IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1057 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 731 OF 2005 Sadanand Sabaji Pawar ... PLAINTIFF V/s. Shantaram Sabaji Pawar & Ors. ... DEFENDANTS Mr. Shailesh More for the plaintiff. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 17th March, 2006. : 17th March, 2006. : 17th March, 2006. P.C. . Heard. 2. None for the defendants. 3. The basic suit is for partition between the parties. Plaintiff is claiming 1/3rd share in the suit property. Considering the averments made in the Notice of Motion and in the interest of justice I am inclined to grant prayer clause (b). The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff is also not pressing other prayers at this stage of the proceeding. In view of this Notice of Motion is disposed of and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). No order as to costs. ( 2 ) [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]