IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2009 / 28TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23676 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ 1. AJIMON K.S, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.SUGUNAN, KARIMPANTHARA NIKARTH, PATTANAKKADU PO, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. 2. REJIMON K.S, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. SUGUNAN,KARIMPANTHARA NIKARTH, PATTANAKKADU PO, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. 3. BIJUMON K.S, AGED 34 YEARS,S/O.SUGUNAN KARIMPANTHARA NIKARTH, PATTANAKKADU PO, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM SRI.D.B.BINU SRI.C.N.GOPAKUMAR SRI.ANI JOSEPH K.A RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE GRIEVANCES OFFICER,(UNDER AGRICULTUR AL DEBT WAIVER & DEBT RELIEF SCHEME, 2008) DISTRICT CO-OP.BANK LTD, ALAPPUZHA. 2. VETTAKKAL SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD, NO.1812, VETTAKKAL PO, CHERTHALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 23676 OF 2009 (D) ===================== Dated this the 19th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that they had availed of loans from the 2nd respondent, which ought to have been waived in view of the provisions contained under the Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008. However, it is stated that the benefit was declined for the reason that the loan was renewed in the meanwhile, as a result of which, they were rendered ineligible for waiver. The contention raised by the petitioners is that loans were in default and that they had not applied for any renewal. It is stated that urging this complaint, they have filed Exts.P1(a), (b) and (c) before the 1st respondent and that the said representations have still not been considered. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the above and taking into account the pendency of Exts.P1(a), (b) and (c) before the 1st respondent, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P1(a), (b) and (c) with notice to the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of WPC 23676/09 :2 : production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp