IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No: 12797 of 2001 Between: Adi Ramana S/o V.Amarnath Reddy 5-3-760 & 761. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P., Rep by its Dist Collector, Hyd. 2 The Dy.Director, Survey & Land Records, Hyd. 3 The Mandal Revenue officer, Nampally Mandal, Hyd. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one inthe nature of writ of mandamus declaring the procd bearing memo Nos. L.Dis F2/TS/154/2001 & L.Dis F2/TS/239/2001 dt 10-4-2001 & 21-5- 2001 respectively issued by the R2 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Sy. and Boundaries Act, without any authority of law and besides being violative of right to property guarantedd under Art 300A of the Constitution of India and fundemental right guaranted under Art 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the R2 to issue TSLR certiﬁcate by declaring the wrong entires and by correcting the same in terms of the ﬁnal decree dt 20- 11-1970 Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.ANANDAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 05-11-2008 the writ petition was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also neither the counsel for petitioner is present nor there is any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. 6th November 2008 CVRK