In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... (1) F.A.O. No.4921 of 2009 ..... Date of decision:28.7.2011 Manjit Kaur .....Appellant v. Gurmail Kaur and others .....Respondents .... F.A.O. No.4925 of 2009 ..... Amrik Singh .....Appellant v. Kewal Singh and others .....Respondents .... CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL ..... 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ...... Present: Mr. D.S. Gurna, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. P.K. Gupta and Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. ..... Mohinder Pal, J. F.A.O. No.4921 of 2009 & F.A.O. No.4925 of 2009 [2] Since the orders passed by the Election Tribunal has been set aside in the connected appeals, the respondent No.1 in both the appeals (appellants in the connected appeals) are found to be the elected candidates so there is no reason to pass specific order for declaring the election of the respondents. For the reasons mentioned in the connected appeals, the appeals filed by the appellants are also bound to fail and the same are dismissed. July 28, 2011. (Mohinder Pal) Judge *hsp*