IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.426 of 2011 ASHISH RANJAN SINGH @ AASHU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 20.06.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law, seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 25(1-B)A and Sections 26/35 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the F.I.R., he was found possessed with 05 live cartridges kept in a match box. It is submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and that he is in custody/remand home since 17.10.2010. Learned counsel further submits that in a related criminal case this Court has already released him on bail considering the fact that he is juvenile and that there is no criminal antecedent save and except two cases arising out of same occurrence. A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called for by this Court which is placed at Flag-‘A’. It has been reported that petitioner belongs to a well-knit family and that he does not carry any criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, while setting aside the impugned order(s), directs release of the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. case no. 276 of 2010, G.R. No. 1713 of 2010, subject to the following conditions:- 2 (i) One of the bailors shall be the father/ own brother of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the aforesaid bailor to monitor his conduct and to produce him before the Probation Officer, Jamui once in a fortnight for a period of 05 months from his date of release and also to produce before the Court as and when his personal appearance is required. In case of default in such appearance, the Probation Officer shall have liberty to communicate the Court about his non appearance as per terms of the present order whereafter the trial Court shall cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. (iii) During subsistency of the privilege of bail, if the petitioner has involved himself in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of the condition of bail entailing cancellation of bail. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )