1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5317 OF 2009 Shri Umesh Shahajirao Ghogare .. .. Petitioner v/s. The Collector, Pune District, Pune & ors. .. .. .. Respondents Mr.P.D. Dalvi for Petitioners. Mr.V.S. Masurkar, GP with Mr.V.P. Malvankar, AGP for Res.Nos.1 & 3. Mr.S.P. Kadam for Res.No.5. Mr.N.G. Deshpande for Res.No.2. ---- CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 6th July, 2009 P.C.: 1.The grievance of the Petitioner is that within a financial year meetings of Gram Sabha were not conducted four times as is required under the law. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that a complaint was made and inquiry was conducted by the Chief Executive Officer, who also came to the conclusion that the Gram Sabha had not been convened on four occasions within the financial year and in this view of the matter, the Chief Executive Officer 2 should have referred the matter to the Collector. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 submits that Respondent No.6 has no objection in sending the report of the Chief Executive Officer to the Collector. The Government Advocate submits that if the report of the Chief Executive Officer is received, the Collector would look into the matter and pass orders in accordance with law. However, it may be noted that the present Gram Panchayat came into office on 19th July 2008. The report is dated 21st March 2009 and as such, it is not even the report pertaining to one financial year. Such objections can also be taken before the Collector by the Gram Panchayat when the Collector hears the matter. 2. In view of the above, the Petition is disposed of. [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]