^, •IT p'B'Tmrwi? /< riLiii. 107 'ETITIONEI l??7.' lENTi 2. Gyaii La! Chauhan Aged about 48 Years, S/o Sliri Dil bodh Chauhan Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Kasaipa! Tateil Kliarsia Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Sanatan Prasad Chauhan Ased about 43 years S/o Ganesh Rain Chauhan Assistant Teacher, boys Hostel Kharsia Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Sehool Education Department D.K.S. ihawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instmction Departnient Raipur(C.G:) District Education OiEcer Khai-sia, Distt. RaigariifC.G.) Block Education OfBcei- Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Assistaat Commissioner Tribal Welfare DepartaiieHt Raigarh (C.G.) WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH] 'TSTFTUnON OF INDIA- Shri Aail Mour^-a, A-dvocate for the petitioners Sliri A.S.Kaeluwafaa, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. (Passed on 26tB dsy of June, 2007) 1. TSie question of 3aw involved herein is asto w'faether fhs petitioners eatitled to regular pay scale w.e.fthe date ofmitia! appointment or f the date ofcomoletion oforobation period. 2. Leamed coimse! appearmg fbr the petitioners 'as well as for the State/respondeats jointly submit fhat the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitioa ars the same as to that ofin W.P.(S) ^. No. 5976/2006 fSushffl Tiwari and others Vs. State Govermnent of Chhattisgarh & Others), wfaich was allowed vide order dated 7.11 .2006. 3. However, the State Govemment is at libert>r to verify the appointment of the petitioners in orderto find out wfaetherthe facts ofthe present case are ideiitica! to that ofW.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (supra). 4. In view offhe above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ uetition is aUowed in the same terms. No order as to ^- costs. Sd/- .• , Satish KAgnihotri . Judge Asal