THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA C.M.A.No.2645 of 2003 17th June, 2010 Between :- Sai Modern Rice mIll rep. by its Managing Partner D.Vijaya Laxmi and another .. Appellants And The Union Bank of India Rep. by its Branch Manager, Chappadandi and another .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA C.M.A.No.2645 of 2003 ORDER:- An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the C.M.A. had been preferred. It is stated by Sri Bankatlal Mandhani in the light of the confusing legal position, the C.M.A. had been preferred at the relevant point of time. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion on this aspect. But however it is made clear that inasmuch as the C.R.P. alone is maintainable, liberty is given to the Counsel for appellants to convert the same into C.R.P. after completing the necessary formalities. _____________________ Justice P.S.Narayana 17th June, 2010 smr THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA C.M.A.No.2645 of 2003 17th June, 2010