IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30543 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SABU THOMAS VINCENT, S/O.VINCENT THOMAS, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANJALY HOUSE, MATHILAKAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. ANTO AUGUSTIN, ALAKKALATHIL HOUSE, ANCHIRY P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. KAPIL.K, THRIPPAKKUDATH WARRIEM, KULAYETTIKKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.B.J.ABJITH SMT.SANDHYA RAMAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 560. BY ADV. SRI.T.A. SHAJI, UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 30543 of 2011(P) --------------------------------- APPENDIX ------------ PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS --------------------------- EXHIBIT P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER DATED 27.10.2011. EXHIBIT P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 29.10.2011. EXHIBIT P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 29.10.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ----------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 30543 of 2011 P ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioners submit that they appeared for B.Tech 3rd semester examination and failed in some papers. They submitted Exts.P1 to P3 applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No.30543/2011 : 2 : 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the University for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/16/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge