Crl. Misc No. M 15185 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M 15185 of 2011 Date of decision : October 14, 2011 Sunaina, ...... Petitioner v. State of U.T.Chandigarh, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.180, dated 27.7.2010, registered under Section 304 of the IPC, at Police Station Manimajra, Chandigarh. The petitioner is the mother-in-law who has been in custody since 27.7.2010. On 16.8.2011, the following order was passed :- “ It is stated that only five witnesses including three doctors, one lady Constable and an ASI are yet to be examined. The case is now stated to be listed for 1.9.2011 before the trial Court Learned counsel for the U.T.Administration, on instructions from Amarjit Singh, ASI, states that one out Crl. Misc No. M 15185 of 2011 ::2:: of the three doctors has gone abroad and can be given up or substituted by another doctor to prove the post-mortem report. That being so, let the lady Constable, the ASI and the remaining two doctors and/or another doctor in place of the left out doctor shall be produced for their examination on the date fixed before the trial Court i.e 01.09.2011. The learned trial Court shall record the statements of the above-mentioned witnesses on the date fixed. List on 13.9.2011.” Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the evidence has yet not been concluded, rather a supplementary challan has been filed. Counsel for the respondent has accepted the factual assertion. It is not disputed that the main accused viz the son of the petitioner is in custody. In these circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Chandigarh. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) October 14, 2011. JUDGE `kk'