IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 314 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Gulam Rassul @ Gami .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 332/1999, U/s 7/16 Prevention & Food Adulteration Act and 272 IPC, PS Rishikesh, District Dehradun. _______________________________________________________________ March 31, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that in the report of the chemical analyst, percentage of urea found in the sample of milk has not been mentioned. It has also not been mentioned as to what is prescribed standard of urea in the milk. He further submitted that on the basis of the averments made in the FIR, only a case under Section 7/16 of Prevention & Food Adulteration Act can be said to be made out against the applicant. He also submitted that the applicant has got no previous criminal history, who is in jail since 8.2.1010. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Gulam Rassul @ Gami be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 31.3.2010 PRABODH 2