hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2351 OF 2010 Oman International Bank S.A.O.G. ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Nitin Pradhanwith Mr. Rajeev K. Pandey and Ms. Shubhada Khot i/by M.S. Bodhanwala and Co. for Petitioner. Mr. D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 17TH AUGUST, 2010 P. C.: We have heard Mr. Pradhan learned counsel instructed by M/s. M.S. Bodhanwala & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Adsule, learned A.P.P. appears for the Respondent State of Maharashtra. With the help of Mr. Pradhan, we have gone through the report submitted by the Police Inspector, E.O.W. Unit No. 1, Crime Branch, Mumbai Police on 11.6.2010. We are satisfied, on the face of the allegations made by the Petitioner, that the Petitioner ought to be relegated to the remedy of filing a private complaint before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate with competent jurisdiction and we make it clear that as and when such complaint is filed the same will be considered on its own merits and without being influenced by the final opinion recorded by the Police Inspector EOW Unit No. 1. If the learned Metropolitan Magistrate is satisfied of directing enquiry under Section 156(3) of Cr. P.C. such direction will be issued against the E.O.W. Unit NO. 1, Mumbai Police. The petition stands disposed accordingly. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.)