IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 101 of 2008 Between: 1 Ch. Srinivasulu Reddy, S/o. Venkata Subba Reddy, R/o. Kolagatla Village, Sangam Mandal, Nellore District. 2 Vinjam Chennaiah, S/o. Vengaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 3 Davarasi Ramanamma, W/o. Ram Subba Reddy, R/o. Kolagatla Village, Sangam Mandal, Nellore District. 4 Meka Kondaiah, S/o. Ankaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 5 B. Kama Naidu, S/o. Narasaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 6 G. Veera Raghavulu, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 7 Sunkara Penchala Chowdary, S/o. Vengaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 8 Mandala Srinivasulu, S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 9 Yasangi Ramnaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 10 Madala Ramesh, S/o. Yanadaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 11 Malapati Lakshmi Kanthamma, W/o. Ravi, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 12 Madala Venkaateswarlu, S/o. Yanadaiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. 13 Gadde Venkateswarlu, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o. Vasili Village, Atmakur Mandal, Nellore District. ... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore, Nellore District. 2 The Reveue Divisional Officer, Nellore, Nellore District. 3 The Tahsildar, Atmakur Mandal, Atmakur, Nellore District. 4 The Tahsildar, Sangam Mandal, Sangam, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 2nd respondent in refusing to receive appeals filed by the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and direct the 2nd respondent to accept the appeals, consider the appeals and rectify the voters list of T.C. Segment No. 2 & 4 of Vasili Water Users Association, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard the counsel. 2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring action of respondent No.2 in refusing to receive appeals filed by the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary and direct the second respondent to accept and consider the appeals and rectify the voters list of T.C. Segment Nos.2 & 4 of Vasili Water Users Association and pass such other suitable orders. 3. It is stated that the elections were already held, but however, the results had not been declared. 4. It is made clear that the respondents are at liberty to declare the results of the elections and the petitioners are at liberty to approach appropriate election Tribunal, if the petitioners are so advised. 5. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ (P.S. NARAYANA, J) Date: February 25, 2008. BSB ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}