IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1413 of 2010(S) ----------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9259/2009 DATED 17/09/2009 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC ------------------------------------------------ ABDULLA & UMMER ESTATE (P) LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.23, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, CROSS, BANGALORE, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESENT MANAGING DIRECTOR, KURIACHAN CHACKO. BY ADV. SRI.S.VIJAYAN NAYAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NOS. 1 AND 3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. M. BEENA, WIFE OF VIJAYAN, AGED 35, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT COLLECTOR'S QUARTERS, ERNAKULAM. 2. VIDHYADHARAN, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, 45 YEARS, VILLAGE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, RESIDING AT ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Contempt Case(C) No. 1413 of 2010 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the judgment in W.P.(C) No.9259/2009, it was held that the property covered by Ext.P7 was alienable and heritable. According to the petitioners, the property has been mutated in their name also. According to them, in spite of it, after the judgment, when tax paid was accepted and Annexure-C receipt was issued, it was indicated that the petitioner's name has not been shown as Pattadar. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that, such a receipt happened to be issued on account of a mistake. 3. Therefore, in the light of the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, I do not think it necessary to proceed with the contempt of court proceedings. On the other hand, I direct that, on the production of a copy of this judgment, the second respondent will revise Annexure-C receipt showing the name of the present pattadar and issue COC.1413/2010 : 2 : an appropriate receipt. With the above direction, this Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge