IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 141 OF 2011 ALONGWITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2011 Shivanand Shankar Kore ... Applicant/Orig. Complainant V/S. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents/ Orig.accused Mr. K.B. Parajape i/by. Mr. Pradip Kadam, Advocate for the applicant in both the matters. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the State in both the matters. Mr. M. Ramesh for respondents no.2 and 3 in ABA- 141/2011. Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for respondents no.3 and 4 in ABA-142/2011. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 9th August, 2011. P.C. :- 1. This is a common order on the above two applications for cancellation of anticipatory bail to respondents no.2 and 3 in both the applications. It is the allegation of the applicant who is a builder by profession that the said respondents painted a rosy picture before him that they wanted to purchase number of flats from the applicant for the residence of the respondents and others. The applicant had accordingly sold in all 9 flats to these respondents. He alleges that the respondents have made only part payment for the flats. According to him, they have also diverted the loan obtained by them from the bank by mortgaging the flats. Mr. Paranjape, the learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the custodial interrogation of this applicant is required in order to trace the amount of loan taken by these respondents. 2. All contentions raised in the application relate to the merits of the case. There is no contention that these respondents have either abused the liberty granted to them or violated any of the terms and conditions of the bail order. The merits of the case have already been properly considered and appreciated by the Sessions Court while granting anticipatory bail. Hence, the applications are dismissed. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]