^ ^ ^" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (C) N0. "? 2C) 1 / 2011 PETITIONER ^.- ^ ^VA-'%1^ j3^'" ....•-"' ^€^-^n^ •"^ ...-•'"^o 1 ,£»•"' ^•••" RESPONDENTS Baijnath Agrawal, S/o. Shri Omprakash Agrawal, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Patthalgoan, Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OFINDIA sii^i vs Is-fi* OTT ^R^T si>*iiq> u»«pi TST -4i<(in<i, eifli'y'Ko, fadiyy HINCW a>*l|tb .^.f?...Q)..^.::.^^ 200 SiIiRl 'VS^K ( Ylt^l^) TOiW^lfiRM^I 'riiici'ili wigf 41yz> <F>|<<|< ^SllOT 311^1 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohdn Shnvastava, J. 02-12-2011 Shri Saurabh Dangi and Msj Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Deputyl Bulbui Agrawal, counset forthe petitioner. Advocate General along with Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocats for the Stay. Learned counsel for the parlfes submit that an order has been passed in the identical cases arising from the ^ame area and on accountof similar notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Lailuntia, Raigarh. Not disputed. Accordingly, this writ petiti|an is also disposed off on the same lerms. However, the Nagar Panchayat w(ll not take any action without arfording proper opporhinity of hearing to the pere^n concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorizecj dispute, before passing the orde| concerned. or unauthorized structure, as the same is in \, after considering the cases of the persons Sd/'- Manmdra Mohan Shs-ivastava ^re^flT t&iftlT ig^ITcSff, -t'S/140—2/2011—1.50,000. a^ H8 *;^ N ^^ 1-1^H -i- f! !| ; : ;•!• r