IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.386 OF 2010 DATED:31.5.2010 Between: Smt. Binkam Saraswathi and others … Appellants And The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration Government of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.386 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) There being involvement of questions of fact, therefore no fault is found with the refusal of the learned single Judge to display interference. Regarding the contention of the learned counsel for the appellants that the expressions in respect of the facts are likely to prejudice the appellants’ rights, we are not inclined to agree because these expressions indicate a prima facie view and nothing more. Let it be clear that the expressions made by the learned single Judge shall not come in the way of the parties and the appropriate forum shall be free to draw its own conclusion of course on the strength of oral and documentary evidence. Disposed of. Status quo for two weeks in respect of subject matter of the lis which shall terminate after expiry of two weeks and the property in dispute shall be governed by the directions of the appropriate forum if any passed. SANJAY KUMAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 31-5-2010 B. Narsinga Rao