IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13000 of 2008 ================================================== 1. Md. Kamil Son of Seikh Abdul Haque, Resident of Village- Rukhwa, Post Office- Barhi bazaar, Police Station- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad. 2. Jash Matiya Devi wife of Ramdas Yadav 3. Radhika Devi wife of Rampati Yadav 4. Manmatiya Devi wife of Ramgati Yadav 5. Ram Lakhan Yadav son of Late Raghubar Yadav All are resident of Village-Simara, Tola- Jan Bigha, Post Office- Barhi Bazar, Police Station- Rafigang, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya 3. District Collector, Aurangabad 4. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Aurangabad 5. Chamari Vishwakarma 6. Chandradeo Vishwakarma 7. Suresh Vishwakarma 5 to 7 are son of late Ram Brichh Vishwakarma. And All are Resident of Village- Barhi Bazar, Police Station- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. O.P.Upadhyay (Sc(C)2) Mr. Ram Bachan Singh Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3. 25-04-2013 On call, none appeared on behalf of private respondents i.e. respondent nos. 5, 6 & 7, whereas, they have already entered appearance through their counsel. Learned counsel for petitioners and State are present. Petitioners, who are purchasers, have Patna High Court CWJC No.13000 of 2008 (3) dt.25-04-2013 2 / 2 2 approached this Court against an order passed by the Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya in Revision Case No. 67 of 2007 and order passed by the Collector, Aurangabad in Land Ceiling Appeal No. 68 of 2003. During the pendency of the present writ petition for adjudication of such dispute, a forum, as Land Tribunal, has been constituted and functioning under the provision of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’). Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion that this petition can well be adjudicated by the Tribunal. In view of provision contained in Section 15 of the Act, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Interim order of stay dated 14-05-2009 is made absolute, subject to any order passed by the Tribunal. Anay (Rakesh Kumar, J.)