IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2961 of 2011 Sabita Sinha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2. 23.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is aggrieved by discontinuance of her service as Shiksha Mitra, approached the various authorities of the State but no concrete result coming out of the same, she has ultimately come to this Court. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, she ought to have approached the statutory authority under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Teachers ( Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006, which is now District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority for redressal of her grievances. In case any such appeal/application is filed by the petitioner, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same keeping in view that the petitioner had been pursuing her remedy before this Court. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )