IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1202 OF 2004 (SS) Brij Veer Singh …………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others. ……..Respondents. Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate holding brief of Mr. K.N. Joshi, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. 20th October, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate holding brief of Mr. K.N. Joshi, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate holding brief of Mr. K.N. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner has given a statement at the bar that as per the instructions, the matter has become infructuous as the only grievance of the petitioner regarding payment of arrears of salary has been met and since the payment of arrears of salary has been made to the petitioner, cause of action survives no more in the present writ petition. On the basis of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.10.2009 Rathour