?^"' x'^^"'';^ // f A III THE HIGH GOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOASPUR(C.G.l ^ . . ^' WRIT REnnOH RO. ^ O1^ //aow pETi'nonER SWAMI NATH YADAV, S/0. RAM KISHUNYADAV, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, WORKING AS SUB- INSPECTOR OP POUCE. DISTRICT DANTEWADA AND PRESENTLY POSTED AT. P.S. KANKER, DISTRICr KANKER (C.G.) VERSUS isesosD&yiTs / -^.M^^ ..•••^'"^ ^y^ ^^ THE STATE OF CHHATHSGARH, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATriSOARH). THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POUCE, POLICE HQ., RAIPUR (CHHATnSGARH) THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POUCE (ADMINISTRATION). POLICE HQ., RAIPUR(CHHATTISGARH). THE SUPERINTENDENT OP POLICE, DISTRICT DANTEWADA, (CHHATHSGARH.) WMT PBTITIOW UBDER ARTICtB 226/227 OF THB coNsnTo'noti IUCTPRE OF mDIA BOR ISSUTAIICE OB- WMT IH 1HE s. cMnnORAiu. waoHiRn'ioiLASBD FOR OTHER tStBaTAKI.B WMT OR WtrTS. ORDKR OR ORDBRS, mRBcnow OR DIRBCTIOIBS. XI-HC-22 sn^^r^T f^ITERSTI^T 3iIiffiHf?tT -\'»^-VJ 3ST "i<l^lfi<4, SrtRFre, l«l<iwy U'P" 1 o (, t1 OS' •^ an^rs^irw ([(??' ^pifcrift^ wwrf if tec^ tftresK ^sri^iTsn^T 24.6.2005 Suit. R'eenia Dubey, coui\ Shri G. K. Beriwal, Depl State. .sel for fhe petitioner. Litv Advocate General for fhe Heard. Learned counsel for t^ie petitioner subiaits that identical orders have been pa^ssed i& several cases where after tianster order no 1-elievin.g order was passed. This Court m W.P.No. 4709/2004 (Krislmta Murari Mishra Vs. State & ofhers') vide order dated 1$. 1.2005 has du-ected the respondents to reUeve the petiti^ner withia 15 da}rs from. fue date offhe production offhe copy ofthe order. In view of tlie foregoing, |lie respondents are directed to coiiiply witli fhe traiisfer c^i'der by issuin.g appropriate order for relieviiig the petitione^ within a period of 15 da-ys froin the date of receipt of copy ^f this oixler. With the above direction, the petition stands disposed offinallv. | __ ___ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge