^yfltf"^;; g" •^" •S<li»d»X.:•! ftfv V ""\^ '• c^ A- INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHUATnSGARH BItASPUR WIUT PmTtON fS^ N0. l\8a>^ OP 2009 t>ETETIONER : ^:^.^; ^ 'v^ ^'.-^ ^ft^-y r^>' RESPONDEWTS ; Smt. Saraswati Bai Sahu, aged about 35 years, W/0 Shrt Salikram Sahu, R/0 Gram Panchayat Tenduwa, Tahsit- Sajs, District- Ourg, (C.G.) VERSUS (t) State of Chhattfegarh, Through Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vika$ Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) ^T^ (f/ ^\^€ g«jS.S.^u^ik) S li\"'"(:z^, ^-^.,,^ (2) Additional Collector, Bemetara, District- Durg, (C.G.) (3) Chief Executive OfRcer, Gram Panchayat Saja^ District- Durg/ (C.G.) w^ VI S. (4) Prcgect Officer, Ekikrit Mahita Evam Bal Vikas Pariyojna, Saja District Ourg, (C.G.) (5) Laxmi BaiD/0 Vir^ndra Kumar Patel, R/0 Vitlage- Tenduwa Vikas Khand and Tahsil Saja, District- Ourg, (C.G.) (6) Smt. Shanti Bai W/0 Ramji Sahu, R/0 Vidage- Tenduwa Vikas Khand and Tahsil Saja, Dlstrict Ourg, (C.G.) WR2T PETmON U/A 226 OF TME CONSITXTUTION OF INOIA 1. ParUKwtara of ttie petltioner; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT^ILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 4837 of2009 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Smt. Saraswaxi Bai Sahu. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Amit WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF_INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitiofier. Shri N.Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/'respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 22n!lday ofOctober, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to statutory appellate forum before the Director, Panchayat against the impugned order dated 06ttl AugusL 2009 (Amiexure P/l). 2. Shri Tripathi fiirther submits that the present petition was filed at tlie time when the post of Director, Panchayat was vacant. It is fui-ther contended that vide order dated 02 September, 2009, tfais Court has granted an order of status quo, the same may be contiaued for a further period of two weeks so that the petitioner may file appropriate appeaVrevision and obtain appropriate interim order fi-om the Director, Panchayat. 3. Shri Roy, leamed Panel Lawyer appearmg for tlie State/i'espondents has no objection. 4. It is ordered as prayed for. 5. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. Having regard to the facts situation oftfae case, the mterim order to maintain status quo passed on 02 September, 2009 by this Court, shall remain in foree for a further period oftwo weeks from today. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge