1 caf752-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL APPLICATION NO.752 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.804 OF 2010 Sou.Vimal Harischand Rathod .. Applicant V/s. Prashant Shriniwas Chopde & Ors. .. Respondents ..... Mr. Ajay A. Joshi for the applicant. Mr. P. K. Hushing for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 15, 2011. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the first and second respondents. In Civil Application No.2988 of 2010 in First Appeal No.1082 of 2010, the execution of the impugned decree has been already stayed. So long as the execution is stayed under the said order, it is not necessary to grant relief in terms of prayer clause (A). Liberty to the applicant to apply in future if occasion arises. 2. Execution of the decree of specific performance passed in favour of the first and second respondents has been stayed and, therefore, sale 2 caf752-11 deed in terms of decree cannot be executed in favour of first and second respondents. Therefore the first and second respondents have not acquired any title. Therefore, there is no reason to grant injunction in terms of prayer clause (B). The said prayer (B) is rejected. Application is disposed of on above terms. 3. First Appeal No. 804 of 2010 shall be heard alongwith First Appeal Nos. 817 of 2010 as well as 1282 of 2010. JUDGE