WP(C) 93/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H BARUAH Heard Mr A Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioners as well a s Mr S Das, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. None appears for the respondent Nos. 6, 8, 9, 11 and 12. Prior to 01.04.1993, the petitioners herein, were engaged as cas ual Muster Roll Workers in the Forest Department. The dates of such engagement o f the petitioners are indicated in Paragraph -2 of the writ petition. The grieva nce of the aforesaid petitioners is that though they were engaged prior to 01.04 .1993, they were not provided with revised fixed pay @ Rs. 2,500/- per month, al though the private respondents have been provided with such benefit on the basis of the letter issued to the Chief Conservator of Forests, Assam, by the Princip al Chief Conservator of Forests, Assam, vide letter No. FE. 20/I/ Pt.IV dated 22 nd Octover 2008. It is an admitted fact that the petitioners are not in the emplo yment of the Forest Department at present. Mr Roshid, learned counsel representi ng the petitioners, is unable to place any evidence of termination of engagement of the petitioners. On this score alone, the claim of the petitioners that they should be provided the revised fixed pay @ 2, 500/- per month, would be unsusta inable. The petitioners have not pleaded in the writ petition anywhere the date of their disengagement in the Forest Department. Therefore, the relief(s) as sou ght for by the petitioners by this writ petition cannot be provided. The writ pe tition appears to be meritless. In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.