IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3227 of 2011 Niranjan Kumar Singh @ Chhote Lal Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3. 21.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The original representation filed by the petitioner within time in pursuance of the order of the Court mentions Plot Nos. 164 and 165 also. The show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties states that these two plots have been restored by land filling. The assertion with regard to of Plot No. 177 by the petitioner appears to be an afterthought. The opposite parties from the letter dated 14.12.2009 of the petitioner annexed to the show cause by opposite party no. 8 states that he had agreed voluntarily to part with a portion of the same for road construction. It is not possible to hold any further enquiry in the contempt jurisdiction. The application is disposed in so far as the present jurisdiction is concerned. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)