IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.94 of 2009 MOST.KIRAN DEVI W/O LATE BINOD KUAMR (CONSTABLE) R/O VILLAGE- CHARAUN, P.S.-MUFASSIL (MUNGER), DISTRICT- MUNGER ………… …………………APPELLANTS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE- CUM-RETURNING OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR 5. UNION OF INDIA 6. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY 7. RAILWAY S.P., MUZAFFARPUR ……………………….RESPONDNETS ----------- 2 10/02/2009 Writ petitioner-appellant, aggrieved by the order dated 18.08.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge passed in C.W.J.C. No. 97 of 2006 dismissing the writ application, has preferred this appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent. Mrs. Pravina Kumari appearing on behalf the petitioner submits that the learned Single Judge ought not to have dismissed the writ application without giving notice to the respondents. We are of the opinion that no law mandates that before dismissing a writ application, this Court is obliged to give notice to the respondents. We do not find any merit in this appeal. It is dismissed in limine. (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin