IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20385 of 2009(P) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- A.M.ASHARAF, MUBARAK MANZIL, VANDIPERIYAR. BY ADV. MR.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).20385/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner holds a regular permit to operate a Limited Stop Ordinary Service on the route Kumali - Kottayam. He sought for a parity in running time on a par with other Limited Stop Services operating at the rate of 1.75 minutes per Km. Petitioner's request was originally rejected by the RTA. But in appeal, the STAT found that the petitioner is entitled to parity. It seems that the RTA, on consideration of the request pursuant to Ext.P1, again rejected the same and this was challenged before the Tribunal in revision. That was allowed as per Ext.P2. Petitioner's grievance arises out of the alleged delay in the implementation of Ext.P2. Hence the writ petition. Having heard learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to take further steps pursuant to Ext.P2 and see that orders are passed as directed therein within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs