IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.374 of 2007 Date of decision:26.02.2009 Bhagat Singh and another ...Petitioners versus Harinder Singh Bedi ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Ashok Paruthi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Goel, Advocate with Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for the respondent. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Revision against the order permitting the defendant the leave to defend. It is represented by the counsel for the revision petitioners that the evidence has already been given on the side of the landlord and the tenant had sought for several opportunities for giving his evidence. 2. It is seen that yet another tenant in the same premises has been granted similar relief and the case is being prosecuted before the Rent Controller. Under the circumstances, there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Rent Controller already granting relief to defend. 3. Having regard to the contentions raised by the landlord that the tenant is delaying with the proceedings, suffice it to Civil Revision No.374 of 2007 - 2 - direct that the Rent Controller concludes the evidence as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months from the receipt of this order. 4. The Civil Revision is, accordingly, disposed of in the above terms. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 26.02.2009 sanjeev