FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2575 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ We heard learned counsel Mr. Khan for the applicant. Copy of this application has been served on respondent No.1, for whom learned counsel Mr. Kazi is before us. Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are represented by learned A.P.P. Notice of this criminal application is accepted by Mr. Kazi, for respondent No.1 and Mr. Shaikh, learned A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Counsel for the applicant took us to para 2 of the criminal application. Mr. Kazi, learned counsel submits that even affidavit in reply to this criminal application is not necessary. He points out the challenge in criminal writ petition No. 598 of 2010 and the order which is impugned in the said petition. According to him, the present applicant has nothing to do with the criminal writ petition No. 598 of 2010. We heard learned A.P.P. Mr. Shaikh for respondent No. 2 to 5. In our opinion, this criminal application does not bear any merit. The subject matter of criminal writ petition No. 598 of 2010 is altogether different. The order/communication is in fact a proclamation issued by the Tahsildar only for cultivation of land for 2010-2011 in dispute. This application is devoid of any merits and stands rejected. We make it clear that we have not observed anything on merits of criminal writ petition No. 598 of 2010. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) Date:06.07.2010. rlj/ FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ We heard learned counsel Mr. S.S. Kazi for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. Mr. Shaikh, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Our order passed on 29.6.2010 is very specific. Learned A.P.P. seeks one weeks time. Mr. Kazi, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance of ante dated order passed by S.D.M.. The grievance is serious. We grant time only till Friday of this week i.e. 09.07.2010. Copies of affidavits, as directed earlier, to be served on the counsel appearing for the petitioner. Liberty in favour of petitioner to place on record documents, if he desires to do so. S.O. to 09.07.2010. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) Date:06.07.2010. rlj/