IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 6032 of 2009 Between: V.Madan Mohan S/o.Late Munaswamy Naidu Sri Vidyodaya Educational Society, R/o.D.No.232, Brundavan Road,Salivahana Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Regional PRovident Fund Commissioner, EPF Organization, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Barkatpura, Hyderabad 2 Smt.Brunda Devi @ Brunda Prasad W/o.C.S.Prasad Tirupathi, R/o.D.No.232, Brundavan Road, Salivahana Nagar Tirupathi Town, Chittoor District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1 in not passing any order on the representation dated 17.2.2009 of the petitioner made complaining against the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.R.N.REDDY (SC FOR EMPLOY'S PF ORG.) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.6032 of 2009 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner is that he submitted a representation, dated 17.02.2009, to the 1st respondent-Regional P.F.Commissioner, E.P.F. Organisation, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Barkathpura, Hyderabad, bringing to his notice about the misappropriation of funds of the petitioner’s Society by the 2nd respondent, but the 1st respondent has not taken any action thereon till date. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.N.Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to make a detailed representation before the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub-Regional Office, Kadapa, within a period of two weeks from today, and on filing such a representation, the said authority shall dispose of the same as per law within a period of six weeks thereafter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 24.03.2009 v v