HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO C.R.P.Nos.701 & 702 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: C.R.P.No.701 of 2011 is filed against the order passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Bobbili, in I.A.No.877 of 2010 in O.S.No.104 of 2007, dated 30-11-2010, whereas, C.R.P.No.702 of 2011 is filed against the order passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Bobbili in I.A.No.876 of 2010 in O.S.No.104 of 2007, dated 30-11-2010. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner- defendant. 3. Since the point to be considered is one and the same between the same parties, these two revisions are being disposed of by the following common order. 4. The learned trial Court eschewed the chief examination of P.W.1 on the ground that P.W.1 was not tendered for further cross- examination in spite of taking several opportunities. Subsequently, the above applications in I.A.Nos.877 and 876 of 2010 in O.S.No.104 of 2007 were filed before the learned trial Court to set aside the order and to recall P.W.1 for further cross-examination. The learned trial Court, by the impugned orders in both the I.As., recalled P.W.1 for continuation of cross-examination and set aside the order eschewing the chief examination of P.W.1 and accordingly allowed the petitions filed by the respondent-plaintiff. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that since there is no illegality in passing the earlier order, the trial Court becomes functus officio and has no power to set aside the order passed by it. 6. I see no force in the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner. In exercise of powers under Section 151 CPC, to meet the requirements of justice and for smooth functioning of the proceedings before the learned trial Court, the trial Court has jurisdiction to set aside the order passed by it and the impugned orders do not suffer from any legal infirmities or want of jurisdiction and therefore, the revisions are without any substance and merit. 7. In the result, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ 14th October 2011 KVR