IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1C.G) w.P. (s) No. g$622 12008 /‘ Kashi Ram Verma, S/o Shri Uday Singh Verma, aged about 49 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School ,, PETITIONER £9 / «9 Jiw XQ‘ §/\ ? edpar Bazaar, Block‘ Qt c}%\6\\«‘§ Takhatpur, District—BHaspur W t (C.G.) VERSUS ../ RESPONDENTS :1., State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) K 2. The Assistant Commissioner Tribal & Welfare Department ~ at "\ Bilaspur (co) 3. Block Education Officer Takhatpur, District-Biiaspur (C.G.) “x 4. District Education Officer, ilaspur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 F THE CONSTITUION OFINDIA PARTICULARS OF THVE PETITIOER N -As mentioned in the cause titie. x M B & HIG COURTOF CH ATTI$GA :Bl PUR Vr_ Kas Ram Venna, sic. Shr 'uaay singh Verma, aged about w year, Asistant Teacher, avemeni Priry choi, Medpar azaar, Biock Takhaip, Distric Bilaspur (0G). ' Versus 1) tate of Chhattisgam, through secretar, S y Education Department, DKS. Bhawan, Ripur (CG). 2) The Assistant Cummissione Tribai a. Weffare Department, Biiaspur CG). 3) ock Edution Officer, Takhatpur, District Biiaspur (CG). " ce r. A 6 ) 4) District Education Qfi‘ir, Biiaspu (Writ Petition under rticie 22 of the Constitution of indie. SB: Hon’hie Mr. Sadsh K. gnihtri, . s: r una a counseor i peonr, Shr Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advoca Genemi with Smt Suniia Jain, Panei Lawyer for the Stat. ORAL ORDR E (Passed on 16‘” day ofJune, 20w; With consent of ieard cunsei appearing for the partie, the matter is hear finaiiy. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits hat the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 28-1—8 (Annexure P11 on a iixed pay soaie of R150/- or a period of two years. After ompletion of two years probation, the petitioner was granted regular pay soaie. He further submits that the issue invoived in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitied to regutar pay scaie with effect from the date of initiai appointment or after compietion of probation period. 3) The issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai. Jabaipur in O.ANo.2745189 ( Madhukant Yadu and 56 V_§t Petition (S) No. 2902 of 200§ Petitioner m i s s Gm ma So B ur t Respondents a ( r, Bl ca Ao J Preent Shi Ki Ds, if ffe titie i te e ne o s d t 191 ) s. f c \22— ‘ ”? Q others Vs State of MP. a others), wherein it was he'd that the similariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the em that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4) in view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitioner’s ease, if he stands on the same footings as per order dated 248—1 992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal! Jabalpur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 (Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequemiy confirmed by order dated" 3—1 4994 passed by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (C’wii) No. 6892/93 and grant reiief accordingly. 5) ln view of foregoing, the petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. mMm. e m . E a Sd/- Rain Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge V