t-'--- •:-'• li-C. ,'^s 3 /2^-o _IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. //^ /2086-<3'7 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONERS ^ ^ ^ ^'^' ,; ^. ^/\AV !^'' V-^ y 0fa ^ •^^ ,^ Tejram Bhagat, aged about 47 years, son of Shri Sukharu Ram Bhagat, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Dahidand, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Csl.no.341 in AnnexureP-1) _2_ Ramnath Sai Paikra, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Anand Sai, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Kaaya Ashram Rauni, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 409 ofAnnexure P-1) -3. • Dhuran Sai Paikra, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Bagar Sai, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Rauni, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G. (sl.no. 448) 4. Sukhram Bhagat, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Bhikhu Ram, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Sukma, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 415 ofAnnexureP-l') •S': Surendra Kumar Dehri, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Kiaa Ram, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Bodapahri, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 229 ofAnn P-1) 6. Smt. Ignasia Kujur, aged about 50 years, wife of Shri Vijay Ekka, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary Schoo] Ramsama, Bagicha, Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no.358 of P-1) 7. Mangal Nath Ram, aged about 4.3 years, son of Shri Budu Ram, Assistant Teacher,- Govemment Tribal Primary School Khuta-tagar, Bagicha, Distt; Jaslyw (G.G.) (sl.no.378 ofAnn P-1) "SSs'S;''Kf,'lin •.•".•"Bt-.l RESPONDENTS 8,. Manvodh Ram Bhagat, aged about 49 years, son of Shri Nemi Ram Bhagat, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Bartoli, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 366 o fAnnP-1) <"9; Sudama Prasad Mishra, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Kalinath Mishra, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Lota, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no.42 ofAnn P-1) A-Q. Belasimus Tirky, aged about 52 years, son of Shri Bhukha Tirky, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Ondka, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 293 ofAnnexure P-1) 11. Aghan Sai, aged about 43 years, son of Shri Manku Ram, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Raikera, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 317 ofAnnexure P-1). 12. Shankar Ram Barua, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Budh Bama, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Ghat-tari, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) fsl.no. 333 of AnnexureP-1) VERSUS J., State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2, The Assistanf Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) /3'. The Block Education officer, Block Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONERS As per cause title. F^S^"^^'?^;'^^^^-?,"; f-Xy^W.'i^^'* "fr.^ffLl^l^ff^ J HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 117 of 2007 Petitioners : AAonsingh Khande and others Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh and o'thers W. P.(S\ No. 118 of 2007 Petitioners : Tejram Bhagat and others Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh and others W. P.fSl No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanjay Kumar Sinha Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt-iS9arh and ono-ther W. P.fSlNo. 126 of 2007 Petitioner : Bhuvneshwar Pnsad PratVion Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh nnd o-thers W. P.(S\ No. 127 of 2007 Petitioner : Kulronjan Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others W. P.fS) No. 128 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S) No. 129 of 2007 Petitioner : Philos Akshoy AAukut Ti99a Verais Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S\ No. 130 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Prusadi 8ha9at Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond another W. P.fS) No. 131 of 2007 Petitioner ; Sagar Sai Versus fteqaondents : State of Onhartisywh and others W. P.fSl No. 133 of 2007 Petitioner : Inus Bek Versus Kespondents : State of Chhatl-isgarh and another W. P.fS) hto. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Batiram Bha9at Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S\ No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chandra Xalco Versus ftespondents ; State of ChhattiS9arh ond others W. P.(S) Nk». 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashikala Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of ChhatlTS9orh and ano-ther W. P fS) No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhancbram Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh andcnother W. P.(S\ No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementuw Tigga Versus Respondents : State of Chhaf-isgarh and ano-ther W. P.fSl No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Kridina Ram Patel Versus Resfmndents : State of Chhattisgarh cnd others W. P./SlNo. t47of2W7 Petitioner ; Laxminaruyon Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-i^arh and another W. P.(S\ Nk>. 149 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. AAaxi Miliyani Toppo Versus Re^tondents : State of Chhdrttisgarh ond onother W. P./S) No. 150 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Rcymani Versus Respondents ; S'tute of 0»hattis9orhand others W. P.(S) No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Chamru Ram Nogdeo Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others W. P.(S) No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner : fianesh Rom Pradhon Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond ano-ther W. P.(S\ No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner ; Chhotekil Khanna Versus Kespondents : State of ChhattiS9arh and another W. P.fS) No. 1<S of 2007 Petitioner : Ramkumar Choudhari Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh cnd ano-ther And W. P.(S\ No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohm Nayorf< Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond another SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice SaHsh K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. A.N. Bhokta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovemment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for -the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 17th Doy of Janucuy, 2007) 1. Leamed counset oppearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that •the facfrs of the present writ petitions are simitar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari cnd o'thers vs. State fiovemment of Chhatt-isgarh & others), which wos allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of \aui involved is atso -the same. Subha«h 2. In view of the above-stated submissions mode by lecmed counset for •the parties, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in WJ>. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of •this order be placed on record in o-ther connected writ petttion. _— sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge