THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No. 106 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against an order dated 8- 12-2009 passed in I.A. No. 477 of 2009 in R.C. No. 84 of 2006 by the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad. Revision petitioner herein is the respondent. Respondent herein is the petitioner before the court below. The respondent herein filed the above petition under Rule 7(5) of A.P. Rent Control Rules 1961 to receive the Xerox copy of the rental deed of March 1990 executed by the husband of the petitioner after condoning the delay. The petitioner herein resisted the said application by filing a counter. The court below, by way of the impugned order, dismissed the application but did not assign any reasons. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner therein preferred the present revision. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. A perusal of the order goes to show that the court below did not assign any valid reasons in dismissing the said petition except reproducing certain sections of the Indian Evidence Act. Under the above circumstances this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the matter be remanded to the court below to pass appropriate reasoned order after hearing both sides. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 8.12.2009 in IA No. 477 of 2009 in RC No. 84 of 2006 on the file of I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad is set aside and the matter is remanded to the court below with a direction to dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order after hearing both sides. ____________ 28-1-2010 kvrk THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No.106 of 2010 28-01-2010