IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 119 OF 1996 PETITION NO. 119 OF 1996 PETITION NO. 119 OF 1996 DR. DR. DR. BAJRANG SUKHDEORAO KORDE ... PETITIONER. BAJRANG SUKHDEORAO KORDE ... PETITIONER. BAJRANG SUKHDEORAO KORDE ... PETITIONER. VERSUS VERSUS VERSUS BHOR BHOR BHOR & VELHI TALUKA KRISHI & VELHI TALUKA KRISHI & VELHI TALUKA KRISHI AOUDYOGIK AOUDYOGIK AOUDYOGIK VIKAS MANDAL & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS. VIKAS MANDAL & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS. VIKAS MANDAL & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS. SHRI SHRI SHRI V.P.SHINTRE & A.G.DAMLE FOR THE V.P.SHINTRE & A.G.DAMLE FOR THE V.P.SHINTRE & A.G.DAMLE FOR THE PETITIONER PETITIONER PETITIONER & MR. BHOSALE FOR RSPONDENT NO.2 & MR. BHOSALE FOR RSPONDENT NO.2 & MR. BHOSALE FOR RSPONDENT NO.2. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATE DATE DATE : February 12, 2007. : February 12, 2007. : February 12, 2007. ..... ..... ..... P.C. P.C. P.C. 1.1.1. By By By the present petition, the judgment and the present petition, the judgment and the present petition, the judgment and Order Order Order passed by the University and College Tribunal passed by the University and College Tribunal passed by the University and College Tribunal isisis challenged, interalia dismissing the appeal filed challenged, interalia dismissing the appeal filed challenged, interalia dismissing the appeal filed by by by the present petitioner. the present petitioner. the present petitioner. 2.2.2. By By By an Order dated 4.4.1996, passed by the an Order dated 4.4.1996, passed by the an Order dated 4.4.1996, passed by the Additional Additional Additional Registrar, the petition came to be Registrar, the petition came to be Registrar, the petition came to be dismissed dismissed dismissed against the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 for against the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 for against the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 for non-prosecution. non-prosecution. non-prosecution. In view of the said dismissal of In view of the said dismissal of In view of the said dismissal of the the the writ petition against respondent No.1 and 3, no writ petition against respondent No.1 and 3, no writ petition against respondent No.1 and 3, no notices notices notices came to be issued to the said respondents In came to be issued to the said respondents In came to be issued to the said respondents In view view view of the dismissal of the writ petition against of the dismissal of the writ petition against of the dismissal of the writ petition against respondent respondent respondent No. 1 and 3 for non prosecution, the No. 1 and 3 for non prosecution, the No. 1 and 3 for non prosecution, the grievance grievance grievance made by the petitioner in this petition made by the petitioner in this petition made by the petitioner in this petition cannot cannot cannot be considered and, in effect, the petition be considered and, in effect, the petition be considered and, in effect, the petition stands stands stands dismissed in view of the Order dated 4.4.1996. dismissed in view of the Order dated 4.4.1996. dismissed in view of the Order dated 4.4.1996. 3.3.3. In In In the result, the writ petition stands the result, the writ petition stands the result, the writ petition stands dismissed. dismissed. dismissed. Rule discharged. Rule discharged. Rule discharged. ..... ..... ..... [A.P.DESHPANDE, [A.P.DESHPANDE, [A.P.DESHPANDE, J.] J.] J.]