1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1528 OF 2010 (Anil Nilkanth Dhumna and another .v. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri C.V. Sakhare, Advocate for the applicants. Shri M.J. Khan, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 21ST OCTOBER, 2010. Heard. By way of present application, the applicants are seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No. 183/2010 registered with the Police Station, Bhadrawati for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that applicant No.1 is falsely involved in the matter. Reply is filed by the State. I have perused the record. It is clear from the record and reply that there is enough material to connect applicant No.1 and to show his involvement. The offence is serious in nature. The applicant No.1 by using fabricated document posing himself as his father, has committed crime. In view of the material placed on record by the investigating agency, I am of the opinion that no case is made out to grant any protection to applicant No.1. The material also indicates that the custodial interrogation of applicant No.1 is necessary in the matter by the investigating agency to proceed further in the investigation in view of the fact that some of the accused are absconding and major role is played by applicant No. 1. Insofar as applicant No.2 is concerned, the only material alleged against her that applicant No.2 is accompanying applicant No.1 and she was aware of the intention of applicant No.1. 2 Learned APP submits that applicant No.2 is involved in certain offences to cheat general public. There is no record produced by the learned APP to show that any offence is registered or any criminal proceeding is initiated against her. In view of the fact that applicant No.2 being a woman and no material is produced to show that any custodial interrogation of applicant No.2 is necessary by the investigating agency, I am of the opinion that prima facie case is made out for granting protection to applicant No.2. In the result, application is partly allowed. Application in respect of applicant No.1 is rejected. Application in respect of applicant No.2 is allowed. The applicant No.2 be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount, on the following conditions. (i) The applicant No.2 to cooperate with the investigating agency and attend the Police Station, Bhadrawati on every 2nd and 4th Sunday between 09:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon for three months. (ii) The applicant No.2 shall not tamper with the evidence nor commit any act such as contacting the prosecution witnesses or pressurize them. (iii) The applicant No.2 to submit her residential address and her contact numbers such as phone/mobile numbers to the investigating agency. (iv) In case the applicant No.2 is moving out of the area of Police Station, Bhadrawati, she shall inform the Police Station about his visit to other place. In case of breach of these conditions, the prosecution agency to take necessary steps in accordance with the provisions of law. JUDGE *rrg.