IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16570 of 2011 SANJU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is named by the victim as one of her kidnappers while F.I.R. is to the effect that she was kidnapped by co-accused Dhaneshwar Paswan while she had gone to meet the call of nature and in that Dhaneshwar’s father Uma Shankar and uncle Ganesh Paswan along with Mahesh Paswan are shown involved. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been named only after coming of the victim to her family on their instigation as pending of T.S.No. 45/02 is in between both the families. Further submission is that it was love affair of the victim with Dhaneshwar Paswan. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional 2 Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 124/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)