IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35731 of 2011 Mukesh Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 21-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under sections – 395,397,414,307 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioner was caught at the spot just after the alleged occurrence. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no looted article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner which is evident from perusal of the seizure list. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, particularly keeping in mind that as per report of Registrar, list and computer, the prayer for bail of one co- accused, namely, Ramjee Yadav @ Munu @ Nunu Yadav has already been rejected by this court and furthermore, the petitioner has been caught at the spot just after the alleged occurrence, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Navanagar P.S. Case No. 59 of 2011 pending in the court of Sri D.N.P. Singh, learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C. No.-V ), Buxar is, hereby, rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. A.K. Vishwakarma/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)