IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3064 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 24/3/2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is to the following effect :- "That this application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ for permanently restraining the Respondent from taking any coercive action and from dispossessing the petitioner from his rented house and the official Respondents may be directed to unlock the house and the office room of the petitioner." Today, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.7, the landlord, with reference to his counter affidavit has submitted before this Court that the house in question which is subject matter of this writ application is still in possession of the petitioner. The police officers who some how were responsible for dispossessing the petitioner also through their counsel after filing their counter affidavit have 2 also conveyed to this court that the possession of house in question has been already been restored back to the petitioner. That by itself would be end of the matter because now the petitioner as an alleged tenant and the private respondents as proclaimed landlords will have all their rights to agitate the matter in controversy before the appropriate Civil Court which alone has the power to evict a tenant from any rented premises. With the aforementioned observation this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar