THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.24038 of 2007 Dated: 5.2.2008 Between: Palla Satyanarayana. .... PETITIONER AND The Sub-Registrar, Rajam Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 24038 of 2007 Order: This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents not to act on the letter Rc.No.A3/4329/2002 dated 18.10.2002 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Srikakaulam directing the respondents not to register the lands in Sy.No.8 of Dolapet Villagte and also not to give pattadar passbooks. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. It is the case of the petitioner that he is cultivating the lands in survey No.8 in an extent of Ac.00.50 cents situate in Dolpet Village, Rajam Mandal in Srikakulam District and basing on the impugned letter, the respondents are not registering the transaction in respect of the lands in survey No.8 and are also not giving the pattadar pass books. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court on 15.11.2007, while admitting the writ petition, the respondents have filed a counter affidavit inter alia stating that the petitioner has not filed any documentary evidence in support of his case to show that he has presented any document for alienation of the land in Sy.No.8 of Dolapet Village and that the 1st respondent has refused for registration of the same. Equally, the petitioner has never made any application to the 2nd respondent for grant of a pattadar pass book. It is also stated that the Adangals/Pahani and the entries made therein show that in respect of Sy.No.8, the pattadar is the Diety Sri Lakshmi Narayana Uma Maheswara Swamu Varu and in column No.13 of the pahani, various persons names were shown as enjoyers and the name of the petitioner is shown in the said column. The above stated facts are not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Without there being any cause of action, the petitioner has filed this writ petition questioning the power of the Assistant Commissioner, Endowments to issue the proceedings dated 18.10.2002 that too, without making him a party to these proceedings. Admittedly, the petitioner has neither submitted any application to the 2nd respondent for grant of pattadar pass- book nor submitted any document to the 1st respondent for registration in respect of the land in question. Without there being any cause of action, this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot imagine the things and grant the relief as prayed for. The writ petition is premature and it is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the authorities for grant of pattadar passbooks, if he is so advised. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 5.2.2008 msv