1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3259 OF 1994 Ramjan Kanha Tadavi, deceased by his heirs: 1 Nijam Ramjan Tadavi 2 Bijabai w/o Pathankha Tadvi, 3 Shabjanbai w/o Itabar, 4 Sajabai w/o Ramjan Tadavi, All R/o At & Post Lohare, Tq.Raver, District Jalgaon. Petitioners Versus 1 The State of Maharashtra; 2 The Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Bombay. 3 Madhukar Natthu Patil, At & Post Lohare, Taluka Raver, District Jalgaon. Respondents None for petitioners. Petition abated against Petitioners No.1 & 4 vide Additional Registrar’s order dated 03.03.2003. Mr. D.R.Kale, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.S.Bora, advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM: R.K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 30 th July, 2010. 2 ORAL JUDGMENT: 1 The Office note shows that notices were issued to the petitioners as the Counsel appearing for them had expired. The office note further shows that notices of petitioners no.1 and 4 returned unserved with the report of bailiff dated 17.01.2003, that petitioner no.1 had expired about 5 to 6 years ago, whereas, petitioner no.4 had died 2 to 3 years ago. Legal representatives of petitioners no.1 and 4 are not brought on record. Petition has, therefore, abated in respect of their claim. The other petitioners although served, none appears for them. 2 Shri Bora, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 submits that Respondent No.3 had also expired and he has also placed on record copy of death certificate of Respondent No.3. Petition, as such, abated as against Respondent No.3. 3 Hence the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (R.K.DESHPANDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp325994