IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10895 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Dhirender Dutt Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. Ashwnai Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been considered for appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Mechanical) under 50% batch-wise recruitment. However, the details as to when the posts were advertised and when the interviews were held have not been given. However, taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance, if surviving, to the competent authority, within a period of three weeks from today. The 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - competent authority shall decide the same within a period of two months after receipt of the representation to be made before him by the petitioner by a speaking and detailed order. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).