BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14857 of 2011 THALAPATHI : PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVERUMBUR TOWN POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.738 OF 2011) : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A2 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.10.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 8(C) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.738 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. Heard Mr.B.Jameel Arasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has no previous case and hence, he seeks bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that as far as this petitioner is concerned there is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ no previous case and the possession of ganja with the petitioner was below the commercial quantity and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, stringent condition may be imposed. 5. Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner has no previous case, this Court is inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner with stringent condition. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily twice at 10.30 a.m & 5.30 p.m until further orders. Sd/- 29/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.6, TRICHY. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVERUMBUR TOWN POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. +1 CC to M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.41979 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14857 of 2011 Date :29/11/2011 NSV/30.11.11/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/