IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32708 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- U.M.SREELATHA, W/O.P.V.KRISHNAN, AGED 32 YEARS, JUNIOR HINDI TEACHER (FULL-TIME) A.U.P.SCHOOL,NHANGATTIRI, THRITHALA EDUCATIONAL SUB DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.] 4. THE MANAGER, A.U.P.SCHOOL, NHANGATTIRI, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD-679311. 5. THE HEADMASTER, A.U.P.SCHOOL, NHANGATTIRI, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD-679311. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.32708/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the teacher working in an School, of which the 4th respondent is the Manager and the 5th respondent is the Headmaster. According to the petitioner due to a management dispute, though appointment was approved probation was not declared. It is stated that, though he moved the AEO invoking the power under rule 6(e) of chapter XIV-A KER, the AEO returned the request by Ext.P4. This lead the petitioner to file Ext.P5 revision before the first respondent and in this writ petition, what is mainly complained of is the delay in taking up and considering Ext.P5. Ext.P5 being a statutory revision, the first respondent is bound to consider the same. 2 Therefore, I direct that the first respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 revision filed by the petitioner with notice to her and the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3