WP(C) 536/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. BD Konwar learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. BL Sinha , learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the m aterials on record, I am, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties ap pearing before, inclined to dispose of the writ petition at this stage itself, w ith the following directions: The respondents, particularly, the respondent No.5, namely, Divisional Forest Of ficer, Nagaon Division, shall examine and consider the petitioner’s grievances, as expressed, in his representation Annexure-C to the writ petition, in the ligh t of the provisions of law contained in that behalf and dispose of the same by m aking a speaking order. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed with in a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 5, namely, Divisional Forest Officer, Nagaon Division. Until the time a final decision is taken on the said representation, as directed, hereinbe fore, Nakhula Beat Sand Mahal No. 4, shall not be settled with any one pursuant to the Short Sale Notice (Annexure-D to the writ petition), which was published on 28-01-2009.The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 5 a certified cop y of this order along with the copies of the writ petition and annexures thereto .