bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2002 M/s.Ronak Dyeing Ltd. ..Applicant Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise ..Respondent Ms.M.P.Phophale i/b. Akshar Laws for applicant. Mr.A.S.Rao for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER,2009 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused the impugned order. 2. Since the appeal itself was dismissed on the ground of limitation, it was not obligatory on the part of the Tribunal to go into the merits of the case. The Tribunal has rightly dismissed the appeal holding it to be barred by limitation. The view taken by the Tribunal is a reasonable and possible view. No fault can be found with the same. Hence, the application stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)