IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15807 of 2010 CHUNNI LAL SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 21.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Grievance of the petitioner is that on his superannuation on 31.1.2007 as Assistant Teacher from Primary School Koiel, Bhupat, Kaler, Anchal Kaler, District Arwal, the pension is not being fixed accordingly as the increment of which the petitioner was entitled was not taken into consideration while fixing his pension as done in the case of similarly situated other employee, namely, Kishore Singh in whose favour the order has been issued vide Annexure-3. The State counsel submits that the grievance of the petitioner would be verified from the record. In the above circumstances although the petitioner has already represented his grievance as contained in Annexure-4. However, he proposes to give fresh representation before respondent no.4 with a copy to respondent no.5. In case such representation is filed within four 2 weeks stating details along with a certified copy of this order the same would be considered preferably within a period of six moths from the date of his representation. If the representation of the petitioner is not accepted the same may be communicated to the petitioner with a reasoned order thereafter. The writ application stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Anilkr.sinha (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)