INTHEHlGHCOURTOI''eHHATtISGARHA'I'BILASPUR W. P. (Sl N6;'" ^ \ OF 2010. PETITIONER •w ••)?. ^: /v ^^- >S5^ ->.su" l\o^^t"^ ^.^''S^'v^-^ -•"^S'\,>",K,. RESPONBENTS \^. %.^ .V^ Hire Singh Dhruv, aged abput 54 years, Son of Shri DhobaRam Dhruv, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School Amalsa.Sa, Bloek Il@urguliondHl^:;®is c^,KaMffi;r:: :i:Y!-.»i^i|i.^^.).'..:^i..!.o^ ^V:E'.R'S:-US^,;.;;-'':^:,'::;::}^';11:':^ •:1'<.:;):':':';-'":"::;;7;.::' ^^ Sfate (^C^hattisgar^ Througl-i: Ttie Secretary, Tribal Welfare Depart|nient, ^. D.K.S. Bhawan, Reapur (©•m ®|fi^gi'Ehe:3 fsjSSsWWSSs^^a'^^ffyics^S, ' :^w.K.sy{ "!S!iffilM i, •Rsiipur''((3 -3. Assistant Goinraissioner, Kanker, District Kanker ( ^-^l-.; BIoc^ Ectu.cajtion' Qfficsgr, Durgukbndal, Qisfrict Kanlser %..©.)./:.;••:....:;;..^; :'5..;: li'Tl-easury: QfGcer,,';':.,!.,:;1: Treasury Aecbunf & Pensi|on, Kahker,^.I>is1ru;t Kanlcer (<£.;G.) G.) -•©.): Kti: ^"1^if' &Sfli WRIT PETITIOW UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA B' 8-a^ ^ei •^ll*)ld<), ynt'M')'?. r»iwiy^<. 31 ^w^l thHlt) 3iT^?r 'qar% _...U^..^lS^3^i^ •ft^ar' sii^rqH h-ii'h SW^S 3wh7^fft?f SII^T TCIW'Hfl'CT SB : HOM'BLE MR. JUSTICB PSffai|CEiR_B!ffi(AKBR 03,18,8010 Shri Somkant Venna, counsel Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for the Orievance of the petitioner in petitionec was appointed as Assistani Rs. 100 for a period of one year and < was granted regular pay scale of Rs. |br the petitioner. ^tate. |the present petition is that the Teacher on a fixed pay scale of 4fter completion of probation, he 1169-300. Contention of the counsel fc entitled for regular pay scale with appointment and his case is squ. decisions passed by this Court and M.P. State Adininistrative Tribunal, (Madhu&ant Yadu & 36 Othen Vs. it has been held that similarly placed' pay scale from the date of th^ir initia!^ It is not disputed by both the up by the State to theApex Court btjl by the Apex Court upholding the dec^s that the Teachers/Assistant Teach^rs scale from the date of their initial apFJointment Ihe In view of the above submissibn parties, the petition is disposed of in is granted liberty to make a represerjt of the aforesaid judgment and t|h (Annexure P/7) and in tum, the con( consider their case on its own merit <tii<itia4i wvS^ fsc6 <f:*i<4i< iTsiPtnsn^t (r the petitioner is that he is leffect from the date of initial ^rely covered with nuaiber of al^o the judgment rendered by the [Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 $taie ofM.P.& Otfaen) wberein teachers are entitled for regular [appointment. ^arties that the matter was taken the appeal was also dismissed Ision of the Tribunal to the effect are entitled for regular pay made by the counsel for the same terms i.e. the petitioner ;ation, if so advised, in the light le circular dated 27.12.2008 »medrespondent is direoted to and in its perspectiire. If the ^^feFi 1 ^•;^-" -^^ sn^r^ii r'w'h sv^ss sb+ffcb '^rft^ 's^ •^qraRTq, '^ftwre. (««'II'MI< 3Tlit?T TJRRK «l< (Tai1|ch Al^-^l /fc "W( 2( f^^r' 3Ti^T "^TreR ^rf^T petitioner stands on the same footinj Administrate Tribunal in Madhukan confinned by the Supreme Court in 6892/93 by order dated 3.1.1995, same relief accordingly. It is expected from the state after due scrutiny of the facts. as per order passed by the State Yadu (supraj and subsequently |Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. (le petitioner may be entitled to (uthorities to pass suitable order Couft It is made clear that this on merits of the case and the to decide the representation strictly i. has not expreased any opinion authorfty concemed would be at liberty b accordance with law. q)t<ilfi<:fh 'Wi^ff -^ •f^^•<f^^R '^3]f:OT3II^f Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge f^ •^r:j