1 40 cas 1605.10.doc k IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1605 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 786 OF 2006 Murlidhar Nivritti Devkar deceased, L.R. Smt.Sindhubai & Ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Laxman Dhondiba Margale & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Shrijeet Phadke for the applicants. Mr. Prasad Kulkarni i/b Mr.P.S.Dani for respondent nos.2 to 5. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 27/10/2010. PC: 1 Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2 By this Civil Application, the Applicants have prayed for substituted service on Respondent no.1 and 6. In so far as Respondent no.1 is concern, in paragraph 2 of the Application, the Applicants have stated that notice issued to Respondent no.1 returned unserved for want of proper/correct address. In view thereof, substituted service cannot be allowed. The Applicants will have to furnish proper/correct address of Respondent no.1 on or before 24.11.2010. 2 40 cas 1605.10.doc 3 In so far as Respondent no.6 is concerned, substituted service as prayed is granted. Applicants to publish notice in daily news paper “Pudhari” published from Pune and submit the compliance report on or before 22.12.2010. 4 In so far as Respondent no.1 is concerned, if proper/correct address is supplied within the stipulated time, issue fresh notice on the new address making it returnable within four weeks therefrom. 5 Civil Application is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)