IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14028 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BIJU M.R., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. RAGHAVAN, MODANGATTIL HOUSE, KANNIYAMPURAM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM-678 101. 2. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, MUSEUM JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 035. GP SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).14028/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is the owner of the property concerned which, according to the petitioner, is a dry land/purayidam though described as 'nilam' in the revenue records, filed Ext.P2 petition for necessary consent under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order which, however happened to be dismissed as per Ext.P4 order passed by the first respondent. Being aggrieved of the same petitioner took up the matter in appeal before the second respondent and as per Ext.P5 order dated 22.2.2010, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded by the second respondent for fresh consideration. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the lapse of more than 1½ years, proceedings are still to be finalised by the first respondent which is sought to be interfered. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. In the above circumstances the first respondent is directed to reconsider Ext.P2 application as ordered in W.P.(C).14028/11 2 Ext.P5 order passed by the second respondent/appellate authority and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs