IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 1280 of 2008 Between: Satti Nagireddy, S/o Sattireddy, R/o Door No.170/1, 3rd Ward, Ravulapalem, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Panchayat Division) East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 Goluguri Venkata Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy @ Musalaiah, Ravulapalem, E.G.District. 4 B.Bhaskara Rao, s/o not known to the petitioner Ravulapalem, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction specially onein thenature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not initiating action against the 3rd and 4th respondents pursuant to the report submitted by Divisional Panchayat Officer, Amalapuram with regard the misappropriation of funds by 3rd and 4th respondents in laying roads and cutting of trees in Ravulapalem Village, East Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the A.P.panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and consequently, direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to initiate action against the 3rd and 4th respondents and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA W.P.NO. 1280 OF 2008 ORDER: (Per Anil R. Dave, HCJ) The short grievance which has been ventilated in this writ petition is with regard to non-consideration of a representation dt. 5.1.2008 made by the petitioner to respondent No.1. Without going into the merits and looking to the facts of the case, we direct that respondent No.1 shall take a final decision on the representation dt. 5.1.2008 within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order by him. In view of the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ ANIL R. DAVE CJ _____​______________________ GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA J Dt.29.2.2008 NB CC of order be furnished within two days. /BO/ KR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector (Panchayat Division) East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3. 2 CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development 4. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}