IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1995 of 2006 ALOK RANJAN KUMAR & ORS Versus SMT.SAVITA DEVI & ORS ----------- 2. 29/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. From the impugned order it appears that without any petition by any party and without hearing any party learned court below appointed the Circle Officer, Begusarai to measure the suit land and submit report with regard to its valuation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is for partition and the same is pending before learned Subordinate Judge, Begusarai, therefore, the suit valuation is not relevant before the suit is decreed by declaring the shares of respective coparceners and as learned Sub-Judge has unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain suits, question of jurisdiction of learned court below also does not arise. He further submits that there is no question of payment of ad valorem court fee. He also submits that the question of valuation of the land involved in the suit may arise only after decree is prepared, and for purposes of takhtabandi of shares of respective parties. - 2 - Be that as it may, since from the impugned order itself it appears that neither any petition was filed by any party for the purpose nor any party was heard, the order dated 14.8.2006 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the learned court below to hear the parties in the matter and then pass fresh orders, if necessary, in accordance with law. This revision application is thus disposed of. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)