1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.32/2009 IN SANO.687/2008 WITH CANO. 688/2008 (Abdul Bashir s/o Abdul Gani Vs. Mohd. Abdul Salim s/o Mohd. Ismail) WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO.33/2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.688/2008 WITH CA NO.687/2008 (Abdul Bashir s/o Abdul Gani Vs. Mohd. Abdul Salim s/o Mohd. Ismail) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.NK Kakade, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner; Mr.UB Bilolikar, Advocate for Respondent. ________ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 30 th March, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.Kakde for the review petitioner and Mr.Bilolikar for sole respondent in the applications and appeals. 2) The concurrent findings against the appellant made him to prefer the Second Appeal, however, lost in the Second Appeal. On reading the judgment, basically nothing could be projected to feel that there is any error or there is any requirement by the subsequent changes or circumstances to review the order under challenge. The delay also needs to be condoned. The order dismissing the Second Appeal does not require any review though delay is 2 condoned both the review petitions/applications are dismissed. 3) However, review petitioner - Abdul Bashir s/o Abdul Gani shall remove himself from the suit premises with all his belongings up to 31st August, 2010. An undertaking to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) to be given by him within fifteen days from today to vacate the premises within stipulated time, i.e. by 31st August, 2010; not to encumber; not to create third party interest; not to part with possession; not to create any other hindrance. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/RA32.09