IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20082 of 2006 Date of Decision : 18.12.2006 Gursewak Singh and another ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others. .. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Baljit Puri, Advocate, for the petitioners. J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners is based on the fact that the petitioners have not been allowed to discharge their duties after 31.01.2005. It is the also contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners, that salary of the petitioners, for some period, has remained unpaid. We are of the view, that an efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioners under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioners, if they be so advised, may seek redressal of their grievances under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, or any other remedy, as they may choose, in accordance with law. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge December 18, 2006 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge