1 BA 610.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 610 OF 2011 Dilya Trimbak Bhosale. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. D.D. Khamkar for the Applicant. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the State. CORAM : A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 9th JUNE 2011. P.C. :- Heard Mr. Khamkar, leaned Advocate for the Applicant and Mrs. Mulekar, learned APP for the State. 2. The Applicant was arrested in C.R. No.170 of 2000 on 5.5.2008. Initially, 14 persons were arrested in the course of investigation of the said C.R. and the Applicant was shown as absconding. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed and case was committed to the Court of Sessions. It was numbered as Sessions Case No.155 of 2007. After the arrest of the Applicant, the Police filed a supplementary charge- sheet and the said case was also committed to the Court of Sessions. 2 BA 610.11.sxw 3. Mr. Khamkar has pointed out that though the FIR mentioned only about four offenders, who were unknown to the first informant, after investigation, total 15 persons came to be arrested as the culprits. He, however, submits that there is no material in the entire charge-sheet to connect the Applicant with the alleged offences. According to him, neither the Applicant is identified as one of the culprits, nor any property, or weapon, is recovered from, or at his instance. 4. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor is unable to show any material in the charge-sheet which would connect the Applicant with the alleged offences. 5. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to release the Applicant on bail. 6. The Applicant is ordered to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/-, with one surety in like amount. (A.M. THIPSAY,J.)