HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 1593 of 2009 DATE: 23-12-2010 Between: Sri G. Raghava Reddy …….. petitioner and Sri P. Nageshwara Reddy and another …….. respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 1593 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the defendant who filed this Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constituting of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the dismissal order, dated 02-03-2009 passed in C.M.A.No.284 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, confirming the order, dated 08-12-2008 passed in I.A.No.1544 of 2008 in O.S.No.485 of 2008 on the file of the I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, which was filed by the respondents-plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C. seeking interim injunction restraining alienation in respect of a property. Both the Courts below have concurrently held against the petitioner-defendant and granted interim injunction. Hence, the Revision Petition. Heard both sides. It is seen that this Court, while admitting the Revision Petition, on 18-04-2009 has granted interim suspension in C.R.P.M.P.No.2271 of 2009 on condition of the petitioner furnishing third party security in respect of the property and the said order is still in force. In view of the same and further there being no scope as such for any interference in regard to the property in question, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the lower Court is directed to continue the interim suspension granted by this Court on 18-04-2009 till the disposal of the suit. It is always open for the respondents herein to raise any objections in regard to the correctness or acceptability of the security and those objections shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed. The lower Court shall dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the circumstances, no order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 23-12-2010 YCR