KE<SH COU&T OF CHHATTESeAKH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (5) No. 4042 of 2008 P&titsoner Ashwani |?umar Sohu, 5/o RampraTap Sohu, a^ed about 26 yrs, R/o village- Efam^idhi, Post ^hursena, Tah^il Nawsgarh/bs^trict - Durg (C.6.) Versus Ri&^pondents 1. Stote of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Panchoyat ard J^irai Developmwit, D&jxirtment MQntrolaya, &.K-S- Bhcwan, Raipur (C.6.) 2- Colj&ctor1 (&s^trict Programma Co- ordinator) hkiTionai Rurai Empbyment Qauarwitee Schame, Chharrisgarh, &(STrict Ourg (C.&.) 3. Chief Executive Offic&r, Zita PGnchcsyat - burg bi^trict byrg (C.6.) 4< .Tonfxscl Panchsyat Nawagarh Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Pandiayat Nawa9arh bistrict bur9 (C.6.) 5. 6ram Panchoyat Eramshahi. through Sat^panch, Block Nawa9arh, &istt<ict &ur9 (C.©.) 6. Ku. Hema Shnvos, D/o ftamediwar ^iriwas. ft/o Vsltage .Thulana, Btock - NawM^arii, Oisirict Ourg (C.6.) WRTT PETTTON UN&ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTrUTION OF IN&IA. Singt®Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J. JStri Indr<3 Sers Sahu, Advodote for the petitioner- Ms. Sursita Jain, Pansl Lawy&r for th& re^ond&nts No- 1 and 2. OR/(L ORDER (Passecl on this 28th day of Jufy, 2008) 1- With the con^fent of leorned coun^&l Qppearing for the pfirtias, th& mattsr is h&ard finolty. ^^j^ 2. 4. Thwur The petition&r, bsing aggrtBV&d by the ordsr dated 31.3.2C^)8 (Annexure P/4), wherem the p&titioner was not s^lscted for appointnient on the pojst of ^rom Rozgfir Soh^ok, poss(&d by tha Chiaf Exfecutive Offsc&r, .Tanporf PQnchayat ivagar4i, bistnct &urg, the petitionsr HQS pref&rr&d on app&ol/repr&gentation to the Collector. &ur9 on 15.5.2008 (Annexure P/7). Wsthout WGJting for the d&dsion ©fthe appelbte iHjthority, th& petstsorser ^triiightway has approached to •rtiis Court for qpjashing of the appointment order of the r^^ond&nt Mo.6 (i(u. HeiTO Shriyos) on •ijhe ground that th& r-e^pondfent No.6 is not G residsnt of the concern&d vitloge. B& liidt GS it moy, sincs 'rif»&appeal is pending con^ideratiwi before the Collsctor burg, altsmatiVfi p&titson cannot ^ filecl $n this Court. TTie pstitioner 15 w&IS odvised to pursi^ the ^peat p&ndin9 bsfor^ the Collector, bsfor& c&msng to this Court-. Thus, 'ttii^ p&titioner is dismlssed 05 not nusiritcsiriabl&, in ysaw of the |»nd&ncy of the opp^al before th& Collector, burg^ Tt is axp&cted that l+ie coriosrri&d authorily ^iaSS conssd&r and ctecicte the apperil/r&pre^entation datecl 15.5.2008, &xpaditiousSy. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge