T .^ s /^A \ <sr7$2——- IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) No.^5°9~ Of2011 PETITIONER: / Smt. Sudha Tiwari W/o Shri Ram Baran Tiwari , aged about 58 years, Principal, Govemment Boys Higher Secondary School Nariyara, Block Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa , R/o Nariyara, District Janjgir Champa (CG). RESPONDENTS: ^l. ^2. ^ •X Versus The State; of Chhattisgarh, through tUe Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). The District EduCation Officer, Durg, District Janjgir Champa (CG). The Block Education Officer, Akaltara , District Janjgir Champa(CG). WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrrUTION OF INDIA ^/Si^HC-22 '^^ W^T^T r<riJ5h ^^\ 5h4-iict> -Mf^a \ ' \ ~^^ ^WM^, ^nl^^Ko, ^xnK-iy an^r x?^? ^..U.^&....%-.??7/^ ^ ^ITH^f ^rHl^ '"^ •^^sr' V3TT^T ^Tc[T^R ^Tftn SB : IHon'bte Shri Manlndiii Mohaa Shrivastava, J.I 10.5.2011 Shri Suryakant Mishraj, Shri Y.S. Thakur, State/respondents, on adva4ce Heard on admission. Leamed counsel the petitioner is entitied to account of she havlng appointment at her own involved in ftie present same has been finaUy fhe case of Asha Saxiena appe^ring pa^sed' ct>st. deeid^d MPJR fSC) S9. similar view in its ord< W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. <=bi^(<n<flTi ^rm^tf ^ 'fT'st <Ryi<^i< ^3Rf;<R^3^T counsel for tihe petitioner. Dy. Advocate General for fhe copy. for ftie petitioner submits that Kienefit of two advance tacrements on l' B.Ed. examination before 1aer It is submitted fliat the issue petilion is no longer res integra and ttie by fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court in ds. State ofM.P. & Ors.. ^009 flZO t(S, It is further submitteft fhat fhis Court has also taken a ^r dated 06-02-2009 passed in JLeamed counsel for the petitioner further draws attention of f|us Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying iipon the judgment of the Supreme pourt in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and fhe order passedi by this Court in another Writ Appeal •[^: :1XI-HC-22 3^T^T T^jch 3:ni^r 5t)^lict» ^Tfi^T • "A^-: Prenreea ^ ~3^[ -<41<41d<LI, ^Tll^l^Ko, f^<rlK-iy 3T?^T "qiI^R ^IHdS 5bHiGh*<*"*****"***'*"*"**" *'"****'**'?T;^ 20° fN^BT* -y\ No.87/2009, directions hav^ caserfbi^ gRant of two advarj <^11LI(r1<flv1 ^l^<^l*'1?f^Tst <f^1^1< '^3Tf^R3T^T been issued for consideration of ftie ce increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974.issued by th^ State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofttie facts plead Leamed counsel for 1 the petitioner would also be In view of the stat^ ^d in the petition. [he respondents submits fhat case of bonsidered on the same lines. |ment made above, this petition is finally disposed off wifh a di|rcction to fhe respondent aufhorities to consider and decide flie c|^im of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per ^irciilar dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Prad|esh, after verification of fhe facts pleaded in fhe petition»wifh|na pericxl of fhree monfhs froni the date of receipt of copy of fhis| order. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^5