IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11373 of 2011 BHOLA RAI, SON OF SAHATU RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 04.01.2011 in connection with Nawanagar Basudeva (O.P.) P.S. Case No. 02 of 2011 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code in which the petitioner has been made named accused. Although, the informant as well as his son have claimed to have identified the petitioner committing the alleged crime but contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been roped in this case on account of village politics and so far as the antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, except one case i.e. Sikraul P.S. Case No. 03 of 2009 for the offences under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, no other case has been lodged against the petitioner but learned Additional Sessions Judge has committed error on record mentioning this fact that petitioner had been made accused earlier in the case of loot. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties coupled with period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with above stated Nawanagar Basudeva (O.P.) P.S. Case No. 02 of 2011. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )