CRM-M-32595-2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] ::::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32595-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:31.10.2011 Bhagwan Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mrs. Satwant Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in a case registered vide FIR No.48 dated 28.03.2011, under Sections 307, 323, 324, 325, 336, 148, 149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Lopoke, District Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that it is a case of cross version in which co-accused Ram Singh and Gurwinder Singh have also received grievous injuries at the hands of the complainant party. She also submitted that no specific injury is attributed to petitioner No.1, whereas the petitioner No.2 was allegedly armed with Kirpan and had allegedly caused injuries on the back of Hardeep Singh and on the left wrist of Gurwinder Singh which are both on the non material part of the body. She further submitted that the petitioners had also joined the investigation in terms of the interim order passed by the learned Court below before their bail application was dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner but from the impugned order I have found that petitioner No.1 had used .12 bore double barrel gun in the occurrence and caused injury on the left thigh of Iqbal Singh and back bone of Rajinder Singh, whereas petitioner No.2 had caused injuries CRM-M-32595-2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] ::::::::: on the back of Hardeep Singh and the wrist of right arm of Gurwinder Singh. Keeping in view the injuries attributed to the petitioners which includes the injury dangerous to life, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. October 31, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE