IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29824 of 2009 MD.GUFRAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR --------- 4. 17.11.2009. This application has been listed today under the heading ‘to be mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner. In this case bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order passed on 15.10.2009. The name of the petitioner is Md. Gufran as is manifest from the vakalatnama filed with the bail application but due to typographical mistake occurring in the bail application itself, the name of the petitioner is not clearly worded. It is on the basis of the unclear name of the petitioner occurring in the bail application that in the order sheet dated 15.10.2009, the name of the petitioner was printed as Md. Gurran in place of Md. Gufran both in the Cause title as well as in the concluding paragraph. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is permitted to correct the name of the petitioner in the bail application in course of the day so that the petitioner’s name be learly read as Md. Gufran. Let the name of the petitioner as occurring in the order no.3 dated 15.10.2009 and 2 pronounced as such be corrected and be modified so as to read as Md. Gufran in place of Md. Gurran both in the Cause Title and in the concluding paragraph of the order. The order no.3 dated 15.10.2009 stands corrected and modified and pronounced to that extent. The learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to deposit the cost for communication of this order by Fax. He is permitted to do so. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)