IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2011 / 28TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18519 of 2011(L) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ADV.SURESH BABU.P.K, S/O.KUMARAN, AGED 33, `C' BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR, NANDHANAM APARTMENTS, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR-3. BY ADV. SRI.C.PRABIN BENNY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. KOLAZHY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TIRUR, MULAGUNNATHUKAVU P.O-680 581, THRISSUR. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE P.O.-680 003, THRISSUR. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 001. 4. SENIOR GEOLOGIST, THRISSUR DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, MINI CIVIL STATION, CHEMBUKKAVU, THRISSUR-680 001. 5. SHOBA CITY, KERALA, PUZHAKKAL P.O., THRISSUR-680 553. 6. VAYALOOR REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD.NO.13,RAGAVEERA AVENUE, PIOUS GARGEN CHENNAI-600 086, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 7. VAYALOOR DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD., NO.13 RAGAVEERA AVENUE, PIOUS GARGEN, CHENNAI-600 086. 8. VAYALOOR BUILDERS PVT.LTD.,NO.13 RAGAVEERA AVENUE, PIOUS GARGEN, CHENNAI-600 086. 9. SHOBA DEVELOPERS LTD., E-106, SUNRISE CHAMBER, ULOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042. R2 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. --------------------------------------------- WP (C) No. 18519 of 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner who is a lawyer by profession has approached this Court with the following prayers: “(i) Issue a writ in the form of direction directing the 4th respondent to produce the entire records relating to Exhibit P10. (ii) Issue a writ in the form of direction directing the respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose Exhibit P6 and Exhibit P7 respectively within a time frame. (iii) Issue a writ in the form of direction directing the respondents 2, 3 and 4 to conduct the Environmental Impact study before issuing transport permit of clay to the respondents 5 to 9. (iv) Issue a writ in the form of direction directing the Respondents 5 to 9 to refill the excavated area using the clay kept near the excavated area and also direct the Respondents 1 to 4 ensure the same. (v) Issue a writ in the form of direction directing the 4th respondent to issue permit for excavation of clay only after the Environmental Impact Study. (vi) Issue a writ in the form of direction directing the 4th respondent not to issue transit permit to the Respondents 5 to 9 to transport the clay excavated without sanction”. WP (C) No. 18519 of 2011 2 Going by the pleadings and materials on record it appears that the petitioner has projected a case which is not connected with any of his individual rights. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission to withdraw the writ petition, without prejudge to the right of the petitioner to bring up the grievance involving the public cause before the appropriate court. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. rkc