BA-782-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.782 OF 2011 Umed Deraj Visaria ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ Panvel Police Station ... Respondent Mr. Priyotosh Tivari, i/b. Mr. A.M. Saraogi, with Mr. Paras Vira for the Applicant. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 10 TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Vira, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, and Mrs. Shinde, the learned APP for the Respondent. 2. I have gone through the First Information Report and glanced through the copy of the Charge Sheet that has been annexed to the Bail Application. A reading of the F.I.R. shows that there exists a prima facie case against the Applicant. The emphasis of the learned Advocate for the Applicant is on the fact that there is no corroboration to the version of the First Informant. After considering all the relevant aspects of the matter, since the Charge Sheet has already been filed and since the trial can be expeditiously held, it would be proper to make the trial time bound, instead of releasing the Applicant on BA-782-11.sxw 2 Dixit bail at this stage. The prayer for bail can be considered if the trial is not over within the stipulated time. 3. The Bail Application is rejected. 4. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial, and in any case, complete the same by 30th August, 2011. 5. Liberty to apply afresh for bail should the trial be not over by that time. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]