IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6999 of 2010 CHANDRA BHUSHAN UPADHYAY @ CHANDRA BHUSHAN UPADHAYA @ CHANDRA BHUSHAN UPADHEYAY, SON OF JANARDAN UPADHYAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHAJPURA, P.S. BIKRAM, DISTRICT-PATNA. ………………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ------- 3. 15.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail of several years. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being the only bread earner of the family had gone outside the State to earn his livelihood after entrusting the case to his pairvikar but he could not be informed by him regarding the progress of the case. It is also submitted that the petitioner had surrendered in the court below on 29.7.2009. It is also contended that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of - 2 - the trial. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances, the petitioner, Chandra Bhushan Upadhyay @ Chandra Bhushan Upadhaya @ Chandra Bhushan Upadheyay, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri N.K. Thakur, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case No.114/1992, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the Government or Semi Government employee. Further, the petitioner shall remain present in the court below on each and every date during the course of the trial. If he fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)