spb/ 1 ca4875-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4875 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.)NO. 31617 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. P.G. Lad for the Applicant/ Petitioner. None for the Respondents. --- CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2011 P.C.:- 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. 2 This is an application for condonation of delay. The appeal is barred by limitation. It is filed after 342 days, that is after expiration of the period of limitation. The reason given in the application is not satisfactory. In paragraph 2 of the application it is stated that the order dated 3rd October, 2009 was communicated by spb/ 2 ca4875-10 the Advocate in the trial court and thereafter, the papers books were sent to the Advocate in High Court for filing the appeal memo. Thereafter vague allegation is made that certain proceedings were missing and hence, Advocate in the High Court raised certain queries which were not complied with. The averment even if accepted at its face value it is too vague. It does not make sufficient ground for condonation of the delay. 3 The application is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)