1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELALTE SIDE REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.25013 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6574 OF 2005 The Registrar, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University. ...Petitioner. Vs. Kuldip Vinayak Khope & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. A. K. Jalisatgi with Mr. A. B. Desai for the Petitioner. Mr.Amit Sale for Respondent No.1. Mr. C.R. Sonawane for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. October 27, 2005. P.C. The original Respondent No.1-University has preferred Review Petition. It is contended by them in para 7 that considering the process required for admission, it will not be possible to constitute committee and, therefore, the University cannot comply with the order of this Court. At the same time, it is pointed out in para 6 that there was no seat available for Special Backward Class category candidates. By our impugned order, we have directed the University to consider the application for admission against SBCC seat. If that seat is not available, naturally Respondent 2 No.1, the Applicant herein, cannot be expected to consider the case of the Petitioner for admission. Considering that, while noting the contention raised by the University regarding admission process, we note that there is no seat available and consequently, the Petitioner, as a matter of fact, cannot be considered for admission. No purpose would be served by recalling the order dated 5th October 2005. In view of the above, Review Petition is dismissed. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)