Crl.M.No.M-14598 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-14598 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 18, 2010 Narender .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K.Sanyal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.25, dated 18.3.2010, under Sections 307, 34 IPC, and under Sections 285, 336, 216, 120-B, and 25/54/59 of Arms Act & 3/33/89 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, added later on, registered at Police Station Bahal, District Bhiwani. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against petitioner-accused are that he alongwith co-accused used abusive language against the complainant and her family members in the name of their caste as complainant belongs to scheduled castes and petitioner belongs to non-scheduled castes. When complainant and her family members objected to the playing of deck at a high volume in front of their house, applicant alongwith co-accused took the vehicle in reverse gear and drove the same in high speed with intention to kill the complainant and other members of her family and he hit against complainant Smt. Bhanwari Devi and her sister in law Smt.Sushila Devi. Both of them sustained injuries and their legs were fractured. Complainant also suffered spine injury. Hence in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused. Crl.M.No.M-14598 of 2010 (O&M) -1- Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Narender for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed being devoid of any merit. 18.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge