IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 06.10.2010 COCP No.349 of 2010 Vijay Singh ...Petitioner Versus Surina Rajan and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Divay Sarup, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anoop Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Short reply by way of an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein it has been stated that the entire service rendered by the petitioner in a privately managed school has been taken into consideration for the purposes of pension and other retrial benefits. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. The same is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Rule discharged. 06.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE