IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32638 of 2007 1. SRI RAM RAI. 2. MADHAV RAI. BOTH SONS OF CHANDI RAI. 3. BHUSHAN RAI. 4. SATYENDRA RAI. 5. MUKESH RAI. ALL SONS OF SRI RAM RAI. 6. TUNNA RAI, S/O MADHAV RAI. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-BAITAPUR, P.S. SHIKARPUR, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN………………………PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. RAJENDRA RAI, SON OF LATE HIRA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SHEIKH DHURWA, P.S. MANUAPUL, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN. ……………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the Petitioners : M/s. U.C. Verma, and Sri Manoj Kumar Advocates. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhayay, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No.1, Advocate. --------- 3. 10.11.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The submissions advanced by the learned counsel for he petitioners though alluring in nature unfortunately happen to be their defence which cannot be looked into in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The petitioners may raise all these issues at the time of framing of charge. With the aforesaid observations, this application is dismisses as withdrawn, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioners. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)