a o/o 04.04.20tt A-31 Present: Mr Surinder Anand, Advocate, for the Appellant. CM Nos.5749/2O1-1 (exemption) & 69O7/2OLL (exemption fom filinq Certified Copv) in FAO(OS) L49-t52l20tt , In the former Application it is not even stated that Certified Copies have been applied. This has now been done in paragraph 3 of the latter Application. . The Applications are allowed provided the Certified Copies are filed within the period of Limitation. + FAO(OS) 1-49-1-5212OLL & CMs 575O/201-L (delav) & 69061201L t< A perusal of the Order XLVII Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, L90B makes it clear that the impugned Order is not Appealable. By means of IA No.1,4877/20L0 filed under Section L5L CPC the Appellant had asked for recalling of the Orders dated 19.8.2010 passed in IA No.135912008. In response to our query as to whether the Appeal is maintainable, learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the Application was for rectification/modification of the Order and not for its Review. In sum and substance, the Application was for review of the Order dated 19.8.20L0. Page L of2 e FAO(OS) 749-152/2071 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified , The Appeal is dismissed on this ground. AII pending Applications also stand disposed of accordingly. VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. SIDDTIARTH MRIDUL, J. April O4,2OLL nt FAO(OS) 149-152/2011 Pagre 2 of 2 t