1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6836 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1950 OF 2009 Chiragi Ashish Ved .. Petitioner. Vs. Ashish Mahendra Ved .. Respondent. Mr.V. Mishra for the petitioner. Mrs.B.Jadhav for the respondent. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 17TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents waives service. The petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. This writ petition impugns the order dated 21.4.2009 passed by the Family Court rejecting an application filed by the petitioner-wife seeking issuance of the witness summons. I have perused the impugned order and the other material placed before the court. It is true that the petitioner-wife could have applied for issuance of the witness summons on 9.4.2009. The reasons stated in the application are also not sufficient. 2 However, in the interest of justice and in order to give one more opportunity to the petitioner I pass the following order: The order dated 21.4.2009 is set aside. The Family Court shall issue witness summons, as prayed, within a period of ten days from today. The hearing of petition No.A-1177 of 2006 is expedited. The parties are directed to co-operate for early disposal of the petition. With these observations the Rule is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the civil application is also disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)