C¥ WV Ky» ¢ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) g FIRST APPEAL Nd I 12 [2003 J APPEAL Uls 28 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 HE? gmmh ’ APPELLANT DR MOHAN LAL SAHARE x” ”APPLICANT / S/o BL Sahare Aged 37 years Vill. Bamhnidih, Tahsi! Champa, Dist. Janjgir—Champa (CG). Vs RESPONDENT : Smt. NUTAN SAHARE, NON-APPLICANT Age 25 years, W/o Dr. Mohan lal Sahare, Rlo Vin. Bamhnidih, Tahsil Champa, , Dist. Janjgir—Champa Present Add: Shashank Dabre, Tikrapara, Ambedkar Chowk, Near Buddhvihar, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (CG). XI—HC-78 .7. l. 9. . . .. 200 W mm (13W) 311%:1a ma? Wm? ma‘f§wWK awmW mat Hf%am a? 31%11 31W Lok Adalat Proceeding 07.10.2006 Appellant with Shri M.L.Pastore, Advocate. Respondent with Shri. Somnath Verma, Advocate. The matter is taken up in Lok Adalat and accordingly LOK ADALAT Chhattisgarh Hg; Court Campus, Bilasm Case No. RA. - 119/2003 Appellant: Dr. Mohanlal Sahara Vs. Respondent: Smt. Nutan Sahare ‘\ Appellant with Shn' M,L. Pastoxe, Advocate. Respondent with Shri Somnath Verma, Advocate. AWARD (Passed on 07.10.2006) In a Fixst Appeal, flled under Section 28 of the Hindu Maniage Act, 1955, both the parties tiled an application for listing the case before the Lok Adalat, making a prayer therein that during the pendency of the appeal, they have amicably settled the matter and divorce should be granted. to them by mutual consent. This applicah'on has been marked as I.A.No. 3268/ 2006, Today, the appellant namely— Dr. Mohan Lal Sahare and the respondent namely- Smt. Nutan Sahare, both are present. in person alongwith their counsel namely- Shri M.L.Pastore and Somnath Verma. They are duly identihed by their respective counsel. The contents of the application vide para 5 shows that the parties have entered into compromise and they have amicably settled that divorce should be granted to them and their marriage- tie should be dissolved. The brief facts are that the husband tiled a petition for divorce before the Court at Janjgir, which was dismissed. Against which, this First Appeal has been iiled and during the pendency of this First Appeal, the parties have entered into compromise as above. We also personally enquired from the parties about their compromise, to which they agree. We also tn‘ed for reconciliation, but the parties are not agreeable to it. D In the facts and. circumstances of the. case, we decm it proper to dispose of this matter on mutual compromise and to grant divorce to the parties on their mutual consent. The divorce prayed for, is granted on the mutual agreement] consent of the parties. The man‘iage solemnized between the parties stand dissolved by this award . .The matter stands dually disposed of. Sdl- ‘ , x Sunil Kumar Sinha r.Membernmk Sdl- rAdam/i '3 1 als'z/a x 5 w/ Judge ‘ \ Member - Lck Adam High Court BILASPUH of Chhanisgari} High Court BtLASPUR of Chhattisgam