FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 131 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3798 OF 1996. Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's Orders COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS 1 Mr. U.R. Aute, Advocate holding for Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for respondent No.6 --- CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S .V. GANGAPURWALA,JJ. DATE : 10TH AUGUST, 2010 1] This is an application for review of the order dated 23/11/2006, vide which the petition came to be dismissed. 2] From the perusal of the order under review, it appears that though the order impugned was passed by the Scrutiny Committee without the matter being referred to the Vigilance Cell, this court has dismissed the petition. 3] This Court, relying on the judgment of the Ape court in the matter of “ Ku.Madhuri Patil Vs. Additional Commissioner” reported in AIR 1995 SC 94, has held that an enquiry by the Vigilance Cell is necessary and as such, various matters have been remanded for decision of the committee. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 131 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3798 OF 1996. Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's Orders COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS 2 4] In that view of the matter, the petitioner has made out a case for review of the order under review. Review application is, therefore, allowed. The order dated 23/11/2006 is recalled. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.] [B.R.GAVAI,J.] grt/-