IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38779 of 2009 BINAY RAUT . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 12/01/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a police case under Sections- 420, 465 and 471 of Indian Penal Code. With regard to alleged illegalities in the appointment of Panchayat Teachers, is that he is not named in the F.I.R. which is based on suspicion and, in any event, the claim preferred by the aggrieved has been rejected by the Block Development Officer by his order dated 25.2.2008 which is the foundation of the F.I.R. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Ariari P.S. Case No.27/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) Cr.P.C. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)