IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR EV 1L WRIT PETITION (S) No /2010 $3 J’Ku. Bharti Verma D/o Shri Kaushal Kumar Verma aged about 2O years r/o PETITIONER .fjkgwy (v Q W 1 Vldya‘ . Nagar,Near Durga Mandlr . Pendra Wese$ ffvq [OJ Dist Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ..... I : Versus State of Chhattisgarh —Through- The_ Secretary Department of Panchayat and Ruraldevelopment D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur Chhattisgarh Examination Board -Through Controtler Premises of Board of Secondary Education Pensionbada , Raipur C.G. Chief Executive Officer Janapad Panchayat (I 2. Chhattisgarh Professional “ Gaurelia Dist . Bilaspur C.G. ,/ 4. Chief Executive Officer Janapad Panchayat Barkela (Sariyalendra) Dist Raigarh C.G. “I. 5 Mamta Kumari Kashyap w/o Shri Pawan Kumar Kashyap resident of Village Kudakai Tahasil Pendra Dist Bilaspur C.G. Tanu Prlya Tamrakar D/o‘Rakesh Tamrakar Rirana Marchant M.B.Road Post Pendra road Distt— Bilaspur C.G.. ' @ TUTJON OF T PET!TION UNDEB ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$Ti 7,/ lNDlA f WRI PETIHONER MW HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SE N0. 5322 0f2010 Ku. Bham' Venna. VERSUS State ofChhattisgérh & Others. RESPONDENTS WRIT FETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Sin'i Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri H.B.Agrawal with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. ORDER ORAL (Paseeci on 18 day of January, 201 1) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner, The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismisseti for want of prosecution. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotr Judge Amit i