IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4575 of 2011 1. ALIMUDDIN 2. JAITUM KHATOON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 364A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant's son went missing on 05.07.2009. Hence, the petitioners and others were named in the F.I.R. on suspicion. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the F.I.R. was lodged on 09.11.2009 for the occurrence of 05.07.2009. It is further submitted that the petitioners, being the agnates of the informant, were on inimical terms with the informant. Annexure-2 has been brought on record in support of the aforesaid contention. The telephone number through which the ransom call was made, has been located to be one of Santosh, which appears to have been verified by learned counsel for the 2 State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the case diary is available till 30.10.2010 only. Considering the suspicious nature of accusation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 261/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioners will be provisionally accepted which will be finally accepted on undertaking given by the petitioners before the learned court below that they will make themselves available as and when required by the investigating agency. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) 3