3 -cfiamas^ ^'^J. "'''^•?.. .^y-!, '? i ^». 1s 8--^-c^&> 8 'SsSSssSSS, s L{0 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Tax Case No. 23 of 2008 Versus Depuly CoTnTnissioner of Incoine Tax - 1(1), RaipuT (C.G.) M/s. Goel Brofhers, Goel House, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) AppeUaat Respondent APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260 OFTHE INCQME_TAXACT, 1961 DB: Hon'ble Shri I. M. Quddusi 85 Hon'ble Shri N. K. Agarwal, JJ Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Standiag Counsel for the applicaut. Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the respondent. OR&L ORDER (Passed on fhis 19th day ofAugust, 2010) Per I. M. Quddusi, J. This iD.coine tax appeal has been filed by fhe Revenue against fhe order dated 15.2.2008 passed by the Inconie Tax AppeUate Tribunal, Bilaspiu- Circuit Bench, iu I.T.A. No. 143/N^./2007, for the Assessment Year 2004-05. Accordmg to the Instmction No. 5 of 2008 w.e.f. 15.5.2008 the inonetary Innit for fiting aii appeal was Rs. 4 Lacs. This appeal was filed on 22.7.2008. The tax, penalty, fine, iaterest denianded, counted togefherwere Rs. 2,49,088/-. Therefore, the appeal is not laamtainable. The same is disiuissed. No order as to costs. Thaktu- Sd/- I.M.Qiiddusi Judge Sd/- N.KAgarwal ludge