... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.123 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.124 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.125 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.126 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.127 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.128 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.134 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.135 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.136 OF 2006, FIRST APPEAL NO.137 OF 2006, AND FIRST APPEAL NO.138 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Ms Lalita Panchakshni & Ms Kirti Rokil for the Appellant in all Appeals. Mr S.N. Gavade, A.G.P. for the State Government. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 18, 2006. : MARCH 18, 2006. : MARCH 18, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Appellant in all the Appeals. The Advocate appearing for the Appellants submitted that the Award made earlier by the reference Court under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was set aside by this Court on the ground that Appellant which is the acquiring body was not heard by the reference Court. The learned Advocate appearing for the Appellant pointed out that after remand, the Trial Court has passed same Award which was passed earlier and no reasons whatsoever have been recorded by the learned Trial Court. The learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants pointed out ... 2 ... that after the order of remand, the Appellant cross-examined the claimant. It is submitted that after hearing the Appellant, the learned Trial Court was required to reconsider and reappreciate the entire evidence and to make a proper Award. 2. Issue notice of the Respondents returnable on 21st April, 2006. The learned A.G.P. waives service for the State Government. 3. Notice will indicate that endeavour will be made to decide Appeals finally at admission stage. In addition to service of notice through Court, the Advocate for the Appellant will serve private notice to the original claimants and will file affidavit of service on or before the returnable date. The Advocate for the Appellant will forward an ordinary copy of this order alongwith private notice. The Advocate for the Appellant will file on record within period of two weeks from today compilation of pleadings, notes of evidence and other relevant documents. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE