IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 9th day of April, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 268 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Dinesh Chandra @ Dinesh Ram & Another .….Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 38/2010, U/s 304B IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Thana Kapkot, Tehsil Kapkot, District Bageshwar. April 9, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Hariom Bhakuni, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicants submitted that he does not want to press the bail application of applicant no. 1 Dinesh Chandra @ Dinesh Ram. Hence, bail application of applicant no. 1 is dismissed as not pressed. Learned Counsel for the accused applicants submitted that applicant no. 2 Bhawan Ram is father-in-law of the deceased and no specific allegation against the present applicant accused Bhawan Ram is made for demand of dowry and he is an old man ailing with serious diseases. He is in jail since 9.3.2010 and he has got no previous criminal history. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant no. 2 deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant no. 2 Bhawan Ram be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 9.4.2010 PRABODH 2