IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19972 of 2010 Baljeet Singh Khatkar Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.R.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was awarded punishment of stoppage of one increment without cumulative effect. In the meantime, the pay revision took place and accordingly the pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed. His grievance is that the increment which will have to be allowed to him after one year has not been taken into account while re-fixing his pay in the revised scale. For the same cause, the petitioner had filed a representation, Annexure P-3, with a grievance that his pay has not been rightly fixed. Instead of considering the objection, the General Manager has simply responded that his pay has been verified by the A.O. Karnal and hence has returned the service book. It would be appropriate to dispose of this writ petition to direct the respondents to consider the representation, Annexure P-3, filed by the petitioner in accordance with law and pass an appropriate speaking order indicating whether the petitioner's pay has been rightly fixed or not. Let this exercise be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. If the petitioner is still left with any grievance, he may take any appropriate action in accordance with law. November 10, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE