IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2009 / 22ND SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23043 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VIJAYAKUMARI, SARASWATHY BHAWAN, PUNNAMOODU, KALLIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL SRI.NISHIL.P.S. RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KALLIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. KRISHNA PANICKER, SANTHI NIVAS, PUNNAMOODU, KALLIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.23043 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 13th August,2009 J U D G M E N T Alleging that certain trees situated in the property of the 4th respondent posed a danger to the house of the petitioner, she moved the Sub Divisional Magistrate, the 2nd respondent under Sec.133 of the Cr.P.C. Ext.P1 order was passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate on 23.6.2009 requiring the 4th respondent to trim the branches of the mango tree and tie the two coconut trees with double iron ropes. Petitioner’s complaint is that order has not been implemented so far. Petitioner may move the 2nd respondent along with a copy of this judgment requiring further steps pursuant to Ext.P1 and if it is so done, further orders shall be passed on the petitioner’s request by the 2nd respondent after notice to the 4th respondent also, within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment Writ petition is disposed of as above . (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3