IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-28378 of 2008 Date of decision : 16.1.2009. ... Sish Pal @ Sussu and another ................ Petitioners vs. State of Haryana and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Sh. J.S.Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) This is a complaint case. Previously, FIR was registered and cancellation report was submitted after due investigation. The petitioners were allowed the concession of anticipatory bail for a limited period till the decision of the application for grant of regular bail. That regular bail application was dismissed by the JMIC and thereafter petitioner filed a revision petition against the order of JMIC but that was dismissed as withdrawn on 21.10.2008. Petitioners are stated to have appeared before the learned trial Court in compliance of the order dated 3.11.2008. Crl.M. No. M-28378 of 2008 -2- So, in these circumstances, it is fit case to allow the application. So, the order dated 3.11.2008, passed by this Court is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 16.1.2009. Judge chug