Civil Revision No.4628 of 2003 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4628 of 2003 (O&M) Decided on : 9-09-2009 Sushil Kumar .... Petitioner VERSUS Hookam Chand & another .... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL. Present:- Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J (Oral). The petitioner (plaintiff) has filed the instant revision petition against orders dated 24.01.2003 and 25.8.2003 (Annexures P-1 and P-4) respectively passed by both the Courts below, whereby his application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of C.P.C. for ad-interim injunction, has been dismissed. While issuing notice of motion on 9.10.2003, the status quo with regard to the tube-well was ordered to be maintained. When on May 3, 2004, this revision petition was admitted, the interim order dated 9.10.2003 was ordered to continue till further orders. Counsel for the petitioner has informed that the main suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed by the Trial Court. Civil Revision No.4628 of 2003 (O&M) -2- In view of the aforesaid facts, this revision petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. 9th September, 2009. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) Monika JUDGE