IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 WA.No. 788 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.26062/2007 Dated 12/11/2008 .................... APPELLANTS: RESPONDENT ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, O/O.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.M.R.SREELATHA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. M.K.PRASANNA, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY,PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 2. M.MOHANAKRISHNAN, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY, PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 3. M.K.SATHEESAN, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY, PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 4. REENA, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY,PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. W.A.No.788/2009 5. DR.ASHA K., LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY, PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 6. MEENA SHANKER, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY, PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 7. NISHA NAMBIAR, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY, PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 8. THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 9. THE MANAGER, N.S.S.COLLEGES, (SECRETARY, N.S.S.COLLEGES CENTRAL COMMITTEE, CHANGANACHERRY). 10. THE PRINCIPAL, PAZHASSIRAJA N.S.S.COLLEGE, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. ADV. SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY FOR R8 SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI FOR R5 SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN FOR R1 TO R3, R6 AND R7 SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN FOR R4 SRI.P.GOPAL FOR R9 & R10 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ------------------------------ W.A.No.788 of 2009 ------------------------------ Dated this, the 11th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. Going by the grounds raised in the appeal, we notice that most of the relevant grounds now placed before us were not raised or argued before the learned Single Judge. We cannot find fault with the judgment of the learned Single Judge for not considering the points which were never urged at the time of hearing. Going by the judgment, we are of the view that many relevant points, including the directions of the Division Bench in W.A. No.308 of 2008, were not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge. In view of the above position, we feel that the remedy of the appellants, if they are aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge is, to seek a review of the said judgment. Without prejudice to the contentions of the appellants and their right to move the learned Single Judge for reviewing the judgment, this appeal is dismissed. Sd/- K. Balakrishnan Nair, Judge. Sd/- C.T. Ravikumar, Judge. DK. (True copy)