mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2225 OF 2008 Kamaluddin Musa Pandhare Petitioner versus Abdulla Ali Sakharkar & ors. Respondents S.B.Shetye for petitioner. A.I.Bhatkar for respondents 1 to 45 H.J.Dedhia, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd April 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for respondents 1 to 45 and learned APP for the State. The compromise purshis signed by the advocates for the petitioner and the contesting respondents as well as the petitioner and some of the respondents is placed on record. The compromise purshis is marked "X" for identification and is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the compromise, the petitioner does not desire to proceed with the petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Ad-interim order stands vacated. (A.S.OKA, J.)