IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.278 of 2008 Between: O.Srinivasa Rao, S/o Tirupathaiah, r/o H.No.10-428, Durjan Basti, Kothagudem, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.State Road Transport Corporation represented by its Divisional Manager (Rural) Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 The Asst.Traffic Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Pandit Nehru Bus station, Vijayawada,Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. M.V.VENU FOR MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the letter No.E1/122(2)/07-VJA dt.27-12-2007 issued by 1st respondent received by the petitioner on 28-12-2007 at about 6.00 p.m., and also action of the 2nd respondent in not allowing the petitioner to continue the licence work with effect from 28/29-12- 2007 (12.00 hrs.) mid night of 28-12-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.” At the hearing, Sri M.V.Venu, learned counsel representing Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni