IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12079 of 2009 Between: Md. Abdul Samad S/o. Md. Abdul Hameed R/o. M.G.Nagar, Owaispura, Masabtank, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Officer P.S. Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. VENKATA MAYUR FOR MR.SRIDHAR PEDDAPELLY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents, in altering the Sections and in not proceeding with the investigation in Crime No.37 of 2009 on the file of Humayun Nagar Police Station, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner was, allegedly, kidnapped by one Anwar and his associates on 24-01-2009 On the complaint given by the petitioner’s wife, respondent No.2 registered Crime No.37 of 2009 for offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’). Acting on the said complaint, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Humayun Nagar Police Station, rescued the petitioner from the alleged abductors on 24-01-2009. The petitioner claimed to have approached respondent No.2, disclosed the names of the persons, who abducted him, and made a request to alter the Sections in the said Crime and include the names of the said persons as accused therein. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 has not shown any interest in acceding to his request. In response to the notice of this Court, respondent No.2 filed counter-affidavit. It is inter alia stated that basing on the complaint of the petitioner’s wife, Crime No.37 of 2009 was registered under Section 363 IPC; that the petitioner was rescued from the clutches of six persons, who were shown as accused therein and that out of the said six persons, accused Nos.1, 2 and 6 were arrested and other accused are absconding. It is further stated that the Investigating Officer recorded the confessional statements of A.1, 2 and 6, remanded them to Judicial custody and altered the provisions of Law to Sections 363, 342, 324, 382 and 511 read with Section 34 IPC. It is further stated that respondent No.2 also mentioned the names of the abductors in the remand case diary and that he is taking efforts to trace the other accused and conduct the investigation in an impartial manner. Having regard to this above stand taken by respondent No.2 in his counter-affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to complete the investigation in the above-said Crime and file appropriate charge sheet/report therein, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.15576 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 21st July, 2009 lur