In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 7479 of 2009 (O&M) Sant ... Petitioner. vs Rampat and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Arvind Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. C. B. Goel, Advocate, for respondent no. 1. Rajesh Bindal J. On 24.12.2009 at the time of hearing, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 had raised a preliminary objection that all the persons who were co- defendants in the suit have not been impleaded as respondents in the present petition. Initially though the suit was filed impleading only two defendants i.e. respondents no. 1 and 2, however, subsequently the persons claiming themselves to be effected by the suit filed by the petitioner-plaintiff, filed application for their impleadment which was allowed on 17.8.2001 and at present there are 69 defendants in the suit out of which only two have been impleaded. The case was adjourned as the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to seek instructions from the petitioner. Today learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that inspite of his communication, the petitioner has not responded. Considering the fact that all the defendants who were party before the court below have not been impleaded as respondents in the present petition, the petition is dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties. 9.2.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge