IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA’ PRADE$H AT JAEé-VLPUR‘ mgru Nc% Ewof 199g y ARTLCULABS OF THE :,’ Madhya Pradesh State Road .P.E£I.I~2;QRX::§_Q_. TranSpor’? lCoraomtion bhrough V it Divisifonaf Ménager,'LRaig;ur~ P VERSU$ M‘EP‘ Verma 3/0 M¢L¢ Varma, Traffic Supérvisor Gal, MPSRTC, 'Raiaur, R/o G~47, Shanker Nagar Oalony, Section—J} W23. Ousing Board, Shanker Nagar, Raiour; 92‘ Presiding Officer, Labour Court; Raipur“ 5 3),. Member Judga, $tate Industrial Court, Bench Raigur, Raipurg‘: ‘ \ PETITION LNDER~ARFICLES 226-227 OF THE CDN$IITUTEONDE INDIA PARTICUIARS O THE RESLPQNDENE WI, > N ”mm H ‘ F \ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR Wn'tM Petition No. 88 of 1995 Petitidner Madhya Pxadesh State Road Tiansport Corporation though 1 Dlvmlonal Manger Raupur Versus Respondants M. P. Verma &. othem. Single Bench : hon’ble Mr. Justica satish K. Agihoui. None for the petitioner. Shn' Amit Shanna, coimsel for the respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER a“ (1“ March, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agnihatri J. S P C was duected to be Issued on 5 1 2006 to the peutloner as well as the respondents In Iesponse of the S P C the Respondent No 1 has appeared The pennoner dxd not tile any appearance or representatlon. The matter was called for hearing twice. On boih the occasions, none appealed nor any mpxesentation was made on behalf of the peh'tioner. In View of the above, the petition stands Bablu dismissed for non-prosecution. Sdl- Satish K.Agnihotri ' 7 Judge go J