IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 13727 of 2009 Between: Smt. Nathi Padmamma, W/o. late Nathi Narsimha,Widow, R/o. D.No. 13-6-625, Karwansahu, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. byits principal Secretary, Department of Land Acquistiion, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The District Educational Officer, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot and handover the possession of equivalent extent of 600 square yards in the identified land in T.S.No. 41/P, Block-R, Ward No. 37 of Mallepalli Village in exchange of the 600 square yards of land along with its structures D.No. 13-5-301 belonging to the petitioner situated at Amlapur, Karwan Sahu, Hyderabad as expeditiously as possible and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The main grievance of the petitioner is that though she made a representation dated 15.6.2009 to the 3rd respondent-District Collector requesting to allot and handover possession of an extent of 600 square yards of identified vacant land in T.S.No.41/P, Block-R, Ward No.37 of Mallepalli village, Hyderabad District, in exchange of the same extent of land with structures at D.No.13-5-301 belonging to her situated at Amlapur, Karwan Sahu, Hyderabad, the 3rd respondent has not passed any orders thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and the learned Government Pleader for Education appearing for respondent No.2. Since the representation dated 15.06.2009 said to have been made by the petitioner, is pending consideration before the 3rd respondent, the learned counsel for both the parties have agreed to the disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: “The 3rd respondent-District Collector is directed to consider the representation dated 15.06.2009 said to have been made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law.” Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 10th July, 2009 bcj