^^Sf^ :;.^-^ ^CjM^- vs'^.^''"'^ 15.. BB ^%^:^- B^f ^illS' Sl!^: 111) THE HON'BLE HI&H COURTOF JI/&ICATUREAT BILASPUR ^^^:h::...' IBK^'-.' •B^:''-: BK;: ^.- 1S;^ [C.&:. WRITPETrTEON fS ) NO.r5<A'^ OF 2010 BH!: 8:!SS'; KIE; ft.tt· !<&•'!'•:• BiiETIQNER :Chhotu Ekka S/o. Shriftuctan Ekka. aged abput 46 Years, Occupation - Service, Posted as Upper Division TeaGher at Adivasi Balak Ashram Batwahi, Vikash Khand Lundro, Distt.- Sarguja (C.6.) iSffi-^._"?';:._ iaARESPON&ENTS KK M- VERSUS 1. TheS+dteofChhcrt"l'i5garh,through theSecretacy Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhdwan Raipur (C.6.) £ The Cominissioner Tribal welfare Department Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.6.) UF .-;T; ffii 3; Additional Commissioner Tribal welfare Ambikapur.Distt.- Sarguja (C.&) 4. Coltectop Sarguja; Distt'.- Sargiya - {C^ „ . ':•, , " •:•.::•.:•• 5. Project Officer Ekikrit Tribal Development Project Ambikapur, Djstt.- Sarguja (G.G.) WRITPETITEON UNDER ARTECLES 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA FDR ISSUEANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. 3~sr '^ww<i, ®t?ly<i<s,fsldiy^'i. ........]^..Q.}:....l-.!d.2.1.!l£. 200 STI^I 'TSRT ('ijqf^SI^iE;) 311^1 W VW* .TOrantnwiN; Praffeea. TCIIW^fel 3)1^1 [SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra B 28.6.2011 Shri Surul Sahu, counsel fbr the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lfawyer for the State. Leamed counsel for the r as suspension allowance is cor suspension allowance as p departmental enqi.ury was dire< of 3 months vide order dated the Collector, but so far, enqutr^ Leamed counsel for the Officer has alreldy been appj passed by fhe CoUector. Considering the submis^ the parties and that the Collect of enquuy within a period of ^ (Annexure R-2), it woiild be against the petitioner be expe): delay. Wifh ftie aforesaid obi ^raferatT •mii?if •?-fs^tTra^re '^aiRpTan^r ;ohan Shri'vastava, J.l ^^ [spondent-State submits that as far ;emed, fhe petitioner is being pald tr rules. He submits that the fted to be conciuded wifhin a peripd i.5.2010 (Annexure R-2J passedbv has not been concluded. ^etitioner subniits fhat the Inquiry )tnted vide order dated 5.5.2010 ions made by leamed counsel for tor had ah-eady ordered conclusion monfhs vide order dated 5.5.2010 proper to direct that the enquiry litiouslv concluded without undue ;rvations, the petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- " . Manindra Mohan Shrwastavai Judge