1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.223 OF 2006 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 943 PETITION NO. 943 PETITION NO. 943 OF OF OF 2003 2003 2003 Mr. Yog Raj ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Shailesh Shah with Mr. Jaideep Mitra and Mr. O.P. Singh for the Petitioner Mr. Vijay Kantharia with Mr. S.D. Bhosale for Respondents CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 7TH JUNE,2006 P.C. . Considering the affidavit of Commander Damodaran Pillai Ananth Kumar more specifically the averments in paragraph 8, we do not think any case has been made out by the petitioner for granting the relief as prayed for. It has clearly been set out that the case of the petitioner was considered. However, considering his record and also the sanctioned strength of the past it is not possible to re-engage the petitioner. Considering the above, no case is made out for grant of relief. Motion 2 rejected. . Needless to say that these observations are considering the case of the petitioner for being re-engaged. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).