IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AX CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) N0. ^-\^_ ncl /2011 APPLICANTS (Petitioners) ^/)f??/' ;/^z ^^^/\ v.y^/^ ^ <v?te^ "**•. ^ 1. Manoj Kumar, son of Shri Chhat Ram Kanwar, aged 27 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Peon in S.T. Pre- Metric Sirls Ashram, Podi, Tahsil Podi, District:- Korba (C6) resident of Village Rahadi, Tahsil Pali. District:- Korba (C6). 2. Harish Kumar Jagat, son of Shri bev Singh, aged 26 years Occupation-Service, presently working as Peon in S.T. Pre- Metric (Sirls Ashram, Podi, Tahsil Podi, District:- Korba (C6) resident of Village Rahadi, Tahsil Pali, District:- Korba (C6). 3. Dinesh Kumar Kanwar, son of •i H. Narayan, aged 28 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Peon in Pre-Metric Girls Ashram, Tuman, Block Podi Uproda, Tahsil Podi, District:- Korba (C6) resident of Village Mohanpur, Tahsil Katghora, District:- Korba (C6). 4. Dwarika Prasad Markam, son of Shri C/5. Mar-kam, aged 33 ^- Vs CONTEMNORS years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Peon in S.T. Child Ashram, Sarboka, Block Podi-Upr-oda, Tahsil Podi, District:- Korba (CS) resident of Village Sela Navapara, Tahsil Pali, District:- Korba (C(5). <~ 1. Shri R.P.S. Tyagi, Collector (Tribal Development), Korba (C.6.) 2. Shri Lalit Shukla, Assistant Commissioner', Tribal Development, Korba (C6). 3. Shri B.R. Kurre, Block Education Officer, Block Podi- Uproda, Tahsil Podi, District:- Korba(C6). CONTEMPT PETITION UNOER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT ^ -'-'>2S~.KS^C;' XI-HG—78 ^WW (hHieh 75[ '<<i<iici<<, ytfl'y'iio, fsldl'yy,'!, ^'<7vA. Cei^f-Tt^)^»-W 1]1 Wl 200 SfI^F 'tRqi' (Tjclfg^f) 311^1 ^T R;-li+ ^STT 31T^T stt*lieh WtIIW flfet 311^1 1R.07-2Q11 Shri Maiay Shrivastava, cou This petition has been disobedience of order dated 7/2/2 <Dl<<iCT*iil ^HCll' ^f 'fe^ <P>i'(^.l< ^ 3TRIT 3II^!I Shrivastava. J. Insei for the petiiioners. filed by the pemioners alleaina WIIITUI 311 oassed in Vv.P.(S') No.706/11. Learned counsei for the pptitioners submits that aggrieved by non- payment of salary, the petitidners had approached this Court and considerinQ the letter dated 1 670^ Court directed the Collector to 1< petitioners vvere on employment they must be paid salarv for the v ^nd the work was taken bvthe authorities, torK performed by them. Leamea counset ror the peiltioner submlts that Dhe petitioners thereafter, made repeatea representations before the Btock but the same has not been releas^d til! date. At the first piace, this Court matter but the petitioners have which haye been placed on recc) Educatlon Officer. Thouah, in the petltion, it| Detitioners has been made to the! 1/2010 ofthe Assistant Commissioner, this ok Into the matter and ensure mat IT tne iducation Orfieer for releasinfl their salary had directed the Coiiector to iook into the not placed on record any representation which shows that they approacf^ed the Collector; All the representations rd, are re.DresentatJons made to the BIOCK has been stated that the representations were made before the contemlnors, none of the representation of the Coliector, w-ho has been directed to do the -fe, the petitioners should first approach the needfui In thelr cases. Thereforl ^ ..cr' 'ww XI-HG—78 3^ -^WIW^, '3XI\W\'a, fs|dl-Lllj,< . ^.fi-. CMt. €)uj0• ^l^ / 11 ^^.....^.^....................^........^^Q HW»1 g,^|q, ~ • • -^ Sf^l 'T??? (li°l(^»(<i'Et) s^v w R-<i<* /cTen ^n^r^i+iiqi i^eepii WITW ^lfet an^jT ^ Coiiector alona with copy of No.706/11 seekinfl compiiance of • In case, the order of this < wouid be at liberty to revive this disposed off. oilder c*ih^4li 'Rp^iftt* f^^ <Hii^.R ^siRwaD^B datgd 7/2/2011 passed in 'vV.P.(S) t'ne order of this Court. Court is not compiied wit ilsetition. The petitiQn is accordl the petitioner Ingly flnaliy Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 4-