[1] wp356-11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITION NO.356/2011 Ashok Arjun Chormale & Anr. VS The State of Maha & Ors. .... Shri K.B.Jadhavar,Adv.for petrs. Shri D.R.Kale,A.G.P. for Respondents-State. .... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 18/01/2011. 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, prays for withdrawal of this Writ Petition on behalf of petitioner no.1 with liberty to the said petitioner to file separate writ petition challenging the proclamation dated 31/12/2010. Writ Petition insofar as petitioner no.1 is concerned, is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. [2] wp356-11 3] Insofar as petitioner no.2 is concerned, she was running fair price shop. Authorization of the fair price shop was however, cancelled by the Collector vide order dated 12/8/2010. This order of the Collector has been challenged in Revision by petitioner no.2 and that the Revision is still pending. In the meanwhile, respondent no.3-District Supply Officer has issued fresh proclamation on 21/12/2010 for allotment of fair price shop. This proclamation, according to the petitioner no.2, has been issued in view of the cancellation of petitioner s fair price shop. It is against this backdrop, petitioner has prayed for setting aside the proclamation, pending the hearing and final disposal of the Revision filed by petitioner no.2 before respondent no.2. There is no dispute that the order dated 12/8/2010 passed by the Collector, cancelling the authorization has not been stayed in the Revision by respondent no.2. Keeping that in view, I do not find any reason to pass an order as prayed for in the Writ Petition. Hence Writ Petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that if further steps are taken as per the proclamation dated [3] wp356-11 21/12/2010, the same shall be subject to the outcome of the Revision filed by the petitioner no.2. 4] With these observations, Writ Petition is disposed of. 5] Hearing of the Revision pending before respondent no.2 is expedited. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) umg/wp356-11