In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … Civil Writ No. 12029 of 2010 Date of decision: May 12,2011 Pawan Kumar ..Petitioner. Versus The Deputy Commissioner, Panipat and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjit Singh Present: Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Pattar,Sr. DAG,Haryana for the respondent No.1. Mr. J.P.Bhatt, Advocate for respondent No.2 ... Ranjit Singh,J(Oral) Petitioner was employed as a Bar Attendant with Gymkhana Club, Panipat. He has approached this Court against his termination order. In the reply filed, it is stated that petitioner was employed on contract basis and his services are no longer needed. If the petitioner has grievance against his wrongful termination, he may have to take his remedy in accordance with law where he would get opportunity to prove the aspect of his wrongful termination. The petitioner may seek an alternative remedy. No case of invoking writ jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. May 12,2011 (RANJIT SINGH) nk JUDGE