IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 2259 of 2005 Shri Dhondiram Ramdas Purkar ..Petitioner vs. 1. Union of India and anr. ..Respondents Ms.P.P.Tendulkar i/b Shri S.S.Kankera for petitioner Smt.Neeta Masurekar for respondent no.1. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. 28th June, 2005 28th June, 2005 28th June, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The petitioner went on medical leave from 18th December, 2002 to 25th February, 2003. As there was no leave (E.L., medical leave etc.) to his credit he wanted to treat the said leave period as EOL. However, rule 32(2), copy of which is annexed at page 40 of the petition provides that EOL cannot run concurrently with the notice period of voluntary retirement. As the petitioner had already applied for voluntary retirement he was not entitled to EOL. 2. Petition is dismissed.