d^ ^;^^" ^ ^" ^ ^' THE HON'BI.E HIGH OOJRT OF GHHATTISG&RH AT S BILASR® M.A. NQ. -LSC ^QF 2003.! APPELLANTS ; tg Sm'tai Si.airi.-ta Namdeo, aged 28 years, "1 H-ICANT ^ wife of late Shri Santosh Naneleo, ! %•] Shabhan Kuiaar Namdee, aged 5 years, ^-' SOB of late Shri Santosh Namdeo, ,3e§ Kuaari Mohaniya Namdeo, aged 2years, daaghter e£ late Shri Santosh Naadeo, Appellant no^j 2 and 3 are niiaors through their natoral guardian, the inother, Sa-l<«j Sunita Naadeo wife of late Shri 1 Santosh Namde®, the above appellant, all residents of village Siwni, Poliee Station and Tahsil - Chaapa, Distriet - Janjgir - Champa ( Chhattisgarh ) V..E B. &.U-S aESPONCENTS s ^JJl Santash Senwant,aged 22 year®, > NON - APPLICANI^ ^ .„ . ^_,,^ „_,__...._, / ' sen of.Shri Badku Ram Sonwani, Driver', resident of Bha-fcapara Janjgir, TahsU - Janjgir, District Janjgir - diaapa ( Chha-ttisgarh ) ?.^ Amolak Singh Bhatiya, aged 55 years, son f^ of Shri Harbansh Sxngh Bhatiya, resident ©f Dayalband Bilaspur, Tahstl and District - Bilaspur ( Chhattisgarii ) 3aj The Qriental Insurance Company Llaited, Brancb Office - Dayalband Bilaspoa: ( C.G. ) APPEAL UNEEB SECTIQN f73 OF THE MOTCR «-'' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ?LOK ADALAT) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL N0. 130 of 2003 Appellants : Smt Sunita Namdev & ors. Versus Respondents; 03.03.2007 Santosh Sonwani & others rArisina out of Claim Case No. 21 of 2000) Appellant No.1 - Smt Sunita Namdev in person with and others by Shri Tej Prakash Jaiswal, Advocate. None for respondents N'o.1 & 2. Shri Yogesh Vithalani, Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company with Shri AK Athaley, counsel for respondent No.3. Smt Sunita Namdeo (Appellant No.1) filed an application along with affjdavit for according permission to enter into compromise oh behaif ofthe minor appellants No.2 & 3 with insurance Company. Not opposed. Considered. Allovi'ed. In terms of compromise, award is passed as below:- 1) In addition to compensation already awarded by the Tribunal, respondent No.3 shall pay Rs.1,28,000/- (Rupees one lakh twenty eight thousand) to the appellants. 2) For disbursement and deposit in FDR, the Tribunal may' pass appropriate orders. 3) The amount, if any, kept in deposit vifith Bank shall be payable under the orders ofTribunal in accordance with law. 4) Appellants shall be' entitled to receive interest on the amoupt so deposited, ifany. 5) In view of the above, appeal against respondents No.1 & 2 stands dismissed. 6) Out ofthe above amount, Rs. 1,280/- (Rupees one thousand two hundred and eighty) shall be paid to counsel for the appetlants directly by the Insurance Companytowardscounselfee. . : 7) If the amount av/arded is not deposited within a'period of one month, 'the Insurance Company shall be liable to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum thereafter. : 8) Copy of theaward_shaii'^e_aixen to the parties.free of cost. Sdi/-" - : Justice Vijay'Klimar Sh'rivastava High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur \ Mem5ef- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur