kf \by' •h' HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH: BIIASPUR Writ Pfctition fS) No. 7273 of2007 Petitioner Pramod KumarTBpari Versus Respoadents State ofChIiatisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Articte 226 ofthe Ganstitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Ravish Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawyer fer fhe respoudeiits No. 1 to 4. Shri Rahul Birthrey, Advocate for the respondeirt No.3. ORDBRtotall ( Passed on this 18th day ofpebroaiy, 2010) Heard. The petitioaer has fited this writ petition cIiaUengmg the teaasfer order dated 25.10.2007 (Annexune P/l). Acoordmg to learaed couasel appearing for fhe petitioner, by wirtue of fhe intBrim order datcd 10.12.2007, passed by fliis Court, fhe petltioner is contmuing at the original place ofposting. Be that as it may, witfa the pass^e af tiae, this writ petition has become iitfructuous, as the period of transfer is not appUcable forever. At thte poiat oftime, it K not necessaiy to examiae the legaBty aad validity of fhe transfer arder, as fhe iiapiigned order could not be given efifect to on account oftbc taterim stay oider dated 10. 12.2007, passcd ly this Court. However, fhe respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate oiders, Issepmg in view fhe public interest and admnusttative exigency, af so advised, wlthout insisting on coinpliance of the impiigned transfer order. In view of the above, this writ pctitiDn slands disposed of. No order asto costs. ' Sd/- SatisbK.Agnihom Judge •Ibalcur