IN THE MATTER OF: Peiiiioner/Applicant CR. M. P. Noyl2,oF 2011 .Smgle Bench Sofish Goenko, S/o Shri Gopichond Goenka, Aged about 39 years, Direcfor of J.M.G. Steel Pvt. Ltd. R/O Tedighat, gL lnfront of Keshwani Market, Pcfna, Police Station— Khaje KONG, Disfrict- Pofno, Bihor Presented by shii -- - um. VERSUS Respondent/Complainant wig Ramavfor Agrowol, S/o Shri Poorcm Chand Agrawol, Aged obou’r 60 years, Director of Epic Alloy Steel Pvt. Ltd. R/o Krishna Vihar Colony, Dhlmarpur, P.S. Kotra Road, Raigarh, District- Raigarh / : 1973 mx GR Uéig N THE'HIGH coURt or CHHATTISAH At BIIASP‘g PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 6F THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, “g': WWW i‘m raw, mikm,W 2&0 m Fa WW, miiwnz, farm W $W.nm. “0.".m 2:30 m WW (WWW arémw§ni$ wwwmr W 1/ aTso submitted certain discharge certificates showing that he rem ined admitted in hospital and had undergone renal transplant operati n on 29.5.2009. The learned Court below has rejected the application holding that the operation and the ailment related documents show hat the petitioner had suffered the problems almost 2 years before an there is no material to show that at that stage, the petitioner is suffe ng from any ailment or any other medical complications. reservaflon. lfie p‘éTif'l6fTé'F amimanam The submission of the peitioner and the basis for seeking exemption that he is a patient, suffe ing from certain renal problems, has not been disputed by anyone. The petitioner is required to come from Patna to attend the criminal proce dings at Raigarh. It has to be seen that the allegation of commission of offence does not relate to any heinous case or a grave accusatio . Present is a case of dishonour of cheque. Taking into consideration he totality of the circumstances, in the opinion of this Court, the Court $elow ought to have adopted a liberal attitude while considering petitioner’s application for exemption from personal appearance, allowing him :o appear though his counsel. Under these circumstances, l am inclined to interfere in the matter. Accordingly, the order of tha Court below rejecting petitioner’s application for exemption from his personal appearance and issuing ailable warrant is quashed. However, the petitioner shall appear before the Court below on or before 12‘" December, 2011 and shall Continue to appear there, unless exempted from his appearance. , WWWE—«FS/l 40---2/ 201 l’——-1 ,50,000. ' b 7m W, 3&wra15, WW MW€§FTH§TW5&W“@I§% appear bef37é the Court below as directed above, the Court below will be at liberty to take coercive steps to compel production of the petitioner. The petition is accordingly all awed to the extent indicated above; Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ‘l § i__ L _ m "ea’tzr 235m 5am, «mmawb‘S/i 4o—~-2/2o 1 1-—1 ,so,ooo. 311%?! m Me‘a’ wamgmm ,. , F ' gmTwm ”:3/ __,m _~_ mswwq arm} ifW ifsr'w %3%man%31