:: 1 :: W.P. NOS.11306/2010, 11307/2010 & 11308/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11306 OF 2010 Subhash Zambarsing Girase ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri N.N. Desale, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 Shri Amol S. Sawant, Advocate for respondent No.4. Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.6. ..... W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.11307 OF 2010 Digambar Jagdish Nikam ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri D.B. Thoke, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 Shri Amol S. Sawant, Advocate for respondent No.5. Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.9. ..... W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.11308 OF 2010 Raghuvir Bajirao Bagal ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri P.S. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 :: 2 :: W.P. NOS.11306/2010, 11307/2010 & 11308/2010 Shri Amol S. Sawant, Advocate for respondent No.5. Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.13. ..... CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : 22nd December, 2010 PER COURT : 1. The petitioners take exception to the order dated 12.11.2010, whereby the respondent No.2 District Collector & Election Officer, has rejected the applications/ objections dated 18.10.2010, filed by the petitioners. 2. The controversy in this petition is in respect of elections to the District Central Cooperative Bank of Dhule and Nandurbar, which is a specified society, and finalisation of voters list. 3. Mr. Amol S. Sawant, learned counsel for the respondent Bank states that the process of election has already commenced and the last date of filing nomination forms was 20.12.2010. It is noticed that the impugned order is dated 12.11.2010. However, the petitioners have approached this Court only on 13.12.2010. In another matter pertaining to the very elections of the said Society, it is noticed that, the Division Bench of this Court, by an order dated 20.12.2010 in Writ Petition No. 10562/2010, did not entertain the petition in view of the alternate remedy available under the law after completion of the process of the election :: 3 :: W.P. NOS.11306/2010, 11307/2010 & 11308/2010 and the petition was, therefore, allowed to be withdrawn. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain the petitions. The petitioners may avail of the alternate remedy available in law after completion of the process of election, if they so desire. Writ Petitions are dismissed with no order as to costs. A. A. SAYED JUDGE fmp/wp11306.10