IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No.330 of 2006 in First Appeal St.No.20632 of 2005 1. Smt.Pushpa Bahiru Mhaske and others ..Petitioners vs. 1. Mr.Sanjay Sheshrao Haral and another ..Respondents Shri V.B.Rajure for petitioners. CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. 29th January, 2007 29th January, 2007 29th January, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for condonation of 82 days delay. The respondents though served are absent. There is no reply affidavit filed opposing the condonation of delay. We have perused the application and the grounds stated therein. We find that the delay has been properly explained. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.V.K.TAHILRAMANI J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)