epfr^ IN THE COURT QF lUDICATtlRE AT BILASPLTR (C.G4 ca) w^ ^-(&l3 •3-*-S-£--ES-»3--Bfr*S»*f-li T5T?TTiTrT1T^~^'^ T vtsi.'ti'iur ^^> ^^^/ <^\y.-^r. .•••^e^" ^•-''^\v\y' •^•'^'"•^•••" ^•1 :>i-—iT\TT^T <ESFUN1 ^Jiyalal, aged Aout 68 years, S/o Fagu Singh, at present R/o Raipura, Tahsil & District- Dindori (M.P.) Versus / IBouth LiiTated Persona] Eastern Coalfiled .hrough t Chief G.M. -S_Pt^TT^^ Ottice, Korba Disuict - ^)rba /f'^r'.'i ll^U) •? Prin/,«ns,1 Kf Rnc /z. l-'nncipai, tsasic tu^gu-teenng 'iraining lnstitu.tc South Eastern Coalfiled, Korba 3istt.- Korba (C< 'cc^ 2-26 OF THE CONST ISSUANCT OF OF lr HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR S.B. : HON'BLEMR.SATISHK.AGNmOTRLJ. WMT PETITION (S.) N0.4819 OF 2006 ^ Petitioner Jiyalal Respondents versus South Eastem Coalfiled Limited and another Present : Mr. Vishnu Koshte, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.S.Koshy, counsel for the respondents. ORDER ;di (Passed on 5UI ofSeptember, 2006) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner was working as Carpenter in the office of respondent No.2. The petitioner has availed voluntary retirement scheme at his own request and was granted voluntery retirement with effect from 7-3-1993. Admittedly, the pension scheme introduced by respondentNo.l came into force with effect from 1- 4-1994. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed tiiis \ _ t, petition seeking a direction against tiie respondents to grant benefit ofthe pensionscheme, which came into force with effect from 1-4- 1994. 2. Be that as it may, fhe facts remain that the petitioner stood retired voluntarily with effect from 7-3-1993 availing voluntary retirement scheme at his own request. The new pension scheme, which was introduced and made applicable from 1-4-1994, cannot be extended to the petitioner and scheme was not applicable wifh retrospective effect. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner has not made out a case for grant ofany indulgence by tfais Court in exercise ofits power under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia. 4. costs. The petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge Gopal