IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26915 of 2009 RAM YATAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUH VIGILANCE. ----------- 3/ 28.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Vigilance. Petitioner is in habit of filing successive anticipatory bail applications. For the first time his prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected in the year 1997, since then he is absconding, has not surrendered before the court below, and for no good reason has filed present anticipatory bail application. Petitioner is an accused in Vigilance P.S. Case No. 28/96. Allegation is with regard to defalcation of huge public money. I fail to understand why petitioner has not been arrested till date by the Investigating agency. Once his anticipatory bail was rejected in the year 1997, there was no order staying his arrest. This shows inaction on the part of the Vigilance Department and Investigating Agency. This is a question for consideration by the Director General of Police, Vigilance and the concerned Investigating Officer. Let the copy of this order be faxed to the Director General of Police, Vigilance, to inquire into the matter and take necessary action for petitioner’s arrest and also to take necessary action against the erring Investigating Officer, at the cost of the Court. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.) - 2 -