SBCMA No.2127/07 Beema Nirikshak, Employees State Insurance Corp Vs. M/s. Aravali Minerals -{1}- SBCMA No.2127/07 Beema Nirikshak, Employees State Insurance Corp Vs. M/s. Aravali Minerals DATE OF ORDER : - 15.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.RK Soni, or the appellant. Mr.JS Rao, for the the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant is aggrieved against the order dated 12.4.2007 by which the ESI Court – Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) Sirohi granted concession to the respondent and ordered that in case the respondent deposits 50% of the demand amount then his case may be registered under Section 75 of the ESI Act. According to learned counsel for the appellant, the appellant raised demand and that has not been challenged in time and thereafter, when said demand sought to be executed then only this application under Section 75 of the SBCMA No.2127/07 Beema Nirikshak, Employees State Insurance Corp Vs. M/s. Aravali Minerals -{2}- ESI Act has been submitted by the respondent. It appears from the reasons given in the impugned order dated 12.4.2007 that the ESI Court carefully considered the facts of the case and, thereafter, granted his concession to the respondent-applicant. According to the appellants themselves the court vested that power to grant this concession. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order nor any reason for interfering in the said order dated 12.4.2007 while exercising appellate jurisdiction. Hence, the appeal of the appellant is dismissed having no merit. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-