R^,w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 4791 of 2007 RESPONDENTS fe ^i Shri Agrasen Bha\van Samiti, through its V'ce President Shri Natwar Lal Agrawat, aged. 50 years, son of Shri Motilal Agrawal, resident of. New Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distriot Biiaspur(CG}. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Seoretary, Industry and Commeree, Ralpur (CG). Registrar, Firms. and Societies, Raipur (C.G,). Assistant Registrar, Firms and .Sooieties; Raipur (C,G). . Bilaspur Agrawala Sabha, through its Secretary Shri Oivarika Prasad Agrawala, aged about 63 years, son of. Shri Gajanan Agrawaia, Rjshi Coiony, IndiraWard Bilaspur, Tahsi! and District Bi.laspur (C.G.). (Writ Pefition urider.Article 226/227 ofthe Constitutton of india) SB: Hon'bie . Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present Shri M.D. Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. :•., Shri Suryakant Mishra, Pane! Lawyer forthe State. 1) 2) 3) 4) (Passedon 1S'l'August, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.4 has preferred an appeai before the Registrar, Firms and Societies, Raipur, against the order dated 19-4-2006 passed by the Assistant Registrar, Firms and Societies, Biiaspur. The petitioner raised a preliminary objection before the Registrar, Firms and Societies, Raipur, before admission ofthesaid appeal, but thesame was rejected videorder dated 14-3-2007. :^^^'^:^@i®l^l^^ —^SSr^eiiC^ a v-'i,, -•i'2.^ a.^ 2) Being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred an appeai before the State Government. The State Government by order dated 25-4-2007 declined to entertain the appeaion the ground that no appea! to the State Government is maintainabie against the order passed by the Assistant Registrar, Firms and Societies. 3) Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner further submits that there is a factuai error as the impugned order before the State Government was not passed by the Assistant Registrar, Firms and Societies, but the same was passed by the Registrar, Firms and Societies, rejecting the preiiminary objection ofthe petitioner. At thls stage, iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does notwantto press other points, exceptthatthe Registrar, Firms and Societies, Raipur, be directed to considerand decidethe appeal fiiied by the respondent No.4 pending before the Registrar, Firms and Societies, Raipur, expeditiousiy, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 to 3/State-has no objection. 4) it is ordered accordingiy. 5) The Registrar, Firms and Societies, Raipur, is directed to afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and decide the appea! .fiied by the respondent No,4 expeditioysly, on its own merit, in accordance with !aw. 6) inviewoftheforegoing.thispetition isdisposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge raju