IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2010 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 1448 of 2010(E) PETITIONER(S): REENA ANTONY, W/O.P.V.BABU, AGED 38 YEARS, (HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ST.GEORGE'S HIGH SCHOOL PUTHENPALLY) RESIDING AT PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, OLANAD, VARAPPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM - 14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, ST.GEORGE'S HIGH SCHOOL, PUTHENPALLY (VIA) VARAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. THE HEADMASTER, ST.GEORGE'S HIGH SCHOOL, PUTHENPALLY (VIA) VARAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. SMT.JISSY JOSEPH, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT ST.GEORGE'S HIGH SCHOOL, PUTHENPALLY (VIA) VARAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI FOR R7 SRI. MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI. DEEPU LAL MOHAN GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C. NO. 1448/2010. ------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 COPY OF ORDER DT. 1-6-2009. EXT.P2 ORDER DT. 10-8-2009. EXT.P3 ORDER DT. 26-9-2009. EXT.P4 JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 29740/2009. EXT.P5 ORDER DT. 4-1-2010. EXT.P6 LETTER DT. 12-1-2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: --------------------------------------- EXT.R7(1) REVISION PETITION DT. 15-1-2010. EXT.R7(2) GOVT. ORDER DT. 17-6-2005. TRUE COPY P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 1448 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 5th day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has obtained Exts.P2, P3, P5 and P6 orders for appointment in a vacancy which has arisen in the 5th respondent's school in recognition of her claim under Rule 51A of Chapter XIVA of the KER as against the claim of the 7th respondent under Rule 43. The petitioner has filed this writ petition complaining that those order are not being implemented by the 5th respondent manager. 2. The manager has filed a counter affidavit stating that the 7th respondent has filed a revision petition in the matter and therefore he is awaiting orders in the revision petition. He further submits that the temporary vacancy to which the petitioner seeks appointment does not any longer exist and the petitioner has been accommodated in another temporary vacancy on daily wages. In the above circumstances, the petitioner confines her relief for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. R7(1) revision petition filed by the 7th respondent before the 1st respondent. Having heard both parties, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. R7 (1) revision petition stated to have been filed by the 7th respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/