IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6166 of 2011 AJJET KUMAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 308 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. 30 Liters of spirit, 70 pouches containing 200 Ml. country made liquor, punching machine, polythene for preparing pouches, were recovered from the animal shade of the petitioner. The accusation against the petitioner is of preparing and selling illicit liquor illegally. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no equipment for preparation of liquor was recovered and illicit liquor can not be prepared only by punching machine. The supplementary affidavit has been filed that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It appears that seizure 2 was made on 18.04.2010 whereas the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned C.J.M.(West) Muzaffarpur on 24.04.2010 which somehow clouds the bonafide of accusation. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 78 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M.,(West),Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner gets involved in similar nature of offence. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)