[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1229/2005 DAYANAND PUBLIC SENIOR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. DATE: 29.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. R.P. Garg for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. J.P. Sharma for the respondent No.2. **** The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner Dayanand Public Senior Higher Secondary School, Jaipur against the impugned judgment dated 31.03.2004 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Criminal Case No. 45/1991, whereby the accused-respondent No.2 Bhanu Pratap Chauhan has been acquitted from the offences under Sections 408, 467, 468, 471 and 380 IPC. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the accused-respondent has wrongly been acquitted from the offences under Sections 408, 467, 468, 471 and 380 IPC. It is also stated at bar that money has been deposited and the accused-respondent Bhanu Pratap Chauhan has been terminated from service. [2] Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and upon careful perusal of the impugned judgment dated 31.03.2004, since the prosecution utterly failed to prove the guilt against the accused- respondent for the aforesaid offences and as per the evidence, it is not proved that Rs. 4,400/- were given to the accused-respondent to deposit the same in the bank and when it were deposited and for how many days this amount was retained by the accused-respondent, therefore, as the prosecution failed to prove its case against the accused- respondent, therefore, benefit of doubt has been given to the accused-respondent and he has been acquitted from the offences under Section 408, 467, 468, 471 and 380 IPC vide impugned judgment dated 31.03.2004. This Court do not find any illegality or error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned judgment dated 31.03.20024 which requires any interference by this Court. Consequently, the criminal revision petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. Record be sent back. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/