IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12564 of 2011 ABDA @ ABIDA KHATOON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Panchayat Mukhiya is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of misappropriating the money with regard to the wages of muster roll labourers under the NAREGA Schemes. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the enquiry was done by District Supply Officer, Jamui, which is the part of the F.I.R., which reflects that the middle man and one Munna Pandit committed irregularities in the schemes. Though, the Inquiry Officer held responsible the Mukhiya and Panchayat Rojgar Sewak for irregularities. It is submitted by learned Sr. counsel that actually only certain irregularities have been found during enquiry. 2 Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against the Munna Pandit, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 9/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)