IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1110 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision : March 01, 2011 Pankaj Devi ....Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present : Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 3.2.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the appellant failed to qualify even the written test and has secured 36 marks out of 200 which brings it to 18%. Accordingly, she was not called for viva voce. There is no way the appellant could seek any direction from this Court. The appeal is wholly frivolous and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. 2. In view of the fact that we have taken decision in the appeal on merit, we do not wish to pass any order on the application seeking condonation of delay. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE LPA No. 63 of 2011(O&M) -2- ( T.P.S.MANN ) March 01, 2011 JUDGE ajay-I