IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 RP.No. 311 of 2011(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32602/2010 Dated 11/03/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER / 4TH RESPONDENT : ----------------------------------------------------------- P.M.HASSANKUTTY, PARAPPALLY HOUSE, KUMMANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. MR. P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) MR. LUIZ GODWIN D'COUTH MR. K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATIONARY CONTROLLER, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF STATIONARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033. 2. ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF STATIONARY, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF STATIONARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. 4. P.S.MOHAN KUMAR, PARVATHY BHAVAN, THRIKKODITHANAM, CHANGANACHERRY - 686 102 R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. BENNY GERVASIS R4 ADV. MR. M.P. MADHAVANKUTTY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R.P No . 311 Of 2011 IN W.P.(C) No. 32602 Of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 05th July , 2011 ORDER This Review Petition arises from the judgment dated 11.03.2011 in W.P(C) No. 32602 of 2010, whereby the said case was closed, without entering into the merits, but for recording the submission made from the part of the learned Government Pleader as to the turn of events, particularly with regard to the issuance of the letter bearing No. 15908/D/2010/STA dated 05.03.2011, which in fact was enough to extend the necessary reliefs to the petitioner therein. 2. The review petitioner submits that, by virtue of the above proceedings, the review petitioner who was the additional 4th respondent in the writ petition stands much aggrieved, which made him to approach this Court by filing this petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties concerned and the learned Government Pleader. 5. As mentioned already, no merit adjudication of the case was made by this Court, while disposing of the Writ Petition on 04.03.2011, but for recording the submission made by the learned Government Pleader as aforesaid. In other words, the closing of the case as per R.P. No. 311 of 2011 : 2 : the verdict dated 11.03.2011 was only for the fact that no further orders are warranted in the said writ petition in view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader. It is made clear that, if the review petitioner is aggrieved of any of orders passed by the Government, it is always open for him to challenge the same by resorting to appropriate steps.. 6. The learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that, the said petitioner has already approached this Court challenging the above mentioned order of the Government by filing W.P(C) 8301 of 2011, wherein interim order of 'status quo' has been granted. In the said circumstances, the review petition is closed, making it clear that all the contentions are left open to be agitated in the writ petition, stated as preferred before this Court challenging the aforesaid order of the Government. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd