IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17560 of 2009 GAUTAM CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 23/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The claim in the application is to shift his date of regularization from 1.12.2006 to 13.4.2002. Faced with the predicament of delay in having filed the writ application nearly three years later, It is now submitted that the petitioner has represented on 25.7.2009 and in the event that the respondents consider his claim, the petitioner is willing to forego any monetary claims for the period in between 2002-06 and shall only seek that this period be counted for the purpose of computing his total period of service for pensionary benefits etc. In view of the nature of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, Counsel for the State has no objection if this writ application is disposed with the direction to consider his representation, but strictly in accordance with law within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)