604 c» f'lo IN THE HIGH COURT OF OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR 5 W.P. N0. 1^7 /2004 IN THE MATTER OF PETITIONER ^A^^ ^>'^"". v'\^%^'" •-^^^' <^" A I M UNLVE R S ITY, Ra i pu r, established and notified'un.derthe Chhattisgarh Nizi Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Evam Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002, Sponsored by Triple 'A' Education Society, Raipur, registered under the C.G. Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 jn theofficeofthe Registrar.of Firms and Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur at S.No. 2749 through its Chancellor Amrendra Kumar Shrivastava, Tagore Nagar, Qpposite C.S.I.D.C. OffiCE', Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS • RESPONDENTS m ,. ^/^^rt-iWNf ,^^,^<*»« ile^urs.'si.ti W' '•ssy'^ M^ a'i,—- ,-'<^ laa S7ATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through the Principal S e c-reta ry/ S e creta ry, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) R e g u 1 a to ry C o m m i s s i ort Cohsti.tyjed under the Chhattisgarh Nizi Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Evam Viniyaman) Adhiniyam: 2002, C/o Rrincipal Secretary,; D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) '• -1:; » 1 liii.sn^TW I 'i!'R:iN?3n^?r 'garwBfN Anjaiii 3^B?raRTT, ®Tny'16,Rcliuy Sii^iMach *<I*IMI oiicn"" "" ' WI 200 ^5^""""""""" sn^T STcOW (Tf?ff D.B; HOH'BLE SIHU JUSTICE A HON'BI,ESHRIDlLIPRAOSAHt;BI®SHM(JKH,J 23.09.2003- None appears for fhe pe| Mr. Ravindra Agrawal, Chhattisgarh. Mr. Agrawal states tha^ had challenged the provisii Vishwavidyalaya (Sthpana Aui 2004 by which the Chhatti^ (Sthpana Aur Viniyaman) Adt judgment o{ Supreme Court in v._ Stategt Ckhattiseiarh and the. provisions of Vishwavidyalaya (Sthpana) Au been declared to be ultra virc this writ petition has beconle i: After considerinK the Agrawal, we find that this -m and we accordingly dispose of *|i|I<-<41.< IWRtfff feiJ iRf+^K. ^srf^ITSTI^T K.PATNAIK, C.J & itioner(s). P.L, has appeared for the State of in this writ petition the petitioner >ns of Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Viniysman) Sansodhan Adhiniyam, ^arh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya iniyam, 2002 was amended. By a the case of Prof.^ Yashpal andothers arwther repoi-ted in 2005 (5) SCC the Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 have 1s of the Constitution and therefore. lifructuous, ijubmission made by Mr. Ravindra ^it petition has become infructuous the same, Sd/- QuefJustice Judge ,,,pRaosahebDeshmu judge OitiP (^^l^) •]! i I