C.R. No.4802 of 2000(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4802 of 2000(O&M) Date of Decision: 12.11.2009 Sanjay Kumar and others .....Petitioner Versus Sheo Ram and others ....Respondents Present: None for the parties. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The application had been filed by the plaintiff in a suit for specific performance for injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the property to defendant No.8 or to any other person and from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit property. The injunction had been granted in favour of the plaintiff against which the defendants No.1, 3, 4 and 8 preferred an appeal to the Additional District Court, Kaithal and the appeal was also dismissed. At the time when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners or the respondents. 2. Having regard to the fact that the Court has disposed of the application finding a prima facie case regarding possession and the other claim of the plaintiff relating to enforceability of the agreement, I do not think that there is a scope for interference. C.R. No.4802 of 2000(O&M) -2- The civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be, however, no direction as to costs. The trial Court shall take up the case and dispose it of after full-fledged trial in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of receipt of record from this Court. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 12, 2009 Pankaj*