18 Vo 18.04.20LL Present: Mohd. Kauser Perwez, Adv. for the petitioners along with petitioners in person. Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State along with SI Anwar Khan, P.S. Bawana. Mr. G.B. Singh, Adv. for respondent no. 2 along with respondent no. 2 in person. Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 were married on 4th December, 2005. They could hardly live together for about 7 months. On the complaint of respondent rro. 2, FIR in question was registered on 16fr May, 2OO7 against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives i.e. petitioner nos. 2 to 8. Now, both the parties have settled their disputes amicably. Terms of settlement have been recorded in compromise/settlement deed dated 25fr Febru?ry, 20II (Annexure P2). Parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement. In terms of the settlement, petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have already obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 6ft April, 2OII from the Family Court, Rohini. In terms of the settlement, a sum of t2.50 lakhs has already been paid to respondent no. 2 by petitioner no. 1. Remaining settled amount of t50,000/- has been paid today to respondent no. 2 in the Court by the petitioner no. 1 by way of demand draft no. 655771 dated 25ft March, 20LL drawn on Punjab National Bank, Outer Quila Road, Rohtak, Haryana Branch. Respondent rto.2, who is present in the Court, has no objection in case the present FIR is quashed. Signing Date:17.08.2024 17:00:37 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified h Keeping in mind that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties more particularly, that petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceeding pending between them. Accordingly, in the larger interest, FIR No. 24812007 under Sections 498-A1406 IPC registered at Police Station Bawana and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J. April 18, 2O11 ga