IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21402 of 2009 SHANKAR TURIYA Versus STATE OF BHIAR ----------- 3 07.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 392 and 411 of the I.P.C. As per prosecution case, when the informant was going to school on motorcycle, three unknown accused persons intercepted him and under fear of pistol injury the motorcycle was snatched. It appears from the impugned order that in course of investigation witnesses are supported with the case. It also appears that the stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that his signature was obtained on a blank paper which was later converted into seizure memo. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since 12.11.2008. Having regard to the allegation and the materials collected in support thereof including the seizure memo, this Court is not persuaded to admit him on bail. This 2 application is rejected. However, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after eight months, if in the meanwhile, the trial of the case is not taken up in Court below. Bibhash (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)