or?“ V¢O// / 3mm ““9“ P E Na ........................................... ‘ 3 Presented by Shn Sr 30‘}; dated . . . . . . . . . . L l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH go K; WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2006 C9) / Chinta Mani Tripathi S/o PETITIONER: Bhagwa‘u Prasad Trlpathl, Aged about 49 years, Presently poste / i and worklng as Sub Engmeer Water Resources Department Sub D1v1s1on WI S angarh D1str1ct Ralgarh (Chhattlsgarh) d Versus RESPONDENTS : / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, the Department of Water Resources, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Under Secretary, Department of Water Resources, DKS Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Engineer-in—Chief, Department of Water Resources, Sihava Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Raigrarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ION OF INDIA / CONSTITUT XI~HC—78 W W , W , W m @Q.>.«.o.§.3.12§.... 1H 200 mm (W) $ 7 WWW wmm r‘ », Wimna‘ffifgd’rm Wmm ' $Wm 10.8.2006 Shri BD. Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj‘ Govt. Advoc ate for the State on advance copy. Heard. 30.6.2006 (Annexure P—1) whereby Water Resources Department, Saran arh, District Raigarh to Tribai Deveiopment Pilot Project Division, Jagdalpur, Basi . The main ground of chaiienge is that the petitioner has been subjected to frequent transfers, as within a short pan of two years the petitioner has been transferred thrice. Another ground is hat the marriage of petitioner‘s daughter is nxed in the month of February, 200? and vide impugned order the petitioner has been transferred at a distance of 400 k s. Therefore, iearned counsei or the petitioner submits that, circumstances, the petitioner may be respondent No.1 and in turn, he be dir cted to decide the same in accordance with iaw, to which Shri Bajaj, learned Dye G Vt. Adv, for the State has no objection Having heard teamed counsel or the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, witho t expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation to respondent No.1 raising ail the grievances within 10 da s from today along with copy of this petition and in turn, respondent N001 to decid the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of rec ipt of representation in accordance with law after considering aii the grievances ra by the petitioner With the direction aforesaid, th petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.31 3106 & 10A. No.7607/06 also stand disposed / Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge in the llowed to make a detailed representation to of. , PJTIU. By this petition, the petitione‘ has challenged his transfer order dated has been transferred from Sub Division, a f i d