: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.376 OF 200 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.376 OF 200 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1080 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1080 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1080 OF 2003 Rajeev Kumar Khaneja ...Applicant. V/s. C.B.I. & Anr. ...Respondents. Shri R.M.Tiwari, adv. for the Applicant. Smt.R.M.Gadhvi, APP for the Respondent No.1. Shri Y.S.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 10th April, 2007. DATE : 10th April, 2007. DATE : 10th April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant and Ms.Gadhvi, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. 2. The applicant was granted bail subject to his executing P.R.of Rs.1 lakh with one or more sureties in the like amount and he has already furnished the surety of his wife, who has taken solvency certificate against her particular property. As now she wants to dispose off that property, the applicant has moved this application seeking direction that he may be allowed to furnish cash security of Rs.1 lakh in lien of the surety of his wife Madhu R. Khaneja. Ms.Gadhvi, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 on instructions from the : 2 : concerned officer, makes a statement that the respondent no.1 has no objection. 3. Therefore, the application is allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a) and the applicant is allowed to furnish cash security of Rs.1 lakh in view of the surety furnished by his wife. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)