1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.NO.999 of 2009 in F.A.ST.NO.2701 of 2009 Shri Zingru Rajaram Bhandare and anr. ..vs.. Shri Nitin Ajabrao Ingole and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.N.B.Bargat, Adv. for the appellants. Mr.Ananta Bandhre, Adv. for the respondents. C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 29th September, 2009. 1. This application has been filed for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal. 2. The appellants had filed a civil suit. The said civil suit came to be decree on 28/5/2008. Thereafter, the decree was drawn. They had applied for certified copy on 12/6/2008 which was received on 9/7/2008. It is the contention of the applicants that they were not aware that the suit was dismissed and when they came to know about the dismissal, 2 they were shocked. It is also alleged that they did not have sufficient funds to file an appeal and therefore they could not prefer an appeal within time. 3. The application has been opposed by the respondents. They deny the contention in the application and according to them, no sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay. 4. After having heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the respondents, I find that it is clearly mentioned in the application that the appellants, in fact, were not aware of the decision and due to the old age they could not contact their lawyer immediately and could not make arrangement for money for filing an appeal. I think these are the sufficient causes which are shown by the appellants. In the circumstances, the delay stands condoned. The appeal be registered. JUDGE. chute