IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2010 / 8TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 19719 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSE K.O, LOWER DIVISION CLERK(UNDER SUSPENSION) NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE FINANCE STANDING COMMITTEE, NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 5. NATTAKAM SURESH, PRESIDENT, NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTYAM. 6. SECRETARY, NATTAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R3 & R6 SRI.C.S.SUNIL FOR R5 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH- R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.19719/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: True copy of the Memo dated 3.7.09. P2: True copy of the reply sent by the petitioner dated 6.7.2009. P3: True copy of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 6.7.2009. P4: True copy of the minutes of the finance Standing Committee dated 26.3.2007. P5: True copy of the minutes of the 4th respondent dated 30.6.2007. P6: True copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent dated 12.8.2009. P7: True copy of the representation sent by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent on 10.5.2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: Nil C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.19719 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated 30th July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is presently working as Lower Division Clerk in Nattakam Grama Panchayat. In fact, this writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P3 order whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension. When this matter was taken up today, the Learned Government Pleader submitted that pending this writ petition the petitioner was reinstated in service. The said statement was endorsed by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well. In the said circumstances, taking into account the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is closed. The learned counsel for the petitioner however submitted that the petitioner has got certain grievances with respect to the posting given pursuant to the order of reinstatement. In case the petitioner has got any such grievance against the posting order, it will be open to him to approach the appropriate authorities. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS