1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.534 OF 2009 Mukta d/o Nanasaheb Dhole ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr D.R.Markad, Advocate for petitioner Mr K.B.Choudhari, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr A.D.Deshmukh, Advocate holding for Mr D.N.Bankar Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr A.B.Kadethankar, Advocate for respondents 3 and 4 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 13th April 2011 PER COURT The learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition in view of the fact that the dispute with respect to payment of salary has been settled. He, however, points out that since the petitioner's service have been terminated, the petitioner does not press prayer (B) and he will approach the Tribunal for appropriate remedy. Allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (vvr/534.09wp)