\\\"L L " V > ‘ , \ ’ t , N * ‘ ..... ex 6%. ‘1')ll‘7/‘75‘ CF0000053448 590004.79 ‘ No. CE? I m ~ Father’s name _ V _ ‘ xiv/r“. \ I i Resid¢nce§ Ear?“ _ r 4 9/t—BA‘C‘ ‘ __: _‘ 1 ('W-wb‘pfg‘g . § . . ' ; i Sentenced to 1 __ .b : ‘ 0a w 0‘1 Qar ‘1:> i Under section: ,9, o ; L : ’ r *by v’ kw ’ W ?i 1 ; dsm< wwwa {:1} @7\<a i 7 ‘it is explained? to the prisoner that if he states he wishes to be represented be (a legal practitioner the Appelate Court will not proceed with the/base for seven days unless ‘the legal practitioner appears either. If the legal practitioner does not appear with x‘in seven days lie may not be heard at all If the prisoner states that he does not wish to x‘be representeq by legal practitioner the court may proceed at once wish the ease and wil not be obli‘ged‘to give a hea’ring’to any legal practitioner who should appear; i l Date of z :Apphcation . . for copy of Judgement *wwn ~_ ‘* _ t 4 ‘ . 2 Date of‘ which copy received %/A z? ’ z? f _ 3 Bate on yhich Appeal sent ‘l 410,; t; e ?i 5* _' ‘7 4 Whetherijthe prisoner wishes to he represented or not yeslNo/ No:‘@ ‘5? : "’W’ Name :k (i : z] Continued in § \- ' }a1'i' Qi'wiQ‘QIV/ \ Mes QT$w’7u_g* ‘1 4 «31cm w W) g9m {iota \jTJTqcdg JV r _, ' ‘“ _ No. yw§___ dated ' 72M; q 5 19 Forwarded to i, the Deputy-m H)7 é“3y w J_::z j i=1?ie‘L’g f’%’ q ”t #375? . g ‘) [Wax . w to gather which a copy of‘judgement ogm {def passed in theWW case t‘or {av g .efr‘ p [V‘nse‘fhission t; to l the hit} ,L proper Appellate Court, w‘k‘i ‘v ld? u , ; . “rewew t e i cxw‘s ewe/H 5 I K Date ofreceipt in Beput—y—Cemmissieneris%ee ié n emu” V g v Memo Date of of receipt Appeal of of record the Appeliate to accompany Court. € ' l ‘ ,. at __ ‘ I, l'Now - ' £7; > dated ML 1'97 L I Forwarded to‘the H’w— _ Bog Pia amt; $2u fem; @bwé9e {fng liai¢1W§.. f, g. j t _,‘ {an “WM-.. -._-f - ._, .. v y z t, " Date of receipt in—Lnpelia'te Court \“N;\ XI-HC-22 kémmm§%mmM § mm cA N9 ulaglf QB! ON BEwCH ‘HQI‘i ELE $HR! i. C EHABQO : HQN EL: $HRI EH RtNERk 3 Ml" w £rlma‘nai Appea $h1£. Usha'Chandrakar, learhe Shri Alok Eak$hi,‘ ieaméd‘ Qua: '9 R A L ‘J u Laghadoe, J; By this'appeai the acéused’ efjudgment 0f convmiion cmd erdeu V ‘eqined Addl£sonai Sesswns Judge k whereby the Seamed Add’tmnal ' ‘accuseélappedan: guihy far the co: ‘ ‘Coman Bax convaczed him under Se .hlm to undelgo :mpnsenment for Rife that P.W.1 Lateram todged a repcrt lTh‘e briéf caée' éfvthrev prosecution is , effect that accused Lachhuram came to his hbuse'on 18 04 93 iii the ‘ I morning at abeut 7 00 8 00 a m ad informed him that a day beiore were No: 1447 of 139’ d ccunseiZfar the appetiant for the State/re‘sp'gmdent‘ D$M E N T ; gDalh’wed en 2'92m January 2%3 /\.‘ Jpeilant haé questioneu the legahty“ fsentence itated 1’”06i95 passed by anker m eseiors Trlai No 409l1$a ;essions Judge after hcidmg the nmtssion 0f the murdet of ihis wife Jtlen 392 pf the IPC amid eente‘nced: G m m, ' la’F( P 1 }in tt‘e pelice station Naréyanpur on 18.0-433 €145.15 pm. te the ugmw i ‘ s . ' k _ ‘asjppeilané {Lactihutr‘ag‘a 'e' ' ‘ ; i F ‘f Vs. 7’. :Vaesegment V . {the State a Magma emdesihi XI-HC—ZZ XI-‘HC-ZZ 3mm ‘ CdqNQ \Ll1€t5 mmmm‘a ,3.— The homicidai nature m‘ death ‘of 8c mmwiw’ §w$aqm m $ V ‘v‘ Thé whoie case restaon the ex actuated befare P.W.4:' Laiaram, P and P‘WA Somaru Ram. §n order ' cemession themaurf has t0 ascen > pr and‘pmmpt. ‘ 'P.W.1' Laiaram hae eta‘ted that 8cm ' day: in ‘ihe mornin‘g accused went ‘: murdered his wi'?’e. and aeked' La refused. On th§eaccusedfappeEan which he went to the house of accu Bat tying tnthe parchhi‘ Thereafter 1 Ch§amru Ram Wee a’leng with earne vit Laehtturam amt saw the body ef the ae , enquiry by the ' Sarpanch, {Lorafessicn that a day before there cersumed lquer and therea‘ter the‘ He pressed the neck (throtttec’} ano repert {Ex FL“ “"he abeve evadence of Lateram Is uaxpanc‘i 0f the m [age whu has Judictet eonfesston regarding the ct: Katti Ram. & RWA. Eomaru *Rar evidence mart Bai ie net in dispute; tla judamai cenfesemn made by the W 2 Chamm Ram PW- 3 Kath Ram t0 ptace the rehance an extra jueicra! am that the eame was vetunsary, true 1ari Ba was his sister in reiatien‘ ee o hie houee arid infermed that he hae aram,to came and see her but he t again went end requested him' 0e sect anti eawthe dead body of EEornari ie tnformeci the Sag‘eanch ofthe viiiage iegers went t0 the heuse o? accueee t Semai‘i Bai tying in the parchhi‘ Gn cusedi‘apeeilant - made extra judiciai te‘he aieng with hie wife Semen Bat ihed a quarrei and during the quarrei, murdered his’wé‘te and he {edged the G cerroborated’by P.W.2 Chamm' Ram also stated that aceueed matte extra nm-ieeien 0f murder of hie wife. P.-W.3 T hae else corroborated- the abeve I [the éfee i i < t G ‘ihvithe cross‘ examination, {ha defiFnce h'as no? ‘eliicifm anything Wnich makes the eviéence ofthese witn ses unreliabie‘ or untrustWQrthy. R is estab!ished from the above eviden e that Ehe extra judicial cvhfessiori b» :hé accu$ed was vciugtary irue an prampt. This extra judicial canfessian iends carroborétion fmm the,medic i evidence of PVW.5L Dr.V.K.Jain wh'c co‘n3u‘cted the past mortem rregaort n‘ the bdcéy‘ ofl'Somari Bai and sigma due to wifocatien. The FIR was’aiso that the bad); cf thh wife 0f th accusewappeiiant wa'z found In the ouse af accused itsni‘i ant as perih’a ’ thai the cauee of death wee aephyx ' waged very promptiy Apart ir med cai Widence me dieu on ac nt of asphyma and the accueegi hau not aria ed any expianation abe i hi: aheence irem the muse as ‘ sqmmst mg the murder af his wife b 'anyohe iese riis simple expianation i5 ihat he has been faieely impiicnte r i ' in'view‘ofthe above circumstancee the ektra judiciai can‘essien made by the accused and ti e Statement oftwe wLtnesses corioborated we are o - the censideied opinaori that the tn mg of the that Court com/tetmg tt e ‘\ aecueediappeuant for committmg th murder of his wifets based on iegai e‘ttidence and there is no inhrmity c ittegaiity in the judgmehtvaf the trial Ceurt tn the resuit we do not fnd hy substance tn thia appe’atand the eame rs habte to ve diemlssed it 1s ccerdmgiy dismiesee /V/ m the crime. . Sdl— L.C. Bhadoo i _ i Judge 7‘ In,“ Sd/ Dhlrendra M‘Shra y L Judge ' s e i‘ e e f