1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1443 OF 2001 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 22097 OF 2000 Ashokchand S/o Kachrulal Lohia .. .. Applicant Versus 1. Dwarkabai W/o Narayandas Bogdia and others .. .. Respondents Shri P. P. Bafna, Advocate for the Applicant - absent. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. None appeared for the applicant. No vakalatnama is filed on behalf of applicant/appellant. Perused the application and previous roznama. It appears that, the appellant is not interested to proceed further with the matter. Moreover, the present appeal is not within limitation and there is an application for condonation of delay. Some respondents have not been served so far despite time was allowed to serve the respondents. Mean time, it is informed that, applicant’s/appellant’s counsel Shri Dhanuka died and Shri Bafna was representing applicant/appellant. On his request also matter was adjourned 2 time to time. It is an appeal filed in the year 2000, along with application for condonation of delay. As such, the appeal itself is not maintainable on the ground of delay. 2. Upon consideration of record and having gone through earlier roznama, it appears that, applicant/appellant failed to proceed further with the matter. The application is devoid of merits. The application for condonation of delay stands dismissed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Nov.09