IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 11TH MAY 2010 / 21ST VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14762 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. REMYA P.SASIDHARAN, PUTHUVELSTHALATHU HOUSE, PUTHUVYPU P.O. 2. DEVI PRATHAPAN, PUTHENVEETIL, MANJINAKKAD, NJARAKKAL. 3. ANILA M., ALLISSERIL, PUNNAPRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 4. CHITRA MOHANAN, KIZHAKKEMANAMPUZHA, NEDUVARAMCODE P.O., CHERIYANAD, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA. 5. JASON JACOB, THAZHATHUPARAMBIL, PLASSANAL P.O., KOTTAYAM. 6. AMBILY LIONA LAZAR, W/O.JOSE MATHEW, MARIA BHAVAN, NADAKAVU P.O., UDAYAMPEROOR, KOCHUPALLY. BY ADV. SMT.A.K.PREETHA SRI.M.R.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, TENHIPPALAM, CALICUT, REP. BY THE REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, TENHIPPALAM, CALICUT. ADV.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN STANDING COUNSEL FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 14762 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF MAY, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers. (i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to revalue the answer scripts of the petitioners and declare the revaluation results expeditiously and (ii) to declare that the delay in declaring the revaluation results of the petitioners amounts to shirking of statutory duties. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that only one petitioner has filed application for revaluation and actual factual position is still to be ascertained as to whether such applications, if at all preferred by the petitioners are proper and pending. The learned Standing Counsel also submits that if the applications have been received and are W.P.(C)No.14762/10 -2- otherwise in order, the same can be considered and finalised within a period of six weeks. 3. In the above facts and circumstances, the respondents are directed to finalise the applications stated to be preferred by the petitioners, if the same are in order otherwise and publish the results of the revaluation within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE dsn