IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.25349-M of 2010 Date of Decision:13.10.2010 Vinod Dhiman .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.303 dated 12.8.2010 registered under Sections 136 & 137 of the Electricity Act and under Sections 380 and 409 of IPC at Police Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Suresh Kumar states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, order dated 31.8.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 13.10.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE