IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 34669 of 2010(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M.R. USHADEVI, RATIONING INSPECTOR, TALUK SUPPLY OFFICE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, THRISSUR. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 34669 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is now working as Rationing Inspector in the Taluk Supply Office, Thrissur. The employees of the Civil Supplies Department are being deputed to work in the Kerala Civil Supplies Corporation. Certain guidelines have been prescribed for such deputation. According to the petitioner, after the employee attains the age of 53 years he/she cannot be so deputed. The petitioner submits that, contrary to the guidelines, the petitioner has now been ordered to be again deputed to Civil Supplies Corporation. Against the same, the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 as expeditiously as possible. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with W.P.(C)No. 34669 of 2010 -2- a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. If ultimately the 1st respondent accepts the contention of the petitioner, even if the petitioner is relieved pursuant to Ext.P3 order, the petitioner shall be reverted to the Department. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/