IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15589 of 2009 KRISHNA BIHARI PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the Branch Manager of the Bank apprehending arrest in a Police case under Baghaila P.S. Case No. 31 of 2008 under Sections 419, 420, 406, 409, 467, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the loans have in fact been disbursed to the beneficiaries. Counsel for the State from the case diary points out that the petitioner has an antecedent in Beghaila P.S. Case No. 18 of 2008 with similar accusation against him of irregularities in disbursement of loan causing financial loss to the Bank which in the present case stated to be valued at approximately Rs. 12,041,204/-. Because of his antecedent alone, this Court considers it sufficient to hold that he is not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)