IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12386 of 2011 PATTI RAM @ PATIRAM RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 02.05.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add name of this petitioner which has been given in the formal FIR. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. It appears from perusal of the first information report that marriage of the petitioner had taken place with the deceased in the year 1998 but allegedly, the deceased died other than in normal circumstance. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation, two sets of witnesses came before the Investigating officer and first set of witness stated that the deceased died of diarrhoea whereas some witnesses supported the prosecution story. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the deceased died of diarrhoea and when the aforesaid fact came to notice of the informant, he filed a petition before the CJM, Motihari, East Champaran mentioning above stated fact. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Patti Ram @ Patiram Ram @ Ram Ram, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran in Kalyanpur P.S. Case no. 14/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)