Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 Date of decision:- 1.10.2010 Ranjit Singh @ Rania and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents 2. Criminal Misc.No. M- 20849 of 2010 Pal Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG Punjab. Mr. Varinder Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) This order shall dispose of both the aforementioned petitions filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 106 dated 10.8.2004, under Sections 341,323,506, 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur (Annexure P-1) in Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 and for quashing of Rapat No. 22 dated Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 -2- 10.8.2004, under Sections 452,323,506, 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC (in Criminal Misc.No. M- 20849 of 2010) in FIR No. 106 dated 10.8.2004, under Sections 341,323,506, 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur in Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010, on the basis of compromise. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been stated by learned counsel for both the parties that the parties belong to same village. Further contended that due to intervention of respectable persons and relatives from both the sides, the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably vide compromise Annexure P-3. Both the parties have also come present with their respective counsel and admitted the factum of compromise. Reply on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3 by way of short affidavit of respondent No.2-Pal Singh has also been filed in this regard in Crl. Misc. No. M-20835 of 2010 and reply on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3 by way of short affidavit of respondent No.3- Jasvir Kaur has also been filed in this regard in Crl. Misc. No. M- 20849 of 2010. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Hence, in the interest of harmonious relations between the parties, the present petition is accepted and FIR No. 106 dated 10.8.2004, under Sections 341,323,506, 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur (Annexure P-1) in Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 and for quashing of Rapat No. 22 dated 10.8.2004, under Sections 452,323,506, 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC (in Criminal Misc.No. M- 20849 of 2010) in FIR No. 106 dated 10.8.2004, under Sections 341,323,506, 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC, registered Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 -3- at Police Station Ahmedgarh, District Sangrur in Criminal Misc.No. M- 20835 of 2010 alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed qua petitioners-Ranjit Singh @ Rania, Chamkaur Singh, Amrik Singh, Jasvir Singh @ Bhola, Sukhdev Singh, Shamshad Khan and Jasvir Kaur (in Crl. Misc. No. M-20835 of 2010) and Pal Singh, Kamikar Singh, Bhola Singh, Pritam Singh, Lachhman Singh, Majid Khan, Dulla Khan, Shifta and Ajmer Kaur (in Crl. Misc. No.M-20849 of 2010). The petitions are disposed of accordingly. October 01, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE