IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. i~Z6Q / 2005 PETITIONER li''.-" ^:....--'r< ^->N RESPONDENTS ^^.^^y^ Sr ''yl 'i- h' ^.^ ^9r/ s:'.''s'(r^ yi^y' v'^-^. Teejrani Kesharwani <sr ;ed about 70 years ^ S/o. Late Shri Awadhrara (S .•fV'' • Kesharwani C^-W^ ^et!r^. ••/ 'y '-Retired Upper Division Teacher R/o. Nawagarh, Tahsil - Nawagarh District Janjgir Cham.pa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary School Education Departraent Mantralay Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Joint Director Treasur-e, Account and Pension Division Bilaspur Bilaspur (C.G.) District Education Officer Janjgir Distt. Janjgir-Chainpa (C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh /•'' Through, the Secretary School Education Department Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.> WRIT PETITIQN UZA, 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -3. 4, XI-HC-22 SfI^T^ R-fi«h3ii^r StltliqiBf^d' 'SSt •<11<<ICI<1, ®Tfl«'|lS,fcjl'ilti^ 3ii^l ^iach *ii*iMra»*iic(> 200^ R<>od 311^1 ^kllWdfltT Mr. Ashok Swdr-nakar, Mr. Sudhir Agrawal, to 3. Heard both The counsel The petitioner has prei 227 of the Constitution of Ir part of the respondents in n orowotion and evsn atter' dounsei for the DeTJrjoner'. sit'sl Lawysr for the State/respondents No.l Paihsl ord4r IT*Ll .^ .^^a^rt^t ^h^ l^Lh^l. ^—_ J-^-L^ 1 H£ CdSS; OT THS D&TiTI o.3 Assistont Teaeher jn t.h® Podi. After fiiing a civil sui- AdtT.inisTrative Tr'ibunol, thel Upper bivision Tsacher in t!^ 50-2640/- vide order 25-1-19fl Learned counsei for i| may be alio'A'sd to make a rep| respondenT No.3 be directed Panel Lawyer for the State c-j Hcvlng heard reaard to the limited real petitions", ths pa+itione," is aj !ti]<iffl<fl-i iiticiT^'tei^t'<Ri(<;i<. ^isri^riTsn^T ferred this writ oetition under Article 226/ Ir(dia, be-ing aagrieved by tne inaction o.n the !t qrantina hirn jncrements even after the datsd 28-4-1998 Dassed by the Tribunai. itner is that he was cpDointed on 4-7-1959 l&eoartment of Edueation at Sovt. Sehooi. ond Qr'iginai appiication before the Stats peTitjoner' wcs pi'omoted to the post of \a sw sccie of fts.1400-40-1440-50-2340- ?3, but no increments were granted to him. 'tS Dstitioner submits thst ths Dstltioner l^sentation to r^spondent No.3, and i" turn, \to pass appfopriaTe order. To which iearned Chhattigqcrh has no obiection. lebrned counsei for the D'ifties ond hwinci best maae by teorned counse! for the lowsd to malts c dstailed rsorssentation to X3-HC-22 3Ti^T?iT fiRwsn^r stiiitKlIga aitIRi 3ST ri|l<<|c<<<, ©Tfly'is,jsldiyy 3ll^l'4s|ch *ll*lCTl Shwiti"" ' JV^ 200 5~~ sn^rsRnwflfer ^ CJGVS respondent No.3 wi-rhin tsn wd in rwn, respondenT No.3 Detitioner shait decide the r4 pass appF'op-iate order Within the same, in accordance with iotw. With the direction afor4daid, the pet Parties are enti+led for t ttiiityfl-i ii*«iTffto&<Rit^i<. ^ari^lHsn^T from todcy raising ail hjs snsvansas, kfter considerino the ooints raised bv The •presen'tation in an objsc+ive manner wd two months ft'om^'ri-'s date of receipt of •ition atands dispoaed of. ;ertifi®dcopy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge -T"w-,^^41-<JS.--f