Civil Revision No. 1990 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 1990 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.7.2010 Bhagat Ram …Petitioner Versus Satya Sibbal …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Kohar, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On 26.3.2010, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following order:- “...Argues, inter alia, that the impugned finding deserves to be invalidated for the simple reason that it came about without the learned Appellate Authority having decided an application under order 41 Rule 27 CPC, which had been filed with the appeal itself. Learned counsel for the petitioner further argues that the learned Appellate Authority did not even call upon the party opposite to file a reply. Civil Revision No. 1990 of 2010 2 Notice of motion. 22.04.2010. In the meantime, operation of the impugned order shall stand stayed”. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that that application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC was not decided and the appeal was dismissed. In this view of the matter, order dated 1.2.2010, passed by the Appellate Authority, Ludhiana, is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal afresh, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, along with application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 22, 2010 “DK”