IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930 LA.App..No. 32 of 2009() ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31/07/2007 IN LAR.15/2002 OF SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT -------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR K.S.I.D.C., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT AND 1ST RESPONDENT --------------- 1. JOSE, S/O CHANDY NIKATHIL PUTHEN VEEDU PALLIPPURAM 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) INDUSTRIAL GROWTH CENTRE CHERTHALA THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/01/2009 ALONG WITH L.A.A.NO.48/09, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.NOs.32 & 48 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius.C.Kuriakose, J. It is fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the appellant- requisitioning authority that enhancement at the rate granted by the reference court under the impugned judgments for identical properties acquired under the very same Section 4(1) notification has been approved not only by this court, but also by the Supreme Court. In view of the above submission, we do not find any ground to entertain these appeals. These appeals will stand dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE M.C.HARI RANI JUDGE sv. sv.