IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 9, P‘ef-‘. PETITIONER P. a . W“ 'W gm RESPONDENTS y q n; W.P.NO 2002 RAM KHILAWAN SAHU, SON OF LATE SHRI RIKHI RAM SAHU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. LAGE BODSARA TAH JANJGIR DISTT. JANJGIR, CHAMPA (C.G.) VERSUS g? STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH , THE SECRETARY (REVENUE), D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 2) COLLECTOR, JANJGIR, DISTT. JANJOIR, CHAMPA (CO) 3) SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANJGIR, CHAMPA (CO) 4) TAHSILDAR,. DISTT. JANJGIR, CHAMPA, CHHATTISGARH. 5) BUND KUNWAR SATNAMI (SARPANCH) , AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O. NOT KNOWN, R/O. BODSARA, DISTT. JANJGTR, CHAMPA, (CO) 6) LAKHAN LAL SAHU,/ (EX SARPANCH) S/O. / SHRI DUKHURAM SAHU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. VILLAGE ~— BODSARA, ¢ DISTT. JANJGIR, CHAMPA, CHHATTISGARH. 7) Kw SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTT. JANJGIR, CHAMPA (C.G.) MANAGER, SON OF GIRDHARI, CASTE—KHAIRWAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, DILERAM S/O. CHHEDURAM AGED ABOUT 3O YEARS, CHHATRAM S/ O. DAYARAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) NANKI SON OF BIHANU RAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. MOTILAL SON OF SUDHURAM AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, AKSHAY SON OF GIRDHARI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. PANCHRAM, SON OF MANGEL SINGH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. JAGDISH SON OF MURIT RAM, AGED ABOUT 3O YEARS. DHARAM LAL SON OF BIHANU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. KHISHAN SON OF SAKHAN AGED ABOUT 4-0 YEARS. 18) 19) TIJ RAM, S/O. MURIT RAM AGED ABOUT 4O YEARS. MILAN SON OF SAKHAN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 20) PAT TAM, SON OF DAYAFAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. \Q—‘N 21) JANT RAM, SON OF BUDAL AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS CASTE—SAHU. 22) BHAKHALA, SON OF KUNJRAM 1‘ SATNAMI, AGED ABOUT 62 M‘ YEARS. FROM SLNO. 8 To 22 ARE R/o. VILLAGE— BODSARA, DISTT. JANJG,/HAMPA, C.G. / PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2227 OF THE CONSTYIUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT,ORDER OR DIRECTION, WHICH THE HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT. ‘ ’ ;3C (£9 WWWWWa, W %3 www/w ’F‘ixm W§@ @‘amgéwr aré‘a‘é’ia W (FW) ¥ wmzW aw E V 16/4/2a03 ~‘.’ ‘ aqréir m WW? i ma? Wm ‘a‘mé, ‘ iW! WWW may??? i? W fww $7? $i%a waif? " Shri V.K. Pandey for theépetitioner. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawalj Dy. Advecat€ General, for the State. Heard. ThiS petition has bean f1 ed by the petitioner for setting aside the allotment of laixd 01 lease in favour of respondents no.9 to ‘22. It is Submitted Hat the allotment made in theiy favour ie illegal and contrary 0 law; It is further submitted that the petitioner has tiled t e representations {Annexures— Pf5 and 13/6) to the authoriti s but the same have not been decided so far. 1t is also su tted that even the Secretary (Revenue)/respondent no.1 lad issued instructions to the Coileetor/respondent no.2 to ecide the matter. Having considered the ts and circumstances of the ease and material on record, in the opinion of this Court, ends of justice Will serve a direction is given to the petitioner to submit a copy the petition with annexures alongwitii the copy of the der passed today before the Coilectorf respondent no.2, after hearing the parties shall decide the matter as early as ssibie preferably within four months. 12/2000 50,000, GRPRJ—FS/35O w b i c i f ‘ W o am‘m mm (,V an? ew‘m $3M A9~S COnSequenth M W P NO 1518/02 and I A NO 4542/09 stand dlSposed of Cerniiéd copy as par rul . e. WW W WW wmg M \A”9 K..H.I..W../§k_w2w aw??? §€€§<Wi§a§a> gw *é‘efga mg f L i wwlqf$igf {WW With the aforesaid ob£ervations, this p6titi0n is disposed of at this stage