1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4004 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Dani for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 14TH JUNE 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The impugned order is an interlocutory order. Besides, it does not affect the rights of the petitioners. In the operative part of the order, the Bench of the Small Causes Court hearing the revision has clearly mentioned that permission to deposit the amount has been granted to the respondents at their own risk. In this view, the rights of the petitioners are not at 2 all affected. The writ petition is rejected summarily. 3. The petitioners pray for expediting the hearing of the suit before the Trial Court. I see no reason to interfere with the calendar of the Trial Court. The request is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)