THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.34718 OF 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent in issuing proceedings bearing B.A.No.1/2008/G1, dated 09-11-2011, under Sections 452 (1) & (2) and 461 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the Act’), as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent not to demolish the existing constructions made by the petitioner near Door No.15-4-242 and 243 situated at G.N. Mada Veedhi, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. The brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the writ petition may be stated as follows: The petitioner is General Power of Attorney (GPA) holder of the aforementioned property. The GPA was executed by his brother on 02-07-2005 for development of land and for contesting any legal complications. He made an applications on 07-05-2010 and 08-09- 2010 to the respondent Corporation seeking permission to construct stilt + 2 floors of the building for residential purpose. The respondent Corporation granted permission vide proceedings dated 13-09-2010 and pursuant to the said permission, the petitioner constructed the residential building. While the matter stood thus, the impugned proceedings were issued by the respondent Corporation stating that the building construction is contrary to the sanctioned plan and that the third and fourth floors were constructed without obtaining permission, and accordingly called for explanation of the petitioner within a period of seven days, failing which, the said constructions will be removed by the Corporation. After receiving the impugned notice, even though the petitioner submitted her explanation on 01-12-2011, the respondent Corporation is trying to remove the structures. Hence, the Writ Petition. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner constructed the building after obtaining permission from the respondent Corporation and that the deviations pointed out in the impugned order are incorrect and hence, he prays to issue a direction to the respondent Corporation not to demolish the existing constructions made by the petitioner. 4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation contended that there are certain deviations in making the constructions and that appropriate decision would be taken in pursuance of the impugned notice and hence, he prays to dismiss the writ petition. 5. The allegation is that the petitioner has constructed additional two floors contrary to the sanctioned plan and hence, the impugned notice was issued. 6. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Corporation to pass appropriate orders on the impugned notice duly considering the explanation of the petitioner within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till a decision is taken and an order is passed, the constructions made by the petitioner in Door No.15-4-242 and 243 situated at G.N. Mada Veedhi, Tirupathi, Chittoor District shall not be demolished. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ K.C.BHANU, J January 06, 2012. KTL