1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2640 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Amit Sale for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Kadam i/b Mr. Pratap Patil for respondent no.1. Ms. A.T. Jhaveri, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a dispute between the husband and wife. The trial court has directed the petitioner husband to deliver the ornaments which have been held to be the property of the respondent. The trial court has also allowed the maintenance for a period of 3 months during the Iddat period only. The revisional 2 court has confirmed the order of the trial court. 3. The finding recorded by the two courts below regarding ownership of the ornaments and the possession thereof with the petitioner is a finding of fact. In the absence of any perversity, the concurrent finding of fact recorded by the two courts below cannot be interfered with in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. There is no merit in the writ petition which is hereby dismissed summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)