IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28793 of 2010 LALIT NARAYAN MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that a racket was prevailing in the bank for cash credit loan by one Serajuddin and others. After joining the Bank as Branch Manager, petitioner made every effort to stop the same and repeatedly he is being harassed by persons involved in the racket. Earlier also a Complaint Case No. 1145 of 2009 was filed by Gaffar Alam and others with allegation of demand of bribe, on failure they managed the lady complainant to file instant complaint petition with allegation of committing rape upon her. Character of this lady is doubted on the ground that she is naming her husband to different persons at different occasions. Another Complaint Case No. 744/2010 is also filed by the same complainant alleging commission of rape against her co-villager. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the instant complaint petition, there is no mention about her coming 2 to petitioner’s residence with her brother-in- law while on S.A. she states about presence of her Dewar also. If really rape was committed, there should be some reaction on her behalf after coming out from petitioner’s residence to her brother-in-law. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Brijesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui in Complaint Case No. 1150 ©/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)