IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 8TH MAY 2009 / 18TH VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12952 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SIVADASAN M.P., S/O. PADMANABHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, MANIKANDATHARAYIL, THONNALLOOR MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. MR.SAKIR.K.H. MR.BIJU GEORGE (ERNAKULAM) MR.K.R.PAUL RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. AJITH KUMAR, S/O. LATE RAVEENDRAN, AGED 30 YEARS, MANIKANDANTHARAYIL, THAONNALLOOR MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANDALAM POLICE STATION. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADOOR POLICE STATION. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. M.P.SREEKRISHNA SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 12952 of 2009(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2 WITH COPY TO R3. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. V.GIRI & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ========================== W.P.(C).No.12952 of 2009 - L =============================== Dated this the 8th day of May, 2009. J U D G M E N T Giri, J. The petitioner claiming to be a bachelor and residing in a residential house in Pandalam Village submits that there is threat to his life and property at the instance of the 1st respondent who is the son of his brother. 1st respondent submits that there cannot be any dispute as according to him the property belongs to him. It is further pointed out that the petitioner has filed a civil suit before the Vacation Court, Pathanamthitta and it is posted for return of notice. For these circumstances, especially where the petitioner and the respondent are relatives, we do not think it will be appropriate for this Court to entertain this writ petition nor issue any direction. Thus, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the civil court, the writ petition is closed. V.GIRI, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. bkn/-