WPMS 2411/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks to claim injunction on the basis and on the strength of an unregistered agreement to sell. It is alleged that based on this unregistered agreement to sell, the petitioner was given possession and thereafter, he constructed a house in which he is living. Respondent no. 1, who was the alleged seller and owner, has now executed a registered sale deed in favour of respondent no. 2. It has now been alleged that respondent no. 2, on the strength of the sale deed executed in her favour, is encroaching upon the property. Consequently, the suit for the injunction was filed. In the light of the fact that the petitioner is claiming on the basis of an unregistered agreement, which document cannot be considered at this stage and in the absence of other evidence being led on the question of construction of the house and possession, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned orders at this stage since the Court is of the opinion that only after evidence is led a definite conclusion can be drawn. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 16-11-2011 SP