I- 1 3-0 INjyE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Writ Petition (Tl No. 5 ^ 3?~of 2007 ^ ^^ 07-^^'"~..--•"" ^^"" y'y- RECS1Vr^D-^on BR& to \\&\^ ^'a.^^^ M/s. Dineshbhai Raojibhai Patel a proprietory concern Prop. Dineshbhai Raojibhai Patel S/o Raojibhai aged about 59 years resident of House No. 36/569, Byron Bazar, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Versus ^ (1) Deputy Commissioner Oornmercia] Tax Vanijyik Kar Bhavan, Civil Lines Raipur (2) Assistant Commerclal Tax Officer, Circle III, Raipur (C.G.) ^ -(3) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Commercial Tax D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) Hon'ble the Chief Justice and his companion j udges of the Hon'ble Hiah Court of Judicature Chhattisaarh at BilasBur, E'etijtion under Articte 226j!2^f of the Constitution of India for issyance of sujtable.directions orders or writs includina writs in the natyLe_gf_mandamus certiorari eto. The hurnble petitionof the petitioner above named most N PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHMATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (T) N0.5497 OF 2007 M/s Dineshbhai Raojibhai Patel Versus Deputy Commissioner & Others Gowri RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 19th day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that at the relevant time the petitioner was not having the Form No.E-1 in his possession. Now the petitioner is in possession of the Form No.E-1. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make an application to the concerned authority, explaining the delay and non-fumishing of the Form No.E-1 at the relevant time, which may be considered and decided by the concerned authority on its own merits, in accordance with law. Shri Bhatia, learned Depufy Government Advocate appearing for the State, submits that if an application, as stated above, with explanation for delay and reasons for nof producing the Form No.E-1 is made to the concerned authority, the same shall be considered and decided on its own merits, in accordance with law. 3. In view of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of with the above-stated liberty. —-—.-——_- ——^ Sd/- Satish K.AgnLhotri Judge