HK3H COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRI RAJEEVGUPTA,CJ. HON'BLESHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Applicants Claimants Non-apBlicants MCT; N0462 of2009 1. Smt. Jasbir KaurWdft) SarelarBaldev Singh Dhunna aged about 28 years residentofChoukiBangalaStation Road, Rajnandgaon at present R/o Through Sardar temel Singh s/o Sardar Mangal Sihgh Cfty Stertton Pritam Bhawan Raipur (M.P.) Ku. Pinki S/o LaleSardar Baldev Singhagedabout2%years. Ku. Neetu D/o Late Sardar Baldev Singh aged about 8 years (dead) Appellarit No.2 Minor through Nalural GuarclianmotherSmt.Jasbirteur appellant No.1 both resktent ofStation Road, Rajnandgaon (M.P.) Versus Smt. Rajrani Gupta VWo Santosh l^imar Gupta aged about 40 yeare Truck No.S.P.8.6201, Owner Bhanupratappur Tahsil BhanupFatappurDiistrictJagdatpur (Bastar) Madhya Pradesh. Dashrath S/o Santuramaged about 23 yeare Truck N6. M.P.S. 6^)1 &Driver Saliya Para resident & Tahsll Bhanupratappur, District8astar(M.P.) United India Insurance ©ompany ThroughDivisionalManagerBhilai Akash Ganga Supela Bhilai District Durg, (M.P^ ^ f-. ^< 4. KuhMantKaurWd/OSarelarMukhtyar Stngh aged abart 55 years House Wtferesklent ofChouki Bangala Statipn Road Rajnandgaon, (M.P.) ApDlication for restoration 6f MA No.769/1988 Present: Shri ShaktiRajSinha, counselforthepetitioners. ORDER (ethNovenr*er,2009) The fodowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. ShriShaktf Raj Sinha, learned counsel fbr the petitionere is heard on I.A.No.01/2009, an an'Ncation Tor condonatlon of the delay in filing the restoration p^ltion. 2) On due consideration of the submtssions of leamed counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken In Nie application, we are satisfled that the petitionere have succeeded in showlng sufTicient causeforthedelayin flllng e re^orartlon petition. 3) I.A.No.01/2009, thereforejs atlowed and the delay tn filing •the restoration petltion Is hereby coiKloned. 4) Learned counsel for the petitioners te heard on the restoration petltion. 5) Thepetitioners are seeMng restoration (rf M.A.No.769/1996 which was dlsmissed for want of prosecution vkle wder dded 28.03.2008. 6) On due cbnsideration of the submteKWis of ttie teamed counsel for the pdltionera and the grounds taken in the aa 1 V^SSS^S^^^^^^^^:5??gla3iiS';s.^.@ subbu restoratlon petitton, we are satisfied that the abserffie of the petitloners' / appellants' counsel on 23.W.200S when M.A.No.769/1996 was taken-up for hearir®was based on fiona ffcfe grounds. 4) M.C.C.No.462/2009, therefbre, is allowed aml M.A. No.769/1996 is restored tote original number., Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/.. R.N. Chandi Judge ^ fv ^^