>T ns CHHATTiSSARH: BiLASPUR Petitioner WntPetition No. 1800of2S06 Smt. Geeta Yadav, W/o. Shri Tarun Yadav, aged 25 years, President of Greeh Laxmi Swam Sahayata Mahiia Samuh Nichepara, Dharamjajgarh, Tahsii Dharamjaigam, Police Steiion Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (ChhatSisaarh). ResDpndents Versus 1} Siate of Chhattisga; Food Suppiy Raipur (Chhaffisgarh). 2) Coiiector, Raisarh, Dis throuah Secretara. D.K.S. Bhawan, trlct Raigarh 3) Food Officer, Raigarh, Districi Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). 4) S.D.O. Dharamiaisarh. Tahstl Dhararriiaiaarh (Udalpur), District Raigarh (Chhaffisgarh). 5) Manoj Kumar Agravv'ai, son of Shri Kunj-Bihari Agrawal, aged about 40 years, Agrawal by casts President of Maa Ambey Praihmik upbhokaia Bhandar Maryadit Dharamjaigarh, Tahsii' Dharamjaigarh (Udaipur), District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). ,'Writ Petition under Artlcie 226/227 of the Constitution of Sndia) SB: Hon'bis fAr. Satish K. Agnihofri, J. Prssent: Mr. J.S. Baraik, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! La'wyer for the State. o 'D (Passed on this 3Q day of January, 200S) With the consent of Searned counse! appearing for the parties, the ffiatter is heard flnaliy. 2) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the enquiry conducted is not in accordancs v/ith the policy of the State Government. Learned counsei further submits that ths pstltioner has made sevsral representations to the Sub Divisional Officer. Dharamiaiaarh. Dist. Raigarh on 9-8-20)5 (Annexure P/9), 11-5-2005 (Annexure P/10) and to the Collector. - 2 ^ Raiaarh on 1S-5-2005 (Annsxure P/11), but no steps have been taken so far bv ths respondent-authorities on his representations. 3) Be that as it may, without expresslng any oplnion on the merits of She case, if the abovs stated representations ars pending, the respondents No.2/Co!!ector, Raigarh and respondent No.4/Sub Divisionai Officer, Dharamjaigarh, are dirscted to consider the aforesaid rspresentations of the petitioner, in accordance with lav./, or. Its own merits and psss an appropriate order as eariv as oossibie. Dreferabiy, within a osriod of six weeks from the date of receiot of a coov of this order- 4) The petitioner, on his request, is permitied to make a fresh representafion. 'f so advised. 5) in view of the foregoing, this petition is accordlngly disposed cf. Consequentiy, M.W.P.No.1357/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- raju Satish K. Agnihotri Judge //•••