1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2004 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2004 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 451 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 451 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 451 OF 2003 Kisanveer Satara Sahakari .... Appellant Sakhar Karkhana Vs. Mr. Ravindra Khanderao Dere .... Respondent Mr. Piyush Shah for the Appellant. Mr. Vijay Warunjikar for Respondent. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL, AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL, AND A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. 1) We do not find any merits in the Letters Patent Appeal. Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that interim relief was not granted and the Respondent has not been taken back in service. It is therefore submitted that atleast the Writ Petition which has been admitted by the learned Single Judge be expedited. We are, therefore disposing of this L.P.A. with liberty to the learned Counsel for the Appellant- Petitioner to move the learned Single Judge for expeditious disposal of the Writ Petition. 2 2) Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) ( J.N. PATEL, J.) ( J.N. PATEL, J.) ( J.N. PATEL, J.)