IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2008 / 4TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2931 of 2008(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M/S.SUPERPLASTRONICS (P) LTD. VII/47-A96 INTEGRATED SERVICE COMPLEX PUTHIYA ROAD JN,UDYOGMANDAL-PO,KOCHI REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY K.T.BABU. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. COMMERICIAL TAX OFFICER COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, N.PARAVUR. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR (IN) COUNTER NO.4 WALAYAR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.2931 of 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Detention of a consignment of colour television sets transported by the petitioner is under challenge and Ext.P1 is the order issued. The irregularity noticed is that the duplicate copy of the invoice for transportation did not accompany the consignment. Petitioner has produced the duplicate copy of Ext.P2, which is stated to have not accompanied the consignment at the time of detention. Petitioner also submits that it is a registered dealer and the details of which are also mentioned in Ext.P1 order of detention itself. 2. In view of this, I direct that on the petitioner producing a duplicate copy of Ext.P2 and also a certified copy of registration certificate, the goods detained under Ext.P1 will be released to the petitioner on their executing a bond for the amount mentioned in Ext.P1, without sureties. Thereafter adjudication will be continued and the parties will be governed by the order to be passed. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE csl