IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2011 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 1024 of 2010 ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.1840/2009 Dated 10/08/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------ 1. SECRETARY,HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HOMOEOPATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVACIS RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ----------------------------- DR.MAYA MATHEW,W/O.MATHEW,GOVT.HOMOEO DISPENSARY,NEDIYASALA,THODUPUZHA. BY SRI.RAJU JOSEPH, SENIOR ADVOCATE ADV.SRI.C.N.MIDHUN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 11/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.N.Ravindran, J. ------------------------------------------ C.M.Appln.No.173 of 2010 & R.P.No.1024 of 2010 in W.A. No. 1840 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of March, 2011 ORDER Ravindran, J. C.M.Appln.No.173 of 2010 is filed to condone the delay of 40 days in filing the review petition. Sri.C.N.Midhun takes notice for the sole respondent. Heard Sri.Benny Gervacis, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the applicants and Sri.Raju Joseph, learned senior counsel appearing for the sole respondent. The respondent does not oppose the prayer to condone the delay in filing the review petition. In such circumstances accepting the reasons given in the affidavit filed in support of the application, we condone the delay of 40 days in filing the review petition. R.P.No.1024 of 2010 Heard Sri.Benny Gervacis, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the review petitioners. We have also perused the review petition. A reading of the review petition R.P.No.1024 of 2010. - 2 - indicates that what the review petitioners seek is a rehearing of the writ appeal, which is not permissible in review. We therefore find no grounds to entertain the review petition. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.N.Ravindran, Judge vns