IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32847 of 2010 MD. IBRAN @ BABLOO S/O MD. QAYUM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 22.12.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.395 of the Indian Penal Code AND 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 20.4.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.12149 of 2010 since he was identified by the informant as one of the miscreants. Considering the merits of the case, I am not inclined to review the said order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge to derive benefit of this order. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )