IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9126 of 2011 RAJENDRA PRASAD MANDAL , son of Sri Narayan Mandal, resident of village & P.O. Saraunikala, Police Station- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura. … petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Principal Secretary, H.R.D., Patna. 2. The District Teacher Niyojan Appellate Authority, Madhepura through Member. 3. Gram Panchayat Niyojan Ekai, Saraunikala Gram Panchayat, P.S.- Bihariganj, District Madhepura. 4. Prakhand Shiksha Padadhikari, Gowalpara, P.S.- Gowalpara, District Madhepura. 5. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Saraunikala, P.O.- Saraunikala, P.S. Bihariganj, District- Madhepura. 6. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Saraunikala, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura. 7. Sri Anil Kumar, son of Sri Chedanand Manda, resident of village- Fakirna, P.O.- Saraunikala, P.S. Bihariganj, District- Madhepura. … Respondents. ----------- 2. 20.05.2011 After some argument, Mr. Narayan Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner as with regard to the following relief:- "That this writ application is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.4.2011 passed by District Teacher Niyojan Appellate Authority, Madhepura in Appeal Case no. 75/2009 whereby Gram Panchayat Niyojan Ekai has been directed to cancel the Niyojan of the petitioner and it has been also directed to send the order of the aforesaid order to Panchayat Secretary and Prakhand Shiksha Padadhikari to comply the aforesaid order." would seek permission to withdraw this writ application. It has to be noted that the District 2 Teachers Appellate Authority in the impugned order while setting aside the appointment on the post of Panchayat Teacher has held as follows:- ^^fu;ksftr f’k{kd jktsUnz eaMy dk ds’k vU; fu;ksftr f’k{kdksa ls vyx gSA muij vkjksi gS fd budk tUe frfFk 25-11-69 gS vkSj ;s viuk xyr frfFk fnukad 25-11-1973 fn[kkdj viuk fu;kstu djok;k gSA fcgkj ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk la[;k 1458 fnukad 11-08-2004 ds vuqlkj fiNM+s oxZ vH;FkhZ dk vf/kdre mez 32 o"kZ ls T;knk ugha gksuk pkfg,A buds eSfVzd ds izek.k i= ds vuqlkj budk tUe frfFk 25-11-69 gSA Ldwy iath;u eas Hkh budk tUe frfFk 25-11-69 gSA vr% igyh tuokjh 2005 fu;kstu o"kZ esa budk mez 3 o"kZ 5 ekg 25 fnu vf/kd FkkA jktsUnz e.My us {ks=h; f'k{kk mifuns'kd lgjlk dk dk;kZy; vkns'k Kkikad 368 fnukad 01-03-2011 nkf[ky fd;k gSA {ks=h; mi funs'kd us jktsUnz eaMy dk vf/kdre mez lhek dks fcgkj lsok lafgrk dh /kkjk 776 ds vkyksd esa vf/kd vk;q ds mez {kkfUr fd;k gSA fcgkj lsok lafgrk dh /kkjk 54 ds uksV ds vuqlkj mez {kfUr dk vkns'k fu;kstu ds le; fd;k tkuk pkfg, u fd fu;kstu ds 6 lky cknA tc jktsUnz eaMy us ik;k fd mldk vkijkf/kd d`r vc idM+k tk;sxk rks ,Su&dsu izdkjsu mDr vkns'k izkIr fd;k gS tks vkijkf/kd d`r dks fNik ugha ldrk gSA vr% eSa ikrk gwW fd jktsUnz eaMy dk fu;kstu fu%lR; ,oa vizek.kkZFkd gSA vr% budk fu;kstu jn~n djus dk oS| dkj.k gSa vr% fu;kstu bZdkbZ jktsUnz eaMy dk fu;kstu jn~n dj lwfpr djsaA** This Court is really amazed as to how the District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura and Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa vide order dated 1.3.2011 had combined together for condoning the maximum age limit of entry in government service of petitioner and one more 3 teacher Rajendra Prasad Bharti, when such power could be exercised only before entering in government service. This is a matter of grave concern and therefore this Court would direct the Principal Secretary of Human Resources Development Department to look into this aspect and find out as to whether the District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura vide Letter No. 109 (Uchcha) dated 27.1.2011 had any jurisdiction to make such recommendation for condonation of age of the petitioner and one Rajendra Prasad Bharti and whether the action of Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa in passing the order contained in Memo No. 368 dated 1.3.2011 is justifiable and in accordance with law. If the Principal Secretary would find that these two persons, namely, D.S.E., Madhepura and R.D.D.E, Saharsa being hand in glove had issued a wholly unauthorized order for condoning the age limit of the petitioner and one Rajendra Prasad Mandal, the two panchayat teachers he would initiate a departmental proceeding against them for a major penalty. Such action must be taken 4 within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Let a copy of this order be sent to the principal Secretary of the Human Resources Development Department for its strict compliances kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)