IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5926 of 2011 TUNTUN CHAUDHARY & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 33, 41,42 of the Indian Forest Act. The accusation is that the informant intercepted a loaded tractor with stones but subsequently the same was released by assaulting the informant. The accusation against the petitioners is that the informant subsequently came to know that the petitioners are the owners of the said tractor. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that neither tractor was seized nor the stones were recovered nor the seizure list was prepared by the informant. Moreover, it is claimed by the petitioners that there is no tractor in their name nor they are the owners of any 2 tractor. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Tuntun Chaudhary and Guddu Chaudhary, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for three months in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sasaram (M)P.S. Case No. 1043 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned court below will make verification about the petitioners being the owners of any tractor if it is found that the petitioners are not the owners of any tractor then only their provisional bail will be confirmed by the learned court below within two months. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)