1 BILASPUR (C.G.) S9^ /2011 .^^ ^'^^"" ....•^" ^-•',^' ^'.,A- A'-^'' Bisahu Ram Kaushik, Aged about 53 years, S/o Late Ramadhar Kaushik, A'ssistant Block Education Officer, Takhatpur, Block Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education &.K.S. Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.6.) 3. Joint Director, Treasury, accounts and pension, Bilas'pur (C.6.) 4. District Education Officer Bilaspur (C.6.) M mentioned in the cause title. \ y '?• <-n HIGH COURT OF eHHATTISGARH AT BIL1USPUR SB :HON>BUBMR.JUSTICBPRITINKERDIWAK]BR W.P.ISl.NQ. 3928/2011 Bisahu Raia Kaushik versus Statc of Chhattisgarh & Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. A.G. fcr the State. WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB COBSTITUTION OF INDIA (22.07.2011) Wifh the consent ofthe parties, fhe niatter is heard finalfy. The petitioner was initially appointed ^ Deputy Teacher in fhe year 1988 on a fixed pay ofRs. 150. After coinpletion ofhis probation period, he was grauted regular pay scate of Rs. 169-300. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subaaits that the above issue has been consideicd by fhe M.P. State Adnriaistaati.ve Tribunal, Jabalpur ia O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madliukant Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. and others, whersin it was held that the siaularly situated teachers are entiUed to regular pay scale wifh effect fix>m. fhe date ofinitial appoiutinent. The uaatter was takcn up to tlie Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Honlafc Supreme Court upholding fhe decision of the Tribunal to fhe effect fhat fhe Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entifled to regular pay scale froin the date of initial appointinent. It is furtfaer subinitted ibat tlus Court while considermg ffae satae issue ia W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006 between Amar Sai Rcan & Others Vs. State of CMvxttisgarh and Others by order dated 01.09.06 allowed fhie petitioners to make a representation wittun a period of tea days, raising aB the gnevaBccs. Accordiugly ffae petitioner is granted Uberty to make a represeatation raising atl his grievance in the light of fhe aforesaid •judement and fhe circular dated 5.1.2011 (Annexmc P/2), aud in ^ tura the concemed respondent is directed to decide the reprcsentation, if any, in accordaace with law, on its own merits, wifhin a period of eight wceks Iroin ftie date of receipt of fhe representation subject to verification ofthe facts. lu view ofthe foTegoing, ttus petition is disposed of. No oider as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge B