Cr.W.P. No. 29 of 2011 19.10.2011 Present: Mrs. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondents 1 & 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petition has been filed with the following prayers: (i) “For issuing a writ of Habeas Corpus to the respondent authorities to produce Ms. Anika Uppal d/o Sh.S.C. Uppal, r/o ward No.2, Old Road, Upper Bazar, Hamirpur, H.P. before this Hon’ble Court and to inquire from her regarding her wish to marry the petitioner ad to inquire about the contents of the writ petition w.r.t. her illegal confinement by her parents and for passing appropriate orders thereupon.” Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner belongs to different community and was well known to Ms. Anika Uppal and they earlier thought to marry, however, marriage could not be solemnized. It has further been stated for and on behalf of the petitioner that girl wanted to marry with the petitioner only after seeking the permission of the her parents and for that purpose, she went to the parents house and thereafter she could not come back. As has been alleged for the petitioner that she has been kept confined and if she is produced before this Court, then her wishes could be known about marrying with the petitioner. However, in our respectful consideration, protection of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. & another (2006) 5 SCC 475 cannot be granted. Such protection could only be extended to those major persons who are married, irrespective of caste, creed, religion and their matrimonial alliance was not being accepted by the relatives and the society. The allegation made in the petition also does not amount to any offence, as such, no search order could be issued even by the Magistrate under Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the present facts and circumstances, no case is made out to issue notice even for the production of the said girl. The writ petition, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed. However observations, made above, will not debar the petitioner to come in the matrimonial alliance with the said girl. ( R.B. Misra ), J. (Surinder Singh ),J. 19th October, 2011 (sl) Cr.W.P. No. 30/2011 19.10.2011 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondents 1 to 3. Heard. Issue notice. Notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 is being accepted by Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. Advocate General. Incharge, Police post, Majholi, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, Himchal Pradesh, shall file a detailed report on 27th October, 2011 regarding illegal detention of the persons, indicated in para 2 of the petition. List on 27th October, 2011. Copy Dasti. ( R.B. Misra ), J. (Surinder Singh ),J. 19th October, 2011 (sl)