IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 593 of 2011. Decided on: 07.07.2011. ___________________________________________ Raksha Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 4. None for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General submits that as per instructions imparted to him by Mr. Chaman Thakur, order dated 26th June, 2011 is withdrawn. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondent No.2 to pass fresh orders after considering the reply filed by respondent No.5. The Director of Higher Education shall pass a self-contained and speaking order. Since respondent No.5 is at the verge of retirement, her case shall be dealt with leniently by the Director of Education. However, in case any decision adverse to respondent No.5 is taken, she has the liberty to assail the same. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 07, 2011. (sck).