1 dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7799 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.M.Sakhardande i/by Mr.P.H.Dharmadhikari for the petitioner. Mr.Dharam Sharma i/by Mrs.Trupti J. Gohil for respondents 1 to 4. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 01.12.2008 P.C. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order whereby his chamber summons for directing the plaintiff to join him as party to the suit was dismissed. Admittedly the plaintiff’s suit is for injunction against defendant but part of the property in question is now purchased by the petitioner as admittedly no injunction whatsoever against the transfer of the said property. The injunction order, therefore, if any passed or even the 2 relief is claimed only against defendant no.1 the involvement of the property just cannot be overlooked. Therefore, the person who purchased the property through a registered document, I see there is no reason not to allow such application. Taking note of all this, as the petitioner in person interested in the property which is the subject matter of the injunction, this chamber summons as prayed is allowed. In the result, the petition is also allowed. No costs. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks stay of this order. Considering the reason stated above, I see there is no case made out for grant of extension of stay as prayed. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]