IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.1042 of 2001 Date of decision: July 16, 2010 Lehna Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State (U.T.) and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T. A.N. Jindal, J This petition is directed against the order dated 20.3.2001 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh, dismissing the complaint and acquitting the accused-respondent. The allegations against the accused-respondent are that they had not implemented the award dated 1.5.1996 “re-instating the complainant but without back wages”. The records reveal that a letter dated 24.9.1996 was posted to Lehna Singh by way of registered post directing him to report for duty in compliance with the award passed by the Labour Court, but he did not join. The defence witness has categorically stated that after the receipt of the order, Lehna Singh was directed to join but he did not come forward. Thus, it appears that the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh has rightly held that in the circumstances, the Management of Piccadily Theatre could not be held responsible for not implementing the award dated 1.5.1996. The order of acquittal has been perused. The same is shorn of any irregularity much less illegality or perversity warranting interference by this Court. It it pertinent to mention here that the State has not filed any revision against the order. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. July 16, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge