IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1085 of 2011(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 14/12/2010 IN WP(C) NO. 36998/2010 ............... PETITIONERS / PETITIONERS : --------------------------------------------- 1. P.C.SHIBU, AGED 43, S/O. CHIDAMBHARAN, MACHINE OPERATOR, MATSYAFED NET FACTORY, DR.SALIM ALI ROAD, KOCHI-682 018, RESIDING AT PEEDIKAKKAPARAMBIL, EDAKOCHI-682 006. 2. JOSEPH PAYAS T.G., AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. LATE JOHN JOSEPH, MACHINE OPERATOR, MATSYAFED NET FACTORY, DR.SALIM ALI ROAD, KOCHI-682 018, RESIDING AT THATTASSERY HOUSE, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM-682 040. 3. P.M.ASHRAF, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMED, MACHINE OPERATOR, MATSYAFED NET FACTORY, DR.SALIM ALI ROAD, KOCHI-682 018, RESIDING AT POTTAPARAMBU, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-682 028. 4. JOB YESUDAS V.M., AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.LATE V.I.MATHEW, MACHINE OPERATOR, MATSYAFED NET FACTORY, DR.SALIM ALI ROAD, KOCHI-682 018, RESIDING AT VELLANATTU HOUSE, KUMBALANGI P.O., PIN-682 007. BY ADV. SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT : ---------------------- SOMARAJAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, MATSYAFED, KAMALESWARAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC, MATSYAFED THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- Con.Case(C).No. 1085 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE'S ANNEXURE I : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 14.12.2010 IN WPC NO.36998/2010. ANNEXURE II: TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DATED 1.3.2011 IN WPC NO.6358/11. ANNEXURE III: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 28.6.2011 SENT BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE IV: TRUE COPY OF POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD. ANNEXURE V: TRUE COPY OF LAWYER NOTICE DATED 7.9.2011. ANNEXURE VI: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 28.9.2011 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER. ANNEXURE VII: TRUE COPY OF POSTAL COVER OF NOTICE DATED 28.9.2011. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE'S : ANNEXURE R1( a) : COPY OF THE ORDER NO. MFED/E4/76/09 DATED 29-10-2011. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn C.K. ABDUL REHIM,J. ------------------------------------------------- Con. Case (c) No.1085 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T This contempt of court case is filed alleging non- compliance of the directions contained in Annexure-I judgment. Learned counsel, who entered appearance on behalf of respondent, had produced Annexure-R1 (a), which is the proceedings issued by the respondent in compliance with the directions contained in the judgment. 2. Under the above mentioned circumstances, I am of the view that proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act is not sustainable. 3. However, the petitioners will be at liberty to challenge the decision taken, if they are aggrieved, in appropriate proceedings. Therefore the contempt of court case is hereby closed. Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. AMG True copy P.A to Judge