s" '^ •^' A ^ <7^?(^. SINGlEfiEljl IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATtISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION TC1 N0. Q,S'^ /2010 PBTITIONER RBSPONDENTS Hari Sinha @ Hari Prasad Singh, S/ o Late Lalji Singh, aged about 64 years, R/o Siijabar, District Banaras, (U.P.), present address Village Gamharia, Tahsil & District Jashpur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. "• State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Mantralaya, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgah 2. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3. Krishna Kumar, Trustee, Baba Bhawan Ram Trust, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF eONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly begs fo submit as under:- H^ mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra W.P.fONo. 3372/2010 PETITIONER : HariSinha RESPONDENTS : Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Ors. Aopearance: Shri Thakur Vijay Singh,Advocate with Shri S.S. Rajput, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for respondent No.3 on caveat. Shri A.S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondentsNo.l and2. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORALORDER (09.07.2010) Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that by an order passed by Collector, Jashpur on 11 July, 2008, his application for renewal of the license to run petrol pump under C.G. Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Oil (Licensee Control) Order, 1980 was rejected, against which he preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Sarguja, which remained pending till 5th June, 2010, when the same was withdrawn by the petitioner on finding that the Commissioner has not been clothed with the appellate power under the Control Order. He submits that he moved an appeal before the '^ State Govemment under Clause 16 ofthe Control Order, however, ^^i^t^'M^^tttl^^^'^iilt^^ •i.;.::'. ''•'-'.'::.'''' ,/':'\:';".'.;:1''';; •'• ..^ 1 \ ^•':^'\'l:;-:i:;-..'l'^-\;.';''<-^i '''';:-^ ".. ::1 1'' '; :' 1;.1':::1,;'.1''1^<0.::'" v the appeal has not yet been taken up for hearing, though he has also moved an application for grant ofstay/interim relief. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner has prayed tiiat he only seeks a direction to the appellate authority to take up the matter for hearing. 3. In view ofthe limited prayer made in this petition, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.l/appellate authority to take up the appeal as well as application for inferim relieffor hearing and to do well to dispose ofthe same in accordance with law within a period ofsix month. prashantKumarMishra