^. v IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. 3)^--?' OF 2006 BEN! PETITIONER \°^^••••'""^ r^-<^>-^' Smt. Ramin Thakur, aged '''.."••<^--'" about 42 years Wife of Shri ^•'^"<5'S%-''i'""" -...••*"* .€.^'^^<il"lQ...-"'"" D. D. Thakur, ..'^•-"^^^'y-'"'" -- z' .. ~'. -.. ""'""'. :?C.-.o<*6AU>^o>y'" "" Superintendent, Girls Hostel "t«9^", ...--"" Lanjoda, Block Pharasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.). ?.-•" •-Xls^"" ^^i^^ i'fe>V>/ !j »>.,.*'—;'''.?s // 'ffifss:'^' ^^y RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal f!" Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Block Education Officer, ^' Block Pharasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATU RE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. 3:^'^raR;pr, atn«'iis,<2idw.4,< &£ * *<f * * •»-S^.«/< <J»4 Sll^l iq<n (4<<^<!<<{liT) 3TI^rwf?WK tW 311^1 *41cB *wr<-<4).< tll^dTifte'^1 <fa+<;K ^sri^irsnSRT ?^nWflfef311^!T Shri P.P. Sahu, counse! fo ' the petitioner. The main grievance of t Shri Ashutosh Kachhav|@ha, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents. Heard. that even though she was transl Giris Hostef, Lojanda and she ie petitioner raised in this writ petition is terred vide order dated 21.8.2003, she is not being reiieved to join at the n^w place of posting. The petitioner'scase is fiat she is working as Superintendent of has been transferred vide order dated 21.8.2003 along with other 12^ persons vide Annexure-P/1. She has been transferred as Block Educ^tion Officer, Kanker but shs is not being relieved in pursuance of the tra several requests but she is not bl nsfer order dated 21.8.2003. She made >ing relieved. Learned counsel for th^ petitioner submitted that transfer order dated 21.8.2003 whereby the p^titioner was transferred to Kanker has not been cancelled or modified and to make any statement about facts and circumstances ofthe it is still in existence but she is notbeing relieved. Learned counse! for resp|ondents, at this stag®,is not in a position the transfer order, whether same is in existence or canceiled or modifi^d or not. Having heard learned co^insei for the parties, having regard to the transfer order dated21.8.2003 ijs said to be in existence and the petitioner is not being relieved,therefore| petitioner has not been canc^ [:ase and having regard to the fact that the it is directed that if transfer order of the tted or modified and she has not been reiieved in pursuance of the s^id transfer order, ttien respondents shall r "i\ ,-' XI-HC-78 3^"ilHl^, ^tiiid, faaray *ii*<ni awra? ••••••••••.•.........^q. 200 3<i^i <iac»)(li°li^°f^!ir) wR-fi* 1^1 sb4k Ban/e S^TTWHferan^r wife^rwRrftftecAriSFRK ^aTRmsn^r reiieve the petitioner within a peri|od of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. However, i): is made clear that if the order dated 21.8.2003 has been cancelle(| or modified, then this order shali automaticaliy have no force. With the direction aforesai<p, the petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certped copy ofthis order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge