HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.1660 of 2011 Date: March 29, 2011 Between: Smt.Shamshunnisha Begum, W/o.Galeeb Masood, aged 36 years, Occ:housewife, R/o.Salala, Barkas, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad … Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and others … Respondents Order: Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents-police in not acting upon her representation dated 23-11-2010, in which she sought transfer of the case in Crime No.317 of 2010, pending on the file of Station House Officer, Chandrayanagutta Police Station, Hyderabad to the Central Crime Station or any other investigating agency, as arbitrary and illegal. Petitioner has filed a complaint before the fourth respondent alleging that on 24-10-2010 one Mr.Aqueel Khan and others armed with baseball sticks trespassed into their house and attacked her husband. Based on her complaint, a case was registered in Crime No.317 of 2010, for the offence under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, on the file of Chandrayanagutta Police Station. It appears, on the strength of the petitioner’s report and statement, section of law was altered from Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC to Sections 452, 363 and 307 read with Section 324 IPC. It appears, while the investigation was underway, husband of the petitioner succumbed to injuries on 27-10-2010 whereupon section of law was altered to Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. Petitioner seeks transfer of the crime in question on the ground that though there are several witnesses, only some of them are examined. It is to be noticed that investigation in the crime in question is not yet concluded and final report is not filed. Out of four accused, it appears, three have already been apprehended. It is represented by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that even A-4 was apprehended on 18-03-2011 and is remanded to judicial custody. Although the petitioner seeks relief on the ground that all the witnesses have not been examined, it is to be seen that investigation is underway and final report is yet to be filed. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the final report and has any objection, she can put forth such objection by way of protest petition before the Court concerned. But, at this stage, even before completion of investigation, she cannot seek transfer of the crime in question. As much as crime in question was registered on 24-10- 2010, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondents-police to complete investigation in the crime in question as expeditiously as possible preferably within six weeks from today and file a final report. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J March 29, 2011 N.B.Issue C.C. in 4 days B.O. MRR