IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5677 of 2009 PRAMOD YADAV SON OF TARANAND YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- FARHI, P.S.-NARPATGANJ, DISTRICT- ARARIA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 18-02-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is seen to be one of the named accused persons, who are villagers of the informant and according to the learned counsel there were political differences and land dispute between both the families. Taking that into consideration, petitioner’s involvement would be doubted, but in the case, first act of dacoity was firing, injuring the informant and thereafter any act of robbing was done. So, I find that it is not a fit case for bail taking into consideration the petitioner’s custody. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of Narpatganj P.S.Case No.48/08. A.H/ (Mandhata Singh, J.)