IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6045 of 2009 RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 14.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner states that he was appointed on 7.7.89. Years later on 7.11.94 an enquiry commenced into his appointment. On 22.11.2002 a show cause notice was issued. On 2.6.2003 his appointment was terminated. The grounds were that there was no vacancy and he was appointed by the authority who was not competent to do so. He came to this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 10051 which was disposed by common order along with L.P.A. No. 946 of 2003 to be scrutinized by the committee. On 29.6.2007 the committee finds him a person not appointed by the competent authority. Prima facie the ground mentioned in the earlier order of termination that there was no vacancy was not found correct by the respondents themselves. The present case on facts has a very striking similarity to the observations of this Court today in C.W.J.C. No. 6041 of 2009 where all aspects have been discussed in detail. The issue arising in the present application are squarely covered by the aforesaid decision. The impugned order/report dated 29.6.2007 is set aside, for same reasons as discussed therein. The writ application is allowed in similar terms as - 2 - C.W.J.C. No. 6041 of 2009 in so far as the benefit to the petitioner is concerned but with consequential right to the respondents also to proceed strictly in the manner provided for therein. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)