1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.15552 OF 2008. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C. VS RAJU S/O MANOHARRAOJI CHANGOLE Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri V. G. Wankhede, Advocate for the appellants. Shri B. N. Mohota, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 25th November, 2009. 1. Heard Learned Advocate Shri V. G. Wankhe for the appellant and learned Advocate Shri B. N. Mohota for the respondent. 2. The evidence of the claimant was tested to cross examination. There was no rebuttal evidence whatsoever brought before the Tribunal by the appellant. 3. The Tribunal held that the impact of the accident between Car and the S. T. Bus was heavy, resulting into the fatal accident. The rash and negligent driving of the driver of the Bus was proved. The evidence of the claimants relating to loss of income and dependant also gone unchallenged. 2 4. In the result, the Tribunal held that the present appellant MSRTC is responsible for payment of compensation. 5. In these premises, there is not a single ground available for the appellant for challenging the award. The challenge has no merit and foundation. 6. Appeal is dismissed being without merit. JUDGE JUDGE |Muley|