IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No.18892 OF 2007 Between: Thatineni Ravi Kumar. … Petitioner AND State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad and two others. …Respondents This Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner herein was with regard to the inaction of the respondents in removing the encroachment made on the public road in R.S.No.61/4, Prasadampadu village in spite of the representation dated 28-08-2007 made by the villagers. 2. Heard Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri G.Elisha, learned Standing Counsel for Prasadampadu Gram Panchayat. 3. The Sarpanch of Prasadampadu Gram Panchayat in his counter stated that a wall had been illegally constructed encroaching upon the road causing inconvenience to the public and that the Gram Panchayat, under its resolution No.108 dated 28-08-2007, resolved to remove the same. This counter was filed in October, 2007 and concluded by stating that appropriate steps were being taken for removal of the encroachment as per law. The written instructions dated 19-11-2007 issued by the District Panchayat Officer, Krishna District to the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj thereafter, state to the effect that as per the above resolution, the illegal wall constructed by the encroacher had been removed. 4. In view of the aforestated developments, no further cause survives for adjudication in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 10th February, 2011. AMD/KVS