IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.4810 of 2009 Between: Master Akshaya Manchala, S/o. Srinivas Manchala, Being Minor rep. by his father Srinivas Manchala S/o. S.Mallesham, aged 42 years, R/o. Flat No.401, Sri J.M.Mansion, H.No.3-6-504/A, Street No.7, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad-500 001 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Chaithanya Vidyala, (Affiliated ICSC Delhi) H.No.1-2-594, Domalaguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Administrator Smt. Jyothi Rao. 2 ICSE Board, 47-48, Pragathi House 3rd Floor, Nehru Place, New Delhi, Rep by its Secretary. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not promoting the petitioner into V Class for the next academic year and forcing the petitioner either to repeat IV Class or to leave the school as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner to 5th Class forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR. S. SRINIVAS REDDY The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.4810 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not promoting the petitioner to V Class for the next academic year and forcing the petitioner either to repeat IV Class or to leave the school as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioner to V Class. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the respondents have agreed to promote the petitioner to V Class and, therefore, the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 30th March, 2009. IBL