Civil Revision No.5192/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5192/2011 Date of Decision:29.8.2011 Sukhdev Singh ...................Petitioner vs Parvinder Kaur and others ...................Respondents. Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present:- Mr.SS Dinarpur,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral) Petitioner/JD-Sukhdev Singh has filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 28.7.2011(P4) passed by learned Executing Court, Kurukshetra ordering issuance of warrant of attachment of the property/land of the petitioner. Briefly noticed the facts of the case are that petitioner- Sukhdev Singh alongwith his sons Jarnail Singh and Karnail Singh (proforma respondents 5 and 6 herein) were accused in case FIR No. 181 dated 20.10.1998 under Section 302/34 IPC regarding murder of one Ajaib Singh, son of respondent no.4, husband of respondent no.1 Civil Revision No.5192/2011 2 and father of respondents 2 and 3. The sons of the petitioner were convicted under Section 302/34 IPC, and are presently lodged in Central Jail, Ambala, whereas the petitioner was acquitted. Subsequently, the dependents of deceased Ajaib Singh filed a civil suit against the petitioner and his sons for recovery of Rs.7 lacs by way of damages on account of murder of Ajaib Singh. The said suit was decreed by the learned trial court vide judgment and decree dated 18.10.2007 (P1) and the plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 4 herein) were held entitled to a compensation to the tune of Rs.3,84,000/- alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realization. The petitioner alongwith his sons were held jointly and severally liable to pay the said amount. The appeal filed by the petitioner and his sons was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra vide judgment and decree dated 31.3.2009. Thereafter the petitioner and his sons filed Regular Second Appeal bearing no.3740 of 2009 which was admitted qua petitioner-Sukhdev Singh by this Court vide order dated 18.5.2010. However, the operation of the impugned judgments and decrees was not stayed and the amount,if any, deposited by the appellants (petitioner and his sons) was permitted to be withdrawn by the respondents after furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Executing Court. In pursuance of the aforesaid judgment and decree, respondents 1 to 4 filed execution petition before the leaned Executing Court, Kurukshetra, which passed impugned order dated 28.7.2011 Civil Revision No.5192/2011 3 (P4) by observing that as per decree dated 18.10.2007 the decree was passed against the petitioner and his sons jointly and severally and accordingly, warrant of attachment of the property of the JDs mentioned in the fard talika was ordered to be issued for 15.10.2011. Hence the present revision petition. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this revision petition. Dismissed as not pressed. 29.8.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge