RSA No.4034 of 2006 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.S.A. No. 4034 of 2006 Date of Decision: 27 - 9 - 2011 Balraj ....Appellant v. Rajesh and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Alok Jain, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.B.R.Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.Dalbir Singh – respondent No.2 in person. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) The present Regular Second Appeal is the one, in which closely related relations, having made efforts on various dates, have finally resolved their dispute. In view of order dated 18.4.2011, this Court was hesitant to adjourn the case on the ground that dispute can be resolved amicably but persistence of counsel for the parties prevailed and this Court adjourned the matter. Today counsel for the parties have stated that compromise indeed has been arrived at between the parties, who are closely related. RSA No.4034 of 2006 [2] Statement of appellant Balraj has been recorded separately wherein he has tendered the compromise Ex.A1. The compromise has not only been signed by the parties but by their counsel also. Statements of the respondents have also been recorded. Counsel for the parties have made a joint statement that the present Regular Second Appeal be disposed of in terms of compromise Ex.A1 and in accordance thereof decree be drawn. Prayer made by counsel for the parties is accepted and the present Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise Ex.A1. The compromise and the statements made by the parties be read as a part of this order. Registry is directed to draw a decree accordingly. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) September 27, 2011. JUDGE RC