IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 966 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision 10.8.2011 Balwinder Kaur . Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others .. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the appellant 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. The appellant has remained unsuccessful in persuading the learned Single Judge to quash the selection process and appointment letters issued to persons who were ineligible for the post of Physical Training Instructor (PTI). It is appropriate to mention that applications for the post of PTI were invited in October, 2006. The appellant claimed to be eligible on the ground that she had qualified C.P.Ed qualification prior to 1997. However, the learned Single Judge found that according to the advertisement she was required to be Sr. Secondary School Certificate or Intermediate or its equivalent. However, she was matriculate alone. Accordingly a categorical finding has been recorded that without qualification of Sr. Secondary School Certificate or Intermediate or its equivalent, the petitioner could not be considered eligible to compete for the post of PTI. 2. We have heard learned counsel at some length and are of the view that the findings recorded by the learned Single Judge are well based and do not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference of this Court. The appeal does not merit admission and is accordingly dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (Gurdev Singh) 10.8.2011 Judge okg