1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3004 OF 2006 Ozone Finance & Investments Pvt.Ltd. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Leelaben Damodarddas Katrecha & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr.N.G.Raut for the Plaintiff. Mr.Alok Bagla i/b.M/s.Bagla Dandekar & Co.for Defendant Nos.1 to 3. Mr.H.C.Mehta i/b.Mehta & Co. for Defendant No.4. Mr.A.H.Khatri i/b.Khatri Legal Venture for Defendant No.7. Mr.S.J.Gonjari i/b.S.K.Legal & Associates for Defendant No.8. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 7th SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.- The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly by consent prepared Consent Terms between the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 1 to 4, 7 and 9. The parties have accordingly signed alongwith their respective advocates. There are no objections with regards to the identification, authorization and signatures. The learned counsel appearing for the parties make statements that the present Consent Terms is well within the framework of law and the record. 2 2. Defendant No.6 is present who is director of Respondent No.5. They have also no objection with regard to the Consent Terms. Defendant No.8 have also no objection to the same. 3. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. 4. The parties have already agreed and consented for the undertakings which are 13 to 17, therefore those are accepted. 5. The suit is disposed of in view of this Consent Terms with liberty. 6. In view of this the Notice of Motion Nos. 364 of 2006 and 1625 of 2007 are also disposed of. 7. The court fee, if any, be refund in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)