IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42008 of 2011 Raja Ram Son of Late Amichand Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 23.12.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 324, 323, 435, 336 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that before absconding, the petitioner attended the court for a number of years despite it the case did not come to a conclusion, let the petitioner above named be released on bail if charge has been framed or after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge IXth, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sessions Trial No.1529 of 1994 arising out of Garakha P.S. Case No.51 of 1991, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Rajendra Ram, son of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any - 2 - other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of nine months since the case is of the year 1991 and pendency of case entails untold miseries upon the accused persons as well as the prosecution, for which the Trial Court (Additional Sessions Judge IXth, Saran at Chapra) is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order to the S.P., Saran at Chapra and the S.P., Saran at Chapra is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )