-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.850 OF 2006 NO.850 OF 2006 NO.850 OF 2006 Shri Ashok Bansod ...Appellant v/s Mrs Sandhya Ashok Bansod ...Respondent Mr R.R. Salvi for Appellant. Mr H.S. Venegavkar for Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 27TH JULY 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. The appellant is the original petitioner who had applied for decree of divorce. Both the Courts below have found against him. The entire case turns on appreciation of evidence on record. I do not see any error committed by the Courts below. The learned counsel appearing for appellant submitted that the marriage has broken down irretrievably and therefore, the appellant is entitled to divorce. The marriage has broken down irretrievably is essentially a question of fact which cannot be decided in second appeal. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited.