1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.13748/2008 (Mahendra Versus The State of Rajasthan) Date of Order :: 7th January, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GUMAN SINGH By post. Mr. B.K. Sharma, Deputy Government Counsel for the State Heard learned counsel for the State. 2. The convict-petitioner has moved this application for second parole of 30 days, wherein he has mentioned that he was convicted under Section 302 IPC to imprisonment for life. Earlier he was granted first parole of 20 days and his conduct during that period was very good. Thereafter he was also granted emergent parole and there was no complaint against him during that period also. He again became eligible for second parole of 30 days and he moved an application for the same but his case was not included for consideration in the meeting by the Parole Committee, therefore, his case may be considered and he may be granted second parole by this Court. 3. The learned Counsel for the State 2 informs that he has received a letter dated 24th December, 2008 from Superintendent, Central Jail, Kota wherein it has been admitted by him that petitioner is eligible for second parole of 30 days and his case was also forwarded for consideration to District Magistrate, Kota, but his case was not included in the meeting, which took place on 23rd June, 2008. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the State has assured that his case will now be considered definitely in the quarterly meeting by the District Parole Advisory Committee. 4. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the State as well as the contents of the application of the convict- petitioner, we are of the view that unless the matter is examined by the District Parole Advisory Committee for second parole, it will not be proper for this Court to consider the case directly in absence of any specific reasons for not considering the case of the petitioner or not granting him second parole. We think it fit and proper to direct the District Parole Advisory Committee to consider the case of the petitioner in the next meeting. 5. Consequently the writ petition is 3 disposed of with the direction to the District Parole Advisory Committee to consider the case of the petitioner for second parole of 30 days in the next meeting positively. 6. A copy of this order may be sent to the District Magistrate, Kota for compliance. A copy of this order may also be sent to the convict-petitioner for information. (GUMAN SINGH), J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK