IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1108 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25/03/2008 in WP NO : 6228 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 State Bank of India, Commercial Branch, Kannavarithota, Guntur. Rep by its Asst. General Manager, 2 The Debt Recovery Officer, (Authorised Officer) State Bank India, Commercial Branch, Guntur. ..... APPELLANTS AND M/s. Janatha Seva and Cold Storage, Pvt. Ltd. Ankireddypalem, Rep by its Managing Director, Mohammad Sikander, S/o. Sawer, Aged 37 years, R/o. N.H. 5 Road, Ankireddypalem, Guntur. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: MR.M.NARENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.RAJA REDDY KONETI The Division Bench of this Court Full text of made the following : Judgment follows 2nd page THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1108 of 2008 JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This writ appeal is filed against order dated 25-02-2008 passed in WP.No.6228 of 2008 whereby the learned single Judge permitted the respondent to pay Rs.30,00,000=00 on or before 19-05-2008 and gave liberty to the appellants to proceed further to recover the balance outstanding amount, if the respondent fails to submit proposals for paying the balance outstanding liability within a period of four months from the date of payment of Rs.30,00,000=00. 2. This writ appeal is taken up for disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties. 3. At the hearing, the learned standing counsel for the appellants submitted that though the respondent has paid Rs.30,00,000=00, he fail to pay the further amount. 4. In our considered view, the directions given by the learned single Judge are unequivocal and it is needless to state that if the respondent has not complied with the later part of the direction in coming out with proposal for clearing the outstanding balance amount, the appellants shall be free to proceed against the respondent for recovery of the balance amount. 5. With these observations, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. 6. As a sequel to disposal of the writ appeal, WAMP.No.2156 of 2008 and WAVMP.No.106 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY 05-3-2009. I s L. ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {VSMI} s