HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.16870 OF 2009 Dt.24.8.2009 Pogula Komuraiah … Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Karimnagar and three others …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.16870 OF 2009 O R D E R: The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition had taken notice on 17.8.2009 and requested time to get instructions. Thus, the matter is coming up for admission. Heard Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition had placed written instructions before this Court, wherein it was stated that the petitioner Pogula Komuraiah, S/o Venkati, R/o Peddampet, had been forwarded to the Tahsildar, Kamanpur Mandal, vide Memo No.B1/297/04 dated 20.8.2009, for taking necessary action on the contents of the petition while issuing resumption orders. Hence, the question of referring the matter under Section 30 of the L.A.Act to the Civil Court, for adjudication of dispute, does not arise. The writ petition is filed, for a writ of Mandamus declaring the in action on the part of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner’s objection petition dated 8.7.2009 in respect of H.No.6-135 situated at Peddampet village of Kamanpur Mandal, Karimnagar District as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct the enquiry and consider the claim of the petitioner and refer the matter under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act to Civil Court for adjudication of dispute and pass such other suitable orders. Several facts had been narrated in paras 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. In the light of the specific stand taken in the written instructions placed before this Court by the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of with an observation to the affect that let the 2nd respondent to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take a decision in this matter, in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. _________________ P.S.NARAYANA,J 24th August, 2009. PNV