IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5316 of 2008. Decided on: 23.06.2010. __________________________________________________________ Chet Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has made a representation vide Annexure P-1, dated 5.1.1997 for the redressal of his grievance. The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he is entitled to the benefits of the judgment rendered by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Tribunal in O.A. No.66 of 1986, dated 13th December, 1995. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed. There shall be a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner filed vide Annexure P-1 in view of the principles laid in the judgment rendered by the learned Tribunal in O.A. No.66 of 1986, dated 13th December, 1995, within a period of six weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 23, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?