IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3061 of 2011 CHANDAN @ FONU CHAUDHARY SON OF SHRI BUTTU ALIAS BANARSI CHAUDHARY. --------- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 09.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsels for both sides, on instructions, submit that they are ready to resume the conjugal life. However, learned counsel for the complainant submits that, in the restitution case, when the complainant appeared, the petitioner stopped appearing in the case, which shows the malicious intention of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 346/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below accept the bail bond of the petitioner provisionally when the petitioner and complainant will appear before the learned court below on 28th of March 2011. Let the learned court below monitor the conduct of the petitioner for six months. When the learned court below will be satisfied that the matrimonial harmony has been substantially restored, the bail bond of the petitioner will be finally accepted. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)