“*iii? F ”w k {a [ lN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BTLASPUR WRIT PETITIOMS) No. Toy) OF 2011 PETITIONER: /" Prashant Shrivastava, S/o— Shri Ratneshwari, Aged About-28 years R/o- Shivam Vihar, Khamtarai, Near Rama Green City, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS South Eastern Coalfield s Limited Through Chairman- Cum~ Managing Director, Sipat Road, Biiaspur (C.G.) Chief Generai Manager South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Korba Area, P.O. Korba Colliery, Distt. Korb (C.G.) i Deputy Chief Persona Manager, South Easter Coalfieids Ltd., Korba Area, P.O. Korba Coiliery, Distt. Korba (C.G.) @ a , a n @ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W AW HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.1059 OF 2011 PETITION ER Prashant Shrivastava Versus RESPONDENT South Eastern Coalfields Limited & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shailendra Shukla, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 24‘ day of February, 2011) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits the petitioner does not want press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities in respect of the grievances made herein i.e: employment against acquisition of his land. Thereupon, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that if a representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, as early as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri