IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 37957 of 2007(R) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------- 1. BIJI.K., AGED 33, W/O.JOSHY, R/AT ISWARYA, PAMPURAM DESAM, KALLUVATHUKKAL PANCHAYAT, PARIPPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. ISWARYA, AGED 11, D/O. K.JOSHY, MINOR REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER IST PETITIONER. 3. GIRIJA, AGED 4, D/O. K.JOSHY, MINOR REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER IST PETITIONER. BY ADV. SMT.T.S.MAYA (THIYADIL) SMT.K.REENA RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARIPPALLY POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. 2. K.JOSHY, AGED 37, S/O.KAMALANANDAN, PULIMMOOTTIL MELETHIL VEETTIL, ELAKAMAN P.O., VARKKALA, NOW RESIDING AT ISWARYA, PAMPURAM DESAM, KALLUVATHULLAL PANCHAYAT, PARIPPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.A.SALIM ADV. SRI.S.D.ASOKAN --R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 37957/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE EXTRACT FROM THE DOCTOR'S PRESRIPTION. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE OP NO. 811/2007 OF FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY DR. KRISHNA PRASAD SREEDHAR DT. 13/12/2007. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1 DY. 10/12/2007. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1 DT. 13/12/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ======================== W.P(C).No.37957 of 2007 ======================== Dated this the 16th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The first petitioner is the wife of the second respondent. Petitioners 2 and 3 are their children. The petitioners have approached this Court alleging that the second respondent is physically harassing them. Though complaints against the second respondent were filed before the police, no action was taken. Hence, this writ petition seeking the following relief: "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ directing the 1st respondent to take necessary actions against Exts.P4 and P5 complaints and to render adequate and meaningful protection to the life of the petitioners to live at their house peacefully." 2. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that it is a family dispute and allegations and counter allegations are made by both sides and the dispute between them WP(C) 37957/07 -: 2 :- are pending before the competent court. 3. The second respondent filed a counter affidavit raising very serious allegations against the first petitioner. The learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that the second respondent has no intention whatsoever to harass or harm the petitioners. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. K.Balakrishnan Nair, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 17/1