THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.7569 of 2009 DATED:17.09.2009 Between: G.Peter Charles and others .. Petitioners And G.Vijaya Nirmala and another .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.7569 of 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri B.Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri A.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the second respondent. No notice is being ordered to the first respondent, as the matter is being disposed of, at the stage of admission. Crime No.866 of 2009 of Uppal Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District was registered against the petitioners under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act on the written report of the first respondent. The written report made detailed allegations about the various overt acts of the petitioners. It is also true that the major part of the misconduct against the first respondent was alleged to be by the first petitioner, but the allegations do not absolve the petitioners 2 and 3 altogether. The petitioners in the criminal petition claimed to be innocent, denied the alleged offences and present their own version for the failure of the marital life. The allegations of the first respondent and the denials of the petitioners thus involve disputed questions of fact enquiring into which for any conclusive determination, is outside the province of the restricted enquiry under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The inherent jurisdiction available only in the rarest of rare cases cannot be utilized to convert the High Court into a substitute for the investigating agency or the trial Court and what all involved are only disputed questions of fact, which cannot be gone into by this Court. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ___________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J 17th September 2009 KH