IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.424 of 2008 DEO NARAIN MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 9.4.2009 The petitioner, who is the informant, has preferred the instant revision application against the part of the judgment dated 10.1.2008 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.IV, Araria in S.T.No.408 of 1991/Trial No.62 of 2004, arising out of Araria P.S. Case No.139 of 1989, whereby the learned trial court has acquitted the Opposite parties 2 to 3 for charge under sections 307 and 379 of the Penal Code. The trial court has discussed the evidence of the informant Deo Narayan Mishra, who was examined as P.W.1, in paragraph 8 as well as the evidence of eye witnesses Chandranand Mishra and Birendra Kumar Mishra. The trial court noticed that though the allegation is that the accused assaulted the petitioner on his face by torch, but the Doctor has not found any abrasion on the right cheek of the petitioner. On these basis, the trial court came to the finding that no case under section 307 of the Penal Code is made out. The trial court further found that the allegation of snatching of wrist watch worth Rs.500/- was also not substantiated in absence of any mark of scratch on the wrist or on the hand. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the materials on record, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment dated 10.1.2008, passed by learned Addl. - 2 - KHAN Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Araria. This revision application is accordingly dismissed. (S.P.Singh,J)