IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.4155 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4155 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4155 OF 2008 Mrs Uma @ Rajashri Vishnu Mahadik @ Jayashree Bhausaheb Vikhe Patil, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr H.H.Ponda, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr K.V.Saste, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 25/11/2008 DATE : 25/11/2008 DATE : 25/11/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Ponda, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Saste, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in M.E.C.R.No.06 of 2008 of Malwani police station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 465,467,468,471,420,406,506(ii) read with 34 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the husband of the present applicant came in contact with complainant Tulsi Singh Rajput, to whom he represented to be a son-in-law of one of the prominent politicians in Maharashtra Shri Balasaheb Vikhe Patil and told him that he was having 9 acres 30 gunthas agricultural land, situated at Erangal village, Taluka Borivali, and that he was holding Special Power of Attorney and Sale Agreements from the original landlords and he intends to sell the said land. Admittedly, the applicant’s husband is the son-in-law of one Bhausaheb Vikhe Patil, who is not related to Shri Balasaheb Vikhe Patil. It appears that after due negotiations, on 29.4.2007 the original land owners and the complainant entered into Memorandum of Understanding to which the applicant’s husband was a confirming party. The complainant paid certain amount to the applicant’s husband. I have perused the documents on record. It is clear that in the present case the allegations are mainly against the applicant’s husband -Vishnu Mahadik. Keeping that in view and considering the nature of allegations connecting the applicant with the alleged offence, I am inclined to enlarge her on bail. Hence, the following order. 3. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.35,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station every alternate Saturday between 9 and 10 am for a period of 90 days from the date of her release. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. . The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)