^ c^-»5TO / IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner W.P.(S)NO. S.<!6^ / 2009 Kishore Ram Nonha S/o Shri Bandhu Ram, Aged about 41 years, Hostel Superintendent, Maanpur, Distt. Surguja-(C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh ^' A^ ^ ^ /^e- ^.^^cy /^ A'" ,y .-• ^ .* ^/ ^.•^ f^y Through - The Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) 2. The Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Vanvasi Sewa Mandal, Mandla 3. The Collector (Tribal Welfare), Distt. Surguja-fC.G.) ^" 4. ' The Department Organizer, Madhya Pradesh Vanvasi Sewa Mandal, Department Office, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja-(C.G.) 5. ' Headniaster Incharge, Madhya Pradesh Vanvasi Sewa Mandal, Middle School, Maanpur, Tahsil - Samri, Distt. Surguja-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS. DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. p^ •^+'a- HC—78 ^^ ^ 31'WtBTfT'W ;w? SII^T arqte |NpN^ 7S( T<<!4ild<l, aTll-M' , fs|CTI<-iti< \.:£:..C.S>...^.L^.i ^ 3(1^1 TRR; (Tpf^^tt) ysmff'afer an^i SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRIlTINKBR DIWAKER 30.07.2009 Shri Arun Shukla, counsel f4r the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thaku^, Dy. A.G. for the State. Chalienge in the present 14.6.2009 (Annexure P/3) passed petition is to the order dated by the respondent No.2 by which the petitioner who is working a^ Surguja has been transferred t^> Tribal Hostel Rewati, District Surguja. Contention of counsel for tt(e petitioner is that on acoount of accident which took place in th| suffered inajor injuries and is 100S4 it is hterally unpossible for him to| further submits that he is not keeiji for a particular post but iookinj to his physical disability if he can ijie adjusted in the same place that will serve the purpose. Counsel for the State subm|its that let the petitioner make a representation to the competent w<fd<i!-< 'wrcrf ^i fsW <T-si^\: ^a.ifaiiait^r Hostel Superintendent, District year 2006, the petitioner has disabled person. He submits that join at the transferred place. He luthority and tfae same would be decided in accordance with l^w considering the facts and circuinstances of the case. Counsel for the petitioner ^grees to make a representation. However he submits that till hi& representation is decided, the petitioner may be given some prote^tive order. Accordingly, the petition is c^isposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representatio4 within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, the same would be decided by the authorities concem^d within a period of three weeks 1 froin the date of its receipt. Till then the inapugned order shall not be ——gwen-efi'eet-te:—-—. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^