IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2007 / 10TH ASHADA, 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7727 of 2006() ----------------------------- (NO CRIME) PETITIONERS ----------------------------- 1. V.S. VIDYADARAN, S/O.M.V.SADANANDAN, MADHYARUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNAM P.O., N. PARAVUR-683 520. 2. M.V. SADANANDAN, VADHYARAUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNAM P.O., N. PARAVUR-683 520. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BAIL APPLICATION NO.7727 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JANUARY, 2007 O R D E R Petitioners seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Ernakulam Town North Police are at their heels at the instance of Kodak Mahindra from whom the first petitioner has availed of a loan. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that even though a complaint was received from Kodak Mahindra, no crime has been registered against the petitioner and that the petitioner is not required by the Police in connection with the allegations made in the bail application. If so, the apprehension of arrest and harassment entertained by the petitioner is unfounded. Recording the submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE dsn