IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 15507 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.8.2010. Subhash Nagpal and others --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioners are residents of the town of Tohana (Haryana). It is stated that they are residing in an area known as Medical Enclave/Civil Hospital area, which is situated adjoining to the Chandigarh Road, Tohana. The area comprises of about 46 acres of land and the entire area seems to have been sold in the shape of plots, where the petitioners and a number of other persons have constructed their residential houses. The grievance of the petitioners is that the State Govt., even though, formulated schemes for regularization of the colonies but the colony, where the petitioners are residing, has not been regularized till date. Petitioners filed a writ petition being CWP No. 17002 of 2006 which came to be disposed of vide order dated 6.3.2009 as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach the CWP. No. 15507 of 2010 -2- Director, Urban & Local Bodies, Haryana with a representation. The petitioners, accordingly, approached the Director, Urban & Local Bodies, Haryana with a representation (Annexure P-11). It is alleged that the said representation has not been decided so far. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation served by the petitioners, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 30.8.2010. lucky