/i1.^,^®y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BJLASPUR W.P. N0. 1049/2001 Shn Satish Tiwari, S/o. Late Shri S.S.Tiwari, aged 45 years, Occupation: Advocate, R/o. Jawahar Nagar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh Vs. TI^. 1. State of Chltattisgarh, through its Secretaiy, Higher Education Dept. Raipur, Chliattisgarh 2. CorpTnissioner Higher Education, Directorate, Chhatdsgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Additional Directdr, Higber Education. Department, Raipur, Bastar Division, Chliattisgarh, Raipur 4. Shri Saatanu Karmakar, Workiag as Lab Technician, Govemmetit P.G. CoUege, Jagdalpur 5. Shri Vijaya Shrivastava, Asstt. Professor, Departaient of Botajuy, Gtovemment P.G. College, Jagdalpur 6. Shri Ashok Kuniar Swamkar, Upper Division Clerk, Govenunent P.G.CoUege, Jagdalpur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri. J.l Shri Vishnu Koshta, couiisel fbr the petitioner. Shri S.K.Mishia, Panel Lawyer for the Stafe. (Passed ou thls 17th day of November 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner subinits fhat fhe reUef sought for ia fhis petition has already been satisfied by -T- ^^: the State/respondeuts. Thus, nofhiag survives ia this matter and this petition has becoine uifructuous. 2. Leamed couiisel appearing for the State does not controvert fhe same. 3. Consequenfly, the writ petition is disinissed, as havinj becoine iafructuous. Slia~.ina Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge