IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3641 OF 2006 Balu Umdeio Pitekar ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. J.D. Khairnar, instructed by Vikas Shivarkar and Vipin Bidkar for the applicant. Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: H.S. BEDI , C.J. DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2006. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Concededly, the goods have been recovered from the petitioner. The maximum sentence imposable under Section 395 of the I.P.C. is ten years. The applicant has been in custody for the last eight months, having been arrested on 20th February, 2006. In the present case, the possibility of the trial being delayed cannot be ruled out. In view of the facts, the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail on conditions to be imposed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Khed, Pune. Application is accordingly allowed. CHIEF JUSTICE