IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16910 of 2011 Date of decision: 09.09.2011 Kashmir Chand and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Ms. Seema Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that respondent No.4 was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 420/457/468/471 IPC read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, therefore, respondent No.4 should not be allowed to continue on the post of Sarpanch. She further states that a representation (Annexure P-1) was moved before respondent No.2, however, no action is being taken thereon. Without expressing any opinion on the merit and maintainability of the representation (Annexure P-1), respondent No.2 is directed to take decision on the representation (Annexure P-1) within 90 days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before him. Petition stands disposed of. (Alok Singh) Judge September 09, 2011 R.S.