CWP No.8134 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.8134 of 2010 Date of Decision: 06.05.2010 **** Dalel Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Haryana and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to allot a residential plot under the Oustees Policy dated 18.03.1992 (Annexure P4). The above-stated relief has been sought on the plea that the petitioner was co-owner of residential house and the land comprising Khasra No.43 Killa No.11/1 (4K – 11M) (Gair Mumkin) and Khasra No.44 Killa No.6/1 (0K – 8M) (Gair Mumkin) situated in Village Kadipur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon which was acquired by the State of Haryana for development of Sector 37, Gurgaon. (2). In this regard, the petitioner is said to have made a representation on 17.02.2010 (Annexure P2). CWP No.8134 of 2010.doc - 2 – (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition however, without expressing any views on merit, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s claim by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 06.05.2010 vishal shonkar