IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4737 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR RAI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation of torture for non-fulfillment of demand but only to justify the desertion by the complainant herself, which is corroborated by the matrimonial case filed earlier on behalf of this petitioner for restitution of conjugal life. Considering the same, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 108 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)