IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3369 of 2010 PRAMOD PANDIT @ BUTTA, S/o Bachu Pandit. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 366A/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the victim in his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. did not allege any sexual assault and now the matter has been compromised between the parties, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 244 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will - 2 - receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate will immediately commit the case for trial and the trial court in seisin of the case will conclude the trial within a reasonable time in view of the fact that the parties have compromised between themselves. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)