IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 28TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23862 of 2011(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- C.T.KHADEEJA,AL-HUDA,20/1235A, PANNIANKARA,V.K.K.ROAD,CALICUT. BY ADV. SMT.T.RESMI DAMODARAN SRI.P.P.RAJEEV LAXMAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. M/S.HOTEL KINGSBAY,REPRESENTED BY SAHIR.N.M, S/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI,KINGLY,ERANHIPALAM.P.O, BILATHYKULAM,KOZHIKODE-673006. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KOZHIKODE, PIN-673001. 3. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER,KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DISTRICT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE-673001. 4. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER(H),KOZHIKODE, PIN-673001. 5. THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673001. *6. THE DIRECTOR,DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,KOZHIKODE-673001. (* 6TH RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.14907/11 DATED 19/9/11) ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION FOR R5 SROI.M.K.C.DAS, SC, PCB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.23862/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DT 5.4.11 CASTED EBFORE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 5.8.11 CASTED BEFORE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.8.11 CASTED BEFORE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 23862 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 19th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's grievance appears to be against the functioning of the restaurant owned by the 1st respondent mainly on allegations of pollution. It is seen that the petitioner has already brought this to the notice of the 3rd respondent by filing Ext.P3 and according to the petitioner, no further action has been taken on the said complaint. 2. In view of the said grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that the 3rd respondent will examine Ext.P3 with notice to the 1st respondent and pass appropriate orders in the matter. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp