THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 3494 OF 2008 O R D E R: The 1st respondent initiated steps for appointment of Anganwadi Worker for Neredgum village of Maganoor Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. The petitioner, 2 nd respondent, and certain others, submitted their applications. Interviews were held on 13.2.2008 and the 1st respondent appointed the 2nd respondent, as Anganwadi Worker, through proceedings dated 16.2.2008. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the same. She contends that the 2nd respondent does not hold the qualiﬁcations, equivalent to SSC, and that she does not know Telugu, to handle the children of the village. The 1st respondent ﬁled a counter aﬃdavit, stating that in the interview, the 2 nd respondent was awarded 4.8 marks, whereas the petitioner secured 4.5 marks. It is stated that the 2nd respondent has undergone education in Urdu, and the certiﬁcates held by her are equivalent to SSC and Intermediate, respectively. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare. Though the 2nd respondent is served with notice, she has not chosen to enter appearance. The petitioner raised two objections for the appointment of 2nd respondent. The ﬁrst is that the 2nd respondent does not hold the requisite qualiﬁcations, and the second is that she is not conversant with Telugu, the mother tongue of the villagers. Any ﬁnding on these aspects can be given, only after veriﬁcation of the record and on examination of the relevant orders issued by the Government, equating diﬀerent courses. The counter aﬃdavit discloses that the study undergone by the 2nd respondent is not the regular one. The certiﬁcates held by her were equated. It is also stated that the 2nd respondent knows three languages. This court is of the view that the matter can be examined in detail, by the District Collector, in case, the petitioner presents an appeal/representation. The District Collector can examine the matter from various angles, after issuing notice to the 2nd respondent, and after calling for the record from the 1st respondent. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to make a representation to the District Collector, pointing out her grievance, and the District Collector, in turn, shall pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of such representation. He shall issue notice to the 2nd respondent and give an opportunity of being heard. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ 29th August 2008 Note: Issue C.C. in three days. (B/0) PAN