IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 4906 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: December 13, 2011 Estate Officer, HUDA, Jind .. Appellant Vs. Suresh Kumar and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the appellant. A.N. Jindal, J Having lost before both the courts below, the appellant- defendant has preferred this regular second appeal. The appeal being delayed by 376 days, is accompanied by an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay, on the ground that appellate court passed the judgment and decree dated 1.6.2011 but the certified copy of the same was received by the office of the Estate Office, HUDA on 3.11.2011. It is due to the mistake on the part of the counsel and the delay caused in filing the appeal is not intentional or willful. Having heard the rival contentions, no sufficient grounds are made out for condoning the 376 days' delay. Consequently the instant miscellaneous application is dismissed. Resultantly, the accompanying appeal also fails. December 13, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge