IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1608 of 2007 DR.CHANDRIKA PRASAD VIDYARTHY Versus RENU DEVI ----------- 2 28.08.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner, a doctor employed in the Government of Bihar, cannot be heard to say that a sum of Rs. 2000/- by way of monthly maintenance to his wife and Rs. 1500/- for his two daughters is either excessive or illegal. The quantum of amount of maintenance in any way of the matter is neither shocking nor unreasonable and, therefore, considering the fact that the petitioner still has the liability to maintain his wife and two daughters this Court would not interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this application being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. The Court below is directed to ensure that both arrears and current amount so fixed by the impugned order must be realized from the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)