SCA/6264/1993 1/2 JUDGMENT/home/rmr/sca512895o8. IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6264 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= KASHTABHANJAN HANUMANJI MANDIR & 4 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR SB VAKIL for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 5. MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 – 3. Ms. Falguni Patel, AGP for State. ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER Date : 11/01/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT Ms. Archana Acharya, advocate appearing for Shri SB Vakil, advocate for petitioners in this petition submits that Mr. Vakil has been instructed SCA/6264/1993 2/2 JUDGMENT/home/rmr/sca512895o8. by his clients, i.e., petitioners of SCA No. 6264/1993 to withdraw the petition. She places on record communication dated 7.1.2008 signed by Chief Executive Kothari, Sansthan, Vadtal instructing them to withdraw the petition. One Shri Babaji Devda,/home/rmr/sca512895o8. Revenue Manager of the establishment is present and he confirms the instruction given by the petitioners for withdrawing the petition. Mr. AJ Patel, advocate appearing for the respondents has seen the said communication and taken note of the request on behalf of the petitioners to withdraw the petition. The communication dated 7.1.2008 is taken on record. Mr. Patel, advocate submits that he has no objection if the request of the petitioner to withdraw the petition is granted. In view of the submission made by the learned advocates and no objection of the respondents, the subject petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. No order as to costs. [ K.M. Thaker, J. ] rmr.