THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2129 of 2009 9th October 2009 Between: Gosula Koteswaramma, W/o.China Veera Reddy, 45 years, Occ.House Wife, R/o.Bondillipalem, Gilakaluripet Town and Mandal, Guntur District. …PETITIONER AND Nidamanuri Ravi Kumar, S/o.Gopalakrishna Murthy, 32 years, R/o.High School Road, Chilakaluripet Town and Mandal, Guntur District. …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2129 OF 2009 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that at the time of allowing the application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, for sending the suit pronote to the Handwriting Expert, while holding that the same need not be send to the Handwriting Expert, the Court below directed the parties to file memos stating their respective experts, on the basis of which the pronote can be send. The observation of the Court below to send the said document to any other Expert other than the Government Expert, according to the petitioner, is absolutely warranted and hence, the revision. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, there is no reason to establish either way as to why the document cannot be sent to the Government expert to make such exercise. There is also no serious objection on the part of the respondent herein for sending the document to the Government Expert. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order observing that the document need not be sent to the Government Expert is set aside. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 9th October 2009 RRB