IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19759 of 2009 ARVIND MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 25.07.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under sections 395 and 397 IPC. The case relates to commission of dacoity on running train. The FIR of course is against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only incriminating material against him is the confessional statement made by co-accused Ramchandra Yadav. It is stated that he named several persons, some of them have been granted bail by this Court including one Manoj Mistri. Learned counsel handed in an order dated 05.06.2008, passed in Cr.Misc. No.20809 of 2008 (Manoj Mistri Vs. State of Bihar) to show that not only the aforesaid co- accused has been granted bail by this Court but co-accused Ramchandra Yadav has also been granted bail by this Court under order dated 25.07.2007 which fact has been noticed in the order dated 05.06.2008. The certified copy so produced is placed on record and marked as ‘X’. It is contended that the petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each to the satisfaction of Sri K.K.Sinha, Special Railway Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Tr.no.1024/2007 arising out of Sone Nagar Rail P.S.Case No. 02/2006, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member. hrr ( Kishore K. Mandal )