IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5863 of 2006 Date of Decision: February 07, 2011 Zila Parishad through its Chief Executive Officer, Ferozepur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. M.K. Saajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. G.L. Bajaj, Advocate, for respondent No.4. None for respondent Nos.5 to 8. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) CWP No.5863 of 2006 [2] 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that vide order under challenge, the proceedings were adjourned sine die till final adjudication by the competent authority in regard to ownership of the land in question and mutation proceedings. 2. Learned counsel further contends that mutation proceedings have assumed finality, in favour of the petitioner. In such circumstances, learned counsel contends that let the petition be dismissed as withdrawn to enable the petitioner to have the matter revived. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the Collector, Ferozepur, to have the matter revived for adjudication in view of the sanction of mutation. 4. Since the matter was adjourned sine die, Collector is directed to take up the issue and take a decision considering the later development as noticed above, after giving notice to the parties likely to be effected, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this CWP No.5863 of 2006 [3] order. (AJAI LAMBA) February 07, 2011 JUDGE avin