The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.25547 of 2011 Date: 13.09.2011 Between: M/s.Delta Marine Company, rep. by its sole proprietor, Sri Daljit Singh Anand, S/o.Sri Avatar Singh, 64 years, regd.office, Delta House, 18th Road, Khar, West, Mumbai – 400052 ..... Petitioner AND 1.The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Ravi Cheemalapati Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri N.Ranga Reddy, SC for GHMC. The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from Flat Nos.G1, G2, G3 and G4, forming part of premises bearing Door No.7-5-46 of Pandurangapuram, Waltair Ward, Visakhapatnam, and demolish the structures raised therein, without notice, as illegal and arbitrary. According to the petitioner- M/s.Delta Marine Company, it is in occupation of the above-mentioned flats; that its vendor has made an application, seeking regularization of certain constructions made in deviation of the sanctioned plan, on 03-01-1992, by paying compounding fee under the Building Regularisation Scheme, which was in force at that time; that subsequently, it has purchased the flats and; that no proceedings were issued rejecting the said application. On an apprehension that the officials of respondent No.2 are likely to demolish certain structures without even issuing a notice, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. At the hearing, Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, representing respondent No.2, on instructions, submitted that the staff of respondent No.2- Corporation had merely identified the portions, which were allegedly constructed in deviation of the sanctioned plan and that, so far, no steps have been taken for removing the same. He further submitted that respondent No.2, which is contemplating to take action against the unauthorised constructions, will follow due process of law before taking such action. The aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel is placed on record and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.31476 of 2011, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 13th September, 2011 LUR