IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3820 of 2008 SUSHILA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 15.04.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner, she was selected for appointment as Shiksha Mitra and joined on 1.6.2005.This was a contractual appointment for eleven months which would have come to an end on 31.5.2006.That she may not have been wrongly sent for training or respondent no. 8 wrongly intruded and denied her benefits by securing wrong appointment, are issues hardly of any relevance now. After the contractual appointment of the petitioner would have come to an end on 31.5.2006 the right to renewal thereafter was an inchoate right depending on the facts and circumstances on the discretion of the authorities. Renewal of the contract was not a matter of right. The benefit under rule 20 of the Bihar Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Condition Rules 2006 acquiring the status of a Panchayat Shikshak to Shiksha Mitra was available only to those who were working as Shiksha Mitra on 1.7.2006, the date when the Rules came into force. The petitioner was clearly not working as Shiksha Mitra on the date that the Rules came into force and cannot claim to have acquired the status of Panchayat Shikshak. This Court therefore finds no error in the order dated 9.6.2008 of the District Magistrate setting aside the appointment of respondent no. 8 but declining to grant relief to the petitioner. The submission of the Counsel for the petitioner that if the authorities had taken a decision in time certain benefits may have enured to the petitioner, can only be a subject matter of an appropriate proceeding by the petitioner before the competent civil forum but certainly not in a writ application. If the petitioner has discharged any duty as Shiksha Mitra for any period of time obviously she is entitled to her honorarium for the same. If she represents the authorities are required to pay the legitimate dues forth with without any unnecessary delay. There is no merit in this writ application. It is accordingly dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)