Crl. Misc. No. M-13286 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13286 of 2011 Date of Decision: 10.05.2011 Sukhpreet Singh and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in a case bearing FIR No.743 dated 22.10.2010 under Sections 420 and 406 IPC registered at Police Station City, Jind. District Jind. On 03.05.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners are not liable for any money which the complainant may have paid to the Rudraksh Overseas Solution.” Today, learned counsel has argued that complainant had earlier made a complaint against the petitioners and some other persons which is annexured as Annexure P-4 and the said complaint is found to be false by the police qua other five persons and as regards the petitioners, the complainant at that stage said that he would make a fresh complaint. Having gone through the allegations contained in that complaint Crl. Misc. No. M-13286 of 2011 -2- and in the present FIR , in my considered opinion, it would not be in the interest of justice to decline the prayer for anticipatory bail. It is consequently directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioners would be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) 10.05.2011 JUDGE manju