1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3094 of 2009 (Balu Rambhau Gosavi vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mrs. S.S.Jadhav, Adv., for the applicant. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP, for the respondent/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel. 2. Archana married to accused Balu three years prior to the incident dt.20th March, 2009. She has alleged that she was tortured by the husband and other relations for bringing an amount of Rs. 50,000/- from her parents. She was disliked due to swallow complexion. 3. In an incident dt.20th March, 2009, the wife Smt.Archana has 2 implicated the husband with specific role of having doused kerosene on her body and Sitabai lit her and she was virtually burnt. She expired subsequently. 4. It was contended that possibility of tutoring by parents cannot be ruled out as the victim was shifted from Government Hospital, Aurangabad, to the hospital at Jalna. At this stage, there cannot be a comment on this aspect of the matter as the dying declaration implicates the accused. Though chargesheet is filed, I do not see that any case for release on bail is made out. Application rejected. The observations are prima facie in nature. Liberty to apply again. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3094-09crapl