IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14435 of 2009 1. VINITA KUMARI W/O SRI BRAJENDRA NARAIN R/O BELKHARA, P.S-KARPI, DISTT- ARWAL Versus 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, BARAUNI REFINERY, BARAUNI, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 2. THE EMPLOYEE RELATION OFFICER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED BARAUNI REFINERY BARAUNI- DISTT-BEGUSARAI 3. THE REGIONAL OFFICER null INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, BARAUNI REFINERY BARUNI, DISTT- BEGUSARAI ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the State : ------------- 2/ 05-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Junior Engineering Assistant-IV (Instrumentation). She appeared in the written test and became successful but could not appear in the interview as the call letter directing her to appear in the interview to be held in between 24th to 26th August, 2009 was never served on her. In this connection she invited the attention of the authorities of the Corporation who, under the impugned order dated 24.09.2009, informed the petitioner that the call-letter , directing her to appear in the interview, was despatched through Speed-post vide receipt bearing No. EE93458131 81N and if she has not chosen to appear in the interview then she has to blame herself. Perusal of the contents of the impugned letter dated 24.09.2009, Annexure-8, indicates that the authorities of the Corporation had issued call-letter dated 10.08.2009 addressed to the petitioner at her Patna - 2 - address on 11.08.2009 vide Speed post receipt bearing No. EE93458131 81N. There is no material on record to dispute such despatch, in the circumstances I have no option but to dismiss the writ petition. ( V. N. Sinha, J ) BTiwary/