IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No 3294/2010 Vijendra & Shivdei versus State of Rajasthan through PP 7.4.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rajneesh Gupta - for the petitioners Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the matter only because petitioner No.1 is brother of Mahesh. Petitioner No.2 is a female. Mahesh, co-accused has been granted bail under section 439 CrPC. Thus, petitioners may be granted anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Sarmathpura, District – Dholpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Vijendra and Shivdei in FIR No. 277/2009 registered for offence under Section/s 363 and 366 IPC, he shall enlarge them on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)They shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)They shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv) They shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma