: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.13 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.13 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.13 OF 2007 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.274 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.274 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.274 OF 2006 IN IN IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.123 OF 2003 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.123 OF 2003 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.123 OF 2003 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2482 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.2482 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.2482 OF 2002 Julius Gresto .. Petitioner. Versus Gerald D’Mello .. Respondent. Mr.Dipesh U.Siroja i/b.L.J.Law for petitioner. Mrs.Nita Mandhyan i/b.Vasant Dhawan for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22nd October, 2007. DATE : 22nd October, 2007. DATE : 22nd October, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This Contempt Petition was disposed of by me on 19th September, 2007. However, inadvertently, there remained mention of the name of Advocate for respondent. As requested, the order passed on 19th September, 2007 is : 2 : corrected and the mention of the name of Advocate "Mrs.Nita Mandhyan i/b. Vasant Dhawan for Respondent" be added and mention of "Mr.Gerald D’Mellow for respondent" be corrected as "Mr.Gerald D’Mello-respondent present in person". The order shall be read accordingly. No other modifications or corrections are made. Rest of the order remains the same. 2. Application for Speaking to the Minutes is disposed of accordingly. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)