IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24641 of 2010 BINA DEVI @ VEENA DEVI W/O LATE JYOTI LAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 06.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is the informant of the case which was instituted for the murder of her husband by unknown miscreants. The petitioner has been suspected to be involved in the occurrence since the petitioner had illicit relationship with one Arvind Yadav and therefore, she got this occurrence committed by said Arvind Yadav and Ranjan Kamkar. Considering that the entire case is merely based on suspicion, let the petitioner above named, who is a lady be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of 2 learned S.D.J.M. Bikramganj (Rohtas) in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 69/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )