IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELVETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4612 OF 2010 Between : S.Mahammed Ali ... PETITIONER A N D K.V.Udayakumar and others …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4612 OF 2008 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 07.09.2010, in I.A.No.46 of 2010 in A.S.No.61 of 2007 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Cases-cum- Additional District & Sessions Judge, Anantapur, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to permit the petitioner to come on record as one of the respondents in A.S.No.61 of 2007, was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner purchased the property from respondent No.2, therefore, he has got some semblance of right to safeguard his interest. 3. On the other hand, the learned counsel for respondent No.1 contended that the petitioner has not filed any document to show that he has got prima facie title in respect of the property, therefore, the Court below has rightly dismissed the petition. 4. Under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) C.P.C., any party can come on record at any stage of the suit. In this case, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has got right, title and interest in the property. In such a case, the minimum requirement to be followed by the petitioner is to file copy of the document showing his prima facie right and title in respect of the property. The petitioner has not filed copy of any document showing that he has got prima facie right and title over the property. The petitioner failed to show that he got some semblance of right over the property to come on record so as to safeguard his interest in the controversy in the suit. In the absence of prima facie title his presence in the suit is not necessary. Therefore, the Court below has rightly dismissed the petition and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J NOVEMBER 12, 2010. YVL