IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45257 of 2009 HARESHWAR PANDEY @ HARISHAWAR PANDEY, Son of Shri Chandradhar Pandey, resident of Village- Suarchhap, Police Station- Lauriya, District- West Champaran Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.6672 of 2010 K.P.SINGH @ MUNNA SINGH, Son of Bijali Singh, resident of Village- Aranhawa, Police Station- Manjhaulia, District- West Champaran Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 25-02-2010 Both the bail applications arise out of the same F.I.R. and, as such, they are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwuvedy , Mr. Brij Kishore Mishra,both learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Siyaram Sahi, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are accused in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No.166 of 2009, corresponding to Sessions Trial No.550 of 2009 for the offences under Section 302,387,120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. - 2 - Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed supplementary affidavit in this case and has brought on record bail orders in respect of other co-accused persons who were having almost similar allegation like the petitioners of this case. In view of the fact that almost on similar allegation other accused persons have been granted bail, it is not advisable to refuse the prayer for bail of these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- ( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.No.IV, West Champaran, Bettiah, in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No.166 of 2009, corresponding to Sessions Trial No.550 of 2009 with condition that the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below , failing which their bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled, provided that in special exigency the petitioner can file petition before the court for prior permission for remaining absent on a particular date and if such petition is filed, the court below - 3 - may examine the same on its own merit . Further condition would be that if directly or indirectly any material is collected and brought to the notice of the court that the petitioners have threatened or influenced any of the witnesses, the court below shall be entitled to cancel their bail bond without referring the matter to this Court. With the above observation and direction, both the bail petitions are allowed. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J)