IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44290 of 2010 SHREE NARAYAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 05.01.2011 Heard both sides. This is repeat application seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 364/34 of the Penal Code. Earlier petitioner along with another co-accused, namely, Lalit Kumar Mishra @ Lalit Mishra had moved this Court for anticipatory bail which was considered and rejected by order dated 23.04.2009 (Annexure-1). Aforesaid order dated 23.04.2009 shall eloquently indicate the reasons for refusal of anticipatory bail. Instead of submitting to the jurisdiction of the Court, the petitioner has again renewed prayer for anticipatory bail after lapse of more than 18 months. It is submitted that the father of the girl, namely, Gopi Kant Mishra as well as the girl have since been privileged with anticipatory bail. Having regard to the materials on record, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall, however, not prejudice the petitioner if he appears in the Court below and seeks bail within a period of 04 weeks from today. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)