^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARIL BILASPUR M.C.C.^No.34Lof2Q08 ifir1'-:1 APPLICANT/ RESPPNDBNT N0.1. RESPONDBNT Municipal Corporation, BhUai, Distt. Durg, through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporaflon BhUai, Distt, Durg(aG). Versus S.K, Taini'akar (SushU Kumar Tamrakar), aged about 54 years, son of late Pakloo Sao, Assistant Engiaeer, Municipal Corporation Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G). ^PeUtioner The State Goveinment of Chhatdsgarh, Through fhe Secretaiy, Nagadya Prashashaa aad Parysivaraii Department Miaistry, Raipur (C.G). Shn R.K. Narang, Assistant Engiaeer, Municipal corporation, Bhilai, Distt. Durg. Shii Gendsiagh Tamrakar, Assistaat Engiaeer, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Distt/ Durg. Shri Satyendra Siagh, Assistaat Engiaeer, Municipal Corporatioiiy Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G) .Respondents No.2 ta 5 Appearaace : Shri. H,B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate wifh Ku. Saageeta Mishra, counsel for the petitioner, ShriArun Sao, Govt. Advocate, for respondentno.2. QRALORDBR 105.03.2008) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on adiaission. M.C.C. No.34/2008 -^ '(- By onler dated 24.9.2007 passed ia W.P.(S) No.5494/2007 this court had issued fhe followiag directions: It is directed that if the representation filed by the petitioner on 30,6.2005 (Annexure P/5) has not been disposed of so far, fhe saine shaU be disposed of wifhia a period of 6 weeks froin tlie date of jBlbig of certified copy of fhis order alongwifh copy of fhis writ petition. However, tlie petitioner shall be obUged to file such copies withia a period of 15 days froin today, It is stated by Mr. Agrawal that fhereafter a representation was JBled by fhe writ petitioner on 03.10.2007 (Annexure B) aad the saiae was disposed of on 15,11.2007 (Annexure C) by the concenied autliority of respondent no.l, appMcant hereia, that ineaas it was disposed of by fhe said authority wifhin fhe time graated by fhis Court. He subinits tiiat this M.C,C. has been filed seekiag extension of tiiae only because it was not communicated wifhin six weeks. In view of fhis, no extension of tune ia this niatter is required because the direction was only to dispose oftihie representation withia a penod of six weeks aiid not for communicating tibie saine wifhiii fhe said period. With fhe above observations, fhis M.C.Q staads disposed of at the inotion stage, as accordiag to ftie contentions of ftie applicant itself, no orders are required ia tiie M.C.C. Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge /Rao/