IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 19989 of 2008 Between: G.Neeraja, D/o. G.Sanjeeva Reddy Chilakaladona(V) Mantralayam(M) Kurnool District being a Major Rep.by her Father G.Sanjeeva Reddy ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Secretary C.B.S.E N.V Cell D.No.1-2 J.P Extention Industrial Area Near Gajipur(V) Bus Stand Patpargang Delhi -110092 2 The Deputy Commissioner Navodaya Vidyalaya Samithi 1-1-10/3 S.P Road Secunderabad 500003 3 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Banavasi (V) Yemmiganur(M),Kurnool rep.by its Principal .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not giving admission to the petitioner G.Neeraja(Roll No.M3710) in to VI Class in 3rd respondent School as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to give admission to the petitioner G.Neeraja(Roll No.M3710) in to VI Class in 3rd respondent School. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.A.CHAYA DEVI The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 19989 of 2008 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not giving admission to the petitioner in 6th class in 3rd respondent-school is arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner was seeking admission to the petitioner for the year 2008-2009 which was over long back and as such there is no scope for granting the relief as prayed for. Moreover, pursuant to the interim directions granted by this Court, the 3rd respondent by letter dated 30.10.2008 informed the petitioner that the errors pointed out were already corrected in the alpha code given to the petitioner and that the petitioner was not qualified under Rural General Quota. In the circumstances, if aggrieved it is for the petitioner to challenge the said proceedings by working out the appropriate remedy as available under law. Accordingly, granting leave and liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 02-07-2009 KLP