IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41675 of 2009 MANJU KUMARI, wife of Sunil Kumar Bhartiya, resident of Bhitta Bazar, PS Sursand, district Sitamarhi – petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG . ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocates. For the Vigilance : Mr. Arvind Kumar. … 2 6.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 4.11.2009 passed by the Special Judge Vigilance, Patna in Special Case No. 20 of 2007, arising out of Vigilance PS Case No. 39 of 2007. The main grievance of the petitioner is that she has not been supplied the police papers before framing of the charge which is against the provisions of section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court has rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that earlier also she had filed similar petition which was dismissed on 1.5.2009. The order sheet of the court below is clear inasmuch the court has said that after pursuing the court record it was found that the petitioner has received the case diary but has not received the copy of the pre-trap and post trap memo, verification report and the statement recorded under section 161 (3) of the Code. These documents have to be supplied to the accused petitioner in order to enable her to be aware of the materials which have come against her. 2 I accordingly direct that the aforesaid documents, that is, statement under section 161 (3) of the Code, the pre-trap and post trap memo and the verification report should be supplied to the petitioner. After supply of the documents, the petition for discharge ought to be considered by the court. Accordingly, the order impugned dated 4.11.2009 by which charges have been framed stands quashed. This application is, thus, allowed. Let a copy of this order be handed over to Mr. Arvind Kumar, Special P. P. for the Vigilance. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)