IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1505 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 8, 2010 Gurdhian Singh ..Petitioner Versus Baljit Kaur. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Nand Lal Sammi, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. Vide the impugned order, the learned Trial Court granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.1500/- per month in favour of the respondent – wife. The learned Trial Court proceeded on the premise that the petitioner-husband, being an able-bodied person, would be expected to be earning at least a sum of Rs.3,000/- per month. In the absence of any material to quantify the exact income earned by the petitioner- husband, his earning capacity would be deemed to have been assessed as that of a daily wager. Besides being an interim fixture, the amount cannot be said to be excessive. Dismissed in limine. March 08, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge