IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.667 of 2007 BINOD KUMAR YADAV @ BINOD YADAV Versus ANITA DEVI & ANR ----------- 3. 29.7.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order dated 10.4.2007 as well as the petition filed under section 125 Cr.P.C. and its rejoinder. It appears from the order that the interim maintenance has been granted to the opposite party at the rate of Rs.1500/- per month. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that actually, the opposite party is not legally married wife of the petitioner and hence, she is not entitled to get any interim maintenance. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the petition for maintenance and its rejoinder. The specific averment has been made in the petition with regard to the marriage and birth of a child out of wedlock of this petitioner. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to admit this application. Accordingly, this application is dismissed at the admission stage. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )