1\C BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT&OF CJIHAmSG ^ ATBILASPUR felikon ^ ^ ^ CONTEMPT ^SSE (CIVIL) N0.^ 1 t' /2007 (ARISING OUT OF AN ORD-ER DATED 21.8.2007 PASSED IN FIRST APPEAL N0.'98/2007 BY THE DIVISION BENCH COMPRISING OP HON'BLE SHRI L.C.BHADOO,J AND HON'BLE SHRI S.K.SINHA, J) PETITIONER _g)i.°)-l-?-£ .<?~-7';'/^^ ^^^F^- »-a»d-'" , Ghansiram Lahare, S/o Shri Hagruram Lahare, Aged about 62 years - Through its Power of Attorney Holder -^'^amesh Kumar, S/o Ghansi Ram Lahare, Aged about 41 years, R/o Guru Ghasidas Chowk, Jodhapur, Dhamtari, Tahsil and District - Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENT (ALLEGED CONTEMPTNOR) Madhav Das Tandan, S/o Shri Bhaiyaram Tandan, Aged about 41 years, R/o Guru Ghasidas Chowk, Jodhapur, Dhamtari, Tahsil and District - Dhamtari (C.G.) CONTEMPT CASE (CIVILI UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 10 OF CONTEMPTS OF COURT ACT 1971 1 "3"^ •^ll'Mltrl-'l, riTTl'y'ld. rsldl^y •-') mcfr giii^ ?tf:;/Ko..-.^l%/(.' 'OT, 2JW Isre^r- 3n^[^i h-u* sn^i 'a^RNr'^i'a /'. sn^r ^<iiwglSti None tor the panies even in the .Ihere is aajustment or one counsei, wnicn is statea in tne cause w This contempt petition nas beenl of order dated 21/8/07. 1 ne case or tne petinonsr as p| dated 21/08/07, this uourt orderea t| transter or aiienate or create tnara varc^/ the next aate or neanng, wnicn was| respondent nas Torcetuiiy taKen ovest Detitioner receivea inrormation tnat tn^ thlrd person aoout vvnom, inTormauon asso averrea in tne petition tnat tne ref aiong witn otner persons ana nas put v that when the brother of the petitioneif respondent, not to disturb the propertyl In the repiy Tiiea Dy tne respoif contempt Detinon nave Deen specitica! respondent has not created any third |j) not violatea tne oraer OT tne uoun. Ml: maQe an attempt to torcioiy enter intol nas Deen nsea Derore ine unier juaiciali The order of this Court was resDondent No.1 shali not transfer or the propeiiy. ! nere v/as no oraer to pf< Isecona rouna. dounsel however tne names or otner p are not snown to De on aajustment. flled bv the petltioner aiieging viosation cftT^'^ll Wtfv^ ^ ^%t <Ri|-^l< ^T aifigii sii^i S, J. |eaded ln tne petition is tnat vae oraer iiat resDondent No.1 therein shall not )f interest in me property in question, til! dulv served on the responaent. i ne the possession of tne lana ana ine respondent has soia tne lana to some Is not availabie wjth the Detitloner. It is •pondent has come to petrtioners lans he fencing on the land. it is aiso statea arrived at the spot ana requestea tne newas aDusea. ident, the aiieaations contained in the ilv denied. it has been stated that the )artv interest over the suil lana ana nas case fe that on 16/09/02-,-the petitloner the suit iana. upon wnicn, a compiasnt Magistrate, Dhamtari. i'assed on 21/08/07 to the errect tnat eiisnate or create third party interest in -otect the possession of the petitioner. ! S^^flOT INh,, /<?s?E*«'te. ^":.dS» ^ ij, '<S!sSS!s'tg IXI-HC-22 V^A ':'^'"~! :'3-;SS:~" SD^t^T h-v'b SD^I ^wN^'^t?'^ Geepti "TEET'=:?IPIRIZ(, ddl'y'i'i.fai'ii'ay 31T^?T 'VRK A..-..)2.<Jt::...©.)A^'^^/^ "/" '""""""^ 200 fa'bttST' Hi»R'iTai*ira» sn^r'?(giW(if?g 3 in tne pefltion, it nas Deen v^ tnat tne responaem has soici tne 'ana sucn saie nave Deen given. i ne aiiegations ana nas caiegoncaity a propeny. in tnat vsew or me mauer, m\ initlating contempt proceedings is m^ tnererore aiscnargea. i ne petinon is •=til'4lM4ll HHClf'^'fi1^ <P»i^l< ^T aipgii an^i v^gueiv stated vvlthout any speclfic detail Ito some thira oerson. No aetails ot anv r^sponaent nas SDecmcaiiv aeniea sucn jverred that he has not aiienated the tne opinion or this i^ourt, no case for iQe out against tne responaent. Kuie is Rnally disposed off. Sd/- ManmdraMohanShrivastava Judge I'i-::;"-