IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2010 / 13TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 31452 of 2008(T) -------------------------- CMA.14/2007 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, PARAVUR OS.22/2007 of MUNSIFF COURT,ALUVA .................... PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. ABDUL SALIM,S/O. MUHAMMED KOLLAMKUDI KIZHAKKEDATH PARAMBIL HOUSE, EDATHALA KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ABDUL KALAM AZAD @ AZAD, S/O. MUHAMMED, KOLLAMKUDI KIZHAKKEDATH PARAMBIL HOUSE, EDATHALA KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE,ERNAKULAM. 3. ABDUL SATHAR @ SATHAR, S/O. MUHAMMED, KOLLAMKUDI KIZHAKKEDATH PARAMBIL HOUSE, EDATHAL KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. MALATHY, W/O. LATE KARUNAKARAN NAIR, ARAKKAL HOUSE, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, EDATHAL KARA, ALUVA TALUK, 2. GOPALAN NAIR, S/O. KRISHNAN NAIR, ARIMBASSERY HOUSE, EDATHALA KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK. ADV. SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR FOR R1 & 2 SRI.P.VISWANATHAN FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.C.No. 31452 of 2008 --------------------------------------- Dated this 04th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioners are defendants in O.S.No.22 of 2007 of the court of learned Munsiff, Aluva. They suffered an order for temporary injunction on I.A.No.152 of 2007 which was confirmed by appellate court in C.M.A.No.14 of 2007. Judgment of the appellate court is under challenge in this writ petition. Learned counsel for petitioners state that suit itself has been disposed of and hence writ petition can be closed without prejudice to the right of petitioners to urge the grounds urged in the writ petition in the regular appeal. I have heard learned counsel for respondents also. Since suit is disposed of it is unnecessary to retain the writ petition which is in challenge of judgment of C.M appeal confirming temporary order of injunction. Hence writ petition is closed without prejudice to right of petitioners urge all the grounds they have taken up in their pleadings in the appellate court. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-