IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21892 of 2008 NAWAL MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 22.12.2008 Heard Sri Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri D. Mehta, APP for the State. Regard being had to the facts of the case and direct participation of the petitioner, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. However, it was contended that the Addl. Public Prosecutor Incharge, who is handling Sessions Trial No. 131 of 2008, is not serious about the prosecution and on many dates he did not produce the witnesses in court for their examination by not filing their appearance. I direct the learned Judge to call Addl. Public Prosecutor in his chamber and impress upon him that if the same contention is raised before any court of law, it could have very serious implications not only on the character of Advocates generally but the carrier of the learned counsel specially also as regards holding brief for the prosecution. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)