IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2456 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2456 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO. 2456 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak & ... Petitioner Gr. Kamgar Union V/s. Security Guards Board for Greater.. Respondents Bombay & Thane Dist. & Ors. Ms. Vaishali Bhilare for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Topkar for respondent No. 1. Mr. P.B. Chavan i/b. Little & Co. for respondent No.2. Mr. O.P. Singh for respondent No. 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 28th November, 2006 : 28th November, 2006 : 28th November, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that though other unions of the respondent No. 2 are registered, the members of respondent No. 3, whose names are listed at Exhibit "A" are not registered. Our attention is also invited to resolution of the Government of Maharashtra dated 8th November, 2006 which directs the authorities set out therein including body like respondent No. 2 to engage guards from respondent No. 1. In the light of that, the following order :- ( 2 ) i. Respondent No. 1 to take steps to register within four weeks from today. ii. The guards whose names are listed at Exhibit "A" have already made application for registration, which is dated 11th October, 2006. The respondents to consider the same and take steps to register said guards according to law within eight weeks from today. 3. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]