IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6611 of 2005 MD.SUBHAN S/O LATE ABDUL WAHID, R/O VILL. BISANPUR, PO- MAKBA, PS- TARAPUR, DISTT-MUNGER ------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE BSEB, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 3. GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER,BSEB,PATNA 4. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, SAHARSA 5. ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, MUNGER 6. THEELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTIRC SUPPLY DIVISION, FORBESGANJ (ARARIA)--- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 5.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. After filing of the counter affidavit learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his only grievance is that the commutation of pension even sanctioned has not been authorized in his favour. Respondent should be directed to release the same amount in his favour. Learned counsel for the Bihar State Electricity Board submits that due to precarious financial condition the respondent as a matter of policy has decided not to release commuted value of pension to the employees till the next decision is taken in this regard. If the turns around the financial condition or the respondents are in a condition to release the same, the case of the petitioner will also be considered by the respondents. Other reliefs having been granted, this writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)