdance with law after due scrufciny iisposed of with a direction to the before the resps. 2 & 3 within a of receipt of oopy of this order and ority concerned to decide the same IS. irt has not expressed any opiiiion rity concerned would be at liberty with law. ——- Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge