IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6965 of 2010() ----------------------------- CMP.955/2010 of J.M.F.C.-III,THRISSUR CRIME No.704/2010 of MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT .................... APPLICANT/ACCUSED :- --------------------------------- ANIL DAVIS, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.DAVIS, KUNNAMKADA HOUSE, KOORKANCHERY VILLAGE, KANIMANGALAM DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :- ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE S.I.OF POLICE, MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, THIRSSUR DISTRICT. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................. Bail Application No. 6965 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated: 8th day of November, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 1st accused in Crime No.704/2010 of Mannuthy Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 395 I.P.C, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 16.9.2010. The petitioner was arrested on 18.9.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the petitioner is involved in 11 other cases including a murder case and 2 KAAPA Act cases. In this case he was styling himself as a gunda and the complainant was robbed of cash worth Rs.8,000/- on 16.9.2010. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb