Criminal Misc. No. M-7129 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-7129 of 2011 Date of decision : 21.03.2011 Rahul ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner vide FIR No. 175 dated 15.12.2010 under Sections 363/366/376/506/120-B IPC at Police Station Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner has been in custody since December, 2010, investigation of the case has been completed and challan presented before the competent court of jurisdiction. He has referred to statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and submits that from the statement it is clear that marriage was solemnized between the petitioner and prosecutrix. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that allegations against the petitioner are serious. He submits that Criminal Misc. No. M-7129 of 2011 2 age of the prosecutrix is relevant factor to be taken into consideration by this court. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Without commenting anything on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that investigation of the case has already been completed and petitioner has been in custody since December, 2010, I am of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody any longer. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari. March 21, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE