IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 15TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 30627 of 2003(U) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- USHAKUMARI, D/O.NALINI, VENGASSERY VELIKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, KARAKONAM, KUNNATHUKAL DESOM, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. SAROJINI AMMA, D/O. NARAYANI PILLA, EIKONATHU VADAKUMKARA CHAMMANNUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MEKKOLLA, KOLLAIL VILLAGE FROM VENGASSERY VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL DESOM, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATINKARA. 2. THANKAMMA D/O. NARAYANI PILLAI, EIKONATHU VADAKUMKARA CHAMMANNUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, MEKKOLLA, KOLLAIL VILLAGE FROM VENGASSERY VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL DESOM, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. GANGADHARAN PILLA, S/O. KUMARA PILLAI, KIZHKKEPERUKATHALA PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL DESOM, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATINKARA. 4. GOMATHI PILLA THANKACHI, KIZHAKKEPERUKATHALA PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL DESOM, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA. 5. JANAKI AMMA VASANTHAKUMARI, KIZHAKKEPERUKATHALA PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL DESOM, KUNNATHUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA. W.P.(C) NO.30627/2003 ADDL.R6 TO R12 ARE IMPLEADED R6. VELAPPAN NAIR, S/O. LATE SRI.GANGADHARAN NAIR, PERATHALA VILAKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL, KARAKKONAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. R7. INDIRA DEVI, S/O.GOMATHI PILLAI THANKACHI, PERATHALA VILATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, KUNNATHUKAL, KARAKKONAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. R8. MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR, S/O. GANGADHARAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. R9. RENUKA DEVI, D/O. GOMATHI PILLAI THANKACHI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. R10. SREEKUMARI, D/O. GOMATHI PILLAI THANKACHI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. R11. REVEENDRAN NAIR, S/O. GANGADHARAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. R12. SREEKUMARAN NAIR, S/O. GANGADHARAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. ADDL.R6 TO R12 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT.18.1.07 IN IA.NO.890/2007. BY ADV. SRI.AJESH. M.R. - R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... W.P.(C)No.30627 OF 2003 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 J U D G M E N T Even after four years of its institution, this Writ Petition is remaining defective on the reason that service is not completed. On going through the orders dated 3.1.2006 and 18.1.2007, it is seen that the petitioner was not very enthusiastic in the matter of completing service. There is no representation for the petitioner. The Writ Petition will stand dismissed for default. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0. -2- WP(C)N0. -3- WP(C)N0. -4-