1 cr­appa­1137­10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN. NO. 1137 OF 2010 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 665 OF 2010 Ashok Ganpati Waghmare and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Mr. P.G.Sarda Adv. for applicants Mr. S.A.Shaikh APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicants-original accused nos.1 and 3 and the learned APP for the State. 2 The applicants have been convicted for the offence under Sections 498-A, 304B and 306 r.w. 34 of IPC. The appeal preferred by the applicants is pending. The applicants are now seeking bail. 3 The learned advocate for the applicants seeks liberty to file a separate application for bail in respect of applicant no.1-Ashok Ganpati 2 cr­appa­1137­10 Waghmare and he is pressing this application for bail only in respect of applicant no.2-Subhadra Ganpati Waghmare. Liberty as prayed for, is granted. Hence, this application is being considered only in respect of applicant no.2. 4 The learned advocate for the applicant no.2 states that applicant no.2 was on bail during the trial and she has not misused the liberty granted to her. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. The learned advocate for the applicant no.2 also states that the applicant no.2 is a lady and hence, she may be released on bail. 5 Looking to the above facts and the fact that the applicant no.2 is a lady, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant no.2. 6 The applicant no.2– Subhadra Ganpati Waghmare be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. twenty five thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 7 Application is disposed of in above terms. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]