('O'O) jndqsBp-'nsiQ 'jndqsBp ?uaur)JBdaa 'ajsjpf^ lequj, .[SUOlSSItUIUOO ^UB^SISSV ('O'O) Jndrea 'UBABqg •S-a-a ^uauEtJBdsd sjBjia^ TBquj, 'Are;3J3ag sqj, -: qSnojqj, qjBSsp^qqojo aya^Q •e SANaaNOdsaa sasuaA (•0-3) mdqsBp --^SIQ 'sqoiS'eg 'poqag Arepuoosg jsqgiH St^og '(JSjniogq) 'SJBS/' gg ^noqa paSa 'reg uegig aysq o/s 'msfBvii reg ireiping •z (•0-0) jndqssp- '^SIQ 'uovSfTBVftvpBd -5{30{g 'fev[eq3vQ '{ooqog siPPm sj-"0 'TAOQ •IM-H 'sjBsA; 8S ^noq'B psS® '®3pI3 urey aqgoy o/g 'B3p[g ire^ng •^ ^. .^'.•^' ,..^^:<^c x^^-r' xx^d%.-·^< ^^y ^^ ^ saauouuad 600C7 QQ^<^ 'ONlsl'd'A an«[sv^Iaj,v HHVOSIJJLVHHO d6 AHaOO HOIH sna.NOH aHA N1 ^ 't'^ff-z ^) •f 3. <^Bloek Edueation Officer Paththalgaon/Bagicha Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 4. F'rincipal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bagicha, ^ Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 5. Treasury, Account & Pension Jashpi.iT, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA. iB ^: i.ifc HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BDLASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 6400 of2009 PETTTIO RS RESPQ^7DENTS Bulkan Ekka & another. VERSUS State ofChhattissarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OT THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB; Hon'ble ShriSatishK. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Venna with Shri Akshay Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govenunent Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 06* day of November, 2009) With the consent of leamsd eounsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finallv. • 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners subsaits that the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 100/- on probstion. After completion of their probation period, the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. Leamed eounsel furtfaer submits that the isgue involved in the case is asto whether the petitionsrs are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date ofinitial appointment or after eompletion ofprobation period. 2. The issus involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admuustrative Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short "the SAT"} in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadii.and 56 others vs. State ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e./ fhe date of initial appointment. Ths matter was taken up to the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court, upholding the decigioa ofthe Tribuaal to the effeet that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale fi-om date of initial appointment. 3. In view of the above submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ t^ition is disposed of in the same tenns i.e., ths petitioner is granted liberty to maice a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitioners' case, if the petitioners stand on the same footings as per order passed by the SAT in Madhvkant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petirion (Civil) No. 6892/93 by order dated 3-1-1994 and grant relisfaceorduigly. - 4. Inviewofforegomg,thewritpetitionisdisposedof. - \ SatisbK.Ag«"h°trl