IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.920 of 2005 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 12, 2011 KALISHO DEVI ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This order shall dispose of two Civil Writ Petitions viz. Civil Writ Petition No.920 of 2005 (Kalisho Devi v. State of Haryana and others) and Civil Writ Petition No.16967 of 2006 (Raj Kumar v. State of Haryana and others), as common questions of law and facts are involved. 2 For reference to record, Civil Writ Petition No.920 of 2005 (Kalisho Devi v. State of Haryana and others) is being taken up. 3 This petition seeks quashing of order dated 22.8.2003 (Annexure P-1) vide which Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government Haryana, Finance Department, directed revision of pay scales. 4 It has been brought out by Shri R.S. Malik, Advocate, Civil Writ Petition No.920 of 2005 2 (counsel for the petitioner in CWP 16967 of 2006) that this Court has already considered the issue raised in these petitions in Om Parkash v. State of Haryana, 2008 (3) S.C.T. 310 (CWP No.18601 of 2006 decided on 10.4.2008). Impugned order dated 28.8.2003, which is subject matter of the present petitions, has been quashed. 5 Learned counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute the facts, as noticed above. 6 In view of the above, these petitions are decided in terms of judgment rendered by this Court in Om Parkash's case (supra). July 12, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?