.^}^:-^ ,.r^sv^. ^^S^y€f.^" ^'-01;..^-""" ^- 7.*»'B< .....°-^ ^•-"" •f IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No38 ! O /2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS A° -p >•" v : Ashok Kumar Joshi, S/o. Shri Sukalha Joshi, aged 21 years, R/o. Baghraitola, Tah-Pandaria Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Kabirdham, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive officer (Prescribed offlcer) Janpad Panchayat, Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). 4. Gram Panchayat Baghraitola, through its Sarpanch, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). 5. Smt. Indira Devi, Sarpanch Gram Panchyat Baghraitola Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 6. Nathuram Joshi S/o Sukalha Joshi aged about 27 years R/o Village - Baghraitola, Tah. Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). ^\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARY, PROHIBITION AND ANY OTHER :WRIT /ORDER/DIRECTION^-^^7 •~"^.^-^ry.."r-s-/l?r'- - ^A ":' l^l^i,^' ^"y"^ '.-.-.K •^-s XI.HC-78 <t 1*101 a»*n^ vd-cq T^|I«IO<4,tP"<?l\1''l<?, Rtrtltl^ -=_ ^•<3 ^•^§^L.__c ^^.........................^......^ STT^T^RW ('3^36^) W=f200 3ii^T^rRiTii<iy WHOT^^Tw^icp ^ Sarma T ^.?'> ^y ^^ ^' y^ v ^^ ?;^rrwr^Tf^T OT^I^T { ^SSJ09^20P5 Mr. Praveen Das, learned ^ Mr. Pankaj Shrivastaval, le| State of Chhattisgarh. Learnecl counsel for th^ petitioner submits that respondent No.4 has not appoint^d the petitioner to the post of Panchayat Karmi in spite ofth^ fact that Gram Panchayat resoived to appoint e petitioner] petitioner has filed airepresentati| of the petitioner on 19.07.2005 ( received by the Chief Executive <h(^j0^T1 HR^f^"fe^Q'xRi^ix ^arf^r^ST .ounsel for the petitjoner. girned Panel Lawyer for the i as Panchayat Karmi. The ^n against non-appointment [Annexure P-5), which was |)fficer, Janpad Panchayat/ respondent No.3. Learned coun|>el for the petitioner prays for a direction to the responden|ts 2 & 3 to consider and decide the representation f]led by the petitiorter, expeditiousty. Accordingly, respondents consider and decide the repre^ 2 & 3 are directed to entation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2005 (Annexure P-^) expeditiously, preferably within a period offour weeks, froitn the date ofreceipt ofthis order. i of. In view of thejfbregoing, tl| Consequently, all pendin^ disposed of. e petition stands disposed applications aiso stand Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge