1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY : AURANGABAD BENCH Writ Petition No. 1723 of 2007 Rukhmini d/o. Dnyandeo Kolhe- - - Petitoner versus The State of Maharashtra and others.- - Respondents Shri B. R. Sontakke Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Shri K. M. Babhulgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri Govind Wattamwar, Advocate holding for Shri S. G. Rudrawar, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. Dated : 27th July 2009 PER COURT : 1. Learned Counsel for the petitoiner submits that in view of the alternate remedy available to the petitioner before the Divisional Commissioner, the petitioner does not press the petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternate remedy before the Divisional Commissioner. 2. It is made clear that the period during which the petition was 2 being prosecuted would be taken into consideration by learned Divisional Commissioner while entertaining the appeal filed by present petitioner. 3. In case the petitioner takes recourse to the alternate remedy, the Divisional Commissioner shall dispose of the appeal if filed by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of presentation. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J. ) ( B. R. GAVAI, J. ) pnk/wp172307