IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.515 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 5.7.2011 Shyam Sunder Sehgal ......Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Dalip Kaur ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Abhinav Oberoi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) On 27.1.2011, the following order was passed by this Court:- “After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not have any case on merit. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed. However, he submits that he may be allowed time to vacate the demise premises within six months. On this ground only, notice of motion for 8.2.2011. Dasti only.” The time to vacate the demised premises, as prayed by the counsel for the petitioner, is going to expire on 26.7.2011. At the asking of the Court counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in difficulty and cannot vacate the premises within the time, as prayed. The conduct of the petitioner is highly deplorable. After getting concession from the Court, he cannot be allowed to retract from his submissions. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner shall vacate the premises on or before 5.8.2011 and hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlord. CR No.515 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Keeping in view the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner (to which the petitioner shall be bound), this Court is restraining itself from taking any further action against the petitioner at this stage. Disposed of. It is made clear that in case the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent, as aforesaid, the respondent will be at liberty to move an appropriate application before this Court. July 5, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE