IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1782 of 2006 RAM KUMAR SINGH PRESIDENT SCHOOL EDUCATION COMMITTEE GOVERNMENT OF PRIMARY SCHOOL, CHAKHAJI DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR SON OF RAM JIVAN SINGH AT PRESENT RESIDING AT VILLAGE + POST CHAKHAJI P.S. SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCE GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT CUM DISTRICT PROGRAMME CONVENOR “SARV SHIKSHA ABHIYAN” DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BLOCK SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CUM SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT SAMIT, RAJ RUP NARAYANPUR BELA, BLOCK SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 6. THE PRESIDENT SCHOOL EDUCATION COMMITTEE, GOVERNMENT PRIMARY SCHOOL RAGHUNATHPUR BELA DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. … RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioner: Mrs. Alka Verma, Advocate. For the State: M/s. Bhaskar Shankar, AC to GP-16. ----------- 3. 03.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the president of School Education Committee, Primary School Chak Haji Rup Narayanpur within Bela Block of Samastipur District. He has filed this writ petition praying inter alia to direct the 2 District Superintendent of Education Samastipur and Panchayat Samiti Bela Block in the District of Samastipur to consider the case of the Chak Haji Primary School for up-gradation as Middle School in the light of the instructions of the District Superintendent of Education cum Coordinator Mass Education Programme, Samastipur bearing letter no. 51 dated 22.8.2005, Annexure-3, addressed to all the Block Development Officers cum Secretary of the Panchayat Samiti in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. While considering the aforesaid matter, the District Superintendent of Education and the Secretary of the Panchayat Samiti may also consider the case of Respondent No.6 and find out whether Respondent No.6 fulfill the criteria for such upgradation and also pass reasoned order in that regard within the same time. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Ibrar/- ( V. N. Sinha, J.)