HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 269 of 2001 DATE:08.07.2010 Between: Yallabandi Vijayalakshmi … Petitioner And Achanta Subrahmanya Prabhakararao @ Subbarao and others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.269 of 2001 JUDGMENT: This revision is directed against the order dated 24.11.2000 passed by the learned Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, in Crl.M.P.No.2199 of 2000 in Cr.No.37 of 2008 of Tadepalligudem Town Police Station. 2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the defacto complainant filed a private complaint before the Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tadepalligudem, against respondents 1 to 9 herein alleging the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120-B r/w Section 34 IPC. The learned Magistrate referred the complaint to Tadepalligudem Town P.S., for investigation and report. Having received the complaint, the police registered Crime No.37 of 2000 and after completion of investigation referred the case as false by a report dated 29.02.2000. Being aggrieved by the same, the defacto complainant filed a protest petition in Crl.M.P.No.2199 of 2000 and the same was dismissed on 24.11.2000. The same is under challenge in this revision. 3. Heard both sides. 4. This Court admitted the revision and ordered notices to the unofficial respondents on 05.02.2002. As the notices sent to respondents 3 and 6 to 8 were not served, by an order dated 05.11.2009 this Court as a last chance permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the correct address of respondents 3 and 6 to 8, failing which the Criminal Revision Case shall stand dismissed against the said respondents without reference to the Court and posted the case to 03.12.2009. Subsequently, as the counsel for the petitioner did not furnish the correct address of the respondents 3 and 6 to 8, as per the orders of this Court dated 05.11.2009 this Criminal Petition is dismissed against the said respondents. 5. Now coming to the other respondents, it is a fact that the police referred the case as false taking the statement of the defacto complainant that the matter was settled out of court. When once the complainant stated that the matter was compromised and she is no more interested in getting the matter prosecuted, it is not known as to how and why she has chosen to file the protest petition. In the light of the above, this Court is of the view that the revision is devoid of merits and as such the same is liable to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 8th July, 2010. CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.269 of 2001 (Dismissed) 8th July, 2010 CBS