IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 19389 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUNITHAKUMARI, W/O.PRAMOD, AGED 33, CHEURKARAYIL HOUSE, PIRAVOM P.O., PAZHOOR EAST. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, PIRAVAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PIRAVOM P.O. 2. SABU CHERIAN, S/O.CHERIAN, PANNATHUKATTIL, MULAMTHURUTHY VILLAGE. 3. M.V.VARGHESE, MALIAKKAL HOUSE, PAZHUR EAST, PIRAVOM P.O. 4. RAJENDRAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN), THEKKEMALAYIL HOUSE, NEW BAZAR, PIRAVOM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R2-3 BY ADV. SRI.A.S.SAJUSH PAUL FOR R2-3 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS JAMES MUNDACKAL FOR R2-3 BY ADV. SRI.BOBBY THOMAS FOR R2-3 BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19389 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 submit that the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 have settled their disputes and differences out of court and that the petitioner has consented to the fourth respondent constructing a building in his land without leaving open side on the southern and western sides. It is also stated that the fourth respondent has likewise given consent to the petitioner to put a building in the petitioner's property without leaving open space on the northern and eastern sides. A memo dated 27.8.2010 has been jointly filed by the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. In such circumstances, in view of the memo dated 27.8.2010, the writ petition is dismissed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. nj.