IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3629 of 2011 ====================================================== Sayeedur Rahman .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 3 23-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The petitioner is stated to have deposited a sum of Rs.38,415 before the Electricity Board under the order of the Court. His grievance is that his representation as directed still remains to be considered. It is fairly acknowledged that the representation was sent by registered post. The show cause filed by the Board states that no such representation has been received. The allegations and counter allegations are irrelevant in view of the fact that now the Board admittedly has a copy of his representation as pointed out at annexure- 3 to the contempt application. Let the competent authority of the Board now dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of one month from the date of Patna High Court MJC No.3629 of 2011 (3) dt.23-11-2011 2 receipt/production of a copy of this order. The contempt application stands disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)