Orde!s i4.No. Date .., .. 1.23 %06.03.2006 Present: Mr. Yogesh Cha.ndna., Adv. for petitioner Mr. Roopesh Kanwar, Adv. for MCD +WP(C) No. 15802-34/2004 * GrIevance of the petitioners is that they are being removed by the Slum and JJ Wing. MCD. Further grievance is that while removing the petitioners, alternative plots for relocation are not being allocated. Counter filed by Slum and JJ Wing. MCD is to the effect that removal is being effected pursuant to the orders da.ted 20,10.2003 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WP[C) No. 2112/2002. Decision /being reported as 2003 11111 AD (Delhi) 508, WazirnurBartan Nimiata Sanah Vs. UOI & Ors.. Division Bench has stipulated a. cut off date being 31.3.1990. Division Bench has held that all those who have occupied public sites in Delhi are not entitled to an alternative plot when they are removed from the public site illegally occupied Since MCD is taking action pursuant to the directions of the Division Bench and Division Bench has already opined on the WP(c) No. 15802-34/2004 Pg. 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signing Date:21.08.2023 12:03 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified No. I Date Orders issue of entitlement of an alternative plot, 1 am not required to render any further adiudication in the present writ petition. 5. Notice ofrule nisi is accordingly discharged holding that removal action by MCD would be in conformity with the directions 'issued by the Division Bench in WP(C) NO. 2112/2002. March 06, 2006 PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. dk o WP(C) Wo. 15802-3412004 Pg. 2 of 2