\ Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. ’Jusfice Dhirendm Mishra). Wri'l‘ Pefifior (s) No.4776/08 (P'eh'fion under Ar‘r.226 of Consfifufion of India) PETITIONER . ' Aadim Ja'ri Seva Sahkari Sar‘ni‘ry Maryadif, (LAMPS), ' Karmchar‘i Sangh, BasTar‘ Sambhag, Jagdalpur‘, having regisfr-a’rioa. No.15384, regisfered under The Sociefies Fegisfr‘ikar‘an Adhiniyam, 1973 ‘rhr‘ough’r its President, Vishnu Pmsad Sahu, aged aboui 44 year's, v son of Shri Panchu Ram Sahu, Residem‘ of Bijapur- Alfa Schooi Road, Tahsil and Dis‘r‘r. Bijapur‘ CG. Ve‘ sus h k r , \ RESPONDENTS 1. S’raTe of ha‘r’risgar‘h, Through the Secrefary, Depar‘rmem‘ of Co-operafive SocieTy, Manfralaya‘, Dau Kaiyan Sing ‘Bhawan, Raipur (C6) 2. Zila Sah i Kendriya Bank Maryadif—J’agdalpur‘ Through ITS Chairman. 3. Regisfrar‘, Ca-opemtive Sociefy, ChhaT‘risgarh, Raipur ‘4. Chief‘Execuii’ve officer, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Jagdalpur, Dish”. Basfar (C.G.) 11.12.2008 Mr. Prashan’r Jaiswal, Sr. Ac vocaTe wi1'h Mr. Ajay Mishra, Advocafe for The pefi‘rioners. Mrs. Smi’ra Ghai, Panel Lawyer for The Sfafe. Mr. PrafuH Bhar‘af, Advoca‘re, for responden’r No.2 & 4. Heard. By ’rhis pe’rifion fhe pe’ri’rioner has impugned The adverTisemenT of eb 109 vacanT osTs ofwlf F/y 3 Pr-abaridak has been advertised “robe fiHed in by direcf recruifmem. This pefi’rion has been fiied on The griound ’rhm‘ as per- Rule 24 (7) of ’rhe amended Zila‘ Shahkar‘i Kendriyh Bank Karamchari Seva (Niyojan, Nibandhan ’ra‘rha Unki Karya S‘ri’ i) Niyam, 1982, 50% pos’rs of Samifi > Prabandak are ’ro be filled—in by w y of promo’rion from Assis’ranf Samifi 'Prabandak/ Salesman, whereas, r maining 50% pos’rs are To be filled-in from direc‘r recrui’rmenf. Howeve , by the :impugned adverh’semen’r 100% appointmen‘rs are To be made ‘rhrou h direct recruifmenf. Mr. Bharaf, learned couns i appearing for respondent No.2 & 4 submi‘rs Tha’r fhe impugned adverfi emenf has already been wi’rhdrawn and ins’fead adverfisemen‘r of Annex re R2-1 & R2-2 have been published inv/ifing applicm‘ions for appoinfme ’r on 50% posts by direc‘r recruifmenf and on remaining 50% pos’rs by pro ofionifrom fhe iower cadre. In view of above publicaT on of subsequent advertisements of Annexure R2-1 & R2-2, the grievan e of the petitioner that amended rules are not being followed stands redr ssedh ‘Accordingly, the petition is isposed of. Consequently, interim order passed in favour of the petitioner tand vacated Sdl- 3 Dhirendra Mishral Judge r ‘ ‘ i$§¥§$ gi "”Jy-.