... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1790 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1790 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1790 OF 2005 ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum Office Notes, Office Memorandum Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders orders or directions and orders orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders Registrar’s orders Registrar’s orders ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Shri. A.S.Ramesan for the Applicant. Shri. Arvind Manghirmalani for the Respondent No.1. Ms S.D.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : AUGUST 26, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 26, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 26, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the advocate appearing for the Applicant, advocate appearing for the Respondent No.1 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Considering the averments made in the Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. However, considering the duration of delay, the Respondent No.1 will have to be compensated by ordering payment of costs. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "a" subject to the Applicant paying costs of Rs.5,000/- to the Respondent No.1 within a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE