IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38858 of 2009 KAMLESHWARI RISIDEO son of late Fusai Risideo Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under sections 342, 323, 379, 384, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is said to have scared the informant but there has been no delivery and a number of witnesses during the investigation have stated that the petitioner is a talkative person and in fact incapable of demanding Rangdari, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 14.9.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No.133 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (a) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (b) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (c) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will - 2 - receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Md.S. (Anjana Prakash,J.)