1 1 caf.636.11 anr ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 636 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 850 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Pawan S. Patil for the Applicants / Interveners. Mr. Sandesh Patil for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22 nd June, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants. 2 According to the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants, they are claiming to be the tenants of the Appellants in the first appeal. The Applicants did not apply to the trial Court for intervention. Moreover, if the Applicants have any cause of action against any party to the Appeal, it is for them to adopt appropriate proceedings in that behalf. It is not the case of the Applicants that they had acquired any right title or interest in the property after the impugned decree was passed. Hence, there is no merit in the application and subject to what is observed above, the same is rejected. [ A.S.OKA, J ] 2 1 caf.636.11 anr ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2495 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 850 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms. S.P.Parkar i/b M/s. M.P.Rege and Company for the Applicants. Mr. Sandesh Patil for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22 nd June, 2011. P.C. This application was adjourned from time to time for settlement. However, settlement could not have arrived at. Hence, the application shall be fixed for hearing on 12 th July, 2011. [ A.S.OKA, J ]