^ 4^A""" ^^'^9' ..- - ^^^r.%^ ^.^^^\'^^""""" ^f/era' IN THE HONrBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) N0. 67 8/ /2008 (1) ^ PETITIONER ^ttg^rfl' RESPONDENTS Laxminarayan Patel, S/o Shri Chandrika Patel, Aged about 31 years, R/o Village Bharari, Tahsil-Masturi, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS .1. ^2- /3. 4. 5. 6. .7. .8. 9. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Director Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) Manohar Lal Yadav, S/o Bhondal Prasad Yadav, Age not known, R/o Village-Bharari, Tahsit- Masturi, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) Durpati Bai, W/o Basant Kumar, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bharari, Dhuni Ram, Age not known Former Secretary Gram Panchayat Bharari, Ivgamesh, S/o Girdhari Patel, Age not known Lal Supet, S/o Bhagwanidas, Age not known 10. Prahlad, S/o Baliram, Age not known (2) |«"«aNi ,. 11. Kamal Kumar, S/o Jethuram, Age not known ^/12. Ravi, S/o Chandrika Prasad, Age not known /13. Gangadhar, S/o Genduram, Age not known /14. Jay Singh, S/o Shyam Singh, Age not known, Respondent No. 6 to 14 are resident of Village-Bharari, Tahsil-Masturi, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 15. Shailendra, S/o Aajuram ^ Suryawanshi, Age not known, R/o Village-Malhar, Tahsil- Masturi, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ 16. Gram panchayat Bharari, Janpad Panchayat Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3?T^T ^T f<Tli°h '^8TT 3T1^?T SbHW ^ ^ o '^Ef r^l^l<rl<LI, ^>tli'(-ljl<o, Jc«r!l-(-llj,< ^^.. *<Tq^(T «»*1(cb "^ 200 g 3^?r '^[^ (7i^3^T) ^<TrW^f^T3^T SB: Hon.Mr. Justice Pritinkerl 26.10.2010: Shri Ratnesh Agrawal coun] Shri Somesh Bajaj Dy. GA I <=hl4lf<n41l 'RTR^Tf ^f 'fe^ ^psi^K '^>^tf?R3^?T Diwaker sel for the petitioner. ior respondents 1 to 4. Shri Vivek Sharma counsel|for the respondent No.5. At the outset, counsel for |the petitioner submits that against the order impugned dated 20.10.20018 passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur, revision lies before th^ Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal e| at this stage the petitioner may be| liberty to file revision before the C| as the petitioner was wrongly proj revision before the Commissioneri direction may be issued to the Re| Commissioner under Rule 5 of the nd Revision) Rules 1995 and therefore 1 permitted to withdraw this petition with bmmissioner. He however submits that ^ecuting this petition before this Court, would be time-barred and therefore a ^isional Authority to dedde the revision on merits ignoring the point ofl limitation. To this, counsel for the respondents have no objection. Accordingly, the petition is aforesaid. Ifthe revision is filed be| one month from the date of receiri be decided on its own merits ignorj dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as fore the Commissioner, Bilaspur, within >t of copy of this order, the same shall ng the point of limitation. Registry to return the certi^ied copy of the order impugned dated 20.10.2008 to the petitioner prov|ded that a photocopy of the same is supplied by him. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge