IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2010 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16449 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOHAMMED RAFEEK S/O. ISMAIL, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAYYIL HOUSE, P.O.ALAPRA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STAE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. TE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ARMED POLICE BATTALION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE COMMANDANT, BATTALION V, K.A.P. MANIYAR, PATHANAMTHITTA. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDNET OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 6. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERAPA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY SC SRI. ALEXANDXER THOMAS BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVIND BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.16449 OF 2010 (E) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he has been advised for being appointed as Police Constable. Vide Ext.P1 he is to undergo training under the 5th respondent which is to commence on 29.5.2010. According to the petitioner, on the ground that he was an accused in C.C.No.1162/2009 on the file of the Additional First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kanjirapally he is not likely to be admitted for training. It is further submitted that by judgment in Crl.M.C.No.907/2010 dated 29th March, 2010, this court has already quashed the proceedings in the aforesaid criminal case and therefore the reason of pendency of criminal case is totally without any basis. It is contended that he is entitled to be admitted for training. If as stated by the petitioner, the criminal case has been quashed by the judgment of this court and he is not involved in any other case, there is no reason why the petitioner shall not be admitted for training. WPC.No.16449 /2010 :2 : In view of this, I dispose of this writ petition directing that it will be open to the petitioner to produce a copy of the judgment before the 5th respondent, in which event it will be open to the 5th respondent to verify the matter and if he satisfied that apart from the crime case mentioned above, there is no other disqualifying matter, it is directed that the petitioner will be admitted for training. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 5th respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/