-.KK"Siv-S •31HGI F RFK3^ ,^,£'f^.'^''<3__^ U,S 'ir,.-.'•'I s~i •''.''' " ^^' \^f ^ IN THE HON'BLE HI&H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) \\? ^/Q WRIT PETCTEON ( S ) N0, OF-30^— y PETCTEONER: ^..•^^y ^".'^"^y \^ '<^'.°7 'A1^^7 -••^.y>" .<;-.• o; t?' ^: :' ..y RESPONDENTS Budhwar Singh Kanwar S/o. Shri Roop Singh Kanwar, aged about 63 years, occupation - Retired Upper Division Teacher , r/o. village - Leemdih, Post - Tuman, Viya - Bhaishma, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) VERSUS ^l. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, DKS Building Raipur (C.6.) II j-^0 ^- 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korba, Distt.- Korba ( C.6.) ^3. The Accountant General, Account and Pension, Pension Bada Raipur, Distt.- Raipur . 4. District Education officer, Korba Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, Vikash Khand Poudi Uproda, Distt.- Korba (C.,6.) , 6. Principal, 6ovt. Middle School, Tanera, Vikash Khnad Poudi, Uproda, Distt.- Korba ( C.6.) WRIT PETTTEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF CONSTETUTION OF INDIA. ^~ HIGH CCTJRTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASWR' WMTPETmON(S) No.ll8Qf2010 PETTnONER : BudhwarSinghKanwar. VEKSU8 KESPONDENTS : The State ofGhhattisgaA & O&as. WKIT PETmON UNDER ARI1CLE 226 OF THE CONS'n'nJTlON OF IND1A SB: Hon'ble Slri Satish K. Aenihotei. J. Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate forfhe petitieuia'. Shri N.N.Roy, Paael Lawyer fwtiae State. Shri R.Pradhan, Advocate fortiie re^ondent No. 3. ORALORUER (Passed on 11" day ofJsmuary, 2010) With the conseut ofleamed counsel ^tpearing tor tfie parties, tte matta- is heard fiiially. 1. Leaned counsel appeam^ fw the petitioner sutanits that the ease, being payment of reth-al beae&s matter, inay be refenied to Ae paision conmuttee. 2. 'ITas Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/M04 (Bai/naA McMdal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other eonnected mattere, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts wwe mvolved.ITie C(Mainittee was constituted by tiie Stale Govamnent» pursuant to the oida- dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. KejaBatChwuh-dkar ys. StateGovermnentcmdolhers) and order datal 13.&3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Othwsv. Bcnjnatti Mandal and another). Thus, tiris petitioa is squatdy covae<t by tto judgment and wder dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baynath Mandal (supra) as sutamtted by leamed eounsel appearing tor the parties. 3. With Ifae eonsent ofthe parties, Ais petitimi is accwdmgly disposed of in fhe saine terms i.«.the officeofthe Advocate Qwecal s dit'ectedto sendtheeasetotheComnrittee, witfunaperiodoflS days ofreeeipt of a copy ofthe petition from Ihe petitioner and tias order. Tliereafler, tte Conmiittee shall issue notice to the petitioner and fhe officers concemed, within a furfcer period of 15 days. Th®C< shall consider aad pass orda", in accordance wifli law, after affor^ag proper opportumty ofhearmg to the petitioner. The petitioner and Ifae ofBeers concemed may fUe additional documents, if'aeeessary. The entire exercise, mcluding payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period offour amaths from tto date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra eopy of tiie petition to the leamed counset appearing for the respondents for forwardiag.the same to the CQmnrittee. Sd/- SATISH K. AGNMOTRI Judge Amit