awetEBEiG ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. W.P . N0^^°/2005 PETITIONERS %^ -^"l^ ^^y ""^y <* ^r'* AF^ ^7/ ^s/ y^w^9 ..^ 1. Budhram S/o Itwari Ram Satnami aged about 50 years R/o Village Budgahan Post-Bhatbera P.S. Suhela, Tah. Simga Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Punni Das S/o Mohan Das aged about 51 years, R/o Village Budgahan Post-Bhatbera P.S. Suhela, Tah. Simga Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resources DKS Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2) Chief Engineer Mahanadi, Godawari, Pariyojana Shankar Nagar , Raipur (C.G.) 3) Sub Divisional Officer Water Resources Division No. 2 Civil Line, Behind Radio Station, Raipur (C.G.) 4) Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Raipur, Civil Line Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. FOR ISSUNCE OF WRITS IN THB NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBITION CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION (Sl QR ORDER (S) ^^f ^rVPl w^ V.W^s^^^ ^%^^ .to^* Gl>E>ly -HC—78 3?7^¥T'cFT'f^jNr ^TS?T ^IT^T sFRW HTf T 4A ^11<fl( «»*il<^> '3^ •^it^icn^, ^-al^<i<o, fc«'<i'y^< ...^.f.^£s7)./..or:.WI, 200 ^n^T'^sF (i?^^) ^yTW1H?t?T^1T SB: 1-lon. Mr. Justlce Rritiriker Diwaker 15.07.2009: Shri Ashok Patil counse! for| Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for t^e |the petitioners. respondents/State. CounseE for the petltioner^ petitlon with Siberty to make a repr^ respondents for deciding the repre^entation To this, State counsei has no obje^tion. Accordingly, the petition is afores.aid. if the petitioner makes a months from the date of receipt| concerned shatl decide the sam^ from the of Ets recelpt. !t is made ciear that no expressed by thls Court and the decide the representation of the p^t 'oFT^ra^T *(l^<rfl ^f'fe^ <raj^l< ^3tfiW3iT^[ submits that he wants withdraw thls isentation. He seeks a dlrection to of the petltionsr expedltiousjy. Idismlssed as withdrawn with iiberiy as Irepresentation wifchin a period of two of copy of this order, the authorities within a further period of two months otinion ^jnion on merits of the case has been buthorities concerned wouid be free to ^tltjoner s.trictiy in accordance wlth !aw. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge 1.