IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8280 of 2009 MEENA RAI, D/O DEEP NARAYAN THAKUR, R/O MOHALLA-LAKHIBAGH, P.S.-MUFASIL, DISTRICT- GAYA. ……………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GAYA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BUNIYADGANJ MUFFASIL BLOCK, GAYA. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 15.11.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the Appellate Authority, Gaya has already passed order in favour of the petitioner which is contained in Annexure-7. Inspite of the same, petitioner is not being allowed to appear in the counseling. No counter affidavit has been filed in this case till now. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondents to comply with the order passed by the Appellate Authority and if counseling has not been held till today petitioner should be allowed to appear in the counseling. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)