IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14244 of 2010 1. Chandri Devi @ Chandrakala Devi, wife of Ramjee Mahto. 2. Shyam Narayan Mahto, son of Ramjee Mahto. 3. Kaushliya Devi @ Sushila Devi, wife of Shyam Narayan Mahto. 4. Arun Kumar Mahto, son of Ramjee Mahto. 5. Alka Devi, wife of Arun Kumar Mahto. All resident of Village- Chhateshwar, P.S.Warisnagar, District-Samastipur. ……………………………Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………………Opposite Party. For the petitioners :- Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. A. M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 19. 05. 2010. Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners are in-laws of the complainant. Though there is allegation of demand of dowry and torture against all the accused persons including the petitioners, but primal role for committing the crime in question is against co- accused Mithilesh Kumar, the husband of the complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that husband of the complainant had earlier filed a matrimonial suit for restitution of his conjugal rights, which has been decreed in his favour by order dated 18. 04. 2009, vide Annexure-3. Be that as it may, in the facts of the case and in view of relationship of the petitioners with the complainant, they being her in-laws, in the event of their arrest/surrender in the court below in connection with T.R. No. 1448/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 260/2008, within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond 2 of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Samastipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)