.@ $§3§$§J£ gEmH G ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.[C] No. Q $2V) [201g Hari Prasad Gupta S/o Late Ram Sundar Sao , aged about 75 years R/ o Ward no. 3, Main Road Jashpur Nagar , Distt. &Tah. Jashpur [C.G.] ' PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,L/State or Chhattisgarh, through the ' Collector Jashpur, Collectorate Jashpur , [C.G.] 2. ”/The Sub Divisional Officer Jashpur ,‘Distt. Jashpur [ C.Gi] 3. /The Tahsildar , Tahsil Jashpur , Distt : Jashpur [C.G.] g/V 4. The Chief Municipal Officer , Nagar Palika Jashpur Nagar [C.G.] : 5. Shekhar Gupta S/o Krishna Gupta Aged about 41 R/o College Road Jashpur Nagar Tah. 85 Distt. Jashpur [C.G.] WRIT PETITION’AIU 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner beg to submit as under :— “ / IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.6824 OF 2011 @ PETITIONER Hari Prasad Gupta Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Wril Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri N.K. Maiviya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri v.v.s. Murthy, Dy. Advl General Govt. Advocate fo o R D E R (Passed on this 15m r the State/respondents with No.1 Shri to 4. Arun Sao, day of December, 201 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the (Annexure — P/1) and if necessary fresh notice will be issued, in accordance with law, after demarcation of the property in dispute. ln view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearin for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. H g