IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1022 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19853/2009 Dated 15/07/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- KURUNIYAN ANWAR, S/O.SAIDU, P.O.MATTATHUR, OTHUKKUNGAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. MR.RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 42, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, OTHUKKUNGAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH. 2. MR.PADMANABHAN, AGED 52, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 3. MR.PREMJITH, AGED 38, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTAKKAL. 4. DEVADASAN.P., AGED 40, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, POOVATTUMPARAMBATH HOUSE, MATTATHUR P.O MALAPPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SRI.S.SREEDEV THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. Case(C).No.1022 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT In view of the order passed today in R.P.964/09, I do not find it necessary to issue any order in this contempt of court case since the materials placed on record in that review petition apparently tend to show that no case of willful negligence or default in obeying the judgment could be made out. No further orders are called for apart from that W.P(C).19853/09 is being considered de novo. This contempt of court case is, hence, closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.12/10.