IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.4282/2004. : : Anil Kumar Gupta & Ors. Vs. The Director Gramin Vikas & Ors. : : Date of Order 19.8.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Rajendra Sharma for the petitioner. Mr.Shyam Sunder Sharma, Govt.Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming the benefit of Government Circular dated 1.7.2003. Although it is contended by the learned counsel for the parties that this circular was set aside subsequently by the judgment of learned Single Judge but even otherwise the petitioner in para Nos.6 to 9 of the reply has come out with specific plea that even if Clause 13 of the circular given effect no candidate lessor meritorious then the petitioner has been appointed. The Supreme Court in the judgment of Kailash Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan : 2002 (6) SCC 562, held that only those persons are entitled to appointment who had already approached the court prior to judgment passed by the Full Bench. The case of the petitioner also, therefore, does not fall in the category of this whom the appointment was to be given as per the judgment of Supreme Court. I do not find any merit in this writ petition when the petitioner is not in position to give the name of the candidate lessor meritorious then him who has been given appointment. In the result, this writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.45.