^»7SMVJ Bhog. Singh S/e Sbri 'Sonodiy Sj.dar, Age. z<-4. ysars,:; Occupa-bioB. •-•-Nil (Ex.Patwarl, 'Cebsll ShalEti) Village Ragja, Selisa-l Sbakti, fli.strict Bilaspur (M.E,) .. Vs. 1. St-ate of Madliya Pradesh through Secretary, Revenue iBparfcment, M.E.State, Valla?bh. Bhawan,' . r''- •Bhopal (M»P.) , y' ,: 2. Sub IDivislonal OfficeT, Shakt 1, Dls-tt. Bllaspur, 5. Gollecfor, Bilaspur M.P. 4.i CommlssiQner,. :' Revenue Eeparfcmen'fc.Bilaspur (M.?.); Appllcan-t. Sf^. •'^ i. gARncna.Aas As' &:l3ove. m 2. EAREIG AES OF;. BESliliEaros s: : As.'atsove..-1 5. PABIICia.ARS : OF; SBE..0iaER;A8A3NS'r::." IGgi APPLICACION, 33.miEE..;, " ;:' ::;,'":^ : ^'i Snti HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRTT PETmON (S) No. 687 of2005 Bhog Singh RESPONDENTS VE R S US State ofMadhva Pradesh & Ofhers. SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Aenlhotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Law^'er forthe State/respondents. (Passedon 06mdayof0ctober, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to flie petitioner, forthwith. Ainit