1 51 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4561/2005 Date of Order ::18th September 2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Harish Purohit for the petitioners Mr.N.M.Lodha Additional Advocate General for the respondents Though posted for orders on application seeking amendment in the writ petition, however, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and for the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal. Though the petitioners have made the grievance in this writ petition in relation to the definition of ex-serviceman as provided under the Rajasthan Civil Service (Absorption of Ex- serviceman) Rules, 1988 when it excludes the ex-servicemen from availing the benefit under the Rules before one year of their actual date of retirement particularly with reference to the provisions contained in the Ex-serviceman (Re-employment in Central Civil Services & Posts) Rules, 1979; but having regard to the fact that the issue was raised when the petitioners were denied consideration as ex-serviceman in relation to the vacancies advertised on 02.06.2004, and selection process under the said advertisement has already been completed, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the 2 petitioners shall stand advised to make a proper and comprehensive representation stating all of their grievances and propositions before the State Government; and the Government may consider such representation particularly for the reason that the Rules as framed by the State Government do not stand in parity with those framed by the Central Government though both the Rules operate to achieve the same object and purpose, that of providing reasonable opportunities of re-employment to the persons retiring from military services. Thus, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Learned Additional Advocate General in all fairness, does not oppose such proposition of the petitioners withdrawing the writ petition and making proper representation to the Government. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the writ petition and the same is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioners shall be at liberty to make proper representation; and it is expected that as and when such representation is made, the same shall be considered by the respondents objectively in accordance with law. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. s.soni