IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7080 of 2011 PRAMOD SAH @ BABLU SAH @ PRAMOD KR. SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 31.03.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint which got subsequently registered as police case under Sections 304(B),201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Though there is allegation of demand of Rs. 25,000/- and motor cycle but it appears that the marriage was performed in 2002. The occurrence took pace on 09.04.2010 when the complainant admits in paragraph no. 7 of the complaint that on 09.04.2010 this petitioner informed the complainant about burnt injury of the victim and in paragraph no. 8 of the complaint she admits that the petitioner gave information about the death also to the complainant and then the complainant admits in paragraph no.9 of the complaint that she reached to the victim’s in-laws house when she found the dead body in burnt condition but it is 2 surprising that on 17.5.2010 complaint was filed. This unexplained delay clouds entire accusation. Considering the fact that the marriage was performed in 2002 and own admission of the complainant reflects certain elements of bonafide, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 121 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Purnia, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)