IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.781 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: JULY 5, 2011 Sham Lal .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Senior DAG, Haryana for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Though reply has not been filed, but Mr. Nehra has placed before me an order dated 22.6.2011 showing that the benefits claimed in the writ petition have been granted to the petitioner. Copy of the communication is handed over in the Court today along with the translated copy thereof. The same is kept on record. Since the relief claimed in the writ petition has been granted, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. If the petitioner is still left with any grievance or if any benefit is not released to him, he would be at liberty to revive the petition. Disposed of as having become infructuous. July 05, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE