IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18919 of 2011 1. Sanjay Kumar Son Of Sri Raj Kishor Das Resident Of Village-Bhawanitola, P.S.-Maner, District-Patna. 2. Shyam Pathak Son Of Late Ramdeo Pathak Resident Of Ivllage-Maulabag, Garju Ka Bagicha, P.S.-Nawada, District-Bhojpur. 3. Zeyad Jaidi Son Of Saffi Alam Resident Of Mohalla-Brah Batra, P.S.-Town, District-Bhojpur (Arah). 4. Jailal Kumar Son Of Sri Jitnarayan Rai Resident Of Ivllage-Majgwan, P.S.- Town. District-Bhojpur. 5. Rajkumar Singh Son Of Sri Mahesh Prasad Resident Of Village-Brahbatra, P.S.-Town, Distirct-Bhojpur. 6. Dasrath Prasad Son Of Late Keso Ram Resident Of Village-Brabhatra, P.S.- Town, District-Bhojpur. 7. Sanjit Kumar Son Of Sri Nagendra Prasad Singh Resident Of Village-Rampur Diara, P.S.-Maner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Inspector General (Human Rights), Bihar, Patna. 4. The Inspector General (Bihar Military Police), Bihar, Patna. 5. The Chairman, Central Recruitment Board-Cum-Additional Inspector General S.C.R.B., Bihar, Patna. 6. The Chairman, Central Region Board No.1, Patna. 7. The Chairman, Central Region Board No.2, Patna. 8. The Chairman, Central Region Board No.2, Patna. 9. The Chairman, Magadh Region Board No.2, Patna. 10. The Chairman, Sahabad Region Board No.1, Bhgalpur. 11. The Chairman, Koshi Region, Madhepura. 12. The Chairman, Tirhut Region Board No.1, Muzaffarpur. 13. The Chairman, North Division, Board No.1, Bihar Military Police, Muzaffarpur. ----------- 2. 25.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.A.G.-2 for the respondents. The writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Constable pursuant to them having applied against Advertisement No. 1/2004, 2/2004. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner 2 submits that the present case is also covered by a decision of Division Bench of this Court dated 28.06.2011 passed in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. He submits that the present writ application may also be disposed off in similar terms. Learned counsel for the respondents does not contest this position. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is also disposed off in terms of the directions given in L.P.A. No. 831 of 2009 and its analogous cases. The case of the petitioners would be considered in the light of the aforesaid directions in accordance with law, if, they be found eligible to be considered. With the aforementioned directions the writ petition stands disposed off. Saif/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)