c^^)\^:Lf05 IN^THE^MDHY.i^PMDE^H.ST&TE^ABMIHISTRiTJ^^TRIBUN^L 'II^SiIiOiIIIIIOIIiilMli^IC" O .4 . OF 1995 SA.NTOSH RAO DHUM&L,AaSD &BOUT 50 TSiHS,S/0 SHRI SADiSHIV RAO DHUM1L,OOOU;D&IVEB,0/0 S.B.O. 1UBE WBLL GONSTilUGTION DIVISION, DISTT; 1MBI la'PUR (M .P . ) . .iPPLIGAIT -VerBus- ^ 1)STA.TB O? MADEI-A PRADBSHi THROUGEiSBCBETS.B.I, IRRIGATION DBPARTMaNT, 7ALLABH BHAW.iN , BHOP.AL (M •P.) . 2)gXdOUTI7E ENGIHBER, TUBE MELI. OONSTRUGTION DI7ISION, DISTT s &MBIK&PUR (M .P .) . 5)S»D.O. TUBB WELL GOHSTRUCTION DIVISIOH DISTTsAMBIKAPUR(M.P.) « BBT4ILS_._OF_&PPLIGA.TIOI •KBSPONDSNTS ^, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1192/2005 PETITIONER Santosh Rao Dhumal Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12 h day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Tuma