IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3935 of 2011() ------------------------------ CR. NO.1016/2011 OF KUNNIKODE POLICE STATION DD. 488/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT -III, PUNALUR ....... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 1 TO 3 --------------------------------------- 1. MANOJ, MANOJ BHAVAN, PANDRANDU MURI, PANTHAPLAVU, PATTAZHY, KOLLAM. 2. THANKACHAN, MANOJ BHAVAN, PANDRANDU MURI,PANTHAPLAVU, PATTAZHY, KOLLAM. 3. MARY, MANOJ BHAVAN, PANDARANDU MURI, PANTHAPLAVU, PATTAZHY, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.SYAM J SAM SMT.AATHIRA RAJU RESPONDENT(S): STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SALI, 24 YEARS, D/O.ROSAMMA, MUKALUVILA VEEDU, EDAMON, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM - 691 012. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs CRMC. NO.3935/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1:COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CC 488/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - III, PUNALUR. ANNEXURE A2:AN AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT STATING THE SETTLEMENT OF ALL THE DISPUTES. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.3935 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of November 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.488/2011 on the file of J.F.C.M.-III, Punalur. The offence alleged against them is under Sec.498A r/w 34 of IPC. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant therein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. Affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent stating that the matter has been settled out of court and that she has no further grievance in the matter. Since the dispute is purely personal in nature, it is just and proper that this petition is allowed. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in C.C.No.488/2011 on the file of J.F.C.M.-III, Punalur is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt