wp/1926/2000 a/w ors. : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1926 OF 2000 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. Shri Harish D. Khilani & anr. ... Respondents a/w WRIT PETITION NO.1931 OF 2000 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. Shri Gufran Mohamad Shaikh & anr. ... Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.1932 OF 2000 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. Shri Z.A.K. Shaikh & anr. ... Respondents Mr.J. Reis i/b N.V. Matai & S.J. S.J. Billimoria for Petitioners Mr.Praksh Devdas for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2011 wp/1926/2000 a/w ors. : 2 : ORAL JUDGMENT: 1. The orders challenged in these petitions have been passed by the Industrial Court in complaint (ULP) Nos.406 of 1997, 408 of 1997 and Complaint (ULP) No.407 of 1997. The order in Complaint (ULP) Nos.406 of 1997 and 408 of 1997 is a common order while a separate order has been passed in complaint (ULP) No.407 of 1997. Hence, the present petitions. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation seeks leave to withdraw the Petitions. He states that each of the workmen in the present petitions will be paid the amounts due and payable to them under the orders of the Industrial Court. Accordingly, he states that the respondent workman in Writ Petition No.1926 of 2000 will be paid Rs.41,462/-, the respondent in Writ Petition No.1931 of 2000 will be paid Rs.11,042/- and the respondent in Writ Petition No.1932 of 2000 will be paid Rs.34,628/-. 3. Mr.Reis on instructions from Shri Ashok C. Rairkar, Office Superintendent of the Petitioner Corporation, who is present in Court, states that the aforesaid amounts will be paid by 31st March, 2011. This statement is accepted. The learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petitions. 4. The Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.