CW 12420/10 (CRCF) //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench S.No. CWP/Stay Pet.Nos. / Name of Petitioners/ Versus 1. 12420/2010 (5414/10) Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors Versus State & Ors. 2. 12399/2010 (5389/10) Neeraj Rajawat & Ors Versus State & Ors. 3. 12447/2010 (5441/10) Ram Chandra Dahyal & Anr Versus State & Ors. 4. 12463/2010 (5457/10) Tara Chanker Sharma & Ors Versus State & Ors. 5. 12502/2010 (5495/10) Naveen Kr. Joshi & Ors Versus State & Ors. Date of Order ::: 03/12/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi For petitioners : Sarva Shri Dr. Ram Kr. Sharma, Sunil Samdaria, Ashish Saksena, and Anil Kr Sharma & Ram Pratap Saini. Mr. Rajneesh Gupta for Mr. SK Gupta, for respondents Department. Counsel jointly submit that the petitioners are Teacher Gr.III originally appointed in parent Education Department of State Government but upon deputation under the Rajasthan Council for Elementary Education were so designated as Cluster Resources Centre Facilitators (CRCF) to undertake the work of work of co-ordination of various schools in rural areas under the Panchayati Saities but their deputations was cancelled and they were repatriated as Teachers Gr.III to the parent department. It has not been disputed by both the Counsel that the controversy involved in the present petitions has been finally decided before the principal Seat at Jodhpur in CWP- 05137/2010 (Ananda Ram & Ors Vs. State & Ors) and cognate cases decided on 22/10/2010 with the observations ad infra:- CW 12420/10 (CRCF) //2// “11. This Court finds considerable force in the contention raised on behalf of the respondent -council as narrated above that in absence of any legal right with the petitioners to continue on the deputation and aving of huge amount of money which could be utilized in more appropriate manner to implement the “Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan” for the benefit of the students and to implement the provisions of Free and compulsory education Act, 2009 and Article 21A of the Constitution of India. This Court is unable to uphold the challenge of the petitioner to the cancellation of all deputations of Grade III Teachers as CRCF by the impugned order dtd.3.9.2010. For the same reasons and in the same spirit, this Court had already expressed this view while disposing of another writ petition on 6.10.2010 of one Shiv Shankar Shrimali (supra).” 12. Accordingly, these writ petitions are liable to be dismissed and the same are accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.”. Counsel for petitioners submit that interim orders were passed by this Court granting status quo as on 06/10/2010 and in view whereof, atleast during the period while order of status quo remained operative, neither respondent-2 Council nor their parent department has made payment of their salary which will create complication. This Court finds substance that the CW 12420/10 (CRCF) //3// period during which order of status quo remained operative has to be decided by the parent department. In light of the judgment in Ananda Ram & Ors Vs. State & Ors (supra), the writ petitions alongwith stay petitions, are accordingly dismissed. However, as regards the period during which orders of status quo having been passed in favour of petitioners remained operative, viz. From 06/10/2010 till date, petitioners may submit representation to the competent authority who may examine their grievance for non-payment of salary and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within one month from the receipt of certified copy of this orders. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi),J K.Khatri/p3/ 12420CW2010Dec3Dsp-CRCF(5).doc