IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2007 / 1ST ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3894 of 2005(L) ------------------------- OS.1551/2000 of PRL.M.C.,IRINJALAKUDA PETITIONER: VARGHESE, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O. PAILY, KAITHARATH HOUSE, AJAY BHAVAN, VELLANGALLORE DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN RESPONDENTS: 1. AMBIKA, W/O. RAVINDRAN, UNNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, LOKAMALESWARAM, KODUNGALLUR. 2. SMITHA MENON, D/O. DO. DO. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF PLAINT O.S.1551/2000 DTD.16.10.2000 BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA INI.A.NO.2238/2003 IN O.S.1551/2000 DTD.30.6.2004. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE css/ PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 3894 of 2005 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of June 2007 JUDGMENT It is fairly conceded by Sri.Ranjith Thampan, the learned counsel for the petitioner that the directions issued by this court on 11.6.2007 have not been complied with. I have gone through the impugned order and heard the submissions of Sri.Ranjith Thampan. I do not think that the impugned order is vitiated to such an extent as to warrant interference by this court under supervisory jurisdiction which is accepted to be invoked only when it is absolutely necessary. Challenge against Ext.P2 fails. The writ petition will stand dismissed. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk