PETITXCNER 8 '^ ISyORE THE HISB COURT OF JBDXC&TURE AT JABM,PUR< W.P.HO. L{^(^ ^ /93 "Y . . • .-....- lo Branha Deo Stoanaa, aged 68 yrs, S/o Late Pt. RttnJBiharilal, Foraer Coiamlssioaer for Seheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribess G®vt»o£ India Presently, President of Bharat iTaa Xndolan, R/o Village Maulibhata, P«G»DJlliaili^iistt. Bastaro 2« Viehnu Prabhakar, aged 25 yrss S/o Shri Ghaitram Dhryv » R/o Bagrunnala(lawachipara) , Post Keregaon, PaScSirjunl, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (MP) rf V/S RESPONDENTS; ^v: 1» The ttaion o£ Indiap through the Secretary, Ministry of Bural Development Deptt «, New Delhi. . 2. The Dlrecfeor, (E.A.S:,) , eovt<>o£ India, Minlstry o£ Raral DeveloEuient» - Krlshi Bhawan, New Belhio 3« The State of M.P.s throagh the Chief Secretarya Maatralaya , Bhopal, 4» The Secretary, Govt« of M.P. Rural Develo^ansnt DeE>tt<,c •llantralaya • Bhopalo 5 o Vhe Colleetor, Raiixir WRXT FETITION UN3ER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITDTIOW OF IHDIA. Q& v.^.. \ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURECHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH 9(J Wln CORAM: HON'BLE SHRIH.L. DATTU.CJ & HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. WRIT^PETITLQNNO. 4262 OF 1999 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Bramha Deo Sharma, aged 68 years, S/o Late Pt. Kunj Biharital, Former pommissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduted Tribes, Govt. of India, Presently R/6 Bharat Jan Andolan, R/o Village Mauiibhata, P.0. Ditimill, Distt. Bastar. Vishnu Prabhakar, aged 25 years, • S/o Shri Chaifram Dhruv, R/o Bagrumnala (Kawachipara) Post Keregaon, P.S. Sirjuni, Tah. Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari. Versus 1. The Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development Deptt., New Delhi. 2. The Director, (E.A.S.)., Govt. of India, Ministry of Rural Development, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. The State of M.P., through the Chief Secretary, h/lantralaya, Bhopal. 4. The Secretary, Govt. of M.P. Rural Development Deptt., Mantralaya, Bhopal. 5. The Collector, Raipur. Present:- Noneforthe petitioners. ORALORDER (Passed on 26tn March, 2007) n •%-• ,..'.^<^..-.._ IBH The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L. Dattu, CJ. When the matter was calted for hearing nons.appeared nor any representation was made on behatf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in the matter. Therefore, the petition is rejected for non-prosecution. Orderedaccordingiy. Sd/- ChiefJustice ; '', '•^ - Sd//- V.K-Shrivastava Judge ss T g§»"\ '%.V- ^r.--/-' •^