<^."^ G tl;^._...^^j^:\ l 1 ^^"-^ J "^'... %^?t;^fs Soma HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Transfer Petition (Civill No.13 of 2011 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. M/s. R.S. Bajwa & Company, B-4, Minocha Colony, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Through their Managing Partner Rajendra Singh Bajwa S/o Late M.S. Bajwa, aged about 66 years, R/o B-4, Minocha Colony, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Executive Engineer, Barnai Canal Division, Chhattisgarh Water Resources Department, Ambikapur, Surguja, C.G. {Transfer petition under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure} Present: None present for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORDER (9-9-2011) 1. When the matter is called for hearing second time, none present for the petitioner. No representation is made. 2. Transfer of the execution case from the Couri: of District Judge, Ambikapur to the Court of District Judge, Bilaspur has been prayed on the ground mentioned in para 17 ofthe petition which reads as follows: - "That, in view of the poor health of the petitioner's Sr. Managing Partner; Mr. R.S. Bajwa and the unreasonable delays being caused in Execution Case No.01/2007 pending before Ld. District Judge, Surguja wherein last 38 date of hearings nothing happened to actually execute the Award as per the orders of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Hon'b.le High Court passed in WA No.208/2008 therefore, it would be in the greater interest ofjustice that the Execution Case No.1 of 2007 pending before the Learned District Judge, Surguja Ambikapur may please be transferred to the Court ofthe Learned District Judge, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh." 3. The petitioner is a Company and one Rajendra Singh Bajwa is Managing Partner of that Company. In execution proceeding, presence of the party in person is not necessary. Legality of the order or liberal view taken by the Court by itself are not the grounds of transfer. Consequently, 1 do not find any substance in the petition and the petition is dismissed summarily. No order as to co,sts. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge