CWP (T) No. 1605 of 2008. 24.6.2009 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. for the respondents. The petitioner had admittedly completed more than two years and three months of service at the present place of posting. However, Mr. Ramakant sharma, Advocate, submits that his client has to look after his old aged father, who is 74 years of age. The petitioner has failed to point out infraction of any mandatory provisions of law. The transfer order can be assailed only if there are mala fides alleged and there is infraction of any mandatory provisions of law. However, taking sympathetic view, the petitioner is permitted to make representation seeking his transfer to a place from where he can look after his father. In view of the above observations, writ petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to make representation highlighting therein the difficulties faced by him. The representation, after its receipt, shall be decided by the competent authority within a period of two weeks from today by a speaking order. Copy ‘Dasti’. (R.B. Misra), J. (Rajiv Sharma), J. June 24, 2009. (cr)