IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22093 of 2010 BIJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 396 and 412 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and during investigation his name sprang up on the statement of co-accused that co-accused sold some robbed articles to the petitioner. It is further submitted that investigation is still pending against the petitioner. Moreover, other persons have been granted regular bail in the matter. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. However, from perusal of the record, it appears that the petitioner’s name sprang up in the statement of co-accused during 2 investigation and the investigation is still pending against the petitioner. In that view of the matter, I think it is a good case for regular bail. If the petitioner surrenders, let the learned court below consider the regular bail application and if possible dispose off on the same day. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)