1 FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4181 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Smt. M. R. Jamdhade, Advocate for petitioner (Absent). Shri. Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for Union of India. CORAM: V.C. DAGA & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATED: 18th JULY 2009 P.C.: 1. None for the petitioner at even second call. The dismissal of the petition in default invariably results in moving motion for restoration application. It creates strain on the registry. It does not serve the interest of justice. 2. In the above circumstances, we went through the petition so as to consider and decide it on its own merit. 3. After having gone through the same, we find that the petitioner is claiming two reliefs. Firstly, he is seeking to get the selection list to be published, the interviews of which were conducted in the month of March 2007. Secondly, the petitioner is also claiming preference in consideration for the post of Chaukidar. He contended that his earlier service 2 should be taken in to account. 4. So far as the relief sought to be in respect of publication of selection list is concern, the petitioner has alternate remedy available. The petitioner can always seek information under the Right to Information Act. So far as the second relief is concerned, the same cannot be granted as there is no foundation. 5. In this view of the matter, we do not propose to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed in liminie with no order as to costs. [A.V. POTDAR, J.] [ V.C. DAGA, J.] ssc/wp4181.09