^ subbu DtViSlOiN CORAM: HOH'SLE SHRi JAGDJSH BHALLA, Ag.CJ. HON'BLE SHPJ SATISH K. AGNIHOTPJ, J. WntPetitJon!PILiNo,6863Qf200?' In trte matter of District Bar Association, Jagdalpur Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others Office reference Present: Shri WS Murthy, Deputy Advocate Generai with Sh" Sumesh Bajal, Govemment Advocate for the State. (Passed on 17s" October, 2007) The' foitowing oral order of the Court was passed by Hon'ble jagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. This is a ietter petition regarding non-production of the accused in Judicial custody before learned Sessions Judge for trial. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that jn reply to the tetter dated 23'*' June, 2007 of the Registry of this Court, the Superiniendent of Police, Bastar at Jagdalpur has already submitted his response. He further submte that new procedure has been adopted and there is a provision of video conferencing as weil. Acoordingiy, no interference is warranted in this matter. In the iight ofthe above, the writ petition stancfs disposed of. Sd/- ActingChiefJustice Sd/- Saush K.Agnihotri Judge