1 wp1694.09-1695-1696.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1694 of 2009 WITH Criminal Writ Petition No. 1695 of 2009 WITH Criminal Writ Petition No. 1696 of 2009 Mr. Chandrakant Oza ....Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. ....Respondent Mr. R.M. Kedia for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. More-APP for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 29th July, 2011 PC: The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing of criminal complaints nos. 1236/2006, 1237/2006 and 1239/2006. There are two grievances of the petitioner. That though in a notice issued under Section 138 pertains to 7 cheques deposited at a time, the respondent-Complainant has filed three cases. It is further contended that verification as required has not been done and, therefore, the proceedings are required to be quashed. 2. Undisputedly, the Complainant has been examined as required under Section 202 of the Cr. P.C., and as such I do not find any merit insofar as second contention is concerned. 3. Insofar as first contention regarding three separate cases being filed is concerned, I find that the grievance of the petitioner would not survive if the 2 wp1694.09-1695-1696.sxw learned Magistrate is directed to decide and dispose of three cases together. Petitions disposed of with aforesaid observations. 4. Needless to state that insofar as other contentions raised in the petition are concerned, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise the said contentions at the stage of trial. (B.R. GAVAI, J)