IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-29534 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.11.2011 Deepak ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Manmohan Sikka, DAG, Punjab. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 18, dated 20.01.2010, registered under Sections 302, 307, 506, 148/149 IPC and 25 & 27 of Arms Act. On 03.10.2011, the following contention was noticed:- "Learned Senior counsel has argued that the allegation against the petitioner is of having a fire arm which was, however, not used. Two of the co-accused have already been granted bail and the only distinction with their case is that they were not armed and the petitioner has now been in custody since 01.02.2011. Further the trial is not likely to conclude in the near future." Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions of Head Constable Jasmeet Singh, has accepted the factual assertion. In these circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of athe trial Court. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 04, 2011. JUDGE mamta