IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 26TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 942 of 2009(A) AGAINST THEORDER IN WPC.28564/2008 Dated 21/05/2009 REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 1. KUTHUPARAMBA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, KUTHUPARAMBA MUNICIPALITY, KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH SRI.THAJUDEEN,SC RESPONDENT(S): 1. C. RAFEEQ, S/O. KUTTIYALI, AGED 32 YEARS, 4/331, KUTHUPARAMBA MARKET. 2. P.R. ABOOBACKER, S/O. KHADER, AGED 67 YEARS, 4/50,. KUTHUPARAMBA MARKET. 3. K. SATHEESH KUMA, PWD CONTRACTOR, AMBIKALAYAM, CHELAVOOR P.O., KOZHIKODE 673 571. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, LOCAL SELF GOVT. DEPARTMENT AND CONVENOR, STATE LEVEL TECHNICAL COMMITTEE, REVENUE COMPLEX, PUBLIC OFFICE COMPLEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. ASST. ENGINEER, PWD ELECTRICAL SECTION, KANNUR. 6. HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT, CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPT., NIT, KOZHIKODE. ADDL. R4 TO R6 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A.553/2009 DT. 15-10-2009. ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI FOR ADDL.R-6 SRI. M. RAMESH CHAND GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 942 of 2009 in W. P (C) No. 28564 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 26th November, 2009. O R D E R The learned Government Pleader has made available to me a communication dated 25-11-2009 from the Chief Engineer to the Advocate General, wherein it is stated thus: “The State Level Technical Committee held on 25.11.2009 has decided to accord technical sanction to the estimate for the work “Market Cum Shopping Complex at Kuthuparamba Municipality”. Now the Municipality can arrange the work. This fact may please be brought to the notice of the Hon'ble High Court.” That being so, there cannot be any impediment for the Municipality to take further steps in accordance with the judgment. Accordingly, I direct the Municipality to take further steps in accordance with the judgment, within one week and to complete the tender proceedings within two months thereafter. The review petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.