IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7631 of 2011 UMESH SINGH YADAV @ UMESH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 27.04.2011. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and after having perused the rejection order what appears is that the Sessions Judge had given a particular time frame for conclusion of the trial to the Magistrate and that time frame of three months has not been observed. The petitioner was named by the co- accused who was caught at the spot and the witnesses examined in paragraphs cited by the court below in the rejection order state the same facts, considering which, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Kargahar(Sidhi)P.S.Case No.5 of 2009 arising out of G.R.No.96 of 2009. The explanation submitted by the court below is accepted. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)