IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8711 of 2009 PRAMOD JAISAWAL, son of Parmeshwar Jaiswal, resident of village-Dahawa, P.S.-Dhanaha, District-West Champaran ---------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the victim is the real witness to state the occurrence though she states about leaving the house due to forceful act of Vinod Khuswaha, Singhashan Chaudhary and this petitioner but articles( of her clothes and ornaments) carried by her keeping in a box leads to doubt her consent in leaving the house. Even then it was co-accused Vinod Kushwaha and Singhashan Chaudhary with whom she went to Panipat and remained there for two months and thereafter, she could be brought back. For petitioner it is said that he was even returned to the Barat where victim’s husband and elder brother-in-law had gone. In the facts and circumstances stated above, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Dhanaha P.S. case no.101 of 2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha , West Champaran, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )