1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.3097/2007 (Indraj & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan) DATE OF ORDER : July 10, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.M.K.Garg, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for State. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application filed by petitioner No.1 Indraj, who is husband of the complainant. The bail application filed by petitioner No.1 Indraj is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. However, petitioner No.2 Vinod alias Manoj is brother-in- law of the complainant and according to the learned counsel for the petitioner he is nothing to do with the dowry articles. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I consider it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner No.2. Accordingly, the bail application filed by petitioner No.2 under section 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the 2 event of arrest of petitioner No.2 Vinod alias Manoj s/o Keshra Ram in FIR No.42/2007, Police Station, Dudwa Khara, Distt. Churu, he shall be released on bail for a period till the police concludes the investigation and files the challan provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- along with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer to surrender and appear before the trial court on the date of filing of the challan after conclusion of the investigation on the following conditions:- (i)That he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. The petitioner No.2 shall surrender before the trial court on the date of filing of the challan. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-