1 caf399 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.399 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.21837 OF 2010 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Ms Deepali Patil i/b Mr.Sagar Joshi for the Applicant Mr.C.M.Lokesh i/b Mr.D.R.Mahadik for the respondent no.2 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 11,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the second respondent. Considering the challenge in the appeal, first respondent may not be a necessary party to this application. The first respondent who is the owner of the offending structure has not contested the matter and the contest was only by the second respondent. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the second respondent. Sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE