IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29956 of 2010 MUKESH YADAV @ MUKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.08.2010 Heard the counsel for the petitioner, Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar as well as the state. The allegation against the petitioner is that he opened fire on the informant causing injury on his right wrist. Further it is alleged that another accused gave stone blow on the informant as a result of which, he sustained injury. Subsequently, he was taken to hospital where he detected that Rs 8,000/- was missing from his pocket. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case u/S 394 of the IPC is made out from any angle of the fardbeyan. He drew my attention towards the impugned order and submitted that the informant has not received any fire-arm injury as mentioned by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge in the impugned order. The learned counsel for the state fairly conceded this fact. It would appear that learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda has clearly mentioned in the impugned order that the informant did not receive any fire are injury. So far as allegation of assaulting with 2 stone is concerned, the same is not againstr the petitioner. Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 109 of 2010 to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Nalanda at Biharsharif. AKV/ (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)