IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21183 of 2010 PRAMOD LAL SON OF SATYANARAYAN LAL, R/O VILLAGE-BULAUR (BALPAR), P.S. UDWANTNAGAR, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 04.08.2010 Heard Sri Rajni Ranjan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri U.S.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri Mukul Prasad, learned counsel for the complainant. The petitioner is named accused in this case being husband of the complainant. The couple were married on 21.4.1999 and are blessed with three children. Petitioner carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. with further allegation of performing second marriage with one Munni Devi but in absence of any supporting material cognizance was not taken for the offences under section 494 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner specifically denies allegation of second marriage and expressed intention to resume and continue marital life with the complainant with all due dignity and honour. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 2 petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in Complaint Case no. 1250 ( C ) of 2009 / T.R. no. 2805 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad