^ ^^y, IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTIS6ARH ATBILASPUR W.P. rs) N0. ^HV1 /2011 PETITIONERS '^ / ^ \^". ^X^'" y ^<w"'y'\ ?^yx .•'y ;.^< ..-•'s .-•$•" ^^ ,^ ,... ^')' y -^ ^~ ^ 1. Lakheshwar Prasad Sahu, S/o Late Shri Suddhu Ram Sofhu, aged about 62 years, Headmaster (middle school) at (Tribal Welfare Department) Middle Schoof Bhardu, &lock Khad9awa, Distt. -Korea (C.6.). 2. Righunath, S/o Late Khiru Ram, aged about 64 years, Retd. Headmaster (middle) at (Tribal Welfare Department) 6ovt. Middle School Khadgawa, Block - Khadgaon, Distt.- Korea (C.&.) ^ 3. Thakur Prasad Bishen, S/o Late Agar Sai, aged about 64 years, Retd. headmaster (middle) (Tribal Weifare bepartinent) Hr. Secondary School, Ba^ibahara Block Manendragarh, Distt. Korea (C.G.) 4. Sohan Lal Rai , S/o Late Shyam Lal Rai, aged about 59 years, Headmaster (middle) Govt. (Tribal Welfare bepartrhent) ^""\,€. ^^•»^%^ t^^'3^'"%, f"/11, -;^ n '; i ^lt ^ "^. ./.- ^^ ^ ^<:'!>^/^,sr-// •^y^^y RESPONDENTS Middle School Barbaspur, Block Manendragarh, Distt.-Korea (C.G.) 5. Ram Pratap $harma, S/o Late Ram Sunder Sharma, aged about 60 years, Lecturer 6ovt. (Tribal Welfare Department) High School, Pasauri, Block Manendragarh, bistt.- Korea (C.G.) VERSUS : l." State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare bepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur (C.O.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korea (Baikunthpur) Distt.-Korea (C.6.) 3. Block Education Officer, Khadgawa, Block-Khadgawa, Distt.-Korea (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Manendragarh, Block- Manendragarh, Distt.-Korea (C.G.) WRIT PETITEON UNbER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTCON OF INOIA 9 ^l' t,<;:•''^. HIOH COURT OP GHHATTI8GARHLAT BIJL^PUR SB : HPW*BLB SHRI JU8TICB PRITINKBR DIWAKBR PETITIONBRS W.P.tSI N0. 3844/2011 Lokeshwar Prasad Salxii & Ofhers Versws RBSPONDBNTS State ofC.G. &. Ofhers WRIT PBTITION VNDBR ART2CLE 326/227 Of THB COKSTITUtION Or iNmA AooeaiFaaace: Shri Anil Sisigh Rajput, counsel for the petitioners. ShriPmveen Das, Dy. G. A. for fhe State. ORAL ORDBR (18.07.2011) With fhe consent offhe parties, tl^e mattar is haard J&aaUy, The petitioners were initially appoiated as Assiataiit Teacjhiers in tiie year 1973 oii a fibced pay of Rs. 100, Afher completion of fheir probation period, they were granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Leamed coiiasel for tfae petitioners Bubmita that fhe above issue has been considered by fhe M»R State Admmiatrative Trfeunal^ Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madhukant Yadu aad 56 others Vs, State of M.R aad others^ wherem it was heM that the similarly situated teachers arc eiititled to regular pay scale with eflFect from the date ofinitial appomtaient. The matter was taken up to the Honyble Supreine Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon^te Supreme Court upholdiag fhe decisioaa of fhe Tribuaal to tfae effect fhat fhe Teachers/Assistant Teachers are enUfled to regular pay scale fix>m the date of iaitial appointment It is further submitted that fhis Court while considermg fhe same issue ia W.P. (S) JVb. 472S/2006 between Amar Scu Rcmz & Others W. State of Chhattisgarh cmd CHhers by order dated 01.09.06 allowed the petitioners to make a reprcsentation wifhiii a period of ten days, raising all tihe gritevaaces. ,, Accorduigly fhe petitioners are grajated libexty to make a repi^seHtation raising all fheif grievaaces ia fhe Mght oftiie afore^aid judgment axxd fhe circiilar dated 27.12.2008 (Amiexure P/4), mid m tani fhe concenied respondent is directed to decide the representation, if aay, in accordance wifh law, OB its own merite, withia a period of e^ht weeks from the date of receipt of tie representation subject to verificatiosi offhe facts, In view ofthe foregoiag, fhis petition is disposed of No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge