IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 123 OF 2010 SHRI PANDURANG HARISCHANDRA TORASKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI ASHOK NAMDEV NAIK AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. M. G. S. Khandeparkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 11th February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rivonkar, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 14th January, 2010 passed by the District Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.169/2009 by which the appeal preferred against the order dated 15th December, 2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bicholim has been dismissed. 3. The petitioner is the original plaintiff in the Civil Suit No.59/2009/C pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bicholim who filed the suit for permanent injunction along with an application for temporary injunction. The trial Court upon appreciation of the materials placed by both the parties, dismissed the application. The lower appellate Court also dismissed the appeal confirming the finding of the trial Court. Perusal of the record discloses that the defendants/ respondents have been engaged by one Antonio Pereira, who claimed title to the suit property. Indisputably, the petitioner/ plaintiff has also filed suit against said Antonio Pereira and injunction sought against Antonio Pereira has been dismissed. 4. In view of the above position, I do not find any jurisdictional error having been committed by both the Courts below. In any case, this is not a fit case for exercise of supervisonary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence Writ Petition stands dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA