(p t> BEFORE HQN^LE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) Nd'^-2'^2^/2011 PETITIONER (In Jail) -^\-^^. ^yy ^<;>^:^'F-U"' ...- ^yy^^ .^y..^ ^ 5^;-^ Virendra Sinha, S/o Babulal Sinha, aged about 25 years, Through His 'ather Babulal Sinha S/o Late Ramtalhu Sinha Aged about 54 years R/o Village Bhanwarmara, Police Station Lalbagh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ; 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Superintendent of Police, Kabirdham, District-Kabirdham (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDE R ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Brf. HIGH COURT OF GHHATnSGARM AI-BUJ^RUR^ f- ,.:.::.:*•:». (Hon. Mr JusticePritinker Dhwaker) » PeUtjoner Respondent W.P.S.No. 7272 of 2011 Virendra Slnha VERSUS Stete < of <Ghhattisgarh< and anotrter ; » ^ Presenti ShriAnupMazumdar,CQuns^fcir{}etffiOiiier; ShriN.NahaRoy,PLft)rtheState.^ OREyER (02.12.^011) ..i:'. ?sit., Leamed counsel fbr the petitionep while fcseekir^ permission for withdrawal of this petition fairiy submitssthata againstthe jmpugnedorderdated 24.08.201'l.thep^itionepl'Kis already preferred an appeal before the Inspector ©eneraloft Police and the purpose of filing this petition would be served ita direetion is issued to the Inspector General of Police for deeldtag thependingappealofthepetitioner. - » $ 2. Learned Statecounselsubmitsthatthepetitionertias not fited any document shewing that he hasfiled-an appeal before the InspectorGeneral of Police. However, if he has preferrettany^ such appeat and the same is pending, It would be-decided in aecordance with law. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as*w hdrawn wttte« afbresafd liberty. If the petitioner hse preferred any^appeai befbre the Inspector General of Poltce and the samesls (»nd8ig, it is expected from the competent authority to deG|de»the said? appeal in accordancewith lawas expedBiously asposable. s y 4. tt is made clear that this Court has r»texp-essed any < opinionon the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at llberty to decide the representation strtetty i^ accordance wlth law — - pr,rinkCTDiwakar Judge