-e •T;' ...••••". . ^s-^y^- ...^^::" .-••"".=^?<\ \1^-i""~ '^^a'\^-^'" »WvaL!i:.Sgfif^y r"^r ft^^ ••; --; :! ^^^Q -^:^^^ ^^...-•-'" ^-""" .*<'**' C^/ ^ i^ (2) INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NC^^'7^2006 PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS ^COP^ &^^T GLE^ti.t0^ ^TO •- c fe v^- -10 SmtJayaTiwari f^ W/o Shri Rajendra PrasadTiwari Age about39 years, Lecturer, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Chandkhuri, Block- Chandkhuri, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) R/o HIG-1/123, Main Road Borsi, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh ^ Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer •' Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- @ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTI56ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S^ No. 5635 of 2006 Petitjoner : Ateghanath Yadav Versus Respondents : Stute 6ovt. of Chhuttisgurh A oiwther W. P.fSlNo. 5636 of 2006 Petitioner : Scijodhar Prasad Sohu Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of CMwtMsgarh A ono'ther W. P.faNo. 5637 of 2006 Petitioner : Runiaahonker Supta Versus Respondenta : Statc 6ovt. of Chhartugarh A arwther W.P.(aNo.5638ofZ006 Petitioner ; Tcekam Lal Sinha Verais Reapondents : Stute6ovt.af ChhuttiagarhAawthcr Petitioner Respondents W. P. (a hto. 5639 of 2006 : Smt. Sunita Pal Versus : Stute 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A ono'thcr W. P./SlNo. 5640 of 2006 : AAahboob Khan Quraishi Petitioner : Veraus Respondents : StateStWt.ofChhattiagBrhAano'rt W. P.faNo. 5641 of 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Jcgeawnri Bha9el Weraus Reap<ndents ; StatBSovt.ofChhtrttisgarhAnno'thcr W. P.(S)No. 5642 of 2006 : Tulendra Kumnr Tiwuri Peti-Spner : Versus fteap^knts : State 6ovt. of Chhattiagcrh A anolher M W.P.(S)N(».S643«>f2006 Petitioner : Ramnvtar yadwa Wenus Respondents : Stet€6ovt.ofChhullidyuriiAan»1her PrHtioner Reaponden-te Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondcnts Petitioner Respondents Petitwner Reapondcnts PetitkNier Respondents Petitioner fteaporufcnts W. P. fS) No. 5644 of 2006 ; AnujftomSdhu Veraus : StuteSovt.ofChhattisgarhAano-rtwr W. P.YS)No. 5646 of 2006 ; Rcyendra Kunwr Supta Vcrsus : Stute6ovt.ofChhcttia9orhAano'ther W.P. (5)No. 5647 ofZ006 Sharad Tiwarj Versus : Stntc 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A uno-ther W.P.(aNo.5648of2006 : MBhendraPraaadShtikki Versus : State6ovt.ofChbottit9orhAdno1hw W. P.(S)No. 5673 of 2006 ; fiunbhooahan 5ohu Verajs ; StBrteSovt.ofChhattiagarhAono'riw W. P.fSlNo. 5674 of 2006 : 5mt. Jaya Tiwari Versus ; Stutefiwt.ofChhatMsyirhAano-ther W. P.fSiNo. 5675 of 2006 : Tuka Ram Chflndrukur Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattiagarh A arwther W.P.ffflNo. 5676 of 2006 : Ramcsh Kuiaar Verma Veraus : StateSovt.ofChhattisgnrhAano-ther And W.P. (5)No. 5677 ofa)06 ClhansnyPatel Versus State 6wt. af CWKrttiagarh A anolher ^ Siigto Bmich: tton'ble A»r.Justte Satiah K. Agnitiotri. Shri Ajoy 5hrivastam, Advocatc for Ihe Petitioners. Snt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. 6ovt. Advocote for •the reapondenta/State. ORDER (26th October. 2006) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for Ihe petitionws aubmits "that white Niorking as Asaistont TeachersA'pper Owision Teachers/Leehirers, •the petitioners hcw yne on tnunirg to iniprowtheir qualificotions on •then' twn expuues and acquired B. Ed^B.TJ &<aminortion Certificarte. 2. 'Tlw preaent twit petitions, bcirg WJ*.(S) Nos. 56M/2006, 5636/2006, 5637/2006, 5638/2006. 8639/2006. 5MO/2006. 5641/2006. 5642/2006. 5643/2006, 5M4/Z006. 5646/2006. 5647/2006. 5648/2006. 5673/2006,5674/2006, 5675/2006. 5676/2)06 and 5677/2006 involve amilur -fects and cwiimon qucstion of bw. Thus, -theae petitions are bein9 disposed of by •this common order. 3. According to lenmed counael f<r •thc petitioncrs, Ihe petitioners ore artitled to 1»w advnncB inerunents in VWM of •the decision of •this Courl' in •the cnae of Yaahtinnt IGumar HiandNny Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg ond anolher {2006 01) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in Ihe cose of Vaahtiunt Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporution. Our9 and uwltNtr ^. 4 (Supn>), oamc to •Hie conclusion •thart' Ihe teaehcrs. wiho hod obtained B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate on his o«wi expenses, are cowred by Ihe drcular duded 24.12.98 isuul by •the Stete Swemment of Madhya Pradeah. 4. Leamed counsel for Ihe petitwnera furthcr subnuts -^at the fccts and quBStkmof haif inwlved in •rt—preaent coals are squardy cownsd by deciswn of -this Cotrt in Ihe ccue of Yaahtiant Kumar BharadNny Vs. Afcjnicyal Corperation, Durg and onother (5upra), to Nihich leamed COUIWBI oppwiring for •rtw respondents faurly canoedes and agrcea iiwth the wnnent made by fasnrned counsel oppearing for •the pffKtioners. 5. Accordin9ly, •the writ pethioru are allwed in terms of •thc orcter passed in Ihe case of yaahNunt Kunnr UiarodNKy Vs. Municyal Corpwution, Dur9 and cno'ther (Supra), aubjwt to yerificution of •the foct as to »he'ther 1h» petitioneMi hwe acquired B. EoL/B.TJ. BtaminutiNi Cu^ificate on •their own expenaes or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of •this order be placwl on record of other oonnec'hKl writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Bablu