-1- Civil Revision No.1663 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: March 10, 2011. Civil Revision No.1663 of 2011 (O&M). Bahadur Singh and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Baljeet Kaur and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Sukhjeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The defendants-petitioners are aggrieved against the order passed by the trial Court whereby P.W. Sukhmander Singh, general power of attorney holder of plaintiff-respondent Baljit Kaur in a suit filed by her for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendants, was ordered to be cross- examined by the defendants in the suit. -2- Civil Revision No.1663 of 2011 (O&M). After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the impugned order, I do not see any reason warranting interference in the impugned order passed by the learned trial Judge. P.W. Sukhmander Singh, who had tendered his affidavit before the trial Court on 18.3.2010 was not cross- examined by the defendants on 18.3.2010 or on any subsequent date due to inadvertence. Interests of justice demanded that the trial Court ought to have given an opportunity to the defendants to cross-examine P.W. Sukhmander Singh, if they (defendants) so liked, which was done by the trial Court and rightly so. Dismissed. ( MOHINDER PAL ) March 10, 2011. JUDGE ak