EG§E IJQERE Q? 'S§AT?ES%A&L EILPUR Tmsmk PETI'L‘EON {CMMINAL} H091 {was ?E’E‘E’£‘E@E§ER§ £€3MFLAENAE§T Anjali Tiwari, W] o Rah 111 Tiwari AgES abmlt 00 “8.3 Rf C Cf o karuna Shamkar Tragcu Jhamla Chowk Samav Naaar )miapruq Ralpul, D1stmc Raipur {C C E Pr‘reaas Staia of Ghhattisgarh, hrough Diatn'pi Qagnandgaov aC G1 . S1111. Rama Tlwan Wio gushli Tiwagz, Aged qgovt oé yam VSushi‘i Tiwa‘d, Sfo Lata Ram Gopal ,iWari, Aged about 57,3?6211‘3 Ranjwt Tiwari, S/o Sushi‘i'Tiwan', Ag€d abcut '28 years. amt Archaua Thval' W; o Railj66 irran Aacd about 20 Vears 911 reSyVAnfS 6f “Jag? P9tp'u T611511 {ié P S Dadgalgau1 D1st11c .. Rajnaxmgaon KC QT) RES?®MDEMT$ Magistra‘m, ymajmg Uzmw. mcmmg 497 9F THE @9133 {2F ammmAL ‘ 19Ra§m3wm mmawnr‘e - gmt Fouzla Ma‘za Voupsal for fh: pcutlol h copy. Slui S Cma1d€1 Paild JawyPr far ths SfatP on qcWanCE . RAI GKJE‘R 531 3m.&U083 / 3mL zévgmR €3§W§ a HEQId Tins p€t1t10n has bpen *Lal umkr Sec’uor 4G7 o 111:: Code o mmal Proneduw for nailsfbx 01" Crlmgaal C955 Na 196;”)00’ s f C ? wwwl is pandmg m $116 Conn of Jurhcwl \’Iag1$trat6 F115t Clas Donga1 gaih ; D1su1c+ Ra _ nancw'aon C u J EE E AS T Z " H T : " f A 1 § . J my“ ,MMMWJ.’.VA Transfrsr PeTitiOn {Criminm Nam/20% Laaraml (301111331 for ‘Lha pEtitionm‘ submits that £113 came of actiog 1'11 Tim matter arose i11 m€ tsmtorial jurisdiction of Raipur ‘ Court, .tharefors, tha Court at Dongm‘garh would havg no jmisdic‘iion m €11t91‘teu'i1 11m charga sh€€t Eed by ths polica Nsedlws to Say that fhi$ is net a ground for‘ traimfEr 0f a case mldar Sccu'on 407 of the Cede of Cdminal‘Procedure. Th6 po’mt of jurisdiction iS a qu€sfion of law, which call b5 raisad basfora: L116. cencenled Court, Wham Q16 cass is pmldmg alld if The dacision on mat yoim is not Satisfactory ta QM: Concsnmd pefiiioaa‘, he may avaiQ other remedigg umisr the law, but 'm any c5136, on this gmund alone, the pe’rition fxled Lmder Section 40? of the Code of C1imix1al Procedure would amt ee. In View of me above, thi$ petition is summarliy dismissed. oner gha‘d be at Ebert r to raise this. point before /. the conceieeo Couri in accordance with law. . .J/w However, the. pe / sw- SUNIL KUMAR 31M“ Judge v W.,‘.. L