1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1038/2008 (Shobha Revan Siddha VERSUS Union of India & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. S.R. Hedaoo, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.B. Ahirkar, counsel for the Union of India. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 25, 2008. Heard. The counsel for the petitioner states that in the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is in respect of reduction in Nursing Allowance. It is contended that in identical situation, in Writ Petition No.6194/2006, the respondent filed pursis, wherein it is stated that the case of revision of Nursing Allowance is under consideration of Government of India and the same will be revised on receipt of the decision by Government of India. The counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submitted that in view of the above referred pursis filed by the respondent, this Court disposed of the writ petition vide order dated 16.10.2007 with the direction to the respondent to take a decision in respect of revision of Nursing Allowance within a period of 2 four months from the date of receipt of the said order dated 16.10.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.6194/2006. The counsel for the petitioner also submitted that in the said order it was also observed by the Division Bench of this Court that till the decision is taken by the Government of India in respect of Nursing Allowance, respondents shall not take any action for recovery of Nursing Allowance from the petitioner in the said writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner, therefore, contended that the present writ petition may also be disposed of in view of the reasons stated in the order dated 16.10.2007 passed in the Writ Petition No.6194/2006. The learned counsel for the Union of India does not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. In the circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of in view of the reasons stated and directions given in the order dated 16.10.2007 passed in the Writ Petition No.6194/2006. JUDGE JUDGE APTE