} IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S! N0.Bug OF 2010 PETITIONER : R.C Lahri S/o Late Shri L.R Lahri, aged about 50 §;rs, Presently working as Sub Inspector Police Station Tikarapara, Raipur Resident of Village Mohlai, P.S. Berla, Teh. Dharndha, District Durg (C.G) Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Director General of Police, PoliCe Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Inspector General of Police , Raipur range ,Raipur (CG). Superintendent of Police District Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner, above named, most humhlv and w / h Versus RESPONDENTS : /. l. State ‘ of Chhattisgarh, Through thel Secretary, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.1943 OF 2010 PETITIONER R.C. Lahri Versus RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. State of Chhattisgarh & Others - Present :— Shri Shashank Thakur & Shri Arvind Dubey, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. Advocate General with Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 26m day of April, 2010) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned transfer order was passed on 7/11/2009 (Annexure P- 1). No effect was given to the impugned transfer order after about five months. Thereafter, aii of a sudden by order dated 15/4/2010 (Annexure P-2), the petitioner was relieved and directed to join the new place of posting as ordered on 7/11/2009. Learned counsel further submits the administrative exigency has been diluted on account of the fact that during five months several representations have been made and without any rhyme and reason several orders have been cancelled. Accordingly, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 19/11/2009 and 17/4/2010, in accordance with law, as early as possible. \\ \\ \ \\ my: .\ Gowri 2) Shri Moorthy, learned Dy. Advocate General, appearing with Shri Roy, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that the pending representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with Iaw and on its own merits, as early as possible preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner till the disposal of his pending representations._/l SATISH K. AGNn-IOTRI Judge r