BEFORE THE HON'BLE HJGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETXTION fiO.^^^/2002 PETITIONER JAYANT MUKHERJEE, S/'O. LATE S.K. MUKHERJEE, AGED ABOUT 47, WORKINO AS DATA ENTRY OPERATOR IN THE OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAND RECORD, BILASPUR DISTRICT- BILASPUR (CHHATriSGARH) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ^/ ^ '^ .:•-•''.<0^& ^0'.-^^ .^ l..-'/T%'' ^:.^' ^ 0>l "^f^ >1%^TE OF CHHAmSGARH, ^••^i%ROUGH: SECRETARY. ••• ^JREVENUE DEPARTMENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RUPUR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH). 2. THE COMMISSIONER LAND RECORD, RAIPUR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH). 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAND RECORD, BILASPUR, DISTRICT- BILASPUR (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 sn^TTi f((?I ^1^1 ^H ^fed bisMa " ^^^^'^7'^. 's^ ^'IFIRP?, »^1+rl®,[«<«i*f>i< ffffWM Shllttl .t^-..P.:Ap.:.......2^VA2r.l ^S^St' 200 311^1 <WIW ^lfetl 02.01.2003 Slui Azad Siddiqui, couase: Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Dy Heard. Havtag lieanl teamed Court is not uiclincd to entertainl ordcr of transfer is thc subjcct in^ cotnsel recdid As it appears fcova. the at Bilaspur siace last many yeara- Iie has been transferred to Maha^amund. Aygyisved thercwitfa, the petitioner faas approached fhi4 cate AdnuttedJy, this is not a is contended fhat the petitioner post. In that view of fhe inatter transfer is an iacidence of servicd decide where a particular employ does not consider this to be a fit is catled for. It was then contendled that the traasfer is in the +i<<i<-t'fl-t tfiHcif 4 ft^i <[«t<;i< ^SlpOTSII^I fbr the petitioner. A.G. forfheState. for the peiitioner, the the writ pcti.tk)n in which thc tter ofchallcnge. the petitioner was posted Vide order-dated 24.10.2002 Court for relicf. of fiTequcnt transfers iior it (loes not hold a transferabfe ^nd considering the fact that aad it is for Ifee eiaployer to r^e is to be posted, the Court dase ia which aav mterfereace XI-HC-22 311^1 ^il f<;-fi?ti 311^1 sft*«q»wea .V 'S^ -^WWi, W^[W , [«!WI*lli< ,^ ^--^- 3TI^T,-q?ra? 2^?//(fZ-— WqcfTSbHlt) "HT. 200 ^C^fS' nud-scssion and going to .fajmify. But, adnuttedfy fh4 Bflaspur and as such ftie inove out of Bilaspiir wffl not if so advised, inay approach transfer fer a inonfli or two. p^cc order oftransfer does not arisd. With thc aforesaid obserl Conscquentfy, M.W.P I.A.No.7569/02 for ui^ent hea(ing *l*li<'t<il-t lllcil'tt'fe^t <{^itsi<. ^T 3!fiOT StI^F of transfer wffl disrupt ttic petitkiner's wife is posted at qfiestion of chUdren requiring to ^rise. At any rate, the petitioaer, |the aufhorities for deferring the |The qzifistioa of settutg aside the l^ation, the petition is disnussed. plo. 1464/02 for stay and also staad disposed of. Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge