1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1451 OF 2007 Smt. Manisha Kishor Umate ... Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Sonpal, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 2ND APRIL, 2007 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The representation made by the petitioner was treated as an appeal and the same was dismissed under section 79(6) of the Maharashtra Municipal Council, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 being not filed within the prescribed time. This court by an order dated 3.5.2006 in writ petition No.3109 of 2006 has directed the employer to consider the representation made by the petitioner. Once that was the order, the representation made by the petitioner has to be considered irrespective as to whether it was time 2 barred. 3. We direct respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner's representation/appeal in terms of the order of this court dated 3.5.2006. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (R.M. SAVANT, J.)