IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 7TH ASWINA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 28885 of 2008(L) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JOSE.T.L., AGED 40, S/O.LONAPPAN THUDIYAN HOUSE, KUTTICHIRA VILLAGE, KORMALA DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SECRETARY KODASSERY GRAMA PANVCHAYAT, CHATTIKULAM POST, THRISSUR. 3. DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, O/O. OF THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICE, THRISSUR BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 28885 OF 2008 - L = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of September 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is regarding the delay on the part of the 2nd respondent Panchayat in passing orders on his application for renewal of Ext. P3 licence. It is stated that Ext. P5 is the application he has made for renewal of the licence. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, renewal has been applied for by Ext. P5 and orders have not been passed by the 2nd respondent so far, orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Writ petition is disposed of as above. petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-