IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4416 of 2009 Between: Kommuri Srinivasa Rao … Petitioner And Bolla Srinivasa Rao and another … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4416 of 2009 ORDER: - Petitioner/3rd party to the eviction proceedings in R.C.C.No.128 of 2007 filed the impugned I.A.No.525 of 2008 under Order I Rule 10 CPC to implead him as the 2nd respondent in the main R.C.C. and to contest the R.C.C. On dismissal of the I.A., by the learned Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, the present revision is filed. A Division Bench of this Court in Soni v. K.Nageswara Rao[1] held that in a rent control proceedings for eviction of the tenant initiated by the landlord, a third party raising disputed questions of title is not entitled to get impleaded and he can seek the relief in a regular suit on the question of title. In view of the same, no infirmity is discernible with the order passed by the court below. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J 26-08-2011 lmv HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4416 of 2009 Dt: 26-08-2011 lmv [1] 1991(3) ALT 200