wvw-!-v c f-,^ 00?- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA^PUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONERS ^ ^^1 '.^••\'-..--••' ^'y^ ^ ^ W.^^(SI No. 4^°^7 / 2006 :/, 1. Vishnu Dayal Sidar, S/o Shri Badku Ram Sidar, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Khapridih Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Cha-i-mp^. (C.G.) .;:.'2. Smt Ashok Maravi (Now Raj), W/o Shri Sukalu Singh Raj, aged about 34 Years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Sonthi, Block- Bamhnidih, Distt. Janj'gir Cha-mpa^ (C.G.) Ganesh Ram Kerketta, S/o Shri Tuni Ram Kerketta, aged about 37 /^Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School , Semariya Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Cha-mp^, (C.G.) 4. Bhagau Lal Ratnaker, S/o Shri Budhram Ratnakar, aged about 42 Years Assistant Teacher , Govt. Primary School , Bhawarmaal (Champa) Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Chas.m^(C.G.) *4 5. Lakan Lal Lahre, S/o Shri Arjun Lal Lahre, aged about 37 Years Assistant Teacher , Govt. Boys Primary School , Thathari Block Jaijaipur, Distt. Janjgir Cha-mpt (C.G.) I •A 6. Fir Say Khosale, S/o Shri Budhram, aged about 37 Years Assistant Teacher , Govt. Primary School , Karibhawar, Block Jaijaipur , Distt. Janjgir Char-mp^C.G.). 7. Smt. Geeta Bharatdwaj (Now Saytoda), W/o. Ram Narayan Saytoda, aged about 34 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School , Kekrabhath, Block Jaijaipur , Distt. Janjgir Chai^mpa.. (C.G.). 8. Smt. Fulkeriya Minj (Now Bada), W/o. Shudir Bada, aged about 39 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Akalsara, Block Jaijaipur , Distt. Janjgir Chai-m^ (C.G.) 9. Smt. Neera Pradhan, W/o. Ram Narayan Pradhan, aged about 34 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School, Champa, Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Chapm^(C.G.). 10. Smt. Pramila Satyam (Now Patley) W/o. G.R.Patley , aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Bhojpur, Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Cha^-m^ 41 Y_^' f.v •;' ^11. Dalganj Singh Maravi, S/o Shri Natwar Singh, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Jan Primary School, Datuod, Block Jaijaipur, Distt. Janjgir Chs«-m^ (C.G.). ^12. Shyam Lal Ratre, S/o Shri Itwari Ratre, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Middle School, Baloda, Block Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Cha^tmp^ (C.G.). ^13. Khilendra Kumar Maravi, S/o Shri Rangi Lal Maravi, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Middle School, Baloda, Block Baloda, Distt. 'Janjgir Chatrm^ (C.G.). 14. Smt. Meena Ranjan, (Now Masih) W/o Raj'esh Masih , aged about 42 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Barpali Champa, Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. Chaym^C.G.). State ofChhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director ,Public Instruction ,Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur District Education Officer, . Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ^e' •:-iS5Mssa ^SSS^is:S^^@i^i v WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS. DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. The petitioner above named most respectfully submits as under:- XI-HC-78 *11*1CTI Sh*lich 3^ '<11<IIM<1, »T(IWIS,RlC1l*fy (u. P.U •)•..'67.®.7-• • yiq- 200 & 3<1^<1 4a«n(yit^ai^eT) Sd^fT ?iT R-fi* gwsn^rsbtii* TOTfW flf^cT 3f1^T »bi<iTf]<fl-< t<i*«iTfftet^t<[ai<^i< ^3ri^IT3fI^?T 07.12.2006 Shri Anil Singh Rajput, learfied counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Pandey, leamec) P.L. for the State/respondent. By this petition under Articfes 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a direction tc of the decision rendered by the the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of the c^ate of their initial appointment in ttie light learned State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Application l^o. 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and othei|s) dated 24.8.1992 2. Learned counsel appearinb the order dated 9th October 2006| No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kuma^ Chhattisgarh and others) and in Bajpai Vs. State of Chhattisga^h petitionere are similarly situatec|, passed. MlVrit 3. The case of the petitioners Teacher in the School Education for the petitioners placed reliance on passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) Sharma and another Vs. State of Vrit Petition (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath and others) and submits that the , therefore, the similar order may be is that they were appointed as Assistant Department on probation for a period of two years with the fixed salary. H|awever, later on, after completion of two years' probation, the petitioners v|/as regularized but, they were not given the regular pay scale. Other simparly situated teachers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpu^ made several representations to for regular pay-scale, wherein learned Tribunal vide order dated 24.8.11992 allowed the same. The petitioners accord the same treatment as they are _Q_ XI-HC-78 ^a^-iii'wiali'aRlltiM^iRK'iiwiy 8V-3H-IX .— -Z-- rtSIFT^aiWSR ••"^•"""-'^"'^CTTOS ./-,au^ginpsnt(iyilg]ai<^Ei) SII^TW (iwsn^i Sfliqi RTt 'S 'i'K5F?F .^rp-T'^iT?'^ •:g TOITW sfitT sn^r *l«fd41^Wv\\'!f fe^^i^KP T^T6 ^W Kgi'R TOTWS ^; gri^ an^pH-TO roTrem; also similarly situated,ibut, the res^ondente have not paid a]ny heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Learned counsel for the pet|tioners submits that the ^etitioners may be allowed to make a representafion to respondent No.1 |to givesimilar i|d same pay-scate which has been led teachere on account tof the order of dated 24.8.1992, to '?which learned treatment to the peltitioners an| sanctioned to other sitnilariy situa< the State Administra^ive TribunE) counselfor the respontient/State h^is noobjection. 5. Having heard l^arned coyn ^el for the parties and h^ving regard to the facts and cireumstlances of th^ case, in the opinion ofjthis Court, the limited prayer made b^ learned c^unsel for the petitionersjappears to be reasonable. Therefore, the pe^itioners are allowed 1 to make a representation within |a period bf No.1, raising all his gr|evances an the said representation in an objei two weeks from today to respondent (1, in turn, respondent Nol.1 shall decide tive manner within a peijiod of 30 days from the date of receipt of such i|epresentation, after considering all the I .... 1 . . .. . . . .. j points raised by the petitioners a(id taking into account t^e order dated 24.8.1992 passed by the learned Application No. 2745/1889. 6. The writ petitiQn is accorijlingly disposed of with i the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rules. itate Administrative Trib^nal in Original Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.