{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4373 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.348 OF 2009 Jalil s/o Rasool Karvel APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Amit S.Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 29th July 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of 57 days’ delay caused in preferring criminal revision challenging judgment and order passed in criminal appeal No.42/2008 decided by Additional Sessions Judge, Latur vide judgment and order dated 13.07.2009. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. It appears that the delay is not intentional, however it is inadvertent. In the premise, it is not necessary to issue notice of this application to {2} the respondents. For the reasons stated in paragraphs No.2 and 3 of the application, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. Applicant is at liberty to take circulation after registration of the revision application. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln4373-09 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4372 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.348 OF 2009 Jalil s/o Rasool Karvel APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Amit S.Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 29th July 2010 PER COURT: 1. At the oral request of learned counsel for applicant, leave to amend the application by incorporating the statement that the entire amount is deposited by the applicant in the lower court. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Applicant is liberty to take circulation after carrying out the amendment. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln4373-09