.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(S) No. 4/?) /2oo§> / Smt. Jyoti Tirky, W/o. Shri Vijay Kumar, aged about 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School — Thithaipara ,- kasra, Block — Baikunthpur, Distt. — Korea» (C.G.) t PETITIONER VERSUS State of Chhattisgrh, Through — The Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur I Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District— (Baikunthpur) Korea(C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block — Baikunthpur, Distt.- Korea (C.G.) a WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDI# FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT WRITS E DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. The petitioner above named most respectfully submits as under:- 1. PARTICULARSOF THE PETITIONER. ‘ As mentioned in the cause title. I XI-HC—78 Mr Arvmd Dubey ‘Panel lowyler for *he respondents/Sid Wifh ‘rhe consen‘f ¢f learned counsel appearing for *he parhes fhe muffers are heard finally and d Common order diclfafed in W‘. i ¢ passed saparai'ely. l A oopy of fhis ordor be placud on record in other conneé‘l'ed wril' pei‘i‘Hon. Slil— r Satish K. Agniimm 'Judge 15.1.2007 § Mr Aml Singh Rqgut AdvoJm-e for the petMoner-s Ispos¢d of. P. (s) No. 40 of 2007 ln opgn Court RT.O. e 16H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W P.(S) No 40 of 2007 W P.(5) No 41 of 2007 Pefifioner : 5min Bhalen‘fina Bada (Now Tirky) Versus ‘ Responden‘rs : Sm’re of Chhafrisgnr-h and o-thers SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Jus'tice Satish K. Agnilwrri, J Present: Mr. Anil Singh Rajpuf, Advocate for The pefitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer for the respondenfs/Sfa're. O R D E R y (Passed on This 15*“ Day of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe‘fifioners as wellvas for fhe Sfa're/responden'rs joinfly submi'r fha‘r 'l'he facts of 'rhe presenf wrif pe'rifions are similar +0 fha'r of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and ofhers vs. Sfafe Government of Chha'l'fisgarh & ofhers), which was allowed vide order da'red 7.11.2006. They furfher submif fhaf fhe question of low involved is also file same. Z. In view of fhe above sfafed submissions made by learned counsel for fhe parties, fhese pefifions are allowed in ferms of 'rhe order dated 7.11.2006 passed by fhis Cour? in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/200é (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh d: others). No order as to costs. 3; A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected i writ l N petition. . ‘ I Sdl— - Satish K. Agni‘nom ' Judge Thakur / Pe'ri'rioner : Smt Jyo11' Tirky Versus Respondents : Smfe of Chhamsgarh and ofher-s And