(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4198 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4198 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4198 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 12214 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 12214 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 12214 OF 2005 Smt. Vaishali Shantaram Wagh & Ors ...Applicants Versus M.S.R.T.C. Nasik ...Respondents ..... Shri. R.V. Govilkar, counsel for the Applicants Mr. C.M. Lokesh h/f G.S. Hegde, counsel for Respondents. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants and the Respondents. 3. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the above appeal for admission on 13.12.2005. *****