1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7096/2009 Suraj Mal vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 15.09.2009 HON'BLE MR. MAHESH BHAGWATI,J. Mr. Mukesh Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Mukesh Sharma Advocate on behalf of the applicant Suraj Mal pertaining to Criminal Case No. 127/2006 pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate, North, Kota in the offence under Section 380 of IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that he is being falsely implicated in this case and is in no way connected with the commission of the offences of the instant case, as such, he is entitled to crave indulgence of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and carefully perused the relevant material available on record, it is noticed that the petitioner has stultified the process of law and broke the bonds of appearance. He has hampered the trial of the case for a long period of three years. He has still been absconding and 2 now, come to seek anticipatory bail, which appears to be totally ridiculous. It is not a case, wherein the petitioner could be granted anticipatory bail, hence, the petition seeking anticipatory bail deserves to be outrightly dismissed and accordingly stands dismissed. 6. In the result, the bail petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner Suraj Mal stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI), J. Mak/- s-38