HR}?! CQURT OF CHHATI‘ISGAE AT BILASF’UR rit Petition . 181i} ofz E’ETETIONER M/s Shri Bhawam' Pmses, Thwugh: Its Peumer Naming Das Bhoota‘a, S/o Late Sin‘i Madan La} Ji Bhoo’ida, aged about 48 years, Registered Oi%ice at Chandrakhuri, District Burg (CG). VgRSQ§ RESPONDENTS . Central Bank of India A compzmy corporat¢, Constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 19703 Tm‘ough The Managing Diractor, Heaé Oliice at ChandramukhL Nariman P0111: Mumbai (Maharashtra). 2. The Reglonai Managei; Centrai Bank of india, Regionai Oince, Raipur (CG). 5 Branch Manager Centra} Bank of mdia, Branch Durg at Rungta Bhawan, GE Road, Durg, District CiiiiattiSgarh (CG). ' (WET PETITION UBEER AR'I'ICLE 226 OF 1HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) 3 iion’iile Mr. §atisi1 K. Aenihot J.) h‘esent : Shri Prateek Shanna with Shri RR. ?atankar, Advocates for the petitienei‘. None fer the respondents. {)RAL UR9E§§ (Pasaeii on 5'“ nay of December, 2%8) 1. The petitioner has prefen‘ed this “Tit petition on 20.03.2i‘108 against the notice éated 14.02.08 (Aimexure P/3), issued by the respondent Bank, under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security interest Act, 2002 (for short ”the Act 2002’), for recovery ot‘dues. . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition was iiied on the grountl' that no Presiding Otticer in Debts Recovery Tribunal I e W C No mig S: i ri. 3. It is brought to the notice ofthis Court that vide notification dated 12. 1 1 .2GO8 (Amlexm‘e-A), Shri Narenth'a Kumar, Prasiding Officer, Debts Recovery TribunaL Lucknow, has been authorized to discharge the functions ofPresiding Oiiicer, Debts Recovery Tribunai, Jabaipur, in addition to hi3 own charge, with immediate eifect. avg/vaWm » k\ ilas alreaciy prefen‘ed an {appeal and now the Presiding Oiiicer is avaiiabie to hear the matters at Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabaipur, this petition may be disposed ofwith Iiberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy. . Having heard learned counsei appearing for the parties and keeping in View of the facts that statutory appeai is availabie under the provisions of Section 17 of ' ' ’ W/htgam K‘ @MW w the Act 2002,1Vand further that thhas aiready iiied ari w ich is pending consideration before the DRT, Jahaipur, this petition is disposed of reserving iibeity to the petitioner to pursue the pending before the DRT, Jabalpur, for proper redressal/aétiudication ofthe matter. No order asto costs. 6. Consequentiy: pending appiications, it‘any, stands disposed of. I M . A? 0' ' h v k Sd/— Sahu mpeiyre piviwej MAW w’W’fULW m w ew‘wmf Ju9{w$ incwwplr‘qmé' ¥H¢qkje (so. (ii/1.12.,upg laugsr'd ih IVi’)‘(ja(V N3 ‘ Oi/ggpfj _ i‘\*xi \ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .7.”HV mhssx ,u V) H w gmLW/Ba’ri/K . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner A