{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4537 OF 2009 The Secretary, Balsankra Krida Mandal, A’Bad PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.V.L.Dhobale, Advocate for petitioner (Absent) Mr.Dilip Patil Bankar, AGP for State ....... [CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. and A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 18th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. None for the petitioner even at third call. The dismissal of the petition in default would not serve the ends of justice, as it invariably results in moving application for restoration which creates strain on the registry. Hence, we propose to decide it on its own merits. Having gone through the petition, we found that this petition is directed against order dated 15.09.2008 whereby the proposal of the petitioner for permission to run primary school came to be rejected for the reasons recorded therein. Having gone through the impugned order, we do not find any perversity in the {2} same. The view taken is reasonable and possible view. No case is made out to entertain this petition. The same is dismissed. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [V.C.DAGA, J.] drp/wp4537-09