(L-F^' C[tzr0^ ^Y IN THE HIGH CC'URT OF JUDICATURE CHH,fi.TTIS6ARH AT P.T.I A Cpl JO L^j-i^n^^r t-^r^ W,U,_(S) N0. •Lf':f-2_-4 / 2006 .^f^>- ......^i^'^ ^•"^•^®.^" ^^-•y A®&"" RECEIVED-bOPY CLERK to A,(^(V-^l^ ;. BIIiASPJiIB •Ofc> 1 ."anqar ba! "am -/ S/o Late Laiiu Ram Ases about 33 years. ;-»ooi. i &u^ric..i- i./uv&i'rtiiic.nf School, iiast!. BalKuntpur Korea-(C.S.) iempu Ram, O/G L-U7& L-?tyi iU r^Utii, Aged sbos 36 years, Asst. Teacher Adim Jati Vibhaa, Prin'.ary Schoo!, n^^^jr^ 0_-::s^: i^Ag^; ;.ss f\;^-4> Dufiuli, ouif\u(ii yu(\ L/is i (C.6.) Dif.'Qni l/_.^^^ is.ui ea- Smt. Ksran Kumudar',! Ti"k! / W/'o Shr-i Asiand Prakash Tirki, Aaed about 38 vears, Pnma"y school AAahaloara. D^.-:L^=--,-i-^.i-. ?^:-.4- . I/—..»_^—_//tjS^ buiKunTDur^ DiST °' i^oreu-iC.u.j \/"r<e?! '< y <S.i ^u< Responcients 5tate ot ChhatTisqsrh. Throuah - The Education beparfmer.t. D.K.S. Bha'A'ar!, Rsipur. L/i3T • Kuipur~[t/.fc7.} The Director.^" Pubiic Itistruction Department Rai ir- (C.6.5 Dlstrict trducatlon Utficer','" Ejistrict: Korea-(G.o.) Heac! Office - BaiKunTpur-CC.&J 4 (2) ' Pi\/ r^'^^^*~?"r>f?^rii!/'n+j^*ft't i^?y. l^/«t t»<<f!wi ^ i^.^ai^'^iid 2 a'l.'iij ^\:^^- . l/^^^^^fj^ & \ L/i^ i • j-^vi-c»'ijt-^^'*<-/.j ^^^^,^_f^ /^ \ phVi"SU-^^* *<-?.j Head Office - Ba!kuntpur-(C.6.) WRIT PETITEON UNDER ARTTCLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTLTUTLON OF IN4DIA FOR ISJ'JANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. W'RITS. &IRECTLON ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE XI-HC-78 ^i+irti aitrrai 3^T "i|l<llc1'4, ®Tt1<H'l<»,[afdlti^ -.^J?...^.7.^lpA. ^ 200 3TT^?r iraw (yit^st^ff) sn^r qrr f^iiq; (PITSTI^TsbHlti STgTWHfN'sTT^r 1.9.2006 Mr. AnilSingh Rajput, Advq Mias. Deepali Pandey, P.L. f] Heard. By this writ petition, dh-ection agam.st the respon^ seniorit\r froiu fhe date of tlieir order dated 4.8.2005 (Annexurf passed iu coiapliance ofthe ord| The case of the petiti^ appointed as Assistaut Tea^ Department on probatkiu for a on afier coinpletion of two regularized but fhey are not Other sim.Uarly situated teache) Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur foi| ultunately decided in fhe year favour of ffae Assistaat Teacfc.4 order, aa order dated 4.8.20051 of probation period to the several repicseutations to acco| suailarly situated Teachers, bu1[ heed, therefore, fhey are forced Leamed counsel for petitioners m.ay be aUowed to No.2 to give sinular treatnient scale which has been. Assisltaut ^iPlfa^T IIPTCTr'ff fec^ rfsTRTC ^ari^Tsn^r fcate for the petitioner. F|3r the State on advance copy. 1|tie peQUoners liave prayed. tor a iftents to pay fhe increnient aad ^Difial appoiutment in the l^ht ofthe P-2) aad also as per Aaiiexure P-3 l|ers passed by this HonTjle Court. jinei's is fhat diev were iru.tiaBv fchers in fhe School Edzication Iperiod of two years. However, later rears tenure the petitioners v»ere ^eing given fhe icgular pay scale. frs m.oved before the High Couit of regu]ar pay scale aad the inatter 2004 vide L.P.A. No. 135/2004 iu ^rs and ia coiapliance of aforesaid has been for payiuent of increinent Teachers. The petitioners niade ^•d saiae treatanent as fhey are also fhe respondeiits have not paid any |to file this writ petition. petitioners subniits that fhe a representation to respondent to fhe petrdoners and the same pay to other simiiarlv situated the diake saactlioned P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^ •^141d'4, aTn+l'IS, Rlclltiy *TTOCTTSb*<|cti WT 200 SIT^T q^? (lic('S°«^) Soma •f^e^.^ ^tTWHf??T3II^T 'tA Uttt teachers on account of fhe coiapliaace of fhe order passe^ leEimed counsel appeariag foit objection. Having heard leamed c(i' regard to the facts aiid circu^n; prayer inade by learued couns^] just, fair aad reasonable. T^ opinion on the nierit of case, ft^ representation along wifh copy respondent No.2 wifhin a perio(f their grievances aud iii tura, same in aii objecti.ve inanner ttp date of its receipt, after consic} petitioners and ta:kiug into a( Madhya Pradesh High Court 41 present petitioners stand on th^ L.P.A, No.135/2004, then they| scale. With fhe direction aforesajd Pardes are entitled for 4il<ilfi-l41-l tfiHnT ^' te^ <RI«;K ^i3Tf^IT3n^T oider Aiuiexure P-2 passed in in L.P.A. No. 135/2004, to which the State/ respondents has no Itl 'unsel for the parties aad havin^ nstaiices of fhe case, the Ihnited :1 for the petitionei-s appears to be lerefore, wifhout expressing aay |e petitioners are allowed to uaake a of this petition and aanexures to of ten days froni todav raisnig a]l respondent No.2 shaB decide fhe it'hm a period of 30 days froni the 'iiag ail the points raised by fhe ^count the order passed by the L.P.A. No. 135/2004, aad if the same footing as fhe petitioners in be also san.ctioned fhe saiae pay certified , the petition staads disposed of. copy of fhis order. - ^ L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. ^