IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2954 of 2010. Decided on: 13th July, 2010. Radha Krishan Kaundinya. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. …… Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner submits that he is to retire from service in September, 2012. He had been accommodated in the Directorate only ten months back. The petitioner submits that this accommodation was granted on account of his cardiac problem and there is no complaint whatsoever with regard to the performance of his duty at the Directorate. But it is seen from the reply that owing to his ill health, the services of the petitioner could not be utilized. The concession in that regard has been granted to the petitioner to be retained at the Directorate. There is no case for the respondent that at Kangra there is only light work. It is seen that nobody has been posted in place of the petitioner also. Hence, there is no point in transferring the petitioner having realized his need for medical treatment at Shimla to Kangra. As far as the release of salary is concerned, it is stated in the reply that delay had occurred only on account of the fact that the file 2 was misplaced in the Secretariat. The writ petition is hence disposed of as follows: 2. The petitioner may file an appropriate representation re- assuring the respondent that he would work to the satisfaction of the Department. In the event of such representation being filed within two weeks from today, the matter will be considered afresh by the respondent, particularly taking note of the fact that no substitute has been posted in place of the petitioner. Appropriate orders, adverting to the submissions made in the representation be passed expeditiously. The salary due to the petitioner be disbursed to him within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 3. Till orders are passed, as above, interim order will continue. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 13th July, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.