..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2006 Sanjay Sitaram Khemka ...Petitioner. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. . . . Petitioner, party-in-person. Smt.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for the State. . . . CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : MAY 02, 2006. DATED : MAY 02, 2006. DATED : MAY 02, 2006. P.C.: . We heard the petitioner in person. He says that all the matters pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri, be transferred, as per Prayer (A). Prayer (A) is pertaining to four criminal cases and number of other criminal applications preferred by him. 2. He also prays that in the meantime that this Petition is heard and decided finally, direction should be given to the Magistrate not to hear his matters. ..(2).. 3. We are not satisfied with the submissions made by him. According to him one contempt petition being Contempt Petition No.20 of 2005, filed by him against the Magistrate, is pending before this Court since 2005. In the said petition, he has applied for interim stay before this Court. Even that prayer was not granted. Therefore, we are not inclined to accept his prayer. Therefore, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)