HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH._B1LASPUR WRiT PETSTION (S) N0. 6840/2010 "'^ 1 ^f :iC. PETST!ONER Ram Raja Patei, aged about 59 years, S/o Late Shri Mangal Prasad Pate!, Head Master, Government Middie School, Lingiadih, Biock Biiha, Distt. Bi!aspur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schoo! Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Director, Pubiic Instructions, Raipur Joint Director, Accounts, Pension & Treasury Biiaspur (C.G.) Djstrict Education Officer, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur(C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Block Biiha, Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) The Principie Government Middle Schoo! Lingiadih, Distt. BIJaspur (C.G.) WRiT PETITION UNDER ARTiCLE.2260EJHE_CO!lSTJTUT^N.OF INDSA Appearance: Mr. K.S. Pawar, Advocate forthe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate for the respondents. ORALGRDER (26.11.2010) SUNiL KUiVSAR SSNHA.J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Issue invoived in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitied to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. He submltsthat the issue snvolved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admlnlstratlve Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 5S othersVs. State of M.P. and others), wherein, it was held thatthe simiiarlysituated teachers are entltled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of inltial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Cjvii) No. 6892/93. The Said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitied to reguiar pay scaie the date of initiai appointment. WRIT PETiTION (S) N0. 6840/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another 0/V.P.(S) No. 813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.07,has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of Initiai appointment. Learned counsei for the parties jointly submits thatthis case Is squarely covered by the decisson of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (Supra) In view ofthat, thls petitlon Is ailowed in the same terms. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications made by the State regardlng facts pieaded in the petitlon. \—~ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge '; '^