IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13271 of 2010 1. KAMLESHWARI PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAMRUP PRASAD SINGH R/O VILL.- BARIARPUR (BASTI), P.O. + P.S.- BARIARPUR, DISTT.- MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DISTT.- MUNGER 4. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR, BIHAR EDUCATION PROJECT, DISTT.- MUNGER 5. THE DIRECTOR, BIHAR EDUCATION PROJECT COUNCIL, BILTAN BHAWAN, PATNA ----------- 02. 08.04.2011 There are certain materials which compelled the respondent to suspend the petitioner and initiate a departmental proceeding. The forum for the petitioner would be before the authorities concerned and there may not be an occasion for this Court to interfere with the impugned order at this stage. If the petitioner satisfies the authorities with regard to the charges which led to his suspension, the matter may be dropped or else the only corollary would be holding disciplinary proceeding and consequential order dependent upon the findings. No interference is required with the suspension order. The Writ application is dismissed. It will be in the interest of justice that the issue is brought to an end at the earliest, which may also include the 2 question of departmental enquiry if the necessity for the same arises, within a reasonable time frame. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)