H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. 519 of2006 'NON-APPLICANTS APPLICANTS : 1. Ku. Bhagwana Sahu D/o Shri Sadhram Sahu, aged about 24 yeai's, R/o village Otgan, Block Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). 2. Purshottam S/o Shri Manohar Lal aged about 27 years, Chhirchuan Sabasiyapra, R/o village Pachpedi, Post Raikona, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). 3. Paras Ram S/o Shri Ram Prasad Salhewana, Block Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). VERS'US 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat, DK Building, Raipur (CG). 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). 3. The Block Education Ofilcer, Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). 4. The SarpancK, Gram Panchayat, Jora, Block Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). 5. The Sarpanch, Graiii Panchayat Dandani, Block Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). 6. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Tolidih, Block Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). (APPLICATION FOR RESTORA'HON OF W.P. No. 2160/2001) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Asnihotri, J.) Present : Smt. Savita Tiwari, Advocate for fhe applicants. Shri Bhaskar P}^asi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondcnt No. 1. None for tiie respondent No. 2 to 6. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17ul day ofNovember, 2008) 1. Having heard leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the delay is genuine and bonafide. Thus, delay is condoned. Ssliu 2. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe applicants submits that the counsel for the petitioners could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, W.P. No. 2160/2001, which was dismissed on 02.01.2006, be restored to its file. 3. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P No. 2160/2001 be restored to the original file. 4. A copy ofthis order be placed on record ofthe original petition and the same be listed for hearing. 5. In view ofthe above, application for restoration ofthe writ petition, is allowed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge