IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1875 of 2010 alongwith CWPs No. 1876, 1877, 1878 and 1879 of 2010. Decided on 7.5.2010. _________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 1875 of 2010 Prem Lal …Petitioner Versus State of HP & Anr. …Respondents 2. CWP No. 1876 of 2010 Milap Singh …Petitioner Versus State of HP & Anr. …Respondents 3. CWP No. 1877 of 2010 Anupama Kanwar …Petitioner Versus State of HP & Ors. …Respondents 4. CWP No. 1878 of 2010 Amar Dev …Petitioner Versus State of HP & Anr. …Respondents 5. CWP No. 1879 of 2010 Pradeep Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of HP & Anr. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Rupinder Singh, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl AG, with Mr. J.K. No. 1 and 2. Verma, Dy AG. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CMP Nos. 2837, 2839,2840, 2843 and 2845 of 2010. Allowed. The applications are disposed of. CWP No. 1875 of 2010 alongwith CWPs No. 1876, 1877, 1878 and 1879 of 2010. These writ petitions are filed with the identical prayers and the main prayer reads as follows:- “(i) By way of writ of mandamus may kindly be issued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and other similarly situated TGTs for being promoted to the next higher post at par with the Political Science Post Graduate TGTs as per seniority with all consequential benefits, such as seniority, arrears from the date when junior persons in Political Science has been promoted to the next post.” 2. It is seen that he petitioner(s) have represented their grievances by way of Anexure(s) P-1, representation(s) before the first respondent. There will be direction to the first respondent to look into Annexure(s) P-1 and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law and justice, adverting to the contentions taken by the petitioner(s). This shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition. 3. Any promotion, if made in the meanwhile, will be subject to the decision thus taken by the first respondent. 4. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 7, 2010(k/s) (Justice R.B. Misra) Judge