IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVIEW PETITION N0. f^ OF 2011 Sini APPLICANT PETITIONER ,nt®dby^3" oei^"-,"^"^^'"/ NPN-APPLICANT RESPONDENT >«^^B<" 1. M/s Vinayak Construction Purana Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) Through its Sole Proprietor Smt. Bhawna Agrawal, aged about 38 years, W/o Shri Sushil Kumar Agrawal, Occupation Business, R/o Purana Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, (C.G.) Through: Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (C.G.) REVIEW PETITION UNDER RULE 90 READ WITH RULE 87 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH RULES. 2007 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06.04.2011 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. (227) N0.1715/2011 .^. ^ •\lf .M ^^ 1^-11 I! ^aiS^ 1 ^^ Rev|ew_Pttlt|wn_Na,6t_Qf2011 APPy&ANT Petitloner ^O^-APPLiCANT Respondent M/s. Vinayak Construction Versus IVIunJdpaj Corporation, Bijaspur Revlew petition under Ruie 90 r/W Rule 87 of Hiah Court of Chhattisaarh Rules. 2007 S.B: Hon'ble ^r.Justice N.K.Aaan^al Present : Shri HarshWardhan.Advocatefortheappllcant. (Passedon 27.09.2011) 1. Heard Shri Harsh Wardhan, counsel for the revjew petitioners in Chamber under the provislons of Rute 90 (2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007. 2. Shri Harsh Wardhan submits that the clvlj sult has already been decided by the triai Court, 3. 4. In vlew of the fact that the clvli sult itseif has been decided by the triai Court, this revlew petitlon has now become infructuous. Accordingiy, the review petition is dismissed as havlng become jnfructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge