.^••-"^''^^y^^ ^,""-^.^- ys»*" ^..••••"" , ,*34-""~ ^ ^t ^ ;^-. «»THE HIGH 60URT OF ^yOtCATyRe, A^ W^SPORfae.} wprr prnriQN ^.'z-'^^js peTrrtONER ii,A^ed Styeais S/0 AWul MuNn,R/o<RaJ9 Tateb Distt.-fteipur.CG. VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^.StateQTCG.SlttHghSeflt^ary, Department ofPubtjc tnstrycttotts, Ettucation} O.K.S.Bhawan, Ftaipvr,Distt.Raipur C6 <^t' •'•-J ./' .<":.,/ (W ^'s ^Wfeetor. PMe tnsfructjons {Educaton} ^. Ofett>tt8tpur(C<3) ^^i "^ A v- ^" ^'oepyty Director, y^,x'\ Qv " PuyteinstruetionslEdutiation} ^' OJStt.SalpUr(C6) ^&istrict Educstion QfiHcer Oepartttient of sclioo) 6dyi»t(on Ofett.~Ra»pur,C©, ^<^' wmi pewiowi U?A- 226 OF CQNSTiTuirtON OP <NtSM m !S' E~ ;. !;' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUI (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Hli Writ Petition (S) No. 2713 of 2007 PETITIONER AfjalAaj'ami VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of C.G. and others Shri Ravish Verma counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai PL PL for the respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrrLmONOFlNDIA ORDER (20.09.2010) Counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently the pet'tioner could not challenge the order dated 5.8.2006 (Annexur^i ]R-1) and therefore he may be permifted to withdraw fhis pstition w|fj •'.[••' liberty to file a we!l constituted petition challenging the said ordijj^' also. 2. 3Permission sought for is granted and accordingly the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker y'fl.K Judge ";',(•'?••: •^^s; II