IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7443 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 22, 2011 Sarista Devi .. Petitioner Vs. Karan Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J This petition assails the order dated 29.9.2010 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Narwana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was dismissed. After hearing learned counsel for the parties at length, it transpires that the petitioner wants to add the alternative name of Balwinder Singh as “Lakhwinder Singh”. The amendment sought for is just a removal of the clerical mistake which could be rectified. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prove by way of evidence if there is no such person by the name of Amarjit Singh son of Balwinder Singh or Amarjit Singh son of Balwinder Singh @ Lakhwinder Singh. The delay caused in filing the application could be compensated with costs. Consequently, the instant petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is permitted to amend the plaint as prayed for subject to payment of `3000/- as costs. March 22, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge