IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 31006 of 2010 Date of decision:8.12.2010 Balraj Singh Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. DS Brar, Advocate. Mr. KS Pannu, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner has already joined the investigation. Though the allegations against the petitioner are serious of having interrupted the employee of the Punjab State Electricity Board and having prevented him from performing his official duties but since the recoveries have already been made, it does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation. The petition is allowed and interim order dated 15.10.2010 is hereby confirmed subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C. December 8 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE