1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5527 OF 2010 (Sau. Meenatai Shyam Futane vs. The Divisional Commissioner & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 24, 2010. Shri Bapat, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that service of notice of no confidence motion upon the petitioner has been erroneously held to be valid. The refusal recorded there is by a minor. Shri Fulzele, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3 and Shri Dhage, learned counsel for respondents No. 4 to 19 support the impugned order. They urged that there is nothing on record to show that any adult male member was available and hence even if it is presumed that there is no refusal by minor, still pasting of notice on residence of the petitioner is in accordance with provisions of Rule 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat (Meeting) Rules. The position is considered by the appellate authority. I find that the petitioner has not come with a specific defence that some adult male member was available for accepting service or then with a defence that her minor son never refused to accept the notice. 2 No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.