hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2250 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3576 OF 2008 Prakash Raghunath Shenai ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents Petitioner present in person. Mr. P.S. Sahadevan with Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 P.C. The grievance of the Petitioner was that though on 13.7.2009 this court had extended the time to file reply by six weeks, that reply has not been filed till the time is expired. The learned counsel seeks additional time of four weeks. As a last opportunity additional time is granted. We make it clear that if within four weeks, the reply is not filed, the concerned officer will have to remain present and explain to the court the reasons thereof. In so far as Prayer Clauses (a) and (b) are concerned, it will not be possible to grant reliefs at this stage. That would be considered at the final stage of hearing. In so far as Prayer Clause (c) is concerned if the records are required, the same will be called at the stage of final hearing. In so far as Prayer Clause (d) is concerned, that will be considered at the time of final hearing. With the above observations, application disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)