IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19618 of 2010 SAHEN SAH @ LANGRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Admittedly, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. Though, the petitioner is in jail custody since 07.02.2010 but uptill now , he has not been put on T.I.P. The perusal of impugned order shows that only material which has come against the petitioner is that after the alleged occurrence, one witness stated that the petitioner had called criminals for committing the alleged occurrence. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that inadvertently, at paragraph-11, it has been asserted that the petitioner has been made accused in Didarganj P.S. Case No. 12 of 2010 but as a matter of fact, the petitioner does not have history of any other criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, petitioner, namely, Sahen Sah @ Langra is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 05 of 2010 to the 2 satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City. One of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and holder of landed property. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)