1 wp1688.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 1688 of 2011 Smt. Muktabai Pundalik Khode & ors. ..Petitioners v/s. Shri Vadu Murlidhar Khode & ors. ..Respondents Mr. Nitin Mulye for the petitioners. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED :- MARCH 03, 2011. P.C. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 3rd May, 2010 vide which the application filed by the respondents for restoration of the suit which was dismissed in default, came to be allowed. 2. Shri Mulye, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that learned trial Court has allowed the application even though the respondent-plaintiff has failed to make out any sufficient cause for restoration of the petition and that too after such a long period. 2 wp1688.11.sxw 3. The learned Judge has given reasons in support of the order passed by him. Unless it is found that reasons are either perverse or impossible, it is not appropriate for this Court to interfere under extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. No perversity is noticed. Apart from that the order impugned is in the nature of permitting the parties to get their dispute resolved in accordance with law rather than forclosing the doors of justice on technical grounds. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)