IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2220 of 2011 Sushma Kumari Versus Vice Chancellor, B.R.Ambedkar University & ors ---------------------------------- 2. 07.09.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite parties. The petitioner wants modification of the final order passed in CWJC No. 9774 of 2010 disposing the writ application on 5.10.2010. Learned Counsel submits that the respondents have not complied the order of the Court by issuance of a show cause notice and consideration of the reply thereafter. It has therefore become necessary to prefer this application for modification for enabling her to appear at the second part of the L.L.B. examination for the Session 2009-2010. Once the writ petition has been finally disposed, this Court has become functus officio in the matter. The Court lacks jurisdiction in exercise of power of modification to enlarge the scope of the original order itself. Any relief beyond the order dated 5.10.2010 can only be a subject matter of fresh proceeding. The modification application is disposed as misconceived. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)