IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7793 of 2009 Date of decision : May 10, 2010 Attar Singh ....Petitioner versus Manoj Malik and another ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. SP Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate, for respondent no. 1 Mr. Jagjit Beniwal, Advocate, for respondent no. 2 L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has got released vehicle in question on sapurdari in criminal case. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 states that sapurdari has been obtained by petitioner by concealing material facts. However, respondent no. 2 is at liberty to avail any remedy available in accordance with law to challenge the sapurdari order but it has no relevance in the instant revision petition. I am not expressing any opinion regarding merits of sapurdari order because the same is not in issue in this revision petition. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already received the vehicle in question on sapurdari, nothing survives to be determined in the instant revision petition which is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( L.N. Mittal ) May 10, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'