»• SIHSi.F WWff (L^- '2^-s7 l' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( C ) No. *^' Of 2010 PETITIONERS: RESPONDENT8: 1. Sheikh Ahmed S/o Sheikh Jee, aged about 31 years, by caste Musalman, ' R/o ViUage Sendras, P.S. Malkharoda, Disfa-ict Janjgir Chainpa (CG). 2. Smt. Rajeshwari Singh Judeo W/o Sheikh Ahmed D/o Gopal Singh Judeo, aged about 25 years, R/o Village Sendras, P.S. Malkharoda, District Janjgu- Cham.pa (CG). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Hoine Departaient, Manb-alay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director General ofPolice , Chhattisgarh, P.H.Q. Raipur (CG). 3. The Superintendent of Police, Raigarh (CG). 4 The Superintendent of Police, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Kharsiya, District Raigarh (CG). 6. Shri Gopal Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Judeo, aged about 55 years. 7. Nageshwar Singh S/o Gopal Singh, aged about 20 years. ./ •/ 8. 9. Digvijay Singh S/o Gopal Singh, aged about 18 years. Shri Bhagwan Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Judeo, aged about 58 years. 10. Shri Rupesh Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, aged about 32 years. 11. Shri Kamlesh Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, aged about 35 years. 12. Shri Rajesh Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, aged aboutSO years. (Respondents No. 6 to 12 all resident of Village Khersuja, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA li:C-";~. tII(3^E0I3i^OSI B®BI:§^AgB8<ia^@» .iS'^.WKiSBEiiiBi^KKJMfflS^^liMU PETITIONERS : Sfaeikh Ahmed fe another. •l'VERSUS:::.. ' . : -. :.'/ , ^:.,:^RESE©,l®E]m'&'..:ll;State^ofCUh^sgaite-&/OtBe .'.-1^ M®ITPBT'tTKSiN t]N@ AKB@LE<2l6^ja'E®?G©NSaTt^ •••.:: SB;:r;H6n*t^affiajtisBIK£:at^Iiati^:J.'j.^k^.'!'^^ .':®^-;'3i:w'::';;KS:2!;^'^R'>S;'":?'£s[c%:;fr^^ : '":ll:;''?1 :Present;:: ; "•SM-Shaile|ilt%aM,|^,gSg^Gat^ :'Slm:MJ^|Bi]|jfi^|3isSN%'M!rWMi^si^ c ^|R.Mp(^^||NQa^J^||.|ggg;|||||||ai|\||;^|.il,':^ ^^Sfigi||||ijU^||nM|a|jo|S8i|l^{|§l|^aE|Sii^ ::.. :,'?s'^xitrgs^ait|^s^gMiK; |H^^®^ •:;,'..:! r,-;..':'.< ;':€4^':';ii(iR3i@KWK^i^<!^.!i'':r'^ <I^ed\cm't3W^WAugus^2Q10) ^ 1. TOewntpetitionerSGlamitobemamedGcaiple^^i^ Speeial ManiageAct,^954; -A/copy Q tHe ce^ beenfiledafcArineXiiTe^P/1.1^ ';. .'.. •'1 .. 1:: ;;;: -;.:: .. ;":; .; '" ,,.1 -II 2. .'.tj' ii-:l: flli It is mfoimed, at the bar, that^^^^^ffi ^"iWs^'.'fW Iodged.<^by^M(^atSinghJudeOi;f^^ I'olice: Station KKarsiya,.E)^iGtCRaiga^ PoIice^Station]\tel alo^]3isfftet^aBJgir- ^ •petitionerNo.lnatRely^ShBil^jBter::''^'''^ .;i-^^;-^;^:M}'.-r'.1S{ ^Tlnis,^m'tKe;interest:i|^ji^c^,.')ltie\RSg^^ %I^^Syil®%lilE^sKKii^H^IIK8*i| .::";^^.'fl'l:.;^s:S;:M::^:^® fdsect^^fee^'f6wSs^^riWKiff£Ss/s^et^^ •Ax 6i3ii^ly,^tfle'^R^s|[^;C}eD.6ral'ffl^ :WSK:.i&S^^:^^^t 'petitioners.^lBthesfateiment,i ^ :.lias:l^eppsed,:lhat:;^eslias'^0[ttelsBtmf^^fflMi^ .^etitic)neT'^;^Z,<:m'.222®0^!0;:Before|^ •'il%:S'%^!yi'?l'%sii! ^esfBengal, an4acetifieate1:OtMseSect^^be^i^^as;J2^^ Wl, with^e'petition.fCTliepetitipner^N^ . 1,^; ttSw •n L\ Sv W •^,-'''./' "(i: la? ' ' ''ie-i.M Judeo has also deposed in her statement recorded before the Registrar General of this High Court that she had entered into matrimonial alliance on 22.7.2010 with the petitioner No. 1, and both ofthem are living together happily, as husband and wife. The aforesaid statements so recorded are taken as a part ofthe record of this case. In view offhe statements deposed by the petitioners, the respondent No. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 are directed not to interfere with their matrimonial life and not to harass, humiliate or use force causing danger to the life and personal liberty of the petitioners, who are major and living as liusband and wife. In the event, a complaint is made by the petitioners before the police authorities, the police authorities shall ensure that appropriate protection is provided to the petitioners. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this petition is disposed of. A copy ofthe statement ofthe petitioners recorded before the Registrar General of this Court is annexed herewith as a part of this order, for necessary action by the police authorities in the pending missing reports filed by the respective fathers ofthe petitioners before the police station Kharsiya, District Raigarh and Police Station Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa. Certified copy, today alongwith the statement ofthe petitioners recorded before the Registrar General. g^jy. ~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit