V ~ J #17 22.12.2010 Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. V.K. Kaira, Advocate. Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for the State/respondent. No.l along with SI/10 V.S. Deol, P.S. Shakarpur. Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Manjeet Kapil, Advocate. +Crl.M.C. Nd.3965/2010 This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No.674/2007 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPG registered at P.S. Shakarpur on the complaint of respondent No.2. Reason for seeking quashing is that the FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled in mediation proceedings held at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. ^°arties have placedon record copy of the terms of settlementrecordedby the mediator which was duly signed by all the parties. Petitioners are present. They are identified by their counsel Shri V.K. KaIra, Advocate. Respondent No.2 is present. She is identified by her counsel Shri Manjeet Kapil,^ Advocate as well as by the Investigating Officer. Parties confirm that they have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left between them and that they signed the original of settlement agreement placed on record on pages No.24 to 26 being Annexure A and they abide by the terms of settlement. Respondent No.2 submits that she has entered into aforesaid settlement with the petitioners of her own accord without any inducement Signing Date:05.08.2024 16:58:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified or pressure and as per settlement, the petitioner has agreed to pay her ?7,50,000/-, out of which ?5 lakhs have already been received by her and , balance ?2 lakhs has been received by her today vide a bankers cheque No.677457 dated 20.11.2010 for X2 lakhs drawn on State Bank of India and that now there no dispute left between her and the petitioners. She states that pursuant to the settlement she has obtained mutual consent divorce and in interest of the amicable relationship between the parties, i? she does not want any action againstthe petitionerson her FIR and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Learned APP for the State submits that the State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Since the parties have arrived at a mutual settlement, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings emanating from the same alive. Therefore, the FIR No.674/2007 registered at P.S. Shakarpur and the proceedings emanating of the same are quashed. Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE DECEMBER 22, 2010 . V