1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD)NO. 12059 of 2011 Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner Versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Shanarpatty Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner representation dated 15.08.2011 and provide police protection to the petitioner and their family members. For Petitioner : Mr.R.N.Marivel For Respondents: Mr.K.V.Rajarajan,Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This petition is filed seeking for a direction, directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 15.08.2011 and provide police protection to the petitioner and their family members. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a representation to the first respondent stating that he wants police protection for his life and limb, but the same has not been considered so far and hence, he has come forward with the present petition. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, both parties were called for enquiry and at that time, the petitioner himself has admitted that there is no further action is necessary and hence, the same was closed. 4. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the statement given by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) is not correct and the petitioner has not appeared before the police station and he has not given any undertaking for not to proceed the case and therefore, he prays for an order. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the fact that since the earlier application dated 15.08.2011 has been closed, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation to the second respondent within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the second respondent is directed to consider the fresh representation of the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of receipt of the same. 6. With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. SD DEPUTY REGISTRAR ( Writs ) /TRUE COPY/ vsm ASST REGISTRAR To:: 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Shanarpatty Police Station, Dindigul Dist. 3.The Addl Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 1CC TO MR. R.N. MARIVEL, ADVOCATE, SR: 32488: DM::2011:SEPTEMBER:27:: Crl.O.P.(MD)NO. 12059 of 2011 1P:4C:: 21.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/