IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1218 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8402 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 5970 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1218 of 2011 ====================================================== Kitab Lal Ray, S/o Late Atwaru Roy, R/o Mohalla-Paharpur Police Chouki, P.S.-Phulwari, District-Patna. .... .... Appellant/ Petitioner Versus 1. The College of Commerce through Principal (M.U.) Kankarbagh, Patna. 2. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 3. The Principal, College of Commerce, Patna. 4. Magadh University through its Registrar, Bodh Gaya. 5. The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar Patna. 6. Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 7. The Financial Advisor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 8. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 9. Professor, R.N.Pandey (Bursar), Department of Economics, College of Commerce, Patna-20. 10. Professor Ramadhar Prasad, head of Department of Mathematics, Currently Member of Promotion Committee (Non-Teaching), College of Commerce, Kankarbagh, Patna. 11. Bhubaneshwar Dewedi, S/o Late Ram Prit Dewedi, at present Acting Head Clerk, College of Commerce, Kankarbagh, Patna-20. .... .... Respondents/Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra, Advocate. For the University : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 02-09-2011 This Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is preferred by the writ petitioner against the judgment and order dated 13th May 2011passed by the learned single Judge in above Patna High Court LPA No.1218 of 2011 (2) dt.02-09-2011 2 / 2 2 CWJC No. 8402 of 2011, 51 days beyond the period of limitation. We have heard the learned advocate for the appellant. We see no merit in this Appeal. For the aforesaid reason, the Appeal and the application are rejected. Sujit /- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)