Crl.M.No.M-37608 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-37608 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 22, 2010 Sakti .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.66766 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-37608 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.574, dated 30.10.2010, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Karnal, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he alongwith co-accused attacked the complainant and caused as many as 10 injuries to him as described in Annexure P4. Injury attributed to present petitioner-accused is on the head with sword. It has been contended that injury on the head has been found to be simple one. However, taking into consideration the fact that he was armed with sword and actively participated in the occurrence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the Crl.M.No.M-37608 of 2010 (O&M) -2- petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Sakti for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 22.12.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge