IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 RP.No. 837 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28444/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/3RD RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------- M/S. VENKITNGU FRMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.187, VENKITANGU P.O., VENKITANGU VILAGE, CHAVKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADVS. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1, 2, 4 & 5 IN WPC: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SHANMUGHANARAYANAN, S/O.APPUKUTTY, EDUVAYYIL KAZHUNKIL HOUSE, KANNOTH P.O., VENKITANGU VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680001. 2. THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695001. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR PIN 680001. 4. T.C. ANDREWS, THOLATH HOUSE, 6/603, COLLEGE ROAD, ELTHURUTHU P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680003. 5. THE MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., MULLASSERRY BRANCH, MULLASSERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680002. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN BY SENIOR GOBVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.RAJASREE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 837 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 28444 of 2009 A ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2011 O R D E R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ This Review Petition is filed by the third respondent in W.P.(C) No.28444/2009, seeking review of the order dated 04.11.2011. By the said order, this Court directed the fifth respondent in the writ petition not to release an amount of `13 lakhs to the review petitioner herein. The said amount was ordered on the basis of the averment that only `13 lakhs is due to the review petitioner from the writ petitioner. However, in the Review Petition it is now pointed out that an amount of `20,36,603/- is due. 2. In view of the said averment, the order dated 04.11.2011 is reviewed and it is directed that the fifth respondent shall not release an amount of `20,36,603/- to the writ petitioner. Review Petition is disposed of above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/23/11