1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10484/2009 Taga Ram vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 6.1.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr.Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's contention is that only because of punishment of censure he has been denied promotion to the post of Superintendent of Police. It is also submitted that in some of the matters in these facts, the notices have been issued by this Court. It may be true that in some matters notices may have been issued when promotion was denied to the candidate because of imposing penalty of censure, but there is no reason for entertaining the writ petition as whenever that point will raised in those writ petition that issue can be considered. According to the petitioner, the censure cannot be ground for denial of promotion in view of the judgment of this court delivered in the case of Satyamani Tiwari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SBCWP No.2873/2003, decided 2 on 11.8.2006) and in Chandan Dan Vs. Director General of Police & Ors (SBCWP No.519/2008, decided on 5.5.2008). If the issue has been settled by this Court and the judgment is binding upon the tribunal then that is all the more necessary reason for availing the alternative remedy as the petitioner can get the relief in appeal and that will be in the spirit in which the tribunals have been constituted. In view of the above reasons, the writ petition is not entertained and the same is hereby dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. cpgoyal/-