IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30545 of 2010 1. RAMAKANT SHARMA S/O LATE SIYA SHARAN SHARMA 2. KAUSHAL KISHORE SINGH S/O LATE MUNILAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. with Cr.Misc. No.31254 of 2010 RAM AWADHESH SINGH S/O LATE HARDEO SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIG. ----------- 2. 06.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners of both the anticipatory bail cases are different officers of the bank. Allegation is about handing over of computerized work to one Nelito Company. Irregularities are admitted that there was no tender, only quotation was there and this company Nelito has not submitted lowest quotation nor that has been made ground for entrusting work to do rather submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that its satisfactory work earlier done was taken into consideration and further there was some negotiation when he came down to lowest one. Moreover, nothing could be collected about embezzlement or bribe. So, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it may be taken as an irregularity for the purpose of bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstance of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Vigilance I,Patna, in connection 2 with Vigilance P.S. Case No.49 of 2010, Special Case 32/2010 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)