IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 15TH BHADRA 1932 FAO.No. 98 of 2009 -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06/04/2009 IN IA 2666/2009 IN OS.28/2005 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------- 1. ST.PETERS & ST.PAULS (JACOBITE) SYRIAN CHURCH, KURINJI MEEMPARA P.O., AYYAKARANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 2. K.V.KURIACHAN, KIZHAKKE CHERUKASTTU, MONAPPILLY, B.K.PURAM, (P.O.),PUTHENCRUZ. 3. FR.VARGHESE KALAPPURACKAL, KALAPURACKAL HOUSE, KADAYIRUPPU, KOLENCHERRY. 4. K.V.PAULOSE, S/O.VARGHESE, KEENELIL HOUSE, HOUSE, MEEMPARA, PUTHENCRUZ. BY ADV. MR.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN (MVA) MR.M.MANOJKUMAR (CHELAKKADAN) RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS: -------------------------------- 1. FR.C.K.JOHN COREPIOSCOPA, CHEERAKADAKUNNEL HOUSE, KIZHUMURI P.O., RAMAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM. 2. K.A.GEORGE, KALAPPATTIL HOUSE, B.K.PURAM, THIRUVANIYOOR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 3. K.V.KURIAKOSE, MEPPADATH HOUSE, THIRUVANIYOOR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. (CNTD....2) FAO.No. 98 of 2009 ::2:: 4. RAJAN K.VARGHESE, KALAPPATTIL HOUSE, THIRUVANIYOOR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 5. ROJI ABRAHAM, AKAMPALLIL HOUSE, THIRUVANIYOOR (P.O.). 6. DR.JACOB JOHN, AKAMPALLIL HOUSE, MEEMPARA, P.O.AIKYYAKARANADU SOUTH VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. 7. M.K.PAUL, MEEMPARA, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. K.V.THOMAS, SON OF VARGHESE, KADAMMANATTU HOUSE, MEEMPARA, PUTHENCRUZ. ADV. MR.T.K.VIPINDAS MR.P.J.PHILIP FOR R7,R8 MR.S.DILEEP FOR R1 MR.PAUL KURIAKOSE.K FOR R1 THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ F.A.O.No.98 Of 2009 ---------------------- Dated this the 6th day of September, 2010. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the 5th respondent submitted that the suit has been dismissed on 3.9.2010. The appellants challenged the interim order passed by the court below in I.A.No.2666/2009. Since the suit itself was disposed of by the trial court pending consideration of this FAO, the FAO has become infructuous. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-