:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2268 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2268 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2268 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL (St)NO.17645 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL (St)NO.17645 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL (St)NO.17645 OF 2005 Narayan Maruti Khatal & Ors. .. Applicants V/s Namdeo Ramrao Khatal & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.J.S.Ingale for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicants. None appears for the Respondents though served. Perused the Civil Application. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking the condonation of delay of 32 days in filing the above appeal. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of Applicant. Hence, the Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)