IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) No.655 of 2009 Chandrashekhar Madhukar Karnik ..Petitioner ..Petitioner ..Petitioner. vs. vs. vs. The Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors ..Respondents. Respondents. Respondents. Mr K. V. Tembe for the Petitioner. Ms A.R.Joshi for the B.M.C. Mr Patil Gangarkar i/b Patil Gangarkar & Co for Respondent No.3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 13TH APRIL,2009. DATED : 13TH APRIL,2009. DATED : 13TH APRIL,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the B.M.C. states that hearing will be given to the petitioner and the B.M.C. will not give effect to the impugned notice in the meanwhile. In view of the statement made, the writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of, accordingly. 2. The B.M.C. would pass appropriate order after giving opportunity to the petitioner of being heard. If, the order is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, the B.M.C. will not give effect to the same for the period of two weeks, thereafter. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.