IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12869 of 2008 Between: 1 Oduru Dinamani, W/o. Bikshulu Reddy, Hindu, R/o. Tada Kandrika, Tada Mandal, Nellore District 2 Oduru Seshagiri, S/o. late Bikshulu Reddy, Hindu, R/o. Tada Kandrika, Tada Mandal, Nellore District C/o. Dr. A. Govinda Reddy, Opp: Hotel Sudhama Hot Foods, Saraswathinagar, Maguntala Lay out, Nellore. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore, Nellore District. 2 The Sub Collector Cum Land Acquisition Officer, Gudur, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondents in causing Re-determination U/s 28-A of L.A. Act with regard to the compensation payable to the petitioners basing upon the award (Judgment and Decree) dated 24-03-2006 passed in L.A.O.P.No. 49/2001 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge Court Gudur and causing enhancement of the amounts from Rs.61,000/- to a reasonable amount with regard to land in A. 0.29 1/2 cents situated in S.No. 99/7 of Tada Kandrika Village, Nellore District belongs to the Petitioners is highly illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, irrational, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and also offending article 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondents to pass appropriate orders Under Section 28-A of the LA Act and pay the enhanced amount to the Petitioners forthwith such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.PHALGUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 12869 of 2008 O R D E R: The petitioners herein made an application on 21-06-2006 under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for re-determination of compensation on the basis of the award dated 24- 03-2006 in L.A.O.P.No.49 of 2001. This writ petition is filed alleging that the respondents failed to consider the said representation of the petitioners and no orders have been passed so far. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion as to the entitlement of the petitioners for re-determination of the compensation as claimed, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioners dated 21- 06-2006 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 20-06-2008 KLP