1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 392 OF 1991 Abdul Razak @ Badshah Abdul Majid & Ors. vs. Anil Kumar N. Jain AND SECOND APPEAL NO. 393 OF 1991 Abdul Razak @ Badshah Abdul Majid & Ors. vs. Sunil Kumar N. Jain Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 21, 2008. Shri A.A. Naik, learned counsel appearing for the respondent in both matters states that the respondents are not interested in recovering any mesne profits from the present appellants. He states that the respondents are even not interested in executing the impugned decrees any more as they are already in possession. In view of this statement, Shri Borkar, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw both the appeals. He points out that one of the appellants i.e. Shafiqur Rahman Shaikh s/o Abdul Razak @ Basha is present on behalf of the appellants and he has explained the 2 position to him and upon instructions from him, both the appeals are being withdrawn. In view of this position, both the appeals are allowed to be withdrawn in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents and disposed of as such. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.