-_—..*_.— -HC-22 sn^i'^1 R-ii'* an^r ?h+1f* tlf?^t -ysi ^|^|<>|A|, 0fl1«<ie. ItMl^y 3ff^[ tf^SK ^P(£5A/°- "WI. 200 HW711 9r(n9) |cl*<itT" 31lt?T ^RIIWdfStT PETITCONER Hanum(int Singh Si&diya, aged about 61 year-s, son of L.a'te B. Sisodiya, r-etirsd l-ecture!', District Educot|on cnd Training Institute (Zila Shiksha Evcm Prashitjshan Sonstha), &hai*dffljaigarh, Diat. Raigarh, Reside^it of Civil Lines, Tohsii Dharcmjaigarh, t>ist. i(C6) SESPONDENTS: (Wr-it Petition under Arti( S^B^HON'Bj.E_SHRI &HIRa4&RA ctiiAft<n<4)'1 *<p-tc?f ^ Ts^ <(<i+$i< ^? aiptflf SD^T Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, throuah the Secretary, Depar^ment of School Education, bou Kaiyan Singh {Snawaif. Raipur, (CG) 2. The f}r'incipal, District Education and Trainmg Institijte (Zila Shiksha Evam Prashikshan Sansthc), &hat'a4Jaigt2r'h, Dist. Raigar-h (CS) 3. The J((int Director, Trsasury, Accounts and Pension, Biiasp4'(C6) 4. The Di^trict Treasury Officer, Distt. ISaigarh (C6) c!e 226 of the Constitution of India) JSSHR^J, Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate Mr. Ar-un Soo, Sovt. Advoca') Heard. TTlis petition is directed 20.11.2007 passed by the Joint t)ii|'« whereby a recovery of Rs.40,740^ air-eady been retired from the Learned counse! for the groposing rscovery has besn made •or the petitioner. e for the State/respondents; |against the order of Annexure P-1 dated t)ii|'ector, Treosury, Accounts <& Pension, Biicspur 40^- 'is proposed from the petitioner, who hos : on 31.8.2007. betitioner submitted thort- the above order without affor'ding any opportunity of. heoring [^^fe?r '- • serMices "^w^"" ^ ^ ""'^/ C-22 SII^I'^1 f<-<i.+ SD^T ^*ii^ •^ficf T°? "'llilld''<, aflly'Fii. f'lcii'My 3TI^?T 'W3K VWVll Shlich "^I. 200 fcl.bciiT' SIT^T's^nm ^rfN ^ propc|sed to the petitioner. The petitioner he does not consent to the reply of the petitioner, the p^ petitioner is entitled is not bein9^1 Learned counsel for the Sh Annexure P-1 it would be evideni consent of the petitioner and that he does not consent to circumstqnces, if the petitioner- fespondant No.3 within a period copy of this order, the same shal| in accordance wj+h law within a receipt of the representotion. In view of the submissiorls instant petition is disposed o-j repreaentation, raisin9 all the 9ri| "espondent No.3 along with ceri week from today. On such re^t same sha'l be considered and of six weeks from the dote of re| Certified copy ss per ruie| ^il^tci^l TTFRTf ^ f^^ <f^t^I< '^3rf:OT3n^I (las aiready communicated the respondents that recovery,t)owwer", without considerin9 the tnsion and other retiral dues for which the lishursed. S^ate submits that from perusa! of the order of that recovsry is proposed only cfter obtain'ng jince the petitioner has already coran>unjcated the proposed r'ecovery, therefore, in thase makes a rapr'esentation in this regard before of one week from todoy olon9 with certified be considered and decided by r-espondent No.3 ^ur+her period of six weeks' from the dste of made by learned counsel for the par-ties, the with liber'ty to the petitioner to make a i^vances which ar-e rcised in this petition, before :er-t|ified copy of this or'der within a period of one ^esentction being made by the petitionsr, rtie decfded by rsspondent No.3 within a further period :eipt of the representation. ..-^ ?? [Tft^^fe^