w] C /g«¢g1////4 (D IN;?HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P. No.....2....l..$..( ....../2oo4 Rambharosi Lal Aged about 61 years S/O Late Shri Tikaram R/O Railway 595/2 Near Budhwari Bazar- PETITIONER R.P.F; Line, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ‘Union of India Through the Manager South » Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, Calcutta—43 General General Manager South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur The Director General Railway Protection Force, Railway Board Rail Bhawan, New Delhi The Chief Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force, s.E.r Rafilway, Garden§Reach, Calcutta—43 < Senior’ Divisional Personnel Officer, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.) § ‘ WW,WWW S.B:’ HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITINKER DIWAKER 14-G7-2009: , Shri Varun Sharma Ad ocate on behalf of Shri Jitendra Pall,5¢bUumbUl lUl LIIC pellLlUHEl 9 . FShrl P S Koshy, counsel or the respondents. segxnp‘v, Counsel for the resoond nts submits that after filing of the Detltton the entlre amount has een oald to the oetrtloner Counsel for the Detitlo er does not dlsnute the same except the fact that accordmg t htm petttloner Is also entitled for interest on the delayed paymen . Counsel for the respond nts submits that tet the petitioner make a representation'claimin the interest and the same would be considered in accordance wi h law. With the above observati n; the petitioner s disposed of. i Sd/- i Prltinker Diwaker yea Judge ‘y \ KAW’Nb 7—19 WW" H1200? ‘mm(W> mam ammm mmm WW WW $aifanm