IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1060 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2010 Naseeb Singh …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 21.7.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 12661 of 2010. 2. The selection was made in October 2006. The petitioner- appellant, who has remained un-successful before the learned Single Judge, was in the waiting list. It was conceded before the learned Single Judge that the life of the waiting list is one year. This has to be so in view of the instructions dated 20.1.1988 (Annexure P-3). In para 3 of the instructions the following stipulation has been made:- “3. It has further been decided that the main list as well as LPA No. 1060 of 2010 (O&M) -2- the waiting list shall remain valid for a period of one year from the date of recommendations. The list of remaining candidates, if any, after one year would be scrapped and if any further demand is received by the Board, it would process the matter afresh and make further recommendations.” 3. In view of the aforesaid, the wait list at best came to an end in October 2007. There is no room to interfere with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the instant appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) August 27, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor