HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Ct.M.P. N0. 737 OF 2010 PETITIONERS VBRSUS RESPONDENTS P.K. Sahu,S/o Shri Vasudeo.Sahu aged about 48 years, Brauch Manager Dena Bank, Power House Braach Nandni Road, Bhilai, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). TIie Authorized Officer & Chief Manager, Dena Baak, Regioiial Office, near Jauain Tatkies, Raipur (C.G.). State of Chliattisgarh through its PoUce Station Chavm, Durg (C.G.). Smt Haus Maia Singh, W/o Shri Hari Prakash Singh, aged about 45 years, R/o MIG-II Qr. No. 2962, M.P.H.B. Industrial Estate, Bhilai, Teh. 8s Distt. Durg (C.G.). Through-Special Power of Attoraey Shri Han Prakash Singh, S/o Late Shri Sarju Singh, aged about 49 years, residing at MIG -II, Quarter No. 2962, M.P.H.B. Industrial Estate, Bhileu, Teh. & Distt. Durg (C.G.). M/s Kumar Tim Corporate, A F>Topretorship conceni through its Proprietor Shri Kumar Raju, sitiiated at 13/1, Light Industrial Area, Bhilai TehsU and District Duig (C.G.). APPLICATION UNDEK SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CaiIMmAL PROCEDURE. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State/respondent No. 1. Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORAL-ORDER (Passedon 21/01/2011) 1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in sfaort the Code') petitioners has prayed for quashment of fhe order dated 21/6/2010 passed by Judicial Magisteate First Class, Diirg in. coniplaint case No. 656/2010 1. w z- ^ whereby Court has proceeded agauist the Maiiager, Dena Baak and authorized OfBcer/ Chief Manager for fhe offence punisbable under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 469/34 of thc Indian Penal Code. After soine argument learaed counsel for the respondent No. 2 subuaits that opportuiuty of adducing additional ewdence before the trial Court be provided to hjia and same would be necesssay for proper adiiumistration ofcruaixialjustice. After perusal of order impugned, copy (rf coinplamt and ofher dociunents, I am also ofthe same view, Consequeufly, petition is allowed, Order dated 21/6/2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate Pirst Class, Dvcrg ia coinpkunt case No. 656/2010 is hereby quashed. Complamant/respondent No. 2 is permitted to exainiae witnesses iu support of his compliaat. Trial Court shaU uiake furtber inquuy. Other uiteruu appUcatious are also disnussed, Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge -^-