IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29918 of 2009 1. SADHU SARAN YADAV 2. Pano Devi @ Paro Devi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 05.01.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of the petitioner no.1, inasmuch as during the pendency of the application, petitioner no.1 has been arrested. Accordingly, the application of the petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.2 is wife of Sadhu Saran Yadav, who is informant of this case also. In his fardbeyan, he has pleaded innocence but in course of investigation, informant and his wife (this petitioner) were found involved may be suspicion only in petitioner’s view but that goes against both the wife and husband. Death is inside the house. No alarm was made till presence of the miscreants. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)