: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.120 OF 2009 Vijay Tukaram Raundal ... Appellant V/s. Kisan Laxman Khandwe & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.J. Rairkar i/b N.C. Walimbe for Appellants Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appellant has approached this Court contending that the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune needs to be set aside. According to the appellant, the Court has wrongly decided that he is not entitled to any interim relief. The appellant-plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance of contract which he claims that he entered into with the respondents. He claims that he paid an amount of Rs.4 lakhs to the respondents towards the consideration. The trial Court has held that there was no reliable evidence to show that this amount had in fact been paid to the respondents. Bank statements have been produced indicating Rs.2 lakhs was paid but since there was no evidence to prove that the amount was paid towards consideration of the property, the Court has denied interim relief. 2. In my view, no error has been committed by the trial Court. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed.