IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.555 of 2010 Shyam Kishore Pandey & Anr. Versus State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 6. 06.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the Opposite parties. The direction in the writ petition was to consider the petitioners for appointment on the post of Panchayat Sevak. Learned Additional Advocate General I submits that prior to the previous order of the Court dated 27.4.2011 a show cause had been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 5, the District Magistrate. The attention of the Court was not adequately drawn to it leading to the aforesaid order. He invites the attention of the Court to paragraph 11 of the show cause that the petitioners belonging to the general category had been considered but all the 15 vacancies related to resered category the petitioners were not entitled to appointment. He submits that he has also filed I.A. No. 3612 of 2011 for recall of the order dated 27.4.2011 to the extent that it imposes costs. Counsel for the petitioner sought to persuade the Court on merits with regard to number of vacancies available as per roster. All these factors require further enquiry which cannot be held in the contempt jurisdiction. If the petitioners are of the opinion, and are so advised, they may pursue their remedy in a fresh writ application. I.A. No. 3612 of 2011 is allowed. The contempt proceeding stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)