IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2303 of 2011(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.SHINIL, PUTHENPURAKKAL HOUSE, AYYAMPILLY, KUZHUPPILLY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.MATHEW SUNNY SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NJARAKKAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682505. 2. SREERAJ, KIZHAKKE KANICHILEZHATHU VEEDU, EAST OF DISPENSARY, CHERAI P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN 683 514. 3. THOMAS, MANADAN VEEDU, NEAR DISPENSARY, CHERAI P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN 683514. 4. THOMAS, MOONJELI VEEDU, NEAR DISPENSARY, CHERAI P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN 683514. * ADDL. R5 IS SUOMOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 24.01.2011 IN WP(C) 2303/11 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KOCHI GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. CHARISHMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 2303 of 2011(K) APPENDIX -------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ---------------------------------- P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KOCHI DT.11.12.2010 P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DT.18.12.2010 P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DT.1.1.11 P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DT.13.1.11 P5:- TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE LICENSE NO.120/09-10 ISSUED DURING THE YEAR 2009-10 BY THE EXCISE DEPARTMENT DT.20.2.09 P6:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT.19.1.11 //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. rkc R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.2303 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st January, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. When this petition came up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may now be dismissed as unnecessary. We accept the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as unnecessary. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/ R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.2303 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th January, 2011 ORDER Basant, J. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the course of discussions at the Bar, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the Circle Inspector of Excise, Kochi may be arrayed as an additional respondent in this petition for a proper resolution of the disputes. Accordingly, accepting the said request, we array the Circle Inspector of Excise, Kochi as the additional fifth respondent. 2. Heard. Admitted. The learned Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 and 5. Issue notice to respondents 2 to 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays and is accordingly permitted to take out notice to respondents 2 to 4 by special messenger. Verify service and call on 31.1.2011. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/