1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MCA No. 967 of 2007 Harish v. MSEDCL and anr Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Shyam Dewani, Adv for applicant Mr R.K. Deshpande, Adv for respdts Coram: A.P. Deshpande and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 8th January 2008 By this application, the petitioner is seeking review of an order passed by this Court on 17th September 2007. The ground for review is that the impugned order does not consider prayer clause (a) and proceeds to dispose of the writ petition in relation to only the alternative prayer made. It is revealed that the applicant did not press prayer clause (a) when the matter was argued and hence, the said prayer has not been considered while disposing of the writ petition. If a ground or prayer is not pressed in service in a petition, the petitioner then cannot be permitted to agitate the said ground or the prayer by filing review application. In this view of 2 the matter, as there is no merit in the present application, the same is rejected. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant points out that after deposit of 50% of the amount claimed by the respondent, the electric supply came to be restored. It is, thus, prayed that status-quo as of today be continued for a period of four weeks so as to enable the applicant to take appropriate steps in the matter. Prayer made is reasonable and thus granted. Judge. Judge. hsj