IN THE HON'BLE MIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0. c2-<3 OF 2004 APPLICANT CREDITOR Arun Kumar Agrawal S/o late Shri Binayak Prasad Agrawal, aged 73 years, resident of Purani Basti, Raipur, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS -^1] \ ^- .^•^^ ^s^^^ ^-•"f\ ^-•"0 ^ ^] ^ 5J- 6] 7> ^- 9] Nand Kumar pandey Advocate & reciver, aged 65 years, resident of Mahadeo Ghat Road Lakhe Nagar Raipur, Raipur [C.G.] RECEIVER Ramkishan Sharma son of Late Lachhchhiramji aged 67 years, Occupation-Business and landlord, R/o. Raipur, Tah. and Distt. Raipur. Krishnagopa Ladani aged 54 years, son of Radhika Prasad Dani Agrawal, R/o. Raipur, Purani Basti, Raipur [C.G.] ^p p L 1 C- fr-w^ Firm Jawarchand Thakarsi who do business jointly in Raipur, R/o Sadar Bazar, Ward Raipur, District and Tah. Raipur [C.G.] Jawarchand aged 55 years, son of Thakarsi Bhai, Merchant, R/o Raipur, Tah. and Distt. Raipur. Premchand aged 22 years S/o Suganchand Oswal Jain, Merchant, R/o Raipur, Tah. and Distt. Raipur. Smt. Mankunwar Bai aged 50 years, WidowofSuganchand, Shri Shrimal Oswal Jain Merchant and Sahukari, R/o Raipur, Tah. and Distt, Raipur. Amoiakchand Bhansali aged 67 years, son of Chandanmal, Merchant & Sahukari, R/o. Raipur Sadar Bazar, Ward Halwai Line, Tah. and Distt. Raipur. Ugrasen Jain, aged 70 years, S/o late Harmat Roy, Occupation Sahukari, R/o. Raipur, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] ^JtJ^ - ^y^^y^S' 1 13 II E & 10 l"n 10 IQ IQ |m I? fe 1'0 1 IBiIs m : . , .;....::;. „ XI-HC-22 sn^r^r R-ii*3n^T shHi<* yfefl ShHltl l'!»',-» padma -..;....- -j...... 3^ "qi-qKI-q, BTn«'IG, Rldltfy 3T1^?I ysicb »11<4MI SbHrai^.z:^::^°^ W[ 200 f^s ^ 311^1 «<lliSKHf?cT 18.07.2005 • Shri 1-IB Agrawat, Senio Shri CR Sohu,counsel f[ None for rest of the Learned counsel for th^ revision with liberty to take which learned courisel for^res^ Considered. Allowed. The revision is dismisseld Certified copy as per ri^ <t)wl<-f4)-) w^vSiv [^A <Ri«i< ^isri^iTsn^r (' Advocate, counsel for the applicant. |>r respondent No.l. re^sondents. i4 applicant prays for withdrawal of this appropriate remedy under the taw to ^ondent No.l has no objection. as with.drgwn with aforesaid liberty. lles. ' Sd/- J V.K.Shrivastava Judge y,