IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 112 of 2009 Sushil Kumar and another ….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the Counter Affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner no.1- Sushil Kumar. It has also been alleged in the counter affidavit that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioner no.2-Sudhir Kumar @ Dabloo. As such, the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Addl. S.P. concerned against the petitioner no.1, whereas, the petitioner no.2 has not been chargesheeted. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report / chargesheet, as the case may be, before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 27.03.2009