IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '(C.G.) W..P.s. No. ggw /10 /, Balram Khande, S/o Dewsay Khande aged about 48 years, Farrash, Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS If RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ° 2. Director, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shashtri Shikshan Samiti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER wags; N0. 5800/2010 PETITIDNER Balmm Khande RESPONDENTS State of C.G. 8a 0thers WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQE OF INDIA Shri Neeraj Choubey, counsel for the petitioner. ' Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A.G. for the State/rasps. 1 6a 2. ORDER (07.10.2010) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petih'on is that he is the employee of Government Aided private educational institution and though he is entitled for the beneiit of 6‘11 Pay Commission as recommended by the Government for the government employees but the same has not been given to him. According to the petitioner earlier also when the benefit of 5th Pay Commission was refused to pen'tioner and similarly placed persons, Wlit petitions were filed before this Court and ultimately after passing of onier by this Court the benefit of 5th Pay Commission was granted to them. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that ends of justice [., would be sewed if at this stage the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition and diieciion be issued to the respondent No.1 for deciding the pending lepresentation of the petitioner (Annexure PIS) dated 11.6.2010. Counsel appearing for the State submits that the representan'on has been made by ”the petitioner directly to the Chief Minister whereas he is required to make suitable representation to respondent NO. l. He submits that the case of 3. ‘ the patitioner and similarly placed persons for grant of 6“! Pay Commission is aheady under consideration and let th pctitioner make a fresh representation and the same would be decided in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. In the eventuality of filing a fresh representation by the petitioner before the respondent No.1 within a period of one month from the date of receiyt of cepy of this order, it is ewected non] the said authorities to pass appropriate order as expeditiously as yossible preferably Within a period of four months from the date of its receipt. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned. would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance With law. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge e