IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 771 OF 2000 SUIT NO. 771 OF 2000 SUIT NO. 771 OF 2000 Rohini Damji Sidpra ... Plaintiff Vs. ata Share Registry Ltd. & Ors. Defendants Ms. Rohini Sidpra plaintiff in person. Mr. Sandip Bhimkar i/b. Wadia Gandhy & Co. for Defendant No.4. Mr. K.H. Mody a/w i/b. h.P.Narsana i/b. Harshad & Co. for Defendant No.5. Mr. Ss.D.Raje for defendant No.1. Ms. Mamta Singh i/b. H.P. Bhardwaj for defendant No.2 Hansa Adwani a/w Sagheer Khan for Defendant no.6. CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. DATE DATE DATE : 22nd December,2005. 22nd December,2005. 22nd December,2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is the suit asking for direction to defendants Nos. 1 and 2 to give information. Defendant No.1 is the Tata Share Registry Ltd. The plaintiff submits that she has got all the information from the defendant No.1. 2. So far as defendant No.2 is concerned, the learned Counsel for the defendant No.2 submits that the Bank has already written to the plaintiff calling upon her to approach the Bank for getting whatever information she wants. 3. So far as defendant no.3 is concerned, the defendant No.3 has expired. 4. So far as defendant No.4 is concerned, the learned counsel for the defendant NO.4states that the plaintiff is asking for the details of the three accounts which are the accounts of the family members of the plaintiff and states that the plaintiff is not entitled to any details of those accounts. 5. So far as the defendant No.5 is concerned, the learned Counsel representing defendant no.5 states that the defendant No.5 has filed an affidavit giving all the required information. 6. So far as the defendant No.6 is concerned, he is the brother of the plaintiff and no claim is made against the defendant No.6. 7. Prayer clause (c) of the plaint is claiming decree of Rs.1 million as interim damages. No details of the claim has been mentioned in the plaint. 8. Under the circumstances, the suit does not survive. The suit is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 9. Consedquently, the Notice of Motion No. 626 of 2005 in the suit stands disposed of. 10. All applications in this suit stands disposed of. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)