IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P No.1028 OF 2009 23.09.2010 Between: Nirmala and another .... Petitioners And: G. Leelavathi and another ....Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P No.1028 OF 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 06.01.2009 in IA No.738 of 2008 in O.S.No.738 of 2008 on the file of V Additional Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner/defendants filed an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 C.P.C for appointment of a Commissioner to localise the suit property. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Commissioner has not considered the work memo given by them and as such it is necessary to measure the total extent of the schedule property taking into consideration of the sale deed under Ex.A-1 and to note down the specific measurements as per work memo. Heard both sides. Perused the material available on record. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, it is open to the petitioner to substantiate any aspect by leading evidence and the same can be appreciated at the time of final disposal. It is also left open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps at appropriate time. There are no merits in the revision. Hence, the civil revision petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly the same is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J Date:23.09.2010. Gk. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P No.1028 OF 2009 DATE:23.09.2010. Gk.