GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 361 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 361 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 361 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRI. CRI. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1384 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1384 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1384 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra .... Applicant versus D.N.Khedkar ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri B.H.Mehta APP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.C. V.C. V.C. DAGA, JJ. DAGA, JJ. DAGA, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 13TH JUNE, 2005 13TH JUNE, 2005 13TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Inspite of service of notice none appears. Hence delay in filing leave application condoned. Heard Ld. A.P.P. on merit. It is a case of pure appreciation of evidence. The trial Judge has taken a view that the prosecution has failed to prove the charges levelled against the accused persons. A different interpretation and view of evidence is possible. Merely because two views are possible of the evidence when one is in favour of the accused and is accepted by the trial Judge, no case is made out for interference merely because second view is possible. Hence leave rejected. ...