IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5514 of 2010 DR.KAILASH SINHA S/O LATE BIHARI SINHA, R/O "SINHA SADAN" BARBIGHA, P.S.BARBIGHA, DISTT- SHEIKHPURA ---Petitioner Versus 1. TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR, T.M.B.U., BHAGALPUR, BIHAR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR. 3. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR, BIHAR. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, S.K.R. COLLEGE, BARBIGHA, SHEIKHPURA. 5. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 6. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPTT. (HIGHER EDUCATION) GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA. 7. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 31.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University. It has been submitted that the petitioner superannuated from the post of University Professor and Head of the Department, Chemistry, S.K.R. College, Barbigha on 31st of March, 2000. Upon his superannuation, retiral dues were fixed. However, on account of revision, the revised pensionary benefits have not been settled as yet as also the remaining unpaid salary, which has been calculated by the concerned College and sent to the University. The aforesaid claims have remained to be settled and paid. Mr Keshari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be thoroughly verified with the record and then only the claim can be settled. 2 In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (respondent no.2). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be settled at the earliest and upon consideration, the admitted dues could also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)