IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2008 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36000 of 2008(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ROY JOSEPH, AGED 35, S/O.JOSEPH MATHEW, KALLAMPALLIL HOUSE, ANAKKALLU PO., KANJIRAPPILLY, NOW WORKING AS HSST JUNIOR COMPUTER SCIENCE, SMV HSS POONJAR. BY ADV. SRI.BENOY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE MANAGER, SMV HSS, POONJAR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.36000/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner was appointed as HSST Junior in computer Science on 16.7.2001, in the school of which the 4th respondent is the Manager. Exts.P1 and P1(a) are the orders approving the appointment. It is stated that the course was granted by Ext.P2(a) with a condition that there will be no financial commitment on the part of the Government. Consequently, by Ext.P3 Regional Deputy Director rejected the approval sought for. Petitioner submits that the Manager sought creation of HSST post by submitting Ext.P4 to the first respondent and petitioner submits that orders have not been passed on Ext.P4. It is in these circumstances the writ petition has been filed. 2 In the light of Ext.P2(a) only the Government can consider the request in Ext.P4 and as according to the petitioner, orders have not been passed on Ext.P4, I direct that the first respondent shall consider the same with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3