IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP.No. 2005 of 2009. Date of Decision: 24.8.2010. _______________________________________________ Poonam Rana. ….Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others. ….Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Lovneesh Kumar, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 5. :Mr. Ramesh Thakur,Asstt. Advocate General. For Rerspondent No.6. Mr.Vikram Thakur, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). It is undisputed before me that this case is covered by the decision of a Division bench of this Court in CWP. No. 525 of 2009 titled Ravinder Singh Vs. State of H.P. and others decided on 4th August, 2009 and CWP. No. 2850 of 2010 titled Rani Devi Vs. State of H.P. and others decided on 1st June, 2010. Copy of the decisions of both the cases is placed on the record of the case. Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?yes . 2 After hearing the learned counsel for parties, it is directed that the orders (Annexure:P2 and P3) passed by the Deputy Commissioner are quashed and set aside. The criteria laid down by the Committee cannot be applied retrospectively. It is further directed that the Committee shall grant adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as to respondent No. 7 and decide the matter fresh in accordance with law. The committee while deciding the issue will take into consideration the law laid down by this Court in the two writ petitions as aforesaid. The petitioner will be allowed to continue as Drawing Teacher in Government Middle School, Kiard, District Solan till the inquiry is completed in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. August 24, 2010(R)