1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2151 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2151 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2151 OF 2004 Parshuram Rangrao Sutar .. Applicant. V/s. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. ----- Shri Pratap Patil for the Applicant. Shri V.B. Konde Deshmukh, APP for Respondent ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 27.10.2004 DATED : 27.10.2004 DATED : 27.10.2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. Having regard to the materials on record I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. However, as the applicant is already in custody for almost one year, the appropriate course to my mind is to direct the trial court to expedite the hearing of the case. The concerned District Judge shall earmark the trial of the case to Fast Track Court to ensure early disposal. In the event, the trial is not concluded by end of July, 2005, the Applicant may renew his request for bail before this court. 2 3. In the event the trial court is of the opinion that the applicant is responsible for delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the Rozanama, which will be taken into account while considering the proposed bail appilcation to be filed by the applicant as referred above. .....