1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. First Appeal No. 259/2005 ( Navalkishor Shankarlalji Chandak VERSUS Purushottam Shankarlalji Chandak & others) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Mundra, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Udeshi, Advocate for the R-1 to 3. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 26 th July, 2007. It appears from the valuation in this appeal that the first appeal lies before the District Judge, Wardha. In view of the aforesaid position, the memorandum of first appeal is returned to the appellant for presenting it before the District Judge, Wardha. The counsel for the appellant submits that though there was no delay in filing this first appeal before this Court, there may be some delay in filing the first appeal before the District Judge, Wardha. The counsel for the appellant, therefore, submits that the memorandum of appeal would be filed before the District Judge, Wardha along 2 with the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal in case it appears that there is delay in filing the same. The parties undertake to remain present before the District Judge, Wardha on 16.08.2007. It is needless to say that the appellant would file the appeal in the Court of the District Judge, Wardha prior to 16.08.2007. It would also be necessary in the interest of justice to continue the interim order dated 27.04.2007 till 16.08.2007. Interim order is continued till 16.08.2007. JUDGE APTE