C^^y^'f' 1 IN THE HIGHCOURT'QFCHHAT~1~ISGARHATBILASPUR WRFT PETn'ION ( CJ N0,.y^5%2008 r ^s^^^i Lj|g ^s&^ &S^ PETITIONERS .•<'y'' 1) A ^ ^4^> ^^ RESPONDENTS Amit Chandna S/0 Ramsarup Chandna ^ Aged about 34 years, H;No-604,Sector-9 ^ Panchkula-134113, (Haryana) Kaptl-Kanwar , S/o Kanwar Dtiaraln paul Singhi Aged about 33 years | i« H.No- 215, Karol Bagh, Ladhevva!|ti|Ijj NesirDIPS School, ti.;® Jalandhar-144001 (Punjab)r;H Versus a'iti lii !11 */1^ StateofGhhattisgarh ;^ "Throughthe Secretary,. CG ! Niji Ksh^tra Vishwa-viC;l|?||S| 'RegalatoryCcimmission, Eilucation Department^MginfrgtetMJ ';"' %E).K;S. Bhawan, Raipur:(C.Gi)1i:| g| i<2^ Direetpr i C3uruKul Univgrsity C/oRajivMatl-iur;IPS(DGP) SeniorHIG-IO.Sector-lll Sharikar Nagar, Ratpur^€.G) ;;iir!: •1. . '^." ^':v: ^l^ :Direcfor , • ;iH{.^^l^i of^echnolQflV ScS^KHI^SI "^'^'iiii'ii'iyiis •Pandari, Raipyr^C.G) ^^^:^^^gaM^ssy^%S^S;^^i :^'^n^ liBltfi :iSE S. State ofChhattisearh. " Throusli Secretarv. Hieher Education Deoartment. D.K-6. Bhawan. Manta-atava. Raiour IC.G.) ^ WRIT PETIJON UNDER.^Sftte J^ OF THE ^ INDIAFORISSUAMCEOFASUtTABLEWRITORDEROF DlgE@1 TO DOJUSTIGE^NTHE MATTER. .Cl^ B^' r ffl ;!! ir; ^IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (Q No. 3837 of2008 PETmONERS : AinitChandna&anolfaer. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Aemhotri. J. Amil: Present: Shri H.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri A.S.Kachliwaha, Advocate fortherespondentNo. 1. Shri Kshitij Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. Sliri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for tlie respondent No. 3. Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondentNo. 5. OM>ER(ORAL) (Passed on 20"' day of July, 2010) 1. . Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on mstructions, seeks pennission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition if cause ofaction survives. 2. Leamedcounsel appearmgfor^othersidehavenoobjection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Cotisequently, the writ petition is dismigsed as withdi'awn wifh the aforestated liberty. Sd/- Satish K.^gnihotri Judge :.^^ :ff '."s^. 11 1: 1t ^ Ri-! ;?^': e