1 WP1814/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1814 OF 2010 Govind s/o Namdeo Gore & Anr. Petitioners V E R S U S Asaram s/o Karbhari Watane & Anr. Respondents Mr. V.C. Patil, Advocate, holding for Mr. Sachin S. Bhise, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. N.H. Salunke, Advocate, holding for Mr. M.D. Gitte, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. N.H. Borade, AGP for respondent No. 2 / State CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 15th April, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenges the concurrent findings delivered by the authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, holding that the petitioners have encroached on a village road. 2. It is common ground that land Gat No. 32 of village Walkhed, Taluka Partur, District Jalna was sold by dividing the same into various pieces to various persons. One such piece of land was purchased by the petitioners. The petitioners, thereafter, constructed a house over it. The respondent No. 1 complained to the Tahsildar under the provisions of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code that the petitioners have committed an encroachment while constructing house on an established ‘village road’. The authorities below accepted his case. The findings recorded by the authorities below are 2 WP1814/10 factual and I am not inclined to interfere in such findings while exercising the jurisdiction of High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In view of above, petition stands dismissed. ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/15/4/11