IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9368 of 2008. Decided on 13th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Sanjay Kumar. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate petition before appropriate Forum, in accordance with law. It is made clear that the question of limitation will not come in the way of the petitioner since he has been pursuing the remedy before this Court, in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. [ (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 13, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `