^ ^ 'S^ r<ii*ii<'i*i, y>Tii'M<i<o, f®i<ni^^< WTOirwra;-'u:lf^-"l:'l^---(a20o-g ^n^r 1c^^ (^cit3^?) ^TT^r'SRT'f^fNF TTO 3?TT^I s?n*iw 1PRTTW 1Rf?TT 3H^I PETiTIONER: -\ RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. 3. (Writ Petition under Article Slnale Bench: Hon'bi 5-1-2009:- Shri Subhash Yadav, counsei fl Shri Rakesh Jha< Deputy Govt,| Heard» Grievance of the petitioner is tt] vide order dated 8-11-2007 and pos^ No.2. Vide order dated 20-12-2007 hij posted as In-charge Prindpal, Pand^ several representations for relievir^ resQondent No.1 vide order of Annexl cni^(<t1<fll 'HWJf "^ fS^t iFst^K ^3^Rm3?n^i Devesh Prasad, S/o Late Shri Ratneshwar Prasad, aged about 34 years, Occupation Service, (Principai) Assistant Director, Office of the Assistant Commissioner, TribaS Deveiopment Jagdalpur, Distt. Sastar (CG) fersus- State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretairy, Schedule Tribe and Scheduie Caste Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (CG) The Commlssioner, Schedule Tribe and Scheduie Caste Devetopment, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) 226 of the Constitution of Jndia) a Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. )f the petitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents. iat he was promoted to the post of Prindpal ed as Assistant Dlrector under respondent s order of posting was amended and he v^s ipani, Jagdalpur. The petitioner submitted g him to jojn at Pandripani, hol^ever, jre-P/7 dated 7-5-2008 posted one Tijuram ^ ^ ^Wc-^s '^^cy ^f^ "SRT f<t<J<sb 1c?^?T W^I ^^cft v Y Bar/e '3^ <<<i4KytAl, s?tH'H4Ko, {s<<ytiy!^< •<(*«<tt^^T^ "^t200 3:n^r<^^ (^i^*?) i^nw^rfti^s^r Annexure-P/7 may be kept in abeyan files fresh representation against hi^ '^R^ifer^T'w^i^f^S xN^gx ^? ^ifro 3^? Dhruv as Principal of Pandripani Sch<|)o}. The petitioner has now been transferred from Pandnpani'to Government 1-tigher Secondary School, Kukanar, Biock Darbha, District Bastar as in charg^ Principal though the petitioner was never :'N^i--^ allowed to join at Pandripani. Learned counsel for the petjtioner submJtted that this petition may be disposed of with Jiberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondents for redressai of his gri^vances and in the meanwhiie, the order of ?e tiit the repr^entation is decided. Learned counsel for the resp(|ndents submitted that in case the petitjoner transfer order of Annexure-P/8 dated 7-7- 2008 before respondent No.1 withiji 10 days from today, the same shaii be considered and decided within a furtt|er period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. He further subi|nitted that in the meanwhile, the order of Annexure-P/8 so far as it relates to tt^e petitioner shall not be given effeot to tilt the representation ofthe petitioner is dec^ded. In view of the submissions nr|ade by jearned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of ^ representation against the transfer oi withln a period of 10 days from toda^ petitioner, respondent No.1 shall co|isider and decide the same within a further period of 6 weeks from the date of the order of Annexure-P/8 so far as effect to till representation of the peti|ioner is decided Ith Jiberty to the petitioner to file fresh fder of Annexure-P/8 before respondent No.1 !. On such representation being made by the eceipt of representation. in the meanwhile, it relates to the petltioner shali not be given Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge