hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2007 Bhavarlal B.Jain ... Petitioner Versus The State of Mah. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.M. Sarogi with Mr. .N.P. Bhavsar for Petitioner. Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 20, 2008 DATED: NOVEMBER 20, 2008 DATED: NOVEMBER 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. We have also considered the reliefs prayed therein. Admittedly in terms of the reliefs itself, the Petitioner is no longer in possession of the premises which were public premises inside Railway yard. According to learned counsel there is an order of civil court in his favour. If that be so, and if the order of the Civil Court has been violated, the petitioner has remedy by way of moving under Order 39 Rule 2A of the C.P.C. Once the Petitioner has efficacious remedy against the purported acts of respondents, it will not be appropriate for this court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Apart from that we find that there are disputed questions. It can be noted that according to Petitioner, after being dispossessed, Sulabh Shauchalaya has been constructed in front of the said premises. . The disposal of this petition will not stand in the way of the Petitioner seeking whatever other remedies he has at law. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)