IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24225 of 2010 1. ROHIT @ ROHIT KUMAR 2. Nand Lal Paswan 3. Jail Shankar Singh @ Jata Shankar Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Money is taken in name of brick and cement and said that price is paid to brick kiln owner and cement shop owner which in course of inquiry found false is the allegation. What can be the appropriate section of penal code or any penal enactment may not be a ground to save petitioners no.2 and 3 who are alleged for the same. Undoubtedly, petitioner no.1 has not been levelled for any such allegation. He is alleged for giving abuse while the money was to be realized. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners no.2 and 3 is rejected and at the same time, prayer of the petitioner no.1 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 93 of 2009 above named petitioner no.1 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)