IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2011 / 31ST ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2272 of 2011() ----------------------------------- OP.653/1998 & OP. 785/1998 of THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. MC.133/2011 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, KODUNGALLUR .................... PETITIONER(S): IST ACCUSED -------------------------------------- THARAPRASAD, S/O.SUDHARMAN, KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KAIPAMANGALAM P.O., IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE --------------------------------------------------------- 1. VIJI, D/O.KAITHAVALAPPIL BASKARAN, ERIYAD VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 680 664. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.N.JAYASURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss CRMC. 2272/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES A1:- COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER MADE IN OP.653/1998 AND OP.785/1998 DTD. 19.10.2004 BY THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. AII:- COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET MADE IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME 328/2003 OF MATHILAKOM POLICE STATION FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGITRATE COURT, KODUNGALLUR AS CC.91/2004. AIII:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CC. 91/2004 DTD. 31.5.2008 BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGITRATE COURT, KODUNGALLUR. AIV:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGITRATE COURT, KODUNGALLUR AS MC. 133/2011 WITH TRANSLATION. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TSS JUDGE tss B.P.RAY, J. Crl.M.C.NO.2272 of 2011 Dated this the 22nd day of July 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the respondent in M.C.No.133/2011 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur for the offence punishable under Sections 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The prayer of the petitioner is to quash M.C.No.133/2011 filed against him. 3. I am not inclined to interfere at this stage. It is for the petitioner to file show cause and if any adverse order is passed, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the same. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application. 4. This Crl.M.C is dismissed as not pressed. (sd/-) (B.P.RAY, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge CRL.M.C.No. 2 CRL.M.C.No. 3 CRL.M.C.No. 4 CRL.M.C.No. 5