C7 c& IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (S) N0. €>333 OF 2009 (S.B.) ^^0 PETITIONERS ..-•^. \^\..^^' ^^::A^%- %%r 1 l^Pravirchand Nag S/o Late Kunwarchand Nag, aged about 30 years, Occupation - Teacher, Presently posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram Dhanora, Tahsil and District - Narayanpur (C.G.) R/o village Muchnar, Pujaripara, Post Barsur, Tahsil Gidam, District Dantewada (C.G.). 2. Smt. Kavita Nag w/o Shri Pravirchand Nag, aged about 29 years, Occupation - Teacher, Presently Posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram Dhanora, Tahsil and District Narayanpur (C.G.) R/o village Muchnar, Pujaripara, Post Barsur, Tahsil Gidam, District Dantewada (C.G.). VERSUS 1, State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Collector, District Collectorate, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.). 4. The Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil & District Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 RESPONDENTS HIGH COU'RT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON fS) No. 5399 of2009 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Pravirchand Nag & another. VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Aniit WRrLPETITION LTNDER .^RTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITLTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri^ Present: Sliri Amiya. Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondeiits 1 to 3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 25th day of September, 2009) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 1. Leanied counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered m Smt A.Lall v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others , thus the petitioners may be peniiitted to make a representation to decide their case in the liglit ofaforestated decision, subject to verificatioii asto whether the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Govermiient Aided school and the petitioners are teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed couiisel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the sanie will be considered and decided- in accordance with law, vvithin a period offour weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioners- nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ——— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 ^^.^- ./- 2007 (l)BLJ 265