W' DIVISION BENCH: HON-BL£ MR. i3H!RcN&R^ MISHRA & ti, I>L i . »f ^t^» e^.sP^, i.o&Oii/OS (Petition 'ETTTIONER 226 of the Constitution of Indla) Mohd. Sabir. S/o Shekh Buddhu. aged about 58 r»/ „ i /; 11 I, KfO VI Kcmiaana, rosT i-.irari, r.o. \i^ V5 Naryanpur. District Jashpur (C6) 1. State of Chhattisgsrh. Throigh: The Secretary, &.K.S. Bhswan, Raipur (C.6). 2. Superintendent of Poiice. District Joshpur Sf^\ 3. Station House Officer, Police 5tatSon t/-_!..-„: //'/*\ h.un^urj, \^w^, 4. Station House Cfficer'. lics 5tation ?l'-^.i-—i-^~— i^'-j.—:-^.T--.!-—-— //"/*\ raynGi^Gon, uisrr'iCT ^ asnpur ^t?^ 5. Additionai Superintendent of Police, Raigarh //»/*\ (L.aj. MP. Anurag Jhu, Advocate for the petitioner. AAr. UNS Deo. Sovernment Advocate for the State. (13.11.20091 1. On the last date of hearinq, learned counsel for the State was allowed time to seek instructions and make his submission. 2. Mr. &eo, learned counset for the State on instructions fr-om the State authorities submits that Mohd. Rashid has been afrested in connection v with some criminal offence reqistered in Police Station (Sharqhoda and has been sent in iudicial remand to bistr-ict Jail Raiqarh on 09.11.2009 by the Judiciai Ma9istrate 1 Clsss, 6har9hoda. Simi!ariy, Mohd. Sohaii was also arrested on 08.11.2009 and produced in the Court of Sub Divisional AAaaistrate, Sharqhoda cmd he has a!so been sent to jail. 3. In yiew of above submissions by tearned counsel for the State, leamed counsel for the Detitioner does not oress this Detition and accordinalv, 1+ie same is dismissed as not OFsssed. However, the oetitioner is at libertv to oursue other remedies availabie to him under the iaw. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- - RJI. Chandrakar Judge TL