IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7560 of 2010 ANIL PRASAD @ ANIL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Section 366A of the Penal Code is that the alleged victim under Section 164 Cr. P.C. named one Baijnath Sah but makes no reference of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Bettiah, West Champaran, in Sikta PS Case No. 28 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)