IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18183 of 2009 AKHILESH MAHTO SON OF LATE SUKHRAM MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAURIHAR,P.S.RAXAUL,DISTT.EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 17.7.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 1 of this application. Heard learned counsel for the parties. After recovery of dead body of the informant’s son, present case has been registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant has suspected that as his son was having some dispute with Ramkaram Rai, Rumi, Mantu, Umesh Singh, Ganesh Rai and Ram Balak Rai, he might have been killed by them. Submission is that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and most of the above named accused have been granted bail by different orders of this Court. Further submission is that no body has seen the occurrence and the petitioner was also not seen with the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Sikrahana at Motihari, East Champaran in Dhaka P.S.Case No. 74 of 2007. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)