1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6371 of 2009. Mohammad Naeem son of Shri Mohammad Yasin VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Another Date of Order ::: 22/05/2009. Hon'ble Mr. Mohammad Rafiq, J. Mr. Amardeep Atwal and Mr. Prakash Thakuria, Counsel for the Petitioner By the Court : The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have illegally invited fresh tender on 24th April, 2009, wherein contract earlier awarded to the petitioner was cancelled vide notice dated 01.05.2009. The petitioner has submitted that the respondents be directed to accept the 3/4th amount of the previous tender, which the petitioner could not timely deposit and is now will to pay with interest. 2 The petitioner was earlier awarded contract and deposited 1/4th amount on 30.01.2009, whereas the total lease amount was Rs.24,10,240/-. Petitioner submitted an application to extend the time to deposit the amount by 15-days. When the Court was not persuaded to issue writ of mandamus directed the respondents to extend the time limit for deposit of remaining 3/4th of lease amount, at the stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be given a liberty to participate in the fresh invited tender. The respondents have debarred the petitioner from participating in auction tender for a period of two years and have also forfeited his security amount and 1/4th amount. The petitioner may, therefore, make a representation to the respondents, which they may consider and decide in accordance with the law. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Mohammad Raifq) J. ashok/ Certificate - All corrections have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. Ashok Kumar Songara/P.A.cum J.W.