1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.408 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.511 OF 2005 Shri Laxmichand Ratanshi Gada. ..Plaintiff. V/s. Shri Manoj Guiraj chainani & Ors...Defendants. And Mr.Updesh Rani Malik & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.Dhiren Shah i/b Vimal & Co. for applicant. Ms.Anita Bhaktawani, for defendant No.1 and 2. Mr.S.P.Kanuga, for Defendant No.3. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JUNE 21, 2005. DATE : JUNE 21, 2005. DATE : JUNE 21, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Mr.Kanuga, counsel appears for defendant No.3. Ms.Anita Bhaktawani counsel appears for defendant No.1 and 2. Respondents have been duly served. No reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent. Counsel for defendants have no objection, if chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). 2 2. Hence chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within 3 weeks from today. 3. In so far as prayer clause (c) and (e) is concerned, that issue is left open to be considered, as and when occasion arises, in the event defendants/- respondents file their reply to the pleadings already on record. No order as to costs.