IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2010 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2504 of 2004(A) ------------------------------------- (C.C.954/98OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PERUMBAVOOR, CRL.A. 33/2003 OF ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, NORTH PARAVOOR) ......... PETITIONER/APELLANT/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------- T.A. MUHAMMED, S/O. ABDUL KHADER, THAZHATHEKUDY (H), PURUMATTOM, PUTHUPPADY, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALIYAR, S/O. VEERAS, THELAMPURAM (H), VENGOLA VILLAGE, VENGOLA KARA, P.O. ALLAPRA, PERUMBAVOOR. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.NAVAS R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P.No.2504 of 2004 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated this the 10 th day of December, 2010 ORDER The accused in C.C.No.954/1998 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Perumbavoor for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.11804 of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. 3. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the court orders, shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj