THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32598 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent – Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, in not taking action on the third and fourth respondents based on her complaint, registered in Crime No.132 of 2008 on the file of Madannapet Police Station, as illegal and arbitrary. Petitioner is a complainant in the aforesaid crime. A perusal of the complaint indicates that primarily, the complaint was against the fifth respondent, who is stated to be co-sister of the petitioner, alleging that she absconded with the car of the petitioner and her whereabouts are not known, thus, she cheated her and the petitioner requested the police to take action. It appears, based on such complaint, investigation was conducted and final report was filed before the learned VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Thereupon, the learned Magistrate issued notice to the petitioner stating that if she is having objections to such final report, she could attend the Court on 28.08.2010. It is submitted that the said notice was served on the petitioner after expiry of notified date i.e. 28.08.2010. It is submitted that the complaint of the petitioner was investigated in correct lines is false and that the final report was prepared in collusion with respondents 3 and 4. The petitioner was already given an opportunity to file objections to the final report in Crime No.132 of 2008, by the learned Magistrate, as contemplated under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure. A copy of the final report is not placed on record and only the notice issued by the learned Magistrate is filed along with material papers. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the contents of the final report prepared under Section 173 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.132 of 2008, it is for the petitioner to file objections before the learned Magistrate. As much as the objections are to be filed by the petitioner before the learned Magistrate as contemplated under the Code of Criminal Procedure, this writ petition cannot be entertained at this stage to examine the pleas raised by the petitioner. As it is stated that the notice inviting objections to the final report in the aforesaid crime was received by the petitioner after expiry of notified date therein, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to file objections to the final report in the aforesaid crime before the learned VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. If such objections are filed, I am sure, the learned Magistrate will look into the matter and take steps in accordance with law. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th DECEMBER, 2010. kvni