SM 1 917.wp.1881.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1881 OF 2011 Mrs. Sushila Dilip Satre ....Petitioner Versus The Central Bank of India and others ....Respondents ____________ None present for the Parties. CORAM: DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD & A. A. SAYED, J.J. DATED : AUGUST 20, 2011. P.C.: The essential challenge on behalf of the Petitioner is to notices issued under Section 13 (2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act and the measures taken by the bank under Section 13 (4) of the Act. A remedy is available under Section 17 of the Act to every person aggrieved. The Petitioner would be at liberty to pursue that remedy. 2. The Petition is accordingly dismissed. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)