fy/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 4429 OF 2008 1. Laxmi Barik; Wlo Shri Sadanand Barik, age about 50 years. Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 2. Karam Singh Yadav, S/o Shri Chain Singh Yadava. age about 58 years. U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Dakhsin Regaon. Distt. Raigarh (CG). 3. Janmajai Chouhan, Slo Shri Anand Ram Chouhan. age about 52 years, U.D.T., Govt. High School, Mahloi. Distt. Raigarh (CG). 4. Manbodh Ram Khandait, Sio Shri Shukaru Ram Khandait, age about 51 years, U.D.T., Govt. High School, Mahtoi, Distt. Raigarh (CG). 5. Nehru Lal Sharma, S/o Shri Krishna Chandra Sharma, age about 5O years. U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Dakhsin Regaon, Distt. Raigarh (CG). Versus 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary. Education & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department. Raigarh, Distt. Raigrh (CG). 3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. gnihotri, J. Present : Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 13‘“ day of August, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled to grant of two increments, as they have obtained the B.T.l. certificates in the year 1986, 1976, 1978. 1981 & 1979 (Annexure—PI2), respectiveiy, on their own expenses during the service period. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners may be granted liberty to make representation to the‘authorities for grant of two increments pursuant to the judgment and order dated 3-4-2006 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3977l2003 (Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg & Another). ( A ; @ 2) The Smte Government is under an obHgation to follaw the law settled by this Court and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the taw has already been settled by this Court. The employees. who are similarly situated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at per with other employees, who have approached this Court. It is not necessary to approach this Coart for similar order. 3) in view of the foregoing reasons, this petition stands disposed of. if the representation is tiled by the petitioners, the same may be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably widiin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. i Sdl— . i v Satish K. Agmhotn Judge i i r i i”, W