IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3332 of 2002 Between: Yerrabelli Saidaiah, S/o.Venkataiah, R/o.H.No.24-52, Nehrunagar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Engineer (PWD) (R&B), Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. 2 The Chief Engineer (R&B) Roads, Erramanzil, Hyderabad. 3 J.Rama rao, S/o.Pullaiah, R/o.Pulipadu(V), Gurijala (M), Guntur District. 4 Ananathula Narasimha Rao, S/o.Devaiah, R/o.Miryalaguda. (R4 is impleaded as per court order dt.24/4/2002 in WP MP NO.8080/2002). .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction (i) directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for awarding of the lease hold right in respecct of bridge across river Krishna near Wadapally on Nakrekal Wazeerabad road in Km 66/0 for the years 2002-2004 in favour of the petitioner by fixing the lease hold bid amount at Rs.225 lakhs for duration of 24 months commencing from 1.4.2002 and 31.3.2001 or (ii) declare the order of the 2nd respondent in proceedings no.32139/T&P.3/TA.3/200204 dt.8.2.2002 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the constitution of India and set-aside the same and direct the respondents to conduct auction of lease hold right afresh in accordance with law and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.SRINIVASA REDDY (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1 and 2: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS ( Not present) Counsel for Respondent No.3: None appeared. Counsel for Respondent No.4: M/s S. Bharat Kumar.( Not present). The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: When this writ petition came up for hearing on 30.6.2005, there was no representation on either side and, accordingly, it was adjourned to 5.7.2005, under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, there is no representation on either side. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 5.7.2005 CVM To, 1. 2 CCs to G.P. for Roads and Buildings, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 2. 2 CD copies. 3 The Executive Engineer (PWD) (R&B), Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. 4 The Chief Engineer (R&B) Roads, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.