IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16869 of 2010 ARJUN MAHTO, Son of Sri Nageshwar Mahto, resident of Village- Kharsauli, P.S. Birpur, District-Begusarai........................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..........................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 27.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 26.02.2010 in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 380,307, 302 of the I.P.C. and Section 25(1-B)A of the Arms Act and Sections 3/5 of the Explosive Substances Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that initially the petitioner was not named but subsequently during investigation the petitioner’s name sprang up but the petitioner was not aware of his involvement in the present case hence he could not appear. It is further submitted that the case of some other co-accused has been committed to the court of sessions and which is pending vide Sessions Trial No. 103 of 2003 in the court of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-F.T.C.I, Begusarai. 2 It is further contended that other named accused persons, Ramjee Tanti, Upendra Yadav, Palton Tanti, Suresh Mahto, Ram Sharan Mahto, Rajo Mahton, Arjun Mahto, Budhan Sah and Ramesh Paswan have been granted bail. The computer report reflects as such. It is submitted that the case of the petitioner has still not been committed. Let the court below commit the case of the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner, Arjun Mahto, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 455 of 2000. If the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)