1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2527/2008 Tukaram s/o Soma Kamble ...Versus... State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Sudhir Malode, Adv. for petitioner] [Shri A.M. Deshpande, AGP for respdt. Nos.1 to 4] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 01.07.2008 Heard. Learned Counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that notice of motion of no confidence recites three alleged misconducts on the part of Sarpanch alleged by the members of the Grampanchayat. According to him, however, when the meeting took place, some other alleged misconducts were sought to be agitated in the meeting of which the petitioner Sarpanch had no notice. He thus submits that there is infraction of principles of natural justice. 2 A.G.P. Shri Deshpande for State opposed the writ petition. Having heard Counsel for the petitioner and A.G.P. for State and having seen the impugned order, it is clear that there is concurrent finding of fact recorded by the authority that the motion of no confidence was correctly passed and the majority went against the petitioner. The petitioner will have to vacate the elective office since he has lost the confidence. I do not find any reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of facts. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw