IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7369 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- KAILASHBEN BECHARSINGH VEGHELA Versus HARSHADSINGH MANUSINGH CHHAVDA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 7369 of 1999 MS NEENA R AGRAWAL for Petitioner No. 1 MS BANNA S DUTTA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 17/12/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT This matter was listed on 9.12.2002 but none was present on behalf of petitioner. Today also when the matter is called out the petitioner nor the advocate for the petitioner-Ms.Neena Agrawal is present. 2. The learned counsel for respondent Ms.Banna Dutta has filed a note stating that the parties have compromised the matter and therefore the petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the note filed by the learned counsel for the respondent the petition is disposed of having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. 17.12.2002 (JAYANT PATEL,J)