a coUm OF JUDLCATURh. AT BILASpg‘cxLHiATmISGMH Wrlt Petltlcn No¢Jé3Zo£ ZOOI. (W‘Shamsher Bahadur singh Son o£ late Shrl Ran Bahadur Singh, aged about d/ég years, Ass15tant Statistical WO££icer (unéer sugnenSlon), Distt. 9Plarmlng & Statistics OI£1ce, Kawardha, Distt. Kawardha, present re51dent hoxme of Shrlvastava, near Khandare Paths Clinic, Anand Nagar, Post O££ice Nihartal, Distt.Jab'alpur ..— i—‘u..__— ~.—_..._ 1N T ’Ih HIG pmxTIoNEg 5 M.P. VhR$US .—..-__—— (l) State of Chhattlsgarh Through: Secreaary, lannlng & St atistics , Mantralaya, D.K¢S a Bhawan Raipur (C.G.).a (2) Dlreccor, Planning & Statistics, Mahlla Polytechnic Bulldlngmenslon Qada’ Bairan Bazar, Ralpur (C«G.) (3) S.R.Patel, Distto Planning & Statistical Of£icer, (By name) Through : Secretary, Planning & Statistics, Mantralaya, D¢K.S. Ehawan, Raipur (C,G.) w, R AEICLE 226/227 OF THE CONsTlTUTxog OF INDI-A FOR CESSUING WRITS lN‘THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, ljéglgDN’LUS AND FOR OTHERS A??ROPRIATE DIRECTIONS : WRIT PETXT ION UNDE 5....contdn... ‘ Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Goverm nent Advocate, for the respondents. While serving as Assistant Statistical omcer in the omce of & Statistical Omce at Kavardha , an 'respondent No.3 the District Planning order of suspension was issued on 29.5 .2000. The pe1itioner approached the State Administrative Tribunal. Hm vever, no progess was made in the proceeding. In the meantime, the Stat: : Administrative Tribunal wceased to function for some time. It was dmir1g that time that this writ petition p under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India was hled by the d that as on this date, the Tribunal is functioning. This fact is not disputed. The petitioner submits that since he not be sent back to the Tribunal and that the matter may now be e cle 226 of the Constitution, in as Court has ample power to do so. petitioner on 31.8.2001. It may be sta has already approached this Court, he of extraordinary jun'sdiction under much as according to the petitioner, l circumstances, this Court may ' e could also be examined by the I may say that in some excepti also entertain the petition which oth ‘ ed on‘merit by this‘Court in exercise XI~HG22 W{33% ma ‘81 2w . emawl En? W 31W aWI maxW WWW & Tia?m ég Wm WW Ef‘éa 20.9.2001 v The pstitioner Shamshcr Bahadur Singh in parson. XI—HIGZZ ’ x m QWa‘ égm a 2% ma Wm 3W1 sqiésw 31 was aféa 3W1 mmW WIW % um WI ” ii?W A. Statc Administra1ive Tribunal. In the instant case, peiition was $cd before the State Administrau’ve Tribunal on 15.5.2001 and the same is still pending befora the said authority. Imust state here that the State Administxative Tn'bunal has been set up for specihc p 036.5 No doubt, the case ofthe petitioner would come especially wi ' the purview of the jurisdiction of ' the SAT. It seems that the petitioner f havm' g some apprehension that disposal of the matter may be delayed it is to be examined by the learned .1 < Tribunal. In my view, he does not nee to hale such apprehension. Even ‘ @ontrary at this CoJrt AWL t0 wise, present High _ expedite disposal thousands of cases w1ich are already pending before it. 5‘ . In fact, disposal of this matter can be expedited before the Tribunal. A \«s gievance has also been expressed that the petitioner though he has been under suspension for more than one year, he has been paid only subsistence allowance @ 50%. This aspect,; in my view can be looked into ;immediately by the learned Tribunal. [n the few facts and circumstances that I have recorded, I am of the opinion that this petition should be itself with direction the shall the disposed today a that petitioner pursue matter which is already pending before the tribunal. WeW This petition is disposed of with the direction aforesaid. C.C. today. w\_ Sdl- Chief Justice ‘ W 4 ~ "\ XI—HG‘zz W W, WWI—5;,W 3 “W W 200 ma W an 311WW fa‘W mm WEE 1:12:73 311W W %Wm \ A copy ofthis order be placed before the learned Tribunal afafor x doing needful.