PETITIONEKS COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (81 No. 6364 of 2007 1 Rambilas Dhurve aged 38 years Son of Bedram Dhurye, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Prmiaiy Sehool, Bharkatola Block & Distt. Rajnaadgaon 2 Human Kumar Paikara aged 38 years son of Kalyanji Paikara, Assistaat Teacher, Pnmary School, Palaudur Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 Lalchand Kosare scged 38 years Son of Chherku Kosare, Assistaat Teacher, Govt. Pruuaty School, Khamhardeeh Block Khairagarh, District Rajuaadgaon RESPONDBNTS yersus The State Govermnent of Chliattishgarh, Through fhe Secretary, School Education Departraent, D.K.S. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) The Distnct Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, couiisel for the petitioners. Shri Pradeep Singh, Paucl Lawyer for fhe State on advaace copy. ^ (31.10.2007} Heard on adniission, Leamed coiinsel for fhe petitioners subuuts that the petitioners have passed B.Ed. exauiination on fheir own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two advajace iacrenients accordiag to circulars dated 24,12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also submits fhat in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in tenns offhe order passed m fhe case of Ydshwant Kunwr Bhtiratlweif Vs. ^auniciptil W.P.(S)No. 6364/2007 2^ CorpprccKon, 0urg cmci arwther}SQ06 {S MPJR-WS 96!. He submits fhat fhe case of the petitioners is squarely covered by fhe said judgxuent. This legal position is not disputed by fhe learaed couasel for fhe State. However, he subiuits that the order inay be passed ia tenas of fhe said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to vert&eation regardia^ petitioners' such quaUfication. Acconlingly, this writ petitiou is aUowed in tenns of the order passed ia case of Ycishwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Murucipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired B.Ed. Exainiiiation Certificate on their owit expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01,03.1999 and furfher whether they have been paid two advance uicrements or uot. The petitioa staads finaBy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti