®3§ “1 am via E gamuE "£-m ‘:i‘;il a53km aé IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s1No. g99‘? [2010(s3.) K / PETITIONER Ramnath Meshram, S/o Late Shri Nirbhay Ram Meshram, aged about 38 years, working ‘W“ ““9 as Peon, Caste- Mahar, R/o Village- Diyabati, Block Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through— Secretaly School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2/ Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Chief Executive 4. District Education Officer, urg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. :93“ ‘ 9 D EW,W.W SE: §€QNELE JUSEGE MR PRITW 0$-12-20'§9: 1e pe‘éitioner. Shri Ajif Singfi, PL for the S Grievance 0f the pet f Executive Officer, Janpand Penohayet, Gurut, aistt. Burg but ti i date his servtoes have not been reguiarized, iheugh, as per the Gavemmen‘t c§rcuiar, persans appeinted mi 1%? have been reguln r§zed. bmits that $he ends m’ juséma wouid Serve if tha direciian és iss Jed to the {espandent Ne. 4 for cansidering the ca3e of the petitie ‘er and t0 pass appropria’te order fer his reguiar§zatian Stafe ceun$el submita tha: gei§tionar has nc’z wed any document shewing the fact tha he had ever appraaehed the respondents for Seekrng his r KER BJWAKE& Shri B.Pa Singh. oounseé fart e/respondents, Csunse! fer the petitioner uEarizaron and, therefore, ihe' v pet§tioner eught to have first eepr ached the reeeondeni Nee 4 by bmits that ihe peetioner cannet i- tar<e l advantage of the circutar iss ed by the Government because I hts case does net fat! as per the oo dition of that circular. Aceordingty, the writ petition s disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a detaiied repr eentation before the respondent No. 4 within three weeks from th date of receipt ot oopy of this making representation. He further ttioner is that though he was §opotnteoi on 214.1996 as Peon by the Ch t ‘ e u e . u m ‘ . mo Em fame anew Wafe’a mmmm mama emit "3i feet thwart e ohmm WW WWR %arf?rqsn%31 I arder and in mm it is expected :rom the said authOmy to decide the same as expeditiousiy as possible preferabw wi‘zhin four monihs‘ !t is made ciear ihat this Court has n’Qt expressed am! opinien on merits sf the case and the autherity eoncemed wouédbe at iiberty \ ie decide the representa€i0n in absordance with iaw. / >Sd/- f Britinker Diwakek - ‘ Judge i Arr