1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 758 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2009 srk Baban Yashwant Ghuge & Ors. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Ms. Nisha S. Parab, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for the State. Mr. Shahajirao R Shinde for Union of India (Respondent No.3). CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE :- 21ST JUNE, 2010. P.C. : 1 This is an application for seeking a directions, directing the respondents to return the property attached by the Investigating Officer and also to implement the order passed by the Sessions Court, Nashik in Special Case No. 8 of 2002. In the present case, prosecution was launched against the Applicants under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act and it was alleged that the Applicant has assets which are disproportionate to his known source of income. The Sessions Court 2 however pleased to acquit the Applicant of all the offences which are charged. The Sessions Court has also directed that this property which is attached will be returned. Against this order, the State has preferred an Appeal against the order of acquittal. Leave has been granted by this Court and the Appeal is admitted. 2 However, no application has been filed by the State Government seeking stay of the order passed by the Sessions Court. Thus, in view of this, the order passed by the Sessions Court will have to be implemented. The Government accordingly shall comply with the orders passed by the Sessions Court within six weeks from today. 3 Prayer clause (b) does not survive since the subsequent allowances have been released. 4 Reliefs claimed in prayer clause ( c) cannot be granted by this court. Liberty is given to the Applicant to take out appropriate proceedings. 5 Application, accordingly, is disposed of. 6 Certified copy is expedited. (V.M. KANADE, J.)