IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23736 of 2010 MURARI YADAV, SON OF BAIJNATH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BARUNA, P.S.-SIKANDRA, DISTRICT-JAMUI…………………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.N. Jha, A.P.P. ----------- 5. 6.10.2010. Learned A.P.P. for the State files affidavits. Let the same be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prayer of the petitioner for bail has already been rejected thrice vide orders as contained in Annexure-‘1’ series to this application. There is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner of firing from a point blank range causing the death of the deceased. 2 No fresh ground has been shown by the petitioner for grant of bail. In the above view of the matter, the prayer of the petitioner for bail is again rejected. However, it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that despite the order of this Court, the trial of the case could not be concluded within six months. I have perused the report sent by the trial court in Criminal Misc. No.37901 of 2009 in which it has been stated that due to non examination of the certain witnesses, the trial could not be concluded. Now, affidavit have been filed by the State that Investigating Officer has already been examined. In the above view of the matter, it is expected from the trial court to conclude the trial within six months. P.S. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)