05. 04.07.2018 Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the O.P. No.7 being the vendor of the petitioner, there is no need of substitution vice O.P. No.7. Learned ASC, on the other hand, submits that, fraud having been alleged against the O.P. No.7 in obtaining the lease, the O.P. No.7 is a necessary party. Substitution vice O.P. No.7 is dispensed with at the risk of the petitioner. A memo to that effect be filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in course of the day. List this matter six weeks after. Counter be filed in the meantime. …………………………. C.R. Dash, J. …………………………. Subha J.P. Das, J. W.P.(C) NO.9811 OF 2015