fllGH COURT OF 0HHATTISGARH“: BiLAb‘PUR WRIT PETITION 13) NO.7_374 OF 2010 PETmONER Ishwar Prasad Ni$had ¥ Versus L RESPONDENI The Sate of Chhattisgarh & Clthers (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Const6tution of india) Singb Bench Hon’ble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Present .- Shn Awadh Tripathl Advocate for the petmoners Shn A.V. Sndhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. $hri Pankaj Agrawai, Advocate for the responderit No.4. ORDER bRAL (Passed on this 25 day of February, 201 1) ’ At the very outset, teamed counsel appearing for we parties jointty and / r .feiriy submit that the issue involved in the present petition as weil ae in : Dhaniram & Gihers y, State of Chhaitisgerh & Ofhers’, whish was considered and decided by this Court on 20.01.2011, are ideniieai. Thereafter, the said issue was reconsidered in VirendraVDas Manr‘kpuri e Others v. The state or ohhattisgarh e ethersé by this Cour: on 10.02201 1. Thus, the instant netition is squareiy covered by the orders passed by this court in Dhaniram & Others’ and Virendre Des Manikpuri e whens? 2. in view of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of ihe orders passed in Dhanirem &.Others’ and Wendie Des Manikpuri & Others? Satish K. Agnihotri v Judge \ Arun u' 1W P (S) No 6798 of 2010 decided on 20 'i 2011 2W P (S) NO 7450 pf 2010 decided on 10 2 2011