IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 12645 of 2008. Decided on: 01.08.2011. _______________________________________________ Tara Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Bimal Gupta, learned counsel representing respondent No.5 has placed on record the copy of salary statement of the petitioner. It is evident from this statement that the petitioner has already joined as Trained Graduate 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Teacher (Arts). In view of this, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 01, 2011. (sck).