IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24605 of 2009 JAWAHAR GUPTA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, learned counsel for the informant. For Indira Awas and its payment, an account was necessary that was opened by the informant himself with an allegation that Rs. 2000/- was taken for opening the account. Another allegation is about obtaining of L.T.I. on blank paper but that has never been used. Last allegation regarding demand of Rs. 15000/- is false due to have other benefits for which informant was not entitled, otherwise demand is not fulfilled actually any payment is made after the allotment of the fund that also by B.D.O. by issuance of Cheque. Petitioner may be identifier only which has not been alleged. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Gamhariya P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhepura subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)