In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.6740 of 2008 Santosh Kumar Sah & Ors. Vrs. The State of Bihar & Anr. **** /5/ 10.07.2008 Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application. 2.Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 3. Petitioner no. 1, Santosh Kumar Sah, is the husband, petitioners no. 2 and 3, Bhola Prasad and Rekha Devi, are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant. They are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1682 C of 2007 registered under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioners submits that in spite of several persuasion even the complainant was not ready to live with petitioner no. 1. He filed Matrimonial Case No. 141 of 2006 for dissolution of marriage. As a counter blast, present complaint case has been filed. It has also been stated that in stead of all these facts, the husband is still ready to lead conjugal life with the complainant, if she is ready to live. 4. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, above named, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with the aforementioned case to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )