^iweK^y^. J: ^ec V^ IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH c AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. g^ S6 /2008 PETITIONER ^•^ ^s^- •»»"~ ^,:^^.-- L»9 ^<€P RESPONDENTS Balbir Singh Shakya S/o Hiralal Shakya, Aged about 45 years, Veterinary Department, R/o Ambikpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Animal Husbandry Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Veterinary Services, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Ambikpur, Distt. - Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^ c^ <"" ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2420 OF 2008 PETITIONER Balbir Singh Shakya Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others. (Writ petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : hlon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Jeet Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 7th day ofApril, 2010) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 04.03.2008 (Annexure P/7) where by the Director, Veterinary Services, Chhattisgarh, has directed the Joint/Deputy Directors, Veterinary Services of all the Districts to make available original certificates of Higher Secondary/10+2 examination pass certificate of the employees working in Class-IV service and the confidential reports ofthe said employees between the years 2002-2006. 2. On the basis of this, it appears, no order has been passed. The communication between the Director and other subordinate does not raise any cause of action, as no formal order has been passed. Even if the formal order has been passed, the same is not under challenge in this petition. Thus, this petition is vague, discloses no cause of action. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition being bereft of merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. 4. No order asto costs. §d/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Gowri