IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11169 of 2010 PARUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a police case instituted under sections 302/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner sprang up in the confession of a co-accused before the police and there is no direct evidence against him. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.09.2009. Moreover, other accused persons, namely, Kanhaiya Kumar, Rajendra Singh and Sanjeev Kumar have been granted bail by different benches of this Court. From the impugned order it appears that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is on bail in those cases and has been falsely implicated at the behest of the informant. In view of the fact that learned Addl. P.P. on going through the case diary has submitted that some material has come against the petitioner during the course of investigation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the - 2 - petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. Since the petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.09.2009, let the petitioner renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in jail custody. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J ) BTiwary/