:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.457 OF 2005 IN WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.246 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Glaxo India Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.P.J. Pardiwala with Amit Surve i/by M & M Legal Ventures for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 30TH JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) :2: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.246 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Glaxo India Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.P.J. Pardiwala with Amit Surve i/by M & M Legal Ventures for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 30TH JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. This is a appeal in respect of the assessment year 1998-99. By an order dated 19.2.2004 the appeal preferred by the revenue for the assessment year 1998-99 and 1999-2000 were dismissed. The learned counsel for the revenue points out that in respect of the assessment year 1993-94 in respect of the very question he has preferred reference in this court bearing No.23 of 2000. That reference was rejected by this court on 23.5.2000. Considering that, in our opinion the question as raised would not arise and consequently the appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)