HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS WRTT PE.TITION (Q No. 894 of2009 1. 2. {€ 4. RESPgNDENTS : 1. 2. M/s. Shril Rudra Ushiia Udyog, Throu^i Proprietor - Vijay Kumar Agrawal, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Prahlad Rai Ji Agrawal R/o Near Bambay Garage, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) M/s. Bhagwati Rice Mill, Tlirougli Proprietor Balram Agt'awal, aged bout 49 years, Son of Shi'i Pralilad Rai Agrawal Ryo Near Bambay Garage, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) M/s. Prema Agrotech, Through Proprietor Aniit Kumar Agrawal, aged about 31 years, son of Nandkisliore, Gzyrati Colony, Dhamtari, District Dhanitari (C.G.) M/s. Savitri Dhan Kutai Udyog, Tlirough Partner Naval Kishore Agi'awal, aged about 48 yeai-s, son of Late Mulchand AgrawaL R/b Gujrati Colony, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Dq3as-tmesit of Food and Civil Supplies, D.K.S. Bhawan^ Raipur (C.G.) Fcod Corporation of Iiidia, Tlirougli: Tlie General Manager, Regional Office, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Post Pendari, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Food Corporation of India, Tlirough: The .^rea l^dkuiager (Coiimiercial) District Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (G.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THElCONSTmJTION OF INDIA SBiHoii'ble Slui Satish K. Agn&otri, J. Present: ShriN.P.Koshta-Advocateforthepetitioners. ShriAjit Singli, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondent No. 1. Shri Prashasit Jaiswal, Semor Advocate with Sliri ShailendraShanBa, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 and 3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 30m day of June, 2009) I.A. No. 2. This is an application for withdrawal of the petition cn the gi'ounds stated therein. Leamed counsel appearing for other side have no objection. The application is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Amit Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ..r