IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 28TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1147 of 2011(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ANILKUMAR, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, ANIL SADANAM, GOVINDA MANGALAM, MYLOM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. 2. PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, -DO- 3. OMANA AMMA, AGED 58 YEARS, D/O.LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, -DO- 4. SUNILKUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.PRABHAKARAN PILLAI, NANDANAM, NADUKUNJUMURI, CHENGAMANAD P.O., VETTIKAVALA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE SRI.T.T.RAKESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM - 691001. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA - 691 506. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, 691 506. 4. SREEJAKUMARI, ALIAS MANJU, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O.MANI AMMA, ABHI NIVAS, GOVINDA MANGALAM, MYLOM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA 691 506. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRIT.K.VIPINDAS R4 BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P(C).1147/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1:A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKARA IN OP (HMA) NO.210/07 DATED 30.7.2007. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 21.12.2010 BEFORE the JFMC-1, KOTTARAKARA. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT TO the SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DATED 23.12.2010. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.1147 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 17th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The 4th respondent and the first petitioner were married. It is stated that now that marriage is dissolved. The 4th respondent is stated to have filed an application before the Family Court to set aside that ex parte order. As of now, the 4th respondent has given First Information Statement and Cr.No.3005/10 was registered by the Kottarakkara police for offences punishable under Section 498 A read with Section 34 IPC. While the petitioners mention different aspects of the controversies between the parties, we would only note that there is a crime registered and the investigation will proceed strictly in accordance with law. If the petitioners have a complaint of police harassment, they may seek recourse to remedies available before the District or State Police Complaint Authority as the case may be. We say so because WPC.1147/11 2 the petitioners say that they are made to go over to the police station and wait there indefinitely. Let the first respondent look into the complaint Ext.P3. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.18/2.