g1»? XI—HC—78 . 29 w-P- L3) bwt' wk 31mm (Wt?) 1 ' K mw m WW trmrvif ‘ fsétm ‘ l ammm SE : HQN’BLE SEER} JUSTECE §RITINKE§ DIWAKER 24.97.2999 " ‘ “‘ W1 x Shri Dhaniram Patel, couqsel for thé’ petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, PL. for the State‘. At the outset, counsel far the pétitidner wants to Withdraw the present petition with liberty to Ede representation to respondent No1 8g 0, He further submits 'thai the direction may be issued to respondent No.1 & ’2. for om‘xsidering the representation of the petitioner in‘accordance With law and after due apptication of mind.‘ Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the representation of the petitioner is decided by the competent authorities. Aecordingky, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuaiity of filing any such representation by the petitioner the same is expected to be deeideciby the competent authority expeditiously in accordance with iaw. it is made Clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits and the authority Wouid be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. mm zoo ?