^ ^-^f^^^ BEFQRE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAHISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.fSlNO. SSI /200jr7 PETITION_ER „ \^^y. ^^..^s^...- ^..- .^X.-t' .-''' \""^ •••" Y(;M^-"" ..-•^:^>-' •o^ •¥>t>".,.?>* €/y. 0' RESPONDENTS 'fCf APARNA \<S 1*1 MAl^/IYA Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, son of Shri Nathuram Tiwari, aged about 45 years, working as Head Master - Middle School Sonarpara, Distt. South Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The Union of India - through the Secretar/, Karmik Lok Shikayat Tatha Pension Mantralaya, Karmik Aur Prashikshan Vibhag, New Delhi. State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Department of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Welfare, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh, through - Secretary, Deptt. Of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Welfare, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Welfare, Distt. South Bastar, (Dantewada) (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT / WRITS, ORDER / ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN FORM OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI / PROHIBITION ETC. lUBlBg.-1 ^7. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTR1. J. PeUtioner WRIT PETtTION (S.l N0.531 OF 2007 Rajendra Prasad Tiwari versus Respondents : The Union of India and others Present : Mr. Anil Tripathi, counsel for Uis petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel L^wyer for the State of Chhattisgarh/respondents No.2 and 4. ORDER :th (Passed on 25'" Day of January, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petttioner is working on the post of Head Master in Micklte School, Sonarpara, Block Geedam, District South Bastar (Dantewada) (State of ChhaUasgarh). Pursuant to his transfer from the State of ChhatUsgarh to the State of Madhya Pradesh, the peUtioner has made several representations, as stated in his application dated 8-2-2006 (Annexure P-8). No order has been passed on the representations of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner, in this petition, confines his prayer to a direction to the respondents - concerned authorittes to consider and pass an appropriate order on his representations, to which leamed 1 counsel appearing for the State of ChhaUsgarh/respondente No.2 and 4 has no objection. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of and the respondents - concemed authoriUes are directed to look into the representations of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance wth law on their own merit wtthin a period of six weeks from the receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to coste. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri . Judge Gopal