IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1085 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1129/2008 Dated 06/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT: --------------------------------------------------------- REV.FR.PAULOSE THOMAS, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING TRUSTEE, PADINJARECHALIL CHARITABLE SOCIETY, (PARUMALA MAR GREGORIOUS B.ED. TRAINING COLLEGE, NELLIMATTOM P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 693. BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WRIT APPEAL: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION (APPELLATE AUTHORITY), HANS BHAVAN, WING-II, 1, BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI - 110002. 2. THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE, IST FLOOR, CSD BUILDINGs, HMT POST, BANGALORE - 560031. ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss J.B. Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. -------------------------------------- R.P. No. 1085 of 2008 in W.A.No.1129 of 2008 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2008 Order Koshy,J. In the judgment under review, we have directed to consider the question of granting recognition considering the 2002 norms and regulations. What is to be enquired is regarding satisfying the conditions as per the 2002 regulations and inspection should not be done on the basis of the present conditions. The judgment is pronounced on 6.6.2008. It is for the respondent to pass appropriate orders at least within three months from today. Any queries asked should be answered by the petitioner. Before conducting another inspection, the authority should consider whether 2002 norms and regulations were complied with as per the earlier inspection notes. Only if it is not complied with, a second inspection is necessary. We see no ground to review the judgment. The review petition is disposed of accordingly. J.B.Koshy Judge P.N.Ravindran Judge vaa R.P.No.1085/2008 in W.A.No.1129/2008 2 J.B. KOSHY AND P.N.RAVINDRAN,JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P. No.1085/2008 in W.A.No.1129/2008 ------------------------------------- Order Date:29th October,2008