Ae LMTH^^ION'BLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASE No. ^M OF 2011 APPLICANT ........"•a^" i----1-^^l. ,Shn~JS;'- RESPONDENTS DEFENDANT No.2 Smt. Radhikabai W/o Lakhanlat Gupta, Aged about 38 years, R/o Behind Priyadarshini Nagar, Talapara, Tehsil and District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1. JanabAbdul Phateh, S/oAbdul Jabbar, Aged about 31 years, R/o Diprapara, Tehsil and District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh) Through . Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL No.183 OF 2003 ShflT. RADHIKABAI Vs. JANAB ABDUL PHATEH AND ANOTHER WHICH WAS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION VIDE ORDER DATED 25/09/2009 PASSED^YJ4PN'BLE^SINGLEBENChLOF THIS HON'BLE COURT. I r 1 ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. 236/2011 APPUCANT Smt. Radhikabai Versus RESPONDENTS Janab Abdul Phateh SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT :- &hri Ranbir Singh, Advocate, forthe applicant. •-.^rw crMJftT QF CHHATTISGXRHATJsILASPUR ORAL ORDER (29-4-2011) 1. Heard on application for condonation of delay in preferring the M.C.C. "•"-•-s-"-'-'nc'"TS .';i;;ab "buui Pii;i;ie!i 2. On due consideration, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. 3. This M.C.C. is preferred for restoration of First Appeal No. 183/2003 which was dismissed by this court vide order dated 25-9-20029 for want of proseuution. 4. The ground taken is that Shri Ranbir Singh filed his Vakalatnama in the case but his name was not appearing in the cause list on the date of hearing therefore, he could not appear. 5. On due consideration, the M.C.C. is aUowed. S.A.No. 183/2003 is restored to its original number. 6. List the matter after sunamer vacation. 7. Registry is directed to publish the name of Shri Ranbir Singh as counsel for the appellant in the cause list. ,-;i..?;^<\.^.'. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge