'e^ RESPONDENTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.Gi MISC. APPEAL No. ^° $ 1 2003"Sini APPELLANT 'S^^MsS^"' l?^A*^iiil*'~- ^^'^, ^v^' Sudhakar, S/o. Shankar Lal Singhania, aged abour 43 years Occupation : Business R/o. Lailunga, P.S. Lailinga Tashil & District: Raigarh (C.G) VERSUS 3) Prem Lal, S/o.Netra Ram, Aged about 30 years R/o. Village-Lamdand P.S. LailungaJah.Gharghoda Dist: Raigarh (C.G) Minor Savitri, D/o.Kausalya Bai, Aged about 7 yrsjhrough Next Friend Grand Father-.Jageswar, S/o.Ganesh Ram.aged about 58yrs Jageswar S/o. Ganesh Ram ,Aged about 58 years Occupation-Cultivatrion R/o.Vill: Jhagarpur, Tashil: Gharghoda, P.S.Lailunga Dist: Raigarh (C.G) ^f Hardeep Singh,S/o.SumratSingh Aged about 50 years R/o.Rajapara, Raigarh Tahsil & Dist: Raigarh(C.G) The New IndiaAssuarance Co.Ltd. Branch Office - Sonaliya Bhavan, atSattigudi Chowk.Raigarh (C.G) MISC. APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 it(ili|j ..t>;a> ,!lTiiij iS""'^»te 1 •^—.^ij,g (^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR lyiSC, APPEAL N0.405 OF 2003 Sudhakar Prem Lal and others. Misc. Appeal Under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 (Sinqle Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K.. AgarwaL J.1 None for the appeliant. Siirl Anand Kumar Gupta, counsel for No.5. rth ! !j i. ". t The matter is called twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant. The appellant may not be interested in prosecuting the matter, 2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want:of prosecution. | g^_ N.K. Agrawal Judge