Writ Petitic“n Petitioners 1 . nwu 10. 11. 12. “14. 15. HgATTISGAEH AT BILASPUR n “to. 158 of 2902 Mahadav Sonwani, Slo Shri Ganesh Ram Sonwani, aged about 42 years, R/o Mohan Nagar, Chirmiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Tarachand Sagan Sic Shri Chotelal Sagar, aged about 36 years, R/o Mohan Nagar, Chirmiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Gandhi Tandia, S/o Shri Latel Tandia, aged about 40 years, Rio Mohan Nagar, Chirmiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Ramsharan Gangey, s/o Vijay Ram Gangey, aged about 34 years, R/o Godaripara viilage, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Pyarela! Kuldip, S/o Shri Manglu Kuidip, aged about 41 years, Rio Gram Limtari, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Taniiai, Slo Shri Sadhram, aged about 41 years, R/o Chirimiri, Kapoor Singh Dafai, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Kheekram, S/o Shri Bhodhan, aged about 42 years, Rio Chirimiri, Kapoor Singh Dafai, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Reshamlal, sic Shri Shyamlai, aged about 42 years, Rio New Minus Qrr., Block No. 1/2 Chirimiri, Distt. Korea Neelkanth, S/o Shri Bohran, aged about 46 years, R/o Ekta Nagar, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Sevakram, Sfo Shri Dhanau, aged about 60 years, Dhamann, Dafai, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Raju Ganda, S/o Shri Maniram, aged about 3O years, Rio Ajad Nagar, Godripara, Chirimirt. Distt. Korea(C.G.) Devnandan, S/o Kaleshram, aged about 38 years, Rio Ajad Nagar, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) 13. Sudhram, Sio Chedu, aged about 42 years, Rio Otd Minus, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Krishna Kumar, S/o Shri Udat, aged about 26, years, Rio Ajad Nagar, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Jhadiram, Sio Jageshwar, aged about 30 years, Rio Old Godripara, Chirimiri. Distt. Korea (C.G.) Saiikram, S/o Kartikram, aged about 45 years, R/o Ekta Nagar, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Vishnu Prasad, S/o Shri Nathu Prasad. aged about 39 years, R/o Kapoor Singh Dafai, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Bahadur, S/o Deendayal, aged about 47 years, R/o Ekta Nagar, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Guman Lal, S/o Shri Sadhram, aged about 39 years, R/o Kapoor Singh Dafai, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Roshal Lai, S/o Shri Sadhram, aged about 24 years, R/o Kapoor Singh Dafai, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Maniram, S/o Nathuram, aged about 46 years, Rlo Kapoor Singh Dafai, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C G.) Jagatram, Slo Maleshrarn, aged about 25 years, R.o Doman Hiii, Chirimiri, Korea (C,G.) Ramcharit, S./o Shri Kholbehra, aged about 43 years, Rio Sonaoni, Chirimiri, Korea (area Vice President) Narayan, S/o Shri Mono, aged about 27 years, R/o Ajad Nagar, Godripara, Chirimiri, Distt. Korea (C.G:) Amrittai, S/o Shri Jagdish, aged about 28 years, RJo Kapoor Singh Dafai, Chirimiri, DisttKorea (C.G.) Ghans'nyam, S/o Khoibe'nra, aged about 38 years, R/o New Minus, Chirimiri, Korea (C.G.) Versus The State of Chhattisgarh Through - $ecretary, Department of General Administration, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Union of ihdia, Through Secretary, Tribai Deveiopment, New Delhi. Rashtriya Anusuchit Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jan Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jan Jati Ayog, Bharat Sarkar, 5t“ Floor, Loknayak Bhawan, New Deihi 110003 Adim Jati Anusandhan Sansthan (A ‘Govt. of Chhattisgarh Undertaking), Through its Director, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Development 16. 17. Respondents 20. 18. 19. 22. 23. 25. 24. 26. // Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 6. State of C.G ., Through~Tribal Weifare Dept, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETRTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF lNDiA SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Manindra Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Shri Manoj Paranjape, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri AS. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 5 and 6/State. O R D E R (Passed on this 26m day of June, 2097) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the Sonwani Community is represented through the petitioner No. 1. He has made a representation to the State Government for consideration of their case asto whether the community, which is purportedly “Ganda”, comes within the purview of Scheduied Tribes Community. He further submits that the representation was made long back, but the petitioners have not received any response till date. 2. The petitioners seek liberty of this Court to make detailed representation afresh to the State Government for consideration of their case in accordance with law, to which learned counsei appearing for the respondents No. 1, 5 and 6 has objection. 3. In view of the above limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the liberty is granted to the petitioners to make a detailed representation, raising all their grievances to the competent authority/State Government. in the event, the representation is made, the competent authority] State Government may consider the same in accordance with law, the policy of the Government and on its own merit, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this order. 4. With the above direction. the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihou-L BI- Judge