IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-20893 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.7.2011 Pinky and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioners are not married but it is stated that they are major and are living together. This court is not inclined to interfere in such like matters where the relationship is ambiguous and neither it is inclined to grant protection that has been prayed for the simple reason that there are no means to assess the threat perception and physically it is not possible to give constant protection. However, keeping in view the fact that a representation has been made by the petitioners to respondent No.2 regarding the threat that the petitioners apprehend, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievance which has been made in the representation and, after assessing the situation, take necessary action in accordance with law. 13.7.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss