IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.M.JAMES WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST NOVEMBER 2006 / 10TH KARTHIKA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 6470 of 2006() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.666/2006 OF ALAPPUZHA NORTH POLICE STATION. PETITIONER/ACCUSED ------------- KARUNAKARAN, S/O.RAMAN, PUTHENVELLIYIL HOUSE, WARD NO.20, CHERTHALA NORTH, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL SRI.ANILKUMAR.K.N.PILLAI RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT AND STATE ----------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.N.SUKUMARAN. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.M. JAMES, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.6470 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st November, 2006. O R D E R Petitioner is before this Court for a pre-arrest order, as he apprehends arrest in Crime No.666/2006 of Alappuzha North Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 471 and 511 of 468 IPC. The contention between the petitioner and the de facto complainant is centering around the execution of an alleged promissory note, by the de facto complainant in favour of the petitioner. It is submitted that the lawyer notice issued by the petitioner was replied denying the transaction of the complainant. However, the said reply notice was returned unserved, as there was no addressee in the address given in the communication. He, therefore, filed a complaint before the court below, which has been forwarded to the police station, and the above crime has accordingly been registered. 2. I heard the arguments advanced by both sides. Considering the facts situation, I dispose of the application, directing the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer of BA.No.6470/2006 2 Alappuzha North Police Station, who is investigating the Crime No.666/2006 of that police station, on 9.11.2006, between 9.30 and 10 a.m. 3. The Investigating Officer shall interrogate the petitioner, and in the event of his arrest, he shall be released on bail, on he executing a bond for Rs.20,000/=, with two solvent sureties, each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the investigating officer arresting him. 4. Petitioner shall report before the investigating officer, as and when required, till the completion of the investigation. J.M. JAMES, JUDGE nj.