IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14920 of 2011 Date of Decision.16.08.2011 Bharat Bhushan s/o Sh. Dalla Ram r/o backside of Power House, Mohalla Sargapur, Kot kapura, District Faridkot .....Petitioner Versus LIC Housing Finance Ltd., through tis Authorised Authority Area Office, Seiya Complex, 1st Floor, Model Town, Jalandhar, District Jalandhar and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks for interference at the stage when action is taken by the respondent for recoveries by enforcement of security under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner says that only property which he owns is now sought to be attached and recovery is taken and he wants appropriate accommodation from the respondent where the petitioner will be able to pay the amount over a period of time. It shall not be possible for this Court to monitor the repayment schedule for the benefit of the petitioner. It shall be open to the petitioner to seek appropriate redress in an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act or by appropriate representation, which he would make to the respondent, and if the respondent so deems, could defer the action for sale of the property. I find no interference possible in the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 16, 2011 Pankaj*