^^^^S^SsS^!^^^ p .cS'-?- ^ 4-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No.S^g^ /2006 SlNGLi PETITIONER B.C.Jain, S/o. Shri Bhaiyalal Jain aged about 59 years, Occupation - S.D.O. R/o. Sub- Division No.l, Surajpur Division No.l, Ambikapur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS , ,\0^.....^<^ panchayat ^•^y^ '^ Developme /z7?"i,^€--'"^ ...-••!^^??"' ^-••^y ^yy ">-" :--»-, ^o JlAJ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of and Rural ^- Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary Ri-u-al Engineering Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Chief Engineer Rural Engineering Services, Raipur (C.G-). /^ 4. Executive Engineer Rural Engineering Sendces, Division Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.). ^^^SS^SWRrT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. n €^/€^ ^"" lii. Ij 'y; it; XI-HC-78 *ll*ldl sh+licft 3:^'.:qT2n?ra', a-rfly'ls, fqiniuy .W? ^,^^^6€ riS' W[ 200 3TT^?T><a<*> (li^!^sl'^iiT) an^T^Tf^ifq; OT3n^Tst)1 -;Y SRirarHfN'sn^T 7.8.2006 Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. Advoccct petitioner. Shri 6. K. Beriwal, Dy. Adv. 6^1 Heard. By the pr-esent petition the order dated 30.6.2006 (Annexure Rural Engineering Services Oepartt'tient to his parent depar'tment i.e. Water Resources Department. petitioner has challenged his repatriation P-1) whereby he has been repatriated by Learned counsel for the peti^ verge of retirement and he has to ioner submits that the petitioner is on the make arran9ements in order to settle at for. With the direction aforesaid Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.26 Certified copy as per rules. ^rqfefft wraY ^'te^-rf^fOTc ^aTf^iTsn^T with Smt. Hamida Siddique, Adv. for the neral for respondents on adyance copy. jQbdpur, therefore, he needs at lejist t»»omonths' time to settte, therefore, the r'elieving time of the petitioner ^e extended. Considering the fact that tljie impu9ned transfer ordef wos made on 30.6.2006, the respondents are dire^ted to give at least one month's time from today i.e. up to 7* September, 20(^6 to the patitioner, so that he can make drr'an9ement3 for repor'ting in th^; parent department provided that the petitioner yve an undertokin9 befor^e respondent No.3 that he ufill not request for further extension of time an^ wil! get himself relieved positively by 7.9.2006, failing which the petition^r will not be entitled for protection asked the petition stands disposed of. ?3/06 also stands disposed of.: .$ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge •<" 'h,1 /n