IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4197 of 2008 1. RAMADHIN SAHNI, SON OF LATE SHIV NANDAN SAHNI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE—DHARHARA, P.S. ANDHRAMATH DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. 2. THAKAI MUKHIA SON OF LATE BHULLAR MUKHIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KARIOUT, P.S. LAUKAHI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI (BIHAR) …. PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, CO- OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DARBHANGA COMMISSIONARY, DARBHANGA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATRE, MADHUBANI. 5. THE DISTRICT C0-OPERATIVE SOCIETY EXTENSION OFFICER, MADHUBANI. 6. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES-CUM-CONDUCTING OFFICER, JHANGHARPUR CIRCLE, JHANJHARPUR, MADHUBANI. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, LAUKAHI, MADHUBANI. 8. THE CO-OPERATIVE EXTENSION OFFICER, LAUKAHI, MADHUBANI. 9. CO-OPERATIVE EXTENSION OFFICER, KHUTOWNA-CUM- RETURNING OFFICER, LAUKAHI, MADHUBANI. … RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 09.12.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and the counsel for the Intervener, Ram Balak Mukhiya. 2. Petitioner assailed the result of the election held for constituting the management committee of Laukahi Fisherman Co-operative Societies Ltd. held on 20.01.2008. The election dispute was considered by the District Co-operative Officer against whose order matter was taken in appeal vide Election Case no. 109 of 2008 which was disposed of under orders dated 2 13.8.2010/31.8.2010. Against the aforesaid order dated 13.8.2010/31.8.2010 intervenor Ram Balak Mukhiya filed a review petition which is still pending but till date no interim order has been passed in the said review so submitted Sri Rakesh Kumar Jha counsel for Ram Balak Mukhiya. When such order was recorded Sri Jha went through his file and came out with an order dated 7.10.2010, whereunder the order dated 13.8.2010/31.8.2010 has been put in abeyance. Aforesaid casual conduct of Sri Jha is not to be appreciated by this Court however, taking a lenient view of the matter no further action is taken against him. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid order dated 7.10.2010 putting the order dated 13.8.2010/31.8.2010 in abeyance has been passed on account of the pendency of the writ petition. The writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn directing the authority before whom the review matter is pending to proceed with the matter and to dispose of the same in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ibrar/- (V.N. Sinha, J.)