IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19461 of 2011 Sunil Kumar & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 30.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioner no. 1 being the own brother of informant whereas petitioner no.2 being the wife of petitioner no.1 are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the petitioners by administering excess dose of medicines caused death of father and subsequently the mother was also killed by pressing her mouth. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that during investigation the case was found false to the effect that the victim was aged about 70 years old and died due to illness and his ritual was done at Basghat when all relatives participated and hence final form was submitted with recommendation of 2 prosecution of the informant then on protest cognizance has been taken. It is submitted that several litigations are going on between petitioner no.1 and the informant who is own brother and in partition suit the petitioners have been made defendants when the father expressed serious apprehension at the hands of informant. Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation, let the petitioners, Sunil Kumar and Karuna Sahay @ Karuna Devi, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1075 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)