1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2010 (M/s. Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Ltd. vs. M/s. HRK Infra & Oils, Jaipur & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 05, 2010. Heard Shri Dewani, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Rizwy, learned counsel for the respondents. Shri Shareef, learned counsel has filed application for intervention on behalf of the Chief Manager, Allahabad Bank, Ambabari Branch, Jaipur. His contention is, Bank is aggrieved because of interim orders granted by the High Court. Shri Dewani, learned counsel is opposing the intervention. However, during the hearing it has transpired that the rejection of application for early hearing was by Presiding Officer and after Summer Vacation, on account of routine transfers, the Presiding Officer has changed. The counsel, therefore, state that whatever position is obtaining today should be continued for a short period and the prayer for interim order moved by the appellant should be permitted to be considered by the Principal District Judge. In view of the joint request made by the 2 learned counsel for the parties, it is not necessary for this Court to record any finding on the controversy. The arrangement as per interim orders of this Court dated 06.05.2010 to continue further for a period of three weeks from today. During said period, the learned Principal District Judge shall dispose of the prayer for interim relief filed by the appellant before it. The proposed intervenor – applicant Bank is also permitted to move appropriate application before the Principal District Judge in this respect. With these observations and directions, present Arbitration Appeal is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.