IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No. 39 of 2011. Decided on: 13.5.2011 Anil Kumar & others ……….Petitioners. Versus Upinder Kumar & others. ……….Respondents. ____________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ______________________________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) CMP No. of 2011. It is jointly represented by the parties that the matter has been settled between the parties amicably outside the Court. They have also filed an application under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recording the compromise. The same is permitted to be taken on record. The Registry is directed to assign the number to the application. It stands disposed of. C.R. No.39 of 2011. In view of the terms and conditions annexed with the application, the present Revision Petition is dismissed. In other words, the order of eviction is upheld. The parties are directed to 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No abide by the terms and conditions annexed alongwith the application, which shall also form an integral part of the judgment. 2. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 13, 2011. (hl)