IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1779 OF PETITION NO.1779 OF PETITION NO.1779 OF 2006 Kashinath Krishna Zadane...Petitioner Vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors.Respondents Mr. F. Pooniwala i/b. Kanga & Co., for the Petitioner Mr. G.D. Utangale, for respondent No.1. Mr. S.A. Sawant, for respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 18TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner has been held to be eligible to be provided alternate accommodation in the S.R.A. Scheme. The building has already been constructed. It appears that presently no premises are available in the building constructed under the S.R.A. scheme. 3. On behalf of the Respondent No.1 their learned Counsel makes a statement that they would accommodate the petitioner in a PAP tenement in Jijamata Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, at Mahalakshmi within two weeks from today. Statement accepted. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J).