1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6775 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 332 OF 1990 Rangnath s/o Babu Surwase .. Applicant Versus M/s Shrikrishan Sukharam Laddad .. Respondent Shri S. Y. Mahajan, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri Vivek Kulkarn, Advocate h/f Shri A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 10TH JULY, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri S. Y. Mahajan for the applicant. 2. Rule. Shri Vivek Kulkarni advocate for the respondent waives notice for the respondent. The application is taken up for hearing immediately with consent of the parties. This is an application for restoration of second appeal, which was dismissed in default on 2 19.06.2009. It is stated that advocate of the appellant was arguing second appeal before another Court, therefore, he could not attend the court. In view of the reasons given in para 2 of the application, the application deserves to be allowed. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). The applicant to pay cost of Rs. 750/- to the advocate of the respondent. Application is disposed of. [P. R. BORKAR, J.] bsb/July 09