IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1688 of 2005 1. MOTI RAI Son of Late Leha Rai. 2. Vijay Rai Son of Late Lekha Rai. Both are resident of village Kumhrar Walishkan Ke Talab, P.O. Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna. 3. Sujeet Kumar Son of Moti Rai, Resident of Village Kumhrar Waliskhan Ke Talab, P.O. Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna. Versus 1. RAM LAKHAN RAI Son of Late Lekha Rai. 2. Sakal Deo Rai. 3. Indra Deo Rai. 4. Bishundeo Rai. All sons of Ram Lakhan Rai. All are resident of village Kumaharar Walish Khan Ke Talab, P.O. Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna. ----------- 24. 21.04.2011 No body appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the present Civil Revision application. However, I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs- opposite party nos. 1, 3 and 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for opposite party that as matter of fact, suit itself has finally been disposed of. Even final decree has been prepared and delivery of possession has been effected to the decree holder. In that view of the matter, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending any longer. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision application is dismissed. No costs. Anand Kr. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)