IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7276 of 2011 MD. ZAMIL @ MD. ZAMIR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.04.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 447, 448, , 341, 323, 324, 325, 436, 380, 427, and 504/34 of the I.P.C. It appears that so far as petitioner nos. 1 to 4 are concerned the final form was submitted and differing with the same the cognizance has been taken, whereas petitioner Nos. 5 to 9 namely, Manuar @ Manuar Ali, Md. Hasim @ Md. Hasim Ansari, Shamshul Mian @ Shamshul Haque @ Samsuddin, Haseena Khatoon and Bibi Fatma were on police bail, the anticipatory bail application of Petitioner Nos. 5 to 9 is not maintainable. Let the learned Court-below pass appropriate order with regard to regular bail application of petitioner Nos. 5 to 9 in view of the ratio laid down in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh V. The State of Bihar reported in 2004(3) 2 P.L.J.R. 491 provided that petitioners have not misuse the privilege of anticipatory bail. So far as petitioner No.1 to 4 are concerned, since the accusation was found false during investigation and the final form was submitted, let the petitioners namely, Md. Zamil @ Md. Zamir, Ghazi Mian @ Gajee Mian, Md. Nabil and Husna Khatoon, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court-below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 18 of 2010 subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)