fflGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2544 ( S.L.Dwivedi, aged about 43 years, son of Shri M.L.Dwivedi, B/o. F-1, In-igationColony, Katghora, Distt.Korba(CG) VERSU8 ' : 1. State of CUhattisgarh, fhrough the Secretary, Department of Water Resourees, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan,Raipur (C©) 2. Additional Seeretary, Department of Water Resources, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3. Chief Enguieer, Deptt ofWater Resources, Siliava Raipw(CG) 4. Executive Engineer, Deptt of Wafer Resourees, Water Resources Divisiori — Korba Distt. Korba (CG) :.,.1 , , • '. , , . : 5. A.K.Gautam, son of Shri Dwarika Prasad Gautam, R/o H-26, Irrigation Colony, Rampur, Korba Distt. Korba(CG) WRITj'ETmONJJNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihofri. J. Present: SlmP.S.Koshy, Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govenmient Advocate for fhe StaW respondentNo. 1 to'4. . ORALORDER (Passed on 05m day ofMay, 2008) The petitioner, being aggrieved by ttie impugaed order dated 26.3.2008 (Aimexure P/l), filedawritpetitionbeingW.P.(S) No. 1922/2008 m fhis Court. On the request of leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner was graated liberty to make a representation to the concemed authority. " According to Shri Koshy, fhe representation dated 03.04.2008 (Amiexure P/6) was aecordingly made .to the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govemment of Chhattisgarh. No decisionhas 4. been taken though the period oftwo weeks yauted is already over. Smce therepresentation is pending consideration before the Secretary, Water Resources Department, it is expedient to directthe respondent- authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously purauant to the earlier order dated 31 March, 2008 within a period of extended two weeks time from today. Since the deeision could not be taken as per the order dated 31 March, 2008 passed earlier, status quo, in regard to placement ofthe petitioaer, as obtains today, shall be maiatained till the disposal of the representation by the authorities concenied. Wifh fhe aforesaid directiotL this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. /~ Sd/- SatishK.AgnUioO-i ^j Judge Aimt ^.. :.iS:asssisS^^s»&saess:iaeaeati