1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2248 OF 2005 PETITION NO.2248 OF 2005 PETITION NO.2248 OF 2005 H.V. Madge ..Petitioner Vs. Chembur Trombay Education Society Ltd. & Ors.. Respondents Mr. Mihir Desai, for the Petitioner Mr. Abhay Patki, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Rui Rodrigues for respondent No.3. Mr. A.M. Abdi i/b. Abdi & Co.,for Respondent No.5. Mr. M.D. Naik, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 15TH DECEMBER, 2006 15TH DECEMBER, 2006 15TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith.It is the case of the petitioner that the post considering the necessary advertisement had to be dereserved. The respondents contrary to that have selected the respondent No.5. In the meantime the College has already forwarded the proposal to the University. There is an interim relief presently running. Considering the above, the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions:- (i) The University has already received the proposal for dereservation from the College. The University to forward the same to the State Government within four weeks from today. The State Government thereafter to take a decision on the same at any rate not later than eight weeks from the date 2 of communication from the University according to law. Till such time the interim order passed by this Court will continue. If the Respondents havel any grievance it is open to them to take such steps according to law. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).