" pm; i‘i’i “m (ma km M13. I [133.1 wt 1m mi [ml ii"?! 1m [mix] m; Em.‘ M mm I'M Em hm; ii: h: x. g. if} L :— ai ma 5}K a . v.. { . ‘‘1 v2 I; Y 3' émgaima ETQI ;,. x EWWW W33 W WW 3 [/ a$%$i’ W3 {w-“e.kJam?) @i’m W ma 1 W anmi maw 1w»? a? W xM‘g’n % mi?" aJé‘a 20/2/2004 Shri Vishnu Koshta, counsel for the petitioners. Shn' Ranbir Singh, Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard. Shri Koshta submits that pursuant to audit objection, the petitioners’ two increments have been stopped and the recovery from their salary has bee ordered. They submitted the representations before the Co petent Authority, which have not / been decided. i i Having considered the f cts and circumstances of the case and material on record, in e opinion of this Court, ends of i justice will be served if a direction is given to the petitioners to i make the detailed representations alongw1th the copy of this petition before the compete it authority Within 15 days from today and on such represent tionsi being filed, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law .as earl as possible preferably within 2 \wi 3am. q Wimrla 1W. g ’ % WW (Eaf‘jém , mi w wtga» we“? N’ 2 ’_ Wikxmgggzi: <“T1W m‘¢vy3/O3%§2QG3 w» ”svwwm...‘ . months from the date of rece ipt of the representations. If any adverse orders are passed, Eh$eg§ieéms may avail the remedy available under the law. With the aforesaid observations, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.N 3.2833/2003 86 I.A.No.9 18 1/2003 also Stand disposed of. Certiiied copy as per rut s. 7 5d!- ' Fakhruddin ,1 f ‘ 1 i i Judge