IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 28113 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision: October 15, 2010. Sanjay ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Surender Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Goripuria, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.451 dated 27.11.2008, under Sections 148/149/302/307/120-B/216/416/420/467/468/471 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Sadar, Bahadurgarh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CRM No.M-28113 of 2009 It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 26.01.2009. Further contends that he was initially arrested for offence under Section 216 IPC and was admitted to bail and however, later on offence under Section 120-B IPC was added against him as well. Bail application has been vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the State. It has been contended that petitioner-accused connived with co-accused and a criminal conspiracy was hatched to commit murder of Karan Singh. Further contends that there are allegations that meetings were held on 23.11.2008 and 25.11.2008 for committing the said murder in which besides co-accused, the present petitioner was also present. Further contends that petitioner-accused, who was working at Rohini in Delhi Electricity Board scanned and prepared forged I.D. documents and then purchased sim cards Nos. 9999864616 and 9999086947 and supplied the same to main accused Mainpal @Dhela lodged in Central Jail, Bhondsi wherefrom accused –Mainpal @Dhela remained in constant touch with other co-accused. Further allegations are that petitioner-accused prepared and retained forged I.D. documents and purchased a sim card No. 9268689667 to use for himself. There are also allegations that after he was enlarged on bail, he again prepared forged documents and procured two sim cards no. 9811749454 and 9811749610 and handed over the same to co-accused Sandeep. During investigation computers, scanner, printer, CPU alongwith one Santro car bearing registration No. DL-8-CS-1955 and mobile phone were recovered from petitioner-accused and offences under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC were added against him. 2 CRM No.M-28113 of 2009 Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I am of the view that it is not such a case in which concession of bail should be granted to the accused. There is no merit in the instant application for bail filed by Sanjay. The same is, hereby, dismissed. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 15, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3