IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 398 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 398 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 398 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2205 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 2205 OF 2000 PETITION NO. 2205 OF 2000 H.J. Leach & Co. & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. Directorate of Revenue ... Respondents Intelligence & Ors. Mr. V.K. Rambhadran for the petitioner. Mr. N. Manje i/b. Mulla & Mulla for respondent No. 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 10th November, 2006 : 10th November, 2006 : 10th November, 2006 P.C. . By order dated 23.07.2004 in Notice of Motion No. 568 of 2003, we had reduced the amount of bank guarantee to be furnished by the petitioner in the sum of Rs. 259644/-. In the present motion the learned counsel for the petitioner points out that Rs. 259644/- has been paid to the respondents. Once that be the position, the petitioners are entitled to return of the bank guarantee. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that they are entitled to interest on the delayed payment. That can be considered at the time of hearing and final disposal of the petition. ( 2 ) 3. Considering that, the Notice of Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Motion stands disposed of accordingly. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]