1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1912 OF 2005 Shobha Sharad Kamble and anr. ... Petitioners Vs. The Mun. Corpn. for Gr. Mumbai and anr. ... Respondents Mr. H.S.S. Murthy for Petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The construction of the Petitioner has been demolished. In these circumstances, it will not be open for this court to grant relief in terms as prayed for by the Petitioner. The Petitioner will have to follow the process of law and get necessary permission to put up the construction. Even if, he has any case for damages against the Respondents that the construction has been illegally demolished, it will be open to the Petitioners to take such proceedings and disposal of this petition will not stand in his way. Petition stands disposed of. We make it clear that we have not decided the merits of the matter and all issues are left open. 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)