IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26320 of 2005 DATED:6.4.2006 Between: D.Prabhakar petitioner And The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda and another Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 23620 of 2005 ORAL ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not granting special grade/stagnation increment to the petitioner on completion of 12 years of total service in all regions. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 1861 of 2005 dated 7.10.2005. Learned counsel for petitioner admitted the same. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent corporation. The relevant portion of Judgment of this Court in W.A. No. 1861 of 2005 dated 7.10.2005 reads as under; “….as per the settlement arrived at, under Sction 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 between the employees union and the management, a circular has been issued vide PD-30/2005 dated 4.6.2005 wherein it is stated that the employees, who were denied their special grade on account of their transfer from one region to another, on request on loss of seniority, would be allowed special grades on completion of 12 years of service in the same category and their pay would be fixed notionally from the date of their eligibility and the monetary benefit consequent on fixation should be paid with effect from 1.4.2005. He submits that having regard to the said Circular, the direction issued by the learned single judge is not sustainable. Considering the submissions made on behalf of both the parties and also in view of the Circular already issued by the appellants-corporation as aforesaid, it is needless to mention that the respondent also would be entitled to be treated on the same lines as contemplated there under, by making necessary payments with effect from 01.04.2005 and fixing the scale notionally from the date of his eligibility. Subject to above observation, the writ appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.” The issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of the Division Bench in W.A. No. 1861 of 2005. Hence, following the above judgment, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to fix the scale of the petitioner notionally from the date of his eligibility and to make necessary payments w.e.f. 01.04.2005 in terms of Circular PD-30/2005 dated 04.06.2005. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 6-4-2006 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26320 of 2005 DATED:6.4.2006