IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17616 of 2008 Uma Shankar Prasad, Son of Late Amar Prasad, Resident of Village Near Amin Lodge Chandmari P.S. Motihari, District – East Champaran. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Secretary Personnel Claim Fixation Cell Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad Bihar. 6. The Executive Engineer Irrigation Mechanical Division Gaya, District – Gaya. 7. The Executive Engineer, Central Stored and Camp Division Barwadih Camp, Deo District – Aurangabad. 8. The Treasury Officer Gaya, District – Gaya. 9. The District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya, District – Gaya. 10. The Accountant General, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. --------------- Respondents ---------------------------------- 3 13.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Himanshu Kumar, learned A.C. to Government Advocate No. 3, appearing on behalf of Respondent/State and Sri Ranjan Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. Learned counsel for Respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Sri Himanshu Kumar, submits that such fact has been stated in paragraph no. 5 to 8 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent/State. Similarly, Sri Ranjan Kumar submits that statement made in paragraph no. 6 & 7 of the counter affidavit of Respondent/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, is indicative of the fact that grievances have already been redressed. The statement made by learned counsel for the 2 Respondents was not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of stand taken by the parties, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)