IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.9399-M of 2010 Date of Decision:11.5.2010 Pankaj Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.69 dated 17.3.2008 registered under Sections 376 IPC at Police Station Shimlapuri, District Ludhiana. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from HC Bikramjeet Singh states that there is no other evidence against the petitioner except the statement of the mother of the victim. The mother has also resiled from her statement qua the present petitioner. On cross examination also, she did not make any allegation against the present petitioner. However, as per her statement, Ranjit Kumar @ Golgappa is the accused and the offence is committed by him. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana. 11.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE