IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2009 / 1ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2266 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SURENDRAN, S/O.SAVITHRIAMMA, MADATHIL HOUSE, EZHAKARANADU KARA, MANEEDU VILLAGE, MANEEDU PANCHAYATH. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI SRI.K.C.PAULOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE PRESIDENT, MANEEDU GRAMA PANCHAYATH MANEEDU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. MANEEDU, GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MANEEDU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.2266 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner wants to remove gravel from the property of the petitioner, for which a permission from the Panchayat is necessary. The petitioner apprehends that the petitioner's application for removal of gravel would be granted only with a condition that the gravel would not be transported outside the Panchayat area. The petitioner wants a permit without that condition. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent in this regard. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the same and pass orders thereon expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to respondents 1 and 2 for the present. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this w.p.c.2266/09 2 judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge