1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. APPLICATION NO.592 OF 2008. ( AMIT T. BHADRA S/O.DR.D.R.TRAPADA BHADRA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR,J. DATED : APRIL 04, 2008. 1. Heard Shri S.P.Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri A.S.Fulzele, learned A.P.P. for the respondent/ State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offence registered by Police Station Ranapratap Nagar, Nagpur vide Crime No.324/2007 under Sections 420, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It is categorical statement of the applicant that there was MOU with Mysore University regarding conducting of MBA 2 Course. However, due to some administrative difficulties, the students who were admitted, whose names were approved by Mysore University could not appear for the examination. The complaint was lodged by one Suhas Rajderkar, a student. It is also stated by the applicant that the fees collected from all the students have been refunded to them along with compensation and all these students, including this Rajderkar have now no grievance. Affidavits of some of the students to that effect have been filed on record. It, therefore, appears that the applicant has compensated the students who could not appear for the examination, despite they have taken admission to this course on the approval of Mysore University. 4. The learned A.P.P., while opposing this application, has contended that the Investigating Agency desires to have custody of the applicant for further investigation. It is, however, further contended that the Investigating Agency may conduct investigation if the applicant is directed to attend the Police Station. As such there is no difficulty in confirming the order which was passed on 14.02.2008. 3 As such, the order dated 14.02.2008 is hereby confirmed on the same conditions. 5. It is contended by the learned A.P.P. That the applicant be directed to attend Police Station for two days initially. 6. Accordingly the applicant is directed to attend the Police Station, for the purpose of investigation on 15th and 16th April, 2008, initially. 7. The Investigating Officer is directed to certify as to when the applicant has attended and duration of investigation and his attendance and the same may be informed to the Court. JUDGE RR.