IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8042 of 2009 BALISTER CHAUDHARY @ BAIRESTER CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 17.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that having similar allegation one of the accused persons Wakil Chaudhary has been allowed bail vide Cr.Misc.no. 21398 of 2007and five others namely Badri Chaudhary, Jhotil Chaudhary, Prabhawati Chaudhary, Jai Narayan Chaudhary and Ramchandra Chaudhary have been acquitted after trial. So there can be no justification to arrest the petitioner for similar allegation. I agree with the submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Shikarpur P.S.Case No.247 of 2005, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI