IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.748 of 2011 Md. Azad Alam @ Parvej Alam @ Guddu @ Guddu Alam son of Md. Ramjan, resident of Barka Gaon, P.S. Tarary, District- Bhojpur. … Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Sahjadi Khatoon wife of Parvej Alam, D/o Md. Farooque, resident of Barka Gaon, P.S. Tarary, District- Bhojpur, at present residing at Katahri Bagh, Bhuneshwar Path, P.S. Chapra Nagar, District- Saran. … Opposite parties. ----------- 2. 23.08.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 30.4.2011 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saran at Chapra in Maintenance Case No. 161 of 2010 by which he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2000/- per month as maintenance allowance to his wife, opposite party no. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The main grievance of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner did not get any notice in maintenance case and the impugned order has been passed ex parte. The matter as to whether the petitioner received notice issued by learned 2 Principal Judge, Family Court or not cannot be examined here. The petitioner may raise his grievance before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)