CWP No.1855 of 2007. 22.09.2008 Present: Ms. Radhika Gautam, Advocate vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.4. It is not disputed by the parties that notice as stipulated in clause 7 of the terms and conditions of Service (Annexure-A) has not been issued to the petitioner before terminating her services. In view of this admitted position, the order dated 28th August, 2007 is quashed and set aside. The effect of setting aside of the order dated 28th August, 2007 would be that her appointment will be revived and she is to be permitted to discharge the duties of Anganwari worker. It is clarified that if any person is issued appointment letter after the order dated 28th August, 2007, it shall not be given effect to. However, the liberty is reserved to the respondents to terminate the services of the petitioner in accordance with law. In view of the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. September 22, 2008. (sck)