Civil Revision No.372 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.372 of 2010 Date of decision:09.02.2010. Haridal Singh Bansal ...Petitioner Versus Ved Parkash Sharma ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ankur Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Atul Nehra, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not in a position to challenge the findings on merit. However, he requests little morewhile to enable the petitioner – tenant to arrange alternative accommodation. This, the argument proceeds, would enable the petitioner to arrange his butter and bread for the sustenance of his family. In appreciation of the difficulty explained by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and also in acceptance of the undertaking given by him, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he has no objection to the grant of little extra time for vacation of the tenanted premises. In the light thereof, the petition shall stand dismissed on merits. The order dated 07.12.2009 granted by the learned Rent Controller shall stand affirmed. However, in the face of the verbal presentation about the difficulty, the petitioner – tenant shall have one year's time to vacate the Civil Revision No.372 of 2010 -2- tenanted premises. The grant of this concession is subject to the fact that the petitioner – tenant shall continue to pay the due arrears of rent, within a period of two months' from today and keep on paying the monthly rent by the 7th of every calendar month. February 09, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE