IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7460 of 2010 1. AKALU SAH, SON OF LATE BHAJJU SAH 2. SMT. ANJALI DEVI, WIFE OF AKALU SAH 3. DEEPAK SAH @ DEEPAK KUMAR SAH, SON OF AKALU SAH 4. RAJ KUMAR SAH, SON OF LATE MANIK SAH 5. ARJUN SAH, SON OF LATE MANIK SAH 6. KARITIK SAH @ KARTIK KUMAR SAH, SON OF ARJUN SAH ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – AZAMNAGAR, P.S. AZAMNAGAR, DISTT. KATIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KESHAV ROY, SON OF LATE GUNADHAR ROY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AZAMNAGAR, P.S. AZAMNAGAR, DISTT. KATIHAR. ----------- 2. 29.11.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order darted 20.8.2009 passed in Criminal Revision No. 21 of 2009 by which Sessions Judge, Katihar, in Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 78 of 2008 by which he has taken cognizance under Sections 448, 380, 504, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of S.C/S.T. Prevention of Atrocities Act. The contention of the petitioner is that the occurrence took place on account of a title suit pending between them and in fact, no such occurrence had taken place, I am unable to appreciate the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner since it concerns the factual aspects of the case which cannot be looked into at the stage of 482 Cr. P.C. The application is, thus, dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)