{1} wp230310.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2303 OF 2010 Sulochana w/o Pradeep Wani, age: 40 years, Occ: Household, R/o Main Road, Sawada, Tq.Raver, District Jalgaon. Petitioner Versus 1 Sitaram s/o Hari Patil, age: major, Occ: Pensioner, R/o Sawada, Tq. Raver, District Jalgaon. 2 Shri Swami Samarth Urban Co-operative Credit Society, Sawada, Tq. Raver, District Jalgaon, through its Administrator. Respondents Mr.V.B.Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, advocate for Respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 served. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 28 th January, 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT: 1 Heard learned Counsel for respective parties. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. {2} wp230310.odt 2 The point raised in the instant petition is no more res integra and is covered by the decision of this Court delivered on 22nd December, 2010 in a group of writ petitions i.e. Writ Petition No.5223 of 2009 and other companion matters. 3 For the reasons recorded in the judgment cited supra, instant petition also deserves to be allowed in terms of prayer clause (C) so far as it relates to petitioner only. 4 Rule is accordingly made absolute. In the facts and circumstances of this case, there shall be no order as to costs. Respondents shall have liberty to execute the order, passed by the Consumer Forum, as against the Co-operative Society i.e. Respondent No.2. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/wp230310