PETITIONER Versus 2. 3. Viiay Agrawal. S/o. Late SIiri SitaraiE. Agrawal, aged about- 58 years, R/o. Crooked Laae, Flat No. G-5, Groiind Floor, Kolkata, 70069 (WB) (Ex-Director of M/s. Gravity Trexiin (P) Ltd., Haviug its registered ofiice at G-5, Ground Floor 1, Crooked Laae, Kolkata-70069 (WB). salii Works at Vulage AchoU, Uria Industrial Area, P.S. Urla, Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG) Envu-oninent Board, Raipu-r (CG) Region.al Officer Environineat Board, Regional hig 9 ,10 & 11, Chhattisgarh Conservation Through CIihattisgarh Conservation Ofilce, New Tatibaadli Raipur District Raipur (CG) The State of ChIiattisRai-h through the Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Environment, DKS bhawaa, Maatralaya, G.E. Road, Raipur (CG) M/s. Gravily Texim. (P) Ltd., Haviag its registered office at G-5, Floor 1, Crooked Lane, Kolkata, 70069 (\?/B) aad Works at ViBage Acholi, Urla Industrial Area, P.S. Urla, REUpur, District Rsdpur (CG) (SB :Hoa'ble81»riT.P.Sharma, J.) Present: .Shri Md. Asif, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Sudhir Bajpai, Advocate wifh Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, counsel for reagpndent No. 1. ,Shri U.K.S.Chaiidel, Paael Lawyer for fhe State/respondent No.2. Shri S.K.Tiwari, counsel for respondent Nb.3. -.^l- r 'rf^'l. ••"s^s^- :';^f;'\ ^ •^;Li rSi \"<a^^y .sy (Passed oa 7tB March 3008) This petition is directed agauist tbe orders dated 29.4.2005, 5.7.2005, 22.8..2005 and* 29.8.2005 passed by the leamed Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur purportmg to take cognizaa.ee of the oifences under Sections 37 aad 40 of the Air {Prevention aiid Control of PoUution) Act, 1981 read with Section 34 of the IPC against fhe petitioners. '~ . _ I 2. The iiistant petition'is filed for quashiuent of coinplaiat case No. 803/2005 pendiag'before the Ctuef Judicial Magistrate, Raipur for the offence punishable 'uiider. Secuon 37 aad 40 of the Air (Prevention aad Control of PoUution) Act, 1981 read with Section 34oftheIPC. Sllt.. '*>^ .. •h^Ki;-iig- t. ! ^:f 3. During the course of arguinent, it is subiiutted on behalf of the parties fhat ia fhe light oforder dated 7th August 2007 passed by fhis Court in Cr.M.P. No. 176/2006, fhe coiaplamt pending before tlie tri.al Court is not coiapeteut and Uberty be extended to the i^spondent No. 1 to file fresh coiuplaiat. 4. In fhe light ofthe oi-der dated 7th August 2007 passed by this Court in. Cr.M.P. No. 176/2006, which is of similar natu-re, the coiuplaint aiid proceediiig pcndiug before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipiir deserves to be quashed aiid is hereby quashed. However, it shaU be opeu to the respondent Boaru to jEile fresh coinplain.t, disclosiiig aU necessaiy particulars, which luay fasteis. the criminal liabiUty agaiast theiQ, iffhey so desire. ^SdJ-'/ T.P.Sharma Judge \...