CWP No. 4807 of 2007 Sukhinder Singh and others vs. Chandigarh Administration Present : None for the petitioners Mr. K.K.Gupta, Advocate for the respondents **** On 27.7.2007, this Court had passed the following order:- “Vide order dated 30.03.2007, this Court had stayed the resumption order on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners will deposit Rs. 2,28,34,215/- within four weeks with the respondents, without prejudice to their rights and contentions. Despite the aforesaid statement, no amount was deposited by the petitioners. On an application moved by the applicant-petitioners for grant of extention of time for depositing the aforesaid amount, this Court granted indulgence and vide order dated 3.5.2007, the time was extended upto 15.6.2007 to comply with the order dated 30.3.2007, in relation to deposit of Rs. 2,28,34,215/-. Today, we have been told by learned counsel for the respondents that our orders dated 30.3.2007 and 3.5.2007 have not been complied with as the petitioners have not deposited the requisite amount except Rs. 40 lacs which were deposited even prior to 3.5.2007. Neither the amount has been deposited nor any application has been moved by the applicant- petitioners for extention of time. In such circumstances, we are left with no alternative but to vacate the stay granted in favour of the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. The respondents are directed to return the amount of Rs. 40 lacs deposited by the petitioners within a period of two weeks. List this matter for further hearing on 02.11.2007.” CWP No. 4807 of 2007 [2] On the last date of hearing, counsel for the petitioners had sought adjournment. Today no body is present on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the fact that no amount has been deposited nor any application has been moved by applicant-petitioners for further extention of time, the stay already granted has been vacated. Even in this matter, the revisional authorities have granted time to the petitioners to make the payment but despite that the petitioners failed to make any payment. We find no merits in this petition. Dismissed. (VIJENDER JAIN) CHIEF JUSTICE (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) JUDGE 26.02.2008 'ravinder'