CRM No. M-29391 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-29391 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.03.2009 Anil and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate, for Mr. RajeshKhandelwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.C. Gupta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the complaint dated 10th January, 2008, under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 506 read with Section 34 IPC (Annexure P-1) and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that there are chances of amicable settlement of the dispute between the petitioners and the complainant. Learned counsel for the State has, however, pointed out that a cancellation report has been submitted in the court of competent jurisdiction by the State. The complainant/respondent No.2 has filed a protest petition, therein seeking to contest the cancellation report. According to the State counsel, the said protest petition is still pending before the competent court. It is thus evident that there is no amicable settlement CRM No. M-29391 of 2008 2 between the parties at this stage as the complainant is contesting the cancellation report submitted by the investigating agency. No other ground for quashing the FIR in question and consequential proceedings has been agitated. In this view of the matter, there is no ground to interfere in the inherent jurisdiction of this court for quashing the FIR. The petition is thus dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE March 16, 2009 'rajpal'