IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3658 of 2009. Decided on 17th June, 2010. Dev Raj …. Petitioner Vs. State of H.P. and others ..... Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. P.S. Negi, Advocate. For the respondents No.1 to 3: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurain Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The petitioner has challenged his transfer vide order dated 25.9.2009 transferring him from Government Senior Secondary School, Pangi, District Chamba, H.P. to Government Senior Secondary School Lahaul & Spiti mainly on the ground that the transfer is from one tribal to other tribal area. During the pendency of the writ petition, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been accommodated at Government Senior Secondary School Purthi and therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders is required to be passed in this writ petition. However, learned counsel for the 5th respondent points out that 5th respondent has been disturbed from Government Senior Secondary School Purthi and transferred to Kangra only to accommodate the writ petitioner. That is independent grievance to which the 5th respondent is at liberty to take appropriate 2 proceedings. However, in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, it is made clear that in the event of 5th respondent making an appropriate representation before the 2nd respondent pointing out his grievance, the matter will be duly considered by the 2nd respondent within two weeks in accordance with law and justice, taking note of the fact that it is a couple case. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application, if any. Copy be given ‘dasti’. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 17, 2010 ‘brb/awasthi’