IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2009 / 9TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26283 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MOHAMMED MUNEER.T.A., S/O.ABDULLA, AGED 42, PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT MANZIL ASSALAM, NAZARATH NAGAR P.O., THALANGARA-671 122, KASARGOD, KERALA AND NOW WORKING WITH QUATAR PETROLEUM IN THE ADDRESS HARD-DIV, POST BOX 50070, DOHA, QUATAR, REPRESENTED BY HIS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE AND PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER, SRI.GEORGE MORRIS, S/O.MORRIS, AGED 54 YEARS, PAYYAPPILLY,PACHALAM.P.O., COCHIN – 682 012. BY ADV. SRI.NELSON J.MANAYIL RESPONDENT: --------------- CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, COCHIN-682 011. BY SC SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.26283 of 2009-E = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks an order on the basis of the judgment in WP(C).25478/2006. He says that the building permit application had to be taken up for consideration for renewal in the light of that judgment. This is a matter that has to be taken care of by the respondent at the first instance. Accordingly, without prejudice to the contentions of both the parties, it is ordered that the request of the petitioner for building permit will be taken up, considered and disposed of in accordance with law by the respondent after hearing the petitioner. Let this be done at the earliest, at any rate, within an outer limit of one month. If the decision is against the interest of the petitioner, reasons shall also be stated so that he can work out his remedies WPC26283/09 -: 2 :- before the appropriate statutory authorities. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/09X09