THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO W.P.23663 OF 2001 Dated. 25-11-2010 Between: P.Maheswar Rao …petitioner Vs. The Project Officer, ITDA Bhadrachalam and others ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO W.P.23663 OF 2001 ORAL ORDER When called there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. The writ petition is filed challenging the recovery of the amount under the maintenance decree payable to the wife. Evidently, the petitioner has to satisfy the decree and it can be recovered even by an attachment. In order to avoid the delay and in the interest of justice the impugned order was evidently passed. There are no merits in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J 25-11-2010 TSNR