IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.1013 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.2.2010 Sham Sunder. -----Appellant Vs. State of Punjab & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present:- Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate for the appellant. ----- ORDER: 1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment of learned Single Judge, allowing the writ petition to the extent of directing the District Administration to determine whether there is any encroachment, as alleged by the appellant and if any encroachment was found, to take action in accordance with law. 2. Only contention which has now been raised is that in the course of removing encroachments, boundary wall of the appellant has been demolished, to reconstruct the appellant should be provided police help. 3. We do not find any merit in the contention raised. LPA No.1013 of 2009 4. Going into this matter would require deciding questions of fact, for which writ Court is not the proper forum. Direction to the District Administration has already been given and the remedy of the appellant is either to move the District Administration or to approach the Civil Court. Dismissed. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE February 10, 2010 ( ALOK SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 2