IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT :PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 23113 of 2008 Between: 1. Pothamrajula Leela, W/o. Manga Murthy 2. Purra Lachaiah, S/o. Parvathalu. ..... Petitioners AND 1. The Government of A.P., rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Adilabad District, Adilabad. 3. The Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District. 4. The Sub Registrar, Asifabad, Adilabad District. .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the Memo No. G/319/2006 dated. 20-1-2007 as arbitrary illegal and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondents to receive and register the documents pertaining the sale of land in Sy.No. 612/6/ /2 with an extent of Ac. 1.00 and in Sy.No. 612/8/1/1 with an extent of 0.54 cents of petitioner No.1 and in Sy.No. 612/18 with an extent of Ac. 1.16 cents and in Sy.No. 612/18/1 with an extent of Ac. 1.00 owned by Petitioner No.2 situated at Tandur Village and Mandal. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 6-11-2008 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B.H.R.Choudary, Advocate for the Petitioners and of G.P. for Revenue for the Respondents, the Court made the following ORDER: The counter affidavit filed by the Sub-Registrar, Asifabad, Adilabad District, Respondent No.4, does not meet the contentions raised by the petitioner. The counter except stating that the petitioners were informed that the assigned lands cannot be alienated and that the petitioner has not presented any document for registration, no material is placed to show that the lands in question are assigned lands. In the circumstances, the Sub-Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District, the third respondent is directed to appear before this court, on the next date of hearing, with relevant records to substantiate what is stated in the counter. Post after two weeks (25-11-2008) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration) Department, Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Adilabad District, Adilabad. 3. The Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District. (By Speed Post/RPAD) 4. The Sub Registrar, Asifabad, Adilabad District. 5. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P.Hyd (BY SPL. MESSENGER) 6. One CC to Sri B.H.R.Choudary, Advocate (OPUC) 7. One spare copy. HIGH COURT NVRJ DATED: 11-11-2008 POST AFTER TWO WEKS. (25-11-2008) ORDER WP.NO. 23113 OF 2008 DIRECTION Bsr Dt. 12-11-2008 HIGH COURT NVRJ DATED: 11-11-2008 POST AFTER TWO WEEKS. (25-11-2008) ORDER WP.NO. 23113 OF 2008 DIRECTION