IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3657 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 414 OF 2009. Nagalpura R. Veena ..... ..... ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ..Respondent. Mr.Harshad V. Bhadbhade, Adv. for the applicant. Ms.Noorseemu MU Big i/by Abdul Rab Shaikh, Adv. For the intervenor. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 4th Sept., 2009. PC: Heard the learned counsel for the applicant in Application No. 414/09 for intervention. Application for intervention allowed. The present applicant and her husband are directors of a company by name M/s.Info Science Consulting Services India Ltd. having registered office at Bangalore. The applicant’s company floated some scheme where under people were induced to deposit money and were promised high returns. However though the period of deposit was over, amounts were not returned. According to the prosecution various CRs are registered at Bangalore so also at Bombay. From Bombay 62 persons have deposited moneys in the company and are cheated. The present applicant being one of the directors of the company offence punishable under sections 420, 406 read with section 34 of IPC came to be registered against the applicant vide CR No. 140/09. By the present application the applicant is seeking 1 anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is a matter of common knowledge that names of wives are included as directors of company even though they have no role to play and their names are so included with a view to earn some tax benefits etc. Having regard to the fact that huge number of people are duped on misrepresentation made by the company of which the present applicant is one of the directors, I do not find this to be a fit case for release of the applicant by granting anticipatory bail. Hence applicant stands rejected. 04.09.2009. 2