COCP No.1545 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1545 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 03.10.2011 Sadhu Ram and others .... Petitioner Versus Sh. G.S. Dhillon and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Anoop Singh, AA.G. Haryana. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners, in this contempt petition is that order dated 12.05.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No.16677 of 1992, has not been complied with. 2. Upon notice, reply has been filed, wherein it is stated that the aforesaid order dated 12.05.2010 has been duly complied with, as the pay of the petitioners has been fixed w.e.f 01.05.1990 and after fixation of their pay, arrears have also been released to them. 3. Para 2 of the preliminary submissions reads as under:- “That in compliance of the order dated 12.05.2010 of this Hon'ble High Court, the pay of the five petitioners has been fixed w.e.f. 1.5.1990 COCP No.1545 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: vide office order No.157 to 161 dated 9.12.2010. After refixation of pay of the petitioners, arrears has also been paid to them. The details of the balance arrears are as under:- Sr. No. Name Net Payment Mode of Payment 1 Sadu Ram 239807/- Paid vide Karnal Treasury pay order No.1300004679 dated 14.09.2011. 2 Swami Nath 370893/- -do- 3 Ram Lal 370893/- -do- 4 Jai Mala 84112/- Paid vide demand draft No.208048 dated 15.09.2011. 5 Kamlesh Rani 204492/- Paid vide demand draft No.208047 dated 15.09.2011 As such, orders of this Hon'ble High Court has been fully complied with”. 4. In view of the above, no further action is called for in the present contempt petition. Same stands disposed of. However,if there is any grievance subsisting, the petitioners shall be at liberty to take recourse to the legal remedies in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE October 03, 2011 sukhpreet