FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.262 OF 1993 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10040 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10041 OF 2007 (Nandkumar Laxmanrao Kawar Vs. Kishanprashad Hiralal Darak & ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri K.S. Naik, Advocate for petitioner Shri R.P. Dhase, Advocate for respondents ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 20th December, 2010 1. Heard. Interim relief flows from 1993. On earlier date, learned counsel for the petitioner expressed his inability to proceed as he has no response from the revision petitioner and he is also unaware of the development in the matter. Notices are already issued to the petitioner also by the learned counsel. In the set of above facts, the revision applicant has lost interest. The controversy relates to depositing Rs.3500/- within 7 days pursuant to order dated 9.11.1992, I do not see any mistake in such exercise. Civil Revision Application with other applications dismissed. No costs. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/cra26293