IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26054 of 2011(F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- PRISTAL M.MANGATTU, S/O. M.M.MATHAI, AGED 22 YEARS, MANGATTU HOUSE, MALAYIDOMTHURUTHU P.O., ERNAKULAM-683 561. BY ADV. SRI.C.AJITH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN-686 541. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM-686 541. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.26054/2011 F APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL RESULT OF VIIITH SEMESTER EXAMINATION OF THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE MARK LIST DTD. 28/09/2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE VITH SEMESTER OF THE B.TECH COURSE OF THE PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE MARK LIST DTD. 12/08/2011 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER FOR THE SUPPLEMENTARY EXAM OF THE VITH SEMESTER B.TECH COURSE OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE PAPER INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION NO.5118 DTD. 27/08/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOK IN INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS OF THE VITH SEMESTER B.TECH COURSE OF THE PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP NO.1544441 TOWARDS THE APPLICATION FEE FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOK IN INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS OF VITH SEMESTER B.TECH COURSE OF THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 26054 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of September , 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the VIth Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rkc