C^VA^^, . i: ".'^ iL^;" "-^' o S ;i^!'i-t) •^) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (Q) NQ^J"-,'^ L2011 ^; ~~^ IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; AND BETWEEN : PETITIONERS \/i^4 ^yx^ ^y/^" ^>" A°' -t? .'•'? ^ ..-%-• ,<s:' ..• ^<yy >^3' Y o- RESPONDENTS ff^" _J^' 1. Uma Shankar Sahu, son of Late Shri Budhram Sahu, aged about 48 years 2. Melaram Sahu, son of Late Shri Jhagar Sahu, aged about 43 years 3. Kunj Bihar Sahu, son of Shri Shyamji Sahu, aged about 32'years 4. N.K. Tonde, son of Shri M.D. Tonde, aged about 42 years All residents of Village Mohatarateli, District Lormi, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS ^' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Sectary, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Collector, Bilaspur, Collectorate, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ^-4. Station House Officer, Police Station, Lormi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Lormi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7. Vijay Kumar Gandharwa, son of n.ot known to the petitioner, age not known to the petitioner, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Amrito Das, Advo. si^-il b ^" Mohatarateli, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh L . ' 8. Dhanesh ShrivastairfTson of not known to the petitioner, age not known to the petitioner, Rojgar Sahayak, Gram Panchayat, Mohatarateli, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND FOR ISSUANCE OF OTHER SUITABLE WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS ti B HIGH COiJRT OF CHnATTISGARH AT BiIASPlJR rRIT PETmdN ."Cr.'a No. 6709 of201 PETITIONERS LESFONDENTS Uma. Shank.ar & 01'liers- VRRSIJS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER AMTCLE 226 OF THE CONS-HTUnON OF INDIA Present: S'nri Amrito Das, Advocate tbrthe petitioners. Siui V.V.S.Moortuy, Dsputy Advocate Geiicral £xthc Stat resDondent No 1 to 4. 4, /D-""^^ 1 r UE^^CU. u^a 16 da.v ofNovember, 2011) Bv this oetitioa. the Detitionere seek »direction to the resDondeiit No. 4 to reaster an FJ.R. a..2amst. the resnondent No, 7 aad 8 fbr their illegsl and corritDt a.ctiou diirine the deveiODmeiital activities in villn.ee Mohatet'ateli and vilia.ge Ka.bra Tola. Case ofthe Detitioners arethat.'the viUaeers ofv'lia.ee Mohtarateii. District BilasDur nxnde a comuia.im'. IQ the Colieetor- BilasDUf- asainsi. the Sa.roanch. Secretarv'. S-oisar Sahavak and Enaiueer regardins the alleged fiaanciai iiTeaiiarities. The oetit.ioner-. are ajso tlie nartv to the said comoiamt. Siace no action h.a-s been taken a&a.nist the resoondent No. 7 aad 8 a.nd EO oflence has been reeistered a.gainst t.hem. tto.is. tbis netition is being c'referred bv rtiem. It a.0Deara that tfaa net.itioners are not directlv a.ffected. Thev cl&im lociis on the basis ihat they were also parties to the complamt made bv tlie villa.ge.re 'to fhe Collector. Be that as it mav. il the oetitioners a.re endeavoiirins t.o sesk redressa.l ofthe grieva.nces oft.he 'vill^.siers. the aODFODriate fonim woiild not be the present petitioiL birt a. public interest iitigation DetitioiL ifso advised, In view of the above. the writ netition is dismissed uu the sroimd ofmamtatuabilitv. No order a-sto coste. ^ Mmt - Sd/- SATBH K. ANGNIHOM Judge 1