IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45096 of 2010 CHOTELAL YADAV, SON OF KUSHO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner remained absconding for a long period of time even while the other co-accused persons were put on trial and convicted, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case would not be bifurcated for commitment or fro framing of charge to take benefit of this order. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)