THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No. 235 of 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per T. Meena Kumari, J) The Writ Appeal was ﬁled challenging the orders of the learned Single Judge passed in Writ Petition No. 31144 of 1998, dated 12.10.2000 directing the appellant to appoint the 1st respondent as a Conductor afresh without recognition of the services and also the seniority. The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant- Corporation has contended that on the earlier occasion also, the respondent has ﬁled a Writ Petition No.5486 of 1991 questioning the same award and the said Writ Petition was dismissed without prejudice to his right to pursue the review application. In view of the fact that earlier the Writ Petition has been ﬁled and the appellant submitted that the said Writ Petition was withdrawn which is not a factual one. Under the above circumstances, we are of the opinion that the Order of learned Single Judge directing the reinstatement of the 1st respondent as a fresh candidate is liable to be set aside and accordingly, it is set aside. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is allowed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J _______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 8.7.2008 CHV