AB 722/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLETHE MR. JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. P.Sharmah, learned counsel for the accused petitioner and Mr. K.Munir, learned Addl.PP appearing for the State. The case diary, as called for, has been produced. On perused of the same, it is found that the accused petitioner and informant wife had occasi onal quarrel. There is no such materials in the case dairy warranting refusal of granting anticipatory bail to the accused petitioner. Accordingly, the interim bail order dated 16.3.2011 is made absolute on the same terms and condition. It is stated that the accused petitioner has already appeared before the IO concern ed. However, he shall appear again before the IO, if required, in the interest o f investigation. The bail application stands disposed of.