IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.3277 of 2009 Date of Decision : 09.09.2009 U.H.B.V.N.L. and others ...Appellants Versus Jagdish Chander Bajaj ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. K.S.Malik, Advocate, for the appellants. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendants are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, arising out of a suit for declaration challenging disconnection of electric supply consequent to checking of the meter on 16.9.2005. The learned first Appellate Court has found that the meter removed from the premises of another consumer, was installed in the factory premises of the plaintiff. However, there is no evidence that such meter was verified to be giving correct reading, as no report from the laboratory has been produced. It has been rightly found that the meter installed in the factory premises of the plaintiff on 8.6.2005 was the defective meter, for which default, the supply of the plaintiff could not be disconnected pursuant to checking done on 16.9.2005. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, which may give rise to any substantial question of law for consideration of this Court in second appeal. Dismissed. 09.09.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE