IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1785 of 2007 MD.MUSHLIM SAH Versus SAIMUL KHATOON ----------- 2. 29.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order directing the petitioner to pay certain interim maintenance cannot be questioned on the ground that the wife has already entered into a second marriage. That may be a good ground for the court below to reject the application of maintenance filed by the wife but when the petitioner has not challenged the order dated 13.11.2006 and has allowed the same to become final, the subsequent impugned order dated 28.6.2007 cannot be questioned by him in a indirect manner. This Court would not find any merit in this application and the same is dismissed with an observation that all the issues with regard to the wife having already entered a second marriage will be raised by the petitioner at the appropriate stage before passing of the final order. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/