Cr.MP(M) No. 1025 of 2010 21.09.2010 Present: Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. The petitioner challenges the legality of rejection of application for his release on bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur. The primary ground taken for rejection by the Court below is that the age of prosecutrix seems to be about 15 years and the investigation is in progress. 2. It is undisputed before me that the petitioner was arrested on 22nd March, 2010 and he is now in judicial custody. Challan has been filed on 18th June, 2010. The case is now listed for 22nd October, 2010 for consideration on charge. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the continued detention of the petitioner is a serious encroachment on his liberty. The application is opposed by the learned Additional Advocate General on the ground that minor has been kidnapped and then subjected to forcible sexual intercourse and that the petitioner is guilty for the offence, which cannot be condoned in any circumstance. 4. I have perused the record of the case. At this stage, I do not find anything on record, which would infact suggest that the petitioner, if set at liberty, would interfere with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever or that grant of bail at this stage is against the interest of society or the petitioner would tamper the smooth progress of the trial. 5. Primafacie, in these circumstances, this petition is allowed subject to the following conditions: (a) That the petitioner shall furnish a personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur. (b) The petitioner shall attend the Court on each and every date of hearing unless so exempted by the trial Court in accordance with law; (c) That the petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or in any manner try to overawe or influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses; (d) The petitioner shall not obstruct the smooth progress of the trial; (e) The petitioner will not abscond from the jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur; (f) That the petitioner shall regularly report to the Police Station, Ani on every alternate day except on the dates when the trial is in progress; (g) It is clarified that in case of violation of any of the conditions imposed, he shall be arrested forthwith without reference to this Court. Petition stands disposed of. September 21, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge