if Cq/z mV IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR glgl— i/ WP N 2003 M‘ MW LEM: m AWITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/0R _ ORDER(S), AND/0R DIRECT10N(S) IN THE NATURE OF WRITS T.S. GAUTAM, SON OF SHRI VIJAY RAM GAUTAM, AGED 49 YEARS, WORKING AS SURVEYOUR, OFFICE OF ‘ CENTRAL AGRICULTRUE 7 DEPARTMENT, DHAMDA, “ .3 DISTT. DURG [C.G.]. PETITIONER VERSUS I. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY ! GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT DKS BHAWAN, RAIPUR, [C.G.] «“3‘.‘ “258“‘i ..-' 2. THE COLLECTOR, DURG. ‘y THE W’° V , . TEHSILDAR, DHAMDA, ‘ c f ED gISTTmURG. QPY RESPONDENT; XLHC 78 /? mam Hfsa 311w 21-11 -2gn3 " WW§$¢W $Wm The case of ‘1'he peti'l'ione $hri Sanjay K. Agmwal, Sfa‘re/respondeMs. Hear-d ba‘l'h The counsel. By fhis pefifion filed under India, The peTiTioner seeks To ch Henge The in-acTionon The parT of respondenT No.3 in noT issuing The c Te cerTificaTe To The peTiTioner. Scheduled CasTe communiTy and h ing casTe cerTificaTe issued by The The petifioner V was working as Surveyor in AgriculT e DeparTmenT in The STaTe of MP and on bifurcafian of fhe Sfa're of M.P allocaTed7h/The STaTe of ChhaTTisg h and since 2000 offer coming inTo force of The STaTe of C5. The peTiTi ner is working as Government ServmT in The 5fafe of Chhtm‘isgarh and Surveyor in The River- VoHey Project, rTicle 226/227 of the Consfifufion of W}m “Pg— esen‘rly The peTiTioner is working as p isTricT Durg and a cerTificaTe To ThaT effecT is Annexure-P/Z. The peTiTio er belongs To JaTav casTe which falls under The Scheduled CosTe as per a endmenT made in III Schedule in The ConsTiTuTion of (Scheduled CasTes) O der 1950 and ersTwhile STaTe of MP. has issued a casTe cerTificaTe in favo r of The peTiTioner. i WW“ i Deputy ‘Advocafe 6ener-alr for The is Tha‘r fhe pefifioner b’elongs To . fhe pefifioner's services came fa be 3a W, my W > Wmwp3Q/%Z\O%im avast was}: (We) Shri Prafulla BharaT, counsel Tor The peTiTioner. V Tehsildar DisTricT Bhind, Madhya P adesh, Annexure-P/l. Xi-HC-22 mm§fwm $a1ia'qaném On 6-5-2002 fhe pemioner respondenf No.3 Tehsildar, Dhamdha refused To issue a casfe certificafe reason bes‘r known +0 him. On 15-9—2 Sub Divisional Officer for issuan Divisional Officer has advised the pet tioner to meet the Tehsffdir Dhamda) District Durg and give reference of circular dated 28-7-2003 issued by the Siafe Government buffhe respondev of The pe'iifioner. Learned counsel for The pefi‘ Tehsildar be direcfed To decide expeditiously in accordance with low to make an application hefore respo Advocate General has no objection. Having heard the learned co , the petitioner is allowed tornake an application for issuance of the certificate before respondent No.3 Tehsildar within a period of 10 days applied for casie cer‘rificafe before District Durg, bui- the Tehsildar has in favour of the petitioner for the 3, the petitioner has approached the of caste certificate and the sub it No.3 is not considering the request iioner submits that respondent No.3 the application of the petitioner and to that effect he may be allowed nt No.3 to which the learned Deputy u the facts and circumstances’of the in turn respondent No.3 will decide the application of the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of 3O d s from the date of receipt of the application and while considering th applicationrespondent No.3 will take into consideration his earlier applicati n which is lying with him. l for the parties and having regard to e \ h c , n e d XLHGZZ WW WW mmrmyfa pew-ion is disposed cf; also sfands disposed of. Parties are enfi‘rled for cerfi ied copy of This order. Wifh These observafians, wri Consequen'rly, I.A. Na. 9617 i sdl— L.C.BHA9°° Jué’gyéf / 3