IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2254 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 7.12.2010 Rameshwar ......petitioner vs. Sh. Sumir Mathur and another ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Petitioner claims to be juvenile though his conviction for an offence under Section 302 in an FIR dated 19.7.1990 has been maintained upto Supreme Court. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus before this Court for consideration of his case as juvenile in terms of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hari Ram vs. State of Rajsthan and another (2009)13SCC 211. The said writ petition was disposed of on 30.7.2010 with the direction to the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the observations made in the case of Hari Ram (supra). Once, the conviction of the petitioner has been maintained upto Supreme Court, the State is not competent to consider the claim of the petitioner that he was juvenile on the date of occurrence. The petitioner has to seek his remedy from the competent Court of law in accordance with law. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 7.12.2010 preeti