HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAIVI: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Petition No.502212005 (Public interest Litigation) 1. Sundar Sai, aged about 5O years, son of Shri Fate Singh, r/o vill Nang Daraha, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) (On alc of death of his son Moharam, aged about 14 years) PETITIONER$ 2. Son Sai, son of Kasduliha, aged about 47 years, r/o viii Nang Daraha, Tah‘ Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) (death of his son Chandan, aged about 18 years,) 3‘ Chaitram, aged about 47 years, son of Rodu, r/o vill Nang Daraha, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) (death of his son Lachhinder, aged about 13 years,) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, thru» Secretary, Department of Viitage Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Union of lndia, through — Secretary, Ministry of Social Welfare and Rural Development, New Delhi. 3. The Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Collector, District Ralgarh (C.G.) 5. Tahsildar, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) — 6. Lok Pal Singh, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Madan Singh, R/o viii. Nang 7 Daraha, Dharamjaigarh, District. Raigarh (C.G.) (Stone breaker Contractor) Writ Petition Under Article 2261227 of the Constitution of India Present: Shri A.N. Bhakta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, learned Deputy Advocate Genera! for respondents No.1 ,3,4, and 5. Shri Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No.6. ORDER (23m July, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri A.N. Bhakta, learned counsel for the petitioners in View of the orders passed by the Collector, Raigarh during the pendency of the writ petition and the fact that the petitioners have already approached the Commissioner for Workman Compensation for payment of compensation, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another writ petition if the future developments so warrant. 2. Permission granted. 3. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Consequently, M.(C).P. No. 4057/2005 also stands dismissed subbu as withdrawn. Sdl- Sdl- . Sunil Kumar Sinha chief Jusu'ce Judge