1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5166 OF 2009 (Vinod s/o Ganpat Meshram vs. State and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND F.M.REIS, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 27, 2009 Heard Shri Dhoble, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Sambre, learned Government Pleader for the respondents. Shri Dhoble, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that grievance of the petitioner is in respect of non-issuance of order of appointment by the respondents. It is submitted that the petitioner participated in the selection process and interview conducted by the respondents for the post of Cook. The petitioner was selected and his name was shown in the Select List published by the respondents. However, the petitioner did not receive order of appointment and, therefore, has approached this 2 Court by filing the present petition seeking direction to the respondents in this regard. Shri Sambre, learned Government Pleader for the respondents, does not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. However, It is contended that because of certain irregularities, which were noticed by the respondents after the selection process was over, the appointment order was not issued. It is submitted that further process was stayed by the Selection Committee vide communication dated 22.6.2009 and the issue is under consideration. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, it appears that name of the petitioner is shown in the select list published by the respondents and, therefore, it will be appropriate for the respondents to communicate the petitioner why there is delay in issuing order of appointment within a period of four weeks from today. With these observations and directions, the petition is disposed of by keeping the issues open. JUDGE JUDGE khj 3