... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6299 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.29959 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri V.C. Deshpande for the Applicants. Shri Bhushan Walimbe i/by Shri R.V. More for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 31, 2006. : JULY 31, 2006. : JULY 31, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Application is strongly opposed by Advocate appearing for the Respondent. In view of the averments made in paragraph Nos.2 to 4 of the Application, delay deserves to be condoned. However, as delay is of more than five hundred days Applicants will have to pay costs to the Respondent. 2. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the Applicants paying costs of Rs.05,000/- to the Respondent within period of six weeks from today. Payment of costs will be condition precedent. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE