IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No.600 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.7.2009 Vickey Dahiya -----Appellant Vs. M.D.University, Rohtak and another Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Nitesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant. Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment of learned Single Judge dated 27.5.2009, dismissing the writ petition, challenging cancellation of his admission and striking off his name from the College rolls. 2. The appellant took admission to BDS in the year 2005-06 and failed to pass examination of First Year within three years as required. He also did not attend the requisite number of lecturers. On that account, his name was struck off from the college rolls and his admission was cancelled in accordance with the rules and regulations applicable. LPA No.600 of 2009 (O&M) 3. The above action was challenged. Learned Single Judge held that there was no ground to interfere, as it was not disputed that the case of the appellant was covered by the provision of Clause 3.5 of the BDS Ordinance, providing for striking off name from college rolls for absence for more than 15 days at a stretch. Case of the appellant was also covered under Clause 3.1, which required attendance of 75% of lectures, which condition had not been fulfilled by the appellant. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 5. Only contention raised is that the appellant should have been given one more chance to take examination under the un-amended regulation. 6. It having not been disputed that the appellant was not eligible having not attended the requisite number of lectures and having not passed the examination of First Year within three years, there is no ground for interference with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. 7. The appeal is dismissed. (Adarsh Kumar Goel) Judge July 15, 2009 (Daya Chaudhary) ‘gs’ Judge 2