IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 10048 of 2004 BETWEEN: Smt. Sabiha, W/o Vasantha Kumar Naidu @ Mohammed Omar, R/o D. No. 42-815, Khadarsab-ki-Galli, Moulali, Hyderabad - 040. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Moulali Police Station, Moulali, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Malkajigiri, R.R. District. 3 Khaja Rayweesuddin, S/o Khaja Allauddin, R/o D. No. 42-815, Khadarsab-ki-galli, Moulali, Hyderabad. 4 Naseer, S/o Khaja Allauddin, R/o D. No. 42-815, Khadarsab-ki- galli, Moulali, Hyderabad - 040. 5 Pratap Reddy, S/o Butchi Reddy, Hindu, R/o Jawahar Nagar, Beside M.S. Hospital, Hyderabad. 6 Mazhar, R/o D. No. 42-815, Khadarsab-ki-galli, Moulali, Hyderabad . 7 Md. Chand Pasha, S/o Md. Ameenuddin, Major, R/o D. No. 42-69, Khadarsab-ki-galli, Moulali, Hyderabad. 8 Md. Muzhar, S/o Md. Pasha Miya, Major, R/o D. No. 41-82-27/1, Sadhulla Nagar, Moulali, Hyderabad -040. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not providing the petitioner and her husband name P. Vasantha Kumar now known as Mohammed Omar with protection as illegal, and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and it is further consequentially prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to provide the necessary protection to the lives of the petitioner and her husband by seeing that all the belongings of the petitioners are handed over to her from the house of the 3rd respondent and by seeing that the petitioner and her husband are escorted to her husband place at Housing Board, Moulali, and by watching the movements of this respondents 3 to 6 to enable the petitioner and her husband to live peacefully and take any appropriate steps to protect their lives and it is further consequentially prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased direct the 1st respondent police to close any case registered against her husband in this regard in the light of the decision of this Hon'ble court in the case of Nahwasad Vs. Meer Chowk, Police reported in 1999(5) ALT 25 (DB) and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.R.SANKU & KAVITI MURLI KRISNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. K. Neelakanteswara Rao, learned counsel representing Mr. S.R. Sanku, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause to be adjudicated. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 23, 2008 DSK