IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 595 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14579/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------- K.MANJUNATHA KAMATH, S/O.K. HARIRAYA KAMATH, VIDYANAGAR, KASARAGOD-671 123. BY ADV. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- K.P.PAPPY, AGED NOT KNOWN, SON OF FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs COC. NO. 595/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A:COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/05/2009 IN WPC. NO.14579/2009 ON THE FILE OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ANNEXURE B:COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24/05/2010 IN I.A.NO.5257/2010 IN WPC. NO.14579 ON THE FILE OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Cont.Case (C) NO. 595 OF 2011 ======================= Dated this the 8th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T WP(C) No.14579/2009 was disposed of by Annexure A judgment directing the respondent, the then RDO to pass orders on the application made by the petitioner for assignment of land. It is complaining of inaction in pursuance to the direction in the judgment, the writ petition has been filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader has obtained instructions in the matter and submits that the application of the petitioner was forwarded by the RDO to the District Collector and that the District Collector has forwarded the same to the Government. It is submitted that since the land value is in excess of `50,000/-, Government sanction is necessary for passing orders on the application for assignment of land. 3. From the above, therefore, it can be seen that in terms of the rules framed by the Government, the respondent is awaiting Government orders for passing final order on the application of the petitioner for assignment of the land in question. Thus, it is not a case of inaction as alleged by the COC No.595/11 :2 : petitioner justifying proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. Contempt petition is closed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge