gst 1 wp2319-2273.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 2319 OF 2011 Adhir Chitaman Thakur... .... .... ..Petitioner. V/s Manubhai Wadilal Shah & Ors. .... ... ..Respondents. Mr.K.K.Malpathak, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Patil, Adv. For R. No.1. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 7th April, 2011 PC: The only ground on which the impugned order is challenged is that by the amendment the relief which is beyond limitation has been permitted to be incorporated in the suit. 2. The respondent-defendant can very well either by filing additional written statement or by amending the written statement raise the ground that the relief claimed is beyond limitation and if such a ground is raised the learned trial Court would be bound to decide the issue of limitation on the basis of evidence that would be led on behalf of the parties. Writ petition stands disposed with aforesaid observations. gst 2 wp2319-2273.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 2273 OF 2011. Adhir Chitaman Thakur... .... .... ..Petitioner. V/s Manubhai Wadilal Shah & Ors. .... ... ..Respondents. Mr.K.K.Malpathak, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Patil, Adv. For R. No.1. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 7th April, 2011 PC: In view of the order passed in Writ Petition No.2319/11 today, nothing survives in this petition. Hence writ petition stands disposed of.