1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1362 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1362 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1362 OF 2006 Chandrabose Ramlal Desai & ors... Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & ors.. Respondents Mr.Aniket Vagal i.b Ms A.Patil, Advocate for Petitioners Ms.S.D.Shinde,A.P.P.for respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND J.N.PATEL AND SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DALVI, JJ DATED DATED DATED : : : 18th September, 2006 18th September, 2006 18th September, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. This is an application by the accused person for transferring their case pending all over the State of Maharashtra to Thane District Court or to 2 any other Court. It is the case of the petitioners that in all 18 cases are registered against the petitioners and others and which are investigated by State C.I.D. Out of 18 cases, charge sheets are filed in 14 cases in different Courts all over the State of Maharashtra and cases are also registesred against them in different police stations, investigation of which is not handed over to the State C.I.D. A chart of the cases which are entrusted to State C.I.D. are given in the affidavit in reply filed by the respondents. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find that this is a fit case where all the cases should be transferred to one Court as the respondents are right in stating that it will rather cause inconvenience to the complainant who are victims and witnesses. Therefore, we do not find any merit in the petition. 3. Petition is dismissed. (Smt (Smt (Smt Roshan Dalvi,J) Roshan Dalvi,J) Roshan Dalvi,J) (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, (J.N.Patel, J) J) J)