IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2186 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 20, 2011 Suresh Kumar .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 22.2.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by Collector, Kurukshetra; Order dated 17.9.2008 (Annexure P-2) passed by Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala Cantt.; and Order dated 8.12.2009 (Annexure P-3) CWP No.2186 of 2010 [2] passed by the Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Haryana. 2. Respondent No.4, Hakam Singh, has been appointed as Lambardar for village Kakrala Gujran, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra. 3. On consideration of impugned orders passed by Collector, Commissioner and Financial Commissioner, I find that all the relevant aspects of the case have been taken into account. Respondent No.4 has been appointed as Lambardar, essentially for the reason that respondent is 12th class pass. The petitioner is only 5th class pass. 4. I do not find any reason to judicially review the orders as education is a relevant and important criterion to be considered for appointment of Lambardar. Admittedly, respondent No.4 is more educated. 5. No ground for interference in extraordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. 6. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 20, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?