^SViS. SSKti U!\^5^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G1 W.P. (S) N0. f ^ %3 OF 2011 PETITIONER ^c^ ./^ w^ l^^y €%^$^ ^y ^•' -^i- <"'<' Mohd. Mustafa Kamal Khan, aged about 32 years, S/o Late Mohd. Ismile Khan, Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Primary School Chachidand, Block Pratappur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^eS.KiW^^ /y^^?^, /§'/'^-) \'%\ f,.,? / ('es J [ S^ ks'aaSs |J^| .-•^J' y. °^ \, ('iS •T--\#S ^ ff'' :1. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department.D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Collector, Ambikapur, Sarguja (C.G.) 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pratappur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA 1.-' PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER Asitientioned in the cause title. --^ .•^ ••<..-"1":-' f.r /'! |,^5 ''%, V ^' ^ s^^^S4 Amit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION CS) No. 1383 of2011 PETITIONER : Mohd.MustafaKamalKhan. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF DMDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish ICAgnihotrL J, Present: Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 14th day ofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by the order ofthis Court in Prakash Kumar Das v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others . Thus, this petition may also be disposed ofin the same tenns. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed ofwith liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities to claim appointment on regular post in accordance with the policy of compassionate appointment. In case such representation is made, the concemed authority shall take decision expeditiously in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. W.P. No. 4303/2010, decided on 05.08.2010 ^yj s/5'' !k'-rl IK/V'_""'"_