^ c< ^' ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA^PUR CHHATTISGARH W. P^N_0, 2-DLV /2003 WRIT PETITIPNUNDER ARTICLE 226/22^ OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITION] '^fS^ ^^' ^8\ ••<?v.>& <>s?- RESPONDENT M/s. Khandelwal Dal MU1 Dhamdha Road, Chikhali, Diyft. Durg (C.G) registered Partnership firm Through Partner Shri Kishan Khandelwal, aged 50 years S/ o. Shri Rarudhan Khandelwal, R/o.infrontofPunjab National Bank, Station Road Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Smt. Echha Devi Lunawat, Aged70 yearsW/o. Babu Lal Lunawat, R/o. StationRoad Durg (C.G.) ^) ^ XI-HC-22 ~5^ •wwvW.'iS^wis.Kviwy. sn^i^ii l^roanl^r Sf:-^ ^^ wiw •"l-.^^Ci^*'' i-m?)T giisrai ^f.AU^S-^. ^^T" sn^i'^RIIWH)??! bejing docuciients prai|;ticiag 26.03^004 Smt. Sudha^rawal, couns^l Thc petitionjer has prcferred| of thc Constitutmn of India 29.03.2003 p^scd by fhe leame^ Cinl Siut N0.12-B/2001 wherebj herein for pBoductfon offhe Brief facts teadixig to SSa^, respondcnt herein, who is a filed a cavil suit agaiast the Rs.2,72,000/-. In Paragraph 3 ofl fhe respondcnt lieicin started petitioner's finn 6xsa. fhc year p.a and afl tfaose ainount were been furtfaer naentfoned tfaat present petitmner waa aSso been mentioned that ftom 01.04. are due ayeaast tfae petitfoner as are due towaids fhe iaterest. Written statement on behalf filed. However, an appHcation the trial Coiirt seeking direction producc his incoiuc-tax ictum, aad the balance sheet for Ihe 31.3.2000, but fhe same was imi»ugncd order dated 29.03.200^ throi^gh per|od qirafyrih iniRff'9'feczt ^R?n ^? aifigtT an^i for fhc peti.tk)ner. |this writ pctltk>n under Artfcte 227 s^yieved by the order-dated 6& Addl. DMtrict Judge, Duig in fhe qpplicatton of fhe petitiona- was rcjcctcd. crf fhis writ petition ass that fhe ]awyer on Inconae-tax side, twtittoiier hereia for rrcovciy of plaiut it has been xneationed (hat depositing fbe anaount in the 9|92-93 againrt fhe iuterest @ 12% iljeposited fhroi^h cfaeques. It bas am.ouatt(J%repaM by fhe cheques aad ultimately it has {9W to 01.04.2000 Rs.2,00,000/- t>rmcipal amoiiat and Rs.72,000/- 19192 wttatever waslfiled oS the petitu>ner herein has beea by fhc pctUioner hereia before |agamst the respoadcnt hcrein to a^count of interest received by him ranging bctwcen 01.04.1988 to I'ejected by fhe trial Coart vidc hcdding (hat tticse documents are^ XI-HC-22 ':gsiM [SSsSsSSSS ':'•^S ^FW%lM'iWe£®Bg® ffiSMSBSSBS^:®'''!^ W(R'ff,gil|l* _......^^.</s..^.:....;.^ •fe^s.r' 311^1 ^iT fa-ii* snin ^*ii<h ^ifia ^..... ..rf§& .xSs^" 2-}~ <*l^i<'l''il-< MWfS 4 'fetSt <r»i<tti< i;3iPaH3fi^i pet(tfoacr witholit docujnents not necessaiy fer (he just dccmto^ cannot be directed to pioducc the^e I have heard lcamed cotlasel Leamed counsel for fhc bas dedded fhe appKcation the petitioiier and inoreover, by fhe respoudent are bandwritten| As far as (he question of ipi concemed; as mentioned above, fy.e recoveiy of fhe principal anioiunt nientioned fhat aU fhe amount fhus, fhe suit is based on fhe ch|s piieseat pcti.tk>neq fhcrefore, I am has not committed any fflegaUty appUcation offha petttioner herein In view of the abovc, I do petitun, whteh is liable to be djsvw abd iftas :h|sqi However, in view of fhe for fhe petitioDer fhat wifhout trial Court has rejccted the a; documents; it is expccted that in trial Court wffl give proper With the afoicsaid directioii, Certified copy as per Rutes. of fhc suit, tfaCTcfoae, thc plaintifl' doc'ucasnts. for fhe petitioner. subiaits fhat the trial Oourt giwng opportBnity of hearing to fifcd in support offhe plaint [and fhey are not ia proper form. ipegaUly in fhe impi^ned ardcr is respondeat hcrein fited a sult for interest tfacreon aitd it bas beea. advanccd by way of chcques, ;h|sques giveu by fhe plaintiff to tfae |of thc opinion that the trial Court |or incgularily wfaik rejecting fhe |for produciag fhe documente. find any substance in fhu writ ifesed aud is disinissed. inade by teamed counsel any opportenKy of hearing the ip^Hcation fifcd for producttoa of f(iture before passiag any order fhe to ffae pedtioaer. pie petitioa stands dlsposed. nbt sublmissioa giwpg opportu4itjr of heariag <^ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo judge :['qra'?ngq~