IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7846 of 2010 PRAMELA DEVI W/O LATE RAMA MISHRA R/O VILL.- BAHERA, JAHIDPUR, P.S. NANPUR, DISTT.- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE- CHANDRAMUKHI, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 2. REGIONAL MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE SPEAKER CHOWK, MUZAFFARPUR 3. CHIEF MANAGER (PERSONNEL) ZONAL OFFICE, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA PAVAPURI VIHAR NH 28, BHAGWANPUR, MUZAFFARPUR 4. BRANCH MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, SITAMARHI ----------- 05. 15.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent – Bank as also the respondent – Intervener. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the amount of family pension was paid to the petitioner during he pendency of the writ application, however, the interest for the period after submission of the Succession Certificate till date of payment of family pension has not been taken into consideration and the due interest has not been paid over the same. In the above circumstances, respondent – Bank is hereby directed to verify the facts and the admissible interest over the amount of family pension after submission of the Succession Certificate till date of payment of family pension be considered/calculated and 2 the admissible amount be paid to the petitioner within a period of six weeks and during the same period, the admissible amount of gratuity may also be paid to the original claimant as per the compromise degree, annexure- 6 to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent – Bank. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)