CRLMB 472/2010 Babu Khan Vs. State (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.472/2010 Babu Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 10th February, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Bhandari Mr. S.S. Hasan, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Anil Upman, for the complainant. .......... Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there exists cross cases and so far petitioner is concerned, he himself sustained six injuries. He had not been attributed any injury which makes out a case against him under section 307 of IPC. Previously two other cases between same parties exist, other than that no other case exists. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant oppose the bail application and submit that though there exist cross cases and previously two cases, there may be other cases against the petitioner and if it comes out that there exists other cases then at least the complainant may be given liberty to file application for cancellation of the bail order, if granted. It is stated that injury is dangerous to life and has been assigned to the petitioner. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the CRLMB 472/2010 Babu Khan Vs. State (2) facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Babu Khan on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.230/2009 registered at Police Station- Khandela, District Sikar for offence under sections 143, 447, 323, 379 & 309 of IPC provided he, furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The complainant is given liberty to file application for cancellation of bail, if it is found that other than two cases there exist other cases against the petitioner. (M.N. Bhandari),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D45