IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22136 of 2011 Date of Decision: 29.11.2011 Paramjit Singh s/o Swaran Singh, resident of H.No.21-B, Model Town, Phagwara, District Kapurthala. ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary Home, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:Mr. R.S. Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks for police protection for an apprehended injury at an extraordinary General body meeting that has been called on a requisition in terms of Section 169 of the Companies Act. The petitioner is a shareholder and states that he has apprehensions about his safety. The person that calls the meeting is the Secretary and the meetings could be regulated by the Directors of the Company. A shareholder is not a person, who could have a basis for any complaint and if he has any apprehension, his remedy would be pursued with the police officials and would not come to Court for any directions. The petitioner states that he has also made a representation to the police but still they are not acting. I perceive this litigation to be luxurious. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. NOVEMBER 29, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE