$§E§m§z w Q5 Km;&E ra W 16a INETHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAWISGARH AT BILASPUR i Writpetitiomsmo. i39/L17/ /2oo9 x /D.R. Gajéndra S/o Late Shri Vikram Virendra Aged about 49 years; Océupation Assistant Block Education Offlcer, Balod R/o Balod Civil Line Balod, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT /1) State of Chhattisgarh through ’ The Secretary SChool Education D.K.S. Bhawan Department Raipur (C.G.) r 2) The Under Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Rajpur (C.G.) ,3) The District Education Officer, Durg District Durg (C.G.) 9/ ‘ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226’OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER W ”9&93741 $2009 f Mm£mm~ ' » - *aw‘fémm : an. ir. 23.0?.2%Q: Shri B.P. Singh, counsei fibr the petitioner. $hri Yashwant Singh Thakur Dy. AG for the respondents/State. At the ou? set counsel §or the petiiioner submits that he wanés ta withdraw this petition with ttbetty make a representattcn to respon’demt Ne2 raising ali his grievance against the order dated 36.6.2009. He eieo seeks a direction to the concernee authority for deciding the representation of the petitioner at an eariy atate. To this request of the counsei for the petitioner, State co A nsei has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is ismissed as Withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. if the petittoner mek a representation to the concerned respondent Withtn a period of ten ays'from tne date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected tie be decided within a further period of 1! three weeks it is made from clear the date that of this its CoLrt reeeipt has not commented on the merits of the case and the authorities ‘concemed are free to decide the representation or the petitioner striptly in accordanoe with iaw. l/‘ o Sd/— Pritink‘er‘ 3iwaker ‘ Judge meaxe-www. Ht .. o m re. ,, _ V ~ err xmeem.»e.«am.wwwtw