1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTMEPT PETITION NO.115 OF 2008 Kalpana Vishnu Raundal .... Petitioner V/s. Sharad Keda Raundal and Anr. ..... Respondent Ms.Shilpa R. Mangle i/by M.B.Gawade, for the petitioner. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 P.C. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for taking action against respondent No.1 under the Contempt of Courts Act, for breach of the undertaking dated 04-09-2007 filed by way of consent terms in First Appeal No.2075 of 2007. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent has now complied with the order of consent terms and now it is not required to entertain the contempt petition. In my view, since the respondent has already complied with the consent terms and by giving warning to the respondent not to commit any breach of the order, this contempt petition is disposed of. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)