CR No.1238 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1238 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 24.2.2010 Balbir Singh and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus Nachattar Kaur ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate for the petitioners. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) CM No.4688-CII of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CR No.1238 of 2010(O&M) This is defendants' revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 4.2.2010 whereby their application for adducing additional evidence has been rejected by the trial Court. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the additional evidence sought to be produced is very material for the just decision of the case and the non- production of the same was unintentional and therefore, it will be in the interest of justice to grant one adequate opportunity to the petitioner to adduce the additional evidence. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the averments made in this petition as well as the impugned order. From the perusal of the same, I find that the petitioners were granted as many as 6 opportunities; however, they failed to bring any evidence except examining one witness. Admittedly, copy of Rapat Roznamcha No.279 CR No.1238 of 2010(O&M) 2 dated 30.12.2004 sought to be proved by way of additional evidence is already on record yet no steps were taken by the petitioners to prove the same while leading their evidence in the affirmative. Not only this, vide order dated 6.10.2009 evidence of the petitioners was closed by order of the Court. The aforesaid order was never challenged by the petitioners. Now, the case is at the fag end and in fact stood fixed on 18.2.2010 for arguments of the parties. In view of the aforesaid facts, I find no ground to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. February 24, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE