IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR, Writ Petition (Sl No. 7 7^ of 2008 © PETITIONER : ^<sv<^ >/?:>?'...' ^^....-^-":...-"' ^^y ^^^ fe^- ^. ^••'^?'- ^.•>' ^ ^*" <.c?" ^ ^. ^ RISPONDBNTS : ^5^ it?t5?% .•.^5f^' '^-aTi, %?^^f/ ^'^^? >ool Ahmed, S/o Chand Mohmmed, aged about 55 years, Presently posted and working as Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). Under Secretary, Department of Urban Administration 8& Development, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). Commissioner, Urban Administration Development, Directorate Raipur, Raipur (CG). & at WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WMT OF_iJKE NATURB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Slnale Bench : Hon'bie Mr Justice Pritinker Diwaker PETITIONER Writ Petition (S) No. 775 of2008 Maqbooi Ahmed RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisaarh & others. iVir. Varunendra Mishra, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jaln, PaneS Lawyer for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTSTUTiON OF INDIA g^_D^E (07.07.2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finaily. Challenae in the instant writ petltion is to the order dated 23.1.2008 (Annexure-P-1) passed by the State Government whereby the petjtioner was transferred from the post of Chief Municipal Offlcer, Nagar Panchayat; Sitapur, Dlstrict Sarauja to the Nagar Panchayat; Gharghoda, District Raigarh; in violatlon of the transfer poijcy. Thls Court entertaining the grievance ofthe pet'rtioner had granted stay in his favour vide order dated 27.2.2008- In view of the fact that this petition was filed on 4.2-2008 and stay was also granted in favour of the petitioner. the transfer order, so far as it reiates to the petitioner Is hereby quashed. However, the State Government would be at iiberty to pass an order if the administrative exlgency so warrant With the above observation, the petitlon stands disposed of. Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge ^s ^A