Item No. 30 & 41, DJ/- SBCWP NO. 9212/2010 Pratap Singh Bithiya Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. Order dt: 07th October, 2010 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9212/2010 Pratap Singh Bithiya Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. & S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9258/2010 Geeta Patel Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER ::: 07th October, 2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Rajesh Johsi } Mr. Vijay Bishnoi }- for the petitioners. --- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The impugned notice dated 21.09.2010 has been issued by the Deputy Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur under Section 30 (2) of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act 2001 seeking to remove the members from the Office of cooperative society Rajasthan Cooperative Daily Federation (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'RCDF'). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners urged that the notice does not fall within the parameters of Section 30 of the Act and, therefore, the same is wholly without jurisdiction and deserves to be set aside. Item No. 30 & 41, DJ/- SBCWP NO. 9212/2010 Pratap Singh Bithiya Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. Order dt: 07th October, 2010 2/2 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned notice is of dated 29.09.2010, which has been received by the petitioners few days back, it is considered expedient to direct to the petitioners to submit representation/reply to the notice narrating all the legal grounds available to them and which they have raised in the present writ petition before the respondent- competent authority showing causes as to how the impugned notice is bad in law. It is expected from the respondent- competent authority to decide such representation or reply of the notice in accordance with law. It goes without saying that if any decision is taken by the respondents against the petitioners upon such explanation or reply, the petitioners will be at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J. DJ/- 3 & 41