SCA/9831/2007 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9831 of 2007 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= PRADEEP VARSHNEI - Petitioner(s) Versus DR SATYA PRAKASH RECOVERY OFFICER DEBTS & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR MAULIK G NANAVATI for Petitioner(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 1, MR UMANG OZA, AGP for Respondent(s) : 2, MR BHARAT JANI for Respondent(s) : 3, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date : 17/10/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Mr.Nanavati, learned Counsel for the petitioner, SCA/9831/2007 2/2 JUDGMENT states that the basis of the warrant issued by the recovery office was the order of the Recovery Tribunal, which has ultimately recalled its order and, therefore, he states that the petition has become infructuous. 2. Hence, disposed of accordingly. Rule discharged. I.R., if any, vacated. 17.10.2008 (Jayant Patel, J.) vinod