CMs No.1678-C, 6716-C, 6717-C, 7334-C of 2010 and R.S.A. No. 971 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CMs No.1678-C, 6716-C, 6717-C, 7334-C of 2010 and R.S.A. No. 971 of 2009 Date of decision: 07.07.2010 Jasvir Kaur @ Jasbir Kaur ....Appellant Versus Jaswinder Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL) CM No.1678-C of 2010 For the reasons stated in the application CM is allowed, order dated 3.2.2010 is recalled and the appeal is restored to its original number. R.S.A. No. 971 of 2009 and CMs No.6716-C, 6717-C, 7334-C of 2010 Parties to the lis have moved joint application under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, pleading therein that the parties have compromised the lis, and in pursuance to the compromise part of the covenant of the compromise has been implemented. The attested copy of the compromise is placed on file as mark 'A'. The factum of compromise is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondent, even otherwise joint application has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. CMs No.1678-C, 6716-C, 6717-C, 7334-C of 2010 and R.S.A. No. 971 of 2009 -2- Affidavits in support of the compromise have also been filed by both the parties. In view of the compromise having been arrived at, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent, this appeal is not pressed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Dismissed as not pressed. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge July 07, 2010 R.S.