:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.193 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.193 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.193 OF 2006 Baliram Shivram Patil ..Appellant. Vs. Sou.Sunita Baliram Patil & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.S.M.Kamble, adv. for the Appellant. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan, adv. for the Respondents. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. The appellant is original defendant. Respondent No.1 is his wife and the respondent no.2 is unmarried daughter of the defendant/appellant. They filed Regular Civil Suit No.841 of 2001 claiming the maintenance on the ground that the appellant had deserted them and had refused and neglected to maintain them. After hearing the parties, the learned trial Court passed a decree directing the appellant to pay the maintenance at the rate of Rs.1,000/- per month to the wife and at the rate of Rs.600/- to the daughter. The said judgment and decree was challenged by the appellant in Regular Civil Appeal No.354 of 2002. The appeal was also dismissed. The appellate Court observed that the appellant was holding 2 hectares and :2: 38 R. land and was taking crop of sugar-cane and paddy as per 7-12 extracts and was also holding jaggery house in one of the land owned by him. Taking into consideration these circumstances, the appeal also came to be dismissed. 3. In view of the concurrent findings of facts by the Courts below, I find no substantial questions of law involved in the matter. 4. Appeal stands dismissed summarily. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] :3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO.193 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.193 OF 2006 SECOND APPEAL NO.193 OF 2006 Baliram Shivram Patil ..Applicant. ..Applicant. ..Applicant. Vs. Sou.Sunita Baliram Patil ..Respondent. ..Respondent. ..Respondent. Mr.S.M.Kamble, adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan, adv. for the Respondent. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. DATE : JULY 6, 2007. P.C.: 1. As the Second Appeal No.193 of 2006 itself is dismissed, Civil Application No.428 of 2006 stands disposed off as infructuous. (J.H.Bhatia, J) (J.H.Bhatia, J) (J.H.Bhatia, J)