hcs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.9022 OF 2009 Mrs.Lalita Liladhar Worlikar .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Suresh M.Kamble for the petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 04, 2009 P.C. The Petitioner impugns the order of the Committee for Schedule Tribe dated 16th July, 2009. From the impugned order we find that the committee had made available to the Petitioner, a copy of the Vigilance report. The Petitioner did not file reply. The Petitioner was called for personal hearing. The Petitioner failed to appear on all dates numbering ten. The Committee has considered the documentary evidence in the form of Father and Uncle’s extract from S.M.Bhatt High School and Junior College which are of the year 1944 and 1945 showing date of birth as 15.7.1932 and 15.11.1930 respectively wherein the Caste is shown as Sonkoli. The Committee has also considered the School admission entry of applicant’s real brother, aunt, father and uncle which also shows their caste as Hindu, Koli, Sonkoli. In other words, the documentary evidence which was produced shows that the Petitioner does not belong to Mahadeo Koli. Apart from the above, based on the Vigilance report the Committee has also considered the traits, characteristics, customs, etc. which was given by the applicant in the form and also the statement of his Uncle. From the evidence supplied, the committee came to the conclusion that those were not associated with the Mahadeo Koli, Scheduled Tribe. This is purely a finding of fact. In our opinion, considering the documentary evidence and the finding of fact, no case is made out for interference in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this court. Petition is rejected. (D.B. BHOSALE,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)