IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2010 / 2ND ASHADHA 1932 WA.No. 1046 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.143/2010 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER ------------------------ K.V.HAMSAKUTTY, S/O.VELUTTY ALIAS KHADER, KUMBALAPANTHALIL HOUSE, KARIMBA P.O., MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------------- 1. THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KANJIRAPPUZHA BRANCH, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA, KANJIRAPPUZHA BRANCH, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110 001 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR AC. BY SRI. T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN, ASG THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. --------------------------- W.A No. 1046 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. The grievance of the appellant is that he was declined the benefit under the Agricultural Debt Waiver Scheme by wrongly assuming that he is in possession of land above 5 acres. The learned Single Judge rejected the appellant's claim and hence this writ appeal before us. Even though the appellant contended that he is holding land of one acre, the learned standing counsel for the second respondent submitted that the appellant created equitable mortgage by deposit of title deed in respect of the property above 7 acres. We do not find any merit in the writ appeal. Consequently, the same is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (JUDGE ) P.S.GOPINATHAN (JUDGE ) vps WPC No. 2 WPC No. 3