IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27714 of 2010 LALU MUKHIYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 30.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, petitioner and informant are co-villagers, but it is surprising enough that after alleged occurrence when informant gave written report to the Officer-in-charge of Andhra Math Police Station, the informant did not disclose the name of the petitioner. Subsequently, the looted motorcycle was recovered from the possession of one Satish Pandey. So the aforesaid circumstance clearly goes to show that neither petitioner is named in the F.I.R. nor nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Though, police has reported that petitioner carries criminal history but learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been granted bail in all most all the above stated cases. In the aforesaid circumstance petitioner, namely, Lalu Mukhiya, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani, in connection with Andhna Math P.S. Case No.63/2009 registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)