IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:1188 of 2001 Between: 1 R.Madhusudan Reddy, S/o R.Cmuini Reddy, Chandragiri, Chittoor District. 2 V.Subramanyam Reddy S/o V.Gurav Reddy Chandragiri, Chittoor District. 3 N.Madhu S/o N.Yeera Reddy Chandragiri, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Endow-III)Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 2 Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Abids, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 3 The Executive Officer, Trimula Tirupathi Devastanam (TTD) , Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.M.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners herein pray that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 3rd respondent issued in his office reference Roc.No.TS3/38870/98, dt:3.1.2001 and the petitioners pray that the same may be quashed.” At the hearing, Sri M.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the averments contained in the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19th DECEMBER, 2008. kvni