IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27188 of 2011 Ram Bilash Sah Versus The State Of Bihar --------------------------------- 5. 14.12.2011. This has come at the instance of the petitioner. The petitioner was granted bail by this court vide order passed on 25.10.2011 subject to the condition that the person who had sworn the affidavit before this court, namely Ram Parikshan Sah who mentioned his relationship with the petitioner as being his uncle would stand as one of the bailor and would be under a duty to inform the court below in case this petitioner after his release in the present case is found involved or is made accused in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond and to take him into custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a supplementary affidavit in which it is that that the person Ram Parikshan Sah who had sworn the affidavit before this court is the own brother of the petitioner as is manifest from the parentage mentioned in the cause title 2 of the bail application as well as in the affidavit portion but due to inadvertence oversight and a typographical error, in place of the word „brother of the petitioner‟ the word „uncle of the petitioner‟ was mentioned in the affidavit. Learned counsel thus seeks modification of the order dated 25.10.2011 in the light of the aforesaid position Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the records of the proceedings, the last paragraph of the order dated 25.10.2011, stands modified to read as follow: “Considering the submission of learned counsel and the circumstances set forth, let the petitioner Ram Bilash Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Sakari P.S.Case No.81 of 2011, subject to the condition that Ram Parikshan Sah, the brother of the petitioner, who has sworn the affidavit before this court shall stand as one of the bailor and who shall be under a duty to inform the court below in case this petitioner 3 after his release in the present case is found involved or is made accused in any further case of similar nature and whereupon the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond and to take him into custody.” The order dated 25.10.2011 stands modified to the extent referred to above. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the court concerned by Fax at the cost of the petitioner. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)