IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1116 of 2008 SUMA DEVI & ORS Versus RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH & ORS ----------- 3 17.09.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, the concern of the Court below expressed in the impugned order is correct and justified both on fact as also in law. However, if the Court had any doubt with regard to the purpose and/or attaining majority of the second daughter namely, Sangeeta Kumari, it had all the reasons to seek personal appearance of all the parties and determine the nature of the requirement of the family. That being so, this Court would direct the Court below to once again reconsider the matter by directing personal appearance of all the five family members i.e. widow, son and the three daughters and after being satisfied of the need of the family, pass an appropriate order for releasing money only to the tune which will serve the immediate purpose of the family. With the aforementioned observations and directions this Civil Revision application is disposed of . Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)