IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6841 of 2011 MOST.URMILA DEVI W/O LATE RAM BABU GUPTA @ CHHETA LAL GUPTA, D/O LATE RAJU SAO R/O PURAB DARWAJA, ZARDA STORE, P.S. MALSALAMI, DIST. PATNA (BIHAR) ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSIONER-CUM- SPECIAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, BELLI ROAD, PATNA, BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, PATNA 3. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, PATNA 4. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER-CUM-DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, PATNA CITY, DIST. PATNA 5. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, PATNA SADAR --- RESPONDENT 1ST 6. JAGDISH PRASAD SON OF LATE MEWA LAL YADAV 7. RAJESHWER PRASAD SON OF LATE MEWA LAL YADAV 8. JAI YADAV SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN YADAV 9. RAMJI PARASAD SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN YADAV 10. LAL BABU YADAV SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN YADAV 11. VIJAY YADAV SON OF LATE RAM LAKHAN YADAV 12. BINOD KUMAR SON OF LATE SHYAM NARAIN YADAV 13. PRAMOD KUMAR SON OF LATE SHYAM NARAIN YADV 14. VINAY KUMAR SON OF LATE RAJ KISHORE YADAV 15. MANOJ KUMAR SON OF LATE RAJ KISHORE YADAV 16. SANJAY KUMAR SON OF LATE RAJ KISHORE YADAV RESPONDENT NO. 6 TO 16 ARE THE RESIDENTS OF NAYA TOLA, KUMHRAR, P.S. AGAM KUWAN DIST. PATNA 17. SUNAINA DEVI W/O BALMUKUND UPADHYAY R/O VILL. AASTHA , P.S. CHANDI DIST NALANDA 18. BHUPENDRA SINGH SON OF RAMJEE SINGH R/O RAMLILA MATHIA, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DIST-CHAPRA (BIHAR) 19. DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGH SECRETARY, CHETNALAY SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SAMITI LTD. KANKARBAG, PATNA 20. JAGDISH MISHRA THE THEN CHETNALAY SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SAMITI LTD. KANKARBAG, PATNA 21. CHIRANJITA SINHA W/O SURYA KANT KUMAR NIRALA OF VILL. RUPALI, P.S. FATUHA, DIST. PATNA 22. DR. SURESH KUMAR SHARMA R/O VILL. BELA KATUA, DIST. SARAN ---- RESPONDENT 2ND SET. For the petitioner : Mr. Abhay Shankar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. R.B.Mahto, A.G. ----------- 02 19.04.2011 Heard. Matter arises out of a proceeding under the Bihar 2 Tenants Holding (Maintenance of Records) Act, 1973. By order dated 04.08.2008 (Annexure-3) the claim of mutation raised on behalf of the petitioner was rejected. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order petitioner filed appeal being Mutation Appeal no. 15 of 2008. Respondent DCLR by order dated 14.11.2009 (Annexure-4) allowed the said claim, as a result whereof, needful actions were taken inasmuch as correction slips were issued in the name of the writ petitioner. The petitioner thereafter paid the rent respecting the lands in question detailed in para 4 of the writ petition. It appears respondent nos. 6 to 18 filed Mutation Revision no. 56 of 2009-10 before the Collector. The respondent revisional authority to whom the case was assigned considered the matter and by order dated 25.09.2010(Annexure-7) allowed the said revision application and set aside the appellate order dated 14.11.2009 (Annexure-4). Learned counsel for the petitioner made diverse submissions in order to assail the revisional order. It is contended that respondent no.20 ( Jagidish Mishra) was functioning as Halka Karmchari of the said Revenue Anchal and he became Secretary of Chetnalay Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd. Kankarbag, Patna and manipulated orders in favour of the respondents. It is also contended that although the petitioner had appeared before the revisional Court but thereafter the order was passed ex parte since the petitioner defaulted in appearing on few earlier dates. However, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly agrees that orders passed by the revenue authorities creating Jamabandi 3 would neither creates title nor extinguish the same. Having heard the parties, this Court, in view of the said position is not inclined to interfere therewith. However, petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to remedy available in law. If the petitioner chooses to approach the competent Court of civil jurisdiction for redressal of her grievance then any finding recorded by the revenue authority relating to title/possession will not prejudice her claim/case. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)