»- HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BiLASPUR Writ Petition (SS No. 610 of2007 1) Chandrika Singh Patel, S/o. Shri UsatRam Patei, aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher posted at Primary Schooi, Nawapara (Bhupdevpur), Biock Kharsiya, Dist. Raigarh, CG. 2) Ramakant Sharma, S.o. Shri Paras Ram Sharma, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, posted at Primary School Rampur, Biock Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, CG. 3) Kartik Ram Patel, S/o. Shri Puran Singh Patel, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, posted af Adim Jati Kalyan Prlmary School Dhimani, Block Kharsiya, Dist. Raigarh, CG. 4) Ishwar Prasad Patei, S/o. Shri Govind Ram Patel, aged about 42 years, Asslstant Teacher, posted at Middie Schooi Nansiya Block - Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, CG. 5) Yashwant Patel, S/o. Shri Hansh Ram Patel, aged about years, Assistant Teacher, posted at Mlddle Schoo! Farkanara, Block Kharsiya Dist. Raigarh, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Education Department, D.KS. Bhawan, Raipur.CG. 2) Commissioner, Tribai Welfare Department, Raipur, CG. 3) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department Head Office Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, IJ. 4) District Coordinator, Tribal Welfare Department, Head Office Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, CG. (Writ Petition underArticie 226 ofthe Constitutton of India for issuance ofwrit in nature of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and other suitable writ or writs, direction or directions, ordsr or orders). (SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) PRESENT^--: Shri R.S. Patei, counsel forthe petitioners. ¥- Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. ,'. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 23rd April 1. The question of law involved herein as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale wlth sffect from the date of initial appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitloners as weil as for the State/respondents jointly submit thst the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhqttisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7-11 -2006. 3. In view of the above stated submission made by learned counse! for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as fo costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju ^£VSSa^^S^:^:^S?ss^^^^^?^.'^a:<'?.L^'s.sgB?'i^e':,i^fe?r.'E^?"i^5;^^s®'ss2^?^tes%'^wS%.s3E