IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.437 of 2011 Ashok Kumar Singh, son of Ram Prasad Singh, resident of Section 8 (C), Road No.31, Quarter No.1109, P.S.-Harla, District- Bokaro, State- Jharkhand. ………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sandhya Kumari, daughter of Kasi Nath Singh, resident of village- Uttardahan, P.S.-Tier, District- Bhojpur. …..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 22.11.2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on record. The petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 5.03.2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Arrah in Maintenance Case No.126/2010 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.5000/-per month to his wife, opposite party no.2 as interim maintenance. Heard Md. Ataul Haque, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh, the learned A.P.P. for the State. The main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that his wife opposite party no.2 has been getting Rs.4850/-per month as per direction of the Air 2 force Headquarter (Annexure-7 of the supplementary affidavit) and as such, this amount should be adjusted against the amount of ad interim maintenance granted by the learned Principal Judge. The learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner may file an application for adjustment of the aforesaid amount from the amount granted by the learned Principal Judge. In this view of the matter, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the learned Principal Magistrate, Family Court, Arrah. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)