1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3665 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3665 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3665 OF 2006 Pune Zilla Sahakari Doodh Utpadak Sangh. .. Petitioner. vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Company Ltd., & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. J.Shekhar i/by J. Shekhar & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP., for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Mr. P.P. Chawan i/by Little & Co. for Respondent No.1. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE: 3RD DECEMBER, 2008. DATE: 3RD DECEMBER, 2008. DATE: 3RD DECEMBER, 2008. P.C. . This petition raises an issue of payment of electricity charges for supplying electricity to the chilling plant at village Kondhapuri which was actually consumed and used by respondent nos. 2 to 5. In our view, the petitioner can always pay the amount on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 5 and recover the same from them. But, for this purpose the Court is not inclined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction for preventing the respondent no. 1 from recovering 2 electricity charges for the electricity consumed by the petitioner or respondent nos. 2 to 4. We, therefore, dismiss this petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent no. 2 to 5 to settle the account. In any event, that does not prevent the respondent no. 1 from taking appropriate action against the persons who are presently running the chilling plant to which electricity was supplied and consumed. In view of the fact that this Court has dismissed the petition, interim orders passed by this Court do not survive. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.)