IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 860 of 2011 Date of Decision: April 28, 2011 Liyakat Ali ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. R.P. Daaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raja Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, for the release of detenues as mentioned in Para No.5 of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No.3 to 5. Reply filed on behalf of State of Haryana is on the file and is to the effect that all the alleged detenues have left the brick kiln on 12.04.2011. On the last date of hearing learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that all the alleged detenues have shifted from the brick kiln of respondent No.3 to some farm house situated in Jind. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the reply filed by respondent-State, the present petition has become infructuous In view of the abovesaid reply and statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further action is required to be taken at this stage. Hence, the instant petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. April 28, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE