AB 4022/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BD AGARWAL This application under section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, na mely, Debarshi Baruah and Meghali Barua seeking anticipatory bail in the event o f their arrest in connection with Latasil Police Station Case No. 248 of 2011 under section 420/506/34 of the IPC. Heard Mr. S Munir, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. BS Sinha, learned Addl.P.P. for the State. After going through the documents, it appears to me that d ispute is essentially for non-implementation of the terms and conditions of the sale agreement. According to the informant, the accused are not allowing to cons truct the 4th Floor despite payment. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that as per agreement, construction can be allowed onl y after execution of the sale deed and after payment of the amount in considerat ion. Having regard to all the aspects, custodial interro gation of the petitioners may not be required and hence prayer for anticipator y bail is accepted. Accordingly, the Investigating Officer is directed to re lease the accused petitioners in the event of their arrest on furnishing bail of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with one local surety of like amount to th e satisfaction of the arresting authority. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.