IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD ESTATE DUTY REFERENCE No 2 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ NAYANBHAI JAYANTILAL Versus CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. ESTATE DUTY REFERENCE No. 2 of 1989 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 20/06/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) This was a reference made at the instance of accountable person. As per the office endorsement, a notice of the reference has already been served on the accountable person. However, no appearance has been filed on behalf of the accountable person nor anyone appears when the matter is called out for hearing. Even the paper book is not filed. Mr Manish R Bhatt is present for the revenue. In view of the above, we decline to answer the reference as not pressed. The Reference accordingly stands disposed of. (M.S. Shah,J) (K.A. Puj,J) zgs/-