IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10781 of 2009 1. UMASHANKAR PRASAD AGRAWAL @ UMASHANKAR AGRAWAL 2. SAROJ KUMAR AGRAWAL Both sons of late Jitan Agrawal, residents of Village – Chenari Bazar Marg, P S – Chenari, District – Rohtas. ---------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR --------------- Opposite party ----------- 02. 17.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 5.2.2009 which is an order passed in Cr. Revision No. 263 of 2008. The revisional order was passed against the order taking cognizance against the petitioners. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that even according to the allegation as well as the nature of the injury no offence under section 307 IPC is made out. The very narration of the event is a matter which can at best be decided during the course of trial based on the evidence which may emerge. It is too early to accept the contention that section 307 is not made out in the case at this stage. Even otherwise the present quashing application amounts to a second revision against the revisional order which is not permissible. The application is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)