WPMS No.2105 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. B. D. Upadhayaya, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sharad Sharma, the learned senior counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition against the concurrent findings given by the courts below holding that the need of the landlord is bonafide and accordingly directed to release the premises in question. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, a prayer was made by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that if some time is allowed to the petitioner, he will vacate the premises and handover peaceful & vacant possession of the property in question. In the light of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:- (i) The petitioner will handover peaceful and vacant possession of the premises in question to the landlord opposite party on or before 31st October, 2012. (ii) The petitioner will file an undertaking before the prescribed authority within two weeks from today indicating therein that the petitioner will handover peaceful and vacant possession of the premises in question to the opposite party on or before 31st October, 2012. (iii) In addition to the aforesaid, the petitioner also give an undertaking that he will pay the rent / damages, if not deposited or paid, to the landlord within four weeks from today and, further, the petitioner will also give an undertaking that the rent from December, 2011 onwards shall be paid by the petitioner to the landlord opposite party on or before 07th day of each month. (iv) In the event of default of any of the condition, it would be open to the landlord to proceed against the petitioner for vacation of the petitioner forthwith. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.11.2011 LSR