IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. SUMMARY SUIT NO. 254 OF 2006 Ram Puri, Proprietor ... Plaintiff. of M/s.R.S.Industrial Products. Versus. Power Max(India)Pvt.Ltd. ... Defendents. Defendents. Defendents. Mr. Vinod L. Sharma for the plaintiff. Mr. Kiran Gandhi i/b. Little & Co. for the defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE DATE DATE : 21st June, 2006. : 21st June, 2006. : 21st June, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The consent terms signed by parties and their Advocates are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 2. This Summary Suit has been settled inas- much as defendants have admitted the claim of the plaintiff to the extent of Rs. 3,37,603/-. If this sum is paid, in the manner set out in the consent terms, the same shall be treated in full satisfaction of the claim in the suit. 3. However, upon default, it is provided that the Summary Suit stands decreed and then the plaintiff would be entitled to recover the amount as prayed by him in the suit by executing the decree in accordance with law. If the amount is paid, then the same would be treated as complete satisfaction of the claims in the suit. 4. Order in terms of consent terms. - 2 2 2 - 5. Refund of court fees as per rules. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J)J)J)