drp {1} Cri. Application No.306/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 306 OF 2011 Sanjay Sukhdeo Mahajan APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr.A.B.Girase, Advocate for the applicant Mr.D.V.Tele, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 24th February 2011 PER COURT: 1. This is second attempt of the applicant of seeking bail before this Court, after rejection of his earlier bail application vide order dated 04.03.2010. The present application is moved on two grounds, viz. firstly that when the earlier application was moved, the CA report was not available, which is now made available, which discloses that the blood group of the blood found on the clothes of the applicant is inconclusive and secondly that though the trial of Sessions Case No.173/2009 has commenced and two witnesses are examined after framing of the charge, yet there is no further progress in the Sessions Trial. drp {2} Cri. Application No.306/2011 2. Considering the possibility of tampering of prosecution witnesses, who are yet to be examined, it is not safe to release the applicant on bail when the trial has already commenced. When the Court expressed its view, learned counsel for the applicant not pressed for orders on merit, however requested for expeditious disposal of the trial, within a stipulated time. In the premise, the trial of Sessions Case No.173/2009 is expedited. Learned Sessions Judge, on whose file Sessions Case No.173/2009 is pending as part heard, is hereby directed to conduct the trial on day to day basis and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible and in any case on or before 30th April 2011.The applicant is directed to cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the trial. It is hereby made clear that this order is not passed on merits. The application is accordingly disposed of as rejected. Certified copy expedited. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln306-11