1 (crim appln 3283 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3283 OF 2010 Jignesh Kishore Parekh ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharshtra & Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr. V.T. Sipahimalani & Co. for Applicant Mrs. P.P. Bhosale -APP for the State Mr. Vineet Jain for Respondent No.2 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 16TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C. 1. This criminal application is filed by the Applicant- Original Accused for quashing the complaint filed by the Respondent No.2 for the offence punishable under sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The parties have settled the dispute and they have filed Consent Terms in Criminal Application No.897 of 2008. As a result of the consent terms being filed, the Applicant was granted anticipatory bail. 2 (crim appln 3283 of 2010) 3. The Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 that the Respondent No.2 has no objection if the complaint is quashed. 4. Perusal of the complaint discloses that the dispute is a personal one between the parties and as such, in view of the judgments in the cases of Jagdish Chanana & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. reported in AIR 2008 SC 1968 and Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 2008 SC 1969, there is no reason why this complaint should not be quashed. 5. Application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause 14(a) and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)