IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9345 of 2009 Poonam Kumari, daughter of Shri Satyendra Narayan, resident of village- Ratan Sarai, P.O. Barauli, P.S. Barauli, District- Gopalganj, at present posted and working as a Panchayat Teacher in newly created Primary School, Kathari Bari, Anchal- Barauli-I, District- Gopalganj …………. Petitioner. Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 4.The Director, Research and Training, Bihar, Patna 5.The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division at Chapra 6.The District Magistrate, Gopalganj 7.The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chairman, the District Education Establishment Committee, Gopalganj 8.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division at Chapra 9.The District Superintendent of Education, Gopalganj 10.The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj 11.The Block Development Officer, Barauli, District- Gopalganj 12.The Block Education Extension Officer, Barauli-I, District- Gopalganj 13.The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Batardeh, Block- Barauli, District- Gopalganj 14.The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Batardeh, Block- Barauli, District- Gopalganj ………… Respondents. ----------- 3. 20/08/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is 2 available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their employment. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of her grievances. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner within one month, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed therewith, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced, and other relevant records and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)