IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2010 / 27TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 26080 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHERLY LATHA, W/O.G.D.RAJENDRAN, AGED 52 YEARS, HEAD MISTRESS, BEMLP SCHOOL, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN SRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL SRI.E.M.UNNIKRISHNAN (MANJERI) SRI.NIAS MOOPAN SRI.T.P.SAEED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CSI SCHOOL IN MALABAR AND WAYANAD DISTRICT, CORPORATE MANAGER OFFICE, BANK ROAD, KOZHIKODE. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. MADHUMATHI.M, AGED 49 YEARS, HEADMISTRESS, BEMLP SCHOOL, ANJARAKANDY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY G.P.SRI.DILIP MOHAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.26080 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated 18th August, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner who is presently working as Headmistress in B.E.M. L.P.School, Taliparamba filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P8 order of transfer. As per Ext.P8, she was transferred and posted as Headmistress in the said School cancelling the earlier order of transfer whereby she was transferred and posted to B.E.M.L.P.School, Chittattukara. Evidently, the said order is one passed under Rule 10 of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules. Availing the appellate remedy provided as per Rule 10(5) of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P9 appeal before the second respondent. In the said circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P9 appeal filed by the petitioner expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioner and respondents 1 and 3. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS