IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22179 of 2005 Between: 1 The Convention of Baptist Church of Northen Circars (CBCNC) Rep. by its President, Gannavaram, Krishna District, 2 The Trust Association of the Convention of Baptist Churches of Northern Churches, aged about 60 yrs, Gannavaram, Krishna District, ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The DIrector of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, 2 The District Educational Officer, Srikakulam District, 3 The DIstrict Educational Officer, Vizianagaram District, 4 The DIstrict Educational Officer, Visakhapatnam District, 5 The DIstrict Educational Officer, East Godavari District, 6 The DIstrict Educational Officer, West Godavari District, 7 The DIstrict Educational Officer, Krishna District, 8 The DIstrict Educational Officer, Guntur District, 9 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Kakinada and Guntur, 10 S.M. Kantha Raju, President (CBCNC) C/o. Sri Danial Lock Road, Kankipadu, Krishna District, 11 D. Yacob, Convener, (CBCNC) C/o. Smt. Venkata Ramamma, 1st Street, Noble College, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Rc.No. 18/B1-2/2002 dt. 16-9-2005 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to law and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MRS.Y.ANUPAMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 9: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.11: Mr.M.CHANDRASEKHARA RAO The Court made the following : O R D E R : When this writ petition came up for hearing on 11.06.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even on this day also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:25th June, 2009. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}