— e. » tji 1 ^Ss% 'i *:\ .7 Isl ,^_ '^ H16H COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAniSOARH: BILASPUR SINeLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI JA8MSH BHALLA, Ag.CJ Writ PeBSon (Cl No. 3903 <rf 2007 PET1TIONERS 1. 2. 3. 4. Bhagwan Das, son of Lakhandas Vaishnav Krishna Das, son of Lakhandas Vaishnav Jeevan Das, son of Lakhandas Vaishnav Devdas, son of Lakhandas Vaishnav All resident of Village Bhumiya, P.H. No.1, R.I.C. Simga, Tahsll Simga, Dlstrict Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENT Sushila Bai, widow of Ramdas Vaishnav, ResidentofVillageRohra, PH. No.5, R.IC. Simga, Tahsil and District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Writ PeUtion under Articte 227 of the Constitution of India Present: Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. &ingeeta Midira, counsel forthe petitioners. ORALORDER (Passedon06'"Juty, 2(107) This writ petition arises out of oiders [assed by the Addttional Collector, Raipur and Board of Revenue, whereby after hearing the parties the matter has been remanded by both the quasi judicial authorities. However, petitioners being aggrieved on the ground of delay have approached this Court but they could not explatn the delay nor could substantiate their argument. However, the delay has been condoned and the order passed by the Courts below has been set aside. No other points were pressed. Since the matter has been remanded, learned counsel for the petitioners has the right to address the Court on tnerit In the light of above, no interfsrence is warranted in the impugned order under Artjcte 226 of the Constttution of India. ,»Accordlngly, the writ petttion te dismissed. __.___—__-—— Sd/- ActingChiefJustice L: