IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9486 of 2010 PAPPU KUMAR YADAV, S/o Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is a young boy and the money has been recovered and he is in custody since 26.11.2009 and now the father of the petitioner undertakes to be responsible for the petitioner’s conduct, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 385 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner who will take responsibility of the petitioner’s conduct after his release from custody. (ii) That the bailor - 2 - shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)