IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2009 / 1ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 831 of 2009(Y) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------- K.A. NISAR, S/O. ABOOBACKER, KARUKAPADATH HOUSE, VENNALA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, MARADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MARADU ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2009, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 35054 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos. 35054 of 2008 & 831of 2009 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Exhibit P2 proceedings of R.T.A, where permit has been granted to the 3rd respondent, subject to the settlement of timings and subject to the production of road fitness certificate, is challenged by a rival operator on the ground that there is no circumstances to justify the grant of permit by the circulation. In my view, if aggrieved, the remedy available to the petitioners is to seek statutory remedy of appeal. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to that right of the petitioners. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm