IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2012 of 2008 (M/S) Raj Kumar and others .......... Petitioner. Versus Director, I.I.T., Roorkee and another ............ Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vipin Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for respondent no.2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the impugned judgments, I find and both the Courts below held against the petitioners. I.I.T. Roorkee had regulated the entry upon the road in question keeping in view the security consideration. Even otherwise, the petitioners have not been able to make out a prima facie case in their favour. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 19.11.2008 A