1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Criminal Application (BA) No.275/2011 ( Rajkumar @ Raju s/o Rajyya Jakku ..Vs.. The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S. Ballarshah, Distt. Chandrapur ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R.M. Daga, Adv. for applicant. Mr. N.R. Rode, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : M.N. GILANI J. DATE : 14.6.2011. The applicant/accused has filed this application for releasing him on bail against whom offences under Crime No.205/2010 is registered under section 143, 148, 149, 307, 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Incident occurred on 1/11/2010 near Star Bar Ballarsha, Chandrapur. One Jagdish Peddapalliwar, who is an injured in this case, picked up quarrel with some persons. Then the present applicant/accused and his other associates arrived on the spot and attacked Jagdish Peddapalliwar with weapons like sword, iron bars etc. As many as six injuries were found on the person of the victim. They were in the form of lacerated wounds, incise wounds, fracture etc. Injuries have been described as grievous. 2 Learned Additional Sessions Judge while dealing with bail application observed that the applicant/accused is involved in the serious offences and he, therefore, rejected the application. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the other co-accused have been released on bail and on the ground of parity the present applicant/accused may also be released on bail. According to him, the victim was discharged within two days of admission to the hospital. The perusal of the chargesheet shows that the attack was predetermined. After reaching to the spot the applicant/accused eqnuired about Jaggya i.e. injured. After ascertaining his identity they started assaulting him with dangerous weapons and caused him grievous injuries. The fact that the victim is discharged after two or three days would not dilute the gravity of charge. Considering the manner in which the offence was committed, weapons used and the grievous injuries sustained by victim, learned Sessions Judge was right in rejecting the bail application. I, therefore, do not find any substance to entertain this bail application. Bail application is therefore rejected. JUDGE Tambaskar.