IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49304 of 2008 SANJAY BANERJEE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.3.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel for the State. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner having admitted issuance of a cheque, which is said to have bounced, cannot get the privilege of bail, especially when the basic fact has not been controverted in the bail application. That being so, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Sanjay Banerjee is rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial of the petitioner so that the trial is concluded within a period of one year from today. In the event, the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner will have the liberty to move initially before the court below which would record reasons as to why the trial was not concluded within the aforesaid period, whereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. Narendra/ ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )