1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 13576 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 7834 0F 2009 *** Roopchand S/o Chandmal Parakh (Jain) Versus The State of Maharashtra and another *** 1. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties, including learned A.G.P. Mr. Gangapurwala, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, admits that after remand of the matter, by the learned Additional Commissioner, the authority competent / Tahsildar has passed an order in favour of the Respondent No.2 (person claiming to be an ex-serviceman and belonging to scheduled caste). Mr. Ladda, learned counsel for the application seeks withdrawal of the civil application with liberty to challenge the said order passed by the Tahsildar on 15th December, 2009, during the pendency of the writ petition, by filing appropriate proceeding. After hearing counsel for the Respondent, in my view, such liberty can be granted. 2. Civil application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the Applicant to file appropriate proce3eding challenging the order passed by the learned 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Tahsildar dated 15th December, 2009. 3. Counsel for the petitioner/ applicant seeks suspension of the order passed in Writ Petition No.7834 of 2009 and seeks status-quo for two weeks from today. Mr. Gangapurwala fairly concedes that status-quo was granted by this Court on 6th January, 2010 in this civil application. In this view of the matter, status-quo granted on 6th January, 2010 shall stand extended till 18th March, 2010. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:02/03/2010. ans/13576