1 1825.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1825 OF 2011 Ankush Bapuso Babar & Anr. ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Machindra Patil for Petitioner. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondents. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 23, 2011. P.C. 1. The grievance in this Petition is that although the tenure of the existing Office bearers of respondent No.5 has expired as back as in the year 2001, they are still continuing in the Office and are discharging all functions and duties of the Office bearers unauthorisedly. According to the petitioner, the respondent No.3 inspite of repeated representations, has not taken any steps to constitute new Committee, much less, to appoint Administrator, as the tenure of the earlier Committee has already expired in the year 2001. 2 1825.11 2. We dispose of this Petition with direction to respondent No.3 to consider the present Petition as final representation of the petitioner and take appropriate measures as may be advised in accordance with law. 3. The respondent No.3 shall give opportunity to the petitioner in the proposed proceedings to be initiated against the Office bearers of the respondent No.5 Society. The respondent No.3 shall consider the final representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably on or before 21st April, 2011 and report compliance to this Court within the same time. 4. We make it clear that all reliefs claimed in this petition will be considered by respondent No.3 and the other reliefs claimed by the petitioners will be considered by respondent No.4 depending on the outcome of the decision of the respondent No.3. All questions are left open, to be decided by the concerned Authorities on its own merits in accordance with law. 5. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)