IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18771 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR DOM @ ASHOK DOM @ ASHOK RAM, S/o Late Ram Swarup Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 324, 307, 353, 457, 380 and 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B) A, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Considering the merits of the case the petitioner was directed to be released on bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 8663 of 2010 dated 23.03.2010 on the submission that only one other case is pending against the petitioner. However, when the Magistrate made verification about it it was found that the petitioner is accused in five other cases. The submission of the counsel is that the petitioner’s mother who swore affidavit being illiterate was unable to furnish the full details of the cases pending against the petitioner. In view of such and considering the merits of the case and also the fact that the petitioner’s mother is ready to take responsibility of the petitioner after his release from jail custody, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- 2 (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Patna in connection with S.Tr. No. 108 of 2010 arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 351 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)