Wm nizoo mm (Wu) mmm WW1¥WW amifmm 8.3. V HON’BLE WRIT SR1 PETITIO DHIREEQRA [C1 No.2939l2008 MISHRA, J V Writ gétition under Artinle 226 of the Constitution of :[ndia Santosin Chand Parakh, S/o Shri PETITIONERS 1 . years, Advocate 85 Notary, R/o Jawahar , Para alod, District- Durg (CG)' Fatto chand Jain, S/o late Shri \Go?ic d Jain, aged about 42 years, Malchandji Parakh, aged about 65 years, Advocate & Notary, R/o Station Road, Balod, District—Dulg (CG) Narayan Sharma, S/o Shri Dhan Diwan, aged about 68 years, Advocate & Notary, R/o near y Masz Balod, District-Burg (CG) ar Kaur Sandhu, W/o Shri it Singh, aged about 45 years, Advo'c te 8s Notary, R/o Dani Rajhara, Tahsil Balod, District-Burg (CG) Jwala Prasad Dewangan, S/o Shri Sh Lal Dewangan, aged about 5O ‘ d y i Ward No 5 Balod D1stnct Durg, (CG) Versus 1. RESPONDENTS 26.6.2008 counsel for the petitioners. Shri Awadh Tripathi, AG for the State. Sri h WS Murthy, Dy. The peitioners who dues of Notary 111 Balod fo th followg rehef(s) f Chhatiisgarh, through Minisu'y Department of Legal Affairs. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, are advocates and discharging the lDlstt Durg, have filed thls peuuon /_ Advocate & Notary R/o Naya Para, 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary Law & Legislative Department, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District-Raipur 3. District Judge, Durg, District Durg 4. President, Tahsil Bar Association Baloc', District—Burg (CG) t tl r e m o y WTm m 200 mm (We) 2, a; armm gz/ m in zoo amm (W) WWW WM§WW 3 asaimm / WWW «1mm 1. That, this Hon’ble Caurt may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in ths nature of CER’I‘IORARI by quashjng the impugrxed order dated 23.5.2008, i.e. (Annexure P- 1) h relates to the creating additional post of N 2 post at Balod and l post of Dam Rajhara. 2. That, the respondent may kindly be directed to creat additional post of N in a needed place i.e. Tahsil Bemetara, Guderdehi Dhamdha, Guroor 3: Anv other rehef wh1 h mav be smtable 1n the facts and Circumstances o the case, may also be granted Grievance of the petitioner is that there are six sanctioned posts of Notary at Balod appointed against the d ” the petitiongs have been/4 c e o tioned posts. However, the respondent/State Without re being any necessity of posting additional three N s, have sanctioned three posts of Notaries at Balod and tha too, Without prior approval of the District Judge, Durg an therefore, the petitioners have praved for quashing of the o der dated 23 5 2008 (Annexure mwmgavm, W ‘ ’ ire/197412008 —40,ooo. W t \ H m w 'c o o s e mm ' “a1 zoo r r