t' £ HIQH_CQUCT'^F_GHHATTISOARH :BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. 4128 OF PETmONER RESPONDENTS 3. Smt. Sushila Porte, wife of Late Sri N.R. Porte, aged about58 years; working as an Accountant in the Office of the /tesistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Korba, resident of Hem Etecfronics, Indra Chewk, Vidhyut Mandal Office, Korba, Distt. Korfca (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG), Dy Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Commissioner, Triba! Devetopment Department, Raipur (CG). 4. The Collector, Korba, District Korba (CG). 5. The A.sstt. Commissfoner, Tribal Development Department, Korba, Distt. KorbaYCG). (Writ petitjon under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: ShriV.K.Pandey.counselforthepetitioner. Shri Yashwant Sjngh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General with Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyerfor the State. {Passsd on this30th day ofJuty,2008) the consent of iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petstioner does not want to press this petition on merits,af this stage. However, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decidg the representation dated 24-7-2008 (Annexure-P/4). in accqrdance with law.on its own merite, withirTthe prescribed time. 3) Leamed counsel appearing for the State submits that the representation dated 24-7-2008 (Annexure-P/4) shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordanGe with law, on its own merits, within a period of No weeks from th®date of receipt of the -2-' '^ Gowri 4) Learned counsel for the State further submite that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petjtioner, till the disposal ofthe representation. 5) ! hope and frust that the State Government shall examine the representation objectively in accordance with taw and guidelines, issued by the Government time to time. 6) In wew of the foregoing, the petitlon stands dteposed of. No order asto costs. 7) Consequently, application (I.A.No.1) for srant of interim relief also stands disposed of. _ sd/- Satish K. AgnUtdtri „ Judge ^ . Dliiii •!F;ll"t-t-i