T x D W THE HEGH GOUR? OF JUmCATURE AT BELASPURq CHHATTESGARH WRET PETIT§§DN No. 193% OF 20m 1y PE‘HTSONER Agesh Chandra Jain, 5/0 Late Shri Tarachand Jain, aged about 60 years, resident of 25, Mdravati Colony, Rajatalab, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 1, .r’ Versus 17v f4 LX‘/Staie of Chhattisgarh through the ’ Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperatives, Mantraiaya, D.K.S.Buiiding, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) n Eiectipn Officer, Krishna Sakha Griha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Danganiya, Raipur h(Chhattisgarh) Deputy Regietrai', Cooperative Societies, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Basarit Kumar‘Tiwari, Lakhe Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5. Smt.Pramila Tiwari, Azad Chowk, Bramhanpara, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 6. Girdhariiai Sharma, Sadar Bazar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 7. Ram Kumar Dewangan, Biamhanpara, Raipur (Chhatti'sgarh) Suohri Mona Baraskar, Azacl Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 9. Shri Khemraj Dhurandhar, Shanit Vihar Colony, Azad Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 10. Damodar Goutam, Bank of D o indie, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) RESPQNDENTS Markam F’arasram, Nagrik ‘Sahakari Bank Maryadit, G.E. Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ,z WRIT PETiTiQN UNDER ARTECLE 226122? OF THE CONSTETU‘HON OF iNDlA V The petitioner most respectfully begs to submit as under :~ ” XI-HC-ZZ X WWWW) mmmm " WWWM¥P£ aamnm WK elecfing 11 members only 8 memblms have been eléé’fed is a ma‘Her of dispufe' under The said provisibn. Hence if (is submi‘H’ed fhaf fhe mcrHer' should be placed before 'rhe Depu'ry Reg‘isfmr,Co—opem‘rive So‘c‘iefies Ruipur, for adjudication. ispu‘l'e as regards e1ec‘rion of 8 members insfead of 11 member 'was‘ dedh wifh by ‘rhe Dept??? Regis'rrar, in my view if would be s'r and'fair Thai- ‘The presenf case (should be adjudica‘red upon b The Regisi'rar. Le? Q‘The wri‘r pefifioner raise a defailed elec ion .dispu‘ie faking all grievances beforefhe RegiSfrar wi'rhin 15rd s from Today. On receip'l' of such a pe1'i1'ion fhe Regis‘i'rar shall oceed 1'0 decide ‘l'he “ME:I expedifiously and preferably w n six weeks from fhe date of receipi' of he pe‘ri‘rion. I have. issued The a ove direcTion as l am noT inclined of power undegjyi'icle 226 of The ConsTiTuTion of India. IT is conTended ThaT The peTiTio r is sTiII conTinuing and’managing The affairs of The SocieTyoA‘ prayer has been made TPiaTWTiisv posiTion may be proTecTed unTil RegisTrar decides his peTiTion finally. In my view The RegisTra should consider This prayer also and pass necessary order as dee d fiT by him. Since 111a present To examine This maTTer in exerci Accordingly The peTi ion is disposed of. Sti/ \ ll VhiefJustico \ \ i l .‘/,oa,aoo ‘1’ ~‘mf r , H: A l U N GRPRJIFS/i— 9' f‘ 72 r i i e ‘f _