IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.626 of 2006 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Versus RABINDRA LAL JAISWAL ----------- 3. 20.10.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not interfere with the impugned order, inasmuch as what has been done by the court below is that on two applications in terms of reference for the purpose of inspection and the report of the Pleader Commissioner has been fixed. The grievance of the petitioner that certain very crucial important issue as being prayed by the plaintiff petitioner was not referred does not appeal to this Court. It was always open for a party whether the plaintiff or the defendant to get his own defence of any point that he would require to prove his case. That being so, if any of the issues that were sought to be pressed for being included in terms of reference and inspection followed by the report of the Pleader Commissioner has not been included, it would always open for the petitioner or the defendant to adduce his defence to that effect. 2 It goes without saying that any report submitted by the Pleader Commissioner in the terms of reference in the impugned order will definitely be subject to the objection that may be filed by the petitioner. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/