IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1774 of 2011(V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- ARYASREE.A., AGED 13 YEARS, D/O.ASOKAN, SREERAGAM, P.O.KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY FATHER ASOKAN.N., S/O.T.P.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, SREERAGAM, P.O.KONGAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT AND GUARDIAN. BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, GENERAL CO-ORDINATOR, KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM-2010-2011, KOTTAYAM. 686 001. 2. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, GENERAL CONVENOR, KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011, KOTTAYAM. 686 001. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD, 678 001, CHAIRMAN OF APPEAL COMMITTEE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 678 001, CONVENOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011. 5. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.1774 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 18th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Palakkad Revenue District School Kalolsavam, petitioner participated in item Keralanadanam and was awarded A grade. Complaining that on account of the defect of the CD player, petitioner had to dance without any music or background, she filed an appeal which was rejected by Ext.P1 order. Ext.P1 order shows that in the report of the Stage Manager, the allegation of the petitioner was reported to be incorrect. On that basis, the appeal was decided. Apart from the averments in the writ petition, petitioner has not produced any material to prove her contention or to prove that the report of the Stage Manger relied on in Ext.P1 is incorrect. In such circumstances, this Court will not be justified in accepting the unsubstantiated averments in the writ petition and upset the prizes awarded. Writ petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy / P.A to Judge W.P (C) No. 2010 2