FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.526 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr Nitin Mulye, for the petitioner. Mr S.U.Kamdar with Ms A Bardla i/b M/s Thakore Jariwala & Associate for respondent no.1. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. DATED: 11.02.2008 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. This petition is directed against an order dated 27.11.2007, by which the petitioner’s application at Exhibit-48 for adding defendant nos. 10 to 14 in the suit has been rejected on the ground that they are not at all necessary parties in the suit. I perused the application so also the order. In my opinion, the impugned order does not warrant interference by this court in its writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition is rejected. At this stage, Mr.Mulye, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that liberty may be given to the petitioner to examine the concerned revenue officer as witness in the proceedings. It is always open for the petitioner to make such an application before the trial Court. If such an application is made by the petitioner same may be considered in accordance with law. While making this observation I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the petitioner’s contention in that regard. All contentions are kept open. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)