IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 261 of 2008 Rajesh ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ……. Respondents ……. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for the State. …… Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. After hearing the arguments of Mr. B.M. Pingal, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent no.1, I am convinced that the documents annexed with the petition, prima facie, do reveal that the offences have been committed. 2. No interference by this Court is called for while exercising jurisdiction U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 25.04.2008 A