IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 67 of 2011(S) -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20278/2010 DATED 13/10/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- PATTUVARDHANAN , RETIRED SANITATION WORKER, CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, KIZHAKKEMANGALAM ARATTUVAZHY WARD, ALAPPUZHA-7) BY ADV. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- MOHAMAD HUWAIZE, AGED AND SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY,CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY, CHENGANNUR- 689 121. BY ADV. SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN, SC, CHENGANNUR MUNICIPALITY. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs Con.Case(C).No. 67 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE I: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13/10/2010 IN WP(C) NO. 20278/2010. ANNEXURE II: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22/10/2010 FORWARDED BY THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE III: COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR RECEIPT OF JUDGMENT AND LETTER BY THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE IV: COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF PENSION ARREARS PAYABLE TO THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT'S OFFICE. ANNEXURE V: COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED 01/02/2011 GIVEN TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE RESPONDENT'S OFFICE. ANNEXURE VI: COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.541/2005/FIN. DATED 17/12/2005. ANNEXURE VII: COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.120/2007/FIN. DATED 20/03/2007. ANNEXURE VIII: COPY OF THE G.O.(MS) NO.153/2007/LSGD DATED 07/06/2007. ANNEXURE IX: COPY OF THE COMPUTATION OF DA ARREARS AS PER ANNEXURE VI AND ANNEXURE VII. ANNEXURE X: COPY OF THE COMPUTATION OF SALARY ARREARS FOLLOWING ANNEXURE IX GOVERNMENT ORDER. RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case (C) No. 67 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 8th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T It is now admitted by both parties that for complying with the directions in the judgment, the Municipality is liable to pay Rs.3751/- more. Counsel for the Municipality submits that the amount would be paid within one month. This is recorded and the contempt case is closed. If the amount is not so paid, the petitioner would be free to file a petition for restoration of the contempt case to file. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/