1N THE HONABLE HIGH COURT OF JU W. P. No..................8 . .............. DICATURE 2005 OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR cc. PETITIONERN...“ ................. Brijlal Sahu aged 65 years s/o Budhram Sahu, Retired Head Master, Middle School, Chendriban Nawagaon .O.Tatenga Tahsil Dondi District Dutg (C.G.).‘ //,~Versus ‘K Respondent ...... ’ Wg§f§o...... l. The State Government of Chhattishgarh. d ‘ ’ Through the Comissioner, School 6 “7 ‘C;§13‘3* D.K.s., Education Bhavan, , Ministry, Raipur (C.G.) /2L The District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) . /3. The Block Education Officer, Dondi Lohara, District Durg (CG) XI-HC—78 WW,m1-gr,f%lamgt WT m”. ;pn{.\£Qu o H mamma-iam) 7g 2W5 .ooo.ooo E1 200 ’ WWW WWW www§rwm I %311%wai1%sr y . k counsel for the petitioner. PaneLLaWyer, for the State onadvanee f the petitioner is that the records or the 308/2000 filed before the State pur has‘ not been received or transferred led counsel for the petitioner makes a ly the records of the Said'original lsferred rmmihe state Administrative disposed of in accordance subinits that sincegthe $.13 V impediment in transferring th to be transferred in a routine r State Counsel does ni counsel for the petitioner._ The prayer is allowed. Let the records ‘ of 0. High Court from S.A.T., Raip The petition stands fina Certified copy as per ru mwm 16.{}3.20% Shri Agay Sln‘ivastava Shri Akhii Agrawal, 'copy. * R I Heard. The main grisvance 0 originai application No. Administrative TribunaL Rai to this Cami till date. Lsait limited prayer that presem application bevcalled or trai Tribunal, bench at Raiptlrz its early as possible andith‘e matter be with law. Counsel for the petitioner .T. has been abolished, there is no 3 matter to this Court as the matters are lalmSr; 9t oppose the limited prayer made by A. No.308/2000 be transferred to the Jr. 11y disposed of. ’ i’” 7/ Sdl‘ les. SUN‘L “mg some Judge