1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.2378 of 2009 (Smt.Vimal Shriram Patil vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.Dhananjay B.thoke, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. S.G.Nandedkar, APP, for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. J.Chatterji, Adv., for respondent no.5. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 18/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Thoke and Mr. Chatterji, Counsel for the respective parties. 2. Grant of pre-arrest bail by the learned Sessions Judge dt. 20.6.2009, directing release of the accused in the event of arrest on furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- is subject of criticism by the complainant. 2 3. The complainant reinforced her submission by stating that after such orders the accused has again threatened her. This has been disputed by the Counsel representing the accused. 4. During the course of submission, both the Counsel aggreed, in order to work out the apprehension nursed by complainant Vimal Shriram Patil, accused (Uday Bhagwat Patil) will not reside within the vicinity of Raver taluka and he will stay at Barhanpur in Madhya Pradesh till filing of the chargesheet. 5. As stated earlier, this arrangement is accepted by Smt. Vimal through her Counsel and representative. The accused Uday Bhagwat Patil to abide with above undertaking. Application disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2378-09crapl