FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2365 OF 2011 "Vishnu Dadarao Parakhe and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Avinash D. Aghav,Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. K.U. More, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 19TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that this Court has disposed of few petitions with similar prayer and identical facts. He placed one of such orders on record, dated 21st April, 2011, passed in Writ Petition Nos. 2980/2011, 1566/2011, 3140/2011, 3139/2011 and 3141/2011, and submitted that similar order may be passed in this writ petition also. Learned counsel for the respondent - Zilla Parishad has no objection for disposing of this writ petition also in terms of the order dated 21st April, 2011, passed in above-mentioned writ petitions. Hence, we pass the following order. "Every individual petitioner is allowed to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2365 OF 2011 "Vishnu Dadarao Parakhe and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 Parishad, for the prayer, as made in the present writ petition, with all the supporting documents and more particularly, the judgment of this Court dated 13th October, 2010 in a group of three writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 2254/2010, 4447/2010 and 4449/2010), within a period of four weeks from today. If the representations, as aforementioned, are made by the petitioners, the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad to consider their representations on merits in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made by this Court in the judgment dated 13th October, 2010 in a group of aforementioned three writ petitions, as expeditiously as possible and preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of their representations. The Chief Executive Officers to pass separate speaking order on every representation made by the petitioners in this writ petition, and communicate the same to the respective petitioner, within a period of two weeks from the date of passing the final order. If, for any reason, the Chief Executive Officer is not FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2365 OF 2011 "Vishnu Dadarao Parakhe and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 inclined to allow the petitioner's representation for the prayer made therein, he shall give an opportunity of being heard to such petitioner before passing the final order. All contentions of the parties are kept open. It is also open to the petitioners to place, alongwith the representation, a copy of the writ petition/s with all annexures thereto and the reply-affidavits with all annexures thereto, before the concerned Chief Executive Officer. With these observations, the present writ petition is disposed of." [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-