IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5935 of 2009 GOSAIN YADAV @ GOSAI YADAV, S/o Dorik Yadav, R/o Village-Partaha, P.S.- Nauhatta, District-Saharsa. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Chandra Shekhar Paswan, S/o Hirai Paswan, R/o Village-Bariyahi, P.S.-Nauhatta, District-Saharsa. ----------- 02. 16.08.2010 The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 07.07.2007 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 78 of 2006 (G.R. No. 1818 of 2006) by which he has taken cognizance under Sections 341, 323 and 504/34 IPC and Section 3(x) S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the revisional order of the Sessions Judge, Saharsa by which he has declined to interfere in the matter. The petitioner submits that even though petitioner was named in the First Information Report final report was submitted in his regard as also that cognizance was taken only under bailable offences and Section 3(x) S.C./S.T. Act. In my view, both the arguments are not tenable in the eye of law. In view of such, this application is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)