IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45282 of 2008 MOJIBUR RAHMAN @ LAL BABU ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 498A of I.P.C. and 4 of D.P. Act. The submission is of willingness for a revival of matrimonial harmony. That the complainant has filed a maintenance claim in which certain orders have been passed in her favour. However, learned counsel is not in a position to state the date of the order. Considering that the petitioner was earlier an accused in a 498A I.P.C. case filed by the present complainant which ended in a compromise, this Court is not persuaded simpliciter to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. However, if the petitioner surrenders within 8 weeks and furnishes proof of payment of the entire maintenance amount up-to-date to the complainant, the court below after verification of the same from the counsel for the complainant shall proceed to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Complaint Case No.C-867/07 (Tr.No.3617/08) failing which the application shall be deemed to have been rejected. The petitioner shall be required to be physically present when the application for anticipatory bail is moved so that in the event of rejection he shall be taken into custody there and then when his application for regular bail shall be considered in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the aforesaid developments. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )