CR No.38 of 2009. 10.04.2009 Present: Mr.S.D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Satyen Vaidya, Advocate, for the respondent. CR No.38 of 2009. The grievance of the petitioners in this petition is that a decree of eviction has been passed against them on the ground of reconstruction and rebuilding. Learned counsel submits that no sanction from the Municipal Corporation and competent Authority exercising powers under the Himachal Pradesh Road Side Land Control Act, has been obtained and the order of eviction therefore requires to be set aside. This petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the premises in dispute, pursuant to the order of eviction, unless the building plans are sanctioned in accordance with the Municipal Corporation Bye-laws/Rules, permission obtained from the competent Authority under the Himachal Pradesh Road Side Land Control Act (if required) or any other permission required from any other statutory Authority, if so mandated by law. It will be the duty of the executing Court to ensure that the eviction of the petitioners from the suit premises shall be effected only after proof of compliance with all statutory Rules, Orders, Bye-laws etc. governing the construction. There shall be no order as to costs. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. April 10, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.