IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 14331 of 2008. Decided on: 23.02.2011. __________________________________________________________ Dr. Rajneesh Chander Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral). Mr. Anuj Nag, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. February 23, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?