THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU On Tuesday, the twenty fourth day of January, two thousand and six. W.P.No.17815 of 1996 Beesetti Durgalamma …….Petitioner. And: Mandal Revenue Officer, Srungavarapukota, Vizainagaram District and another. ……..Respondents. O R D E R: Apprehending that he may not be served with a final order to be passed on the notice issued under Rule 3 of Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules 1977, this petition filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to serve a copy of final order passed by the 1st respondent on the proceedings initiated against the petitioner. While admitting the writ petition, a learned Judge of this Court in WPMP No.21944 of 1996 passed the following Order dated 28.8.1996: “ The first respondent i.e., the Mandal Revenue Officer, Srungavarapukota, Vizianagaram District is directed to afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before any orders are passed in the proceedings initiated by the impugned proceedings under Rule 3 for contravention of the provisions of Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of Andhra Pradesh Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977. It is further directed that if any orders are passed finally in the said proceedings, a copy of the said order shall be served upon the petitioner. It is further directed that until such time as final orders are passed by the said Mandal Revenue Officer in the aforesaid proceedings, the petitioner shall not be evicted or dispossessed from the land in question.” In para-3 of the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent on behalf of the respondents, he undertook to serve a copy of the final order on the petitioner. In view thereof, this petition become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ----------------------------------- JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU 24th January 2006. BCS