THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27337 of 2010 Date: 03.11.2010 Between: Edapalapati Venkateswarlu ..... Petitioner AND The Tahasildar, Guntur and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.V.L. Murthy Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in seeking to dispossess the petitioner from his house property admeasuring Ac.0.03 cents in survey Nos.270/2 and 272-1B of Kondalarayunipalem, Puvvada Panchayat, Nuzendla Mandal, Guntur District without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and perused the record. In his affidavit, the petitioner has averred that his late father was the pattadar of the abovementioned house property situated in B.C. colony and that he was given possession certificate in the year 1992. The petitioner further averred that some persons, who are the residents of the village, tried to interfere with their possession and that his mother along with the neighbouring house owner filed O.S.No.212 of 2009 in the Court of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Venukonda and that the same is pending. It is the further case of the petitioner that the persons, who are the opposite parties to the civil suit, have approached respondent No.1, who in turn tried to dispossess the petitioner from his property. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the land in question is situated adjacent to the property in respect of which patta was granted to late father of the petitioner and that possession certificate was issued in recognition of his possession. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, is unable to state the provision of law under which a possession certificate can be given by the revenue authorities. Be that as it may, in the absence of any right or title over the land in question, the petitioner cannot invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.34920 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 03rd November, 2010 GHN