1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION 12117/2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION 475/2009 IN FIRST APPEAL 38/2009 The State of Maharashtra and others ...Petitioner versus Shiladevi Dnyaneshwar Pawar ..Respondents. .... Shri D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for petitioner. CORAM : S.B. DESHMUKH, J. SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,j Date : 20-11-2009 PER COURT. :- 1. Perused. Heard learned counsel for applicant. 2. The applicant has preferred present application requesting to extend time to deposit amount of compensation within further period of four weeks and also prayed that, office be directed to accept cheque / demand draft No.1186459. 3. On perusal of the contents of the present application, it appears that, the reasons for non compliance of the earlier order have been stated in para 5 to 8 and said reasons appear to be satisfactory. Hence, we are inclined to allow present 2 application. Accordingly, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses B and C thereof and same stands disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J) [S.B. DESHMUKH, J.] tsk/ca12117.09