IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18337 of 2009 1. SRI OM PRAKASH RAI S/O SHIKHARI RAI PROPRIETORS OF ONKAR NATH TRADING, R/O VILL- JASO ROAD, P.S- BUXAR (INDUSTRIAL), DISTT- BUXAR 2. ALAKH DUBEY S/O JAI NARAIN DUBEY PRORIETOR OF ONKAR NATH TRADING, R/O VILL- JASO ROAD, P.S BUXAR (INDUSTRIAL), DISTT- BUXAR Versus 1. CHIEF MANAGER,CANARA BANK PATNA, DISTT- PATNA 2. SENIOR MANAGER, BUXAR BRANCH, CANARA BANK, NAMAK GOLA, BUXAR, DISTT- BUXAR ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. B. J. Ojha. For the Bank :- Mr. Onkar Kumar ----- 4 29/03/2010 In absence of any legal infirmity having been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners with regard to the action taken against the petitioner under the SARFAESI Act, no interference is required in the writ application. The petitioner has liberty to either approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Bank to settle the dispute between the parties in view of the intent of the petitioner having been expressed in the supplementary affidavit. The terms of the settlement between the parties will have to be worked out amongst themselves. No judicial intervention is - 2 - required under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)