IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3582 of 2011 SANTOSH CHOWDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -------- 02/ 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and admittedly, his marriage had taken place three years ago with the deceased and after marriage the above stated couple was blessed with a child. It appears from perusal of the first information report that prior to the alleged occurrence, a dispute of partition arose between the petitioner and brother of petitioner and in the aforesaid partition dispute informant intervened but he was humiliated by the family members of the petitioner. Subsequently, one Ganesh Choudhary informed the informant about alleged occurrence and after that informant went to Jehanabad Sadar hospital where he saw the dead body of the deceased. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the deceased committed suicide as at the time of dispute of the partition some hot exchange of words had taken place between the family members of the petitioner as well as informant and being annoyed with the aforesaid incident, the deceased committed suicide. It is pointed out by him that the police after due investigation submitted charge sheet under section 306 of the IPC. It is also pointed out by him that after above stated incident the deceased was not only brought to the hospital by the petitioner as well as his other family - 2 - members but the informant was also properly informed by brother of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Santosh Chowdhary, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Pali P.S. Case no. 46 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)