IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36903 of 2008 RAM PRASAD RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Opp. Party : Mr. H.A. Khan, A.P.P. --------- 2. 30.9.2008 Heard. The Court is not on the merit of the allegations which could be the subject matter of enquiry during the full-fledged trial of the case. What the Court found is that the allegations are similarly made of acting in concert so as to getting a lady presented before the Registrar for registering a forged and fabricated deed of sale in respect of the homestead land of the complainant. The Court does not have any two opinions. The allegation may also be true, if it could not be false, merely for the reason that a man could not transfer his homestead land on which his house could be standing. But this could be a circumstance and not a final verdict of the alleged fact. The Court is astonished at the impugned order that the learned court below, while directing the release of some of the accused persons, who were similarly situated, refused the prayer for bail of this petitioner Ram Prasad Ram. The Court appears applying different yardsticks for two sets of accused persons facing similar allegation. In the above view of the matter, let petitioner, namely, Ram Prasad Ram be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with C.R. no.456 of 2002 (T.R. no.1441 of 2008). sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )