THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO. 18240 of 2007 DATE: 28-08-2007 Between : Sara Ramulu … Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak District and 2 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO. 18240 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the authorized dealer of the fair price shop of Yelkurthy village, Temkal Mandal. His authorization was cancelled by the first respondent by order dated 14-05-2005 challenging which the petitioner preferred an appeal before the second respondent. The said appeal was dismissed by order dated 01-08-2005 and the same was also confirmed on revision by the third respondent by order dated 28-07-2007. Hence, this writ petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. A perusal of the impugned order dated 28-07-2007 shows that the third respondent while dismissing the revision petition, except referring to the contentions in the revision petition, did not record any finding much less assigned reasons in support of the conclusion that the matter did not warrant interference. The law is well settled that absence of reasons is one of the grounds to exercise the power of judicial review, since the failure of the Quasi Judicial Authority to assign reasons would result in violation of the principles of natural justice. Therefore, on that ground alone the impugned order is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the impugned order is hereby set aside and the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider the revision petition afresh and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law following due process of law. No costs. _______________ G. ROHINI, J. Date:28-08-2007 KLP