IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH MAGHA 1929 RP.No. 1222 of 2007(G) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20438/2007 Dated 07/08/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- SRI. REGHUNATHAN, PUTHAN MADOM, PERINJANAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., THRISSUR. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.M.R.SREELATHA SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= R.P. No. 1222 of 2007 (G) ======================= Dated this the 31st day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this review petition seeking review of my judgment dated 7-8-2007 in W.P.(C) No.20438/07. His contention is that contentions based on the Division Bench decision in Anish.V.Kumar v. RTA and Others [2007(1) ILR Kerala 386], has not been considered in that judgment. I am not inclined to entertain this review petition for two reasons. Firstly, the petitioner never raised that contention before me at the time of arguments, although he had raised such a contention in the writ petition. Secondly, the facts of the two cases are not similar. Thirdly, the route in question in that decision related to a route between two intersecting points in a circular route whereas in this case, the petitioner seeks renewal of a temporary R.P. No. 1222/2007/G -2- permit between two linear points in a circular route and on facts that decision is not applicable. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this review petition and the same is dismissed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp