^ H SSLE EEHSR ^L^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P (S) No ^^ /2010 PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS S.C. Tiwari, S/o M.P. Tiwari, aged about 50 years, Sub-Engineer, R.E.S. . Department Working in Jehpad Panchayat, Sarangarh, R/o Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ^ :1 The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : 1 the Secretary, Panchayat and ' Rural Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. Under Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^3. Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Raigarh Divisjon, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ^ 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERART!CL^226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. L. OH COURI OF CHHATnSOARH A:r BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) N©.6868 Qf*2010 ^ PETmONER RESPONDENTS S.OTiw^i. VERSUS 'rbe State ofCUhattis^rh & Ofheis. Wmi PEmK)N UNDER AmiCLE 226 OF THE CONSimjHC^ OP BMDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri SatishX. Agnihotri, J. "^ Present: 8hri Slhri A.K.Prasad, Advoc^te fbr th^ petilioner. Shri Shashaiik Th^kur, Paael Lawyer forth©State. Shri Parikaj Shrivastava. Advocate far the respondent No. 4. ; OgU.liJg^fOHLAL) (Passed on 27ut day ofJyae, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg fbr tta^ State/respOBd^ite ^ubmits ^hat the pedtioner has already continued at the origaial {Aace ofposting fbr more than six monttas <ai account af itrterim order granted by tfais Court 03.12.2010. 'I'he State/respondeats may be granted Mberty to pass appropriate ordem keeping in view publie irterest aaid admmistt-ative exigenqy. Shri rhakiir tetfaersuhmits Aat tiie State/respondents shall not msfet upon compliance oftiie myugped order dated and 12.11.2Q1Q (Ami^iure P/l) »resspeet of the petitioner. 2. At this stage^ when BO effect could be given to the impugnie^l ordeF dteted 12.11.2010 (Anxiexum P/l) oa acc^uirt cf^ toterim or^ dated 10.12.2010, tifcius, it is not necosssayto go iato legality aiid validity oflhe atbrestated impugned wders. 3, In view of the above. according to l^amed <x>umel appeariag for Ae petitioner, notiiing survives mtius pelitionibr ad|udlcatioti. 4. AcGordingly, tfie petitian stan<te dispcxsed ot'. No order asto costs. Anut Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge