IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION Nos.24272, 26440, 26449, 28099 of 2008; 6743, 7912 and 10162 of 2009 W.P.No.24272 of 2008 Between: K.Dhathrik ..... PETITIONER AND The Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, rep. by its Vice Chancellor, Kukatpally, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.26440 of 2008 Between: T.Parthasarathi ..... PETITIONER AND Aurora’s Scientific Technological and Research Academy, Bandlaguda, Hyderbad 500 005, rep.by its Principal and others .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.26449 of 2008 Between: B.Shiva ..... PETITIONER AND Aurora’s Scientific Technological and Research Academy, Bandlaguda, Hyderbad 500 005, rep.by its Principal and others .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.28099 of 2008 Between: K.Dhathrik ..... PETITIONER AND The Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, rep. by its Vice Chancellor, Kukatpally, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.6743 of 2009 Between: B.Sandeep Goud ..... PETITIONER AND The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.7912 of 2009 Between: B.Naveen Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND The Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, Masab Tank, Hyderabad rep. by its Registrar, and others .....RESPONDENTS W.P.No.10162 of 2009 Between: Sravanthi Budamagunta ..... PETITIONER AND The Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, rep. by its Vice Chancellor, Kukatpally, Hyderabad and others .....RESPONDENTS COMMON ORDER: The petitioners in these writ petitions are the students of Engineering Course in different Colleges affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University and all the writ petitions are filed aggrieved by the action of the University in not permitting the petitioners to appear for the examinations on the ground of shortage of attendance. Since all the petitioners are similarly situated and a common question of law arises for consideration, these writ petitions are taken up for consideration and disposed of by this common order. When the matters are taken up for consideration, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents and admitted to by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue involved in these writ petitions is squarely covered by a judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.Nos.24114 of 2008 and batch, which were dismissed by a common order, dated 30.06.2009. In that view of the matter, following the judgment of this Court in W.P.Nos.24114 of 2008 and batch, dated 30.06.2009, all these writ petitions are also dismissed in terms thereof. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:21.08.2009 VGB