1 revnl 690-09.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Revision Application (St) No. 690 of 2009 in M.J. Petition No.225 of 2007 Bhavesh Shailesh Chheda .. Applicant v/s. Hetal Bhavesh Chheda & Anr. ..Defendants Ms.Rashmi Gangwani i/b. Mr.Santosh Kanchar for the Applicant. Mr.Dharmesh Jain i/b.P.M.Sheth for the Defendants. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 18th March, 2011 P.C. : 1. The respondent herein filed application for maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. bearing No.E-225 of 2007. That application was finally heard by the learned Judge of the Family Court and by order dated 8.6.2009 he has decided the said application. The learned Judge has directed petitioner husband to pay to the respondent the sum of Rs.3500/- per month from the date of the application. 2. This order is challenged by way of criminal revision application. 2 revnl 690-09.sxw 3. I have heard learned Counsel on both sides. The petitioner claims that his salary was about Rs.6000/- and the inference drawn by the learned Judge that the petitioner is earning Rs.10,000/- is not correct. She therefore submitted that the grant of maintenance at Rs.3500/- is improper. 4. After having perused the entire record as also the xerox of the bank pass book. I am inclined to observe that the grant of maintenance at the time of passing order in June 2009 was rightly fixed. No interference therein is required so far as the order is concerned. 5. It was one of the contention of the Counsel on behalf of the petitioner that w.e.f. November 2010 the petitioner has lost his monthly job and he is doing some work on temporary basis as salesman in general shop selling various articles including gift items. Learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner submitted that on account of this development the order of maintenance is required to be reduced. If this is the factual position, it will be open for the petitioner to make an application before the learned Judge who passed the order dated 3 revnl 690-09.sxw 8.6.2009 for modification of the order on the ground of changed circumstances. If such an application is filed, same shall be disposed of on merits. Till further orders, the impugned order dated 8.6.2009 shall govern the parties so far as maintenance of the wife is concerned. 6. Petition stands disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]