CRM-M No. 28286 of 2011 **** Harjit Singh alias Danna v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. D.S.Kahlon, Advocate for the petitioner. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 89 dated 25.04.2011, under Sections 399, 402, 379, 411, 414 IPC registered at Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar. Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is a juvenile, however, I find that this point was not considered in the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar. Learned counsel has stated that that may have been because the birth certificate Annexure P-1 was made available to the petitioner after the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge. In my opinion it would be appropriate if the present petition is not entertained and liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a fresh application before the competent Court bringing out the averment that the petitioner is a juvenile. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE September 16, 2011 sunita