IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO.155 OF 2005 Ganesh Banzoplast Ltd. & Ors. ...Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondent ...... Mr.A.S.Khan for Applicants. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. Ms.Leena Sapra for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. It is not in dispute that in all, nine cases are pending between the same parties for offence of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Counsel for both parties fairly state that it will be in the interest of the parties that all the cases are tried before one : 2 : Court. 3. It is agreed that all the nine cases be tried before the Court of 4th Metropolitan Magistrate, Girgaum, Mumbai, where at least two matters have already proceeded and become part-heard. Accordingly, Application is allowed by directing transfer of all the nine cases referred to in prayer clause (i) of the Application before the 4th Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, Girgaum in Mumbai, who shall dispose of the same in accordance with law. 4. Application disposed of accordingly. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.