IN THE HIGH COLTRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR cis-c.cci CONTEMPT PEfmON^O. 3 ^ OF 2011 Bfll t^ PETITIONER ^A ..-,3'^ '?<sy"A....--rci T^.eA"""OC ^y- yi^"' :^v Rupesh Kumar Pandey S/o Shri M.P.Pandey, aged about 39 years, Presently posted as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Berla. Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus M BSfcSg RESPONDENT Ms.'Shruti Singh D/o (Father's name not known to the petitioner), aged about 33 years, Posted and working as Chief Executive OfficerJ.ila Panchayat, Durg. Durg (CG). ^' CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE 3T.^<^\ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF ^, ^ THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1971. ^.^'^^ ^---.—.-- — ^»^»^.^.,..,.. ^ -HC-22 SII^I^ R-fidl 311^1 ^)HI':n ^IT^'ff ueepti ^ET -i)i.s)|ri«, riTlly'lio, ^CTiyy HWWI SbHiqi SW^ 1RTER ...A^...^..^.^/') fq^I' 3D^[ ^^!TW ^lfW SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Moharl 07^2-2011 Shri Shashank Thakur, couns< HearQ. Learned counsei for the petiti^ner fiied bv Ashok Kumar Chaturvedi, inlpuj: dismissed and interim order was sllso No.3668/10, the authorities are not the peiitioner. A reaaing of oraer aatea '^l/' the interim order passed in Vv.P.(S) | was Tinaiiy aismisseo. l nere is no how to deal with the petitioner "herefore, in the opinion o| respondent is made out. The petitif y ror tne pemioner. aiieges that even though the petition inlpugning the order of transfer was finaiiv vacated vide 21/1/2011 in W.P.(S) fianding over the charge of the office to thereaFter icn 'bllfi'l'iil-l Hllcif 4 fetcft <fatci< ^i'srf^PT 3T1^T Shrivastava, J. 1/2011 passed by this Court reveals that |jo.3668/10 was vacated and the petition Ipecific direction to the respondent as to thls Court, no contempt against the is accordingiy dismissed. /. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava [^ ^