r (^r^\0^1 S!i,??M S SCMS's,. OllilSl.E BEflW IN^THEilON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. '^l^-'-i /2010 PETITIONERS ^ ,^ ^sy ,^^" j(?V .-'» Middle Block Raipur 1.' Shyam Singh Sona, S/o Shri Pardeshi Ram, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, School, Barkani, Devbhog, Distt. (C.G.) l'. Geunpat Ram Kashyap, S/o Shri Bansidhar Kashyap, aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Mugjhar, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. l Chain Singh Kashyap, S/o Shri ' Dashraat Kashyap, aged about aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Kadalimuda, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur ^(C.G.) 4. Nirmal Singh Dhruv, S/o Dallu Ram Dhruv, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Mugjhar, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) TB 5. Kundan Lal Harpal, S/o Shri Sunder Singh, aged about 43 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Sitleejor, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 6. Dayanidhi Yadav, S/o Lachchu Ram, aged about 45 years Assistant Teacher, Primary School Dhaman- beda, Block- Devbhog, District Raipur (C.G.) f^' 7. Nepalchand Yadu, S/o Shri Ugrasen Yadu, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Priraary School, Dhugiyamuda, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 8. Laxman Singh Manjhi, S/o Chhote Lal, aged about 45 years, Head Master, Primary School, Dhumar^ guda, Block Devbhog, Distt. ^ Raipur(C.G.) 9. Tikam Singh Thakur, S/o Pila Madali, aged about 37 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Bhatigarh, Block Mainpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) '^ o RESPONDENTS VERSUS si^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. District Education officer, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Comniissioner, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development, Department, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Devbhog, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, Block Mainpur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 78 W^I ^ l<-<i+ wnan^isFiw a. tdtfCtT ai^i* T^ •^ll<11<yl'LI, ®ill-LI'IC,fadl'M^ .M.£^:..^.:.^l^ sn^i Tra^r (yil-ii^) t%IW^fCT3II^?I SB : HON'BLE MR. JU8TICE PRIT 09.09.S010 Shri R&kesh Anthonv, couns T> ~. .tc .hi;! Grievance of the petitioners } were apocinted s.s AssistFuit Teachl examination at their own expen^ oetitioners have not been granted dated24.12,1998. Counsel for the petitioners s1 of law invoived in the oresent netl decision ol this Court ;n the mattel Vs. Mu&icipal Corporation, Dur; 95 8s the petitioners are also er circular dated 24^12.98,, This fact is not disputed by t] In view of above, the petitic decision of this Court in the matte (supraS, sufcsject to verification of th< have acauired B.Ed/D.Ed certiticati cireuiars dated 24.12.98 and furtl two advajice increments or nct. '^•iT<'rf^FTt;r1 T?FT?fr ^ fST3t XR?t'^T< '^affiiHan^i fi for the Detitioners. Stais. |n the aresent petitior! is that they irs, thev have passed B.Ed/D.Ed. |es dunng service, noweve;-, tne two increments as per circuiar !ibmits that the facts a.nd Question ttion are sauareiy covered bv the of Yashwant Kumar B&aradwaj SE AnotheF, 2006 (III MPJR-CG titled for two increments as oer he State counsei. |n is disposed of in terms of the t- of Yashwaat Kuaar BharadwaJ i iact. as to whether the oetitioners j". at t'neir own expenses as oer the iter whether thev have been uaid Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge