'^. €^?^ ^ J- BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR {CHHATnSGARHl W.P. (S) No. 3 7?A)f 2010 PETITIONERS '.:;:^:i,^^' ^wy ^iy" ^s^. /rf-'/ : 1; o/J: 7 . <s~' \ ^-L^, ^•""^^ / ". ";€ev*. 1. Madhusudan Das -Vaishnav, S/o Shri Shatrughan Das Vaishnav, aged about 46 years, Occupatiori- ' Upper Division Teacher, Middle Sehool Bahera, Black Benietara, Distt. Durg(C.G.) / 2. Bhagirathi Dondey, S/o Shri Tetku Ram Tondey, aged about 43 years, Oecupation-Upiper Divlsion Teacher, R/o Govt. Middle School Baihadsari, Block- Bemefara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) y3. Raraesh Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shri GUhotu Prasad Tiwari, aged about 44 < years, Occupation- Upper IMvision Teacher, Govt. Middle Schoot Jewri, BlOck- Bemetara, Distt.DurgfC.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of ehllattisgarh ^.' : .'~.:';:.:F'^^^^^^ Through-The Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (G.G.) 2) District Project CO-ordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Durg (C.G.) B WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OFOTHERAPPROPRIATEWRIT. —78 srcSrqii Vw* ^n-^T^TaRi^ <in y; WWirflrWcb 3^ -^W\vi^, e>if1y'l<o,_ Pltliyy yj ,P, (e ^w.'^^b^' ° WI, 200 gn^?t 'qsw ('^pfg^.tf) TOBWTffefsn^r SB: Hon'We Shri Nlanindra Mohan Acadeihic 26-07-2010 ShriSomkantVerma, counsel Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel L^ advance copy, Heard on admission. Submission of learned coun^ advertisement (Annexure P-3), preference as compared to Shiksha to the post of Cluster Academic Coi datsd 30-06-2010, by which, 17 pei Block, District Durg as Cluster Shiksha Karmi Grade-11 whereas the <\ The representation has also been (Annexure P-4}. The advertisement (Annexure initiafed for making appointment Academic Coordinator, out of which, made. The petition appears ID be a p presume that the petitioners will n vacancies. Under these cireumstances, this stage, giving liberty to the petition' available to them under the law, in Coordinator in Duig District wt^re filled petitionere would be at liberty to pursu< Witti the aferesaid observation, br the petittonere. iwyer for fhe State/respondent No.1 on tel for the petittoners is that under the Uf^er Division Teachers are entitled to K^rmi Grade-11 in the matter of appointment tirdinator. However, in appointment prder (sons have been appointed in Bemetara Coordinator, which inctudes number of [laim of the petitionere have been ignored. fnade by the petib'oners on 03-07-2010 <^Ii4f<?lAlt'^ tTTTI^f ^f f^^ ^t^K ^siRnCT^t ihrivastava. J. |P-3) shows that process of selection was ag^inst large number of posts of Cluster pnly 17 appointments have so far been (•e-mature. At present, there is no basis to pt be appointed against the remaining tm not inclined to entertain this pefflion at ^rs to take recourse to remedy as may be |case all the posts of Cluster Academic |up without appointing ttie petitioners. The ^ their representation (Annexure P-4). |the petition is finally disposed of. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ~ 1, Judge