1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4624 of 2010 (Khushal s/o Keshaorao Charde, since deceased, through his legal heirs – Smt. Sunanda wd/o Khushal Charde and others v. Sau. Indubai wd/o Ramrao Choudhari and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri G.G. Modak, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri S.V. Sohoni, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri A.M. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent No.4. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 28 th March, 2011 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties. The order dated 17-3-2003 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Wardha, sets aside the order of Tahsildar, Deoli, passed in Revenue Case No.1/59-13/1987-88 on 15-10-1996 and remands the matter back to Tahsildar, Deoli, for fresh enquiry as to the right of the tenant to purchase the suit land and for fixation of the purchase price. Against this order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Wardha, the petitioners preferred the revision before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal has dismissed Tenancy Revision No.TEN/B/14/2004 challenging the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Wardha, by its judgment and order dated 2 3-5-2010. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, the present petition has been preferred by the petitioners. Since the Tahsildar is directed to conduct fresh enquiry as to the right of the tenant to purchase the suit land and for fixation of purchase price, there is no reason for this Court to interfere in the orders impugned in the present petition. However, it will be open for the parties to urge all such points, as are available to them in law, before the Tahsildar. With this observation, the petition is dismissed. Judge pdl