IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 202 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 718 OF 2008 SHRI. BABI GAONKAR ... Applicant Versus CHANDRAKANT PARAB AND 8 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. P.H. Parab, Advocate for the respondents no.1 to 3. Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Govt. Advocate for the respondents no.4 and 5. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 17th March, 2009 P.C. The applicant herein is the original respondent no.6 in Writ Petition no.718/2008. The said Writ Petition is filed by respondents no.1, 2 and 3 herein. It is submitted by learned Counsel for the applicant that on wrong basis and on wrong factual data, the applicant was joined as party in original Writ Petition, though the applicant had not played any role nor had signed any certificate. The learned Counsel for the original petitioner has submitted that the applicant had not played any role in issuing certificate as the certificate was issued by someone else. Learned Counsel for the respondents no.1, 2 and 3 further submitted in this application that he was under the wrong impression that the certificate must have been issued by the present applicant. He has further submitted that he has no objection if the name of the original respondent no.6 is deleted in the said Writ Petition. 2. In view of the stand taken by the learned Counsel for the respondents no.1, 2 and 3, who are the original petitioners in the Writ Petition, the name of the applicant is permitted to be deleted from the Writ Petition. 3. We have clarified that if any departmental inquiry is pending against the respondents, the same shall not be affected in any manner by the orders of this Court. Similary, if any proceedings are pending before the Collector, the Collector is free to take his own decision as per law. 4. This MCA is allowed and the name of the applicant is to be deleted from the original Writ Petition. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J. ef.