IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5213 of 2010 PANCHAN RAI, S/o Atim Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 07.04.2010 A supplementary-affidavit has been filed stating therein that the charges have been framed as directed by order dated 04.03.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 307, 342, 323, 324, 325, 304 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-B) A of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about four years the petitioner has remained in custody since 16.10.2009, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with S.Tr. No. 225 of 2004 arising out of Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 40 of 2003 subject to the - 2 - following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the fact that the case is of the year 2003 and now the petitioner is in regular attendance. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)