IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17668 of 2002 Between : Mrs.Vanitha Nagesh W/o.Nagesh, R/o.H.No.53, Venkatapuram, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Muncipal Corporaton of Hyderabad Rep.by its Addl.Commissioner S.P.Road, Sec'bad. 2 Smt.A.Lalitha Bai W/o.Late A.Shankar rao R/o.Q.No.5. M.C.H.Quarters, Konda Reddy Tukaram, North Lalaguda, Sec'bad. RR2 is impleaded as per court order in WPMP No.23881/02, dt.4-10- 2002 3 A.Tulsi Bai W/o.Late Purushotham R/o.Q.No.5. M.C.H.Quarters, Konda Reddy Tukaram, North Lalaguda, Sec'bad. RR3 is impleaded as per court order in WPMP No.23881/02, dt.4-10- 2002 4 K.Krishna Rao S/o.Rajanna Ploat No.27, Konda Reddy Nagar, North Lalaguda, Sec'bad. RR4 is impleaded as per court order in WPMP No.23881/02, dt.4-10- 2002 5 Rangoji Narsimha Chary S/o.R.Brchmaiah R/o.5-40, Malkajgiri, R.R.Dist. RR5 is impleaded as per court order in WPMP No.23881/02, dt.4-10- 2002 6 Smt.K.Sakk Bai W/o.late Venkat Swamy R/o.Ploat No.27, Konda Reddy Nagar, North Lalaguda, Sec'bad. RR6 is impleaded as per court order in WPMP No.23881/02, dt.4-10- 2002 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction or order more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not implementing their orders of notice U/s.636 for demolition of the illegal constructions, which was upheld by the lower Court & 1st appellate Court over the property bearing Plot No.6 in Sy.No.180 being old with new Sy.No.216 admeasuring 3822.22 sq.yds., Batkammakunta, Sec'bad as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to take further action pursuant to the above notice. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.K.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER : It is reported by the learned counsel for petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 10th June 2009 ajr