IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 361 of 2010 Date of Decision : April 28, 2011 Jagdish Parsad ....Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present : Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. J.S.Dahiya, Advocate for applicant-respondent No.12. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. Mr. Praveen Chauhan, learned counsel for the appellant, has pleaded no instructions to the query of applicant-respondent No.12 that the appellant has expired and the Letters Patent Appeal does not survive. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S.MANN ) April 28, 2011 JUDGE ajay-I