WPMS No. 7412 of 2001 (Old No. 26335 of 1994) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S. Dhulia learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner have challenged the order dated 17.05.1994 of the Commissioner, Meerut Mandal, Meerut passed under Section 15(5) of U.P. Urban Planning Development Act 1973 and the order dated 01.10.1993 of Haridwar Development Authority rejecting the lay-out plan filed by the petitioners. An appeal was filed against the order rejecting the proposed lay-out plan for construction of the building which was submitted by the petitioners. The Haridwar Development Authority has given the reasons for not sanctioning the lay-out plan of the petitioners. State Govt., the appellate authority also concerned with the reasons given by Sanctioning Authority. I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the order impugned. There is no bar in the way of the petitioners for filing second amended plan for sanction. However, the petitioners may submit revised lay-out plan for sanction according to the regulation framed under the Act after removing the objections raised in the order of rejection as well as in the appellate Court’s order. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (P.C. Verma, J.) 14.10.2003 NCM