IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16552 of 2010 RAMASHRAY YADAV @ RAMASHRAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.06.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant and counsel for the State. This is the third attempt of the petitioner in order to seek bail in a case instituted under sections 364A, 302/34 of Indian Penal Code. His second attempt was considered and disposed of by order dated 23.12.2008 (Annexure-1/A). Considering all aspects of the matter, it was observed in the last paragraph of the said order as under: “It appears that the petitioner is in custody since 21st April, 2007. Having regard to the said fact, this court only observes that in the event trial of this case is not taken up within nine months from today the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.” Status report was called for which is placed at Flag-X. It appears therefrom that eight (08) prosecution witnesses including the Investigating Officer had already been examined. Six (06) witnesses are yet to be examined. Learned counsel for the informant, on the other hand, states that only doctor is now left to be examined. Petitioner seems to be in custody since 21.4.2007. Having considered the submission and after going through the materials on record, this Court while declining the prayer of the petitioner, disposes of this application in the following manner: 2 Let the Trial Court endeavour and examine the remaining prosecution witnesses within two months from the date of receipt/communication of the order in the Court below failing which the petitioner shall have liberty to renew his prayer for bail. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )