1 wp224.03 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 224 OF 2003 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Milind Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent/State. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & SHRI M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 27th June, 2011. . The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 24.04.2000 passed by the Tahsildar in revenue proceedings. As a consequence, the petitioners have sought a direction against respondent nos. 4 to 6 to conduct an enquiry against the Tahsildar, and to seek an explanation from him about the manner in which he has conducted the proceedings in file No. 99/Jama/Kavi-333 from Tahsil Office, Chakur, Dist. Latur. 2. Admittedly, the petitioners have preferred an appeal against this order before the appropriate authority. In these circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the present Petition. If the appropriate authority finds that the Tahsildar has not conducted the aforesaid 2 wp224.03 proceedings legally or in a fair and proper manner, the Appellate Authority will correct the injustice caused to the petitioners. 3. Petition dismissed. Appeal preferred by the petitioners shall be decided as expeditiously as possible, if it is still pending. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/wp224.03