^^^- m THE HQN'SLE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITION (Si N0. 5 ^13 QF 2009 PBTITIONERS Suryapal Yadav son bf Shri Gopal Singh Yadav, aged about 47 years, Qccupation Service (U.D.T.) Pcvsted at Balak: Ashram Tetam, Tahsil; Katekalyan, District Dantewada •(C.G.),;, . ; ,•: ,-..1,.,^,,; R/o Shiv Manair, Ward No.3, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) 2^--Krishna Kumar Parnlar son bf Rain Singh Parmar, aged^ about 47 years, 'Dcciipation Service (U.D.T.), Posted. at 'Balals Ashrarn Burdi, Tahsil Sukma; District Dantewada (G.G.), R/o Village SE Pbst Hotkondal, Tahsil ' Bhanupratappur, Distriet KankerfC.G.) , ^ iGhatidra Prabha Yadav wife o£Shri Suryapal ;.Yadav, aged about 42 years, Qceupatlon- Service, posted at Balalc Ashrarn. Tetam, Tahsil Kafekalyaji, Districf Daritewada (C.G.) ;/;••:•:::.:. .:.;.•• :1'^ R/oShiv Mandir Ward .No.3, .Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) - , w: State of Chliattisgarh, ; throygfc: S'eeretary, Tribal : 'Welfare Departi'aent, Mantralaya, D.K.8. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.)., . •*h- ,K3 '(.'} The Commissiorier, Tribal Welfare and Developriierit, Raipur (C.G.). eolIectQr, District Collectorate, Dantewada, Disfritot Danewada (C.G.). \ :-' • '.'; The. Secretary, j Mata I?ukhmani Sewa Sartsfh.ari |Saraiti, Dimrapal, TaKsil;& Bistrict Jagdalp;ur:;(G.G.) ^ „ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 5613 of2009 PETITIONERS RE.SPONDENTS Suryapal Yadav & Others. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTrTUTION OF INDIA SBi Hon'ble Shri SatishK. Asmhotri. J. Present: Shri Amiya Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 to 3. .(ORAL) (Passed on 25ta day of September, 2009) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others^, thus the petitioners may be pennitted to make a representationto decide their case in the light ofaforestated decision, subject fo verification asto whelher the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Govemment Aided school and the petitioners areteacher withinthe sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance witfa law, within a period offour weeks fi-om the date of receipt offhe representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the A« petitioners, nothing survives inthis petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. .^Ljmt Sd/-: ,.,,:. SatishK.Nmho1" ^ Judge ' 2007 (l)BLJ 265