HIGM COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISiOKBiNCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,C.J.& HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CMANDRAKAR, J. MisG.ADDealfC)No.779of2009 Appellant Claimant ResDondents Oppositeparty Smt Neeta Chopra, aged about 40 years, wife of Vikram Chopra, aged about 50 years, resident of Quarter No.A-6, Vishal Nagar, Telibandha, Police Station Civil Line, Raipur Tahsil and District Raipur (CG) VERSUS Neelam Namdey Ekka, aged about 34 years, son of Charls Ekka resident of F-8, Shanti Nagar, Pol[ce Station Civil Line, Raipur Tahsil arid District Raipur Tahsil and District Raipur(CG) Director General of Police Police Head Quarters, Near Raj Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Government of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Raipur(CG) ApDeal under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicle Act Present: None fbr the appellant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General forthe State/respondentsNo.2and 3. < ORDER >th (28r"July,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta,CJ. C] "^-^. ^&ubbu F None for the appellant. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, weare leftwith no otheroption, butto dismiss the appeal forwant ofprosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge