IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1766 of 2008 RAM KUMAR MAHTO Versus BIJUL MAHTO@BIJULI MAHTO & ORS ----------- 2. 24.10.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court when the petitioner had filed an objection to the report of the Pleader Commissioner, the court below having noticed of the objection, if it has passed a reasoned order rejecting such objection, the same cannot be held to be jurisdictional error. As a matter of fact, the grievance of the petitioner seems to be with regard to certain observations made in respect of the report of the Pleader Commissioner. Counsel for the petitioner apprehends that in view of those observations the suit itself now would be disposed of in the light of the finding recorded by the Pleader Commissioner. In the opinion of this Court such apprehension is wholly misconceived, inasmuch as the report of the Pleader Commissioner will have merely an evidentiary value only if the same stands corroborated from other material evidence. At this stage to make any comment on the report of the 2 Pleader Commissioner as has been done by the court below is only for the purpose of deciding the objection filed by the petitioner. That being so, this application is misconceived and is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/