IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO.14696 of 2005 Between: 1. Ananda Rao, S/o.late Gurumurthy, Hindu, 54 years, D.No.45-35-50, Jagannadhapuram, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam. 2. G.Rama Bala, W/o.Ananda Rao, 39 years, D.No.45-35-50, Jagannadhapuram, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam. 3. Ch.Anuradha, W/o.Naveen Kumar, 25 years, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office Buildings, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Station House Officer, IV th Town Law and Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent, in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner as highly arbitrary and illegal and as violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents not to call the petitioners day in any day out and interfere with their life and liberty without authority of law. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.T.M.K.CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court at the admission stage made the following: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO.14696 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioners’ grievance is that they have been harassed by the second respondent by being called to the Police Station everyday and are being made to wait thereat for a couple of hours on each occasion. They state that on enquiries, they learnt that the son of the first and the second petitioners is involved in a crime and a crime No.67 of 2005 in the second respondent’s Police Station has been registered against him under Section 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, along with two others. The petitioners state that they have nothing to do with the conduct of the son of the first and the second petitioners and they are not liable to be harassed. They also state that the third petitioner is the daughter who has nothing at all to do with the event and she is also being harassed. The petitioners, at the admission, herein seek a liberty to make a complaint to the first respondent against the second respondent. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. The petitioners may make complaint to the first respondent. It shall be considered expeditiously and in any event within a week from the date of such representation, appropriate administrative action shall be taken by the first respondent. ___________________ (GODA RAGHU RAM, J) 8th July 2005 RRB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //True Copy// SECTION OFFICER Copy To: 1. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office Buildings, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Station House Officer, IV th Town Law and Order Police Station, Visakhapatnam. 3. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. Two CD copies.