HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.R.P.No. 4362 of 2007 Date:27-08-2011 Between: Veesapu Satyavamma ..….. Revision Petitioner And Kona Varalaxmi ………. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.R.P.No. 4362 of 2007 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order, dated 23- 08-2007 passed in T.O.P.No.336 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam. The petitioner herein is the respondent in the said T.O.P. 2. The respondent herein filed the said T.O.P.No.336 of 2006 under Section 24 of C.P.C. before the lower Court seeking transfer of Original Suit No.453 of 2004 from the file of the VII Additional District Court (FTC), Visakhapatnam, to the file of the X Additional District Court (FTC), Anakapalle to be tried along with Original Suit No.439 of 2004. The learned District Judge, after hearing both sides, allowed the petition as prayed for, through the order dated 23-08-2007 in T.O.P.No.336 of 2006. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent therein preferred the present Revision Petition. 3. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner that the High Court of A.P. has issued circular in ROC.No.3465/E1/2003, dated 05-12-2003 constituting special Courts to deal with the cases of senior citizens and the VII Additional District Court (FTC), Visakhapatnam was constituted as Special Court under the said proceedings. Therefore, the transfer of O.S.No.453 of 2004 from the file of the VII Additional District Court (FTC), Visakhapatnam, since the revision petitioner is a senior citizen, is contrary to the said circular and thereby the impugned order is not sustainable. 4. Inspite of service of notice, none appears for the respondent. 5. Now the point for consideration is whether the impugned order, dated 23-08-2007 is sustainable? 6. As seen from the impugned order, the learned District Judge, having knowledge about the circular issued by the High Court in ROC.No.3465/E1/2003, dated 05-12-2003, interpreted it in his own way and transferred the matter to the X Additional District Court (FTC), Anakapalle, which is contrary to the said circular. As per the said circular, the VII Additional District Court (FTC), Visakhapatnam, is constituted as a designated Court to deal with the cases of senior citizens. Therefore, in any view of the matter, the impugned order, dated 23-08-2007 cannot be sustained and it is liable to be set aside. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The impugned order, dated 23-08-2007 is set aside. The lower Court is directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously, after giving opportunity to both parties, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. _______________ K.S. APPA RAO, J Date: 27-08-2011 YCR