IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 929 of 2008 Pramod Dobhal & others … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ...Respondents Mr. R.C. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 3. None for respondent No.4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat,J. Mr. R.C. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against all the petitioners before the Nayab Tehsildar/Officer of the Revenue Police on 14.12.2008 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, writ petition is dismisses as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 24.11.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat,J.) 17.02.2009 V.K.