IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26897 of 2009 1. ANIL RAI 2. Nathuni Rai Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 28.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.1 is alleged for causing assault by means of fersa, while petitioner no.2 by means of bhala. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that injuries are found on the head and leg but without repetition and all the injuries are simple in nature. There is also land dispute in between the parties. Section 379 of I.P.C. is super addition. So, charge-sheet was submitted in the case for the offence under Sections 323, 324 and 504 of I.P.C. but cognizance is taken under Section 307 of I.P.C. So, petitioners are apprehending their arrest which in my view also appears not probable. Petitioners are on Police Bail. So, they are directed to remain on bail so granted to them in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 107 of 2005 pending in the Court of Sri D.M. Tripathy, J.M., Ist Class, Muzaffarpur. Let the order be communicated to the Court below through F.A.X. at the cost of the petitioners in connection with Bochaha P.S. Case No. 107 of 2005 in the Court of Sri D.M. Tripathy, J.M., 1st Class, Muzaffarpur. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)