c^pv-p 77^6'J HIGH COURT OF CMHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.fPR)4257 of 2009 PETITIONER: Raju S/o Late Dhan Sai, aged about 18 years, R/o Village Paraghat P.S. Masturi DistrictBilaspur(C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Khikhwa @ Antram S/o Nankuram aged about50years 2. BholiS/o AntRam aged about 23 years, 3. Rakesh S/oAntram aged about 16 years 4. Basant S/o Punnilal aged about18 years 5. Durga Prasad S/o Rangi Lal aged about 26 years, 6. Vinay Kumar S/o Punnilal Aged about 27 years 7, Pynnilal S/o Jhuru, aged about35years 8. Rangilal S/o Mukut aged about 5T years All are by Caste Satnami (S.C.) and Resjdents pf Vjllage Paraghat, P.S. Masturi, DistrictBilaspur(C.G.) 9. iState of Chhattisgarh through P.S. Mastun District Bilaspur (C.G.) {Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for restoration of Criminal Revision No.376/2003} Present: Mr. Manoj Mishra, counselfoi the petitioner. DivjsionBench: - Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma & Hon'ble Mr. R.L. Jhanwar. JJ ORAL ORDER (1-12-2010) T.P.Sharma.J: - 1. Heard learned counsel forthe petitioner. 2; This is petition for restoration of Criminal Revision No.376/2003 dismissed forwant of prosecution vide order dated 1-7-2009. liM SB ai • III• g • •a •fi• « ii K B K!il ^!f^-^^^ ^•^ ;f^.-^&- 'i.l^SS <w-%g^,^^':" Soma 3. By filing this petitipn under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. the petitioner has prayed for restoration of Criminal Revision No.376/2003 and has specifically taken the ground thatarguing counsel Mr. Manoj Mishra was ill and was not in a position torepresent the petitioner. 4. On due consideration of the grounds mentioned in the petition for restoration, we are satisfied that the petitioner has been able to explain the cause of non-appearance of the petitioner when thecriminal revision was called out for hearing. 5. Consequently, the petition is allowed andCriminal Revision No.376/2003 dismjssed for want of prosecution is hereby restored to its original number. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge 'i; !?.',•