THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.398 of 2010 Date: 05-02-2010 Between Gandreddi Padma … Petitioner/Petitioner No.2 and 1. Pathivada Nageswara Rao and another … Respondents/Respondents 3. Pathivada Atchamma and 2 others (Respondents 3 to 5 are not necessary) … Respondents/Petitioners 1, 3 and 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.398 of 2010 Oral Order: Heard Sri V.V.Prabhakara Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. The revision is directed against the docket order and decree dated 08-12-2009 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Kaikalur, Krishna district in dismissing the application I.A.No.418 of 2009 in O.S.No.370 of 2005 filed for reopening the plaintiffs’ side evidence. 3. The petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in the suit before the Court below. 4. From a perusal of the impugned order, it could be seen that both sides adduced the evidence, marked their documents and reported that there was no further evidence to be adduced and further that after the closure of the evidence on both sides on 29-10-2008 as many as 6 adjournments had been granted for arguments, subsequently arguments also were heard and the matter was reserved for judgment and at that point of time, the present application came to be filed. 5. From the above facts put on record in the impugned order by the Court below, I find absolutely no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. 6. For the foregoing, the revision is devoid of any merit and accordingly, the same is liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, the revision is dismissed, at the stage of admission, confirming the order under revision. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 05th February, 2010. Ak