IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 21ST MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4342 of 2010(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- 'M/S.PUTHEN MODERN RICE MILL', OKKAL P.O, KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER P.D.THOMAS. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.DAMODARAN NAMBOODIRI RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, IST CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR. 2. THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COMMERCIAL TAXES, ADDITIONAL BENCH,ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,REVENUE RECOVERY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ALUVA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 4342 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 10th February , 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved of Exts. P8, P8A and P8B notices issued under the Revenue Recovery Act, seeking to realise the amounts stated as due from the petitioner in respect of Exts.P1 and P2 assessment order and penalty order respectively, which, however, has been modified as per Ext.P3 order passed by the first appellate authority and are still pending consideration before the second respondent by way of Exts. P4 and P5 Second Appeals, accompanied by Exts. P6 and P7 stay petitions . 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P6 and P7 petitions, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from W.P.(C) No. 4342 OF 2010 2 the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Exts. P6 and P7 petitions for stay, all further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P8 series of demand notices shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk