IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.608 OF 2005 Anandkumar Marimuttu Upanandan ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Vikas Shivarkar for Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. I see no reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the Trial Court in rejecting the Bail Application preferred by the Applicant, having regard to overwhelming evidence on record indicating complicity of the Applicant in the commission of the offence. Not a case for bail. Rejected. : 2 : 3. The Sessions Judge, Thane is, however, directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, if already not done, so as to ensure early disposal of the case. 4. The Trial Court shall keep in mind that the Applicant is already in jail for more than one year and five months. The trial shall, therefore, preferably be concluded by end of September 2005. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.