IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2011 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 25718 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- E.D.MATHAI, EDAKKATTU HOUSE, NILAMBUR.R.S., RAMANKUTH P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN 676 505. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, PIN 676 505. 3. NILAMBUR MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN 679 329. ADV. SRI.PREVEEN.K.JOY SRI.P.VENUGOPAL (1086/92) FOR ADDL.R3 SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX TO W.P.C.No.25718 of 2011 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN W.P.C.NO.32042/2010 DATED 23/11/2010. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 26/8/2011. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/7/2011. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 28/7/2011. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G3/196/RTA/2011 DATED 9/11/2011 UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DATED 24/11/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL // True Copy// PA to Judge A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.25718 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by an autorickshaw driver challenging the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing fresh permits to autorickshaws in Nilambur town without obtaining a report as stated in Ext.P3. Ext.P3 is the proceedings of the R.T.O, Malappuram in which a decision has been taken to constitute a team to identify halting places for autorickshaws in order to give permits to additional 250 autorickshaws. According to the petitioner, when proceedings were taken under the Right to Information Act, the Secretary, Public Information Officer had given information that 250 permits were already issued and the parking spaces has not been identified. The learned counsel for the Municipality has produced a minutes of meeting dated 11/8/2011 contending that parking spaces have already been identified in Nilambur town for additional 250 autorickshaws. In view of the above, I do not think that any further order is required to be passed in the above writ petition. W.P.C.No.25718 of 2011 2 2. Hence the writ petition stands dismissed. If the petitioner has any grievance regarding further matters, it is open for him to challenge the same before the appropriate forum. (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr W.P.C.No.25718 of 2011 3 W.P.C.No.25718 of 2011 4 THOMAS.P.JOSEPH,J. Crl.M.C.No. of 200 ORDER 19/01/2011