1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3103 OF 2007 Shahnawaz Khan Ismail Khan v. Bachchan Singh Pishor Singh Sial _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr. K.P. Kanungo Advocate for the petitioner. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 17th JULY, 2007. Heard Mr.Kanungo, learned counsel for the petitioner. Order rejecting application for amendment to add State Government and District Government Pleader as party respondents in respect of a dispute of land between plaintiff and defendant is under challenge in this writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tahsildar had called opinion from the District Government Pleader and the Tahsildar passed the order based on the said opinion. The respondent is represented by the present District Government Pleader and the decision of Tahsildar has been influenced. He further 2 submits that the petitioner has filed an appeal before Sub Divisional Officer against the order of the Tahsildar and stay was granted but subsequently the said stay came to be vacated. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the petitioner has already taken remedies available to him under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and those proceedings are pending before the Revenue Authorities. Whatever allegations petitioner wants to make, as stated above, can definitely be made and proved by him before the said competent courts. However, amending the suit with the above nature of amendment is neither here nor there. There is no relevance whatsoever of the proposed amendment. In view of the above, I do not find any substance in the petition, which is dismissed. JUDGE /TA/