$W§L€ 3EN$W g ( \OQd; “T JA C xN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 3 $0 8 /2006 PER ETITION / Smt. Laxmi Dwivedi g W/o— Onkar Nath Dwivedi, .. Aged about 49 years, Irrigation Colony, Kevra Munda Ward, Jagdalpur Distt— Bastar (C.G.) / VERSUS RESPONDENTS /r1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Through: The Secrotary, Departmont of Water Resources , D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralya, Raipur, (C.G.). / 2. The Engineer in Chief Department of water Resources Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) K’ 3. ’I:he Chief Engineer Mahanadi Project, Department of Water Resources, Raipur (C.G.) . The Superintending Engineer Indravati Project Circle, Department of Water Resources, - Jagdalpur, Distt— Bastar (C.G.) l [7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE ' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRI’HS! OR ORDER1S} OR DIRECTIONS) " { - . .. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR a? Q? (Hon. Mr. Jusfice Pritinker Diwaker) . Writ Petition No. 3508 of 2006 PETITEONER Smt. Laxmi Dwivedi. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. ‘5’; Shri Y.C. Sharma counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai PL for the respondent/State. WRIT PETlTiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (03.07.2009) With the consent of the oounsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Chatlenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 8.6.2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by the State Government whereby the petitioner was transferred from the office of Superintending Engineer, indravati Project Jagdaipur to the office 'of Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Ambikapur, in violation of the transfer policy. This Court entertaining the grievance of the petitioner had granted stay in her favour vide order dated 17.7.2006. in View of the fact that the petition was fried on 13.7.2006 and the stay was also granted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer order so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the State Government would be at liberty to pass an order if the administrative exigency so warrants. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed Sdi- Pritinker Diwaker l Judge of.