IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3228 of 2007 BALDEO RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6/ 10-Dec-08 Heard the parties. A peremptory order dated 13.12.2004 was not complied within the time leading to dismissal of contempt petition bearing MJC No.1774 of 2003. The reasons for non compliance in the original restoration petition suffered from glaring factual mistakes and therefore a supplementary affidavit has been filed seeking apology for apparent wrong statements. In view of such apology the wrong statements made earlier are ignored. There is no good explanation why the per emptory order was not complied within the time. However, since the matter relates to contempt proceeding and this Court would like to ensure that its orders are - 2 - complied, the prayer for restoration is allowed particularly in view of the statement that now the defects have been removed and properly typed annexures have been furnished. MJC No.1774/2003 is restored to its original file. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)