IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41220 of 2010 JATA SHANKAR SINGH @ JHOTAHABA S/O SATRUGHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated 06.09.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 29650 of 2010 but was given a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in case his trial is not bifurcated. It has been submitted that the petitioner’s case has not been bifurcated and he has been charged along with the other co-accused persons, if it is so, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, Begusarai in connection with S.T. No. 1019/2010 arising out of Begusarai Muffasil (Singhoul O.P.) P.S. Case No. 79/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailors shall be the brother- in-law (Bahanoi) of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )