In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 3361 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision:January 08, 2010 Sahab Singh ---Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ---Respondents Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner *** GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 14.12.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Sessions Judge, Ambala, vide which the application of the petitioner for permission to lead additional evidence on the point of juvenility was declined. The question of juvenility was decided by learned Sessions Judge, which did not find favour with the petitioner and he came up in revision before this Court, which was allowed vide order dated 10.9.2008 passed in Crl. Misc. No. 25724 of 2008 and Crl. Revision No. 1034 of 2008. Vide that order, the case was remanded back to the trial court and the petitioner was given an opportunity to lead further evidence in support of his date of birth. He Crl. Revision No. 3361 of 2009(O&M) -2- produced evidence, after that order and the question of juvenility was again decided by learned Sessions Judge, Ambala, against the petitioner. The petitioner filed revision petition against that order which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 5.11.2009 passed in Crl. Revision No. 380 of 2009. The order passed by learned Sessions Judge to the effect that the petitioner was not juvenile at the time of commission of the offence, has attained finality. Once that order has attained finality, there is no question of allowing the petitioner to lead additional evidence in support of his age. There is no merit in the revision petition and the same is dismissed as such. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE January 08, 2010 PARAMJIT