IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 22ND BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28158 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JINSHA K, IIND YEAR STUDENT KANNUR DENTAL COLLEGE, ANJARAKANDY, P.O.MAMBA, KANNUR. 2. KHAN YASMIN BHUGGAN, DO..DO.. 3. SRUTHI P.K.,DO..DO. 4. RUBIA, DO..DO.. 5. DIVYASREE .P DO..DO... 6. NAZRIN.N.R DO..DO.. 7. RESHMA MARY THOMAS DO..DO.. 8. FATHIMATH NOORIYA T.K DO..DO.. 9. ANU JOSEPH DO..DO. 10. VINCY RAM V.K DO...DO.. 11. ARUN A DO..DO.. 12. AMRETHESH P DO..DO.. 13. ANEETA SEBASTINE DO..DO.. WPC NO.28158/10 -2- 14. SHANTHI V DO..DO... 15. BISNIRAG .K.T.V DO..DO.. 16. HARSHNA .C DO..DO.. 17. SUMAYYA .S DO..DO.. 18. NADASHA AMBIKESAN DO..DO.. 19. ASHRAYA .C.M, DO..DO.. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.SRINIVASAN SRI.VINODKUMAR SRI.JIMMY GEORGE SRI.A.S.BENOY RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. KANNUR UNVERSITY , REP BY REGISTRAR KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, MANGAD, KANNUR-673003. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, KANNUR DENTAL COLLEGE ANJARAKANDY, P.O.MAMBA, KANNUR-67011. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS KANNUR UNIVERSITY, KANNUR-673003. SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/09/2010, ALONG WITH WPC NO.28167/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NOs. 28158 & 28167 OF 2010 ========================== Dated this the 13th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners in these writ petitions are BDS Students under the 2nd respondent College, which is affiliated to the 1st respondent University. According to the petitioners, the 1st year examination was held belatedly on 11th of February, 2010, and the results were also belatedly declared only on 23/6/2010. It is stated that although under the regulations, they were not eligible to continue the studies in the second year, having regard to the delay that was caused by the University in conducting the examination, as also for declaring the results, when the second year classes started, they were permitted to attend the classes. It is stated that supplementary examination is to commence soon. But however, the college is now preventing the petitioners from attending the classes. Petitioners thereupon submitted representations to the 1st respondent and relying on the observations made by this Court in Exts.P3 and P4 judgments, these writ petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representations in the light of Exts.P3 WPC Nos. 28158 & 28167/10 :2 : and P4. 2. Although the standing counsel for the respondent University points out that the observation made in the judgment relied on is against the direction of this Court in WA NO.1342/2007, having regard to the fact that the decision on the representations is yet to be taken, I dispose of these writ petitions directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P2 representations made by the petitioners in accordance with law. Orders shall be passed at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of these writ petitions. Writ petitions are disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp