fr-(f‘?(4O$M BEFORE TH“ HO‘B NLb M. eMNIRI ADISfAmV“ JA BALPUR 0.25.4 No. 2. 5 (é, f, /19<.a4., APFLECANT :— K.V.Iyengar s/d Late Shxi K.K.Iyengar, U.D.C. 0/0 Exacutive Engineer, E& FQ P.W.D.¢ Raipur, R/b G-313Civil Lines* Raipura VERSUS RESPONDENTS su (1‘ The $tate o£ M.P¢ through the Secnetar ’ P w‘3;3 Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. The Englneer-in-Chlef, P W D., M P‘ Bhopal. 3; The $uperinten§ing Enginger, P.W.D. {E&M) Circlew Raipur Division, Raipur& ’4; mam D.R.N1rma1 15. shri Jamaal Akhtar 6. Shri R.C.Pater1a 7. 'Shri Narottam Kashyap 8, Shri K.L.Chandrakar 9,, Shri R.S.Maenpa1 10. Shri V.N.Deewah All No. 4 to ll are Upper Division Clerks C/o O£fice of the Superinten&ing Enginee; ?ubl1c Wo; s Department* Raipur Circlei Raipur. PPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 QE_2HE ADM£§ISTRATIVE TRIBUNAB ACTa '3 {a// A ”w PETITIONER HEGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH : BILA3PUR WRIT PETiTiON (S) N0.§94 OF 2G05 K.V. Iyengar Versus The $ta:e of MP. & Others RESPONDENTS Single Bench : Hon’bie SM Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pmsent :- None for tha petitioner. 8hri N.N. Roy, PL for the State. ORD R GRAL (Passed on this 20‘ day of Qctober, 2099) The matter is calied foi' hearing twice. On bo’m occasians1 mne appears nor 3s‘any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2} ’5 In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is direeted to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘3 Judge f i .. ,. i Thakur A