IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7574 of 2010() ---------------------------------- (CR. NO. 88/2010 OF KUTTAMPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT) --------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 --------------------------------- LILLY, AGED 49 YEARS, W/O.ANTONY, RESIDING AT PANDANAL HOUSE, KUTTAMPUZHA VILLAGE, KALLELMEDU. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTTAMPUZHA POLICE STATION (INVESTIGATING OFFICER IN CR.NO.88/2010)REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. COCHIN-682 011. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V. RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------- Bail Application No. 7574 of 2010 --------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010. O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the 2nd accused in C.R. No.88 of 2010 of Kuttampuzha Police Station for an offence punishable under section 8(i) and (ii) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 55 litres of arrack seeks her enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that she has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under sec.41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify her release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv