1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4318 OF 2010 NAVIN RAMESHCHANDRA KATRELA Age : 36 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O H. NO. 3/13/93 RAJABAZAR AURANGABAD, PO & DIST AURANGABAD ..PETITIONER ERSUS 1. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THROUGH THE SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES, ENERGY AND LABOUR DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI-400 032) 2. TALATHI OF GANDHELI VILLAGE C/O GANDHELI TALATHI OFFFICE, MAULINAGAR, BEED BYE PASS, TQ. & DIST. AURANGABAD 3. TAHSILDAR, GANDHELI OFFICE AT TAHSIL OFFICE, COLLECTOR OFFICE COMPOUND, LABOUR COLONY, TQ. & DISTRICT AURANGABAD ..RESPONDENTS Mrs Vasundhara Rao, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 6th May, 2010 2 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER GANGAPURWALA , J ] Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties the petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission. 2. For the nature of grievance made in this petition, following the principles stated in unreported decision of the Division bench of this Court in the case of Gopinath Gaunaji Zhauk and others. vs. State of Maharashtra and others in Writ Petition No.3581 of 2009 and connected cases decided on 14.8.2009, we direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to enter sale transaction of the petitioner's land bearing Gat No.285 situated in Gandheli village in Taluka and District Aurangabad, in the Register of Mutation and issue 7/12 extract. 3. Needless to observe that such entry will have to abide by the proposed acquisition action resorted by the concerned authorities. 3 4. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute in above terms with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE amj/wp4318.10