IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6779 of 2010 MD. REHAN ANSARI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 10.1.2011 Petitioners representation filed pursuant to the order passed by this Court in their earlier writ application, has been rejected by the District Magistrate Madhepura, by order dated 23.2.2010 as contained in Annexure-4, giving rise to this writ application, challenging the same. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they were selected for appointment as Home Guard, but the process was not completed and the appointment letters were not issued to them. The District Magistrate in his order has found that the S.P., Madhepura had not participated in the meeting of the Selection Committee and the earlier District Magistrate had not put his signature on the proceeding of the Selection Committee and therefore, the selection process was not over and the 2 petitioners were not entitled for appointment. Mere getting into a selection list does not create a right in the persons selected to get appointment. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that there was no recommendation also of the Selection Committee for appointment of the petitioners. The District magistrate has found some defects in the proceedings of the Selection Committee and therefore, he did not think it proper to approve the selection list and issue direction for appointment of the petitioners. This Court does not find any infirmity in decision of the District Magistrate and therefore, does not find any merit in the writ application, the same is dismissed. Prakash ( J.N.Singh, J.)