IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11562 of 2010 RABI KUMAR @ DILIP KUMAR, SON OF UMESH RAI @ MUNNA RAY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PAKARA, P.S. NAUGACHHIA, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR…PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Sumiran Giri, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ------- 2. 30.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the F.I.R. was lodged against four unknown persons, however, the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused, Gautam , recorded by the police, wherein it is alleged that it was the petitioner, who acted as a broker during the sale of the motorcycle in favour of Dr. Prahlad. Learned counsel submits that there is no direct or indirect allegation against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Rabi Kumar @ Dilip Kumar, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Pasraha P.S. Case No.49/09, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)