IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION (LODG) NO. 405 OF 2006 PETITION (LODG) NO. 405 OF 2006 PETITION (LODG) NO. 405 OF 2006 M/s. Chunilal Gupta & Sons. ] .. Petitioners Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ] .. Respondents Mr. Pratik Saxeria with Mr. I.J. Nankani i/b Nankani & Associates for the petitioners. Mr. Milind Sathe, senior Advocate with Mr. H. Bhave i/b Bhave & Co. for the respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 09TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . There is an Arbitral Clause being Clause No.67 of the Agreement. The Dealership Agreement has been terminated. It is open to the petitioner to invoke the said arbitration clause. Once that be the case, no case for interference. 2. Writ Petition disposed of accordingly. 3. In the meantime, the structure not to be demolished for a period of two weeks from today. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- : 2 : [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]