IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17645 of 2009 1. MD.SALIM @ SALIM 2. MD HAFIZ @ HAFIZ 3. JUTHIYA KHATOON @ JUTIYA 4. MD. NIZAMUDDIN @ NIZAM 5. HAIYA 6. MD.SAMSUL @ SAMSUL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.09.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners who are in-laws of the complainant, have approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in case instituted under section 498A IPC and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case arises out of a complaint. It is contended that the complainant has made an effort to implicate all the family members including the close relative. Petitioner nos.1 and 2 are brothers-in-law. Petitioner nos.3 is the mother-in-law. Petitioner no.4 is maternal father-in-law. Petitioner no.5 is the married Nanad, whereas petitioner no.6 is the father-in-law. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complaint discloses general and omnibus allegation. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners abovenamed in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Khagaria in connection with Complaint Case no.276C/2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )