WP(C) 2967/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. S.P. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. G. Soren, learn ed State Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. This writ petition is proposed to be disposed of at the motion state itself with out issuing notice to the respondent No.3, who is the opposite party in Criminal Revision Petition No.4/2010 stated to be pending before the Deputy Commissioner , Karbi Anglong, Diphu. According to the petitioners, though the said criminal revision petition has been filed and all the parties have entered appearance, th e said proceeding has not been disposed of by the Deputy Commissioner till date. The petitioner, therefore, prays for a direction directing the Deputy Commissi oner, Karbi Anglong, Diphu to dispose of the said revision petition in accordanc e with law after hearing all concerned parties. Mr. Soren, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 has su bmitted that though the instruction was sought for relating to the reason for de lay in disposal of the revision petition, no instruction has been received so fa r. Keeping in view the contention of the petitioner, instead of keeping the writ pe tition pending, the same is disposed of directing the Deputy Commissioner, Karbi Anglong, Diphu to decide the said proceeding in accordance with law and upon he aring all the parties to such proceeding, if such proceeding has not been dispos ed of till date. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a perio d of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the orde r passed today alongwith the copy of the writ petition and its enclosures append ed thereto to be produced by the petitioners before the Deputy Commissioner, Kar bi Anglong, Diphu, if the said proceeding has not already been disposed of. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.