IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8806 of 2011 RAJAN CHOUDHARY @ RAJAN KUMAR SON OF MR. ARBIND CHAUDHARY. ------------ PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 120B, 341, 324, 326, 307 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioner was named in the F.I.R but, he was not sent up for trial and after examination of 13 witnesses the petitioner has been summoned in exercise of the power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. I am surprise to notice that the learned Additional Judge has considered so many irrelevant submissions but has not discussed the evidences against the petitioner which persuaded the trial court to summon the petitioner under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. Since the accusation was found false by the 2 police during investigation and the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C., let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judge Fast Track Court-V, Begusarai in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 108/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)