HTRH rOTIttT OF n-THATTTSCART ^.AJLaL-g^X ^»/^,?•^-?X^..X '^J?-a.: ^^X^.-fl-XZ^ ^, ^. ^O'^Jx'^X' iT BTT.AS'PT] i^TS.^S. ^s s^ -L S. -B. A^ HON'BLE JUSTICE K. AGN1HOTR: yrKilr r. PETITIONES Namo Prasad Shukla. S/o Lats Saatosh Kumar Sfaukia, Aged about 40 years, Assistant '"r' ^Qf- i^ ^f J_ ^IAi-.'ilSiJ. ^ Govt. ^^-j¥^-;r;^"I- j. iiiijss..f y Kctiool Lacclianpur, yiocic Balauda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattiseam. Tlirough the Secrstary, Education Department n y O 'Ri-n'a-B.l Dn;n!,<- 1'P n \ '.1'^.L;. Ljilciw-a.ii^ i~\.€iiyul i^/.^j.^ iie District Education OiBcer. Uistrict Janigir-'-fiampa (U.u-.) The B2ock Education OiScer. Block Ba'auda, District Janjgir-Champa CC.G.'i WRIT PETITICn'J UNDER ASTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EOR_JSSUANC^QE.WSIlL_nL_riATUKE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORASY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. Pi":6serit^ Shri Ashwani Shukla. Advocate for the oetitioner, Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer &r the State / respoadents. aS&SU k}ii L7 USV lUl-/-xUAll- Learned counssl appearine fbr the petitioner as wel2 a.s fbr tlis State;respondsnts jointly submit tliat the fact fmd questioii of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to tliat of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Corporatioii, (II) MPJR-CG 961. whicli has been -^...-^3^^ ^- dispossd of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondesits does not controvert ths sa.id submission. Li Subsequent cases, i.e., W^'it Petiticm (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Verma vs. The State Goi't. of Chhatfisgpj'h fsnother) and other connected matters. decided bv this Court on 15- 12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Educatioa, Bhopal anc the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nosienclaturs of fhs Basic Trainina lEstitute. i,e.. B.T.I. has besn cfaanaed and renamed as Dinloma in Education. i.e.. D.Ed, Accoming'v. fhe D.Ed. Ceniiicate holders are also coversd by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Swngr Verma vs. The Sfate Govt. of gHofher) •iiinra Accordinslv. the wi'it Detition is aljowed 131 temis ot tlie order passed in fhe case of Yashwant Bharadwaj Vs. Corporation, Durg (Siipra), subjecl; to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquirsd D.Ed. Exa.miiiation Certificate oa his own expenses as per fhe circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and furfter mdiethsr 2ie has beea oaid two ach'aace mcrements or not. No order as to costs, Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge