:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.411 OF 2006 PETITION NO.411 OF 2006 PETITION NO.411 OF 2006 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Petitioner. Versus Smt.Rashida A. Khan ...Respondent. Shri Bhor i/b R.A.Malandkar for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE DATE DATE : 31st JANUARY, 2006. : 31st JANUARY, 2006. : 31st JANUARY, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . After hearing Shri Bhor appearing for the petitioner, I find no reason to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with an order of the trial Court allowing amendment to the plaint in the Suit filed by the respondent. All that the amendment seeks to incorporate is subsequent developments and prayer for reconstruction of the demolished premises. Merely because the amendment is granted does not mean that the merits of the amended pleas are to be accepted or will be accepted. The petitioner is at liberty to file the additional Written Statement, upon the amended plaint being served; and six weeks time is granted for that purpose. Petition stands dismissed. ( S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)