V^-C^ ?5TT?n^T, yxfi^^is, fsj<7!>iy{< r. wiar gnte....-.^.Q..-..^.-...9.?a..(............^ 2^;; ^t?T'CT^F ( ^f^<yT) '^ ^n^^l^tisF wrsn^r if^sR s . ^l.. •'^ A; ^ ^' ^^?TW^rf^[3^ °ni<if<n<i1rt 'RTR^JT "^fft^ Tf^R^R '^'3TRFT3T^[ APPELLANT CLAIMANT RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS B^nthulal, S/o. Lallurain. Sahu, Ag M^ VERSUSl 1. ^d about 75 yrs., R/o. Village- u-ka, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG) ishnasen, S/o. Laxinan Nai, aged afcjout 28 yrs., Occupation-Driver, Ryfo. Village-Mulmula, Tah. Bemetara, Dijstt. Durg (CG) Si(irjeet Singh, Pro. Jeevan Bus S^rvice, In front of Oswal Petrol Pump, :Tftlibandha, Raipur (C.G.) Tv T: Ri 30.04.2007 Shri S.C.Verma, counsel for| le Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., irough Divisional Manager Division ffice No. 1, Kachahari Chowk Jail 3ad, Raipur(C.G.) the appellant. Heard on M.C.P. No. 1286/$006 application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal as the ap] 143 days as per office note dated '^ The reasons assigned for d^ ^lication has been filed with a delay of 1,04.2006. [ay in filing the appeal by the appellant is that the appellant was not aw^re of the fact that the appeal is to be filed within the stipulated period. The reasons mentioned in ^ is not sufficient and therefore the| he application for condonation of delay application for condonation of delay is i4 dismis rejected. Consequently, the appeal i^ dismissed as barred by limitation. Sd/- Dhirendra IVIishra Judge G^>^J^ FS/246—2/2007— 50.000.