: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.2 of 2001 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.2 of 2001 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.2 of 2001 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.228 of 1998 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.228 of 1998 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.228 of 1998 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.1 of 2001 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.1 of 2001 TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.1 of 2001 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.781 of 1998 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.781 of 1998 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.781 of 1998 Kewal Krishna Hitkari .. Plaintiff. Versus Rajesh O. Kakkar .. Defendant. Mrs.Shalini Shankar for plaintiff. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 14th November, 2008. DATE : 14th November, 2008. DATE : 14th November, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Learned Advocate for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff, who was the sole executor of the last Will and Testament has expired and there is nobody to prosecute this suit and that widow of the sole executor has filed petition for letters of administration with the copy of the Will annexed. 2. In view of the aforesaid developments, this suit does not survive and is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)