1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.574 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2422 OF 2006 Somchand Shah & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. United Mazdoor Union & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Ambar Joshi for the Petitioners. Mr. Yogendra M.Pendse for Respondent No.1. Mr. Yogesh Dabke for Respondent Nos.3 to 7. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. May 5, 2008. P.C.: The workers to whom the reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 relates, were impleaded as parties to these proceedings by an order dated 2nd April 2008 passed in Civil Application 835 of 2008 taken out by the workmen. The petition is placed on Board since Consent Terms have been arrived at as between the Petitioner and the workmen 2 concerned, namely, Respondent Nos.3 to 7. The Consent Terms signed by the Third Petitioner for and on behalf of the First and Second Petitioners and by Respondent Nos.3 to 7 and by their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked “X”. Counsel appearing on behalf of the First Respondent Union states that the Union is not a party to these Consent Terms since the workers have directly settled the matter with the management. Since the dispute has been settled by the workmen and the management, there shall be an order in terms of the Consent Terms. The reference shall be governed by the Consent Terms and shall stand answered in terms thereof. The order passed by the Labour Court shall stand substituted by the Consent Terms which have been filed by the management and Respondent No.3 to 7. Rule discharged. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, Civil Application 2422 of 2006 does not survive and shall accordingly stand disposed of. .... 3