:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2031 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2031 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2031 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.71 OF 2006 (L) NO.71 OF 2006 (L) NO.71 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.357 OF 2005 PETITION NO.357 OF 2005 PETITION NO.357 OF 2005 M/s.B.D.Shah & Co. ..Appellant Vs. Union of India ..Respondent Mr.Uday Sankar Samudrala for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file affidavit-of-service within a period of one week from today. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 2 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)