IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 4TH ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 891 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22644/2009 Dated 23/03/2010 .................... PETITIONER: PETITIONER ---------------------------------------- DR. XAVIER MATHEW, S/O. MATHAI, AGED 54 YEARS, EDAYAKKATUKUDIYIL HOUSE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, MARADI VILLGE, MARADI P.O, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ISSOLA DE COCO HOLIDAYING PVT. LTD. BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT NO.1 -------------------------------------------------- K.M. SREEDHARAN NAIR, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, NEYYATINKARA-695 121. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI V.VIJULAL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN CO(C)No.891/11 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)No. 22644/09 DT.23.3.10. ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF REPORT NO.G3-15907/09 DT.5.8.10 SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. ANNEXURE A3: COPY OF THE SKETCH. ANNEXURE A4: COPY OF REPLY NO.13/11 DT.23.7.11 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THIRUPURAM TO THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.891 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T Alleging non-compliance of the directions issued in Annexure-A1 judgment, this Contempt of Court Case has been filed. One of the directions issued was to arrange a survey to be done through the 2nd respondent, after notice to the petitioner. 2. The learned Government Pleader made available a letter from the Tahsildar, which shows that a survey has been conducted on 29.7.2011. Further actions have also been taken in the matter. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is challenging the resultant order which is adverse to the petitioner. Leaving open the said remedy, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn