o (A'^\^ BENffl 03 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.N0.1 $ 7 C>/2005 PETITIONER: Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, S/0 Shri Late Vijay Kumar Tiwari, Aged about 21 years R/o. Forest Colony, Near Sector-4, Balco Nagar, Korba, District Korba.(C.G.) VERSUS •^ RESPONDENTS: A^ ^^ [1] Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipnan Sangh Maryadit, Through, The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipnan Sangh Maiyadit, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) [2] Manager, Kisan Rice Mill, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) (3) M.P. Rajya Sahkari Vipnan Sangh Maiyadit, Through Sectretary, M.P. Rajya Sahkari Vipnan Sangh Maryadit, , Jahangirabad^Bhopal Distt. Bhopal (C.G.) .1^^__.^_.. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORERI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTIONS OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T f^;lt^3Tr^T $h^icb^rf?cT 3^T ^I^IKrl^, ^Tfl<M^j$, ^^l^l^< 311^1 M51Qb ^l^^l $b^|cb 200 5~^ ^rc^ 32 3:TT^T^[<TTW:^f?cT 26-4-2Q05 cdunsel ih beio|i9 bfei Heard Mr. A.P. Sharma, The case of the petition| Tiwari was working as Heiper Raigarh, the said Rice MiIIs Federation, and the petitioner^ On 15-2-2002, the petitioner'^ compassionate appointment of Rajya Sahakari Vipandn Sangh 2-2000 directed Smt. Gow\ proforma fuifiiting the requitted compliance of the same, an proforma with ail requirement^ Annexjjres P-4 to P-8. Th< representations to the re^ their side. Learned counsel for circumstances, the respondents| petitioner for compassion^te representations and application^ of Tne request made by lec|r fair and reasonable. sspon^ents <=hi^Id41^ ^i^<viT^te^'<f^^i< ^'3rf^T3:n^T for the petitioner. i^r is that his father Late Vijay Kumar Kisan Rice MiIIs, Saran9Grh, District: to the State Co-operative Marketing father died in harness on 25-1-2000. mother Smt. Gouri Bai applied for the petitioner. The Madhya Pradesh A^aryadit, Raipur/vide its ietter dated 24- b^si to send an application in prescribed information and particulars. In o|pplication was sent in the prescribed i, and copies of those documents are |reafter, the petitioner made severai s, but nothing has been heard from ^he petitioner submits that in the |be directed to consider the case of the appointment, considering the the petitioner. rned counsel for the petitioner is just, XI-HC-22 ^1^<<11 »)^|ch ^^T ^l^ld^, ^TfI'M1!^, fa^lKl^i ;^| q^j^ ^ g^^...-................y^ 2005^ 33 Id^ 3TT^T^T Rrli<=h3n^T ^HT^^rfN' Soma 3TT^T^<TTW:^cf -2^+ Therefore, having heard having perused the record, I am| ends of justice, if the petitionei respondent No.l within 15 days is allowed to make a representa|tion from today raising all his points, copy of the petition aiong with No.l shaJI decide the representa|! three months from the date considering ail the points raise< law. With the direction afores<|) Consequentiy, I.A.No.30511 Parties are entitled for ce|r1 learned counsel for the parties and of the opinion that it wouldmeet the is allowed to make a representation to rom today. Accordingty, the petitioner to respondent No.l within 15 days and annexing reievant documents and a ^he representation, in turn, respondent it-ion of the petitioner within a period of its receipt, in an objective mQnner, by the petitioner, in accordance with olT ^N?<n41^ *4i^^T^te1cc9"<Ri<r4i< ^3:rf^T3T1^T lid thepetition stands disposed of. 1/2005 aiso stands disposed of. rtified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (<^y^)