1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR L.P.A. NO.387 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1308 OF 2011 (D) CHOTA GONDIA EDUCATION SO. GONDIA, THR. SECRETARY & ANR. ..VS.. JAGANLAL BABURAO SAWALAKHE & ANR. WITH L.P.A. NO.389 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1292 OF 2011 (D) CHOTA GONDIA EDUCATION SO. GONDIA, THR. SECRETARY & ANR. ..VS.. DILIP UDARAMJI KATHANE. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. I.S.Charlewar, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE & P.V.HARDAS, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2011. 1. These letters patent appeals have been filed by the appellants challenging the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 18th July, 2011, rendered in Writ Petition Nos.1292 of 2011 and 1308 of 2011 dismissing the petitions filed by the appellants herein. 2. The learned Single Judge had examined the contentions, which were raised by the appellants before it on merits and has recorded a finding that the appellants herein had not been able to establish the alleged forgery of the documents. The learned Single Judge has also recorded that the appellants had not filed written statement and 2 consequently were not permitted before the learned Single Judge to raise any plea in respect of forgery of the documents. The learned Single Judge has also recorded a finding that the appointment of the respondents herein was in accordance with the Rules. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants, with whose assistance we have perused the findings recorded by the learned Single Judge. 4. We do not notice any infirmity in the order of the learned Single Judge to warrant any interference in these letters patent appeals. Consequently, both the letters patent appeals are dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR..