IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.997 of 2008 Date of decision: February 18, 2008. Union of India ...Petitioner(s) v. Ginder Singh ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the Union of India against the order dated 28.5.2001 passed by the Executing Court – cum – Additional District Judge, Bhatinda. As the record reveals, the Revision Petition was filed on 25.11.2005, however, was returned by the Registry on that very day with certain objections. The same has now been re-filed along with an application for condonation of delay of 2 years and 2 months in re-filing thereof. It may be true that the Revision Petition having been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution, the strict provisions of the Limitation Act may not be attracted, however, the petitioner is obligated to explain the inordinate delay in approaching this court. In the absence of even a whisper, what to talk of any cogent explanation, no case to interfere with the impugned order, at this stage, is made out. Dismissed. Consequently, no orders are required to be passed on the application for condonation of delay. February 18, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge