2J) \6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH') WRIT PETITION N0.[^> OF 2005 PETITIONER Orissa Concrete & Allied Ind Ltd, (Unit II) Industrial Area, Bhanpuri, PO Birgaon, r Raipur (Chhattisgarh), through - Its, ••- . A " »^• • • • • ^ ^•^•••^ l.-i"^' \^^ ...^"tiCCt^"....-'^ ^^^ Director Navin Agrawal, aged about 35 years, son ofC.B. Agrawal ^^^•"i VERSUS ^' RESPONDENTS 1. Coal India Limited,Through: Its Chairman, 10,Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata, (West Bengal). rf^^l (5.^.^ -^— ~^-k<%r^, kKUR ^-^ SINGH E.'^!idtorGener?'y^n^ IlHMTISGARH ^^^_ E!SS^BNsp^iG.S4 2. Chairman cum Managing Director, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, 10 Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil .and District Bilaspur(C.G.). 3. The General Manager (Sales), 10 Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil a,nd District Bilaspur (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Ministry of Industrial Development, D.K.S.* B^iawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Union of India, through - Secretary, Ministryof Industrial Devtelopment, New Delhi. 4. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3^r ^II^M^, ^Tfa^^K?, ^rray ^ii^i^?i®n Nl^dl'shNitb^"'-''' '4y' •''""' ^: 200 ^ i^'5^ %^-e 3TI^T^T f^T[^3T^?T $b^i<=t)^rf?cT 3TT^T ^cfTW^T^cT 1^ .<=hl^Id^frT ^l^^lT ^* te^ <I^1«1< ^3Tf^T3TI^T 13.04.2005: Shri Y.C.Sharma, learned c Shri V.Deshmukh, iearned Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Shri Thakur Vijay Singh, 1@^ india/respondent No. 5. >unsel for the petitioner. ^ounsel for rospondQnts 1 to 3. jeajrned P.L. for the State/respondent 4. irned Sr. Standing Counsel for Union of The petitioner has filed the| respondents whereby the respon(|ents supply of coal to the petitioner without the industry ofthe petitioner. instant petition against the action of the 1 to 3 have suddenly stopped the any notice resulting in stoppage of Learned oounsel for the p^t petitions w©re fited before this similar relief and this Court by| disposed of all the petjtions with aj a notice dated 16.12.2004 issuedl be atlowed to oontinuo supply of coun3el further ^ubmits that the c^ with the order passed by this 1083/2005, 1084/2005, 1085/200)5 1089/2005, 1090/2005, 1177/20^ 1217/2005, 1225/2005, 1226/20051, ^titioner submits that number of identieal ;ourt against the respondents for the a common order dated 01.04.2005 direction that till the decision in reply to |by the respondents, the petitioner shall ^oal as per linkage conditions. Learned ^se of the petitioner is squarely covered dourt in Writ Petition Nos. 1082/2005, 1086/2005, 1087/2005, 1088/2005, )5, 1178/2005. 1179/2005 1216/2005, 1227/2005, 1228/2005 and1260/2005. Learned counsel for the submits that the case of the pe|;ltjoner petitioners of the connected writ this Court and therefore, the instaht r^spondents 1 to 3 Shri V.Deshmukh, is identical to the case of the p^titions v^ich have been disposed of by petition may be ^isposed ofwith the ?y^) XI-HC-22 CT^T^T {^rt^"3T^T $b^i<=h^f??T ^TT^)^ r'-/ ,^" s •^' 3^ ^iqicnq, ^Tn<-i4i<o, f^rray HTWTT^WT^ / 31(^1 ^5{^ ^.M.-i-...l.^.. ^ 200^ 3T1^T?^rT^K^1N — ^- simiiar direction as has been pa^ counset for the respondents sub|mits document before th©authority in supply of coal as per linkage condi] |sed in the aforesaid petitions. Learned that if the petitioner has filed the flhat casQ he may b©allowed to continue Eions. in view of the above subhrssion petition is being disposed of by t|' petitioner has filed the documents 16.12.2004 which has also been allowed to continue supply of coal In vi©w of th© above, it petitioner shall be allowed to c conditions. Consequently, all the p disposed of. , cbl^d41'1^1wT^fel^<Rl^l< ^^Tf^T^n^T of counsel for the parties. the is Court with a direction that the jfth@ before the authority as required on iled in this Court, the petitiQner shaii be ;s per linkage conditions till verification. is directQd that pending decision th© intinue supply of coal as per linkage Accordingly, the petttion stajids disposed of. ^ndlng appllcatlons shad also stand Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ('ft^^^-)