:v L/ 'lif” C EN THE ma! 992133.9§_<2§§Am3§a¥z§.é2‘.§£§é5m mg». M1: petition No. g5$ C6 2002 Petitiener -— P. Janki Ramhandra Rae Age§ about 30 year S/ Late Shri P.?a1dayya Suryekanta Nivas‘ Gandhinaga ' r. Kosanaga Bhi fl Tah. 5: D1stt.Durg (c.s.) . u . P. . A (1) Chairman Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board. n shakti Bhawa, Rampur JABALPUR (M.P.) . 1%; ‘ (2) chairman Chhattisgarh State Electrmity Board. Dangania.‘ RAIPUR. Executive Engineer Workshop Eivision, ChhattiSgarh State Electricity Beard. Bhilai-B. Burg. ( Through Respo ént No. 2) . PETITIeNER UNDER ARTIaJ: 225/227 OF THE CONSTI'mTIoN OF IBDIA mR TI-m ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAKUS OR CERTIQRARY OR PRQHIBATION AM) OR WIT OF ANY GTHER NATURE AND/0R ORDER OR DIRECTION. The petitiener named above, most humbly and respectfully submits as below :- (1) bart’iéulafs'bf petitioner :- ’ As mentioned in the cause title. V s. o /\ w. lg /) r. lai. 26‘s ‘2004 Shré R. M. Pandey, counsei fai' the petiticmer. ‘ Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Pane! Lawyer for respondent No.3. Heard both the counsei. Thé petitioner has preferred this writ petition undeyé’mdee 226/227 of the Censtitutien ef lrrdia whereby the petitioner has prayed fer directing the respondents ta ceneider and appoint the petitiener en compassionate ground. The petitioner’s case is that ris father was working as. Attendant Gradeaii in the workshop of respondent No.3 and histather whiie sewing under respondent No.3 hed expi‘ ed on . 15-10-98 due to itinese. The petitioner had submitted an application for appointment on oompassionate ground before resp ndent No.1. But, reepondent Not has not taken any action on the appi cation of the petitioner and kept the appiieation pending for a tong time On tee—2002, the petitioner again submitted an appiication for appo ntment on oompaseionate ground before respondent No.3, but respon ent No.3 did net give any positive repiy. Learned counsel for the petiti ner submitted that respondent No.2 has issued appointment orders in ‘respect of 31 persons on compassionate ground, Counse! f rther submitted that the petitioner may beraiiowied to make arepres ntation to respondents 1 & 2 and respondents 1 a 2 may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner to which the iearned cc nsei tor respondent No.3 has no objection. XI~HC—22 mumrm 1:1 200 ma ‘ j may: WHFEE mmWW WW Wu“. ésaqfzmm , mmwafga Haa—‘mg heard the learned co nsei for the parzies and having re§aw i0 the facts ané circumtan s ef the case, the petiticner is akwed te make a detaiied represen ation raising a£! his grievames to fespendexm 1&2 Within a perioci ef 1O daysfrom today and in tum, mspondents 1&2 Wm decide the repr entatien 9f the petitierier wighin a peried of 30 daye frem the date f feceipt ef the repres’entatien eensiderihg aii the grievances of the etitiener amt wiii passe reasoned erdet. in View of this ereier. LA. No.96 0/2003 stands siispesed of. With the aferesaid directions, th s writ petition is disposed of. Parties are entitied for certitied opy of’t‘his order.