IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.W.P.No.1613 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 7, 2010 Mohar Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K.Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3(1)(d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, is for issuance of direction to the respondents to consider and decide the house repair parole case of the petitioner. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already moved a petition in this regard before Superintendent, Central Jail, Ambala, i.e., respondent no.3, who forwarded the same to District Magistrate, Patiala, i.e., respondent no.4, vide dispatch No.5025 dated 10.5.2010, and respondent no.4 also sent his report to the office of respondent no.2, vide letter No.1573/Peshi dated 14.7.2010, and however, the same has not been decided so far. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application of the petitioner, already stated to have been moved before respondent no.3, as per law, Rules and Instructions on the point, within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge