IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22645 of 2010 AJEET KUMAR PANDEY @ BADE PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner along with several accused came at the roof of informant and shot one krishnanand Pandey dead. The informant was also sleeping there and she raised alarm but none came to the rescue of the aforesaid Krishnanand Pandey as well as informant. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner’s brother is adopted son of Radha Devi with whom there is land dispute and that is why the informant lodged this false case against the petitioner. His further contention is that in course of investigation witnesses falsify the version of the informant but learned P.P. referred some paragraphs of the case diary and submitted that not only informant but the daughter of the informant has also claimed to have seen the alleged occurrence and she has very clearly stated that it was the petitioner who committed the murder of the deceased. No doubt some co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the Bench of this court but in my view, the case of this petitioner stands on different footing and accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition stands rejected. It goes without saying that if petitioner seeks 2 regular bail that would be considered by the concerned court on its own merits without being prejudiced by this order. Shahid/Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)