1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.3782 OF 2009 Shaikh Anis s/o Shahamad Patel. Petitioner. V E R S U S The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad & ors. Respondents. Shri S. J. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S. D. Kaldate, AGP for state. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J : DATE : 23rd JUNE, 2009. PER COURT :- 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the learned Additional Collector, Aurangabad dated 23.03.2009 vide which the dispute filed by the present petitioner challenging the legality of the proceedings passed in special meeting dated 13.02.2009 came to be rejected. 2. Shri S. J. Salunke, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the authorities failed to take into consideration notice of the meeting in which no confidence motion was discussed were not properly served on the members. It is therefore, submitted that proceedings were initiated by non 2 compliance of statutory provision. 3. A Grampanchayat consist of 9 members. It is clear that the requisite requirement to support of two third members has been fully satisfied in so far as other grounds are concerned, there was sufficient compliance. 4. In that view of the matter no case is made out for causing interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence rejected. ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ..... aaa/wp3782.09 3