IN THE HIGH COURT 0% MADHYA PRADESH ATaJABALPUR a ( ‘ a» mawo-mlJlwlywigm . CF0000111881 PETITIONERs ’ \1. R.C.Chowda s/o Chhota Bhai agga 52 years, R/o Moti Talab Pa;é%; vJagdalpur°\¢? B.R.Kapoor S/o K,R%Kapoor, ageé about 50‘years, R/o Moti Talab para, Jabéalpur.’, —V€rSU.S-' State of M.P. through,5ecretary Transport Vallabh Bhavan, Bhogél, Regional Transport Commissioner Bhopal. RESPONDENTS ~: 1. y' f 'Regional Transport dfficer $113. Bastar Division Jagdalpur. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THEJCONSTITUTION/ OF INDIA § g \ (E§ HEGH (3(3UE’I 0:1: CHHATTE$$ARE AT EELASPUR $ingie aench : Hcrg’bie $‘nri H.L. Datiu, ad. Wait P&t§€i9n Nc.132’§ Q? é§§1 ?ETE?EONER$ 1. RC. Chowda 8/0 Chhata Bhai aged 52 years. Rio Mati Talab Para; Jagdamur. ' 2. BR Kapoor S/o KR. Kapoor, aged about 5D years, RIO Mo’ti Talab para, Jagdalpur. Vs. W $PQN§E§§‘§'# 1, 8tate of MP. through Secretary Transpcrt Vaiiabh Bhavan, Bhepal 1 2. Regicnai Tranepod commissioner Bhopai 3. Regime! Transport Officer Baetar Divisian Jago‘1apur. Deririan under Africie 226 and 22? of the Constitution oi india. N :e for ihe petitioners, GWAL 0R$ER {?assed or: 4E May. 2m?) When the case was oaiied out for hearing, none appeared nor any reoresentation was made on behair’of the peiitiomere. The petitioners may not be interested in the matter. Therefore, this writ peiition is rejected for non— prosecution. {2) Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the petitioners forthwith. (3) Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to make appropriate appiication. iHhey so desire, seeking revival of the writ petition. Ordered i":‘\ acoordirigiy. t \W i i Sd/ ‘ ti mef Jusnlce