CRA/1259/2000 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 1259 of 2000 With CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 1265 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== MODI BACHUBHAI SAKALCHAND - Applicant(s) Versus RANCHHODLAL CHIMANLAL -HEIR OF HIRALAXMI & 3 - Opponent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : PARTY-IN-PERSON for Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR DP KINARIWALA for Respondent No(s).: 1, 2,3. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 4. ================================================================== CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 20/07/2005 COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Modi Bachubhai Sakalchand, party-in-person is present and he seeks leave to withdraw the above numbered two Civil Revision CRA/1259/2000 2/2 JUDGMENT Applications unconditionally. He therefore urges to pass appropriate order for withdrawal of both the above numbered revision applications. 2. Mr. D.P. Kinariwala, learned advocate for respondents Nos.1 to 3 has no objection if leave as prayed for is granted. 3. Hence, leave to withdraw the civil revision applications is granted. Both the above numbered Civil Revision Applications stand disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. Rule issued in both the revision applications is discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. (A.M. Kapadia, J.) ... (karan)