IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5513 of 2008 Date of decision: 7th July, 2010 Labh Singh … Petitioner Versus Sukhdev Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate for LRs of respondent No.3. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) The suit filed by the respondents was decreed. In pursuance thereof, the Executing Court had issued directions to the Field Kanungo to restore the Pahi. In the present revision petition, a prayer has been made that warrants of restoration of Pahi issued by the Executing Court should be withdrawn, as there was no direction to the Field Kanungo that demarcation ought to be carried at the spot. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the year 1987, the petitioner had built his house on the disputed land. When a revenue official goes at the spot in pursuance of the warrants of restoration of Pahi issued by the Court, it is always expected that he will act in consonance with the manual, which binds the revenue Civil Revision No.5513 of 2008 officials. Therefore, the demarcation is one of the necessary duties of the Field Kanungo. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition, as a decree-holder cannot be denied fruits of the long drawn litigation, in which he had succeeded. Dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 7, 2010 rps 2