1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2452 OF 2009 Dipak Laxman Admile & Ors. .. Applicants. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2460 OF 2009 Dayanand Devidas Sathe & Ors. .. Applicants. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.Ujwal Agandsurve for the applicants. Mrs.S.D.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 18th June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.76 of 2009 of Pandarpur Police Station, District Solapur. The said crime has been registered against the applicants and others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 395, 397 of IPC, section 3(25) C of Arms Act r/w 2 section 135 of Bombay Police Act. 3. Ms.Shinde, learned A.P.P., on instructions from Mr.Pramod Hondra, Dy.S.P., submits that they do not require custody of the applicants in connection with the instant offence at this stage. She further submits that if they require custody of the applicants they will give 72 hours notice to the applicants to enable them to approach the appropriate court. In view of the statement made by learned A.P.P., Mr.Agandsurve, learned counsel for the applicants does not press this application. The application is disposed of. It is needless to state that the applicants shall co-operate with the investigation. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)