1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2010 ... Ulhas Raghunath Kolekar .. Petitioner v/s The Secretary, School Education Department and others .. Respondents ... Mr.A.M.Joshi for the Petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane A.G.P. for Respondents. ... CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 4th March,2010 P.C.:- 1. By this petition the Petitioner challenges the order passed by the 2 Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in Original Application as also in the Review application. By the order passed in Original Application the Government was directed to refund the amount of Rs.30,981/- which was deposited by the Petitioner. The Petitioner filed a Review Application claiming that the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has omitted to award interest to the Petitioner on the amount of gratuity i.e. Rs.3,75,871/-. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal disposed of the Review Application observing that this point was not argued before it when Original Application was decided by it. 2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Though it is true that there is a prayer in Original Application for interest, there are no pleadings in the Original Application saying how the 3 Petitioner has arrived at that amount. In our opinion, in the absence of any pleadings in support of the prayer, the M.A.T. was justified in not granting the review petition. We do not find any substance in the petition. Petition is rejected. ( D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) ( A.R.JOSHI,J)