IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-17068 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.6.2010 Chander Bhan and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Amit Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy Advocate General Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) Learned State counsel (on the instructions from ASI Sushil Kumar, who is present in court) submits that during the pendency of this petition, both the petitioners were arrested and later on enlarged on regular bail. He submits that prayer made in this petition has been rendered infructuous. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to controvert the submissions made by the learned State counsel. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 29.6.2010 'rajpal'