IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2008 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17179 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.C. THOMAS KUTTY, PROPRIETOR, JYOTHI HOMEO PHARMACY, KOMALAPURAM, NORTH ARYAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA 688 542. BY ADV. SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR SRI.BEJOY CHERIYAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AA), ALPPUZHA. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES,ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 17179 OF 2008 T ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 10th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner seeks quashing of Ext.P2 assessment order. Against Ext.P2, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 appeal supported with Ext.P4 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. He was issued Ext.P5 revenue recovery notice. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. The writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P4 stay petition in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In doing so, the 2nd respondent will specifically take note of Ext.P1 order passed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner for the assessment year 2002-03. Till such decision is taken, revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent as soon as it is received. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE