IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 695 of 2003 (M/B) Udayraj alias Commissioner S/o Sri Lakhan Singh, R/o Village ChitarpurMahorla, Police Station Islamnagar, District Badaun …… Petitioner Versus 1. Stattion Officer, Police Station, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. Sri Ram Bachan Yadav s/o Srio Lochan Yadav, R/o village Kachnal Gosai, Tehsil and Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar …… Respondents …….. Mr. J.C.Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner.. Mr. D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondent no. 1. None for respondent no. 2. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. J.C.Belwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.. Mr. D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondent no. 1. None for respondent no. 2. 2. Mr. D.K.Sharma, learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the first information report leading to the registration of a case at Crime no. 303 of 2003 under Sections 363, 366 and 506, I.P.C. at Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar has now become infructuous as the police after investigation has submitted final report before the concerned Magistrate. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 27.04.2006 27.04.2006 A