IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23574 of 2010 LALLU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the actual recovery has been made from one Anup Yadav and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that it was the petitioner who kept the motor cycle in the house of Anup Yadav who is the brother-in-law of the petitioner. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, learned Court below may consider the regular bail application, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the actual recovery has been made from Anup Yadav and other similarly situated person Raj Kumar Chaudhary has been granted bail. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)