1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1223 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1494 OF 2008. Ganpat Baban Mhatre : Appellant versus Chandrakant Kaluram Patil and anr. : Respondents. Shri. Samir Vaidya for the Appellant. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : JANUARY 05, 2009 P.C. 1. The above Appeal, filed by the original Defendant, arises out of the order dated 29th May 2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel on the Application Exhibit-5 filed by the Respondent No.1/Plaintiff. The Appellant also challenges the order dated 16/07/2008 whereby police protection has been granted to the Respondent No.1 for implementation of the order dated 29th May 2008. 2 2. The learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions of the Appellant, who is personally present in Court, makes a statement that the Appellant would be satisfied if the Application Exhibit-5, which is as yet pending, is directed to be heard and disposed of within a particular time frame. 3. Considering the nature of the dispute, the request is reasonable. Looking to the direction sought, notice to the Respondents is not necessary.The hearing of the Application Exhibit- 5 filed in S.C.S 329 of 2008 pending on the file of the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, is expedited and is directed to be disposed of by 15th February 2009. The above Appeal is accordingly disposed of. In view of the disposal of the above Appeal, the Civil Application does not survive and is disposed of as such. [R.M.SAVANT, J]