IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5339 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO. 5339 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO. 5339 OF 2005. Edrich Miranda. ... Applicant. Versus. State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Applicant-in-person present. Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 20th December, 2006. : 20th December, 2006. : 20th December, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Applicant appearing in person. Perused the report submitted by the learned trial Judge. The report discloses that the Warrant was not issued as the Applicant did not pay process fee. However, this Application has become academic as the complaint filed by the Applicant has been disposed of. The grievance of the Applicant is that proper action has not been taken against the 1st Respondent. The Applicant himself states that on a complaint made by him, the 1st Respondent was transferred. If the 1st Respondent is transferred, no further direction can be issued in this Application. If any complaint made by the Applicant against the said Respondent No.1 is pending, appropriate authority is bound to look into the complaint. No case is made out for grant of any relief. The report submitted by the learned trial Judge is accepted. Application is disposed of. The Report be kept in a sealed envelope. Judge. Judge. Judge.