IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2263 of 2010 (M/S) WITH Interim Relief Application No. 11052 of 2010 Harish Chandra Ramkali B.Ed. College ……Petitioner. Versus N.C.T.E. and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Ms Sangeeta Miyan, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, counsel for respondent No. 2. Dated:-31-12-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 to grant recognition to the petitioner institute in accordance with law. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the application for grant of recognition to the petitioner institute, is still pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner had complied with all the formalities, as directed in para-4 of letter dated 23.07.2010, which is annexed as annexure no. 1 to the writ petition, the respondent No. 1 be directed to take final decision for grant of recognition for running B.Ed. course. The prayer made is innocuous. 2 The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent no. 1 to take final decision in the matter in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 8 weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of finally with the above direction. (Interim relief application No. 11052 of 2010, stands disposed of). (B.S.Verma, J.) 31-12-2010 S