IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27551 of 2008 BHAIYALAL SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner is an accused of a complaint case which has been filed by Kismatiya Devi on the allegation that her son was taken to Punjab by the petitioner and others but he did not return. Submission is that the informant’s son met with an accident for which UD case was registered, thereafter, the information was sent to the informant’s husband Yogendra Sahani. He went there and a panchayati was organized in Punjab in which the complainant’s husband and full younger brother have participated and as per the decision of the panchayat Rs. 40,000/- was paid by the owner of the firm to Bunki Sahani who has participated in the panchayati on behalf of the complainant. Further submission is that the present complaint was filed after long apse of time and there was no explanation as to why the matter dated 20.11.2004 was reported in the year 2006. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Bhaiyalal Sahni is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. K. Tripathi, J. M. Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 865 of 2006. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)