IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21212 of 2009 1. MD.WASIL @ CHUNNA 2. Md. Wasid @ Munna Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is false allegation against the petitioners that they took the informant’s son to Vadayee but he did not come back. It has come in the case diary that he was pulling rickshaw at Varnarash, supported by the evidence of victim’s mother corroborated by other witnesses also. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 172 of 2005 (G.R. No. 726 of 2005), above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)