1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER FROM ORDER FROM ORDER NO.348 OF 2002 NO.348 OF 2002 NO.348 OF 2002 Shankarrao Dattatray Sambhare ...Appellant Vs. Sou.Surekha @ Vijaya Shivajirao Jadhav and others ...Respondents Shri A.B.Borkar for the Appellant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JANUARY 10, 2005. JANUARY 10, 2005. JANUARY 10, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Shri Borkar, learned Counsel for the Appellant states that this Appeal is preferred for challenging the interim order passed during the pendency of civil suit. He states that the parties have settled the dispute and in fact consent decree has been passed in the suit. A copy of consent decree has been annexed to Civil Application No.1098 of 2004. 2. In view of the consent decree, nothing survives in the Appeal and the same is disposed of with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.