WPSS No.470/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala J. Mr. Kurban Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K. C. Tiwari, the learned brief holder for the State. Mr. Manish Dalakoti, Advocate holding brief of Mr. D. S. Patni, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. The petitioners are aggrieved by the resolution dated 3.4.2010 passed by the Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital by which the waiting list of the Sweeper prepared in 1995 has been set aside and a direction has been issued to prepare a new waiting list. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that by the Government Order dated 28th October, 1995, it was clearly stated that the waiting list would continue till it gets exhausted and consequently, the learned counsel contends that the resolution of the Board is patently erroneous and in violation of the Government Order dated 28th October, 1995. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is misconceived. At the outset, merely because, the names of the petitioners are in the waiting list prepared in the year 1995 does not give them a right to approach the writ court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Further, a perusal of the Government Order dated 28th October, 1995 clearly indicates that the prepared waiting list was subject to revision every quarterly and that the said list was to be revised. Consequently, it cannot be said that the list would continue till it gets exhausted itself. The resolution of the Board of the Nagar Palika Parishad does not suffer from any error. This court does not find any merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed. Dated: 24.6.2010 (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Nishant