IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.7 of 2008 JAI GOVIND PRASAD SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 28.11.2008 KHAN The petitioner is the informant of Danapur P.S.Case No.390 of 2007. It is alleged that one Mukesh Sharma caught hold of his son and Rakesh and Dinesh shot at his head as a result of which he succumbed to the injuries in front of shop of Mukesh. Thereafter the informant’s wife and daughter reached at the place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the State has filed a counter affidavit wherein it has been stated that the independent witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. He further submits that merely naming the persons as an accused may not be enough for proceeding against them. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the view that if the petitioner files a representation before the A.S.P., Danapur raising all his grievances, he would himself supervise the case and would proceed in accordance with law and may get the statement of witnesses recorded in his presence. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)