1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2848 OF 2009 Mohd.Gaus Ibrahim Shaikh .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Ms.Sarojini Upadhya for the petitioner. Mrs.A.S.Pai A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2010. P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. In this petition, through jail, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 7.1.2010 passed by the District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik. By this order the learned District Judge has confirmed the punishment proposed by the Superintendent, Cental Jail, Nashik Road. The Superintendent in pursuance of the order passed by this court in earlier writ petition, filed by the petitioner bearing writ petition no.1241 of 2009 on 12.8.2009, considered the petitioner’s case afresh in accordance with the guidelines and recommended exclusion of remission for next five years and that the petitioner would not be entitled for leave under Parole Furlough Rules, for next five years, as against earlier proposal of deduction of 342 days for 171 days overstay by the petitioner. We have perused S 2 the guidelines and we are satisfied that the order passed by the Learned District Judge is in accordance with new guidelines. We find no ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned District Judge dated 7.1.2010. Hence the petition is dismissed. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)