THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.No.3860 of 2011 14th September, 2011 Between :- Chilumgari Obulamma .. Petitioner And Madam Chinna Obulamma And others .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.No.3860 of 2011 ORDER:- The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.5 of 2010 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddutur. She filed the suit against the respondents herein for partition and separate possession of her share in the suit schedule properties. According to the petitioner-plaintiff, the legal heirs of Peda Obayya filed O.S.No.66 of 2001 without her impleading as party and obtained preliminary decree. The plaintiffs in O.S.No.66 of 2001 are proceeding with the final decree. On coming to know of the final decree proceedings, she filed I.A.No.11367 of 2011 seeking her impleadment. Since her application is not being taken up, she approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though she is a sharer in the properties owned by Dasareddigari Yerra Obaiah, she has not been made a party in O.S.No.66 of 2001. She has filed an application in the final decree proceedings relatable to preliminary decree granted in O.S.No.66 of 2001 seeking her impleadment. She is at liberty to pursue the said application. Invocation of jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the given facts and circumstances is misconceived. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the impleadment petition filed by her in the final decree petition relatable to the preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.66 of 2001. In which event, the Trial Court has to take up the impleadment petition before passing any orders in the final decree proceedings relatable to the preliminary decree passed in O.S.No.66 of 2001. No costs. ________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J 14th September, 2011 smr