IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 43177-M of 2001 Date of decision: 10th July, 2008 Surinder Singh … Petitioner Versus Dilbagh Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Lalit Goyal, Advocate for Mr. B.S.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Assistant Advocate General Haryana for the State. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner has read para 7 and 8 of the impugned order, which is reproduced below: “7. As the dispute in the present case has been arisen because of the dispute of the possession of the parties over the suit land and as referred to above, an order of status-quo in all respects including possession had already been granted by the civil Court, so it would be appropriate for both the parties to approach the concerned civil Court and to get a clarification of the order by clearly getting direction as which of the parties according to the Court is said to be prima facie in possession of the suit land. 8. Resultantly, as a consequence to the aforesaid discussion, the present revision petition containing merit is hereby accepted and the impugned order dated 22.5.2001 is hereby ordered to be set aside. The lower Court record along with a copy of this judgment be sent to the Court of learned SDM, Sonepat for information and compliance. Revision file be consigned.” CRM No. 43177-M of 2001 Counsel for the petitioner further contend that parties to proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. are co-sharers. In case of co- sharers, whether proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. can be initiated or not, is another question which has not been raised before the authorities below. I find no infirmity in the impugned order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat (Annexure P-2). Counsel further contend that there is apprehension of breach of peace. Needless to say, proceedings under Section 107 and 151 Cr.P.C. is another remedy available to the parties. With these observations, I find no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 10, 2008 rps 2