IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11879 of 2009 Between: Surapudi Panchali W/o.Late Surapudi Singaram R/o.Thonduru Village, Tada Post, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 2 The Chairman, Co-operative Joint Forming Society, Thonduru Village, Tada Post, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3 Vetti Chakrapani S/o.Gopalakrishna Thonduru Village, Tada Post, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 1st Respondents in not disposing of the Appeal Roc.No.E4/16390/2008 dated -1-2009 before the 1st respondent is unjust, illegal and violative of Article, 14, of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to disburse the compensation amount due for the acquisition of the land in an extent of Ac.2-63 cents in Sy.No. 188/2, of Thonduru Cooperative Joint Forming Society, Thonduru, Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.DORAI RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R:- On 02.07.2009, when this matter was taken up for admission, none appeared for the petitioner, as such, this Court adjourned the matter to 09.07.2009 under the caption “For Dismissal”. In spite of the matter being listed under the caption “For Dismissal” on that day, none appeared for the petitioner nor was made any representation on her behalf, as such, this Court again adjourned the case to this day. Even today, when the matter was called, none appeared for the petitioner nor was made any representation on her behalf. Hence, it seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 10th July, 2009 bcj