•~< •'oMls:, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.t WRIT PETITION N0.f6<§8 QF^006 PETITIONER .>.••'' ^^^••-^. '(^?5> »•*•* ....'•-'^y<^ , •^-•"^sss'y"'" ^^yr~^^ A3a" RESPONDENTS 1. ^ ^ !-2( 1YA^f Janaklal Gupta, Sonof Shri Triloki Sao, aged about 54 years, Resident of Police Station Tapkara, District Jashpur (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Director General of Police, Raipur (C.G.). The Inspector General of Police, Surguja Range, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4. The Superintendent of Police, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.). 5. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.). 2. 3. WRIT _PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSHTUTION OF INDIA. 1950. FOR ISSUANCE OFWRIT IN THE NATURE _QF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS, ETC. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 1638 of 2006 Petitioner Janaklal Gupta Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and ofhers. Sia^e Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Aguihotei. Shri Uttam Paadey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Goveminent Advocate for the rcspondente. ORAL ORDER (31st March, 2006) The followiag order of fhe Court was passed by Satlsh K. Agnihotrl, J. 1. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner siibmits on uistruction that the petitioner be pennitted to wifhdraw fhis petition with liberty to ffle fi-esh petition, to which leamed counsel for the respondents has no Qbjection. 2. In ?iew offhe above, the writ petition is disiaissed as wifhdiawn wifh the above stated liberti', No oixler as to costs, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Bablu