1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3292 OF 2010 Eknath s/o Shivram Patil & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Gopinath s/o Shenfadu More & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Application tendered by the claimant / respondent herein seeking restoration of the claim petition which was dismissed for want of prosecution on earlier occasion has been allowed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Jalgaon by order dt. 2-2-2010 and the said order issued by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation is subjected to challenge in this petition at the instance of the employer / petitioner herein. There was delay in approaching the court which was condoned by the court in view of order passed on 9-5-2010. Restoration application was taken up for 2 consideration and the same is allowed. 2 I have perused the impugned order passed by the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation. In exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the instant petition. Petition is devoid of merit hence stands rejected. 3 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp3292.10.odt