IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.549 of 2008 BHARAT PANDEY ……Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BASAWAN MAHTO 3. MUNNI LAL MAHTO 4. KRISHNA MAHTO 5. BASUKI NATH MAHTO 6. JYOTI PRAKASH MAHTO 7. RADHE SHYAM MAHTO ….. Opposite parties. ----------- 2. 04.12.2008. This Cr. Revision has been preferred against the order of acquittal dated 6.5.2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Buxar in Sessions Trial No. 350 of 2006. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that after acquittal the opposite parties are threatening. However, on perusal of the impugned order it appears that in course of the trial most of the witnesses turned hostile. Judgment is based on compromise arrived at between the parties. Under the facts and circumstances, on the above submission I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order of acquittal. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)