IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22082 of 2005 Between: Farzana Khatoon, W/o Salabat Ali Khan, R/o H.No.11-4-649/B, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE (ASSIGNMENTS) The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for a writ of Certiorari to quash proceedings dated 25-08-2005 of respondent No.1. The impugned proceedings have been questioned mainly on the ground that the suo motu revisional powers exercised by respondent No.1 after a lapse of 50 years is arbitrary. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) placed before me a copy of order dated 02-07- 2008, in W.P.No.20104 of 2005 and batch, wherein an identical issue has been considered and the writ petitions were allowed by setting aside the order passed by respondent No.1 on the ground that exercise of revisional powers either under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 or under Section 166-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli is arbitrary and illegal. It is admitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the issue raised in this writ petition is identical to the one considered and decided by the learned Judge in the said batch. Therefore, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the said order and the impugned proceedings of respondent No.1 are quashed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 25th July, 2008 vrn