IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2011 / 22ND POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 1198 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN LAA.198/2005 Dated 25/09/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT: ---------------------- SECRETARY, KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP, SC, KSIDC RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. KAPPAN SHAMSUDHEEN, S/O.KAPPAN BACKER, PANAKKAD, KOLMANNA, HAJIYARPALLI, MALAPPURAM( POWER OF ATTORNEY) 2. NAFEESA (MOTHER) 3. ALI 4. YOUSUF 5. SUBAIDA 6. SEENATH 7. ATHIKKA 8. MOHAMMED ABDUL HAKEEM 9. AYISHABI 10. ARIFA 11. SAHIRA 12. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR FOR R1 TO 11 GOVT. PLEADER FOR R12. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. .................................................................... R.P. No.1198 of 2008 in L.A.A. No.198 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 12th day of January, 2011. ORDER Ramachandran Nair, J. Review Petition is filed against judgment of the Division Bench holding that respondents are entitled to interest on solatium. This court while deciding the matter only followed a judgment of the Supreme Court in SUNDER VS. UNION OF INDIA reported in 2001(3) KLT 489. Review petitioner has not pointed out any judgment contrary to the position laid down in the above judgment based on which appeal was dismissed. Further, it is stated that interest on solatium is already paid to the respondents. We, therefore, do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment in review. Consequently Review Petition is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge HARUN-UL-RASHID Judge pms