IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 318 of 2008 Dr. Varun Kumar …….. …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and three Ors. ....……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Present: Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Date of Decision: 24.02.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that he has been instructed by the petitioner to withdraw the instant writ petition. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is, however, necessary to direct the respondents not to draw any adverse inference merely because he has approached this Court through the instant writ petition. (Sudhanshu Dhulia,J.) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 24.02.2010 P.Singh