1 appl920-10 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO.920 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.118 OF 2008 IN ARBITRATION REFERENCE NO.39 OF 2007 Sharekhan Limited .. Appellants Vs. Kamlesh Jain .. Respondent Mr.Sandip Parikh i/b Mr.Rajesh Desai for the appellants Mr.U.V.Khemkar for the respondent CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 28TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The learned Judge has rightly appreciated the point urged before him. It appears that the running account that was maintained by the petitioners showed not only that the amount is due but also showed the amount of dividend to be due to the respondent. It implied that 1000 shares which were yet to be delivered were held by the petitioners. 2 appl920-10 3. We do not find any illegality in the order. 4. Appeal is rejected. Notice of Motion No.440 of 2010 is disposed of. (D.K. DESHMUKH, J) (K.K. TATED, J)