IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Contempt Case No. 1533 of 2008 And Writ Petition No.18789 of 2006 Contempt Case No.1533 of 2008 Between: Smt.Chinige Florence Nightingale W/o. G. Prabhakara Rao, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Deputy Director of Physical Education, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. R/o. Plot No.118, Sector 8, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam – 17. ... PETITIONER AND 1) Andhra University, Rep. by its Registrar, Sri P.V.G.D. Prasad Reddy, Visakhapatnam. 2) M. Syam Babu S/o. Late M. Krupa Rao, Deputy Director of Physical Education Unit, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MR. SATISH DESHPANDE Counsel for Respondent No.1: MR. M.V. RAJA RAM Counsel for Respondent No.2: MR. P.B. VIJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.18789 of 2006 Between: Smt.Chinige Florence Nightingale W/o. G. Prabhakara Rao, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Deputy Director of Physical Education, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. R/o. Plot No.118, Sector 8, M.V.P. Colony, Visakhapatnam – 17. ... PETITIONER AND 1 ) The Registrar, rep. by its Secretary, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. 2) M. Syam Babu S/o. Late M. Krupa Rao, Deputy Director of Physical Education Unit, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MR. SATISH DESHPANDE Counsel for Respondent No.1: MR. M.V. RAJA RAM Counsel for Respondent No.2: MR. P.B. VIJAY KUMAR The Court made the following: ORAL JUDGMENT: (per Shri Anil R. Dave, Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1) At the request of the learned advocate appearing for the applicant, case papers of Writ Petition No.18789 of 2006 were called for and the writ petition was taken up for hearing today along with the contempt case. 2) The learned advocate appearing for the applicant, Shri Satish Deshpande has submitted that he has received written instructions from the applicant for withdrawal of the contempt case as well as Writ Petition No.18789 of 2006. In support of this submission, he has filed a copy of letter dated 24.7.2009 addressed by the petitioner to him before the Court. The said letter is taken on the record of the contempt case. 3) Looking to the facts of the case, the writ petition and the contempt case are disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ November 20, 2009 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J svs ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA { }