IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33099 of 2011 Kamta Yadav, Son of Late Nanhku Yadav, Resident of Village – Baruha, P.S. – Bagengola, District – Buxar……………………. Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar … …………. Opp. Party ---------------------------------- 2 19.10.2011 Heard Sri Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shyam Bihari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. This is the second attempt for grant of bail. Earlier, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 05.03.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 42841 of 2009 keeping in view the seriousness of the allegation as well as antecedent of the petitioner. One of the reasons for rejection of bail was that in the case charges were already framed and the case was fixed for evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date only four witnesses have been examined out of fourteen witnesses, and as such, it was submitted that there is no possibility of early conclusion of the trial. Since evidence is going on, the court is of the opinion that no privilege for grant of bail can be granted to the petitioner. Prayer for bail again stands rejected. The court below is required to expedite the trial and conclude the same without any delay. If 2 trial is not concluded within eight months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)