IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46511 of 2008 1. LAKRI RAI 2. Jitendra Rai ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR …Opposite party ----------- 2. 20.1.2009. Heard both sides. On perusal of annexure- 2 and 3 it would appear that none of the eye witnesses has named petitioner no. 1 Lakri Rai in any manner. Under the facts and circumstances, petitioner no. 1, namely, Lakri Rai is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Danapur in connection with Maner P. S. case No. 84 of 2008. So far the case of petitioner no. 2 Jitendra Rai is concerned, both the eye witnesses have named this petitioner though not as an assailant. Under the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to release petitioner no. 2 Jitendra Rai on bail at this stage. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)