IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1177 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? Nos 1 to 5 No. -------------------------------------------------------------- SAHKARI BANK KARMACHARI UNION Versus MAHALAXMI MERCANTILE COOP BANK LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR TR MISHRA for Petitioner-Sahakari Bank Karmachari Union. MR BS PATEL for Respondent - Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co.Op.Bank Ltd. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 04/04/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT Both the sides have filed terms of settlement dated 4.4.1997 and it is requested that this Special Civil Application may be decided in terms of this settlement dated 4.4.1997 to which the parties have arrived at out of the Court. It is submitted that brother of the concerned workman has already been taken in the service of Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co.Op.Bank Ltd. and it is acceptable to the Union and the concerned workman in the full and final settlement to the claim raised through this petition and further that two concerned apprentices shall apply to Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co.Op.Bank Ltd. and the Bank would consider their case for appointment on merits as and when the vacancies are available.This Special Civil Application is therefore decided in accordance with the terms of settlement contained in the document dated 4.4.1997 filed by both the parties which shall remain on record as if it is a part of this order. This Special Civil Application is decided accordingly and the Rule is hereby discharged. No order as to costs. ----