IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25221 of 2009 FIRKAN @ FIRAN ANSARI @ MD.FIRMAN ANSARI, SON OF MUBARAK ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BOLHARI, P.S. HASDIHA, DISTRICT DUMKA (JHARKHAND) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that after institution of the case, motor-cycle was recovered and petitioner and others had succeeded in fleeing away from the place of occurrence by abandoning the motor-cycle. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that motor-cycle was not recovered from conscious possession of petitioner and he has not been put on test identification parade. However, he admits that petitioner is accused in five more cases of similar nature. Considering criminal antecedents of petitioner, this Court is not inclined to allow him on bail. The application is dismissed. If the trial of the case is not concluded within six months from its commencement, for no fault of petitioner, he will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)