Thakur 1^ tl3efifiicMfsi11.I^835of2007 Pefit'ioner Respondents Versus T. Umarani.wiTeofVishwanathGoaldhar.aged about30years, Gasupation—'Sah Sahayeka" Anganbadi, Nutrttton and Food Distribution Center - Loharpard, R/o Loharpara Jawahar Nagar, Tahsil Paal DistrictSarguja{C^3J 2. 3. 4. SteteofChhattisgarh,ttirough:the Secr8tary,Departrn6ntpfWomenandChild Devetopment, D.K.S, Bhavran, mantrataya, Raipur^.G.). The Disb-ictCollector.Sarguja (C.G.) Di^rictProgrammeofficer.Womenand ChiidWeffiareDi^ri<ASarguja<C.G.) RQopManjari.wifeQfShanlsaarVl^lwas, aged about20, R/o JawaharNagar. Tahsi! Paat, DistnctSapguja (C.Q.) SB: Hon'ble li/lr. Justice SatishK. Agnihotri, J Shri Bhaskar Pyasj, Advocate twthe petifioner. MissSunitaJain.PahdelLawyerfortteTespondentsNo. 1 to3. QRDER (Passed onthis 13*dayof March, 2007) By this petition, the petitioner chalfenges the validity of the order dated 11.1.2<X)7 ^nnexure P/1), whereby ttie respondent No.4 has been appointed on ttie post ^Aanganwadi WorkeratAnganbactj Genter Loharpara, District - Surguja, on the groynd thgt the appointment of the respondent No.4 is contrary to the order dated 10.4.20C®CAnnexur®P/4). Leamed counsel for fte petjtioner submte that the petitioner has preferential right to the selection and appointmsnt as Anganbadi Worker in Anganbadi Centre Loharpara. In view ofthe above. without expressing any opinion on facts as well as on ment,tteColtector,Surgutaisdireotedtolookintotheal!egationmadebythe petitioner and pass appropriate order. in accordance with Aanganwadi Scheme and law. Thewritpetitionisaccordinglydisposedof.Nporderastocoste. ConsequenUy,M(VV)P No. 503/2007 stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrt Judge