HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 4th May, 2006 Bail Application No. 366 of 2006 Order on the bail application of the accused CRIMINAL SIDE Ranvir Singh S/o Harpal Singh R/o Ashok Nagar Police Station – Hazara District – Pilibhit (U.P.) ….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ….. Opposite Party _____________________________________________________________ In Case Crime No. 249 of 2005 U/S 364, 302. 201 I.P.C. Police Station - Manglaur District - Haridwar _____________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Pramod Tiwari-learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The case rests on the circumstances evidence. It has been contended on behalf of the applicant that there are two circumstances which have been indicated against the accused. There is a last seen evidence of Devendra and Sanjeev. It was further contended that mere last seen evidence cannot complete the chain of the circumstance. It was further contended that the discovery has been made from the open space and it was made after a lapse of one months. It was also contended that the said articles were accessible to all. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the accused-applicant, Ranvir Singh be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned. (J. C. S. Rawat, J.) Dated 04.05.2006 Shiv