IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 751 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 751 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 751 OF 2006 Ajay Kumar Krishnadeo Tiwari. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Girish Desai with Mr. Amit Shastri for the petitioner. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for the respondents No.1 and 4. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for the respondent No.2. Mr. S.G. Surana for the respondent No.6. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 05TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . By order dated 12th August, 2005, respondent No.3 i.e. the Slum Redevelopment Authority (SRA) and order dated 5th January, 2006, passed by respondent No.4 Additional Collector for Slum Rehabilitation Authority, petitioner has been declared ineligible to claim the benefit of Slum Rehabilitation Project on Plot Nos.108 and 109, Sant Janabai Marg, Mori Tabela No.2, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai. Therefore, the present Petition. The main ground of challenge to the orders are that they are : 2 : not reasoned. There is no dispute on that count. 2. In Writ Petition No.18 of 2006 by an order dated 24th January, 2006, and in another Writ Petition (Lodg.) No.64 of 2006, by an order dated 8th March,2006, this Court has considered the cases of similarly situated slum dwellers. 3. In view of this, we are of the view that respondent No.3 SRA should give fresh hearing to the petitioners and pass reasoned order after taking into consideration all relevant documetns which will be produced by the parties and adjudicate their rights accordingly as expeditiously as possible and within three months from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Parties are directed to appear before the respondent No.3-SRA within two weeks for fixing the date of hearing. 5. The ad-interim relief granted by an order dated 27th January, 2006, shall continue till the above directed order is passed by respondent No.3. Needless to mention that the relief is restricted only to the petitioners. : 3 : 7. In view of this, Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]