IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16671 of 2007 Dr. Triveni Nath Sukla 'Rajan', son of Shri Panchanand Shukla, resident of Village Chanakyapuri Near Utterwari Pokhara, P.O. Bettiah, P.S. Bettiah, Dist. West Champaran. ---------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Health Department, Bihar Govt., Patna. 3. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. --------- Respondents ------ 2 22.12.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is with regard to grant of first and second time bound promotion as also fixing pension on the basis of the same. The respondents, in their counter affidavit, have explained that the petitioner was already given first time bound promotion with effect from 14.3.1989 vide letter no. 119(4) dated 22.5.1990. It has also been clarified that the petitioner is not entitled for second time bound promotion, which has stood abolished with effect from 1.1.1986, inasmuch as, his twenty-five years of service could have been completed only in the year 2004. As with regard to revision of retirement benefit in the counter affidavit, it has been stated that the Accountant 2 General is expected to make revision of pension in view of the departmental notification no. 914(3) dated 16.11.2007. Additionally, it has also been clarified that the petitioner has also been granted the benefit of first and second A.C.P. and as such, the writ application of the petitioner has become infructuous. These facts have not been controverted by the petitioner in the rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed by him, wherein, he has only tried to explain the scope of the writ application by also questioning the grant of certain pay-scale. In the considered opinion of this Court, the writ application after grant of first time bound promotion and two A.C.P. has become infructuous. That being so, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)