IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-28298 of 2011 Date of Decision:17.10.2011 Harjit Kaur . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Ashok Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. He submits that the petitioner has delivered a child on 17.9.2011 and is now recovering. He further submits that false case has been implanted upon her. Whereas learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Amrik Singh, has submitted that though the petitioner has joined the investigation but recovery of `20,000/- and gold is yet to be effected. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR is totally vague with regard to amount and gold which is alleged to have been stolen and now the case is being developed on the statement made under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Be that as it may, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 27.9.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition stands disposed of. , (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) OCTOBER 17, 2011 JUDGE Vivek