IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1442 of 2008 PARWATI DEVI …petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. AAURANGJEB @ ASGAR ALI @ SHEIKH ASAGAR @ SHIBHU …opposite parties For the Petitioner : Mr.Udit Narayan Singh & : Mrs. Poonam Kumari For O.P. : Mr.P.Pandey & : Mr. J.K.Pandey For the State : Mr. Upadhyay,APP ----------- 03. 19.08.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner(informant) is aggrieved by the order passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board in G.R.Case No.1740/07 arising out of Bhabua P.S.Case No.435/07, whereby on an enquiry, it has been found that the accused(o.p.no.2) was juvenile(less than 18 years of age) on the date of occurrence. Such finding was recorded after allowing the party to produce relevant documents as also adduce evidence. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner seems to have filed an appeal being Cr.Appeal No.31/08. The learned revisional court on a consideration of materials placed on record concurred with the finding of learned Juvenile Justice Board. This is what has been observed in paragraph 12 of the judgment: “From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the accused was produced before the Juvenile Board vide order dated 05.09.2008 and the learned J J Board was opinion on his production that from his appearance he appears to be a juvenile as neither he has mustaches nor Bear. He has also considered two witnesses examined on behalf of accused who have been 2 cross-examined also. The E.W.1 is an Assistant Teacher of Urdu Middle School, Bhabua, who has brought the Admission Register of the school and the name of the accused in the Admission Register of long period finds at sl.no.53 and it appears that he was admitted in the said school on 02.04.1997, though the learned court below has wrongly mentioned his date of birth in the column meant for date of birth in the said Register as 02.04.1997 but from perusal of the same it appears that actually the same is date of his admission and the date of birth is mentioned as 11.03.1992. He has also considered the Registration certificate containing photograph and the marksheet issued by B S E Board along with the Medical report and has observed in the impugned order that the genuineness of the admission register and the documents filed on behalf of the accused has not been challenged. Hence in consideration of the physical appearance, the documents and the evidence produced on behalf of the accused the learned J.J. Board is of opinion that the accused in the juvenile trial was a juvenile on the alleged date of occurrence.” On hearing the parties and after going through materials on record, this Court does not find any patent illegality in those findings recorded by two courts below meriting any interference. Consequently, the revision application fails. It is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )