IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11502 of 2011 EJAJ KHAN @ EJAJ AKHTAR @ MD. EJAJ KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, the present case was lodged on 28.01.2011 and the petitioner was arrested on 30-1- 2011. Furthermore, it is an admitted position that the impugned order passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea on 17.03.2011, but he has not even whispered about the materials which are said to have come against the petitioner in course of investigation, rather he has rejected the bail petition of the petitioner only considering the allegation levelled against him. In course of hearing learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the confessional statement of one co-accused, namely, Rudra Nand Jha, who was working as Manager of Dehti PACS at the relevant time, was recorded but he did not name the petitioner in his confessional statement and subsequently when his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded, he disclosed the name of the petitioner. It is further contended by him that not a single chit of paper is 2 available on case diary to show that petitioner had received any amount from the above stated PACS. It is further pointed out by him that some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ejaj Khan @ Ejaj Akhtar @ Md. Ejaj Khan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No.17 of 2011. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)