1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7060 OF 2009 Rukhmani Krishnan .. Petitioner versus Prafulkumar Raghavji Kenia & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Mohan P. Tekavde for the petitioner. Mr.J.R.Vakil for the respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th August 2009. P.C.: . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that an application has been made before the trial Court seeking permission for examining the son of the petitioner who is the constituted attorney of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he is not pressing this petition on merits. He, however, submits that a direction issued by the trial Court against petitioner’s advocate to pay costs be set aside. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- plaintiffs submits to orders of the Court as far as the direction regarding payment of costs is concerned. He states that as the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits, the respondents have no objection, if instead of examining the petitioner, her son is examined. 2 2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Hearing of the suit is expedited. The direction issued by the trial Court to the advocate for the petitioner to pay costs is quashed and set aside. (A.S.OKA,J)