IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41247 of 2009 1. RAM JEE YADAV, S/o late Ramprit Yadav 2. Kamlesh Yadav, S/o late Ramprit Yadav 3. Laxman Yadav, S/o Ramprit Yadav All are resident of village Harpura, P.S. Kadona (O.P.) Jehanabad, District Jehanabad ….. Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……… Opp. Party ----------- 2 07.12.2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 154 of 2009 for offence punishable under Sections 147,323,341,307, 379/504 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added upon the death of the father of the informant. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the present case is a counter blast to the case instituted by them giving rise to Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 149 of 2009 copy of which has been annexed as Annexure 2 to the bail application. It is submitted that the allegation set out in the present case is omnibus in nature and 2 no specific role has been assigned to either of these petitioners save and except general allegation of assaulting the informant and his father. He submits that origin of the occurrence is set out in case instituted by them giving rise to Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 149 of 2009. He further submits that the present case has been instituted after lapse of almost 6 days on 29.4.2009 for an occurrence said to have an occurred on 23.4.2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances set forth, let petitioners Ram Jee Yadav, Kamlesh Yadav and Laxman Yadav be released on bail upon each one of them individually furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 154 of 2009 subject to the condition that these petitioners would attend the Court below on each and every date fixed and on failure on the part of either of the petitioner to attend the Court 3 below on two consecutive dates without giving reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below, the Court below would be at liberty to initiate proceeding against him for cancellation of his bail and for taking him into custody . Spd/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)