wL IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. {aL /200y3 PETITIONER / Narendra Kumar Patel, aged about 35 years, S/o P.R. Patel, By Occupation, Proprietor, Radiant Computer, R/o Raj apara, Kanker VERSUS “y! RESPONDENTS /1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary its Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur Chief‘Engineer, Pradhanrnantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Development Commissioner Office, Raipur Executive Engineer, Pradhanmantri Gram Sadak Yojna, District Kanker Sub Divisional Officer, Rural Engineering Service, Sub Division, Kanker Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh Gram Vikas Abhikaran, Civfl§Lines, Raipur WRIT PETITION/IINDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m HEGH COURT OF QHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 521 0f2009 PE'I‘ITIONW? : Narendra Kumar Patel VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofChhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF TH}; CONSTITUTIO N ”7 OF 1NDIA SB: Eon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri‘ J. ?resent: Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. Gown QRtjER (ORAL) I (Passed 0n 21“ day of October, 2010) 1., At the vely outset, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the requisition has been sent to the respondent No.5 for release ofthe amount. As and when the amount is received, the same shall be released to the petitioner to satisfy his legal claim. At this juncture, leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner concurs with the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for/ e Statei‘and further submits that nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. However, learned counsel prays that the respondents may be directed to do the needtul at the earliest. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. It is expected that the respondent authorities. No.3 & 5 shah do the needful as expeditiousiy as possibie. 'w ski/- . Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ t i l l i i l l l L 'l,