IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1282 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 6412 OF 2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's Orders of Coram, appearances, Court' s Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mrs. Nita Solanki i/b Kiran Jain & Co. for the applicant. Shri Narendra Jain i/b S. K. Jain for the respondent. CORAM: S. B. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2006. P. C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this application, the applicant is seeking condonation of 87 days' delay, occurred in filing the first appeal in this court. 2. In paragraph No. 3 of the application, the applicant has referred the various dates including the date of Judgment, obtaining the certified copies and filing of the appeals in this court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties in my view, the delay is properly explained in paragraph Nos. 4, 5 and 6 of the Civil Application. It is not the case that the applicant has resorting a dilatory tactics. The delay is bonafide. 3. In the result, delay of 87 days' caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Civil Application accordingly is allowed and disposed of. 4. List this appeal on 7th of October, 2006. (S. B. DESHMUKH, J.)