M.A, (Ci N0.42S of 2007 Nandkumar Singh, aged about 25 years, S/'o Sri I'yiuriidhar Sin.ah "Cast- Rajput, R/o Ankira, The.- Kunkuri, Dist- Jashpur(C.G.) Versus 1. Vljay Kumar Pats!, aged about 50 years, S/o Sunderlai Patei, Cast Aghariya R/o Vil. Tasiadih, Dist. Sundergarh (On'ssa) 2. Dinbandhu S/o Sri Khedu aged about 32 year, R/o Village, Alekera, Thana Sadar, Dist. Sundergarh (Orissa) 3. Branch Msnager, The New india insuranoe Company Ud. Tushar Market Colonv, First floor Hospital Road, Sundargarh (Orissa) A|3peaj underSection 173(2) o_rthe MotorVehjcleAci, issr Shri Akhilesh Kumar, counse! for the appeilant. on11° April,2S07) • The following ora! order of the Court \vas passed by H.L. Dattu, C-J. This appeal arises out of an avi/ard passed by the Motor Accideni Claims Tribunal, Jashpur 'sn C-ase No.32 of 2005, dated 23-01-2007. Learned Presiding Officer of the Tribunal after consideriRg the evidence on record has come to the conclusion that the appeHant has failed to pmve the nature of the injuries suffered by him and insp'te of this ths Isarned Presiding Officer has thought it fit to award a sum of Rs.41,797/- with approprlate interest to the appeHant, may be fciy taking a ver^ sympathetio attitude towards the appellant (2) It is expected of the appeilant to prove the injuries suffered by him by adducing orai and documentary evidsnce. [f he hss failed to prove the injurtes ^- befo.'e the Tribuna!, it cannot be he!d that the Tnbuna! has committed any error in passing the award on!y to the tune of Rs.41,797/-. (3) Having gone through the ordere passed by the Tribunal and also the evidence on record, we are of the firm opinlon that the Tribunal has not committed sny error whatsoever whlch would ca" for our Interference. !n vlew of the above, the appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordersd accordingly. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ~-'\