IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (MS) NO. 1962 OF 2009 Harish Chandra Joshi and others. ………Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …..Respondents. Present : Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Date of Decision: 20.9.2010 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. 1. Heard learned counsels for both the parties. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the State along with an application for condonation of delay (CLMA No. 7958 of 2010). The reasons stated for delay in filing the counter affidavit appear to be just and bonafide. The Delay Condonation Application (CLMA No. 7958 of 2010) is allowed. Counter affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the bar that this petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the impugned order has been recalled by the concerned Authorities. 4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructous. 5. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.9.2010 Rathour