1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 104 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 67 OF 2008 Jignesh Mathurdas Gandhi. .... Plaintiff V/s. Satish Dhirubhai Modi. .... Defendant AND Hitesh Bhagwatrai Sanghvi. ... Respondent. ....... Mr. A.M. Vernekar for the Plaintiff. Mr. Kishore Jain with Mr. Satyen Vora i/b. Markand Gandhi & Co. for the Defendant. ........ CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 14TH JANUARY 2008. P.C. :- Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff states that the residential flat more particularly described in prayer clause (c) of the 2 motion as already been sold on 8th January 2008 in pursuance of a registered agreement executed jointly by the Defendant together with his mother who was the co-owner, for consideration. Counsel agrees to furnish full inspection of the document to the Plaintiff. In these circumstances, the application for injunction is not pressed at this stage. The Notice of Motion is disposed of, leaving it open to the Plaintiff to apply for appropriate relief with liberty to take out a fresh proceeding in accordance with law. ------