IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 12848 of 2006 Between: Syed Sabir Hussaini S/o. Syed Mahmood Hussaini Hyderabad, A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant City Planner, Circle No. III, M.C.H., Abids, Hyderabad. 3 The Special Deputy Collector, L.A.M.C.H. Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 4 Surendra Luniya S/o. Late Raja Indermal Luniya Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notice No. AA/1222/2005 dt. 23-6-2006 issued by the 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary null and void and also contrary to the spirit of the Division Bench Judgment in W.P.No. 6317 of 1996 dt. 15-3-2001 and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to pass Award by granting compensation to the petitioner in respect of his Premises No. 3-6-364/A, T.S. No.9, Block -M Ward No.55 Gaganmahal Village, Himayathnagar Mandal, Hyderabad District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.ZIA-UL-HAQ Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. The submission is placed on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 19th December, 2008 bcj