IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32275 of 2008 AJAY KUMAR MISHRA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NOORUL HODA ----------- 05. 02.08.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner who is the informant of the case, has filed the present application seeking cancellation of bail granted to O.P.No.2 by order dated 12.06.2008 by a Bench of this Court. A submission was advanced before this Court that the name of O.P.NO.2 transpired through the confessional statement of one Md. Rizwan. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in fact the name of O.P. No.2 had transpired in confessional statement of more than one person. It is next contended that O.P.No.2 is also stated to have made a confessional statement before the police. On these grounds it is submitted that the order granting bail to O.P.No.2 requires to be interfered with. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P.No.2, on the other hand, submits that trial is going on in which he is appearing regularly and only two witnesses are left to be examined. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has no instruction to this effect. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court is of the view that no case - 2 - for cancellation of bail has been made out. O.P.No.2 shall continue to appear on the date fixed at the trial in order to get the matter expeditiously disposed of. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )