1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINA WRIT PETITION NO. 750 OF 2010 Mr. Allwyn Noronha .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents Mr. Satish R. Mishra for petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for State. Mr. Sandeep Patil for respondent no.3-BMC. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JUNE 30, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. As per the learned counsel, the petitioner is a resident of Kalina, Santacruz area and he is a social worker. He has planted gardens and developed public parks. As per him the activities of respondent nos. 5 to 9 which are other social organizations in the same area are required to be investigated by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai and the Municipal Corporation of 2 Greater Mumbai. He further states that respondent nos. 5 to 11 are trying to implicate him in false cases so as to defame the petitioner’s name before the society at large. In case the petitioner is an interested person for any of these societies i.e. respondent nos. 5 to 9 and if he has any complaint about their administration, nothing prevents him from approaching the office of the Charity Commissioner at Mumbai and in case it is his case that any of these bodies or any of the respondent nos.5 to 11 have committed any offence, he may file a private complaint before the Metropolitan Magistrate and seek investigations under Section 156(3) of Cr. P. C. Having regard to the reliefs prayed for in this petition, it is obvious that the petitioner is a busybody and hence it deserves no indulgence by this court. The petition is rejected summarily. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 3