THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8972 OF 2010 Dated 21st April, 2010 Between: D.Ram Kumar …Petitioner And The Circle Inspector of Police, Amberpet and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.K.Venkatesh Gupta Counsel for respondent Nos1 & 2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: ----- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2, in interfering in civil disputes between the petitioner and his mother on one side and respondent No.3 on the other, as arbitrary and illegal. I have heard Sri K.Venkatesh Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 and 2. Having regard to the manner in which the Writ Petition is proposed to be disposed of, no notice need be issued to respondent No.3. The petitioner claims that his mother entered into an understanding with respondent No.3 by which the former was permitted to occupy house bearing No.2-2-647/182/B/3/2 of Bagh Amberpet, Central Excise Colony, Hyderabad, as tenant and to collect the rents from the co-tenants in lieu of the petitioner’s mother spending about Rs.5 lakhs for construction and renovation of the building towards remodelling and raising additional structures. The petitioner pleaded that on respondent No.3 approaching respondent Nos.1 and 2, they have started harassing him and his mother. He further stated that on 15-04-2010 at 11.00 a.m., two constables visited his house and took him and his mother to the Police Station and detained them there and that after arresting his mother, respondent No.1 released him with the warning that if he does not vacate the premises in question, a case will be foisted against him also. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions submitted that on the report given by respondent No.3, Crime No.128 of 2010 has been registered by the Police against the petitioner’s mother and that no case has been registered against the petitioner. She further stated that neither of respondent Nos.1 and 2 has interfered in civil disputes between the petitioner and his mother on one side and respondent No.3 on the other nor they have demanded vacation of the premises in question by the petitioner and his mother. This statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader is placed on record and the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 not to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioner and his mother on one side and respondent No.3 on the other in the guise of pendency of the criminal case. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.11759 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 21st April, 2010 lur