73 9J 2 I7 1 CWP No914 of2010 ln theHighCourt ofPunjabandHaryana al Dateofdecisionll l 082Ol O 1 CWI No2914 01 2010 1 EljCViretlderSingn Vs Slatc oll1oryallo olid otllers 1 2 CWP No6427 of2009 C Krishan Kumar and olllcrs Vs StateofHaryana anclotllcrs 0 3 CWP N03329 of201 0 C RajbirSinglo and othersVs Stateof l nd othcrs C5 X 4 CWP No1403 of2009 e Z Prcm Singh Vs StateofHaryana and oths A7 5 CWP No1401 nf201 0 mmeeee eneeelo e e 0 6 0 C lIlC Kulbir Singh011dunotherVs Statct11Illtrylillaallll ntllcrS I 06 6 CWP No 7536of2010 oo KaptanSinghVs StatcofIfaryalla and olhcrs me 7 CWP No203 of201 0 Z Il Desh Rai and otllcrs Vs State aild othcrs 8 CWP No147 of2010 EHC Ram Mehar and othersVs StatcofHaryana and Othcrs e 9 CWP No644232OQ2 C Jai Pal nocIanother Vs 3totc oftlaolar1tl uncl o1t11013 10 CWPNo6619 of2009 4v6 ea r SatyawanEHC Vs State ofHaryanaand others 11 CWPNo10487 of2009 Head Constablc Ashok Kumar Vs State oflaryana and othcrs 12 CWP No 12237002009 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 74 CWPN291402010 2e 4 4 1 4eee el o NarellderKIullarCollstlie Vs State01l laryana andothcrs 13 CWP N012248of2009 Jit SinghEHC Vs StateofHaiyana and others 14 CWPNo12253of2009 SubhashChanderEHC Vs State and others m Cr 15CWPNo169750f2009 0 Krishan Kumar EHC Vs StateofHaryana and others C0 15A81184300f2009 X e 6V4 ee 17 2 0 PallnuL81EllC Vs StateoflIaiyanitand otfiei7 X r 17eCWP No 18863of2009 Z j Kumar and anothei Vs StateofIltyanaand others Raj C 18 CWP No 18919of2009 4t I Kalnal Parkash EHC Vs State and others c 19 CWP No636 of2010 CO Vo LadyConstableRajbalaVs and othcrs Z 20 CWP No2775 of2010 Llwm Rishi ParshiIdand othersVs StatenflIarvanaand othcrs 21 CV14 No2875 ot 2010 LadyConstableSulnanVs StateofHaryana andotllcrs 22 CWP No2968 of2010 4e Sada Ram EtlC Vs State ofHaryanoand othcrs 23 CWP No338 of2010 KaptainSinghand another Vs Stlateofaryana and others 24 CWP N03367 of2010 EHC Mohan Lol VseStateofHarvanaandotllers Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 75 4 l CWP No 2914 of2010 03 25 CWP No556 of2010 Hans Ram and othersVs Stateofllaryana and others 26 CWP NoA258 of2010 IwlariKrishan llC Vs Finailcial Cullllnissioncr8Pritlc57251rcrct3rvfrI Oullernmcntofl8t13 2i11dolllcrs 21TlZ1L2QlQ m Ct Ainar SinghEI71CVs StateofHaryana and others 0 28 CWP NoA749 of2010 C Mohitldcr SinghEAS1 anclanotherVs StateofHaryana and others C5 29 CWP No765 ot2010 Cr Z ChhajuRain andanotherVs Statcof Ilalyanaand others e 30 CWP NoA960 of2010 C Cr RaibirSinghand otloersVs StateofHuryana and otl oll 31 CWP NoA963 of2010 Oll SatbirSinghVs StateofHaryana and olhcrs n Z 32 CWP No923 of2010 Cl Jaivir Singhand othersVs StateoflIaiyona and others 33 CWP No 6031 of2010 Hardayal HC and othersVs StateofHaryana and olers Cm CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLl Presenl Mr SK Redhu MrVikralll Sin811 MrN Yadav MrDinosh Mulik MtlPritam Saiiii MrSurendeI IunIott MlRP Singh Advocatesfor the petitioners MlRS Kundu Addl AG Hitryiulaforthe respolldentse PERMOD KQJUI J Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 76 4 1 7 CWPN0914 of2010 4 Uli tlle basis118cooinmon tlnd idenlicalissucsbothOll facfs uild law all lhese are bcingdecidedbyrhs common order The cntire controversyrelates to the of Rulc 137 oflhe Punab Police Rules 1934 as to tlle State and ainendcdvidc Punjab Policc I IatyanaAinendmentl Rules 2001 m C hereinafter referred to as tlle Rulcs 111isrulc relatcs ttI dcputationfclr 0 Lower School Course and for enlisting of the eligiblcofflcers Ill List BI 0 for their promotion The ainended rulc subjcctmatter of debate Ill thc I C5 presentwrll pCtltiollsis herellllder Z 1 37mSelectillll r Oandidatcsfor adnliision Of 141 Z courses at the Police rainingCollegeI l l ist Q B n Fornl 1371shall be maiiltaineclby each I of Police It shall include tlle C45 CQ names of all coilstablesselected for admlsslOll r 7 Z to the Lower School Course to be held at the tl Police TrainingCollegeSelection to the IistB shall be n1adc ll the onlh 01 Januarv cach el 1 yearaild shFillhe Iilniicd Lo lhC Illllnber ol SC5 1 allotted to tlle district for the year Tlle number e of seats in Lower School Course In a year shall be on thc basis of existing vacancies and thc vacancies likelyto be crealed within one year 111 the respectiveunill 550Io of tlle seats allotted to a uilit in thc Lower SchooI Course shall be flllerl in 011 the basis of a coinpetlliVC Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 e ev CWP N2914 of2010 5 examination 35 Oll the basisof CUmefitness ancl 10Io oil tlhcbasisof COllSlstent in Gold or Silver Medal in All lndia Poice AlfcetlNalionalGamesor exceplitulollsplri r m ll r brave tlle eollrse of 1If 0 0 official duty Selcction of persons agalllSt55Io I C5 seats 111Iistllower school on the basisof merit I shall be done by a Promotion c Z Committecoil thebasisofl tr Cr 1 Examinationofservicesand c6 2 l test Illcreinntlcrcai ied 13 1 CO e e2 testl1111 Z Ll a9Prade b1Law andpracticalpolicework and 3 An Intervicw C4 2 1 All constables irrespcctivcof their educational qualifiations shall bc eligibleto appear fotBwl tes ifthey are undcr the age of 35 years and huve completcd 5 years of servicc oll 18 day of Januaryof the year in which selection is madc However if a Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 78 eS1 CWP N02914 of201 0 e6 constahle to reserved catcgory 47hols Tecruited alter attainiilg thc agc of 27 yearsas per Goveriunent instructionslordcrs thcn he shall be allowed tcl appear for mllllllllll three consecutive chances aflcr t Cr of five yearsof servicc cven if llc 0 C has crossed the age of 35 years up to a I llllllllllUm of 10 years C I 4 Z 6i All Cllllstables irrespectivcof their m educational shall be cligibleto Cr et I be broughtOll 1ist 13m1 seniority CUln ment 08 basis if thcyarc under the age of 40 years cn Cr and have 5 years of service on thc 17 Z first dayof Januaryof thc ycar in which m selectionis inade 99 The State of Haryanaissucd instrllctlnr rlatcd 13022007 the Ineritto fuIliIi the criteriaor seniorit cumfltness relyingupon the observations of this Court in the case of C Naresh Kulnar Vse State of Haryanannd others CWP No3952 of 20041decided on 05112004 lOirector General of Pollce lHaryana issued thesc instructions prescribing minimum bench marks for selection to 131 Iist under 350Ioquota Thc relevant extrtlcll of 1he instructons dated 1302 2 007 Anncxure P79iil CWP No6427 of Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 79 1 CWP No 914 of2010 e7 0 2009 is hereunder 3 ln view ofthe Honble High 111the Naresh Kumar case SUIOralit has beell dccidedto flx tohebench marksfor Otnessunder 35Io quota The A C assessment O service recorcl lluUlO 1 D OC llle102 0 0 Oll thc 11llSiS11 cdilcatiotl trainill courscs I C passedconlinclldaUon certlflcatesand I of service etc as given in PPR 137 All tolle et Z candidateswho obtall a IlllllllllUln 31 marks r2 or more Would be deemcd to bc fit f7Ir Cr selection of 131 seats againsl35Io quotaOll tllc 5 basisof intermse serorityof the canddatesand 00 m2 for all such c8ndidtl llllervse seniority Wuuld Z 2 he the sole enleria 10r Oll theii 1u111 under 35Io quota111Vlew of the explicitorder of High Cour Pleasc take further necessary action 99 The validityof these instructionshas been upheldby this 4e Coult in Hawii Singh Vs StateofHaryonaand othcrs WP No1194 of20051decided on 14052008 Tltcre are tllree sets cf writ pctitionsunder considcratlOlle The sllnlc are hroadiycategoriscdlll the fullowingnlanner a the elioility ofthe catldidates who appearedin 55Io ineritl Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 80 2 CWP No914 of2010 a8 quolaunderRule 133 626i9to bc consideredfor proinotillll under35lo on basis under rule 137 iil evcn if theyhavc faiied uncicr5596quota bl cIiisldcratloil ofthe candidatesWlth Icssthan 35 ycarsofageas Oll Ist dayof Januaryof thc ycarin which selection is made in 35Yo Q quotaof 2 0 C interse seniorityof the candidatcs on the basis of bench marks Ca3 I In termsof DGPs instructionsdated 13022007 C5 I Frotnthe reading ofRulc 17Ilitemergesas follows CC Z a1 that 559o of the seats allolled lo a unit in the Lowcr School 1f A Course arc meant to be tlllcd 111 Oll the basis clf comIoetile C 4 I exanllllatiOll 5 b1 35Io ofthe seats on the basis allcl CO c 9 10Io seats on the basis of consistcnlo lll 3 Z etc CL Selection against55Io quota IS toO be made by tllC Promotional Conotnittec All the constablcs 1 oft1heireducatioilal who iirc less Illan 35 vears ofagc and have completed5 years of service on Ist dayof Januaryof lhe year rlf C selcction are eligibleto appear for Bel test under merit seats of 55Io quota SimilarlYo all the constables irrespectivc of tllclr educational qualiflcationhavingcomplctedfive years of service and 111 the age of 40 years on the Jsll day of Januaryof the year of selection Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 81 r CWP Nol914 of2010 3 are eligibleto be brought on list I3el on the basisof merit against 35Io quota Sportspersons under 10Io quota arc to bc considered subjectto eligibility l ll the above two 1 C Tlle controversyrelatiilgto the eligibilityofthe candidates 0 who tliiled to ecure therequisille lnerit 111111ecoiTlpetiliiot4211111118li011 CA I under 5594quota to be agaillCOllsidercd itnder45Yo 0 ment quotacameto be consideredby a Division 13enchof tllis Court0 et Z 111Naresh Kumars case lpra9 This Division Bench judgment was r2 before the Honble SuprcmcCourt in SpecialLeave 10 Ci AppealCivil9No10409 of2005 which has been disinissedin Iimille I 08 on 10052005 QO A similar issuecanle up for considerationbcforethis Cout1 3 Z H9SiS Harvana in lhc case ot Hawa and otllers 6CWl ClL No1 194 f20051decided on 14052008 Aflei adlnissio11ulthe Iil1ll petitionbythe Hnble Division Bench the Inatter was considered bya 1 learnedSingleJudgeof this Court for final disposal on 29 112006 1 The learned SingleJudge ofthis Court was ofthe opinionthat certalll C prOV1S1OOsof Rule 133 oftheruleswere notbroughl to the notice of the lOivision Bellcll and on tllat basis a reference was made for consideration of the writ petitionand other connected inatters by a Division Flotlch of thls Courte The n43rcsoid writ petitit11came t4l be hearclby a Oivision Bench ofthis Court Tlle f4011ble13ivisiotI Be1011 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 82 41 4 CWPN029140f2010 10 vidc its judgmentdated 14052008 afl3rmedthe ratio Ill Norcsll Kulnars case supralwith the observationsl Jn vievv of tlle facls inentioned above tIlCSC vrit pet1ti0n6 IfC allowed 111the samc tenns as ln Naresll Kuulars case 6supra hc Im are directed lo dcputethc 0 Cs3 petitionersl to the OrstLower Scllool Coursc I which will conlnleilce after the pronouilceincnt C5 Z of judgmcntIll this case However hc Z petitioner shallbc deemedto have qualillecl lll 2 0 the Lower School Course froin the date whcn otrier collstliblcs llllve qualifledwhose nanles c8 were lo undergo 1owcr School 112 t Coursevidc sclectlist AnnexureP1Itis madc mWo Z e clear that if hy gctting datc of Cl passingthe Lower School Course thc petitlonerbecameeligiblefor lhell he will get only deemed bene11tswi thout gettingany actual financial benefits in vicw of C principleof tlO WOlk 110 Pay as laiddown by their Lordshipsof the Honble SupremeCourl lll Union of India and another vs Tarsem Lal and others 2006110 SupremcCourt Cases 14 91 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 83 96 1 CWPN029140f2010 110 Ilonble the Oivision Bench furlherconsideredtho validity1Ill the instructionsclated 13022007 and upheldits validitywith thc observatlonsl So far as CWP N03609 of2007 is concemed lll that writ petitionsclect l ist to 1lr Lower SchoolCourse on thebasisof ilnstructlOns 0 dated 1022007 as rcfcrred to above has been 0 As has becn held earlicr ahovc said X C5 2r3 percctlyjustifed and are Irl C C consonanCc 1vith tlie directions issued by thi s Z Courtin NareshKumars case 6supra 19 r The claiins of some of the writ for deputing to 4C I Lower School Course have been rejectecl on the groundthat theyhaving 08 failed in 550Iomerit quotaore not entitledto bc consiclemdfor bcingbrought CO I4 on List B1 iil 35 quota The claims ofsomc oftloc writ petitioncrs har emo Z beenrejectedfor locingbroughtin List Be l undcr 35Io quolaon theground Clw that Iheywcre of Icssthan 35 yearsof age as on Isi U8 Y Il j I l 2 4711 vear of selectiotl Itl some cascs tbe cluims hIvc becn rejecledfor 11011 I9 1 achievingthe rniniinum 31 bcncll marks iIl terms ofthe DGPs Instructions 1 dated 13022 0 07 ln Naresh Kuinars case 6supraltheHonble Division ve Bench ruled the eligibility ofthe constabJes for their consideration both ln 5510 and 35Io quota This judgmenthas attlaincd flnality The SLP has also been dismissed by the Honble SupremeCourt The ratio of the said judgment has been reiterated in Hawa Singhscases supra9 as also in ConstableDharmbir Vs State ofryana and others 2009 019RSJ 310 whereinrJIeftoilowiti obserotioils 1111 becll illaclel Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 84 1 CWP No914 of2010 2 13 So there are three distinct with their own qualiftcationsand requlrementsfor eligibilityfor consideration There is no bar to considerationof a constablein any categoryifhe fulOllstbeeligibilitv criterla 11he i eiigibJcill W C 111three categorl es e hlls 11 statlltOllI 1ight110 0 considerationin all three categoriesThe Rules C0 do not categorize Or require some InlllllllUlll age I 0 for eligibility under any ofthe What it Z specifles is the uploerageliinit for consideration Z under a particularcatcgory C Despite these instructions certain issues referred to Ct herelnabove have agalncroppedup The colltroversv regardingthe 08 eligibilitycfcandidates urider35 years ofac ftIrbcingbroughl on List CCl 4C for 359 quota againcame up for considerationby anotherOivision Bench mr Z ofthis Court in Dhannbirs case 6supral and3alrai Singhand others V Il State ofHarvanaand others 2009 29RSJ 463 In Dharmbirs case a Division Bench ofthis Court held as undcr1 7 17 A conjointreadingof both the subules would show thallonly the upper age linlit 4e1n has been prescribed under the rules and 110 llllTlimum a9e hos hccn preocribedcither under sulule2 Ol sulrule ii which rncalls 1h81 if a constable fullfills the requirementof the upper age and the other qualillti ons prescribedundcr the respectivecategory as per suberule 2 there lS Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 85 It CWP N02914 of2010 3e Ito bar to his consideratinnIlnder each of thein lhcrebv a constablewho is eligiblcIll one undct Rule 117 can also bc consideredin the other catcgoryunder Rule 133 21 iil of the PuiljabPolice Rules as there IS 110 1 bifurcationbetween the rules as far as the 0 eligibility 1S concerned with regardto thc C lnllllmum agc aS nollc lS Z C 18 The minimutn age if prescribedby way of X cxecuUve i nslrucu009 1oulcl gu agalllSt Iloc r 7 lrilerest of tle C4lilstllbles t1rho tlre olherwso 5r m7 C eligibleunder thestatutory Rules Rule 133 021 I i coilfers a rightwhich a Constalolcattainson O the basis of his scnorityin lhe servlcc As 21i1d CQ whenhis turn conlcs based on the seniority a right mn Z to considerati on devolvesOll hiin This riglltOll Qm thebasisofhis senioritycannot bc deprived on tlle basisof exccutive instructirtllO T wrluld be in 17 1 6e contraveiltlctn lcl lIltl stlatutorv rules and thereforc C notsustainable 22 What emergcs from the above discussions is that a constable who has completed 5 years of servlce on thc Ist day of Januaryof the ycar 1rl whichthe selection is inadc is under the age of 35 yearsand is cligible for considcration and selecton for including his naine in List B 1 01 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 86 46 1 0 CWP N02914 of2010 4 selectedconstablesfor adtnissionto Jower School Course under thc 550Ioquotaon the basisof merit as per Rule 137 62l6ilofthe PunjabPoliceRules 1934and having in thc test 6Beelland failed or was unable to get m enlistmciltduc to Iowel Iiicl 11 ee0 Lu11 Hlso cI2in1 C considerationand selcction under the 3596 quota 0 Ca3 on the basisof as per Rulc I C5 137 021 il if he IS eligibleunder both the Z categorie 4r Z As noticed above thc constiiblcswho have attainedininimllln 0 31 bench nlarks under 35Io quotahavebcenignoredand their juniorsWCre Cr deputed to the COUTSC on the groundlhat thcyare more lnentoriouS havi 08 betterbench nlorks Thisissue isin facll covered under Naresh Kuml CQ ct case supraland canle tu be clariOcd in 13alraiSinghscass Sllptll 12 Z whereiIl ii has hecii heldthat wlierceevcr a junior has bee for CL Lower SchoolCourse ignoring tlleclailn ofthe seniorsmerelyon the busis ofthe higherbcnch marks the scnior be deputedfor the course and he will bedeemedto havc passedthe course from the datehisjuniorhasqualiOed ln such situation scnior will retainhls seniority 4de There is another aspect of the matter The DGPs inslructions datcd 13022007 are only prosjoective in nature Prior to these instructions no bcnch marks were prescribedundcr tllc statutory ruie nd tllLt 111 thosecosiablcs who acquircdeligibilily prior to issuanct of eSe instructionshave been deniecl the depulation to the Lower School Course for non achicving the minimutn bench Inarks It is settled law tllat Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 87 l 3 CWPN029140f2010 enl5 govenunent cannot overrulcthe slatutoryrules Thus thcse instructions cannot be Irito service 10 deprlve the collstablesOftheir rightfor lor ilot havingachievedthc ininiilIllnl bencloIllatJcsas uilder tlleseinstructionsissucd latcr Thus such of the constableswho bccalne oftheseinstructionsand m ignored for not theminimumbenchmarksare to be for CC LowerSchoolCourse and on successflul ofthe course tlleyare 0 Co to be tleated senior than theirjuniorswho were carlier deputed to the C Lower SchoolCourse In otherwords thcywill retain their seniorityfor brought on List B l thattheywere for the Z tlleir junlorsor tbeydid not acllicve nlinllllulll bCllCll coursc lltler tJlllO 5r 1 0C marks Cr such ofthe constableswho are ignoredon account I 05 less than the beilch lnarks then theii juiiiul5 dlC of CQ et also entitledto be to the coursc and on ofthe same will 7 Z retaintheir seniorityover theirjuniorse tl tlle constables have already ln some of the writ tlle Lower School Course but theyhave been donied the 1 seniority over their juniorson the that lllr werc either bctter bench nlarks ur deputeclIlorthe course prior in tinll3 tllail thc C Writ petitioners ln view of the above obscrvations these writ petitionersshall be dcemedto be senor to theirjuniorsdeputedcarlier on account of better bench marks or on any other groundof eligibility To sum up thesc are disposedofwith the followingclircctions i Such ofthe who have failed in 55Io merit quotoa Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 88 C3 r CWPN02914 of2010 16 are entiOcdto be consideredfor bcingbrought on List I31 under 35Io quota on the principle of providedthcyhave thc requisite and are otherwisecligible uildcr the rules iil such ofthe constableswho were lcss than 35 yearsofageas on theday oftheir consideration but not nlore than4years theywill be entitIedto bc 1C brought on List Bl by theInto Lower SchoolCourse iiil the who acquiredcligibilityloriorto 44 DC7P4instriictinns 0 C0 dated13022007 tvill be lilr the collrse witllollt the C0 questlonot llllillinum bench marks as prescribedunder the government I lnstructIOllS and in their cascs seniorityand other eligibilitycrtteria Z r prescribcd underthe rules will he enough for their to the course 0 ivl thc petitioners who becameeligiblefor after tlle issuanceof the inslructioonsclatoed13022007 aild halle achievedthe ininimum bench c6 tnarks be deputedto the course their juniorshavebctter C0 e bench nlarks a 02 v iiitese 5eniorilyof tll constaolcs ill lc delelJlliiled on thc basis cIf CL their scnirl ily in lheir rcspectivc distiicts in tlie coiistabulai and not on 1110 basis of passingof tlle Lowcr School Course in all such cases who are ignored by the above direclions Howcver thc intermseseniorityof constables wil 1 not be governedby the obove directions where senlor was 4aa inored on account of pendencyof any disciplinwy proceedingsOlWhOl suNercd any other disqualificationfor dcputationto Lower Scllool Coui7se vi deputationof the petitionersshall be inade On the basis of their seniorityin their respectivcdistric and ogainstthc av0i1051rtCElnclI Let the claim oftIie petitlonersbe considercd hl thc light of tlle above directions and tlleir deputationwhereeever required be made in Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 89 1i CWP N02914 of2010 17 accordancewith the abovedirections A copy of this orderbe placcdon the record of cnch connccted flle 1 Va 3AJ4J 1e 1120 10 PERMOD KOHLII BLS JUDOlE m 0 C 0 Note Whether to berefellrcdto theRepotter2YES C I 5 t 4 I Il Cr Z 0 Cc C 2C c6 C Cr eo Z Clw Anita 2014.04.29 14: 06 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document