IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36547 of 2008 BIRAJI BHAGAT & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 304(B), 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners have been implicated in this case for ulterior purpose on account of enmity with the informant for which the case was filed against him in which information was given to Chief Judicial Magistrate as contained in Annexure-2. It is further submitted that these petitioners are living separately in distant place and not in the house in which the sister of the informant lives. Besides the above, there is no specific allegation against this petitioners. However, husband of the deceased is in custody as stated in paragraph-12 of the petition. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the - 2 - case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, namely, Biraji Bhagat, Vimal Devi and Rajeev Bhagat be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Musahari P.S. Case No. 43 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)