COCP No.2304 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No.2304 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 28, 2011 Baldev Singh .......Petitioner Versus Rajan Parminder and others .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Vivek K.Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. <><><> AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) In this petition, the prayer has been made for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents for disobeying the judgment and decree dated 6.9.2011 passed by the trial Court. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that the respondents are violating the decree of the Civil Court. Admittedly, the petitioner has a remedy under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure for execution of the decree for injunction. Order XXI Rule 32, sub-rule (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under:- “32. Decree for specific performance for restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction - (1) Where the party against whom a decree for the specific performance of a contract, or for restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction, has been passed, has had an opportunity of obeying COCP No.2304 of 2011 2 the decree and has wilfully failed to obey it, the decree may be enforced (in the case of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights by the attachment of his property or, in the case of a decree for the specific performance of a contract or for an injunction) by his detention in the civil prison, or by the attachment of his property, or by both.” In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of by relegating the petitioner to avail remedy of execution available to him under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure in accordance with law. ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) September 28, 2011 JUDGE SRM