FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.454 OF 2007 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.455 OF 2007 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.456 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s of Judge’s orders Mr.S.M.Railkar, adv. for the Appellants. Mr.Umesh Mankapure, adv. for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Coram: J.H.Bhatia, J. Dated: 15th Oct., 2009 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel for the appellants seeks extention of time so that the decree may not be executed. It appears that the learned counsel for the respondents had made a statement that the they would not execute the decree for a further period of eight weeks from the date of the judgment, i.e., 31st August, 2009. The learned counsel for the appellants contends that he could not get the certified copy in spite 2 of having made the application immediately. The learned counsel concedes that for filing any appeal or SLP before the Supreme Court, even authenticated copy is sufficient. 2 In view of this statement, I see no justification to extend the time. (J.H.Bhatia, J.)