IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1093 of 2010 Date of decision: 5th August, 2010 Nirmal Singh … Petitioner Versus Nahar Singh … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. A.K. Kalsy, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Maninder Kaur, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner-landlord, who is a Non-Resident Indian, has filed present revision petition with a prayer that the impugned order dated 15th December, 2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Barnala, whereby leave to contest was granted in favour of the respondent-tenant, be set aside. I have perused the impugned order. This Court while exercising revisional jurisdiction is of the opinion that it should refrain itself from interfering with the discretion rightly exercised by the Rent Controller. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition, provided the Rent Controller, Barnala is directed to decide the eviction petition within a stipulated period. Civil Revision No.1093 of 2010 I find merit in the alternative prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, as prayed, present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Rent Controller, Barnala is directed to decide the eviction petition preferred by the petitioner-landlord within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 5, 2010 rps 2