THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.18168 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner states that the 2nd respondent is undertaking on line business without any specific permission and licences, and is misleading the people. His grievance is that the 1st respondent and his subordinates are not taking any action against the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent filed a counter affidavit, stating that it has obtained permissions from various authorities, such as the Department of Commercial Taxes, Ayush, Governmnet of A.P., Income Tax etc. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. The petitioner is under the impression that the 2nd respondent did not obtain necessary permission from the concerned authorities and it is undertaking on line business. The 2nd respondent has enclosed copies of registration certificates from various Departments. Even assuming that the said certificates do not permit the 2nd respondent to conduct the nature of business being undertaken by it, it shall always be open either to the petitioner or to the affected citizens to institute proceedings. On the basis of vague and general allegations, the 1st respondent cannot be directed to proceed against the 2nd respondent. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that in case, it is evident that the 2nd respondent is undertaking any business or other activities contrary to law, it shall be open to the petitioner to bring the same to the notice of the concerned authorities. This order shall not be construed as conferring any right on the 2nd respondent to undertake any business, except in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 26.02.2010 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.18168 OF 2009 Date: 26.02.2010 JSU