1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4657 OF 1998. Shivaji S/o Deoji Rathod ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.P.G.Rodge, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.V.D.Rakh, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 02.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per B.R.Gavai,J.) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for payment of salary. It is the contention of the petitioner that he was working since 1993-99, however, his salary was not paid 2 to him. Mr.Rodge, learned counsel submits that he has acquired qualification in 1996 and thereafter the Management has submitted a proposal to the Respondent No.4 for payment of salary. 2. In view of the specific statement made by the petitioner that he was qualified and the proposal is already sent to the Respondent No.4, we direct the Respondent NO.4 to consider the proposal and take appropriate decision within a period of three (3) months from today. 3. Rule made absolute in above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp4657.98