1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2037 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2037 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Gunale for Petitioner. He contends that even legal heirs of Respondents who were already dead on the date of institution of proceeding in 2004 are allowed to be brought on record and delay has been condoned mechanically just for asking. 2. Perusal of impugned order condoning delay by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal shows that M.R.T. has accepted the contention that revision applicant before it were residing elsewhere and hence had no knowledge of deaths. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has attempted to contend that there were several matters and in other matters the legal heirs were brought on record and hence fact of death as also names of legal heirs were within the knowledge of respondents. No reply 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2037 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. filed before M.R.T. pointing out these assertions is produced before this Court. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:22/03/2011. ans/2037