IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2885 of 1998 Between: G.Janaki Rami Reddy, S/o. Venkataramireddy, R/o. Iravendi Village, Burgampadu Mandalam, Khammam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Khammam Dist. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Burgampadu Police Station, Khammam Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate order or direction or a writ more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein not to interfere with the petitioner liberty and property in connection with Crime No.97/97 of Burgampadu Police Station pending investigation and trial of the case which was registered under section 302,324R/W Sec.34 of I.P.C. against the accused 1 to 3 by not insisting the petitioner to produce Accused No.3 before the 2nd respondent herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.S.BHASKARA RAO (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents not to interfere with his liberty and property in connection with Crime No.97 of 1997 of Burgampadu Police Station pending investigation and trial of the case which was registered under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code against accused Nos.1 to 3 therein, and not to insist the petitioner to produce accused No.3 in the case before the second respondent. When the matter came up today for hearing, none appears for the petitioner. This Court while admitting the writ petition by order dated 20-02-1998, granted interim direction to the respondents not to insist the petitioner to produce accused No.3 in Crime No.97 of 1997 of Burgampadu Police Station. The learned Government Pleader for Home submitted that in view of the interim orders, nothing survives in the writ petition and the same has become infructuous. Recording the above submission of the learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 04-03-2005 Svv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Khammam Dist. 2 The Sub Inspector of Police, Burgampadu Police Station, Khammam Dist. 3 Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 Two CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ANURADHA}