(L^? '0!^7 m^^ yfe^y ^i^- "^^ " • "" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATISGAR^AT BILASPUR. c- \^>\ W.P^NO. OF 2010. (^ Petitioner ^^ ^'^"rSy" ^ey €^ fyy ^/' 0-^" Respondents ^ Pratap Narain Patel, S/0 Laxmi Narain Patel, Aged about 38 years, R/0 Magarpara, Marar Galli, Bilaspur,(PO 85 Dist) C.G. STATE. VERSUS l).South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Through Chairman, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, C.G ^ 2).State Of Chhatisgarh Through Secretaiy, Dept.Of Revenue DKS Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI / ORDER (81 / DIRECTION (S). ETC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 No. 1504 of2010 > PETITIONER : Pratap Narain Patel. VERSUS RESPONDENT8 : South Eastem Coaffields Ltd. & another. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA ||Nil|llBNnC[ SB:Hon'bleShriSatishK.Affnihotri.J. Present: Shri G.S.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Veena Naii', Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sudhir BaJpayee, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel La\^er for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 06th day of July, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondent No. 1 submits that the grievance of the petitioner to gi'ant employment pursuant to the notice published in the newspaper on 05.07.2008, is under consideration. After consideration, orders shall be passed in accordance with law within a period of fbur weeks from tlie date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 2. In view ofthe foregoing, accordingto leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at fhis stage. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatistiK.Agnihom Judge Amit