IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No.115 of 2009 Bahadur Singh Patni ……… Petitioner Versus State of U.P. & others ………. Respondents Mr. Vipul Sharma with Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Advocates for the petitioner Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel for State of UP/respondents 1 to 4 Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents 5 & 6 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Date of Decision: 07.12.2010 Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) The manner, in which the writ petition has been framed, the same should not have been accepted at all. However, since counter affidavit has been filed and in that it has been stated that steps are being taken for improvement, we dispose of this writ petition with a request to the respondents to stick to their promise, as held out in the counter affidavit. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 07.12.2010 Aswal/Rdang