IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7847 of 2010 -------------------------------------- [CRIME NO.698/2010 OF VADAKKEKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT] ................. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 3: -------------------------------------------- 1. JINEESH @ JINNAPPI, AGED 32, S/O.RAJAN, ARAKKATHAZAM VAYALU PADAM HOUSE, THATHAPILLY, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. 2. RAJU, AGED 32, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, THODU HOUSE, BLANGAD POONTHIRUTHY DESOM, KADAPPURAM VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. TEKCHAND. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V.RAMKUMAR, J. ----------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.7847 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 09th day of December, 2010 ORDER The petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 & 3 in Crime No.698 of 2010 of Vadakkekad Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 399 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 28/10/2010. The petitioners were arrested on 28/10/2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the second accused is involved in eight other cases including a murder case and the third accused is involved in six other crimes including two murder cases and that they were found in a Tavera Car within the limits of Vadakkekad Police Station armed with deadly weapons like daggers, iron rods, etc. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offence, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are Bail Appln.No.7847/2010 : 2 : released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj