C^ t^zf^ IN THE HIGH COURT OFlCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. (S)No. ^g ?>^ OF 2010. PETITIONER ^^ -^^ ^-:"y^ ^•'^ "...."•"" -.^r'y RESPONDENTS ^ .^^ ^ Smt. Ajeet Kujur, aged about 140years,W/o.ShriB.Kujur, jAssistant Teacher, S. T. Boys jHostel, Malhar, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^_: _, •' :1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. AssistantCommissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^" ' • ' . . • 3. Block Education Officer, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C. G.) 4 <^Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C. G.) WmT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner beg to submit as under:- '—78 ^n^T^T'f^iw ^T2TT ^n^T ^^is^ ^,— h:''. i ^ *^l*«rl8 CT»*1(cb <^ TST ^i^Kn^, »ti1-M<i(o, f<a|dl^!j,< . ^,|/<rs)^.Z7r3^)i-D W1^"""""^""""""""""--V"'--!"^ 200 ^?r TT5f^ (^crf^sr^) ^HWHf^T 371^7 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVIdhars Shnvastava, J. 21-06-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, cou| Shri Chandresh Shri| State/respondents on advance G(| Heard. Learned counsel appear petitioner is entitled to benefit o| she having passed B.Ed. exami cost. It is submitted that the iss longer res integra and the sam^ Supreme Court in the oase of 2009 (1!1) MPJR (SC) 59. It is taken a similar view in hlsl W. P. (S)No. 6257 of 2008. Learnt attention of this Court to. order No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying| in the oase of Asha Saxena (su[| another Writ Appeal No.87/2|: consideration of the oase for d circular dated 21-09-1974 issu^ verification ofthe facts pteaded Learned counset for th^ petitioner v^ould 3tso be consid^ <=M^f<rl<flTl 'RT^Tf'^f "fe^ ^pal^K '^3tRTH3TT^?r isel for the petitioner. /astava, Panel La^vyer lpy. for the |ng for the petitioner submits that the two advance increments on account of ^ation before her appointment at her own ue involved in the present petition is no has been finaily decided by the Hon'bSe \sha Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., jrther submitted that this Court has aiso order dated 06-02-2009 passed in ?d counsel for the petitioner further draws jated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appea) upon the judgment of the Supreme Court 'ra) and the order passed by this Court in )09, directions have been issued for rant of two advance increments as per by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after the petition. respondents submits that case of the ed on the same lines. ^ ",^-'"s?4. '^. .^ ^' ^fe^'fl-HC—78 *11*iCTT <b*)|cb '3^T "LII^IQ1<M, ytll'M^Ko, fs|<'1l'H'j,< __^J,(<?.;^ 2^^t^ ^^.............^^......................^.;....^^ 200 STf^T'q^RT (lic<I'i«l<^) 3TI^T ^FT f<^ich '^SH 3T?^T sn^ic?) ^^TTW?rf?^3T^T ^ -^- °M^fci<Dl ^Mdlf ^f fs^l ^-^K '^3tRW37T^5T "^ 1 Tumane In view of the statemer disposed of with a direction to th deoide the claim of the petitioner per circular dated 21-09-1974 is after verifteation ofthe facts piea< weeks from today. made above, this petition is finaliy respondent authorities to consider and br grant of two advance increments as ued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, ?d in the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge