1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A. NO. 8189/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 732/2008 The State of Mah and others vs. Smt. Saraswatibai Haribhau Gomase - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- . CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 3 rd MARCH , 2009 Heard Shri S.S.Deshpande, Advocate, for the petitioners and Shri J.L.Bhoot, Advocate, for Respondent/applicant. Ad-interim stay was granted by this Court on 05.03.2008. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent/applicant that it was granted without hearing the respondent and the petitioners have failed to make out prima facie case for getting stay. I have considered the submissions of the parties. On perusal of the complaint preferred by the complainant and also evidence, prima facie there appears no specific statement that the 2 respondent has completed 240 days service in each year for 5 years preceding to that G.R. In these circumstances, the vacating of stay in a way would result in the factual dismissal of the petition, which is not permissible at this stage. Accordingly, this application is rejected, however, as the respondent submits that she is on the verge of retirement, the hearing of the petition is expedited. List the petition for final hearing on 25th March, 2009. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit