IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6488 of 2008 Date of Decision: March 26, 2009 Harbhajan Dass. … Petitioner Versus Sada Ram. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. G.B.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate for the respondent. S.D. Anand, J. On consensual basis, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the trial itself by or on 30.05.2009. The case is already fixed for recording of the evidence of the plaintiff who shall avail of that opportunity and shall also be entitled to one more opportunity for concluding the evidence. Thereafter, the defendant therein shall also have two adjournments for concluding the evidence. If any party is inclined to summon any official witness, it shall be entitled to take dasti summons but the non return or non-effecting of service thereof would not entitle that party to ask for any further adjournment. C.R. No. 6488 of 2008 The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned District Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned period. Disposed of accordingly. March 26, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2