CWP No. 19619 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 19619 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.10.2011 Rajneesh Garg ........ Petitioner Versus NFL Bathinda and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Lal Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing of the impugned selection/appointment of respondents No. 3 and 4 for the post of Pharmacist Grade V. It is contended that the selection was based on the policy of pick and choose. Respondents No. 3 and 4 have been selected by ignoring the petitioner who is having higher qualification and experience in comparison to respondents No. 3 and 4. The petitioner being eligible applied for the said post. He had the requisite qualification. Accordingly, he was called for written test. He qualified the written test and was accordingly, called for the interview. However, he was not selected. Heard. CWP No. 19619 of 2011 2 It is not disputed that the selected candidates were eligible and also had the requisite qualification and experience. They too cleared the written test. The selection cannot be set aside because the petitioner had higher qualification. The selected candidates did better in the interview. Accordingly, they were selected. The petitioner after having participated in the interview, cannot take around and challenge the same just because he was not selected. No ground. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 19.10.2011 mohan