1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 5498 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S.B.DESHMUKH & A.M.THIPSAY, JJ. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5498 OF 2011 In APEAL [ST] No. 662/2011 KAILAS MARUTI GUNJAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH ... Advocate for Petitioners : Vaishnav Megha B. Mr. D. V. Tele, APP for Respondents: *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith, heard finally by consent of the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the delay of about 13 days has been caused in filing criminal appeal against conviction. Learned A.P.P. states that the justifiable reason is not assigned. 4. We are inclined to condone the delay for the reasons stated in paragraph Nos.2 and 3 of the application. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 5498 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders. appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. CORAM: S.B.DESHMUKH & A.M.THIPSAY, JJ. 5. Criminal application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B) and disposed of. [A.M.THIPSAY, J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:19/12/2011. ans/5498