IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 709 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19/06/2008 in WP NO : 14043 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 D. Krishna Murthy, S/o. D. Ramaiah, D.No. IV-2-21, Krishnanagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 2 K. Seshachalapathi Naidu, S/o. K.M. Chandrasekhara Naidu, D.No. III-145-A-8-9, Prashanthnagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 3 K. Uma Maheswar Naidu, S/o. K.M. Chandrasekahar Naidu, III-145-A-8-9, Prasanthnagar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 4 G. Poornananda Choudary, S/o. G. Subramanya Naidu, R/o. D.No. 7/120, Rayapathi Nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 5 R.B. Srinivasulu Reddy, S/o. R.B. Thimma Reddy, Charala Village, Chowdepalle Mandal, Chittoor District. 6 C. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Pedda Nagi Reddy, R/o. D.No. II-241-4, Abbaiahgari Street, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 7 K. Raja Reddy, S/o. Gangi Reddy, R/o. D.No. II-242, East Kuruvavanka, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 8 K. Swaroopa Rani, W/o. K. Raja Reddy, R/o. D.No. II-242, East Kuruva Vanka, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 9 G. Devendra Reddy, S/o. G. Narayana Reddy, R/o. D.No. II-362, Co-Operative Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 10 T. Krishna Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, R/o. D.No. Ii-362, Co-Operative Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor district. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kurabalakota Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.D.KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 709 of 2008 ORDER : (per Sri Justice B Prakash Rao) Heard Mr B Adinarayana Rao for appellants and learned Government Pleader for Assignments and at their request the appeal is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. The appellants herein are unsuccessful writ petitioners, assailing the orders of the learned Single Judge dated 19.6.2008 vacating the interim order granted on 30.6.2005. Having heard the learned counsel for appellants and on perusal of the material available on record, it is sent that the counsel for appellants is not present when the matter is posted and the learned Single Judge having taken into consideration the contents of the counter aﬃdavit, did not ﬁnd any reasons to maintain the interim orders, hence vacated. However, having regard to several questions involved in the writ petition which cannot be gone into in the present appeal against an interlocutory order, this Court feels it desirable that the writ petition itself be taken up for ﬁnal disposal at the earliest. Hence, oﬃce is directed to list the writ petition for ﬁnal hearing before the appropriate Court on 20th October, 2008. Till the disposal of the writ petition, status quo existing as on today shall be maintained. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J _______________ R. KANTHA RAO,J DATE: 10.9.08 Tvk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 709 of 2008 Date: 10.9.2008