: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.181 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs.Seema Chopda for the Petitioner. Mr.M.D. Siodia with Mr.Rohan Mahdik i/b Rustamji & Ginwala the Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. The only question is whether a formal order reinstating the Petitioner in service from 1.7.1996 ought to have been passed pursuant to the order dated 10.4.2003 passed by C.G.T.I. No.I. 2. At this stage, the Petitioner was unable to indicate any loss caused to him as a result of the formal order not having been passed. The application for regularization was kept open. The Petitioner did not succeed subsequently in : 2 : the proceedings adopted by him for obtaining regularization. 3. In the circumstances, I see no warrant for invoking contempt jurisdiction. It is however clarified that if the Petitioner has suffered any monetary loss or has been deprived of any other benefits as a result of the order of reinstatement in service from 1.7.1996 not having been allegedly complied with as per the said order dated 10.4.2003, it would be open to the Petitioner to claim the same in appropriate proceedings. 4. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.