IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5318 of 2008. Decided on: 16.11.2010. _________________________________________________________ Raj Kumari. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. J.R. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-8 of the paper book. Petitioner was engaged on 1st January, 1982. She has worked for 231 days in 1982, 221 days in 1983, 296 days in 1984, 346 ½ days in 1985 and 122 days in 1986. She has not worked at all in 1987 and 1988 respectively. She has worked for 212 days in 1989. Thereafter she has completed 240 days in the year 1990 onwards till 1998. Consequently, she was regularized as Class-IV on 3rd November, 1998. Since the petitioner had only worked continuously and completed 8 years with effect from 1990 to 1998, she could only be regularized from 3rd November, 1998. Since the petitioner has not completed 240 days in 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - each calendar year from 1982 onwards till 1990, she could not be regularized w.e.f. 1992, as claimed by her. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 16, 2010. (sck).