SINGLEBENCH ^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.i f CTS WRIT PETITION N0. ^82& {2006 PETITIONER Janardan Prajapati S/o. Duhan Prajapati, Aged about 30 years, Caste-Kumhar, R/o Duinartoli, Tahsil-Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^y. ^f^ ^ t^-''..-^y ^•-•l!€b--"' .../-A^'" ^"y??"" 1. State of CUhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Panchayat Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G) 2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Cum Revisional Authority Panchayat Election Bagicha, District-Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Retuming Officer (Panchayat Election) Bagicha, District-Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Balram Prasad S/o Bajroo Ram, R/o Village Lota, Tahsil Bagicha, District-Jashpur (C.G.j WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDABIUS. PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS.ORDER OR ORDERS: XI-HC-78 HIHWI SbHIctl 3^''<ll'41fli|, Si-rflwKo, Rldiyy .^..3SM^ ,o, 3T1^T Mact> (tcl^<!t^.tT) sn^T^rR-fi* (RT SI^T sh*ll* ^ y Roshan /tN> ?RtTW:flrf?tT3.n^T 8,8,2006 tDie Adv w*s Shri Amrito Das, Adv. for Shri N.K. Agarwal, Dy. advance copy. Heard learned counsel for By the instant petition und[ the petitioner has questioned the 05.6.2006 (Annexure P-7) wherebj election for the post of Panch preferred and sanie v?as also rejec) Learned counsel for the nomination paper was rejected petition has been filed. Rule 21 (1) (c) of the C.G| Practices And Disquaiification regarding grounds for declaring el| "{c) that any nomincttion.pa^ Therefore, in view of tbe file an election petition for cha] paper. There is a statutory provij case of iniproper rejection of a have filed the election petition As the altemative therefore, this petition does not li| hereby dismissed. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No| dismissed, ttie parties on admission. |er Article 226 of the Constitution of India, [egality and correctness of the order dated i^ the petitioner's nomination paper in the rejected, against which a revision was ;ted. Ipetitioner submits that the petitioners ^sithout any ground, therefore, this writ Hor tion.pa^erlws abbve & efficacious <ti]<ltc-l41.1 WTOt' ^' te^l' rfSTRK Elisrf^raii^T petitioner. . GenerAl for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 on Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Membership) Rules, 1995 envisages sction to be void, which reads as under:- been improperty rejected'," provisions the petitioner is required to lenging the rejection of his nomination sion regarding filing of election petition in paper aild the petitioner ought to the Specified Officer. remedy is available to the petitioner, ;, same is liable to be dismissed and it is noitiination befitre 2988/06 8s I.A. No.7256/06 also stand Sd^- L.C. Qi-W Judge P.T.O. 'i