IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 29762 of 2008(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- C.K.JACOB, S/O. KORA, CHIRAYILHOUSE, VELOOR KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. SALE TAX OFFICER, II CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.29762 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by proceedings under Section 65 of the Revenue Recovery Act. He has approached this court earlier and Ext.P6 judgment resulted. This court directed that inquiry be held and petitioner to file supplementary objection. Complaint of the petitioner is that no final decision has been taken. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that apparently an order has been passed on 28.7.2008. But it is also pointed out that, it is returned unserved. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: The order will be served on the petitioner if the petitioner approaches the first respondent within two days of the receipt of a copy of this judgment. Thereafter it is for the petitioner to work out his remedies. In order to facilitate the same, the petitioner will not be arrested pursuant to the order on the basis of Section 65 proceedings for a period of one month from today. I have not pronounced on the issue raised in the writ petition. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb