CWP No. 18856 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 18856 of 2008(O&M) Date of Decision: March 16, 2009 Vijay Singh ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr.Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. Replies filed on behalf of respondent No.3 and 4 separately are taken on record. The only dispute which was raised in this case is that the petitioner's candidature was not being considered on the ground that he had not got the requisite marks. The case of the petitioner was that he had applied for reevaluation. Under the interim orders of this Court petitioner was interviewed. In the written statement the plea taken was that in case the petitioner succeeds in reevaulation that result would have to relate back to CWP No. 18856 of 2008 2 the date of original result and, therefore, in that eventuality the petitioner would have to be considered as eligible. The Kurukshetra University was impleaded as respondent No.4 to ascertain this factual aspect. In the short reply filed by the said University it has been clarified that as a consequence of the reevaluation the petitioner has been declared pass. Thus, as per the legal consequence of the averment of respondent No.3 now the petitioner would have to be considered eligible. Consequently this writ petition is allowed and the respondent No.3 is directed to consider the petitioner as eligible for the post and to declare his result if not declared till date. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 16, 2009 sunita