1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.13280 of 2011 1.Namachivayam 2.Naveenatham 3.Subhasini 4.Rajesh ... Petitioners/Respondents Vs Gowri @ Rajeshwari ... Respondent/Petitioner This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to call for the records relating to the petition in M.C.No.13 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.III, Trichy and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner :Mr.M.Vijay Karthikeyan for M/s.M.Ajmal Khan and R.Gandhi For Respondent :Mr.Kandasamy Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER Seeking to quash the proceedings pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Trichy in M.C.No.13 of 2011, the petitioners who were the respondents have come up with the present petition. 2.The respondent herein has filed the above case seeking certain orders provided under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The learned Magistrate has entertained the same and issued summons to the petitioners and on service of summons, the petitioners appeared before the Court. 3.On perusal of this petition would go to show that the petitioners raised only four grounds. According to them, the first ground is that entire allegations in the petition do not make out any case for entertaining the petition. But the facts are contrary. There are sufficient allegations found in the petition. Therefore the first ground is liable to be rejected. The second ground is that mandatory provisions enumerated under the Act have not been followed. In my considered opinion, there is no such mandatory provision to be followed while approaching the Court. The third ground is mode of issuance of summons. Even assuming that the mode for serving the summons adopted by the lower court is not in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 tune with the law, it cannot be a ground for quashing the proceedings. In view of the above stated reasons, I do not find any valid ground to quash the proceedings in M.C.No.13 of 2011. 4.Hence, this petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2011 are also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Judicial Magistrate Court No.III, Trichy +1cc to M/s.M.Ajmal Khan, Advocate Sr.No.35206 vs ssk/04.11.2011 /3c-2p/- Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13280 of 2011 11.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/