IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43783 of 2009 1. GOPAL SHARMA @ GOPAL SINGH S/O SRI SUDESHWAR SHARMA R/O VILL.- PALI, P.S.- NAUBATPUR, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 302 and 120B of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that the informant is the chaukidar not an eye witness who does not name anybody. Counsel for the State points out that the deceased allegedly was seen the same morning with the petitioner and others on one motorcycle. Considering his defence of suspicion only, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B. K. Srivastava, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class Danapur in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 376/05. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)