IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7505 OF 2008 Kashinath Dula Lavate & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Manisha urf Bharati Dhanaji Gole & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Surel S.Shah for Petitioners. Mr.V.S.Talkute for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 31, 2009. MARCH 31, 2009. MARCH 31, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The order impugned in this Petition is essentially a discretionary order passed by the Court below. The Court below has recorded good reasons for showing indulgence to the Respondents to carry out amendment in the pleadings. Assuming that some error of jurisdiction has been committed by the lower Court, it is not as if the same cannot : 2 : be corrected at a later stage. The Petitioners would be free to agitate those matters in the revision or appeal to be filed against the final decision of the Trial Court. All questions in that behalf are left open, following the observation of the Apex Court in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, in particular, Paragraph 39 of the said decision. No interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.