IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2009 / 18TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 6554 of 2008(E) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ASOKAN, S/O.CHELIPARAMBIL AYYAPPAN, KARALAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SUKUMARAN, S/O.CHELIPARAMBIL AYYAPPAN, KARALAM P.O., THRISSUR DT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR DT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. R1 BY ADV. MR.BABU CHERUKARA, SMT.ROSAMMA MATHEW, R2 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SMITHA SUKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.6554/2008-E: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.D1-889/2005/K. DIS. DTD. 11/05/2005 ISSUED BY R.2. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LETTER NO: B1-3846/06 DTD. 06/10/2006 FROM R.4. TO R.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE LETTER NO: B2-7919/2005 DTD. 22/03/2007 FROM R.2. TO R.3. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.16/08/2007 FROM PETITIONER BEFORE R.4. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R1.A: COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 810/03 DTD. 29/04/2003 OF THE KATTOOR SUB REGISTRY. EXT.R1.B: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED ON 04/06/2005 BY THE R.1. BEFORE THE R.D.O. THRISSUR. EXT.R1.C: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DTD. 25/05/2005. EXT.R1.D: PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERTY IN SY. NO. 242/7 & 242/8 OF KARALA VILLAGE. EXT.R1.E: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 04/10/2005 FILED BY BIJU & BINU BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. EXT.R1.F: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTOOR POLICE STATION, DTD. NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 6554 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 9th July, 2009. J U D G M E N T By Ext. P1 notice, the 1st respondent was directed to cultivate the land belonging to him mentioned therein with paddy, since, according to the Revenue Divisional Officer, who issued Ext. P1, the land was under cultivation with paddy during three years immediately preceding the commencement of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967. The petitioner's grievance is that on account of the 1st respondent converting the land, the cultivation of paddy in the land belonging to the petitioner adjacent to the land mentioned in Ext. P1 has become impossible. He therefore seeks implementation of Ext. P1. 2. The 1st respondent has filed a counter affidavit, wherein it is stated that against Ext. P1, the 1st respondent filed Ext. R1(b) objections before the Revenue Divisional Officer . 3. In view of the above circumstances, I am of opinion that the 2nd respondent should pass a final order in the matter after considering Ext. R1(b) objections filed by the 1st respondent to Ext. P1. The above process shall be taken up and completed by the Revenue Divisional Officer as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 1st respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/