IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.303 of 2011 KAMLA DEVI, WIFE OF BHAGIRATH PRASAD SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POLICE STATION- KASBA, DISTRICT-PURNEA. …………(PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT)……….APPELLANT. Versus 1. SHANKAR LAL CHAUDHARY, SON OF SRI PAWAN LAL CHAUDHARY. 2. MOSTT. SAGUNIA DEVI, WIDOW OF LATE SHYAM LAL CHAUDHARY. 3. ROHIT KUMAR CHAUDHARY. 4. GANESH PRASAD CHAUDHARY. SONS OF LATE SHYAM LAL CHAUDHARY. 5. SHRAWAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY, SON OF LATE SHYAMLAL CHAUDHARY. 6. SMT. KIRAN DEVI, WIFE OF JYOTISH PRASAD SAH. NOS.1 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE, POST OFFICE AND POLICE STATION-KASBA, DISTRICT- PURNEA. 7. SMT. MUNNI DEVI, WIFE OF SANTOSH PRASAD SAH. NO.7 IS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MADAR-GHAT, POST OFFICE AND POLICE STATION-KASBA. DISTRICT-PURNEA. 8. NARAIN SAH, SON OF LATE GANESH LAL SAH. 9. SHIVANAND SAH. 10. SHANKAR LAL SAH. 11. KARTIK PRASAD SAH. 12. AJAY PRASAD SAH. 13. VIJAY PRASAD SAH. SONS OF LATE HARI LAL SAH. NOS.8 TO 13 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE, P.O. AND POLICE STATION-KASBA, DISTRICT-PURNEA. (DEFENDANTS 2ND PARTY-RESPONDENTS 2ND PARTY). ……………………………………………...RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 19.5.2011. Heard the parties. 2 The office has raised objection to the maintainability of this Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge of this Court on 16th of November, 2010 in First Appeal No.551 of 1977 on the ground of bar created by Section 100-A of the Code of Civil Procedure. We find substance in the objection in the office notes. Since this appeal is barred by law, it is disposed of accordingly with a liberty that, if so advised, the appellant may prefer an appeal before the appropriate forum. P.S. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)