IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 11387 of 2011(W) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- M.REMESH KUMAR, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682018. BY ADVS. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RANGE, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 11387/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE D.P.C. HELD ON 26/03/2011 FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE SELECT LIST FOR PROMOTION AS DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENTS OF POLICE. P2: COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES DATED 22/07/2009 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27/01/2010 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.11387 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition complaining that although disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner have been concluded the petitioner has not been included in the select list for promotion. Today the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order on 08.04.2011 the petitioner has already been promoted. In the above circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition and the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order which reads thus: “If the disciplinary proceedings have already been concluded and the petitioner has been exonerated as claimed by the petitioner, the petitioner shall be given the benefit of promotion in accordance with the select list, notwithstanding the endorsement made in the select list.” Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/