IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18106 of 2010(K) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SAJEER BABU.F., INDIAN GLASS HOUSE, CHATHANNOOR, RESIDING AT VAVARACHAZHIKOM HOUSE, VADAKKEVILA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) II, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 3. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, (AUDIT ASSESSMENT), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. 4. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. R1 TO R4 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.18106 OF 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010. JUDGMENT Challenging Ext.P1 order passed by the 3rd respondent, the petitioner though filed a statutory appeal before 2nd respondent, the same did not turn to be fruitful as borne by Ext.P2 order passed by First Appellate Authority. The petitioner has now preferred Ext.P3 second appeal along with Ext.P4 petition for stay, which are pending consideration before the 1st respondent. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to the pendency of the said proceedings, the 4th respondent is proceeding with Ext. P5 Revenue Recovery notice, which is under challenge in this writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P4 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as W.P.(C). NO.18106 OF 2010 2 expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'six weeks' from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, till such appropriate orders are passed on Ext.P4 petition for stay, all further steps pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. mns