IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION No.449 OF APPLICATION No.449 OF APPLICATION No.449 OF 2006 The Sangli Bank Ltd. .... Applicant angli Bank Ltd. .... Applicant angli Bank Ltd. .... Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. Smt. Malti T. Kudale & Ors. ... Respondent Malti T. Kudale & Ors. ... Respondent Malti T. Kudale & Ors. ... Respondent Mr. P. P. Kakade, advocate for applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for respondent, though served. The learned counsel for appellant seeks time to file affidavit of service within a week. 2. Perused the Civil Application. By this Civil Application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay. For the reasons set out in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no cause of inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a). [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]