IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 25TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 27552 of 2008(E) PETITIONER: --------------------- SANDHYA V.M, D/O MURUGANANDAN, AGED 24 YEARS, VANDIPARABIL HOUSE, INDIVARAM, PAMPOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SRI.N.A.SHAFEEK RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM, REP. BY REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLOR OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM P.O.,MALAPPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).27552 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner appeared for the IVth Semester M.Sc (Mathematics) Examination conducted in May, 2008. She did not secure the required marks for two of the subjects. She sought for revaluation. The result of the revaluation has not been declared so far. Hence this writ petition. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.C.A.Chacko and Sri.P.C.Sasidharan for the University. It is only appropriate that the University publishes the result at the earliest. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the result of the revaluation of the papers sought for by the petitioner, at least, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/- //true copy// P.S. To Judge