IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1665 of 2008 ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY Versus RAMESHWAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 3. 24.10.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the court below was required to pass a clear order even if it has been satisfied for taking those documents on record by way of secondary evidence. The order as a matter of fact even does not disclose as to what has weighed upon the court to take such documents on record and in this context the grievance of the petitioner seems to be correct that his specific plea as raised against the documents in question was not even noted much less decided in a proper manner. That being so, this Court would hold that the impugned order is a bad order and accordingly, the same is set aside with a direction to the court below to reconsider the issue in the light of the materials on record and after hearing the parties pass a fresh order in the aforesaid matter strictly in accordance with law. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)