IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2011 / 13TH POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 26 of 2001(G) ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.33454/2000 Dated 29/11/2000 .................... PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS IN THE O.P. ---------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):PETITIONERS IN THE O.P. --------------------------------------------------- 1. J.RAJENDRAKUMAR, SECRETARY,MALAYANKEEZH GRAMA PANCHAYAT, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT, PRESIDENT, KERALA PANCHAYAT EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNION, TRIVANDRUM. 2. P.A. ABOOBACKER, HEAD CLERK, VAZHAKKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ERNAKULAM, PRESIDENT, KERALA PANCHAYAT DEPARTMENTAL MINISTERIAL STAFF ASSOCIATION, TRIVANDRUM. ADVS. SRI.KRB.KAIMAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.ANIL K.NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.26 of 2001 in O.P. No. 33454 OF 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2011 O R D E R This review petition is filed by the State against the judgment dated 29.11.2000 of this court in O.P. No.33454/2000 which reads as follows: “The grievance of the petitioners is that Ext.P1 judgment is not taken note of while effecting promotion to the post of Head Clerks and higher posts. Accordingly, while effecting promotions to the respective categories, respondents 1 and 2 shall issue orders only in tune with Ext.P1 judgment. Original petition is closed.” The reasons stated is that, for implementation of Ext.P1 judgment it would require more time insofar as the seniority list has to be finalised in accordance with the directions therein. I am of opinion that, since the judgment is of the year 2000 and 10 years have already elapsed the reason given in the review petition would no longer survive. Accordingly the review petition is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/-