IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-19307 of 2008 Date of decision:20.10.2009. Bogha Singh @ Bogha and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. S.C.Chhabra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to raise these very pleas raised in this petition (and also whatever other pleas available to them) at the time of consideration of the charge. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforementioned. If, after the charge is framed, petitioner Nos.3 and 4 file a plea for exemption from their personal appearance, it shall be favourably considered by the learned Trial Court. However, the Trial Court shall be entitled to pass orders for their personal appearance whatever it deems fit, completely un-fazed by the present order. October 20, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE