IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1152 of 2011 Manoj Gupta and two others. … Petitioners. Versus Civil Judge Senior Division Dehradun and another. … Respondents. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate learned counsel for the petitioners. Date June 15, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 5632 of 2011) The only prayer made in this writ petition is that the respondent no.1-Civil Judge (Senior Division) Dehradun be directed to decide the application (paper no. 6-C2) of the petitioner as well as the application (paper no. 18C2) dated 29-9-2010 moved by the petitioner in Original Suit No. 338 of 2010 Badri Prasad Vs. Manoj and others, which is pending before the respondent no.1. A perusal of the record shows that that the respondent no. 2 Badri Prasad filed Original Suit No. 338 of 2010 against the petitioner-defendants in the court of respondent no.1 for a decree of permanent injunction. Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed application for temporary injunction (paper no. 6-C2). The learned trial court by order dated 13-8-2010 has granted temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff-respondent no. 2 and the defendant-petitioners were restrained from creating third party interest in the suit property. The grievance of the petitioners is that they filed an application on 30-11-2010 for setting aside the ex parte temporary injunction passed against them and to dismiss the application paper no. 6-C2 of the respondent no.2 (Annexure 5 to the petition), but the same has not so far been disposed of. The petitioners have also filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C. for rejection of the plaint on 29-9-2010. According to the petitioners, this application too is still pending. 2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice, the respondent no. 1 is directed to first decide the application for temporary injunction (paper no. 6-C2) on merits after hearing both the parties in accordance with law and thereafter, to decide the application moved under Order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C. on merits after hearing both the parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP