IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11855 of 2010 AWADHESH KUMAR SINGH, S/O LATE SRI BIKRAMADITYA SINGH, R/O RAMDEV NAGAR MAHDEVA, SOUTH V.M.H. SCHOOL CAMPUS, P.O. AND P.S. AND DISTT.- SIWAN. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, DISTT.- CHAPRA. 4. THE REGISTRAR, JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, DISTT.- CHAPRA. 5. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, JAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA, DISTT.- SARAN AT CHAPRA. 6. BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE REGISTRAR, BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR. 8. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, BABA SAHEB BHEEM RAO AMBEDKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as well as Mr Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel appearing for the J.P. University and Mr Ajay Bihari Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the B.R.A. Bihar University. The petitioner retired in February, 2005 from the post of Reader, Department of History from Bhola Prasad Singh College, Bhore, Siwan. His grievance is that the pensionary benefits have not been revised pursuant to the implementation of the salary on U.G.C. pay scale besides the merger of 50% D.A. with pension. Learned counsel appearing for both the respondent- Universities submits that the representation of the petitioner is not 2 clear with regard to the outstanding claims. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file separate representation before the Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra (respondent no.4) and the Registrar, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.7) with regard to the respective grievances. In case such separate representations are filed with regard to the respective claims stating distinctly the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the representations of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is not being paid, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)