f^ ....."-- ^.: J-- ^^s^s^--""' ^SS6iAeu"''\'o}..:.(.--"" 05 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G1 W.P.No. /<T?—/2006 ^^"^•^'^^ ? '"•• •'.-SW.S.". 'yssQEy ^iu^QQ ^'-'V-' ^'it^iiiiS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Kamal Singh Sidar S/o Late Shri Bhagat Ram Sidar. Aged about 26 years R/o Beladula Indira chowk . Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Vetenary 8s Animal Husbandry Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. (C.G.) 2. State of Prasdesh Madhya Through - ^ .^wsft^;^ Sfi^^VtS^1-- Secretary Vetenary 85 Animal Husbandry Department, Vallabha Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) 3. Collector Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 4. Deputy Director Vetenary 8s Animal Husbandry Department , Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Union of India Through - Director , personnel training ; public grievance 8s Pension ( State Reorganisation Cell) 06 Loknayak Bhavan , Khan Market New Dehli. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The above named petitioner most humble and respectfully begs to submit as under : j|r>jLT»*n'»^*TJ"r a wa-^^-n^-wiww w*i El• BT XI-HC-22 ^sr •^ll^lcl<l, t»fl!yis,["I'ni'My 311^1 ^BT K-u* sf^ shHi<^ ^t^ Gowri ' ^v y •V ^f '^y/-.<'. v/^' :1^/9 *<WII «KWK sfl^TTOiiwg^r 24-1-2006 On a mention being made, ths Shri Dhani Ram Patel,couns« Shri S.P. Ka!e,Govt. Advocata Miss Sharmila Singhai, Standi Heard. This case reiates to compas; the death ofan employee serving in Learned counsel for ,the pe death of the employee occurredon eartier. It is further submitted th< No.1322/2002 involvihg the same this Court on 20/12/2005. He pray^ this case aiso. Learned counsel for the Statf states that the State of Ghhattisgarll cases of dependants of those empl strictly in accordance with the poli^ submits that four months time fd glven. In view of the submissions nl the parties, without expressing any| the opinion of this Court, ends of given to the State of Chhattisga'j consider and decide the case of policy prevalent at the time of dea| petitioner found eligible, appointm^ possible preferabSy on or before 3|' directed to render due co-operation| if any grievance still remains, the p4 under the law including filing of the fji With the aforesaid observatiot Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, vf order to the respondents for complis|r cM<4i<r)*i1l 4l^?lf ^ f^i' '^f^'-^K ^3if;OT3ii^r" case is taken up. )1 for the petitioner. for tha State of Chhattisgarh. |ng counsel for the Uaion of India. (ionate appointment consequent upon Ihe State. ^titioner categorically stated that the |8-2-1999 i.e»after 1-11-1 997 and not in bateh of cases bearing W.P. luestion, orders have been passed by that similar orders may be passed in does not dispute the above fact and has taten a decision to consider the byees who died on or after 1/11/1997 ^y prevalent at that time. He however issyin'g necessary orders may be iade by learned counsel appearing for opinion on the merits of the case, in, iustice wilt be served if a direction is and the authorities concerned to he petitioner in accordance with the th of the employee concerned. If the int orders will be issued as early as Ist May, 2006. The petitioner is also to the authorities. It is made clear that titioner may. avail the remedy availabis letitiori before this Court. is, this petitipn stands disposed of. ho will be obliged to communicate the ice. ____>^——— Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge [^^f^