IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.($) NO. IBéO of 2010 {PETITIONER Dhr'uwa Prasad GupTa, aged abouf 63 years, S/o La’re Shri ‘CRam Gupta, Refired Developmen’r Ex'fension Officer a’r Janpad Panchaya’r Gourelu (Pendr‘a Road), DisfricT-Bilaspur' (6.6.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS H 1. STaTe of ChhaTtisgar‘h Through :- The Secrefar‘y, PanchayaT & Rural Developmenf Deparfmen’r Depar’rmen’r, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur‘ (C.G.) / 2. The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) Bilaspur', The Collecfor, Disiricf—Bilaspur‘ (C.G.) /4. The Chief Execu’rive Officer, District Panchaycn‘ 'Biiaspur, Disiricf—Bilaspur (6.6.) The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat South Bastar (Dantewada), /6. The Chief Executive Officer, Block Gourela (Pendra Road), District-Bilaspur (6.6.) @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B3LASPUR ' ' WRIT PETITION (S) NO 1360 01‘2015 Dhruwa Prasad Gupta, . Peiitioner Versus Resnondent .‘ V; State of Chhatusgarlw: others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 9F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish kAgnihotri, J.) , Preséhg? ShnAmISmgh Rajput Advocam fortheapet‘honarl, ' Shn VV S Moorthv, Denutv Advecme General afor ihe Smte ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 31‘ of March, 2010) With the consent of learned coursel appearing for the parties, me matter is heard finally, 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, - being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2, This Court, in the matter of WP. No. 46422004 (8aljnath Manda! v. The State of Chhata‘sgam & 0&513) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiret dues a the disputed question of facts were involved. ’The Committee was constituted by the State Government pursuant to the order dated 19 06 2006 passed in W P No 1961/2006 pint Kaja Bat Chandiakar Vs smte Govemment and othels) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (Smte .of Chhattisgam & Otters v. Baiinam Mandel and another). ‘Thusr'this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and- order dated 31“ of January, 2008 passed in. W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baljnam Manda! (supra) as submitted by teamed counsel appearing for the mrdea. 3. With the consent of the parties, this petition is aecordingiy disposed of in the same terms ie the office of the Advocate General Is directed to send the case to the Committee, Within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the \petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue .g,