IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9699 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 30, 2011. Raj Pal Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Vocational Mistress as per her merit. It is averred that the petitioner's juniors have been given appointment while ignoring her claim. The aforesaid relief has been sought by the petitioner vide representation dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P-5) also but no decision appears to have been taken thereupon so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition and on perusal of the documents on record, however, without expressing any views on the CWP No.9699 of 2011 [2] petitioner's entitlement, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's claim by passing a speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 30, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE