1 ABA-94.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2011 Yashodabai Ashok Gaikwad .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri J.D. Mane for the Applicant. Shri Y.M. Nakhawa, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 21, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a mother whose son, serving as a Clerk in a treasury, has committed misappropriation. The learned APP, upon instructions from the I.O. who is present in the Court, states that a sum of Rs.11,00,000/- was credited in the savings bank account of the applicant. Out of the said amount, a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- has been withdrawn and therefore it is necessary for the police to trace where this amount has gone and therefore the police wants her custody and therefore he has a strong objection to the applicant being admitted to anticipatory bail. The applicant is present in 2 ABA-94.11 the Court. Now if a son has even used his mother's savings account unmindful of the fact that his mother would be subjected to investigation by the police, the mother cannot be blamed. In view of this, the interim order passed on 10-2-2011 is confirmed. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)