IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1479 of 2008 ROHIT KUMAR, BAKRI DELHA, VIJAY BIGHA, DELHA, GAYA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 23.04.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has prayed for quashing order taking cognizance dated 2.11.2007, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Delha Police Station case no. 90/2006 u/s 341,302,504/34 I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the FIR itself it is alleged that two other accused persons opened fire injuring two persons, whereas allegation against the petitioner is of snatching golden chain from the informant’s uncle. Furthermore, he has been implicated in this case on account of previous land dispute. Thus he submits that no offence against him would be made out under section 307 I.P.C. Submission of counsel for the petitioner is misconceived as cognizance is taken for offence and not against any individual person. The instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to press this point at the time of framing of charge. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)