IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.348 of 2009 SIYA RAM YADAV . Versus MISHRI LAL THAKUR,V.C,L.N.M UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA & ORS. ----------- 7/ 09/02/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid his legitimate dues in accordance with the order of the Court read with the subsequent order in M.J.C. No.1135/08. The payment was to be made on monthly basis. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that both the orders specifically take notice that he shall be entitled to the payment for the dates that he delivered a lecture. In absence of any quantification of the amount for payment and directions given on that basis, coupled with the direction in M.J.C. No.1135/08 to represent before the authorities for quantification of the dues in accordance with the regulations as may be applicable, certain payments having admittedly been made but not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, the Court finds it difficult to start an enquiry in contempt jurisdiction for quantification of payment. Once payment has been made, the order stands complied. - 2 - If the petitioner is aggrieved by the quantification of the payment, his remedy lies in a fresh writ application only. The contempt proceedings stand dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)