IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 6896 of 2008 Decided on: 06.09.2010 Ramesh Chand …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening development. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 6, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?