IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3859 of 2005 Between: C. Ramesh S/o Champalal, r/o H. No. 12-1-1994, Lalapet, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director General and Inspector General of Police Government of Andhra Pradesh, Lakidikapool, Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, North Zoone, City Civil Court, Compound, Secunderabad 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North Zone, Ramgopalapuram Police station, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad 4 The Circle Inspector of Polcie, Mr. Somasekhara Rao Lalaguda Police Station, Lalgud, Secunderabad 5 The Circle Inspector of Police, Jayarao, Tukaramgate Police Station, Tukaramgate, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus petition quashing or setting aside the illegal detention of Mr. Champalal, aged about 65 years H. No. 12-1-1994, Lalapet Secunderabad and Ashok Kumar S/o Champalal aged 25 years H. No. 12-1-194 Lalapet, secunderabad by directing the 3rd to 5th respondents to cause the production of the detainee before the Honourable Court forthwith and set him at liberty forthwith from the illegal detention of the 4th respondent and pass such other orders, as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.Y.RAJA RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : O R D E R (Per BN,J) The contention of the respondents is that the alleged detenue was never arrested, which is not disputed by the petitioner. The fact remains that the alleged detenue is not in custody as on today. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the illegal confinement, he is at liberty to take appropriate steps in redressal of his grievance, available to him in law. --------------------------- BILAL NAZKI,J --------------------------- L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J AVS DATE:22.03.2005 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Director General and Inspector General of Police Government of Andhra Pradesh, Lakidikapool, Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, North Zoone, City Civil Court, Compound, Secunderabad 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North Zone, Ramgopalapuram Police station, Ramgopalpet, Secunderabad 4 The Circle Inspector of Polcie, Mr. Somasekhara Rao Lalaguda Police Station, Lalgud, Secunderabad 5 The Circle Inspector of Police, Jayarao, Tukaramgate Police Station, Tukaramgate, Secunderabad 6. 2 CCs to G.P. for Home, for Advocate General, High Court of A.P. Buildings (OUT). 7) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}