CWP No.23684 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.23684 of 2011 Date of decision:20.12.2011 Neelam Rani -----Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA Present:- Mr.Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. --- TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of Court, Mr.Satish Bhanot, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken up for final disposal in the light of the peculiar facts. The petitioner was appointed as Education Volunteer under the Sarv Siksha Abhiyan Authority on 5.8.2005. It has so transpired that the service of the petitioner was dispensed with on 30.8.2007. Even though on merits such Education Volunteers, who were appointed under the Sarv Siksha Abhiyan Authority, are to continue till such time regular incumbent joins on the post and on such basis no fault can be found in the impugned order but still it is not in dispute that the vacancy of education volunteer keeps arising. The instructions dated 29.11.2004 framed under Sarv Siksha Abhiyan Authority is a State Founded Scheme which carries an object to ensure that there is no education loss to the next generation. CWP No.23684 of 2011 2 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to consider the claim of the petitioner for re- employment as education volunteer wherever the vacancy is available strictly in accordance with the instructions dated 29.11.2004. December 20, 2011 ( TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA ) mks JUDGE