IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL SPA No.182 of 2008 S.K. Srivastava S/o D.P. Srivastava … Appellant Versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Dehradun & two others … Respondents Sri M.S. Bisht, Adv. for the appellant Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the State Coram Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. V.K. Gupta, C.J. (Oral) This is a totally frivolous and misconceived appeal. Even Writ Petition No.1549/2008 (M/S) was equally misconceived and frivolous petition. In the writ petition, the main relief claimed was to prevent Respondent No.2 from filing a writ petition against the order passed by Respondent No.1. Such a writ petition was not, at all, maintainable. The learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition. This appeal has no merit and is dismissed as such. (Dharam Veer, J.) (V.K.Gupta, C.J.) 25.09.2008 Rdang