cp448.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 448 OF 2010 Amolaksingh s/o Gurbaxsing ...Petitioner Versus Samadalikhan s/o Vijaytalikhan ...Respondent ..... Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.V. Mandlik, senior counsel h/f Mr. A.S. Gandhi, advocate for respondent. ..... CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATED: 28TH MARCH, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The respondent has caused his appearance and tendered affidavit in reply. In the said affidavit in reply, the respondent has tendered unconditional apology for the lapse committed by him in his failure to observe strictly the directions issued by this court. It is also stated in the affidavit in reply that possession of the disputed premises has been handed over to the petitioner. Counsel appearing for the petitioner also does not dispute the contentions noted in the affidavit in reply that the possession of the suit premises has been handed over to cp448.10 -2- his client. 2 In this view of the matter and considering the fact that the respondent has tendered unconditional apology for the lapse committed by him, which has been accepted by this court, the instant contempt petition needs to be disposed of and the same is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ( R.M. BORDE. J.) rlj/