1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2008 Chandrakant Tukaram Bharelar & anr........Appellants versus Pandurang Laxman Nanaware & ors......... Respondents. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare Sr. counsel i/b M/s YKS Legal for the Appellants Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Respondent no.1 to 3. Ms. S.P. Manchekar AGP for respondents 4 to 7. CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 01st OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Sakhare the senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. Limaye for respondent. Admit. Hearing expedited. 2. The following substantion questions of law arise for consideration: 1. Whether the lower appellate court could have granted declaration in favour of the respondent/plaintiff without impleading the appellant in the suit as party ? 2. Whether the appellants were necessary party to the suit when the respondents/plaintiffs challenge the permission granted for transfer of the 2 land in favour of appellants? 3. Whether the respondent's suit was maintainable in the absence of relief for declaration qua the sale deed of agricultural land bearing Gat Nos. 1367 and 1368 ? 4. Whether the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the respondent's suit since the respondent/plaintiff's grievance was about the regrant order? ( R.V. MORE, J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1524 OF 2006 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2008 Chandrakant Tukaram Bharelar & anr........Appellants versus Pandurang Laxman Nanaware & ors......... Respondents. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare Sr. counsel i/b M/s YKS Legal for the Appellants Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Respondent no.1 to 3. Ms. S.P. Manchekar AGP for respondents 4 to 7. CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 01st OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Sakhare the senior counsel for the appellant, Mr. Limaye for respondent. Interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) is granted. Civil Application is thus disposed of. (R. V. MORE, J.)