1 caf434 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.434 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.218 OF 2011 Kantilal & Co. ...Appellant vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.P.R.Kadam for the appellant Mr.Harinder Toor with S.K.Chari i/b M/s.M.V.Kini & Co. for the respondent no.1 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 4,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the first respondent. It is not in dispute that the applicant has complied with the statement recorded in order dated 14 th February 2011 by depositing the requisite amount with the first respondent. Hence, prayer clause (a) of this application will have to be granted with modification. Accordingly, application is disposed of by passing the following order: i) Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition that the applicant shall keep on regularly and punctually paying electricity bills issued hereinafter to the first respondent and will not commit any breach. ii)In the event any breach is committed by the applicant, it will be open for the respondents to apply for vacating the interim relief. 2 caf434 iii)It will be open for the applicant to submit a proposal for settlement to the first respondent. If such proposal is submitted by the applicant, it will be open for the first respondent to consider the same notwithstanding the pendency of this appeal. JUDGE