IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.392 of 2001 (M/B) (Old No. 19588/97) 1. Baru Singh s/o Sri Kalu Singh 2. Roop Ram s/o Sri Kalu Ram 3. Subhash Chand s/o Sri Satyapal Singh All residents of village Aatmapur Bongla, Post Vahaderabad, District Hardwar …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of U.P. through the Secretary, Public Works Department, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow. 2. The executive Engineer, U.P. Rajkiya Setu Nirman Nigam, Hardwar. 3. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Nirman Khand I, Roorkee, Distt. Hardwar 4. The Executive Engineer Uttarakhand Ganga Nahar, Sichai Vibhag, Roorkee, Distt. Hardwar ………. Respondents ………… Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 13.06.2006 13.06.2006 A