IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVI APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO 6348 OF 2005 Sahebsingh Bhimsing Patil....Petitioner vs Sumanbai Chatursingh Thokre and anr..Respondents Mr Shetye for Prashant D Jadhav for petitioner Mr. P B Shah for respondent nos.l,3,4,6 to l0 CORAM: S.U.KAMDAR J. CORAM: S.U.KAMDAR J. CORAM: S.U.KAMDAR J. Dated 5.l2.2005 Dated 5.l2.2005 Dated 5.l2.2005 P.C: l. There is concurrent findings of fact given by both the trial court and appellate court that the petitioner has no right, title and interest in the property and the decree passed earlier was confirmed upto the Supreme Court. After loosing the litigation for possession of the property now he has claimed that he has supposedly purchased the property from one of the legal heirs of the deceased Prabhatsingh i.e. Chatursingh. Admittedly the deceased had two sons and wife i.e. Chatursingh, Ambersingh and wife Shantabai. The trial court has given a finding that Ambersingh and Shanatabai had not executed any agreement. The appellate court has given a finding that the plaintiff has not come to the court with clean hands and he is not entitled to the property. In that view of the matter interim reliefs are rejected. In view of the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below and as there is no error apparent on the face of record, petition is dismissed.