URT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CO HRH PETITION PETITIONER / w 3mm BENCH (smo. 911W OF 200g / Santosh Kumar Sinha Son of Late RE§PONDENTS Shri Gorakhnath Prasad Sinha, aged about 33 years, Resident of Mahuapara, Fundurdihari, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. ‘/ State of Chhattisgarh, through: use the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2/ The Coiiector, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Sanjay Sinha, illegitimate son of Late Shri Gorakhnath Prasad Sinha, aged about 22 years, Occupation Business; / Ranjay Sinha, iilegitimate son of Late Shri Gorakhnath Prasad Sinha, aged about 20 years; .' Ku. Rekha Sinha, illegitimate daughter of Late Shri Gorakhnth Prasad Sinha, aged about 19 years; Respondent No.4 to 6 are permanent resident of Godhanpur, it Police Station and Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE'CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner Santosh Kumar Sinha Versus ’ Respondants State of Chhattisgarh 6r, others (Wxit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shn‘ Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn' M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 f9 3. O R D E Rioral} ( Passed on this 7th day of December, 2009 ) Heard. 1. Learned counsel appean‘ng for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take recourse to other forum that may be available under the provisions of law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/ State has no objection. 3. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above—stated liberty, if so advised. No order asto costs. fen; J U D G E