IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4155 of 2009 1. AYUB ANSARI, S/o Late Bahadur Ansari. 2. Harun Ansari, S/o Khedaru Ansari. 3. Jainudin Ansari, S/o Late Jalaludin Ansari. 4. Doa Hakim Ansari, S/o Late Hakik Ansari. 5. Anwar Ansari, S/o Mokhtar Ansari. 6. Inteyaz @ Dhorai Ansari, S/o Wakil Ansari. 7. Saiful Ansari, S/o Late Hakik Ansari. All resident of Village-Bastha, P.S.-Mainatad, District-West Champaran. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Samiullah, S/o Late Sk. Manzar Alam, Resident of Village Bastha, P.S.-Mainatad, District-West Champaran. ----------- 02. 04.08.2010 The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of cognizance dated 23.07.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran by which he has taken cognizance under Section 363 IPC in connection with Complaint Case No. 1588C of 2006 (Tr. No. 2324 of 2007) treating the protest as a complaint and thereafter held an inquiry into the matter. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that police after investigation had found the allegations against the accused persons as false and in fact the son of the complainant had not been kidnapped and the accused had been implicated on account of a dispute between them. 2 However, considering that cognizance has been taken after due inquiry on the materials contained therein. I am not impressed with the submission. This application is therefore dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)