BA1 No. 350 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned G.A. for the State. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the first information report as well as the post mortem report, it is clear that the applicants prima-facie were trying to hide the death of their daughter-in- law. The presence of rigor mortis all over the body indicates that the death had occurred much prior to the date of the alleged incident. Without commenting anything further on the merit of the case, the court is of the opinion that the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail at this stage. The bail application is rejected. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 18.05.2011 Shiv