IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.926 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2910 OF 2004 Plavumkal Chacko Matthai ..Plaintiff Vs. Dhinakara Bass and Ors. ..Defendants Mr.Rajesh Parab for the plaintiff None for the defendants CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . The present suit is based on promissory note of Rs.70,000/- and interest thereon of Rs.30,450/- totalling to Rs.1,00,450/-. Summons for Judgment has been served on the defendants on 17.12.04. There is no reply. Plaintiff has filed affidavit of service dt.17.10.05. The same is taken on record. However, with a view to give an opportunity to the defendants I directed the plaintiff to give notice to the advocate for defendant by order dt.5.10.05. Pursuant to the same, notice is given on 14.10.05. The same is taken on record. Inspite of notice, none appears for the defendants. In that view of the matter, Summons for Judgment is made absolute. Suit is decreed accordingly as prayed. Suit as well as summons for judgment are disposed of accordingly. Refund of court fee as per rules. No order as to costs.