IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO: 21583 of 2004 Between: 1 Nethalla Jangamma, W/o Late Mallaiah, R/o Devarakonda Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District 2 Nethalla Sailamma, W/o Late Lingaiah, R/o Devarakonda Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District 3 Nethalla Yellamma, W/o Late Maraiah, R/o Devarakonda Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District 4 Nethalla Ramulu, S/o Lachaiah, R/o Devarakonda Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District 5 Nethall Ramulamma, W/o Venkulu, R/o Devarakonda Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Devarakonda, Devarakonda Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing pattadar pass books and title deeds in the name of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to issue the pattadar pass books and title deeds in the name of the petitioners forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NAKKARAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission, made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO: 21583 of 2004 ORDER: For the inaction of the respondent in not issuing the pattadar pass books and title deeds, the present writ petition is filed. 2. The writ petition is totally devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed, as it does not contain the actual date on which the petitioners have taken over the possession of the land in question. 3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioners from approaching the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer who is competent authority to issue title deeds and pattadar pass books. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ November 25, 2004 Kvr To 1. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Devarakonda, Devarakonda Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District 3 Two C.Cs. to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, (OUT) 4 Two C.D. Copies.