-}.^$- ./-'•::'^lrs^.."-"" ^f^^'" %tS',!fij F RERfPU Gi^Vs^i... ^Cs^^^T 'f^ '^.^•" ^- )c)zrs> 2- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) N0. f^M-/200§' WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ^*-..^- PETITIONER ^ fy€ ^',^v';^ \^0^" ^ RESPONDENTS Kailashpati Nayak, aged about 35 -O"^} years, son of Shri Kshetrapal Nayak, ^ Assistant Teacher, Government Primar/ School Chhelbhantha, Raigarh (C.G.) (sl.no. 36 of P-1) VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . 2. The Distt. Education Officer Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER HKH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR ( W. P.(S) No. 123of 2007 Petitioner ; Ja9atpal Nikunj Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh <& cnother W.P.fSyNo. 124 of 2007 Pet^tioner ; Venudhar Ijarckir Versus Respondents ; Stateof Chhatt-isgarh & another W. P.fSlNo. 125 of 2007 Petitioner Respondents Ku. Jeevon Manju Xalxo (after marrwge Smt. Jeevon Manju Viswas) Verais Respondents : State of Oihatt-isgarh & others W P.(S) No. 132 of 2007 Petitioner ; Clament Kerketta Versus State of Chhatt'isgarh <& another W.P.fSyNo. 138 of 2007 Petijt'ioner ; bilipSingh Sidar Versus Resjwndents ; Slate ofChhattisgorh & onother I: 1. ' . • W. P.fSlNo. 143 of 2007 I; : • • ' • ; • • . • ' ' • • . Petitioner : Trilochan Ncyak Versus Re^)ondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh A ano-rtier W. P.(S)No. 144 of 2007 Peti^ioner : KailadipatiNayak Versus Re^iondents : State of Chhattisgarh A another W. P.(S) No. 146 of 2007 Pett^ioner : Roop Narayan Ram Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A another ^. W. P.fSlNo. 146 of 2007 Petitioner : RdykumarPatel Versus Reis^ondents ; Stort-e of Chhatl-isgarh Aano'ther W. P.fSVNo 152 of 20)7 Petitioner : 5hyam ;Mohan Nayak i Versus Respondents ; Stateof Chhatt'isgarh A another And W. P.(S) No. 160 vf 2007 r . ' • • . '" . . • Petitioner : Narendra Singh Nuyak Versus Reqwndents : State of Chhatt-isgarh A ano-ther ^B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Shi^i A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, bepyty fiovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind \: .-. . • Dubey, Panel Lawyer, AAs. Sunita Jain/Ponel Lawyer for the h .' re^»ondents/5tate. ORDER j 0'ossed on this 17th Day of January, 2007) The follou»ingorder of the Court ispossed bySatish K. Agnihotri. J. A, Learned c^unsel oppearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that l+ie facts of the pre«htwril' petitions are simitar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh il Kumeu' Shcirma 1& ano-rtier vs. State of Chhattisgarh A others), urfiich !. i ' . . • was disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further dubmit that thequestion of lawinvolved is also the same. <. 2. In view ofi the above-stortad submissions mude by learned counsel for Ihe partieS these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order datcsd 9.10.2006 passed by this Court in W. P.(5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakedi Kumar Sharma A ano+her vs. State of Chhaf'isgarh d others). No order dis to costs. ' 3. A copy of •(his order be placed on record inconnected matters. Subhaiih sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ;'^" -^c"