IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 17652 of 2010 Date of Decision: 29.9.2010. Satya Prakash Sharma --Petitioner Versus U.H.B.V.N.L & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate present in the Court on behalf of Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner is aggrieved of the revised pension payment order dated 31.10.2007 and the consequential orders dated 5.12.07/31.12.2007/16.10.2009/9.9.2010 issued by the respondents. Vide the 1st order the revised pension payment order has been issued and vide the 2nd order (Annexure P-2) an amount of Rs. 56, 789/- is ordered to be recovered from the petitioner. Apart from other grounds the principle contention fo the petitioner is that the impugned order has been passed without affording any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Even from the impugned order it appears that no opportunity of personal hearing was afforded to the petitioner. CWP. No. 17652 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is allowed. Order Annexure P-2 is hereby quashed and matter is remitted back to the respondents to pass a fresh order, if, so desired after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 29.9.2010. lucky