1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Second Appeal No. 317/1996 (Pandurang Kondbaji Mahajan VERSUS Bhaiya @ Morba Kashinath Mahajan & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JULY 9, 2008. C.A. NO. 4725/2008. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. By this civil application, the parties to the second appeal seek a disposal of the second appeal in terms of the compromise recorded in the application. The application for recording the compromise in terms of the application is signed by the appellant no.2, respondent no.1, respondent nos.2 (a) & 2(b) and respondent no.3. The application is also signed by the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondents. It is necessary to mention that all the parties to the second appeal have signed this application. The appellant no.1 Pandurang Mahajan has expired during the pendency of the second appeal but his name is not deleted from the record. It is informed that all the legal heirs of Pandurang are 2 already arrayed as party appellant no.2 and respondent nos.2(a) and 2(b) to the second appeal. The counsel for the parties are present. All the parties are personally present in the Court today. I have verified about the terms of the compromise and the agreement of the parties thereto, from the parties who are personally present in the Court today. All the parties have submitted that they have signed the application and they are ad-idem over the terms of the compromise mentioned in the application. I have perused the terms of the compromise and they appear to be just and reasonable. Hence, for the aforesaid reasons, the civil application needs to be allowed and the second appeal could be disposed of in terms of the compromise recorded in the instant application. The second appeal is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the compromise recorded in the application. Decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE APTE