IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 03.12.2010 COCP No.1781 of 2010 Dev Singh and another ...Petitioner Versus Mohinder Singh Sahota and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Jatinder Nagpal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. S.S.Sahu, AAG, Punjab. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) This Court in a writ petition filed by the petitioner directed the Block Development and Panchayat Officer to examine the list Annexure P-8 and in case it is found that the gair mumkin pond is in unauthorized occupation of any other person, it shall proceed in accordance with law with the provisions of the Act. The exercise of identifying unauthorized occupants was to be completed within one month. In a short reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, it is pointed out that the respondents have initiated proceedings for eviction of 77 unauthorized occupants as per the demarcation report dated 18.08.2010. Mr. Bhandohal, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, submits that list of 77 unauthorized person given by the petitioner, includes Jagpal Singh son of Sher Singh, the person mentioned by the petitioner in para 2 of the contempt petition. In view of the fact that the proceedings for eviction of unauthorized occupants have been initiated, the present contempt petition is COCP No.1781 of 2010 disposed of with a direction to the Collector to decide such eviction proceedings expeditiously preferably within a period of six months. 03.12.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2