IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5317 of 2008. Decided on: 06.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 to 7 ex-parte. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition has become infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 06, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?