IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 253 of 2009 Between: Gaddam Ellamma W/o. Chinnappa Naidu C/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police Chittoor District Chittoor. 2 The Station House Officer Thavanpalli Mandal P.S. Thavanpalli, Chittoor District. 3 Smt. Kamalakshi W/o. not known to the petitioner R/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. 4 Smt. T.V. Rama Devi R/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. 5 Sri Muragaiah S/o. Gundaiah R/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. 6 Sri Raghavaiah S/o. Sikhamani, Age not known to the Petitioner R/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. 7 Sri Doraiah S/o. Chinnaiah, Age: not known to the Petitioner R/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. 8 Sri Naga Raju S/o. Vakkaiah, Age: not known to the Petitioner R/o. Diguvamagham Village, TV Palle Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.1 & 2 in registering crime pursuant to the petitioner's complaint dt.28-12-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct them to register the crime and investigate into the complaint. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Writ Petition No.253 of 2009 Order: Heard both sides. The only grievance of the petitioner appears to be that, despite a complaint being made by him, no action has been taken by respondents 1 and 2 by registering a crime against the unofficial respondents. It appears, a complaint was lodged by the petitioner, on 28.12.2008 making certain allegations. But, no crime has been registered nor any further action has been initiated pursuant to the said complaint. Therefore, suffice it to close the writ petition with a direction to the official respondents to register a crime pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioner, on 28.12.2008, if not already registered, and proceed further against the unofficial respondents, in accordance with law, to the extent warranted, after conducting necessary investigation. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J Dt.12.01.2009 VGB THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Writ Petition No.253 of 2009 12.01.2009