IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1033 of 2008 (M/S) Gufran Ahmad. ……….. Petitioner. Versus Uttarakhand Parivahan Nigam & others. ………. Respondents Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment dated 6th June, 2008 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, M.A.C.T., Udham Singh Nagar. In para 7 of the impugned judgment, valid reasoning has been assigned as to why the operative part of the Award dated 21st April, 2008 cannot be reviewed, changed or altered. I see no reason to take a contrary view. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 25.06.2008 G