IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.16708 OF 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 Tarun Kumar and others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. S. S. Salar, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The grievance of the petitioners is that earlier the Diploma in Elementary Training was available for only graduates but now, during the process of admission, candidates with 10+2 qualification have also been made eligible. The submission that it will be discriminatory by making such students eligible for doing the diploma course, is totally misconceived. It is for the respondent-Organization to see and prescribe the eligibility for doing such a diploma course. Moreover, the graduates can not really have a grievance for competing with the persons who are qualified 10+2 class. It is minimum qualification, which is prescribed and all those who are having more than minimum qualification, would always be eligible. A person, who is graduate, would always be 10+2 class pass and, thus, would be better equipped to qualify in the course. No case for interference is made out. Dismissed. September 16, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE