IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 299 OF 2009 MASCARENHAS TOMAS ANTONIO ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. T. George John, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1, 2, 5 and 6. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. E. Dias, Advocate for respondents No.7 and 8. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 5th July, 2010 P.C. :- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The grievance in the petition is as regards the alleged illegalities committed while constructing a building. There is a serious contest on the locus of the petitioner. It is contended that a suit has been filed in the Civil Court containing similar allegations in which an injunction has been denied and the present petitioner has been set up by the unsuccessful plaintiffs. 2. However, it is not necessary to go into the wider controversy. There is an affidavit filed on record by the North Goa Planning and Development Authority, in which it is stated that the said Authority will inspect the building prior to granting a completion certificate and if any deviations are found, then the completion certificate will not be granted. There is also an affidavit filed by the Corporation of the City of Panaji stating that the grievances can be looked into at the time of grant of an occupancy certificate. 3. In view of the statements of the Planning Authority and the Corporation, it is not necessary to entertain the petition. The statements are accepted. The petition is disposed of by keeping all contentions open. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.