IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. SUIT No.21 of 1989 Maria Laura Luzia Pinto and another ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Adrian Pinto and another ..Defendants. Ms Varsha Parab i/b. S.P. Nagvekar,Advocate for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs has produced letter dated 26.11.2007 addressed to the plaintiffs, intimating them about the next date of hearing and also to seek instructions to proceed with the suit. She has also produced sealed envelopes showing postal endorsement "incomplete address". It appears that the said letter could not be served on the plaintiff for want of address. The said sealed envelopes and postal endorsement are taken on record. 2. In the result, the suit is dismissed in default with no order as to costs. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)