THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B CHANDRA KUMAR A.S. NO. 54 of 2000 DT. 26.7.2011 Between: Chukka Ranga Reddy … Petitioner And Smt Chukka Ratnavathi … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt (P) Anjana Devi Counsel for respondent: Sri M Lakshman Sarma The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B CHANDRA KUMAR A.S. NO. 54 of 2000 JUDGMENT : (Per Sri Justice V Eswaraiah) The husband is defendant-appellant herein, who filed the present appeal questioning the judgment and decree dated 9.11.1999 in O.S. No. 63 of 1998 by the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam decreeing the suit as prayed for enhancing the maintenance from Rs.400/- as awarded in M.C. No. 118 of 1989 on the file of Special Mobile Court, Visakhapatnam dated 15.2.1990 to that of Rs.1,000/- and creating a charge over the plaint schedule property. The wife plaintiff/respondent herein filed a case under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code in M.C. No. 118 of 1989 on the file of the Special Mobile Court, Visakhapatnam seeking maintenance and the learned Magistrate by order dated 15.2.1990 granted a monthly maintenance of Rs.400/- to wife and Rs.150/- each to the daughters. It is alleged that the even the said maintenance granted by the Court below was not paid regularly. The wife-respondent herein, unable to maintain herself, she being a legally wedded wife of the appellant, filed the suit in O.S.No. 63 of 1998 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, for enhancement of maintenance to Rs.1,000/- and to create charge over the suit schedule property. In support of her claim for enhancement of maintenance, in the said suit the wife-respondent contended that the husband-appellant took voluntary retirement from the Army in the year 1977 and working as a Driver in All India Radio, Visakhapatnam on a salary of Rs.6000/- per month, that he gets a monthly pension of Rs.2,000/- in respect of his previous job in Army and that he has got a house property at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam with four shops and a residential accommodation fetching rents of more than Rs.2000/- per month. Thus, it is contended that the husband-appellant has got a monthly income of Rs.10,000/- and the claim of the wife for enhancement of maintenance to Rs.1000/- is justified. The husband-appellant filed a written statement in the suit denying the allegations made against him as regards his income, the rents and the allegation that he neglected his wife. He further contended that the wife is working as a nurse in Children Hospital at Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam on a monthly salary of Rs.4000/- and that his daughter Ms.Tulasi Sudha is working as Typist in M/s. New Weight Tech.Pvt.Limited, Visakhapatnam on a monthly salary of Rs.3000/- and they have got sufficient means to maintain themselves. Heard the learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent and perused the material available on record. The suit was filed claiming enhancement of maintenance to Rs.1000/- by the wife alone. In the suit, the wife examined herself as P.W.1 and marked documents in Ex.A1 to A5. Ex.A.1 is copy of the order in MC No. 118 of 1989 on the file of the Special Mobile Court, Visakhapatnam granting maintenance of Rs.400/- to the wife and Rs.150/- each to the daughters. Ex.A.2 is copy of registered partition deed dated 19.3.1984. Ex.A.3 is copy of registered partition deed dated 2.11.1933. Ex.A.4 is copy of certificate of service of defendant-husband. Ex.A5 is pay slip of defendant-husband for the month of September, 1999. In her evidence, she stated that her husband was retired from the Army and presently working as Driver in All India Radio on a monthly salary of Rs.8000/- and got one building of four portions at Dondaparthi. She stated that she discontinued the work in the private hospital and it is incorrect to say that she is earning. In the cross examination, nothing was elicited from her. The defendant examined himself as D.W.1 and stated that his daughter has become major, got married and living separately and wife was already awarded a maintenance of Rs.400/- per month in M.C. 118 of 1989 and that he is working as a Driver in All India Radio on a monthly salary of Rs.5000/- alone. It is stated that the wife is working as a Nurse in a Children Hospital on a monthly salary of Rs.2000/-. He also stated that he got some illegal contact with some other lady viz., Sravani as the wife-respondent herein left his company and that he begot two sons through said Sravani and that the wife-respondent herein is in a position to maintain herself. In the cross examination he denied the suggestion that he is getting a monthly salary of Rs.8000/- and rents of Rs.2500/-, however, no material is produced to establish the same. He admitted that Ex.A.5 i.e., pay slip is true and correct. In view of the above, the averments made by the wife-respondent herein are amply established. In fact, the enhancement of maintenance claimed by her is only from Rs.400/- to Rs.1000/-, which is just and reasonable. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court below has rightly decreed the suit enhancing the maintenance to Rs.1000/- and creating charge over the suit property. We do not see any reason legal or otherwise warranting interference of this Court. The appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. ______________ V ESWARAIAH,J __________________ B CHANDRA KUMAR,J DATE: 26.7.11 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B CHANDRA KUMAR A.S. NO. 54 of 2000 Date:26.7.2011