T 1 £, BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR. WP(C ) No... .4^.^...... ./2010 Petitioners: Murii Sahu, S/o Shiv Charan Sahu, Aged 45 years R/o Datranga(Vill & PO). Raipur, Tahsil. Raipur Dist, CG State. Versus Respondents: '^y A ^ ,-'0 ,.-;' ^" ^ /' ^•\f: /-" ^ 2. y 3. State of C.G. Through:Commissioner (Land Records) Raipur, RaipurDist, CG State The District Collector, Raipur, Raipur Dist, CG State. Tahsildar, Raipur, Raipur Dist, CGState. ^•y >^ i>D , JK.S.^ . ^ /</' <:^y.-" 4. Bhuneswar Sahu, S/o Late AqandRam Sahu., Aged 48 years. 5.' Jeevan Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Dukhu Ram Sahu, Aged about 48 years, 6. Smt Rupa Bai, W/olateAdhari, ^ Aged about 46 years, 7. Smt Pushpa Bai, W/o Late Narain Singh, Aged about 50 years 8. Tikam Sahu, S/o Tula Ram Sahu,. Aged 56 years. "7 .3T^ ^. ^^^^^^ ^ r/°y3e^ ^^ \ Tfry^'^l i' •t^^,/fw. ^^^ ZAS ^ h^^'^y^ %s./r^ v^"^ ^•-•^r^^ Kj^^ 9^ KomeLalSahu, S/o Late Daya Ram Sahu. Age not known to Petitioner 10/ RohitSahu, S/o Late Ganesh Ram Sahu Age not known to petitioner 11 TejRamSahu. S/o Late Ganesh Ram Sahu Aged 52 years. 12|f Ramswaroop Sahu, S/o Late Shiv Charan Sahu, 41 years, 13.( Premu Sahu, S/o Late Shiva Charan Sahu, Aged about 37 years. / 141 Bhanu Pratap Sahu, S/o Late Shiv Charan Sahu, Aged about 42 years 15^ UdayRamSahu, S/o Late Dukhu Ram Sahu Aged Late 39 years. .€ 16. Ram Krishna Sahu, S/o Late Dukhu Ram Sahu, Aged about 51 years. 17 KhanyiahSahu S/o Dukh Ram Sahu Aged 49 years. 1^.. Dhan Prasad Sahu,. S/o Dukhu Ram Sahu Aged 38 years. 1^. Khuman Sahu, S/o Late Dukhu Ram Sahu, Agedabout 34years, 20. Smt. Punia Bai, W/o LateGirdhari, Aged about 38 years, 1 21. Foolwasan Bai, W/o Late Puna Ram, Aged 33 years. 22. BirdhhuRam. S/o Late Baghela Gond, Aged34years. 23. r Budhan Gond. S/o Shri Katgalu Gond, Aged39years. (All R/o Village Datranga Raipur, Tahsil. Raipur Dist, CG State.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITSfSI ORDERrSI DIRECTlONfSI ETC. ^•Zw.'^^:-^^^^'^...,^. ^^..aww»»wwss«se^»sws.-;. w^.^s^^.^.^..^-:^^.. ^:& fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitfonf0 No. 4900/2010 PETITIONER : MurBSahu Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Oihattisgarh & Ors. Aopearaaice: Shri K.R. Nair with Miss. Veena Nair, counsel for the petitioner. Miss. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for fhe State. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE coNSTmmoN OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (30.08.2010) The only prayer made by the petitioner in this writ petition is for issuance of writ of mandamus, Gommanding the respenctents to obey and compty with tfae orders passed and directi<Mis issued oa 9/03/2010 by the Board ofRevenue in thrir favour. (2) Section 8 of the C.G. Land Revenue Cod®,1959 reads as under: **8. Powers of Miperintendaice of Board- The Board shall, in respect of all matters subject to its appellate or revisicBtml jurisdietion, have superintendence over all authorities in so far as such authorities deal with such matters and may eall for retums." (3) In view of Ifae provisions the Board of Rwenue has supervisoiy power over its suboidinate revaiue authorities over ^which it exercises its revisional and i^pellate powers. •^^^.^ 2- ^ (4) In view of the above, the petitioner has an altemative remedy ofapproaching the Board of Revenue invoking itsjurisdiction undw section 8 ofthe code. The instant petition is tkus premature and not maintaiaable. (5) The petitioner, if so advised, may approaeh the Board of Revenue seeking indulgence ofthe said autiiority to exeeute its own order dated 9/03/2010 (Annexiire P-1). (6) Wifh this observation, Ae petition stands disg)osed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge