1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Civil Application No.4258 of 2007. In Writ Petition No.2286 of 2003. [Shri Nilkanth S/o Gulabrao Nithul and one] Vs. [State of Maharashtra and others] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri AD Mohogaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Deopujari AGP for R-1. Shri Gordey, Advocate for R2 & 3. Shri Sambre Advocate for R-4. Shri Sudame Advocate for R-5. Coram: D.D. SINHA AND SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK,JJ. Dated : 11th FEBRUARY 2008. 1. Heard learned Counsel for then petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Civil application No.4258 of 2007 is moved by the respondent no.4 seeking permission to amend the 2 return. 3. The request is not objected by the Counsel for the other respondents. 4. In that view of the matter, Civil Application is allowed. 5. The appropriate amendment in return should be carried out within one week. Needless to mention that other respondents as well as the petitioner are entitled to carry out subsequent amendment, if any, in their respective pleadings. 6. Place the matter after one week. JUDGE JUDGE Sbm