(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Letters Patent Appeal No. 115 of 2009 (Against the order dated 13-8-2008, in Writ Petition No. 5995/2007) Subhash s/o. Murlidhar Deore, Age : 42 years, Occupation : Nil, At Post : Boris, .. Appellant Taluka : Dhule, (Original District : Dhule. respondent no.1) versus 1. Bhagwan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, N-6, CIDCO, Aurangabad, Through its Secretary. 2. The President, Bhagwan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, N-6, CIDCO, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad. 3. The Head Master, Bhagwan Primary School, Ajabnagar, Aurangabad. 4. The Education Officer (Primary), .. Respondents Zilla Parishad, (Nos.1 to 3 - Aurangabad. Original petitioners) 5. Ashok s/o. Kakasaheb Bade, .. Respondent no.5 Age : Major, deleted as per Occupation : Service, court's order dated Assistant Teacher, 15-6-2009. Bhagwan Primary School, Ajabnagar, Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad. (2) ....................... Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 and 3. Respondent no.2 served (Absent). Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate, for respondent no.4. ........................ CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 28TH JANUARY 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per A.P. Deshpande, J.) : 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against an interlocutory order passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby a Writ Petition filed by the school management has been admitted, and stay of payment of back wages has been granted, after securing an undertaking from the school management, that the employee / appellant would be reinstated. 2. The interlocutory order is discretionary and goes to adjust equities. Hence, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. (3) 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant then submits that in identical set of facts, two Writ Petitions were filed by the respondent no.1 / school management. However, one of the two petitions has been dismissed, whereas in the present Writ Petition, Rule has been granted. Hence, it is prayed that the learned Single Judge be requested to dispose of the Writ Petition at an early date. 4. Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances, we are of the clear view that expeditious hearing of the Writ Petition would subserve ends of justice. Hence, we request the learned Single Judge to decide Writ Petition No. 5995/2007 at an early date. 5. With these observations, the Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( A.P. DESHPANDE ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/lpa115