IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23070 of 2009 PRADIP KUMAR @ CHUNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections- 392 and 411 of I.P.C. The allegations are of motorcycle loot when he is alleged with his accomplice to have abandoned the motorcycle on chase, but was apprehended. It is submitted that the petitioner has no antecedents. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.25,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Ara in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No.50/09. Both the bailors must be his father and mother respectively whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail-bonds. The petitioner is directed to be properly represented on each date in the trial including his physical appearance on 2 such dates that the court below shall so direct so that the trial may proceed expeditiously. In the event that the petitioner breaches either of the two conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail-bonds when he shall be taken into custody to facilitate the trial. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)