BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR 10G.) Writ Petition is) No. 4% /2oo7 PETITIONER Saleem Lokdc, S/o Nikodin Lakdo, aged about 38 years, working as Assistant Teacher, Govt Primary School — ParaskoL Post Maldo (b) Sarangarh, R/o. Sarangarh, Tah. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiay, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION / ORDEROF LIKE NATURE ETC. RI W, P.($) No, 426 of 2007 Saleem Lakda Versus Pefifioner Respondenfs 53: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice 5a1'isl1 K. Agnihoi‘rii, J Mr. Harish Khu‘ria, Advocafe for The pefifioner. Mr. Arvind Dubeyl Panel Lawyer for fhe respandenfs/5fa1‘e. Present: O R D E R _ (Passed on fhis 23rd Day of January, 2007) 1. Learned caunsei appearing for The peTi‘HDner as we" as far 'l'he Sfafe/respondenfs joinHy submif fha‘r fhe fads of The presen'f wri‘l' pefi'Hon are similar 'fo fha‘l' of in W. P.(5) No. 4725/2006 (Amm‘ Sui Ram and a+hers Vs. Sfcd'e of Chha‘f'fisgarh & ofher‘s), which was disposed of vide order dafed 01.09.2006 (Annexure P/Z). They further submi? fhu‘t fhe question of iaw involved is also 'i’he same. 2. En View of fhe above—sfafed submissions made by learned counsel for fhe parfies, fhe wrifpe'ri’rion is disposed of in ferms of 'H1e order dai'ed 01.09.2006, passed by fhis Cour't’ in W. P.(5) No. 4725/2006 (Amar Sal Ram and o'fhers Vs. Sfafe of Chhaf'risgarh dz o‘lhers). No order as 1'0 cosfs. £ Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge 1 { Subbu “ah. am“ a; ”a Sdl- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sfafe of Chhaffisgarh and ano'fher