(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1618 OF 1994 Shri Potanna s/o. Eranna Shahu, Age : 70 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Village : Banali, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Collector (Atiyat), Collectorate Office, Nanded. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Degloor, Taluka : Degloor, District : Nanded. 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Biloli, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. .. Respondents. ....................... W I T H (2) WRIT PETITION NO. 1619 OF 1994 Shri Kammana s/o. Gangaram Kathe, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Village : Banali, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Collector (Atiyat), Collectorate Office, Nanded. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Biloli, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Degloor, Taluka : Degloor, District : Nanded. .. Respondents. ........................ W I T H (3) WRIT PETITION NO. 1620 OF 1994 Shri Narsinga s/o. Lachmanna Kare, Age : Major, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Village : Banali, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Collector (Atiyat), Collectorate Office, Nanded. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Degloor, Taluka : Degloor, District : Nanded. 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Biloli, Taluka : Biloli, District : Nanded. .. Respondents. ...................... Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 4. ........................ (4) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2010 COURT'S ORDER : 1. After arguing for some time, Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petitions, with liberty to approach appropriate forum. 2. The petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of, as such, with the leave aforesaid. 3. The interim relief is operating since 1994. In view of the same, we continue the interim relief for a further period of six weeks from today. 4. While considering the application for condonation of delay, the authority shall consider pendency of the present Writ Petitions and the benefit to be given under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. (5) 5. Rule is discharged. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp1618etc