CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33161 OF 2000 ---- In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. ---- RAMESH PASWAN SON OF MAHENDRA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAINPUR, POLICE STATION SADAR, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SITARAM YADAV SON OF SRI PREM LAL YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE POSUA PATANIYA, P.S. RIGA, DISTRICT SITAMARHI, AT PRESENT BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BENIPATTI, P.S. BENIPATTI, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 3. KULANAND JHA SON OF SRI KAMLA KANT JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHITH BHAGWANPUR, POLICE STATION MADHEPUR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the petitioner : None For the State : Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. ---- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ---- Rakesh Kumar,J. Today again, when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. On 22.7.2010 also, none had come forward on behalf of the petitioner, when the case was called out. However, the case was adjourned for a day with an indication that no further adjournment shall be granted. 2. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal 2 Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 18.9.2000 in Cr. Revision No.323 of 1999 passed by Sessions Judge, Darbhanga. By the said order, the learned Sessions Judge has set aside the order dated 29.7.1999 passed by Sri S.C. Roy, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Darbhanga. By the said order, the learned Magistrate had summoned the opposite party nos.2 and 3 for facing trial on an accusation of commission of offence under Sections 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. I have perused the order of revisional court and materials available on record. I do not find any defect in the impugned order. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 27.7.2010 N.A.F.R./N.H.