THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5800 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.32 of 2009 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of a premises bearing No. 8-2-41/1 of Khanapuram Village, Khammam Village and Mandal. Respondent No.3, on the other hand, filed O.S.No.312 of 2008 in the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam against the petitioner in respect of a plot admeasuring 366 square yards in Survey No.225/A of that Village. The respondents filed I.A.No.170 of 2009 under Section 10 read with Section 151 C.P.C. with a prayer to stay the trial of O.S.No.32 of 2009. It was pleaded that there is overlapping of the schedule in both the suits and O.S.No.32 of 2009 having been filed later in point of time; deserves to be stayed. The application was opposed by the petitioner. The trial Court allowed the I.A., through order, dated 19.08.2009. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. There is some dispute as to whether there is any overlapping as between the properties mentioned in the schedule of the respective suits. Be that as it may, the necessity to stay the trial in O.S.No.32 of 2009 has ceased to exist on account of the fact that O.S.No.312 of 2008 was transferred from the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Khammam. With that, both the suits are now pending trial in one and the same Court. The suits have to be clubbed and the order passed in I.A.No.170 of 2009 becomes redundant. Hence, the civil revision petition is allowed and the order under revision is set aside as infructuous. The learned Senior Civil Judge, Khammam shall club both the suits and dispose of the same, as early as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:20.07.2010 Note: Issue cc in one week. (B/o) kdl