CWP No.15807 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.15807 of 2010 Date of Decision: 06.09.2010 **** Navneet Singla . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Haryana and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Arun Singal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 03.08.2010 (Annexure P1) passed by the District Registrar of Firms and Societies, Panipat, whereby, proceedings of meeting of the Governing Body of the Arya Girls Public Schools, Panipat allegedly held on 26.06.2010 followed by the election of the Office- bearers of the Management on 27.07.2010, have been cancelled on the ground that the proceedings of the alleged meetings are signed by none of the members who claimed to have attended the same. (2). The petitioner, on the other hand, claims that the meetings were held by following the past practice. CWP No.15807 of 2010.doc - 2 – (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. (4). In my considered view, the pure questions of facts like – (i) Who are the members of the Governing Body? (ii) Whether they were present or not? (iii) Why didn’t they sign the proceedings? and (iv) What was the past practice? etc. cannot be resolved by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, especially when the petitioner has brought on record very selective information. (5). The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach an appropriate forum, if so advised. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 06.09.2010 vishal shonkar