IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38081 of 2010 MANSIH RAJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.6.2010 in a case under sections 302 and 341 I.P.C. and section 27 of Arms Act. It is alleged by the informant that he found dead body of his son having gun shot injury.It is submitted on behalf of the informant that his son invested Rs.2.5 lacs in the partnership with the petitioner hence for misappropriation of the invested and profit money victim was killed. It is the case of the petitioner that the informant was Munsi in the business firm and who was carrying some amount when some miscreants shot him dead. F.I.R. and the impugned order reflect that none has seen the occurrence but only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner and his father. Learned counsel for the informant submits that though there is no eye witness to the occurrence but there is strong motive for petitioner to commit the offence. 2 Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties as well as the fact that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and circumstantial nature of the evidence, let the petitioner, Manish Raj, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Barh, Patna, in Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No.165/2010. Anilkr.sinha (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)