IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.8355 of 2008. Decided on: 3.3.2011. Rattan Chand ……….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 & 2. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. K.B.Khajuria, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 3, 2011. (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No.