caw427of2010.sxw 1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.427 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2952 OF 2008 Pukhraj R. Jain .. Petitioner -versus Narayan Rama Pange and ors .. Respondents. Mr. K. S. Patil, for the Petitioner. Mr. Kunal Damle and K.S.Dewal for respondent Nos 1 A to 1H. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 27 th April, 2010 P.C. 1. Learned counsel, appearing for contesting respondent Nos 1A to1H, makes a statement that they are not making any construction on the property. The status quo is granted by this Court. The contention of the petitioner is that Supreme Court has decreed the matter in favour of the petitioner when the Executing Court declared it nullity as one of the defendant expired and therefore, decree against a dead person declared to be null and void. The facet that other two parties were also there and the suit was for declaration of ownership of property in question between the parties and as writ petition is pending against the order passed, caw427of2010.sxw 2 it is desirable to direct the parties to maintain status quo of the property. However, in view of above statement made by the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos l & 2 on instructions, present application is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)