IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 21921 of 1998 Between: J.L. BABU RAO, S/o. BUTCHAIAH, O/o. D.E. (Phones), External-II, Telecommunications, Saifabad, Hyderabad ,R/o. Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Area Manager, Department of Telecommunications, Suryalok Complex, Hyderabad. 2 The General Manager, Hyderabad Telecom District, Hydearbad. 3 The Director General (Telecom) Sanchar Bhavan, Department of New Delhi. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 31.11.1997 in OA.NO.200/97 , passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench as contrary to law and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents to grant temporary status to the petitioner by condoning the break in service of the petitioner from 1.2.87 to 22.11.92 with all consequential benefits and pass such other or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.21921 of 1998 ORDER: (per Smt. T.Meena Kumari,J) In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the order dated 3.11.1997 made in O.A No.200 of 1997 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench as arbitrary, illegal and to set aside the same. He also sought for a consequential direction to the respondents to grant temporary status to him by condoning the break in service of the petitioner from 1.2.1987 to 22.11.1992 with all consequential benefits and pass such other orders. At the time of hearing, Smt. Shobha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V. Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that temporary status has been conferred on the petitioner. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J DATE: 11th March, 2008 __________________ G. CHANDRAIAH,J pnb