HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION No.20436 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner has prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents to investigate into FIR.No.188 of 2011 and arrest the accused viz. Ailaveni Rajender. It is averred in the affidavit that, despite a case in FIR.No.188 of 2011 has been registered, neither the respondents had arrested the accused nor had investigated into the matter. Sri Bathi Venkateswarlu, learned Counsel for the accused in FIR.No.188 of 2011 viz. Ailaveni Rajender, submits that while the accused has not been arrayed as a party to the Writ Petition, this Court, by order dated 26.07.2011 in Crl.P.No.6148 of 2011, stayed the arrest of the accused and directed that the investigation may go on and that the learned Counsel for the petitioner in the Writ Petition had appeared in Crl.P.No.6148 of 2011. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner herein had knowledge of the fact that this Court had stayed the arrest of the accused in Crl.P.No.6148 of 2011, he has not brought the same to the notice of this Court and states that he did not receive a copy of the order. Though the copy of the order has not been received by the learned Counsel, he obviously knew that the arrest of the accused in FIR.No.188 of 2011 had been stayed by this Court. In view of the above, no orders need be passed directing the respondents to arrest the accused in FIR.No.188 of 2011. In case, the statement made by the learned Counsel for the accused in FIR.No.188 of 2011is false, learned Counsel for the writ petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate application. The Writ Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J Date:27.07.2011 usd