dp '^ ~ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE_HIGH<COURTQF CHHATHSGAR AT BILASPUR (CHHA'mSGARHl WR!T_£m3TIQNiS)NO.%,^8°/2009. ^ PETITIONER: Smt.SushUa Kerketta, wife ofKishore Kerketta. Aged about 40 years, Lower Division Teacher, Primary Girls School, Duldula, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents a> -^St^ ^s^y ^y^ ^ y ^^ 1. State of Chhattfsgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal welfare Department Ministry B.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare ^'Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. S.Block Education Officer, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4(. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA ^sf •*ii<<i<t<<, ®Ti1<rf'ic,[siwiyy M^:i^)..f^l:..^^) sn^i ^^^('iqi^iyi) '^T^H^T s?i*it^ 71± <B: Hon.Jvlr^ilustjce Pritjntet ^^. fv. ^^..Vf.^ !U, ihrlC.J.K. Rao counsei for ihri Shashank Thakur PL fo maKe At the out set counsei for thel withdraw this petitibn with Slbeny m^ concerned. He aiso seeks a direct deciding the representation of the pei to him case of the petitioner.js squan v/rEt petition(3) No. 6257/2008. State counse! submits that ^ statement before this Court whether ^ the order passed in aforementloned if the petitioner makes ^ representati^ sarne shali be decided strictly in a; Accordingiy, the petition is dis| aforesaid. !f the petitioner makes respondent within a period of one m^ of this order; the same is expected to hvo mont'ns from the date of its receipl It is made clear that this Courtl the case and the authorities co| rspressntation of the petltioner strictlyl 'Alrit CCOlld enl<i^<i1'i ^WtfT'^f^ i?< O^^K iwaKer he petitioner. the respondents/State. petitionsr submits that he wants So |<e a representation to the authority jon to the concerned authority for ptioner at an eariy date as according ^!y covered with the order passed in |t this stage he can not make any [asQ of the petitioner is covered with |rit petition. However, he submjts that [>n to the concemed respondent, the iance with law. ^issed as withdrawn wlfh liberiy as ^ representation to__the concernsd ^nth frorn the date of receipt of copy |be decidedwithin a further period of ihas notcommented on the merits of teerned are free to decide the in accordance wiSh lav,'. ^'^^ ' ^ ^?^6 ^ire^r ^N ^OIT?RT : -FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.