IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2011 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 12425 of 2011(C) --------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- SUNIL SIVADASAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN DREDGING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, FLAT NO.905, PIONEER TOWERS, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 031. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNUR - 670 001. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THALASSERY - 679 532. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THALASSERY - 679 532. 4. SRI.MOHAMMED HAJI, M.P.K.MANZIL, EDAYANNUR PO, KANNUR - 670 595. 5. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,TRIVANDRUM - 695 001 6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,THALAYIL FISHING HARBOUR, THALAYI PO, THALASSERY - 679 532. R1 TO R3, R5 & R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. C.M. CHARISMA R4 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 12425 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE INVOICE DATED 15.9.2010. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE BILL OF ENTRY DATED 4.10.2010. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 17.4.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R4(a) : COPY OF THE SELECTION NOTICE DATED 21.1.2011. EXT.R4(b) : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE AGREEMENT. EXT.R4(c) : COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 30.4.2011. EXT.R4(d) : COPY OF THE COMMISSION APPLICATION DATED 30.4.2011. EXT.R4(e) : COPY OF APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ATTACHMENT DATED 30.4.2011. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.12425 of 2011-C ***************************** Dated this the 24th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. File shows that the same was the situation when the matter came up for hearing on 17.05.2011. A counsel appears for the 4th respondent. Inference appears to be irresistible that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition now. 2. This Writ Petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed for non prosecution. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/