1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2581 OF 1995 1. MAHEDO SANSTHAN WADALI THR. ITS TRUSTEES .. PETITIONER/S VERSUS 1. CHARITY COMMISSIONER & OTHERS .. RESPONDENT/S ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. R. Deshpande Adv for petitioner. Ms. Raskar Adv for respondent-4. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 5 th JULY, 2010. Heard. Rule was issued on 6th November 1997 with a direction to put up with Writ Petition No. 250 of 1997. After substantially arguing the matter, the 2 learned counsel for writ petitioner has referred to earlier proceedings decided on 30th March 1974 by the Agricultural Land Tribunal (ALT) Amravati. However, the facts remains that the learned Member of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal by his order dated 6th February 1995 found that the required aspects were not diligently and in tune were considered by the learned S. D. O. The learned Member rightly directed S. D. O. to hold enquiry about the details indicated by him (MRT) and order of remand to the learned S. D. O. was passed and setting aside the order of S. D.O. dated 28th January 1997. The order of learned Member MRT does not require any interference. The learned S. D. O. after remand will independently consider the effect and fruits of the order of Agricultural Land Tribunal dated 30th March 1974. Writ petition dismissed with above observations. JUDGE svk 3