IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTYNINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 8 7 1 of 2009 Between Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust, Tettekunta village (Agraharam) Vemulawada, Karimnagar district. … Revision Petitioner V/s. K.V.Ramana chary Prl.Secretary (Revenue) Endowments Department, Govt.of AP Hyderabad & Anr. … Respondents Counsel for the Revision Petitioner: Sri Mohd.Asifuddin Counsel for the Respondents : Govt.Pleader for Home THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3410 OF 2008 O R D E R : This contempt case is filed under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to punish the respondents for violating the orders dated 20-5-2009 passed by this Court in WP.No.10180 of 2009. 2. The only grievance of the petitioner in this contempt case is non-consideration of the representation dated 15-03-2009 submitted to the Chief Minister seeking to provide financial assistance to arrange food and accommodation to the guest for smooth conduct of spiritual programme and police bandobast for proper functioning of the programme. 3. However, in the counter-affidavit it has been sworn to by Sri M. Venkat Narsaiah, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Vemulawada Police Station, Karimnagar district that the petitioner has submitted a representation to the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar on 10-5- 2009 stating that on 13th and 14th June, 2009 a programme was going to be conducted in connection with 7th anniversary at Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust, Thettekunta (Agraharam), Vemulawada Mandal and in this connection to provide financial assistance to arrange food and accommodation to the guests and for smooth conduct of spiritual programme police bandobust and on the occasion of the above said programme on 10-5-2009 the levelling work was going on at the premises of said temple with the help of JCB for erecting tents etc., and kamal arches, some of the miscreants namely A. Mallaiah, Ex-sarpanch, Chandragiri and Gajabhinkar Narayana, Gandhinagar, Sircilla and hence the petitioner requested the Superintendent of Police to register a case against the above said persons and for conducting the above said function, police bandobast may be accorded at the premises of said temple. It is further averred in the counter-affidavit that with regard to providing financial assistance to arrange food and accommodation to the guests is not pertaining to the police department. Further in respect of providing bandobast on 13th and 14th of June 2009 respectively, it is submitted that on 13-6-2009 at 07:00 hours the Sub-Inspector of Police had deputed the Head Constable 1803 Cheena Naik, one Sectionof APSP consisting of six persons of the Vemulawada Police Station to attend bandobast at the temple. Accordingly, the said police personnel have attended the bandobast for two days effectively and the celebrations were completed peacefully and after completion of bandobast the police personnel have returned to the Police Station on 14-6-2009. 4. In view of the same and for the foregoing reasons, nothing survives in this contempt case and it appears that sufficient compliance of the orders of this court have been made. I do not find any disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. 5. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO 29-04--2010 I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 8 7 1 OF 2009 CIRCULATION ENTRY No.7 3 Date: 29-04-2010 Court Master : I s L Computer No. 43