N' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BIIASPUR Writ Petition (Sl No. 1686 of3007 PBTITIONBR RESPONDBNTS Shiv Charan Ram S/o Late Shri Mukteshwar Rain, Aged about 42 years, PresenUy Working as Juruor Assistant, R/o Rmg Road Namanakala, Rajeev Nagar, Ambikapur, Sarguja C.G. Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through fhe Secretary, Department of Civil Supplies, Manta-alaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipm' (C.G.) 2 Chhattisgarh State Civil SuppUes, Corporation Lunited, Raipur Through Managmg Director, Raipur, C.G. 3 General Manager (Admirustration), Chhattisgarh State CivU Supplies, Corporation Limited Raipi.ur, C.G. 4 District Manager, Chhattisgarh State CivU Supplies Corporation Lunited, Ambikapur, C.G. Writ Petition uader Article 226 ofthe Constitutlpaof India Appearance: Shri Alok Dewangan, coLmsel tbr the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1. Shri B.D. Guru, counsel for respondents No. 2, 3 & 4. ORALORDEK (16.04.2008) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heard. The petitioner, who is an einployee of Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporatiori Limited, has filed this writ petition for fhe foUowtng relief: ^' W.P^S) No. 1686 of2007 "7.1 This Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for entlre records from the office of the respondents in respect of petitioner's claim. 7.2 The Hont>le court may kindly be pleased to dlrect fhe Respondents to reconsider aQ. fhe orders and rejection of representation in reference of Circular dated 06/08/03. 7.3 The Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to follow the procediire laid down in fhe Circiilar dated 06/08/03 in respect offhe petitioner. 7.4 That, the HonTsle corirt may kindly be pleased to restrain the respondents from harassing fhe petitioner in service. 7.5 That, fhe Honlile court may kindly be pleased to direct fhe respondents to provide Ctie cost of fhe petition and other expenses suffered by the petitioner with compensation for undue siiffering. 7.6 That, any other Writ, order, dtrections or reBef wtiich this HonT3le Court may fit may kindly be passed tn favour of the petitioner." Thus in substance the writ .petition has been flled for direction to the respondents to re-consider all the orders and rejection of representation in reference to circular dated 6.8.2003 and to follow the procedure laid down tn circular dated 6.8.2003 (Annexure-P/2). Return has been filed on behatf of respondents No. 2, 3 & 4. In Para-14 of fhe retum, these respondents have (" ^SSi^^^^^^^^^^^i &S^^^^^ WJ'.rSl No. 16S6 of2007 stated that fhfy have hi^tiest regards tcwards thc circular dated 06.08.2003 (Annexure-P/2) aad they are fiiffly complying the circular dated 06.08.2003. They have mentioned fhat in the instant writ petition there is no averment and allegation re^Tding any o&cer who, by knowingty that the petitioner belon^ to SC, is gying series of mhuman treatment or harassment to the petititmer. Tbey have specifically mentioaed that the acttons taken against fhe petitioner was due to misconduct in the service. During the course of arguments, leanied couiMel for the pedtioner also could not make out a case for issuance of any particular direction to tte respondentswith referCTtce to any specific grievance raised by the petitioner. The aBeg@.tions and the reliefi(s) are vague and gpnei^l. In view of the above facts and circtimstances <rf the case, whea no speci&c cause or grievance of the petitioner has been shown by leamed counsel for the petitioner, a general direction to re-cousider aU fhe orders and rejection of representation (the details of which have not been meartloned in the relief column of the petition) caiinot be issued to the respondents. More so, when the respondents have stated on oath that they are following the procedure laid down in fhc circuiar dated 06.08.2003. The petition has no merit, the samc is accordingly disinissed. However, if so advised, the petitton is free to ffle a separate writ petition pleading his @ievances specfficafly and praying speci&c reUefi[s) in relafion to the cai-ise of action whatsoever h^anseninfavoiirofthepetitiona'. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti