IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.5035 of 2010 KAMESHWAR PRASAD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 2/ 27/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. From Annexure-E to the show cause, the Court is satisfied that the order in C.W.J.C. No.8511/10 stands complied and there is no occasion to proceed further in the contempt jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the same the opposite parties have unilaterally relieved him violating the directions given by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.14544/09. He submits that he has filed the present contempt application for non-compliance of the order in both the writ petitions. The Patna High Court Rules do not permit filing of a composite contempt application for a cause of action arising in two different facts from two different writ petitions. The petitioner is himself aware of the same and therefore in the very opening page of the present contempt application states that he has preferred the present application for non-compliance of the order in C.W.J.C. No.8511/10. There is no occasion for the Court to consider 2 any non-compliance of C.W.J.C. No.14544/09. If the petitioner is of the opinion that the order in the latter writ petition has not been complied by the opposite parties and that they are flouting the same, his remedy lies in a separate contempt application against the latter order. The contempt application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)