IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.18228 of 2010 Date of Decision:8.9.2011 Smt. Savitri and others .... Petitioners Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.S. Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record the communication dated 7.9.2011 on behalf of the Chief Administrator HUDA, Panchkula, stating that the promotion of the petitioners have been approved on file by the competent authority on 6.9.2011 and the promotion and posting orders are being issued. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 8.9.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE