^^^5^:.. ^•••••s^^^l12'-"" •^yvs" ^ ^ ^- U? \0TS^.—, BEFORE THE HON'BI^HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS / w. p. fo NO. ^rr'6 1 2010 /:•' Sheetal Kumar Pawar, S/o Shri S.R. Pawar, aged about 30 years, R/o Qtr.No.lO-A, Street No.31/A, Sector- 10, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) VERSUS : 1) Chief Information Commissioner, Cenfral Information Commission, II floor, August-Kranti Bhawan, Bheekaji Kama Place, New Delhi. / 2) The Chairman, Railway Recruitment Board, Opp. GM/NCR Office Building, Subedarganj, Allahabad (U.P.) ^3] The Memb'er Secretary, Public Information OfBcer, Railway Recmitment Board, Opp. • GM/NCR Office Building, Subedarganj, Allahabad (U.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^mCOUIE'R®IR^UH«1iaiSQ«RH^BU^^ WRTT PETEnON (Cl N0.8888 OF 2010 Petitioner Vereus Respondents She^al Kumar Pawar Chief Infonnation Commissioner SOthere WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 228 GF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. SaUsh K. Agnihohri, J.) Present:- Shri P.R.Patankar, Adwscsrte for the petitioner. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 1811' day of November, 2010) 4. By this petition, the petitioner seeka adirection to the re^>ondent No.1/ Chief Information Commissloner to decide the appea^ apptication preferred by the pet'rtioner before him. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a second appeal before the respondent No.1 on 14.7.2010 (Annexure P-7) by the speed post and thereafter, a reminder has also been submitted by the petitroner on25.8.2010 (Annexure P-9), but no decision has yet been taten by the Chief Information Commissioner/ respondent No.1, tlll date. According to leamed counset appearing for the petltioner, appeat ought to have been decided within r^isonable time. It te expected that the respondent No.l/Chief Information Commisstoner shall examine the appeal/application of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, ss early as possibte. In view of foregoir^, learned wunsel appearii^ for the petltioner submits that nothing remalns for adjudlcation in this matter. Accordingly, the writ petitlon is disposed of. No order asto costs. ^ Sd/- .' SatishK.Agnibom, ashok