INCLE BENCH ..^y ^ (^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^ILASPUR ^.... ^ W.P.( S) No....:^:.i.....'.......^../2011 PETITIONER: Rajesh Paul Masih S/o Late S. Ram Masih, Aged about 39 Years, R/o Anugrah, Behind Chitalia Rice Mill, Kondagaon, Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: / ^..' ,^>-^ !%^ ^^^w ^yy ,x- <,.;*•''' ^^ '...^ $y-" State of CKhattisgarh Through • the Director, Health Services, Duectorate, Health Service, Old Nursing Hostel, Opposite Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. CoUector South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) -3. Additional Collector South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) 4. Chief Medical and Health Officer District South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) 5. Shri R. K. Jatav Disfa-ict President, Chhattisgarh Pradesh Swastha Karmachari Sangh, Badegudra, District Dantewada (CG) PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR, ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIQRARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- Y ',•-)* HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S) No. 3701 of 2011 Petitjpner Rajesh Paul Masih VERSUS ResDondent State of Chhattisgarh and Others Priya Present: Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A. forthe State / respondents No.1 to 4. OR D E R (13.07.2011j Challenge in the present petition is to the suspension order dated 01.06.2011 (AnnexureP-1) by which the petitioner has been susoended. 2. Shri Pali fairly submits that against the suspension order, the petitioner has remedy of filing appeal and therefore, at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty to file the appeal before the Secretary, State Government. He however submits that the appellate authority be directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner expeditiously. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection jf the petitioner files any such appeal against the suspension order. 4. In these facts and ciroumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to fjle an appeal as provided under the law before the competent authority and in the event of flling of this appeal, the same sha!l be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of the said appeal. It is made ciear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the aDpeal in accordance with law after considerina the facts and circumstances of the case. ——— —— —— Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker,"! Judge