1 CWP-2051.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2051 OF 2009 Anjali Ramesh Waghmare .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Sanjeev P. Kadam for the Petitioner. Ms A.A. Mane, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 08, 2011 P.C: This petition seeks expungement of certain remarks made by the learned Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in the order passed below Exhibit-7 in Sessions Case No.175 of 2009. The observations which are sought to be expunged are that the petitioner had ample opportunity to disclose to the Court that she had been appointed for one of the victims of the alleged offence. The learned Judge has made these observations since he remembered that there were at least 2-3 meetings between him and the petitioner before the petitioner was selected to represent the accused in that case. First, 2 CWP-2051.09 the observations are made by the learned Judge on the basis of what he remembered. Therefore, there is nothing concrete as such about the conduct of the petitioner and therefore there is no need for the petitioner to feel apprehensive that the Judge has made any adverse comment against her. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)