BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17412 of 2011 B.ABIRAHAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.7 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABBING CELL CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO. 67 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.A.DHANA ARAVINDA BALAJI Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 420, 468 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.67 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. He has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.V.A.Dhana Aravinda Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the de-facto complainant has purchased the land from one Puli Mohamed Mathar, who is the father of the accused Nos. 1 to 5. In the meantime, the accused Nos. 1 to 5 executed a power of attorney to petitioner/accused. After that the said land was sold to A-8 and A-9. The accused No. 6 was working in petitioner/accused, who sale apparels company as a Manager. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not committed any crime as stated in the complaint. He would submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that he is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that due to property dispute, the petitioner has been implicated. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner. 6. In view of the above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders for the purpose of interrogation. 8. The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. V.A.DHANA ARAVINDA BALAJI Advocate SR.No.46183 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17412 of 2011 Date :28/12/2011 RJ/29.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/