THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B CHANDRA KUMAR WPMP No. 42911 of 2010 And Writ Petition No. 10351 of 2004 DT. 19.1.2011 Between: Ramchandra Reddy and ors … Petitioner And The Spl. Court under A P Land Grabbing (P) Act, Hyd and ors … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B Mahender Reddy Counsel for respondent no.1 : Counsel for respondents 2 to 4: Mr Harender Prasad The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B CHANDRA KUMAR WPMP No. 42911 of 2010 And Writ Petition No. 10351 of 2004 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V Eswaraiah) Mr Ramakrishna Reddy, learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioners submits that the writ petition is not pressed as against respondents 5 to 15 and he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as against them. Permission accorded and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed as against respondents 5 to 15 herein, who are respondents in LGC cases before the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad. The petitioners herein are third parties to the LGC cases before the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad which were disposed of by common order in L.G.C. Nos. 124 of 1997, 47 and 48 of 1998 dated 31.3.2004. The second respondent herein filed LGC No. 124 of 1997, the third respondent herein filed LGC No. 47 of 1998 and the fourth respondent herein filed LGC No. 48 of 1998. The said three Land Grabbing cases were allowed declaring that the respondents therein are the land grabbers and they are directed to vacate the application schedule property and deliver the vacant possession of the same to the respective applicants therein. Aggrieved by the said orders dated 31.3.2004, the petitioners herein claiming title, filed the present writ petition after obtaining leave of this Court. It is stated by learned counsel for petitioners that both the writ petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4 herein have came to an understanding and settled the matter amicably and accordingly entered into a compromise, which is filed along with WPMP No. 42911 of 2010 filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, to record the compromise and close the writ petition in terms of the said compromise. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and Mr Harender Prasad for respondents 2 to 4 herein. We are not inclined to express any opinion with regard to the right, title and interest of the parties herein who are in compromise, as against the interest of the Government and any other third parties or even parties to the Land Grabbing case proceedings. In the result, the W.P.M.P. No. 42911 of 2010 is ordered and writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise insofar as writ petitioners and respondents 1 to 4 are concerned. Whereas writ petition insofar as respondents 5 to 15 stands dismissed as not pressed. No costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH,J _________________ B CHANDRA KUMAR,J DATE: 19.1.2011 TVK THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B CHANDRA KUMAR WPMP No. 42911 of 2010 And Writ Petition No. 10351 of 2004 DT. 19.1.2011