C.W.P. No.14577 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14582 of 2011 Date of Decision.10.08.2011 M/s S.S. Auto Parts, B-50, Textile Colony, Industrial Area, Ludhiana through proprietor .....Petitioner Versus M/s Canara Bank Limited a body corporate & Nationalized Bank under the provisions of the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertaking Act, 1970, with its head office at 112, J.C. Road, Bangalore through SSI Branch, Cheema Chowk Ludhiana Punjab and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is aggrieved against the recovery certificate, which has been issued and the subsequent action that is being prosecuted by the decree holder. The petitioner's contention is that he had to remain ex parte and an order came to be passed by the DRT only because of his absence due to some personal mishap in the family. The petitioner shall have remedy either to approach the DRT for setting aside the order that has been passed or he may prefer to the DRAT under Section 20 of the RBD Act. The petitioner cannot seek for adjudication before this Court that the amount payable by him is less than what is sought to be now enforced. 2. The petitioner will have a remedy in the manner aforesaid and C.W.P. No.14577 of 2011 -2- the intervention sought through the writ petition cannot be entertained. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. 3. A copy of the order be given to the counsel for the petitioner dasti on payment of usual charges. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 10, 2011 Pankaj*