HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M. C. C. No. 275 of2005 Applicants 1. Latel Ram Kewat, S/o Shri '- Karia, Village- Harhed, Post ‘ 1 2. Peeseed, Surta Ram, KaSdoi, SI o Shn' Raipur Ram (C.G.). Bhamse, Village- Koh'ha’ Post— Bagvuda, Baloda Bazar, Raipur (C.G.). 3‘ Rajnarain, S/o Ram Bhamse, Village Koliha, Post Bagvuda, t Balod Bazar, Raipur (OG‘). 4. Chiledi Lal, S/o Phil‘tu Ram, Villag€ Koliha, Post Bagvuda, Tehsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C. G,). 5. Cyanjk Sen, Village. and Post Palari, Distx‘ict— Raipur (C.G.). 6. Sewak Ram, S/ o Mast Ram, Village and Post Arjuni, Tshsil Balod Bazar, District- Raipur. Seeta Ram, S/o Ramad Pal, Village Chhuiha, Post Baloda Bazar, Distn‘ct- Raipur. 8. Agrahit, S/ o Pugau Sahu, Village axld Post Risda, Tchsil Baloda Bazar, District— Rajpur (C.G.). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Respondents S€cr€taxy, Public. Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Engineer in Chief, Pubiic Works Department, Raipur (C. G.). 3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.). Sub Divisional O$ce13 Public Works Department, Baloda Bazar/Vllaigarh, Raipur. Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihntri. 8111i S'unil Otwani, Advocate for the applicants. Shxi Pankaj Shn'vastava, Panel lawyer for the Respondents. w~ ‘ . / ORAL ORDER (16th January, 2006) go LO The following ord€r of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. This is an application for modification/review of the. order dated 15.9.2005 passed in W.P.No. 2048/2003 (Latel Ram Kewat &. others Vs, State of Chhattisgarh 8a others) along with other. wn't petitions, wherein this Court after having heaxd all , / the parties passed the. order to the following effect: " For the reasons stated above, the respondents are directed to allow all the gang men, who had retired on completion of 30 years of service but have not attained the age of 60 years, to rejoin the services and continue till they attain the age of 6O years, subject to depositing the retiral benefits, if any, given to them.” Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the order dated 15.9.2005 may be modified to the extent that the retiral benefits paid earlier be deducted from the salary of the employee concerned in installments. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said modification. Accordingly the order dated 15.9.2005 passed in W.P.No. 2048/2003 ( Latel Ram Kewat &. others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh 85 others) is modified to the extent indicated herein below:- “(4) For the reasons stated above, the respondents are directed to allow all the gang men, who had retired on completion of 30 years of service but have not attained the age of 60 years, to rejoin the services and continue. till they attain the age of 60' years,. subject to adjustment of the retiral i J“: ’1 / 4. benefits, if any, given to thein. The retiral benefits, if any, paid earUer be deducted froin the salary of the einployee concemed, ia instalhnents at fhe raaximuin rate of50% offhe salaxy." In view of fhe foregoiag the application stands atlowed. No order as to costs. Certified copy, as per Rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur