@~ Hi^<ni ss»*<sch 'T^ ^S^(<n^, ^Tll^ilfo, l^cll<H4,< CTte.--^^-^Q---^200_3 3Tf^i <q?w (^i^<^) ^Rl^T^N^ ^w ^yii^T^iw T^nw ^ft?f 3?i^T Sinole Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P^o.7^0/2009 (Petition U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) Petitioner Smt. AnJ< Aged Teacher, Surki, bistt. Nagar, La| Distt. |ali Verma, W/o Tikaram Verma, ab}out 39 years, Upper bivision |Government Middle School, Village Pojst-Bijradih, Vikaskhand-Bhatapara, Railpur- (C.G.), R/o Near Canal, Baghel Bahadur Shastri Ward, Bhatapara, Raitiur (CG) Poist Vs RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. State Secreta^y MantralA^ The biril Governmier The Dis| (C.G.) 06.2.2009 Mr. beepak Jain, Advocate for Mr. Ajay bwivedi, by. Govt| Heard. The petitioner, who was ihitial'y appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher in the Schpoi Education Department of the State ^overnment, is aggr ^N^pfh ^i^dT^ t^^ T$^:gH ^3?Rm3TF^T |of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Department of Education, \ya. &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (.C.G.) ^ctor Publiclnstruction, Chhattisgarh |ent Raipur, bistt. Raipur (C.G.) 1-rict Education Officer, Distt. Raipur the petitioner. Advocate for the State. ieved by the action of the respondents in not adding twojadvance increments in her ^^J^ ^'^ H^T^T[T[5RI:3?TF^—2;S/9S—} 1 /200S—1,00.000. ./;M. "^ 's.. ^^/ ' •-^^^^•° 'T^T ^I^K-T^; ^TlW4S<c, T^TOTy WWtT w>*ii^' "^ 200 3?1^?T ^W (^t^^) ^llt^T^T^^W ^?T^?i ^^W <P<TOT'Z^T 3^T -^ salary even though she did her expenses before joining on the Learned counsel for the ^T^f^h 'HR'^f ^f ft^t Tf^^K ^T 3^1 371^1 P.Ed. Examination at her own l^ost of Assistant Teacher. jpetitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely co^ered by the decision of this in W.P. (s) No.591/2009 betwejen Preetam Singh Parihar and others Versus The State of Chhat|-isgarh and another decided by this Court and this petition may l^e disposed of in terms of the direction given by this Court in thejaforesaid matter. The above fact has not be^n disputed by learned counsel for the State. In view of above, the instar|t petition is disposedof with a direction to the respondents tc| increments to the petitioner fronji make payment of two advance the date of her appointment within a period two months from t^day. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications mad^ by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. No order as to costs. 1 Sd/- DhirendraMisbra Judge ^mT^b ^^ Hsnlr^^ ??^Rt?3H^—FS/95—11 /209S—1,00,900.