IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.33914 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 21, 2011 Khushabu & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Munish Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Earlier, the age proof of petitioner No.1 provided by way of voters card was found to be contrary to the pleadings. Now the counsel has relied upon ration card, which is again not an authentic proof of age of petitioner No.1. I am, thus, not convinced about the age of petitioner No.1. Dismissed at this stage. If petitioner No.1 has a valid proof of age, she may file a fresh petition by providing proper age proof. November 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE