THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.293 of 2008 Dated:13.11.2009 Between: Datharu Ramakishan Rao. ….Petitioner And The District Collector, Warangal, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.293 of 2008 ORDER: The matter is coming up before this Court from March 2008 onwards. When the matter was listed on 12.11.2009, learned Counsel for the petitioner was absent and there was no representation. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today the matter is appearing under the said caption on the top of the list. In spite of the same, none appears for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent. The Contempt Case is, therefore, dismissed for default-non- prosecution. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 13.11.2009 vs