1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 216 OF 2007 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 122 OF 2006 Varsha Bhagwantrao Jadhao Now Varsha Rameshrao Thakre Vs. Ushatai Tanaji Wagh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P. B. Patil Adv for petitioner. Mr. V. G. Wankhede Adv for respondents. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 14 th JULY, 2010. Heard extensively. The order dated 22nd April 2010 recorded by the Brother Judge in unmistakable terms direct the respondent- management to make payment for the wages of the Assistant Teacher for the period from 10th August 2006 to 17th April 2007. Para 6 records, a statement was made by the learned counsel for the management on 8th April 2010, that he would be advising his client to make payment and hence two weeks time was 2 granted for seeking further instructions in the matter from 8th April 2010. It was assured that he would remain present on the next date. The personal attendance of the respondent is exempted for this date. With all said and done, further additional affidavit tendered vide No. 5238 of 2010 need no reconsideration of the controversy as the earlier orders coupled with the orders dated 22nd April 2010, will amount to review by this Court. Respondent is duty bound to comply the orders in its letter and spirit without deviating the same adding spices for no reasons. In the result respondent to ensure remitting the arrears to the petitioner treating her as Assistant Teacher, which has not been controverted by the respondent. S. O. for payment to 27th July 2010. Respondent no.1 shall remain present on that date. Respondent in addition shall pay costs of Rs. 5000/- to the petitioner. JUDGE svk 3