CRM-M-30026 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-30026 of 2011 Date of decision: 8.12.2011 Parveen @ Bholu -----Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present:- Mr.Navneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S.Rattu, DAG, Haryana. --- RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (Oral) CRM No.66159 of 2011 Application is allowed, as prayed for. Main case This is a petition for bail pending trial in a case registered vide FIR No.18 dated 16.1.2010, under Sections 302, 34 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Mohana, Sonepat. It is submitted that an unidentified body was recovered from the mustard fields of Sugar Mill Farms on 16.1.2010. A DDR was lodged by father of the deceased that his son is missing from his house. He identified the dead body of his son on 1.4.2010 when a news in this regard appeared in the newspaper. He suffered his first statement on 5.4.2010 but at that time he did not raise any suspicion on anybody. However, on 29.4.2010 he raised finger towards the petitioner as well as Amarjeet, co- accused, on the ground that they have been last seen in the company of his CRM-M-30026 of 2011 2 deceased son. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 8.6.2010. He further submits that it is a blind murder and the petitioner has been falsely involved in the case because had the petitioner been last seen in the company of the deceased then he could have easily mentioned in his statement on 5.4.2010. But at that time, he did not raise any suspicion against the petitioner. Therefore, the second statement of the petitioner made on 29.4.2010 appears to be tutored. He further submits that the petitioner has been involved on the basis of recovery of identity card, photo and ration card, whereas PW10 has submitted that said recovery has been effected at the instance of Amarjeet, co-accused/non- applicant. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Ram Chander, submits that in total there are 19 witnesses, 12 witnesses have already been examined and the next date fixed before the trial Court is 13.2.2012. He further submits that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observations on merits, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 8.12.2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) mks JUDGE