1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.6118 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 R.Solaiammal : Petitioner Vs. The Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Services of Family Welfare, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. : Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent made in Ref.No.1603/SC/11, dated 25.03.2011 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathishkumar For Respondent : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Special Government Pleader ORDER Mr.B.Pugalendhi, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition challenging the impugned order of the respondent dated 25.03.2011, an order of suspension. 4. It is stated that the petitioner's daughter-in-law, the de facto complainant made a false claim and hence, a case has been registered against the petitioner and her husband and her son under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No.3 of 2011. In pursuant to the said registration of case, the petitioner was arrested and detained in prison. Later, the petitioner was placed under suspension. Since it is a family quarrel, the petitioner cannot be kept under suspension. 5. However, I am of the considered view that these facts have to weigh in the mind of the authority, who has passed the order of suspension and not by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. Taking such view, I am inclined to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2011, which has been sent for revoking the order of suspension. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to consider the said representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2011 and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Services of Family Welfare, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. +1CC TO M/S.S.SATHISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE SR.18365 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.18527 Sml SR : 22.06.2011 : 2p/4c Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6118 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/