CRIMINAL REVISION NO.253 OF 2011 (O&M) :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 09, 2011 Smt. Maina .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 5. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. An application moved by the prosecution to summon the respondents under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was declined on more than one occasion. Again another application was filed without change of any circumstance, as alleged. This application, the Court did not entertain by observing that earlier orders were not challenged and time CRIMINAL REVISION NO.253 OF 2011 (O&M) :{ 2 }: and again applications are being filed. The earlier applications, declining to summon the respondents have not been challenged in any manner. I do not find any justification to interfere in the impugned order once the petitioner has allowed the earlier orders to acquire finality. The present petition is dismissed as not pressed, as prayed. However, this will not be a bar for the petitioner if she wants to challenge earlier order(s) by the Trial Court but in accordance with law. November 09, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE