1 20appw.264-11-wp.2807-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.264 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2807 OF 2010 Michael Anthony Soosai. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and 2 others. ..Respondents. .......... Mr.S.K. Raj, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.S.V. Gajre, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Hitesh Vyas, Advocate for Orig.Respondent No.11 . Mr.T.J. Pandian, Advocate for Orig.Respondent Nos.5 to 10. .......... CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR AND P. D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 16th AUGUST, 2011. P.C. 1. Considering the reasons stated in the orders of this Court dated 7.1.2011, 17.1.2011 and lastly dated 24.1.2011, the question of showing any indulgence to the applicant does not arise. This application is in the nature of review, that too the petitioner has not chosen to submit to the jurisdiction of the Court – which was the expectation in the aforesaid orders. Counsel for the applicant concedes that the applicant had filed application for anticipatory bail which has also been rejected. 2. In this view of the matter, we do not think it appropriate to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant. Application is dismissed. PPD 2 20appw.264-11-wp.2807-10 We do not intend to go into the objection raised by the Counsel for the original respondents that in the present application the said respondents have not been made party. For the reasons already recorded, application is dismissed. (P. D. KODE, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)