THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 7177 of 2004 Dated: 14-09-2005 Between: G.Shyamaiah @ G.Arjun Rao ..... PETITIONER AND Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Lakdi Ka Pool, R.R.District and three others .....RESPONDENTS O R D E R: This writ petition is field seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents in interfering with civil disputes and harassing the petitioner without there being any reason, on a false complaint made by the respondents 3 and 4, as arbitrary and illegal. In pursuance of the rule nisi ordered, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Narsingi Police Station, Rangareddy District filed a counter affidavit dated 27-07-2004 stating as under: ‘As regards averments in para-9, I submit that it is a fact that the petitioner and his son were acquitted in C.C.No.13/99 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chevella, Rangareddy District. As regards the possession and ownership of the land in question, as per the averments of the petitioner in the writ affidavit, the proceedings are pending before the civil court and before the Revenue Authorities. The police has nothing to do with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 and is only interested in maintaining law and order. The respondent 3 and 4 have not lodged any complaint against the petitioner as alleged in the writ affidavit and I never called the petitioner or his son to the Narsinghi Police Station either on 3-4-2004 or any other subsequent date and harassed them. Therefore, the allegations that I am regularly calling the petitioner and his son to Narsinghi Police Station and harassing them are not correct. The allegations in the affidavit against the police are totally false. Narsingi police have never interfered in the civil disputes of the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4.’ The version of the respondents has not been disputed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar submits that pending the writ petition, O.S.No.10 of 2000 filed by the petitioner on the file of the Principal Junior civil Judge, West and South, Ranga RedPdy District has been decreed. In the circumstances, no further adjudication is necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, recording the statement of the respondents in the counter affidavit that they are not interfering with the civil disputes of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________ G.ROHINI,J 14-09-2005 Note: Issue C.C. in one week B/o klp