1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3576 /2009 [ Manoj Suresh Kadu vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr V D Awachat Adv. for applicant Mr A.A.Gupta,Adv.for R-3 and 4 Mr Jaltare Adv.for 2,5,6,7 and 8 Mr K S Dhote for Respondent State .......... CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : JANUARY 22, 2010. Heard. 2. By this application, the applicant prays for cancellation of bail granted in favour of Respondent nos. 2 to 8 by learned 4h Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 423/2009. According to learned Advocate for the applicant, the offence was serious and, therefore, bail ought not to have been granted in the first place. Secondly, he submitted that there are attempts to tamper with the evidence. If that is so, how the attempts are made to tamper with the evidence of the present applicant can very well be brought to the notice of the trial Judge on the basis of affidavit or in the course of evidence in the trial. 3. Learned Advocate representing the respondents as also learned APP states that trial is in progress and a total of 10 witnesses have been examined. The 2 applicant is also in the witness box at present. If that is so, the applicant can bring all the reasons pleaded for cancellation of bail to the notice of learned trial Judge and if it is so essential learned trial Judge can certainly exercise powers u/s 439(2) in order to cancel the bail. 4. With the above observations, application is disposed of. JUDGE sahare