a a is= i i cs=a s - ^^•j;=ii.a 3 ??ns== ^=^.c= i 6 S E=^.i=i:% A S^E s B:Eb S= A =^= ==^ Si .^ Sn THE HIGH COURT Or ,»}UOICATURtA.TBiLA! f*. es M^- "?nna i^i;yi^^= SINGtE BENCH .-A^*., out of dt.1'ZQ7.2005 itusisce ann 1=B^^= •iaau "».r.r< TO) PETfTJONER M/s Siddeswar Rice Mill, Gram Aghanpui'Jagadalpur, a partnership nmi, throuqh its Partner Dhani Ram ^ao S!o Safc Babu Lai Sao, occupafion business, Rlo Main Road, Jagadalpur, Distt. Bastar(M.P.) _ ^ 1> 7../-^v' / <y^' ^••"^Q.^' ..-•• ^i^3i§{%··""" ^:>'\\'>'/< ^.••"J •y, ^^"^ ' ^/A'.-^ .,. /»OA^"' '3) ^^^Yy ;t ^\.--' ^•"" G^$»' \0^- .4'1 Superintending Engineer (O&M). Madhva Pradesh Electricitv Board. J303 U^ IpUF; Junior fcnginesr (KuraS/Utiarampur3i Mauhya Pradesh Electridty Board, Jaijadalpur, Exec.t.rtive Engineer, Macihya Pradesh Lieclncrt'y' Board, uagadalpur, 1 ansiiaar, 'M.P.) Jaaadalour Disfrict i@s= fE-'°^^s^c=ii j-t>=ys^a-,ei.s y^T° ^=<t.^5-°h-Bs^e ^ l ias"T!ss RESTORATION OF ORIGiNA'l. WRT 'Bt-l. ISUt 10 0 .S^Sass%. .//^^ \ j ^aS^, | ^. ':<!-'^..y /-^ /,.^^.5^ift [.^;^{f ^ mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WI.C.C.No.147of2005 DB : HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA.J & HON'BLE SHRI T.P.SHARIVIA.J. APPLICANT M/s. Siddeswar Rice Mill, Gram Aghanpur Jagadalpur, a partnership firm, through its Partner Dhani Ram Sao, S/o late Babu Lal Sao, occupation b.usiness, R/o Main Road, Jagadalpur, District Bastar (M.P.) NON- APPLICANTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Versus Superintending Engineer(0 & M), Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Jagadalpur Junior Engineer (Rural/Dharampura) Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Jagadalpur Executive Pradesh Jagadalpur Engineer, Electricity Madhya Board, Tahsildar, Jagadalpur, District Bastar (M.P.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL WRIT PETITION N0.150/1995 Presence: Shri Vishnu Koshta and Shri N.P. Koshta, Counsel for the applicant. Shri A.S. Gaharwar, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1, 2 & 3. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.4. M.C.C.No.147/2005 ORAL ORDER (13.10.2008) The following order of the court was passed by SUJTJI Kumar Sinha, J. shyna Heard. This MCC has been filed for restoration of W.P. No. 150/1995, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide orderdated 12/7/2005. On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the applicant has shown sufficient cause for its non-representation on 12/7/2005, when W.P. No.150/1995 was taken up for hearing. In the result, the MCC is allowed and W.P. No.150/1995 is restored to its original number. ———— __. Sd/- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge T. P.5harma