..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1376 OF 2007 Shriram Khelaji Mayekar. ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Subhash Jha, Adv. i/b. Law Global, for the Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 30th April, 2007. DATED : 30th April, 2007. DATED : 30th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.108 of 2006 of GBCB, CID (EOW), Division - VII, Mumbai. The said case is mainly under Section 420, 406 of IPC. 3. In the present case the investigation is over and the charge-sheet has been filed. It is an admitted fact that the applicant is not the main accused in the said case and infact he acted ..(2).. as a agent for the main accused in the task of contacting various persons and convincing them to invest into the scheme of main accused. It is seen that the role played by the complainant in the present case is also somewhat similar to the present applicant. It is not the prosecution case that the applicant is likely to abscond or that he will tamper with the prosecution witnesses. 4. Looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant Shriram Khelaji Mayekar to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to GBCB, CID (EOW), Division - VII, Mumbai once in a week i.e. on Monday, till conclusion of the trial. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. . Authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the concerned parties. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)