bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 394 OF 2008 FROM ORDER NO. 394 OF 2008 FROM ORDER NO. 394 OF 2008 Mrs.Sanjivani Yogesh Dikshit ... Appellant v/s Mrs.Alka Meghraj Surana & anr. ... Respondents Mr.R.S.Apte with Mr.A.A.Garge for the appellant. Mr.M.M.Sathaye for respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 25TH JULY, 2008 25TH JULY, 2008 25TH JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The Trial Court has denied the interim relief to the appellant in a suit for specific performance of agreement dated 26.7.2006. According to the appellant, the respondents have executed the aforesaid agreement in respect of the suit property at the rate of Rs.45,000/- per acre. Earnest amount of Rs.21,000/- has been paid as reflected from the receipt. However, this document is not stamped nor does it indicate that it is genuine. Apart from this, the respondents have denied their signatures on the specimen document. The written statement which has been annexed to the affidavit indicates that prima facie the signatures of both the respondents do not match with the ones appended to the 2 "agreement". 2. In the circumstances, the Trial Court has rightly refused the interim injunction. 3. Appeal from order dismissed. 4. At the request of Mr.Apte, the injunction granted earlier to continue for a period of eight weeks.