c r-v- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. No. ^%'5^ of 2005 PETITIONER y'\ o®'2- DEFENDANTS /'2. Ajaz Khan, S/o. Late Shahzad Khan, Aged about 57 years, Occupation - Deputy Ranger at Khairagarh, Division Range^South Bor Jalav, Head Quarter, Baghnadi, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, C.G. Raipur WRIT PETITJONJ[NDER ARTICLE 226, 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —aa*^-D^^^uan^i^Enast_r£sriectfuIhLstatesas under: - XI-HC-22 3^ '<11<IIM<<, ®TTI«'IS,fe|^|y^< 3^ £( ?T>4^^ HlfMI !*)*<|ch^.^a^l^ <FR; 200 sn^rqii f^ri^sn^T sblRi N;?lf?(T afi^lgwiw^cT tillfCT^'l WRTT' ff fe><fl tRl'triK. ^3Tf^ir3Ti^r v represe|atation Hst iradation On a inentioa beins Mrs. Hamida Siddiau^ Mr. Saadeep Dubey, (] Heard. At fhe outset ledaied flie petitioner is workuig as and in the senioriU7 Ust (Anaexure P-3) his senioritsj the petitioner inade ui flie said gradation reprepentation flled by the have issued anoflier (Anitexure P-1) and to the u( has been chauged aad reck( fhat as per infonnation of held fhe nieeting of shortly for proiuotioQs to aUowed then fhe petitioner'^ She further subiuits th.at already pendiag before circuinstaaces aad lookmj aUowed to niake a represeiih of 05 davs and ia tum l-e[ represcntation df fhe petitio^ mlade;, the inatter is taken up for hearing. |, counsel for the petitioner. ^ovt. Advocate for the State. |counsel for tlie petitioner subniitted that [Deputy Ranger ui the Forest Department |}f Deputy Rangers issued on 1.4.2001 was icckoned at Sr. No.78. Thereafter, to the respondents for correction however, without considering fhe Ipetitioner on 9.12.2004 the respondents Ust ofDeputy Rangers as on 1.4.2004 |tter surprise of the petitioner his seniority loned at Sr. No.244. She furfller subinits petitioner the respondents are gohig to Proiuotional Committee vei-v |th.e post of Rangers and if tlie same is right is likely to be seiiously prejudiced. fhe representation of fhe petitioner is the respondents, fherefore, in the |to paucity of time, £he petitioner inay be tation to respondeut No.2 within a period ipondent No.2 be directed to decide the [aer bcfore the DPC ineeting is held. ^sa__a< tbe Depjartraental ^lW XI-HC-22 sn^T^r f^;lN;3T|^T shxitifffga' shnit) r», ^f ^ s^^fivv^l, w^w'w, Riwvy. 3ii^i ^acft tmcITsn«llth"-"""""'"""""Wj' 200 aii^i swiwflfer 2j Mt- wifliin On tlie ofher haad, as allbwiag the petitioner to bas no objection. He has ;iveu for decidiag tlie repi^-s^ Haviag heard leanied to tlie facts aad circumstancl inake a representation respondent No.2 raisiag aU| No.2 is directed to decide objective inauaer after takiq him withia anofher four repi-esentation ta accordanc^ With fhe direction afoit Consequenfty, M.W.P.I Certified copy as per if <ni<iff]<fl.) ii<ici)'?''feLt'l <l»l+<il< ^;3Tf^IT3I]^T -. Dubey, Govt, Adv. subinits fhat as far niake a representation is concemed, he ^lso uo objection if a reasonable time is intation. 'ounsel for the parties and havuig regard ^es ofthe case, the petitioner is ailowed to a period of 05 days fi-oia today to bis grievances aad ia tum respondent the representation of petitioner ia an into consideratiQn ttie pouits raised by ^yeeks froin the date of receipt of fhe fc with law. 1'esaid, fhe petition stands disposed of. |No. 1065/04 also staads disposed of. lules. _,-—-"Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo jud9e