IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31999 of 2010 DINESH YADAV @ SRI DINESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused, namely, Sanjay Sah and others have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail and the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing to the above stated co-accused. It is also stated that none of the witness has made any allegation against the petitioner but from perusal of impugned ordered dated 05.08.2010, it appears that the learned Sessions Judge has mentioned the statements of some witnesses. Moreover, when other co-accused are enjoying, the privilege of anticipatory bail having similar allegation, I do not think it proper to distinguish the case of the petitioner from the aforesaid co-accused persons. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order, shall be released on bail in connection with Bihra P.S. Case No. 161 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Shahid/Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)