c^- ^o^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ('svNO. ^'?c5/D//2eoer WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER_S ...-^ F..<-^"'-. QN\?.-1^^" ..•••"' -y^y ...••<^^"' '".•^" ..-•" >^ ^ .0'd^ ^^.^ <s^ ^WMW/^ ^/- y 1. Dashrath Ram Nag, aged about 34 years, son of Shri Bvhausaram Nag, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School, Samdura, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (sl.no. 14 of Anne P-1 dt. 20.10.93) 2. Hulas Ram Banjare, aged about 36 years, son of Dilip Ram Banjare, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School Sikhardand, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (SL.NO. 02 Of P-1, dt. 31.12.93) 3. Smt. Damyanti Ekka, aged about 38 years, wife of Alvis Ekka, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Girsl Ashram Bagicha, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (sl.no.38 of Annexure P-1 dt. 30.11.94) 4. Smt. Ursela Toppo, aged about 35 years, daughter RESPONDENTS of Shri Johan Ekka, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Purani Basti, Pathalgaon Distt^, Jashpur (CG) ^ S-N • (W_ VERSUS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 't HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIb^SPW W. P.(S) No. 990 of 2007 Petitioners ; Oadirath Ram Nag ond others Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and another SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the S-tate/respondents. OR &ER (Passed on -this 21st t)ay of February, 2007) 1. The petitioners were appointed in the year 1992 as Assistant Teachers on fixed pay scale of Rs. 1200/-. After completion of their probation, they were granted regular pay scale. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits thut the issue involved in the ease is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein vws considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabatpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (AAadhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regutar poy scale w.e.f. -the date of initial appointment. The matter was taten up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The cppeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the deciston ^ of the Tribynal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners further submits that this Court, whiie considering the same isaie in Rakesh Kumar Sharma <& another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh <& others (W.P. (S) No. 5473 of 2006) by order dated 09-10-2006, has granted regutar pay scale w.s.f. the date of initial oppointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Rakesh Kumar Sharma & another Vs. State of Chhatt-isgarh & others (Supra). 6. In view of that this petition is disposed of in the same terms.No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Yogesh