IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22090 of 2010 DR.CHETAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sasaram (Tilauthu) P.S. No. 302 of 2010 for offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 467,468,471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner who is a Government doctor is that under a Janani Bal Surakhsha Yojana, each pregnant woman who delivers a child in a Government hospital is entitled to a sum of Rs. 1400/-. It is alleged that this accused and other accused persons made some fake entries in the register in relation to ladies whose delivery never took place in the hospital, giving rise to the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner himself upon gathering information of such irregularities had brought the fact to the notice of the District 2 Magistrate vide letter dated 18.3.2010 but the committee constituted in this regard implicated the petitioner himself and some others. He further submits that a perusal of the statement of allegation shows that the amount was never transferred and remained in the Government treasury. He further submits that the petitioner has recently joined service in the Government hospital and having a clean antecedent, he has remained in custody since 13.5.2010. Taking into consideration and the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner namely, Dr. Chetan Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Tilauthu) P.S. case No. 302 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (1) that the father of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors. (2) that the petitioner would be attending the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case 3 and failure on his part to attend the Court on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below would confer liberty to the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)