IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2004 Superb Minerals (India) Pvt. Ltd. .. Appellant V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-I, Nashik & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. A.K. Jasani for the Appellant Ms. S.V. Bharucha for the Respondents CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 DATED : 07.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondents. Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 24.9.2003. The above Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order passed by the Assessing Officer determining total income of the Appellant at Rs. 2,67,892/- by treating the gross interest income received on Fixed Deposit Receipts as ‘Income from other Sources’? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in confirming the order passed by the Assessing Officer determining total direct and indirect costs at Rs. 98,08,304/- and not Rs. 95,53,387/- as worked out by the Appellant in computation of deduction under section 80HHC of the Act? 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the interest income/expenditure in respect of a business are to be considered on net basis and not on gross basis as has been done by the Assessing Officer in the case of the Appellant?" The learned counsel for the Respondents waives service. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)