THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 5203 of 2009 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 02.06.2009, passed by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 431 of 2009 in I.A. No. 1300 of 2002 in O.S. No. 983 of 1999, filed by the petitioner praying to set aside the default order dated 11.02.2005 and restore I.A. No. 1300 of 2002 to its original stage. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. As can be seen from the order under revision, the suit filed by the petitioner against the respondent for mandatory injunction was dismissed for default on 23.02.2002 as none represented the petitioner for leading evidence on his behalf. To set aside the default order and to restore the suit to file, the petitioner filed application in I.A. No.1300 of 2002. On 21.12.2004, as the respondent was called absent and as respondent did not file any counter he was set ex parte and the matter was posted to 11.02.2005. On that day, as there was no representation for the petitioner, the restoration application was dismissed. Though the petitioner contended that the restoration application was posted on 11.02.2005 for the counter of the respondent, and that neither himself nor his advocate could represent the matter on that day because he had an appointment with the Doctor and while his Advocate was busy in the civil Court, the fact remains, the Court below in the absence of any material filed by the petitioner to show that the petitioner had appointment with the Doctor and in which Court the counsel was busy, and considering the fact that on 11.02.2005, the matter was not posted for counter of the respondents came to the conclusion that the petitioner was not pursuing the matter regularly, and that he failed to explain the reason for not attending the Court on 11.02.2005 and dismissed the present application, filed by the petitioner praying to set aside the order dated 11.02.2005 passed in I.A. No. 1300 of 2002, filed by the petitioner praying to set aside the order dated 23.02.2002 dismissing the suit for default, and exception can be taken thereto. In the above view of the matter, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: November, 2009 KSR