IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10599 of 2008 Date of decision: 21.01.2010 Dr. Ravinder Talwar ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents 1 to 3. Mr. Kapil Sharma, Advocate, for respondents 4 to 6. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) To a complaint by the petitioner that the termination made of the services of the petitioner without any notice or enquiry was invalid, the response on behalf of the respondents was that the claim of the petitioner for reconsideration relating to the termination of the services has been examined and they will take a decision soon. Having regard to the plea made by the respondents, the counsel for the petitioner states that he will have no objection if the issue is reconsidered by the Civil Writ Petition No.10599 of 2008 - 2 - authority within a stipulated time. It is directed that the respondents shall take the decision within a period of 8 weeks from today. The petitioner will have an independent right to canvass the correctness of the decision if he feels aggrieved by the manner of consideration undertaken by the respondents presently. Subject to this liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 21.01.2010. sanjeev