CWP (T) No. 13400 of 2008 4.1.2011 Present: Mr.Himant Negi, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. Respondents, in their reply, have clarified that by way of policy decision, it was only in the year 1999 that condition of age of 45 years was relaxed to be 48 years. Government has not considered any other case for relaxing this criteria of age. Petitioner being more than 45 years of age could not have been considered for appointment to the post in question on batchwise basis. It is further clarified that government has issued orders of appointments pertaining to the batch of 1983, whereas petitioner belongs to the batch of 1986. This stand of the respondents is not refuted by the petitioner by filing rejoinder. Even during hearing, it is not so disputed. It is also stated at the Bar that presently petitioner is more than 50 years of age. 2. Consequently, it cannot be said that petitioner’s case has been unfairly or illegally dealt with by the authorities. No legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Consequently, present petition is dismissed. 4th January, 2011 (Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.