IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 1342 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 11, 2010 M/s Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd. …Appellant Versus Chhatar Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Sudershan Goel, Advocate, and Mr. R.N. Singhal, Advocate, Ms. Shweta Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal is directed against order dated 5.10.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby notice to the Managing Director of M/s Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd.-appellant firm has been issued to show cause as to why proceedings of contempt be not initiated against him. 2. It appears that something has transpired between the Court and the appellant which has led to the issuance of notice. At this stage it would be highly undesirable to interfere because it cannot be presumed as to whether the Managing Director of the appellant firm would not succeed to explain satisfac- torily the statements which have been made earlier before learned Single Judge on 17.9.2010. Accordingly, we are not inclined to entertain the appeal leaving the appellant to appear before the learned Single Judge on the adjourned dated. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) October 11, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2