^'^^^ ^fl€\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition (227) No. 408 of2009 PETITIONERS ReSlN>5ld<?5its 1. Smt. Prabhawati Shesh, aged about 80 years, widow oflate Gopal Rao Shesh. 2. Vinod Kumar, aged about 60 years, son of late Gopal Rao Shesh. 3. Mukund Rao, aged about 54 years, son of late Gopal Rao Shesh. 4. Milind, aged about 47 years^ son of late Gopal Rao Shesh. No. 1 to 4 are residents ofTatya Para, Raipur (CG). 5. Smt. Jyoti Kiran, aged about 45 years, Daughter of late Gopal Rao Shesh & Wife of Dr. Vyay Pole, resident of Anaiid Van Vai'ora, Distt. Chandrapur (MH). 6. Sunanda, aged about 54 years, daughter of late Gopal Rao Shesh, wife of Shri Ashok Ghate, resident ofA.T.I. Campus, Kanpur (UP). 7. Smt. Madhuri, daughter of late Gopal Rao Shesh, aged about 47 years, wife of Shri Shyam Rao Deshpande, resident of Primary Health Centfe, Mat-wahi, District Bilaspur. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarli, ttirough the Secretary, Ministry of Rsvenue/General Administration Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. The Collector, Durg. 3. TheTehsildar,Dhamdha,DisfrictDurg. (WRIT PEIITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTirUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hontbte Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri, J.) RESPONDENTS Appellsisite Preseiit : Shri Kshitiz Shamia. Advocate for the petitioners. Shrt A.S. Kachliwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe-State. Sahu A 1. 2 ORALORUER (Pssscd GN 23rd day ofJanuary, 2009) With the consent ofthe parties, tfae matter is taken up for hearing tinally, Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instmction, seeks pemiission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make an applicatioii/representation betbre the respondent No. 2 &3,io consider his giievances and decide in accordaiice wifh law, within the stipulated period oftime. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, leanied counsel appearing for fhe State submits that iftan application/representation is made, the same may be considered in accordance with law, on its own merits, preferably withm a period ofeij^rt weeks fromthe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofapplication/representation. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn wifh fhe above stated libeily. No order asto costs. Consequently, pcndmg applications, ifany, stand disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge