1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2010. SHAIKH ASHRAF @ SHAHRUKH S/O SHEIKH HANIF. VS STATE OF MAHA. THROUGH PSO P.S. GANESHPETH, NAGPUR. ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. K. Bhangde, Advocate for the applicant. Shri V.A. Thakre, APP for State respondent. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 15th April, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the charge sheet and accompanying documents. 3. This is a case of circumstantial evidence. 4. The weapon connectable to the assault and cause of death has been recovered. Prima facie, the accused applicant is seen involved in the commission of offence. The argument that the applicant has been falsely involved has to be proved during trial. 5. In this background, the applicant does not 2 have case for grant of bail. 6. Learned Sessions Judge may decide the Sessions Case with priority unless the old cases where the accused are in jail are pending before the Sessions Court. Judge |mule|