.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.665 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.546 OF 2007 Anil alias Manick Ramchandra Sathe. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Mr.K.S.Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the Respondent-State. .. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : APRIL 03, 2008. DATED : APRIL 03, 2008. DATED : APRIL 03, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. The learned Counsel contended that applicant was on bail during the course of trial. The applicant has been convicted under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. Argument was advanced as to the evidence of PW-5 who is a child witness. After considering the same, prima facie, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)