IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22833 of 2010 RAJU SINGH @ RAJEEV RANJAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code was added. The petitioner is named in the First Information Report since the Informant alleged that the petitioner was also involved in the occurrence of kidnapping of her husband. Thereafter, the brother and brother-in-law of the victim were already examined who also raised the suspicion against the petitioner but on basis of what material is not known. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in Danapur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of 2 the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 379 and no case of similar nature which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)