IN THEiIIGH CQURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR (C.G.) C?)^_ , . J~ WRIT PETITION-^IO. ^"2 ^~i? OF200$^_ PETITIONERS 1. Itwara Bai Wd/o Late Shri Cham.ru Ram Satnami, aged about 60 years. 2. Hira Lal Nourange S/o Late Chamru Rani Satnarai, aged about 31 years. Both resident of Kailash Nagar Balco, District Korba (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS :- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Additional Secretary, Water Resource Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^ 2. Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojana, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. Executive Engineer (Administration) Water Resource Departinent, Hasdeo Bango Pariyojana, Division Korba, District Korba. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As stated above. 2] PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS:- As stated above. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE -^^^ "s^ -i<wwi(, w-aiwie, ^wwy. ..^.J^:lw:l^.^.^, SB : Hoji'bte Shn Manindra Mohan Sh Shri Sanjay Patel, counsei for the betitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocat^ for the State/respondents. Heard. This petition was filed by the (jleceased petitioner-Chamru Ram questioning the action of respondentsi 31-01-1998. The deceased petitioner continuanoe in service till 31-05-2003 bU regard to his date of birth, he has be^n retired even before he aotually attajned the age of superannuation. Du original petitioner died on 31-12-2004 wfiereupon his legal representatives were allowed to prosecute this petitijsn by allowing their application (I.A.No.2106/2006) for impleadment as| counse! for the petitioner-legal represen) Chamru Ram submitted that in so far t servioe till 31-05-2003 is concerned, However, it was stated that the retiral d( Chamru Ram was entitled, have not b^en finally settled. This Couri: had granted three weeks time to the responc) ^iiNwit'-i iWRff 'if lyat i.fq<$i< ivastaya,J. jn retiring him with effect from taimed that he was entitled for on account of incorrect entry with ing the pendency of this petition, parties. On 19-02-2010, learned tatives of the deceased petitioner- as claim regarding continuance in |he same is not being pressed. jes, to whioh deceased petitioner- >nts to verify and inform the Court about the present status of the case ()f the petitioner and to submit an affidavit whether the retiral dues of the have been finally settled or not. In compliance of the order pass been filed by the respondents stating th|t the retira! dues of the deceased petitioner-Chamru Ram have been settl^d, but no one has approached the respondent authority to claim the dues. deceased petitioner-Chamru Ram 'd by this Court, an affidavit has \t has also been stated that as per mwEl? ^iftil yniBC, ;.,,-.| in]R —FS'147—2/2010 —1,00,000. "n " ,? ^ "^"'XI-HC—78 ^^r';:TTInwT, t?Ti1y'i<c, fN^rray ...^l.^.^.^M^£ S(A?! -q?^ (1i?fg,^q) sn^i vi h'u* wn 3!K?[ sni!<» t- Turhane 'i^ service record of the deceased petition| did not nominate any of his family memt| In these circumstances, it woul| direct the petitioner to approach the re^ Hasdeo Barrage, R.B.C., Water Mar\ (CG). The respondent No.3 shall take ^ retiral dues ofthe deceased petitioner-Q W.P.IC.G. Civil Sewices Pension Rules, respondent No.3 within one month from be paid to the person entitled within a p' petitioners appear before respondent Nc In view of aforesaid direction, the ^)l11lf^(iiN 'RTR^f ^ I^St <F*l^i< ^Tsifiwan^i sr-Chamru Ram, it is found that he 'era or any one else as nominee. J be appropriate for this Court to .pondent No.3-Executive Engineer, agement Division, Rampur/Korba lecessary steps towards release of hamru Ram in accordance with the 1976.The petitioner shall approaoh today. The entire retiral dues shall priod of three months from the date 1.3. Ipetition stands disposed of. Sd/- Manmd-^shrivastava Judge '<?