IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CACP No.5 of 2005(O&M) Date of decision: 27.10.2009 Harwant Kaur & another. -----Appellants Vs. Surinder Chaudhary. -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vishal Goel, Advocate for Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondent. --- ORDER: 1. This appeal has been preferred against initiation of contempt proceedings. 2. The respondent - contempt petitioner alleged that in violation of order of status quo granted by this Court on 27.11.2000 in Civil Revision No.5210 of 2000, the appellants executed sale deeds dated 19.5.2004 and 10.8.2004 and delivered possession. In view of above position, it was observed that there being violation of order dated 27.11.2000, the appellants were liable to be proceeded against for contempt. CACP No.5 of 2005 They were directed to deposit all the sale proceeds with the Registrar of this Court and to remain present on the next date. 3. It is not disputed that the appellants have executed sale deeds in violation of order of this Court. However, it is pointed out that during pendency of this appeal, suit of the respondent-plaintiff was dismissed on 10.5.2005 and the lower Appellate Court partly decreed the suit to the extent of 1/5th share of one parcel of the suit property, on 13.2.2007 and as per information of learned counsel for the appellants, no further proceedings have been taken. He states that the appellants undertake to deposit 1/5th share of the sale proceeds in respect of the land at Raipur, within one month from today, without prejudice to rights and contentions of the parties. It is submitted that in view of subsequent developments, matter may be considered by learned Single Judge. 4. Learned counsel for the contempt petitioner says that he is only a proxy counsel and does not know anything. 5. In view of above developments, no further order need to be passed in appeal. Matter can be considered by learned Single Judge. The appeal is disposed of. 6. Parties may appear before learned Single Judge for further proceedings on 11.01.2010. Civil Revision No.5210 of 2000 may also be put up before learned Single Judge on that day, if the said matter is still pending, as suggested by learned counsel for the parties. 2 CACP No.5 of 2005 (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE October 27, 2009 ( GURDEV SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 3