IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR <?.'. w.c.c. ^ MIS€7APPUCAT-IOM. No: /2005 !@ APPLICANT^c- VS^KV ^'^.^ ^ .•l\y ,<Spa •§?""'.A"^ ^••v'^ff' •1'.6cey A6y- RESPONDENT /Smt. Armindarjeet Kaur, W/o. Sukhdev Singh, Aged about 40 years, R/o.Gali No.3 Near Shiv Mandir, Fafadih, Raipur, TahsU 8s District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Sukhdev Singh, S/o. Late Indrajeet Singh, Aged about 43 years, R/o.Vidyut Nagar, Durg, TahsU & District Durg (C.G.) V-" APPLICATIQNLUZ&.MOF THE CODE dF CIVIL PROCEDURE XI-HC-22 an^r'qn '^iwsn^i ^H ^^f ~s i -^iwicPT, sTiiti'Ko, 1«f?n , c.c.^ 3II^T'FRITW^rf??T padm^i wii?pft;r •qm?if-^ fe^t-dSnsre i? arfiaiT an^r • 09/03/2006 Shri Kishore Bhaduri.Coufisel for the applicant. None for the non-applicanf. Husband/non-applicant h^sfiled an application under Section 13 of the hlindu Marriage Act for a de^ree ofdivorce in the Family Court, Durg. Wife/applicant has filed this ap^lication under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of the said case from Family Court, Durg to Family Court.Raipur, appreherfding un-called for event. She has also leveled various allegatiohs agai(ist her husband and all those allegations have been denied bythe husbai^d/non-appticant. Applicant in her apptica|tion has also narrated inconvenience to travel from Raipur to Durg aftending the Court which has not been negatived bythe non-applicant. Taking into consideratior) all the facts without going into the merit of the allegations, taking into| consideration the inconvenience of the applicant described in the ariplication and other circumstances of the case, the application is allowejJ, The Matrimonial CaseNo.436-A/2(X)5 pending before the Family Co^irt, Durg is transferred to principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur. In the light of above<j stands disposed of. rder,JANo.787/2p06 j^r urgent hearing Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge