IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7422 of 2011 KAUSHAL SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07.04.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed for bringing this fact on record that one FIR named accused Rajesh Sharma who had participated in the alleged crime by making his presence on the place of occurrence has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this Court vide order dated 06.04.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No.8550 of 2011. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for the informant. Although, learned counsel appearing for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that a threat was given by the petitioner to the deceased from jail and the aforesaid threat converted into reality, and furthermore, petitioner carries chequered history of criminal cases, but considering this aspect of the matter that the person who has participated in the alleged crime has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by another bench of this Court I think it proper to release the petitioner, namely, Kaushal Sharma on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, District-Aurangabad in connection with Goh P.S. Case No.141 of 2010. It is made clear that after release of the petitioner if any complain is made by the informant or his family members or witnesses of this case either before the police or before the concerned court, the bail of the petitioner may be cancelled by the learned court below after verification of truthness of the above stated complain. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)