IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16202 of 2011 SHANKAR RAI SON OF LATE TETAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.5.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by orders dated 11.3.2010 and 8.10.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.8395 of 2010 and Cr.Misc.No.34379 of 2010. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that there is no progress in the trial. On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the informant appears and states that when P.W.1 was being cross-examined on 16.4.2011 time was sought on behalf of the petitioner and, therefore, there is no lapse on the part of the prosecution. Considering that the petitioner was refused bail on merits, I am not inclined to review the earlier orders. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. However, the Trial Court shall not grant unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties since the same would frustrate an early disposal of the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )