BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9756 of 2011 CHINNAKUNCHAN @ ANBALAGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERALAM POLICE STATION, PERALAM, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.256/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.MURUGANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is sole accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.07.2011 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act 1985 in Crime No.256 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a case has been registered against his for the offence punishable offence under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act 1985. He further submitted that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 Kgs of ganja and he is in judicial custody and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by either side that the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.100 Kgs of ganja which is below the commercial quantity and as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ per the version of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, no other case is pending against the petitioner and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NANNILAM, TIRUVAROOR DIST 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVARUR 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGHCOURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERALAM POLICE STATION, PERALAM, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT, 5 THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, SUB JAIL, TIRUVARUR 1. CC to M/S. T.MURUGANATHAN Advocate SR.No.25621: DM::2011:AUGUST:03:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9756 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 2P:7C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/