IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH APRIL 2011 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10916 of 2011(L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- KIRAN R. SEKHAR, S/O.C.V. RAJASEKHARAN, AGED 22 YEARS, 38/397, NEAR P & T QUARTERS, HINDUSTAN FOUNDORY LANE, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 10916 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 5th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper viz. EAE 601 (Engineering Economics and Principles of Management). He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 10 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp