IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31941 of 2009 SAMU YADAV, Son of lalte Sacchu Yadav, resident of Mohalla-Chiraiyan Tand, P.S. Rampur, District- Gaya. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 15/10/2009 Heard Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as also counsel for the State. Considering that the injury in question sustained by the Informant punishable for an offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is attributable to one Tinku Yadav and the petitioner is said to be member of mob, this Court could have directed for enlarging the petitioner on bail right now, but then it is not inclined do so keeping in view that the petitioner has got a dubious past in which he has been made accused in two other criminal cases still pending against him. It is only this aspect of criminal antecedent of the petitioner which would make him liable to remain in custody till he completes a period of six months of his judicial custody. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Samu Yadav is directed to be released on bail on completing six months of his judicial custody, i.e, on or after 24th January, 2010, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Rampur P.S. Case No.79 of 2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailer of the petitioner shall be a close family member and also that the petitioner shall remain regularly present 2 in course of trial and his absence for two consecutive dates in course of trial would automatically entail the consequence of the cancellation of bail being granted to him under this order. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)