IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1519 of 2005 DR.SHASHI BHUSAN SINGH son of Sri Surendra Prasad Singh, resident of village-96-A, AshiyanaNagar Colony, Phase-01, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna ….Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, Bihar. 3. The Director General of Police, Patna, Bihar …..Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. K. Bhatnagar, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar Siha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A.K. Pandey, G.A-9. --------- 2 11.05.2011 Heard the parties. 2. For redressal of the grievances raised in the present proceeding, the petitioner claims to have represented before respondent no.3 by filing a representation dated 1.12.2004 (Annexure-3). However, according to the petitioner, despite his representation appropriate action has not been taken by the respondent no.3 till date. 3. Though, the writ petition was filed on 1.2.2005 and despite passage of more than six years, unfortunately, as usual, counter affidavit has not been filed on behalf of respondents. Asking for a counter affidavit may further delay the disposal of the present proceeding. 4. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner should approach the respondent no.3, by filing a fresh representation for redressal of his grievances, which have been raised in the present 2 proceeding, and that must be looked into by the respondent no.3 and appropriate order must be passed for redressal of the valid grievances of the petitioner. 5. The petitioner is hereby directed to appear before respondent no.3, within a period of four weeks from today with a certified copy of the present order and a detailed representation raising his grievances, which have been raised in the present proceeding. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner with a certified copy of the present order within the time prescribed by this Court, the respondent no.3 shall be obliged to consider the same in accordance with law and shall further be obliged to dispose of that representation by a speaking order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. If respondent no.3 comes to a finding that some appropriate direction is required to be issued for redressal of grievances of the petitioner, then that should be also issued by him without any further delay. Entire exercise must be completed by respondent no.3 within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation by the petitioner. 6. However, if the petitioner does not appear before respondent no.-3 with a certified copy of the present order and a detailed representation within the time prescribed by this Court, then it shall be construed that the present writ petition has finally been rejected by this Court. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, writ 3 petition stands finally disposed of. Rahman/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)