\^ u'\ (^; IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. ( ( °) 2_ OF 2005 PETITIONER: Smt. Brijwati Matlarri( w/o Shri R.S. Matlani aged about 30 years, at Present working as a Asst. Teacher Primary School, D.P. Colony Kondagaon Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :,ISjy/''1- state of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Department of Tribunal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Tribal Welfare Departnient, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). ^< <?' tftfX'L:^' 3. The Asst. Cominissioner, Tribal ^.r*^*' F-^/ \^^ Welfare Department, Jagadalpur ^'^•-' \ V ^ ' %v>'- •V s^^ ^- ^- 4. Dist. Bastar (C.G.). The Collector, Bastar at Jagadalpur District Bastar (C.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, Bhanu Pratap Pur, District, Kanker (C.G.) ^ 6. District Education Officer Jagadalpi.u- Dista-ict Bastar (C.G.) i!n":''i-ra III l^i!!-! ^%) XI-HC-22 siT^rw f^iwan^T sh*<icbgfer o1-. 3^ ^frar?pr, sntfl.M'iis^ isicilyy 3iK^l 4S)tb UJ.^.NO, tl°]2-^yor~ *<i*<ni »»*<)<»»"•••""•••••••••••• H?f 200 (^M""""" 3< 1^1 g'KllWSdff 31.03.200S Shri Vishnu Kostha, Shri U.N.S. Dc State/i-espondents No. 1 fa Heard. Leamed counsel fc petitioner was transfen] (Aanexiu'e-P/ 1). Her uaiat said order. He further sui tTaiisferred on the said d; Firsfly her order was lcept| elections but even .after c| regardnig relieviag is be Leamed counsel for tiie p| order has not been canceBI Leamed counsel foj this Court bas passed au 4396/2004 in relation to order Iias been filed as order in this petition also. State counsel is notl Adinittedlv now elet coinpleted and fKere ma^ petitioner, ifthe traiisfer c|i It is ordered that if not been canceUed so fat »i<it<i4)-iKitidTfffa<<!) {Kw< ^sri^rsn^T 'counsel for tbe petitioner. o,. Govt. •rf Advocate for 6. the \t the petitioner subinits fhat fhe 'd vide order dated 21.8.2003 ts find place at serial No. 45 of fhe ^iaits fhat fhough'^fhe petitioner was te, but she has not yet been relieved. lin abevance on account of assemblv biapletion'of fhe election, no action ing taken by coaceraed authority. etitibner inakes a stateineht fhat the ed so far. the petitioner further submits that order dated 15.12.2004 in W.P. No. imilarly placed person. A copy offhis toiiexure-P/5. He prays .for siaular opposiag fhe aforesaid prayer. 'tions of Vidhan Sabha have been not be any. lizu-dle ia reUeviag the -der is weU in force. the impugned order of transfer has and the same is ui 'force, fl^eit tly -w XI-HC-22 :3n^r?;r K-ii+an^T a><ii<n ylSn Sf>([W *11*<CTI <SfiW<K 5s?'<iNi<'i<<, d^nwis, Ris'iwy 3iici?i ^aqi ^ , _ . ?.?,^o. f(5^/2^S •••^200 ftre% petitioner shaU. be relieved date ofproduction ofcopy4 If fhe order of traat changed, the order passed Witib. the aforesaid t fiiiaUy disposed of. Consequently, M.W.{ 2334/2005 also stand dis^osed CertiSed copy as per ^vifhin. a period of 3 weeks from. the Q< jif fhis order. ^fer has been caaceUed/altered or t>v this Court shaU have no force. [observations, fhe petition staads qiiqfd'fl-l HIICTTff fel<fl <Rl+<ill ^iSlf^HW^T P. No. 957/2005 and I.A. No. o£ : rules. Sd/- sun»K«m»s»h. Judge