—78 'S'si '^nwf, »nlwi<s, Riiciwy *<I*ICTI th*<l«h-••—-"•----"•-"---••"-•^ 2QO 3II^il 'q^i' ('yf^y^q) 311^1 ^it Pi-fi'* ^TT sn^T sh*iiq> KJ TOnw^ifiraan^i wjp.ist a pEnnoireR: ^u^waa Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Narayan Pr^ad Jaiswal, aged about 19 ycars, R/o ViB+ge Kharve, Janpad Panchayat Kas|dol, District Raipiu- C.G. -Ver»u»- KBSPOBDEMTS: 1. Sta 2. 3. 4. te of CIihattisgarh, through the Sec(«tary Panchayat Departnicnt, D.K.S. Bh^wan, Raipiu-, C.G. CoBector, Raipur, Distdct Raipur, TN 'ca; Th4 Exdcutivc PBTITIOHBR: -Vie»«n») MBSPONDBirre: l. 2. Stdte ^ti<ii<i<ili ^mv^ tf Ts^ <P*t'^,l< ^sifinaii^t .811/09 ZUa Panchayat, fhrou^h tfae Chief Ofi&cer, Raipur CG Jat(pad Panchayat Kasdol, fhrough Ifac Ch|sf Executivc Officer, Kasdol, Distnct Ra4>ur(C(}) 5. Thcj Otam Panchayat Kharve, fhrough fhe Se4?etaiy, Gxam Paachayat Kharve, Jai^pad Panchayat Kasdol, District Ra4)ur(CO) W.P.ISI N6.881/09 Sidkharii Rafcur Kzuaar Sahu, S/o Shri Sahu, aged about 23 years, ViBage-Kharffe, Tahsil- Kasdol. Distt. -(CG) Ballnukund R/<1 of ChbattisgaA, fhrough the Pancliayat, D.K.S, Bhawan, R^sur, C.G. Executive Qfficer, District Pai^ctoyat Raipur, Diatt^ Raipiir Sctjrctaty SsSpvr, Cldcf '\ ^:^;;;;^^!^'^^: XI-HC—78 fSI ^1141<"f*l; ®li)'M<l<o,fsiCTWy *iwcn (»>*ii<h •WI. 200 SII^T 4^1+ ('^'ll^l'i^) an^il^a l<-f TraTsn^TWTW gwiw ^ftH an^i -2- 'ittWl^l^'f 41*«4f'^fe^sl <T^4^K ^ •aifn*! «i^ 3. 4. CIue|f Executive Officcr, Janpad Paii4hayat Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) Sardaach of Gram Paactiayset, Kharve, Blocl (Writ Petitions iinder Articte Slmde Betidti Hi»a*tlteUurt DNitt»dllfcIlttl^a^J. Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate fo| t-Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (CG) 226 offhc 0>nsfitution oflndia) 9-2-2009^ t Shri Rakcsh Paadcy, Ady^cate for fhe petitioner in W.P. (S) No.811/09. - the pctitioner in W.P.(S) No.821/09. Shri Paakaj Shrivastava, F^icl Lawycr for thc Statc. Heafd. W.P. (S) No.811/09 fis W.P^S) No.821/09 are bcing disposcd of by this coinnton order as the diak>ute in both the pctitfons relates to appointment of Panchayat Kamu| in Graln Panchayat -Kharve, Block Kasdol. 1 Grievance of fhc petitionei] Sarpanch of Oram Psaicbayat Kfa|arve issucd ordcr of appointmcnt la favour of fhe petitioner vide Anatjxure P-2. However, even wifhout his reinoval, thc respondcnt-Cluef Raipiu- has mitiatcd recruitment in W.P. (S) No.811/09 is fhat fhc |Executivc Officcr, Jfla Panchayat, ^rocccdings for Panchayat Kanni of Graiu Panchayat Kharve. On the ofher haad, grietance of thc petitioncr in W.P.(S) No.821/09 is that the pctt<a4 appoiutment on thc post of Pat|chayat Karaai vidc resolution dated incr was duly reooauaended for SSSSaSBSS^K'eiSiSVff^K13"'"'''' XI-HC—78 'SST -i||4iy*t, 8)Ti1'H<i<o, fawi+fy WHfn tKtllcS •^ 200 sn^r'qiR? ('j^Iai'i'?) s^yv (<-ii+ ^TT 3ff^?T st)*ii<t> (wiw flfta an^i ^- ^*I<lI<'t'tft<;1 *iw^ ^ fs^ •(T^t^R ^3JRPI3»1^!T 1.1.2008 ofthe Gram Panchayat fbarve. Howcver, the resolution could not be approved by the Grain Sa^)ha on the pretext fhat Mama. offhe petitioner is the Paach ofGram P^nchayat Shri Sahu, leamed coun^cl for fhe pctttioner submits that relation of fhe matemal iincle «|oes not faU within thc definition of 'relation' under Section 69(1) o^ Adhiruyam and therefore, fhe petitioner as Panchayat Karmi in thc Chhattisgarh Graia Panchayat objectlon s^aiast appoitttmcnt of te Gram Sabha was not valid. On the ofher baad, leame<| counsel for thc State submits that siaGe both the pctitioners' candit^ature for appointment on the post of Panchayat Kanni of Gram Kharv^ has uot becn duly approvcd by the Gram Sabha, they could not be a^poiated as pcr existing poUcy of ffae State Gkwemtnent Hc further su^inits that ia fhe meatiwhile, therc is a chaage in pt>Ucy and now aB th^ appointments of Panchayat Karmi is to be inade by District Paachaj'at.l Having heard learacd coiu^sel for fhc parties, having regard to fbc fa.et fhat none of the pctition^rs have bccn duly appointed by the said Graaa Paaachay&t, they do n<^t have any tegal right to fbe jpost of Panchayat Karmi and, fherefoiiel the pctition at their nistaacc for direction to the respondents in fhi Karmi is not mamtamable. Thc petitions ate accoiding^r disnussed. A copy ofthis orderbc kept b matter ofappoiatment of Paachayat in the recoid ofW.P.(S)No.82l/09. Sd/- Dhkendra Mishra Judge ^ ;'i^....;