THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOs.12515 and 12525 of 2006 DATED: 22.06.2006 WP.No.12515/2006 Between K.Srihari and four others. .. PETITIONERS versus The Muncipal Council, Vikarabad, represented by its Chairman, Vikarabad and another. .. RESPONDENTS WP.No.12525/2006 Between Patel Shivagan. .. PETITIONER versus The Muncipal Council, Vikarabad, represented by its Chairman, Vikarabad and another. .. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION NOs.12515 and 12525 of 2006 COMMON ORDER: Heard both the learned counsel. 2. Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents-Municipal Council, Vikarabad, would submit that in fact the appeals preferred by these writ petitioners had been entertained and however on interlocutory applications no interim orders were made and hence the Writ Petitions may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the appeals. However, Sri Vijay Kumar Herur, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that this Court while making orders in the prior writ petitions viz., WPs.11382 of 2006 and 11383 of 2006, suspended the order for a period of two weeks only, which is coming to an end by tomorrow. The learned counsel also would submit that inasmuch as it is stated by the learned Standing Counsel that the appeals have been entertained and no interim orders as such were passed, there is likelihood of demolition in the meanwhile. However, Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna, learned Standing Counsel that no such action during the pendency of the appeal may be taken, and he submits that the Writ Petitions can be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the appeals filed by the petitioners by the end of July, 2006. 3. Taking the over all facts and circumstances into consideration and also in the light of the limited orders passed in the Writ Petitions and further inasmuch as those orders are going to expire by tomorrow, status quo obtaining as on today to be maintained till the end of July, 2006 and by that time the appeals pending before the respondents to be disposed of. Both the Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs. -------------------- SSR 22.06.2006 Issue order copy tomorrow. (BO)