IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5276 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.09.2009 Johan Pal Singh .....Petitioner versus Vikas Garg and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr.Harmanjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved at the order dated 13.8.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, S.A.S.Nagar, Mohali, whereby his application for re-summoning his own witnesses for their further cross- examination, has been dismissed. The petitioner wanted to further cross-examine his own witnesses on the plea that his counsel was not present when these witnesses were cross-examined and that their version has been wrongly recorded. Suffice it to observe, that the petitioner's plea, that the cross- C.R. No.5276 of 2009 (O&M) 2 examination of his witnesses has been wrongly recorded, has no factual basis and cannot be accepted. No interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction is, thus, called for. However, it shall not preclude the petitioner to move an application before the Rent Controller for re-examination of the witnesses in terms of Section 137 of the Evidence Act, provided that he is able to make out a case to that effect. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the Rent Controller, Mohali, which shall be decided in accordance with law and uninfluenced of the observations made in the impugned order. The revision petition stands disposed of. Dasti. 14-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE