CWP No.12625 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.12625 of 2009 Date of Decision: 10.05.2010 **** Santokh Singh Palleh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. B.S. Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). This order shall dispose of CWPs No.12625 & 12629 of 2009 as common issues are involved for adjudication. The petitioners are the retired JBT Teachers from the Education Department, Government of Punjab. They seek a direction to the respondents for counting their ad hoc service/leave vacancy service rendered prior to the regularization of their services towards retiral benefits. CWP No.12625 of 2009.doc - 2 – (2). Learned counsel for the parties state that the controversy involved is squarely covered by the decision dated 21.04.2009 rendered by this Court in CWP No.11451 of 2008 titled as Harjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab and others). (3). The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed in terms of Harjit Kaur’s case (supra), however, with a direction to the respondents to verify the service particulars of the petitioner(s) and if their plea is found correct, grant them the benefit permissible under the above- mentioned judgement. (4). The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (5). Ordered accordingly. (6). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 10.05.2010 vishal shonkar