IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10338 of 2008 NANHEY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 1.5.2008 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Garkha P.S. Case No. 45 of 2006 under Section 25(1-b)(A), 26 and 35 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard. Vide F.I.R. the allegation is that two criminals were seen going on motorcycle and when challenged by police party, one of them was apprehended and the other one managed to escape away. Further allegation is that on search arms and ammunition was recovered from the apprehended accused who also confessed that the motorcycle belongs to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was neither apprehended at the spot nor there has been any recovery from his possession. The learned A.P.P. submitted that the petitioner’s named was disclosed by the accused persons at the spot and that the petitioner is required to be put on T.I.P. In such view of the matters, I do not feel inclined to allow anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer is refused. (C. M.Prasad, J.) Ravi/- - 2 -