IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19605 of 2011 UPENDRA RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 2 11-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is agnate of the informant and it is admitted position in the first information report that land dispute was going on between the deceased and the petitioner since long. Although there is allegation that the petitioner and other accused administered poison to the deceased and in course of investigation, one witness namely, Rajeev Kumar stated that poison was administered in rice and some witnesses supported the aforesaid fact but learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drew my attention towards Annexure-2 to this petition which is postmortem report of the deceased and submitted that no food particle was found in the stomach of the deceased at the time of postmortem examination. It is further pointed out by him that in course of investigation, some witnesses stated that the deceased committed suicide consuming poison. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Upendra Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail - 2 - bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 293 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)