m ,^f*^!^- %maijl BEN^ ^tS'ii^'1'*^' ^ 3-^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. ttil'2_ Qp 2010 PETITIONERS 1 /<c? y i y .{':J)< ^ /^ ^^ y ^^ ^•^(y ')W te. ^' .••".^ °".-?' .s/ ^^ .3. Yaswant Kumar Yadav, S/o Batakram Yadav, aged about 26 yeare, Occupation Service working on the post of Shikshakarmi Grade-tll at Primary School Soripara, Block Mainpur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) Smt. Rashmi Ransingh, W/o Shri 1):.R.: Ransingh, aged about 30 years Occupation Senrice working on the post of Shikshakarmi Grade-111, at Primary School Indrapara, Block Mainpur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) Tejram Sahu S/o Shri Sewak Ram Sahu, aged about 29 Years, Occupation Service working on the post of Shikshakarmi Grade-111, at Primary School Magradih, Block Mainpur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) VERSUS '•>\ '^ ^-^- RESPQNDENTS .•^'..-••^ i^.^ S^"'^ ^r^i ^•^n^t ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, District- Raipur,(C.G.) , 2. Director Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) V" ^ ^ ^'^\ / 3. Collector, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) ^ 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Mainpur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 6. District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA 1. ^arti£ylars-ofthfi-DGtttio«>°~- y -\ °i(——-4fS--:M1 :[^^'?WEE" m mOH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRTTPETmON(S') No. 442 of2010 PETmONERS : Yashwant Kumar Yadav & Otfaers. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Asidhotei. J. Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer fw tfae State. ORALORDER (Passed on O lat day of Febroary, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, ou instructions, submits that the reliefsought for in this petition has akeady been granted to the petitioners. Thus, this petition has become uriruetuous. 2. Leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State does not CQtifa-overt the aforesaid submission. 3. In view of the above, Ihe writ petition is dismissed as having become inJfruetuous. ~—- Sd/- SATISH K. AGNMOTRI Judge Amit