1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 762 of 2010 [Vaibhav Pradip Palikundwar Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. F.T. Mirza, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.B. Yengal, APP for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 04th May, 2010. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. F.T. Mirza for the applicant and learned APP Mr. D.B. Yengal for the respondent. 2. Perused the First information Report and documents accompanying the application. 3. The applicants claims that he has no concern, whatsoever, with the crime registered against the proprietor of “Dainak Mahavidarbha. 4. Perusal of documents reveals that the applicant is not involved, in any way, in the crime in question. 5. The applicant is, therefore, entitled to the protection sought for. 2 6. In the event of arrest in connection with Crime No. 60/2010 registered with Police Station, Rajura, Distt. Chandrapur, for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 469 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a Personal Bond and a Solvent Surety in a sum of Rs.2,000-00 [rupees two thousand only]. Judge |Hedau|