IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10233 of 2006 RATNESHWAR PRASAD KARN, aged about 42 years, S/O-Sri Rupnarayan Lal Das, R/O-Vill-Piprahi, P.O.-Jiya Ram Raghopur, Distt.- Supaul. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, New Secretariate, Patna. 3. The Director in Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Director, Health Services, (T.B.), Bihar, Patna. 5. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Samastipur. 6. The District T.B. Officer, District T.B. Centre, Samastipur. 7. The In charge Medical Officer, Additional T.B. Centre, Rosera, Samastipur. …..Respondents. ----------- 2/ 14.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Dr. Amar Nath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this writ application the petitioner has prayed for a direction to reinstate the petitioner in service as was done in the case of one Ramesh Prasad and Narendra Kumar Singh in view of the order dated 8.7.2003 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2251 of 1993 as contained in Annexure – 10 to the writ application. He submits that the petitioner has already filed representation for the purpose before respondent no. 5, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure 7 and he prays 2 that this writ application may be disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 5 to consider the same. However, learned counsel for the State pointed out that against the said dismissal order the petitioner had moved this court earlier twice. Copies of the orders are annexed as Annexure – 6 and 8/2. He submits that in both the cases, after making some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application. Accordingly, both the applications were dismissed as withdrawn. He submits that it is third attempt by the petitioner for the same cause of action, which is an abuse of the process of court. Dr. Singh has failed to point out any new cause of action arisen for the petitioner to move this Court again. In the circumstances, this Court finds that this writ application, filed in this court for the same cause of action is an abuse of the process of the court and therefore, this writ application is dismissed with cost of Rs.1,000/-. DKS/ (J. N. Singh, J.)