IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 949 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22047/2010 Dated 16/07/2010 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- ST.JOSEPH'S ENGLISH MEDIUM HSS, ERAVU P.O., THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. BY ADV. MR. K.B.GANGESH MS. SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. S.GOVINDAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, 36/685A, BAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, KOCHI. 2. HARIDAS, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE AREA ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, EPF ORGANIZATION, DISTRICT OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, DELMA COMPLEX, SHORNUR ROAD, THRISSUR. R1 BY ADV. MR. S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR, SENIOR ADVOCATE MR. M.CHANDRA BOSE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ COC (C) No. 949 of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 3rd day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT This Contempt of Court case has been preferred by the petitioner, referring to the alleged contumacious act on the part of the respondents, giving scant regards to Annexure A1 judgment passed on 16.7.2010, whereby, in spite of the interception made by this Court, the respondents by way of 'garnishee proceeding', caused to siphon out a sum of Rs.3,90,348/- from the bankers of the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents contemners, with reference to the statement filed and the documents produced submits that, the proceedings happened to be pursued on the basis of some 'communication-gap' and there is absolutely no element of disrespect to this Court. It is also stated that, on knowing about the actual position, as contained in Annexure A1 judgment, the demand draft obtained from the Bankers has already been returned to the Bank, so as to be credited to the account of the petitioner and that the matter will be pursued only subject to further orders to be passed in conformity with the directions given by this Court vide Annexure A1 judgment. COC No. 949 of 2010 : 2 : 3. In the above circumstances, this Court finds that no further action is necessary. The above submission is recorded and accordingly, the contempt matter is closed. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd