IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 10th day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 284 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Aftab .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime 09/2010, U/s 420, 406/34 IPC, PS Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ March 10, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that no specific allegation has been made against the accused applicant and the allegation made against him is civil in nature. He also argued that the accused applicant is not at all the beneficiary in the said transaction. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Aftab be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in like amount, to the satisfaction of JM, Roorkee. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.3.2010 PRABODH