Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.M.P.(M) No.181 of 2010 with Cr.M.P.(M) No.182 of 2010. Cr.M.P.(M) No.183 of 2010. Dated of Decision: March 20, 2010. 1. Cr.M..P.(M) No.181 of 2010. R.K. Sood . …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P . ……. Respondent. 2. Cr.M..P.(M) No.182 of 2010. Navneet Sood. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. 3. Cr.M..P.(M) No.183 of 2010. Rita Sood. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Add. Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): The above titled bail applications are arising out from the same FIR, hence taken up together for its decision. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in FIR No.62/2010, registered on 25.2.2010 in the Police Station Kullu, H.P. under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The incident is alleged to have taken place on 25th February, 2010 and according to the prosecution case, there is a boundary 2 dispute and there are cross FIRs. The recovery of the alleged weapons of offence has been effected. Therefore, In view of this situation, apprehension of the petitioners in a non-bailable offence is reasonable. Accordingly, interim bail granted on 11.3.2010 is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions with the additional condition that the petitioners shall present in the court as and when required to do so. Petitions stand disposed of. March 20, 2010. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.