IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1521 of 2007 1. TARNI PRASAD MEHTA, Son of late Kuldeo Mehta 2. Suresh Prasad Mehta, Son of late kuldeo Mehta 1 and 2 resident of Keori Tola Madhubani, Purnia Municipality, P.S. K. Hat, District Purnia 3. Sushila Devi, d/o late Kuldeo Mehta, w/o Sri Upendra Pd. Mehta, R/o village Jai Mangla, P.S. K. Nagar, District Purnia 4. Beena Devi, d/o late Kuldeo Mehta, w/o Sri Abhimanyu Pd. Mehta, R/o village Masuria, P.s. K. Nagar, District Purnia 5. Kaushalya Devi, d/o late Kuldeo Mehta, and wife of Sri Jagdish Pd. Mehta, R/o village Bisharia, P.S. Korha, District Katihar 6. Muldeo Mehta, S/o Dhaneshwar Mehta, R/o Paswan Toli, P.S. K. Hat, District Purnia ……. Petitioners Versus 1. INDIRA DEVI , D/o late Kusum Lal Tatma, W/o Sri Jalo Tatma, R/o Koiri Tola, Ward no. 1, Purnia Municipality, P.S. K.Hat, District Purnia 2. Kishun Paswan, Son of Gulbi Paswan, R/o Paswan Toli, Koiri Tola, Ward no. 1, Purnia Municipality, P.S. K.Hat, District Purnia 3. The State of Bihar, through the Collector, Purnia ….. Opposite Parties. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate . ----- 5 25.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits Title Suit No. 187 of 1994 has already been disposed of. This civil revision arises out from an order passed in the aforesaid suit. Thus, it is - 2 - submitted that this civil revision has become infructuous. In that view of the matter this civil revision is dismissed having become infructuous. However, this order would not come in way of the petitioners, if they desire to raise the question involved in this civil revision as ground in appeal, if preferred against the decree drawn in Title Suit No. 187 of 1994, if the same is permissible under law including Order XLIII Rule 1(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Spd/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)