IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1087 of 2010 RADHEY CHOUDARY Versus BRAJ NANDAN CHAUDHARY ----------- 5 15.09.2010 Heard Mr. Devendra Pd. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. I.A. No. 8125 of 2010 has been filed for condoning the delay of six days in filing of this application. From the statements made in paragraphs 3 to 6 of this application, it appears that there was sufficient reason for not filing this application within time. As a result, this application is allowed and the delay in filing M.J.C. No. 1087 of 2010 is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider M.J.C. No. 1087 of 2010 on its own merit. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 1147 of 2007, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 09.02.2010. On being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in paragraphs 6 and 7 for omission on the part of the 2 petitioner at the time when the aforesaid Civil Revision was called out for hearing, this application is allowed. Civil Revision No. 1147 of 2007 is restored to its original file and number. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)