CRLMB 10269/2009 Samay Singh and others Vs. State (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10269/2009 Samay Singh and others Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 9th February, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Bhandari Mr. Kapil Gupta, for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor. .......... Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. It is stated that if the FIR is looked into then the fire was opened by Vijendra and Mukesh, however, charge-sheet has not been filed against them in connivance with the investigating agency and petitioners are merely charge-sheeted for offence under section 3 of PDPP Act as other offences are bailable one, thus, petitioners may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioners deserve to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioners namely, Samay Singh, Ratti Ram, Bunti @ Bane Singh and Iliyas on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.72/2008 registered at Police Station-Kathumar, District Alwar for offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 435, 336 of IPC and CRLMB 10269/2009 Samay Singh and others Vs. State (2) section 3 of PDPP Act provided each of them, furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (M.N. Bhandari),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D8