HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: Hon' ble Shri T.P. Sharma & Hon' ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ ^ Appellant/ Plaintiff First Appeal No. 95 of 2009 Saiyad Faisal Ali, S/o. late Shri Abrar Ali, aged about 32 years, r/o. Neharu Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). Vs. Respondents/ Defendants ~Y. '-f^ 1. Ku. Shreela Gosh aged about 47 years, D/o. Late Deenbandhu Gosh, R/o. Tikarapara Bilapur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). 2. Dilip Ranjan Gosh S/o. Late Deenbandhu Ghosh, aged about 54 years, R/o. Tikarapara, Shivaji Marg, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District B'laspur (CG). 3. Subhash Gosh, s/o. late Deenbandhu Gosh, aged about 58 years, R/o. in front of Maharashtra Mandal, Tikarapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). 4. Rajendra Kumar Agrawal @ Munna Agrawal, S/o. Shri Shankar Lal Agrawal, aged about 49 years, R/o. in front of Maharashtra Mandal, Tikarapara Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). 5. Rupesh Kumar Kosale, s/o. Jirjodhan Prasad Kosale, aged about 32 years, r/o. village Pendri, P.S. Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG). 6, State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Bilaspur (CG). (Appeal under Section 96 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure,1908). Present: '>. None forthe appellant. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.S/State. None f&r other respondents. Oral Order (Passedon 4-2-2010) i"'*'a;-£' :^... ^ /'./':'"i '&,-.-<-.!V. ''SSti'f »-^"?'^?. ^t . • .^ 'a. •:•, .../'' '•<s., Raju PerT.P.Sharma.J. Noneforthe appellant. Even in the second call also none appears for the appellant. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. ~—-——___ Sd/- 1 i Rangnath Chandrakar Sd/- I Judge T.P. Sharma Judge