IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 11TH MAY 2010 / 21ST VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14612 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.A.NASEER KHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. ALIKUNJU, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, VELLARAPPILLI SOUTH.P.O., SREEMOOLANAGARAM, VIA ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, GANDHI NAGAR, COCHIN. 2. MANNUEL.P.P. PROPRIETOR, M/S. MANNUEL HATCHERY, SOUTH VELLARAPPILLY.P.O. SREEMOOLANAGARAM, ALUVA. R1 BY ADV. MR. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, PCB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 14612 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 11th May , 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the Writ Petition has already been taken up before the first respondent by filing Ext. P5 representation and that the petitioner will be satisfied if the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent. 3. Taking note of the limited prayer now pressed before this Court, it is not found necessary to issue notice to the second respondent for the time being. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext. P5 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the second respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, W.P.(C) No. 14612 OF 2010 2 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the first respondent for further action. It is also made clear that if the second respondent has preferred any application for 'consent' before the first respondent, the petitioner shall also be given an opportunity of hearing on such application filed by the second respondent while finalising the proceedings. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk