IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1190 of 2009 Date of Decision:07.07.2009 Kuldeep Singh Duggal ....petitioner Versus Anurag Rastogi & anr. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.H.N.Khanduja,Advocate for the petitioner **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. The grouse of the petitioner in this case is that despite the directions given vide order dated 19.09.2003 passed in CWP No.14917 of 2003, to treat the writ petition as a representation on his behalf and pass a speaking order on the same within a period of four months, till date, no such order has been passed by the respondents. However, from the perusal of the record, I find no averment made by the petitioner to the effect that copy of the writ petition was ever sent by him to the respondents. Even from the alleged representations attached by him along with the contempt petition, it is not made out that at any stage, petitioner submitted copy of the writ petition to the respondents. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to file a fresh contempt petition with better particulars. With aforesaid liberty, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 07.07.2009 neenu