THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.24953 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the owner of the plot No.9 of Sy.No.57 of Karmanghat Revenue Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, admeasuring 277 sq.yards. Respondents 3 to 6 own Plot.No.8 in the immediate neighbourhood of the petitioner. The petitioner submitted representations in August and September, 2010, alleging that respondents 3 to 6 are making illegal construction in Plot No.8, without any permission, and by encroaching partly into plot No.9. This writ petition is filed alleging that the respondents 1 and 2 did not take any steps on the representations made by the petitioner. The petitioner contends that the respondents 3 to 6 are acting in a highhanded manner, not only making unauthorized construction, but also encroaching his land; and that respondents 1 and 2 have failed in their duty to prevent such acts. On behalf of the respondents 3 to 6, a counter-affidavit is filed. They submit that the petitioner filed O.S.No.2361 of 2009 for the relief of injunction, and O.S.No.1268 of 2010, for recovery of possession, in the competent Court of jurisdiction against them, and that, even while the said suits are pending, the present writ petition is filed, almost for the same relief. It is further stated that the Municipal Corporation has accorded permission to them for making construction. They state that the construction was made, strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2, and learned counsel for the respondents 3 to 6. The petitioner, on the one hand, and respondents 3 to 6, on the other hand, own plot Nos.8 and 9, respectively, in Sy.No.57 of Karmanghat village. The petitioner is under the impression that respondents 3 to 6 are making construction, without obtaining permission from the Municipal Corporation. A copy of the order dated 20-08-2010, according sanction for construction by the respondents 3 to 6, on the said plots, is placed before this Court. It appears that the petitioner was not aware of the said order. As regards the allegation that the respondents 3 to 6 have encroached into the plot of the petitioner, he has already filed suits before the competent Civil Court. The question, as to whether the respondents 3 to 6 have encroached into any land of the petitioner; can be effectively decided by the Civil Court. It is needless to mention that the construction, if any, made by the respondents 3 to 6, would be subject to the outcome of the suits, or any interlocutory orders, that may be passed in them. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the pending suits. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.04-02-2011. KO