IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-4435 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 17, 2010 Rakesh Tyagi .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.164 dated 31.10.2007 under Sections 302, 307, 392, 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered with Police Station, Mullana, District Ambala. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been in custody for more than 2 years and his case is at par with that of co-accused, Pardeep Kashyap who has been allowed bail. I have considered the contentions. Crl. Misc. No. M-4435 of 2010 [2] A reference to the order passed by the Court of Sessions in regard to prayer of bail on behalf of the petitioner shows that during investigation, it was found that the petitioner reached the spot and took the assailants away so as to facilitate their escape from the place of incident. It has further been observed that most of the prosecution witnesses have already been examined. Apart from the present case, the petitioner is involved in a number of other cases of serious nature and therefore, there is likelihood of the petitioner absconding. Considering the above, I find no ground to allow bail to the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) February 17, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?