IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION Nos. : 13779, 13780,13781 and 13782 of 2008 Writ petition No. 13779 of 2008 Between: Gangula Ramreddy, S/o. Venkatareddy, R/o. Mahaboobabad(Mandal) Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by the District Collector, Warangal. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Excise Department, Warangal. 3 Ganta Mohan Reddy, S/o. Venkata Reddy, Mahaboobabad(Mandal) Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction or Writ more particularly which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in allotting the shop No.57 at Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District to the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, un Constitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also guidelines issued by the 1st respondent Consequently direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the allotment of shop No.57, at Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District in favour of the 3rd respondent and also direct the 2nd respondent to consider the single tender of the petitioner for allotment of shop No.57 at the Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District as per the law and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JALAKAM.SAMPATH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None Writ Petition No. 13780 of 2008 Between: Ganthi Upender Reddy S/o.Pulla Reddy R/o.Mahaboobabad (Mandal) Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the District Collector, Warangal. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Excise Department, Warangal. 3 Shankar 6-2-5/1, Town Road, Kotha Veedi, Mahaboobabad (Mandal), Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction or Writ more particularly which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in allotting the shop No.51 at Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District to the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also guidelines issued by the 1st respondent consequently direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the allotment of shop No.51, at Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District in favour of the 3rd respondent and also direct the 2nd respondent to consider the single tender of the petitioner for allotment of shop No.51 at the Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District as per the law and pass such other orders or order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JALAKAM.SAMPATH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None Writ Petition No. 13781 of 2008 Between: Beravelly Narayana Reddy S/o.Singareddy R/o.Mahaboobabad (Mandal) Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the District Collector, Warangal. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Excise Department, Warangal. 3 Y.Devedar S/o.Hanumanthu 6-2-9/1, Town Road, Kotha Veedi,Narasampet Road Mahaboobabad (Mandal), Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction or Writ more particularly which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in allotting the shop No.51 at Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District to the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also guidelines issued by the 1st respondent consequently direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the allotment of shop No.52, at Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District in favour of the 3rd respondent and also direct the 2nd respondent to consider the single tender of the petitioner for allotment of shop No.52 at the Mahaboobabad Mandal, Warangal District as per the law and pass such other orders or order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JALAKAM.SAMPATH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None And WRIT PETITION No. 13782 of 2008 Between: Kandur Shankar Reddy S/o. Sura Reddy R/o. Mahaboobnagar (M), Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt. of A.P., Rep. by the District Collector, Warangal. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Excise Department, Warangal. 3 Shankar S/o. not Known R/o. 6-2-3/1, Tomren, KothaVeedu, Mahaboobnagar (M), Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction or writ more particularly which is in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in allotting the shop No.53 at Mahaboobnagar Mandal Warangal District to the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, un-constitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and also Guidelines issued by the 1st respondent consequently direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the allotment of shop No.53, at Mahaboobnagar, Warangal District in favour of the 3rd respondent and also direct the 2nd respondent to consider the single tender of the petitioner for allotment of shop No.3 at the Mahaboobnagar Mandal, Warangal district as per the law and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JALAKAM.SAMPATH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent no.3: None The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION Nos :13779,13780,13781 and 13782 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Excise. It is fairly represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that a similar issue as in this writ petition was considered by this Court as presented in Writ Petition No. 13648 of 2008, and the said writ petition was dismissed by the judgment and order dated 27.6.2008 and the said judgment covers these writ petitions also. Accordingly and for reasons alike as recorded in the order in Writ Petition No. 13648 of 2008, dated 27.6.2008, these writ petitions are dismissed. A copy of the judgment in Writ Petition No. 13648 of 2008, dated 27.6.2008, shall be appended to this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 30th June, 2008 Pnb To 1. The District Collector, Warangal. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Excise Department, Warangal. 3. Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Two C.D. copies ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER