IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 12795 of 2009 Ms. Meenakshi ...Petitioner Versus Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra and others ...Respondents Present: Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Rana, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. R.N. Raina, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for respondent No. 3. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. The benefit of internal assessment to the petitioner, which was submitted by the College was being denied. The counsel for the University was, accordingly, directed to take into consideration the revised internal assessment submitted by the College whereby the petitioner had been assessed having 10 out of 10 marks. The University has re-considered the case and has now given a result- cum-detailed marks card adding 10 marks of internal assessment to the result in the case of the petitioner. The necessary result-cum- detailed marks card is produced before the Court and the same after perusal is handed over to the counsel for the petitioner. On request made by counsel for the University the earlier result-cum-detailed marks is returned to the University, which is received by the counsel. The relief claimed in the writ petition, thus, Civil Writ Petition No. 12795 of 2009 -2- stands granted. The writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. August 27, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE