^•/^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF .TUDICATUBE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: WRrr_PETITON N0.'2-944-/ 2005, Ku.Shobha Rani Narang D/o Bhanwardas Narang, Aged about 20 years, R/<o Village Bharuvadih Khurd, Po Mohrenga .Tahsil Tilda, Distt- Raipur '(C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:- 1) .z^ •'f p'. 'iy ..'S'i W,v ^p ^^? ~^^ .-<* I ''''..*' ^y> -y 'y <>•• ^-;. -^f^.'^ •^f .\\' fe' 'i.0 ^ .^' i-!, ,} *^ .w^ .^- h'^iV^"' ^yr'-"' 2) 3) 4) 5) State of Chhattlsgarh Through: Secretary, Departinent of Panchayat & Rural Development, (Mantralaya) DKS, Bhawan Raipur(C. G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Pnachayat, Tilda, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) Ku.Rajanl Tara D/o Suryadan Kurrey, R/o Village PuraniBasti, Tilda, Tahsil- Tllda, Distt-Raipur (C.G. ) Ku. Laxmi Dhirhe D/o Sarju Prasad R/o Village- Sirve, Tahsil- Tilda, Distt- Raipur(C.G.) Smt.Shallendri ff/o Faguaram R/o Village Sinodha, Tahsil-Tilda, Distt- Raipur(C.G-) "ys^:^'.~Ws^^sssssKescs'ss 'T-) 4 TOIT PETITION UNDER AKTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) AND ALSO OTHER ORDER /DIRECTIONS(S)ETC. 1 w'" g;5Er^E!Tzn?CT, yTTl'<i<iG, Rirti'iiy .[^.•p...^..-.^.^ sn^?T^vS (^f^s) gn^sTTrf^iftP ?TSTT3n^?T(PWR iarma ^RiTSR'afeTan^ST LUA2UUi> Mr. S.S. Mishra, learned coul Mr. Arun Sao, learned Dy. the State of Ghhattisgarh. Learned counsel for the pe petitloner is qualified to be appc Grade-111 as the petitioner was interview, According to the petition got no marks in the iriterview. produced any document like marks issued by the respondents after s< contention. This is a case where the syectlon committee is an expert body and there is no allegat in procedure or non-application of well settled legal position that in done by an expert committee, this interfering with the order. In view ofthe foregoing, the <towfri4t*t *<!MAV*!'IS'-C! 'iR't'&i1' Wsrt^HSIT^ST se! for the petitioner. Sovemment Advocate for titioner submits that the inted as Shiksha Karmi expecting marks in the sr, it appears that he has The petitioner has not sheet or any other thing ilection, in support of his |on of any malafide, error selection method. It is |case of an appointment ICourt is restrained from fetition is dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge S'P/FS/2005.-2fl.,000 y/ ^'