IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.721 of 2011 Rani Kumari, wife of Shri Saroj Kumar, resident of village- Bhaluahiya, P.S.-Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The State of Bihar through Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, through the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 5. The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Sitamarhi. 7. The Block Development Officer, Mejarganj Block, District- Sitamarhi. 8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Mejarganj Block, District- Sitamarhi. 9. The Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj Pachaharwa, Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi. 10. The Headmaster, Government Primary Schook, Bhaluahiya, P.S.- Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi. 11. Ramchandra Pandey, son of Ram Lakhan Pandey, resident of village- Marpasirpal, P.O.-Basbita, P.S.- Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi. ----------- 2. 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the order contained in Annexure-2 dated 7.03.2006 on basis whereof an attempt has been made to make out a new case on facts that the appellant was working on the post of Instructor and her resignation was accepted on 7.03.2006 for the said post of Instructor and not for the post of Shiksha Mitra to which she was appointed on 21.02.2006 vide Annexure-1. She could not have contested the election without resigning from the post of Siksha Mitra and that is the consistent case before the authorities below. Annexure-2 does not inspire confidence because it 2 contains many blanks which have been filled in different hands and it is a common knowledge that when service career is at stake, questionable documents appear subsequently. We are not persuaded to permit raising of new controversies on facts. Consistent case on facts was that the appellant was appointed to the post of Siksha Mitra in February, 2006 from which she resigned in order to be eligible to contest the office of Mukhiya. After failing to contest the election for some reasons, she is claiming a right to continue on the post of Siksha Mitra on account of her managing to join the said post after the election. In our view, the order of authorities and the Writ Court do not suffer from any illegality. The appeal is dismissed. V.K.Pandey (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)