WP(C) 5988/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA.. Heard Mr. B. Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.D. Konw ar, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.6. I have also heard Ms R. C hakraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 21.10.2010 (Annexure-I to the writ petition), by which the earlier order dated 1.10.2010 has been stayed unti l further order. The order has been issued by the Addl. Registrar of Co-operativ e Societies (Admn), Assam with the approval of the Registrar of Co-operative Soc ieties, Assam. The earlier order dated 1.10.2010 was also issued by the said Add l. Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Admn), Assam. By the said earlier order , it was provided that the earlier order dated 11.7.2007 would continue. The or der dated 11.7.2007 was issued by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assam engaging the petitioner as in-charge Secretary of Jagibhakatgaon Samabay Samity Limited as per the resolution (Resolution No.3) of the Managing Committee adopt ed in its meeting held on 16.5.2007. According to the petitioner, the impugned order dated 21.10.2010 (Annexu re-I to the writ petition) has been issued at the behest of the local M.L.A. and not in any valid consideration. In the counter affidavit filed by the Addl. Registrar of Co-operative So cieties (Admn), Assam, it has been admitted that on receipt of a complaint petit ion submitted by the petitioner, an enquiry was conducted by the Sub-Registrar o f Co-operative Societies (Audit) and in the said enquiry, the Chairman was found to be guilty and accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to him. It has als o been admitted that the petitioner was removed from the Secretary-ship on recei pt of resolution from the Chairman of the Society and one Junior Inspector-cum-A uditor of the Co-operative Societies. In paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit, i t has been stated that the resolution adopted towards removal of the petitioner as Secretary was not approved by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societi es. In paragraph 10 of the counter affidavit, it has stated that the impugned or der was issued staying the earlier order on the request of the local M.L.A. and Parliamentary Secretary, Public Works Department. Thus, if we go by the stand of the respondents in their affidavit, what we find is that the impugned Annexure-I order dated 21.10.2010 was not issued in any valid consideration, but was so issued at the behest of the local M.L.A. an d Parliamentary Secretary. The official respondents instead of taking action as per law, were guided by the dictation of the political bosses. In Misc. Case No.3757/2010 filed by the petitioner, a prayer has been ma de for a direction the Respondents No.1 and 2, more particularly, the Respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the appeal dated 16.11.2010 (Annexure-A). Anne xure-A is the appeal/representation dated 16.11.2010 addressed to the Government of Assam in the Co-operation Department and the Registrar of Co-operative Socie ties, Assam. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of directing th e Respondent No.2 i.e. the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assam to take on record the said representation dated 16.11.2010 and dispose of the same taking into account the aforesaid observations and the stand in the counter affidavit a nd also the enquiry report submitted against the Chairman. Let the appropriate order be passed as expeditiously as possible, but at any rate, not later than 07th February,2011.