HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 4727 OF 2008 DATED 4th December, 2014. BETWEEN Jinugu Venkateswarlu ….Petitioner And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and ors. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 4727 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents. This Writ Petition was filed calling for the records in MC.No.127/2000 dated 28.02.2003 on the file of the third respondent as confirmed in Crl.A.No.89 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Khammam and consequential order in RC.No.20/1823/2000, dated 09.03.2007 on the file of the fourth respondent and to quash the same. A consequential direction was also sought directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as hawker for distribution of kerosene under Public Distribution System for the villages of Kondrupadu and Adavimallella in Khmmam District. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the fourth respondent passed an order on 09.03.2007 pursuant to the judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Khammam passed in Criminal Appeal No. 89 of 2003, dated 06.05.2005, confirming the order dated 28.02.2003 in M.C.No. 127 of 2000 of the Joint Collector, Khammam. It is apparent that the order in Criminal Appeal No. 89 of 2003, dated 06.05.2005 was not challenged till today. The consequential order is passed on 09.03.2007. The Criminal Appeal was filed under Section 6-C of the Essential Commodities Act aggrieved by the order of the Joint Collector passed in MC.No.127 of 2000, dated 28.02.2003, and the said Criminal Appeal was dismissed and in view of the finding of fact recorded by both the Courts below—the Joint Collector, Khammam and the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Khammam, the said orders cannot be said to be bad. Now the present impugned order is passed in pursuance of the said orders. No interim suspension of the same was granted at the time of admission of the Writ Petition. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication inasmuch as consequential order cannot be set aside when the judgment in Crl.A.No. 89 of 2000 confirming the order of the third respondent dated 28.08.2003 stands as it is. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration if any in the Writ Petition shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs. --------------------------------------------------- JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO DATED 4th December, 2014. Msnrx