IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36583 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR, S/O RAJ NANDAN SINGH @ RAJ NANDAN PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE-SUKERBEGCHAK, P.S. KHOSRUPUR, DISTRICT- PATNA. …………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……..OPPOSITE PARTY . ----------- 2 2.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. While this Court is not inclined to grant bail of the petitioner keeping in view his such prayer has already been rejected on two earlier occasions by order dated 30.04.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 49930 of 2007 and order dated 7.10.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 18540 of 2009, this Court would definitely go into the question of earlier observation made by it as with regard to expediting the trial and concluding it within a period of 9 months. In this respect from the impugned order it is found that the petitioner was produced for the first time on 16.07.2010, in the trial court and thereafter charges have already been framed against the petitioner. Thus, it is clear that the prosecution of the petitioner in the present trial could not proceed due to inaction on the part of the Superintendent 2 of Beur Jail, who despite repeated orders of the trial court had not produced him before the trial court. On the alleged ground of his being wanted in connection other criminal cases. Moreover, the criminal antecedent of petitioner is also not satisfactory. Now that the petitioner has been allowed to appear before the trial court and charges have been framed, this Court would direct the trial court to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is expedited, so that the same gets concluded on an early date preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of accused. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application is dismissed. Bhardwaj/PN (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)