THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6624 of 2006 ORDER: Petitioner filed I.A.No.340 of 2006 in F.C.O.P.No.241 of 2005, before the learned Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 226 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte order in O.P.No.241 of 2005. The Court below dismissed the said I.A. through its order, dated 18.11.2006, which has been assailed in the present Civil Revision Petition. The case of the petitioner is that he was in London and busy with profession, therefore, he could not pursue the matter, as such, subsequent to the ex parte decree passed on 22.09.2005 in O.P.No.241 of 2005, his brother filed I.A.No.811 of 2005 on his behalf on 17.10.2005 but the same was dismissed. In the circumstances, it can be said that the order, dated 22.09.2005, in the O.P. has become final. Therefore, the present application is totally not maintainable nor any indulgence can be shown in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner is unable to explain as to why he has not carried further by way of revision or otherwise assailing the order, dated 17.10.2005. In view of the same, I do not find any justification or merit to entertain the subsequent application or to show any indulgence. There are no merits in the Civil Revision Petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, ACJ 18th NOVEMBER, 2010. kvni