^^/<^z- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER W. P.(S). N0. s'£s6 /2006 GajadharPrasad Sahu 'y oV^<;/ ..•• S/oShriNirbhayramSahu .4»y-^' ..-••' -^^\ ^(^vv %>Ay ci'\<^ Age about47years, Village-Paloud Post-Tekari Tehsil - Abhanpur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh y Through Secretary Educational Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Drictt.-Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer^ Raipur, District-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submits as under:- (S>- *. HISH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fS) No. 5635 of 2006 PetitkNier : Meghancrth Yadw Versus Respondents : Sfarte 6ovt. of Chhuttisgarh A orwthcr W. P.fSlNo. 5636 of 2006 Petitioner : Scijadhar Prasad 5ohu Versus Reapondents : StateSovt.ofOihatHsgarhAano'ther W. P. fS) No. 5637 of 2006 Petitioner : (tgBwahonkar 6uptn Versus Respondents : State 6<wt. of Chhatl'ia9arh A ano'ther W. P.fSiNo. 5638 of 2006 Petitionw : Teekam Lal Sinha Versus Reapondents : Stetefiwt.ofChhuttiagnrhAano'thcr W. P. fS) No. 5639 of 2006 Pktitioner : Smt. Sunita Pnl Versus R<sponden*s : StateSovt.ofChhattKtgarhAarwlher W. P.faNo. 8640 of 2006 Petitioner : AtehboobKhan Quroiahi Veraus ftespondcnts : Statv6avt.af CWwrtiayrh&aiw^wr W. P.fS^No. 8641 of 2006 Ptetitioner : Smt. Jagestwri Bha9el Veraua Respondents : S(trt«6Bvt.ofCWNrttfagarh4ano1hw W.P.faNo.5642<>fZ006 Petrtioner : Tulendra Kumnr Tiwuri Venus fteapondents : Stn'te 6ovt. of ChhattKgorh A anolhw W. P.fStNo. 5643 of 2006 Petitioner : Ramaytnr Vadnwa Wanus Reapondents : StinteSovt.ofChhutlKgarhAdnBlher Rfflitioner ReapondBnts Retitioner Respondents Petitioner Reapondents Petrtioner Respondents Ptetitioner &Bspondents Pktitwner Rcapondwrts Petitwner Respondents Petitioner Reapondwrts Petitioner RcsDOttdcnts W. P. (51 No. 5644 of 2006 : AnujRamSnhu Veraus : StateSovt.ofChhffMisgarhAano'HKr W. P.fSiNo. 5646of 2006 Rayendv Ifiumar Supta Wersus : State6ovt.af Chhattiagorhdonolhcr W. P. f5) No. 5647 of 2006 ; SharadTwnri Versua : StateSovt.ofChhcrt-tiayrhAaw'ther W.P.fStNo.S648of2006 : MnhendraProaudShukla Versus Shrte 6wt. of Chhattisgarh A anolhcr W. P.fS^No. 5673 of 2006 fiunbhooahan Snhu Vwraus Stut»6ovt. of Chhattiagnrh A anothcr W. P.fStNo. 5674 of 2006 : Snt. Jayu Tiwari Versus : Stn*e6ovt.ofChhattis9crhAano-rticr W. P.fSlNo. 5675 ef 2006 : Tuka Ram Chandrnkur Versus State 6ovt. of ChhaMiagarh Aano'rtter W. P./aNo. 5676 of 2006 : Ramesh Kunaar Vcrnia Veraua : Statefiovt.ofChhanisgnrhAarwther Aid W.P.fSiNo.5677ofa)06 Versus Ohanaay Ratel Stutc 6wt. »fChha*tia9arh AonoltMir Siigto Bmwh: Hon'bleMr.JusticeSatiak K. AgnUwtri. 5hri Ajay Shrivastuau, Advocote for •the Petitionws. Snit. Aiju Ahuja, t>y.<j6ovt. Adwcate for •rtic reapondents/Stute. ORDER (26tlt October. 2006) 1. Lcumed counsel oppenring for •the petitioners aubmits •tha* while working as Asaistant TeacheraAlpper Owision TeaehersAjechirers, •Ihe petitioners haw 9»nB on *ruinin9 to improve their quaBfications on -their oin expcnaea ond acquired B. Ed7B.TJ Examination Certifictrte. The present writ petitions, bcing WJ>^5) Nos. 5635/2006, 5636/2006,5637/2006. 5638/2006. S639/2006. 5640/2006, 5641/2006,5642/2006. 5643/2006, 5644/2006, 5646/2006. 5647/aX»6.5648/2006, 5673/2006.5674/2006. 5675/2006. 5676/2006 and 5677/2006 nwlw aimilar fccta and common question of taw. Thus, Iheae petitiona are bwing dispwed of by Ihis common ordu". According to leurned counsel for Ihe pctitionws, •the petitinners ere entitled to •hiw odvunce inGrements in vie*»of 1he decision of 1his Cowt h Ihe oaae of yoah»Mnt Kunur &iaradwBy V& AAunicipal Corporution, Durg and anolher {2006 (EE) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court h Ihe case af yaahwnnt Kumar BharadtiKy Vs. Municipul Corporution. Dur9 and anelhw 4 (Supra), coune to ihe conclusion •that Ihe tuichcrs. who had obtnined B.EA/B.TJ. Exumination Certificute on his own expenses, are covered by Ihe drculor datcd 24.1258 isnied by •the Stute fiovwnment of <Aadhya PmdMh. 4. L»imedcounsel for Ihe petitionws further aAmit»Itwt Ihe faets and qucstion of la»inmlved in 1h«present cns»sar» squordy cwred by decision of Ihis Court- h •the caae of Yaah-ant Kumur BharadtNiy Vs. Municyal Corporntion, Dirg and uwlher (Supra), to tihich leamed counaBJ appcaring fur •the respondcnts ftdrly conoedes and agrcus wth the <n»nncnt made by leamed counsel oppearing for •Ihe pctitioners. 5. Accordirgly, Ihe writ petjtmw nre allawed in terms of Ihe order passed in Ihe cnse of yaahwant Kunnr Bharodwuy Vs. Municyol Corponrtfon, Dur9 anif arwther (Supra). aibjae* to wrificottion of the fnct as to Nihe-rtier th«petrfioners haws acquired B. EA/B.TJ. Btaminutwn Cwtificate on Iheir O«NII expenacs or not. No order as to casts. 6. A copy of -this ordw be plaeed on record ef olher connectad writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Babhi