CP IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARh A^ BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) REVIEW PETITION N0.^2- /2011. PETITIONER: JR£VISIO ST: Smt. Kusumlata Patel, wife of Bhuwanlal Patel, aged about 59 years, Occupation Housewife, residence of village Baderampur, Wrad No.6, Tahsil and District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus ^espondents k Mohan Lal @ Ram Kumar, son of Late Paras Ram Patel, aged about 38 years, Occupation Agriculture, residence of O^ »^'"^^ ..<•*** village Baderampur, Tahsil and ^ ^<^"^^^ ^^p ^^" ^ \\ District Raigarh. 2. Shyam Kumar Patel, son of Late Paras Ram Patel, aged about 38 years, Occupation Agriculture, residence of village Regda, Tahsil and District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ,.^f::*^, ^&^ '^ 1^,.^! j ^ COURT QF^HHATTISGARHATSH.ASPUR Rey!ewPct|tiorLNu^2of2011 RESPQNDENTS Smt. KusumSata Patei. Versus IVSohaniai ailas Ramkumar and another REVIEW PETITiON (SB: Hon'b!e Mr. N.K. Aaarvval. J.) Prssent : Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate for the petitloner. (Passed on 27.09.2011) 1. Heard Shri CJ.K. Rao, Counsei for the revjew petltioner In Chamber under the provjsions of Ruie 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattlsgarh Ruies, 2007. 2. By thls petitlon, the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 21.6.2011, passed In W.P.(227) No.977/2010 (Smt. Kusumtata Pate! versus Mohan Lal and another). 3. After hearing the counse! appearing for the petitioner on the grounds taken In the reviev^ petltion, this court is of the opinion that the appilcant has falled to make out any ground for review of the order dated 21.6.2011 . 4. For the reasons mentioned herelnabove, the revievy petltlon i's dismlssed. No order as to costs. Sd/- ^ Judge