IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.9121 of 1996 Between: P. Chandra Pal Babu S/O P.Babu Rao R/O Chirala, Prakasam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND The Convenor, ECET(FDH)-95, Regional Engineering College, Warangal, Warangal Dist. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to interview the petitioner and give admission to him in Computer Science and Engineering Branch forthwith by treating him as local candidate by declaring the action of the respondent in not interviewing the petitioner by treating him as local candidate to Sri Venkateswara University, Thirupati as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the instructions issued by the Respondent for ECET(FDH)-95. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.SUBBA REDDY (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (Not present) The Court made the following : ORDER: Questioning the action of the respondent in not interviewing and giving admission to him in Computer Science and Engineering Branch by treating him as non-local candidate, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. When the matter is taken up today, none appears for the petitioner as well as the respondent. By lapse of time the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 11.11.2004 Nsr To 1. The Convenor, ECET(FDH)-95, Regional Engineering College, Warangal, Warangal Dist. 2. Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court of AP., Hyderabad (OUT) 3. Two CD copies.