IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2011 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 13272 of 2011(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- GEETHAMMA,THANNIVILA VEEDU, HOUSE NO.50, MANGADU P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.PRATHEESH.P SRI. K.SIJU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM (RURAL), KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM - 691 506. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EZHUKONE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. 3. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM - 691 013. 4. SRI.MURALEEDHARAN, BRANCH SECRETARY, AITUC, KAREEPRA BRANCH,KUNDARA, KOLLAM - 691 501. 5. SRI.TYAGARAJAN, BRANCH SECRETARY, CITU, KAREEPRA BRANCH, KUNDARA, KOLLAM - 691 501. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA R4 BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR R5 BY ADVS. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS SRI.MURALI MADANTHACODU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 13272/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 06/06/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.13272 of 2011-H ***************************** Dated this the 26th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. This petition is for police protection. Protection is claimed by the petitioner against apprehended illegal and unjustified conduct on the part of respondents 4 and 5. The Bench which dealt with the matter on 17.05.2011 had issued interim directions. We extract below the relevant observations/directions in para.2 of the said order. “It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 5 that the factory is functioning smoothly and they have not physically obstructed the loading and unloading of goods from and to the factory. The said submission is recorded. In case of any obstruction from the part of respondents 4 and 5 or anybody under them, the second respondent will grant adequate protection to the petitioner to run the factory smoothly.” W.P(C) No.13272 of 2011-H 2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays; the learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 accepts; and the learned Government Pleader agrees, that the interim directions issued on 17.05.2011 can now be made absolute and further proceedings can be discontinued. 3. We accept that request. This Writ Petition is, in these circumstances, allowed. The interim order dated 17.05.2011 extracted above is made absolute. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/