IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6807 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 20, 2011 Yogesh Kumar & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.S.K.Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners have not laid down any ground to challenge the action of the respondents in not calling them for interview. They, however, have made general allegations to say that transparency is not being maintained and the merit list of the respective categories is not being disclosed. The petitioners have more efficacious remedy to approach the authorities under Right to Information Act to get this information. In fact, the petitioners have already made an application, but still the information is not being supplied. The petitioners can further invoke the remedy provided under the Act and then again approach this court in case they still find that there is some cause or a reason for not short-listing them for interview. Dismissed at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition after obtaining the information under the Right to Information Act. September 20, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE