IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13638 of 2006 RAMSAKHI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner :Mr. Surendra Kishore, Advocate For the State :Mr. Ritesh Kumar, JC to AAGI 02/ 23.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. From the impugned orders dated 9.1.1991, 31.3.1994 and 26.12.1995, passed by the Anchal Adhikari, DCLR and the Collector of the District, it is evident that private Respondent nos. 5 to 8 have been mutated on the basis of the registered deed and challenge to such mutation was even found in consonance with the orders passed by the Consolidation Authority, namely, the Deputy Director. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter and this writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)