IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17693 of 2011 1. Ranjan Kumar Singh S/O Jai Prakash Singh R/O Village-Sadhpur, P.S-Daudpur, Dist-Chhapra(Saran) 2. Prabhat Kumar Singh, S/O Daroga Singh, R/O Village- Hekam (Ekma) P.S-Ekma, Distt-Chhapra(Saran) 3. Rahul Kumar Singh S/O Raghaw Singh, R/O Village+P.O-Nachap, P.S-Manjhi Dist Chhapra (Saran) Versus 1. The Union Of India Through Officer Of Inspector Generel Of Police Bihar Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna(Bihar) 2. The Officer Of Deputy Inspector General Of Police Group Centre Central Reserve Police Force Muzaffarpur, Jhaphan (Bihar). 3. The Members Of The Recruitment Board, Group Centre, Jhapahan Muzaffarpur (Bihar) ---------------------------------- 4 22/12/2011 No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Union of India since counter affidavit has not been returned till date after vetting. Looking at the nature of the relief which has been prayed for, the Court is willing to dispose of the matter without the counter affidavit by giving a categorical direction upon the Inspector General of Police, Bihar Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna (respondent no. 1) that he will take up the case of all these three petitioners, look into the record of the recruitment and convey to the petitioners the final - 2 - decision with regard to the merit position and the marks obtained by these petitioners vis-à-vis the last man appointed in that category because there is some reflection that the reason for non-selection was the petitioners not making it to the merit list. Since such statement is vague, therefore, this writ application was filed. Respondent no. 1, the Inspector General of Police, Bihar Sector, C.R.P.F., Patna must communicate to the petitioners the above position within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt or production of a copy of this order, failure will entail consequences. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)