IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2007 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 37705 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. TOMY,NEDUMKANDATHIL HOUSE, WARD NO.3, KOOVAPPADY PANCHAYATH KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. 2. XAVIER, MATTEKKADAN HOUSE, WARD NO.3, KOOVAPPADY PANCHAYATH KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. 3. T.R.JOHNY, THELAKKATTU HOUSE,WARD NO.2, KOOVAPPADY PANCHAYATH KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE KOOVAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH KOOVAPPADY P.O. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. REMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 37705 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: December 19, 2007 JUDGMENT The complaint of the petitioners, who are lorry owners, is against allotment of sand by the 3rd respondent Panchayat. Their complaints have been detailed in Exts.P4 to P6 representations filed before the 3rd respondent Panchayat. It is now stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that these complaints have not been examined by the Panchayat till date. It is in this background that the writ petition has been filed. 2. All that the petitioner now seeks is that the Panchayat may be directed to examine Exts.P4 to P6. 3. Without expressing anything on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, I dispose of the writ petition directing that the 3rd respondent shall take up and consider Exts.P4 and P6 representations made by the petitioners as WP(C) 37705/2007 Page numbers expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-