IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.765 of 2001 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.02.2009 Surjit Singh Arora .............. Petitioner Vs. Jaspinder Singh Jakhar ............Respondent Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Palli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) It is represented by learned counsel for the respondent- landlord that the property has been delivered possession by the tenant. The civil revision petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE February 17, 2009 Pankaj*