WP 3650/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3650/2011 Arvind Eknath Gophane V/s The Superintendent of Police, Rural, Aurangabad & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri S.S. Kazi, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. Date: 05.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner challenges the order of the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal thereby dismissing the Original Application filed by the present petitioner. Shri S.S. Kazi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that since the services of the petitioner were on compassionate ground, the same could not have been terminated without following the departmental proceedings. WP 3650/11 2 The perusal of the order passed by the learned Tribunal so also the order appointing the petitioner, would reveal that the petitioner’s appointment was purely on temporary basis. In any event, as observed by the learned Tribunal, it would reveal that the termination is simplicitor and not punitive in nature. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. The petition is rejected. (R.M. Borde, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 05.09.2011 ndk/c591126