- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.381 OF 2002 All India Permit Holders Bus Owners Association, through its Chairman, Prabhakar Kerba Dubbewar, Age 47 years, Occ. Business, R/o Laxmi Niwas, Dayanand Nagar, In front of Visawa Garden. V.I.P. Road, Nanded. ... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, through Transport Commissioner, Mumbai, (Copy to be served on Government Pleader, High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad) 2. The Superintendent of Police, Nanded, District Nanded. 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nanded, District Nanded. 4. Deputy Regional Transport Officer, Nanded, District Nanded. - 2 - 5. Mr. Ramrao Gadekar, Age 40 years, Occ. Service as Police Inspector, Ardhapur Police Station. 6. Mr. Angule, Age 45 years, Occ. Service as Police Inspector, Vazirabad Police Station. 7. Mr. Gaidhane, Age 40 years, Occ. Service as Police Officer, Vazirabad Police Station. ... RESPONDENTS ----- Shri U.S. Undre, Advocate holding for Shri P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the petitioner Shri S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for respondents. ----- CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 10th February, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER HARDAS, J.) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioner, which claims to be the Association of Bus owners holding All India Permit, claim the following reliefs : - 3 - “C) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents that they should not detain and seize Luxury Tourist buses having All India Permit. D) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to arrest the drivers and owners of Luxury buses while doing the transportation business according to law. E) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from interfering in the business of petitioner’s association/ their members from doing their business of transportation under All India Permit. F) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to initiate contempt of court against the respondent for violating the orders passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.362/98. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ” 2. According to us, the petitioners are not entitled for such sweeping reliefe. In the event the respondents/ authorities, in the exercise of the various powers conferred on them by the - 4 - Statute, commit infraction of any law or procedure, the individual bus owners or the persons involved in the individual case have remedies available to them in law of challenging the said action. In the light of the matter, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere in the present petition which prays for such sweeping reliefs. 3. In the result, therefore, this petition stands dismissed with no order as to costs. [ SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] [ P.V. HARDAS, J.]