IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 42 of 2010 Central Bank of India …….Revisionist. Versus Smt. Susheela Devi and others …Respondents. Present : Sri P.C. Maulekhi, Advocate for the revisionist. Sri Kuldeep Rawal, Advocate holding brief of Sri Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard learned counsels for the parties. This is a revision under Section 25 of Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1988 filed by the landlord, challenging the order of the court below dated 21.8.2010 passed in S.C.C. No. 3 of 2008 Smt. Susheela Devi and others v. Central Bank of India. However on 23.11.2010, a direction was given by this Court to the revisionist to file an affidavit. Today, the affidavit has been filed, by which the revisionist has given an undertaking that he will vacate the disputed premises within one year from today. The revisionist is before this Court against a decree of eviction. In the order of the Small Causes Court, the revisionist was to handover the possession of the disputed property to the landlord within three months and it was also stated that he will also give an amount of ` 3,750/- per month calculated since 20.3.2008. All the same, in view of the affidavit filed by the revisionist before this Court, wherein he undertakes to vacate the premises within one year, he shall now vacate the premises on or before 31.12.2011. Meanwhile, he shall keep on depositing the rent including the entire arrears at the rate of ` 3,750/- per month, as given in the order 2 of the court below. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if the matter is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms and conditions, whereby the revisionist has given undertaking to vacate the premises within one year. With these observations, civil revision is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 13.12.2010 Avneet