IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 11 of 2009(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16453/2008 Dated 11/09/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SMT.NARAYANI, W/O.LATE KRISHNAN, AGED 70, THEKKEKALAM, KANNIMARI POST, PATTANCHERRY, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MURALEEDHARAN, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE ASST.ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION OFFICE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TATHAMANGALAM, CHITTUR, PALAKAKD DISTRICT. 2. ABDUL JALEEL, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KODUVAYUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB FOR R1 & R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- C.C.(C).NO.11 OF 2009 IN W.P.C. NO. 16453 OF 2008 H -------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th February, 2009 JUDGMENT Complaint of the petitioner is that contrary to the direction in the Judgment, which was based on the stand of the respondent that the line will be drawn only along the pathway, the post is put up in her property and the line is drawn across her property. A Counter Affidavit is filed by the first respondent, to which a Reply Affidavit also is filed. I do not think that I need to proceed with the contempt petition. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is dropped. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge