IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6918 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6920 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 90 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 90 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 90 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6919 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4107 OF 2005 Bipin R. Mehta.... Applicant versus Baliram Bapu Patil & anr....... Respondent. Mr,. Sachin Dhakephalkar for the applicant. Mr. P.P.Shinde APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 25TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED; 25TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED; 25TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Despite service, none appears for the respondent no.1. These are the applications for restoration of applications, which came to be dismissed for non prosecution, on account of absence of counsel on 29-11-2006. The reason set out for justifying the absence of the counsel is stated in para 11 of the appalication. It is stated that the advocate for the applicant did not appear in the court as he had met with an accident on 15-11-2006 and the doctor had advised him to take bed rest for a period of three months. Having regard to the reason set out for the absence of the counsel, the present applications are allowed. The order dated 29-11-2006 is set aside. Criminal Applications arestored to file.