IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC.G.1 CIVIL REVISION N0. /' z—^OF 2010 APPLICANTS Defendants 'i^y '• . ^^ ^;;-^-^ NON-APPLICANTS: Plaintiffe 1. Shambhuram, S/o Ramkumar Sahu aged about 30 years; 2. Satanand, S/o Ramkumar Sahu, aged about 26 years; 3'; Lachhan, D/o Ramkum&r Sahu, aged about 19 years; Dujbai, D/o Ramkumar Sahu,aged about 22 years; Sy'' Smt. Bimlabai, Wd/o Ramkumar Sahu, aged abouf 49 years; 5< Ramchnad S/o Sukal Sahu, agecf about 55 years All are Resid^nt of Village Heerapur, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) ; VERSUS Ramadhar, S/o Sukalu Sahu, aged about 65 years, Rambai, Wd/o Ramgulal, aged about 53 years; Yuvtibai, D/o Ramgulal (W/o Ageshwar Sahu), aged abQut 36 years, R/o Village Jagleshwar, Tahsil and District Rajrtandgaon (C.G.) -. : ': : : 1 ^ B. •r:"1 '. ^ 4. Kalabai, D/o Ramgulal Sahu, aged about 34 years; 5. Rajesh, S/o Ramgulal Sahu, aged about 32 years; 6./ Harishkumar, S/o Gamgulal Sahu, aged about 30 years, Respondent No. 1, 2, 4 tp 6 are R/o Village Heerapur, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) .?. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, Durg District Durg (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OFTHE CODE OFCIVIL PROCEDURE ^ XI-HC—78 31^1 W R-fi'* WT Srff^T sn*i|cj-. °5^ ^ ^ •/^01 ^ 3^1 ^WWi, Q^WKa, fadl-M^ ^........l.^.J^lls... an^i TPR? (ljcifl»i<IEr) ^irar ^ift? SD^T SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. 08.07.2010 Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel Shri Vishnu Koshta, co Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy Leamed eounsel for court.to withdraw the civil regarding maintainability ol eventuality arises. 1 for the applicants. ijunsel for respondeats No. 1, 4, 5 and 6. G.A. for the State/respondent No.7. applicants seeks permission of the rejvision with liberty to raise the question the suit,in the appeal, if any such the "M^itrt-'fll TTTTI^ff ^f fe1^ '^I-^IT ^sifinaii^i Sd/- prashantKumar judge Misbra '^Silt^^ BR! 1 ail^iwfew wn sii^iwriv '^ ^ST -*<w\vff, 8>'a)'M<i<o, faldl'My .]M..LL..is^l./.L *<l*«llfl»*lic(> """"""""""""""""""""""""""•^200 311^?? 'VfV ('j^f^'^t) wnw^iftg sirtsi Hon'ble Shri Prashant Ktim; i Mishra, J. 26.08.2011 CivilRevisionNo. 12/201 8/07/2010 withliberty to raise of the suit, in the appeal, if an; the later part ofthe order the could not be mentioned, ther^ submitted for appropriate orderj Having perused the rec<| Revision No. 12/2010 be trea1|ed liberty mentioned in the order Office reference stands |0 was withdrawn by the appBcant on ijhe question regarding maintamability such eventuality arises. However, in o^erative order dismissing the revision sfore this office reference has been €i>i<litn<(i1i^wv^^ fe^ <f<<^K ^" 3ff?FT 3D^T kd it is now directed that the Civil as dismissed as withdrawn with ated 8/07/2010. isposed of. Sd/- P.K.Mishra Judge cns 1 <lTA*Tg5?IIRRT, -^; -FS/140—2/20tl—1,50,000.