IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12211 of 2009 INDRA BHUSHAN KUMAR, SON OF SRI RAJENDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KHASGANJ, P.O. AND P.S. SOHSARAI, DISTRICT NALANDA---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR RAJYA PUL NIRMAN LTD, PATNA. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, SOUTH BIHAR CIRCLE, BIHAR RAJYA PUL NIRMAN NIGAM LTD, PATNA-15. 3. SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER, WORKS DIVISION GAYA, BIHAR RAJYA PUL NIRMAN NIGAM LTD. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA---RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioner : M/S Mrigank Mauli, Gopesh Kumar, Vinay Mistry, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Nadeem Seraj, Advocate. For the Pul Nirman Nigam : M/S G.A.-3, Uday Shankar Singh, AC to GA-3. ----------- 02. 05.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the counsel for the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation. 2. Petitioner works contractor was entrusted with works contract for raising a bridge over river Jamune. The works contract could not be executed within time indicated in the agreement and has been cancelled under order bearing No. 49 dated 22.8.2009, Annexure-10 on account of delay in execution of the contract. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that delay in execution of the contract is on account of Naxal problem over which petitioner has hardly any control. In this connection he has already filed representation before the Chairman of the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation submitting that the required police protection was not provided to him. 4. Let the competent authority of the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation consider the representation of the petitioner filed against the impugned order dated 26.8.2009, Annexure-11 as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)