j HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILA8PUR W.P.ISlNo. 6891 of 2007 PETITIONER RB8PONDENTS Uday Siagh Gautam., S/o Shri SamaUya Siagh Gautam, Age about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Priniary School, Bhatapara, Berla, District Durg (C.O.) Versus 1 State Govfc ofChhattisgarh, Throiigh : The Secrefaiy, Education & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education OfBcer, District Dui^ (C.G.) (Writ Petltion under Artide 226 of 0*e Constttutioa of Indial ABpeataace: Shri Somikaut Verma, counsel for thc petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jaiu, Panel Lawyer for fhe State on advaace copy. ORAL ORDBR (20.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Learued counsel for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner has passed B.Ed. examuiation on bis own expenses, therefore, he is entiUed to receive two advaace iacreinents according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that iu many ideutical matters, the petitions bave been aUowed in terms of the order passed ui fhe case of Yashioant Kutneir ShwadvMi Vs. Municipal Corporattpn, Eurg cmsO. another f3006 ffO JMPJR-CG 96?. He submits that fhe case of the petitioner is squarely covered by fhe said Judgment. Tbis legal position is not disputed by theleamed couasel for tiie State, However,she submits fhat fhe order inay be passed ia terms of fhe said judgment, but it shall be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such qualification. Accordnigly, this writ petition is aUowed ia terms of fhe order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bhwadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to _verificati.on of the facts as to whether fhe petitioner had ~T W.P.rSl.No.6891 of2007 acquired B.Ed. ExamiaatiQn Certificate on his own expenses as percirculars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 aud fur&cr whether he has been paid two advaace lacrements or not. The petition staads finally disposed of. No order aa to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Shyna