IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3218 OF 2002 Thangamman Temple Trust & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai & Anr.Respondents Ms. Fenila Nair for the petitioner. Ms. Archana Joshi for Respondents. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. DATE : 16th June,2006 DATE : 16th June,2006 DATE : 16th June,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the Respondent -Corporation states that the Corporation has considered the allotment of another plot to the petitioner and had decided to allot another plot and the offer had been sent to the petitioner, but the petitioner refused to accept the letter itself. She has produced a copy of the letter addressed to him. This is sufficient com-- pliance of the order dated 18th February 2003 of which contempt is alleged to have been committed. What was undertaken by the Corporation was that they would consider the allotment. They have considered and allotment is made. . As such, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. --- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)