1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7539/2008 (Madhu Ramdev Vs. Union Bank of India & Ors.) Date of order :: 23.9.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.B.P. Bohra, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. For the outstanding against petitioner, a compromise was arrived at between the Bank and petitioner, whereby rupees 23 lacs were to be paid by petitioner. Upon perusal of the order passed by Recovery Officer, it clearly appears that copy of compromise was not supplied to petitioner. It is also ordered that Bank authority shall remain present before the tribunal on 15th September, 2008 and petitioner has been granted time for depositing the said amount till 29th September, 2008. 2 There is nothing wrong in the order passed by Recovery Officer. Moreover, if petitioner is challenging any condition of the agreement, then he is free to file an application before the Bank. Upon filing any application for disagreement with the conditions of agreement, the Bank authorities are free to recover whole of the amount from petitioner. With these observations, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/- A.K. Chouhan/-