IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50573 of 2008 1. RAMAKANT JHA 2. RAM SWAROOP BHAGAT @ RAM SWAROOP BHAKTH ---- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. In the case, petitioners have been alleged for misappropriation during the year 1999-2000. Learned counsel submits that no any article was received or any amount was defalcated by the petitioners which is supported by the witnesses also. So no case for defalcation is made out rather complaint was lodged to save the misdeed. Petitioners have no concern with the receiving of goods or articles. Witnesses are also in conformity with non-receiving of any article. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Motihari Town P.S.Case No.139 of 2000, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on - 2 - furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI