IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.452 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Dharamveer S/o Jaipal R/o Village Toda, Kalyanpur, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: April 27, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.11/2009 Under Sections 394, 307/34, 411 and 120-B of IPC P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is neither named in the First Information Report nor the recovery has been made from his possession. It is further argued that the co-accused Ishrar @ Chotu has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 27.10.2009 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. The applicant is in jail since January 2009 and learned Additional Government Advocate could not produce any criminal history of the applicant before me. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Dharamveer be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Haridwar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 27.04.2010 RG