1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2101 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5754 OF 2004 Central Bank of India .. Applicant Versus Sudhir V. Shetty .. Respondent Mr.Hiralal Thakkar, Senior Counsel i/b. R.L.Shethia for Applicant None for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J DATE : 22nd August 2005. P.C. . Mr.Thakkar, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of this application states that copy of C.A. is duly served on respondent and the name of respondent’s Advocate appears on Board. He states that respondent’s Advocate is aware that the matter is placed today before this court. 2 2. With the assistance of Mr.Thakkar perused C.A. and annexures thereto. Mr.Thakkar points out that although an agreement was entered into for acquiring alternate premises, concerned party backed out and now the applicant bank will have to close down its Chembur branch if time to vacate is not extended as a last chance. He states that although earlier C.A. has been taken out the same was disposed by imposing terms and the same have been complied with and the applicant is bound and liable to comply with the terms imposed in this C.A. also. 3. In the light of the averments in the C.A. time to vacate stands extended as a last chance till 31st December 2005. No further extension would be granted. This extension is on the same terms and conditions imposed while disposing of the earlier C.A. Present C.A. is disposed of accordingly. 3 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)