IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11288 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ C.ANTONY, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, AGED 37 YEARS, PEON, S.H.U.P.SCHOOL, CHULLIMANOOR, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE HEADMASTER, S.H.U.P.SCHOOL, CHULLIMANOOR, NEDUMANGAD. 2. PRIVATE SCHOOL EMPLOYEES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD. NO.T-369, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE SALE OFFICER, PRIVATE SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD., NO.T.369, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11288 OF 2009 (E) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P1, a notice issued by the 2nd respondent informing that if the loan is not closed as stated in Ext.P1, the 2nd respondent will take coercive action. 2. In my view, Ext.P1 by itself does not give any cause of action to the petitioner. It only informs the petitioner that if the loan is not closed, coercive action will be taken. Petitioner can have cause of action only if any coercive action is taken and that too only if such coercive action is not in accordance with law. As at present, I see no merit in the contentions raised. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp