IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5107 of 2010 Virendra Kumar, son of Sri Lavhman Mahto, resident of Village-Pratappur, Panchayat Balia, P.S. Amba, District- Aurangabad ----- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sri Kundan Kumar, District Collector, Aurangabad. 3. Sri Ram Niwas Pandey, Deputy Development Commissioner, Aurangabad. 4. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh, District Education Officer, Aurangabad. 5. Sri Omkar Singh, District Superintendent of Education, Aurangabad. 6. Sri Satyendra Prasad Singh, Block Development Officer, Kutumba, Aurangabad. 7. Sri Mahendra Nath, Block Education Extension Officer, Kutumba, Aurangabad. 8. Sri Rameshwar Singh, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Balia, P.S. Amba, Prakhand Kutumba, District- Aurangabad. 9. Sri Rajeshwar Singh, Chairman Education Committee, Balia, Aurangabad. 10. Ajay Kumar Mehta, Headmaster, Incharge, Utkramit Madhya Vidyalaya, Balia, Aurangabad. ---Contemners—Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 7. 17.10.2011 Heard Mr. Kamlendra Prasad Singh for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.10. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, has been filed by the petitioner of C.W.J.C. No. 13323 of 2006, and alleges non-implementation of the order dated 8.8.2006 (Annexure-1), whereby the writ 2 petition was disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 therein (District Collector, Aurangabad), to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 19.9.2006, within a period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The contemners have placed on record their show-cause. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the Bar that the matter is not pending before the then respondent no.2, and is instead pending before the learned District Education Appellate Tribunal, Aurangabad. This application is, therefore, disposed of with the hope that the learned Tribunal shall dispose of the appeal preferred by the present petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. This application is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)