IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (C) N0. f^ / 2010 PETITIONERS ^ [^ 1. Chhattisgarh Bhuini Sanrakshan Krishi Surveyor Sangh ( A society duly registered under the Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyani) through its President ...-"''"'*•* ..^' ^^ ^' .&.••'' c?.-v'^^ ^* Adhiniyani) through its Pr< ^'- R.P. Gautam , Raipur (CG). ^ 2. R.P. Gautam aged about 48 years,S/o Shri Rani Swaroop Gautam, Agriculture Surveyor, Sub Division Mahendragarh, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. Shri Sergious Minj, Principal ^ Secretary, Department of(( Agriculture, Government of | Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhavan, ^ Raipur (CG). ^ 2. Shri Pratap Rao Kridut, Director of Agriculture, Agriculture Directorate , Lameindi, Raipur , Chhattisgarh. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 XI-HC-22 ^STT^T^l r<rli<=h 3TI^? ^RW^Tfid WSHSS^ Praveen ^^ ^1141d^. ^Tl1yJI^, ^^ll^y ^.a..*....c.-..K...^ ^iI^^T^hHlcb "l^^r' ^n^i ^ciT^R'Hltn SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra chl^f<n4lT1 HW^S ^ 'fe^t iPsl^K ^r ^ri^rq ^TT^T >han Shrivastava, J. 25.01.2011 Shri Varunendra Mishra, lcounsel for tbe petitioners. Shri Alok Bakshi, counse] Learned counsel for the of the contempt petition, the r for respondent No. 1. t^etitioner submits that after filing ^spondents authority has decided the representation of the petit^oner vide order dated 12.7.2010. He submits that the petition^ remedy available to him under] to the said order. Learned counsel for T has already taken recourse to the law in the matter of challenge averments, made in the return order of this Court, the repres^ntation of the petitioner has been decided and the respondent/ccj delay which has been caus^ procedural delay, without thei^ order of this Court. Taking into consideratiorj counsel for the parties and thej submission made on affidavit rule is discharged. Petition is accordingly fin^ respondents, referring to the submits that in compliance of the ntemnor prays for apology for the d, which was only due to the e being any intention to flout the the subniission made by learned circumstances of the case as also ^y the respondent/contemnor, the illy disposed off. SAI:.S^9sta<a *^0^ ^» d(a^^