IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1541 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1931 of 2009 With Interlocutory Application No. 7307 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1541 of 2011 ====================================================== Pranav Sheela Kumari, W/o Sri Anil Kumar Choudhary, R/O New Yarpur, Janta Road, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 3. The Project Director, Bihar State Aids Control Samiti, Health and Family Welfare Building, Sheikhpura, Patna 4. The Administrator/Controlling Officer, Counselling and Test Centre Kurji Holy Family Hospital, Patna .... .... Respondents/Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 04-11-2011 Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 4th August 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above CWJC No. 1931 of 2009, the writ petitioner has preferred the present Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The matter at issue is the transfer of the appellant from the post of Counsellor appointed under the Bihar State AIDS Patna High Court LPA No.1541 of 2011 (3) dt.04-11-2011 2 / 2 2 Control Samiti, Patna. The only challenge is that the appellant having been appointed on contract basis her service is not transferable. It appears that earlier also the appellant had been transferred from Munger to Patna and from Patna to Munger. It thus appears that though the service of the appellant may not be transferable, transfer of the Counsellors is being made routinely. Such action in the past was not challenged by the appellant apparently because the transfer was convenient. The appellant having accepted the transfer earlier cannot be permitted to challenge the order of transfer now on the ground that her service was not transferable. In absence of any other challenge to the transfer, the learned single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition. No case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Sujit/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)