CWP (T) 2892/2008 29.7.2010 Present:- Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.D.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Respondents No. 2 to 13 served. But, none appears on their behalf. They are proceeded ex-parte. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has stated that the present petition is covered by judgment dated 11.5.2009 in CWP (T) No. 2893/2008. He has submitted that Annexure A-10 in the present petition was also assailed in CWP (T) 2893/2008, which has been quashed in CWP (T) No. 2893/2008 on 11.5.2009 with a direction to the Chairman/Secretary of the Board to decide the representation of petitioner in that petition within 8 weeks from the date of judgment. It has been submitted that in the present case also, representation, Annexure A-9 is pending and has not yet been decided. This statement of learned Counsel for the petitioner has not been denied by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1. In these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of judgment dated 11.5.2009 in CWP (T) No. 2893/2008 and Annexure A-10 is quashed. The Chairman/Secretary of respondent No.1 is directed to decide the representation, Annexure A-9, dated 20.10.1994 by a speaking order in 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, which shall be furnished by petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to supplement the representation, Annexure A-9 in view of subsequent developments. In case, representation is supplemented, then the Chairman/Secretary shall also take into consideration such representation and decide the same by adverting to the submissions made in that representation also. Copy dasti. July 29, 2010 ( Kuldip Singh ) (pankaj)