1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.4901 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 K.Murali : Petitioner Vs. 1.Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Kumbakonam) Ltd., New Railway Feeder Road, Kumbakonam. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceeding of the first respondent in Letter No.4170/D/2010-3, dated 23.09.2010 and a consequential letter 18912/D/2010-2, dated 12.04.2011 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ethirajulu For Respondent No.1 : Mr.V.Rajasekaran Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.Baskaran ORDER Mr.V.Rajasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the first respondent and Mr.S.Baskaran, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the second respondent. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition challenging the proceedings of the first respondent dated 23.09.2010 as well as the proceedings dated 12.04.2011. The said proceedings are the communications sent by the Principal Secretary to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Government to the Managing Directors of all State Transport Undertakings and Managing Directors/Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Officers of all State Transport Undertakings. Thus, the proceedings, which are challenged, are the inter se communications between the Department. Even in that proceedings, it is stated that the individuals shall be informed about the order. The petitioner, who has not received so far the orders from the concerned authorities, cannot challenge the inter se communications between the department. As and when the concerned officials served a notice to the petitioner, the petitioner can very well challenge the same in the manner known to law. 3. Taking such view, I am of the considered view that the petitioner has approached this Court prematurely without an order passed against him. 4. In view of the above stated position, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach this Court as and when an order of recovery is passed against him, if he chose to do so. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Kumbakonam) Ltd., New Railway Feeder Road, Kumbakonam. +1cc to Mr.S.Baskaran, Advocate SR.No.15480 +1cc to The Special Government Pleader SR.No.15824 SML akm/31.05.11 /2p-5c/ Order made in W.P.(MD)No.4901 of 2011 Dated:- 27.04.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/