1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44508 of 2010 Rajiv Ranjan Singh @Bablu, S/o Mohan Singh, Village Jamuara, P.S. Tekari, District-Gaya. --Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Kumari Sobha W/o Rajeev Ranjan Singh, D/o Krishna Singh, R/o Village-Pirachak, P.S. Paraya, District-Gaya. --Opp.Party 6 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this complaint case, being husband of complainant opposite party no.2, who is not physically present today inspite of earlier order dated 13.10.2011. Further submission is that in view of good sense prevailed between the parties the couple is residing with each other at place of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, in the event of petitioner appearing before the court below or arrest on or before 09th January, 2012 with a petition of compromise stating all such facts and residing together, the petitioner, is directed to be enlarged on 2 bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Complaint Case no. 1078 of 2008; Tr. No. 762 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition of such filing of compromise petition the court shall permit the couple to go and continue to reside with each other at their place of choice and to report personally on the dates fixed till the court is satisfied of their conduct and able to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. The petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)