IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41840 of 2010 1. NIBASH SHARMA 2. PYAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 26/03/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The submission on behalf of the petitioners/brothers-in-law of the deceased under Sections-302 and 201/34 of Indian Penal Code is of false implication. Considering the nature of allegations when the body of the deceased was found embedded in the sand by the river side, dogs tearing at the same, the decapitated condition of the body, the Court does not consider the present a fit case for privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. That the father-in-law and the mother-in-law of the deceased may have been granted regular bail by this Court are matters to be more appropriately considered in a regular bail application, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)