IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 W.P(C).No. 33324 of 2008(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: VALSAMMA JOSEPH, HEADMISTRESS, GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOL, PAKKAM, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, KERALA GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARAGOD. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR. 5. MRS. INDIRA, HEADMISTRESS, GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, MANATHARA KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI. NARAYANAN. P, HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOKKALLOOR, KOZHIKODE. 7. SRI. ACHUTHAN PARAMMAL, HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOOTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 33324 OF 2008 (P) ==================== Dated this the 12th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, hailing from Kannur, was transferred to Kasargod. By Ext.P2, she represented to the 2nd respondent against Ext.P1. It is stated that despite Ext.P2, by Ext.P3, the 6th respondent was given a posting ignoring Ext.P2. Again she represented by submitting Ext.P4 and by Ext.P5, the 7th respondent, who according to the petitioner, another inferior claimant, was transferred. Faced with these circumstances, petitioner submitted Ext.P6, pointing out a vacancy at GHS, Thiruvangad and in this writ petition, while the petitioner is complaining against the proceedings evidenced by Exts. P1, P3 and P5, having regard to the fact that petitioner's representation Ext.P6 is pending before the 2nd respondent, I feel that at this stage the 2nd respondent should decide the matter. 2. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if Ext.P6 has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent shall take up, consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a WPC 33324/08 :2 : copy of this judgment. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp