Crl. Misc. No. M-36143 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-36143 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 30, 2011 Gurjant Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is attributed an injury dangerous to life with a brick bat on the upper part of the eye of victim Veena. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner did not have any pre-plan or intention to inflict injury on the person of Veena. It has also been argued that it is apparently a case of cross-version as one lady on the side of the petitioner has received a grievous injury attracting offence under Section 326 IPC. Crl. Misc. No. M-36143 of 2011 [2] I have heard counsel for the petitioner and considered his contention. It will be premature at this stage to enter into the niceties of the trial to form an opinion regarding the intention of the petitioner. The fact remains that the petitioner has inflicted an injury dangerous to life on the person of a lady. No extraordinary exceptional circumstances exist to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. November 30, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE