é) m QafwA @.‘ Emma %m§\a BEFORE THE HON‘BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WW ILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 6} g Z /2oos / w' Sic. Lafe $hri Girdhari La‘ Agmwci, Aged abouf 57 years, R/o. M/s. Shyam Traders, Power House Road, Korba, Tahsii & Disfricf Korba (6.6.) PEHTICNER Shyam Sundar Agrawal, VERSUS naPONDENTs 1. I“ sme of Chhattzsgarh Through The Secr'efury, Foresf Department D.K.5. Bhawan, Manfmiaya, Raipur (6.6.) 2. Chief Conservator of Fores’r, Raipur Diswicf Raipur (C.G.) 3. Conservator, 0f Forest Biiaspur Districf Biicspur (6.6.) ' Divisional Fares? Officer, Korbo Division, Rqigamar Road, Kosha Badi, Korba (C.G.) Fares? Range Officer, Korba (T) Range Korba (CG) 5.A. Khan, 5/0. N01 Known, In—charge of Fiying Squad, Fares? Deparfmeni‘, Korba (6.6.) SD. Mishra, 5/0. N01 known, Foresf Range Officer, Korba (T) Division, Disfricf Korba (C.é.) s. Coiiecior, Koran, Distric'i Karim (ca) H!GH COURT OF‘ CHHATTISGARH AT BfLASPUR WRIT PETIT¥ON (CL! Na. 6182 OF 2068 Shyam Sundar Agrawal Petitioner Versus V 7 Resgondems State of Chhathsgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Anime 226 of the Constitutnan of lndta) (SB Hon ble Mr Satlsh K Agmhotn J) Pre5em - None Farthe pemmner. _ .m... - shri P.K.Bhaduri’, Pane; Lawyer forms State. ' $DER 1ORALI (Passeé on € this 19 day of Juiy, 201 1 ) 1. The matter is-ca!!ed for hearing twice. None appears nor is an representation made on behaif of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. in view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/— . ‘7 r,’ Satish K. Agnihotrl‘ Judge y