IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.303 of 2008 LAXMI NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 21.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for quashing the FIR of Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 11 of 2008 instituted by respondent no. 6 the Block Development Officer at the instance of respondent no. 4 i.e. District Magistrate, Nawada giving under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is Block Education Extension Officer and he has issued the appointment letter pursuant to the letter dated 4.12.2006 bearing no. 7/Ni-3-02/06-2201 of Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, which is contained in Annexure-1 to this application. It is his further case that the matter relating to appointment of teachers was duly enquired by respondent no. 6. the Block Development Officer as per direction of the Superior Authority. The Block Development Officer in his inquiry did not find any - 2 - illegality or irregularity. He further submits that the instant case has been filed at instance of one Ramasharya Prasad a leader of a ruling party. The respondent no. 4 in his letter no. 260 dated 30.08.2008 has referred to certain irregularities in course of selection. It will be difficult for this Court to quash the FIR at this stage. It would open to the petitioner to make representation in respect of his being innocent before the I.O or the Superior Police Officers, bringing all such facts into their notice. With aforesaid observations writ application is disposed of. Kundan (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)