IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.444 of 2010 BALESHWAR SAH SON OF DHURANDHAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GODHIYA CHAMAN, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR, BIHAR 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLIC, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 6. THE SUB-INSPECTOR-CUM-INVESTIGATING OFFICER, BHAGWANPUR POLICE STATION, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ----------- 3 06.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner was for tracing out the victim boy who was traceless at the material time, however, it is submitted that the victim boy has been traced out and has been handed over to the informant. The further grievance of the petitioner is that the Investigating Officer is not taking the victim boy for recording his statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the State submits that the Investigating Officer is acting as per law, however, it will be open for the petitioner to take remedial actions as provided under different provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the above circumstances, in case petitioner has got any grievance against the Investigating Officer, it will be open for him to bring it to the notice of the concerned Superintendent of Police for necessary directions including the directing for getting the statement of the victim boy recorded under section 164 Cr. P.C. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)