IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.968 of 2007 1. RAM SEWAK PASWAN, SON OF LATE BABULAL PASWAN. 2. SARYUG PASWAN, SON OF LATE BABULAL PASWAN. 3. BIJAY PASWAN, SON OF LATE BABULAL PASWAN. ALL ARE THE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BANDAR BAGICHA, P.S. KAHALGAON, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. ……………(DEFENDANT 2ND PARTY IN THE COURT BELOW) PETITIONERS. Versus 1. SHANKAR CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE CHEDI CHAUDHARY. 2. SHAMBHU CHAUDHARY, SON OF LATE CHEDDI CHAUDHARY. BOTH ARE THE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAAHALGAON, P.S. KAHALGAON, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. ………..(PLAINTIFF IN THE COURT BELOW) O.P. 1ST SET. 3. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. …………………………………………(DEFENDANT 1ST SET). ……………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate. --------- 3. 22.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This Revision is directed against the order dated 10.4.2007 pased in Title Suit No.118/87 by Munsif-I, Bhagalpur, whereby the prayer of the plaintiffs for amendment of plaint has been allowed. It has been submitted on behalf of the defendant- petitioner that the amendment was allowed at the belated stage 2 and the same being not formal, would change the nature of the suit. The court concerned after consideration of the rival submissions of the parties had come to a conclusion that the proposed amendment is only for the purpose of further explaining the earlier stand taken and, thus, the same is not going to change the nature of the suit concerned. However, since it was filed after much delay, the amendment has been allowed subject to the payment of cost of Rs.500/- This Court does not find any jurisdictional error committed by the court below in passing the impugned order. This Civil Revision is, accordingly, dismissed. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)