IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16230 of 2010 1. SOHI MANJHI, S/o Lakhan Manjhi. 2. Narain Manjhi, S/o Lakhan Manjhi. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 447, 504 and 379/34. Considering that the petitioners defaulted in appearance for two days on account of which their bail was cancelled but they have remained in custody since 12.03.2010, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-5, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with S.Tr. No. 834 of 2005 arising out of Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 56 of 2002 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the 2 petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)