$ CD (Lg [6% IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.'P;(§) No. r MgB€ v OF 2009. gangia Banoh ' PETITIONER Josaph Chako, Son of Shri AJLmk¢ . y aged about 42 years, Lecturer, Higher Secondary School Pondi, Block—Dondi, D‘istx'icLDurg, (C. G. VERSUS W State of Chhattisgarh, - : 1 . Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur District— Raipur (C. G.) Principal, HigherSecondary School Pondi, District Durg, (C. G.) Smt. Chitra Bhattacharya, W/o. Not known, Lecturer, Higher, Secondary School, Pondi, Distric Durg (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 CONSTITUTION OF INDI The petitioner begs to submit as under:— ) RESPONDENTS , t 26 OF THE A ......‘IVIQQ5DV31$£.. £0 1112007 mm mmm mwewm awr'mm : LE SHRI JUSTICE 'PRETINKER DIWAKER 02.99.2009 Shli Somkailt Verma, cou nsfil for 1:116 peiitioner. Shri Sumgsh Baja}, GA. far the State. Challenge in the presen petition is to the order dated ) 3.8.200§ (Annexure P/ 1) by w ’Ch the earlier transfer order of has been canceiled by the Modem Higher Secondaxy Sch S€conda1y School, Pondi, Distt. said order the petitioner was relievedt from Dondi on 1.8.2009 and had joined at Pondi on 3.8.2009 and alt of a sudden the order impugned dated 3.8.2009 has been issued. His faither contention is that there is no illegality in the order dated 30.6.2009 and the same has been cancelled Without. position. He submits that one omtent No.4 who is aiso an. working at Pondi therefore the‘ t order impugned, are totally / coasidefmg the correct factual Smt. Cbitra Bhatacharya ra$g employee of tribal departxnent is reasoras as mentioned i11 the incorrect. x? i116 psritioner dated 30.6.20 mspondxant No. 1. Contention of the couns 1 for the petitioner is that vide. order dated 30.6.2009 the p.titioner was transferred from I, Dondi, distt. Durg to Higher Burg and in compiiaxlce of the 'mm(a§i3aim m ..1A1:».Q:..c:?>.mag)ai 20047 MW<W) WWW ‘2/ Contention of counsel fo WW§wm *Wm r the State is that let the 1:0 the respondent No.1 and 3rdance with law. petitioner make a representatior ‘ the same wauld’bs decided in acc‘ . w Counsel for me petifj l {1 Accordingly, the petition is fhe petitioner to make a represen days from The date of receipt of ti would be (lecidecl within a period its receipt. Till then the impugned to and the petitioner be allowed present place of posting. to make a representau’on. However he submits that till his representation is decided, the petitioner may ”be g; 3n€r agrees iven some protective orc‘ter. disposed of with a direcn‘on to ation within a period of seven te copy of this order, the same ‘ of two weeks from the date of order shall not be given edect to perform his duties in the Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker‘ Judge