^^Ah.*. i.-i_^V c F /.y%>^- IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR_(CG) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. f 38 /200§"7~- WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER € ^ ..••''"^•••" '' Dilip Singh Sidar,- aged about 44 years, .,,-''<<vu'"" ..-•''' son of Shri Khageshwar Sidar, . . . „ , '"' /^ ^\Y,--;'\!-^gb..--"" Assistant Teacher, Govemment '/•^M'^ Primary School Sanda, Raigarh (C.G.) ,-:"^^;''"' (SL.N0.39 of Annexure P- 1) ??>" ,.-" VERSUS ^ RESTONDENTS ^ ^sp"^^£ ^s^^ " (, 2. yA.; ^ w State ofChhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer - Raigarh (CG) 01. PARTICULARSABQUTJ^EPETmQNER ^ HKH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BlLASPUft W. P.(S) No. 123 of 2007 Ptetitioner ; Jagortpal Nikunj Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh <& another i W P.tS) No. 124 of 2007 Petitioner : Venudhar Ijardar i Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt'iS9arh A ano-ther Petitioner W.P.(S)No. 125of 2007 Ku. Jeevan Manju Xalxo (after marrkgeSmt. Jeevan Manju Viswas) Verais Respondents : Stateof Chhat^isgarh Aothers W P.(S) No. 132 of 2007 Petitioner : Clament Kerketta Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh <& another 1: : . • W. P.fSlNo. 138 of 2007 [' 1 . . Petitioner : Oilip Singh Sidor [ 1 Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgou'h A another W. P.fSlNo 143 of 2007 Petitwner : Trilochan Nayak 1 Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A another W. P.fSlNo 144 of 2007 Petitioner : Kailashpati Nayak Versus Re^iondents : State ofChhattiS9arh & another W. P.(S) No. 146 of 2007 Peti1|ioner : Roop Narayan Ram i ' Versus Resppridents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh A another 1 3f\ A W. P.(S) No. 148 of 2007 Petitioner ; Rc^jkumar Patel Versus Re|spondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh (Sano-ther W. P.fSl No 152 <rf 2007 Peti1;ioner ; Shyam Mohan Nayak Versus fteaipondents : State of Chhattisgwh &another I : : And ' W. P.(S)No. l«)of 2007 Petitioner : Narendra Singh Nayak j Versus Reqiondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh & ano-ther l' I- SB: Hon'ble Mr.Justice SatishK. Agnihotri. J Present: Shi^i A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for Ihe petitioners(s). l' 1 ••- .' . ..' •• ' ..' ; • • • . • Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovernment Adwcate, fAr. Arvind Dutaey, Ponel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Pcaiel Lawyer for the re^)ondents/S*ate. O R D ER i (Pttssed on -this 17th Day of January, 2007) The fotlowin9 order of -the Court is passed by Satish IC. Agnihotri. J. \3 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/re^>ondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are simitar to that of in W.P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (RukeA Kumar Sharma & another vs. State of ChhaM'isgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further submit that •rtie questipn of law involved is also the same. I;,. Subhiuh 2. In view of the above-stated submissipns made by leamed counsel for the partie^ •these wit petitions are disposed of in terms of the order 1 i ' ! • • ' ' • '• dated 9.10.2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Ratedi Kumar Sbariffia d another vs. State of Chhattisgarh d o'thers). No order as to costs. 1 \ . • - 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected inatters. . Sd/- Satish K-Agnihotri Judge