IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-22694 OF 2010 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 07.03.2011 Pardeep Kumar ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. P. S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J. S. Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Mr. R. K. Jindal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Jagmal Singh, has stated at the bar that the matter has been compromised for ` 10 lacs out of which ` 5 lacs has been paid to the complainant. So, in view of the above, the order dated 30.09.2009 is made absolute. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner resile from the compromise, the complainant shall have the right to apply for cancellation of bail. Disposed of. MARCH 07, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE