IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 SA.No. 83 of 2001() ------------------- AS.79/1997 of DISTRICT COURT, KASARAGOD OS.99/1996 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANT(S)APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: -------------- RAMACHANDRAN S/O.SIDDANNA, RESIDING AT ASHOK NAGAR, KASARAGOD VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: --------------- K.SUNDARA, S/O.DASAN, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT THAI VALAPPU VEEDU, POST ALAMPADY, MUTTATHODY VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.K.G.GOURI SANKAR RAI THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- S.A.No.83 of 2001 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of February, 2010. JUDGMENT Second Appeal arose from judgment and decree of learned District Judge, Kasaragod in A.S.No.79 of 1997 which confirmed judgment and decree of learned Principal Munsiff, Kasaragod in O.S.No.99 of 1996. Dispute concerned right and possession of 62 cents in R.S.No. 325/part of Kudlu Village. 2. Now the parties have settled the dispute outside court and have filed I.A.No.510 of 2010. Terms of the settlement are set out in the application. Learned counsel on both sides request that in substitution of the judgment and decree of the courts below appeal may be disposed of in terms of compromise. Accordingly, compromise is accepted and recorded and a decree is passed in terms of the compromise in substitution of the decree of the court below. The compromise petition (I.A.No.510 of 2010) and the plan appended to it shall form part of the decree. No costs. C.M.P.No.390 of 2001 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks 2 Thomas P.Joseph, J. S.A.No.83 of 2001 JUDGMENT 25th February, 2010.