THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.14802 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the respondents 1 and 3 to undertake investigation in relation to property in plot Nos.27 and 28, in Sy.Nos.2, 3 and 5, and Part No.1, bearing Municipal No.18- 13-9/84/3, of Bandlaguda, Hyderabad. Directions are also sought against the 3rd respondent to the effect that, in case respondents 4 to 10 submit any documents for registration, with reference to the said lands, to refuse such registration. The petitioner traced her relation to respondents 4 to 10, and submits that the property mentioned above, which was required by her father, is being enjoyed by them (respondents 4 to 10); to her exclusion. It is alleged that respondents 4 to 10 do not have any right over the property, and still, several documents presented by them or their GPAs were entertained and registered by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner contends that she came to know that respondent No.4 executed gift settlement deeds, as well as cancellation deeds indiscriminately, and without any verification, the 3rd respondent entertained all the documents. Ultimately it is prayed that the 3rd respondent be restrained from entertaining any documents, presented by respondents 4 to 10, in respect of the property, referred to above. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Even if the facts pleaded by the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition are taken on their face value, at the most it amounts to a civil dispute between the petitioner, on the one hand, and respondents 4 to 10, on the other hand. The Registering Authority has no power to decide the civil disputes, much less to refuse registration of the documents, on the allegations of such disputes. If the petitioner is so advised, she has to file a suit with necessary relief in a Civil Court, and seek redressal. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue her remedies by filing a civil suit. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ Dt.17-02-2009. L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. KO