IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8763 of 2011 Date of Decision : 11.10.2011. Bhupender Singh ……Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. R. K Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G with Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. for respondents –State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner in this petition is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the private respondent. The petitioner is PTA appointee and the private respondent is regular appointee. According to the petitioner, he can work only in the place/school where he was appointed, whereas the private respondent, being regular appointee, can work in any open vacancy. In case the petitioner can point out any suitable vacancy, where the private respondent is willing to be accommodated, the petitioner may point out the same before the second respondent along with willingness letter, in which case, the second respondent will take appropriate action within another one month. In case the petitioner is otherwise eligible, he may be continued in the resultant vacancy till he is otherwise replaced by regular recruitee. 2 2. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (rana/pankaj)