1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1712/2010. (Mahadeo s/o Gangadhar Dadgal Vs. The Ahmednagar District Central Co.op.Bank Ltd., through its General Manager.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SS Tope, Adv. for petitioner; Mr.NV Gavare, Adv. for Respondent-Bank *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 18 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Mr.Gavare, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent-Bank, informs the orders under challenge dated 14.1.2005 and 18.09.2006 are indeed complied with as the writ petitioner has deposited the entire amount with the bank. 3) Mr.Tope, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has his grievance against the very manner of recovery executed by the bank. He informs, that there is obvious breach of Section 44-A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, as for a loan of Rs.6,20,000/-, the writ petitioner is required to part and pay Rs.44,00,000/-. 4) At this stage, on instructions, learned Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to 2 withdraw the writ petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings permissible under the law. 5) Writ petition disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty as indicated above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/