IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 23576 of 2011 (O&M) Hari Partap .. Petitioner vs State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S. K. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal, J. Photostat copy of the certified copy placed on record by the learned counsel for the petitioner in court is taken on record. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 16 dated 22.1.2011 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 470, 506, 120-B IPC at Police Station Khol, District Rewari. The allegations in the FIR is that the petitioner attested a sale- deed as a witness allegedly executed by one Matadin, whereas Matadin had, in fact, expired on 28.7.2003. The sale-deed was executed on 18.10.2005. There was apparent impersonation. Even if the petitioner was not a beneficiary, as is sought to be claimed by his counsel, still keeping in view that on his identification sale- deed pertaining to the property of one Matadin was registered, whereas he had already expired, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 5.8.2011 (Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge