IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 LA.App..No. 736 of 2007(D) -------------------------- LAR.48/2002 of ADDL.SUB COURT,PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT -------------- STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANTS ----------------- 1. KANNAMMAL, W/O SUBRAMANIAN, EDATHALPARAMBIL, THOTTAKKATTUKARA. 2. KUMAR, EDATHALAPARAMBIL, THOTTAKKATTUKARA. 3. MURUKAN, S/O SUBRAMANIAN, EDATHALPARAMBIL, THOTTAKKATTUKARA. 4. SOBHA, D/O SUBRAMANIAN, EDATHALAPARAMBIL, THOTTAKKATTUKARA. 5. INDIRA, D/O SUBRAMANIAN, EDATHALAPARAMBIL, THOTTAKKATTUKARA. 6. SELVI, D/O SUBRAMANIAN, EDATHALAPARAMBIL, THOTTAKKATTUKARA. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- L.A.A.No.736 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st January, 2008. J U D G M E N T The State is challenging the enhancement awarded in L.A.R.No.48/2002, on the file of the Additional Sub Court, North Paravur. The learned Sub Judge relying on a judgment of that court rendered in L.A.R.No.182/2001 awarded enhancement. Challenging the judgment passed in L.A.R.No.182/2001, the State has filed L.A.A.No.854/2006, which was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on 23.10.2005. Further, the enhancement awarded in this case is reasonable. Therefore, I do not find any reason to admit this appeal and keep it pending. The appeal is only to be dismissed. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- No. J U D G M E N T Dated: December, 2007. -------------------------------