IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.129 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2200 OF 2008 Bubnal Gram Vikas Seva Sanstha Maryadit, Bubnal and another ... Appellants Vs State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. V.K. Chaudhary i/by Mr. Pratap Patil for the appellants. Mr. V.S. Masurkar, Government Pleader with Mr. S.N. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & V.M. KANADE , J. DATE : 23RD JUNE , 2008 P.C.: Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 6th May, 2008 vide which the learned Single Judge declined to grant any stay against registration of the society and directed that they may be permitted to carry on their business to the restricted extent in the order. 2. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the parties have stated that this appeal should be disposed of by consent order. Agreed terms are that (i) the respondent-society will seek no advantage of the ad-interim order dated 2nd May, 2006 and will not claim any equities during the disposal of the motion finally by the learned Single Judge, (ii) Their registration and carrying on business in terms of the ad-interim order shall be subject to the final order that may be passed on the disposal of the motion finally, and (iii) the liberty be given to the parties to make a mention before the Hon'ble Single Judge for an early disposal of the notice of motion keeping in view that the very purpose of approaching the court may be frustrated because of undue delay. 3. Various grounds have been raised to show that the revisional authority's order upsetting the order of the two authorities by additional condition at the stage of arguments was not proper in law. Be that as it may, without dealing with any contention on merits and without making any observation, we dispose of this appeal with the consent terms reproduced above. We request the learned Single Judge to expedite the final disposal of the motion at his convenience expeditiously. Liberty to mention. The appeal is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.