IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-22940 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.12.2010 Bharath Thiyagarajan and another ...Petitioners versus State of U.T., Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Paras Money Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Toor, Advocate for respondent No.1-U.T. Ms. Manisha Setia, Advocate for Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has stated that U.T. Police, is going to withdraw the impugned notices issued against the petitioners. 2. In this view of the matter, the instant petition becomes infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such. 3. Needless to mention that petitioners would join the investigation at Chennai on 20/21.12.2010 and Investigating Officer will conduct the investigation in the bank premises at Chennai. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) December 01, 2010 Judge naresh.k