1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O.NO.204 of 2009 in M.C.A.ST.NO.918 of 2009 in F.A.NO.82 of 98 Pushpa Shriram Shrirame and anr. .vs. Smt.Manjulabai wd/o Champatrao Malkapure and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.A.V.Bhide, Adv. for the appellants C ORAM : C.L.Pangarkar, J. DATED : 21st April, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. The appellants are granted permission to delete the name of respondent no.2/Balwant. His name be accordingly deleted since no relief is claimed against him. As far as heirs of respondent no.1 are concerned, the learned counsel brings to my notice that appellant no.2 being her grand daughter i.e. daughter of her son, is an heir under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act. In any case, therefore, the appeal cannot abate. If there are any other heirs, the appellant may take necessary steps as and when such heirs are found. 2 The appeal came to be dismissed for non- filing of the paper-book. For the reasons stated in the application, the appeal stands restored to file. The delay stands condoned. JUDGE. chute