IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1339 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1339 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1339 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.8 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.8 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.8 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3082 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3082 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3082 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO.2802 OF 2005 SUIT NO.2802 OF 2005 SUIT NO.2802 OF 2005 Anil Hukumchand Bhatia .. Appellant V/s Ashokkumar Hukumchand Bhatia & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.H.Shah for the Appellant. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 28.04.2006. DATE : 28.04.2006. DATE : 28.04.2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellants undertakes to file Affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay caused in filing the Appeal. There is no inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)