CWP No.8166 of 2009 Jai Kishan and others Vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr.Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.R.S.Kundu, Addl.AG, Haryana. Mr.Siddharth Batra, Advocate for respondent No.3. * * * Petitioners were initially appointed as T.Mate on daily wage basis during the years 1978-1982. It is stated that services of the petitioners were regularized on the post of T.Mate in the pay scale of Rs.750-940/- w.e.f. 28.1.1988 on completion of four years of continuous service on 31.12.1986 at par with the State Govt. employees. The petitioners were later on promoted to the post of Electricians in the pay scale of Rs.950-1150/- and they were confirmed as electricians on 25.1.1994. The petitioners were claiming the benefit of the Hayyana Govt. Instructions (revised pay scale). The Executive Council of respondent No.3-University has adopted Resolution No.42 on 21.7.2007 for placement of the category of posts like Electrician (grade I), Electrician, Electrician (grade II) in one category and their further placement in the scale of Rs.4000-6000/- w.e.f. 1.1.1996 under Section 9-F of Maharshi Dayanand University, Act, 1975. The University is not entitled to adopt any resolution and revised pay scale without obtaining prior approval of the govt. The University adopted the aforesaid resolution and approached the govt. for taking necessary action in terms of Section 9-F of Maharshi Dayanand University, Act, 1975 referred to above. Reply has been filed on behalf of Stat. It is argued on behalf of the State that resolution adopted by the Executive Council of the University is not legally valid. However, no decision taken by the govt. in this regard has been produced on record. It appears that State govt. has not taken any decision under 9-F of Maharshi Dayanand University, Act, 1975. The only prayer made in the writ petition is to take decision under 9-F of Maharshi Dayanand University, Act, 1975. CWP No.8166 of 2009 [2] In view of the prayer made in the writ petition, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents-State that a decision in respect to the resolution adopted by the University on 21.7.2007 be taken within a period of two months from the receipt of certified copy of the order by the competent authority. ( Permod Kohli ) Judge 11.08.2010 sd