IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15022 of 2010 1. Nand Jee Singh S/O Bishundayal Singh R/O Ward No.9, Nagar Panchayat, Behia, Bhojpur (Ara), Deputy Chairman / Deputy Chief Councillor, Nagar Panchayat Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 2. Janki Singh S/O Suraj Singh R/O Ward No.14, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. + P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 3. Umesh Kumar Singh S/O Ganesh Prasad Singh R/O Ward No.1, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 4. Beby Devi W/O Lal Babu Yadav R/O Ward No.8, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 5. Nipa Devi W/O Satya Narayan Prasad R/O Ward No.5, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 6. Ramji Keshri S/O Bira Sah R/O Ward No.12, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 7. Anju Devi W/O Om Hari Prasad R/O Ward No.10, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 8. Raj Kishor Ram S/O Hiralal Ram R/O Ward No.11, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 9. Amit Kumar Rajesh S/O Haridwar Prasad R/O Ward No.6, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) – Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through Its Secretary Of Urban Development And Housing Department Government Of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Distt.- Ara 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jagdishpur, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 4. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) 5. Kiran Kumari W/O Shri Anil Kumar R/O Ward No.3, Nagar Panchayat Behia, P.O. And P.S.- Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara), At Present Chairman Cum Chief Councillor, Nagar Panchayat, Behia, Distt.- Bhojpur (Ara) – Respondents. 2 16.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities for issuance of notice for special meeting of the elected Councilors in order to pass a no confidence motion against the Chairman cum Chief Councilor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a writ petition being CWJC No. 18968/2011 has now been filed by the respondent against whom no confidence motion is to be decided. The date of the meeting has already been fixed which has led to 2 the filing of the writ petition by respondent no.5. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s prayer has been redressed by fixing a date for holding of special meeting, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is dismissed as such. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J .)