IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 110 of 2009 Date of decision : January 08, 2009 Jai Parkash ... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Sumeet Goel,Advocate for the petitioner. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J The present petition has been filed claiming fixation of pay in the revised pay scale. It is not disputed that the services of the petitioner were terminated and on reference made to the Labour Court he was directed to be reinstated but without back wages or continuity of service. The petitioner challenged that award by way of CWP No. 6228 of 2006 claiming that he should have been granted back wages and continuity of service. The said writ petition is pending. In the face of the pendency of that writ petition it would not be open to the petitioner to file the second writ petition for what would necessarily be a consequential relief in case the first writ petition is allowed. Consequently this writ petition is dismissed being not maintainable. January 08, 2009 ( AJAY TEWARI ) sunita JUDGE