IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal writ Petition No. 76 of 2009 Vedananad @ Ved Prakash and others ....... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ....... Respondents Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the cases submitted the final report against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit final report before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been made in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 12.02.2009 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 31.03.2009 Shiv