^3^TT^i«ic>5«,u>-al^<i<o, Rloi'<-iyt< wic5T mm^ -^(•K)-^Qt-^^--^ 200^ 31T^?T17^f> (yii^qcg) 3TT^$TcpTf^TT^ craT3n^$T^^H) ?^TT^R;?Tf^T3TT^5T PETITIONER: D.S.I aboul: Raip( Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. 3. 12-11-2008:- Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Heard. The petjtioner by thjs pet whereby the petitioner,//who i^ Department of Panph^yat and office of the Development Project implementation OfRcer The order of Annexure-P/1 was cbi^fo41Ti ^i+ioT^f^l<?l ^FJI^-CIK ^3Tf^T3TT^$T =>arganiha, S/o Shoba Ram Parganiha, Aged 49 years, R/o Qr. No.199, Sunder Nagar, r(CG) Stat^ of Chhattisgarh, through- Ifs Secretary, Pancjhayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Addi1|ional Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Pancpiayat & Rurai Development Department, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Shri |B.K. Harvansh, In-charge Supdt Engineer, OfRc^ of the Development Commissioner, Panc|iayat & Rural Development Department, Vika^ Bhawan, Raipur (CG) QA/rit Petition under Ai(ticie 226 of the Constitution of India) S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDftA MISHRA. J. for the petjtioner. 4awyerfor the Stete/respondents No.1 and 2. |tion has impugned the order dated 1-10-2008 working as Superintending Engineer in the ^urai Development, was transferred from the Cortimissioner Raipur to Dantewada as District |nder the Prime Minister Gram Sadak Yojna. ^ubsequently amended vide order dated 6-10- IF ..•f'''^^'-!^')>r-. .^s:"^ ^y ss^^ ^c^r ^ii^iirt^i, yTyi^^i<i, Rioi^i^ TPT^T^TTq? aTT^^TcpTf^TT^ ^T^n3TT^5T?CTt<p ^) Bar^e 3TT^?T q^P (ijc|i^c|<e|) ^200 ^F^TT^ ^rf^T 3H^^T ^ thfe 2008 and in piace of Dantewad^ same post. Learned counsel for the p|< than one year the petitioner ha^ further submitted that his sons a< transfer wouid adversely affect representation against his tran^l respondent No.1, who in turn ma\ specifsed period and tilt his contlnue at the present place of ^ Learned counse! for petitioner files representation same shall be considered and de|i weeks, In view of the submission; instant petitlon is disposed of for redressal of his grievances before respondent No.1. On su< be considered and decided by from the date of receipt of shal! not be relleved from the pre til! the disposal of the representat <M^fc^41Ti ^i^c^T^?{^£t1<Ri<<-ci^ ^3lf^T3TT^$T i, the petitioner was posted at Kanker on the stitioner submitted that within a period of less been transferred to 3 different offices. He fe studying at DPS, Bhiiai and his mid session their education. He prays for liberty to fiie fer order of Annexures-P/1 and Pf2 before be further directed to decide the same within repr|esentation is decided, he may be aliowed to is posting. State/respondents submitted that If the ag^inst the orders of Annexures-P/1 & P/2, the ^cided by respondent No.1 wlthin a period of 4 made by iearned counsel for the partles, the wit|i liberty to the petitioner to fsie representation ^gainst the orders of Annexures-P/1 and P/2 }h representation being made, the same shaiS ^espondent No.1 within a period of 4 weeks repr^sentatlon. in the meanwhiie, the petitioner ^sent piace of posting, if not aiready reiieved, on. Sdl- DhirendraMishra Judge