•^St^M..^^ ^ ''g'E^'-^l^l^, tp'al^<i<o, Rlrti^y ?niTOTa?m^—••"""••••""°"•""""""" ^L2oo 3TI^?T X^S> (y<I^q<s) OT^^Tcm^RT^ ^snOT^^TPCTt^ T ^^TTSR ^rf^T 31T^^T cbl^fc^41T1 TTT^t^f^St ^^SlK ^3rf^T3TI^$T (Sinale Bench; Hon'blte Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P. (Petition U/A 2 PETITIONERS Sanat Aged [s1 No.6349/08 26 of Constitution of India) Kumar Sahu, S/o sri Makhan Lal Sahu, |about 37 years, Occupation-working as Panch|3yat Karmi, Gram Panchayat Jhalmala, R/o Janjg Vs RESPONbENTS 1 Tanpad Panchayat Akaltara, bistrict r-Champa (CG). 1. St^ite of Chhattisgarh, Through: the t;retary, Panchayat and Social |3artment, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Se] De 2. Dir Sai 3. De ector, Panchayat and Rural Services ichanalaya, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) j)uty birector, Panchayat and Rural be^elopment bepartment, bistrict Office- Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. Zil<| Ex^ 5. w Chit Panchayat, Through its Chief cutive Officer, t)istt. Janjgir Champa Executive Officer, Janpad Pan|:hayat Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir- Chajmpa (CG) 6. Sarjpanch, (5ram Panchayat Jhalmala, Jan|pad Panchayat Akaltara, Distt. Jan|jgir- Champa. Present: Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Adv. witl Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate for r |i Mr. I.S. Sahu, Adv. for the petitioner. Ifor the State. — ^spondent No.6. mSM&S^ .-".f:t":a!% -s";& /<- fe. '" '^ ijl.1 ;^c;E[ ;;:?TTOT?53T, t?-al^-i<Kc, Ictrtlt-l^ 'qFT^T a?^^' 3:n^$T<mf^?rt<p ^sn3TT^?T^mcp Y^- J 3TT^9T q^})(^c|ij6|^) W^ 200 ?"^T$R^rf^T 3TT^^T ^- 14.11.2008 Heard. By this petition the pe|l respondent No.S-beputy bepartment, District Office- Jf( Panchayat Secretary as per pr< Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, Grievance of the petil Panchayat Karmi vide resolutioi) by the Gram Panchayat Basa|' Panchayat Karmi vide order da1 the petitioner joined the servi of the petitioner was Panchayat to the respondent N respondent No.3 vide his mem^ direction from respondent N< whether the appointments mad| can be declared Panchayat Se^ directions of the State Gover 29.8.2008. The respondent N clarified that the Panchayat Kc before 29.8.2008 may be noti birlector forwar|ded chl^fc641v1 ^l+lc)T^fcl<l ^Fji^i^ ^3Tf^T3TT^^T itioner is praying for a direction to the \ Panchayat <& Rural bevelopment anjgir-Champa to declare the petitioner as visions of Section 69 of the Panchayat Raj L993 (for short 'the Adhiniyam'). ioner is that he was duly selected as of Annexure P-2 dated 14.8.2008 passed itpur. Thereafter, he was appointed as id 25.8.2008 of Annexure P-4, whereupon, ;es on 15.8.2008 vide Annexure P-5. Case by Gram Panchayat through Janpad ).3-Deputy birector on 23.9.2008 and the dated 27.9.2008 (Annexure P-6) sought .2-Director, Panchayat & Rural Service, l^ prior to 29.8.2008 of Panchayat Karmis |:retaries after coming into force of new l|iment in this regard vide circular dated ».2 vide communication dated 30.9.2008 'mis whose appointments have been made fied as Panchayat Secretaries under the ^^s^ /^^ ^^?;^5?^. I 1 \^y ^^T;:?7TOTpRT, tp-al<<-i<i<?, ROIX-I^ *im^i ^IF|T^ 3TT^^TcpTf^Tr^ cTsnan^^T^m^ h*^,i A 3TT^9Ttraz{} (^c1^<5|<g) W^ 200 ^PITST^ ^?T W^^l ^ provisions of the Adhiniyam. been by the respondent No.3 a|i Panchayat to initiate fresh Karmi. Mr. Bhatia, learned coun|sel petitioner files fresh represen|tation birector, for redressal of his shall be considered and decidedl four weeks from the date of re|c In view of the above with a direction to the petition^ the grievances raised in this along with certified copy of th^i made, the respondent No.3 is with law within a period of foi representation. Certified copy as per rule|s. IHowever, till date no such declaration has \d on the contrary he is directing the Oram p|roceedings for appointment of Panchayat sublmission, <r>i^fo<Tl<i ^i^oT^'fc1^ ^K»i^i>< ^3Tf^:r3TT^$T for the State submits that in case the before the respondent No.3-beputy jrievances raised in this petition, the same by the respondent No.3 within a period of |ceipt of the representation. i, the instant petition is disposed of ;r to make fresh representation, raising all Ipetition, before respondent No.3 herein is oMer and on such representation being lirected to decide the same in accordance (r weeks from the date of receipt of the Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge