srp. :1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLI. NO. 91 OF 2007. Jagannath Khodaji Rathod. ..Applicant. Versus. Mrs. Shashikala J. Rathod. ..Respondent. --- Mr. P. J. Pawar for the applicant. Mrs. M.M.Deshpande, APP for the State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATE: MARCH 22, 2007. DATE: MARCH 22, 2007. DATE: MARCH 22, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Pawar, learned counsel for the applicant. He states that there is a limit prescribed for maintenance in Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. However, we find that there is no such limit as a result of the amendment in said section. The quantum of maintenance can be fixed taking into consideration the income, age and standard of living of the parties. Except this no other point is raised. Revision is without any merit. It is hereby rejected. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)