IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44468 of 2010 1. BALBIR SINGH 2. CHANDASHI SINGH BOTH SONS OF LATE DWARIK SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.38293 of 2010 LAL BIHARI SINGH, SON OF LATE DWARIK SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 24.01.2011 Both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases have arisen out of Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases are being disposed of by this common order. Allegedly, the petitioners badly assaulted the informant’s brother with lathi as a result of which he died then and there. Learned counsels appearing for the petitioners submit that the informant and petitioners are Gotias and, as a matter of fact, the alleged occurrence took place on account of petty dispute and there was no intention of the petitioners to kill the deceased. They further submit that the petitioners are languishing in jail custody for more than seven months. The post mortem report of the deceased reveals that he has received several fracture injuries on his person. So the aforesaid injuries prima facie indicate the intention of the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature of injuries of the deceased I am not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioners within nine months from the date of receipt of this order and if the trial of the petitioners is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )