1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Appeal against Order No.89 of 2010 (Tanesh s/o Nathu Gahrule v. Smt. Sumati w/o Kisan Sirsikar and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.K. Pardhy, Advocate for Appellant. Smt. K.S. Karmarkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 20 th April, 2011 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 19-1-2010 passed by the learned Ad hoc District Judge-5, Nagpur, in Civil Appeal No.593 of 2008 filed by the respondent No.1, thereby setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court and remanding the matter back to the Trial Court for fresh hearing. The Appellate Court has directed the respondent No.1/plaintiff to implead all necessary parties to the suit and further directed the Trial Court to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. Shri Pardhy, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, is unable to point out any substantial question of law arising out the direction given by the Appellate Court to implead 2 all necessary parties to the suit. In view of this, no fault can be found with the judgment and order passed by the Appellate Court, thereby remanding the matter to the Trial Court for fresh hearing. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Judge pdl