IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14167 of 2009 AJAY SINGH @ AJAY KUMAR SINGH, son of Sri Manager Singh, resident of village-Sikuwara, P.S.-Nautan, District-Siwan ------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 31.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is alleged for committing rape upon the informant while submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that medical report does not support the commission of rape and there is contradiction about implicating him for taking away the victim and that is to the effect that in the F.I.R. it is said that the victim followed him with her younger sister and in the statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure she states about his insisting on to take her mother first and on her refusal victim along with her younger sister was taken. Similar contradictions are pointed out which I find not relevant to discuss at this stage. There is consistency in the allegation about commitment of rape. If no injury is found on the victim that also is not relevant, her statement is sufficient for constituting rape as penetration is only sufficient. The points raised also do not justify to give any liberty to the petitioner while deciding anticipatory bail. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )