1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.511/2005 Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd vs Manohar Lal & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 28.1.2005 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. Ravi Bhansali, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The two courts below found the prima facie case, balance of convenience in favour plaintiff-non-petitioner and, thereafter, finding that in case injunction order will not be granted, the plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury and granted ad-interim order against the disconnection of the electricity supply to the plaintiff’s unit. The interim order was confirmed by the trial court on 1st June, 1999. More than four years have already passed now. Looking to the nature of the suit, the suit itself can be decided expeditiously by the trial court. Therefore, this court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order passed by the two courts below in the matter of grant of temporary injunction. However, the trial court is requested to decide the suit expeditiously as the suit appears to have 2 been filed in the year 1989. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. The copy of this order be sent to the trial court. (Prakash Tatia), J. c.p.goyal/-