1 52 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 2284/2006 [SMT. SUNITA VS. STATE & ORS.] Dated : 25.02.2008 HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr.R.S.Choudhary for the petitioner. Mr.B.L.Tiwari Dy.G.A. for the respondent. Mr.D.L.Mothra for the respondent. ***** Learned counsel for the petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the selection of respondent No.9 on the post of Anganwari Worker. It is submitted that the said selection was made in violation of Circular dated 15.09.2003 inasmuch as the petitioner was better qualified than the respondent No.9. Learned counsel for respondent No.9 submits that due to her financial condition, selection was made and pursuant to the selections, no appointments have been made till date. Hence other than recommendation of Gram Sabha no consequential benefit has been given to the respondent No.9. The counsel appearing for the State submits that looking to the controversy raised herein, the matter may be sent back for fresh consideration by Gram Sabha of all the candidates who made the application earlier and whose case was otherwise considered. The consideration would be made strictly as per the circular issued by the Government. 2 In view of the submission made by the counsel for the parties, since no appointments have been made pursuant to the recommendation of the Gram Sabha even after expiry of almost two years and that too when no interim order was passed by the Court restraining such appointments. Now considering the submission of the learned counsel for the State it would be appropriate to direct the Gram Sabha to reconsider the candidature of the candidates whose candidature has earlier been considered with update record as on the date of consideration regarding eligibility and other material facts concerned to each candidate for which the candidates may be at liberty to file fresh necessary documents. The consideration would then be made by the Gram Sabha strictly as per the Circular issued by the Government and thereupon if recommendations are made and it is thought appropriate by the respondents then necessary order of appointments may issued. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions. (MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI), J. mamta