IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14417 of 2011 1. Shivnath Pandey S/O Late Deosharan Pandey R/O Vill.-Bhatkhan Khem, Panchayat-Narendra Pur, P.S.-Ander, Block-Andar, Distt.- Siwan. 2. Ramnath Singh S/O Late Ramcheese Singh R/O Vill.-Bhikpur, Panchayat-Bharauli, P.S.-Ander, Block-Ander, Distt.-Siwan. 3. Tnspector Yadav S/O Late Kapil Deo Yadav R/O Vill.-Masudaha, Panchayat-Bhawrajpur, P.S.-Ander, Block-Ander, Distt.-Siwan. 4. Awadh Kishore Yadav S/O Sri Nathuni Yadav R/O Vill.-Sultanpur, Panchayat-Ander, P.S.-Ander, Block-Ander, Distt.-Siwan. 5. Yogendra Pandit S/O Late Nag Pandit R/O Vill.-Jamalpur, Panchayat- Jamalpur, P.S.-Ander, Block-Ander, Distt.-Siwan. 6. Surendra Prasad Sah S/O Late Mahabir Prasad R/O Vill.-Singhi, Panchayat-Garar, P.S.-Ander, Block-Ander, Distt.-Siwan. 7. Kanhiya Yadav S/O Late Shivanandan Yadav R/O Vill.-Sanjal Pur, Panchayat-M. Bhathan, P.S.-Ander, Block-Ander, Distt.-Siwan. . . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Siwan. 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner (DDC), Siwan. 6. The Block Development Officer, Andher, Siwan. 7. The Officer-In-Charge Asawan, P.S. in the District of Siwan. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 08.09.2011 A Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of petitioners. The petitioners are P.D.S. dealer within Andher Block in the district of Siwan. The petitioners submit that they have distributed all the rice that were allotted to them under SGRY Scheme save and except petitioner no.1. Learned counsel submits that even petitioner no.1 has distributed all the rice save and except 10 quintals. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners file a representation before the Block Development Officer, Andher, Siwan raising their grievances, the 2 same would be disposed of expeditiously as possible. Till then, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioners. Petitioner no.1 would deposit 50 % of 10 quintals of the value of rice at the rate of 10/- per Kg. or the rice in the present form within six weeks from today. I have not expressed any opinion regarding the quantity of rice remaining undistributed. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)