IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 91 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2837 OF 2004 PRAKASH H. DUGAD ...PETITIONER V/S JOHNY JOSEPH & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS N.R. BUBUBNA FOR PETITIONERS. MS. A.R. JOSHI FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 4 BMC. P.G. SAWANT AGP FOR RESP. NO. 5/STATE. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 8th DATE : 8th DATE : 8th December,2006 December,2006 December,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The learned counsel for the respondents states that initially they have issued notice under the provisions of the B.M.C. Act but they have not received any reply to that notice. Thereafter the order under section 351 of the B.M.C. Act for demolition have also been passed and the papers are handed over to the concerned department for demolition, in case the occupant fails to demolish. In view of this, the order has been complied : 2 : with. The demolition will be completed within one week. Therefore, nothing survive in the contempt petition. The contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, if no action is taken by the B.M.C. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)