wm e nr^PK INTHEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION FS1 N0. 1'2-1 "7 /2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPmATE WRIT(S) /ORDER(S) /DIRECTIONISI ETC. PETITIONER ^^^^^&=^^^ RESPONDENTS ^>^> \^i5^ .^.••".^•\'^ ^yy ?^ ^^ ^^\\c~ ^s^ <$• ^ Smt. Sunita Malakar W/o Shri Arkhit Malakar, aged about 25 years, R/o village Haradi, Post- Madawa, Tahsil- Dabhara, District - Janjgir-Chanipa [C.G.] VERSUS ^l] State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Vibhag [Department of Women and child Welfare] D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dhabhara, Janjgir-Champa [C.G.]. District .3] Bhola Ram Paatel, S/o Shri Birbal Patel, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Haradi %.Udf<lf€u ^4] Neela Bai W/o Bhuwan Lal, aged about 30 years, ^ 5] Jagmati W/o Rupsai, aged about 28 years. ^ 6] Savitri W/o Bhagat Singh Respondent no. 3 to 6 are resident of village Haradi, Post Madawa, Tahsil- Dhabhara, District Janjgir-Champa [C.G.]. 7] Gram Panchayat- Haradi, through Sarpanch, Village- Haradi, Post Madawa, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa [C.G.]. ^') XI-HC-78 *<1*1MI ShW^ 3ST '<|iqicl<<, gTdu'is, fsjcfltiy ..^..<^l?:.'3w.lt.. W[ 2006 3l1^?Tira^7 (qgtgg^ET) 3TI^T ERT f^lNi cISIT3II^Tstitl S^ITWHfitTSn^T 02.01.2007 coilnsel Dabhfera Shri S.K.Tiwari, learned Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learnecf Heard. The petitioner by the instai|)t dated 04.09.2006 passed by the| Officer, Janpad Panchayat, been appointed as Angan Badi K^r Haradi. Learned counsel for the pe^ of respondent No. 4 is contrary t^ this regard from time to time Executive Officer could not have was not eligible for the appointm^r No.3 - Sarpanch. He further appointment was brought to the by way of representation vide No.2 has not enquired info the alij Annexure P-7 and therefore he hats I have heard learned counslel 1 have perused the Considering the grievance rais^d petition against the appointment Karyakarta ofAngan Badi Kendra| opinion that ends of justice will for the petitioner. G.A. for respondent No.1. petition has challenged the order respondent No. 2/Chief Executive whereby respondent No. 4 has K^Fyakarta in the Anganbadi Kendra, <*ii<(Fci41-i tfit«iT?'te^<.Ri+di<. ^sF^irgn^r (itioner submits that the appointment the circular issued by the State in and the respondent No.2/ Chief lappointed respondent No.4 as she i^nt being relative of the respondent |submits that irregularity in the rlotice of the Chief Executive Officer ia|nnexure P-7. However respondent i^gations made by the petitioner vide a|s fi!ed this instant petition. is|el for the petitioner. annexed with the petition. by the petitioner in the instant t?f respondent No.4 as Angan Badi IHardi this Court is of the considered |be served if the instant Retition Js dociiments P.T.O. XI-HC-78 *ii*icii ai^TT^ 731 .<||A||(iq, ®Tf1^'|6,(slcll^y Ai-..^:.f..^<.^2J^/. ^ 200^ 3ll^i Mach (l^t^8'^) an^T^ir^icb aW3?I^Tsbli°ti ?Tarar HficT a'n^r -2.- <ni<l?CT<fl-< ll*«lTfftecfl'<Pl«l< ^TSri^TSn^T '^' ^ •li-S "q lilltO disposed of with iiberty to the against the appointment of resporjdent within 15 days from today. Aft^ respondent No.2 shall enquire ii|ito petitioner against the appointment] opportunity of hearing to the respt order in accordance with law withili the receipt of such representation. aetitioner to make representation No.4 before respondent No.2 ST receipt of representation, the the grievances raised by the of respondent No.4 after afrording sndent No.4 and pass appropriate n a further period of 90 days from Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge .^ P.T.O.