HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.495 of 2009 Date: 12.03.2010 Between: Challa Venkateswarlu … Petitioner and Narumanchi Naga Lakshmi Vasundhara … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.495 of 2009 ORAL ORDER : Though Smt. M.S.Tirumala Rani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that she has no instructions or knowledge about the letter dated 12.3.2009 said to have been addressed to her by the client instructing her to withdraw the civil revision petition, a copy of the said letter marked to the Registrar (Judicial) is on record. 2. In view of the said letter dated 12.3.2009 and after comparing the signature of the petitioner on the said letter as well as on the vakalat, I believe that the letter, in fact, was addressed to the counsel and a copy of which is marked to the Registrar (Judicial). There is no other plausible reason to disbelieve the letter addressed to the Registrar (Judicial). 3. Therefore, having regard to the facts and circumstances, particularly in the light of the letter dated 12.3.2009 addressed by the petitioner instructing the counsel to withdraw the civil revision petition, permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 5. It is made clear that, in any event, the above letter is found to be incorrect, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court in an appropriate manner as permissible under law. ________________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 12.03.2010. Msr HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.495 of 2009 12.03.2010 (Msr)