IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.513/2000 Jagannath S/o Shri Ghasi ...plaintiff-appellant Versus Gopal Lal S/o Shri Madho ...defendant-respondent Date of Order ::: 13.11.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Manoj Sharma, Counsel for plaintiff-appellant Shri Santosh Kumar Jain, Counsel for defendant- respondent #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction, which was dismissed by the lower court. The judgment and decree passed by the lower court has been affirmed by the first appellate court also. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties in the light of the findings of both the courts below and after considering their submissions as well as the findings of both the courts below I find that the controversial issues involved in the present case are relating to question of fact and there is concurrent finding of fact by both the courts below, which cannot be interfered with by this court in second appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C. No substantial question of law is involved in this second appeal and the same is dismissed at admission stage itself with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//