IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 12TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3107 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.315/2004 of ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE (ADHOC-II), Ernakulam CC.835/2000 of ADDL.CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ BIJU K.J., KARIMPINKALAYIL HOUSE, RAJAKADU P.O. IDUKKI DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. P.J. SAMSON, PAKIDATHITTAYIL HOUSE, PONNURUNNI, VYITTIL, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP FOR R2 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAVEENDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 3-09-2008 , THE COURT ON 03/09/2008 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 3107 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 03-09-2008 ORDER The accused in C.C. No. 835 of 2000 on the file of the Addl.Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 9325 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 3rd day of September 2008. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.