1 cac103.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1012 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 103 OF 2011 Prabhudas @ Rajesh Anandrao Naware ..Applicant. Vs. Jagmohand Bagarka since deceased through Lrs. ....Respondents Ms. Suvarna Telgote, Advocate for Applicant/Appellant. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- AUGUST 26, 2011 P.C. 1. The Advocate for the Applicant states that in respect of the suit premises, a decree for eviction was passed in favour of the landlords in another Suit which Decree has been confirmed by Order dated 29/11/2010 passed in CRA No. 964 of 2010 and possession of the Suit premises is taken in execution. Since the tenancy stands terminated on account of passing of the Decree in other suit, even according to the Advocate for the Applicant, present CRA has become infructuous. Statement accepted. CRA and Civil Application are dismissed. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)