IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9046 of 2011-E. Decided on: October 19, 2011. Nirmal Sharma. Versus The State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG & Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. AG for respondents No. 1 to 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a teacher appointed on PTA basis. She is aggrieved since the sixth respondent has been appointed in her place on regular basis. According to the petitioner, the sixth respondent can be accommodated, without any disturbance to her, in the nearby school, where there is vacancy. The petitioner may obtain the willingness of the sixth respondent and produce the same before the second respondent/competent authority, in which case, the second respondent/competent authority will take steps to accommodate the sixth respondent in the vacancy as pointed out by the petitioner, if available and in the resultant vacancy in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible and entitled, she may be engaged as PTA teacher, till she is replaced by a regular recruitee. The needful be done in three weeks. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 19, 2011. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (vs) Judge.