AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATPISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. \SO>^/2006. PETITIONER Tarun Kumar Pandey, S/o. R. N. Pandey, aged about 32 years, Presently posted and working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Madhymik Sala, Karkeli, Janpad, Panchayat Manpur, District Rajnandgaon (C. G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D. K. S. Building Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C. G.) 3. Collector, Rajnandgaon (C. G.) 4. Zilla Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, Through : The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Panchayat Rajnandgaon (C. G.) A.--'l-^yLi*—; A~ ^ 5. Santosh Kum.ar Tamboli, S/o. Faghu Ram Tamboli, Shiksha Karmi Grade-II, Government High School, Kothi Tola, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C. G.) 6. Pushpak Kumar Sahu, S/o. Top Singh Sahu, Shiksha Karmi Grade-II, Government High School, Dara Donga, District Rajnandgaon (C. G.) 7. Shravan Kumar Yadav, S/o. Samaru Ram Yadav, Shiksha Karmi Grade-II, Governraent High School, Dara Donga, District Rajnandgaon (C. G.) 8. Smt. Rajana Ande, Shiksha Karmi Grade-II, Higher Secondary School, Birgi, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1599 of 2006 Petitioner Tarua Kuiaar Paudey Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Vivek Ranjaa Tiwari, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3. ORDERJoraa ( Passed on fhis 5th day of October, 2009 ) Heard. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subinits fhat fhe petitioner seeks pemussion of this Court to withdraw fhis writ petition, as wifh the passage of time this petition has becoiae infructuous. Leamed counsel appearuig for the respondents/State has no objection. In view of fhe foregoiag the writ petition is disinissed as withdrawn, as having becoine iafi-uctuous. No order asto costs. ThiAur Sd/- SatishKAgnihotri Judge