IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1682 of 2008 SRI BIHARI SAH & ORS Versus SRI BANARSI RAM & ORS ----------- 2 1.10.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, when it was specific case of the plaintiffs-petitioners in the Court below that such settlement by ex-landlord was made in the year 1340 and such averment was not made only in the plaint but the plaintiff no. 3 had also asserted the fact in his deposition in paragraph no. 5, there was no question of allowing amendment of the year from 1340 to 1348, which would in fact take away the admission of the plaintiffs causing grave prejudice to the defendants- opposite parties. Moreover, such amendment in plaint could not have been allowed at the appellate stage to upset a findings recorded by the Trial Court while dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-petitioners. That being so, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)