IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Misc.No.10826 of 2012 & Civil Writ Petition No.14734 of 2012 Date of Decision: August 14, 2012 Upasana Sharma & another ...Petitioners Versus Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ashish Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Civil Misc.No.10826 of 2012 Documents taken on record. Application disposed of. Civil Writ Petition No.14734 of 2012 The petitioners have raised disputed questions of fact in regard to their assessment done by the committee constituted for assessing them for suitability to the admission to Ph.D. Course. The petitioners have been declared unqualified. By referring to some communication addressed by the Guide, petitioners have approached this court to say that there was some manipulation in the result by which the petitioners have been held to be unqualified. Since these disputed questions would require to be proved before any relief can be granted, it would be appropriate for the petitioners to have their remedy of filing a civil suit, where all these assertions can be made & proved. I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction to decide the disputed questions of fact. Dismissed. August 14, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE