1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4874 OF 2010 Shri Suresh s/o Bhikaji Ingle ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri Jivan Patil, Advocate holding for Shri V.D. Sapkal, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 29th June, 2010 PER COURT : 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for setting aside the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, rendered by the Aurangabad Bench in Original Application No.375/2010 and also seeks to quash and set aside the communication dated 18.5.2010 issued by the respondents, holding the petitioner as ineligible to appear for the written examination. 2. The petitioner filed this petition during vacation and was 2 moved before the learned Vacation Judge. The learned Vacation Judge, at paragraph 4 of the order, had permitted the petitioner to appear for the written examination for the post of Reserved Sub- Inspector of Police, to be conducted on 28.5.2010. The learned Vacation Judge further directed that the petitioner shall not claim any equity on the ground that he was allowed to appear for the written examination. 3. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, learned A.G.P. states on instructions that, pursuant to the order of this Court, the petitioner was permitted to appear for the examination, but the petitioner could not succeed in the written examination and consequently, the petitioner was not called for further stages in the recruitment proceedings. In that light of the matter, therefore, according to us, since the petitioner has been declared unsuccessful in the written examination, this petition deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.) fmp/lwp487410