^\^2^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARHAT BILASPUR Petitioner ^ 'f-^':^' goy ^_«'.-" ,.^1--\ '/v-l-" ^' .?'^1 '^ ^yl..--" <.c" ^•.•••'~ ^ ;s: W.P.NO..'?:.-5.:i?../06 >-Eal Sai Ram, S/o Late Kuchel Ram, Aged aboaut 58 years, R/o Irrigation Colony, Jeshpur Dist. Versus -1). State of Chhatisgarh Through: Secretary, Water Resources Departinent DKS Bhawan, Raipur Dist. CG State. ,2) Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur. CG State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APROPRIATE WRIT(S) / ORDER (S) / DIREDCTION (S), ETC. <<"^ ^1.^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATriSSARH AT BILASPUft W. P. ff) No. 7536 <rf 2006 ^ Petitioner : Bhuishan Khess Versus Respondents ; State of ChhatMsgarh ond ano-ther W. P. O No. TO37 of 2006 Petitioner : Sontosh (Aimar 5inha Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another And W. P. CS\ No. 7539 of 2006 Petitioner : Lal Sai Ram Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond onother SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Ayiihotri. J * Mr. ICft. Nour, Advocate for 1+ie petitioners. Mr. Sushit Dubey, (Sovemment Advocate for the re^)ondents/5tate OR&ER yassed on this 8til day of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that one T.6. Ramachandro Kurup similarly situated employee had filed o writ petition, being W.P. No. 670 of 2004, wherein this Court- after considering +he facts of the case gronted liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent au+hority of the respondents. The competent outhority of the respondents, in tum, was directed to decide the case of the petitioner on its own merit, in accordonce with law, ns early as possible, preferably, within three months from the date of receipt of the represen'tation. It is further submitted that several o+her persons howe also opproached this Court' in like monner ond on their representations, the competent cu'thority of the re^iondents hns gronted relfef. Further, the competent outhority of the respondents hos declined to grant cmy relief to tho% persons, who hod not approached to this Court. 2. In the light of the above aibmission, the petitioners are gronted liberty to make detailed representort'ions to the competent authority of the respondents. On such representations, being filed by the petitioners, the competent authority of -the re^iondents shall consider and decide the same on its own merit, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferobly, within a pariod of two months from the date of receipt of the representations. 3. These writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petitions. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge