IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7044 of 2008 LAXUMAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 16.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offence punishable under sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. is against other accused persons and not against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that from the entire records, it appears that the petitioner has got no connection either with the alleged offence or with the articles stolen in the said incident. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that subsequently in course of investigation a co-villager of the informant disclosed before the police that his motorcycle had been also stolen by some other miscreant, whereafter the petitioner approached the police and said that one Singhasan had kept a motorcycle in his house and when the police recovered the said motorcycle from the house of the petitioner it was found that it belonged to the said person who had given information to the police. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that only on the said ground the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case, although he has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since November, 2007. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition - 2 - is allowed. Let petitioner, namely, Laxuman Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 193 of 2007(G.R.No.2135 of 2007). harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)