IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11282 of 2008. Decided on: 22nd December, 2010. Onkar Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking regularization. It is evident from Annexure R-IV that the petitioner had continuously worked for 9 years from 1995 to 2003 and had completed more than 240 days in each calendar year. 2. Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is still working and has completed 240 days in each calendar year. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization in case the he had completed 10 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year in view of the policy/notifications issued by the respondent-State, with all consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 -