IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38956 of 2007 SANJEEV KUMAR . S/O VIDYA BHUSHAN PRASAD @ CHAUDHARY, R/O VILL- HUSAINPUR, P.S. RAHUI, DIST. NALANDA. --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR . 2. YOGENDRA PRASAD, INSPECTOR OF POLICE , THANA-IN- CHARGE LAHERI POLICE STATION, DIST. NALANDA -- OPP.PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemendra Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 05 16.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks quashing of the cognizance order dated 15.03.2007, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Tr. No. 2840 of 2007 (State vs. Sanjiv Kumar & ors,) whereby on the strength of supplementary charge sheet, learned Magistrate, on goring through the materials placed along with the same, has found that there is a prima facie case against the petitioner who was charge sheeted. Accordingly cognizance has been taken.. Learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing the order submits that there was no inducement made on his part and consequent whereof the property/cash amount was made over to him. It is submitted that allegations made against him are remote, vague and not capable of being proved at the trial. Learned trial Court was not justified in taking cognizance. Learned A.P.P., on the other hand, supported the impugned order. It is stated that apart from other Sections of Penal 2 Code the petitioner is also facing charge under Section 120 B of the Penal Code. I have perused the F.I.R. and the order taking cognizance. Considering the confines of the jurisdiction invoked by the Court below, I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. However, having regard to the submissions advanced at the Bar, this Court grants liberty to agitate all these grievance(s) at the appropriate stage of the proceeding. The application is dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)