IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-31264 of 2008 Date of decision : 1.12.2008 Jan Mohd. and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners S. D. ANAND, J. Learned Additional Sessions Judge noticed that the petitioners were not entitled to grant of anticipatory bail as they did not join investigation inspite of the order to that effect which (order) came to be passed while granting them interim bail by that Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to argue that the above factual premise is not correct. By the very natures of things, the grant of interim protection is ordered by this Court in exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction which this Court would not be inclined to do in the case of an applicant who does not comply with an order passed by the Court of Sessions. It is apparent from the impugned order that certain co-accused were indeed granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail because they joined investigation in terms of the order passed by that Court. It is, even otherwise, apparent from the impugned order that one of the co-accused is evading the law and had been declared as proclaimed offender. In the light of the fore-going discussion, I do not found it to be a fit case where the anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners. Dismissed in limine. December 01, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE