IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2008 PRADIP VASSANT SALELKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. AGOSTINHO FERNANDES AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Zeller D'Souza, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 28th August, 2008 P.C.:- Heard. The petitioner is plaintiff in R.C.S. No.156/2004 and has filed this petition against Order dated 8-8-2008 rejecting an application for amendment filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff by virtue of the said amendment application sought addition of certain facts in respect of a structure which was in existence from the year 1986 to 1988 much prior to the filing of the suit. Learned Counsel on behalf of the plaintiff states that this structure is not sought to be demolished, but the plaintiff only wanted to place certain facts regarding the said structure by way of clarificatory amendment. In case no relief is sought, one fails to understand what would be the purpose of bringing facts in relation to the said structure in the plaint. It appears that the plaintiff had subsequently filed two applications for amendment. The evidence of the plaintiff has already begun on 9-6-2008. Further granting of the said amendment was bound to delay the trial of the suit. There is nothing arbitrary in the impugned Order. Hence, no case for interference is made out in extraordinary jurisdiction. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.