IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1203 of 2008 1. Ganesh Mistri S/o late Lal Bihari Mistri. 2. Savita Devi W/o Ganesh Mistri. 3. Deepak Kumar 4. Munna Kumar ( Both sons of Ganesh Mistri) All R/o vill. Jamunapur p.s. Gaurichak, Dist. Patna. ---Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Bihar 2. Paltan Mistri S/O late Lal Bihari Mistri R/O vill. Jamunapur, P.S.Gaurichak, Dist. Patna. --- Opp.Parties. For the Petitioners: Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, Advocate. ----------- 02 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.09.2008, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3rd, Patna in Sessions Trial no. 335 of 2008, whereby the prayer of the petitioners to discharge them from the charges punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code has been considered and rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries sustained by the injured/victim was simple in nature. Learned trial Court has found lacerated wound on the forehead and again lacerated wound on the left forearm. This is that the learned trial Court has observed: “…. At the stage of change the scope of the court is very limit one. If the court considers that there is no sufficient ground against the accused then he shall discharge the accused but if the court is of the opinion that there is a ground for presuming that the accused has committed the offence which is exclusively triable by the court then he shall frame in writing the charge against the accused….” 2 The consideration of the matter by the learned trial Court in terms of the provisions invoked cannot be faulted. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)