IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2006. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4886 OF 2006. Saroj Lata D. Jain ... Applicant. V/s. Madhav Prasad Morarka ... Respondent. Shri K.Y. Mandalik i/b M/s Hussini Doctor for the Applicant. None for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 22.9.2006. : 22.9.2006. : 22.9.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard Shri Mandalik for the Applicant. None for the respondent. 2. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 25.4.2006, Shri Kurup learned Counsel appearing for the respondent was granted time to enable him to file reply to the civil application and oppose prayer (b). Shri Kurup has neither filed any reply to the civil application nor he is present today. In the absence of opposition, I see no difficulty in granting prayer (b) of the civil application in favour of the applicant. Accordingly, interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) is granted. The respondent is directed to pay all arrears mentioned in Ex.A to the application to the applicant within 8 weeks from today. 3. It is needless to mention that in terms of prayer clause (b), respondent shall deposit Leave and Licence charges on or before 10th day of each month, in default whereof necessary consequences will follow. Needless to mention that it would be open for the applicant-petitioner to withdraw the said amount of monthly leave and licence charges. 4. Civil Application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)