IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26458 of 2001 Between: 1 M.Chandra Sekhar Pillai, S/o. Kuppuswamy Pillai, R/o. Vinobha Nagar Village, Krishnapuram Post, Nagalappuram Mandal, Chittoor District. 2 M.Audisekaran, S/o. Krishna Pillai, R/o. Vinobha Nagar Village, Krishnapuram Post, Nagalappuram Mandal, Chittoor District. 3 M.Sugunavathi, W/o. Late M.Rajan, R/o. Vinobha Nagar Village, Krishnapuram Post, Nagalappuram Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue (M) Department, Secretaiat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nagala Puram, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:NONE APPEARED The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein in not assigning the lands an extent of 6 Ac.28 cents to the Petitioners herein in Sy.Nos.1461/7, 1461/9, 1482/2, 1481/6, 1462/5, 1462/9, 1480/8, 1482/3 situated at Nagalapuram Black Tank Area ( Vinobha Nagar ), Nagalapuram Mandal, Chittoor District which are reserved for dispolaced families of Mudiyur Village as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.2826, dated 16-7-1956, G.O.Ms.No.610, Revenue, dated 27-6-1967 and G.O.Ms.No.423, Revenue, dated 15-4-1972 and violative of Board Standing Orders 15 Para 10 (2) and consequently direct the Respondents to dispose of the representations from 1963 onwards and latest one dated 12-12-2001 and assign the lands by taking the Petitioners' long possession and enjoyment.” On 02.03.2009 and also today, there has been no representation for the petitioners. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th MARCH, 2009. kvni