IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7818 of 2009 Date of Decision: May 21, 2009 Rakesh Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner is aggrieved of the action of the respondents in showing his basic pay to be Rs. 6725/- instead of Rs.6900/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has issued legal notice Annexure P-5 and without deciding the same recovery is being threatened. In my opinion the ends of justice would be met if the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the legal notice of the petitioner by passing a speaking order thereon or before taking any action to initiate recovery against the petitioner. Consequently this writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Let the needful be done within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 21, 2009 sunita