IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 24575 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.9.2011 Gurnam Singh and another ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. H.P.S. Rahi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing notice of motion on 16.8.2011, the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that civil suit regarding the will which has allegedly been forged, was already pending when the present FIR was got registered regarding forgery of the will. The petitioners were marginal witnesses on the will.” Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the petitioners have joined the investigation. This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from SI Nirmal Singh. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioners are not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. Interim bail granted to the petitioners on 16.8.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 26.9.2011 Judge Meenu