x“/ I\T TUL. HIGH COUK’I‘ Ob JUDTCATURE OF CH’iA’TTISGARH:BILASPUR Writ petition No” 13“) /2001. PETIQIONER : Gustafi: Tirki son of Poulus Tirki, ageé. 42'years, occupation — Govto service Senani (Aarakshak) Non 319 3lst Batalian, Raigarh (SAF), / Disttc Raigarh (C.G.)§Present resideni village Barpali, p.s.Karta1a, Korba. J H VERSUS §§§gOE-IDENE§ 5. l. State of Chhattisg'arh ,1' Through: Secretary Department 0f Home, Govt“ of Chhattisgarh, Raipur‘, Inspector General of Police (SAE') Supela (Bhilai), Distt. Burg (C.G.) g 3. Deputy Inslaecter Genéral of Police (SAF), BilaSpur Range, BilaSpur (CG). t.- qeM 2 w w 9 4., ,Supdt. 3lst. Batalian, of Police Raigarh Armed Forces; (C.G.)¢ As)” ¢g§“ W‘ WRIT PETITIgN UNDERERTIgkE 226/2727 OF TH: CONSTITUTION OF INDIA : § XI‘H ~22' WWWW mm 011 a mantion bemg' petitioner, the matier is taken up. The petifioner has: p erred’ this writ petition under Amide 226j227 of the Constitut order dated 10.04.2001 No <1 S P ‘t Battahml The casa of the pen 'one: 1s That ne complmed abcut 1§"‘x m 1€ gist Battahon SAF, Kajgaln. However, the petitioner r med absent f1om his dutv for 132 dave 011 account of illness. leave on 04.02.2000 alo saectionmg authority. H vever, a notice was received by The petitioner on 13.02.2001 se t by respondent No.4—i Superintendent 31st Battalion,» Raigarh (CG). The notice, appeared before the Head of the Department and submi ed his mneee cem’i‘icaie {Annexure A—2 es A—3) iSsued by the con emed Medicai Gfi‘ic'er. Later on The ‘ petitioner came to know usiogxiom Shri A.N.Bhakta, 001111361 for the petitioxmr. Shli Bhaskar Pyasi, PAL. for am State. mad€ bv kamad ccuagal for tbs « ; of India challenging the impugned nexure A] 1) passed by reepgnclent Ralgarh years of servme as Consta e a he peunoner anplrc1 for exfensmn o? e , w:& me deal cerniicate hero e th of Police Armed Forcee, petitioner, in response. to ’i on account of hie absence, a departmental enquiry was tarted against him and charges were aleo framed againet hi and ultimately, the petitioner was terminated from the servic . The petitioner further averred the: no opportunity was given o him and Enquiry Officer failed to consicier the grounds of abs nee of the petitioner. r f i S ( n u zm g e e a m e flag petitioner submits: that the petitionsr may be allowed t make a representation to respondent 110.4 for grant of 1Cavc and. minStat€m€nt 1'11 the: ssrvicc, to which learnad counsel for the Sta Having heard thé 1 d counsel for the parties aml having ' regard to the facts and cir tances of ihe case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed r presentation raising all hie grievances to respondent No.4 and in um respondent No.4 shall decide the representah'on withm a pe iod of thirty days from the date of receipt of the same coneideing all hie giievemces, in an objective manner with a reasoned 0rd r in accordance with law. ‘With the aforesaid dir ctions the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, 1,A.Nes.371f 004, 11282,! 2003, 2134/02 35 M.W;P. ' No.3484i 2003 also stand d poeed of ‘ Sd/- l Certified copy as per ales. , L.C.BHADOO "' Judge Learned counsel fo has 11o objection. t 6 e c s : . W mmm ‘ / m‘‘ WWW fs‘z‘t(m a; arm am