IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU FRIDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2007 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1928 RPFC.No. 105 of 2007() ---------------------- MC.520/2006 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER/RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- MOONARAKANDATHIL MUHAMMED BASHEER, S/O. ALIKUTTY, PERUVAYAL AMSOM DESOM, PERUVAYAL P.O., PUVVATTUPARAMB, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER ------------------------ PULIKKAL SAFARUNEESSA, D/O. MOYINKUTTY, CHERUVAYOOR AMSOM DESOM, P.O.CHERUVAYOOR, ERANADU TALUK. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AMJAD ALI THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J --------------------------------------------- R.P.(FC)No.105 of 2007 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2007 ORDER Revision petitioner is the respondent in M.C.520/06. The revision petitioner challenges the order enhancing the rate of compensation from Rs.500/- to Rs.900/-. It is submitted that his contentions were not considered although he had filed a counter. 2. I find that the order impugned is not a considered one. In the circumstances, the same is set aside. The court below is directed to consider the matter after affording opportunities for both sides to adduce evidence and dispose of the matter on merits, expeditiously, at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The R.F.(FC) is disposed of as above. K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE csl K.R.UDAYABHANU, J Crl.R.P.No.929 of 1997 ORDER 26th February, 2007