IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2011 / 22ND POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20300 of 2010(J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. A.MURALIDHARAN,S/O.LATE SHRI C.APPUNAIR RESIDING AT NO.29, SAYEE NAGAR ANNEXE, FIRST MAIN ROAD, FIRST CROSS STREET, CHINMAYA NAGAR, VIRUGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI 600 092 2. A.HARIDASS, RESIDING AT NO.4/139 A 4TH MAIN ROAD, SRI AYYAPPA NAGAR CHINMAYA NAGAR, CHENNAI 600 092 BY SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI. JIBU P.THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER THE CHERPALCHERI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED NO.1696,CHERPALCHERI PO, PALAKKAD 679 503 ADV. SRI.V.K.BALACHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.20300/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE LEGAL HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, EGMORE NUNGAMBAKKAM TALUK, CHENNAI 31 DTD. 3.1.2007 AND TRANSLATION. P2:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT DTD. 11.1.2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.20300 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 12th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Complaining that the respondent is remaining inactive on Ext.P2 application made by the petitioners under Right to Information Act, this writ petition was filed. 2. Today when the matter came up for orders, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent submitted that petitioners have already filed O.S No.108/2007 on the file of Munsiff's Court Ottappalam in which Bank is the 5th defendant. It is submitted that in the written statement filed by the Bank, Bank has already furnished every information that is sought for by the petitioner in Ext.P2 application and that the suit is posted for trial on 13.1.2011. Thus, though not in response to Ext.P2 but through the pleadings filed in the suit, the information sought for by the petitioner in Ext.P2 have already been disclosed. Therefore, recording the submission of the learned counsel as above, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma W.P (C) No. 2010 2