IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M- 845 of 2011 Date of Decision: January 21, 2011 Anju Pawar and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case F.I.R. No. 89 dated 18.12.2010, under Sections 326, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Dera Baba Nanak, District Batala. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that role attributed to petitioner no.1 is that she has given lalkara; while role attributed to petitioner no.2 is that he has given CRM M-845 of 2011 dang blow on the waist of the injured. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further argued that injury no.2 which is said to be caused by petitioner No.2 is simple in nature. He has further argued that FIR in question was registered after 60 days from the date of incident and cross FIR was lodged by son of petitioner No.2 against the complainant party. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, has fairly stated that only simple injuries were found on the body of the injured. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. However, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail on furnishing their personal bonds and one surety of Rs.20,000/-each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when they are required by the Investigating Officer. In the event of failure of the petitioners to join the investigation, the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to move this Court for cancellation of bail. January 21, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2 CRM M-845 of 2011 3