WSMW ^ IN TM» aON'*: B, HZQM CQiQSS OI> CtBAStXSOARa At BXIASPUR WRIT I»B?It20N N0< 3S^°t/200S PtItIONBR-.»•' ^ ..«> ^K^" ^'''^r'c.-"' ..'''. ^T,'0>*'- -^^y' ^w><c;°r BtESPONDEaCTS x^'"' $- ^ Dayaram O^ampaaoh S/o late A@ai?<3haBe <SurupaB@h» afed Qtooate 4S years, Siiib- EaaiQi^eei? Posted ate P^H^E^ Division» Raipiar (c,@.). VERSUS ?- /!<, itee State ofCtafeiatfeisgairtii lffit«m@h fehe Se@reteaiy» Beparta^ent- .ot V^H^K^ ^.'' -: Raipur (C.O.). ^. ^€ 2 * The Cbiei ai@l®eex? P.H.E, Raipiar (€•©•), 3 o tfee Si2perAnt«?dent E»gi2i@er P •H«E«Ra ipur (c* ©•). WRITPET3TI0N miDBR ARSICLE 226 OP THE OONSTIFyTION©»XNDIA FOR ISSUANCT P? APP iOPRIATE WRlK S) pRl3ER( S) AND DIREGTION (SJ_TODO 3USTICE IN THE NATTER. XI-HC-22 3^ '<IMI<n<4, ^TdwKo, (®«ni^y 3ll^lM51<»l mwTwte^"p-s-sx:t-^ 200^ t^c' ^TI^T^T R^icb^n^r ^rioF^fgcf St»Hlct>^ 3TI^T ?^<TTW ^rf^T 12.8.2005 . Shri M.K.Bhaduri, cot| Shri Pankaj Shrivast^ S.A.No. 6803/2005 '. This is an appiication on Board.' This interim applicatioj W.P.N0.3S99/2005 Heard on admission. The submission of !e| petitioner is presentiy work| Raipur. He submits that m^ have been given the charg^ any basis and the petitioner given to his juniors, He furtl^ Sub-Engineer whereas the ^ officlating Assistant Engin^ei^ Learned counsel for tl1 this petition may be .dispose) detaiied representation be| competent authorlty may be| within a stjpuiated period gra| , Shri Fl State has no objection to th| forthe petitioner. . This prayer is aifowed] <bNld4lT1 Hl^dTifte^<(^^i< ^3rf^T3TI^T nsel for the petitioner. /a, Panei Lawyer for the State. for urgent hearing. The matter is taken up 1 stands disposed of. irned counse! for the pefitioner is that the ng as Sub-Engineer jn PHE Dlvision at iny junior Sub-Engineers to the petitioner ^ of officiating Assistant Engineer without las been deprived ofthe above advantage er submits that the petitioner is a graduate ersons who have been given a chance of , are the Diploma hoiders. ie petitioner submits that for the tlme being i of with a Siberty to the petltioner to fiie a ;ore the competent authority and the directed to dispose of the representation ited bythisCourt. ankaj Shrivastava, Pane! La\fryer for the ^ said iimited prayer made by the counsei XI-HC-22 3^" ^INId^l, ®Tflwi<p,fa<ni«y 3ii^i ^?icn ^i*idi ff»Hi<t>•^^^•^^^^^•^^^ 200 W^T^T f^TTOW^T ^RT^^rfN "f' ^uvJ^ ^'t»t<» ^. ^ ^^ctlW ^^ -^— The petitiQner is give| wjthin a period of 3 weeks and if such a representatioi|) competent authority shall preferably within a period o1] the representation by pas^i grievance raised by the petiti| With the aforesaid disposed of. Consequently, !VI.W.P| <bl^ld41^ ^HdT^tec^<Rt<<l< ^3rf^T3TI^T a Siberty to fiie a detaited representation rom today before the competent aythority is filed, within a period of 3 weeks, the lispose^the same as eariy as possibie 6 weeks from the date of fiiing/recejpt of ing a reasoned order in reiation to the >ner. obser^ation, the petition stands finally No. 3022/2005 aiso stands disposed of. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^' (^y^) '^ ll y I!881 lill itl'l II 811