THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.815 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Government Pleader for the Courts of the rank of Senior and Junior Civil Judges at Vijayawada, through order, dated 09.02.2005, for a term of three years. The appointment terminated through order, dated 28.06.2006. The petitioner filed O.S.No.2441 of 2006 in the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada for the relief of declaration that the abrupt termination of his services is contrary to law. He has also filed I.A.No.630 of 2006 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. to restrain the respondents from taking steps for appointment of his incumbent. The trial Court allowed the I.A., through its order, dated 20.12.2006. Aggrieved thereby, the respondents filed C.M.A.No.8 of 2007 in the Court of V Additional District Judge, Vijayawada. The appeal was allowed, through judgment, dated 16.01.2010. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Arbitration. The suit filed by the petitioner is one for declaration simplicitor. No further consequential relief was claimed. It is axiomatic that any interim relief claimed in a suit must be in conformity or consonance with the main relief claimed in the suit. At any rate, the petitioner cannot prevent the respondents from making alternative arrangements in his place. An injunction granted in this regard would hamper the progress of the cases and the Government would be left un-represented. The lower appellate Court has taken a correct view of the matter and this Court is not inclined to take a different view. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit as early as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:23.06.2010 kdl