cox HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) WRIT PETITFON No. 2265 of 2005 i f Mr Gautam Bhadun counsel for the petitioners None for other respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF TH CONSTITUTION OF INDIA oRoER (28.04.2009) It is unfortunate that on the last date of hearing none appeared for the respondents though the matter was was called twice. Even today none appears for them when the matter is called out. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 23.4.2005 passed by the Additional District Judge (FTC) Raipur in Misc. Appeal No. 14/2005 affirming the order dated 21.2.2005 passed by the trial Court refusing to grant infunction in favour of the plaintiffs. iv, E PETITIONERS ’i. V Ramadhar Shukia aged aboutr 61 PLAINTHFFS years, S/o late Gedu Prasad Shukia 2. Ku. Roshani Shukla, aged about 35 years, daughter of Ramadhar Shukla both reSIdent of Pahan Chauk Ralpur TahSIl and District Ralpur CG if VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Dashrath Sahu, aged about 40 DEFENDANTS years, 2. Ramnaresh Sahu aged about 36 years Both sons of late Shri Nanhelal Sahu, resident of Indore Sev Bhandar, Pahari Chauk, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur, CG. . (3x 5/ v2.— . Counse! for the petitioners submits that the order of the trial Court as we" as of the appeiiate Court are in complete vioiation of the principies governing the law of injunction andvthe courts beiow should haVe granted the relief as prayedfor. This Court on 15.6.2005 had granted status quo in favour of the plaintiffs. The said order is operating for more than four years and no useful purpose would be served in varying the said order. Accordingly, the order dated 15.6.2005 passed by this Court to continue till the final disposal of the suit. Suit is said to be pending since 2004. The Court below is directed to dispose of the suit as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Due co- early disposal of the suit. With the observations made above, the petition is disposed of. operation to the Court below is expected from the parties for Sdh Pritinkel‘ Diwaker Judge