CRM No. M-29205 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM No. M-29205 of 2010 Decided on:- 22.12.2010 Beer Singh and another ……Petitioners Versus State of Haryana …….Respondent Present Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate and Sh.Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate the petitioners. Mr.K.C.Gupta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. S.S.SARON, J Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioners prays for regular bail in a case registered against them on 31.12.2009 at Police Station Madlauda, District Panipat for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 304-B IPC. As per allegations of the prosecution, Bhawna deceased was married with Dharambir son of the petitioners on 15.2.2009. The FIR has been registered on the complaint of Sonu, who is the brother of Bhawna (deceased). The petitioners are the parents in law of Bhawna. As per allegations in the FIR they had harassed her. Roshni Devi, (petitioner no.2) was discharged vide order darted 5.3.2010 (Annexure P4) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Panipat. The police after investigation filed the challan. However, petitioners were not sent up for trial. Thereafter the statement (Annexure P5) of the complainant Sonu PW1 was recorded on 8.6.2010 and he was cross examined on 15.6.2010. On the basis of the statement Annexure P5 of Sonu PW1, an application dated 15.6.2010 Annexure P6 was filed for summoning the petitioners as additional accused. CRM No. M-29205 of 2010 2 Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat vide order dated 26.7.2010 (Annexure P7) summoned the petitioners as additional accused in terms of Section 319 Cr. P.C. The petitioners were not initially sent up for trial as they were found innocent, besides Roshni Devi petitioner no.2, was initially discharged vide order dated 5.3.2010 (Annexure P3). In consequence of the order dated 26.8.2010( Annexure P10), passed by this Court, the petitioners surrendered before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat. They filed an application for grant of bail which has been declined vide order dated 28.9.2010 (Annexure P11). The prosecution is to establish and prove its case by leading evidence. The petitioner no.1, is stated to be of 72 years old and petitioner no.2 is 66 years old. The trial in the case is likely to take time. In these circumstances, the petitioners on their furnishing personal bond and surety each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate / Duty Magistrate, Panipat shall be admitted to bail. CRM stands disposed of. 22.12.2010 ( S.S.SARON) mamta JUDGE