IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7132 of 2010 JANKI YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 08/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner is that he is not named in the F.I.R. which is against unknown. The allegations under the Indian Penal Code are bailable. Learned counsel for the State points out that the allegations are of blowing up the school building under the Explosive Substances Act. The impugned order of rejection notices that the petitioner has antecedents of six cases of heinous nature. Considering the facts and circumstances let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No.124 of 2009. Both the sureties must be permanent residents of his village having lands in their own names. The Photograph and proof of residence of the 2 bailors shall be appended to the bail-bonds which shall be verified by the court below through the local police before finally accepting the same. If the petitioner fails to be appropriately represented on even a single date or refuses to appear despite the directions of the court below on a specified date, that shall be sufficient for the court below not only to deal with him appropriately, but also the sureties if the circumstances so warrant so that the progress of the trial is not hindered. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)