IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH §§ Writ Petition N0. 2006 \ SERVICE MATTER-3.3. AT BILASPUR PETITIONER :- Mahesh Kumar Janokar S/o. Late Shri Udal Janokar Aged about 36 Vears R/o. Karbala Road, Behind City Hospital Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1.The State of Chhattisgarh Through : its Secretary Department of Labour D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secreta ry Ministry of Finance Department of Finance D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Labour Commissioner Office at Avanti Vihar, Near Anmoi Apartment, Telebandha Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Deputy Director Audyogic Swasthya Avam Suraksha (industrial Health & Scurity) Opp. SBI, High Court Bilaspur (C.G.) / wwm %m _ $Wm Shn RIM Solapurkar § , Shrmatlsh Gupta Dy( 'Apphcatlon for urgent h‘ _ :Heani‘ : A Learned counsel fdr tht Vas Peon in' the offée ’of resp petitioner , v also submts/tha’t tne petition ‘ I 2619mm ‘Annex Pi5) and a‘ no 31Labour Commissmner mfc the Finance on 19I5/2005 for a‘ also Issued on 9/9i2005 but the‘ Learned counsei for th reason for keeping-the rnatter p4 ‘ Siaie counsei is not in a isubmits that the State wouid do ‘ On pemsal of the recoro . Finance but the State nas not r ' I Ihe matter be decldeo posrtnvew ' -the oopy of’th‘is oroer before th The action raken and the 0rd: > communicated to the petmoner r may avau the remedy avarlabh .arresh V 7 ‘ m yiew‘or the’rabo‘ve’, t‘n hberty Certmed copy as per rule m. t -& Shri Hemant Solapurkar counel/for} the} govt Advocate Iorrhe Stat ,anng rs aliowed \x = petitioner submits that the petitioner is eerving undent no 4 Counsel further submlts that tne petltloner has not been regulamzed though he Is quahfed Tor the post Counselv. ‘ er served the nottce for demand of justroe on ‘ per Annex P/o oatecl z5/1DI2005 respondent lrmeo that the case or the petlttoner was sent to ,cordlng pennlsslon and thereafter reminder was State has not responded petrtloner suomlts that there Is no justlnable,. =ndlng ‘ posrtron to submit any explanation. .He however the needrui m the matter _ ' x, lt Is apparent that the matter was referred to the esponded Let the requtred steps be taken and V L Wttnln two months trom the aate of production ot = competent authorlty ot the State GovernmenL =r passed by the State Government would be ln case any grievance remains, the petitioner ‘ under the; law including flting of the petition s’petition stands disposedm‘ at this stage with (e l Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge ' . l Copy tothe State counse, ., s e