HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH iBll.ASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri DilipRaosaheb Deshmukh, J. MiscellaneousADDeaKCl No.26/2008 Appellant : Ku. Kamla, Dto Shri Birsingh, aged about 22 years, resident of village- Sambalpur, Thana Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar(C.G.) Ui Respondents (Driver) (Owner) Versus 1. Narsingh S/o Late Shri Ghasi Ram, ByCaste-Raoyt, ResidentofVillage- Kanhargaon, Thana-Bhanupratappur, Distt.Kanker(C.G^ 2. Dharmendra Chopda, Son of Shrf Pukharaj Chopcla, Resident of Village Sambalpur, Thana Bhanupratappur, Distt,Kanker(C.Gj 3. The New India Insyrance Company Limited, Near Ghankar Cmama, Jagdatpur, Distt. jElgdatpur (C.G.) Miscellaneous aDDealunderSection 173ofthe MotorVehicle Act, 1988 Present: ShriR.S.Pafel,Counselfortheappellant. -I- fe: X ^~ • ORAL ORDER (Passedon11tnofJanuary,2008) Heard on I.A.No.01/2008 which is an application under Sectlon SofUmitationActforcondonationofdelayinfilingthisappeal. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the I.A., the delay in flling this appeal is condoned. 3. Heard on admission. 4. The appellant is aggrieved bythe award dated31 Augus(, 2007 in GlaimCase No.85/2007 passed by Additional MotorAccidents Ctaims Tribunal(F.T.e^, Kondagaon,Bastar(hereinafterreferrecltoas IHe MACT") whereby in a ease of slmple injury, compensation of Rs.2000/- has been awarded. N'. '••A \- 5. It is nptdisputed thatthe appellant ha^suffered only asim injury. Nomedical evidencewasadduced. 6. Having perused the impugned award, I am of the Considered opinionthatnogroundfprenhancementofGompensation is madeout. Accordingty,theapRealbeingdevoidofanymeritisdismissed. Sd/- Dflip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Kw *. ^ x / ' s', •••.a' : \-.