IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18500 of 2009 SURENDRA DAS . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 06.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board. The petitioner School is stated to have been established with the permission of the State Government in 1987 as a non-aided private school. Its students have been appearing in accordance with the norms after being tagged with a government recognised aided school. The present controversy relates to issuance and acceptance of the fees and forms for the ensuing Secondary examination to be held in March 2010 with regard to 120 students of the school. Learned Counsel for the Board very fairly acknowledges that the Board is required in law to adequately consider the inspection report dated 29.6.2009 at Annexure 8 and act in accordance with law forthwith with regard to the genuine students of the institution so that their academic career is not jeopardized. Let the respondent Board act expeditiously in the light of Annexure 8 with regard to the genuine students of the institution within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order before it. If the respondent Board proposes to deny issuance and acceptance of fees and forms for the students of the petitioner institution it shall be required to furnish reason to the petitioner institution within the aforesaid period, grant it opportunity to meet the same and then pass a reasoned and speaking order to facilitate judicial review should the need arise for the same. The writ application is disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)