[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.546 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO.490 OF 2008 1. Gajanan Manohar Mayekar 2. Surendra Mahadeo Vayangankar Both r/o Danda, Tal.Shriwardhan Dist.Raigad ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.A.A.Kocharekar Advocate for Applicants Mr.U.V.Nikam APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 04, 2008 DATE : JUNE 04, 2008 DATE : JUNE 04, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The learned advocate for the applicants submitted that the applicants were on bail during the trial and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. The learned advocate for the applicants further submitted that the maximum sentence imposed on the applicants is [-2-] two years and the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said time. 3. Looking to the above facts and the evidence, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. 4. Each of the applicants i.e. the applicant No.1-Gajanan Manohar Mayekar and applicant No.2-Surendra Mahadeo Vayangankar to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.twenty thousand only) each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount during the pendency of the appeal. The applicants to report to Shriwardhan police station, once in a fortnight till the disposal of the appeal. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]