IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2010 SHRI. VAMAN JANU VELIP ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. PRASAD SHIVAM CHANEKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. V.A. Lawande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 23rd August, 2010 P.C.: Counsel on behalf of both parties present. 2. The petitioner/accused is stated to be in custody. Consent terms duly signed by the parties, as well as their respective Counsel, have been produced. They are taken on record. As per the consent terms, the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.52,000/- and the balance amount is secured by issuing of 5 cheques in the total sum of Rs.50,000/-. The consent terms are accepted. The offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is allowed to be compounded. Consequently, the judgments of both the Courts below are hereby set aside and the accused acquitted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Criminal Revision Application No.30/2010 is accordingly disposed of. 3. In view of the acquittal, the petitioner/accused be ordered to be released from the jail. Expedite authenticated copy. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH