IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15713 of 2009 RAMJI CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither he was arrested on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession nor he was even named in the F.I.R. although the informant is well known to him as both of them are resident of same Mohalla. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is allegation that the brother of the informant sustained injury on his arms but no charge under Sections 307, 323 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code was leveled. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that only on the basis of confessional statement of a co-accused petitioner has been implicated although there is no other material to support his statement. Learned counsel for petitioner states that though the petitioner is in custody since February, 2009 but no test tidentification parade has yet 2 been done. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely, Ramjee Chaudhary be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 424 of 2008, Trial No. 2462 of 2009. S.Sb/- (S.N. Hussain, J.)