IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1993 of 2008(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ U.VAHEEDA, W/O.K.M.HAMSA, AGED 46 YEARS, PART-TIME JUNIOR URDU TEACHER (PROTECTED) GOVERNMENT U.P.SCHOOL, VELLIKULANGARA, THRISSUR-680 693. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR EAST. 5. THE HEADMASTER, G.U.P.SCHOOL, VELLIKULANGARA, THRISSUR-680 693. G.P. SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.1993 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 16th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was a part time (Junior) Urudu teacher in P.A.U.P. School, Chemboothara, working as such from 15.7.1994. The petitioner was given full time benefit with effect from 15.7.1999. Later on when she was deployed to Government school on protection on staff fixation, the petitioner was paid salary only as part time teacher. Claiming full time benefits in the protected status also, the petitioner has filed Ext.P9 before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P9, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The petitioner would be free to rely on Exts. P6 to P8 or any other w.p.c.1993/08 2 orders which, according to the petitioner, would support her case and the 1st respondent shall consider the applicability of the same also to the petitioner's case. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge