IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.550 of 2009 MAHADEO TANTI S/O LATE BORHAN TANTI --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KARUNA DEVI W/O MAHADEO TANTI --- OPP. PARTIES. For the petitioner : Mr. Achal Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar no.1, Advocate. ----------- 02 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 21.01.2009 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui in Maintenance case no. 37M/2005 whereby on a consideration of the materials brought on record it has been found that a sum of Rs. 400/- (Four hundred) per month payable from the date of order would be appropriate amount of maintenance payable to the wife for her maintenance as also maintenance of daughter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to a panchayati the petitioner had already executed six kathas of land in favour of the wife for her maintenance. It appears keeping that aspect in mind learned trial Court has fixed meager amount by way of maintenance. This Court does not find any patent illegality meriting interference. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)