:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.943 OF 2007 Sunil Boricha .. Petitioner. Vs. The Dy.Registrar & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.A.S.Desai for the petitioner. Ms.Mamta Sadh AGP for respondent nos.1, 4, 5 & 6. Mr.Prashant Naik for respondent no.3. Mr.Hiralal Chaturvedi for respondent no.8. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 30TH JULY, 2007. DATED : 30TH JULY, 2007. DATED : 30TH JULY, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.1.2007 passed by respondent no.5 by which the orders passed by respondent no.1 dated 8.2.2001 and respondent no.4 dated 5.4.2002 have been confirmed and the revision filed by the petitioner came to be rejected. By the order dated 8.2.2001 the Deputy Registrar by exercising the powers under section 79 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 had removed the petitioner as a member of respondent no.2-society. Mr.Naik, learned counsel for respondent no.3 submits that the registration of respondent no.2-society had been cancelled on 28th :2: :2: :2: February, 2001 and at its place seven societies have been created and registered and they are now functioning independently. In view thereof he submitted that the present writ petition has become infructuous. The statement of Mr.Naik has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.8. Respondent no.8 is one out of the seven societies formed and registered after cancellation of the registration of respondent no.2 - society. Mr.Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent no.8 submits that respondent no.8 has no objection for allowing the petitioner to be the member of their society. As a matter fact, he submitted, the petitioner is a member of the Managing Committee of respondent no.8-society. In view of the subsequent developments, in my opinion, the orders impugned in the present writ petition have rendered ineffective. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for respondent no.3 and respondent no.8 nothing further survives in this petition and it is disposed of as such. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)