IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27801 of 2010 1. RAJBALI YADAV 2. BACHHI DEVI 3. SANGEETA DEVI 4. NAGINA YADAV ------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc.No. 28027 of 2010 SANJAY TIWARI @ NANKU TIWARI @ NANHAKU TIWARI --------------------- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 2 8.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Allegation is about killing the deceased for demand of dowry, causing torture for the same soon before the death within seven years of marriage in matrimonial house but petitioner namely Sanjay Tiwari @ Nanku Tiwari @ Nanhaku Tiwari of Cr.Misc.No. 28027 of 2010 is alleged for assisting disposal of the dead body by providing his Tractor to carry the dead body. So, the offence which constitutes does not justify refusal of his anticipatory bail. For petitioners of Cr.Misc.No. 27801 of 2010, it is said that petitioner no. 3 is married Nanad and petitioner no. 4 is husband of petitioner no.3, having no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband’s family 2 members, considering which their prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Participation of petitioner nos. 1 and 2 who are father-in-law and mother-in-law is also denied but has specifically been alleged for their participation. Hence, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 namely Sangeeta Devi and Nagina Yadav of Cr.Misc.No. 27801 of 2010 and petitioner namely Sanjay Tiwari @ Nanku Tiwari @ Nanhaku Tiwari of Cr.Misc.No. 28027 of 2010 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah in Jogapatti P.S. Case No. 210/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)