SCA/2117/1989 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2117 of 1989 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 273 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= GUJARAT STATE VOLUNTARY BODIESEMPLOYEES FAMILY WELFARE ASSO & 2 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR PC MASTER for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2,2.2.1 - 3. MS MANISHA LAVKUMAR AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, 3, NONE for Respondent(s) : 2, MR SHIRISH JOSHI for Respondent(s) : 4, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG Date : 10/07/2007 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Heard Mr.P.C.Master, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms.Manisha Lavkumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. None for respondent No.2. Mr.Shirish Joshi, learned counsel for SCA/2117/1989 2/2 JUDGMENT respondent No.4. 2. Mr.Master, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be allowed to withdraw the writ application with a liberty to approach appropriate Labour Court for redressal of the grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty in favour of the petitioners to approach appropriate forum for redressal of their grievances. 5. It is, however, observed that the question of limitation would not come in the way of the petitioners in view of the pendency of this writ application for almost about 18 years in this Court. 6. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, is vacated. No costs. 7. As a sequel to withdrawal of the writ application, no orders on Civil Application No.273 of 1992 are required. The same is disposed of accordingly. (R.S. GARG, J.) rafik