IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.870 of 2008(O&M) Date of decision: 24.9.2009 Subhash Chander ......Petitioner(s) Versus Mawasi Ram & others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.2. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.22795-CII of 200 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Affidavit of respondent No.1 is taken on record. COCP No.870 of 2009 The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that the respondents have deliberately disobeyed the injunction order issued by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jagadhri and upheld by the Additional District Judge, Jagadhri whereby respondent No.1 was restrained from interfering into his possession over the suit land except in due course of law. The allegation of the petitioner before this Court is that respondent No.1 has cut the crop with the help of respondent No.2. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, separate replies have been filed on behalf of the respondents wherein the allegations levelled in the contempt petition have been denied. It has been further stated that respondent No.1 is the owner and in continuous possession of the suit land. Since disputed questions of fact are involved, COCP No.870 of 2008(O&M) -2- the petitioner has an effective remedy under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any other remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances. September 24, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE