IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 15th day of November, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1230 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Sukhvinder Singh son of Sri Kahsmira Singh, r/o village Nimbabad, P.S. Sakido, District Jind Haryana and (2) Ajmer Singh son of Sri Chandra Bhan, r/o village Pali, P.S. Narnand, District Hisar, Haryana …………………..Applicant(s) Versus State of Uttaranchal. ……………….. Opposite Party _________________________________________________________________________ Arising out of- Case crime no. 661 of 2002, Under sections 3(I), of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Lansdowne, District Pauri Garhwal _________________________________________________________________________ By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants-accused and the Assistant Government Advocate. There is only one criminal case pending against the applicants-accused, in which they are on bail. There is no previous conviction to the credit of the applicants and considering this fact, there are reasonable grounds to accept at this stage the argument that the applicants have not committed the offence and there is no likelihood of their involving themselves in similar activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicants (1) Sukhvinder Singh son of Sri Kahsmira Singh, r/o village Nimbabad, P.S. Sakido, District Jind Haryana and (2) Ajmer Singh son of Sri Chandra Bhan, r/o village Pali, P.S. Narnand, District Hisar, Haryana be released on bail in case crime no. 661 of 2002, under sections 3(I), of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Lansdowne, District Pauri Garhwal on their each filing a personal bond and adequate sureties to the satisfaction of Special Judge, 15.11.2002./B. (Irshad Hussain, J.)