IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31248 of 2009 DHONGHLA SINGH @ DHUNDHULA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 15.09.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks regular bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 307 as also under different Provisions of the Arms Act and Harijan Atrocities Act. Allegation is that when the informant and others, refused to command the dictum of the accused persons, who are working as labourer under co-accused, namely, Janardan Singh, they opened firings. Injury has been caused to none. It is contended that the present case is punctuated with malice and political reasons. It is next highlighted that some of the accused persons like co-accused, namely, Navin Singh and Janardan Singh have since been privileged with anticipatory bail by the court. Considering the fact that no one sustained injury in the occurrence as also the fact that he is in custody since 24.03.2009, this court is persuaded to admit him to bail. Let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case no. 357A/2005, G.R.No. 2 827 of 2005, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) No sooner the charges are farmed in the case, petitioner shall appear in person before the court below on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)