IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NO.2765 OF 2010. Date:08.04.2010 Between:- Fazal Ahmed Khan and others ..Petitioners/A-1 to A-3 And The State of A.P., represented by its Public Prosecotr, A.P.High Court, through P.S.Chaderghat, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents ORDER:- The accused Nos.1 to 3 are the petitioners herein. They are accused of offences under Sections 427, 323, 380, 457, 506, 509/34 I.P.C. The second responent is the defacto complainant. Crime No.323 of 2009 is pending against the petitioners in Chaderghat Police Station. A-2 and A-3 obtained anticipatory bail from the Sessions Court. 2. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that the second respondent himself gave a representation to the police stating that he gave false information to the police. 3. According to the petitioners, they have settled the matter amicably. Previously, Crl.P.No.1199 of 2010 was filed by the petitioners in this Court. When the said Criminal Petition came up for hearing, the petitioners’ counsel therein not pressed that petition and accordingly, it was dismissed as not pressed, by order dated 11.02.2010. Again, the petitioners filed this petition on 18.03.2010. This is nothing but abuse of process of law. The matter is still pending in crime stage with the police. On the alleged representation stated to have been given by the defacto complainant to the police, the police are yet to take a decision. Incase false information was furnished by the second respondent/defacto complainant, then, the police may even proceed against the second respondent for offence of giving false information to the police. The police did not yet file any final report/charge sheet in this crime. Therefore, the alleged settlement of disputes between the parties is yet to be considered by the police. At this stage, this Court does not find any reason to quash further proceedings in Crime No.323 of 2009. In case the police took final decision and filed final report/charge sheet before the Magistrate, then the petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court, in case they are aggrieved. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 8th April 2010 AMD