IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18607 of 2009 BASERAN, wife of late Md. Sayak, resident of village-Bara Rahuwa, P.S.- Amour, District-Purnea ----------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 1.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Deceased is daughter of the informant. She was second wife of Md. Sayak. Petitioner is said to be the first wife of Md. Sayak. In defence it is said that witnesses including one son of the deceased are there in the case diary to state that she was not killed rather left village with her sister. A dead body was recovered in a gunny bag and is said of the deceased. There may be some substance that the dead body was not of the deceased but there is none to disclose as to whose that dead body was. Otherwise also, F.I.R. is lodged basing the statement of the deceased’s daughter who has narrated the story to her grand-father (Nana) though about taking away her by the petitioner including others. That is corroborated by finding of the dead body and further that is corroborated by that girl’s statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that also after three months and for these three months defence succeeded to keep her away from the investigating officer. Thus, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Prayer of the petitioner is rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )