THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1554 OF 2002 ORDER: 1 Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.2115 of 2002 in C.C.No.26 of 2000 dated 09.08.2002, whereby the learned Special Judge discharged the respondents herein, the complainant before the court below preferred this revision. 2 Facts in brief are that the petitioner who is a shareholder of the first respondent Company filed C.C.No.26 of 2000 before the court below for the offences punishable under sections 68 and 68 A of the Companies Act and under sections 409, 418 and 420 r/w 34 of IPC. 3. While the said C.C. is pending, the respondents herein filed an application under section 245 of Cr.P.C. seeking to discharge them of the said offences. The court below by its detailed order dated 09.08.2002 allowed the said application. Hence the present revision. 4. Heard. 5. Having gone through the order impugned in this revision, this court is of the view that the court below is perfectly justified in discharging the respondents herein. When no offence is made out against the respondents herein for the offences punishable under sections 68 and 68 A of the Companies Act, the court below, being the Special Court constituted for the purpose of dealing with the offences falling under the Companies Act, cannot try the accused for the offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code when there is no offence made out against them under the Companies Act. Accordingly, I see no merits in this revision and hence the same is dismissed. --------------- 15.07.2010 Kvsn