IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16156 of 2010 1. Chhedi Yadav, son of Rashik Lal Yadav. 2. Rama Yadav, son of Chhedi Yadav. 3. Saukin Yadav @ Sukin Yadav, son of Chhedi Yadav. 4. Laxman Yadav, son of Chhedi Yadav. All are resident of Village Tegrah, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani. -------- Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ------- Opp. Party ----------- 6 05.10.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State as also taking into account that this case was waiting for receipt of the report of criminal antecedent as against the petitioners and that there is a report showing that not only the petitioner nos. 2 & 4 have criminal antecedent but, even petitioner no.1, about whom in paragraph no.15 of the bail application, it was categorically stated that he has got no criminal antecedent, is infact accused in Bheja P.S. Case No. 244 of 2004, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 4. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners, namely, Chhedi Yadav, Rama Yadav and Laxman Yadav respectively is rejected. Since the petitioner no.3 has got no criminal antecedent, this Court would direct for grant of bail to the petitioner no.3, namely, Saukin Yadav @ Sukin Yadav on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 75 of 2009, subject to the following 2 conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner no.3 will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner no.3 in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner no.3 is allowed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)