d ^ . \-e L-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS .s^. ,^^^\ «^.>/" ^^^•" WRITPETITIQNNO. ^^J?/2004 Smt. Sagni Bai, D/o Shri Peelaram, Aged about 55 years, Post- Daily Wages Employee oflrrigation Department, R/o Villa^e - Mechka, District- Dhamtari, C.G. VERSUS .1. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, M^antralaya Raipur.C.G. 2. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Near Bhagat Sin^i Chowk, Raipur, (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources Departmeiit M.J.P. Dam Sub Divisioa No.l, Mechka District Dhamtari, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA FORISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER WIUTS. DmECTIONS OR ORDERS. r3) OF : PET3T10NER N0. 2876 OF 2004 Smt. Saani Bai Versys State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition under Artjcle 226/227 of the Constltution of Indla) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present:- Shri Ajok Dewangan, counsei for the petitioner. Ms Smita Ghai, Pane! Lav/ysr for the State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on this 16%day ofSeptesiiber, 2009) 1. Vtfith the conssnt of learned counsel appearina for the parties, the petltlon is heard finaliy. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submite that the present case is squarely covered by the decislon of this Court rendered in Govind & Others vs. State of C.G. & Others and, as such, leamed counsel prays that the petltloner be permitted to withdraw this petition with ilberty to a representatlon to the respondent-auth.oritjes, to conslder her case in the light ofthe aforesaid decision. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Stete submits that In the event, the petitloner makes a representation, the same shall be considered and declded, in accordance with law and org its own nierSts, ^s expodltlously as pOsslbie. -: In vlevv of foregolng,- according to the leamed counsel appearlng for the petltioner, nothing syrvives in this petltion for adjydication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dlsposed of. Consequentiy, M.(W.).P.No.2362 of 2004 aiso stands dlsposed of. - 4- 5. <^' (2007) 2 CGL.J 69 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge