CRM No. M 10873 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 10873 of 2010 Date of decision: 28.05.2010 Gurbinder Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is brought to the notice of the Court by Mr. K S Pannu, learned DAG, Punjab, on instructions that the then Sarpanch of the Village is the brother of the present petitioner. Even the attesting witness, namely, Kanwaljit Singh is the real brother of the petitioner and the second attesting witness, namely, Chanan Singh son of Tara Singh is his tenant. The land purchased by the petitioner is the ownership of jumla mustarka malkans. Moreover, the said land is stated to have been purchased from one Joginder CRM No. M 10873 of 2010 2 Singh son of Swaran Singh, resident of Village Sachander. In fact, the said Joginder Singh does not exist. It is stated that he is member of the land mafia who have tried to buy off the prime land belonging to the Government by entering into sale deed with the fictitious owners in conspiring with each other. The matter requires custodial interrogation. Moreover, Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Sewa Singh, states that the petitioner has not even joined the investigation in pursuance to the order dated 09.04.2010. Accordingly, the concession of bail cannot be extended to the petitioner. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 28.05.2010 mohan