Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9772 OF 2009 Madhukar Onkar Borale ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtara & Ors. .Respondents Mr. A.D. Thorat for the petitioner. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.G.S. Hegde i/b. G.S. Hegde & Associates for the respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 14TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the post which is holding is temporary he has not been regularised, though the others who were in the temporary list were regularised. 2. On behalf of the Corporation learned Counsel on taking instructions makes a statement that the Departmental Enqiry is going on against the petitioner and in these circumstances the petitioner has to be regularised depending upon the outcome of the departmental proceedings and as soon as the departmental enquiry is over the respondents shall take a decision on the same. 3. Considering the controversy and the statement made on behalf of the respondent we do not find this to be a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Suffice it to say that the enquiry to be completed within a period of 4 months from today. The petitioner to cooperate with the enquiry. With the above observations, petition disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)