1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAC) No.60 of 2011 In Civil Revision Application No.86 of 2011 (D) (Smt. Rashmi wd/o Rajendra Rajurkar v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Ms P.S. Mohagaonkar, Advocate for Applicant. Smt. I.L. Bodade, AGP for Non-Applicant No.1. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 29 th July, 2011 The learned counsel for the applicant has contended that in para 2 of the order dated 23-6-2011 passed by this Court in Civil Revision Application Stamp No.13024 of 2010, the date '19-3-2010' ought to have been as '7-5-2010'. Hence, the date '19-3-2010' be corrected as '7-5-2010' in the said order. The learned counsel has further contended that the judgment given by the Apex Court in Diwan Brothers v. Central Bank of India, reported in AIR 1976 SC 1503, has not been considered by this Court. The said judgment has been considered by this Court in identical Civil Revision Application No.67 of 2011 decided on 12-7-2011. In view of this, non-reference to the said judgment is of no consequence. 2 The civil application is disposed of accordingly. Judge pdl