IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1473 of 2009 BRAHASPATI DOME @ BRIHASPATI DOME @ BIHASPATI DOME, son of Chhotan Dome, resident of Ambedkar Colony Nala Road, P.S. Kadamkuan District – Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 06.02.2009 Heard. The case was initially registered under sections 307 and 400 of the IPC and sections ¾ of Explosive Substances Act. Charges have been framed as may appear from the report submitted by the trial court under sections 400 and 286 of I.P.C. and section 3 of Explosive Substances Act . As may appear from the earlier rejection order, contained in Annexure 1, petitioner along with some of his companions had eaten and drunk and the petitioner, after having picked up a jhola containing some bombs, started with his companions for committing serious crime. The bomb exploded and that caused injuries to the petitioner and others. The contention is that petitioner is in custody since 19.7.2007 and the trial has not started. The report of the court below indicates that charges have been framed and the date fixed for recording evidence was 2.2.2009. The court believes that the learned trial judge shall expedite the hearing in the trial (S.T. No. 107 of 2008 pending in the court of Vth Addl. Sessions Judge, Patna) and conclude it within a reasonable period of time. Petition is dismissed. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)