IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10914 of 2008 MANAV KARTVYA BODH JAGRITI SANSTHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Maruth Nand Roy, Junior Counsel to Standing Counsel-XI ----------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----------- Dated, the 18th August, 2008. This writ petition is not only misconceived, frivolous rather it is an abuse of the process of the Court. Prior to the present writ petition, writ petition (C.W.J.C. No. 4030 of 2007) was filed by the petitioner for almost the identical relief. That writ petition was disposed of on 30th May, 2007. A couple of other writ petitions on the same issues filed by the different parties in the nature of public interest litigation came to be disposed of nine days before the earlier writ petition of the petitioner was disposed of. Two of those writ petitions being C.W.J.C. No. 4065 of 2007 and C.W.J.C. No. 4647 of 2007 were disposed of on 21st May, 2007. The Division Bench of this Court in the order of 21st May, 2007 has said thus: - “We have been taken through the relevant paragraphs of the affidavit and the decisions relied on by the State along with the counter affidavit and we find that the grievance which is voiced in this petition, does not, at - 2 - present, survive for the reason that the State of Bihar has already initiated and undertaken various measure for preparation of revised list of Below Poverty Line peoples (B.P.L.) ] It is in this context, this petitioner being C.W.J.C. No. 4647 of 2007 is not required to be entertain at this stage.” 2. There may be some error or mistake in preparation of the list of Below Poverty Line People but those specific instances should be brought to the notice of the concerned authorities. However, that does not mean that this Court should be approached again for the self same relief. 3. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. 4. This will, however, not preclude the petitioner from bringing to notice of the concerned authorities, irregularities found in the preparation of B.P.L. list, if any. We observe that if any specific representation is made to the concerned authorities, the same will be considered in accordance with law. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Pawan/-