@ CD C£ /2*;—>7/\ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S) No. (4327/ /2009 (s.B.) PETITIONER Bishali Ram Dhruw, S/o Shri Itvvari Ram Dhruw, aged about 43 years, Occupation Upper Division Teacher, Block Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS :/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (cc) 3. Block Education Officer Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (co) WIT R PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WW? @ WWW‘ am aTréyl Wm Wmam WW wW $31'Wnanén S.B: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITINKER DIWAKER 28-08-2009: Mr. Somkant Verma counc el for the petitioner. Ms.Sunita Jain, Panel Law‘jier for the State. Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to me representatiow before the respondent No. 1 as according to him, case of the petitioner is identicai to the number of 1 to the authority concerned which dance with law. dismissed as Withdrawn with liberty if filed by the petitioner within a petitioner make a representatio wouid be decided strictly in accor Accordingly, the petition is as aforesaid. The representati period of one month from the da e of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected to be'decid d by authority concerned within a further period of four months fro the date of its reoei t. weiLii*"/‘/ Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker Judge Wm.PL mam—am (We) cases decided by this court and he copy of two such orders i.e. dated 3m April, 2006 passed in W.P. N 13977/2003 and dated 6th February, 2009 passed in W.P. (S) No. 367/2009, have been filed by the petitioner. ICounselfor the submits that at this stage he is not in a posmon to make any statement as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered by the order passed in the aforementioned identibal writ petitions or not. He however submits that let the