1 S.B.Criminal Misc. (SOS)Application No.65/2010 in S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No.243/2010 (Amar Veer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of Order : 23.03.2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.Jitendra Mitrucka, for the petitioner-applicant. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. Mr.Keshav Agrawal, for the respondent No.2. By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant, learned P.P. as well as learned counsel for the respondent No.2 on the application for suspension of sentence. Petitioner-applicant Amarveer Singh s/o Shri Raghuveer Singh was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate No.23, Jaipur City, Jaipur under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in Complaint Case No.759/2006 and the maximum sentence imposed upon him is two years' simple imprisonment along with compensation of Rs.15,00,000/-. Against this judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the petitioner-applicant has filed the above mentioned revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant submits that matter has been compromised between the parties and in view of the aforesaid, a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- has already been paid and remaining amount of Rs.12,50,000/- would be 2 paid within a period of three months and to this effect, the compromise deed has been executed but it could not be signed by the accused-petitioner, as he is behind the bars. It is stated that accused-petitioner will sign the compromise deed immediately on his release and will make the payment of remaining amount to complete the compromise. Thus, it is prayed that sentence imposed upon the petitioner-applicant may be suspended. Consequently, this application is allowed and it is ordered that sentence imposed against the petitioner-applicant Amarveer Singh s/o Shri Rabhuveer Singh by the trial court shall remain suspended provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) together with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance in this Court on 26.04.2010 and whenever called upon to do so. However, it is made clear that if petitioner makes default in making payment of remaining amount, then the matter would be heard and decided finally on the next date fixed. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. preety