IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE S.A.No.246 of 2006 (Subhash B.Naik & Anr.V/s.Malu B.Naik & Anr.) ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Registrar’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Appellants. Mr.N.J.Patil for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. DATE : 10th July, 2006 DATE : 10th July, 2006 DATE : 10th July, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Both the Courts below have given concurrent finding to the effect that the Appellants (original Plaintiffs) could not prove the lawful title as well as their possession. Under these circumstances, both the Courts have held that the Appellants are not entitled to the relief of permanent injunction. No substantial question of law is involved in this Appeal. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)