THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 182 of 2001 Between: T. Raj Kumar ….. Petitioner and Kukatpally Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner & others ….. Respondents O R D E R: This Writ Petition has been instituted seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent – Kukatpally Municipality in allowing the illegal constructions being made by Respondents 2 to 4 as bad in law and also for a consequential direction to the 1st respondent – Kukatpally Municipality to take steps in accordance with law to stop illegal constructions being made by Respondents 2 to 4. Time was granted repeatedly by the registry for furnishing the correct addresses of Respondents 2 to 4. The cause title as furnished was so incomplete that it does not provide for any proper service on them. By an order dated 23rd April 2009, this Court gave time finally for two weeks for payment of batta with petition and correct address failing which the Writ Petition to be dismissed as against Respondents 2 to 4. In view of the default order imposed on 23rd April 2009, the registry has struck off the names of Respondents 2, 3 and 4 from the array of parties on 23rd June 2009. As is noted supra, if the relief as prayed for is granted, it is Respondents 2, 3 and 4, who will be adversely and badly affected. It is, therefore, elementary that Respondents 2, 3 and 4 are needed to be put on notice before any such relief as prayed for can be granted. No such relief can be granted behind their back. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for not properly prosecuting the same. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 9th February 2010 ksld