IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2010 / 16TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37816 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- AJAI RAJ, S/O. T.V.THANKARAJ, AGED 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.206, TRAVANCORE TOWERS, KATHRIKADAVU, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 017. BY ADV. SRI.SAIJU. S. RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI - 22, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI - 22, ERNAKULAM DISTICT. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1,2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.37816 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner herein underwent B.Tech Degree Course in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the respondent-Cochin University. He failed in one subject, VLSI Design (EC703) in the Seventh Semester. Petitioner appeared for the subsequent semester examination held along with regular candidates in November, 2009. Alleging that there is inordinate delay in publishing results he has filed this writ petition. The urgency sought by the petitioner is that he has secured an admission to the Radio Electronic Cum Electro Technical Officer's Course (REETO) in Seacom Marine College, Kolkata. It is his plea that the classes for the said course are to commence by the first week of February, 2010 and unless the result is published he will not get admission. 2. The learned standing counsel for the respondents submitted that since the valuation of the papers have started only on 28/12/2009, there are various procedures before publication of the result and at any rate the result will published by March, 2010. W.P.(C)No.37816 of 2009 2 3. The same is recorded. If there is any procedure prescribed by the University to inform the marks of the results of the examination under taken by the petitioner to the institution wherein he has secured admission, before the actual publication of results, then the same will also be considered by the respondents. The petitioner will have to bear the expenses, if any involved in it and intimation in that regard will be issued by the University well in time. With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE skj