1» ^-s^^ ^...-- 3.^^?^ ^eS^:E^: r^9"~ ..---"" u*sd.--' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.[S] N0. ^13 /2009 PETITIONERS: ^. Brijesh Kumar Gupta, S/o Deo Kumar Gupta, aged about 21 years, Shiksha Karnii Grade-III, Government Primary School Chutiyadamar, R/o Village Post Tatapani, District Surguja [C.G.] Ku. Geeta Gupta, D/o Amardev Gupta, aged about 29 years, Shiksha Karrai Grade III Government Primary School Nawadin, R/o Village Nawadih, Post Tatapani Distt. Surguja [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Panchayat 85 Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] Janpad Panchayat, Balrampur, through: Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Balrainpur, District Surguja [C.G.] Zila Panchayat, Surguja through: its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surguja, District Surguja [C.G.] Block Education Officer, Balrampur, District Surguja [C.G.j 1. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIQNEBS - HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6893 of2009 Petitioners Brijesh Kuinar Gupta & aaother Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of fhe Constitution of India) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None appears nor aay representation is inade on behalfofthe petitioners. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the respoadeuts No. 1 aad 4. O RD E R (orall ( Passed on this 8th day of March, 2010) Perused fhe papers. 1. Thc petitioners have filed an application (I.A.No.2) for wifhdrawal of fhe petitfon. The application is supported by aa afi&davit. 2. 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State has xio objection. lu view of the above, the writ petftion is disnussed as witfadrawn. No order as to costs. ' 1 _ sd^ 1 sa&h K. Agnihotri Thakur