^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Second Appeal No. 32 of 2007 Appellants (Plaintiffsl 1. Janohar Goand, S/o Shahorik, Age-about 38 years, 2. Shukalu, S/o Govind kewet, Age-about 52 years, 3. Dukalu, S/o Govind kewat, Age-about 48 years, 4. Rangi S/o Ganpat kewat, Age-about 49 years, All appellant no.1 to 4 R/o Viltage, Poundhi Tahsil - Bilha Goadh Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents : 1. letwari S/o Rame, Aged S/o 53 years, (Defendantl Village Poundhi Tahsil - Bhila Goad 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) Second Appeal underSection 100 Read with Order 41 Rule 1 & 2 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure Present- Shri Vijay Deshmukh counsel for the appellants ORAL ORDER (Passedon19.11.2007) Heard on admission. 2. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgmentand decree dated 14.09.2006 passed by 4th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Appeal No. 20-A of 2005 whereby the judgment and decree dated 14.06.2004 passed in Civil Suit No.87-A of 2001 by 9th Civil Judge, Class-ll, Bilaspur for —-^ permanent injunction on the basis of possession was dismissed by the trial Court, was affirmed. 3. Both the courts below have on proper appreciation of evidence, oral as well as documentary, recorded a finding that the plaintiffs were not in possession of the suit land and were disentitled to the relief sought for. The finding recorded by both the Courts below is purely a finding of fact. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises for determination of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal being devoid of merit is dismissed at the stage of admission. 4. In view of the above, M.(C).P.No. 124/2007 for status quo stands dismissed. i-—-—— ——.- ! SdA I DiliPRaosahebDeshmukh 1 Judge