IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.6205 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.10.2010 Ishwar Singh Dahiya. ....... Petitioner. Versus The State of Haryana and another. ....... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Shri Manish Soni, Advocate for Shri S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate for the petitioner. .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. The facts of the case reveal that the petitioner had challenged the notice by which it was proposed to impose 2% cut on his pension. The said notice was issued on 1.5.2007 and it was the immediate cause of action upon which the suit was initiated. Subsequent thereto, order dated 29.11.2007 came into existence by which the proposed cut was given effect to. Admittedly, the petitioner has not challenged that order. Therefore, the injunction which has the effect of staying the operation of the order dated 29.11.2007 which is not under challenge, cannot be granted in favour of the petitioner. No ground to interfere with the impugned order. Dismissed. October 08,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge