IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2010 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 909 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.30887/2006 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC -------------------------------- P.SASIDHARAN,S/O.PONNU NADAR,AGED 60 YEARS, MECHANIC GRADE-II(RETD.),KSRTC, KATTAKKADA AND RESIDING AT MUNDANCHIRA MUKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, ANAMON, KANDALA PO, VIA OORUTTAMBALAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.C.O.JOSE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NO.I IN WPC ------------------------------------- SHRI.T.P.SENKUMAR, IPS, S/O.PRABHAKARAN,AGED 52 YEARS, CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR,KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR,SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. case (C).No.909 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT In view of the compliance report and the contents of Annexure 1 produced along with that, I do not find any ground to hold that there is any contempt of court committed by the respondent. The contents of the order dated 13.7.2010 does not disclose any contempt. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the views of the respondent made therein, it is a mater for which remedies are available elsewhere. No case of contempt is made out. The case is hence closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.29/10.