IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13899 of 2010 THE DIRECTOR,BAGAHA CONTRACTORS PVT. LTD., THROUGH IT DIRECTOR DHIRAJ KUMAR, S/O SRI PREM CHAND PRASAD, BHARGAWI COMPLEX BAGAHA-2, P.S.BAGAHA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN ----PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.CHIEF ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT, PATNA, BIHAR 3.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT AT & P.O. BETTIAH, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION BETTIAH (WEST CHAMPARAN) 5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT WORK DIVISION-2 AT & P.O. RAMNAGAR, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN 6.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S S.P.SINGALA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD KUMAR COMPLEX, FLAT NO. 601 BORING ROAD, PATNA-1 7.SUDHIR KUMAR JHA S/O NOT KNOWN PROJECT MANAGER, S.P.SINGALA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. SITE AT DHANAHA P.O. & P.S. DHANAHA, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN, BAGAHA 8.MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PATNA 9.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, WEST CHAMPARAN 10.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAGAHA POLICE DISTRICT BAGAHA, WEST CHAMPARAN---------------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- For the petitioner :M/S Manna Kumar Mishra, Sr.Advocate Ashutosh Tripathi, Advocate For the State :Mr.Ashok Kr.Dubey, AC to AAG 9 For respondent No.8:Mr.Sachhidanand Singh, Advocate ----- 3. 30.8.2010 Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the defect pointed out by the office is directed to be ignored. The petitioner has come to this Court seeking various directions like stopping of plying heavy loaded trucks over the length of road which has been awarded to him for construction under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana 2 which he claims have damaged the road. He also claims compensation and damages from the private respondents Nos. 6 & 7 and a further direction for extending the period of completion of work for a further period of one year from the date of stoppage of illegal plying of trucks. On a consideration of the various facts mentioned in the writ petition and the various Annexures brought on the record, specially Annexure-6, letter dated 24.5.2010 of the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division-2, Ramnagar, West Champaran, it appears that a large number of disputed questions of fact are involved in this case which it may not be appropriate to deal with in the writ jurisdiction of this Court. In the above circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Works Contract Arbitration Tribunal or any other appropriate forum for the redressal of his grievances. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/