IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.928 of 2008 LALIT NARAYAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 19.9.2008 As per the order of this Court, the counsel for the Corporation has handed over the payment due to the petitioner by cheque numbered as “298833” in Court by which an amount of Rs. 4,32,000/- has been paid. The petitioner claims that the total due is Rs. 5,75,410/- and it is said that he was already paid Rs. 16,000/-. Therefore, there is a discrepancy about 1,27,000/- between the dues which has been admitted by the Corporation and that of the petitioner. It is further submitted that this amount has been paid after making certain deductions. In any any event the order of this Court has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner has certain objections with respect to the payment, he may move the authority concerned, bringing to his attention statement of dues and if the authority finds the accounts so produced by the petitioner are correct, then payment ought to be made to the petitioner forthwith. 2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation submits that the total amount of the contractors had been released in pursuance of an award. It is submitted that the State Government has challenged the award in a suit. This Court however, is not concerned with the result of this suit. Undoubtedly the parties will be bound by the judgment in the suit. This contempt application is thus disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)