IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3437 of 2011 DHARMENDRA KUMAR, son of late Anant Rai, resident of village Bhainsahi, P.O.Karup, P.S. Sasaram, District-Rohtas… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA through its Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Post Box No.8587 Kandiwali (East),Mumbai 400 010. 2. The General Manager State Bank of India Local Head Office, 7th Floor, Main Branch, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 3. The Deputy General Managerr, Zonal Officer,Mahendru, Patna. 4. The State Information Commission, Block No.4 (5th Floor) old J.N.C.Campus, New Delhi 110 067…… ….. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate For S.B.I.: Mr. Kaushalendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate -------- 2. 28.2.2011 The petitioner seeks a direction upon the authorities under the R.T.I. Act to supply necessary information to the petitioner in terms of the application, first appeal and second appeal filed by the petitioner under the said Act. Learned counsel for the State Bank of India points out that the application under the R.T.I Act as also the first appeal under the said Act have not been sent to the proper address and it appears that for the said reasons the information sought has not been supplied to the petitioner. Faced with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to file a fresh application before the authorities of the Bank under the R.T.I. Act. The writ application is, accordingly, - 2 - dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. In case such an application is filed, then the authorities under the R.T.I. Act shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law keeping in view the reasons for the delay. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )