IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1549 of 2008 JITENDRA KUMAR PANDEY Versus BRIJ BIHARI PANDEY ----------- 4 1.10.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The defendant no.2 and defendant no.3 had filed joint written statement. After defendant no.3 is said to have been dead the issue as to whether heirs of defendant no.3 substituted have been validly served notice on their correct address or not, is not the concern of defendant no.2. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)