1 caw1370.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 1370 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No. 3654 of 2010 Mr. Rajendra Shrimal Gugle & anr. ... Applicant v/s. Mr. Dadabhau Kondiba Dherange & anr. ... Respondents Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar i/b. Rahul Kadam for the applicant. Mr. Vishwanath Talkute for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- MARCH 24, 2011. P.C. This is an application for permission to place certain additional documents on record. 2. Shri Warunjikar, the learned Counsel submits that the documents which are sought to be placed on record are vital documents and since one of the document is the registered sale deed, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the said document is permitted to be placed on 2 caw1370.10.sxw record. 3. Shri Talkute, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents vehemently opposes the request. He submits that in the writ jurisdiction, this Court could not permit a fresh material to be produced for the perusal of this Court for the first time. 4. This Court sitting in an extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 has a very limited scope of interference. When it is not permissible for this Court to re-appreciate the evidence, it will not be in the interest of justice to permit the fresh evidence before this Court which the learned trial Court and the Appellate Court did not have an occasion to consider and that too on account of the lapses of the plaintiff. If permissible in law, the applicants can make an application before the learned trial Court which would be considered strictly in accordance with law. 5. Civil Application is, therefore, rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)