W.P. No.16672/2006(s) 15.12.2011 Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S. K. Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Petitioner claims grant of renewal of his license to run his Saw Mill. It is seen from the record that under similar circumstances on 7.4.2005 W.P. No.28868/2003 was disposed of and following directions were issued :- "Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am inclined to direct that if the petitioner files an application for renewal of the license within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order passed today by annexing all the necessary documents and comply with the formalities before the competent authority, the same shall be dealt with accordingly and if there is no impediment his license be renewed by imposing such terms and conditions which would be regulatory in nature. By virtue of this direction the orders by which there has been declination to grant license stand wiped off. The authority is at liberty to impose such conditions while dealing with the application for renewal. Needless to emphasize the present direction has been issued as herein has been technical violation by the petitioner and not the violation which is substantial in nature. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in above terms. There shall be no order as to costs." Keeping in view the order passed under similar circumstances in W.P. No.28868/2003, it is directed that in case petitioner also files an application for renewal in accordance to the directions issued as indicated herein above, respondents shall consider and decide the claim of the petitioner keeping in view the directives and observations as indicated herein above and decide the claim of petitioner by speaking order within a period of two months. With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of. c.c. as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) J U D G E mrs. mishra