{24-11:2001 ‘ 4 ?\ \ M l V i¢s§$wfa§e 1 ¢ ‘ ‘ \ ‘ i ‘ ¢ Shri Arun Kochar, couxisel for the appellant. shri S.C. Dutt, Sr. Aclvocate with Shri Gurudev § ’ 1 l § Sharan, counsel for the resgondent. 4 I i a? Heard. ,l‘ 3 l g A ‘ Thé cause-list shows nher namé’ of ‘the counsel i ‘ ‘ 1, wha has been elevated» ‘ i N i, Shri ‘Arun Kochar shal; submit a list of such l \ \ \ 1 " counsel who have been elevated and who are :ano more in Y ‘ a practice . v E l E t § ‘ Counsel tor the resoonbent sub;hit5 that the aCquittal i which has been passed is on the appreciation of evidence and :gthere‘ls § a limited scope £01; interference againstxthe order } jéof aCquittal. 1 . E'ven otherwise cognsei.‘ for the appellgant submits that i‘the $ :‘i, Wwwé V ‘E Havino§considered the £acts and circ‘umstances o£ the icase, the appeal iggigewwwwo JM W M2? H iém &v\&/\&Aw@ a \, '* "/ Sdl- JA/shbbu. 4 it a ‘ Fakhruddin a seem—asses l _ ;.:»mm—saum Judge \ e i ; w‘ ”K 4.9“