IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 RPFC.No. 105 of 2003() ---------------------- MC.109/2002 of FAMILY COURT, MANJERI .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------ KRISHNA DAS MULLAN MADAKKEL, S/O. THALASSERIYAN, MILUNNUMMAL HOUSE, KOOTALUNGAL, CHERIYIL P.O., KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. MINI K.P., D/O. ARMUGHAN, KIZHAKKEPURAKKAL HOUSE, KANNAMANGALAM P.O., VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. NIJISHA - MINOR, REPRESENTED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT - GUARDIAN MOTHER. THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R.P.(F.C).No.105 of 2003 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the respondent husband in M.C.No.109/2002 in the file of the Family Court, Manjeri, who is under orders to pay maintenance to the wife and minor child. It is noted in the order of the court below that the marriage has already been dissolved on the ground of alleged mental illness of the wife. It was found, and rightly so, that he is bound to pay maintenance. 2. The evidence adduced in the matter consisted of the testimony of PW.1 and RW.1, the respective parties. 3. It was found that the revision petitioner belonged to a family who are hereditarily carpenters. It was considering the probable income of the revision petitioner/respondent maintenance at the rate of Rs.500/- for the petitioners in the M.C was ordered. Considering the fact that the amount is only reasonable, I find no interference is called for. The revision petition is dismissed. K.R.UDAYABHANU, Judge ms