SGARH AT BELASPUR 3 649 0f20£§3 WRI? EETITION N0. 2 Mukesh Kumar Gupta S/o Banarsi 1’rasad Gupta, age-d about 23 yearS, Rfo Jodhapur Ward Dhamiari, District Dhamiari (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS . Siam of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Deyattment of Commercial taxes (Excisé) D..S. Bhawx, MantraEaya, Raipm‘ (C.G.) 2. Excise Commissioner State of Chha‘aisgarh, Raipur .G.) CoHecor (Licsnsing Amhority) DhamtarL District amtari (CG) 4: Superintenden of Policee Dhamtari, District Dham‘iari (C.G.) District Excise Gfi‘icer, Dhamtari, District am‘tai‘i (C.G.) Ramde Dhiver, aged about 30 vears, S/o Mohan La} Dhivar R/o Baniyapai‘afDhamtari, Disirict Dhamti (CG) THE CONSTITI JTION OF INDIA ’ a . Agnihswi, J. ?resent Shri Ji‘iendra ?a1i, Advecate for the yetitioner. Shm' M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govermnent Advocate for the State. Shri Aziand adariya, Advocate for {he respondent No. 6. p... DJ UK \ O GREER ORAL) " (Passed on 06 dayof August, 2009) T. Leamed counsel appearing for e petitioner, on instmctioxis, submits th that with the passage oftime, this petition has become infructuous. 2. eamed cotmsel appearing for other side have no objection. L 3. It is ordered accordingiy. 4. Coasequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become inhuctuous. M(W)P No. 2429/2003, is also dismissed. #rerx sw- ii i saesh K Judge Agnihm ‘ . HEGH COURT GF CHHATTI PETITIONER RESPONDENTS K ar t (C Dh t h o PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF ar S : Henhie Shri Sfish K D