IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29360 of 2009 DINESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Complaint case under Section 406 of the Penal Code and Section 138 of the N. I. Act. The submission is that as per allegations the petitioner took a loan for purchase of a tempo which was promised to be returned. The cheque given in return has been dishonored. Section 138 of the N.I. Act is bailable. There is even no allegation that no tempo was purchased with the loan money. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 629/08. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)