:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION APPLICATION APPLICATION NO.2909 OF 2008 NO.2909 OF 2008 NO.2909 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.6599 OF 2004 NO.6599 OF 2004 NO.6599 OF 2004 Janardan Sakharam Phulare ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.R.L.Thorat i/b.L.C.Tolat & Co. for applicant. Mr.V.A.Sonpal, AGP for respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & :- V.C.DAGA & MRS.MRIDULA MRS.MRIDULA MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. BHATKAR,JJ. BHATKAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009 : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009 : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By an order dated 23rd August, 2004, Departmental Enquiry was directed to be completed on or before 31st December, 2004. 2. Thereafter, it appears that two extensions were granted to complete Departmental Enquiry. Inspite of that, Departmental Enquiry has not yet been completed by Municipal Council. Now, the Municipal Council, Raigad is again seeking extension of time to complete Departmental Enquiry. 3. Having heard learned Counsel appearing for petitioner, the prayer for extension of time is liable to be rejected for want of sufficient cause. However, if the Municipal Council wants to complete Departmental Enquiry, they may complete it on their own risk, but it cannot be under the orders of this Court. Civil Application stands disposed of in terms of this order. No order as to costs. (MRIDULA (MRIDULA (MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) BHATKAR,J.) BHATKAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) :2: