IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2008 / 15TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 19150 of 2008(D) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- STARSON, S/O. KANDAMKULATHY JOHN, PARTNER GLITTER TEENS, ANANDAPURAM THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. THE DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THRISSUR, REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, CIVIL STATION, IRINJALAKUDA. 4. NANDAKUMAR, S/O. ELANTHOLY PARAMESWARAN, PULLUR VILLAGE DESOM PARTNER GLITTER TEENS AANANDPURAM, IRINJALAKUDA. 5. THOMSON MICHEAL, S/O. MICHEAL EDAKULATHOOR, IRINJALAKUDA VILLAGE DESOM PARTNER GLITTER TEENS AANANDAPURAM, IRINJALAKUDA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/10/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO. 19150/2008-D APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06/02/2008 IN W.P.(C). NO. 4323/2008. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE BALANCE STATEMENT OBTAINED FROM THE KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE CARD ISSUED FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P3(a): COPY OF THE LEGIBLE SCRIPT OF EXHIBIT P3. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/05/2008 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16/05/2008 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Rs/ V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO.19150 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT The writ petition was filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation and to extend the benefit of the package introduced by the Government for the protection and the benefit of Small scale Sick industrial units. The petitioner submits that the entire amount demanded was paid during the pendency of the writ petition. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P4 taking note of the fact that the petitioner has paid the entire amount as demanded. V. GIRI, JUDGE. pmn/ WPC.29729 /2008 2