THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5259 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner/defendant No.1 filed this Civil Revision Petition assailing the order dated 30.09.2008 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada in I.A.No.217 of 2008 in O.S.No.15 of 2003, whereby the Interlocutory Application filed by the plaintiffs to send the document for impounding before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuzvid, was allowed overruling the objection raised by the petitioner that the said document cannot be received in evidence unless it is registered. Respondents Nos.1 and 2 herein filed the above suit for declaration of title in respect of Acs.3.07 cents of land in R.S.Nos.80/2 and 79/1, Saipuram stating that the said land was given to the second plaintiff by the first defendant towards “pasupu kumkuma” at the time of her marriage, which took place in the year 1968 by delivering possession to them and since then they are in possession and enjoyment of the same. Pending the suit, the plaintiffs filed the above Interlocutory Application to receive the document executed in favour of the second plaintiff on 28.03.1992 for impounding the same to prove their case. The petitioner herein filed a counter raising an objection for receiving the said document denying about giving of the said land to the second plaintiff towards “pasupu kumkuma” and stating that since the recitals of the suit document show that possession was delivered under it, unless the said document is registered as a gift deed, the same cannot be admissible in evidence. The Court below, considering the entire material available on record, by the impugned order allowed the Interlocutory Application overruling the objection raised by the petitioner with regard to the admissibility of the document and transmitting the same to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuzivid for impounding, as per rules. Since possession is claimed by the respondents/plaintiffs under the said document since 1968, whether the said document can be received for collateral purpose to prove possession or not can be considered, after impounding the document only. In view of the same, I see no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 21.04.2011 va