/6. ali‘fer/ iia aTPuIasr siaafa 31w 226/227 m mi q‘ama 1%‘x‘1m, W Ifimm m W— W (5.1L) ma. 11m Iiimm $4 W. ma ~ m. W— W ($3.11.) W. Irrq tf’zmm, am. um tfimm W, a3 W. W— W (9.7L) mm HIGH CSURT OF CHHATT1S$ARH : EILASPUR WRST FETH‘mN (5} i‘\§0.7253 OF 2§0§ PET3T§€3NER > ' Raiesh Pa%r‘e ’ Versus REEPONBEN?S ' . iate Gf Chhamsgarh & athers 1 i1 ‘ ‘akit peii'tien under mticie 2251’22?’ cf me Cgnstitutien a? mdia) Sincje Bench : Ho!2"b§e Shr§ Satigh K. Qgnihcmi J. . Present :- Shri Shashi Kumar, caunsei fw the peii‘cioner. 55m Y5, Thakan By, Adv. Genera! far Ehe Smte. §R§ER $RAL3 e (‘Pas‘sed an th§$ 14 “ day'of Becember, 2963} 1. Wim "the censeni af ieemed couneei appeam‘ag fm the pafiies, the ee‘iiiien is heafd‘fmaiw. Ni Constitutien of :neia, Seeks a dkection ti.) the Birec’tcr, Panchayat & Seciai Wei‘i‘aa’e, wrecfci'aie, Raépur, m decide his pending agpea} within a pefiad 0f 65 days. The petiticaner aisa prays the“; ihe respandente NeA $9 £5 may be dimmed $0 iake " diecip§inary ac‘tiay". against the respendem Haa 3. Awarding is 3eamed ceunee? appearing hf the getitiener, ihe petmtme; wee remaved fmm the p034: a?“ Panchayat Secretary. Being aggxiev’ed by ’ihe remcvai weer, the eeimcner preferred a wri€ eet§ti0n before ihis Cauri: bemg WP. {S} No.é$25 of 2$9E {Ragesh Pave \i. Staa of Chhaiiisgarh & Gthere). 4. At ihe mation stage, by crder daied 248-21399 (Annexure —- Fm}, an ihe request m‘ ie‘ameé cauzasei Speeariag far the petmoner, the pét§tkmér Was gamed yermissim‘x {a3 w§thdraw i‘ ”the pe&it§on §.e. WP, (S) §49 4§2$ cf 23% WEh §%be{ty w %a§(e The getitioner, by this petmon unc§er £rtic§es 22$;‘227 ef ihe, recourse to the ccmpeteni auihority wider ’che provis§ons of the Chhattisgarh Pénchayat (Appeai & Revisian} Ruies, §9§5, §f so advised. 5. It appears that the petiiicner has, thereafter, f§§ed ar: agmeai before the Dire¢2or {Panchaya%) on 2-9-2GW (Annexai’e — FI2}. The p‘eii‘ticmr has mat thereafxer, taken any steps toexpetiite the pendmg appeai before €he Directcr; Evera otheawise what §s the status of apgeai, whemer noiice has been served am! whether case is ripe up for heaa'ing, has riot beer“. disciosed by the petitionef m this petmcn. 6. This Courf in exercise ofits writ jurisdiction under Articie 228/227 cf the Constitution of india canno‘t moni‘kor ihe praceedin'gs befere the authorities bemw. ” 7, it is wéli-waigh estabiished that the High Court in exemise o? its' extraordinarv .iurisdiction under Articie 22$ and supervisory iuriediction under Articie 227 oi'the Cansiitutian Of indi‘a, shouici refrain iiseii fmm iraiefi‘efiiig wi‘ih the owe! passed by the Comte beiow, except in such cases whea'e perversity; iiiegaiiiy, iriegdiai‘iiy 9r jurisdictionei ermi iswrit ‘1 large on the face o? the recerd, which is net in the piesem £a3e. in view of feregoing, the writ peii‘tien is devoid ef merii and is ccordingly dismissed ai the moticri stage itseii. x -_\ Sdl— a y ’1‘ } Satish K. Agnihot Judge Gewri '''é‘ir‘r ‘- a { : r