IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11026 of 2010 1. HARIBANSH NARAYAN SINGH S/O LATE SRI RAM SARAN SINGH R/O VILL.- BARI PAITHANA, P.S.- ISLAMPUR, DISTT.- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY - CUM - MIDDLE EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, NALANDA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, NALANDA 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, NALANDA 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, HILSA, NALANDA 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, HARNAUT, NALANDA 8. THE HEADMASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL DHABA, EKANGARSARAI, NALANDA ----------- 2 12.10.2010 Heard the petitioner. The writ petition is totally misconceived . The petitioner was suspended in the year 2004. He challenged his order of suspension by filing CWJC No.114 of 2005, which was disposed of on 16.3.2006 holding that as petitioner had been suspended he would be entitled to subsistence allowance only as per law. He has filed this writ application again challenging his suspension on merit saying that is a new ground .This Court wonders the competency of lawyer ,who advised for filing of such misconceived writ application. Once the challenge was made before this Court, there cannot be challenged again. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J)