IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51269 of 2007 NOOR MOHAMMAD …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. LADO 3. ISHRAT JAHAN @ ASHRAT KHATOON 4. SANO @ ALI FAISAL 5. MALIKA …OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioner :Mr.Ram Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the o.ps. :Mr.D.K.Sinha, Sr. Advocate, :Mr.Md. Anis Akhtar & :Mr.Arif Siddique ----------- 05. 05.10.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Present application has been filed by the informant seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in favour of o.p.nos. 2 to 5 by learned Sessions Judge, Patna. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a wrong submission was made before the court for seeking bail. Learned counsel for the opposite parties, on the contrary, submits that order impugned was passed in presence of the counsel representing the informant. It is contended that the occurrence, as per the prosecution case, had taken place in the year 2005, whereas the FIR was lodged in the year 2007. It is further submitted that there is no allegation of misuse of privilege of bail. This Court on going through materials on record is satisfied that no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail is made out. The application is accordingly dismissed. At this stage, both the parties submit that the case is 2 now pending trial after commitment. Both the counsels assure the Court that they would fully co-operate in expeditious disposal of the trial. Let the aforesaid stand of the parties be recorded. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )