L IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARI4ATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 0 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE Y.BHASKAR RAO CIVIL RE VlSI 2 25/997 BETWEEN: Bhoja Shetty, S/o.Thaniya Shetty, Age : Major, R/at Gundavu House, Machur Village &Post, Mangalore Taluk,, D.K, PETITIONER (By Sri.M,Vishwajith R 5 i, Adv,) A N D: 1, Smt.Rajani Shetty. 2, Balakrishna Shetty. 3, Prakash Shetty. 4. Latha Shetty, All children of late Damodar Shetty, all are Majors. No.1 residing at 12/C.-34, Brindavan Society. near Sriranga Society, Tnane.400601, No.2 and 3 are residing at Karnala Nivas, Anand Chowk, Koregaon P 0 st and Taluk, Satara Djstrct, Maharshtra, No.4 is !/o Sr 4 diara Shetty, residing at Guruprasad, he1lur Road 0 Karkal P 0 st, D.K, RESPONDENTS (By Srj,O,Shjvaram Bhat, Adv,) ****** ** . , , , 2 : 2 :— Civil Revision Petition is filed u/s,115 of CPC against the order dated 25-.34997 passed in O.S. No.354/1995 on the file of the IV Addi. Civil Judge 1 (Junior Djvision)..& JMFC, Mangalore, This Civil Revision Petition coming on for admission this day, the Court made the following: ORDER The defendant filed this revision assailing the order of court below rejecting the plea to amend the written statement. The suit is filed for the possession by the respondent/plaintiff, Now the amendment sought for by the defendant is to file Form VII under Karnataka Land Reforms Act 1 therefore he is an agricultural tenant. So court has no jurisdiction. Court below after appreciating material foind that in the Form VII disputed land Nurrer not mentioned and therefore it rejected the amendment on the ground if amendment is allowed it will oust the jurisdeton. I do not see any ground to interfere, Hence 1 revision is dismissed. Sd/ JUDGE. vns, R, By C,By’