wp1710of10.sxw 1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1710 OF 2010 Dilip Shankar Mulay .. Petitioner -versus Pradip Shankar Mulay and anr .. Respondents. The petitioner present in persons. None for the respondents. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 27 th April, 2010 P.C. 1. None for the respondents. The petitioner Dilip Mule present is person, makes statement that the respondents are served by Registered post A.D. 2. In a suit for partition, the contesting respondent No.1 except exh.26 denied all the documents by providing reasons in their say to the Notice dated 25.8.2009. 3. Though served other respondents not denied these documents. Therefore, in view of AIR 1986 Punjab and Haryana 310, G. M. Worsted Spinning Mills -vs- M/s Lakshmi Commercial Bank Ltd., and considering the scope of Order 12, Rule 2 and 3-A of Civil Procedure Code, opportunity was given by wp1710of10.sxw 2 the Court to defendant Nos 2 & 3 to admit these documents, therefore, the Court to proceed accordingly. 4. So far as defendant-respondent No.1 is concerned as there is reply given and except one all other documents are denied, plaintiff to take steps in accordance with law. The Court to proceed accordingly. The petition is disposed of. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)