1 cr-apln-2745-10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN. NO. 2745 OF 2010 Peyman Mahmud Khavanin ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Ms. Sherali S.Khan Adv. for applicant Mr. S.A.Shaikh APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard both sides. 2 By order dated 8.3.2010 passed by the Special Judge under NDPS, Pune, the seized vehicle bearing registration No. MH-12- BG-3366 and two mobile handsets came to be returned to the applicant on executing Supurtnama for Rs.5,00,000/- with one surety in the like amount. In addition, the applicant-accused was directed to furnish bank guarantee in the sum of Rs. 1 lakh. Being aggrieved by these two conditions, the applicant has approached this Court. 2 cr-apln-2745-10 3 Even according to the applicant, the value of the vehicle is Rs.2 lakhs. Hence, in such case, I am not inclined to interfere with the direction that he should furnish bank guarantee of Rs.1 lakh. However, as far as Supurtnama for Rs.5 lakhs with one surety of the like amount is concerned, I am inclined to reduce the said amount from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 1 lakh. Thereupon the learned advocate for the applicant submitted that instead of Supurtnama with surety, he will furnish bank guarantee for higher amount. In this view of the matter, the bank guarantee of Rs. 1 lakh is enhanced to Rs.1.5 lakh. However, condition of Supurtnama for Rs.5 lakhs with one surety in the like amount mentioned in the order dated 8.3.2010 is deleted. Rest of the conditions mentioned in the said order dated 8.3.2010 are maintained. 4 Application is disposed of. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]