IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6042 of 2009 1. BIBI TASLIMA, wife of Nazir Hussain 2. Jarjish Hussain, son of late Qayamatullah 3. Md. Harun, son of Azimuddin, all are resident of village Katakosh, Babupur Tola, P.S. Manihari, District Katihar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 20.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 364 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. They are named in the complaint along with Nazir Hussain, who is said to be the father of the main accused, Manirul Haque, Accused No.1. Petitioner no.1 is the wife of Nazir Hussain, petitioner no.2 is the father of petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.3 is the cousin grandfather of Accused No.1, Monirul Haque. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that co- accused, Nazir Hussain has been allowed bail in the event of arrest by another Bench of this Court. Let the court below confirm the aforesaid fact and if it is found true that Nazir Hussain has been allowed bail in the event of arrest by another Bench of this Court then on their surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, the petitioners above named be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction 2 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 226 of 2008, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. In the event submission noted above that Accused No.2, Nazir Hussain has been allowed bail in the event of arrest by another Bench of this Court is found incorrect, then this order need not be given effect to. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)