1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.12 OF 1998 Shah Prabhudas Gulabchand ..Petitioner Vs. The Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.1022 OF 1998 M/s. Associated Investment & Trading Co. ..Petitioner Vs. Wanbury Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.32 OF 1998 Garden Finance Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. The Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.464 OF 1998 2 GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.764 OF 1998 S. P. Capital Financing Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. The Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.1016 OF 1998 Baldeo r. Desai ..Petitioner Vs. Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.33 OF 1999 Esanda Finaz & Leasing Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. The Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents 3 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.328 OF 1999 M/s. Hikal Chemicals Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.1141 OF 1999 M/s. Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. M/s. Pharmaceuticals Products India Ltd. ..Respondents None present for the parties in CP/12/98, CP/464/98, CP/764/98, CP/1016/98, CP/33/99, CP/328/99 and CP/1141/99 None for the Petitioner in CP/1022/97 Mr. Rehman i/b M/s. D. H. Law Associates for Respondent Ms. Swati Bodhanwala i/b FZB Associates for Petitioner in CP/32/98 None for the Respondent CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: 5th November , 2009 P.C. : Counsel appearing on behalf of the Company has placed on record a copy 4 of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 16th May 2008, by which the proceedings were remitted back to the BIFR, so as to enable it to proceed in accordance with the provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, afresh. Counsel for the Respondent states that proceedings are still pending before the BIFR. In that view of the matter, further hearing of the Petition is adjourned sine die with liberty to the parties to move the Court after the proceedings before the BIFR and AAIFR have come to an end. Counsel for the Respondent undertakes to inform the registry, once the proceedings under SICA come to an end and also to inform Advocates for the Petitioners. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)