THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.3188 of 2009 Dated 10th June, 2011 Between: T.Ekambaram …Petitioner And The Government of India, rep.by its Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.Srinivasa Rao For Sri K.Venkatesh Gupta Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud Counsel for respondent No.2: GP for Industries & Commerce The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondent No.1 in not fixing any date for hearing and disposal of the Revision Application and Stay Application in File No.2(3)/2008-RC-II in spite of lapse of 6 months, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and has the effect of violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondent No.1 to dispose of the Revision Application in File No.2(3)/2008-Rc-II, filed by the 4th respondent.” At the hearing, Sri K.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel, representing Sri K.Venkatesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.4137 of 2009 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th June, 2011 VGB