IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43031 of 2010 BINOD KUMAR son of Tunni Singh, R/o village Bhikhua, P.s.-Fatuhan, Dist-Patna. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.3.2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 302, 120B/34 of the Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case as nobody has seen the occurrence and the medical report shows that it was death on account of electrocution. The doctor who conducted autopsy has not found any ante mortem injury rather all the injuries were post-mortem injuries 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused persons namely Tunni Singh, Sidheswar Singh and Bihari Singh have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 03.05.2010 and 26.05.2010 passed by different Benches of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 13905 of 2010 and Cr. Misc. No. 1367/2010. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner, namely, Binod Kumar, is directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail 2 bond of Rs. 10,000.00(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Fatuhan P.S. Case No. 399 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Prakash (S.N.Hussain, J.)