1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5514 OF 2009 Dawood Khan Ali Khan. ... .. ..Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... ..Respondents Mr. A. P. Steenson i/by M/s. A.P.Steenson & Associates for the Petitioner. Smt. M. P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1. CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 5, 2010. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This Writ Petition is directed against the order of attachment of deposit accounts dated 4-3-2009. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the respondent Bank has failed to take into consideration the provisions of Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is contended that the order of attachment is contrary to the procedure contemplated under Section 60 of the Code. Considered the contentions canvassed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order of attachment of deposit account. The order impugned was passed in view of 2 award dated 25-8-2008 passed by the Arbitrator. The outstanding liability of the amount mentioned in the order of attachment has not been disputed. It is also no where mentioned in the order of attachment that the salary of the petitioner is the subject of the attachment. In that view of the matter, the order of attachment, in our view, is not in any way violative of the provisions of Section 60(i) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 3. Hence, no case is made out for showing any indulgence. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (D. D. SINHA, J.) ( A. A. SAYED, J.)