1 WP-3249-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3249 OF 2009 Shri Mohan Narayan Kadam & Anr. ... Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Sandesh Patil, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the respondent No.1 - State. Mr. Samir Tambekar, Advocate, for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 25th April, 2011. P.C. 1. A report was lodged by the respondent No.2 - Sharad Jagannath. More against the petitioners and on that basis, Crime No.175/2009 was registered at Kalwa Police Station under sections 420, 467, 468 read with Sec. 34 of IPC. The petition was filed for quashing the said proceeding on the ground that after the said report was lodged, the matter was amicably settled between the parties. The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are present before the Court with their Advocates. 2. Mr. Tambekar, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, on instructions, concedes that after the said report was lodged, the parties have amicably settled the matter as per their agreement dated 5.7.2009 and the 2 WP-3249-09.sxw respondents Nos. 2 and 3 have received the amount which they had paid to the petitioners and therefore they have no objection to quash the proceedings. 3. The offence appears to have been registered on the basis of a dispute pertaining to the development of property and as that dispute has come to an end, in the interest of justice, with consent of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)