IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17758 of 2008 Between: V.Venkat Swamy S/o.Late V.Mallesh R/o.5-101, Tapral village Malkajgiri Mandal, R.R.District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman,HUDA,Hyderabad 2 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner, Hyderabad 3 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Deputy Commissioner, Malkajgiri Zone, Hyderabad 4 The Tahsildar, Malkajgiri Mandal, R.R.District at Malkajgiri 5 P.B.Maru s/o.Bhagwan Maru R/o.H.No.18-9-86/2,Chandrayanagutta Hyderabad 6 Smt.Leelavathi Maru S/o.P.Maru 7 Y.Chidambaram S/o.Late Bal Rajaiah R/o. H.No.18-9-86/.2,Chandrayanagutta Hyderabad 8 Y.Anasuya Wallabh Sunpar W/o.Late M.Soupar R/o. H.No.18-9-86/.2,Chandrayanagutta Hyderabad 9 Smt.Y.Sathamma W/o.Late V.Ramchander Rao R/o. H.No.18-9-86/.2,Chandrayanagutta Hyderabad 10 Smt.Usha Lal W/o.Late Capt.Dushyanth Lal R/o. H.No.18-9-86/.2,Chandrayanagutta Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 in not considering the representations of the petitioner dated 1.4.2008 ,25.4.2008 and 5.8.2008 as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles, 14,19(1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Nos.1 to 4 herein to see that no construction work takes place which alters the nature of land undertaken by Respondent Nos.5 to 10 or any one claiming through them over land in SY.No.154 and 155 admeasuring Ac.12.24 guntas and Ac.8.22 Guntas respectively situated at Yapral village, Malkajgiri Mandal, R.R.District and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon`ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VIJAY B.PAROPAKARI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.SURENDER RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner states that he submitted representations, dated 01.04.2008, 25.04.2008 and 05.08.2008, to respondents 1 to 4 alleging that respondents 5 to 10 are undertaking construction in an extent of about 21 acres of land in survey Nos.154 and 155 of Yapral Village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. He states that on rejection of his case under the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), by the Joint Collector, he filed W.P.No.6704 of 2008 before this Court, against the persons in whose favour the pattas were granted and even while the writ petition is pending, respondents 5 to 10 are undertaking construction. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent-Corporation. The petitioner is not vested with any right, as of now. The Joint Collector, Hyderabad, rejected his case, under the provisions of the Act. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed W.P.No.6704 of 2008 and the same is pending. When the petitioner is already pursuing the remedies in W.P.No.6704 of 2008, he cannot maintain a separate writ petition for ancillary relief. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to file necessary application in W.P.No.6704 of 2008. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ Dt.24.11.2008 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Note:Furnish C.C. in two days. (B/o) GJ