1 3144.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3144 OF 2010 Dilip Mahipat Padwal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for Respondent/State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED:- NOVEMBER 19, 2010. P.C. 1. This Petition is filed through jail. It takes exception to the order passed by the Appropriate Authority rejecting the request of the Petitioner to release him on parole. That order is an appellable order. In the circumstances, this Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to pursue his remedy of Appeal before the State Government. 2. Learned A.P.P., in all fairness, submits that even if the Appeal is presented beyond limitation, the same will be entertained on merits and will not be rejected on the count of delay. In the light of such fair stand taken, 2 3144.10.sxw we dispose of this Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to take recourse to remedy as may be available. 3. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Petitioner who is in jail. (A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)