THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition (M/S) No. 57 of 2006 Prakash S/O Shri Buddhu R/O Village Peepli, Post Laxur, District Haridwar. … Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Labour Court Dehradun. … Respondent. Ms. Jyotsna, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Nand Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. Dated February 17, 2006. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard. By means of this writ petition the petitioner prays for issue of a writ, order or direction directing the Labour Court Dehradun to decide the Suit No. 3 H/02 Shri Prakash Vs. M/S R.B.Narain Singh Sugar Mills, Laksar, District Haridwar, (Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition) expeditiously with the allegations that the petitioner was working as motor attendant for more than 28 years in the R.B.Narayan Singh sugar Mills, Laksar, District Hardwar as permanent labour and he was illegally terminated by the employer by its order dated 30-12-2002. Aggrieved by said order, the petitioner filed a suit, which was ultimately referred to the Labour Court Dehradun on 22-04-2003 for adjudication of the dispute. The petitioner is an old man, aged 59 years. It is stated that the petitioner would have been retiring in the month of October 2006, had he not been terminated. The dispute is pending before the Labour Court since the year 2003. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the material placed on record, direction for expeditious disposal need to be issued to the respondent. The Additional Labour Commissioner Uttaranchal, Garhwal Region, Dehradun, is directed to decide the case No. 3 H/02, Prakash Vs. M/s R.B.Narayan Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. Laksar (Haridwar), pending disposal before him, preferably within a period of six months. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) 17.02.2006. RCP