IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37675 of 2009 1.SANTOSH KUMAR son of late Arjun Sao resident of village Sabzi Mandi,P.S. Jehanabad, Dist. Jehanabad. 2.Satyanand Singh son of Sri Om Singh, resident of village Arwal More, P.S. jehanabad, Dist. Jehanabad. …..Petitoners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Rahman/ Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the informant. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in complaint case no. 290 of 2009 instituted under sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that there is dispute between the petitioner no.1 and complainant with respect to payment of money regarding truck which is said to have been purchased by the petitioner no.1. Complainant was allegedly running the business and later the petitioner no.1 has taken over the business. There is dispute between the parties for payment and each one claims certain amount against other. A complaint petition has also been filed by the petitioner no.1 against the complainant which is complaint case no. 906 of 2009. As far as petitioner no.2 is concerned he is bonafide purchaser from petitioner no.1. Considering that the dispute arises out of the financial transaction, I direct that the above named petitioners in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today in the above noted case be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Ist class, Jehanabad , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Sheema Ali Khan, J) - 2 - M.Rahman