Kambli 1 wp255.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.255OF 2006 ... Kanda Batata Adat Vyapari Sangh ...Petitioners v/s. Member Secretary, Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee and ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.U.B.Nighot for the Petitioners. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & K.K.TATED, JJ DATED: 11th February,2011 P.C.: 1. This petition is filed by the Petitioners, which claim to be the Association of wholesale Brokers and commission agents in Onion, Potato and Garlic and are holding licences from the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee. In the petition, the Petitioners have challenged the demand of the Market Committee to recover the amount of Rs. Kambli 2 wp255.06 2,21,62,259/- from the members of the Petitioners. But the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners is not able to show us any document, which will show that the Market Committee has made any demand from the Petitioners. We find that the Market Committee is registered as an employer with the Mathadi Board in relation to Hamal as well as Mapadis and therefore is liable to pay as employer to the Mathadi Board the amounts that are demanded by the Mathadi Board on account of the payment to be made to the Hamals and Mapadis. The Market Committee, in our opinion, will be justified in recovering that amount from the Traders and the Commission Agents, who are their licencees, because it is for their benefit that the services of Hamals and Mapadis are available. We do not find any substance in the petition. Petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)