."i:^ ;f HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASFUR PETITIONER WRTTPKnTIONNo^834 of2002 Shibu Joseph- S/o K.J.Joseoh. aged about 32 vears- R'o Railwav Ouarter No. 1017/3. Constnietion Colony, Tarbahar, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chliattisgarh Through Secrgtary, Home Mhiistty D.ICBhawafL Raipur (C.G.) 2. SuperiiitendentofPolice, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Sub-Inspector (Slifi V.S.Chandel) Police Station, Civi! Line, Bilaspur (C.G.) PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA Present: Sliri Keshav Gu-Dta. Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Shashank Tliakur, PaiieS Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 & 2 Sm'i Lokesa S.ingl'i, Advocate for the rsspondeat No. 3. ?B (Passed OB 18"' day of October, 2008) 3v this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the effect that criiTiinai proceedings a.saivst the liable and responsible persons be iuitiated and farther grant ofa sum ofRs. 5 lacs as compensation to the petitioner. Sfcia... The indisputable facts, in brief ars that the petitioner, while travelling on a iriotor-cvcle met with an accident with a truck as a result of which he sustamed serious iniuries on his riAt leg, risht hand and left side ofhis head. Accordins to the petitioner. he was a eonstable in Border Security Force. Accordiae to leamed couasel appearing for the peti.tioner, no action has beea taken against the persons who hrt the petitioner causii'ig serious injuries to ths body ofthe petitioner. Sl'ui Shashank ThaSair; learaed Panel Advocate appearmg for the respondent No. 1 and 2 submits fiat a fhe case has already been reaistered as Crime No. 740/2002 at Poliee Station, Civil Lines, Bilaspur under section 279 and 227 of the Indian Penal Code and challan has also beea filed before the Chief Judicia] Maeisti-ate, Bilaspur, on 24.12.2002. yj .^' -?. ^s^i.s-^^^^ In view of the above, tiie praver of the petitioner that criminal case be registered against the persons who were involved in the accident has aiready been coB-iplied with. Wifh respect to srant of compeasation, t3ie petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to appropriate proceedings, if it is permissible underthe provisions oflaw. In view ofthe foresoins, the oetition stands disposed of. N'o order asto costs. ConseQuentlv. M(WiP No.. 1838/2002, apDJication for erant of ad-interim reiief. staads disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge q:3