IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MCA No.66,67 & 68 OF 2010 In Second Appeal No.42 of 2008 Mr. Victor Monteiro and another .... Applicants V e r s u s Mrs. Sebastiana Monteiro & anr. ..... Respondents Mr. P. Lotlikar, Advocate for the Applicants/Appellants. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Respondents no.1 to 5. Coram: N.A. Britto, J Date: 17th March, 2010. P.C: Heard. 2. Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are represented by Advocate D. Pangam. 3. Mr. P. Lotlikar, Advocate for the applicants submits that respondents no.6(a) and (b) have been duly served, but they have not put their appearance. 4. Respondent nos.7(a) and 7(b) have not been served. Shri Lotlikar states that notices issued to them earlier were returned unserved, for want of proper addresses. Counsel submits that the applicants/appellants do not have their complete addresses and, therefore, notices to them be issued by publication. 5. Counsel also submits that Respondent no.8 and 13 have expired and that the names and addresses of the legal heirs of Respondent no.8 and 13 will be submitted to the Court within a period of two weeks. 6. Counsel further submits that respondents nos. 14(a) and 14(b) have been served. That notices to respondents nos 7(a), 7(b), 9 and 12 be issued by publication. 7. Let notices to respondents nos.10,11(a) and (b) be issued at addresses given in MCA no.66 of 2010. 8. All notices returnable in the first week after summer vacation. 9. Stand over to 9/06/2010. 10.MCA nos.66/2010 and 67/2010 shall stand disposed of, accordingly. N.A. Britto, J Ap/-