IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4092 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 08, 2011 Chander Bhan Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner, Appeals-II, Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. K.S. Cheema, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 27.1.2010 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Financial Commissioner, Appeals-II, Punjab. 2. In a matter of partition, the Financial Commissioner has passed order (Annexure P-4) while observing as under:- “....No party has stated that they should be given specific Khasra numbers to them. However, A.C.Ist grade while framing the mode of partition have given specific Khasra numbers to respondent No.1 only which is against the CWP No.4092 of 2011 [2] principles of partition. A particular co-sharer cannot be given preferential treatment over others when objections have been raised by other co-sharers. Partition has to be affected as per the value and quality of land which has not been properly followed in this case. The counsel for the respondent has failed to rebut these arguments. I tend to agree with the contentions of the petitioner.” 3. Revision petition has been accepted and Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Dasuya, has been directed to frame fresh mode of partition after hearing the parties. The petitioner was respondent No.1 before the Financial Commissioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any illegality in the order, portion of which has been extracted above. 5. No ground for interference in extraordinary civil writ jurisdiction is made out. 6. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) March 08, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?