1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.262 OF 2005 Raosaheb Pandurang Mane. ...Petitioner. Vs. Tahasildar, Taluka Shirol & Ors. ...Respondents. .... None for the Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 30, 2006. P.C. None present for the Petitioner. It appears that the grievance of the Petitioner is that he could not extract sand in view of the resistance by the villagers and, therefore, the relief as prayed for. The further relief was to direct the Respondents not to invite tenders for the year 2004-05. The petition was filed on 18th January 2005. We are in January 2006. Considering that no case made out for interference. At the highest if the Petitioner could not extract sand, it will be open to him to make a representation to the Respondents for recovery of the amount paid by him proportionately and it is for the Respondents to pass the appropriate orders considering the terms of lease. 2 With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)