HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2968 OF 2002 ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as a Part-time Lecturer in Mathematics in the year 1992 in the M.R.College, Vizianagaram, a private aided educational institution, 3rd respondent herein. A notification was issued by the 3rd respondent on 16-06-1995, proposing to fill various posts, including two posts of Lecturers in Mathematics and Statistics, which are not admitted to grant-in-aid. Petitioner states that he was one of the candidates selected by the Selection Committee. His grievance is that the proposals, sent by the 3rd respondent, are not being approved by the Commissioner and Director of College Education, the 2nd respondent herein. 2. While admitting the writ petition, this Court passed an interim order on 13-10-2004, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner. In compliance with the said direction, the 2nd respondent passed an order, dated 25-01-2004. It was mentioned that against two notified posts of Lecture in Mathematics and Statistics, V. Srinivasa Murthy and P. Konda Babu were selected and the petitioner was not selected at all. Stating this and some other reasons, the 2nd respondent rejected the case of the petitioner. An application is filed with a prayer to amend the writ petition, proposing to challenge the proceedings, dated 25-01-2004, also. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 4. The petitioner asserts that he has been selected against an unaided vacancy, notified on 16-06-1995. The 2nd respondent has a different version. According to him, the petitioner was not selected at all. This Court cannot examine such disputed questions of fact. Further, the Government has been passing orders, year after year, in relation to imposition of ban of appointment or absorption of incumbents against the aided vacancies in private educational institutions. If there does not exist any impediment now, and if there are any vacant aided posts, the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent can renew their efforts. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent to approach the 2nd respondent for absorption, in case, there exists any such facility. As and when such application is made, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J December 29, 2010. KTL