AB 36/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mrs. K. Kalita Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. The C.D. as called for has been produc ed. I have perused the same. The informant/ complainant and the accused petitioners Sri Basanta Barman and Sr i Dilip Barman are close door neighbours and they have been maintaining good re lationship. On the other hand there is a complaint case filed by the wife of acc used Sri Jon Barman who was arrested and enlarged on bail already. It appears th at there has been some mis-understanding between the accused and the informant a nd the FIR and counter FIR has been filed against each other. However, there is no such material disclosing that a serious fight took place or there was seriou s injury on the person of any of the parties. Considering the nature of allegation and the scanty materials, I direct that in the event of arrest in connection with Belsor P.S. Case No. 220/2010 u/s. 143/44 8/325/354/380/ Addl. Section 395/397 IPC the accused petitioners named above sha ll be enlarged on bail of Rs. 10,000/-each with one local surety of the like amo unt subject to satisfaction of the Arresting Authority. However, the accused pet itioners shall appear in person before the I.O. concerned within 10 days from to day for recording their statement and interrogation in accordance with law. They shall also co-operate with the Investigating agency as and when required and sh all not jump the bail. The bail application stands disposed of.