IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2633 of 2010 PARSHURAM YADAV S/O LATE BIRA YADAV R/O VILL.- TARWA KHURDA, P.O.- BAKULARI, P.S.- GUTHANI AND DISTT.- SIWAN Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER HAJIPUR, E.C. RAILWAY, HAJIPUR 2. THE SECURITY & COMMISSIONER RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, E.C. RAILWAY, HAJIPUR 3. THE COMMANDENT RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, MUGALSARAI DIVISION, E.C. RAILWAY, MUGALSARAI 4. THE SECURITY OFFICER RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, MUGALSARAI DIVISION, E.C. RAILWAY, MUGALSARAI 5. THE ASSISTANT SECURITY OFFICER RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, MUGALSARAI DIVISION, E.C. RAILWAY, MUGALSARAI ----------- 2 22.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Union of India. At the outset learned counsel appearing for the Union of India submits that no cause of action has accrued within the State of Bihar as the petitioner was dismissed from service in the year 1985 by the respondent no.5, and as such, this writ application is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer of the petitioner is for payment of retiral dues, however, he is not in position to lay any claim over any authority in the State of Bihar. The grievance of the petitioner is for directing the respondent nos. 3 & 5 for payment of retiral dues and also for quashing the order dated 04.11.1985 issued by the respondent no.5 dismissing the petitioner from service. Considering the submissions of the parties and the averments made in the writ application, I do not find that any cause of action arose within the State of Bihar, and as such, this writ application is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, if petitioner, so advised, may present the writ application before the appropriate Court. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)