IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.22135 of 2010 LALLAN SAH son of Late Shobha Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 392, 279, 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case is that the BOLERO car of the informant was looted by unknown persons and thereafter it was dashed against a truck. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. Later on, certain witnesses stated that the petitioner was seen in an injured condition in the same area and, therefore, he was suspected to have been involved in the present case. It is clearly asserted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rahul Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Kaimur, Bhabua, in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No.225 of 2002 (Tr. No.856 of 2010), subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released - 2 - on bail, (iii)That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)