IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.19903 of 2009 Between: Mummareddy Venkata Subba Reddy and others ..... PETITIONERS AND The Special Collector, Telugu Ganga Project, Nellore, SPSR Nellore district and another .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: This court issued rule nisi on 24-09-2009. 2. The writ petition is filed praying for the relief of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in to showing the names of the petitioners in the notifications issued under Land Acquisition Act as pattadars of the land covered by S.No.1 and not issuing notice to the petitioners and not considering the objections of the petitioners as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to issue notices to the petitioners and consider the objections of the petitioners and pay compensation to the petitioners to the extent of the land acquired and pass such other suitable order. 3. It is stated that the predecessors in-title of the petitioners had acquired the entire land in Sy.No.1 of Oduru village, Nellore District admeasuring Ac.452-30 guntas through registered sale deeds. 4. It is also stated that the Joint Collector, Nellore cancelled the pattedar pass books of the petitioners land and others by an order dated 03-01-2008 by initiating Suo motu proceedings under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattedar Pass Books Act. On 02-09- 2009 the first respondent published the notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act in Vartha daily newspaper proposing to acquire an extent of Ac.5-00 guntas in Sy.No.1/2 of Oduru Village for the purpose of formation of Telugu Ganga Cannel. 5. Several other facts also had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the non-consideration of objections filed by the petitioners. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing the respondents to consider the objections, if any, filed by the petitioners in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in this regard. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J October 12, 2009. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.19903 of 2009 October 12, 2009