THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL PETITION No.2667 OF 2009 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of further proceedings in F.I.R.No.55 of 2009 on the file of the Station House Officer, Sattenapalle Rural police station, Guntur District. 2. None appeared for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the 1st respondent-State. Perused the record. 3. 2nd respondent herein gave a complaint against the petitioner herein-A2, based on which F.I.R.No.55 of 2009 was registered against the petitioner-A2 for the offences under Sections 420, 468, 471, 477-A r/w 34 IPC. 4. According to the complainant, he owns Ac.3.50 cents of land in Sy.No.42/3 of Dhulipala mandal and that he was issued a pattadar pass book in 1995 and he mortgaged the said land with the State Bank of Hyderabad, Sattenapalle branch and obtained a loan. He alleges that one Kotireddy and Bakka Chinapothaiah, in collusion with the Village Revenue Officer and the Ex-Mandal Revenue Officer, brought into existence the fabricated ryotwari pass book and also fabricated the adangals and mortgaged the same with the Andhra Bank, Brugubanda branch and applied for a loan of Rs.1,00,000/-. However, the bank refused to sanction the loan. Petitioner is specifically named in the First Information Report as one of the persons behind the creation of the alleged fabricated pass book and revenue records. The truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the First Information Report and the alleged role of the petitioner in commission of the alleged offences has to be necessarily determined only after due investigation into the complaint. 5. Having regard to the nature of the offences alleged and as specific allegations have been made against the petitioner to the effect that he has been trying to cheat the complainant, based on fabricated documents, it is held that there are absolutely no valid or sufficient grounds for quashing the further investigation in the matter. 6. By order, dated 23.04.2009, the interim stay of arrest of the petitioner-A2 was granted for a period of six weeks, with a direction that the petitioner-A2 shall cooperate with the investigation. Petitioner-A2 may not be arrested till the completion of the investigation. It is considered not a fit case to quash the further proceedings in pursuance of the First Information Report No.55 of 2009 in exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 7. In the result, Criminal Petition is dismissed, subject to the above direction. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 29th September, 2010 Tsy