IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH OCTOBER 2006 / 13TH ASWINA 1928 FAO.No. 230 of 2006() --------------------- AS.162/2000 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, N. PARAVUR OS.225/1995 of MUNSIFF COURT, N. PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT --------------------------------------------------------- K.P.SATHYANADAN @ BABY, MADATHIKKATTU VEETTIL, PARAVUR VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VENUGOPALAN RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ------------------------------------------------------ ROSILY, D/O. GEORGE, KALATHIL HOUSE, MANJALI KARA, AYNOOR VILLAGE, PARUR TALUK. THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS ALONG WITH F.AO.231/2006 HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/10/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = F.A.O.Nos.230 and 231 of 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of October, 2006. JUDGMENT The short issue that arises for decision in these appeals is as to whether an issue could have been entertained by the appellate court after the dismissal of the review petition by the Court of first instance. The dismissal of a review petition would not affect the appeal from the original order/decree/judgment. Under such circumstances, these appeals are without merit. They are accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/-