c^' ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.GY W.P. fS) N0. SW /1010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^ ^•"'','^-"v,..<'\^ ^y^^ <%>-""/v)< ^^ ^" Mithilesh Kymar Shukla, aged about 64 years, S/o Late Shri Brijlal Prasad Shukla, Retired Upper Division Teacher, R/o Brahamanpara, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) School VERSUS :1<^" State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. C The DJrector, Pubtic Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. * Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Raipur, District P.ajnandQaoR-(C. G. ) 4.' District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District / Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 6. Principal, Sarveshwar Das Nagar Nigam Higher Secondary School, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5. <^": ^ WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OFINDIA 1 ^ ^I^T ^?T Ri'lioh TOT 31I^T »»*<w o ^^ NI*1Cfll (h^<T^» 's^ ^i^id^, yal-M<i<o, f®ldl-y!j,< »»....W,.&.©..^&..:...^.55.?/12. f-;'v"^""""-"--Tr""^-^ 200 ^TI^T TT^R7 (<l°tf^^) 'p^nw^f?^ 3^r SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pritjnker D 29.10.2010: Shri K.S. Pawar counsel foil Shri Ajit Singh PL for the rej Counsel for the petitioner second Kramonnati as per cir| (Annexures P-2 and P-3) after(j submits that the issue involved ir1 considered and decided by this Cc\ <sftHt^i<ili wy^f "^f f^^l <f^i<^i< ^3TRm^?I^T waker the petitioner. spondents/State. >ubmits that the petitioner is entitled to ;ular dated 3.3.2008 and 11.1.2010 ^ompletion of 24 years of service. He the present petition has already been iurt in the matter of R.S.Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh and others (W.P. jNo. 2805/2002) by judgment and order dated 29.8.2006. He further sybrjiits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation t| the light of the judgment passed tj State of Tripura and others v. M passed in R.S. Verma (supra)| > consider the case of the petitioner in ^y the Hon. Apex Court in the matter of .K. Rov (2004 SCW/1) and the order to which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection| Accordingly, liberty sought Ijor by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concern^d authority. In view of above, the petjtion is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge