pvr 1 A1014-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.1014 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.191 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.52 OF 2008 1.Devkabai Yeshwant Keni & Anr. ...Appellants vs. 1.Sunita Anant Mahant & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.R.B.Singh, for Appellants. Mr.P.Majumdar i/b. M/s.M.P.Savla & Co., for Respondent no.24. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED: 13th June,2011 pvr 2 A1014-10 P.C.: 1. By this appeal, the appellants challenge the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 23.11.2009 dismissing Notice of motion no. 191 of 2009. On that notice of motion, ad- interim order was refused by order dated 20.3.2009. The learned Single Judge has finally disposed of that notice of motion treating order dated 20.3.2009 as a final order. Though the course of action adopted by the learned Single Judge is not strictly in accordance with law, we have heard the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides treating order dated 20.3.2009 as final order. We find from the record that the learned Single Judge is perfectly justified in disposing of the notice of motion. The plaintiffs, it appears, has no prima facie case. The plaintiffs have received money from his bank account in the year 1994 and the suit has been filed in the year 2008 and there is no explanation found for receiving money from his bank account. In our pvr 3 A1014-10 opinion, therefore, the learned Single Judge is justified in disposing of the notice of motion. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.G.KETKAR,J.)