IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28895 of 2010 RAM PRATAP SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 6.8.2010 This application has been filed for restoration of Cr. Revision No. 561 of 2009 which stood rejected on 31.5.2010 for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 17.5.2010 by which two weeks’ time was allowed to the petitioners to take steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party nos. 7 and 8 with correct and present address under both processes. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners were under the impression that two weeks’ time after summer vacation was granted to file requisites for issuance of notice and as such requisites for issuance of notice under both processes was filed on 24.6.2010 although time granted was expired on 31.5.2010. As such, a prayer has been made to restore Cr.Revision no. 561 of 2009 to its original file after accepting the requisites filed in the office by the petitioners. In view of submissions made in the restoration application, the same is allowed and 2 Cr. Revision no. 561 of 2009 is restored to its original file. Let necessary requisites under both processes if filed in the office by the petitioners for issuance of notice upon opposite party nos. 7 and 8 be accepted. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)