IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9197 of 2010 HARIPAL SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Dayal, learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is named by co-accused in his confession. Allegedly the suspected motorcycle for committing loot and other stolen motorcycle of another incident are said recovered from his (petitioner’s) house. It clearly shows criminal antecedent of the petitioner in same nature of cases. Claim is made to be identified by the informant and the person who was accompanying him. Further, confession leading to recovery is also expected. If that is taken into consideration, it appears that petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)