THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 3215 of 2001 ORDER: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he was selected through a duly constituted committee as Helper in the year 1991 and joined in the said post, his services have not been regularized in the respondent Corporation, and that the first respondent rejected his case on the ground that no sanctioned posts are available in the respondent corporation. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was selected as Helper by a duly constituted committee and he is rendering service from the date of his appointment and regular pay scale was also paid to him, and hence, he prays to direct the respondents to regularize his services. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents contended that there is no sanctioned post of Helper in the respondent corporation and so the question of regularization of the petitioner does not arise. 5. It is not in dispute before this Court that the petitioner was selected as a Helper by a duly constituted committee and regular pay scales have been paid to the petitioner, and as on today, he is continuing in service. It is not a case where the petitioner was appointed by a back door method. The only contention of the respondents is that there is no sanctioned post of Helper in the respondent corporation. Therefore, whenever the Government sanctions any Helper post, case of the petitioner shall have to be considered by the respondent for regularization. 6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 03.12.2010 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 3215 of 2001 03.12.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 3215 of 2001 Dated: 03.12.2010 Between: K.Satyanarayana …Petitioner And The Managing Director, A.P. Women’s Co-op. Finance Corporation, Hyderabad & another …Respondents