1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk WRIT PETITION NO. 3257 OF 2009 M/s. Mehra Sons & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. Wockhardt Limited ..Respondents. .... Mrs. Anu R. Khanna, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Subodh Desai, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 29TH JUNE, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2 The Petition is filed by the original accused who had in response to the notice issued under section 294 of the Criminal Procedure Code, admitted documents, particularly three cheques. However, when the witness of the complainant was under cross- examination certain questions were tried to be put as to who had written those cheques, in what sequence those cheques were written etc. Those questions were not allowed by the trial court on the ground that the documents were already admitted. That order 2 was challenged by the accused in Revision Application No. 68 of 2008 which came to be dismissed by the Sessions Court holding that the impugned order is purely interlocutory. 3 In view of the facts noted above, it is clear that it is purely an interlocutory order refusing such questions in the cross- examination and that too because the documents were already admitted under section 294 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore, I see no reason to interfere in the impugned order. 4 Therefore, Petition stands dismissed. [ J.H. BHATIA, J. ]