IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10857 of 2010 SANJEEV KUMAR JHA @ SANJIB KUMAR JHA @ SANJAY KUMAR JHA, SON OF LATE GUNANAND JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MURLIACHAK(BAJRAHA), P.S. BISFI PATOUNA (O.P.), DISTRICT-MADHUBANI. ……………………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. -------- 2. 8.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 406/34, 409, 464, 419, 468, 469, 470, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report which was lodged against three named persons for the alleged act of allowing certain persons to talk to foreign country by conferencing system and as such putting the Government in huge loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been made accused only on - 2 - the ground that he was instrumental in recommending names of certain persons and, thus, helping to get the post paid connection. It has also been contended that the co- accused, Vijay Kumar Sharma, had already been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 5.3.2010 passed in Criminal Misc. No.4335 of 2010. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 19.12.2009. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Jha @ Sanjib Kumar Jha @ Sanjay Kumar Jha, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriyasarai P.S. Case No.387 of 2009 , with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to - 3 - take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)