HIGH eOURTOFCHHATnSGARH. B1L&BPVR WritAppeal No.l33of2007 P DB: Hpn'ble Shrl Jaedish BhaUai Ag.C.J. Sltti SunU klunar Sialia, yudiise Appellant RB8PONDENT8 Chandra Vijay Jam, s/o Late Shri Piikhraj Jaui,aged about 37 years, posted as shikshd karmi" Vaig-2, at Ctovemiaent Middle School paadatiya; r/o behiad Police Statibu Pandariya, TahsU, Pandanya, Distt. Kawaidha (C.G) yersus 1. CoUector, Kawardha, Distt Kawardha(C.G) 2. Nagar Panohayat, Pan.dariya, through Mukhya N^ar, Panchayat Adhikan, TahsU Paadariya, Distt. Kawardha (C.G) 3. Slate of Chhatdsgarh, Through Secretary Panchayat 85 Social WeUare Department, Govt. of C.G., Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G) 4. Depyly Director of Education, District Kawardha (C.G) 5. Firoja Kureshi, s/o Amir Mohanunad, r/o Paadariya, Tahsil Pandariya, Distt. Kawardtia (C.G) WimnLAPPEAL U/8 2(11 OFTHE HIGH COURT OF caiHATnSGARH ACT 2006 Appearauce: Shri Suresh Paadey, couasel for the appeUant SbriU.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/respoadeuts no. 1, 3 & 4 on advance copy^ Li ^y ORALORDER (13.8.2007) Jaedish Bhalla. Aa.C.J., This writ appeal arises oyt of au order passed in Writ Petidon filed iinderArticle 227 ofthe Gonstitution oflndja. Before coming iuto force ofthe H%h GQurt ofCIihattisgarIi (Appeal to Divisiou Bench) Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act, 2006^, intra. court appeals were beiag filed under fhe piovMions|of the Madhya Pradesh Uchdw. Nyayalaya (Letters Patent Appedls Sampafi) Adhiniyam, 1981. The said provision of Letters Patent £\ ..^e;-^ f.SSSGiSi-gSeKBS-ilvssSE'leSSS,••SSSaiS^Ks'. rgs Appeal was repealed by fheAct, 2006 arui by fhe sanie notification, Chliattisgarh H4?i Court Rules, 2005 came into force wherein the provision of appeal is provided under Rule 2 which is as foUows: ^? ''2. Appeal to the Division Bench of the H^h Court •froin a judgment or order of one Judge of the High Court m.ade in excrcise of ongirtal juiisdiction (1) An appeal stiaU Ue 6xan. a judgraent or order passed by one judge of fhe Hi^h Court in exercise of original jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to a Division Bench coniprisiagoftwoJudgesofthe sam.c high Court: Provided that no such appeal sliaU Ue as.sdD.st aa uiterlocutory order or agaiust aa order passed in exercise of supemsoiy jiirisdiction under Ardcle 227 offhe Constitution oflndia. (2) Aa appeal under sub-section (1) shatlbe filed within 45 days fi?om the date oforderpassedby a Singte Judge. Provided that any appeal inay be admitted after fhe prescribed period of 45 days, if the petitioner satisfies the Dwiston Bench fhat he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal witlun such period. Explaaation:- The fa.at that the petitioner was luisled by any order, practice or judynent of fhe H^h Court in aseertauung fhe prescribed period niay by suf&cient cause within. the meaniag of this sub-section," Froin the perusal of fhe aforesaid provision, it is ciyslal clear that no appeal shaU Ue against an order passed in exercise of supervlsoiy junsdiction uiider Article 227 of the Constitution oflndia. Same view has been taken by a Division Bench ofthis Court in W.A(P.R.) No.3486/2007, ia whlch one ofus (Hori'ble Shri Jagdish BhaUa, Acting ChiefJustice) is a Member. In lightoffhe above discussion, intra court appeal is not maintamable ^aiast fhe order passed ia exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 offhe Cbnstitution of India. AGcordiagIy, this writ appealis dismtssed. pActing ChIefJusilce1 Sd/- Sunii Kumar Sinha Judge \s'iFW^'5^w^ F^m-y^FsrrF^H^^ •!fc3^^:^:;^i^s:aL.^KE.' :-.s&^,