1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF OF OF MOTION NO.3924 OF MOTION NO.3924 OF MOTION NO.3924 OF 2006 inin in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2179 of 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.2179 of 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.2179 of 2006 inin in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2006 APPEAL NO. OF 2006 APPEAL NO. OF 2006 The The The Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner of of of Income Tax II Mumbai Income Tax II Mumbai Income Tax II Mumbai ...... Appellant Appellant Appellant vs vs vs Shri Shri Shri Kewal K.Suri Kewal K.Suri Kewal K.Suri ...... Respondent Respondent Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango Mr.A.D.Kango Mr.A.D.Kango with with with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant Ms Ms Ms Beena Beena Beena Pillai for Respondent Pillai for Respondent Pillai for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND R.S.MOHITE, R.S.MOHITE, R.S.MOHITE, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007 : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007 : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1.1.1. There is a delay of about 41 days. In the There is a delay of about 41 days. In the There is a delay of about 41 days. In the affidavit affidavit affidavit supporting the motion cause shown is supporting the motion cause shown is supporting the motion cause shown is sufficient sufficient sufficient cause. Considering the same the delay cause. Considering the same the delay cause. Considering the same the delay [ isisis condoned. Office to register the appeal. condoned. Office to register the appeal. condoned. Office to register the appeal. (F.I.Rebello, (F.I.Rebello, (F.I.Rebello, J) J) J) (R.S.Mohite, (R.S.Mohite, (R.S.Mohite, J) J) J) 2