WP 10975/10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10975/2010 Navnath Motiram Shirsale V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri C.V.Thombre, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4. Shri M.V. Ghatge, Advocate for respondent no.5. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 14.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has filed the present petition contending that the work conducted by the respondent no.5 has not been conducted properly and further that the amount has been paid to him before completion of the work. In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the respondent nos.3 & 4, it is categorically stated that the work has been done in proper manner. Apart from that, it is stated that even after WP 10975/10 2 completion of the work, the respondent no.5 is required to maintain the same for a period of three years. In that view of the matter, we do not find that there is any public interest involved in the present petition. We do not want to go into various allegations made against the petitioner in the affidavit in reply filed by the State as well as by the respondent no.5. The petition is, therefore, found to be devoid of merit and as such the same is dismissed. Since we find that the petition is not in the public interest, we direct that the amount of Rs.25,000/-, which was directed to be deposited by the petitioner in this Court, be transmitted to the High Court Bar Library at Aurangabad. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 14.12.2011 ndk/c14121138