IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.416 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2011 Hemant Kumar Khullar . . .Petitioner Versus Harjot Singh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Ekta Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order dated 10.01.2011 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh by which application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) for amendment of the written statement has been declined by imposing costs of Rs.500/-. While dismissing the application, the Court has observed that petitioner has not verified from the Registrar of Companies about M/s Clutch India Private Limited rather documents Ex.PW1/E, Ex.PW1/H and Ex.PW1/G proves that M/s Clutch India Private Limited as a company exists. The Court has also found that application is filed at the fag end of the trial. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed with Rs.5000/- as costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) January 20, 2011 JUDGE vivek