IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 296 of 2011 Date of decision : September 21, 2011 Ram Bahadur and anr. …Petitioners. Versus P.C. Kapoor and ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) New Principal Secretary (HP PWD), Sh. Ajay Mittal, though not a party to the present petition, is present. He says that he has taken over as Principal Secretary (HP PWD) very recently and that he will ensure that order is implemented in its totality within four weeks, but he submits that an observation may be made that other similarly situated persons shall not take benefit of the judgment, in question, nor shall they use implementation of the judgment, as a precedent. Four weeks’ time, as asked for by Sh. Ajay Mittal is granted. It is observed that the present order Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… shall not be used as a precedent on administrative side by other persons, situated, similarly as the present petitioners. 2. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. September 21, 2011 (Surjit Singh), J (pankaj)