i W 'mE HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONNO. /^/. 6/2005 PETITIONER •^^ RESPONDENTS -r.^ ^'^.^ '^ ^''^:: 'V^. ' i>-;--.. '^\ v^- f^ '> ^-.^-[\- .,^ < ^'<1'-^ ,?' Dr. Mayur Patel, S/o. Shri J.B. Patel, Aged about 30 years, Bachelor of Dental Surgery (B.D.S.) R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Controller, Public Service CQmmission, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, (Examination) Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF_IND!A FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WmT_O^UKE NATURE XI-HC-22 3^T '<iNi<n-4, ^Tft^l(g, fs)dl^^< 3i|^| ^5<c»» , W^T13KV^ f" ^ 200^ 3TI^T^)T ^i<=h3^r ^^icb^?T 3TI^T?^T^K^rf5cT 27-4-2005 tHat Mr/Kishore Bhadun, Mr* Abhishek Sinha, Standin< Heard both the counsel The mdn grievance raised that he is the holder of Degree of respondents in the month of Mar< VGcancies for the post of Profe| Professor, and the quaiification for| Dental Surgery* In pursuance of applied under the impression thaf' reguiations, a person simply holdin^ above said posts, However, later corrigendum was issued by the appiicotions aiready received will Lecturer, but the said corrigendu^ therefore, he could not appiy, Learned counsel for the pe^ B,D<S. degree holder and the respt April, 2005, for selection to the In the cjrcumstances, the for the petitioner is that the chl<4?<rt41Tl ^l^<rlT^:tel:^t<f^^l< ^3ti^T3TT^ST counsel ^for the petitioner* Counsei for the re^pondents. fc(y the petitioner in this writ petition is |achelor Science in Dentai Surgery* The jh, 2004, vide Annexure P-1/advertised Fe^sor, Associate Professor & Assistant the said posts was fixed as Bachelor of advert'isement,the petitioner had not as per the Dentai Councii of India's a B*D,S degree Is not entitled for the [?n, vide notification dated 15-10-2004 a re^pondents and it was published that the |be treated for the posts of Reader & could not be noticed by the petitioner, 1-itioner submits that the petitioner is a sndents are conducting interview on 29 po|st$ of Reader & Lecturer, Smited request made by iearned counse! petitioner may be aitowed to make a XI-HC-22 ^(^1^1 »)^1<^ 3F5? ^tNlcrt^, ^Tf1^^<5, fs|€rlW^< ...y.^.(6(o/..^ ^ fd<b<^ 3T[^TcFT f^TT^3:n^T ^W^^fgcT ^.^ Soma 3TI^T ?^<[T^K ^Tf^cT 2-+- ^xl representation to respondent Nol counset for the respondents has 4 Learned counse! for thel though the petitioner is Qlread^ appfied, but if the petitioner is he has no objection. Having heard iearned coun^ the facts and circumstances of circumstances to ailow the pe-t respondent No.2 today itself,an<p decide the ^sme on its own meriN With the direction aforesal Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.No|. 3101/2005 alsostand disposed ofj. Certified copy today. chl^I^^l^ ^I^^Tt'^:tel:^'<f^<-<-K ^3Tf^T3TT^T 2 to consider his case, to which learned o objection. respondents submits that the even havin9 a B.D.S. degree, he had not llowed to make a representation, then ?el for the parties and having regard to the case, it is just and proper in the itioner to make a representation to respondent No.2 shali consider it and L Ordered accordingly. id, the petition stands disposed of. .1250/2005, I.A.Nos.3100/2005 and Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (lft^^fe^r) llA-i'vc <^r '^