t SINGLE Bl BV THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (S) N0^13 / 2006. PETITIONER —1. .^A- , ^•fi'% ^".'"•••CbP/" ..••""*. y^rh- ...•••"".c^^\1^"" ,^y^' ^•••"" ^v~ RESPONDENTS t?^*-. '^1 /y .sf"' ^s'?c*1 °'%<i K s^^^ ^l'X li ^^—^ ' ''«»,''~~-'<.?' ./.-' "%,. •"Tf xv'^1" ^-' "atsaxn^''' /^"Appadurai S/o Shri. Sundar Raj Aged around 65 years, Ex. BSP employee. Residina at: Plot No. 6, Link Street-1, Azad Market, Resali BHILAI-490091 Tehsil and Dist.: Durg (CG). VERSUS ^l The Managing Director (SAIL), Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan. BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). The Sr. Maaager (Personnel), (Recmitment Section) Bhilai Steel Plant, BHDLAI-490001 District: Durg fCG1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC. _f XI-HC-78 an^r^TR-fi1* iraT3n^TsbHi°b Soma *TTtT^fT aiHra» 3sr':?TPT[?ra', a'rfitf'is, Rii'ii*fy< •^.^&J..^...^^ 3llct<>l uach (yit^isK^eT) TOTRTC Hf?(T W^T so^zoos Heard Mr. B.P. Rao, coun^el forthe petitioner. By the instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed at the| Chl'!<[l-1<fl-< tlllflT ^ fel^l' <FSI«I< ^;3rf^IT3n^T lunder Arttele 226/227 of the Constitution of India, respondents be directed to consider the case of the petitioner's son for compassictiate appointment on account of the retirement of the petitioner m medicat ground. Thecase ofthe petitioner |s that he was emptoyed as Looo Operator in S-9 Grade and posted in Transpor^ & Diesel Organization of Bhitai Steel Plant. Subsequently, on medioal grounc| the petitioner was deoiared Permanent Medical Unfit for the job by the Medical petitloner was discharged from se the petitioner submitted a represe the petitioner's son for compassior| of persons have been appointed 3ard of Bhilai Steel Ptant. Based on that, the vice vide order dated 4-1-1999 and on that basis, itation for compasslonate appointment of hte son. Even after the lapse of6 yeare, tfie respondents have not considered the oase of ate appointment. Learned counsel for the p^titioner submitted that on similar ground number n compassionate appointment, whereas, the case of the petitioner's son is not be|^ considered. Therefore, the respondents be directed to consider the represent^tion af the petitioner and pass appropriate order in the matter. • Having heard learned coijinsel for the petitioner and having perused the petition and the doouments, the j>rayer made by learned counsel is just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, respondei|it No.2 is directed to sciutinlze tfte representation submitted by the petitioner for conl order on the application CCTisider|ng the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment of his son, in accorda|ice with the policy of respondent No.1. With the direction aforesaid Parties are entitled for certi] passionate appointment of his son and pass finai , the petition stands disposed of. fed copy ofthis order. Sd/- L.C-Bhadoo p.T.q.