IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 CRP.No. 363 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 03/03/2008 IN IA.109/2005 IN OS.8/1998 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONERS: RESPONDENTS ----------------------------- 1. KALLYANI AMMA, D/O.SREEDEVI AMMA. 2. KUNHIKANNAN, S/O.KALLYANI AMMA. 3. MOHANAN, S/O.KALLYANI AMMA. (ALL ARE RESIDING AT KOOHANGADAN KIZHAKKEVEEDU, KADANNAPPALLI VILLAGE). BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENT: APPELLANT ----------------------- KAMALAKSHI AMMA, D/O.LATE KANNAN NAMBIAR, KOONHANGUDAN VIZHAKKEVEEDU, KADANNAPPALLI VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT RAVANISWARAM, KASARAGOD. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 363 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008 ORDER This civil revision petition is preferred against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Payyannur, in IA 109/05 in OS 8/98. It was an order of amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC whereby the plaintiff has been permitted to incorporate the relief of mandatory injunction. The court below found that the amendments sought for will not change the character of the suit. However, the relief of mandatory injunction is a prayer against the act that would have arisen after the institution of the suit. I do not find any ground to interfere with the said order. The defendants can certainly file their additional written statement against the averments in the plaint. Therefore, with liberty to file additional written statement, this civil revision petition is disposed of. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps