IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 127 of 2008 Uttarakhand Kranti Dal and another. …Petitioners. Versus Delimitation Commission of India and others. …Respondents. Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. T.S. Phartyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Farida Siddiqui, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. J.P. Joshi and Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocates for respondent no. 5. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the jurisdictional bar contained in Article 329 of the Constitution of India, he does not wish to pursue the instant writ petition further. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 28.4.2010 Rathour