CP /=y'fysi3.: HKtK¥l ^^/CT^- S.q (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH ATBILASPUR (CHHATHSGARH) WRTT PETmON N0. i-W{.f, /2006. PETITIONER: .^ ^~ \n^x<^ ..••• v>;'' ^... ^^{^.^ .^'' ^*'' ^' ....•• Respoadents ^ Keshar Singh Dudt, (wrongty written as Keshar Singh Thakur), S/o Bhsgwat Singh Dbdt, Asst. Teacher, aged about 47 years, Govt. Middle_School, Sahaspur (Devkar), Block Development Saja, Bemetara, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipiir, Chhattisgarh. /^2. Director of School Educadon Office, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. /3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, Through Block Development Mucation Officer, Saja, Dui^, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COSSTtTUTION OF INDIA HISH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s) No. 4996 of 2006 Petitioner Keshar Singh Dixit Versus Respondents S'tate of Chhaftisgarh & others Sir^Se Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri O.P. Sohu, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for -rtie respondents/State. OR&ER )th (12n September, 2006) 1. Learned ccunsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qualifications on his own expenses and acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on 2.9.1995 from Barikatul!ah University, Bhopa!. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municlpal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (H) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, burg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion tiiat 1+ie teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own sxpenses, are covered by L. 1+>e circutcr dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/l) issued by the State ^overnment of Madhya Pradesh Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of iaw involved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwcmt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, &urg and another (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fajrfy concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counse! appearing for the petitioner. Accordingty, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the coee of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whefher the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Exafflination Certificate on his own expenses or not. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge