IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7531 of 2005 Ram Kunwar Pandey, son of Late Dukhi Pandey R.O.V Dharwar, P.S. Sonhan, District-Kaimur Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Kaimur(at Bhabhua). 3. The Sub-Divisional Certificate Officer, Sub-Divisional Magistrate Bhabhua. 4. The Branch Manager, the State Bank of India, Bhabhaua. 5. The Assistant General Manager, the State Bank of India, Region V Patna. ----------- 5 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State of Bihar and its authorities as well as learned counsel for the State Bank of India and its authority who have filed their respective counter affidavits. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging order dated 22.07.2004 (Annxure-7) passed in Certificate Rev.(Appeal) No. 02 of 2004 by which the Collector, Kaimur dismissed the Appeal No. 02 of 2004-05 on the ground of limitation and also challenging the original order of the Sub- Divisional Certificate Officer, Bhabhua (Respondent No. 3) dated 07.04.2004 (Annexure-6) in Certificate Case No. 203 (B)/200/2002. 3. It is not in dispute that by order dated 07.04.2004 (Annexure-6) the Sub-Divisional Certificate Officer, Bhabhua rejected the objection of the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act. Against such order, appeal is provided under Section 60 of the Act within 30 days from the date of order but the said appeal was filed by the petitioner admittedly on 30.06.2004 which was beyond the time prescribed for such an appeal and furthermore, no application 2 for condoning the delay was filed. 4. In the said circumstances the District Court was quite justified in passing its impugned order dated 22.07.2004 dismissing the said appeal under Section 60 of the Act. Hence, order of Sub-Divisional Certificate Officer Bhabhua dated 07.04.2004 has attained finality, moreso when no statutory revision as provided under Section 62 of the Act has been filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner. 5. In the said circumstances, this Court does not find any reason to interfere in the matter. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed. Prakash (S.N.Hussain, J.)