- 1 - 903.caw.259.11 wp 4787.08 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4787 OF 2008 Prabodh Mehta ..Applicant (Orig.Petitioner) -Versus- The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents .......... Mr.Prateek Seksaria i/by Vidhii Partners for the Applicant (Original Petitioner). Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Kavi Tamboli i/by M/s.Thakore Jariwala & Assoc. for Respondent No.4. .......... CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATE : 17TH MARCH 2011. P.C. 1 Heard Prateek Seksaria, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, Mr.Kavi Tamboli, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 4 and Mr.R.M.Patne, learned AGP appearing for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2 The Civil Application is filed for restoration of the Writ Petition No. 4787 of 2008 alongwith Civil Application No.49 of 2009, which were dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 3rd May - 2 - 903.caw.259.11 wp 4787.08 2010 on failure of attending the matter by the learned counsel of the Applicant when the matter was called out for hearing on 29th April 2009 . 2 This Civil Application is opposed by the Respondents. I have gone through the explanation given by the Applicant in paragraph nos.4, 6, 7 and 8 of the Civil Application, which I find to be sufficient. The Civil Application is allowed. The Civil Application alongwith the Writ Petition is restored to file. So far as the interim relief is concerned, the Petitioner is at liberty to apply afresh after serving the Respondents. [ RANJIT MORE, J. ] -