IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 90 of 2009 With Stay Application No. 1084/2009 Pradeep Kumar. ......... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. .......... Respondents Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration o the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R.; are averments made against the petitioner; and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any good ground to grant relief to the petitioners as claimed in the petition. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Consequently, the stay application is also dismissed. 4. However, I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioners’ case at the trial, which is yet to start. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 25.03.2009 V.K.