IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 10086 of 2002 BETWEEN: Jami Ramanaiah, S/o. Thavitaiah, Tekkali and R/o. Tekkali. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Srikakulam. 2 The Joint Collector, Srikakulam. 3 The District Supply Officer, Srikakulam. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tekkali Mandal, Srikakulam District. 5 The District Manager, FCI, Srikakulam. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction order or orders declaring the order of the 1st respondent in SR.No.16/2002-S.1 dated 16.4.2002 as wholly arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, offending the principles of natural justice and void; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.P.CHANDRAMOULI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: It is stated that petitioner questions the order dated 16.04.2002 suspending the Schedule Commodity Licence and keeping him in the black list pending enquiry. Thereafter final orders have been passed in Rc.No.149/2002 S.7 dated 13.07.2002. 2. In view of the aforesaid final orders, I am of the opinion that the writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause to be adjudicated in the writ petition. However, it is open to the petitioner to question the aforesaid final order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 1, 2008 DSK