IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10004 of 2005 RAJENDRA PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.4649 of 2006 MD.MANAUR ALAM ANSARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.5471 of 2006 BINDESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.6401 of 2007 REHANA BEGAM Versus THE BHARAT WAGON AND ENGINEERI with CWJC No.9393 of 2007 LALITA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.14331 of 2007 BALMIKI PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17140 of 2007 SHREE KRISHNA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS with CWJC No.7938 of 2008 ASTURA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.8046 of 2008 AJIMA KHATOON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.8110 of 2008 RAMAKANT MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.8142 of 2008 TETARI DEVI 2 Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15191 of 2008 AJAY SHAHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15239 of 2008 SHANTI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15245 of 2008 CHANDRAKANT JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16640 of 2008 RAM SAWARI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16824 of 2008 SABITA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.17956 of 2008 BINDESHWAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.18797 of 2008 SHILA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.1088 of 2009 MEENA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 15.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. All the above writ applications are related to common issue with regard to their payment of retiral dues including the payment on account of G.P.F. which have not 3 been paid till date, as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the aforesaid grievances, petitioners propose to bring it to the notice of the concerned authority enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case, such claims are brought to the notice of the concerned authority by way of representations, the concerned authority shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioners could be settled with interest permissible under the rules. However, if any of the claims upon consideration are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with reasons thereof. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)