Civil Revision No. 3872 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 3872 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.7.2010 Amrit Pal Singh …Petitioner Versus ICICI Bank Limited …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Parminder Singh Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The decree was passed against the petitioner in the year 2000. The execution application was filed in the year 2001. In pursuance of the execution application, the City Civil Court at Ahmedabad had sent the percept to Chandigarh Court for effecting attachment of the property. Impugned orders dated 6.1.2010 (Annexure P1) and 16.3.2010 (Annexure P2), have been perused. It is apparent that the Executing Court at Ahmedabad had sent the percept to the Court at Chandigarh. The following arguments were raised before the Court, which had passed the impugned orders:- A) That the Court at Ahmedabad had no jurisdiction to pass the decree. B) The Executing Court at Ahmedabad had afforded no opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Civil Revision No. 3872 of 2010 2 The Court at Chandigarh, which was giving effect to the percept sent by the Court at Ahmedabad, held in categoric terms that the Executing Court cannot go behind the decree. Hence, considering the objections without any merit, the same were dismissed. The reasoning given in impugned orders orders dated 6.1.2010 (Annexure P1) and 16.3.2010 (Annexure P2), is just and appropriate. Hence, no interference is called for in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed, in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 15, 2010 “DK”