IN THE HI6H COURT OF ^bICATURE AT 8ILASPUS, C^HATTIS^RH Writ Ps+ition No.«3~M2'^ "f 2006 PETHIONEP-: St. Paui's Eng«shHigher Secondary Schooi, Byron Bazacr, Raipur, Chhcttisgarh, through its Principa! V.A. Bsnnstt-, Son 07 Lats W.J. Bennett, Agsd about 37 years, R/o Raja Tdcb, Raipur, Tshsii Si &istriet; Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Versys - RESPON&ENTS: ^^-•^ ^v ..•""- '&:•••' ^<y'^ /'i8^/'1' ..••"' ,';s'a'<'cy.: ^^F" *.<v" 1. 9 ^ 3. S+nte sf Chhat+i.sgarh, Thrcuqh the Secretary, Oepdftment of Sehooi EdacaTjoR, ,¥>QnTraisv'a, D.iCS. Bhawwn, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ChhcTTIsgsrh Board of Secondary Education, 1+irough its Secretary, haying ite Office at Pension Budc, Raipur, Chhattisasf'h. Secretary, t'hhc+tisgarh Bocrd of Secondary Education, having its Office at Pension Bada, Raiour, Ckhctttisgarh, ?% i".^ •]Sw /e<- District Education Officer, Raipur, &istr!C+; Raipur, C.hhcttisoarh. ".'RZT PETTriON UNDSR ARTICLE 226 OF TME CONSTTTwTION OF WQ1A FOR ISSVANCE OF APPROPRLS.TE WRIT/WRrTS. .. IN THE NATURE OF MANbAMUS, •]^F]t*»*y^^»^^ift-y AMt^^-ft'^ 4lLl\' ^^<Tl-'f"!^ ^*< iT'T'^O! f *.^t9\'*H7t ^VK. 1 Tt/C i J.URAKJ, ANU/UK ANY U! MtK aUUABys^^SJLI Ur i.i.R.C NATJRE ^ *".. tioner Respondente ^y e i^A^'w oTisuoe St. Paul's English Higher Secondary School, Byron Bazaar; Raipur, Chhattisgarh, through its Principsi V.A. Benett, aged about 37 years, R,'o. Raja Taiab Raipur, Tehsi' & District, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Vereus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Education, Mantraiaya, DX.S.Bhawan, Ratpur, Chhattisgarh. 2) Chhattisgarh Board of Secondar)/ Educatlon, through its Secretary, having its Office at Pension Bada, Raipur, 3) Secretary, Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education, having its office at Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4) District Education Officer, Raipur, Di'strict Raipur, Chhaffisgarh. (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of Constitution of Indla) SB: Hon'bte Mr. S.atish K. Aflnihofr.', J. Prssent: Mr. Sourabh Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Genera,' for the State. ^-^wr P.aju (Passed on this 6 day of November, 2008) Learned counsel appsaring for the petitioner, on instructions, has become infruetuous, submte that wsth the passage of time, this petition and as such, nothing surviv&s in thls petition for adjudication, te which leamed counse! appearing for the respondents has no objection. 2) Accordingly, the petition is dismisssd as having become jnfructuous. Consequentty, M.(W.).P.No. 1836 of 2006: Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge