IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15878 of 2011 Shrawan Kumar S/O Sri Jagarnath Prasad R/O Village- Rampur, P.S.- Rasulpur, District- Chapra (Saran) …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Circle Officer, Circle Ekma, Distt.- Chapra, Saran 3. Halka Karmchari Of Ekma, Saran 4. Sheo Kumar Devi W/O Dharma Nath Prasad R/O Village- Ekma, P.S.- Ekma, Distt.- Chapra ….. Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advcoate For the State : Md. Anisul Haque, AC top AAG IX 2 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. At the time of hearing of this application the petitioner confines his prayer only for direction to the respondent no. 2, the Circle Officer, Ekma, to dispose of his application which has been filed before him and a copy of which has been appended as Annexure 2 to this writ application. Learned counsel for the State submits that this writ application is pre-mature as the aforesaid application has been filed only on 10.08.2011 and the petitioner has not waited for the result of the case. 2 I find force in the submission made on behalf of the State. The petitioner, after filing the application as contained in Annexure 2 on 10.8.2011, has rushed to file this writ application on 14.9.2011 and the affidavit seems to have been sworn on30.8.2011 itself. In above view of the matter, this application is dismissed as being pre-mature. However, this order would not come in the way of the respondent no. 2, the Circle Officer, Ekma, in proceeding with case of the petitioner deciding the same or its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously, following all the procedures as contained in the relevant statute and after granting opportunity of hearing to all the concerned. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)