1 30 caf.4489.10 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4489 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 28469 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. D.S.Joshi for the Applicant. Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar i/b Mr. Abhijit M.Adagule for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 06 th June, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1, who is the original claimant. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 has opposed the application by pointing out that the statements made in the application are vague and no sufficient cause is made out. He has placed reliance on certain decisions. 2 After having perused the application for condonation of delay, I find that though the same may not be happily warded, still a sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of 154 days. Considering the nature of 2 30 caf.4489.10 the dispute, the Applicant will have to pay costs to the Respondent No.1. The amount of costs is quantified at Rs.10,000/-. 3 Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The Applicant shall pay costs of Rs.10,000/- to the Respondent No.1 within a period of four weeks from today. Payment of costs shall be condition precedent. If compliance is not made within the stipulated time, this application will stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. [ A.S.OKA, J ]