1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4670/2009 (Gajanan S. Kakde and others vs. Sou. Gondinbai M. Jamdhade) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 19, 2009. Heard Advocate Potbhare, for the petitioner. The suit dismissed in default has been restored on the same day by the trial Court. The contention of the petitioners/defendants is that the counsel who moved application for restoration did not possess Vakalatnama. The said counsel had filed memo of appearance. It is further argued that the instructing counsel had also no Vakalatnama. It is apparent that if the suit is restored without any instructions from the respondent/plaintiff, the respondent/plaintiff will not turn up before the trial Court and the suit will again be dismissed. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit.