IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26456 of 2008 BIRENDRA TELI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 19.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that other co-accused persons were allowed bail. Petitioner’s prayer for bail was refused due to his being absconder. On merit also his name appeared in the confession of co-accused. For that he suffered much as remained in custody since 5.1.06. In my view, petitioner’s further incarceration is not justified. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C.V, Rohtas at Sasaram in S.T. 602/06 arising out of Sasaram (M) P.S. case no. 465 of 1995, subject to the condition that the default for a day without sufficient cause shall be made a ground for rejection. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI