IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2574 OF 2010 Between : Kalagadda Lazarus .... PETITIONER A N D Aduri Hari Narayana and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2574 OF 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order, dated 18.02.2010, in I.A.No.111 of 2010 in O.S.No.18 of 2010, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, whereunder and whereby, it was directed to issue urgent notice to the petitioner, respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein directing petitioner herein /respondent No.1 to furnish third party security for the suit amount within 48 hours on receipt of notice, failing which, the amount of the petitioner lying with respondent Nos.2 and 3 will be attached as per Section 60 CPC. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner contended that the impugned order is contrary to Section 60(g) CPC, which prohibits the attachment of retirement benefits of the petitioner and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 3. Section 60 CPC declares what properties are liable to attachment and sale in execution of a decree, and that properties are exempt there from. It seeks to protect a judgment debtor by granting exemption of certain properties from attachment and sale. In the first instance petitioner was directed to furnish security to the decreetal amount, and if the petitioner fails to furnish the third party security, the amount of the petitioner lying with respondents 2 and 3 would be attached in terms of Section 60 CPC. If the amount is not liable for attachment in terms of Clause (g) of Section 60 CPC, petitioner can as well file a petition to raise the attachment as it amount to contravention of Clause (g) of Section 60 CPC. Therefore, the impugned order is in accordance with law and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the trial Court for raising attachment on the ground it contravenes Section 60 (g) CPC. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J MARCH 22, 2011 YVL