^ biNir APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFFS HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SECOND APPEAL N0. 336/2011 l/ Anandi D/o Late Bargu aged about 64 years, 2/ Devan S/o Late Bargu aged about 60 years. 3/ Bansh Ram S/o Late Bargu aged about 57 years. 4/ BasantS/o Late Bargu aged about 54 years. Appellants No. 1 to 4 R/o Village Chainpur P.8. Jhilmili earlier Tahsil Surajpur but recently Tahsil Bahiyathan, District Sarguja (C.G.). Beegan S/o late Chhaua aged.about 57 years, R/o Villiage Chainpur P.S. Jhilmili earlier Tahsil Surajpur but recently Tahsil Bahiyathan, District Sarguja (C.G.). 2/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Collector District Sarguj'a (C.G.). 3/ Fenku Ram S/o late Balram aged about 49 years, R/o Village Chainpur P.S. Jhilmili earlier Tahsil Surajpur but recently Tahsil -Bahiyathan District Sarguja (C.G.). RESPONDENT/ Defendants VERSUS l/ SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTLON 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present : Shri Suresh Pandey, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L..for the State/respondent No. 2. Respondents No. 1 & 3 not noticed. JUDGEMENT (Passedon 21/11/2011) 1. By this second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 appellants have challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 27/9/2011 passed by First Additional District Judge/^Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No. 49-A/2011 affirming the judgment and decree of dismissal of suit dated 7/8/2009 passed by Second Civil Judge Class-2 Surajpur, Surguja (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 89-A/2008 whereby suit for amendment in Vyavasthapatra/csince\\Sition of Vyavasthapatra (family-arrangement deed) has been dismissed. —a^- ^ i s^" 2. Shri Suresh Pandey, Advocate for the appellants and Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 2 are heard. 3. Both the judgment and decree impugned perused. 4. Right may be created on the basis of partition, succession or execution by lawful manner. Arrangement deed is only temporary arrangement of the property between persons having right over the property. Arrangement deed does not give any right or title to any person therefore; any amendment or cancellation of such deed would be superficial claim by the parties. Parties may file suit for declaration or partition or declaration of the rights on the basis of partition but parties had not filed such suit. Consequently, by dismissing the suit & appeal, both the Courts below have not committed any illegality requiring any interference in second appeal, I do not find any substance or substantial question of law in present second appeal. Consequently, second appeal is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. 5. Ihterini application is also dismissed. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^ ^