:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.360 OF 2007 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.360 OF 2007 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.360 OF 2007 Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Limited .. Petitioners. Versus Jyotsna Nitin Mehta .. Respondents. Mr.R.S.Mishra for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19th October, 2007. DATE : 19th October, 2007. DATE : 19th October, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None was present when the matter was called out in the morning session and kept back. None is present even now for the petitioner on second call. 2. The petition is under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The respondent is making payment under the Agreement in question and states that the installments, which are balance would be paid as per the terms :2: and conditions of the Agreement. 3. None appears to claim any ad-interim / interim relief in terms of the prayers in the petition. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)