IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2009 / 12TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17727 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.SOMERVEL MEMORIAL CSI MEDICAL COLLEGE KARAKONAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ADV. V.SAJAN PRASAD, S/O. VARGHESE, AGED 44, RESIDING AT ELDAD, CHITTAZHA, VATTAPPARA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, RAM MOHAN PALACE, (OLD HIGH COURT BUILDING, HALL NO.VIII), ERNAKULAM. 2. A.UNNIKRISHNAN, SAISREE, MANGARATHU VILA, KURUMI, NEMOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.N.SUGATHAN FOR R2 SMT.VARSHA BHASKAR FOR R2 SRI.S.PRASANTH (AYYAPPANKAVU) FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2009, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 17520 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX Petitioners Exhibits: Ext.P1: True copy of Consensual Agreement dated 17.06.2008 Ext.P2: True copy of order dated 12.8.2008 by which Fee Regulatory Committee fixed fees. Ext.P3: True copy of Notification dated.14.8.2008 Ext.P4: True copy of the interim order dated 23.7.2008 in WP(C) No.21155 of 2008. Ext.P5: True copy of the order dated 22.8.2008 by the Supreme Court Ext.P6: True copy of Undertaking dated 3.9.2008 executed by the petitioner.. Ext.P7(a): True copy of notice by the petitioner. Ext.P7(b): True copy of notice by the petitioner. Ext.P7(c): True copy of notice by the petitioner. Ext.P8: True copy of the complaint dated 22.6.2009 Ext.P9: True copy of notice dated 22.6.2009 by Admission Supervisory Committee. Ext.P10:True copy of details of balance due from those 31 students. /True copy/ P.A. To Judge V.GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No.17727 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for first respondent submits that the Admission Supervisory Committee had closed the complaint filed by the students. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) jma