IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.61119-M of 2006 Date of Decision:- 06.07.2007 Darshan Kumar & ors. ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.H.S.Rakhra, Advocate vs. State of Punjab & anr. ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Vishavjit Kaur, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of F.I.R.No.9 dated 12.1.2005 under Sections 325/323/149 IPC registered at Police Station Rampura, District Bathinda. The aforesaid F.I.R is outcome of an unfortunate matrimonial dispute between the sister of respondent No.2-the complainant and her the then husband i.e. the petitioner No.1. It is stated that the said dispute has been amicably resolved by the parties and a decree of divorce by mutual consent has also been passed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The aforesaid plea taken by the petitioners is not disputed by learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant. Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, learned DAG, Punjab, on instructions from H.C.Chaman Lal, further informs that an untraced report has been Crl.Misc. No.61119-M of 2006 -2- prepared which is likely to be accepted very soon. Since in view of the stand taken by the prosecution itself, the FIR is likely to be cancelled, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly, however, with liberty to the petitioners to get the same revived, if so required. July 06, 2007 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE