THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2156 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed this revision under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 {“the Act” for brevity}, inter alia, seeking to assail the judgment dated 18.03.2009 in R.A.No.101 of 2007 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, in dismissing the appeal and confirming the order dated 16.03.2007 passed in R.C.No.325 of 2002 on the file of the II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, allowing the petition filed under Sections 10 (2) (v) and 10 (20 (iii) of the Act. Initially, the landlord approached the Rent Controller on the grounds that the tenant committed acts of waste and secured alternative accommodation and hence, sought for eviction. Both the Courts below found favour with the request of the landlord and ordered eviction. On a perusal of the material available on record and appreciating the submissions made across the bar, it is seen that the said finding is purely concurrent and based on the evidence and the ultimate conclusions as arrived at. Hence, I find no warrant to interfere with the orders of both the Courts below and there are no merits in the revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall vacate the premises within a period of six {6} months from today. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 3rd February 2011 RRB