IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.27 of 2009 Tinku Kumar Versus The Chief Executive Officer,Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna & Ors ---------------------------------- 4. 19.8.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the Corporation and the learned counsel for the State are present. Learned counsel for the Corporation submits that the admissible dues have been paid to the petitioner. However, arrears of difference of pay and revision of pension would be payable as per the result of the appeal, vide L.P.A. No.960 of 2007 filed by the State, which is pending, as stated by the learned counsel for the State also. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)