IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25055 of 2004 Between: Medapati Lakshmi Narayana Reddy S/o Chandra Reddy R/o Basireddypeta, nidadavolu, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Level Committee, Sand Auction East Godvari, Kakinada 2 The Distrcit Level Committee West Godvari District Eluru 3 The District Panchayat Officer, East Godavari District 4 The Distrct Panchayat Officer, West Godavari, Eluru 5 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovvuru, West Godavari District 6 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Penugonda Mandal, West Godavari District 7 The Sub-Inspector, Penugonda P.S. West Godvari District 8 V. Saibaba Reddy S/o Jagadhal Reddy R/o Pekeru Eragavaram madnalam, West Godavari District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. G.RAJA BABU FOR SMT.N.SHOBA The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 4, 5, 6 & 7 in interfering in the sand quarrying operations of the petitioner in pursuant to the lease granted by the first respondent for quarrying sand in Reach No.42, Gopalapuram from Km.30/0 to 47/6, ramp 30/5 & 32/8, Kms. Gopalapuram, East Godavari as arbitrary, illegal, unjust without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice.” Sri G.Raja Babu, learned counsel representing Smt. N.Shoba, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 31.12.2004 is vacated and WPMP.No.32765 of 2004 is dismissed. WVMP.No.264 of 2005 and WPMP.No.2334 of 2005 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NARAGJUNA REDDY, J 24th June, 2008. kvni