IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 18322 of 2004 Between: Kishanlal, S/o. M. Balaji, R/o.H.No. 13-3-652/9/5 Puranapul, Jiyaguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, at Collectorate, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not sending report to the 1st respondent in respect of land admeasuring Ac.3-00 gts in Sy.No.156/3, situated at Mailardevpalli Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District as illegal, unconstitutional, inter alia violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to send the report to the 1st respondent in respect of land admeasuring Acres 3-00 gts. in Sy.No. 156/3 situated at Mailardevpalli Village Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District within a time frame. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.K.RAMAKANTH REDDY Counsel for Respondents : G.P. FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for respondents and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition finally at the stage of admission. The petitioner claims to be inherited the properties of late K.Agamma W/o late Ramchander who was the pattedar and possessor of the property in question. It is stated that some third party names have been incorporated in the revenue records by deleting the names of original owners in respect of the property bearing Survey No.156/3 admeasuring Ac.3-00 situated at Mailardevpally village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed revision before the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy district and as there was no response, petitioner filed W.P.No.11758 of 2004. This Court by its order dated 9.7.2004 disposed of the said writ petition directing the Joint Collector to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner. The petitioner now states that pursuant to the said order of this Court, first respondent wrote a letter dated 13.8.2004 directing the second respondent to send the report in respect of the property in question for taking further action in the matter, but the second respondent so far has not sent any report. Therefore, petitioner seeks direction to the second respondent to send the report. Virtually, by invoking the jurisdiction of this Court, petitioner seeks execution of the orders passed by the Joint Collector. This Court cannot monitor the proceedings which are pending before the Joint Collector. If this type of writ petitions is entertained, virtually it amounts to opening the floodgates and in the process, it will be difficult to cope up with such type of writ petitions. If the Joint Collector did not comply with the earlier orders passed by this Court, the petitioner is not remediless. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. No costs. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 8.10.2004 DA To 1 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, at Collectorate, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District. 3 Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 Two CD copies.