IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M-19399 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.8.2011 Pritam Chand ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Grewal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is 75 years of age and he walks with the help of a stick. He has been falsely implicated in the case only because his son has been involved. Even in the FIR, no injury has been attributed to him. In terms of the order passed by this Court on 29.6.2011, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. The factum of the petitioner being 75 years of age and his having joined investigation, is not disputed by the learned State counsel. Considering the fact that the petitioner is 75 years of age, in my opinion, his custodial interrogation is not required. Interim bail granted to the petitioner on 29.6.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 3.8.2011 Judge Meenu