IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT APPEAL No. Q3; /2010 APPEELANT agramjit Singh Shergill, S/o Shri (PETITIONER, Kulvinder Singh Shergill, aged about 2O years, R/o. gQuarter No. 1—A, Street—21, Sector—2, Bhiiaj, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS p-. RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanan (RESPONDENTS) 'Technical University, Through its Registrar, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) /~ 2. Bhilai Institute of Technology, through its Principal, Durg, District Durg (C.Gi) WRIT {APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE CHHATTISGARHE HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2006. fan , A“, d reserm r MP S Bhaha Advoca‘re for 1he appeHan M 'l’ r Yashwan'r Smgh Thnkur Advoca‘re fot‘ The respondems I M JUbeMEN Passed ro'n 28‘“ Arii,’ x ‘ 1 uddu ORAL T ( p 2010) . Qsi, J: ear- iarne counSe or fe ar-Ties a‘r en'l' . T p h f b h ll g h his wrl'r apeal as been iled y 1'e appean'l' aamsf 1'e Imuned order date 01 2 09 passe by Te learne lnle Judge m W P c) No 7024/0 . rief fnc'rs o The case are ‘l'a'r te pe'rl'I'Ioner/wrl‘r 'H f hl e appean'r who 1s s‘rudenf o Baceor of Engineering cours as no‘r ermlffed to aear m The exammahon of 6” w p pp € emesfer as acklo on fe roun Ta‘r he has nof passed 1 mi‘ o " es Ce 1O f 'dmance No 14 for B E 4 ear Degree course rowdes ‘r lcandlda‘re shal e eiile for admission 'ro V II d VII pdd h/ h d I II II & IV' s y eing‘a‘rived b Th said agfion‘ o The/resonen ive‘rsif *fe wrif'aelanf refered a wri‘: p‘'r'ih‘on wic was disosed of by fhls our‘r Vle orer a'fe 1 2 efalled repr pd y ho esen'ra'hon before fhe resonenf unwersu'r, w S bg h gd h fhe exanahon f 2d Semter as laus of hel Ol y p h l b lgb VI V d I semes'rers rovue eshe as passe I emes'l'ers respechvel H I u r l p p C d d dd 26 0 009 lerf In h a r‘ gl vmg ‘ l P ! ; f . Hd ed l f h p lgh $ fpg d 1 20 d h d Sfg ( 9 B f h h \ Bgge y e f pdf y h ppl pr f é hh l U d fo fe mke ro lby pe'h‘honer l x i X I x V furn direcfed ~fo decide fh‘e sn e expedifiously. The , represen'ra'hon submn‘fed by ‘rhe wrl of The order da'red 26 10 2009 responden'r universlfy Vlde order dafed 23 11 2009 wlfh an 1 observa‘hon Thu? fhe wm'l' appellam erem Is nof eligible 1'0 1 Z appear m the exammahon of 6*1' & h sames'l'ers Aggrwved Therewl‘rh fhe wm‘r appellan'r again filed a wrlf peh'hon ' before This Cour-T and the same u1as also dismissed Vlde o r dcrred 01 12 2009 which Is under challenge e mennhme 'rhe wrrr appeH‘anf passed fhe second: semes-rer and dur-mg The pendency of This wr-H appea! fhls Cour? VJde order da'ted 29 3 2010 dlrecfed +he responden‘rs i 1 +0 permlf fhe wrrl' appellanf ‘I’o appear m The slxfh semesTer " - examma‘hon wnh a condmon Tha'r his resul'r WIH be subJecf ‘ 1'o furfher orders of #h!s CourT and on fhe baSIs of this ' rm'rerum orderrfhe wrl‘r appeHant Is, appearmg In fheri ) x ‘appe‘ll‘anjf in comp ljgnce s dismissed by‘ ‘fhe exdmina‘l'ion of-si-xfh semesfer. 5.Accordmg fo 'rhe learned counsel for The responden'l'v und/erslfy 'rhere Is 'rhe sys'rem fha‘r s'rudenf who would be ellglble 'ro Take admlsslon m seven'rh semesfer fails m any ; , of fhe subJecTs of seven'rh semesfer he can agam appear m 1 fhaf subJecfs examination of sevenfh semesfer as backlog f“ w can‘dlda'l'e However wrl'h regard fo The appearance m fhe g examma'hon of eigh‘r semesl’er a sfudenf has fo appear as ' regular sfuden'r of sevenfh semesfer 6. Considering fhe‘ fac'i's and circumsfances of The case we dispose of 'rhis wrrr appeal fo fhe effeci- fhaf since 'rhe wrif l appellanf has been allowed 'ro appear In The exammaTIon of‘ sixTh semesTer as he has already passed exammaTion of e second semesTer his resulT of sixTh semesTer be declared In case The wrIT appellanT has noT been given admissmn m The sevenTh semesTer he shall be given admission In The ,, é ; ,‘ l n l I V. ~I .I ,i’ ' $w ~, x a 7 rdi h >. i sen1*h semes'rer- i,r iversi‘ry and allowed To aea ¥ seven'r semes'rer However If he Is no? successful m any o 'rhe papers of 'l'he sixfh semester he shall be l apear m Te examma‘hon of slxfh seesf f ar‘hcuar suJecl as acklo . ay' of m'rerlm order the wrif apellan‘l’ was ermi‘r'red T pear m Te erghT semesTer subecT To resulT of This wrIT ppea however smce The appearance/of The wrIT aellan eaTec as aerance ac‘ h e Tak!en regarding Te aearance o ihT semesTe eg r mpugne orer daTed 01 12 2009 assed b The learned inle Jue In W P c No 7024/09 T o above exTen i T 9. e wrIT appeal Is disposed of accorinl No order as T £’ U ‘ g __'r,he1 ndinan l, Ocas nf the in The eam'inafio z I xn o‘f': h f alowed fa € p h mer of hafh pl b bg B' iw p p o ap h J g al ppT ‘ Te eigT semesTer canno ho h‘oTice be} 'wrI aplaT n T m h h T be T ordance WIT The 0rdmance Therefor v/jgs;'/"l7~ .****. l sal- . “ .M.Qudd“s Judge 1‘" Sd/— ’rnt KumarMishr Judge é?i ki' nac¢_odahce wit uT ppr l l rl ppa m 3 h pp f eT pelh i he Id d p y Sg dg () ands modified T The 1 Th dgy o C Washa a ‘ j p ‘ ‘ r T