PETITIONER RESPONDENTS l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition. It is ordered. . Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Consequently, M(W)P No. 701/2002. application for interim direction, also w stands disposed of. Sahu @ Dr. Shiv Prasad Mishra, S/o Shri Budhilal Mishra, aged about 54 years, R/o Nirala Nagar, Near Bus Stand; Biiaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Local Self & Urhan Administration Department, DKS Bhawan; Raipur (CG). The Secretary, Public Works Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Coliectorr Bilaspur (CG) The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bilaspur (CG). The Tahsildar, Bilaspur (CG). Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Through the Commissioner. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J.) ”i’resent z Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. i Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawyer for the State. 1. #WG\U& ORAL ORDER l Sdl- Satish K. AgnihotrL Judge HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition'No. 1938 0f2002 (Passed on 4m {lay of November, 2908)