CRM-M-27013-2011 [ 1 ] :::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27013-2011 Date of decision:01.11.2011 Surender ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Gourav Mohunta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. S.N.Yadav, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.152 dated 21.04.2011, under Sections 323, 325 and 307 of IPC at Police Station Mohindergarh, District Mohindergarh. The petitioner is allegedly the main accused who had caused injuries on the head of Umrao Singh who is the father of the complainant Deepak. At the time of notice of motion, it was pointed out that the occurrence took place on 07.03.2011. The injured Umrao Singh was medico legally examined on the same date and the doctor had noticed three injuries on his person. He observed with regard to injury No.1 that opinion of Neruo Surgeon be taken and with regard to injuries No.2 and 3, X-ray was advised. It was submitted that the X-ray was conducted on 21.04.2011 after the expiry of 1-½ month from the date of occurrence and at that time fracture was found. In that background, the petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail. CRM-M-27013-2011 [ 2 ] :::::::: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already joined the investigation but the learned State Counsel assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant has argued that the petitioner did not project the case in its true perspective as according to the report of the PGIMS, Rohtak, the X-ray was conducted on 07.03.2011 in which two fractures of the parietal bone and the right orbit were found. It is further submitted here that the as per Dr. Parvinder, who had attended the injured Umrao Singh was conservatively treated for the fractures and discharged him on 10.03.2011 in a stable condition. Learned State Counsel has also pointed out that the X-ray was conducted on 07.03.2011, but the opinion was sought on 26.03.2011 which was given on 26.04.2011 in which the injuries suffered by Umrao Singh have been declared to be dangerous to life. After hearing both the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find it to a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. Consequently, the interim order dated 06.09.2011 granted by this Court is hereby vacated. November 01, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE