IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.R. No. 77 of 2010 Decided on: 30.07.2010 Sat Pal …Petitioner Versus Rajesh Madan …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequal to order dated 28.07.2010, undertaking in the shape of affidavit has been filed. The same is accepted. It is made clear that the petitioner shall now vacate the premises in question on 31.07.2012 and will abide by the other conditions, as mentioned in the affidavit/undertaking. It is also made clear that in case there is any breach/violation of the undertaking, furnished before this Court, it will amont to the contempt of court. 2. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 30, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?