1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICGTION SUIT NO. 1951 OF 1996 Sanket Vanraj Parikh & Anr. ... Plaintiffs vs. Kiritkumar Amrutlal Doshi . . . . ... Defendants Mr. R. M. Nakhwa i/b. Mrs. S.A. Dhamale for plaintiffs Defendant present in person CORAM: A. S. AGUIAR J. Date: December, 2, 2004 P.C. Learned Advocate for the plaintiffs states that the parties have settled the dispute and filed consent terms. Consent terms signed by the plaintiffs and their advocates as also by defendant who is present in person. However, the defendant has not been identified by any advocate. He states that his advocate Mr. Phadnis is bed ridden and cannot attend the court. Defendant is identified by one Vithal Gopal Pai, Secretary of the Suryamukhi Cooperative Housing Society, wherein the suit flat is situated. Consent term taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Decree in terms of consent terms. Undertakings contained in the consent terms accepted. Suit is disposed of. No order as to costs. Refund as per rules. C. C. expedited. (A. S. AGUIAR J.)