Civil Revision No. 1135 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1135 of 2009 Date of decision: 20.03.2009. Nirmal Singh ....Petitioner Versus Pargat Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Yogesh Goyal,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The view obtained by the learned Trial Court in granting the ad-interim stay (and thereby restraining the impugned alienation) was affirmed by the learned Ist Appellate Court. The view ultimately emerging therefrom is that the grant of the restraint on alienation would prevent multiplicity of litigation. I find no reason to differ with the finding and also the reasoning noticed by both the Courts in support thereof. The petition shall stand dismissed. However, in the circumstances of the case, it is deemed just and appropriate to order that the learned Trial Court shall dispose of the suit itself within three months from the next date of hearing. Both the parties shall be granted two adjournments each (for the purpose of adducing evidence). If any party is inclined to summon any official witness, it shall be entitled to take dasti Civil Revision No. 1135 of 2009 -2- **** summons but the non return or non effecting of service thereof would not entitle that party to ask for any further adjournment. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. March 20, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge