IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.M.P No.9786 of 2008 IN W.P.No.7443 of 2008 Between: 1. G.N. Mani Ravinder, W/o. Gaddam Ravinder, 2. S. Venkat Ratnam, D/o. Late S. Venakateswarlu, 3. N. Kunthi Devi, W/o. N. Madhu, 4. P. Sarojini, D/o. Late P. Nagaraju, Petitioners (Petitioner in WP.No.7443 of 2008 on the file of High Court) AND 1. The Secretary to the Ministry of Communications, Department of Telecommunications, Sanchar Bhavan, 20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi - 100 001. 2. The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, B.S.N.L. Corporate Office, 102 B, Statesman House, 148, Barakhamba Road, New Dehi. 3 The Chief General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, A.P. Telecom Circle, Door Sanchar Bhavan, Nampally Station Road, Abids, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) (Respondents in -do-) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SANKA RAMAKRISHANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying the High Court to to suspend the operation of the impugned order Memo No. TA/RF/40- 5/05/Conf./29, dated 26-03-2008 duly restraining the respondetns from promoting the officials empanelled in the said order directing the respondents to maintan status quo as n date, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition pendingWP.NO.7443 of 2008 on the file of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon persuing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated______made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.SANKA RAMAKRISHANA RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner(s) and of Mr.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) , Advocate for the Respondent(s). The Court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be compiled with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). The Court made the following: ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. 2. 3. Form-NIC-IGS/WPMP{ }