THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.189 of 2010 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court in order, dated 25.09.2009 passed in WPMP.No.27239 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.20930 of 2009. Petitioner claims ownership and possession with regard to land admeasuring Acs.4.00 cents covered by Survey No.369/1 at Madhurawada Village. When the above said piece of land was shown in the list of assigned lands, the petitioner has questioned the same on the ground that it was not an assigned land at all. This Court by order, dated 25.09.2009 passed in WPMP.No.27239 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.20930 of 2009, directed Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, to conduct independent enquiry on the claim of the petitioner for deletion of the aforesaid piece of land from the list of assigned lands and consequently, intimate the registration department. In this case, it is to be noticed that in compliance of the directions issued by this Court, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, has passed order, dated 07.04.2010 in Rc.No.5619/2008/A by recording a finding that the land covered by Survey Nos.368/2, 368/3, 369/1 and 369/2 of Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural belongs to the Government and the petitioners are not entitled to any relief as sought by them. It is also to be noticed that pursuant to the interim orders in the contempt proceedings, further order is also passed by independently examining the claim of the petitioner, by the District Collector, Visakhapatnam on 12.10.2010 and that the petitioner has already questioned the said order by filing separate Writ Petition. In view of order, dated 07.04.2010 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, and further order, dated 12.10.2010 passed by the District Collector, Visakhapatnam, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case to accept the plea of the petitioner that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court. For the aforesaid reasons, the Contempt Case is devoid of merit, and it is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 27th JULY, 2011. kvni