IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1084 of 2010 Banita Rani, W/O Mahesh Prasad Advocate, R/O Mohalla Budha Colony, P.S. Budha Colony, Distt.- Patna --- Petitioner---- Appellant. Versus 1. Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna through its Chairman 2. Executive Engineer, New Capital Division, P.E.S.U. Patna 3. Sri Gauri Shankar Jha, Assistant Engineer, Electricity, Revenue, P.E.S.U., Patna 4. Sri Naresh Prasad Yadav, Assistant Engineer, Supply N.C.Division, P.E.S.U., Patna 5. Sri P.N.Srivastava, Junior Engineer, Supply, P.E.S.U., Patna ----- Respondents ----- Respondents. ----------- 4. 12.7.2011 Heard Mr. Mahesh Prasad No.2 for the appellant, and Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh for the respondents. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been preferred by the petitioner of C.W.J.C No. 3229 of 2003, and is aggrieved by the order dated 6.4.2010, whereby the writ petition has been allowed in part, and it has been held that the tariff in question could not have been retrospectively made applicable. Consequently, the learned Single Judge has directed for refund of the amount paid by the writ petitioner under duress. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the 2 parties. The matter was taken up earlier. We had advised learned counsel for the respondents to be ready today with the Cheque carrying the amount directed to be refunded as per the order of the learned Single Judge. In view of compliance of our direction, learned counsel for the respondents has just now handed over Cheque no. 365212, dated 11.7.2011, for Rs.21,940/-, along with statement showing the calculation, to the learned counsel for the appellant. We entirely agree with the order of the learned Single Judge. We do not wish to proceed further in this matter. The appeal is dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) ( Vikash Jain, J.)