IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23100 of 2010 1. PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH @ PRAMOD KUMAR MAHTO & 2. AJAY KUMAR MAHTO @ AJAY KR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in a case under sections 392 and 412 of the I.P.C. The petitioners submit that they are in custody for over 8 months. They submit that the prosecution case does not seem to be convincing. The informant has stated in his FIR that his motorcycle was snatched at Pachpaika village. Thereafter he informed his son on mobile phone who came to look for the motorcycle and found the same being run by three persons at Piparpaithi chowk. Thereafter, it is alleged that all the three accused abandoned the motorcycle. It is submitted that one of the seizure list witnessses is another son of informant. Petitioners have no antecedent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners as above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in Ujiarpur Police Station case no. 157 of 2009. Petitioners would not be absent physically for more than two consecutive dates at a stretch till three witnesses are examined in trial, otherwise their bail bond would be cancelled 2 and he would be taken into custody. One of the bailors of the petitioners would be a govt. servant. If the petitioners are made accused in other serious offences, the bail bond of instant case would also be liable to be cancelled. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)