THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4372 OF 2007 DT.17.06.2010 Between : Mandavalli Hema ...PETITIONER A N D Mandavalli Bhimsankara Prasad and others. …RESPONDENTS ORDER: This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 22.06.2007 passed in I.A.No.271 of 2006 in O.P.No.576 of 2004 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, whereunder and whereby the application filed by the petitioner wife under Order VII Rule 11 (3) of C.P.C., seeking to reject O.P.No.576 of 2004 filed by the first respondent husband was dismissed. Heard Sri P.Satyanarayana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri M.Balanaga Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. O.P.No.576 of 2004 was filed by the husband seeking maintenance from his wife on the ground that he is deaf and dumb and also claimed damages of Rs.25,00,000/- from his in-laws. As against the filing of the said O.P., the petitioner filed I.A.No.271 of 2006 seeking to reject the O.P. Basing on the respective submissions made by the respondents therein, the court below did not find favour with the petitioner and thereby dismissed the application. Hence, the present revision petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel and perusing the material available on record, it is seen that no other reasons are sought to be assigned by the petitioner in the application, which falls within the parameters as contemplated under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. The request of the petitioner has to be enquired into on merits. Hence, it cannot be said that the O.P., is not maintainable. In the circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order under revision. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the objections and the same shall be considered by the court below in a more apt and appropriate manner. No costs. _____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J JUNE 17, 2010 YVL/TJS