1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.C.A.W. 236/2011 IN W.P.303/2011 TARUNKUMAR LEELADHAR JOSHI ..VS.. DIVAKAR BELSARE & 2 ORS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 27, 2011. Heard Shri Paliwal, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Gaikwad, the learned counsel for the respondent. It appears that after this court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner by an order dated 25.1.2011, the petitioner applied before the executing court seeking time to vacate the suit premises as the petitioner was doing his business in the same since the year 1990. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the said request was inadvertently not made to this court when the writ petition was decided on 25.1.2011 and hence the application was moved before the executing court. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that three months time may be granted to the petitioner for vacating the suit premises. 2 Shri Gaikwad, the learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposes the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the petitioner was carrying on his business in the suit premises for almost 20 years, the petitioner is granted three months time from the date of this order to vacate the suit premises. The civil application is allowed to the aforesaid extent and disposed of. JUDGE SMP