THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION NO. 4739 OF 2008 ORDER: The petitioner has prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents not to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from house property bearing H.No.16-1-24/60/1, admeasuring 370 square yards situated at Saidabad Colony, Hyderabad. 2. It has been averred that the petitioner has been living in the said house and that he has purchased the said property under registered sale deed dated 29-07-1980 from G.Balaiah and predecessor of himself purchased the same in the year 1978 under the registered sale deed and that they also obtained permission for construction from the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad vide permit No.52/59/79, 20-09-1979 and thereafter, constructed the compound wall with structures there in. It has been averred that as the petitioner has purchased the said property for a valuable consideration, he cannot be dispossessed or evicted except in due course of law. 3. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents wherein it has been averred that as per pahanies of Saidabad village, Sy. No.32/2 is classified as Sarkari and grave yard. The plot of the petitioner falls under the aforementioned survey number. It has been averred that as per Town Survey Record, the land in Sy. No.32/2 is correlated to T.S.No.5, Block D, Ward No.171, situated in Saidabad colony, Saidabad village. The total extent of T.S. is 762 square meters and it is recorded as Sarkari in Col. Ni.’10’ and G-Grave yard in Col No.’20’ of the T.S.L.R. The respondent has further averred that the aforementioned land is being used as burial ground and that the petitioner with a mala fide intention to grab the Government land has created fictitious documents for the extent of 309 square meters and trying to construct a compound wall illegally and is also trying to encroach upon the Government land. 4. Keeping in view the fact that the land in dispute has been recorded as Sarkari and grave yard land, I find no merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel to the dismissal of the writ petition, the vacate petitions in W.V.M.P.(S.R.).Nos.41952 & 54354 of 2008 are allowed. Consequently, the status quo order dated 05-03-2008, passed in W.P.M.P.No.6241 of 2008 stands vacated. ______________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J DATE: 03.02.2011 kvr