IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.197 OF 2004 Farooq S/o Riyazul … Revisionist Versus Family Judge, Family Court, Hardwar & two others … Respondents Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, learned Addl. G.A. for State/Respondent No.1 Sri Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 & 3 Dated: July 10, 2008 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the orders dated 9.9.2004 and 15.6.2004 passed by Judge, Family Court, Hardwar in Case No.02 of 2004. 2. Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision with the liberty to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the liberty is given to the revisionist to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Interim order dated 24.11.2004 stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.7.2008 Rajeev Dang