IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7639 of 2010 ASHUTOSH KUMAR SINGH S/O ANIRUDH SINGH R/O VILLAGE-UMAPUR PO- UMAPAUR,PS- BHAGWANPUR DISTT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA)--------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECY. DEPTT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE SECY. DEPTT. OF PRIMARY & ADULT EDUCATION, Bihar, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, KAIMUR 7. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER,KAIMUR, BHABHUA 8. THE B.D.O BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR, BHABHUA 9. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER,BHAGWANPUR,KAUMUR 10. THE HEADMASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL, UMARPUR, BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR 11. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, SARAIYA, BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR 12. THE PANCHAYAT SECY. GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, SARAIYA, BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR------------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The question of law basically with regard to violation of the rules of natural justice to some extent does merit consideration but not at the level of the High Court at this stage. Petitioner has remedy under law either to move the appellate authority or even the District Superintendent of Education who has enclosed the list of names contained in annexure-5 series who were found to be below 18 years of age who came to be employed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. This writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to choose the forum which he would like to. Let a decision be taken irrespective of the order contained in annexure-5 on its own merit. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)