... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4289 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.21231 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Ms Archana B. Kaloji for the Applicant. Shri H.G. Misar for the Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 24, 2006. : JULY 24, 2006. : JULY 24, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.2. Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.2. Considering the averments made in the Application and considering the fact that Appeal is by a claimant in a Petition under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE