IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18798 of 2009 SHAMBHU SINGH, son of Sri Ramashish Singh, resident of village, Ram Chandrapur, P. S.- Piparia, District- Lakhisarai… Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 30.06.2010 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned AAG-III for the State. Pursuant to earlier orders of this Court dated 29.7.2009, 15.9.2009, 18.9.2009 and 6.10.2009 an affidavit has been filed today by the Director, Incharge of the Police Laboratory, CID, Bihar Patna wherein it has been stated that now there is no case pending out of 173 cases as noted in the earlier order of this Court dated 6.10.2009. Now that this zero level has been achieved by the Director of Police Laboratory, this Court would direct that in no view of the matter any report would remain pending with the laboratory for a period of more than four weeks. In other words, it would be the personal obligation of the Director of the Laboratory to ensure that each and every report is sent positively within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of submission and/or 2 requisition. In the event, it is found and/or reported to this Court that the required report has not been submitted by the Laboratory within the aforementioned period of four weeks, the Director In Charge or the Director whosoever may be in the office will be personally hauled for contempt of this Court. In the event, there would be any impediment obstructing submission of report of Laboratory within the aforementioned four weeks it shall immediately report requisitioning officer for delay as also the period that is likely to be consumed in submission of the report. In view of the fact that the report relating to the petitioner has been submitted and the trial of the petitioner which was being delayed on account of receipt of the report must have made progress. Trial Court is accordingly directed to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is now taken up on day to day basis and is concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. At this stage Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha presses an interlocutory application on behalf of Mr. Shani Ansari. This Court fails to understand under which 3 capacity Mr. Shani Ansari can be allowed to intervene in a case relating to grant of bail to the petitioner. His grievance as with regard to adequate personal or lack of qualification of the authorities holding post of experts in the laboratory cannot be made subject matter of this bail application. This case is not a Public Interest Litigation wherein any one can claim any thing. In fact it would appear to this Court that Mr. Shani Ansari has got some personal grudge and that is how he has also sought intervention in this case. Consequently, the prayer for his intervention is hereby rejected. With the aforesaid observation and direction this application is disposed of. Let a copy of this order be handed over to Mr. Lalit Kishore, A.A.G.-III for being transmitted to all concerned for its strict compliance. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)