CR No. 6957 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6957 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: October 26, 2010 Smt. Champa Goyal ...Petitioner Versus Bikram Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. SR Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by Champa Goyal-petitioner/plaintiff against the order dated 17.9.2010, vide which her evidence was closed by the trial court by order. A perusal of the order itself shows that in all 17 opportunities were granted to the plaintiff to produce her evidence and it was only thereafter that the same was closed. As per the procedure laid down in the CPC, the plaintiff was entitled to three opportunities for producing her evidence and still the trial court granted 17 opportunities. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that some of the adjournments were granted on account of failure of the defendants to cross-examine the witnesses examined by the plaintiff. According to him, the number of those adjournments were four. Even if those four adjournments are excluded, still the plaintiff availed 13 CR No. 6957 of 2010 2 opportunities. When such is the position, no ground is made out for interference with the order so passed by the trial court. Revision petition is dismissed accordingly. October 26, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE