1 WP 2949/2011 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2949 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Amit Borkar i/b Mr. Vinesh V. Purvant for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Shah for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 20TH JULY 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Being directed against an interlocutory order, I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Even otherwise, in my view, the 2 WP 2949/2011 lower appellate Court has exercised the discretion in appropriate manner for refusing the injunction. The petitioner, who claims that the respondent has agreed to sell the property to him under an agreement for sale, has claimed an injunction restraining the respondent from selling the property to a third party. Such application has been filed without claiming the relief of specific performance. In fact, the petitioner was a defendant in the suit filed by the respondent for injunction restraining him from disturbing the possession of the respondent. In such a suit the petitioner could not have claimed an injunction against the respondent against alienation. There is no merit in the writ petition which is hereby rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)