IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9956 of 2004 Between: APSRTC. Rep by its Managing Director Musheerabad, Hyd ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State Transport Appellate Tribunal Manoranjan Complex, M.J.Road, Nampally AP. Hyderabad-500 001, rep. by its Presiding Officer. 2 Regional Transport Authority Chittoor Dt., at Chittoor rep. by its Secretary 3 Sri. V.Konda Reddy S/o V.Kondandarama Reddy Plot No.40(Upstaris) padmvathi Puram Tiruchanur Road Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of writ of Certiorari Calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated. 10/03/2004 made in AP.No.25/03 on the file of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, AP. Hyderabad in Setting aside the order dated. 11/11/2002 in item No.5 in R.No.30869/A1/1997 and directing issue of permit to 3rd respondent on the route R.R. Office to SP.W College and quash the same as being hit by the provisions of section 68(3) (ca) and 104 of M.V. Act, 1988 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KALLAKURI SRINIVASARAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT(Not present). Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: Mr. T. Venkataramana.(Not present). The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. The petitioner herein, which is a corporation, seeks to assail the orders passed by the first respondent herein in allowing the appeal filed by contesting respondents herein on the ground that the proposed route is overlapping of 2.5 K.M on the notified route in G.O.Ms.No.31/77, dated 5.1.1977 and further the sector between SPC school and Mutyalapalli Railway bridge is under repairs. Thus several questions are sought to be urged in respect of the writ petition. However, having regard to the principles laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in APSRTC Vs. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLANT TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS, I do not find any merits in the writ petition since the same is governed by the observations made in the judgment cited above. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ 03-08-2004 klp/kvsn To 1 The Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal Manoranjan Complex, M.J.Road, Nampally, AP. Hyderabad-500 001, 2 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Chittoor Dt., at Chittoor. 3. Two C.D copies.