1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 207 OF 2010 (Sudhabai Pandurang Thakre vs. Yashodabai T. Mahartale & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 28, 2010. Heard Shri Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Khajanchi, learned counsel for the respondents. It is not in dispute that father of present petitioner Tukaram was tenant and he died in 1995. Till 1985-86, names of daughters of Tukaram and wife of Tukaram were appearing in 7/12 extracts as in cultivating possession. Thereafter name of present petitioner alone surfaced and the petitioner is not in a position to explain how the names of others were deleted. The petitioner is also not claiming any tenancy from the original owners i.e. public trust i.e. Dattatraya Sansthan, Mahur. The tenant – Tukaram was alive till 1995. In this situation, lower appellate Court has considered all these facts and has also noticed that the petitioner was staying at a distance of 30 Kms. from suit land and the neighbours have supported cultivation by the respondents. Before this Court, reliance is being placed on 2 7/12 extracts but that reliance is mis-conceived because the petitioner is not in a position to point out her name alone continued by deleting the name of others. The mention in sale deed of suit property that she is in possession, is of no assistance in this background. I, therefore, do not find that any case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.