IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Rev. No. 170 of 2010.. Date of Decision: 29.10.2010. _______________________________________________ Vipan Kumar. ...petitioner. Versus. State of H.P. ….Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner :Mr.Virender Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondent-2. :Mr.P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. Advocate General. For respondent-1. Mr. Satyan Vaidya, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). Cr.M.P(M).No. 937 of 2010. For the reasons set out in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr. Revision No. 170 of 2010. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the sentence imposed by the two courts below convicting him to undergo imprisonment for a period of three months on the ground that the cheque issued by him Ext.C-2 amounting to Rs.23,450/- was dis-honoured without any reasonable cause. This Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?yes. sentence has been affirmed by the learned appellate Court which not only re-appreciated the entire evidence but also consider the submission made on the points of law. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reiterates the same points which were urged before the courts below. Those having been determined as a question of fact, this Court will not interfere in revisional jurisdiction. This revision petition is dismissed. 4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued that the sentence of imprisonment is set aside subject to the condition that the petitioner herein shall deposit a sum of Rs.46,900/- as compensation before the learned trial Court within a period of six weeks from today. On such deposit being made, the amount shall be paid to the complainant-respondent forthwith. It is further directed that in case of non deposit of the amount as ordered, the sentence of imprisonment shall revive and the petitioner shall undergo the sentence of imprisonment as imposed by the Courts below. The petition is disposed of. All miscellaneous applications are also disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. October 29, 2010(R)