IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13592 of 2011 Sujit Kumar son of Chandra Kumar Mishra, resident of village Khajuri P.O. Khajuri Simri, Police Station Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa …Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through Cabinet Secretary Govt. of India, New Delhi 2. Home Secretary, Govt. of India, New Delhi 3. Director General of Central Reserve Police Force,(C.R.P.F.)Govt. of India, New Delhi 4. Deputy Inspector General(Group Centre) Central Reserve Police Force,(C.R.P.F.) Sindri-Dhanbad (Jharkhand) 5. Deputy Inspector General CRPF, Gaya 6. Commandant cum P.O. Recruitment Board Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF)22, Battalion(CRPF) Hazaribagh, Jharkhand …Respondents For the petitioner :Mr. S. Azeem & :Mr. M. Ehtesham For the Union of India :Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Sr. Adv. ASG ----------- 02. 23.08.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Driver in the Central Reserve Police Force (for short ‘the CRPF’) pursuant to an advertisement. It is his case that he participated in the selection process and was declared successful, but he has been refused appointment on the ground that the driving licence produced by him was forged. Said order was passed by Respondent-Deputy Inspector General, CRPF as contained in Annexure-4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends with reference to the documents placed at Annexures-5 and 6 that, on query, the concerned District Transport Officer has already 2 issued necessary communication to the respondents whereby the driving licence issued to the petitioner was found genuine and true. He submits that in the setting of identical facts, one of the candidates, namely, Suman Kumar moved this Court in CWJC No. 368 of 2010 which was considered and disposed of by order dated 05.02.2010 (Annexure-7). A stand has been taken that the present application be also disposed of in the same terms. Learned Assistant Solicitor General, on going through the pleadings made in the writ petition, particularly Annexure-7, does not object to disposal of the present application in terms in which CWJC No. 368 of 2010 (Annexure-7) was disposed of. Having heard the counsel for the parties and on goring through relevant pleadings on record including Annexure-7, this Court disposes of the present application in terms in which CWJC No. 368 of 2010 was disposed of. Let the Deputy Inspector General (Group Centre) CRPF(Respondent-No.4) verify the genuineness of the driving licence of the petitioner bearing no. 41839/TV/MON/08 (Annexure-5) produced by the petitioner in support of his claim as also the certificate granted by the District Transport Officer, Mon, Nagaland (Annexure-6). In the event, it is found that those documents are genuine, then respondent no.4 shall take appropriate action to permit the petitioner to join the CRPF on the post of Driver by virtue of his selection for the said post. The entire process of consideration in the light of aforesaid 3 order shall be completed by the said respondent within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the said respondent. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )