1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 44 of 2011 Israrul Haque FAzal Haque ..VERSUS.. In the Court of the Judge, Dist. and Sessions Judge, D.J.3, Nyay Mandir, Nagpur and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. D.M.Kale, A.P.P. for respondents/State CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 4 th Febru ary , 2011 . Heard Mr. D.M.Kale, learned APP for the respondents. By the present petition, the petitioner has sought for transfer of his criminal case. The grievance raised in the petition is that he was not given an opportunity to lead evidence/examine the witnesses. On earlier occasion, learned APP was requested to take instructions in the matter from his counter part. Today, the report is placed on record by learned APP in the Court. It is stated in the report that the applicant was represented through lawyer. It is further submitted that the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant/accused, moved an application before the learned District Judtge-3 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No. 137/2010 and his prayer was allowed. The learned Advocate cross-examined the prosecution witnesses. It is further stated in the report that the Special Criminal Case NO. 137/2010 is already disposed of by the learned District Judge and the applicant/accused is acquitted from the offence under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, by order dated 26/11/2010. In view of the report placed on record by the learned APP, 2 the grievance of the applicant is already redressed and there is no reason to pass any order in the matter. As such, the writ petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Diwale