IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3031 of 2007 MASOMAT RAMVATI DEVI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE GANESH RAVIDAS,S/O PYARE RAVIDAS, R/O VILL-GOHRI, P.O. PACHAM, P.S.& DIST. LAKHISARAI, AT PRESENT R/O VILL. RAMTALIGANJ P.S. KAJRA (SURAJGARHA) DIST. LAKHISARAI. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. L.KUNGA, DIRECTOR, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. MR. GAUTAM GUHA, ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. NAND KISHORE KESHRI S/O LATE BHAGWAN DAS KESHRI, DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, LAKHISARAI. 5. NEELKAMAL S/O SRI RAMANUGRAHA, DIST. PROVIDENT OFFICER, MUNGER 6. SRI NARSING UPADHYA, TREASURY OFFICER, LAKHISARAI. --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 26.08.2009 The present application has been filed seeking initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for having wilfully and deliberately violated the order of this court passed on the writ application of the petitioner bearing C.W.J.C.No. 11641/05 (Annexure-1). Aforesaid writ application was disposed of in the following manner: After having heard counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the substantial grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the authorities including the grievance with regard to the grant of second time bound promotion as respondent has already submitted with reference to instructions received by him that the same has already been granted to the petitioner and the revision shall be made accordingly. With regard to other left out grievance, if any, the petitioner is at liberty to move appropriate authority by filing appropriate representation within a period of 3 weeks from today. If the same is filed with all the records in support thereof, the concerned authority shall consider and disposed of the same in accordance with law within further period of two months therefrom and if any amount found due to the petitioner, the same shall be released in her favour within one months thereafter. With this observation/direction, the application stands disposed of. 2 Several sets of show-causes have been filed. Learned Standing counsel no.22 appearing on behalf of the opposite parties draws attention of the court to the supplementary show-cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.5 ( District Provident Officer, Munger). In paragraph no.3 and 4 of the said supplementary show-cause the following averments have been made: 3. That is further stated that District-Welfare Officer, Lakhisarai vide his letter No. 11, dated 09.01.2008 has stated that from 1965-66 to 1983-84 ( till Dec. 1983), there is no deduction on the basis of statement made by the Block Development Officer, Suryagarha vide Letter No. 32, dated 07.01.2008. 4. That the A.G.Bihar has written vide Letter No. 746, dated 09.01.2008 that till 1981-1982, there is no credit and debit because the petitioner’s husband account was allotted on 21.10.83. Looking to the nature of the direction issued by this court as also the explanations submitted by the opposite parties, this court is satisfied that no case for wilful violation of the order passed by this court has been made out warranting initiation of contempt proceeding. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)