Cr.MPM 199 of 2008 3.4.2008 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General, For the respondent. Sh. Madan Lal, SDPO, Amb, District Una, is present in person. As per the averments made in the petition, the allegation in respect of offence under the Act is that the petitioner called the complainant “choti jaat va apne ko unchi jaat ka samajh kar yeh kritaya kiya.” The case of the petitioner is that in fact he has purchased the disputed land vide sale deed, copy of which has been attached herewith and that the dispute is civil in nature. I have perused the record. It is apparent that there is a dispute between the two parties with regard to some land and these allegations are virtually an extension of said dispute. Keeping in view the fact that there is already existing dispute between the parties, at this stage, it would not be appropriate to reject the bail application of the petitioner. Therefore, the ad interim order dated 14.3.2008 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. The petition stands disposed of. April 3, 2008(K) ( Deepak Gupta ), J.