IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25158 of 2009 AMARJEET BHAGAT Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband and alleged for causing cruelty upon the complainant for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that all the allegations are false. The complainant had already deserted the petitioner from the month of June, 2003 and pressurizing to fulfill illegal demand which was reconciled and in a Lok Adalat, both the wife and husband appeared with their statement about remaining separated from each other from the month of June, 2003, after divorcing each other. While disposing of the anticipatory bail application, I refrain to make any comment on legalities of the divorce but separation is admitted to both the parties. So, ousting of the complainant six months earlier when the case has been filed on 06.01.2009, cannot be believed for refusal of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 31 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., 2 Gopalganj subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)