IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2009 / 14TH ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No. 4 of 2006() ----------------------- LAR.553/1998 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT(S)/ RESPONDENT: ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S)/ CLAIMANTS: ------------------------- 1. CHELLAMMA PILLAI, NARAKKATH VEETTIL KIZHAKKEPRAM. 2. OMANA PILLAI, NARAKKATH VEETTIL KIZHAKKEPRAM. 3. PRASAD, NARAKKATH VEETTIL KIZHAKKEPRAM. 4. VINOD, NARAKKATH VEETTIL KIZHAKKEPRAM. ( 1ST RESPONDENT CHELLAMMA PILLAI, NARAKKATH VEETTIL, KIZHAKKEPRAM, STRUCK OFF FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 8/3/2007 ON 1.A.359/2007) ADV. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY FOR R2-4 SRI.C.JAYACHANDRAN FOR R2-4 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.4 OF 2006 ------------------------ Dated this the 6thday of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We found by our order dated 1/10/2009 that the court below was justified in placing reliance on Ext.A1 judgment in L.A.R. No. 221/2000. The Registry now reports that L.A.A. No.1386/2005 preferred against Ext.A1 was dismissed by this court approving the enhancement granted in that judgment. This appeal, accordingly, will stand dismissed. No costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE dpk