CWP-3288/10 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3288/2010 Sukharam & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date Of Order :: 13/12/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Mahendra Sharma, for petitioners. This is a joint petition filed by the petitioners who were appointed as Constable (Armorer) way back in September, 1989/December,1991. Their grievance is that examination for promotion to the post of Head Constable (Armorer) has not been held and they have not been considered for promotion on the premise that petitioners were not appointed as Constable (Armorer) and their further grievance is that as they were holding technical posts were entitled for second and third selection scale which became due and admissible to them as per the circular issued by the government from time to time. However, before approaching to this Court a legal notice was served by the petitioners, pursuant thereto the respondent vide their communication dt.08.02.2010 have sent parawise reply and even grievance of the petitioners has also been meted out for which CWP-3288/10 (2) they alleged themselves to be eligible for promotion to the post of Head Constable (Armorer) and so also the benefit of selection scale have been denied. Counsel submits that petitioners are holding the technical post and neither the examination has been held for Head Constable (Armorer) nor they have been considered for promotion in their regular stream. The respondents have decided their representation by communicating their decision dt.08.02.2010 and what has been contended by the petitioner relates to service disputes which is covered u/s.2(F) of the Act of Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal Act,1976 and if the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision communicated impugned herein dt.08.02.2010 they are always at liberty to avail the remedy available to them under the Act of 1976. This Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition. Consequently, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.2 3288cw10Dec13FnlDsps.doc