IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2008 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1319 of 2008(A) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24995/2008 Dated 23/10/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: ---------------------- DINESH P.GEORGE, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. LATE P.A. GEORGE, POKKATH HOUSE, ERUMATHALA P.O, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ING VYSYA BANK, RAVIPURAM, COCHIN -16, 2. THE TAHSILDAR (RR) ALUVA, ERNAKULAM. BY SC – SHRI.KALKURA FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SHRI BEJOY CHANDRAN FOR R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.NO.1319 OF 2008 IN W.P.C. NO. 24995 OF 2008 A -------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th December, 2008 ORDER I heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Bank, besides the learned Government Pleader. This Court had permitted the petitioner to pay the amount in instalments. In the Review Petition, what is stated is that the petitioner had paid an amount of Rs.1 lakh, but was unable to pay the balance amount and it is stated that the petitioner may be permitted to pay the balance amount in fifteen monthly instalments of Rs.50,000/= each starting from 22.12.2008. 2. Having heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, I feel that inn the circumstances, the Review Petition should be allowed and the Judgment should be modified permitting the petitioner to pay the balance amount remaining to be paid with due interest with the first instalment commencing R.P.1319/08 IN WPC.24995/08A 2 on 5.1.2009 and in eight equal monthly instalments. Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed and the Writ Petition is disposed of modifying the Judgment and directing that the petitioner shall pay off the entire amount with due interest in eight equal monthly instalments, the first of which shall be payable on or before 5.1.2009 and the remaining instalments shall be paid on or before the fifth of every succeeding month. Needless to say, if the petitioner does not pay any of the instalments, he will lose the benefit of this Order and it will be open to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge