IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.500 of 2007 ANANT MOHAN JHA Versus NAND MOHAN JHA & ORS ----------- 5. 16.9.2010. By the impugned order, the court below has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for extending the time for incorporating the names of the heirs of the deceased respondents, allowed by the earlier order dated 20.5.2005. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that since the amendment of the plaint by inserting the name of the legal representatives of the deceased respondents have not been allowed by extending such time, that being an interlocutory order this Civil Revision would not be maintainable in view of the law laid down by this Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675 as well as by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to convert this Civil Revision into a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 Permission is accorded. Let the petitioner convert this Civil Revision into a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within three weeks, failing which this Civil Revision shall stand rejected as not maintainable without further reference to a Bench. No order is being passed on the office notes dated 15.9.2010 at this stage as this Civil Revision has already been allowed to be converted into a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. P.S. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)