IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19854 of 2010 SANTOSH YADAV @ SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.6.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S.Case No.04 of 2010 for the offences punishable under sections 376, 493, 341, 323, 504, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The present case arises of a complaint case which has subsequently been registered as police case under the provisions of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the complaint petition which forms part of the first information report, submits that the very fact that the complaint petition has not been signed by the complainant creates doubt about its truthfulness and the allegations set out therein. Learned counsel, with reference to the family genealogy present under paragraph no.9 of the bail application, submits that he and the complainant are cousin brother and sister and the allegation is motivated. He further submits that there is a land dispute betweens the parties and which has given 2 rise to the present case. It is further submitted that whereas the complainant is a married lady aged about 38 years, the petitioner is also married and aged 26 years. He further submits that a bare perusal of the substance of allegation on the face appears false. Taking into consideration the circumstances and the submissions of the learned counsel, let petitioner Santosh Yadav alias Santosh Kumar Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S.Case No.04 of 2010. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)