IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28173 of 2008 GULAB GIRI Versus SATTE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Section 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the petitioner is named accused, upon investigation petitioner was not charge sheeted. However, the Chief Judicial Magistrate found prima facie case against the petitioner and took cognizance. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further drawn attention of the court to the document contained in Annexure-2 which is said to be the supervision note. However, it is not explained as to how the supervision note is in possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the state, on the other hand, submits that it is not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Considering the above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)