1 S.B.Cr.Misc. IInd Bail Appli. No.934/2008 (Shyam Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 03, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Suresh Kumbhat, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that after rejecting the first bail application, the parties have compromised the matter and minor Mayur has been handed over by Babu Lal, who is grandfather, to the complainant Aarti and Aarti has no objection if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail. It is stated that Aarti appeared before the learned Sessions Judge and made such statements. In the circumstances, therefore, I consider it just and proper to set aside the order impugned and remand the matter to the Additional Sessions Judge, Sojat to pass a fresh order, if the complainant Aarti appears before that Court and 2 makes such statement. The bail application filed by the petitioner is accordingly disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-