/ wammmw (65’ * - @ Ca} 7-a'b7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [c.GJ writ Petition (c) NOV-(b O [2011 PETITIONERS Laxmi Prasad Dansena, S/o /r: Horilal Dansena, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Post Omce Singhitrai, Khasra No. 457/1, Patwari Halka No. 1, Tehsil Dabra, Distn'ct Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Nanhu Ram S/o Mqva Ram, aged about 6O years, R/o Singhju'ai Tarai, Tehsil Dabra, District Janjg‘r—Champa (C.G.) Budhwari Bai W/o Baratram, aged about 46 years, R/o Singhitrai Tarai, Tehsil Dabra, District Janjg‘r—Champa (C.G.) Ghaurilal Dansaine S/o Lekhram Dansaine, aged about 50 years, R/o Singhitrai, Tehsil Dabra, District Janjg‘r-Champa (C.G.) Navlal S/o Balmukund, aged about 49 years, R/o Singhitrai, Tehsil Dabra, District Janjgir« Champa(C.G.) Shobhitram S/o Madhav Lal, aged about 45 years, R/o Singhitraj, Tehsil Dabra, District Janjg'r—Champa (C.G.) 7. Dalapram, S/o Mohitram, aged about 60 years, R/o Singhitraj, r? Tehsil Dabra, District Janjg'r- Champa(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of Public Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Shakti, Sub Division Shaku', District Janjr— Champa (C.G.) / g’ 3. Executive Engineer, Department / of public Works, Shaka, Sub Division Shakti, District Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) 4. Sub Division Offlcer, Shaku', /" District Janjg’r-Champa WRIT E N DER 2 27 FTHE W TIT TI N FINDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHA‘I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR 1 WRIT PETITION (CLNO. 1280 ofZOll WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for the ‘ State/respondents. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 15 “day of June, 2O 1 1) At Ihe vely outset, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that there shall be no demolition of the pi‘opeity in dispute till a fresh demarcation is done atter attbrding proper opportunity ofhearing to the petitioners as well as , other concerned persons. In View of the above submission, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudieation at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed 01': No order asto costs. Amit Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge Present: 1. Q PETITIONER Laxmi Prasad Dansena & Others. ' VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others.