-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.4 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.4 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.4 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.G.J.Sabnis for the Appellants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MARCH 24, 2006. MARCH 24, 2006. MARCH 24, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Sabnis for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original Plaintiffs who have failed in both the Courts below. The Plaintiffs approached the court with a plea that their uncle was a tenant and by inheritance they acquired right of tenancy. However, the Appellants- Plaintiffs could not establish their plea that their uncle was a tenant in respect of the suit property. In fact, the issue of tenancy has been concluded against the uncle of the Plaintiffs. 2. That is the reason why the Courts below have held that the Appellants-Plaintiffs have failed to establish their case. 3. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order -2- as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.