IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4612 of 2010 Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav son of Hira Lal Yadav. ………Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar……….Opposite party. ----------- 05/ 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 302, 341, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated only because the deceased was his driver and earlier the deceased driver had hit another person by his tractor due to which the petitioner had to pay Rs.55,000.00 compensation. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the informant is the mother of the deceased and had the deceased been assaulted by the petitioner, he would have disclosed the fact to his mother. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that the petitioner has been falsely implicated due to animosity as he has got no criminal antecedent which is apparent from paragraph-45 of the case diary. He further states that the petitioner is in custody since January, 2009. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let 2 the petitioner, namely Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.91 of 2008. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )