^^'^ CF \-zr^^ W»P.(S)No»S^o^ /2009 / Jankidevi W/o Vasudeo Verma, Age about'49 years, R/o Thakkar Baba KanyaAashram, District- Narayanpur (C.G.) VERSUS l..^h '..•''•;'<v\v.--" ^.^^%- ./^^••••v' State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretaiy, .Scheduled Ca^te, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. /The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur(C.G) 3. - The Secretary, MataRukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tali. & Dis^rict-Jagdalpur (C.G.) CONSTFTUTION HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETITION (S) No. 5306 of2009 PETITIONER RE8PO^TDENTS Jankidevi. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri S.P.Kale.Advocateforthepetitioner. Shi'i P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 & 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 17th day of September, 2009) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered in Smt A.Lall v. State ofChhaffisgarh & Others}, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decision- subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 34nstitute is a Govenmient Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the State submits that mthe event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered aiid decided, in accordance v^ith law, within a period offour weeks Irom tiie date ofreceipt of the representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. g^ SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Aixiit 1 2007 (l)BLJ 265