HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.16475 of 2007 Dated 28th Julyf, 2011 Between: Juvvina Venkat Raju and two others. …Petitioners And The Secretary (Irrigation), State of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad And another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri V.Manohar Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: GP for Irrigation and CAD Counsel for respondent No.2: GP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in rejecting the petitions filed by the petitioners under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act through endorsement/memo No.A/731/2006, dated 10.11.2006 as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and further, direct the respondents to pass the award under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act in terms of the judgment in O.P.No.14 of 1987, dated 18.05.1995 on the file of II Additional District Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry relating to the petitioners’ land bearing Sy.No.62/2, 62/4, 75 admeasuring Ac.12.59 cents situated at Lingavaram Village, East Godavari District.” At the hearing, Sri Sri M.Nagaraju, learned counsel representing Sri V.Manohar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.20967 of 2007 filed by the writ petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th July 2011 DR