IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.111 of 2010 Smt.Latika Kumari w/o late Sep/ N.A. Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, Village & Post – Mahendrapura, P.S. – Nayagaon, District – Begusarai ……… Appellant Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Major Company Commandant, Lucknow -2 2. Army Medical Corps. Centre and School, Lucknow through the Captain cum Administrative Officer 3. Army Medical Corps. Record ( N.E.Group) Lucknow -2 through the Captain cum Administrative Officer, ……… Respondents ----------- For the appellant: Mr. R.K. Ranjan, Advocate --- 2 22/1/2010 This is an application for condonation of delay of 280 days in preferring the appeal. Before adverting to the issue of notice on the question of delay, we thought it apt to dwell upon the merits of the appeal. On a perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge passed in CWJC. No.6578 of 2006 on 10.2.2009, it is evident that he has declined to interfere with the refusal of the army authorities for extending the benefit of compassionate appointment on the ground that her husband had breathed his last on 10.11.1994 and the application for compassionate appointment was preferred in 2006. Be it noted, though the learned Single 2 Judge has taken note of certain other facts, we are only restricting ourselves the question of delay and on that ground we concur with the view of the learned Single Judge. If the appellant is aggrieved by any other action of the army authorities, it is open to her to assail the same within the parameters of law . In view of aforesaid, there is no justification to issue notice on the question of limitation and accordingly the delay application for limitation stands rejected and as a logical corollary the appeal also stands dismissed. Neyaz/ (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)