IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4790 of 2008 Decided on: 25.08.2010 Bali Ram …Petitioner Versus Secretary Transport to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. M.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent No. 1. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: i) The applicant humbly pray before the Ld. Tribunal to direct the respondents to make payment of arrears of pay and allowances for the period of suspension i.e. from 27.7.1992 to 4.3.1994, with interest and cost of the petition. 2. The petitioner has not placed on record the copy of order/ judgment dated 7.1.1994 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- Magistrate, Arki in case No. 7/02 of 1993, whereby the petitioner has been acquitted. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that the arrears of salary for the period w.e.f. 27.7.1992 to 4.3.1994 shall be paid to the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to release the arrears of salary and other allowances for the period w.e.f. 27.7.1992 to 4.3.1994 along with interest @ 7% per annum to the petitioner within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. However, the petitioner is permitted to assail any subsequent order, which has been passed after filing of the petition, before the appropriate Forum. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 25, 2010 (K. Attri)