IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2011 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 9424 of 2011(C) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- LAILA RAJU, W/O. LATE K.M.RAJU, (INSPECTOR RETIRED ON 30.6.1998 FROM THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PALAKKAD UNIT), RESIDING AT A.B.HOUSE, POWER HOUSE WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.K.K.MANGALANANDAN, SRI. PRATHEUSH.M. ANAND. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 2. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR & CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 3. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER (PENSION), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 4. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, ALAPPUZHA – 685 002. R1 TO R4 BY SRI. V.V. NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, S.C, K.S.R.T.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 9424 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner's husband who was a retiree from the service of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation died on 30.6.1998. This Writ Petition has been filed mainly with the prayer to command the respondents to sanction and disburse the balance amount of Commuted Value of Pension to the petitioner. In fact, raising all such grievances on the issue, the petitioner has already approached the first respondent through Ext.P2. Since Ext.P2 is still pending, I do not think it necessary to consider the contentions raised in this Writ Petition on merits, at this stage. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P2 is still pending before the first respondent and the first respondent is competent to look into the grievances raised by the petitioner thereunder, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2, in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3