1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.2842 OF 2008. (JAISINGH A. YADAO & OTH. Vs STATE OF MAH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Sudeep Jaiswal, Advocate for Applicants. Shri A.S.Sonare, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI, J. DATED : AUGUST 28, 2008. 1. According to the applicant, the story of attempt of kidnapping is false. He however, does not dispute his presence on the scene of offence and says that it is out of love affair that he was passing by the side of motor vehicle TATA Sumo, by his Indica car, the complainant's father has built the said story. 2. Be that as it may, unfortunately, for the applicants, statements of witnesses support the version of the F.I.R. lodged by the girl, who according to the applicant, is in love with him, yet has filed the complaint. 3. On what reveals from the case diary, the applicant is involved in the offence complained of. The truthfulness or falsehood of the complainant has to be decided after investigation is complete. 2 4. The applicant, therefore does not have case for anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. JUDGE RR.