THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.4/2010 Date of Order: 26-4-2011 Between: 1. Arja Pandu Ranga Rao and others. ..Petitioners and Arja Siva Rama Krishnaiah ..Respondent The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.4/2010 Oral order: The petitioners/Judgment Debtors filed this revision petition questioning the orders of the executing court ie., Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, dt. 22-12-2009 passed in EP No.111/2005 in OS No.124/1996, whereunder petition filed by the decree holder/plaintiff under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC r/w 39 Rule 2-A CPC to send the judgment debtors to civil prison for violation of injunction orders was allowed. It is not necessary to go into the various contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Suffice it to say, the petitioners/judgment debtors suffered an injunction order in the suit. On decreeing the suit filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction, the petitioners/judgment debtors unsuccessfully carried the matter in appeal in AS No.2/2000 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda. Therefore, the decree in the suit has become final. For alleged violation of injunction order by the judgment debtors, earlier EP No.111/2005 filed by the decree holder under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC was allowed against the first judgment debtor and EP was dismissed against the 2nd and 3rd judgment debtors by order dt.13-7-2006.. But by the impugned order dt. 22-12-2009, EP NO.111/2005 was allowed ordering arrest of the judgment debtors. When the matter is in dispute, the Mandal Revenue Officer, Mopidevi granted house patta on 20-2-2005 to the judgment debtor No.1 ie., Arja Pandu Ranga Rao. Once the Government assigned house site patta and delivered possession of the property to the judgment debtor No.1 subsequent to passing of the decree, the respondent/plaintiff has no title over the suit schedule property. On granting house site patta by the Government in favour of judgment debtor No.1, he will become the owner of the house site. In view of the same, the impugned order passed against the judgment debtor No.1 is liable to be set-aside.. Once EP was dismissed against judgment debtors 2 and 3 on 13-6-2006, without restoring the EP against them by recalling the said order, again ordering arrest, by the impugned order dt.22-12-2009, cannot be sustainable. Therefore, the impugned order dt. 22-12-2009 passed against judgment debtors 2 and 3 is liable to be set-aside. The Civil Revision Petition is allowed setting aside the impugned order dt. 22-12-2009 passed in EP No.111/2005 in OS No.124/1996 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda. Consequently, EP No.111/2005 shall stand dismissed. No costs. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. Dt.26-4-2011 kmr