IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27322 of 2009 RAMESH RISHIDEO Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3/ 02.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that land dispute is there in between the parties, for which a super allegation of theft is added which is one of the non-bailable offences and next one is for assault caused by means of fersa but injury was found by hard and blunt substances that is also simple in nature. So, petitioner is entitle for anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 98 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)