BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P(227)No. 37R Izoos singile @‘ECig? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ii‘ PETITIO DEFEND’XEIBI" Noor Ali, S/o. Karim Shah, aged about 6O years, Rlo. Maudahapara, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS /’ RESPON PLAINTIFDFESNTS :1 Sunil Kumar Gupta, Slo. Late Ayodhya Prasad Gupta, aged about 40 years, Rlo. Gurunanak Chowk, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) \E’D 2. / Hazi Subrati, Slo. Deen Ali, aged about w /§7 years, , w teaw‘d“e.oxw} Jfx‘ {owl/w? :»(:\g.5 ...... 3. Shafique Ahmad, S/o. Manzur Ahmad, aged about 43 years, ?} Q a» Ali R/o. Maudahapara, Raipur, Tahsil é“ \V arid District Raipur (C.G.) XI-Hc—m mmgMC1%)§?3 a m? mm (my) $Wggg‘ mmm mmmgyagm 8.3. Hon’bie Shari Justice N.K. arwal 18.06.2009 I kl f Shri AK Prasadg Advocate‘ )r the petiiiomr, Shri GS Agrawal, Sr. Advo ate with Shri KR Nair, Advocaies L3 ‘ Agrawal, for respondents. \x Shri Prasad, iearned counse appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to Withdr' W this petition with liberty to raise limitation and all other defences ail the points regarding court fee. which are ‘ consequential to t e amendments allowed to be incorporated in the plaint. Frayer is not opposed by 0t er side. Accordingly the petition is isposed of with a direction that if the petitioner files an applicati n for amendment to amend his pleadings, regarding court fee, limitation and ail other defences :9 which are consequential to the amendment, allowed in favour of shall them to amend their written plaintiff, the trial court permit , statement and shall proceed to cecide the suit in accordance with law. No order asto c’o/sts f 8d]. , . p. ' N.K.Agrawal; Satii ‘ Judge ‘