HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3401 Qf2007 : 1. N.K.Thakur Age about 48 year, Asstt.Teacher S/o Sfari Jefhanand Thakur Middle School Kache Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt - Kanlcer(C.G.) 2. Kamal Singh Tirsunia Age about 50 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Sliri Saganu Ram Priinary School Ghotia Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt -Kanker(C.G.) 3. Tijau Ram Darpatti Age about 49 year, Asstt. Teacher S/'o Shri Sahdev Ram Primary School Dabkatla Block - Bhamipratappur, Distt — Kanker(C.G.) 4. Charan Singh Kosma Age about 53 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Late Shri Tilak Ram Kosma Primary School Doneargaon Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt—Kanker (C.G.) 5. Chandrakant Sahu Age about 48 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Brijlal Sahu Pnmary School Halkarra Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt KankerCC.G.) 1. State Govt. ofCfahattisgarh Throueh Secretarv Tribal Weifare Department & Education Departmerrt D.K.S. Bhawa, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. Astt. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Da>artment Kanker Disst. — Kanker (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Kanker, District Kaaker(C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Bhanupratappur District-KankerfC.G.') _ \ ^ 5. Treasure & Accounts Kanker, District - KankeT(C.G.) ; ' :' .'"^ ,'" WRFT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA. Slngle Bench : Hon'ble Justice Shrl Satish K. Agnihotri, Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Sliri Y.S.Thakur, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. • ORDER , . ' • (Passed on 21stday of June, 2007) 1. TTie question of law involved herein is asto whether fhe petitioners are entitledto regular pay scale w.e.ftiiedate pfinitial appointment or from fhe date of completion ofprobation period. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jomtly submit fhat the facts and question of law inyolved in ttie present writ petition are fhe same as to that ofin W.P.(8) No. 58 6f 2007 (Paras Nath Gupta Vs. State of Ghhatdsgarh & Others). which was allowed vide order dated 15.01.2007. 3. In view offlie above-statedsuhmissions made by leamed counsel for the oarties. the writ petition is allowed in tiie same tenns. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge