// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4107/2006 Shri Laxman Singh S/o Shri Vaijnath Singh Versus Civil Judge (J.D.) & Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh, Ajmer and Another Date of Order ::: 20.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Vinodi Lal Mathur, Counsel for the petitioner Shri Vishwajeet Mantri, Counsel for respondent No.2 #### By the Court:- Admit. Shri Vishwajeet Mantri, Advocate, appears for the contesting respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 is only a formal party, therefore, its service is dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for permanent and prohibitory injunction in respect of disputed property in the trial court; during the pendency of that suit, the defendant-petitioner filed an application under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC for amendment in the issues. The trial court, vide its impugned order dated 28th March, 2006 partly allowed the application. The Issue No.3 was amended but the // 2 // application in respect of other issues was rejected. Being aggrieved with the rejection of the application in respect of other issues, the defendant-petitioner has preferred this writ petition. I have examined the impugned order passed by the trial court in the light of submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and, after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//