IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1968 of 2011 Decided on: 6.4.2011 Reeta Kumari ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …..Respondents. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.A.G. & Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 and 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) That the respondent department may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to perform the duty and the illegal and void termination may kindly be set aside. ii) That the respondent No. 2, 3 may kindly be directed to give the appointment in view of Annexure P-2”. 2. The petitioner may approach the Block Primary Education Officer, Pangi, in which case the said Officer will get an opportunity to look into the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the Block Primary Education Officer, Pangi to look into the matter with notice to the petitioner and respondents No. 3 and 4 and take appropriate action in accordance with law, adverting to the submissions made in the writ petition, within three months. The petitioner will produce 2 a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the Block Primary Education Officer, Pangi and also respondent No.3. 3. In view of final disposal of the main petition, all the pending application(s), if any also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), April 6, 2011 Judge (BSS/pankaj)