S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1378/2009 Pradeep Kumar Mahla Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Date of order : 25.02.2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. R.S.Choudhary for the petitioner. The petitioner submits that he has appeared in the physical and written examination and has been intimated vide Annex.4 that he is not qualified for interview. However, the order Annex.4 does not disclose the reason as to how and why he is not qualified for interview. In this view of the matter, let the petitioner make a detailed representation ventilating his grievances including seeking from the respondent RPSC the reasons which disentitled him for the interview. If such a representation is made within one week from today, the RPSC shall decide the same within ten days therefrom. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 2519/2009 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1378/2009 Pradeep Kumar Mahla Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Date of order : 25.02.2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. R.S.Choudhary for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp