WmLf— - ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (sYNoHléé. OF 2011 PETITIONER .Saukhi Lal Kurre S/o Shri Ghurua Das Kurre, aged about 40 years, post of Upper Division Teacher, Working as Govt, Middle School ’Jhorki Para, Block Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) " VERSUS RESPS ONDENT State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, .Distt. Raipur (CG) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, Distt. Korba (CG) 4. Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer Pali, Distt. Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:- 37a WW, whim; W “£L3‘-& 200 1mmmm 311%“ m (Wag) 1 mm ma 3mm War Wh‘ 1§ Fm? I‘m a? aim m 3.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PHTINKER DIWAKER 03.08.201 1 Shri Amit Kumar, couns 61 for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the Stats. Counsel for the peu'ti entitled to bencm of two ad‘ having passed B.T.I. exami n in the year 1993 before his appointngent at his own co 1t is submitted that the issue involved in the present petiti is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena state of M.P. & 01's. 2009 (ImMmR (so) 59. It is further submitted t this Court has also taken a similar View in its order date 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the order dated 29.420 124/2009, wherein relying u on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case ofAsha by this Court in another Wn' Appeal Nov 87/2009, dixections have been issued for conside tion of the case for grant of two ular dated 21.9.1974 issued by after verification of the facts r submits that tho petitioner is e incmments on account of he passed in Writ Appeal NO. a (supra) and the order passed. advance increments as per the State of Madhya Prade pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State s1 bmits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on t e same lines. o } ‘e c n 'o s . o. V . .a 1 S n . , c' s XI-HC-—78 3a WW, mug, Tm < “mmm IFL 2oo ané-w m (@ww) r WWW wmm mm?! amt In View of above, the pet dimcu'on to the respondent autht the petitioncr for grant of two cimular dated 21.9.1974 issum Pradesh after verification of the Within a period of four months k0} It is made clear that this ( opinion on merits of the case would be at liberty to decide the with law. ,. c manta 'qrnrc‘t 1i feta than %a‘i§maném ition is disposed of with a )rim'es to decide the claim of advance increments as per 1 by the State of Madhya facts pleaded in the petition n today. )ourt has not expressed any aid the authority concerned same strictly in accordance r Sd/-- Pritinker Diwaker Judge