1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2010 (Himayu Khan Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. S.S.Jadhav, APP, for the petitioner. Mr. V.D.Rakh, APP, for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:25-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Smt.Jadhav, Counsel for the accused applicant Himayu Khan and learned A.G.P. 2. Conditions were imposed while entertaining the application in terms of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.in Criminal Application No.2860/2009 dt.9th Sept.,2009. The time was extended as sought by the learned Counsel and the Counsel informs, the accused/applicant has deposited with the administrator Rs.75,000/-, Rs.3,25,000/- by demand drafts, for which he has a letter dt.20th Feb.,2010, issued by the Administrator of the Bank. 3. Considering these 2 aspects, there is sufficient compliance of the orders of this Court. The authorities/Police made whatever interrogation they desired during the intervening period. The accused/applicant is a permanent resident of Beed, availed loan, burnt his fingers in the misappropriation carried in a racket by influential personalities in the Bank - employees of the Bank. 4. Considering the above facts, the direction in paragraph no.6, to attend the concerned investigator and auditor on every Sunday for three months between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. is not warranted, and direction in paragraph No.7 for clearing the dues, in the order dt.9th Sept.,2009, being complied with, are recalled. Application allowed to the above extent. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/3-10crapl