GARH BILA3PUR HIGH COURT OF CHI-IAT'HS Writ Petition S E9, 7556 of Z007 PETX‘HONERS 1 Smt. Bhagwam, Sushila Agad about Bai, 45 Win years, Shri Rf o Village Arand, P.O. Basin, Tahsil Rajim, Dis’m’ct Raipur {CG} 2. Tukamm Vadu (Vadavx Sic Late Yogeshwan' Sahu Aged about‘ 42 years, R{o Goverdhan Para, Rajim, District Raipur (CG) Versus State of Chha’rtisgarh, Thrnngh. the Secretary, Elblic Woxks Department, Public. Work3 D€partment, Mantralaya, D.K.S‘ Bhaww, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 2 Engineer-in—Chief, Public v Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Executive Exxgineer, Public Works Departmam, Raipur (C133 4 Sub-DiviSiona] (micer, PubHc Works Deliartment, Sub—Division Rajim Raipur{C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IRDIA Aggearance: Shri Pradecp Singh, Panel Laywcr for the State] Shri RR. Pali, cmmsd for the. petitioners. respondents: ORAL 012mm (20. 1?..2037) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA: J. Heard. stitioners submits that. a red at the aga of 62 years in bEarned counsel for - the p permanent Gangvman i3 to be reti accordancewith the Chhattisgarh Simskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki— Fundamental RHIES, 56. He a1$o snbmits that the yoirit raised has been decided hy this Cmut in 108,!2005 and many nther c61inected Ayu) Adhiniyam 1 967 read With // V f t \i/ ‘ hatch matters of on matters 04.013007, Le. W.P.Nn. reported in 2007 (2) c.G.L.J. 29 Iamm x \ WP(S) No. 7556/2007 a; athers Vs. State of C.G.) and this matmr is squarejy covered by that decision, which may be disposed ofon the same terms. Ixmnled counsel for the State. fairly agmas that fhis mattar is covared by tha said decision. Howevar; he submits fhat in soma matters the State has filed Writ appcam. UnleSS some interim onier is passed, mash; (m account of filing of the writ appeal; lmaring of this writ patitjon cannot he kept in abeyancm whan the matter is Squamly covcmd hy fhe said jud gment. In the msuh‘, this petition is anowed, It is disposed of in terms 0f the order dated G4.1.2GQ7 passed in W.P. No.108/2005 and other coniiectmi matters. No order as. t0 costs. y Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatu' /