CR 64/09 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.64/2009 Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. Mohini Devi and another Date of Order :: 29th July,2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal Mr. Prahlad Sharma, for petitioner. ....... By the Court :- This civil revision petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short CPC) has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 31/3/2009 passed by Additional District Judge No.7, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Misc. Appeal No.69/2007 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 15/5/2007 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.3, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Case No.21/2007 has been dismissed by which the application of the petitioner under section 47, 141 & Order 21 Rule 99 & 101 of CPC was dismissed. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned judgment and other material placed on the record. 3. The petitioner is the son of judgment debtor against whom a decree of eviction has been passed on CR 64/09 (2) 30/1/1997. Now after ten years of passing of the decree the petitioner has filed objection in the execution petition that he is actual tenant in the suit premises but he failed to produce any documentary evidence in regard of his tenancy and payment of rent. The trial court dismissed the objection with the observation that the said objection has been filed with a view to delay the execution proceedings and the first appellate court also considered the matter in detail and rightly dismissed the appeal. I do not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned judgment and order. 4. Consequently, this civil revision petition is hereby dismissed. (J.R. Goyal),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D47