THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.3763 of 2011 ORDER: The 1st respondent issued a notification on 08-06-2009, inviting applications for selection of dealers for retail out-let, on different locations in the State of Andhra Pradesh. One such location was, a place between Vadamalapeta and Gajulamandyam of Chittoor District, on National Highway No.205. The petitioner, 4th respondent and several others submitted applications. The selection committee conducted interviews on 11-09-2009. The 4th respondent was selected. In compliance with the request made by the petitioner, the respondents 1 to 3 have furnished the particulars of marks awarded to her, and the 4th respondent. The petitioner submits that though she had the necessary infrastructure and financial capacity, she was awarded virtually zero marks, whereas, almost full marks were awarded to the 4th respondent. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in selecting the 4th respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3. The petitioner has pointed out her grievance on several aspects. The particulars furnished by the respondents 1 to 3 discloses that, on several counts, the petitioner was awarded zero marks. In case the petitioner has any grievance about it, she ought to have approached the Grievance Redressal Committee. Further, across the Bar, the learned Standing Counsel has stated that the selection of the 4th respondent did not materialize for certain reasons. The result is that no dealer was selected for the location concerned. The petitioner can apply as and when fresh notification is issued by the 1st respondent. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.18-02-2011. KO