IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1650 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1650 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1650 OF 2008 Yamunabai Kisan Bagade & Anr. ... Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Ujwal Agandsurve for the applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 27th June 2008. DATED: 27th June 2008. DATED: 27th June 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in connection with C.R.No.22/2008 registered with Karmala Police Station, Solapur for the offences punishable under sections 302, 504, 506 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Having heard the matter for sometime and having invited attention of the learned counsel for the applicants to the observations made by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Solapur in his order dated 5th May, 2008 passed in Criminal Misc.Application No.484/2008, the involvement of both accused in the offence alleged cannot be ruled out. Having found this, at the time of dictating the order, learned counsel for the applicants urged that he does not want to press this application so far as applicant No.2 is concerned. However, he pressed this application on behalf of applicant No.1 on the solitary ground that she is 72 years old and mother of the complainant. 4. As a matter of fact, looking to her involvement, it is difficult to say that the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge rejecting bail to the applicants is incorrect order. However, looking to the age of applicant No.1, in my view, she is entitled to bail. 5. In view of the above, so far as applicant No.2 applicant No.2 applicant No.2 is concerned, this application is rejected rejected rejected. 6. So far as applicant No.1 is concerned, I am inclined to grant bail in her favour, subject to the following conditions: (a) The applicant No.1, arrested in connection with C.R.No.22/2008 registered with Karmala Police Station, Solapur shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- - 3 - with one or two local sureties to make up the said amount. (b) The applicant No.1 shall report to the concerned Police Station once in a week, i.e. on every Saturday between 3.00 to 5.00 p.m. till conclusion of the trial. She shall co-operate with the investigating agency for disposal of the case. (c) The order of bail will be given effect only after the applicant No.1 furnishes to the investigating officer the details about her place of residence and address where she proposes to stay after she is enlarged on bail. She will not change her residential address thereafter till the conclusion of trial without prior intimation to the investigating officer. (d) The applicant No.1 shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement or threat or pressurise any prosecution witnesses and shall not in any manner tamper with the prosecution evidence. - 4 - (e) It is needless to mention that breach of any of the conditions by the applicant shall result in cancellation of bail. (f) Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as finding or expression on merits of the case at the time of trial. 7. Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE