<^p ^-s^z__ ^rn^ p ^yy^y s' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION IS\ No.ya^4^ /2010 PETITIONERS ^^ ^f/ ^yyy ^y \ y^o /\^ . CM^y ^w ^ ./'y RESPONDENTS: Narayan Prasad Sahu S/o Maniram Sahu aged about 56 Years Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Tanoud (Middle Depot) Block — Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Ratan Lal Tilakchand about 56 Years Division Teacher, Higher Secondary Tanoud (Middle Tondan S/o Tondan aged Upper Govt. School Depot) Block - Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) ^ 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) . 3. Block Education Officer, Block - Pamgarh District Jamjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 2JO HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinate Bench: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. V. PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON UNI WRIT PETITION IS} N0.3345^010 Narayan Prasad Sahu and Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others E CONSn-UTION OF INDIA Present: - Shri Ashwani Shukla, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for ttie State. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th July, 2010) The petitioners were initialty appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed psy of Rs.100/-. After completion of their probation period, they were granted regular pay scale of Rs.169-300/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the p^itioners submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from tfie date of initial appointment or after comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by ttie Madhya Pradesh Stete Admjnistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yauhi and 56 Offfers v. Stsrte ofM.P. & ottiers), wherein it was held ftat ttie similariy situated teachers are entiUed to regutar pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court uphoklmg the decisfon of the Tribunal to ttie effect ttiat the Teachers/Assistant Teachere are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of injtial appointment. ,f':X ^f ^ jII ^^^^^^ § / / ^ '^^/ ''^^^^ ^.\ ^- 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners further sutwnits ttat ttiis Court. while considering the same issue in Amar Saf Ram & Ottiers v. State of ChhaWsgarh & Off»ers. W.P.(S).No.4725/2006. by order dated 01-09-2006. allowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising all the grievances. 5. Accordingly. the petitioners are granted Mberty to make a representation raising all their grievances in light of ttie aforestated judynent and the circutar dated 13-01-2009 (Annexure P-2) and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide (he representations, if any, in accordance with law. on its own merits, within a period of eight weeks' from the date of receipt of ttie representation, subject to verification of the facts. 6. In view of the foregoing. this petMion is disposed of. No orcter as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Tumane