IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 8661 of 2008. Decided on 9th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Sheela Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Respondent No. 5, already exparte. For respondent No. 6. : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Vikrant Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 09, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.