IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1042 of 2011 Kripa Shankar Shukla, aged about 55 years, S/O Late Raj Narain Shukla, presently posted as Upper Division Assistant, Office of the Advocate General, Uttarakhand, Nainital. … Petitioner. Versus The Advocate General, State of Uttarakhand, Nainital. … Respondent. Ms. Puja Banga, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent. Date August 19, 2011. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief A pplication No. 8345/2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only prayer made in this writ petition is for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 7-6-2010 in accordance with law within a time frame. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner is aggrieved by the seniority list and that the petitioner has already made a representation to the respondent on 7-6-2010 for redressal of his grievance, which has been annexed as Annexure No.-7 to the writ petition and that the representation is still pending. Prayer made by the petitioner is innocuous. The respondent is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 7-6-2010 (Annexure No.7 to the writ petition) as prayed for, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma, J.) RCP