IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5356 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision:06.04.2011 Parbhat Kumar ....Petitioner versus The Haryana State Electricity Board and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. A.M.Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Parbod Mittal, Advocate,for the respondents. --- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) The prayer sought for in the writ petition was already rendered infructuous through the communication which was issued on 24.06.1991. There was a condition imposed that the petitioner was liable to withdraw the writ petition before re-employment was given. Such a condition was definitely not appropriate, but in any event, it is not necessary to examine the same, he having been granted re-employment in terms of the said letter and it is informed that he even gained promotion from the post which he held. The writ petition is disposed as infructuous. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 06.04.2011 sanjeev