1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3447 OF 2011 Purshottam Ganpat Nalavade .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/by Ms.Sharon Patole for the petitioner. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP for the State. Mr.S.P.Shastri, Assistant, Home Department, present. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 16th November, 2011. P.C.: 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the application preferred by the petitioner for extension of parole period has remain undecided, even though the extended parole period is likely to expire on 17.11.2011. 2. The learned APP on instructions states that the petitioner’s application will be considered on its own merits, in accordance with law, before expiry of the prevailing parole period, and the order so passed will be communicated to the petitioner forthwith, so that the petitioner can act on the said order. 2 3. In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition and the same is disposed of. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)