IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16842 of 2010 LALIT SAH @ LALIT SAHU, S/o Jiya Lal Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the marriage had taken place about sixteen years ago and therefore it is not a case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code where the question of presumption would arise against the in-laws. It has further been submitted that in the post-mortem examination report the cause of death was given due to strangulation is not reliable since the Doctor himself has noticed that the entire body was burnt. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 20.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Arer P.S. 2 Case No. 79 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)