ash 1 crappln-200.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 200 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 766 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.M. Saraogi i/by Shri R.V. Sipahimalani for the Applicants. Shri A.R. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 4TH OCTOBER, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicants. This is an application made by the second Respondent in the Writ Petition filed by the second Respondent herein. The result of the impugned order is that the learned Magistrate has been directed to decide the application raising objection for exhibiting certain documents in terms of the law laid down by this Court in a reported judgment. Thus, this Court has not finally decided the issue of objection raised regarding admissibility of the documents filed in the complaint. This Court has passed an order of remand. The learned ash 2 crappln-200.10 Magistrate is bound to decide the objections raised in accordance with law. Hence, no case is made out for recalling the order passed in the Writ Petition. If the order in terms of the order of this Court passed in writ petition has not been passed by the learned Magistrate till today, he shall do so within a period of two months from today. The Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (A.S.OKA, J)