1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7471/2009. Bohra & Ors. Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors. Date of Order :: 29thJuly 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. J.R. Beniwal,for the petitioners. .... BY THE COURT: There appears absolutely no reason to entertain this writ petition against the order dated 18.09.2008 as passed by the Board of Revenue in Revision Petition No.4724/2003 declining to interfere in an order for temporary injunction as issued by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Barmer in Appeal No.10/2002 way back on 08.07.2003 while reversing the order dated 20.03.2001 as passed by the Assistant Collector, Gudamalani, Head Quarter Barmer. The learned Member of the Board has declined to interfere with the order as passed by the Appellate Authority essentially for the reasons that the rights of the parties would be determined only in the suit after evidence and admittedly the suit was proceeding before the learned Trial Court in plaintiff's evidence; and in the opinion of the learned Member, neither the impugned order was against the judicial principles nor there was any justification to vacate the temporary injunction as issued by the Appellate Court in relation to the 2 suit pending for last 10 years. The learned Member of the Board has, however, passed the order in the interest of justice that both the parties shall maintain status quo in relation to the property in dispute. The order as passed by the learned Member of the Board appears to be in accord with law and does not suffer from any jurisdictional error leading to failure of justice so as to call for interference in writ jurisdiction. This writ petition does not merit admission; and stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni