IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 834 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.8.2010 Haryana State Radiographers’ Association .....Petitioner Versus Smt. Navraj Sandhu and another …. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri H.S. Sawhney, Sr. Advocate, with Shri Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Aman Chaudhary, Addl. AG, Haryana. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) In pursuance of the directions of this Court, the respondents have passed an order on 23.7.2010 declining the representation submitted by the petitioner. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present petition. Hence, the same is dismissed. Rule is discharged. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to seek its remedy against the order passed in appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 19.8.2010 ds