IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 1208 of 2008 Between: Lalapet Sportmen Welfare Association, rep.by its Joint Secretary, P.Bikshapathi, S/o.Mallaiah office at 12-1-69, Lalapet, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,rep.by its Commissioner,office Near Tankbund, Hyderabad 2 The Executive Engineer, Zone NO.VII Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,Secunderabad 3 The Director of Sports, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad 4 T.Shivaraj Singh, Contractor,H.no.18-6-748,Laldarwaja Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 to 3 in trying to constructing a community hall in the play ground at Lalapet Beggar Home contrary to the decision and approved plan is illegal, arbitrary, malafide intentional and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 3 not to construct any community hall in the playground in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH, Hyderabad The Court made the following : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA W.P.NO. 1208 OF 2008 ORDER: (Per Anil R. Dave, HCJ) Apprehension of the petitioner was that the respondents 1 to 3 were likely to construct a community hall in the play ground at Lalapet Beggar Home, Secunderabad. The apprehension voiced in the writ petition appears to be not well founded for the reason that an affidavit has been filed by respondents 1 to 3 stating that there is no proposal with regard to establishment of any community hall in the play ground. In the circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, rejected. ________________ ANIL R. DAVE CJ _____​______________________ GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA J Dt.22.2.2008 KR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,rep.by its Commissioner,office Near Tankbund, Hyderabad 2 The Executive Engineer, Zone NO.VII Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,Secunderabad 3 The Director of Sports, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 4. 2 CCs to Standing Counsel for MCH, Hyderabad. 5.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}