IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8498 of 2008. Decided on 7th December, 2010. Tripta Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State Subordinate Staff Selection Board, Hamirpur. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that she has not been called for interview. However, it has come in the reply filed by the respondent that the interview was fixed for 22.05.2002 and as per the address given by the petitioner in her application form, the call letter was sent to her under postal certificate on 06.05.2002. Consequently, there will be presumption that the call letter issued to the petitioner was received by her, under Section 11 of the General Clauses Act. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 07, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - - 3 -