IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 6615-M of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : 01.02.2007 Satpal Singh .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. S.S. Majithia, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * Petitioner Satpal Singh, who is complainant in case FIR No. 56 dated 2.3.2002 under Sections 420, 384, 511, 465, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Amritsar, has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the charge sheet dated 19.7.2006 whereby charge under Sections 420 and 506 IPC has been framed against the accused, and the order dated 4.9.2006, passed by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar, whereby the application filed by the prosecution for amendment of the charge on the ground that charge under Sections 384, 465 and 511 IPC should also be framed has been dismissed. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the contents of the charge sheet as well as the impugned order. The petitioner is seeking quashing of the order dated 4.9.2006, passed by the trial court, on the ground that charges have not been properly framed and after setting aside the order, the matter be remitted to the trial court with a direction to frame charge afresh against the accused. Crl. Misc. No. 6615-M of 2007 -2- After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order, as on the basis of the material available on record, the proper charge has been framed against the accused under Sections 420 and 506 IPC. Dismissed. February 01, 2007 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE