IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 26728 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- P.C.VIJAYAN,AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.CHATAN KUTTI,PUTHENVILAYIL VEEDU,VENMANI P.O., CHENGANNUR,ALAPPUZHA (STUDENT,PART TIME B TECH MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEGREE COURSE 2001-2005, ADMISSIO NO.1090,T.K.M.C.,KOLLAM DISTRICT). BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH. K.RAJU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695034. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, THANGAL KUNJU MUSALIAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,KOLLAM-691005, KERALA. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATINS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695034. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR FOR R1&3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.26728/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1. A TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATIN OF THE PAPER ELECTRICAL LAB OF THE VTH SEMESTER OF THE PART TIME B TECH MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COURSE OF PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P2(a). A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD 27/2/2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2(b). A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD 8/9/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3. A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.C1/PTDC/2011 DATED 20/5/2011 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE THANGAL KUNJU MUSALIAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KOLLAM. EXHIBIT-P4(a). A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD 8/4/2011 SUBMITTEDB BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4(b). A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD 6/8/2011 SUBMITTEDBY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 26728 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 10th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a part time B.Tech Mechanical Engineering student of the college of which the 2nd respondent is the Principal. The college is affiliated to the 1st respondent University. He completed the course in 2005 and appeared for the paper Electrical Lab (Electrical Machine Lab) of 5th semester in the examination held on 8/7/2005 with Reg.No.2549. The copy of the hall ticket of the supplementary examination is Ext.P1. However, his result has not been published nor have the respondents issued the marklist so far. This is despite the petitioner making several requests for the said purpose. 2. This case came up for admission on 11/10/11 and adjourned on four occasions for the respondents to file a statement. Inspite of the opportunities so given, statement has not been filed and it is now submitted that the marklist could not be issued since the same has not been traced so far. 3. In my view, when a student has appeared in the examination, it is the responsibility of the University to value the WPC No. 26728/11 :2 : papers, publish the results and issue marklist and it is no answer to say that the marklist is not traceable. Therefore, I direct that the 3rd respondent shall trace out the marklist of the petitioner concerning the supplementary examination of the petitioner mentioned above and issue marklist to him. This the 3rd respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge