IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.182 of 2009 1. Smt. Bina Devi wife of Sri Saryug Singh 2. Jay Chandra Singh son of Sri Laxman Singh, both residents of mohalla Sikandarpur, Police Station Mozahidpur, District Bhagalpur… …Intervenors…Petitioners. Versus 1. Lokesh Shukla son of Girja Shankar Shukla, resident of mohalla Sikandarpur, Police Station Mozahidpur, District Bhagalpur… Plaintiff 2. The State of Bihar through the Collector, Bhagalpur, Police Station and District Bhagalpur…Defendant..Opposite Parties. … 3 16.02.2009 Heard Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 19.12.2008 passed by the Sub-Judge III, Bhagalpur in Title Suit No. 7 of 2007, whereby the petition filed by the petitioners under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for impleading them as party defendants in the suit has been rejected by the court below. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had purchased considerable part of the land from one Manju Devi wife of one Shyam Bihari Shukla, who had been allotted the property appertaining to khata no. 833 plot no. 676 in partition, and on that pretext they want to be added as party defendants in the suit. 2 The trial court while dealing with this matter has come to the conclusion that the plaintiff had filed this suit against the State of Bihar for correction in survey khatian, because the land has been entered therein as “Anawad Bihar Sarkar” and after comparing the boundaries of the plot, it has come to the conclusion that the land claimed by the petitioners is not in dispute in the present title suit and, thus, has held that the petitioners are not necessary parties to be added in the suit. In that view of the matter, I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. As a result, this civil revision application is dismissed. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)