IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5213 of 2008 Between: Sunkara Shivaramakrsihna Prasad S/o. Late Venkateshwararao R/o. Manasa Apartment Flat No.G-4, Srinagar, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Police, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 4 The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam. 5 The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Visakhapatnam. 6 The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District. 7 The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.P.V.L.BHANU PRAKASH for DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantial relief: ‘It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in framing fresh charges subsequent to registering of complaints with regard to same allegations made in c.C.No.246 of 2004 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Section 218 of Cr.P.C., and consequently, direct the respondents herein to figure complainants who lodged complaints in various police stations with regard to the same allegations made in C.C.No.246 of 2004 as witnesses to C.C.No.246 of 2004 on the file of III Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, if they so feel relevant instead of filing different charge sheets.’ Sri P.V.L.Bhanu Prakash, learned Counsel representing Dr.P.B.Vijaya Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.6755 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ____________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 17-03-2008 LUR