-^-:-^~?T"*> HIGH COXJRT OF CHHATnSWkRH. BU^ySPUR W.P.lSltTo. 6807of20W PBTITIOMBR RESPONDBNT8 1 Churaniani Rattiore, ayed. about 38 years, S/o Shri Udhav Lal Rafhore, Assistaat Teacher Govemineut Prunary School Rajiv Nagar (Thusekela), Block Kharaia, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) yersus State of Ctthattisgarh, Through ; Secretaty, Departatent of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipiu- (C.G.) 2 District Education Of&cer Rai^rh, Distt. Ra^arh (C.G.) 3 Block Bducation Officer, Block Kharsia, District - Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petltion under Artlde 226 ofthe CotiatituUQn ofl^iittl ¥- Appeataace: Shri Aoil Mouiya, counsel for the petitiDucr. Shri Pradeep Siagh, I^nel Lawyer, for the State on advaace copy. OR&LOBDBR (16.11.2007) Sin*IL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for the petittoaer subnuls that fhe petitioner has passed B.T.I. exainiDation on his own expenses, therefoie, he is entifled to receive two advance iacrements according to ciroulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that iu inaay identical niatters, the petitiQns have been aUowed in terms of fh.e order passed ia the case of Yashwtw.t Kumw Bhafadwcil Vs. JKbtnteIpciI Cwporatton, flwo cuid anoffier /2Q06 ff8 »SPJK-<XS 96). He submits lliat fhe case of the petitioner issquarely covered by the said Judgm.ent. This legal position is not disputed by thc leamed counsel for the State. Howeyer, he submits that fhe order may be passed in terms ofthe said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regardlng petidoner's such quaUflcation. Accordingfy, fhis writ petition is aUowed ia terms of the ^oiAei passed ia case of Yaskuiant Kumar Bha.rddwaj Vs. Mwwdpal Carporation, Durg and another (Supra} subject to ®^^, ,A ~'<^v ^lf"^ '\ ^ %te®®i.1 g '<"^^iS ^ W.P.fSlNo. 6807 of 2007 verification of the facts as to whether the petttioner had acquired B.T.I. Exanunation Certt&cate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aad fwfher whefher he has been paid two advaace m.crcmeuts or not The petition stands finatty disposed of. No ordcr as to costs. ———_._ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatU V-