IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-24064 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.01.2011 Harpinder Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Joginder Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG Punjab Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the complainant – respondent No. 2 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as complainant state that matter has been amicably settled between the parties, hence, proper legal course would be to settle/compound the offence, in view of this present petition be dismissed as not pressed at this stage. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. (ALOK SINGH) 06.01.2011 JUDGE reena