IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 94 of 2009 Shri Nafeez Ahmed ……….Revisionist Versus Smt. Shehnaaz Kahtoon .…...Respondent Criminal Revision No. 95 of 2009 Shri Nafeez Ahmed ……….Revisionist Versus Smt. Shehnaaz Kahtoon .…...Respondent Criminal Revision No. 96 of 2009 Shri Nafeez Ahmed ……….Revisionist Versus Smt. Shehnaaz Kahtoon .…...Respondent Present: Mr. A Rab, Advocate for the revisionist. None for the respondent. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard learned counsel for the revisionist. All these three revisions arise out of orders passed on different dates on an application moved by the respondent before the Family Court under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The principal contention of the learned counsel for the revisionist is that the orders have been passed by the family court without hearing the present revisionist. As an interim order dated 20.08.2010 of this Court the revisionist was directed to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- with the respondent Smt. Shehnaaz Khatoon. A statement has been made at the bar by the learned counsel for the revisionist that this amount has been deposited on 4.9.2010 and the interim order passed by this Court has been complied with. The respondent has not put in appearance inspite of service. However, in the interest of justice no useful purpose will be served if the present revisions remain pending before this Court. Therefore, the present revisions are disposed of with the following directions:- The revisionist shall be present before the Family Court on 4.10.2010. The Family Court will hear the revisionist as well as respondent after giving due notice to the parties and pass appropriate orders. It is directed that the revisionist shall continue to pay his wife a sum of Rs.2500/- per month although it is clarified that this is only by way of interim measure subject to the final decision taken by the Family Court. Till the decision reached by the Family Court the recovery of accumulated arrears shall remain stayed. With the aforesaid observations, all the present criminal revisions are disposed of. No order as to costs. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned for necessary compliance. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J) 16.09.2010 Kuldeep