IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2147 of 2011 Pradip Yadav & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 6 22.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are accused in Sono P.S. Case No.61/10 registered under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The alleged recovery is firearms and cartridges. It appears from the F.I.R. that the petitioners were apprehended while they were standing outside the hut and inside the hut one Ashok Kumar Ram was found who is alleged to have been kidnapped. A separate case was lodged for kidnapping being Jhajha P.S.Case No.142/10 dated 24.5.2010 under Sections 364A/34 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have been made accused in connection with the said kidnapping case for oblique reason. It is alleged that said Ashok Kumar Ram has stated that the petitioners were putting pressure over him after kidnapping for ransom to the tune of Rs.2/- lacs but still their name did not figure in the F.I.R.He further submits that during trial, which is going on, petitioners have not been identified. It is also submitted that this Court earlier by orders dated 4.3.2011, 27.4.2011,23.6.2011 and 30.6.2011 has called for the antecedent report of the petitioners. The same has been received under Letter 2 No.1138 dated 11.4.2011 under the signature of Superintendent of Police, Jamui. As per the said report the petitioners are accused in only two cases, i.e., the present one and another being Jhajha P.S.Case No.142/10. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, Pradip Yadav and Pramod Yadav, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sono P.S.Case No.61/10 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui. The court shall ensure that one of the bailers is blood relative of the petitioners. AnilKrSinha (Ahsanuddin Amanullah , J.)