... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7341 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7341 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7341 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7342 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7342 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7342 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P for the Applicant. Shri Kumthekar for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State. Shri J.B. Kotecha appearing for the original complainant states that the complainant has filed criminal Revision Application No.209 of 2005 for challenging the same order of acquittal in which rule has been issued by this court and the said Revision Application is pending. A case is made out for grant of leave. Leave to prefer Appeal against acquittal is granted. Appeal is admitted. Call for Record and Proceeding. Action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 be taken. The Respondents shall be forthwith enlarged on appropriate bail. To be heard alongwith Criminal Revision Application No.209 of 2005. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE