IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9691 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ABDUL LATHEEF, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.UMMER, MANAKKATT HOUSE, HIDAYATH NAGAR, H.M.T.COLONY, KALAMASSERRY, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE KALAMASSERRY MUNCIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KALAMASSERRY. 2. ABBAS, AGED 45, S/O.MUHAMMED, MANAKKATT HOUSE, H.M.T.COLONY, KALAMASSERRY, ERNAKULAM. 3. DRIVE INDIA ENTERPRISES SOLUTIONS LIMITED, XI/433-D, SEA PORT AIR PORT ROAD, KALAMASSERRY, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, MOORTHY. SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 9691 OF 2010 (J) ===================== Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is that although under the orders of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions dated 23/4/2009, the proceedings against the 2nd respondent ought to have been completed by now, the 1st respondent is not taking any expeditious action. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent has obtained instructions and submits that based on the directions of the Tribunal, notice has been issued, the party has appeared and has been partly heard. It is submitted that the proceedings will be completed on an expeditious basis and concluded at any rate within 4 weeks from today. I feel the submission thus made by the standing counsel should redress the grievance of the petitioner. Therefore, recording the submission as above, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp