IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40047 of 2010 DAYA NAND YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 09-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and perused the allegations made by the Deputy Development Commissioner, Munger in the FIR in which petitioner has been named as an accused. The defence of the petitioner is that during the relevant period he was not Mukhiya. Several submissions stand largely answered by allegation in the FIR that when the Panchayat became a reserved constituency then petitioner allegedly set up his own Munshi on the post of Mukhiya who succeeded and as per FIR Mukhiya, Doman Sah is merely a dummy and petitioner has been doing all the works of Mukhiya. In view of such specific allegations, it is not found to be a proper case for grant of anticipatory bail. The same is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)