FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1063 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 226 OF 2002 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. V.C. Patil, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Jadhav h/f. Mr. V.R. Dhorde for respondent. CORAM: V. R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED: 26th August, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. No specific direction is required to be passed on the present application because while disposing of the Criminal Revision Application No. 226/2002 this Court clearly held that though maintenance application filed by the respondent was liable to be dismissed and was dismissed as such, yet the payment of maintenance allowance made during the intervening period and may not be recovered from her. If any other amount is deposited by the applicant, then he will be, therefore, entitled to withdraw the same from the Court. Therefore, if the respondent wife has not withdrawn the entire amount, the Magistrate may refund the rest of the amount to the petitioner as per the law. Therefore, no specific order is required. Application is disposed of. [ V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] ssc/ca1063.10