COCP No. 2216 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2216 of 2009 Date of decision:- 25.8.2010 Bhupinder Singh ......petitioner vs. Hargunjit Kaur, PCS and others ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K.K.Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. R. S.Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Mr. Manohar Lal, Advocate for respondent No. 3 HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) The grievance of the petitioner is that he was found to be highest bidder in proceedings before this Court challenging the auction conducted at the instance of Punjab National Bank claiming amount due from Swastik Khadi Gram Udyog Smiti. The sale in his favour has been confirmed but still, the title deeds of the property purchased have not been given to him and such action is in violation of the orders passed by this Court. This Court on 5.8.2009, directed the Estate Officer, Chandigarh to issue No Objection Certificate to the purchaser Sh. Bhupinder Singh. The statement of the learned counsel for Bank before this Court was that on receipt of the amount, the Bank shall pay an amount of Rs. 38,00,000/- to the petitioner i.e. Khadi and Village Industries Commission- second charge holder. In pursuance of such order, the Estate Officer has issued No Objection Certificate and also effected transfer in its record. The subsisting grievance of the petitioner is that the Bank is not returning the title deeds of the property taken in possession by the Bank. In reply, on behalf of respondent No. 2 has stated that the original COCP No. 2216 of 2009 -2- lease deed, letter of allotment and the possession letter are not available with the Bank as the same were deposited by the borrower mortgagor with the Khadi Village and Industries Commission. In view of the fact that the documents are said to be not available with the Bank, therefore, no further action is necessary or required in the present petition. The same is dismissed. It shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to his remedy as may be available to him in accordance with law. Dismissed with aforesaid liberty. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 25.8.2010 preeti