IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (S/S) NO. 4115 OF 2001 Vinod Kumar Sharma ………….Petitioner. Versus District Inspector of School, Dehradun and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Jagdish Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard Mr. Jagdish Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1. A statement has been made by Mr. Jagdish Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner at the bar that the instant Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. On the basis of the above statement, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 17.6.2010 Rathour