1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.236 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.3983 OF 1998 Lexicon Finance Ltd. ..Plaintiff. Vs. M/s. Indiana Dairy and others ..Defendants. .... Mr. Sameer Khedekar i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Plaintiff. Ms Gayatri Sharma i/b S.K. Srivastava & Co. for Defendants 2 and 3. Mr. G.G. Ketkar, 1st Assistant to Court Receiver present. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 13th August, 2009. P.C. : On 6th September, 2007 a learned Single Judge of this Court directed the Court Receiver to implement the directions that were issued by the Karnataka High Court on 18th November, 2004 in Company Application 1593 of 2000 and connected matters. The Court Receiver has made a grievance that the Plaintiff has not co-operated with the Receiver as a result of which further directions for appointing a valuer and for 2 finalizing the terms and conditions of sale have not been issued. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff states that the Plaintiff undertakes to co-operate with the Court Receiver and to attend the next meeting which has now been fixed by this Court with the convenience of all the learned counsel. Parties shall appear before the Court Receiver on 25th August, 2009 at 3.00 p.m. on which day the Court Receiver is directed to issue necessary directions in implementation of the orders dated 6th September, 2007 of this Court and 18th November, 2004 of the Karnataka High Court. The Court Receiver shall give notice to the Official Liquidator who is also directed to remain present through his representative before the Court Receiver. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff states that the Plaintiff shall deposit with the Court Receiver an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards the charges of the valuer and an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards meeting the advertisement expenses on or before the next date of hearing. In the event that the Plaintiff does not co-operate with the Court Receiver, the Receiver is directed to place a report forthwith before this Court in order to enable the Court to take a decision or to take such further action as may be necessary in the interests of justice. It is clarified 3 that the aforesaid payment of Rs.10,000/- and Rs.25,000/- is an initial ad hoc payment and the Plaintiff shall reimburse the Court Receiver for the actual expenses that may be required to be expended. The Report is disposed of. *****