IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 19959 of 2008 Between: Sam Luxury Homes Owners Association, Rep by its Secretary, Mohd. Shoukathullah, S/o. Mohd.Ahmedullah, aged 54 years, Business, R/o. Flat No.102, H.No.8-2-293/82/F II/B24, Rd # 3 Filmnagar, Phase II Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation, Hyderabad. 2 M/s MAS Consultants Repudiated Builders, Rep by its Managing Director, Aminuddin Saleem, S/o. Mohinuddin, R/o. Pent House H.No.8-2-293/82/F II/B24, Rd # 3 Filmnagar, Pahse II Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 1st respondent for not disposing of the representation 07.06.2008 according to law is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the representation according to law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAJENDRA BUSSA Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR MCH CIRCLES 3&5)KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent is making unauthorized construction and though the said fact was brought to the notice of the 1st respondent-Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad by giving a representation on 7.6.2008, so far, no action has been initiated. Hence, he approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent-Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of at the admission stage, without notice to the 2nd respondent. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the said representation dated 7.6.2008 given by the petitioner at the earliest, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Before considering the said representation, as this Court dispensed with the usual notice to the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent shall afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the 2nd respondent, so that he can ventilate his grievance. No costs. __________ 10-12-2008 rkk