:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.SABHAHIT AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO CCC NO,2144/2O1OtWtJ] // coted iidf BETWEEN: SRIVALINGAPPA, S/0 SHANKARAPPA TANDUR AGE 87 YEARS, 0CC: AGRIL., R/O MELINAPETE HAVERI 581 110 COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. A.A. PATI’AN, R. S.ANKALKOTI AND AMIRKHAN A. PATHAN. ADVS ABSENT.) AND: H.K.RUDRAPPA, COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HAVERI. . . ACCUSED/RESPONDENT THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE HIGH COURT ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO INITIATE A APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS INCLUDING THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS PROCEEDINGS AGAISNT THE ACCUSED FOR THE WILL FUL DISOBEDIENCE AND NON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER DATED 11/03/2010 PASSED IN W.P. NO.65921/2009(LB-UC) VIDE ANNEXURE C2 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED AND THEREBY CAUSED THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS :2: HONBLE COURT AND UPHOLD THE DEGNITY AND MAGESTY OF LAW AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, V.G.SABHAHIT.J. MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Counsel appearing for the complainant absent. We have perused the office objections. Since the earlier CCC 2072/2010 was dismissed on merits without any observation or liberty to file a fresh contempt petition, this petition is not maintainable. Office objection upheld. Contempt petition is dismissed as not maintainable. sal 3UDG Sd/ JUDGE krnv