WP(C) 6274/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UB SAHA By this writ petition, the petitioner made a prayer for a direction to the respo ndents to issue necessary road permits, delivery notes, clearance certificates, ’C’ forms, etc. When the matter is taken up as motion, Mr. B Gogoi. learned Standing Counsel, Fi nance Department submits that the authority has already issued permits and neces sary documents in favour of the petitioner, as sought for. Hence, nothing remain s to be decided by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also conceded to the said submission of the M r. Gogoi. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondent , Finance Department in the affidavit in opposition contended that they have the right to refuse the grant of permit in view of sub-rule 12A of Rule 41, Assam V alue Added Tax Rules, 2005. If a Rule provided any right to any party that cannot be taken away by the Court . Court can only see whether any authority is flouting the Rules or not. Therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner has no merit. In view of the above, nothing remains in this writ petition for decision of this Court. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.