-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2008 APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2008 Mr. Subhash Gunda Mali. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATE DATE DATE : 01ST AUGUST, 2008. : 01ST AUGUST, 2008. : 01ST AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard learned Counsel for th Accused/Appellant. 2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 29th February 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay in Special Case No.1 of 2003 for the offence punishable under Section 7, 13(1) (d) r/w. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Applicant/Appellant has preferred appeal before this Court. 3. The Appeal is admitted on 23rd April 2008. The Appellant/Accused was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-. The learned Special Judge has released -:2:- the Accused on bail on his application. The application made before this Court for bail was also allowed. 4. In the above set of facts, the execution of sentence requires to be suspended, and since the appeal is admitted, the execution of sentence is suspended by virtue of provisions of Section 389 of Cr.P.C. 5. Application is allowed. (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)