W . ...Wm.aw¥4$ mzoo‘1 mm (WW) 3a W, WWI—er, W Wm ...................................................H1 . zoo mm(a§fmq> mmm wmm \ 3mmnv$aa§m Promotion Committeo WW#WW r%aif‘cmm w&_ d Annexure-Pj 10 dated 3~l 1-2003, h‘ decided til} date, Learned counsel for the petit disposed of with a. directien to the rc the petitioner and decide the same w Learned couneel {or resnondea petitiener files fresh representation thie petition aiong with a. copy of thi§ the same snail be considered and de( of 4 Weeks from the date of receipt of in View of the submissions instant oetition is disposed of Witt representation along with copy of th' ‘befora raspondent N02 Within a pe shall decide the same Within a for receipt of representation, in accordai i without considering the case of the petitioner. Rospondent No.2 vide order of Angakure—Pf/E dated 30*11 May, 2008 again a‘dowed higher pay scale to the juniors of the petitioner and the case of the oetitioner was not considered this time aiso. Theroafter respondents No.3 and 4, who are‘ junioro to the peti The gainst denial of higher pay scaie and against his super-session vide Annexure—P/E) dated 20-12-2001 and owever, representations have not been joner in the gradation {ist, were given regulaf nfofnofion vide order of Annexure‘P/S dated 24—9-2003. oetitioner has. been representing a oner submits that this petition may be :spondents to consider represen i thin specified period, its No.1 and ’2 submits that in case, the for redressal of his grievances raised in l petition and certified copy of this order, bided by respondent N042 within a period representation. hf learned oounsei for the parties, the i liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition and certified copy of this order ‘od of 10 days from today, who in tum her pen’od of 4 Weeks from the date of ice with iaw. Sdl— Dl-HRENDRA MISHRA ié Judge