1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1341 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1341 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri P. S. Pawar for Petitioner. He contends that earlier motion moved in the meeting on 30th June, 2010 was set aside on 21st August, 2010 and hence within six months a fresh requisition for holding no confidence meeting could not have been submitted. Learned A.G.P. appearing for Respondent No.10 points out that there was no valid meeting as the procedure followed for convening that meeting was itself found to be defective. 2. Provisions of section 35 (3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act stipulate a holding of meeting and then either not moving of a motion therein or then the failure of that motion as a bar to fresh motion. Here, it was found that meeting was not convened within seven days of the receipt of requisition and hence it was found vitiated. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1341 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. The bar, therefore, is not attracted. Petition rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:23/02/2011. ans/1341