0/41 5’ @ $ingile Bench IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.§QWO OF 2009 (8.3.) PETITIONERS :— VSaranjeet Singh Bachchu S/o Shri Guruayal Smgh, aged about 47 Teach, resently posted at Balak Ashram ears, Occupaton — y i Bastanar, Tahsil * Bastanar, District — Bastar (C.G.). R/o Subhash Wad, Opposite Dr. Rizvi House’s, Jaglpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 2K’ Laxmi Yadav, /o Shri Pancham Ram Yadav, aged about 44 years, Teacher, Kanya Occupation — Ashram Bastanar, Tahsil — Bastanar, District Basta (C.G.) /’u D r Resident of c/o Rajesh Yadav villag 81, post Lamni, District Bastar (CJGJ. ari Prasad Panna s/o Shri Tokleram Panna, aged about 42 years, Occupation— eacher, Balak Ashram, Badekilepal, Tahsil Bastanar, District Bastar (C.G.). /o Jawahar Nagar Ward, Medguda, Jagdalur, District Bastar (C.G.. 'mcharan Nag s/o Ramnath Nag, aged about 4 years,_ occupation — Teacher, Balak Ashram Badekilepal, Tahsil Bastanar, District Bastar (C.G.). R/o Badekilepal, Tahsil Bastanar, District Bastar(C.G.) " 5”; Suryakant Dewangan S/o Neelkant‘ Dewangan, aged about 42 years, Occupation — Teacher; Kanya Ashram — Dimrapal, Bastar (C.G.) R/O Village 8L Post, Kunra, Tahsil Dharsiwa, District Raipur (C.G.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS :— 1.(_/.State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)z d er P r da , e 3 H T R p ) 4/I’Ra 4 x @ ,2 2 The Commissione’rt Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur {C.G.). 3W Collector, District Collectorate, / Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 4 .wThe Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa " Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 8a ( District Jagdalpur (0G,). Formal Party WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5240 of 2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTH’UTION OF 1NDIA SB; Hon’ble shn‘ Sau'sh K. Agnilmtri, J. Present: Shri Amiva Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri M.P:S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents 1 to 3 ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of September, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt; A.Lall v. State ofChhatzisgarh & Others], thus the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to decide their cases in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4-1nstitute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are the teachers within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make'a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In [view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition‘for adjudication. \ 4. Accordingly, the Writ petition is diSpOSed of. ’ . /, Sdl- ‘3 Satish K. Agnihmi: r g ’ Judge Amit t . l 2007 (1)BLJ 255 PETITIONERS : Saranjeet Singh Bachchu & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.