IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.NO.1069 OF 2007 13-12-2010 Between:- Marasa Raghupathi Devi .. Petitioner And Koduri Venkatappaiah ..Respondent ORDER:- No representation for the revision petitioner. Petition is filed as against the order dated 12-04-2006 in C.F.R.No.1876 of 2006 in C.M.A.No. of 2006 of the District Judge, Guntur in rejecting the presentation of the appeal. It appears that the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli in C.F.R.No.6754 of 2004 dated 17-10-2005 is said to have rejected a plaint on the ground of limitation under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. As against that order, originally, a revision was filed before the High Court and the said revision was returned with some objections. Thereafter, realizing that an appeal lies against the order of rejection under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C., concerned papers were presented before the District Judge, Guntur and the learned District Judge, taking note of the order of the Hon’ble High Court in C.R.P(SR)No.6816 of 2006, directed that all the formalities of objections raised by the High Court shall be complied with and on such compliance, the direction shall be given by the High Court for the appellant to file the same before the District Court and without doing that, the appeal cannot be presented to the District Court. The point for consideration is: “Whether the order of the learned District Judge is valid?” Evidently, as against the order of rejection of a plaint, an appeal lies to the District Court depending on the valuation since there is no Court of Senior Civil Judge at Satenapalli. When the jurisdiction is conferred on the District Court when an objection is raised by the High Court about its maintainability, there is no point in directing the party to get a rejection from the High Court and then approach the District Court for numbering the same. If the parties become wise in knowing where the matter should be proceeded with, the Court cannot ask them to again go to other Court and get a rejection order. Therefore, when revision petitioner has found that a valid cause can be agitated before the District Court by way of appeal, which is provided under the statute, it is erroneous on the part of the District Judge to have rejected the C.F.R. Therefore, the learned District Judge is directed to number the appeal and proceed further. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO ,J 13th December 2010 AMD