1M COUKTW itioner ^espondents :?--/ /s\ 1^1, ¥¥.r. i^^ r VsrSuS • Narmadu Chandra, S/'o Shrl Lakhan Lal Chandra, Agsd obout 46 years Assistant Teacher 6ovt. Primary School Suloni Block ,i-, M/f+A ft^-,:-.,-ts-Li f/o ^ "j ?Qr<2ng<im UISTT. KCsiyQrfi [o.c'.j 1. State .of Chhattisgwh Throinh;- Secretary Education &epartmen+, &.K.S. Bhawan, (c.e.) 2. The Director, Public instruction, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 3. Joint C>i"ector, Public Instruction Mvision, Roigarh (C.S.) 4. Oistnct Eyucation Officer Dlstt. iaigarh [C.©.] 5. Education Officer Btock SQ^fiQurh Di^tt. Rotgorh [C.6.] SB;Hon'bieAii'..Justice5fltish K. J ^- Present; AAr. Sonjoy Patel, ^dvocate for the pstitioner. Mr. Vlnay Pandey, Lowyei* for.State/respondsnts. O R_D ER (Passedon this 19ta Day of March, 2007) 1. The petitioner ww appointed v'ide ordei' 30,01.1989 as Assistont Teacher un fixed pay of Rs, 300/'-. ,4fter. completion of one probatfon, he granfed i-egula" pay' scaie of Rs. 975-16TO/-. 2. Learned couTiSs' appearing for- fhe petitione" suhmits that the involved In the is whethe", ths petitioner is entitted to "egu'ar pay 3ca!e w.e.f. the of snitial or from the date of coniptetion of pr^batic-rt p€ri<1^; 3. The imolved, herein by the F ^dministrative Tribunol, in O.A. No. 2745/89 md 56 others Vs. State of A-'i.," A others), it w.'as that t'le siraiiaply situated teachers are entiti'ed to regui'ar pay w.e.f. the of initi<aj The motter was tuken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Leave Petition (Civi') No. 6892/93. Ttie soid tition was cismissed by The Hon b!e Suf Cour-t tl" decision of the Trjbunal to the effect the Teachers/Assistant Teachers ar'e entitled tc- pq." fr'om date of initial appojntment. . 4, fo" the petitione" further- that this Court, w'hije considering the same in Sushil Tiwari & Vs. ^4'^A-^ ^.".s?A ,^ f^^^'1-^^^^-^ X ^A,fc.,^£-;.j? A*J D /^x KU ^O^^ A-? ?f^4^ 3T^T€ 6?OVT. OT <-riri^TTISgQf~H d OTri€E'SS {W,'Ff. t^S) NQ. Dy^Q OT £,^A/Q) Dy orde" 7-11-2006, has grmted regui'ar puy w.e.f. the of initial flppointment. 5. Lscrned counsel for the porttes jointly submit that this 'is covered by the of this Court in ths of Sushil Tiwari A others Vs. State 6ovt. c-f Chhattisgarfi <S (Supra). 6. In view of that thls petition in fhe terms. No or-der as to costs. Sd/- .. Satish K.Agnihotri . Judge ,./ • Subhssh