1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.6 of 2010 Vijay Joshi son of late Shri Shiva Prasad Joshi VERSUS Kailash Joshi son of late Shri Shiva Prasad Joshi & Another Date of Judgment :::: 18th January, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Satish Khandal, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The objection of the learned counsel for the petitioner is with regard to the power-of-attorney-holder executing the decree in the final decree proceedings for partition of the house on metes and bounds on behalf of the plaintiff-decree-holder. The learned Court below has considered the aforesaid objections and on the basis of the power-of-attorney and the `Vakalatnama' filed, has rejected the objection raised by the petitioner. 2 In the facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that the petitioner is in any way prejudice on account of the proceedings being carried-on, on behalf of the plaintiff by the power-of-attorney-holder, who has filed `Vakalatnama' also on behalf of the plaintiff. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, I find no reason to interfere in the revisional jurisdiction. Consequently, the revision petition and the stay application are dismissed. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/