IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20600 of 2009 Date of Decision : July 12, 2010. Bhim Sain .....Petitioner versus Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Ltd. & anr. .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Tajender K.Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was appointed as a daily wager helper in the Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Limited at Sangrur w.e.f. 26.5.1990. It is alleged that he was illegally retrenched on 10.1.1991 which action of the respondents was successfully challenged by him before the Labour Court, Patiala, who vide its award dated 8.l2.1998 (Annexure P-1) directed the respondents to consider his claim for appointment against future vacancies. The petitioner was thereafter re-appointed w.e.f. 9.8.1999 but his services were again terminated in September, 2004. Meanwhile, it is averred that a policy decision dated 28.3.2003(Annexure P-6) was circulated, in terms whereof the services of the daily wagers like the petitioner ought to have been regularized. The C.W.P.No .20600 of 2009 2 petitioner alleges that he has been denied the benefit of the afore-stated policy in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner. It is alleged that the petitioner also challenged the subsequent termination order and the respondents are said to have conceded his claim. Be that as it may, the short grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition pertains to non-consideration of his claim for regularization of his services in terms of the Government Policy dated 28.3.2003 (Annexure P-6). The petitioner is said to have represented the authorities for regularization of his services vide representation dated 21.8.2009 (Annexure P-5) but no decision is said to have been taken or conveyed to the petitioner so far. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the petitioner's entitlement for regularization of his services, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 12, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE