8.3. Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J 23.9.2008 Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. AG for tho State] applicant Mr. Anil Gulati, counsel‘for the respondent No. 1. By this petition, the applicant] State has prayed for extension of time to decide the matter pertaining to grant of lease of land in favour ii, of the respondent N0. 1 as the same could not be decided with a period of six months, as directed by this Court vide order dated 27.10.2006 passed in W.P.No‘3880/ 2006.. For the reasons indicated in this application, which is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondent, the prayer is allowed and the applicant] State is dire ‘ted to decide the matter pertaining to grant of lease within a period of six months hum today. Sdl- / The petition is, amording ’ disposed of: Dh’xrend‘a Mishia Xudge . mmMéQ-«wg 1112009 mm (Wu) WWW ammm mm ma m mm 1®€tW a; ai‘Erq 311%?! / APPLICANT State of Chhattisgarh, Through z Th€ RESPONDENT Sccrctary, Department of Urban NO. 1 Administration & Development DKS fa E‘hawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Cihhattisgarh. Versus RESPONDENT ‘ 1. Bajrang Lal bansal, Aged about 48 N9. 1 l PETiTiaNER ysars, S/o Shn' Ladu Ram Bansal, R/o 2 46, Samta Colony, Kaipur, Cihhattisgarh. RESPONDENT 2. Chjtf Municipal O$ce13 Municipal No.2 Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.