IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 782 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 8, 2010 Union of India and others …Appellants Versus Ex Rectt. Sukhchain Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Sr. Panel Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 9.10.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 4948 of 2007. The learned Single Judge has placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Union of India v. Ex Sepoy Ranjit Singh (LPA No. 547 of 2001, decided on 11.2.2009). The issue raised and decided in the aforesaid appeal was that the invalidation on account of Generalised Seizure was found to be attributable or aggravated by military service and consequently the disabled army personnel was found entitled to disability pension. The aforesaid factual and legal position was not seriously disputed by the Union of India. Accordingly, the writ petition has been allowed. Feeling aggrieved, the Union of India has approached this Court by filing the instant appeal. Having heard learned counsel, we find no distinguishable facts LPA No. 782 of 2010 warranting admission of the appeal. The matter is covered by the judgment of the Letters Patent Bench in Ex Sepoy Ranjit Singh’s case (supra). Consequently, it is held that the disability of the petitioner was attributable to military service and he is entitled to military pension from the date of discharge from military service in terms of the report of the Medical Board. In view of the above, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) July 8, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2