1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 446 OF 2008 Mari Ram Devendra & anr. ...Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. .....Respondents Mrs. Jyoti Chavan for the petitioners. Mrs. A.S. Pai APP for the State. Shri Vinod Singh for Respondent no.2. CORAM; BILAL NAZKI & A.P. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED; 7TH APRIL, 2008. P.C.: 1. The case of the petitioner is that he is facing charges for offences under sections 323, 324, 427 and 506 read with 34 of IPC and the petitioner has resolved his dispute with the complainant. Therefore the criminal case should be quashed. He had moved an application before the trial court. The trial court held that, sections 323, 324 and 427 being compoundable but since section 502 was not compoundable, he did not close the matter. Such controversy was pending before the Full Bench and Full Bench has given certain guidelines. Therefore this writ petition is disposed of and the petitioner is permitted to move fresh application before the Magistrate who shall consider the matter in accordance with the directions and guidelines of the Full Bench. 2 (BILAL NAZKI J.) (A.P. DESHPANDE J.)