IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27090 of 2009 SUMANT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is accused in a case instituted for the offence under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that neither the petitioner is named in the first information report nor he was identified in test identification parade, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C.-I, Patna in Parsa Bazar P.S. case no. 81 of 2008, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and further that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of the bail on the ground of misuse and further that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and he is fails to do son on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (Anjana Prakash, J). M.Rahman