-^.^ ^ctS> ^^^•>"'1 G^ /e^ llill r. P. (S) No. ^3^/2009 Kartikram Nag S/o Late Ramlal Nag Age about 41 years, R/o Dalpat Sagar Ward, Jagdaipur (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K..S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G) The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (C.G) The Secretary, MataRukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C.G.) ^^' CONSTTTUTEON 3. OF.CHHATTISGARH_:Aii.ASPUR , KartikramNag (£) Versus State of Chhattisgsrh & Others (Writ petition under Artlcie 226 of the Constitutjon of jndia) Singte Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihc-tn, J. Present: - Shri S. P. Kaie, counsei for the pefifioner. Ms. Smita Ghai, Panel La\werfor the State. (ORALI (Passed on this 18th day ofSeptember, 1. With the consent of iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the petltion is heard finaliy. 2. Learned counsel appeanng for the petitioner submlts that the instant petitjon is squarely covered by the declslon of this Court rencjered in Smt A. La!l v. of Chhattjsgarh & Others', thus the petltioner may be permitted to make a representatlon to decide his case in the light of afore-stated decision, subject to verjfication asto whether the respondent No.3 Institute is a Government aided schooi and the petitioner is a teacher wlthln the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned counsei appearing for the State submjts in the event, the petitjoner makes a representation, the wijj be considered and decided, in accordance wlth law, withln a. period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 4. In-view of foregolng, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitloner, nothing survives in thls for adjudication. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Tumane Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2007 (I).BU 265 1