-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1328 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1328 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1328 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL (L.) NO. 174 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.142 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 53/2005 IN PETITION NO.477/2003 Mathurdas Jamnadas Paleja .. Appellant. V/s. 1. Shri Uday Hansraj Paleja & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mr.R.M.Agarwal i/by Sean Wassoodew for the Appellant. Ms.K.C.Nichani with Ms.N.Z.Khapre for the Respondents. ---- CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. SRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. SRI ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and learned counsel for the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the notice of motion as well as affidavit in reply and the affidavit in rejoinder. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). -: 2 :- (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)