ficlo/OL— C3 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P5No. i£)£§§[200§— (3.3.) VA/shviny Kumar Pandey PETITIONER IW S/o Shri Muked Prasad Pan$ey, aged about 43 years, R/o Kargikala Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretaly , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) f2. Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) f, RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘W. P. (5) No. 1089 of 2007 ?e+i'i'ioner : Ashviny Kumar Pandey Versus §esp0ndznfs Sfa'fe of Chhaf‘i’isgarh & ana‘fher ’4 g Siagh Bench: Ham’ble Mr. Ju$fice Safish K. Agniha'i'ri. Mr. Kumar'esh Tiwari, Advocate for The petitioner. 5min A‘nju Ahuja, Depirfy Gavernmen‘i’ Advoca‘fe for +he Sate/respendenfs. ORDER (Passed on Wis 26"“ Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appeariiig for The pe‘i’ii'ioner submi‘i‘s ‘i’ha‘i’ 'i'he pe+i%ior1er* is working a§ Assiswm' Teacher/Leewwr. The pe‘fi'fiorier ob'rained B. Ee‘. Examina'fion cerfif-ica‘i’e mi 14-7-1992, on his own expeflsgs. Learned coUi’Isei appearing fer =H'Ie pe'ii’i'iorier submh‘s Tha‘i‘ ‘i'he ques'i‘ion iavoived, herein aS‘m whether The ‘i’eacher, who cbfained 3. Ea. Examinai'ion Cernfica'fe on his own expenees is enfi‘i'led To two advance ineremen‘fs. According 1’0 iearneé counsei for ilne pe‘i’ii'ioner, fne pe‘i‘i'i’ioner is en‘i'i'iied 1'0 ’i'w’o advance incremen'fs in View of fhe decision 0% fhis Cour-i in ihe case of Yashwan: iiuinar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, burg and anoi'her' {2006 (ZEI) MPJ’R-CG 96}. This Court in fine case of Yashwan'i' Kumar Bhai‘adwaj Vs. Municipai Corporaiion, ‘Durg and ano‘i’her (5upra), came 'i'o 'fhe conclusion ‘ihai ihe 'ieaohers, who had ob‘i’ained S. Ed. /8.T.T. Examination Ceriificafe on Their own k3 expenses, are coverea‘ by 'the circular dafed 24.12.98 issued by The 51‘a‘i'e Governmem of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsei far 'i’he pe‘ri‘l‘ioner fur'i’her submifs +ha1' +he fads and quesi’ion of iaw irwolved in fhe presenf case are squareiy covered by decision of ‘i’his Cour-1‘ in The case of Yashwan'l' Kurnar Bhomdwaj Vs. oiunicipai Corporaiion, Durg and ano'fher (Supra), ‘i’o which ieamed counsei appearing for The respondems fairly concedes and agrees wi‘ih The avermen'r made by learned counsei appearing for +he pefiTioner. 5. Accordingiy‘, fine wrif pe'ri'rion is ailowed in derms of fhe order passed in fhe case of Yashwan‘t Kumar- Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corpora‘non, Dung and ano+her (Supra), subject +0 verifica'i’ion of 'l'he fac‘i as do whe‘i'her The peTiTioner has acquired B. Ed; ExaminaTion CerTificaTe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 & 13.1999 and furT’ner wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs. l l ‘ l Satish K. Agnihatri l l Sd/- Judge 5ubhash