ASN 1 WP-329.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.329 OF 2010 Kshitij R. Vyas. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Mukesh Vashi i/by M.P.Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner. Mr.H.V.Mehta, Advocate with Ashok Verma and A.,M.Sethna Advocate for Respondent No.3 Union of India. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. AND SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. 18 August 2011 PC: In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 6 of the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission Rules, 2000. The petitioner has also prayed for direction to the State of Maharashtra to take necessary steps so that the leave travel concession benefit/vacation is made available to the Chair person of the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission which are available to the sitting Chief Justice of Bombay High Court. The petitioner is presently the Chair person of the Maharashtra Human Rights Commission. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with a view to pursue the ASN 2 WP-329.sxw representations already made to the State Government pointing out the inconsistency between Rule 4(1) and Rule 10 of the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission Rules, 2000 and Rule 6 of the said rules on the other hand. 3 Leave, as prayed for, is granted. 4 The petitioner has already made representations on the subject matter of this petition to the State Government. The petition is sdpermitted to be withdrawn and the State Government shall consider and decide the said representations as expeditiously as possible and preferably within two months from the date of receipt of this order. CHIEF JUSTICE SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.