1 Cri.A.4819.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4819 OF 2011 [ Dodha Bhila Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra ] WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5066 OF 2011 [Rohidas Waman Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.A.S.Sawant,Advocate for Applicant. Shri.B.V.Wagh,APP for Respondent. Shri.R.S.Shinde,Advocate holding for Shri.V.B.Patil,Advocate for original complainant(Applicant in Cri.A.6066/11). .... CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 22TH NOVEMBER,2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Present applicant apprehends arrest in Crime No. 103 of 2011, registered with Sindhkheda Police Station, District Dhule, under sections 144, 147, 148, 149, 324, 326, 379, 504, 323 and 506 of of the Indian Penal Code. The incident is dated 25th August, 2011. The First Information 2 Cri.A.4819.11 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders report is filed by Mr. Ananda Pawar. According to FIR, as many as eight persons including present applicant armed with sticks, iron bar entered the place of offence and assaulted Jitendra and as a result various injuries were sustained by Jintendra. Police statements indicate eye witness account and as many as six persons have stated that the present applicant was holding iron bar and has assaulted Jitendra. The medical Certificate produced on record, it shows CLW on parietal area, laceration near right ear and abrasion to right side face Right ear traumatic perforation was found. The medical Certificate is inconsonance with history of assault. According to the applicant, few days prior to the alleged incident, the persons belonging to the company of Jintendra-victim had assaulted the 3 Cri.A.4819.11 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders applicant. The record indicates that the present applicant has played major role in the incident by holding iron bar, which is deadly weapon, as such custodial interrogation of the present applicant is required, hence the application for anticipatory bail deserves to be rejected. Hence, the following order: . Application for Anticipatory bail stands rejected. . The Criminal Application No.5066 of 2011 filed by the applicant-original complainant seeking permission to assist learned APP, is granted. Sd/- [ R.Y.GANOO, J.] MTK 4 Cri.A.4819.11 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders