IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 286 of 2011 Decided on: 1.9.2011 Nihal Singh …Petitioner Versus Shri A.J.Y. Parshad …Respondent Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondent : Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, CJ (Oral) : Petitioner complains that the judgment in CWP No. 8261 of 2010 has not been complied with within the time granted by this Court. It is seen from the reply that the judgment has been complied with by passing Annexure R-4, order, though belatedly. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application for extension of time had already been filed before this Court. Still further, it is pointed out that Annexure A-4, order is not passed by the respondent, but by his successor-in- office. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to challenge the order on all available 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- grounds. 3. In view of the above submissions, the present contempt petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged ,with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedies against Annexure A-4 in appropriate proceedings. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 1, 2011 (Bhupender/K. Attri)