www) 'IMS/GS Ih THE M.P» ST&EE éENENI$TR§TIVE TRiguNgL AT u&BfLPUR 0figin&l Applica+icm R9. Pe%itiamex n w Versu$ m 2. 3. £auce%iom im$%ruc%ians,'Burg/Division Burg QMP}‘ ‘The Principal G0v Collega of Educafie§ R3ipur {MP). AFFLICAEIC§ UNEER SECTION 19 OF THE AD TRIEUEALS AC3” 1985 3 4w r3 ‘E STRATEVE /l\. ZCE§?\\ ' Www 3m%. Rajai Shgrma, 3ge& $bQuk A? yaa $9 wife 0f $h?i DgR. 5herma, Vice Principal$ G5v% Dig++ Ims%i+u+e of Edu0$+ian and Trainimg Khairgggrh, Sistf Rajngndgaon {PP}. Respandent$ :31. ihe $%z&e of M.P. +hrgugh &he Secrekary Gnvf o§ FhP. Schoal Educa*i0n 3epar%mea% Man+ralayay Vallahh Bhgwan, Bhapal (NP), The Ccmmissioner/ Direcker 0f Public Insfruc%iansy Ehapal {W?). The Jain% Direc+0r Public B i] QM x HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.1495 OF 2005 r PETITIONER Smt. Rajni Sharma Versus RESPONDENTS The State of MP. & Others Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- None for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar,.Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER jORALi (Passed on this 15' day of Decéember, i009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) ln view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. / Sd/- . . satish K. Agnihom ‘ Judge . Thakur