IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36184 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- P.P. UMMERKUTTY, S/O. ABDU, RAHATH MANZIL , NEAR SANGEETHA TALKIES, PAYYAMBALAM, KANNUR-1. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KANNUR MUNICIPALITY, KANNUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KANNUR MUNICIPALITY, KANNUR. 3. SAROJINI, W/O. LATE JOHN, MULANJIKKAL HOUSE, THANA, KANNUR-12. 4. BEENA WILLIAM, D/O. LATE JOHN, MULANJIKKAL HOUSE, THANA, KANNUR-12. 5. REENA WILLIAMS, D/O. LATE JOHN, MULANJIKKAL HOUSE, THANA, KANNUR-12. ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL FOR R3 TO 5 SRI.N.M.MADHU FOR R3 TO 5 SRI.K.K.CHANDRANPILLAI, SC FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.36184 OF 2009 (P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T Grievance of the petitioner is that by Exts.P1 and P2, though the first respondent has required late John, the deceased father of the party respondents to stop construction activities, it was carried on by him. It is stated that despite this, the first respondent was not taking any effective action for ensuring compliance with the aforesaid notices. 2. It is on record that after the issuance of Exts.P1 and P2 Sri. John expired and according to the petitioner, respondents 3 to 5 are his legal representatives. 3. Now as Sri. John has admittedly expired, if at all any corrective action is to be taken, respondents 1 and 2 will have to issue notice to the legal representatives and take appropriate action in the matter. Therefore with that liberty, the writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :