Crl. Misc. No. M-29612 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-29612 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 24.02.2011 Ramanpreet Kaur and another ..........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Ramanpreet Kaur and Jatin Kumar for issuing directions to official respondents to protect their lives and liberty from the hands of respondents No.4 to 7, as they have solemnized their marriage contrary to the wishes of parents of petitioner No.1 and are apprehending threat from the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that now the matter has been resolved between the parties and now no threat is there from the hands of private respondents and the petitioners are leading their happy married life. Learned counsel further submits that the only grouse of the petitioners is that passport of petitioner No.1 is with the private respondents and the same has not been handed over to her and if the same is handed over to her, nothing will remain against private Crl. Misc. No. M-29612 of 2009 (2) respondents. Since the dispute has been resolved between the parties and now no threat is there at the hands of private respondents, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. As far as issue of passport is concerned, petitioner No.1 may move an application to the S.S.P. Nawanshahr and if any application is moved, SSP, Nawanshahr is directed to decide the same in accordance with law and if the private respondents are found in possession of the passport, the same be returned to petitioner No.1. February 24, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No