IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 2731 of 2003 Date of decision: September 30, 2008 Smt. Murti .. Appellant v. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. H. S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Rajiv Kawatra, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Ashok Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.3-HSIDC Rajesh Bindal J. The land owner is in appeal before this Court against the award of the learned Court below for further enhancement of the compensation of the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 15.11.1994, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act'), State of Haryana acquired 1490 acres 2 kanals and 6 marlas of land situated within the revenue estate of Village Manesar, Naharpur Kasan, Khoh and Kasan for setting up of Industrial Model Township, Manesar. The same was followed by notification dated 10.11.1995 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') determined the market value of land at Rs. 4,13,600/- per acre. Aggrieved against the same, the appellant filed objections which were referred to the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, upheld the award of the Collector. Learned Advocate General appearing for the State very fairly submitted that the claim made by the appellant in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court in R.F.A. No. 2699 of 2003-- Pran Sukh and others v. State of Haryana and others, decided on 19.5.2006, where on account of acquisition of land vide same notification, this Court assessed the value of the acquired land @ Rs. 15,00,000/- per acre. For the reasons stated in Pran Sukh's case (supra), the appeal is allowed in the same terms. (Rajesh Bindal) 30.9.2008 Judge mk