(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2004 Nagnath Maruti Pawar ...Petitioner Versus Balu Kondiba Thengil & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. K.P. Anilkumar, counsel for Petitioner Ms. Bina Dholakia, counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 18TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . Mr. Anilkumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that as at present nothing further survives in this contempt petition and more particularly because the elections have already been held on 21.7.2004. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.