HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.3098 and 3099 of 2011 Date:27.08.2011 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3098 of 2011 Between: Voruganti Bharathi and another. ..... Petitioners AND K.V.S.N.V.Prasad and two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Pinnamaneni Ramakrishna Counsel for Respondents : Sri P.R.Prasad AND CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.3099 of 2011 Between: Voruganti Bharathi and another. ..... Petitioners AND K.V.S.N.V.Prasad and two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Pinnamaneni Ramakrishna Counsel for Respondents : Sri P.R.Prasad The Court made the following: ORDER: These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of orders, dated 25.07.2011, in I.A.Nos.197 and 198 of 2011 in A.S.No.13 of 2011 on the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge (III Fast Track Court), Nalgonda at Miryalguda. On 20.08.2011, when this case came up for hearing, Sri P.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that as the very appeal in which the orders passed were subject matter of the present Civil Revision Petitions was disposed of on 19.08.2011, the Civil Revision Petitions have become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners sought for an adjournment for taking instructions on this aspect. Accordingly, the case was adjourned. When the case came up today, learned counsel for the petitioners reported no instructions. Sri P.R.Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that A.S.No.13 of 2011 was disposed of on 18.08.2011 and not on 19.08.2011 as was represented earlier. In view of this submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Civil Revision Petitions, C.R.P.M.P.No.4428 of 2011 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th August, 2011 DR