1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 80 OF 2011 (Imran Sardar Khan vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. T.H. Udeshi, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 08, 2011. Heard Ms. Udeshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yengal, learned APP for the respondents. The petitioner preferred an application for grant of parole on 21.05.2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that there was delay in granting his application for parole, hence he has sought compensation and also prayed that action be taken against the person responsible for the delay. We have perused the affidavit filed on behalf of the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur. We find that the delay has been sufficiently explained. Hence, in our opinion, no case is made out for grant of compensation or for taking action against the police authorities. Petition is rejected. 2 The advocate appointed for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is a convict in Central Prison, Nagpur. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.