IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 590 OF 2010 MR. ANTHONY BARBOSSA ... Petitioner Versus SMT. SHANTI FERNANDES AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th January, 2011 P.C. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 28th April, 2010 passed by the Additional Director of Panchayat, Margao in Panchayat Appeal No.93/2009 allowing the appeal filed by respondent no.1 filed under Section 66(7) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. 2. During the pendency of this petition, the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 has been amended and Section 201(B) has been brought into force with effect from 15th October, 2010 which provides revision against the order passed by the Additional Director of Panchayat. 3. In view of the above position, Mr. Pangam, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file revision application before the appropriate District Court to challenge the impugned judgment and order. 4. Mr. Pangam states that the petitioner will file revision application within a period of three weeks from today and since revision application has to be filed within 30 days as per subsection 2 of Section 201(B) of the Act, delay in filing revision application be condoned. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned judgment and order by filing revision application before the appropriate District Court within a period of three weeks from today. In case the revision application is filed within three weeks from today, the District Court shall condone the delay in filing the revision application and deal with the revision application in accordance with law. Writ Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA