THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Second Appeal No.175 of 2006 JUDGMENT: The respondents 1 to 6 herein brought the suit O.S.No.60 of 1999 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kodangal, against the appellants/ defendants for partition. On merits, the suit was dismissed by the trial Court. The plaintiffs’ appeal in A.S.No.10 of 2005 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet was allowed and by the impugned judgment and decree, the suit for partition of the respondents/plaintiffs was decreed preliminarily granting a preliminary decree for partition of the suit schedule properties into three equal shares and for allotment of one such separated share to the plaintiffs/ respondents herein while granting other consequential reliefs. 2. The aggrieved defendants had filed this second appeal. 3. On 20.08.2014, when the appeal came up, there is no representation for both the sides. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 27.08.2014 under the caption “For Dismissal”. However, the matter is listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even on this day, there is no representation for the appellants. 4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand dismissed. _____________________ M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J 10th September 2014 RAR