“ H TO‘T R.\ IGH COUR F‘CHHA‘TTISGARH‘A’ VBILASPU ’BLE MRSATISHKAGNIHOTRI ,“ETT‘sggL_2oo¢ h IRITBIIONof I KO S/O LA RI CCHCKO AGED ABOUT 3 ARS RO B-lO HOUSING OAR OLONY ALC AGA DISTRICT KOR ( TATE OF CHHAS HROUG PRINCIP‘ ECRETAR NDUSTRIE DEPARTMENT GVT O)“, ‘ _ CHEATTISGARH DKs E VAN RAIPURC A ANL CHAC TE SH PA 2' YE / Z BD C BO NK EA C VERSUS 4 ~ 1) S TTIGARH“ TH ‘ , SY IS (G) EERAL MAN NDUSTRIES CENTRE DISTT K0RBAC (G) ) SHANKAR LAL SHARM, S ATE MANGATH RAM SARMA, GED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/ HUNJHUNWL COMPLEX, EHR OA KORE S OREA CG 4 ARMA S/OL, .SAR D AT 28 Y “J A, IST KOREA (c G I i i S l, V M : r v, hn ‘ a r I -" ) RAJESH KUMAR SH, HANK LAL SHARMA AGE: BOU EARS R/O UNJUNWALA COMPLEX KORE : STS PONDEN mt; Fouz uza, Advocate for the petmone Shn Utkars ‘ , Deputy Government Advocate'fo Ilo‘ 1 a ‘v : S.B._ HON ’ Jr \Z ) GN AGER, I 3 O \V .L ‘ ’A O; JAA DI RD A, DIT‘ K () 'L D , ) I nd , , 0 Lea pp h h6 rned counsei aeanng for the petmoner submlts tat t pellate authomy v1de order dated 03 07 2004 (Annexure /l ap P 1) has recor h Kmma m / Al u‘‘aruSha‘I are‘:paefs oyf’th‘evpetmoner firm Ms. m EgjgWs Kb, 1 h’inee’rinfork, ora \h pt k k Te etlloner sees perrmssmn of thls Court to mae reresentatlon bcfore the respondent no 2 for appropnate rehe c the lea-med counsel aearmg for the responents ave no oJectlon However, 1 ls qene y the learned counse eanng for the respondent no 3 and 4 that such representatlon sh g h ould be deetded after affordm opportumty of hearmg to te . p d artles concerne I tw g h hb 37 to make reresentation to respondent no 2 and the same shall be ~ etded 1n accordance wtth§ law alter affordlng proper z' / I pportunrty ofhearmg to the concerned partres Within a penod of x weeks. si I he order dated 14 02 2007 passed m W P No 228/2007 (M/s ml Engmeermg Works Vs §tate of Chhattrsgarh & Others) erem, the respondent no 2 as dlrected to consrder and decide reset ‘11 Engmeenng Works wrthm a ,i the enrnanon of M/s? A ded that Shn Shankar Lal Shanna and Shn Rajcs t n Ve ofthe foreomg, thts petmon ls dlsposed of w1t a erty ' l i r n \ ./y .. r _ _ ‘ (Passed 01121“ of March 207) Ep f to winh pp d h b t ontdd b l ‘ app 1 p de o T " A Wh pmi<jd of fbur .weéks from the datelof receipt of aw’cojay; 9f th rder, thg said order s proauced before thié Court. It i‘s' submifte o i d b s 7 y‘th‘e learned cognsel for the partigs‘ that both ‘thefreprewntatign >rpursua1’1t t6 this order ’as well Lacs tha order dated 14.02200 passed in W.P, 228?200_7’, be eonsidére'dr and decided together ubject to the abovetmas an cenditions. s e d n View ofthe above, the betjtion stands s . No rerel I dispoed of odas o Costs. e , ‘ t