IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 8281 of 2001 Between: 1 Smt. Vanga Uppalamma W/o.Rajaiah R/o. Gundlasingaram Village, Near K.U.C., Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 2 Vanga Rajender S/o. Late Komaraiah, R/o. H.No.5-3-45, Kothur, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 3 Vanga Kumarswamy, S/o. Late Komaraiah, R/o. H.No.5-3-116, Kothur, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 4 Vanga Veeraswamy, S/o. Late Komaraiah, R/o. H.No.5-3-117, Kothur, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 District Revenue Officer, Warangal District. 2 Mandal Revenue Officer, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District. 3 Smt.Bommathi Srilatha, W/o. Late Janardhan @ Janni, R/o. H.No. 5-4-87, Kothur, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. 4 Bommathi Viplav Kumar S/o. Late Janardhan @ Janni, R/o. H.No. 5-4-87, Kothur, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction expecially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in trying to rectify the entries in the Pahani Patricks basing on the order of the 1st Respondent as illegal, intentional, malafide, arbitrary, without authority, highhanded and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 not to make any such rectifications and pass Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KMR} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.8281 of 2001 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking relief primarily against the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District, to restrain him from rectifying the entries in Pahani Patrikas based upon the order of the 1st respondent- District Revenue Officer, Warangal District. 2. It is on record that there is a civil litigation pending between the petitioners and the party-respondents in O.S.No.876 of 1996. The order of the 1st respondent-District Revenue Officer, dated 01-02-2001 in R.C.No.B4/8308/98, merely directs that the rectification of the revenue record will be subjected to orders of the competent Civil Court. 3. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.2, in para-4, they have specifically stated that the orders of the District Revenue Officer being conditional no action is being taken by the office of the 2nd respondent in rectifying the Pahani Patrikas. 4. In view of the said assertion, the very apprehension and cause, which is basis of the filing of the present writ petition, does not survive. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to state whether the suit is still pending or disposed of. However, recording the averment of the respondents in the counter affidavit as mentioned above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ 03-12-2008 kvr