:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 136 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 136 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 136 OF 2007 IN IN IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2006 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2007 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2007 Ami Jagdeep Shah ..Applicant (Ori.Respondent) versus Jagdeep G. Shah ..Respondent (Ori.Appellant) Mr. Sayed Akhtar for the Applicant / Original Respondent. Mr. S. Jagtiani i/b. M/s. Desai & Diwanji for the Respondent / Original Appellant. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2007. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2007. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. (IN CHAMBER) : P.C. (IN CHAMBER) : P.C. (IN CHAMBER) : 1. Heard. 2. This is an application filed by the Applicant / Original Respondent for recalling the Order dated 16.11.2006 passed by us. The reason given for recalling of this order is that the Applicant / Original Respondent was not prepared to :2: make submissions on that date, she argued the matter herself, she had no assistance of lawyer and therefore the order which affects her interest particularly with reference to clause 4 or the case of interest of her minor should be recalled. We do not find any merit in the submissions. The request of her lawyer to take his written notes of submissions for the purpose of admission of this application, is rejected. Affidavit in Rejoinder is taken on record. 3. When we passed the order, we heard the Applicant / Original Respondent, she was capable of representing her interest, capable of arguing and understanding the nature of questions put to her and what we were doing and what we have done. We have protected the interest of the minor, even though she was not aware of the same. The right has been given to the minor to raise challenges after he attains majority. That is perfectly according to law. No interference is called for. Application is rejected. 4. Certified copy expedited. :3: (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)