T' IN TOE HIGH COU8T OF 3UDICATUBE AT BIljNSPUR.CHmTI.SJSflRH, Case No.'a U»R»_ ^20 / 2002. Sri SHANKER UiL *G*BUSL S/0 late Sci Hoolchand Agarwal, (tged about 56 yaacs, R/0 Tikrapara»BU.a3p»< y EH su s 1. State Of ChhaUsgarh,reprs8Bnt8d by Chief Secretary, PETETIOIIIER Baipur - ChhaUsgarh.' 2;' CoUsctor, CoUaetoc Offiee, Bllaspur, CllhaUsgarh, 3«i SupriBtendent, ...^••^^^ ....•-•"".""h*^y:? - w'.c^"-^^.<n<^ ,-F^ y^' - .t,«V.?A<>1' ^^T^...--- da d ••"" Pbysloal Culture Society, Raja Baghuraj Siogh Stadiuii)] Link Road,BUaspur, Chhatlssarh< .RESPONDENTS ^a^ UIRIT PETETION yMD.EB ABTICLE_2260F THECONSTITUTIBN OF INDIA t> ^ HiGH COURT OF CMHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO. 420 OF 2002 Petitioner Shanker Lai Agarwai Versus Respondents . StateofChhattisgarh&Others WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE-226QFTHECQNSTITUTIONGFINDIA (SB:Hori'blfeMr.SatishK.Agnihotri,J.) Present:- Shri RamKuinarTiwari, AdvoGatelSr the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shndhar, PanelLawyer forthe State. Noneappears on behalf ofrespondent No.4 despite seryice •ofnotice.:1: :' :• . • : ": • : 1 ;! ' ^ -: '. QRDER1QRAU \(Passedon 28thdayofJuiy, 2010) •i " • . •:: ' • •••.':.'. • • ..'•• Challenge in this petitioh is to the order dated S/1 /20Q2, whereby a shop has been allotted to the petitioner subject to cerfain eonditiflnsasstateainthenotfee.AccQrdingtotliel^irnedcounset appearing for|ttie petitioneE, theterms and cpnditions as pybllst|»ed beforepurGhS^QfashoRoriaHction^heregisti^ioRampunt^^ mentioned a^ Rs.j 25,QQO/-.^Now, Ihis has been cMangediin^ noticedated 5/1/200% askingthepetitionertodeposffiasyn'iofjRs. 16,167/- as stamp paper and a ^um of Rs. 12,'138/- gs Ijtax depositing In] the Registrv.office. jThus, in total Rs.^^ ^ Accoraing-ts the learned counsel appearing for the petition^r|| contrary to the amount^ixed jn terms and conditions Qfallotragnl shopson auction. •:' .'. f ' :: Learned counsel appeanng fortRe||petitionerfurthersybin|s| the petitioneil ha^respondedto letter ;dated 5/172002 .ibijfe^er dated-'.Nil; toi.the |: Chair-persQn.^resROtldejnt.^ •Go]tectoB(;|6Ja^||r| is of •£1«» ].,^si'i«afe. i-1K.&.-"°~ ••£^tl,..':' |r:;B 9 i i! 1ashok .JJJlAtJ 2 There Is no endorsement on this letter and it also does not bears seai and signature to show that a copy ofthe application.ifany, made to tMe Chairman. 3. it cannot be held on the basis of lefter (Annexure P-5) that any reply has been madeand it does not diselose any endorsement astoacknowledgementofthesame. ^ 4. Be that as it may, ifno orderhas been passed and if thegrievance of the petitioner has not been complied by the Fhysical Culturai Society, Bilaspur, the.petitioner may make a fresh applicatipn to the respondent No.2& 3 pointing outthe difference in the first terms and conditions and subsequent terms and conditions as Annexure P-1.0n receipt of such application from the petitioner, the respondent authorities are directed to take appropriate steps in accordance with law at the eariiest within a period of 4weeks from y the date df reeeipt pf application ofthe petitioner. 5. With theaforesaid directionand obseryation the writ petition stanld disposed of. However, it is made clear that if the grievanceof tRe petitioner still survives, the petitjoner is at liberty to approach ttiis Court. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri