IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2011 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 169 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JENNY PAPPACHAN, AGED 23 YEARS, PANAKKAL HOUSE, KALADY .O., MATTOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 574. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SUBRAMANIYAN, SREEMURUGA BHAVANAM, KATTITHARA PARAMBU ROAD, EDAKOCHI - ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 006. 2. GEETHA, W/O. SUBRAMANIYAN, SREEMURUGA BHAVANAM, KATTITHARA PARAMBU ROAD, EDAKOCHI - ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 006. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, FORT KOCHI - 682 001. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATTANCHERRY - 682 003. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EDAKOCHI POLICE STATION. PIN - 682 004. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI C M KAMAPPU FOR R3-5 ADV. SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN FOR R1 &2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No. 169 of 2011 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT Joseph J., The petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus for the production of his wife. According to the petitioner, he has married the alleged detenue and it is evidenced by Ext.P3 certificate. 2. We have passed order in 30.3.2011. We had noted from the statement of the alleged detenue that there is no illegal detention, but we could gather is that she is undecided as to what she should do. We felt that the matter required further consideration. Accordingly we posted this case for today. We have permitted the detenue to go with her parents. 3. Today when the matter was came up, the alleged detenue, her parents and the petitioner were present. We also heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The alleged detenue W.P.(Crl.) No. 169 of 2011 :2: would say today that her parents are agreeable in the alleged detenue going with the petitioner. Her parents also would say that they have no objection in the alleged detenue going with the petitioner. 4. In such circumstances, we close the Writ Petition allowing the alleged detenue to go with the petitioner. K.M. JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/