IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS No. 932 of 2008 Smt. Sakuntla Devi …Petitioner. Versus State & Ors. ………Respondents. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 19th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has prayed for a Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 25.7.2008 and 26.4.2008 contained in Annexure No. 5 and 6 to the writ petition. 2. The prayer no. 1 made in the writ petition appears an innocuous one, and both the parties have given their consent to decide the same finally, therefore, without going into the merit of the controversy, respondent no. 2 is directed to decide the representations of the petitioner contained in Annexure No. 5 & 6 to the writ petition within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. (P.C. Verma, J.) 19.9.2008 Rathour