IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 6586 of 2008 Between: Vallapu Subba Rao, S/o. Ankamma, R/o. Gullapalli Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 2 The Station House Officer, Maddipadu Police Station, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in calling the Petitioner to the police station time and again without there being any complaint as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to enquire into the matter and take action against the 2nd respondent and to grant such other reliefs or reliefs. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.A.VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.6586 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in calling the petitioner to the police station time and again without there being any complaint as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to enquiry into the matter and take action against the 2nd respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 21.11.2008 v v