IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4626 of 2009 Date of decision : 13.1.2010 Kanwaljit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Ajit Singh ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nikhil Chopra, Advocate for the respondent. S. D. ANAND, J. It is apparent from a conjunctive perusal of the impugned order and the pleadings raised in the context of the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, that certain facts had inadvertently escaped consideration of the learned Trial Judge. Those facts include the latest salary certification of the husband. The learned counsel for the parties state that there would have lot many other facts tobring to the notice of the learned Trial Court which would have relevant bearing on disposal of the maintenance plea filed by the petitioner wife. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the plea under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act afresh after hearing the parties and taking into consideration the latest carry home salary of the respondent-husband and also the fact that the respondent-husband has made a precise averment that he has aged parents to support. The exercise shall be concluded by the learned Trial Court within one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. January 13,2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE