^"). '~a ^^^w^---" ,eR'ii''''1 '\0- 1 ."....'••••""- ^e& IN 1HE IdNiSBLE HIGH OOURT OE' CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS'UR Writ Petition No.A6/^ o£ 2006 Sadhuram Kosaria son of Magan Lal •>. Kosaria, aged about 49 years, 5-T S^H,0, palari, Distriat paipur (CG) PBTITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) The State o£ Chhattisga.rh Through- The Se'aretary, Department of Hcme and Police Affair D.KoS. Bhavan, Raipur (C«G«)'S ^^ ..-^'"^-- ^•"~^i-'^"\ ^\- ^ •'' (\uiv/\ i^sv'0*'* Chhattisgarh, -Polica Head Quarter, ^iv" „-<„„„,'r, ^'. -^,.*-'- ^w'~ 'j-"^ 2) The Direcfcor General of Polxce, Chhattisgarh, 'Polica Raipur (G.G'»)'. 3) The Dsputy Inspectpr General o£ Police (Adnn.) P.H»Q. Rai^>ur (C.G.;. WRIT PSTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP TI-IE CONSTIWUTION OP im IA te ^\ XI-HC-22 •Tsf -^WM^, ^TTl'y'.ito, I'l'ii'yy gn^i'^iT fi;-fi<* ant^l »H y^T fs^s-tz.o. .^ ^y <~ WTi'R'n'giflrrai sii^i'^RTOT'afer Shri Pifl.K snn sati; uupta; uy. Appiication for urgent h iseiTor yovi. Aavocate ror me State. Meara. l.ne petrtioner nas niee OnOR nasaod hv the D.S.G i TIS pemion agatnst me oraer aatea s-;;- !?f nriiirk& wh^i'^hv t'h& h^iifi<nn^E' has ho&n iransTsrred Trom fo'iice Learned counse! peiiiioner msiy ue yuecieQ E,O compete.nt authorities and if sMch Tepresentation is made, the same shait ho f^ntiiriaroi/8! anrl daptri'&ri Maving considered merits of the i;ase: in the witnout expressing any odiriion of this Court. ends of SSfv^d if 3 difSCtlOH J5 plv'l representauon raising nis gn r&snondelnts sJQnnw1th ©convl of -15 days imm today anc| comDetent a.uthoritv oftha ni@ni5 iu accorosnce wi?n \s penoa oftwo momns from the Counsel for ostt onsr reiisved, and he may be aiipw^d tt is made ciear that if aiiowep ?o coutiHus lui ?n©rop CoHsec|u^nt!y, M.VV.P.. disposea OT. Certified coov as oer. rul 4i|'4lfT)14l'1 ^-li^tnf'^'ft^ •<Fii<-?R ^art^sn^r to rolice tsange OT tiastar that for the Dresent. 15KS 5 fsDfeSSntStlOu D6TOFS tHS COi1C9m6CI on r;e wili ^n to ths pytitivner to maRs a dstaifyd ivances beiore the competent autnority of of ths DsttsQFi sind thsordsrwthin s &9r on sucn representation being fitea, shali decide the sa.me 6n its ine ^f 35 ear!y a5 possibfs.pfefersbiy withirf s |aate &rrecelpt ot.representation. submits' that tha Ddltionsr hss not bssn tocominue. , ithe p'etitioner has not besn relieved, he b© e&^niauui! |> U^^IUBU. >,tnis petitiQn stanas aisposea or,: No. 671/2006 and I.A. No. 2173/20(Bstand sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [1[T^1f^r