IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50862 of 2007 MADAN PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 28.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as the informant. Petitioner is the father-in-law of the complainant. It has been submitted that he is 70 years old and he is ready to keep O.P. No. 2. Counsel for the O.P. No. 2 submits that the submission made on behalf of the petitioner is nothing but to extract the order in his favour as on earlier occasions also, same statement was made and considering that, the complainant gave her consent to live in the family of her husband. She was tortured. Her in-laws tried to burn her. She received burn injury. Second time, she came and repeatedly the same treatment was given to her. Thereafter, she filed the present complaint case. The O.P. No. 2 is not ready to go to her matrimonial home. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Madan Prasad in connection with Complaint Case No. 1333/07 is rejected. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)