[ 263s ] TN THII HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOTJRABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR IA No. I OF 2002(WPMP.No.30218 of 2002) IN WP NO: 10321OF 1997 M/S./Hyderabad Engineering Industries (USHA) HYD Between: AND Counsel for the Petitioner : Counsel for the Responde nts: ...Petitioner/Petitioner M S R SUBRAHMANYAM SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDTA) 1. The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Balanagar Mandal, Hyderabad, Rangareddy District. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar Mandal, Ranagareddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Domalguda, Hyderabad. 4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. (Respondent No.4 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 31.10.2023 Vide IA.No.l of 2013 (wP.MP.No.8311 of 2013) in WP No.10321 of 1997) ...Respondents/Respondents Petition Under Section 151 of CPC, the High Coua may be pleased to direct the respondents to return Rs.Two lakhs deposited by the petitioner on2710611gg7 with the 2"d respondent in pursuance of the orders of the Fligh Court dated:06.05.97 in W.P.M.P.12525197 in W.P.No.l032ll97 consequent on the allowing of the above Writ Petition by the Honble I-{iglr Court, Pending disposal of WP No. 10321 of 1997, on the file of the High Court The court rvhile directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why tiris application sl-rould not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt o1' notice in the case). The Court made the fbllowing ORDER Mr. Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the respondents. The writ petition namely W.P.No.1032l of 1997 is filed challenging the destraint order dated 03.05.1997 against the petitioner issued by Mandal Revenue Inspector, Balanagar Mandal under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864. The writ petition is allowed by a Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 21.06.2001, In compliance of the interim order dated 06.05.1997 passed in W.P.No.10321 of 1997, the petitioner claims to have deposited a sum of Rs.2.00 lakhs. By means of I.A.No.1 of 2002 (WPMP.No.30218 of 2002), the petitioner seeks refund of an amount of Rs.2.00 lakhs. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In case the petitioner has deposited a sum 9f Rs.2.00 lakhs in compliance of the interim order dated 06.05.1997 passed in W.P.No.lO32l of L997, the same shall be refunded to the petitioner on verification. Accordingly, I.A.No.l of 2002 (WPMP.No.3O218 of 2002) is allowed. //TRUE COPYII StY. K. VENKAIAI{ A,S S tSTAtii REG ts,*RAR I SECTIO16FFICER To, 1. The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Balanagar Mandal, Hyderabad, Rangareddy District. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar Mandal, Ranagareddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Chevella Division, Domalguda, Hyderabad. 4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. (1 to 4 By RPAD) 5. One CC to SRL M S R SUBRAHMANYAM Advocate IOPUC] 6. One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR(DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF rNDrA) [OPUCI 7. One spare copy HIGH COURT HCJ AND NVSKJ DATED:31 11012023 ORDEI]. IA No. I OF 2002(WPMP,No.30218 of 2002) IN WP NO: 10321OF 199? -t.+\TE Or \rl.- LLL ( { L -) ;1 \\ q cJ 1\11 \$\ t .t- /! lir:) r' r' DIRECTION