IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 33812 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ A.RAMLA BEEVI, W/O ABDUL RASHEED, OZHUPARA THADATHARAKATHU VEEDU, PERINGAMALA, PERINGAMALA P.O., ANAD MURI, PERINGAMALA VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN SMT.N.S.REHNA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, PALODE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO.7862, PALODE, KARUMANCODE P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK. 2. THE SALE OFFICER, PALODE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL & RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., NO.7863, PALODE, KARUMANCODE P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.MANU V. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.33812/07 APPENDIX EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.245/2007 IN COMPLAINT NO.942/2007 OF THE HON'BLE LOK AYUKTA DATED 19.4.2007. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE PAYMENT OF RS.5 LAKHS TO THE R1 BANK. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER IN COMPLAINT NO.942/2007 OF THE HON'BLE LOK AYUKTA DATED 25.9.2007. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.30/2007 OF R4 DATED 3.5.2007. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.33812 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges proceedings for recovery of loan amounts advanced by the 1st respondent to the petitioner, repayment of which was defaulted by the petitioner. By order dated 17.12.2007 this Court had passed the following order. “The petitioner shall report on 1.1.2008 as to whether the petitioner has complied with the conditions in the interim order dated 16.11.2007. Post on 1.1.08. Interim order is extended till then”. By order dated 17.12.2007, I directed the counsel for the petitioner to find out as to whether the conditions in the said order have been complied with. Today the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same has not been complied with. In so far as the liability to pay is not disputed before me, I do not think that the petitioner can be granted any relief in this matter especially when the petitioner has not complied with the orders of the Lok Ayuktha and this Court. All possible relief had been W.P.(c)No.33812/07 2 granted to the petitioner by the Lok Ayuktha and this Court and when the petitioner is not inclined to avail of the same, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c)No.33812/07 3