IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25015 of 2008 1. MANOJ SHARMA @ MANOJ KUMAR 2. CHANDESHWAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 18.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for petitioner no. 1 and the State as also for the complainant. The petitioner, who is the husband, apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections 406, 498 A of the Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner has filed a divorce case earlier in point of time whereafter the present allegations have been made. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that she desires revival of matrimonial harmony and if the petitioner does not reciprocate his application for anticipatory bail may be rejected. Considering the earlier institution of the divorce case by the petitioner no. 1, let him surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur in complaint case no. 1336 of 2007. The desire for revival of matrimonial harmony by the complainant is an aspect to be appropriately kept in mind both in divorce matter as also in the trial. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)