1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.878/2008 In Writ Petition No.1337/2002 [Mohsin Ahmed Raja Ahmed .vrs. The State of Maharashtra and others] ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. A.C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. S.P. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for the respondents/State, Mr. P.C. Madkholkar, Advocate for respondent nos.10 and 11. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ DATED : APRIL 11, 2008 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. After going through the order dated 3.5.2002 passed by this Court and considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, we think that instead of seeking appropriate clarification/direction from this court, in case the authorities want to use their discretion in order to grant any concession in favour of the persons in the liquor 2 industry trade, the authorities should pass appropriate orders and place them before the Court and the orders should come in the force only after one month from the date the orders are so placed before this Court. It is needless to say that it is open for the petitioner as well as other respondents to comment on those orders. With this clarification, the civil application is disposed of. 3. S.O. to 21.4.2008. JUDGE JUDGE GULANDE