IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.846 of 2010 ANIL PANDEY @ CHHOTAN PANDEY, SON OF LATE NAWAL KISHORE PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHAGWANPUR, P.S. SAHEBGANJ, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. ----- PETITIONER. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM BABU PANDEY, SON OF LATE RAGHUNATH PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHAGWANPUR, P.S. SAHEBGANJ, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. -------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the petitioner : Shri Krishna Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate For the State : Smt. Anita Kumari, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 13.08.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 2.11.2009 by which the Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C. – 5, Muzaffarpur has allowed the prayer of prosecution to examine three more witnesses in Sessions Trial No. 601 of 2006. On going through the impugned order, I find that the order suffers from no infirmity and it was the trial court which was of the view that these witnesses be examined in the ends of justice and, therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)