IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43780 of 2010 Maya Devi, wife of Raghunath Das, Resident of village Chaksaho, P.S. Patory, District Samastipur……………………………………………………….………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Kiran Devi, D/o Kunj Bihari Das, Resident of Pethia Gachhi Samastipur, P.S. + District Samastipur………………………………..……..Opposite Parties ----------- 2 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner is mother-in-law of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant was married with her son ten years back and they were living separately at Rosera where her son was earning his livelihood and there was some quarrel between them due to which the complainant left the place and has filed this complaint. This petitioner is not involved in any way as her son is living separately. He submits that petitioner who is an old lady is living in the 2 village and she has no control or connection with the complainant or her husband i.e. her son. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Petitioner (Maya Devi) shall appear before the court of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Complaint case No.403/2009 within four weeks from today and upon her appearance, the court below shall allow her bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)