f^l^^l^S >^:.m^j. •fuS^Vi^ ^"f v^ . HON'I K. A&NIHOTK, J -r^r-i i %?B"BT"K°T.^i-.y- r^ s JL ^ A^s^i it (PR) No. 6662 of 2007 Sura.imai. S/o Lats Shri Musaddi Lal; <S9€-£S ^bout 87 ycsrs, OccupGtlon Cultivcrror, Throuqh his son & Hcidsr of Povsef uf Attorney 1'3'ishriC Kuffiu" \ Agrfflisal, S/o Surqjmtil; aged eteout 49 yeaFSf K/O R&n'iadhssn M^sr'g, TiSh^U <^ •'t' L?^-t iy>.p»n^an^'>^sft lf f' a, ?^.^.a 1E s'UiiU^Uiif?! l^.S?, 'SB i-B' Food Corpo"ction of India Tnrough its M'sn's9£^; ^^ ^osd, KfciJriSrjdgQ-^r^ istrict-Rajnandgson (C.G.) Principc! Seer'etary, (Revenue) Chhcttisgar'h D.K.S. BhaBian. Raipur {C.G.} (Xn ths yvrit petition and in ths impugned order ths Stata of Mcdhya Pradesh wiis erruyed as Respondent No.2 but nore the State of Chhsttisgarh has come in existsnce fi-om Nuvernber- 2000 hanee State of fAadhya Prodesh is not required to Ui'T'yye.yi us K^^us'tU'iSii'i ^ Tns Colleetor, SAJncindgcon, Oistrict nt^;^^..^-| ,.-„,-,,.- ,</• .C. \ Kii<jfiuiriu^au's'i \^^'.) 4. Boar'd of Revenue (Madhyo Prsdssh) Swa'ioi' (this res&onderit is a profor'nia respondsnt and notices are FsOT rte^Uir€3TO D®SSHT TG ITJ Wpit Appea! under Sectjon 2(U ofthaChhffttlsgcirh_High_Coyi't^DpeaLto Division8eneh_Act^2QCS6read_withRy|el57(10MBof*heH]<ah_Court_uT Chhattisqcrh Suies.2005 Preser.t ; Shri P. Diwakar. Senios- Advoccte with Shri Ashish Sui'c.i'ia, counseS for- the cppsSiant. Shri B.P. Supta, counssl for respondsnt No.l. Shri A.5. Kachhavahu, Sovemirient Advoeats for tha Stcte. Vi - 2-— (fssssd sn 26" Octeber, 2007) The foilowing oral judgment of the Court was pcssed by In view of the order datsd 13.07.2007, pcssad by this Court m not maintGjnGble. Writ Appeai (PR) No.3486/2007, this writ appec! is Accor'dingly, the writ appec! iS disrsisssd cs not maintainsble. Sd/- -•.. ActingChiefJustice subbu Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotn Judge "•^^•s!^isss) ^@ »seyG* ',-^^flr iT^ (-V- ^