:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2343 OF 1995 Santaji Siddu Vadd .. Petitioner. Vs. Herle Shikshan Mandal & Ors. .. Respondents. None for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. ORAL ORDER: ORAL ORDER: ORAL ORDER: . In this writ petition the petitioner has impugned the following order: . "Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. It is prayed that the Election Officer be restrained from enrolling the members of the Respondent No.1 pending hearing and final disposal of this appeal. . There is no urgency in passing the interim relief. This court is doubtful whether such type of injunction can be granted or not. By enrolling the members no substantive loss is likely to be caused to the appellant. Hence the order. ORDER . Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 5/6/1995." 2. This court on 19th February, 1996, while admitting the petition, had passed the following order: . "Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. :2: :2: :2: . On the careful consideration of the impugned order in particular the permission to the Election Officer to enrol members, who will have a right to vote, I think that the matter requires scrutiny. In view of the order this matter has to be admitted. . Rule, returnable on 9.4.1996. All respondents (except Respondent No.1) waive service. . In the interim respondent no.2 is directed not to enrol members and hold the elections. Addl. District Judge, Kolhapur to expedite the hearing of the appeal." 3. From the very nature of the order, impugned in the petition, so also the interim order passed by this court at the stage of admission of the petition, the parties appear to have lost interest in the petition, and hence none is present for the parties. The petition is pending since last about twelve years. In the circumstances the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Rule is discharged. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)