IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 7147 of 2008. Decided on: 30.07.2010. _________________________________________________________ Prem Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Respondents No. 3 and 4, already exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Petitioner is seeking promotion to the post of Senior Carpenter Grade-II. The precise case of the respondent- Corporation is that though the petitioner is senior to respondents No. 3 to 5, however, he was not found suitable for promotion because of his unsatisfactory performance of work and A.C.Rs.. Since the case of the petitioner had already been seen by the duly constituted D.P.C. and was not found suitable for promotion to the post of Senior Carpenter Grade-II, this Court cannot sit in appeal over the recommendations made by a duly constituted selection committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. However, it is made clear that if the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. petitioner is found suitable, his case will be considered in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 30, 2010. (bhupender)