IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.21833 of 2004 Between: M/s. Vishal Seeds Pvt., Ltd. having its regd. Office at 8-2-108/3, Opp : Hasthinapuram North, Sagar Road, Hyderabad - 70, rep by its MD, Sri Viswanatha Reddy ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P., rep by The Commissioner & Directro of Agriculture, Opp : L.B. Stadium, Hyderabad. 2 State Level Committee, Rep by its Chairman & Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp : L.B. Stadium, HYderabad. 3 The District Level MOU Commissioner, Rep by its Chairman & Joint Director of Agriculture, Krishna District. 4 Sri Ginjupalli Apparao, S/o. Pullaiah, Majors, R/o. Gopinenipalem (V) of Vatsavaj Mandal, Krishna District. 5 Sri Mogaparthi Satyanarayana, S/o. Viswanatham, Majors, R/o. Gopinenipalem (V) of Vatsavaj Mandal, Krishna District. 6 Kakani Koteswararao, S/o. Narasimhaiah, Majors, R/o. Gopinenipalem (V) of Vatsavaj Mandal, Krishna District. 7 Ginupalli Venkataramana, S/o. Pullaiah, Majors, R/o. Gopinenipalem (V) of Vatsavaj Mandal, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the 3rd respondent dated 18-3-2004 as made in Roc NO. C3/282/2004 as confirmed by the 2nd respondent in Proceedings No. S&HVP(1)573/Appeals/2003, dt. 14-10-2004 as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the constitution of India besides against to the terms and conditions of the MOU and the instructions issued by the 1st respondent from time to time and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.SESHADRI NAIDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.21833 of 2004 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 13-03-2008, none appeared for the petitioner and as such, the matter has been posted “for dismissal”. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on its behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. However, the interim order granted on 02-12-2004 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 27-03-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}