IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2008 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 29563 of 2007(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- A. SREEPADHARAN,S/O. VELAYUDHAN, AYYAPPIL HOUSE, EASWARAMANGALAM AMSOM, KOTTATHARA DESOM, POST EASWARAMANGALAM, PONANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRIC.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. GEETHA,W/O. THEKKETH VIJAYAN, EASWARAMANGALAM AMSOM, KOTTATHARA DESOM, POST EASWARAMANGALAM, PONANI TALUK. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL – R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL - R3 SMT.MANJU RAJAN FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.29563/2007 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD. 18/01/2007 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 25/09/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R3(A): COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE C.I.OF POLICE, PONNANI. EXT.R3(B): COPY OF AGREEMENT DTD. 04/07/2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE Kss K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 29563 OF 2007 ============================ DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that the police officials are harassing him at the instance of the third respondent. According to him, the police is unnecessarily interfering in a civil dispute between him and the third respondent. The third respondent would submit that agreeing to sell a property, the petitioner received an amount of Rs.1.5 lakhs from her as advance sale consideration. Later, she came to know that the petitioner has no right over the property which he agreed to sell and received the advance consideration. So, the third respondent moved the police against the cheating. The parties came to an amicable settlement and the petitioner agreed to pay the amount received as advance to her on 5-9-2008. To rigggle out of the liability under the said settlement, the present writ petition is filed, it is submitted. 2. The learned Government Pleader upon instruction submitted that the police have no intention to harass the petitioner and the WP(C)NO. 29563/2007 2 parties were advised to approach the civil court to settle their dispute. Recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the police have no intention to harass the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. The contentions of the petitioner and the third respondent are left open. Sd/- K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI JUDGE ks. TRUE COPY