1 APL 770.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 770 OF 2011 Mr. Krishnamurthy Iyer & Anr. ... Applicants. V/s. Mrs. Yogita Satish Iyer & Anr. ... Respondents. Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy for the Applicants. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP for the State. Mr. S.G. Shirsat for Respondent 1. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 14th SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the parties extensively. 2. The Applicants claim quashing/deleting their names in a prosecution initiated by Smt. Yogita S. Iyer pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 27th Court at Mulund, Mumbai initiated under the Protection of Women Domestic Violence Act (for short D.V. Act). 3. Apparently and admittedly, the Applicant No.1 is employed stays at Goregaon, is husband’s maternal uncle while Applicant No.2 stays at Borivali. She is husband's maternal aunt. Smt. Yogita’s allegations against these two Applicants reflect in paragraphs 5 and 7 of the Petition. These 2 APL 770.11.sxw are general statement. She says, at the time of ring ceremony, the husband was instigated to make demand from parents of Smt. Yogita. Considering all the aspects and scope of D.V. Act, it cannot be said that present two Applicants will be attracting infraction of Domestic Violence Act as per Smt. Yogita. The allegations even it taken to its logical end will seldom accelerate the prosecution. No relief is prayed nor could be granted against the Applicants. Hence, there is no sufficient material. The proceedings so far as the present Applicants is concerned, is quashed. The Application is allowed qua the Applicants. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)