^ W-i'&"^^§ c-»?yf;| S K£:'?tlj G o. & .\C3d L- IN THE HIGH COURT OE CHHATTISGARH JUDIGATURE^T B ASPURfC.G.V W.P.fq N0. 133^> /2009 /"Manoj Kumar Thakre, S/o- Shri Surendra Rao Thakre, Aged about 28 years, R/o- Village-Ammurra, Presently working as Sarpanch Gram Panchayat-Ammurra, Janpad Panchayat-Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS •2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through-SeGretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Director, Panchayat, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. B-? ^....-••^n"', b&^-7-^—"""^'"^'1 Et.W.--^T"&^t:?--3-""" ^^^£i^--""--"- ^ ^•5. Collector/Additional CQllector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh Chhattisgarh. Sub-Divisional Officer (R), (Prescribed Authority) Sarangarh, Distt. Raigath, Chhattisgarh; The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat-Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh. C.G. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITIONUNDERAdfTICLE 226/227 OF THE ' CQNSTlTUTION'OFrNDtA-1 ' m ...I! Versus .State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRITPETITIQN UNDERARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTiON OF IND!A ShriPanRajSnnvastava.AdvQcateforthepetitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer fbr the State/ respondents No.1 to 4 Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Advocate for the respondent No.5. :'- ..•.1::-:^;--. .^''^^^ .::•., : 1:,.- .' .' l'. i,.x 3. 4. (Passed on'iO"'clayol;Noven3ber,201p5 • , Learned counsei appearing fortftspetitionerseekspermission of thisCourttowithclraw'thiSipefitionontrtegroundthatthepetition hasbeGomelnfructuous.' " ig for other side have no o -ltis.ordered,,asprayedfor. . : • 1 . • • . ;AGcordingly,i;thewntRetitionjsdisniissedaswitlidra Sd/- i Satish K. Agnihotni Judge L ;asndk