IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10337 of 2008. Decided on: 31.03.2011. ___________________________________________ Sarwan Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Jagdish Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the reply filed by the respondents, he does not press this petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as not pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. March 31, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?