IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29445 of 2011 Vijay Kumar Bharti Versus The Central Bureau Of Investig ----------- 4/ 25/10/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the CBI, Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha. Also gone through the prayer made by the petitioner. The simple submission raised on behalf of the petitione happens to be that he had not been furnished with all the relevant documents over which the CBI is going to rely during conduction of trial and in the light of aforesaid deficiencies, there happens to be non compliance of Section 207 of the Cr.P.C. Further submitted that instead of furnishing copy of T.A. Bill for the month of June and July 2008 along with seizure memo dated 20.02.2009, petitioner has been furnished with T.A. journal which happens to be sought for and relied upon. The learned counsel for the CBI submitted that from receiving receipt it is evident that those items have already been received by the petitioner himself and for that submitted photo copy of receipt. Be that as it may, the documents over which prosecution is going to rely, a copy thereof has to be handed 2 over to the accused which happens to be the spirit of Section 207 of the Cr.P.C.. For the present, I do not want to take the issue of nature of document whether it happens to be T.A. journal or T.A. Bill for the month of June and July 2008 along with seizure memo dated 20.02.2009 as it will not serve any fruitful purpose and therefore, the court concerned is directed to make T.A. bill for the month of June and July 2008 along with seizure memo dated 20.02.2009 furnished upon the petitioner/accused by next date. With the aforesaid direction, the instant petition is disposed of. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi,J.)