-: 1 :- CP-437/08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 437 OF 2008 Sarita R. Shinde. ..Petitioner. Versus Mangala H. Salunkhe and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar for the petitioner. Mrs. V. S. Mhaispurkar, AGP for R-4 & 5. Mr. P. D. Dalvi for R-1 to 3. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 18, 2011. P. C. : 1. There is no dispute that in pursuant of the order dated 4th July 2008 passed by the President, One Member Grievance Committee for Entertaining Complaints of Shikshan Sevaks, the petitioner is re-instated in service on 8th February 2011. 2. So far as back-wages are concerned, Mr. Dalavi, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 after taking instructions from his clients, who are present in Court, makes a statement that they will submit to Education Officer-4th respondent the proposal for grant of arrears of back-wages pertaining to the petitioner, within the period of three weeks from today. Statement is accepted. 3. Mrs. Mhaispurkar, learned AGP states that respondent no.4 – Education Officer, after the receipt of proposal from respondent srp -: 2 :- CP-437/08 nos. 1 to 3, will decide the same within the period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the same. Statement is accepted. 4. In view of the above statements, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner’s grievance is substantially complied with. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 5. I also find that in view of the statements made by the respondents, the order in respect of which contempt is alleged, stands complied with. In the light of this, petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. (RANJIT MORE, J.)