IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 486 OF 2005 SHRI MARIO PEREIRA, MAJORDA-GOA. ....Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND 2 ....Respondents ORS., Mr. P. A. Kholkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. G. Bhonsule, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 9th January, 2006 P.C. The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that the respondents have furnished most of the relevant documents to the petitioner and in view of certain facts revealed to the petitioner from those documents, it would be necessary either to amend the present petition extensively or to file a fresh petition. Considering the same, the learned Advocate for the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh comprehensive petition. The petition is, accordingly, allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. The petition stands disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.