IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 24TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1906 of 2008(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. N.VIJAYAN, CHAKKALAYIL, THODIYOOR NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 2. R.SADHIK, PALAPPALLY THEKKETHIL, THODIYOOR NORTH P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.1906/2008 B APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER DTD. 18/12/2006. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD. 27/06/2007. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT ADJOURNING THE APPLICATION OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DTD. 5/11/2007. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT ADJOURNING THE APPLICATION OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD. 5/11/2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 1906 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 13, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners submitted Exts.P1 and P2 renewal applications. These applications were considered by the 1st respondent and by Exts.P3 and P4 the applications were adjourned in view of the pendency of SLP(C) No.9466/07 filed by the KSRTC before the Supreme Court. The routes applied for by the petitioners are Karunagappally HS - Adoor and Karunagappally - Kottarakkara whereas the subject matter of the SLP mentioned above is Trivandrum - Trivandrum circular scheme. 2. The subject matter of the SLP is totally irrelevant in so far as the application made by the petitioner is concerned. In view of this I direct that the 1st respondent shall take up and consider Exts.P1 and P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-