IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18423 of 2009 CHITRANJAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that SIM card of the petitioner was used in mobile set of Santosh Yadav while Pappu Kumar was found in possession of SIM Card of stolen mobile, now has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court. He was in custody since 11.12.2008 while this petitioner is in custody since 9.12.2008 and is entitled for the same relief. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureteis of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in Ghosi P.S.Case No. 24 of 2008. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI