IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2009 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1395 of 2009() ---------------------------------------------- CRIME NO.94/2009 OF MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION PETITIONER --------------------- 1. UJEESH, S/O. UNNIKRISHNAN, MULLASSERY HOUSE, AJA, S.N. PURAM, 2. MANIKANTAN, S/O. VINODAN, MULLASSERY HOUSE, ALA, S.N. PURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ========================= Bail Application No.1395 of 2009 ============================ Dated, this the 24th day of March, 2009 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.4 & 5 in Crime No.94 of 2009 of Mathilakam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143,147,148,341,324,326 & 307 read with 149 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 7.2.2009. The petitioners were arrested on 03.03.2009. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 24th day of March, 2009 V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj