•^iy^^SSS\ ISF IBB HISH ,C®®E3>©r.CHB^'EISea.aSHSE BIIiSSB'BS ^SI'£.,'SSXlsie i'8@7; /2®01 Sta'fc. Manju Venaa' ' 'W/a. Shri ladra ©eyVenBa, AgeS'aboat 30 years,,,' gEeslderife ef ^aEsoa 'paaehaya-b Eesa.aen't ef"labaa.I-galari Biat ; Baipur(gtat'»atetisgarb) VBKSSS P83?ITIQSEB 1) 25 Sfcate Qf; Ctihatti. sgarb' •3'Broagfe^*et»S^SeGret;aEy j]PaneS:Sya<E':'&;:IC3:r'aBii'B.'yiteas B.'K.- Btiiawan^ Bai'par .Ttie eel.leeter, Baipar RESPOHBENTS ..„.,....^t^ -,^^-5fc^ 'F-F" ^A.W5"1'""^ su»t(18 iji5..l'fe" 3), Ttie etiief Execu.tlve ©fficerv(ci^ :.....•—/'T''° • a'aBpa^'.SaiaistiaTat-E'alari : daw°1' '! • la.stEiGt-galpur. ~ . , • K^% -ESSISZaB UBEEK SRa'IGSES 226-& 227 QS 'SSE COSaSISWtQV ss'tWtA.:. • ^ !' ! .Y': ' . • ••;::''i.. :is'.- h@ nfe'fcI'-fc'trtnctr si^rwcs n-im»^ tv^. ti^^t^. •a "SM a :^t^ ll'ri-":^ '^ iJaHS-, •aKilsKiQSi /^ XI-HC-22 3II^[^I h-u* sn^r sti^ ^l^fl i • ^' 'S^ '•qPTRPI, eifll^'16, (»KV1I<-!1< k^;.N"s>;.^2:rci 111WI sh*sish 200 311^1 ?(giw(rtw 15/3/2002 Shri R.S. Jaiswal for fhb Dr.N.K. Shulda, AddU Gautam. Bhaduri, Govt.Advoctite Shri P.P. Sahu for petitioner, Advocate Gcncral, wifh Shri ctite, for fhc State. no,3. resp^uidcnt Stui Awadh Tripathi foi| fhe intervener Asharam. Heard on I.A.No.507/2<|)02. The application is allontcd. Intervener is permitted to interwene in the petition. Also heard finatfy. / Leamcd counsel for when the decision of motion { there was no niaterial befok-e under rute 3(3) of fhe M.P. ke Sarpanch Tatha Up Tafha Zfla Panchayat ke kc Virudh Avishw^ Prastav).| persons werc takcn by Sbx^ cbWtrt^'f W^vS 4 fslA <I»lt«;l< ^; aifigiT an^r ttoe petitioner subuiits that t»fno confidence was taken, the CoDector to satisfy I}aachayat (Gram Paachayat i, Janpad Panchayat Tafha Vice President Saijpanch, Pretident It is ateo submitted fhat 19 CIiaadrakar, M.L.A., and [^ft^^fe^ XI-HC-22 SH^F^I '^:i1?T3I!^T SirHS^ W^O ^. T^ ^l'tlM'il, ri-dl+1'ld, i«cll«1'!- w (r%w*> ES^;^^ -^ 200 snt^r'^n%r ^rf?<T - z- Shn Bhardwaj, M.L.A., and ^hey voting and the petitioner had| On the othcr hand,| respondents subnuts that| satisfection takcn tfac dccisii|>n of no confidence inotion. ^iey all voted on the date of |opposed. lcamcd counsel for thc fhc CoUector aftcr due It is submitted fhat fhe satis ineetu^; ^fae 19 persons votei^ and it is stated fhat 5 dad confidence. The petitioner ineeting. Minutes have been / So far as fhc detentfola only twp persons namely have filed aEBdavits dated ]j0/7/2001 and 7/10/2001 respectivcly and fhey have vojted ^ainst the motion of no petitioner. It is therefore confidcncc in &VOTIT of the] -yfw^ apparent that/these persoi^s detention had no e&ctQ^ ^t<il<n<iii *ii^(¥«'^^s^i^-^K ^aiPOTsn^r action is/apparent as in fhe ^ ** in favour ofno confidence ^ersons voted against no also pardcipated in the ^ufy recoidedTV&k\e<^W^ A of pcrsons is concemed, Bai and Madanlal Sahu ^ WlW.1 -^ Bataa were/det^ined but the ^ ^ [^ ^fa^ XI-HC-22 sn^iqii f^iwsnlsi ^w^ ^vi SS-taiHtj' ?S? -ilWlct-SI, 8t^l'y'l<», RtWIUy WWtl »*<l°b^J^'^l^ "M 3T[^i's^tiwHfe?r -? — Be that as it may, so ^u- conceined, fhe aforesaid MLAs party rcspondents. Having considcred fh<| aad inaterial avaUabte on recbrdf&ad in view of fhc fact that no coiifidence inotion ^ar as the present iiiatter is have hot been joiaed as facts aud circyinstanccs majorily of 19 votes, in the for Interference under Article India is madc out The petition &Us and is ^Fl^id'41^ tTR^f^ fs^ <FI|^K ifrSlpOTSII^T has been passed in the o^inion ofthis Coiirt, no case 226 of fhe Coastitution of dismisscd. L—— -A-_ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [•tft^^fwt