K/F lmj/ CO BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.6. w.P.(s) No $23 /11 $mm§§ é£§£§éx§ / PETITIONER: - Vijay Singh Rawaf S/o Lafe Bakhfawar‘ Singh Rawaf Agedz72 years EX-Ass‘H.Commandan‘r. R/o PIoT No.48/96, SakeT Colony Kaml Boad, S.A.F.Line Emd‘t Disff: burg C.G. ERSUS / RESPONDENTS: - 1. The sfa're of chha‘m’sgarh Through:- Police.Governmenf of Chhaffisgarh Raipur.C.G. 3. The Director General,Chha1‘fisgarh Special SAF Bhilai Disft Durg. 6.6. 4. The commandant. Firs‘r Baffal ion , Chhaffisgarh Special Army Force C.G. SAF Bhilai.Dis1‘1’.Durg C.6. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARIIMANDAMUS AND OTHER WRIT/WRITS /ORDERS ETC, 1.THE PAR‘HCULARS OF PETITIONER As mentioned in the above title. V fhe secre‘rary Departenf of Home,D.K.$.Bhavan,ManTraIaya, Raipur. The Director General of é HIGH COURT OFCHHATTlsGARH 1 BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 323 OF 2011 Petitioner , Vijay Singh Rawat Versus Respondents (Writ Petition under Article 226, 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present 1‘ Shri Arvind Kumar Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. hri ushii Db, Govemment vocate or t State. The State of Chhattlsgarh & Others (Pased 1 a ay s on this 2 dy of Janur. 201 1) v Learned ounsel appearing for the petitioner submits that thase, c e-c being ament of retiral benefits matte may b referred to the py r, e ion mtt pens comiee. This Court, in the matters of .P. o. 46421204 ainath ana! 2. W N 0 (Bj Md v. The State of hhtisgam & Others) an other conected Cat d n matters, directed the Committee to conside the mtter of retiral r a dues as th disputed uetio of facts were involved. The e qsn Committee was constitute h tate Goemment, rsuant o d by te S v pu t the order dated 19.06.200 a in W.P. No. 961/2 m. 6 pssed 1006 (St an mme ) er Keja Bai Chdrakar v. State Govent and others and ord a CC dated 13.03.2008 pssed in M... No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhatt’sgarh & Others v. Baljnath Mandel and another. ) Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31" of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandel (Supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the - Committee, within a period of 15 days fromthe date of receipt of a S S uey Ad f he ORDER ORAL 221$ copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shaii issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents, if necessary. I The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the teamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. ‘ Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok