IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.23 of 2010 RAMESH KUMAR Versus M/S KEJRIWAL FILMS & ORS. ----------- 08. 17.01.2011 Perused the office note dated 11.01.2011. The office has placed I.A. No.3554 of 2010, I.A. No.8477 of 2010 and I.A. No.80 of 2011. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that firstly, the Interlocutory Application No.80 of 2011 may be heard. Accordingly, the parties were heard on this Interlocutory Application being I.A. No.80 of 2011. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the appellant to the said Interlocutory Application No.80 of 2011. This Interlocutory Application No.80 of 2011 has been filed on behalf of the appellant. In the said application at paragraph 1, it is specifically mentioned that this Interlocutory Application is being filed for withdrawal of this First Appeal. However, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that because of typing mistake, in the prayer portion, prayer has been made for restraining the respondents. Therefore, the supplementary affidavit has been filed today in the Court itself and it is prayed that the prayer portion be deleted and in place of the said prayer portion, 2 it may be replaced that the appellants may be permitted to withdraw this First Appeal No.23 of 2010. The learned counsel for the respondents has got no objection. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Interlocutory Application No.80 of 2011 is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw this First Appeal. Accordingly, this First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)