IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4429 of 2009 DR.PUSHPA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 09.04.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The relief prayed for in this writ application is to be considered for promotion from the Subordinate Education Service to the Bihar Education Service Class II. The plea is that despite availability of vacancies and the eligibility of the petitioner she has only been made an Incharge Principal when she is entitled to promotion on a substantive post of Principal. Learned Counsel for the State draws attention of the Court to the pleadings in Para 14 of the writ petition that the petitioner was granted such promotion but which has been withdrawn in light of certain orders of this Court, which have not been placed on record by the petitioner. In absence of necessary pleadings and materials on record this Court finds it difficult to pass any positive orders or give any specific directions. The right to be considered for promotion cannot be denied. But such consideration has to be in accordance law. There are no materials on record with regard to the said writ petition in pursuance of which the promotion granted to the petitioner has been withdrawn. The only appropriate to be passed therefore is to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion in accordance with law and the direction that may be contained in this regard in CWJC Nos. 1091/2006 and 14678/2006.This Court expects that the respondents while making such consideration shall act in accordance with the direction inclusive of any time limit that may have been given in the aforesaid writ application expeditiously. The writ application stands disposed off with the aforesaid observations. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)