IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3340 of 2011. Decided on: 16th May, 2011. Suman Kakshyap ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitioner is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued and the impugned Office Order dated 30.4.2011 at Annexure P-2, may very kindly be quashed and set aside since the petitioner has already served tribal/difficult area from the year 202 to 2006 at Govt. Sr. Sec. School Bali Chowki and again the petitioner has been transferred to tribal/difficult area of Sub Tehsil Bali Chowki i.e. Govt. Sr. Sec. School Sharti and as per the transfer policy, one employee time ad again cannot be transferred to tribal/difficult and further more, the petitioner has been transferred after a short stay of one year at the present place and as per the policy, she cannot be transferred prior to completion of normal tenure of 3 to 5 years. (ii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to continue to work at Govt. Sr. School Tandu till she completes her normal tenure as per the policy since the transfer of the petitioner is adversely affecting the study of her small school going children. 2 (iii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the petitioner in the light of couple case as per the provisions of the transfer policy since her husband is also serving as Range Forest Officer at Mandi.” 2. In the nature of this order, we propose to pass in this writ petition, it is not necessary for us to go into all the factual aspects of the matter. In the event of the petitioner filing a representation before the second respondent pointing out all the grievances including her long service in the tribal area within one week from today, the second respondent will look into the matter and pass appropriate order in accordance with law adverting to the submissions made in the writ petition and representation within two months. In the meantime, the petitioner may not be compelled to join at transferred station and in case she is relieved, it will be open for her to avail the leave of kind due. The petitioner may annex along with representation copies of writ petition and this judgment. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 16th May, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol ), (C/jai) Judge.