IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46387 of 2008 MURARI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 17.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that Sanjay Rai has been shown in the F.I.R. as a witness, informed the incident to the informant but that can be only the interpretation of learned counsel for the petitioner. In the earlier part of the F.I.R. there is clear specific allegation regarding presence of the informant and watching of the incident. Sanjay Rai has been declared hostile even in course of trial most of the witnesses have been examined and turned hostile but the informant is yet to be examined. This may further go to show that the trial should be concluded soon. So taking into consideration the custody and the circumstances stated above since 11.5.2006 even the petitioner deserves no bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the trial court (Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Hajipur, Vaishali ) is directed to expedite the trial (S.T.no. 238/06 arising out of Raghopur P.S. case no. 87/2003). (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI