IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1091 of 2005 Date of decision: September 18, 2006. Ramanjit Kaur & Anr. ...Petitioner(s) v. Partap Singh, Inspector ...Respondent(s) Present: None. Surya Kant, J. (Oral) On September 27, 2005, notice was directed to be issued to the respondent to show cause as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 be not initiated against him. However, the notice could not be issued as no process fee was filed. On 16.5.2006, one more opportunity was given to the petitioners to file the process fee within one week so that notice could be issued to the respondent. The Office has again reported that no process fee has been filed, therefore, notice, as directed by this Court, could not be issued to the respondent. It appears that either the petitioners' grievance has been redressed or they are otherwise not interested to pursue this petition. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a fresh petition taking into consideration the later events, if any, and if so required or desired. Rule discharged. September 18, 2006. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge