IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 Mat.Appeal.No. 79 of 2008() --------------------------- OP.415/2005 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN OP ----------------------------------- 1. RAJU.V.B., S/O.BHANU, AGED 36 YEARS, VATTAMODIYIL VEEDU, ERUMAKKODE P.O., EDAYARANMULA MURI, ARANMULA MURI, ARANMULA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK. 2. K.K.BHANU, AGED 67 YEARS, FATHER OF RAJU.V.B., VATTAMODIYIL VEEDU, ERUMAKKODE P.O., EDAYARANMULA MURI, ARANMULA MURI, ARANMULA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO.3 IN O.P. --------------------------------------------------- 1. AMBALIKA, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O.RAJAMMA, MAMMOOTTIL VEEDU, NADUVILE MURI, NEDUMPURAM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK. 2. RAMANI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O.K.K.BHANU, VATTAMODIYIL VEEDU, ERUMAKKODE P.O., EDAYARANMULA MURI, ARANMULA MURI, ARANMULA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR SRI.T.P.PRADEEP THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN I.A. NO. 316 OF 2008 IN MAT. APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2008. DISMISSED 8.4.2008 Sd/-(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sd/-(HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------------------- MAT. APPEAL NO.79 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. This is an appeal filed by respondents 1 and 2 in O.P. No.415 of 2005 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvalla. Thanks to the co- operation extended by counsel on both sides, the parties have settled the claims as arising in this case. As part of the settlement, the second appellant, father of the first appellant has paid an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the first respondent and she has duly acknowledged the same. In view of the settlement as above, it is submitted that the appeal can be closed. 2. Since the parties have no other claims in respect of the decree in O.P. No.415 of 2005, it is submitted that the first respondent does not want to pursue M.C. No.7 of 2001 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court I, Thiruvalla. The above submission is recorded and M.C. No.7 of 2001 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court I, Thiruvalla is quashed. In view of the submission as above, the attachment ordered in I.A. No.1276 of 2005 in O.P. No.415 of 2005 is Mat. Appeal No.79/2008 2 lifted. In view of the settlement of the entire disputes as above, it is submitted that the first appellant proposes to move the Family Court for a decree of divorce. We make it clear that in the event of the first appellant moving the Family Court, the court may dispose of the matter expeditiously. The appeal is accordingly closed. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) sp/ Mat. Appeal No.79/2008 3 KURIAN JOSEPH & HAURN-UL-RASHID, JJ. M.A.NO.79 OF 2008 JUDGMENT 8TH APRIL, 2008