COCP No. 1375 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No. 1375 of 2010 Date of decision:- 7.12.2010 Rashpal Singh. ....Petitioner Vs. Jasmeet Kaur, Director Public Instructions and another. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present:- Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Cheema, Sr. DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1 Mr. Rajiv N Raina, Advocate & Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate, for respondent No.2. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) ****** This Court on 12.02.2009 directed the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioner and the Managing Committee to decide the representation of the petitioner for payment of due salary. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1 to the effect that the appeal has since been decided on 15.09.2010. In respect of the representation, Mr. Raina states that amount of Rs.29,387/- was paid to the petitioner on account of balance salary i.e. Rs.15,387/- vide cheque dated COCP No. 1375 of 2010 2 13.10.2009 and Rs.14,000/- vide cheque dated 23.102009. The said payments have been accepted by the petitioner without any demur or protest. Therefore, the entire claim of the petitioner stands settled with the aforesaid payment and therefore, there was no necessity to pass any order on the representation submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner has not disclosed the fact that such payments were received by him in the instant contempt petition. Whether such payments are complete or not, is a question of fact. It shall be open to the petitioner to avail his remedy in respect of the balance payment, if any, in accordance with law. However, it cannot be said that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with. In view of the said fact, I do not find any further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Disposed of. (HEMANT GUPTA) 7.12.2010 JUDGE aj