HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.ISI No. 5492 of 2006 PETITIONER Veuudhar Singh, a^ed about 48 years, son of Shri Jaipal Singh, Lower Division Teacheer, D.Ed. Govenunent fTribal) Priaiaiy School- Bilabal, Vikas Khaud Kaasabel, District JashpurfC.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Througb; Secretary, Departxuent of Tribal Welfarc, Dau Kalyaii Siugh Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) 2 The Coraiuissioner, Departinent of Tribal WeUare, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Assistaat Coaajiiissioner, Departinent of Tnbal Welfare, Distdct Jashpur Nagar (C.G.) 4 The Block Education pfficer- Kausabel, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (Writ Petitlon uaderArticle 226 oftbe Constitution oflndial ABpearaace: Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for fhe State on advaace copy. ORALORDER (24.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on adiaission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitiouer subinits fhat the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examiaation on his own expenses, fherefore, he is entifled to icceive two advaace iucremeiits accordiug to circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subiuits that ia inaay identical inatters, the petitions have been aUowed in terois of fhe order passed in fhe case of Yttshwant Kunwr Bharcidweii Vs. Municipal Corporation, i?urg and cmofhcr /2006 ffQ JlffUR-CG 96?. He submits that the case of fhe petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgjment This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he submits that the order niay be passed ia terms of the said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regardiag petitioner's such qualification. r W,P,(Sl No, 5492 of 2006 Accordingly, fhis wiit petition is aUowed in. temis of the order passed ia case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg cmd another (Supra) subject to verification of fhe facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examination Certi&cate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advauce iacreinents or not. The petition stands finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. ~ Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge vattl r