IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3039 of 2008 Sidhi Singh son of Brahmdeo Singh, Resident of village Matihani, P.S. And district- aurangabad (Bihar) Versus 1. The Union Of India through Secretary Excise and Custom Department, New Delhi 1A. The State of Bihar. 2. Excise Superintendent, Excise and Custom, Bihar Patna. 3. District certificate officer, Aurangabad, Bihar 4. Additional Collector, Excise and Custom, Aurangabad (Bihar) 5. collector Excise Department, Janggir, District- Janggir, (Chattisgarh) 6. Additional Collector, Excise and Custom, Janggir, Chamba. (Chhatisgarh) 06.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Memo no. 1456 dated 11.07.1996 as contained in Annexure-1, whereby the Additional Excise Officer-Cum-Jila Adhikari, Bilaspur, Madhya Pradesh directed the Excise authority of Augangabad to realise the excise due to the tune of Rs. 1,82,233/- since the petitioner is the resident of Bihar. It appears that Annexure-1 has been issued from Madhya Pradesh at present Chhatisgarh in 1996 and it does not appear in pursuance to the said order any action was taken by the respondent authorities in Bihar. I think that the courts of Chhatisgarh have writ jurisdiction for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner. Since, the case is not maintainable before this Court, the application is disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)