ua l ii!i IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (CGV WRIT PETITION (S) N0. (SSofi /2006 PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS .fa ^^ \0;...-^^ ^7>^y^^' i^x ..•••"' ..v:/ ..'l(\*>"" - 2. -^•>'.A>'^ /' '"• Nareschandra 'Patel, 'aged about 44 years, Government Assistant Teacher Primary School Chaarbhatha, Vikash Khand Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ?.% '^^ ^\^ 'r^y Director, Lokshikshan Sanchalnalay, Raipur, (C.G.) Evam 3. The District Education Officer, Education District Raigarh (CG) y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, '^^^^^^^^S^i^^^^^ XI-HC-78 3n^T?ir1^IR! gsiT3n^?Tst>i ul *ir»-r^ii ai*<i<b ?s?;qpIRPT, ®T{)<rt'ls,Ricti«y . W-^.C^^Oo. &&0&/66 ^200 31t^!(l t|dtb('^l(^°«,«T) stgRK dN'sn^r 11.12.; Shri A.N. Bhakta, tearned Shri ^ay Dwivedi, iearned Heard. (jounsel for the petitioner. '.L. for the State/respondents. thle Sin^h (Rsjkesh By this petition under Art|cl India, the petitioner seete a incremente and seniority on appointment in the light of the det Administrative Tribunal, 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra others)dated 31.1.2000 2. Learned counsel appearinfi copy of the order dated 9-11-3( PeUtion (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rsjkesh Chhattisgarh and others) and 1890/20)3 (ChhatUsgarh Shikch^k and others) and submfe that therefore, the similar order may b^ 3. The case of the petitioner i^ Teacher in the Schoot Education of two years with the fixed saiary) oftwo years' probation, the petitic|ner given the regular pay scaie from] Other similariy situated teacher^ Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay-lscale Artlcles 226Q27 of the Constitution of dire|ction to the respondents to pay the basis of the date of his initiai sision rendered by the teamed State Jabal(>ur in Original Appiicahon No. and others Vs. State of M.P. and •!bl'i|(d''fl-f WRTt'WfS^S <R]'K;I<. SR 3l1^IT 3f1^?T for the peBtioner placed on record J006 passed by this Court in Writ Kumar Sharma Vs. State of 4rder dated 6-4-2(X)5 in W.P. No. Sangh -v State of Chhattisgarh (he petitioner is similarty situated, passed. that he was appointed as Assistent pepartment on probation (w a period However, later on, after completion was regutarized but, he was not the date of his mitial appointment. r^ moved ttie State Administrat'ive i, wherein leamed Tnbunal vide P.T.O. .-•?. •'•""aste^ XI-HC-78 3Ti^rq;rR-fi<ti ci2n'3n^r*ii+ w ••^1 ^ '^ ^s NTqc11SSl11<h 3':c?^fpn?pT, »Tntt'i6,Rini^y ^.p.cs.3^. ^c W[ 200 ani^T qgw (ip^^") g^tiWHf^trsn^T repre$entatton order dated 31.1.2000 allowed tht representations to accord the sante situated, but, the respondents h|ave petition. 4. Learned counsel for the may be allowed to make a simiiar freatment to the petitioner sanctioned to other similarly situaf of the State Administrative Tribuny counsel for ihe respondents/Statel 5. Having heard tearned courfsel to the facts and clreumstances of the the limited prayer made by team^d to be reasonable. Therefore, th( representation within a period of No.1, raising all his grievances decide the said representation in of 30 days from the date of re|c< considering all Uie points raisec) account the order dated 31.1.2P00 Administrative Tribunal in 6. The writ petition is accord|ngly direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rules. =bi<(F<-f41-f 4iu<-iTfftetA'<Ri^K ^sif^irsti^r same. The petifioner made several treatment as he was atso similarly not paid any heed. Thus, this {(etitioner submits that the petitioner to respondent No.1 to gfve |and same pay-scale which has been ted teachere on account of the order dated 31.1.2000, to which leamed Ihasnoobjection. for the parties and having regard case, in the opinion ofthis Court, counsel for the peUfioner appears i|s petitioner is atiowed to make a l|wo weeks from today to respondent ^nd, in turn, respondent No.1 shall |an objective manner within a period efceipt of such representation, after by the petitjoner and taking into passed by the learned State iNo. 1452/1998. disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 21300 Original|Appiication P.T.O.