^- G^l^Q^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.//<^<OF 2010 PBTITIONER I;<y» RESPONDENTS o .. I^J^ ^. ^ L.<N<yy ^s--" \y \% (^' <^0'' ^^.'- ^.-- /.'T: 0<-" •f^'" . ^' ^, ..A \ w^ ^'^^r^ ^ ^ 1^^^ ^.M.sf Pardeshi, S/o Ghasiram, aged about 40 years, Caste-Sarthi, R/o Village Dataud, Gram Panchayat Dataud, Police Station 85 Tahsil-Jaijaipur, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS :1, 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sakti, District-Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Ghasiram, aged about 40 years, S/o Asharain, Caste-Lahare, (Election Petitioner) Manharanlal, aged about 40 years, S/o Ram Bharos Lahare, Dadulal, S/o Sonsai, aged about 35 years, Panchram, S/o Jhaduram, aged about 30 years, Caste-Satnami, Shivnandan, Satnami, S/o Bhojram Jawahar, S/o Pataitram, aged about 32 years, Caste-Satnami, 8. Sahadev, S/o Itwari, aged about 45 years, Caste-Satnanii, JL^ Respondent no. 2 to % are R/o R/o Village Dataud, Gram Panchayat Dataud, Police Station & Tahsil-Jaijaipur, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 9. Presiding Officer, Polling No. 20, ' ^ 10. Presiding Officer, PoUing No. 21 ^" 11. Presiding Officer, Polling No. 22 Fi >3- 12. Presiding Officer, Polling No. 23 ' 13. Presiding Officer, Polling No. 24 Respondent no. 9 to l^^through the Election Officer/Returnihg Officer, Block-Jaijaipur, District-Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •"wv*fs^ .^^r%.. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAIUB AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fC) N0. 4595 of2010 Petitioner Pardeshi. Versus The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti & Otliers. Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA ..d Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Ashok Present:- Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri AS.Kachhwaha, Dy. A. G. forlheState. ORDER(ORAL) (Passcd on 18th day ofAugust, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner, on iiistmctions., seeks permission oftiiis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to pravisions of law that may be available to the petitioner. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with fhe aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge