IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16091 of 2009 1. AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY PRASAD 2. Maksudan Prasad 3. Devi Narayan Prasad Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 14.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners have been alleged for demanding ransom and kidnapping of complainants’ younger brother, even according to the learned A.P.P., there was previous enmity in between the parties due to filing of the case at petitioners’ hand against the complainant as Manapur P.S. Case no. 66 of 2006. A certified copy of subsequent case filed on behalf of the complainant is submitted to show that how the complainant is engaged in misdeeds by filing the cases involving family members of his cousin making false allegation i.e., Complaint Case no. 2970 of 2008. So, in my view also rejection of anticipatory bail basing the allegation levelled in the complaint petition is not justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Trial No. 3298 of 2008 arising out of Complaint Case No. 738 of 2006, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jai Ram Prasad, J.M., Ist Class, Muzaffarpur 2 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)