:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 833 OF 2001 Avinash Bhanudas Shimpi. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharahstra and ors. ..Respondents. None for the Petitioner. Mr.P.A.Pol, APP. for the Respondents 1 to 4. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED : 09.4.2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Advocate for the petitioner is absent. The question raised in this petition is as to whether period of parole is required to be counted towards the sentence. On a plain reading of the petition, it appears that the petitioner was released in Nov.2001 but before his release Jailer informed him that his period of sentence was extended. Even this extended period is over. None appears for the petitioner and as the decision on the point is purely academic, I do not propose to dispose of the petition on merits. Accordingly, petition is disposed off, leaving rights, if any, available to the petitioner if he is able to prove that he was wrongly detained. Subject to this, petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)