IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR (C.G.) [.C.C.NO. 72005 l^ APPLICANT/APPELLANT ^-? / Sadacam, s/o Sukhrani, aged about 82 years, resident of village Lailuiiga, Tah. Gharghoda, Distnct Raigarh (C.G.) Vs. NON-APPLICANTS/RESPONDBNTS: ^l) Tikeshwar, s/o Raghunath Kotla. /^y^ ^]^7^J y:' ? j^r °w^ /L>y ./ <>*' ! •''^' / A. ,' .<«>"• .^ ^~ /2) Munu, s/o Raghunath Kotla. i^. 3) Giridhari, s/o Raghunath Kotla. g.j}-) Babulal, s/o Raghuaath Kotla. "p^5) Mobarsi, wd/o Raghunath 'y ,a- Clv -<. ^' Kofki. AU the residents ofviUage Lailuaga, Tah, Gharghoda, District Ra^arh (C.G.) o v K^r::. 'sv-^~ :.-, APPLICATION FOR RESTOR&TION OF SECOND APPEAL N0.249/1988 XI-HC-78 an^r^iTl^riq; traTa:iR7rshii<t) w _DJ.-f.' 35T '<<l<<lc1<l, tSTn<l'ls, RldKHy . ^.C.C.^0.73/^&Gr~ HTHC^TSbmch ^r 200 \ 3T1^?T IR^ (yiI^s|(^iT) ??grw trfgcT STI^T Advdcate Shri B.D. Guru, counsel fc ShriAwadh Tripathi, Heard. This is an application for| vfhich was dismissed by this Coi| Learned counsei for the] bearing S.A.No. 249/1988 v/as dismissed for non-prosecution. il to its original number. The ap| supported by an affidavit ofthe a] Having considered the f£| on record and in view of the ded of Raflq and another vs. ?»1u| vv'herein it has been held that tH or error of the counsel, the No.249/1988 is restored to its ori| Copy ofthis order be pi Certified copy as per rules| Irestoration of Second Appeal No. 249/1988, liton 22-1-2003. appiicant submits that the second appea! i^ken up for hearing on 22-1-2003 and it was 'tfie prays for restoration or the Second Appeal [^lication for restoration of Second Appeal is ^rafefr.Tw^ft'ffto^-ttezrc ^arf^R-an^T r the appiicants for the respondents No. 2 to 4. cts and circumstances of the case, materisl ;ision of Supreme Court rendered in the case pshslat and another (AIR 1981 SG 1400) e party should not suffer because of mistake MCC is aiiowed. The Second Appeal ginai number. ?d. in Second Appea! No. 249/1988. Sd/- ' : Fakhruddin Judge ^