IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 14643 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ LIJI, W/O.SANTHAN, SANTHA SADANAM, KRISHNA PILLAI JUNCTION, KODUMPADOM, KULASEKHARA MANGALAM, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISION OFFICE, PALA. 3. THE GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM. 4. MARAVANTHURUTHU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. SREEJITH BOSE, S/O.K.G.CHANDRABOSE, 32/1113, SOUPARNIKA, PALARIVATTOM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C) No. 14643 of 2008-R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is aggrieved by the manner in which the sand mining is conducted by the fifth respondent. It is stated that the fifth respondent is using 440 HP motor and pump, which causes extensive damages to the property of the petitioner. It is highlighting these grievances, the petitioner has already moved the first respondent by filing Ext.P6. 2. Now, that the petitioner has already moved the first respondent, I do not think at this stage that it is necessary for this Court to examine the grievances highlighted in this writ petition. I, therefore, direct that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the first respondent shall take necessary action on Ext.P6 but, however, after giving notice to the fifth respondent and the affected parties. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the first respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge ms