IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.28881-M of 2010 Date of Decision:11.11.2010 Harjinder Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Paul, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.9 dated 22.5.2010 registered under Sections 307,498-A,120-B IPC at Police Station Satnampura, Phagwara, District Kapurthala. It is contended that as per the allegation in the FIR, the entire role is attributed to brother-in-law, mother-in-law and father-in-law. Whereas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions states that all the aforesaid persons have been found innocent and the challan has only been filed against the present petitioner. Thus, the entire prosecution story has been rendered doubtful at this stage. The petitioner is in custody since 1.7.2010. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapurthala. 11.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE