IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18463 of 2010 1. SHASHI DEVI, W/o Ram Pratap Ram. 2. Biru Kumar @ Guddu, S/o Ram Pratap Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 06.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 5 of Explosive Substance Act and Sections 17 and 18 of Cr.L.A. Act. Considering the nature of allegations and five persons lost their lives, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, they may renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioners’ case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge in case it is done the petitioners’ prayer for bail shall not be considered. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)