1 3004.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3004 OF 2011 Mrs.Vanita Subhas Pawar ...Petitioner Versus Union of India (Ministry of Finance) & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.A.A.Siddiqui for Petitioner. Mr.K.V.Saste for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MAY 5, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Considering the grievance made by the petitioner in the present Petition that the Bank account of the petitioner which has been attached pursuant to the order passed by respondent No.3, is Pension Account of the petitioner, the respondent No.3 who is present in Court states that he would recall the earlier order and examine the grievance of the petitioner that the Pension Account No.0164101113247 in Canara Bank cannot be attached as per law. The assurance so given by the respondent No.3 is accepted. 2 3004.11 3. In view of the statement made before us, the earlier order passed by respondent No.3 dated 10th February, 2011 is set-aside with liberty to the respondent No.3 to re-examine the case on its own merits. 4. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)