lkx ID) §;\ annonmnnnnomnoooomnnn macw“aanoooouwuwuuow n‘mnovnonnnnnnnm‘ uannrmomvmmmm M‘nnnnoo muaoon IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATUKE AT BIL$SPUR<CHE§TTIS GARH) ‘mr uniam pETITION NO. 4%?5" 013‘ 2003 Mohamed Karim,son of Ismail,agec3 ut 36 years, Werkinv as Mechanical lper Category,III, (E & M),'CHP, Kusmunda,S;¢E.C°L°,re3ident of Village Puchela,P.O.Bhairotal,Police Station K uSmunda, Tehsil—Ka tg'hora ,Dis tri ct~ Korba, (C.G. ).‘ US Scuth Eastern CQalfields L- ., through at Chief Bilaslaué;Dis£rict ManaC;no Director,He¢d Bilasgur, Quarter (C.G.) Chief General Manager, S~.E.C.L., KuSmunda Project,Dis trict—Korba, (C.G., ) Deputy General Manager, KuSmunda Projectmietri ct-Korba , (C.G. ) Deputy Chief Works Manager, S..,F‘.C.L. Kusmuhda Area,Kusmunda, DistrictwKorba, (C.G. > Manager,IVIines , Si .E’. c. L, Kusmunda Project, Dis trict-Korba, (C.G9 ) Collector, Korba , Dis tri ct-Korba I C. G. ) / ‘/ v 9r pETiTTON UNDER ARTICLm 225/227 OF THE nu— / ¢q CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA. / e o / XI-HC-22 WWW m?wot81g;/?2§g§ order of thé.‘ respoudeuts bV WI issu€d to thg petitioner 0n 24,!0‘ been instituted agamsi him. Tlm petitioner’s casc is Lha Helpm‘, CatEgOIV-H in Kusmm paritionar’s appom‘tmfrnt was Categoxy against the land acq appointment was made as bein owner ismail. Now, on account ‘ brother of th€ petitionsn $01116 61 the petitioner to ascertam the petitioner Gbtained the service on to the respondents. Therefore, the Learned counsel for the submissions cguid not noint oi Departmental Enquiiv since t1 petitioner that he obtained the information and that is being enquired into by the respondents. There is no allegation in the 1ich the Charge—sheet has been 3/ 2063 and regular enquiry has it he is working as a Mechanical 1da Project 01" S.E.C.,L-. The made as a General Mazdoor uired by the Project and his g nominated candidate of land 0f a complaint lodged by the Lquiry has been initiated against correctness as to Whether the a false ifnformation given by him Lt enquny/ be stayed. petitioner while making his it any reasons for staying the xere is allegation against the job on the basis of a false petition that enquny is being conducted in violation of the Rules or without following the tirocedure as prescribed bv the R justice are being violated. \ ales or the prn‘iciples of natural \ ante m W W m size enter met area Wm 13 heal ream? A $ 31W am €31 f0?; 2003 Shii B,D. Guru. counsel for the netitionei‘. Heard. Bf»? this writ petition the. petitioner seeks to challenge the mw Ww WW f€Q3W ‘E’rTWam q not fmd my Substance in this writ ble to be In View of the above, I do petition a11d Hm same is 1i€ accordingly dismissEd. Cousm‘ ad—mtmim muef and LA. N056 difa‘posed of, dismiSSGd and it i$ gently, 1\/LW.P.N0. 1695/2003 for [5/ 2003 for urgent hearing stand ‘ 1 Sd/- 1 L.C.BHADOO Judge i