IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13057 of 2010 RAMESH CHANDRA SINGH SON OF SRI RAGHUBAR DYAL SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAKHARA, POLICE STATION – MASAURHI, DISTRICT - PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, BISHWESHRAIYA BHAWAN, PATNA. 4. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WORKS CIRCLE - 2 BARRAK HARDING ROAD, PATNA. 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WORKS DIVISION -2 HILSA, DISTRICT – NALANDA. 6. DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. 7. TREASURY OFFICER, SUBTREASURY MASAURHI DISTRICT – PATNA. 8. DISTRICT PROVIDFUND OFFICER, NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF 9. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 02. 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of December 2009 as Correspondence Clerk from the office of the respondent no. 5, the retiral dues of the petitioner have been sanctioned, however, on the old scale of pay. Petitioner is entitled to get revised pensionary benefits in terms of the Government Resolution contained in notification no. 630 dated 21st of January 2010, which has not been done 2 despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that representation filed by the petitioner is not clear with regard to the claims of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 with a copy to respondent no. 5. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall dispose of the claims of the petitioner by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)