IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18422 of 2010 NAWAL KISHORE @ BHULETAN PRASAD GUPTA, SON OF SRI TARKESHWAR PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 28.10.2009 vide Cr. Misc. 31801 of 2009 the petitioner was refused bail at that stage. Now, the petitioner has remained in custody since 19.5.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas at Sasaram in Dawath P.S. Case No. 172 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, second bailor shall be the father of the of the petitioner and third one shall be the local. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at 2 liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)