((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2491 OF 2008 Meghna Rushab Parekh Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & anr. Respondents B.A.Desai, Sr.Counsel i/by M/s.Gordhandas & Fozdar & Co. for petitioner. Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd April 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been filed and in fact prayer in this petition is for quashing the charge sheet. Remedy of filing appropriate application before the Trial Court is available to the petitioner. Therefore, this petition invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India and section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not entertained by keeping the remedy of the petitioner open. It is obvious that if the petitioner does not succeed before the Trial Court, it will always be open for the petitioner to file a fresh petition in ((-2-)) this Court raising the contentions which are raised in this petition. Subject to what is observed above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before the Trial Court. (A.S.OKA, J.) ((-3-)) mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.274 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearnaces, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.B.A.Desai, Sr.Counsel i/by M/s.Gordhandas & Fozdar & Co. for applicant. Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd April 2009 PC :- 1. Learned APP seeks time to ascertain whether the State intends to file any appeal against acquittal. Stand over till 24th June 2009. (A.S.OKA, J.)