IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1594 of 2007 BINOD KUMAR SHARMA Versus SHYAM SUNDER PD.AGRAWAL @ SHYAM SUNDER AGRAWAL ----------- 2. 8.12.2008 In view of the fact that the plaintiff was given sufficient accommodation from 7th April, 2004 to 3rd August, 2006, as noted in paragraph 7 of the civil revision application, and evidence of the defendant- petitioner was closed within a span of almost nine months, the interest of justice would be better served if the two witnesses of the petitioner, as specifically stated in paragraph 8 of the civil revision application, are allowed to be examined. That being so, this Court would set aside the impugned order and direct the court below to allow the petitioner to adduce evidence of his two witnesses within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation, this application is allowed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/