1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.PETITION NO.1903/2010 Hardas Vs. State & Anr. Date of order : 2/11/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.K. Mathur for the petitioner. Shri Peeyush Kumar, P.P. for the State. ****** This petition u/s.482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashment of the FIR No.342/10 lodged against petitioner by the plaintiff for offence u/s.420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC in Police Station Tijara, Alwar on 10.8.2010. Shri R.K. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that there can no no question of forgery and the allegation of the complainant for offence u/s.467, 468 and 471 of IPC is totally unfounded even from the bare reading of First Information Report because he himself is seeking to base his allegation on the basis of agreement to sale dated 17.6.2009. It is alleged that petitioner agreed to sale his agricultural land for sale consideration of Rs.2,00,000/- and received a sum of Rs.1,36,000/- as advance. If that be so, the allegation of forgery does not stand. It is denied that petitioner made concealment or suppressed the facts of earlier transaction of sale. The earlier transaction of sale were also disputed by the petitioner for which 2 separate litigation is pending between the petitioner and the earlier buyer. Shri Peeyush Kumar, learned PP submitted that the police in the initial investigation has not found any substance that the allegation of offence u/s.467, 468 and 471 of IPC has been made by the complainant. However, after the investigation so far made, it has come to tentative conclusion that case is made out for offence u/s.420 and 406 of IPC. If petitioner wants to produce any material before the Investigating Officer to prove his bona fide, the same would be considered while coming at the final conclusion. In view of the fact that the allegation in the FIR raises a matter worth investigation and the investigation by the police is under way, this Court does not consider appropriate to interfere in the matter. However, the petitioner would be free to submit any material which he wants to produce before the Investigating Officer, which shall be considered by him in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of with that observation. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS