r-- c^ Sra IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHAniSGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETITION (S } NO?^^F 2008 sh1 PETITIONER .*••'" ^'ss^s. 61^/-;^>^\^ ...-•-N^^-1-"" . .>&?•' i-SW'~ RESPONDENTS Satya Narayan Paikra Son of Sri Sada Ram, aged about 36 uears, working as an AssistantVetenaryField Officer, Vetenary Hospital, Lakhanpur, residenf of Bazar Para, Nagar Panchayat Lakhanpur, District: Surguja(CG) VERSUS : 1; 3; Stateof Chhattisgarhthroughthe Secretary, Agriculture (Animal Husbandary) Department, D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(CG) Director.Vetenary Serviees, Raipur(CG) The Collector, Surguj'a, Ambikapur District: Surguja (C G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HiGH COURT OFCHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) : Petition (S) No. 5494 of 2008 SaSyaNarayan Paikra. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri V.K. Pandey counsel for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain PL for the respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA O RD E R (09.07.2009) With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finaily. Chailenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 26.8.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.3 whereby the petitioner was transferred from Chatgali, Biock Pratappur to Veterinary Hospital, Lakhanpur, in violation of the transfer policy. This petition was filed on 25.9.2008and the stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 30.9.2008. Contention of the counsel for the psrties is that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by giving libertyto the respondents to pass fresh order if administrative exigency sowarrants. In view of fhe submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and looking to the fact that the petitionwas filed on 25.9.2008 andstay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 30.9.2008, the impugned order dated 26.8.2008 so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the respondents shall be free to pass the order afresh if administrative exigency necessitates the same. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. SA'.^a^ '~^-.