IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15995 of 2006 Suresh Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shiw Kr. Prabhakar, Advocate Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Awadesh Kumar, AC to SC-17 ……….. 2 25.07.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the statement made in Paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State that the site of construction has been changed in the year 2007 itself, this writ application has become infructuous As a result, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)