“Wm /, mm mm IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDEN‘rs VERSUS f 1. fV‘ / Ram Kumar Gupta aged about 51 years, S/o— late Jagdish Prasad Gupta, working as Helper, posted at Public Health Engineering Department, Sub Division Baikunthpur, District- Korea (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through ’the Secretary, Department of Public Health Engineering, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Engineer in Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Bilaspur, Division Bilaspur (C.G.) Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Sub Division Baikunthpur, District— Korea (C.G.) Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Ambikapur, Division Ambikapur, District— Surguja (C.G.) Purshottam Lal Yadav, Working as driver, posted at Public Health Engineering Department, Division Bilaspur, Districte Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. A M w.P. s N0. (C.G.) @Qg 2011 ‘5 @ / (0C7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR... JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.[S).NO. 668/ 201 1 PETITIONER Ram Kumar Gupta VCI‘SuS RESPONDENTS State of C.G. 8b OtheIS Shri D.K.Vishwakarma, counscl for the petiu'oner. Sbn' NrNaha Roy, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (04.11.2011) Shn' Naha Roy submits that the case of the petitioner is under active consideration for appointing him on the post of dn'ver and the present petition can be disposed ofwith a direcu'on to the respondent No.5 to pass appropriate onier Within some timeframe. Counsel for the petitioner agrees to the proposal as put forth by Shn' Roy. In View of above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.5 to pass appropriate order in the case of the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It would be the duty of the petitioner and the State counsel to apprise the respondent No.5 about the passing of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same stlictly in accordance MW Sdl- Pritinker Diwaka‘ Judge