IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2008 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 36540 of 2007(Y) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------------- P.G.MATHEW, MARANGATTU HOUSE, PERUNNA P.O., CHANGANASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.36540/2007 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 09/02/2007 ISSUED BY THE RTA., IDUKKI. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 31/07/2007 IN M.V.A.A. NO.194/2007 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE STAT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B/5283/05/ID DTD. 22/11/2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 36540 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT Conversion of permit was applied for by the petitioner and that was granted by Ext.P1, subject to a condition, not to alter the starting time. Against this condition, petitioner preferred an appeal and that was allowed by Ext.P2. Subsequently, timing also has been settled as per Ext.P3. 2. The prayer in this Writ Petition is that the conversion of permit granted by Ext.P1 has not been endorsed by the RTA and therefore appropriate direction should be issued. In view of Exts.P1 to P3 and in view of the conversion of the permit that is allowed, there is no justification for not endorsing the same. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing that the respondents shall make necessary endorsement in implementation of Exts. P1 to P3. This shall be done within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ttb WPC No. 6246 OF 2008 2 WPC No. 6246 OF 2008 3