IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 29.06.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.15177 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 M/s.Color India, represented by its Proprietor R.Selvam, No.124, Vishnu Kanchi, Little Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram – 631 501. .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Kancheepuram, Formerly known as Assistant Commissioner (CT) Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. 2.The Commercial Tax Officer (CT) Kancheepuram South, Formerly known as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (CT) Kancheepuram South, Kancheepuram District. 3.The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Chennai. 4.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Commercial Taxes, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in RC.No.94/2003/A3 in TNGST 1620595/ 1995-96 dated 9.6.2011 and to quash the same as illegal, unlawful and unconstitutional and direct the 4th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner firm dated 9.2.2006 and dispose. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.Kanmani Annamalai Government Advocate (Taxes) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for Taxes appearing for the respondents 1, 2 and 4. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the fourth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.02.2006, and pass appropriate orders within a specified period. He had also submitted that the second respondent may be restrained from initiating revenue recovery proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice, dated 09.06.2011, till the representation of the petitioner is disposed of by the fourth respondent. 3. The learned Government Advocate for Taxes appearing on behalf of the respondents 1, 2 and 4, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In such circumstances, the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.02.2006, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The second respondent is directed not to initiate revenue recovery proceedings against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned notice, dated 09.06.2011, till the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.02.2006, is disposed of by the fourth respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. cse Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Kancheepuram, Formerly known as Assistant Commissioner (CT) Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The Commercial Tax Officer (CT) Kancheepuram South, Formerly known as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer (CT) Kancheepuram South, Kancheepuram District. 3.The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Chennai. 4.The Secretary, Department of Commercial Taxes, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. + 1 cc to M/s. D. Ravichandran, Advocate SR No.37653 MP(CO) SR/30.6.2011 Writ Petition No.15177 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/