Crl. Misc. No.M-23000 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Crl. Misc. No.M-23000 of 2011 Manpreet Singh ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..... Respondent 2. Crl. Misc. No.M-23556 of 2011 Gurmeet Kaur alias Mandeep Kaur ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..... Respondent 3. Crl. Misc. No.M-24256 of 2011 Tamanna Bansal and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents 4. Crl. Misc. No.M-25221 of 2011 Pritam Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ..... Respondent Date of Decision: 23.09.2011 CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner. (in CRM Nos.M-23000 & 23556 of 2011) Crl. Misc. No.M-23000 of 2011 -2- Mr. A.A. Pathak, Advocate, for the petitioners. (in CRM No.M-24256 of 2011) Mr. S.S. Siao, Advocate, for the petitioner. (in CRM No.M-25221 of 2011) Mr. Arshvinder Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. M.M.S. BEDI, J. Sunita Devi had registered a case alleging that she had purchased a house from Tamanna Bansal on 9.06.2010 and said Tamanna Bansal purchased the said property from Mandeep Kaur wife of Manpreet Singh. As a matter of fact, the property vested in the first wife of Manpreet Singh whose name was Mandeep Kaur. She had died on 20.04.1998. Her property was sold by the second wife of Manpreet Singh by changing her name from Gurmeet Kaur to Mandeep Kaur. On the basis of the allegations of Sunita Devi, Gurmeet Kaur, Tamanna Bansal her husband Rakesh Kumar and one Pritam Singh who is the Lambardar had been made accused. All the accused have filed the application for pre-arrest bail. In view of the said circumstances, CRM No.23000 of 2011, CRM No.M-23556 of 2011, CRM No.M-24256 of 2011 and CRM No.M-25221 of 2011 are hereby taken together as they arise out of same FIR. It has been informed that the property has now been reverted back to the Manpreet Singh and two children of Mandeep Kaur (deceased) and the sale consideration paid by complainant and Tamanna Bansal has been returned. The petitioners have joined investigation. It is ordered that in case of arrest of petitioners in all the abovesaid petitions, they will be released on Crl. Misc. No.M-23000 of 2011 -3- bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting officer subject to the condition that petitioners will join investigation as and when required and they will not tamper with the evidence and hamper the investigation in any manner. Disposed of. (M.M.S. BEDI) 23.09.2011 JUDGE manju