WP(C) 5382/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA I have heard Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. U.K. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure-6 notice dated 20.4.2007 issued by the respondent No. 5 directing him to remove the shop within 12.5.2007. it wa s stated in the notice that in case of failure on the part of the petitioner, le gal action would be taken. The petitioner sent legal notice dated 27.4.2007 for the respondent No. 5 against the aforesaid notice interalia stating that he is not occupying any la nd of the school but has been occupying land belonging to PWD. After about 6 mon ths of issuance of the impugned notice, the petitioner has approached this Court . Without expressing any opinion on merit of the case of the petitioner, I dispose of the writ petition providing that it will be open for the respondents to take action in the matter in accordance with law. If the petitioner is liabl e to be evicted from the land, same may be done in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of.