..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2868 OF 2008 Salim Khursid Ahmed Shaikh. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Amin Solkar, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. DATED : 2nd September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R. No.I-628 of 2007 of Mumbra Police Station. The said case is under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The applicant has been named in the FIR. The witnesses have stated that co-accused Sayyed stabbed the deceased with gupti and the applicant assaulted the deceased on the shoulder, knees and legs by means of chopper. Deceased Mohsin sustained 16 injuries in the incident. There is a ..(2).. recovery of blood stained chopper at the instance of the applicant. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant has only assaulted on the shoulder, knees and legs i.e. non-vital parts of the body, hence it cannot be said that the applicant had intention to commit murder and that he shared the common intention of other accused persons. As stated earlier, the deceased Mohsin sustained 16 injuries in the incident. The weapons used, the number of assailants and number of injuries clearly show that the applicant had the intention to commit murder of Mohsin. Hence, I find no merit in this submission. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)