1 wp8452.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8452 OF 2010. Lalitbhai Sheth Man Corporation Unit Nos. 108 & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay ... Respondent ...... Mr. R.A. Thorat a/w Satyajeet Mirajkar i/by Pillai & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. M.M. Malvankar for Respondent. ...... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 21ST OCTOBER, 2010. P. C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The petitioners had filed Long Cause Suit No. 2037 of 2004 challenging the notice under section 351 of B.M.C. Act issued by the Municipal Corporation. Issues are framed and the trial is yet to commence. The petitioners moved a Chamber Summons for amendment in the plaint, so as to challenge the order dated 29-4.2004 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, "D" Ward after issuing notice under section 351of B.M.C. Act. The amendment does not alter the nature of the suit in any manner. Even the additional prayer clause (a-1) 2 wp8452.10.sxw and (a-2) do not change the nature of prayers substantially. In view of these circumstances, with the consent of the Counsel for the parties the impugned order rejecting the amendment is hereby set aside. The amendment is allowed. The petitioner shall carry out the amendment in the plaint within 4 weeks from today. 2. Petition is allowed accordingly. J. H. BHATIA, J