IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39955 of 2008 ALIMUDDIN @ GAMA S/o late Sk. Tasnif Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 24.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. On the confessional statement of the co-accused, who has already been granted bail by this Court, petitioner’s name has come. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is also allowed. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. 7, Purnea in connection with S.T. No. 515 of 2008 (in Baisi P.S. Case no. 92 of 2004). shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)