CR No. 4448 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No. 4448 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2010 Aditya Tuli ....Petitioner Versus Makhan Lal ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. D.K. Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Challenge in the present revision is to the order dated 31.5.2010 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar. Brief facts of the present case are that the landlord – respondent herein filed petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for ejectment of the tenant - revisionist herein from the tenanted portion, fully described in the eviction petition. As per landlord, rent from 1.7.2006 is due and outstanding against the tenant – defendant and he has made himself liable to be evicted on the ground of non-payment of rent. Landlord has also taken other grounds for eviction of CR No. 4448 of 2010 2 the tenant. Defendant – tenant has not denied that the rate of rent is Rs.6,000/- per month. The Rent Controller vide impugned order dated 31.5.2010 has assessed the rent @ Rs.6,000/- per month with effect from 1.7.2006 to 30.11.2009, amounting to Rs.2,46,000/- and interest Rs.25,836/- plus costs Rs.1,000/-, in total amounting to Rs.2,72,830/-. In view of the admitted fact that agreed rent is Rs.6,000/- per month and tenant could not produce any receipt of payment of rent with effect from 1.7.2006, there seems to be no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Petition is devoid of merit and hence is dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 20.07.2010 sk.