^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATLBILASPUR rmffle Bend? Contemot Case fCI N0. ^74 /201J. PETITIQNERS ^v^vl.<^. ^^y^" ,'5"^"' ...""" AO'-""'_A'^" ^••'"' .-<~ ^ie"' ./•"'"^ / -<fc- 's^..-"^ o' 1. Narayan Shukla Aged about .43 Years, S/o P.N. Shuka Address- New Sarkanda Jabadapara,District- Bilaspur(C.G.) •«. 2. Arun Pratap Singh Aged about 44 Years, S/o Shri Talukdar Singh, R/o Gram Pura, Post- Dhatwa, District- Pratapgarh(U.P-) 3. Dukhuram Baiswada Aged about 40 Years S/o Shri Radheshyam Baiswak, R/o Bangali Para,- Gali No.3 District- Bilaspur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT: (CONTEMNOR) A.N. Mishra Managing Director S/o- not known to the petitioners Aged about 58 years Chhattisgarh Rajya Avam Krishi Vikas Nigam Ltd, Raipur PETITION UNDER SECTIONV'12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACTL ^READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE COriSTITUITON OF INDIA The petitioners most humbly beg to s.u.bmit as under:- 4U- aEE-ii 3"^ •<)i<ii<vi<i, ®-!i1y^<s,•f^irey: .<:S^.:.Qs&Qlr!v..?^ll. SII^iqiTfelW sn^r'amN? 'Raiw^fig sii^i qwfefrl •WICT 4 ft^t ^R^R ^sifgHSfi^t Tumane SB : Hon'ble Shri IVIanindralVloh 26-08-2011 Shri Mateen Siddiqui, counss Heard. This petition has been fil disobedience of order dated 25-08- 2002, whereby the petition was make representation to respondent|No Learned counsel for the pet petitioners to withdraw the petition Court expected that the matter w| respondent has not cared to take a|iy date, which amounts to willful disobji It is unfortunate that the ho[ Court for deciding the matter expei| respondent. This Court expressed expeditiously, ever since then, the two years. However, in the absenc^ contempt proceedings cannot be d| to pray for a specific direction fr(|im cases. With the aforesaid observati h Shrivastava. J. 1 for the petitioners. l^d by the petitioners alleging willful •?009 passed in Writ Petition No. 1935 of |ismissed as withdrawn with liberty to >.6 therein. jtioners submits that while allowing the ^n/ith liberty to make representation, this >uld be decided expeditiously, but the |iy decision whatsoever in the matter till idience of the order of the Court. jes, which have been expressed by the iitiously, have turned on deaf ear of the |hope that the matter would be decided natter has remained pending for almost of any specific direction by this Court, •awn. The petitioners would be at liberty the Court for consideration of their n, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ wi«'C\tlSSvyVlk/W, U»l-li.i'IW—FS/140 —2/2011—1,50,000. "' ^