i? ^is^s^ 'ff. Riaini »a IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.AT - BILASPUR WRrrpETmoN rs) NO. (A^S^ OF 2009 PETITIONER ,.zia5.<-;^ ,^>';.^"^^ ^^....- 6~1. :?^I:'" BHUWAN LAL CHAURE, AGED -41 YEARS, S/0 LATE H. R. CHAURE, WORKING AS - MULTIPURPOSE HEALTH WORKER, AT - SUB - HEALTH CENTER, KARAMTARA, C.H.C.- DONGARGAON, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON (C. G.) R/0 KARAMTARA, BLOCK- DONGARGAON, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON (C. G.) A®'' VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH - ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, MANTRALAYA, D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR 2. CHIEF MEDICAL & HEALTH OFFICER, RAJNANDGAON (C. G.) 3. BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER, BLOCK - DONGARGAON, DISTRICT - RAJNANDGAON (C. G.) Writ Petition under Article - 226 of the Constitution of India. ;;1% ^il R:T'?r ^.w 3(1^1 WfSV 7^'<<l'4K'f'4, 0itiiy<l<B, fs|Cll-Hy,< ..U.£:..^....(-<.?-<; ^ S^fliW «fW '^fs^Tf^RSR SB : HON'BLE SHR1 JUSTICB [PRITINKER DIWAKER 10.08.2009 Shri R.K.Kesarwani, coui Shri Vivek Sharma, P. L. At the outset counsel foj present petition with liberty tc No.2 raising all his grievances dated 30.6.2009. He however. directed to decide the represent^tion so made expeditiously. Counsel for the State h^ the petitioner is decided by ti] with law. Accordingly, the petitioi) liberty as aforesaid. isel for the petitioner. br the State. [ the petitioner wants to withdraw the file represenfcation before respondent against the impugned transt'er order submits that the said authority be s no objection if the representation of le authority concemed in accordance is dismissed as withdrawn with the Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge BB