BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.11479 of 2011 1. KUMAR 2. GANAPATHY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH MADURAI, CR.NO.65/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- There are two petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first petitioner has already been arrested and he does not press any order for the first petitioner. Therefore this petition is dismissed in respect of the first petitioner. The second petitioner is the ninth accused in crime No.65 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 419, 468, 471 and 120(B) IPC. Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police he is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution the de-facto complainant is the owner of the property. She mortgaged the property in favour of A1. Later on, she redeemed the same also. However, A1 impresonating the owner created a general power of attorney and based on the same, sold away the property to others. The second petitioner stood as a witness to the document. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the second petitioner is an illiterate woman. Without knowing the consequences. She stood as a witness for the document and she is a poor village woman the learned counsel contends. 4. Having regard to the fact that the second petitioner is a woman and that too an illiterate woman and having regard to the fact that the other accused had already been arrested and released. I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the second petitioner alone, but with conditions. 5. Accordingly, the second petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.I, Madurai on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police office who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ interrogation. As far as the first petitioner is concerned, this petition is dismissed. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. sd/- 13/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I MADURAI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI DISTRICT 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S.SIVASUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.35521 GH : 14.10.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11479 of 2011 Date :13/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/