IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 4623 of 2008 Between: N.Meherkumar Naidu S/o.N.Nageswara Rao Medchal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Transport & Roads & Buildings Department Secretariat, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the G.O.ms.No. 245 T.R&B (Ser.IV) Department dated 30.8.2007 issued by the respondent as illegal, arbitrary, ultra vires, capricious and violative of the principles of natural justice and the Presidential Order apart from violation of Articles 14&16 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.4623 of 2008 ORDER: (per Smt. T.Meena Kumari,J) The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking to declare G.O. Ms. No.245, TR&B(Services-IV) Department, dated 30.8.2007 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and to set aside the same. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is an applicant in O.A. No. 5242 of 2007. He filed the aforesaid O.A. assailing G.O. Ms. No.245, dated 30.8.2007. The Tribunal, through order dated 6.9.2007, issued notice in the above O.A. Hence the present writ petition. Heard Sri G. Tuhin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Services-II appearing on behalf of the respondent. Admittedly, the Tribunal, through the impugned order only ordered notice in the main O.A. and it did not pass any final orders. In the circumstances, we do not find any valid ground to entertain this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is at liberty to move appropriate application before the Tribunal seeking interim relief. However, the Tribunal shall dispose of the main O.A. itself, namely O.A. No. 5242 of 2007, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J DATE: 5th March, 2008 __________________ G. CHANDRAIAH,J pnb