IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12505 of 2009 Between: Kommu. Laxminarayana, S/o. Pochaiah, Dharmpuri Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jagtial Division, Jagtial, Karimnagar District. 2 The Tahsildar, Dharmpuri Mandal, Dharmapuri, Karimnagar District. 3 The Deputy Tahsildar (CS), Jagtial, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: The dealership of the petitioner in respect of Fair Price Shop No.2104 of Dharmapuri Village, Karimnagar District was suspended by respondent No.1 vide his order, dated 29.07.2008 on the ground that the petitioner was found to have diverted 11.66 quintals of rice meant for Public Distribution System to black market. So far, enquiry has not been completed and final order has not been passed. In this writ petition, the petitioner placed reliance on a purported report, dated 29.12.2008 of respondent No.2 wherein he is alleged to have stated that his enquiries revealed that the allegations made against the petitioner are false and he has been running the fair price shop without violating the Control Order and the terms of the authorization. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the said report having been received by respondent No.1 about six months back, he has not completed the enquiry and restored the petitioner’s authorization. Admittedly, the enquiry is pending. Even if respondent No.2 has sent a report, it is for respondent No.1 to consider its contents and take a decision thereon. However, I do not find any justifiable reason for respondent No.1 in not completing the enquiry and passing a final order though nearly one year has elapsed from the initiation of the proceedings. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to complete the enquiry and pass a final order, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.16178 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 26th JUNE, 2009. kvni