IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.232 of 2008 RAM DINESH SHARMA Versus TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS. ----------- 8. 10.9.2008 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. This application has been filed alleging violation of the order of this Court passed on 10.10.2007 in C.W.J.C. No.8097 of 2007, whereby direction was issued to respondent no.4-the Principal, Mahadeo Singh College, Bhagalpur (opposite party no.4 herein) to take immediate necessary action in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the University for election of the President and Secretary within the time fixed therein. The further direction was to respondent no.2-Vice-Chancellor of the Bhagalpur University (opposite party no.2 herein) to the effect that on receiving the proposal of the Principal seeking approval for convening the meeting of the members of the Governing Body for election of President and the Secretary, she shall consider the same and take appropriate decision in accordance with law within one week on receipt of such proposal taking into consideration the present order passed in the said writ application. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the opposite party did not act as per the directions. However, ultimately after delay, the proposal sent by the Principal was approved by the Vice-Chancellor of the University and accordingly a meeting of the Governing Body for election of the Office-bearers, which obviously 2 include President and Secretary, was held on 20th of April, 2008, in which all the members participated. However, for some reason or the other, the election of the office-bearers was not materialized. The learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the above submits that in fact, opposite parties have failed to carry out the order of this Court in true spirit and as such they are liable to be proceeded. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University, on the other hand, submits that the order of this Court as aforesaid has been fully complied with and any grievance with regard to resolution of the meeting whereby the election of office-bearers could not be materialized cannot be the subject-matter of contempt. After hearing the rival submissions of the parties and from the facts stated above, it would appear that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and no contempt is maintainable. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. However, it goes without saying that if any one has got any grievance against the resolution of the meeting of the Governing Body or the action of the University, it will be open for the person concerned to take appropriate steps for redressal of his grievances, in accordance with law. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)