IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24834 of 2011 1. Urweda Khatoon @ Rubi Devi wife of Dayanand Yadav 2. Dayanand Yadav S/o Awadh Lal Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 18.8.2011 Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the petitioners be kept on the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 353, 216 and 225 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the allegations against the petitioner no.2, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.2 is rejected. As for the petitioner no.1, since she is a lady, let the petitioner no.1, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today in connection with Jadia P.S. case No.83 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an - 2 - affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if she is she shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )