IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2545 of 2011(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.M.IQBAL, S/O.SHAMSUDEEN KUNJU, AGED 47 YEARS, THEKKEVALIYATH, VARAVILA PO, VAVVAKKAVU, KARUNAGAPPALLY KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KERALA STATE FARMERS DEBT RELIEF COMMISS ISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.2545 OF 2011(P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In Ext.P3 application filed by the petitioner, respondent passed Ext.P5 order dated 19.8.2008, holding that the petitioner is entitled to 50% of the debt relief and limited the same to Rs.1 lakh. According to the petitioner, a 3rd party has now filed an application for review of the said order, and that on receipt thereof, Ext.P7 notice has been issued requiring the petitioner to appear before the Commission. It is this notice which is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. Even if there is substance in what the petitioner contends, the right course open to the petitioner is to appear before the Commission and resist the prayer made for review of Ext.P5. Therefore the writ petition now filed against the notice is misconceived. 3. Petitioner has a complaint that despite the request made he has not so far been issued a copy of the application for review. If the petitioner makes an application in accordance with the rules laid down in this respect, petitioner will be serve a copy there of. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE WPC.No. /09 :2 :