HIGH COURT OF CHHATT¥SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITIGN (CL) NO. 2491 OF 2009 Pyisoner No.2324/61, Central Jai}, Bi£aspun Caste Samami, Rh) viéiage Khuysi, PcHce Siation Laipur, District Biiaspur (CG). Versus RESPGNDENTS 1A State cf Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Hame Department DKS Bhawan, 3ecretariat, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (CG). 2‘ Inspector Generai cf PrisoniJaiL Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipua’ (CG). Biiaspur, 3. Dismct Magisfrate!CoHec’tor, District Bikaspw (CG). 4, Super‘mtendent, Central JaiL Biiaspur, D§smc$ Biiaspur (CG). {Wa’it pet§tion under Article 226 of ihe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon‘b!e Shri Satish K. Aggihotri, J. Present :- Ms Savita Tiwari, counsei for the petitioner. Mr Vivek Sharma, Pane! Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL‘ (Passed 0n this ZD‘ day of Juty, 2009) Heard teamed counsel fer the patties. Learned counset appearing for the getitioner! on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the respondent authorities for granting the benefit under the Probation Ruies, 1984. x Learned coun’sel appearing for the State submits that if a representation is tiled under the provisions of law, the same shail be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. in View of foregoing, accorriing to the iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed/oie/ / SN Ag“""°m ’ satish wdge ' PEiiTlONER Sadhelal, $/o Amoii, aged about 40 years, (in Jaii'} U1