IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH APRIL 2010 / 10TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 13547 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THANKACHAN, AGED 36 YEARS S/O.MATHAI, PLACKICHIRA VEEDU,PALLIPPURAM CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.KRISHNAN NAIR SRI.V.B.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHERTHALA POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA. 3. SRI.MANIKUTTAN, CONSTABLE CHERTHALA POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA. 4. JESSY, W/O.THANKACHAN THURUTHEZHATHU VEEDU, VALAMANGALAM, PALLIPPURAM CHERTHALA. 5. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 6. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, KOCHI. BY G.P.SRI.M.R.SABU ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE PASSPORT NO.E.9513705 OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CONTRACT OF APPOINTMENT SERVICE OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE EMPLOYMENT VISA OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO.549/04 FILED BY THE CHERTHALA POLICE. EXTP5: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CC NO.286/05 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS NO.1, CHERTHALA. // TRUE COPY // TKS P.N.RAVINDRAN & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.13547 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 30th April, 2010 JUDGMENT Ravindran, J. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after this writ petition was filed, the Police have returned his passport and that at present there is no interference from the Police Officers in the matrimonial dispute between him and the fourth respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in such circumstances, the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty with the petitioner to move this Court afresh if occasion arises in future. In the light of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty with the petitioner to move this Court afresh if occasion arises in future. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge K.SURENDRA MOHAN Judge TKS