IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-5157 of 2010 Date of Decision:1.4.2010 Inderjit Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Bikramjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Chautala, A.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail has been vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the complainant on the ground that the petitioner inflicted as many as four injuries and one of the injury is grievous in nature. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the injury, which is grievous, is on the non vital part i.e. between the finger and thumb and other injures are simple in nature. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Jasbir Singh states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation and weapon has also been recovered. In view of the facts mentioned above, order dated 22.2.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed accordingly. 1.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE