- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 90 OF 200 PATENT APPEAL No. 90 OF 200 PATENT APPEAL No. 90 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- Office notes, : office memoranda : of coram, : appearances, : Court’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s directions & : order Registrar’s : orders : -------------------------------------------------- Mr. L.C. Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. M.L. Palam with S. V. Mhatre i/b M. K. Khatri & Co. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J. N. PATEL, J. N. PATEL, J. N. PATEL, AND A. A. A. A. SAYED, JJ. A. SAYED, JJ. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 26, 2007. : APRIL 26, 2007. : APRIL 26, 2007. P.C.: . Heard. The Letters Patent Appeal, impugning decision of the learned Single Judge, which upheld the order in respect of description of property is confirmed the judgment & decree of the trial Court. Besides the issue as to whether Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable, after the learned Single Judge in exercise of - 2 - jurisdiction under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India. We do not find any error or illegality in the impugned order. Therefore, the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed with costs. 2. Civil Application in this Letters Patent Appeal does not survie and is disposed off accordingly. 3. The learned counsel for the parties by consent submitted that the costs granted while disposing off the Civil Application may be credited in the High Court Legal Aid Committer and it is ordered accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [ A. A. SAYED, J.] A. A. SAYED, J.] A. A. SAYED, J.] [ J. N. PATEL, J.] J. N. PATEL, J.] J. N. PATEL, J.]