HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARYANA WRIT PETITION NO.17920 OF 2006 Dated: 28.8.2006 Between: G. Sadanand, S/o. late Shivaiah, aged about 57 years, R/o. H. No. 6-3-902/A, Somajiguda, Hyderabad and others. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P. represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. …. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARYANA WRIT PETITION NO. 17920 OF 2006 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel on record. The writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider all the aspects in the revision petition and dispose of the statutory revision dated 26.8.2006 under Section 679 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 by giving opportunity to the petitioners and consequently declare the action of the 1st respondent in not passing any interim orders suspending the operation of the impugned notice No. 0474/CSC/TP5/2003-05, dt. 23.8.2006 on the file of the 4th respondent as bad in law and violative of principles of natural justice and pass such other order or orders. The counsel on record made elaborate submissions pointing to the relevant portions of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and several of the material papers which had been relied upon. However, the learned Standing Counsel representing the 2nd respondent-Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad would submit that merely because a revision is filed automatically the petitioners are not entitled to any interim order. The learned counsel also pointed out several of the factual controversies and also the historical background of the litigation. Learned Government Pleader on behalf of the 1st respondent requested time to dispose of the revision pending on the file of the 1st respondent. In view of the facts and circumstances, taking into consideration several details which had been furnished, the 1st respondent is hereby directed to dispose of the revision within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the order and till then the respondents shall maintain status-quo existing as on today. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. _________________ DATE: 28th August, 2006 P.S. NARAYANA,J Note: Communicate the operative portion by Wire at party’s costs. B/o pnb