IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1656 of 2009 SHEO KUMAR SATYAM, S/O- MUNARIK PRASAD, R/O- VILLAGE AMARPURA (EAST) POLICE STATION RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT -AURANGABAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2009 Heard the parties. The offence alleged is under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 and 419 of the Indian Penal Code The allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he obtained appointment on the basis of forged certificate. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the certificate/result was not published by the petitioner, but by the Uttar Pradesh Madhyamik Sanskrit Shiksha Parisad, Lucknow as contained in Annexure-2, whereby result of large number of candidates including the petitioner were published. As such, allegation of obtaining the forged certificate of passing the examination is not justified. It is further submitted that appointment of the petitioner was later cancelled. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner obtained appointment on the basis of forged certificate. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender - 2 - within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 24 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)