IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16217 of 2010 UMANATH TIWARI SON OF MAHAVIR TIWARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 31.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364, 379, 120B, 364A, 323 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report but subsequently confessional statements of the petitioner as well as other co-accused were recorded and the petitioner was put on test identification parade in which he was identified by the informant. The submission is that the informant was well known to the petitioner, despite which he did not name in the first information report. However, considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the long incarceration of the petitioner. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )