i $-10, 12-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 1017/2011 BALLU RAM & ORS Appellants Through : Mr.N.S.Dalai with Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR& ANR Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Kunnar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.Pooja Bahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent No.2/DDA. LPA 1019/2011 PREM SINGH & ORS Through BHARAT SINGH & ORS Through Appellants Mr.N.S.Dalai with Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR& ANR Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.Pooja Bahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent N0.2/DDA. LPA 1020/2011 Appellants Mr.N.S.Dalai with Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR& ANR Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.Pooja Bahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent No.2/DDA. LPA 1021/2011 KARAMVIR & ORS Appellants Through : Mr.N.S.Dalai with Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. LPA Nos.1017/11, 1019/11, 1020- 1026/2011 Page 1 of 4 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified I versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR&ANR Respondents Through : Mr.SanjayKumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.PoojaBahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent No.2/DDA. LPA 1022/2011 SANJEEVKUMAR &ORS Appellants Through : Mr.N.S.Dalaiwith Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR&ANR Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Kunnar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.Pooja Bahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent N0.2/DDA. LPA 1023/2011 ASHWANI KUMAR Appellant Through ; Mr.N.S.Dalaiwith Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR&ANR Respondents Through : Mr.SanjayKumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.Pooja Bahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent N0.2/DDA. LPA 1024/2011 ROHTAS Appellants Through : Mr.N.S.Dalaiwith Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR&ANR Respondents Through : Mr.SanjayKumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.PoojaBahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent N0.2/DDA. LPA Nos.1017/11,1019/11,1020-1026/2011 PaQ® 2 of 4 LPA 1025/2011 ISHWAR SINGH Appellants Through: Mr.N.S.Dalaiwith Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR&ANR Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Kunnar Pathak, Advocate for respondent N,o.l/LAC Ms.Pooja Bahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent N0.2/DDA. LPA 1026/2011 FATEH SINGH &ORS Appellants Through: Mr.N.S.Dalaiwith Mr.Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITIONCOLLECTOR&ANR Respondents Through : Mr.SanjayKunnar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.l/LAC Ms.PoojaBahuguna counsel for Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, standing counsel for respondent N0.2/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG ORDER o/„ 05.12.2011 CM No.21884/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1017/2011 CM No.21887/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1019/2011 CM No.21888/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1020/2011 CM No.21889/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1021/2011 CM No.21890/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1022/2011 CM No.21891/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1023/2011 CM No.21892/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1024/2011 CM No.21893/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1025/2011 CM No.21894/2011 (Exemption) in LPA No.1026/2011 Allowed subject to just exceptions. LPA Nos.1017/11,1019/11,1020-1026/2011 Page 3 of 4 M LPA Nos.1017/2011. 1019/2011. 1020/2011. 1021/2011, 1022/2011. 1023/2011. 1024/2011. 1025/2011. 1026/2011, 1. After some arguments learned counsel for the appellants states that the appellants be permitted to withdraw the appeals inasmuch as the appellants intend to challenge the vires of Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, by raising pleas that by not providing for any interest to be paid post date of award till date when possession of the acquired land is taken over, there is arbitrariness in Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. 2. Suffice it would be to state that vires of legislative enactment can be questioned by a party who is aggrieved by the consequence of the arbitrary operation of the law, and for which no permission is required to file a writ petition. 3. The appeals are dismissed as not pressed. ^ DECEMBER 05, 2011 sa PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. S.P.GARG, J. LPA Nos.1017/11,1019/11, 1020- 1026/2011 Page 4 of 4