IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11315 of 2009 Between: 1 Shad Uddin Basheer S/o.Basheer Jung Bahadur H.No.8-1-332/3/18 Aziz Bagh,Tolichowki,Hyderabad 2 Rasheed Unnisa Begum W/o. Qutub Yar Jung H.No.8-1-332/3/18 Aziz Bagh,Tolichowki,Hyderabad 3 Mohd Noor Uddin Khan S/o Late Md Fareeduddin Khan Flat No.309 Jahender Apts Mehidpatnam,Hyderabad 4 Iqbal UnnisaBegum D/o. Tahverunnisa Begum Flat No.309 Jahender Apts Mehidpatnam,Hyderabad 5 Yousufunnisa Begum W/oLate Zainul Abedin Khan H.No.20-3-1118/13 Shahgunj,Hyderabad 6 Sultan Ali Bin Ahmed Quitee S/o Sultan Ahmed Bin Mohammed AI Quitee H.No.20-7-214 Quzipura Shah Ali Banda,Hyderabad 7 Sultan Award Bin Ahmed AI Quitee S/o Sultan Ahmed Bin Mohammed AI Quitee .No.20-7-214 Quzipura Shah Ali Banda,Hyderabad 8 Sultan Omer Bin Ahmed AI Quitee S/o Sultan Ahmed Bin Mohammed AI Quitee H.No.20-7-214 Quzipura Shah Ali Banda,Hyderabad 9 Mir Naseer Uddin Khan S/o Zahoor Uddin Khan H.No.17-1-375/27/C New Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad 10 Mir Fareed Uddin Khan S/o Zahoor Uddin Khan H.No.17-1-375/27/C New Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad 11 Viquar Unnisa Begum W/o. Naseer Uddin Khan H.No.17-1-375/27/C New Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad 12 Fareed Unnisa Begum W/o. Sayed Baqtiyar Ali Khan H.No.17-1-375/27/ A/29 Khalander Nagar,Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad 13 Waheed Unnisa Begum W/o. Sayed Firasath Ali Khan H.No.17-1-375/27/ A/13 Khalander Nagar,Santosh Nagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Greater Hyderbad Municipal Corporation rep.by its Commissioner &Special Officer Having office at Tankbund Road,Hyderabad 2 The Chief City Planner Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Having Office at Tankbund Road Hyderabad 3 The Sation House Officer P.S Alwal, having Office at Alwal R.R District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not issuing the permission for construction of boundary wall surrounding the land of the petitioners under Sy No.1 of Hashmathpet(V) total admeasuring Ac 4.06 guntas of Balanagar(M) Ranga Reddy District is highly illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and also violation of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Act 1955 and consequently direct the respondents 1&2 to consider the application of the petitioner dt 29-12- 2008 and 25-5-2009 for issuance of construction permission of boundary wall surrounding the land of the petitioners under Sy No.1 of Hashmathpet(V) total admeasuring Ac 4.06 guntas of Balanagar (M) Ranga Reddy District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.11315 of 2009 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that the respondents herein failed to consider the application of the petitioners dated 29.12.2008 and 25.2.2009 for grant of permission for construction of boundary wall surrounding the land of the petitioners under Survey No.1 of Hashmathpet Village. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. The material placed before this Court shows that the application made by the petitioners dated 25.5.2009 was received in the office of the respondents 1 and 2 on the same date. In the circumstances, the respondents 1 and 2 are bound to consider the petitioners’ representations in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the applications of the petitioners dated 25.5.2009 and 25.2.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. _______________ Justice G.Rohini Date:10.06.2009 mrb