IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8051 of 2010 Decided on: February 25, 2011. Jagdish Chand Verma ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.AG, for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a PTA teacher. He is aggrieved since he is not accommodated under the fourth respondent by transferring the sixth respondent, who according to the petitioner has been continuing in the school for long years. It is brought to our notice that the sixth respondent is due to retire within six months. It will not be proper to disturb the sixth respondent in these circumstances. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of making it clear that on the retirement of the sixth respondent, the petitioner shall be permitted to join as PTA, till the vacancy is otherwise regularly filled up by appointing fresh recruits. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 25th February, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (vs) Judge. 2