IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1418 of 2009 (M/S) Akhlak Ahmad …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another … Respondents Mr. H.S. Dhillon with Mr. Bharat Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for respondent no.3. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the citation no. 152881 dated 17.08.2009 issued by respondent no.2 and also for direction to respondent no.3 to recover the loan amount from the petitioner in installments. Facts of the case are that on 25.10.2008 petitioner took personal loan of Rs.50,000/- from Central Bank of India, Branch Mallital, Nainital for a period of three years. But the petitioner could not pay installments in time due to his financial problem and even today the petitioner is facing financial hardship. Petitioner has six members in his family and he is the only earning member in his family. According 2 to learned counsel for the petitioner, in case entire money is recovered from the petitioner, the petitioner will suffer a great loss and hardship. He further submitted that petitioner is ready to make payment of loan amount in installments alongwith interest. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned counsel for the respondent no.3-Bank submitted before the Court that since petitioner made default in making payment of monthly installments, recovery citation was issued against him. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case petitioner deposits Rs.7,500/- on or before 22nd September, 2009, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. Remaining amount of loan alongwith interest shall also be deposited by the petitioner in 12 equal installments to be fixed by respondent no.3- Bank. The respondent no.3-Bank is directed to give details of remaining installments to the petitioner on or before 22nd September, 2009. In the event of any default in making payment by the petitioner, this order will automatically stand vacated. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (V.K.Bist. J,) 26.08.2009 Arti 3