IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 30893 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANITHA.D., AGED 40 YEARS, 'AKSHAYA SAMRABKAKA', W/O.SANTHOSH, RESIDING AT BUNGALOW HOUSE, PUTHANKULAM CHERI, POOTHAKKULAM P.O., KOLLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.G.VIDYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2. THE AKSHAYA STATE DIRECTOR, STATE OFFICE, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN-695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001. 4. THE DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICER, AKSHAYA DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE, ANDAKULAM, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001. GP SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30893 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.AKSHAYA/KLM/237/11/171 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 9.11.2011. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 12.11.2011. /true copy/ P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).30893/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 24th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is stated to be an 'Akshaya Samrabhaka' engaged in Aadhar Enrollment Works under the project UIDAI. According to the petitioner, she was appointed for the said registration in the Enrollment Stations in Chathannur and Parippally Panchayats. By Ext.P1, the fourth respondent intimated the petitioner that her registration would be cancelled. Aggrieved thereby, she approached the third respondent by filing Ext.P2. It is complaining of delay in considering Ext.P2, the writ petition was filed. 2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the registration concerning the Station at Chathannur, has been reinstated. Therefore, Petitioner has no grievance. However, insofar as Parippally Station is concerned, her grievance survives. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. Having regard to the fact that the grievance concerning Parippally Station has already been raised before the third W.P.(C).30893/11 2 respondent by filing Ext.P2, I direct the third respondent to consider the said representation, as expeditiously as possible at any rate, within three weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs /true copy/ P.A. To Judge