.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1735 OF 2005 Mrs.Mira Gopinath Khandagale and another. ..Petitioners. Versus The Secretary, Industry, Energy and Labour Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another. ..Respondents. .... Mr.N.M.Ganguli, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.K.R.Belosey, ‘A’ Panel Counsel for the respondent. .... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 24TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Special Counsel for the State of Maharashtra at length. 2. On going through the pleadings in the Petition and the prayer clause, the learned Counsel for the petitioners fairly concedes that the Petition and the reliefs sought in the Petition are not prepared properly and, therefore, states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the Petition with .{2}. liberty to file fresh petition, if so advised. 3. It is unfortunate that the litigant is waiting in this Court from the year, 2005 merely for getting her Petition admitted. The previous orders show that the Petition was also not followed-up diligently by the Counsel who was appearing for the petitioners. 4. We are required to make aforesaid observation so that the litigant should know that the fault does not lie on the part of the Hon’ble Judges of this Court, but, the Counsel engaged by her. 5. We, therefore, permit the petitioners to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file fresh Petition, if so advised. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]