LPA 206/2002 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 206/2002 Reserved on: 15.12.2008 % Date of decision: 19.12.2008 M.L.GIRDHAR …APPELLANT Through: Mr.Rishikesh with Mr.Rajiv Dewan, Advocates. Versus JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU UNIVERISTY AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.C.Dhanda, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest? SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 1. The present appeal is directed against the Order dated 16.08.2001 of the learned Single Judge (as he then was) in CM 4980/2001 in WP(C) 201/1999. The writ petition was disposed of by an Order dated 22.01.2001 on similar terms as the Order dated 22.01.2001 in WP(C) 3538/1999. The impugned order dated 16.08.2001 is also identical to the order of the same date passed on an LPA 206/2002 Page 2 of 2 interim application in that writ petition. That appeal has been disposed of by a separate order passed by us today. 2. Learned counsel for the parties did not advance any separated submissions in the present appeal but submitted that the present appeal would abide by the fate of LPA 2/2002 since the issues are almost similar. That appeal has been dismissed by us in terms of an Order passed today. 3. The present appeal is also thus dismissed for the reasons recorded in LPA 2/2002 and copy of that Order be also placed on the records of this file. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. DECMEBER 19, 2008 MOOL CHAND GARG, J. dm