SB Crlmb No.8054/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.8054/2010. Deepak Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : August 25, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri C.M. Sharma for the petitioner. Shri Peeyush Kumar Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He in fact is a student of I.T.I. Mathura. Co-accused Mukesh and Sanju against whom allegation of causing injury was there, have already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the court below itself. Co- accused Gopal was also extended the benefit of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28/7/2010 passed in S.B.Cr.Misc.Bail Application No.6713/2010. Injury that has been assigned to the petitioner is simple in nature. There is no other criminal case pendinga against the present petitioner, who is a student. SB Crlmb No.8054/10. 2 Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application but could not dispute the factual submissions made above. Having regard to the facts aforesaid and considering all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to extend the benefit of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. In the result, this anticipatory bail application u/S.438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Deepak S/o Shri Devi Sahai, he be released by the S.H.O./I.O. in F.I.R. No.208/2009 P.S. Uchchain, District Bharatpur for offence u/Ss.143, 332, 353 and 336 IPC, on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to his satisfaction with the following conditions: 1. that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2. that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3. that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil