Singla Bench K. § (;/?’/6 2/ @/ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. Héw /2006 PETITIONER Shri Ram Avtar Shanna Aged about 65 years, S/o. Late Shn' Pryagdatt Sharma, * R/o. Village Padwapara, Kargi Road Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Q§ie§e§® l. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, K Through: Secretaly, Pension 8a Account Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Accountant Generaly Accunt 85 Pension Departent, Raipur (C.G.). The District Malariya . Officer, District Dur (C.G.). i .’ The Collector, Distrct Durg (C.G.). The Distict Mariya Officer Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). The Collector, District< Bilaspur (C.G.). Blk Medical Officer, Kota District Bilaspur (C.G.). District Aount Officer” District Bilaspur (C.G.). / w o m v g r la w oc f cc ; @ C é ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR / ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS ORDER/ORDERS DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY WT F LIKE NATRE ET OTHER RI O U C XI-HC-78 x Qx Wm<W> Wm WWW W 20wé maam mmm mamfaam WW§WW ’%€3T%W&1%ST 31-8-2006 Mr. Ashok Soni, counsel for the pe‘rifioner. Mr. Vinny Pandey, Panel Lawyer for fhe 5Tafe/respondenfs No.1 and 3 ‘l'o 8, on advance copy‘ Mrs. BR. Many, Advoca'l'e Govt CounseL for respondenf Na: Heard. The case of fhe pefifioner' Inspecfar- while serving a? Bilasp has been sef‘Hed and even fhe regarding paymenf of GPF is no? being passed by fhe respondent‘s. Learned counsel for The pefifioner submifs ‘rha‘r fherefore, The pefifioner may be ailowed fo make a represenfaiian fo respondeni's No.2, 3 & 5 decide The case of The peTiTioner regarding :ehTaTion To which learned counsel appearing 1'ion. sel for The parTies and having regard To The ease, The peTiTioner is allowed To make a‘ l a copy of This peTiTion and iTs annexures To :ifTeen days from Today, in Turn respondenT resenfaTion and forward The case of fhe of GPF To respondenT No.2 and similarly respondenf No.5 shail also forward The case of The peTiTioner regarding en‘i‘iflemenf of GPF 1'0 responder receipT of The represenTaTion, anc appears on behalf of Mr. S.K. Beriwal, CenTral 2, on advance copy. and in Turn, fhey be direc'red 1‘0 GPF affer considering fhe r-epr'e: for fhe respondents have no objec Having heard learned coun facfs and circums‘iances of fhe defailed represenfafion along wi'ri respondents No.2, 3 & 5 wifhin 1 No.3 shall enquire info The rep pefii‘ioner regarding eni-iflemen‘r los . 1T No.2 wiThin one monfh from The daTe of ulTimaTely, respondenT No.2 shall decide The P.T.O. is ThaT he reTired from The posT of Malariya Jr on 31-7-2002 and ThereafTer, his pension graTuiTy has been paid, buT his final order XI-HC—78 § 7) w 21mm, Wm, WW trma‘ramim ~'CO ‘?46.71 . 2006 H1 W W5 (W) m amW W WWW &‘W WK amWm marm 311w ~'L L ‘ §7mm \ \ case of fhe pe'm‘ioner and pass inal payment order- regarding fhe enfi‘rlemenf \ ~’ of 6PF of fhe pe‘fifioner wifhin 1' o mon'rhs Thereaf‘rer. Wifh The direc‘rion aforesaid, fhe pe‘mion sfands disposed of. Parfies are enfifled for ce “rified copy of fhis order. Sd/— e L.C. Bhadoo Judge 50mg ? \ k \. ’ P.T.O.