IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6409 of 2010 SANDEEP KUMAR MARIK @ SANJEEV MARIK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 16.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. A dead body was recovered and informed by the Chowkidar to the concerned Police Station. In course of investigation, one Tripurari Rajak working at the deceased’s shop disclosed that in the evening of 14.11.2007 he along with the deceased went to temple where this petitioner along with one unknown person met his master, there was some talk and he was informed that they will come back after a feast but did not come back. This much was informed to the family members, they came in search of the deceased, came to the Police Station and found the dead body of informant’s brother. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was no enmity in between the petitioner and the deceased nor the petitioner has any criminal antecedent and the matter was not informed to any authority including Police Station by family members of the deceased even after knowing his disappearance on the next day but that is 2 sufficiently explained. The dead body is recovered on 16.11.2007. Post mortem report goes to show about the death in between 24-74 hours that includes the night of disappearance. The matter is under investigation so, the petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)