IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2011 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 37164 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ ST.KURIAKOSE ORTHODOX SYRIAN CHURCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ENATHU, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. JAIBY PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P (C) No.37164/2010 -2- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 – TRUE COPY OF THE GIFT DEED No.764/1997 OF ENATHU SRO ISSUED BY (LATE) K.E. GEORGE, VALUTHUNDIL PUTHENVEETIL HOUSE ENATHU. EXT.P2 – TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA No.LA-1/81 ISSUED BY SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ASSIGNMENT, ADOOR. EXT.P3 – TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 11-02-2010, SENT BY THE TRUSTEE OF THE PETITIONER TO THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ASSIGNMENT, ADOOR. EXT.P4 – TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL COVER THAT WAS RETURNED FROM THE OFFICE OF SPECIAL LAND ASSIGNMENT TAHSILDAR. EXT.P5 – TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 24-03-2010 MADE BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH ITS LAWYER. EXT.P6 – TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION No.C6-9695/2010 (2) DATED 31-03-2010 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P7 – TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BEARING No.A5-48/10 RTI DATED 26-04-2010 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P8 – TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30-11-2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.37164 OF 2010 -------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of March 2011 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 within a reasonable time. 2. Heard the learned Govt. Pleader as well. 3. In view of the limited nature of the relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the 1st respondent for taking further steps. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE vdv