IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1223 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1223 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1223 OF 2005 Ramesh V. Inamdar................Petitioner Vs. The University of Mumbai & Ors....Respondents Mr.Mihir Desai, for the Petitioner Mr. R.A. Rodrigues, for the Respondents. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 2nd August, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. It is the case of the petitioner that considering Ordinance No.215 even if the petitioner has not appeared for examination during the course of five years it is still open to the Vice Chancellor to exempt students from the provisions of the above Ordinance on the merits of each case. The respondents have filed a reply to which is annexed a note dated 10th September, 2004 to the Officiating Controller of Examinations. 2. Considering that there is a power, it will be open to the petitioner to make a representation to the Vice Chancellor and the Vice Chancellor thereafter if need be to hear the petitioner and pass appropriate orders according to law at any rate not later than four weeks from the representation being received by the Vice Chancellor. . With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J). (F.I. REBELLO, J) F.I. REBELLO, J) F.I. REBELLO, J)