IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1109 of 2002. M/s. Raj Kumar & Company, Sawai Madhopur. VERSUS Sawai Madhopur Co-operative Land Development Bank Limited, Sawai Madhopur & Others Date Of Order ::: 24/04/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Ms. Raj Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner Mrs. Manju Dave, Addl.G.A., for the respondent No.3. None present for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 19.07.2000 (annexure-5) passed by the respondent No.1-Bank, whereby earnest money of the petitioner has been forfeited, and an order of its black listing has been passed. The ground to challenge this order is that this order has been passed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. However, from Annexure 2 & 3 dated 24.07.1999 and 19.08.1999 issued by the respondent-Bank, it is clear that an opportunity was given to the petitioner before passing the impugned order annexure- 5 dated 19.07.2000. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter contended that an inquiry under Section 70 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Society Act, 1965 was made without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is further contended that a copy of inquiry report has not been supplied to the petitioner. It is relevant to mention here that the inquiry report has not been challenged in this writ petition by the petitioner nor it was challenged before the respondent-Bank when a letter annexure-4 was written by the petitioner to the respondent-Bank. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file a representation before the respondent-Bank in respect of their grievances or to challenge the inquiry report before the appropriate forum in accordance with the law, and a further direction may be issued to the respondents to supply a copy of inquiry report to the petitioner and to decide the representation in accordance with the law. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file either a representation before the respondents about their grievances or to challenge the inquiry report made under Section 70 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Society Act, 1965 before the appropriate Forum in accordance with the law. In case, the representation is filed within a period of one-month from today, then the same may be disposed of in accordance with the law within a period of three-months thereafter. The cost is made easy. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/