IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 18226 of 2004 Between: S. Bala Goud, S/o. Malla Goud, R/o. Waddepalli Village Mandal, Varni Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad. 2. Superintendent of Prohibition & Excise Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any other direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the claim of the petitioners by Proc.No.E3/2721/2000 Dt. 21-10-2003 is illegal, arbitrary against to the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in 2002(6)ALT 288 and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent to issue T.F.T. Licence to the petitioner forthwith in respect of Waddepalli Village, Mandal, Varni, Nizamabad District. Counsel for the Petitioner:VADDEMANI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: Against the order impugned, an efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner by way of an appeal under Section 63 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968. Accordingly granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to workout the remedy under the statute, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________ 25.10.2004 sh To 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad. 2. The Superintendent of Prohibition & Excise Nizamabad. 3. 2CCs to the G.P. for Prohibition and Excise, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 4. 2CD copies.