1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.3975/2007 (Anil Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : September 06, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Sanjay Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no allegation against the present petitioner causing any injury to the deceased, however, there is an allegation of causing injury to complainant Basu, which is simple in nature by sharp-edged weapon. On perusal of the statements of the witnesses, it is clear that the injuries by axe and Dharia respectively to deceased have been assigned to co-accused Shanker and Rakesh. On perusal of the injury report of Basu, it appears that she suffered incised wound, which is simple in nature by sharp-edged weapon. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no injury alleged to have been caused by the petitioner to the deceased, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Anil Kumar s/o Shanker Meena be released on bail in FIR No.259/2006, P.S. Kherwada, Distt. Udaipur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-