1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6842/2007 Ram Lal vs The Civil Judge (Sr. Div) & Anr. Date of order : 22.10.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Kishan Bansal, for the petitioners. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the trial court dated 25th Sept., 2007. It is true that the order is not detailed order and the trial court has passed the order in brief and impleaded rno.2 as party in the suit for injunction filed by the petitioner-plaintiff against the State. After going through the facts of the case, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India when petitioner failed to show that any prejudice has been caused to him. The trial court also observed that by impleading respondent as party in the suit, no prejudice will be caused. Apart from that, the petitioner failed to show how the order is prejudical to him. 2 In view of the above, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed having no merit. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-