1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition (L) No.1779 of 2009 Tata Capital Ltd. .. Petitioners v/s. Mukeshkumar J. Agrawal ..Respondent Ms.Leena Sapra i/b. Ashish Agarwal for the Petitioners Ms.Meenal Doshi for the Respondent CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 7th April , 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Advocates on both sides. Petitioners claim that they have advanced loan to the respondent by way of personal loan. Heard learned Advocates on both sides. Diverse reliefs are sought by the petitioners. After having considered each and every prayer, I am inclined to observe that as of today the respondent can be directed to furnish list of properties i.e. movable and immovable properties held by him. Petitioners can make use of the information at the appropriate time. Other reliefs in the nature of injunction against the 2 residential accomodation in question cannot be granted. Hence petition is disposed of by passing following order. ORDER i) Petition is disposed of as follows with no order as to costs. ii) Respondent is directed to furnish to the Petitioners within a period of three weeks from today the list of movable and immovable properties held by him. This shall be done in the form of an affidavit. iii) Learned Advocate for the Respondent undertakes to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent within a period of 15 days from today. iv) Office to number the petition for statistical purpose. All office objections excluding court fees are disposed of. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]