IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2008 / 8TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 445 of 2007(S) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33634/2004 Dated 22/01/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER -------------------------------------- P.RAVIMANOHARA DHAS, INSPECTOR OF POSTS (OFFICIATING), RMS, IV, 2ND SUB DIVISION, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.KRB.KAIMAL (SR.) SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, KERALA CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 2. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF RMS, RMS IV DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------- R.P. No. 445 OF 2007 ----------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2008 O R D E R ~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner, who was an ad-hoc promotee, was reverted to his parent cadre. Apprehending that his reversion was for promoting others on ad-hoc basis, the Original Application was filed. The O.A. was dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the writ petition challenging that order was dismissed by this Court also. The petitioner submits he pursued the remedy, apprehending that his juniors may be promoted on ad-hoc basis. That apprehension did not materialise. Therefore, this Review Petition is closed. If any cause of action arises in future, the petitioner will be free to workout his remedy. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) ps