IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3846 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 14 , 2009 Bhagu ...... Petitioner Versus Smt. Maina Devi ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. S.S.Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order of the trial court declining permission to the petitioner to lead evidence in rebuttal. Learned trial court has correctly found that if any evidence was required, all the witnesses now proposed to be summoned should have been summoned at the time of leading affirmative evidence by the petitioner. Having gone through the application for additional evidence and the cross-examination of the defendant, in my opinion the decision of the learned trial court cannot be faulted. Consequently the petition is dismissed. No costs. Since the main case has been decided, the CM stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE July 14, 2009 sunita