1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2066 OF 2009 Union of India ..Petitioner Versus Moideen Mohmmed Muthalib ..Respondent. Mr.R.V. Desai with Mr.R.B. Pardeshi for the petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 4TH NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned senior Advocate for the petitioner. Perused petition. This petition is directed against the order dated 28-11-2008 (Exhibit “D”) passed by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), whereby the goods confiscated were ordered to be released on payment of redemption fine and on payment of personal penalty imposed for the reasons stated therein. 2. Having gone through the order and the reasons given, we do not find any perversity in exercise of discretion. This Court not being a fact finding Court is not expected to re-appreciate the evidence once again. The view taken by the authority below is a reasonable and possible view. 3. The petition is without any merit. The same is, thus, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)