..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.106 OF 2009 Shri.Kishor Vitthal Wakte. ..Applicant. -Versus- State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.H.C.Halli, Advocate i/b. Mr.Subhash Hulyalkar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.P.A.Pol, A.P.P, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2009. [IN CHAMBER, 2:40 PM] P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R. No.41 of 2007 of Bhosari Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 302, 364 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The applicant had earlier preferred an application for bail which came to be rejected by me by order dated 11th September, 2008. Except for the fact that the applicant has been in custody since 6.3.2007, no other fresh ground has been brought to my notice to necessitate the reconsideration of the earlier order. ..(2).. 4. Looking to the role played by the applicant, just because the applicant has been in custody from 6.3.2007, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Application is rejected. Liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail, if the trial does not commence by 15th June, 2009. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)