: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.82 OF 2009 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.421 OF 2009 Mrs. Madhuri Vallabhdas Jethabhai & Anr. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Mrs. Brinda Jesal Thakker nee Brinda R. Kapadia .. Defendants ......... Mr. K.P. Madhusoodanan Nair for the plaintiffs Mr. Nitin Thakker, Senior Counsel a/w. Adv. Paresh Shah with Nilesh Gala i/by Shah & Sangahvi for the defendant no.1 Defendant nos.2 to 4 in person. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 8TH APRIL, 2010. P.C. : 1. Plaintiff nos.1 and 2 are present in person. The defendants are also present. The consent terms dated today i.e. 8th April, 2010 are tendered in the Court. They are shown to plaintiffs and all the defendants. They admit their respective signatures and correctness of the consent terms. Learned advocates appearing on both sides state that appropriate order be : 2 : passed on the consent terms. Defendant nos. 2,3 and 4 are in person. They have no objection for passing a decree in terms of consent terms. 2. Consent terms as above are taken on record. They are marked as “X” for identification. There shall be a decree in terms of consent terms with no order as to costs. Refund of Court fees is granted as per Rules. In view of the above, Testamentary Petition No.42 of 2009 stands disposed of. Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court Bombay to issue probate in accordance with the Rules. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]