..<-i:i!K"?s%fe> ^' ^'. 1 t-.. ,.• ',w ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BiLASPUR \^ ^ INIINIUIIINB PETITIONER/ APPLSCANT RESPONDENT W.P.(QNo. 2263 ot2010 Sukhdev Singh S/o Inder Singh Age- 31 Yrs., Shahid SmaraR, Opposite Rajbhavan, Raipur Versus Regional Transport Authority, Raipur. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ot Indial Ap0eararice: Mr. Raja Sharma. Counsel fo? the petitioner. SVSrs. Smita Ghai, Panel La'wyer forthe respondent. ORALORDER $0€.05.2010) SUN8L KUIViAR SINHA. J. Heard finaity with the consent ofthe parties. Petitioner- Sukhdev Singh has filed this petltion for issuance of necessary direction to the RegionaJ Transport Authority, Ralpur to consider and decide.his applicatiQn dated 15.09.09 for grant of permit on ?z.<y*U£" h^ Raipur to Bilaspur/in accordance with the provislons of the IVIotor Vehicles Act. According to the petitioner, the appiication for grant of permlt has been fiied and no decision has been taken till date. Mrs. Smita Ghai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that if the application has been fiied by the petitioner for grant ot' permit and the same has not been disposed of tlli date, the Regiona! Transport Authority shall dispose of the same at the eariiest in accordance with law. In view of the above submisslons made by learned Panei Lawyer for the respondent, this petition is disposed of wrth a direction that if the concemed Regional Transport Authority has not decided the appllcatjon dated 15.09.09 filed by the petitJoner for grant'of permit for the above route till date; the same shail be dlsposed of in accordance with law, as ^^^ m.^ 5t 'h,.,..^" /' '^"..^ W.P.(C)No. 2263 of 2010 €) route till date, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as eariy as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the said authority. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge ^