IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1113 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN RFA.510/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:- DAMODARAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.LATE NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, AGED 62 YEARS, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM PALLIPPURAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. BY ADV. MS. K.V.BHADRA KUMARI MS. ANILA GEORGE RESPONDENTS:/APPELLANTS & RESPONDENTS NOS.2 TO 22: 1. KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O.SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PALLIPPURAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 2. SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM (R4), D/O. -DO-. 3. VASUDEVAN NAMBOODIRI, (R5), S/O. -DO- 4. NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI (R7), S/O. -DO-. 5. LEELA ANTHARJANAM, W/O.LATE NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, -DO-. 6. SREEDEVI @ AKAYIL THAMBURAN (R11) W/O.VASUDEVAN NAMBOODIRIPPAD, VENGATTUR MANAKKAL, KOTHACHIRA AMSOM AND DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 7. SAVITHRI ANTHARJANAM (R 12) W/O.KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI, PANAMPATTA MANAKKAL, PULASSERI AMSOM, MANNENGODE DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 8. RUDRAN @ RAVI NAMBOODIRI (R14) S/O.LATE VALIYA RAMAN NAMBOODIRI, RESIDING AT KADAVALLUR VILLAGE, KADAVALLUR DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 9. P.M.SAVITHRI, D/O.LATE -DO-, R/AT -DO- (R15) R.P. No. 1113/2009 : 2 : 10. KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI , S/O. -DO-. R/AT -DO- (R15) 11. P.M.VASUDEVAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O. LATE -DO-, R/AT -DO- (R17) 12. RAMAN NAMBOODIRI, S/O. -DO-, (R18) 13. RAMANI, (R19), D/O.RAMAN NAMBOODIRI -DO-. 14. P.R.RAMANARAYANA PRASAD (R20) THRIKKARIYUR AMSOM DESOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 15. UMADEVI @ BINDU (R21), RESIDING AT -DO-. 16. UMADEVI ANTHARJANAM, (SUPPL.R22), D/O.SIVARAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KIZHAKKINIYATH MANAKKAL, ANAKKARA AMSOM, PERUMBALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 17. RUGMINI @ THANKAM, (SUPPL.R23) W/O.LATE PURUSHOTHAMAN NAMBOODIRI, KUMARAMPULAKKAL MANAKKAL, CHERUKUDANGAD AMSOM, PALLIPPURAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 18. HAREESH, S/O.RUGMINI @ THANKAM (SUPPL.R24), RESIDING AT -DO-. 19. DEEPA, D/O.-DO- (SUPPL.R25) RESIDING AT PANKIKKAD AMSOM DESOM, ERANAD TALUK. 20. NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, (SUPPL.R26) LR OF 26, H/O.LATE THANKAM @ SREEDEVI, NHATTUVELA MANAKKAL, MANGALAM AMSOM, MODAPPAKKAD DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 21. PRADEEP, (SUPPL.R27) S/O.LATE THANKAM @ SREEDEVI, R/AT -DO-. 22. PRAMOD, S/O.LATE THANKAM @ SREEDEVI, (SPPL.R28), R/AT -DO-, NHATTUVELA MANAKKAL. ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN FOR R1 MR. PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH FOR R1 MR. K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P. No. 1113 of 2009 in R.F.A. No. 510 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009. ORDER Heard both sides. Prima facie, I am not inclined to entertain the submissions on behalf of the review petitioner who, contrary to the report submitted by the court below and extracted in the judgment sought to be reviewed that the final decree in the case was passed, contends otherwise. This Court had directed the court below to dispose of the final decree application i.e., I.A. no. 752 of 1991 only after considering the objection dated 29.01.2008 filed by the 1st respondent herein and others to the report dated 21.01.2008 referred to in paragraph 6 of the judgment dated 31.03.2009 of the court below after giving all the parties concerned an opportunity of being heard. The review petitioner can also make his submissions before the court below. Reserving this right of the review petitioner as well, this Review Petition is dismissed. The court below shall dispose of the final decree application expeditiously and at any rate within four months of receipt of a copy of this order. Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. V. RAMKUMAR , J. -------------------------------------------------- C.M. Application No. 1916 of 2009 in R.P. No. 1113 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009. ORDER Heard both sides. Having regard to the averments in the affidavit in support of the petition and in view of the order proposed to be passed in the Review Petition, the delay is condoned. Dated this the 16th day of December, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv