1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Writ Petition (MD)No.5274 of 2011 Pandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakkottai, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.C2/37038/2010, dated 31.12.2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to rehear the matter afresh. For Petitioner : Mr.Arun Prasad For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramanian, 1 & 2 Additional Government Pleader. O R D E R The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the rejection of the appeal by the authorities. The authority has rightly rejected the appeal on the ground that the impugned order itself was not produced before the authority for consideration. Therefore, the order is valid. But now, at this point of time, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he has to trace the original order which was misplaced by him and he seeks only to file a fresh appeal on the basis of the order copy along with the condonation of delay, if any. It is always open for the petitioner to approach the authority with condonation of delay on production of the documents. 2.With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. sms Sd/- Deputy Registrar[Accounts] /True copy/ To Assistant Registrar 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai,Sivagangai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakkottai, Sivagangai District. +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.16261. Writ Petition (MD)No.5274 of 2011 1P/4C Dated:29/04/2011 RPB 02.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/