1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7723 OF 2011 Akhlakh Bashir Jahagirdar ...Petitioner Versus Vijaykumar Chaganlal Bedmutha & Others ...Respondents Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the Petitioner CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 18th OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. 1. Special Suit No.258 of 2010 is filed against the three persons in regard to the property covered by the said suit. The petitioner claims that he has purchased the said suit property covered by the aforesaid suits way back on 8.6.2009 by Regular Sale Deed from the persons who are shown as defendants in the aforesaid suit. On this ground the application was made for being joined as party defendants. This application is rejected by learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Solapur by order dated 21.2.2011. 2 2. This order dated 21.2.2011 is challenged in this petition. 3. I have perused the record and in particular written statement filed by the defendant nos.1 and 2. In the said written statement dated 9.11.2010 categorical stand is taken that the land is already sold to the petitioner and others and that the said suit is illegal. It is also averred that the defendant nos.1 and 2 are not the owners of the land in question. This will clearly go to show that the persons who are shown as defendants are defending the suit and they have admitted that they are not owners of the property. Surely, if this contention is reiterated by the defendants in the trial Court, the learned trial Judge will consider the said material and even otherwise since the suit is not filed against the petitioner, if the decree is passed the said decree will not be binding upon the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid observation, I am of the view that there is no reason to interfere with the aforesaid order. 4. Hence petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)