1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6404 of 2011 alongwith CWP Nos. 6408, 6411, 6432, 6533, 6606 & 6633 of 2011. Decided on: 17.8.2011 1. CWP No. 6404 of 2011. Pyar Singh & ors. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2. CWP No. 6408 of 2011. Anita Kumari Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 6411 of 2011. Kulwant Singh Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 6432 of 2011. Santosh Kumari Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 5. CWP No. 6533 of 2011. Satish Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 6606 of 2011. Gian Chand Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 7. CWP No. 6633 of 2011. Jeet Ram Vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. 2 For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate in CWP Nos. 6404 & 6533 of 2011. : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate in CWP No. 6408 of 2011. : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate in CWP No. 6411 of 2011. : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate in CWP No. 6432 of 2011. : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate in CWP Nos. 6606 & 6633 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents- State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This issue pertaining to vacation salary to contract teachers is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st 3 September, 2008 and the judgment has become final. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to release eligible vacation salary, during the entire service period, to the petitioners in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. If the amounts are not disbursed, as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 2. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 17, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.