IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19488 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 06, 2010. Baldev Raj .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.Soi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is stated to have been running his business of Mobile Aatta Chakki which he operates on his tractor. It is alleged that the S.H.O., Police Station Nakodar, District Jalandhar is interfering in the aforesaid business of the petitioner at the instance of the District Transport Officer, Jalandhar. The petitioner accordingly seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent-authorities to allow him to run his business. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am of the considered view that the petitioner, if so advised, may apply for the grant of necessary permission to run the Mobile Aatta Chakki. If any such application is moved by the petitioner and if it is so permissible under the Act/Rules, the authorities concerned shall consider C.W.P.No .19488 of 2010 2 and dispose of the petitioner's claim by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receiving such an application. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE