IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.270 of 2009 Sk.Atabul & Ors Versus Sk.Lokman & Ors ---------------------------------- 3 28-9-2011 No body appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, a perusal of the impugned order shows that the prayer for amendment in the plaint has been rejected and as such the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and therefore this application is not maintainable. However, in view of the decision in Durga Devi Vs. Vijoy Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954 it is appropriate that the petitioner should be granted an opportunity to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Four weeks’ time is allowed to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. roy ( V. Nath, J.)