IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18208 of 2011 1. Raj Kumari Devi. 2. Sundar Das. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners being parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed with Santosh Das and after one year of the marriage Santosh Das died and informant's sister Veena Devi had been remarried with younger brother of Santosh Das in June, 2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the victim died due to diarrhea. It is also submitted that during investigation the accusation was found true only under Sections 306 and 201/34 of the I.P.C whereas final form was submitted against the husband. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, in the 2 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 220 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)