1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.407 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.324 OF 2004 IN SECUNDERABAD O.S SUIT NO. 61 OF 1999 M/s. Sripathi Pharmaceuticals Limited ...Plaintiffs Vs. M/s. Apte Amalgamations Limited ...Defendants ----- None for Plaintiffs Mr.Amit Survase i/b. Shaunak Satpute & Co. for Defendants. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 2ND MARCH, 2010 P.C. 1. None appears on behalf of the Plaintiffs. 2. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendants submits that the parties have settled their dispute. He invited my attention to a letter written by the Defendants to the Plaintiffs. In the said letter, it was pointed out that the suit would appear under the caption of dismissal. 3. In spite of service of the plaint, none appears on behalf of the Plaintiffs. Further, the letter was addressed by the advocate for the Plaintiffs, in which 2 he has also confirmed that the matter was settled out of the Court. It appears that the Plaintiffs are not keen in pursuing the suit. Since the matter is settled out of the Court, suit is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Since suit itself is disposed of, Chamber Summons also does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly. (V.M. KANADE J.)