IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 168 of 2006 (M/B) Muneer Khan s/o Late Gulam Haidar, R/o Kotwali, Pithoragarh, Takana, Distt. Pithoragarh ……. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through District Magistrate, Pithoragarh, District Pithoragarh. 2. Superintendent of Police, Pithoragarh. 3. S.H.O., Kotwali, Pithoragarh. 4. Sri Laxman Singh Tolia, Senior Manager, Punjab National Bank, Pithoragarh, Distt. Pithoragarh. ……… Respondents Sri Kurban Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. None for respondent no. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Kurban Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.C. Pande, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. None for respondent no. 4. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Muneer Khan seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has now become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 16.02.2006 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 1270 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 28.07.2006 28.07.2006 A