1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4087 OF 2008 Dilip Sopal Sahakari Motor Vyavasaik Sanstha Maryadit .. Petitioner. Vs. Patoda Taluka Dudh Vyavasaik Sahakari Sansthancha Dudh Utpadak and Puravatha Sangh Ltd. Patoda, .. Respondents. Mr.M.S.Karnik for the petitioner. Mrs.Pornima Kaluse i/b J.G.Reddy for the respondents. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 27TH JULY, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned an order dated 26.3.2008 by which the judgment and order dated 8.8.2006 in dispute No.230 of 2005 has been stayed pending hearing and final disposal of the appeal No.55 of 2008. The petitioner has also impugned an order dated 26.3.2008 passed by the Co-operative Appellate Court condoning the delay in filing appeal No.55 of 2008. Mr.Karnik, learned counsel for the petitioner does not seriously press the petition against the order condoning the delay in filing the appeal and even I do not find any reason to interfere with the order in extremely limited 2 jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: The Co-operative Appellate Court shall endeavour to decide appeal No.55 of 2008 challenging the judgment and order dated 8.8.2006 passed in Dispute No.230 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioner to produce a copy of this order before the Co-operative Appellate Court within a period of two weeks from today. The Co-operative Appellate Court shall decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned orders. All contentions on merits of the case are kept open. With these directions the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)