FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Nanded Civil Application No. 6041 of 2009 (Writ Petition No. 1123 of 2009) (The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nanded, & another Vs. Vidyavati Shankarrao Deshmukh & others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 24TH JULY 2009 1. Heard Mr. V.S. Panpatte, learned Counsel appearing for the applicants (respondent nos.2 and 3 in W.P.). 2. The interim order, which was passed by this court on 31st March 2009, was passed after hearing the learned Counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 in the petition (present applicants). Not only this, but the court had also Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders perused the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the present applicants. 3. It is not the case of the applicants, that the material which is sought to be placed on record, could not have been placed on record at the time of admission of the matter, if due diligence was exercised. Since the application is not based on any events which occurred after passing of the order dated 31st March 2009, we do not find that a case is made out for entertaining the application. 4. Civil Application is, therefore, rejected. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/ca6041