IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO. 1280 OF 2005 Ashok D. Patil. ...Petitioner. Vs. Swastik Engg. Works. ...Respondent. .... Mr. Vasant Ambekar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.I. Kazi with Mr. Anees Kazi and Mr.V. M. Parkar for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. May 2, 2005. P.C.: At the hearing of this petition, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submitted that since the reference has been restored to the file of the Labour Court after the review was allowed, the Petitioner would seek to pursue the main reference which is now pending decision before the 10th Labour Court, Mumbai. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, however, prayed that the Petitioner may be permitted to lead additional evidence before the 10th Labour Court. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent-management has no objection. In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with the direction that it would be open to the Petitioner to lead such additional evidence as the Petitioner may seek to lead in support of his claim before the 10th Labour Court at Mumbai. The Labour Court is requested to expedite the disposal of the reference and to endeavour to do so on or before 31st December 2005. Since no other point is pressed, the petition is accordingly disposed of. .......