IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2011 / 8TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 33904 of 2003(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- DR.RAMANLAL P. PATEL, HAHNEMANN HOUSE, C.M.COLLEGE ROAD, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. R.S. SURESH KUMAR, USHAMALARI VEEDU NATTASSERY, S.H.MOUNT P.O. KOTTAYAM. 2. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, IDUKKI. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.M.MANOJ. BY ADV. SRI.H.B.SHENOY FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) NO.33904 OF 2003 EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 4.9.2000 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD DATED 16.7.2003 IN I.A.NO.65 OF 2000. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.521 OF 2003 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.521 OF 2003. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT GIVEN BY SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KSEB, CIVIL CIRCLE, PALLAM TO THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CARD ISSUED BY THE EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-1 TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 11.5.2011. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.33904 of 2003 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by the employer challenging Ext.P3 award passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki in I.D.No.65 of 2000. By that award, the Tribunal directed the petitioner to reinstate the workman in service with back wages and all other benefits. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.6.2011 to the effect that the subject matter of the dispute has been settled out of court by and between the parties as per the agreement dated 11.5.2011, a copy of which is produced as Annexure 1 along with the memo dated 10.6.2011 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the workman submitted that the workman has voluntarily entered into an agreement and settled the dispute out of court and in such circumstances, the writ petition may disposed of recording the agreement dated 11.5.2011 entered into between the parties. I accordingly dispose of the writ petition as settled out of court and with the observation that the rights of parties shall stand governed by the agreement dated 11.5.2011 in super cession of W.P.(C) No.33904 of 2003 2 Ext.P3 award. A copy of the agreement dated 11.5.2011 shall be appended to this judgment. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.