IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16915 of 2011 1. Shabhu Imam S/O Shaid Ali Akbar R/O Village- Mandrauli, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 2. Hari Krishna Prasad S/O Late Nageshwar Prasad R/O Village- Rasulpur, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 3. Musafir Prasad S/O Late Munar Bhagat R/O Village + P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 4. Amar Singh S/O Late Mukhlal Singh R/O Village + P.O.- Nainpura, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District - Siwan 5. Ram Kailash Bhagat S/O Late Muneshwar Bhagat R/O Village- Mandrauli, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 6. Basdeo Prasad S/O Late Saroj Sah R/O Village- Rajur Koti, P.O. + P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 7. Manager Yadav @ Manager Prasad Yadav S/O Bunilal Yadav R/O Village- Pram Hatta, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, District- Siwan 8. Shiv Shankar Prasad S/O Late Harihar Prasad R/O Village- Ukhain, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan 9. Shiv Bali Prasad Yadav S/O Late Ram Sakal Yadav R/O Village - Bharatpur, P.S.- G.B. Nagar, District- Siwan 10. Reyaj Ahmad S/O Late Mubarak Hussain R/O Village- Bindupur (Buzurg), P.S.- Muffasil Siwan, District - Siwan Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Siwan 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan 4. The Block Development Officer, Pachrukhi Block, District- Siwan 5. The Officer-In-Charge Pachrukhi Police Station, District- Siwan 6. The Officer-In-Charge Muffasil (Mahadewa) Police Station, District - Siwan 2 11.11.2011 The petitioners who are P.D.S. dealers within Pachrukhi block in the district of Siwan prays for quashing memo no.62 Mu dated 8.7.2011 issued by respondent no.4 by which they have been directed to refund the value of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Schemes at the APL rate. The petitioners submit that the chart contained in Annexure-1 has been prepared in a most mechanical manner. They further submit that they had already distributed the entire rice which was allotted to them under SGRY Scheme. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, if the 2 petitioners file a representation within six weeks from today before the Block Development Officer, Pachrukhi raising their grievance, the same would be disposed of within three months from the date of its filing. Till then, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioners. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. KHAN (S.P. Singh,J)