IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2009 / 13TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 90 of 2009(H) ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31155/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: 1. KOLLANTEKANDY K.SUDHAKARAN S/O.KUNHIKELAPPAN, KEEZHARIYOOR AMSOM, NADUVATHUR DESOM. 2. KOLLANTEKANDY K.K.INDIRA, D/O.KELAN, KEEZHARIYOOR AMSOM, NADUVATHUR DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: MEPPAYYUR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, MEPPAYYUR, QUILANDY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.P. Balachandran, J. -------------------------- R.P.No.90 of 2009 in W.P.(C)No.31155 of 2008 -------------------------- ORDER Heard counsel for the petitioner and the standing counsel for the respondent. 2. It is vehemently disputed by the counsel for the respondent that the review sought for is not tenable as no argument was advanced at the time of disposal of the writ petition, advancing claim under the circulars produced as Exhibits P2 and P4 and further that the benefits conferred by those circulars have all expired, as the period has not been extended. Counsel for the petitioner asserts that period of the circular has been extended by a Government Order issued day before yesterday, though he could not produce the same. According to the counsel for the respondent/decree holder, those benefits are all extended only to agricultural debts and not for the debts incurred, availing of house building advances. RP 90/09 2 3. This Court is not concerned with all those aspects. If at all the petitioner is entitled to any benefit under any circular issued by the Government, he can claim it before the appropriate authorities either before the decree holder/Housing Society or before the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, who will issue appropriate directions to the Co-operative Housing Society, if at all the circular confers any benefit for the debt incurred by the petitioner. Petitioner is not entitled to any other relief in this review petition. In the result, I dispose of this review petition with the above observations. 2nd February, 2009 (K.P.Balachandran, Judge) tkv