IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26383 of 2011 1. Kari @ Kari Devi, wife of Bandhu Mian 2. Baudhu Mian, son of Karimal Mian Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 06.09.2011 The learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in paragraph one of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 447, 323, 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1) and X of Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribes of Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989. It has been submitted that now the matter has been compromised between the parties and it would be in the interest of justice not to put the petitioner behind the bars in such circumstances. Considering the same, let the petitioners in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 131 of 2008, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A. A. Sahay, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) 2 That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the father/brother of the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)