IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43676 of 2011 Mango Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 20.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in Complaint Case No. 88C of 2010 registered u/s 323, 342, 366, 120B IPC and 9 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention)Act. According to the complaint petition, it has been alleged that on 16th September 2009 accused persons took the complainant on the pretext of Durga Pooja. Co- accused Lalita Devi, who is own Mausi of the complainant and her Gotani Mango Devi (Petitioner) took her to Delhi and reached at the residence of Kanhaiya Paswan, who has been working in private company. She compelled her to do illegal work. It has been alleged that Lalita Devi had coerced her to depose in a case filed by her husband and father in-law. Accordingly, she came to Begusarai and after recording her statement again returned to Delhi. It has been alleged that co-accused Kanhaiya Paswan started living there and Lalita Devi disappeared from there. Thereafter Kanhaiya forcibly established illegal relationship who used to assault her also stating that her 2 Mausi had sold her for Rs.25,000/- It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier also similar type of case was filed against the petitioner in which the complainant was examined u/s 164 Cr.P.C. where she raised allegation of torture against the husband. It has further been submitted that subsequently the complainant had filed a case against her husband and retracted from her initial version and has filed a petition before the learned court below to that effect. In a similar facts and circumstances, Lalita Devi and 3 others have been granted anticipatory in Cr.Misc.No.12195 of 2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within 4 weeks from to-day, petitioner Mango Devi is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Gaurav Anand, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai in Complaint Case No.88C of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C. and on her undertaking that she will co- operate with the investigation and trial. Jay/ (Shivaji Pandey, J)