IN THEY HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONR E RESPONDENTS 1. 2. / 3./ (CG) WRIT PETITION (S! NO. “\w [2010 WRIT PETITION UIA 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, / Smt. Purnima Mishra aged about 42 years, wife of Shri Alok Mishra, occupation Upper Division Teacher, Presently working as Lecturer — Maharani Laxmi Bai Govt Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Officer, Distt.Bilaspur (CG) A/c & Pension), Bilaspur (CG) Distt. Education Joint Director (Treasury, WWW’?@3MM§9)12OO % «311%?!m (Wu) mmm mm$fzé¥mn amimm B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Moha 05-08-2010 Shri A. N‘ Bhakta, counsel fort e petitioner. Shri Vinocl Tekam, Panel La er for the State/respondents on advance copy‘ Heard. S n ‘ hrivastava Lgarned counsei appearing f r the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of she having passed B. Ed. examinatio before her appointment at her own cost it is submitted that the issue in olved in the present petition is no ionger res integra and the same has een finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha axena vs. State of MP. & Ors., 2009 (ill) MPJR (SC) 59. it is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar View in his ord r dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.5257 of 2008. Learned co nsel for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order dated 2g-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon he judgment ofthe Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) a d the order passed bythis Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, rections have been issued for consideration of the case for grant ftwo advance increments as per circular da'ted 21 -09-1974 issued by t e State of Madhya‘iPradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the etition. Learned counsel for the resp ndents submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. ‘ J. i WW..wi€§:.‘..C§..:2m..‘.i.§£2).19“ 200 o Mm (Wm *L" 52 w \. WWW'a'WW $aémm mmm Tumane In view of the statement ma disposed of with a direction to the resp decide the claim of the petitioner for gi per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued after verification of the facts pleaded in weeks from today. ;-wan Manindra Mohan Shrivastav Judge Sd/— > J de above, this petition is finally pndent authorities to consider and rant of two advance increments as by the State of Madhya Pradesh, the petition within a period of eight a