:»'' r- '/-vo^ hi the Honble High Court of Judicature of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P^'N^. 4^B3 2006 \^ ^...-^. 'v.--';^'y''" ^s^^ ^••'-,.^s'1"' ^'ys'9^> ^ '\ ..-•• A^etitioner Respondents Same.-lal Nishad, aged 43 years . Son of Shri Puranik Nishad, Assistant Teacher, Giris Middle School, Village Gotatola, Tribal Block Mohala, District Rajnandgoan (C.G.) Versus 1. The State Gov&mment ofChhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, D.K..S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Education Officer, Mohala / District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) -?.- 6Ac;< (^Jucah'cn^ (r)t-'l-ic<^<' rnol4/t£(. Disf-^- ^.<^^^hd.^cuni Prohibition cmd for other Direction or Directions. XI-HC-78 qi*1CIT8i^ 33T -^MW'i{, W^\WW, (slcll'M^ ^•••^^•..^W^200S 3TT^?T4s|ct> (^i^sl^8)') an^rsRTR.fich (raT3n^?Tst>Hiti Rofri^. tfa g^tITWHf^TSn^T 28.8.2006 Heard Shri Somkant Verrrla, Sumesh Bajaj, Goyernment Advoca|le copy. The case of the petitioner is| and as per the Instnictions dated Assistant Teachers who have pas^ed on their own expenses after 2j increments and order of Gcwernmeitit his B. T.1. examination on his own to that effect is Annexure-P/1, but beneflt whereas, similariy situated increments under the orders of th^ P/3. Having heard learned coun^el facts and circumstances of the casle, merit of the case, the petitioner is along with copy of this petHion Education Officer within a period of Education Officer is directed to of averments made by the petitionet- also. If the District Education situated peisons have been grantefd and the petitioner's case is also cov|er on the basis of Govemment's ordeit, months from today, in accordance v(rith WBh the direction aforesaid, exalnine WTfepfl^ WRTf ir'fe^f rfSpczrc ^srf^q'an^r i, counsef for the petitioner and Shri for the State/ respondents, on advance that he is working as Assistant Teacher (4-12-98 issued by the State of M.P. the B.T.I., B. Ed. and M.Ed. examination '2-10-64 are entitled for two advance is Annexure-P/2. The petitioner passed ;ost in the year 1991-92 and a certiflcate the petitioner has not been given the tiersons have been granted two advance Tribunal and this Court vide Annexure- for the parties, having regard to the i, without expressing any opinion on Ihe ^llowed to make a detailed representation r^ising all his grievances to the District 15 days from today and in turn, District the case of the petitioner in the light e^ in this petition and in the representation reaches to the conduston that similariy the benefrt of two advance increments vjered for grant oftwo advance increments I, then to pass orders within a period of 3 law. (he petition stands disposed of. SdA L.C.Bhadoo Judge V^