1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5546 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.D.P. Palodkar Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.V.D. Rakh A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 to 4. Mr.R.T. Nagargoje Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 to 13 CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 3RD NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Palodkar submits that the Revision filed by the Petitioner which is pending before the State Government, required to be disposed of at the earliest. He further submits that for the period of six months an administrator was appointed and the said period is over. 2. In the facts of the case, we do not find that in the exercise of our extra ordinary jurisdiction, any specific 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders directions are required to be given to the State Government for disposal of the Revision within particular period of time. We expect that the State Government would deal with the Revision in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is thus disposed of. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] asb/NOV09/wp5546.09