Govt. Appeal (SJ) No. 20 OF 1995 In the matter of an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ************ The Sate of Bihar ……(Appellant) Versus 1. Ram Lakhan Singh, S/o Sri Naujadi Singh. 2. Daroga Singh, S/o Sri Dharam Mahto. 3. Jagdish Singh, S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh. All R/o Village-Pipradih @ Surfudinpur, Police Station-Gurua, District-Gaya. ……………(Respondent) With Cr. Rev. No. 6 of 1995 In the matter of an application under Sections 397 and 401 of the code of Criminal Procedure. ************ Pramod Kumar, S/o Shri Baldeo Prasad, Resident of Village-Pipradih @ Safurudinpur, P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. --------Petitiioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Ram Lakhan Singh, S/o Shri Naujadi Singh. 3. Daroga Singh, S/o Dharam Mahto. 4. Jagdish Singh, S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh. All R/o Village Pipradih @ Surfudinpur, P.S.-Gurua, District-Gaya. ------Opposite Parties. ************* For the Appellants : Mr. Binod Bihari Singh, APP. ************** P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J. 1. The appeal and revision have been filed for the acquittal of respondents of the offence under Section 395 IPC by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in S.Tr. No. 7/93/296/88. 2. On going through the judgment of acquittal and the evidence on record, I find that the acquittal was recorded for very good reasons and no 2 reasonable person would possibly be aggrieved with the considerations of the Trial Court. 3. In view of such, the appeal and Cr. Rev. are dismissed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna, Dated, the 5th May, 2011. NAFR/Vikash/-