IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23883 of 2011 Surendra Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 11.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, petitioner is husband of the deceased. It is also admitted position that the deceased died between 27/28.8.2010 whereas complaint case was filed on 14.9.2010 which was converted into Baikunthpur P.S. Case no.133/2010. It would appear from perusal of the case diary that allegedly, petitioner went at parental house of the deceased and slept with the deceased prior to her death and subsequently, he raised alarm that the deceased had gone to natural call but she did not return. It is also an admitted position that the dead body of the deceased was found in a canal and the dead body was taken to the village of the petitioner where dead body was cremated but the informant did not lodge any case against the petitioner just after the alleged occurrence. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, particularly, this aspect of the matter that case has been registered under sections 302, 201 of the IPC and admittedly, none has seen the actual killing of the deceased, let the petitioner, Surendra Rai, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Gopalganj in Baikunthpur P.S. Case no. 133/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)