25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP. 126/2009 ANURAG MITTAL Appellant Through; Appellant in person versus RACHNA MITTAL . Respondent Through: Mr. B.D. Kaushik, Adv. with respondent in person WITH MAT.APP. 119/2009 ANURAG MITTAL Appellant Through: Appellant in person versus RACIiNA AGGARWAL Respondent Through: Mr. B.D. Kaushik, Adv. with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR ORDER % 20.12.2011 Appellant is present in person. Respondent is also present in person along with her counsel, Mr. B.D. Kaushik. Both the parties submit that the mater in dispute has been settled with the intervention of the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts. A photocopy of the report of the Mediation Centre of Tis Hazari Courts is placed on record, which is Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Exhibit C-1. Both the parties submit that in terms of settlement arrived at between the parties, both the parties have agreed to withdraw their respective cases filed by them against each other. The appellant now seeks to withdraw these appeals in terms of the said Settlement dated 15.10.2011. The appellant is accordingly permitted to withdraw both these appeals. In Matrimonial Appeal No.126/2009, the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 31.8.2009 whereby the learned Trial Court had dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HM Act). So far as Matrimonial Appeal No.119/2009 is concerned, in this appeal the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 31.8.2009 passed by the learned Trial Court granting decree of divorce in favour of the respondent and against the appellant. Section 9 petition and the divorce petition filed by the respondent under Section 13(i)(ia) were decided by the learned Trial Court through a common judgment dated 31.8.2009. Since the appellant has withdrawn the present appeal, therefore, the impugned judgment and decree dated 31.8.2009 shall attain finality between the parties. It is also directed that the respondent will render full cooperation in the quashing of FIR No.98/2003 got registered by her against the appellant and his family members under Sections 498-A/406/323 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the parties are also directed that they will withdraw all the cases if any left to be withdrawn by them in terms of said settlement. It is also directed that both the parties shall not deviate from the terms of the settlement under any circumstances whatsoever. Both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above settlement. KAItASH GAMBHIRJ DECEMBER 20, 2011 tp