FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6127 OF 2011 "Dipanjali Kalyanrao Veer Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. R.K. Ashtekar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.B. Dhongade, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 8th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner has filed this petition since she has not been issued an appointment order inspite of her selection. 2] Shri Dhongade, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.4 makes a categorical statement that though the petitioner is selected , the appointment order could not be issued to her since the State Government has imposed a ban on recruitment. he further makes a categorical statement that as soon as the ban is lifted, the appointment order will be issued in favour of the petitioner. 3] Petition is, therefore, disposed of by recording the statement made on behalf of respondent No.4. It is made clear that as soon as the ban is lifted, the petitioner will be appointed within 15 days from the lifting of the ban. grt/- [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]