The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.22293 of 2010 Date: 07-09-2010 Between: T.Srinivasulu ..... Petitioner AND The Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.N.Madhava Rao for Mr.M.Sudheer Kumar Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: Order: The petitioner is the purchaser of the land admeasuring Ac.10-00 guntas, in Survey No.311 of Polaram Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, which was assigned to two ex-servicemen. It is his pleaded case that as G.O.Ms.No.1117, dated 11-11-1997, permits alienation of the land assigned to the ex-service men after the expiry of ten years therefrom, there was no legal embargo on his purchase of the said property from the ex-servicemen and that accordingly, he has purchased the same. He has also averred that on 12-05-2006, respondent No.1- the Tahsildar, Shabad Mandal, issued proceedings for mutation of his name in the Revenue record and that GO.Ms.No.1117, dated 11-11-1993, was categorically mentioned therein. In the present Writ Petition, the petitioner felt aggrieved by notice, dated 08-07-2010, issued by respondent No.1 whereby he was called upon to showcause as to why he should not be summarily evicted from the land in question. In my opinion, the petitioner is entitled to submit his explanation to the said showcause notice and avail his further remedy in the event an adverse order is passed by respondent No.1. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition at this stage. However, in view of the above-mentioned facts, which prima facie reveal that the petitioner has purchased the land in question in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.1117, dated 11-11-1993, and as his name was also mutated in the revenue record, in the event an adverse order is passed against him, he shall not be dispossessed atleast for a period of one month after communication of such an order to enable him to avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Subject to the above-direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel, to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.28414 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 7th September, 2010 lur