CWP No. 9573 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9573 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: May 27, 2011 Narinder Singh Mann .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others .......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner did not give any power of attorney to respondent no. 5. Power of attorney was given to respondent no. 4 which, however, was cancelled vide Cancellation Deed of General power of Attorney-Annexure P-2. Despite such facts, respondent no. 5, acting as sub attorney under respondent no. 4, has represented the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel contends that the fact has been brought to the notice of the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jalandhar. No response thereto, however, has been received. 3. In the perception of the Court, if the petitioner had not given any power of attorney to respondent no. 5, or had cancelled the power of attorney in favour of respondent no. 4, it would be an important circumstance to be considered by the authority. I find that the petitioner prima facie has a right to decision on representation/objections Annexure P- 5. CWP No. 9573 of 2011 2 4. This petition is disposed of with directions to Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jalandhar to deal with Annexure P-5, the objections and pass appropriate orders as required by law within a period of 90 days of receipt of certified copy of the order. Before passing a reasoned order, the petitioner would be given an opportunity of hearing. 27.05.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE