IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9810 of 2010 1. MUNNA SINGH SON OF LATE RAJBALLABH SINGH 2. SAHDEO SINGH SON OF SRI PARMESHWAR SINGH 3. KAPIL SINGH SON OF SRI PARMESHWAR SINGH 4. BALESHWAR SINGH @ MUNSHI JEE @ MUNESHWAR SINGH SON OF SRI PARMESHWAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the State and the informant. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the occurrence took place on account of a bonafide land dispute in which the petitioners participated as one of the seventeen persons named in the F.I.R. along with 8-10 unknown persons, but there is no specific overt-act against the petitioners and the antecedents of the petitioners have been well explained, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 20.11.2009 and 26.11.2009 respectively, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in Didarganj P.S.case No.167 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court - 2 - concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. In case there is any complaint against the petitioners of tampering with the evidence, the court shall hold proper enquiry in the matter. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )