IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUJ3ICATURE AT BILASpURX:G. 'W LV^&^ l^-XLXi-i^ l\2. ^.,', ^, ^v^<w pi-fcte.*, &fcG-e-NO. OF 2011 (ARISING OUT OF W. P. (Art. 227) N0. 145 OF 2011) AN APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OP WRIT PETITION (ART. 227) <-^" N0. 145 OF 2011 - "SUNDARIBAI VS. RAVI SHRIWAS & OTHERS", DECIDED ON 23/08/2011 APPLICANT 7~ ...Ravi Shriwas, Aged 26 years, S/o Shri C.L. Shriwas, R/o Jabdapara, Bilaspur, Tahsil 8s District Bilaspur (CG.) VERSUS NON APPLICANTS /vl ^• [ ^\ ^s^<^ ^••"""^^ / >• Sundaribai, aged 80 years, . Husband Late Esarmal, . - R/o Chakarbhata, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (CG.) -PLAINTIFF) Shyam Bai alias Baula, W/o Late Shri Jhanik, R/o Village Bodri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (CG). Santu Satnami, S/o Shri Parsurara Satnami, R/o Nayapara Bodri, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (CG.) Chinmay Builders Pvt. Ltd. 819, Pushpak Apartment, Chhotapara Raipur through Managing Director Shri Prakash Dawada, S/o Shri Magan Lal Dawada, R/o Gitanjali Nagar, Raipur, Tahsl & District Raipur (CG.) Review Petition Wo. 112 OF 2011 NON-APPLICANTS 1. Ravi Shriwas, aged 26 years, S/o Shri C.L. Shriwas, R/o Jabdapara, Bilaspur Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) Sundaribai aged 80 years, Husband Late Esarm.al R/o Chakarbhata, TahsU Bitha District Bilaspiir C.G. (-—PLAINTIFFl Shyaau Bai alias Baula W/o late Shri Jhanik R/o Vitlage Bodri Tahsil BiBia District BUaspur C.G. Saatu Sataami S/o Shri Parsurani Sataami R/o Nayapara Bodri, Tahsil Bitha, District Bilaspur C.G. Chimnay Buflders Pvt. Ltd. 819, Pusbpak Apartment, Chhotapara Raipur through Maaaging Director Shri Prakash Dawada, S/o Shri Magau Lal Dawada, R/o GitanjaU Nagar, Raipur Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G). AN APPLICATION FOR RBHEARmG^P WMT PBTTJON (ART, 2271 NQ, 145 OF 2011-"SUNDARIBAI VS. R&VI SHRIWAS & OTHERS" DECIDED ON 23/08/a011. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Sanjay Shyam Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Resjjondents not noticed. 2. 3. 4. (Passedoa 14/11/2011) By fhis review petition petitioner has challenged the order dated 23/8/2011 passed inW.P. (Art. 227) No. 145/2011. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioaer subinits that petitioner is not haviag any ground of review of order but siinply prays for fi-esh date for appearaace befoic <8ie CoiiLmissioner Bilaspur. 3. Petitioner shall niade his appearance before fhe Coiumissioner, Bilaspur in Appeal Case No. 549/A-6/2008-09 as early as possible preferatoly within 20 days fi-oin today, with these observation review petition is disuussed summarUy. No order as to costs. _._— "'^ ^~^-- Sd/- :.p. Shar«na *"r:iud9® ^-