^ 'e? c-^ <Ss> _, ":.& HLGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: B8LASPUR SingIeBench: Appellant Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. iyi.A.CNo.1375of2007 Lokmanya Sahakari Grih Nirman Sanstha Maryadit - Having its office at Gol Chowk, Rohinipuram, Raipur (CG) ~ Through its President, Lokmamnya Sahakari Grih Nirman Sanstha Maryadit Raipur (CG) Versus Respondents 1. Ramkunwar Bai, W/o Pardesiram Sahu, aged about 50 years 2. Laxmi Prasad : Sahu, D/o Late PardesiramSahu,; aged about 20 years 3. Dilip Kumar Sahu, S/o Pardesiram Sahu, aged about 17 years -through its natural guardiajn motherRamkunwar Bai. ; (All R/o Ramkund Para; .Behind Maharashtra Mandal, Raipur (CG) 4. The Commis^ioner, Workmen3s Compensation - Through its Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Raipur, Distt. Raipur(CG) IVIiscellaneous appeal under Section 30 of the Workme^^ CompensatsonAct Present: . Shri P.R. Patahkar, counsei for the appellant Shri Atul Pandey, counsel for respondents No.1 to 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 29.08.2008) The appetlant is aggrieved by the award dated;24.09.2007 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Raipur (CG) (henceforth the, 'Commissioner') in case No-179/WC ACT/2006 FATAL, whereby compensation ofRs.1,02,444/- was awarded in a death case. 2. It is not disputed by the tearned counsel for the appellant that the deceased namely Pardesi Ram was a watchman employed by the appellant and was discharging his duties in the premises ofthe appellant at the time when he died dueto eiectrocution. 3. During the course of the arguments, an amicable settlerrtbnt was arrived at between the parties, whereunder in view of the age of the deceased" and the satary drawn by him, the leamed counsel for the °i • IliB§ lli^ Priya _^-^^- respondents No.1 to 3 agreed that thecompensation awarded by the Commissioner be modified to Rs.84,000/-. 4 . Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he has no objection ifthe amount of Rs.84,000/- is disbursed to the respondents No.1 to 3. 5. lt was prayed by learned counsel for the parties that the appeal be accordingly disposed. 6. On perusal of record, 1 am satisfied that in the facts and circumstances in which Pardesiram died due to etectrocution, the settiement arrived atisjust. 7. Accordingly, the award passed by the Commissioner in case No-179/WC ACT/2006 FATAL is modified to the extent that compensation awarded is reduced to Rs.84,000/-. Out Of the sum deposited by the appellant herein, the amount of Rs.84,000/- shall be disbursed forthwith to the respondents No.1 to3, The remaining amount shall be refunded to the appellant 8. With the above modification, the appeal stands disposed of. M ti '^ t^ v^9a-^w ^^ \,^--- Iri^-wt^.?—-^ r""^ •^,