IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2008 / 12TH ASHADHA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 971 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.1473/2008 Dated 12/02/2008 .................... PETITIONER --------------------------- ABDUL KAREEM HAJI, S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN, AGED 53, CHERUVATT HOUSE, KUNNUMMAKKARA P.O., CHOMBALA, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE, REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, HUSSAIN HAJI, S/O.ADBURAHIMAN, AGED 50,CHATHOTH THAZHEKUNIYIL,DO. P.O., NELLACHERI AMSOM, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENT: ------------- MR.GEORGE, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF CALICUT, CALICUT. BY ADV.MR.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/07/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont. Case ( C ) No.971 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 3rd July, 2008 JUDGMENT Adv.Mr.P.V.Kunhikrishnan, Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. I am in agreement with Mr.Kunhikrishnan who submits that it is too early in terms of Annexure E judgment for initiating proceedings for contempt against the respondent. Pursuant to Annexure E, the Corporation reconsidered the plan and issued Annexure F communication to the petitioner. Of course to Annexure F the petitioner submitted Annexure G reply. It is for the Corporation to consider Annexure G and to take a decision. The Contempt Case will stand dismissed as premature. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE