THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO C.R.P.No.2740 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner in this Revision is the defendant / landlord in the suit O.S.No.287 of 2010, which was instituted by the respondent. The said suit was dismissed for default on 30-11-2010. The very next day, i.e., on 01-12-2010, the respondent has moved an application for restoration of the said suit. The said I.A. was ordered on 03-12-2010 and the suit was, accordingly, restored to file. However, it seems that the petitioner herein has got the respondent evicted immediately on the suit, O.S.No.287 of 2010, being dismissed, though for default on 30-11-2010. In view of this hasty action of the petitioner herein, the respondent has filed I.A.No.1189 of 2010 seeking restoration of his possession. The said I.A. was allowed on 23-12-2010 directing the petitioner herein to restore the possession of the premises in question to the respondent herein. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner herein has carried the matter by way of Appeal in C.M.A.No.37 of 2010. That was dismissed, upon contest, by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Judge – cum – Additional District Judge, Family Court, Khammam, on 28-06-2011. Against this order, the present Revision has been preferred. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several contentions, but however, when his attention has been pointedly drawn to the fact that the respondent herein has moved the Court immediately on the very next working day for restoration of the premises, which was also ordered on 03-12-2010, he would submit that without going any further into the merits or otherwise of the case, the petitioner herein be granted time till 15-11-2011 to file a memo into the Trial Court, namely, Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court at Khammam, along with a set of keys of the premises in question, so that the Court will be able to restore the possession to the respondent herein. This arrangement, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner herein, would protect the interests of both parties and it will also help the Court to regulate the post-decision aspects of the suit. Accepting the suggestion of the learned counsel for the petitioner, I consider it appropriate to grant liberty to the petitioner herein to deposit the keys of the premises in question along with a memo before the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court at Khammam, on or before 15-11-2011. Upon such deposit being made of the keys, the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court at Khammam, is at liberty to deliver the keys as a symbolic restoration of the possession of the respondent herein. It is open to the Court to handover the keys either to the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff therebefore or to the plaintiff himself, depending upon the convenience and suitability. Either the counsel for the plaintiff or the plaintiff shall acknowledge the receipt of the keys to the Court. The petitioner herein shall not thereafter object the respondent entering quietly upon the premises in question and continue to stay put in possession of the same, till an appropriate decision is taken in the matter, namely, O.S.No.287 of 2010, by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court at Khammam. It is needless for me to observe that this arrangement is made without prejudice to the rights of the respective parties in the Revision. With this, the Revision stands disposed of, but however, without costs. --------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 29th October 2011