HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO F.C.A.NO. 305 OF 2011 Between: G. Kiran Singh @ Deepu ………….Appellant AND Smt. Rekha Rani W/o G. Kiran Singh ………….Respondents JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Family Court Appeal is filed against the Order and Decree dated 6.12.2010 passed in O.P.No. 403 of 2008 by the Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Appellant herein is the husband, who filed FCOP under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act against his wife, respondent herein for divorce on the ground of cruelty. The Court below dismissed the OP holding that the husband failed to establish the cruelty in any nature on the part of the wife. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the court below failed to consider the submissions made on behalf of the appellant in proper perspective and the actions of the respondent-wife in filing criminal cases one after the other against the appellant and his family members amounts to cruelty. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and also perused judgment passed by the Court below and the evidence on record. It is on record that immediately 15 days after the marriage, the appellant and his family members began to harass the respondent demanding additional dowry. On 2.3.2006 the appellant and his family members caught hold of the respondent-wife and pumped the hit spray in her mouth and nostrils and consequently she fell unconscious. Suppressing all these facts, the appellant has twisted the case as if she inhaled the hit spray as an attempt to commit suicide. Therefore, the court below categorically observed that the statements made by the appellant appears to be a concocted stories and no complaint was lodged either by the appellant or his parents that the parents of the respondent or their followers beat the mother of appellant on 2.3.2006. In those circumstances, the court below held that the conduct of the appellant in deposing self contradictory statements shows that he wants to get rid of the wife on some pretext or the other. The medical reports, which were filed by the appellant, which could not be marked on behalf of the appellant, also strengthen the case of the respondent-wife. In such circumstances, the court below observed that the appellant-husband failed to establish the cruelty on the part of the respondent-wife and therefore, dismissed the OP, as he is not entitled to the decree of divorce. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we see no justifiable reasons to entertain this appeal so as to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J DATE: 28.12.2011 KA ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CD copies.