1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4945 OF 2009 Rajendra Govind Survase ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.M. Gaikwad, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 ..... CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Leave to correct the name of respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5 respectively as Chief Executive Officer instead of Chief Education Officer. Amendment be carried out during the course of day. 2 Grievance made in this petition is that the petitioner's application for appointment has been rejected by the Deputy Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Beed vide letter dated 2.7.2007. The only reason mentioned for rejection of the petitioner’s application is that 2 sufficient number of candidates did not respond to the advertisement and process was therefore terminated. 2 In the circumstances, in the facts of the present case, therefore, we dispose of this petition with direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to consider the application of the petitioner in future if any vacancy to be advertised subject to the eligibility of the petitioner alongwith other competing candidates. Petition disposed of on the above terms. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rlj/