1 cri appln 3986.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3986 OF 2010 Shivhari Pandurang Nagare .. Applicant Versus Ravindra Eknath Marathe & another .. Respondents Shri K. B. Autade, Advocate h/f Shri R. A. Tambe, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri N. G. Shah, Advocate h/f Shri N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Smt. Y. M. Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. Though the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 vehemently opposed the application for condonation of delay, upon perusal of the contents of the application for condonation of delay, I find sufficient cause has been shown. Hence the application for condonation of delay is allowed and stands disposed of. [ S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/Feb. 11