?^-% e^<:^>?^^ ^ ^ HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPITR Writ Petition No. 369 of2(M)S PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Saliu Soukhilal Tiwari S/o Slirimws Tiwari, aged about 33 years^ village Mouhariya, PO, Belwabadgaiyan Distt. Rewa (MP). VERSUS 1. South Eastem Coalfields Limited, Tlirougli - Chaimian-cum- Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Cliliattisgarh. 2. The Director (P), South Eastem Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur Cliliattisgarh. 3. Tlie Chief General Manage^ South Eastemm Coalfields Lmiited, Sohagpur Ajlea, PO: Dhanpiiri, Distt. Shahdol (MP). 4. Shri Susliil Kumar Rao S/o Sakal Deep Rao, Cat I General Mazdoor C/o Generai Manager, SECL, Johila Area, PO Nowrozabad Colliery, Distt. Umaria (MP). 5. Sliri Jugal Kishore S/o Harmaiidasi, Cat I General Mazdoor, C/b General Manager, SECL, Johila A'ea, PO Nowrozabad Colliery, Distt. Umaria (MP). (WRIT PETmON LJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE, CONSTTTTjnON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Me Mr. Satisli K. Agiiiliotri^y Preserit : Sliri Goverdhan Yadav, Advocate for the petitioiier. Shri Praveesi Das, Advocate for the respondent No> 1 & 2> ORALORDER (Passed on 19th ofFebi-uar^7,2008) Leamed comisel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the case ofthe petitioner is smiilarly situated to that ofthe respondents iii the matter of Chamnan, Central Coalfields Ltd & others Vs. Jivenclra Prasad Ti^ari & others (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Leamed coimsel farther submits that the said Civil Appeal has been disposed ofvide order dated 29th March, 2007, passed by the Honl^lc Supreme Court of India. He flirther submits that this case may ako be disposed ofiii the same temis. In view ofthe above, the petition stands disposed of m the same terms. No order asto costs. ____— ——^— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge