Crl.M.No.M-17088 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-17088 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 19, 2010 Islam .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.M.Anand, Add. A.G., Haryana. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.421, dated 7.12.2009, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 427, 452, 307 IPC, at Police Station Punhana, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 29.6.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.30622 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-17088 of 2010 Heard. Argues that no injury has been attributed to the present petitioner and that case of present petitioner is at par with Shokeen, who has been granted interim bail by this Court in Crl.M.No.M-15343 of 2010. Notice of motion for 19.7.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation Crl.M.No.M-17088 of 2010 (O&M) -2- on 12.7.2010 at 10.00 a.m. and thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer, and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. To be heard alongwith Crl.M.No.M-15343 of 2010.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 29.6.2010, granting interim bail to petitioner-Islam, is, hereby made absolute subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 19.7.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge