IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27335 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- YOUSAF MOTHYATHODA, S/O.KOYAKIDAVU, AGED 53, KEECHERI, ANDROTH ISLAND UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADEEP. BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL. S RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COLLECTOR CUM DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP KAVARATTI, PIN-682 555. 2. THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, ANDROTH ISLAND, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP, PIN-682 555. 3. SRI.C.NALAKATH MUTHUKOYA, ANDROTH ISLAND, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP, PIN-682 555. ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.27335 of 2010 (N) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance is regarding the alleged inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent on Ext.P1 application, where he complained about a dangerous coconut tree standing in the neighbour’s property, which is likely to fall on his residential house. 2. I heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents also. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P1 complaint has been received, it is necessary that the 2nd respondent shall deal with the same with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. This the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg