IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 30068 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ LILLY THOMAS @ ELIZABATH, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.THOMAS MATHEW, KUNNEL HOUSE, CHETHY P.O., PERUNNERMANGALAM MURI, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR SRI.LAJI SAM ZACHARIAH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. FRANCIS, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.LATE ANGELOSE, KUNNEL HOUSE, CHETHY P.O., PERUNNERMANGALAM MURI, MARARIKULAM NORTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARARIKULAM POLICE STATION, MARARIKKULAM, CHERTHALA. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARARIKULAM POLICE STATION, MARARIKKULAM, CHERTHALA. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R2 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SALIM P.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ======================== W.P(C).No.30068 of 2007 ======================== Dated this the 16th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this court alleging that the first respondent in disregard of Ext.P2 judgment of the civil court is causing obstruction to the petitioner in her enjoying her property comprised in Sy.No.155/2A/2 of Mararikkulam North Village. When she comes to that property, the first respondent is threatening and harassing her, it is submitted. 2. In view of Ext.P2 judgment of the civil court, the petitioner can seek further reliefs from that court by filing an execution petition, if the first respondent is acting in violation of the said judgment. The civil court has ample powers to address the police also, if necessary, to extent necessary police assistance to enforce the orders of the civil court. WP(C) 30068/07 -: 2 :- In view of the above position, the writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner. K.Balakrishnan Nair, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 17/1