IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.688 of 2007 GIRINDRA KISHORE PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, Advocate Mr. Marut Nath Rai, Advocate -------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----------- Dated, the 5th September, 2008. This contempt application has been filed for alleged disobedience of the order dated 20th July, 2005. 2. By the order dated 20th July, 2005, the contempt application filed by the petitioner came to be disposed of thus: “In the facts of the case the only direction which this court proposes to pass is that said financial benefits be calculated and paid to the petitioner within a period of three months from date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It goes without saying that once the date of promotion of the petitioner has been shifted back for future promotion the aforesaid date has been treated as the date of promotion of the petitioner as Assistant Engineer. It has to be given full consequential effect. The contempt application is consigned and the rule issued against the opposite parties is discharged.” 3. The counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that promotion to the petitioner by shifting the date as directed in the order dated 14th July, 2003 ( L.P.A. No. 242 of 1997) has been given. He, 2 however, submits that the financial benefits accruing to the petitioner pursuant to the said order has yet not been given. 4. The government counsel submitted that by the end of September, 2008, consequential financial benefits shall be positively paid to the petitioner. 5. We accept the statement of the government counsel and in view thereof, we are satisfied that nothing further remains to be done in this MJC petition. 6. M.J.C. stands disposed of. R.M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/