cyK^i P SIFMIll Sltijisl-l: esEswi Cf(& 0-T) IN THE HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR &.[^.. PETITIONERS: WRITj'ETITiON (S1NQ, . .^, ta_.l. J. .J2Q07_ Juthel Yadav S/o Motiram age 5^(years Ramcharan S/o Amoli sahu age 54 years Dhaniram S/o Khedan satnaini age 50 years Rameswar S/o Jawaher chandra age 53 years Mahetar S/o Shanker age 50 years Rajju S/o Kaahaiya age 54 years Keja D/o Cheturam age 52 years Girdhari S/o Khelan age 54 years Ram Awtar S/o Baba sahu age 47 years Bbagwat S/o Ramadhin.age 48 years Kapil S/o Ramcharan satnami age 41 years Jaleswar S/o Gangaram Chuhan age 40 years Kanhaiya S/o Vishnu Kewat age 47 years Ishwari S/o Baisakhu sahu age 49 years Rarnu S/o Sukhru age 47 years Ifif^ Tiblu S/o Kejauage 48 years All working as Gangmen PWD Under, S.D.0. PWD, Kawardha C/o Sub- Divisional Officer, PWD, Kawardha, Distt- Kabirdham [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1] 2] State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Public Works Deptt. Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan-Raipur (C.G.) Sub- Divisional Officer, PWD, Kawardha Distt- Kabirdham [C.G.j WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTIONOFJND1A Xt-HC-78 sn^Twf^ira; W 5h*f , p'^ ^'^ NINCIT a»*rr^ a-af •*l\Wi,^W14, Rdltfy );£'.^iA:^y.4....^ 200^° 3ii^i'i <<a«n (llcll4'!l<ilSl) SRiraTdfeTaii^r ';ni<if<l41-l ii*(MTfffei<n <fawi< tTTsn^r 1.2.2007 Mr. AAok Vaishnav, coijnsel for the petitioners. . Arvind Oubey, Pone With the eonsent of lawyer for the r-espondents/State. leamed counse! for-the parties, the matter is heard finally and di^possd of. CommQFi order dictated passed separately. A copy of this order petitions. inW.P. No. 3147 of 2004 in open Court-. be placed ori record in connected wrH' Sd^. SatishK.. Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHH/tTTISSARH AT BIUtSPUR W. P. No. 3147 of 2004 Petitioner : Suclhrom Versus Raspondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P. No. 3188 of 2004 Petitioner : Mohit Raro Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarfi ond oinother W. P. No. 3279 of 2004 Petitioner : Durdeshi Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgar+i and another W. P. No. 4929 of 2004 Petitioners : Shobha Ram cnd others Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarii and ano-tfier W. P. No. 4830 of 2004 Petitioner ; Johan Bijhwar Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P. No. 5027 of 2004 Petitioners : LeelaBai ond another Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarii ond onother W. P. No. 1103 of 2005 Petitioners ; Bajrdia gam ond othars Versus Responcfents : State of Chhattisgarh cmd others And W. P. fsl No. 614 of 2007 Petitioners : Ju'thel Yactav and olhers Versus Respondents : State of Chhatl-isgarh and another y-' SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agmhotri. J Mr. Ashok Vaishnav, counsel for Ihe petitioners. Mr. Arv'md Dubey, Panel Lawyer for •the respondents/State. OROER (Passtsd on l*t day of FebnKxry, 2007) The following order of the Court- is possed by Satish K. ^gnthotri. J. 1. Leomed counsel oppearing for the petitioners as wetl as teamed Penel lawyer appearing for •the respondents/Stcrte jointly submit •that the foct's of the present case are simitar to that of in W. P. No. 454/2005 / (Ram Prasad Yactav & others vs. Sta-te of Chhnttisgarh & others), which was ollowed vide order dnted 4.1.2007. They furl+ier submit that the question of kw»involved is also the same. 2. In view of •the above stated submisa'ons inade by leamed counsel for the part-ies, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order ckxted 4.1.2007 passed by this Court m W. P.No. 454/2005. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be plcued on record in connected writ petitions. Sd/- . SarishK. Bablu Judge