IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5234 OF 2004 Mr.Brijeshmukar Jagdishprasad Varma ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.R.P.Mishra for Applicant. Mr.R.Y.Mirza, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 6, 2004. DECEMBER 6, 2004. DECEMBER 6, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 2. In view of the seriousness of the offence, not a case for bail. The appropriate course, to my mind, is to direct the Trial Court to expedite the hearing of the case and to finally dispose of the trial, not later than six months from today. : 2 : 3. The Applicant shall extend full co-operation for early disposal of the trial. In the event, the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is responsible for delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the Roznama, which will be reckoned in the event, the trial cannot be concluded in six months, as directed. 4. Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to communicate this order to the Registrar of the concerned Court, to ensure compliance of the order. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.