THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.1842 OF 2011 DATED 3RD DECEMBER, 2011 BETWEEN M/s.Vamshi Industries Limited, (A company regd. Under India Companies Act) Having its Regd. Office at Sreenagar, Anaparthi – 533 342, E.G.District, Rep. by its Managing Director N.Ramakrishna Reddy. …Petitioner And Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.1842 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner, M/s.Vamshi Industries Limited, assails the action of the Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited (AP Transco) in not paying its outstanding bills for the power supplied by it to the AP Transco, even after the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5990 of 2006 and seeks a consequential direction to the AP Transco to clear the said outstanding bills. In their counter, the respondents stated that the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, being the authority competent to ﬁx the tariﬀ, had already been approached by way of an application ﬁled by the Distributing Companies on 23.08.2010 and that the issue was pending consideration. They therefore stated that until necessary orders were passed by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, the petitioner was not entitled to seek payment of any balance amount. Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri A.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submitted that in the light of the order dated 08.08.2011 passed by the Supreme Court in I.A.No.2 in Civil Appeal No.5990 of 2006, stating to the eﬀect that it saw no reason to clarify the order dated 26.05.2010, the petitioner company would also have to await the decision of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission as stated by the respondents in their counter. Learned counsel sought liberty for his client to approach the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission in this regard to put forth its case. Liberty is granted as sought for. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J. 3RD DECEMBER, 2011. VGSR/PGS