IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.557 of 2009 Malini Kumari, wife of Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, Resident of village P.O. Dardha, P.S.Goh, District Aurangabad Appellant Versus. 1. Indian Oil Corporation through General Manager, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Dakbanglow Road, Patna. 2. Senior Divisional Manager, Indian Oil Corporation, 3A, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbangalow Road, Patna. 3. Jitindra Kumar, Deputy Manager (Retail Sales), Indian Oil Corporation, 3A, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbangalow Road, Patna. Respondent 1st set 4. Atul Shekhar Singh @ Ram Pravesh Singh, son of Suraj Dayal Singh, resident of Goh, (Aditya Prakash Nursing Home), P.S.Goh, District Aurangabad. Respondent 2nd set ----------- For the Appellant : Mr.Sanjeev Ranjan,Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr.Anshay Bahadur Mathur,Advocate For Resp. Corporation : Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr.Amlesh Kumar Verma, Advocate. ---------- 10. 05.08.2011 When the matter has come up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the Indian Oil Corporation has submitted that in view of the policy decision taken by the Corporation to scrap the location with reference to allotment of petroleum retail outlet, the LPA has become infructuous. Respondent no.4 is the beneficiary of such advertisement issued in the year 2005 and it is submitted by the learned counsel for respondent Corporation that even though he was not issued the letter of intent he has purchased a land over which the outlet has to be located. It is also submitted that a direction be issued to the oil company to upgrade the Kisan Seva Kendra. This Court is of the opinion that as it is a policy matter, this Court cannot interfere with the policy matters, but, however, respondent no.4 may agitate his right before the appropriate 2 forum , if he so desires for upgradation of the Kisan Seva Kendra in accordance with law. Accordingly, the L.P.A. is disposed of as infructuous. chandran (T.Meena Kumari,J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)