IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21598 of 2011 Vidya Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 06.07.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The application is for modification of order dated 04.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4087 of 2011. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail on 04.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4087 of 2011 in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2010 with stipulation to release the petitioners after verifying the fact that the petitioners are not party to Mahadanama. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during consideration of anticipatory bail of petitioners on 04.03.2011 in Cr. Misc. No. 4087 of 2011 by mistake submission was made that petitioner was not a party to agreement for sale through the money alleged to have been received by father of accused Vijay Rai who actually executed agreement for sale. It is further submitted that the Mahadanama is forged and fabricated one and no one has taken money from the informant but it is 2 contended by other side that the petitioners are also party to Mahadanama and Title Suit No. 06 of 2010 is pending between the parties with regard to same dispute. Considering the fact that title suit is pending between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a further period of six weeks from today in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Sasaram, District- Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The order dated 04.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4087 of 2011 stands modified to the extent indicated above. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)