\ Madhuri Uke HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IC) NO.6272 OF 2010 PETITIONER Vers'us State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite the judgment pronounced by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State of Chhattisgarh & Othersl, the application for verification of the. caste certificate of the petitioner is not being accepted by the respondent No.2. For non-compliance of the order by the respondent No.2, the petitioner has been driven to approach this Court. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been told by some officer of the respondent No.2/Committee to take permission of the Court. Bel that as it may, if it is so, it amounts to serious non-compliance of the order passed by this Court willfully, which may be considered in appropriate case, 1 WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19-8-2010 \ .v \ RESPONDENTS Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri B.L. Dembra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (ORAL) (Passed on this 16th day of November, 2010) 1 . Heard learned counsel for the 2 (2% 5. Shri Bhaduri, Iearned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents submits that there is no reason for not complying with the judgment and order passed by this Court. Accordingiy, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner, in accordance with the directions passed by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria1 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, because for non-acceptance of application filed by the petitioner, the petitioner has waited for a long period. I Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun