FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8052 OF 2008 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 OF 2010 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2506 OF 2004 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2507 OF 2004 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2508 OF 2004 with CIVIL APLICATION NO. 2509 OF 2004 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6085 OF 2004 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6535 OF 2007 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6553 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3754 OF 1991 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Date : 8th January, 2010 1. None present for the applicants. Heard learned counsel for the intervenor. The intervention is sought on the ground that the intervenors are not members of the association, and as such may not get the benefits if the Writ Petition is allowed, though they are similarly placed alongwith other ( 2 ) members of the association. They have no separate interest nor can they contradict the petitioners. The learned counsel Mr. Choudhary submits that the intervention may be permitted in order to avoid multiplicity of the litigation. Considering the argument and the common interest shown by the intervenors, prima facie, the applications are allowed with leave to intervene, as prayed for. 2. The matters be tagged with Writ Petition No. 3075 of 1991. ( V.R.KINGAONKAR, J.) srm/ca/8052/08