$7 HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I‘TISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2095 of 2008 WRIT PE’I‘ITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnjhoui J.) Shli A. K, Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 85 3. Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDERmal) (Passed on this 16th day ofJuly, 2009) Heald. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instrucfions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this wi‘it petition on merits and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to take mcourse to the statutory appellate forum, that may be available to her, as provided under Section 77 of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Learned counsel appealing for the respondents have no objection. Having regard to the facts situation of the case, as the R.R.C. has already been issued pursuant to the order dated 15.10.2007 (Annexure R-2/9), passed by the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative I Petitioner Smt. Tetari Devi, W/o Late Ramchandra Singh, aged about 50 years, R/o New Khurshipar, Bengali Colony, Bhilai District Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through I ' Secretary, Department of Co—operative Societies, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G,) 2. Bhilai Nagrik Sahkari Bank, Bhilai, District Durg (C.Gr.) 3. The Tahsildar (Nazul), Durg, District Durg (C.G.) wanmm-w‘ a9; 2 @ Societies, Durg, in Case No. E-64/220/2006, the interim relief V‘ granted by this Com on 10.4.2008 shall continue for a period of two Weeks to enable the petitioner to $6 Judge 4. advised, and seek appropriate order from the appellate authority. The above observations shall not come in the way of the appellate 5. authority in taking decision, in accordance with law. In View of the above, the Wn't petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above state liberty. No older asto costs. Sd/- Thaim i Satish K. Agnihotri