gst 1 sa60.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SECOND APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2010. Narayan Vishswanath Kshtriya.... ..... .....Apellant V/s Nashik Mun. Corporation..... ..... ..Respondent. Mr.Sandeep D. Shinde, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.M.L.Patil, Adv. For the respondent. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 26th August, 2010. PC: Heard Mr.Shinde for the appellant and Mr.Patil for the respondent. By the present appeal the appellant challenges the concurrent findings thereby dismissing the suit filed by the present appellant claiming for declaration that the defendant-corporation had no right to proceed to acquire the land and that too without paying compensation to the appellant. 2. It is the contention of the appellant that the appellants were tenants in the premises which are acquired by the Corporation for widening of the road. It is submitted that the said premises were acquired without giving notice to the appellants and without being paid any compensation. 3. The position is disputed by the learned counsel for the Corporation contending that the land was acquired by private negotiations. If according to the appellant they are entitled to compensation towards acquisition of premises where they were tenants, they are entitled to raise their claim before the Collector and if such claim is raised before the Collector, the Collector is duty bound to refer such dispute between the claimants for determination in accordance with law to the Civil Court under section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. Appeal is therefore disposed of with the aforesaid observations.