COPC No.64 of 2008. 29.10.2008. Present: Mr.M.L. Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. This contempt petition has been filed alleging that the respondents have not complied with the directions issued by this Court in CWP No.375 of 2003, decided on 2.7.2008. By the said judgment, we had not given any directions to the respondents. We only agreed with the reasoning given by the learned Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition filed by the Union of India. The disobedience, if any, is of the orders of the learned Tribunal. Therefore, the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner would be to approach the learned Tribunal for the implementation of the order. In view of the above discussion, we dispose of the contempt petition as being not maintainable before this Court, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. October 29, 2008. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.