IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20828 of 2011 Date of Decision:19.07.2011 Ramesh Singh @ Harmesh Singh . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.L.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) . This is a case where the allegation against the petitioner is under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he had purchased the motorcycle from the co-accused, who has been arrested and released on bail. Learned counsel for the State has, however, submitted that it was new motorcycle which is alleged to have been purchased by the petitioner for a sum of `28,000/- though the motorcycle was costing much more. Since the petitioner does not want to press this petition at this stage and only prays for considering his bail application by the trial Court at the time of his surrender on the same day, therefore, present petition is dismissed as not pressed and learned trial Court is directed to decide the bail application if filed by the petitioner on the day he surrenders before it, in accordance with law. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 19, 2011 JUDGE vivek