HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.4907 of 2011 ORDER: These civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 6-9- 2010 passed in IA No.268 of 2010 in RC No.304 of 2005 by the IV Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad. IA No.268 of 2010 was filed under Rule 8(3) of Rent Controller Act read with Order 9, Rule 9 CPC to set aside the order dated 19-4-2010 and restore the RC to its original position and permit the petitioners to continue the proceedings. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned order passed by the Court. 3. The reason assigned by the petitioners for their non- appearance on the day when the case was called is that he went to Delhi for looking for a match for his son and further he could not contact his counsel for that reason. The reason was not found favour with the lower Court and therefore dismissed the IA. It is to be noted that the primary function of a Court is to adjudicate the dispute between the parties and to advance the cause of justice. The object of providing a legal remedy is to repair the damage caused by reason of legal injury. The main RC was filed for fixation of fair rents under Section 4 of the Rent Control Act. Further it is stated that the matter has come to certain stage i.e. the GPA of the petitioners was examined as PW-1 and the case is posed for cross-examination. In the circumstances, this Court is inclined to give one more opportunity to the petitioners to prosecute the matter. 4. In the result, the impugned order is set aside and the civil revision petition is allowed, at the admission stage itself. __________________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated: 3-12-2011 Nrg