S...I-.._.-—.— HlaNCOUOTOFaiHArTKOAIW: B1LASPUR Writ f'Btttton No.lSlS <rf 2003 . Petttloner Respondents Karuna ©.P. Qatwi a^xt 81 years son of LP.Sahu Ex-Storekeeper Rajnandgaon Depot at pfesent resldent of* vitlage Nagol Tahsil Takhatpur, Distnct Bilaspir (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh thiw^h Chief Secretary, ChhattiSEgittt Govemment D.K.BhEMan Raipur (CG) 2. Chhatti^aih Adho^ffandiana Vittas Nigam Chhattisgaih Raipur (Parhiatwft Prabhag^ Raipur thFougb Managihg Direetor, • : Chhattisgati Adhosanrachana Vilas Nigam, Raipur ; (Chhatti^arh) 3. Divlsional Maiager, ChhEtfti^rh Adhosanrachana Vitas N^am, Parivahana Prabhag, Ralpur Ctihatti^arh (Wrtt Petition under Articte 226C27 ofthe eonstibition of India) SB: Hon'bteMr.«lusUceSartlshK. Ayilhotrf Present Shri Kamal Pandey, counsel for tlie petWoner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt Adv. )tar t^pondent No.1/State. Shri AshokVaishnav, eounsel fc>r r^pondentsNo.2 and 3. ORW-OREWt (PaMBB on 19t11 June, 20B7) Learned counsel appearingforthe petittenersubmitsthait the relief sought for in this petffion has already bsen grarrted toy the i respondent-ChhatUsgarh Adhosanrachana Vflteas Ni^im, Raipw ChhatGsgarh. Thus, nothiigsurviws in Uiis msrtter, to whtch iMmed counset appearing fer the respondents hawe nooywstton. (2) The writ peBUon fe accordtf^ dismissed as having become inftiictuous. ^too^derastoco^s. ~—^ ^ Satish K.Agnihotri Judge