IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1013 of 2009 SUDAMA TANTI @ SUDAMA SHARMA @ TANTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya, A.P.P. ----------- 3 10.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for petitioner SUDAMA TANTI @ SUDAMA SHARMA @ TANTI who is in custody since 17.1.2008 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 428 of 2008 arising out of Amarpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2008 registered under sections 302/201/34 IPC. The son of the informant Gurudeo Sharma is said to have accompanied Sudama Tanti to Ludhiana where they were employed together and about a month back his son returned to the village and thereafter suddenly he was found dead after his son and petitioner Sudama had met in the evening on 6.1.2008 and they had left for Punjab. The dead body of Gurudeo was recovered from the forest 3 – 4 days later and the head of Gurdudeo was found cut. The charge sheet has been submitted in this case. But apart from the statement of showing complicity of the petitioner only because he was last seen together with the deceased nothing else has been pointed out to me. This cannot be a ground for detaining him in a custody. In the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner SUDAMA TANTI @ SUDAMA SHARMA @ TANTI is directed 2 to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Presiding Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, Banka, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 428 of 2008 arising out of Amarpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2008. Spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)