IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2008 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 5095 of 2008(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ THOMAS RAJAN ,AGED 53,S/O.K.J.THOMAS KALAPURAKKAL THAZHATHEL VEEDU, NEERIKADU P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CHIEF CONTROLLER OF PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES, CHENNAI-8. 2. PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES, SAFETY ORGANISATION,O/O.DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, 82, 3RD FLOOR KENDRIYA BHAVAN, OPP. LBE 2 KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM -37. 3. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM, CORPORATION LTD P.B.NO. 1601, ERNAKULAM NORTH, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER. 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER , PALA. 5. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE KOTTAYAM-1 6. GEOLOGIST, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 7. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHEIF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR FOR R3 SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR FOR R3 SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI FOR R3 SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS FOR R3 SRI.ANIL D. NAIR FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.5095 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges construction of a petrol bunk allegedly in violation of the rules. The petitioner has not, in the writ petition, stated as to what is the violation alleged in the matter. On the other hand, the 3 rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit to the effect that they have obtained an NOC and only in accordance with the NOC, preliminary work for establishment of the petrol bunk is being carried out. They further submit that the petitioner's property is not adjacent to the property in which the petrol bunk is to be established, contrary to what has been stated in the writ petition. In the absence of any materials made available by the petitioner to show that any rule has been violated by the respondents, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd