CD SINGLE BENEH PETITIONERS IN THE H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP (S) N0QW201Q‘” Prafull Deshmukh aged about 4‘3 ygeax’z: s/o Shri Dev Rao Deshmukh rm \Im ac Adbhar TahsH Maikhamda Distvim Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh Sheikh Razzab aged about 4O yéaam Sm Sheikh Ramzan r/o Viilage Adbhar TahsM Maikhamda Dis‘mct Janigi? Champa Chhattisgarh GanESh Prasad aged abcut 4G ym, m; Amar Singh Yadav r/o Viia!ge Chm/wig; Tahsil Maikharoda Digtricfi Jas’xjgk’ Champa Chhattisgarh Uma Gabhel aged about 46 yeass; Wm Rohit Jumar Gabhei r/o Vinagie Phaguram Tahsii Maikhamda ¥L)ie‘s&ri~;:%. Janjgir Champa Chhattisgam Ram Kumar Bharti aged about 44 y‘amm 5/0 Sundei” Ram r/o Viiiage (.Ehai‘apam Tahsu Malkharoda District Jawigsr Champa Chhattisgarh . "' Dhanesher Bharti aged about 44 yeam s/o Pandit Ram Bharti r/o Vilmga Charapara Tahsil Ma5khar0da Diamc‘t Janjgir Champa Chhattiagarh 7. Shatrughan Singh Swar aged abwi Ail: years a/o Dadu Singh rm ‘1’”;:;.é"z:;>ii 39p \f‘ hum-n @ Ma‘khamda District Jamjgir ’mamm Chhattisgarh Kun} Bai aged about 4O y‘eam wio Ram Vilas Burman r/o ViHage Bade Wadermudh Tahsi! Malkharoda Dis-mm. Janjgir Champa Chhatijsgarh Shankar La! Kurre aged about M v s/o Mohan La! Kurr’e ~r/0 Vmage Ba w RESPONDENTS The Secretary, SChOOi Educa'tmm DK$ Bhawan Raipur Chhaitksgarh Sub Division! Officer (Revenue) ‘iz'ki/M District Janjgir—Champa Chhatiiwarh 3i Deputy DirectOr Educatiom Disgtrim Janjgir-Champa Chhaftisgari‘i 4i Block Education Officer Disti’ici Janjgii \K’; Champa Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI'iUTiC‘N Oi“: Seepat Tahsil Malkharoda DIS‘iriCa Janjgir Champa Chhattiggmh VERSUS 1. /, The Siate of Chhamsgarh — Thmugh- HIGI-I COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 634 of2011 PETH‘IONER : Prafull Deshmukh & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgaxh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘SB: Hon’ble Shl'i Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: " Shri A.V.Shridhar. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL K (Passed on 03r day of February, 2011) ' I. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Court to Withdraw this petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ’ Amit