1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.303 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.390 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.303 OF 2010 Ramesh Kalidas Tikam Plaintiff versus Vikas Kalidas Tikam and others Defendants Mr.G.B.Kedia for plaintiff. Mr.Ajay Mishra for defendant no.1. Ms.Bhagyashree Prashant Shanbag, defendant no.3 and Ms.Rachana Ramesh Prabhu, defendant no.4 present in person. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 27th July 2011 PC : 1. Learned advocate appearing for the plaintiff informs the Court that he is not pressing the suit against defendant no.2. 2. In view thereof, the suit against defendant no.2 is dismissed as not pressed. The learned advocates appearing for the plaintiff and the defendant no.1 and the defendant nos.3 and 4 who are appearing in person, now tender consent terms dated 27th July 2011. They submit that the consent terms be taken on record and the suit be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. The consent terms are signed by the plaintiff and defendant nos.1, 3 and 4. The consent terms are also signed by the 2 advocate for the plaintiff and advocate for the defendant no.1. The defendant no.1 as well as the defendant nos.3 and 4 have informed this Court in Marathi as to what are the actual contents of the consent terms. They have also informed the Court that they have signed the consent terms on their own free will and volition. The suit is therefore disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked `X'. Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules. Notice of Motion No.390 of 2010 also stands disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)