1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.86 of 2011 In Writ Petition No.2711 of 2008 (D) (Swapnil s/o Subhashrao Mankar v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Health, and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri R.A. Raulkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri D.B. Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri D.M. Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 8 th December, 2011 Respondent No.3 – Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Yavatmal, has filed an additional affidavit dated 17-11-2011, stating in para 6 as under : “6. I most humbly submit that as and when the post to be filled in from amongst the project affected persons falls vacant and if the petitioner is at serial No.1 in the list of such project affected persons maintained, the claim of the petitioner would be considered. The Hon'ble Court in the backdrop of the above referred facts as well as the stand taken by the respondent No.3 had been accepted by the Hon'ble Court and the petition 2 was disposed of.” In view of the aforesaid statement, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands satisfied. Hence, the contempt proceedings are dropped. Judge pdl