THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Dated: 31-12-2010 WRIT APPEAL No. 1172 OF 2010 Between: Perla Danayya ... APPELLANT AND Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited (A Government of India Undertaking) rep., by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Visakahapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam and two others …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1172 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) Upon own showing of the appellant, his age as on 25-12-1982 which is the date of his entry into service, was 32 years and the statement regarding age was supported by a certificate of a Medical Officer. No doubt the respondents too at that point of time had got him examined and the certificate obtained revealed that his age appears to be 28 years and by appearance also. Apparently, the certificate was not definite about his age, whereas the certificate produced by the appellant himself depicts specific declaration by the Medical Officer certifying his age as 32 years. Perhaps in that backdrop, the respondents chose to rely on the certificate furnished by the appellant against which he should not register any grievance because it forms the basis of the order upon which his appointment is founded. Reckoned on the certificate produced by the petitioner he is scheduled to retire today. Apart from that he has approached the Court just five/six months back, apparently at the fag end of his service. Interference is uncalled for. Dismissed. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 31-12-2010 K. Shyleshi