1 ao1372-10 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1372 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 OF 2011 Smt. Surekha S. Patil & Ors. .. Appellants V/s. M/s. Rainbow Ink & Varnish & Anr. .. Respondents ...... Mr. S. D. Patil for the appellants. ...... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 3, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants. By the impugned order, the learned trial Judge has declined to grant equitable and discretionary relief of temporary injunction. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, I have find that there is no perversity in the approach of the trial Judge. The appellants have a remedy under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, which is the prima facie finding recorded by the learned trial Judge. 2 ao1372-10 2. Hence, no case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed. 3. All contentions of the appellants are kept open which is decided independently on the impugned order. 4. Hearing of the suit is expedited. 5. Civil Application No.56 of 2011 does not survive and the same is disposed of. JUDGE