HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.24902 of 2011 Date: September 06, 2011 Between: Kotikallapudi Satyavathi … Petitioner And 1. Sub-Inspector of Police, Atreyapuram Police Station, East Godavari District & 3 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.24902 of 2011 O R D E R: The petitioner states that against unlawful interference of the fourth respondent she had already approached this Court through W.P. No.11443 of 2010 and by order dated 01.6.2010 passed in W.P.M.P. No.14535 of 2010 the following interim order was passed: “Pending further orders, the petitioner is permitted to break open the lock, if any, placed by respondent No.1, as alleged by the petitioner and re-occupy the plot bearing No.35 admeasuring of Ac.0.02 cents in Sy.No.74/3A of Merlapalem village, Atreyapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. The respondent shall not in any manner interfere with the possession and occupation of the said property by the petitioner.” 2. The petitioner states that subsequently the injunction suit filed by her against the fourth respondent was decreed on 11.8.2011 and in spite of the order of this Court as well as the decree of injunction, the fourth respondent with the assistance of the first respondent is once again repeatedly trying to harass the petitioner to vacate the house. In paragraph No.4 of the affidavit, the petitioner states that ‘two weeks back the fourth respondent and his men have tried to dispossess me from the house by entering into the house and disturbing the household articles. With the assistance of my relatives, I protected my possession and later I gave complaint to the first respondent against the fourth respondent requesting to take action against him as there is threat to my life’. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Writer of the first respondent has recorded the said oral complaint, but no action has been taken thereafter. 3. It is obvious that there is neither any copy of complaint filed nor any acknowledgment produced by the petitioner in support of the aforesaid statement as such it is difficult to accept the claim of the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Home submits that though she will have to get instructions in the matter on the allegations made by the petitioner, but if the petitioner makes any specific complaint, definite action will be taken thereon by the first respondent. 5. In view of the orders of this Court extracted above as well as the injunction decree obtained by the petitioner against the fourth respondent from a competent civil Court on 11.8.2011, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the actions of the fourth respondent, it is for him to make appropriate complaint to the first respondent for necessary action and if such complaint is made, the first respondent shall take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law. 6. In view as above, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Date: September 06, 2011. BSB