IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12814 of 2009 MASUD ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.07.2009 A supplementary affidavit has been filed lon behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on the record. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offences punishable under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that the petitioner was arrested during the investigation of the case, although, the FIR was lodged against unknown persons. It is further submitted that the alleged Motor-cycle was recovered from the possession of co-accused Sanjay Kumar Mahto who has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.11735/2009 on 210.5.2009. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State on perusal of the Case diary submits that while the petitioner was arrested, on his confessional statement the alleged Motor-cycle in question was recovered from the possession of co-accused Sanjay Kumar Mahto to whom the petitioner was alleged to have sold the Motor-cycle in question. It is further submitted that there were other serious materials which have come during the 2 investigation which implicated the petitioner in commission of the aforesaid offences and as such the case of Sanjay Kumar Mahto who has been allowed bail, stands on a different footing. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected for the present. SKBOSE (Shailesh Kumar Sinha)