IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2007 / 12TH POUSHA, 1928.\ WP(C).No. 30205 of 2005(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- 1. MARIAMMA JACOB, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, ASSUMPTION COLLEGE, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM. 2. DR. SAJI MARIAM GEORGE, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY, ASSUMPTION COLLEGE, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM. 3. ROSAMMA JACOB, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, ASSUMPTION COLLEGE, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SMT.MEREENA JOSEPH SMT.M.M.POORNIMA RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA. R3 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.30205 OF 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT Case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are not given the monetary benefits due to them even though the University has approved their appointment by Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3(b) with effect from various dates. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. The writ petition is disposed of as follows: The second respondent shall place his objections to the grant of Selection Grade to the petitioners as approved by Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3 (b) within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon receipt of the objections from the second respondent, the third respondent shall meticulously consider each and every objection raised by the second respondent and pass a reasoned order, which shall be communicated to the petitioners and the second respondent. If the University reiterates Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3(b), the decision in Cherian Mathew's Case will govern and the monetary WPC. 30205/2005. 2 benefits due to the petitioners under Exts.P3, P3(a) and P3(b) shall be disbursed to the petitioners without any further delay. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.