:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.803 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.803 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.803 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L)NO.168 OF 2007 (L)NO.168 OF 2007 (L)NO.168 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1453 OF 1993 NO.1453 OF 1993 NO.1453 OF 1993 M/s.Popular Construction ..Applicant Vs. Canning Mitra Phoenix Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.M.P.S.Rao with Ms.Bhadra Dalal for the Applicant. Ms.Saumya Srikrishna i/b. Kanga & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2007 : 10TH APRIL, 2007 : 10TH APRIL, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion the Applicant is seeking condonation of delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. There is no affidavit-in-reply controverting the Notice of Motion. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)