IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-11122 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.8.2011 Rekha Rani & another ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Sunita Nandal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondents No.4 to 7. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners as they have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 7. Learned State counsel submits at the outset that adequate security has already been provided to the petitioners. He has referred to reply by way of affidavit of Saurabh Singh, Superintendent of Police, Jhajjar. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, no cause of action survives in this petition. Thus, no orders are required to be passed in this case. Disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 24.8.2011 'rajpal'