IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 3401 of 2008(E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER-IN-CHARGE OF HEAD, MARKETING DIVISION, S.I.D.CO. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. JAGADEMMA S.NAIR, PROPRIETRIX, SREESAI ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES, POWDIKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.3401/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 11/10/06 BY 3RD RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS. P3 COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT OF SIDCO BEFORE LOK AYUKTA. P4 COPY OF THE ORDER IN COMPLAINT DATED 25/10/07OF LOK AYUKTA. P5 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27/11/2007 IN WP(C)35040/07 OF HIGH COURT. P6 COPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION DATED 28/11/2007 BEF0RE THE LIK AYUKTA. P7 COPY OF THE APPLICATION TO CONDONE THE DELAY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 3401 of 2008 E ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ By Ext.P4 order dated 25.10.2007, the Lok Ayukta passed an order requiring the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.63,668/- to the third respondent. This order itself shows that it was passed based on the admission made by the petitioner in the statement filed by it before the Lok Ayukta. Petitioner challenged Ext.P4 order before this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.35040/007 and by Ext.P5 judgment, this Court disposed of the writ petition, relegating the petitioner to seek review of the order before the Lok Ayukta itself. Accordingly, petitioner filed Ext.P6 application for review along with Ext.P7 application for condoning delay in filing Ext.P6. 2. During the pendency of the review petition, this writ petition was filed on 28.01.2008 seeking to direct the Lok Ayukta to keep Ext.P4 in abeyance. The case came up W.P.(C) No.3401/2008 : 2 : for admission before this Court on 31.01.2008 and is coming up again for admission only today. As already seen, Ext.P4 order was passed by the Lok Ayukta acting upon the admission of the petitioner. Challenge against Ext.P4 stands already rejected by Ext.P5. It was therefore that the review was sought for by the petitioner. 3. Facts being so, remedy, if any, open to the petitioner is to obtain orders on Ext.P6 rather than filing this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/03/12 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge