IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 1232 of 2009(A) ---------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- K.VASAVAN,S/O.CHANDU,RESIDING AT "VALSALYAM",PILANHI, MAKRERI.P.O,KANNUR DISTRICT, (WATCHMAN,KWA,KANNUR SUB-DIVISION). BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION & WATER SUPPLY SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,JALA BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,P.H.DIVISION,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEAER SMT ANU SIVARAMAN SC SRI. UUNIKRISHNAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.1232 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 32049 OF 2009 (A) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009 O R D E R The writ petition was dismissed by judgment dated 10th November, 2009 taking note of the averments in the writ petition that the petitioner's service was dispensed way back in 1987. It is now stated that since 15.12.2005, petitioner is working on daily wages. This factual statement was not available in the writ petition and therefore the judgment was rendered without taking note of this factual aspect. For this reason, I am satisfied that the judgment is vitiated for an error apparent on the face of it and therefore the review is allowed and the judgment is recalled. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :