WP(C) 453/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has called in question th e selection and appointment of the respondent No.5 as the MMR and Kazi, Katigora h in the district of Cachar. According to the petitioner, he being meritorious a nd experienced than the respondent No.5, he ought to have been selected. There i s no allegation of any malafide exercise of power and / or violation of any stat utory provisions of law. Both the candidates duly participated in the selection and it is only after selection of the respondent No.5, the petitioner has challe nged the selection. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.2, it has been state d that the selection was made on the basis of merit and available materials. Alo ng with the counter affidavit, the minutes of the meeting of the Permanent Commi ttee has also been enclosed. On perusal of which it appears that the Committee i n consideration of all relevant materials, duly selected the respondent No.5 as MMR and Kazi. Needless to say that the Writ Court cannot sit on appeal over the findin gs recorded by the Selection Committee in absence of any allegation of malafide exercise of power and / or violation of any statutory rules. It is for the exper t body like the Selection Committee to make the selection in accordance with law . In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and a ccordingly it is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.