w ”wok (9 WRIT PETITION (S No. 12009 ) $§§€£é£ WM IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W5 L/Veni Madhav Pandey S/O Hari Narayan Pandey, aged about 55 Years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary school Baiouda, (Middle Dept.) Block —— Balouda, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) . Puni Ram Patale S/O Annad Singh Patale aged about 53 Years Lecturer, rGovt. Higher Secondary school Balouda, Block — Balouda, Distt. Janjgir — Champa (C.G.) 3. Krishna Prasad Yadav S/O Jaganath Prasad Yadav aged about 56 Years, Head Master, Govt. Primary school Barbhata, Block — Balouda, Distt. Janjgir — Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1 State of Chhattlsgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya D K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C G) 2 The D1str1ct Educatlon Officer Distrlct Janjglr- Champa (C G ) 3. Block Educatlon Officer, Block — Balouda Distt. Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Principal Govt. Higher Secondary school Balouda, Distt. Janjgir — Champa (C.G.) PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS: ‘ @ % WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 6% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI-i : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 1S! No.6733 OF 2009 Veni Madhav Panc‘aey and Others Versus ESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Writ petition under Articles 226 of the Constitution of india) Sing!e Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri Ashwani Shukia, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. PETITIONER ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 18m day of November, 2009) Learned oounsei for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation before the respondent authorities for consideration in the tight of circular dated 13-01-2009 (Annexure P/2) issued by the Deputy Secretary, Department of School Education, State of Chhattisgarh. (2) No objection from the other side. (3) it is ordered, as prayed for. (4) Accordingly. the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advised. in the event, representation is made, the same may be considered objectively in accordance with law. M/ sd/-’ 2 Satish K. Agnihotri I Judge Tuma ne R ‘