IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 8792 of 2009 Date of decision : 17.01.2011 Risal Singh Walia ....petitioner versus State Information Commission, Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present : Nemo for the petitioner. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. for the respondents-State. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) A perusal of the record would reveal that as nemo appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 11.03.2010 and on 30.08.2010, therefore, the case was adjourned for today. Today, again no body is appearing on his behalf, despite the case having been called twice. 2. From the sequence of events narrated here-in-above, it appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the case. Therefore, no option is left with this Court except to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge January 17, 2010 naresh.k