‘ ’é “@L www mw IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAspUR (c.G.) w. P. (S) No. $93 o£ 201 1 / PETITIONER : Shashikant Shanna, S/o Shri Brij Bhushan Sharma, aged about 27 years, R/o Mahamaya Chowk, Pandaria, District— Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS / RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Health Bhawan, 3/. Chief Medical 85 Health omcer, Kabirdham, District—Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A/v 0%“, /7 RaiPur (C.G.) 2. Director, Health Family Welfare Services 82; Department, Raipur (C.G.) 7y 1 I HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 893 of201‘l VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETI'I‘ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. .. Present: Shri Prateek Shanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL ,, (Passed on 14 day of February, 2011) . By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for‘ quashment of the advettisement dated 05.09.2010 (Annexure P/l) to the extent it relates to the post of Lab Technician, and has also prayed for setting aside the impugwd select list dated 25.01.2011 (Annexure P/2). . Though, the petitioner has challenged and sought quashment of the select list, yet, none of the selected candidates have been arrayed as party-respondents in this writ petition. . In K.H.Siraj v. High Court ofKerala & Others‘ the Supreme Court has laid down the law that when a select list is challenged, all the selected candidates should be joined as a necessaiy patty in the petition. . In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable in absence of the selected candidates having been joined as necessary party. However, ifthe petitioner so desires, he may tile a hesh petition aiterjoining the selected candidates as party respondent. PETITIONER : Shashikant Shanna. M...”— l (2006) 6 scc 395 Sdl— Prashant K‘m‘ar Judge Mishfa