IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1403 of 2009 1. Dilip Kumar, son of Late Sidheshwar Prasad. 2. Tuntun Kumar, son of Lal Mohan Yadav, Both resident of Village- Lodipur, P.S. Naubatpur, District- Patna ……………………………..Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar …………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 03. 03. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 26/2008, registered under Sections 363, 366 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioners are maternal uncle of co- accused Niraj Kumar. It is further submitted that other accused persons including the co-accused Niraj Kumar had caught Sintu Kumari (daughter of the informant) and by giving threatening to the informant and other left the place with the minor girl Sintu Kumari. The statement of Sintu Kumari was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. who also filed petition on 19. 5. 2008 in the court below stating that she was not kidnapped rather she voluntarily solemnised marriage with Niraj Kumar. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners namely, Dilip Kumar and Tuntun Kumar shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of - 2 - Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 26 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Sub Section 2 of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)