IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6751/2010 Chandra Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 27/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Govind Chaudhary for accused petitioner Mr. Amit Poonia,Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the FIR has been registered against the petitioner only for offence under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. Statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which she has stated that she went with the petitioner out of her free will and ultimately returned back to her parents. There is no previous criminal case against the petitioner. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. However, he does not dispute the submissions made above. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Chandra Prakash S/O Shri Badri Lal shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 404/2010 of P.S. Vigyan Nagar, Kota City, Kota on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi