IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2010 / 9TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2858 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- E.K.PRAVEEN, S/O. PRABHAKARAN, LEKSHMI NIVAS, THIRUVANGAD AMSOM, THALASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR (RR)., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (EXCISE), KANNUR 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KOOTHUPARAMBA. MS.K.R.DEEPA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.2858 of 2010 (F) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner admittedly is a defaulter to the respondents on account of the fact that he was one of the joint licensees of toddy shops during the year 1997-98. According to the petitioner, although, he made substantial payment of the defaulted amount, still excluding other defaulters, revenue recovery proceedings are continued against him. In the circumstances, he submitted Ext.P5 representation to respondents 1 & 3 requesting for initiating action against other defaulters as well. In this writ petition what he seeks is a direction for consideration of Ext.P5 representation. 2. The requisitioning authority being the 3rd respondent, it is only appropriate that Ext.P5 representation should be considered by the 3rd respondent. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P5 representation and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible on production of a copy of this WP(C) No.2858/2010 -2- judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg