€F(^^ ® IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR rc.G.) WRTT PETTTION fS) N0. (^eLt (f OF 2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS t ^r ,^. /M/ ^^ K'QV' £y\/ /f^s^ ''^iy/ 7^y ^ J^/ / ^ ^' Surit Ram Dhairya Son of Shri K. Mohan Ram, aged about 53 years, Working as Upper Division Teacher, Resident of Village and Post Masaniyakala, Tahsil Sakti, Distrjct JanJgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Schoot Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). "he Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalanalaya, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3.r The Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 4. rThe District Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 5. ^ The Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Boys, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ^' ! 6. Kapll Nath Rathore, Upper Divlsion Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School • (Girls), Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). H^l \^ WRD' PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (Sl No. 5644 of 2009 Petitioaer Surit Ram Dhauya Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and ofhers (Writ Petition underArdcIe 226 ofthe Constitutipn oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri J.) SbriV. K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Yashwarit Siagh ThakiM-, Deputy Advocate General vrath Shri A. V. Shritlhar, Paael Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDiERfOrall (Passed on tfais 10th dayofDecember, 2009) Heard. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of iu view of the order dated 12th Noveiuber, 2009, passed by fhis Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 4315 of 2009 (Smt. Jitender Lamba Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and otherconnected matters. Learaed counsel appearmg for fhe respondents/State has not objection. However, he submits that the petitioner may be permitted to luake a representation wtiich may be considered and decided by fhe concemed aufhority ia accordauce with law, in view of the order dated 12th November, 2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 4315/2009 (supia). In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearmg for fhe petitioner, nothiug survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, this writ petitiou stands disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to inake a representation, as afore-stated, to the conceraed ayfhority, wifhin. a period of one week fixiin today. If the represeiitation is made by the petitioner within a period of one week fi-oni today, he shaU be atbwed to continue on his present place of postmg, fill the disposal of tus representation. No order asto costs. Tbafcur SdA | Satish K. Agnihotri ,Judge