IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THIS THE 9th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010 W.P.No.21717 of 2009 Between: Smt Pallala Venkata Ratnamma ... PETITIONER(S) and The Tahsildar, Vinjamuru, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District and others …RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.21717 of 2009 ORDER: Petitioner states that her mother is the owner of an extent of 48 square yards of land in Sy.No.775 of Vinjamuru Village and that the same was settled upon her through document dated 13.07.2009. She contends that the respondents are trying to interfere with her possession over the land without any basis. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and the learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat. The learned Standing counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing for the second respondent has placed before this Court, the copies of orders passed by the first respondent directing the eviction of the petitioner and 7 others from Grama Kantam land and the consequential panchanama dated 07.09.2009. He further states that the petitioner and others were already evicted by the aforesaid orders. The petitioner is also said to have filed a representation dated 25.08.2009 alleging that her rights have been adversely effected by the actions of the Panchayat Secretary and his subordinates. In view of this development, once it emerges that the petitioner has been evicted from the land in question, this Court cannot exercise its writ jurisdiction to put her back in possession. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the action of the respondents in evicting her from the land in question she can approach the Civil Court seeking remedy. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for enforcing of her rights. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 9th January 2010 CVRK