IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.276 of 2011 MALA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02. 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is for quashing the Sessions Trial No. 17 of 2006 arising out of C. R. No. 1127 of 2002 pending in the court of Fast Track Court – I, Darbhanga, on the ground that the trial court has no territorial jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the State submits that after closing the evidence, case is pending for argument and as such, filing the present writ application on behalf of the petitioner is merely to delay the proceedings. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, in my opinion, the prayer of the petitioner for quashing the entire criminal trial is not justified in law. However, if so advised, it will be open for the petitioner to raise all his rights and contentions available to him under the law in the facts and circumstances of the case in the court below, if the case is pending for argument informed by the respondent no. 2, the informant of the case. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)