IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1420 of 2009 NAND KISHORE SINGH S/O LATE CHANDRIK KUMAR SINGH J.M.C.S.I., STATE BANK OF INDIA, POSTED AT KADAMKUAN, BRANCH TILL 3,08.2002 AND RESIDING AT C.C.3, P.C. COLONY, KANKERBAGH, PATNA-20. .. Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CENTRAL BOARD CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HEAD OFFICE, BOMBAY 2. 2. THE CHEIF GENRAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, AT JUDGES COURT ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, FRASER ROAD, PATNA-1 4. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, REGION-I & IV, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, FRASER ROAD, PATNA-1 5. THE CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, KADAMKUAN BRANCH, PATNA- 800004. … Respondents/Respondents ------ For the appellant : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv. For the respondent : Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. ----------- 3. 15.04.2010 I. A. No. 7164 of 2009. This is an application for condonation of delay of 5 years and 190 days in preferring this appeal. Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for respondent- Bank. Be it noted, what has been stated that the application for review was filed forming the subject matter of Civil Review No. 37 of 2004 for reviewing the order dated 11.2.2004 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12993 of 2003. 2 Initially, the writ petition was filed challenging the order of transfer dated 3.8.2002 whereby the appellant had been transferred from Region No. 1 to Region No. IV with a further stipulation that the competent authority of Region No. 4 would give him a posting. Learned single Judge declined to interfere and the review faced dismissal. Ordinarily, we would advert to the merits of the application for limitation but Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the employer respondent submitted that the services of the appellant has already been dispensed with. In view of the aforesaid, there is no justification to dwell upon the application for condonation of delay as well as the merit of the appeal and accordingly both stand dismissed in limine regard being had to the subsequent events. kanchan (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)