IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 12876 of 2005 Between: Ch.S.Sulochana devi, w/o Srihari Rao, r/o Yarrabalem, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District-522 503. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Project Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Guntur, Near Medical Club, Guntur-1. 2 The Regional Deputy Director, Women Development & Child Welfare Department, 8th Line, Ramnagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Director, Women Development & Child Welfare Department, 8-3-222, Behind Saradhi Studio, Vengalrao Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 4 The District Collector, Guntur. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the representation dt.1-6-2004 for giving the post of Anganwadi Worker at Yerrupalem in Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District where she worked from 1-2-1991 to 28-7-2003 before going as ACDPO in the sponsored agency of TIMES and not allowing her to join is arbitrary, illegal, against the rules and violative of Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents 1 & 4 to consider the application of the petitioner and to appoint her as Anganwadi Worker at Yerrupalem or in any place in the District with immediate effect in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.K.CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR WOMEN DEV. & CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. C.V. RAMULU, J 26-02-2008 ks