IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.7908 of 2009 Between: J.V. Mohan S/o. G. Krishnaiah R/o. 211, Mudfort, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Gopalpuram, Secunderabad. 3 Sunitha Shakelli D/o. Hanumanth Rao R/o. Flat No.305-B, Amsri Residency Dharam Karan Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 4 M/s. Amsri Builders, A partnership concern, having its office at 9-1-164, Amsri Plaza, 5th Floor, S.D. Road, Secunderabad, rep. by its Partner Patnam Amruth Prasad and Uppu Srinivas. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in interfering with the peaceful possession of the suit schedule properties Flats bearing No.203, 204,205,206, 304,305,405,505,801,802 Grandee, and 103,104,105,204,901, 902,903,904,905, Knight, in the complex known as Amsri Central Court bearing Municipal House No.10-3-160/1 (Old No.16/A) Old Lancer Lanes, Secunderabad in O.S.No.10/2008 and O.S.No.11/2008 on the file of the I Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, as illegal and arbitrary and consequentially direct the respondent No.2 to not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the properties of the petitioners. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.L.ALI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME MR. B. VIJAYASEN REDDY The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.7908 of 2009 ORDER: The main grievance of the petitioner is that, at the instance of the unofficial respondents i.e. respondents 3 and 4, the 2nd respondent- Station House Officer, Gopalapuram Police Station, Secunderabad, is interfering in the civil disputes between him and the unofficial respondents, and pressurizing him to handover the possession of the property belonging to him to respondent No.3, though civil disputes are pending in respect of the said property, and is also harassing him by summoning to police station and making to sit in the police station without any reasonable cause or purpose. A counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, wherein, while denying the allegations made by the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner was never summoned to the police station at any point of time and that the respondent police never interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. It is further stated that no case is registered against the petitioner as of now and, hence, summoning him to police station does not arise, and only to prevent the police from taking any action in future if any complaint is lodged against him, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. In view of the aforesaid specific denials made by the respondent police, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 27th April, 2009 IBL