IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 5TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 12563 of 2010(U) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- THE AIYROOPPARA KSHEERA VYAVASAYA CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.T.120., CHANTHAVILA, KATTAYIKKONAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,AIYROOPPARA VILLAGE, CHANTHAVILA, KATTAYIKKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR(RR)., CIVIL STATION,KUDAPPANAKKUNNU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 12563 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, Co-operative Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act engaged in collection and supply of milk from its members submitted Ext.P2 series of applications and Ext. P3 series of applications for the purpose of availing a loan for constructing its office and for producing them to obtain sanction therefor. The said applications have been submitted for the purpose of getting Possession Certificate, location map and location certificate. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the receipt of Ext.P2 series of applications and Ext.P3 series of applications, no actions have been taken thereon by the second respondent. The property for which the aforementioned certificates is sought to be issued is under attachment. The contention of the petitioner is that the order of attachment cannot be an impediment for issuing the certificates requested for. Be that as it may, it is a fact that Exts.P2 and P3 series of applications have been submitted before the second respondent. So also, there cannot be any doubt that the second respondent is the competent authority to issue such certificates as WPC.12563/2010 : 2 : requested by the petitioner. In the said circumstances, the second respondent is bound to pass orders of the said applications and subject to the same to take further follow up steps . In the said circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider Exts.P2 and P3 series of applications in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge