CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.2409 OF 1990 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. SRIMATI JHAMELA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI YADUNANDAN PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR AMERA, P.O. BHATAHER, P.S. CHANDI, DISTRICT NALANDA. -------------------------------------------(PURCHASER)-------------- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ADDITIONAL MEMBER OF BOARD OF REVENUE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, NALANDA 4. LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, HILSA 5. RAJENDRA PRASAD, SON OF SRI NILKANTH MAHTO (DEC.) RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR AMERA, P.O. BHATAHER, P.S. CHANDI, DISTRICT NALANDA ------------------------(APPLICANT)---------- RESPONDENTS 1ST PARTY 6. PRASADI MAHTO, SON OF NANHKU MAHTO (DECD.) 7. KRISHNA KUMAR SUMAN, SON OF SRI PRASADI MAHTO BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAMPUR AMERA, P.O. BHATAHER, P.S. CHANDI, DISTRIDT NALANDA. ------------------------ (VENDORS)------------ RESPONDENTS 2ND PARTY For The Petitioner : U.L.VERMA For The Respondent :(SC3) P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN S.A. Khan, J. The petitioner’s revision application has been dismissed by the Board of Revenue on the ground that it was barred by limitation. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. No one appears on behalf of respondents, although notices were validly served. 3. The matter is remanded back to the Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna to consider this case on merits. The petitioner is given liberty to file an application and limitation petition afresh within a period of two months on receipt of 2 this order. Respondents ought to be noticed in both matters, which should be disposed of by a common order. The order, dated 27.3.1990 is quashed. 4. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. Patna High Court, 5th of August, 2010 N.A.F.R./Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)