IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51706 of 2008 DEEPAK KUMAR RAI @ DEEPAK KUMAR, son of Suresh Rai, Resident of village – Muserpur, P.S. Kalyanpur, District - Samastipur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.1.2009 Heard. The case is under section 394 of I.P.C. and petitioner is not named in the FIR. He has not been put on Test Identification Parade probably because some of the witnesses examined in paragraphs 9 and 10 have claimed that they had identified the petitioner and another as persons who had snatched the motorcycle from the informant. The simple contention is that the other accused has been admitted to bail and further that if at all the witnesses had identified the petitioner and any one else as amongst the culprits, their names ought to have appeared in the F.I.R. There is no recovery from the petitioner. Let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/ (ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Samastipur in Musrigharari P.S. Case no. 97 of 2008. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )