IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 34913 of 2010(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- AMMINI VARGHESE, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O.LATE V.A.VARGHESE, VELLOOCHERIL HOUSE, KARACKAL P.O., KARACKAL MURI, PERINGARA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.P.HARIDAS, SMT.S.SIKKY. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA – 685 546. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND RECORDS, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN – 685 596. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 34913 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P3. By Ext.P3, an application made by the petitioner for correction of revenue records, reducing the width of a pathway from 2 metres into 2 feet, was rejected. From the pleadings, it is seen that in regard to the very same pathway, there are civil disputes, which are now pending in appeal before the Sub Court, Pathanamthitta. Further, it is also seen that if the correction sought for by the petitioner is allowed, that will have a direct impact on the outcome of the aforesaid appeal. Therefore, it is for that reason, that by Ext.P3, the request has been rejected. 2. In my view, there is nothing illegal in the view that is taken in Ext.P3, and therefore, I am not in a position to find fault with Ext.P3. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp