IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23492 of 2010 ROHIT PASWAN S/O GARIB PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner was using the sim of the looted mobile from the very day of the commission of dacoity, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s bail shall not be considered if his case is bifurcated for ends of commitment or framing of charge. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )