IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 144 of 2003 Anil Kumar Prajapati and another. ……….Revisionists. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. ....…. Respondents. Present : Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the revisionists. Sri Nandan Arya, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. Learned counsel for the revisionist has filed an affidavit of Anil Kumar Prajapati along with copy of compromise arrived at between him and his wife Rekha Rani on 29.07.2005. As per terms of the compromise, the instant revision will be extinguished, on the basis of this compromise because she (respondent no. 2) has received the entire Stridhan and other articles, which were entrusted in the marriage to her husband. In this regard, Section 320 (6) Cr.P.C. reads as follows: “(6) A High Court or Court of Session acting in the exercise of its powers of revision under Section 401 may allow any person to compound any offence which such person is competent to compound under this Section.” 2. Hence, in view of the terms of compromise, arrived at between the parties, revision is hereby allowed. Impugned orders dated 07.09.1998 and 26.09.2003 are hereby set aside. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 28.11.2011 SKS