^ OF : WRjT PETITION (C) N0,4058 QF 2WQ 2. 3. 4 5. 6. 8 9 10 Raj^sh Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Ram Rasai AgrawaS, aged about 47-years, Cuitivator by profession, R/o House Near Naighar Chowk, Ahmadbjee Colony, Ralpur City, Tahsii and District Raipur (CG). Versus State of Chhatti^garh, Through Secretary, Department of Reversue, DX.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ralpur (CG). The Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhavvan, ?(4antra!aya, Raipur (CG). Director General of Poli'ce, Chhattlsgarh, Pojjce Headquarters, Raipur (CG). The Commissloner, Raipur Divisjon, Raipur, Dlsfrict Raipur (CG). Adcljtlon^i Commissioner,. Raipi.ir Divjslon, Ralpur, District Ralpur (CG). Ram RasalAgravi/al, 87 years, S/o Late Ghri Kanta Prasad Agrawal. MangaJ Vinod Agrawal, aged about 50 years, S/o Shri Ram Rasal Agrawai. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late yadhusudaii Agrawai. Ramjee Lal Agrawal, S/o Late Madhusudhan Agrawa!. Smt. Yashoda Baj Agrawal, W/o Shri Satya Narayan Agrawa!. Respondents No,4 to 10 ar@ R/o Bania Para, Puranj Basti, Raipur (CG). 11. Ashlt Kumar Agrawal, • 'S/o Shri Ram Rasal, R/o ASiiTiadjee Coiony, Raipur (CG). 1? Sakha Ram Paiil, S/o Purushottam Pau(, R/o v-iliage Kurra, Tahsii Nawapara, Distt. Ralpur (CG). 13. Radhe Shyam, S/o Bhuwanlal Sharma, R/o Brahmin Para, Raipur (CG). QA/rit petition under Artide 226 ofthe Constitution of Incila) Slngte Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnjhotrj, J. : Shri Saurabh Dangi, counsei for the Shri A?ol< Bakshl, Go\4. Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 5. -z </ ORAL (Passed on this 28th day of July, 2008) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petitjon is heard finally. 7) Learned counsel appeanng for the petitloner submits that the petStloner does not want to press'thls on merits, at this However. the petitloner may be permitted to make a representation before the concemed authoritles and the be to he considered and decided, in accQrdance with law, withjn the prescribed tlme. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that If the representation is rnade, the same shali be considered and by the concerned authorlty, ln accordance with law, on its own merits, within a perlod of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) In view of the foregolng, the diaposed of. No orde.r astocosts. 5) Consequentiy, application (I.A.No.1/2008) for taklng typed copy of order on record stands disposecl of. _—— Gowrl Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^^