IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20855 of 2009 GUDDU KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Distant or near relation of Khalil Mian and Alimun Nisa were there with the complainant, as there was talk to reconcile the differences which was prevailing in between Khalil Mian and Alimun Nisa. Petitioner was one of them who were taking initiation to reconcile the differences and in that continuation all the accused persons came to the complainant but there they quarreled and it is said that after assault some articles including five files were taken away by this petitioner while submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no concern either with the complainant or his relation and only to otherwise pressurize him, he has also been implicated in the case in the difference in between the wife and husband including complainant basing which petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and - 2 - circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in Tr.no. 1893 of 2008 arising out of Complaint Case No. 261© of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI