1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 57/2011 in W.P.No.3312/2010 Shri Ganesh Shikshan Sanstha, Bhandara and another vs. Shri Vasantrao Vitthalrao Gurjar ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. S.S.Ghate, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE & MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATE : 25.2.2011 Heard. We see no reason to interfere with the Judgment in appeal since the learned Single Judge has merely upheld the order of the Charity Commissioner under Section 41-A of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 directing certain information to be delivered to the respondent and to issue notice to the respondents if they are found to be members. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that such directions are beyond the scope of Section 41A which it is not possible to agree with since Section 41A expressly empower the Charity Commissioner to issue directions to ensure that the Trust is properly administered. The next contention is that such application can only be moved by the Member of the Trust. Section 41 A does not contain any such restriction. In fact, it 2` does not provide for who may move the Charity Commissioner but section confers power on the Charity Commissioner to issue directions. There is no merit in the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE patle