IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 SA.No. 718 of 1996(B) AS.185/1990 OF DISTRICT COURT, KOTTAYAM OS.447/1986 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANACHERRY APPELLANT: APPELLANT: 2ND DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------- VANIKA VAISYA SANGHAM BRANCH NO.17, MORKULANGARA, REP. BY ITS PRESENT SECRETARY, SRI.P.K.RAMACHANDRAN CHETTIYAR, CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY SRI.SABU GEORGE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANT NO.3: -------------------------------------------------- 1. C.FRANCIS, H.NO.60, WARD XXX PANDANILAM VEEDU, VAZHAPPALLY EAST VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY. 2. VASUDEVAN, PLAMOODU HOUSE, HOUSE NO.130, WARD NO.29, VAZHAPPALLY EAST VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY. 3. CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, CHANGANACHERRY. R3 BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- S.A. NO. 718 OF 1996 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th January, 2008 JUDGMENT In spite of several opportunities having been given to take steps to complete service, no steps have been taken by the appellant. On 12.12.2007, ten days' time was granted as a last chance to cure the defects. Still the defects are not cured. The Second Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for default. However, if the appellant gets ready to cure the defects and files an application for restoration of the appeal within one month from today, the same will be considered. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- S.A..NO. 718 OF 1996 JUDGMENT 4th January, 2008 ----------------------------------------------------