IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 24093 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 30, 2010. Rupinder Singh @Rupinder Pal ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr. H.S.Dandi, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) CRM No.42830 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Main The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.84 dated 22.07.2010, registered under Sections 324/326/341/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Mehatpur, District Jalandhar. CRM No.M-24093 of 2010 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that, he alongwith co-accused waylaid injured –complainant, Rajdeep Singh and attacked him with Kirpan. Petitioner as well as two other co-accused were armed with one Kirpan each. They caused as many as 8 injuries on the person of injured. It has also been stated that injured remained in the hospital for 21 days. Petitioner actually participated in the occurrence. He caused two sharp edged injuries with Kirpan to the injured. No accused has been arrested so far. Weapons of offence are yet to be recovered. Hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extra- ordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused. Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant application for anticipatory bail filed by Rupinder Singh @Rupinder Lal is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of merit. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 30, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2