IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15981 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANOOP,AGED 23 YEARS,S/O.RAVEENDRAN NAIR, 'AISWARYA',KUMARANALLOOR.PO,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC,COCHI U FOR R1, 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15981 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner was a student for B.Tech (Mechanical) course run by the 1st respondent University. The petitioner had appeared for the 8th semester examinations. But, when the result was published, he failed in one paper. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by him, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the results of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation sought for by the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the result of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to 8th Semester Examinations of B.Tech, as early as W.P.(C)No.15981 of 2009 :: 2 :: possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge