IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23608 of 2011 Vivekanand Singh @ Lat Singh, Son of Chandrika Pd. Singh, Resident of Village – Baikatpur, P.S. – Khusrupur, District – Patna. Versus The State Of Bihar . ----------- 2 20.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pradeep Narayan Kumar, learned APP. This is the second attempt for grant of bail in anticipation of arrest. Earlier, after hearing the parties and considering the seriousness of the allegation this court had rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on 26.03.2011 vide Cr. Misc. No. 44339 of 2010. The case relates to offences registered under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code, and subsequently, Sections 120B, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal code were added. Earlier, while rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail this court had issued specific direction to the petitioner to surrender before the court below within one month from the date of order. Surprisingly, the second petition has been filed for granting anticipatory bail oblivious of the fact that earlier while rejecting the anticipatory bail petition the petitioner was directed to surrender before the court below. Once the prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected by this court with specific direction to surrender before the court below within specified period there was no reason for filing subsequent petition for the same relief. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has not brought any provision to the notice of the court which provides power of review or recall of an order under the Code of Criminal Procedure. On the contrary, Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure puts a bar for reviewing /recalling an order/judgment passed by a court. Since there was specific direction to surrender before the court below while rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail, the second anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable and same stands rejected. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)