IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38728 of 2008 RANJAN MAHTO @ RANJAN KUMAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 379 and 411 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the allegation of theft electrical wire is by a co-villager and not by the State authorities. The seizure list states that the wire was of copper when the State uses aluminum wire for electricity transmission. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM Danapur in Naubatpur PS Case No. 59 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)