IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4362 of 2011 PINTU SINGH @ PINTU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.03.2011 Petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B, 201, 34 of the I.P.C. Admittedly the occurrence took place within seven years of the matter but it appears that the informant subsequently retracted from his initial version and considering the fact the other family members have been granted anticipatory bail. Since petitioner is the husband, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Let learned Court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner, considering the fact that informant has retracted from his initial version, if petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, provided that the informant will be one of the bailors. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)