IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2010 / 17TH POUSHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 12 of 2010() ---------------------------- S.T.NO.1518/06 OF JFCM-II, PATHANAMTHITTA CRA 239/07 OF THE SESSIONS COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------------- SHEEJA, VILAKOM ,PURAYIDOM,PALLIMUKKU MASJID JN, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.SUNIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. DAVID REJI MATHEW, S/O.C.D.MATHEW ALUMMOOTTIL HOUSE MANJANIKKARA MURI OMALLOOR VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.S.MANU FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.KAMMAPPU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No.12 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 07.01.2010 ORDER The accused in S.T.No.1518 of 2006 on the file of the J.F.C.M-II, Pathanamthitta for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 20 of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 7th day of January, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj