Cr.Rev. No. 963/03 30.11.2011 On 3.11.2011 the following order was passed in this case :- “The State counsel may examine under which law the medical doctor treating the victim was bound to give information to the police about the offence.” On 15.11.11 learned counsel for the State sought an adjournment which was granted, yet today learned counsel for the State counsel is no better of than the previous two dates. He has not been above to show anything. Before framing a charge U/s 176 IPC it would be desirable that the learned Magistrate had applied his mind to the above aspect. He will also consider whether the other charges should be framed against the doctor conducting the medico-legal examination of the victim. In the circumstances it is directed that the matter will be reconsidered by the magistrate after hearing the concerned parties. The revision is allowed as indicated above. (Sushil Harkauli) Acting Chief Justice at/AK