IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19240 of 2010 MUSAFIR RAI, S/O Brahamdeo Rai, resident of Village- Shantipur, P.S. Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur.................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 27.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 23.01.2010 in connection with a case registered under Sections 363, 366A, 368 and 120B of the I.P.C. It is alleged against one Manjay Rai who enticed away the informant’s daughter and one another girl Rani Kumari. It is alleged that initially Rani Kumari took the daughter of the informant. During investigation and in 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim it has come that it was house of the petitioner where the victim was kept. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner for the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner, Musafir Rai, be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sakara P.S. Case No. 25 of 2010. It is made clear that the learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur will not accept the bail bond of the petitioner if it is found that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)