Civil Revision No. 6673 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6673 of 2008 Date of Decision: 3.12.2008 Harpal Kaur …Petitioner Versus Smt. Rajwant Kaur and Others ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Tenancy rights vested in one Natha Singh. Gurcharan Singh son of Natha Singh, as per the landlord, succeeded to the tenancy rights. Landlord has set up a case that Gurcharan Singh had rented out the premises to Hans Raj and thereby made himself liable on the ground of sub-tenancy. During the pendency of proceedings, Harpal Kaur wife of Gurcharan Singh made a claim on the basis of will of her father-in-law Natha Singh that she is the tenant. Application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC was allowed and she was allowed to be impleaded as respondent No.3. Learned Rent Controller held that if the evidence is adduced by the parties, it shall be determined as to who was the tenant whether Gurcharan Singh was a tenant or Harpal Kaur on basis of basis of will has become tenant? Civil Revision No. 6673 of 2008 2 Relationship of landlord and tenant is to be determined. Thus, adequate opportunity in view of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Apex Court in Rakesh Wadhawan v. M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation 2002 (1) Rent Control Reporter 514 shall automatically flow to the petitioner in depositing the rent in case she is held to be tenant. Therefore, her application for assessment of provisional rent and offer to deposit the same has been rightly declined. With these observations, the present revision petition is disposed off. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge December 3, 2008 “DK”