IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No. 1 OF 2007 Indra Lal Malhotra and others. ……Applicants. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another. …………...Respondents. Present: Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for the State of Uttarakhand. Date of Decision : 17.8.2010 Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the applicants Mr. Lokendra Dobhal has made a statement at the bar that during the pendency of the present 482 petition, trial proceeded before the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Dehradun and the trial has now come to end, therefore, the present 482 petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. The aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the applicants is not controverted by the learned Government Advocate. 3. In view of the above, the instant 482 petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 17.8.2010 Rathour