ng^T"K "IOH COURT OF JUDICATDRB AT BILABPUR ^frit Petltton So. //^/ /2006 StnSj^ BSfli PETCTIONER s '^.i ^^>^ 35-^^- ^<^--" »?''K^>-' ^•^"^. ^,a^- Satiah Kuanar Dhirhi, S/ o Shn Laxmi Chandra, aged about 37 years, Occup&tion - Uneiaployed R/o WUags- Nariyara, P. S. Pamgarh, TahsU.- Janjgr, District- Jaujgir Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTO \ ,<-Veraus - k' '\ l. State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Revexxue Department, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.Q.). 2. •' CoUector, Dlatnct- Janjsr Champa (C.Q.). 3. ' Block Develapment OflScer, Block - Akaltara, Diatrict- Janjgu- Chaaipa (C.G.). 4. ' State of Madhya Pradesh, Throug^i Secretary, Revenue Departmeat, Mantralaya, VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). TOEUT KBTtTOH UBDER ARTICUB 33S/237 OF THB COHSTITUTIOB OF IHDIA FOR I88VAIICE OF A STOTAaUE WRIT. ORDER 00. DIRECTIOB TO DO JUSTICE VS THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 -3Sf ^nqRT^, •S^'H'IS. 1°RTRiy •-> r.h 'RTOeff «i*<|t(i 1 A.....^\-'A.^' an^i-^i. 'f?::ii?;3iiisi wiRi'ffl??r H/- + 33-3^006 „, ,, 31R(?I ?i?IBT'gfef Shri K K.Singh, ooynsel for the petlti^ner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. A.G. & ShifSatish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for is alloWed oompassionate apFJointment w.p. tfie State of Chhat|^garh. Applicationfbryrgent hearing isallow Heard. Learried eounsei for the petltioner ^as working as Accountant, died during sep^ the petitioner applied for ^ubmitted that in batch of cases bearing c|uestion orders hava been pgssed by this jimjlar orders may be passed In thls caseal^ i-earnea' counsel for the State doesl t^iat theState of Chhattisgarh has takenj cjependants of those. empfayees w'no dii ^ccordanoe with the poiicy prevaient at that in view of the submissions made ftarties, without expressing any opinipn on t t[iis Court, ends of justice will be served (phhattisgarh and the authorities concemed l^eiitionsr in-accordance with the policy ^ther. If the petitioner found etigible, appoii f^ossibie preferably within a period of four m(] 4f copy of tnis order. The petitioner is aiso d^ ^uthorities. With the aforesaicl observations, this Certifled copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel. .•*i^f^'iil'l •WRTf^^S 'VS^K ^K 3lP?TT 311^1 spbmits that the petitioners father, who }jce period on 17/1^1997 andthereafter which was denied. It is further '. No-1322/2002 involving the same Court on 20-12-2005. He prays that io.! ' ! ' ' |not dispute the abpve fact and states a decisiort to consider the cases of ^d on 6r after 1-11-1997 strictiy in Ime. , |iy learned counsel appearing for the merits ofthe case, in the opinion of p a diFection is given to the State of Ito consider and decide the case of the •v^ient at the time of deatti of petitiorier's ient orders wili be issued as early as ^ntfts from the date of reoeipt/production ^eeted to render due co-operation to the prev^ien' rttmi petition standsdisposed of. ^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [-[il^^fe4 ?^