Criminal Misc.-M No. 19988 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 19988 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.9.2011 Krishna .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the complainant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were recorded: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present FIR has been registered regarding matrimonial dispute. The husband and father-in-law of the complainant were arrested and released on bail. Petitioner is the mother-in-law of the complainant”. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already joined investigation. Learned counsels for the State as well as the complainant submitted that four bangles, one Mangal Suttar and ` 11,000/- paid to the husband at the time of marriage, which were allegedly handed over by him to his mother, are yet to be recovered. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the husband and father-in-law of the complainant were arrested and have been released on bail; the petitioner has also joined Criminal Misc.-M No. 19988 of 2011 [2] investigation and merely because there is some recovery of alleged dowry articles, as stated by learned counsel for the complainant, to be made from the petitioner, in my opinion, her custodial interrogation is not required. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 7.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 28.9.2011 mk