IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55727 of 2007 PANKAJ PASWAN & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 1.9.2008 Mr Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this application, petitioners no.2, 3 and 4, namely, Shaligram Paswan, Manhai Paswan and Muchakun Paswan, respectively, have been arrested and as such this application as against them has become infructuous. This application, as against petitioners no.2, 3 and 4 is, accordingly, dismissed. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner no.1 and the State. Petitioner no.1 Pankaj Paswan is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No.11/2007 for the alleged offences registered under section 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner no.1 has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion and during investigation also no material has come specifically against this petitioner - 2 - except suspicion. Considering the above, it is directed that the petitioner no.1 Pankaj Paswan, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No.11/2007, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)