Crl.M. No. M-35488 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-35488 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.12.2010 ... Noor Hasan @ Narsain and others ................Petitioners vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Kuldip Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners Sh. Ajay Gulati, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Sh. Ajit Atri, Advocate for the complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioners took ` 10 lacs for the purchase of land for the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is not even a single document evidencing the transaction for sale. In fact the petitioners have moved an application before the District Magistrate and DGP, prior to the present FIR. Prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail. I have considered the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, but do not find any force in that submission. There was Crl.M. No. M-35488 of 2010 -2- some transaction between the parties as per the representation of the petitioners. Mere fact that there is no written agreement, does not make the petitioners entitled for concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 22.12.2010 Judge chugh