IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 6060 of 2007(U) PETITIONER(S): 1. SURESHKUMAR, S/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 43, RESIDING AT T.C.10/1502(5) SURABHI, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. USHAKUMARI, W/O.SURESH, AGED 40, RESIDING AT T.C.10/1502(5), SURABHI, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.BABU GIREESAN RESPONDENT(S): 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, BANKING DIVISION, NEW DELHI. 2. M/S.PANJAB & SIND BANK, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. 3. SRI.B.RAJASEKHARAN NARI, GOVT.CONTRACTOR, DEVI BHAVAN, PALLICHAL P.O., NEMOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SRI.K.MOHANACHANDRAN NARI, T.C.10/1368-1, VATTIYOORKKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 013. 5. SMT.PREMALATHA P.M., T.C.10/1368-1, VATTIYOORKKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695013. 6. SMT.HYMAVATHESWARY AMMA, T.C.10/1369-1, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695013. 7. SRI.K.HEMACHANDRAN NAIR, T.C.10/1368-1, VATTIYOORKKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 013. 8. SMT.DEVI R NAIR ALIAS DEVAKI, W/O.B.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, DEVI BHAVAN, PALLICHAL P.O., NEMOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 020 ADV. SRI. JOHN VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 6060 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 23rd May, 2009. J U D G M E N T This writ petition was admitted and interim order granted on 22- 2-2007. Notice was ordered to the respondents. But, the petitioners have not paid process. Therefore, the writ petition was posted in the defect list on 22-5-2009, on which date, I passed the following order: “Although notice was ordered in the writ petition on 22.2.2007, the petitioners have not filed process for issuing notice to the respondents. When the matter came up in the defect list today, none appears for the petitioners. Post for disposal tomorrow.” When the matter was taken up today for disposal, today also none appears for the petitioners. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.