ASN 1 PIL-92.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 92 OF 2009 Manubhai Paragji Vashi. ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respopndents. Mr.Santosh Nawate for the Petitioner. Mr.M.D.Naik,AGP. for the State. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. AND D. G. KARNIK, J. Thursday, 24th March, 2011 PC : In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has made a grievance about the alleged discrimination in the fee structure for the aided section and unaided section in the five year and three year law course in the Government Law College, Bombay. It appears that as far as students studying in aided section of the college are concerned, they are only required to pay fees of Rs.6000/- to 7000/- per annum. The students studying in the unaided section are required to pay the fees in the range of Rs.12,000/- to 13,000/- per annum. 2 In the affidavit in reply dated 11th March, 2010 filed by Mr. Prakash K. Mokal, Incharge Principal, Government Law College indicates that sufficient justification has been given for prohibiting such different fee structure. ASN 2 PIL-92.sxw 3 Having gone through the said reply affidavit, we are of the view that the fee structure framed by the College does not call for any interference. Hence, petition is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE D.G. KARNIK, J.