IN THE HIGH COURT OF J‘UDICATUBE AT JABALPUB wRIT PETITION No. lgé %' /98 Petitioners 1. WP. Rajya Beej Evam Farm Vikas Nigam, through its Managing Director, E—1/88-A, Arera Colony, Bhopal (M.Pa) 2. The Managing Director, M.P. Rajya Beej Evam Farm Vikas Nigam, Eu1/88—A, ,Arera Colony, Bhopal (Mob) 3 >. The Farm Man agar , M.P. Rajya Beej Evam Farm Vikas Nigam, Pokhara , Distric t Baipur (M.P .) —Versus— Respondents : 1- Raju Yadav son of Lala Ram and 36 other s through Satendra Hath Sadhu President, Chhattisgarh Krishi Evam Van Karmachari Shramik Sangh 25/12, Nehru Nagar (Pashchim) Bh uai (1vi.P.) The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Raipur (M.P.) Xl-HC-78 10. l 1 . 2005 Shri B,D, Guru, coullst 1 for tho pe’miom‘rs. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, a Lazmlsc1 coullsel for t1 pmsent pEtiticn was; iiléd ag 263,98 passed in Casa NS. for tha patitioxwrs furtllar s1 has been disposed of on 21.! bECQme infructuous. Learn réspond€11ts does not disputg In vitaw of the. above, t1? bacome infractuous. >unse1 for the respondentS. 1s petitionsrs submits that the 1;"3M-m ainst tho impugnedkord‘er dated §3,1!D Actf97. Laaulad counsal 1bmits that the main case itsslf 3.2001 as such this petition has 3d counsel appearing for the r. the fact. e petition is dismissed as-having Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge