IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.20269 of 2006 Between: S.V. Krishna Reddy S/o Koti Reddy Junior Assistant, S.K.R.B.R. College, Narasaraopet, R/o. 1st Lane, N.G.Os. Colony, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Director of College Education, Andhra Pradesh O/o Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The Regional Joint Director of College Education, Guntur, O/o Women’s College Campus, Guntur District. 3. The Secretary & Correspondent, S.K.R.B.R. College Committee, Narsaraopet, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in placing the petitioner under suspension on 8.3.2006 as extended by the 1st respondent by his order dt: 15.09.2006 as illegal, arbitrary and against the Rules of the A.P. Education Act and violative of Art. 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the order of the 3rd respondent dt. 8.3.2006 as extended by the 1st respondent order dt: 15.9.2006. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for Respondent No.3: MR. B. CHINNAPA REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.20269 OF 2006 ORDER: The writ petition has been ﬁled questioning the suspension of the petitioner from service pending enquiry into certain allegations made against him. Though interim suspension of the impugned proceedings was granted by this Court while admitting the writ petition on 27.09.2006, subsequently, on ﬁling of vacate stay petition by the 3rd respondent, the same was vacated subject to condition that the petitioner shall be paid full salary during pendency of the enquiry, till appropriate orders are passed. Now, it is brought to the notice of the Court that the petitioner attained the age of superannuation during the pendency of the writ petition and thereafter the enquiry was completed and a punishment of dismissal from service was imposed on him. In view of the above, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication and the same is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. _________​__________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 6th November, 2008. IBL