IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 7359/2008 Decided on:9.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Parshotam Ram. …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioners : Nemo. For the Respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner was promoted on ad hoc basis to the post of Chief Inspector in the pay scale of Rs. 5800-9200. This order was not given effect to on the ground that the disciplinary proceedings were pending against him. Thereafter, case of the petitioner was considered by a duly constituted Departmental Promotion Committee for the post of Chief Inspector, which met on 24.10.2000. Petitioner was found unfit. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 2. Since the petitioner’s suitability has been adjudged by a Departmental Promotion Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. 3. Consequently, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 9.12.2010 *awasthi*