IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3143 of 2011 DHIRAJ KUMAR YADAV @ BACCHU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Initially, Didarganj P.S. Case no.5/2010 was registered under section 392 of the IPC but subsequently, section 395 of the IPC was added. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and in course of investigation, his name sprang on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Subsequently, petitioner was arrested in connection with another case and made his confessional statement accepting his guilt in respect of the present case also. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that petitioner has already been granted privilege of bail in Fatuha P.S.52/2010 and so far as present case is concerned, co-accused Sahen Sah @ Langra as well as several other co-accused persons have already been allowed bail by this court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar Yadav @ Bacchu Yadav @ Dhiraj, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge I, Patnacity in Sessions Trial no. 1401/2010 arising out of Didarganj P.S. Case no. 5 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)