IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 4883 of 1995 Between: 1. Vadde Sattaiah, S/o Narsaiah, 49 years, R/o Kokapet, Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. 2. Balla Papaiah S/o Mallaiah, 40 years, R/o Kokapet, Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. Joint Collector, R.R.Dist. Hyderabad. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar (M), Rajendranagar, R.R. Dist. 3. S.N. Sastry (dismissed) C/o M.R.O. Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. Dismissed as per court order dt 7/1/03. 4. Harigovind Singh (dismissed) C/o M.R.O. Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. Dismissed as per court order dt 7/1/03. 5. Salima Fatima (dismissed) C/o M.R.O. Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. Dismissed as per court order dt 7/1/03. 6. S.M. Ibrahim (dismissed) C/o M.R.O. Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. Dismissed as per court order dt 7/1/03. 7. Sri Mahaboob Ali (dismissed) C/o M.R.O. Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. Dismissed as per court order dt 7/1/03. 8. Mahamad Abdul Aziz (dismissed) C/o M.R.O. Rajendranagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist. Dismissed as per court order dt 7/1/03. .....RESPONDENTS (R3 to R8 dismissed for default as per Court order dated 7.1.2003) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent vide D3/13125/81 dated16-11-1994 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the circular instructions vide No.RSC/B/Land/Bom/DISP/LTS/32468/79/1964 dated 6-4-1964 and consequently declare that the petitioners are entitled for allotment of the lands in S.Nos.295, 296 of Poppalaguda (V), Rajendranagar (M), R.R.District to an extent of Ac.11.00, Ac.12.00 respectively. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : O R D E R: The learned counsel for petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J. Dated 16th September 2004 BSB ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Joint Collector, R.R.Dist. Hyderabad. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar (M), Rajendranagar, R.R. Dist. 3. Two CCs to the Government for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. Two CD copies.