IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.9 of 2009 Bhanu Prakash, son of late R.D.Prasad,BDO-cum- Executive Officer,Panchayat Samiti, Bhagwanpur Block Colony, P.S.Bhagwanpur, Begusarai --- respondent no.6/petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar 2.Orsil Paswan, son of late Shandchar Paswan, of village Harichak, P.O.Sanjai, Bhagwanpur, Begusarai 3.The State Election Commissioner, Bihar State Election Commission, Birchand Patel Path,Patna 4.The Joint Election Commissioner, State Election Commission, Patna 5.The District Magistrate-cum- District Election Officer, Begusarai 6.The Sub Divisional Officer, Teghra,Begusarai 7.Smt.Lakshmi Devi, Up-Pramukh, Panchayat Samiti, Bhagwanpur, Begusarai,w/o Mahesh Chaurasia 8.Sri Manoj Paswan, son of late Gore Lal Paswan 9.Sri Kapil Deo Rai, son of Shibu Rai 10.Sri Ramashish Sahani, son of Ramcharitar Sahni 11.Sri Ashok Bhagat, son of Chandradeo Bhagat 12.Sri Chamru Sah, son of Laxman Sah 13.Smt.Kanchan Devi,W/o Sudhir Chaudhary 14.Smt.Rita Devi,W/o Jay Jay Ram Paswan 15.Smt.Ganga Devi W/o Kedar Nath Ray 16.Smt.Tara Devi, W/o Manoj Sah 17.Smt.Pawan Devi (Banwaripur) W/o Shankar Mahto 18.Smt.Pawan Devi(Rasalpur) W/o Anil Kumar Chaudhary 19.Smt.Chandrakala Devi,W/o Chandramauli Singh 20.Smt.Pinki Kumari,W/o Binod Kumar Rai 21.Smt.Aruna Devi,W/o Prabhash Mahto 22.Sri Ganesh Das, son of Laddu Lal Das 23.Sri Lal Babu Paswan, son of Ram Shankar Paswan 24.Sri Ram Ujagar Mahto, son of Fitan Mahto 25.Sri Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, son of Arbind Sah 2 26.Sri Ganga Ram Chaurasia, son of Rambilash Chaurasia 27.The Panchayat Samiti, Bhagwanpur,Begusarai All O.Ps. 7 to 26 are members of Panchayat Samiti, Bhagwanpur and resident of Bhagwanpur Block, District Begusarai ---- Respondents/Opp.parties ----------- For the petitioner:M/S P.N.Shahi Dinesh Maharaj For the State :Mr.Arvind Kumar No.1, G.P.17. ----- 4. 8.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has filed this application to review the order dated 17.12.2008 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 14206 of 2008. The only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the observations of this Court in the said order the authorities, who have initiated departmental proceedings against the petitioner, would be prejudiced and in any case would pass adverse order against him. The aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not borne out from the order dated 17.12.2008 passed in the writ petition. This Court has considered the submissions made and the materials brought on 3 the record and on the basis of the same, including the report of the DDC, it was found to be a fit case for initiating appropriate proceedings against him. What appropriate action is to be taken was left to the wisdom of the authorities of the State and it has been stated in the order itself that they would act in accordance with law. Thus, there is nothing in the said order which requires to be reviewed. This application for review is, accordingly, dismissed. However, it is evident from the direction to ‘act in accordance with law’ that the authorities will act on the basis of the materials before them in course of the departmental proceedings or any other proceeding initiated against the petitioner. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/