IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAniSGARH AT BJLASPUR Contemot Petition No...l.^..^..of2006 ^ PETITIONER 1) 1& ft; .•»°"j> <%'" ^ \"Y'%^>.^''"- 2) .-•-''.<3^.>'" ^.' d;.-1" Vereus RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS 1) bf^ ;.'-/ Shankar S/o Goretal, Kapoor Singh Dapahai P.0 Chirimiri Chirimiri, Dist. Korea (CG) Janki Bai W/o Gorelal Kapoor Singh Dapahai Chirimiri PO: Korea ShriBKSinha, Chairman cum Managing Director, SECL.Bilaspur 2) Swapan Kumar Goswami, Sub Area Manager, Chirimiri Area ^ Contemet Retition underarficle215 ofthe Constitution of India and Section 12 of the ContemBt ofCourt Act 1971 arisina out of order passed by this Hon'ble Cpurt, dated 3.^2006 in W P No: 2608'of 2003 f 9-\ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Sinfile Bench: Hon'ble Shrl Satish K. Agaihotri, J. Cont. Pet. No. 144 OF 2QQ6 Petitioner : Shaiikar Versus Respoadents Shn B.K. Sinha, & another Shri Gaiy Mukhopadhyay, counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ORAL ORDER i (26t" July, 2006} This court by order dated 3.2.2006 passed in W.P. No. 2608/2003, directed the respondents to consider the case ofthe petitioner No. 1, in accordance with law, as appUcable at fhe time of inaking the application for appointinent on coinpassionate grouiid wifhin a period ofsix weeks froim the date ofreceipt/production ofa copy ofthis order. Leamed couasel appearfag for the petitioner, subinits that the respondents have considered and rcjected case of the petitioner No.l for appointnient. No conteinpt has been inade out, in view of the fact fhat duTection passed by this Court has been coiaplied wifh. Accordingly, this appUcation stands disinissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge c^ t1