IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 17060 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAZACK T.R.N.S.VEGETABLE AND FRUIT STALL, BEACH ROAD, JUNCTION, TANUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, GNERAL AND HEAD LOADWORKERS UNION (CITU) TANUR, MALAPPURAM DIST. 2. THE SECRETARY,THE GENERAL AND HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION (INTUC) TANUR, MALAPPURAM DIST. 3. THE SECRETARY, SWATHANTHRA THOZHILALI UNION (STU) TANUR, MALAPPURAM DIST. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,TANUR. 5. THE ASST. LABOUR OFFICER, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM. ADV. SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR FOR R1-2 SRI.HARISH R. MENON FOR R1-2 SRI.KOSHY GEORGE FOR ADDL.R6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY // K.M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 17060 of 2009 B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph J., This is a petition filed seeking the following prayers: (i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 4th respondent to give adequate and meaningful protection of the petitioner, his brothers and his permanent employees for doing the loading and unloading work of the articles coming to his establishment R.N.S. Vegetables and fruit stall, without any lest or hindrance from the members of respondents 1 to 3 unions. (ii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the 5th respondent to register the names of Noufal, Subair, Hamsu and Sulaiman as the attached employees of the petitioner and to issue them necessary card in this regard to them. W.P.(C) No. 17060 of 2010 B 2 2. We heard the learned counsel representing the parties. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that after filing the Writ Petition, the workers of petitioner have obtained identity cards as per rule 26A. 3. In light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner is employing persons who have Ext.P3 to P6 cards and they are obstructed by respondents 1 to 3, protection shall be granted by respondent 4, for doing loading and unloading work through persons who got P3 to P6 cards. The protection will be extended to loading and unloading works also if it is done by the petitioner. K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE W.P.(C) No. 17060 of 2010 B 3 dl/