.iMC-Us .^^^&?--»" iiE NK1 1 @ IN THE mOH COURT OF CIIHATTISGARH BILASPUR WP. N0. ^8^S—/2006 PETITIONER ..•••' s^\. ^M^ l* * 1 .^l l \**' ^v^s..1-' ^y^" /' VERSUS Ram Nivas Sahu, aged about 40 years, S/o Ramjeet Sahu R/o Village Narayanpur, Janpad Panchayat Ramanuj- nagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja, C.G. RESPONDENTS ^'G^ ^ ^^ .^"' G^ t>! / 1) Bahnukund, aged about 35 years, S/o Sangram Ram, R/o village Tripureshwarpur, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja, (C.G) 2) Ram Batti (TahsUdar) Presiding Officer (Panchayat Election) Janpad Panchayat Ramanujnagar, TahsU Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3) R.S. Gupta (Panchayat Inspeetor) Janpad Panchayat Ramanujnagar Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). 4) Collector, District Surguja, C.G. 5) The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary and Ministry, Panchayat Services and Rural Oevelopment Departnient, ^.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDERj^RTICLE 22>6/227 OF THE £ftONOF INDIA r ^ HIGHGOUKFOIiEBm^tIStSafiHa^lMElSiiiK •:WRn'TETm©N'^;<48551©B20 ^:^S Petitioner Versus Respondents RamNivas Sahu Bahnukund & Ofhers ^, WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Ashok Kumar Shidda, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kmiiar Verma, Advocate forthe respondent No.l. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No. 4 & 5. 2. (Passed oa 22nd day ofJuly, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that ia view of the fresh election, which has been taken place in Febmary, 2010, nothiiis sun'ives in this petition for adjudication and the saine has beeome uitmctuous. Shi-i Thakur, leamed counsei appearing for respondent No.4 & 5 has no obiection. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as havmeAecQinemfmctuous. ' */ ^ ^. < ' '"' ashok Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ^ ^