:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1528 OF NO. 1528 OF NO. 1528 OF 1988 1988 1988 Nalaco Co. Ltd. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. Suchitra, A Firm & Anr. ... Defendants. Ms. K.C. Nichani for the Plaintiffs. Ms. Meeta Dagli for the Defendant No.2. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 13TH 13TH 13TH JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . On the last occasion Ms. Nichani, learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiffs had informed the Court that the sole proprietor of the First Defendant has expired and she would take instructions so as to proceed with the Suit by impleading the Heirs and Legal Representatives, if any, of this sole proprietor. 2. At her request, six weeks time was granted. Today when the matter has been placed before me, in all fairness she states that she has tried to contact the Plaintiffs but the packet has come back with the remark "Not Known". The Plaintiffs were directed on 4th March 2000 to file the affidavit in support of the Suit claim. However, it appears that the Plaintiffs have not taken any steps to comply with these directions nor it is instructing the Advocate to do so. :2: 3. In these circumstances, there is no alternative but to dismiss the Suit for want of prosecution. It is accordingly dismissed. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)