IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2007 / 22ND PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 607 of 2007(V) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ JAYACHANDRAN S/O.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, DEPUTY TAHASILDAR (RR) KFC, KOLLAM, KEERTHANAM, KANJAVELI P.O., PRAKKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSINER OF LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 5. ARAVINDAKSHAN, THE VALUATION ASSISTANT, OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, KOLLAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J ------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 607 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as Special Deputy Tahsildar (RR) KFC, Kollam. In the light of Ext.P3 order passed by the second respondent, he apprehends transfer from the present station and replacement by respondent No.5. It is stated that Ext.P3 order has not been given effect to though passed in December 2006. On coming to know about Ext.P3, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 application before the third respondent not to pass any order transferring him from the present station. To the best knowledge of the petitioner, consequential orders pursuant to Ext.P3 have not been issued. 2. The limited prayer made by the petitioner is that the third respondent may consider the grievance of the petitioner highlighted in Ext.P4 and till orders are passed, he may not be disturbed from the present station while issuing orders pursuant to Ext.P3. 3. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 and dispose of the same within two weeks and till then not to pass orders causing dislocation to the petitioner on the W.P.(C)No.607/2007 2 ground that Ext.P3 has to be given effect to. The interim order is subject to the condition that orders pursuant to Ext.P3 has not already been passed. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the second respondent for information and compliance. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE css/ W.P.(C)No.607/2007 3