HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7448 of 2011 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 6, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.468 of 2010 on the file of the Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali, taken on file for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 342, 324, 506 r/w 34 IPC. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners mainly raised the following points for consideration: 1) Prior to lodging of the present complaint by the 2nd respondent which was registered as Crime No.50 of 2010, the petitioners lodged a complaint with the police and the same was registered as Crime No.49 of 2010. In F.I.R.No.50 of 2010, only 1st petitioner herein was arrayed as an accused and it does not contain the names of the other petitioners herein which clearly indicate that the police implicated the other petitioners as accused in this case to prosecute them. 2) The charge sheet reveals that some of the jewellery of 1st petitioner was stolen. 3) The present complaint is motivated one with an intention to wreck vengeance against the petitioners. 4) Investigation was completed within a period of one month and the charge sheet filed by the police clearly indicates the intention of the respondent police to implicate petitioner Nos.2 to 6 in this case. This Court perused the entire record. Lodging of the complaint by the petitioners herein prior to lodging of the complaint by the 2nd respondent, mentioning of the names of petitioners 2 to 6 in the charge sheet, and completion of investigation by the police within a short period, cannot be the grounds to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.468 of 2010 on the file of the Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali. Further, the charge sheet specifically reveals that on the night of 1.6.2010 at 7.00 p.m. the 1st petitioner and his followers, petitioners 2 to 6 herein, kidnapped L.W.2 from the house of L.W.1 and confined him in a room and also threatened him with dire consequences. So, the investigation reveals the involvement of petitioner Nos.2 to 6. It is also not expected that in all the cases F.I.R. should contain the names of all the persons. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not merit acceptance and the criminal petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed and the miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed shall stand closed. __________________ RAJA ELANGO, J 24th August, 2011 cbs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7448 OF 2011 (Dismissed) 24th August, 2010 cbs