IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2009 / 30TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 675 of 2009(M) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32884/2006 Dated 10/07/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SUNIL KUMAR K.S, AGED 30 YEARS S/O. KARTHIKEYAN E, KADAVIL VEEDU, KODANTHURUTHU KUTHIYATHODU PO, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SMT.K.VIDYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PSC OFFICE PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAING DIRECTOR JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC, PSC, FOR R1 SRI.J.KRISHNA KUMAR, FOR R2 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 675 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No. 32884 of 2006 M ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 21st day of August, 2009 O R D E R The writ petitioner is the review petitioner. He was a candidate included in Annexure-A1 rank list published by the Public Service Commission for the appointment to the post of Land Grade Servant in various departments in Ernakulam district. From the rank list, the PSC used to advise candidates to the vacancies reported in Ernakulam district, by the Kerala Water Authority and similar institutions. The said practice was discontinued by the PSC with effect from 16.10.2006. Thereafter, the appointments to institutions like KWA, Government companies, etc. were being made from a state level rank list published by the PSC for the said purpose. In this case, though several vacancies were reported as per the interim orders of this Court, at the time of final hearing of the writ petition, it was submitted by the KWA that only 103 vacancies were available for appointing candidates from the PSC list. So, the writ petition was RP.675/09 : 2 : disposed of directing the PSC to advise candidates to those 103 vacancies in accordance with law. Now, the review petitioner, relying on Annexure-A2, submits that 281 vacancies were available and they were reported on 24.1.2007, before the expiry of the rank list on 28.1.2007. Therefore, this Court should have issued a direction to the PSC to advise candidates to those vacancies also. Since Annexure-A1 list was sent by the KWA, after 16.10.2006, the said claim of the review petitioner cannot be accepted. In the result, the review petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. to Judge