1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.29 OF 2010 Parvati Dnyanu Chougale & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Sushila Baburao Chougale & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Pratap Patil for the petitioners Mr.P.D.Dalvi for respondent nos.1 to 3 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 8, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 18th April 2006 and other subsequent orders passed by the trial Court. The order dated 18th April 2006 is of attachment of the immoveable property. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that under the decree a charge was kept on the property only to the extent of share of the original first defendant. He submitted that even the prayer for attachment was as regards 1/4th share of the first defendant. However, the order of attachment was passed even in respect of the share of the 2nd defendant. The petitioners are the legal representatives of the 2nd respondent. 2 Today, the learned counsel for the 1st to 3rd respondents on instructions states that the said respondents have no objection if the order of attachment is confined to the undivided share of the first defendant (4th respondent herein). 3 In view of this statement, the petition need not be kept pending and the same is disposed of by passing the 2 following order : i) The order of attachment dated 18th April 2006 passed below application at Exhibit-11 in Regular Darkhast No.5 of 2004 stands modified and it is made clear that the attachment shall be of the undivided share of the first defendant (4th respondent herein) in the property in question. ii)Writ Petition is disposed of on above terms. JUDGE