CWP No.8578 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8578 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2011 Mrs. Millicent Bhatti ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Gourave Bhayyia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondents No.1, 4 and 5. None for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved at the action taken by the respondents for recoveries under the Revenue Recovery Act. The petitioner seeks for quashing of notice issued under Section 69(1) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. The counsel for the State clarifies in response to an argument by the petitioner that the petitioner being a woman, she cannot be arrested by contending that no action for arrest is being taken as the property is being attached through a warrant of attachment. The representation of the State through the counsel is taken as legitimizing only an action for recovery CWP No.8578 of 2010 (O&M) [2] through attachment and further process shall not be for recovery through arrest which is not permissible under the provisions of the Act. 2. With such clarification, the writ petition is disposed of. JULY 14, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE