spb/- 1 wp931-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 931 OF 2011 Behram Kali Mehta ... Petitioner . V/s. 1. The Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents. --- Mr. H.S. Shreepad Murthy i/by Ms. Pinky Bhansali for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : P. V. HARDAS & M.N.GILANI,JJ. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2011. PC: 1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for the following reliefs : “(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or Direction directing the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take forthwith an action in accordance with the law against the Respondent No.4 for (i) filing false declaration, (ii) carrying on the business in violation of VISA terms and conditions and (iii) involving in various criminal and her business activities and to investigate the matter and to report the same to this Hon’ble Court and for appropriate prosecution in accordance with Law; (b) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the Order of grant of anticipatory bail granted by the Ld. Sessions Judge in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1550 of 2010”. spb/- 2 wp931-11.sxw 2 In respect of the prayer clause (a) to the petition, the learned APP states that the C.R.No.228 of 2010 for the offence punishable under sections 176, 470, 490 and 420 read with section 17 of the Foreigners Act and section 31 of Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 has been registered against the respondents against whom the petitioner has complained. In respect of the complaint of the petitioner dated 28.02.2011, the learned APP states on instructions that the police would examine the said complaint and determine whether an offence is made out and would accordingly take steps available in law. The learned APP further states that the decision on the said complaint would be communicated to the petitioner. We accept the aforesaid statement as an undertaking to the court and in the light of the said statement, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition. 3 The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. In respect of the relief under prayer clause (b), the petitioner may avail such remedies as are available to the petitioner in law. [M.N.GILANI,J.] [P.V. HARDAS, J.]