IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11769 of 2006 1. RAVI PRAKASH, S/O LATE SHAIL SHARMA 2. SHUSHMA SHARMA, D/O LATE SHAIL SHARMA 3. SIMA SHARMA, D/O LATE SHAIL SHARMA 4. SUMAN SHARMA, D/O LATE SHAIL SHARMA 5. RASHMI SHARMA, D/O LATE SHAIL SHARMA RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- DAHIYAWAN TOLA, CHAPRA TOWN, DISTRICT – SARAN. ……….. PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE J.P. UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 3. THE REGISTRAR, J.P. UNIVERSITY, CHAPRA. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, RAJENDRA COLLEGE, CHAPRA. ………… RESPONDENTS ----------- 12 15.04.2011 Sri Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioners in presence of learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of counter affidavit it appears that entire grievances of the petitioners have already been redressed. He submits that he is not in touch with the client and as such he is not in a position to dispute the stand. However, he makes a submission that in case any grievances still exist the petitioners may be granted liberty to file representation before the competent authority. In view of stand taken by the parties there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. In case grievances still exist the petitioners shall be at liberty to file representation before the competent authority and after filing of such representation it is expected that the competent authority will take decision in accordance with law without any delay. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)