e .s-v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATOTUE ATBn.ASPURtC.O.l WMT PEnTIOW WO. (4<9!'/2005 PE'HTIOHER MANBODHSAHU, S/0. LATE SHRI JOGI RAMSAHU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, WORKING AS SUB- INSPECTOR OF POUCE, P.S. BEDRE, DISTiaCTBUAPUR (C.G.) VBRSUS RESPONDEinS .'s.^-?^ ^^ ^y^^<? ^^^ ^<p°»..--^' ^ "^\^ \^ ^5. ^TATE OF TliROUGH DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR CHHATHSGARH, SEGRETARY, OF HOME, D.K.S. BHAWAN, (CHHATriSGARH). THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POUCE, POUCE HEADQUARTER, RAIPUR (CHHATHSGARH) THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POUCE, BASTAR RANGE, JAGDALPUR (CHHATTISGARH) THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OP POLICE (ADMINI8TRATION), POUCE HQ., RAIPUR (CHHATnSGARH). THE SUPERINTENDENT OP POLICE, DISTRICT BIJAPUR, (CfiHATHSGARH.) wmr pEwnoN um»@t AirracLE 226/227 OF IBIE CONSTITUTIOtl OF IMMA FOR ISSUAWCE O^ WMT IN THE KATURB OF MiAaU»ABBUS. CER'raGiRAM. PIKXmBlMOII AND FOR OTKEK SOtTABI^ WMTORWRiTS.TQRDEROR (MtDEKS. mRBCnONORBilREC'nCTBS. ® XI-HC-22 3^ •<<Wltf<l, »rfly'IS,isll-IIUy 311^1 i.liicb . t-of \VzT-joS~" 11*1MI sftHlch ••••••••••••••••••••• ^pj- 200 sn^i^i f^IR?37T^T affiw.gfei' ^^iA-/ 24.6.2005 Siut. Reenia Dubey, couu^el for the {ytitioner. Shri G. K. Beriwal, Depufty Advocate General for the State. Heard. \ Learaed counsel fdr lt|e petitioner subinits that identical orders have been pa^sed ia several cases wllere afler traasfer order,no relieving <^rder was passed. This Court in W.P.No. 4709/2004 (Krishu^ others) vide order dated 1£| respondents to relieve the petiti(| date of the production of the co^ of the order. In view of the foregoiag, ^he respondents are directed to coiuply wifh the traasfer o^-der by issuirig appropriate order for relieviag the petitione^ wifhia a period of 15 days froiu fhe date ofreceipt ofcopy ^fthis order. WitB. the above direction, of fiiiaUy. ctil<<f<-l<fl-f HliaT ff feizt ^TKR ^3rf^IT3n^T [ Murari Mishra Vs. State & .1.2005 has directed the >ner wifhin 15 davs froin the the petition stauds disposed Sd/- Satish K. Agnihbtri Judge