IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.916 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 12, 2011 Dharampal .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Challenge in this revision petition is to order of charge and chargesheet dated 8.12.2006. The petition has been filed after a delay of 1506 days. 2. On a query of the Court, the Court has been informed that some prosecution witnesses have already been examined. 3. In view of the extent of delay and the fact that some prosecution witnesses have already been examined, no ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. 4. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 12, 2011 JUDGE avin Crl. Misc. No. M- of 2008 [2] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?