IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32258 of 2009 Deepa Mahto, Son of Bharosa Mahto, resident of Village-Dayal Chak, P.S.- Doriganj, District-Saran at Chapra. ………….Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 05.11.2009 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the first paragraph of the anticipatory bail application. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is named as accused in Doriganj P.S. Case No. 80/05 instituted for offence under Section 304 (B)/34 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner was earlier rejected in 2006. After three years, again it has been renewed, stating that warrant of arrest has been issued now and earlier there was no warrant of arrest for offence under Section 304(B). There is no necessity for issuance of warrant of arrest. I do not feel that petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. He may surrender in the court below and merit of this case will be considered by the court below on his surrender. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)