1979 of 1991 (Satish Kumar Mandbi Vs. State of Madhya Pradcsh and , another) praying for similar relief as sought for in this petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this case may also be disposed of in the same terms and condition. Shri Alok Bakhshi, learned eounsei appeaxing for the State/respondents ’ submits that the case of the petitioner would be considered in the light of the order of the SAT as aforestated, aftex' verifying the facts of the case. . In view of the foregoing and categorical statement made bythe learned counsel appearind for the State, tliis petition is allowed in the same terms i.e., if the Committee finds him suitable‘for the post in all respects, he shall be regularized on the post held by him and shall also pay him salary on regular scale. He shall be entitled to salary for the dates on break in sewice. His seniority shall be counted from the date Sahu g;er ~ ,»/,,, 4 . of his initial appointment. (1/. Satish K. Agniliotri Judge