IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 36 of 2008. Decided on: 28.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Salig Ram. … Petitioner. Versus G.K. Srivastva and another. … Contemnors/Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Bheem Raj, Advocate vice Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the Contemnors/ Respondents : None. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Bheem Raj, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening events. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 28, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?