IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2011 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 OP(C).NO. 4147 OF 2011(O) --------------------------------------- OS.104/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, RANNI PETITIONER: -------------------- MUHAMMED KUNJU, S/O.HAMEED RAWTHER,AGED 61 YEARS, DOCUMENT WRITER, THYPARAMBIL HOUSE,VAIKOM MURI, MANDIRUM P.O,RANNY VILLAGE BY ADV. SRI.P.HARIDAS SMT.S.SIKKY SMT.LIJI KUTTAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. JENOVA @ BALA, W/O.SURENDRAN,AGED 46 YEARS, DOCUMENT WRITER,PALANIKUNNATHIL,THOTTAMON MURI, RANNY VILLAGE 689 672 2. SAROJINIAMMA, W/O.KARUNAKARAN,BUSINESS, PALANILKUNNATHIL,THOTTAMON MURI, RANNY VILLAGE 689 672 THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P(C) NO.4147 OF 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO.104/2011 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT,RANNY EXT.P2 REPORT DATED 30.05.2001 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN O.S. 104/2011 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT RANNY EXT.P3 INJUNCTION APPLICATION FILED IN O.S. 104/2011 OF THE MUNSIFFS COURT,RANNY RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== O.P(C) No.4147 of 2011 ==================================== Dated this the 16th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Plaintiff in O.S. No. 104 of 2011 of the court of learned Munsiff, Ranny is the petitioner before me. The suit is for a decree for temporary injunction against forcible eviction. Petitioner claims that he is a tenant of the second respondent. Case of petitioner who is a document writer is that respondents are trying to forcibly evict him from the building owned by the second respondent for not obliging to certain demands of the first respondent. Petitioner has filed an application for temporary injunction in May, 2011. It is submitted that the Advocate Commissioner submitted report but so far, learned Munsiff has not disposed of the said application. Petitioner apprehends his dispossession at any point of time. Hence it is requested that a direction may be given to the learned Munsiff to dispose of the application for temporary injunction (Ext.P3) as early as possible. 2. Having regard to the circumstances stated learned Munsiff, Ranny is directed to dispose of Ext.P3, application after preliminary steps are over and if there is no legal impediment in doing so, as early as possible. Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv