IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 RP.No. 756 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21895/2011 Dated 11/08/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C) --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ABDUL JAMAL.K.K., S/O. KASSIM, KANNANCHAKKASSERY HOUSE, PATTANAM, VADAKKEKARA P.O. 2. SMT. PYARIJAN, W/O.ABDUL JAMAL, KANNANCHAKKASSERY HOUSE, PATTANAM, VADAKKEKARA P.O. BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SMT.RASHMI RAVINDRAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. NORTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK, N.M.G.TOWERS, PALLIKUNNU, KANNUR, REP.BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, PIN 670 004. 2. NORTH MALABARGRAMIN BANK, N.M.G.TOWERS, PALLIKUNNU, KANNUR, REP.BY ITS MANAGER, PIN 670 004. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NORTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK, N.M.G.TOWERS, NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM-683 513. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: AMG RP No.756/2011. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 – TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 01-09-2011 FURNISHED BY THE BANK. EXT.P2 – TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 03-10-2011 FURNISHED BY THE BANK. EXT.P3 – TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS FURNISHED BY THE BANK ON 14-10-2011 IN RESPECT OF TWO LOANS. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE AMG S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.756 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No.21895 OF 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 ORDER The petitioners in the writ petition have filed this review petition seeking review of my judgment dated 11.8.2011. The matter relates to proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act. I disposed of the writ petition as follows: “xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx The petitioners shall pay the balance amount due in ten equal monthly instalments starting from 1.9.2011. Every subsequent instalment shall be paid on the first working day of every succeeding month. If the petitioners pay the instalments on the due dates without default, coercive proceedings for recovery of the amounts shall be kept in abeyance. However, if the petitioners commit default in payment of any of the instalments, it would be open to the respondents to continue proceedings as now initiated without having to issue any fresh notice or proceedings in that regard. 2. The petitioners now seek review of the judgment by granting fifteen instalments instead of ten instalments and by changing the date of payment to 15th of every month instead of R.P.No.756/11 2 first of every month. 3. I am not inclined to change the number of instalments. However, I direct that the instalments shall be paid on the 1st working day after 14th of every month. All other conditions in the judgment would stand. The review petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd R.P.No.756/11 3