IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 20391 of 1995 Between: G. Shantha Rao, S/o. Danial Samson r/o. Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Krishna Machilipatnam. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Muvva Mandal, Krishna Dist. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Machilipatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the notification issued under section 4 (1) vide Rc.No.G9-924/94 Dated 1.9.94 and under section 6 notice under land acquisition Act, Dt.22.8.1995 as illegal, arbitrary and violates the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. SRINIVAS REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR MR.T.L.K.SHARMA Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Mr. Srinivas Reddy representing Mr. T.L.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording his submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ T. Meena Kumari, J. 2nd September, 2004 va To 1 The District Collector, Krishna Machilipatnam. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Muvva Mandal, Krishna Dist. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Machilipatnam. 4 2 CCs to G.P. for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT). 5 2 CD copies