IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16110 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 30, 2011 Manita Pawar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Jagbir Mor, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed a representation with the grievance that the candidates like her were informed at the time of interview that they must have 60% marks in STET. That representation still is pending. No case for interference at this stage is made out as there is no authentic proof of this fact placed on record. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Deputy Commissioner to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order. August 30, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE