Crl. Misc. No.M-28016 of 2011 (O&M) Gunni Parkash Vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G., Haryana. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.152 dated 31.07.2011 registered under Sections 182, 211, 196, 201, 307 IPC and Sections 25, 54 & 59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula. On 15.09.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner was shot and instead of taking action against the assailants the police has now projected that the petitioner suffered the injuries himself to pressurise the assailants and the learned Additional Sessions Judge has blindly endorsed this biased opinion of the police even though the medical records would indicate that the injuries are not self suffered. Further that the petitioner has been hospitalised since 31.07.2011.” Learned Assistant Advocate General on instructions from S.I. Virender Singh has argued that these assertions are wrong and in fact the petitioner did suffer injuries by friendly hand. Be that as it may, the fact remains that except for the petitioner nobody else has been injured in the present case. Crl. Misc. No.M-28016 of 2011 (O&M) -2- In the circumstances, without going into the merit of the case, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on bail. Ordered accordingly. In the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 21, 2011 JUDGE ashish