IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3127 of 2010 1. PAPPU MUKHIYA SON OF LATE RAMPHAL MUKHIYA 2. RANJEET MUKHIYA SON OF SATYA NARAYAN MUKHIYA 3. RAJESH MUKHIYA SON OF SATYA NARAYAN MUKHIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the accused persons were armed with Pistol but the same was not used for causing any hurt to the injured and the petitioners have remained in custody since 19.9.2009 and have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 1035 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit 2 that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)