- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (St.) No. 8492 OF 2009 Mrs. Hira Shankar Bhoir & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Mrs. Nira Pandurant Patil & Ors. ... Respondents *** Mr. Ramesh Dube-Patil, for the Petitioners. *** CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JULY 31, 2009. PC :- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are appellants in the Second Appeal No. 948 of 2007, which has been summarily dismissed by an order dated 17th January 2008. The submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is that the main contention which was raised in the Second Appeal was whether the suit property can be said to be ancestral property and the same has not been considered by this Court. 2. I have perused the order dated 17th January 2008 passed in the Second Appeal. The said order discloses that only contention which was raised by the petitioners/appellants was that the appellants had proved the will dated 27th September 1996, - 2 - executed by late Dharma Patil. Apart from the said contention based on the will, no other contention was raised, and the said contention has been dealt with by this Court after perusal of the evidence. 3. As the contention which has been raised in the review petition was never argued in the Second Appeal, there is no merit in the review petition and the same is rejected. Sd/- [ A. S. OKA, J.]