IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9771 of 2008 Decided on: 21.4.2011 Sher Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice counsel. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl, Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. D.P. Gupta, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the reply filed by the respondent-State, he does not press the present petition. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge April 21, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No