CRLR 37/2005 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Sri Pankaj Miglani, Adv. for the revisionist. Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State, Sri A.K. Sharma, Adv. for the respondent nos. 2 to 4. This revision preferred u/s 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been directed against the order dated 10.02.2005 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in Misc. Case no. 180/2004 Rashmi Jain vs. Adish Jain by which the Principal Judge, Family Court allowed the interim maintenance to respondent no. 2 and 3 (Smt. Rashmi Jain and Ayush Jain) to the tune of Rs. 2,000/- per month and Rs. 1,000/- per month respectively, (in total Rs. 3,000/- per month) against the revisionist. During the course of the arguments Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that the matter has finally been decided by the Judge, Family Court, Haridwar and the instant revision has rendered infructuous. He prayed that the revision may be dismissed as such. Sri A.K. Sharma, Adv. for the respondent no.2 to 4 also conceded this fact. The prayer is allowed. The revision is dismissed being infructuous. Interim order dated 25.02.2005 passed by this Court, stands vacated. (D.V., J.) 24.10.08 NCM: