IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.621 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 9, 2009. Harnek Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Rashpal Singh Sarpanch & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: None for the petitioner. Shri J.S. Bandhohal, Advocate, for the respondents. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): CM Nos.21479-80-CII of 2009 Civil Misc. applications are allowed subject to just exceptions. COCP No.621 of 2009 Two separate replies have been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, which are taken on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the order passed by the Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab stands complied with and the contempt petition does not survive. In view of the aforesaid fact and the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. September 9, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge