1 crap498.05 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 498 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 499 OF 2005 Anirudha s/o Vasantrao Gajamgude ...Applicant VERSUS Bhagyashri w/o Markand Dabhadgaonkar ...Respondent ..... Shri R.K.Ashtekar, advocate for applicant None for the respondent, although served ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 6 th June, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri R.K.Ashtekar, advocate for applicant. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 40 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 3.11.2004, passed by the 2 crap498.05 learned IInd Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Latur, in S.T.C.C. No. 8193 of 1999. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 40 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap498.05