IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2008 / 13TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 38260 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SRSH KUMARI, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.SREEKUMAR, WORKING AS UPSA, H.S.S. VALAYANCHIRANGARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= W.P.(C) No. 38260 of 2007(D) ======================= Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a U.P. School Assistant working in an aided school. She was originally appointed with effect from 25.8.2000 till the existence of the vacancy. But the 1st respondent approved such appointment only upto 30.3.2001. In the above circumstances, the manager re-appointed the petitioner with effect from 6.6.2001. Against the order of the 1st respondent approving the appointment only upto 30.3.01, the manager of the school filed appeal which was rejected by the Deputy Director as also the Director of Public Instruction. Against the same the petitioner filed Ext.P7 revision petition before the 4th respondent. Petitioner now confines her relief for a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a W.P.(C) No. 38260/2007/D -2- direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the manager of the school. If the petitioner so chooses, it would be open to her to file additional pleadings with materials in support of her claim and the 4th respondent shall consider the same while disposing of Ext.P7. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp