IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * C.W.P NO.18564 OF 2006 Date of decision : November 27, 2006 * * * * * Pale Ram ............Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana & others ...........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA Present: Mr. Vikas Mor , Advocate for the petitioner(s). * * * * * Viney Mittal, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the selection of the Stamp Vendors. The petitioner claims that he is better qualified and as such was more suitable for the appointment. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we find that merely the fact that the petitioner has remained unsuccessful in a selection process cannot be a ground to interfere in the selection. No mala fides has been alleged nor any material has been brought to the notice of the Court that the selection process, in any manner, was vitiated. Dismissed. ( VINEY MITTAL ) JUDGE November 27, 2006 ( H.S BHALLA ) ritu JUDGE