HIGH COURT OF QHHATTISGABH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WntPetiitonfS)NQ^3ffi2of2W7 Suresh Kumar Thawait, son of Udhoram Thawait, aged about 46 years, resident ofPragari Nagw Colnuy, Q. No. B- 219, Deepka District Korba ChhattisgaA. VERSUS " 1. South Eastem Coal Fields Limited, Throu^i ChiefGeneral Manager, (SECL), (West) Area, Post Kusmunda, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2. Deputy General Manager, SECL Dipka Expansion District Korba, Chhatusgarh. 3. Chief General Manager, Gevra Area, District Korba, Chhattisgarii. 4. Personnel Manager, Dipka Expansion, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. 5. Chief Mi"-iag Maaager, SECL, Dipka Exjwnsion Project, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. (WRTT PETTTION UNDER ARTtCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri, J.) Present : ShriK.N. Nande, Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri A.S. Gaharwar, Advocate for fhe respondents. ORALORDER 1. ¥-' 2. 3. 4. iffi (Passed on 13"' ofFebruary, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the subject matter raised in tfais petition has already been raised by the petitioner throii^i trade union before industrial relations of the management (Anaexure P/10). A meeting to that effect had akeady been taken place on 14.04.2007 (A-nnexure P/10). Since the industrial dispute for the same relief, prayed for in tfais petition, is already under consideration before the industrial relations of the managemerrt, the same can be prosecuted by the petitioner under the provisions of section 10 read with section 12 oftfae Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. ,In view of flie above stated facts, no parallel proceedit^s can be undertaken in this petition imder Article 226 ofthe Constitution ofladia. In view ofthe foregomg, this petitioa stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Liberty is reserved to the petitioiter to take recourse to remedy available underprovigions ofthe Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Satish K.Agnihotri Sahu Judge ^ SKSSSSSSS '' ' ^y^-