1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 847 OF 2009 Sou Urmila Ramesh Nidhan ..... Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 23rd March, 2009 P.C:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. An offence has been registered against the present applicant under sections 406, 420, 428, 467, 463, 464, 468, 471 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the said complaint that the applicant had obtained original sale deed and title documents from the complainant after giving hand-loan to the complainant and, thereafter, this sale deed was fabricated and the entire property was transferred in their name. Looking at the nature of 2 allegations which are made against the present applicant, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that there is delay of of 12 years in filing the complaint and that the documents have been seized and the investigation is almost over. It is submitted that the applicant is a woman and her custodial interrogation is not necessary. This submission cannot be accepted looking at the serious allegations which are made against the applicant. Application for anticipatory bail is therefore rejected. Seven days' time is given to the applicant to surrender before the concerned Magistrate. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)