1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.3958 of 2008 [Municipal Council, Pusad Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.D. Wakode, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. ----- CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND A.H. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 07th October,2008. Heard. This petition on behalf of the Municipal Council has been filed by its President, and the petitioner prays for quashing and setting aside the communication dated 14th March, 2007 issued by the Asstt. Director, Town Planning, Yavatmal, whereby he expressed and communicated the inability on behalf of the Govt., to provide financial assistance to the petitioner for acquisition of a plot of land reserved in the Development Plan, and in the alternative, the petitioner prays for a direction to decide the representation dated 3rd March, 2008 submitted to the Govt. of Maharashtra. 2 We have no doubt in our mind that the petition is ill-conceived, and we do not find any fault in the communication dated 14th March, 2007, issued by the Asstt. Director, Town Planning, Yavatmal. The communication refers to an order passed by this Court whereby the entire amount of compensation was directed to be deposited by the Municipal Council as there is no provision to grant financial assistance in such cases. If the petitioner-Municipal Council has submitted a representation dated 3rd March, 2008, it is for the State Govt., to consider it, and the said representation being not based on any statutory provision, it will not be proper for us to direct the State Govt. to decide the same within a fixed period. It is for the petitioner-Municipal Council to persuade the State Govt., to decide this representation earlier. In the circumstances, Writ Petition is rejected. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3