THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.9612 OF 2000 Between: Shaik Khasim Pera, Guntur District. …………..Petitioner Vs. 1) The Mandal Revenue Officer, Guntur District and three others ……………..Respondents. THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.9612 OF 2000 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged action of the first respondent in seeking to dispossess the petitioner from the house plot in question highhandedly alleging that the said plot forms part of excess vacant land of the petitioner’s vendor. It is pleaded that the allegation that it forms part of the excess vacant land itself is factually incorrect and at any rate, the impugned action of the respondents in attempting him to dispossess him without giving him an opportunity to make his representation against the proposed action is arbitrary, illegal and violative of the principles of natural justice. Though Rule Nisi was ordered by this Court on 08.06.2000, no counter affidavit has been filed by any of the respondents so far. Interim stay of dispossession granted by this Court on 08.06.2000 continued to be in operation all through. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in the absence of any counter affidavit, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the house plot in question in any manner whatsoever without following due process of law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. __________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.13.09.2007 tjs