IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31536 of 2008 RICHA JAIN D/O SUSHIL KUMAR AGRAWAL --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SANJEEV JAIN SON OFSRI RAMESH CHANDRA JAIN 3. RAMESH CHANDRA JAIN SON OF LATE DEO KUMAR JAIN 4. SUDHA JAIN WIFE OF RAMESH CHANDRA JAIN --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 23.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite parties are present. Present application was filed seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the learned lower Court in favour of the accuseds/ (opposite party nos. 2 to 4). It appears that the matter was pursued on several dates by the learned trial Court with a view to resolve the dispute between the wife (complainant/informant) and the husband/ opposite party no.2. Ultimately learned trial Court released them on anticipatory bail. It further appears that subsequent thereto both the parties appeared before the said Court and on their prayer the matter was referred to the conciliation centre. Learned counsel for the petitioner has now taken a stand, in my view fair, that she would not be pressing the present application seeking cancellation of bail. It is stated at the Bar that she would sincerely endeavour to reconcile the dispute/issues between her and the husband/opposite party no.2. It is stated that she will appear in the conciliation proceeding for the said purpose. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties including husband/opposite party no.2 states that the husband 2 shall also participate in the said proceeding before the conciliation officer which is allegedly pending. The application is disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)