© IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. N0. !i /2011 Sij;Hif"ste B^BaSll %B?3^ S^.ii'^ fc:p^^?l'3^ APPELLANT : K^v-<s^-". ^SS^^r-^ ?(aff^.--s-^\"' ^•-•^ M/s Rajat Enterprises Parfner Corapany through Partnership Shri Mahavir Kumaa- GolchhaS/o Late Kanwar lal Ji Golchha, R/o Naveen Bajar Raipur, Tah & Distt Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 1) 2) Puniya Bai W/o Late Shri Tul Singh R/o Gohrapadar, Poliee Station Deobhog, Tdhsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) Murii Ram S/o Domuram Rawat, Oecupation Truck Driver, R/o Village and Post Gohrapadar, Police Station Deobhog, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) The United India Insurance Company Limited, City Branch Office No.2, Raipur Through : Divisional Manager Divisional Office, Kutcheri Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) MEMO OF APPEALUNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 3) ^ Being aggrieved by the order dated 27/11/2010 passed by ^' '.•••'' ' ' .••.-.'• •-^^"-": the court of 14th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ITTlii/T*"^, "'<.A ~~? '^£^^ ^ APPELI Rajat E Partner Company nterprises Puniya Bai and others. APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVII PROCEDL i-i-/^r Present : None for the appellant. ISt The matter is calied appears nor any appellant. The appeltant rn; matter. tv/lce. On both occasions, none ion is made on behalf of the y not be interested in prosecuting the ?, In view of the above, the appea! is dismissed for '/rant of prosecutlon. Sd!- N.K.Agama! Judae Kvr