IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 15262 of 2009 Between: 1 Sri Marella Pulla Reddy, S/o.M. Satyanarayana Reddy, R/o. H.No. 2-39, Chitla Village, Vatsaval Mandal, Krishna District. 2 Budati Shekar Reddy, S/o. B. Malla Reddy, R/o. 382, Alwyn Colony, Miyapur, Hyderabad. 3 Sri A. Krishna Reddy, S/o. A. Ammi Reddy, R/O. H.NO. 4-51/L/89, Lumbini SLN Springs, Opp: Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-32. PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate, Lakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Tahsildar, Rajendernagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Smt. Ravi Rama, W/o. Late R.V. Subba Rao, R/o. Munsifvari Street, Parala Cherala, Guntur District. 6 Vejendla Ramesh Babu, S/o. Ramakrishnayya, R/o. 7-1-32, Leela Nagar, Rohini Apartments, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of "WRIT OF CERTIORARI", call for the record pertaining to the impugned proceedings vide Proc. No. L/1530/2007 dated 09-08- 2007 and Proceedings No. L/1531/2007 dated 09-08-2007 on the file of the Respondent No. 3 and quash the same by declaring that the Proceedings is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of provisions of A.P. (T.A.) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 and in violation of Article 14 and 300(A) of Constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.V.PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15262 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, with permission to file appeal before the appellate authority. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedies as available to them under law. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 11.8.2009 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15262 of 2009 11.8.2009