IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2006 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 764 of 2006(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11459/2006 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- ABDUL GAFOOR, S/O. ISUPPU ANJILATH, BENGALAM HOUSE, POST BENGALAM, KANHANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KASARAGOD. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LAKSHMI RANI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J =========================== R.P. NO. 764 Of 2006 ============================ Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2006 O R D E R If Ext.P2 application was considered even before the judgment dated 12.06.06, the directions in that judgment will stand modified to that extent. This means that the needful following the grant of concurrence shall be carried out and the renewal, if granted, shall be endorsed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. SJ