IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10496 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.05.2010 Bhupinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. S K Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to change his address in the Arms Licence No.9/DM/Jind/January/92. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has applied for change in the address in the Arms Licence vide his application dated 2.3.2009 (Annexure P-1) on which no decision has been taken so far. Learned counsel further states that at this stage, the petitioner shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to take a decision on the application (Annexure P-1) within a time-bound frame. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to take a decision on the application (Annexure P-1) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 28, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE