HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 903 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 903 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 903 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2007 Chandrakant Dagadu More ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Katkade, Advocate appointed for the Applicant. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 DATED: APRIL 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . In the order dated 23.08.2007 we find that the direction was issued that the application for bail be placed after two weeks. . In Criminal Application No 903 of 2007 there was an order dated 13/09/2007 to keep the matter on board after three weeks. The matter has only come up on board on 11/04/2008. The matter was adjourned for one week and has come on board today. We have considered the arguments advanced. We find that the learned Judge while convicting the accused has relied on the evidence of P.W. No. 5 to P.W. No. 8 who were eye witnesses. In our opinion, therefore, this is not a fit case to grant bail. The application for bail rejected. The appeal which is of the year 2007 will be heard on its own turn. . In the meantime the office to file explanation in writing as to why the matter was not placed on board in terms of the directions of this court. Explanation to be submitted within one week from today. (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.V.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)