IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTH THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11034 OF 2006 Between: Srikakulam Municipality rep. by its Commissioner, Srikakulam and another ..... PETITIONERS AND District Forum, constituted under the Consumer Protection Act,1986 at Srikakulam, rep. by its President and another .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No .11034 OF 2006 ORDER: (per Ghulam Mohammed, J) When the matter was called on 03.08.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Yesterday, when the matter was called, there was no representation and on our own we have adjourned to today, but still there is no representation. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J _______________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J 23.09.2009 Stp