IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.449 of 2007 DATE OF ORDER: 29.1.2007 Ram Parsad ...Petitioner(s) Versus Harjit Singh ....Respondent(s) CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*. Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate. M.M. AGGARWAL,J This is petition against order dated 27.11.2006 passed by Rent Controller, Ludhiana whereby Rent Controller had assessed provisional rent and had directed the tenant, now petitioner to pay Rs.43,500/- in all i.e rent for 39 months @ 1000/- per month, interest @ 6 % per annum and then costs. Counsel for the petitioner argues that in some earlier petition, rent was Rs.200/- only and that also had been paid and no rent is due. I have gone through the detailed order and do not find good ground to interfere. This petition is dismissed with the observation that if ultimately C.R.No.449 of 2007 #2# it is found that some access rent has been paid then that will be recoverable/adjustable against the future rent, which tenant may have to pay. January 29, 2007 ( M.M. AGGARWAL ) manoj JUDGE