HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGAmi AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENT8 WR1T PETITION (C) ^to. 5032 of2007 Madan Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Shri Rewa Ram Shanna, Aged about 60 years, R/'o Village Karanja Bhilai Tehsil & District Dsa-g. CUiattisgarh. VERSUS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Depat'tnieiit of School Education, D.K.S. ^A. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G. 'Tiie Colleetor, District Durg, C.G. 3. Block Education Officer, Durg, District Durg, f^ r\ i-.U. 4. State Bank of India Through the Manaser Main Braiich, Gaiijpara Durg, District Durg, C.G. 5. The Branch Manager, State Baiik of India, Caiap Area Biiilai, Disti'ict Durg, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUngN QFjNDIA, SB: Hon'bte Shri Satlsh K. Asmhotri. J. Present: Shri Jitendra Guota. -Advocate fbr the oetitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondeats 1 to 3. 4. (Passedon 20thdayof August, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this oetition wifh libertv to make representation to the Govemment aufhorities as the petitioner, beine a Govennnent employee, is getting salarv from the Govemment and not from fhe Bank, to which fhe leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 has no obiection. It is ordered accordingly. The eoncemed State authorities are directed to coiisider and decide the representation, if any, filed by fhe petitioner. in accordance with law, on its own merit, expeditiously, preferably within a period of Ibur weeks •K" •* fromthe date ofreceipt ofrepresentation.'* < ' In view ofthe above, the petitioh stands disposed of. r~ sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn ! Judge Amit / -^