HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.5430 of 2009 (O&M) Date Of Decision: 18.09.2009 **** B.R. Gupta . . . . Petitioner VS. M/s. Kohinoor Collections etc. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) The petitioner-landlord seeks a direction to the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, to expedite the disposal of the eviction petition filed by him against the respondent-tenants. It is alleged that the respondents are dilly-dallying the proceedings. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any view on the merits of the case or the averments made against the respondent-tenants but keeping in view the fact that like any other litigant, the petitioner is also entitled to speedy disposal of his petition, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Rent Controller, UT Chandigarh, to make an endeavour to decide the eviction petition as early as possible and preferably within a period of one year by ensuring that only reasonable opportunities are granted to the parties to lead their respective evidence. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 18.09.2009 shonkar