J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0. IS2-/2011 (Arising out of W.P No- 3539/2005 dismissed for want of prosecution on dated 8/2/2011) ^^ ^-^^ *(&*.K»(W^kjt ^ <^r ^n^ ^" APPLICANT PETITIONER NONAPPLICANTS RESPONDENTS Anand Ku. Jain S/o Hukumchand Jain Aged about 47 years Occupation Clerk-cum-Cashier Posted atSBI Branch, Rajhara Dist- Durg (C.G) Versus ^x ....<:^':/ ^••^yx ^••'•y^' »w ^ \^.^" ^ ^ ^%?f <y J^"v 1) The Chairman, State Bank of India Mumbai, Maharashtra 2) Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Raipur Tehsil/Dist- Raipur 3) Disciplinary Authority cum Deputy General Manager,ZonaI Office, State Bank of India, Byron Bazar Raipur(C.G) 1.. ^- 4) The BranchManager State Bank of India Brahch Rajhara, Dist- Durg (C.G) APPLICATION FOR "RECALL OF ORDER DATCD 0/2/2011 RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION No- 3539/2005 J^ HIGH COUR'I' OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASFUR \ .APPLICANT PETmONER NON-APPLICANT8 RESPONDENTS M.C.C. No.l52of201l Anaod Ku. Jain. VERSUS The Cha.ii.-nian, Stat.e Bank of India: & Others. APPLICATION' FOR RES1DRATION OF WRIT PKm"IQN No. 3539/2005 SB:HonrbleSMSatishK,A5nihota^ Prcsent: Shri H.S.Ahluwalia, Ajdvocatc fbr the applicant. ORUER (ORAL) (Passed on 24th day of March, 2011) . 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsel for tlie applicant could not appear on account ofbonafide mistake, therefore, W.P. No. 3539/2005, v\7hich was dismissed on 08.02.2011, may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficiesit cause has been shown. W.P.No. 3539/2005 is restored to the original file. 3. A copy oftliis order be placed on record of original writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Asiiit