IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Rev.No.123 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 13.08.2009 Savita ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.Ajai Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Yash Pal Malik, AAG, Haryana. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that there were multiple injuries inflicted to the complainant but still the Court below while upholding the conviction ordered the release of the respondents-accused on probation exercising the powers under Section 360 Cr.P.C. He contends that once the conviction has been upheld by the Court, then at least the fine should have been increased by it. Having regard to the facts of the present case and on the perusal of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari dated 17.10.2008, I find that the impugned order is fully justified and does not call for any interference by this Court. The learned trial Court while considering the age of Gyani Ram, whose age is about 65 years, and his wife being a handicap, Sudhir who was a juvenile besides the fact that Sudershan Kumar was the only sole bread earner of the family and was also married, rightly gave the benefit of the probation to the respondents-accused The reasons which have been assigned for exercising the said powers by Crl.Rev.No.123 of 2009 -2- the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari are fully justified and do not call for any interference by this Court. In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed. August 13, 2009 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE