G ‘IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No. (2%?- [2005 $§m§h ‘émmk Bhagvvandas Dwivedi S/o Shri Bala Prasad Dwivédi, aged’abmit 45 years, Revenue Inspector, Land Records, Collectorate, Dakshin Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). w‘e" Wayw§LxJ w , Resnonden‘ts 1. Union of India, Through The Secretary, Department of Personal 82; Training, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through—Secretary, Department of Revenue, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, . D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Collector Dakshin Bastar Dantewada, (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India XI-HC—22 HW,W§,W m 5.4.2005 5hri Sachin Singh Rqjpuf, counsel ‘for- The pefi'riongr. 5hri R. 5. BagheL Addifiopal Cen’rml 60w. Sfanding Counsel Takes noi‘ice on i behalf of respondenf No.1. Shri Sudhir- Agrawal, Panel Lawyer fakes no?ice'“o’n behalf af responden‘l' No.3 & 4. By 1'his wr-H' pefifion under Ar-ficle 226/227 of The Consfi'l‘ufion of India fhe pefifione’r‘ has prayed for issu ce of wri‘f of mandamus for alIocaTion of The pefi'rioner's servi‘ce To ‘the Sfa‘re of r .P. The pefifioner's case is Th he was appointed as Patwari in fhe year 1987 a~r Umariya (M.P.). Thereaffer, vid Annexure P-1 he was promo‘red To The posf of Revenue Inspecfor and fransferr-e a‘r The Office of Sef'rlemenf, Bas'rar and fill now he is working of Basi'ar. On or afion of fhe Stare of C5. ou‘i' of Si'a‘ie of MP. on 7.9.2000 vide Annexure P-2 fhe pe'l'ii'ioner submi‘h‘ed his op'i'ion To be alioca‘red 1‘0 The Sfafe of M.P. Despife fhe 'i'ion given by The peTiTioner‘ and ofTer passing sufficienT Time The peTiTioner did noT receive his allocaTion order or informed -ofherwise, fherefore, fhe pefifion r- made a represenfafion ‘l'o fhe Sfafe of 6.6. (Annexure P—3). ThereafTer, fhe peTiTioner again submiTTed his opTion in The required formaT and consequenTlyrespondenT No.4 vide IeTTer doTed 1.8.2003 forwarded The opTion of peTiTiner along wiTh oTher Revenue InspecTors ‘ (Annexure P-4) buT even Then noTh ng is being heard by The peTiTIoner Learned counsel for The peT Tloner submiTTed ThaT in View of The prowsions “I i of sub-secTion (1) of SecTion 68 o ReorganizaTion iAcT, 2000 every person who immediafe/y before fhe‘appoinfed ay is serviiy in comedian wifh file affairs of i n mfh x o W‘WW @W.Wé$mw m /cr . rhe affairs of Sfafe of MP. unlesl: he is required by general or specia/ order of fhe c'enfra/ 6ovemmenf falserve lorevisv‘ona/Iy in comedian wifh ffve afi’airs of fhe 5fafe.of 6.6. He furfher subn"i1-fed fha? no order of ailacafion af ‘rhe service of fhe pefi?}oner to the Swre of‘ C.6. has been passed, ‘rherefore, as per fhis- provision fhe pefifioner‘ is required to confinue in services of fhe Sfafe of MP. Learned ccunse! for fhe pe‘ti‘rioner“ further submi‘Hediha? fhe pefifioner may ea allowed fo make a deTailed represe fa‘rian +0 fhe Union of Indidthrough the Sfme of Chhaffisgarh raising ’aH his gri vances and Union of India 61 Sfai-e of C.6. be direcfed to decide The represent i-ion in accordance wifh iaw, fo which learned counsel for +he respandenfs have n objecfion. Having heard learned couns l for 1he parfiesdx having regard to the facfs and circumsfances of The case, I m of The opinion fhaf if is Jusi‘ and proper 1'0 allow fhegpefifioner fo make a rep sen‘rai-ion raising all his grievances fo Union of' India Through Siafe of C.G. within a period of one monfh from ’roday and in furn Union of India a Sfafe o‘f C5. 'ro q‘hnsider his represenfafion and decide The same ‘ in accordance with law within anol‘h‘er period of three months from the date of receipT of representation. With the direction aforesaid, The petiTian stands disposed of. Consequently, LA. No.2468/05 stands disposed of. Certified cop’y as per rules. Sdl— L.C. Bhadoo Judge (whoW) XI—HC—22 WW, m, ‘mm mm “a 200 X§ W mm mm mm WWW ’2,/— WW§WW é;atf%nan%$1