1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5440 of 2008 Smt Narsamma and anr v. State and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.V. Manohar, Adv for petitioners. Mr Nahush Khubalkar, AGP for respdts Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 4th May 2009 1. Heard Mr Sunil Manohar, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr Nahush Khubalkar, learned Asst. Government Pleader for respondents. 2. In paragraphs 4 and 5 of the affidavit dated 1.4.2009 filed by Joint Director of Higher Education (respondent no.3), it is mentioned that the proposal of the petitioners for grant-in-aide could not be decided by the Cabinet/ Competent Authority because of imposition of code of conduct by the Election Commissioner. It is also mentioned in the affidavit that as soon as period of code of conduct comes to an end, issue about extending grant-in-aid to the computer science course run by the petitioners will be placed before the Cabinet/Competent Authority for necessary consideration and decision. 3. In the circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition and expect that 2 the decision be taken as early as possible after the period of Code of Conduct comes to an end. Judge Judge hsj