IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34080 of 2011(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. DEEPAK C.,THODADAKODE HOUSE, PUTHUKODE P.O, PALAKKAD. 2. RAHUL S.M, THODAKODE HOUSE,PUTHUKODE P.O, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SMT. MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR THENHIPALAM,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 673 635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VPV WPCNO.34080/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 1ST PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS. RS 420/REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPIES OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF 2ND PETITIONER DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS. RS 420/REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE VPV ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 34080 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioners, submit that they appeared for B.Tech 5th and 3rd semester examination and failed in one paper. They submitted Exts. P2 and P5 applications for revaluation and scrutiny and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks and scrutiny within two weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Kp/-