IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9701 of 2011 Date of Decision: May 30, 2011 Jangsher .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Respondent No.7, Jasbir Singh, has been appointed as Lambardar for village Chabotron, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nagar, by Collector, Yamuna Nagar, vide order dated 12.8.2009 (Annexure P-3) while taking into account the comparative merit of the contesting candidates. 2. Respondent No.7 is younger to the petitioner, more qualified being M.A. pass, whereas the petitioner is only 8th class pass. Respondent No.7 has also participated in development works whereas no such credit could be claimed by the petitioner. 3. Petitioner carried an appeal which has been CWP No.9701 of 2011 [2] dismissed vide order dated 28.10.2009 (Annexure P-4) by Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala. Revision filed by the petitioner has also been dismissed vide order dated 19.1.2011 (Annexure P-6) by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that at the appeal stage and subsequently at revisional stage, an issue was raised that the private respondent fabricated a ration card. 5. On a query of the Court, learned counsel has not been able to draw attention of the Court towards any document that conclusively shows that respondent No.7 has indulged in fabrication of record. There is no enquiry or enquiry report to that effect. I find that no such issue was raised before Collector that is the fact finding authority. 6. In view of better merit of respondent No.7, which has been considered by Collector, and order (Annexure P-3) has been upheld by appellate and revisional forums vide orders, Annexure P-4 and P-6, no ground for judicial review of impugned orders in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. 7. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) May 30, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?