IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. 142- /2011 ^ (Arising out ofCivil Revision No. 85/2010) APPLICANT REVISIONER v\\ ..< y/: ^o-- ^' ^: 'y^ Maniram Tamrakar, S/o. Shri Lokman Prasad Tamrakar, Aged about 58 years, R/o. Infront of House of Vijay Kumar Tamrakar, Jabrapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.). ./-^ NON-APPICANTS RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. Kunj Bihari Gahwai, Aged about 40 years, S/o. Late Dhanushram Gahwai. 2. Ras Bihari Gahwai, Aged about 35 years, S/o. Late Dhanushram Gahwai. 3. Vipin Bihari Gahwai, Aged about 40 years, S/o. Late Dhanushram Gahwai. 4. Smt. Kanti Bai Gahwai, Aged about 70 years, W/o. Late Dhanushram Gahwai. 5. Smt. Kirti Lali Gahwai, Aged about 40 years, D/o. Late Dhanushram Gahwai. All R/o. Village Piparload, Patralaya Bawali, Tahsil Mungeli, District Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION QFTHECASE T' WWIT ^sr -4|<4ld<LI, ^Tll^^t^, R«rtWll< 3TT^T T(5^F? ^^.,^&......4U.^/.^ "^^ST' 200 3TT^T^T f^iN k»»' ^^rww^r -^' Sahu 3TT^?I ^<T1[^H: ^f^T s.u; tloiriiie »nnJUSticeT?.K: Aga 24.03,2011 restor^tion fo^- 85/2t)10 Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Ad'| Heard on application for Leamed counsel appearing counsel for the applicant could notj mistake, therefore, C.R, No. 11.02.2011, may be restored to its orij On due consideration, I am| applicant has succeeded in explainiij therefore, the application is allowed to its original file. A copy ofthis order be placed and the same be listed for hearing. ehl«t<n<i1rt'RTTO!f ^ f^S <r5t^i< iFsrf^R^n^r wai ^ocate for applicant. [ ofC.R. No. 85/2010. the applicant submits that the appear on account of bonafide lpl0/which was dismissed cn anal file. satisfied that the counsel for ^g the cause of his/her absence, W C.R. No. 85/2010 is restored jon record ofthe original revision Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge r^ ^^r