1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5333 OF 2007 (Uttam Jesa Rathod .v. Yuwak Mandal and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 12TH FEBRUARY, 2009. Heard the appellant-in-person and Shri M.R. Pillai, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. By the present appeal, the appellant challenges the order dated 3rd December, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition No. 5333 of 2007 preferred against the judgment and order dated 6th September, 2007 passed by the School Tribunal in Appeal No. 77 of 1995. The Tribunal held that the appellant had not completed the probation period and as such his services could not be said to have been illegally terminated. Consequently, the School Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the appellant. The learned Single Judge of this Court upheld the order of the School Tribunal and observed that the 2 probation period of the petitioner was not extended and as such the petitioner/appellant cannot not claim the status of permanency and consequently dismissed the writ petition. Having heard the appellant-in-person and Shri M.R. Pillai, the learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, we do not find any ground to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. The impugned orders are neither illegal nor perverse. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 54 OF 2009 In view of the dismissal of the appeal, nothing survives in the present application. The same is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.