1 W.P.No.9812 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.9812 Of 2010 Rajendra s/o Sukhdeo Patil. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. Anand V. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri. V.H. Dighe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 5. Shri. A.N. Gaddime, Advocate, for respondent No.2. -------- CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE: 10th AUGUST2011 ORAL ORDER : 1) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 5 and Mr. Gaddime, Advocate, for respondent No.2. 2) None appears for respondent Nos.3 and 4 though served. 2 W.P.No.9812 of 2010 3) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if he is allowed to make fresh representation to the respondent-management requesting them to forward his proposal for getting B.Ed. pay scale to respondent No.5- Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon. He further prays that if the respondent-management do not forward the petitioner's proposal, as prayed for, he may be allowed to approach the respondent-Education Officer for appropriate action against the respondent-management. 4) Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order. 5) It is open to the petitioner to make representation to the respondent-management requesting them to forward his proposal for getting B.Ed. pay scale to the respondent-Education Officer. If the petitioner makes such a representation the respondent-management shall 3 W.P.No.9812 of 2010 forward it, after complying with formalities, if any, to the respondent-Education Officer within a period of four weeks therefrom. If the respondent-management do not take any action on the representation made by the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to approach the respondent- Education Officer for seeking appropriate directions against the respondent-management. If the petitioner makes any such application the Education Officer shall pass appropriate order on the application and, if he is satisfied, may also proceed to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the respondent- management. We hope that, the respondent-Education Officer shall also move expeditiously if any such application is made to him by the petitioner. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B. BHOSALE, J.) rsl