IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.A.C.P. No. 3 of 2010 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 15.10.2010 Gurmeet Singh .... APPELLANT Versus Dalip Singh and another ..... RESPONDENTS C.A.C.P. No. 5 of 2010 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 15.10.2010 Devinder Singh .... APPELLANT Versus Dalip Singh and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ranjivan Singh and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates, for the appellants. Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Dalip Singh. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) This order shall dispose of two appeals, bearing CACPs No. 3 and 5 of 2010, filed by Gurmeet Singh and Devinder Singh, respectively. Vide the impugned order, passed by the learned Single Judge, CACP No. 3 of 2010 -2- both the appellants, namely Gurmeet Singh and Devinder Singh, have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to paya fine of ` 2,000/- each, as appellant Gurmeet Singh had not honoured the undertaking given by him before the Court to vacate the demised premises and appellant Devinder Singh and appellant Gurmeet Singh, who was his relation, had joined hands together, in order to flout the said undertaking. By the impugned order dated 29.9.2010, the sentence of both the appellants was suspended for a period of two weeks, enabling them to avail their right of appeal. Yesterday, when these appeals were listed for hearing, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellants had stated that they want to purge the contempt and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to respondent No.1 Dalip Singh. On their stand, the cases were adjourned for today. Today, learned counsel for the appellants states that the vacant possession of the demised premises (Flat No. 3055/2, Sector 44-D, Chandigarh) has been handed over to the wife of respondent No.1 Dalip Singh on 14.10.2010. Shri S.S. Behl, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 Dalip Singh and states that the vacant possession of the demised premises has been taken over from appellant Gurmeet Singh by wife of respondent No.1 Dalip Singh, as respondent No.1 is out of country. In view of the fact that the contemners have purged the contempt and have CACP No. 3 of 2010 -3- handed over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the wife of respondent No.1, we set aside the sentence and fine, imposed upon the appellants by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, both the appeals are disposed of. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE October 15, 2010 ( JITENDRA CHAUHAN ) ndj JUDGE