IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 8 of 2005 SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH V/S MAHARISHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY & ORS. Mr. SANJEET PUROHIT, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 13.1.2005 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DINESH MAHESHWARI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, perused the impugned order. The learned Single Judge has affirmed the order Annex.8. Learned counsel has pointedly put the only submissions that even if the appellant absented from the classes, at best, his appearing in the examination can be cancelled but his admission could not be cancelled, and in any case re-admission could not be refused. In Annex.8, a specific ground has been given by the authorities that on account of such long absence, he is ineligible for re-admission. Learned counsel was specifically put a question as to how this part of the order is bad and how he has challenged in the writ petition or in the appeal. Learned counsel expressed his inability to satisfy the quarry. We thus do not find any force in the appeal, and the same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( DINESH MAHESHWARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /mohan/