HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W,P,jC227) NoJ2332 of2009 PetitiQiier • : • Mamta S^hi'ivastava W/o. Taresh Kumar ShrivaMava, aged about 31 years, occupatioii, Advocate, R^ Tikrapara, Bilaspur (CG). Versus Respoiideiit . : Taresh' Kumar Shrivastava, S/o Tulsi Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 40 years, occupation Regional Manager, R//o Purani Basti, Kayasthpara, Raipur, Tahsil Sc District Raipur (CG). Writ Petitioii under Article 227 ofthe Constitution oflndia (Smgle Bencli: Ho3itbie Mr, N.K< Agarwal, J,) Presesit : Shri Atul Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. None forthe respondent. ORAL ORDER 61;:ii Sahu 1. 2. 3. 4. (Passed on 6l" day ofMay,2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does iiot wantto contest the matter. on merits at this stage. liowe'ver, his application, filed under section 125 ofCr.P.C. whlch is pendmg since 2002 before the IIIi'd Additional Prmcipal Judge, Faniily Court (Liiik Court), Bemetara/Distt. Durg, may be directed to be decided m accordance with law within a specified period. He further submits that the case is fixed for evidence ofrespondent on 07.07.2009. Prayer is accepted. It is directed that the court below shall dispose ofthe case m accordance with law^on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably till September, 2009. The petitioner to supply the copy of order within 20 days. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. ,No. order asto.costs. c•onsequeritly, pendmg applications, stand disposed of Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge