IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4337 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.7.2011 *** Bhuri Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. Amrik Singh & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. S.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved with order dated 28.2.2011 vide which her application in the pending suit for registration of criminal case against the defendant Amrik Singh and one Nirmal Singh, who appeared as his witness i.e. DW3 for giving false evidence and making impersonation, has been dismissed. Heard. The perusal of the impugned order reveals that the impugned application has been dismissed on the ground that the power of attorney of Bhuri Kaur i.e. plaintiff on whose instance application has been filed was not on record nor Bhuri Kaur was present. In other words, the said application has been dismissed without touching the merits of the case, on mere technicalities. In this view of the matter, the petitioner, if so advised, can file review of the impugned order after complying with the necessary directions or to resort to any other remedy permissible under law before the trial Court, rather to file the instant revision petition, straightway. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 20, 2011 Jiten