HK3HCOlURrOTC?NHjlUTnSGARHATBtASP<M WritPetiUonfst No. 4701 of20087 PefiUoner Versus Respondents :1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Mohd. Irfan Khan S/e. fttohd. Shahjad Khan, Aged about 40 years, R/o. Kssttal, Disbiet Bastar-<ehhattisgarh) State of ChhatUsgarh, Through: Secretary, School EtfucaBon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur District Ralpur (ChhatBsgarh) Collector, Jagdalpur, Didriet Baster (ChhatUsgarh) District Educatron Officer, Jagdalpur Disb'ict Bastar (CfthatUsgart^ Block Education Cfflcer, Keshfcaj, Jagdalpur, Distrtet Bastar (Chhattisgarh) Jagbandhu Samrath, Asst, Teacher, Janpad Panchayat, Primary Scheot, Keshkat, District Baster (C.G.) WRlTi>ETITIONUJ\l£lERARTICL^22(^27^FTHECQNST^ITVnQN<y SB: INDIA Hon'hle Justice Shri Satish K. A®nlhotri Present: Mr. Manoj Paranpape,AdTOcatBforth9petiConer. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to4/State. u Thakur ORDER (Passed on ttts 16"' day of April, 2007) 1. The peUUoner has filed thls peUfiwi ehaltenging ttie teansfer order dated 7.7.2006. By virtue of Uie interim order dated 1.9.^08, passed by this Court, the peUttoner is continuing at fte originat place of posting. 2. Be that as it may, with the passage of time thls peUtlon has become infructuous, as period of transfer is not ^plicable forever. At this point of time there is no quesfion to examine the validity of ttie transfer order. However, <he respondents are at liberfy to pass appropriat® orders, keeping in view the publie intar^t awl administrative exigency, without Insisting on compNanee of the impugned transfer order. 3. In view of ttie above, this petition stands disposedof. htoorder as tocosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge