1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 738/2007 Prakash Laxmandas Damwani ..vs.. Kishor Chuharmal Jaikalyani -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 26 th February, 2008 1. Heard Mr. Anthony, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The trial Court by order dated 24.03.2006 allowed the respondent's application and directed the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs. 40,000/- in the Court on or before 25.04.2006. The petitioner is further directed to deposit each months rent at Rs. 8,000/- on 10th of each month in the Court till the decision of the suit. This order of the trial Court was challenged by the petitioner before lower appellate Court and by the impugned order, the lower appellate Court dismissed the petitioner's revision. 3. Mr. Anthony, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has denied the ownership of the respondent and, therefore, he could not have been asked to deposit 2 amount towards the arrears of rent. However, in my opinion, the amount directed to be deposited will remain in Court and if the petitioner succeeds, he will get back the amount already deposited. The examination-in-chief of the plaintiff/respondent is already over and the suit is at the stage of final disposal. 4. In that view of the matter, I do not find any propriety in interfering in the order of the trial Court which is confirmed in the revision by the lower Appellate Court. The petition can be disposed of with direction to the trial Court to dispose of the respondent's suit as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE kahale