-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 385 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 385 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 385 OF 2007 Dr.Vasant Gopal Pandit, since deceased through LRs : 1A.Smt.Anjali Vasant Pandit & Ors. .. Petitioners. V/s. 1.Sushilabai Waman Kathavate (Expired) 2. Surendra Waman Kathavate & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/by T.D.Deshmukh for the Petitioners. Mr.P.S.Dani for the Respondent No.2. --- CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . Admit. Taken up for hearing and final disposal by consent. 2. After hearing the matter for some time, there appears to be no reason to interfere with the decree confirmed by the appellate court against the petitioners. The decree is based on the ground of bonafide need of one room tenement. There is nothing on the record to show that the respondent-landlord has any area in his possession. Hence, there is no reason to -: 2 :- doubt the requirement on the ground of bonafide need. The decree is not liable to be interfered with. 3. In the circumstances, there is no reason to entertain this civil revision application. The same is liable to be dismissed. Dismissed. 4. However, the respondents shall not execute the decree for a period of six months from today upon the petitioners’ furnishing the usual undertakings to this court to vacate the suit premises within a period of six months from today. The undertaking shall be filed within a period of two weeks from today, failing which the respondents shall be entitled to execute the decree. 5. The revision application is disposed of in the above terms. (S.A.BOBDE,J.) .....