1 wp943.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 943 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Heard. 2. Yesterday before proceeding to dismiss Writ Petition, time was given to petitioner to make statement whether to show his bonafide he is ready and willing to deposit some amount towards compensation as claimed in M.A.C.T. Today, learned Counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay only reasonable cost. 3. Learned M.A.C.T. has for valid reasons found it 2 wp943.11 proper not to recall order of "No W.S." passed about three years back. The petitioner has failed to make out any exceptional reason sufficient to warrant such recall. I do not notice any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is rejected. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 15.02.2011 gas/wp943.11