IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. f'B^S OF 200? PETITIONERS ^^'.- </:./ /^~ / y^?wf ^ f.r^~^ V/-*1 j^/ty\y1 4§y /^~T • ^- Smt. Sushma, wife of Ramesh Kumar, aged about 39 years, R/o Village and Post Sankra, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Smt. Murli, wife of Hemlal, aged about 35 years, R/o Bail Bazar, Near Bilaimata Mandir, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Uttam Kumar, son of Shri Gendram, aged about 24 years, R/o Ward No. 7, Jodhapur, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari -(C.G.) Murli, Son of Kishun Ram, aged about 39 years, R/o Village and Post Magarlod, District.Dhamtari (C.G.) Smt. Kaushilya, wife of Fagvaram, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Bhoyna, Post Achota, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Smt. Kavita, wife of Lileshwar, aged about 27 years, R/o Jagannath Chandel, Jaitkham Chowk, Jodhapur, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) L.... ^ RESPONDENTS 7. E. Savitri, wife of B. Keshav Rao, aged about 29years, R/o Village . and Post Magarlod, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 8. Badrinarayan, son of Tularam, aged about 40 years, R/o Village and Post Kukrel, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 9. Santosh Kumar, son of Gopal Ram, aged about 31 years, R/o Near Purana Mangal Bazar, Village and Post Kurud, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 10. Ayodhya Kumar, son of Roman Lal, aged about 32 years, R/o Near Gokulpur Chowk, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Though: the Tribal and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal and Schedule Caste Development, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector (Tribal Development), Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Dhamtari, Djstrict Dhamtari (C.G.) yyRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUE WRIT PETiTION (S) N0. 5303 OF 2009 PETITiONERS Smt. Sushma & Others RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petltion -under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Sattsh K. Agnlhotri, J. Present:- Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel for the petitioners. Ms Sunita Jain, Pansl Lawyer for the State. ('ORAU (Passed on this 17th day of September, 2009) Learned counsei appearing for the petltioners, on Instructions, submits that the petitioners seek permissjon of thls Court to withdraw thls petltion v^lth llbety to make a representation before the respondent- authoritles, to which tearned counsei appearing for the State has no objection. 2) it is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingiy, the writ petition is dlsmissed as withdravi/n with the aforesald liberiy. ___- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Gowri Jud8e u