1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 166/2008 (Baba Vyankatrao Turale Vs. The Chief Gen. Manager & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MAY 5, 2008. Heard Mr. Nalamwar for the petitioner, and Mr. R.K. Deshpande for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. Writ petition is directed against the impugned communication dated 4/1/2008 issued by the respondent no.2- Company, whereby the petitioner is reverted for non-submission of documents to be forwarded to the Caste Scrutiny Committee, for verification. It is brought to the notice of the Court that the petitioner, on earlier occasion, had filed writ petition wherein an undertaking was given by the petitioner that the Caste Certificate along with other 2 documents, would be submitted to the respondents within a stipulated period. However, the petitioner failed to submit the documents within the said period and, therefore, the respondents were required to take the impugned action. In the backdrop of the above referred fact, there is no case made out to show any indulgence, particularly because the petitioner was given appointment from the Scheduled Tribe category and, therefore, it was necessary for the petitioner to submit the Caste Certificate as well as other documents to the respondents for forwarding them to the Caste Scrutiny Committee for necessary verification. This is not a case where the petitioner has submitted the said documents to the respondents and the matter was pending before the Caste Scrutiny Committee, for verification. On the other hand, it appears that in spite of the undertaking given by the petitioner before this Court on earlier occasion, the petitioner failed to comply with the said undertaking. In that view of the matter, the 3 impugned order, according to us, is sustainable in law. However, it is open for the petitioner to submit necessary documents to the respondents for forwarding it to the Caste Scrutiny Committee. For the reasons stated herein above, writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RMP