IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 755 OF 2010 IN CROSS OBJECTION NO. 5 OF 2008 M/S. DELCON ENGINEERING THROUGH PARTNER T. D. AHMED ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 27th October, 2010 P.C. 1. By this application under Order XLI Rule 27 of Civil Procedure Code, the applicant seeks to produce on record one letter dated 4th August, 2000 as an additional evidence. The issues in the matter were framed on 15th December, 2004 and recording of the evidence commenced thereafter. The document sought to be produced is of the year 2000. It was in possession of the applicant and therefore the applicant could have and ought to have produced the same before the trial Court. No satisfactory reason has been assigned for non-production of the document. 2. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the question relating to 175 barrels was not relevant for the trial however in para 25 of the decision of the learned Judge referred to the 175 barrels. Hence the production be allowed. We have perused the written statement wherein the point regarding 175 barrels has been specifically raised. In the circumstances the plaintiff ought to have produced this document in the trial Court. The application is therefore rejected. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*