IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23745 of 2009 1. BAUDHA KAHAR son of Rajendra Kahar, resident of village- Sheopur, P.S. Karaghar, District- Rohtas 2. Lalasu Ram son of Ghurahu Ram, resident of village- Gori, P.S.- Karaghar, District- Rohtas 3. Kameshwar Ram @ Ramesh Ram @ Rakesh Ram, son of Dularchand Ram, resident of village- Baraka Gaon, P.S. Nokha, District- Rohtas & 4. Arjun Ram son of Late Kariman Ram, resident of village- Parsathua, P.S. Parsathua, District- Rohtas … Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR … OP ----------- 3/ 16.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 25(1-b) a, 26,35 of the Arms Act, section ¾ of the Explosives Substance Act, section17 of the CLA Act and section 16(1) of the Unlawful Activities Act. Taking into consideration the fact that no recovery was made from the conscious possession of the petitioners and the recovery was made from the house of Dinanath Prasad and Mahendra Chandravanshi as also the fact that the petitioners have remained in custody since about a year, let the petitioners above named be released on provisional bail for a period of six months to be calculated from the date of their release on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ASJ (FTC) No.4, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with S. Tr. No. 413 of 2008 subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the petitioners will report to the Mahanth of the local temple within fifteen days of their release and file a certificate about the same - 2 - in the court. In case, they fail to do so, their bail will be liable to be cancelled on account of violating the condition for bail, (iii) that once the petitioners report to the Mahanth of the local temple, he is requested to evolve a method by which without affecting the petitioners’ present vocation, if any, the petitioners can be made socially productive so that an effort is made to bring them back in the main stream of the society and (iv) at the end of the six months, the petitioners will be required to file a certificate in the court below granted by the Mahanth, and if the conduct of the petitioner is found satisfactory the court below will confirm the provisional bail of the petitioners. In view of the fact that the trial has already started, the petitioners are directed to be represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)