1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 15445 of 2008 Decided on: 22.6.2011 Anita Sood ….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Petitioner has assailed Annexure P-5, order dated 30th April, 2007, whereby she was placed under suspension. 2. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record copy of the office order dated 3rd January, 2008, whereby the suspension of the petitioner has been revoked and the period w.e.f. 30th April, 2007 has been treated as duty period. 3. In view of this, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed as 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No 2 having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. June 22, 2011 (hl)