1 SBCW NO. 10186/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10186/2008 Dharmendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order : : 08.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Rahul Bathi for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents. By an application being I.A. No.3817/2009, the petitioner seeks early hearing of the writ petition. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the instant case stands concluded by the decision of this Court in Kanhaiya Lal Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others, S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 6947/2008 decided on 29.9.2008. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not dispute the preposition and submits that the matter may be decided in the light of decision rendered by this Court in Kanhaiya Lal Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others (supra). In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed 2 SBCW NO. 10186/2008 in terms of the order passed by this Court in Kanhaiya Lal Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others, S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 6947/2008 decided on 29.9.2008 and the respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the purpose of appointment to the post of Prabodhak as per the provisions of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Rules, 2008. If the petitioner stands in merit, appointment be accorded to him. The application seeking early hearing also stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp 3 SBCW NO. 10186/2008 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 17456/08 In S.B.Civil Writ petition No. 10186/08 Date of Order : 08/04/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Rahul Bathi for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents. Since the writ petition itself has been allowed, the stay petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp