1 wp7789.11.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7789 OF 2011 Shambhosinh Subhash Patil & Ors. ....Petitioners. Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the Petitioners. Mr. Hemant Prabhulkar i/by M/s. Jurisconsultus for Respondent No.1. CORAM :- D.K DESHMUKH AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE :- 22 SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- Admittedly the reason for which the application of the Petitioners has been rejected, is correct. The Petitioners did claim in the affidavit filed before the Respondents that they are unmarried when, even according to them they are married. In our opinion, the mistake cannot be said to be bonafide because a statement is made that the Petitioners are unmarried when in fact they are married. If they had disclosed that they are married, they were required to disclose the details about their wives, the Corporation can make 2 wp7789.11.sxw ssm inquiry into the antecedents of wives of the Petitioners. That opportunity is denied to the Corporation by making a misleading statement. In this situation, therefore, in our opinion, it will not be appropriate to interfere in our extra ordinary jurisdiction. 2 The Petition is rejected. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)