IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 4201 of 2009. Date of Decision: 18th March, 2009. M/s Sanjiv Industries Petitioner through Mr. S.K.Singla,Advocate Versus The Director of Industries & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner seeks a direction for the release of payment of Octroi refund for the year 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98 to the tune of Rs.10,20,260/-. According to the petitioner, the aforesaid refund is to be made by respondent No. 2. In support of its claim, the petitioner has placed on record a letter dated 18.4.2007 [Annexure P-10] sent by respondent No. 2 to respondent No.1 asking for allocation of funds so that Octroi refund could be disbursed to the petitioner. It appears that the said refund has not been made to the petitioner for want of funds with respondent No.2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's claim regarding disbursement of the sanctioned Octroi Refund and release the necessary payment, if any, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. March 18, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE