Cri. Appln. No. 3249/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3249 OF 2011 Brijlal s/o. Takhatmal Valesha, R/o. "Sarala Sadan", Ward No. 1, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar. ....Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for applicant. Mr. G.R. Ingole, APP for State/respondent. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 8th August, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for bail in Cr. No. 167/11 registered in Shrirampur City Police Station for offences punishable under sections 328 of IPC and also for offences under sections 44 (AA), 50 etc. of Food Adulteration Act. The papers of investigation were made available. Both the sides are heard. 2. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by a police officer. On the basis of information received, raid was effected at the business premises of the applicant. He had stored raw mangoes and he was having 105 kg of carbide powder and he was using carbide powder for ripening of mangoes. 4000 kg of ripe mangoes and raw mangoes were Cri. Appln. No. 3249/11 2 also recovered. 3. It is the case of the State that due to use of calcium carbide, the ripe fruits becomes injurious to health and it affects nervous system and it goes up to brain. There is no reason to disbelieve this contention of the State. The applicant is behind bar since 15.6.2011 and it can be said that he must have learnt some lesson due to arrest and due to keeping him behind bar for some period. In similar case, some other accused were granted bail by this Court. So this Court holds that bail can be granted to the applicant, subject to some conditions. 4. So the application is allowed. The applicant is to be released on bail on his furnishing PR and SB of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand) in Cr. No. 167/11 registered in Shrirampur City Police Station for offences punishable under sections 328 of IPC and also for offences under sections 44 (AA), 50 etc. of Food Adulteration Act. He is not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. He is not to commit similar offence. If he is found while committing similar offence, his bail is liable to be cancelled. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/ca3249.11