IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31123 of 2010(M) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ PERINTHALMANNA TALUK RURAL HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.NO.270, P.O.PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DT., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.C.D.DILEEP RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MALAPPURAM POST, MALAPPURAM-673 001. 2. SANKARANARAYANAN, S/O.RAMAN EZHUTHACHAN, MELITTIL HOUSE, P.O.ELAD, MALAPPURAM DT.,PIN-679 340. 3. LEELA, W/O.SANKARANARAYANAN, S/O.RAMAN EZHUTHACHAN, MELITTIL HOUSE, P.O.ELAD, MALAPPURAM DT., PIN-679 340. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 31123 of 2010 M ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P2, an order passed by the first respondent, allowing a complaint filed by respondents 2 and 3. Against this order, petitioner has an alternate remedy of appeal before the State Commission. For that reason itself, this writ petition does not deserve to be entertained. 2. For the aforesaid reason, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the alternate remedy of appeal before the State Commission, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks