.^^V.^^/L.'-L-^^^-^ '^^^^^l?k!^^^^frju"^'^u'?t^ R »ii BEFORETHEHIGHGOURTOPCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH ) WRIT PEtlTION (C )NO. 2> 2-J- / 2010 SytfGl.f BfNCH PETITIONER .y?^^ 5mt. <^^t%0^ '^.^-^Y^-1-"" 'o-^.-'-"" ^e- RESPONDENTS .,tfy,s"S B?EA y •s'i~'^v" /,. ^'m":':- s Sadhna Ahuja, widow of late ShriPrahlad RajAhuja.aged about 48 years, resident of Panchsheel Nagar, Civil Lines, Ward No.42, Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS : 1. 'rStateofChhatt(sgarhthroughthe Secretary (Adnriinistration, Town and Country Planning, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh • / ^ 2. Mynicipal Corporation, Raipur through its Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) :'^ 3. ZQne Executive-in-Charge, Zone No.3, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTIGLE226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OFINDIA. G^ HTGH COIJRT OF CHHATTTSOARH AT BR ,ASP1 IR WRTT PETmON ('C)No. 821 of2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENT8 Smt. Sadhna Ahuja. VRRSTJS State ofChhattisearh & Others. WMT PEITTION UNDER ARTtCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Aaniitotri, J. Present: None for the petrtioner. Slu-i Shashatik Thakur, Paael Lawyet-forthe State. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate for the respondents. QRnKRfQRAD (Passed on 12°'day ofOctober, 2011) 2. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any represeiitation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in piirsuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for waiit of proseciition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aarit