: 1 : chs-88-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER OF SUMMONS NO. 88 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1050 OF 2007 Sujata Kashinath Kadam & Ors. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Deepa D. Shirsekar .. Defendant And Kashinath G. Kadam & Anr. .. Applicants ......... Mr. B.V. Holambe-Patil for the applicants ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 20th OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. : 1. Mrs. Sujata Kadam, plaintiff no.1 has expired. By this chamber summons, applicants want to come on record in place of said Sujata Kadam, since deceased. Learned Counsel for the applicants state that copy of the chamber summons is served upon the defendant. Applicants to file affidavit in service. Statement made by learned Counsel for the plaintiffs as regards service is accepted. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. Looking to the text of the affidavit in ‌ : 2 : chs-88-10=.sxw support of the chamber summons, chamber summons is required to be granted. Hence, following order is passed. ORDER (i) Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). There shall be no order as to costs. (ii) Plaintiff no.2 to amend the plaint in terms of schedule to the chamber summons on or before 25th November, 2010, serve upon the defendant amended copy of the plaint on or before 1st December, 2010. (iii) After the service is done, plaintiffs to attend to the matter in accordance with the provisions of law as defendant has not filed vakalatnama. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)