v l0 ^^ c f ^"' IILJ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI3GABH AdLa&S^ w.y.No.. / f^ ./2001 ( P. I, L. ) PETITIOHJERS ...^^ .^sgg'< v^ >\ ^.J^>v' ql.. ^^yt' ^ ^ ....I- i 1, @r. ©ojuI^ul S/0 B.D.i^ul, aged about 3^- years Worklng President of Republic -^rfcy of Indta, State of Chhattisgaria B/o Laxmi Nagar, J^chpedhi Naka, Baipur. 2, Murarilal Awastbi S/o Late Laxmi Kai^yan Awastbi, aged about J^ years B/o Vlllage- Khamtazai, BiLaspur* - Versus - •\^'^^y 't^.v^ ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through: Secretary, Depar"faa%t of Horae,Mantralaya, Shas-fcri Cfaowk, Baipur, 2. HandKumar ^.tel S/o aged about 4^ years, At present Home Mlnister, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Sfaastri Chowk, Balpur. 3» Secretazy, Deparfcment of Health ,Mantralaya, Sbastri Chowk, Raipur. 4. Maharshl Ved Vigyan VjLiya ?itham(Begistered Trust) Mafaarsbi ISagar, Dadri Boad HoAla District-Gajl%bad(U.P.) , ^ - 2 - $• Maharshi Vedic Swastfaya Awara Anusandhan Kendra tbroiigfas its JBxecutive ©Irector, Stari Virsndra ^tel, Garha, Jal3alpur(M«P») 6>* Superlntendent of Poliee, BiLaspur. 7» Collector ( the then) Bilaspur, 8, V.K.Mishra, S/o aged about 48 years, Town Inspector, Police Station-Civil Liaes, Bilaspur. 9. S.P.Singh S/o aged about 46 years, Town Inspector, Police Station- City Kotwali, Bilaspur* 10, Ganesh Kvisa.r Agarwal, S/o HanuiHan Prasad Agarwal, aged about 24- years R/o liew Sarteanda, Bllaspur. 11, Chattisgarh Swasthya Awam Manav Kalyan Samiti tbroughs Its Secretary, ImLipara, Bilaspur. 12. Cfaief Medieal and Health Offieer, Distriet Hospital, Bilaspur, P&TITIQN UND2E AHTICLE 226/227 QF THE GQNSTITUTION OF EiDIA IN PUBLIG BITEBEST E'OB ISSUAKCE OF WRIT OP CERTIQBARI.MAmAMlB gaQHIBlTION 4ND FOR FUBTHER <&yPBOmiATI DIRBCTIONS OR ORDERS. XI-HC-22 ^Tf^I^T 1^Nl3:TI^T aT1RTSF' ?T?tU 1 8-2001 .4^" ^"•^ ^ ^"^ '^iNld4, ^-(li^'li^, i^<ni<:i^< 3??^r 1cra^ W.P.no.l193/2001 ^ira^'^^t^"*''^" 'l''*<^"^ '20° •f^y""-" 3T[^[ iT^TW ^f^T Shri Prashant Jayajswal for the petitioners ^ Shri N ,K • Shukla < py.A .G.» f,or t he State » Heard» During the ^ourse of arguments^ Dr^ Shukla submitted that the p^tltioners had jolned respondents no •2^6 and 7 unjnecessarily and no cause has been shown for lt» Shri Jayaswal subm advised the petltloners not and 7 Thls petition has ^ interest ±M litigatlon, Th in the Courts^nd oertaln do. effect^ Counsel for the pelj. petltioner no ,1 Dr ^Goju Paujj and the petltioner no<>2 Mur4 the Civil RevislonNo.1050/: Swasthya Evam Anusandhan Ken^ra through its Executive Dlrector Viredflra ^atel is -^TZj^qt^ 'RPT^ff ^ ftT^t ^N^R ^ 3?RTH •STT^T tted that he himself had -y to join respondents no»2^6 »een flledi styllng as publlc dispute is already pendlng 'ument s have been fl le d to that .Itloners sulmits that 1s a publlc spirlted person rilal Awasthy is son of ' Laxmi Narayan Awasthy,who h^s been treated and given medical facilities In the hcjspltal run by resporrient no.ll. Tbe dispute is pen^lng in the Courts and 'one of POO filed Iby Maharshi •Vedic jpendlng e^en in fhe High Court, In the said revision petltlo^. some interventlon applicatlon has also been filed, '•^•tfe^ XI-HC—78 "r ^^ ^NT^N, '©^Wf^,fs«^l^^< WB> No.ll 93/2001 WH^IT^W^ •^200 ^T^T 'q^^ ('t^t3^1) ^I^T ^Tt^te ^[^? ^jlt^M^lNi' ^^R^iN^?? tljie 2 So far a s the partle lease are con<3erned^ the theme One of t he g rounds r^ that the news flashed in the owners of the buildlng reached -in the hospltal an<$ Officers of the Chhattisga^ objected and locked the ho^ the dispute arose ^ The pol4 controlled the situation<» Dr.Shiikla, Dy,A«G.. on spofc on getting of Infoif and the Superintendent of are responable ^ We repeatedly asked satlsfy us regardlng the m4 well as the rlght• He was aE affldavlt does not contain We have c onsidered having rightor interest In m^tter is belng adjudicated befcween t^ litlgations are going on in .civll'court and revisiorj ^rqfeNh wi^if ^ 1t^ 'tN^R ^ ^N W^T .Ised In the petitlon appears newspaper to the effect that where the hospltal is running tried to lock the s ame • The •h Manav Kalyan Sewa Samiti ;Fd.tal franlnslde* Thereafter, ce reached on the spot and tubmits thafe if pollce reaches i^ then how the Collector |>olice and certaln other persons Infoifmation, ^he petltloners11 counsel to ^lntainablllty and the locus as jsked to read the affldavit. The |the required details^ I-ie matter and found that since be!tween the rival parties already 1s al sq pendl nq whe.re re^pegtlve XI-HC-'-78 ^^ ^i^i^i^, ^ttiww, ^ww^ n-^ -^^-a- ......W.<.RaNo.-1193/2.Q.Ql.. 'WWtr^TW^""""""'y""'w""*"fc'"ws'>''""'^'W^;200 \ 3tt^T1^^T(^(f3^'^) ;3^l^?<^t^ ^iT ^^ S^N^ !ll h li,ir>-, ¥^!W^t?^fl^T 3 ~i rights are being adjudicat^d is flled in revlsion^ it i^ entertaln the present petl^ In the case of Malik and others, reported in 20(1)0(1 )JLJ 36, the Apex Court has peti-tj.lon held that if In the garb oj actualiy an indlvidual ts l^it out or protected, it would not to entertaln such of innovation of public frusfcrated^ Rules of prudence an4 rlghts of the affected We do not flnd any is accordingly dlsmissed wj So far as Shrl Prash^i the petltioners 1s concern^d though he has expressed th^t not to join respondents no annoyed or it may be taken dwell further as partles par^les m^rlt aile ^nf^N -w^ife^tN^n '^^iltm^it^ and even intervention application In the publlc Interest not to lon* Brothers vs^ Narendra Dadhich public interest lltigatlon^ iijitereBfe is sought to be carried 1 be the boundeni duty of the Court as otherwise the very purp©©e litigatlon will be inferest caution also requlre that the may also be protected^ In the petltion, The petltion ith COStSe [nt Jayaswal^ learned counsel for t^ durlng course of argiiment he had advised his clients |2^6 and 7 as the Court gets |otherwi se ^ we do not wi sh to fco be jolned as per la^r,lf I / ^) T XI-HC—VS '3^ "4Nl<n'li, ^xi1<-i<i(o, fs|<ni'y^< W.PoNo,1193/2001 w^mr^pncis •^100 ^T^T 'q^RT (^ii^^r) 'SI^^Tf^T^ '<?^T W^T^^ra' l!^ ..^ • w (1?2) ^^' ^"^T^R ^ft^ 3?I^Y 4 required^ and thls Court ha The Courts have to and do towarc^s one and alle Shrl ^si^xxsi^sxs^ which appears It is accepted^ He has howe lE^Tqf^ft^ iqni^f "^ fec^T iN^R iT^°^3?i^^ ^ no malice towards anyone ^ p^rform constltutional obligations payaswal submitted an apology fco be from the bottom of hearfce l^er to be careful ^ Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge