CRM-M No. 35665 of 2011 **** Banti v. State of Haryna Present: Mr. Arvind Singh , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Choudhary, AAG, Haryana. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 95 dated 26.09.2010, under Sections 136, 137 Electricity Act, registered at Police Station Babain, District Kurukshetra. The allegation in the present FIR is that the petitioner and his co-accused were instrumental in stealing 47 Kilogams of copper coil. On the last date the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is sought to be implicate on the basis of disclosure statement.” Today learned AAG, on instructions from HC Ranbir Singh, has informed the Court that apart from this FIR there is another FIR of the same nature pending against the petitioner and, therefore, the argument that the petitioner was implicated on the disclosure statement would lose its effect. In my considered opinion the present case does not warrant grant of anticipatory bail tot he petitioner. Dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE December 15, 2011 sunita