ir'iC ^IICI C ^-fcf^ 2— <9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER W.P.(S) No. ^&^S / 2006 Ramchhabile Yadav, S/o. Shri Bhagwat/^ .^S€t^ ^%^^.-- >'*"\3.>-!"^^'""" ^•••-"^'s^-^^'"' .^ y^ ^"'^ Yadav, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School- Vrindanagar, Camp-1, Bhilai, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS --. f-.' ^E.^ GO1^i ^ V5 ^' ,L.^ II -o l^.G-^N c^iw^' ST^ ¥- 1. State of Chhattisgrh,/ Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur 3. District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Durg Distt. - Durg (C.G.), ^-1 bf'"*"? ^' s.;@^ 1. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22^0F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. v/'^\\ XjLs^ '"ik"-—ll, l-r^^^-u*l,y\ XI-HC-78 K|t[CTIS(^qicb ~S:SI '<iWW^,'»SiW ,ls|f)IU^< loP (^O, (£L. t/3/^ ^; 200 311^1 Maqi (yii^ciitff) SD^TT ^iT R-(i+ gsiTSll^Tshfiti STaRKHf^T-W^T 06.12.2006 Shri Vipin Tiwari, learned Smt. Anju Aahuja, leamed G coifnsel for the petitioner. |A. for the State/respondent. the dslte By this petition under Artiele| the petitioner seeks a direction to and seniority on the basis of the ds| of the decision rendered by the Jabalpur in Original Application No| others Vs. State of M.P. and othersl i^ 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India, respondents to pay the increments of his initial appointment in the light llearned State Administrative Tribunal, 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 dated 24.8.1992 pass^d 2. Learned counsel appearing order dated 9th October 2006 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma] and others) and in Writ Petition (i State of Chhattisgarh and other^ simiiariy situated, therefore, the simf fbr 3. The case of the petitioner \\ Teacher in the School Education D| two years with the fixed salary. Ho\| years'probation, the petitioner was| regutar pay scale. Other similary Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Tribunat vide order dated 24.8.191 made several representations to <tii''4t<i41-< Hii<-ii ittei^l'<Ri«i< ^; 3(f^q'3T[^T the petitioner placed reliance on the by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh ) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. ) and submits that the petitioner is ilar order may be passed. that he was appointed as Assistant l^partment on probation for a period of ijrever, later on, after completion oftwo regularized but, he was not given the situated teachers moved the State f(>r regular pay-scale, wherein learned 19|92 allowed the same. The petitioner adcord the same treatment as he is also .T.0. XI-HC-78 HTHtTT ShNT*h f^5 3:5T^[RfRPT, 9ifl.W16, fadl'Hy f. (^6. ^fc43/(^. W[ 200 w 3n^?TMs|c») (*1?!^°"3^') wf^iw ^tffWHiicfan^r similarly situated, but, the responde|nts have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Learned counsel for the pet( be allowed to make a representat) treatment to the petitioner and sam( to other similarly situated teacher^ Administrative Tribunat dated 24.8.t respondent/Stats has no objection. itioner submits that the petitioner may on to respondent No.1 to give similar pay-scale which has been sanctioned on account of the order of the State 1992, to which tearned counset for the 5. Having heard learned couns^ the facts and circumstanees of the| limited prayer made by tearned c^unsel reasonabte. Therefore, the petition^r within a period of two weeks from t^ grievances and, in turn, respo) representation in an objecth/e maniter date of receipt of such representtition, raised by the petitioner and taking passed by the leamed State Admini|strative No. 2745/1988. 6. The wit petition is accord direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certified copy as per rutes. 'bl'lltt-f^)-) tITOTf ff fet^ ;cf»FRR ^•3:I^IT3n^T ;^1 for the parties and having regard to case, in the opinion ofthis Court, the for the petitioner appears to be is allowed to make a representation )day to respondent No.1, raising all his (ident No.1 shall decide the said within a period of 30 days from the i, after considering all the points ihto account the order dated 24.8.1992 Tribunal in Original Application |ngly disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge P.T.O.