1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 1353/2008 (Sanjana Raju Mankani VERSUS Raju Arjundas Mankani) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Smt. I.C. D'cruz., counsel for the applicant. Shri A.H. Laddhad, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 9, 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the applicant sought the transfer of the Hindu Marriage Petition No.796/2008 filed by the non-applicant before the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Nagpur. Shri Laddhad, the learned counsel for the non-applicant, makes a statement that the non- applicant has withdrawn the Hindu Marriage Petition for restitution of conjugal rights and, hence, the cause of action in this miscellaneous civil application does not survive. 2 In view of the statement made on behalf of the non-applicant, it appears that the cause of action in this miscellaneous civil application would not survive. The miscellaneous civil application is, therefore, disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE