_i Err FH*E ffieH' die-trR"I OF sf~KKfRI- w- t.rl i :±`-Trty ORDER SHEET ........F.aA.®.a.I a.enjay .SIDmo..&..ors Versus ...... N6. 2 OT5a£-2000. Petitioner/Appe]]ant .....Respondent Order with. Signature '.t€ resent : M. Arm Sarien and Mr. K T. Bhutia, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. S. P. WangdL Advocate General with Mr. B.K. Rai, Advocate and ,M. Kama Thinlay, Assistant Govt Advocate for reprndent Nos. I & 2. M. A K. Upadtryaya, Advocate for reapondcht No.4. Heard Admit. Issue notice upon the respondents. M. Wangdi, leaned Advocate General appearing for reapondent Nos. I and 2 accepts notice. M. AK. Upadiryaya accepts notice on behalf of reapndent No.4. M. S. Namchyo, leaned Advocate accepts notice on behalf Of reapndent No.5. Issue notice upon reapondent No.3. A cquy of the notice be also served upon`M. a. Sharng who appeared on behalf of Judgment 0- debtor, that is, the reapondsnt No.3 in the Cout below. Mr. Sharm submits that he will ascertain from respondent No.3 as to whether the requndent No.3 will engage M. Sharma before this Cout also. M. SharmawillinformtheRegistrytomorrow. Requisites be filed try tomorrow. The appellants sham also mal[earlangementtoservenoticeuponthereapndentNo.3tyapial messanger and affidavit of service sliall be filed dy the appellant withinaweek.Anoticebealsopul)lishedintwoNationalNewspapers in Hindi and Engrsh langiiage having wide circulation in Smin and West Bengal. The appellaut shall take out notices from the Registry andgetitpublished. Office Note as tb t:f:`L03Ii8:gg! a,h L8 I-gr` c^ucrd t4i ~,-,#-- ' JL J -h, / \..--__- .- i:< ---- _- + |`-=,:fir- -- -i < Serial No. of Order Order with Signature ' The appellant shall prqure the. Papr Bock and subnrit the sameintheCourtonorbefore`2.5.2000. The leaned District Judge, Special mvision is directed to indovercerffiedtmecopiesofthezrentirere®cordswithinfivedaysto the paties from the date of sifomission Of application for certified =EJL, copies. The leaned District Judge,gspectal Division shall also be informedtytheconcemedpartiesassoonasapplicationforcertified copies are filed. Send back the record of lower Cout forthwith. The learned District Judge, Special Division shall send the record of the case on 15.5.2000.Recordsreceivedtodaybesentbackincourseoftheday. List it on 17.5.2000 for hearfug and diapsal before the Division Bench along with Civil Revision No.4 Of 2000. In case, the "visinBenchcamotbecoustifutedon17.5.2000,thematterbeheard anddiaposeddytheSingleBenchavaifableon17.5.2000.Placeacopyl ofthisorderinthefileofCivilRevisionNo.4of2000. Judge 17.4.2000 in:unEH EfiD EE!h2jNm M. Sarkar, leaned Counsel for the appellant subnrits that some of the articles have been removed from the factory prenrises at hfupur, South Siklin He fairly concedes that inentory of such articleshavenotbeenpreparedLeamedAdvocateGeneralaparing forreapndentNos.1and2hasbroughttgmynoticetheprovisionsof Rules '77, 79 and 95 of Cnder }OH of the Code of Crfu Procedure which`read as follows :- :ag:c::no::,:i:gro •-* E==T*-_ ..-i--.`:--f= -I. -J'- :-i d` - F:.i.O. No.2/2000. £;i/i:l# Doafte Order .Order with Signature `77.Sale ty public auction.-(1)Where movable property is sold by public auction the price of each lot shall be paid at the time of sale or a§ soon after as the gfficer or other person holding the sale directs, and in default of payment the property shall forthwith be re-sold (2)Ch payment of the purchase-money, the officer or other person holding the sale shall grant a receipt for the same, and the sale shall 1]ecome absolute. (3)Where the movable property to be sold is a share in goods belonging to thejudgment-debtor, and a coowner, and two or more persons, of whom one is such coowner, respectively bid the sane sum for such property or for any lot, the bidding shall be deemed to be the bidding of the corowner. 79.Delivery of movable property, debts and shares.il) Where the property sold is movatle property of which actual seizure has been lnade, it shall be delivered to the purchaser. (2)Where the property sold is movable property in the possession of some person otlier than judgmenrdebtor, the delivery thereof to the purchaser shall be made by giving notice to the person in possession prohibiting hin from delivering possession of the property to any person except the purchaser. (3)Whde the property sold is a debt not secued by a negotiable instrument, or is a share in a corporation, the delivery thereof shall be made ty a written order of the Court prohibiting the creditor from receiving the debt or any interest thereon, and the debtor from mating payment thereof to any person. except the purchaser, or prohibiting the person in whose name the share may be standing from mating any transfer of the share to any person except the purchaser, or reeeiving payment of any dividend or interest thereon, and the manager, secretary or othcer proper officer of.the forporatiQn from permitting any such transfer or maldng any such payment to any person except the purchaser. C 95.Delivery Of praperty in ocoupaney of judgmenndebtor.- Where the immovable.property sold is in the occupaney of the judgmenndebtor or of some person on his behalf or of some #;so±ce:tl¥t:unth:rfutictl±¥t¥ftysogheJ:gEeut¥:to: =eng:afininffi#:#=#E¥cati¥:nog¥:edp:c±:,ul:r# delivery to be made ty putting such purchaser or any person whom he may appoint to receive delivery on his' belialf iii` possession of the Foperty, and, if need be, by removing any person who refuses to vacarit th-e. same." 3 Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order # `.:` . . `1 Jrfe\ Order with Signature He sifomits that provision of these Orders and Rules have not been complied with by the Court while passing the order. Since an application for stay has been filed, all these materials are necessary for correct appreciation on the point as to whether stay should be granted in this case or not. MI Wangdi wants to file the objections. Liberty is given to the reapndent Nos. I 'ind 2 to file objections. The sane be filed on or •befo.re 3.5.2000. The appellant may file their reply to the objections on or before 7.5.2000. M. Sarkar wants to move tlle stay application early. List this matter on 8.5.2000 for orders. Copy of this order be served upon Mr. K.T. Bhutia, Advocate, Mr. S.P. Wangdi, Sr. Advocate, M. AK. Upadhayay, Advocate and Mr. 8. Sharma, Advocate. Judge 17.4.2000 2.4 5.2000 Present : Mr. K. T. Bhutia, Advoc`ate for the apellarit. #i€hsrir?.#anmgd±in±::=±=Aav¥¥e for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. a. Sharma, Advocate fior respondent No.3. ¥¥fagan¥gL3Ltdh#¥a:tTidvecate Bi;tg.Bg£L5£k'|Andd¥af:teap£::cant. CMZL 117/2000 --- Mr. S. P. Wangdi,leaned Senior Advcx=ate fairly concedes thac the State Bank of India, the applicant shc*ild be added as respondent No.6 being a necessary par±]r and Mr. Ppadhyaya. Mr. a. Sharma and Mr. K.T. Bhutia leave the matter to the discifetion of :aa:tc:EnN.!itfe6a:si! Q cia I+I:: I irf uh trKqu `` iiiiE ++` , lsr±.T:===``r- T~-'~a=fT~ i ~-. . . , i_ .__-`_- T! .A..O .Z;I 2JJf yi. )rla ` Date .. of •der-` Order ai=' ItI\ 3. 6-8-Zoo Order with Signa'tur.e the CcRIr€. The State Bank o£ Ir]dia be add as respondent. N6.6' su,bfect to the. ob-i,ectio t that may .be .t`aken b-y. the respondents at th time of hearing. e 1€ is mad;e clear that the-.copy the Revision Petition a.rid other will have €o be prepare.a +by -the r-esp.ondent No.6 a€ its cost. It i.s-once again made clear that .adjournlrent ,shall not be :given to any of the parties on the graind thac t applic'ant has been added at a i-at-e stage. This petitioner may take parc in the CMA rio.96 of 2000 on 8.5.2000. -CIA. s`tands- d-isposeq of . + List qrtfro;I:-n':1;=.2%o: before the Division Bench. Present: Mr. K.I,. Bhutia, Advocate fort±he appellant. ~ . .i Mr. S.P. Wart.g§i.. Senior Advocate with Mr. Karma Thinlay, Advocate for respondent Mos.1 and 2. Mr. 8. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. A.K. Upadhyaya. Advocate for respc>ndent No.4. Mr. A. Moulik, Advocate for respondent No.6. On request, the macter be put up on t.he date already fixed that is on Oflice Note as to action (if any) taken `on Order -I, A e'_ -i Serial No. of Order 4. 5. 7-5-2 8.5.20 Order with Signature 00 Present: Mr® K.I. Bhutia. Advocate for the appellant® Mr., S.P. Wangai. Senior Advoca.te with Mr® Karma Thinlay. Advocate for respondent Ncis.tl and, 2. Mr. 8® Sharma®t Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. A.K. Upadh¥aya. Advocate for respondent rwpi.4. Mr® A. Moulik, Advocate for i respondent No.6:. A-_. Put up along with Civil Revision for further hearing. -rrf ,- (R. Dayal) Chief Justice 0 Present : Mr,., K. T. Bhutia. Advocate I or th appellant. #:€hsrirr:®KV£:gd±i±:::i?rA3S:::::e f6r respondent Nos. .1 and. 2. Mr. 8® a.harma, Advocate for respondept No.3. q Mr. A. K. Ui;8a*dhyayat. Advocate for rssEondent, No.4. Mr. a. rdou`lik, Advocate for respondent, lTo`.6. . \` =L-+ Put ub along.with No.4/2000 6n 29.5.2 eb) 18%;g:oo ivil Revision ~£or furtfier.hearing. *,+ Tv cyyLap ( R. Dayal .) c?ff¥u#ce :aagktc;inNo-!itfe6a:S£: Serial No.o Order with Signature ?rder I: Order •6. 29l!.2ooo Present : Mr. Ashoke Kumar Bannerjee, Sr.Counsel with M. K. T. Bhutia and M1. SubirKumar saha, Advocates for the Appellant. M. S. P. Wangdi, Advocate General with M. Karma Thinlay, Asstt.Govt.Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. M. 8. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, Advocate for`respondent No.4. M. A. Mouliky Advocate for respondent Nd.6. Sri A K. Upadhyaya appearing for M/S ITC Limite decree-holder/respondent No.4 has given one bank draft bearin No.'392454' dated 24th May, 2000 for Rs.17,00,0001akhs alupee seventeen lakhs) drawn in favour of the appellant M/S Tripti Ste Traders to Shri K. T. Bhutia, learned Advocate for the auctio purchaser Tripti Steel Traders without prejudice toi the rights an contentions of the decree holder. Learned Counsel for the ,appellant does not press the appea The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. On the request of Sri S. P. Wangdi, learned Advoca General, appearing on behalf of SIDICO, respondent No.1 and Sri Moulik, learned Counsel for the State Bank of India, responde No.6, it is made clear that this order by itself, shall not prejudice t rights and contentions of the alleged mortgagees. Judge 29.5.2000 ( R. Dayal ) Chief Justice. 29.5.2000. Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order iiE