IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.Rev.(T) No.: 84 of 2008. Decided on: 29.10.2010. _____________________________________________________ State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Petitioners. Versus Khem Chand. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondent : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner was engaged as daily waged Beldar in the year 1991. He had completed 10 years’ service with 240 days in each calendar year upto 31.12.2000. In these circumstances, the learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal had directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work-charge status. Since the petitioner has been engaged before 31.12.1993, his case is covered by the ratio of judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhayay vs. State of H.P., 1994 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - SLR(II), 377. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 29, 2010. (sck).