IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9476 of 2008. Decided on: 27th December, 2010. Satish Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 2. : Ms. Bhavana Dutta, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner’s father had died in harness on 06.02.2003. Case of the petitioner has been turned down on 2nd September, 2004. No specific challenge has been laid by the petitioner to letter dated 2nd September, 2004. However, in the interest of justice, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the Secretary (Industries), Government of Himachal Pradesh for the redressal of his grievance within a period of one month from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the Secretary (Industries) by passing a speaking order, within a further period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 27, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -