WPMS No.336 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Piyush Garg, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sidhartha Sah, the learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, the learned counsel for the respondents. It transpires that the petitioner has filed three suits for cancellation of the sale deeds against the opposite parties. The petitioner has also filed a suit for permanent injunction against the opposite parties. The opposite parties have also filed three suit for cancellation of the sale deed of the petitoiner. All these suits are pending disposal before the IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Haridwar. These facts are undisputed and since there is an interse dispute, the petitioner moved an application for consolidation of the aforesaid suits. This application was rejected by the trial court on the ground that the evidence has not been led in all the suits. The petitioner, being aggrieved, has filed the present writ petition. Considering the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record coupled with the fact that the controvery in all the suits are between the same parties and both the parties are questioning the sale deed executed by the other party, consequently, the court is of the opinion that the evidence which is required to be led in all the suits would be more or less common and it would be appropriate that all the suits are consolidated so that the common evidence is led as far as possible, which will not only save the time of the court but also expenses of the parties concerned. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is quashed. The writ petition is allowed and the trial court is directed to consolidate the suits as prayed by the petitioner in his application. Consequential orders shall be passed within two weeks from the date of prosecution of certified copy of this order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 15.07.2010 LSR