1 cr-appa-183-10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN. NO. 183 OF 2010 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 96 OF 2010 Shri. Aditya Anilkumar Gupte ..Applicant Vs. Mah. State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondent .... Mr. T.K.Sinha Adv. for applicant Smt. A.R.X.Baxi Adv. for respondent no.1 Mr. Rajesh More APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : OCTOBER 19 , 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for M.S.D.C.-respondent no.1 and the learned APP for the State. 2 The applicant has been convicted for the offence under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The applicant has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5 lakhs i/d to suffer S.I. for three months. The appeal 2 cr-appa-183-10 preferred by the applicant is pending. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3 The learned advocate for the applicant states that the applicant is not involved in any other case. He further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. These statements have not been controverted by the respondent no.1. 4 Looking to the evidence on record and above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5 The applicant- Aditya Anilkumar Gupta be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. fifteen thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The in default sentence is suspended on the applicant depositing Rs.1 lakh within five weeks from today before the trial Court. It is made clear that if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated time, this order granting bail shall stand automatically vacated. 6 Application disposed of. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]