IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2006 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1786 OF 2006 THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL ....Applicant EXCISE, PANAJI, GOA. Versus M/S. G. R. ISPAT LTD., CUNCOLIM, ....Respondent SALCETE, GOA. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. Samaant, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 3rd October, 2006 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the respondent. Perused the application and the affidavit in support of the said application. There is no affidavit of the respondent controverting the same. From the aforesaid application, it is seen that there is sufficient cause made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafides. Hence the delay of filing the above appeal is condoned. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ef.