FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6776 OF 2010 “Vaibhav s/o. Shrikant Govardhan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. P.B. Rakhunde, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. V.A. Shinde, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. S.V. Munde, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 10TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] The petitioner has impugned the communication/letter dated 17/8/2009 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed. By this communication, the Zilla Parishad has rejected the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment in place of his deceased sister - Smt. Priti Shrikantrao Goverdhan, who died on 20th June, 2008. The deceased sister of the petitioner was working as Class IV employee in a school run by respondent No.2 – Zilla parishad. After her death, the petitioner and his parents applied for getting certificate as legal heirs of the deceased. The said certificate was granted on 23.3.2009. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6776 OF 2010 “Vaibhav s/o. Shrikant Govardhan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 The petitioner applied for his appointment on compassionate ground on 5/8/2009, i.e. 1 year after the death of his sister. The application has been rejected solely on the ground that the application for compassionate appointment was filed beyond the period of one year, as contemplated by Govt. Resolution dated 22/8/2005. 3] We have perused the Govt. Resolution dated 22/8/2005, which provides that application for appointment on compassionate ground is required to be made by heir of the deceased employee, within a period of one year from the date of death of the employee. Since the petitioner filed the application for compassionate appointment after the period of one year, in our opinion, the concerned authority has rightly rejected the same. 4] We find no substance in the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6776 OF 2010 “Vaibhav s/o. Shrikant Govardhan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3