1 294.11-revn(st) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 294 OF 2011 Bombay Electric Supply & Transport Ltd. ... Applicant. V/s. Naimuddin Abdul Masjid Khan and others. ... Respondents. S.K.Shinde i/b. M/s.M.V.Kini & Co. for the applicant. D.R.More, APP for the State. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 25th July 2011. P.C. : Revision is taken up for hearing by consent of parties. 2. By this revision, the applicant challenges the judgment and order dated 25th August 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai thereby acquitting the respondents- accused of the offence punishable under sections 135 and 138 of the Indian Electricity Act. 3. A prosecution was launched with the allegation that the accused had indulged in the theft of electricity by tampering the meter. Learned trial Judge acquitted the accused. Mr.Shinde, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the trial Court has grossly erred in acquitting the accuse. He submits that the findings of the appellate Court are perverse and, therefore, warrants interference at the hands of this Court. However, the perusal of the 2 294.11-revn(st) impugned order would reveal that the trial Court has observed that the alleged meter which was seized was not even sent to the Electric Inspector to obtain his report whether it was tampered or not. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that the order of acquittal is either perverse or impossible. 4. Revision application is, therefore, rejected. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)