IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23621 of 2009 BIRENDRA NUT son of Mofil Nut resident of village Paraskhan P.S. Jalalpur, Dist.Saran at Chapra …….Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not name in the first information report and no recovery was made from him. However, in the light of the facts recorded in the order of the learned Sessions Judge a query was made from the learned counsel regarding criminal antecedent of the petitioner and he has stated that his instruction is that there are four cases all under section 395 of the I.P.C. against the petitioner from before. Considering the fact that this is the fifth case under section 395 of the I.P.C. against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the court below shall expedite the trial of the case. (J.N. Singh, J) M.Rahman