IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32047-M of 2009 Date of Decision:20.5.2010 Ashok Kumar and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.S. Sihota, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate for the Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the respondents to provide adequate security/protection to the petitioners to save their lives, liberty and property. It is stated that the petitioners are ready to bear the expenditure towards such police protection, if granted. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Police, Rohtak may review the threat perception afresh and if found necessary, may provide the said police protection, however, subject to the petitioners' paying the salary/expenses towards the grant of such security. Disposed of accordingly. 20.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE