IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5585 of 2008 Decided on: 28.09.2010 Devki Nandan. …Petitioner Versus Commissioner -cum-Secretary (Education) and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening development. Consequently, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 28, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?