1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 192 OF 2011 (Vinayak Maroti Choudhary vs. The Divisional Commissioner & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Amit Joshi, Advocate (appointed) for the applicant. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 08, 2011. Heard Shri Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Mirza, learned APP for the respondents. The petitioner preferred an application for grant of parole on 03.02.2011. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said application has not been decided, hence, he has approached this Court. The affidavit tendered by the APP shows that the petitioner was granted parole by order dated 18.02.2011. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. In this view of the matter, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. The advocate appointed for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. 2 Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is a convict in Central Prison, Nagpur. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.