IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT APPEAL No.1780 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal against the Order dated 01/08/2002 in W.P. No.9660 OF 2002 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shameerpet (M), Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Sub-Registar, Shameerpet, Ranga Reddy District. ..... APPELLANT(S) (Respondents In W.P.) AND 1. Smt.Zarina, W/o.Shiraz Ali lakhani, R/o10-8, Triveni Complex, Abid Road, Hyderabad. 2 Smt.Rafiqa, W/o.Iraq Ali Lakhani, R/o.9-E, Triveni complex,Abid Road, Hyderabad. 3 Hussain Ali Lakhani,S/o.Hassan Ali Lakhani, Triveni complex,Abid Road, Hyderabad. 4 Smt.Shanaz,W/o.Hameed Ali Lakhani, R/o.37/B, Kareemabad Coop. Housing Society, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad. 5 M/s.Shakti Constructions,at 17-21, JSN.Colony, St.No.8, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, rep by its Mg.Partner. 6 V.Venkateswarlu,S/o.Pedda Malliah, R/o.Flat No.207, Devi Gardens, Habsiguda, Hyderabad. Respondents 1 to 4 are represented by their Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. M. Jagan Mohan Reddy .....RESPONDENT(S) (Petitioners in W.P.) Counsel for the Appellants: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. : MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO The Court made the following : JUDGMENT:(Per BRSR,J) Pursuant to the compromise entered into by and between the parties, the Temple – Sri Seetha Ramaswamy Temple of Devaryamjal village, Secunderabad, relinquished all its rights, title and interest in the land in question as is evident from the proceedings, dated 10-12-2002. The proceedings reveal that the Temple had already received consideration at the rate of Rs.1,80,000/- per acre and altogether received Rs.29,02,500/- . It is also brought to our notice that pursuant to the directions of this Court, the Registrar of Assurances, the 3rd appellant herein, had already registered the document and released the same in favour of the respondents. In such view of the matter, no further orders as such are required to be passed in this writ appeal. No interference with the order of the learned single Judge is called for. The Writ Appeal shall accordingly stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________________ B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J Date:21-07-2004 _________________________ K.C. BHANU, J PV To 1) The District Collector Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2) The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shameerpet (M), Ranga Reddy District. 3) The Sub-Registrar, Shameerpet, Ranga Reddy District. 4) Two C.D. copies.