IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17585 of 2008 RAJENDRA THAKUR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.5.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also A.P.P. for the State. Two petitioners who are named in the F.I.R. in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 240 of 2006, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 I.P.C.have prayed for anticipatory bail. The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused went to the house of informant armed with lethal weapons and started assaulting informant and injured Lalita Devi and Shanti Devi with intention to kill. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is enimical terms in between the parties and the present case is nothing but merely a counter blast of Saraiya P.S. Case No. 257/2007 filed by the petitioner no. 1 against the informant and others. It has also been alleged that no specific allegations have been made against the petitioners or they committing any over tact and the allegations are general in nature. It appears from the impugned order of the Sessions Judge, that injured Lalita Devi had received grievous injury whereas Shanti Devi had received injury simple in nature. Since the petitioners along with others armed with lethal weapons had come to the place of occurrence in the night hours and had caused injuries to two female inmates of the informant, the matter - 2 - appears to be serious in nature. In that view of the matter I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. to the petitioners. Accordingly this application stands rejected. M. Pal. (Abhijit Sinha, J.)