A.O. No. 43/2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned judgment. This appeal has been preferred by the owner of offending Vehicle Maruti Van U.P. 07-E-4705, against the judgment and award dated 6-11-2008, passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/ District Judge Haridwar in MACT Case No. 120/2006, Javed Vs. Israr Ahmad and others. Perusal of record reveals that the accident in question was the result of collision of Truck No. HR 38-E-8167 and Maruti Van U.P. 07-E- 4705. The tribunal has recorded a categorical finding that the vehicles in question were going in opposite direction at the time of accident and both the drivers of the vehicles contributed the rash and negligence. The tribunal has fastened the liability upon the truck upto 70% whereas the ratio upon the Maruti Van was fixed upto 30% and in my view looking to the size of the vehicles in question, and facts and circumstances of the case, the ratio of rash and negligence fixed by the tribunal upon the offending vehicles, cannot be said to be unreasonable. I do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment and the same does not require any interference. The appeal is dismissed in limine. Let the statutory amount deposited before this court, be remitted to the tribunal concerned and the same shall be adjusted in the awarded amount of compensation. Dated: 08-04-2009 ( B.C. Kandpal, J. ) ISB