IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2008 / 16TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 12130 of 2008(R) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. K.V.JOSEPH, KOIKKARA HOUSE, CMC 10/23, CHERTHALA -388524. 2. ANTONY P.J., PULLOORITHIKARI, CHERTHALA. 3. MARYKUTTY KURIAKOSE, CHAKKALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, CMC 124/23, CHERTHALA. 4. M.P.CHANDRAN, MATTATHIL HOUSE, CMC 161/23, CHERTHALA. 5. G.JAYAKUMAR, PRESIDENT, KERALA VYAPARI VYAVASAI EAKOPANA SAMITHI, CHERTHALA UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI.G.JAYAKUMAR, G.S.MANDIRAM, CMC 23, CHERTHALA. 6. REV.FR.SEBASTIAN, VICAR, MUTTAM ST.MARY'S FORANE CHURCH, CHERTHALA. 7. V.J.ANTONY, VELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERTHALA. 8. S.TAGORE, TAISHILA WARD NO.10, CHERTHALA. WPC No.12130/2008 -2- 9. BABU MULLANCHIRA, MULLANCHIRA HOUSE, WARD NO.23, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.LAL GEORGE SMT.ANN SUSAN GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD, RAILWAY BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2. GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, NEW DELHI. 4. CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHERTHALA. 5. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLEPPEY. R1 TO R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.JAMES KURIAN. R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.12130 of 2008-R ------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 7th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. After arguing the matter for quite some time, Sri.Lal George, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach this Court, if need arises in future. 2. The request of the learned counsel appears to be reasonable, and if it is granted, it would not cause prejudice to the respondents. Therefore, we dispose of this writ petition as withdrawn. 3. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners, if they so desire, to approach this Court, if need arises in future. 4. All the contentions of both the parties are left open. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE MS