IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1149 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 26/02/2001 in WA NO : 22945 OF 1998 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department. Secretariat, hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Mrs. Kalpana, 2 Neeta Shah 3 Varsha (Petitioners 1to 3 are rep. by their GPA holder as per Regd. GPA rep.By Susheel Kapadia). 4 The Vive- Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, 1-8-323 Paigah Plalace, Police Lines, Secunderabad. 5 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad, (Respondents 4% are formal parties to this appeal). .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.C.HANUMANTHA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No.1149 OF 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) Sri K.P.Vijaya Bhaskar, learned Counsel representing Sri C.Hanumantha Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners submits that no cause of action survives in the Writ Petition. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. In view of the same, no orders are required to be passed in the Writ Appeal. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. _______________________ T.MEENA KUMARI, J. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. Date: 01.09.2008 GS/ASP