IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32525-M of 2010 Date of Decision:11.11.2010 Mohd. Farim and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sugreev Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Paul, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. H.S. Sullar, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.80 dated 20.04.2009 registered under Sections 324/ 326/ 307/ 452/ 148/ 149 IPC at Police Station Sadar Phagwara, District Kapurthala. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant does not dispute that the matter has been compromised and the petition for quashing of FIR has also been filed. Whether the said compromise can be made basis for quashing of FIR or not is still to be considered. However, at this stage the prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail. In view of the above, petitioners if arrested, shall be released on anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of arresting officer, subject to the condition that the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when required by the police and shall also comply with conditions specified in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Disposed of. 11.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE