Sinale Benell ^•/^ /z5-e>2^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 6 OF 2006 WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER r--" f ..- ^•••"' "••" RESPONDENTS ^s sr;?^ ^^^•^•^ '!^' '^. €J^1 Sanyasi Rarn Budek, S/o. late Shri' Janak Ram Budek , aged about 56 years, Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Saraipali R/o. SargipsS,' Tahsil Saraipali, <•"'"" District- Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Aeting ^ through Principal Secretary, School Education, Deparfment, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2) Mahender Singh Kashyap,. Principal, Girls Higher Secondary School, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WMT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS etc. XI-HC-78 3n^rwR-ii+ (raT31R?Tsh'41'sh ,-& J' 3ST ^fWM^, STTl'H'l'S, (Sldl'M^ SA. blfc J&6 tTffl^TTSh^lch ^200 gn^Tirag? (yil^si^ff) ?TtITWHf?(TaTT^T 30.8.2006 Mr. K.A. Ansari, Sr. Advo^ 1+ie petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, P.L. Hesrd. 8y this petition the petit dated 11.8.2006 (Annexure P-4) | ©overnmentAdarsh Higher Sec^ Higher Secondary School, Nar(|< ground. Learned Sr. Advocate fdi 2004 the State Sovernment ha^ 15 schoo!s, as per Annexure P-^3 1+iose schools, certain teachersl alsoone of those teachers, who Now by impugned order the peti in which CBSE course has transferrin9 i'he petitioner to a the training, which was imparts syliabus wiil not be utilized. In the circumstonces, leat submits that the petitioner may nctf A^p ^ +l'i)td'if1-< t|l^d)'fftecA<Rl<<;l< ^3Tf^IT3n^?T ^ate with Mr. 5. Imtiaz Ali, Advocate for for respondent No.l on advance copy. oner has challenged his transfer order whereby he has been transferred from >ndary 5choo!, Sarcipali to Governmsn't |aha, District Raipur on administrative r the petitioner submits in the year decided to introduce CBSE course in 11. In order to teach the students of were trained and the petitioner was \MS trained to tedch the CBSE sy!labus. Koner has been transferred to a school |ot been introduced, therefore, by ^chool where CBSE course is not there, fd to the pstitioner, regarding CBSE i^ned Sr. Advocate for the petitioner |?e aliowsd to bring this cmomaly to the ^ep 'P.Y'&'>e XI-HC-78 ^sq' "i)NitT«,®Tnu'ie,Ri<ii^y HTRCfT S»>*11W ^ 200 3n^?Tt|sld»(>jBitgsi^cT) w^r^iTR-ii* craTSn^TgRTTN? c- 'h- ??(tTW (rflff SI^iT z- co4e w|th ohd directed to decide the repre^ iearned counse! for the responde^nt Haying heard iearned cou^ to the facts and circumstonce^ opinion on the merit of the de+ailed representation aiong No.l rcasmg all this grievonces to decide •riie representation o'Jf within a period of 30 days from af-ter considering ali the points meantime, the petitioner shdl been relieved. With ths direction aforesdiid Consequently, AA.(W.)P. N4 Certified copy as per rule4 rtiised <t)I^Id<flT1 WMt' ^' te^ if^l'KK ^srf^Tsn^T ^entation of the petitioner, to which ^nts have no objection. i|isel for 1+ie parties ond having regard pf the case, wil+iout expressing ony :, the petitioner is allowed to make a cppy of this petition to respondent in turn, respondent No.l is directed [ Ths petitioner in accordance wi1ii law ;the date of receipt of representations by the petitioner. In tiie tiot be relieved, if he has not already lid, the petitiors stands disposed of. .3562/06 a!so stands disposed of. Sd/ r.^*»- P.T.O.