1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.F. NO. 189/2010 IN F.A. ST. NO. 471/2010 (Shankarrao Jayramji Chavhan VERSUS Kamal Prabhakarrao Dhanokar) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.J. Mirza, counsel for the applicant. Shri D.S. Dharaskar, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JUNE 8, 2010 . Heard. By this civil application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 525 days in filing the first appeal. The applicant has stated the reasons for the delay caused in filing the first appeal in paragraph 3 of the civil application. The non-applicant has objected to the prayer made in the civil application by filing a reply. The contents of paragraph 3 of the civil application have, however, not been specifically denied by the respondent in the reply filed to the civil application, though certain statements of facts pertaining to the negligence of the applicant in prosecuting the matter before the trial Court are stated. The statements of facts made in paragraph 3 of the civil application are, therefore, not seriously controverted by the respondents. 2 Hence, for the reasons stated in paragraph 3 of the civil application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned subject to the payment of costs of Rupees Seven Hundred and Fifty in the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within a period of ten days. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE APTE