IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14351 of 2010 JAYRAM MAHTO, S/o Singeshwar Mahto. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the co-villager of the informant and has been implicated for being a relation of the in-laws of the husband who killed his daughter for ends of dowry. However, during trial of the co-accused the prosecution did not support the case and resultantly all the co-accused were acquitted of the charges. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 18.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 119 of 2003 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be 2 a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)