IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.857 of 2007 RAMJI TIWARI S/O LATE RAMDEO TIWARI, R/O VILL. BANDIPUR, P.S. RAMGARH, DIST. KAIMUR --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MALTI GUPTA W/O RAM AVTAR GUPTA R/O VILL AND P.S. RAMGARH, DIST. KAIMUR 3. BHOLA KUMHAR SON OF SAGAR KUMHAR 4. SUMESHWAR RAM @ SUMESHWAR KUMHAR S/O BHOLA KUMHAR BOTH R/O VILL. BANDIPUR, P.O. & P.S. RAMGARH, DIST. KAIMUR 5. RAM BACHAN PANDEY SON OF MANGAL PANDEY, R/O VILL. SOUTHA, POLICE STATION DURGAWATI, DIST. KAIMUR, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUGURPURA, P.S. RAMGARH, DIST. KAIMUR. 6. VIJOY KOHAR @ VIJAY SHANKAR KOHAR SON OF BHOLA KOHAR, R/O VILL. BANDIPUR, P.S. RAMGARH, DIST. KAIMUR. 7. LALLAN SINGH SON OF TELHU KOIRI, R/O VILL. AND P.S. RAMGARH, DIST. KAIMUR. ---OPP.PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr.Siddharth Harsh Advocate. For the O.P. nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP. ----------- 06 09.08.2010 Both parties present. The present application has been filed by the informant of the case calling in question the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by learned trial Court in Sessions Trial no. 19 of 2002. Both parties agree that the State of Bihar preferred the Government appeal (DB) no. 39 of 2007 (State of Bihar versus Malti Gupta & others) against the present judgment and order of acquittal dated 15.06.2007,passed in Sessions Trial no. 19 of 2002, which has been dismissed by a well reasoned order dated 31st January, 2008. Learned counsel for the opposite party has 2 handed in a certified copy of the said order which is kept on record marked ‘X’. Consequently, the present application is also dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)