IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.231 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.626 OF 2008 Pramod Devram Salunkhe )..Appellant Versus Sou.Savita Sambhaji Mane & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Mandar Limaye for the appellant. Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande for respondent nos.1 to 4. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 24.6.2008 PC 1. This is a Second Appeal filed by the original obstructionist. The present respondent nos.1 to 4 have filed a suit for possession against respondent nos.5 & 6. That suit was decreed. In the execution proceedings, an application was filed under Order 21 rule 97 by the present appellant and two lower Courts have dismissed that application. The contention is that they were the tenant of the original defendants. There is no written tenancy and in so far as so-called tenancy receipts are concerned, it has been held that they are not been properly proved because neither respondent no.5 nor respondent no.6 were examined. That apart, in the original suit, respondent nos.5 & 6 did not name the appellant as a tenant. There is no substantial : 2 : question of law involved in this Appeal. Second Appeal therefore, stands dismissed. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.626 OF 2008 1. As Second Appeal is dismissed, Civil Application also stands rejected. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)