( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13586 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2007 Shriram Kishanrao Tambalkar (Kulkarni) APPLICANT VERSUS Jagjeetsingh s/o Jaswantsing Shikri and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. R.K. Ashtekar, advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.B. Patil, advocate holding for Mr. S.M. Godsay, advocate for the writ petitioner. Mrs. S.B. Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, advocate for respondent No.2. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 14th January, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Mr. S.S. Wagh states that he be discharged as another counsel is appointed by the writ petitioner. He is allowed to get discharged. 2. By this application, the applicant, who is intervenor, seeks direction to the City Survey Officer for mutation of his name in the City Survey record. 3. Heard counsel. ( 2 ) 4. The status quo order rendered by this Court in the matter as per order dated 20th February, 2007 is in respect of factum of possession. The status quo does not relate to anything else. It is not necessary to give direction for mutation of the name of the applicant (intervenor). However, legal position as clarified that the status quo order is limited to the question of possession and nothing else. The application is accordingly disposed of. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca13586-09