IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4447 of 2008 Decided on: 18.08.2010 Hari Saran Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No. 1. None for respondents No. 2 to 5. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 18, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?