r BILAs‘PUR y z( &4 g;g. °No.’‘§0 [2 -bra erma s/o charm-u R Iill v am x-ma aged about 2 years , Ve; 4 , ' R khd /o vikrampur P S. chhuiaan; stmct ‘RaJnandgaon (c.G. m ) PP LI A -PPLI A t. Kantvi‘ Bai w/o I-bri Verma, aed about 2‘2‘ye‘ar‘s. g ” ’Sn £s k P at¢mdhb R/o virrampur ui n istric . chhkh da, Dt Qénandgagn('~c.G rve R/o villag’é 1 g h nistri nw ct NON'APPLICAN PPLICAN ? cR Mimi. pRocwURE 1973 A CN T NON A CNT sm la“ R. ‘ A; E§sigiu 3mg _ ‘ T AT a . ,- m WCWQWMLWp/O%i 200 mm (Wu) mmm mw fg‘z‘rm avaifawm ‘ 3B : Hrm’hie Shri Maii'iiiEra Mbhan Shrivastava, J. 21 -09-201D Sm RNJha, cnumei for 1‘he appiicani. None fm“ xhe non-appiican‘i though server}. By this reyision, appiica has a$$aiie§ correctnes$ anu‘ vaiidity‘ (if order daie§ 13l69i’G4 passed by the 'Se ’skms Juu‘ge by which ihe order dated 3i 5/?14 pa$sed by ihe Magistraie in'Cr'im ruai Ca$e Na.38i62 has been rammed am non- ap‘piicant‘s appricaiion fur gram o maintenance has been aiiowedr Learned cuunsei far the ppiicahi argues iharihe reamed Ceur‘i beiow whhe reversrng weii considereti rmriihgs cf the Magietrate has; ignereé to take inie consideration materiai pa of the evidence of applicant’s witneés No.1 Narot‘rarn, appiicant‘s witn%s .2 — Kanii‘iBai and appircant’s witness No.3 Kaushai whoses‘é‘remems in t e cross examinaiion do not iead io prove the marriage befween the appiioani and one i-ao‘ '-Seraswati Ber. Learned eeuneer for the appiicant further argues that the Magistrate after marahatting evidenoe. and raking into consicieration i eniire evidence on record, recordeo'u ihe finding that rhe marriage is noi prov nor ii is proveo' that rhe apphcani has kepi anoiher worn-an hut the Revi onai Couri has reverseo‘ ihe finding W‘i‘rhout anaiyeing and considering ihe er tire evioence on reeord and therefore the finding recorded by the iearned Court h iow are perveree. ih perusai of the order esed by the iviagisirate wouid ehow that the iv'iagietrate considere the teeii non‘y‘ of the appiicani‘s witnees riot-Naroharn who has depoeed in hie croea xarnination that he never went to the house of i-ioriiai nor he is in a position to tate, whethei Saraswati Bai resides with Horiiai or not. i-ie has not given any specific date of soiemnization of marriage nor oi‘airne to be a witnas. The ivi gistrate therefore disbeiieveo‘ his testimony. in so far as testimony oi appiioan s Witnees No.2—Kanti 6ai is concerned, she has n‘ 0 n e a mmm -2.- 'a; am 31m “.cu sried as i0 'v'xmen anti where the marriage was solemnizeti hetween Honiar anu aaraswaii Bar, as alieged by her. The appiicani’s whness No.3-Kaushai has eiated that he was infon‘neri by cne Chamru ihai Horiial married SaraSwa‘ii Bai. However, Chamru hae no? been examined. After taking inte censide ration ihe aforesaid evidence appearing on ~ racord; Vie « rpriove ifiécfaci‘of marn‘age “ Revisiaiia‘i C ui‘fhas more (Jr ‘Saraswaii and is mare in ihe na rnan‘iage has been stated nor ai y of those witnesses have staied the piece of soiemnization of marriage. The is no other wiiness of marriage examined by the non-appiioani to support h r case that her husban contacted another ITIafriage . The hnding of the Revis i Court therefore suffers from gross iiiegaiity ‘ ‘ . Ean‘dca’iih’oi be smhined. As i non-appiioant has faiied to prove that there is ‘ sufficier" can lid that she isj'u iified in iiving separateiy from her husband, ihe - appiicaiion f0: grant of maintenar .: r- c5 Magieirate came i0 the oonciueion ihai non-appiicani faiieci to tween Horiiai and Saraewaii Bai. Learned omechanioaiiy recorded and reproduced the version of Naroiiam (AWI), Kani Bai (AWZ) and Kaushai (AW3) as stared by tL-: nerr exarninai r in chief wiiho 'i considering the iotaiiry of ihe evidence on record. The iesiimon'y‘ of Na am, Kanii Eai and Kauehai in iheir cross examination iaiied io prove t fan-turn of marriage herween Hon’iai and e of conjeciure. Neifher any soecifio daie oi e is iiabie to be rejected. , Accordingiy, this revision is ailowed. The impugned order dated 1n,“ maintenance under Section 125 d a1u9/2GG4 is set aside resuitng in dismissai of rtort-appiican::S ciaim of f.r'.C.‘ i Sdl- 1 Manindra Mohan Shrivastava i 1 Judge a i b f: i a s i r r h r r d