HIGH C913??? OF CHHAW§$GARH3 8§L§$P§R i Writ Petitbn $3 Nu. §$$$ df 2%08 I $mt. Archana Sa‘nu, Wio‘ Beriugapai Sam): aged Taiwan about 30 Dongargarh years, Rkw‘. EEEst Vii‘agn éaj§agdégon I aibahadur (Céi Nagarx § i x > Respondents Versus 1) ‘€a€e 3f Chhatt§§garhx thmug’n Secretary, Panohayat 8:. Wiage Deveiéoment Vikns Department: Mantrmaya al' f'\l/ MKS. Bhawan, Ramgr‘ ‘ Colieotcr, Rajiv Gandhi Sh§ksha Mis3ion, {3&3‘: Rajnandgaon. 3) Bicok Educaticn Offncer, Dongargar‘n; DE‘: — Ra}nandgaen. Vikas Gandhi Khanv‘ Shiksha Btock Mission, Resource Dan‘gargam, Co ordmator Rajiv Dist. Rajiwandgaan b) Chief Executive Officer, ZHa Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, Dist Ra}nandgaon (CG). (Writ Pet'rtion under Articfe 226 of the Canétitutmn of indiaj $3: Honvbie Mr. swish K. Agnmm, a. 3hr§ HS. Ahluwa¥§a5 counseHerthe petiticner. t: hri AS‘ Kachhawaha, Deputy Azivcxcate Genera! }‘0r ihe Sta’te‘ ORAL ORWER wassee’ on 3'3 ~3-2a083 Learnea‘ counsei appearing fer the pemiener submlis ‘mat the petit‘soner does moi wani ‘20 contest ihis matter on merit. However. the petittoner seeks ttberty to make a representation to toe respondents—authorities in the Eight of iodgment and order passed by this Court in the matter of Kis‘hore Kama! Vyas Vs. $tate of C.G. amt others (2W8 {1) CGLJ 2%} and the same be decioeci xpee‘itiousryr 2) si is ordered as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, this oetition is dispoeeoi of with the above iiberry. Sd/- Rlaju i i i Satish K. Agnihniri’ r I ‘ Judge ' rL . -» igerh, , Petitioner Present: