IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. No. 168 of 2008. Decided on: 22nd October, 2010. ______________________________________________________________ Dharam Pal. …Petitioner. -Versus- Abhey Shukla and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Respondents have undertaken in the reply that the case of the petitioner for regularization was under consideration and his services will be regularized on the availability of sanctioned post. 2. Consequently, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, if not already considered from the due date, within a period of four weeks from today. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 22nd October, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -