IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32287 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.VISWANATHAN, PARAYANKUNATH HOUSE, NENMENI AMSOM DESOM, NAMBIKOLLUY, P.O.PUTHENKUNNU, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE NENMENI GRAMA PANCHAYAT (SPECIAL GRADE), KOLIYADI, NENMENI-P.O, WAYANAD- 673592, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, THE NENMENI GRAMA PANCHAYAT (SPECIAL GRADE),KOLIYADI, NENMENI.P.O,WAYANAD-673592. SRI. P. MURALEEDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.32287 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order issued by the respondents. From Ext.P4, I find that it is only a provisional order proposing to demolish the building constructed by the petitioner on the ground that the construction has been by filling up paddy lands. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition in so far as Ext.P4 is only a provisional order and the petitioner can very well file objections and the respondents are bound to pass a final order before taking further action in the matter. However, I make it clear that after passing final order, if the same is adverse to the petitioner, the implementation of that order shall be kept in abeyance for a period of two weeks to enable the petitioner to seek appellate remedies. If the petitioner files objections within a period of one week, the same shall be considered before passing final orders. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd 2