BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourteenth day of February Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.1823 of 2011 1 A.THINAKAR 2 T.JERALD BINO 3 R.NEWLIN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CR.NO.5 OF 2011. ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S. M.P.SENTHIL Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.RAJENDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C., in Crime No.5 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The Court heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged offence as stated in the complaint. 4. The case of the prosecution is that the son of the de-facto complainant studied Diploma course at Sun Polytechnic and in order to get an admission in B.E.Mechanical division, he approached the fourth accused in this case, who was working as a lecturer at Sathyam College of Engineering and Technology at Aaralvaimozhi, Kanyakumari District. It is further alleged that the fourth accused in this case brought the de-facto complainant to the said Sathyam College and the de-facto complainant had paid a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- as fees without https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ getting any receipt. Since the son of the de-facto complainant failed in the diploma course, he demanded the repayment of amount, but they refused to repay the same. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the offence alleged, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every Saturday and Sunday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. sd/- 14/02/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. M.P.SENTHIL Advocate SR.No.8613 akm/17.02.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1823 of 2011 Date :14/02/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/