iTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1722 OF 2011 ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 04-03-2011 in I.A.No.402 of 2010 in A.S.No.113 of 2007 on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Judge, Fast Track Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. The petitioners herein filed the above application under Order XI Rule 14, 141 and 151 CPC for production of documents such as daily account books, ledger accounts along with income tax returns of Bright Udyog and respondents individual income tax records and documents pertaining to the alleged personal business transaction of the respondents and their firms with the petitioners during the period from 1990 to 2000. The said application was dismissed on the ground that the petitioners have failed to take steps to summon the documents in the custody of the respondents. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners contended that the trial Court while disposing of I.A. No.174 of 2009 clearly emphasized that the amendment sought for by the petitioners is in the nature of production of documents, and therefore, the trial Court ought to have allowed the application. 4. Receipt of documents at the appellate stage is not a matter of course or in routine manner. The petitioners must satisfy that their case falls under any one of the three clauses as mentioned under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC. It is not the case where the trial Court refused to receive the documents. So also it is not the case of the petitioners that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within his knowledge or could not, after the exercise of due diligence, be produced by him at the time when the decree appealed against was passed. Similarly, it is not the case of the petitioners herein that there is substantial cause for production of documents. Furthermore, the plaintiffs have not taken any pleadings in the plaint with regard to these documents. Therefore, in the absence of any substantial reason for filing of application at a belated, the same cannot be allowed. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ---------------------- K.C.BHANU, J. DATED: 29-08-2011 Hsd