IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24834 of 2009 Vidya Sagar Singh, son of Ram Lagan Singh, village Singhara, PS Mahua, district Vaishali – petitioner. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Mostt. Sohagan Devi, wife of Late Hardeo Singh, village Singhara, PS Mahua, district Vaishali – opp. parties. 2 29.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 27.12.2008 passed by the Subdivisional Magistrate, Mahua in Case No. 383/2008 as well as the order, dated 5.3.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Vaishali in Cr. Revision No. 9/2009. This court directs that the petitioner should appear before the court of the Subdivisional Magistrate, Mahua to take up the matter to decide 145 Cr.P.C. proceeding expeditiously within a period of four months considering the fact that it is not proper to attach large tracts (1 acre) of agricultural land. It would not be beneficial for the petitioner or the opposite party as both of them would be deprived from utilizing the land, growing crops, irrigating it etc. It should not be very difficult for the court to decide the question of possession because as per the order sheet it is accepted that the Ist party has 1/4th share in the said land which is accepted by the 2nd party in paragraph 10 of the petition under section 145 Cr.P.C. It may be observed here that the Court may direct that the undisputed portion of the land should be utilised by the person who is admittedly in possession over the same. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)