IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 16TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3792 of 2009(B) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- MOIDEENKUTTY K, S/O. LATE HASSANKUTTY, KATTIL HOUSE, ALPATTAKULAMBU PADINJAREKKARA, P.O. KODUR, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY MR.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. KOYAKUTTY, S/O. LATE KUNJUNNI, VADAKKATHRA HOUSE, ALAPATTAKULAMBU PADINJAREKKARA, P.O. KODUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE KODUR GRMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O. KODUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB IDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DIST. MS. N. SUDHA DEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.3792 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Exts.P1 to P3 are the applications made by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent invoking his powers under Sections 133, 139 & 142 of the Cr.PC respectively. Delay in passing orders on the applications is what is complained of in this writ petition. 2. Having regard to the above complaint, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P1 to P3 applications as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Orders as directed above shall be passed only with notice to respondents 1 & 2 also. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg