IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1438 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 24.9.2009 Partap Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus G.L. Goomer ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.22843-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1438 of 2009 Vide order dated 3.11.2008 passed by this Court in CWP No.18733 of 2008, the respondent was directed to take a final decision by passing a speaking order on the demand notice (attached as Annexure P- 11 with the aforesaid writ petition) The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that the respondent has taken no action on the demand notice of the petitioner in spite of the directions issued by this Court. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Sh.G.L. Goomer, Chief Engineer (OP) Uttrar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Shakti Bhawan, Sector-6, Panchkula, has been filed wherein it has been submitted that in compliance of the order passed by this Court, a speaking order dated 18.9.2009 (attached as Anenxure R-1 with the reply) has been passed. In view of the aforesaid stand taken, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. COCP No.1438 of 2009(O&M) -2- Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid order Annexure R-1 and seek redressal of his grievances by availing an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. September 24, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE