IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 5012 OF 2011 (Rashtriya Sakhar Kamgar Union VS. The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. G.J. Pahilwan, Advocate h/f. Mr. R.V. Gore, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 29.07.2011 P.C.:- 1. The petitioner claims to be a registered and representative Union for the Taluka Erandol for the sugar industry under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act. According to the petitioner, an agreement has been entered into between respondent no.3 and respondent no.4. Respondent no.4, according to the petitioner, is not a registered Union and, therefore, could not have entered into such a settlement. Hence, the present Petition. 2. In our opinion, the Petition is not maintainable. The petitioner has adequate efficacious and alternate remedies available to it under the Labour laws. Petition rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]