:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1928 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1928 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1928 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO. 495 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO. 495 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO. 495 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1529 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1529 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1529 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 1571 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 1571 OF 2004 SUIT NO. 1571 OF 2004 Oyster Shipping Line (UK) Ltd. .. Appellant and Another. Vs. S.K.Networks Company Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Mrs. Venita Davar i/b. V.K.Rambhadran for the Appellant. None for the Respondents. ----- CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents, though served. Perused the affidavit of service in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) :2: (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)