IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31722 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CLAUDIN, S/O.LATE JOSEPH PEREIRA, THATHAMPILLIL HOUSE, OPP.THEKKEPATTUPURACKAL TEMPLE, PRIYADARSHINI ROAD, NETTOOR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.MANU ROY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, MARADU PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANANGAD POLICE STATION. 3. STEPHEN SIMENTHY, THATTAMPILLIL HOUSE, OPP.THEKKEPATTUPURACKAL TEMPLE, PRIYADARSHINI ROAD, NETTOOR, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY SRI.S.CHANDRASENAN, S.C. R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31722 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, standing counsel for the first respondent as also learned Government Pleader for the second respondent. Notice to the third respondent dispensed with, preserving his right for re-hearing of the matter, if aggrieved. The petitioner says that he made Ext.P1 representation dated 24.10.2009 complaining that the third respondent is making a construction encroaching into a road. All that is required is for the first respondent to look into the matter and take care of the situation in accordance with law. This shall be ensured without delay, however, that any action taken shall be with notice to the parties, including the petitioner. It is clarified that this judgment is issued without prejudice to contentions of parties. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.11/11.