IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 847 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.13280/2009 Dated 05/08/2009 REVIEW PETITIONER: PETITIONER IN WP P.H.ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.P.M.HASSAN, PUTHIYA PARAMBIL, SEA VIEW WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN BIPIN B. RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WP 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA NORTH. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA NORTH. 5. THE R.D.O., ALAPPUZHA. 6. THE TAHASILDAR, AMBALAPUZHA. 7. THE TALUK SURVEYOUR, AMBALAPUZHA. 8. RAJA, S/O.ASHYA BEEVI, PUTHIYA PARAMBIL, SEA VIEW WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 9. SAVAD, S/O.RAJA, PUTHIYA PARAMBIL, SEA VIEW WARD, ALAPPUZHA. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. R. LAKSHMINARAYAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 847/09 IN W.P.(C) NO. 13280/2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009. O R D E R Raman, J. The writ petition was disposed of by our judgment dated 5th August, 2009 enabling the petitioner to measure his property without causing obstruction to the party respondents. In the last sentence of the order, it is stated that by virtue of the order, they shall not re-fix the boundary already in existence. In the review petition, it is contended that there is a civil dispute pending and according to the review petitioner, there is no boundary. We have specifically stated that the measurement is to be done without prejudice to the contention of either party and therefore, it goes without saying that the direction is that they shall not re-fix the boundary already in existence, if any, since we have not decided as to whether there is any boundary or not. Since there is already a civil suit pending, the respective rights of the parties will be decided in the said suit and our order will not prejudice the right of RP 847/09 2 either parties from raising such contentions in the proceedings. With the above clarification, the Review Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. KNC/-