1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.953 OF 2008 AND STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO.3075 OF 2008. 1. Sanyogita Rane and 4 others.. Applicants. Versus 1. Smt. Manoramabai Rauji Rane (deceased) through L.Rs. .. Respondents. Mr. S. G. Bhobe, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S. Vehidulla, Advocate for the respondent Nos.5(II)(A) and 5(II)(B). Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 10(A) to 10(D), 11,12, 13(A) to 13(D), 14 to 18. Coram :- C. L. PANGARKAR , J. Date : - 20 th January, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard the Counsel for the applicants and the respondents. This application has been filed for substitution of the L.Rs. of the respondent No.7(ii), who said to have died. It is the contention of the applicants that the applicants came to know of the death of the respondent No.7(ii) when the Counsel for the respondent No.2 informed the applicants of the death of the respondent No.7(ii). Immediately, thereafter, this application for substitution of L.Rs. of the 2 deceased respondent was moved. It is contended in the said application that the L.Rs. of the respondent No.7(ii) is already on record and other heirs alone ordered to be brought on record. There is delay in preferring the application, which the applicants seek to condone. In view of the fact that the applicants came to know of the death of the respondent No.7(ii) upon information given by the Advocate for the respondent No.2, the delay in filing the application for bringing the L.Rs. on record, stands condoned. The abatement, if any, stands set aside. The L.Rs. be brought on record. The appeal memo be amended. Thereafter, notices be issued to the L.Rs. of deceased respondent returnable on 10/02/2009. 2. The applications are disposed of. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA