1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4506 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.357 OF 2009 Vishwas Wamanrao patil Age-51 years, Occu-Agriculturist, R/o.Morgaon (Kd.) Tq. Raver, Dist. Jalgaon APPLICANT VERSUS Suhasini Dattatraya Wani, Age-48 years, Occu-Business, R/o.Raver Main Road, Raver, Tq.Raver, Dist. Jalgaon RESPONDENT Mr.A.H.Kasliwal, h/f. Mrs.Netrali Jain, learned counsel for applicant. Mr.K.C.Sant, learned counsel for respondent State. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 04/01/2010 PER COURT : 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Criminal Appeal No.48/2003, which appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Court confirming the order of conviction passed by the J.M.F.C. Raver in SCC No. 1201/2002 and convicted the applicant accused for an offence punishable u/s. 138 of The N.I.Act and sentenced to suffer SI for 6 2 months and to pay the compensation in the sum of Rs.1,18,000/- to the original complainant. It is informed that during the pendancy before the Trial Court as well as during the pendancy of First Appeal before the Appellate Court, the revision applicant was on bail and was taken in custody on 15/12/2009 when the First Appeal No. 48/2003 came to be decided. As the applicant accused had enjoyed the liberty of bail during the pendancy of case before the Trial Court as well as before the First Appellate Court, he be released on bail on same terms and conditions on which he was released by the Trial Court subject to he shall deposit Rs.50,000/- in the Trial Court forthwith. The order of release on bail to be issued only on depositing this amount. If the said amount is deposited, the revision opponent is at liberty to withdraw this amount un-conditionally. Hence this application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JAN 2010/cri.appl.4506-09