IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.581 of 2007 Date of Decision : June 03, 2011. Kitab Kaur .....Petitioner versus Smt.Shakuntla Jakhu and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Munish Bansal, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This contempt petition was adjourned sine die vide order dated 15.1.2009, to be put up after the decision of SLP (Civil) No.6438 of 2007 which was pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. As per the office report, the aforementioned SLP has been dismissed vide order dated 13.4.2009. There is, thus, no reason whatsoever for the respondents not to comply with the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 21.7.2006 passed in CWP No.5023 of 2002. However, keeping in view the fact that the respondents were pursuing their remedy of appeal, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority, C.O.C.P.No.581 of 2007 [2] Panchkula and other authorities to do the needful within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, failing which the petitioner shall be at liberty to get this petition revived. Rule is discharged. June 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE