vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.940 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.940 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.940 OF 2008 P.V. Dabholkar ... Petitioner V/s. L.M. Shiveshwarkar & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.C.S. Joshi for Petitioner Mrs.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent-State CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JUNE 19, 2008 JUNE 19, 2008 JUNE 19, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The application filed by the accused before the Sessions Court in criminal Appeal No.145 of 2007 has been dismissed by the Sessions Court on 29.3.2008. The Sessions Court has observed that no specific grounds were set out as to why the appellant could not place before the Court the material that he desires to place now. Further, the permission to lead additional evidence is denied as the appellant has not stated precisely why he could not bring forthwith that evidence before the trial Court and on what points the additional evidence is required to be taken. 2. In my view, this order of the Sessions Court cannot be faulted as all that the appellant i.e the petitioner herein, has stated in his application is that through inadvertence proper evidence has not been levied : 2 : and that such evidence is required to be placed before the Court in the interests of justice. 3. This vague application has rightly been dismissed by the appellate Court. However, the petitioner/appellant may file a proper application before the Court giving the requisite particulars and the Court will decide it on its own merits irrespective of the fact that the earlier application has been rejected on 29.3.2008. 4. Petition Dismissed.