IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38209 of 2008 SURAJ KUMAR YADAV @ SURAJ RAI, S/o Basudeo Rai, Resident of village – Ashwari Banjaria, P.S. – Kathaiya, District – Muzaffarpur. …. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opp. Party. ----------- 04/ 16.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 302/379/34 of the Penal Code, which was lodged against six unknown. Petitioner, one Harendra Rai and others were implicated the following day of the occurrence by the mother of the deceased, who claimed knowledge about the complicity of the petitioner and Harendra Rai from the deceased himself. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that deceased had died before lodging of the fard-beyan in the hospital and thereafter the fard-beyan was lodged and the mother and the informant were available at the time of death and after the death of the deceased mother could not have learnt about the complicity of the petitioner and Harendra Rai from the deceased. Such submission was also available to Harendra Rai. His prayer for regular bail was also rejected once by this Court. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this application for grant of bail in the event of arrest, which is dismissed with direction to the petitioner to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and apply for regular bail - 2 - which should be considered in accordance with law. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)