1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4786 OF 2010 (Smt. Vandanabai Gautam Meshram vs. Divisional Commissioner & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 29, 2010. Heard Shri Pavan Rahulkar with Shri Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Choudhari, learned counsel for respondents No. 4 to 10. The contention of learned counsel is, motion for no confidence was not proposed and seconded by anybody. The other contention is, the petitioner was not given any opportunity of hearing and the incorrect grounds are looked into while passing motion. Shri Choudhari, learned counsel relies upon finding recorded by the authorities to urge that there is no substance in the petition. Mrs. Deshpande, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3 also supports the impugned order. The proceedings show that the petitioner was present in the meeting, she has participated in it and attempted to explain the alleged grounds. Thus, the contention that the motion was neither moved nor seconded is totally irrelevant. The correctness or otherwise of the grounds given is also not relevant. The 2 correctness of proceedings as recorded is not in dispute. I, therefore, do not find anything wrong with the concurrent orders passed by the lower authorities. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.