iE;A3?t2j ccniyi c^. BEFORE HON'BLE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ~o5~ WRIT PETITION^) NO....2;3.!3..... OF 2011 PETITIONER ^ q// /^•- ^, f\>/ f}V / ^o.^.€^>'" &•'. '5;'.^--'' 's..''^".* ^-'/L>" 5>/.^'^:' .^0'.?° A' .*' <-~^' lirza (Adv.) tor Genersl of India iift High Court Bilaspur '/ RESPONDENTS: 1 2. 3. 4. ^l'.l^. M/s Rajatlspat Private Limited Through - Director - Shri Subhash Agrawal aged about 42 years, Son of Shri Gulab Chand Agrawal Resident ofC/o Hotel Pushpak, Opp. Main Hospital,Raigarh - O.P.Jindal Industrial Park, Punjipatra, Raigarh Police Station House Punjipatra, Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Union oflndiathrough Secretary Ministry ofFinance (Department of Revenue) Central Board ofExcise and Customs 128-B, North BlockNew Delhi-1 Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise and customs, Division Bilaspur^ Rishi Bhawan, Near Apex Bank, Near Nehm Chowk, Bilaspui^olice Station House Civil Lines, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G) Commissioner, Central Excise and customs, (Appeals-I) C.Ex.Building, Tikrapara, Dhamtari Road, Raipur Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G) Superintendent, Customs and Central Excise Plot Number - 5 - Chaitanya Nagar, Jagatpur Road, Range- Raigarh (C.G.) -y ^.i. g WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226.227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -J_ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRITPETITIQN (T1N0.2313 OF 2011 PETITIONER M/s Rajat Ispat Private Limited RESPONDENTS Versus Union of India & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226, 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ashok Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Bhishma Kinger, Advocate forthe respondent No.1. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 2nd day of May, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to statutory forum, that may be available to him, under the provisions of law, 'f so advised. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Consequently, the writ petitibn is dismissed, as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. ^ Arun Satish K. Agnihotri Judge