IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-8926 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 29, 2010 Mohammad Iqbal .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Director General of Police, Haryana, Panchkula, is directed to look into representation, dated 24.12.2009, Annexure P4, in accordance with law, already made to him by the petitioner for taking action against respondent no.5, Sh.Dinesh Kumar, Station House Officer and respondent no.6, investigating Officer, Sh.Kallu Khan, Head Constable. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Director General of Police, Haryana, Panchkula, to look into the representation, dated 24.12.2009, Annexure P4, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner, in accordance with law, 29.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge