CWP No.12438 of 2007 (O&M) and -1- CWP No.5825 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 06.03.2009 1) CWP No.12438 of 2007 (O&M) Surinder Kumar Versus State of Haryana and another 2) CWP No.5825 of 2007 Gopal Krishan Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. Sanjay Vashisth and Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. O. P. Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.5, 7 to 12. AJAY TEWARI J. This order shall dispose of CWP No.12438 of 2007 (O&M) and CWP No.5825 of 2007. The petitioners have challenged their transfer from Kurukshetra to Kaithal when District Kaithal was carved out of District Kurukshetra. Today, learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners would be satisfied if their case for re-transfer back to Kurukshetra can be considered in the event of any vacancy lying vacant or arising at Kurukshetra. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that as per Rule 10 of CWP No.12438 of 2007 (O&M) and -2- CWP No.5825 of 2007 the Haryana Subordinate Court Establishment (Recruitment and General Conditional Service Rules 1977), the petitioners are ready to forego their seniority over and above any official who may already be working at Kurukshetra. I find this to be a fair request. In the circumstances, respondents No.3 is directed to consider the case of transfer of the petitioners to Kurukshetra in case of availability of any post in view of their submission that they are ready to forego their seniority in terms of Rule 10. A photocopy of this order be placed on connected file. March 05, 2009 ( AJAY TEWARI ) ashish JUDGE