IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3678 of 2011 SURITH MEHTA & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.6218 of 2011 UMESH MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the husband and family members of the husband are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I. P. C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner, Umesh Mehta of Cr. Misc. No. 6218 of 2011 being the husband is ready to pay Rs. 1500/- per month to the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant has only objection with regard to quantum of offer and not the actual offer. In view of the aforesaid stand of the parties, this Court is not deliberating on the merits of the accusation. Considering the aforesaid facts, let 2 the petitioners, Surith Mehta, Jaymanti Devi, Santosh @ Munna Mehta, Uday Mehta, Sumitra Devi and Umesh Mehta be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 383 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let the aforesaid amount be deposited in the account of the complainant in the first week of every month from April, 2011. Learned counsel for the complainant will supply the account number to the petitioner (Umesh Mehta) within a period of ten days. The aforesaid order will not preclude the parties to reconcile their dispute. If they are so willing then they can file petition before the learned court below. Let the order be faxed to the 3 learned court below at the cost of the petitioners. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)