IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37976 of 2008 GHANSHYAM CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.1.2009 Heard Sri Vikramdeo Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Supaul who dismissed the prayer for bail of the petitioner in a case under Section 392 IPC in which the petitioner is not named in the FIR, has referred to two paragraphs in his rejection order to show that the two witnesses had seen the petitioner running away by a motorcycle but after being read out the contents of those paragraphs, the court finds that they simply appeared learning about the above fact from other persons. The petitioner is in custody since 7.5.2008 without being put on test identification parade or anything being recovered from him. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Supaul in Kishanpur P.S.Case No.74 of 2007(G.R.No.502 of 2007). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )