IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-25674 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 3.8.2011 Balwinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Proxy counsel for Mr.P.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.B.S.Teji, Sr.DAG, Punjab. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. Crl.Misc.No.40294 of 2011 is allowed. Affidavit is taken on record. A perusal of the affidavit shows that its contents are totally vague when they are seen in the backdrop of the plea of the State who have stated that they are not calling the petitioner to the police station frequently. They have specifically stated that only on two occasions i.e.on 30.7.2009 and 7.2.2010 he was called in the police station. The petitioner in fact has given a complaint to the police that some of the persons arrayed as respondents No.9 to 11 are not returning his amount. In the backdrop of the aforesaid facts when Crl.Misc.No.M-25674 of 2010 (O&M) -2- the petitioner has alleged that he is being harassed and the respondents have denied the same, and in view of the vague averments in the affidavit, in which no specific dates have been mentioned, I am of the opinion that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be exercised in favour of the petitioner. Dismissed. 3.8.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss