IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 27544 of 2008 Between: E. Ramanna Goud, S/o. Narayanappa, Andhra Pradesh Rythu Coolie Sangam, R/o. Bapujinagar, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Sanjeevareddy Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus direct the respondents herein to produce the detenue namely R. Mohan Reddy @ Prasadanna @ P.S. S/o. Yella Reddu, aged about 50 years, Occ : Ex. Secretary CPI(ML) State Committee, R/o. Borabanda, Hyderabad, Hyderabad District, before this Hon'ble Court and record the statements of the detenue and set free and basing on his statement this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAGHUNATH Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27544 OF 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) The President of Andhra Pradesh Rythu Coolie Sangam filed this writ petition complaining illegal detention of one R.Mohan Reddy @ Prasadanna, Ex.Secretary of C.I.P. (ML) State Committee. The counter affidavit filed by the first respondent discloses that in execution of Non-Bailable Warrants pending against the alleged detenu since from 17.12.1997 issued by the District and Sessions Judge, Warangal in connection with Crime No.10 of 1987 on the file of Mulugu (Pasra) Police Station, Warangal, he was arrested on 20.12.2008, produced before the District and Sessions Judge, Warangal and was remanded to judicial custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the averments of the counter affidavit and seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) _______________ (R. KANTHA RAO, J.) DECEMBER 29, 2008 TSR