HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR CRP No. 1897 of 2007 O R D E R: This is the plaintiff’s revision seeking impleadment of proposed respondent as defendant No.3, who is said to be the sister of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The said application was dismissed by the trial Court. Hence this revision. 2. Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner. It cannot be contraverted that in any suit for Specific Performance, only parties to the Agreement can be impleaded and the proposed party in the suit being admittedly not a party to the agreement, her impleadment in the present suit for specific performance is clearly unjustified. The trial court is, justified and right in not permitting the impleadment as prayed for. I see no reasons warranting interference of this Court, hence the revision petition is meritless and is liable to be dismissed. 3 Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ 03-09-2010 Mjl/*