$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16258/2006 SAMBHAVANA ..... Petitioner Through: None versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Saurabh Banerjee & Mr. Bikram Singh, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-6 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Mr.Hardik Rupal & Ms. Aditi Shastri, Advs. for Ambedkar University Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. with Ms.Vipasha Mishra, Adv. for R-13 Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv. for R-23 & 81 Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia & Mr. Mohit Bangwal, Advs. for R-19, 25, 43, 44, 63, 64, 75 & 76 Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC with Mr. Zahid Hanief & Ms. Manisha Chauhan, Advs. for GNCTD Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Adv. for R-3, 11, 22 & 30 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R % 30.09.2019 CM No.11400/2012 When the matter is called out, nobody appears for the applicant. W.P.(C) 16258/2006 page 1 of 2 Having heard the counsel for the respondents and looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that W.P.(C)16258/2006 has already been disposed of vide order dated 17.12.2009. Hence, no further order can be passed in this disposed of writ petition. If any review application is to be preferred, it can be preferred by this applicant otherwise application in a disposed of matter is not admissible in law. Hence, reserving liberty with this applicant to file a review application, if any, in accordance with law, this application is hereby dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2019/ns W.P.(C) 16258/2006 page 2 of 2