IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13161 of 2010 S.P. @ WASIR AHMAD @ WASIR MIAN SON OF SHARIF MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.4.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that on the confessional statement of the co-accused, the petitioner’s name transpired, upon which the house of the petitioner was searched, from where Rs.56,000/- was recovered, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the fact that only official witnesses are required to be examined. For this reason, Section 66 Cr.P.C. may be pressed into service so that there is no unnecessary delay in examination of the official witnesses. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )