(1) ra201-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2895 OF 2011 Nanasaheb s/o Laxmanrao Folane PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. This is an application seeking review of the order dated 9th August, 2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 2895/2011. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the basic grievance of the petitioner in Writ Petition was that the petitioner was already promoted as a Naib-Tahsildar prior to the Rules came into effect on 7th July, 1999 which provided for passing of the qualifying examination, the same aspect has not been considered by the (2) ra201-11 Division Bench while disposing of the Writ Petition. 3. We find that the basic grievance of the petitioner with regard to applicability of the Rules which came into effect after he was promoted, has not been taken into consideration by this Court while disposing of the Writ Petition. 4. In this view of the matter, an error apparent on the face of record has been committed by this Court. Hence, the Review Application is allowed. The order dated 9th August, 2011 passed in Writ Petition No. 2895/2011 is recalled. The Writ Petition is restored to its original file. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/ra201-11