IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2008 / 20TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 33866 of 2007(F) ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------- P.R.DANAVAN, S/O. RAJAPPAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKALA, THRIKKAKARA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. VIJI JACKSON, W/O. JACKSON ITTOOP, HOUSE NO.7/527 A, VAZHAKKALA, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 4. JACKSON, S/O. ITTOOP, HOUSE NO.7/527 A, VAZHAKKALA, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX WP(C).No. 33866 of 2007(F) EXT.P1: PHOTOTSTAT COPY OF THE FIR NO. 1272/07 OF THE CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. /True Copy/ P.A To Judge V.RAMKUMAR, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C). No.33866 Of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner who is the de facto complainant in Crime No.1272/2007 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam for offences punishable under Sections 465 and 468 read with 120B and 34 IPC, seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent- S.H.O, Central Police Station to conduct the investigation fairly and properly and submit the final report of the investigation as expeditiously as possible. 2. In the statement submitted by the Sub Inspector of Police, Central Police Station, Ernakulam, it is stated that the allegation of the petitioner is that his signature in two documents dated 13.03.07 and 10.05.07 has been forged and that the investigation so far conducted reveals that the petitioner is a habitual offender in several types of cases like theft, robbery, criminal breach of trust, cheating and forging bogus documents and imitating signatures committed from 1973 onwards and he is a defendant in several civil cases and accused in several criminal cases and that since the signatures in the questioned documents W.P.C.No.33866 of 2007 2 have to be verified through handwriting experts, the investigation can be completed only after such verification. In view of the said statement, I do not think that there is any slackness in the investigation. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent- the S.H.O, Central Police Station, Ernakulam, to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible. (V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) sj