IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3697 of 2005 1. ANUJ KUMAR SON OF LATE KAMALDHARI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DARGAH ROAD, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTT. PATNA. 2. RAM NATH SINGH SON OF REWATI RAMAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA- SHEOPURI, BEUR ROAD, P.O.- ANISHABAD, P.S. GARDANIBAGH, DISTT- PATNA. 3. ANAND KUMAR GIRI SON OF SRI RAM GIRI, RESIDENT OF VILL.- SHARMAMATH, P.S. MASAURHI, DISTT. PATNA. 4. BIRENDRA KUMAR JHA SON OF SRI MAHESHWAR JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BRAHMPUR, P.O.- BAUSI, P.S.- BAUSI, DISTRICT- BANKA. 5. KAPILDEO SINGH SON OF SRI NAND KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAUGAIN, P.S.- MURAR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 6. RAJESH KUMAR VERMA SON OF K.P.VERMA, RESIDENT OF RAOD NO. 1, RAJENDRA NAGAR, PATNA, P.S.- RAJENDRA NAGAR, DISTRICT. -PATNA. 7. PARASHAR MUNI SINGH SON OF LATE HARGOBIND SINGH, OF VILLAGE- MAHULI, P.S. -ARA MUFASIL, DISTT- BHOJPUR. 8. AKSHTANAND SINGH SON OF SRI DAMODAR DAS, OF VILLAGE- KUJAPI, P.S.-CHANDAUTI, DISTT- GAYA. 9. MD. MUKHTAR ANSARI SON OF MD. NASRULLAH ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SURAJPURA, P.S.- DAWATH, DISTT- ROHTAS. 10. MD. SHAMS RAJA SON OF RAIYUM KHIZAR, RESIDENT OF-DIWAN MOHALLA, CITY COURT PATNA- 7 P.S.- PATNA CITY DISTT. PATNA. Versus 1. THE BIHAR SCHOOL EXAM.BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS “THE BOARD”) 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, PATNA. 3. THE ADMINISTRATOR, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, SINHA LIBRARY ROAD, PATNA (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS “THE ADMINISTRATOR”) 4. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, SINHA LIBRARY ROAD, PATNA (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TOI AS “ THE SECRETARY”) 17 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent Board. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some similarly situated persons had approached this Court for redressal of their grievances, which were disposed of by orders dated 11.10.2010 passed in CWJC No. 17315 of 2010 and CWJC No. 17234 of 2010 as well as the order dated 12.10.2010 passed in CWJC No. 17474 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were working in the Board for a long period on daily wages and as such they were entitled to be considered on regular establishment in terms of the resolution of the State Government dated 16.3.2006, whereof the cut off date has been extended to 11.12.1990, issued by the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department (in the General Department) vide Memo No. 639 dated 16th of March 2007 as contained in Annexure 26 to the supplementary counter affidavit filed on 21st of September 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid grievances, the petitioner proposes to represent the matter before respondent no. 4 stating his grievances as also the copy of the aforesaid resolution as also the orders passed by this Court as referred to the above in case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks stating the details of the grievances as also the copy of 3 relevant documents as referred to the above along with the certified copy of the present order, the representation of the petitioner be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation which may be disposed of by reasoned order and be communicated to the petitioner. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)