L-/) s IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. '^u '" /2011 PETITIONER Ramchandra Dhoba, aged about 60 years, Son of Shrl Satyanand Dhoba, presently working as "Head Master" at Govt. Primary School- Pihra, Block & Tahsil- Baramkela, District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS y- •^•"-^" .;-?' /l. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Department of School Education, y'..tf;^'-..-•"" ^ Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, 2. The Collector (Schedule Trlbe Welfare Branch) Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) , ^.^w f>7:-%;^^-" 3. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A - 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WK[T(S)/ ORDERfSI OR DIRECTIONfSl ETC: •<>• H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGABH : BSLASPUR WRiT PETITiON (S') N0. OF 2011 RESPONDENTS Ramchandra Dhoba Versus State of Chhattisaarh & Others (Writ Petltion under Articie 226 ofthe Constlti Sinaie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanih '/ ^ Present:- Shri Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubev, Govt, Advocate for the State. isnFR/nRAi ^ \3—?;—'s \. \\^~l\f~\l^;° .i'P-s^-.-=-.s,'^ ^r\ •'•hi<-- r^"^r^ ^^•..* r-.? ^,fi.'^\s OFS-l 'l \ i,;''assea on in's u^'~ osy o? iviay, ^ui "i.) 1. Heard iearned counsei for the parties. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructlons, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petjtion on merits at this stage, and prays for withdrawa! of this petition with iiberty to make a representation to the State authoritles 'n the light of the circuiar dated 05.01.2011 for arant of reaular pay-scais w.e.f. the initia' date of aDoointment. 3. Shri Dubey, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that if a representatlon is made, the same shaii be consldered and declded within a perlod of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in the light of the sbove-stgted circuiar. !n view of foregoing. the petitlon is dismlssed as withdrawn with the above-stated iiberty. !t is expectsd that the concemed authorities wou!d consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within a Deriod of six weeks from the date of recsipt ofthi repi'esentation along with a copy of this order. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge