IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.32321 OF 2011 RAMJEE SINGH, S/O KAILASH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE SONADIH, P.S KARGAHAR, DISTRICT ROHTASH. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02/ 24.10.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. True it is that the petitioner is named accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 I.P.C as well as 25(1-B), A/26/27 Arms Act but there being no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner and co accused Dadan Singh has been allowed anticipatory bail by an order dated 25.05.2011 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous no. 16394 of 2011, who too alike the petitioner was said to have caught hold of the deceased, this Court would direct the petitioner namely Ramjee Singh to surrender within a period of four weeks from today and if he does so, he would be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection 2 with Kargahar P.S Case No. 207 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner, in case, is now made accused in any other criminal case,that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)