IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31230 of 2009 1. RAJU NUTT @ RAJU NUT 2. MUTAR NUTT ALIAS MUTAR NAT----PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.9.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. As per the allegation in the First Information Report the petitioners who are real brothers, tried to commit rape, and the complainant raised alarm, as such they fled away from the place of occurrence. However the accused persons, while fleeing away, snatched her golden chain. Counsel for the petitioners submits that false and fabricated case has been instituted against the petitioners. It is also stated that both brothers have been named as accused which show the intention of the complainant for false implication. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on before the petitioners above named is allowed. Let them surrender in the - 2 - Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Mali P.S. case No. 25 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar