HIGH WRT OF CHHATTI56ARH AT BILAsPUR W. P.(5) No. 2206 0f 200! Pefi‘h‘oner : Mohifkxl Dansena 5/0 5hiv Pr-asad Dansena Aged abouf 60 year's, Pos'r - Asst Teacher, R/o Village Bhelawafika, Post Urdana Tah. & Disff. Ruigarh (6.6.) Versus Respondems 1. Sfal'e of Chhaffisgarh Through : Secretary Schoo! . Educafion Deparfmenf D.K.5. Bhwvan, Raipur (6.8,) 2, Disfr‘icf Educafion Officer Raigarh, Dist : Raigarh- (C.6.) 3. Block Educafion Officer Bicck - Raigarh Disfricf - Raigarh (C.6.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Jusiice Safish K. Agnihcfri. Present Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Advocate for The pe‘Htioner. Mr. Arvind Dubay, Panel Lawyer for fhe Sfafe/responden‘rs. O R D E R (Passed on this 10” Day of April, 2007) 1. The quesl‘ion of law involved herein asfo whefher The peiificner is em‘i‘rled i'o regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial aeintment or from pp the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved the present writ petition are the same to that of in W. P. (5) No. 813/2007 (Rm Kumar Sahu and others vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh oi another), which was allowed vide order dated 12.02.2007. 3. In View of the above-stated submissions mode by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri 5 Judge