IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8907 of 1993 1. SMT. RENU KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF SHRI CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAJHOULIA ESTATE, P.S. BATHNAHA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 2. SMT. SHARDA SINGH, WIFE OF SHRI BISHNU KUL PRAKASH SHARMA AND DAUGHTER OF SHRI LALLAN PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RIGGA, P.S. RIGGA, DISTRICT-SITAMARHI 3. SMT. RANI KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAJHOULIA ESTATE, P.S. BATHNAHA, DISTT. SITAMARHI 4. KRISHNA CHANDRA PRASAD SINGH, SON OF SHRI RAM KISHORE SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KOTA TAJPUR, P.S. RUNISAIDPUR, DISTT. SITAMARHI 5. NAGENDRA PATHAK, SON OF SHRI KAPILDEO PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAJHOULIA ESTATE, P.S. BATHNAHA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. 6. AWADHESH AZAD, SON OF SHRI LAKSHMAN PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAJHOULIA ESTATE, P.S. BATHNAHA,DISTT. SITAMARHI……………. PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER- CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION,BUDH MARG,PATNA-1 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,SITAMARHI…………… RESPONDENTS. ------------------------------ 7 29-3-2010 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the State has submitted that although the writ petition is directed only against the decision of the State Level Screening Committee taken on 11-9-1992, the said decision of the Committee was considered by the State 2 Government along with conditions mentioned in letter no. 142 dated 4-2-89 and the State Government has also rejected the proposal for take over of Project Nina Sinha Girls High School in the District of Sitamarhi. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the State that the school in question did not have permission for establishment and as appears from the decision of the Screening Committee, it was a necessary condition for take over of a project school. Since nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) ( Gopal Prasad, J) Naresh