IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2003. APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2003. APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2003. The State of Maharashtra. ... Appellant. Versus. Shivaji Kaluram Tilekar & others. ... Respondents. Shri Y.M.Nakhwa, A.P.P. for the Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 12th October, 2006. : 12th October, 2006. : 12th October, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P. for the Appellant on the question of grant of leave. The learned trial Judge has recorded a finding that the complainant could not lead evidence to show that the alleged sample bottles were washed, cleaned and dried and the same were empty. A finding is recorded that there is a breach of provisions of Rule 14 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 1955 and section 11(1)(b) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. There is also a finding that admittedly requirement of Rule 7(3) of the said Rules of 1955 is not complied with. 2. I find that no reason to grant leave to prefer Appeal against acquittal. No ground is made out for grant of leave. Appeal is dismissed. Judge. Judge. Judge.