IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.866 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 18, 2010 Karam Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This revision petition has been filed in challenge to conviction and sentence of the petitioner as confirmed by the Lower Appellate Court vide Judgment dated 6.2.2010. Rash and negligent driving of the petitioner caused eight deaths in an accident wherefor he was tried for commission of offence under Section 304-A IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised only one argument viz. brakes of the vehicle had failed. In this regard, reliance has been placed on report Mark `X’. Crl. Revision No.866 of 2010 [2] Learned counsel admits that the document was never proved under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Learned counsel has not been able to show as to under what circumstances in law, report can be considered for adjudication of the issue. PW-18, Head Constable Piara Singh proved the test report (Exh.PW-18/A) and testified that after mechanically testing the vehicle, it was found that brakes and steering system of the vehicle were found correct and in working condition. In view of the above, no ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) March 18, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?