c."..^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH CONTEMPTCASE (C) N0 3 3^~ of2009 PETITIONER €^^^' '^r.--^" RESPONDENT CONTEMNER (^ J.P.^Sahu, S/o Moti Lal Sahu, aged about 50 years, Revenue Inspector (Bhu-Abhilekh), R/o Village-Pamgarh, District-Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS S. C. Banjare, the Additional Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION U/A215 OF THE iCONSTITUTION OF INDIAREADWITH SECTION 12 QF TWECONTEMPTS O^CgURTSACT 3^T^T t ^ l^wa^l $ti^i<^ 'yi^a ^- Praveen ^%r -i||<41d<Lt, ^•dl^^ld', fc<^l^<l< _...^A.Ctt<..(E^S?^/^ WRCrlT9hN|Cb I^^T' 'STT^T'^<TTW^ftH SB : Hon'ble Shri Manlndra Shri Alok Bakshi, coun^ cbl1Lli<ri4lrl WR^ff ^ 'fe^t ^T^R '^'3:ri:^Fr3:n^T IMohan Shrivastava, J. 28.02.2011 Shri Goutam Khetrap^l and Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. fd for the respondent Leamed counsel for th^ parties jointly submit fhat during the pendenqy of the petition, |the petitioner was allowed to join in the Revenue Circle at Janj^i|- and a doeuinent to that effect has |de order dated 1.1.2010 (Annexure respondent submitted that in so far Lhere is already an order issued on ?ntempt was committed by him. 3n the submission made axid fhat also been placed on record v| R-3). Leamed counsel for the| as respondent is concemed, 17.9.2009 and therefore, no c| Taldng into considerati| respondent had already issijied a letter for compliance of fhe Court order on 17.9.2009 fol|owed by other letters (Annexure R- 2), no contempt can be said tc| be committed ty ftie respondent. The grievance, if any, v^ of Sub Divisional Officer, pendency of the petition, he as against the inaction on fhe part Janjgir (R) and now during fhe las also passed an order regarding joinmg of fhe petitioner. Therefore, ftie rule again|st the respondent is dlscharged. The petition is accordin^ly finally disposed of. -sd/l <;hrb Man.^M;Xst