SAO 9/2014 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N. CHAUDHURY As against the same judgment impugned in this appeal, another SAO being SAO No. 7 of 2014 was preferred by the proforma respondent Fatema Begum @ Fatema Khatun. Earlier this Court directed that SAO No. 7 of 2014 to be numbered as Second App eal and thereafter to list the same for hearing under Order XLI Rule 11 of the C ode of Civil Procedure. This appeal also arises out of the same judgment out of which SAO No.7 of 2014 was preferred. Let this appeal also be numbered as RSA and let it be listed for hearing under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil procedure along with aforesaid app eal.