1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16584 of 2011 1 ANTHONY 2 SUDALAI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAKOVILANKULAM, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.217 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 379(NP) and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 4 of Woman Harassment Act, in Crime No.217 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.V.Perumal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners caused injuries to the defacto complainant and also abused the defacto complainant with the filthy language. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides and also considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, subject to the following stringent conditions:- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 (i) Each of the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,250/- (Rupees One Thousand Two hundred and Fifty only) to the credit of Crime No.217 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil; (ii) On such deposit the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil; (iii) The petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; and (iv) The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAKOVILANKULAM, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. V.PERUMAL Advocate SR. No.44355 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16584 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 RJ/22.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/