KBP 1 CA-206-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.206 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL [STAMP] NO.30611 OF 2009 [Rahima Vs. Shaista] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.Vijay Killedar i/b.Mr.Nitin Jamdar, for applicant. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr.Vijay Killedar, learned counsel for the applicant. On the motion made by learned counsel for the applicant, name of respondent no.6 is allowed to be deleted from the memorandum of Second Appeal at the risk of the applicant­appellant. This is an application for condonation of delay of 36 days in filing Second Appeal. Office remark shows that respondent nos.1 to 5 are represented by advocate and respondent nos.7 to 14 are duly served. No reply is filed opposing the application. KBP 2 CA-206-10.sxw Hence, for the reasons set out in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) with no order as to costs. [R.G.KETKAR, J.]