HIGH COURT ()1! CHHAT’I ISGARH AT BILA§PUR WRIT PETITION (C) No 4215 of2008 . (yorelal Upadhyay, aged about 61 yeaa‘s, Rfo 'llage Saida, District Bilaspur (C G) 2 Sham Prasad Upadhyay R/o Vlllage Smda, D1stnct Bllaspm (C G ) VERSUS Board ofRevenue Chhattisgarh, Bitaspur. Coilector, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Sub Divisional O$ce1y Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Tahasildar, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Nayab Tahasildar, Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Meena Bai W/o Late Surendra Upadhyay, Pujarin Bhagwan Shri Ramchandraji, Jankiji Lamanji, Mahadevji Temple, Village Saida, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTKCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Harkbie Shri Sa13§h K. Agizimm, J. Present: Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/reSpondent No. 1 to 5 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Nw~ ${11 With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that aiierr remand oom Board of Revenue, by order dated 16.10.2007 (Annemire P/l), no step has been taken by the Collector Bilaspur as on date Learned counsel makes a prayer that the Collector Bilaspur mav be directed to consrder the matter between the parties: expeditiouslv to which learned counsel appearmg for the State/respondents 1 to 5 has no obj ection. Wlthout expressing any opimon on merit, m the interest of justice it is desrrable that the Revrsron Case No 35/3-121/2005-2006 may be decided expeditiously. Accordingly, the Collector, Bilaspur is directed to do the r needful in accordance with law, on its own merits, expeditiously. In View ofthe above, the petition stands iiisposed of. No order asto eosts. ‘i" 1 n ORAL ORDER (Passed on 05a; day of September, 2008) 17w Sd/- l ‘ l I Satish K.Agnihotri Judge