^^- ^z/0^- s ILE IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(SINO. - ^^A\ /2010 PETITIONER c Shanta Ram Yadav, S/o Late Ramdev Yadav, Aged about 52 years, R/o Village - Barrepatti, Post Naupadeva, Tahsil & Distt. Jaunpur (U.P.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^o.,..(g..2. ..-A >:°'Ay ^' ^G.v.:&y" ^..••^v ^•••;^"c>'1" ^'^ "^•/" 3. Union of India, Through - Secretary, Security ,Department of Railways, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi Secretary, Security Department of Railways , Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. The Chief Security, Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur-(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI BTC. OR ANY QTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^ ~S~^ ^iWM^, ©Tl1-(Hjl<o, i®tcr1H>4,< \^t(^)r^^^\/t&\Q <W-R1T ^p-ft^ •WS; 200 ^T^?i XI^T (^I^^) ^I^T^T^W ^m^n^T^qN? y Tumane I^TW^ft^^I^l SB: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Sl 09-07-2010 Shri Sunil Otwani, counsel for th^ petitioner. Ms. Noushina Afrin Ali, Standing on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel for the petition^r submits that earlier petition was withdrawn on 07-01-2010 with liberty to| '^FTf^FN 'HR^ff^ 1^t '(f^l^R '^3?fiP:T3^T hrivastava.J. counsel for respondents/Raihways prefer revision under provisions of Rule 219 ofthe Railway Protection Forfre Rules, 1987. tt is submitted that thereafter. a revision has been prefe|red before the nespondent No.2- Secretary, Security, Department of Rail|ways on 01-02-2010, but the same has remained pending. Leamed Standing counsel for |he respondents/Railways submits that the revision ought to be preferrejd before the competent authority namely Member Staff of Railway Boardl New Delhi. In view of the aforesaid subn|ission, tet the revision preferred before the respondent No.2 be placed l|)efore the Member Staff of Railway Board, New Delhi along with releva^it records. Revision filed by the petitioner shall be decided by the Mei|nber Staff of Railway Board, New Delhi, in accordarKse with law, within a|reasonable period keeping in view the provisions contained in Rule 220| of tte Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, which prescribes the norr^ial period ofthree months from the date of receipt of appeal/revision. With the aforesaid direction. the |)etitton is finally disposed of. ^3 Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ?ire^W ^NN-g^IT^T, ^FsRf^^—FS/il47—2/2010—1,00,000.