IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7195 of 2011 DAYANAND MALAKAR @ CHHOTU, SON OF LATE YOGENDRA MALAKAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that in course of investigation, some witnesses stated about the involvement of the petitioner but the aforesaid witnesses have specifically stated that they came to know about the name of the petitioner from local people. So, the aforesaid fact clearly indicates that the aforesaid witnesses could not identify the petitioner themselves. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri T.P. Singh, Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Begusarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1192 of 2009 arising out of Teghra P.S. Case No. 54 of 2008. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )