* + Ofo 0) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3920/2011 SUMIT GUPTA & ORS. Through . .... Petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Mr. Piyush Gupta, Advs. for P-1 to 6 with P-1 to 6 in person. versus STATE CORAM: Mr. Ajay Garg, Adv. for P- 7 /complainant with P-7 in person. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Rajni Chopra, PS CWC Nanakpura. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 28.11.2011 Crl.M.A. 184 77/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3920/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 11/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS CWC, New Delhi. The Petitioner No. 7/complainant Ms. Kirti Jain @ Kirti Gupta is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of CRL.M.C. 3920/2011 page 1 of 3 -: --.!.. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 6) • the settlement, statement with regard to first motion of divorce has been recorded. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Petitioner No.7, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid Rs. 70 lakhs out of which Rs. 45 lakhs have already been paid to her and Rs. 25 lakhs are lying deposited in the form of FDR before the learned Trial Court. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their '--!.. differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance. of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings ;-I pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 11/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS ewe, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. -The Petitioner No.7/complainant will be entitled to receive the amount of Rs. 25 lakhs along with the interest that may have accrued thereon lying before the learned Trial Court in the form of FDR, after the recording of the CRL.M.C. 3920/2011 page 2 of 3 --.!.. statement of second motion for divorce by mutual consent. cD Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 28, 2011 'ga' I .i. w ':D \I !!. t; \"' 6'(_ '7 L CRL.M.C. 3920/2011 page3 of3