IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11103 of 2008 MAHENDRA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 12.5.2008 Heard the learned Advocate of the petitioner namely Mahendra Rai and also the learned Advocate of the informant. The learned Advocate of the petitioner submitted that by order on several occasions prayer of the bail application of the petitioner was rejected but while rejecting the prayer of bail application of the petitioner on 30.11.2006 it was observed by this Court that if the trial is not concluded within six months then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after expiry of the said period. Learned Advocate of the petitioner further submitted that again this Court observed on 16.07.2007 that if the trial is not concluded within a period of three months the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Learned Advocate further submitted that on both occasions the trial court did not follow the direction of this Court and the period fixed by this court has already expired and as such he has renewed the prayer of the bail. On the other hand the learned Advocate of the informant submitted that the trial is at last stage but the defence is creating to hardle in disposal of the case and that is why the case is pending before the trial court. Considering the submission of both the sides, it is hereby ordered that the trial court shall try to dispose of the case - 2 - within a further period of two months failing which the trial court shall enlarge the petitioner on bail on conditions imposed by the trial court. Accordingly this Cr. Misc. application is disposed of. Uday/ ( Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J.)