IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4705 of 2011 Punam Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 02. 26.7.2011 Either the Collector, Muzaffarpur has no control over his subordinates or the subordinates are so emboldened that they do not care for any direction which may be issued by him in official capacity. In any of the situation the Court does not feel very happy in the way the administration is being run at least in that district. The present petitioner was before the High Court in CWJC No. 18177 of 2008 challenging the appointment of one Veena Kumari, respondent No.7. The High Court disposed of the writ with a direction upon the District Magistrate to decide the issue after hearing the parties. That decision is supposed to have been rendered by the District Magistrate on 25.2.2010. He did find infirmity in the selection which was carried out for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sewika and therefore, directed that a fresh exercise be carried out within a month. Counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that it is more than a year and half now but follow-up action has not been taken by the respondents and illegally selected candidate continues to enjoy the fruits of the office. Writ is disposed of with a direction and liberty to the Collector to ensure that the process of selection is completed 2 within one month from the date of production of a copy of this order. He shall also fix the responsibility upon the persons who have been responsible for non-implementation of the decision rendered by him, if there has been no legal impediment created against the order dated 25.2.2010 passed by the Collector. Writ stands disposed of with above direction. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)