...S^I^S. ^^"^^t^i?.^'--" ftos^5'•" ,6?.!..?--' idSi r:- ^-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FCHHATnSGARHI WRTT PETITIONrSINo.: / 2010 S.B. PETITIQNER: - Smt. Vandna Pandey, Age- 39 years, W/0- Shri Devendra Pandey, By Post -Lectrur, Posted at Govt. Balak Higher Secondaiy School-Gariyaband, Block Gariyaband, R/0:-Panjabi Colony- Near Rly. Station, Mahasamund Distt. Mahasamund [Chhattisgarh] -:VERSUS:. RESPQNDENTS: - ^ i. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. TIie Asstt. Conitnissioner, Deptt. OfTribal Welfare, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3. Assitant Director[Sahayak Sanchalak], Tresury 6s Accounts, District - Raipur [C.G.] ?»/ 4. The Principal, Govt. Balak Higher Secondary School- Gariyaband, Block Gariyaband, District - Raipur [C.G.] WMT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE coNSTrrunoN OF INDIA FORTHE ISSUANCE OF DIRECTION fS) OR ORDER fS). The above named petitioner mostxesnecifi-JJ- under:_-_ "-HC—78 3II^iqfff?aRi ^qisn^iwRN; 'TST '^WKf'ti, WViwiQ, F^i^W^ ., V^-P.(£.j^.ZM^ho •OT^T TR?T (i^cjf.jat^tl) TRtWnfStt 3iT^I SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 21-07-2010 Shri J. A. Lohani, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing petituner is entitled to benefit of tw. ^rafera^ wwiT-ir Iwt ^R^( ^aiRrasn^i Shrivastava. J. -awyer fbr the State/respondents on for the petitioner submits that the 3 advance increments on account of she having passed B. Ed. examinatii^n before her appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue 2009 011) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furth involved in the present petition is no longer resMagra and the same ha^ been finally deoided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ash^ Saxena vs. State of M.P. S Ors., pr submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his oijder dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned cfounsel for the petitioner further draws attention ofthis Court to order dat^d 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying uip(\ in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) | another Writ Appeal No.87/2009| consideration of the case for gran| circular dated 21-09-1974 issued b| \n the judgment of the Supreme Court |and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advance inorements as per 1 the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts pteaded in th|e petition. Learned counsel for the re^pondents submits that case of the petitioner would also be consklered|on the same lines. gRH '.^ 6 ''e ^ A 1^.:.: -jg<^i%.>, '~:-w-f1' •^ :-si?"XI-HC—78 ^"T •<<l^iy<<, fftll'H'IS, f°<WI'(Hy,< VNj.?.(s,j rw-'^u><-^3^|o OT^T 'q^T ('i^l'l^S1!) sil^iw^iN; wnsn^ignw Tumane TCIIWBfeian^i disposed of with a direction to the res| decide the claim of the petitioner for ^ <^i<it<?wt*l 'RR^ff '£?TS^ ^l'fr^R ^sifinan^i n view of the statement m^de above, this petition is finally wndent authorities to oonsicter and irant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued] by the State of Madhya R-adesh, after verification of the weeks from today. after verification of the facts pleaded irji the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge