THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 5784 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad in R.A.No. 8 of 2008, dated 5.10.2009 confirming the order of the learned Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad in R.C. No. 126 of 2006, dated 15.11.2007 Brief facts of the revision are that: Respondent herein is the Petitioner-Land Lord and petitioner herein is the respondent-tenant in R.C.No. 126 of 2006 before the learned trial Court. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the trial Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. Petitioner-Landlord filed R.C.No.126 of 2006 under Section 10(2)(V) and10(3)(a)(i)(a) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, against the respondent seeking eviction of the respondent from the schedule premises. After hearing the parties and also after the trial, the learned Rent Controller has allowed the eviction petition and directed the respondent to vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the schedule premises to the petitioner-landlord. Aggrieved by the said order, the defeated tenant has preferred an appeal in R.A.No. 8 of 2008 before the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. The learned lower appellate Court after hearing both the parties, has dismissed the appeal confirming the order of the learned Rent Controller. Challenging the said order of the both the Courts below, the present revision has been preferred. At this stage, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed an undertaking vide U.SR.No. 1849 of 2009 and he is ready to vacate the schedule premises if one year time is granted. Recording the undertaking given by the petitioner, time is granted to the petitioner-landlord to vacate the schedule premises by 31st August, 2010. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 18.12.2009 CHV