IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3689(S/S)2001 (Old no. 10412 of 1991) Madan Singh Adhikari S/o Sri Kam Singh, Resident of Jaunpur, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. ---- Petitioner. Vs. 1. Asstt. Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Kotdwar, district Pauri Garhwal, 2. Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. Dehradun Region, Dehradun. ---- Respondents. Sri Sanjay Bhatt, Adv. holding brief of Sri Sudhanshu Dhulia, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondents. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Sanjay Bhatt Adv. holding brief of Sri Sudhanshu Dhulia, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. None is present for the respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.12.1990 and 22.12.1990 passed by the Assistant Regional Manager, Kotdwar and Regional Manager (Dehradun Division) U.P.S.R.T.C. By the order dated 21.12.1990 the petitioner was placed under suspension under the provision of deemed suspension and vide order dated 22.12.1990 the suspension order was approved. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has already been released on bail on 5th February 1991. 2 It was contended that the petitioner was already bailed out, as such, the petitioner should not have been placed under suspension as the order of deemed suspension can be passed only when a person in behind the bars. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been deprived of making representation after he has been released on bail, because the order or suspension itself was passed after the petitioner was released on bail. In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, it is in the interest of justice to direct the petitioner to make representation before the competent authority and it is expected from the authority concerned that he will take decision on the representation of the petition, if moved by the petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order alongwith the representation and shall pass order for continuation of suspension order or revoking/modifying the suspension order. With these directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) May 8,2007 NCM: