1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1844 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1844 OF 2011 *** 1. Contending that facts necessary to show territorial jurisdiction of M.A.C.T., Majalgaon were inadvertently accepted, written statement was sought to be amended to show that as victims were residing elsewhere that Court had no jurisdiction. The Court has considered necessary material and found no justification for moving such application belatedly. 2. Learned counsel before this Court has urged that there is no admission on record but statement has been made inadvertently by learned counsel representing petitioner before the trial Court. He is relying on judgment of this Court in the case of "Twist Spin Industries V/s KMH Enterprises" reported in 2009 (4) Bom. C. R. 216 to urge that mistake of Advocate cannot be permitted to cause any injury to his client. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1844 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. The application for amendment does not blame Advocate at all. Trial Court has considered necessary material and its application of mind is also not perverse. There is no jurisdictional error. Hence, petition is rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:16/03/2011. ans/1844