IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 3043 of 2009() -------------------------------------- CRIME NO.504/2009 OF IRINJALAKUDE POLICE STATION,THRISSUR PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4: ------------------------------------------- FAISAL, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, KARAPPAN VEETTIL HOUSE, VADAKKUMKARA, VELLANGALLOOR. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI.K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No.3043 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.504/20089 of Irinjalakuda Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 323 & 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is that on 25/04/2009 at 9.45 pm, the petitioner along with other 12 accused persons formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant armed with dangerous weapons like sword, Idikatta and beat the defacto complainant with Idikatta and thereby caused injuries on him and the other accused persons beat the friend of the defacto complainant. In the nature of the allegations leveled against the B.A. No.3043 /2009 2 petitioner and others, I do not think that the petitioner is entitled to get an order for anticipatory bail. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm