1 Cri-A-117-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2011 Lalit Kumar Poonamchand Mandot ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ashish Sawant,Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs. G.P.Mulekar, APP, for the respondent - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 1st March, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant is the original complainant and according to him, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, who are the original accused, had purchased cloth worth about Rs.15 lakh from him sometime in 2007. Out of that, some amount i.e. Rs. 3 to 4 lakh remained to be paid and inspite of demand, the amount was not paid. Therefore, he filed a complaint. This Court by order dated 26.3.2009 had granted anticipatory bail holding that the dispute appears to be a civil nature and the complaint has been filed as an arm twisting tactic to knock out money. This 2 Cri-A-117-11.sxw application is filed by the applicant for cancellation of anticipatory bail on the ground that the accused was shown to be absconding in the charge-sheet. Para 7 of the said order shows that the applicant was directed to report the concerned police station, as and when called. Therefore, as and when required, police could intimate and call them to the police station. It appears that police did not bother to inform them and filed charge sheet showing them as absconding. This cannot be a fault of the accused persons. In fact, in such circumstances, the trial Court can issue summons or warrants to the accused persons. The learned Counsel concedes that the trial Court has in fact issued bailable warrants. In view of the above circumstances, there is no valid ground for cancellation of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)