IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2217 of 2010 MD.ASLAM S/O MD. AKHTAR HUSSAIN R/O VILL. AND P.O.- CHAKBAHAUDDIN, P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, SAMASTIPUR 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM COLLECTOR, SAMASTIPUR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, UJIARPUR, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM-APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PANCHAYAT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT 2006, UJIARPUR BLOCK, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 8. THE MUKHIYA-CUM-CHAIRMAN, PANCHAYAT TEACHERS SELECTION COMMITTEE, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ MALTI, UJIARPUR BLOCK, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SEWAK-CUM-SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT TEACHER SELECTION COMMITTEE, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ MALTI, UJIARPUR BLOCK, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 10. MD. JAVED AKHTAR S/O ABDUL GAFFAR R/O VILL. & P.O.- MALTI, UJIARPUR, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR ----------- 02. 03.12.2010 Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned order dated 17.11.2009 passed by the District Appellate Tribunal, Samastipur is based on error of record because order sheet of the appellate authority contained in Annexure-6 in relation to Appeal No. 522 of 2009 itself indicates that the matter was looked into by the erstwhile Block Development Officer and the matter referred for consideration in relation to appointment related to Gram Panchayat in question, which is Gram Panchayat Raj Malti. The preliminary ground for rejection of the claim of the petitioner seems to be that petitioner had not moved the Block 2 Development Officer at the relent time and the matter had not been referred to the authority. With the evidence having been brought on record in terms of Annexure-6, Anneuxre-9 is quashed. The matter is reemitted back to the respondents for a fresh consideration where all these facts will be brought to the authorities by the petitioner. The writ application is disposed of. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)