IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECE[/lBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOS: 1178,1179,1180 AND 1181 OF 2007 CRL.R.C.NO.1 178 0F 2007: Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment made in Crl.A.No.115 oJ2006 dated 16/08/2007 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, at Karimnagar preferred against the Judgment made in CC No.615 of 2003 dated 2410712016 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class IMagistrate, at Godavarikhani. Between: Chada Srinivasa Reddy, S/o Venkat Reddy, AND .,.REVISION PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1. The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.' Hyderabad 2' Kasarla surender Reddy' S/o Nagi Reddy' ...REspoNDENTS/coMpLArNANT CRLRCMP. NO:1711 OF 2007 Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds of criminal Revision case, the High court may be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed in Crl.A.No.1 15 of 2006 dated 16.08.2017 on the file of First Additional sessions Judge, Karimnagar confirming the Judgment in CC.No. 615 of 2004 dated 27.04.20OO on the file of J'F'C'lr/, Godavarikhani and enlarge the petitioner on bail. CRL.R.C.NO.1179 0F 2007: criminal Revision case under Sections 397 & 401 of cr.P.c against the Judgment made in crl.A.No.'l 14 of 2006 dated 16/08/2007 on the file of thecourtof the I Additional sessions Judge, at Karimnagar preferred against the Judgment made in cc No.614 0f 2003 dated 24107t2016 0n the file of the court of the Judicial First class Magistrate, at Godavarikhani. Between: Chada Srinivasa Reddy, S/o Venkat Reddy, AND ...REVISION PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1. The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor' High Court of A.P., Hyderabad' 2 Kasarla Surender Reddy' sio Nagi Reddy' ...RESpoNDENTS/coMpLArNANT fl (- >'- / / CRLRCMP. NO: 1 712 t tF 2007 Petition under S:ction 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances staled in the Memorandum o grounds of criminal Revision case, the High court may be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed in crl.A.No.114 of 2006 dated 16-o8.2017 on the file rf First Additional sessions Judge, Karimnagar confirming the Judgment in cc.No. 614 of 2004 dated 27.04.2006 on the file of J.F.C.M, Godavarikhani and enl trge the petitioner on bail. cRL.R.C.NO.11 80 0F 2007: criminal Revisic n case. under sections 397 & 401 of cr.p.c against the Judgment made in crl.r .No.'1 17 of 2006 dated 16/08/2007 on the fite of the court of the I Additional Sessions JL dge, at Karimnagar preferred against the Judgment made in cc No.95 of 2004 dated :410712016 on the file of the court of the Judicial Frrst class [\/agistrate, at Godavari ihani. Between: Chada Srinivasa Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, AND 1. The State of A.P 2. Kasarla Surende ...REVISION PETITIONER/ACCUSED 'I . The State of A.P rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court of A.F., Hyderabad 2. Kasada Surende neiOoy, slo Nagi Rea;t,---' ' ,..RESPONDE NTS/I:OMPLAINANT CRLRCMP . NO: 1713 t tF 2OO7 Petition under s:ction 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum o grounds of criminal Revision case, the High court may be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed in crl.A.No.117 of 2006 dated 16.o8.2017 on the file rf First Additional sessions Judge, Karimnagar confirming the Judgment in cc.No. 95 of 2004 dated 27.04.2006 on thr: fire of J.F.c.M, Godavarikhani and enl lrge the petitioner on bail. cRL.R.C.NO.1 181 0F 2007: criminal Revisic'r case under Sections 397 & 401 of cr.p.c against the Judgment made in cd.l .No.116 of 2006 dated 16/08/2007 on the file of the court of the I Additional sessions JL cge, at Karimnagar preferred against the Judgment made in cc No.616 of 2003 dated ?.4107 t2016 on the fite of the court of the Judrciat First ctass l\,4agistrate. at Godavari hani. Betwee n: Chada Srinivasa Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, ...REVISION PETI TIOhIER/ACCUSED AND lep, Fy E PublicProsecutor, High Court of A.p., Hyderabad. Reddy' s/o Nagi Reddy' ...RESpoNDENTS/coMpLArNANT .'t- 3 petition under Sect in the r\rremora,.,; ;;"Tllilli j;l rJ:il: l^,' in the circumsta nces srated pleased to suspend tn. ."r,^",]^" ,:':l^",':'"" case, the High court may be ;:ffi ;[:il ii. ::Hffi ,' : : ffil ",:, i ] i],1 j,.,i:*:,r;: Godavarikhani ".0 ".,"*",,.lJr::::":::""r, zt.04.2006 ".,n."i," ", r'r ., CRLRcMP.NO:1 7140F2007 The Court made the following: ORDER For the petitioner in all : SRI K.M.MAHENDER REDDY, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 in all .: pUBLtC PROSECUTOR For the Respondent No.2 in all : SRt S.SATYAM REDDY, Advocate TT tE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI ])E\/I CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos. 1178 tt79 1180 and 1181 of2007 JUDGNIEN I: Learnt d counsel lor 2"d respondent is prcscnt. FIowever, inspite of repeated alls, none appears on behalf of the revrsion petitioner. Hence, this lourl is constrained to dispose ol thesr re'rision cascs basing on tht rnaterial available on record. 2. Revisi ,n petitioner herein is the accused in C.rl.Nos.614, 615 and 616 of i 003 and in C.C.No.95 of 2004 on the file of Judicial Magistrate o First Class, Godavarikhani. He was convicted by the trial court ty judgment dated 24.07.2006 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo Simp le Imprisonment for six months and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each in C.C.Nos.614, 615 and 616 or- 2003 and to undergo Siml le Imprisonment lbr six months and to pav a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- n C.C.No.95 of 2004. 3. The ap reals pref'erred by the revisiolt petitioner betbre the Court of I A lditional Sessions Jurige, Karimnagar vicie Criminal Appeal Nos.l14 to 117 of 2006 are dismissed conhrming the conviction an( sentences imposed by the trial Court. Hence, these revlstons. J I I T I Ctt RC.Nos. il z8, u zs, u80 & t nt ffyob/ In these revisions, it is th,e case of the revision petr.tioner that the Courts below did not examine the evidence in proper perspective and also did not take into consideration the evidence lavourable to him. 5. The trial Couft, on examining the oral and documentary evidence on record, found that the complainant has established the case against the accused. The trial Court did not believe the version ofthe accused that his signafure was obtained on blank cheques, and accordingly, convicted and sentenced him as mentioned above. The Iower appellate Cou11, on examining the material on record, confinned the.judgment of the trial Court. 6. On a perusal ol the material on record, the judgrnents of the triai Court as well as the lower appellate Courts, I am of the consideled view that there are no valid grounds to interfere with the concurrent findings of the Coufts below. I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the orders passed, waranting interference by this Court. 7 All these revision cases are devoid of merit and are accordingly dismissed. Pendin miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-CH.VENKATESWARULU DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' G" SECTION OFFICER 1 2 3 4 E 6. 7. 8. Kj The I Additional Sessions Judge, atKarimnagar. (with records, if any) The Judicial First class lvlagistrate, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. (with records, if any) The Superintendent, District Jail, Karimnagar. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hvderabad (OUT) O'ne CC to Sri K.lr/.Mahender Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri S.Satyam Reddy' Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies One Spare CoPY To N 2 \ HIGH COURT DATED:07112121t21 ORDER CRLRC.Nos.l' 78, 1179, 1180 and 1181 of 2007 Dismissing the all Crl.R.Cs. \ I B i JAH 2022 '\* r, SIA]'5 t: -,: t- \\ ." ll -',' lt _!. // )