IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33588 of 2010 ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY S/O LATE NAGESHWAR PANDEY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 28.04.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation. Marriage is of the year of 1995. Earlier also a complaint case was filed on behalf of the complainant that was dismissed due to taking no step. Continuation of demand for such a long period which is followed by filing of complaint after five years of party’s separation is not believable for refusal of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 127C of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Mandhata Singh, J.)