IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41249 of 2008 ANSARUL HAQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 4.12.2008 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. Pd. Yadav, learned A.P.P. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He was married to her four to five years prior to the incident. The allegation is that the deceased was taken by the petitioner after bidai and just half a hour after on 9.6.2006, the informant could not find his sister in the house of the petitioner. Subsequently, a dead body was found floating in the water and that was brought out and it was found that it was found in a sack which was filled with bricks. The post mortem examination report supports that bricks were tied to the dead body around its trunk with help of the sari. The contention is that the deceased had married the petitioner out of love for him and it was never an arrange marriage. It is contended that it could be the informant who was against the marriage of his sister to the petitioner and, as such, he came to the house of the petitioner and took her sister and killed her in way and filed a wrong report. This Court does not see any reason to discard the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the facts and circumstances that the lady was married four to five years prior to the occurrence. The strongest circumstance is the manner of disposing of the dead body. The deadbody was put in a sack in - 2 - which bricks were put, and considering that I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )