IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-10792 of 2009 Date of decision : 22.4.2009. ... Sushma Chauhan and another ................ Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioners executed agreement to sell in favour of the complainant but prior to that they have already sold the land to one Asha Rani. So, prima facie the ingredients of offence under Section 420 IPC are made out. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the written statement, the stand has been taken that no agreement has been executed and the land has already been sold. So, case for quashing is made out. I have carefully considered the said submission but do not find any force in that submission. It is the matter of evidence whether the alleged agreement is forged, as alleged by the petitioners. So, no ground for interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is made out. The petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 22.4.2009. Judge chugh