IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 16738 of 2004 Between: Smt. M. Vani, W/o V. Sivachandrasekhar, N.F.C.P. Unit, Nuzivedu, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical & Family Welfare ( J2) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Medical & Health, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The District Medical & Health Officer, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. 4 The District Malaria Officer, Krishna District at Machilipatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to O.A.No. 1746 of 2003 dated 26-7-2004 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal and quash the same and consequently set aside the orders of the 3rd respondent in Rc.No. 4920/M2/92 dated 7-3-2003 as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) Seeking a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the relating to order dated 26.7.2004 in O.A. No. 1746 of 2003 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and to consequently set aside the orders issued by the third respondent in Rc. No.4920/M2/92 dated 7.3.2003 the petitioners filed this writ petition. The petitioners now file WPMP No. 9290 of 2008 in the above writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner along with other candidates, in terms of letter RC No.593/M2/03 dated 17.5.2006. When this writ petition is taken up for hearing, it is represented by both counsel that the issue involved in this writ petition had already been decided by this court in W.P.Nos.18420 of 2003 dated 2.11.2006 and W.P. No. 136 of 2003 dated 31.1.2008. Following the same, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 2.11.2006 made in W.P.Nos.18420 of 2003 and order dated 31.1.2008 made in W.P. No. 136 of 2003. No order as to cost. ____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI, J. ___________________ S.ASHOK KUMAR, J. April 15, 2008 MAS.