IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.3251 of 2009 Date of Decision : 07.09.2009 State of Punjab and another ...Appellants Versus Bhagwan Singh ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Ms. Ambika Luthra, AAG, Punjab, for the appellants. Mr. H.K.Brinda, Advocate, for the respondent-caveator. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendants are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the learned first Appellate Court, whereby the order of recovery of the loss suffered by the State dated 22.11.2005 was set aside, as the same was found to be illegal, null and void, for the reason that the same is not a speaking order. The reasoning given by the learned first Appellate Court that how and under what circumstances the reply filed by the plaintiff has been considered not satisfactory is not discernible from the reading of the order. In view of the said fact, the finding recorded by the learned first Appellate Court that the order dated 22.11.2005 is a non-speaking order cannot be said to suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may give rise to any substantial question of law for consideration of this Court in second appeal. Dismissed. 07.09.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE