IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 321 of 2008 Between: Kakarlapudi Rama Raju S/o.Appalaraju Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chinagadili, Visakhapatnam (Rural) District. 3 Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Rep. by its Vice Chairman, Udyog Bhavan, Siripuram Junction, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac 3.37 cents covered by Sy.no. 369/2 of Madhurawada,Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhaptnam District without following the due process of law as Illegal, arbitrary unjust and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of above said land and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent 3: Smt. V.Preethi Reddy. The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to approach appropriate Authority for necessary redressal and also to approach this court again, if necessary. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to approach appropriate Authority for necessary redressal and also to approach this court again, if necessary. However, the interim order granted on 08-01-2008 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 18-02-2008 Prv To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}