IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 460 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3367 OF 2005 (D) (Dagadu Baba Borkut ..vs.. Mah. State Co-operative Cotton Growers Mktg. Federation and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri R.C. Madkholkar, Advocate h/f Shri Suresh Dhole, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 08, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. In the midst of hearing, learned Advocate Shri R.C.Madkholkar holding for learned Advocate Shri Suresh Dhole for the petitioner, states that the appellant shall be satisfied if the court observes that if the appellant prefers a remedy under Rule 46 of the service Rules before the competent authority of the respondent Nos.1 and 2, such authority shall be free to decide the representation/appeal according to law and uninfluenced by the orders passed by the Labour Court, Industrial Court and this Court. 3. With above observations , Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale