IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Arb. Case No.28 of 2011 Date of decision : December 1, 2011 M/s Suryavanshi Construction Company …Petitioner. Versus M/s Suni High Tech Engineers Ltd. and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) The alleged agreement between the parties provides for resolution of disputes, by named Officers of the respondents, i.e. Executive Director/Managing Director. Petitioner, without having approached the said Executive Director or the Managing Director, has come to this forum, for appointment of Arbitrator. Since the agreement names a person for the settlement of disputes, arising between the parties, the right course for the petitioner is to approach that person. Petitioner’s counsel, when apprised of this factual position, seeks to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the aforesaid named person, for settlement of the dispute. Hence, the present petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the named person, for settlement of the alleged dispute. Petition stands disposed of. December 1, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J