IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 3814 of 2011 alongwith CWP No. 3917 of 2011. Date of Decision : November 2 , 2011 1. CWP No. 3814 of 2011 Suresh Kumar Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents 2. CWP No. 3917 of 2011 Shyam Rattan Dixit Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner(s) :Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 3814 of 2011. Mr. S. D. Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP No. 3917 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 and 2 in CWP No. 3814 of 2011 and for respondents No. 1 to 4 in CWP No. 3917 of 2011. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 3 in CWP No. 3814 of 2011. None for respondent No. 5 in CWP No. 3917 of 2011 Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Justice Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seek liberty to withdraw the present petitions. Parties undertake to join their place of posting in terms of order dated 13.5.2011, positively within a period of one week from today. Till then it shall be open for the petitioners to avail leave of the kind due. Interim order stands vacated. 2. Parties are also at liberty to make a detailed representation(s) to the authorities pointing out the hardships suffered by them on account of transfer. Posting of an employee is solely the prerogative of the employer. It is open for the authority to look into the grievances of the representationists in accordance with law, justice and equity. The representation(s) be decided positively within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt thereof. 3. Both the petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. November 2 , 2011 (PK)