SBCrlm 5th bail appl.No.3144/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.5th BAIL APPLICATION NO.3144/2010. Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : July 8, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri J.K. Singhi for petitioner. Shri G.S. Rathore PP for the State. ****** No new argument has been advanced except the fact that one accused Pooran, who was absconding and who was being proceeded again under Section 299 Cr.P.C. has now been arrested. Trial would now take longer time. Learned counsel also referred to the statements of Ram Kalyan-PW1, Hariram-PW2, Dhanraj-PW3 and Murarilal-PW4 and argued that petitioner alone is not responsible for causing fatal injury to deceased Hariram Nagar, who also caused a knife blow on the stomach. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that all these arguments were also considered and rejected by this Court in earlier bail application especially the fourth bail application, which was rejected vide order dated 1/6/2007. It is submitted that SBCrlm 5th bail appl.No.3144/10. 2 joining of the new accused would not be as such delay the trial as the prosecution would be relying on the already recorded statements as far as examination-in-chief is concerned. He would only get the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses. Having regard to the fact that on merits of the case, bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court not once but on as many as four occasions, fact that new accused has been joined, would not be a reason to reconsider the earlier view. In view of above therefore, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail application is accordingly rejected. Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest keeping in view the fact that this is an old matter and petitioner is behind bar for a long time. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil