IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5538 of 2009 RAM BABU YADAV …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV 3. SURAJDEO YADAV …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 02. 28.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to o.p.nos.2 and 3 by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. This Court has two reasons to reject the present application. (1) The petitioner is not the informant of the case. He, however, claims to be the aggrieved person. (2) On the strength of the supervision note dated 08.06.2008 produced in the proceeding o.p.nos.2 and 3 were released on bail. It is the contention of the petitioner that subsequent thereto, another supervision note dated 15.06.2008 was prepared by Deputy Superintendent of Police in which implication of o.p.nos.2 and 3 in the crime was found. It is not the case that supervision note dated 08.06.2008 never existed. This Court is satisfied that on the strength of the aforesaid submissions no case for cancellation of bail is made out. The application is rejected. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )