IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3903 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3903 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.3903 OF 2005 Revathy Siddharath Roy. ... Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. Shri A.P.Mundergi i/by M/s.Rajeev Sawant & Associates for the Applicant. Ms.Rajashree Gadhvi, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. Shri Satish Maneshinde for intervenor. Ms.Rati Amrolia for the Complainant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 4th July, 2005. : 4th July, 2005. : 4th July, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Mundergi, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant. Heard Shri Satish Maneshinde, learned Counsel appearing for the Intervenors, Ms.Rati Amrolia, learned Counsel appearing for the Complainant, and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail by the Applicant. F.I.R. has been registered against the Applicant in Gamdevi Police Station for offence punishable under sections 379, 406, 409, 468, 471, 472, 473 read with section 120(B) of the Indian : 2 : 2 : 2 : Penal Code. The application made by the Applicant for anticipatory bail has been rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. 3. Considering the fact that the allegation against the Applicant is regarding commission of very serious offence and considering the fact that the amount involved is very large in my view the Applicant is not entitled to any relief. It is alleged that the Complainant parted with a large amount on the basis of fabricated documents got prepared by the accused. The learned A.P.P. pointed out that there are other complainants coming forward making similar allegations against the Complainant. Considering the gravity of the allegations against the Applicant, this is a case where custodial interrogation of the Applicant will be necessary. Hence the Application is rejected. 4. Shri Mundargi, the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant states that the husband of the Applicant is sick and is in coma and therefore, time of two weeks be granted to the Applicant to surrender before the Investigating Officer. He states that the Applicant is personally present in Court. This request is opposed by the learned A.P.P. and the Counsel appearing for the Applicant. 5. Considering the fact that the Applicant’s husband is : 3 : 3 : 3 : sick, time of one week is granted to the Applicant to surrender before the Investigating Officer. For the period of one week, the Applicant will attend the concerned Police Station as and when called upon to do so for the purpose of investigation. 6. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. Judge. Judge. Judge.