IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 995 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- ZAVERBEN NAVINBHAI SHAH Versus DINESH DEUMAL HARANI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR CL SONI for Applicant No. 1 MS KHYATI P HATHI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 16/10/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The present Revision Application is filed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Gandhidham-Kutch on 14.08.2001, below an application Ex.28, in Civil Suit No.5 of 2001, wherein the amendment prayed for by the plaintiff - respondent was granted. The impugned order is an interim order and the main Civil Suit is still pending before the trial Court. In view of the provision under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, the present Revision Application is not maintainable and hence, it is rejected. It is, however, open to the applicant to challenge the impugned order before this Court by way of Special Civil Application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue for the period of two weeks from today. 2. With the above observations, the present Revision Application is rejected. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. Sd/- [ K.A.PUJ,J ] 'Bhavesh'