IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35117 of 2011 ====================================================== Raja S/O Shri Raghunath Singh R/O Village - Gara, P.S. Patepur, District - Vaishali At Hajipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.K.Prasad, Addl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA) 2 24-10-2011 Heard . The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner has been arraigned as an accused in the present case on the basis of the alleged confession made by a co-accused Md. Suleman before the police. It is further submitted that no recovery has been made either from the house or from the possession of the petitioner. It is highlighted that the petitioner is a man of absolutely fair antecedent and there is no criminal history against him. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 38 of 2011 dated 2.6.2011, subject to the conditions laid Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35117 of 2011 (2) dt.24-10-2011 2 / 2 2 down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and subject to the further conditions that: (A) One of the bailors must be government servant or close family members of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fail to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. BTiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)