IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13753 of 2008 Between: K. Mallikarjuna … Petitioner And Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Miss. G. Sree Chandra for Smt. N. Shoba Counsel for respondents 1-4: AGP for Prohibition & Excise Counsel for respondent No.5: Ms. V. Himabindu The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13753 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notification Rc.No.B/333/2008, dated 06.06.2008 in not mentioning the wards in the column area/locality for serial No.106, Chennur Mandal (Chennur-I, II and III) and in proceeding to grant licence Form A-4 to respondent No.6 for Chennur III at Ward No.12 when it is previously notified for Ward No.7, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and contrary to Rule 5(2) and Rule 27 of Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right of Selling by shop and conditions of Licence) Rules, 2005.” At the hearing, Miss. G. Sree Chandra representing Smt. N.Shoba, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.17755 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 31.08.2010. ES