IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 18701 of 2010 Date of Decision: 13.10.2010. M/s. Jindal Trading Co. & others --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 to 4 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioners claim to be licensees under the Punjab Agriculture Produce Marketing Agents, carrying business at Gohana. The respondent-Market Committee formulated a scheme for establishing a new Grain Market. Under the scheme plots were to be allotted to the existing licensees. The petitioners applied for allotment of the plots under the scheme. The grievance of the petitioners is that their claim for allotment of plots has not been considered. Petitioners served a representation (Annexure P-6) in this respect followed by a reminder (Annexure P-7) but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 18701 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation served by the petitioners, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 13.10.2010. lucky