HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.7777 of 2009 Dated : 24.09.2009 Between : M/s.Cybermate Infotek Limited and others ….. Petitioners a n d The State of A.P. ….. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition No.7777 of 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri R.Venkat Rao, learned counsel representing Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri A.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the sole respondent. The petitioners claim that they were out of country for sometime and that on 27.10.2008 they could not attend the Court, as it was holiday for the Court. The non-bailable warrants were claimed to have been issued on the next day on 28.10.2008. The very docket proceeding shows that the matter was called on the next working day as 27th and 28th of October, 2008, happened to be public holidays and fresh non-bailable warrants were issued against the petitioners. Irrespective of the past history of the case, in view of the fact that the case is to be tried as a summons case and the petitioners are ready to submit themselves to the judicial process, under circumstances indicating that there is no deliberate avoidance of process of law by the petitioners, the non-bailable warrants can be recalled. Accordingly, the non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioners in C.C.No.427 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, are recalled and the petitioners shall appear before the said Court within fifteen (15) days from today and submit themselves to the judicial process in C.C.No.427 of 2006. On such appearance, the said Court may obtain appropriate personal bonds from the petitioners for their future appearance with or without sureties, for such amount as deemed fit, in exercise of the judicial discretion of the said Court. In default of appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court within fifteen (15) days, the trial Court may issue compulsive process to secure their presence before the Court. The criminal petition is ordered accordingly. ______________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J 24th September, 2009 SUR