IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.444 of 2008 MAHENDRA PRASAD SINHA, son of Shree Suraj Prasad, resident of Mohalla-Dhirachak, Anishabad, P.SD. Gardanibag, in the town and district of Patna-2. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna-800001. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special secretary-cum-Commissioner, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Public Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna (Design and Planning Division), Patna, Circle No.2. 6. The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (Design & Planning Division-6), Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 7. Executive Engineer, Bihar Rajya Jal Parshad, Ganga Project, Division-2, Patna Beur. 8. The Executive Engineer, Public Health & Engineering Department, Bhagalpur. 9. The Director, Provident Fund Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna. 10. Post Master, Head Post Office, Bhagalpur. ---Respondents ----------- 4. 5.4.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The grievances of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of March, 2007 from the post of Clerk while working under respondent no.6, his pension is not correctly fixed since, according to him, his pension ought to be Rs.6,000/- per month instead of Rs.5805/- for the simple reason that one similarly placed, namely, Paltan Ram, who is junior to him, as would be appearing from the seniority list dated 5.8.1987, as contained in Annexure 1, is receiving Rs.6000/- per month as pension and as such the above 2 discrepancy in the payment of pension needs to be re-examined. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the petitioner has not given the relevant details to enquire the above allegation. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, P.H.E.D. (Design & Planning Division-6), Patna (respondent no.6). In case such a representation is filed stating the aforesaid grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be redressed at the earliest and the admitted dues may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if the claim of the petitioner is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)