( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 81 OF 2009 Sunita w/o. Shailesh Surwade .. Petitioner Versus Shailesh s/o. Eknath Surwade and anr. .. Respondents None present for the parties. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 05.08.2009 P.C. :- 1. No one is present for the parties. This Contempt Petition was received by post. It is say of the petitioner that in H.M.P. No. 6 of 2005, she was respondent. She made application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for interim maintenance and costs. The Court passed order directing payment of Rs.550/- per month as interim maintenance and Rs. 1000/- towards costs of the petition. However, in-spite of said order, the order is not obeyed. ( 2 ) Therefore, this contempt petition is filed for non-payment of the amount of the maintenance and costs. 2. As held in the case of Food Corporation of India V/s. Sukh Deo Prasad, (2009) 5 S.C.C.665, contempt jurisdiction cannot be used for enforcement of money decree or directions/orders for payment of money. The petitioner has her own remedies, if there is violation of order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/JUN09/cp81.09