IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20507 of 2010 1. UPENDRA YADAV 2. Tarun Kumar Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that the assailants are otherwise named as Ashok Yadav and Viveka Yadav while he was simply a member of the mob. It appears that co-accused with common allegations as a member of the unlawful assembly has been granted regular bail in Cr. Misc. No.9872 of 2010 The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered on its own merits including grant of bail to similarly situated co- accused, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)