/'^•' -HC—78 \ ^5^ ^|A||<^A|, giTTiy'ie, f^ray ^t..j3^.y^ 317^?T TfW (Tpfg^t?) an^rw R-fi* ^qiSII^TsiTqW •^iwsfei aiiiw PETITIONER <*i^f<-f41-< tiwciftf.fs'st'ri^re ^•sTfgirsn^i raran, S/o Sonau Ram Sahu. Vill. & Post Ba^buda, Thana Kasdol, The. Baloda Basar, Itnct h:aipur(CG). -Versus- |te of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretarv. *pei|iartmentofHoms, D.K.S. Bha-ivan, Raipur (C^). 2. Surierintendent of Police. Raiour <CG). 3. Stal >n?|on House Officer, Kasdol, Teh. Baloda r, Ratpur (CG). !'bte_Shri L.C. Bhadoo & Hon'b.'s Shri SUR!' Ku.Tia^r Ssnha. 22-1-2008 This is an office reference. Shri A!i Asaar. Advocate acjpears as amicus curiae on behaif of the Shri J.T. Giida, Addi. Advocat Heard. Leamed Addl. Advocate Gleneral submits that the resoonse has already been filed on behalf of th^ State/respondents. He further submits that instead of sfforts so far the^ have not been able to trace out the whereabouts of the daughter of the <|;omplainant nameiv. Rameshwari. When it wias enquired from ^hri Aii Asgar, learned amicus curiae. he submits that the compiainant contacted him in the month of December. 2005 .<<^< ;'ir..: Srrfjg^WHC-^ ve-v J ^ '"^f.f/ ' Tc^ r<il^l(7iAI, ffTflti'lti, Rfriltiy LJ.P-NO . [^^^l^oS an^?r ww (i^f-iisiiy?) 3l]^?I?iTl?;iRT n<ff aii^r g?qN? ,u^ u ?BITCR ^rfl^ sn^r -2-- and thereafter he is not contacting month has eiapsed. !t seems that redressing his grievance, the contractina the amicus curiae in orck Sn vlew of the above. we compiainant namely, Diiharan is therefore. the matter is closed and him. Since then for about 2 years and 1 Itie complainanWs no more interested in realsons are best known to him for not to assist the Court. fcre of the considered opinion that the hot interested in pursuina the matter, the office is directed to consign th®case Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo ie i>i<i!ii<ili^iii<A" tf,fsi^ <H><^i< ^aiRrirsn^i Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge