‘ 1‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘T’I‘ISGARH : BILASPUR l Wn't Peh'u'on C No. 283A of 2008 i Petitioners 1. Md. Alif, aged a 'out 47 years, S/o Late Shri 1 Zamel Ahmad, l/o Behind Maszid, Chota Para, Raipur Tehail 85 District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Md. Naeem, about 40 Late ‘ WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF‘ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihou‘i J.) Shn' Sunjl Otwani, Advocate with Shn' Sushobhit Singh, Advocatef for the petin’oners. t Shli Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the respondents] State. i Shri Ayaj Naved, Advocate for the Chhattisgarh State Industrial? x j Development Corporation Ltd. o R D E R [oran (Passed on this 17th day of July, 2009) Heard. 1. Shri Ayaj Naved, learned counsel appearing for the Chhattisgarh; State Indusu'ial Development Corporation Ltd., on the basis of the retuln dated 2.3.2009, hled in Writ Petition (C) No: 2688/2008, submits that the Special Secretary, Government ofi Chhattisgarh, Oommerce and Industries Department, byyletteri; I Shri Zameel Ahinad, R/o Behind Maszid, Chota Para, Raip‘ur, Tehsil & District Raipux X (C.G.) l 3. Saheena Begam, aged about 39 yeats, W/o .a x I Late Shn' Shakel Ahmad, R/o Behind Maszid MW; E Chota Para, Raip'ur, Tehsil an Distn‘ct Raipm: I (C.G.) ; 4. Md. Salem, aged about 42 years, S/o Late Shri Zamel Ahmad, R/o Behind Maszid, Chota Para, Raipur, Tehsil & Disnict Raipur (C.G.) ; Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Collector, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sub—Divisional .O$cer/Land Acquisition Ofdcer, Tehsil 8r. District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Dixector, Directorate of Industlies, Pandati,‘ Raipur, Chhattisgarh. \A dafited 15th September, 2008 has infomed the‘Conector, Raipur Ithfat the Government has taken a' decisi n nOt to acquim the land of villages Dhansuli and Sankri for cstablishment of upralc park ‘ § S ‘Shm Alok Baksh1 learned counsel appealing for the respondentSIState submlts that thc appmpnate newcatlon, de notifymg the acqmsmon of land 1n legard to the nonhcanon m questlon, shall be 1ssued by the Collector, Ralpur, Immedlately In v16w of the foregomg, acconimg to learned counsel appearing for the pentoners, nothmg su1v1ves ‘ m th1s wnt petmon for adjudication. The petition, is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No order asto costs. Sd/— ,Satish K. Agnihotri 7 Judge 111 Raipur distn'ct. i r i i i :‘M \