KPP -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 241 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1133 OF 2011 Yuvraj Dattatraya Patil and others ...Applicants vs. Regional Joint Director (Sugar) and others ...Respondents Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for the applicants. Mr.R.M. Patne, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. Amit Borkar for respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: JULY 13, 2011. P.C. The grievance of the applicants in this civil application is that the list of members of respondent No. 2 has not been given to the applicants as per the prescribed format and what is given is only a typed copy of list of names. It is submitted that the list as per the statutory format is not given to the applicants with a view to see that the applicants may not be able to make grievance about the genuineness of the members. Since the matter is already remanded to the Registrar, the Registrar shall consider as to whether the list of members is required to be given as per the prescribed format or not and it is KPP -2- for the Registrar to give appropriate directions in this behalf after hearing the parties. This point is kept open for the consideration of the Registrar along with other documents such as minute book of the proceedings, etc. It is also clarified that in our judgment and order we have recorded that the list of members is already given to the applicants, subject to verification. If the list is not as per the statutory format, it is for the Registrar to give appropriate direction, after hearing the parties, as this Court has not concluded the issue as to whether the list given is in accordance with the statutory format or not. The applicants may bring this order to the notice of the Registrar at the time when the Registrar takes up the matter for hearing. 2. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of, subject to what is stated above. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.