IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11247of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. Lekh Ram . ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he was appointed in 1994 and completed 10 years on 31.12.2003 with 240 days in each calendar year, however, he has not been considered for regularization till date. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents-State to consider the case of the petitioner immediately after completion of 10 years with 240 days in each calendar year within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, with all consequential benefits. The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) December 23, 2010. Judge (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.