CW 251/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.251/2009 Akhtar Naim Versus District & Sessions Judge Tonk Date of Order ::: 15/10/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi None, for petitioner. Mr. Jinesh Jain, Government Advocate, for respondent. No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner even in second round. Matter has come up on application filed on 06/03/09 U/Art. 226(3) of the Constitution seeking vacation of ad interim order dt.15/01/09 whereby this Court directed that if petitioner pursuant to impugned order dated 12/12/2008 (Ann.4) has not been relieved so far, he may not be relieved. Vide order impugned dt.12/12/08, petitioner while serving as Senior Personal Assistant has been shifted from the court of ADJ (FT) No.1, Tonk to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tonk, which has been assailed by way of instant petition. However, it has been averred in the reply that since certain courts were abolished, employees of Tonk Judgeship were shifted and as regards present petitioner, because of abolition of Court of ADJ (Fast Track) Tonk, the District Judge Tonk shifted him from ADJ CW 251/09 //2// (Fast Track) No.1, Tonk to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tonk. No counter to the reply of respondent has been filed. Reply to the application seeking vacation has also not been filed since March, 2009. In view of abolition of court at Tonk, petitioner has been shifted from the court of ADJ (Fast Track) No.1, Tonk to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Tonk. Thus, present posting of petitioner otherwise also cannot be said to be his transfer and shifting him from one court to another by District Judge Tonk was in the interest of administration This Court does not find any justification to interfere in the order impugned. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Ad interim order dt. 15/01/09 also stands vacated. No costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 251CW09-Oct15Ds-226(3)Ald..doc