1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2189 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 3111 OF 2009 Dhule Municipal Corporation Dhule.. .. Applicant Versus Shantilal Mishrilal Bafna .. .. Respondent Shri S. P. Shah, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 28TH APRIL, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 02. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the suit is barred by limitation. On merits the applicant has good case. 2 The applicant had deposited half of the decreetal amount (around Rs. 8,25,000/-) in the trial Court. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent Shri Kulkarni submits that the suit is within the period of limitation. The trial Court after going through the evidence decreed the suit. 4. Record and proceedings is called for. We have perused the same. After considering the submissions, we are of the opinion that the appellant/applicant has failed to make out case for stay of execution of decree. The civil application for stay of the impugned judgment and decree is rejected. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/April.10