IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2750 of 2009 1. RAJESH MAHTO @ RAJESH KUMAR MAHTO 2. BRAJESH KUMAR MAHTO 3. UMESH MAHTO ALL SONS OF RAMNATH MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- GORIYER, P.S.- TIKAPATTI, DISTRICT- PURNEA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28/02/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and State. The petitioners are full brothers and sons of the informant. They are accused of a case which has been registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 166, 167 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that land purchased by the informant was mutated on the basis of forged Panchnama in the Anchal Office. The informant had not put any signature on the Panchnama and despite that it has been done. It has been submitted that the allegation makes out a case of civil nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar Mahto, Brajesh Kumar Mahto and Umesh Mahto are directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 76 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)