IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13720 of 2006 SHEONATH, SON OF LATE RAMA NAND MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMJI CHAK, YADAV GALI, P.O.- BATA GANJ, P.S.- DIGHA, DISTRICT – PATNA. …… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFICE, PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, R. BLOCK, R. NO. -6, PATNA. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BATA INDIA LIMITED, BATA GANJ, DIGHA, PATNA. ……… RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 27.04.2011 The petitioner has prayed for directing the respondents particularly, respondent no. 1/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, to re-fix his pension. Sri B.K. Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, submits that pension of the petitioner has rightly been fixed in accordance with “Employee Pension Scheme, 1995”, and there is no error. He further submits, that if aggrieved, the petitioner can approach the competent authority by filing representation. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the competent authority. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)