1 wp-999-2011 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 999 OF 2011 Shri Budheshwar Raghunath Gore ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents Mr.Ayaz Khan for petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for State. Mr.Sachin Dhakephalkar for original accused. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 19, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr.Ayaz Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner. We have also perused the affidavit in reply filed by Shri Satish Pawar, API from Panvel City Police Station. Ms.Mhatre, learned APP appears for the State. 2 wp-999-2011 2. We are satisfied that there is no case made out to transfer the on going investigation in M.E.C.R. No.20 of 2010 registered with Panvel City Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 403, 405, 406, 417, 418, 420, 426, 427, 463, 464, 467, 48, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, pursuant to the order passed by the 2nd Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Cass at Panvel on 12/10/2010 in RCC No.733 of 2010. At the same time we do feel that the on going investigation requires to be completed expeditiously as the CR has been registered way back on 16/10/2010. 3. Hence it is directed that the investigation in MECR No.20 of 2010 shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and final report shall be submitted to the learned 2nd Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Panvel before 31st August 2010. 4. Save and except the above directions, the petition stands rejected. All the rights and contentions of the parties are left open. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)