Civil Revision No.4886 of 2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.7539-41-CII of 2010 in Civil Revision No.4886 of 2004(O&M) Date of Decision:25.03.2010 State of U.P. .... appellant Versus Punjab Communications Ltd. and another .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shekhar Verma, Advocate for the applicant-respondent No.1 **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): As per the averments an Ex-parte decree dated 30.1.2004 was passed agaisnt the petitioner. An application for setting aside the aforesaid ex-parte decree was filed. Petitioner also filed an application before the trial Court for ad-interim injunction whcih was dismissed vide order dated 13.9.2004. This revision petition has been filed challenging the aforesaid order. Prayer in this application is to dispose of the present revision petition having become infructuous The application is also supported by an affidavit of the applicant-respondent. Civil Revision No.4886 of 2004 2 In this application, it has been stated that the main application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC by the judgment-debtor for setting aside the ex parte decree dated 30.01.2004, itself, has been dismissed on 12.03.2010 and therefore this revision petition does not survive. Civil Misc.application is allowed and the revision petition is ordered to be dismissed as having become infructuous. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 25.03.2010 neenu