IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2006 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1928 WA.No. 1926 of 2006() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.32321/2001 Dated 11/08/2006 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER ---------------------------- SARADA R. MENON, W/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNA MENON, MANIKKATH HOUSE, RAVIPURAM ROAD, COCHIN-16. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN SMT.SHAHNA KARTHIKEYAN RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT -------------------------------- ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER WORKS SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PALLIMUKKU, COCHIN-16. BY STANDING COUNSEL MR.M.DINESH THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K. BALI, C.J. & S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------- W.A.No.1926 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of November, 2006 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J.(Oral) This writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 11th August, 2006 recorded in O.P.No.32321 of 2001-W. The dispute with regard to water charges pertains to two meters. With regard to one meter the direction given by the learned Single Judge reads as follows: “3. So, the respondent herein is directed to take a fresh decision on the average consumption for the above said period and issue a fresh bill to the petitioner for the connection, KC.39/2735/ND.” The direction with regard to the other meter is contained in paragraph 4 of the judgment. Learned counsel appearing for the parties are ad idem that the direction as reproduced above be also made applicable to the second meter, direction regarding W.A.No.1926/2006 2 which has been given in paragraph 4 of the impugned judgment. Ordered accordingly. Writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. V.K. BALI, CHIEF JUSTICE. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. vns