IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6319 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 6319 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 6319 OF 2006 1. Zuran Anton Soz & 5 ors. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 3 ors. ] .. Respondents Ms. Neeta P. Karnik for the petitioners. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. : . The order passed by the Revenue Minister on 15th June, 2006 is challenged. The petitioners, as per their own contentions, are the encroachers on a Government land and, according to the petitioners, they are covered by the Government Resolution dated 28th November, 1991. As per this Government Resolution, the list of encroachers between 1st April, 1978 to 1991 was to be prepared by the collector and thus encroachers were protected. However, in the list which was prepared by the Collector, the names of these petitioners were not included as encroachers. Their names do not appear in the 7 X 12 extract. They appear in the village : 2 : extract for the year 1991. The lands are within the area of Mira-Bhayandar Municipal Council. Mira- Bhayandar Municipal Council has informed that the land is under various reservations. 2. Taking into consideration all these facts the claim for regularisation has been rejected. It is a well reasoned order. No interference is called for. Petition is, accordingly, rejected. Interim stay vacated. Sd/- Sd/- [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]