IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14139 of 2008 BACCHA NUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 2.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and A.P.P. representing the State. In view of the fact that the petitioner is an accused for an offence under Section 395 & 412 of the Indian Penal Code and that there is an allegation of recovery of certain stolen articles in view of the confessional statement of the petitioner as recorded in the impugned order and that the petitioner has remained in custody only for a period of one year (from 3.2.2007), this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner namely Baccha Nut is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner is given liberty to move before this Court for bail after completing one and a half years of his judicial custody. With the aforementioned observations/directions, this application for bail is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)