1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3281 of 2009 Sambhu and ors v. State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.P. Joshi, Adv for applicant Ms R. Wasnik, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 14th Oct 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned APP for State. Learned APP submits that perusal of statements of Rushibha, Pallavi and Shamal would reveal that applicants were present at the house of deceased; they had dinner and were watching television. Learned counsel for applicants submits that girls went to sleep after having dinner and they were told about the alleged incident after they woke up. It is submitted that dead body of deceased was found in the field of one Tanabai Kuttarmare in village Maldongri and there is no material indicating involvement of applicants. 2. Considering the fact that there is no direct incriminating material against the applicants and that only on the basis of last-seen- together theory, applicants are sought to be implicated, I feel, prima facie case is made out for grant of bail to applicants. 2 3. Applicants be released on bail in Crime No. 58/09 registered with Police Station, Brahmapuri under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, upon furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- each with two or more solvent sureties in the like amount. Applicants shall attend trial regularly and shall not try to tamper with prosecution evidence in any manner. Applicants shall not commit any crime while on bail. Applicants shall leave their permanent address with telephone/cell phone number, if any, with the trial Court and shall communicate change therein, if any, in future. Application stands disposed of. Hamdast granted. Judge. hsj