S.B. (Service Matter! IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIOMS) N03 1°? /201 1. / Manijar Ram, son of Lakra, aged about 32 years, Watchman, Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Chilma, Block Balrampur, District Sarguja, ‘Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER: versus 6/ esgondents ( 1.. ' State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaly, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2f/Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. ‘Kssistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, Qhhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja, ‘ ‘ Chhattisgarh. 5. Block Education Officer, Block 'Balrampur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. i —\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R mmM’Qm8wl”m 200 mw(W§u) aWwW mmm WWW WW mnmm %aif<mm SB : Hon‘bie Shri Manindra Mohan Shriv’astavag J. 23.6.2G1 1 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsei for th peiitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panei Lawy r for the Siate, on advance copy. Learned counsei for ihe petiiio er su'bmits that the issue reiating i0 claim of contractuai payment to Cook and her employees came up for consideration { before this Court in WP. (S) No.2 04/11 and batch of petitions and after examining the claim of the petitione ,.this Court had directed consideration of the case in those casesr He submitst at the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid order. On the other hand. iearned counsei for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner would e decided after due verification. After going through the ord r dated 15.4.2011 passed in W.P.(S) No.2DO4/11, it is apparent that the ca e of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid order. Therefore, the pet ioner is also entitted tc the same direction in the case. Accordingly, it is directed that i the petitioner makes fresh representation before the concerned authority, claimi g payment of minimum wages applicable to a - contract empioyee under t Chhattisgarh Civii Service (Contract Appointment) Rules, 2004, the same shail be disposed of in accordance with iaw, within a period of eight weeks fr the date of submission of representation. in the event of any adverse order, petitioner would be at iiberty to tile writ petition afresh. With the aforesaid direction, th petition is finally disposed (E/ ,r’l ivastava Sd/- ’ \ (Manindra Mohan Shr a Judge i. . h o t