IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.286 of 2011 Chandra Shekhar Sagar ………..Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …….Respondents Shri Anurag Bisaria and Shri H.S. Dhillon, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.S. Bohra, learned Brief Holder for the State. Dated: 22nd April, 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the First Information Report dated 11.06.2009 registered as Case Crime No.143/09 under Section 302 I.P.C. at Police Station Kotwali, Laksar, District Haridwar. 3. Brief facts of the case are that on 11.06.2009 Smt. Dayal Sagar lodged an F.I.R. at Police Station Kotwali, Laksar, District Haridwar stating therein that same day at about 7:30 p.m. when her husband Shri Satender Sagar was coming back to his home on cycle at Maal Godam Road, Seemely, near Sunil Pandit’s residence, three unknown persons shot dead the complainant’s husband. The said persons after committing the crime ran away by motorcycle. She requested that her F.I.R. be registered. In the 2 meantime, the investigation was conducted by S.H.O. Police Station, Laksar. On 06.04.2011, Sub Inspector Kotwali, Laksar issued a notice to the petitioner under Section 160 Cr.P.C. asking him to appear for giving evidence. Thereafter, on 07.04.2011 a newspaper report was also published in Amar Ujala, in which it is mentioned that Circle Officer informed that the petitioner got his brother murdered by giving SUPPARI to three sharp shooters namely Mahesh @ Pappu, Vipin and Rakesh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the newspaper report, it is clear that the concerned Police is going to arrest the petitioner, whenever he reaches Police Station. He further submitted that petitioner remained in the custody of the concerned Police for six days in the year 2009, when his brother was murdered, but the concerned Police did not record his statement and the petitioner was released when his wife approached the Chairman, Human Rights Commission, New Delhi, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and Director General of Police Uttar Pradesh. He submitted that Police is going to falsely implicate the petitioner in the matter and the petitioner apprehends that he will be arrested, implicated in the matter and named in the charge sheet. He further submitted that this fact is proved from the reading of the newspaper cutting, which was published on 07.04.2011. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is not convinced with the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, as First Information Report fully discloses the crime of murder committed by three unknown persons, which does not show whether the petitioner is involved in the case or not. It is for the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and submit its conclusion in the same. I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 6. The writ petition is dismissed summarily. Interim Relief application no.3031 of 2011 also stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 22.04.2011