: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.498 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.298 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.M.M. Sathaye for the Appellant. Mr.R.M. Haridas i/b Mr.P.N. Joshi for the Respondents. (In both the matters) CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. Admit and heard finally. 2. All that the learned Judge has done is to set out the arguments/submissions of the advocates, in the impugned orders, without giving any reasons whatsoever. Merely setting out the submissions of the advocates, is not sufficient. The learned Judge ought to : 2 : have given reasons for his order. 3. I appreciate that remanding the matter causes both the parties inconvenience and costs. It is however, necessary for the learned Judge to pass a reasoned order. 4. In the circumstances, the impugned orders are set-aside. Both the matters are remanded to the learned Judge who decided the matter afresh after giving reasons for the same. The learned Judge has already heard the matter. He is therefore requested to dispose of the matter within eight weeks from today. Till the matter is decided, the injunction granted by the impugned orders shall continue. Needless to add that if the learned Judge is not available in the same Court, the matter will be heard by any other Judge in his place. 5. The Appeal from Order and the Civil Revision Application are accordingly disposed of.