IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.325 of 2011 Baban Singh Versus The Land Development Bank, Budh Marg, Patna & Ors. ---------------------------------- 2. 15.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Rajesh Prasad Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for the Bank. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that the provident fund dues of the petitioner have already been paid. However, the cheque amounting to Rs.51,513/-, which could not be encashed as the account of the Bank was attached under the orders of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna. However, a fresh cheque would be handed over to the petitioner for the aforesaid amount if an application is filed along with the said unpaid cheque addressed to the Managing Director of the Bank. In case the petitioner makes such an application along with the unpaid cheque, as contained in Annexure 3, a fresh cheque for the said amount would be handed over to the petitioner without delay. Mr. Madheshwar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other post retiral dues have also not been paid to the petitioner. In reply, Mr. Choudhary, learned counsel for the Bank submits that the same shall be paid in chronological order in view of the policy decision taken by the Bank. The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)