1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1881 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 2086 OF 1992 Mrs. Sheila Nanik Ramchandani ...Plaintiffs versus Kishore s/o Late Nanik Ramchandani.....Defendant Mr. R. Narula with A. Dasgupta i/b Jhangiani Narula for the plaintiff. Ms. K.C. Nichunt for defendant. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 17TH APRIL, 2008. P.C.: 1. In an earlier round of litigation, the parties to the present suit entered into a compromise. Consent Terms were filed, which were signed by the advocate for the present defendant. With a view to enforce the consent terms, the present suit has been filed. During pendency of the suit, by the present Chamber Summons, the plaintiff is seeking direction against the defendant to produce the correspondance exchanged between the defendant and his earlier advocate by name Shri A.C.Kotwani. By filing affidavit -in-reply the defendant has claimed previlage in regard to certain correspondance between the client and the counsel. However, the learned advocate appearing for the defendant in all fairness states that defendant is ready and willing to give inspection of four documents mentioned in Annexure -I at serial Nos. 1 to 4. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff is satisfied with the assurance/disclosure made by the defendant of the said documents. 2 The learned counsel for the defendant also agrees to hand over zerox copies of the said documents so also the documents mentioned in affidavit-in-reply in regard to which no previlage has been claimed. The disclosure shall be subject to paragraphs 9 and 10 of the reply. Chamber Summons is thus disposed of,. The document in regard to which inspection would be given by the defendant to the plaintiff shall be produced at the time of trial. (A.P. DESHPANDE J.)