IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20068 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.SELVARAJ, S/O. LATE THANKAPPAN NADAR, A.V.MATHA FAST FOOD, PULIYAMCODE CHEMPAZHANTHY.P.O. TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.S.D.ASOKAN SR.R.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE TRIVANDRUM (RURAL), TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTRO OF POLICE KAZHAKOOTAM POLICE STATION,KAZHAKKOOTTAM, TRIVANDRUM. 3. SALIM, S/O. PERIKANNU SAHIB, THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, JANDOORKONAM, CHEMPAZHANTHY.P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 4. SHEEBA KUMARI D/O. BENCI, MATHALAYAM, JANDORKONAM, CHEMPAZHANTHI.P.O., TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN FOR R4 SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH FOR R4 SRI.SAIJO HASSAN FOR R4 SRI.A.S.SABU FOR R4 SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. FOR R4 SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI FOR R4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 20068 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested that interim order dated 16/7/2009 passed by this court giving personal protection to the petitioner be confirmed. 2. Strong objection is taken to the above request by Sri.Saijo Hassan, learned counsel for the party respondents. The learned counsel drew our attention to the counter affidavit filed by the party respondents and submitted that the petitioner is accused in several crimes. He also submitted that matrimonial dispute is pending between the petitioner and the party respondent and if any order is passed in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner is likely to take advantage of the directions issued by this court. The learned counsel also submitted that the party respondents have no intention to cause any danger to the life of the petitioner. 3. Having regard to the stand taken by the party WPC.No.20068/2009 2 respondents, we feel that it will suffice if we record the submissions addressed on behalf of the party respondents that they have no intention to cause any damage to the life of the petitioner and that there will not be any threat, violence or contumacious conduct from their part towards the petitioner. We record the above submissions and dispose of this writ petition accordingly. It is also made clear that this judgment will not cause any prejudice to either party in the on going proceedings under the matrimonial jurisdiction. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk