1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1323 OF 2009 (Shailendra s/o Patru Telse and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1329 OF 2009 (Yogesh s/o Anandrao Potale vs. State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1330 OF 2009 (Gaurao s/o Ravindra Gaikwad and others vs. State of Maharashtra) WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2088 OF 2009 (Bhanudas Maroti Khatik vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND P.B.VARALE, JJ. DATED : JULY 22, 2010 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. At the outset, Smt. Taiwade, learned Counsel for Maharashtra Knowledge Corporation Ltd., invited our attention to the judgment dated 16/10/2009 passed by Division Bench at Aurangabad Bench of this Court in a group of writ petitions (Writ Petition No.6828/2008 and others) and submitted that issues and questions raised in the present writ 2 petitions are squarely covered by that judgment. Shri Parchure, learned Counsel for the petitioners, after having gone through the judgment dated 16/10/2009, fairly submitted that all the points raised by the petitioners in these writ petitions were also raised in those writ petitions and findings recorded by the Division Bench squarely cover the points involved in the present writ petitions also. In the circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 16/10/2009 passed in Writ Petition No.6828/2008. JUDGE JUDGE khj