IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33573 of 2011 Rudal Kushwaha Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 08.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the informant and the marriage of the petitioner had taken place with the informant on 2.5.2008. After solemnization of marriage, informant went to her sasural. She was allegedly subjected to torture and harassment by the petitioner and other in-laws on account of non-fulfillment of dowry. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that informant herself does not want to lead her conjugal life with the petitioner and, as a matter of fact, petitioner was provisionally released on bail by the learned Sessions Judge and after that when he went to the house of the informant to take her Bidai, the informant flatly refused to accompany the petitioner and similarly, when his prayer for bail was moved before the learned Sessions Judge, the informant again refused to go with the petitioner on this or that pretext. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, particularly, keeping in mind that there is no chance of reconciliation between the parties, let the petitioner, Rudal Kushwaha, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Gopalganj in Bhorey P.S. Case no. 86/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)