'• C-'^le^T^- wu^--^i~i' IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION(S)NO. ^-C /200frtf7 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTIQN QFJNDLA, PETITIONER ^^- ^.- ^ ..••••":%^v-:-:< -A " ' ^.'" l'-" .<^: ./••" ^^•""'L——^-.— s^ RESPONDENTS &' 1. EiD-^o?l A^ Mv ^w^ ^ l^\.G.8 •• 9^\a^ ,-Smt. Shashikala Bhagat, aged about 42 years, wife of Shri Nageshwar Ram Bhagat, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Girls Primary School Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. 'IL '-" HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fStfsto. 117 of 2007 Petitioners : Mansingh Khande and others Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh and o-thers W. P.fSl No. 118 of 2007 Petitioners : Tejram Bha9ttt ond o-thers Versus Respondents : State of Chhattis9arh ond others W. P.fS) No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanjay Kumar Sinha Versus . ftespondents : State of Chhatt'isgttrh ond ono'ther W. P.(S) No. 126 of 2007 Petitioner : Bhuvneshwcr Prosod Pradhon Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers W. P.(S) No. 127 of 2(X)7 Petitioner : Kulranjan Etdta Versus Respondents : Stort-e of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.(S) No. 128 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond another W. P.(S) No. 129 of 2007 Petitioner : PhilosAkshay AAukut Tig9a Versus Respondents ; Stat®of Chhatfris9arh and another W. P.fS) No. 130 of Z007 Petitioner : Smt. Prosodi Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond anolher W. P.(S) No. 131 of 2007 PetH-ioner : Sagar Sai Versus Respondents : State of Oihatt'isgarh ond others W. P.fS) No. 133 of 2007 Petitioner : . Inus Bek Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt-isgarh ond onother W. P.(S\ No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Balircun Bhcgat Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh and another W. P.fS) No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chandra Xolco Versus Respondents : State of Chhatl-is9<xrh and others W. P.fS) No. 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shofihikala Bhogat Versus Re^ondents : State of Oihafisgarh ond another W. P fS) No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhanduram 090* Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and onother W. P.fS) No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementina Tigga Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-is9orh and onother W. P.(S\ No. \45 of 2007 Petitmner : Krishna Ram Patel Versus Respondents : State ofChhattis9arh ond o-thers W. P.fS^No. 147ofa)07 Petitioner : Laxminarayan Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S) No. 149 of 2007 Petitkwier : Smt. Maxi Miliyoni Toppo Versus Re^wmlents : State of Chhattisgarh ond ano-ther W. P.(S) No. 150 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt.Rajmoni Versus Respondents : State of Chhartisgarh and o-thers W. P.IS) No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Ouimru ftam Ncgdeo Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.fSl No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner : fianesh Ram Pradhon Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond onother W. P.(S) No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotelal Khanna Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S) No. l of 2007 Petitioner : RamkumoB'Choudhari Versus Respondents : State of Chhatfris9<M+i and ano-ther And W P.fS) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohdn Nayak Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh ond another SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Ayuhotri. J Present: Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovemment Advooate, Mr. Arvind Dubey. Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for 1+ie respondents/Stort'e. ORDER (Passed on this 17tlt Doy of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counset appearing for •the petitk>ners as well as for •the S'tate/respondents jointly submit -tlwt the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to thut of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiunri and others vs. Stdte Sovemment of Chhatt-iS9arh & others), which was allouied vide order dated 7.11.2006. They •(ur'ther submit •that the question of ku»nvolved is also Ihe some. 2. In view of the obove-stated submissions mnde by leamed counsel for the porties, these writ petitions are allowed m terms of the order chted 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in WJ>. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State fiovemment of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. Subhash 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in o-ther cormected writ petition. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge