u gmlgwyggy um “*5 IN THE HIGH COURT C? MADE-KWK PRADESH AT JRB3kLPU' 67 Ram Sahu s/o $adhuram Sahu about 42 yzears, Peon, Krishi Mandi, burg. 2. Brijnandan Prasad Shanna s/o Ramkrishna aget‘i about 45 years, Peon, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Dur'g. 3. Premlal Joshi s/o Sheocharandas Satnami ageé about 42 years, Peon, Kriskg Upaj Manoi, Durg. 4. Ramdas Manjkpuri s/o .mludas, aged aE’out 38 years, Peon, Krishi‘ Upaj Mandi, Durg.v. 5. Hemshankar T‘nakur s/o mari Raruha Singh Thakur, 36 years, Peon, Krishi Upaj Mandi, ,Durg, u V/s ESPGNDENTS 1. Krishi Upaj Mandi, Durg. §'$/‘*' Through we Secretary, . Krishi Upaj Mandi, Burg. ‘5 ’ 2; Krishi President. Upaj Mancii, Durg. Q 9 3. Awadha Ram oi i? 4. Madhav Ram Sahu «'5. Prahlaa Singh Chauhan. 125 6. Bishal Ram Shanna K 5 7. Ram'Kishore Chandrakar. g} 8. Thukel Ram Netam. K > 9.. Sanjay Diiliwar. #10. Bharat Lal Wogre. Respondents 3 to 10 daily wgges Peon. recentlypromotea as Nakeder’‘, Krishi' Upaj Mandi, Darg. Law ”1 Mn ‘ ” R. :9 — . . ' R XI-HC—78 23.9w. Maw/3 mnim un-‘a nu...” W200 m me:m (W) matww aansnéwm mmmaanéar , ’ ‘ mwm'#wmw $Wm21 ‘ 5.9.2005 None for the petih‘ Respondent No. 1 y Shri Ranbir Singh, Advocate. Learned counsel the Respondent No.1 submits that x . an a$davit has been by Shri Jagdish Lal Sawanni, Secretaxy, Krishi Upa andi Samiti, Durg and O$cer~in- Charge of the case, on alf of the Respondent No.1 to the . eeect that the Respond nt No.1 has teceiv'ed aEdavits of petiu'oners to the $ t that they me not intexested to pmsecute the petition. The affidavits of the petitioners are ~ $6d hnn page No. 3 to 10\i.e. Ramdas Manikpuri, Shn' Udal Ram Qahu, Shri Brij n Prasad Shanna, and Shri Premlal Joeh1 pettloners No 4 1 2 and 3 lespecmrely It 1s stated that the petmoner No 5 Shn Hemshankar Thakur has died m the meanhme. When the matter as taken up for hearing on the last DEI‘S. - Sdl~ SATISH K. AGNEHOTRI z Judge r j M h w n a