IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 6141 of 2008(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SUHARABI, W/O.KUNJUMUHAMMED HAJI, TIROORANGADI TALUK, TIROORANGADI VILLAGE, THRIKKULAMSOM DESOM, PANTHARANGADI P.O.-676 306. BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIROORANGADI POLICE STATION, TIROORANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIROORANGADI POLICE STATION, TIROORANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. KARUTHON SUBAIR, TIROORANGADI TALUK, TIROORANGADI VILLAGE, THRIKKULAMSOM DESOM, PANTHARANGADI P.O.-676 306. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN G.P.SRI.P.A. SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.6141/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS.NO.138/06 OF THE SUB COURT, TIRUR. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED B ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER ON 6..2.08. EXT.P3 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ON 13.2.2008. /TRUE COPY/ cl K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N. RAVINDRAN, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.6141 OF 2008-F -------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2008. JUDGMENT There is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent concerning a pathway. The petitioner and her husband have filed Ext.P1 civil suit against the 3rd respondent and his wife. According to the petitioner, when the suit was pending before the civil court, the defendants damaged the petitioner's gate and the compound wall. Therefore, she filed Ext.P3 representation before the police. Instead of taking action based on Ext.P3 complaint, the police is compelling the petitioner to execute certain documents in favour of the 3rd respondent. Feeling aggrieved by the said harassment, this writ petition is filed. 2. The 3rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit contending that all the allegations against him are unfounded. The petitioner's husband obstructed the pathway used by the 3rd respondent and his wife. The petitioner's people have assaulted the wife of the said respondent. Therefore, she has filed a complaint before the police against petitioner's husband and others. WPC.NO.6141/08 . 2 3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that upon receipt of a complaint from the 3rd respondent's wife, the petitioner's husband was summoned to the police station to enquire into the complaint. The allegation of harassment etc is denied by the learned Government Pleader. The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that the petitioner's husband is abroad and therefore, allegation against him is unfounded. We record the submission of the police that they have no intention to interfere in the civil suit or compel the petitioner to execute any document in favour of the 3rd respondent or his wife. The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. cl WPC.NO.6141/08 . 3