W.P. No.20564/2011 10.12.2011 Shri Gopal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. It is the contention of the petitioners that they were appointed vide order 12.08.1998 as is clear from Annexure P-1, P-2 and P-3, yet while issuing the gradation list of all such persons, before the name of the petitioners wrong date of appointment has been mentioned. Though a representation has been made but the same has not yet been decided therefore, they have come before this Court. The basis on which the gradation list has been prepared by the respondent authorities is not clear. The covering memo itself prescribes that in case, there is an error in mentioning any facts in the gradation list, the person concerned can make a representation. If such representation is made by the writ petitioners, the respondents-authorities are duty bound to consider the same and decide according to law. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners expeditiously within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioners are directed to furnish a copy of the representations together with all the relevant documents as also the certified copy of the order passed today within a week before the respondent No.3 and 4, who will look into the matter and will pass the order on the representations of the petitioners and communicate the same to the petitioners within the aforesaid period. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra