[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.160 OF 1998 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.169 OF 1996 Vinayaka Synthetics Limited .... Appellants Vs. M/s. Die Polyglass India Pvt. Ltd. .... Respondents Shri S.K. Jain i/b M/s. Vinod Mistry & Co. for the Appellants. Shri Sandeep Bhimekar i/b M/s. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED: JUNE 13, 2007 DATED: JUNE 13, 2007 DATED: JUNE 13, 2007 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. It appears that while dictating the order of 8th February, 2007 though the original petitioners were allowed to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the original respondents, while recording the same fact in the said order there was incorrect reference made to the parties. The order of 8th February, 2007, therefore, should read as under: "By consent, the impugned order is set aside with liberty to the respondents/original petitioners to withdraw the entire amount deposited by [2] the appellants/original respondents pursuant to the order dated 30th April, 1998 in Notice of Motion No.1628 of 1998 in full and final settlement of the claim of the respondents/original petitioners in terms of the notice dated 15th November, 1993. The Registry to release the said amount in favour of the respondents/original petitioners." Order accordingly. (Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J7a160.98 sjs/J7a160.98 sjs/J7a160.98