IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.5 of 1996 Between: A. Rami Reddy S/o. Konda Reddy r/o. Anantapur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Anantapur Municipality, Anantapur. 2 D. Subba Naidu S/o. Narayana D.No. 12/320 E4, Vidhyuth Nagar, Anantapur. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur. (Writ Petition is dismissed as against R2 for default as per court order dt.22-3-2000) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Roc.No.5166/95-G2, dated 26-12-1995 as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the first respondent not to interfere with the drain going through the Government land situated in between the plots belonging to the petitioner and the second respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.K.M.MAHENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : None appeared Counsel for the Respondent NO. 3 : The Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that there are no instructions from his client. Having regard to the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 08.11.2004 Nsr To 1 The Commissioner, Anantapur Municipality, Anantapur. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur. 3.. 2 CCs to the Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4 Two CD copies.