- 1 - 9.ss.2353.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2353 OF 2010 State Bank of India ..Plaintiff -Versus- Dilip D. Kuril & Anr. ..Defendants .......... Ms.Ashiwini R. Pawar a/w. Ms.Rebeca Dias i/b AKS Legal Consultants for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 8TH NOVEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is filed to recover the amounts due and payable to the plaintiff by defendant no.1 and guaranteed by defendant no.2. 2 The defendants failed and neglected to pay the amount. There was no reply to the plaintiff’s advocate’s notice dated 3rd June, 2010. The agreement stipulates payment of interest. The defendants have not filed a reply. A compilation of documents is tendered by the plaintiffs in Court, is taken on record and marked “A” collectively. - 2 - 9.ss.2353.10 3 There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim. There is no reason not to accept the averments and submissions in the plaint. The suit is, therefore, decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be on the principal sum of Rs. 2,27,708/- on the basis of simple interest. Costs to be quantified as per Rules. Refund, if any, as per Rules. -