IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50566 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA @ ABHAY KUMAR,son of Jagdish Sharma, resident of village-Basawan Ray Tola, P.S. Piro, District-Bhojpur--- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR----OPP. PARTY ----------- 2. 20.1.2009 Heard Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The allegation is that in a case in which the petitioner was an accused, he attempted to get an order of this Court declaring him a juvenile. A forged certificate, which is said to be issued by the Bihar Secondary School Examination Board showing him to be lesser age, was produced before the A.C.J.M, Ara, with a prayer that the petitioner be declared a juvenile. The Court refused the prayer of the petitioner and that resulted in filing of Cr. Revision no.9 of 2004 by the petitioner which was disposed of by order dated 10.11.2005. The relevant record was produced before the Court from the office of Bihar School Examination Board and it was found that the certificate produced by the petitioner before the A.C.J.M., Ara, was forged and fabricated. As such, the Court directed the A.C.J.M., Ara, to lodge a case against the accused and also against the persons who have sworn affidavit. This is how the petitioner is in custody in a case which is Official Complaint case no.18(O) of 2006. The contention is that other accused has been admitted to bail by a Bench of this Court and in support of the contention the relevant order passed by the Court has been annexed as Annexure- - 2 - 7 to the present petition. The order admitting to bail to other accused is not going to influence the view of this Court as regards prayer for bail inasmuch as the petitioner is the direct beneficiary of that forgery and considering that, the petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )