IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4266 of 2008 Between: Petla Naga Raju S/o. Nooka Raju R/o. Near Govt. College, Jangareddygudem, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2 The Station House Officer, Jangareddygudem P.S., Jangareddygudem, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.K.AMERENDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in taking action on complaint, dated 23.02.2008 filed by the petitioner, as arbitrary and illegal. At the hearing, Sri P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though there are two separate complaints given by the petitioner and his friend Kaki Chandra Mahesh Mouli, the respondents registered only one complaint. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, admitted that both the complaints are in relation to the same incident. In view of the fact that a case is already registered with respect to the same incident albeit on the complaint of Kaki Chandra Mahesh Mouli, the petitioner cannot have any legitimate grievance. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.5564 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 9th APRIL, 2008 kvni