HISH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH: Bil-ASPUR Writ Petition (Si No. of 2001 Raiesh Kumar Sinha. S/o. Late K.R. Sinna, acsd sbOLi 42 vssrs. worklna ss Asstt. Grgds ! T.i -i-^^^.^ ^ i-M-^,.^^^-; "1:1-,^ r^;j^-7.^^;-( :>i] i eiUtei;—L/Eicii UU; id; L/itell. L^Ui^^iJ/. Respondents 1) Stats of Chhattisgarn, through its Secretsr/, Rajasva Evam Aapda Vibhag; D.K.S. Bha'.van, O.-,:n.; <f f''^-,''"*^' ro^pur ^^)- 2) Coilecior, D.stt. Durg+CG). 3) Pllaram Sahu, workingr as Asstt. Gracfe !N, Tahsii - Gurur, Distt. DWQ SCQ'i. (Writ Petltion under Articie 226 of the ConstituSion of india^ SS: Hon'bte Mr. Satjsh K. Aanihots'i, d. Sh" P.S. Koshv. counse! fer the petiticner. Shri Arun Sao, Gcivfc. Advocate fer ths Stste. (Passed on 11" dayofJuly, 2008) With consent of iearned counsei SDpearing for both the Darties, t;''ie matter is heard finaliv. i'aiU 2) Learned counsel appearing fbr the peHtioner subrrsits that the petitioner does not want to press thls petition on merits, at this stage. However, the ceiitioner may oe permittec! to make a representaBon isetore ine concemea authonties witnin a perlod of three days and tne same may oe dlrected to be cfecicied, In accordance with 'aw, within the prescriDed tlme. 3) Shri Arun Sao, tearned Govt. Advocate appearing fcr the State submits Shat ifths representation is made, the same shaii be consldered and decaed by tns concsrned authonty, in acsoroance ivitn iaw, on its own ments, witnin a oeriod of two wesks from the date of rsceipt oS ths representation. 4) In wew OF the foregolng, ncrthing survives in the matter. Mr. Sao further submrts that no ooercive steps shail be taken against tne pett.oner, Tii; ths disposal of the representation. 5) Accordingiy, the pet.tion is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- --bT.r ibotn