IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 1695 of 2006 Date of decision : 21.9.2006. Uday Singh. .........Petitioner. Versus State of Haryanna & Ors. ...........Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL ) The present revision petition has been filed against the order passed by the learned trial Court rejecting the objection petition filed by the petitioner under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and making the award rule of the Court. The appeal filed by the petitioner against the said order was dismissed by the Additional District Judge,Sirsa. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the impugned order as well as the award is liable to be set aside as the arbitrator has misconducted himself in not considering the documents placed on record. I have considered the argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner and do not find any force in the same as in case of non- speaking award it is not open to the Court to divulge into the mind of arbitrator and come to conclusion as to whether the documents have been considered or not. Nor it is open to the Court to find fault with the process C.R.No. 1695 of 2006 -2- of adjudication by the arbitrator. There is no merit in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. September 21,2006 ( VINOD K. SHARMA ) 'sp' JUDGE