IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-13245 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 03.05.2011 Ajaib Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Mahesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 19.04.2011 (Annexure P6) passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mohali, dismissing the revision petition under Section 52(b) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 (herein after to be referred as 'the Act') against the order dated 11.03.2010 (Annexures P3 and P4) Mr. Mahesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that under Section 52-A of the Act, no offence is made out, as the goods had been seized in Chandgiarh and the Court at Ropar had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint under the Act. This argument is not available with the learned counsel for the petitioner, as the petitioner had driven the tampo from Tanda Karoran, Tehsil Kharar, Distt. Mohali to Chandigarh. The various officials had chased him and thereafter the said tampo was taken into possession by the police. In view of the above factual position, the Court at Ropar had jurisdiction to entertain the complaint under Section 52 of the Act Dismissed as having no merits. May 03, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE