A l^;i(t>-_,lt» VyiWS'- • ?F^': •4' ff? THE HIGH CQURT OP JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.feNQ, 2Q06 Petitioners ^/ _.. .••"'Vy'' ..''' ^/ 2. ^m^ ^/^'>- ^yy ./3. 4. ^^/^ /-• ~ \"^ ^o^/ Mohan Rain Yadav, S/o Tej PAJ Yadav, Aged about 22 years, R/o ViUage & Post - Kandora, TehsU - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.O.) Khirodhar Singh S/o Shri Ramnath Singh, Aged about 27 years, R/o Block Colony - Kunkuri, Tehsil - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.O.j Poqja Jagmag Thakur, W/o Shri Krishna Prasad Thakur, Age^-l about 2-3 years, R/o ViUage & Post - Lodhma, Tehsii - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.G.) Ku. Ahna Kumudani Lakra, D/o Shri AIeksius Lakra, Aged about 22 years, R/o Village & Post - Ginabahar Tehsil - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.G.) Swarupanand Baare, S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged about 20 years, R/o Village and Post - Hardi, Tehsil - Sarangarh, Dist: Raigarh-(C.G-) Tarun Kurp.ar Lahre, S/o Shri Heeralal Lahre, Aged about 20 years, R/o VUlage - Khudmata, Post- Bhelwan Tehsil - Sarangarh, Dist: Raigarh-(C.G.) Smt. Pushpa Pal Dhirhi, W/o Shri Narendra Pal Dhirhi, Aged about 23 years, R/o Vfllage - Ua, Post - Killdla Tehsil - Pafhalgaon, Dist: Jashpur-fC.O.) n. ?..1 ^ ^^.^ ^'/ 8. Ku.Sashika Ekka D/o Shri Najarius Ekka, Aged about 19 years, R/o VUlage - Groto Lini Kimkuri, Tehsil & Post - Kuakuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.G.) 9. Ku. Anupa Devi D/o Shri Baldev Ram, Aged about 20 years, R/o Village & Post - Ghatmunda (DeepatoU), Tehsil - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.G.) 10. Mukesh Singh S/o Shri Ramprasad Singh, Aged about 20 years, R/o ViUage & Post - Duldulla, Tehsil - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C.G.) 11. Goverdhan Patel, S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Patel, Aged about 33 years, R/o Village - Jharmixnda, Post - Tadola (Pussaur), Dist: Raigarh-(C.G.) 12. Prakash Jagmag, S/o Shri Krishna Jagmag, Aged about 20 years, R/o ViUage - BijlitoK Jashpur Nagar, Dist: Jashpur-(C.G.) 13. Ku. Hemowati Bai, D/o Shri Rameshwar Ram Yadav, Aged about 22 years, R/o Village - Chatakpur, Post - Dandadih, TehsU - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-(C,0.) 14. Dinesh Ram Chauhan, S/o Shri Shiv Nandan Ram Chauhan, Aged about 21 years, R/o vmage - Matipahad Chhan-a, Tehsil - Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpiu--(C.G.) ly:'s '.'ersus Respondents : • 1. State of Chhattisgarb Through The Secretaiy Tribal Welfare Departnient, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raiplir-fC.G.) y 2. The Dtrector, Panchayat and Social Wetfare. Raipnr-(C.O.) 3. The CoUector, Jashpur, Dist: Jashpur - (C.O.) , 4. The Block Education Officer, Block - Kiuikuri, Dist: Jashpur-fC.G.) /5. Ttie Chief Executive Of&cer, Janpad Panchayat, Kunkuri, Dist: Jashpur-fC.G.) WR[T PETmON U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA S;^^£&£^:S^BSSIS^ gS^gSS® ^ y^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HCTI'BLE MR. SATtSH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETITION (S.l NOA048 OF 2006 PeStioners Mohan Ram Yadav and ottiere versus Respondents : State of ChhatBsgarh and othere Present : Mr.ArunShukta,counselforthepetitioners. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 4. ft4r. Ravindra Agrawat, counsel for respondent No.5. QBDER >th (Passed on 8m Day of February, 2007) Leamed counset appearing for the parties jointly submit that ttie facts and question of lawinwrived in the present writ petition are covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasatf Yadaw an<f oiffiers vs. State of Chhatffsgarti and others (Writ Petiflon No.3979 of 2006), dat®d8-8-2006 (R-2). 2. The petitionere were appolnted as Shiksha Karmi Grade- 111 by order datsd 27-4-2006 (P-3). Appointment of S5 persons as Shiksha Karmi Grade-IK was cancetled by order dated 10-7-2006 (P-6). 35 Shilcsha Karmi Grade-111 from the said list filed a writ petition, being Writ Petition No.3979 of 2006, before this Court. This Court, after having considered submissions ofthe parties in respect ofvalidity ofthe s.' appointment order dated 27-4-2006 (P-3), quashed the order dated 5-7- 2006 (P-7) passed by the Collector, District Jashpur, subject to condition ttiat the Cotlector shall re-examine the case of the petitionere in the light of the directfons made in the order dated 8-8-2006 (R-2) passed in Writ Petition No.3979 of 2006 and after examination, jf any irregularity is found in respect of the selection of the peUtioners, the Collector, District Jashpur was directed to pass appropriate order for cancellation ofappointment ofsuch candidates. 3. The present writ petition quesUons the validity of the same order, i.e., 5-7-2006 (P-7) and the consequent order dated 10-7-2006 (P-6), as the present petitioners are a part ofthe same orders. 4. Thus, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the case of Jagctlsh Prasad Yadav and offtere vs. State of ChhaWsgarh and ottiws (supra). No order as to costs. Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Gopal