In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl.M.No. M-25574/2010(O&M) Date of decision: 1.9.2010. Deepinder Partap Singh Bhadhauria and others ....................Petitioners. v. State of Haryana and others .....................Respondents. Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh. Present:- Mr.R.N. Ojha, Advocate for the petitioners. Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral). Prayer under Section 482 Cr.PC is for quashing of order dated 6.7.2010 passed by the learned JMIC, Faridabad whereby the petitioners have been summoned to face trial in a criminal complaint filed by Smt. Prashansha @ Rinki-respondent no.2 under section 494, 120-B IPC. As per allegations respondent no.2 was married with petitioner no.1 Deepinder Partap Singh Bhadhauria on 26.5.2003 and out of this wedlock a female child was born on 6.2.2006. Later on matrimonial dispute arose between complainant and petitioner no.1 and an FIR in this regard was lodged by the complainant-respondent no.2. It is alleged that petitioner no.1 without obtaining the decree of divorce from any court of law has performed marriage with petitioner no.2 Smt. Priyanka Devi @ Seema on 13.11.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that false allegations have been made in the complaint regarding the marriage of petitioner no.1 with petitioner no.2 and that in fact she is wife of one Amit son of Rajesh Singh resident of Uttar Pradesh. Reference in this regard has been made to Annexure P-6, alleged marriage certificate signed by Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Biriea Thukran Ramabai Nagar, Kanpur Rural and Annexure P-7 which is a photocopy of marriage invitation card regarding the marriage of petitioner no.2 with said Amit son of Rajesh Singh. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the impugned order, I find no ground to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the complainant-respondent No.2 has deposed about the re-marriage of petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2 without taking any divorce from her (complainant). In support of her allegations, she examined one Shankar Singh as CW2. In addition to that, she also produced on record a Certificate (Ex.C2) issued by Sarpanch of village Biria Ghadewa regarding marriage of petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2, and a photocopy of marriage invitation card. It is on the basis of this oral as well as documentary evidence led by the complainant- respondent No.2 that learned JMIC, Faridabad found that a prima facie case under Sections 494 and 120-B IPC was made out against the petitioners and accordingly, they have been summoned in the aforesaid complaint. In view of the above, no case for interference is made out. Dismissed. 1.9.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge