1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3778/2010. (Omprakash Lodha Vs. Balasaheb Bade and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.VD Sapkal, Adv. for petitioner; *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 21 st October, 2010. ... 1) Heard learned Counsel for petitioner. 2) Respondent, in spite of service, absent. 3) An application was moved, seeking appointment of Court Commissioner to inspect the boundaries of the disputed properties below Exh.72. 4) The learned 2nd Jt.CJJD, Newasa by his order dated 1.11.2009 did not agree, the same is questioned in this writ. 5) The observations of the learned Judge in paragraph 2, giving elaborate narration as to the controversy between the parties, illustrate that the Commissioner would not be in a position to deal with the incorrect boundaries between the parties on the basis of correction deed, to which reference was given. The order of the learned Judge, 2 as is indicated in para 4 is also in tune with the legal position. 6) No interference is warranted with the order under challenge. Writ Petition lacks merits, dismissed, no costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/