1 wp3217.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3217 OF 2011 [ Narayanrao Sakharam Gadekar & Anr. vs. Vinayak Narayanrao Gadekar & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Satyajit S. Bora, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for R-1&2. Mr. D.P. Deshpande, Advocate for R-5 to7. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that, the appeal is being finally heard and is part heard. In that view of the matter, this is not appropriate stage to interfere in the proceedings and allow 2 wp3217.11 the prayer of the petitioners. However, it will be open for the Counsel for the petitioners to argue the matter and file written notes of argument before the lower appellate Court. Writ Petition is disposed of. . It is needless to clarify that, if the Counsel for the petitioners file written notes of argument, the lower appellate Court will consider the same. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11