XI-HC—78 WWW g mWWW /8‘Z? /0f mam-(W) WWW WWW WW§WW égwf§u3n§$ hr‘ smsh 5‘1 W‘sta '2 , caumei fer :he petm‘oner. Shré Satish Gupta: Dep Aty Govt. Advocate far the State. :1 WC nntmon, the pet'tione! has quesiigned iegaiiiy, propyiéty and ccrrectness of the order data Thu-v.” Aqn xu eJA’W. whersby tha ’D n discantimed the servmes cf t. a getiticner aiong wiih a 0th 7r empicyees af Mahiia Evam Bai ‘v'skas Eepart‘ment in compiiance of he Govamment order dated it?“ Nevember 1997‘ The ietzer Amexure 12 dated 27—34%, which has been made nasis. cf abcve, immgned 9rd r emésagaa tha‘: in varic-us department5 the sealants we wcrking m reject Qffécer‘ DWCRA 'a5pur, I f'.nmn a Wig my :aari’n ,1 nar€ pvsw A i‘c m. “in-” irh ic w oujectmnabSe an the grcu f finahcgai d;scmihm therefo: , a:% the cieyari‘meriis we're dirésii’ed t6 evi‘ew arid ascerfai‘ri that {mi'y' $aia'ry $h‘3uid working mo e than the aancm ec‘ Des 5 3na § fmmediaieiy be terminaz‘ea T'rie ciaSe 01 the petiii ner és thai imtiaiiy she wag appainted by rewandent No.2 Vida erder d ted 2E1. 1-91 on menthh/ rate on the vacént )_ é i. 1r > L . ”w u m u,; am?mm numwm ma; H‘N-n mm: u. yi i‘xfHEtiOii ‘33: dav41 tun-la vva: i’l u cak In sefvice. The peiiiiener coninued ‘Io werk anti an acccunt 0f being cominuousiy warked as an e picyee, the petitioner became a temmrary empioyee and thereafier ame entitied to be dedared germanem emgleyee. vide n *‘er dated 18 8-1? servmee m“ i h mrag $1mlrlahk/ riiebnrvlanuczd um hQJ‘ thy h 1 av“: nrdnr ulnafragunr and, “my yuvvv‘ .1‘ ' 1g T A m— ‘£ «v. A Awe—”J la t‘;~!}chtuf and the Egiiegwr bae’Sed an er on J- i 3‘3 i’nai i'ne peiiiioner be iaken back in eervice. The Qetition r was taken pay: cr Aaya, was Annex 're 4--“ - an-" mcmwgt u .1. vvaCai’tt .g. A yGat. I. A mm xuv vv‘ Wunuut. n. uwnly w. u... any A ‘ uyyOi'tuHit‘y M... .. ‘ . I: a y: mun Y IvBi’caclucu Lu Lnc Vu: u neck in service and she wee a — J m n — Cu ‘i‘ b * . XI—HC-78 o .o.o.o.oooo.oooooo.o. mm,m,m / .& mmmafawr) mam WWW mmm vb?# ‘ WW§WW %3I%H3TI%3T ‘ sentkfi.J§;§gggxlgere she worked against the vacant pest. On 22-12-93‘ she ’ fracture. therefare. she couid net attend the office and an appiication for grant of ‘eave was sent. However: when the petitéonerwent to ioin hm dln‘ias‘ she was ngi aiiowwi fn join, therefnre, the petitioner mcvad tha Labcur Cam and the Labour Court vids order dated 1342a§€ JL.‘ .L‘J L £ (’- $ - . JJ uucczw u: ram: xhc penthne‘ back in $erv5ce with back wages‘ Cmy af ‘zha judgment i5 Ahnexure—AI'E . The peiiironer is entitled to be deCiaraci a5 quaa’ cermanenz. an 4=3~97, respondent No.2 directed the Superintendent at Janjgir to ‘iake the oetitioner back. in service in vtew nf the Labaur Cnurt judgment. The petitiener wee again meted \Iide order need 3-4-Q?. The Cetieeto' passed an arder regarding nesting of the w yeuuvncl $Nt§a Av 0n g2 v‘u-gr. C l Tl-‘A J ”v S"$ $ r €Gvvunnen; \IAvnM raw uau kA-‘l ;rGlmdtatcu r t ‘Ad a guitwv Ahvut \vguQ 1A its meme cieted $4 -9Q in reg iiarize the eerviees er’ deity wage empio‘y‘eee. The appointment ef the petiti ner wee made an vacant pest. Thereafter‘ on 27"” March 1995 a circuia was issuea on the ground that the persena are being apneinted in exce‘ s of sanctianed nest. Méeinterpreting and ignering the order c?“ High Cr.“ Ir‘t Mien 13-10-94 passed in WPV Ne 923.1% Vipla owdnr daiwrl ') C‘ 99 th luv nu: :nvu a-v- ervices cr’ the netitiener were term'nated treating uer L $to we i. a daiiy wag r empieyee Cepy 0f the order i=3 Annexure- N13. The petitiener submi eci a repreeentation etating that Similariy situated emniovee nameiv . $arewati 3am: who was working as Aava has been granted reguiar pay scaie and she is stiii continuing. Therefore, the impugned order be quas, ed and reanondenrs he directed to coneider the ease cf the petitioner for uiarization. Return has been3fiied n behaif ef the Siate/reeecncient stating that return fiieci in 0A. M3229 [$9 and avermente made thereunder are adopted, There is no aanct oned est of n eat Lt e S t r. \ A ‘ i,XIV-Hc-,7,8,,r i 7*ri, ,ir 7; i) , i J, XI-HC-78 . WW a 200 WW(W) XI-HC-78 WW,WW,W o ooo..o..ooooo.ooooooo mmw‘awf) WWW wmm WW&‘WW WWW ”4" é;a'x%w:m%¥r after 89 days. However, as 3er the averments made in the peiition, the [waéti " petitioner's $ewices were Giswntinued )n the year 1933 when $he was absent. She approached the Labour Court and the Labour Court by ex- parte order dated 13-12% allowed the anhlisadon of the petiticner as ncne appeared en behait‘ cf the State and direeted tor reinstatement cf the petéticruer, therefere, in the ye: t 1997 ae per the Celtectet’s order she was attawed ta jain. However. t‘re 3uperintendent, Chitd aanrakahan Grih, Janjgir vide crder Annexure-HS dated 1‘9«3-=97 reiieved the petitioner en the ground that onty twe sarctioned posts are there which are aiready tilted. Ham/ever. vide ard dated 22-3~9_7 the Addltlenal Ce.leetor, Bilaepur sent the order te e Superlhtehdent, Bel ganrakehen Grih, Jeni-air re erring the Labeur rt judgement te take the eetitiener en uuty d a arm-t th eutsuance 0t that the eetitieher reported on the duty eh t$~o~m under Annexure-Fv'a Vi order Anenxureevg dated 6587 the Aaditionat Collector. Snaseur osted the petitioner in the he: Sanrakehah Grih; Bilaspu‘r against the st of Sedan $evek until further orders. Ultimateh in View of the Qev rhmeht order dated 2?!“ March QQ treating the petitioner as excess and at; ointe agai et the permanent regutar eve-st and her eervieee were teh :tnated trader Ahhe‘xure-NB. Perusal of the above r cord shows that initially the petitioner was aooointed for a period of 5? 'ays temporaritv based on the monthtv rate fixed by the Collector. it wa mentioned that the appointment is totatty temporary and her services ca . be terminated without any prior notice in the first appointment order no hing is mentioned that she was appointed egaihet e “a me permanent {egu (n ‘l'r ‘01 .w. u; nn-v o‘‘‘i‘a a~1dn m eoet and thereafter there is no order wuicn in k ehowa that the appointment or‘ the petitioner wee made against any permal’lem regular pO5I. heretore. the petitioner wee appointed D (i) e. . C- u d .o n t XI-HC-78 HW,WI§,W o ..oo.o.o~oo.o.oo..o~o WW(WW) mam mmm WWW§WW éaweméw mmmm »§’ .ernporaniy and however her <ervices were centinued. in the meantime, gag» V 3he cbtamed the /order ¥r0m he Labour Coun agains: the Government in which the department remained Lin-represented and ex-parte order wee she wee never appointed and against regu!ar pas: and that why her services were discentinued as per the Gavernment ora‘er dated 2 én ihe recent judgment of Consiiiuticn Banish of the Hcn‘bie Apex COUVT m the matter Of $$Cary, §Iate 0f Kanmtak§ a¥id 0thef3 \i Umedevi (3} and others re the Aex Crt has heid that: u u nmmri _‘_ h MmmL nn Ivmlhu ca rf r‘ied in (2QG5) 4 SCC 1 e ie clear t at adherence to the ruée cf equality in pubiic empioy t is a basic feaiure cf am Canetitution and nce the mle 9f law ie the mre 0f our ie Ceneiétution, a curi weuid ceriaémy be dieabied fmm passing an order uphoiding a viaiation cf Anicie 14 or m cra‘erina t. e ncckina of the need ta cemew w%th kc‘C ne feedirwemente ef Amme 14 reaci with Amae'w of me Censtitution Therefore, consietent with the scheme for publ empioyment, this Sourt Whiie iaying dawn the 'aw he necessariiv fo hnld the Heieec the appmntmeni 15 m fmS CF me ralevam fuiee aria aner a ereper comeetliio . among quehfed eereone *he same wewd net eenfer ry' right cm the appemtee :f §t %e a caneaetuai appc tment, the apoou‘m‘em wr‘es ii) an end at the e ef the seetrect $f k were an engagement or a paintment on daiiy wagee or casua! basis, the same wouid ceme to an end when h is discontinued. S iariy, a iemporary empioyee couic‘ net cieim te be ede permanent an the exeiry ef his ierm cf appcintnt. it hae aiee to be ciarified than mereiv because tempurarv empiovee or a casual wage'workér ie c ntinued far a time beyonu ‘he germ of hie apneiniment ne wouic.‘ not be e'i led to be abserbe" in *e‘u‘av eerviee er wade permanen: mere on the srenth or sucn contl A A i p p au m n .i e e i . B r i ‘ n i i in i n XI-HC-78 @W,W,W . a1 00 man-H175 2 WW(W) Wam‘ WWW /£ # WW§WW mafa‘aw aa%uan%31 apwe a e foi a d eriginai pointnt ws nt made by liewng ue pracess f se!tian a envisaged by the raQevnt mies it is t pen te ccur‘ to revent regular recruitme t te instance prary mpiee whcseperéd 9f mpioymen haa m to n nd 0r f ad hoc empys ho y the vw nature o e appointmnt d n asquirs an rigt. he; High Courts actin e: Artici 22 er“ the Cmtituiiom sheuid not ord rm; iue directn fer absarptian reguiarizatia ni inuac uni i‘ne g’gwuitmen i : de ry n m§ Q the canstituia 5 ee§ e an empioye h id under ovr of an re 0 th ccurt, hich e have e$¥ibd a$ "!3iigé§.:s empioymet“ i e ear ar th jucint. wsuld t b h ta be aorb o made eranen in e fag c a, the Hig ur e be iis n isng inierim eiifeciie, ice a ii, if uiiieiy‘ iiie empic‘y‘ee approaig t foun ti reif i ma e ecsaibie fcr t ta h e a mannr :ha uitimateiy n pe ce i e use to i. i judg et . a bd tht: n para-45 of the n it 5 been oeewe a Jhiie directin that appointments, temneraiy e casuai, be regui rizeci or made permanent, ihe caun‘s are swayed by t e feci that the person concerned nae i rc-rked fer s ' time and i some cases fer a considerabie ien th cf time. if. is net e5 if the persen who accepte an engagement either temperary or _casuai in natur. is not aware of the nature 0f his Vernpicyrnent. H accepts the ernpioyment vii open eyes. it inay b true that he is net in a‘poeition to ‘ bargain - net at e m‘s iength= since he mieht have been searching for so i e empioyment $0 as t6 eke out his iiveiihagd anti ents whatever he gets. But on that gmund eiane, it ouid not be appropriate to jettison the eonstitutionai er: eme of appointment to take the View % (3 e‘: s a m ‘é to h t p nt a h of temo eoys o at ace a a c mee W b e f thw e o et y h T g u‘d e $ o i. a ss ios , m a. permaen sentne ess t t If way mae égmarl ad in tar f tn : c. eme. Mry becaus e ad c .tnue ce odr f e w w dce e n n h me pt cf e gme he m e e. Med to any rigt bsed r pmt th service. in ctin suh cses h Cot _ ay nt iffiee‘ i eui 'rie 5’r1 fter a ima chn i i d eniied to ie, t y b i uouid te riief in such e t c rj di wii b cad hm “ r o e - a t XI-HC-78 WW,W,W o .oo.oo'oco.‘ooooo...o Wm<W> mm WW WW§wW ém§mméw mmmm Jp— empéoyed Shsuid be directed to be continues! permanently. As ‘as been observarj above, 5n the present ase‘, the peSitmner 3 haS net been abie t0 es:ab§ sh th t her apcci. tmen‘: was againe: reguiar msi The epecintment r3? r Amexm’e-N‘a ehews that §1er eppoiwimem was gureiy temgcrary fer pericd‘ of gg deys. 3he was eiiewed is ccn‘kinue fey one cr the oher reasen and as per éhe findmg cf the Censtitutiaru gar-ch judgmenv that deee mt §§ve §1er r§ght ée be r’gu;ar§zeu t .J er ceniinued ferever. :‘ne Gwemmeni cf Madhya Pradesh aiier {eviewing and reaiizmg that m verie 's departments numbere 0f empicyeee ere werking mm'e ihan the s nciioned poete whieh affeets the financiai erer’ere, passed tne arde; Aenexure-Nm very deeaximeni shcuid rewew the peemw ead if any emebyee ie few d m excess ef the sanct§eneei east, ihen he} ehe shauid be disconiinuee‘. Aceem’mgiy, ihe eetitieeer‘e serviees were we §med COUh$€ m(n m .,nI c: m :s .4 .. m 3c n g" dame-hi. m {Dara—‘34. hes h id ieai: so da :fied that those decis‘éans which ma saunter t0 ihe wincieie sei€€ed En this e'edeien, c,“ m Which direct§e e runnine saunter re what we have held herein, am e§and Bderruded‘ of their statue ae p?%$e(!en1’8." 3 Therefgre. en ihe sirengt‘n a the Labeur Ceuri‘e judgmeni ihe peia‘iiener is not enritiee' t0 centinue. a W ;...‘. e h l XI-HC-78 :§ammmmn§%mwa$$mm§ WWW /%P’ WW§WW %s1%mn%¥r As far a5 ether argu getitionef that similai‘lv situate granted regmar pay scaie anc reccrd which 5hsws tha: hsw the facts af her ca$e, whetmr atherwise, iherehre, the peiit strength cf Smt. Sarswaii 3a? aéiowed t0 conimue. eV% iher r: that gmund the petitioner the decision of tha Constitutic fnwed hereiw‘m" if: View sf the a‘smve, i same 5s devoid of merit and t herebv dismissea. ¢ .ooooo.o.ooooo..ooooo ‘ mmmahwr) ment raiaed by barneG‘ ‘ceunsei for the i emniovee mameiv Sm: SarswaE Sana wag she is stiil centinui'ng in s’erviee mder the mug an ‘ahe wa$ aibwsd to centinua and what w5re m‘xanemy n paar 9‘ nm‘nr daim‘ 542-197, Annexure-AJ15, is concerned, there is not ui $he was aHcwed and: p § e uner cannm‘ be aibw d to sor‘xtinue an the lizzkwr i» u"s arder. Even if ii is was: that sne was one wrong cannai make the thmg right and 15 not entétied i9 cantihue in service a5 per n Bench judgmgnt of the Agex Cami: which avvv: . dc mi fim my $Lib5iame i'r'1 ihi$ gxiefiticm werefcre, deges'ves ta be dismia$ed and ii i" Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ‘