1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.113 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.113 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.113 OF 2004 Ansuya Ashachandra Jhaveri ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.R.D.Mishra Advocate for Petitioner CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 16TH MARCH, 2005. DATE: 16TH MARCH, 2005. DATE: 16TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The main relief sought for by the Petitioners is the matter of advertisement on Mulchand Bhavan building. It is the Petitioner’s case that if no hoardings/boards are allowed he will be in financial loss. . The issue of hoardings/sign boards on heritage buildings is now covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court. Considering that it will not be possible for this Court to consider reliefs as prayed for by the Petitioner herein contrary to what is said in the earlier judgment, as it will amount to reviewing the Judgment of the Division Bench. Under the rules this Bench cannot do so. . In that light of the matter this would not 2 be a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. We however, make it clear that it will be open to the Petitioners either to apply for review if in law it so maintainable or to take such other steps as the Petitioners may be entitled to. . With the above observations the Petition stands disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)