1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3433 OF 2009 Chawla Ramesh Kuma (HUF) & Ors. ... Applicants. V/s. Asit C. Mehta Investment Intermediates Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. V.V. Salunke for the Applicants. Mr. A.S.Chitole, APP for the State. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 06th JANUARY 2010. P.C. :- Heard Mr. Salunke, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Applicant. Perused the interim order passed by the Trial Court rejecting the objection to its territorial jurisdiction. 2. From the order itself it is apparent that the objection was raised during the course of recording of evidence. In such circumstances, it would not be proper to interfere with the interlocutory order at this stage. In case the final order in the complaint is adverse to the Petitioner/Applicant, then, while challenging it the Applicant can raise all pleas including that the Trial Court had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try this complaint. All rights and contentions of both sides in that behalf are kept open. 3. The Application is dismissed subject to the above order. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)