1 AO-338-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 338 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 481 OF 2011 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 377 OF 2011 Shri Savjibhai Valjibhai Parmar ... Appellant (Orig. Plaintiff) Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents (Orig. Defendants) Mr. Anil C.Singh a/w Anil Yadav i/b. D.R.Shah,Advocate, for the appellant Mrs. S.V.Sonavane, AGP, for the respondent No.1 State. Smt.K.K.Soraan, Advocate, for the respondent No.2 - MCGM CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 8th June, 2011. P.C. 1. The Appeal is preferred against refusal of ad-interim relief, pending the Notice of Motion. This Court had directed on 11.3.2011 to maintain status quo as on that date and the status quo is being maintained. The Notice of Motion is still pending. 2. After hearing the learned Counsel, in my opinion, the interest of justice will be subserved by the following order :- 2 AO-338-11.sxw The Notice of Motion in L.C. Suit No.377/2011 be heard and disposed of within 8 weeks. The respondents/defendants may file reply to the Notice of Motion and/or written statement within four weeks from this day. The parties shall continue to maintain status quo till disposal of the Notice of Motion. The Appeal and the Application stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)