IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.686 of 2009 KRISHNA MOHAN SINGH SON OF SARZOO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NAGWA, P.O.- SAHPURA, P.S. MANER, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PATNA DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 5. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SASARAM CIRCLE, SASARAM, DISTRICT- ROHTAS 6. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, HILSA, DISTRICT- NALANDA 7. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ARRAH, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR 8. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 9. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 8 01.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ application the retiral dues have been paid save and except that he has not been paid the part of the provident fund dues for the period 1976-77, 1978- 79 and 1996-97 and till the date of retirement. It is further submitted that the benefits of the time bound promotions grated to him in the year 1987 have not been given which is adversely affecting his claim of retiral dues. It is also submitted that the salary for some period has not been paid to the petitioner while working as a Co-operative Extension Officer at Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas. Learned counsel for the State submits that as regards the payment of pension and the gratuity the sanction has already been sent to the Accountant General. Learned counsel appearing for the Accountant 2 General submits that if the authorization for payment of pension and gratuity has not been issued till date the same shall be issued without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation giving specific claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and admitted dues along with statutory interest could also be paid to the petitioner. The authority while considering the matter shall also consider with regard to payment of over all interest on account of the alleged delayed payment provided relevant details in support of such claim are furnished by the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)