IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.20046 of 2011 Date of Decision: 31.10.2011 Gurudwara Shri Guru Singh Sabha and others ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, ACJ. 1. The dispute raised by the petitioners against respondent Nos.5 & 6 is purely of civil nature. The issues have to be determined by adducing evidence by the parties for which the remedy of filing a civil suit in the Court of competent jurisdiction would be more appropriate. It is not possible to hold a trial in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution even against a statutory body like respondent No.5. The petitioners may avail the remedy of filing the civil suit as per law. 2. The writ petition is held to be not maintainable. 3. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE 31.10.2011 manju