IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2007 / 23RD SRAVANA 1929 RP.No. 743 of 2007(T) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4158/2005 Dated 19/07/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER : --------------------------------------- C.P.VENUGOPALAN, S/O. PADMANABHAN ACHARY, CHITHRANJALI, KOMALAMKUNNU, PUNALUR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- C.P.SARASWATHY, MADHAVA SADANAM, PUNALUR MURI, PUNALUR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. S. GOPAKUMARAN NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- R.P. No. 743 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C) No. 4158 OF 2005 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of August, 2007 O R D E R It is now clear that the counter claim which is permitted to be pursued under my judgment was not a counter claim against the plaintiff's claim. In fact it was a counter claim against the 5th defendant's claim. Such counter claims are not envisaged by Order VIII Rule 6 A. The Review Petition will stand allowed. My judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled. Post the Writ Petition for hearing. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2