CWP (T) No. 14736 of 2008 11.11.2009 Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for respondent No.3. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. degree from Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak in June, 1996. The respondents have decided to fill up the posts of TGT. The interviews were fixed on 3.11.2006. The name of petitioner was sponsored by respondent No.4. She did not receive any call letter as per averments contained in the Petition. However, in the reply of respondents No. 1 and 2, it has come that the letter was duly addressed to the petitioner and was sent under UPC cover on 19th October, 2006. There is a presumption under Section 26 of the General Clauses Act that the petitioner has received the letter. Moreover, the petitioner has not chosen to file any rejoinder. Consequently, there is no merit in the Writ Petition. The same is dismissed. ( R.B. Misra ), Acting Chief Justice. November 11, 2009. ( Rajiv Sharma), (rks) Judge.