IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2010 / 7TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1122 of 2010(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.B.VINOD KUMAR, MANGALATH HOUSE, PARAMBITHARA ROAD, KOCHI-682 036. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SMT.DHANYA CHANDRAN SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, COCHIN CITY, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31. 2. CORPORATION OF KOCHI, BOAT JETTY, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-11, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI-20, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA ADV. SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA,SC,COCHIN CORPORATI FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.1122 OF 2010 (M) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's complaint is that despite having made Ext.P1, a representation to the 2nd respondent for taking action against the vendors who have occupied the footpath and are conducting business, causing obstruction to the passengers and parking of vehicles, no action has been taken by the 2nd respondent. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent obtaining instructions in the matter. Counsel submits that Ext.P1 has been received. It is stated that against the vendors mentioned by the petitioner, action is being taken. Since the receipt of the complaint is admitted, it is incumbent on the part of the 2nd respondent to take necessary action, based on Ext.P1. This the 2nd respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible and if necessary taking the assistance of the first respondent as well. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :