IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 274 of 2009 Satendra Kumar Bhatnagar ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another .……. Respondents. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Date of decision: 17-04-2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the factual position depicted in paragraph – 3-B of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, and that, the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 2. In spite of the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks liberty of this Court to impugned the proceedings and the determination of the D.P.C. held on 20.11.2009 for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents states, that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to assail the proceedings and determination of D.P.C. held on 20.11.2009, if the petitioner is so advised, in accordance with law. (V.K. Bist, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 17.04.2010 17.04.2010 Amit