IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20188 of 2011 Ramesh Singh S/o Ranjan Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 06.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The informant of Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2011 has recorded his own fardbayan to the effect that on account of accident by motor vehicle, a girl was injured who later on succumbed. After that the local mob blocked the road and subsequent thereof, the mob also pelted stone upon the police personnel when they tried to intervene as well as also disturbed the rail traffic. The mob was out of 500 people whereunder 32 have named including the petitioner. Contention on behalf of the petitioner is that he happens to be an auto owner/driver and at the relevant time, he was passing through but seeing the mob frenzy, he after parking his vehicle was mere a spectator and on account thereof, he has been named. Not only this, it has also been submitted that the manner whereunder occurrence has been alleged rules out proper identification by the police and further support to be instigated by some body. Be that as it may, no specific allegation stood. Also submitted that neither the occurrence 2 was in pre-planed manner nor the petitioner happens to be a habitual criminal rather even taking into account the prosecution version, it happens to be a sudden repulsion on account of careless driving of a dumper which ultimately cost the life of an innocent girl. At the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that after all, apart from destroying the vehicle which was indulge in accident, petitioner including other indulge in pelting stone over the police personnel when they have gone there in due discharge of their duty and in course thereof, one of the police personnel sustained injury. Taking into account the manner of occurrence so alleged, petitioner Ramesh Singh, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2011, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. Safik (Aditya Kumar Trivedi,J.)