IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 117 of 2009 Naresh Kumar .……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .………. Respondents. Mr. K.S. Bora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Date of decision: 09-04-2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) In furtherance of the directions issued by this Court on 09.02.2010, two separate compliance affidavits have been filed, one at the hands of respondent No. 3 and the other at the hands of respondent No. 4. In view of the aforestated compliance affidavits, learned counsel for the petitioner states, that all the encroachments have been removed and the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. The undertaking given by the respondents in the affidavits to ensure, that encroachments are not made in the future, shall be complied with in letter as well as in spirit for the future. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 09.04.2010 09.04.2010 Amit