:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1842 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.784 OF 2000 Shri Sudhir Waman Jogalekar ...Applicant. V/s Shri Satish Gopalkrishna Pillai and another ...Respondents. -- Mr. S.R. Pednekar for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Hardikar for respondent No.1 Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for the State. --- CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. DATE: 23rd March, 2005 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for respondent No.1. 2. This is an application for restoration of Writ Petition No.784 of 2000 which was dismissed for want of prosecution as a result of the order dated 26/3/2004. By the said order, this Court had directed that if the office objections are not removed within six weeks the matter shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. It is stated in the application that these objections could not be removed within six weeks and, therefore, the Writ Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that there are :2: four other writ petitions which are pending in this Court. He undertakes to remove the office objections if the Writ Petition is restored. 3. Taking an overall view of the matter, this is a fit case for restoration of the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is restored. Conditional order dated 26/3/2001 is set aside. Petitioner is directed to remove the office objections within four weeks. On removal of office objections, Writ Petition No. 784 of 2000 to be tagged along with Writ Petition Nos. 594/2000, 596/2000, 597/2000 and 441/2001 V.M. KANADE, J.