IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 6297 of 2003 Between: Y.Lakshmi Archana d/o Y.Venkateswarlu D.No.25-11-24, 3rd Line.,Telegapalem, Ponnur - 522124., Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Government of A.P., represented by Principal Secretary., H.M. & F.W. Dept., A.P.Secretariat., Hyderabad. 2. The State Council of Higher Education, represented by its Convenor, Engineering, Technology and Pharmacy Admissions, 2002. 3. Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur District, represented by its Principal. 4 Viswabharathi College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Perecherla., Guntur District, represemted by its principal 5 N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, represented by its Registrar .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 4th respondent in detaining the original Certificates of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the 2nd and 4th respondents to return the original Certificates of the Petitioner submitted at the time of Counseling to enable her to submit the same to the 3rd respondent and to pass such other order or further orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.G.K.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE Counsel for Respondents 3 & 4 : None appeared Counsel for Respondent No.5 : Smt. Y. Padmavathi, standing counsel The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Ravikanth, Advocate, representing Sri K.G.K. Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Therefore, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI,J) Date: 02.12.2004 Ksn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. Principal Secretary., H.M. & F.W. Department, Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad, 2. The Convenor, State Council of Higher Education, Engineering, Technology and Pharmacy Admissions, 2002. 3. Principal Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur District 4 Principal, Viswabharathi College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Perecherla., Guntur. 5 The Registrar, N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada. 6. Two C. Cs to G.P. for Medical, Health & Family Welfare, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 7. Two CD copies