IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44161 of 2010 1. RAM PARSAN SINGH S/O LATE BINDESHWARI SINGH 2. MAJOJ SINGH S/O RAMPARSAN SINGH 3. RAJMATI DEVI W/O RAMPARSAN SINGH 4. SAROJ DEVI W/O MANOJ SINGH 5. SUNITA DEVI D/O RAMPARSAN SINGH 6. NIRPENDRA SINGH @ BHUPENDRA SINGH S/O LATE BHARATH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 304 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioners are the parent-in-laws, brother-in-law, sister-in-law and co-villagers of the deceased. It has further been submitted that initially a U.D. case was instituted, where after 11 months later the present complaint was instituted which was sent for investigation under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. but it ended in final report and thereafter 4 months later the protest-cum-complaint petition was filed in which cognizance was taken. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within three weeks from 2 today in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2005, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)