•SWi.^ ^ ^i ^70 ^_ W THE HIGH COURT OF CHEIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRITPETITION('S)NCn.^-^^ /2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER I^-I^ nM^i- ^Jagatpal Ram, son of Shri D.R. Nikunj, ..^ ^ aged about 26 years, Assistant Teacher, A^'^tP' ^ Govemment Girls Primary School ' Vv** iffr T— -1-—^-— 'KT—^—— T^^ ^> ^ '\y>' y•l gPONDENTS y- ,,,F.O-C%1A CE7f;.^^ 6-. u' ~ Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer - Jashpur FE- XI-HC-78 sn^rwf^iTER c^TT3TT^Tsti^|cn '< SuUiash J: ..•s. << 3'S? "i||t|lfl^, 8x0+1116, Rli'lltty u . p.cs/' rfo. -7^(8^^o(; +11+1WI sh*lich CT? 200 aii^i ^ach (ytt^ci^er) ??cnw(rf5tTaii^r 09.01.2007 Mr. A.N. Bhakta, counsel foi^ the petitioner(s). Smt. Aiyu Ahiy'o, Deputy State/respondents. With the consent of leaifned counsel oppeoring for -the pdrt'ies, the writ petH'ion js heard »bK<r<1<(1-f >111l-lTfftel^'<(«l+<;K ^sTf^R'an^r fiovemment Advocate for the :inally and disposed of. Cbmmon order dictfft-ed in <|Vrit Petitton (S) No. 7484/2006 in open Court, passed separately. | A copy of this order be ploced on the record of the connected iwit petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. ^"^1 HKH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'M^ MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETTTEON tS.) N0.7484 OF 2006 Petitioner : Jagcrtpal Ram versus ftespondents ; Stnte of Chhatt-isgarh ond arwther Petitioner WRTT PETTTION tS.t N0.7486 OF 2006 : fianesh Ram Pradhan verais Iteswncksnts Storte ef ChhorttiS9arh ond another 4nd WRTT PFm-ION tS.) N0.7487 OF 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Kamla Rani Sinha versus Respondents ; Stnte of Chhatt-i^arh and others Present : Mr. A.N. Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner(s). Smt. Anju Ahuja, Oepirty fiovemment Advocate for •fhe State/respondents. OR DER (fasaed on this 9th doy of Jonuary, 2007) Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitfoners as well as for the State/respondents jointfy submit that -the focts ond questton of lcn» invotved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by -the decision of -this Court in the cose of Yeslweari- Kumar Wuvwdwaj vs. Munle^ial Capwwtion, Owy emd eawrtM^. r /.' 2. For the trforementwned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of m terms of the decision of this Court in •the matt-er of )teANBff/' Kumar KiaradwaJ (Supra), subject to verifioation of -the fact ns to whether the petitioners have ocquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Cerl-ificoftes at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of •this order be placed on •the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash 1 2006CII)MPJR-C696