.•''•^' ^s>y ^ WNfiLE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S} No. ^)^)6 6 /2011 PETITIONER : Gokul Prasad Dinkar, S/o Shri Ramratan Dinkar, Aged about- 49 years,working as Revenue Inspector Dabhara, Distt. Janjagir champa (C.G.) VERSUS ^' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through- its Secretary, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. 'Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Commissioner, O/o. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. 'Collector, Janjagir champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS y' ^ ^.&^; y ^ ^y^- ^^ < PETIT10NER HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRiT PETITiON (S) No. 5350 OF 201 1 Gokui Prasad Dinkar RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 12th day of September, 2011) 1. At the ver^ outset, Shri Sao,learned counsei appearing for the State/respondents, on instructions, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/1) impugned herein, has not been passed by a competent authority In accordance with Ruie 20, Part !i, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustalnable in law and shaii not be given effect to. 2. !n vlew of the above submlssion made by Searned State counsel, according to iearned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexur® P/1) is quashed. However, iiberiy is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, If So advised, in accordance wlth law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. 4. Tne vmt petition isallowed. No order asto costs. -€rou> ashok 1