1 wp4385.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4385 OF 2011 [ Dr. Dattatraya alias Dattashastri Bhaskarrao Gavhale vs. Surekha w/o Dattatraya Gavhale ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. M.K. Goyanka, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to Para-4 of the impugned judgment and submitted that the findings recorded therein are perverse and contrary to the facts brought on record. According to the Counsel for the petitioner, such observations would come in the way of the petitioner and also looking to the source of income, it is not possible 2 wp4385.11 for the petitioner to make the payment of Rs.1500/- per month to the respondent-wife. 2. Upon hearing the Counsel for the petitioner, I do not think any reason to interfere in the impugned order. The view taken by the trial Court is a reasonable view. If any observations are made by the trial Court while passing the impugned order, those are only for deciding the application for maintenance. It is clarified that, those observations will not come in the way of the petitioner at the time of final hearing of the proceedings which are pending before the trial Court. Writ Petition stands rejected. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11