CWP No.1105 of 2007. 02.04.2008 Present : Mr.Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.Suneet Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ms.Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 6. Mr.Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Mr.K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for respondents No.7 and 8. Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.9. Mr.Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.10, 14 and 18. Mr.Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondents No.11 to 13. Mr.Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondents No.15 to 17. Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.19. Mr.Baldev Singh, Advocate, for Central Mines Planning and Design Institute Limited. CWP No.1105 of 2007 and CMPs No.3370 of 2007, 381 of 2008 and 567 of 2008. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned Advocate General prays for the modification of the order dated 28th September, 2007. Basically no one has any objection to it. The Central Mines Planning and Design Institute has shown its inability to do the needful. Accordingly, we find that since the State Department of Environment and Scientific Technology prior to this order had undertaken the task of preparation of Environment Master Plan for the CWP No.1105 of 2007. (2) State of Himachal Pradesh which has been completed in the month of December, 2007 with the financial assistance of the World Bank in the Department of International Development of United Kingdom (DFID) and the detailed proposal has already been submitted to the State Government for further necessary action and a comprehensive status report has already been prepared, in such circumstances, the order dated 28th September, 2007 is modified to the extent as referred hereinabove. We further find that the interest of justice will suffice if all directions contained in order dated 28th September, 2007 with the above modifications be complied with expeditiously. The petition is disposed of. Interim order stands automatically discharged. (Jagdish Bhalla),C.J. April 2, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. (aks)