IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2010 / 2ND ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 555 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7930/2010 Dated 11/03/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------------------- M/S.MIR REALTORS PVT.LTD., 1ST FLOOR, MM BUILDINGS, NEAR NORTH TOWN HALL, ERNAKULAM-682018 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.ARUN KUMAR K., S/O.A.K.RAGHAVAN NAMBIAR, AGED 43 YEARS. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------- K.ABDUL NAZAR, AGED 49, S/O.KOYA, SECRETARY, THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KAKKANADU P.O., ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-30, RESIDING AT THERUVIL HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA, ALUVA. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN, SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Cont Case (C) NO. 555 OF 2010 (S) ======================== Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Non compliance of Annexure A6 judgment directing implementation of Ext.P2 is what is complained of in this petition. 2. Today, when the matter came up, counsel for the Panchayat informed that permission in pursuance to A6 has been granted to the petitioner and that the petitioner has started trenching work. Now that permission has been granted by the Panchayat, and as it is open to the petitioner to continue work on that basis, this contempt is closed recording the said submission. 3. Petitioner has a further complaint about the amount that they had to pay as restoration fee. If the petitioner has any grievance about the amount demanded and paid, it is clarified that it will be open to the petitioner to agitate the same in appropriate proceedings. Contempt case is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp