IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 21ST MAGHA 1931 RP.No. 1035 of 2009(W) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25222/2009 Dated 20/08/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HAIMA BENEDICT,W/O.BENEDICT, RESIDING AT PARAMBILOTH HOUSE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR RAILWAY GATE, ATLANTIS,ERNAKULAM. 2. BENEDICT, RESIDING AT PARAMBILOTH HOUSE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR RAILWAY GATE,ATLANTIS,ERNAKULAM. 3. MARY DASAMMA,W/O.(LATE) JOSEPH, ODATACKAL HOUSE,FORT KOCHI VELI,KOCHI-01. BY ADVS. MR.K.B.SAJEESH, MR.M.JITHESH MENON, MR.R.RAJESH. RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 4 & 5 IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOSEPH PETER HOBINE, ODATACKAL HOUSE,9/53-A,VELI,KOCHI-4. 2. O.S.BABY, VELLUTHAMMANUGHAL HOUSE,9/53 A,VELI,KOCHI-01. 3. CELINE, ODATACKAL HOUSE,9/53A,VELI,KOCHI-01. 4. K.R.PETER, PRESIDENT,PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION, EDWARD MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, FORT KOCHI,RESIDING AT H NO.12/11, SANJEO PAATTAM,KOCHI-01. 5. THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REP.BY THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN,ERNAKULAM. 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF COCHIN,FORT KOCHI,KOCHI-01. R1 TO R4 BY ADV. MR. DINESH R. SHENOY R5 & R6 BY ADV. MR. C.M.SURESH BABU, SC, COCHIN CORPN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.1035/2009 in WP(C).25222/2009-W = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th day of February, 2010. O R D E R Mediation report received. The plea of the petitioners in the R.P., who are respondents 1 to 3 in the writ petition, is that they were not heard while issuing the judgment sought to be reviewed. In fact, their right to seek re-hearing was also preserved. It appears that nothing worthwhile has happened and it is necessary that the review petitioners are also heard before the writ petition is finally disposed of. Accordingly, the judgment dated 20.8.2009 in WP(C).25222/2009 is recalled and the writ petition will stand listed for admission. If any action has been taken on the basis of the recalled judgment, such action shall be treated as provisional and there will not be any further RP1035/09 -: 2 :- enforcement. The review petition is allowed accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/1902