IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 13585 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Surinder Singh and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioners have already made a representation for the redressal of their grievances on the basis of Annexure A-3, dated 08.02.2006. However, the same has not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary of the respondent-Board to decide the representation made by the petitioners strictly in view of Annexure A-3, dated 08.02.2006 by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. It is made clear that in the eventuality of the representation being decided in favour of the petitioners, they shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `