IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13896 of 2003 1. Patna Regional Development Authority through it Secretary, ‘C’ Block, 2nd Floor, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District Patna 2. The Secretary, Patna Regional Development Authority, ‘C’ Block, 2nd Floor, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District Patna………………………………………………………..………………Petitioners Versus 1. Kumari Ushabala, Daughter of Sri Baidyannath Jha, Flat No.107 2. Shashi Kant Jha, son of Sri Prabodh Narayan Jha, Flat No.102 3. Uma Shankar Prasad, son of Sri Chandrika Prasad, Flat No.202 4. Chanda Jah, wife of Sri Suresh Chandra Jain, Flat No.207 5. Ramawatar Agrawal, son of Sri Madan Lal Agrawal, Flat No.407 6. Matadin AGrawal, son of late B.D.Agrawal, Flat No.401 7. Nirmala Banka, Wife of Sri Santosh Banka, Flat No.406 8. Shakuntala, Wife of Sri Vishnu Kumar, Flat No.307 9. Awadhesh Kumar Sinha, Son of Late B.P.Verma, Flat No.201 10. Vijaya Priyadarshini, Wife of Dr. K.K. Choubey, Flat No.206 11. Prashant Kumar Jha , son of Late Prabodh Kumar Jha, Flat Nos.104 and 106 12. Prabir Kumar Jha, son of Sri Prabodh Narayan Jha, Flat No.101 13. Raj Kumar Gutgutia, son of Late Hariram Gutgutia, G.F-1 14. Sushil Kumar Singhania, son of late K.D. Singhania, Resident of G.F.2 15. Binod Kumar Jha, son of late Prabodh Narayan Jha, Flat No.105 16. Sushila Sinha, Wife of Sri R.A. Sinha, Flat no.205, All at present residents of Sri Laxmi Place Apartments, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, Town and District Patna….Respondents-Ist Set 17. The Appellate Tribunal, Patna Regional Development Authority, ‘C’ Block, 4th Floor, Maurya Lok Complex, P.S. Kotwali, Town and District Patna ………………………………...Respondent-2nd Set ----------- - 2 - 7 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Patna Regional Development Authority which is petitioner herein, is aggrieved by the order dated 12.11.2001 passed by the Appellate Tribunal, Patna Regional Development Authority, Patna on an appeal preferred by the respondents. The order of the Appellate Tribunal is Annexure-8. After going through the impugned order, this Court finds that the Tribunal has considered all aspects of the matter and has partly allowed the appeal of the respondents by condoning some of the deviations made by them in their flats whereas rest of the deviations have been directed to be rectified. This Court does not find any error in the order of the Appellate Tribunal. Accordingly, this Court does not find any merit in this writ application which is dismissed. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)