IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39732 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also for the complainant. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 498A, 323 and 379 of I.P.C. Learned counsels for both sides submit that their clients are not averse to revival of matrimonial harmony. In fact, the petitioner has subsequently filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights. In the absence of any heinous allegations, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of five months upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand ) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran in Complaint Case No.1697 of 2007. If during this period, based on any subsequent developments, either in the complaint case 2 or in the restitution matter, the petitioner presents himself physically and surrenders to the jurisdiction of the court below and prays for regular bail, the court below shall not be inhibited from considering the same in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the limited grant of anticipatory bail by this Court. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)