1 V {/15 { WA $3ngie Bench" \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR HQ w.P. s No. 7 5705 2010 PETITIONFR: Kamlesh Kumar Goswami Aged about 51 years S/o Shri Ummedgiri Goswami, R/O Ward No. 11, Shankar Para, Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon (CG) I VERSUS * RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe Development Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Commissioner/ Director Tribal Welfare Department Government of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya, D.I<.S. Bhawan Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Collector District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 4. Assistant Commissioner Department of Tribal Development » Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) /Z PETITION UNDER ‘ ARTICLES 226/ OF THE CONSTITUTIONLOF . INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- H IGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 7603 OF 2010 Kamlesh Kumar Goswami Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihatri, J.) Present :- Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey; Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 25‘“ day of January, 201 1) 1. Challenge in this petitions is to the show cause notice dated 29.11.2010 (Annexure P-1), which was issued to the petitioner after having taken decision on 28.1 1 .2005 to cancel promotion of l the petitioner to the post of Upper Division Teacher. \ 2. Since, the identical issue to that of present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in Rajesh Kumar Shukla v’. State cf Chhattisgarh & Others’ and other connected writ petitions, no separate order is necessary in this petition and the petition is allowed interms of Rajesh Kumar Shukla (supra). ll /. ll ll sw— l §Satish K. Agnihotri-s i ‘ Judge ashok / om4i (I 4' WP(S) No.7658/2010 (Decided on 25.1 .201 1) &