IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 25555 of 2011(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : ------------------ SITHARA, D/O. AMBILI, AGED 29, RESIDING AT SREE MOOKAMBIKA, MANCHAVILAKOM, NJARAKKA MUGAL, MEKKOLA, KOLLAYIL DESOM, KOLLAYIL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, MANCHAVILAKOM POST-695503. BY ADVS. SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR SMT.A.NEENA JOSE SRI.P.M.SANEER SRI.V.S.THOSHIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARASSALA-695 001. 4. GOPINATHAN, S/O. PADMANABHAN, AGE ABOUT 68, WEAVING SOCIETY, KOLLAYIL, POOVATHOOR DESOM, MANCHAVILAKOM POST-695 503. R1 TO R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING : NS W.P.C NO.25555/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT. P1 : COPY OF JUDGEMENT DATED 19.08.2011 IN W.P.C. NO.21513/11(L). EXT. P2 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 20.09.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RURAL S.P. , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE NS N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ W.P.C. No. 25555 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Serious complaints have been made by the petitioner with regard to the improper conduct of the investigation in two crimes viz; 754/11 and 755/11 of Parassala police station. The learned counsel submits that in spite of the fact the offence disclosed and crime registered was under Sections 452 and 354 IPC, the Sub Inspector himself granted bail to the accused as if Section 452IPC is a bailable offence. That itself according the petitioner would show the inclination of the Sub Inspector to help the accused. The learned counsel has highlighted so many aspects to show that the investigation is not conducted properly. Considering all these aspects it is just W.P.C. No. 25555 of 2011 2 and proper to direct the investigation to be suprvised by Dy.S.P. of Neyyattinkara. It is ordered accordingly. But it is made clear that the investigation in this case shall not be allowed to be conducted by S.I. of Police, Parassala. This petition is disposed of accordingly. Dy.S.P, Neyyattinkara will take the case file from the S.I. of Police, Parasala immediately. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE smvd