Civil Revision No. 6797 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6797 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision: November 26 , 2009 Narinder Pal Singh ...... Petitioner Versus Joga Singh and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order dated 29.7.2009 whereby the evidence of the petitioner as well as the other defendants has been closed. On the last date I put it to the learned counsel as to what proceedings had taken place during this interregnum. He, however, informs me that no proceedings have taken place since that date and the matter is still fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments. Learned counsel states that thogh numerous opportunities were granted to the petitioner, yet it would be in the interest of justice if one more opportunity is granted to him for concluding his entire evidence on his own responsibility. In my opinion considering the fact that no further proceedings have taken place after the impugned order and the fact that the petitioner has Civil Revision No. 6797 of 2009 (O&M) 2 undertaken to conclude his entire evidence on the next date which may be fixed by the trial Court on his own responsibility, it would further the ends of justice if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the circumstances the petition is allowed. The order dated 29.7.2009 is set aside and the learned trial Court is directed to permit the petitioner to lead his entire evidence on his own responsibility on the date which may be fixed before it. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 26, 2009 sunita