FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. First Appeal No. 700 of 2004 (Bharat Hiraman Shobhane through L.Rs. Vs. The State of Mah. & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. N.M. Thengre, Adv. for the appellants. Mr. K.S. Dhote, A.G.P. for R-1. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 16 th June, 2008 Heard Shri Thengre, the learned counsel for the appellants, and Shri Dhote, the learned A.G.P., for respondent no.1-State. Shri Thengre, the learned counsel for the applicants, makes a statement that the legal heirs of the original appellant- Bharat Shobhane are not desirous of prosecuting the first appeal. It is further submitted on behalf of the appellants that the appellant no.2 has also died during the pendency of the first appeal. The appellants are permitted to withdraw the first appeal. First appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Cross Objection St. No. 31063/21004 In view of the dismissal of the first appeal, there is no reason to consider the cross objection filed on behalf of the respondent no.1- State. Same is, therefore, disposed of accordingly. The necessary Court fee be returned to the appellant as well as the respondent no.1, in accordance with the rules and procedure. JUDGE RMP