IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8161 of 2008 Between: K.V.S.S. Sastry, S/o. K.V.S. Sarma, R/o. Plot No. 36, Sainagar Township, Deshmuki Road, Hayatnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 A.P Bhoodan Yagna Board, Rep by its Secretary, Gandhi Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not implementing the allotment proceedings of the 3rd respondent vide No. BYB/B/185/07 - 23275 to 23192, dt.30-10-2007 in the revenue records and not issing patta and Title Deeds as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, contrary to the provisions of the AP Bhoodan & Gramdan Act 7 rules and AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books 1971 and violative of Article 300A of the constitution of India and consequently a direction may be issued to the 2nd respondent to implement the same in revenue records and issue Pattas and title deeds ii) costs be awarded and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.MAHENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 8161 of 2008 Order: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not implementing the allotment proceedings dated 30.10.2007 of the 3rd respondent in the revenue records and not issuing pattadar passbook and title deeds as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to implement the allotment proceedings dated 30.10.2007 of the 3rd respondent in the revenue records and to issue Pattadar passbook and title deeds. When the matter is taken up for admission, it is represented by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue that the 2nd respondent is taking necessary steps by issuing notices to implement the orders of the 3rd respondent, and in view of that, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. Recording the said statement, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 11.06.2008 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}