Petitioner Shyamlay Rai Son of Rasmay Rai; aged abou‘i 42 yearss, Riavmage P.V.43, P3. Pankhajur, District Uttar Easter, Kanker ($3.) Versus State of ChhattBgarhs Thmugh : Tha Respondent msmc: i‘v‘iagE5trate, Kanker, Dismct Utiei Easter, Kanker (C.G.) {Petition under Section 482 cf the CLP Q.) ($3; Hon‘ble Mr“ 1P1 sharmas J!) Presentz~ Mr. Vishnu Koshta, counsel for ’the petitioner. MLQamrui Aziz, Pane! lawyer for the respondentistate. ORAL ORDER iPassed an 3rd Nevembar, 2999) 1‘ The inetitioner ha$ filed this petition for quashment of the order dated 2342009 pasoed by the Additionai Sessions Judge‘in Qriminai Revioion No.4!2QOQ affirming the order dated 20‘442008 passed by the Judioiai Magistrate Firet Gigs; Bhanupratappun in Criminal Caee No‘3612909 (MJC No‘OIZGQS) whereby learned Judicial Magistrate Firet Clasei Bhanupraiappur has rejected the appiicaiion filed by the petitioner under Section 4.57 of the Code of Cfioiinai Procedute, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thel out of 122 cattle, some cattle have been died due to negligent of Gouehala lncharge. He eeeke permiseion of this Court to withdraw thie petition with liberty to file appropriate aoplicetlon in terms of Section 7 of the Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Presentation Aoti 2004.] eepeoially relating to monthly reports from Goushala 3t Aooordinglyi the oetition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty“ However, if the petitioner tiles an application under $eotion 7 of the Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Aot, 20041 the trial Court is under obligation to oali monthly reports from Goushala. / so ‘ ‘\)3 ‘ T. P. Sham“ ‘ Judges / UGH GOURT QF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPU CLMJPNQ£45 of 290$ H R » >/