KBP 2145-92.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2145 OF 1992 Jumma Khan Zarin Khan ..Petitioner Vs. Shaikh Mohmood Mohd. Sab alias Bhimiya and ors. ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2349 OF 1996 Ahmed Sahab Usman Saheb Khairadi ..Petitioner Vs. Shaikh Mohamed Saheb Bhaimiya since deceased, his legal heirs. A.Smt.Aminabi Sk.Mehmood and ors. ..Respondents ......... Mr.Ajay Patil i/b.Mrs.Suhasini Mutalik, for petitioners in both petitions. Ms.Gadre i/b.Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande, for respondent Nos.3 to 8 in Writ Petition No.2145 of 1992. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 10 th August, 2009. P.C. : 1] Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has placed on record a xerox copy of the compromise arrived at between the parties. He states that in view of the compromise between the parties nothing survives in these petitions and the parties will be bound by the terms and conditions incorporated in the compromise. Xerox copy of the compromise is taken on record in both the petitions and the same is marked as “X” for identification. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 8 in writ petition no.2145 of KBP 2145-92.sxw 2 1999 states that she has no instructions about the settlement. 2] The statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners on the basis of xerox copies of the compromise tendered on record, is accepted. Writ petitions are dispose of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 3] In the event the respondents desire to dispute the statement of the petitioner recorded above, they are free to take out an appropriate application. ( A.S.OKA, J. )