IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14051 of 2009 RAMA SHANKAR THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.14171 of 2009 UMESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of Complaint Case No. 630© of 2008, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the consigned goods were delivered from Patna Branch to which petitioners concerned received by Kolkata Branch. Information is there from that all articles were misplaced while in course of transaction. If there was any misdeed then also it was act of Kolkata Branch even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in - 2 - Complaint Case No. 630© of 2008, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Md. Habibullah, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI