IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 28785 of 2009 Date of decision: 06.08.2010 Bhag Singh and another ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Ms Simranjeet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent - State Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is contended by the learned counsel for respondent No. 2 that the petitioners have since been convicted by the trial Court vide judgement dated 12.07.2010 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhuri. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 06, 2010 mohan