1 (CRA 279, 280, 281 and 282 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1379 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 593 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1380 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 592 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1381 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 595 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1382 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 596 OF 2010 M/s. Ramani Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. ...Applicant Vs. Harshad S. Gandhi and Anr. ....Respondents ****** Mr.Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Mr. Shounak Mehta for Applicant Mr.S.V. Marwadi for Respondent No.1 Mr. P.S. Hingorani -APP for the State ****** 2 (CRA 279, 280, 281 and 282 of 2010) ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITOIN NO. 1034 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1035 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1037 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1345 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1346 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1347 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1348 OF 2008 Harshad S. Gandhi ....Applicant/ Petitioner Vs. M/s. Ramani Builders Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. ....Respondents ****** Mr.S.V. Marwadi for Petitioner/Applicant Mr.Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Mr. Shounak Mehta for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr. P.S. Hingorani -APP for the State ****** CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 3RD DECEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Parties have filed the consent terms, which are taken on record in criminal writ petition nos. 1034 of 2008 to 1037 of 2008 and Criminal application Nos. 3 (CRA 279, 280, 281 and 282 of 2010) 1345 of 2008 to 1348 of 2008 filed by the Petitioner/Applicant (Respondent No.1 in the above matter). No orders have been passed in the said matters since certain compliance has to be made by the Respondent No.1 in the Writ Petitions viz. transferring TDR in favour of the Petitioners. 2. Both the counsel submits that some time may be given since procedure of complying the terms of settlement is to be worked out. Stand over for eight weeks. 3. It is further submitted that the order dated 3rd August, 2010 passed by this Court may be modified since the terms and conditions of bail granted by the Trial Court are not being pressed. 4. By the said order, this Court was pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 -Accused to furnish bail before this Court on the same terms and conditions as per the order passed by the Trial Court. 5. Since the Trial Court’s order is not available, it is clarified that the Applicant shall execute a P.R. Bond of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount 4 (CRA 279, 280, 281 and 282 of 2010) before this Court within a period of eight weeks. (V.M. KANADE J.)