... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4153 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4153 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4153 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2309 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2309 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL NO.2309 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Ghansham Mishra for the Applicant. Shri Pande i/by Shri Ashok Mishra and Arvind Mishra for the Respondent No.3. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant. During the pendency of the suit, there was no interim relief granted in favour of the Applicant. After dismissal of the suit on merits, the Applicant is not entitled to any interim relief. Hence, Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE