:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2245 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2890 OF 2003 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Machchindra A. Patil, Adv. for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 29TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. This Writ petition is placed before me because the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks leave to amend to correct the address of the Respondent nos.1 and 2. However, Mr.Patil in all fairness states that the order under challenge in this Writ petition is capable of being impugned in Revisional :2: :2: :2: jurisdiction of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai. Such a Revision Application is already filed, but, in the meanwhile the Tribunal was abolished. Now, it is reconstituted. Therefore the Revision Application being pending and now the Tribunal being reconstituted, the petitioner does not wish to press this petition. However, the interim order granted by this court to continue, so as to enable the petitioner to move the Revisional Authority. 2. In the result, although the Writ petition is not admitted and some of the Respondents have filed their Vakalatnama, since the petition itself is not pressed, there is no reason to issue any notice to them. Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. However,the ad-interim order granted to continue for a period of four weeks to enable the petitioner to apply for appropriate reliefs in the pending Revision Application. :3: :3: :3: ********