IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.81 of 2010 KALPANA KUMARI @ KALPANA DEVI WIFE OF OM PRAKASH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – SIHMA, P.S. MATIHANI, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE BHAGALPUR RANGE, BHAGALPUR. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUNGER DIVISION, MUNGER. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BEGUSARAI. 6. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BEGUSARAI. ----------- 04. 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is alleged to be the mother- in-law of the deceased and an accused in Matihani P.S. Case No. 88 of 2008 registered for the alleged offences under Section 498A, 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that as a matter of fact, petitioner is not mother-in-law of the deceased and as such, he could not be made accused in the said case alleging the involvement of the mother-in-law. He further submits that during investigation, the fact of relationship of this petitioner with the deceased was not examined and police submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. He further submits that in the entire case diary there is no material against this petitioner to show that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the State submits that the investigation was done properly on the basis of the materials available and the charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Considering the rival submission of the parties, it is admitted position that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. However, it will be open for the petitioner to raise all his contentions available in law at the time of framing of the charge sheet. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)