769 ^TraTSRT, (jirfteTS, is|riltiy< t<l*1dl *t<l+ WI. 200 an^OT 'VRK (.'yiy^w) sn^i.w ft-fi'h W SfKV fKW 5;Rirar ^tfer SII^T HIGH COURT OF CHHlATTISGARH AT SILASPVR S.B. HON'BLE SHRI JU$TICB DHIRENDRA MISHRA W.P.fC) Petitioner Ku. I(ac':lctiani Bai @ Laxinibai, aysA about|22 years, daughter of Shri Toran Sataajtai, occupation - N1L, resident of vfflage| - Magarwah, PoUce Statioa - KaWai|dIia, Distt. Kabeerdhaia (C.O.) VERStJS Respondeats 1. State 2. 3. Tfcroul DeDadbneiit Bhawl Supeilintend Kabec fcif Chhattisgarh, ^h thc Sccrctary, of Hoine, Dau Kalvan Singh ^a, Raipiu~{C.G,) 02.01.2008 Smt. Savita Tiwari, counjsel for the petitioner. Shri Sandeep YadavJ Dy. State/respondents. The grievaace of the petj she was a victiin of rape and) prosecuted in Sessions Trial N| of bv the leamed Additional 9 judgment dated 6th Scptemb) convicted and sentenced fori ^Nf^T^ 'RTTI^ff ^f 'fe^l' '(f^^r? ^ affiTT OT^T 7716 bf 2007 Supeilintendeat of PoMce, Distt. dham(C.G.) Statiola House Officer. Police Station - Kawa^dlia, Distt. Kabccrdham (C.G.) ^iU.V<-'^ClLC -T/T^. i\jl fhe tioner in the instant oetition is that on her coinplaint fhe accused was >. 18/04 and the same was disposed essions Judge (FTC) Kawatdha vide :r 2004 whereby the accused was coiainittmg the offence. However, ?ire^r ^i^r gs'in^r, -FS/59—8/20'T —30.GUti. ssq' '^n\vii<, •QT^WW, RlvftWy. MIMrtl *Mlcb"•-------•-------•-•••-g^ 200 3»R(?r 'fla^? (^f^aqir) OT^I.qiT R-fi'b WIT91R?! W1W ~\. ^- i^irar ^rfro sii^r iuunediate .relief as envisaged Scheduled'Castes aad Schedilded Rules, 1995 (in short 'tfae Rul(| the petitioner till date. I have heaid leanied cojuisel for fhe petitioner and perused the niaterial avsdlable on recorfi. df Sub-rule 4 of Rule 12 the District Magisti-ate or th^ other Executive Magistrate foij iminediate relief ia cash or atrocitv, their fajailv ineiubeilE scale as ia the Schedule aant fhe docuiiients annexed witMi petitioner has not inade as|) authorities for grant ofreliefaj lu fhe aforesaid circuidi with a direction to the petitiotier fhe appropriate aufhorities Rules of 1995 for reUefand oili same shatl be decided bv fhe of 60 davs froia the date oK accordance with law. <ti1<ff<n<fl'ri iTTt^f Tf f^t' '^^F ^; sffiTT SII^T under sub-rule 4 Rule 12 of the Trit»es (Prevention of Atrocities) s of 1995') has not been provided to the Riiles of 1995 caste a dut\r on Sub Divisional Magistrate or aay luaking arrangemeats foi- providing ia kind or both to fhe victims of aad dependents accordine to the ;xed to these rules. However, froin this petition it auoears that the representation to the cooceraed conteinplated in the above Rules. Istances, fhis petition is disposed of to inake a representation before ilnder Sub-rule 4 of Rule 12 of the such representation being ffled, the •oncemed authorities within a period receipt of such representation in Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge iiiffl^ ^k g?i)RPT, <M-ii<<iici —FS/5^— 8/^Of^7 —30,GOU. r i