1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.112/2003. (Shri Amolak Jain Vs. State of Mah. and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.NE Deshmukh, Adv. h/for Mr. SB Talekar, Adv. for petitioner. Mr.DV Tele, AGP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 18 th January, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The directions dated 10.10.2002 (para 9 of the said order) read as under : “9.In the result, the petition is allowed. The order dated 1.1.2001 passed by Respondent no.1 bearing No.STC-1000/WP-256/2000/CE.3 issued by Higher and Technical Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, is hereby quashed and set aside. We direct the respondent no.1 to issue certificate in favour of the petitioner showing and declaring the petitioner as a minority institution under Article 30 of the Constitution of India. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.” 3) The learned Counsel submits that this order of giving minority institution status is not complied with in its letter and spirit by the Government. 4) During the course of submission, it revealed that such certification is 2 issued time to time after the orders of the Division Bench of this court and the Counsel informs that such recognition is valid even till March 2010. The request for perpetual recognition, cannot be directed or treated to be in breach of order dated 10.10.2002. 5) No merit in the Contempt Petition, it is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/cp112.03