1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2134/2008. Amarjeet Singh. VERSUS State of Rajasthan and Others. 03.07.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.K.K.Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr.R.B.Mathur, for the respondents. ***** During the course of hearing, it has been brought to the notice of the court that the application submitted by the petitioner for renewal of the license in respect of IMFL/Beer has been decided by the respondents and rejected. The said order is said to be dated 25.02.2008. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid order has been antedated and the action of the respondents is malafide as it was never served upon the petitioner. It was in these circumstances that the petitioner approached this court for the relief as prayed for that the respondents cannot treat a vacancy and ask for the applications in respect of the grant of license in respect of the shop of the petitioner. I am of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the petitioner cannot succeed without challenge to the order of rejection passed by the respondents dated 25.02.2008. Since this fact has been brought to the notice of the court 2 along with the reply and the order had not been served upon the petitioners, as alleged, the said fact cannot be lost sight of. In the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to dismiss this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has alternative remedy of preferring an appeal against the order dated 25.02.2008 of rejection of his application. Having said so, it is further directed that in case the petitioner files an appeal against the order dated 25.02.2008, the petitioner would be entitled to seek condonation of delay in respect of the same on account of the pendency of this writ petition. Subject to the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.