1 wp3725-10+2 agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3725 OF 2010 Premkumar Sunderlal Agarwal ..Petitioner. Versus High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.A.V. Anturkar for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Karnik for the respondent. WRIT PETITION NO.5359 OF 2010 Dhondiba s/o. Shankarrao Kore ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others ..Respondents. None for the petitioner. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.M.S. Karnik for respondent No.2 & 3. WRIT PETITION NO.5381 OF 2010 Sangeeta D/o Shrikisanji Rathi (Suda) ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another ..Respondents. None for the petitioner. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.M.S. Karnik for respondent No.2. CORAM : B.H. Marlapalle, & U.D. Salvi, JJ. DATE : 20th October 2010. 2 wp3725-10+2 P.C. : We have heard the parties and these petitioners were held to be ineligible on the grounds that i) recommendations were received after the due date; and ii) an extra photograph was not received along with the application. Mr.M.S. Karnik, the learned counsel appearing for the High Court Administration states on instructions that on both the counts the disqualification of these petitioners will be withdrawn and their cases will be considered as being eligible candidates so as to undergo further process of selection. Mr.Anturkar, therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw Writ Petition No.3725 of 2010. Leave granted. Writ Petition No.3725 of 2010 is disposed off as withdrawn. So far as Writ Petition Nos.5359 and 5381 of 2010 are concerned, in our opinion nothing further survives in these petitions once the High Court Administration has decided that the petitioners would be treated as eligible candidates to undergo further process of selection and hence the petitions are disposed off as infructuous. (U.D. Salvi, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.)