IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2009 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 912 of 2009(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- DR.VIJOY P.S., PONATH HOUSE KARA PO, KODUNGALOOR. BY ADVS. MR.A.K.ALEX MR.K.P.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENZHIPALAM KOZHIKODE. 2. ADMINISTRATOR, GURUVAYOOR DEVASWAM MANAGEMENT, GURUVAYOOR. ADV. MR.V.KRISHNA MENON FOR R2 MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC FOR CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 912 of 2009 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is an applicant to the post of Lecturer under the second respondent. The Notification was issued on 17.12.2008, as per which four vacancies were notified. Petitioner submitted an application pursuant to the same. The age limit fixed in the Notification is 35 years as on 1.1.2009, which according to the petitioner was not correctly done. It is in these circumstances, he approached this Court seeking for various reliefs. 2. In the statement filed on behalf of the Devaswom, it is pointed out that the Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee after considering the Government order produced by the petitioner as Ext.P9, decided to issue an erratum Notification. Annexure A is the said notification. Going by Annexure A, the upper age limit fixed is 40 years. Pursuant to Annexure A notification, the petitioner has also submitted an application. 3. It is pointed out by the learned standing counsel that so far they have not taken any decision either to accept or to reject wpc:912/2009 2 any application, and processing of the application is yet to take place. Since, the grievance raised by the petitioner has already been met no further orders are required to be issued in the matter. The application submitted by the petitioner will also to be considered in accordance with the stipulations contained in the Notifications. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE bps