-Acl f^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT B I LAS PUR WRIT PETITION NO.^T l^ OF 2004 PETITIONERS: '^ ^^ ^^\ v'^^"' 7xy-4- ..-w ..<^..7 ^/y •<y vs RESPONDENTS ^ 1. Jagdish Tytler, President of Indian Judo Federation, Room No. 1134 A.B., Gate No.27, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary, Indian Judo Federation, Room No. 1134 A.B., Gate No.27, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3. Balbir Juneja, President of Chhattisgarh State Judo Association, Behind Hotel Giriraj, Jail Road, Raipur. 4. Arun Dwivedi, Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Judo Association, Rid-sid Parisar, Jalebi Chowk, Camp-1, Bhilai-1, Link Road, District Durg. FI. Chhattisgarh State Judo Association Through the Secretary Shri Om ji Gupta, Office: 37/222 "Umang", Chottapara Road, District Raipur. Omprakash Pujari, President Chhattishgarh State Judo Association Office & Residence "Center Point" Saddani Chowk, Sadar Bazar, District Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 CB 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDJA FQR ISSUAJdCE QF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION (S) / ORDER(S) IN THE NATURE OF WRIT. .^1^-..-..- XI-HC-22 ^Tc^;;wrr^T, u>TTI<<-i<i6, Rirtwy< ^T^cH W^....TpS ^r^sr 'G< ^F[ 200 3TT^^Tc?TF f^rfciT3T?^^T ^RTc^^-lRcS 128.4.2005 OT^^T ^PTT^R ^rft^T Shri B.P. Sharaaa, coimsel Shri Jitendra Nande, couni Heaid. unctjer By this petition ffled India, the petitioners challenged |P/1) passed by the 8th Additiona^ [3/2004 decided on 13& July, jpetitioners agamst the oider paipur, on 20-2-2004 (Annexure-j py rcspondents, granting mjun^ ^ejected. Brief facts of fhe case ^longwith an application under pivfl Procedure for injunction res ^ut any activities in relation tc^ plihattisgarh. The present petitic Jhe trial Court however, allow^d chl^fc641^ WTc^f^rf^& <<f^t<<-ci'< ^3Tf^T3TT^^T for fhe petHioQers. .el for respondeats, Article 227 of the Coastitutioa of |the order dated 13-7-2004 (Annexurc- Dtetnct Judge, Raipur, ia M.J.C. No. t004 whereby the appeal filed by the by 10th Civil Judge, Class II, \P/2) m Civfl Sult No. 12-A/2003, ffled ?tion ia favour of respondente, was i|e fhat respondent NQ.I filed a sidt ^ider 39 Rute 1 and 2 of the Code of itxBiaing the petifioners fix>m canying the game of Judo in fhe State of |ners filed fhe repty to fhe application. ftie application and granted llie (^^f^ XI-HC-22 3TI^$T^ f^TT^OT^^T 3Rt<^^rfl?T ^^ET r^ww<4, v^iww, i^^W^ ^T^?5T ^^TT^ TF!, 200 OT^^T^eiraf?^rft^r mjuiiction vide order dated 20-| cr>i^Io41vi+ii^c^T^T(^L<Si ^Ri^-ca^ ^3lf^T3TI^9T 2-2004 (Aimexurc-P/2). The petitfoners filed the appeal again.st the sai<^ order* The appellate Court rejected fhe appeal. In fhis petition, an argt(ment has been raised fhat rcspomlent no,l has not been properly subimtted tfaat the petitioners described by the respondent plamtiff, It is contended fhat suit filed by fhe respondents w^uld also not be mamtaiaabte, To elucidate the abovd submits lliat respondent no, 1| joiaed. Coiaiisel for fhe petitioaers have jomed the rcspondent no. 1 as is Ino. 1 itself beforc fhe tdEal court as a tf this petitioxi is xiot maisitaiiiable, fhe , leamed counsel for the ^titioners filed fhe suit by fhe name Chhattisgarh State Judo Association ms|:ead of Chhattisgarh Pradesh Judo Associatfon by which aame tijiey have beeii registercd wifh Registrar Societie^ (Annexure R-l) and i1| is appeared fix>m the recoxds of fhe trial court which have been caUedj Issue no, 1 is for fhat purpose, It is submitted that after re-organi^ation of fhe State, fhe acthdties of the gaoie ofJudo is paralyzed. In fact, Chhattisgarh was not rcpresented m fhe touraamerit organized on l|6ib October, 2004 and prior to Ifaat also, (^^f^ XI-HC.22 '\' ^?T<CT f^T[cj?3T?^^T ^rtsp^rf^T ^3:5T[?:qTqTp5Z[, tp-ai^<i6, f^T^fy an^^rcra^ ^^^i?ew TF[200 ^r^sr W^^T i^cTT^R ^ffln Now ia fhie moxifhs of May aajd Chanipionship aiid ofher wiU be no representatioii of orders, It is submitted fhat one ] rcsignation (Annexure P-5) ox3| Therefore, he did not want| caiididatare of one Balbir Association. Leamed counsel fl tourdaments issue has been fraoied bv fhe Q Leamed counsel for bofb estri delayed and they pray for prevailbig m relatton to game o\ the date 10th of May, 2005 foi^ sides in fhe Trial Court, This Cozirt has gone by fhe Coitrts below. It is fiirther s?5%8T'tihiat one person note|d cp^fc)4)v1 +1MoT^?l^l^l ^Rl^-CK ^3rf^H3ff^^T June fhis year, Semor National Judo are to be orgasiized and fberc phhattisgarh because of fhe aforesaid iGaiiga Raia Sharma has submitted his fhe groiind of xais-uaer of his naxiie, to contmue and he has supported Juneja, Chhattisgarh Pradesh Judo ?r fhe respondents pointed out that fhis ourt below, the parties submit that fhe matter is rty disiwsal because of circiamstances >Judo ioi fhe State ofC,G» aoid agreed for exaximiation ofwitiiesses fipom both fhe fhrjough the records aiid fhe oxders passed fhat the issues have been fiamed. It is |Ganga Ram has resigaed and supported (^^tf^ ,\ . [\ XI-HC.22 31T^9T<RT f^TTc^OT^^T Pi^Tt^^rf^T tWlf' ^ /^ "^ 4 ^Srf -qiqi^<l, y^l'<-f<lco, Rlrtl^^ ^T^fTSR^ qTq?5T ^^TT^ 7F[200 f^r^sr 3TT^5T ^PiT^R ^Tfi?T ^i<4[o<i1»i+ii^oV^f^St >(RI<<-CK ^3Tf^T37T^^T fhe candidature of one Balbir Jjuneja, It is also noted fhat fhe sidt was filed by respondent No, 1 ia tie name of Chhatfcisgarh State Judo Association iastead of Chliatds^arh Pradesh Judo Association. Having considered fhe f^cts and circumstances of the case and the matenal on record, ends ojfjustice wfll be sewed if a dircction is given to the pailies to produce evidence shaU be coiapleted or| ^he evidence on 10th May, 2005 and the day to day basis ie, oa 11th and 12^ May, 2005 onwards axid fhe su|it itselfwiU be decided by the trial Couxt stricUy ia accordaace wifh lawj as earty as possible prcfexabfy by 30th June, 2005, wifhout beiag infl^ienced by aay ofthe obseryatioas made by fhe Courts below while deci4ing fhe appU^ation under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 offhe Code ofCivH Pro<|;edure. With fhe aforesaid observjations fhis petition stands disposed o£ Consequenffy, aU pen< appUcations also staad disposed o£ Records of fhe courts be)low be sent back forthwitli by a Special ^ Messenger alongwith fhe copy o|fthis brder, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (^^fi^