IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1720 of 2006 DULARI DEVI & ORS Versus CHANDAR SAH @ CHANDRA SAH & OR ----------- 2. 29.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not find any error in the impugned order rejecting the application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 C.P.C., inasmuch as the sale deed in question came into existence only during the pendency of the appeal and the court below has held that that will not have any material bearing on the result of the appeal. That being so, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application being wholly misconceived is, hereby, dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/