CWP No.14948 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.14948 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.08.2010 **** Nishat & Malwa Bus Pvt. Ltd. . . . . Petitioner VS. Secretary, RTA Jalandhar . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. PS Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. Mr. H.S. Brar, learned Addl. AG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file their counter-reply at this stage. (2). The petitioner who is running transport business and is operating on Amritsar – Gurdaspur via Derababa Nanak, Kalanaur route, seeks a direction to the respondents to provide it equal frequency, margin and proper running timings in the Time Table (Annexure P2) on Gurdaspur - Kalanaur route. CWP No.14948 of 2010.doc - 2 – (3). In this regard the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities on 12.08.2010 (Annexure P3) but there is no response thereto so far. (4). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views in relation thereto, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 12.08.2010 (Annexure P3) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (5). Ordered accordingly. (6). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 20.08.2010 vishal shonkar