WP(C) 3350/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The matter relates to appointment of Anganwadi Worker for which the peti tioner was an aspirant. The Anganwadi centre is Hadpara Budrukuchi Anganwadi Cen tre. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 being not a resident of t he area of the said centre, she could not have been selected and appointed. Ano ther ground urged by the petitioner is that the respondent No. 4 is not qualifie d to hold the assignment of Anganwadi Worker. I have heard Mr. S.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. P.K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4. I have als o heard Mr. B.K. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, SWD. So far as the first grievance is concerned, same is governed by the jud gment of this Court reported in 2011 (3) GLT 334 (Chitrawati Patgiri & ors. vs. State of Assam and ors.). By the said judgment disposing a series of writ petiti ons, it was directed to the Director of Social Welfare, Assam to make an enquiry relating to the residential status of the selected candidates. Accordingly, the first grievance of the petitioner raised in this writ petition is answered in t erms of the said judgment. The Director of Social Welfare shall make necessary e nquiry to the residential status of the parties. As regards the second grievance of the petitioner that the respondent No . 4 being not qualified to hold the assignment of Anganwadi Worker, same shall a lso be looked into by the Director of Social Welfare. If need be, he will provid e personal hearing to both the parties. In any case, no adverse order shall be p assed against the respondent No. 4 without giving an opportunity of being heard. The entire exercise shall be carried out as expeditiously as possible, b ut any rate, not later than 15.09.2011.