Crl. Misc No. M 20132 OF 2010 ****** Harvail Singh vs State of Punjab Present : Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab for the respondent. ******* Counsel for the respondent states that the inquiry by the DSP has implicated the petitioner and his father. Counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, argues that the allegations made against the petitioner are similar to those made against Hardeep Singh, Hardev Singh, Bhagwan Singh, Harpreet Singh and Ajit Singh but the said persons have been declared innocent by the police. He further argues that qua the petitioner, the only allegation is of one blow on the elbow which has resulted in a small fracture. Considering the fact that similar allegations were levelled against the persons who have been declared innocent by the police, it would be in the interest of justice to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. This petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 18, 2010. JUDGE `kk'