1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.566 OF 2010 CGU Logistic Limited ..Petitioner. Vs. M.S.Rao (Income Tax Officer – 1(1)(2) Mumbai and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. Soli S. Dastur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nishant Thakkar, Ms. Shweta Diwan, Ms. Amruta Mehta and Mr. Kannan Thever i/b Mulla & Mulla & CBC for the Petitioner. Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Respondents. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. 15th March, 2010. P.C.: Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned counsel and at their request, the matter is taken up for hearing and final disposal. The Petition is directed against an order dated 23rd February, 2010 passed by the Income Tax Officer 1(1)(2), Mumbai declining to grant a stay of the recovery of a demand. The demand 2 pertains to Assessment Year 2007-08. During the course of the hearing of the Petition, the Court has been informed that the Petitioner has completed its submissions in the appeal which was filed against the order of assessment and the final orders are awaited. In that view of the matter, the only appropriate order to pass in these proceedings would be to direct that until the CIT(A) passes final orders in the appeal and for a period of four weeks from the date of the service of the order, the Respondents shall not enforce the demand which forms the subject matter of these proceedings viz. for Assessment Year 2007-08. There shall be an order in these terms. No further directions are necessary. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)