..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1692 OF 2007 1.Iliyas Yusuf Munashi, & 2.Muktar Nazir Patel. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.U.R.Agandusrve, Adv. for the Applicants. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st June, 2007. DATED : 21st June, 2007. DATED : 21st June, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.58 of 2007 of Akluj Police Station, District - Solapur. The said case is under Sections 420, 468 of IPC. 3. Complaint came to be lodged by the Clerk of R.T.O. Office at Akluj when he came across forged documents relating to vehicles. It is the prosecution case that the documents were brought ..(2).. by coaccused Arjun Deshmukh. It is the prosecution case that the present applicants had given the said documents to Arjun Deshmukh. The investigation in the present case is going on. Hence at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicants. 4. Application is rejected. . Liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court after the chargesheet is filed. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)