1 FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3538 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri. V.R. Sonvalkar, Advocate for petitioner (Absent). Shri. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for State. CORAM: V.C. DAGA & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATED: 18th JULY 2009 P.C.: 1. None for the petitioner at even second call. The dismissal of the petition in default invariably results in moving motion for restoration application. It creates strain on the registry. It does not serve the interest of justice. 2. In the above circumstances, we went through the petition so as to consider and decide it on its own merit. 3. After having gone through the same, we find that in this petition, the petitioner is seeking relief to delete the name of respondent No. 4 from the revenue record and asked for directions against the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. The petition revolves around the dispute pertaining to the mutation of the property. The petitioner can agitate his claim well under the 2 provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. 4. In this view of the matter, we do not propose to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed in liminie with no order as to costs. [A.V. POTDAR, J.] [ V.C. DAGA, J.] ssc/wp3538.09