( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.633 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.633 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.633 OF 2008 IN IN IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2008 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2008 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.76 OF 2008 Severien Franklin Baretto .. Applicant. Versus 1. Franklin Francis Baretto 2. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.P.G.Badole for the applicant. Mr.J.G.Bhanushali with Mr.Karan Mehta for respondent No.1. Ms.Alpa Jhaveri, A.P.P. for respondent No.2-State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 2nd June, 2008. DATED : 2nd June, 2008. DATED : 2nd June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.P.G.Badole for the applicant, Mr.Bhanushali for respondent No.1 and Ms.Jhaveri for respondent No.2 - State. 2. By an order dated 4.2.2008, the respondent No.1 was granted anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai in Anticipatory Bail Application No.76 of 2008. By this application, the ( 2 ) applicant wants that the said order should be cancelled. Mr.Bhanushali, learned Advocate for respondent No.1 has filed affidavit in reply. The same is taken on record. 3. Upon instructions, Mr.Bhanushali informed the Court that the respondent No.1 was arrested on 5.2.2008 and has been released on bail in terms of order dated 11.2.2008. 4. In view of the development, namely, the arrest of the respondent No.1 and his release pursuant to the order dated 11.2.2008, there is no question of cancellation of grant of order dated 11.2.2008. As the said order has been implemented, nothing survives in this application. Hence the application is rejected. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)