/ W&S lififlCI IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVIEW PETITION N0. c^ /2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS -.."^ ,0*- O''.^ 2. <<-£?""\^C^ ^^^^u ./• 3. Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava, S/o. B.P. Shrivastava, Aged about 39 years, Graduate Civil Engineer, R/o. H-2/32, Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, BilaspurfC.G.j. APPLICATION FOR REVIEW fis MODIFICATION BY RECALLING OF ORDER DATED 06.12.2006 PASSED IN W.P.NO. 2145/2004 BY HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI. S.K.AGNIHOTM AND APPROPRIATE DIRECTION. n H!GH COURT OF JUDiCATURE AT B!LASPUR (CHHATTiSGARH) Revlew Petition No.8 of 2007 Saniay Kumar Shrivastava -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh Sc-Others Prsssnt^ Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate; ShriV.V.S. Muilhv. Dv. A.G.: For oetitioner. For resDondents. (Passed on 15'" Februarv. 2007} SATISH KUMAR AGNiHOTRi. J. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on account of dismissai of writ petition No.2145/2004 by order dated 6'" December 2006 on the ground that the petitioner being daily wager has no right to the post and as such no direction to reinstate the petitioner on the post of daiiy wager can be passed, the Government is not looking into the case of the petltioner. Learned counsel further submits thatthe Government is wiiiing to consider his case. The revievv petition is disposed of wlth a direction that dismissal of writ petition No.2145 of 2004 shaii not come in the wav of consideratlon of the State Govemment on its own. In view ofthis order, M.{C.)P. No.296/2007 stands disposed of. Barve Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge