IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 375 of 2008 Ashok Kakkar & others. ......... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ........ Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner nos. 1 & 2 before the court concerned on 08.10.2008 whereas petitioner nos. 3 & 4 have not been chargesheeted as no prima facie case is made out against them. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, Interim order dated 21.05.2008 passed by this Court stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 15.12.2008 V.K