j ,,. K . W BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR g, W TAX CASE Naé/fO ‘Wg r. wwwfg J APPELLANT wCommissioner of Income Tax, K. Raipur VERSUS RE§PONDENT ’ yr-‘Shri Ram Niwas Agarwal, Prop. M/ s. Agarwal Traders, Station Road, Raipur APPEAL U/S: 266(A) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 é ; K . § m ’ 5 ” am mm %? 3€fa2¥ 3,11%: DIVI$ION BENCH: ‘ 311%?! m mm mmm \ i ‘ WW g; wgv» gmr 3 HON'BLE MR. DHIRENDRA MISHRA & HDN‘RIF MR R L Ihnnwnr .TJ M” l «r yer . 02.4.2009 Mr‘. S. Rajeshwar‘ Rao, Standing Counsel for' fhe i appellanf The ma‘r‘rer‘ Is lIsfed on default ‘ Learned ‘counsel for and the appellanf prays for and is §ranTed four weeks' fime 1‘0 Hemove the default, failing Which fhe pefifion shall aufomafically sfand dismissed wifhouf fur’rher‘ reference f0 The Bench. f/ sal- l i ‘ l l l sm- .1 R JhamNal DmENDRA mSHRA Jadge Judge l l \ l 0 K l l l l é‘ l . mgarnawrl-slwirrl1/:‘.:u)7;~- gm? mm