WPCRL No. 1021 of 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A. for respondent No. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his argument that interim maintenance should be from the date of application of interim maintenance and not from earlier date. There is no factual dispute hence I feel no need to issue notice to respondent no.2 & 3. Interim maintenance granted by Judge, Family Court, Hardwar is justified. However, order stands modified to this extent that interim maintenance shall be payable from the date of application seeking interim maintenance. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) 25-11-2009 JKJ