' ys ^^ :€. Tumane HtQHCOURTOFCHMATTISGARHATBILASPUR SinalaBench : Hon'bleShri DilKt'Iteosaheb Deshmukh. <J. Misceilaneous Appeal f c)N6.780 of 2007 Appellants Claimante M.K.- Mohan.@ MoBare, S/o M. Krishna, Aged about 22^years, R/o Housing Board Colony,, Industrial Area, Bhilai, Tahsil & DistricfDurg (C.G.) Versus , • • Resoondents Non-applicants 1. . Chandradlp Singh,; Occypation Vehfcte Qualis cwner, R?o Quarter No.10-R, Street No.5, .Sector.2,'BMilai Nagar, Tahsil & DistricfDuig(C:G.) 2. The NatipnalflnsuranceCompanyLimited, Branch ptfice' Bhilai, ^Thtoug{i Oivisional Manage^ Bivisional Qffice, M^birt Maha), G.E.Road,RaipuF(G.G.) I Miscellaneous AppealunderSection 173.0fMotor VehicleAct. ; Present : •ShriS.C.Verma.counseifortheappetlant. :. ORALORDER , • •:1 - (Paaed on •It" Etecember, 200T) l-1eard onadmission. , (2) The appeliant is aggrieved by the award clated2'rt FebFuary, 2007 passed by ihe 11m Additional Motor Aocidents Clalms TCburial, (F.T.C.),' Durg in Olaim case No.51ff006wherebythecompensationofRS.23,000/-hasbeenawardedinaninju[y case. • ' • : :• - (3) Learned counsel for the appellant/olaimant is unabteto poiritout any grourKt for enhancement of eompensation or infirmity Or illegallty in the impugned award passedbytheMotorAccidentsClaimsTribynal.cluringthecouraeofatguments. ••'^••••. ." '.. -- ,. .'• \.::; .:\ '.; ' '.' •". •:;• (4) In this view of the matter, 1 am of obnsfclered opinion: that there fs no substance inthisappealwhichisaccordinglydismissed atthestage,ofadmissi6n. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge