IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C VIL APPLICATION NO200 OF 2007 C VIL APPLICATION NO200 OF 2007 C VIL APPLICATION NO200 OF 2007 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO.280 of 1997. SECOND APPEAL NO.280 of 1997. SECOND APPEAL NO.280 of 1997. Janardhan Sarpatil since deceased through heir Shantabai Janardhan Sarpatil ..Applicant versus Balu Hari Sarpatil & Others ..Respondents Mr.V.M. Parshuramani for the Applicant Mr.R.S.Khandeparkar for the Respondent Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 15th February, 2007 Dated : 15th February, 2007 Dated : 15th February, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. 2. This matter was in fact fully heard and fixed for pronouncement of judgment. It is at that stage the learned Advocate for the appellant pointed out that the original appellant has expired and as such it is necessary to bring his heirs on record. Accordingly, the present application has been made. As there is delay of 236 days in filing the present application, applicants have prayed for delay condonation. 3. The learned Advocate for the respondent submits that there is no justifiable cause to -2- condone the delay. However, for the reasons mentioned in the application, I think that there is justifiable ground to condone the delay. Hence delay condoned. The heirs of original appellant Janardhan Narayan Sarpatil be brought on record. Necessary amendment to be carried out on or before 21.2.2007. 4. C.A.disposed of accordingly. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)