IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION No.44 of 2005 Islamuddin S/o Alimmudin R/o Mehuwala Shimla Road, P.S. Patel Nagar, Dehradun Tehsil & Distt. Dehradun … Revisionist Versus Principal Judge, Family Court Hardwar & another … Respondents Dated: July 28, 2008 Sri Parikshit Saini, ld. counsel for the revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, learned Addl. G.A. for the State/Respondent No.1 Sri Pramod Tewari, Adv. i/b of Sri A.K. Sharma, ld. counsel for Respondent No.2 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.01.2005 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Hardwar in Case No.305/2002, Smt. Hamita Vs. Islamuddin, whereby the learned Principal Judge, Family Court has allowed the application moved by Respondent No.2-Smt. Hamida u/s 125 Cr.P.C. and directed the revisionist-Islamuddin to pay Rs.2,000/- per month towards maintenance to Respondent No.2 from the date of application i.e. 30.7.2002. Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the revisionist stated at bar that he does not want to press his revision in view of the fact that the dispute between both the parties has amicably been settled outside the Court. Hence he prayed that the revision may be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the above statement given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as not pressed. Interim order dated 09.3.2005 passed by this Court stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) July 28, 2008 Rajeev Dang