IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41415 of 2010 LAL BIHARI MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 15.03.2011. Heard. The case is under Section 302 etc IPC and the allegation against the petitioner is that he dealt a farsa blow on the head of the deceased. The doctor holding postmortem examination found the injury which was as serious as could be indicated by this fact that there was the fracture of left temporal and occipital bones measuring 26 cm x 20 cm. The contention was that the wife of the deceased was naming another person, namely, Anup Mahto as the assailant of her husband. But when this court considers the above statement in the light of the statement of the informant in the FIR, it is found that the informant had stated that his mother and wife had arrived at the scene of occurrence quite some times after the main assault on the deceased was over, considering which the prayer is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)