IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9361 of 2011 KARAMLAL PANDIT AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the purchasers are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged by the complainant being the vendor that in the sale deed instead of plot no. 5759, plot no. 4593 has been mentioned. The sale deed was executed in 2008 when the complaint was filed in 2009 but no effort has been taken for setting aside the sale deed or filing any petition for correction in sale deed. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Karamlal Pandit, Vikash Pandit, Vijay Kumar Pandit, Ajay Kumar Pandit and Satrughan Pandit, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in 2 connection with complaint case no. 1258 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Madhepura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)