WA 16/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BISWAS THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISKHIKESH ROY Heard Mr P Khataniar, learned counsel for the appellant and the learned State counsel. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.11.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 250(K) of 2005 whereby the appoi ntment of the writ appellant, who was arrayed as respondent No. 4 in the writ pe tition to the post of Head Driver, has been set aside with direction to the resp ondent authority to re-consider the matter in accordance with the provisions of law. The grievance raised on behalf of the appellant is that the order dated 24th October, 1983 was not taken into consideration while the impugned judgment was passed. Mr. Khataniar submits that while considering promotion to the post o f Head Driver in terms of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, the auth orities may also be asked to consider the order dated 24th October, 1983. We dispose of this appeal with the observation that the respondent State while considering promotion to the post of Head Driver shall act in terms of th e order dated 24.11.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 250(K) of 2005 including all circulars, rules and the order dated 24th October, 1983. No costs.