IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2787 of 2007 MAULESHWAR PRASAD SON OF LATE SINGHESHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HAREWA P.S. HALSI DISTRICT – LAKHI SARAI PRESENTLY RESIDNG AT SIKANDRA NAWATOLI (PURANI BAZAR) P.S. SIKANDRA DISTRICT - JUMAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE IRRIGATION COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (IRRIGATION), BHAGALPUR. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT BHAGALPUR. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DIVISION SIKANDRA (JAMUI) DISTRICT JUMAI. 6. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR REVENUE DIVISION TARAPUR (MUNGER) DISTRICT MUNGER. 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION DIVISION TARAPUR (MUNGER) 8. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, JUMAI. 9. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, JUMAI. 10. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 5. 03.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non-payment of full amount of the dues which have remained to be paid with respect to Provident Fund since March, 1980 to 1981 and, thereafter, again from March, 2000 to February, 2001 with statutory interest. He further submits that payment of commutation value of pension was sanctioned in July 2005; however, the payment has been made in the year, 2008. As such, 2 petitioner suffered from huge loss on account of loss of interest. Besides the above, it is further submitted that the department had not sanctioned the increment to him which affecting the pensionary benefits. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a fresh and detailed representation stating his claim, the same shall be considered as per law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claim, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 5 within a period of four weeks from today enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of his claim alongwith the certified copy of the present order. In case such representation is filed, respondent no. 5 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if any claim is found admissible, the same shall be paid in accordance with law. However, if any of the claims found not admissible, the same shall also be 3 communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)