^ gETmONER IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION ?S) No. ^i<3 I OF 2009 Y Shrikant Tiwari, S/o late Shri Ramanuj Tiwari, aged about 58 years, At Present Posted as District Auditor in the office of Deputy Director Panchayat and Social Welfare, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^e> (^'•<v.-''f\ry: y/^y ^^^y ay r./ K?: B^. EB>: KW' n. 1. ^" 2. 3. State of Chhattlsgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Social Welfare Department Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Deputy Collector, Office of the CollectOrate, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. y The Deputy Director, Panchayat and social Department, Raigarh, Raigarh (C.G.) Welfare District 5. ShriN.P. Patel,S/o Shri Chandan Singh Patel, aged about 57 years, Post-Panchayat and Social Welfare Organizer, (Presently Working las In-charge of Principal, SeCretary Training Institution) Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) -'^y/f ^ ; WRITRETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR; ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRrT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAI^US, CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT/WRITS OR ORDER/ORDERS OR DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS OF THE LIKE 4 XI-HC-22 an^r^i f^llctl 1*ft_^t ai*( ^^ 731 -i||i||c|<<, ®Tfl«-f<i<5.[siwray 3ti^T T^ . , i.d.yZ^t^-fiSSt/2.005 "WI. 200 *iii<ti sn*iic»> ft^T" ail^s'l ^WWdfel <=hrifi<?pft'r 'HW^f "^^^ 1Ef<4^1< ^?3lf:OT3fl^I |?yer for the respondents N6. 1 to (SB:. Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agr|ihQtri, J) 28.1.2010 ' • Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advctcate for the petitioner. Shri N: N.Roy, Panel La- 4/State. Heard. ! ! : Perused t.he office hote. The notice was :issued order to maintain status qu respect of the placement of tt |)n 14.-12.2009, gi-anting interim,' >, as obtained on that day, in e petitioner and the respondent No.5. Ryles, 2007, provides that 'ro) issued, the necessan' process stated in the order, or if no su| The petitioner has not taken| within the prescribed time. Rule 159, Chapter-XI,4ftheHigh Courtof Chhattisgarh henever notice is ordered to be 'ees shall be paid.within the time •h timeis stated, witiiin 15 days/ any steps fo pay process fe'es + XI-HC-22 sn^f^T R-fi'k SiI^I sb^ict) yf?a •TS? -AIWId*!, ^Til'M'l'i. (CIC1I*11< 3^?T ''^i^if u3.P.C^)'t-M)- 6 S'-^IJ 2-003 "WI, 200 »W<119lW!6 IN^T' 311^1 TCIIW 'oter Z-— On 18.1.2010 the matteii Registrar (J) on default. Since the matter is listed today, poinl^ Neither the petitioner ha| has filed an application for cor| process fees, Accordingly, the interim status quo, as obtainedpn that| As prayed, seven days tit| do'the.needful, failing which tt( for want ofprosecution, withouf ct;t<il<n'4ti *ii+ifii ^ -feT^ <(^I-^.K ^SlPOTSII^T was listed before the Additional i|ione appeared for the petidoner, l^ng out default. ^ paid process fees till date; nor |donation of delay in payment of ija-der dated 14:.12.2009,grantms day, stands vacated. tie is granfed fo the petitioner to ^e petition shall stand dismissed It reference to fhe Court. . Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge