W \‘V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH :AT BILASPUR DlViSION BENCH Coram : HON’3LE $HRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRE SUNEL KUMAR SWHA, J. Writ Petition (S? N0. 5387 of 20 3 : - Dr. J.K. Jain. Slo iate Shri P.C. Jam, aged abou: 56 years, RIG. PETITEONER 9/1072, near income Tax Commissioner Office, Bharti Nagar, Bilaspur, . district Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of C-hhatt‘isgarh, through the $ecretary Hrgher Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chanceiior Pt. 8undar Lai Sharma (Open) University, Biiaspiir (C.G.) 3. Pt. Sundar Lai Sharma (Open) University, Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur, through the Vice Chancellor, Near Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Park, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur, (C.G.) 4. Vice Chanceiior, Pt. Sundar La! Sharma (Open) University, Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur, Near Pandit Deendayai Upadhyay Park, Vyapar Vihar, Biiaspur, (C.G.) 5. Executive Councii, Pt. Sunder Lal Sharma (Oeen) University, Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur, Near Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Park, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur, (C.G.) 6. Dr. T.D. Sharma, Vice Chancelior, Pt. Sunder Lai Sharma (Open) University, Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur, Rio Jashpur House, in front of income Tax Office, Bharti Nagar, Biiaspur, {c.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDiA Present: Shri Prateek $harma‘ learned counsel for the petétioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, ieamed Deputy Advocate General with Shri Akhi! Agrawai, learned Panel Lawyer, :or the State/ respondent No.1. 8hri Akhilesh Dalapatl, learned counsel for respondents Nor 3, 4 & 6. ORDER (15m september, 2909; The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri Prateek Sharmax learned counsel for the petitioner, on account of the developments after filing of the writ petition, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the Constitutionai validity of the amendment in the Statute No.7 of the University, with the iiberty of tiling another writ petition for the reliefs sought in this writ petition and other anciliary' reliefs, if the future deveiopments so warrant. 2. Permission granted. 3. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Set/— sunil Kumar Sinha it Sd/-L Judge 1 ( Chief Justice nlmml