IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2007 / 23RD SRAVANA 1929 WA.No. 1997 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.21834/2007 Dated 23/07/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: ---------------------- M/S. TATA TEA LIMITED, SPECIAL PROJECTS OFFICE, GENERAL HOSPITAL COMPLEX, MUNNAR-685 612, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER- ADMINISTRATION, MR.PRATAP RAMDAS. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, K.D.H. VILLAGE, MUNNAR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVICOLAM TALUK. 4. THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HEAD WORKS AND TUNNEL SUB DIVISION NO.1, PALLIVASAL EXTENSION SCHEME, MUNNAR. 5. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, CIVIL CIRCLE, KOTHAMANGALAM, REPRESENTED BY THE DY. CHIEF ENGINEER. 6. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM-695 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 7. THE LAND BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J. ................................................................................... W.A. No. 1997 OF 2007 ................................................................................... Dated this the 14th August, 2007 J U D G M E N T H.L. Dattu, C.J.: Shri Joseph Kodianthara, learned counsel appearing for the appellant , after arguing the matter for quite sometime would only request us to say in the order that would be passed by this court, that the interim order passed by this court in W.P.(C) 21834 of 2007 dated 23.07.2007 shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case. 2. The respondents have no objection, whatsoever, to say so, as requested by the learned counsel for the appellant. 3. In that view of the matter, without going into other details or merits or de-merits of the case, the Writ Appeal is disposed of, by only stating that the interim order passed by this court in the Writ Petition No. 21834 of 2007 dated 23.07.2007 shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk