IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2010 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7888 of 2010(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.SALSABEEL CHARITABLE & EDUCATIONAL TRUST, PERAMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR, REP.BY ITS MANAGER P.H.HAMEED, 56, S/O.HASSAN, PODIPARACKAL HOUSE, 11/506, AMBADY LANE, KOKKALA, THRISSUR-680021. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KAIPARAMBU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUNDOOR P.O., REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GP K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------ WP(C) No. 7888 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated, this the 10th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P4, a notice issued by the 2nd respondent requiring them to demolish the structure which they have already constructed over building No. V/177A. Even according to the petitioner, Ext.P4 is an appealable order and this writ petition has been filed apprehending that before the appellate remedy is availed of, Panchayat might implement Ext.P4. 2. Taking into account the limited relief that is sought for by the petitioner that Ext.P4 may be suspended for a short period in order to enable them to pursue the appellate remedy, it is directed that status quo as on today insofar as Ext.P4 is concerned, shall be maintained for a period of three weeks from today. In the meanwhile, it will be open to the petitioner to pursue remedies that are available against Ext.P4. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the Panchayat on or before 12.3.2010, for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mrcs