<?"-•' f-'w ^ ^ J^o^ (.....-- ^<:>LA<:s..b.^..-"-- Rn.No......-:;"-^-}7k^C22^~ p,,sente ^.^5;>:t::::^..... dated.....-^"5f"<""/""" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. /2006 PETITIONER SmtSandya Pandey W/o Ashok Kumar Pandey Age about 37years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. Primary School, Jamul-2 Block & Distt. -Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State Govt. ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Educational Dtepartment Raipur(C.G.) ^ 2. Distric Education Officer Durg (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENT s"^ ^1^ 'ey^'TS^' '^' V't r ^-^ XI-HC-78 +11+1MI aifllch 3^'^fraicTO, »Tl1tf'16,Rldiuy jfg,..^f?..^A3/.0^. W[ 200 Sll^l Wh ('^y'sff) 3n^T?iTR.fi+ TOT3:I1^Tsti*1 5T(ITWBf^(T3T1^T +i''<Fri''fl-t ^iti<iTfftec^<Rt+di< ^i 3)1^1)'3TI^T ^-•' ^~. Barve 11.8.2006:- Heard Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. The case of the petftioner is as per the Instructions dated 24-12-g Teaohers who have passed B.T.I., expenses after 22-10-64 are entitle^ Government is Annexure-P/1. The pe^ own oost in the year 1994 and a cert| petitioner has not been given the ben| been granted two advance incremenf Court. Havjng heard learned counse and cireumstances of the case, withoj case, the petitioner is allowed to mak^ this petition raising all her grieyance| days from today and in tum, responc| the petitioner in the light of averments| the representation also. If respondent| situated persons have been granted the petitioner's case is also covered basis of Government's order, then to today, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, th| Parties are entitled for oertifiedl o(3unsel for the petitioner. A|Jv. for the State on advance copy. tl|iat she is working as Assistant Teacher and j8 jssued by the State of M.P. the Assistant P.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own for two advance increments and order of ftioner passed the B. Ed. examination on her Ificate to that effeot is Annexure-P/3, but the ^fit whereas, similariy situated persons have |s under the orders of the Tribunal and this for the parties, having regard to the facts ^it expressing any opinion of the merit of the a detailed representation along with copy of ^ to respondent No.2 within a period of 15 ic|ent No.2 is directed to examine the case of |made by the petitioner in this petition and in |No.2 reaches to the conclusion that similariy |the benefit of two advance inorements and for grant of two advance increments on the j)ass orders within a period of 3 months from s petition stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. Sd/- L.i ^ ^ P.T.O. i*-