1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3063/2009 (Keshaodev Bahurilal Yadav vs. State of Maharashtra ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order Mr D R Bhoyar Adv.for applicant Mrs Rachana Wasnik, APP for Respondent -State *** C ORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 06 th OCTOBER ,2009. 1. Heard counsel for the respective parties. 2. Learned Advocate for the applicant prayed for grant of bail in favour of the applicant on the ground that other co-accused have been released on bail in connection with Regular Criminal Case No. 125/2009 pending before 2nd Juidicial Magistrate, First Class, Hinghanghat. He further contended that since the accusation are in the nature of theft punishable under section 379 of the IPC, the applicant be released on bail. 3. Learned APP objected grant of bail on the ground that although accusations are u/s 379 read with sec. 34 IPC, the applicant has not furnished sufficient information regarding his fixed address in Uttar Pradesh, inasmuch as he had given his address as R/o Chandanpura (UP)with occupation as hawker. No sufficient information has been provided regarding fixed and permanent address of the applicant in order to ensure his availability at the time of trial. Furthermore, it is contended by learned APP that charge is already framed before JMFC Hinghanghat in Criminal Case No.125/2009 and the trial is likely to commence soon. Under these circumstances, it is very difficult to ensure presence of the applicant at the trial for want of written information regarding his fixed and permanent address as also at least two sureties. Hence, I am not inclined to grant bail in his favour. Application is 2 rejected. However, the learned JMFC Hinghaghat is directed to dispose of Criminal Case No.125/2009 as early as possible. JUDGE. sahare