IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P.(T) No. 1947 of 2008 Decided on 20th September, 2010. Dhale Ram. ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant the work charged status to the applicant as such with effect from 1.1.2002 with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back arrears of salary, pay fixation and the seniority etc. with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum.” 2. In the preliminary submissions of the reply, it is stated at para 4 as follows: “4. That the applicant had worked on seasonal works or works which were temporary works and were abandoned from time to time and were not regular works, then, as per para 6 of the scheme, the same could not be applied to the applicant and the OA deserves dismissal and the applicant is not entitled to benefits of Mool Raj Upadhayaya’s case.” 3. In case the petitioner has any factual dispute or still any grievance left, it will be open to the petitioner to pursue the 2 same before the first respondent, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent within a period of another four months. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 20th September, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge