IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 12th day of October, 2011 1st Bail Application No.837 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Smt. Teena W/o Late Sri Deepak D/o Ramesh Chandra, R/o Village Kurana Khas, P.S. Matloda, District Panipat (Haryana) ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 43 of 2011, Under Section 302, 364, 20B I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar Hardwar District –Hardwar. 1 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicant Smt. Teena, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 43 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 302, 364,120B I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar Hardwar, District Hardwar, has sought her release on bail. Applicant is a woman. She is not named in the First Information Report. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. It is said that applicant who is widow of the deceased had relations with co-accused Sandeep and she got her husband killed. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that merely on 2 suspicion the above story has been developed against the applicant. It is pointed out that co-accused Sandeep has already been directed to be released on bail. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Smt. Teena, be released on bail, on her executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 12.10.2011 JM