IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No.9559 of 2008. Date of decision: 21.2.2011 Sumita Vashisht …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P & anr. .... Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting ? No For the petitioner: Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the respondents: Sh.Vivek Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J.(Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 14th June, 2003 whereby the step up of pay granted to the petitioner vide Annexure A/4 has been withdrawn and her pay has been re-fixed at Rs.6400/-. It is not disputed before me that identical cases have been disposed of by a learned Single Judge of this Court and one of these cases is CWP(T) No.9564 of 2008 wherein after discussing the law, the learned Single Judge held as follows:- “Accordingly in view of the definitive law laid down by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2 the judgment cited above coupled with the fact that there is violation of the principles of natural justice, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-1 is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law and principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.” In view of the fact that the present case is also identical, the same is also disposed of and the order Annexure P/4 is quashed and set aside. However, liberty is reserved to the respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with the law and the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge in CWP(T) No.9564 of 2008. All the pending applications are disposed of. No order as to costs. February 21, 2011 (m) ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge 3