IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22786 of 2009 SYED RAMEEZ @ CHHOTU, SON OF SYED GYASUDDIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BABUGANJ, P.S. DEHRI, DISTRICT ROHTAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the statement of the informant recorded in the first information report, petitioner had taken the victim boy to market and thereafter the boy disappeared. In the F.I.R. it is stated that on the request of the informant, petitioner had made an attempt to find out the boy but he failed. Case diary was called for and from the case diary it appears that some material has come during course of investigation that the victim boy had gone to Gaya for purchasing spices and while returning back, he got down at Anugrah Narayan Road Station and thereafter he became traceless. No material has come against the petitioner to further indicate his complicity in the crime. It is stated that the petitioner was arrested from his house on 8.9.2008 while he was sleeping and since then he is in custody. It is - 2 - also stated that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and considering the scanty material available in the case diary against the petitioner, the application is allowed. Petitioner (Syed Rameez alias Chhotu)is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sessions Trial No.628/08 arising out of Dehri P.S. Case No.228/08. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)