3 / i y ‘ g]IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHI AT BILASPUR D B HON’BLE Mr JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR SINHA & ‘ HON’BLE Mr JUSTICE T P sHARMA M/s Jatmdra Nath Dutta and ‘ Sons Clo Shantanu Kumar I Dutta P O Meman District Bardwan (W B) Through its 'Partner-Shantanu Kumar Dutta S/o Late Shrl Ramesh Chandra Dutta Aged about 52 - years; P.0.~Memari, District Bardwan (w.B.) c Versus 1 State of' Chhattisgarh, Thrbugh the Secretary, Finance Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) I Ghhattisgarh State Mino Forest Produce (Trading 8: Development)' Cooperative i Federation Ltd., Through its Managing Director A-25 VIP Estate near VIP Club Khamardrh Shanker Naer Raipur of Commercial Tax, Vikray Kar Commissioner Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur ‘ (C.G.) i WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 1 O THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT APPEAL TO DIVISI BENCH) ACT! 2006 Aearance pp Mr AnkitSinghal Counsel forthe appellant Mr M P S Bhatia Government Advocate fo respondentst & 3 Mr AS Kachhwaha Advocate appears on behalf o Mr Kishore Bhaduri Counsel for respondent No ‘ APPELLANT RESPONDENTS -7 r .r ‘ ' g F r ON r f 2 WRIT APPEAL NO 68I‘201 (27 04 2011) ORAL ORDER \ I l I The followmg order of the Coug't was passed by Sunll Kumar Sinha, J I 1 i Heard on LA. No.01/2011, ar§ application for t coHdonatioh of deléy in filing the appeaL : ‘On due consideration of the Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the appellant has shown sufficient cause for not filing the appeal r in ‘time and the deiay in filing the appeal deserves to be j condoned ‘ Accordingly, IA No 01/2011 is allowed and the delay in - tiling the appeal Is hereby condoned Learned counsel for the parties are also heard 'on admission. This appeal is directed against a common order dated 01.10.2010 passed in a batch of writ petitions. Against the said common order, many writ appeals, including W.A. No ’452/2010 were f'led It is stated at bar that all the writ appeals filed against the common order have been dismissed by a Dwrsron Bench of this Court by a common judgment I dared 19‘“ofApnl2o11 j Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal may also be dismissed/disposed of in terms of the above common judgment dated 19‘“ of April 2011 passed in r W.A. No.452/2010 and other connected writ appeals. , ln view of the above the present Writ Appeal is ,g dismissed in terms of the common Judgment dated 19‘“ of April 2011 passed in the above batch of writ appeals Certified copy as per rules v Sdl- T.P.Sharma' ‘Jtldge Sd/— unil Kumar Sinha ’“ iii Judge l r 1 r : v