AB 1949/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K MERUNO Heard Mr. Y Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BS Sinha, learne d Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Paltan Bazar P.S. Case No.481 of 2011 under section 406/420 of the IPC and is praying to be enlarged on pre-arrest bail . It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitione r that the petitioner is the owner of M/S EEUGENIICS ( Management Training Centr e) having its office at Ulubari and in the course of the business, the petitione r’s duty was to introduce Lime Light Media solution Pvt. Ltd. to different Manag ement institution at Guwahati. He has no other business connection with the said Lime Light Media Solution Pvt. Ltd. who has direct contact with those investors who invest in the said Lime Light Media Solution Pvt. Ltd. as revealed from the FIR. The learned Additional P.P. has also produced the case diary of the case. Accord ing to the learned Addl.P.P. what is revealed from the case diary is that the ci ty of Guwahati has become a prime target for such business of luring investors i n making deposit by offering various incentives. After hearing the learned couns el and also on perusal of the case diary as submitted by the learned Addl.P.P. , this Court is of the considered view that it’s the Lime Light Media Solution P vt Ltd. who has provided incentives to huge customers to invest in their company and the petitioner’s firm is not the firm accepting such investments. But the i nvestments are directly made to the said Lime Light Media Solution Pvt Ltd. and in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest of the petiti oner, namely, Rajarshi Roy in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be re leased on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating agency. With the above observations and directions, this anticipatory bail application s tands allowed and disposed of.