1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4204 OF 2009 Prashant Jhunjhunwala : Applicant V/s. Union Territory of Daman and Diu & Anr. : Respondents .... Mr.Hari Pillai with Mr.Manish K. S. i/b. Mr.Taraq Sayyed for the applicant. Mr.D.A. Nalawade, Special Public Prosecutor for respondent no.1. Ms M.H. Mhate, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. .... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2009. P.C.: 1. The applicant has challenged the order of the Sessions Judge, Daman, directing that the accused be present in Court on the next date of hearing of the application for cancellation of bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the direction in question is not, in accordance with law, in view of the law laid down by this Court in Deepak Gopaldas Bajaj v. Union of India (2009 All M.R. (Cri.) 491). Mr.Nalawade, the learned Special Public Prosecutor, 2 submitted that the accused be directed to give some undertaking for appearance. It, however, does not appear that such an undertaking is necessary since, in case the Sessions Court cancels the bail, it can exercise its power for securing the presence of the accused. In this view of the matter, the direction dated 8.9.2009 that the accused shall remain present in Court is hereby set aside. Order accordingly. 3. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. S.A. BOBDE, J.