IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnS3ARH AT BILASPUR VAit Petitioti No.'z'2-e-2-/2003 (y^ D•ETmONER RESPONDENT5 Uuiiv pTasad Gupta, S/o Choabha RainGupta, Aged about 55 years, Woriang as .^Bistant Developaiie'nt Erf.ension Qtfi.cer, Sarganv, Fafharia, .Mungeli, R/o Vlttage- HakimNagar, Sarganv, Mungeli, Bilasptir (CG.) Versus- 1. State of Chhattissari-i, Through.Secretaiy DeparttMeint Oi PandMyat and Gramhi V&as, Mantralaya, Shasfa-i Chowk, Raipur(CG) 2. Janpad Fanchayat pandria, Through Chief EKecuti.ve Officer, (CG.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMU8, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC, OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. Tt_^.-^1- -^ ^.-L EliilMi ^l >1 11! •wwisi !ltr:t. It*-; atSSR'*I lil'.'i! Ifl-tlgBj^g^I :!»*<t'*"B SK : 1 'S^ -wwif STilwie, Iqciray *n*tCTi «>*«<» ^yr tR?R ; , ......^..^&l^ 200 R(<><isT' ^T^^flrt^T ^if^fl 18-8-20Q® coun<e Shri ProshanfJaiswal; Shri Saryay |K. ^ravKal, respondent No.l. ; By;rtiis fetrtwn fiied Constitutien of InUia' the petiti order aatec! 24-7-2003; Anne: transferred from; his present ]: Jdnpad Ranchayat Kontd, bistrii working 'as Assistont Deyeioi forthe petitioner. (leputy Adyocate (Seneral for the (inder ^rticle 226/227 of tfte loner hois challenoeel his +ransTer cur-P/l by which he has been }lace of posting qt Sanangany to ^t &antewada. Tne petitioner is . Extenston Officer in the thfei arld PrashantlTuiswa 'Rie 'main^rievance of •(•rarisferrsd in tli? fnid-session only four yeqr's are lesft In his haya been transferred. I have henrd Shri In para 5.4 i»'f1+lie petitiori working af SdrgHgtay sirice 1985 lace arid now 'fie llias ;heen trtM'l ":l i". ' . •^1 •:".••'.•• • •". ^;.-:1 •!'••'' '; ;:' '•••''• '. '. ;'-'i Panchayat Konta E?[3fric|'Eiorrtedaj There is nd such rute etnployee when heijs ofeouT to wlki <tiliilf<n<()*1 *tl*i^ ^^N^ ^<$K ^; aiBtPisn^i th^ petitiBner is +hat he hiis been, dt ths fag end of his careSr dhdi r^-'iremenf, therefore, he should not I, sounsel for ths petjtioner. lit is dtated that the petitioner was ^ •e. mar®thon last 18 years at one j sfepred from Sarcm|gay to: .lahpdd | va.. . ' . . ,: l . : \ • (icK proltibits the tronsfer of wj j^ r^t-ire wittiin foyr yeqrs. TriansNr's :a' %1: :BI i.lli'.l: •^yvSSs^'^t!^" "^•'•^'s'' :»» KP ^x:'"y !lg ^s^^wjgillwSpssglE^i^N WiSSt' .SSi\i ;-*(RK'>r'aisn<;BW'~""'""""""~""'"''""?^- 200 1 ^n^^/ itisttlW [||;|giflHt!aftf are made on aclministrative petitioner is able to make out transfer of the petitioner is the Court can iiotinterfiSre with is not enTitled to exerci^ the ttie transfep orders. As mentioheBl ubove, -rtie transfer has besn miade dgainst been •rnmsferred on mdld-fide gi in this caa; tiie same 'is liable to exiQencies mslctfide pqwers K 'BllIfl'fll tlwif^W'^lRlKSK ^ <RNn 3ii%!ii , and unless and until the •the case which shows 1+iaf the Qr aaainst any statutory rules, the transfer orders and the Court ws.rs of the judicial review ageinst betitioner has not stated that his |uiy statutory proyisions, or he has r4unds. Therefore/there is no merit dismissed ond it is disniissed. Jl_^ Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge' s ':w i3-