IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37416 of 2008 Ram Bachan Yadav & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 2 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although the charge sheet has been filed against these petitioners, the Court below has taken cognizance for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302/120 I.P.C. On perusal of the order this Court finds that the Judicial Magistrate is well aware of the facts of the case and after considering the facts has taken cognizance The Court has noted that a charge sheet was submitted showing these petitioners to be absconders. Cognizance was taken against other accused persons but for some reason or the other, could not be taken against these absconders, who are petitioners before this court. Therefore the Court has come to the conclusion that it is wrong to submit that the charge sheet had not been submitted against these petitioners. Considering the reasons given by the Court below I find no illegality in the impugned order. This application is thus dismissed. Prakash ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )