IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 3719 of 2008 Decided on: 18.08.2010 Darshan Singh Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioner has already made a representation to the competent authority vide Annexure A/9 dated 30.04.1996 for the redressal of his grievance. However, the same has not been decided by the Commissioner -cum-Secretary, Labour and Employment Government of Himachal Pradesh. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner -cum- Secretary, Labour and Employment Government of Himachal Pradesh to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 30.04.1996 by assigning cogent reasons, within a period of 10 weeks from the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- date of production of certified copy of this judgment. In case the representation is accepted, the petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 18, 2010 (K. Attri)