@5 Mga7f S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(S) NO. 21557201 1. (IA x 1. Shiv Jagarnath Ram, son of Rameshwar Ram, aged about 34 years, working as Sweeper Naveen High School, Keradih, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. w 2. Been Kumar, son of Laxman Ram, - aged about 25 years, working as PETITIONERS: Sweeper, Naveen High School, Kaliba, Block Kunkuri, Distn‘ct Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, f 3. Rampal Ram, son of Mandhar Ram, aged about 32 years, working as Sweeper, Block Education Office Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versus fc Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, ,D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, /Chhattisgarh. t 4. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Block Education Officer, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Wwm/ 3275...!4moo m m (Wu) mm ma m WWm fa? mm $ aimm SE : Hon’ble Sliri Manindra ohan ShrivastavayJ. 2?—G6-20 1 1 Shri C.J.K. R30, counsel for the petitioners‘ copy . Shri N‘ Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State, on advance V x The petitioners, who were appointed as Part Time $Weeper on a iixed salary of 125.150 have tiled this petition for rection that they are entitled for grant of minimum wages a per minimum wage fixed by the Collector Vide order dated 2. 1 .2010 (Annexure P—Q). i —, the then existing coliector rate, Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the representation has aiso been oved by the petitioners for grant of minimum wages, however, t e same are not being extended to the petitioners. The orders of appointm nt of the petitioners show that they were appointed as Part Time Sweeper vide order dated 3.9.2007 Part Time Sweeper, on colieetorate rates. Therefore, if the collec .orate wages have been-revised,. the case of the petitioners is'also required to be considered for grant of appropriate and existing nimum wages prescribed by the Collector. Accordingly, the petitioners’ case should also be V considered and appropriate o ders in their case should be passed on wages applicable in case e ‘ i W3 XI—HC—78 mm 200 m at m (Wu) ammam my!m W, Rm m Z F Wmzwwm $ 311W m by respondent No.5 for giant of appropriate wages, according to currént rate of wages applica ble to the category of employment, in which the petitioners are employed. With the aforesaid olfservations, the petition is finaiiy diSposed of. 7 f Sd/- 3.7 anindra Mohan Shrivastaya Judge Praveen m ” M