IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. Criminal Writ Petition No. 383 of 2008 Surendra Singh Nayal ----Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and two others. ----Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Dated May 22, 2008: Per Coram:- Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for respondent no.3/complainant. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of First Information Report dated 22.04.2008 registered as case crime no. 80 of 2008 relating to offences punishable u/s 504, 506 I.P.C. and one punishable u/s ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 with Police Station Ramnagar, District Nainital. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Brief Holder for the State and learned counsel for the complainant and after going through the contents of the First Information Report, which discloses serious allegations against accused, we are not inclined to interfere with the investigation in the matter. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. The stay application no. 3001/2008 stands rejected. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 22.05.2008 NCM