IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4545 of 2010 1. SHOBHA DEVI, DAUGHTER OF SRI RAJESHWAR SINGH 2. DULUL DEVI @ DUDULL DEVI, WIFE OF RAJESHWAR SINGH. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366A, 120B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the Complaint was instituted four days after the occurrence wherein it has been stated that the petitioners are neighbours and they were on good terms with the alleged victim. There appears to be overtones of a relationship which has not been explained either by the Complainant or by the victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are ladies and are in custody since 15.12.2009, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 174 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as 2 to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)