IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2009 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 367 of 2007 -------------------------------------- OP.NO.122/2006 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD. .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- SASIKUMAR, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.PATTU, KUNNATH VEETTIL, PARAL, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), MR.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH). RESPONDENT/COUNTER PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------------------- DHANYA, AGED 22, D/O.GANGADHARAN, KUNNANATTIL, KANAYAM, KULAPPULLY, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD). THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/12/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- Mat.Appeal No. 367 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 J U D G M E N T Basant, J. The learned counsel submit that the matter has been settled between the parties and they have resolved all their outstanding disputes. They have resumed cohabitation. In these circumstances, it is prayed that this appeal against the rejection of her claim for divorce may be dismissed as not pressed. Memo to that effect has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. We accept the request. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. R.BASANT, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn