IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2008 / 14TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29299 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ATHIRA R.P., SAROVARAM, NALLALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).29299/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 6th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has completed her B.Tech Course from the Institute of Engineering and Technology, affiliated to the Calicut University. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper, “Digital System Design” in the 8th Semester Examination, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 8th Semester B.Tech Examination in “Digital System Design”. Her application for revaluation is pending before the respondents since 2.9.2008. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to W.P.(C).29299/2008 2 the 8th Semester B.Tech Examination, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs