IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.918 of 2007 Between: Samala Rajeshwari, W/o. Samala Mallesham, represented by her Power of Attorney Holder Samala Sadanandam, S/o. late Chennaiah, Aged about 43 years, Business, R/o. Shyampet village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. … Petitioner And Veldandi Kedari, S/o. Muthaiah, Aged about 55 years, Tailor, R/o.Girmajipet, beside Madipalli Veeranna Bunglow, JPN Road, Warangal and four others. … Respondents Order: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed aggrieved by the order dated 17- 01-2007, passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, in I.A.No.3308 of 2006 in O.S.No.1477 of 2003. The petitioner herein filed the aforesaid suit for declaration of title and mandatory injunction with regard to land admeasuring 290.80 sq. yards in Sy.No.17 of Shyampet village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District. Pending suit, she filed an interlocutory application in I.A.No.3308 of 2006 for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to inspect and preserve the physical features of the suit schedule property. The court below has dismissed the said I.A. Hence, the present revision petition. In this case, it is to be noticed that, earlier, the petitioner herein filed another suit for injunction, which ended in dismissal and confirmed in first appeal. Thereafter, she filed second appeal and obtained orders of status quo, which are in force. If the petitioner feels that any modification is required, it is open to her to seek directions pending second appeal, but independent of the same, she cannot seek any direction in the present suit for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to inspect and preserve the physical features of the suit schedule property. In the circumstances, I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the court below, which warrants interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate orders in the second appeal. No order as to costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. November 4, 2009 MRR