-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4905 OF 2004 Smt.Sarubai Pandurang Metkari & Ors....Petitioners Versus Shri Namdeo Ramchandra Metkari ....Respondent Mr.M.S. Lagu, for the Petitioners. Mr.S.N.Salunke, for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO J. F.I. REBELLO J. F.I. REBELLO J. DATE DATE DATE : : : 10th January, 2005 P.C.: . On 3rd October, 2000 at the instance of the predecessor of the petitioners in Writ Petition No.3091 of 2000 the order in favour of Respondent was set aside and the matter was remanded back for de novo consideration with liberty to the respondent to file an application for condonation of delay. That application was filed. The delay was condoned and the order came to be passed in favour of the respondent herein on 27th September, 2002. That is the subject matter of the present challenge. 2. Considering that the order was passed by the Inspector of Land Revenue, Sangli, the petitioners will have remedies under the Act. It is for them to consider that remedies. This would not be a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction at this stage. In the light of that Writ Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)