IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:890 of 2001 Between: The Management of Indian Drugs Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Rep By Its Regional Manager Sri Ch. Chandran S/o Ch. V. Rajaram ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Govt Of A.P., Labour Department Rep By Its Dy. Commissioner of Labour (TW) Tangutoori Sramika Anjaiah Bhavan, RTC 'X' Roads, HYDERABAD. 2 The Honble IV Metropolitin Megistrate Criminal Court Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent No.1: AGP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “Under these circumstances, it is just and necessary that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or a Writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus restraining the respondents from enforcing the proceedings No.1914/99 CLP 3691/99 dt:7.7.99 issued under section 33 (c) and sub section (1) of 33C(1) of the industrial disputes Act, 1947 and its consequential proceedings.” On 06.09.2008, when the case was called, there was no representation for the petitioner and, therefore, the writ petition was adjourned for today to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, interim order, dated 24.01.2001 is vacated and WPMP.No.1060 of 2001 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 8th SEPTEMBER, 2008. kvni