IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19359 of 2010 NAGENDRA RAI, Son of Deena Rai Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 03.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 147, 341, 323, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. In paragraph 7 of the case diary, it has been stated that the death of the deceased has been caused due to chest injury. It is unfortunate that such statement has been made in paragraph 7, as the opinion of the doctor clearly shows that the deceased died due to head and chest injury. Learned counsel further submits that the villagers have filed a petition that son of the informant on account of mental abnormality has levelled the allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report as an assailant, who struck the head of the deceased with lathi and thereafter mounted his chest and pressed his neck. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)