IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2006 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 R.P.No.1120 of 2006 IN W.A.NO.2108 OF 2000 --------------------------------------------------------- (JUDGEMENT IN W.A.NO.2108/2000 DATED 10/11/2006) .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT:- --------------------------------------- ELAMGULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3576, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, KOORALI P.O., PONKUNNAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.RENJITH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------------------ 1. M.GOPINATHAN NAIR, MULAMKUNNATH URUMPIL, KOORALI P.O., PONKUNNAM. 2. GEOGI JOSE, KUZHIPPALLIL, NISSI BHAVAN, KOORALI P.O., PONKUNNAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE ADMINISTRATOR, ELAMGULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.3576, KOORALI P.O., PONKUNNAM. R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.B.HOOD. ADV.SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.Bali,C.J. & S.Siri Jagan,J. ------------------------------------- R.P.No.1120 of 2006 in W.A.No.2108 of 2000-A ------------------------------------- Dated, this the 19th day of December, 2006 ORDER Siri Jagan,J. (Oral) In the judgment in the Writ Appeal we had directed the Administrator to continue the proceedings initiated against respondents 1 and 2 by Exhibit P3 and identical notice by giving time to respondents 1 and 2 to furnish their comments on the enquiry report and taking the disciplinary proceedings to its logical ends as expeditiously as possible. However, the learned counsel submits that pursuant to the earlier interim orders passed in this Writ Appeal, the process of giving opportunity to the petitioner to file objections is already over and what is left is only to pass final orders in the matter. Accordingly, we clarify that those of the procedure which have RP.1120 of 2006 in WA..2108 of 2000 - 2 - already been completed in respect of the disciplinary proceedings would stand and the further proceedings need only be completed in compliance with our judgment in the Writ Appeal.. With the above clarification, this review petition is disposed of. V.K.Bali Chief Justice S.Siri Jagan Judge vku/-