IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27216 of 2010 JAINT KUMAR PANDEY @ JAYANT KUMAR PANDEY, SON OF SURESH PANDEY. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 10.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and admittedly his marriage had taken place in the year 2006 whereas his wife died in mysterious circumstance on 20.08.2009. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of trial, almost all the witnesses have stated that deceased died on account of her ailment. Learned counsel for the petitioner also points out that a partition suit bearing Partition Suit No. 310 of 2010 has been filed by father of the petitioner and in the aforesaid partition suit the informant has been examined as defendant witness no. 3 and in the said suit he has clearly admitted that his sister died on account of her ailment. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with above stated Kutumba P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)