IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 25425 of 2008 Between: Padmini Gopinathan, W/o. R. Gopinathan, Hindu, R/o. 5-1-95, Bazar Street, Santhpet, Chittoor. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vijaya Bank, M.G. Road, Secunderabad Rep. by its Branch Manager. 2 Vijaya Bank, ARM Branch, Babukhan Estate, 1st Floor, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Rep. by Authorised Officer. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any Writ or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in resorting to the Provisions of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Act and auctioning the property of the Writ Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unilateral, devoid of jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.S.GOPALA KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.25425 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) When the matter has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedies available under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH _____________________________ JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR 24th February, 2009 Kvr