IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39642 of 2009 DASHARATH OJHA S/O LATE BASHISHTHA OJHA R/O VILL- OJHA BARAON, P.S-MURAR, DISTT- BUXAR Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 05/ 12.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Complainant/Informant and the State. Initially complaint was filed which was sent to the police and there after a case was registered under sections 366,120B of the Indian Penal Code. Complainant/Informant has alleged that the petitioner’s was acquainted with the Complainant/Informant. Complainant/Informant’s daughter was missing and suspicion was raised against the petitioner and his family members. Ultimately, a demand of Rs 2 lacks was made. Submission is that petitioner’s son and informant’s daughter are resident of the same village and they are Gotiyas. The date of birth of informant’s daughter is 8.1.1990 whereas the date of birth of petitioner’s son is 5.2.1984 and both are marriageable age. When the informant’s daughter knew about the complaint, she personally appeared before the court and filed affidavit That affidavit is annexure 4. In that affidavit, it has been stated that she has herself married with son of the petitioner and her father is unnecessarily putting pressure on her husband and his family members. Leaned counsel for the Informant opposes the prayer for bail stating that both (boy and girl) are of the same village and are Gotiyas. It has been stated that victim was not produced before the court and a fake application was filed. Facts remain that the petitioner is father of the main accused and the - 2 - alleged marriage was solemnized, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar/ court concerned in Navanagar P.S .Case no. 31 of 2009. shahid (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J)