IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 4389, 4360, 4315 and 4407 of 2010. Decided on: 21st September,, 2010. 1. CWP No. 4389 of 2010. Anuj Thakur & others. Vs State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 4360 of 2010. Anil Verma & others. Vs State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 4315 of 2010. Abhishek Bagwan.. Vs State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 44407 of 2010. Shweta Dhiman & others. Vs State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG, for the respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petitions are filed mainly with the following prayers: “ (i) That issuance of the advertisement dated 24.7.2010 vide Annexure P-3 and the action of the respondents in holding fresh selection for the post of Lecturer in Electronics Engineering; lecturer in Instrumentation Engineering; lecturer in Computer Applications in Govt Polytechnic, Kangra on temporary i.e. lecture-wise/period- wise basis may kindly be quashed and set-aside. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to continue/reemploy the petitioner as a Lecturer in Electronics Engineering; Lecturer in Instrumentation; lecturer in Computer Applications in Govt. Polytechnic, Kangra till they are replaced by regular appointees, if any, with all consequential benefits forthwith.” ( prayers identical in all the petitions). 2 2. In the reply, it is stated at paragraph 9(s) as follows: “ 9 (s). …….. It is further respectfully submitted that the intention of the respondents is not to remove the petitioners but to fill up posts and to prepare new panel of qualitative faculty to ensure availability of faculty in case any engaged faculty leave the institution in haste in the mid session and for smooth running of academic affairs in the better interest of students.” 3. The above submission is recorded and the Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the submission recorded above. The petitioners shall be paid their due and admissible salary for the period they were in service. 4. The Writ Petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. September 21, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (karan) Judge.