IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.180 of 2010 MOHAMMAD FAZLUR RAHMAN S/O LATE ABDUL SHAKOOR R/O MOH- BARAHPURA, P.O. BHAGALPUR, P.S. KOTWALI THANA, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT ANIS MAZHAR APARTMENT, SAPNA-3, X-G, NAYA TOLA, BARI PATH, P.S. PIRBAHORE, DISTT. PATNA Versus 1. THE B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY MADHEPURA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, NAMELY KUMARESH PRASAD SINGH S/O NOT KNOWN 2. SHREE RIPUSUDAN PRASAD SRIVASTAVA S/O NOT KNOWN THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA 3. SHREE KUMARESH PRASAD SINGH S/O NOT KNOWN THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA 4. SHREE RAJ KISHORE PRASAD SINGH S/O NOT KNOWN THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY DEPTT. OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA NAMELY.. 6. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, S/O NOT KNOWN 7. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY DHANANJAY KUMAR ----------- 7 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the University as also the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the University stating therein that the admitted dues have been paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arrears of pension on the revised scale w.e.f. 01.04.1997 have been paid, however details have not been provided. It is further submitted that the revision of pension admissible w.e.f. 01.04.2007 has not been extended. Learned counsel for the University submits that since the order has been complied with this contempt application need not proceed further. Considering the submissions of the parties, since - 2 - the order of the Court has been complied with the contempt application need not proceed further. However, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the Registrar of the University with regard to the left out grievances including the claim for supplying the details of arrears of pension paid to her on account of revision w.e.f. 01.04.1997, the claim for subsequent revision of pension w.e.f. 01.01.2006 the monetary benefit of which is admissible w.e.f. 01.04.2007, the claim for payment of family pension to the legal heirs and the claim for payment of interest on delayed payment as also the claim for merger of fifty percent of dearness relief into his basic pension. The contempt application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)