IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-37971 of 2010 Date of Decision: 25.03.2011 Reena Rani and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to provide adequate security to the petitioners as they are apprehending danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioners, who are present in the Court, states that as of now, they do not apprehend any threat to their lives and liberty. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 25.03.2011 JUDGE gurpreet