1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2011 (Abdul Rehaman .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Y.B. Mandpe, Advocate for the applicant. Smt. B.P. Maldhure, APP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri M.V. Samarth, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM : MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 15TH MARCH, 2011. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. A private complaint has been lodged by respondent No.4 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kelapur against the applicant. The said complaint is under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Magistrate has directed the police to investigate the matter under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though a large number of prayers have been made in the present application, learned Counsel for the applicant stated that at present he is not seeking for quashing of FIR or setting aside of the order directing the investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure but is only seeking prayer that in case if the charge sheet is filed then the investigating agency to give 72 hours' notice to the applicant prior to his arrest. Learned Counsel for applicant pointed out that at present the applicant is in service and he is working as SP (Railway), Pune. Looking to the above facts, we are inclined to grant the prayer of 72 hours' notice. Hence, it is directed that if the investigating agency comes to the conclusion that the custody of the applicant is necessary then it shall give 72 hours' notice to the applicant prior to his arrest. 2 The application stands disposed of accordingly. Interim relief granted by order dated 23rd February, 2011, stands vacated. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.