SCA/1336219/1994 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 13362 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= JAGDISH HIRALAL RAJPUT & 9 - Petitioner(s) Versus A'BAD MUNI. CORPORATION & 3 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR KETAN A DAVE for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 10. MS.MAHROOK N.KERRAVALA, ADVOCATE FOR TANNA ASSOCIATES for Respondent(s) : 1, DELETED for Respondent(s) : 2, LAW OFFICER BRANCH for Respondent(s) : 3, MR JB PARDIWALA for Respondent(s) : 3, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 4, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date : 15/12/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1 This petition was admitted vide order dated SCA/1336219/1994 2/3 JUDGMENT 6.7.1995. Before that, vide order dated 28.12.1994 this Court had while issuing notice recorded : “Municipal Corporation may make suggestion regarding the alternative place to be given to those who were already having larri-stand licences from amongst the petitioners”. 2 Thereafter, it appears that there were suggestions and counter suggestions by both the sides in relation to the alternative site at which the petitioners may carry on business as hawkers, but the parties could not finalise the site. Today, vide Additional Affidavit dated 15.12.2008, the respondent-corporation has placed on record individual orders dated 12.12.2008 whereby each one of the petitioners has been informed about the site at which the concerned petitioner may carry on the business after obtaining necessary hawker's licence. 3 Hence, in light of the orders dated 12.12.2008, the grievance ventilated in the petition does not survive and the petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- SCA/1336219/1994 3/3 JUDGMENT (D.A.Mehta, J.) M.M.BHATT