1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2987 OF 2009. AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009. RAMCHANDRA NARAYAN SALOTKAR VS SANJAY DHARMAJI CHUDHARI ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. W. Paunikar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Prashant Shende, Advocate for respondent absent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2010. 1. By the impugned judgment, the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadchiroli has acquitted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 447, 323, 294 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. After appreciating the evidence, the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class has reached the conclusion that the act of trespass with intention to commit an offence has not been proved. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant has taken this Court through the notes of 2 evidence on record, copies whereon are filed with this application. 4. Perusal of testimonies Annexure-B, E & F disclose that the witnesses do not prove the trespass with intention or commission of offence after trespass. The judgment impugned is not perverse or contrary to the evidence on record. 5. No indulgence is called for. 6. Application for leave to appeal and appeal are dismissed. Judge //mule//