HI$§% {JGURT $ CHHATTI$$ARH AT $EL§5PUR W. P.{5§ Na £541 a’f £00? Ps3?i?§amr= : Hari 5hank2r Pai‘eL 5/0 Nakui Frusad Patel} Aged about 49 ygars‘ Assisi-am Tanisha“ :9av1‘. Middta Sdmal Twapur BlacktRaigcir‘h Disirf. Raigqrh [6.6.] Vers'as Respanéems 1. S’rafe of Chhm‘fisgwh Thmugh:- Secreiar-y Educm‘ien aeparfmem, 3&5‘ Bhawan, Raipur (6,6,) Z. Tha Diracfm‘, Pubiic msfmcfim, 9&5. ghawan, Raigur ((153 /J. ‘ / 3. Jam? Diracfar’, Pub}ic Instrucfion Division, Raigarh (C.$.) 4. Assisfam' €emma‘ssioner Tribcsi Weifarg Eepaxrvfmem‘ Raigarh K5,} 5. Distric‘r Eéucafiar: Cfficer' Disif. Raigarh {C51 6. Bieck Educwan Gffimr aiack Raigarh Di5‘rf. Raigavh {ca} .55: Heri'biea Mr. Ju‘wee 5a€ish K. Agniiwiri, J Presenf: Mr. $anjay Pafel, Advocm‘e ‘For' fhe pei‘ifioner. Mr. Vinay Pmdey, Pane! Lawyer far 5%afe/r‘espandewsz GR55R (Passed on this 16‘“ Day of March, 2007”) 1. m2 pemianar mica uppainfed vide order da‘rzd 15.10.1986 (Annexure WE) as Assisi‘a‘m Teacher cm fixeé pay swig {3f §s. 3OG/-. Affer' campiei‘ica 0f ane yaw pmba‘fiari, he was gramed regular 39w ssaie af Rs. 545—9?5/=. 2. Leamed mama: @pewiag far fhe peiiiisnev submits fha‘t iha issue immlved in fhe case i$ asia whei‘her', ‘i‘ha pe’rifiwer is an‘rified 1'0 raguiar‘ @ b). pay sacks waif. The dm‘e of iaifia! afapavinfmenf or fram fhe dafe 61‘ c0mp!efion 5f pmbcfios'x periad. . Tha issue iravcived, harem wa: caris5derm by $he Madhya Pradash hife s Admwsfrafive TribumL Jaba§pur in GA. Ma. 23’452’59 {Madhukcm’r Yadu aad 56 whe‘rs Vs. 5‘w1'2 §f MP, é’i éfhers), whareia §f was haid ‘i'ha‘r #he simikzrbr‘ siwcd‘ad washers are eméfkd *m ragtdw {my 556% maf. #ha dafe 6f ini%ia! appaira?meiit The ma‘Her was ‘faken-up 4m fhe Han'bie Eap‘r’ema {Jaur‘r m Specie! Leave Pefh‘icn (Civ§£} No. 6892/93. Tha saié paifiw Wits dismisséé by i'he Hén'bk Supreme Caurf aphciéing fhe dacisim of fhe Tribuna! fa ‘rhe affecf fha‘f fhe Teachers/Assi$fmf Teechar‘s avg $fwh‘5ed w regubr pay swk f‘mm dew af iaah‘ia! appammam. . Learned cowse! appearmg for Tha peiificmr furfher $ubmifs fha? #Ns {hurt whiia cansiderim The same i$sue in Sushi§ Tiwari ¢$ m‘hers Vs. Sfafe $avf. m‘ Chhaffisgwh & o‘rhers‘ (WP. (5) No. 593’6 m‘ 2006) by sréer déhzd 7=11-20G6, hag gram-ac} Pagahr‘ pay scaie w.e.f. Tha dam m‘ mimd appaimmea‘r. . Learned caunsa! appaarmg for fhe par?ias joinfiy submif fhaf wig case 65 squarehx cavered by The decisioa of ‘rhis Cour? in Th2 case af 5&shil TSwar'i $1 afherg Vs. 8mm $av1‘. cf Chhaff5sgarh & a?hers (53pm). . 1‘11 wew af tha‘r ‘shis pei‘ifien is a5bwad in the 3mm ‘fér‘ms. Na arder as fa stasfs. 5 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri J Judge