*1* chs.2002.09.s.2684.08.911.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.2002 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2684 OF 2008 Shantanu Prakash Vaidya. ..Plaintiff -versus- Vaijayanti Prabhakar Vaidya and another. ..Defendants ............ Ms.Pooja Jalam, for the Plaintiff. Ms.Nikita Trivedi i/by U.R.Ghurye, for the Defendant No.1. ............ CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 07th December, 2011. P.C.: 1 In the light of the statement made in the affidavit in reply to this Chamber Summons, it is apparent that unless and until the Plaintiff makes an application seeking to rely upon the copies of originals and makes out a case for relying on such copies as proof of his claim in the suit, there is no question of copies of documents/ annextures to the plaint being taken as proof of the claim of the Plaintiff in the suit. Once such clarification is given, then, the request to grant inspection of copies would not survive. 2 Needless to clarify that all contentions of parties in relation to the application which would be made by the Plaintiff to rely upon the copies, are kept open and such an application would be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. 3 Needless to further state that inspection of originals of documents, which are annexed as Annextures B, D, E, F, G, H, J & K *2* chs.2002.09.s.2684.08.911.sxw having been already given to the Defendant No.1, the Plaintiff can rely on the said documents, but as far as others are concerned, in my view, this order will take care of the apprehension of the contesting Defendant No.1. The Chamber Summons is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)