1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.240 OF 2010 ( ANIL KESHAORAO KHONDE..VS..PANDURANG DASHRATH BHANSE & 4 OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.A.A.Kathane, Advocate with Appellant. Mr. R.R. Thakre, Advocate with Respondents No.2 to 5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2011. The parties have filed an application (C.A.W. No.413 of 2011) for recording of the compromise in First Appeal No.240 of 2010. The application is signed by the appellant as well as respondents No.2 to 5. The respondent No.1 has not signed the compromise pursis as he is reported to be absconding since more than seven years and his whereabouts are not known. A Complaint in that regard has also been filed before the Police Authorities and the certificate that whereabouts of the respondent No.1 are not known for more than seven years is issued by the Police Authorities. 2. The parties i.e. appellant and respondents No. 2 to 5 are personally present in the Court today. 3. The counsel for the parties have identified their respective clients. This Court had made a query to the appellant as well as respondents No.2 to 5 about their readiness and willingness to record the compromise on the basis of the terms made in the application for the compromise 2 and all of them have answered in the affirmative. 4. I have perused the terms and conditions mentioned in the application. The terms and conditions appear to be just and reasonable. In view of the aforesaid facts, it is necessary to dispose of the first appeal on the basis of the application for the compromise. 5. The first appeal is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the compromise. Consequently, the application No. 413 of 2011 is also disposed of. 6. The decree be drawn in accordance with the terms of the compromise. In the facts of the case, there would be no order as to costs. JUDGE RR..