IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2009 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 920 of 2009(B) ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07/02/2009 IN CRMP 5206/2008 IN CRA.31/2009 of SESSIONS COURT, KASARAGOD CMP.5206/2008 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, HOSDRUG .................... PETITIONER(S): APPLICANT/APPELLANT ------------------------------------------------- G.GANESHAN MASTER, AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'SREEMATHI NILAYAM', BEHIND K.T.C., HOSDURG TALUK, KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------------------- 1. C.LATHA, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O. CHANDRAN, RESIDING AT ANNAPOORNESWARI HOUSE, KIZHAKKE VALAPPIL, KOTTIKKULAM, UDUMA P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. RANJITH GANESHAN, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. G.GANESHAN MASTER, RESIDING AT 'SREEMATHI NILAYAM', BEHIND K.T.C., HOSDURG TALUK, KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. SANTHOSH KUMAR K.H., AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. KUNNUMMAL HARIDAS, RESIDING AT 'SREEMATHI NILAYAM', BEHIND K.T.C., HOSDURG TALUK, KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = CRL.M.C. NO. 920 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of March, 2009. O R D E R This petition is filed with a prayer to set aside the order of the Sessions Judge, Kasaragod in Crl.M.P.271/09 in Appeal No.31/09. The fight is between the father-in-law and the daughter-in-law and an order is given in favour of the daughter to reside in the house. The father-in-law would contend that the house exclusively belongs to him and therefore she has no right of residence. Now the matter is pending in appeal before the learned Sessions Judge. She had stated that there is nothing to interfere with the order and has refused to stay. Considering the contention between the parties I direct the learned Sessions Judge to consider the appeal itself as expeditiously as possible and dispose it of before the Court closes for summer holidays. The Crl.M.C. is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-