1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3584 / 2009 [Baban s/o Zibalrao Bhende vs. The State of Maharashtra) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. D R Bhoyar Adv. for applicant Mr Dhote ,APP for respondent .......... CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : JANUARY 12, 2010. Heard. 2. By this application, the applicant prays for grant of bail in respect of Crime No. 283/2009 reported at Hinghanghat Police Station, for offenc punishable under sections 302, 201, read with sec. 34 IPC etc. 3. Learned Advocate for the applicant contended that C.A. Report is not yet received and prayed for liberty to apply afresh after CA report is received, on merits. Meanwhile, it is the grievance of the learned Advocate for the applicant that although the incident occurred in the intervening night between 13.7.2009 and 14.7.2009 and although prosecution is seeking to connect the present applicant on the basis of alleged recovery of knife and clothes, the CA report is not yet placed before the trial Court, resulting into delay in commencing the trial. Learned APP states that he will communicate the I.O. concerned and direct him to move the authroity 2 concerned so as to expedite the CA report as speedy trial is very importnat right of the accused. 4. Present application is rejected, however, with liberty to the applicant to apply for bail afresh if C.A. report is not placed before the trial Court within a period of three months from today. JUDGE sahare