jpc wp8708-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH Court OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8708 OF 2011 Brahma Shakti Singh @ Munna Sarkar ... Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and others ... Respondents Ms. Taniya Dayal i/by M/s J. Shekhar & Co. for the petitioner CORAM: R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : 16th November, 2011 P.C. : 1. The above Petition takes exception to order dated 10th August, 2011 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay by which order, Chamber Summons No. 762 of 2010 filed by the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 herein in L.C. Suit No. 6328 of 2000 for impleading them as party to the said Suit came to be allowed. 2. The said Chamber summons was allowed on the ground that the Respondent No. 2 to 5 herein are the heirs of the original owner one Ramnath Grover. The Suit filed by the Petitioner herein who is the original plaintiff in respect of the notice issued under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988. In the context of the said challenge, the learned trial Court was of the view that the original jpc wp8708-11.sxw 2 owner i.e. heirs of the original owners are necessary party to the Suit. It is sought to be contended on behalf of the Petitioner that the said original owner had sold the rooms in question i.e. rooms in the Chawl to the occupants of the respective rooms. In my view, the said fact would not take away the fact that owners continued to be the owners of the property, though may be the rooms in question have been sold. In that view of the matter, the reasons given by the learned trial Court for impleadment of the respondents i.e. heirs of the original owner in the said Suit cannot be faulted with. No case for interference is made out. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (R. M. SAVANT, J.)