1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLN NO.: 4928 OF 2005 IN CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 4103 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3736 OF 1999 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 3736 OF 1999 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 3748 OF 1999 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLN NO.: 4928 OF 2005 IN CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 4103 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3736 OF 1999 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 3736 OF 1999 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 3748 OF 1999 *** 1. Writ Petition No.3748 of 1999 is not on board but Advocate Mr. Gugle with Advocate Mr. Garud and Advocate Mr. Kiran Nagarkar and Shri Joshi states that parties are same and controversy is also same. The Respondent Nos.1, 2, 7 and 8 have produced before this Court a photo-stat copy of compromise deed and stated that they have received possession of tenanted premises from respective petitioner. According to Advocate Mr. Nagarkar, therefore, the controversy in the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLN NO.: 4928 OF 2005 IN CIVIL APPLN. NO.: 4103 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 3736 OF 1999 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 3736 OF 1999 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 3748 OF 1999 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. petition is rendered infructuous. Shri Gugle states that if the Respondents have received possession and the decree is fully satisfied the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous as such. 2. In view of the statement made by Advocate Mr. Nagarkar and acceptance that decree is fully satisfied, the petitions are rendered infructuous and the same are accordingly disposed of as such. Rule discharged. No costs. Civil Application No. 4928 of 2005 also disposed of. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:22/03/2011. ans/4928