S S — a IN ms H1 1 21 COUNT 0? aAIIUTLA AT BANIILORS NTED THIS 1113 18TH NY OF JUNE 1998 PR3SfT THE HON’BLE KR. RP.SKTHI, CHIflJUsTICE AND THE HON’ELE MR. JUSTICE LR.PMSAD 11*0 WtiIT PETiTION NO.27634/1991 K. L. Unnapa thy m o, 2/0 a.M.uundu 1o, No.57, 7th )pj 0pk4, Bangelore-54. . .PETITIOflR (By Sri s.K,V.Chelapaty, Advocete) AND:— I. Corporntion Qf the City ot ànnglore, represented by its coal sgione r. 2. k’s.Ul1s 3nterprises (H Ltd., Public Utility Building, K. s. Road, Bantlore, represented by its M.D. (By Sri LN.Puttegowda, for RI qnd D.N.Naniunda Reddy, for 112, Adv.) • -e S .. RESPQNWTS . .. 2 S , * C * I This wrtt petition is filed u/a 226 of the constitution of India praying to waash the reso lution at, 11,3,1991 vide Annexures-A & B and etc. This writ petition coming on for preliminany heaning, this day, Chief Justice made the following:— ORDER In this oublic interest litigation a prayer has been made for quashing of the resolution dated 11.3,1991 passed by the Town Planning and Development Standing Committee of the first respondent Corporation whereW, the 24th floor of the public Utility Building i’3 8tated to have been leased out to the 2nd respondent for a period & 3 years, Admittedly, the period of 3 years has elapsed and the petitioner has not taken any steps for the amendwent of the petition or to place on record any document to show that the aforesaid lease has been extended in favotw of respondent No.2, Aitu the lapse time, the petition has become infruotuous and it is accordingly dismissed, 2, The dismiss. of this petition would not prevent toe petitioner or y other person from filing a fresh p titiot if the lease of the premises mentioned in the cetition has been extended in favojjr of the 2nd respondent, / Sc 4) Th /J nn a r — mc I I c ‘/ ‘ ( -i- tiJ mvs/