1 Cri. Appln. 2535.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2535 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 501 OF 2009 Halimabi Gulabshaha Fakir ... Applicant V E R S U S Dr. Pharuk Anwar Shaha and others ... Respondents ... Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.G. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent-State. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATED : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2009 PER COURT 1] A communication initially sent by the petitioner came to be registered as Criminal Writ Petition no. 501 of 2009. This Court had appointed Shri R.M. Deshmukh as an amicus curiae. This Court by it's order dated 18.6.2009, had disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Superintendent of Police for deciding the application filed by the petitioner seeking the Police protection. It appears that the present Application has been filed in the disposed of writ 2 Cri. Appln. 2535.2009 petition contending that the Police protection has not been provided and the accused have not been arrested. It is also the grievance of the applicant that due to the assault made on her and her family members, she has sustained numerous damage and therefore, seeks compensation for the same from the accused as well as the Police officers. 2] An affidavit-in-reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State in which it is stated that the Police protection has been provided to the applicant round the clock. Two Constables are deputed in the morning and two Constables at night. It is also stated that the offence has been registered against the accused and some of them have been arrested while some of the accused are absconding. 3] In the light of the affidavit-in-reply submitted on behalf of the respondents, according to us, the proposed reliefs which the petitioner has prayed for in this Application stand granted. In sofar as the relief of compensation is 3 Cri. Appln. 2535.2009 concerned, the petitioner may resort to such remedies as are available to the petitioner in law for seeking damages/compensation. In that light of the matter, therefore, according to us, there is no merit in the present Application and the Application is dismissed. We however, quantify the fees payable to Shri R.M. Deshmukh learned counsel appointed on behalf of the applicant at Rs.3000/- (Rs. Three Thousand). Sd/- Sd/- (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) arp