1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Second Appeal No.484/2006 [Shabbir Ali s/o Asgar Ali .vrs. Smt. Parvin d/o Abdul Samad Qureshi and another] ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... Coram : B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. Dated : 9 th February, 2009. The contention of Advocate Deshpande is that the evidence of the present appellant that he purchased the field on 11.12.1986 and 20.3.1987 in the name of his wife after selling another field for Rs.35,000/- has not been properly appreciated. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties, I have perused both the judgments. The courts below have found that the marriage of his sister was performed two days after his marriage and the field at Hansapur was sold at Rs.35,000/- for that purpose. It is also noticed that the marriage of other sisters of the plaintiff had 2 taken place after these marriages. In view of these marriages in the family, the courts below have found that the story that amount from Rs.35,000/- was available for effecting purchase was not trustworthy. Both the courts have considered the evidence and have recorded the correct findings. The conclusions cannot be said to be perverse. No substantial question of law arises in the second appeal. The appeal is dismissed. JUDGE Gulande