FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2395 OF 2009 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2009 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.S.S.Shinde i/b. M.S.Bhardwaj for applicant Mr.Shingapurkar for respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 15th JANUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard. Perused the application for condonation of delay and the reply. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit in support and considering that on account of administrative reasons, the delay has occurred, the delay deserves to be condoned. 2. Although, Mr.Shingnapurkar urges that the explanation is not satisfactory as 120 days delay has not been explained and for which reliance is placed upon a decision of the Supreme Court, to my mind, in the peculiar facts of this case, when there are no lack of bonafides or total negligence or callousness but the delay has occurred on account of administrative exigencies, it deserves to be condoned. The application is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the main application for admission on 22nd January 2010. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)