IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 299 OF 1997 DR. WILFRED M. MESQUITA, PANAJI ....Petitioner GOA. Versus THE NORTH GOA PLANNING AND ....Respondent DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, PANAJI GOA. Mr. S. Vales, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hanumant Naik, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- P.V. KAKADE, J. Date:- 13th November, 2006 P.C. Heard Counsel for both the parties. The petition was filed for not initiating action against the persons who were in illegal occupation, in violation of the orders of this Court regarding second lift shaft in a building at Panaji. However, today the statement is made on behalf of the petitioner supported by an application on record, which is taken on record and marked "X" for identification, that necessary action has been taken by the respondent-the alleged contemner i.e. the Member Secretary, North Goa Planning and Development Authority and, therefore, he seeks to withdraw the petition. 2. In view of the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. P.V. KAKADE, J. ssm.