IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41252 of 2009 1. SANTOSH KUMAR RAJAK, SON OF SRI BINDESHWARI RAJAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SUDHARAN, POLICE STATION-KUSHESHWAR ASHTAN, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA. 2. RANJEET RAJAK, SON OF SRI JAGARNATH RAJAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- VISHANPUR, POLICE STATION-MAHISHI, DISTRICT-SAHARSA. …..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Parties. ----------- 03/ 22.01.2010 Heard Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioners are accused of the case, which has been registered under Sections 364/120B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner Santosh Kumar is full brother of the husband of the victim Sulekha Devi and the petitioner Ranjeet Rajak is maternal brother of the husband of the victim. Submission is that due to difference between the husband and wife. So, Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code is not attracted. Prayer for bail of the petitioners has been opposed by the learned Counsel for the informant who has submitted that the occurrence is true. Considering the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released from custody on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa/concerned court in connection with Maheshi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2009. kksinha/ ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)