THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2801 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, who is the defendant in O.S.No.100 of 2008, aggrieved by order, dated 13.06.2011 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, in I.A.No.445 of 2011. The said suit is filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of money on the ground that he has lent money to the petitioner/defendant. The suit is of 2008. It is stated that when the trial has begun, the petitioner/defendant filed I.A.No.445 of 2011 under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC seeking to frame following additional issues: 1. Whether the plaintiff is having money lending license? 2. Whether the plaintiff is a moneylender? In the counter-affidavit filed in the said I.A., it is specifically pleaded by the respondent/plaintiff that he is not a moneylender. In fact, in the very plaint, it is the case of the respondent/plaintiff that he has pooled up the money and lent such amount to the petitioner/defendant. There is also no evidence to show that the respondent/plaintiff has transacted such business with any other third person. It is well settled that one single transaction of money lending will not amounts to doing business in money lending, within the meaning of definition of ‘money lending’ under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Money Lenders Act, 1349 Fasli. In that view of the matter, in view of clear admission of the respondent/plaintiff that he is not a moneylender, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the Court below dismissing I.A.No.445 of 2011 filed for framing additional issues. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 26th JULY, 2011. kvni