1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.853/2009 (Municipal Council, Pali & Ors. Vs. Permanent Lok Adalat, Pali & Ors.) Date of order : 06.02.2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. T.S. Champawat, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is very strange that petitioner is instrumentality of the State which is Municipal Council, Pali first of all accepted the order passed by Lok Adalat dated 31.3.2006 for construction of Nala. They also proceeded to execute the said order but later on certain objections were raised by some interested persons, therefore, now after three years, the Municipal Council, Pali is challenging the order passed by Lok Adalat. The legislature has purposely established Lok Adalats for redressal of public grievances and to settle the dispute between the parties by negotiation but here in this case, the Municipal Council, Pali is challenging the order passed by the Lok Adalat after three years without disclosing reasons for delay, that too, after 2 initiating the proceedings to execute the said order. In my opinion, such an action of the Municipal Council, Pali is required to be deprecated and such a writ petition is not requited to be entertained under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. In my opinion, disciplinary proceedings should be initiated against the person who has taken decision for filing this writ petition to challenge the impugned order dated 31.3.2006 passed by the Lok Adalat which is accepted earlier by the Municipal Council, Pali and proceeded to execute the order. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun