IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4369 of 2010 BABU LAL YADAV & ANR. Versus RAM VIJAY YADAV ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shanti Pratap, Advocate For Opposite Party No. 1 :Mr. Abinash Kumar, Advocate ----- 3 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party no. 1. I.A. No. 2104 of 2011 has been filed for condoning the delay of twelve days in preferring this application. For the reasons mentioned in the aforesaid interlocutory application, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner was prevented from sufficient cause from preferring this petition within time. As a result, this interlocutory application is allowed and the delay in filing this application is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider M.J.C. No. 4369 of 2010 on its own merit. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 284 of 2008, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 27.8.2010. 2 On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the petitioners, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No. 284/2008 is restored to its original file and number. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)