IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1367 of 2008 1. PRAMOD SINGH @ BARUN KUMAR 2. AJAY KUMAR SINGH @ AJAY KUMAR @ ANIL KUMAR @ ANIL KUMAR SINGH 3. DIGAMBAR SINGH …PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. AMENDRA KUMAR RAMN …OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioners : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ----------- 02. 22.07.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 23.10.2008, passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.III, Khagaria in Sessions Case No.152/06. By the said order, their application under section 227 of Cr. P.C. seeking discharge has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that going by the injury sustained by the injured, namely, Dhiraj Kumar, it cannot necessarily be inferred that petitioners had intention to kill. Learned trial court found certain injuries sustained by the victim/injured as dangerous to life. On consideration of materials on record, it has been found that they justify framing of charge(s) under section 307/34 IPC and proceed with the trial. This Court does not find any patent illegality in the order meriting interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )