-(1)- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1421 OF 2007 Ulhas @ Babu Dattaram Rao. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .. Mrs.Sonia Miskin, Adv. appointed for the Petitioner. Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2007. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2007. DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the Petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner had preferred an application for furlough. The said application for furlough came to be rejected as the petitioner is convicted in a case under Section 394 of IPC and also on the ground that the surety, which was proposed by the petitioner -(2)- i.e. his mother and brother, have refused to stand as surety for him. In such case, we cannot find any fault with the authorities in rejecting the application for furlough. No interference is called for. Writ Petition is rejected. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner prefers a fresh application for furlough and furnishes suitable surety, the authority shall dispose it off in accordance with law. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]