21 OF JUDJCATURE Ch5HATTJSGARH: BiLASPUR Bench: - Hon?bte Shri S.R. NAYAK, CJ N0.5713 OF Petit!oner: Ku. Lodhl, 30 Daughter of Shri Mangaf Prasad, Ex- h4ayor, IVIuniclpa! Corporation, BhlSai, Tahsii & District: Durg (C.G.) 1. The of C.G. Through the Seoretary, Paryayaran and Urban Devefopment Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Municipai Corporaaon, Bhllal. Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Tahsii & District: Durg (C.G.) 3. Tha Commissiuner, Munlcipa} Corporation, Bhllaj, Tahsil & District: Durg (C.G.) Present: Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, teamed counses forthe petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Govt. Advocate took notlce for the State/ respondenf No.1. Mi9^ Sangeota Mtehra, Advooate as^isting Mr. HB, Agrawal, Senior Advooate took notlce for re^pondente No.2 & 3. OR D E R on 22n<t of Rulenisi. 2. Since the impuaned order suffers from an error apparent on Its faoe, the writ petition was finally heard wi.th the coneent of learned couneel for tho partleB, •? 9 ^ ^ -2.- 3. The impugned order undeniably clvil consequences, Suoh an order ought not to have been pa^sed by the third respondent without givlng an opportunity to the petitioner. Affeoted shouid be appri^d i^ a con^titutjonai creQd flowing from Article 14 of tho Constitution of Indla insisted by prinoipies of naturaj Justice. There is a fiagrant vioSation of the said ruie. Oniy on that count, the impugned cannot be 4» The writ petition ts aliowed. The impugned orders Annexures P-1 & P-2 both 12-8-2005 are quashed. However, this not come in the way of No.2 & 3 taking in accordance with law and prindpjes of natural justice agalnst the Nocoste. Sd/-, Chief Justice '- ^b^ ^y^sh