ilNi^l F SFMKtil ^gi'tfLi^ £l£L.li<yi i ^' •^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0, /6$ '7-/ 2005 PETITIONERS (1) lt 4r\ ^ ^ \^.^ L M^ <^^// ^^' .A F/..^ /< ^ /^ /^ ^f ^ <^/< RESPONDENTS ^ (2) -<3) (4) Johanram Sinha S/o Manoharam Sinha Aged about 45 years, Caste- Kullar, H.C-08, P.S- Lasaguda Dist- Beejapur (C.G) Vinod Singh S/o Sada Singh Thakur Aged about 39 years, Caste- Khatri HeadConstableNo-538 P.S- Bacheli, Dist- Dantewada (C.G) Chetan Dubey S/o Late N.P.Dubey Aged about 33 years, Caste- Bhraman Head Constable No- 63 STF, P.S- Kirandul, Dist- Dantewada (C.G) Kanheyalal Sahu S/o Late Sukhiram Sahu Aged about 37 years, Caste- Teli Constable No- 532 P.S- Kirandul, Dist- Dantewada (C.G) Rajbahadur Yadav S/o Ayodhya Prasad Aged about 38 years, Caste- Rawat Head Constable No- 33, P.S- Kotwali, Dantewada Dist- Dantewada (C.G) Versus StateofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department OfHome (Police) Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) Director General ofPolice Police HQ, Raipur (C.G) Asst. Inspector General ofPolice (Adminstration), Police HQ Raipur (C.G) Superintendent ofPolice Dantewada, South Baster (C.G) <d z (S> WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 3TI^^T^)T R^i<=b3T[^r ^iW ^f^T ^^v^ x^v ^ocT ^j^M^, iSrft^FT^^ Rl<r11^^< sn^Tq^^ o3 ^ \& s-:n or ^TTOR^TshNlch """"""""* "'4 ^ 200 3TI^T ^cTTW ^cT 24.6.2005 Shri Harpreet Suigh petitiouers, Shri G. K. Beriwal, De^ respondents^ State. Heard. Leanied counsel for fhe petition was filed seekuig a reUeve tlie petitioners froni fh^ transferred place on the basi| 22.8.2004. After notice the 4 statiiig that aU the writ petif earlier vide order dated 22.8.[ order dated 17.6.2005. submits tliat except ti.ie peti|b have been retieved but the ]j] served with aiiy reMevuig orderj The respondents are copy of the reUevuig order 011 cao. joia. the new trao.sferTed pl| Iii view of the foreRoiiii fiiiaUv. Learrsied chl^fd41^ ^l^dT^te^^^K ^3Tf^T3TT^?T AhluwaUa, counsel for the •iity Advocate Generai for the petitioners submi^ that tliis direction froin fh.is Court to ? }3lace of workmg to tlie new 3 of flie traiisfer order dated espoiidents have filed retiini tioners who were tran.sfen'ed 2004 have been relieved vide coziusel for the petitioner tioner No.l other petitioners )etitioner No.l has not beeii acjcorduigly directed to serve a |the petiuoner No. 1 so that he .|ice ofpostiB.g. Lhe peti-fcfoTi stands disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (^^fe^)