1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2781/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.NL Jadhav, Advocate for applicant; Mr.KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 17 th August,2009. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant/accused and learned APP. 2. During the course of submissions Mr.Jadhav informs the applicant/accused has deposited Rs.2,84,417/- and also Rs. 7640/- on 5.11.2008 (on same day two payments by different slips). The allegations against the applicant/accused are, he being an employee of the bank, could not have availed the financial facility exceeding Rs.2,50,000/-. However, dubiously in a meeting dated 16.3.2007, sanction of loans in favour of nine employees shown in which this applicant figures for disbursement of Rs.7,00,000/- as term loan. That apart, an amount of Rs. 6,50,000/- was also disbursed in favour of wife of this applicant who is a 2 teacher in Zilla Parishad School. The category of said loan was of term loan. 3. Wife’s application is independent allowed as she is carrying and due date is reported to be 18th October, 2009. The parameters for exercise of discretion in favour of wife of the present applicant/accused will not be available to be applied in case of the present applicant/accused. His role is more clear and flagrant in manipulating the bank record and taken personal benefit/gain. In the situation, I do not find any merit, the application is rejected. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran2781.09