IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20387 of 2010 DABLU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act is of false implication, custody since 18.1.2010, for alleged recovery of fire arms from his house, not from his conscious possession. Counsel for the State points out that the petitioner has signed the seizure list. Only if the petitioner has no antecedent under the Arms Act to be verified by the court below before final acceptance of the bail bond, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Bhojpur, Ara in Barhara PS Case No. 8 of 2010. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)