-1- IN THE HOBNLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAniSHGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P(S). No. -^ 2>so 2007 Petitioner .„. /... Kejuram Dewangftn, Aged 38 years o.-R'r-/A S/o Late Shri Ratiram Dewangon, .^ ^-:''' ..•••'"' Sanvida Sala Sikchhak Verg -3. Primary School, Babhaitola Tah. Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgoan, (C.G.) Versus ,T yy ^' ftesponden.^.. 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education/Agriculture Deptt. D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. "7? ^'^•y •'' -^y ^.v' 2. The District Education Officer, Rajnandgoan (C.G.) Writ Petitipn under Article 226 of the C^nsittutlon of India The petitioner, respectfully furnishes the particulars of the writ petition as under:- ^Atea !F- ^^^s:^i%"1. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETmON (S) No. 6350 of2007 Kejuram Dewangan. RESPONDENTS VERSUS The State ofChhattisgarh & Auother. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SBLHon'bie Shri Satish K. Aemhotri. J. Present: Shri Somkant Vemia, Advocate for the petitioner. Siiri Ajit Smgh, Panel Lawyer forfhe State/respondents. ORDERCORAL) {fassed on 30th day ofMareh, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent aufhorities to treat the petitioner to be appointed on a pensoinable post of Assistant Teaeher on reeular pay scale just one montli after fhe submission of application by the petitioner and to pay the amount of difference of pay and consequential benefits, with interest at fhe rate of 18%. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the after the death of father of the petitioner, who was a govemment employee, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Shiksha Kanni Grade III on compassionate basis. Shri Verma submits that thepost of Shiksha Karmi Grade III is a non-pensionable post and it is also not a regular post, thus, the appointment ofthe petitioner on the post ofShiksha Kanni, Grade III was contrary to clause 6(3) ofthe circular dated 10.06.2003 (Annexure P/4). 3. On the other hand, Shri Singh, leamed Panel lawyer appearmg for the State/respondents submits that the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade III is a regular post and the petitioner has been granted ^ i ib^s.a i Y ^/ appointment strictly in accordance with the policy of the State Govemment in regard to compassionate appointment. 4. On perusal of clause 6(3) of the circular dated 10.06.2003, it is found that the requirement is to appoint a person on compassionate basis against a regular post. There is no mention of pensionable post or non-pensionable post. Admittedly, the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade III is a regular post. The word 'pensionable' as pleaded by the petitioner is not the requirement of the compassionate policy. Thus, no relief as sought for in this petition can be sranted. 5. The petition is bereft ofmerit and is aecordmgly dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit