RSA No. 608 of 2007 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … RSA No. 608 of 2007 Date of decision: January 28,2009 Kuldip Kaur and others ..Appellants. Versus Ranbir Singh and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. B.S.Thind, Advocate for the appellants Mr. K.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the respondents. .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the courts below whereby a suit for possession/joint possession as owner of the suit land with consequential relief of declaration that the sale deeds in question as detailed in the heading of the plaint are null and void, ineffective and against the rights of the plaintiff was dismissed . At the time of motion hearing on 26.2.2007, learned counsel for the appellant contended that in the year 1998-99 sale deeds were got executed in favour of the defendant from one Harbhag Singh, a dead drunkard, who was the husband of appellant Kuldip Kaur and father of appellants Gurpreet Singh and Jaswinder Singh and, thereafter, mutations were also sanctioned in favour of the defendants/respondents on the basis of those sale deeds. However, possession over the suit land continuously remained with the appellants. In support of this argument, learned counsel for the appellant also relied upon an order dated 10.11.2006 passed by Tehsildar-cum-Assistant Collector 2nd Grade and on this assertion, notice of motion was issued. In view of the aforesaid assertion that the appellants are already in possession of the suit land, the suit for possession/ joint possession of the land in dispute is not maintainable . RSA No. 608 of 2007 2 Learned counsel for the appellants was unable to controvert the aforesaid proposition of law. In view of this, I find no merit in this appeal. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. January 28,2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE