-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.611 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.611 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.611 OF 2008 Satish @ Satyanarayan Shreeniwas ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Vikas Shivalkar h/f Sachin Thombare for the Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 24,2008. : JUNE 24,2008. : JUNE 24,2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The Applicant -original accused has been convicted under section 436 of the Indian Penal Code. The Applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the Applicant had set fire to the door of the house of the complainant Smt.Madhuri. She is not an eye witness to the incident. It is the case of the prosecution that the son of Madhuri i.e. Sidharth Ashok Naidu is the eye witness to the incident. However, the said Sidharth has not supported the prosecution case. 4. Looking to the facts of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the Applicant. -2- 5. The Applicant - Satish @ Satyanaran S. Naidu be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant is directed to report to Yerwada Police Station, Pune once in a month till the disposal of the Appeal. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)