IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.5048 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 25, 2011 HARWANT KAUR ALIAS SHINDI & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. SL Chandershekhar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. MKBhatnagar, Advocate, for respondents 5 to 7. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 The petitioners, mother and son, pray for protection of their life and liberty. 2 It is the admitted case of the petitioners that a civil litigation with the private respondents is pending adjudication at the appellate stage. The petitioners want to take possession of the land and the house in the village. As per the allegations, the petitioners are being threatened by the private respondents and they are not being allowed to take possession of the property. 3 On behalf of the respondent-State, it has been brought out, on the basis of inquiry report (Annexure R-3), that Ravinder Singh, son of petitioner No.1, died on account of administration of poisonous substance. Petitioner No.1-mother was charged with Criminal Misc. No.5048 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 the offence of murder of her son-Ravinder Singh, along with her lover Dharam Singh and 4/5 other persons. FIR No.183 dated 28.8.2002 under Sections 302, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Ajnala, District Amritsar, had been lodged. Be that as it may, petitioner No.1 has been acquitted of the charges. 4 When the equities are balanced and the case of the petitioner as also the case set up by the private respondents is seen, it becomes apparent that it is on account of civil dispute between the petitioners and the private respondents, who are relatives of Balkar Singh (husband of petitioner No.1), that the present petition has been filed. The petitioners have the remedy of approaching the civil court, for execution of the decree passed by the civil court. 5 In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, no ground for issuance of directions under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, is made out. 6 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. August 25, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?