G) $IN$§£ 85N£H IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition (S) 5’83? or 201 1 V, Petitioner Smt.Reena soni w/o Lalan saha Age about 31 years, Maharana pratap ward, Hoispital colony, Bishrampur, District Surguja (C.G.) Vs. Respondent :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Department of Women 85 children welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Ditrict Collector, District- Surguja Ambikapur (C.G) 3. The Project Officer, Janpad panchayat Surajpur, District— Surguja. (C.G) The Chief Muncipal Officer, Nagar panchayat Bishrampur, District- Surguja (CG) 5. Ku. Snehalata Karketa d/o Prabhudayal Karketa, Mahatama Gandhi Ward No. 4, Bishrampur District —Surguja (C. G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE $ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA S : . W..KER 6IWAKg R 13.10.2011 Shri Keshav Gupta, co‘ nsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, P. . for the State. Learned counse! for t petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this p tition with liberty to avail alternative remedy availabl to the petitioner under the iaw. He, however, submit that in the event of an appeai being filed by the petitioner, the respondents may be directed to decide t e same as expeditiously as possible on merits ignoring the point of limitation. To this, State counsel has no o jection. Accordingly, the p tition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if n appeal is filed by the petitioner, the authority oncerned shall decide the same expeditiously in accor ance with law. & \, i “if/M Sdl— Pritinker Diwake' \ L, Judge mew item gamma. usm‘zrria—Fs/i 40—2/20! i—l ,so,ooo. ?;D 3a WWW, 2Wmrc; fartwg? mzoo «mi?!W (WWa) m mfiwiaa mm mam WW tma‘f § fwm a: aim am