IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41791 of 2009 1. KHAKHANU RAI, S/o Late Raghubansh Rai. 2. Akhilesh Rai. 3. Laljit Rai. Both Sons of Khakhanu Rai. 4. Dhanwanti Devi @ Smt. Dhanwanti Devi, W/o- Khakhanu Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 328 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner Nos. 1 and 4 are maternal uncle and aunt of the deceased whereas petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are the brother of petitioner No. 1 and have been implicated merely on suspicion on account of earlier land dispute, let the above named petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are in custody since 27.07.2009 and petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are in custody since 19.08.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with - 2 - Sonpur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)