IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.14573 of 2010 1. BRIJESH KUMAR MAHTO @ BRIJESH MAHTO 2. Lal Babu Pd. Mahto @ Lal Babu Mahto 3. Chhathu Mahto 4. Binod Mahto @ Binod Kr. Mahto Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ram Kishun Pd., learned counsel for the informant. Parties are descendant from common ancestor and land dispute is there. Only petitioner no.2 is alleged for causing assault by means of bhala on head but finding the same simple suggesting a case for bailable offence. All the petitioners were allowed bail by the Police. Really, allegations are not appearing justified for offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. So, there is no need of passing any fresh order for bail rather petitioners are allowed to remain on Bail so granted to them in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 344 of 2008, Tr. No. 1804 of 2010. Accordingly, with the above observations the application is disposed of. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)