IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11777 of 2008. Decided on: 28.07.2011. ___________________________________________ Ravinder Kumar Sharma and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Surinder Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.7 and 12. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that in view of the law laid down by 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - this Court in S.S. Kutlehria and others versus State of H.P. and others, 2010(1) Shim. LC 513, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 28, 2011. (sck).