IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 3257 of 2009. Decided on: 05.07.2010. Ritu Raj Verma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “(ii) That in view of the submissions as made in detailed above, the petitioner may kindly be held entitled to grant of all the benefits from the date of his initial appointment i.e. 31.03.1961 as prayed for and for grant of such benefits as considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (iii) Any other suitable relief which this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper under the given facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. According to the petitioner, Annexure P-3, judgment passed by this Court on 31.7.2008 in CWP No. 1802/2002 has attained finality. In case the petitioner is similarly situated person and his case is covered by the judgment, as contained in 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Annexure P-6, he cannot be discriminated. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law without discriminating the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 05, 2010. (bhupender)