SiNGLE BENCH c^ /<9-ZQ, IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTCON (S) N0...^.0.^./2010 permoNER RESPONDENTS ^...-•^"o... ^^e^' 6VX^W oK-ay- •••'\".- .-•r .- (^- -^ ..-•' ^^- .•1)1)R(I"KEI3!-E Vikas Singh Banoudhe, Son of Late Bheshmani Singh, aged about 30 years, working as Grade-III, Govl High School, Potgaon, District Kankrr R/o. Village and post Kodabhoy District Kanker (C.6.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Principal Secretary, Departmenl of General Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantrataya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.). 3. District EduGation Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) The Collector, Kanker, Distnct - Kanker(C.6.) Chief Executive Qfficer; Janpad Panchayat, Kanker,t)istrict - Kanker (C.G.), ^^^^sS^i&8&^S^&^^sS£Ss:^s^E^ • WRITPETTJTQN UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CQUNSTtTUTEON OF INDIA. The petitioner above-named most respectfully submit as under: 'XfflC—78 sn^iqiift-TO; vn sn^v aiiiti ^ HWWI a»w^ 3rcT ^i<(id^, ®fl1<-i*is,fa<ni'M>|,< ^.....^.£^..^.-.k^^ 3T^?ITPRi' (li<:<(^»<<'EI) ^aiw^feisn^i SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra M 18.8.2010 copy. Mr. R. S. Patel, counsel Mrs. Sangeeta Mishra, Heard on admission. The pedtioner has filed ward of Assistant Teacher, wl application for compassionate eti1^I'<if'Eft'1 'RW^f ^f t^t <f«i'^R ^siRnsiitn ahan Shriwistava, J. for the petitioner. ^anel Lawyer for the State, on advance this petition on the ground that he is ^o died while in service. He moved an appointajient and he has been given appointanent on the post of S|hiksha Karini Grade III. The petitioner submitted fhat he is entitled according to the policy. Learned State counsel petitioner inay be given ai| representation before the comi| be considered on its own meritd Having considered and ^ merits of the case, in the opin^on served, if a direction is giver) represehtation raising his authority along with a copy ol\ weeks from today, and on competent respondent author( to be appointed as Assistant Teacher submitted that for the present, the opportunity of filing the detailed etent respondent authority, which inay , in accordance with law. |vithout expressing any opinion on the of this Court, ends ofjustice will be to the petitioner to make a detailed before the competent respondent the petition and this order, within SK isuch representation being filed, the !ty shall decide the ,same on its own grie^ances Bi! 5^ XI-HC—78 's^ •<<|i|i<n<i, ®til'H'i<o,fsjdl'M^ *ii*iwi a>*<rai Wl 200 an^T'Tsra' (lic<I^«<<itT) 3TI^I W li!-fi=h TOTSIT^IWffi •1*^:- fe Praveen wiiwdftn sn^w L- merits, in accordance with law M tpelloduai6feiiKyBionths from thi ^^ •0^.^;fe:^yi.^,-^^^5 ss ,—11 '' . gTexance *;stiU remains, -.-~'-'-...c&Wff»:»«''"""' |as early as possible, prefefably within a date of receipt of the representation. If |the petitioner may avail the remedy '*f''-S' trlBibleiMHFdWthe law. With the aforesaid observ^tion, this petition stands disposed off. Certified copy as perrulej Sd-/ ManindraMohanShrivastava ~- -^ , JudgP qif<i[(n<ili 'HW^ff "^f 'fet^ ^foR^R ^3?RlH31I^?I