IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 3548 of 2007 Date of decision : December 08, 2010 Ekam Kaur alias Ekma Kaur ....Appellant versus Rajinder Singh ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for the respondent Appellant and respondent's son Jagpal Singh also in person L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) With the intervention of the Court, parties have effected amicable settlement. Joint statement regarding compromise has been recorded separately and is reproduced herein:- “Stated that parties have effected amicable settlement. Respondent's son Jagpal Singh is also present in person and has instructed the counsel for respondent on behalf of the respondent. According to settlement, respondent shall within one month from today pay to the appellant Rs 70,000/- in lumpsum in full and final satisfaction of the claim of the appellant. However, if the amount is not so paid within the stipulated period, the suit of the appellant-plaintiff no.2 shall be deemed to have been decreed for recovery of Rs 1,38,000/- being maintenance amount from 17.1.2000 the date of filing of the suit till 16.9.2007, the date of marriage of plaintiff no. 2- -2- appellant @ Rs 1500/- per month alongwith interest thereon @ 6% per annum since 17.1.2000 the date of filing of the suit till recovery. The appeal be disposed of accordingly.” The appeal has, thus, been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the above statement which shall also form the part of the decree sheet. ( L.N. Mittal ) December 08, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'