^-1 <^ \ef3 S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARH) WRTT PETITIQN1S) N0l3 ^^ /2011. •^ PETITIONER: Upnianyu Verma, son of Mahesh Rain Verma, aged about 50 years, working as Upper Division Teacher,^w^, »<»t^s^^>x*»y gi^uni} f<aJd»^ District Baloda Bazar (Education), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents .< -^ .^$s/ .^€^ 'y'fL'y' 4<Ny ^',.'?' \<^ State of Chhatdsgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Dista-ict Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, Chhatdsgarh. 3. Joint Direetor, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA !''^^•^^^^^^^^ a; ashok PETmQNER RESPONDENTS HIGHCOURTOFCHHATnSGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1358 W201 1 Upmanyu Verma Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Othere (Wr'rt Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnih<Ari, J. Present:- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ShriC,>ta^nt,K.Rao,Adtooc^eforthepetitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy; Advocate General for the State/ respondents. ORDER(ORAU (Passedon this 14th day of March, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for ttie peBtioner subm'rts that the petitionsr is entitled to benefrt of two advance increments on account of having passed B.T.I. examination in the year 1981 before his appointment i.e; on 10.08.1981, at his owncost. tt is submitted thatthe issue involved in the present petitjon is no longer fesintegK, as the same has been finally decided bythe Supreme Cpurtjn AshaSaxena y. StateofM.P.&OtS4. It is further submltted that this Court has alsotaken a simitar view in its order dated 6-2-2009 passed inW.P.(S) No.6257 of2008. t.eamett counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in WA.No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the Judgnienlof the Supreme Court in AshaSaxena (supra) and the order passed by this Oourt in another W.A.No.87 of 2009, directions hav® been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two adyance increments as per the circular dated 21-^-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pfadesh, after verificationofthefacts pleaded inthe petition. Learned counset appearing Torthe State submils Vnat the case of the p^itipner woutd atso be cpnsidered on the same lines. In view of the above, the petiUon is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authprities tp decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments, as per the cireular dated 21-9-1974, issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification ofthe facts pleaded in Uie petition wrthin a period of 8 weeks from today. Sd.'- satfeh^? 12009(lil)MPJR(SC)59