BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.10685 of 2011 C.PONNUSAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W.C.I.D, DINDIGUL UNIT, DINDIGUL CR NO.NO KNOWN ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The Petitioner, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for the alleged offences under Sections 406, 408, 420, 479-A, 467, 471 and 120(b) of IPC, has come forward with this Petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. Though the petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 406, 408, 420, 479-A, 467, 471 and 120(b) of IPC, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that neither a case is registered nor a petition is pending with the respondent and the apprehension of arrest is baseless. 3. Considering the above rival submissions and since the apprehension of arrest is baseless, the Petition is dismissed. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W.C.I.D, DINDIGUL UNIT, DINDIGUL +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.35922 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10685 of 2011 Date :18/10/2011 SMA/19.10.2011/4C/1P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/