IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-34502 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.12.2011 Gurdev Kaur …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. HPS Ghuman, Advocate, for Union of India. Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. H.C. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 6. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman, learned counsel appearing for Union of India states that he has received instructions that bank account of the petitioner shall not be kept frozen and shall be released within a week. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has no concern with the property sold by the petitioner, therefore, department may deal with the property as it (department) wishes, in accordance with law. Present petition stands disposed of in the light of statements of learned counsel for the parties. ( Alok Singh ) December 9, 2011 Judge Anand