@gg‘ 0%w IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE " FOR CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON m No. ,éimg of2011 mmE %EN$§§ Directorate of industries, m :g-Wr i Petitioners : (1) GanpatiSolvex Private Limited a, company incorporated under the provisions of the Companiee m " Act 1956 through director \(AVMWQQWW 0:”g4kggtgw Kanhaiya Daga Lakholi Road, q$§;é&%‘: Rajnandgaon(C.G.) i Q‘:s@§‘f i r i2) K‘anhaiya Daga S/o Late KN. Daga aged about 39 years Lakhoii Road Rajnandgaon (CG) Versus Wants (1)/ State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Commercial Taxes D.K.S. Mantralaya BhaVan, Raipur ‘ (ca) (2f State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Industries and Commerce Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, I Chhattisgarh (3)/ State Level Committee, @@ Floor, Llc Building, Pandri Raipur. (4) Commissioner of Commercial 'Tax, Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, Civil Line‘s, Raipur. / (5) Assistant Commissioner 'Commerciai Tax Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Before: Hon'bie The Chief Justice and his companion Judges of the Hon'ble Hiqh Court of Judicature Chhattisggrh at Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION OR ORDER AS THE FACTS OF THE CASE WARRANT 1 DAPT‘IFITI AD npirmyn mem n. ‘- C! IT P ( o. 9 of 21 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONST] l U l ION Oi. 1$VTDJn SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additioim Advoeate General for the State. Present: nw;v::aw:¢.¢w x-‘mm.hwm“.V A V ORDER (Passedon 23‘? aay ofNovember, 2011 Learned counsel ayyearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, being aggrieved by the order' dated 26.07.201‘lv i (Annexure P/5) passed by the District Commerce & Industries Centre, Rajnandgaon, Whetein the exemption granted to the ‘ petitioner earlier was cancelled preferred an appeal before the e State Level Committee (Annexure P/6) alongwnh an annhcation ‘ for grant of stay of recoverv However, no decision has been taken ; on the said application till date though, law 1n this. respect has already been settled by this Court in a catena of decisions. Shri Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State submits that ifthe application for stay, as aforestated, is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law as early as possible preferably Within a period of two weeks on its own merits and perspective Shri Bhaduri further submits that before a decrsron 1s taken on the stav application, no coercrve steps shall be taken against the.” petitioner In View of the above submissmn, according to learned counsel for .. the petitioner nothing survrves in this petition tor adiudication at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy. today. 1 ‘ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge HIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARIi AT BILASPUR WR E‘i‘l’l'IUN T) N 689 01 : ‘ PETITIONERS : Ganyati Solvex Private Limited & Anoiher. VERSUS RE§PONDFNT§ Qtate ofChhanhgarh & Othars