IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 13840 of 2008. Decided on: 03.03.2011. _________________________________________________ Er. Om Parkash Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K. Paul, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Respondent No.3 ex-parte. Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in S.S. Kutlehria and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No.1358 of 2008 alongwith LPA No.65 of 2009, decided on 8th January, 2010. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of in view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in the judgment referred to above. Consequences to ensue. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. March 03, 2011. (sck).