1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3954/2009 Jaishree D/o Dinkarrao Deshmukh Age 33 years, Occ-Service-Assistant Teacher, Working at Zilla Parishad High School Zari, tq. & Dist.Parbhani R/o Zari, Tq. Dist.Parbhani. .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1] The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary to Government Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032. (Copy to be served to the Govt.Pleader of High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad). 2] The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad 3] The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. 4] The Education Officer (Pri) Zilla Parishad. 5] The Block Education Officer Panchayat Samiti, Parbhani. Dist.Parbhani. 6] The Head Master, 2 Zilla Parishad, High School,Zari Tq. & Dist.Parbhani. 7] The Block Education Officer Panchayat Samiti, Sonpeth, Dist.Parbhani. .. RESPONDENTS .... Dr.Shrikant K.Patil, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.K.Tambe,A.G.P. for Respondents 1 & 2. Shri Sanjay Mundhe,Adv.for Respondents 3 to 7. .... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. DATE : 27/04/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT [GANGAPURWALA,J.] : 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, Petition is taken up for final hearing. 2] By the present petition, the petitioner seeks cancellation of the deputation order dated 7/3/2009 issued by respondent no.5 and relieving letter dated 9/3/2009 issued by respondent no.6. 3] During the course of the hearing, the learned counsel for 3 respondents 3 to 7 has submitted that the proposal has already been forwarded to the respondent no.2 for its consideration. 4] In view of the fact that proposal has already been forwarded to respondent no.2, we do not deem it appropriate to pass any order in terms of prayer clause “C”. However, we direct respondent no.2, to decide the said proposal within a period of 2 weeks from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. Rule is made absolute in above terms with no order as to costs. 5] We grant liberty to the petitioner to agitate the relief as claimed in prayer clause “C”, in case the proposal is not considered favourably, in favour of petitioner. [S.V.GANGAPURWALA] [P.V.HARDAS] JUDGE JUDGE umg/wp2825-10