S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.373/2004 Jamal vs. Ram Ratan @ Ram Lal. Date : 10.4.2006 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. SN Trivedi, for the appellant. Mr. GL Khatri, for the respondent. Mr. Ram Ratan, respondent present in person. - - - - - Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent has vacated the suit shop. The respondent present in person in Court does not dispute this. In view of the above, the appellant does not want to proceed with this appeal as the suit itself has become infructuous. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya