@ WGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ W m7 r DIViSiON BENCH Coram : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHR! DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J. 1%!” Writ Petition No.24410f 2006 ‘PETiTiONER Mahamaya Swayatta Sahakari Samiti Prathmik Upbhokta Bhandar Maryadit, Ameri — a cooperative society registered under v-the provisions of the M.P.(C.G.) Co- operative Societies Act, 1960 vide registration NoDRG/28/2004 through Anii Chandrakar, aged about 37 years S/o Shri J.S. Chandrakar, Ric Jamgaon (M),_ Tehsii Pater), District Durg (Chhatiisgarh) 2. Dura Jiia Thok Upbhokta Sahakari BhaEdar, (Burg District Wheiesaie Consumers Cooperative Stores) $adar Bazar, Durg — a Cooperative Society registered under the provisions of the MP. {C.G.) Cooperative Societies Aot,1960 vide registration No.608 through Rajendra Tamrakar, Aged about 46 years, S/o Shri H.L. Tamrakar, R/o Sadar Bazar, Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4 3. Bhiiai Thok Upbhokta Sahakari Bhandar Maryadit Bhiiai — a cooperative society registered under the provisions of the MP. (C;G.) Cooperative Societies Act,1960 vide registration No.32, through incharge Officer R.P. Tiwari, Aged about 47 years, S/o Shri C.S.Tiwari, R/o Bhiiai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supplies and Consumer RES?ONDENTS @@ Prefection, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipw (Chhattisgarh). 2; The Coifector, (Chhattisgarh) 3. Sub Divisionai Officer (Revenue), Disirict Kariya (Chhattisgarh) District Durg Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of mdia Present: Ms. Bharati Soni, ieameci counsei on behaif of Shri Jitendra Pali, ieamed counsei fer the petitianers. Shri Yas‘nwant Singh Thakur; learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. ORDER (Th March, 2008) The foliowing order of the Couxt was passed by Rajeev Gupta, G.J. Shri Yashwant Singh‘Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate ‘ Genera! submits that as ali the‘issues raised in this writ petition have already been finally decided vide order dated 09-03-2007; passed in WP. No. 5265/2006 and other connected petitions; now nothing survives for decision in this writ petition. 2. Ms. Bharati Soni: learned/counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the above factual situation now prevailing in the matter. 3. The writ petition; therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently: the interim order dated 09-05-2006, stands 4 vacated automaticaiiy. ‘ Sow Dhirendra Mishra i Chief Justice Judge iic