CRM No.M- 5727 of 2011 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 07.07.2011 (i) CRM No.M- 5727 of 2011 (O & M) Chamkaur Singh and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents (ii) CRM No.M- 6017 of 2011 (O & M) Sher Singh and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN. Present: Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate, for Ms.Daljit Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners. (in CRM No.M-5727 of 2011). Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1 (in both the petitions) Mr.Arshedeep Singh Kler, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 5, (in CRM No.M-5727 of 2011). Mr.P.S. Brar, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CRM No.M-6017 of 2011). **** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of two connected petitions bearing CRM CRM No.M- 5727 of 2011 (O & M) ::2:: No.M-5727 of 2011 (O & M) and CRM No.M-6017 of 2011 (O & M). These two petitions have arisen out of cross-case having been filed by the parties against each other. In both the said petitions, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of FIR No.87 dated 01.10.2000 registered under Sections 326, 323, 324, 325, 148 and 149 IPC at Police Station Raikot, District Jagraon (Annexure P-1) on the basis of compromise between the parties. This Court while passing order in CRM No.M-5727 of 2011 on 23.02.2011 directed the learned trial Court to send a report with regard to the validity or otherwise of the compromise (Annexure P-2 in both the aforementioned petitions) after recording the statements of the concerned parties. Vide letters No.132 and 133 dated 05.05.2011, the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jagraon, has informed this Court about the genuineness of the compromise which is alleged to have been executed between the parties. Since both the parties have amicably resolved the dispute between them, therefore, in order to bring harmony in the society as per Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 these offences can be compounded. In view of the above, both the present petitions are hereby allowed and the FIR (Annexure P-1 in both the said petitions) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE July 07, 2011 sukhpreet