IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 14996 of 2009(O) -------------------------------------- EP.208/2006 of MUNSIFF COURT,CHAVAKKAD .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SHANTHA, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. KONACHAN SREEDHARAN, MARATHAYOOR DESOM, PAVARTTY AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. ASISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES/ARBITRATOR CUM SALE OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR. 2. CHAVAKKAD TALUK RURAL HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REG. NO.L.344, PAVARATTY, CHAVAKKAD. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.14996 of 2009 - O --------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: “i) To issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P1 issued by the 1st respondent. ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent to extend the benefit of the One Time Settlement Scheme to the petitioner. iii) To direct the respondents to grant instalment facilities to the petitioner to remit the amount claimed as per Ext.P1” 2. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner and also the second respondent, this Court had passed an order on 4.6.2009 allowing the petitioner to pay the entire amount due to the second respondent, society, within a period of six weeks and file a representation before the society for its consideration for reconveying the property sold in execution. It is submitted that substantial portion of the amount has been paid, but, still, W.P.(C).No.14996 of 2009 - O 2 liability on the transaction has not been fully discharged. Learned counsel for the second respondent has no objection in granting further time of two weeks to the petitioner to discharge the liability and in case such liability is discharged, the respondent has no objection in reconveying the property, delivery of which was obtained pursuant to court sale. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire liability can be closed within a period of three weeks. 3. Having regard to the submissions made, petitioner is granted further time of three weeks from the date of this judgment to discharge the outstanding liability on the transaction due to the second respondent. Petition is closed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE. bkn/-