IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH APRIL 2010 / 10TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14047 of 2010(E) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ TOWN BRETHREN ASSEMBLY,ANGAMALY REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES MR.E.M.POULOSE, EDACHERIL HOUSE,NEAR SUB-REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, ANGAMALY-683 572 AND K.V.VARGHESE KOORANPLANKUDY HOUSE,KALLUPALOM ROAD,ANGAMALY-683 572. BY ADVS. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN, SMT.ANJU P.NAIR. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,DEPARTMENT OF TAXES,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE,ALUVA. 6. HOTEL PALACE INN,ANGAMALY,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,MR.HENISH.P.V, S/O.P.V.VARGHESE,PYNADATH HOUSE,NAYATHODE.PO, ANGAMALY-683 572. R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.SANILKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN,J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.14047 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 30th April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is that pursuant to Ext.P9 judgment of this Court, though the 1st respondent has heard the petitioner on 24.3.2010, the matter has been posted for hearing the other side on another day. Therefore, the petitioner has filed Ext.P11 requesting that both the parties be heard on the same day. But no orders have been passed by the 1st respondent thereon, till date. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to conduct the hearing, as directed in Ex.P9 judgment, by hearing the petitioner as well as the 6th respondent together, on the same day, so that the petitioner gets a chance to listen the contentions of the opposite parties and to reply to such contentions effectively. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE ma 2 3