1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.152 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1922 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5201 OF 2009 Kamal V. Zalte ...Petitioner. v. The General Manager and Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.R.P.Saxena, adv. for petitioner/review applicant. Mr. Suresh Kumar with Mr.T.J.Pandian, advs. For the Respondents. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 27th January , 2010. P.C. 1 Review applicant/petitioner sought review of the order of this Court dated August 7, 2009. By that order at interim stage, this Court directed that the provisional pension of the petitioner/review applicant be calculated taking into consideration the service rendered by the petitioner/review applicant and thereafter complete regular service by the petitioner/review applicant. Pursuant to that, respondents have considered petitioner/review applicant’s service and accordingly, have directed payment of provisional pension. 2 2 In the case of the review application, judgments cited would not be applicable to petitioner/review applicant as service of petitioner/review applicant has been counted. This Court has only passed interim order. All the contentions of the parties will be open for consideration at the final stage. In the light of that, in our opinion, no case for review is made out. 3 Application for review stands rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)