a; HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A_No. 708 of 2006 Hon'bie Shri 5R. Nayak, CJ d Hon’ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. CORAM: APPELLANT NON—APPLICANT No.3 RESPONDENTS Branch Manager, T.P. Nagar', Korbu Through Branch Manager, Unifed India lnsumncg Company, Rajendra Nagar Chowkl, Biiaspur (C.G.)r ’ VERsus U‘H'mdevi, aged 43 year-s, wife of Rameshwar Chandra, Rameshwar Chandra, aged 46 years, Son oy of Makhanlal Chandra, 301% re$idenf of Viilage Jaijaipur, Dis‘rricT—Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), presen'r resident of Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur (ChhaTTisgarh) CLAIMANT Vishwanafh Chandra, aged 26 years, Son of Rameshwar Chandra, permanent residenf of Village—Jaijaipur, DisTricT— Janjgir-Champa (CG), presenf residen? of Bengalipara, Sarkanda, Disfricff Bikxspur (Chhah‘isgarh), (Owner of Yamaha Mo‘rorcycle No. C.G.—11—B—1830} Suiochana. Bai, aged abou‘r 20 years, Daugh'fer of Mohanlal, residenf of ViHage—Ulkhar, Tahsil—Sarangarh, Tahsil— Raigarh (Chha'rfisgarh) NQN—APPLICANT NO.1 & 2 9) Shri Pankaj Agrawal, iearned counsel for The appellant ORAL ORDER (mm on 19*“ June, 2006) The foliawing oral order of fhe Cour'r was passed by SRNA‘MK, CJ. Heard. ET was confended ‘l’ha? “the N\,A.C.T. ough‘i‘ no? ‘lo have fasfened ’rhe liabEliw ’ro pay compenea'i'ion on The appellan’r Insurance Company, icle ‘fhe aécidzm, did nof huve The“ driving Hcense a’r all. IT is becawe, an The dafa of fhe accident The driver- of The Momr Veh ea was Taken 'm The wriJr‘ren sfaiemen‘r fiied before i‘t had ‘uT'l’eriy failed 1’0 sube’ran’ria‘re Thai piea by adducing an In ThaT View of The maTTer‘, fasTening Th Insrsurahce Compahy To pay compensaTion could noT be faul aTher‘ poihT wae urged before is accnrdingly dismissed. No cosTs. r f involved iri “'rme iha'i‘ such a pi ‘ifhe N\.A.C.Ti by Insurance Company, but yevidence. e iiabiii‘ry on The Ted. No us; The appeal is devoid of meriT and iT ‘ I . Sd—/ Dlllp Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ii ' VT Sd/- Chief Justice ‘ l ‘