IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37773 of 2008 RANJEET KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 7.1.2009 Heard Mr. Satish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The allegation against the petitioner is that he indecently behaved with the mother of the informant. That behaviour was very serious. The lady dealt a lota blow to the petitioner upon which the petitioner is said to have pierced knife in her abdomen. The injury was found on the umbilical area 1 ½” x 1” x depth not assessed. The patient was referred to Patna Medical College and Hospital. Learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in his rejection order that the injury was grievous and that appears also from the description of the injury which is copied in paragraph-32 of the case diary. The Court required the final opinion of the doctor in connection with the injury to be made available to it but that has not been received. It appears that Superintendent of Police, Saharsa, could not probably understand as to what was required by this Court and simply appears ignoring the requirement of the Court by pointing out that injury report was copied at paragraph- 32 of the case diary. The Court does not appreciate the manner in which the Superintendent of Police, Saharsa, rebuffed the direction of this Court. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, - 2 - the allegation and the connecting injury, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )