;11/ ^i^z^t ^- S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(S) N0.^3^ / 2011. PETITIONERS: ^••c ,\^.^.. ->?s%^ ...'y...,<'f<v" • y...-^' 1. Basant Lal, son of Bishun Ram, aged about 37 years, working as Cook, Pahadi Korwa Ashram Chilma, Block Balrampur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 2. Sukhdev Ram, son of Dangu Ram, aged about 38 years, working as Waterman, Pahadi Konva Ashram, Sargadi, Block Balrampur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3\ Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Departinent, Sarguja,, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. §. Block Education Officer, Block Balrampur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA '^ss^ss^ HEGHCOURT.OPCHHATriSGARHATBILASPUR SB,:,HprBLBSHRI JUSTICBPmTINKBRDSWAKBR W.P.fS) N0. 4345/2011 PETITIONER Basant. Lal & Another Vcrsus REBPONDBNT8 State ofC.G. & O&ers ' WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mp£A Awpearance:. Shri C.J,K..Rao, counsel for the petitioiiers. Smt Smita Ghai, P.L. for fhe State. ORAL.ORDE.R (05.08.2011) Counsel. for tlie petitioners siibm.it th.at tlie issu.e relatia-g. to claim. of con.tra.ctual payment.to Cook an.d other era.ployees cam.e up for consideration before this Court in W.P.(S) No. 2004/11 and W.P. (S) No. 5772/ 10 arid buxich. ofofber petitions 8B,d after exa.miam.g th.e claim. of the petitioners, this Court had directed consideratioxi of the case in those cases. He submits that fhe case of the petitioners is covered by the aforesaid order and th.erefore directioB.. be issued. . for deciding fhe representatioii of the petitioners also, Counsel for tbe State subinits that tlie representations of the petitioiiers wo'sild be decided after due veriiication iB. accorda:ace wi.th, law. After gomg through fhe order dated 15.4,2011 passed m W.P.(S) No. 2004/11 aad orier dated 29.6.2011 passed m W.P. (S) No< 5772/ 10, it appears that fhe case ofthe petitio.iie.rs is covered by the afbresaid orders. Therefore, fhe petitioners are also entitled to the sam.e dir'ection in the case. Accordingly, it is dirkected fhat .if the petitioners make fresh representalioii before the conceraed a-uthorily, claim.m.g payment of "'..A. '^ I 1 ^ m.:mnBiim wages applicable to a contract employee un.der the Chhattisgarh Civil. Sen?ice (Contract Apponitment) Rules, 2004, the sarne shaU be disposed of ia accordaxice with law, wifhm. a period of eight weeks froxsi the date of subniission. of rcpreBeDtB.tiou. In the event of any adverse order, fhe petitioners woii.id be a.t Ube-rty to fil.e petition afresh. With the .aforesald direction, the petition staiids disposed of. It is niade c.1ear that this Court has aot expressed any opinioa on, lii.e m.erits of the case. and tlie autliority coB.cero.ed woilld be at •Uberty to decide the representa.tion stri.ctly in a.ccordaiice with law, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge