IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 202 OF 2005 SMT.SHOBHA GURUDAS GADEKAR, MAPUSA ....Petitioner GOA Versus MAPUSA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ....Respondents AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., Shri Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.P.Thali, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Shri S. Vahidulla, Addl. Government Advocate For respondent Nos.2 and 3. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 19th January, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard. By consent, the impugned order passed by the appellate authority i.e. respondent No.2 is hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent No.2 to re-consider the appeal in accordance with the provisions of law while keeping all the issues open for its consideration. Order accordingly. The petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. PS