((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.49 OF 2009 Tapan Rushikesh Sikdar Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent None for the applicant. Y.S.Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 30th January 2009 PC : 1. None for the applicant. The application was kept back on two occasions as the advocate for the applicant was absent. By order dated 31st March 2008 the applicant was convicted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 35th Court, CST, Mumbai for the offence punishable under section 144 of the Railways Act. Being aggrieved by the said order, the applicant preferred a revision application before the Sessions Court. The revision application has been dismissed. In the circumstances, the present appeal is not maintainable under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not ((-2-)) maintainable. This order will not preclude the applicant from initiating appropriate proceedings in accordance with law for challenging the impugned order. 2. In view of dismissal of this application, Criminal Application Nos.71 of 2009 and 72 of 2009 do not survive and the same are disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)