1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.862 of 2010 [Asaram Govinda Mundhe & two others Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Rahul Ghuge, Adv., for the applicants. Mr. N.W. Sambre, Public Prosecutor for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 28th May, 2010. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. Rahul Ghuge for the applicants and learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Nitin Sambre for respondent. 2. Perused the Case Diary. 3. The manner in which the offence has been narrated, on the basis of which the First Information Report is registered, creates a suspicion as to the motive as well as intention behind the crime. 4. Moreover, material as brought on record does not adequately make out a case either of Section 498-A or of Section 307 of Indian Penal Code. 2 5. In these premises, the applicants are entitled to be released pre-arrest bail. 6. In the event of arrest in connection with Crime No. 22/2010 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 498-A and 323 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station, Sindhkhed Raja, Distt. Buldana, the applicants be released on bail on furnishing a Personal Bond and a Solvent Surety in a sum of Rs.5,000-00 [rupees five thousand only] each. Judge |Hedau|