hvn 1 908/apl/1000.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1000 OF 2011 Deepak Sevantilal Javeri and anr. ... Applicants Versus Suresh Narsingdas Patel and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.V. Marwadi, i/by Mohanty & Associates, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Yogesh P. Yagnik, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and respondent No. 1. 2. The matter is settled between the parties. The consent terms are signed and submitted by the parties including counsel. The same are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Respondent/original complainant present in the court and identified by the learned counsel. The controversy is for offence under section 406, 420 read with 34 and hvn 2 908/apl/1000.11 387, 506 of I.P.C. Since the matter is settled and not involving any public policy as such, the proceedings vide case No.3517/PW/2005 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri stands quashed and set aside. Consequently non-bailable warrant, if any pending is also recalled. Criminal Application disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)