1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2735 OF 2011. (Ku. Vanita d/o Laxmanrao Chamlate Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri V.G. Wankhede, Adv. for Petitioner. Shri T.R. Kankale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri C.S. Kaptan, Adv. for Respondent No.2. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2011. Heard finally by consent of parties. Petitioner was appointed by an order dated 14.08.1996 and according to her, it is in general category. According to respondent the appointment was against reserved category post and has been regularized as such and approval granted by Education Department is also against reserved category post i.e., as belonging to Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner has procured validity on 19.07.2007 as belonging to ‘Gowari’ S.B.C. Respondent no.2 has called upon her to produce validity as a Scheduled Tribe candidate. This 2 communication dated 31.05.2011 is questioned before us. In this situation as initial appointment order does not mention any appointment against any reserved category post, we accordingly permit the petitioner to make appropriate representation to respondent no.2 by 10.10.2011. If such representation is made by petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider the same as early as possible and in any case by 15.10.2011. Subject to this petition liberty to petitioner and direction to respondent no.2 to decide representation, we dispose of petition. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE NSN