" "lls&'' :1' ^~% y;".^' ^ & ''---^k 'l '^^3 SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. SHRS N.K. AQARWAL, J. Claimants 1. Rekha widow of late Shri Bharat Sahu, aged about 30 years; 2. Harshad son of late Shri Bharat Sahu, aged about 12 yeaf's; 3. Navin Kumar son of late Shri Bharat Sahu, aged about 10 years; 4. Vasu son of late Shri Bharat Sahu, aged about 08 years; The appellants No. 2 to 4 are minor, through their naturat guardian mother Rekha widow of late Shri Bharat Sahu. 5. Nirmala Bai wife of Shri Bhuneshwar Ram Sahu, aged about 56 years; 6. Bhuneshwar Ram Sahu son of late Bhukhau Ram Sahu, aged about 58 All residents of Banspara ward Dhamtari, tahsil and district Dhamtari C.G. Vijay Kumar son of Shri Bhupendra Singh Dhurw, resident of village Moradev, Police Station City Kotwali, Dhamtari, Tahsii and district Dhamtari C.G. Tukaram Sahare, aged about 32 years resident of viliage Khadapari, Tahsii Lanji, district Balaghat M.P. (Driver of offending vehicle bearing No. C.G.05/Z.G./1795) 1 .-.\ 2 Premlal @ Prem Kumar son of Shri Ramesh Kumar Sahu, resident of Jodhapur Sarid Ward, Dhamtari, Tahsli and District Dhamtari C.G. (Registered owner of offending vehicle bearing No. C.G. 05/Z.G./1795) 3 The Oriental Insurance Limited, through the Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, behind of Amar Talkies, Dhamtari C.G. (insurer of offending vehicle bearing NO.C.G.05/Z.G./1795) Miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 ofthe IVIotor Vehscles Act Present : Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel forthe appellants. Shri Sudhir Agrawal, counsel for respondent No.3. ith The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by C.J. Shri P.P. Sahu, learned counsel for the appellants, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appellants/claimants for enhancement of the compensatlon awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhamtari vide award dated 13.12.2006 passed In Ciaim Case No.54/2006. 2) Permissiongranted. 3) The appeai, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Shri Sudhir Agrawal, tearned counsel for respondent No.3 the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, in view of the fact that the appea! has been dismissed as withdrawn, seeks permission to withdraw the cross-objections filed on behalf of respondent No.3. 5) Permission granted. 6) The cross-objections, therefore, are also dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge nimmi 1