1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2007 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION NO.122 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION NO.122 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION NO.122 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 614 OF 2007 Sachin Sharad Kamble. .. Appellant. vs. Navi Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Transport Service & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. A.K. Jalisatgi for the Appellant. Mr. Sandesh Deshpande for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009. DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009. DATE: 5TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. . In view of the fact that the departmental enquiry is concluded, the appellant does not want to prosecute this Appeal and seeks to withdraw the same. 2 2. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the writ petition has also become infructuous in the matter. It will be proper that the learned counsel for the parties move the learned Single Judge in view of the subsequent development i.e. conclusion of the departmental enquiry and seek appropriate orders. 3. In so far as the appeal is concerned, we are permitting the appellant to withdraw the same as infructuous. 4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the civil application does not survive. The same is dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.) (Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)