$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2435/1996 PURSHOTTAM LAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. G.S. Gangwar, Advocate versus HARBANS SINGH & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjay Sawhney, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 19.02.2018 I.A.7962/2017 1. Defendant No.2, who is mother of plaintiff, has expired. Since as per the compromise decree dated 15.02.2006 the defendant No.2/mother did not have any right in the suit property, accordingly, the defendant No.2 is deleted from the array of the defendants in the suit. 2. Plaintiff has also expired after passing of the decree on 15.02.2006. Counsel for the plaintiff wishes to bring on record legal heirs of deceased plaintiff. Counsel for the defendants does not dispute that the legal heirs of plaintiff are those as mentioned in para (4) of the application which is not listed before Court and as filed by the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff. There is no need of listing the application in the court as it is agreed by the parties that the plaintiff will file amended memo of parties showing the legal heirs of plaintiff in place of the plaintiff as stated in the aforesaid para (4) of the proposed application. Legal heirs of plaintiff are brought on record. 3. Registry will now draw up a final decree on payment of non-judicial stamp duty by the parties in terms of Section 2 (15) of the Stamp Act, 1899 read with Article 45 thereof. 4. IA stands disposed of. CS(OS) 2435/1996 5. In order to put finality of the valuation of the further purpose of fixing the stamp duty, let the valuation be fixed in terms of the order to be passed by the Joint Registrar, and for this purpose list before the Joint Registrar on 17th April, 2018. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J FEBRUARY 19, 2018 ns