HiGHCOURTOECHHATTIS©ARH:BILASPUR Writ Petitiori (S) No. 3S32 of 2008 .Petitloners ^ '-M 1) Patalu Ram Sao, S/o. Shri Sonu Ram Sao, age about 52 years, U. D.T, Mlddte SchooL Mahioi, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 2) s^ahesh Ram Rathiya; S/o. Shri Paras Ram Rathjya, age about 53 years, U. D.T , Middie :Schooi, Hamjrpur,.DIstt. Raigarh (CG). , 3) Smt. Rajni Panda, S/o. Shri S.K. Panda, • age about 51 years, U.D.T., Middie Schooi, Kanya Ashram, Gordhl, Distt. Ralgarh (CG), 4) RamdayajSaG,S/o.ShriBa[aramSao,A98 about 53 years, Asstt. Teaotier, Primary .SGhooE,.Bhagora, Dlstf.RaIgarh (CG). 5) Ku. Pakaia Thakur, S/o, Shri Kamai Nai,. Age about 51 years, U.D.T, Kanya Mlddie Schooi, Tamnar, Dlstt. Rajgsrh (CG). 6) P.N. Meher, S/o. Shri Jara Ram Meher, Age abput 52 years, U.D.T.,- Mlcfdte- Schooj, Bhagora, Distt. Raigarh(CG). 7) Jaymangal.Patei, S/o. Shri S.K. Patei, Age -about 51 years, U.D.T., iVfiddle Schoo!, Samkera, Di.stt. Raigarh (CG). • - • 8) Manboth Khandalt, S/o. Shri S.siukru Ram Khanda.it Age abotrt 51 yea^ U,,D,T:, Hr. Sec. Schooi, Mahtol, Distt. Raigarh (CG)., 9) Khageshwar Patel, S/o. Snri Rupdhar Pa.te!, Age about 47'years, Asstt..Teacher, .Primary SchooS, Hamjrpur, ;Dlstt. Ralgarh (CG). .. 10) Deenbandhu Sidar, S/o. Shri Kirit Ram .. Siciar, Age about 50: years, U.D.T., Mlddje Schooi, Kodkei, Di'stt. Raigarh (CG). 11) Ramjai Bhoi, S/o. Shri Bairagi Bhoi, Age about49years,U.D.T., Hr. Sec. School, Tamnar, Dlstt. Raigarh (CG). 12) Jay Ram Bh'agat, S/o. Shri Pandu Bhagat, Age about 56 years,.U.D.T., Hr Sec. Schoof, Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (CG). • " .•': 13) Nehru Lai Sharma, S/6; 'Shri.Krishn Chand Sharma, age about 52 years, uDJT., Middie Schoo!,- Daregaon, Distt. Raigarh (CG). - 14) Sahas Ram Choudhari, S/o. Shri J.P. Choudhari, Age ^bout 51 years, U, D.T; ;Mlddte. Schoo!, Bajrmuda, Distt.. Ralgarh 15) B. R. Bhagat S/o. Shri F. R. Bhagat, Age .about 52'years, U.D.T., Middie Schoo!, . •B^armuda, Dlstt. RaiQarh (CG); 16) Dhani Ram Patei, S/o. Shri Bhesh Ram Patel, Age about 57 years, U.DT., Middle .Sohool,. Tangarghat,..'Distt. .Raigarh (CG). ^ '^^ Resoondents 17) Rupdhar Gupta, S/o. Shri Jarman Gupta, Age about 36 years, Asstt Teacher, Mlddte Sohoai, Hamlrpur, Distt. Ralgarh (CG). 18) Janmjay Choudhan, S/o. Shri Anand Ram Choukdhan, Age aboirt 52 ye^rs, LID.T, Hr. Sec. Schooi, jVlahjol, Dlstfc Ralgarh Versys 1) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Educaticn & Tribal Department, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur .(CG). 2) District EQ'ucation Officer, Distt. Raigarh (CG). (VVrit Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of Endia.) SB: Hon^bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Preseiit: Shri Somkant Verma, coynsei for the petrtjcner^. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advooate Generat fortheState. 'r ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17th day ofJuly, 2008) With consent of iearned counsei appearing for the parties, {he matter is heard finally. ^ 2) Learned cour$sei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers in 1977 on a fixed pay scale of Rs.100/- for a period of tv^o years. After compietion of two years probation, the petitsoners were granted reguiar pay scaie. He further submits that the issue invoived in the case is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to reguiar pay soaie with effeot from the date of initlal appointment or after completion of probation period. 3) The issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/89 ( Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs State of M.P. & others); wherein it was held that the simifariy situated teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of inttiai appointment. Tne matter was taken up to the Hon3bie Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court, uphoiding the decision of the Tribunai to the efFect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitied to regular pay scaie from date of inltiai appointmerrt. s- 4) in view of the above stated submisslons made by iearned counse! for the parties, the writ petition is dlsposed of in the same terms l.e., the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider the petiticners? pase, if they stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-8-1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative TribunaS, Jabaipur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 uviadhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequentiy confirmej by crder dated 3-1-1994 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Speolal Leave Petition (Civii) No. 6892/93 and grant relief accordingty. 5) in view of foregoing, the petitlon is disposed of. No order as to oogts. Raju Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge