IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.431-M of 2011 Date of Decision:6.1.2011 M/s A.S. Electrical and another .... Petitioners Versus M/s Naman Enterprises .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. D.K. Bhati, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the requisite pleas before the trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, in case the petitioners move an application for exemption of their personal appearance before the trial Court, the same shall be duly considered by it in accordance with law. 6.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE