IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22107 of 2008 Between: M.S.Palanivel, Proprietor, M/s M.S.P. Granites, TEKKALI, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Srikakulam District, SRIKAKULAM. 2 Chief Engineer, North Coast, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3 Superintending Engineer (I & CAD), B.R.R. Vamsadhara Project Circle, SRIKAKULAM, Srikakulam District. 4 Executive Engineer, I.D., B.R.R. Vamsadhara Project, M.C. Division, TEKKALI, Srikakulam district. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Letter No.SSE/SKLM/DB/AT02/ LMC/1288 (a) M dated 2-10-2008 and the consequential letter No.503 M/EE/MCD/TKI/AB/EXB dated 2-10-2008 of the 4th respondent as illegal and void and consequently permit the petitioner to continue the construction of S.L.Pipe culvert KM.64.445 on Left Main Canal of B.R.R Vamsadhara Project Main Canal. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22107 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated 23.12.2008 to the Registry stating that he has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 26th December, 2008 IBL