IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31776 of 2008 MAYANAND SAH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the State: Mr. Nityanand Tiwary,A.P.P. 3 14.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This case is registered under section s 304 –B and 120 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is father-in-law whereas petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law of the deceased. It is submitted that after investigation police did not find the case true against the petitioners rather he found the case true only against the husband of the deceased, therefore, charge sheet was submitted against him and final form exonerating the petitioners has been submitted by the police. The court below has taken cognizance against all the accused persons. Learned counsel further submits that anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected by a Bench of this Court on 5.8.2004 and they were directed to surrender and move for regular bail. Learned counsel for the State submits that though the petitioners were directed to surrender before the court below in Cri. Misc. No. 5611 of 2004 which has been annexed as annexure-2 but the petitioners have surrendered after lapse of about ¾ years and therefore, they do not deserve bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to - 2 - grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected for the present. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after six months from the date of passing of this order. Rahman/ (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)