IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 19068 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ CHANDRIKA T.S, AGED 62 YEARS, W/O.MADAKKAVIL ASHOKAN, P.O.INCHAMUDI, INCHAMUDI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680564 BY ADV. SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER , THANNIYAM VILLAGE, INCHAMUDI,THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN-680564 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 3. THE TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN-680001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 19068 of 2011(G) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX ---------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- EXT.P1. COPY OF THE WILL NO.23/97 DATED 31.01.1997 EXECUTED BY LATE KUTTIMALU. EXT.COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.04.1996 IN A.S. NO.117/1990. EXT.P3. COPY of the JUDGMENT DATED 04.12.2003 IN S.A NO.996/1996 ET.P4. COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM CHAZHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23.09.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 08.1.2011 ISSUED T0 THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL -------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19068 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, she inherited an immovable property as per Ext.P1 Will executed by her mother-in-law. Seeking transfer of registration in her name and also acceptance of tax on that basis, she made Ext.P5 application to the first respondent. Although the application was made as early as on 23.9.2009, orders have not been passed so far. That made the petitioner to cause a lawyer notice issued, a copy of which is Ext.P6. Even Ext.P6 did not evoke any response. It is therefore stage this writ petition has been filed. 2. Having regard to the nature of the aforesaid grievance, at this stage what is required is to direct the first respondent to take action on Ext.P5 in terms of the provisions contained in Transfer of Registry Rules. This W.P.(C) No. 19068 OF 2011 :2 : shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-