IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2991 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH, Son of Kamta Prasad Singh, Resident of village – Trilokchak, P.O. + P.S. – Dighwara, District – Saran (Chapra). ……… Petitioner. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affair, New Delhi. 2. The Director General, C.R.P.F., C.G.O. Complex, North Block, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3. The Inspector General, C.R.P.F., Bihar, Sector Patna (Bihar). 4. The D.I.G. of Police, C.R.P.F., Muzaffarpur (Bihar). 5. The Commandant, C.R.P.F. 160 Batallian. ….. Respondents. For the Petitioner : - Sri Teg Bahadur Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : - Sri Sudhir Singh, Asstt. S.G.O. I. ----------- 2. 5.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the Union of India. Only direction the petitioner wants in the present writ application that his revision application against the order of dismissal should be disposed of by the I.G., C.R.P.F. within a time frame. The petitioner states that he has filed revision application on 27.11.2008 and the same has not been acted upon. Since the revision application has been filed only on 27.11.2008 the revisional authority is required to look into the records of the matter before final opinion. It cannot be said that the respondents have been negligent in deciding - 2 - the issue. However, it is hoped and expected that the final order will be passed by the revisional authority within four months of the communication/ production of a copy of this order. The writ application is disposed of with the above direction. DKS/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)