1 cri-wp-1924-11.doc pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1924 OF 2011 Hardas H. Tharwani ...Petitioner Versus 1. Senior Inspector of Police and ors. .. Respondents Mr. J. S. Chandanani for petitioner. Mr. Y. S. Shinde, APP for State. Mr. Mandar Goswami for CBI – respondent no.12. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 15, 2011. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has appointed Cable Operators and the complaints filed by them with the concerned police station are not being registered. The Cable Operators are not before us and if at all their complaints are not being registered and investigated into, Section 154 of Cr.P.C. is very 2 cri-wp-1924-11.doc clear. The Cable Operators may complain to the concerned DCP and if no action is taken thereon, they have a remedy of filing a private complaint in the court of JMFC at Ulhasnagar. Hence, the petition is disposed with liberty to file a private complaint by the Cable Operators. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)