In the High Court of Uttaranchal, at Nainital. ( Stay Application No. 11172/2006) with Criminal W.P. No. 1093(M/B) of 2006 Balvinder Singh S/o Surjeet Singh, R/o Village Nashirpur @ Nastarpur, Tehsil Haridwar …. Petitioner. Vs. 1- State of Uttaranchal, 2- Station Officer, P.S. Kotwali, Jwalapur District Haridwar. 3- R. Rajender Nath Sakha Prabandhak, Corporation Bank Ranipur Moad, Haridwar District Haridwar .. Respondents. Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri D.K. Sharma, learned G.A. for the State. Coram: Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri Manish Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.K.Sharma, learned G.A. 2- By means of this writ petition the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- (i) To issue a writ or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the F.I.R. in case crime No. 372 of 2006, U/Ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar, contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 not to harass and arrest the petitioner in view of the impugned F.I.R. 3. On going through the first information report, challenged in this writ petition, it appears that there are allegations of defrauding the complainant Bank of Rs.4,61,000/-, by impersonation and fabricating forged papers, to obtain the loan. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere, in the investigation of the matter, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4- The writ petition is dismissed in limine. 5- The interim relief application also stands rejected. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) Dated: 31-8-2006 ISB