1 rma IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 111 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 111 OF 2010 Devendra S Doctor .. Appellant Vs The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Devendra S Doctor - Appellant in person CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATE : 5th JULY, 2010 P.C.: 1. Appellant is appearing in person. He states that the present appeal is not maintainable. In view of this, he wants to withdraw the appeal 2. Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. Needless to say that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and if the appellant wants to adopt any remedy available to him in law, he may 1.capl2-10&cai3-10 2 do so. This however may not be interpreted as a liberty granted by us. 3. Needless to say, in view of disposal of appeal, the civil application does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 1.capl2-10&cai3-10