1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7717 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. A.S.Bayas, Advocate for Petitioner. ........................... [ CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. ] DATE : 20/11/2009. PER COURT : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 13/12/2008 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for direction to the Talathi to produce original sale deed came to be rejected. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that on the basis of the evidence of P.W. 4, who was examined on behalf of plaintiff, it was necessary to direct the Talathi to produce sale deed 2 in as much as the said witness, who was Sub Registrar had deposed that the original sale deed was handed over to the Talathi for distributing it to the concerned persons. 3. The P.W. 4 Sub Registrar was examined on 27/9/2007. Thereafter, almost after the period of one year and 3 months, the present application came to be filed. After the evidence of both the parties is over and the matter is fixed for arguments, present application came to be filed. 4. Mr. Bayas, the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner submits that in the interest of justice, the present application deserves to be allowed. 5. The legal system is not concerned only with the interest of one party to the litigation. It is also to take into consideration the interest of the other side and ultimately the interest of justice. If a party is sleeping over its rights for months together, it can not be permitted to file an application for direction to produce document after the period of 1 year 3 months after the evidence is closed. No perversity is 3 noticed in the order and reasons given by the learned trial court, as such interference does not warrant. Hence, rejected. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP7717.09