1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 51 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2010 Shakti Sikandarlal Kapoor ... Appellant v/s Municipal Corpn. Of Gr. Bombay ... Respondent Mr.A.R.Pande for the appellant. Smt.K.K.Soraan for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 8TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appeal has been preferred contending that the Trial Court has committed an error by not granting any injunction pending the restoration of the suit filed by him. According to the learned advocate for the appellant, the notice of motion has now been placed on board for hearing on 1.4.2010. He further states that the Corporation has filed no reply as yet to the motion and, therefore, he apprehends that the motion would be adjourned yet again on 1.4.2010. 2 2. The Corporation shall file a reply to the notice of motion filed by the appellant for restoring his suit, within 10 days from today. In case the reply is filed, the Trial Court shall dispose of the motion on 1.4.2010 by considering the reply and rejoinder, if any, of the appellant. 3. In the event no reply is filed within the stipulated time, the Court shall proceed with the motion without the reply and dispose it of on 1.4.2010. 4. The appeal from order stands disposed of accordingly along with the civil application. 5. The status-quo as of today be maintained till the notice of motion is disposed of. ..... 3