IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30036 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER ----------------- TOOGLE TOMS GEORGE, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.GEORGE THOMAS, PLACKYIL HOUSE, SOUTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL SRI.N.M.MADHU SMT.C.S.RAJANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 562. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI , SC , THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 30036 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX ---------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ---------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET. EXHIBIT P1(A): TRUE COPY FO THE HALL TICKET. EXHIBIT P1(B): TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST. EXHIBIT P2(A): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST. EXHIBIT P2(B): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3(A): TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3(B): TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 12/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 12/10/2011. EXHIBIT P4(A): TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 12/10/2011. EXHIBIT P4(B): TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 12/10/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 30036 of 2011 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 11th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner submits that he appeared for B.Tech examination and failed in some papers. He submitted Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3(b) applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of his results. 2. I heard Standing Counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the application has been received and is otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No.30036/2011 : 2 : 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the University for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/11/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge