IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 128 OF 2011 CHANDRU KRISHNA RAUT (SINCE DEC.) THROUGH LR'S, 1A. SHRI RAMA CHANDRU RAUT AND ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI. VAMAN GOPAL RAUT (SINCE DEC.) THROUGH LR'S, 1A. GOPAL VAMAN RAUT., ... Respondent Mr. A. D. Bhobe, advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 29th April, 2011 P.C: Heard Mr. Bhobe, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this petition, the petitioners challenge order dated 28/7/2010 passed in Special Civil Suit No.12/2008/A by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim dismissing the application for amendment filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, I find that the ground on which the trial Court has rejected the application cannot be said to be illegal or without jurisdiction to warrant interference in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the petition stands dismissed. 4. Needless to mention that the dismissal of the amendment application would not preclude the petitioners from availing any other remedy as may be available on law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-