1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.(MD)No.619 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Sivaram Girls High School, Rep. by its Secretary, Mamsapuram, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. : Appellant/Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6. 2.The Director of Government Examination, Directorate of School Examination, College Road, Chennai-6. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Regional Deputy Director, Government Examinations, Office of the Regional Deputy Director, Madurai-5. 5.The District Educational Officer, Virudhunagar. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order passed by this Court dated 23.06.2011 made in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 in W.P.(MD)No2878 of 2011. WP(MD) No.2878/2011 : Prayer : Petition praying that in the circumstances stated there in and in the affidavit filed there with the High Court will be pleased to grant Interim Direction, directing the 2nd and 4th Respondents herein to include in to the list the names of the 17 boy students studying in STD X in petitioner's School herein and permit them to appear for the S.S.L.C. Examinations to be held on 28.03.2011. For Appellant : Mr.P.Mahendran For Respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.] This Writ Appeal arises out of the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 23.06.2011 made in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 in W.P.(MD) No.2878 of 2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Since the relief sought for in the interlocutory application filed by the appellant in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 is beyond the scope of the Writ Petition itself, we do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. . 3. Considering the said fact and coupled with the further fact that the Writ Petition itself has been directed to be posted for final hearing, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. However, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is permitted to make a mention before the learned Single Judge concerned for hearing the Writ Petition at the earliest. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6. 2.The Director of Government Examination, Directorate of School Examination, College Road, Chennai-6. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Regional Deputy Director, Government Examinations, Office of the Regional Deputy Director, Madurai-5. 5.The District Educational Officer, Virudhunagar. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.22341 Sml SR : 19.07.2011 : 2p/7c Judgment made in W.A.(MD)No.619 of 2011 Dated:- 08.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/