IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7079 of 2005 BACHCHU PRASAD, SON OF LATE PRABHU LAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BAR, P.S. – SHERGHATI, DISTIRCT – GAYA. ….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, SASARAM BHABHUA CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. SASARAM. 2. THE SASARAM BHABUA CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., SASARAM THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SASARAM BHABUA CENTRAL CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD. SASARAM, DISTRICT – ROHTAS. …… RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 17.3.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner informed the court that after retirement without any proper notice or enquiry an order of forfeiture of pension has been passed by the respondents. The said order is now a matter of challenge in C.W.J.C. No. 7305 of 2006. In view of the above development, the present writ application has lost its meaning. Needless to say that if the petitioner succeeds in the above mentioned writ application then the consequential orders will accrue in his favour with regard to payment of pension. This writ application stands dismissed as infructuous with the above observation. DKS/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)