Crl. Misc. No. M- 7993 of 2009 Sushil Kumar Jain vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Maloo Chahal, DAG, Haryana. **** While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 23.3.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was being falsely roped in this case on the ground that his brother had purchased the tractor trolly from Mohd. Arbi and handed over the same to the petitioner. Notice of motion for 5.5.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Inspector Karam Singh, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 23.3.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE May 05, 2009 anita