1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH WRIT PETITION NO.2139 OF 2007 Sow. Urmila Devidas Waghmare- - Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and others. - - Respondents Shri A. V. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri V. D. Gunale, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V. B. Ghatge, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No.1. Shri S. G. Rudrawar, Advocate for Respondents Nos.3 and 4. None present for Respondent No.5. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated : 18th July 2009 ORAL ORDER [ Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] 1. Shri Rudrawar, learned Counsel appearing for management, on instructions, makes a statement that Appeal No. 477 of 2004 filed by Respondent No.5 Shantveer Dumne is allowed and is disposed 2 of. 2. Learned Counsel Shri A V. Patil submits that petitioner had also filed appeal before Tribunal which also came to be disposed of. The issues raised by the parties before this Court is as to who should be approved in service, Sow. Urmila Waghmare or Respondent No.5 Dumne. In the facts of the case, Education Officer, Secondary, would decide issue by passing a brief reasoned order as per law and after going through the record and individual approval of the petitioner and respondent No.5 Dumne. Though Respondent No.5 is served, none appears for him. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. 3. Authenticated copy of this order duly signed by the Sheristedar of this Court be provided to learned A.G.P. Shri V. B. Ghatge. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J. ) pnk/wp213907