{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4163 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.327 OF 2009 Minal w/o Rajesh Sakhare & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS Rajesh s/o Anant Sakhare RESPONDENT ....... Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for applicants Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for respondent ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 21 st January 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of 5 days’ delay in preferring criminal revision challenging the judgment and order dated 13.08.2009 passed by the Family Court, Aurangabad. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln4163-09 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.327 OF 2009 Minal w/o Rajesh Sakhare & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS Rajesh s/o Anant Sakhare RESPONDENT ....... Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for applicants Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for respondent ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 21 st January 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to respondent. Mr.Mukhedkar, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. This revision to be tagged with Criminal Revision Application No.224/2009. S.O. 04.03.2010. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln4163-09 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2836 OF 2007 Rajesh s/o Anant Sakhare APPLICANT VERSUS Minal w/o Rajesh Sakhare & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for applicant Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondents ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 21 st January 2010 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicant has challenged interim order passed below Exhibit-21 in Maintenance Petition No.117/2006, which was pending on the file of Family Court, Aurangabad. Now, the Maintenance Petition No.117/2006 is decided finally vide judgment dated 13.08.2009 and the said order is challenged by way of revision application No.224/2009 by the applicant, this application does not survive and stands disposed of as infructuous. Rule stands discharged. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln4163-09 {4} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 224 OF 2009 Rajesh s/o Anant Sakhare APPLICANT VERSUS Minal w/o Rajesh Sakhare & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, Advocate for applicant Mr.P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondents ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 21 st January 2010 PER COURT: 1. As present respondents have filed Criminal Revision Application Stamp No.327/2009, this revision to be heard along with the same. S.O. to 04.03.2010. Call R & P. 2. Applicant Rajesh is directed to deposit an amount of Rs.7500/- towards arrears payable to respondent No.2, within a period of 15 days from today in the trial court and to produce receipt of the same before this Court. Applicant Rajesh is further directed to regularly deposit an amount of Rs.1500/- towards maintenance of Kalyani on 5 th of every month in the family court. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln4163-09