HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4820 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have made a representation on 28-12-2010 to the respondents 2 and 3 alleging that the 4th respondent is making construction in the immediate neighbourhood of the petitioner, without obtaining any permission. Her grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for 1st respondent and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent 2 and 3. 3. The allegation of the petitioner that the 4th respondent is making construction without obtaining any permission from the 2nd respondent needs to be verified. If that allegation is true, the 2nd respondent must ensure that no construction takes place. Even if permission is accorded, the construction must be strictly in accordance with the same. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to take necessary steps on the representation dated 28-12-2010 submitted by the petitioner. If it becomes necessary to take any action against the 4th respondent, notice under the relevant provisions of law shall be issued. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J February 28, 2011. KTL