IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.33128-M of 2009 Date of Decision:26.2.2010 Mohan Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record the statement of the bank showing that they are regularly paying the installments. They further undertake to make the installments continuously. It is further stated that it is not the case of the bank that the installments are not being paid. Learned State counsel instructions from HC Chhinderpal states that the petitioners have since joined the investigation. Accordingly, order dated 4.12.2009 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 26.2.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE