Criminal Miscellaneous No.3286 OF 2000 ---- In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ---- 1. MAHABIR PRASAD SHARMA, SON OF LATE MOHAN LAL SHARMA, RESIDENT OF 607, LAV KUSH TOWER, EXHIBITION ROAD, P.S. GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA. 2. DEEPANKAR GHOSH, SON OF SHRI A.K. GHOSH, RESIDENT OF 607, LAV KUSH TOWER, EXHIBITION ROAD, P.S. GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHRI ASHOK SINGH, SON OF SHRI SULAKSHAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-MIRGANJ, ARRAH, P.S. ARRAH TOWN, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. ---- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ---- Rakesh Kumar,J. Today again, when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. On 5.7.2010 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, the case was adjourned for a day with indication that if on the next date, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners, the case shall be decided on the basis of materials available on record. On 5.7.2010, it was also observed that earlier on 21.5.2010, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 2. In this case, order of stay of 2 further proceeding in court below is continuing in view of the order dated 18.2.2000. 3. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of order dated 29.11.1999 passed by Sri Ravindra Patwari, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna in Complaint Case No.669(c) of 1999 (T.R. No.1656 of 1999). By the said order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence under Sections 323, 341 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. I have perused the materials available on record including the impugned order. I am of the view that the petitioners have not made out an exceptional case warranting exercise of inherent jurisdiction in their favour. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. 6. In view of rejection of the present petition, interim order of stay dated 18.2.2000 stands automatically vacated. 7. Let a copy of this order be sent 3 to the court below forthwith. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 7.7.2010 N.A.F.R./N.H.