IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38161 of 2009 MD.FAHIM @ FAHRIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 30.10.2009 Heard. The petitioner committed theft in the shop of the informant by removing Rs.1120/- from his cash box. The petitioner was chased by the son of the informant, caught and was handed over to the Officer Incharge of the police station with the written report. Multiple contentions have been raised, namely, that the FIR does not contain description of the denominations of the notes, that the son of the informant who is said to have apprehended the petitioner did not sign the seizure memo and further that it is a case of false implication for any reason. The court is not convinced about the contention. Considering that the petitioner was caught on chase and theft property was recovered, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected for the present. Petition stands dismissed. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)