1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.1644/2008 Union of India & anr. V/s Bahadur Singh & anr. 6.11.2008 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Narayan Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Raghuvendra S.Rathore Mr.V.S.Gurjar for the appellants. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. Perused the order impugned. By the order impugned, the learned Single Judge of this Court has affirmed order dated 3.2.1992 passed by the Central Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that since it was a case of engagement on contractual basis, the Tribunal and learned Single Judge of this Court erred in holding that the concerned workman had already worked for more than 240 days in a calender year and, therefore, his termination was violative of the provisions of Section 25F of ID Act. On scrutiny of the materials on record and the orders passed by the Tribunal and also by learned Single Judge of this Court, it appears that the appointment of the concerned workman was not exclusively on basis of a contract, rather he had completed 240 days in a calender year and from time to time, he was disengaged and engaged also. Taking totality of the circumstances, therefore, learned Tribunal set aside the termination order and directed for reinstatement of concerned workman with all benefits. 2 In view of the facts and circumstances aforesaid and the reasoning assigned by the learned Tribunal and learned Single Judge of this Court, we hardly find any scope for interference. This appeal accordingly is dismissed. (Raghuvendra S.Rathore)J. (Narayan Roy)C.J. Parmar