IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4692 of 2011 RAJENDRA SAO @ MOCHHU SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 05.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 47A of the Excise Act. It is alleged that 10 liters of Mahua liquor and 200 Kg. of Java Mahua have been recovered. It appears from the seizure list that java Mahua has actually not been seized as it was not collectable. It appears that the seizure was made on 28.10.2010 when the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned C.J.M. on 30.10.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that moreover the petitioner was not apprehended from the place of seizure. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a 2 period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Excise Case No. 78 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist Class, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)