IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11212 of 2009 Between: Sri Hukmichand Bhati S/o. Bansilal Bhati 15-8-476 Feelkhana,Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep.by its Commissioner Having Its Office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad 2 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep.by the Assistant City Planner Circle No. Hyderabad 3 Leeadhar Sharma S/o.Sri Purshottam Sharma 15-8-460/A Feelkhana Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.1&2 herein to take the necessary and immediate action as per law to prevent the illegal and unthorized construction of the Respondent No 3 in property bearing M.No. 15-8-460/A situated at Feelkhana, Hyderabad and also to demolish the illegal and unathorized construction which was already made in the said property by the Respondent No 3 herein in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 11212 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 13.4.2009 complaining about the illegal and unauthorized constructions being made by the 3rd respondent in the property bearing No.15-8-460/A, situated at Feelkhana, Hyderabad, as arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. Since, admittedly the petitioner’s representation/complaint was received in the office of the respondents 1 and 2 on 20.4.2009, the respondents 1 and 2 are bound to consider and make necessary enquiry into the allegations made by the petitioner. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation/complaint made by the petitioner dated 13.4.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity to the respondent No.3 to rebut the allegations. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. _______________ Justice G.Rohini Date:10.06.2009 mrb