IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2009 / 29TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1912 of 2009(C) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): -------------------- T.V. BHASKARAN, NO.32, DEEPAM KANHIRODE, KOODALI P.O., KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KANNUR. 2. M/S SUNIL & COMPANY, NO.83, THIRUPPALLI STREET, WALL TAX ROAD, CHENNAI -79 GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 1912 OF 2009 (C) ==================== Dated this the 19th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The complaint of the petitioner is regarding the delay on the part of the 1st respondent in passing orders on Ext.P5 application for renewal of permit in respect of jeep bearing Regn.No.KL 11 E 7929. Petitioner submits that by Ext.P6, he also filed a declaration that he could not produce the no objection certificate of the 2nd respondent inspite of a request made in this behalf. It is stated that despite having filed Ext.P6, the 1st respondent is not passing orders on Ext.P5. The grievance of the petitioner being as above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5, issuing notice to the 2nd respondent also. Orders shall be passed on Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp