THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO A N D THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1688 OF 2000 Dated : 02.02.2010 Between : Y.Ramesh ….. Appellant a n d Smt.Y.Uma Rani ….. Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO A N D THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1688 OF 2000 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. This appeal is directed against the order and decree, dated 31.03.2000, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Bhongir, Nalgonda District, dismissing O.P.No.34 of 1997 filed by the appellant under Section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage and divorce. The appellant is the petitioner-husband and the respondent is the respondent-wife before the Court below. Both the parties to the Appeal, who remained present before this Court today, are identified by each other as well as by their respective counsel. Further, both the parties have signed the application and when enquired by this Court, both the parties admitted the contents of the Memorandum of Compromise, their signatures on the application and expressed their willingness to have a compromise decree and that the signatures of the parties have also been identified by the learned counsel appearing on their behalf. As a part of the compromise, a demand draft bearing No.984421 dated 30.01.2010 for a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousands only) drawn on Andhra Bank, Dilsukhnagar branch, has been handed over by the husband to the wife in the open Court in the presence of their respective learned counsel. Having regard to the fact that the matter has been settled out of the Court between the parties to the present Appeal and also having regard to the Memorandum of Compromise filed to the said effect, the marriage between the parties shall stand dissolved. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed in terms of Memorandum of Compromise and there shall be a decree in terms of said Memorandum of Compromise and consequently, O.P.No.34 of 1997 stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. A copy of the Memorandum of Compromise shall be annexed to this judgment, which shall form part of this Judgment. _________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J ________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 2nd February, 2010 SKM/SUR