IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17500 of 2010 1. SHEO NATH @ GIDU YADAV @ SHEO NATH SINGH @ GIDU SINGH, SON OF BHIGUR YADAV. 2. TEJ NARAIN YADAV @ TEJ NARAIN SINGH, SON OF SHEO NATH @ GIDU YADAV @ SHEO NATH SINGH @ GIDU SINGH. Both residents of Village – Chotki Haradia, P S – Jagdishpur, District-Bhojpur. _______ Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ________ Opposite party ----------- 03. 11.5.2011 Prayer for bail of the petitioners was earlier rejected by this Court looking at the nature of the allegation made in the FIR. The offence primarily related to sections 447, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration that petitioners have been in custody since 23.7.2009 and there is no overt act on the part of the petitioners as such and a commitment made at the bar by the counsel for the petitioners that petitioners will not in any manner jeopardize the rest of the trial, if enlarged on bail, let the petitioners Sheo Nath @ Gidu Yadav @ Sheo Nath Singh @ Gidu Singh and Tej Narain Yadav @ Tej Narain Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in Jagdishpur P S Case No.86 of 2009. One of the sureties will be executed by the so-called cousin brother of petitioner No.1 namely, Sona Yadav who has sworn the affidavit and another by a close relation. 2 It is made clear that after being released the petitioners on bail, if they in any manner interfere with the course of justice or for smooth conduct of trial, then the trial court will have liberty to take the privilege of bail granted to the petitioners. Petitioners must appear on each and every date in person before the trial court on the date fixed by it till the completion of the trial. Any default will also be viewed as a breach of the conditions. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)