IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 623 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 111 OF 2003 THE RIVER PRINCESS HATAO MANCH THROUGH ITS CONVENOR ... Applicant Versus SALGAOCAR MINING INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD AND ANR ... Respondent Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the original Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for orginal Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. J. John, Advocate for original Respondent No. 5. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 23rd September, 2010 P.C. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the application for intervention is filed on apprehension that the the draft consent terms were likely to be filed. 2. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the draft consent terms are not approved by the cabinet and would not be filed. In view of this, the Intervention application does not survive and is disposed of. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. MF/-