IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18420 of 2011 KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMA @ KRISHNA SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.06.2011. Heard. After going through the rejection order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Anticipatory Bail Petition No.81 of 2011 what this court gathers is that the learned Judge was not allowed by the petitioner to apply his mind to the facts of the case and to pass an order after that, because the petitioner was himself praying for the final order as he was not ready to take back the lady to her matrimonial house. The court simply does not appreciate the attempt of a litigant of not allowing a Judge to pass an order and this could be one of the grounds for directing re-hearing of the petition. Besides the above, the court was also faced with a submission that initially the petitioner might not have been inclined to take back the lady to his family fold, but now good reasons have prevailed upon him and he is fully desirous of taking back the lady to his family. In that light a 2 direction is being issued to the learned Sessions Judge to restore the anticipatory bail petition no.81 of 2011 to its original number and file, re-hear the petition and pass an appropriate order. The petitioner shall be free to raise any argument besides the argument which has been raised by him before this Court and the learned Sessions Judge, if he so desires, may hold some conciliatory proceedings either in his chambers or in his court room and pass an appropriate order thereafter in Daudnagar P.S.Case No.90 of 2010. With the above direction and observation, this petition stands disposed of. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)