HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1054 of 2009 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have deliberately flouted the judgment rendered by this Court in Second Appeal No. 647 of 2003, dated 19.7.2005. This Court ordered notice to all the respondents. Subsequently, the contempt case was dismissed against respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Notice upon respondent No.1 could not be served on account of the fact that she is said to have migrated to Hyderabad. The petitioner is yet to secure her correct address. The contempt case cannot continue. If the petitioner is so advised, he can file a fresh contempt case against the 1st respondent duly furnishing the correct address. Hence, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a fresh contempt case against the 1st respondent with correct address. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY,J DATE: 29th December, 2010 pnb