IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) W.P.No.‘ 1557‘) /2004 / PETITIONER Panchram Sahu, son of Shri Baishakhu, aged about 60 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Gidhawa, Tah. Nawagarh, Distt. Durg, resident of Gidhwa, Post Offlce — Nagoadha, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) § VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhéttisgarh, through : Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) e “Kb Q ‘QW (j‘ M’r'“ Q. .--‘ I C‘Q‘@4" 2. Director (Panchayat), Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur. (CG) 3. The Collector, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) / 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3§ , 5. Dharmendra Koshale, Panchayat Karmi (Secretary / Sachiv) Gram Panchayat Gidhawa, Tah. Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8r, 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI—HC-22 W @ MW, m, mm WaP‘NO‘ (550 200 mm 20.09.2006 Shri Rajneesh Baghel, COW Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt O$Cc has raised some aflidavit flled as a document i: has been 016d for removmg the Counsel for the petitionc] mad as a part of record. LA. No. 784S/2004 sta removed. Page No. 14, which is in this case. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petitioner was the Saipanch of petitioner submits that earlier the was contesting against the sec respondent N05. He further su. more Sarpanch of Gram Panch interested in prosecuting this 1 prays for Withdrawal of this peti The prayer is allowed. The present petition filed Ansel for the petitioner. Advocate for the State. default that page No. 14, copy of ; not complete. LA. No.7848/2004 iefault. ' says ’that page No. 14 may not be nds allowed. The default stands a copy of aiiidavit, will. not be read Gram Panchayat Gidhawa and. he tai'y namely Dhannendra Koshale, mits that since the petitioner is no yat, therefore, he is not personally tition against respondent No.5. He 011. by the petitioner in his personal capacity, is dismissed as Withdr Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge W11. Sd/- a1 (111% tint) x ,