Court No. 2 Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3199 (M/S) of 2001 (Old No.233 of 1983) Murari Lal Gupta ……... Petitioner. Versus The District Judge, Dehradun and Two others. ………. Respondents. …………………. Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. In this writ petition the sole petitioner Murari Lal Gupta died on 23.11.1998. There is nothing on record to show that any application for substitution was moved to substitute the heirs of the petitioner. An application dated 10.3.1992 is on record in which it has been prayed that the name of Smt. Shanti Gupta be deleted from the array of parties as she had expired on 01.01.1992 leaving behind her heirs and legal representatives who are already on record. As observed above, after the death of sole petitioner no substitution application was moved neither there is any correction on the memo of petition deleting the name of deceased Murari Lal Gupta and substituting the name of Smt.Shanti Gupta and other legal heirs. Application for substitution of Smt. Shanti Gupta and other legal heirs of Murari Lal Gupta is not available on record. There is no order on the order sheet regarding the substitution of the legal heirs of Murari Lal Gupta. In view of these facts, the petition stands abated and is hereby dismissed as such. No order as to costs. Interim order, if any, is discharged. 15.5.2002 (P.C. Verma, J.) P.Singh Review App. No. 4645/02 In WPMS NO. 3199 of 2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press the application. Application is dismissed as not pressed. 14.7.2003 (P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) P.Singh