CWP No.3253 of 1989 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3253 of 1989 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.11.2011 Balbir Singh, Workshop Instructor, J.R. Government Polytechnic, Hoshiarpur, and others. ... Petitioners. Versus The State of Punjab, through the Secretary, Technical Education, Civil Secretariat, Punjab, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:Mr. S. Sodhi, Advocate for Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1. None for the others. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) CM No.14014 of 2011 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the case is restored to its original number. CWP No.3253 of 1989 2. The issue involved in this case has been dealt with by this Court in yet another case titled “Tarsem Chand v. State of Punjab and others” in CWP No.10366 of 1989 decided on CWP No.3253 of 1989 (O&M) [2] 19.09.2011. The petitioners' case would require to be found favourably for the same reason. I am not, therefore, reproducing the reasoning of this Court. I would hold that the petitioners are entitled to relief as sought for and denial of promotion to the petitioners was not justified and they were entitled to be considered as promoted on the date when their juniors were promoted. The petitioners will be entitled to all consequential benefits and the same be worked out and be released to the petitioners within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4. The writ petition is allowed. NOVEMBER 18, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE