IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.86 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sanju @ Sanjeev ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.13 of 2009, U/Ss 395/397/412 IPC, P.S. Khanpur, Distt. Haridwar Dated: January 27, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant and Sri Nandan Arya, learned AGA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR. It was further argued that the alleged tractor trolley, which was said to be robbed on 26.1.2009, was recovered on 11.2.2009 from the possession of co-accused Nagendra Kumar, Pradeep and Sonu @ Parvez and the name of the present applicant was disclosed by those accused persons while in police custody. Further, the co-accused Nagendra, from whose possession the alleged robbed tractor-trolley was recovered, has been released on bail by this Court on 4.8.2009 and the present applicant also deserves bail on the ground of parity. Lastly, the applicant has got no criminal history before this case. After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and also on perusal of other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Sanju @ Sanjeev be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) Vacation Judge 27.1.2010 Rajeev Dang