-HC-22 ^s-^ v<iNi<n^.'^ttaTT^,'f^ITCTy snif^r 'V^K ^l+ldl 'g^ii^-—•—••'—•—••—————'•^Fj, 200 "I^^T' ^n^T^r 'f^ri^^Td^T »»^i<=ti^Ra ^L ^TT^T'^TT^R ^rf^T W.P.fs)^ PETITIONER Shallendra Tao.don, Patwai-i, P] Halka No/ BUaspur, C Ver RESPONDBN'S^ 1. 2. State of Revenue De Raipur, Chl CoUector, Chhattisgar 3. Sub BUaspur, Dividional 4, Chaadraia aged about HalkaNo.2C Bhartiya Chhattisgar: Wrif Petitioa under Article 2 S.B Hoa'ble Shri Dhirendra Mia 16.12.2008 Mr. O.P. Saliu, learaed couif Mr. Y.S. Thakur, leamed Dy|. Case of the petitioner, ia br{ dated 30th Jime, 2008 (Aiuiexwxt from P.H.No.7, R.N.M. Beltara, T^i Sarkaiida, TahsU & Distt, BUaspujr cM^f<n4vi 'HPR^if ^ fe^t <P»i^i< ^'yrf^HW^T 0,6331/2008 Tondaa, son of Gopal Prasad liged about 35 years, Occupation ^esenUy posted as Patevmi at Pafr rad Beltara Circle, TahsU and District ^hhattisgarh sus IChhattisgarh, tiirough Secretary, partnient, Dau Kalyaii Siagh Bhawan, ^attisgarh. BUaspur, Distnct BUaspur, [1, Officer, BUaspur, Distdct Cl|iliattisgarh, 3aiijara, Son of DiUari Ram. Baojara, 53 years, Occupation Patwad, Patwari residence of Near Income Tax Office, agar, BUaspur, District BUaspur, 1. 26 ofthe Constitutioa oflndia hra, J .sel for fhe petitioner. ^ Advocate General for tlie State. lef, is th.at fhe State Govt. vide order P/2) had traasfen'ed fhe petitioner Lhsil & Distt. Bilaspur to P.H.No.20, By fhe saaie order fhe responclent A J [Tft^"^feri HC-22 ^n^r^T f<Tl[ch 3T^?T ^^\^ ^Ra 's^ ^WM^ ^nl^Ko, [^<ni^li< 3TT^?T 'q^ra? 'WRW^RW"""""""""""""""""*^!^ 200 'I^ST' 3TT^T'?"CT^R'Hf^Tr z wrotL; No,4, whose naaie has been said order aad subsequenUy, c< 11.7.2008, has been transferred petitioner, The respondent No.^ questidhiag his traasfer order of disposed ofby fhis Courtwith Ub hereni) to file representation ags was directecl to decide fhe saine date of receipt of fhe represenfc leanied Govt. Advocate fhat conipUaace of traasfer order of representation. Leanied coiuisel for fhe the above directions by the ah-eady relieved respondent No. 16.9,2008. However, Uie respon^ give his joioing at his tran.sferred| Leamed cozinsel for fhe| pressiag this petition at fh.is st^ raake a representation for CoUector, BUaspur/respondent decide his representation wifhia Shri Y.S. Thakur, leamed| the State subniits fhat in. representation along wifh cop^ representation of fhe respondei^ Hidh chl^f<n^lrl '^TRT^ff ^ f^st <f^i^i< ^3?NH37T^T o^Lgly nientioned as Saatosh Raj ia fhe ^rrected vide con'ection inenio dated ^.s Patwari ofP.H,No,7, iaplace offhe ffled Writ Petition (s) No.3952/08 [Annexure P/2. The said petition was >^rty to fhe petitioner (respondent No.4 stmst his traasfer order aad fhe State ^ifhin. a period of two weeks froni the ition. It was further undertaken by n|) coercive steps shatl be taken in f|ie respondent No.4 ti31 disposal of fhe p€|titionersubraits fhat siace passiag of Court, fhe CoUector, Bilaspur has |4 vide order of Annexure P/5 dated lents are uot allowtag tiie petitioner to Iplace i.e. P.H.No.20, Sarkaada. petitioner siibmits that he is not ^ge, however, he Biay be^pennitted to of his grievaaces before the [o,2, who may be further directed to spectfied period, Dy, Advocate General appearmg for ^ase fhe petitioner files a fresh of tiiis order aad copy of earlier No.4, fhe same shall be decided by [Tft^ ^f^^ redlressal ^^^ ^ ^:^ &^'' :-22 37I^T^T f^rli?b 3TI^T sft+iich <if^a ^ \ ~5^ T^ll^lld<LI, ^nl^^Ko, f^<ni<iy STT^T 'qsra? HW^\l ^^^^""""""—"——•••••—^FJ^ ^QQ 'f^ST" W^T'^TT^IT ^Tf^T ^ petit^on the respondent No.2 wifhta a ^ receipt of fhe representation. In view of above submissj nothiag szirvives in. fhis disposed ofwifh liberty to fhe before ftie respondent No.2 for 4 petition, along with copy representation of respondent made, fhe respondent No.2 own ments m accordaace wifli the date of receipt of the df shalU (.ons of leanied counsel for fhe parties, aiid the petition is, accordiagly, t)etitioner to file a fresh representation adressal ofhis grievances raised in fhis fhis order aad copy of earUer |No.4. On such representation beiag cousider aad decide fhe same, on its l^.w, wifhm a period of Uiree weeks from l&w repres^ntation, CM^(<n^ri 'HTH^ff "^ Fs^l <p3i^i< '^3rf^R3TT^T eriod of tliree weeks from fhe date of Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge [Tft^ ^Ra^