IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13528 of 2007 Rajendra Singh Yadav, son of Sri Shital Das Yadav, resident of Village Dani Bigha, P.s. Shekhpura, Dist. Shekhpura (Munger), at present posted as acting Head Master, Middle School, Aliganj, Jamui, Dist. Jamui. --------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Munger. 5. The Area Education Extension Officer, Sikandra, Block-Sikandra, Dist. Jamui. ------- Respondents ----------- 2 18.11.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner as with regard to being granted the benefit of Second Time Bound Promotion stands fully answered in the impugned order wherein it has been stated that the petitioner was appointed on stipend on 17.10.1973 as an I. Sc. Trained Teacher whereafter on 1.4.1975 he was granted the pay-scale of I.Sc. Trained Teacher. It has further been recorded that the petitioner was granted promotion to B.Sc. Trained Scale with effect from 17.3.1980 and upon completion of twelve years, the petitioner was also granted the First Time Bound Promotion exclusively for the Teachers with effect from 17.3.1992. 2 These facts specifically recorded in the impugned order dated 31.3.2003 has not been disputed but, the petitioner has proceeded on an assumption that his First Time Bound Promotion should have been given with effect from 17.10.1983 and Second Time Bound Promotion with effect from 17.3.1998 in view of the Government Resolution dated 30.12.1981. Such impression of the petitioner again is wholly misconceived, inasmuch as, a person in terms of the Government Resolution dated 30.12.1981 was eligible to be granted Time Bound Promotion provided he had received no promotion in the span of ten years. Admittedly, the petitioner when he was granted B.Sc. Trained Scale of Pay on 17.3.1980 within seven years of his entry in service could not have been entitled for grant of Time Bound Promotion. Thus his grievance for First Time Bound Promotion with effect from 17.10.1983 is wholly misconceived and must be rejected. Coming to the second grievance as with regard to the grant of Second Time Bound Promotion on completion of twenty-five years service, this Court must record that the Time 3 Bound Promotion Scheme for the Government Servants got abolished with effect from 1.1.1996 and, therefore, the petitioner was not entitled for any Time Bound Promotion with effect from 17.10.1998. In the case of the Teachers, a post which was also held by the petitioner, such Time Bound Promotion Scheme in fact came to be abolished with effect from 1.1.1986 wherein the concept of two promotions at the end of twelve years and fourteen years was introduced. Admittedly, the petitioner, in view of the aforesaid Government Resolution, has already been given promotion upon completion of twelve years of service and as such, the petitioner will now be not entitled for any such promotion unless the Government modifies its existing schemes. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)