IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.974 of 2011 Dhananjay Kumar Verma s/o Late Ranjit Rai r/o village Chaibila, P.S. Darihat, Distt- Rohtas, at present resident of Mohalla- Chandmari Road, P.S. Kankarbag, Distt.- Patna. … Petitioner/Opposite Party. .. Versus.. 1. Smt. Pinki Kumari w/o Sri Dhananjay Kumar Verma and daughter of Sri Madhusudan Prasad Singh 2. Sonu Kumar Minor son of Sri Dhananjay Kumar Verma. 3. Khushi @ Moni Minor daughter of Sri Dhananjay Kumar Verma. Both are residing under the guardianship of Itheir natural mother Smt. Pinki Kumari and present residing ather maike in Mohalla- Chandmari Road, Road No. 4, near Sheo Mandir, P.S. Kankarbag, Distt. Patna. .. Opposite Party/Applicant. ----------- 4. 11.11.2011 This revision application has been filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 25.3.2011 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance Case No. 172(M) of 2008 by which the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.2000/- to his wife- opposite party no.2 and Rs.1000/- each to opposite party nos. 2 and 3 as ad interim maintenance and also directed to pay Rs.5000/- as litigation cost. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. It is an admitted fact that the 2 petitioner is the husband of opposite party no. 2 and father of opposite party nos. 2 and 3. By the impugned order learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court has passed the order regarding interim maintenance. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready to lead conjugal life with his wife- opposite party no. 2 and also ready to maintain her and her children. He has also filed a petition for restitution of conjugal life under Section 19 of Hindu Marriage Act bearing Matrimonial Case No. 163 of 2008. Learned counsel for opposite parties submits that the petitioner is not willing to lead conjugal life with his wife- opposite party no. 1 and neglecting her and her children. It is submitted that the petitioner has also withdrawn Maintenance Case No. 163 of 2008 which has been filed for restitution of conjugal life. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Additional Principal Judge has considered the contention of both the parties and has directed the petitioner to pay the amount of maintenance as aforesaid. The 3 case of maintenance is still pending before the Court below. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. I. A. No. 1691 of 2011 at Flag A filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in preferring this revision application also stands disposed of. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)