s ^ IN THE HIGH COURT^FCHHATTISGXRH BILASPUR Misc. AppealNo. tj^.^ /200J Appellants/ . 1. Smt Dulari Devi W/o Ramlakhan Prajapati, Age about 52 Yrs. Applicants 2. Ramlakhan Prajapati, S/o Ramphal Prajapati, Age about 55 Yrs. ,; Both are R/o Vill. Hirapur, PS Aamanaka Raipur, Teh. & Disn. Raipur VERSUS Respondents/ /l. Balvinder Pal Singh S/o Satnam Singh Non - •' R/o Tatibandh, Teh. & Distt. Raipur (CG) Applicants 2.^ The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. - ^Branch 310202, Model Basti, New Delhi-5 Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Kutchery.Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur, (CG) ^ ^s^ ^'•?3%< .••?".<s;;>x\^ ^y "^^ ^' APPEAL U/S 30 OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT^1923 '^ •^K^^ ^ ;g ^ssgEaBS B '-'.-•i ^t^^^r^' ^^ ^ 't "n^.^J fct. ^y. fciteZ^^ \'» ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ. Appellants Applicants Respondents Non-appilcants M.A. No.499/2006 Smt. Dulari Devi and another Vs Balvinder Pal Singh and another Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate for respondent No.2. ORDER (Orall (19th July, 2011) Per I.IVI. Quddusi. J; List is being revised. The matter was called out twice. However, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants. In these circumstances, we are left with no option but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for waoj: of prosecution. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge 1