1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1075 OF 2008 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.895 OF 2008 Shri Chandrakant P. Shingade & Anr. ...Applicants/appellants. v. Walchand G. Bora ...Respondent. Mr.S.S.Kanetkar, adv. for the Applicants/appellants. Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni, adv. for the respondent. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 8th October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Appeal is filed by the original defendants against the attachment of certain properties before judgment pending the suit. The learned counsel for the applicants contend that though the loan was allegedly taken and cheques were issued by the respondent no.1 and the said cheques were dishonoured, properties is belonging to his wife defendant no.2 are attached under the impugned order. It is the contention of the plaintiff/respondent that the said property standing in the name of the wife was purchased by her husband from the money given by the plaintiff. Merely because property stands attached, applicants are not 2 seriously affected. In any case, in view of the reasons given by the learned counsel for the applicant, I do not see any reason to stay the order pending the final hearing of the appeal from order. 2 Therefore, application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)