0%) IN ' ' PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through-The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT - INDIA THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘9 WRIT PETITION (S) No. qlk {2011 x PETITI N NDE A C E 26 OF HE CONSTITUTION OF FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION ETC: -‘- I, Amol Si‘ngh Thakur, aged about 56 / \A years, Son of Shri Mohar Singh Thakur, .I presently working as “Head Master” at n. a“ Govt. Prima‘i’y School- Kudhari, Block & Tahsil- Sarangarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.) 1,.t...(?....§2§3.‘{.‘.€~.:...mm zoo mm (Wu) mmfaw mmm WW fs€tm $WW 3.: HON’BLE MR JUSTIC ITINKER DIWAKER 03.08.201 1 r WWW Shri Roop Najk, counsel the pmiu'oner. Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for the State. Counsel for the petitione Submits that at this stage, he petiubn with liberty to make may be permitted to withdraw a mpresentau'on to the State authorities in the light of the of regular pay scale w.e.f. the cimular dated 5. 1.2011 for initial date of appointment. Counsel for the State su mits that if a representation is made, the same shall be co sideied ambdeeided within a period of three months fr the date of receipt of the representation in the light of above stated circular. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. It expected that the concerned authorities would consider decide the representation, if any, as above, Within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the reptesentation along with a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Comt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at, liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sdll- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ... . . ... $ E R 's t o t i