IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16066 of 2011 BALRAM MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 02. 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Torture for demand of dowry followed by ouster is the allegation, but submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that parties compromised, which was submitted by their learned counsels in the court of Sessions Judge even then he has not been allowed bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case vide C. R. No.483 of 2007, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)