IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1926 of 2009 BHUSHAN JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 1.7.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail, which was rejected vide order dated 27.6.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.23228 of 2008. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner with regard to the aforesaid offence. It is submitted that during investigation after the aforesaid order, no material has come against the petitioner implicating him in the case. It is further submitted that from the F.I.R., it would appear that the alleged offence had taken place on account of the property dispute between the family. The petitioner is a stranger and had nothing to do to such dispute. He happens to be a political man and as such he has been implicated. It is further - 2 - N.H./ submitted that the named accused, namely, Dr. Upendra Sharan Prasad Singh has been allowed bail vide order dated 18.8.2008 contained in Annexure-3. By order dated 6.5.2009, the diary in connection with the connected criminal case Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No.24 of 2008 was called for. The learned A.P.P. on going through the case diary is not in a position to indicate any material collected during investigation implicating the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely,Bhushan Jha, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No.24 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) - 3 -