IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.20119 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 10, 2010 RAJWANT KAUR & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. GS Goraya, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. NS Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.6 & 7. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The petitioners and respondent No.6-Sh. Baldev Singh are present in court. Ms.Rajwant Kaur, as identified by her counsel Shri G.S. Goraya, Advocate, states that she got married to Narvair Singh, and would like to stay in her matrimonial home with Narvair Singh. She further states that no force was used to kidnap her. She was not abducted and had gone with Narvair Singh out of her own free will and accord. Sh. Baldev Singh, respondent No.6, as identified by his counsel Shri N.S. Bhardwaj, Advocate, has assured the Court that he shall Criminal Misc. No.20119 -M of 2009 2 not take the law in his own hands and shall not cause any harm to the petitioners, on account of their marriage against the wishes of respondents No.6 and 7. In view of the proceedings carried in court, as noticed above, this petition is disposed of. The petitioners, however, will be at liberty to approach the concerned Station House Officer, in case they feel threatened. In such circumstances, the Station House Officer shall ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners by way of respondents No.6 and 7 taking law in their own hands. Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 states that FIR No. 72 dated 19.7.2009, under Sections 363/366-A, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Ghagga, District Patiala, has been registered. In view of proceedings in Court, learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4, on instructions from ASI Kehar Singh, states that Narvair Singh would not be taken in custody. Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Reader of the Court. February 10, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?