THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY C.R.P.No.4627 of 2010 ORDER: The present civil revision petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the orders dated 28.07.2010 in Tr.O.P.No.279 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Khammam. The grievance of the petitioner is that when the O.P. was filed with a request to transfer the suit in O.S.No.113 of 2009 pending on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam to that of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, for the reason that connected suit in O.S.No.536 of 2002 is pending before the II Additional Junior Civil Judge Court, Khammam. The learned District Judge while disposing of the Transfer O.P.279 of 2010, ordered for transfer of O.S.No.536 of 2002 from the court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, to the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, to be tried along with O.S.No.113 of 2009, pending on its file. Aggrieved by the same, the present C.R.P. is filed. Heard. The impugned order does not speak of any reasons for transferring O.S.No.536 of 2002 from II Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court to Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Khammam, when the transfer petition is filed seeking transfer of O.S.No.113 of 2009 from the court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam to the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam. This Court after verification of the pendency of above said two Courts, found that the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam is having the pendency of 773 cases, whereas the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam is having 990 cases, out of which, only 211 cases are civil cases. The District Judge, Khammam, might have transferred the case as stated above, in view of the fact that the pendency of the Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Khammam is less than the pendency of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Khammam. Under the above circumstances, the learned District Judge, Khammam, has rightly transferred the suit and this Court is unable to see any grounds to interfere with the impugned order and the present petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the C.R.P. is dismissed. No costs. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 22nd October 2010, Rns