U1GH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH Af BILASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS WMT PETITION (C) No. 2U87 ot 2007 ; 1. Oram Panchayat, Rmumujm^r, Janpad Panchayat - Ramanuj Nagar, Distt Surguja [C.0.1 Throu^i it's Sarpanch, Smt. Puniya Bai, W/o. Shri Salikram, aeed about 60 vears.Caste- Oond [S.T.1 R/o Ramanuj Nagar, Tah. Surajpur, Distt. Surguja [C.O] 2. Gram Panchayat, Bakinna, Jaiqwd Panchayat Prem Nagar, Distt. Surguja [C.G.] Throu^i- it's Sarpaneh, Smt. Panajo Bai W/o Shri Birang Sin^L aged about 25 years, Caste - Oond [S.T.] R/o Bakinna, Tah. Surajp.ir, Distt. Surguja [C.G.] VERSU8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarii, Throu^i - Secretary, Department af School Education, D.K.S. Mantralaya, Raipur [C.G.] 2. Mission Director, State Projeet Qfficer, Rajh? Gandhi Shiksha Mission, CUhattisgarh, Raja Talab, Raipur IC.G.1 3. Collector and District Mission Director, Ryiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission [Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan], Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja [C.O.] 4. District Panchayat, Surguja, Through- it's Chief Executive Officer, Ramanumagar, District Surguja [C.G.] 5. Janpad Panchayat, Ramanuj Nagar, Throu^i - its Chief Executive Officer, Ramanuj Nagar, District Surgyja [C.G.] 6. Janpad Panchayat, Prem Nagar, Tteoudi - it's Chief Exeeutive OtBcer, Prem Nagar, District Sureuia fC.G.1 WRTT PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTIQN QFJOS)IA 8B: H<m'ble Shri Satish K. AgniUiDfal. J. Itesent: Shri J.K.Shastri, Advoeate fw the petitioners. Shri A-S.Kachhwaha, Govenaneiit Advocate forlfae State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4 to 6. 0»UER (Passedon 17th d^of'SsptSinbsr, 2007) 1. In this petition the grievance oftfae petitionersis that &e respondeuts are not pemutting the petitioners to cany out the coasfructimi works of school buildina. 2. On 12.04.2007, this petition was directed to be listed dongwiih W.P. No. 7113 of 2006 and vide order dated 08.08.2007, thispetition was also directed to be listed alongwith W.P.(C) Nos. 4065 of 2007 aad 2949 of 2007. In those three eonnected petitions, notices were issued and despite serviee of notice, neither any representation is made aor anyone appears on behalfofrespwidents, except State. 3. Learaed counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 to 3 subnats that Ihe remainmg woric of the school building, if any, in the petitioners Panchayats may be completed by the ecmcemed Gram Pandiayat. 4. In view of the categorical statement made by the leamed counsel appearh^ fw Ifae respondent No. 1 to 3/State, leamed coimsel qipearing for tiiepetitioners subinits that nothing surviyes in the matter. 5. In view of the tbregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ThAm Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge