IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2009 / 25TH POUSHA 1930 CRP.No. 1057 of 2006(B) ------------------------------- OPELE.6/2005 of DISTRICT COURT, KASARAGOD REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT -------------------------------- KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS --------------------------- 1. SRI. K.K.NARAYANAN (DIED), SUPPL. K.K.KARTHIYAYANI, W/O. LATE K.K.NARAYANAN, AGED 53 YEARS, KIZHAKKE KUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEAR AYYAPPA BHAJANA MADAM, KUTHIRUMCHAL, P.O.THIMIRI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. MADHUSOODANAN K.K., AGED 34 YEARS, CARPENTER, S/O. LATE K.K.NARAYANAN, KIZHAKKE KUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEAR AYYAPPA BHAJANAMADAM, KUTHIRUMCHAL, P.O.THIMIRI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. MANJULA K.K., AGED 31 YEARS, D/O. LATE K.K.NARAYANAN, KIZHAKKE KUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEAR AYYAPPA BHAJANA MADAM, KUTHIRUMCHAL, P.O.THIMIRI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. MALLIKA K.K., AGED 31 YEARS, D/O. LATE K.K.NARAYANAN, KIZHAKKE KUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEAR AYYAPPA BHAJANA MADAM, KUTHIRUMCHAL, P.O.THIMIRI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 5. MANJUSHA K.K., AGED 24 YEARS, D/O. LATE K.K.NARAYANAN, KIZHAKKE KUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEAR AYYAPPA BHAJANA MADAM, KUTHIRUMCHAL, P.O.THIMIRI, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE FOR R1 TO R5 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. -------------------------------- Civil Revision Petition No.1057 of 2006 (B) ---------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of January, 2009 O R D E R The award in electricity O.P.No.6/2005 on the file of the District Judge, Kasargod is under challenge. The respondent Kerala State Electricity Board is the Revision Petitioner. The court below accepted the calculation statement filed by the Electricity Board and a final award was passed directing the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.8,174/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. Going by the discussions in the impugned order, I find that the re-fixation of compensation and grant of additional compensation of Rs.8,174/- is just and reasonable. Therefore, I find no reason to interfere with the award. The Civil Revision Petition has no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE skr