IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22554 of 2011(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ E.K.SHEEJA, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SPECIAL BUILDING SECTION-I, AYURVEDA COLLEGE SUB DIVISION, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRERSENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 3. R.MUTHUKUMAR, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, SPECIAL BUILDING SECTION-V, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. BY ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL SRI. K.A. JALEEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.22554/2011 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TRANSFERRING TO THE PETITIONER TO THE PRESENT OFFICE. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EB3- 9444/2011 DTD. 17/08/2011 TRANSFERRING THE PETITIONER TO SPECIAL BUILDING SECTION V, TRIVANDRUM. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 17/08/2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 17/08/2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.22554 of 2011-T. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Assistant Engineer in the Public Works Department presently working in Special Building Section I, Ayurveda College Sub Division, Thiruvananthapuram. This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P2 order. Ext.P2 would reveal that the petitioner is transferred from the aforesaid place and posted in Thiruvananthapuram District itself ie., in Special Building Section V, Thiruvananthapuram. May be the order of transfer is not in the interest of the petitioner and also may cause some inconveniences to the petitioner. However, that cannot be a reason for interfering with an order of transfer. There is only a vague allegation of malafide in this writ petition and such vague allegation also cannot form a ground for interference with a transfer WP(C).No.22554/2011-T. 2 order. In the said circumstance, Ext.P2 does not call for any interference and accordingly it is dismissed. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, (Judge) Kvs/-