IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** R.F.A. No.806 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.08.2007 Ashok Verma and others .....Appellants Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. C.B.Goel, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Jindal, AAG, Haryana. **** C.M. No.2013-CI of 2007 After hearing learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, which is supported by an affidavit of counsel for the appellants, the delay of 637 days in filing the appeal is condoned. R.F.A. No.806 of 2007 It is not disputed by learned counsel for the parties that in R.F.A. No.5100 of 2001 – Satbir Singh v. State of Haryana and others, this Court had considered the appeals arising out of same acquisition and had enhanced the compensation to Rs.500/- per square yard in addition to other statutory benefits available in law. Accordingly, the present appeal is also disposed of in the same terms. August 24, 2007 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE