IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4927 of 2011 MUKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAV@ MUKESH PRASAD SRIVASTAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 26.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner claims himself to be one of those persons who are working as seasonal D.D.T. Sprayer in the District Malaria Office from the year 1992. A panel is being prepared by the district authority for appointing them on class IV post but claim of the petitioner has been ignored because his name does not figure in the said list. He has annexed a few documents such as annexures 1 and 2 to show that he is working in that capacity and has also been paid. Therefore direction is required to be issued in her favour as has been done in large number of cases. Copies of such orders are annexed to the writ application. The leading case in this regard which dealt with the matter in quite a detail is a case of Vyas Chaudhar vrs. The State of Bihar which is CWJC No. 12533 of 2005 along with other analogous cases disposed of 18.3.2008. With the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner this writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the District Magistrate, East Champaran that the claim of the petitioner too will also be considered within the parameters laid down by learned Single Judge in the decision dated 18.3.2008 after due verification of record with regard to authenticity of actual state of affairs. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)