H%GH €$L¥R§f @i CHg§TTI$§i£R8LB$L§§W§§ Wa'i‘t Pe‘tmon gm Nb. 1W2 of 20% Pefiiioner Prabandhak , Damik Nav—B‘narai: Nav-Bharat Press, Near Bus Siam, Bitaspur (Chhai'tisgaW Egrsus Resnandents ‘3‘, Akhn Pandey, sen 3f hri Manmahan La; Pandey; aged about 41 years, rlo‘ High Ccurt Eeaoj, Bilamr, CG. a) Presiding Officer, Labsur Cam, Bilaspur, uncier inausma) Déspute Act, ’1 §4Z BHaspur (CG). (Wm Petition under AriiciE 226 of the CGn3t§iuti¢n of :nd§a} $3: Hara’me WEI". Swm K. Agmhom, d. Wesem: Shri MKWas, counsewcrthe petmcner. $h§§ SP. Ka!e, caanse! {a the r$spcnd&n: N94. GRAL §RDER (Fassea on 17-32%) With consent of ieamed counse! appearing for bath ihe padies, the matter is heard fmahy. Learned counsei appearing for the petiiioner submits i'nat certain documenis which have been denied by the managemenfisecond party; have been d‘:rected to be admiti‘ed by order daied 8—2-2005} passed by Labour Court 2) Learned ceunsei aepeanng for the responcent No1 womd submii thai even if ine documents; are denied by the opposite parry No.2. the peiirimer herein, 'Ihe same can be admitted by the Labour Ccurr‘ for consideration. 3) Be i‘nai as it may, {he Labour Court, wniie considering the o’ocomenis; may rook into the deniai aeoects of the petitioner before paseing the order. 4} in View of the foregoing, this petition ie diemieeed. Consequentiy, i.A.No.’i stands disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ Sd/- Raju j’d‘y g * "r/gr