THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY Writ Petition No. 16219 of 2011 DT. 3.8.2011 Between: Majilis Jamia Masjid Committee, Kadapa … Petitioner And Uppaluru Zahera Bi and others … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G Ramachandra Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 to 3, 6 and 7: Sri Bankatlal Mandhani The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY Writ Petition No. 16219 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Sri V Eswaraiah,J) This writ petition is filed seeking writ of certiorari and to call for the records in I.A. No. 175 of 2011 in Tr.A.S. No. 3139 of 1999 on the file of the Special Court, constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad and to set aside the same. This Court while issuing notices to respondents by order dated 17.6.2011, having regard to the fact that both counsel are ready for early disposal of the appeal pending before the Special Court, requested the Special Court to consider and dispose of the appeal expeditiously. On 17.6.2011 the learned counsel for respondents undertook that respondents would not execute the impugned order, pending disposal of the appeal before the Special Court. For the sake of convenience, the order dated 17.6.2011 is extracted below; Notice before admission. It is represented by counsel appearing on both sides that appeal in Tr.A.S No.3139 of 1999 on the file of the Special Court, constituted under A.P. Land Grabbing Prohibition Act at Hyderabad, (for short the Special Court) is listed for hearing today. The learned counsel for respondents undertakes that the respondents will not execute the impugned order, pending disposal of the appeal before the Special Court. Since both the counsel are ready and anxious for early disposal of the appeal pending before the Special Court, we request the Special Court to consider and dispose of the appeal expeditiously in accordance with law. Both the counsel represented that they will not seek for any adjournment and will cooperate for early disposal of the appeal by the Special Court. List after two weeks ‘for orders’, meanwhile counter to be filed by the respondents. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that the arguments before the Special Court by both the counsel were over and judgment may be delivered soon and that in view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for respondents on 17.6.2011 that respondents will not execute the impugned order, pending disposal of the appeal before the Special Court, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH,J __________________________ G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY,J DATE: 3.8.2011 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY Writ Petition No. 16219 of 2011 DT. 3.8.2011