IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 248 of 2011 Decided on: 19.7.2011 Laxmi Nand …Petitioner Versus Shri Akshay Sood and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice counsel. For the respondents : None. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, learned vice counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition in order to enable his client to file a fresh petition after serving the respondents with notice. Petitioner is permitted to file a fresh petition on the same and similar cause of action after serving notice upon the respondents. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 19, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No