IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14130 of 2009 BUNELA YADAV @ BUNDELA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.6.2009 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under section 364A of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. He further submits that one Anil Singh was put on trial and the victim person namely Bhola Prasad who is said to have named six persons including Anil Singh, in his statement under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. did not affirm the same in course of his deposition as would be evident from Annexure-3. The victim person has stated that he did not identify any of the accused persons and on that basis accused Anil Singh was acquitted. The petitioner has surrendered on 19.8.2008 and since then he is languishing in jail. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in jail custody. (S.P.Singh,J)