IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7089 of 2011 ANUJ RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. It appears that in course of investigation, the victim returned to his home safely and his statement under section-164 Cr.P.C. was recorded. In the aforesaid statement, the victim named the petitioner. Admittedly, the petitioner and victim are co-villagers and having similar allegation, co-accused, Anil Rai has already been granted privilege of bail by this court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Anuj Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 360 of 2000 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna. AKV/ (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)