'^M^' I imNliffM HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (Cl No.340 of 2009 PETITIONER G.D. KADA, S/o Late Shri Nathoo Ram Kada, Aged about 62 years, Retd. Assistant Director of Industries, O/o Directorate of Industries, Raipur, Residing at 94 Jawahar Nagar, Durg-492001 (CG) Versus RESPONDENT Shri P. Ramesh Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner, Working as Secretary, Department of Commerce and Industries, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantrataya, Raipur - 492001 (CG) CONTEMPT PETlTiON / CASE UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT. 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND8A Appearance: Mr. B.P. Rao, Advocate forthe petitioner. None for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (08.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitloner submits that after filing of the contempt petition, the respondent has issued notice for hearing of the appeal. In view of the above, presentiy, he seeks permission to withdraw this contempt petition. Permission granted. Accordingiy, Contempt Case (C) No. 340/2009 is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to fiie another petition, if such an exigency arises. Sd/- SunUKumar Sinha Judge ^.^