IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.2210 of 2007 APPLICATION No.2210 of 2007 APPLICATION No.2210 of 2007 Vijay Bhau Nagaonkar & Ors ..Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr B. W. Kakde, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr Y. S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 10TH JULY, 2007. 10TH JULY, 2007. 10TH JULY, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for the State. 2. Perused application. 3. The applicants are charged for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 506 (II) read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and read with Section 37 (a) of the Bombay Police Act. The order passed by the Principal Judge of Sessions Court, Greater Bombay dated 2.7.2007 whereby the application for anticipatory bail came to be rejected. It appears that the weapons like chopper and stick have been used in commission of the offence. Some of the accused persons are absconding and the investigation is still in progress. The applicants will be required to interrogate with respect to commission of the offence and in that view of the matter learned APP submits that custodial interrogation would be necessary. There is ample material available on record to connect the applicants with the alleged commission of the offence. This is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The application is therefore rejected. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)