IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1523 of 2008 MD. KAISHAR TAJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.3.2009 KHAN The instant revision application is directed against the order dated 19.4.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Munger, in Criminal Revision No.66 of 2008, whereby he has rejected the revision application filed against the order dated 23.2.2008, passed by the S.D.J.M., Munger. In the impugned order the learned revisional court observed that the case is still at the stage of investigation and as such it does not think appropriate to release the vehicle in question. It has been further observed in the impugned order that the vehicle in question was used in carrying arms inasmuch as five country made arms along with 50 cartridges were recovered. This revision application has to be dismissed on the ground that no second revision would be maintainable against the order passed in revision itself by the learned revisional court. Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. provides that an aggrieved person may file revision before a Sessions Court or the High Court in appropriate cases. The petitioner has already preferred revision before the Sessions Judge under section 397 Cr.P.C. and as such this revision application is not maintainable. It is accordingly dismissed. However, it would be open to the petitioner to agitate his grievances after framing of charge. (S.P.Singh,J) 2