IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32815 of 2011 1. Niraj Kumar @ Neeraj Kumar, son of Chotu Yadav. 2. Poonam Devi @ Poonam Kumari, D/o Krishna Rai. 3. Pappu Rai @ Pappu Kumar, son of Krishna Rai. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3 19.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering that the petitioner no.3 is the brother-in- law of the informant and that there is no specific overt act alleged against him, it is ordered that in the event of surrender of the petitioner no.3, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 154 of 2011, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed 2 for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. With regard to the petitioner nos. 1 and 2, since they have already been arrested by the police, the prayer for anticipatory bail against them having become infructuous. Therefore, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner nos. 1 and is dismissed as having become infructuous. Md. Ibrarul ( Anjana Prakash, J.)