IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.31 of 2008 BIBI AFROZA KHATOON @ AAKO Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03 06.01.2009 The application for condonation of delay has been filed vide I.A.No. 1086 of 2008. It has been submitted that delay is about 29 days. For the reasons set out in the application seeking condonation of delay, this court is satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the present application (I.A.No.1086/2008) stands allowed. This application throws challenge to the judgment and order of acquittal recorded by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Purnea whereby the opposite party no.2 herein (Shaikh Ainul) has been tried and acquitted of the charge leveled under Section 376 of the Penal code. This court perused the impugned judgment, particularly, the reasons set out at paragraph no.43 of the impugned judgment. If on the basis of available evidence two views can reasonably be drawn and the trial court has taken a view, the same cannot be said to be illegal warranting interference by allowing this application seeking leave to appeal. This court finds no good reasons to allow this 2 application. The same is accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)