THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31404 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of respondents 2 to 4 in interfering with the civil disputes between him and the fifth respondent in respect of land admeasuring Acs.3.25 cents covered by Survey Nos.89 and 90 situated at Udegolam, Kanekal Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that as the fifth respondent having executed an agreement of sale failed to execute registered sale deed, he filed a suit for specific performance and it is pending. It is stated that when the claim of the petitioner is pending consideration before the civil Court, at the instance of the fifth respondent, respondents 1 to 4 are insisting him to vacate the land in question. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that a complaint was lodged by the fifth respondent on 13.09.2010 against the petitioner and others complaining that the accused beat him and caused injuries to him and it was registered as Crime No.69 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC read with 34 IPC. It is further submitted that the petitioner, who is A.2 therein, was arrested on 23.09.2010 and remanded to judicial custody and after completion of investigation, final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rayadurg, Anantapur District, and it was taken on file as C.C.No.128 of 2010. With regard to allegation against respondents 1 to 4 that they are interfering with the civil disputes, it is submitted that except investigation into the complaint in question, which was registered as Crime No.69 of 2010, respondents 1 to 4 have not interfered with the civil disputes existing between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. When the police registered the complaint lodged by the fifth respondent against the petitioner, investigation conducted into it cannot be termed as interference by respondents 1 to 4. In any event, with regard to the land in question, it is not possible to record any finding on the plea of the petitioner that he is in possession of the land as the same is a matter seized up before the civil Court for adjudication. Placing on record the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4 based on the written instructions that there is no interference with regard to civil disputes, which exist between the petitioner and the fifth respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 20th DECEMBER, 2010. kvni