IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1882 of 2007 MOST.DULARI DEVI & ORS Versus MD.MOTIUR RAHMAN & ANR ----------- 2 31.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order allowing amendment in plaint does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. All that was sought to be amended was only with regard to identification and description of plot number of the suit property. Such amendment being only explanatory or clarificatory in nature, is permissible within the scope of Order-VI Rule-17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The next submission that such amendment was capable of taking away certain admission made in the evidence of the plaintiff is also untenable specially when such plea was not even raised by the petitioner in his rejoinder to the amendment petition. The only plea which had been raised in the rejoinder apart from the delay was that the nature of the suit would change in the event amendment was allowed. There is however nothing on record to show nor it has been argued by the Counsel for the petitioner that the nature of the suit could change on account of the proposed amendment. 2 That being so, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order and accordingly this application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)