aii^i w ft-)i+ '^SS ^n^'sFRT^ '3~ST -i<l'41<1'll, »T|I'M'I<B, faK'll'My *11*1CTI g,^|q,--"""--""---"—"-----^200 3(I^[ 'q^^ ('iq?3°l<t4) wiiw^ffig sn^T Anoop R^in Ghouhan, Soii of Gailpat Lal Chouliaa, piged about 55 years, workiug on the post of Bla^ter, Resident of CMDC Barmia Mines Narvdapur) Tahsil Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (CG) 1. State of C]ih.attisgarh, fhrougti fiie Secretary, Mines and^iaerals, DKSBhawaa, Raipur (CG) 2, T'he Mana^uig Director, Chhattisgarh MiD.eral DevelopBien Bhavvaii, R3 3. 'liie ypecis DevelopTnei!|t Ring Road N 4. The Officer Mines, Tah; Fiit Petitioa uader Article S Mr. V.K. Paudey, leanied co\ Mrs. .Sinita Ghai, leamed PU Heard. i By the uistaat petition, tlie respondeuts to consider his repr^sentation the petitioner has prayed befo4 proiuotion/upgradation after coin|{ service as per rules. chl-4fcll<11^ "WI^f^^^ <f^i-^l< ^TsiRmsn^T |t . Corporation tg Road No.l^ Sona Kliaii ir, Distt. Raipiu' Duty Oftlcer (Admuiistration), Miueral Corporatiort, Sona Khau Bhawan, fo.l, Raipur, Distt, Raipur (CG} incharge (Assistant Zeologist) Baiinia jil Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (CG) ot' ln< .uisel for the petitioner. for fhe State. petitioner is seekmg direction to the of Annexure P/ 4 whereby respondent No.2 to extend hitu. pletion of 14 years six nioths of his arofi^iNtagOTi^yiFa-iRiiiir—FS/95—11/2008—i,oo,ooo. T ~TS[ "llNI<>t<<, ®Tll'M<l<o,[qdl'My *ii*«nig,tiiq,"---—••-•-•"•••--—-"--•^200 sn^T rf^! (tc^y<fi) aii^i ^i^m? VSI 31K5T Shllfi TOirwaftg aii^i Leamed counsel for the pd under respondent No.2, wlio ha'|re thaa. 12 years and upto proniotion/upgradation. This fac|i siEuated eniployees vide order of .fljnnexure has been denied the above right nlfc frdsh coufcs beeu considered iu this regard, not pressing this petition on m.ei liberty to fhe petitioiter to fUe No.2 for redressal ofMs grievancel m.ay be directecl to be decided witl) Haviug heard leanied petition is disposed of v.ifh Ub| representation before respon.dent| ta this petition, along with eopy withia a period of 10 days fi-oni inade, respondent No.2 shall furth.er period of six weeks representafion in accordaace with| Dle g>I coils •tillti'l'il-l Nl^cif'? 'fe3t <(°ltSK •^TSifiCTSII^I Li|tioner subnuts that atl tlie euiployees served fh.e organization for more 24 years, are entitted for Iflity was extended to other smiuariy ^jnnexure P/'3. However, the petitioner |and iiis representation lias also not fi-irttier subiuits that though he is at this stage ,however, he piays for representation before respondent Js raised ui fhis petition aad the sanie 1ft a specified period. 4isel for the petitioner, the histaut ;rty to fhe petitioner to file fresh No.2 detailiag tiie grievances raised fhe petition aad copy of this order Ijoday. On such representation being ilsid.er aad decide fiie same wifhin a (rom. the date of receipt of the law. ^ -~^ Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge s;