IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8761 of 2004 PRABHASH MOHAN JHA S/O LATE SACHCHIDA NAND JHA, R/O VILLAGE P.O & P.S. GANGTI, DISTRICT- GODDA AT (JHARKHAND), PRESENTLY RESIDING IN Q.NO.- K-68, P.C. COLONY, HANUMAN NAGAR, KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT- PATNA, BIHAR ………….Petitioner Versus 1. KOSI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK, HEAD OFFICE SRI NAGAR HATA, KOSI COLONY, PURNEA PIN- 854301 (BIHAR) THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 2. THE CHAIRMAN CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY KOSI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK, SRI NAGAR HATA, KOSI COLONY, PURNEA. 3. RAMJIT SINGH, THE THEN GENERAL MANAGER CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER, K.K.G.B., PURNEA. (SENIOR MANAGER ESTABLISHMENT CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, ZPNAL OFFICE, PATNA 4. SRI N.K. SINHA, MEMBER DIRECTOR, K.K.G.B., PURNEA , CHAIRMAN ( FOR THIS AGENDA) ZONAL MANAGER (CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA) BLOCK-B, 2ND FLOOR, MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA ………Respondents ----------- 5. 29.06.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the liberty granted to him in C.W.J.C. No. 15734 of 2001 he has filed a fresh representation before the concerned authorities but the quantum of punishment has not been altered which is the subject matter of the instant writ petition. The only ground taken by the petitioner is that the punishment has been imposed without giving due weight to the fact that the petitioner has already deposited the amount said to have been misappropriated by him. On going through a copy of the earlier writ petition in C.W.J.C. No. 15734 of 2001 made available by the learned counsel for the petitioner and which is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. ) this court finds that specific ground no. (vi) was taken in that writ petition which reads as follows:- “For that the impugned order of dismissal is not commensurate with gravity of offence, particularly after admitted remittance of the deficit entire alleged amount immediately before commencing and hearing of the departmental proceeding”. In the above view of the matter, it transpires that this ground was available and duly taken in the earlier writ petition which has been withdrawn by the petitioner as appear from the order dated 4.9.2003 passed by this court in C.W.J.C. No. 15734 of 2001 (Annexure-1). In this view of the matter this court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.