IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1320 of 2009 1. Lakshman Prasad Gupta @ Lakshman Prasad Sah, son of late Hira Lal Sah. 2. Sweta Kumari @ Sita Kumari, daughter of Lakshman Prasad Gupta @ Lakshman Prasad Sah. 3. Sima Kumari @ Sima Devi, daughter of Lakshman Prasad Gupta @ Lakshman Prasad Sah. 4. Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Sah, son of Lakshman Prasad Gupta @ Lakshman Prasad Sah. 5. Chintu Kumar Sah @ Chintu Kumar, son of Lakshman Prasad Gupta @ Lakshman Prasad Sah. 6. Usha Devi, wife of Lakshman Prasad Gupta @ Lakshman Prasad Sah. 7. Sangita Devi, wife of Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Sah. (All resident of village- Hariharganj, Nasariganj, P.S.- Nasariganj, District- Rohtas) ………Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Ishwar Chandra Sah, son of Late Mukund Sah, resident of Nasariganj, P.S.-Nasariganj, District- Rohtas. ……Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 19.09.2011 The accused-petitioners have preferred this revision application against the order dated 1.07.2009 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in Complaint Case No.30/2009 by which a prima facie case has been found against them for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 379 and 504 of the I.P.C. Heard Mr. Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, the learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and Dr. Ravindra 2 Kumar, the learned A.P.P. for the State. From perusal of the materials on record, it appears that the learned Magistrate has considered the complaint petition as well as the evidence produced on behalf of the complainant. After considering the evidence, the learned Magistrate has found that no case is made out against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 149, 384 and 386 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has only found a prima facie case against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 379 and 504 of the I.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners may raise their grievance before the learned Magistrate at the time of framing of charges. This order will not prejudice either of the parties. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)