IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 19402 of 2008 Between: AKHILESH AGARWAL S/o. Mahesh Chander R/o. MCH.No. 21-6-421, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2 The Dy. Commissioner of Police, Police Station, Charminar, Hyderabad. 3 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Station, Charminar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents removing the Ganapathi Moria Installation from the side of the House MCH.No. 21-6- 421, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad, is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art.26 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to remove the Ganapathi Moria Installation from the side of the House MCH.No. 21-6-41, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad as permission accorded vide CPDCL Rect No. 4511, Dt. 25.08.2008. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.T.GHORI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19402 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents in removing the Ganapathi Moria Installation from the side of the House MCH.No. 21-6-421, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad, is illegal and arbitrary. Learned Government Pleader for Home under instructions stated that though the petitioner made an application on 25-08-2008, no permission has been granted by the respondents for installation of the idol since the petitioner intended to install the idol in the middle of the road. In these circumstances, the action of the respondents cannot be held to be either arbitrary or illegal. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 09-09-2008 KLP