1W Q^ff- ) (^ ^ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5^6 /2010. PETITIONER: ^ Nandji Dahariya, son of Shri Pukram Dahariya, aged about 52 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Priniary School Baghmalla, Block Bhilaigarh, Education District Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents ^ <A2 ^^S7 ^^\y ^^^/ -^ ';.••• ^? '^/ s<r ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 2. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasuiy and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA .1 [C—78 W^T ^FT ktl1ch WT ^TT^T^HT^F NI^^TT^RT^ 'ysr "qi<fl^f^r, ®Ti1-Hli<o, fc<di<!-i^< M..P...c^.^^..^.^l^200 ^1T^¥TTT^F (1Gti^<it?) ^HW^I^^n^T SB : HON'BLB MR JUSTICBJPSaTINKBRraWAKBR 01.10.2010 Shri C,J.K.Rao, counsel J^ Shri Vaibhav GovexdhaB., tt>r )n4r advadice aimatit)n Counsel for fhe petition^r entitled to beneiGit of two haviag passed B,T.I. examiiiati^] own cost. It is subimtted tliat petition is no longer res integr^i decided by fhe Hon'ble Saacena Vs. State of M.P. & Supr^aie Chris. submits that the petitioner is iacrements on account of he before his appoiatDient at his pie issue iavolved ia. fhe present and fhe saine has been finally Court in. fhe case of Asha 2009 (IIIJMPJR (8C) 59. It is ftrrther submitfced siixular view ia its order datedl 6257/2008, Coimsel for the order dated 29.4.2010 passe^ wherein relyiug upon fhe judgi^ case ofAsha Saxena (supra) ia anofher Writ Appeal No, issued for consideration of iiicreixients as per circular of Madhya Pradesh, after petltion. Counsel for the State would also be considered on fh|< ^Tqf^zft^f THTT^f ^ f^^ Tf^R^R ir^iRR 3n^T the petitioner. P.L. for the State. tbat p4titioner fhis Court has also taken a 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. further submits fhat the in Writ Appeal No. 124/2009, offhe Supreme Court m fhe the order passed by fhis Couri 187/2009, directions hseve been case for gntnt of two advance 21.9.1974 issued by the State of fhe facts pleaded in fhe judg^ent aAd th|e dat^d venjSjcation s^bmits that case of the petitioner ^ame lines, /f^ ^^ XI.HC—78 ^T^T ^T ^^ ^TI ^t^Y^rHN^ ^pqR'flWfl^ ^sr •^i^xn^, ^•(-I^KO, f^TRTy J:.£:..^2....&-..S3^/«^ '200 3TI^T TT^T (^qt^^T) ^TOR^1td3^T In view of above, fhe direction to the respondent petitioner for grant of two ad^ dated 21.9.1974 issued by verificatiou of the facts pleade4 eight weeks fironi today. ^Fri<?riN 'ETFH^ff ^ f^st <F»i^.l< ^aff^TaTT^T petition is disposed of with a aufhorities to decide the claim offhe l^aace increments as per circular ffc|e State of Madhya Px^idesh after ia fhe petition wifhiii a period of Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge r