IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8451 of 2010 Rajesh Kumar, S/o Bam Bahadur Singh, resident of Village- Sarmastpur, P.S. Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur…..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 20. 04. 2010. Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Pawan Kumar Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 240/07 dated 15. 12. 2007, registered under Sections 405, 406, 418 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, the petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 1, 17, 390/- on 13. 12. 2004 from Punjab National Bank, Kamalpura Branch in the town of Muzaffarpur, for running a poultary firm, but he did not pay the installment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client is prepared to return the entire loan amount along with interest within a period of three months from today on installments. In the aforesaid background, the petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 50,000/- in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and balance amount along with interest must be paid within two months thereafter. In case of deposit of Rs. 50, 000/- made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Rajesh Kumar, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. (West) Muzaffarpur, in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 240/07, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. and subject to further condition; (a) that one of the bailors must be Government Servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner. However, the petitioner must deposit the balance amount within a period of three months from today and in case, the petitioner fails to discharge his liabilities within the time frame, then it would be construed that prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail has finally been rejected by this Court and in that case, the petitioner would be obliged to surrender in the court below and would have to seek regular bail, if so advised. It goes without saying that if money, as referred to above, is deposited by the petitioner then the same may be transferred to the the Bank on proper verification. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)