HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6099 of 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT: The petitioner, who is the plaintiff filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking to assail the correctness and validity of the order dated 10.11.2010 made in I.A. No. 933 of 2010 in O.S. No. 3763 of 2009 on the file of the III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby the Court below rejected the application purported to have been filed under Order XVI Rule 7 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. seeking to summon the Postmaster for the purpose of proving the endorsement made on the cover. The Court below by taking into account the fact that the matter is at the stage of arguments and the petitioner filed the present application at a belated stage with a view to drag on the proceedings, has dismissed the said application. Hence, the present revision. Heard the learned counsel and perused the material on record. Admittedly, no purpose will be served by summoning the postmaster, especially when the cover bears an endorsement to the effect that the respondent was continuously absent for seven days. Hence, the Court below has rightly dismissed the said application. In the circumstances, I do not find any material illegality or irregularity in the order of the Court below warranting interference. The revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date: 11th February, 2011 pnb