SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1580 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1580 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1580 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.732 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.732 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.732 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Taida Trading & Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.B.M.Chatterji with P.P.Bhosale for appellant. Mr.P.S.Tripathi for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 385 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support. The I.T.A.T. order is dated 16/7/2004 and the matter was referred to the concerned assessing officer on 8/12/2004. It was sent to the Ministry of Law on 1/4/2005. Draft appeal memo was received on 10/4/2006 and the appeal was filed on 24/4/2006. There is no explanation whatsoever for the delay between 1/4/2005 to 10/4/2006. In our opinion, the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)