THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.9832 of 2009 Dated 18th August, 2011 Between: Syed Shamsheuddin …Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adilabad District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Nazeer Khan Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 3: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent Nos.4 & 5: AGP for R & B Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri M.V.Kiwi & Co., The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ or order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5 in not taking the action in respect of re-survey of structure No.NRG-36 of Neradigonda village and Mandal effected by widening of National Highway No.7 of the petitioner before dismantling the said structure is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300(A) of Constitution of India and also violative of the National Highway Authority of India Act, 1988 and also against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to make the re-survey of said structure before dismantle the structure for which the National Highway No.7.” At the hearing, it is agreed among all the learned counsel for the parties that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment, dated 28.05.2011, in W.P.No.9831 of 2009. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said order with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 06.05.2009, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.12768 of 2009 and W.V.M.P.No.2676 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th August, 2011 Note: Issue CC in one week. (b/o) VGB