IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8188 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2770 OF 2009. Major T.S.P. Bevli ..... ..... ...Petitioner V/s Col. Krushna Kumar Sharma ..... ..... ...Respondent. Mr.R.V.Govilkar, Adv. for the petitioner. Col. Krushna Kumar Sharma -Respondent-in person. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 30th November, 2009. PC: This petition has been directed against an order dated 4.8.09 passed by the trial court directing the parties to argue the application at Ex.5 seeking temporary injunction filed under order 39 rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure. The objection of the petitioner is that Exs.35 and 36 are the applications objecting to the jurisdiction of the court and thus unless and until Exs.35 and 36 are decided the court ought not to hear the application at Ex.5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and the respondent appearing in person for some time, it is informed that all the parties are in agreement that the trial court be directed to decide all the three applications viz. Application at Ex.5 filed by the plaintiff and applications at Exs.35 and 36 filed by the defendants simultaneously after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. In view of the concession made available by the petitioner and the respondents I dispose of present writ petition by directing the trial court to hear and decide application at Ex.5 and Applications at Exs.35 and 36 at the same time, pending on its file as 1 expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four weeks from today after affording an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. It is made clear that parties be heard touching all three applications and said applications be disposed of. Writ petition stands disposed of. In view of disposal of writ petition civil application No.2770/09 does not survive and the same also stands disposed of. 30.11.2009. 2