THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 7630 of 2009 Oral order: Even though the petitioner in the writ petition questioned the action of the respondents in trying to proceed with the construction works in H1 packages under JNNRUM scheme without canceling the agreement and without issuing him any notice and considering his representation dated 29.01.2009 for payment of the bills, but when the writ petition was taken up for hearing, he confined his relief to the extent of disposal of his representation dated 29.01.2009 made by him for payment of the bills. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, and having regard to the stand taken by the petitioner, as indicated above, both the counsel agreed to the disposal of the writ petition with the following direction: The respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 29.01.2009 made by the petitioner for payment of bills and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 15th April, 2009 KSR