IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5194/2010 JAIHIND KRIDA VYAM PRACHARAK AND SANSKRUTIK SANSTHA & ORS ..VS.. STATE OF MAH AND OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 18, 2011. Heard Shri Bhuyar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sharma, the learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Mrs. Deshpande, the learned AGP for the respondent no.1 & 2. It appears that the impugned order dated 4.5.2010 is challenged by the petitioner on the facts which are seriously disputed by the respondents. Even otherwise, it appears on hearing the learned counsel for the parties that the impugned order passed by the Collector, is appellable under the provisions of section 137 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, since the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the Commissioner under the provisions of section 137 of the Act. Hence, for the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP