1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR COMPANY APPEAL NO.6 OF 2009. IN CAL NO.173/08 IN OLR NO.62/03 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.5 OF 2001. PIYUSH S/O PRADEEP SEJPAL, KALYAN (WEST), DISTRICT THANE & ANOTHER. VS THE AKOLA OIL INEDUSTRIES LTD. AKOLA (IN LIQN.) THROUGH ITS OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT NAGPUR & 2 OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. Bharti Dangre, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Srinivas Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Shri N. L. Jaiswal, Advocate H/F Advocate Shri L.H. Kothari for Respondent nos.2 & 3. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 27th November, 2009. 1. Learned Advocate for the appellant states that the appellant is ready to go with the hearing of OLR No. 62 of 2003, and therefore, she has instructions not to press this appeal which is accordingly disposed of. 2. This would enable the appellant to offer on 2 different parcels of property, and acceptance thereof shall always depend upon learned Company Judge’s acceptance thereof. 3. Steno copy be supplied as per rule. JUDGE JUDGE |Muley|