: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3677 of 1992 SUIT NO.3677 of 1992 SUIT NO.3677 of 1992 Central Bank of India .. Plaintiffs. Versus Taro V. Ramchandani & Anr. .. Defendants. Mr.A.V.Joshi for plaintiffs. Mr.N.K.Mudnaney for the defendant No.2. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 14th November, 2008. DATE : 14th November, 2008. DATE : 14th November, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Learned Advocate Mr.Joshi appearing for the plaintiffs states that the clients i.e. the plaintiffs have obtained no objection of the Advocates for the plaintiffs on the Vakalatnama. This goes to show that the plaintiffs wanted to engage new lawyer. Till today, no new lawyer has appeared and nobody from the bank has also appeared before the court. It seems that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit. 2. Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)