THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRL.R.C.M.P.Nos. 824 of 2013 AND 823 of 2013 AND CRL.R.C.No. 535 of 2013 ORDER: Office raised an objection for the revision filed by the petitioner herein. The facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner was convicted by the appellate Court. The petitioner preferred a petition to suspend the sentence. The appellate Court returned the same with the following order: “How this petition is maintainable in the absence of the petitioner- Appellant” It is the duty of the counsel or the petitioner to inform how the petition is maintainable before the Court which returned the same and there is no scope for revision against the refusing order, because it cannot be called as an order in the eye of law. In the result, the dispense with petition i.e. CRL.R.C.M.P.(SR) No. 28343 of 2011 is ordered and the Crl.R.C.M.P.(SR) No. 28318 of 2011 and Revision are dismissed. The Registry is directed to return the originals to the petitioner. _________________ RAJA ELANGO,J Date:29.08.2011. CHV