IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6896 of 2011(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- KURIAN P.ISSAC, PAREKKARA HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SMT.G.CHITRA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-685 602. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI, PIN-685 602. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ........................................... W.P.(C).NO.6896 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 4th day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT Exts.P1 and P2 are two applications made by the petitioner for regular permit on the route Kumaly - Ernakulam and Ernakulam-Kumaly. The first respondent considered the application and by Ext.P3 it was ordered to seek concurrence of Secretary RTA. Exts.P4 to P7 shows that Secretary RTAs have already granted their concurrence. 2. Complaint of the petitioner is that despite having obtained Exts.P4 to P7 concurrences, the first respondent has not so far passed final orders on Exts.P1 and P2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned Government Pleader. In view of Ext.P3 proceedings of the first respondent and also Exts.P4 to P7 concurrences obtained, all that is required is that the first respondent should pass final orders on Exts. P1 and P2 applications. This the first respondent shall do as early as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. cl