IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11681 of 2009 Between: Killi Satya Venkata Durga Prasad S/o. Appa Rao R/o. Sri Sai Soubhagya Apts., Flat No.301, Prajashakthi Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Vijayawada Krishna District. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police Central Zone Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3 The Station House Officer Nunna Police Station Nunna, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4 Sri Ram Kumar Sub-Inspector of Police Anti Gooda Squad P.S., Vijayawada, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.L.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and insisting the petitioner to agree the offence in Cr.No.403 of 2009 on the file of the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to forbear from initiating any illegal proceedings against the petitioner and grant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main writ petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.15048 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th JUNE, 2009. kvni