IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2011 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 350 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1643/2011 Dated 25/01/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC -------------------------------- SHINCE P.JOSEPH, AGED 28, S/O.SEBASTIAN, THAKIDIPURATH HOUSE, MELORAM.P.O., IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.FAYAZ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT IN WPC -------------------------------- KANAKAMBARAN, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, CIVIL STATION. IDUKKI-685603. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.MANOJ THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.350 of 2011 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th March, 2011 JUDGMENT Sri.M.A.Fayaz, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the respondent-Regional Transport Authority, Idukki, has passed orders yesterday on the petitioner's application for reduction of the running time, but a copy of the order has not so far been issued to the petitioner. The learned counsel submitted that reserving liberty with the petitioner to challenge that order, if he is aggrieved thereby, in other appropriate proceedings, this contempt case may be closed. In the light of the aforesaid submission and having regard to the fact that though belatedly the respondent has complied with the direction issued by this Court in Annexure 1 judgment, I find no grounds to entertain this contempt case. It is accordingly closed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent pursuant to Annexure 1 judgment, it will be open to him to challenge the same in other appropriate proceedings. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.350 of 2011 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 30th March, 2011