IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45471 of 2009 1. Ram Vinod Mahto, 2. Ram Kumod Mahto, 3. Ram Govind Mahto, 4. Ram Pramod Mahto, all sons of Late Chharu Mahto, village Hariharpur Khedhi, Ps Khanpur, District Samastipur – petitioners. Vs. The State of Bihar. 2 26.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 384, 504/34 of the Penal Code. There is a case and counter case. It is said that six persons were injured on the petitioners’ side and four persons were injured on the side of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injuries were allegedly given by Farsa. However, it is said that the injuries were caused by hard and blunt substance. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The petitioners will surrender in the court below and if the court finds that the injuries are simple in nature, the bail application will be disposed of as expeditiously as possible. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)