a; m%m?. mJgb.wm Q” §E¢i<p wm»m mm . V Q ‘ “fam mym3 mm“ (Nmwmmw (Wm gay. mym€ms mxguk! a HIGH . COURT OF ' ‘ 'CHHATTISGARH —‘—\\ : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S! No.2234l2005 PETITIONER Shobha Kamle (Shendey) Versus State of M.P. {now CG.) and others \ RESPONDENTS Writ Petition [SI No.2235l2005 PETITIONER Mohd. Israil Versus State of MP. (now CG.) and others RESPONDENTS And - Writ Petitian (S! No.2236l2005 PETITIONER X Ubresh Kumar Versus State of M.P. (n‘ow CG.) and others 3 RESPONDENTS Aggearance: Shri R.K. Pali, counsel far the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt.’Advec‘§te for the State. iii J: Praveen Petitioners in these three petitions have filed petitions aggrieved by common order by which their salary was stopped. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequently on account of issuance of order of termination from serVice the petitioners have filed three separate petitions challenging their respective orders of Iermmatlon and those pet1t1ons were allowed by this Court, also deciding the issue with regard to grant of back wages. In View of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner nothing surv1ves for conSideration in these petitions Petitions are accordingly finally disposed of placmg on record the aforesaid submiSSion made by learned counsel for the petitioner. W ORAL— ORDER (Passed on 30.03.2010) / 1‘ l Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava V Judge / W _r'_,/ l