IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 19TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 4387 of 2007(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- NABEESA BEEVI, W/O.LATE USAF SAHIB, AGED 65 YEARS, NABEESA MAHAL, NO.5 BUILDING, MANGALAMPALAM, VADAKKANCHERRY-II VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPT. OF REVENUE, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD 4. THE TAHSILDAR, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VADAKKANCHERRY-II VILLAGE, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No. 4387 OF 2007-V = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of February, 2007. JUDGMENT Heard. The petitioner has a statutory remedy under the Land Conservancy Act and Rules against the impugned order. She has filed Ext.P4 revision, a statutory one before the competent authority. That revision is dated 29-1-2007. If the petitioner is desirous of obtaining interim order to govern the parties during the pendency of that revision, the District Collector has a necessary authority to do so. Without prejudice to the petitioner taking recourse to such remedy, this writ petition is dismissed. However, in order to enable the petitioner to move any such application for interim relief, the orders impugned in Ext.P4 revision will be kept in abeyance for a period of ten days. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, Sha/- JUDGE.