^ Petitioner H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Art.227i No.704 of 2011 State of Chhattisgarh Through: The CoUector, Durg (C.G.) „ Respondents Versus The Chhattisgarh Board of Revenue BHaspur (Circuit Court Raipur? Through : The Registrar, Raipur Lok Das, S/o iViohan Das, R/o Mujgahan, Patwari Circle No.2, Tahsil Dondilohara, Distrtet Durg (Writ Petition underArticie 227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) 1. 2. Mr.Sushit Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the petitioner/State. Mr.Ashok Vaishnav, counsel for respondent No.2. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shanna, J.) ORDER (11-10-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Articte 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner/State has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 30.11.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, Biiaspur, Circuit Court, Raipur, in Revenue Rsvision Case No.R.N./05/R/A-1/121/09. 2. At the outset, iearned counsel forrespondent No.1 by producing certified copy of the order dated 24.1.2011 passed in W.P. (227) No.5593 of 201 O submits that except the order condoning deiay and filing the revision before the Additionai Commissioner, rest part of the impugned order be quashed by this Court in exercise of supervisory jurisdtotion, therefore, virtuaily substantive part of order is not in existence. 3. li 1 the light ofthe order dated 24.1.20) 1 passed in W.P. (227) No-5593 of 2010, the writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge A