( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2828 OF 2010 Pandurang Laxman Jadhav PETITIONER VERSUS Maroti Gangaram Shelke & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. Satyajit Bora, advocate for the petitioner. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 18th June, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The application for framing issue regarding tenancy was rejected by the trial Court. The contention of the petitioner was that he had given the land which he had purchased from one of the brothers, on batai basis to one Ganpat Dada More. He stated in the written statement that such transaction of lease was effected on 23rd January, 2007. He, therefore, urged to frame issue regarding tenancy of the third party. The trial Court rejected the application. 3. The petitioner did not claim any tenancy right as such and he cannot agitate right of third party and cannot ( 2 ) insist for framing of such issue. No merits. The petition is dismissed. No costs. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp2828-10