1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 274 OF 2009 WITH MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 650 OF 2009 Shri Sadanand Gopinath Kanekar through Attorney Dayanand Sadanand Kanekar ... Petitioner versus Shri Pratapsingh Rauji Rane and others. ... Respondents Shri D. P. Bhise, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Shaikh Vahidulla, Advocate for Respondent No.1/Caveator. Coram: N. A. BRITTO, J. Date : 7th July, 2010. P.C.:- Heard. This Writ Petition is directed against Order dated 21-1-2009 by which the learned Administrative Tribunal dismissed the revision filed before it against the Order condoning the delay in filing the appeal before the Deputy Collector, against an Order passed by the Mamlatdar dated 28-9-1995 under Section 18-C of the Tenancy Act, 1964, as amended. Learned Counsel on behalf of both the parties now inform the Court that the said appeal by the Deputy Collector has been decided on merits, and against the decision of the Deputy Collector an appeal has been filed before the 2 Administrative Tribunal, in which written arguments have been filed, and a decision is awaited on 29-7-2010. Considering the facts of the case, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the Order dated 21-1-2009 of the learned Administrative Tribunal, along with the Order of the Administrative Tribunal, on merits of the case, in case the same is adverse to the Petitioner. The statement is accepted. This Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the Order dated 21-1-2009 of the Administrative Tribunal along with the Order of the Administrative Tribunal which will be passed in the said appeal in case the same goes adverse to the Petitioner. Petition/application disposed off accordingly. Parties to appear before the learned Administrative Tribunal on 29-7-2010 on which day the said appeal on merits is fixed for orders. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD