..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1086 OF 2008 Abdul Malik @ Abdul Kalim Khan. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Pradip Rajput, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.H.I. Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 9th July, 2008. DATED : 9th July, 2008. DATED : 9th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.505 of 2007 of Malad Police Station. The said case is under Section 489(B)(C), 420 r/w. 34 of IPC. 3. The applicant was found in possession of counterfeit currency notes. The applicant was caught red handed while trying to use one of the counterfeit currency notes as genuine. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that coaccused Dr.Jitendra Vishwakarma has been granted bail and the case of Dr.Jitendra Vishwakarma is the same as that of the present applicant. However, it is seen that coaccused Dr.Jitendra Vishwakarma did not use any of the ..(2).. counterfeit currency notes as genuine and he was only found in possession of the counterfeit currency notes. Hence it cannot be said that the case of the applicant and that of coaccused Dr.Jitendra Vishwakarma is same. Hence, no case is made out for grant of bail on the ground of parity. 5. Thereafter it was submitted that there is recovery of colour Xerox machine at the instance of the coaccused Raghav Prasad and it is the prosecution case that this colour Xerox machine was used to make counterfeit currency notes. It is submitted that coaccused Raghav Prasad was granted bail. Hence the applicant be released on bail on the ground of parity. Looking to the role of the applicant, it cannot be said that the case of the applicant and that of coaccused Raghav Prasad is same. Hence, no case is made out for grant of bail on the ground of parity. 6. Criminal Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)