IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 18TH MAGHA 1929 CRP.No. 999 of 2007 --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09/11/2007 IN IA 248/2007 IN WOS.26/2007 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: (PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF): ----------------------------------------------------------------- RAHMANIYA JUMA MASJID MAHALLU COMMITTEE, NAMBIAPURAM, KOCHI-6, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENTS: (RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS): ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.P. SAJID, RETURNING OFFICER, ADVOCATE, M/S. KHALID & PANICKER, M.M. ROAD, KOCHI-682 014. 2. THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, WAKF BOARD OFFICE, V.I.P. ROAD, KALOOR P.O., KOCHI-682 017. 3. P.B. AZEEZ, PORATHIKKASSERI VEEDU, NAMBIAPURAM, PALLURUTHY. *4. I.ASHRAFF, PEEDIKAPARAMBIL, PULLARDESOM ROAD, COCHIN- 682006. 5. A.K. NAZAR, ARIKKANATU PARAMBU, NAMBIAPURAM, PALLURUTHY, COCHIN- 682006. 6. MOHAMMED AZEEZ, 19/1748-A, PALATHINKAL HOUSE, PIPE LINE ROAD, PALLURUTHI, COCHIN- 682006. C.R.P NO. 999/2007 7. K.S. ABOOBACKER, 18/875, KARIMPANAKKAL HOUSE, NAMBIAPURAM, PALLURUTHI, COCHIN- 682006. 8. M.B. KHALID, 19/1747, NAMBIPUNNILATH HOUSE, PIPLE LINE ROAD, PALLURUTHI, COCHIN- 682006. *ADDL. R4 TO R8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 07/02/2008 IN IA NO. 2857/2007. BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ,CAVEATOR THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/02/2008, ALONG WITH CRP NO. 1006 OF 2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & K.HEMA, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- C.R.P.Nos.999 & 1006 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------- Dated 7th February, 2008 JUDGMENT Koshy,J . In these two revision petitions, the petitioners are challenging interim orders passed by the Wakf Tribunal. It is submitted by the respondents that election was over and they took charge of the office. In the above circumstances, we direct the Tribunal to dispose of the suit itself as expeditiously as possible, untrammelled by the findings in the interim orders. The suit should be disposed of if possible within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Both parties shall co-operate for an early disposal of the case. The revision petitions are disposed of accordingly. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE K.HEMA JUDGE tks