FAO No.1835 of 2005 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: 7.9.2006 National Insurance Company Ltd. ...Appellant versus Sarabjit Kaur and others ... Respondents CORAM:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Nath Singh. Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mahesh Grover. Present: Mr.Inderjit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.P.S.Brar, Advocate. Mr.Nonesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. UMA NATH SINGH, J. (ORAL) This order shall also dispose of connected FAO No.1836 of 2005. In both the appeals by the Insurance Company, the only point canvassed by learned counsel for the appellant is that there is a misreading of evidence in respect of validity of the original driving licence. We have carefully examined para 13 of the award so also cross- examination of Mahesh Kumar, Clerk, DTO Office, Faridkot. We find that the said witness has categorically stated in the cross-examination that the DTO, Faridkot, has only renewed the licence and further before renewal of the licence, requisite notice was issued to the authority, which had issued the original licence. Therefore, we do not find any material to hold that FAO No.1835 of 2005 2 there is a misreading of evidence. Hence, both the appeals, being devoid of merits, are, hereby, dismissed. ( UMA NATH SINGH ) JUDGE September 7, 2006 ( MAHESH GROVER ) pk JUDGE