IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19969 of 2010 KRISHNA SATH, S/o Murari Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 2(g)(h)(i), 10, 13, 14 and 5 of the Bihar Saw Mill (Regulation) Act. The prosecution case is that on 24.11.2007 51 logs of forest department were recovered in the saw mill named as Gautam Budha Plywood and Veneer Mill. Thereafter a prosecution report was filed on 03.05.2008 stating therein that on 21.12.2007 during inquiry about the recovery it was learnt that in fact the mill belongs to one Manohar Sharma but was being run by the present petitioner on rent. However, no source of the information has been disclosed in the prosecution report nor is there any documentary proof about the same. It has been submitted that the petitioner has no antecedent of similar nature of offence. In view of such, in the event of surrender of 2 the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Forest Case No. 34 of 2007, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case he fails to do so, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)