THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22676 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of property bearing No.1-10-286 of Pedda Thokatta, Boinpally, Secunderabad. According to him, respondent No.2 made illegal construction upon it. Reference is made to the proceedings that are initiated in various Courts as well as Secunderabad Cantonment Board. His grievance is that even though the notice issued by respondent No.1 for demolition has become final, he is not taking any steps to remove the unauthorised construction. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 refused to receive the notice. Therefore, he is deemed to have been served. It may be true that the notice issued by respondent No.1 proposing to demolish the unauthorised structure has become final and respondent No.1 was under obligation to remove the structure. However, it is brought to the notice of this Court that respondent No.2 filed W.P.No.27477 of 2010 before this Court and obtained an interim order against the notice issued for demolition of premises. The petitioner can get himself impleaded in that writ petition and pursue the remedies. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:01.02.2011 kdl