/ ^ !lngl< W.P. (S) No....^^........2011 1 Krishna Kumar Pandey s/o <^ '^•••" about 60 years Head Master Priniary School Bhainsa Block Bemetara District Diirg (C.G) Deo Singh Kannauje s/o Lakhan Lal Kannauje Aged about 55 years Head Master Prim'ary School Mohlai Block Bemetara District Durg (C.G) The State Gov-t. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Officer, Bemetara Durg, District Durg C.i t -S^ ^W\i^,WS'iWTS, TsRTT^y pQ,) VA-O • ^rtS//1 an^? 'w C^^^') sn^; •a?i 1s:)N' ^qi ;fli<^!'SlfRT TOnw^fean^T tTlT?rf^''T€f'f3^K SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan 11-08-2011 Bhrivastava. J. Shri Somkant Verma, counsel ijor the petitioners. Shri Praveen Das, Deputy Gov^rnment Advocate for the State. With the consent of iearned <tounsel for the parties, the matter is heard Tinaliy. The petitioners were appoint^d as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.1200/- in the year 1998. After s^ccessfuiiy compteting the probation period, they were granted regular pay scale o Rs.4000-6000/-. Learned counsei appearing Ijor the petitioners submits that the issue invoived in the case is as to whetheh the petitioners are entiiied to reguiar pay scaie with effect from the date of DroDation penoa. The issue invoived herein wa^ Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in p.A.No.2745/89 iMadhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State ofM.P. & others), vf'herein, it was heid that the similariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pav) |jp to the Hon'bie Supreme Court in speciai Learned counsei appearing for initial appointment or after completion of considered by the Madhya Pradesh State scaie with effect from the date of initiai appointment. The matter was taken Leave Petition (Civir) No.6892/&3. Th( Supreme Court, upholding the deci^i Teachers/'Assistant Teachers are ent|tied to regular pay scaie from the date of initial appointment. fe said Deiition was dismissed bv the Hon'ble lion of the Tribunai to the efrect that the |the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in F^am Kumar Sahu & others v. State Govt. of fIRRT, lld-IK'll*—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. ¥ y- '^. ':r.^ -;%?raT?P7, ESiTi!y.'i<c. fsi^lwLR .;s(s) t-o- ^&&//1 3nt«?n'-f?^rai' •^•iE^^E ^^tteii -^- •WTffl^'"S'3t7?5r^ •3ifw<"^ Deepii Chhattisgarh & another, W.P.(S).No|.813 of 2007, by order dated 12/0'2/2007, has granted reguiar pay scaie with effectjfromthe date of initial appointment. Learned counsei appearing for the parties jointly submit that ihe case is squareiy covered by the decision ofjthis Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu & Others v. State Govt. of Chhattisgati & another (supra). In view of that, this petitiorj is aliowed on the same terms, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order aslto costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge