IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3757 of 2011 Md.Mehtab Alam @ Mahatab Alam, son of late Sharfuddin, resident of village – Bairya, P.S. Azamnagar, District – Katihar _____ Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Katihar. 3. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Katihar. 4. The Block Development Officer, Amdabad, Katihar, District- Katihar. 5. The Block Development Officer, Pranpur, Katihar. 6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Barsoi, District – Katihar. ______ Respondents ----------- 02. 12.7.2011 The plea of the petitioner that law was not followed with regard to the order of suspension can be best looked into when a departmental proceeding is held against him. So far as the suspension order contained in Annexure-2 is concerned, there is clear reason that the petitioner refused to obey the direction of a quasi judicial authority on an adjudication made with regard to selection/non-selection on the post of a Panchayat teacher. The Court can take judicial notice of this fact that hundreds of writs have been filed before this Court alleging that the Panchayat Secretaries are not obeying the dictates or directions of the superiors including adjudications made by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority. If the petitioner is one of those persons, who thinks that he is law by himself, then the law would certainly catch up with him. It is a matter where proceeding against the petitioner should be taken to its logical end at the earliest. No 2 interference with the suspension order is required at this stage. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)