1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 205 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 273 OF 2010 Harish Purshottam Bhat ... Appellant v/s Bryan Savio D’Souza ... Respondent Mr.S.Sakhardande i/by Miss Geeta M. Bhoir for the appellant. Mr.B.P.Shukla for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 8TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appellant has approached this Court contending that the Trial Court has erred in granting an injunction in favour of the respondent. By way of ad-interim relief, the Trial Court has directed the appellant/defendant not to carry out any construction activity in the suit property and further not to interfere with the possession of the plaintiff of the suit property without due process of law. 2 2. In my opinion, there is no need to grant any relief to the appellant since, prima facie, he has not been able to show the Court that he is in possession as a matter of right. 3. Appeal from order stands dismissed along with the civil application. 4. The Trial Court will decide the notice of motion on its own merits uninfluenced by the observations made by it while granting ad-interim relief and the observations made in this order as they are prima facie. ..... 3