INH!!!".">41"-lli!:>ltA ®1 ••/ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WP.Na 32-&'SOF2004 PETITIONER ^-<^k ^^^ 37-<-AX"'(A^'-' ^y^ f^^ ^ESPONDENTS ^ M/s Sungrow Bio-tech Pvt. Ltd. Through Anil Kumar Agrawal, Mathpurena Ring Road No.1, Raipur 492001 [C.G.T VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Health Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan,G.E.Road,Raipur[C.G.] 2. Drug Licensee Officer [Manufacturing] Khadya and Ausadhi Prashasan Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. Drug Inspector, Office of Controller Khadya avam Ausadhi Prashasan, Chhattisgarh Room No. 170ld Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Compound, near Mantralaya, Raipur [C.G.] PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA <-r <- s- .c"i:'—-a!ii. :\vv 3I!^t^iT W SW^V Hi^il^ ^S^tf J'slBMW^Ws^' L-ieepij -ySI VfPVvPi, SSTll'y'lri, fa<rtlt1ll< •7- 1^5 .p. ^c .^>Q^i^ '20C 31|^F[ ^RIWHR^i sB : Hon'bie Snn Kianindra Mojtan Shrivastava. J Q5.Q4-2011 fbr snri H.b.Agrawal. Senlorl counset ror me pemioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Depilty Survakant Mishra, Panel Lawver This petition has been fil| respondent No.2 bv which, the drilig aays. i nough notices were suspension has alreadv exoired. nas Decome acaaemic. Accordingly, the petition rendered infructuous. it is how^ suspension is used for prejudic^ wouid be at iiberty to assail the issu^ct ^TpfeN iTFRTf •? fSt?t ^•FCT( ^T aifigir gn^r Advocate along with Ms. Sarina Khan, Advocate Generai aiong with Shri the State/respondents. id against order dated 8/9/04 passed bv lig license was suspended for a Deriod of 15 ^d, there is no interim order. The period of 'herefore, ihe issue raised in the Detition is finaiiy disposed off as having been ver observed that in case, an order of of the petitioner in future, the petitioner safne 'Sd/- Manindra IVIohan Shrivastava Judge