S.A. No. 84 of 2008 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate present for the plaintiff / appellant. Mr. R.C. Upadhyay, Advocate present for the defendant / respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and decree dated 07.10.2008, passed by the First Appellate Court (District Judge, Almora) in Civil Appeal No. 01 of 2006, affirming the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2006, passed by the trial court in Suit No. 20 of 2001. I have also gone through the judgment and decree passed by the trial court. The trial court has discussed the evidence on record, at length before recording the finding of fact against the plaintiff (present appellant) that he was not in possession of the land in suit. The trial court, particularly, relied on the admissions made by P.W. 2 (plaintiff) who has admitted that at the time he purchased the land it was Kishan Lal (defendant) who was in possession on the disputed part of the land. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the impugned judgment and decree and other papers on record, this Court does not find any sufficient reason to interfere with the finding of fact recorded by the courts below. Moreover, there is Survey Commissioner’s report also against the plaintiff. There is no substantial question of law involved in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed summarily. (P.C. P., J.) 16.12.2008 HN