1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2700 OF 2003 State Bank of India. … Plaintiff. Versus Shivnath S. Purohit & Anr. .… Defendants. Mr. Vivek Sawant i/b K Kaushik for the Plaintiff. CORAM: V.M.KANADE, J. DATED: 9TH MARCH, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff. Pursuant to the directions given by this Court, Plaintiff has also served the Advocate on record for Defendant No.2 with the Summons for judgment and affidavit in support. Accordingly, Defendant No.2 has been served and affidavit of service has been filed. Inspite of service of the Summons for judgment, none appears on behalf of the Defendants. Plaintiff therefore is entitled for the judgment and decree. Averments made in the Summons for judgment are not denied. Suit of the 2 Plaintiff therefore is decreed. The Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are jointly and severally to pay to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,06,255/- alongwith interest at the rate of 13.5% per annum from the date of the filing of the suit till payment and/or realization of the entire decretal amount along with costs. Refund of court fees be paid according with rules. 2 Certified copy is expedited. (V.M. KANADE, J.)