IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.603 OF 2003 Shri.Pramod Bhiku Mokal ...Petitioner Versus Sou.Sunandra Pramod Mokal & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Ms.Gavand i/b Mr.Shreekant V.Gavand for Petitioner. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. OCTOBER 21, 2004. OCTOBER 21, 2004. OCTOBER 21, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The Court below has considered relevant aspects of the matter to conclude that the Petitioner is liable to pay maintenance to the Respondent No.1 at the rate of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand), as can be discerned from discussion in Paragraphs 7 and 9 of the decision of the Trial Court. The Revisional Court has, in my opinion, : 2 : rightly dismissed the Revision, as there was no infirmity, either in the approach or the conclusion reached by the Trial Court on the basis of materials before it. Hence, no case for interference. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.