THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.25827 OF 2009 Dated 1st December, 2009 Between : B.Srinivasulu …. Petitioner And Commissioner of Labour and three others …. Respondents The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner is the Union of employees working in the third respondent Center. Its grievance is that the working conditions of its members are being altered by the third respondent contrary to the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short “the Act”) and other relevant enactments. A representation is said to have been made on 16.11.2009 to respondents 1 and 2 and it is complained that no action has been taken thereon. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2. The Act provides for various mechanisms of resolution of industrial disputes such as conciliation, arbitration and adjudication. The petitioner does not complain of any acts of termination or retrenchment. Though it is represented that the service conditions of some of its employees are being altered, to their detriment, the representation dated 16.11.2009 does not reflect the same. The petitioner can certainly make proper application to respondents 1 and 2 to initiate conciliation about its grievances, in case they are referable to the provisions of the Act. Even now such a representation can be made and respondents 1 and 2 can be required to take necessary steps in accordance with law. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to make proper representation to respondents 1 and 2 pointing out its grievances. In case respondents 1 and 2 find that any action can be taken thereon, with reference to the provisions of the Act and Rules made thereunder, steps shall be initiated within two (2) weeks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated 1st December, 2009 vrn