THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.28355 of 2010 DT.16.11.2010 Between: Kurnool District Class Govt.Class-IV Employees Cooperative House Building Society Limited … Petitioner And The District Collector, Kurnool & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B.Narasimha Sharma Counsel for respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in trying to issue patta certificates in favour of individual persons in the petitioner-Society in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.4.20 cents in Survey Nos.704, 708 and 692 of Kallur Gram Panchayat, Kurnool District, as illegal and arbitrary. In my opinion, this writ petition is wholly misconceived because even according to the petitioner, when the proposed action of respondent No.3 in seeking to grant pattas in respect of certain plots situated in the petitioner’s layout to third parties, was brought to the notice of respondent No.2, he has issued proceedings in Rc.C.3359/2010, dated 12.11.2010, wherein he has requested respondent No.3 to stop issuing pattas. Such being the case, if respondent No.3 acts in violation of the said proceedings, the petitioner is entitled to approach respondent Nos.1 and 2 and seek appropriate relief. Respondent No.3, being the subordinate Officer of respondent Nos.1 and 2, is amenable to the executive and disciplinary jurisdiction of his superior officers in the hierarchy. As the desired relief was already granted by respondent No.2, this writ petition, which is for enforcing the direction given by respondent No.2, cannot be entertained, at this stage. Moreover, no basis is shown by the petitioner in support of its apprehension that respondent No.3 is acting in defiance of the proceedings issued by respondent No.2. If the petitioner approaches respondent Nos.1 and 2, there is no reason for this Court to doubt that they will take appropriate action against respondent No.3, if he seeks to act in violation of the direction given by respondent No.2. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36184 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 16.11.2010 VGB