BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16925 of 2011 KANNAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOLAVANDAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.38/2010) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.38 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.M.Murugan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide any condition likely to be imposed against him and therefore, the anticipatory bail petition may be considered. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners and the other accused were wordy quarrel with the defacto complainant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and on further condition that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOLAVANDAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.45320 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16925 of 2011 Date :22/12/2011 RJ/26.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/