IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-4 of 2009 Date of decision : 06.05.2009 Mukhtiar Ahmed @ Pappu and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. M.L. Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana. Mr. R.K. Malik, Advocate for the complainant. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not press the prayer for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioner No. 3. The petition is thus, dismissed as not pressed qua petitioner No 3. As regards petitioners No. 1 and 2, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to order dated 01.01.2009, passed by this Court, petitioners No. 1 and 2 have already joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Jaipal Singh who is present in Court does not dispute the fact that petitioners No. 1 and 2 have already joined the investigation. In this view of the matter, order dated 01.01.2009, passed by this Court granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners No. 1 and 2, is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Crl. Misc. No. M-4 of 2009 -2- Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, in respect of petitioner No. 3, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed. 06.05.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE