IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6587 OF 2009 Kashinath s/o Limbaji Sathe & anr. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS Raosaheb s/o Kishanrao Akat and others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri A.S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for petitioner Shri P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel, holding for Shri Amol Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No.1. ..... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 29th September, 2010. PER COURT: 1. Heard. In an execution proceedings in Regular Darkhast No.15/1985, the Judgment Debtor has raised new plea about causing measurement of the property for appointing Commissioner as the Decree Holder has allegedly encroached upon 20 ft. x 25 ft. area of House No.196. The learned Judge has correctly dealt with the situation while rejecting the application in paragraph No.6 of the order. The decree under challenge was certainly with a confined and demarcated area of 39 ft. x 27 ft. in Regular Civil Suit No.35/1980. No interference is warranted. Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/wp658709