IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.14 of 2011 IMTEYAZ AHMAD, SON OF ABDUL QUAYUM @ ABDUL QUYAM KHURSHID, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – PAHARPUR, P.O. BIHULI, P.S. SAKRA, DISTRICT – MUZAFFARPUR AT PRESENT MOHALLA JAKARIYA COLONY P.O. RAMNA, P.S. KAZI MOHAMMADPUR,DISTRICT–MUZAFFARPUR. ………….. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE CITY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TOWN, MUZAFFARPUR. 8. THE OFFICER INCHARGE TOWN POLICE STATION, MUZAFFARPUR. 9. MONAZIR IMAM MALIK, SON OF HAKIM ABDUL MALIK 10. MANAZAR IMAM MALIK, SON OF HAKIM ABDUL MALIK 11. SALAMNA MALIK SON OF MONAZIR IMAM MALIK ALL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – CHANDWARA BINDESHWARI COMPOUND, P.S. MUZAFFARPUR TOWN, DISTRICT – MUZAFFARPUR. 12. TARIQUE IMAM, SON OF NOT KNOWN 13. SHARIQUE IMAM, SON OF NOT KNOWN BOTH RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – BANKE SAH CHOWK, P.S. MUZAFFARPUR TOWN, DISTRICT – MUZAFFARPUR. ……… RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 06.01.2011 Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is for production of his wife Bushra Fatma by releasing her from the confinement of her parents. Petitioner claims to be the husband of Bushra Fatma, with whom in presence of Moulvi Nikah was performed. Petitioner also claims that after remaining as husband and wife for sometime his wife went to meet her parents and thereafter she is not allowed by her parents to come and live with this petitioner as husband and wife. Considering the statement in the writ application, we do not find that any application for issuance of writ of 2 habeas corpus is maintainable. The legally wedded wife of the petitioner, if has preferred to live with her parents or she is not being allowed to come and live with the petitioner, he has remedy available by filing his application before the Principal Judge, Family Court of the District. This Court cannot assume jurisdiction of the Family Court, since the matter relates to the restitution of conjugal rights. This application is disposed of. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.) (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)