IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 643 of 2011 Kushal Pal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr.R.C.Dahiya, Advocate. Mr.Rishi Pal Rana, Advocate. **** RANJIT SINGH J. Petitioners have prayed that directions be issued to the respondents not to cause hindrance in transport of minor mineral by customers, men and agents of the petitioners. In support, the petitioners have placed reliance on some direction of this nature issued by this court. It would not be very apt to issue such general directions to apply in all cases of movement of minor minerals. This court may have issued some such directions earlier through Anneuxres P-3 and P-4, but I am not inclined to adopt the said course. For any court to interfere, a person may have to show a specific grievance. The court is being asked to issue direction without disclosing any violation of law. In case there is no specific averment of stopping of any particular vehicle, which is in violation of any law, the petitioner would be at liberty to take any action in accordance with law. It would not be appropriate for issuing any such direction generally which can lead to misuse. It is to be seen if writ would be an appropriate legal remedy, if any vehicle is intercepted illegally or otherwise. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. January 25, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE