IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1325 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.13254/2010 Dated 07/06/2010 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------- KUNHAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.CHUNDAYIL VELU, KULUKILIAD AMSOM, KOTTAPPURAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT: --------------- SAJEESH.H.M, FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SREEKRISHNAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679 513. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. .................................................................... C.O.C. No.1325 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Government Pleader. Admittedly there is dispute between petitioner and respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.(C) No.13254/2010 in a civil court pertaining to an item of property. It is stated that civil court has passed interim orders in favour of the petitioner. Petitioner's grievance is that Police is harassing him on the request of the party respondents in the W.P.(C). However, on behalf of the respondent in the Contempt case Government Pleader submitted that there is no harassment by the respondent and once petitioner was summoned to enquire into a private complaint filed by 6th respondent in the W.P.(C). According to the respondent, petitioner has never been summoned thereafter. On behalf of the respondent, undertaking is also given by the Government Pleader that the respondent will not harass the petitioner. We record this undertaking and close the Contempt Case. As stated by the Division Bench in the 2 judgment in the W.P.(C), if petitioner is involved in any crime, then investigation is permissible by respondent or any other Police Officer. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge BHABANI PRASAD RAY Judge pms