1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 294 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Mr. Chapalgaonkar for petitioner/ defendant. 2. Contention is compromise deed as also revenue record are not properly evaluated. Both courts have concurrently applied their mind to the facts and thereafter finding is reached. The report of Commissioner on record, boundaries of the land survey No.420 and the pipeline proceeding from the filed of plaintiff himself to that filed, has been looked into. In this situation, I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity. Writ petition is, therefore, rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:17/01/2011. ans/294