IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33150 of 2011 Laxmi Das, S/O-Mohan Das Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03 13.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but allegedly, in course of investigation the sim of looted mobile as well as some ornaments were recovered from the house of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, nothing stolen article has been recovered either from the house of the petitioner or from his conscious possession. It is further contended by him that according to prosecution case itself, the gold ornaments were looted from the house of the informant whereas ornaments of silver were recovered from the house of the petitioner and so far as recovery of sim is concerned, the same is nothing but only the highhandedness of the police. It is further contended by him that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and he has been implicated in this case on village politics because petitioner and informant are co- villagers. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 2 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 04 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)