lN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUgE AT_BJLASPUR(CI‘H~IAZITISGARH) i w.P. N0. G90 /2001 EETiTlGm R.Di Sharma,‘ S/o.Late Shri V.‘P"; Shanna Aged 59 years; Retired Head Clerk; M.P. S. R. 'I‘. Corporation; Divisional Worksholo, Raipur: (C.G.) Resicient of Vaishali Nagar,: Bilaspur (c.G.) Vs .t M. P. S.R.T. Corporationy Head Officeg‘i, Habibganj r Bhopal (Mm) Through its Managing DireCtOr RESPONDENTS.‘ oURTT: \ IBH ‘\ Divisi Onal Managerf; M. P. S.R. . Corp oratian, T DivisiOnai 0££ice,; Raipur (c. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGaE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA’ EUR ESSUANCE OE WRIT IN THE 1%TURE OF CERTIORARI, MANMUS, QHEITION AND FOR SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, , fc DA PE XI«HC-22 10/12/2001 - Pefl‘honer by Shrl Ashish Shrivasfava, Advocate. Respondenf by Shrl ‘Dhir‘endmLMishm, Advocm'e. Heard. The peTi'rioner in s pe‘ri‘rion hds refir'ed from Service. He is ye1' 1'0 receive his re‘h benefits. Due 1’0 non receipf of re'hml beneflfs The pe'rrhoner his dependan‘is are facing greaf financual hardship A prayer ha been made 'l'haf paymenf of reflral benefifs cannoi' be delayed I asmuch as IT Is fhe righf of The pefmoner 1’0 recelve such bene Ifs I? has been sfa‘red a‘r The Bar Time and again fha'r If Is no ra, learned counsel appearing for The Deparfmenf draws my nfioni‘ 'l'o 'rhe documenf’ dafed 29/08/2001 which is said fo be ‘ ‘I'he deparfmen‘l’ for fhe purp unfy and n‘ Is fhe du'ry of fhe compe‘l’enf aufhorrl'y ‘ro pay re' beneflfs One and 'l-he only reason every hme Thai Is placed before fhis Cour‘l’ Is fha'i' the deparfmen‘r is, facmg % financial crunch . ‘ Shri Dhirendra e scheme which has been evolved by of paymenf of reTiral benefi'rs 1’0 The employees who has since re ired The scheme proposes fo make paymenf of Rs.5,000/— fo Th employees of Grade-I and II and Rs.3,000/- To The employees of rude-III and IV per monTh. I i [ms am o i r \d o h l h Mi m'm (War) mmamfvsa WW1%WW aawm If has been ‘ .onfended by The counsel represenhna The Pefmoner fhaf ‘rhe pefmdner should be paid a‘r leasf To begun wrrh a reasonable iump sum. my anxious éonsidemfion for fhe various Affer glvmg since sooner- or laTer The r If of ‘rhe pnrfies I am of ‘l'he opinion Tha‘r reTired employee and alsi caused To The employee benefrfs To him afTer he as reTired from servuce iT Will be JusT fair and reasonable To direcT he respondenT To pay The peTlTioner' a sum of Rs 25 000/- wuThin Tw monThs from The daTe of receipT of This order paymenT sTmcTly In accord ince WITh The scheme ThaT has been placed before Thls CourT unTil Tl cordance WiTh The dil~ecTion of Thls CourT shall be adJusTed observaTions, This WiTh The above direcTions and On failure To pay The money as direcTed above WiThm The sTipulaTe'd Tlme The peTmoner shall sTand enTITled To The paymenT of InTeresT aT The raTe of 18% per annum LeT The com )llance reporT be submiTTed before This submusslons made on beha espondenT musT pay whaTever is due ro Tre i 3 Taking mTo consideraTion The hardships n The absence of paymenT of any r'eTiraI ie lasT paisa Is WhaTever amounT l has been paIdAWac peTiTion is disposed of ThereafTer I dil‘ecT ThaT The respondenTs shall make RegisTry. CerTified copy of This order be supplied as per rules. l’ Sdl- GRPRJLFSG 1 1 50:300. , l l l I: Chief Justice