IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.(C) No. ‘?H of 2011 Singi‘e Bw’mh Vus ers RESPONDS ENT :1) ‘Prem Devi Widow of Sarju Prasad Gupta, aged out 44 ears Station ‘ and Tehsil Rajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) NON-APPLICANT No.2 APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT. ab y, " APPELLANT :: Branch Manager, United India NON—APPLICANT Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch No.1 Office, near Kumkum Hotel, Bramharoad, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) :2) Dinesh Kumar Gupta, S/o. late Sarju Prasad Gupta, aged about 2O years, \$ Both R/o. Village Munuwa, Post Karra, Police Station and Tehsil \q/“i ‘4}, \\ i6 Q Rajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) CLAIMANTS $::§\di/ ’ / \ :3) Santosh Kumar Gupta, S/o, late Sarju Prasad Gupta, aged about 22 years, Occupation Cultivation, R/o. Village Munuwa, Post Karra, Police 3am, ma,W diQtfps) W93 17 MAC I ’iHl w&mm (We) mmmm ‘U 199/ WW @W $31'Fmm :hant Kumar Mishra ’ ‘tice Pras SB. Honhle ShriJus 2106.291 1 . Shri H.B‘ AgrawaL Senior counei for he appenant. The appeal is barred by 1 condontion‘ 0f delay is filed. fl constituted. Te appeal is dismissed w§th liberty to the appeilant to file a duly h constituted appei afresh. i It is direce that on the a iugned order; the certmed copy mp him. Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, 29 days delay and no application for terefore, the appeal is not properly 'ppeliant supplying Xerox copy of the ' of the impugned order be returned to Sd/— Prashant Kumar Mish Judge s t a a td r . m