IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11061 of 2011 MITHILESH KUMAR, SON OF SRI RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 19.04.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is husband of the informant. Although, very wild allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and matrimonial suit is also pending between the parties but in course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the informant pointed out that a chance for rehabilitation should be given to the parties. In view of the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No. 162 of 2006. It is made clear that after release of the petitioner from judicial custody, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh shall issue a notice to the petitioner as well as informant fixing a date for reconciliation and shall also take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties. If learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh fails in his attempt on account of rigid approach of the petitioner, he may cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner but if the informant 2 creates hurdle in reconciliation proceeding in that event, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh shall drop the reconciliation proceeding and shall proceed with the case without cancelling the bail bonds of the petitioner. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )