1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO.1358 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. S.V.Kotwal, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the respondent. Mr Milan Desai i/b Abdullah Shaikh for respondent nos 2 and 3. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 06/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Saste, learned APP, on instructions, states that the police will file charge sheet within four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the respondents-accused states that the accused does not have the original disputed document dated 7.8.2001, which is annexed at Exhibit-C to the application, and that he does not know T 2 who is in possession thereof. He made this statement, on instructions from his client, who is present in the court. In view of the statements made by the learned APP and the learned counsel for the complainant, Mr Kotwal, learned counsel for the applicant, does not press this application at this stage. Hence, the application is disposed of as not pressed. It is needless to state that the observations, if any, made by the learned Judge while granting anticipatory bail to the respondent-accused, are the prima facie impressions and the trial Court shall deal with the trial independently on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by these observations made in the order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)