THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.23212 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 Petitioner claims to be the owner of an extent of Ac.1.20 guntas in Sy.No.244 of Mamidipalli village. Because of the civil disputes between him and the respondents 5 and 6, the respondents 5 and 6 filed O.S.No.2841 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. However, the said court refused to grant any interim injunction, but, the said suit is pending. As they were unsuccessful before the trial court, it appears, the respondents 5 and 6 approached the fourth respondent and without any right whatsoever the fourth respondent directed the petitioner to appear before him on 26.04.2009. Accordingly the petitioner appeared before the fourth respondent and informed him that he is the absolute owner of the land and also informed him about the pendency of the civil suit. Thereafter, as the respondents 5 and 6 and others demolished the compound wall existing in his land, the petitioner gave a compliant on the basis of which the fourth respondent registered a case in Cr.No.193 of 2009 against the respondents 5 and 6 for the offence punishable under sections 447, 427 and 324 r/w 34 of IPC. Despite the registration of the said crime, the fourth respondent is not investigating into the matter and again he started acting at the behest of the respondents 5 and 6 and put the petitioner into cell without any justification and he further threatened the petitioner that he shall not enter into the land in dispute. Questioning the said action of the fourth respondent the petitioner approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition. 2 Heard Mr. C.S.N. Raju for respondents 5 and 6. 3 On instructions the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 5 and 6 and in that connection both parties have approached the fourth respondent and made complaints against each other, on the basis of which, two crimes were registered i.e. Cr.No.189 of 2009 against the petitioner and Cr.No.193 of 2009 against the respondents 5 and 6. It is further stated that during the course of investigation the fourth respondent directed the petitioner to appear before the Police Station and excepting that he never high handedly behaved or interfered with the personal liberty of the petitioner. 4 The said instructions submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader are recorded and in the light of the said instructions, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the fourth respondent not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process under law. No order as to costs. ------------------------ 10.11.2009 kvsn