IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10055 of 2005 Between: Tota Annapurna, D/o. Venkateswara rao, R/o. Park Centre, Macherla, Guntur District. (The petitioner being a Minor, Rep. by her natural Guardian Mr. T. Venkateswar Rao S/o. Sitharamaiah) ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Convener, EAMCET -2005, Sit Building, Cellar Portion, JNT University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 2. The Regional Co-ordinator, EAMCET -2005, O/o. RVR & JC College of Engineering, 4th Lane, Brundavan Gardens, Guntur -6 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the Hall Ticket to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, against the principle of natural justice and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the EAMCET-2005 examination which is going to be held on 29-4-2005. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CHALLA.SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.RATHANGAPANI REDDY (STANDING COUNSEL FOR JNTU) The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not issuing the hall ticket to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to appear in the EAMCET – 2005 examination which is going to be held on 29.04.2005. 2. The petitioner states that she has submitted application bearing No.117943 to the 2nd respondent to appear EAMCET –2005. However, it is not in dispute that the application was sent by ordinary post and there is no material to show that the said application was received by the respondents. 3. In the circumstances, the writ of Mandamus as prayed for cannot be granted. However, in case the petitioner approaches the respondents and furnishes the number of the application form and other necessary details, the respondents are directed to verify whether such application has been received within the time prescribed and if it is found to be in order, the hall ticket shall be issued to the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G.ROHINI,J. Date: 27th April 2005. BSB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Convener, EAMCET -2005, Sit Building, Cellar Portion, JNT University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. 2. The Regional Co-ordinator, EAMCET -2005, O/o. RVR & JC College of Engineering, 4th Lane, Brundavan Gardens, Guntur -6 3. Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI} THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.10055 OF 2005 OPERATIVE PORTION OF THE ORDER: In the circumstances, the writ of Mandamus as prayed for cannot be granted. However, in case the petitioner approaches the respondents and furnishes the number of the application form and other necessary details, the respondents are directed to verify whether such application has been received within the time prescribed and if it is found to be in order, the hall ticket shall be issued to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ( Order follows..) ____________ G.ROHINI,J. Date: 27.04.2005. Note: 1.Issue operative portion of the Order by wire at party’s costs. 2. Please send the bundle to the Court Masters’ section after Dispatch of the wire order. // B.O.// BSB