IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.852 of 2008 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMP. LTD. Versus NAHIDA ANJUM & ORS ----------- 5. 9.9.2009 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in terms of the office notes dated 17.12.2007, he had prayed that notice on respondent No.7 should be accepted as valid on account of refusal by respondent No.7 and further the notice on respondent No.9 be issued only under ordinary process. It is submitted that learned counsel understood that the order dated 4.1.2008 had been passed in accordance with the office notes and the submissions made by him and the same was, accordingly, complied with by filing the requisites for ordinary process within four weeks time granted with respect to respondent No.9, but the actual order was that the memo of appeal shall stand rejected on non-compliance of the peremptory order date 4.1.2008. In the above circumstances the date for compliance of the order dated 4.1.2008 passed in Misc. Appeal No.482 of 2006 is extended to 16.9.2009 and accordingly, Misc. Appeal No. 482 of 2006 is directed to be restored to its original file subject to the compliance of the order dated 4.1.2008 within the extended period. The restoration application is allowed subject to the aforesaid condition. VPS (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)