IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27147 of 2008 1. MUNGRI YADAV S/O BATU YADAV 2. SITARAM SINGH S/O LATE NANDLAL SINGH 3. KAMLESH SINGH S/O SITARAM SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE- SANJHAULI, KARMA, P.S.- SANJHAULI, DISTRICT- ROHTAS ………….Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAJDEO SINGH S/O LATE MADHO SINGH R/O VILLAGE- KARMA, P.S.- SANJHAULI DISTRICT- ROHTAS …………..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 17.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 20.5.2008 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge-F.T.C.-4, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sessions Trial No. 34 of 2000, by which he has allowed an application of the prosecution for summoning the wife of the informant as a prosecution witness. I see no illegality in the order of the court below. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)