1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR L.P.A.NO.313 OF 2010 IN W.P.NO.86 of 2003 (d) Manoj Dharmaraj Thakur ..vs.. Mah. State Road Transport Corpn. Thr.D.C. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.C.Jagdale, Adv. for the appellant. C ORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 13th October, 2010. Heard. In our opinion, there is no need to issue notice of this Letters Patent Appeal, since this court does not intend to pass any adverse order against the respondent. Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge, we find that the learned Single Judge had granted opportunity to the petitioner to make a representation for relaxation of the requirement of height restriction to work as a Conductor in terms of the power vested in the respondent-Corporation. We find that the appellant has been in service for last seven years. It would be appropriate to extend further protection to the appellant for a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the order, if adverse to his interest, on his representation. We, therefore, make the following order. 2 The Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of with a direction to the respondent not to give effect to the order, if adverse to the interest of the appellant on the representation made by him, in accordance with the direction made by this court in para no.10 of the judgment dated 12th April, 2010 in W.P.No.86 of 2003. With these observations, the Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE. pzc