XI- 3TT^T^ fqii°h Tfsn 3Tf^T $h^si<=h i ^. K^t ^ c^-- 3^' ^I^I^-M, ?$Tfi-H4t<S, [sl^K^y •W^TT -^^ ......^....•'........................................^ 200 \ 3n^?T ^w (ysf^^) '^?rTW ^ftn 3?n^r Petitioner R.l ab] Td Respondent Contemnor H^rsh Kumar, Execiitive Englneer-cum- Estate Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing board, Pa|dmanbhpur, Durg (CG). 29-6-2007 Shri Ratan Pusty, counsel \ Heard. Learned counsei for the respondent has declded the repr| the Court order dated 8-3-2007, y of hearing to the petitioner. Since the representation <j the question of filing of contempt representation is not decided in ^ flle appropriate proceedings befo^ ^i^F^i^li 'HFT^rf ^.'fel€t'<P»{^I< '^ ^tStFT 3T?^T <. Taiwar, S/o Shri Janakraj, Talwar, aged 3ut 42 years, R/o 959 Kabir Marg, Napier wn, Jabalpur (MP). -Versus- :or the petitioner. petitloner submits that even though the ^sentation of the petitioner in pursuance of ut the respondent has not given opportunity >f the pet.itioner has already been decided, Detition does not arise at ali, however, Ifthe ccordance with !aw then the petltioner may e the appropriate Court. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge