IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 12641 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Sanjeev Dharmani & Ors. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Pushpender Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Nek Ram and Others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, CWP(T) No. 14232 of 2008, decided on 17th November, 2009. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioners in view of the principles laid down by this Court in the judgment dated 17th November, 2009, as noticed above, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No.