1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1607 OF 2010 Rajendra G. Gadge & Others Vs. Santosh G. Nikam & Another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Shri Sudhir Malode Adv for petitioner. CORAM: .B. P. DHARMADHIKARI J. Dated: 21 st SEPTEMBER, 2010. Heard Shri Malode learned counsel for petitioner. There is no appearance for respondents 1 and 2 though they are served. Upon oral request, Shri Malode learned counsel seeks leave to join S. D. O. Morshi as party respondent. Leave granted. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. Learned AGP Shri Joshi waives notice for added respondent. 2] The contention of Shri Malode is the added respondent has while functioning as Revisional Authority under the provisions of Mamlatdar Courts Act dismissed the revision only after recording rival 2 contentions and without giving any reasons. 3] I perused the impugned order with his assistance. Paragraph 1 mentions the fact of order passed by Naib Tahsildar, in paragraph 2 the facts giving rise to disputes are stated, in paragraph 3 the issuance of notice and filing of written arguments is mentioned, in paragraph 4 thereafter the S. D. O. has stated that, he has perused the record and he found orders of Naib Tahsildar dated 2nd April 2008 proper. What were contentions raised and what bearing they had on facts or on impugned order of Mamlatdar is no were discussed. 4] Thus the order is unreasoned, hence said order dated 31st July 2009 passed by respondent no.3 is quashed and set aside. Proceedings are restored back to file for taking appropriate decision in accordance with law. Said proceedings are expedited and respondent no.3 shall attempt to decide the matter afresh as early as possible and in any case by 31st March 2011. Rule made absolute accordingly with no orders as to costs. Certified copy expedited. JUDGE svk 3 4 5 6