.. ^- j zr^- SJMRI F RFMpy •^' BS^^^^L, SS^^S^f^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR rC.GJ WRIT PETITION fS) N0. rb^^S OF 2010 , PEIITIONE& ^ ^•yyy- .^* •^/s'-'''' ..-•''' ^\.-- \,^'" e^~ RESRONDENTS ^ Sanjay Nath Tiwari Son of Late Shri Sudesh Tiwari, aged about 47 years, Head Constable No. 06, Kotwali, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2: The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Inspector General of Police, Surguja Range Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). r 4. The Superintendent of Police, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). -WRIT RETITION.UNDER ARTICLE 226 OETHE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA 3aW, Wan—qr, W mm (1mm) WWW 12.7.2010 Shri V.K. Pandey, counsel Shri Vinod ’I‘ckam, Panel Lawyer for'the State] respondents, on ‘ advance copy. Heard. This petm''on has been Eed by the petiu'oner ventilau'ng grievance Ilimited 'to the aspects relating 1o pendency of his aypeal befoxe the Appellate Authority. Learned counsel for the pe titioner submits that aggn'eved by the onler of imposiiion of penalty, petitioner preferred a departmental appeal to respondent No.2] Director General of Police. It is submitted that though the appeal has remained pending since last 5 months, the same has not been decided, on account ofWhich, pe1i11‘oner may not be considered for promotion by the very soon. Taking into consideration the nature of grievance raised by the pen'u'oner' before this Court, it would be expedient in the interest of iinally with a direction. appeal Within a reasonable time, not exceeding 3 months hon: the date of receipt of copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed OE Manindra Mohan Shrivastava;~ .'.; J. , Judge authority, which is likely to be made justice to dispose OE this petin'on Accordingly, respondent directed to decide the petitioner’s No.2] Dimctor General of Police is Sd/— =.~‘ 4x