IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.26686 of 2006 Between: Syed Jameel Ahmed. … Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad and two others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Ch.Janardhan Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home. This Court made the following: ORDER:- Feeling aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.1 in disposing of the petitioner’s representation dated 28-11-2006, this Writ Petition is filed. Sri Ch.Janardhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that after receiving the notice from this Court, respondent No.1 disposed of the petitioner’s representation and that a separate Writ Petition was filed by the petitioner questioning the order passed by him. He, therefore, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.34284 of 2006 is also dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:30-6-2009 MNR