IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32558 of 2009 1. CHHANGUR RAM 2. SUNIL RAM 3. ANIL RAM----PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 9.11.2009 Heard the Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are named as accused in connection with Ramgarh P.S. case No. 56 of 2009 instituted for offences under Section 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the wife of Chhangur Ram, namely, Befi Devi had instituted a case under Sections 376,352,380 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code against the Birbal Ram, husband of the informant Dewanti Devi. He was taken into custody in connection with that case and the bail was not granted to him just to put pressure on the wife petitioner no.1, Befit Devi, present case has been instituted. In the First Information Report there is no statement that anyone has seen the petitioners that they have set on fire, the house of the informant. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. Let them surrender before the Court below 2 within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Ramgarh P.S. case No. 56 of 2009,subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.kumar