IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24802 of 2010 1. ARTI LAL KAMAT son of late Raudi Kamat 2. Babalu Kamat son of Shiv Shankar Kamat-----Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.29864 of 2010 DEO KANT KAMAT son of late Maksudan Kamat------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 15.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are alleged for kidnapping the victim girl for the purpose of her marriage with petitioner no.1’s son co-accused Ramakant. That is corroborated by the victim girl also and is defended on the ground that she remained with Ramakant for a period of more than a month and filed a complaint against her father followed by statement on S.A. about her eloping with Ramakant. Submission of the learned counsel is that Ramakant was in love with the victim girl and when she came in custody of her parents betrayed from her statement given in complaint petition even withdrew the same making statement involving all the family members but love of Ramakant remained intact. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Raj Nagar P.S. case no.17 of 2010 subject to the 2 conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)