1 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.80/2009 Amritlal & Anr. Vs. Ganesh & Ors. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.80/2009 Amritlal & Anr. vs. Ganesh & Ors. Date : 22.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sajjan Singh, for the appellants. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the appellants. The appellants are aggrieved against the order dated 4.12.2007 by which the trial court granted injunction to the effect that the appellants shall not alienate the property in dispute. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that no prima-facie case was made out by the plaintiffs and, therefore, no injunction should have been granted by the trial court. After going through the facts of the case, I am of the view that the appellants cannot be aggrieved against the stay order by which only they have been restrained from alienating the 2 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.80/2009 Amritlal & Anr. Vs. Ganesh & Ors. property in dispute which is in consonance with the principles of lis pendence and further by creating third party rights during the pendency of the suit, there is possibility of involvement of third party which may not be in the interest of both the parties. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya