^ES*:%?- -w. \6f\< c IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATUREAT BILASPUR,C.G. WRIT PETITION N0. ^J- 7 ,/2002 (Pedtion imder article 226/227 offhe Constitution ofIndia) PETITIONER Gram Panchayat, Ghutia, Block Developmet^. Navagarh, (hroiigh its Sarpanch^'Ramhari, aged about 40 years, S/o Vishambhar, R/o vfflage Darri, PO. Dhaneli, Tahsil Navagarh, Distt. Jaajgif Champa. VERSUS ..^^ ^:"T>^>:^>^^ .^^:o^t: ^K^.-" RESPONDENTS : 1) The Coflector, Janjgir Chsmipa, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 2) Dy. Director Cum Chief Execulive officer, Fisheries Departmeiit, Janjgir Cliampa, (C.G.) 3) Chief Executive Offlcer, Jila Panchayat, Janjgir Chaunpa, Distt. Janjgu' Champa, (C.G.) 4) The Preadent Bhavishya Jan Kalyan, Machhua Sahakari Satniti, Village Dani, Block Development Navagarh, fhrough its president Karatnchand Suryavanshi, R/o ^ Darri, police station Pamgarii, Distt. Janjgir Champa. (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA FORISSUEING AN APPROPRIATE WMT,DIRECT!ONSANDPRDERS. ^y^' <;^'^.. .-•••• ..^ •"' ^^~ •^ _|__,_Z^-MC*,;n-,n •»-.-. -r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION N0.1517 OF 2002 Gram Panchayat,Ghutia Versus RESEQNDENTS The Collector, Janjgir Champa & Others. (Writ Petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Vishnu Kosta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 24th day of November, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the other side have no objection. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Gowri