RSA 408 of 2007. 15.10.2008 Present: Mr. N.K.Tomar, counsel for the appellants. This is the defendant’s appeal against the judgment and decree of the two Courts below whereby the appellant herein has been injuncted by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from interfering in the possession of the respondents. Both the Courts below, on appreciation of the evidence on record, have rightly held the possession of the petitioners herein and rejected the defence set up by the appellants that they have become owners by way of adverse possession. In fact while dealing with this issue, the learned trial Court, considering the revenue record and the oral evidence, holds that the necessary ingredients as required by article 65 of the Limitation Act have not been established. This has been reaffirmed by the learned appellate Court. No question of law, much-less substantial question of law, arises for determination in this appeal, which is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending application(s) shall stand dismissed. October 15, 2008 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.