wp1219.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1219 OF 2011 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr.Gapat Pramod B., Adv. for petitioner. Mr.S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondents / State. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. 26th April, 2011. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.P. for the respondents. 2 The grievance of the petitioner is regarding non compliance of the order passed under the Tenancy Act and even though he has made representation to the Deputy Collector, Latur on wp1219.11 2 17.1.2010, the said authority has not decided the representation of the petitioner one way or the other. 3 The learned A.G.P. submits that in case the order of the Tenancy authority is subject matter of an appeal before the Higher authority, the order cannot be executed. The A.G.P. states that he he is not aware as to whether any appeal has been filed against the original order of the Tahsildar. However, there is no material on record to point out that any appeal has been filed. 4 Since the representation of the petitioner is pending before the Deputy Collector, we direct the Deputy Collector, Latur to wp1219.11 3 take appropriate decision on the said representation within a period of three months from today, if not already decided and communicate the same to the petitioner. While deciding the representation. the Collector may also find out whether the original order of the Tahsildar is stayed or is subject matter of any appeal or not. The Collector may accordingly take decision, according to law and communicate the same to the petitioner. Subject to what is observed herein above, the petition is disposed of. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J) kadam/