IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2008 / 23RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22676 of 2008(Y) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ----------------------- 1. JOSEPH ISAAC, NEYYARAPPALLIL, CMC 23, CHERTHALA. 2. THANKAMMA ISAAC, NEYYARAPPALLIL, CMC 23, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. SECRETARY, CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE CHERTHALA MUNCIPAL COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY SRI. OMPRAKASH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.22676/2008 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1; COPY OF THE SAID APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF THE EXT.P1. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION PENDING BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 22676 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 14, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that he had made Ext.P1 application before the 1st respondent for a building permit and as orders were not forthcoming, he has moved the Municipal Council by filing Ext.P3. 2. The learned standing counsel for the respondents also confirms the pendency of the aforesaid applications. 3. Taking note of the submissions made as above, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 2nd respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment and the decision thereon shall be communicated to the petitioner. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-