;i 'i. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATISGARHl W. P. N0. ^^'^OF 2002 ^ j^;.:' ^ PETmONER Durga Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Ganga Prasad Shanna, aged about 48 years, R/o 21/1372,Durga Niwas,Katora Talab, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .^%^"' ^ ^ ^ "1. Stafe of CUhattisgarh through Secretary, Water Resources ^^ Department, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Public Service Coimnission Chhattisgarh through its Secretaiy, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Pariyojana (Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Raipur (Chh^ttisgarh) ..-^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTtORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR QRDERS: '-•^;-' ste.'^P >¥^"^ '^'J' './\./ • 7) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION N0. 2737 OF 2002 Durga Prasad Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Harsh Wardhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Ms. Morisha Chhatri, Advocate for the PSC. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 28th day ofApril, 2010) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite repeated communications to the petitioner, he has not received any instruction, thus learned counsel pleads no instructions. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge