IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46832 of 2008 1. MD.HARUN 2. ABU BAKAR 3. BIBI PUWERNI KHTOON 4. BIBI LUKHIYA KHATOON 5. BIBI JUBEDA KHTOON 6. BIBI JOHRA KHATOON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 366/364A of I.P.C. The submission is of false implication for an earlier case stated to have been lodged by the side of the petitioners against the informant and the alleged victim. The informant and others have been enlarged on regular bail in that. Learned counsel for the petitioner, from the allegations and the statement under Section-164 Cr.P.C. of the victim finds it difficult to meet the query of the Curt with regard to a temporary abduction when the victim is stated to have come back without any allegations of payment of ransom. Merely on the ground of temporary abduction this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 2. the application is rejected with regard to them. Considering that petitioners 3 to 6 are stated to - 2 - be ladies with no individual overt acts attributed against them, the existence of previous litigations between the parties, let petitioners 3 to 6 named above surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No.156 of 2002, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )