Writ Petition (S) No. 713-S OT200S Petitioner Respontients Sulabh.Ram Netam, aged 62 yeare, son of Shri Bhagat Singh Netam, retired Head Master Middfe Sohooi, Bftkul!, Block Kota, at' present resident of:village Litiya, post pffice Kargikhrd, Tehsii.Kota, DistrlGt Bi'aspur (CG). , : Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, thrpugh the Seoretary, Department of Schooi Eduoatton, Raipur. 2) The Distriot Education, Bilaspur,, district Biiaspur 3) Block Education Offioer, Kota, DtstrictBilaspur 4) Acoountant Genera!, Chhattisgarh, at Raipur. 5) The Senior Account Offioer, office of the Accountant-Generai, Chhattisgarh accounts, 7, PagaFrya Bhavan, Raipur (CG). ' , ; (.Writ Petition under Artiole 226/227 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bteMr. Satlsh K. Agnihotri,J. Shri Somnath Verma, counsel fo.rthe petitioner, Shri Amrito Das, Panei Lawyer for the State. Shri Ajay Baraik, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri'S.K. Beriwal, StandingCounsel for Union of India. VVith oonsent of learned counsel appearing for tbe parties, the matter is heardfinaily. . This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retiral dues. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mancial Vs; The State of Chhattisgarti & others) and other connected maters, directed the Committee to conslder the .matter of retriai dues as the disputed question offacts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuanf to fhe order dated 19-06-2006 Rassed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keia Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and ora'er datsd 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgai-h and othere Vs. Baijnath Mandal and anotlier). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judg.me.nt and order ciated 31st Janua.ry, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) ) as submitted by learned counse! appearing for the parties. . . . 2) This petition is aceordingty disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of tbe Advocate Qeneral is directed to send the oase to the Committee, Vtiithin a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a oopy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shali issue notice to the petitioner and the ofnoers concerned, wjthin a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accorda.nce with law, after affording proper opportunity of heartng to the petitioner. The petitioner and. the offioers ooncerned may fiie aclditional .documents, if necessary. The entire exeroise, including payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner, becompietedvifithinaperiodoffour months from thedate ofreceipt ofa copy of this order. 3) The petitioner shall supply one complete set or the petition to the Stare counsel as well as to the oounselforUnion of tndia fortransferring ttesame to theCommittee. . , i i sa/- Satish K.Agnihotri ' ' ' : ' . / ' . [ : , Judge M IB B Raju k:.-.^.sw>^^^