IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9060 of 2008 Between: Gasikanti Anasuya W/o. Late G.Mankaiah R/o. H.No. 6-2-104, Karkanagadda, Karimnagar Distrcit. ..... PETITIONER AND The Municipal Corporation of Karimnagar, Karimnagar, Rep. by its Commissioner. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the application of the petitioner dated 29-10-2007 seeking permission for construction of Compound wall around land admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 1.18 gts. in plot No. 1 to 6 in Sy.No. 92 situated at Kisan Nagar, Karimnagar Town as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VENKATESHWAR VARANASI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.J.KANAKAIAH The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 9060 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been filed by Gasikanti Anasuya assailing inaction of the respondent-Corporation in considering her application dated 29-10-2007. 2. The petitioner is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.1-18 guntas in Survey No. 92 in plot Nos. 1 and 6, Kisan Nagar, Karimnagar Town. She made an application to Tahsildar to mutate her name in concerned revenue records. The Tahsildar issued proceedings No.B/104/07, dated 15-10-2007 and recorded her name as owner in the revenue records. She made a representation to the Respondent-Corporation seeking permission to construct a compound wall around her land. Her application remained unattended. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation.q 4. Since the application filed by the petitioner seeking permission to consider the compound wall around her land is stated to be pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent-Corporation to consider the application of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and Rules framed there under and pass appropriate orders. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 1st July, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 9060 OF 2008 1st July, 2008.