IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6845 of 2011 Decided on: 26.9.2011 Tilak Raj Verma …Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Transmission Corporation Limited and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has assailed his transfer from HPPTCL, Chamba to HPPTCL Division Rohru, Shimla vide office order dated 14.7.2011. 2. Mr. Vishwa Bhusha, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his client, submits that he is ready and willing to be repatriated to his parent department i.e. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. 3. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to repatriate the petitioner to his parent department i.e. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. Thereafter, the necessary posting orders shall be issued by the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd either at Chamba or at 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- Dalhousie, since he has not completed his normal tenure of three years . The needful shall be done by the respondents within a week. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 26, 2011 (K. Attri)