IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27906 of 2010 AJAY SINGH @ HARHU SINGH, SON OF PARASURAM SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARAHIYA DHANRAJ TOLA, POLICE STATION BARAHIYA, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.8.2010. This is the second attempt for grant of bail even within a period of six months from the rejection of earlier bail petition. Petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected on 12.3.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.2471 of 2010. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner was in custody, direction was given to the court below to proceed with the trial expeditiously and conclude the same as early as possible. Shri Umesh Prasad Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition, submits that after rejection of bail of the petitioner, two witnesses were examined, one of the witnesses was informant, who was also one of the victim and she had categorically stated that the petitioner was not participant in the occurrence. Learned counsel has further submitted that P.W.7, who too, was examined after rejection of earlier order, was a 2 medical expert and had conducted medical examination, had not supported the prosecution case. On aforesaid grounds, prayer for bail has been revived. I have also heard Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. It was submitted that earlier on merit, prayer for bail was rejected and as such there is no point to reconsider the prayer for bail within such short time. Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, the court has also perused the materials on record. It need not be reiterated that in the present case, the allegation was that the informant and her daughter were raped by the accused persons and there was specific allegation in the F.I.R. against the petitioner also. He was named in the F.I.R. Keeping in view the fact that recently prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected, there is no point to reconsider the prayer for bail that too, even before expiry of six months. Accordingly, prayer for bail is again 3 N.H./ rejected. However, the trial court is directed to take every steps so that trial may be concluded expeditiously. With above observation and direction, this petition is dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)