IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 33773 of 2008(S) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24/07/1908 IN IA 2827/08 IN OP.242/2006 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------------ RAMANAN, AGED 45, S/O.VIJAYAN, NJATTUVELI HOUSE, NELLAYIL VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR SRI.P.VISWANATHAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. SINDHU @ RAJANI, D/O.ILLIKKAL SUBRAMANIAN, MURIKUNGAL DESOM, VELLIKULANGARA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 2. MINOR SANAL KUMAR, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER SINDHU @ RAJANI, D/O.ILLIKKAL SUBRAMANIAN, MURIKUNGAL DESOM, VELLIKULANGARA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.33773 OF 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November,2008 JUDGMENT Raman,J. Petitioner is the respondent in O.P.No.242/2006, which is pending before the Family Court, Thrissur, filed by the wife for return of the gold ornaments and other articles. Subsequently, he filed a petition for compelling the wife for DNA test, which was dismissed by the order impugned in this writ petition. The Family Court found that the marriage as well as the paternity of the child was admitted in the written statement filed by the petitioner herein. As such the question of entertaining a doubt thereafter does not arise. This finding of fact recorded by the Family Court could not be successfully challenged before us. In the circumstances, we do not find any illegality in the order impugned in this writ petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge. kcv.