IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1099 of 2008 GOVIND PRASAD, SON OF LATE YAMUNA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF AUDI GOLA ROAD, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR……………………………….….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE D.I.G. MUZAFFARPUR, RANGE MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE OFFICER INCHARGE OF MUZAFFARPUR KOTWALI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR…………………………..……….RESPONDENTS ----------- 4. 19.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this writ application, petitioner has grievance that the concerned Investigating Officer is not taking proper steps in connection with investigation of Muzaffarpur P.S. Case no.197 of 2008 and is not taking steps for arrest of the accused persons against whom case has been found true. From the page of the case diary annexed as Annexure-B to the counter affidavit, it appears that the case has been found true against two accused persons. However, noting in the case diary is dated 08.11.2008. There is nothing on record to show as to whether police has taken any step for proclamation and attachment under Sections 82 - 2 - and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against all the accused persons and as to what further steps have been taken to ensure the arrest of the accused persons and submission of the charge sheet. Police is directed to take steps for the same as early as possible, complete investigation of the case and submit a final report. With the above observations, the writ application is disposed of. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)