c (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT ^- BILASPUR W.P.NO. S'^83 / 2004 Petitioner ^ Balchand Chouhan S/o Jethu Ram Aged about 27 years, R/o Village -Dokada, Tahsil -(C.G.) Bagicha»Dist : Jashapur-(C.G.) Versus Respondents l./^ v^- '^^^0V/\ - Q/-^1-'..--" s. ^ The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Home ASairs, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur-fC.G.) The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Dist : Raipur-(C.G.) The Inspector General of Police, Ambikapur, Range-Surguja / Jashapur (C.G.). The Superintendent of Police District - Jashapur (C.G.j. Reserve Inspector (Police), District - Jashpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARY AND / OR ORDER(S) AND /OR DIRECTION fSt IN THE NATURE OF WRITS 4. d-cq'-oi<4irt«,i»-nl<(i<i<»,Rl«i'(iy'< fPIc5T^*fT^ .^.:.£).~.^.t.-....ST3Lg^. ^^200^- 3n^?Ttraq5(*jcilj'cicg) 3II^?TWlR'fl* ?p)T3n^?T**ii* <ni«[c><I1i*ii*ioTffls'd'(Rt'tCK !|»3f)^I31I^?T 11.11.2005 Shri Ashok Patil, c< Shri Pankai Sh: respondents/ State. Learaed coiinsel i petitioner had appMed Constable G.T. agauist petitioner was selected s was directed to .producf woiild be considered for G.T. agaiast fhe Schedulc L^amed counsel a^ th.at the petitioner is req^ on prodlicing fhe cast^ considered for appoiutai^ Having heard leaml unsel for the petitioner. tf> ^vastava, Paael }awyer for br the petitioner submits fhat the itment to fhe • post of the Scheduled Caste quota. The ad vide orcter dated 26.10.2004 he caste certificate so tliat his case ippoiutment on the post of Constable d Caste quota. ipearing for fhe i^spondents submits lired to produce caste certificate aad inelnt records, it under challenge ia. this petitioner has been aske certificate fhe petitioner can be ot even today. •d coimsel for the parti.es and havin^ is established that fhe inain order petition is fhe notice whereby the 1 to prodiice caste ceili&cate on fhe <^ XI-HC-78 *ll*1c»l^»TT^ ^c?^l^tri^, t»Til<<i<is,Roi'Myt _^_ l^.P-^o. ^-o%51 311^91 q5W (*jc|fjk|<g) w^zoo^ 3II^?TOTR-<i<B (CT3n^?Td>«fi<b ft><*>,^ S^aTW^lfel3lrt?T — 2_ .basis of whicll •h.e~'is claimiil Constable G.T. aeainst resert right of ftie petitioner has bef interference by this Court u jurisdiction uiider Article 226 In view of the foi^goin^ petition, accordingly fhe petitii <biy'fd<S1'f*1l*<dl"ffls'<9 •(tuitci't ^aiKlian^CT appointaient on fhe post 6f ed quota. No legal or any other 'n infric.ged., which ruay caU for exercise of fhe extraordhiaiy offhe Constitution oflndia, I do not find aiiy Dierit ui this 3n is disinissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge