v6”«/’ smgh Ram‘h w“ (é ~ , IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No. gq‘g 12005 PETITIONE QWpPal‘aO, Agcd about 51 years, S/o Gauraan’g, R/o E.W.S.1891, Adarsh Nagar, Housmg Board, Bh11a1, a Distt. Durg (C.G.) . ““6. ( ESPONDENTS 1. Municipal Corporaticn through its Commissioner, Bhilai, Distt. Durg /'2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bhilai «1 Distt. Durg. ‘S‘” '/ ‘ /3 The State of Chhattisgarh y Ev?” Through Its Secretary,” \9 4». Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S. Bha an, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ow w w R ’( K K 1 \’>rWM HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 845 of 2005 PETITIONER : Apparao. VERSUS Municipal Corporation & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF TI-E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Han’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondents 1 and 2. Sim, Smita Ghai, Panei Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 3. RESPONDENTS ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 16 day of September, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by order dated 15m December, 2000 (Annexure P/l) the petitioner was granted regular appointment and posted for a period of two years on probation, wherein specific pay-scale was mentioned. Thereaiter, an order was passed on 20m December. 2000 (Annexure P /2) whereby the pay scaie as mentioned in the order dated 15m December, 2000 (Annexure P/l) was not granted to the petitioner, but was kept under determination. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the process of determination of grant of regular pay scale is under consideration. 3. Be that as it may, ifthe respondents l and 2 have varied salary or pay scale ader gant of pay scale vide order dated 15m December, 2000 (Annexure P/ 1), that cannot be done without affording an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner. However, at this stage, the Court will not interfere with the decision of the employer. The respondents l and 2 are directed to take immediate decision having regard to the order dated 15m December, 2000 and 20m December, 2000 (Anneme 13/3) and determine the proper pay scale ofthe petitioner and make payment thereof at the earliest. 4. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of / / / (I saesh K. sal— Agnihw" _ Judge Amit ow ‘K