IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTAL STAY APPLICATION NO. 4521 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2008 Mohan Singh & another ………..Petitioner Versus Staff of Uttarakhand & two others ……….Respondents Dated: 22 nd July, 2008 Hon’ble Prafulla, C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri R.S. Sammal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Tanuj Semwal, leaned AGA for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the First Information Report dated 11.07.2008 which is registered as Crime No.2/2008, relating to the offences punishable under Sections 304-B & 498-A I.P.C. Patti Talla, Kanda, Dhari, District Nainital. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that Petitioner No. 1 is brother-in-law of the deceased who was living at Lucknow on the date of the incident alleged to have taken place in the house of husband of daughter of the complainant. It is further pointed out that Petitioner No.2. is mother-in-law. Having herd learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the First Information Report, which contains serious allegations against the in-laws, we are not inclined to interfere with the investigation, in exercise of our Jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the Petitioner No.1-Mohan Singh is arrested or surrenders before the court concerned his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No.4521/2008 is disposed of). (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 22.07.2008 Arti