GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 7928 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 7928 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 7928 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Shailesh Kantharia for the petitioner. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 9TH FEBRUARY, 2005 9TH FEBRUARY, 2005 9TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner claims a mandamus directing the respondent to appoint him as he was qualified and duly selected for appointment. The Supreme Court has very clearly observed in AIR 1991 S.C. page 1612 that even after selection no vested right is created in a candidate to claim appointment. In this view of the legal position, we see no reason to interfere. The petition is accordingly dismissed. ...