^-u .//'l L./ c^ IN THE caase^SK. HON'BLE HIGH COURT OP CHHAITISGARH xi; MLASPUR WREC PETITION N0. 2^-^ff /2003. psrmoNER .-'•• {.^^ ^J^-'' /•' ey(k'<~fe>'>r'' ,.^y <<^'-/" aSSPONDEHTS Hohaa Lal Railwar Son of .ehai'tu Raikwar aged abeutg^years Office Peon in the District Offiee of Panehayat and Samaj Kalyaa Departmeat >Tanjgir-Cbansia* (C.G.) Resident a-b Maia Ro&d Janjgir- Cha%>a (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS ^^f03 i !• S-fcate of Chhattisgarb Throagh s Its Chief Seeretrary D.K.S. Bbawaa Raipur. 2» Comml.ssioner* Panehayat and Samaj Sewa Saachnalaya* Kalyan ./ . • ' ' ' ' ' . . . . Singh Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Direetor of Pancbayat and SareaJ Sewa District Janjgir Chan^>a (Chhattisgarh) 4. State of M.P. Through s Its Chl.ef Sseretaary Ballabh-Bhawan Bh6gal (M.p.) 5. Connissl.oner, Panchayati and Samaj Sewa » Saachanala^a of,.M.P v~\ __ CoBtd....2..»« ^ 2 - 6. Govemment , Bhqgal (M.P.) Unioa of Indla» Ihroagh » Its Peisonnel Department Kew Delhi. WRCT PCTITXONER USDER ABS'ICLSS 226 AND 227 OP THE CONgEirUTION OP INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF APPROPiaiErE WRISS IH THE laaa'URBOF-MAHDAMES CEKSIORAEI AND PMHIBIBION AND/OR aTHER APPROPRIAIE ORDERS. i^. ~'& !|!i"|(lll* „ ^S vif~ .:<%».1 ViSSf t '~-< ;!8H mOH COURT OF CHHATTI^jARH AT_BILASPUR WRIT PETmON No. 2120 of2003 PETmONER : MohanLalRaikwar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Wnt Petition Unda- Article 226 And 227 CtfThe C(»stituti<mOflndia SB: Hon'ble Shri Satidi K. Aanthotri. J. Present: Shri Suresh'Pandey, Advocate far the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A.G. forlfae State. Shri Anand Vama, Advocate forthe respandentNo. 6. ORALORDER (Passed on 22"' day ofMaidi, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appeaiiag far the petitiona, on instructions, subnuts that the petitioiiCT do^ not waat te press this petition. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for oAer side have ao objection. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is disanissed as aot pressed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge /umt