1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1721 OF 2005 The Tata Power Co Ltd .. Petitioner versus Mr Beloor Vijaykumar Anchan & ors .. Respondents ... Ms Mitra Das with Ms Vasanti Kunder for Petr Mr N.M.Ganguli for Respt no.1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 12th July 2005. : 12th July 2005. : 12th July 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The impunged order is passed under section 7 (4) of the Payment of Gratuity Act. Learned counsel for the respondents points out that an appeal against the said order is provided under sub-section 7 of 2 section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act. In the circumstances, in my view, the petitioner has an alternative efficicious remedy available. This is not a fit case for entertaining the writ petition. Hence, petition rejected. D.G.KARNIK, J