IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3595 OF 2000 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3595 OF 2000 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3595 OF 2000 IN IN IN MISC.PETITION NO.91 OF 2000 MISC.PETITION NO.91 OF 2000 MISC.PETITION NO.91 OF 2000 Dinshaw Framroze Pocha & Ors. ..Petitioners versus Homi Nusservanji Jamshedji Dady & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Zubin Behram Kamdin with Mr. Vivek Vashi i/b. M/s. Amarchand & Mangaldas & S.A.Shroff & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.A.Y.Bookwala with Mr. Swapnil Desai i/b. M/s. Little & Co. for the Respondent No.1. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 22nd Dec., 2005 Dated : 22nd Dec., 2005 Dated : 22nd Dec., 2005 P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the Petitioner as well as the learned Advocate for Respondent No.1. 2. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the main consent terms are already filed earlier on 6.7.2005 and now they are filing supplementary consent terms. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted at bar that so far as the other respondents are concerned they are formal and no relief is sought against them. 3. Supplementary Minutes taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 4. Parties to act on the ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate of this Court. (S.R.Sathe, J.)