1 20-cas-688-2010 srj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 688 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.)NO.80 OF 2010 State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Applicants. V/s. Shri Devram Sadu Pimpale .. Respondent Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, AGP for Applicants. Mr. Krishna Kore, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. P.P. Chavan i/b. M/s. Navdeep Vora & Associate for Respondent No.2. CORAM:- G.S.GODBOLE, J DATED:- 17th OCTOBER, 2011 P.C. 1 On oral application of Ms. Mhaispurkar, learned AGP, Appellant No.3 is allowed to be transposed as Respondent No. 2 in the Civil Application and the Second Appeal. 2 RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. Mr. Kore waives service of rule on behalf of the Respondent No.1. Mr. Chavan waives 2 20-cas-688-2010 service of rule on behalf of Respondent No. 2 who was shown originally as Appellant No.3 who is now transposed as Respondent No.2. Ms. Mhaispurkar undertakes to carry out amendment within 7 weeks from today. Undertaking accepted. 3 By a separate order passed today in Civil Application No. 992 of 2010 filed by the CEO of MIDC delay in filing Appeal is condoned. Delay in filing the Appeal is duly explained in paragraph-2 of the Civil Application. Hence delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 2,500/-. 4 It will also be open to pay the costs by handing over the cheques to the Advocate for the contesting Respondent No.1. (G.S.GODBOLE, J)