IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7935 of 2011+2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 1] WRIT PETITION NO. 7935 OF 2011 Ishwar Arun Koli .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents. --- Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. V.D. Rakh, AGP for respondent-State. Mr. S.S. Tope, Advocate for respondent No.2-Committee with 2] WRIT PETITION NO. 7563 OF 2011 Gajanan Shaligram Thakur .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Arun H. Koralkar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.B. Bhange, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent No.1. and 3] WRIT PETITION NO. 7564 OF 2011 Dinesh Ramesh Tahkur ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondents. -- Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. D.B. Bhange, Advocate for respondent No.2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7935 of 2011+2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 13TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2] The facts in the present petitions are identical with the facts in a bunch of writ petitions being W.P. No. 2136/2011 alongwith companion matters, that has been decided by this court vide order dated 25th August, 2011. 3] In the present case also, it is not in dispute that the claims of the present petitioners are pending before the Scrutiny Committee for considering validity of their case. It is also not in dispute that they have been duly selected by the respective competent authorities. By the aforesaid judgment and order, we have held that Condition No.7 in the Govt. Resolution dated dated 5.11.2009 is unreasonable and therefore, it was struck off. 4] We dispose of the present petitions, in terms of the operative order passed in the said judgment and order, which reads thus :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7935 of 2011+2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 “[i] Since it is not in dispute, that all the petitioners are duly selected against a post reserved for a particular category, we direct the Respondent-employers to forthwith issue provisional appointment orders in favour of the petitioners, which shall be subject to validation of their caste/tribe claims. The same shall be done within a period of one month from today. [ii] The respective Respondent-Scrutiny Committees are directed to decide the claims of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of six (6) months from today. [iii] It is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners on the ground of non-submission of validity certificate till the Respondent-Committees decide claim of the petitioners. [iv] It is further directed that in the event any order adverse to the interest of the petitioners are passed by the Respondent-Committees, the same shall not be given effect to, for a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of communication by the petitioners. Rule made absolute in above terms, with no orders as to costs. Sd/- Sd/- [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] arp/-