IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28647 of 2011(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. VINOD KUMAR.V.B, VINOD BHAVAN, T.C.16/398(2), SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAPAZHANJI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VIPIN.V.B, VINOD BHAVAN, T.C.16/398(2), SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAPAZHANJI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THYCAUD (PO), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, FORT (PO), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV WPC.NO.28647/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : P1 : COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED DATED 07.07.2011. P2 : COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 18.07.2011. P3 : COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC.NO.19649/2011 DATED 20.07.2011. P4 : COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC.NO.19649/2011 DATED 29.07.2011. P5 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 26.08.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE AV ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28647 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T On acquiring property as per Ext.P1, petitioners submitted an application before the first respondent for its mutation. Orders were not passed despite Ext.P5 reminder. It is complaining of the above this writ petition is filed. 2. Case of the petitioner is that their application for mutation is pending before the first respondent. In view of the said assertion, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the said application, for mutation of the property covered by Ext.P1 and pass orders thereon. This shall be done by the first respondent at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-