-1- Civil Revision No. 1028 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: February 14, 2011. Civil Revision No. 1028 of 2011 (O&M). Harbans Singh ... Petitioner VERSUS Sukhmander Singh ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The petitioner-Judgment Debtor is aggrieved against the orders passed by the executing Court whereby warrants of sale of the property of the petitioner-Judgment Debtor have been issued to recover the decretal amount. The respondent-Decree Holder had obtained a decree for recovery of Rs.74,400/- along with interest from the petitioner-Judgment Debtor and for the -2- Civil Revision No. 1028 of 2011 (O&M). execution of this decree, he (respondent-Decree Holder) had filed execution application before the executing Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned order, I do not see any reason warranting interference in the impugned orders passed by the learned trial Judge. While passing the order for issuance of warrants of sale in respect of the property of the Judgment Debtor, the trial Court took note of the fact that he (Judgment Debtor) had alienated the property in favour of his son Gaurav Singh, who had filed the objection petition before the executing Court. On 9.10.2010, when the execution application was taken up for hearing, neither the objector nor his counsel appeared before the executing Court. Therefore, the executing Court dismissed the objection petition in default. It has rightly been held by the executing Court while issuing warrants of sale of the property of the Judgment Debtor that the transfer of his property in favour of his son i.e objector had been effected just to defraud the Decree Holder and this transfer had to be ignored. I do not see any illegality or perversity in this finding of the learned executing Court. Dismissed. ( MOHINDER PAL ) February 14, 2011. JUDGE ak