IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8334 of 2008. Decided on: 03.06.2011. _____________________________________________________ Satish Kumar Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunny Datwalia, Advocate vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Sunny Datwalia, Advocate appearing vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 03, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?