S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 909/2008 (M/s Inderjeet Choda vs. State of Raj.) DATE OF ORDER : 13/7/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.M.S.Panwar, for the appellant. Mr.Yashpal Khileree, for the respondent. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26/5/2008 passed by the learned District Judge, Ganganagar under Section 9 (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whereby, the prayer for interim relief by the contractor petitioner was rejected. It is well settled law that interference by Court in arbitration matters under the Act of 1996 is very limited and for disputes of urgent and emergent nature the parties to the arbitration can approach the Court under Section 9 (e) of the Act. It appears in the facts and circumstances of the case that this appeal is unnecessarily pending before this Court. Since the dispute is admittedly pending before the learned Arbitrator and both the parties are represented their, this appeal is disposed of by directing the learned Arbitrator to proceed expeditiously with the arbitration proceedings and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year from today. In the facts and circumstances of the case, recovery of amount in question from the petitioner contractor in the present case shall remain stayed till Arbitrator decides the dispute between the parties. The appeal is disposed of. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI),J . item no.44 baweja/-