HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL No.931 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Justice B. Prakash Rao) Heard both sides and at their request the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellants are the unsuccessful writ petitioners who by way of this appeal seeks to assail the order of the learned Single Judge rejecting their relief for a writ of mandamus inter alia assailing the order passed by the Tahsidar, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District on 31.5.2008 on the ground that the appellants may avail the alternative remedy of appeal available to them under Section 90 of the A.P.(T.A.) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 before the Joint Collector concerned. Hence, the appeal. Having heard the learned counsel and having perused the material available on record, we are of the view that the appellants may avail the alternative remedy of appeal available to them under Section 90 of the A.P.(T.A.) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 before the Joint Collector concerned, where the appellants can raise the objection including sustainability of the orders. This Court would not entertain any writ under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, we do not find any merits in the appeal. The writ appeal is dismissed with a liberty to the appellants to avail alternative remedy as available to them, within a period of four weeks and on such application, the learned Joint Collector shall dispose of the same, after giving opportunity to both the parties. . ___________________________ JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO __________________________ JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO Date:1.9.2008 mrb