IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9182 of 2011 SAMID ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner was facing trial in connection with Complaint Case No. 148 C of 1997 for the offence under Sections 379 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code but it appears from perusal of the impugned order that he absconded resulting cancellation of his bail bonds on 24.08.2001 and subsequently, he was arrested and produced before the court below on 13.10.2010. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the matter has already been settled between the parties and a compromise petition has been filed in the learned court below. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.N. Jha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class/Vacant Court, Araria in connection with Complaint Case No. 148 C of 1997 subject to condition that before releasing the petitioner on bail, the learned court below shall verify the filing of compromise petition and if the compromise petition is available on the record, the petitioner shall be released in the manner as stated above. It is needless to mention here that if the compromise petition is not available on the record or the matter has not been settled between the parties, the petitioner shall not be released on bail. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )