IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.1141 of 2010 Date of Decision:12.09.2011 Sarwan Singh .....Petitioner Vs. The Punjab State Electricity Board and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Mattewal, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an information has been sought under RTI and it has come to the notice of the petitioner that the posts Assistant Engineers under the Scheduled Caste Category have not been given their share and less candidates have been appointed whereas the quota is more. This fact has come to the knowledge of the petitioner during the pendency of this petition and replication to the written statement has been filed whereas learned counsel for the respondent No.1 has raised the objection that new facts have come on record which are not part of pleadings in the main petition. Accordingly learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with a liberty to approach the authorities concerned for his grievance. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. In case, such representation is made by the petitioner, the same be decided by the respondent- authority by passing a speaking order within C.W.P. No.1141 of 2010 -2- a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. The decision thereon be taken within a period of four weeks thereafter in accordance with law. September 12, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE