1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s Orders. CP/78/2008 SYED LATEEFUDDIN V/S RANJEETSINGH DEOL With CA/3260/2009. 1. No one is present for the applicant. Smt. S.B.Wadmare, learned Assistant Government Pleader is present for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Smt. Sadaf Kazi h/f Shri J.R.Shaikh is present for respondent No.4. 2. Smt. Wadmare, learned AGP draws my attention to the observations of this Court in paragraph Nos.2 and 3 of the order passed in Writ Petition No.153 of 1995 dated 4.12.2003 so also paragraph Nos.16 to 19 of the reply affidavit dated 13.6.2008. She says that this Court has specifically observed that the said order would not come in the way of authorities while proceeding with the enquiry under the Hyderabad Atiyat Enquiries Act and therefore, prima facie, there is no contempt. 3. In view of the submissions made by Smt. Wadmare, learned AGP and also in view the non prosecution by the petitioner, the contempt petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. Civil Application No.3260 of 2009 stands dismissed for default, as none appears for the applicant. Dt.10.8.2009 (P.R.BORKAR,J.) akl