1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.435/2011 In Writ Petition No.2689/2011 (D) [M/s. Hada Bearing and Mill Stores .vrs. Raminwas Jawrilal Kabra] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Shri J.M. Gandhi, Advocate for appellant, Shri R.M. Sharma, Advocate for respondent. .......... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2011. Heard. In the petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the learned Single Judge, the Small Causes Court or the Appellate Court were not the parties. In the light of judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Muhammed Enamul Haque .vrs. Muhammad Hussain, 1968 (6) Mh.L.J. NOC Page 1 and full bench judgment of this Court in the case of Ramchandra Dagoji Rangari and others .vrs. Vishwanath Champat Naik and another, 2011 (5) Mh.L.J. 193 , the present Letters Patent 2 Appeal is misconceived. With liberty to the appellant to take appropriate steps as are open to it in the law, we dispose of the present Letters Patent Appeal. No costs. Shri Gandhi, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks protection of possession for a period of two weeks from today to enable the appellant to take further appropriate steps in the matter. Shri Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, is opposing the request. However, in the interest of justice, protection of possession for a period of two weeks is granted, as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande