vr rr(« rm ‘ ‘ f The peu‘tioner Was an employee 70f the M.P. State Cooperative i Marketing Federation Limited, which had terminated his services. That ’was challenged before the M.P. High Court by way of l Misc.P.T.No.383/ 1985 ’(B.K. Gupta —‘ Vs — M.P. State .Coopelative Marketing Federation Ltd. and ano1her)’which was allowed and the order of termination was set aside and the petitioner was ordered ‘ to be, reinstated. That Was done.‘ As regards back Wages,‘ in View . E .of the factual aspects involved, the Conrt had given liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum 'for relief. The Ipetih‘oner had accordingly moved the Deputy’ Registrar, : iCooperative Society, who on 29-11-2001 has \allowed‘ 'his éapplication and ordered the employer to pay to the petitioner a P W m . w v/wav'mt Wk ...............................................w5}................................................ 31%: a? ’ K / W:W 1? IE‘UTW ’ farm mmmw ";,: J“ 3‘ R q "m wg: ma _ r 29-10-2002 Shn' Prashant Jaiswal with Shri Gurmit Singh Ahluwalia, counsel for the petitiéner. : “(’34 Heard on the qxitstion of admission. Having heaxd learned counsel for the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to entextain this writ petition. CQPND73¢WPL m qiZGO mmmafa/x/ -( $w‘wqaaéw I sum of Rs.2,78,255. 10 along with intsrest and cost'by way ofback wages. It appeals that after ob ' g the order, the peu'tioner has not taken any steps for getting i executed. He. has, however, Waited for some time and now pproached this Court for a ¢,1 Re pondent No.1 direction to e W to make th payment KKWEIJt 1s not disputed by learned counsel that e order has to be executed and in case the petitioner has not tak 11 any steps in that regard, he has to thank himself for the delay. The proceedings under Article se of executing the order of the I l Deputy Regisnar. If so advised, 'e peh‘h‘oner may approach the 226 cannot be utilized for the purp appropn'ate fomm for getting the order executed in accordance with law and in case such proceed gs are initiated, they shall be ' disposed ofwithin a reasonable pe d. With the aforesaid observatio s the petition stands disposed of. I Consequently, IkA Nos 2121/?2002 and 5396/ 2002 stand dlsposed of i Sd/— P.C.Naik i x I i t t ; 1 Judge , Xl-HC—22'