(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 10681 OF 2010 Raghuveer s/o. Laxmansing Pardeshi, Age : 65 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Nagardevala, Taluka : Pachora, District : Jalgaon, and another. .. Petitioners. versus The State of Maharashtra, Through the Collector, Jalgaon, District : Jalgaon, and 4 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. Pramod P. Dhorde, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3. ........................ (2) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. An application moved by the petitioners under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in Regular Civil Suit No. 5/2000, has been rejected on 16-9-2010. 2. Mr. P.P. Dhorde, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, contends that share of petitioners will be affected if the suit is allowed to be decided without joining the petitioners as party. He has also pointed out that in plaint paragraph 5, ownership of the petitioners to the well and water therein is accepted. 3. The very fact that the plaintiff accepts ownership of the petitioner in the well and water clearly shows that he is not seeking any relief against the petitioner. The trial court has also given very same finding. I, therefore, fail to understand how rights of the petitioners can be affected in that suit. (3) 4. As no prejudice is caused to the petitioners, in any way, the petition is not entertained and it is disposed of accordingly. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp10681