3 x.\^l. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.4 ~? 2Z>/2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^•':'.- ^'^^. %^^' \ Arun Kumar Pandya,. S/o late Shri Ram Shankar Pandya, aged about 53 years, C/o Dr. Vaman Rao Khapre, infront of Darripara, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham. VERSUS S ...^yvPt^' ^1] state of Chhattisgarh, through ,.-^w^ the Secretarv. Trit ^2] ^3] .-4] 5] 6] the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. The Collector, Kawardha, District Kabeerdham. District Coordinator [Tribal Welfare] Kawardha, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bodla, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. District Education Officer, Kawardha, The Principal, Government Hjgh School, Chilfi, District Kawardha [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2r26/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^L._._._.,. 3TT^^T€l3Tl^Tf<S? ^T3n^$T?CTW ^e^ ;^Tro7WT, yTyi^<i<$, tera^ Hli^ic'yT 9?*1fc|3 - -^ --- .^.«.'.7-.-,,7i. .l. iT^,.. „.... . 3n^$Tq^{?(<^f36T5) ^2003 5T?ITWr^rfS?T3TT^$T <t<l-yfri^') Hl^riT<ft^i<a <Rl^K ^3rf^T3n^?T 13.10.2005 Shri Utkarsh Verma, cc^ Shri Vivek Sliaraia, Pa| copy. Meard, This wiit petition has t of suspeusioii dated 13.9.2C| for tiie pe.titioneri subniits suspeiisiori order dated 13) servecl with. aiiy charge sh| siibmits fhat m. fact, fhe petitioner.. He furtlier subm^.' [uiisel for fhe. Petitioner. |ael Lawyer for the State. 011 advance teen filed agamst fhe impugned order p2 (AiTiiexure P-3). Leaiiied coiuisel pliat after passuig of • the impugned |9,2002 the petitioner has not been ^et. wliatsoev^ir_it m.ay be. He also S^et' 'harge,has not been issued to the ts that even aite.r lapse of siich a long period tlie petitioner is 3iot b.^ing allowe.cl in his services, Leanie.cl cotinsel for ttje petitiouer prays th.at for the present, this petition inay be dispos^d of wifh a Hberty to tlie petitioB.e.r to file. a detailed representatioj .tlie .concenied authori.tv m.^ wrthio. the stipulated perio{l graiite.cl by fhis coiirt, This Uiaite.d prayer made by leained coi(insel-for •the. petitioner is not op.posed by leained. State .Counsel. Prayer is allowed, [i before fhe concemed' authority ancl iy be directed to dispose of the same 'It'is directecl • fhat if so advised, the petitioner, may file -a cletailed representation. raisliig all his giievaiices withiri a period of 4 we.eks from today alougw|tli certtfied copy of tliis order aiid copy .o.f tliis writ petition and SP/FS/2005-20,000 siich a represeiitation is filed'by tlie 15 *11+101 9?<TT^ ^wf •^qi<||rt'4,tPT^1x-l<l<i»,Rlowy<< •••»••» TTiB«<l«««»«»«««BnBliBrf»nBBBa»Biia Wt200^ 31T^^rR^ ^CTT"^rf)^icb y^y ^, p^i 3TT^5T q^cp (tjcrfg^) '' g^TTSR^rfln OT^^T -z- petitioner the concenie.d, aid <PI<4lo<Tll <1I*1oV^I^^£lxRrt^t^ ^^rf^TOT^^T [fchQrity shaU dispose of fhe same as e.arly as possible/wlthiii/a Iperiocl of 8 weeks from the date of receipt/ filiiig of flie seid repi-j V^itli tlie aibresaid ob dispo.sed of C.C. as per rules, 'sentation. ^ervatious, this petitiou sts-iicls fiiiaily Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 /^ .