00 :/25 WRIT PETITIO No“; 3W ? Occupatmn Serv1c grlcuura arem Board {Ralpur R/ hubham V1har Mang Chhattlsgar Sta Agrlcultural Marketm J P Su awanshl S/o Late Sr'lrl Goplram aged 42 ye s e presently posted as Junlor Stat1st1cal Aselstant 1n C G State Altl Mktg o ’ ' f ’ S la h te g XI-HC—78 Lma x-m gm¢rf of m$m$ $11200 i i i l ‘ $Wauéa£ 1 Petitioner by Shri lndrasen Sahu,‘ Advocate. Respondents by Sh m#w 1 " \ 2.9.2005 and Additional Advocate , Panel lawyer. l Heani ' petitloner was appomted Leaxned counsel fJ-r the peunoner submts that the; ‘ 13.9.1989 Thereafter the ' the year 1998 when the was abolished and the se1v1ce of the pettttoner was merged at I the post of. Assisfam Respondent] Boani. 2.2001 the then Managing Director, ‘ ‘Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipdan‘Board revived the‘post of ‘ Junior Stau'sh'cal Assistant at the pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000. As a result the petitioner iwas absorbed asAssistant Grade-III W.e.f. 13.7.1998.The peq'tioner conh'nued 'towork h'll the 1 petitioner was again sent back to the post of Assistant Grade- By order' dated 29. II i Pmshant Mishxa, Senior Advocate General with Shn' Vivek Shalma, ’ »' as Jumor Statlsucal Assistant on petitioner continued: in service till post of Jumor Stahstlcal Assxstant ? Grade-III m the, semees of ‘ ‘ WWWW {JARFQQ 3 mmm$ marm(m) . mmmma Illby order dated 25th July 2005 (Annexure P/ 14) passed by fhe Respondent No 2 The penuoner submxts that the xmpugned order dated P/ 14), oxder dated 27th July, 2005 V " r dated 3 8 2005(Annexure P/ 16) followmg the prmc1ples of natural _ ,- serves to be quashed; - ta, learned Senior Advocate and al' appemingv for [the lesponde’nts § submits that admittedly; no notioe was given to the petitioner but there is no iniirmitf 11 pefsolis who were workm have vbeen\ Ifeveitedand p( July, i998. ~ I ‘ :H’owever, learned co‘ r will be given an opportunity of_' *1— , _ aiWanéel 25th July, 2005 (Annexum (Annexare P/ 1‘5) and prde have been passed w1thout jdstice a5 slich the same de I Shn‘ mashant Mish r Addih'bnél Advocate Genel submits that the petiu‘bne msel for the respondents further E cause notice to hJm and aft L the orders because several other : g as Jumor Stahstlcal Asmsfant )Stedr as Assistant Glade-III W.e.f.v g:3 a A er $ing of reply by hlm Xl-HC'-78 hearing and his. case Will Le considered after issue df show r~ ‘ Xl-Ho78 a: .‘ WW aim ’ § ”5&95“ 3H7j03 mmm§ ....... .........‘.... ........... I...... “20 anéetm (W) ' 3‘ fl/ mm#mm $Wani31 . ‘ ’ mmwmat the petlhoner has worked as Jumor , Admlttedly, Statlshcal Ass1stant mm ecember, 2001 till July, 2005 The ‘I‘petltloner has acqmrcd 1 a1 nghts as such h1s nghts cannot o: be mfnnged or taken aw y m faJr play W1thout affordmg an -~' V ‘ opportumty of heanng mg, the petih'on is allowed and the In v1ew of the foreg 4; impugned orders dated 2005 (Annexures P] 14 >, respondents are at liberty Show cause notice to the reply] representation to pass Iappropn'ate orders. There shall j be no order as to costs. 9 r 5th and 27th July, and' 3rd August, § ' V P/ 15 and 13/16) an: quashed. The to take appropriate steps by issuing petitioner and after considen'ng his 3‘ Sd/— : Sh_ K Agnmmn ‘ udge j J Certified eopy, as per Rules 0 I .