S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10119/2007. Subhash Shah Vs. Addl.District Judge (Fast Track) No.1 and ors. Date of order :- 29/1/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Shri Imran Khan for the petitioner. **** The petitioner has filed this writ petition to challenge the order dated 20/9/2007 whereby the application moved by the petitioner was dismissed by the impugned-order. The petitioner had submitted an application to the effect that certain documents have wrongly been exhibited therefore, those documents so wrongly exhibited may not be read in evidence and in that regard documents so exhibited on 9/2/2005 and 10/8/2007 be de-exhibited. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application so moved by the petitioner was wrongly dismissed by the court below because those documents were exhibited by the court which otherwise were not allowed to be taken on record earlier. I have considered the submissions submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned-order. Perusal of the order reveals that the documents so exhibited were marked in the presence of the petitioner himself and no objection in that regard was raised at the time when the documents were exhibited rather on 10/8/2007, petitioner had moved an application only to the effect that he has no faith in the lower court concerned but thereafter said application was immediately withdrawn. The learned court had taken note of the fact that if a document was not earlier taken on record or was not permitted then, the petitioner should have raised objection at the time when the statements of the witnesses were recorded and documents were exhibited i.e. on 9/2/2005. The court further recorded its finding to the effect that what would be the effect of those documents for which objection has been raised, would be decided with the final decision of the case and for this reason, the matter should not be delayed as otherwise it was being tried to be delayed. I do not find any error in the impugned- order so as to call for any interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition deserves to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly. Anil (M.N. BHANDARI), J.