IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.639 of 1998 1. SUBORDINATE FOREST SERVICE Association, Bihar at Sanjay Gandhi Botanical Garden, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna-1, through its Secretary General (Maha Mantree) Sri Jai Prakash Singh, son of Late Dwijan Prasad Singh Vill. + P.O. Dhanura, P.S. Kahalgaon, Distt. Bhagalpur, presently posted as Forest Guard, Forest Extension Division Purnia. 2. Shoe Shankar Thakur, Son of Late Jaleshwar Thakur, P.O. + Vill. Sugma, P.S. Salkhua, Distt. Saharsa, at present posted as Forest Guard, Western Forest Division Ranchi. 3. Ashok Kumar Arya, Son of Late Rajeshwar Singh, Vill. Bhadurpur, P.O. + P.S. Phulwarisharif, Distt. Patna, at present posted as Forest Guard, Forest Extension Division, Patna. 4. Rajendra Prasad Singh, S/o Late Suryadeo Singh, Vill. Bishun Bigha, P.O. Tegra, P.S. Barun, Distt. Aurangabad, presently posted as Forest Guard at Sanjay Gandhi Botanical Garden, Patna. 5. Zia-ur-Rehman S/o Wasir-ur-Rehman, Vill Chitkohra Bazar, P.O. Anisabad, Distt. Patna-2 at present posted as Forester, Territorial Forest Division, Giridih. 6. Sudeshwar Singh S/o Late Daharu Singh, resident of Vill. Bara Basantpur, P.O. Daulatpur P.S. Ara (Mufassil), Distt. Bhojpur (Ara), presently posted as Forester, Forest Extension Division Bhojpur at Ara ………Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Deputy Secretary to the Govt., Department of Forest and Environment, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Principal Chief Conservator of forest, Bihar, Ranchi. 4. The Regional Chief Conservator of Forest, New Secretariat, Patna. 5. The Conservator of Forest, Nehru Nagar, North S.K. Puri, Patna. ………..Respondents. ----------- 10 02.11.2010 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Piyush Lal, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No. 3 for the respondents at length. After hearing the learned counsel at length, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw this writ application. It is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. 2 Let it be recorded that learned counsel for the petitioners has withdrawn the writ petition on the strength of the instructions from representative of the petitioners present in Court. (S.K. Katriar, J.) Anjani/M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )