IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 8032 of 2009 Date of Decision: July 6, 2009 Diya Enterprises ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the goods have been released. However, he has requested that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to pursue their remedy in accordance with law. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner shall be entitled to pursue their remedy available under law. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JASWANT SINGH) July 6, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor 2