^ M ::.l '^ ^ 'u i ^! ^-J/A'? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DfVISEON BENCH CORAM: HON5BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHR1 SUNEL KUMAR SINHA, J. Petitioners M.C.C.No. 736 of 2010 1 Smt. Durga Bai; w/o late Patwa, aged about 25 years. Lekhram Master Vikki S/o iate Lekhram patwa, aged about 3 years. Ku. Pinki, d/o. late Lekhram patwa; aged about 1 year. No. 2 and 3 through the mother appllcant No.1 ail residents of Taiab Mandir; in front of Lal Shop House of Deverdha Driver, New Changorabhata, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents 3. Laxman Kewal Nayak s/o Shri Kewal Naik, r/o. G.E. Road, Tatabandh, Raipur C.G. Balakdas s/o Budhdhudas Manikpuri, aged about 45 years, r/o near Tekenaka Nagpur, c/o. Respondent No.1. The National Insurance Co. Ltd. Mount Road-1, Division Office, Sajjan Link, Comptex, Nagar, C/o. Mobin Maha!, iind Floor, Tetegraph Office, G.E. Road, Raipur C.G. ApDEJcation for restoration of IVI.A. No. 2046/2000 Present : Smt. Renu Kochar, counsei for the petitioners. ORDER sth (15tn Dscember, 2010) ^-•, ^^^•^^"' ^ [V The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Smt. Renu Kochar, learned counsei for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A. No.2046 of 2000 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 28.10.2010. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absenee of the petjtioners'/appeilants' counsel on 28.10.2010, when M.A. No.2046 of 2000 was taken up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds. 4} M.C.C. No. 736 of 2010; therefore; is allowed and M.A.No.2046 of 2000 is restored to its originai number. Sd/- Chief Justice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge