IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 118 of 2011. Decided on: 1st March, 2011. Achala Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner, who is a PTA teacher, is aggrieved since she is not in a position to continue in view of the posting of the third respondent, who is a regular appointee. In case, the petitioner is in a position to point out open vacancy where the third respondent is willing to be accommodated, the second respondent shall accommodate the third respondent in that place and the petitioner shall be permitted to continue as PTA teacher till otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 1st March, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.