:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1425 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1425 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 1425 OF 2007 Maharashtra General Kamgar Union ..Petitioner versus Bombay Oxygen Corporation Ltd. ..Respondents Mr. N. M. Ganguli for the Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Cama i/b. Sanjay Udeshi for the Respondents. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATE : 6TH AUGUST, 2007. DATE : 6TH AUGUST, 2007. DATE : 6TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition is basically directed against the Order dated 13.3.2007, passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Mumbai, on the application at Exhibit U-2 filed by the petitioner Union in Complaint (ULP) No. 548 of 2006. By this application, the petitioner union had prayed for interim relief restraining respondents from alienating, or disposing of the plant and machinery and the land of respondent No.1 company situate at :2: Mulund, Mumbai. Admittedly, since last about one and half year the employees are working at the respondent’s plant at Kalwa. Mr. Ganguli, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing this petition for some time, fairly stated that I need not record reasons for disposing of this petition and the Petitioner would be satisfied if directions are given to the Industrial Court to dispose of the complaint within time frame. Mr. Cama, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection for issuing such directions to the Industrial Court. Taking the overall facts and circumstances of the case into consideration, I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice. ORDER ORDER ORDER i) The Industrial Court shall decide the complaint filed by the petitioner union bearing Complaint (ULP) No. 548 of 2006 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. Industrial Court shall decide the complaint on merits in accordance with law and without being influenced by the observations made in the impugned :3: order. ii) All the contentions are kept open. iii) Parties are directed to cooperate in disposal of the complaint within the time frame. iv) With these observations the writ petition stands disposed of. (D. B. BHOSALE, J.) (D. B. BHOSALE, J.) (D. B. BHOSALE, J.)