IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30443 of 2008 RAJNITI DUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 328 and 379 of I.P.C. The submission is that the petitioner is not one of the persons, who either hired the vehicle and sat in the vehicle and administered tea and biscuits to the informant. Those who have committed the act have been identified in T.I.P. It is further submitted that they sat at the house of the petitioner after they had taken the vehicle away. Learned counsel for the State points out that the investigation against the petitioner was still pending. The allegations are of having decamped with the vehicle of the informant. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, absence of allegations of involvement in the occurrence, identification of the players in the T.I.P., let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till - 2 - submission of charge-sheet upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand ) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Hilsa (Nalanda) in Islampur P.S. Case No.139/07 (G.R. No.1076/07), subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )