IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3404 of 2009 Widow Dai Jee Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 6 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the University annexing the copy of the reasoned order passed by the respondent no.4, the Registrar of the University. Learned counsel for the University submits that the order of the Court has been complied with by passing the necessary order, and as such, this contempt application need not proceed further. Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid order is not correct and the amount alleged to be defalcated by the deceased employee could not have been recovered from the arrears of the retiral dues and as such the order is bad in law and petitioner proposes to assail the same before the appropriate forum. Be that as it may, since the order of the Court has been complied with, this application need not proceed further and the same accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)