IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.565 of 2008 BHART NANDAN JHA, son of Late Gokul Nand Jha, resident of village Pareya Bathua, P.S. Kurhani, District Muzaffarpur ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur. 2. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 3. Manager, Punjab National Bank, J.L. Road, Muzaffarpur. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 16.4.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur as respondent no.4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent-State and the Accountant General as also the Bank. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is although receiving the family pension commencing from 26th of April, 1998 vide P.P.O. No.476735 consequent upon the death of his wife, who was a Teacher in Primary School, Pareya Bathna, District Muzaffarpur, but the admissible dearness relief over the said basic family pension is not being paid to him despite decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Shardha Devi Vrs. State of Bihar, reported in 2002(3) PLJR 527. The learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for 2 the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.2). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the aforesaid grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. However, upon consideration, if the claim of the petitioner is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)