IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.8620 of 1989 Date of Decision:01.04.2010 Mrs. V.L. Kumar, Senior Draftsman, Housing Board Haryana, SCO No.126-27, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh. Versus The State of Haryana through Commissioner & Secretary to Govt. Haryana, Housing Board Deptt., Civil Secretariat, Haryana, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. None for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The case is of the year 1989 and the matter relates to a challenge against reversion order dated 29.06.1989 from the post of Planning Assistant to a lower post of Senior Draftsman. It appears that the order has been stayed at the time when notice was issued on 11.07.1989 and no further modification of order had been made. That probably explains why the petitioner has not been present through counsel in the last several hearings on 17.11.2008 , 08.12.2008 and when the case is called today for hearing. 2. There is no representation for learned counsel for respondents also. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and default of appearance. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE April 01, 2010 Pankaj*