IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5326 of 2010 CHULHAI MAHTO S/O LATE PURAN MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE – MADHOPUR ROSAN BHISHA, P.S - DUMRA , DISTRICT - SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, SITAMARHI 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, SITAMARHI 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, DUMRA, DISTRICT - SITAMARHI. 5. MAUJE MAHTO, S/O LATE RAUDI MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE – MADHOPUR ROSAN BHISHA, P.S - DUMRA, DISTRICT - SITAMARHI ----------- 02. 01.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.12.2008 passed by the Collector, Sitamarhi in Homestead Revision Case No.21 of 2003, Annexure-4, whereunder purcha issued in favour of petitioner his brother Ram Sewak Mahto and others in the year 1974-75 has been cancelled in compliance of the orders of this Court dated 22.4.2002 passed in C.W.J.C. No.4624 of 2002 as the Collector having examined the matter found the purcha issued in favour of petitioner, his brother Ram Sewak Mahto and others to be a forged and fabricated document as the said purcha was issued under the signature of Sri Akhileshwar Singh, Circle Officer, Dumra, who stood transferred on the date of issue of purcha. Further it has been found in the order that petitioner and others were neither the privileged person nor the privileged tenant and they held and possessed land in their own name and not entitled for grant of purcha. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. Application is dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)