IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2011 / 24TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 5240 of 2007(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- RAJEEV. N., S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 28 YEARS, KOCHU VEEDU, KIZHAKKEBHAGOM, PATHANAPURAM (PO), KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHAIRMAN, GOVERNING BODY, N.S.S. POLY-TECHNIC COLLEGE, N.S.S. HEAD OFFICE, CHANGANASSERY-2. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH. R3 BY SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. SRI.P.GOPAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 5240 of 2007(W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS (INDIA) DATED 22/10/2005. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE JOINT CONTROLLER OF TECHNICAL EXAMINATIONS (KERALA) DATED 08/11/1999. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY DATED 17/01/2007. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN GAZETTE OF INDIA, FEBRUARY 11/2006. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION APPEARED IN MATHRUBHOOMI THOZHIL VARTHA PUBLISHED ON 11/11/2006. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 09/06/2004 ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR (EEA) OF THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS (INDIA) TO THE SECRETARIES OF ALL STATE/LOCAL CENTERS. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 19/12/1989 WITH G.O.(P) NO.261/89/ H.EDN. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5240 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner and the counsel are absent. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd