IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 31.01.2007 Coram:- The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.SATHASIVAM and The Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Appeal No.2345 of 2002 K.Baskaran ... Appellant / Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur. 2.The Tahsildar, Papanasam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents/ Respondent Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2000 made in WPMP No.11496 of 1999 in W.P.No.8110 of 1999 presented under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioners possession and enjoyment over the Natham poramboke property of an Extent of 0.03.5 ares in R.S.No.147/12 situate at 33, Ariyapuram Village Papanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District without due process of law. For Appellant : Mr.R.Vasudevan For respondents : Mrs.Bhavani Subbarayan, Government Advocate JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.SATHASIVAM, J.) The above writ appeal is filed against the order passed in WPMP No.11496 of 1999 in W.P.No.8110 of 1999 dated 27.04.2000. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly states that the main writ petition itself has been listed for final hearing and in view of the same, no adjudication is required in this writ appeal. 3. Recording the above statement and finding that no adjudication is required, the writ appeal is closed with liberty to the appellant/petitioner to urge all the points, which are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ raised in this appeal, before the learned single Judge. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. raa To 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur. 2.The Tahsildar, Papanasam, Thanjavur District. W.A.No.2345 of 2002 NG (CO) kk 5/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/