IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.10603 OF 2011 BHUNESHWAR YADAV @ BHUTTU YADAV @ BHUTTO YADAV SON OF AMBIKA YADAV, R/O VILL- KALYANPUR,P.S.+DISTRICT-JAMUI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------------------------------- 4 04/08/2011 Heard Mr. Ambika Bhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 364A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and 10, 13 and 16 of the Prevention of Unlawful Activities Act. One Ramesh Hembrum is the accused of the case which has resulted on the basis of fard-beyan of Mukesh Kumar whose father Upendra Sharma got the contract of repairing of canal under the Ajan Jalashay Scheme through the tender. The scheme was of rupees ten crores. Immediately after receipt of the contract telephone calls were made by Ramesh Hembrum for payment of levy of rupees five lacs by way of extortion. Earlier work was stopped. Later on the work was re-started and again the extortion money was demanded. Subsequently, Ramesh Hembrum and others caught the informant’s father and he was taken towards jungle. Later on his dead body was found. 2 Submission is that the petitioner is not involved in commission of murder and demand of ransom. He has been planted in this case unnecessarily. It has been found by the investigating agency that it was the mobile of the petitioner through which the deceased Upendra Sharma was contacted and from that very mobile demand of ransom was made. A person has been killed on account of his failure to make payment of ransom. Prior to killing the ransom was demanded in which petitioner’s mobile was used. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)