1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2236 OF 2011 (Shahbaaz Ahemed Nayeem Miyan Deshmukh .vs. The Collector, Amravati and Ors.) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 28, 2011. Heard Mr.S.T.Harkare, Adv. for the petitioner, Mr.V.A.Thakare, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr.R.J.Kankale, Adv. for respondent nos. 3 and 4. Mr.V.A.Thakare, A.G.P. states that he is still awaiting instructions. However, after hearing the learned Counsel for the respective parties, we find that the petitioner, who claims to have been appointed on compassionate ground, is seeking approval to his services. His employers/ respondent nos. 3 and 4 have filed reply pointing out that the proposal for approval is forwarded by respondent no.3 on 24.7.2006 and is under consideration. The learned A.G.P. states that he is 2 not in a position to make any statement as instructions are awaited. In this situation, we direct respondent nos. 1 and 2 to consider the proposal, if it is still pending, within a further period of eight weeks. If necessary, opportunity of hearing shall be given to respondent nos. 3 and 4 and the petitioner. If decision is already taken, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner and respondent nos. 3 and 4 within a period of three weeks from today. With liberty to the petitioner/respondents to approach this Court if they are aggrieved thereafter, we dispose of present petition. Copy of this order duly authenticated be supplied to the A.G.P. JUDGE JUDGE jais