IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1728 of 2008 Between: Bandaru Venkata Ratnam ..... PETITIONER AND R.Anasuya .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1728 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.2221/2004 filed by the respondent/plaintiff on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam for recovery of money based on the promissory note said to have been executed by the petitioner/defendant. Thereafter, the petitioner/defendant filed I.A.1201/2007 for sending the promissory note to handwriting expert to examine the same with the signatures of the petitioner/defendant to be taken in the open Court. The said application was dismissed by order dated 30.08.2007 for default. To set aside the said order, the petitioner/defendant filed I.A.1304/2007 which was also dismissed by the Court below by the impugned order dated 11.09.2007. I am of the opinion that I.A.1201/2007 itself is not maintainable as the promissory note cannot be sent for expert opinion to compare the signature thereon with the signatures of the petitioner/defendant taken in open Court. The promissory note can be sent to handwriting expert to compare the signature of the defendant with that of the admitted signatures. Therefore, I do not see any merits in the Civil Revision Petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 11.11.2010 Dsr