PETITIONER CI‘.1‘vi.F. Ni). APPLICATION UND‘F‘R SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMI‘IAL PROCEDURE A1 llD‘JFXKr‘l Al EILADYUK 3mgia gem-h 9 kw» /2011 Arindam Das S/o Naba Kumar Das Aged—about 35 years, caste—Karmakar, station— Police RESPONDENT State Of Chhattisgarh Through— Station House officer, Police station— Pali, Distt.— Korba [C.G.] /V ,V Ea “s a W‘ a) Q f “"W f“ «M Rajgangpur, Distt.— Sundargarh Wigi W (LL. 2”“ M {Orissa1 @ Versus @ Em W: ) @Fwm farm (r1 m ##3/1’ §i 330 WE?! $1 1%:«W' amm arms wawmM if fa??? “GEN a: ”Em mm B Hon’bie Shrl Manmdra Mo n Shrwastava S J 28-1 1 -2011 Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, nsei for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Gupta, Panel L wyer for the State. Heard. This petition under Sectio 482 CrPC has been fled by the petitioner in exercise of opportunity granted t revrve the petition Vide order dated 14/7/2011 passed in CrMP No 39OI11 Learned counsei for the p titioner submits that the vehicle alieged to be used in the commission of offenc is owned by the petitioner, who is the registered owner of the vehicle. He further s bmits that he is not an accused in the case and the allegations are against the dr er who is alleged to have misused the vehicle for alleged commission of offence Learned counsel for the petaioner submits that the vehicle has remained in custo y since 12/1 2/2010 and the same is likeiy to be junked. Learned counsel for the' etitioner submits that in the trial, till date, not a single witness has been exami by the prosecution and the trial is therefore likely to take time. Lastly, it is su mitted that the petitioner is prepared to abide by such conditions as may be impos d on him in the event of reiease of hisvehicle. On the other hand, lear counsel for the State submits that me vehicle was found carrying contraband ( anja). He submits that even there is delay in triat, taking into consideration that he vehicle was used for transportation of Ganja, prayer for interim custody is liable o be rejected. Taking into consideration e submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also taking into consi eration that the petitioner is the registered owner and he is not an accused in the c se and further taking into consideration that the vehicle has remained in custod Since 12i12/2010 and the police m all the rm...” UmmH-wl S/MO- -2/.ZOtl -—1 50 000 u n n aréwr wm am mi?! awn? Wwmm awfm m'rm ff *E’m fWTrjk % W am! #2? occasions. had opportunity to can further taking into consideratior petitioner that there is delay in tridl and not a sinie witness has been examined till i and is accordingly allowed. vehicle shall be granted te the petitioner by the s and conditions as may be thought tit in the y out investigationjnre’lation to thevehicle and the submission of learned counsel ‘for the i l i , ~._..- L an ’em data games, nmmHm-nt‘s/Momz/zo l 1-——1 ,5o,ooo. is aliegation of repetition of offence or misuse of stody shalt be liable to be cancelled. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 1m rm: tv @‘rnwrd W“W c m 2:310 m tam tweet) date, the petition has to be allowei The interim custody of the iearned trial Court on suoh term » circumstances ofthe case. ‘ it is m "d3 clear that if there the vehiclerthe order of interim cu