IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 15 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 90 OF 2000 MR. NAZAR DA SILVA & ANR. ..... Petitioner Versus MR. MENINO D'SOUZA, DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS GOA AND 4 ORS., ..... Respondents Petitioner No. 2 is appearing in person. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. J.J. Mulgaonkar, Amicus Curiae. Coram:- A.P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 8 th October, 2010. P.C. Heard petitioner No. 2 who is present in person as well as Mr. Mulgaonkar, learned Amicus Curiae and Advocate Mr. Shirodkar, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. After hearing Petitioner no. 2, learned Government Advocate and learned Amicus Curiae, I am of opinion that petitioners have not made up any case for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents and as such contempt petition stands dismissed. I would like to place on record appreciation to Mr. Mulgaonkar, learned Amicus Curiae for his valuable assistance. A. P. LAVANDE, J. Ev