HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BUSinJR APPELLANTS 1 (Claimants before the railway Claims Tribunal Bhopal) 2 MA(CtNo. 211 of 2010 Smt. Sevati Bal Chandra, Wd/o Late Sh^mghan Lal Chandra, aged about 35 years, occupation-heuse hold lady. Smt. Prabha Devi, D/o late Shatrughan Lal Chandra, aged about 19 yeare. MinorKu. Ramayan, D/o Late Shrtiighan Lal Chandra, aged about 14 ysars, occupation student. Minor guardian through : Natural Mottier Smt-Sevati Bai Chandra. Minor Gomati @ Chameli, D/o Shatryghan Lal Chandra, aged about 12 yeass. Minor guardian throi^h : Natural Msther Smt. SevaB Bai Chandra. Minor Ku. Geeta Kumari Chandra, Bto Shatrughan Lal Chandra, aged about 9 years. MinorGuardian- Through : Natural Mother Snrt. Sw/ati Bai Chandra. 1 to 5 are all residents of villa^ Chorbhatti, Post Ja(aipur, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (CG). Kartik Ram S/o Late Shhr Prasad Chandra, occupation-culth^ator, R/o Village ChorbhatU, Post Jaljaqiur, Distt. Janjgii- Champa(CG). Versus The Secretary, Unien of India, Through: General Manager, South East Centrat Raihway, Zonal Head Quarter, Btespur (CG) (SEC Raihway, Blaspur). Appeal under Section 23 of the Railwav Claims Tribunsd Act. 1987. DB: Hon'ble Shri Jusfice T.P. Sharma & Hon'ble ShriJustice N. K. Agarwal,JJ RESPONDENT Pre^nt : None appeare fw appeHante. Smt. Nausina Ali, Advocatefor respondent. ORDER (Passedon 26tt'day of February,201(^ 1. When the pass over case is catled out for hearing, n& representaBen is made on behalf ofthe appellapts. •^^S^^iS-S ^S3s^s^^r Leamed counsel for the respondent submit that ttie judgment has been passed by the Railwiy Claims Tribunal, Bho|»l Bench, therefore, in accordance wtth Section 23 of the Railway Clanms Tribunal Acl, 1987 (in short the Act, 1887'), the present appeal is not maintainabte before this court, Jnter alha, the appeal is maintainable before the High Court having jurisdiction over the Bench situatedat Bhopal. Section 23 of the Act, 1987 reads as under: "23. Appeals. - (1) save as provided in siA-secUon (2) and notwithstanding anything conteined in the Code of CMI Procedin-e, 1908 (5 <rf 1908) or in any other law, an appeal shall Ue from every order, not being an interlecutory order of the Claims Tribunal to the High Court having jurisdiction over the ptaoe where the Bench is located. (2) No appeal shall lie from an order pa^ed by the Claims Tribunal witti the consent of the parties. (3) Every appeal uncter this Section shatl be preferred within a period of ninety days from the date of the order appealed against." In the light of SecBon 23 of the Act, 1987, the present appeal is not maintainable before thls court and the same is dismissed as not maintainable. No order asto costs. Sd/- ^ p. sharina Judge Sd/- N.K. Agar^al Judge ihu ss;^ss^w's^a