AMENDED PETITION BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR §C.G.) WRIT PETITION NO. 14501 2006 PETITIONER National'Thermal Power Corpn Limited Supervisors Association, K.S.T.P.S., through its President Shri U.S. Ratre, A-1669, Kaveri Vihar, PO Jamniopaii, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. RESPONDENTS The Union of India, through — its Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block New Dehii. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, Head Office, N.T.P.C. Bhawan, Scop Complex, Lodhi Road, New Dehli, through — its Chairman — Cum — Managing Director. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, PO Vikas Bhawan, Jamnipali, Distt. Korba, through — its General Manager. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATWSGARH : BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HQN’BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. Writ Petmon No. 871 OF 2006 CORAM Present : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava. learned counsel for the petitioner. - Shri Bhishma Klnger, learned $tanding counsel for Union of lndia / respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Praveen Das and Shri Vivek Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. Shri Amit Chaudhari, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Writ Petition No. 1400 OF 2006 iETlTlONER Chemical Employees Union Gopalpur Korba (A Union Registered Under the Trade Unions Act, 1926) Through its President Pramod Shukla. S/o Shri R.K. Shukla. aged about 43 years. Occupation e Service, Working - as ‘ Officer, Technical Grade-ll, R/o S.V.B.P. Nagar, Jamni Pali, Korba (C.G.) EETITIONER Bharat Aluminium Mazdoor L/ (INTUC), Through its General w Secretary Sharma, S/o Late BR. Aged abOout 53 R/o years, No. 398, B-Type, Sector-3, Township. Korba, District : Chhattisgarh Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Secretary, Ministry of Finance. New Delhi 2, Central Board of Direct Taxes. Government of lndia, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi . 3‘ Bharat Aluminium Co. Limited, Through its Managing Director, r Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4, Chief Commissioner, lncome Tax, Chhattisgarh. Versus Union of mdia, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi Central Board of Direc‘ Taxes, Government of India. Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance. Department of Revenue, New Dem? The (.BP. Company Ltd. (A Govt. of India Enterprises), Business Group (Chemicafs), Industrial Explosive Plant; Through Its Chief Manager (K), Village — Gopalpur. Jamnipall, Korba — 495450‘ Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Chhattisgarh. Raipur (C.G.) ' 1 . Pr! awn Writ Petition N9. 1450 9F 2006 r RESPONDENTS National Thermal Power Corpn * Limited Supervisors Association. K.5.T.P.S., through its President Shri U.S. Ratre, A4669, Kaveri Vihar, PO Jamniopaii, Distt. Korba (C6,) Versus The Union of india, Through its Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block New Delhi. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited. Head. Office, N.T,P‘C. Bhawan, Scop Complex Lodhi Road, New Deihi, through ‘ its Chairman? cum-Managing Director National Thermal Power Corporation Limited, PO Vikas Bhawan, i Raioev Shrlvastava, learned counsel for the petitioner S Bhishma Kinger, learned Standing counsel for Union ol" Shri RS. Nair, iearned Sr. Advocate with Shri PS. Koshy. learned counsel for the respondent No.3. / respondents Nor i & 2. Shri Am Chaudhari, teamed counsel for respondent No.4. it RESPONDENTS pgnnONER E3hr hri india @ Jamm’paH, Déstt. Korba, through -— its General Manager. Present : Shri PS. Nair, learned Sr‘ Advocate with Shri P‘S‘ Koshy, learned counsei for the petitioner. Shrf Bhisnma Kinger, learned Standing counsel for Unlon of lndla/respondent N01. Shrl Abhlshek Sinha, learned counsel for res. Nos. 2 & 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10-1 1 ~2006) The following oral order of the Court was passed by SR. Nayak, CJ Learned counsel appearing for all the parties-would submit that the point that arises for decision in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Aum Kumar 8. Ore. Vs. Union of India & OrB.‘. in View of thoabovo joint submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties. these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the above judgment of‘ __ the Hon‘ble Supreme Court. No costs. Sd/- V.K.Shri"asm"? . Judge l. .i" sd‘l- l Chief Justice 2006(7) Supreme 607 K-rm‘“ “V