1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 1.P.Rama Moorthy 2.P.Nagammal 3.V.Valarmathi ... Petitioners / Accused 1-3 Vs. 1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Bodinayakkanur. 2.R.Saranya ... Respondents / Complainants PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the charge sheet in C.C.No.145 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Uthamapalayam, quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Anbarasu For R-1 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) O R D E R This petition is filed to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.145 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are A1 to A3 and the first petitioner is the husband and the second petitioner is the mother of the first petitioner and the 3rd petitioner is the sister of the first petitioner and there was no allegation of ill treatment and the articles, which were presented, were also returned to the defacto complainant and the 3rd petitioner is living away and she has also been implicated and no allegation has been made against the petitioners. 3. I have gone through the charge sheet, wherein, it has been stated that the first petitioner, at the instigation of the petitioners 2 and 3, did not treat his wife as the member of the family and prevented the defacto complainant from using the articles given at the time of marriage and they also pushed away the wife from the house on 15.12.2010. Even during police enquiry, they have not returned the articles given to the defacto complainant and the defacto complainant was ill-treated and she was not provided with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 food and therefore, a case was registered and charge sheet was also filed for the offence under Section 498(A) I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act. 4. Considering the allegations made in the charge sheet, I do not find any merits in the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the primafacie case has been made out in the charge sheet and hence, the charge sheet is not liable to be quashed. 5. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam 2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Bodinayakkanur. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7758 of 2011 and MP(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 28.06.2011 vsm SMA/18.7.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/