^^..^..-^-^s-^.^^^.^,^.^^^^ "7 '^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (0 N0. <S( S\ /201O „ .....^mfr''< ^B.^---1'^^.^^..- l.;ese^^y;fi5&.. ^., .iSlSO'. IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; AND IN THE MATTER OF ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 ; AND IN THE MATTER OF CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CODE, 2005; JL ' 1.,;' ii, . PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ...^^".•^'^^ AND BETWEEN : <^ M/s Samay Industries, situated at Premises 92-D, Industrial Estate, Bhilai through Proprietor, Shri Sushil Kukreja, Corporate Office - 215 & 216, Dhilon Complex,Akash Ganga, Supela, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VERSUS 3. 4. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd., through its Managing Director, Ground Floor, SLDC Building, Danganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd., City Division, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd., Chhawani, Durg, Chhattisgarh District Trade and Industries Center, through the General Manager, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE AND SUITABLE WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS AiTiritoDas; A'd^^ite €:J. -\ HIGH_COURTJ3FCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR PETITIONER WRITPETITION(Q No. 6151 of2010 : M7s Saiiiay Industries VERSU8 RE8PONDENTS : Clihattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd.&Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB:HonlbIe SM4 SatishK, Agmhotri,.J. Present: Sliri Anirito Das, Advocate for the petitionen Shii S. Singh, Advocate on behalf of Sliri Suml Otwani, Advocate fbr the respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 18U1 day of November, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstmctions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriafe fomm., that may be available to the petitioner, under the provisions oflaw. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordmgly. 4. Consequently, the wrii petition is dismissed as withdrawii with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri