IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26855 of 2010 RAMESH KUMAR @ RAMESH RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06.08.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 240 of 2009/60 of 2009 arising out of Bhabua P.S. Case No. 99 of 2004 for offence punishable under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the submission of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that in an event which is said to have taken place on 7.5.2002 when this petitioner is alleged to have taken the son of the informant for providing employment in Punjab, the case has been instituted after a lapse of almost two years by way of complaint case on 10.3.2004 which was subsequently, registered in an F.I.R. under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and that this petitioner being the brother of the wife of the victim son of the informant had no motive to commit the alleged offence nor any motive has been attributed in the F.I.R, let the petitioner, namely, Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Ram be released on bail furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-1 Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Sessions Trial No. 240 of 2009/ 60 of 2009 (arising out of Bhabua P.S. Case No. 99 of 2004), subject to the condition that the petitioner would be attending the trial of the case on each and every date fixed and on failure on the part of the petitioner to attend the trial on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial Court, the Court concerned would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody. Anand Kr. (Jyoti Saran, J.)