Crl.Misc.M No.1677 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. M-No.1677 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 8, 2011 Tejvir Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM; HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Gaurav Dhir, D.A.G.,Haryana. Mr.Sandeep, Advocate, for the complainant (Respondent No.4). Alok Singh, J. Mr.Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of A.S.I., Brijender Singh, states that since Tejvir Singh and Rekha Rani, both have married and on the date of marriage Rekha Rani was 2 months short of 18 years and now she is residing with petitioner No.1 happily as per the statements given to the police, therefore, police shall file cancellation report before the competent Court. Mr.Sandeep, learned counsel for the complainant, Crl.Misc.M No.1677 of 2011 2 states that since Rekha Rani has settled happily with petitioner No.1, therefore, he shall be having no objection in filing the cancellation report in the case. He further states that on the last date, complainant had the occasion to meet Rekha Rani and she had refused to go with the complainant and was adamant and still adamant to live with petitioner No.1, therefore, if cancellation report is filed, he has nothing to add. In the light of the statements made by the learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. (Alok Singh) November 8, 2011 Judge BB