1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MCA (Review) NO.135 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3074 OF 2008 (Shriramwadi Nagrik Sudhar Sangharsh Samiti vs. The Chief Secretary, Urban Land Development & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. SEPTEMBER 07, 2009. Heard Shri Rajkarne, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Mandpe, learned AGP for respondent No. 1 and Shri Mishra, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 4. The application is for review and hence after hearing the parties, considering the nature of order which we propose to pass, we do not find it necessary to issue notice to Respondents No. 5 & 6. The grievance of the applicant/ petitioner is in relation to alleged encroachment and he is seeking its removal. Our attention has been invited to legal notice dated 16.11.2005. We find that notice has been sent personally to Shri Waghmare, the then Chairman, NIT, Nagpur and Shri Lokesh Chandra, the then Commissioner, NMC, Nagpur. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the applicant states that the petitioner will make fresh representation to Respondents No.2 and 4 for removal of said encroachment. 2 If such a representation is made by 30th September 2009, Respondents No. 2 & 4 shall, after hearing the petitioner and also Respondents No. 5 & 6, take appropriate decision in relation thereto as early as possible and in any case by 31st December 2009. In view of this, nothing survives in review application, the same is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy expedited. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.