SBWMAP239/2009 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Correction Appl. No.239/2009 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.382/2009 {Murari Lal Gupta Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others} Date of Order ::: 27.01.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Saransh Saini, Counsel for petitioner Shri Ganesh Meena, Government Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- The present application has been filed by the petitioner pointing out that there are certain typographical errors in the judgment dated 13.07.2009 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.382/2009. In the application it is stated that the petitioner was actually promoted on the post of Office Assistant vide order dated 27.10.1997, but that date has wrongly been mentioned in the judgment at Pages No.2, 3 and 5 thereof, as 15.01.1995. Furthermore, in the judgment it is stated that the petitioner declined to accept that promotion by his letter dated 27.01.1995 whereas actually it was declined by him on SBWMAP239/2009 // 2 // 15.11.1997 and this mistake occurred at Pages Nos.2, 3 and 5 of the judgment. Learned Government Counsel for the respondents also does not dispute this position and, in my view, corrections of these mistakes would not make any material difference so far as the contents of the judgment are concerned. The application is, therefore, allowed and it is directed that date 15.01.1995, mentioned at Pages 2, 3 and 5 of the judgment, of grant of promotion to the petitioner on the post of Office Assistant, be read as 27.10.1997, and further the date 27.01.1995, mentioned at Pages 2, 3 and 5 of the judgment, of the letter of the petitioner by which he declined to accept the promotion, be read as 15.11.1997. There is also a typographical error in respect of the date of the order dated 01.06.2008, passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, referred to in Para 2 of the judgment, be read as 01.06.2005. The application accordingly stands disposed of. Compliance of the judgment dated 13.07.2009, which was originally directed to be made within a period of three months from the SBWMAP239/2009 // 3 // date a copy thereof is produced before the respondents, should now be made within a period of three months from the date a copy of this order is produced before the respondents. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//