IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P. NO.34161 of 2006 1.P. Murugan 2.M. Abirami 3.T. Vasudevan 4.T.G.Krishnamoorthy 5.M. Nambeeswari 6.M.Subbammal 7.P. Murugesan 8.T.Thukkan 9.S.Rajendran 10.S.Mohan .. Petitioners Vs. Police Radio Officer, Chennai - 4 .. Respondent PRAYER : Original Application No.9570 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, direct the respondent to regularise the services of the petitioner on permanent basis and to fix regular Time Scale of Pay retrospectively with effect from their original date of Appointment and consequently direct the respondent to grant all service benefits including pensionary benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For Petitioners : Mr.S.M.Subramaniam For Respondent : Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, Government Advocate. O R D E R Original Application No.9570 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, direct the respondent to regularise the services of the Applicant on permanent basis and to fix regular Time Scale of Pay retrospectively with effect from their original date of Appointment and consequently direct the respondent to grant all service benefits including pensionary benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Petitioners were originally appointed as part-time Menial in the respondent department on various dates in the years 1972, 1980, 1983, 1984, 1988, 1990. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that they are working in the respondent department for more than 20 years and therefore, their services should be regularised. 3.Reply affidavit has been filed by the respondent Department stating that the appointment could not be regularised, because, they are not sponsored through the employment exchange. Further they were temporarily appointed. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the original appointment order itself shows that they are sponsered by the employment exchange. In such view of the matter, the Police Radio Officer respondent is directed to consider the claim for regularisation on merits. The petitioners are permitted to make a detailed representation to the said authority along with a copy of this order and such representation shall be considered by the authority and dispose of the same on merits within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation. 4.The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. vsm To Police Radio Officer,Chennai - 4 + 1 cc to Mr.S.M.Subramaniam, Advocate Sr 7084 + 1 cc to Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, Govt., Advocate Sr 7391 W.P. NO.34161 of 2006 TRM (CO) RH (8.4.10) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/