[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5965 OF 2007 Smt. Rashida Kamaluddin Sayyed .... Petitioner Vs. Shri Vijay Ramrao Katkar .... Respondent Ms Shilpa Hinge i/b Shri N.V. Vechalekar & Co. for the Petitioner. Shri V.S. Tadake for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. The present writ petition is filed against the order passed in R.C. Suit No.115 of 1996 whereby the Small Causes Court, Pune had held that the Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. The petitioner had challenged that order in Civil Revision Application No.12 of 2004 before the District Judge, Pune under Section 29(3) of the Bombay Rent Act. By the impugned order dated 2-4-2007 the revisional Court has rejected the petitioner’s revision application by holding that the suit is within the competence of the lower Court. Therefore, this writ petition. 2. Admittedly, the suit itself has been disposed of on 30-4-2008. The petitioner has preferred Civil Appeal No.496 of 2008. Same is pending before the District [2] Judge, Pune. In view of this, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, and as the suit itself is disposed of, I am inclined to keep this point open. The learned Appellate Judge to consider this facet along with the other grounds and pass order in accordance with law. The petition is, therefore, disposed of with liberty. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) sjs/D8wp5965.7 sjs/D8wp5965.7 sjs/D8wp5965.7