In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM.M-24446 of 2009 Decided on Sept 24,2009. Santosh Rani and others -- Petitioners vs. State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.S.P.S. Sidhu,Advocate,for the petitioners Mr.R.S. Rawat, AAG, Punjab. Mr.P.P.S. Duggal, Advocate for the complainant. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) On 2.9.2009, notice of motion was issued and at that time, a statement was made by counsel for the petitioner that “he further submits that the petitioners are ready for the cancellation of the transfer deed.” Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions received from one of the petitioners', namely, Naresh Kumar, who is present in Court states that the petitioners are not ready and willing for the cancellation of transfer deed. The petitioner cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate in Court for the purpose of taking order of bail. In my view, this is a fraud played upon the Court, which has to be condemned in view of the decision of the Supreme Court reported as S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by L.R.s. Vs. Jagannath (dead) by L.Rs. And others AIR 1994 Supreme Court 853. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the petition and the same is hereby dismissed. Sept 24,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge