IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43495 of 2010 SATISH PANDEY, SON OF TEJ NARAYAN PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2008 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code Admittedly, the above stated case was registered against unknown persons on 27.11.2008 i.e. after one day of the alleged occurrence. It appears from the rejection order that in course of investigation, somebody claimed to have identified the petitioner and subsequently, Informant also claimed to have identified the petitioner. Moreover, having similar allegation, one co-accused namely, Upendra Sharma has already been granted privilege of bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.4.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. 6070 of 2009. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with above stated Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2008. S.Ali (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)