1 CA 384/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 384 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 554 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Dinesh Kadam i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 8TH DECEMBER 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Revision application has been admitted. In my view, a prima facie case for stay of the proceedings of the suit is made out. Admittedly, the respondent-plaintiff is a member of the petitioner no.2 society. The petitioner no.1 is also a member of the petitioner no.2 society. Thus the dispute is between a member and the 2 CA 384/10 society or a member and another member. The question of jurisdiction of a civil court would be required to be decided at the hearing of the revision application. Hence, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b). (D.G. KARNIK, J.)