1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4824 of 2008. [Kamleshkumar Jagatnarayan Bhajpai] v. [The Deputy Director of Edu., Nagpur and another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S. P. Palshikar, Advocate for petitioner. Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 17th NOVEMBER, 2008. We have heard Mr. Palshikar, the Learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petitioner himself is an Assistant Teacher for the last about 30 years, and he seeks to quash the approval granted to the appointment of one Shri S. B. Sakharwade who has been appointed as Shikshan Sevak by the Secretary of Shri Sriram Vidyalaya Devhadi. This petition, in the second round, does not implead Shri S. B. Sakharwade as well as the Secretary of Sriram Vidyalaya Devhadi, as the respondents, and admittedly, in no way, the petitioner's service conditions 2 are adversely affected by the appointment of Shri S. B. Sdakharwade, the candidate who has been appointed as the Shikshan Sevak. Under these circumstances, the petitioner has no locus to challenge the approval granted to the appointment of Shri Sakharwade. Even in the earlier Writ Petition No.1867 of 2008, same challenge was raised and this Court held that looking to the cause of action involved in the petition, the Court did not want to show any indulgence at that stage, and the petition was disposed off. However, this Court observed that the issues raised in the petition were kept open, and by relying upon the last sentence, the petitioner seems to have approached the Dy. Director of Education, and submitted a representation on 2-7-2008 raising the same issue regarding the approval granted to the appointment of Mr. Sakharwade. The prayer made in this petition is for directions to the Dy. Director of Education to decide the same representation dated 2-7-2008. As noted earlier, the petitioner has no locus standi to challenge the approval granted to the 3 appointment of Shri S. B. Sdakharwade as Shikshanm Sevak, and therefore, there is no case made out to entertain this petition. Same is hereby rejected summarily. JUDGE JUDGE //Muley//.