1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16785 of 2011 1.T. VIJAY 2.KARTHICK, S/o RAMAPANDI 3.KARTHICK, S/O PALANICHAMY 4.ALAMURALI 5.BABU SHANMUGAM @ KUTTI APPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 5 Vs THE STATE THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, CR NO.532/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.R.LAXMAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. R.RAMACHANDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 448, 427, 506(i) of IPC and 379 (NP) of IPC in Crime No.532 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1 to A5 and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that it is a case of a dispute between the landlord and the tenant and the petitioners are the landlords and the de-facto complainant is the tenant. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case and it appears to be a case of dispute between the landlords and the tenant and the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that this is a case of dispute between the landlords and the tenant, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every day at 5.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I RAMANATHAPURAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM 4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. K.R.LAXMAN Advocate SR.No.44720 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16785 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 TR : 21.12.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/