IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHfi.TTIS ^^ie^i^-^^ AT BIIASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION/flO. '363,6 /2003 / w PETITIONER "'t < Ll^-T^ ^.>y .^y ^^ RESPONDENTS 2. liFlR^' D.K. Jain, aged about 48 yrs. son of Shri Mathur^m Jain, Sub Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Tandzila, resident of quarter No. H/0. J-3-04 Pragatinagar, Near Mabaraja Furniture, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.). VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, through : ;The Secretary, Departnent of Water Resources,, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Ral|>iir (C.G^). Englneer Department Resources, in of Sihava Chxef, Water Bbawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Executive Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Tandtila Water Resources Department, District Diirg (C.G.) ^ K.K. Chandrakar, Water Resources Department, Kondagaon, Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh). The Collector, District Durg (Chhattisgarh). n na ^sa-siS^ssSSK '»'®^s:Ka^K;:s35 :s?-':rKKi',5? V':W''3^'3::;{Bn^I^?g51^a^i]^t"ttH^<; ll*«llshtfW) ^....^,...............,;.,..,^^ iw'^. sn^rw 1?;it?3I§?I sti'Hl^i 't-fli.a •--»-;—• s^S e^fl^R^B^ 05;^2Q03 ; Smt/ Fouzkt AAirza, counse 1 for Miss Sharmila Singhai^&eputy •*l''4fri<fl-l '•tWdl'^' Ifl<[3t*Sl<~ .;-,-^ ^'SlJ'tPTSIlt?'-" - - "rtiie.petitioner. ^ .'/ '." .-••'. • '-^.i 6ovt, Advocttte for the State. i-1edrd bo+h-1'hecounsel. *' By Thiswrit petjtion underAi-flcle 226/227 oftheConstitutionof India, the petjtioner has challengeti dgtect 30.09.2003 hy'wHich^thepel-itionerhdsbeen tmnsferred from Sufc i&ivision.No.S, [;is1-rici-: t>ul'g:to^fc{(»nd<gaol'i, bisTriic-l-; Basfar.' The petitioner' is wprkihg a^ Resources Oepartrhent; SuK Gijyjsj^n No.S, Dypg, ouid he has been ii&sources Oepartrnent to Water (. ^. ,-•••'-••' • • " •• . ' '•. • -'•'.-, • ' •' •••'••• ' • • :: ": '.'•.'•''. •' '•• " s'i-r^i-:. Bastar".: i^i":v'-.': .' ^,1'':,; • ;. - transferred "fromj Tdnelula Wtt'tei" tesourc^: &e|®it'tB(^t,;|<SBn:|agaon^&| l-eqrTiedicounse|;|fOr|'tl'ii&;pel-i-tj^ transferan^.his.dau^^sar^^s^ at burg and if |'ar. which is dfar of place thatwitl tf'ie^petitioner'iistransferred to Bds put his family to lot of inconvefiienc^. She, further submitted that the petitioner may^e allowed to mdkea Deputy 6ovt. Advocate has no objecT! 1-laving heard the leapned c^unsel for the parties and having regar^ to the facts and circumstar|ces of the case, thie petitioner is allowed to make q detailed repres^ntation roising all his grieyancss within ten daysfromtoclcytoi^spo{)dentNo.2onctinturn, respondent^ ih& ^rfmsfw order. (Annexure P-1) Sub En^ineeir at .Tanclyta Wdter <)riei*:suNmits thdt fhjs is a mid •rerm ^epresentation to which the lear'ned lon. ^•^isii:'w,^»'a)wts,^{ayi'M%^ • SII^T^iI R^'ti.1* 3B^T 9ht ^ ^^ ^}^<JW ^fflyil ^ ^^ <f^T^l< iiarfgiian^ aii^rs'Riiwgfi^ w&hin d periotf of l^iirty days from objeetive mahnsriwjth areasoned No,2 shatl decicle'the^represehta't'ipn the date of pecsipt 6f the samew order. ' .;; . .. With the above obsepvdtionsl disposed of. . •' ^ ' ^ .' • 1:: ^In view of?]this0t<der, No.lQ4l6/2003alsos&ncldispQSeclc|f. Pdrties are ehtitled for cerfifi^d and clii'ections the^petition stahds AA.{W;')P.No.328t/2003 and I.A. ofthisorder, Sd/- LC.Bhados fc ^SI KSn VS. •ifsni^m^:'!—-— 1KB