1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 943 of 2008 (Tirora Irrigation Sub-Divn., and others -: versus :- Milind Vinayak Ghodichor) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 18, 2010. Mr. S.G.Jagtap, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Atul Pathak, Advocate for respondent- employee, jointly inform that the writ Petition is covered by Judgment delivered by me, yesterday i.e. on 17/3/2010, in Writ Petition No.5614 of 2006 with other connected matters. Mr. Pathak informs that respondent employee has communicated to him his desire to change the Advocate, but papers are still not collected back from him. He, therefore, seeks discharge. However, as the matter was heard at length yesterday and a particular view has been taken, his request is rejected. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of judgment delivered in W.P. No.5614/2006 with other connected matters. JUDGE Diwale