IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20569 of 2010 RAVI @ RINKU KUMAR @ TINKU @ RAVI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 05.08.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Tharthari P.S. Case No. 86 of 2009 (G.R. No. 1796 of 2009) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 379 and 34 I.P.C. of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code were added to the set of allegation. The substance of allegation against this petitioner is of being accomplice to the crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tractor was taken on hire by one Abhay Kumar from the informant for loading and unloading of sand. He submits that this petitioner has simply been charged of accompanying this Abhay Kumar. He further submits that for the allegation aforesaid the petitioner has remained in custody since 6.1.2010 and that except one Arms Act case, the petitioner is not involved in any other 2 criminal case. Considering the circumstances and the submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner namely, Ravi @ Rinku Kumar @ Tinku@ Ravi Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sri S.B. Kumar, J.M.-Ist Class, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Tharthari P.S. Case No. 86 of 2009 (G.R. No. 1796 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- 1. that the father of the petitioner would stand as one of the bailors who would be under a duty to inform the Court below in case this petitioner is named or gets involved in any further case of similar nature after release and whereupon the Court below would cancel the bail bonds of this petitioner and take him into custody on grounds of misuse. 2. that the petitioner would be attending the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and upon failure on the part of the petitioner to attend the Court on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the 3 satisfaction of the Court below, the Court below would be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)