1 ss668-11 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.668 OF 2011 Ramdas Dadu Poojari ....Plaintiff V/s. Ratanlal T. Chorotia ....Defendant Mr.Mukesh J. Pabari for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The suit is based on a demand promissory note. The cheque issued towards the payment of the amount due thereunder was dishonoured. There is no reply to the plaintiff’s advocates notice demanding payment. 2. A complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed because the license under the Bombay Money Lenders Act was not produced. The same however is produced before this Court. 3. There is no reply to the plaintiff’s advocates notice demanding payment. The defendant is absent. He has not filed an appearance. 2 ss668-11 4. A compilation of documents is tendered in Court, taken on record and marked Exhibit “A” collectively. 5. There is no defence to the suit. There is nothing on record that militates against the averments and submissions in the plaint. 6. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of filing of the suit shall be at the rate of 12% p.a. Costs to be quantified as per rules. Refund, if any, as per rules.