1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.165 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2810 OF 1998 Rajesh Keshav Makhija .. Plaintiff Versus Paresh Kantilal Mamtora & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.J.J.Thakkar for plaintiff Mr.S.K.Jain for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 25th November 2008 P.C. . Motion to be heard along with main suit. 2. At the request of Mr.Thakkar, plaintiff in Suit No.2810 of 1998 and defendant No.1 to Counter Claim No.98 of 2007, two weeks’ time is granted to file written statement to counter claim. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.75 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2810 OF 1998 Rajesh Keshav Makhija .. Plaintiff Versus Paresh Kantilal Mamtora & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.J.J.Thakkar for plaintiff Mr.S.K.Jain for defendants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 25th November 2008 P.C. . By consent chamber summons No.75 of 2008 is taken on board. Heard. 2. In this Chamber Summons the prayer is that plaintiffs to the counter claim should give inspection of the documents relied upon in the Counter Claim to the defendants thereto/plaintiffs in the suit. 3 2. Mr.Jain after taking instructions from the plaintiffs to the counter claim, makes a statement that the plaintiffs to the counter claim are relying upon the very documents to support their claim which are relied upon by the plaintiffs in Suit No.2810 of 1998 to support their claim. 3. In such circumstances and when no other documents are being relied upon in support of the Counter claim as stated by Mr.Jain, this chamber summons does not survive and the same stands disposed of accordingly. ( S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)