1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.181 of 2009. Sunil Madhukarrao Bhedurkar. Vs. State of Mah and others. .---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. B. Ahirkar, APP for State/Respondent. Coram: A. H. JOSHI AND A. B. CHAUDHARY, JJ. Dated: 26th March 2009. 1. Learned APP for the respondent State has tendered for our perusal copy of order dated 10-3-2009 directing the release of the petitioner on furlough. 2. In view of this, no further directions are necessary. Petition is disposed of. 3. We have perused the order of release. Prisoner has been asked to furnish personal bond of Rs.100/- and surety bond of Rs.1000/-. 2 4. The amount of personal Bond of Rs.100/- carries no significance or impact on the prisoner. 5. We are not making any observation on the point of the amount of surety bond. However, we disapprove bond by prisoner to be only of Rs.100/-, and we see that no prejudice would be suffered by prisoner if the bond to be executed by the prisoner is of much higher amount. 6. Learned APP undertakes to communicate to the DIG that he should update himself on record directions by State Government prescribing higher amount to be ordered for personal bond and cash surety by the prisoner. JUDGE JUDGE Sbm