IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 245 of 2008(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4528/2008 Dated 13/02/2008 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------- SECRETARY, AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, P.O. AVINISSERY. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL SRI.M.R.DHANIL RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER: ------------------------ PRADEEP PAUL, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. K.A. KUNJIPALU, MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOTEL SALKARA RESIDENCY PVT. LTD., AVINISSERY, RESIDING AT KUNHIKURU HOUSE, VENDOOR DESOM, AMBALLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY SHRI.SANTHOSH PODUVAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.245 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 4528 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of February, 2008 O R D E R In view of the submission of Shri.K.B.Mohandas, learned counsel for the review petitioner, that vakalatnama had actually been filed but was not noticed by the registry, I recall the judgment dated 13/02/2008. Post the writ petition on 06/03/2008. Panchayat will file counter affidavit, if any, before that date. 2. Considering the impleadment application i.e. I.A.No.100/2008 filed by (1) Shri.K.R.Rajeev, Convenor, Salkara Hotel Residency Virudha Powra Samithi, Avinissery P.O., Anakallu, Trichur – 13; (2) Shri.K.K.Gopi, Karuthedathu, Avinissery.P.O., Thrissur; (3) Shri. K.S.Babu, Karuthedathu, Avinissery.P.O., Thrissur; (4) P.J.Jomy, Perincherry Veedu, Avinissery.P.O., Thrissur; & (5) Shri.P.T.Rappai, Padikkala, Avinissery.P.O., Thrissur, the petitioners therein are impleaded as additional respondents 2 to 6 in the writ petition. Registry will carry out corrections in the cause title. The affidavit filed by Shri.K.K.Gopi in support of the impleadment application will be treated as counter affidavit for the additional respondents in the writ petition itself. R.P.No.245/2008 -2- 3. In the meanwhile, the petitioner in the writ petition is reminded that the constructions which he has already taken up will be at his risk and be subject to the out come of this writ petition. The review petition is allowed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) jg