jpc appln4596-10.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO. 4596 OF 2010 Chandrakant H. Gandhi ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents and others Mr. Rajkumar Kamble h/f M/s Law Juris, for the applicant Mrs.S.D. Shinde, APP for the State Smt. Shital Turakhia for respondent No.2 Mr. Sandbhar, P.I. Tilaknagar Police station- I.O. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 25th July, 2011. P.C. : 1. Mr. Kamble, the learned advocate for the applicant prays for keeping the matter back. Since the application is pending for quite some time and since in the past also, adjournments were sought for by the applicant, the prayer to adjourn the matter, or to keep the matter back, is rejected. 2. I have gone through the application. I have gone through the bail order. 3. Mrs. Turakhia, the learned advocate for respondent no.2, informs me that there have been civil proceedings between the parties jpc appln4596-10.sxw 2 and interim orders were passed by the Court. She informs that thereafter, the parties have filed consent terms in the court. Apart from this, the Investigating Officer, who is present before me, states that the investigating agency does not require the detention of respondent No.2 in custody. He confirms the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent no.2 that respondent no.2 has been attending the Police Station and that he has made himself available for investigation/interrogation whenever required by the Investigating Officer. 4. Even otherwise, the bail order was passed on 13th August, 2010. The respondent No.2 has, thereafter, been co-operating with the investigating agency in the matter of investigation. No case for cancellation of bail is made out. 5. The application is rejected. ` (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)