IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2010 / 4TH ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 1394 of 2008(F) -------------------------------- (THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.20001/2005 DATED 27/06/2008) .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------------- P.T.CHACKO, GOVT.CONTRACTOR,' SANTHA BHAVAN, KALANJOOR. P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, P.W.D, (ROADS & BRIDGES),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, (ROADS & BRIDGES),SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.1394 of 2008 in W.P.(C)No. 20001 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of June, 2010 O R D E R Petitioner seeks review of the judgment of a learned Judge of this court, dated 27.06.2008 which reads as follows: “Aggrieved by Ext.P3 the petitioner has submitted Ext.P12 representation before the first respondent. One of the prayer is for disposal of the representation. In case no orders have been passed on Ext.P12 there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P12 with notice to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above.” I am not inclined to entertain this review petition because one of the prayers of the petitioner was to consider and dispose of Ext.P12 representation. That has been granted. When that was granted the other prayers cannot be considered. As such there is no reason to review the judgment. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/