IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17719 of 2011 SANJAY RAI, Son of Sri Ram Ashish Rai, Resident of Mohalla- Sahadra Ramdhani Road, Patna City, P.S. – Malsalami, District – Patna. . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 15.06.2011 Heard Sri Ganga Prasad Bimal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ram Sumiran Rai, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Malsalami P.S. Case No. 180 of 2010, registered for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 272, 273, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act since 26.02.2011 has prayed for grant of bail. Accusation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was manufacturing illegal wine in huge quantity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case hardly offence under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act is applicable and the petitioner has already remained in jail for sufficient period. Sri Ram Sumiran Rai has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and it was submitted that material has come that the petitioner himself was manufacturing illegal wine. In view of the facts and circumstances and nature of accusation, let the petitioner namely, Sanjay 2 Rai be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Patna City in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 180 of 2010, on a condition, that if at subsequent stage the petitioner is made accused for the similar offence, the petitioner's bail bond in the present case shall stand automatically cancelled. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)