IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13947 of 2008 SHEIKH MOHAMMAD SULEMAN KADRI S/O LATE SHEIKH MD. WALAYAT HUSSAIN R/O MOHALLA LALGANJ P.O. DALMIANAGAR P.S. DEHRI DISTRICT-ROHTAS. …………………Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. BIBI ROSHAN ARA W/O MD. KURAISHI NAZFI, 3. MD. KURAISHI NAZFI S/O ABDUL HALIM, R/O VILLAGE 2 AND 3 HIRDAYCHAK P.O. HIDAYACHAK P.S. ARWAL DISTRICT-GAYA (now Aurangabad) A/P JAKHIBIGHA (Dihari) P.S. DIHARI DISTRICT-ROHTAS, 4. MUGAL JANKHAN S/O GAFUR KHAN, R/O JAKHIBIGHA (Dihari) P.S. DIHARI DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ………………..Opposite Parties ----------- 02 09.12.2010 The petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.02.2007 passed in Complaint Case No. C 1152 of 2007, whereby, the complaint of the petitioner was dismissed on the ground that the matter relates to civil dispute and the order dated 29.03.2007 passed by the Learned District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Criminal Revision No. 65 of 2007 has also been challenged, by which he refused to interfere with the order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sasaram. From the impugned order dated 13.02.2007, it appears that the complainant in his statement on oath has specifically stated that he filed the present criminal case for recovery of his money. There is admitted civil dispute between parties. Utilization of criminal forum for redressal of civil dispute has been deprecated by the Apex Court in case of Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC India Ltd. And others reported in 2006(2) SCC 736. Since complainant himself admitted that complaint has been filed for recovery of money, this Court finds no infirmities in the impugned orders. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)