// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9441/2008 Meva Ram S/o Shri Kana Ram and Others Versus State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 08.09.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Pt. Giriraj Bardhar and Shri Mohan Choudhary, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners have made the following prayer in the writ petition:- “(i) the respondents may kindly be directed to allot/issue patta as they are residing since last 17 years upon Khasra No.60, 62, 58/245 of village Badpadampura (Santoshpura) Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur; (ii) the respondents may kindly be directed not to disturb from the aforesaid land in dispute and regularized the petitioner; (iii) Any other appropriate order which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioner.” The contention of the learned counsel // 2 // for the petitioners is that they are in possession of the land in dispute and they are being dispossessed by the respondents. He further submits that the respondents be directed to regularize their land and to issue 'patta' in respect of land, which is in their possession. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners. So far as the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are being dispossessed by the respondents is concerned, there is no material on the record to show that any notice has been given to them for their dispossession. There is no material on the record to show the possession of the petitioners also. The proper course for the petitioners is to move proper representation before the competent authority for regularization of their land in case they are in possession and only after verification of the possession of the petitioners the competent authority will pass necessary order for their regularization in accordance with law. In absence of any material on the record, the directions cannot be issued to the respondents, as prayed for, in the writ petition. In view of the above, there is no merit // 3 // in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//