CRLR No. 75 of 2010 WITH Stay App. No. 360 / 10 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Mahesh Chandra Pant, Advocate present for the revisionist. Heard. This revision is directed against the order dated 19.03.2010, passed by Judge, Family Court, Nainital (Camp Haldwani), in Criminal Misc. Application No. 144 of 2005, whereby the revisionist has been directed to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month as maintenance to his wife Smt. Kiran Kunwar. Learned counsel for the revisionist pleaded that he is ready to keep his wife with him. It is further pleaded that he is unable to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month to his wife. The impugned order shows that the respondent had pleaded that she was ousted from her husband’s house after she was harassed for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. She has also pleaded that salary of the revisionist is Rs. 8,000/- per month. However, the revisionist in his written statement filed before the trial court admitted the marriage, but pleaded that his salary is only Rs. 3,500/- per month. He also denied the allegations of demand of dowry or harassment for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. The trial court after assessing the evidence on record directed the revisionist to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month as maintenance to his wife. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist and after going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any error of law committed by the trial court. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No. 360 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 20.04.2010 HN