IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1396 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1311 OF 2007. Marutirao Sidhu Chavan ..... ...... ......Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ...... ......Respondent. Mr.Santosh Pawar, Adv. For the applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP For the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 18/12/07 PC: Heard. The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer RI for two years and pay fine of Rs.5000/-, in default to suffer RI for one month. The applicant has also been convicted for the offence punishable under sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer RI for three years, pay fine of Rs.5000/- and in default to suffer further RI for one month. The substantive sentences are to run concurrently. Learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out that the applicant was on bail during trial and even after conviction the sentence has been suspended. Perused the judgment. It is a fit case for granting bail. Learned counsel further states that the fine 1 amount has been deposited in the Court below. Hence I direct that the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail during the trial on executing fresh bail bonds. Application stands disposed of. 18.12.07 2