IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.2187-M of 2011 Date of Decision:25.3.2011 Kushal Pal Singh .... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ashish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Narain Singh States that since the petitioner has since been acquitted by the Court of ACJM, Karnal, on 16.3.2010, the present petition has become infructuouns. In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 25.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE