IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 15608 of 1991 Date of Decision: September 14, 2011 Bhagwanti and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Haryana 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, learned Addl. A.G., Haryana states that the land of all the petitioners have been released from acqusition vide order dated 22.03.1999. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to move an appropriate application in case any mistake is found with regard to petitioner No. 20 Smt. Sona Devi w/o Ganeshi Lal Sharma. In view of the above, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and disposed of as such but it shall remain subject to liberty as has been prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE September 14, 2011 Atul