[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO. 129/2007 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3373/2004 ANIL KUMAR Vs. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR & ANR. DATE: 29.11.2007. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Lokesh Sharma for the review-petitioner. **** Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner. The review petitioner has pointed out a mistake that in para Nos. 4 and 5 of the judgment dated 24.10.2007 passed by this Court, the date of R.T.A's order has wrongly been mentioned as 19.06.2004 instead of 19.06.2000, therefore, the same may be read as 19.06.2000. Further the review petitioner submits the since third renewal application is pending consideration before the respondents, this Court has not issued any direction to consider the same. [2] I am not convinced with the submissions made on behalf of the review petitioner to issue any direction in this regard. It is implied that if any application is moved, the authority concerned is required to consider the same, but no direction is required to be issued by this Court. In view of the observations made herein above, I find no merit in the review petition except to correct the date of order passed by the R.T.A. as 19.06.2000 instead of 19.06.2004 in the judgment dated 24.10.2007 passed by this Court. The review petition stands disposed of accordingly. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/