IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 564 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.07.2010 Mohinder Kumar .......... Petitioner Versus Ashwani Kumar & others ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 6. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to challenge the order dated 21.1.2010, passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Hisar, vide which the application moved by the petitioner to recall the witnesses, who were examined and discharged on the ground that some other material questions were not asked. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the material questions could not be asked due to inadvertence of the counsel for the petitioner, whereas, the questions were material for decision of the case, therefore, the application moved by the petitioner should have been allowed. This plea can not be accepted, in view of the law laid down by this Court in C.R. No. 3665 of 2010 titled Hans Raj Vs. Sanjeev Nehra, decided on 19.7.2010. No merit. Dismissed. 22.07.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE