IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1447 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Kunj Bihari S/o Late Sri T.R. Garg, R/o 6/266, Kalawati Colony, Haldwani, District Nainital. 2. Smt. Madhu Garg W/o Kunj Bihari, R/o 6/266 Kalawati Colony, Haldwani, District Nainital. …….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Senior Superintendent of Police, Nainital. 2. Member Secretary, Uttaranchal State Legal Services Authority, Dehradun. 3. Aadesh Kumar Goyal S/o Sri Jadoram, R/o Mohalla Chatta, P.S. Gangoh, Saharanpur. 4. S.S.P. Nainital. 5. Circle Officer, Haldwani, Nainital. ..…. Respondents Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1, 4 & 5. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Anurag Bisaria, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1, 4 & 5. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. S.K. Agarwal, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the writ petition, on account of the developments during the pendency of the writ petition, has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, CLMA No. 13854 of 2006 also stands dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 04.05.2007 04.05.2007 G