IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 16601 of 2008. Decided on: 26.11.2010. _________________________________________________________ Sher Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It is not in dispute that the petitioner had worked for the month of August, 2002, but he has not been paid the salary for this month. Salary is a property within the meaning of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. Since the petitioner has worked for the month of August, 2002, he was required to be paid the salary for this month. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to release and pay the salary to the petitioner for the month of August, 2002. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 26, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.