mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3682 OF 1994 Smt.Jamanabai Kurmayya Mamdyal Petitioner versus Allabaksh Hasansaheb Maniyar and another Respondents Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Amol Mhatre i/by P.K.Dhakephalkar for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st April 2010 PC :- 1. When the petition is called out for final hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the instructions received by him from the advocate appearing for the petitioner in the Trial Court, it appears that possession of the suit premises has been taken over by the first respondent- landlord. He states that thereafter he has not received any instructions from the petitioner to prosecute the petition. In view of this statement, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (A.S.OKA, J.)