R. S. A. No. 2608 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : R. S. A. No. 2608 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 18, 2011 Pardeep Kumar Malhotra and others .... Appellants Vs. Amar Nath and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. G. S. Jaswal, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : C. M. No. 92-C of 2011 : Allowed as prayed for. C. M. No. 93-C of 2011 and Main Appeal : Appellants have moved C. M. No. 93-C of 2011 alleging that the parties have effected compromise Annexure P-3 and pursuant to compromise, sale deeds Annexures P-4 and P-5 have also since been executed, and therefore, appellants be permitted to withdraw the appeal and decree be passed in terms of settlement. Learned counsel for the appellants R. S. A. No. 2608 of 2010 (O&M) 2 states that since respondents have not put in appearance in spite of service, in view of settlement, which has also been implemented by way of sale deeds, appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. The prayer is allowed. Accordingly, C. M. No. 93-C of 2011 stands disposed of and R. S. A. No. 2608 of 2010 is dismissed as withdrawn. January 18, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE