IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7891 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 04-05-2011 Luxmi Verma ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Mani Ram Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The prayer made is that there should be a parity of age of superannuation in so far as private aided colleges and Government colleges are concerned. On due consideration of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that the controversy is no longer res integra as in case titled as H.L.Sahni, Principal and others versus State of Haryana and another reported as 2001(2) RSJ 291 it has been held that the age of retirement is the condition of service and other rules which are framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Once retirement age has been fixed merely because in other organisation the retirement age is fixed to be at variance with the organisation where the incumbent is working is no ground to claim parity or discrimination under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the instant petition being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. May 4 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge