[-s'a«»y]e»£K^Nif'M/L '"--l!yfy C.^\ £TO ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR W . P. (Sl NQ.i2-Q3 I 2007 Petitioner -Bharatlal Sahu, S/o Late Shri ./A/f^ ^anwat Ram Sahu, Aged about o Y T^..- ^' yrt7.<^; ...•• 43--years, Assistant Teacher, \'.-••'' Govt. Middle School, Sector-6, Bhilai, Durg, Dist : Durg-(C,G.) Versus Respondents : il -^ ^J^\9? ^^:)\ \^'^ €^yy ii) ui)- State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) Directorate of Public Instruction, Raipur-fC.G.) District Education Officer, Durg-(C.G.) " WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QFINDIA HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S^No.1283 of 2007 Pefftioner Bhsratla! Sahu Versas Respondente State of ChhaSsgarh & others SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, <J Shri S. K. Thomas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupte, Depufy Govf. Advocate forthe respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 2"" day of March, 2007) The foliowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Learned counsef appearing for the pefiSfoner submits fhat the questSon of law involved in this petition is governed by the circuSar dated 20.1.1987. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh, indore Bench, in the case of indraveer Singh Tomar Vs. Stete of M.P. and othen { 2004 (2) M.P.H.T. 3 (NOC)}, has considered the issye and disposed of the said matter in Sis foSSov/ing terms:- "2..........Sn viesv of this subniissjon advanced by Counse! for parties, this pefc'fion is disposed of by giv'ing fo!lovflng di'recttons. The respondsnt No.1 sha'l consider sgfioner's Thakur rspressntations refsrred to above ar.d dispose of the san''ie at an earfy date, preferabty vrfthin a period of 3 monffis from the date of communication of this order in accordance with lav/, kseplng ji" mind the circutars issued by State GovS. as also the directtons given by'fte Tribunat in simiter matters." 2. Learned counse! appearins for the partiss woutd iointiy submjt and admit thatthis case, being similar in nature, is squarely covered by the decision in the ease of indraveer Singh Tonsar (supra). 3. In view of the sforestated reasons, this petition is disposed of with (sberty to the petitioner to maks a representation afong v/tth a copy of the order passed In the case of Indravesr Singh Toniar (supra). •Atiteh may be considered and decided, in accordance writh !aw, wffesn -^ ?^^?i^^l fvf &iv tft*SAt'ro fr^tWt ^ttf^ rl-ai1^ /rf ?^/*aip^+ f^f t^A !^A?^!'Sfffi!^^2S'Hftl^ h-!i ei W^iivU VI SiA. W^?^f\S iiviii HiS U<ai,s? VI i^vSlSJi. Vi Uiic iSfc/l^s^lifcCiyyii. e^r^S/'i^pr •^f*' +A /'.'i?'- ciS iu ^vSi.;?. •Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge