IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29760 of 2011 Sukhdeo Mandal & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ----------- 2 25.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.1 who happens to be a dealer under P.D.S. Scheme and others three who have been booked in a case registered under Section 7 of the E.C. Act bearing Marauna P.S. Case No.39 of 2009 have prayed for quashing of the cognizance order dated 28.07.2011 on the ground that the alleged occurrence is of dated 01.09.2007 while the seizure happens to be of dated 03.09.2007 and the case has been registered on 04.09.2007. Apart from this also referred Annexure-4, and inspection report dated 04-09-2007 submitted by Block Supply Officer, Marauna to S.D.O., Nirmali wherein petitioner no.1 has been exonerated. The aforesaid event is out of consideration for the present stage and therefore, the order impugned cannot be interfered with. Accordingly, petition is found to be devoid of merit and is rejected. However, the learned lower court, if such prayer is made on behalf of the petitioner at an appropriate stage, will see and decide without being influenced by the order impugned. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)