1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6692 OF 2010 Suryakant Jyotiram Machave and others. ..PETITIONERS -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. ..RESPONDENTS ......... Mr.S.B. Bhapkar, advocate for petitioners. Mr.D.R. Korade, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 11 st August, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. By way of amendment, the petitioners sought introduction of the prayer regarding ineffectiveness of the order rendered by the Tahsildar. This incidental relief, which can be considered, if so required under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code. For such purpose the amendment is not found necessary. The view taken by the trial Court is proper. No interference is called. The trial Court to examine the permissibility of relief under Order 7 Rule 7 of C.P. Code at the appropriate stage. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp6692.10