IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16992 of 2009 1. RAM BAHADUR RAI S/O SRI RAM CHANDRA RAI R/O VILL.- MARPA KOTHI, P.O. MARPA KOTHI, P.S. BAIRGANIA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE HEALTH COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCATION AND FAMILY WELFARE, BIHAR AT PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE, HEALTH SERVICES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, AT PATNA 4. THE COLLECTOR, EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI 5. THE DISTRICT MALARIA OFFICER, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI 6. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI ----------- 2. 29.01.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that his claim to be considered for appointment on a Class IV post by inclusion of his name in the concerned panel is covered by a similar decision of this Court in CWJC No. 14822 of 2005. Learned counsel for the State submits that it remains a matter of verification by the Respondents whether the petitioner was similarly situated in facts and in law when he may be entitled to be accorded similar treatment. The writ application is disposed off with direction to Respondent no. 2 to examine the claim of the petitioner in light of the order of this Court in CWJC No. 14822 of 2005 and if satisfied accord him similar treatment. If Respondent no. 2 proposes to hold that the case of the petitioner was distinguishable, he shall be required to pass a reasoned and speaking order setting out the issues of distinction, differentiation of the case of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order. Let this exercise be completed within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)