IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 28th day of January, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 94 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Dhoom Singh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 316/2009, U/s 323, 498A, 506 IPC & 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, PS Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ January 28, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the accused applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the victim, who are the co-accused in this case have been granted bail and the accused applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of the parity. He also submitted that the accused applicant has got no criminal history against him before this case, who is in jail since 15.12.2009. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Dhoom Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in like amount, to the satisfaction of JM, Roorkee. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) VACATION JUDGE 28.1.2010 PRABODH