1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4262 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Kishor S Patil, for the petitioners. Ms A.R.Saundankar, for respondent no.1. Mr S.D.Kadam, for respondent no.2. Mrs Manisha Shelkar, i/b J Shekhar & Co for respondent no.3. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 13/08/2009 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition is directed against the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below in the proceedings arising from the application filed by the petitioners raising a preliminary objection of maintainability of the dispute. I have perused the order passed by the courts below. It appears from the order dated 13.12.2007 passed by the Co-operative Court, Nashik that the issue T 2 of jurisdiction has been kept open to be considered with the rest of the issues in the dispute. That order has been confirmed by the Co-operative Appellate Court vide judgment and order dated 17.3.2009 in A. O. No.144 of 2008. Having considered the nature of controversy involved in the petition and the order of the Co-operative Court, by which the issue of jurisdiction is kept open, I see no reason to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. All contentions on the point of jurisdiction and maintainability of the dispute are kept open. The Co-operative Court shall dispose of the dispute expeditiously. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)