IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18119 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NOORJAHAN, DOOR NO.24/189, PATHADIPALAM, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. A.K.NAZAR, ANJIKKAD, PATHADIPALAM, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. SHRI M.K. ABOOBACKER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 18119 of 2010-L - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 representation which is pending from March, 2010. The allegation is that the unit to which permission was granted to the second respondent, is causing pollution. The allegation raised by the petitioner is that permit has been obtained by the second respondent by misrepresentation and fraud on the authorities. It is further pointed out that the construction made is not in tune with the Building Rules, viz. the required open space, parking area, etc. are not there. It is in these circumstances Ext.P.3 representation has been filed before the first respondent. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality. Since Ext.P3 is pending before the first respondent, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the matter with notice to the petitioner and the second respondent and take a final decision after due enquiry, within a wpc 18119/2010 2 period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/