IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 100 of 2010 Dr. Govind Ballabh Punetha ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another .………. Respondents. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate with Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. Date of Judgment: 09.06.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, states that there are certain technical defects in the instant writ petition, and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action, after removing the technical defects. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 09.06.2010 09.06.2010 Amit