IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2007 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1929 OP.No. 11412 of 2002(H) ------------------------------------ PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. SUNNY T., IYPPACHAN, THEKKEL HOUSE, V.P. ANGADI POST, TIRUR - 2, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SAJEESH V.S., VADASSERI HOUSE, MARUDAYUR P.O., PAVARATTI (VIA), THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. RIJU A.S., AYINIPULLY HOUSE, PUTHAMPALLI POST, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY AND CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR. 2. THE WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF THE KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.ABRAHAM, SC.KAWWF BOARD THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.NO.11412/2002 H ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.19913/2002 IN O.P.NO.11412/2002 H DISMISSED 4/06/2007 SD/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE STATEMENT REGARDING CONTRIBUTIONTO THE FUND FOR 2000-2001 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONERS. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE NOTICES DTD. 24/03/2001 AND 29/03/2001 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONERS. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 18/06/2001 SENT BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 12/12/2001 IN O.P.37520/2001 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.162/2001 DTD. 5/02/2002 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 4./03/2002 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ Kss S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================================= O.P.No.11412 of 2002 ================================== Dated this the 4th day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner in this original petition is that although he was entitled to be enrolled as a member of the Kerala Abkari Workers Welfare Fund, the respondents have refused to enrol the petitioner. The petitioner relies on the documents produced by him to show that he is entitled to be enrolled as a member in the Fund. He has filed Ext.P6 representation before the 1st respondent in this regard and seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 as expeditiously as possible. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P6 and take appropriate decision in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Original petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE 2