THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.7969 of 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri Y.Balaji, the learned counsel for petitioners, and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Notice not taken out to the de facto complainant. 2. Petitioners herein are A-1 and A-2 in C.C.No.438 of 2008 on the file of the Court of XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, R.R. District. The offences alleged against them are punishable under Sections 448 and 506 IPC. They filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Code), for quashing the said case. 3. It may be noted that the de facto complainant is father of the first petitioner whereas the second petitioner is wife of the first petitioner. It appears that the de facto complainant married again after the death of his first wife i.e. the mother of the first petitioner and also begot a son through the second wife. These details are not necessary but they have been pointed out by the petitioners’ counsel to show that the criminal case is the result of the de facto complainant’s second wife against the petitioners and some property disputes. 4. The allegations in the charge sheet do disclose offences against the petitioners and this cannot be said to be a case where even if the said allegations are believed to be true no offences are made out. In view of this, the above family disputes mentioned by the petitioners’ counsel may constitute the defence of the petitioners. In the above circumstances, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for interference under Section 482 of the Code. Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed. 5. The second petitioner is stated to be a lady and it is represented that she has got her own problems in attending the trial court on every date of hearing in the case. Therefore, her presence alone is dispensed with for every date of hearing before the trial court and she can be represented by her counsel. The trial court shall however be at liberty to order her presence as and when it considers necessary. _______________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J 14th December 2011 CVRK