IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 3617 of 1987. [O&M] Date of Decision: 2nd August 2010. A.K.Mahajan & Ors. Petitioners through Mr. T.S.Dhindsa, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. H.S.Brar, Addl.AG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] This order shall dispose of CWP No. 3617 and 3284 of 1987 as common issues are involved in both the cases. The record reveals that vide order dated 12.06.1987, these writ petitions were ordered to be heard along with CWP No. 784 of 1987. The record of CWP No. 784 of 1987 further reveals that the said writ petition came up for hearing along with some other cases on 28.1.1988 when learned counsel for the Punjab Water Supply and Sewerage Board produced a notification dated 30.9.1987 whereby the employees of the Punjab Health Department stood allocated to the Punjab Water Supply and Sewerage Board on permanent basis. The said Writ Petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to impugn the said notification. In the case in hand, the petitioners have sought promotions against various posts, inter-alia, alleging that the employees from the Public Health Department are being illegally brought on deputation to occupy these posts. It is obvious that unless the petitioners successfully challenge the notification dated 30.9.1987 referred to above, the desired relief can not be granted to them. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioners to impugn the said notification, if so permissible in law. Dasti. August 02, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE