IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15097 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 24, 2010. Suman Devi .....Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the merit list dated 9.8.2010 (Annexure P-18) prepared by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, whereby respondent No.5 has been placed above the petitioner for allotment of the retail outlet dealership at Kaithal City. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that certain factual assertions made by the petitioner would require consideration by the respondent-Corporation. As per the policy decision of the Oil Companies, which is invariably referred to by them in several cases, an aggrieved applicant can submit objections against preparation of the merit list, which are disposed of before the LOI is issued in favour of the selected candidate. C.W.P.No .15097 of 2010 2 The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to submit her objections within a period of one week which shall be considered by the respondent-Corporation in accordance with law/policy at the earliest. Till the objections are disposed of by passing a speaking order, no LOI shall be issued to anyone in relation to the subject-Retail outlet. Dasti. August 24, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE