IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 3936 of 2000 Between: T.Nagendrakumar S/o.Narasimha Rao Karkapur Prakasam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of A.P Rep.by its Prl.Secretary,Home Dept., Secretariat Hyderabad. 2 The Director General & Inspector General of Police,Govt.of A.P Hyderabad. 3 The A.P.Admn Tribunal Rep.by its Registrar Purani Haveli Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the action of the respondents in not prompting the petitioner as Addl.Suptd.of Police despite availability of vacancies as arbitrary, illegal, violating Article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and further declare the interim orders of the Hon'ble Tribunal dt.29-2-2000 in O.A.No.755/2000 as arbitrary, illegal and issue consequential directions directing the respondents to consider and promote the petitioner as Addl.Suptd. of Police forthwith in the existing vacancies pending disposal of the O.A.., and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3936 of 2000 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) None appears for the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the interim order, dated 29.02.2000, passed in O.A.No.755 of 2000 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and no stay was granted by this Court. Due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 05.08.2008 v v