IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1076 of 2008 SUNIL SINGH Versus SHEOJEE SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 30.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite parties. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order allowing amendment in the written statement in no way can be said to have been vitiated by any material irregularity, inasmuch as, the case of the defendant already pleaded in paragraph No. 12 of the written statement is only sought to be explained. This Court on careful perusal of the facts as originally stated in the paragraph No.3 read with paragraph No.5 of the plaint and its reply in the original written statement in paragraph No.12 is also satisfied that the proposed amendment in written statement also do not seek to displace of any admission on the part of the defendant which may cause any prejudice to the petitioner. In that view of the matter, this Court also does not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly this application being devoid of any merit, is dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)