IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3801 OF 2006 Ashok Vishnu Waghmare ... Petitioner Versus Special Inspector General of Police and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. P.M. Pradhan for the petitioner. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag. C.J., & V.M. KANADE, J. DATE: JULY 19 , 2006 . P.C. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal rejecting the original application filed by the petitioner for quashing the order of suspension issued by the State. 2. We have gone through the impugned order and the submissions made by Shri Pradhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The order of the Tribunal has taken note of the entire law on the point as was placed before it and has found that the Rules provide for periodical review of suspension orders by the State. An affidavit in reply is filed saying that such periodical review is undertaken by the State regularly. In such circumstances, we do not see any jurisdictional legal error committed by the Tribunal in rejecting the original application. Petition is dismissed.