1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 422 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax, - I, Kolhapur.. ... .... .... Appellant. Versus Shree Tatyasaheb Kore Warana Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ... .... .... .... Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C.: It is submitted across the Bar that the questions (a), (b) and (d) as framed in this appeal are covered by the judgment reported in 301 ITR pg.191 (Bombay) against the Department. Questions (c), (e) and (f) as framed in the appeal are not the questions raising any substantial question of law but are merely questions of facts. As such the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)