1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2186 OF 2007 Rashmikant Shah ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Opponents None for applicant Mr.P.S.Hingorani, A.P.P, for the State Mr.K.V.Reddy with Mr.Babasaheb Ghorpade, Advocate, for opponent No.3 CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. . None for applicant. Heard the learned counsel for opponent No.3. Perused application moved for cancellation of bail. The opponent No.3 from the record was arrested on 5th April, 2007 and pursuant to his application in Bail Application No.566 of 2007, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay directed the opponent No.3 to be released on bail and accordingly, he was released on bail. In the application no such circumstances are 2 projected by the original complainant to seek cancellation of the bail. There is absolutely no misuse or violation of terms of bail atleast not figured in the application. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the opponent No.3 that in one of the matters C.I.D enquiry was conducted and “C” summary proceedings are initiated filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, thereby declaring the prosecution to be false and frivolous. He informs top police officials, are suspended. Considering the facts no case is made out to entertain the said application. Hence, it is rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)