IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21152 of 2010 1. CHATTU MANDAL @ CHHATU SINGH 2. Shiv Balak Mandal 3. Sanatan Mandal Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, for the State and for the informant. The defence under Section 341, 326, 307/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is of false implication. Counsel for the informant submits that the informant is the wife of the victim identifying the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 was a witness in a trial in which the alleged victim is an accused under Section 302 of the Penal Code. There was no occasion for him to kill the accused against whom he was to depose. The impugned order of rejection notices that the victim is alleged to have criminal antecedents, and was shot by his other rivals. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour (Goradih) P.S. Case No. 53/2010. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)