IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4875/2008 Mr.Namdeo Sitaram Parab Petitioner Vs. Mr.Vilas Dhondu Bidye & ors. Respondents Shri.M.S.Karnik ,advocate for the petitioner Coram : A.M.Khanwilkar,J. Date : 10th July,2008 P.C. 1] Heard counsel for the petitioner. No interference is warranted in exercise of writ jurisdiction against concurrent finding of the Courts below which has taken in to account the changed circumstance that the sons of the landlord have now grown up .The requirement is not only for the respondent himself but also for the family members such as his grown up sons. The Courts below have considered all these aspects. Some error here or there cannot be the basis to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction . Hence the petition is dismissed. 2] At this stage counsel for the petitioner seeks time to vacate 2 the premises up to one year . The respondent is not before the Court. Besides ,the requirement pressed in to service by the respondent is for bonafide requirement .The respondent /plaintiff has waited for decree since 20-9-1995 . By way of indulgence the petitioner is granted three months time to vacate the suit premises subject to filing an usual undertaking within two weeks from today , failing which the respondent will be free to execute the decree in accordance with law. It is made clear that if this indulgence shown to the petitioner is not acceptable to the Respondent ,it will be open to the Respondent / landlord to apply for recall of order granting time to vacate the premises. (A.M.Khanwilkar,J.)