IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.1048 of 1989 Date of decision: January 29, 2008 Radhey Shayam … Petitioner Versus Amar Nath and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Sh.Satdev Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner Sh.Ashok Kumar Sharma, Counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 K.S.Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On 17th May, 1989, respondents were acquitted by the Court of Judicial Magistrate (1st Class), Faridabad, who granted benefit of doubt and held that prosecution has failed to prove offence under Section 411 IPC. Admittedly, no appeal against acquittal has been filed. Scope of Revisional Court is very limited. I have perused the judgment. No interference by Revisional Court is called for in view of the well reasoned findings returned by the Trial Court. No merit. Dismissed. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] Judge January 29, 2008. rps