1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO. 195 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO. 195 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO. 195 OF 2006 IN MISC. PETITION (L) NO. 45 OF 2006 Mrs. Mary Kamala William Manuel D’souza ... Appellant Versus Mr. Aloysius Manuel D’Souza and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Anil V. Anturkar with Mr. R.D. Suryavanshi for the Appellant. Mr. C.S. Balsara with Mr. Deepak Singh i/by K. Ashar & Co. for R. Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 03, 2006 DATED : APRIL 03, 2006 DATED : APRIL 03, 2006 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. . The major grievance of the appellants before this court is that the interim relief was heard without pleadings being complete and as such the appellants before it had no full opportunity of meeting the contentions as urged on behalf of the Respondents. It is pointed out that when the matter was heard, it was not on the board but was 2 taken up on board. . It is not necessary for this court to go into the various contentions as urged before this court. Suffice it to say that the order dated 25.1.2006 can be treated as ad interim order. The appellant before this court to complete their pleadings. It will thereafter be open to the learned Judge to dispose of the application for interim relief according to law. In the meantime, order dated 25.1.2006 to continue. The learned Judge is requested to dispose of the application for interim relief at the earliest. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)