@ 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’H‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Wn't Petition No 690 0f2005 Petitioner Pmmna Plarxtation, through — Its Proprietor, Vimkash Dutt Tiwazi, son 0f Shri K.D.Tiwari, aged about 30 yeam, Main Road, Surajpur, Distm'ct -— Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretaxy, ' Depanment of Rural Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Municipal Corporation Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Chhatu'sgarh), through its Chief Municipal Officer, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Ch hatisgarh) Versus 3. The Executive Engineer, Nag‘iya Niyojan Evam ‘Vikas Vibhag, Bilaspur (C. G.) 4. The President, Nagar Panchayat, Bishrampur, Disit. Surguja (C G.) 5. The Chief Municipal Omcer; Bihmmpur, Distt. Surguja (Chhatisgarh) 6. The Sub Engineer, Nagar Panchayat, Bishrampur, Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 7. Om Marketing, Ambikapur, through it Proprietor, Manish Gupta, Ramanujganj Naka, Ambikapur, District Surguja (Chhatiisgarh) 8. Shaiiesh Gupta, aged about 32 years, R/o Main Road, Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (CG) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shxi Sah'sh K. Agnihotri J.) Shn' V. Vijay, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 6. Shri Rajendra Tripat‘ni, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate for the resodnent No.7. O R D E R (Passed on this 3ra day of November, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to Withdraw this petition. 2. Learnd counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection. 3. In View Of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, M(W)P No. 563/2005 alsonismissed. Sdl- atish K. Agniiioti‘i ' Judge s ¢ S