HIGH cOURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH, BILASPUR w.P. ‘3) No.6613/2oo7 PETITIONER Smt, Devsir Bai Netam wife of Shri Dayaram, agtd about 60 years, resident of Gangrel Colony, Gangml, Post Gangml, Tahsil and Distt. Dhamtari (C. G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secmtaiy, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Sub Divisional OEicer, Water Management, Sub-Division No.9, Gangrel, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.). 3. The Executive Engineer, Water Management Division, Rudri, Distt. Dhamtari(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shn' RP. Sahu, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri N,K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate and Deputy Advocate General with Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State] respondents. ORAL ORDER (31.10.2007) semi. KUMAR smHA, .J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a permanent Gang—man is to be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhim'yam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. WP. No. 108/ 2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 (Govind & Others vs. State 0f C.G. and others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. 2 W.P. (S) No.6613/2007 @ Learned counsel for the State fairly agrees that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits that i some matters the State has hled Writ appeals. Unless some interim order is passed, merely on account of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept in abeyance, when the matter is squarely covered by the said judgment. In the result, this peh'tion is allowed, <7 It is disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 \_ passed in W.P. No.108/2005 and other connected matters. No order as to cost. l I l Sd/- Judge Raol Shynap Sunil Kumar Sinha f J n