IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1259 of 2007 SABITRI DEVI & ORS Versus KAMLESHWARI YADAV & ORS ----------- 3 20/10/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners both on the issue of limitation as also on merits. For the reasons mentioned in the connected I.A. no. 3604 of 2007, the delay in filing of this Civil Revision Application is condoned. On merits, however in the opinion of this Court the impugned order refusing to review the order dated 1.11.2006, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error, in as much as, the court had earlier considered the said grievance of the petitioner and had rejected prayer of the petitioner for exhibiting certain documents by the aforementioned reasoned order dated 1.11.2006 (Annexure-2). Unfortunately, the petitioner had again made the same prayer in the application dated 22.12.2006 and what is really shocking is that he did not choose to even mention about the earlier order dated 1.11.2006 and in the garb of getting a 2 fresh order on the same concluded issue had really asked for review of the earlier order dated 1.11.2006. That being so, this Court would find that there was no ground in terms of order 47 C.P.C. to review the order dated 1.11.2006 and the Court below had rightly rejected the said prayer of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, this application is wholly misconceived and is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar