IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16247 of 2010 CHUNNU RAI S/O BAIJNATH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 25-06-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 149,323,307,379 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 18.01.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 38897 of 2009, the petitioner was directed to be released on bail on condition that an affidavit be filed on his behalf that he is not an accused in any other case, However, since the petitioner was an accused in one other case of similar nature such an affidavit could not be filed, therefore he was not released on bail. Thereafter the petitioner renewed his prayer for bail, which was rejected by an order dated 4.3.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 7246 of 2010, which stood rejected at that stage. It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 7-10-2009 and no injury report was placed on record. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Awtar nagar, P.S. case no. 40/2009 subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)