IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 4575 of 2009. Date of Decision: 30th March, 2009. Ashok Kumar Pathania & Anr. ...Petitioners through Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate Versus The Executive Engineer, Public Health & Anr. Respondents through Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioners seek a direction for restoration of their water connection in the residential premises and refund of the alleged excess payments received from them towards water charges. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, the respondents have put in appearance. It is not in dispute that in deference to the interim order dated 23.3.2009, the water connection at the petitioners' residential premises has been restored. As regards their claim for the refund of the alleged excess payments made from 2001 onwards, suffice it to say that the petitioners' complaints including dated 19.4.2007 followed by reminder dated 19.12.2007 are still pending consideration before the respondent authorities. C.W.P. No. 4575 of 2009 -2- The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to determine the petitioners' claim as contained in the aforementioned complaints by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from today. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they may approach the appropriate forum. Disposed of. March 30, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE