C^? )^7 iNl'iE^H^Ha^DK^OECHHATTlgGAiE^^A^gll^iS^ W.P.l§]1So. OF 2011. pgnTioiireR '^•K^ /^^^^•'•^•^ v£^y"3 ....••••' .••"":«*•''' ..-•" Madho Singh Sahu, S/6. Shri Hiru Ram Sahu, aged about 47 years, LieGti-trer, Gpvt. Higher School Chikhlakasa, Block Dondi, District Durg (C.G.) ' VERStTS KESF'ONDiENTS y:'_ •' :._._... ; , ^•'^•':::1:'.:::'''. :::1. State oPGlihattisgarh, ^ . TtirougH : The Secretaty, Tribal WelfMre Depair'ti'nei'it D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C:;. G.) ^ ^ £^ 1< Commissioner, - Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Development Departmeftt Pt. Ravishankar Shukla Premises Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.) 3.' Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Peiisiofi, Durg, Distt. Durg, <C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner nained above begs to submit as undeF:- ^W-'"fT-sysf'^^~:! ^ww »*n^» 7=T -^WM^, ^Ti}-!-l<l<c, lcjdiy^-!, W,?,(£)Mflrl,0'0'T,J[l-r)| (hNlsb SII^T '^CK ('y^y^ff) aii^i ^ift'iw ^TSTT STI^T ffi*||qi TOiWdftnan^r ^iiwfli iiii-i'i''? fyst <r<ri<^i< ^ailwai^i SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shk-ivastava. J. 20-06-2011 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for Shri Y. S. Thakur, Deput' State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing foi| petitioner is entitled to benefit oftwo ad| |the petitioner. |f Advocate General for the the petitioner submits that the /ance increments on account of he having passed B. Ed. examination befoi|e appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in th|! present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finallvj decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena v4. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 MPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his order dated 06-02-1 2008. Learned counsel for the petitic| Court to order dated 29-04-2010 pass| U09 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of ner further draws attention of this 3d in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment ofjthe Supreme Court in the oase of Asha Saxena (sypra) and the order p^ssed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions have b^en issued for consideration of the case for grant oftwo advance incremeifits as per cireular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pracjesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petitjon. Learned counsel for the respojidents submits that now the State Government had issued a circular or| 05-01-2011, which applies in the School Education Department. v vz •!i>->u.;';^9 '3ST'<11<<Kn*),®Tlly'|!o,fs|<rll^^< . W.P.^rvM,7<^3^ SH^T 115RR' ('yt^^) sn^i ^i'f?sfw Wf[ 3n^T^t(ict) Tumane 'P<IWR ^rftH 3»RS?t —2- In view ofthe statement made of with a direction to the respondent claim of the petitioner for grant of two with law, after verification of the faots ofthree months from the date of receipt aM)ve, ple^ded i, this petition is finally disposed autliorities toconsider and decide the akJvance increments jn accordance in the petition withina period y a copy ofthis order. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava V Judge '^'f^f?Pfr;T TfW^ff ^* 'f^Zt •if^i^K ^sifirqsn^i