1 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail No.2187/09 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2187/2009 (Chhaju Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 20/04/2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. M.K.Garg for the petitioner. Mr. O.P.Singaria, P.P. This bail application has been filed by petitioner Chhaju Ram through Mr. M.K.Garg, Advocate in FIR No.142/07, P.S. Rajgarh, District Churu for the offences under Sections 376, 366 and 363 IPC challenging the order dated 24.10.2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Churu in Cr. Case No. 314/08. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing this bail application on 6.4.2009, counsel came to know that very accused petitioner has filed another bail application being S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.1940/09 “Chajju Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan” on 26.3.2009 and therefore, seeks to withdraw the instant bail application since the very order impugned has been challenged in earlier bail application filed by the petitioner on 26.3.2009. In the circumstances, therefore, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant bail application. The bail application is therefore, dismissed as withdrawn and the order of withdrawal would not come in the way of the petitioner in the earlier bail application filed by him. From the record, it appears that the concerned clerk in the Registry had made an endorsement that “NO MATCHING 2 S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail No.2187/09 DETAILS FOUND”. Obviously the report dated 8.4.2009 made by the concerned Clerk of the Registry is contrary to the record to the extent that very petitioner has filed bail application on 26.3.2009 being S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail No. 1940/09. The Deputy Registrar (Judicial) is therefore, directed to take appropriate action against erring clerk for such lapses who made report on 8.4.2009 to the extent that “NO MATCHING DETAILS FOUND” (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp