IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3606 of 2010 MAHENDRA PRASAD YADAV . Versus THE B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY & ORS . ----------- 2 30.8.2010 This application has been filed by the Secretary of the Governing Body of Degree College, Supaul for modification of order dated 19.8.2010 passed in CWJC No. 5545 of 2010.By the said order this Court had ,inter alia , directed that till enquiry is conducted by the University into authenticity of teaching and non teaching staff of the College , the grant that they have received from the State Government would not be distributed amongst the employees of the College. The Secretary of the Governing Body by this modification application points out that except in one or two cases there is no grievance by any person or any dispute. Therefore, the order, as passed by this Court, would unnecessarily affect almost two hundred other persons, who are anxiously awaiting this payment. This has come after decades. The writ petitioner is present. He does not oppose the proposition, factual and legal as put in this application for modification. Learned counsel for B.N.Mandal University also does not oppose the modification as sought. Having considered I deem it proper to modify the order dated 19.8.2010 passed in CWJC No.5545 of 2010 as under noted: 2 The Governing Body would make out a clear statement showing payment individually to teaching and non teaching employees and the amounts in respect thereof. That would be given to the University and also put up in the College Notice Board. Any person objecting to the same would file his objection before the College and the Registrar of the University. Notwithstanding objection , payment would be made as per allocation made by the College but in so far as objecting cases are concerned, the person receiving payment would have given an undertaking on affidavit to the College and the University that in case it is found that they have wrongly been paid, they would refund the amount of money and pay the same to the person found entitle to the payment within fifteen days of such order of the University. University, on objection being filed in relation to only those cases, would then carry out enquiry and for the said purpose would have the authority to see the papers if necessity arises. It would within one month decide the issue after notice to the party by a speaking order in that regard. It is pointed out by Mr. Anand Kr. Ojha, that the State Government had sought for Utilization Certificate to be submitted by 31st of August, 20120. In view of the controversy and the order of this Court that is impossible now. Considering the aforesaid controversy as raised and the order of this Court, the Utilization Certificate would now be sent within two weeks from today with a remark with regard to dispute as aforesaid. 3 Thus, to the aforesaid extent, the order, as aforesaid, is modified. This application is thus disposed of. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)