IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23832 of 2009 FIROZ MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.11.2009 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. He has assisted the Court fully from the case diary called for. The Court has carefully gone through the allegations and the impugned order of rejection. The allegations against the petitioner are of throwing a bomb causing explosive injury. The order of rejection from Paragraph 83 of the case diary notices that the injuries were caused by explosive substance. Counsel for the State from the case diary points out that even after execution of distress warrant, the petitioner is evading arrest. The application is rejected. Let the case diary be returned to the Court below forthwith. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)