C^ f^ IN^HE HIGH CQURT^F JUDICATURE OFLCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) N0. k/S /2010(S.B.) PETITIONER / Rameshwar Lal Sahu S/o Shri Baldau Ram Sahu, Aged about 54 years, Office of the Forest Division Kawardha^ District Kabirdham (C.G.) cb VERSUS <:•• RESPONDENT )oy^9f ^':r^'».)•' ^^y ^ Q?-; / 1) State of Chhattisgarh Though : The Secretary Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Chief Conser^ator of Forest, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Forest Conservator, Di-u-g Circle Division Durg, Distnct Durg(C.G.) 4) The S.D.O. (Forest) Forest Division Kawardha Distriet Kabirdham (C.G.) 5) Radheshyam Agrawal occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Porest Circle, District Durg (C.G.) T ^6) Ramanuj Patel occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Rajnandgaon Forest Circle, Dista-ict Rajnandgaon(C.G.) / 7) Chamru Rain Madharia Qccupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Porest Circle, District RajanndgaQn (C.G.) / 8) Kamal Narayan Sahu occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Khairagarh Forest Circle, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / 9) Khamhan Dadsena occupation Deputy Forest Ranger, Diu-g Forest Circle, District Durg (C.G.) ., 10) Y. Ramcliandra Rao Qccupation Deputy Porest Ranger, Khairagarh Forest Circle, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA n. »11*1MI (hHra? ^=T ^•lli(Td;T,yal'H'ss, fsldiy1!,'!, -ff^-^fS I^' •-^1,200 3n^iTpRT (1pf3»i^r) 3'I^T qil'f^fRT ^SfT ^TT^T 9h*iiqi -^ ^ ?wiw ^ifer ati^i SB_:_H^:'BI,B_MR.,_JUSTJCB_?RJT_I1 23.1Q.2010 Shri Bharat Ramut, counsel f( Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. for th Grievance of the petitioner in working as Porester and is due for Forest Ranger. AccordinE; to the counsel for t 10, who are junior to him have bc Detitioner has been ignored for no t aiready made representation dated same has not been decided till datc justice would be served if direction is deciding his pending representation. State counsel submits that representation to the reso. No.2 accordance with law considering f.he| Accordingly, the petitioner is with the aforesaid liberty. in representation by the petitioner witi'l date of receipt of copy ot' this.order t| same wouid be decided by the au| period ofthree months in an obiectitl it is made clear that this COLJ on merits of the case and the autho) to decide the reuresentation sti| considerin.e all the asoects of the ca^ +l<lf<'f<i1-l qiiRff if -fetzt <fa(<;l< ^aiRmgii?! tr the petltioner. ^ State/resps. 1 to 4. •the present Detition is that he is •his promotion to the post of Dv. he petitioner, respondents No. 5 to |en promoted but the case ot' the bult of his. He subinits that he has 13.9.09 (annexure P.4) but the I. He further submits that ends of issued to the respondent N0.2 for iet. the petitioner make a fresh aifcd the same zvould be decided in lentitiement of the petitioner. Ipermitted to withdraw the petition jthe eventuality of 'filing tresh 1-t.n a oeriod of three weeks from the b resp. No.2, it is expected that the Ihority concemed within a further manner. |rt has not expressed anv opinion 1-ity concerned would be at Uberty ictlv in accordance with iaw. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge