IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 374 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- GIDC Versus NARULA DYEING & PRINTEING WORKS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YF MEHTA for Petitioner MR GT DAYANI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 27/07/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It is fairly stated at the Bar that the original civil suit from which this appeal arises is filed in 1992 and the impugned order is passed in October 1993 against which no interim order is obtained in this appeal. It is submitted that the suit is ripe for hearing and disposal in the trial Court and it should be disposed as expeditiously as possible. The parties have expressed their readiness and willingness to proceed with the suit without causing any unnecessary delay. It is also stated that, therefore, it is not necessary to decide this appeal on merits. 2. It is, therefore, ordered, by consent, that the original Civil Suit No.5209 of 1992 pending before the learned City Civil Judge, Ahmedabad, shall be heard and disposed as expeditiously as possible and preferably by the end of this year. The parties shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. With these observations, this appeal is disposed with no order as to costs. Sd/- (KMG Thilake) $$$$$$$