C^(?c^-~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WP.NO. "^^ y PETITIONER •-y:.\^'t .^s^y RESPONDENTg ./2003 Krishana Pratap Singh S/0 Brij bahadur Singh, Aged 34years Occupatition sevice presently - waiting for Joining R/0 Mukhana Post bhithikala. Dist- ^^SCc^.} VERSUS 1. State of chhattisgarh Through Commissioner. Collegiate education RaipurfC.G.) 2.' Addl.Director collegiate education Raipur(C.G.) 3. Join Director collegiate education Raipur(C.G) 4. Principal Govt.Post Graduate College Ramanujganj Dist.Sarguja(C.G.) 5. Principal Govt.Post Graduate College Ambikapur Dist.Sarguja(C.G.) 6. Yogendra kumar Bharthia L.D.C. Govt.Post Graduate College Ramanujganj Sarguja (C.G.) fD^' \sA WRITJ'ITITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 311^1 qff W Sf^l 5<l^l ^lf?^f 7^ -llWld<<, »fl1«'i(»,{»t<-iiyy wwir th*ii<n t^ ....£2'.i>.....t:u.:.3^/0' 'W, 200 fec^T' 311^1 TOnw^ite 15/3/2004 Shri Bhupendra Singh, . Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, ^dvocate for fhe petitioner. d» IPanel La\v^-er for the State on adyaace copy. AppUcation for urgent h^ariiig is aUowed. Heard. Shri Siagh subniits fiiaf Division Clerk in P.G. CoUegel, short tmie he was traasferred furtlier subnuts fhat when th. served u a direction is giv coasider the representation. The prayer is not opposejl by tiie State counsel. Havuig considered fhe fa| m.aterial on recoT-rt, in the opiu: cblilld-41'1 'HTR^f ^ fs^ <pi!^.l< ^ sif^pTsn^i tlie petitioner was working as Lower Raaianujagatij and after workiag for jto Govt. P.G. CoUege, Ainbikapiir. He ^ petitioner had gone there to join Ms refused to give fb.e joiiiuig. He m.ade of no avail. Thereafter he filed tlie services, respondent No.4 has| tfae representation, which wa^ petition, which was traasferrejl to fhe State Adimnistrative Tnbunal and reiuam.ed pendiag before i|l Tribunal has now been aboUsli I- aud had not been decided. The State ed. He prays that eilds ofjustice wiU :n to tlie respondents No. 1 and. 2 to •ts aad circuiastances ofthe case and ^on of fhis Court, ends ofjustice would XI-HC-22 an^rqff [<;'fi?fc 311^1 ^w^ ^fe^f ^ T^ -41''41<'l'i1, »fl1*f'16, ('K'll'My an^r ira^? WfCfT ViW^ "WI, 200 f^^T' be served if a direction is representation alongwith a the coiapetent aufhority/re froru today and on such rep| considered and decided b-^ No. 1 aiid 2 ia accordance wifhiu t\vo inontbs froru fhd the grievaiice stfll subsists, afresh. fven to tlie petitioner to nialee a detailed cjopy of the petition aiid this order before :^pondents No.l and 2 zvitliiu 15 days t'esentatiou being Sled,i tlie same shaU be fhe coiapetent authorit',r/rcspondeiits ^vifti law as early as possible preferably date of receipt of the representaUon. If |±ieparties ai-e entitted to file the petition Wifh fhe direction afor Consequenfly, M.W.P. Certi&ed copy as per n cbl-4Td^i TIP:RTf ^ l^sif <f^<$K ^i'sriitnsirisi ;said, this petition is disposed of. p<o. 2811/ 2003 also staitds disposed of. Pes- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^