IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 9694 of 2008(D) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. A.P.GEORGE, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.A.K.POULOSE, AMBOOKKEN HOUSE, WEST CHALAKKUDI. 2. JESSY JOSEPH, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.JOSEPH KATTAKKAYAM HOUSE, VELLIKULANGARA, VIA.KODAKARA. 3. MARY JACOB, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.JAISON AVIRACHEN, MENACHERRY HOUSE, ASOKAPURAM, ALWAYE. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL) SRI.K.J.CHACKOCHAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, ALWAYE. 2. SALES TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, ALWAYE. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/06/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC : 9694 OF 2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF KGST ASSESSMENT DT.25.05.02 EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF CST ASSESSMENT DT.25.5.02. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF R.R. DEMAND NOTICE U/S. 7 OF R.R. ACT. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE U/S.34 OF R.R. ACT. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 18.11.2004 FOR PAYMENT OF RS.50,000/-. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY JUDGMENT IN OP NO.4489/03 DATED 20.10.2004. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE. K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 9694 OF 2008 D ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners approached this Court challenging Exts.P3 and P4 which are notices issued under the Revenue Recovery Act. According to the petitioners, by Ext.P6 judgment, Exts.P1 to P4 are virtually cancelled and there must be a re-assessment order. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. He submits that a modified assessment order is passed under which the petitioners are liable to pay Rs.34,234/-. But, it is pointed out that the order is not served on the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader submits that the order will be served on the petitioners within two weeks from today, if not already served. In such circumstances, the interim order will continue for a period of six weeks so that in the meantime the petitioners can avail the remedy. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks