1 cri-wp-2011-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2010 Mr. Dhanpal Tejraj Solanki .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr. .. Respondents Mr. A.M. Saraogi for petitioner. Mr. Y. S. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. June 29, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr. Saraogi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the purported statement of Shri Jagdish @ Lalwa Radheshyam Saroj recorded by the police on 31/5/2006. We have also perused the affidavit-in-reply filed by Shri Suresh Madane, Assistant Police Inspector from Special Protection Unit, Mumbai. 2 cri-wp-2011-10 2. This petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution prays for further investigation by taking into consideration the alleged confessional statement dated 31/5/2006 of Jagdish Saroj. After going through the said statement, it was submitted by Mr. Saraogi that Shri Suresh Jadhav, brother of Shri Shantaram Jadhav, was required to be impleaded as a co-accused in C.R. No. 291 of 2005 which came to be investigated into by the GB CB, CID. 3. We have given our anxious considerations to the said statement dated 31/5/2006 and it does not make out a case to investigate the complicity at least against Shri Suresh Jadhav in the incident i.e. the house breaking of Dhanlaxmi Jwellers on 8/9/2005. 4. Hence, the petition is rejected. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)