IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5003 of 2010() ----------------------------- CMP.2037/2010 of D.C & SESSIONS COURT,TRIVANDRUM CRIME NO. 182/2010 OF NEYYARDAM POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED : ------------------------------ SURESH MUMAR @ MOHANAN NAIR, S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, KUNNUPURAM, PACHAKKADU, KUTTICHAL, KODDIDI MURI, MANNOORKARA VILLAGE FORM KALLURETHU VEEDU, NEAR SIVA TEMPLE ELLAMKAVU, KONNI P.O.KONNI TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESETNED BY PUBLIC PROSEUCTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY SRI. C.S.HRITHWIK, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 5003 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.182/2010 of Neyyardam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 457, 461 and 394 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 23.06.2010. The petitioner was arrested on 04.07.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ln.