IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 37388 of 2008(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- REGIMON P.ALEX, PADIKKAPARAMBIL, KOOTHATTUKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.R.SADEESAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KOOTHATTUKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM - 686 662 2. KOOTHATTUKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SHRI.JAIJI MATHEW, S/O.LATE MATHEW, ERAMBADATHIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., RESIDING AT FLAT NO.802, BLUE LAGOON APARTMENTS, CHILAVANNOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 4. DR.DEEPTHI, W/O.JAIJY MATHEW, ERAMBADATHIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., RESIDING AT FLAT NO.802, BLUE LAGOON APARTMENTS, CHILAVANNOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW FOR R3 & R4 SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM - FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 37388/2008. ------------------------------------------------------------------ EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT. EXT.P2 APPLICATION DT. 10-12-2007. EXT.P3 BUILDING PERMIT DT. 6-3-2008. EXT.P4 APPLICATION DT. 7-8-2008. EXT.P5 NOTICE DT. 11-8-2008. EXT.P6 ORDER DT. 7-3-2009. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 37388 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 20th March, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges a proposed construction by the respondents 3 and 4. According to the petitioner, the permit for construction of the same has been obtained by misrepresentation of facts. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext. P4 application before the 1st respondent for cancellation of the permit. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Ext. P4. 2. Learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that Ext. P4 would be considered after hearing the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P4 petition filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from today. It would be open to respondents 3 and 4 to raise the question of maintainability of the petition itself. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/