IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 298 of 2005 In Letters Patent Appeal (Stamp) No. 27553 of 2005 In First Appeal No. 1099 of 2002 In L.C. Suit No. 2914 of 2001 Mr. Avinash Thodankar, Mumbai .. Applicant V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for the Applicant Ms. Nisha Dabhade for the Respondent No. 1-BMC. Mr. Y.R. Shah for the added Respondent Mr. P.S. Dani for the Respondent CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 09.12.2005. DATED : 09.12.2005. DATED : 09.12.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondents. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide, hence Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)