IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.7901 OF 2004 Madhav Dinkar Kale, .. Petitioner Vs Madhukar Ramchandra Kanade, .. Respondent Mr Anilkumar Patil, for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 29th September, 2004. DATE : 29th September, 2004. DATE : 29th September, 2004. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By the impugned order, time to deposit a sum of Rs.One lac with the District Forum, Nashik, has been extended upto 4.10.2004. The petitioner never made any grievance before the District Forum, Nashik in respect of quantum of the amount he was directed to deposit. In view of this, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed as such. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)