THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 21777 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by Vedulla Sudhakar Reddy assailing the inaction of the 1st respondent in entertaining the revision filed by him. 2. The petitioner claims to have purchased the house site admeasuring Ac.0-08 cents comprising Survey No. 20 situated at Bhadrachalam under registered sale deed dated 31-8-1967 from Smt. T.Masthanamma. 3. The petitioner ﬁled O.S.No. 23 of 1973 when his vendor made an attempt to interfere with his possession. The said suit came to be transferred to the ﬁle of the Principal District Munsiﬀ, Kothagudem and renumbered as O.S.No. 456 of 1986. The suit ended in decree. Thereafter, proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner on the ground that his possession in respect of the house site is contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1/1959 as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970. The primary authority found the possession of the petitioner over the site is in contravention of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959 as amended by Regulation 1/ 1970. The petitioner ﬁled an appeal before the appellate authority and the appellate authority conﬁrmed the ﬁnding of the primary authority. Thereupon the petitioner ﬁled revision as provided under Section 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959 as amended by Regulation 1/1970. There being no action on the part of the revisional authority, the petitioner approached this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. When the writ petition came up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare received on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 5. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for social Welfare appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 6. The factual aspect of petitioner ﬁling the revision before the 1st respondent is not in dispute. 7 In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the revision the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. There shall be status quo existing as on this day with regard to the possession of the land in dispute pending the revision or till the disposal of the stay application ﬁled by the petitioner, whichever is earlier. No order as to costs. ______________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 30th September, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 21777 OF 2008 30th September, 2008.