IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5709 of 2010 RADHESHYAM RAI @ RADHESHYAM YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.02.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 379 of the Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act is that the informant himself states that an unknown person fired at him when the impugned order of rejection only notices that there was material against the petitioner but does not state what that material is. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Bhojpur at Ara in Sandesh PS Case No. 6 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)