1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.60 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2009 Smt. Suvarna Sujay Gavande Appellant Vs. Shri Sujay Vasudev Gavande Respondent Ms.Indu Varma for appellant. Respondent present in person. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. July 10, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard. The parties are present in person. 2. During the pendency of this appeal the parties negotiated and decided to reconcile. They have decided to come together and resume cohabitation as husband and wife. The settlement terms in the form of Consent Terms have been reduced in writing in Marathi and signed by both of them. They have verified these Consent Terms in the Court and stated that the consent has been voluntary and with the sole aim of resuming cohabitation as husband and wife. The wife has 2 agreed to join the husband at her matrimonial home and she is aware of the health conditions of the husband and the living conditions in or surrounding the matrimonial home. The husband in turn has agreed that the impugned decree of divorce be declared as withdrawn by dismissing M.J. Petition No.A-314 of 2007. 3. Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. Consequently the appeal stands allowed in terms of the Consent Terms and the impugned judgment and order passed by the Family Court is hereby quashed and set aside. M.J. Petition No.A-314 of 2007 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant – wife shall join her matrimonial home from tomorrow. Parties to bear their own costs. 4. Civil application does not survive and the same stands disposed. (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)