IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14318 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR SHAHI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 29.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. As per submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, there was dispute in between this petitioner and Ravindra Singh to whom informant’s brother was working. No harm was caused to the victim boy, nor any demand of ransom. Kidnapped boy disappeared. If his statement is accepted then petitioner’s phuffa informed his family members on telephone then only he was taken by them. According to the learned counsel, it was the dispute in between the petitioner and Ravindra Singh that the informant has been set up by Ravindra Singh to pressurize otherwise. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Jogapatti (Nawalpur) P.S. Case No. 334 of 2004, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)