HIGH COURT GF JyQLCATJJRE QH"H"ATTL$GA"RH: BILASEUR SINGLE BENGH : HON’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, CJ Writ Petition No. 908 of 1998 Present: Shri P. Diwakar, learned Sr. Advocate with Shri Adil Minhaj, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, learned GA. for the State/ respondents 1 to 3. Shri VR. Tiwari, learned counsel or respondent No.4. f ORAL ORDER {Passed on 22"a June, 2006) The points that arise for decision are substantially similar to those that arose for decision in WP. No.910 of 98, disposed of by me, by a 19 separate order today, except the details of the land, notice, proceedings PETITMNERS 1. Chitki s/o Bundram aged about 55 years 2. Shital Prasad s/o Bundram aged about 45 years 3. Jagdev slo Bundram aged about 43 years All are by Caste Aghariya, resident of ViNage Lailunga, Tahsi! Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh‘ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1‘ State of MP. through Secretary, Revenue Department Valtabh Bhawan, BhopaL 2. The Collector, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh,~ MP. 3. The Sub Divisienal Officer (Civil), Gharghode, Dist. Raigarh, MP. 4. Dev Pratap Singh s/o Gopal Singh, By Caste Raj Gond, Junadihi Viilage Lailunga Tah. Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh. g ,l’ etc. ln tha View of the matter, l dismiss the writ petition with no order as to costs. The 3rd respondent-Sub Divisional Officer is directed t0 consider the reply already filed by the petitionera if any, give the parties fair opportunity to submit their respective case and appreciate the evidence produced by them and pass appropriate order, in accordance with iaw, at an early date. lt is, however, directed that the status-qua that obtains as on today with regard to possession of the subject property shall be maintained till the 3m respondent disposes of the proceedings. After receipt of a copy of this order, before taking any further step and . conducting any hearing. the 3'd respondent shall issue notice of hearing to r the parties. Sdl- ' Chief Justice t