IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17518 of 2002 Between: M/s.Precision Components, represented by Smt.C.Kiranmayee, w/o. Satyanarayana, Resident of C4, Cooperative Industrial Estate, Balanagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District Industrial Centre, Balanagar, R.R.District, represented By its General Manager. 2. The Administrative Officer, The Cooperative Industrial Estate, Balanagar, Hyderabad. 3. P.Venkatasubramanian, s/o. Late K.V.Rajagopala Iyer, R/o.No.2, Paran Rivira Apartments, 4th Main Road extension, Kothurpuram, Chennai-85. (Respondent No.3 is impleaded as per Court order dated 03.02.2003 in WPMP.No.31898 of 2002.) .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KARRA SRINIVAS FOR MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17518 of 2002 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a Writ of Mandamus with the following substantive relief:- “to direct the respondents herein to eﬀect the necessary changes in their records recognizing the petitioner as a Proprietory concern, by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.” 2. After arguing for sometime, Sri Srinivas Karra, learned counsel representing Sri M.V.S.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, requested for permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, by stating that respondent No.1 has already initiated action on the petitioner’s representation. 3. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.21978 of 2002 is dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 22.10.2008 v v