1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10459 of 2011-F Decided on: 2.12.2011 Swaroop Chand Sharma .....Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh .....Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: “I. That the writ petition may very kindly be allowed and the salary, as ordered to be fixed vide Annexure P-2 and Annexure P-3 may kindly be declared void abinitio and same may kindly be set aside, in the interest of justice. II. That the respondents may very kindly be directed to pay the revised pay-scale, increments and other benefits from the date of initial appointment to 2 the petitioner, as is being paid to the similarly situated teachers, with all consequential benefits.” 2. The petitioner submits that he is similarly situated as the petitioners in the decision rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, titled Nek Ram and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.11.2009. It is further submitted that the decision has also been implemented. In case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioners in the judgment, referred to above, similar treatment shall be given to the petitioner herein also, after verifying the facts, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner before the respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 2, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (hl) Judge.