1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4243/2006 Mrs. Kumudini Ramkrishna Karekar and anr. ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: A. P. LAVANDE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 24 th September, 2007 Heard Mr. Khamborkar, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Sambre, Government Pleader for respondent. Mr. Khamborkar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he is not pressing the relief insofar as deemed permission under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is concerned. Mr. Khamborkar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have already given intimation to Tahsildar, Warora under Section 44A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code coupled with Rule 11 of the Rules and the same has not been decided yet. He further submits that, Tahsildar, Warora be directed to take decision upon the said intimation in terms of Section 44A (5) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Mr. Sambre, the learned Government Pleader has no objection, if the Tahsildar is directed to take appropriate 2 decision. In view of above, the Tahsildar is directed to take appropriate decision on intimation dated 30.12.2002 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order by following the rules and the provisions of the Code. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE kahale