IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2007 / 25TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 30763 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAJARAM S., KEERTHANAM, EREZHA SOUTH, CHETTIKULANGARA P.O.,ALLEPPEY DISTRICT, PIN : 690 106. BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND SMT.A.B.SHRILATHA SRI.JOVY GEORGE VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM,PIN:673 635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. PIN: 673 635 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673 635. BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 30763 OF 2007 K ===================== Dated this the 17th day of October, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a B.Tech student, who had applied for revaluation of his three papers of 8th semester examination. In view of the delay in the revaluation and declaration of results, he has submitted Ext.P2 representation as well. Even thereafter, since there was no progress in the matter, this writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned standing counsel for the University also has been heard in the matter. 3. Now the petitioner submits that application has been made, about which mention has been made in Ext.P2 representation also, an expeditious completion of revaluation and declaration of results is called for. This is particularly so in the light of Ext.P1 offer of employment, which has been produced before this Court. 4. Taking into account the circumstances as detailed WPC 30763/07 : 2 : above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondents to initiate and complete the process of revaluation and declare the results, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the application made by the petitioner is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp