IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3547 of 2009 JYOTI SWARUP PRASAD @ JYOTI PD. Versus DR. SAROJ PRASAD & ORS. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shyam Sunder Pandey, Advocate. --------- 4. 13.1.2010. I.A. No.8477 of 2009. The explanation given in this Interlocutory Application is accepted. I.A. No.8478 of 2009. This application has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the M.J.C. No. 3547 of 2009. For the reasons, stated in this application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the M.J.C. No.3547 of 2009 is condoned. Now, I proceed to consider the application for restoration of Civil Revision No.1868 of 2006. On being satisfied with the reasons furnished in this application for restoration, the same is allowed and Civil Revision No.1868 of 2006 is restored to its original file and number. Let the Civil Revision No.1868 of 2006 be listed 2 under the heading ‘for admission’, if the same is defect free. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)