.% C4; 250/” 3 SINGLE BENCH IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No: 59 256/ 2011 / 1 . NIRANJAN ‘ PETITIONERS S/o Shri. Saddi, Aged about 50 Yrs. Ex-Safai Karmachari In Nagar Panchayat, Pendra, R/o :' Itwari Bazar (Desan Para), PENDRA, Dist. Bilaspu'r (CG) RAMNARESH 'S/o Shri. Bhagirathi, Aged about 42 Yrs. EXrSafai Karmachari, In Nagar Panchayat, Pendra, R/o : Lohataraiyya Para, Near Shital Mandir, PENDRA I Dist. B-ilaspur (CG) VERSUS 11/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Commissioner, Direetorate, Urban Administration and Development Department, /. RAIPUR -492001(CG) . . ”The ChiefMunieipalOffIcer, Nagar Panchayat, PENDRA Dist. Bilaspur (CG) W “ 2 [SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J. 30.9.20 1 1 Shn’ Dhirendra Mishra, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Chandresh Shrivasfava, Panel Lawyer for the State, on advance copy. e Heard on admission. Venting their grievae on account of non-regularimu'on for want of vacancies, the petioners had earlier approached this Cour by tiling wn‘t petition, h was disposed of vide order dated 24.6.2011 (Annexure P—8), o rving that in case the claim of the' ' petitioners are not decided by the Nagar Panchayat within reasonable time, the petitione would be at liberty to take recourse to such remedy as may be av le to them under the law. Learned counsel for the titioners submits that the stalemate r continues even now and w t there being any decision of the Commissioner, Urban Admin ration 8t. Development Department with regard to the sanction o post, the services of petitioners have been terminated. He submit that the services of the petitioners were liable to be regularized in View of the circular of regularization dated 5.3.2008. ilat nc ti t w 'c b e r ‘ a‘ b e i u i t W f s “é f XI-Hc 7s 3a W, were;, W LJ €C§2S7ZS mm 200 WWm (WEI) WWW aznmm WWm WWW wlf6R§R % W 311%?! XI~HC—78 3Q mammm,W Praveen The petitioners were working as daily-wage employees. The proposal for creau'on of post was sent by the Nagar Panchayat, Commissioner for sanction. However, before the e matter for grant of sanction for H creauon Q x M 6f post, the services of the petitioner have been terminated. It appears that the peu'tioners could not be regularized for want of sancu'orie ‘ Therefore, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere. However, the petitioners shall make represenmtion to the ion and Development Department sider as to whether the post are required to be sanctioned or ot. In case, the decision is taken to sanction the post on the basis f earlier proposal g’ven by the Nagar Panchayat, Pendra and sancu' n is granted, Nagar Panchayat shall consider the cases of the peti ' ners for regularization as per the circular dated 5.3.2008 issued y the State Govt. The exercise shall be co pleted by the Commissioner, Urban Administration and Develop nt Department within a period 3 months nom the date of receip of copy of this order. ‘ With the aforesaid observations, the petition is finally Sd/-‘ m Commissioner, Urban Admini and the Commissioner shall Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge disposed of. L t n s 111mm W200 WWW<Wa> mmm 3211mm mmm WW wm agwm