IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25050 of 2010 JAI JAI RAM SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06.8.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with G.R.P. Jhajha P.S.Case No.52 of 2009 for the offence punishable under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The involvement of the petitioner is by reason of recovery of mobile phone which is among the items which was stolen from the informant and his family members as set out in the first information report. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to the allegation set out in the first information report, submits that neither there is any description of make of mobile phone nor IMEI number has been given by the informant and in the absence whereof, the involvement of the petitioner by reason of possessing a mobile phone is wholly unjustified. He further submits that even the sim card does not tally with the mobile phone stolen from the informant. It is submitted that in such 2 circumstances, the petitioner having clean antecedent has remained in custody since 27.4.2010. Taking into Consideration the circumstances and submissions of the learned counsel, let the petitioner Jai Jai Ram Sharma be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul in connection Jhajha Rail P.S.Case No.52 of 2009. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)