HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.PETITION NO. 3973 OF 2010 Date: 30.04.2010 Between: Syed Khaja Habeebuddin and another …..Petitioners And: The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By Its Public Prosecutor and another. …..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.PETITION NO.3973 OF 2010 ORDER: The 2nd petitioner/A-2 is daughter-in-law of the 2nd respondent/defacto-complainant. The 1st petitioner/A-1 is father of the 2nd petitioner. They are accused of offences punishable under Sections 424, 323, 420, 448, 120-B, 506/34 I.P.C. in Crime No.89 of 2010 of Narayanaguda Police Station, Hyderabad. Private complaint filed by the 2nd respondent was referred to the police for investigation and report under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that this complaint was filed by the 2nd respondent as a counter blast for case filed by the 2nd petitioner against him and his family members for offence under Section 498-A I.P.C etc., and with a view to wreck vengence. It is alleged that A-1 and A-2 came to residence of the complainant on 04.02.2010 at about 9.00 A.M and forcibly entered into house of the complainant and started using abusive language against the 2nd petitioner’s husband and also the 2nd respondent and other family members and they pushed the complainant physically and forcibly and hit his family members. It is contended that the 2nd petitioner being daughter-in-law of the same house, she is entitled to come in the house along with her father and it cannot be termed as trespass. When there are bitter feelings between the parties and then there is a case under Section 498-A I.P.C is pending between the parties, it is not known what prompted the petitioners to come there and commit the alleged acts in that house. Truth or falsity of allegations in the complaint is a question of fact which this Court cannot go into 2) Hence, the petition is dismissed. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDA RAJULU,J. Date: 30.04.2010. KSH