IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2071 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 22, 2008 Balwinder Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Lakhbir Singh & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. B.S. Bajwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Kahlon, Advocate, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition is directed against order dated 1.9.2008. The petitioner had filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. It has been brought out that Dr. Gurpal Singh had been examined. The said doctor had prepared medico legal report and X-Ray report of the injured. Although medico legal report has been exhibited, however, inadvertently, X-Ray report could not be exhibited. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that the case is at the stage of defence evidence and therefore, the application is opposed. I have considered the issue. Crl. Misc. No. M-2071 of 2008 [2] There can be no doubt that the X-Ray report would be a relevant piece of evidence to consider the extent and nature of injury. Medico legal report without X-Ray report would be incomplete. Interest of justice therefore requires that X-Ray report be allowed to be placed on record. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 1.9.2008 is hereby set aside. The application filed on behalf of the petitioner’s side under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is allowed. The petitioner would be given one opportunity to lead evidence. (AJAI LAMBA) December 22, 2008 JUDGE avin