THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.732 of 2009 (Dated : 27-12-2010) Between: Dr.(Miss) Sepuri Madhuri Maharanipet, Visakhapatnam ….Petitioner A n d Prof. C. Venugopal Rao, Registrar and others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.732 of 2009 ORDER: This contempt case has been filed complaining disobedience of the order dated 24th September 2008 passed in Writ Petition No.16657 of 2008. 2. Prof C. Venugopal Rao, Registrar, Dr.N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh-1st respondent appeared in person. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-University. 4. Sri D.V.Nagarjuna Babu, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-University placed on record a copy of the order passed by the Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.(s).29959 of 2008, dated 10.12.2010. The relevant portion of the order of the Supreme Court reads as hereunder:- “The impugned order of the High Court is totally unsustainable. Seats in professional colleges cannot be created by a judicial fiat save in exceptional and rare circumstances. The fact remains that the first respondent is prosecuting her studies ever since the beginning of the academic year and the course itself is coming to an end in July, 2011. In the circumstances, it may not be possible at this stage to displace the 1st respondent and direct the admission of the second respondent into the course. In somewhat similar situation, this Court in Civil Appeal No.4056 of 2004 dated 12th July, 2004 directed that appropriate admission should be granted for the next academic year without any further counseling within the permissible intake limit. We accordingly, direct that the second respondent herein should be granted admission for the academic year 2011-2012 without any further counseling within the permissible intake limit. There shall be an order accordingly. The appeal is accordingly allowed”. 5. In view of the above-referred order passed by the Supreme Court of India, nothing survives for adjudication in this contempt case. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt case is dismissed as redundant. No costs. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.27-12-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.732 of 2009 (Dated : 27-12-2010)