IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER FRIDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1930 Cont.Case(C).No.1266 of 2008(S) ----------------------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.NO.1206 OF 2004, DATED 9.4.2008 & THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.4585/2000-U, DATED 29.10.2003. .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:- -------------------------------------------------------------- P.JAYABALA, AGED 58 YEARS, W/O K.M.BABY RAJAN, SUSHREE MANISSERI P.O., OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU. RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT:- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- K.K.JANARDHANAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O LATE KESHAVA MENON, 3/15,SIVANADAPURAM, PALGHAT, GENERAL MANAGER, THE PALAKKAD DIST. CO-PERATIVE BANK LTD., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (Civil) No.1266 of 2008-S ---------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 7th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. The petitioner in O.P.No.4585/2000 is the complainant in this contempt petition. She alleges that, the respondent has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court while disposing of O.P.No.4585/2000. Accordingly, has filed this contempt petition requesting this Court to take appropriate proceedings against the respondent for the so-called disobedience of the orders and directions issued by this Court. 2. This Court, while disposing of O.P.No.4585/2000 by order dated 29th October, 2003 has issued the following directions: “In the result, the Original Petition is allowed. Exts.P4 and P5 are quashed. The petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. They shall be released to her within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment.” 3. Sri.M.P.Ashok Kumar, who took notice for the respondent, on instruction, would submit that, whatever consequential benefits that have to be paid in view of the quashing of Exts.P4 and P5 COC No.1266/2008 -2- orders by this Court, have already been paid to the complainant/petitioner. 4. In view of this development, in our opinion, for the present, we need not have to take cognizance of this contempt petition. Accordingly, we close the contempt proceedings. 5. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner, to approach appropriate authorities by filing appropriate petitions, if, for any reason, the petitioner is of the view that all the consequential benefits are not paid to her in full. 6. I.A.No.547/2008 is closed. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE MS