IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3418 OF 2005 D. A. Patil Consultant Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Zilla Parishad, Satara & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. Pratap Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. M. B. Mehere for Respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. P. I. Khemani, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr.Uday Warunjikar for Respondent Nos.5 and 6. ..... CORAM : A.P. SHAH AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. June 27, 2005. P.C.: Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos.5 and 6. The contention that the Respondents do not possess the necessary qualifications seems to be without any merit. Moreover, after filing the petition, the Petitioner has withdrawn the earnest money. Under the circumstances, no interference is called for under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition is dismissed. ......