IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2009 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16459 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MRS.RAJI MATHEW, W/O.PRAJOSH JACOB, NERIYAMTHARA, KILIROOR, KANJIRAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, TRIVANDRUM. 4. L.B.S.CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR NANDAVANAM, PALAYAM, TRIVANDRUM-33. ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR SC, LBS CENTRE FOR R4 GP SRI. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).16459/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner who wrote the SET examination is aggrieved that he has been declared to be failed in spite of the fact that he had secured 50% marks. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the 4th respondent that whatever be the mode of calculation, marks obtained by the petitioner as reflected in Ext.P4 is not sufficient to declare his pass in terms of clause 13 of the prospectus. I find no reason to disagree. Writ petition is bereft of merit and hence the same is dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs