IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8095 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 05, 2010. Sharanjit Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Onkar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns selection to the post of Assistant Librarian on the ground that she was one of the candidates but her merit has not been correctly determined by awarding appropriate marks for higher qualification of M.Lib. possessed by her. The petitioner's case is that if appropriate marks are awarded to her for the above-mentioned qualification, she will make it to the merit list. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities a few days back vide representation dated 29.4.2010 (Annexure P-8) but without any response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and keeping in view the factual assertion made by the petitioner, I am of the considered view that it is imperative upon respondent Nos.2 & 3 to C.W.P.No .8095 of 2010 2 verify the facts so as to redress the grievances of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to summon the records, verify the claim put-forth by the petitioner and determine as to whether or not she is entitled to be awarded marks for the higher qualification possessed by her and if she makes it or not to the merit list. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. May 05, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE