IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.175/1996 KANHOBA KHUTEMATE ..VS.. RAJKUMAR TIPLE Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 2 /12 / 2010 It appears form the office note dated 16.6.2010 that the notice issued to the sole appellant on appearance was received back unserved as he was reported to be dead. Thereafter, it was noticed that the respondent had also expired. Time was granted to Shri K.R. Lambat, the learned counsel who appeared for the appellant before the matter was remitted to the District Court to remove office objection and take the requisite steps to bring the L.Rs. of deceased appellant on record. None appeared on behalf of the appellant and the respondents on more than a couple of occasions. Thereafter, though time was granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to remove the office objection as a last chance, the office objection is not removed till this date. Shri Munje, the learned counsel holding for Shri K.R. Lambat, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant states that the legal heirs of the appellant had not contacted the learned counsel. In such circumstances, the first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE SMP.