IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29971 of 2011 1. Tetari Devi, wife of Hira Yadav 2. Manoj Yadav, son of Hira Yadav 3. Satyendra Yadav, son of Hira Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 20.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner No. 2 and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the First Information Report it has been stated that on 2.5.2011, the informant was given information by the petitioner No. 2 that his sister had died on 30.4.2011 on account of stomach-ache. When the Informant arrived at the place of occurrence, he did not even see the dead body. He started dialogue that the accused persons to transfer some property in the name of the son of the deceased i.e. his nephew. This, the accused persons refused to do so he instituted the present case. Subsequently, the Informant filed a petition stating therein that he filed the present case on a misconception. In view of such, let the petitioner No. 2 in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 75 of 2011, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional 2 Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Distt. Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)