[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.428 OF 2004 Sou.Pragati Prashant Pathak ..Applicant/ Appellant Vs. Prasant Ramchandra Pathak and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Vilas Tapkir advocate for applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MAY 03, 2007 DATE : MAY 03, 2007 DATE : MAY 03, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant-original complainant has preferred this revision application against the acquittal of respondent nos.1 to 3. The applicant is the wife of respondent no.1. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant-original complainant states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties in the [-2-] proceedings before the Family Court at Pune and in view of the settlement, she does not wish to proceed against the respondent nos.1 to 3. It is further stated that she seeks permission to withdraw the present revision application. She has also filed affidavit to that effect which is taken on record. In view of the said affidavit, this revision application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]