pvr 1 wp2318-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2318 OF 2010 Acharya Swami Ganeshdas Ji & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. 1.Sawminarayan Gadi Sansthan and others. ...Respondents --- Mr.Pradip Sancheti, Sr.Advocate with Mr.B.Colabawala i/b. Interjuris,for Petitioners. Mr.D.D.Madan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.G.C.Mohanty i/b. Kirit Damaniya & Co., for Respondent nos.1 & 2. Ms.Priti Purandare, for Respondent nos.3 to 6. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED: 11th April,2011 P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel appearing for petitioners states that in view of what is stated in paragraphs 4(d) and 4(e) of the Affidavit of Mr.Shivaji T.Yamgar, Asstt.Engineer(B.P.) City III of Respondent no.3, the petitioners seek pvr 2 wp2318-10 leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent nos.1 and 2 states that in the same affidavit the Corporation has stated that the plans have been sanctioned as per law. In our opinion, as the petitioners want to withdraw the petition for whatever reasons, we cannot decline permission to withdraw the petition. The petition is permitted to be withdrawn. As the petition itself is withdrawn, Chamber summons no.129 of 2011 does not survive for consideration. It is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.)