In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6873 of 2008 (O&M) Satpal @ Bittu and others ..... Petitioners vs Hazrat Pir Baba Sanet Shah Wali Memorial Trust (Regd.) ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. P. K. Longia, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. N. S. Dadwal, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 7.9.2007 passed by the learned courts below in an application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Briefly, the facts are that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners/defendants from interfering in the peaceful possession of the respondent and with the working of the Trust namely Hazrat Pir Baba Sanet Shah Wali Memorial Trust (Regd.) near 14 Type, PAU, Ludhiana (for short, 'the Trust'). The trial court accepted the application for interim injunction and appeal filed against the same was dismissed by the learned Lower Appellate Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that it is a case where respondent Sain Prem Singh wants to misappropriate the property of the Trust. He had filed the suit against the newly elected members of the Trust without even the resolution of the Trust though suit was filed on behalf of the Trust. The suit itself was not maintainable as it would be barred under Section 92 CPC as it is a case of dispute amongst the trustees. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in a subsequent suit filed by the respondent, the learned court below had appointed a receiver who is taking care of the collection at the Mazar and the same is being deposited in a bank account. Accordingly, there is no question of misappropriation of any collection made by the respondent. Keeping aforesaid facts in view, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order where the apprehension of the petitioner is that the respondent will misappropriate the collections of Golak. The petition is dismissed. 30.4.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge