1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Family Court Appeal No.94 of 2008 Gevan Florence Hoogewerf Abreu Appellant Vs. O.K.Augusty Respondent Ms.Sumangala & Ms.Veena Gowda for appellant. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. July 7, 2008 P.C. . We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant - wife and we have perused the impugned order dated 31/12/2007 passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court No.6 at Mumbai. By the said order the mother is allowed to retain the custody of the child by name Alison. Alison is a daughter aged about 16 years and the father has been allowed to meet her once in a week but only after March 2008. . It is not disputed that the father has a right to meet his daughter periodically as permitted by the Family Court and if the details of such access have not been more particularly set out, that may be the grievance of the father and, therefore, we do not find 2 any merit in the challenge raised by the appellant - wife to the said order. . Hence the appeal is dismissed in limine. . This order would not come in the way of the appellant to approach this Court if any adverse order is passed by the Family Court in the pending applications. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)