CWP No.7862 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.7862 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.05.2011 **** Sawarnjeet Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Ms. Maninder, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. On the asking, Mr. JS Puri, learned Addl. AG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the nature of order which I propose to pass there is no necessity to call upon the respondent(s) to file their reply(ies)/affidavit(s), at this stage. (2). The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in withdrawing the benefit of three increments granted to her on her possessing the qualification of Giani. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondents not to recover the benefit already granted to her. CWP No.7862 of 2011.doc - 2 – (3). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present petition be disposed of in terms of the directions issued in CWP No.16323 of 2008 (Smt. Sudarshana Devi & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.) decided on 02.03.2010 and CWP No.8701 of 2009 (Dalbir Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.) decided on 08.03.2010 (Annexures P12 & P13). (4). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the directions issued in Smt. Sudarshana Devi & Dalbir Singh’s cases (supra) (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 04.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge