IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34812 of 2010 ARJUN PRASAD SAH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 10.11.2010. Heard. Regard being had to the facts of the case and the allegations, the absurdity pointed out by the learned counsel by drawing the attention of the court to the allegation contained in paragraph-14, does not appear sufficient to quash the summoning order in respect of the two petitioners. However, it would not be meaningless if the S.D.J.M., Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No.390 of 2009 refers the part of the case or the whole of it to the conciliators who have duly been enlisted under the District Legal Services Authority, Gaya, after issuing notices to the complainant of the case so that an effort is made by the conciliation committee on reconciliation and resolution of the matter. The S.D.J.M. should give sufficient opportunity and time to the conciliation committee for making efforts and achieving a result. The petition stands disposed of with the above directions. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)