IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2010 / 28TH JYAISTHA 1932 RP.No. 451 of 2010(Y) --------------------- {IN WPC.29608/2007 OF THIS COURT} .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 5TH RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------ GEETHA.G.NAIR,(LG)HINDI TEACHER, MATTAKKARA HIGH SCHOOL,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MAYA.S,W/O.SUDHEER,DEVI VILASAM, MATTAKARA.P.O,KOTTAYAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. 5. THE MANAGER,MATTAKARA HIGH SCHOOL, MATTAKARA,KOTTAYAM. R2 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.MANU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. --------------------------------------- R.P.No.451 of 2010 in W.P.(C).No.29608/07 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2010 O R D E R THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. The 5th respondent in W.P.(C).No.29608/07 seeks review of the judgment dated 15.2.2010 issued in that writ petition by the Division Bench, following a reference by a learned single Judge. The judgment sought to be reviewed was rendered interpreting Rule 51-A of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules. The Manager of the school in question had earlier filed a review petition as R.P.No.427/10. That was dismissed by us on 27.5.2010. We had then found that there was no error apparent on the face of the judgment and the judgment sought to be reviewed was on a reference made to the Division Bench, to resolve the apparent conflict between two judgments and therefore, we had no reason to believe that all aspects of the matter have not been considered by the Bench. We also notice that the grounds raised by the review R.P.No.451 of 2010 in W.P.(C).No.29608/07 :: 2 :: petitioner herein are also essentially those which could, possibly, generate only appellate hearing. That cannot form the foundation of a review petition. Review petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN) JUDGE Sd/- (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge.