IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4680 of 2005 BISHESHWAR PASWAN, son of late Gulab Paswan, resident of Village – Labhgaun, P.O. Labhgaun, P.s. Khagaria, District- Khagaria. …………………. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Collector, Khagaria. 4. The D D C, Khagaria. 5. The B D O, Allouli, Khagaria. …………………. Respondents ----------- 04. 05.02.2009 Petitioner had initially filed a writ application which was CWJC No. 2212 of 2004 for payment of retiral dues. The matter was heard and disposed of by order dated 31.8.2004 giving direction for payment. Petitioner has himself brought on record annexure-3 which is a chart filed by the respondent authorities in CWJC No. 2212 of 2004 where details of the outstanding dues and payments have been indicated. The chart also indicated that a sum of Rs.1,16,000 was recoverable from the petitioner but the petitioner did not raise any serious objection when the writ application was disposed of under this head. Now he is back again by filing fresh writ application making a grievance of such deduction. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent State authorities and their stand is not known to the court despite the writ application pending consideration since 2005. When the chart was filed before this Court in the earlier writ application the Court is of the opinion that the same must have been done based on some records available with the respondents. It is also not known whether any order was passed for recovery of these advances which - 2 - were outstanding against the petitioner. In that view of the matter direction is issued upon the B.D.O., Allouli, in the district of Khagaria that he shall forward details of the so-called outstanding dues remaining against the petitioner and the basis on which the said deductions are being claimed. Details must be forwarded to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date communication/production of a copy of this order. If such a communication does not satisfy the petitioner has liberty to revert to the Court by challenging such decision for deduction. The writ application is disposed of with the above direction. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)