1 CONP14.08.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 14 OF 2008 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1018 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 878 OF 2006 Mysore Sugandhi Dhoop Factory Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioners. V/s. Satish Shashikant Mehta. ... Respondent. Mr. V.R. Dhond, Darshan Mehta i/b. M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the Petitioners. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 29th OCTOBER 2010. P.C. :- By this Contempt Petition the Petitioners alleged that certain goods came to be dispatched out of India on the basis of invoices and product packages. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners could not point out invoices annexed to the plaint. If the invoices which form the allegations of contempt are not annexed to the Petition, it will not be possible for the Court to judge the case of the Petitioner in the light in which the oral arguments are made. In the absence of appropriate documents, the Contempt Petition cannot be admitted. The Contempt Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission with no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)