IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35895 of 2008 SANJAY KUMAR JHA @ SANJIV KUMAR JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.11.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a Police case under Sections 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that in a divorce case filed earlier in time by the petitioner pursuant to reconciliation efforts by the Court, the informant was taken back to the matrimonial home when differences became irreconcilable. With regard to the averment in Para 10 of the complaint the submission is that during pendency of the reconciliation matter when the occurrence is said to have taken place no complaint in this regard was made before the Family Court for which learned Counsel also relies upon the extract of the order sheet appended to the application. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Munger in Dharhara PS Case No. 56 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)