1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Criminal Original Petition (MD)No.15374 of 2011 S.Alagappan ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent to file the final report in Crime No.734 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :Mr.B.Jameelarasu For Respondents :Mr.P.Kannithevan, Govt. Advocate, Crl. Side O R D E R This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to investigate the matter and file the final report in accordance with law in respect of crime No.734 of 2011 on the file of the 2nd respondent,within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. 2.Heard Mr.B.Jameelarasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that even though a case has been registered by the 2nd respondent police in crime No.734 of 2011 on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, no steps have been taken to complete the investigation and to file the charge sheet and hence, the present petition has been filed to direct the respondents to complete the investigation and file the final report within a time frame. 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit in his argument that the case in crime No.734 of 2011 has already been investigated and the matter was also referred as 'Mistake of Fact' on 15.09.2011 and and hence, nothing survives in this petition to complete the investigation and for filing the charge sheet. Therefore, he request the Court to dismiss the petition. 5.Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this Court could understand that the prayer sought for by the petitioner to issue a direction to file the charge sheet has already been completed, the relief sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous and hence, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petition is dismissed as unnecessary. However, the petitioner is not remediless and he can file necessary application for re-investigation before the learned Judicial Magistrate in accordance with law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) TO 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. pm Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15374 of 2011 28.11.2011 TR : 09.12.2011: 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/