Petitioner Wn’t Petition (S) N0. 5092 of2008 Yogendra Plasad Gupta, son of Umesh Prasad Gupta, agsd about 44 yrs, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Middie Schooi, Kaljee (Dan'ma Read), Sarguj'a, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents 1. Shn' K. P. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shxi Yashwant Singh ’l‘haKur, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. (Passed on this 12th Day of September, 2008) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the palties the matter is heard finally. 2. Leaxned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of two increments, as he has obtained the D.Ed. certificate in the year 1999 on his own expenses, during the service period. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to the concerned authority for grant of two increments pursuant to IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’IVI‘ISGARH : BILASPUR 2. The Distn'ct Education Officer, Ambikapur, Distrct Ambikapur (Sarguga), Chhattisgarh. Bilaspur, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Block Education Ohicer, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (Sarguga), Chhattisgarh. 4. Principal, Govt. Middle Schocl, (Darima Road) , Distn'ct Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri J.) State of Chhatu'sgarh, Through Secretaxy, School Education Department Ministry D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Katje, Sarguga, .——v”1// the judgment and order dated 3.4.2006, passed by this Court in ‘the matter of Yashwaut Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg & anotheri (W.P.No. 3977/ 2003). The State Govemmerit is under an obligation to follow the law settled by this Court and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has already been settled by this Court The employees, who are similarly situated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at par with other employees, who have approached this Court. It is not necessary to approach this Court for similar onler. In View of the foregoing reasons, this petition stands disposed of. lf the representation is tiled by the petitioner, the same may be considered and decided, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks form the date of receipt of the representation. ‘W‘: Satish K. Agnihotrij ‘ Judge y .‘ ’ 2006 (no MPJR-CG— 96