IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 27714 of 2008 Between: K. Srikath, S/o. K. Sriramulu, Virupaksheswara Nagar, Bukkarayasamudram Village and Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3 The Tahsildar, Bukkarayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction mroe one in the nature of Writ of Mandamu declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to acquire the lands for House sites under Indiramma Scheme in Sy.No. 241-8 to an extent of Ac. 1-54 cents of the petitioner in Govindapalli Village, Bukkarayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur District without following procedure established under land Acquisition Act is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Article 14, 21 and 300A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of of the petitioner schedule land in Sy.No. 241-8 to an extent of Ac. 1-54 cents of the petitioner in Govindapalli Village, Bukkayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur District without following due process of law in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.27714 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioner was allegedly assigned land admeasuring Acs.1.54 in survey No.241-8 situated at Govindapalli Village, Bukkarayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur District. He was also given kisan credit card passbook. He alleges that third respondent visited his land with a view to dispossess him for distribution of his land under INDIRAMMA (Integrated Novel Development In Rural Areas and Model Municipal Areas). Therefore, he rushed to this Court seeking injunction against respondents. After perusing material on record and hearing learned counsel, this Court is convinced that the writ petition is filed on mere apprehension by making a vague allegation in para 4 of writ affidavit. Therefore, the writ petition cannot be entertained. However, be it observed that unless and until due process is followed, petitioner cannot be dispossessed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 19th December, 2008 GHN To 1 The District Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3 The Tahsildar, Bukkarayasamudram Mandal, Anantapur District. 4 2CCs to GP for Revenue 5 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}