1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3076 OF 2006 PETITION NO.3076 OF 2006 PETITION NO.3076 OF 2006 Smt.Satyawati B. Mestry..Petitioner Vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. M.D. Pakale, for the petitioner Mr. Abhijeet Wagh i/b. Utangale & Co., for respondent No.1. Ms. Shobha Ajithkumar for B.M.C. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. , JJ. , JJ. DATE: 7TH NOVEMBER,2006 P.C. . It is the case of the petitioner that there is a society known as Nalanda Co-operative Housing Society (Proposed) and that the petitioner’s name is included at Serial No.83. It is, however, the case of the petitioner that there are malpractices. Once the petitioner is held to be eligible as member of the society we do not propose to interfere in the exercise of our extra ordinary jurisdiction as the experience of this Court is that such petitioners are put up by rival builders only to prevent the development of the property under the SRA Scheme. The principal object which this Court noticed is that slum dwellers must get a proper decent habitation and this Court will not encourage such proxy litigation at the hands of the Builders. If the petitioner has 2 any grievance he can file a complaint with the S.R.A. It is for the SRA to consider the same. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).