é9 K bg WRIT PETITION NO.230_CJ 12004 PETITIONER \dk fxwm Sub Divisionai Officer, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon. 4. Smt Bilid‘sh Iman, aged about 32 years, wife of Shri Shafn' Ahmd Whan, resi<ient o'f’ Taaj‘ Medicai Store, Near Nagar, Panchayat, Dongargaon, Distt‘. Rajnandgaon (CG) The State of Chhatti‘sgarh, through Collector, Rajnandgaon (CG) IN THE HIGH CCUR—F OF JUDICATURE AT EMS??? G : The Secretary, Department of Family General an& Administratioin, DKS Bhawan, Raipur The Tahsi‘idar, Tah. Dongatgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE GQNSL‘ITUTIQLI QF INEIA FQR 1§§UANQE (2E WRIT 1N TEE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. @ HIGH‘couRf'o‘F CHHATTISGARH AT Bi SPUR WP. No 2909 of2004 Petitioner Smt. Bilkish Khan Versus Respondents The Siate of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J None appears for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pa'ndey, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State O R D E R (Passed on this 27‘” day of Februawy, 2007) The foHowing order of the Court is passed by satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The petitioner, while working as Assistant Grade-Ill in Tahsii Office, Dongargaon, was transferred to Janpad Panchayat Office, Dongargaon on the same terms and conditions vide impugned transfer order dated 31 12004 (PH). 2. This Court, vide interim order dated 1.9.2004, has stayed the effect and operation of the impugned order 31 12004 (P/1) till the next date of hearing. 3. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become infructuous, as period of transfer is not appiicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View the pubiic interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. it is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incidence of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular officer/employee be posted keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere with the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malatide, non—competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. 5. ln View of the above, this petition sands disposed of. No order as to costs. Bablu