1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8173/2007 Firm Bansal Ginning Vs. Commissioner, Workman & Oil Mill Compensation & Ors. Date of Order :: 26.5.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. G.J. Gupta, for the petitioner. ... By this petition for writ validity propriety an correctness of the order dated 19.10.2007 passed by the Commissioner, Workman Compensation Act, Sriganganagar is assailed. The Commissioner, Workman Compensation Act, Sriganganagar by the judgment dated 31.8.2006 allowed compensation in a tune of Rs.1,77,904/- to the workman Sh. Om Prakash. An application subsequently was filed by the present petitioner stating therein that the application for compensation was decided by the Commissioner without getting the notice served upon the employer. The application aforesaid came to be rejected by the order impugned by the 9.10.2007. The argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the notice on basis of which service is found satisfactory was never offered for service to the petitioner. I have examined the order impugned. It is apparent from perusal 2 of the order impugned that the petitioner after getting the service effected appeared before the Court on 28.8.2005 and also put his signatures on the order sheet. The notice issued thereafter in the name of firm was also served on 18.8.2005. The acknowledgment effecting service also bears signatures of the petitioner. In view of the factual position above, the contention advanced is absolutely ill-founded. The writ petition, therefore, is having no merit, hence, dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal