IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5823 of 2011 1. DINESH YADAV 2. Bishnu Yadav, Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, deceased left his home in the company of petitioners and subsequently he was found in unconscious state and disclosed the name of these petitioners. Even if the aforesaid fact assumed to be true then also, it is a case of last seen only and so far as uttering the name of these petitioners by the deceased before his death is concerned, according to the prosecution case itself, the deceased had uttered only the name of these petitioners and he has stated nothing in respect of his murder. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties ,let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Amour P.S.Case No. 110/2010. Nitesh (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)