HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.A. P.R. No. 366/09 iv; w \33w i APPELLANT Krishna ChaJld S/o Shri Rameshwar aged about 54 years ‘residEnt of \ {Defendant} i Village-Bejemal Revenue Circle Number Sankara, Tahsil & District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. indubai Wdio Rajim Rawat aged (Plaintiife) about 58 years. 2. .Harishanar S/o Shn' Rajim Rawat aged about 34 years. 3. Gopraj S/o Shn' Rajim Rawat aged about 3O years. Respondent NO. 1 i0 3 are resident of village Uttekel Revenue Circle Boaxd Sankara Tahsil Dist. Mahasamund (QGJ. Pmwasi (Purnwasi) D/o Shn' Rajim Rawat aged‘ about 36 years, Resident of Village Beldeeh Bundeli Dist. Mahasamund (CG; 5. Mathura D/o Shii/RAjim Rawat aged about 33 years, Resident of Village Reekhaddadar Dharampur Sankara Tahsil & Dist. Mahasamund (C.G.). Gopika'’ D/o Shri Rajim Rawat aged about 26 years Resident of Village parsoda Bundeli Dist; Mahasamund (C.G.). 7. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Mahasamund Dist. Mahasamund (C.G.}. SECOND APPEAL UIS 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908. v Arising out of the Judgment and decree dated 22/ 10/ 2008 passed by the .1 First Additional District Judge Mahasamund Dlst Mahasamund 1n c1v11 appeal NO 54-A/ 2004 (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma‘: J.) resentz- Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate for the appellant. ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 3 1 I 03] 2009! 1. During the course of argument learned counsel for the appellant gubrmts that he seeks to Withdraw this appeal 2 Prayer allowed 3i Accordmgly, the appeal 1s d1sm1ssed as Withdrawn ##M r 7, 4 Sdl- T p Sharma not“ Judge No order as to the costs