- 1 - pil53.10 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 53 OF 2010 Ajay Jagdish Talreja .. Petitioner vs Slum Rehabilitation Authority & ors .. Respondents Mr. Om Prakash Pandey for petitioner Mr. J. G.Reddy for Respondent no.1 Mr. M. K.Upadhay for Respondent nos. 5 to 7. CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. AND GIRISH GODBOLE, J Thursday, 9th June, 2011 P.C. 1. The petitioner in this petition has challenged the S.R.A. scheme sanctioned by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority in respect of land bearing C.T.S.No. 386 (pt), 386/1 to 71 of Kasam Baug, Sukhtankar wadi, Malad (E) Mumbai mainly on the ground that the authority has permitted utilization of F.S.I. of land bearing C.T.S.No.387 for the purposes of the scheme on C.T.S. No.386 (pt) and 386/1 to 72. In the affidavit-in-reply filed by the Assistant Engineer of S.R.A. it is stated that the scheme sanctioned for C.T.S. No.386 is entirely different from the scheme for the land bearing C.T.S.No.387 and the same is reiterated by learned counsel for the S.R.A. In view of the above and also in view of the fact that the S.R.A. scheme on land bearing C.T.S.No.386 (pt) and 386/1 to 72 is - 2 - pil53.10 already completed and the same is already implemented and occupation certificate was also issued in the year 2006-07, we see no justification to entertain this P.I.L.of the year 2010. However, we make it clear that learned counsel for the S.R.A. as well as learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 to 7 has stated that the S.R.A. scheme in respect of C.T.S. No.386 has not utilized any F.S.I. Of C.T.S. No. 387. In view of the said statement and accepting the same and proceeding on that basis, we see no reason to entertain this petition. P.I.L. is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE GIRISH GODBOLE, J