1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5057 OF 2010 (Smt. Alkabai Raghunath Bhonde & Ors. vs. The Divisional Commissioner & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. OCTOBER 15, 2010. Heard Shri Dhage, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Kankale, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3. It is apparent that the petitioners have failed to prove that the proposed notice of motion of no confidence was served upon Respondent No. 4. The Additional Collector has found that notice was served upon one Sukhram Wailker and Respondent No. 4 could not prove that said Wailker was not his relative. The appellate authority has found that the petitioners have not proved that Sukhram Wailker was relative of Respondent No. 4. The approach of appellate authority is correct. The burden was upon the petitioners to show that notice was served upon the relative of Respondent No. 4. Before this Court, Shri Dhage, learned counsel has argued that Sukhram Wailker was only a witness to service of notice and he is not relative. The 2 petitioners are not in a position to disclose the name of relative on whom notice is served. Shri Dhage, learned counsel makes a request in alternative. According to him, fresh meeting should be allowed to be conducted on same motion. It is apparent that such liberty is uncalled for in present matter. I, therefore, do not find any jurisdictional error. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE *GS.