l^ ^]^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. (S) NO. 8\5 (3 / 2011 Petitioner : / Vishnu Prasad Ghatpandey S/o. Shri Paharo Ram Ghatpandey Aged about 60 Years Working as Reader, Additional District Judge, District \\^S9V ^ and Sessions Court, Sakti, Dist.: Janjgir-Champa (CG). .0 .'.,• ^%>^' .;•^q^v" ^^" ^ f\,.-*' Respondents ^' VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Department of Law, Mantralaya, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. High Court of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Registrar General, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (CG). 3. The District and Sessions Court, Dist.: Janjgir-Champa (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA *<iHnr 5ta*ii<»> '3-sr T<ii^i<n<4, ^Til-(-i<i(o, |®tdl-y!j,< , 10 . f- C^J) lA^ . ^^<^/ / ^ 'W( 200 3TI^T TT5W (1?^^) 3TI^T "^T f<^icb "WT^Tr^T ^»yw Oeeptl '^HW ^rf?TT 3T^T SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan IShrivastava. JL 12.05-20T1 Shri N. Naha Roy, counsel for Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy advancecopy. Leamed counsel for the petiti^r of imposStion of penalty by respondt statutory departmentat appeai beforej the petitioner makes a iimited prayeij decided, as the same has remaim petitioner states that the petitioner is be directed to be decided as Aggrieved by order dated 1/7/| Judge, Janjgir-Champa, the petffiion^r appeat of the petitioner is still pendir(g inclined to pass any order as the in the month of August, 2010. The make appiication for eariy heanngl petitioner would be at liberty to take to him under the law, in case, he i< appeai or if his appeal is not decided. With the aforesaid observationls, fhe petitioner. ^dv. General for respondent No.1 on |ner submits that aggrieved by an order tnt No.3, the petitioner has preferred a respondent No.2. Learned counsel for that the appeai may be directed to be ^d pending. Learned counsel for the feoing to retjre, therefore, his appeal may eariy as|3osslbte. <»)i^i<n<^»i'w^?f ^f f^?t <r^^i< '^3tfiiH3TT^T appjeal ^p9, passed by the District and Sessions preferred an appeai on 5/8/10. The consjderation. At this stege, 1 am not itseif has been fiied by the petitiwier p^titioner may pursue his appeal. He may before the competent authorlfy. The I'ecourse to remedy as may be available aggrieved by the order passed in his , the petition Is finaity disposed oSf. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^