CWP(T) No.7620 of 2008 17.04.2009 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr.Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. It is not disputed by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General that the present lis is covered under the judgment rendered in titled Rattan Lal versus State of Haryana, AIR 1987, SC 478. Accordingly, the petitioner is held entitled to the salary for the vacation period. Consequently, the respondents are directed to release the salary for the vacation period as per the definitive law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court within a period of eight weeks from today. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. April 17, 2009. (rkv)