IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.450 of 2010 1. Dolly Kumari W/O Sanjay Kumar R/O Saking Chandpura, P.S. Sondho, P.S. Garaul, Distt. Vaishali 2. Sabita Kumari W/O Mohan Lal Rai R/O Gram Amar Chatauni Mission, Compound, P.S. Palawa, Distt.- East Champaran …………… Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. District Magistrate, East Champaran 5. District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, East Champaran 6. District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran 7. Block Education Extension Officer, Mehsi, P.O. Mehsi, P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran 8. Block Development Officer, Mehsi, P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran 9. Block Education Officer, Mehsi, P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran 10.Mukhiya, Chaklaka Gram Panchayat, P.O. Mehsi, P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran 11.Panchayat Secretary, Chaklalu Gram Panchayat, P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran 12.Md.Moinuddin son of Shamsuddin, resident of Naya Tola (Samadpura), P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran 13Sunita Kumari, wife of Pramod Kumar, resident of Mehsi, P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran. ………………… Respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 13/12/2011 By the impugned order (Annexure-5) the Appellate Authority has considered the case of seven complainants and has disposed it of. Complaint of two petitioners was rejected on the ground that they had not produced any evidence of their appearance in the counselling. However, the Appellate 2 Authority granted fifteen days time to the petitioners to produce further evidence if they had, for further examination. Admittedly, petitioners did not produce further evidence for examination. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had in fact appeared in the counselling and had shown their papers but their signatures were obtained on a different register which has been suppressed by the Panchayat authorities. He also submits that large scale irregularities were committed in the process of appointment of Panchayat Teachers which shall be evident from Annexure-2, the selection list bearing signature of different authorities on different dates. If the petitioners have a grievance in respect of gross irregularities committed in the selection process, they can pursue it before the Appellate Authority. It is open to the Appellate Authority to consider the said grievance of the petitioners and examine the same by calling for the entire records. If the petitioners take steps in this regard before the Appellate Authority, 3 it shall make all endeavours to complete the enquiry and take a final decision preferably within three months thereafter. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)