1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6857 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Ankush Nivrutii Tambe ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ---- ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6858 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Smt. Anjali Deepak Raje ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6863 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s 2 Smt. Mrudula Ramaan Khole ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ---- ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6864 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Ramdas Mahadeo Kadam ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ---- ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6865 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Suresh Ramchandra Kelkar ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. 3 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6868 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Arun Laxman Gaikwad ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6869 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Prabhakar P. Karanjikar ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6870 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. 4 V/s Shri Eknath P. Kadam ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6871 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Suresh G. Kodte ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6872 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ......Petitioners. V/s Shri Pradip Dattatray Joshi. ....Respondent. ---- Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, Assistant Government Pleader, for Petitioners. Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the Respondent. 5 CORAM: H.S. BEDI, C.J., & V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2006 P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing before the Tribunal did not dispute that this matter was identical to matters which had been decided by the Aurangabad and Nagpur Benches. The learned Counsel for the respondents also informs us that in some of the present matters the Petitioners have already acted upon the direction of the Tribunal dated 12/4/2006. We observe from the grounds in the Petition that there is no averment whatsoever that the concession made by the Government Pleader was either wrong or should not have been made. In this view of the matter, the Petitions are dismissed. 6 CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.