IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 2222 of 2008. Decided on: 23 rd November, 2010. Hukam Chand Sharma and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No ________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, learned counsel for the petitioners, during the course of hearing, has confined the relief only for the grant of annual increments after taking into consideration the period of tenure appointment followed by regularization. This issue is no more res integra in view of the judgment rendered by this Court in Paras Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No. 7712 of 2008, decided on 19.5.2009. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for the release of annual increments after counting the period of tenure appointment followed by regularization, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 23, 2010. (bhupender)