IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH (14TH) DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.2092 of 2009 Between: Sanjay Kumar Bhati & others … Petitioners And: The Authorized Officer, Land Reforms Tribunal R R District at Hyderabad & others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.2092 of 2009 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 17.03.2009 in IA No.1686 of 2008 in LRA SR No.4388 of 2008 on the file of the LRAT cum II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy district, wherein the said application filed by the petitioners herein under Rule 16(7) of the Land Reforms Act for grant of permission to file third party appeal against the impugned orders passed by the first respondent in CC No.CH/2531 of 1975 dated 28.02.1983, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the first respondent-State. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that aggrieved by the same orders, which are impugned in the appeal sought to be filed by the petitioners, some of the land-holders filed batch of writ petitions in respect of various extents of the subject land and this Court by order dated 30.12.2009 allowed WP No.11232 of 2000 and batch, setting aside the same impugned orders and making it clear that the said order will not come in the way of the respondents-authorities to examine all the aspects and pass a comprehensive order under the Act, after putting all the parties concerned on notice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that some of the affected parties approached the High Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, while the petitioners herein have chosen to file appeal with the leave of the Court and that though the forum chosen is different, the grounds raised are the same while assailing the same impugned orders. 5. Under those circumstances, in view of the orders dated 30.12.2009 allowing the batch of writ petitions, it is considered just and proper to grant leave to the petitioners herein to file appeal. 6. In the circumstances, the impugned order, dismissing the application for grant of leave is set aside and consequently, IA No.1686 of 2008 stands allowed and the petitioners are granted leave to file the appeal. 7. In the result, the civil revision petition is allowed accordingly. No order as to costs. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 14.12.2011 bss