IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33660 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 18, 2009 Parvesh Kumari … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Anshumaan Dalal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Neena Madan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Though it has been mentioned in the order dated 04.12.2009 that the petitioner is married sister-in-law (Jethani) of the aggrieved lady, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that she is, in fact, the Devrani of the aggrieved lady. The necessary correction be, accordingly, made in that order. The learned State counsel informs that the petitioner had joined the investigation and that her person is no longer required by the police for any custodial purpose. In the light thereof, the order dated 04.12.2009 is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. December 18, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge