The Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari C.R.P. Nos.4628 and 4657 of 2009 Date: 14.10.2009 Between: Dr. A.S.R. Gangadhara Rao .. Petitioner And The Indian Medical Association rep. by its Secretary B. Mohan Rao and others. ..Respondents The Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari C.R.P. Nos.4628 and 4657 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: Since the issue involved in both the revision petitions being the same, they are clubbed and disposed of by this common order. These two revision petitions are directed against the common order of the learned III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A. Nos.3394 and 4535 of 2008 in O.P. Nos. 1900 and 2589 of 2008, dated 16.6.2009. The petitioner filed the aforementioned O.Ps. before the trial Court under Section 23of the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act challenging the order of suspension and for declaring the termination of the membership of the petitioner from the 1st respondent-Association as illegal. In those O.Ps., he filed I.A. Nos. 3394 and 4535 of 2008 under Section 151 of C.P.C. seeking to suspend the operation of suspension order dated 13.8.2008 suspending the membership of the petitioner and stay of the operation of suspension order dated 30.10.2008 till the disposal of the main O.Ps. referred to above. The trial Court taking into account the fact that the main O.Ps. filed by the petitioner are still pending for enquiry, through the impugned order, declined to stay the operation of suspension order and termination of the membership of the petitioner and vacated the interim order of suspension granted earlier in I.A. No. 3394 of 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. Admittedly, the main O.Ps. filed by the petitioner are still pending for adjudication. In view of the fact that the trial Court passed the impugned order in exercise of its discretion, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. The revision petitions fail and they are accordingly dismissed. However, keeping in view the nature of the controversy involved, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the main O.Ps., namely, O.P.Nos. 1900 and 2589 of 2008, which are pending on its file, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 14th October, 2009 pnb