IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arbitration Case No. 45 of 2009 Date of Decision: 14.12.2009 M/s Vinko Auto Industries Ltd. ..Petitioner Versus Transport Commissioner, State Transport Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Rana, Addl. A.G. Haryana for the respondents. ***** MUKUL MUDGAL, C.J. (Oral) A combined reply on behalf of respondent No.2 has been filed in Court which is taken on record. It is stated in the reply that Arbitrator has already been appointed, therefore, the grievance raised by the petitioner in this petition stands redressed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that his client is satisfied with the appointment of the Arbitrator and this petition be disposed of. Arbitration Case No. 45 of 2009 [2] Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the parties to appear before the Arbitrator appointed by the respondents on 11.01.2010. On the first date of hearing, the petitioner shall file a statement of claim and response thereto be filed within four weeks thereafter. The Arbitrator shall make endaveour to dispose of the reference not later than six months from the date of filing of the reply by the respondents. (MUKUL MUDGAL) CHIEF JUSTICE 14.12.2009 'ravinder'