^. 9^ ^IV" HIGH COURTOF CSHHA'mSGARH ATBILASPUR PETITIONER RE8PONDBNTS W.P.NO.2390/2001 Vs. AshokSarda, S/o. Shri B.D.Sarda, aged about 51 years, R/o. viU. Khamardih, Gram Panchayat Kachana, Raipur Tah. Aad Distt. Raipur (CG) The State of Chliattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Housiug and Environiaent Departinent, Mautralaya, D.K.Bhavaa, Raipur (CG) Tlie Djrector, Town aud Couatiy Planiung Department Maiitralaya, D.K.Bhawaa, Raipur(CG) .¥? '" The Jouit Director, Town aud Couatiy Planliiag Department, District Qffice, GuTUiianak Market, Sharda Ghowk, Raipur (CG) Graxu Paaehayat, Labhandi, Block Dbarsiwa, Tah. and Distt. Raipur [CG) , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE COSSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri. jy None appears for the petitioaer. Shri.S.K.Mishra, Paael Lawyerfor fhe State. ORAL ORDBR (Passed on this 28th day of November 2007) ^Utl^. The matter is called for heaniig twice. On both oceasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of fhe petinoner. The petitioner luay not be iaterested in the luatter. In view of ffae above, the writ petition is disruissed for jwaut of prosecutjon. Sd/- Satish K. Agiiiiinm Judge