IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 863 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : May 20, 2009 Ashok Kumar Petitioner Versus Chiman Devi and others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Khungar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.K. Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Prashant Vashisth for respondents No. 1 to 3, 5 and 6 A.N. JINDAL, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff/appellant/petitioner(hereinafter referred as 'the petitioner') was dismissed. During the pendency of the appeal, petitioner has moved an application for leading additional evidence which has been declined by the appellate Courts. Heard. The records transpire that documents sought to be proved by way of additional evidence at the appellate stage do not in any way help the case of the petitioner. The fact is that Karan Anand allegedly was minor at the time of agreement and the application for seeking permission to sell the property was dismissed for want of non-prosecution and still Des Raj, predecessor-in-interest of the respondents could not execute the agreement qua Chiman Devi, Pramod Kumar and Anand. The documents viz. petition dated 3.11.95 under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act and order dated 31.5.97 passed C.R. No. 863 of 2009 (O&M) -2- thereon are not necessary and material for just decision of the appeal. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 20.05.2009 JUDGE reena