IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER TUESDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2008 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 14220 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. REJOMA, W/O ANIL KUMAR, AGED 29 YEARS, THEKKEKARAYIL, PADINJATTUMCHERY THEKKEMURI, VAIKOM VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. 2. ANILKUMAR, S/O GOPI, AGED 34 YEARS, THEKKEKARAYIL, PADINJATTUMCHERI THEKKEMURI, VAIKOM VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.NANDANAN SRI.P.N.ANOOP RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. VAIKOM MUNCIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, VAIKOM MUNICIPALITY, VAIKOM. 2. CHAIRMAN, VAIKOM MUNICIPALITY, VAIKOM. 3. SECRETARY, VAIKOM MUNICIPALITY, VAIKOM. BY ADV.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER, J. ====================================== WRIT PETITION NO.14220 OF 2008 ====================================== Dated this the 6th day of May 2008 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondents/Municipality. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is prepared to approach the Tribunal for the Kerala Local Self Government Institutions against Ext.P7 order. However his apprehension is that in the meanwhile, Ext.P7 order may be implemented and petitioner may be evicted. He, therefore, prays that some breathing time may be granted to the petitioner in order to enable him to prefer the appeal before the Tribunal without facing the threat of eviction. There is some force in the above contention. 3. In the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal and prefer an appeal against Ext.P7 order. 4. Petitioner may prefer the appeal within three weeks from today. Operation and implementation of Exts.P4 and P7 orders shall remain stayed till May 27, 2008. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE css/