IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 9420 of 2007 Between: 1 Saini Durgaiah S/o S. Durgaiah 2 Saini Sidamma W/o S. Durgaiah 3 Saini Agonda S/o S. Durgaiah All are R/o Pothamasettipalli Village, Kolcharam Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Joint Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 Masani Budamma W/o Bhoomaiah 3 Masani Indira W/o Kishan (Grand dAughter of Masani Budamma) respondnet Nos. 2 and 3 residents of Pothensettipalli Village, Kolcharam, Mandal, Medak district. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ order or Direction more particualrly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari, to call for the records relating to File No. F3/1401/2007 dt 15-3-2007 of the 1st respondnet andto quash the same and consequently directthe 1st respondnet to make an enquiry and to set a side the order dt 26-8-2006 passed in Case No. F3/8263/2005- F3/3/Assign/2006 before the 1st respondent, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MANDA ADAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 9420 of 2007 21-07-2009 Oral Order: The substantive grievance in this writ petition is that at the instance of the 3rd respondent, the 1st respondent by an order 26-08-2006 directed the Mandal Revenue Officer and the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kulcharam to evict the petitioners from land of an extent of Ac.03-15 guntas in survey No. 318/163 of Pothamshetpalli village, Kulcharam Mandal, Medak District, without lawful authority and in gross and blatant abuse of either executive or quasi judicial power. When the petitioners applied to the 1st respondent for re- consideration of the said illegal order, by the endorsement dated 15-03-2007 their request for re-consideration is also rejected. After notice before admission was issued and on a deeper reflection, the 1st respondent has now passed an order bearing reference No. F3/3455/2009 dated 20-07- 2009 withdrawing the earlier order dated 26-08-2006. As the substantive grievance of the petitioners does not survive for adjudication, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 21-07-2009 Pvks