1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9054 OF 2007 Nitin Shamrao Patil .. Petitioner Versus Mrs.Poonam Nitin Patil .. Respondent Mr.N.V.Vechalekar i/b. N.V.Vechalekar & Co. for petitioner Mr.R.M.Purandare for respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1743 OF 2008 Mrs.Poonam Nitin Patil .. Petitioner Versus Nitin Shamrao Patil .. Respondent Mr.R.M.Purandare for respondent Mr.N.V.Vechalekar i/b.N.V.Vechalekar & Co. for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th March 2008 P.C. . Heard learned Counsel for parties. Perused the petition and annexures, including 2 impugned order. 2. Mr.Vechalekar after taking instructions from petitioner who is present in court states that petitioner would deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month from April 2007 till date within a period of four weeks from today in the trial court. If such deposit is made, trial court to allow the petitioner to apply for modification of its interim order and such application shall be considered after hearing both sides and without being influenced by the earlier orders and observations. 3. If compliance is not made W.P.9054 of 2007 shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court. If compliance is made, respondent wife is allowed to withdraw the amount deposited in trial court, without prejudice to her rights and contentions and that also of the husband. In addition respondent wife shall also be entitled 3 to apply for enhancement of the same and such application shall also be considered by the trial court along with the application, if any of the husband. If the husband does not comply with his own statement, even then, wife is at liberty to apply for enhancement and that application shall also be dealt with on merits and in accordance with law. Petition disposed of. No costs. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)