IN THE HIGH covRT OF CHHATTIseARH A1- BILASPUR WRIT PETITIog3go. 3“”3 /200'-6 PETITIONER: son of Shri Sadaram Paikr'a, aged abouf 35 years, OccupaTion~$ervice, Presenfly posTed as Assistant Veterinary Officer, Veterinary Hospital, Lakhanpur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. t/Safyanamyan Pai km, Vs ESPONDENTS: /;., State of Chhattisgarh Through; the Secretary, Department of Veterinary, Mantralya D.K.$. Bhawan, ‘ Rai'pur. }The Collector, Sarguja, (C.G.) 3. The District Veterinary ’Officer, Lakhanpur, District Sarguja (6.6.) 4.Bhuneshwar Das, Assistant / Veterinary Officer, Chalgali, Pratappur, District Sarguja (C.G.). ‘ Wim- PETITION uNDER ARTIcLEs 226 & 227 or THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE wan/walts DIRECTIONs Etc. IN \THE NATURE OF MANDAMus cEiu-IOPAPI ANNOR $ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATUR R E c AFK HIEH COURT OF CHHfATTISQARH £1" BELASPUR Wr‘i? Pe‘ri‘r'iwu is) No. §813 of 20G6 Pe'rifioner Safyammycm Paakm Versus Re$pondems .Sm‘re of Ciqhaf’risgar‘h & O‘rhers: $ingig @m’n: Hon‘bie Mr. Jusu‘ice Sg‘mh K Agrmhgw. S’nri Sumi Tr‘ipa‘i’im, Aa‘vewfé fm‘ f§ae pai‘f’wngr. $§nr§ Sumazaf Verna, Pane? iawyer' far The raspcmdenfg No. 1 "i‘c 3%Smm. 0 Q§§i§ (mam on 2?“ of Ombgr, 29%) Tha §o!!owiwg order of ‘fhe Cour? was passed by Swish K. Agwihm'ri, 3. 1. The pe‘i'iiiomr was empioyad as Assismm Vekrimry Officer and payed a? \fe‘mrimry Hospmd, Lakhmpur, Dis+r§c?-5urguja. 8y om‘ier dafed 77.2006 (Annexure W9) The pati‘?iomr aicng wh‘h ofher eigh? gersons were fransferr‘edfrom (ma place ‘i’o m‘ker pkxce due ‘m admir‘.i$+rafive exigency. The. pawbner wa$ fransfgrmd from Ve‘mrinary Hasp 3m}, Lakhcmpur, D'iswicf fiumu‘a a J é‘o Cirsaig(31%, Pm‘mppur, wif’rzin ”me same dis-rric‘r. 2. §eing aggrievad, ‘r‘na pa?i?§oner had fi$ed a wrh‘ pa?i?iem bamg W9. Na 4157/200é in 'rh%s Co'ur‘i'. This Court af‘rem hearing “rim pe‘r%‘?ioner‘, permiffed #ha pa‘rHioner w make a represenm’rion ‘m respondenf No. Z/Ccliem‘or, Surguja cmd ‘rhe responders”: N0. 2 was sirecfed ‘ro decide The rzpms‘anmfic‘n Mi’hin a pariad of éO days from i'he daTe of recaiw of '?he represenfa?ien. Th§s Courtfur‘rher ‘ )b. @ gramed s‘my of ‘r‘ne effec'f and operm“mn of fhe impugned Wansfer order- da‘fed 7.7.2006 fill The reprasan'm‘?ion of 'rhe paifiomr was decidad. 3 The responcien? No. Z, by erder cia‘i'ed 6.10.290é (yQnnexura P/8), affer‘ having ccnsidered ail The. issues mi$ed befare him in ‘i’ha represenm‘rion, cama to ‘rha cenclus‘mn Tim? 's‘hare is n0 reason To made! ‘i‘ne earlier ordar da'iad 7.7.2006 wnmxure W6). 3:? was furihx observed irz fhe said order ‘ma‘i i ‘mg 5 pe‘iifionar commi‘h‘ec: a 1 mi$conduci as provigiigd wider 'i’he Chha‘h‘isgar‘n Civii ServiczaS (Coriéum‘) Ruies, 1965 by makiiag ra’preserziaiiom ‘ihroagh ‘ihe Nairaisa‘ewwhich is no? parmissibiz in law. 4. Tim gafi‘ricner has fiiad przsem wrif pe‘ii‘rian impugwing The ordai- dn‘i‘aé 6.’i0.2006 (Amexur'e W8) passed by ihe resgondem? ND. 2 on his represam‘aiim. Tha scia can‘ianiian sf the paiiiisner i$ €ha‘i’ Tha peiiiionzr was m earlier imrisferrad om 31.3.2965 from Kai‘ka "m pmsan? raiace Lakincmpur‘. The pziiiiomer fur’rher submii'iad inn? i ma i gaaiiiiamr was p<>$"reci L1? Ke‘i‘ka sinca his apggoin‘imam and Ti'ierea‘§?er for iha firs? ‘rime he was ‘i'raagfarmci an “1.E.200§ and “this is ihe secoad frans‘fer. Sima iiie. second "é'mnsfer‘ crder was passed af'iar u parim‘ of 10 mmihs, i? amoums i'o frequen? imnsfar cmd aS $uch “ring same is maia iide exarcisg of gowai“. ,.#m {I g\ a w,‘ "i haw Zaaard karma? coungzl §02~ ?he pa"?§'rio'ner 031d gerusgd ‘?‘aa records appendad 'm Th3 wrh‘ pei‘ifaom‘ 7. '{ha confe-m‘rion of ‘rha pe'a‘i‘fizmer *{hw i’he second tramfar ardar af‘var a periad 0‘? ‘19 mewhs amouafs To frequem‘ Wamfer §s fr'we‘xous and 141w same. dasewe$ “m be: dismissed on n‘he simwa groui‘zd ‘r‘hm fmquem‘ ’{ransfar means sevgrcd wansfaw WHhin c: shar’r span 6f “fame. I”: i3 no? fhe case where frequan? Wangfar ‘ms beaa madei as game ‘me @po'm‘rmen? of The Qwifiomr +0 fine post. , ‘Fna “firs? ’rmnsfar erdgr was passed a‘f’mr a period of eigifn‘ years and 'rhis is The sewmi wawfar om‘ari which was $a$szd ‘iua ”to admimifrmféve axigz'ncy aiewg wi'i'h sex/am} ofhar persens‘ 8; I Mve my? foLmd any iafir‘miw or irragumw ,I 'm fhe order dm'ed $102006 {Annaxure Pig) éa3$ehi by fha resgaomdem No: 2/Co§§ec?0ri wherein “Fm CoiiecTcr has considered all Th9, mims raised 'm The repmsen‘m‘kion and has passed reasomble, jusi‘ amé groper ordain Thus’ There i$ no mari'r in fhe case. 9. I} §s wen se‘mw prmcipk of km 1’hcd’ ‘i’rcmsfer is cm inciden’r 0‘? servica and i? is “Fm“ ‘fhe empioyar it) deaide as ‘m where a pariiculm’ officar/amg:3i9yaa be pas?ed keeping in view pubiic iii'iarasi: as wali &.s admiriisi'mi‘iva exigency. This Cauri‘ has; iimi‘i‘m‘ urigciic’rimq *m iMer‘fgre iH ‘i’he. imasfer maiifgr arid "ihis Cour? am imer‘fa/re mix; in This casa oi: waved maia iiida, mwaompa’rama m? gui‘i’iwiw pwgimg “he ircms‘kr erdw and immfar ardar iris"? bang ‘m cei'iffjrmiw wiiri’i i i we ruies cmd ragu‘xa‘?ion$. The pa? mam <1"? mm phcg, . gazrmii’i’ed TO ma erg3sa2"); *‘m &%aga, '1"? ia m? n a, 1%}. {As c; mam? cad 25m“ ‘(ha ab 0’? mar}? am§ €$ accard‘mgiy dams w. if'aomriampicyag came? ba é? 'rhis axam'a'm m‘sidi‘w a"? :‘wg gai‘am is; davcia‘ avg s'ma'eci magmas, 5‘3‘3.Ml \ Satish sap K. Agnihotn ‘ Judge wad. Na om‘xar a5 to ca f fm‘zver, by Cam“? Grilar‘ss. 1”ha Jrmm‘f’ar.