BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16212 of 2011 1 SIVALINGAM 2 DHANASEKARAN 3 PRABU 4 BABU 5 JEYARAJ @ MALAR 6 NALLUSAMY 7 SUBRAMANI 8 BOOMINATHAN 9 RAMESH 10 POTHUM PONNU 11 DEVI 12 KANNAYEE ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 12 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.195/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.S.MP AMALAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC.438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148 and 323 I.P.C. and r/w Section 4 of TNWHP Act, in Crime No.195 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.S.MP.Amalan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that this is a case and case in counter. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners had beaten the defacto complainant's daughter in law with hands and stick and hence, a case has been registered against them. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides and also considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 13/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAVALAVOO POLICE STATION, MELUR, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.S.MP AMALAN, ADVOCATE SR.NO.43554. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16212 of 2011 Date :13/12/2011 2P/6C RPB : 15.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/