1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6823 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr.Bharat Khanna for the petitioner. Mr.R.D.Soni i/by M/s.Ram & Co for the respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 11th September 2009. P.C.: . By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who is a tenant has challenged an order passed by the trial Court of appointing a Court Commissioner for local investigation in exercise of powers under Rule 9 of Order XXVI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. the order is purely interlocutory in nature. Moreover, the report of the Court Commissioner is never final in the sense that the parties can always file objections to the report of the Court Commissioner and can apply to the Court for permission to cross-examine Court Commissioner. Hence, no case is made out in writ jurisdiction. By keeping all the contentions of the petitioner open, petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)