THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 5081 of 2010 Dated: 08.11.2010 Between: Sri Garapati Veera Raghavulu, West Godavari and another. ..... PETITIONERS AND Smt. Masina Veera Venkata Ratnam, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 5081 of 2010 ORDER: Revision petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.525 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Eluru. The suit is filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendant/respondent herein from interfering with the rights of the plaintiffs in the plaint schedule property, which is described as Ac.0.68 cents of wet land situated in R.S.NO.308/3 of Bhimadole village. They also filed I.A.No.3997 of 2008 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. seeking temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit schedule property. After hearing both the parties, the trial Court by order dated 07.11.2008 granted temporary injunction as prayed for. Aggrieved by the same, the defendant/respondent herein preferred C.M.A.No.70 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru. The said appeal was allowed by judgment dated 16.08.2010 thereby setting aside the order of temporary injunction dated 07.11.2008 passed by the trial Court. Challenging the same, the present revision petition has been filed by the plaintiffs. Having heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners/plaintiffs as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/defendant, I am of the opinion that the rival claims made by the parties with regard to possession requires consideration only after full-fledged trail in the main suit. In the meantime, it would be appropriate to direct that status quo shall be maintained by both parties as to the possession of the suit schedule property. Accordingly, the orders passed by the courts below are hereby modified and the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to maintain status quo obtaining as on today as to the possession of the suit schedule property till the disposal of the suit. There shall also be a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the main suit uninfluenced by any of the findings recorded and observations made by the Courts below, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 08.11.2010 Note: Issue C.C. in 3 days. B/o KLP