( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2021 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2021 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2021 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant. Versus Janardan Bhiva Koli .. Respondent. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for the applicant. Mr.Shirish Gupte i/b.Mr.Prakash Naik for the respondent. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 6th June, 2008. DATED : 6th June, 2008. DATED : 6th June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Mr.Saste for the applicant. Mr.Shirish Gupte i/b.Mr.Prakash Naik for the respondent. 2. By this application, order dated 17.3.2007 granting bail by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-I, Raigad-Alibag is sought to be challenged. 3. I have heard learned Advocates appearing on both the sides. The application for bail filed by the respondent was initially rejected by order dated 9.2.2007. Subsequently, this second bail application bearing No.237 of 2007 came to be filed on the ground of change of circumstance, namely, the applicant started suffering from Unstable Angina. The learned Trial Judge has considered this as a change of circumstance and I am not inclined to find fault with ( 2 ) him as certificate issued by Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital dated 27.2.2007 has been relied upon. Apart from this, I have enquired with the learned A.P.P. Mr.Saste as to what is the material appearing against the present respondent, learned A.P.P. Mr.Saste stated across the Bar that the only material appearing against the present respondent is a statement of a co-accused, who has stated that the present respondent had engaged him for commission of the offence and other related aspects but except this material, there is no other material appearing against the present respondent. The order granted by the learned Trial Judge cannot be faulted upon because no effective weightage can be given to the statement made by co-accused for the purpose of holding that a prima-facie case is made out against the respondent. In view of the above, the application for cancellation of the bail is required to be rejected. Hence the order :- a) Application is rejected. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)