MGN IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION 154 OF 2006 PETITION 154 OF 2006 PETITION 154 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1945 OF 1998 PETITION NO.1945 OF 1998 PETITION NO.1945 OF 1998 Shri Pandurang Maruti Kumbhar ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors...Respondents Mr.Vinod YT. Jadhav, for the Petitioner Mr. V.P. Malwankar, AGP for respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO & REBELLO & REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 20TH APRIL, 2007 : 20TH APRIL, 2007 : 20TH APRIL, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Learned Counsel for the petitioner produces a sale deed of 7th May, 1980 in respect of Gat No.179. The Gat No.179 was considered for the purpose of working out the petitioner’s entitlement. If Gat No.179 was sold on 7th May, 1980 which is before the Notification under Section 11(1) published on 2nd July, 1981 that property will have to be excluded. In the light of that Review Petition will have to be allowed. The order of this Court dated 18th March, 2005 stands reviewed. In so far as para.4 is concerned the matter is remanded back to respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner’s contention as now set out in this order and if the petitioner had in fact sold the land to pass appropriate order according to law. The entire exercise to be completed within eight weeks from the date the petitioner serving a copy of this order on the respondent No.2. Till such time the possession of the petitioner should be protected. Review Petition disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO, J) (R.M. R.M. R.M. SAVANT,J) SAVANT,J) SAVANT,J)