Writ Petition No. 1254 (SS) of 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. (Amendment Application No. 5382 of 2005) Heard Sri S.S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for respondents no. 1, 2, 4 and 5 and Sri B.D. Kandpal, for respondent no. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioners in the District Rural Development Agency or in other Departments on the basis of the combined competitive examination 2002 conducted by the Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal. The submission of the petitioners is that petitioners and some other persons have been selected on the post of Junior Engineer by the Commission. Other persons have already been given appointment but appointment letters have not been issued to the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed by the respondents by giving them appointment in the Uttaranchal Pey Jal Department. Now, by means of the present application, petitioners want to amend the prayer clause of the writ petition and challenge the condition 12 of the appointment letter. Amendment application is rejected. However, if the petitioners want to challenge the condition no. 12 of the appointment they may file fresh writ petition. so far as the present writ petition is concerned since the relief sought by the petitioners has already been granted to them the writ petition has become inftructuous. Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- 05.08.2005 S.K.S