1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3534 of 2008 In Criminal Appeal No. 685 of 2008 Ravindra v. Pradeep Nanasaheb Patil -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr V.M. Deshpande, Adv for applicant Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 5th August 2009 1. Criminal Application No. 3534 of 2008 : Applicant by this application filed under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C. seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 12.8.2008 rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nandgaon Khandeshwar in Summary Criminal Case No. 541 of 2006. 2. Heard learned counsel for applicant. None appears for respondent, though served. Perused application and impugned judgment and order. 3. It was not necessary to be mentioned in the memo of complaint whether alleged Usanwar chithi was returned by applicant, is required to be examined. Evidence adduced on record also needs to be reappreciated. Hence, leave to appeal is granted. Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. 2 4. Criminal Appeal No. 685 of 2008 : Heard learned counsel for appellant. None appears for respondent though served. Admit. Call for R & P. Action under Section 390 Cr.P.C. to follow. Judge. hsj