1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5054 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors. .. Petitioners Versus Ramnath Laxman Pathave and ors. ..Respondents Mr.K.J.Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for petitioners CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 14th June 2010 PER COURT : 1. The petitioners being aggrieved by the judgment of the Aurangabad Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, dated 7.7.2009, in Original Application No.688 of 2007, have filed the present petition. 2. We have heard Mr.K.J.Ghute Patil, learned Assistant Govt.Pleader on behalf of the petitioners. It is urged by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the forest labourers who are regularised w.e.f. 3.10.1986 by virtue of the Government Resolution of the even date are not entitled for the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 20.7.2001. The Tribunal has come to the conclusion that neither the Government Resolution which created the supernumerary posts of forest 2 labourers by which the applicants before it were absorbed excludes its operation of the promotional avenues nor does the Government Resolution dated 20.7.2001 exclude its operation to the forest labourers who had been regularised by virtue of the Government Resolution dated 3.10.1986. 3. With the assistance of the learned Assistant Govt.Pleader we have perused the findings recorded by the Tribunal and upon such perusal we do not find any perversity in reasoning of the Tribunal to warrant any interference in this writ petition filed by the petitioners. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition being sans merit is summarily dismissed with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/5054.10wp)