GURT GF CHEATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 7672 ef200’7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF }NDIA ”v SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agm'hotri. J. ?resent: Shri Sanjay hm, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Aj ay Dwivedi, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORAL GRDER (Passed on 08‘5 aay of February, 2008) The petitioner was appointed in the year 1995 on probation for a period of two years as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 12GO/—. After completion of his probation: he was granted regular pay scaie. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the ease is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or atter completion of probation period. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ear Prasad Erma and others vs. State of Chhattisgark amt others (Writ Petition (S.) No.519l of2006), éated 310.2006. .. . EIGH C 1’ETITIGNER : Szmjay Tager, Sfo R.S.Tager, Aged about 34 years, R/o Bharti Nagar, Near Railway Line, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Thraugh A The Secretary, . Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur — (C.G.) 2. Director: Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur - (C.G.) 3. Disirict Education Officer, DiStt. Bilaspur — (C.G.) Amit IQ 4. For the aforementioned magmas, the writ petition is disposed 0f in tenns of ihe decision of this Court in the matter of Har Pmsmi Kurre and aihers vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others (Supra). The petitioner is allowed to make a representation Within a period of two weeks from today to respondent No.1, raising all his grievances and, in turn, respondent No.1 shaii decide the said representation in an objective manner Within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such representation, after considering all the points raised by the petitioners and taking into account the order dated 3 1-1-2000 passed by the iearned State Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.1452 of 1998, and ifthe petitioners stand on the same footings, as the petitioners in the Original Application No. 1452 of 1998, then they he also sanctioned the same pay-scale and seniority. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid direction, subject to verification cfthe facts. No order as to costs. Sdl- Satis‘n K. Agnihotri Judge