THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P. No. 515 of 2003 Dated. 27–01-2011 Between: T. Ratna Raju …Petitioner Vs. A.P.S.R.T.C. rep., by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 515 of 2003 ORAL ORDER: The writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 09-12-2002 of the 3rd respondent whereby the petitioner was disengaged from services from the post of Conductor which he was serving since 31-03-1998 though on a daily wage basis. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by an office Order No.P1/255(16)/07—JRG dated 22-10-2007, the petitioner’s services as a Casual Conductor in the Jangareddygudem depot along with thirty (30) other Casual Conductors, has been regularized and with effect from 05-10-2007. In the light of these orders, the grievance of the petitioner does not subsist is the contention by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as ‘infructuous’. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 27-01-2011 Pvks/*