FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/6463/2010 In SA/587/2005 WITH CA/4056/2005 In SA/587/2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for applicant. Mr. N.J. Pahune-Patil, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 30th April, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Bajaj and Mr. Pahune-Patil. The statement not to execute the decree for possession made by Mr. Pahune- Patil to remain in force till 9th of June 2010. S.O. 7th of June 2010. 2. By Civil Application No. 6463/2010, the learned counsel for the appellant has sought to add two grounds in the appeal memo as substantial questions of law. As the appeal is already admitted and the questions will be required to be dealt with by both the sides to answer, no prejudice will be caused. The substantial questions of law as formulated by the appellant referred in para 2 of the application as question Nos. 3 and 4 be treated as the substantial questions of law between the parties. Application allowed. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL J. ] ssc/ca6463.10