:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.3 OF 200 200 2003 Smt. Rupa Suyog Sheth, .. Appellant Vs Shri Suyog Ramesh Sheth, .. Respondent Mr N.B.Shah, for the appellant. Mr D.C.Shah, for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.B.MHASE & : S.B.MHASE & : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 22, 2005. : MARCH 22, 2005. : MARCH 22, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Both sides are present. Their Advocates are present. Their advocates have identified the parties. Husband and wife have settled the matter between them and they submitted the consent terms. They have taken a divorce by mutual consent and accordingly have confirmed the decree. By way of permanent alimony, Rs.3,50,000/- have been paid in lumpsum by a Demand Draft as stated in paragraph 2 of the consent terms. Parties have understood the consent terms and they have voluntarily signed the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. We accept the consent terms. The Family Court Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms. (D.B.BHOSALE, (D.B.BHOSALE, (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) J.) J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.) :2: :2: :2: /rrt/db-05/db-22305/fca3-03