IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2007 / 27TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 28694 of 2007(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.STEPHEN PARANKIMAVILA VEEDU,MANNADIKONAM RUSSELLPURAM PO, BALARAMAPURAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPT.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KSRTC REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN FOR R1 ADV.SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN SC FOR R2 AND R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.28694 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of October, 2007 JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: “ i) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to allow light duty category to him considering his physical conditions and allow to continue him in the present post. ii) To declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue in light duty and that Ext.P10 has no binding effect. iii) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the second respondent to take favourable decision on Ext.P11 as expeditiously as possible. iv) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to opt for a lower category if so found necessary and until then to permit him to continue in the present duty.”. According to the petitioner he has serious health problem. I heard learned counsel for the respondent also. Learned counsel WPC No.28694/07 2 for the petitioner submits that after the filing of the writ petition by memorandum dated 09/10/2007 petitioner is sanctioned light duty for a further period of three months and in the light of the said memorandum, no orders are necessary in this writ petition. Writ petition is closed. I make it clear that I am not expressing on the contentions of the petitioner and I leave them open. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) sv. WPC No.28694/07 3