IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 756 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 19, 2010 Madan Lal Sethi …Appellant Versus Labour Commissioner and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewale, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is di- rected against the order dated 5.2.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 1657 of 2009. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the learned Single Judge has not granted liberty to the appellant to claim other benefits by filing a separate petition. Accordingly, we clarify that the decision by the learned Single Judge will not debar the petitioner-appellant to claim other benefits, which may be due to him. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) July 19, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2