'nsns s: nEf-ssi! •aHyi.E Is^Si.1 C r (OQ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S 1NO. '^^^-4-- /2006 PETITIONER ..••\1>>.> .:•' a!y ..••^••' /' <^lx./ ^y f^€?' ^ .,^^: ^" Smt. Anita Ohri wife of Gurudit Ohri, aged about 45 years, R/o HIG 89 Maharana Pratap Nagar Kosabadi Korba(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS <3^v\ 1. State of C.G., through the Secretary Department of School Education Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Raipur , 4. Principal Government Girls Higher Secondary School Balco Korba (C.G.) TO, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *11*1MI Sh*11<ft ?s?anin^pT, »T(1wi6,Rioiyy . 0).P. 0s-1 ~l'i<"7l0^ . • ••• W( 2tt0 •an^i^irfew sraCTW ^' 3<i^i ><a«n wnwHfersn^T 8.1.2007 Mr. Ajay Shrivostuv^i, Shri A.V. Shreedhar and Shri H.5. Ahluwalia, Advocates for th4 petitioners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, D^puty Sovemment Advocate for the 5tnte/respondents. With the consent ofl matt'er is heard finally and c^isposed of. Order dictated in op4;n Court in W.P. (s) No. 7426 of 2006, passed .separatety. A copy of this order writpetitions. »i<i[ci<(1-(*iiH(iVfftei<Jl <Ki*<;it ^Tsrf^ffa.n^r leamed counsel for the parties, the |3e placed on record in other connected SdA Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O: ^ HI6H COURT OF CHH/tTnSfiARH AT BIL4SPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATTSMIC. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETTHON (5.1 N0. 7426 OFM06 Petitioner ReSDondents versus Dinbcndhu Bharti The State of Chhattisgnrh ond onoiher WRTT PETTnON fS.l N0. 7427 OF 2006 Petitioner versus Respondents Ramnarayon Prodhan State of Chhattisyirh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 7428 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Smt. Monju Khujur State of Chhattisgarh and others WRFT PETTTION (S.) N0. 7429 OF 2006 Petitioner Itesoondents versus Krishna Kumar Oxmdra State of ChhattiS3arh and others WRTT PETTHON fS.l N0 7430 OF 2006 Petjtjoner Resoondents versus ^iivnand Rathore State of Chhatl-isgarh ond o+hers WRrr pETmoN rs.i N0.7431 OF 2006 Petjtipnec Resoondents versus Ram Chandro Namdeo State of Chhatl-isgarh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0.7432 OF10% ^\ Petitioner Reaiondents versus Smt. Sharoda Sahu S'tate of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0.7433 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Ohanimlal Rathore State of Chhattisgarh ond o-Hiers WRTT PETCTTON (5.1 N0.7434 OF 2006 Petitioner versus Resooncfents Smt. Mary Groce. Minj State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETTTION (S.V N0.7435 OF 2006 Petitioner Reaiondents verais Sfflt. PurnimaPandey Sttxte of Chhatl'iS9arh cmd olhers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7436 QF 2006 Petttioner versus Rewondents Lakhanlal Joiiswnl Stoite of Chhattisgarh and others WR3T PETmON (5.) N0.7437 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Hamamyan Patel State of Chhattisgarh <md others WRFT PETTTION (s.t NO 7433 OF 2006 Petitioner Re«}ondents verws Manoj (Cumar Pandey State of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETTTrON (S.) N0.7439^E10GM5 ^> Petitioner Respondents versus Indra Kumar Tivrori State of Chhatt-isgarh cnd others WRFT PETTTION (5.1 N0.7440 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Keriiri Kishore Dubey State of Chhatfisgarh and others wprr pETrrroN (s.) N0.7441 OF 2005 Petitioner Respondents versus Loixman Pnxsad Rathore State of Chhattis9nrh ond others WRrr PETTHON (5.1 N0.7442 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt. Seeta Sharma versus Respondents Stcrte of Chhattisyirh cnd others WRTT pErmoN (s.i N0.7443 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents verais Chandra Kumar Sharma State of Chhaftisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7444 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Sonpsv Kumar Sharma 5+ate of Chhattisgarh cnd others WRITPETmON (5.1 N0.7445 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoonctents versus Phiratram Nishad Stote of ChhattiS3arh and others WRFT PFTTTrON (S.l N0.7446 <y2006 Petitioner verajs Rewondents Jagganmth Himdhar Stnte of Chhatt'isgarfi and others WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0.7447 QF^006 Petitioner versus Resoondents Suresh Kumar Pathak Stnte of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETTTrON (5.) N0.7448 OF 2006 Petitioner verais Resopndents ChOTidra^ekhar Sharma State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETTTrON t5.) N0 7449 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Mohendra Kumar Mishra State of Chhatt-isgarh and others Petitioner WRFT PETmON (S.) N0.7450 CT 2006 Smt. Rama Karmkar (Maiden name-Ku. Itema Manctaf) yersus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETTTION fS.t N0.7451 OT 2006 Petitioner Resoondents verajs 5.K. Rathore State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others H) \f WRTTPETmON (5.1 N0.7452 OF 2006 Petitioner Uttam Kumar Tiwari versus Re^iondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRFT PETmON f5.1 N0.7453 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Jhcnak Rem Patel State of ChhaWsgarh ond others WQT PETTnON (5.1 N0.7454 OF_2006 Petitioner versus Respondents Viyxf famar bwivedi 5+ate of Chhatt^tSgnrh and others WRTT PETTnON tS.) N0.7455 OF 2006 Petitioner verais Respondents Mohesh Prasad Sahu State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRIT PETmON t5.) N0.7456 OF 2006 Petitioner versus Respondents Panchram Sahu State of Oihatt-iS9arh ond others WRrrpETmoN (s.) N0.7457 OF 2006 Petitioner versus Resoondents Smt. UshaChatur State of Chhcrttisgar+i ond others WRFT pETmoN (s.) NO. 7453 OF 2006 Petitioner versus Resoondents Puroriiattam Kumar (Saudiik State of Chhoitf-isgarh andothers r 6 WRTT PETTTrON (S.) N0.74S9 OF 20% Petitiowr Rewondentls versus P.N. Sharma State of Chhatl'isgarh and others WRTT PFTTTION (S.) N0.7460 OF 2006 Petitionef RespondentS versus Sitaram ^avar State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON tS.) N0.7461 OF 2006 Petitioner Responctents versus Akhilesh Kumar Dubey 5tate of Chhatt'isgarh cmd others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0.7462 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoonctents versus Balram Prasad Nayak Stnte of Chhattisgarh ond others Petitioner WRrT PETTnON (S.1N0.7463 OF 2006 Umerfi Prasad Sahu versus Resoondents 5late of Chhatti^arh ond others WBTT PEmnQN^S.) N0.7464 OF 2006 Petitioner Resoondents versus Chandra Shekhar 5ahu State of Chhatt-isgarh an^ others WRrTEETITrON fS.) N0.7465 OF 2006 Petitioner ReSQiondents verais Smt. Rekha Bhatt- 5tate of Chhattisgarh ond others WRIT PETmON fS.t N074660F 2006 Petitioner versus Respondents Puran Chand Patel Stnte of Chhorttisgarh and ofters WRTT PETTTION (S.UMS.7467 OF2Q06 Petitioner versus Respondents 5mt. Anitoi Ohri State of Chhattisgarh and others WRFT PETmON (5.1 N0.7468 OF 2006 Petitioner Ram Hari Sharaff versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTT PFTmON (5.) N0.7471 OF 2006 < Petitioner Resoondents versus Kanhaiya Lal Yadav State of Chhattisgarh and others tAr. Ajay Shrivastava, 5hri A.V. Shreedhar and Siri H.5. Ahluwolia, Advocates for The petitioners. Mrs. Anju Ahuju, beputy ©ovemment Advocote for the State/respondents. ORDER (^assed on 8ti* Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for +he petitioners as well as for the 5tate/req»ondents jointly submit that the facts and questwn of law involved in the present batch of writ f ^ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Courf- in the case of Yashwant Kumw Bharadwaj vs. Mwiicipal Cwpwwtim, Dwy snel anothei1'. The petitioners in W.P. (s) No. 7440 of 2006, 7456 of 2006 ond 7465 of have acquired M.Ed cert-ificates after obtaining B.Ed. cert-ificates. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jffeyesh Kww femavs. The State 6ovt. of ChhaWsgesit and aiwthei^ and other connected matters, decided by this CourT on 15-12-2006, purawnt to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination. it was clari'fied that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed cnd renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. lAccordingty, the b.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (.Sopedi t^nwr Vermavs. The State Sovf. of Chhattisgarh andwiothei) (Supra). For the aforementioned reosons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwvnt Kumar BharadwaJ (Supra), subject to verification of -the foct as to whether the petitioners hwe acquired B.Ed./M.Ed./B.T.I./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenas as per the circutars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 ond further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. 5. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006ai)MPJR-C096 Bablu »