1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4023/2007 (Salim & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : August 24, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioners. Mr.V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application filed by petitioners No.1 Salim and No.3 Hamid, however, seeks a liberty to file a fresh bail application after the challan is filed. The bail application filed by petitioners No.1 Salim and No.3 Hamid is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed with the liberty sought for. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as the police investigation diary. It is alleged that petitioner No.2 Rafique Mohd. armed with a lathi and no injury by blunt object on the skull is alleged to have been caused to the injured. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner No.2 Rafiqe Mohd. on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed by petitioner No.2 Rafique Mohd. s/o Chand Mohd. under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that he be released on bail in FIR No.95/2007, P.S. Kotadi, Distt. Bhilwara provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-