c •^ 'l®^'' INTHEHIGHCOURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH y\ >.-""%RiT RETITION. N0. OF 2005 <y^[^a^Illlu"'""' ^-^^^•'..••••" ^>-"".^"'> I'.y" BETWEEN : ^^••''' , "a"m^.^' ^ x^""" „ .„..„, . . „. ... . . . „ . rayan Prasad Gabel S/o Late Shri Manohar Lal Gabel, aged about 42 years, occupation serviee, posted as RuralAgriculture Extension Officer, Office ofthe Assistant Project Officer Agriculture, Sakti, District Janj^Champa (CG). PETITIONER -^ ^. /^' <?^i AND ^£TheStateofGhhattisgarh, •,]!. Through fhe Secretary'Elepartment ofAgriculture , Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.Buildihg, Raipur(G.G.) ^2. The Deputy Director, Agriculture, Janjgir Champa , District Janjgir Champa' (CG). -^3. Director, Agriculture, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). ^ CollectorJanJgirGhampa (CG). ^'s^'i ' RESPONDENTS WRn- PETmONXJNDERARnCLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OFINOIA ^faBlimwfJ XI-HC-22 ^NaRR^ 'STftS'1'?, I»iCTI'«i< an^T'qiT. R;-ii>ti sn^y ^^TF^ -("tiSff !/ v ^ ^it^^ KiyWF 9)q|i:b 25 •sn^T?^iTW; r 9-12-2005 Shri SuFiil'Sahu, eounsel fbrthe Shri VivekSharma, F'anei Lawyej Heard/ ;' . LeaFnea.oounsei fof tne petitiorji been transferred from Sakti. Disinci , dated 27-10-2005 •(Annexure-P/1), i-ie transfeFred during :the Dan'period tl~>at ti ofthe Ghief hflinister. Learned counsel the presSnt ends of justice wii! •be serv^a ji a directidn is'giveh to tne [espondent gfievances befoje the comp'etent autho represeniation being ffled, the competer| the same on its own merits in accoraant avaiiable undertne law. Learned pounsel for..triepeiitior|' notbeen .relieved; :Meprays,forgrantof| in viev/ of ihe:aboye,' it is direel may E>e allowed'to contiTiuetlit'me reprei ' Withthe.aforesaidobseFvatidns,! cb l<f[<;l*Ht ^l*-lflf ^ l^<<l,<P>t'^l< ^? 3if:g*i SII^T tetitiooer. ier submits'that 8a«isr:tne,petitioner.has lanjgir-Ghampa. to. Amfiikapur vide,order: |atso submits that the petitioner has been: )o witFiout coorainatio'n ana pnor approval. ppeaFing Tor .the pet.itioneF submits that tor )t tne petitloner. ytateoounsei. authorities to deGia'e the representation l ne-prayer is not opposed oytnq i-iavin'g eons.idered andwithout ^xpre'ssing anyopinjon'on.the merits gfthe case the petitioner, is directed' to..maj<e a. detailed representatipn raising his Ity of Fespondents aiongwith a co'py iof tne petjtion and this ;order:within a^peric^! QT' 15 days from.tocfay"arid''qn'such t.autnority or the responaeFits shali: decide ;e with iaw as eariy as possibie preferably wifhin a perjod of;tw6 momhsfFbm the (fatedfreceiptof representation. it is ^m 'clear that1 if any: grieVance :still remaitis', the petmoner may avail.the remedy T submits t'nat tiii date the'petitioneF h'as nienmTelieT. ed t'nat if.ihe petitioner is not feiieved he ientation isdecided. . ,'• -.' this petition.s'tands .djsposed of. Consequentjy, ]vi.<W.).P.No,46'^/20e)5 '&U.A.NQ.9771/2005 also .Stana aisposed or. :- . : : . L ::;'^':. Certified copy asperruies-: i ' ' „ . r~ . .. 1 Fakhruddin i Judge