IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C.(T) No. 167 of 2008. Decided on: 8th October, 2010. Dr. Ramesh Bharti. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri Vineet Chaudhary and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 4. For respondent No. 5. : Mr. Surinder Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 8th October, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?