IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11141 of 2010 SACHCHIDANAND JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner questions his suspension by an order dated 23.6.2010. Referring to two show cause notice issued to him on 28.5.2010 and 29.5.2010, it is submitted that the primary reason for the suspension is his alleged delay of reaching the office late during a camp by at best half an hour to one hour. He next submits that in fact, no applications submitted by the aggrieved were pending with the petitioner as mentioned in the show cause notice and the order of suspension. In fact, most of the applications in- charge of the petitioner had been substantially disposed off. Learned counsel for the State submits that the second show cause notice relied upon by the petitioner as also the order of suspension was explicit in its recitals and it shall not be the jurisdiction of this Court to enter into facts at this stage whether the order of suspension was justified or not even in view of the submission of the petitioner. 2 While this Court concurs with the submission of the petitioner with regard to his suspension on the first ground with regard to his alleged delay in arrival at the camp, there is no occasion for this Court to pronounce upon the same as it is not a ground for suspension mentioned in the impugned order dated 23.6.2010. If the petitioner represents and satisfies the authorities that the application pending before him had been substantially disposed off nothing shall preclude the respondents from re-considering the issue of suspension, if they are otherwise satisfied. The application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)