AO No.216 of 2009 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Rawat, Advocate for the respondents. Heard. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that so far as the quantum of compensation is concerned, he is not challenging the order impugned. He confined his prayer only upto the extent that the loan, directed to be deposited by way of FDR by the concerned tribunal, is against the provision of MACT Act and he prays to release the same in favour of the appellants. In support, he has placed reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in case of General Manager Kerala State Road Transport Corporation Trivandrum Vs. Sushma Thomas reported in 1994 2 SCC 176 wherein the principle of deposit is given and it is held that in case of major, there is no such provision to retain the amount by way of FDR. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court, without going into the merits of the case, the appeal is dismissed. However, the learned Tribunal is directed to release the amount of FDR and rest of the amount in favour of the appellants, if the appellants apply for withdrawal of the amount of compensation and move appropriate application before the tribunal concerned. Record of the case be sent back to the trial court forthwith. (B.S. Verma, J.) 11.3.2011 RG