..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2526 OF 2008 Heena Ramesh Lulla. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.N.N. Gavankar, Adv. h/f. Mr.Arfan Sait, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 14th August,2008. DATED : 14th August,2008. DATED : 14th August,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-116 of 2008 of Nalasopara Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The dispute arose as water was falling from the window of the applicant. The applicant came to the room of the complainant Sharda and started quarrelling as to why the complainant and others were giving complaints regarding water falling from her window. The applicant caught hold of the ..(2).. hair of the complainant-Sharada and started assaulting her with kick blows and fist blows. One Multanmal Jain was also assaulted in the incident by the applicant and other persons. Witness Kashmira has stated that the applicant assaulted Multanmal Jain with wooden log. So also witness Jyoti has stated that the applicant along with other accused assaulted Multanman Jain. Multanmal Jain sustained 14 injuries in the incident including fracture of the left leg and four injuries to the head. The cause of death is due to head injury. The applicant is the person who had the main motive for committing the offence. She has also participated in the assault on Multanmal Jain. Looking to the injuries of Multanmal Jain though he died about 10 days after the incident, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. Hence, application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)