IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.2263 of 2007. Date of decision: 12.03.2010. State of H.P. & Another …Petitioners Versus Shri Ram Lal …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr.P.K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General with Mr.P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. For the Respondent: Mr.P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud,J. When this petition was taken up for hearing learned Additional Advocate General drew our attention to Office Order No.PW-CE-Elect.Apptt.(DW)/2007-2008- 7009-15, dated 20.3.2008, which is placed on record of the case. He submits that the service of the respondent has been regularized as Electrician Grade- II retrospectively from 1.1.2000. We have considered this order. The writ petition does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? Yes. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that this order provides a fresh cause of action to the respondent as he is entitled to benefit of regularization against a higher post from a date prior to 1.1.2000. We are not adjudicating on this claim of the respondent. If he so aggrieved by this order, he may challenge it in accordance with law, if so permissible. It would also be open to the State in such proceedings to urge that the order of the Tribunal which has been passed granting a work charged status as Electrician Grade-I is not in accordance with law. This petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. All interim orders are vacated. All miscellaneous applications are disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud) Judge. March 12, 2010 (Kuldip Singh) (aks) Judge.