1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1307 OF 2010 Deshmukh Ramchandra Birajdar ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others ....Respondents. Shri. B.N. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 8th April, 2010 PER COURT : 1. By this petition, the petitioner is raising objection to the construction permission granted in favour of respondents by the State Government. 2. According to the petitioner, the appeal is competent in view of Section 47 of the M.R.T.P. Act. The petitioner contends that he is one of the owner of shop premises and he is disputing the permission granted in favour of the developer in respect of raising construction. As appeal as contemplated under section 47, can be presented by applicant, 2 aggrieved by the order granting permission on condition or refusing permission under section 45 of the Act. The petitioner cannot be considered as a person in whose favour either permission is granted on condition or on whose application seeking permission have been turned down. The petitioner is the person who is objecting the permission already granted in favour of respondents herein. The appeal as presented by the petitioner herein has rightly been turned down by the State Government. The petition is devoid of substance and hence, stands rejected. The petitioner is at liberty to avail any other remedy available under the law. [ R.M. BORDE, J. ] ssc/wp1307.10