1 cria2520.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2520 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5128 OF 2010 (Sanjay s/o. Manikrao Deokar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 01.12.2011 Mr. G.B. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent /State. Mr. V.A. Bagul, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 9. 1. The learned advocate for the applicant states that the respondents have violated the terms of bail. Hence the bail should be cancelled. Since the order granting bail was passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, present applicant has to move the concerned learned Additional Sessions Judge, who has granted the bail. The application cannot lie here. Hence, it is rejected. [R.Y. GANOO, J.] snk/2011/DEC11/cria2520.11