IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.21537 of 2011 Date of decision: 21.11.2011 Saroj Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). Only grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that in 2007, she was shown in seniority list below respondents No.5 & 6 despite the fact that she joined the department a day before the said respondents. He submits that for the relief claimed, the petitioner has submitted representation but it was rejected by passing a non-speaking order. He, thus, served legal notice, Annexure P-23. Notice of motion. On asking of the court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice. He submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued for consideration of the legal notice. Under the circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the concerned authority to consider the legal notice, Annexure P-23 and take a decision on the same in case a detailed order has not been passed already. Needful be done within two months from today. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 21.11.2011 'rajpal'