1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION Show Cause Notice No. 191 of 1998 in Contempt Petition No. 82 of 2002 in Notice of Motion No. 233 of 2001 in SUIT NO. 212 of 2001 M/s. Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd . .. Petitioners vs. M/s. Mukud Dyers and ors. ... respondents Anil Rao for petitioners Rajendra Mittal respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: A. S. AGUIAR J. Date: 18/2/2005 P.C. Learned advocate for the petitioner states that the parties have settled the dispute. The respondents have filed affidavit tendering unconditional apology to this court. Affidavit taken on record. In view thereof the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Show cause notice stands discharged. 2 In view of the fact that the suit in which the order in respect of which the alleged contempt is committed has already been settled, the suit, as prayed for, allowed to be withdrawn and to stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Suit disposed of with no order with no order as to costs. Refund as per rules. (A. S. AGUIAR J.) -x- 3 To The Officer in Charge, A Ward, Licence Department, Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika, Mumbai. Sir, Sub: Issue of temporary licence. Since the construction of new building is in progress the tea stall run by me in the name of Cafe Regent has been shifted to the High Court compound, Annex Building, High Court, Bombay, for the purpose of convenience to carry out construction work. In the circumstances I shall be highly obliged if the Office of your Goodself be pleased to issue me a temporary licence to run the tea stall at the temporarily shifted place. I undertake to abide by all the terms and conditions. Yours faithfully, 21/2/2005 (V.B. M. Kadar), Cafe Regent, High Court Compound, Next to Annex Bldg., High Court Bombay, Mumbai.