HgQ§~§ 80H??? Q? @%§%§£??§3G§Rh§ K? QELiASPkjR EWE§§QN E£N~3§-§ Q3R§Mi §§QNELE $HR§ RglnEEE‘ui GE?TA9 $.é‘ @a §€€3NELE $¥§R§ $UN§L K¥JM§R $§M§§Ag J” Wfii Peéi'iiaaw wa. “$2W2QQ1 WQK PE?§T%{§N HE‘égER £RTEQLE3 226322? QF 'i'HE ‘CGN$TETUT§Q§\§ 03:“ iNwA :3resan'ii Shri Sanjay K. Agrawa: & Suéwp Agrawai Eeamed oeunse! faa’ the petitioner ?ET§?§€3NER : Linkwn Coal & Mimrals Pvi. Ki, a campany incerperaiai undef the indian Campanies Act W53, having its Haad Office a? 4i“ Fkmr, Punam Piaza, CM! Lines, wAGPgR Thmugh Pawer of Attorney Hol§e¥ Anand Chaiurwadi, S/o Lama Pfasad, ageé‘ét? years, R/a, Sundaai' Nager, NAGPUR {Mah.) wER$U§$ RES?Q%&E§E?§?§ x . 4h Siaie of Chhafiisgarh, Thmugh £‘Is Secremry, Departmem 0f Faregt. QAf3U§ (Chha‘t"§sgar‘n) 2. Chief Cmserva’iar 0f Faresig ( ?rec§ucti0n), Jag Raad, RgiPUR (Chhattisgarh) 3. Comewa’cor of Faresi, EEURG (Chhattisgarh) 4‘ Divigiona! Forest Offiser, KHARAGARH (Chhafz‘isgarh) 5. mien‘iai Bank of Commerce, ”Through Branch Manager, “Muniaza Marga" Gandh§ gagh NAG9UR (Mam Shri N.K. Agiawat .‘eameci Deputy Advbcate Genera! for the Staiel’ respondents No. 1 to 4. ORBER {23“ January, 2G6§§ The ‘faibwing ordgr o? éhe Caur’: was paweé by Ragga @wm‘g, ad“ $hri NK. Agrawa}, ieamad Depuiy Advocate Generai fefamng 4:0 the facts nawafed in LA N0. 4140/2001 wbmitéed mat the writ petiticn‘ new has became inhmtuous a$ th€ add§tianai quantity of bambce whish the peiiiianer was requirgd ta hi: haS akaady been sow at em higmr ram man “the ane quomd b3, the peiiimner m mmpliance 07" ihe inferim zyder daied 1293—2301 . V 2. Shri Sam‘ay {< Agrawah learned coanee§ fer ihe peritmner, m wew of ’me abcve submission a“? Eeameai Depu‘ty Acmcate Genera seem pefmisgion TO wiéhdfaw fhe writ petiticn wkh the iberéy e? fiiing another writ petitiom, if ihe fu’zure develagmemg 3e warfw n-L §i. 3‘ Per deems”: graniea. 4. 3mm the abcve iieem, fhe wr§% peéEiEan §e dismiseed as; wt I \ sd/_ fiSunil Kumar Sinhaf I) Judge mmmi