IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 8TH OCTOBER 2009 / 16TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 20003 of 2009(U) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- DR.S.SURESH CHANDRA, READER IN ENGLISH, S.N.COLLEGE, CHATHANNOOR. BY ADVS.MR.M.BALAGOVINDAN MR.VINOD J.DEV RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, TRIVANDRUM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, KOLLAM. 4. MANAGER, S.N.TRUSTS, S.N.TRUSTS BUILDING, KOLLAM. R1 BY ADV. MR.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.MUHAMOOD T.T. R4 BY ADV. MR.A.N.RAJAN BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.20003/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE RELIEVING ORDER ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL S..N. COLLEGE, KOLLAM DTD. 3.10.08. P2:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD. 9.7.09. P3:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD. 2.4.09 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT THROUGH PROPER CHANNEL. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 20003 of 2009-U - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner who was working as Reader in English in S.N. College, Chathannoor at the time of filing of this writ petition, is aggrieved by the delay in sanctioning the leave on the basis of the application submitted by him. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submits that by order dated 16.7.2009, leave has been sanctioned and communications have been issued to the Principal of the S.N. College, Varkala wherein he is now working. Since the relief sought for has already been obtained by the petitioner, no further orders are called for in this writ petition. Since there is a complaint that the admissible salary has not been disbursed to the petitioner, he can approach the third respondent in the matter. If such a request is received, the third respondent will take appropriate action in accordance with law, expeditiously. The writ petition is closed. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/