THE HON’BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1896 OF 2005 14-11-2005 Between: M.A.Waheed & Others. ……APPELLANTS And Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, rep. by its Commissioner & Others. …….RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1896 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ) When the writ petition was filed, the main grievance of the petitioners was that the respondents in the writ petition were making constructions without getting permission from the Municipal authorities. Counsel for appellants submits that, after the appeal was filed, the respondents pleaded in their counter that they had obtained permission now. But the permission should have not been granted, because, it violates certain Rules and certain Government Orders. Since admittedly the respondents are now in possession of permission, therefore, the writ petition as well as the writ appeal have become infructuous and are accordingly dismissed. However, if the appellants have any grievance against grant of permission, they are at liberty to take recourse to law. No order as to costs. ___________________ (BILAL NAZKI, ACJ) 14th November 2005 _____________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY,J) ajr