6 C P/CZ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. H'&^ Of 2007 PETITIONER "a Agrawal S/p-fcate Shri Banwari Lal Agrawal, aged about 43^years, resident of BUaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh , District Raipur (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS •"y^ l'<!t' .>'' ^'y^ ^r- C3' /^kThe State of Chhattisgarh, through the Principal Secretaiy, ^cr' Agriculture Department, ^f^ Mantralay, D.K.S. BuUding , (^ ^. Raipur(CG). yi^The Election Officer, Mandi Election, Bilaigarh Tahsil Bilaigarh , District Raipur (GC). ^The Presiding Officer/Competent Mandi Election Bilaigarh, Electoral ConstituencyNo. 128 Bhattgaon Mandi-08, Tashil Bilaigarh .District Raipur (CG). ^ Shri Durga Prasad Singhaniya ^ S/o Shri Prabhati Lal Singhaniya , R/o Village and Post and Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). f. Shri Arun Kumar Sahu S/o Keju Rain Sahu, resident of Village Pawani,Tahsil Bilaigarh, district Raipur (CG). K"Shri Anil Kuinar Kediya, S/o Shi:i Kashi Prasad Kediya, resident of Village and Post Sarsiwan, Tahsil Bilaigarh, /District Raipur(CG). '/.The Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Bhattgaon, District Raipur (CG). r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A». -HC-22 SfV^'W h-fl4i 3V^S sti*l1^> ^t(?ft 'vr Tumane 'TSi -tlllll<rl'sl, yfll'H'is, faoi-yy 'qsra; /(r;^,i?)-g3,/2^9- frm^K^v^-^---------^--^ aw 3ii^r?%iWHf5^ SB : Hon'ble Shn ManjndraMQhan IShrivastava. J. 03-02^011 No.1- Shri Shailendra Dubey, couns^l for the petitioner. Shri Aj'ay Dwivedi, Deputy Go'|rt. Advocate for the State/respondent Shri Pawan Kesharwani, coun^et for pespondents' No. 2, 3 & 7. Shri Rakesh Pandey, counsel None for other respondents. 1-teard. This petition has been filed by By the said order, election of elected on 24-01-2006 and in view Act, 1972, the tenure of five years w the petition. Under these cireumstances, academic as no reliefcould be grant^dtothe petitioner. Accorciingly, the |»titjon is rendered infructuous. <*l<<i<?t'fl-) ^HcS^^S <fatdl< '^.MpOTan^l ^r respondent No.4. the petitioner against the order dated 03-02-2007 (Annexure P-8), by whic|i, etection of the petitioner has been set aside t^ the Election Tribunal. he petitioner was set aside and in his • place, upon re-count, respondent No.|4 was declared elected. From the records, it is reve^ted that the petitioner was declared of the provisions contained jn Mandi ijch is expired during the pendency of he issue in this petition is rendered nally disposed off as having been ,:' Sd/- MamndraMohanShriva^ava Judge i- fTfr^ •5'feA