13.3.2009 Present: Ms. Salochna Kaundal vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A. G. for the respondents. CWP(T) No.3053/2008 (OA No.417/96) In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed that he be regularized as work charge Supervisor. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. has invited my attention to Annexure P-3, from which it is evident that the averment and contention that the petitioner had been working as Supervisor w.e.f. 1984 is not correct. The said annexure evidently shows that the petitioner started working as Supervisor, uninterruptedly only w.e.f. 1992. It is stated by Mr. Sharma that the State has formulated a Policy, whereby the services of such of those persons who have been working as Supervisor for a period of 10 years would be accorded the status of work charge Supervisor. In this view of the matter, Ms. Salochna Kaundal, Advocate submits that she does not press the present petition. The petition is disposed of with the observations that upon the petitioner’s completing 10 years service as Supervisor w.e.f. 1992, he would be granted all benefits of work charge Supervisor in terms of the Policy, if already not granted. The benefit has to be accorded in accordance with Law. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. March 13, 2009 (rana)