1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2437 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri Gaikwad for the Petitioner. The Labour Court as also the Industrial Court have concurrently rejected interim relief under section 30 (2) of M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act to petitioner. He filed U.L.P. complaint and sought an interim relief not to dismiss/ terminate him from services during pendency of complaint. Misconduct alleged is of re-issuing used tickets to passengers and on spot it is claimed that present petitioner admitted his misconduct. The cash with him was found in excess. 2. The Industrial Court has also found that rule of issue and start was violated. 3. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere as I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Writ petition is rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:25/03/2011. ans/2437