IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.591 OF 2011 Between : Gurram Narayana Swamy ...PETITIONER A N D Marisetty Laxmamma and others …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.591 OF 2011 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 02.02.2011 in I.A.No.1024 of 2010 in O.S.No.71 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Anantapur, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the suit schedule locality and fix up the boundary lines of the sub-divisions by fixing survey stones, was allowed. 2. By virtue of impugned order, the Advocate Commissioner was appointed to inspect the suit schedule locality and fix up the boundary lines of the sub-divisions by fixing survey stones. The suit was filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs for declaration of title and possession in respect of the land in survey No.547-1A, measuring Ac. 1.50 cents out of Ac.10.72 cents with specific boundaries; East:Road; West:Land of D.Nagappa; North:Road; South: Land of Vajje Mallesappa. 3. The respondents/defendants filed a written statement in the trial Court, wherein they have stated that they have no objection for confirmation of sub-divisions and for due completion of all the formalities by properly fixing up survey stones missing if any. Therefore, the plaintiffs can approach the revenue officials who will be having all the records and they can fix the boundary lines of sub divisions by fixing survey stones. The property of plaintiffs can be duly identified. The defendants agreed for the relief sought for by plaintiffs, appointment of Commissioner may not be necessary. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed setting aside the impugned order, dated 02.02.2011 in I.A.No.1024 of 2010 in O.S.No.71 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Anantapur. It is made clear that if the Advocate Commissioner files any report before the Court below, the same cannot be taken into consideration in view of the fact that the impugned order itself is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J MARCH 22, 2011. YVL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5270 OF 2009 MARCH 01, 2011