IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 30511 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.RADHAKRISHNAN,S/O.GOPALAN NAIR, MADAATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAMARAYOOR VIA, KOTTAPPADY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 505. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURE DIRECTORATE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR , STATE BIO CONTROL LAB, MANNUTHY,THRISSUR. 3. THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER, THRISSUR,PIN 680 020. 4. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, THRISSUR GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 30511 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 4th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that although a charge memo has been issued to him in 2006, disciplinary proceedings pursuant to the same have not yet been completed even now. In view of the said allegation in the writ petition, I directed the learned Government Pleader to get instructions as to why the disciplinary action against the petitioner is not being completed even after three years. The learned Government Pleader today submits that disciplinary proceedings would be completed within two months. This is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to see that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P3 memo of charges are completed within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge