IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12672 of 2011 BIJAY YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner happens to be the cousin son-in-law of the informant and other accused persons are the agnates of the informant. The accusation against the petitioner is of pushing down the informant on the ground and tearing the clothes. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no accusation against the petitioner of committing theft and of making assault. Considering the aforesaid facts, let 2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bhairab Asthan P.S. Case No. 22 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Jhanjharpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)