IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21087 of 1999 Between: Ahmed Razaq S/o. Hussian Razaq R/o.Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep.by its Managing Director, Musheerbad , Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager , A.P.S.R.T.C., Karimnagar Region, Karimnagar District. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Karimnagar -2 Depot, Karimngar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent not regularising the service from the date of the initial appointment i.e., 24-1- 92 and canceling regularisation from 17-8-92 in proceedings No.E2/145(17)/92-DVM-KRMR DT 17-8-92 and regularising w.e.f.1-8-94 and also recovering the excess payments made towards salary from 17- 8-92 to 31-7-94 in proceedings No.P2/255(7)/97 -RM-KM dt 20-4-99 by the 2nd Respondent and recovering the amount rs.28,467 -15 Ps @ Rs.500/- per month vide proceeding no.P1/255(1)/99-KR-II dt 31-8-99 of the 3 rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of Natural Justice and contrary to the law W.A.No.705/95 dt 24-7-95 consequently direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner from the date of initial appointment i.e.,24-1-92and grant the consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.A.K.MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.P.RAJANI REDDY (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No. 21087 of 1999 Order: This writ petition was listed for hearing on 19th January 2009. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 19th January 2009, it is posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Although the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, even today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 20.01.2009 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Rep by its Chairman Cum Presiding Officer, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 2 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C. Korutla Depot, Karimnagar District. 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK}