1 wp5932-10 agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5932 OF 2010 M/s.Sai Erectors ..Petitioner. Versus Superintendent Engineer & Another ..Respondents. Mr.Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate i/by Mr.Prasad S. Dani for the petitioner. Mr.Chirag Mody with Mr.Kanthik Somasundran i/by DSK Legal for the respondents. CORAM : B.H. Marlapalle, & U.D. Salvi, JJ. DATE : 26th October 2010. P.C. : Though this petition was heard for some time, Mr.Jahagirdar, the learned senior counsel placed on record a copy of the order dated 3rd September 2010 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity. It appears that the Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce, Industries & Agriculture has filed an appeal (Appeal No.156 of 2010 and I.A. No.214 of 2010) before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity and the order dated 3rd September 2010 has been passed granting same interim protection. The Tribunal referred to its earlier order dated 26th March 2008 and directed that the same interim protection will be continued till the 2 wp5932-10 disposal of the appeal. It further directed the respondents not take any coercive action, such as disconnection of electricity etc. as against the appellant in respect of the existing supply of single point consumer. Mr.Jahagirdar, the learned senior counsel submitted that the petitioner is a member of the Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce, Industries & Agriculture and it is a single point consumer as of now. He, therefore, urged that if the Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce, Industries & Agriculture has filed an appeal in its representative capacity for and on behalf of all its members, the petitioner also must get the protection against any coercive actions being taken by the respondent No.2. Hence, we direct that if the petitioner is a member of Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce, Industries & Agriculture as of now, the protection granted by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity vide its order dated 3rd September 2010 and on appeal filed by the said Maharashtra Chamber, shall be applicable to the petitioner as well during the pendency of the appeal. The petition stands disposed off with the above clarification. All issues on merit are left open. (U.D. Salvi, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.)