WP(C) 2696/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner superannuated on 30.11.2008 from the post of Senior Administrativ e Assistant in the Secretariat Administration (Establishment) Department. On the eve of his retirement, a show-cause-notice for drawing up disciplinary proceedi ng was issued to him on 18.3.2008 (Annexure-4) and thereafter the disciplinary e nquiry was started. The petitioner is aggrieved by non-receipt of his pensionary dues because of the pendency of the disciplinary proceeding. But while the case remained pending, the Inquiry Officer gave a report on 30.9.2 011 exonerating the petitioner from all the charges. Mr. B.J. Talukdar, the Addl . Sr. Government Advocate submit that exoneration report of the Inquiry Officer was accepted by the Disciplinary Authority on 3.12.2011. A copy of the relevant order is produced by Mr. Talukdar, for perusal of the Court. I find that the Disciplinary Authority has recorded that since the inquiry proce eding could not establish the charge against the delinquent, he is exonerated an d he was permitted to draw the retirement benefits. The period of suspension is ordered to be treated to be as on duty, for all purpose. Considering the above developments, this case is disposed of by directing the re spondents to expedite the implementation of the order of 3.12.2011 of the Admini strative Authority. As the petitioner had retired on 30.11.2008, the process be expedited and be completed preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order to enable the petitioner to receive his pensionary and other service benefits. The petitioner will apprise the respondents accordingly. A copy of the order dated 3.12.2011 be kept in the case records.