THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4420 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.1132 of 2008 in the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool against the respondents for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction in respect of Acs.6.20 cents of land in Survey No.36 and Ac.0.80 cents of land in Survey No.102 of Nidzur Village, Kurnool Mandal. During the course of trial, the petitioner filed Exs.A4 to A6, namely pattadar pass book, title deed and Adangal in respect of the said land. The respondents, on the other hand, filed Exs.B1 and B2 pattadar pass book and title deed in respect of those very lands. The suit is at the stage of arguments. The petitioner filed I.A.Nos.502 and 503 of 2008 with a prayer to reopen the evidence and to summon the Tahsildar of the Mandal with a direction to produce 1-B Register and adangals in respect of the lands. The trial Court dismissed the applications through order, dated 18.08.2010. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. It is, no doubt, true that Exs.A4 to A6 and Exs.B1 and B2 are title deeds in respect of the same land and are issued in favour of different persons. If Exs.B1 and B2 are issued without there being any change in the records, it would naturally be a matter of serious concern and the petitioner was very much entitled to summon the Tahsildar to throw light on the controversy. In their counter-affidavit, the respondents have categorically stated that the entries in favour of the petitioners leading to issuance of Exs.A4 to A6 have been set aside and after such a change, Exs.B1 and B2 were issued. If that is so, the remedy of the petitioner is elsewhere, namely to prefer an appeal against the orders that may have been passed against him. Unless the petitioner verifies this aspect, the exercise undertaken by him in filing the applications would become futile. Hence, the civil revision petition is disposed of, upholding the orders under revision, but leaving it open to the petitioner to verify from the Office of the Tahsildar, Kurnool as to whether any changes have been affected in the records after Exs.A4 to A6 were issued. In case any change has taken place as to the entries, it shall be open to him to pursue the remedies under Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. On the other hand, if Exs.B1 and B2 were issued in favour of the respondents without any change in the records, it shall be open to the petitioner to renew his application for summoning the Tahsildar. The trial Court shall adjourn the suit for four (4) weeks to enable the petitioner to undertake this exercise. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 15.11.2010. Note: Issue cc in three days. (B/o) kdl