IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42178 of 2009 MEGHAN MAHTO @ MEGHANA son of Gahan Mahto, resident of village Simariaghat, Bind Toli, P.S. Bahraini (Chakia O.P.), District Begusarai…. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… …OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the State: Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, APP ----------- 3 18.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation set up in the first information report, the petitioner along with other co- accused persons tried to rob of the informant at the gun point, however, he escaped and had identified the miscreants including the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the first information itself goes to show that the attempt of robbery was foiled. It is further submitted that the co- accused Khokhala Bind, Bhadai Bind and Umesh Bind, have already been acquitted of the charges vide order dated 29th July, 2006 passed by the concerned court. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 16.10.2008. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, MEGHAN MAHTO @ MEGHANA, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri S.N. Ram, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai, in Barauni (Chakiya) Police Station Case No. 360/04 with further condition that one of the bailors must the father of the petitioner. Further, after his release, if the petitioner is again found involved in similar kind of offences, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date in course of trial before the court concerned. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates in course of trial without any reasonable cause shown by him, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)