221cas6280.06.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No.6280 of 2006 in Second Appeal St. No.8942 of 2006 (Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur .vs. Sharda d/o. Asharam Nimbhekar and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: R. K. Deshpande, J. Date : January 22, 2010 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6280 OF 2006 Heard Dr. R. S. Sundaram, Adv. for applicant and Mr.R.A.Gupte, Adv. for respondent no.4. Mr. Gupte, Adv. for respondent no.4 opposes the application on the ground that there is no sufficient cause being made out. The delay caused has not been properly explained. After going through the application and hearing the parties, I am satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, the Civil Application is allowed. The delay caused is condoned. 221cas6280.06.odt 2 . Civil Application No. 25 of 2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. This is an application for grant of stay to the effect and operation of the judgment and decree dt. 25.10.2005 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.128 of 2004. The decree is for an amount of Rs.6288/-. The decree being the money decree, stay shall be conditional upon deposit of the entire amount in this Court within a period of four weeks from today. In view of the above, there shall be an interim stay in terms of prayer clause (i) of the Civil Application subject to the appellant depositing entire amount within a period of four weeks. If the amount is not deposited within the stipulated period, the interim order shall stand automatically vacated. The Civil Application stands disposed of automatically. JUDGE jais