1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.119 OF 2004. FIRST APPEAL NO.119 OF 2004. FIRST APPEAL NO.119 OF 2004. Abdul Razak Gafur Shaikh : Appellant. versus Mr.Shankar Vithoba Nanware and anr. : Respondents. Mr.M.A.Utsikar for the appellant. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 21st June 2005. DATED : 21st June 2005. DATED : 21st June 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard advocate for the appellant. This appeal is for enhancement of compensation. It is a case of temporary disablement out of a fracture to the right leg - tibia ad fibula . The tribunal awarded Rs.25,000/- . There is no evidence of any permanent disablement. The appellant was indoor patient at Sassoon Hospital for three days only. Though the tribunal has 2 2 2 held that it was 16% permanent disablement, what is nature of disablement is no where explained nor proved by the appellant. Hence there is no merit in this appeal. It is dismissed. [D.G.DESHPANDE] 21/06/2005 JUDGE.