IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 1009 of 2009() ----------------------------- OPOS.1050/2006 of FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA .................... APPELLANTS: RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------- 1. REGHUKUMAR,AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAPILLAI,AMBAKKAD VADAKKETHIL, ERUVA MURI,PATHIYOOR VILLAGE. 2. RUKMINI AMMA,AGED 71 YEARS, W/O.KRISHNAPILLAI,AMBAKKAD VADAKKETHIL, ERUVA MURI,PATHIYOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT: PETITIONER ------------------------- KRISHNAKUMARI, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.BHARATHI AMMA,PUTHENPURAYIL VEETTIL, VETTUMENI MURIYIL,PALLIPPAD VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. ADV. SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN FOR R1 SRI.G KRISHNAKUMARI [CAVEATOR] THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.M. Appln. No. 3798 of 2009 & Mat.A. No. 1009 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The above application to condone the delay was allowed on certain terms, apparently taking note of the compromise, which was purported to be entered between the parties. It is not in dispute that the appellant has not complied with the terms of the compromise, despite opportunity being given. In such circumstances, in terms of the order passed by this Court, the application to condone the delay will stand dismissed. Consequently the appeal will also stand dismissed. (K.M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm