wwrb IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.93“? /201 1. l l I ! / Ghanshyam Sharma, son of Mahabeer i Shanna, aged labout 50 years, working as Head Master, Govt. r Primary Schoo‘l Sutupali, Sankuta, Block Pussour‘, Tahsil Pussour, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. K versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh, Through The 1. Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Distn‘ct Education Offlcer, District Raigarh, Chhatti‘sgarh. 3. Joint Director, Treasury and Accounts, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .mr‘A.A (CHHATTISGARH) PETITIONER: I l HIG COURT OF ‘CHHATTISGARH AT'BILASPUR } WRIT PETITION (S) No. 24537 of2011 Ghanshyam $harma. VERSUS £ State of Chhamiisgmh & Others. ? PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETYHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUHO‘N OF ‘ INDIA g SB: Hon’ble Sim Satish K. Agnihom“, J. l Preset: Shi C.J.K.Rao, Advocat r he letitioner. n r e fo t p sk Th Wye ts Shri Shahan almr, Pamel Lar for the State/respenden. ssd 09a; da fy 0 1 ) (Fae on y oMa, 2 1 d él n fth pr, intc ek Learne coune appearig ore etitione on srutions, ses permision othis ourt to Withdraw tis etition with lilty to s f C h p be make eentation in t light f circuiar dated 05.01.201 a rpres he o 1 sued by the Government of Chttisar Schoo Edation is hagh, l uc Dtmt. eparen . Learned counsel appeaing or othe has no obj ection. r f r side . ermsion of this Coult is requir to mak epresenation to 3 No pis ed e rt he'responent authories. Thus, such irection aot. b isued. td ti d cnn e s However, if pitioners make a rresation to the responden the et epent t it am ma b ns d ordnc authories, the se y e coidered and ecided in accae with law, on its own merits and perspective. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. A Sd/- i ‘ \SATISH K. ANGNH-IORI ‘t ‘ 7 Judge \" Amit H ORDER (ORAIJ