$~1 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAILAPPLNs. 826/2011,827/2011,828/2011/829/2011,830/2011,831/2011 & 832/2011 (in FIR No. 78/2011 u/s 34/406/498A-IPC, PS Tilak Ngr) 1. BAIL APPL No.826/2011 AJIT SINGH Petitioner Througli : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with AS! Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant. 2. BAIL APPL No.827/2011 DALBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for connplainant. 3. BAIL APPL No.828/2011 SONIA Petitioner Through : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant. 4. BAIL APPL No.829/2011 JASWINDER KAUR Petitioner Through : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant. BAIL APPLNs 826-832/2011 PAGE 1 OF 4 > Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 5. BAIL APPL No.830/2011 BALJIT KAUR Petitioner Through : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APR for the State with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant. 6. BAIL APPL No.831/2011 DILBAGH SINGH Petitioner Through : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant. 7. BAIL APPL No.832/2011 SURJEETSINGH Petitioner Through : Mr. Niraj Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Rishali Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER ^ % 27.06.2011 CRL. M.A. Nos. 7146-7152/2011 (Exemption) The Exemption Applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. BAIL APPLNs 826-832/2011 PAGE 2 OF 4 BAIL APPLN 828/2011 BAIL APPLN 826/2011 BAIL APPLN 827/2011 BAIL APPLN 829/2011 BAIL APPLN 830/2011 BAIL APPLN 831/2011 BAIL APPLN 832/2011& CrI. M.A. No. 7199/2011(earlv hearing) 1. These Bail Applications are being disposed of by this common order. 2. As per the order dated 08.06.2011, the applicants have ^ brought ?2,00,000 in cash in the Court today. As per the directions contained in the order dated 08.06.2011, the said amount was ordered to be deposited in the name of Investigating Officer and interest to be given to the complainant/informant during the pendency of the trial. 3. The complainant who is present in person today in the Court states that the said amount be given to her, as she needs the money to get her daughter who is aged about 3 ¥2 years admitted in some school and for other expenses. 4. In the interest of justice and in view of the welfare of the girl % child, I modify the order dated 08.06.2011 that instead of depositing of the money in the name of 10, I direct that the amount of ^2,00,000 brought in cash by the applicants today be given to the complainant who is personally present today in Court and she is unidentified by the concerned 1.0. 5. The aforesaid amount is handed over to the complainant who is present in the court today. She has checked the amount and found the same to be of the correct amount. Since the applicants have complied with the order dated 08.06.2011, BAIL APPLNs 826-832/2011 PAGE 3 OF 4 therefore, all the applicants are admitted on anticipatory bail on their furnishing personal bonds in the sum of ^.25,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. 6. The Bail applications are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 7. Dasti, under the signature of Court. JUNE 27, 2011 j SURESH KAIT (VACATION JUDGE)