4.wp.5123.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5123 OF 2009 Kishore N. Lulla. ..Petitioner. Versus The Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and others. ..Respondents. .... Mr. S.P. Kanuga, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.S. Desai, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P., for respondent Nos.2 & 3. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH, AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATED : 16TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.:- 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation, after taking instructions from the Corporation, states that the Corporation will not take possession of the land without acquiring the land in accordance with law. He also states that so far as the structure is concerned, according to the Corporation, that structure is unauthorized and the Corporation will proceed for removal of structure in 4.wp.5123.09 2 accordance with law. He also states that the Designated Authority and the Appellate Authority have rejected the application of the petitioner for regularization of the structure. Statement is accepted. However, it is noted that the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner disputed the correctness of the statement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation that the structure is unauthorized and his application for regularization has been finally rejected by the authority. In view of this statement, now as it is clear that the Corporation is not going to remove the petitioner from the land without adopting due process of law, no orders are necessary in this Petition. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (K.K. TATED,J)