-- 1 -- Criminal Application No.5212/2010 with Criminal Application No.5213/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5212 OF 2010 Sameer s/o Suresh Vyapari ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Mrs. S.S. Jadfhav, Advocate for the applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5213 OF 2010 Sanjay s/o Prabhakar Kadam ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Mrs. S.S. Jadfhav, Advocate for the applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 28th January, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. In a well plan to have ransom from his father, Sushil, the son, is the sufferer and lost his precious life. The -- 2 -- Criminal Application No.5212/2010 with Criminal Application No.5213/2010 accused/ applicants having noticed that the plan to have bargain and ransom from his father being frustrated, decided to eliminate Sushil. The statement of accused Sanjay, recorded by the police, narrates the events, which is in the form of confession, dated 16.8.2010. Its worth at this stage, need not be a decesive factor. There is recovery at the instance of accused/applicant Sameer. The place from where rope/string was purchased was located, the vendor has identified Sameer. The manner of brutality demonstrated by the accused/ applicants, even if charge sheet is filed, does not call for releasing them on bail. Both applications are rejected. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri5212.10