IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 7798 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSE.T.K, S/O.KUNJIYU, THOMMANA HOUSE, AVITTATHOOR(PO), IRINJALAKUDA. BY ADV. SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE VELUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,REP; BY ITS SECRETARY,KOTTANELLURE(PO)680 672. 2. WALTEN.T.P, S/O THOMMANA PAVU,WARD NO.5, KUTTIKKADAN MOOLA, AVITTATHOOR(PO), IRINJALAKKUDA. ADV. SRI.T.M.RAMAN KARTHA FOR R2 SRI.MANJU R.KARTHA FOR R2 SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN FOR R1 SMT.P.A.ANITHA FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 7798/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT. 5-7-2008. EXT.P2 COMPLAINT DT. 10-7-2008. EXT.P3 COMPLAINT DT. 25-7-2008. EXT.P4 PETITION DT. 17-8-2008. EXT.P5 LETTER DT. 27-8-2008. EXT.P6 RECEIPT DT. 19-1-2009. EXT.P7 LETTER DT. 16-2-2009. EXT.P8 REPRESENTATION DT. 9-2-2009. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 7798 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 20th March, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 1st respondent in processing an application for licence submitted by the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioner, the poultry farm is in a residential area and therefore the starting of the poultry form in a thickly populated area would cause serious health and pollution problems. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the 1st respondent- Panchayat also. 3. I am of opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the objections of the petitioner also before taking a decision on the application for licence stated to have been submitted by the 2nd respondent. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: While considering the application for licence submitted by the 2nd respondent the objection raised by the petitioner shall also be considered and a hearing shall be afforded to both the petitioner as well as the 2nd respondent. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/