wml$ .................................... mzoo W 311%21 W (WE) V WW§%€IW- mmmsnésr aiwmsi Sinale Bench: Herbie Mr. Jusfice Dhirendra Mishra! W.P is! No.6098/2008 @efifion U/A 226 of Consfi‘rufion of India) Mr. DRJPaTei, Advoca‘re for The peTi‘rioner'. Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for The State. 04. 1 1 ‘ 2008 Heard. Grievance of fhe pe‘rii oner is ‘rhai' he was appoin'red as Upper Division Teacher 'vide order of Annexure P-l da‘red 14.10.1986. His seniori‘ry in fhe gradafion list 3f Annexure P—2 is aT 5r. No.1748 wherein ‘his da're of joining is men‘rion d as 14.10.1986. Upper Division Teachers were given gromofion as pe recommendafions of The Depar‘rmenfai Promo‘rion Commi'i'fee vide o der dafed 13Th/14 December, 1999 of PETITIONER PadJm La! Pcrrel, 5/0 Sri Ganpm' La! Pm'el, - - aged abou'i' 42 years, Lecfurer- (Ma‘i'hs) Gov‘ammen‘l’ Higher Secondary School, Devgaon, Block Bammkela, Dis'f‘r. Raigarh (C.6.) Vs RE5PQNDENT$ A 1. Sm‘fe of Chha‘r‘risgar‘h, Through :iecremr‘y, School Educa'rion Depar‘rmen‘r, D.K.5. Bhowan, Raipur (6.6.) 2. Eirecfor/Commissioner‘, Lok Shikshan 5anchanaluya, Chhaf‘risgarh, Raipur'. 3. E isfr-ic? Edaca‘rion Officer, Ra§garh (CGJ Present WWW x WWWW 111200 anéeT m (W) mmW anésl mm§wm aimméet - fl/.V.. Annexure P-4 and in fhe said c fhe persons of genera! cai 31.12.1986, have been promo? vide order du'red 23.11.2005 a fiiéd represen‘mfion vide’ w.e.f.17.8.1998 as his juniors irder iT Was caTegorically menTioned ThaT all egory,’ whose senioriTy commenced from ed. However,_ The peTiTioner was promoTed f Annexure P—5. The peTiTioner has already AnneXure P¥6 for granT of s'enioriTy were promoTed on ThaT daTe, however, The, same has nof been decided Till ddfe.- ‘ ‘ Mr. Bhadurii learned counsel appearing for‘fhe STa‘re submi'r's ThaT in case The pe'l'i‘rioner files f‘esh represen‘l'a‘iion before The responden‘r No.2 raising all his grievances. raised in This pe'l'ifioni ihe same shall be considered, and decided wii'hin a period of six weeks from The daTe of fhe receip‘l‘ of The represenTaTion. In view of The above su missions of learned coLlnsel for'The parTiesi The insTanT peTiTion is dispose of wiTh liberTy To The peTiTioner To make a fresh IrepresenTaTion along iTh cerTified copy of This order before respondenT No.2 raising all T e grievances; raised in This peTiTion and on V such represenTaTion being m de, respondenT No.2 is'direcTed To decide The said represenTaTion in‘ac rdance wiTh law, on iTs own meriT, wiThin period of six weeks from The aTe of receipT of The represenTaTion.l i, ‘ 1 dj J 3—hiréndra S- Mishra V , ~ Judge ll K a