IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2009 / 21ST SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 634 of 2006(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.26122/2002 Dated 24/01/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/REVIEW PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------- M/S. CHIRACKAL METAL CRUSHERS, PRALAYAKKAD, THURUTHY P.O., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SHIBU KURIAKOSE. BY ADV. SRI.K.G.ANIL BABU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (FINANCE), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SALES TAX OFFICER, 1ST CIRCLE, PERUMBAVOOR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... R.P.NO. 634 OF 2006 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 ORDER Learned counsel for the review petitioner states that the decision in Suma Devi V. State of Kerala(2005(2) KLT 870) though applied to dismiss a writ petition, certain other clarificatory orders are required. Review petition is accordingly allowed. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/12/8