IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21495 of 2004 Between : P.Bharathi W/o.sri.P.Ramesh, R/o.H.No.1-8-607/77, Atchaiah Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, Central Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd., Operation North Circle, Mint Cpmpound, Hyderabad. 2 Muncipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Commissioner, Secunderabad Divison, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in refusing to grant electricity connection to the building bearing House No. 12-13-653, in survey No. 163/A and 164, at Nagarjuna Nagar, Tarnaka, Secunderabad, by as illegal, highhanded and arbitrary and consequently to direct the Respondent NO. 1 to provide electricity connection to the above referred premises. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.N.CHANDRADHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER : When the matter is taken up today, it is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents that electricity Service Connection is already provided to the petitioner’s building bearing house No. 12-13-653 situated in survey No. 163/A and 164 of Nagarjuna Nagar, Tarnaka, Secunderabad. 2. In view of the said submission, no further adjudication is necessary in the matter, and this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to continue power supply to the petitioner’s building, as per the terms and conditions of supply. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th June 2009 ajr