THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR F.C.A. M.P. No. 667 of 2010 and F.C.A. No. 122 of 2007 Judgment: The appellant-wife filed the Family Court Appeal aggrieved by the order dated 02.06.2007, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, allowing F.C.O.P. No. 311 of 2005, filed by the respondent-husband, granting divorce by dissolving their marriage and rejecting the counter-claim of the appellant-wife for restitution of conjugal rights. The matter underwent several adjournments. Today when the appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant- wife and the learned counsel for the respondent-husband submitted that both the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband, settled the matter outside the Court by entering into a Memorandum of Compromise. Both the appellant-wife and the respondent-husband appeared before the Court and they are also identified by the respective counsel. The appellant-wife and the respondent-submitted having entered into Memorandum of Compromise, filed application in F.C.A. M.P. No. 667 of 2010 praying the Court to record the Memorandum of Compromise, and dispose of the appeal in terms thereof. As prayed for by the appellant-wife and the respondent- husband, the Memorandum of Compromise, is placed on record, and the appeal is disposed of in terms of by recording the terms of compromise, entered into by the parties. The marriage of the appellant-wife with the respondent-husband stands dissolved, as ordered by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad. As per the terms of the compromise, the respondent-husband has handed over to the appellant-wife, the gold ornaments, money, tile deeds of plot etc., as mentioned in the Memorandum of Compromise, in the presence of the counsel, and appellant-wife also acknowledged the receipt thereof. Insofar as the criminal case filed by the appellant-wife against the respondent-husband, for the offence under Section 498-A I.P.C. is concerned, the learned counsel for the appellant-wife submitted that the appellant-wife, as agreed in the terms of compromise, will file an application before the trial Court, for withdrawal of the same. Accordingly, the F.C.A.M.P. is allowed and consequently, the Family Court Appeal stands disposed of by and in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise and as ordered above. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. _______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Dated: 29th November, 2010 KSR