FAO No. 4347 of 2002 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 4347 of 2002 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.2.2011 Tarlochan Kumar .. Appellant v. Bala Rani and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Y. S. Turka, Advocate for the respondents. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment and decree dated 16.1.2002, passed by the learned court below, whereby the application filed by the appellant seeking custody of his son-Rahul was dismissed. After the death of the wife of the appellant, the minor child is living with his maternal grand parents. The date of birth of the child is 27.6.1996. He is more than 14 years of age. He was called in person in court. The appellant is also present in person in court. The appellant had a meeting with the minor child, who refused to live with the appellant. Considering this aspect, the only prayer made by the appellant was that he be given some visiting rights. The minor child was put this question. He said that he is not willing to meet the father. However, he volunteered that he can talk to him on telephone. The mobile number of the maternal uncle of the child has been given to the appellant. Initially, the appellant may talk to the child once in a month, however, later on if the child agrees, the frequency can be increased. They can also mutually settle regarding any meeting or the place thereof. FAO No. 4347 of 2002 [2] With the aforesaid understanding between the parties, the present appeal is disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge 14.2.2011 mk