T IAC-22 TSI -^MM^, ^W^, hwwy. 3TT^T •q=ra? *4|t|CTI Shtll* "^I, 200 I^^I' an^i^ ft-ii'* 3Ilt?l ^ll ^lf^t sn^i'^arWHfei S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DH1REK <^I^I(n<ftTl tiwv\i ^ fs^ <^i^R ^sipgiTsn^i UUAMISUKA.J W.P. (a No.t3049 OF 2008 Writ petitlon under Articjle 226 of the Constitutlon of kdia PETITIONER (anohar Jethani, S/o Late Dr. V^rialdas Jethani, aged about 41 y^ars, R/o Beside Kohinoor Hjotel, Amardeep, Talkies Road, B^ns Tal Raipur, CG, Present aitldress:- Wai-d no.36 Sliiksl-mk )lony, New Khuraipar, BhUal, If.stt. Diirg (CG) VEftSUS RESPONDENTS 20.6.2008 Shri M.K. Baeg, coiinsel| Shri AS Kachhawaha- Dkr State of Chhattisgarh, tlii'ough Secretary, Town Admmistration and Development Departm.ent, DKS Bhawan, Ralpur (CG) The Municipal Corporation througli flie Comniissioner, Munlcipal Corporation, Bhilai, QE Road, Supela, Bhilai, Distt. Dm^,-CG. for the petitioner. f. A.G for the State. [^ifi^ T 311^1 ^I R;-t 3II^?I shHi^ <il?a -F ^SI •<11<<ICT<<, ^Tflti'lS. Riinwy SIR^T "q^? IINCTI •g^^———••——————••——'g^ 200 Iq^I' sn^r^giwafN The State of Madhya Prade (Annexure P/3) had alsi agreeinent with the proposa] <+it'4l<v1'4t'1 ^W^l ^ \€^<T^|'^,K ^? sipgH aii^r Grievance of the petiljioner is that the Spedal Area Development Aufhority, Diufe had prepared a rehabilitation scheme for settlement of l^nd uader "Naya Khursipar Ke Awasiya/Vyavsyik Bhufchan|do Ke Vyavasthapan Ki Yojna'. sh vide memo dated 24.9.1998 } directed the Collector & Adminlstrator; Munlcipal Co^poration, Bhilal tiiat they are in submitted by the Special Area Development Authority and pie vacant land may be allotted under the afor^aid scheme s^s per rules and temis prescribed by the Authority for aUotmenp: ofhouse/land on fhe approved rate and "Srst come, first sented" basis. The petitioner submttt' P/5 before the Municipal sd his appUcation of Annexure Corporation, Bhilal/respondent 11 No.2 for allotment of land iilnder the aforesaid scheme. He has also submltted remtnd^rs to fhe respondents in fhls regard. However, no deci^ may be disposed of with a ion has been taken by fhe respondents on his applicatic|n. He submits that thls petition dtrection to the respondents to decide his application of An^iexure P/3 in accordance with law. 's ['qt^'^RsT^ ;C-22 SD^T^T^ Wi^i SD^T ?t)*?Ni •Hf^d ^ vr~ ^_ZSSS^^^^3Si/ -h •^g ^||<||(»|^, ^tflti'l^. filfll'H'it sn^r TR^ 111CTI ShHiqi "WI, 200 I^^T' sn^i'reiwafet Shri Kachhawaha, State has no objection if th aforesaid direction. lebrned the Munlcipal Corporatioii, the grievances, which are copy of this petition, who, expeditiously, preferably wll *i'i|f<')<il-l 'qPRff 4 fS'Si' <FSI($K ^'3lf:OT 311^1 Dy AG appearmg for fhe le petition is disposed of with the Accordtngly, the inst^nt petition is disposed of with Uberty to the petitioner to mjake sultable representation before BhUal/respondent No. 2 raising •alsed in this petition, aloiigwith ta tum, shaU decide the same a penod of six months the date of receipt of t|he representation, so filed, in accordance wifh law. | ' ~^d7- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [T^ife4