IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9494 of 2009 DEEPAK KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 08.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 384, 385 and 396 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is that the accused persons, including the petitioner were demanding rangdari through their mobile phones but there is no allegation that rangdari amount was ever paid to them. He further submits that the entire allegation is false and frivolous and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent but inspite of that he is in jail custody since January, 2009. He also submits that other co- accused persons, namely, Kundan Kumar and Ram Babu Singh alias Amar Kumar have been ordered to be enlarged on bail on a common order of this Court dated 12.01.1989 passed in Cr. Misc. .41585 of 2008 and Cr. Misc. No. 46405 of 2008. respectively. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition for bail is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Deepak Kumar be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00( Rupees ten thousand only ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, n 2 connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 212 of 2008 dated 24.06.2008. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )