IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 464 of 2008 (S/S) Ashok Kumar. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. None for the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 1 & 3. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. / respondent No. 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Petitioner seeks an order directing the State of Uttarakhand to relieve him so as to enable him to join the State of Uttar Pradesh. In the counter affidavit filed, it has been stated that the petitioner has been finally allocated to the State of Uttarakhand. 3. In those circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 03.01.2011 03.01.2011 G