THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.3489 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and therefore no further adjudication is necessary. The Wit Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 16.06.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.3489 of 2006 Between: Dharam Vijay Kumari W/o.Sarveshwar Rao, aged about 37 years, Sarpanch, Moturu Gram Panchayat, Gudivada, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (P.W) Krishna, Machilipatnam 2 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Gudivada, Krishna District 3 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Gudivada, Krsihna District 4 The Govt. of A.P. rep. by its Prl. Secretary to Govt., Panchayat Raj & Rural Dev. (PTS - II) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 28-2-2006 in WPMP 4672 of 2006 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining G.O.Rt.No.2055 dated 7.11.2005 along with the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No.106/05 P.5 dated 14.7.2005 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to quash the same pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mrs. Y.ANUPAMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Mr. M. Prabhakara Rao. The Court made the following: