^yiv^'s^^^s^^i^^^sass^ '^:^^yilS^Sf^^^^ HIGHCOURT OF CHHftmSGARH ATBILASPUR li-~»t •\' ^ SINGLE BENGH ; HON'BLE SHFU JAGDISHBHA1.LA, Ag. CJ. WritPetition N0.3796 of 1994 \ 2. 3. 4. •Alois Ekka, aged about 66' years, Retired Assistant Teacher, Ambika Mission Middle. School, Ambikapur, Residerit of Fundurdihari, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, M.P. Versus State of Madhya Pradesh : Thnsugh - the Secretary, School Edueation Department, : Vallabh -Bhawan, Bhopa! : ' Joint Direotor, ,Schp6i Education, Sarguja Divjsion, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, M.P. j !, ' Deputy pireotor, Sctiool Education, AmbikapuF, ; post Ambikapyr Distt. Suiguja, M.P.. Manager,: St. Xavier's Higher Secondar^: Soliotil, Ambilaptir, Distt., .Sarguja, M.P. : ' Petition ynder .Artiole 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Present: ShnP.K.Bhaduri, counselfortttepgtittoner. ShriSahjayS. Agrawal, Govt.AdvQcateTorthe Stafe/respondents .1to3..'; : . ORAt.ORDER (Passedon11 .June,2{»7} Petittoner atfained the age of superannuation in the year 1:991: anjj according to himtiecontihuedtoperfornndutiesasTeachertill 30tl'Jurie.l99'l, i.e. for a period ofthree years theraafter; 1-low^yer, he has not been paid hife full salaryfor the periodofthr^ years-ratheri'he was only.paid haff saiary 1o thesaidReriod.;,."^ • •- li''':';:^:''.:';^' ':•;,' :; :':- Learned coynsel torfhe^etJtionerrelijes:uponthe.ciRsuIarGfttie:gtat^ Qovernment dated 109-12-1974: wfiereirt.it is-Ep^cled that.extensib^c^ granted: to a' teac;heF.1al|.:he,a8aihs,ithe 'Sge! :ol' :S5 ^yegre. fD!!e| suRerannyation isl^Foyielect uhcleF^tl^|aFicl|ti&;Sa(r)!e; bas ;not ,b6eEi;^(tgBe|e{i ;tliefe as:'noiljiing;i;oii^tieeiU-d ^ by way of tte. amepcltneiit<in,tHe)A86:| ^l-ltWte^i- !1a§8! df •! 1 F show that neither any pennission was sought by respondent No. 4 to extend the 'period of petitioner's service nor demanded any money towards the payment of salary of the petitioner. Since, there is nottiing on record to show that the sa'ary was being demanded by respondent No.4, petitioner cannot demand satary from the State Governmentfortheperiod he has worked after attaining the age of superannuation without approval ofthe State Oovernment. In these circumstances, no interference is warranted. However; itwould be open forthe petifioner to demand the same from respondent No.4 or in the alternative approach to the competent Court for redressal of his grievances. With these observ^tions the petition stands decided. Sd/- Acting Ouef Justice v*s^- >