IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10018 of 2009 UTTAM KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on the earlier occasion under Section 498 A of the Penal Code and Section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act was rejected noticing that he had filed a case earlier against the family members of the alleged victim. Learned counsel fairly submits that Manihari P.S. Case No. 178 of 2008 lodged by the petitioner has been found to be false. To that extent, there may be no occasion for this Court to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. The submission of the petitioner that in Manihari P.S. Case No. 178 of 2008, as a matter of fact, during investigation, no signs of fire whatsoever has been found at the place of occurrence when the place of occurrence in both the cases are the same and the allegations are commonly of a fire, is a matter to be appropriately considered in an application for regular bail from the materials in the case diary in Manihari P.S. Case No. 178 of 2008 to be read with the materials in the case diary of the present case, without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is dismissed with the aforesaid observations. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)