IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6899 of 2011 UMESH KUMAR SON OF SHRI SHAILENDRA PRASAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant is apprehensive in going to the petitioner’s house due to ill behavior of the petitioner. It is submitted that the interim maintenance order was passed on 27.01.2010, but still, the petitioner is not making the payment. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has challenged the order, by which he was directed to pay Rs. 2,000/- per month to the complainant. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 2,000/- per 2 month to the complainant from April, 2011, by second week of every month, by depositing the same in the account of the complainant. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No. 18/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted only when the petitioner will deposit the amount in the court and the default by the petitioner in any month, will give liberty to the learned court below to cancel the bail of the petitioner positively. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 3