IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23062 of 2010 MEENA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 07.10.2010 Heard. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner along with two others was earlier heard by a Bench of this Court and it was rejected vide order dated 17.12.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39418 of 2009 under the following order. “The petitioners are family members of the husband. The allegations are under Section 304-B of the Penal Code. Whether it be under Section 306 or 304-B of the Penal Code is hardly relevant at this stage. Any plea of alibi on behalf of the petitioner no.1 will be considered more appropriately in an application for regular bail. The application is rejected”. The present petitioner no.1 in the aforesaid Cr. Misc. No. 39481 of 2005, I find no fresh ground to take a different view. Accordingly, prayer is refused. (C. M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-