IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2062 of 2009 AJAY PAL, S/o Shri Ramdas Pal Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though he is the husband but there is no direct allegation on the point of demand and a case was lodged on the basis of complaint filed six days after the death only to bargain, but the allegation is specific regarding demand of motorcycle. In this case informant belongs to another village. He could know about the incident only after receiving the information and the filing of the case possible only verification of the information. No doubt, the case is lodged for the offence under Section 304B of I.P.C. and later, it appeared a case under Section 306 of I.P.C., but in both cases presumption is there. Petitioner is the husband and the death is within seven years of the marriage in the matrimonial house. Accordingly, the application is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial, if the case is committed for Sessions Trial. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)