IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 896 of 2007 Karan S/o Mukhram. …….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……. Respondents Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. S.K. Shandilya, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. S.K. Shandilya, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 24.08.2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 3 of the short counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 17.08.2007 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 28.11.2008 V.K