THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.779 of 2010 JUDGMENT: The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondent herein is the defendant in the suit in O.S.No.287 of 1992. The said suit filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration that he is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and possession of the suit schedule property was decreed partly declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of half of the plaint schedule property and dismissing the rest of the claim of the plaintiff. Aggrieved thereby, the plaintiff preferred A.S.No.150 of 2004 on the file of the V Additional District Judge (FTC) Guntur. The lower appellate court dismissed the appeal confirming the judgment of the trial court. Aggrieved thereby, the plaintiff filed this Second Appeal. I have perused the judgments passed by the trial court as well as the appellate court. I am of the opinion that the trial court, after hearing both sides and after considering the entire material available on record, rightly decreed the suit partly declaring that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of half of the plaint schedule property and dismissing the rest of the claim of the plaintiff. Further, the appellate court, after reappraisal of the entire oral and documentary evidence, rightly dismissed the appeal confirming the judgment and decree of the trial court. In view of the concurrent findings recorded by both the courts below, I do not see any question of law, much less substantial question of law that arises for consideration in the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 30-09-2011 Prv