N ¥IIGH COURT OF JLm "URE CHPATI‘P W P. o Gig /2002 FE‘I‘ ITIONER M/s Ashok Khandelwal, A Eartnarshlg» hlrm T rough 1ts P rLner arag Dash; S o Blmln Dash; Age& abeut 36 years, R/e Ratnabandha R0ad,Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari (CG). VERSUS : 1)M.P. State Warehausing Corpn‘n Through its Managing Dircto r, office Cmnplex, Block 'A', Gautam Nagar, Bhapal (MP) . 2)Executive Engineer, M.P. State Warehousing Cargmu Office Complex Block-A, Cautam Nagar, Rhopal (MP) . RESPQNEENTS 3) Zonal Encineer, M.P Anand State Nagag w rehouSing Raipin; (CG). Cerpn” WRIT DnTITIOV UNDER ARTICLE 225 227 OF THE CONSTITUTWIE OF INDIA ’ ”T I I ’ ‘3‘ XI—HC-22 ‘ 2.4.2002 Shri Aad rithi nsel for e petitioner. wh Tpa co u th ' Heard. ’V Counsel for the per submits that the petitioner is titione entitied for eeeutin t wo alloted t him ad also for the o 1‘1ic th amount f Rs. 3,36,672/-wh has been withheld by e resondents. p Having onsied the cs and ciumstance the cse this cur is of the inio ta it wold be just anti roper to isue o o. “pr to a tld /s a directin t the etitione submit deaie epresentan along—wth opy f the petitio nnexure to he respo ts by registered pos with knowledgemen ue. On being de by th pion, he act d t s on e etiter t ren no s 1de h 1 eesetati of h titioer spondet 1 hall dec e prnon te pen as ea s posle refe y t a ped f to moths ily a s1b pia 1 Wihin ilo o w n m e r h y f~ reen l~ fro the dat of eceipt of t cop othe prestation aong th dm n ken y e with e necessary ocu ts. The decision ta b th xg he i‘yk t o n cder fat rcs of a ot opn ht u p rtio i Ithe c o n and as t n en \ t XI—HC-22 , W W, m, W straw ‘m mm FL 200 E, gm, c mm L Wm mqfm m manma mam? a?W W 311%?! WW ‘ respondents on the represenration of the petitioner, shall be communicated to him. \i/L If any adverse order is passed, the petitioner shall he at liberty to approach the apprqipriate forum for redressal of his ‘ grievance. With the observations made above the petitiOn is disposed of at this stage. ‘ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge r