4 IN Ti-IL iiTI 1 tL COURT 0 F 4NATAKA AT B ANGALORE DATED TiLlS IIiE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE iION’13LE iL. JUICE H.L. iAT’iU WRIT gJrION 25884/1997 BETWEEN Subhash Chan1ra B., major, Hotel National Cafe, Opp. to Basaves— wara Temple, Basavana llagew aLIt, Bijapur — 586 101. ... PETlTIflNTR (Dy M/’s. Sundarswamy, Ramdas, Advs.) ND I. Karnataka State Itoad Transport Corporation rep, by itsManaing Director, Central Oltice, K.H. Ead, Bangalore 27, 2, Divisional Controller Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bijapur Division 1 Bijapur — 586 101. 3, Harish Poojari major, blanalore Hotel, K.C, Market, Bijapur — 586 101. 4. Sham 2 oojari aged about 35 years, Hotel Maduvana Internat ional, Station road, Bijaour — 5b 101. ... RESi-i- N::; (By Sri .V. Jayaprakash, Adv., for H—I & 2, R—3 & 4 sd.) V. • a 4, a2a this writ petition filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct the KSRTC to retender by giving adequate notice as reauired under the Standing order etc.., 1hi petition coming on for orders, this day the court mad. the following: The matter is list.d in the order ‘a list. By consent of learned counsel for the parties to the lie, it is taken up for final hearing. 2. Petitioner in this petition is seeking for a direction to the let respondent Corporation to re-tender by giving adequate notice as required under the Standing Orders of the respondent Corporation. 3. This court while entertaining this petition, had granted an interim prayer in favour of the petitioner. 4. Now, the reepondentel and 2 have filed an application before this court for vacating that interim order granted by this court. In that application, respondents have stated that the respondent Corporation pursuant to the notification issued calling for tenders • had accepted the tender of the 4th respondent and thereafter has even permitted respondents to run Refreshment Room at KSRTC bus stand, Bijapur, It is also stated in the apIa that the respondent has already commenced business. In that view of the matter, issues raised in this petition would not survive for consideration. 5. Accordingly, petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly. CSG sal 7 7.,’