IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2010 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 22975 of 2008(S) --------------------------------------- (OP.NO.103/2008 OF FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA) .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- AMBIKA .N, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O. MADHUSOODHANAN,THIRUMANGALATH KIZHAKKETHIL KARUVATTA VADDAKKUM MURI, KARUVATTA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SMT.A.SALINI LAL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MADHUSOOTHANAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAN KUTTY, THIRUMANGALAM KIZHAKKEETHIL, KARUVATTA VADAKKUM MURI,KARUVATTA VILLAGE, KARUVATTA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 2. JANAKI AMMA, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O KRISHNAN KUTTY, THIRUMANGLATH KIZHAKKETHIL KARUVATTA VADAKKUM MURI,KARUVATTA VILLAGE, KARUVATTA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 3. KRISHNAN KUTTY, AGED 75 YEARS, THIRUMANGLATH KIZHAKKETHIL KARUVATTA VADAKKUM MURI,KARUVATTA VILLAGE KARUVATTA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. MR.MAURICE VINCENT, MR.B.SUBASH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.22975/2008-S: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE I.A. NO. 412/08 IN O.P. NO. 103/08. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE OBJECTION OF RESPONDENTS IN I.A. NO. 412/08 IN O.P. NO. 103/08. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN I.A. NO. 412/08 IN O.P. NO. 103/08 DTD. 06/06/08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & P.S.Gopinathan, JJ. ================================================== W.P.(C)No.22975 of 2008 ================================================== Dated this the 5th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. 1.There is no appearance for the parties in this writ petition. The matter arises from O.P.103 of 2008 of the Family Court, Alappuzha. An order of attachment before judgment was issued in favour of the petitioner by the Family Court. Ultimately, the conditional order of attachment was lifted and the interlocutory application was dismissed. That order was challenged in this writ petition. At the stage of admission, an interim order, as sought for, was granted. Therefore, respondents 2 and 3 stand directed not to dispose of the items of properties mentioned in the interim relief portion of this writ petition. That order was in force from WPC22975/08 -:2:- 30.7.2008. 2.Having perused the materials on record, even without the assistance of counsel appearing on either side, we are satisfied that ends of justice would be served, if the trial court expedites the consideration of the impugned matter. Accordingly, it is directed that the interim order granted by this Court on 30.7.2008 and extended from time to time will stand extended until the final disposal of O.P.103 of 2008 before the Family Court, Alappuzha. Writ petition ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. P.S.Gopinathan, Judge. sl.