HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 25355 OF 2009 Dated: 09-12-2009 Between: Prasanna Kumar Thotakura ... PETITIONER AND Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad and five others ... RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 25355 OF 2009 ORDER: (per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) This is a public interest litigation, wherein an advocate practising in this Court has made some allegations against respondent No.3. Looking to the developments which have been recorded by us today, we do not want to go into the allegations made. The grievance of the petitioner is that C.C No. 32 of 2008 has been filed against respondent No.3, which is pending since long before respondent No.1 and that the same is not being decided. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 has submitted that the proceedings had been concluded on 05-12-2009 and the final order would be pronounced within a week or so. In the circumstances, in our opinion, the aforestated grievance now does not survive. Another grievance is with regard to a complaint, which has been filed by a senior advocate of this Court viz., Sri G. Dhananjai against respondent No.3. According to the petitioner, no action has been taken by respondent No.1 against respondent No.3 in pursuance of the said complaint. Learned Standing Counsel, Sri N.V. Raghava Reddy, appearing for respondent No.1 has submitted that the said complaint has been given SR No. 113 of 2009 and it shall be placed before the General Council of respondent No.1 in a meeting which is to be convened in February, 2010. In view of the fact that the matters are pending before respondent No.1, we do not propose to go into the allegations and the counter allegations made by the parties against each other. In the circumstances, in our opinion, nothing further is required to be done by this Court in the matter. Therefore, the petition is dismissed. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP Nos. 33029, 33030 and 33031 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, are also dismissed. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09-12-2009 ks