IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.14469 of 2009 ***** Ramashish Manjhi, son of Jageshwar Manjhi, resident of village- Mahesha Farakpur, P.S. Runnisaidpur, District-Sitamarhi. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 2. 6.8.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.377 of 2008 for the offences 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant is the mother of one Babita Kumari, who has alleged that her daughter has gone to attend to the call of nature in the night of December 8-9, 2008 but she did not return home till the morning. On due enquiry she came to learn that the present petitioner had kidnapped her for the purpose of marriage or otherwise. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the intention of the petitioner was to enter into matrimony with the girl and even in the 164 Code of Criminal Procedure statement, she does not allege that the petitioner had misbehaved with her during the period she was in the so-called custody of the petitioner. Petitioner had even otherwise remained in custody since 10.12.2008. In the totality of the circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Ramashish Manjhi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No.377 of 2008 with a direction - 2 - that he will not establish any contact with the victim girl or try to intimidate the witnesses or the informant of the case and shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. It is further recorded that one of the sureties will be executed by the father of the petitioner on due identification. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)