IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4044 of 2003 Between: Smt. K.Poornamam W/o.Prasad Rao, H.No.26/81,Third Cross Road, Z.P.Colony, Nellore-4. ..... Petitioner AND 1 The Commissioner. A.P.Vaidya Vidhana Parishad, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. 2 The Dist. Coordinator, Hospital Services A.P.Vaidya Vidhana Parishad, C/o.Dist. Headquarters Hospital, Dargamitta, Nellore. 3 The Medical Superintendent, C/o.Dist. Headquarters Hospital, Dargamitta, Nellore. 4 The Medical Superintendent, WFTB 7 CD Hospital, Dargamitta, Nellore. 5 Medical Superintendent, Government Maternity Hospital, Nellore-3. …..Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 4044 OF 2003 ORDER: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has questioned the proceedings in the letter Rc.No.4742/HEC-B/2003, dated 1-2-2003 issued by the Commissioner, AP Vaidya Vidhana Parishad, first respondent herein. In the said proceedings, certain guidelines were indicated to the contractors who are supplying diet to the inpatients of the Government Hospitals. It was the case of the petitioner, that she is supplying diet as per the guidelines issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No. 539, HM&FW (M) Department, dated 8-11-1993, but, however, in the proceedings dated 1-2-2003, the first respondent has issued certain further guidelines, which did not exist in G.O.Ms.No. 539, dated 8-11-1993. However, it is to be seen, those guidelines were issued for the financial year 2003-2004. It is stated that subsequently the Government has issued comprehensive guidelines referring the representations from the contractors association, and, issued G.O.Ms.No. 32, HM&FW(M1) dated 2-2-2005. Consequent to the same, the petitioner was also issued orders dated 10-03-2005 for further continuation, from 01-04-2005 to 31-03-2006. As much as ensuing guidelines were issued in G.O.Ms.No. 32, dated 02-02-2005, and, the petitioner was already issued orders for further continuation from 1-4-2005 to 31-3-2006, I dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondents to continue the petitioner in terms of the orders dated 10-3-2005. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ------------------------------------ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY DATED: 23-11-2005. Msnr.