1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2367 of 2011 Shanthi Vedhnayagam ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul. in Crime No.41 of 2008. ...Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul to complete the trial in C.C.No.39 of 2009 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s. M.Ajmal Khan For Respondent : Mrs.S.Devasena Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul to complete the trial in C.C.No.39 of 2009. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an order of this Court has been made in Crl.O.P. (MD).No.5346 of 2010 to expedite the trial and the earlier order given, however, the accused 2 and 5 were absconded in order to delay the trial proceedings and the direction given by this Court was not complied with and therefore, the petitioner has come forward with this present petition for another direction for an expeditious disposal and to fix the time frame for the same. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit in her argument that the case was taken for trial and in the mean while, A2 and A5 were absconded and a Non-Bailable Warrant has been issued and the case has been now splitted against A2 and A5 and the case against the remaining accused has been taken up and the respondent police is ready to proceed with the case and suitable time limit may be fixed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Considering the submissions made on either side, this Court could see that the case has been splitted owing to the direction issued for expeditious disposal and still it is pending. Considering the pendency of the case despite direction has been given, this Court again directing the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul to complete the trial in C.C.No.39 of 2009 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and simultaneously, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul is also directed to execute the Non- Bailable Warrant issued against A2 and A5 and to complete the trial within the time as aforesaid. With the aforesaid direction, the petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul 2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +One Cc to M/s.M.Ajmalkhan, Advocate, SR.No.10032 akv rl/5c – 8.3.2011 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2367 of 2011 24.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/