(i^\oa, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG). WRITPETITION (S) N0.7-?/'Z-T(2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER K;^ .'¥^ <J?£Slst)NDENTS ,.1-; g^so^^ ^^^. -Rang Vallabh Sidar, aged about 38 years, son of Shri Sundar Sai Sidar, Government Primar/ School Dhanigaon, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (sl.no.07 of Annexure P-1) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of School Educafion, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raigarh (CG) 01. PARTICULARSABOUTTHEPETmONER 11 M HI6H COURT OF WHAmSSASM AT BIUtSPUR W. P. fs5 No. 7500 of Z006 Petitioner : Ponch Ram Navrang Versus Re^iondents : State of Chhatlisyirh ond tuwther W. P. (s) No. 7501 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Jugal Ram Chnkresh Versus Reqwndents : State of Chhattisgarh and anol+ier W. P. fa) hto. 7502 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Jagdish Chondra yodav Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ono'ther W.P. (s)No. 7B03<rf2006 Petitwner : Dici Sai Paikni Versus Respondents : State of OiherM-isoarh ond onother W. P. (s) No. 7504 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Nandkeshwar Rcan Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhuttj^arh ond anoltier W. P. fs^No TSOSafZW^ Petitioner ; Somelal unte Versus Respondents : Stoite of Chhntt'isaort ond another W. P. fayNo. re08«rf2a)6 Petitwner : Smt. Philomina Kindo Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhanisgarh and another W. P. (slNo. 7S09<rf2006 Petitioner : Shyam Swder Yadw/ tespondents ""•?"i> State of Chhattiscwrh and ano-ther r W. P. (s) No. 7510 af 2006 :^ Petitioner : Hibriyus Ku^ir Versus Respondents : State of Chhof'isoarh and others W. P. fal 7511 rf 2006 Petitioner : Ku. Rojkumari Ddhariyn Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh and others W P. felNo. 7512 uf 2006 Petitioner : Rang Valhbh Sictar Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisoarh c»idoiwther W. P. (s) No. ^513 af Z006 Petitioner : Ramduhr Kedhkar Verais Respondents : State of Chhattisoarh and olhers W. P. (s) No. TC14 of 2006 Petitioner : Pradyumn Kumar Versus tespondents : State of Chhattisoarh ond olhers W. P. (slhfo 7Bl5rf2006 Petitioner : Smt.Lukishiya Minj Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhottiwirh wid onother W. P. (s} No. 7516 af 200& Petitioner : Timo-thiyus Toppo Versus Respondents : S-tate of Chhattisgarh and others W. P. fal No TO17 <rf 2006 Petittoner : Amrit Kumar Versus Reaondents Storte of Chhatl-istlarh end others <»»'aste!*h* ^ P YsVNn 7'?19fff%006 Petitioner :. &ufarEkkn Versus Respondents : State of Chhuttisoarh and olhers W P faVNo 7519 af 2006 Petitioner : Alfrad Kujur Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and onolher W. P. (s)No. 7B21 (rf2006 Petitioner : Probhu Sai Tirky Verais lte^»ondents : State of Oihattisoarh ond others W. P. (s) No 7522 af 2006 Petitioner : Jagannath Ram Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhattisgarh <md others W. P. (sl Nn 7523 <rf 2006 Petjtioner : Atoinar 5ai Rnikni Verais Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh and o-thers W. P. (sV No.7524af 2006 Petitioner ; Smt. Rebeka Minj Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisoarh and olliers W. P. (s) No. 7SSS c# 2006 Petitioner : Ajit Kumar Tirky Versus Respondents : State of Oihottisoarh onddnother And W. P fsiNa TBZfeof 2006 Petitioner : fetmkumar Bm^ire Resoondents versus ^-hxte of Chhattisdarh ond cno-ther !EL _.-. SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. /(gnihBtri. J Alr. A.N. Bhak-ta, Adwcate for the petitioners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, OefHfty Sovemment Advocate for the respondents/State. OR&ER Passed on 9* doy of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Laamed counsel oppeormg for the petitioners as well as leamed Deputy Sovemment Advocate oppearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that 1+ie faet-s of the present cose are similar to tharl' of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tnwari A o*ers Vs. Stffte 6ovt. of Qihatt-i^wh & o-thers), which was allowed vide order dated 7t^ Novemfaer, 2006. They furt+ier submit •that the question of bw involved is also the scnne. 2. In view of the above stated dibmisaons made by teamed counsel for the parties, -these writ petitions ore altowed in tarms of the order dated 7tfl November, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of This order be placed on record m other connected writ petjtions. Subhash SA'- Satish K. Agisi Judge