1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.88/2009 Uttamkumar Nandlal Sinha & Anr. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Neville Deboo & Abhay Bhoir for the petitioners Mr.P.A.Pol,APP for State CORAM: Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J. DATE : 20th July,2009. P.C. . Heard. This revision application has been preferred by the accused against the order passed by the learned Asstt.Sessions Judge,on 19/1/2009 in the discharge application filed under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners/accused are prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 489-B,489-C read with section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the accused at the time of commission of offence were detained in the prison in West Bengal.There is no evidence against the petitioners showing any implication in the offence of fake currency. The evidence which is available against the petitioners/accused is restricted only to the statement of co-accused stating about the involvement of the petitioners in the said offence. 2 The learned Special P.P.has opposed this revision application and pointed out the relevant portion from the record showing the involvement of these petitioners. The petitioners are prosecuted under section section 489-B and 489-C of the Indian Penal Code alongwith the offence of conspiracy and therefore the submissions of learned counsel that the petitioners/ accused at the relevant time were detained in the prison at West Bengal cannot be accepted.In the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge he has rightly dealt with the available evidence on record which casts grave suspicion against the petitioners that they are likely to be the partners in the commission of offence. Hence I am not inclined to interfere in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. The petition stands dismissed. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.)