IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.3390 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 7.1.2009. Kesar Devi ....Petitioner Versus Lachman Dass and others ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL, J. **** The challenge in the present petition is to the orders passed by the Courts below whereby the prayer for interim injunction in an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 CPC was dismissed. The petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming herself to be the owner in possession of the land measuring 1 marla 5 sarsai i.e. 48 square yards being 14/474 share of land comprised in Khewat No.711 Khatauni No.873 square No.73 Killa No.18 total 4 kanal 6 marla situated at Chattergarh Patti Dabwali Road, Sirsa. Both the Courts below on the basis of material placed on record prima-facie found that the property as is shown in the suit was not tallying within the property mentioned in the gift deed. Even in the mutation sanctioned on the basis of gift deed the site plan was not prepared. Otherwise also the petitioner was only gifted 14/474 share out of Khewat and their being no partition of the Khewat in meets and bounds the petitioner cannot be said to be in possession of any specific portion of land. On the basis of material on record in my opinion no illegality has been committed by the learned Court below in dismissing the prayer for interim relief. No case for interference is made out. The revision petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 7.1.2009 JUDGE Reema