,.., • $-31 r * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3521/2010 MEHMOOD HASSAN & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER % 12.11.2010 This petition has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing a criminal complaint. The present petition has been filed after framing of charge. I consider that the petitioner was at liberty to argue before the trial court concerned at the time of framing charge. The learned trial court came to conclusion that there was sufficient material to frame charge. If the petitioner was aggrieved by the charge, the remedy available to the petitioner was to file a revision petition against charge and not quashing of criminal complaint. The petition is hereby dismissed would be at liberty as available under law. NOVEMBER 12, 2010 rd petitioner Signing Date:06.08.2024 17:06:00 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified