IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19373 of 2009 LALLAN PANDIT @ LALLAN PARIT, son of late Punkal Parit, resident of village-Mirjapur, P.S.-Marhowrah, District-Saran------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present case is the product of skilled brain only as earlier complaint was filed just after coming of the complainant to her in-laws house, demand started in that case but for colour TV, Godrej Almirah and chain of gold while demand shown in this complaint petition is of a motor-cycle. Courts are required to take notice of such happenings for taking action against all but , in any case, no wife can be allowed to make imaginary allegations to see her husband and in- laws behind the bar. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Isuapur P.S. case no.12 of 2009 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J ) - 2 -