IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.15568 -M of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 6, 2011 ASHWANI KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for a direction to the respondents to report in regard to the car of the petitioner, which is subject matter of robbery and in regard to which, FIR No.118 dated 8.7.2010 under Sections 392, 307, 341, 342, 34, Indian Penal Code, read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, has been registered at Police Station, Tanda, District Hoshiarpur. It has been contended that the car has not been traced till date. 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Head Constable Joginder Singh, contends that, indeed, the car has not been traced till date. One accused, however, has been arrested. Other accused are yet to be arrested. Criminal Misc. No.15568 -M of 2011 2 3 Learned counsel for the respondent-State, however, states that so far as the factum of non-tracing of the car is concerned, a certificate in this regard would be issued to the petitioner by the concerned Station House Officer. 4 In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent-State, the petition is disposed of. July 6, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?