IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17594 of 2009 LAXMI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 27.07.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 302 IPC. As per the F.I.R., the deceased was done to death by five unknown criminals by fire arm. Informant, who has subsequently been added as an accused, has named two accused persons namely Ram Sagar Yadav and Gajo Yadav in the F.I.R. alleging that on the previous day, they were seen close to the place of occurrence. It is reflected from the F.I.R. itself that the deceased was done to death because of the fact that he was selling lands in bits and pieces which was not liked by the inmates. Result of the investigation is that informant of the case is also facing prosecution. So far as the present petitioner is concerned, it is contended that the only material available against him is that few day prior to occurrence, he had purchased 6 kathas 8 dhurs of land from the deceased. It is further contended that he is in custody since 18.12.2008. Learned APP, looking to the case diary, accepts this position. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Rosera, in connection with Hasanpur (Bithan) P.S. case no. 155 of 2006. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )