IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.130 of 2010 1. SRI RAMJEE PRASAD, S/O- SRI JAMUN PRASAD. 2. SRI RAMBRIKSH RAI, S/O- LATE MADAN GOPE. 3. SMT. SAVITRI DEVI, W/O- LATE SHARIFAN RAI. ALL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- MUNNACHAK, KANKARBAGH, P.S.- PATRANAGAR, DISTRICT- PATNA. :---PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 5. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DIVISION-I, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, KANKARBAGH, PATNA :---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 30.03.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are seeking review of the orders of this Court bearing no. 04 dated 19.4.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 5668 of 2010, Annexure-1 on the ground that in view of the statement made by the counsel for the State recorded in Paragraph 2 of the said order petitioners may be dispossessed from the lands-in-question even without acquisition of the said lands. Such apprehension of the petitioners, in my opinion, is wholly misconceived as having noticed the statement of the petitioners in Paragraph-1 and the statement of the State authorities in Paragraph-2 of the said order this Court in Paragraph-3 of the order directed the authorities to initiate a proceeding under the Land Encroachment Act as and when they decide to lay the road over the lands-in-question so as to enable the authorities to confirm whether the lands-in-question have been acquired. In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to review the aforesaid order and the review application is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)