v^^^^^ ^^s:^''^ b*:y^-^ ^^••••;-^fp-^'^.l.^ •,<^^;''':......^--' ^ }^s^ .t-e°'-~ m THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fS) l3^'>/2010 PETITIONER 1 Nagendra Kumar S/o LateShri Bhusan Lal Ageabout 20 years,R/o Village AndPost-BhimKhanhar,Tahsil Dondi lohara ,District Durg (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS VERSUS • . •' • •'- ^ -,1. StateofChhattisgarhThrough . :. Commissioner. Lok Shikshan Sanchanalay D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) -2 ' District Education Officer District Durg(C.G.) , • Block Education OfGcer . Dondilohara,District-Durg 3; WRIT PETTTLON CNDER ARTICLE 22®iOF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA -n-A-r>aiu=iuT A nc< <->T'T'Tj[n_nE.'TTT'Tr>ivn?n t0 SiS-iS HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 1265 of2010 PETmONER : NagendraKumar. VERSUS RE8PONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OP INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Sattsh K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri B.K.Chakrabarty, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K-Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER .'tEut (Passed on 26m day ofMards, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner subiuits that by letter dated 30.05.2007 (Annexure P/5), Ifae petitioner was mformed that new posts of peon are likely to be vacant. Thereafter, the petitioner may make application for appointment on compassionate basis. Accordingly,* on 25.11.2009 (Annexure P/8) the petitioner made an application to Ihe respondent No. 2 for grant of compassionate appointment. He further submits that Ifae petitioner has given consent letter of all the concemed parties thereafter. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner suhniits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, prays for a direction to the authorities to consider and decide his application for grant of compassionate appointment in accordance with law. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits tfaat iffhe consent letter has already been filed aad the application/repr^entation ofthe petitioner, as aforestated, is pending consideration, tiie same shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, wifhin a period ofsix weeks fromthe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothmg survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed ofwith the above observation and direction. __——— 'l SatishK-Agnihotn 1 Judge lili.f