IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7871 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DIPAK KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Some substance meant for explosive substance was recovered from co-accused Kailash Yadav and Niwas Yadav. They disclosed the name of this petitioner as owner of those articles also basing which petitioner’s house was searched from where two country made pistols recovered, his brother Amit was also found present in the house. In that circumstance, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is made accused due to being brother of Amit is of no substance including his being employee of Railway. Recovery of fire arms does not justify bail to this petitioner. In the facts of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)