IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 35733 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.G. NAMBOODIRI, S/O. GOVINDAN NAMBOODIRI, AGED 75 YEARS, KAINIKKAARA MANA, MANNAR MURI, KADAPRA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE LAND REFORS REVIEW BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CONVENER OF THE LAND REFORS REVIEW BOARD , SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. Addl.4 STATE OF KERALA REP. BY REVENUE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. Addl. 5. STATE LAD BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, SECRETAIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. Addl.R4 and R5 are impleaded as per order in I.A.No.16302/08 dated 18.12.2008) BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N SATHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.35733 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT In this writ Petition what is prayed for is a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider his request for substitution of the land covered by the proceedings in Ceiling Case N.217/TVLA. Petitioner submits that in the process of surrender, due to a mistake committed he has surrendered land consisting of Sarppakkavu where various rites and rituals are performed. Realizing the mistake he says that he filed an application before the 3rd respondent for substitution. It is stated that though this court has passed an order dated 18.12.2008 requiring the 3rd respondent to decide whether the land offered by the petitioner can be accepted, the same has still not been considered. 2. Taking into account the above and also the submission made by the petitioner that the application WP(c).No.35733/08 /2/ made before the 3rd respondent is still pending, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the matter as expeditiously as possible on the production of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. It is also clarified that if the petitioner so desires it will be open to him to make detailed representation in this regard to the 3rd respondent. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.35733/08 /2/