IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION NO : 24135 of 2007 DATE:03.12.2007 Between: Sabeera Begum ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Station House Officer, Madannapet Police Station, Madannapet, Hyderabad District, and another. .....RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) The petitioner, who is the mother of the alleged detenu, namely, Mohd. Hameed Khan, sent a telegram to the Hon’ble Chief Justice on 6.11.2007 alleging that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Madannapet Police Station is harassing her son to execute some documents in favour of one Mujeebunnisa begum, and on 6.11.2007 at 11.00 am the police along with Mujeebunnisa Begum came to her house and forcibly took away her son and she apprehends danger to his life in the hands of Police. She also apprehends that they will coerce her son to execute some false documents in their favour. On the basis of the above telegram the present writ petition has been taken up and issued notices to the respondents. In response to the notice, the Inspector of Police, Madannapet Police Station, the first respondent herein, filed counter affidavit stating that the alleged detenu is an accused in Crime No.131 of 2007 registered on 26.10.2007 for the offence under Section 420 IPC, basing on the complaint given by one Smt. Mujeebunnisa Begum and took up investigation. From the date of registration of the said crime the alleged detenu has been absconding. The petitioner being the mother of the alleged detenu, issued the present telegram on 6.11.2007. After issuing the telegram, the alleged detenu moved an anticipatory bail application on 7.11.2007 before the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in Crl.M.P.No.3023 of 2007, and the learned Sessions Judge by order dated 26.11.2007 granted anticipatory bail to the alleged detenu on condition of his executing a bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer with a condition that he should make himself available for interrogation by the Police Officer as and when required. The anticipatory bail application and the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge filed along with the counter affidavit also disclose that the alleged detenu was not illegally arrested by the police as alleged by the petitioner. In view of the same, we see no truth in the telegram sent by the petitioner alleging that his son was illegally arrested by the police. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. ____________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) ______________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.) 3rd December, 2007 Js.