IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25325 of 2010 AMIN PRASAD @ AMIR PRASAD S/O KISUN PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 324, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of one month nine days the petitioner has remained in custody since 26.10.2009, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran in S.Tr.No.731 of 2009 arising out of Pipra Kothi P.S.case No.2 of 1996, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors shall be the father/brother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do - 2 - so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of nine months in view of the fact that the occurrence is of the year 1996. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )