IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1111 of 2010 Date of decision : 22.2.2010 Avnash Kaur etc. ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana etc. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners S. D. ANAND, J. The petition deserves allowance in limine. The reasons therefor are as under:- The compensation amount , in satisfaction of the award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, has been deposited. It is apparent from the impugned order itself that there is no stay order against the disbursement of that amount. It is further noticed in that very order that two petitioners, who were minors hitherto, have since attained majority. The appeal against the impugned award stands rejected by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in FAO No.1644 of 1994 decided on 3.9.2009. In that view of things, there was no justification for the learned Tribunal to direct that 50% of the amount shall be deposited in the name of the respondent- claimants in FDR. Money is, by all means, that of the respondents herein and they must get it particularly when the disbursement thereof is not impeded by any orders of the Court. Disposed of accordingly. February 22, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE