IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.R. No.2007 of 2011 Date of Decision:16.05.2011 Amrik Singh and another .....Petitioners Vs. Nazar Singh .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present:- Mr. R.K. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the respondent. **** SABINA, J.(Oral) Nazar Singh – respondent filed a suit for mandatory injunction directing defendants- petitioners to remove and demolish the wall marked AB in the site plan bearing Khasra No.423 (3K-8M). Thereafter, Nazar Singh – respondent filed another suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from raising any construction over the portion shown in red colour in the site plan bearing khasra No.423 (3K-8M). An application was moved by the petitioners before the trial Court for clubbing both the cases. Vide impugned order, the said application was dismissed by the trial Court. Hence, the present petition. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. Respondent has filed two suits qua the same property against the petitioners. In one suit, respondent is seeking mandatory injunction qua removal of wall marked AB in the site plan bearing Khasra No.423 whereas in the other suit, responent is seeking a direction that the petitioners be C.R. No.2007 of 2011 -2- restrained from raising further construction in the portion shown in red colour in the site plan bearing Khasra No.423 (3K-8M). Since the parties are the same, and the disputed property is also the same, it would be just and expedient in case both the suits are clubbed and decided vide one judgment to avoid any conflicted decisions. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Both the suits filed by respondent i.e. Civil Suit No.359 dated 21.8.2004 and Civil Suit No.648 dated 4.8.2004 titled Nazar Singh v. Amrik Singh and another, are ordered to be clubbed and be disposed of by a common judgment. May 16, 2011 ( SABINA ) renu JUDGE