IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21805 of 2009 AMARJIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 12.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Of course, the F.I.R. was lodged against three unknown persons. The case relates to commission of robbery in the shop of the informant as also in the adjacent Bank. The learned Sessions Judge has enlisted several grounds appearing from the case records in support of the order rejecting the prayer for bail, one of them is that the petitioner is accused of seven criminal cases, many of whom are of identical nature. Petitioner is in jail custody since 2.2.2009. Looking to the materials available on the records as reflected from the impugned order, this Court rejects the bail application of the petitioner. The prayer for bail is accordingly, dismissed. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)