1 15711 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 157 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 5287 OF 2011 Shashi Leekha ...Applicant V/s. Sheila Leekha ...Respondent Mr. Uday Warunjikar for the Applicant None for the Respondent CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND R.Y. GANOO, JJ. DATE: 29TH JUNE, 2011 P.C.:- This matter is not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board. 2. It appears that no appearance has been entered on behalf of the respondent. Application No. 40 of 2011 was dismissed for default yesterday, the 28th inst. The counsel for the applicant submits that he made attempt to serve the advocate for the respondent, who had made 2 15711 enquiries about the matter, and stated that he would appear for the respondent. However, the said advocate is not contactable. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, in the interest of justice, this application is allowed, the order passed in Civil Application No. 40 of 2011 dated 28th June, 2011 is recalled and the said Civil Application is restored to the file. The said Civil Application be listed tomorrow, the 30 th inst . R.Y. GANOO, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.