IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6495 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: May 12, 2011 Rajinder Singh .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ......RESPONDENT(S) AND CWP No. 5894 of 2006 Sumitra .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. This order shall dispose of two writ petitions namely CWP No. 6495 of 2006 entitled Rajinder Singh vs. State of Haryana and others and CWP No. 5894 of 2006 entitled Sumitra vs. State of Haryana and others, as common questions of fact and law are involved. 2. For reference to record, CWP No. 6495 of 2006 entitled Rajinder Singh vs. State of Haryana and others is being taken up. 3. This civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing letter Annexure P-1 dated 12.04.2006, vide which pay of the petitioner has been refixed and recovery has been effected from the salary of the petitioner. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the case is covered by judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court on 10.04.2008 in Om Parkash and others vs. State of Haryana and others, 2008 (3) SCT 310. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that indeed both the cases are covered by judgment rendered in Om Parkash's case (supra). 6. In view of the above, both the petitions are disposed of in terms of judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court on 10.04.2008 in Om Parkash and others vs. State of Haryana and others, 2008 (3) SCT 310. 12.05.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?