IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. CWP. No. 872 of 2009 Date of Decision: 18.2.2010. Sarita Devi --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents 2. CWP. No. 1084 of 2009 Anju Malik --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents 3. CWP. No. 1433 of 2009 Jitender Kumar and others --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Anurag Goel, Advocate. Mr. S.K. Redhu, Advocate. Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Renu, Advocate. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Mr. Kundu submits that pursuant to the interim directions passed by this Court vide order dated 20.1.2009, the petitioners in these petitions were interviewed and considered for selection. Petitioner Sarita Devi in CWP No. 872 of 2009 was in the general category. Similarly, petitioner Anju Malik was also in general category. The cut off marks for general category candidates are 52.74, whereas both these petitioners have secured 42.26 and 39.47 marks respectively, much below the cut off points. CWP. No. 872 of 2009 -2- Similarly, the three writ petitioners in CWP No. 1433 of 2009 namely Jitender Kumar, Mrs. Sneh Khola and Nita Yadav have secured 39.50, 37.36 and 37.14 marks respectively in B.C.B category as against the cut off points of 50.80. All these petitioners have secured marks much below the last selectee and could not be selected. A copy of the result sheet has been placed on record. In view of the above circumstances, nothing survives in these writ petitions, which are accordingly dismissed. A copy of this order be placed on each connected file. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 18.2.2010. lucky