- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMIINAL APPLICATION NO.2323/2010 The State of Maharashtra. ...Applicant.. (Org.complainant) Versus Umesh Damodar Kadam, age 20 yrs., occu.labour, r/o HADCO, Tuljapur Tq.Tuljapur Dist.Osmanabad. ...Respondent... (Org.accused) ..... Shri N.R. Shaikh, APP for applicant. Respondent served. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 07.10.2010 PER COURT : 1] This is an application filed by the applicant – State seeking grant of leave to file an appeal for challenging the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, - 2 - Osmanabad, dated 31.3.2010, in Sessions Case No.107/2009 acquitting the respondent – accused for offence punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code. 2] We have heard the learned APP for the applicant and we have perused the findings recorded by the trial Court. We have also perused the evidence of the prosecution witnesses from the record and proceedings, which have been called for by this Court. Upon such perusal, according to us, this is a fit case for granting leave. 3] Accordingly, this application is allowed and leave as prayed for is granted. Action u/s 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, be taken by the trial Court by issuing bailable warrant for Rs.10,000/- against the respondent – accused. (A.V. Potdar, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/cr710102