IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.11431-CI of 2010 in/and RFA No.4636 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:17.11.2010. Om Parkash ...Appellant Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for the applicant(s)/appellant(s). ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 [for short “the Act”] for condonation of delay of 1683 days in filing of the appeal. The only reason given in the application is that the applicant/appellant was under the impression that he is not required to file the appeal as the decision in the other cases of the similar nature would be applicable to their case also. It is also alleged that the present appeal has been filed only when the other connected appeals were allowed. To my mind, the application totally lacks bona fide. Thus, I do not find any sufficient cause much-less any merit in the present application and as such, the same is hereby dismissed and consequently the main appeal is also dismissed. November 17, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE