IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17982 of 2011 Ram Pati Ram son of Shri Musafir Ram, resident of village-Pithiyanva, P.S.-Chenari, District-Rohtas. ……… petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, General administration Department, Patna Bihar. 2. The Commissioner4, Patna Division, Patna at and P.O.Patna, District-Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at and P.O. Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 4. The Additional Collector, Land Reforms, Senior In charge, District Establishment Section Rohtas Collect orate, and P.O.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 5. The Establishment Deputy Collector Rohtas Collectorate at and P.O. Sasaram District- Rohtas. 7. The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Rohtas at and P.O. Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 8. The Sub-divisional Officer Dehri District- Rohtas ……………….. Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2 14.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to G.A.-3. The petitioner has moved this Court for a direction to absorb his services in regular establishment on class IV post on which he has been working since 20.5.1993 in the office of respondent no.8. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to various documents showing that he has been working regularly as a daily wage employee in the Zila Nazarat Sub-divisional Office, Dehri,Rohtas at Sasaram pursuant to the recommendation under letter No. 285 dated 8.3.2010 alongwith the enquiry report of the respondent No. 8, the Sub- divisional Officer, sent to the respondent No. 4, the Additional Collector, Land Reforms, recommending absorption of the 2 services of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after that, the respondents have not taken any further steps with regard to such absorption. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to take a final decision with regard to absorbing the service of the petitioner in the regular establishment, as per the recommendation made to that effect. Let the said exercise be completed within eight weeks from the date of production/receipt of this copy of the order upon the respondents no.3 and 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sudha (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)