IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33146 of 2008 1. Udit Shankar Khan, son of Kedar Khan 2. Dhananjay Kumar Khan, son of Udit Shankar Khan 3. Mrituyunjay Kumar Khan, son of Udit Shankar Khan 4. Sheotunjay Kumar @ Sheotunjay Kumar Khan, son of Udit Shankar Khan 5. Satanjib Kumar @ Satanjib Kumar Khan, son of Mahashankar Khan 6. Pappu Khan, son of Bindeshwari Khan All are resident of village and p.s. Bangaon, District-Saharsa. …..Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Lakshman Paswan, son of Baldeo Paswan, resident of Bariahi Harijan Colony, p.s. Bangaon, District-Saharsa. …..Opposite Parties. ----------- 02/ 01.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of taking cognizance dated 31.01.2008, which has been challenged by learned Counsel for the petitioners by filing a revision which was disposed of on 16.06.2008. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that after investigation of the case, the police submitted final form. On the basis of the protest, order taking cognizance has been passed. There is prima facie case under Sections 341, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and as such 2 cognizance has been taken and the revisional court confirmed the case against the petitioner. In view of the finding of the court below, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the order impugned. This application is dismissed. kksinha/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)