IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26065 of 2011 Umesh Ray, son of Sri Bindeshwar Ray Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 20.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 120B, 302, 201, 494 and 498 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the Informant’s sister and one child disappeared from her in-laws house and it was suspected that the petitioner being the husband had done them to death. It has been submitted that the petitioner was travelling with his wife and children from Ambala, Chandigarh and his wife disappeared at Muzaffarpur. So information was given by the petitioner to the Rail Police, Muzaffarpur, on 15.10.2009. Two months later the present case was instituted. In the entire case diary there is no single word as to why the petitioner would have caused the disappearance of his wife or child. One of the children is still with the petitioner. Considering the same, let the petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 5 of 2010, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)