6 F' l^)^— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION fS)NO. ^<sl^ /2006 <Y%^ .^^ .• ^'F'-/ 7X^-' ^/^^;' .f^ .^•' ^' <-'.^' bv ^ r-) ^ ^ T ^ / f^' ^ -^^0 €€°^. ^•rtn '^?J (/ J.P. Tiwari, / S/o- Sliri R.P. Tiwari, ..Aged about 59 years, ^esently working as Deputy Ranger, . - /''Bakawand Range, Bastar~Fcirest~Divis46n, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Principal Secretary, Deptt. ofForest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Divisional Forest OfGcer. •' Bastar Forest Division, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NAJU^E OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. I* XI-HC-78 sn^r^Tl^iN; (raT3TI^r,sh1 .s^ ^ TS? •^iwict^, w^w\6, Rldiy^ <TI*1CTr StflfVK W=[ 200 3TT^5T CT?^ (yil^q^ir) ?TffRR:Bf?(T3TI^r 11 -8-2006 Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, cotjnsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy ^ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition of !ndia, the petitioner has cha!le|iged his transfer order dated 17-1-2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by respcjndent No.1, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Bakawand Grievance of the petitione st going to retire on 31'" Septemberi employees who are about to retis aiiowed to make a representati^ for the State/ respondents has no the facts and circumstances of <tii<ilrt41.f wicrf ^ fgsS Ti^fRK ^aTf^trsn^T under Article 226/227 of the Constitution Range to Dantewada Forest Division. • raised in this writ.petition is that he is 2007, thereby he has only left with one year service. Learned counsel for the p^titioner submits that oniy one year is ieft for the petitioner's retirement a(id as per the Government policy, the :e within one year, shall not normally be subjected to transfer, as the pen^ion case of the empioyees have to be -^' processed. Learned counsel fur^her submits that the petitioner may be n to respondent No.1 arrd respondent No.1 be direcfed to decide the sa|me, towhich learned counsei appearing objection. Having heard learned coui|)se! for the parties and having regard to the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner apo^ars to be iust, fair and reasonabte. Therefore, the petitioner is allow^d to make a detailed representation fo respondent No.1 raising a.'l his grfevances, annexing a copy ofthe instant writ petition and its annexures wi hin a period of ten days from today and ,* P.T.O. 2-r XI-HC-78 S^ '<)i<iici^, aiTny'is, Rjdiy^ HWWl ShHlth ;'^ 3n^?rT3gT (<^3g^T) STI^Tw R-ii* traTsn^TgiiTR; Soma !> ^(ITWBfScTSTI^T .-2,- in turn, respondent No.1 is direct^d one month from the date of its raised by the petifioner in an objec^ With the aforesaid directionl Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.No| stand djsposed of. Parties are entitled for certii] ^TprfrN^r WRTt'ff teA Tf^RZTC ^srf^trgn^T to decide the same within a period of ireceipt, considering all the grievances Kve manner, in accordance with law. the writ petition stands disposed of. 13256/2006 and I.A.No.7732/2006 also jed copy of this order. Sd/- L.< P.T.O. I*