!\ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case fCivil) No. 2-0%_^2011 • Bench APPLICANI/ I ^PETITIONER V. ^ .(. y^ ?/"./' /./: i1-' ^;.y^ / yi;^ ^' ./' ^s' /f ^ ^^€^^ f.'S' ^.Rajesh Pratap Singh, S/o Late Chandikeshwar Pratap Singh, aged about 40 years, R/o Village- Shiv Prasad Nagar, Tghsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS &.S. Dhananjay, Collector Surguja, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) ;'^./~-k ^y^ RESPONDENT / CONTEMNOR APPLLCATS.ON UNDER SECTCON 12 OF CONTTEAAPT OF Cjt ACT READ WITH ARTECLE'215 OF THE CONSTCT^ION OF INDIA FOR PUNISHING SUITABLY. THE CONTEMNOR FOR MSOBEOIENCE OF THE HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED \'.' 47.09.2009- /f/')^)o'^!| i!< 1 -• . .^_«^~<" /-/ ^ HWW shirai ^ST "41<41<1^1, ^Tily'ifi, fs|dl-S-)lj,< . i^At.&^(C )t^" '^'^fi^A ^F[, 200 ? '^r^fNr mr.SiT^r'aiiiN; ^aiw ^if??r 3;!^; '*i<<Iii«il-it(w?fiiffe%r <f»t<^i<' ^'3tfOT'3TI^ SB : Hon'bleShri ManindraMohan Shrivastava, J. 12-09-2011 Shri Govind Dewangan, counse for the petitioner. Shri Rakesh Jha, counsel for re^pondent. Heard. This contempt petition'has been filed by the petitioner alleging willful disobedience of order dated 16-11-2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (C) No.2891 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitic|n' had directed the respondents representation in accordance with lawj as expeditiously as possible, preferabjly decision has been taken by the Land] him compensation, which is not that by not deciding the matter withirl has flouted the orderofthe Court. petiticfner submits that though, this Court thterein to decide the petitioner's j, on its own merits and perspective, within a period of four weeks, the lAcquisition Officer belatedly offering acc^ptable to the petitioner. He submits the time stipulated, the respondent On the other hand, learned coijnsel for the respondentsubmits that directions of the Court was with regari? to consideration of petitioner's case for payment of compensation, for wtfich, competent authority is the Sub Divisional Officer. He submits that th4 of the petitioner on 14-02-201 1, and irfimediately thereafter, the entire case of the petitioner was forwarded tc^ appropriate orders in compliance of[ respondent received representation submits that the respondent has fully |complied with the order of the Court, the Land Acquisition Officer for the order of the Court. He further ./" !V> \ l/^s^ \ S f.' S 1 ^ ''•;^S^E::^ '-EC^ ••.s'-^^'" XI-HC—7S sn^rv W ^SiT <HT^?T ^Tqt^ Tumane 'S'Sf "q|t||^q^ 6?TJt?fTi^, fs|(niy^< ^ Ni*i<irg»tfRR •^FI, 200 an^T1??q7(Tiqt3^ti) 'RttiWBfea sn^r —^_- ctil^l^t^^ ^lMdf ^f f^t^ Tfoif^PC ^affiman^r the Land Acquisition Officer has cond(icted proceedings and finally offered compensation to the petitioner, which i]s not acceptable to the petitioner. Taking into consideration the sjubmission made by learned counsel for the parties, as also taking into cjonsideration the role played by the respondent and also taking into corisideration that the respondent had forwarded the case of the .petitioner to the Land Acquisition Officer immediately for compliance of the order of the Court, 1 am not inclined to proceed against the present respondent. Rule is therefore discharged. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the may take recourse to such remedy a law. With the aforesaid observation, lamount of compensation offered, he 3 may be available to him under the the petition is finally disposed off. .^--/•: Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge _/-/