1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P No.11046 of 2011 M.Thulasiamani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kallimanthayam Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer:This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.08.2011 and to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life, and his property as per law within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents 1 & 2:Mrs.Prabha Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER Seeking a direction to give police protection to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.08.2011 and to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life, and his property as per law, the petitioner has come up with the present petition. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in respect of a pathway, there was a rival claim between the present petitioner and his neighbours. In respect of that, the petitioner has preferred a complaint before the second respondent. Even though the accused persons made an undertaking in writing, before the second respondent, that they would not disturb the petitioner in future, again on 05.08.2011, they obstructed the petitioner in the pathway. For which, he also again approached the second respondent for taking action against the accused persons. In spite of that, there is no action. Hence, he approached this Court for the relief as prayed for. 3.In my considered opinion, since there appears to be some dispute regarding immovable property, under Section 482 Cr.P.C, a direction for enjoying the said property cannot be granted at all. The remedy for the petitioner lies elsewhere either before the civil court or in any other manner known to law. In view of all these reasons, I do not find any https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 reason to issue a direction. Hence this petition deserves to be dismissed. 4.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy in the manner known to law. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Writs) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kallimanthayam Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. vs Crl.O.P.(md).No.11046 of 2011 20.10.2011 TR : 08.11.2011 : 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/