c,' J-S- HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, (C.G.) M.C.C.No. 6(c) of 2010 An application for restoration ofM.A. No. 1536 of 1998 'IiTITlONER: Claimants 5, 2 to 4 ^.. c .^"[6\^ r. ........^^ i ^^^'y^'v .rtl^^* -•*' ^ • • <><e %•^"' A...--' RESPONDENTS: A'1\^ '/.'» i 1. Smt Raj Rani.Devi, aged about 35 years, W/o Late Jograj Singh; 2. Jagat Narayan , aged about 18 years; 3^. Rocky, aged about 14 years,; 4. Shani alias Rakesh, Aged about 12 years, All sons oflate Jogi Raj Singh; Nos. 3 L9 ase VERSUS 1. Suresh Prasad, S/o Shivanandya Kurmi, R/o Banaras Road, Nagar Ambikiapur, P.S. •& Tahsil Ambikapur, District - Surguja, M.P. (Owner) 2. Gulab Khan, aged 40 years, S/o Udeshi Khan, Truek Driver and resident of Mahamayapara, Nagar Ambikapur, District - Sarguj M.P.( now C.G.) 3. •g< Branch Office, District - Sarguja, C.G.) S. Sevak Singh Ishwar Singh, R/o \J ^J^i. P.S. & •-^ Ambikapur, District Sarguja, M.P. (nowC.G.) (Owner ofvehicles) / Opposite Party 5. Amarjit Singh, aged about 30 years, S/o Pyarelal, Cultivator and resident of village Khurla Kingara, Tahsil and District Jalendhar, At present residing at Vishrampur District - Sarguja, M.P. ( now C.G.) / APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL(M.A. 1536/1998). 3iii?r w !<{-)1+ "(tS?T 3TT?9T'§RI^ Si '3~sr'^tT'TR^!, '^fteng, fs<diy!j,< .^\.4<--......-.4B..' STI^TTW (^qfgq^) TRnwnto sii^i qii<<t"i<iit 'Eiiwff ^ fezt <r<ii<<;ii ^affiTOan^l Division Bench Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal i Hon'bleShri R.L. Jhanwar, 15.11.2010 Ms. Sonia Kutdeep, Advo Heard on application for 1536/1998. Learned counsel appeat|ii that the counsel for the appella^t of bonafide mistake, therefore, was dismissed on 29.09.2010,1 file. j;ate for petitioners. I'estoration of Mlsc. ADpea! No. |ng for the petitloners submits ^ts could not appear on account 11/lisc. Appeai No.1536/98, which may be restored to its original On due consideration, v^ for petitioners is succeeded absence, therefore, the appiicaf No. 1536/98 is restored to its A copy of this order be appeal and the same be listed n e are satisfied that the counsel explaining the cause of his i.on is allowed and Misc. Appeal fi!e. or|gina |3laced on record of the original ftar hearina in the next week. Sd/- N.K.Agarawal Judge Sd/- R.L. Jbanwar Judge