IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 587 OF 2008 SMT. KALINDI PARSEKAR AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus MR. NAVIN MAHABALESHWAR NAIK AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. R. Rivonkar,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent No. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 5th February, 2009 P.C. Heard the Counsel for the petitioners. This is a writ petition against the order passed by the Civil Judge, S.D. whereby he has directed the Judgment Debtor to execute the sale deed in respect of shop premises situated on the ground floor surveyed under Chalta No.70, of P.T.Sheet No.155 and Survey No.69 to 71 of P.T. Sheet No.155 of City Survey in favour of the applicant within 60 days and failing which it is directed that the sale deed shall be executed under order XXI Rule 34 of C.P.C. The Judgment Debtor challenges this order by filing this writ petition. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the Commissioner should be appointed for execution of the sale deed and to find out the area to be conveyed to the plaintiff under a sale deed. There is no substance in the submission made by the learned Counsel. The final order passed by the Court in the Civil Suit is very clear which directs the defendants to sale the property 12x20.92 (251.04 sq. feet). Since there is direction in favour of the plaintiff, there is no difficulty in executing the sale deed by Judgment Debtor. There is no need to appoint any commissioner for that purpose. There is no substance in the writ petition. It is dismissed in limine. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA