IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13773 of 2007 MD.NASEEM AHMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 04.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner originally came to this Court with a claim for appointment on the post of Panchayat Teacher in the subject of Urdu with the grievance that the person with lesser marks than him has been appointed in August, 2006 after coming into force of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 with effect from 1.7.2006. That the petitioner had also represented against the same. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel submits that the statutory authority under Rule 18 of the aforesaid Rules presently Respondent no. 6 has passed orders by letter no. 1002 dated 21.9.2007 annulling the appointment of the candidates selected illegally and giving directions for proceeding in accordance with law as per the merit list. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the disposal of this writ application in the following terms. If what the petitioner contends be correct and the statutory authority has passed any order cancelling illegal selection and giving directions for proceeding afresh under the merit list, the issue becomes purely administrative requiring no order of this Court. Let the authority proceed in accordance with law. The writ application is disposed. AKS (Navin Sinha, J.) - 2 -