IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2008 / 9TH MAGHA 1929 WA.No.1747 of 2005(E) ---------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.37606/2003 Dated 24/06/2005 .................... APPELLANT/ PETITIONER:- ------------------------------------- UNDAN VASU, S/O.UNDAN, AGED 74 YEARS, EATTIKKAL MEPURATH HOUSE, ATHIKAYAM VILLAGE, RANNI. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (THIRUVALLA) SRI.ALEXY AUGUSTINE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ----------------------------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, VADASSERYKARA. 3. SRI. PRABHAKARAN, THADATHIL VEEDU, ATHIKAYAM VILLAGE, RANNI. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN. R2 BY SRI. ASOK M.CHERIYAN, SC, KSEB SRI.N.D.PREMACHANDRAN, SC, KSEB R3 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.A.No.1747 of 2005-E ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. The learned counsel appearing for the parties to the lis would inform us that, pursuant to the orders and directions issued by this Court, the respondent has already drawn electric line through the property of the appellant. In view this development, at this stage, it is not appropriate to interfere with the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, we reject the writ appeal. However, liberty is reserved to the appellant to make use of the alternative suggestions made by the learned Single Judge in the course of the order. (2). Consequently the prayer made in I.A.No.2576/2005 is also rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE MS