IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8733 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Bhago Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. None for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 to the post of Part-Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Loharli, Tehsil Amb, District Una. The suitability of petitioner as well as respondent No.5 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has secured 15 marks and respondent No.5 has secured 22 marks. 2. Merit of the petitioner and respondent No.5 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. There is no merit in 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - the contention of the petitioner that her services could not be terminated on the basis of letter dated 1st September, 2001. Petitioner has not placed any document on record to conclusively prove that she was ever appointed by the Parents Teachers Association or by the Gram Panchayat. The petitioner has not been awarded any marks for viva. She has been shown absent. There is no material on record to suggest that she had, in fact, appeared before the Selection Committee except Annexure A-5, dated 15.4.2007. Petitioner should have filed this document with her petition. 3. Accordingly, in view of the above discussion and observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (sck).