THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.NO.23489 OF 2005 Dt.2.11.2005 Between: K.Satyanarayana … Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 4 others. … Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. The grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to the complaint made by the 4th respondent against the son of the petitioner, the petitioner is being harassed by the police officials and therefore, he seeks writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in harassing the petitioner and his family members as illegal and arbitrary. I do not see any material that goes to show that the son of the petitioner is being harassed. If there is any harassment pursuant to the complaint filed by the 4th respondent against the son of the petitioner, he being a major, he can as well protect his right. I am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to seek writ of mandamus in the absence of any material that his son is being harassed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ (V.ESWARAIAH, J.) 2.11.2005 kpr