:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2006 IN IN IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 278 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 278 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 278 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8133 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 8133 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 8133 OF 2005 Parshuram raghunath Karanjkar .. Applicant AND Shri.Madhukar Baburao Mohite .. Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Applicant. Mr.V.M.Thorat for Original Appellant & Respondent No.4 Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.D.V.Sutar for Respondent Nos.5 to 9. Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for Respondent Nos.10 to 13. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare with Dilip Taur i/b. M/s.YKS Legal for Respondent Nos.7,9,10,11 and 13. WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2006 IN IN IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2005 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7066 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7066 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 7066 OF 2005 Parshuram raghunath Karanjkar .. Applicant AND Shri.Madhukar Baburao Mohite .. Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Applicant. Mr.V.M.Thorat for Original Appellant. Mr.D.V.Sutar for Respondent Nos.1 to 9,11 & 15. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare with Dilip Taur i/b. M/s.YKS Legal for Respondent Nos.10,12 to 14 & 16. :2: Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent No.17. Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for Respondent Nos.18 and 19. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 20TH JUNE, 2006. 20TH JUNE, 2006. 20TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant, original Appellant and Respondents. We have perused the order dated 16th February, 2006. It appears that the Applicant was not even a party in the aforesaid Letters Patent Appeals. However, both the learned Counsel for the parties categorically state that whatever orders which have been passed in favour of the Applicant in various proceedings, the same will be subject to the final decision of the suit, which is pending before the District Court, Solapur. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the Applicant was a member on 16th February, 2006, as per the order passed by this Court on 21st March, 2005 in Appeal from Order No.237 of 2005. In view of the same, both the Civil Applications stand disposed of. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)