IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 26TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5526 of 2008(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M/S. IDEA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD., SECOND FLOOR, MERCY ESTATE, RAVIPURAM, COCHIN-682015,REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, SRI. RAMACHANDRAN.C BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, OTTUR VILLAGE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, PETTAH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695024. 4. OTTUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, OTTUR, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. SRI. K.RAMACHANDRAN, PRESIDENT, KRISHNAGIRI SREE ARDHANAREESWARA TEMPLE, VADASSERIKONAM, OTTUR, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & 2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 5526 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 15, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Exts.P3, P4 and P6. Exts.P4 and P6 are two prohibitory orders issued by the 2nd respondent requiring the recipient thereof to stop further work in connection with the Cellular Mobile Telecommunication Tower. 2. It would appear that Exts.P4 and P6 are issued mainly relying on Ext.P3 communication from the 1st respondent, which was issued based on a complaint made by the 5th respondent. In Ext.P4 reference is also made about the stay order issued by the Pollution Control Board. In any case it is evident that Exts.P4 and P6 were instigated by Ext.P3 order of the 1st respondent and therefore it is for the 1st respondent to finalise the proceedings that led to Exts.P4 and P6. 3. In view of this, I direct that the 1st respondent shall issue WP(C) 5526/08 Page numbers notice to the petitioner and the 5th respondent and finalise the proceedings which resulted in Exts.P4 and P6. 4. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-