IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2768/2011 Date of decision: 28.04.2011. Jaspal Singh and others ....................Petitioners v. Rajbir and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.RK Sharma,Advocate for the petitioners. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Applicants/petitioners have filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 15.4.2011 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division)Amloh whereby their application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for being impleaded as a party has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the plaintiff/respondent no.1-Rajbir Singh has filed a suit for permanent injunction against gram panchayat to protect his possession over the leased land belonging to gram panchayat, however, after the expiry of the lease period still plaintiff/respondent no.1 has not been evicted. It is further submitted that the gram panchayat is in collusion with the plaintiff/respondent no.1, who is alleged to be in unauthorised possession after the expiry of the lease period. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners, I am not persuaded to accept the plea raised on their behalf. It is not in dispute that two of the applicants are ex- Sarpanches; two are residents of the village and Jaspal Singh is sitting Panch of the Village. In my view the learned trial court has rightly observed that the plaintiff in view of his pleadings that he is in possession of the suit property being a lessee and is seeking permanent injunction to protect his possession being threatened by the gram panchayat and if at all the petitioners have any grievance with regard to the connivance with the plaintiff, they have separate cause of action for which they are fully free to file a suit against the gram panchayat. Dismissed. 28.04.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge