HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETITION CC) No. 5745of20_07 Ku. Ganga Yadav D/o Shri Shivnafh Yadav, Aged about 16 yeai-s, Wo Viliage & P.0. Barpali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Represented by her father, Shri Shivnath Yadav, S/o Shri Narsing Yadav, Aged about 42 years, R/o Village P.0. Barpali, Distt. - Korba (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. Chhattisgai-h Board of Secondary Education, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Principai, Govt. Hi^i School, Barpali, Distt. - Korba(C.G.) 3. Gautam Kumar Ratre S/'o Ram Prasad Ratre, Aged 18 years, R/o ViUage Baipali, Distt. Janjgu-.Champa (CG) Student of Govt. H.S. School, Barpali, Appeared in Higli Court Certificate Examination, 2007 for 10th Class Examination bearing Roll No. 72503616. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Asnihofri, J. Present: Smt. MeenaShastri, Advocateforthepetitioner. Sliri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rirdd Tanirakar, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 1. ORALOROER (Passed on 27thday of November, 2008) 1. I.A. No. 3. This is an application for taking tfae amended copy of the petition on record. The application is ordered as prayed for. 2. It is submitted by leamed counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 that the amended marks-sheet has already been issued to the petitioner aad as such- nothing remains for adjudication in this matter. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner while admitting that the amended marks-sheet has been issued, submits that a compensation for delay in issue ofamended marks-sheet mav be ordered. 3. Having regard to the facts situation ofthe case, keeping in view fhe fact that amended mark-sheet has akeady been issued to the petitioner, it is not a case where delay should be compensated by directing payment of compensation to the petitioner. 4. In view ofthe above, this petition stMids disposed of. No order asto costs. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge