1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.15 of 2009 ----------- Ram Bahdur Rai son of Dhuri Rai,@ Raghunandan Rai, resident of village-Marar, Tola-Bhalwahiya, P.S. Parsa, District-Saran. Plaintiff.. Appellant… Appellant-Petitioner. Versus 1. Most. Sona Kuer wife of Ramdeen Rai alias Dina Rai, deceased. 2. Birendra Rai, 3. Ramudre Rai son of Late Shama Rai, 4. Kiran Kumari minor daughter of Late Shama through guardian mother Dhama Devi, (Respondent No.10) All residents of village Marar tola , Bhalwahiya, P.S. Parsa, P.O. Marar, District-Saran, 5. Nirmala Devi D/o Late Shama Rai, W/o Gujja Rai, 6. Ramawati Devi D/o Late Shama Rai W/o Umesh Rai, Both residents of village-Nawal Tola, P.O. Aami, P.S. Dighwara, District-Saran. 7. Baijnath Rai 8. Baroda Rai 9. Bankim Rai 10. Buneshwar Rai 11. Jai Narain Rai 12. Jai Nath Rai 13. Smt. Malapati Devi, D/o Ramdeen Rai, deceased 14. Smt. Dhana Devi W/o Shama Rai, 15. Smt. Sudama Devi W/o Baijnath Rai 16. Manoj Rai son of Baroda Rai All R/o village –Marar tola Bhalwahiya, P.S. Parsa, District-Saran 17. Shushila Devi W/0 Ajay Rai, resident of Pithaghat Rampur Bazar P.S. Garkha , District- Saran 18. Urmila @ Parmila W/o Tarkeshwar Rai resident of Rampur Bazar, P.S. Garkha, District-Saran. 19 Smt. Bedamo Devi W/o Bankim Rai 20. Smt. Ram Ratiya Devi W/o Bhuneshwar Rai, 21. Smt. Urmila Devi wife of Jai Narain Rai 22. Malti Devi W/o Jainath Rai …Defendants Ist set- Respondent 1st set-Respondednt 1st set- Opposite Parties. 23. Lal Rai @ Lalit Rai 24. Rajendra Rai both sons of Rambali Rai, @ Bali Rai, deceased 25. Smt. Dachami Devi D/o Ram Bali Rai, deceased W/o Ram Naresh Rai . All residents of village-Marar tola Bhalwahiya, P.S. Parsa, District-Saran and Opp. Party no.25 resident of village Jhaumua Tola, P.S. Parsa, District-Saran …Defendants 1st set- Respondents 2nd set-Respondent 2nd set- Opposite Parties ------- For the Petitioner : M/s Abbas Haidar and Saba Ashfaque, Advocates. For the Opp. Parties : None. --------- 2 06/ 31.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This civil review has been filed by the plaintiff- appellant-appellant-petitioner challenging the order of this court dated 20.11.2008, by which Second Appeal No. 182 of 2005 was dismissed and the judgments and decree of both the learned courts below were affirmed. The petitioner had filed Title Suit No. 154 of 1982 for declaration that the suit properties were joint family properties and the deed of gift executed by defendant no.1 in favour of defendants no. 2 to 6 was not operative to the extent of plaintiff’s share and for the other ancillary reliefs. The said suit was dismissed by the learned trial court, whereafter the petitioner filed Title Appeal No. 17 of 1993, which was also dismissed, whereafter the petitioner filed Second Appeal No. 182 of 2005, which has been dismissed by the order under challenge in the instant civil review. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that there is no error apparent on the face of the order under challenge nor there is any fresh material, which was not available to the petitioner at the time of passing of the impugned order nor does this court find any other reason to take a different view. Accordingly, this civil review is dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N.Hussain, J. ) 3