SSK/915 1 WP/2906.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2906 OF 2011 Prasun Rameshchandra Agarwal ....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Anil Lalla i/b. M/s. Lalla & Lalla, advocates for the petitioner. Mr. A. S. Shitole, APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 19th DECEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to quash and set-aside Order dated 10th August, 2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No. 697 of 2011 confirming Order dated 28th June, 2011, of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay thereby rejecting the petitioner's application to furnish the English translation in Sessions Case No.221 of 2004. SSK/915 2 WP/2906.11 3. Mr. Lalla, learned counsel for the petitioner, on last occasion, had given a list of 22 documents relied upon in the charge-sheet. He submitted that if the English translation of these documents referred to in the list is given, then, it will suffice his purpose. Mr. Shitole, learned APP, after taking instructions from Mr.Sagar Kawale, PSI, attached to Versova Police Station, makes a statement that English translation of the said 22 documents referred to in the list given by Mr.Lalla will be supplied within a period of eight weeks from today. The statement is accepted. In view of the statement, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 4. However, for a period of eight weeks from today, the trial of the Sessions Case No.221 of 2004 shall not be commenced. (RANJIT MORE, J.)