IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1225 of 2006 Date of Decision:09.09.2010 Gurmeet Kaur & anr. .... petitioners Versus Smt.Saroj Aggarwal & anr. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioners None for respondent No.1 Mr.J.S.Gill, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 states that he has died on 25.02.2010. Vide order dated 21.08.2007, this COCP was admitted only qua respondent No.2. Since the sole contemner has died, this contempt petition does not survive. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 09.09.2010 neenu