IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 963 of 2008 (M/S) Rishipal and another ....…. Petitioners Versus Commissioner, Garhwal Mandal, Pauri Camp Dehradun and others ....…. Respondents …….. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. My attention is invited to order dated 27.01.2008 passed by respondent no. 1, which shows that after taking cognizance of the revision, he had merely issued notice to the opposite parties therein without passing any ad interim order or issuing any ad interim stay. 3. Apparently, without any notice to the opposite parties in revision petition, on a subsequent application filed by respondents 4 to 12 herein (without serving copy of the stay application upon the petitioners herein), respondent no.1 passed ex-parte ad interim injunction order on 27.03.2008. 4. The petitioners are aggrieved of the passing of the ex parte ad interim order at their back. 5. Without adverting to any controversial aspects of the matter, I dispose of the petition by permitting the petitioners herein to file ‘Stay Vacation Application’ before respondent no. 1 after serving advance copy thereof to respondents 4 to 12 through their counsel appearing before respondent no. 1. 6. Respondent no. 1 is directed to dispose of the ‘Stay Vacation Application’ on its merits and in accordance with law within one week from the receipt thereof. 7. This Court has not gone into the merits of the case. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 11.06.2008 A