1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2659 OF 2002 PETITION NO.2659 OF 2002 PETITION NO.2659 OF 2002 Shri M.R.Sutar .. Petitioner vs 1. Tata Memorial Centre & anr .. Respts Mr C.U.Singh with Ms Shobhana Gopal for Petr Mr S.K.Talsania with Mr S.Uttam i.b Mulla & Mulla for Respts CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G.KARNIK, J : D.G.KARNIK, J : D.G.KARNIK, J DATE: DATE: DATE: 22nd June, 2005 22nd June, 2005 22nd June, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties I am of the view that ends of justice would be served by treating the interim order passed by this court on 14th October, 2002 as a final order in the petition for the reasons mentioned below : 2. The Writ Petition is directed against an interlocutory order. By an order dated 9th September, 2002 the Industrial Tribunal Mumbaui 2 rejected the interim relief pending hearing of the complaint before it. That order was challenged in this writ petition. By an order dated 14th October, 2002 this Court granted interim relief which is in force for a period of nearly three years. By this time, the original complaint itself must have become sufficiently old to be ready for hearing. In my view, therefore the original complaint before the Industrial Tribunal itself can be expedited by confirming the interim relief passed by this court. Hence, I pass the following order : " Hearing of the Complaint No.ULP-615 of 2002 pending before the Industrial Court, Mumbai is expedited. The Industrial Court is requested to hear the matter expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the receipt of the writ of this court. The interim order passed by this court on 14th October, 2001 shall continue to be remain in force till the disposal of the complaint. " D.G.KARNIK, J