THBHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S)NO. <3>S6^ /2010 .^" ^ Smt. Rayi Darii Tigga, W/o Gosnar Tigga, aged about 43 years, oecypation - ServiGe Upper DivisiQn Teacher, Presently Lecturer - Govt <ff' lCcl^lldj J71COCJ.1L1J l./Cl-LU.lCl — U'U 6^ ^-^^ Higher Seeondary. School, TriBal :VA..- ^^'^••"": ^"' i? RESPONDENTS Depft, Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashp-ur VERSUS 1. "' State ofChhattisgarh, through Secretary, DeparttUent of • Triba.l 'Welfare, . Dau ; Kalyan Suigh Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) i 2. Asst. Comrnission.ei', Deptt of.Triba! ^-Welfare, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur CG 3. BIock EducatioFt QiScer, ,'BIoek. - • Patthalgaoi'fy Bistt. uJasHg').lr|((SG) ; awfi^^s'B^oN^at^ffi©»a^^(3i@3»s®^^ llhr' sii^i w (<-ii<* wn sii^i SPTO? ^er '^raid'M, ©fll'M're,^c'iwy ^...W^.^.S.^ sv^v Tra?? ('^f3^?) T^iiw ;sflra aii^i SB: Hon'bte Shri Manindn NloHan Shrivastewa.aL 07.074010 ShriA^.BhaUa,i Ms. SangeetoWldwa, Pan^l t g HeaFd. advalice „ _^ Leamed coun^lappeari%|ft)rthe is enBtled to benefit of faro passed B.TJ. examinatlon befor^ submitted Uiat ttie issue invo|ve4i Intefffa and the same has been in the case of Aafoa Saxaiia vs. 59. increments on accmint of s(»hartng her appolnbnent at her cMm cost.it is In the present peBtten te n®tonger reis fir|atly decided byth»HonWa Supiwna Court SMe afM.P. & Ofs.. aOM <S»»MIMR CSC} It fe ftirttwr sutmittBd that tftfe order dated 06-02-20(» (assedj counsel for the petttioner ftirther 29-04-2010 psssedln Writ Appea| judgment of flw Supreme Gwirt iii| order passed by this Court in have been issued tor consfderatlon increments as per cireular dated Pradesh, aftor veriticatlon Learned counsel for Vtw\ pefiUoner would also be consideretl ofthefalsts «bl<li<"i<ft;TWTCTf 4 fsxi! tfqt^lt ^TsiRmai^! Oourt hs»ateo tritwt a slmllar ^rtew in its in WJ».(S)No5257 oT 2008. Leame^ ^rawsattention of ftils Gourt te order dated No.124 of 2009, wheretn retying upen ttis the ease of Asha Saxena (a<pfa$ amt U» of the case for grant of two adwnca p1-C»-1974issued by the Stete of Madt^a ptadedin the peBBwi. 3- Feapendanls submte ttot ease ef ttie on ttiesame lines. aikettier ,fgS1RRT,CTCTT<pri.»—FS/r47—2/2010—1,00,000. &.i ;—-A 7ST '*lWW^, ffillylis, T^TTHy t^P^') '^»-2>s?£LfJl-o ST^T 'VR; (l?^'5"^) sfi^r q>r R-iiw ^ff 3TI^T st)*ii<=t» •OSKP& wirotflfltffsii^r "a,- In view of ttie stsrtement ;<»ffwtth a dlrecUon to the elaim of the prtiBoner for grant dated21-09-1^4 Issued byttw respon<(ent 4f %^ttie t^cls pteaded in Ihe f-&'.>^WiK&y.s.^ fl:^^"^•^"SK ': f' !>• <*i'sil<-i41'T wraf'? ft!A <R|I({|< ^srRman^i abovB.ttris.patittonistindlydispesett autftorfUes to eonslder and decule IU», Iwo advancs Incromente t per eircutor of Madhya Prad^h, after vwUteatlon of p^itton wil^iin a perlod of elght weel®from toda^;. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 5ire<|ii^hrgCTi3>T,CT<T?'rrT—FS7r47—2/2010—1,00,000. +