1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2009 Sunanda Asaram Gaikwad .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Smt. S. E. Madne, (Narvate), Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1 and 2. Shri A. S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3 and 4. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER [Per B. R. Gavai, J. ] : 1. The petitioner challenges the condition No. 3 in Schedule 'B' of the Government Resolution dated 12th March, 2008 which prescribes the condition that, the qualification for the post of Anganwadi Sevika, mini Angawadi Karyakarti in urban areas should be S.S.C. pass and in the rural areas should be VIIIth standard pass. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that, in view of the Government Resolution dated 24th October, 2 1994, a candidate who had more than two years experience, by way of special case is entitled for relaxation from the condition of qualification. The Government Resolution dated 12th March, 2008 is subsequent to the Government Resolution dated 24th October, 1994. In any case as to what should be the qualification for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Sevika is purely a matter of policy decision. Unless the policy is arbitrary or violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India, it is not permissible for this Court to interfere in the policy decision. No arbitrariness is noticed in the policy, so as to invoke the writ jurisdiction. Hence the writ petition is rejected. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/Oct. 09