1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2140 OF 2008 Kochuputhanparambil James ..Petitioner -versus State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondents Mr.Manoj S.Mahambrey, for the petitioner Smt P.P.Shinde, APP for state. CORAM: A.V.POTDAR, J. DATED: 12 th February,2009 P.C. 1. Heard advocate for the petitioner. By the present petitioner, he is challenging the act of the learned Magistrate, who have exhibited documents in CC No.242/SS/2006 which find place on internal page 7. The Roznama, the documents were marked as exh. 8 and 9 colly. He has given reference of number of judgments passed by the Full Bench of this Court as well as by Apex Court. At the same time, cross examination of the complainant is yet to commence. It is to be cleared here that to exhibit document and document has been proved as required to be proved in law, are two different aspects and parties before the Court are not to mix these two questions together. It is made clear that as a matter of fact document is 2 exhibited as referred does not amount that the document has been proved as required to be proved in law. With this clarification I do not find any substance in the petition. Hence the petition stands rejected. (A.V.POTDAR, J. )