^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR REVIEW PETITION N0. ^ OF 2010 Applicants f ,- ,^>^^ ^...-^ -^^y' 1. 2. 3. -, ^»- ^•'" ' ^c*'** ' MA.^ ^,:..A^- Smt. Vimal Singh Wd/o Late Nihal Singh, Aged 70 years. Smt. Beula Soni, D/o Late Nihal Singh, Aged 38 Years, Dr. Vikrant Singh, S/o Late Nihal Singh, Aged about 3.6 years, Ms. Viola Singh, D/o Late Nihal Singh, Aged about 36 year [Applicants No. 1 to 4 R/o Jarahabhata, Bilaspur (C.G.] Versus oh-Applicants ^' .3. 4. 5. Rajesh Nandeshwar, S/o Shri Dukaluram Nandeshwar, Caste Mahar, aged about 36 years, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Dongargarh, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) Petitioner State of Chhattisgarh, through the secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. The Collector, Distt. Rajnandgaon. Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Dongargarh, Distf. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Resnondents 1 to 4 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 14.12.2009' (Arising out of the order, passed by the Singh Bench of this Hon'ble High Court in W.P. (227)no. 7252/2009) ^ 1. That, the applicants herein were the respondents 5 to8 in the W.P. (227) No. 7252/2009, Whereas, the Non-applicant //^ i;- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANTS Review Petition No. 6 of 2010 Smt. Vimal Singh & Others Versus NON-APPLICANTS : Rajesh Nandeshwar & Others ApolicatiQnJor review ofthe order dated 14.12.2009 (SB: Hon'bie Mr. NX. AqarwaS, J.) Present : Shri NL Soni, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for respondent No. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 23ro day of October, 2010) Heard. 3. By this review petition, the applicants seek review of order dated 14.12.2009 passed in W.P.{227) No. 7252/2009 (Rajesh Nandeshwar v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others). This Court, after having considered all the aspects of the matter, disposed of the petition directing the SDO to first get the caste certificate of the respondents verified from the Caste Scrutiny Committee by sending it for its verification and only thereafter shall proceed to pass the order in the matter in accordance with law. Shri Soni, learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the caste certificate of late Nihal Singh was questioned by the respondents, whereas in the impugned order passed by this court, the reference was made all the respondent's caste certificate, therefore, that requires suitable modification. ® Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 has no objection on the above prayer. After going through the order impugned, this court found that the question raised was regarding the caste certificate of late Nihal Singh, whereas this court directed the SDO to first get the caste certificate of the respondents verified from the Caste Scrutiny Committee by sending it for its verification. Therefore, the review petition deserves to be and is hereby allowed. The order dated 14.12.2009 is modified to the extent that the SDO shall first get the caste certificate of late Nihal Singh verified from the Caste Scrutiny Committee by sending it for its verification and only thereafter shall proceed to pass the order in the matter in accordance with law. No order asto costs. Sahu Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge