IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2010 / 14TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30688 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RUKKIATH BEEVI, ALUPURATHU VADAKKATHIL, KALLALIBHAGOM P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY-690546. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THODIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THODIYOOR, KOLLAM-690537. 2. K.BIJU, MAMBAZHATHU EDAPPURA, KALLALIBHAGOM P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM-690546. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30688 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Shorn of details, the case of the petitioner is that the second respondent has ignored the directions issued by the Ombudsman in Ext.P1 order and put up a compound wall blocking the access to her land. In my opinion, if the second respondent or any other person has blocked the access to the petitioner's land, her remedy lies in moving the competent civil court seeking appropriate reliefs. If the pathway is a public one, the petitioner can also move the Revenue Divisional Officer. In my opinion, the petitioner cannot straight away move this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed leaving open the petitioner's contentions and reserving liberty with her to seek appropriate reliefs in other appropriate forums. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. nj.