IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 648 of 2007 Between: The Property Association of Baptist Church (P) Ltd., Regd. Office 95, Vepery High Road, Chennai G.D.D. Diwakar R/o. Kavali, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner. 2.The Chief City Planner, The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund 3.The City Planner, Secunderabad Division, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents and their men in interfering with the construction of building in premises No. 9-1-169, situated at S.D.Road, Secunderabad pursuant to as per the permission granted vide permit No. 125/40 dt. 31-5-2006 in File No. 0991/CSC/TP-7/05 as illegal contrary to law, without jurisdiction, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct them not to interfere with the construction of building in premises No 9-1-169 situated at S.D. Road, Secunderabad as per approved plan, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court ma deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondents.: SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN The Court made the following : O R D E R : Respondents have already filed their counter-affidavit. When the matter is listed on 10.03.2008 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it was directed to be listed after two weeks as a last chance. Even on this day when the matter came up for consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The conduct of the petitioner indicates that it is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date: 11th June, 2008. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2.The Chief City Planner, The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3.The City Planner, Secunderabad Division, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. 4.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}