IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21468 of 2010 RABINDRA SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148,341, 342,323,504, 448, 379 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(x)(iii)(i) of S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is the case of the petitioners that the land of Khata No. 710, Plot No. 2924 measuring an area of 54 decimals were given to their father in Bhudan about twenty years ago and they were under cultivating possession. On 14.07.2009 the petitioners were ploughing the land then protest was made by the informant, the accused persons abused and assaulted the informant and Shukindra Singh entered the house of the informant and took Rs.40,000/- and Rabindra Singh torn the clothes of the victim. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the land in question is an area of 42 decimals and not 2 54 decimals as claimed by the informant. Moreover, Annexure-2/1 suggests that the aforesaid land was settled with Ram Briksha Mahto and not with the father of the informant and for the same land dispute other case was also lodged earlier. Considering the specific allegation against the petitioner no.2, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.2. The anticipatory bail application of petitioner no.2, namely, Shukindra Singh @ Sikindar Singh is rejected. So far petitioner nos. 1,3 to 8 are concerned, there is general allegation against them, moreover the place of occurrence become doubtful in view of the fact that the informant does not appear to be the owner of the land on which the occurrence is alleged. In view of the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner nos. 1, 3 to 8,namely, Rabindra Singh, Bahadur Singh, Ganaur Singh, Ram Sakal Singh, Ram Bhagat Singh, Diplal Singh and Uday Singh be released on bail on their surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from 3 today in connection with S.C./S.T. Hajipur P.S. Case No. 330 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)