srk IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 7470 OF 2009 Hilaire D’Souza & Ors. .. Petitioners vs Ramnek M. Parekh & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. R.S. Tripathi, Advocate for Petitioners. None for Respondents. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J DATE: 4th September, 2009. P.C. 1 Not on board. Taken on board. 2 The grievance of the petitioners is that the advocate appointed by them who is representing them before the Appeal Bench of the Court of the Small Causes has declined to give no objection for engaging another advocate. If the petitioners desire to discharge their advocate, they will have to follow the procedure laid down in sub-rule 5 of Rule 8 of the Rules framed by the High Court under section 34 (1) of the Advocates Act, 1961. In the circumstances, no interference is called for with the impugned order. The petitioners can always follow the procedure laid down in the above referred rules for discharging their advocate. The petition is disposed of. 3 The appellant court will not proceed in the matter for two weeks from today to enable to the petitioner take appropriate steps. Judge.