IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46616 of 2009 HRIDAY RAI, SON OF LATE NANDAN RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.2.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is said to have injured the informant whereas the allegation of causing the death of Akhilesh Rai is upon co- accused Sohan Roy, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 13.11.2009 and there is counter version with the same occurrence, be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-F.T.C., Vaishali at Hajipur in Raghopur P.S. Case No.93 of 2002, subject to the condition (A) That one the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner (B) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other - 2 - N.H./ case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (C) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. ( Anjana Prakash,J.)