IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-16406 of 2010 Date of decision : 17.09.2010 Sukhwant Kaur ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent-State along with Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel on the instructions of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 has submitted that the respondents have only initiated the security proceedings against both the parties interested in the land in dispute, on the complaint of Sukhwant Kaur-petitioner and Satnam Singh, in discharge of their official duties. They have not interfered with the land in dispute in any other manner. In this view of the categoric statement of learned State counsel, this petition becomes infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such. However, it is made clear that, if any, of the respondents interfered in any manner with regard to the property in dispute pertaining to the parties, then petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh petition for appropriate order. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge September 17, 2010 naresh.k