^ ^ c-zrQ Sl?^9 T" ^rftiPii ^•U ^ ^ =.,.l^ t; Ci'd ^rf^' ln the Honble High Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.(S) No, "74- 200@ ?- Petitioner ^ ^,^" iSS^'" ^"y y'r ^•>- ^.-" ^' Resppndent ^.^ ><s? ^^3 Parsadi Ram Sahu Aged 50 years S/o Shri Besahu Ram Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School, Bharda- Kala, Block Ginderdehi, District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS I.The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Education & Tribal Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2<The District Education Officer, Durg (C.G) ^3." Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Durg (C.G.) Wnt petition under articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of wnt in the natyre of MAN^AMUS, Certiorari, Prohibition and other suitable WRIT or writs, Order or orders, Directipn pr directipns. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BIb^SPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI J. Petjtipner WRTT PETTTION fS.l N0.72 OF 2007 : Oevesh Prasad versus Respondents PcLtitjoner The State fiovernment of Qihat^i^arh and others And WRIT PETTTION CS.) N0.74 OF 2007 Parsodi Ram Sahu versus ftespondents The State fiovcynnient of ChhattiS9arh cnd others Present : Mr. Ajoy Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arvind bubey. Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORbER (Passed on -riiis 16th doy of January. 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/re^iondents jointty submit that the facts and <^jestion of kw mvolved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwwvl- Kwnar Bhfuwhwj ¥S. Mimfe^ol Cwporotion, Owy cwfel aiwtlw^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitiwis are disyosed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yoahwant ^ww ffioawdwaj (Supra), subject to verification of +he fact as to whether -the petitioners have ocquired B.EdYB.TJ. Certificates at their owi expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur+her whether they have been paid •h»oadvance HTcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the conrwcted wit petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash 1 20060I)MPJR-CG96 1 s. ^