IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 197 OF 2005 Shantilal Premji Gada. ... Appellant. Versus. State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents. Shri A.R.Pande for the Appellant. Mrs.Geeta Mulekar A.G.P. for the Respondents. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED : 15th March, 2005. P.C.: 1. Considering the nature of reliefs sought in the Notice of Motion, the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant submitted that the Notice of Motion be directed to be heard and decided expeditiously by the learned trial Judge by keeping all contentions on merit open. The prayer made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant is reasonable. 2. Accordingly the Appeal is disposed of by directing that the learned trial Judge will hear and decide the Notice of Motion No.363 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible and in any event on or before 19th April 2005. All questions on merits are expressly kept open. The learned trial Judge will decide the Notice of Motion without being influenced by the earlier Ad-interim order passed in the Notice of Motion. 3. The parties and the concerned Court to act on an authenticated copy of this order. Judge.