t?' c ,J'\° c3l IN THEHIGH COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WMT PETITIOS N0. 13 i^ /2006 PETITIONER .••> ^..-•^y' ^-^^.'-•" ^- Dr. D.K. Patel, S/o. Late Dr. V.K. Patel, Aged about 36 years, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, I/c. Artificial Insemination Centre, Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ ,^^> ^•°'' /3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Veterinary), Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Director, Veterinary Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Raigarh (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTIpN QF INDIA FOR, ISSUANCE OF WRITJN THE NATUIffi OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI,_PROHIB!TION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. r y / X'..!1C-;2 3TI^?T'^T feiaisn^i gT"WHf?? ^q ^qrw-pi, 'g7fi?FT?-', t3?;n^i3;' 11MMI vfWieh 3ff^?r 5^1 .^."-^ , ^ 101,^1./• ^T^^t, \^^^ ^- ^^)0^ "^ 200 fg^T' W.P.No.1313/2006,1314/2006 &1315/2006 The petitionere were Committee vide order dated 21 various animals under the sp the weaker sections of the ^ •wifeffri•qroA'-? fy?> •ri^sre > -^ aiNn 3n^!i 3-4-2006 Shri • Manindra Shriv^stava, Sr. Advocate with Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the p+titionere. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. By this common order W.P.No.1313/2006, 1314/2006 & 1315/2006 shall be disposed of. Heard. ^ppointed as Members of the Technical M--2005 for vaccination and examination of feciai scheme for distribution of animals to jociety by the State of ChhatUsgarh. The petitioners' job was to check u() the medical fitness and matters related to the heatth of the animats. it W.P.No.1314/2006) submittec) submittsd his representation contended that whiie issuing! js contended that distribution job was not done by thepetitioners and th^itwas done by the other officials underthe supervisipn of Joint Director/ D|eputy Director. Snri Shrivastava, leatied senior counsei appearing for the petitioners, contended that Vt\e suspension order was passed on the ground that the peiitioners h^d committed iliegaiity and irregutarity in distriDution, butthat was not t^ejob ofthe petitioners and the suspension o;der is wholiy arbitrary. Le^rned counsei contended th^t Dr. S.K.S. Gahamar (petitioner ;>i 'A'.P.I\|o.1"313/2006) submitted his representetior. on 8-2-2006 as per Anne<<ure-P/9, Dr. D.K. Patei (petitloner in his representation on 8-2-2006 asper Annexure-P/9 & Dr. B.L. (pupta (petitioner in W.P.No.1315/2006) |on 20-2-2006 as per Ar,rexure-P/:). It :', noticf? by this Court on 27-3-2006 thfe XI-HC-22 ai^r^ {^tR?OT§?I •ani'pflf?^ r..' ^ Gowri ^«.<f ^' r/ •^^^wvpf, ^sTsnz, feray WHVti %t<l<* 3ff??['(I?q?,!.i i^iMJ.i ^ 13>^)o& "u^? " jo^ n^je^ ra?""'""-""""""""""/"'"^ 200 ' fa^g' sn^TCnwBfta -2-- •wfeq^t[pTCif-^ •fs^zttRire^ ^artigiisil^a respondents were directed to]submit the reply by 3-4-2006 and in the meantime it was also directed to decide the representation of frie petitioners. It is pointed out that neither the repiy has been filed nor representation has been decid^d bythe respondent authorities. On the other hand, Shrj Dubey, learned counsel appearingfor the State, contended that if the rejpresentations submitted 'by the petitioners are not decided the same will t(i Having considered an<j e decided within a period of ten days. without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opi|nion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if a direction is given t<^ within a period of five days| competent authorjty and on underth6iaw. With the aforesaid obs No.1313/2006,1314^2006 & 1: the petitioners to make statutory appeats from the date of th'is order before the such statutory appeai being fiied, the competent authorjty shaii d^cide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as eariysfs possibie preferably within a period of ten days from the date of receipt <tf statutory appeat. tt is made ciear that if any grievance stijl remains, th^petitioners may avaii the remedy avaiiable ^rvations and directions the writ petitions (15/2006 stand disposed of. Consequentiy, pending ^Ppiications, if any, also stand disposed of. Copy of this order be itlaced on the r.ecord of writ pe'iitions No. 1313/2006,1314/'2006 & 1315/12006. Certified copy as per rul^s. Sd7- FaJdu-uddin Judge Copy to State counsei.