(”gm/ab, IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONS) No_.LI_{6 L/201‘1. 1/ PETITIONER: Lala Ram Rathiya, son of Late Budulu Rathiya, aged about 49 years, working as Waterman, Govt. Middle School Sonbarsa, Tahsil Kharsia District Rajgarh, Chhattisgarh. verSL‘IS (W ...... _ ’ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tn'bal Development Department, D.K.S..Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Respondents s i, Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3.( Assistant Commissioner, Raigarh, Tribal Welfare Department, District Raigarh, Chhatisgarh. // 4. Shyam Sundar Patel, Son of Jageshwar Prasad, aged about 38 years, Assistant Grade-3, Govt. ‘ Office of the Block Office Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhatu’sgarh. (r x t \ X WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ period of four weeks from today a respi No.3 shall decide the expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Cox on merits of the case and the aut to decide the same strictly in accor ong with copy of this order, the in accordance with law as It has not expressed any opinion ty concerned would be at liberty ance with law. Sdl— Prit'mker Diwaker Judge s i h e m $§§§ mm (Wu) mm“ *‘“"’¥‘L§-‘§§§W 3.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRIT INKER DIWAKER 03.08.2011 Shri Harish Khuntiya, counsel fer the petitioner. Shr‘i N.Naha Roy, PL, for the State/reaps. 1 to 3. Grievance of the petitioner i1 the present petition is that he was appointed as Daily Wage emp oyee on 8.10.90 but till date he has not been promoted to the post c f Assistant Grade Illt According to the counsel for 1he petitioner, resp. No.4 is junior to him but yet he has been promotei ahead of the petitioner, Counsel for the petitioner su omits that he has already made a representation (Annexure 13/5) on i4.1.2011 but till date the same has not been decided by the resp. 0‘3. He submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition ith a direction to the resp. NO.3 to decide his pending representatio . State counsel submits that let the petitioner make a fresh representation to the resp. No.3 Wi in a period of four weeks and in turn the same would be decided in ccordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn In the eventuality of making fresh repres tation by the petitioner within a