Sr)iSI •f ^^z5 THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) No. 32-?-c> OF 2009 1. Mesram Dularu Das years, R/o Plari, S/o Late Shri Dhidhi, aged about 44 Village Harijanbhatha, Tahsil .^ ,.•• .^}<^ ".^.•f'A.-"'" <^\^w^w ,^/v ,;,A'.\'l Y/'"' '^%?'r ',^''' ..-•°' ^"' ,-f t;»' ^^•- 4. 5. Gyaneshwar. Prasad.. Pathak, S/o late Shri Salik Ram Pathak, aged about 41 years, Posted'as Assistant Watgan, R/o Odan Watgan, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) Jitendra Kumar V/ishwakarma, S/o late Shri T.R. Vishwakarma, aged Raipur (C.G.) Satish Kumar Vishwakarma, S/o Shri R.P. Vishwakarma, aged about 35 years, R/o goverdhan Nagar, , District Raipur Narayan Prasad Bhardwaj, S/o Late Office i, District @ VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, 2. The District Education Officer, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER T <. •\7- anOT^ilViw W^ 3TI^T «)*ijcti <n*<ni <»»*<i 75T '<LII':il<1'LI, (STll'M'tlo, 'facTOy ,.^./3.r.s).,.2>^2<5.» sn^?l 'v^: (yit^i'i'l) c^flp^ ^f^tl <sr^r Shri Bhaskar Payasi coun^el for the petitioners.' Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for|the respondents/State. ication annua! 1s submits that the petitioners have ihs i.e. on 7.7.2008 and 11.12.200i ilecided. He seeks a direction for ns which Grievance of the petitiojiers Is that they ar Assistant Grade - II in the $chool Educati therefore they are entitied for tw<|) their initiai appoinfment. Counsel for the petitioneit aiready made tv/o representatiof but they have not yet been disposa! of those representatitj respondents/State. Counsel for the respor petitioners make a fresh detailecj this order and the same woil concerned expeditlously. Accordingly, it is dlrect^i representation to the authorltie^ days from the date of receipt (^ concerned shail decide the sat weeks from the date of its receipt *l<ll*f<il-l 'qrojf -if fe<3t <R<<^|< iraiRn sii^i are working as Department and ncrements from the date of erore tne dents/State submlts that let the representation along with a copyof Id be decided by the authorities d that if the petitioners make a concerned within a period of 15 F copy of this order, the authorities Tie within a further period of four F T ::gi^ j . <h- jir jS .,,y^XtflC—78 ^^•^wwi, wxi\-»'w, fqtfiyy -.2- ^ ^W^(F9»tli Sf^tf 'q^i' (ljclfd»l<'?) srft'r'w^fw 'PTSff •3TT^T sR^N? ^ ^wiw •ttfso 3nt?T It is made ciear that no opinij of the case and the authorities co| the sarne stricfiy in accordance witti With the observations and di >ed of. ^T^fcf4h[ "RFT^ ^ fe^ ^R$R ^siRnsii^r 3n has been expressed on merits icerned would be free to decide law. Irections as above, the petition is Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar / Judge