Civil Writ Petition No.1101 of 2011 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.1101 of 2011 Date of Decision:-14.09.2011 Risal Singh Khara. ......Petitioner. Versus State Bank of Patiala & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Karan Nehra, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate for the Respondents. *** HEMANT GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Learned Counsel for the respondents states that after considering the objections filed by the petitioner under Section 13(3A) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), the bank is yet to issue notice under Section 13(4) of the Act. It is further pointed out that after notice under Section 13(4) is issued, the petitioner shall avail remedy under the Act to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal. In view of the said fact, we find the writ petition to be premature as the bank has not issued notice under Section 13(4) of the Act Civil Writ Petition No.1101 of 2011 #2# which alone will give right to the petitioner to avail statutory remedy. Dismissed with liberty to avail statutory remedy after notice under Section 13(4) is served upon the petitioner. ( HEMANT GUPTA ) JUDGE ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE September 14, 2011 Vinay