1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2891 OF 2009 Pandurang S/o Rambhau Shelar Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. Y. V. Kakade, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D. R. Korde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 10th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant and learned A.P.P. The accused/ applicant, acted as an attesting witness to the fake sale deed executed. The counsel informs and supported by Exhibit-B that on 31st July, 2007 his father had been to the same registration office for purchase of the property and it was the accused/ applicant who accompanied his father. The sale deed of his father shows presence of the accused/ applicant at the material time. It was in this situation, the accused/ applicant acted as attesting witness to the document which is under clouds, subject of Crime No.I-28 of 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 2009. The main accused who have played role in the matter are in custody. 2. Custodial interrogation of the accused/ applicant not desired. He is a permanent resident of the area. Hence, order. 3. In the event of arrest of the accused/ applicant, he be released on his furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- [Rupees fifteen thousand only], till charge sheet. 4. The accused/ applicant to attend the investigator on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. to 05.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. 5. The accused/ applicant will not influence the witnesses. 6. Application allowed in above terms. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:10/09/2009. ans/2891