HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.929 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.5 of 2006 dated 14.12.2007 on the file of the I-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram, confirming the order passed in M.C.No.27 of 2004 dated 16.12.2005 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vizianagaram. 1st respondent, being the wife of the petitioner herein, filed the aforesaid M.C.No.27 of 2004 seeking maintenance from the petitioner herein. The trial Court, after an analysis of the entire evidence available on record, awarded monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,500/- to the 1st respondent herein from the date of filing of the said petition. Questioning the said order, the petitioner herein preferred Crl.R.P.No.5 of 2006 and the learned I-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram, after re-assessing the entire evidence, dismissed the said revision. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner. While ordering notice to the 1st respondent, this Court, on 19.02.2008, granted interim stay of execution of the impugned order subject to the condition of the petitioner depositing 50% of the arrears of maintenance, within a period of four weeks from that date. The petitioner was further directed to pay at the rate of Rs.1250/- per month before 15th of every succeeding month. The trial Court as well as the revisional Court have discussed the entire evidence available on record and gave a concurrent finding that the 1st respondent is entitled to maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month, which, in my considered view, is just and reasonable. I find no merit in this petition. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 22.04.2010 Gsn.