^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION [S] N0; \&^ /2010 PETITIONER: ^>^ ^.'€^ -^5S%^ ..••' -s\/^<..--' ^S"'" fiti&f'^'^'^ .ov' .^•"^^•r ^ y^'' RESPONDENTS: Vs ;)g f^y-'"^-v'<'^ Manillal Sharma, son of Shri Tukaram, aged about 56 years, resident of Village Atari, P.0. Tendua, P.5. Aamanaka, Raipur. 1/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, / Secretariat, Raipur. 2. The Conservator of Forest, Raipur Forest bivision, (Seneral), Raipur. 3. The Joint Director, Treasury, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN&IA. ^"'^7°^ "v'- ^ Vy^^S^V g'y^fea^^ |J ^fc—e^yy 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERj. HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1676 OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Manlllal Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petitibn under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ajit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 19th day ofApril, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, learned counsel submits that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the pending representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own perspective, within a period ofsix weeks from the date of receipt of a copy this order. 3. In view of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. . 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Gowri 1 Judge