IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3727 of 2010 1. DEO NARAIN CHOUDHARY, S/O LATE KAPILDEO CHOUDHARY. 2. BHARTI DEVI, W/O DEONARAIN CHAUDHARY BOTH RESIDENT OF SUPUAL WARD NO.4 (KISHUNPUR ROAD), P.O.-SUPUAL, P.S.- SUPAUL, DISTRICT-SUPAUL. …………PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. MR.KUMAR RAVI, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL. …………OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 4 15.09.2011 From Annexure-B to the show cause it appears that the Collector has considered the representation of the petitioners and passed orders disbelieving their claim on facts. Petitioners have a remedy before the competent court of law to challenge the said order in accordance with law and get their title decided in respect of the property which is in dispute. No contempt lies in the matter. The application is therefore disposed of. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)