IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3206 OF 2004 Kartarsingh Ragvirsingh ... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra and anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. Sandesh D. Patil, for the Applicant. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for Respondent No. 1. Mr. H.V. Mehta, for Union of India. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 21st September 2004 P.C.: . Learned P.P. points out that the trial of the case can proceed from next week. The trial Court has deferred the recording of evidence because application for bail has been filed in this Court by several accused from time to time. Learned P.P. also assures that if the trial commences next week, it can proceed on day to day basis and will conclude within 3 to 4 months from the commencement of trial. If it is so, the appropriate course, to my mind, is to direct the trial Court to proceed with the trial forthwith and conclude the same preferably within six months from today. The Applicant and other accused will extend full co-operation for early disposal of the trial. If the trial is not concluded within six months from today, inspite of co-operation extended by all the accused, it will be open to the Applicant to approach this Court by way of fresh application for bail. Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)