1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.813 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1015 OF 2010 Bharatiya Minorities Suraksha ..Appellants Mahasangh & anr. V/s. Balaji Motion Pictures & ors ..Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Advocate, for the Appellants Mr.Virag Tulzapurkar & Ms.Sowmya Srikrishna i/b.S.R.Rawell & Co., Advocate, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr.Vineet Naik, Mr.Shreyas Mehta i/b.Apex Consillis, Advocate, for Respondent No.4 CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 28TH JULY, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for both the parties. 2. The Trial Judge has already noted that the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 may release the film by showing at the beginning of the film that this film has absolutely no resemblance 2 with the life of the late Mr. Haji Mastan Mirza. In addition, the learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 states that his client would issue press release stating as under :- It is denied that the film Once Upon A Time in Mumbai-When It All Started , is based on the life of the late Mr. Haji Mastan Mirza. The Respondents have never represented before any one including the press that the film is based on the life of the late Mr. Haji Mastan Mirza. This film is purely a work of fiction and the characters in the film are fictional and do not represent any individual, whether living or dead. 3. This press release would be released today itself and the Appellants would be at liberty to circulate as many as copies to as many as persons he wishes to circulate. Release would be sent to the prominent daily news papers by name Times of India , Loksatta , Maharashtra Times , Indian 3 Express and press club by 6.00 P.M. and a copy would be provided to the learned Counsel for the Respondents by 6.00 P.M. today. 4. In view of this, Appeal from Order is disposed of. 5. In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, Civil Application No.1015 of 2010 does not survive and the same is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)