IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11074 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Gian Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The petitioner was appointed in the year 1990. He has completed 48 days in 1990. Thereafter he has completed more than 240 days in each calendar year. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work-charged status immediately after completion of 10 years service since he has been appointed before 31.12.1993 in view of the principles laid down by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp.(2) SCC, 316 and State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gehar Singh, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - (2007) 12 SCC, 43, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner, with all consequential benefits. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck).