CL^ ^€7^~) ^^nste B®nch IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTrSGARHATBILASPUR W.P.rStNO. ^^ [ 2011 PETITIONERS ^ J ^ 1. Smt. Amrita Singh, W/o. Shri Radheshyam Singh, Aged about 42 years, R/o. Mangla, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.). 2r" Abhishek Singh, S/o. Shri Rampratap Singh, aged about 29 years, R/o. Masturi, Distt. BUaspur (C.G.) f 3. Smt. Tarini Sharma, W/o. Manoj Sharma, Aged about 29 years, R/o. VUIage - Sivni Champa, Distt. Janjgir Cham.pa. (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh 'Hirough - The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. ^ Bhawan, Raipur C.G.) 2. The Chief Execution Officer, ZUa Panchayat Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE226QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS VERSUS l." « ^^ ^y^^' ^ ^^^ WIGH COURT QF CHHATTISaARH AT BIfcASPUR SB : HOHfBLE MR. JUSTICB PRITXNKKR DIWAKBR ^TJTSQNBR RJBSPONDEWTs W.P.fSi.NO. 3878/2011 Smt* Amrita Singh & .Othera ver^yi State of Chhattisgarh 8s Others Shri A.N.Pandey, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. A,G, for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (20.07.2011) Qrievance of the petitioners in the preaent petition is that though they were selected for the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-I, their candidature has wron^y been rejected on the ground that they haws obtained B.Bd. degree from Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad Uttar Pradesh which axording to the respondents is not recognized, Counsel for the petitioners submite'that thou^i m the initial llst names of the petitioners were included but subsequently upon objection being raised during counseling the candidature of the petitioners have not been considered. State counsel submits that the petitioners have an altemativQ remedy under Rule 13 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat ghikaha Kanni (Recruitment and Conditions of Service] Rules 2007 and therefore the petitioners should approach the appeBate authority. At this stage, oounsel for the petition^re submits that h@ may be permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty t^ file appeal before the Commissioner. The submission as made by the asunsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the Uberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of filing any such appeal by the petitioners^ the same would be decided on merits by the oompetwit authority expeditiously, It is made olear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at liberty to deeide the representation strictly in accordance with law. i Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge