IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3674 OF 2005 Estate Coop. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. .... .... Petitioner V/s The Nasik Mun. Corpn. & Anr...... ..... Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mr.Girish S. Godbole, Adv. for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. 27.9.2005. PC: By this petition the petitioner has challenged the communication dated 8.11.2004 by which the petitioner was directed to temporarily suspend his work of construction. On 16.11.2004 petitioner has already filed a communication requiring vacation of 1 the order dated 8.11.2004 also on the ground that the authority issuing the communication dated 8.11.2004 had no authority to do so. The petition can be therefore conveniently disposed of by directing respondents 1 and 2 to decide the representations made by the petitioner on 16.11.2004 after granting petitioner adequate opportunity of showing cause why the order dated 8.11.2004 is liable to be vacated. Petition accordingly stands disposed of. 27.9.05 2