IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.11 OF 2006 Shri Guno Vinayak Gaude .... Petitioner Vs. Government of Goa & Ors. .... Respondents Shri S.D. Padiyar for the Petitioner. Shri S.S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms L. Dharwadkar, AGA, for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: FEBRUARY 23, 2006 P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. The learned Advocate General states that the order dated 10-6-2005 passed by the Commissioner & Secretary (Panchayat) in Panchayat Petition No.7/99 is hereby withdrawn and the concerned authority will pass appropriate order, after hearing the parties. The said statement is accepted. In view of the said statement, the learned Advocate for the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Court if occasion arises and further requests for continuation of the interim order in the form of the prayer clause (d) which was granted on 2-2-2006. Needless to say that till appropriate order is passed by the competent authority and in case of the order being adverse to the interest of the petitioner, for a further period of two weeks from the date of service of the order upon the petitioner, the parties will have to maintain status quo in relation to the suit structure including that there should not be any release of electricity connection either in favour of the respondent No.3 or in the name of the respondent No.4. 2. The competent authority is expected to dispose of the petition as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of three weeks. With these directions, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.) sjs/223wp11.6