SS''-i-ff':KW'"K'°!'WS'SS HIGH COURT OFlBlHATl'ISGAIUI ATBILASPCR WIUT PETTTIONfSK No.2552 of20TO <i . PETITIONERS : 1. Beer Singh; Ghouhan, S/o Shri Makhan Singh Chcniiiaij; aged abmrt 30 Assistant Teacherl^it^^ SchdoT-:SuKaiinar, Block Balouda,I)istrK;t Jan|gir- CbatapafQ^^ . • ! ^.',; •.''' ^'"''' 1;':'.. 2. Dilchand .©ewanganShri Ramlakhan Dewangan," aged aBoa£ •52 -Assistarit Teacher, ©ovenimetit. Primarv ScKool—Dhadgabahia, Block Balouda, DistnctJatijgir-ciMunpa(C.O.) ' 3. LafcshiiKn^iPrasad Patel Shri Ramnafil Patel, aged ^^ , ^ about:51.,';Assist9nt Teacter, Goysrament Prinary y .School - Nawapara (B), Block Balouda, District Janjgii-cliampai(£'.G.) ! • . ^ J ' 4. Ram^hwar- Slrthore Sto Jairam Prasad Rafliore, a^ abouif-52^^Qoyiemmetit Model School, BIoek NawagaffL ©istt.Janjgir Champa (G.G.) 5. Bishnu Lal Dirghashkar S/o Jotram Dirghaskai; aged ;about 'SO yeai, Head Master Primary SehoOl; CBorbhatti^^Slodc Nawagarh District. Janjgir- ^ ^.'~'"".1. Chain]pa,j(e:G:);'-';; 1'- :! '' ;1 • ••,,-.•.' 6. Shiv Shaxi^rTiwari S/o Shahsblal Tiwari, ,aged; ; , about^53^^^ars,' Assistant Teacher Govemmeiif Prhnaiy-KSioKIiara, Block NawagaA DisEtt. Janjgir- _ :- Cbampai^.Q^ ^i:" . ....... ^•.1';.;, ,,"\ .::,J! .' ., 1-,.-:1-'\?'ER8E$^'- - -;. : - • "••: -• . RESPONDENTS : 1. State Sof:' Chhaftisgarh Through;- Secretary, D&gail|fflat; of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawa%|R,aipuT(C.G.)- . • ;;,?' 5' 2s£'I^-.'ENt8c^oEdu^^ OfiBcer,:: Qisteict: Janjgir- '-:-®iEU^>shffi.£r^^^^'.:l,,;_- , : ! .:::; 1 . i%UT PETniOSHNDERjyat3t;K22&©FTHEeONSTnrUTION OF INDIA 8B:;lIon'ble aiwSailsh K. A2idhotri,J. Present: ; Shnl>tasqj Mistera^.^Kocste fbrihe petitioner. Sm^LJ^Dwh^di, Depitty Gcweiim^^ OSALOROER . ..•.;1:-:',' , • . : ! . 1.:- . :1 . '1.' -—.,,'" (Passed^on;05taaa^of:May;2008^ . • : : . - Wrffa the consettt Qfthfeparttes,thematter is taken lip for hearmg fuially: ^ ^ 1. The petftioners were appoilffij^ ^Assistant Teachers on fixed pay aF Rs. 100A,AftercompIetion<«fi|^'ye^ofim)bationperiod,theyweregFaiited reeularpay scal&ofRs. 169-300fe • 2. Leariied counselappearing'fbr^llhepetitfoners submits that the issue mvolved in'fhecaseisastciwhetliefcths petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date imtial appomtment or after completion of probationperiod. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukanf Vadu atid 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the sinrilarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of iaitial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892W. The said petition w^ dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effeet thatthe Teachers/Assistaat Teacliers are entitled to regular pay scale from date ofinitial appointment. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionere also submits tfaat this court, while considering Ifae same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006) by order dated ..09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representafion along with copy ofthe petition and annexures within a period often days, raising all their grievances and in tum the coneemed respondent was direGted to decide Ihe representatioa in an objective manner within a period of30 days fromthedate afreceipt oftherepresentation. 5. Accordingly, the petitibners are granted liberty to make-a represeiitation raising all their grievances and in tum the concemed respondent is directe4 to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its owa merit, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of reeeipt of - representation. 6. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposedof. No order asto eosts. ^.- ^' Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge K^'EU: Nii ;1 'Si 11 •-!"+;: "K' t 3''"M