U A-45 % 19.08.2011 Present: Mr.Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. +CM(M) No.958/2011 & CM Nos.15418-19/2011 * Order impugned before this Court is the order dated 12.05.2011 vide which the application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code of the Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') for reopening his evidence had been dismissed. Present suit is a suit for recovery of money; issues had been framed on 06.01.2004. The plaintiff did not file any list of witnesses. In the first instance, affidavit of one Udaiveer Singh had been filed on behalf of the plaintiff; thereafter an application filed by the plaintiff seeing substitution of Sanjay Jam in place of Udaiveer Singh had been allowed; thereafter a second application seeking substitution of name of Ravinder Singh in place of Sanjay Jam had also been allowed; Ravinder Singh was finally examined, cross-examined and discharged on 13.09.2010 on which date the evidence of the plaintiff stood closed. No appeal or review against the order dated 13.09.2010 has admittedly been filed; order has attained a finality. The defendant had also filed his affidavit by way of evidence; present application has been filed thereafter i.e. on 15.11.2010. The impugned order has correctly noted that no Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified ( cogent explanation has been furnished by the plaintiff seeking the aforenoted prayer. More than 6- ½ years had been granted to the plaintiff to adduce his evidence i.e.from the date of framing of issues and the evidence of the plaintiff finally stood closed; that order had also attained a finality. The impugned order dismissing the application of the plaintiff under Secticn 151 of the Code suffers from no infirmity; it warrants no interfrence. Dismissed. INDERMEET KAUR, J. AUGUST 19, 2011 a I