IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.80 of 2007 (M/B) Maneshwar Prasad Agarwal, S/o Late Sri Rameshwar Prasad, R/o Najibabad Road, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand. 2. Station House Officer, Pauri, District Pauri Garhwal. 3. Anand Bihari Dobhal S/o Sri Pati Ram Dobhal, R/o Village Dobha, Patti Idwalsyun, District Pauri Garhwal. ……. Respondents Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajednra Dobhal, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Maneshwar Prasad Agarwal seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous, as the police, after the completion of the investigation, did not find any case worth filing charge sheet against the petitioner and as such, a final report has been submitted in the case before the concerning court on 05.05.2007. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 17.01.2007 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 08.05.2007 08.05.2007 G