IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2372 of 2011 UMESH KUMAR PANDIT, SON OF LATE VIDHYA NAND PANDIT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHADEO MANTH, P.S. ANDHRA MANTH, DISTRICT MADHUBANI------------------------------------------------PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR---------------------------------------------------OPP. PARTY ----------- 2. 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 469 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that for being appointed as Routine Clerk in the Electricity Department the petitioner produced his educational certificate, which reflects the date of birth as 3.11.1968 in place of 3.11.1966. The same has also been verified. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no variation in the date and month but only variation was with regard to the year, in place of 1966 it was mentioned as 1968, which might be a bona fide mistake. It is further submitted that the petitioner was neither appointed on the basis of the said certificate nor any monetary benefit has been received by him. 2 Considering the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner Umesh Kumar Pandit, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Kotwali P.S.case No. 379 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.) Spal/