THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2011 ORDER: (As per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ appeal is preferred by the A.P.S.R.T.C/appellants against the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.24564 of 2010, for directing the appellants to reinstate the respondent into service. 2. The respondent was engaged as Driver on contractual basis with the Corporation on 29.07.2005. The Depot Manager, Chittoor, terminated the services of the respondent through proceedings dated 14.06.2006 on the ground that the driving license submitted by him was not genuine. Challenging the said proceedings, W.P.No.24564 of 2010 was preferred. However, the learned single Judge of this Court allowed the writ petition on the ground that no enquiry was conducted before terminating the respondent from the service of the Corporation. Hence, the proceedings dated 14.06.2006 were set aside and directed the Corporation to reinstate the respondent into service. Further, it was made clear that the respondent is not entitled for back-wages and taking any disciplinary action against the respondent/workman shall be open to Corporation, if they so intend. Aggrieved by the order passed in the writ petition, the Corporation preferred the present writ appeal. 3. We have perused the material available on record. When once a fake license was produced by the respondent, the learned single Judge ought not to have directed for reinstatement. Further, neither a domestic enquiry was conducted nor a show cause notice has been issued to the respondent. However, the respondent, by filing a memo to that effect, accepted to consider his case for fresh appointment as per Circulars of the Corporation which recites that, enabling the workmen to seek fresh appointment in case the service was terminated on the ground that the driving license produced at the time of appointment was found to be not genuine, by duly filing a memo in this regard. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances stated supra, we accept the memo filed by the respondent and the impugned order dated 14.06.2006 shall stand modified, directing the Corporation to consider the case of the workman as a fresh appointment subject to the condition that the workman shall produce the driving license to the Corporation within two months. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J __________________________​______ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J 22nd December,2011 sp THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1266 OF 2011 22nd December, 2011 sp