1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition NO.1169/2009 Dr. Smt. Vanita w/o Madhukarrao Sardeshpande Vs. Recovery Officer, The Yavatmal Urban Coop. Bank Ltd. and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. Bade, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ DATED : 29th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard. Mr. Bade, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner points out that because of subsequent payment, respondents 1 and 2 have issued no due certificate and hence petitioner's grievance in the matter is already redressed. Mr. Pande, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 does not dispute this position. Shri S.K. Lawatkar, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4-auction purchaser states that it has paid huge amount to respondents 1 and 2 for purchase of property in public auction. As grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is disposed of with liberty to respondent no.4 to take such steps as are open to it in law. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.