IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1692 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 07, 2011 Balbir Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Union Territory, Chandigarh ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Jangra, Advocate for Mr. D. D. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was a Conductor. Upon conviction, he has been released on probation by the Trial Court. The order was upheld by the Appellate Court. If this order will have any effect on the service of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to plead on the basis of Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act. Otherwise, no case for interference in the impugned order is made out. Dismissed. November 07, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE