IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17760 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 21.09.2011 M/s Havens Properties Pvt. Limited .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioner has filed the instant petition challenging the orders dated 20.8.2004 and 22.4.2011 (Annexures P-11 and P-18), whereby its request for grant of licence for development of land measuring 32 Kanals has been rejected. While referring to the impugned order dated 22.4.2011, passed by the Director, Urban Estates, Haryana, Panchkula, learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that prayer of the petitioner for release of the land and grant of licence has been rejected by passing one sentence order that the application given by it for release of the land has been rejected by the Government after consideration. Learned counsel submits that now two CWP No. 17760 of 2011 -2- days back, the detailed reasons for rejecting the prayer of the petitioner have been communicated to it, therefore, in view of the fact the order passed by the Director is appealable under Section 19 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty avail the said remedy of appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the fact that initially a non-speaking order was passed by the Director and now detailed reasons have been given for rejecting the application of the petitioner, we relegate the petitioner to file appeal against the order of the Director, under the aforesaid provision. If the petitioner files any such appeal within two weeks from today, the appellate authority under the aforesaid Act shall consider and decide the same on merits, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant. We hope that the appeal will be decided expeditiously. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE September 21, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) ndj JUDGE