IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25663 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ PRADEESH. M.V, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, MUCHIRUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHOWANNUR P.O., KUNNAMKULAM VIA, THRISSUR DT., (RC OWNER OF KL-09-T/235). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (RDO), OTTAPPALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DT.-679 101. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALISSERY POLICE STATION, CHALISSERY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 001. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 25663 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 31/03/2011 IN J-1088/2010. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 05/05/2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR INTERIM CUSTODY OF THE VEHICLE FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 05/05/2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 25663 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be the owner of a mini lorry bearing Reg.No.KL-09-T/235. The proceedings under Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 were initiated against the petitioner resulting in Ext.P1 order. Aggrieved by the said order petitioner has filed Ext.P2 revision before the first respondent and the said revision is pending. Though the revision petitioner has also filed Ext.P3 application for interim custody of the vehicle, orders have not been passed either on the revision or on Ext.P3 application. It is complaining of the above this writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the pendency of Exts.P2 and P3 there will be a direction to the first respondent to pass orders on Ext.P2 revision with notice to the parties as expeditiously as possible at any rate within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 3. It is directed, in the meanwhile, on production of a copy of this judgment the first respondent will also pass orders on Ext.P3 application for interim custody applying the Full Bench decision of this Court in Shan C.T. v. State of Kerala [2010(3)KHC 333]. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-