IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.21450 of 2008 Date of Decision:22.12.2008 Mangali ............... Petitioners Versus U.T., Chandigarh and others ............Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. V.B. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR J. **** The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the basic order dated 20.11.1990 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Estate Officer, U.T., Chandigarh under the endorsement dated 25.01.1991, cancelling the allotment of tenement No.2211/1, Sector 37-C, Chandigarh. Against the aforementioned order an appeal after 16 years was filed (Annexure P-2) and thereafter, revision was also tried before the Advisor to the Administrator, U.T., Chandigarh, which were dismissed. We find on reasons to interfere in the orders passed by the authorities. The tenement was allotted to the petitioner on 09.06.1978 and he remained to make payment of installments. There is no merit in this petition. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 22, 2008 Pankaj*