IKiSLE: S5-S £ //!// P. CS) No. 51 M\ /2009 ;T[TJ ^i..- ^^•^ ^•-^•"^-l' ^^". y<?!"A..-- \^"" ^' ^ •^•% §§'/' ^ Ma^ l./fe^h^.j S | K a°.i '<-^—^/^r •il??^ ~ /^'// '^vT^y ;NT( LalitaKashyap W/o Shri J. years, State ofChhattisgarh Caste, akward Class 2. Tl MataRukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, , Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSOARH : B'LASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDeNTS Smt. Lalita Kashvao Versus State of Chhattjsgarh & Others (Wrif petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri S.P. Kaie, counsst for ths petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer for fte State. 2. 3. Gowri (Passed on this 10tn day ofSeptember, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by She decision of ihis Court rendered in Smt. A. Laii v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others', thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representetion io decide her case in the Sight of afore-stated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No.3 fnstitute is a Govemment aided school and the petitioner is a teacher wthin the sanctioned strength. be Learned counse! appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representafion, the same wiii considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representstion. 4. in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appsaring for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, ths writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge '' WP No. 4106 or'2005 (decided on 6-2-2007)