1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.8826 of 2011 P.Manikkam .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Inspector of Police, Omatchikulam Police Station, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, South Kaval Koodal Street, Madurai-625 001. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's civil right and consequently direct the third respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry upon the complaint given by Chitra Devi, wife of Jeyakanthan. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's civil right and consequently direct the third respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry upon the complaint given by Chitra Devi, wife of Jeyakanthan. 2. Heard Mr.V.Manoharan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindna, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's civil right and consequently to direct the third respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. Except stating in paragraph 10 of the affidavit that the third respondent called the petitioner for enquiry, there appears to be no material to show that the petitioner is being harassed by the third respondent. The entire case is civil in nature. The petitioner, if really aggrieved, could have made a complaint to the superior authority https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 viz., the Superintendent of Police setting out his grievance instead of rushing to the Court for relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. There is not even a protest by the petitioner to the Superintendent of Police or to the Inspector of Police concerned that the matter is purely civil in nature and the petitioner is being harassed by the third respondent. This Court is not inclined to consider the petitioner's request merely on conjectures and surmises. 6. Finding no merits, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Inspector of Police, Omatchikulam Police Station, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, South Kaval Koodal Street, Madurai-625 001. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.26874 Ssl SR : 17.08.2011 : 2p/5c W.P(MD)No.8826 of 2011 08.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/