IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20916 of 2011 Mukhiya Yadav @ Pradeep Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being Dewar of the deceased is languishing in jail custody since 1.1.2011 in a case registered under sections 304B, 201/34 of the IPC. The dead body of the deceased was recovered in course of investigation and annexure 2, typed copy of the post mortem report, reveals that cause of death of the deceased was asphyxia. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation witnesses stated that prior to the alleged occurrence a quarrel had taken place between the deceased and her husband. It appears from the first information report that marriage of the deceased had taken place in the year 2007 whereas she died in the year 2010 and between the aforesaid period, she gave birth to a female child. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, particularly, this aspect of the matter that in course of investigation not a single witness has stated any specific overt-act against the petitioner, let the petitioner, Mukhiya Yadav @ Pradeep Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Deepak Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jehanabad in Pali P.S. Case no. 62/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)