s»».: '.^ \. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAntSGARM : BILASPUR fDMSION BENCH1 CORAM : Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ Hon'ble Shri D.R. Deshmukh, J. APPELLANT APPLICANT RESPONDENTS Misc.ADpeal No. 1382 OF Dileshwar @ Raju Dewangan S/6 Balaram, R/o. Post. Ghoorsena, P.S. Nandghat. Dlst. Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. Sartaj Khan. S/o. tetam Khan. Aged about 28 yeare, R/o. Viyage & P.8. Nwara, Dtst. Nagpur, Maharashtra 2. Jasbinder Singh Sainy S/o. Shri Bayant Singh Sainy Aged about 42 year, R/o. 173 Ashok Nagar, P.S. Pachpoli Nagpur, Maharasfra 3. National Insurance Co. Ltd. 10-Vardhman Nagar - 271103 Nagpur, Maharasfra Present Shri SudhirVerma, leamed counsel forthe appellant. ORALORDER (Passed on 10m of January 2006) The following Order ofth®Court was presed by D.R. Oeshmukh, J: In this appeal, leamed counsel for the appellant has contenctod that the MACT has wrongly held that the app^tant contributed to the aecident and has apportloned the compensatlon assessed at Rs. 1,52,369/- to flfty per cent. W®hav®gone through the impugned award and from paras 8 & 9, we find that the appeltant whlle going on his motwcycto was required to iake right tum for going to village Ghoorsena. Leamed MACT has, on a'@^;tt®i@i .^^^^^•^^l - i. -<- ^ appreciation ofevidence.rightly come to the condusfon that the appeBant whUe doing so contributed to theaccldent and has rightly apportioned th® compensation assessed. (2) Inourconsicteredoplnion.thecompensationawarctedbyttie MACT does not call for any tnterference. The appeal is devoid cyf substance and it is accordingty dismtesed. re Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^. ^-s <--