1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15225 of 2011 S.Syed Ibrahim ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Trichirappalli District 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police The Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police Thiruverambur Trichirappalli District 3. The Inspector of Police Thiruverambur Police Station Trichirappalli District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents to give police protection to the limb and the life of the petitioner so as to protect the life of the petitioner by considering the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.08.2011. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for police protection to the limb and the life of the petitioner so as to protect the life of the petitioner by considering the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.08.2011. 2. No representation for the petitioner. Heard Mrs.S.Prabha, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute and lawful owner of the property by virtue of registered sale deed, dated 23.08.2001 and he was in possession and enjoyment of the property. Subsequently, he was granted patta on 11.06.2004 by the Zonal Deputy Thasildar, Thirverambur, Trichirappalli District. On 01.03.2011, when the petitioner along with an Engineer went to his property, one Mavu Kanagaraj @ Kanagaraj, his sons came along with rowdy elements and threatened him not to enter into the property. Therefore, the petitioner has given a complaint on 01.03.2011 against the accused persons before the respondents. But, no action has been taken. Hence, the present Petition has been filed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit in her argument that the respondent police is always duty bound to protect every citizen's life and limb and the petitioner's apprehension that the said Mavu Kanagaraj @ Kanagaraj, and his sons are inimical towards the petitioners on the basis of the civil dispute and if there is an element of truth in the apprehension of the petitioner, the respondent police would give police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner also. She would further submit in her argument that if any representation is given by the petitioner, that would be considered. Therefore, he would request the Court to pass suitable orders. 5. I have perused the typed set of papers. It would go to show that there was a dispute in between the petitioner and the said Mavu Kanagaraj @ Kanagaraj, and his sons in respect of the properties. The case of the petitioner would be that the said Mavu Kanagaraj @ Kanagaraj, and his sons are still inimical towards the petitioner and are threatening. 6. The respondent police is also willing to provide protection to the life and limb of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to direct the petitioner to appear before the third respondent and to give a fresh representation and on receipt of the same, the third respondent is directed to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner. 7. With the above direction, this Petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police,Trichirappalli District 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police The Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police Thiruverambur, Trichirappalli District 3. The Inspector of Police Thiruverambur Police Station Trichirappalli District 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +1cc to M/s.R.Sureshkumar, Advocate, Sr.No.41411 vsg GH : 01.12.2011 : 2p/6c Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15225 of 2011 23.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/