CWP(T) No. 13316 of 2008. 13.11.2009. Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. The petitioner was put under suspension on account of the disciplinary proceedings. Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the disciplinary proceedings were never initiated against his client. He then contended that the retiral benefits of his client have been withheld illegally. We are of the considered view that since no disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner, the retiral benefits could not be withheld by the respondents. The retiral benefits could not also be withheld on the basis of a Civil Suit filed by his colleague where he was added as a party defendant. Consequently, the respondents are directed to release the retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of ten weeks from today. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. 13h November, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)