IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9495 of 2003 Between: The Bhainsa Municipality, Rep. by its Chairperson, Sri Mohd. Jabeer Ahmed, S/o.M.A.Raheem, R/o.Bhainsa, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director Collector, Adilabad. 2 The Revenue District Officer, Adilabad. 3 The Executive Engineer (PH), Karimnagar. 4 The Deputy Executive Engineer (PH), Office of the Dy. EE (PH), Sub District, Adilabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring in so far as petitioner Municipality in concerned and to the extent of addition of Item 6, 7 and 9 in Annexure A of proceedings no.B5/1197/2003-2, dated:26.4.2003, issued by 1st Respondent by deleting Item 8 of resolution 92 dated:17.3.2003 of petitioner as illegal and null and void and for a consequential direction to the Ist Respondent to forthwith give administrative sanction to Item 8 of resolution No.92 dated:17.3.2003 of the petitioner Municipality in the interest of Justice and Equity and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.MANIK PRABHU Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. FOR R1,2,3,4 The Court made the following : . Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TML} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBASH REDDY W.P.No.9495 of 2003 ORDER: Sri K.Manik Prabhu, learned counsel for the petitioner, represented the subject matter in the writ petition has become infructuous. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________ 1st July 2009 KVR