IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15617 of 2010 MD.AZAD @ MD.AZAD KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 08.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 7.7.2010 in a case registered under Sections 394, 307 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner name sprang up during confession of co-accused and there is no recovery from the petitioner. Apart from the present one the petitioner is involved in two other cases out of which one was registered in pursuance to the occurrence of the present case itself. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner’s name has sprang up in the confession of co-accused but the petitioner was not caught on the spot. Considering the aforesaid submission of the petitioner, since the petitioner was not caught on the spot, there is no recovery from the petitioner and no T.I. Parade has been held, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Azad @ Md. Azad Khan be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 178 of 2008 . It is made clear that the petitioner will appear regularly during the trial and if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates or if the petitioner gets involved in any other case of similar nature, the trial Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)