1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6358 OF 2009 Sunita Mohan Ghogare .. Petitioner. Vs. Devidas Babanrao Kadam & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Sandeep Pathak for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Patil A.G.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 29TH JULY, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition challenges the orders passed by the authorities below confirming the no confidence motion passed against the petitioner - Sarpanch unanimously on 20.3.2009. Mr.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the no confidence motion is bad in law in view of the fact that the grounds on which it was passed, did not find place in the notice of no confidence motion. In support of his contention he placed reliance upon notes (44) in 1964 Maharashtra Law Journal 22. I have perused the orders passed by the authorities below. It is clear that the procedure was followed by the Tahsildar who presided over the meeting in which no confidence motion was passed. The petitioner chose to remain absent in the meeting. I have also perused the 2 proceedings of the meeting and, as observed by both the authorities below, it is clear that the grounds raised in the notice were discussed by members of the panchayat. There is no material on record in support of the contention raised by the petitioners. Even the note (44) in 1964 Maharashtra Law Journal is of no avail to the petitioners in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. The writ petition, accordingly, fails and dismissed as such. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)