[1] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4675/2007 Smt. Sonu Vs.State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order: 18-5-2010 In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jodhpur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4675/2007 Smt. Sonu Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date : 18/05/2010. HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.N.A.Rajpurohit, for the petitioner. Mr. Durga Ram, Dy. Govt. Counsel. -- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The controversy involved herein has already been decided by this Court in SBCWP No. 4060/2010 (Harsha Choudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 14.05.2010, wherein it has been held as under: “10. This Court after hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner, is of the considered opinion that such questions of fact fraught with the consequence of the appointment of a person either to be cancelled or maintained and whether such appointments should be given to the petitioner in preference over private respondent or not, and whether the resolution of Gram Sabha can be said to be valid or not; and whether there are any bias or not etc., are all questions which are required to be determined on the basis of properly led evidence, which is required to be proved in accordance with provisions of Evidence Act in a competent civil court. In such circumstances, simply based on original or photocopies of certain documents, supported by affidavit in writ jurisdiction, cannot be accepted as gospel truths and proved evidence before a Court in extraordinary jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed, as in the opinion of this Court, petitioner has an alternative remedy of approaching the civil court under Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code. 11. This Court is further of the opinion that remedy by way of civil suit will be more appropriate and more easily [2] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4675/2007 Smt. Sonu Vs.State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order: 18-5-2010 accessible for the petitioner in a rural background and here likes case. The civil courts are spread all over the State and according to concept 'justice at the door steps', the civil courts are more readily available and accessible to these petitioners and, therefore, not only from the angle of questions of facts involved in the present writ petition, which are required to be established and determined, but also for the reason of more appropriate remedy for the petitioners, they are relegated to the civil courts. 12. In the result, the writ petitions dismissed with no order as to costs.” (Dr. Vineet Kothari), J. In the result, this writ petition stands dismissed in the terms of order passed in SBCWP No. 4060/2010 (supra). (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J. DJ/- baweja/- item no.2