IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.15540 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 24, 2011. Balbir Kaur .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner who is a retired Head Teacher from the Education Department, Government of Punjab, seeks a direction for the release of three advance increments earlier granted to her on possessing the higher qualifications of Gyani but later on withheld by the respondents at the time of her retirement. It is also apparent from the claim raised by the CWP No.15540 of 2011 [2] petitioner that she has not been paid the GPF amount of Rs.5,12,170/- which stands duly sanctioned, nor her claim for ACP on completion of 24/32 years of service has been finalized. The petitioner has raised her claim vide a representation dated 7.7.2011 (Annexure P-13) also but without any response thereto. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, however without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the above mentioned claim of the petitioner as contained in her representation dated 7.7.2011 and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE