IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11858 of 2008. Decided on: 30.12.2010. Basu Dev. ……….Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Urban Development Authority and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, vice Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. C.N.Singh, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he had completed 10 years of continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year, but his case for conferment of work charge status has not been considered. Moreover, Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client was engaged before 31.12.1993. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents-State to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work charge status in view of law laid down by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supplement(2) SCC 316 and State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gehar Singh,(2007) 12 SCC 43 within a period of two months after 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (krt) 2