1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.508 OF 2002 PETITION NO.508 OF 2002 PETITION NO.508 OF 2002 G.D. Mallick ..Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2460 OF 2006 Surinder Singh Oberoi & Ors. .Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1651 OF 2006 T.V. John ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Satendra Kumar for the Petitioners Ms. Sona Singh for respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 1ST DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. . In Writ Petition Nos.1651 of 2006 and 2460 of 2006 Rule. By consent heard forthwith. 2. The issue in these petitions is covered by the Judgment dated 22nd November, 2006 in Writ Petition No.430 of 2005 in the case of Gurumukh Singh & Others vs. Union of India and others. For the view taken in Writ Petition No.430 of 2005 these petitions also will have to be allowed. In the light 2 of that the following order:- (i) We direct the respondents that within sixteen weeks from today, to consider the case of all the petitioners for the purpose of condoning the deficiency in service and to pass appropriate orders according to law. If the deficiency is condoned then to pass appropriate orders as to service pension. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).