Civil Revision No.4122 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No.4122 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.7.2010 Om Parkash …Petitioner Versus Gurdip Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The respondent/landlord, who is a Non-Resident Indian, has filed petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, for eviction of the petitioner/tenant from the demised shop, wherein it was pleaded that he was having five shops and 350 square yards of the area on which he intended to run a business of car parking in the vicinity where the prospect of such business was tremendous. The Rent Controller, Ludhiana, found merit in the contention of the landlord and declined leave to appeal to the petitioner/tenant, vide order dated 24.4.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following submissions:- “A) The landlord is 80 years old Non Resident Indian. Therefore, he will not be able to manage the Civil Revision No.4122 of 2010 2 business of car parking. B) In the eviction petition, the landlord has submitted that after migrating to native place, to its roots, he also intended to reside in the premises. C) Lastly, it was nowhere stated in the eviction petition that the shops were to be demolished. After having given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, I am not persuaded to record a different note. The age is not a consideration for which the landlord can be non-suited for running his business. Furthermore, the Non Resident Indian, who has seen the business of car parking, abroad, may have his own vision how to carry out the same. The landlord is not required to furnish his plans of business to the tenant to show whether the same will be successful or not. Furthermore, as to where the residence will be provided, is also for the landlord to decide. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 19, 2010 “DK”