.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.438 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1012 OF 2007 Sushma Sharad Ayare and 2 others. ..Petitioners. -Versus- The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ..Respondent. .... Mr.S.K.Talsania, Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.Dinesh Pednekar, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.C.U.Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.S.M.Mondle, Adv. for the respondent. .... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The relief sought in the Notice of Motion is of substantial nature and it is the very relief sought in the main Petition. It is not possible to grant relief in the Notice of Motion at this stage and it would be proper to decide the main Writ Petition. 3. Liberty to move for fixing the Petition for final hearing after Summer Vacation of 2009. Pendency of this Petition will not come in the way of .{2}. the petitioners for applying pursuant to any advertisement issued by the respondent - Corporation and the respondent - Corporation shall consider the same as per Rules. In case the Rules provide for relaxation of age for such candidates the same shall be considered by the respondent - Corporation. 4. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]