xvmobw. r% P amm a “3% wuvfasbi <&w§z$#772 I g mg: w 91W §§ , immgwaq mawagmmm gmww. gimgg adwwngwaq ayE ‘ U/AN. £ N\\\o/W1 gay Ev mm \ew) . xaazdn ox .333... . . . . maggnnn a: §DA$$ 53W... 3:. x vw muza$m .. = ta arunwot aunn~o~ w XI-HC-22 :aaxmm$ta FW$ WW mm “um . ,W ‘ . ..w.~w.mo.-.;.b§;:/w my . WW W ’ %3T%11311%¥T D.B: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE A. HON’BLE SI-RI DILIP RAOSAHE 31.08.2005 Heard Ms. Sunita Ja’in, A Dy, AG. for the State. We have perused the affi< c,s,P,Kotwa1i, Bhilai Nagar Dis number of Criminal cases have the petitioner-Nandu Naidu unc In the said affidavit, the a the letter petition that Nandu Police has been denied. Ms. Sunita Jain learned has stated that she has instrt press her letter petition any furt Considering iall these as 'lel‘. disposed of. k sdl- ‘ chief Justice JmkB K.PATNAIK C.J & m B DESHMUKH J. M mious Curiae and Mr. NKAgrawal, lairit filed by the Office1‘~ir1-Charge, trict. Durg and we find that a large been registered against the son of er various provisions of the I.P.C. llegation made by the petitioner in Naidu was being tortured by the Amicus Curiae for the petitioner ctions from the petitioner not to nects, this letter petition stands Sdl- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge W .