IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 29TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 19933 of 2011(N) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ANI RAJAN.A., LIBRARY ATTENDER, (ON SUSPENSION), S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM RESIDING AT KURUMBOLI MEKKETHARA, ALUMKADAVU P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2. SENIOR JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM-691 571. 4. THE CHAIRMAN, GOVERNING BODY, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM-691 571. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.VIJULAL R4 BY ADVS. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN (MVA), SRI.A.R.EASWAR LAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.19933/2011 N APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.28/09/2010. P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT,2/POLY/2296 DTD.29/10/2010. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 2/06/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.19933 of 2011-N - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of September, 2011. JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges Ext.P3 order of suspension dated 29.10.2010. The petitioner has been working as Library Attender in S.N. Polytechnic College, Kottiyam. The suspension was ordered pending disciplinary enquiry. 2. The 4th respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the fourth respondent that there are two enquiries against him and the first enquiry is already over and the report has been submitted. Regarding to the second enquiry also, the proceedings are being finalised and it is assured that the same will be completed by 30.10.2011. 5. In the above view of the matter, I am not going into in detail the contentions raised by both parties. Since the disciplinary enquiry is not completed, any decision by this Court on the merits of the matter will prejudice either of the parties. Recording the submission of the wpc 19933/2011 2 Management that the disciplinary enquiry will be completed before 30.10.2011, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/