IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9180 of 2009 Suresh Mehta, son of Rameshwar Mehta, resident of Village- Mirgawa, Police Station-Triveniganj, District- Supaul. ……………………………………..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 27. 07. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the informant. Petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Section 366 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner was seen talking with the informant’s daughter at 8 P.M. The informant went outside and when he returned he found his daughter missing. Subsequently, her dead body was found. Submission is that there is no eye witness of the occurrence and at best it could be said that it is a case of last seen with the deceased and that too only talking with her. Her dead body was having mark of violence. She was strangulated to death. The petitioner was last seen with the girl who is hardly sixteen years of age. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and his prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. The petitioner ,however, may renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant. SKBOSE (Shyam Kishore Sharma)