IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10872 of 2005 LAXMAN PRASAD CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02/ 06.08.2008 Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid his P.F. amount for the period 22.9.1965 to March 1986 with statutory interest. He further submits that the petitioner’s case has not been considered for second time bound promotion during his service. He further submits that necessary averments have been made in paragraphs-11 and 12 of the writ application. He also submits that direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within a fixed time. In the circumstances, this application is disposed of with a direction to the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas as well as District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas to consider the case of the petitioner for his second time bound promotion and his dues of P.F. from 22.9.1965 to March, 1986 respectively. If the respondent-District Superintendent of Education finds that the petitioner is entitled 2 for second time bound promotion, he shall pass appropriate orders for the same from the due date with consequential benefits of payment thereof. Similarly, if the respondent-District Provident Fund Officer finds that the P.F. amount of the said period has not been paid to him with statutory interest, he shall order for payment of the statutory interest to him. Both the District Superintendent of Education and District Provident Fund Officer shall pass final orders in this regard within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the above observations and directions this writ application is disposed of. ( J. N. Singh, J. ) A.H.