IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43907 of 2009 UDAY KUMAR @ UDAY, SON OF SHRI WAKIL SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-ADARSH COLONY, BAULIA ROAD, SASARAM, POLICE STATION-SASARAM(T), DISTRICT-ROHTAS………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 14.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 384 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that it is apparent from the seizure list that the goods were seized from the godown of one Dev Roadways. The goods seized has already been released in favour of the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2009. It was submitted on behalf of the State, that the petitioner, who was ex-employee of the informant, intentionally and with criminal intent, had unloaded the truck at Sasarm which was booked for Giridih and 2 whereafter police raided the spot where it was unloaded and seized the materials. Considering the fact that the petitioner, who was ex-employee of the informant, got the entire goods unloaded from the concerned truck at Sasaram which were booked for Giridih and the petitioner is in custody only since 23.11.2009, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner for the present. As a result, this application is dismissed at this stage. However, it would be open for the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail, if so advised, after completion of six months in custody. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)