IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41464 of 2011 Jahida Khatoon, wife of Jahar Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.41534 of 2011 1. Veena Devi, wife of Lal Babu Bhagat 2. Rani Devi, wife of Madhvendra Singh 3. Ram Dulari Devi @ Ram Dulari Singh, wife of Ram Babu Singh 4. Gita Devi, wife of Sita Ram Thakur 5. Sundariya Devi, wife of Upendra Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.41590 of 2011 Chiranjeev Thakur, son of late Brahmdev Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.41594 of 2011 Shyam Babu Chaudhari @ Shyam Chaudhari, son of Jamun Choudhari Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.41653 of 2011 1. Raj Kumari Devi, wife of Shyam Kishore Gupta 2. Indal Rai, son of Late Munsif Rai 3. Milan Sah, son of late Mahendra Sah 4. Anwari Begum, wife of Md. Modasir 5. Shakuntla Devi, wife of Ramashray Rai 6. Kumkum Sinha, wife of Sanjay Kumar Sinha Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 09.12.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468/471 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 63, 65, 68 of the Copy Right Act. The accusation is that during raid in connection with Arms case it came to the light that some Dipendra Mishra along with co- accused Ashok Kumar used to supply duplicate solar lights to various Gram Panchayats without having VAT registration. The accusation is that the petitioners being Panchayat Mukhiyas used to direct for supply of solar lights from specific shop. It is submitted by senior counsel for the petitioners that purchase was made in pursuance to direction of the Deputy Development Commissioner whereby purchase was directed to be made from specific shop. It is further submitted that considering the similar accusation other Panchayat Mukhiyas have been granted bail, few web copies of the orders have been produced before this Court, let it be kept on record. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 595 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)