/ mOH COUR'J OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMTPETmONfS-) No. 1706 of2009 PETmONER : Shambhu Naiayan Singh S/o Late Shri S.P.Sitigli, aged about 52 years, Lab Technician (La2 Plant) Veterinary Semces, Ambikapur, Surguja(CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of ChhattisgaA throu^i the Seeretary, DiBpartaient ofVeterinary Services, ; Mantrataya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipw (CG) 2. The Director, Directorate of Veterinary Services Near Gunitej Bahadur Paik, G.E. Road,Raipur(C.G.) 3. Deputy Director. Veteriaary Services, Ainbikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4. Joint Director, Aceounts, Treasury and Petisioii, BUaspur, District Bilaspw (C.G.) WRITPETITIWTUNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITm'ION OF 1NDIA SB: Hoa'bte Sisri Safeh K. AeBBShotri. J. Present: Slm Rakcsh Andiony, Advocate for the petitioner. Siiri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate Oaieral with Ms. Siniita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the StrtB/raspoadeiits. ORALORDER (Passedon31stdayof Mareh,2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petttioner, oa instructions, subnrits that the petitioner does not want to conteit the petition on merits, however, prays that tiie respondent authorities may kmdly be (Mrected to consider and decide his pendiag representatiai (Aimeiau-e P/6) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate Oaierat appearing wilh Ms. Jain, leamed Paael Lawyer for the State/respondents submits that Ihat ifthe representation dated 09.05.2008 (Annexure P/6) is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law, <m its ovm merits, within a period ofeight weeks Irom today. 3. - In view ofthe foregoin^ according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition staads disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotn Jiidge Amlt