IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2222 of 2011 SHAMBHU KESHARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 182 of 2010 registered under Sections 341,323,448,365,504/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he accompanied Umesh Prasad to bring back Monu Kumar from his house who being a domestic help to Umesh Prasad’s house committed theft. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is nothing specific against the petitioner and dispute was between Umesh Prasad and the victim Monu Kumar. It is also submitted that Umesh Prasad has been granted regular bail by this Court whereas other accused Munna Chaudhary has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below. Though this Court is not inclined to interfere but considering the accusation and the fact that Munna Chaudhary has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned - 2 - court below, it is a fit case for grant of regular bail. Let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today when the learned court below will consider the regular bail application of the petitioner considering the fact that other accused has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge and dispose off the regular bail application in the light of the observations made above preferably on the same day, if possible. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)