IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35843 of 2010 1. GHANSHYAM TIWARI 2. Bisho Paswan Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are alleged for kidnapping of informant’s daughter, is corroborated by the victim herself in her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C., which according to the petitioners is favouring him as that is to the effect that petitioners along with Ravish Paswan took her to train got her boarded on the train for Delhi, remained for several days with Ravish Paswan but from the very beginning till her escape from Delhi, there is nothing on her behalf, if any résistance or opposition was made. She was allowed to live with labourers. Specifically, it is submitted that it was her love with Ravish Paswan. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Suryagarha (Piribazar) P.S. Case No. 184 of 2007 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)