o , 'r . { o INTHEBUGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BBLASPUR W.P.rS)No. ^f^<~ of 2011 PETmONER: Nawdha Ram Kashyap^ son of Shri Shyam Lal Kashyap, aged about 52 years, resident of Village —Kaitha, District- Janjgir - Champa, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: >^"^ ...^ ^- ^3^- ^-'^.,......-- ^6^...--""' ^'"" State of C.G. Through : the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). District Education ofificer, Janjgir, District, Janjgir -Champa. (C.G.) y ^3. Block Education officer, Jaijaipur, District; Janjgir -Champa. (C.G.) 4. Block Quardinator, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission^ Jaijaipur^ District, Janjgir -Champa. (C.G.) 5. Collector; District; Janjgir -Champa. (C.G.) WRTT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI, PROHIBmON AND FOR OTHER SUTTABLE WRTT QR WRTTS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ^l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (8) No. 7365 of2011 Nawdha Ram Kashyap. RE8PONDENTS VERSUS State ofC.G. & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AssihoM^J, Present: Shri Yogeshwar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Shri Aron Sao, Goveniment Advocate forfhe State/respondents ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Shri Sharma, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/l\ the petitioner, working as Upper Division Teacher at Govemment Middle School, Tilai, Akaltara, has been transferred to Govemment Middle School, Katha, Jaijaipur, on adtnimstrative grounds. Shri Sharma farther submits that there is no post available at the transferred place and thus, it would not be possible for the petitioner to comply with tfae aforesaid order. 2. Shri Sao, leamed Govemment Advocate appearing for the State/ respondents submits that ifthere is no vacant post ofUpper Division Teacher available at the transferred place^ appropriate order shall be passed in respect ofthe petitioner within a period of 10 days. 3. In view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsel for the petitionen nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amlt