WP(C) 4363/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. Soren, lear ned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos 1 and 6. Also hea rd Mr. D.Das, learned Standing counsel, BTC appearing for the remaining responde nts. The petitioner’s grievance, as expressed in the writ petition, was that unlike s ome other Territorial Council Level Co-ordination Committees, as far as the peti tioner was concerned, he had not been nominated as Chairman of the Territorial C ouncil Level Co-ordination Committees (in short, TCLCC), and since he is the loc al member of the Council of Legislative Assembly (BTC), he ought to have been no minated as a member of the TCLCC. In fact, the relevant guidelines, issued in th is regard make it clear that the Chairman of the TCLCC , has to be nominated by Governing Body of the district and if a local BTC member is not nominated as Cha irman, he would be nominated as a member. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner has already been nomin ated as a member of the concerned TCLCC. Situated thus, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication, particul arly, when the grievances of the petitioner, in the writ petition, had been that if not as Chairman, he ought to have been nominated as at least, a member of th e said Body. In the circumstances as indicated above Mr. Mondal, learned counsel for the peti tioner, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Court , in future, if so advised. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court, in future, if so advised, for appropriate reliefs.