IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13576 of 2009 AMIT RAI VS STATE ----------- 2 22.05.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. Petitioner who is husband of the victim is in custody since 10.2.2009 in a case registered for offence under section 498A of the penal code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Case. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that subsequently complainant has lodged another case in the Uttar Pradesh in which he is on bail. It is also submitted that he would abide by the conditions imposed by the court if he is released on bail. The petitioner’s counsel denies the allegation of another marriage. It is also submitted that he has filed a divorce case. It is submitted on behalf of the complainant that the petitioner continued to commit torture for dowry and retracted from his earlier commitment made before the panchayat. It is also alleged that petitioner has contracted another marriage. The petitioner however denies the allegation. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner as above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Complaint case no. 1823 of 2006. Both the bailors of the petitioner would be his own relatives and he would be present on almost each and every date. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J).