IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11567 of 2010 MD.ZAFIR @ ZAFIR ALAM @ ALI RAJA, SON OF LATE MD. YASIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURAITH, POLICE STATION ARER, DISTRICT MADHUBANI.------- PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR---- OPP.PARTY. . ----------- For petitioner : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, A.P.P. -------- 2/ 28.04.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1060 of 2009 corresponding to T.R. No.2219 of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he happens to be father-in-law of the complainant and there is no allegation of torture against him. Only allegation is that the petitioner and other accused persons made a demand of dowry for the purpose of business by the husband of the complainant. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the primal role for committing the crime in question is against the husband of the complainant and not against the petitioner, who is father-in-law of the complainant, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- - 2 - with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in Complaint Case No. 1060 of 2009/ T.R. No. 2219 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/