IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8941 of 2008 Between: Endluru Gram Panchayat, rep by its Sarpanch, Patibandla Balaswamy, Endluru [V], S.N.Padu Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Sub-Division-II, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 Deputy Exective Engineer, Panchayat Raj Sub-Division-II, Ongole, Prakasam District. 4 Assistant Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Sub- Division-II S.N.Padu[M], Prakasam District. 5 Chaitanya Dwacra Group-II, Endluru rep by its Group Leader, Smt, K.Nayamma, Endluru Village, S.N.Padu Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: AGP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8941 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus or any writ, order or direction with the following substantive relief:- “to declare the proceedings in RC.No.AE.1/191/06, dt.05.03.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violative of the order of this Hon’ble Court, dated 27.07.2007 in W.P.No.11939 of 2007 and G.O.Ms.No.37 issued by Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (proceedings.IA) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, dt.18.02.2005 and oﬀends Articles 14, 21 and 243-G of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to entrust the said work to Habitation Works Committee formed by the petitioner Gram Panchayat for execution, and pass such other orders or order as this Hon’ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri C.Ramachandra Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.11847 of 2008 is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 21.10.2008 v v