_j~ IN THE mGHCOURTOFCHHATnSGARH ATBILASPUR PETITIONERS ..<&^ ^•K^ Writ Petition N0.--^'—='—/2003 1. Dr. Liyakat Khaii, S/o. Shri Babu Khan, aged aboUt 47 years, R/o. MasterSahtd Mohalla, Distt.- Datia (M.P.) C/o. Shri Gautam Chand Jain, Vafaigaoii, P.0. Vahigaon Distt. - Bastar (Jagdalpur) ,-•''".cic^^ ,^°>" '<^-^ »'•"' RESPONDENTS 2. Dr. Ramprakash Saxena, S/o. Late Shri Ramcharan Lal Saxena, aged about53 years, Govt. Ayurved Aushdhalaya, Kopravelar, P.O.Velar, Tah.-Razim, Distt. Raipur (C.G.),R/o. C/o. NUesh Tiwari.Thanapara-Razun, P.0.- Razun,Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Union oflndia, Through the Secretary Department ofPersonal •and Traming, Ministry of Home affairs, New Delhi 2. State ofChhatdsgarh, Through Private Secretaiy Health Education Department, D.K.S. Bfaawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The State ofMadhya Pradesh, Through PrivateSecretary Healfh Education Department, VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 4. StateofChhattisgarh, Through Upper Sachiv Health & Fainily Wetfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) i^ki ^^ ^.feV^ RESPONDENT N0.2 9 RESPONDENT N0.3- ^ RESPONDENT N0.4- StateofC.G. through the Secre tary, Deparment of Health SsFamUy Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) State of M.P. through the Secre tary, Departmentof Healdth 8s Family Welfare, VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) StateofC.G. through the secre tary, Member State Advisory Commit tee D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.) | •—-—-?p~'~ 5. Commissioner, Indian System ofMedicine & Homoeopathic, Bhopal (M.P.) 6. Director, Indian System ofMedicine & Homoeopathic, Bhopal (M.P.) 7. Director, Indian System ofMedicme & Homoeopathic, Raipur(C.G.) 8. The Chainnan, State Advisory Coinmittee (State Re-organisation Cell) M.P. Govt., GA.D. Miiflftalaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) ^ ^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/ 2'27 OF THE CONSTTTUION OF DMDIA. {^S^tsSw" HIGH CQURT OF GHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR Sia^e Bench: HonTile Mr. Justiee Sfrtlsh K. Agnihotri. Writ Ptetition No.2493 of 2003 Petitioners Dr. Liyakat Khan and Others. Versus Respondents UiuonofIndiaandOthers Sm.t. Renu Kochar, eouiisel for fhe petitioners. Shri S.K. Beriwal, counselforUnionofIiidia/respondentNo.l. Shri Ftaikaj Shrivastava, panel lawyer for rcsporidents No. 2, 4 and7. None for ofher respondents. ^ ORALORDER ( 7ttl Februaiy, 2006) . 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioners subinits fhat petitioners, who are workmg as Doctorin fhe Health and FaaulyWelfare Departinent and are pennanent resideuts ofState of Madliya Pradesh. The petitioners have bcen allocated to fhe State of Chliattisgarh and fhcy waat fhcir reaUocation to fhe State of Madhya Pradesh. Leamed CDunsel for fhe petitioners, on instruction, subinifs that the petitioners be granted liberty to niake a representation to fhe rcspoudents/aufhorities for redressal of their grievances. Leamed counsel appcaring for the resppndents haye no objectiou to the said subinission. ^^s^sw"" ;Ari-SB" "^•R^^^ ISI: ::' ..:yft^iK' f": r 1 GJ: -•^ 1SI 2. In view ofthe foregoiag, fhe petition stends disposeddffinatty, witti liberty to fhe petitioners to make appropriate representation to tfae respondents/authorities conceraed, within a period oftwo weeks frcim today, and fhe respondents/aufhorities are directed to cousider and deeide the same, in an objective maimer, in accordance wifh. law, withia a period of eight weeks fiTQin the date of receipt of fhe representation, if any. Certified copy, as per rules. [• Sd/- SatishI<.Agiiyiom Judgc is ^s'^ tSSs IM uaa