HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1300 OF 2009 Dated: 30-10-2009 Between: The Special Officer-in-charge, Telegraph Traffic Employees Cooperative Credit Society (Regd.No.T.A.206), Office of the Divisional Coop. Officer, Golkonda Division, Block M-5A, AP Housing Board Manoranjan Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad, rep., by its Person-in- charge Committee Chairman, Sri S. Nagendra Prasad, S/o.S.K.Sarma, aged about 48 years, BSNL Service, R/o.1-5-731/104, S.V. Nilayam, New Maruthi Nagar, Kothapet, Hyderabad-60 ... APPELLANT AND D. Suryanarayana Murthy and ten others ... RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1300 OF 2009 JUDGEMENT: (per Sri C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy,) At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ appeal is taken up for admission and disposal. This writ appeal has been filed against ad interim order dated 09-04-2009 in WPMP No.9762 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 7430 of 2009. Sri A.K. Jayaprakash Rao, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that on receipt of a copy of interim order, the appellant has filed an application for vacating the interim order on 08-06-2009 and that the same is yet to be disposed of. The learned counsel submitted that while the vacate stay application is pending, the respondents have filed a contempt case which is being pressed by them even before the vacate stay application is disposed of. According to the learned counsel, ad interim order, which is impugned in this writ appeal has a result of allowing the writ petition itself. Sri D. Kodandarama Murthy, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that his clients have no objection for disposal of the vacate stay application before the contempt case is disposed of. He also undertook that his clients will not press for the contempt case till the disposal of the vacate stay application. Inasmuch as the vacate stay application is pending before the learned single Judge, we refrain from making any observations on the merits of the writ appeal. In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the respondents, we dispose of the writ appeal by placing the above mentioned statement of the learned counsel for the respondents on record. Ordered accordingly. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 30-10-2009 ks Note: Furnish copy by 03-11-2009. B/O ks