AB 46/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Sri Sachin Koch, in connection with Garchuk Pol ice Station Case No. 230/2010, under Section 392 IPC. Perused the above application and materials on record including the orde r, dated 03-11-2010, passed in Bail Application No. 4785 of 2010, whereby the Co urt, having considered the fact that the name of the present petitioner has bee n mentioned by the co-accused, as person, who was involved at the time of extort ion, has rejected the prayer for pre-arrest bail. Heard Mr. R Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. BS Sinha , learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. It is, now, submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that the petitioner would ap pear in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, and apply for regular ba il and till then, the prayer for pre-arrest bail be allowed. Considering the fact that the Court has assigned adequate reasons for re jecting the prayer for pre-arrest bail, this Court does not find any merit in th e renewed application for pre-arrest bail. In the circumstances indicated above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is hereby declined. The bail application accordingly fails and the same shall stand dismissed. The petitioner may, however, appear in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magis trate, Kamrup, and if on his appearance in the learned Court below, the petition er applies for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law bearing in mind the fact that the co-accused, as has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner, has been allowed to go on regular bail. In the result and for the foregoing reasons, this bail application shall stand disposed of.