THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. No. 6002 of200S SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRUUSTICE S.R.NAYAK, C.J. ". PETITIONER Ma Bamleshwari Swayat Sahkari PrattiTnils.Upbhokta Bhandar Mry. Anjora, Through, Roshaa Lal Deslunukh, Presideat Ma Bamleshwari Swayat Sahkari Prathinik Upbhokta Bhaadar Mry. Ao.jora R/o ViUage Anjora (B), Graia Panchayat Anjora (B), Block & DistrictDurg(C.G.). VERSUS RESI'ONDENTS State of Chhatdsgarh, ThTough Secretary, ^ Departinent of Food and Civfl Supplies aad Gonsuxaer Prptection Departaient, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). CoUector (Food) Durg Dista-ict-DLirg (C.G.). The Sub-Division OfScer Durg, District-Durg (C.G.j. The DistrictFood Of&cer, Duig District Duig (C.G.). II 1 i I -lliu- Mr. Aviuafh Mishia, coim.sel for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarali yenna, Pauel lawyer for fhe respondents/State. ORAL ORDER I (9th December, 2005) Learaed Govt. Advoeate subinits that against the impugned order aa appeal Ues to fh.e District CoUector under Clause 18 of fhe notificationdated 23.12.2004. I do not find aay weighty or substantive ground which could peisuade the court to pennit the petitioner to straightway approach fhis court uiider Ardcle 226 of the Constitution of India without exhausting altemative statutoiy reinedy. On that grouiid, the writ petition is disinissed, keepiu^ open aU conten.tions raised in this petition to be agitated before the Distnct CoUector, if the petitioner ffles appeal as provided under Clause 18 ofthe afore-inentioned notification. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice m