1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5541/2005 (Dhanraj Panwar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 26.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.D.L.R. Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr.B.L. Bhati, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed in the year 2005 claiming promotion on the post of Teacher Gr.II against the vacancies of the year 1978-79 with all consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner verbally raised the ground that respondents were under obligation to determine year wise vacancies, but vacancies were not determined by the respondents, therefore, petitioner was not considered for promotion. I am unable to accept this ground which is verbally taken by the petitioner at the time of arguments without any foundation in the writ petition. Upon perusal of whole writ petition, it is required to be observed that there is no such ground taken by the petitioner for claiming promotion for want of determination of vacancies of the year 1978-79. It is also very important to observe that 2 petitioner is claiming promotion against the vacancies of the year 1978-79 and this writ petition has been filed in the year 2005. No explanation whatsoever has been given by the petitioner in this writ petition, so also, petitioner is claiming promotion without impleading those junior candidates who were promoted without considering petitioner for promotion. In this view of the matter, no case is made out for interference by this Court. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-