lfb HIGH COURT OB CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETmONfCr.^ No. 2617 of2009 PETITIONERS : 1. 8mt. Niharika Vaishnav, wife ofShri Manish Vaishnav, aged 21 years, Occupation Service, Presently Posted as Shiksha Kamii Gra4e III, Govemment Primary School Belpaaa., Teteil & Block Takhatpur, Distriet Bilaspur, resident of village Barela, Tehsil Mungeli, DNrict Bilaspur(CG) 2. Manish Vaishnav, son of Shri Ashwini Vaishnav, aged 22 yeax^, occupation Busmess^ Resident of village Barela, Tehsil Mungeliy District Bilaspur (CG) VER8U8 RESPONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, throu^i the Secretary, Department ofHome, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur (CG) 3. The Supermten<tent of Police, District Bilaspw. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Police) Kota, DistrictBilaspur(CG) 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Takhatpur- District Bilaspur. 6. Shri Ashok Kumar Dubey Occupation Service, presently posted as Tectmician. Public Ifealth and Engineermg Departm^nt Lormi^ residCTt of Nigarband Road Takhatpur, Di^riat Bilaspur. PETmON L1NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'IITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Stoi Satish K. Asiriliotrf. J. Present: Shri S.Rathore, Advocate for the petitioffier. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Goveanment Advoeate forthe State/respondents 1 to 5. '•f^^n^ ^n OMDERJORAL) (Passed on 30m day of June, 2009) Uamed counsel appearing for the petitioners svbmits ttmt the petitioner No. 1 aiid 2 have entercd into mter-caste marriage and as such, fhey have apprehension from the fafher of the petitioner No, 1, as the fafter of petitioner No. l, i.e. the respondent No. 6 has lodged an FJ.R. before the respondent No» 5 agamst the petitioner No. 2 regardmg abdiictioin of th^ petitioner No. 1. Leamed counsd further submits fhat the petiticmers hav€? threat to their life and property* Having regard to the facts situation ofthe case, the respondent autfaorities shall take appropriate steps to provide security to the petitioners. if osi mvestigation^it m found tfaat the petitioners have apprehensi<»and dmger to lieir life and property. In the meantinie, the petitionersi may make apprqpriate complairrt before ttie concemed authority, tf so advised. , In view ofthe above^ the petition staxids disposed of. Sd/- , _ satisb^rboul Armt