<^-; <\0,Q'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. Chhattisgarh Grih Nirman Mandal (Known as Chhattisgarh HousingBoard) Shankar Nagar, RAIPUR (C.G.l VERSUS 0<S / 200^ PETITIONER DEFENDANT No.2 1) Dau Niranjan Lal Gupta : S/o.Late Shri Mannulal Gupta, Aged about 80 years, Freedom Fighter, President of Kasaridih, Civil Lines, DURG (C.G.) 2) State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the Collector, DURG (C.G.). 3) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, ^ Hpusing & Environment, TK.S. Bhavan, ^/^AIPUR. (C.G.) e^r^ t^^y ^ '^>sv RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFF DEFENDXNT No.1 DEFENDANT No.3 ^ ^ -l^ WRITPETmONUNDERARTICLE226&2270F ^ ^^ CONSTgTUTION OF INS5JA - ~^:5P! ^^^ XI-HC-78 ^cT -yi^l^, t?-alx-i<Ko, Rioi^yx HIHrtl ^TT^? ML^^./.6!......... ^200 3Tr^^T<mf^Tt<P ^TSTTOT^^T^W^ i ^ OT^5Tq^P(yit^q<&) ^TT^^Tf^TCT^^T 10.5.^005 <hi^i<^41^^i*i^T^^St ^^i^ ^arf^TW^^T Shri R. S. JayaswalJ leanied Sr. counsel wifh Shri Yogesh Paadey, leamed cou^isel for fhe petitioner. Shri Parag Kotech^, leanied coiuisel for the Respondent No.l. | Shri Paakaj Shrivasta|ya, learaed Panel Lawyer for fhe Respondent No.3, 1 Heaid. Learaed counsel for defendanf No.2 has filed Jie petitioner subm.its that the apphcations ie. appUcation under Order 6 Rule 17 ofl C.P.C. for amendment of fhe written stateraent, appUcatictn for production of docunients, aad fhe appUcation for notic^ The plamtiff filed his o|l on 2.7.2004. The contentiojt leamed Second Additional District Judge, Dui^ has| to produce fhe documents. 3Jection to fhe said appUcations 1 of fhe petitioner is ftiat fhe Mstricf Judge to fhe Court of passed fhe order rejectmg appUcations filed by the defe^idant No.2 under Order 6 Rule 17 of fhe Code of CivU Prc^cedure wifhout assignin.g any reasons. Learaed counsels for tit^e rcspondents submit fhat fhe applications filed by fhe defpndaat No,2 were belated. On perusal offhe docuinents aad^ fheorder passed by ftie Judge 4^oj^ I do not fmd any reason ^icludiag the appUcations are s^S.iaa-i X!-HC-78 THiTc5Ta»Tn^ v5^ci-yi<Lii^, y-cH^<i4, ^irti^y ^e\^^/°l. ... -KY - -^ --.»—----/----""--"" -"" ^200 3TI^5Tq^P (<icll'36(<s) 37r^§T^5Tf^Tt^ ^STT^^T^m^ ^RTrW^Tf^T^^ ~2-'1 y^v ^' ^" 4»i«(ri^"<^i*<riT<r'1^t^i^r? ^>9ri^T^?T rejected on fhe ground of| Imiitation as haviag been filed belatedly. Haviag considercd aU fhe facts the petition is aUowed, fhe order dated 12.7.2004 jpassed ia M.J.C. No. 4/2000 is set-aside, and fhe inatter is| reniaaded back to fhe Court of Additional Judge to fhe Co|urt of District Judge, Durg for decidiag fhe appUcations |on merits after recordiag fhe reasons for decision. It i^ inade clear ffaat the Judge concenied wiU consider fhe ^ppUcations ia accordance wifh law without beiag mfluenc^d by aay of fhe observations inade hereinabove. Certified copy as per R^iles. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge }