IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2007 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 558 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18541/2006 Dated 30/11/2006 .................... PETITIONER/NOT A PARTY IN THE WRIT PETITION ------------------------------------------------------------ S.O.ANILKUMAR, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.SATHYA DAS, RESIDING AT ANIL BHAVAN, KURUVIKKODE, ELLUVILA (PO), NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL RESPONDENTS: PERSONS REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER COMPANY -------------------------------------------------------- 1. VILAYIL J.SHAJIKUMAR, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.V.S.JANARDHANAN NAIR, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.DATA WARE DESIGN LABS (P) LIMITED, TECHNO PARK CAMPUS, TRIVANDRUM, RESIDING AT VILAYIL VILLA, PARUMALA (P.O.), MANNAR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. VILAYIL J.SREEKUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O V.S.JANARDHANAN NAIR, DIRECTOR, M/S.DATA WARE DESIGN LABS (P) LIMITED, TECHNO PARK CAMPUS, TRIVANDRU, RESIDING AT VILAYIL VILLA, PARUMALA (PO), MANNAR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. V.S.JANADHANAN NAIR, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.SANKARA PILLAI, DIRECTOR, M/S.DATA WARE DESIGN LABS (P) LIMITED, TECHNO PARK CAMPUS, TRIVANDRUM, RESIDING AT VILAYIL VILLA, PARUMALA (P.O.), MANNAR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN SRI.S.SHYAM THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT SINCE RESPONDENTS HAVE DEPOSITED RS. 28 LAKHS AND HAVE ALSO FURNISHED SECURITY IN TERMS OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 3.7.2007, THOUGH VALUATION IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE LABOUR COURT, CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED. 5.12.2007 SD/-C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... C.O.(C) No.558 of 2007 .................................................................... Dated this the 26th day of May, 2009. JUDGMENT Since respondents have deposited the entire amount in terms of the award of the Labour Court, the Contempt case is closed leaving freedom to the petitioner to challenge the Labour Court award, if he is aggrieved. 2. If any amount deposited before the Labour Court is not released on account of stay granted by this court, then there will be direction to the Labour court to deposit such amounts in term deposits so that the deposit amount earns interest. The Labour Court is directed to transfer the amount and retain the deposit in a Nationalised Bank in term deposits. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms