Civil Revision No.5158 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.5158 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: August 26, 2011 Amandeep Kaur .....Petitioner v. Dhanwant Kaur .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Ms.Monika Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside orders dated 30.7.2011 (Annexures P-1, P-2, and P-3) passed by learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Ludhiana, vide which opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses of respondent-plaintiff was denied to petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned orders passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- defendant that many opportunities were taken by respondent-plaintiff to produce herself and her witnesses for the purpose of cross-examination and however on one date, i.e., 30.7.2011 they appeared and counsel for petitioner-defendant was busy in other Court and however, the cross- examination was made nil by learned trial Court. Hence, it is contended that one opportunity be granted to petitioner-defendant to cross-examine the witnesses of the respondent. It has been further contended that suit has been Civil Revision No.5158 of 2011(O&M) -2- filed against petitioner by respondent for injunction restraining her from interfering in the possession over the house in dispute. It is further contended that dispute is between present petitioner and her husband and she is being harassed by her husband and mother-in-law. Hence, in view of these facts, one opportunity can be granted to the petitioner to cross-examine the witnesses of the respondent-plaintiff and the other party can be compensated by way of cost. Hence, the present revision petition is accepted. Impugned order is set aside. Learned trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to petitioner to cross-examine the witnesses of respondent-plaintiff subject to payment of ` 5,000/- as cost, which shall be a condition precedent. 26.8.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge