THE HONOURABLE Smt. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No4815 of 2009 ORDER: This revision petition filed by the petitioner-3rd defendant is directed against the order of the IX Additional Senior Civil Judge, (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No. 142 of 2009 in I.A. No. 69 of 2009 in O.S. No. 2142 of 2005, dated 12.8.2009 whereby and whereunder the I.A. filed by the 1st respondent-plaintiff for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was allowed. The 1st respondent-plaintiff filed the aforementioned I.A. under Order 26 Rule 9 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., before the Court below seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features and the stage of the construction of the petition schedule property. Through the order impugned in this revision, the Court below allowed the said I.A. and appointed a Commissioner. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner, who is the 3rd defendant filed the present revision. When the revision petition has come up for hearing, learned counsel for the 1st respondent-plaintiff has submitted that the Advocate Commissioner, who was appointed in pursuance of the impugned order of the Court below had conducted local inspection and submitted her report before the Court below. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the 1st respondent, no further orders are necessary in this revision petition and the revision petition is accordingly disposed of. The Court below is however directed to dispose of the suit, namely, O.S. No. 2142 of 2005, which is pending on its file as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J DATE: 20th November, 2009 pnb