IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5615 of 2008. Decided on: 21.05.2010. Padam Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. T.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has made a representation for the redressal of his grievance on 14th October, 1998 (Annexure A-6). It has been stated in the reply that the representation of the petitioner has been forwarded to the State Government, but the same has not been decided till date. The representation ought to have been decided by now. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The Principal Secretary, Health Services is directed to decide the Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - representation made by the petitioner on 14th October, 1998 (Annexure A-6) within a period of ten weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment, by a speaking order, that too, after hearing the petitioner or his Advocate. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. May 21, 2010. (sck).