-",t3 IN THE HIGH COUfi'1'OF CHHATTI_SGARH_AT_BILASPUR W.P.Ha. %9^ /2001, ^s;^ PETITIONER c'aSSPOHDENTS P.K.HBhanaa vs. Steel AuthBrity ®fInaia Ltd, and ethers. WRIT__PETIK[QN UNDER AfCTICLES 226/22Z_Og_THE _eON5'rTTiraiION QEINDIA DETAILS OF THE FETITIQN PAR'riCULARS OF THE PBTI'riONER; P.K.Mehanan, S/e Late Shri p.K.Krishnan, Aged ab®ut 45 years, privat.e Secrstary, P.Ns. 136231, Bhilai Steel PlaBt, Bhilai ..'ft •',,„<> aesiaent ®fQr.So. 4-A, Str®efe-l'%,gs^'^~ seet;®r-10, • ^,36--" Bhilai (Chhattisgarh). ^l^^^ ^^^•••""' ^ ',1'" PARTICU_L&RS.OF THE RESPONDENTSs 1. S-beel Auth©rity ef zadia Ltd,, Ihraugh its Hanaging DlE'ecter, Bhilai Steel Plants, Bhilai- 490001 (C.G.) Dy.Hanager(pers-GE) Bhilai Steel Piaat, Bhilai-490001, Dy.Manager(Pers-T&D) Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai-490001. PARTICUL&JRS OF THE OKDER ASAIHST WHICH THIS WRII PCTITIOH_IS _BBING _MABS_s s :? .XI-HC-22 *s~>;.. ' V—<2• •"- :: - -s^ •^l''<ld''<, •a'Awie, hwvy. •y •A W.P.No. 296/2001 'qixCTi arcirai "WL Isregs' a- "%-^4! '••^l sni?! ^r h-l s^V sh^i+ 'SfgV 12.4.2001. yfe^ 311^1 ^RIIW: ^rft?( PetitiQner by Shri P. Respondents by SJ-yn K^ Heard. s tha.n onei as The main grlevance of whereas he has c<Mnplate<} le| P»S. to Assisfcant Geaeral Mfl Plantt an order oS transferttamet.c^^AssA.ie'tfon 27.2.2001 transferriBg the writ petit4oner frca Bhilat Steel Plant to Rajhara.^»QnJ.the.;same day i.e.on 27.2.2001 «bl<if<'i^l'l ^WvS ^ 'fS'St <f<1«]< ^? 3Tf5gi( sil^r Diwakar, Advocate. nak TJ.wsri» Adwoeate. 1 ^. the petJ.ti0ner,"that nager atBhila.I. Steel _^. the petitibner was relieved On 7.3.2001 aotices were is^ A/2&A/3<aaled 27.2.2(] By,virttj p£:theaforesalcl4rcler the petitioner is t frosn BhilaJ. Steel Plant. ued retaEnable on 30th March,2Q01.^ On 7.3.2001 th^fol.j.owl.ogocder was passed_s "In the meantime, tber^ shall be ad-interlm suspension of ttae inp^gned orders (Annexures oiy." still cont.lnue";at"Bh.llai St^el Plant. ~^-'"~-~.^" ~v .. 1 Return has besn file^ on taebalf of the respondents. . :1 •• ~ , - ^ It has been cQBtended that c| at Rajbara a post pf Pri.vat^ •fsvm sonie niQnths ago«J'jlgain^ t the raew plaee of posting " -^fc? SecretaFy ^eriUAng vacant <^ t ttae sai.dpostof Private Secretary the writ petition^r-was transferred. Since tifae WElti petltl^oer bas ;beeia approactiing this t^^rt I!,! 11 'SB '11"N aii^l^ i<-il* 3WI Sll^Ct 4?1* ( lcli^qCtW ) sii^iWTrw^iN' Court on some OGCasioBSa ST.ipersessionand in aa .ijnterim order it was direGted that any proiaotion shal3| case was also sald to bel +.l''<f<'<41-( 'WRff tf' feAtf^RSIt ^aifigtian^ onee taking a grievance of be siibject to the final decision of the Court«3.t|at petitioa is pendtng. Anbther wr.tt petltlbw teas ailso ^iled ecaiplaining that 3the case ofttle'wrtt petlttoiier ii^s not consldered for promotion. The second petitlon is a]lso pfenai.ng for dlsposal. Another pendl.ng before the Labour Goart for Boia-eons^a8rat|iDn 6£ the writ petitioner for granf of Servicg awa|ra fbr long service. That n>a1;te"i;t'alsd stlll penaii^g. Xccprdinci to Mr. Diwakar '":>-;:...: ' ^,:;f .._/^yl -,-.- ^.: : ^.;'•:-:'..' -: .; the iBipugned order ol •yeansfer has been issued malafieS an& hot in tfie puB'liG injterest. There is a polic^t' pecte ^i order o£ transfer which ~^. gulaellne?/ tssiied as res| should iaormally be e££ec|;edafter five years or ten years as ^Ue case inaybe. It If that beso he cannot has been contravened ia The enipldyer kriows hew'b tnay be stated that the wr.i.t petitioner bas rertdered^ervicefor the lastabout 21 years at Bhilai Steel Pl^nt, He has not been transferred ^a4u^~' Bhilai. out to any other piace e^ccept ff^^^pB tbe/Steel Plant. the policy guideline jlssuing theorder of transfer. ^st the s^iTvlces of the employee wouldtee utilised. Ther^fore, ifSthe services of the petitioner/purpOsefully <itllisea at the hew place of '— ^ postirig, the wri€ pe€itl<pner cannot resisl,^-. Mr. Biwakar further submlts that thoijigh there are soiae otber persons tasyiag expeaience^and;ka<i>wJ.eclge^of the work of Private • GRPRI—FS/311—!/2001—50,000. XI-HC-22 an^r'qii h-u'h sni^i i^Hi^i ^rfi?f l,iJ!«:a»iA:iiSS' '»: ^'hakiiir ^^ •<ii'iici'Ii, »Til'u<i6, RyiKHy W.P.' >'/2 *<i*<Mi %iira) I^FB^T' 311^1'?RITWHf?g (Condt. 12.4.2001 ^f^ Secretary the writ.petition (Sf^^t- -^- linAi'n/- ^-— •fta-jttCtEW. f. It appears that again. some tijne only one person case tbe writ pe-bitioner ba| against the said vaeant pos| malafide in the facts and eanbe attribTited to tbe the order of transfer. Mr that oaee the writ petitioBl tiis cbildren who are stu<tyl| According to Mr. Diwakar wi| about the future o£ his ct»j| r-H to bring tbii @^"L"^^z^r^3 Sad not for this Coart to ^ la the result I am n4 the order o£ transfer. Th4 Certified copy, as p4; qiliiCT'fli ^mw ^ fs^S l<t«t^tR ^? •Sritftf 311^1 A^e,j(^J<~"<yc- r has been pitifhaS-te ^t one post whl.ch f^ll vacant rt^T b.^s td;picfeWl> In ttie pcesent ^. ^ v i^ been'direeted to proceed i|t at Rajhaca. In my vlew no ctircanstances of the case co|npetent autbority ia issuing Diwakar further submits^a- jer is posted'bftbe welfare of <^?*•.-» |ng in scbools would be affected. it petifcioner is very coacen \ - . ' -' Idrea. it is for tbe weit - fore the canpetent aathority* ive any directl.on in this regard. inelined to interfere with petition is rejected. ChiefJustice -\ [Tft^'^ftsi<i :v'^^