IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Time Extension Application No. 4174 of 2010 IN Writ Petition (M/S) No.814 of 2009 Man Mohan Sahni S/O Sri Ram Kishan R/O 76A, Nahar Wali Gali, Near Arya Samaj Mandir, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. … Applicant-Petitioner. Versus 1. Sri Balesh Kumar Jain, S/O Sri Prem Chandra Jain, R/O 86, Nahr Wali Gali, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. 2. Prem Chandra Jain, S/O Late Sri Mathura Dass Jain, R/O 93, Moti Bazar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. … O.P.-Respondents. Mr. I.P.Kohli, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Date June 18, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner and perused the record. Affidavit of service filed by the applicant goes to show that the respondents refused to accept Dasti notice. By means of this time extension application, the petitioner has sought extension of six months’ more time to vacate the premises in question. A perusal of the record shows that the Writ Petition (M/S) No. 814 of 2009, Man Mohan Sahni Vs. Sri Balesh Kumar Jain and another was dismissed on merits vide order dated 9-6-2009 passed by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, sought two years’ time to be granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises. This Court after considering the facts and circumstances of the case has granted one year’s time to the petitioner to vacate the disputed premises and to deliver its peaceful possession to the landlord-respondent no.1. 2 I have perused the affidavit filed by the applicant in support of application for grant of further time to vacate the premises. Sufficient time has already been given to the petitioner while dismissing the writ petition by order dated 9-6-2009. No good ground is made out to grant further time to the applicant- petitioner to vacate the premises in question. The time extension application (No. 4174 of 2010) moved by the applicant-petitioner is devoid of any force. The same is accordingly rejected. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP