IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11152 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF JANARDHAN MISHRA, RESIDENT OF AT + P.O. CHAKHABELI, POLICE STATION BHIBHUTIPUR DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR AT PRESENT TREASURER, OF THE STUDENTS UNION OF GAUTAM BUDHA TEACHER TRAINING COLLEGE, SAMASTIPUR---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION NEW SECRETARY, PATNA. 2. DIRECTOR, RESEARCH AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SINHA LIBRARY ROAD, PATNA. 4. SECRETARY, GAUTAM BUDHA PRIMARY TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, SAMASTIPUR---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 01.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the Treasurer of the Students Union of Gautam Budha Teachers Training College, Samastipur(hereinafter referred to as “the College”). He has filed this writ application for a direction to the Bihar School Examination Board(hereinafter referred to as “the Board”) to publish the result of the students of the College for Primary Teachers Training Examination for the Sessions 1986-88, 1987-89 and 1988-90. It appears from the pleadings made in the writ application that the College had no recognition for the sessions 1986- 88, 1987-89 and 1988-90 from the authorities of the State Government as was required in terms of the instructions prevailing then. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in spite of deposit of the inspection fee and other documents, at the relevant time the authorities of the State Government did not take any steps to constitute the inspection team as also to consider the recognition matter of the College and for the latches on the part of the authorities of the State Government to constitute the inspection team to conduct the inspection of the College as also to consider the recognition matter - 2 - of the College, the students who have appeared in the examination conducted by the Board for the Sessions 1986-88, 1987-89 and 1988- 90 should not be allowed to suffer. 4. From Paragraph-1 of the writ application, it appears that the students of the College appeared in the examination held in the month of January, 1991 but the present application has been filed on 28.8.2009, in the circumstances, on the ground of latches on the part of the petitioner to agitate the matter after delay of more than 18 years, I am not inclined to consider the prayer made in the writ case and the writ application is dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)