-J I'HEmGHCOURT QFJTJDICaTOREIN eHHATTISGARH AT BIL W.P. No. :^8@,72E^ FETmQNER: YIDYA SAGARAGRAWAL - Advocate, Aged 66 years, S/o, Late Shri J.F.Agrawal R/o. JainMandir Road, Baniya Para, Durg (Chhattisgarh) Versus RESTONDENTS / <l)^t^ofChhattisgarh- . [•ai^hthe Seeretaiy- Law & Legislariye Afi&irs Department, . ^£^S@ •tewnrougnme aeeFeiaiy^aw & ^egsian ",n^£k^^1"'^- Govt.ofehliattisgarh,DauKalyan SinghShawan (Chhattisgarh) ETFII0Nt)NI»»AICritI^226/227QFTHECONSTIIXFT^ -V :'"^;K,"i •fw-if »ii*«?ffa>*nw '3^'<{t*tt<r(*(, »Tt)«*ie;[sfMt'y^ . 'w^'S-^^s'/o- •'V'^-t^S "ff- •KS^ '%^! sn^t ^H^ 3B^!I <»IKtW E¥E !»"*tt<ft s«iriEK^8^<i<»fi^fi 22.12.2004 On a mentioa beiag made, tl^e case is tafaen up for heariag. Shri. H.B. Agarwal, counsel ^ir the petitiorteT. Shri Praaiod Kuinar Vemi^, Additional Advocate Oeriefal for thc State. By this petition under Articl the petitioner has chaUenged fhe P-1) whereby fhe application pf license to practice as Public Notai^ The pctitioner^s casc is tha^ assigniag aay reason. I have heard teamed couasei penod of threc years was not iu Ucense of the petitioner ought to five years, whereas vide order 14.1 also not taken iato considerationf passiag the impugned order ou a{ suffered a-repatabte loss, Counsel) WlfeS<B+ twal" ? is'dl tjaitiR ^ sfEa*f S^E^ ^ ^ 226/227 of Constttution of Inxlia s {ader dated 26.12.2002 (Aimfixure ? [the .petttioner for renewal of his wasrejected. ,—'- his applicatioa was rcjected witfaoSI1"; for ffae parties. Leanied counsel for the ;pc(itiDner subiaitted that even order Aunexure P-10 whereby the p^i|ioner's terin was extended for a ;9nsoaance with fhc provisions of amended Notarics Act. As per a|nended Act w.e.f, 1'7.12.1999 the |iave been rciiewed firt- a period of .2000 (Aanexure P-10) his Ucease has been rehewed oitly for a peri<(d of three yeara aad ftus fact was by fhc respondcnt at the diae of :coun.t ofwhlch the petltioner has ifurther submits that nbw fhe term ofthe petitioner has expired on 1^,11.2004, tterefore, tlle petitioner inay beaUowed to niake a deteils^ representatKMi to the. respoiident forredrcssalofhis gricvaaccs, (KFRS-fSi7K —9f3XK—5a,00». '3^ ^nw^, yflly'is, IsfCTi'tty Sf^V '*!5[^ ('ipf^q^) TOISnt^TWS? i?/' iti!;i s^iN< •ist^tt <an^?i -1 uil6 The request made by leam be fair aad reasonable, to which has no objection. Having heard leamed couii to the facts aad cu-cuaistaiices oi make a detaited representation 1 davs from today raisiag aU his shatl consider fhe representatio laaruier and pass aa appropriate the grievances raised by the petiti With the above direction, tl Certified copy as per rules. flOTf?Pft;t''WRff ^f ft"3t <|a|t!,K ^ aiRin 3ii^t ^d counsel for petitioner appears to leamed Additional Advocate General sel for the parties aud haviag regard thc casc, the pctitioncr is allowcd to ^> respondent within a period of 15 Igrievaaces aad ia tum respondent ^t of, the petitioner in an objective reasoned oider after considexiag aU oner within aaothcr thirty days. ie petition stands disposed of. L.C. Bhadoo CK.PRJ—FS/7B—.S>/200(-50,000. €? M '? " ^ ^