IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-19102 of 2010(O&M) DATE OF DECISION : February 08, 2012 Pramod Sharma ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.Davinider Bir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shekhar Mudgil, AAG, Haryana Mr.N.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant. Mr.Ashwani Verma, Advocate for respondent no.2. -- NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have effected a compromise, resultantly the petitioner has been discharged and hence this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondent has admitted the above facts. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) February 08, 2012 JUDGE p.singh