IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R. S. A. No. 2762 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision : May 05, 2008 Balwant Singh and another ....Appellants versus Anokh Singh and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. GS Brar, Advocate for the appellant None for the respondents Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) This regular second appeal by plaintiffs is directed against judgment and decree dated 27.11.2002 passed by learned trial court whereby a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction, was partly decreed to the extent that they (appellants) shall not be dispossessed except in due course of law and the rest of the suit of the appellants in regard to declaration was dismissed. Thereafter appeal filed by the appellants was also dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 18.1.2005 passed by learned first appellate court. This is how feeling aggrieved, the appellants have come up in this appeal. The contention of learned counsel for the appellants is that courts below have erred while not granting the relief of declaring the appellants to be the owners of the suit land as the defendant-respondents had failed to get the suit land redeemed continuously for about 80 years. R. S. A. No. 2762 of 2005 (O&M) -2- This contention of learned counsel for the appellant is contrary to law laid down by this Court in a decision rendered by Full Bench in Ram Kishan and others vs. Sheo Ram and others, 2008 RCR (Civil) 334. In this view of the matter, no further substantial question of law is shown to have arisen in this appeal for consideration by this Court. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed at motion stage. ( Pritam Pal ) May 05, 2008 Judge 'dalbir'