IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.1136 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2960 OF 2004 in SUIT NO. 3757 OF 1998 Mr.Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal .. Appellant versus Mrs.Anita Hermy D’Souza & Ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.Pankaj Kavli i/b Mrs.U.M. Jhaveri for the appellant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 16th December 2005. DATED : 16th December 2005. DATED : 16th December 2005. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. No case for interference is made out in the impugned order. However, we are of the view that Notice of Motion thus deserve to be heard at an early date. 3. We accordingly permit the appellant (plaintiff) to apply to the learned Judge for fixing the early date of hearing of the Notice of Motion. We observe that if such a request is made by the plaintiff, the learned Motion Judge shall endeavour herein to decide the Notice of Motion as early as possible. (R.M. LODHA, J) (R.M. LODHA, J) (R.M. LODHA, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)