1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1234 of 2005 Shri Narayan Ramu Wandre, .. Petitioner Vs Sou Kamla Narayan Wandre and ors.. Respondents Mr D.B.Patil, for the petitioner. Mr R.Y.Mirza, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 20th July, 2006 DATED : 20th July, 2006 DATED : 20th July, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard Mr Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Mirza, learned APP for the respondent. 2. This petition is directed against the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below in the proceedings arising from an application under section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the respondent-wife. The trial Court, after taking into consideration that the petitioner has irrigated land and earns income of Rs.20,000/- per year and that he was working in the sugar factory since 1979, allowed the application and granted maintenance of Rs.600/- per month to the respondent-wife. In revision, that amount is reduced to Rs.400/- by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj. I perused both the judgments. Keeping in view the discussion in the 2 2 2 judgments of the trial Court as also of the revisional court, the amount awarded by way of monthly maintenance is absolutely meagre. No ground whatsoever is made out to interfere with such order. That was the minimum amount which the Court chould have granted to the respondent-wife. I find no reason or ground to interfere with such order. Hence, the application is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)