KL: r1 A ^f:i€JO^ ll^LIHE HJGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) (2) PETITIONER z^ y ^.y^ / '^.^ ^^" N,' .<j" ^^ v</'^ RESPONDENTS --^ ^'rS' _^'^^ \^°. o^'- >A%. w ^f"^^'ff ff ^-^--< -••ff^ "c^^^yy '%£l!'^^' ''"-sass's'^ W.P.tNO.-T/'^ /2006 ^- Itwari Lal Ajgale ^ Aged about 61years , S/o. Shri Sadhram Ajgale /' _. ^ . Block Education Officer, Gharghoda, Block-Gharghoda, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh. Through - the Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector -• Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner^ Tribal Welfare Department Raigarh (C.G.) 4. D.P. Chaudhari ^ Acting Principal Government Higher Middle School Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 1 H •- K m WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA HlGtt CQURT OP eHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 5167 <rf2006 Petitioner Itwari Lal Ajgate Vcrsus Respoudents Tlie State ol'Chhattisgarh & ofhers SB; Hon'bte Mr. Justfce Satish K. Agnlhtttart, J Shri Raghvcndra Pradhaa, Advocate for thc pctitioncr. Shri Suslul Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3. None forthe respondent No.4. Thakur ORDER ( Passcd on this 13& day ofFchniaiy, 2007) The following order ofthe Court is passed by SaUsh K. Agnlhotet, J. 1. Learaed counsel appearing for fhe petituner submits fhat fhe iinpugued order dated 31.8.2006 (Annexure P/l) was not passcd in accordance with fhe transfer poHcy, whereia it is providcd fhat duiiag the ban period jf auy transfer onlcr is passed, fhe same should be done in coordination wifh the Chief Minister. 2. Shri Sushfl Dubey, leamed Govt. Advocate fairty concedes and submits that this oider was not passed in coordiaatton with the Chief Minister, fhus it is conteaiy to the tiansfer policy. 3. Accordiagty, ia wew of tiue submissions made herein above, the petition is allowed arul the toaasfer order dated 31.8.2006 is quashjed. However, fhe respondents/State is at liberty to pass appiopriate order, in pubtic interest on account of administrative exigency, if so found. No oider as to costs. Certified copy, as per Rutes. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge