^Vftt?^>WM-rt7^ft"**^"'t^'^ 'SMSgK^WISan. ^ ^.B: fSeEvice Matter) IN3IiEHON®I,@MOH;i@©l?R^0FieHHA'TTISGAKH ftT B@,ft^>ysfC MTTlSGASHl WRI'I'a'ETI'FIQSfSlNO.w^i SinBlB Bench /3010. PETITIONER: li^* :ai9Sr^ BI:S s:; ffi^i til:t° Ifflti: iiilliifl J»1viii? m Blrttnesh1a^ Et^ad Patel, son of^ Raindeen^ Pl.tet, ,age^t abiaut45 years, ^rkingas|Peon©<3'yt.Hi^ier ^gCcniSary^ScliooI^liendTa., I (8aTeHilkela)^'I^hSiI Baramteela, \," Distnct Raigarii, CUhattisgartt. w\s INSiK^r.' • WSSSKSSWSsS'^^^ VS^SSSSISSSiK^ 3J'ilB:;S1888'8iSHi®!siBoMeiit:s!,i|;:':,;«?;. :l"SKIBBfiKSS:KSIIilBK^I$laK®§:.^ verstis t. ®tateof'Gi-iIiattisgailh, Tfaroi.^1 Secretary, Bepal-tiiiCTit of Sc^iool ^: :3'. •Eflueation^Baiia'ISalyan ;giti^i^^; Bfaawan,^Raipur, iESilaatfisgaiBfii;. 2. - Di8tricfEducatiOnOfEcer,Djisfric:t ^l?:;"eSo51Ss1x^;;Ra3i^u$i,'l@istTK:fiI®u^iB, •vaiED&@aS'E6ffifflMaB>l^a^B®EEi;g2BS i'HaE HBWUMSBi ^i; a i.i; 'Tt^ m i' ^» i:> •; >. T XI-HC—78 S,-^ "41<<1^<1, ®Tt1y'16,'fs|<-|iy^< ...U.'£:...fel;J^?;....6.S32jtf sn^?i'Tra^ ('yf^'i^'q) sn^i ^r K.-h'b Wt-sn^isB^w ^mwafOTsn^i »'n?vt ftffo -?i >* AA«, Shri Har'ish Khuntiya, counsej Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the St^te. •'•^•: Counsei for the petitioner sul of law involved in the present 3510/2008 (Mongra Bai Manant Othersl and further in W.P.(S) No,3; State of C.G. 85 Othersj which havf^ therefore this petition may be disr^ submits that he is wiiline to withcl: make fresh representation before submits that the respondent N0.3 representation as expeditiously as p<j Counsel for the State submit4 position to ascertain as to whethi identical to that of W.P.(S; Nos.[ however submits that let the representation giving the full facts cj: orders passed in the above two decis tum after examining the same, thej appropriate order. .Acoordingly, the petitioner petition with liberty to make fresh detailing his claim and in the et representation, the authority concej the light of the above two decision^ appropriate order as expeditiousfy a^ pejt *i<)[<-i4l-< •iwrcff •? fezt tFot^K ^aTfin-sn^r i'or the petitioner. I^mits that the facts and question cfcse are simiiar to W.P.fS) No. 3s Another Vs. State of C.G. 8s 366/09 (Makar Dwai Pradhan Vs. been passed by this Court and josed of in the same terms. He jraw this petition with liberty to respondent N0.2. He however may be directed to decide the lissiDle that at this stage, he is not in a sr the case of the petitioner is [3510/2008 &.3266/2009. He i^titioner make a fresh detailed |f his case along with the copy of |ions passed by this Court and in lcompetent authoritj.' wouid pass is permitted to withdraw this representation before resp. N0.2 <-entua!ity of making any such •ned would examine the same in passed by this Court and pass possible. ~-—~— ^ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge