IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21284 of 2010 Date of Decision : November 30, 2010. M/s Shiv Durga Foods and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Modi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.K.D.S.Sidhu, DAG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.K.D.S.Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to issue notice to respondent No.4 nor any counter reply from respondent Nos.1 to 3 is needed at this stage. The petitioner-rice mills are said to have applied for allocation of paddy for custom milling for Khariff Season 2010-2011. It is averred that the claim for allocation of paddy stands answered in their favour vide order dated 12.1.2010 (Annexure P-10) passed by this Court in Civil Writ C.W.P.No .21284 of 2010 2 Petition No.16795 of 2009 (M/s Pooja Rice Mills versus State of Punjab and others) and other connected matters. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any views on the entitlement of the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioners' claim for allocation of paddy for custom purpose in terms of the order dated 12.1.2010 passed by this Court in M/s Pooja Rice Mills, case (supra), within a period of ten days from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. November 30, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE