THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.760 OF 2009 Date: 29.1.2010 Between: K. Sudhakar ..... Appellants AND M.A. Hameed and others. ...Respondents THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.760 OF 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge, dated 24.1.2008, made in Writ Petition No.987 of 2008, the appellant, who is a third party, filed the present appeal by obtaining leave of the Court. Assailing the inaction of the 7th respondent in not promoting them as Managers, the unofficial respondents 2,3,4/writ petitioners filed the aforementioned Writ Petition before the learned single judge. Through the order impugned in this appeal, the learned single judge disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the President Medak District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., to dispose of the representations purported to have been made by the unofficial respondents on 4.10.2007 and 11.10.2007 and pass appropriate orders as per law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order and communicate the same to the unofficial respondents. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the unofficial respondents have filed the aforementioned writ petition before the learned single judge without making him as a party to the writ proceedings and obtained the impugned order behind his back. He further contends that since the learned single judge passed the impugned order without giving an opportunity of hearing to him, the appeal be allowed and the impugned order be set aside. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Sanga Reddy, Medak has stated that the appellant herein has filed a writ petition, being W.P. No. 22715 of 2009 before a learned single judge of this Court seeking to declare the action of the respondent-bank in denying promotion to him as Assistant General Manager as per the seniority list dated 5.3.2007 and in promoting the unofficial respondents, who are juniors to him as arbitrary and illegal. He further stated that through order dated 23.12.2009 disposed of the said writ petition permitting the appellant as well as the unofficial respondents to make their objections with regard to their respective seniority in the cadre of the Assistant Managers within a period of four weeks and on such objections being filed, the authorities were directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders after hearing all the parties concerned, in accordance with law. Learned counsel states that in pursuance of the aforesaid order of the learned single judge, the bank is yet to commence the process and the bank will consider the matter as per the directions issued by the learned single judge. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned Standing Counsel and in view of the order of the learned single judge in Writ Petition No. 22715 of 2009, we dispose of the writ appeal with a direction to the appellant to file their objections, if not already done and on such objections being filed, the authorities are directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders as per law. The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 29th January, 2010 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb