1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.215/2011 Manohar Warluji Zade ..Vrs.. The State of Maharashtra, thr. The Superintendent, Nagpur Central Prison, Nagpur. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Shri Mohd. Ateeque,Advocate for appellant(appointed) Shri.D.B.Yengal, A.P.P. For respondent CORAM : MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ DATE : 26.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner had preferred an application for parole on the ground that his house is dilapidated hence it is necessary to repair/reconstruct the same. His application for parole came to be rejected on 7.1.2011. Hence the petitioner has approached to this court praying that the said order be set-aside and he be granted parole. 2 The affidavit filed by the respondents shows that on earlier occasions when the petitioner was released on furlough or on parole, on each occasion he was late in reporting back to jail. On 20.5.2006 the petitioner was released on furlough, he was late in surrendering. Thereafter, the petitioner was released on parole on 27.1.2007 he did not surrender in time. Thereafter the petitioner was released on furlough on 15.2.2008, he was late by 9 days in surrendering. Thereafter on 8.8.2008 the petitioner was released on parole, he was late by 47 days in surrendering. Thereafter on 1.1.2010 the petitioner was released on furlough but he was late by 53 days in surrendering and on the last occasion i.e. on 17.6.2010 he was released on parole but he was late by 84 days in reporting back to the prison. Thus it is noticed that each time the petitioner was released on parole or furlough, he did not report back to the prison in time and he has overstayed. Hence we cannot find any fault with the authorities in rejecting the application of the petitioner for parole. Hence petition is rejected. 3 The fees of the appointed Advocate are quantified at Rs 750/-. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner who is in Nagpur Central Prison. JUDGE JUDGE scd