AB 1711/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. P. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. He has also made availabl e the case diary for perusal of the Court. Mr. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Staff Reporter of Dainik Janasadharan . The petitioner’s first wife expir ed in the year 2009 leaving behind his son, who is presently studying in Class-I X. The petitioner had solemnized marriage for the second time with the informant , who has lodged the present Ejahar against him. According to Mr. Bora, the Ejah ar does not reflect the correct state of affairs and the differences between the spouses had cropped up over the petitioner’s child through the first marriage. He also submits that the petitioner will try his level best to sort out the diff erences with the informant. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on overall consideration o f the facts and circumstances of the case including the materials available in t he case dairy, I am of the considered opinion that the interim bail granted on 1 7.6.2011 be made absolute. In the aforesaid view of the matter, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, namely, Sri Saroj Gohain, in connection with Tinsukia Police Station Case No. 322/2011, registered under Section 498(A), IPC read with Sectio n 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, he shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/-(R upees ten thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of th e arresting authority. It is further directed that the petitioner shall report t o the Investigating Officer on or before 1.7.2011 and shall continue to report t o the Investigating Officer every fortnight for a period of two months from toda y. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the bail application is di sposed of.