l''ii! :.>'.S -IH'.:''. '•S: s?'";'fea ! j~*SS•2\ ysujjdgggtii^ HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Beach: Hoa'ble 8hri Satisli K. Agaihotri, J. WRIT PBTITION N0. 22S4 OF 2003 Petitioner Kishan Lal Salain, S/o Rajwa Ram, aged about 35 years, occupation- Chowkidar, R/o Village-Bharritola, Post Ofifice-Dokla, Tah.- Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Versus Respondents :1. The State of Chhattisgarh, tfarough Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Additional Secretaiy, Higher Education Techiucal Education, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Principal, Govt. CoUege Charama, Distt. Kauker (C.G.). 4. Rupsiagh Baghel, Chowkidar, Govt. CoUege Bhaaupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.). Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3/State. None for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (3rd January, 2006) Heard. 1. This court, by order dated 25.8.2003, directed the respondents to pemut the petitioner to continue at Govertument College Charama, District Kaaker, if fhe p" 44 teMNe*sg3»*?s®s f::!\ • . Bablu petitioner was not already relieved. It is iaformed that the peUtioner was already relieved on 15.7.2003 before fh.e order dated 25.8.2003 was passed by this court. More ttiau two years have been passed, hence at this stage, it is not justified to iaterfere with the traasfer order on any ground. It is &r the einployer to post au employee at a particular place keeping in view administrative exigency and pubUc interest. The respondents/State may take any decision for posting the petitioner at any place iu the public iaterest. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits fhat the petitioner be graated liberty to inake a representation before the competent aufhority to consider his case sympafhetically for postmg at appropriate place convenient to fhe petitioner. The petitioner is granted liberty to inake a representation, if aay. In fhe event,a representation is inade by the petitioner, fhe authorities inay consider the saine wifhia a period of six weeks SXIVEL fhe date of receipt of fhe representation of the petitioner. 3. For the rcasons stated above, the petition is disposed of. No orderas to costs. __.---- - —- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge