IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 26186 of 2006 Between: 1 The District Educational Officer, Karimnagar District at Karimnagar. 2 the Director of School Education, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 The Government of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND K.Narasimha Reddy, s/o Ashi Reddy, o/o U.P.S.Arepally, Mandal and District, karimnagar. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the orders made in M.A.No.1665/2005 in O.A.No.3266/2005 dated 12-9-2005 and further proceedings in Contempt Application No.753/2006 and quash the same by holding the same as contrary to law and erroneous and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners :GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent: . The Court made the following : ORDER: (per GM,J) Heard learned Government Pleader for Services-I and learned counsel for the respondent. At their request, the writ petition itself is disposed of finally at the interlocutory stage. This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the order passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, in M.A.No.1665 of 2005 in O.A.No.3266 of 2005, dated 12.09.2005, wherein the Tribunal directed the respondents therein to consider the claim of the applicant for posting him in the vacancy of PET available in nearby places of the present place of working, pending further orders. It is contended by the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the petitioners herein, that though the petitioners have ﬁled vacate stay application in the said O.A., being V.M.A.No.1469 of 2006, way back in the year 2006, the Tribunal has not disposed of the same, as yet, and that it is proceeding with the contempt application in C.A.No.753 of 2006, ﬁled by the applicant, when the vacate stay application is very much pending. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and since the vacate stay application No.1469 of 2006, ﬁled by the petitioners herein before the Tribunal, is still pending adjudication, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, we deem it appropriate to direct the Tribunal to dispose of the O.A. itself, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, C.A.No.753 of 2006 shall not be proceeded with. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J. Dated:06.09.2008 _____________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD,J. Note:Furnish C.C. in two days. (B/o) GJ