IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31566 of 2009 SATENDRA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.09.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the FIR is against unknown, his name has transpired on the confession of a co-accused which is inadmissible in evidence and he is in custody since 18.6.2007. As per allegation the alleged accused threw the bag containing cash on the spot after being chased. Learned Counsel for the State points out that the plea for bail of co-accused Ramdeo Yadav @ Ramdeo Singh who had been seen loitering near the place of occurrence has been rejected thrice by this Court. The third rejection order in Cr. Misc. No. 43825 of 2006 notices that the witnesses who allegedly identified him in their statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. failed to identify him in Court. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial No. 138 of 2008 arising out of Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 709 of 2002. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)