^ -> n S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETITIONfS) NOPv v ' /201L .^»,..•"•• PETITIONER: ^^•<e^S!:-" ^" ,^- ^"^ ^'•'^"' •^>M T^ Respondents ii"-1^^1 ^>. ^?7 ^S-F^ Sudhram, son ofMangla Ram, aged about 36 years, Cook, Aadivasi Kanya Ashram, Banja, Block Bhaiyathan, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Yersys l/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Conimissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3rAssistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, Chhattisgarh. 4'r^Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 5f"Block Education Officer, Block Bhaiyathan, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 'S^ ^WM^, yTll^^Ko', ?®!dl'!-llj.< ^.......U.f..a2...Z/.(.9/..(.L ^TO'n'^^W" ""'"""'""'''•"'••""^••"•'^200 'w^r Tra^ (^Gii^^) ^^[ ^T Ri^icb '^T8n 'STT^T ^^iqb ?^iw^rft^3H^r A" ltSB : Hon'ble Shri Maniadra M J22.6.2QU Shri C.J. K. Rao with petitioners. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel copy. Leamed coi-uisel for ftie relating to claim of contract^ employees came up for consid< No.2004/11 and batch of petit| of the petitioners, this Court ca.se in those cases. He submit covered by the aforesaid order. On the other hand, lear| that fhe representation of the| due verification. After goiag fhrough fhe| W.P. (S) No.2004/11, it is| petitioners is squarely covere^ the petitioners are also entifle<j Accordingly, it is direct4 representation belbre t-he con^: Sl|iri Akshay Yadav counsel tbr tlie cr)j^f<n^il ^TR^rf ^ fe^ ^^l^ '^'^fW 3TT^t haa SIirivastava. J.1 JLawyer for the State, on advaiice betitioners submits that fhe issue iial payment to Cook and other jration before this Court in W.P, (8) lons and after examining the claiin Ihad directed consideration of tlie that. fhe case of the petitioners is bed counsel for the State submits jpetitioners would be decided after order dated 15.4.2011 passed in apparent that the case of fhe by fhe aforesaid order. Therefore, to the same direction in the case. that if fhe petitioners make fresh ;emed aufhonty, cl^iinmg payment 1 o XI-HC—78 ^ 7ST ^WW^, ^Tll'H^Ko', 'f®ldl<My.< ^I^^F^W^ "^200 ^TT^T T^ (licl^<sl<t^) ^TI^T ^T f^-licb ^T^T ^TT^^RW ^RTTW ^?r ^TT^I ri> Praveea c- of minimum wages applicable | Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Ccjntract the same shall be disposed o\ period of eight weeks fro^n representation. In the event ol would be at Uberty to file writ of. With tlie aforesaid direct^on, fhe petition is finally disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge CM^F<n<A'1 ^TR^Tf ^f "fe^ <f^<^S< ^'^tRw3:i?^r |to a contract employee under fhe Appointiaent) Rules, 2004, in accordance with law.wit.hm a fhe date of submission of any adverse order, fhe petitioners etition afresh.