IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30180 of 2009 HARE RAM MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 323, 379 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 3(1)(X) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The submission is that the allegation is common with co-accused Dinesh Mahto, who has already been enlarged on bail by the court below. The impugned order of rejection dated 25.7.2009 notices grant of bail to co-accused with common allegations and without any discussion to distinguish the case of the petitioner rejects his prayer not wishing to take any responsibility for the order. The impugned order suffers from arbitrariness. Let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in Bochaha P.S. Case No. 177 of 2008. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Presiding Officer, who has passed the impugned order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)