IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32893 of 2011 1.Sk. Nesar, Son of Jehal. 2.Sk. Jhoasi, Son of Sk. Dildar. 3.Sk. Intkhab, Son of Sk. Abdul Bari. 4.Sk. Kaish, Son of Azad. 5.Rustam Sheikh, Son of Bari Sheikh. 6.Jahangir, Son of Sk. Makshud. 7.Sk. Slam, Son of Osiar. 8.Sk. Tabrej, Son of Jehal. 9.Sk. Jalaluddin @ Jajluddin, Son of Late Hifajat. 10.Md. Faiz, Son of Sk. Nesar. 11.Md. Kaish, Son of Nek Mohammad. 12.Sk. Aurangjeb @ Sk. Auranjeb, Son of Jehal. All residents of Village Bherihari, P.S. Purushottampur. 13.Sk. Frakul, Son of Late Karamat. Resident of Village Sanrauwa Dhala. 14.Mir Hassan, Son of Sattar Dewan. Resident of Village Laxmipur. All of P.S. Purushottampur, District West-Champaran. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ------------- 02/- 19/10/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the fourteen petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 144, 353, 224, 225, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case causing obstruction in the official discharge of the duty by informant to apprehend petitioner nos. 1 and 10 required in another case. Submission is that these two petitioners have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail is said case also and in fact it is the prosecution side, which obstructed the meeting of Panchayat under headship of wife of petitioner no. 1, who is local Mukhiya and she has also been granted the privilege. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West-Champaran, in connection with Purushottampur P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till disposal of the case, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)