IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6034 of 2010 GAJENDRA YADAV, Son of Late Chandradeo Yadav, resident of Village- Saidabad, P.S. Pali, District- Jehanabad....................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 19.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a police case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that though there is allegation against the petitioner of firing at thigh of the deceased but there is no injury in the post mortem report on thigh which has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is involved in four other cases. Though it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is on bail in all four cases but I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The prayer for bail is rejected. Though petitioner’s case was not committed to the court of sessions when the 2 bail application was filed whereas trial of others is at advance stage. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that now the case of the petitioner has also been committed. If the petitioner’s trial could not be concluded within one year then the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)