>.!V s HK3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WRFT PETITION (C t No.1101/2010 RESPONDENTS 1 2 PETmONER Ramratan Jaiswal, aged about 79 years, S/o Late Harbilas Prasad Jalswal, R/o Ward No.15 Deorikhurd, Post Deoridih, District Bilaspur Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, ihrough its ^cretary, Cooperative Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies,Bilaspur 3 Cooperative Development Offlcer, Bilha and Liquidator, Police • Jangrih Nirman Samiti, OfRceJoint R^istrar Cooperative Soeieties, Composite Building, Bilaspur WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUT10N OF tNDIA . topearance: . Mr. Parag Kotecha, Counsel forthe petittoner. Mr.Shashank Thakur, Counset for respondents 1 & 2 on advance copy. ORAL^RDER (17.03.2010) SUNILKUtyiARSINHA.J. Heard onadmission. Petitioner-Ramratan Jaiswal has flled ttiis petitlon tor thefollowingreliefs: "I The Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to issue the wriVorder in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the application of the p^itioner and further please to direct the respondents to refund the principal amount along wnth an 24% interest perannum. - II The Hon'ble Court may Wndly be (^ease to call for the records of the case from the respondent. ttl Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstancss of the case and in the 1i,'^. V'•^w^ WRFT PETITION (C l No.1101/2010 shyna interest of justice and cost of the petition may be awarded in favourofthepetitioner." Mr. Parag Kotecha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a retired Head Constable. In the year 1980, when the petitioner was posted in P.S. Dabhra, he took the membership of Police Jan Grih Nfrman Samiti by depositing Rs.111/- (Rs. 100/- was realized as the amount of share + Rs.11/- was realized as the mernbership fee). He submits that the Society was coastituted for the purpose of providing residentlal houses to the members, but no house was provided to the petitloner and the petitioner retired on 30.04.1989. He submits that now, the Society is in llquidation and an Official Liquidator has been appointed under Section 70 (1) of the Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act, 1 9K). Since the house was not allotted to the petitioner, the petitioner filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Bilaspur, but the said complaint was dismissed on 26.12.2008. Thereafter, the petitioner made an application to the Joint Regisfrar, Co-operative Societies, on 21.01.2009, but the said authprity has also not taken any action on the applteation of ttie petitioner. Hence, the petitioner has flled'this wit petition. After going through the contents of the writ petition and on dueconsideration of the submisslons made by leamed counsel for the petitloner and further In vlew of the provisions of Sections 64 and 70 read wfl'th Section 6^1) of Vhe Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, l am not inclined to entertain this petition for hearing, Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate -statutory remedy under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Cooperatlve SocretiesAct, 1960. Certified copy as per rules. _ - ,a^s^a Sunu judfee