IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7856 of 2008. Decided on: 06.12.2010. _____________________________________________________ Bhan Chand. … Petitioner. Versus M.D. Forest Corporation and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. J.R. Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner is seeking regularization since he is working with the respondent-Corporation since 1st August, 1989. It has come in the reply filed by the respondent/Corporation that the case of the petitioner shall be considered on his own turn subject to availability of sanctioned posts. This reply was filed on 14th August, 2001. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, if not already considered, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. The 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits in the eventuality of his being regularised. The pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 06, 2010. (sck).