IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30709 of 2011 1. Raushan Kumar, son of Shatrughan Yadav 2. Raushan Kumar, son of Aghori Yadav Both resident of village – Inarwa, P.S. – Chailarh, District – Madhepura. ------------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ******* 03. 28.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhepura (Chailarh) P.S. Case No. 114/2011 for offences under Sections 147/148/149/323/341/384/504 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case arising out of petty dispute relating to some demand of Rangdari in lieu of work being done by contractor. Submission is that in fact due to political rivalry in two villages case has been instituted and informant himself has in his further statement made contrary to the earlier statement recorded in F.I.R. Moreover, these two petitioners have no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura (Chailarh) P.S. Case No. 114/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)