IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36688 of 2008 SHATRUGHNA MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 7.1.2009 Heard Sri Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is named in the FIR of a case under Section 302 IPC and one of the co-accused, namely, Renu Devi has been admitted to bail in Cr.Misc.Petition No.11934 of 2008. The said accused Renu Devi divulged the whole story of killing Bharat Lal Deo who was invited by her husband to take meat. The lady also pointed the reason for killing of Bharat Lal Deo and the place at which and in the manner in which the dead body of the said Bharat Lal Deo was disposed of. The recovery of the dead body was made consequent upon the statement of Renu Devi. On perusal of the order passed in favour of Renu Devi, I could find that the most important angle appears not placed before the Hon’ble Judge who was hearing that petition inasmuch as this is a case of conspired murder and this could be the statement which could be admitted under Section 10 read with Section 27 of the Evidence Act. In that light, the prayer for bail of the above named petitioner is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )