Criminal Misc.No.M-35027 of 2010(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-35027 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 02, 2011 Om Pal Tonger ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.Jasjit Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent – State. (assisted by Inspector Inder Singh, PS City Ballabgarh, District Faridabad). NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This is an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure in case bearing First Information Report No.598 dated November 03rd, 2010 under Sections 148, 186, 307, 332, 353, 427, 436 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in Police Station City Ballabgarh, District Faridabad. By order dated January 18th, 2011, Ajay Tewari, J., granted interim bail to the petitioner. The operative part of the order reads as under:- “Both the contentions are a matter of evidence and proof. Without commencing on the respective merits either of the story held out by the petitioner or the respondents, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to his joining the investigation. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner, he shall Criminal Misc.No.M-35027 of 2010(O&M) [ 2 ] be released on anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.” Learned State counsel has stated that pursuant to the aforesaid order, passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation and as such, he is not required for custodial interrogation. This being so, the order dated January 18th, 2011 passed by this Court is made absolute. Petition is allowed. August 02, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) gian JUDGE