IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2990 of 2010 UPENDRA PASWAN S/O LATE SONE LAL PASWAN R/O VILL ASHADHARPUR,P.O.THATAH BUJURG,P.S.HAJIPUR,DISTT-VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HEADQUARTER BIHAR,PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MAGADH RANGE,GAYA 5. THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE NAWADA ----------- 2 22.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the authorities should consider the payment of the admissible retiral dues of his father. It is submitted that despite the order dated 05.09.2008 issued by the Superintendent of Police, Nawada with regard to payment of provident fund dues, the same has not been paid as yet. It is further submitted that the father of the petitioner died leaving behind four sons as would be appearing from the certificate of the Circle Officer as contained in Annexure-3. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a joint representation before the respondent no.5 for payment of admissible dues of his father. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)