IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.496 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Ambika Sahni S/o Raj Mangal Sahni R/o Vill. Shympur Kutraha, P.S. Navtan District Beteya (Bihar) ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party Arising out of Case Crime No.205 of 2009, U/s 489-B, 489-C IPC, P.S. Kankhal, District Haridwar Dated: May 7, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that only 44 notes of Rs.500/- each were said to be recovered from his possession. He further submitted that the recovery of counterfeit currency is an offence punishable u/s 489-C which is a bailable offence. Lastly, he has got no previous criminal history. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Ambika Sahni be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Haridwar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. 7.05.2010 Rajeev Dang (Dharam Veer, J.)