IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18654 of 2010 MUNI LAL MANDAL . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 06/ 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute between the relative of a co-accused and the informant. He further submits that some of the accused persons have been enlarged on bail which is mentioned in paragraph-12 of the petition. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 11.11.2009. The learned court below by its order dated 25.03.2010 has stated that paragraph-2 of the case diary contains dying declaration of the deceased against the petitioner, but learned counsel for the parties after perusing the case diary have found that there is no dying declaration of the deceased before the police. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let the petitioner, namely Muni Lal Mandal be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No.- 47 of 2009. Ranjan (S. N Hussain, J.)