IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 21835 of 2010 Date of decision : 10.03.2011 Satnam Singh and another ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Dr. Sushil Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Ranjit S. Dhiman, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, the petitioners moved complaints (Annexures P-3 & P-4), but no decision has yet been taken by the Director, Rural Development and Panchayat, Punjab (respondent No.2). After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2, to decide the complaints (Annexures P-3 & P-4) and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. March 10, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge