IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-7220 of 2008 Date of decision:-01.4.2008. Jagdish Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. D.N.Ganeriwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Brar, DAG Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegations in the complaint, it was the complainant who had allegedly approached the petitioner and Sarabjit Singh for sending them abroad. In fact the name of the petitioner is mentioned in the FIR otherwise he has no connection with the entire dealing. Even the agreement which has been executed by Sarabjit Singh is not signed by the petitioner though his name is mentioned therein. The allegation that the petitioner had returned a sum of Rs.50,000/- in cash to the complainant is false. In fact it is Sarabjit Singh who had returned the money to the complainant by way of two cheques of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.4,00,000/-. Without opining on the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case of arrest, the petitioner namely Jagdish Singh son of Shri Pal Singh shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation. He Crl. Misc. No. M-7220 of 2008 -2- shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. 1st April, 2008. (RAJESH BINDAL) asija JUDGE