1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No.2191 Of 2010 DISTRICT: LATUR Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s order Coram: A.M. Khanwilkar & S.S. Shinde, JJ. Date: 10th March 2010 ----- 1) Not on Board. The matter is produced in view of urgency stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the auction of the sugar attached by the respondent – Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner & Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization is likely to take place tomorrow. By consent the matter is taken on Board. 2) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 3) The principal issues raised by the petitioner have already been answered by us in our decision dated 3rd March 2010 in Writ Petition No.1237 of 2010. Following the same reasons we do not intend to interfere even in the present petition. According to the counsel for the petitioner, the respondent – Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization has not followed proper procedure for auction. In that, whether such auction could be proceeded with contrary to the Sugar (Control) Order, even these aspects have been dealt with in our above said decision. As aforesaid, for the same reasons this petition is devoid of merits. The same is therefore dismissed. (S.S. SHINDE,J.)(A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rsl/ wp.2191.10