(1) WP. 2422.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2422 OF 2010 Annapurnabai w/o Apparao Thite .. Petitioner VERSUS Vaijinath S/o Shambhu Thite and others .. Respondents Mr. S.J. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for the respondent-State Mr. S.P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the respondent no.1 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 9TH JULY, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned counsel. Petition involves various disputed questions of fact pertaining to the transaction of sale in respect of the land which originally bore survey no.108. The petitioner claims to have purchased the disputed land from Subhadrabai Shripati Thite. It is true that her name was initially mutated on the basis of the sale deed. The mutation entries were challenged. Civil Court it seems to have held that one Vaijanath Shambhu Thite is owner to the extent of land gat no.16 admeasuring 1H 50R and that injunction order was passed against the vendor of the petitioner i.e. Smt. Subhadrabai. In this view of the matter, the impugned order (2) WP. 2422.2010 whereby the mutation entry is cancelled by the learned Additional Divisional Commissioner cannot be regarded as arbitrary or perverse. The Petition is liable to be dismissed inasmuch as it requires determination of certain disputed questions of fact. Hence, it is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp