IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4049 of 2009 UDAY CHANDRA CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 04. 20.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A separate show cause has been filed on behalf of the Opposite Party Nos. 2,3 and 6. Today, a supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. It is submitted that the respondent – State had taken due action pursuant to the order of this court on the representation of the petitioner, as contained in annexure – 2, and necessary payments with regard to the provident fund dues to the tune of Rs. 1,17,044/- has been paid to the bank account of the petitioner, as would be appearing from the letter no. 1975 dated 22.12.2009, written by the Block Development Officer, as contained in Annexure –C, to the counter affidavit and for payment of the provisional pension, steps have already been taken as would be appearing for Annexures – A and B to the show cause. Considering the show cause filed, as referred to the above, this court finds that the action of the opposite party is not contemptuous and accordingly, this application is dismissed. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)