IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.845 OF 2004 (M/S). Smt. Surender Kaur & Another ….. Petitioners Versus Civil Judge (J.D.), Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar & others. ….Respondents HON’BLE RAJESH TANDON J. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing of the order dated 02.07.2004 and 20.08.2004. As will appear from the order dated 20.08.2004 that the application has been rejected only on the ground that the petitioner could not explain the delay in filing the application for recalling the order. The court below has observed as under: ^^oknh }kjk vius izkFkZuk Ik= esa fcyEc dks {kek djus gsrq izR;sd fnu dk Ik;kZIr dkj.k u crk;s tkus ds dkj.k oknh dk izkFkZuk Ik= 68 x fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA oknh dk izkFkZuk Ik= 68 x fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA The application has been rejected on the aforesaid ground, opportunity is given to the petitioner to file a proper application and the court below shall adopt a justice oriented approach and shall not stick upon for each days explanation. Subject to the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Opportunity be given to file a proper application explaining the delay which shall be considered by the court below. Dated:13.09.2004. (Rajesh Tandon J) S.S.Negi