WP/344/2010/Group 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 344 OF 2010 WITH WP/676/2010 WITH WP/713/2010 WITH WP/2228/2010 WITH WP/2702/2011 WITH WP/3015/2011 WITH WP/3155/2012 WITH WP/3161/2012 WITH WP/4384/2014 WITH WP/4423/2011 WITH CA/3060/2015 IN WP/4423/2011 WITH WP/4427/2011 WITH WP/4454/2014 WITH WP/4455/2014 WITH WP/4456/2014 WITH WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/3199/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/8876/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/8877/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/8878/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/8880/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/8879/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH CA/8881/2012 IN WP/6693/2010 WITH WP/7072/2014 WITH WP/7210/2014 WITH WP/7499/2011 WITH WP/8898/2011 WITH RA/201/2014 IN WP/8898/2011 WITH WP/8899/2011 WITH RA/199/2014 IN WP/8899/2011 WITH WP/8900/2011 WITH RA/200/2014 IN WP/8900/2011 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURE & RURAL MULTIPURPOSE DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. VERSUS NILKANTH BHAGWANTRAO DESHMUKH & ORS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Shri N.N.Jagdale h/f Shri V.D.Salunke, Shri S.N.Boiwar h/f Shri S.V.Dankh, Shri K.J.Suryawanshi and Shri V.S.Badakh Advocate for Respondents : Shri Girish Rane, Shri R.B.Deshmukh, Shri M.P.Tripathi, Shri P.V.Barde, Shri Abhijit Choudhari h/f Shri D.J.Choudhari and Shri A.S.More. ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: July 03, 2015 ... PER COURT :- 1. By an order dated 5.7.2012, this Court had permitted the litigating sides to submit their Written Notes of Arguments. Shri Girish Rane, learned Advocate has filed his Written Notes of Arguments along with compilation WP/344/2010/Group 2 of reports, on which he places reliance. 2. The learned Advocates for the respondents in all these matters are adopting the same Written Notes of Arguments and the reports cited. They insist on the hearing of these petitions. 3. Several learned Advocates appear for the litigating sides in these matters. On more than 7 to 8 occasions, these matters have been adjourned. On 16.6.2015, a request was made on behalf of the petitioners for an adjournment. Even today, the learned Advocate for the petitioners is busy in some matters before other Courts. 4. In the light of the above, liberty is granted to the learned Advocate for the petitioners Shri Salunke to file Written Notes of Arguments and cite case law if any. One of the petitioners in Writ Petition No.8499 of 2011 has already filed Written Notes of Arguments, so also the respondents. 5. In the light of the grave urgency and insistence put forth by the respondents that the matter is being adjourned on many occasions, learned Advocates for the petitioners are expected to submit their Written Notes of Arguments on/or before 17.7.2015 without seeking further extension. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ... akl/d