HIGH GOUR‘I‘ OF CHHAT'I‘ISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petitioh [Si No. 5096 of 2008 Ram Kumar Dwivedi, S/o Late Ram Prasad Dwivcdi, Aged about 63 years, R/o. Village: Dogalia, Tahsil : Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Petitioner -‘versus- Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thxough; The Sccrctarf, Departmcnt 0f Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Raipur (CG). 2. The Consctor, Distt‘: Kérba (CG); 3. The Block Education Ofticer, U13mda’ Distt. Kcrha (CG) 4. The Divisionai Joint Director, Treasury, Accountant and Pension Deptt. Bilaspur (CG). 5. The District Treasuxy Qfflcer, Bilaspur (CG) Podi (Writ Petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri N. N. Roy, Advocate for the petitioner. Shrfl Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for he State. t UKAI. umwR (Passed on this 12th day of Seytember. 2008) 1. With consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finany. 2. This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retjral dues. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642_l 2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8r, others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of‘ facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Governm ent of Ch hattisgarh and others), and order dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 {State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by ’7 Thakur F.» 2 / thé judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the oiiice of me Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as well as a copy of the petition uom the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and otiicers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after ahording proper opportunity ofhearing to the petltioner. The petitioner and the oiiicers concerned may tile additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed Within a period of four months from the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel for transferring the same to the Committee. ln case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionary dues, it is not necessary to tile a writ'petition before this Court directly. The representation] application can be moved before the Pension Committee, as stated above. The Pension Committee shall not refuse to entertain the representation] application, if so tiled directly. Sd/- l Satish K. Agnihotrii‘ Judge