k LVOw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) S.A. NO. §é> laggg ; APPELLANT - ’Lucky Bharat Garage Pvt. Ltd. DEFENDANT uxya/ Mahatma Gandhi ROad, Branch Office— Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District- Janjgir—Champa. VERSUS J RESPONDENTs : ’fff Suresh Kumar khetan, about ’ PLAINTIFFS. aged 37 years, son o£ Dwarlka Prasad E Agrawal, utencil business, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, Distt. Janjgir- Champa. Delhi/U.P./M.P. Transport company L V/ Pvt. Ltd., 582, Sachdeva Malhotra ’ Marg, Kashmiri gate, Delhi-Gg’ww 6Q i" 17 VW aawwyg’g; /_ Second appeal against th.e/j11dgment and decree passed by‘?i l. Distt. Judge, Sakti in c.A. No. 02B/Qooo datedtiF10—2002 continuing judgement decree passed by ivi}l~"Judge Classy2, Sakti, in C.S. No. k W” 9-B/99 dated 14’8-2000. ‘9 BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ‘ 1 V XE-EC-ZZ m mama, "WWW, W m‘ §¥W RAI’Lmrr- z‘rkx I W3?“ ‘~=' 16] 04/ 2003 No one appears for the parties when the matter is called. In terms of the order dated 31/03/2003 the appellant was rcquinad to remove the. defaults pointed out by the office. Omcc note dated 07-04-2003 indicates that the defaults have not been removed. Accordingly, “he appeal is dismissed for ‘ non-prosecution. Sd/— m P.C-Naik Judge*‘*'* ’e‘m LM WeW »