IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO,. 285 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO,. 285 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO,. 285 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 485 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 485 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 485 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra ....... Applicant. versus Ashok Baban Mhatre & ors ..... Respondents. ..... Mrs. U.V.Kejariwal APP for State Shri C.G.Gavnekar for Respondents 1 to 3. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 19TH APRIL, 19TH APRIL, 19TH APRIL, 2005 2005 2005 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Civil Application for condonation of delay allowed for reasons mentioned therein. Civil Application 1397/05 is directed against the order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Judge. The incident occured on the day of Ganesh Visarjan when score of people were there in the procession where bursting of crackers gave rise to a dispute, which resulted in some injury and consequently all the accused persons having been acquitted under section 323 and 324 of IPC. 2. The State has now come up in appeal of the acquittal of the accused on the ground of bursting of crackers and the violation at the place was with the intention of committing murder of someone. That having not been established, the acquittal is ordered. In such state of affairs, we see no reason to interfere. Application for leave rejected. For the same reason the application for enhancement is also rejected. ....