IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.P.(M) No. 1180 of 2010. Decided on November 9, 2010. Vishesh Kumar …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ..Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner Sh. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondent Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. AG. Surjit Singh, Judge (Oral) Petitioner is involved in a scam of bogus examinations of Class 8th, 10+1 and 10+2. As per police report, there are few Tuition Centres, which, behind the facade of providing tuitions, arrange for bogus examination of candidates, for the aforesaid classes and on the basis of those bogus examinations, candidates are declared pass. Money is charged for arranging bogus examination and certificates of passing those examinations from H.P. Board of School Education. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. Role, attributed to the present petitioner is that he was one of the candidates, who took bogus examination, at Tuition Centre for 10+1 examination and obtained bogus certificate. 3. Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, as also learned Assistant Advocate General and gone through the police report and record. 5. Certificate, has not been recovered, so far. Also, the offence is of very serious nature, which has affected the entire society and has caused loss of faith in the system of examination, conducted by the State School Education Board. Looking to the gravity of the offence, I do not think this to be a fit case for exercising the discretion, in the matter of grant of anticipatory bail, in favour of the petitioner. So, the application is rejected. November 9, 2010 (PC). (Surjit Singh) Judge.