S»NGLE BENCH ^-<: ^r. C/^-i^!^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHAmSGARH) WRn" PETITION fSt N0. U:2.1& OF 2006 PETmONER ^^^ .^^0".--'"' ^•^^...-•' •;:':<^"'' ;?.l''-w \". RESPONDENTS : 1. -R W 9^^ Smt. Reeta Kujur, Wife jifShri Parmeshwar Kujur, about 35 years, Presently working as Assistant Teacher, Middle School Bhafauli, Block Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Secretary, Department of Tribat Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, TribaL^--Development, Raipur '(C.G.). The Cotlector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Devetopment, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETrTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrrUTION OF LNDIA ^o-C0^ sesff>- • 4. 5. XI-HC-78 sn^T^iTfq^N? (T2TT3n^TstiH|i»i y Soma HltlMI ?b<4icb • ^S! '^wwt{, w!\wis, (Sicii+iy r^^ 3TI^?T4a<*> (li,c<ij,c(^IET) ^cTTWHfitTSn^T 21-8-2006 Mrs, Mala Dubey, couns Mr, Sumesh Bajaj, povernment Advocate for the State/ respondents, on advance copy.l Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ pe^ition, the petitioner has challenged her transfer order dated 30th J|une, 2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by she has been transfcrred under rationalization scheme from Middle School, Bhafauli to Middle School, Kumdabasti. Clause 7 of the rationali|zation scheme provides for appeal, if any person is aggrieved by the orde|r, Learned counsel for the betitioner submits that the petitioner has No.3, but respondent No,3 is| submits that the petitioner ha^ In the circumstances, learned directed to decide the appeal appeal ffled by the petitioner w °t)i<iF<i<fl-i wRft' if te^l' <Ri*-iii< ^srf^TR'an^T ;1 for the petitioner, already moved an appeal agE|inst the order impugned to respondent not deciding the appeal. She further been transferred contrary to the scheme. |3ounselsubmits that respondent No.3 be ()f the petitioner at the earliest, to which learned counsel appearing for t|he Statc/respondents has no objection. Having heard learned co(.insel for the parties and having regard to the facts and ciroumstances, i(espondent No.3 is directed to decidc the thin two weeks from the date of receipt of a coiy of this order. With the direction afores^id, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.Nt?.3415/2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for c^rtified copy of this order, Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge