IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.212 of 2008 RADHA DEVI ..PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ANITA DEVI … OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioner : Mr. Kartik Kumar Sinha & : Mrs. Mala Sinha For O. P. NO.2 :Mr.Najmul Homa & : Mr. Binay Kr. Binit For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyaya,APP ----------- 3. 16-09-2010 Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of acquittal recorded by the learned trial court, FTC II, Jamui in Sessions Case No. 424 of 2005 (Trial Case No. 72 of 2007). Allegation against the accused was that she killed a minor son of her sister- in-law by drowning him into a well. The FIR seems to have been lodged after 20 days of the occurrence. Learned trial court found that the sister-in-law (Nanad), brother-in-law (Nandosi) and other witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. The background of the case has also been noticed by learned trial court. There is no post-mortem report on record. Having regard to all these aspects emanating from records, it has been found that prosecution case is shrouded with serious doubts. It was thus not found prudent to convict the accused (O.P. No. 2 herein) on the strength of materials on record and, as such, the judgment and order of acquittal was recorded. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate any patent illegality and/or impropriety in the judgment meriting interference. 2 There is no merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )