IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10157 of 2000 Between: Yendamuri Surya Rao S/o.Late Markandeyulu M.C.H.Vizianagaram Vizianagaram District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Medical Superintendent Medical District Hospital Vizianagaram-521 001. 2 The Regional Director of Medical and Health Services Visakhapatnam-321 001. 3 District Coordinator of Hospital Services Vizianagaram-321 001. 4 Director of Health A.P., Hyderabad-001. 5 The Secretary Medical and Health(Ser) Dept Govt of A.P, Secretariat Building Hyderabad-22. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to may be pleased to issue an appropriate order , Writ , or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed by the Hon'ble A.P.A.T in OA.No.1342/2000 Dt: 28-03-2000 disposing of the OA as illegal and null and void and set- aside the same and further declare that the suspension of the petitioner from the post of Pharmacist Grade-I at District Hospital , MCH., Vizianagaram as illegal null and void and opposed to Rules governing suspension and also violative of Articles 14 , 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for consequential direction to reinstate the petitioner in the said post forthwith and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.MANIK PRABHU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : VE & PSR, JJ W.P.No. 10157 of 2000 O r d e r: (Per P. Swaroop Reddy, J.) This petition is filed by the applicant in O.A.No. 1342 of 2000 questioning his suspension. While disposing of the said O.A., by its order dated:28.3.2000, the learned Tribunal directed the applicant to file an appeal before the statutory authority. 2. Now the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-applicant reports that pursuant to the directions learned Tribunal, the petitioner filed the appeal, which was considered and dismissed by the statutory authority, as he also simultaneously filed this writ petition. 3. In view of the filing of the appeal by the petitioner-applicant in pursuance of the observations of the learned Tribunal in O.A.No. 1342 of 2000 and in view of the fact that the petitioner-applicant has already retired from service, nothing remains in this writ petition for adjudication as the cause has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J. Dated:21.07.2009 *BVS _____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J