IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22720 of 2009 MINTOO KUMAR @ MINTOO KUMAR PATEL @ MINTU PATEL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.10.2009. N.H./ The bail plea of the petitioner in the instant case had earlier been rejected by this Court under orders dated 14.11.2008 (Annexure-1). It is submitted on his behalf that by now four witnesses have been examined in the trial and other witnesses are not being examined. As such petitioner deserves to be granted bail. Let the trial court consider his prayer for grant of bail if he has not been named in course of the trial. Let this order be communicated to the court of Additional Sessions Judge-X, Patna in connection with Digha P.S. Case No.25 of 2008 through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)