:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 218 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 218 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 218 OF 2006. Smt. Yamunabai Punaji Gavit. ..Petitioner. Versus. Kashinath B. Gavit. ..Respondent. --- Shri. P.N.Joshi for the Petitioners. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 6, 2006. : MARCH 6, 2006. : MARCH 6, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel Shri. P.N. Joshi. By the impugned order the issue of tenancy is framed. The said order is under challenge. 2. Perused the pleadings. Prima facie, I see that there are pleadings in respect of the possession based on 7/12 extract which are prima facie covered under section 4 of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Land Act. Therefore the issue is rightly framed. Hence, no interference is called for. Petition is accordingly dismissed. (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)