IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M 8096 of 2009 Date of decision: 12.05.2009 Sanjay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr. Hoshiar Singh Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Navneet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** Harbans Lal, J.( Oral) This petitioner has been moved by Sanjay Kumar under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for issuance of appropriate and necessary direction to the District Magistrate, Jind – respondent No.3 to accept surety bonds as per Warrant for the Temporary Release dated 17.03.2009 (Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.1, whereby, the petitioner has been granted four weeks' parole for the admission of his child in a school. In reply, filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 3, it has been admitted that the parole was granted to the petitioner after completion of legal formalities. It is averred that the papers were thereafter sent to the answering respondent i.e. the District Magistrate, Jind – respondent No.3 for acceptance of the bail bonds / surety bonds of the petitioner, but in the meanwhile, the Model Code of Conduct for the guidance of political parties and candidates came into operation because of the coming Lok Sabha elections. It is pertinent to point out here that admittedly, the parole of four weeks' has already been granted to the petitioner by the respondents for the admission of his child in a school. CRM No. M 8096 of 2009 -2- I have heard the learned counsel for the parties, besides perusing the record with due care and circumspection. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Jind – respondent No.3 to accept the bail bonds / surety bonds as per warrant for the temporary release dated 17.03.2009 ( Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No.1 within a period of one week from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Disposed of accordingly. May 12, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge