IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA G. APP. (DB) No.8 of 2011 THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU, BIHAR, PATNA. …….. Appellants. Versus 1. VIBHISHAN KUMAR MANDAL, Son of Sudhir Mandal. 2. Sudhir Mandal, Son of Santoshi Mahto, Both residents of village – Garaniya, P.S. and District – Banka. …….. Respondents. ----------- 03/ 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the Vigilance Investigation Bureau and perused the judgment under appeal whereby respondent nos. 1 and 2 have been acquitted of charge under Sections 420, 120(B) and 409 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. On careful perusal of discussions made in the impugned judgment whereby the public servant Raj Kumar Mahato has been convicted and the other two accused who are respondents herein have been acquitted, it appears that the acquittal is based upon proper consideration of the entire materials adduced against the respondents, which have been discussed carefully in paragraph nos. 23 and 24 of the impugned judgment. We do not find any good reason to admit this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Kundan (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.)