Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Civii Revision No. 184 of200i Ms. Lucky Bharat Garage Private Limited, M.G. Road, Raipur, Tahsil&Distirct.Raipur (Claimants) 1. Smt Rukhmani, widow of Late Dushyant Kumar Dohre, aged about 26 years 2. Kumari Durga Dohre, daughter of Late Dushyant Kumar Dhore,aged about 06 years 3. Kumari Simran Dohre, daughter of Late Dushyant Kumar Dohre, aged about 03 years 4. Yuvraj Dohre, son of Late Dushyant Kumar Dohre, aged about 2 years. Nos.2 to 4 are minors through their natursl guardian respondent No.l-Mother 5. Binda Bai, wife of Shobharam Dohre, aged about 55 years. 6. Shobharam Dhore, son of Late Ankat Ram Dohre, aged about 60 years 7. Satar Bai, son of Shobharam Dohre, aged about 40 years Ali residents or'Road No.6, Quarter No.6/D Sector-4, Bhilai Bhatti, Tehsil & District Durg 8. Dashrath Sahu, son of Virendra Sahu alias Khodu, aged about 40 years, resident of Village Lasatola, Post Baiod, P.s. Arjunda, District Durg Present: Shri Devarshi Thakur, counsei for the petitioner. (Passedon08.12.2008) Heard on admission. (2) Brief facts are that in claims case No. 31/2006, the 9 Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (FTC) Durg passed an award dated 13.09.2006 fastening liability on the appiicanfowner to pay compensation of Rs. 4,67,500;'-. During execution ofthe avi/ard by the respona'ents No.1 to 7 and almost a year after the award was passed, the applicant/owner, vrithout deposifing any amount awarded against him in the Tribunal, moved an appiication under Article 126 of C O'KdcJ —^ -S-- Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of CPC for payment of the amount awarded by the Tribunal in instalments of Rs.10,000/- per month. (3) The Executing Court has, by the impugned order, dlsmissed the said application. (4) I have perused the grounds mentioned in the application fiied by the applicant and the 'well reasoned order passed by the Executing Court and am of t'ne considered opinion that no iilegality or jurisdictional error is seen so as to justifs' any interference. The revision being v/ithout substance is dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge 'riya t?':'^-'.-^-^'