IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR RESPONDENTS 1 Vivek Kumar S/o. Basant / Kumar Saraf, Aged about 27 years, R/o. Baloda Bazar, Tahsil— Baloda Bazar, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.) (Plaintifg 2 Vijay Kumar, aged about 28 years, 3. Usha Bai, aged about 33 years, )4’ Vidya Bai aged about 31 years, /§,. Tijiya Bai, aged about 29 years, 6 Savitri Bai, aged about 27 years, Respondent no. 2 to 6 All’s father late Raisingh Kanwar, Caste Gond. /7( Mehatrin Bai, Wd/o. late Raisingh Kanwar, aged about 68 years, /8/. Smt. Matibai Wd/o. Raisingh Kanwar, aged about 43 years, . Ramsharan S/o Devnath Karivyar, aged about 48 years, 10.: Bhulenshwari Bai, Wd/o. late ‘Umarao Kanwar, aged about 43 years, W“ M. Ag; No. a? /2o1o (s.3.l §mgie Eagm APPELLANT /' vSuraj Ram, S/o. Kunwar (Defendant No. Singh aged about 41 years, 21) V.V caste Kanwar (illegally .1 ‘ ‘$$’£ described Gond) R/o. Village “$.wi‘g‘gw Parsabhader, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS /Ll. X12. 13, /f 22. Minor Devendra Kanwar Minor Yogendra Kanwar Minor Shyamlata Kanwar ! Respondent no. 11 to ’13 minor guardian S/o. Umrao Kanwar Through: Natural Guardian: Smt. Bhuleshwari Bai, Wd/o. Umrao Kanwar Narad Ram, aged 33 years, Caste Gond. Fulkanwar, aged about 53 years, Caste Gond. ." Fuleshwari, aged about 31 years, Caste Gond, Tihar, aged about 42 years, Caste Gond. Uma aged about 38 years, Caste Gond, Kunti Bai, aged about 31 years, Caste Gond, Shanti, aged about 29 years, Caste Gond, Respondent niQ. 14 to 20, all’s father late Devnath Kanwar Smt. Sewti, aged about 68 years, Wd/ o. Devnath Kanwar, respondent no. 2 to 21, all residents of Baloda Bazar, Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.O State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 Q) OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE WWM§WW?%§Q WMAUCPRW?;QR% W mm (Wu) WWW ammm WW wW mafgam agaimm 8.5. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. arwal 17-03-2010 Shri Santosh Sahu, couns for the appeiiant. Shri'Sameer Behar, P.L. fo the State. 'Leérned counsel appeari g for the appellant, on instruction, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to avail the re edy that may be available to him under the provisions of la . Permission granted, as pr yed for. Accordingly, the appeal is ismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty Learned counsel for the app ilant prays that certified copy of the impugned order be returnedt him Registry is directed to retu n the certified copy of the impugned order on counsel‘s furnis ing authenticated true copy of the same. Sd/n Vt N.K. Agrawal i Judge ‘,,W,,,MA KW ,r e—l—T i b y