:1: bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.971 OF 2010 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.176 OF 2010 M/s.Stallion Enterprises ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.T.Majumdar with Mr.Bhaskar Bhagat i/b. Bhaskar & Co. for petitioner. Mr.P.S.Jately with Ms.S.I.Shah for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.R.K.Abhichandani, Senior Advocate with Mr.S.N.Kantawala & Rajesh Sharma i/b. Brijesh Pathak for applicants in Chamber Summons. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & S.J.KATHAWALLA,JJ. DATE :- 15TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused petition. 2. When the petition is called out for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner prayed for an adjournment. The adjournment prayed by the petitioner is opposed by the learned Counsel Mr.Jately for respondents. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the intervenor brought to our notice that the Domestic Industries have not been made party to the petition. :2: 4. Be that as it may, we went through the petition and the prayer clauses incorporated therein. It is not in dispute that the Custom Notification No. 52/2010-Customs dated 19th April, 2010 has already been issued based on the preliminary findings. In view of the fact that the said Notification is holding the field, it was obligatory on the part of the petitioner to challenge the said Notification. However, no challenge to the said Notification is to be found in the petition. Under these circumstances, the present petition is misconceived. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. 5. In view of dismissal of the Writ Petition, no orders are necessary in the Chamber Summons. Hence, the Chamber Summons is dismissed as infructuous. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)