1 6 appa.1079.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1079 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 234 OF 2006 Santosh Haridas Bhandwalkar. ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ----- Mr. A.M.Joshi for the Applicant. Ms. S.V.Gajare, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and U.D. SALVI, JJ. DATE : 21 st September, 2010. P.C. 1 This is second bail application of the Applicant. The learned counsel for the Applicant after some deliberation and as the Court wanted to pass order on merits, suggested that instead of recording findings on merits, though prima-facie for considering bail, the Court may dispose of the application by directing that the appeal be proceeded for hearing. In the circumstances, prayer for bail is rejected on merits without recording reasons as per the request of the Applicant. 2 Insofar as appeal is concerned, office shall process the 2 6 appa.1079.10 appeal, if ready in all respects. Appeal be listed under caption “convicts in jail” as per its turn, which is already expedited category of cases as per the present assignment. Ordered accordingly. [ U.D. SALVI, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]