IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2008 MR. AJIT YESHWANT NAIK ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. SHAM PANDURANG KAVLEKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V. S. Parab, Advocate for respondent No.1. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE, J. Date:- 31st January, 2008 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This revision is directed against an order of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned Counsel for the parties, at the outset, submitted that the parties have amicably compounded the offence and placed on record the consent terms, duly signed by the parties and the Advocates on record. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 2. In view of the consent terms, the petitioner and respondent No.1 are allowed to compound the offence as provided for under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As a result thereof, the sentence awarded by the Court below is quashed and set aside. C.C. expedited. Revision is disposed of. D. B. BHOSALE, J. ssm.