IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2963 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 30.11.2010 Badri Parshad ......Appellant Versus Parbhati ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. N.S.Panwar, Advocate, for the respondent Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) This is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby his suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondent from interfering in his possession was dismissed. It is not in dispute that the respondent is the owner of the suit property and the appellant is claiming the injunction only on the basis of his possession which is said to be hostile and adverse in nature since the time of his forefathers. It may also be noticed that the appellant is not claiming his possession as permissive one. This Court in the case of Sukhwant Singh Versus Divisional Forest Officer and another 2009 (3) PLR 432 has held that a suit for permanent injunction at the asking of an unauthorized person against the true owner is not maintainable. In view of the aforesaid, I find no merit in this appeal. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. Dismissed. November 30, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE