IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5040 OF 2009 Chunilal Beheralal Makwana ..... ..... ...Petitioner V/s The Mun. Corpn. Of Gr. Bombay & Anr. ..... ..... .Respondents. Mr.Prasad Kulkarni i/by Mr.P.S.Dani, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.L.K.Tripathi, Adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 3rd December, 2009. PC: After recording of evidence when the matter was fixed for final arguments the present petitioner repeatedly sought adjournments and lastly filed an application for production of certain documents. The trial court has rejected the application by holding that no sufficient cause has been shown by the petitioner as to why documents were not produced earlier though in possession of the petitioner and hence proceeded to reject the application. As the matter has reached the last stage of the suit I do not propose to interfere with the impugned order. However it is made clear that in the event if suit is dismissed and the petitioner is required to file regular civil appeal it shall be open for the petitioner to raise challenges to the order impugned in the present petition. Thus without touching the merit of the matter and leaving all questions open writ petition stands dismissed. 30.12.2009.