IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-2288 of 2010 Date of Decision:5.3.2010 Sanjay Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Pooja Bishnoi, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of U.T. Chandigarh on instructions from SI Devender Singh states that all the accused have since been acquitted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh. Accordingly, the present petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. 5.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE