..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2007 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2007 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.18 OF 2007 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2007 Shri Anil Vipinchandra Desai. ..Applicant. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, & 2. Cine Costume & Makeup Artists’ Association, through Mr.Henry John Martis. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Imtiyaz Patel, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr.G.B.Naik, Adv. for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant, the learned Advocate for respondent No.2 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant came to be convicted in four cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The Appeal preferred by the applicant came to ..(2).. be dismissed. Hence, the present Revisions. 3. During pendency of the Revisions, the parties have amicably settled the matter and they have arrived at consent terms. The said content terms are tendered in the Court. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of the consent terms, all the matters are compounded and the applicant is acquitted therein. Respondent No.2-orig.complainant is granted permission to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,90,000/- which has been deposited by the applicant before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Dadar, Mumbai. 4. Criminal Revision Applications are disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)