IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4760 of 2010 PAPPU KUMAR SON OF LAXMI SAH @ SAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code. By an earlier order dated 21.8.2009 passed in 28072 of 2009 the petitioner had been refused bail with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after having remained in custody for one year, at the time of which he was supposed to specifically state about his antecedents. The petitioner has completed the period of one year having been in custody since 28.1.2009 and it has been stated that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case which arose out of the same occurrence, In view of the liberty given, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sushri Jyoti Kumari, J.M. 1st Class, Patna in Digha P.S.case No.10 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the - 2 - proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )