IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-20975 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.9.2009 Sandeep and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Yashwinder Paul singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana for the State. .... MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that initially the case was registered under Sections 323/324/506/34 IPC and the petitioners remained in custody on that account. Subsequently, they were enlarged on bail but addition of offence under Section 307 IPC to the array of offences gave rise to the apprehension that they shall be arrested again. He has also raised a contention they never abused the concession of bail and that the matter has now been settled inter se between the parties. Noticing the above said contentions, on 3.8.2009 this court granted interim protection to the petitioners subject to the Crl.Misc.No.M-20975 of 2009 (O&M) -2- condition that they join the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. It has now been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners and not disputed by the learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Rajinder Singh that the petitioners have joined the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is allowed and the interim directions dated 3.8.2009 are hereby made absolute till the filing of the challan subject to the condition that the petitioners continue to comply with the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 23.9.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss