IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6148 of 2011(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.A.VARGHESE, KONGALATH HOUSE, PALIAKARA, TIRUVALLA-689 101. BY ADVS. SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.PIN-688 101 3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHANGANACHERRY.PIN-686 101 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHANGANACHERRY.PIN-686 101 R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.6148 OF 2011 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court stating that the petitioner, who is the owner of the concerned property with clear road access to an extent of nearly 97.2 metres along the road is virtually prevented from enjoying the property in a proper manner, so long as the road puramboke has been encroached by the strangers, prohibiting right to access to the petitioner from every point abutting the road. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already projected the grievance by approaching the respondents by filing various representations such as Exts.P1, P2 and P3. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. This Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case, but for directing the second respondent to consider the matter at the first instance and deal with the situation. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, as Wpc 6148/2011 2 expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of `two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and others concerned. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for taking further steps. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE lgk