./' t.<? IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR PETETIONER ^ .^^/ .^^y •^>~'.-''_d/-''. \.y ..•A'.KC:''~<^-'"' f^y" ^' ,s>- »" RESPONDENTS W.P. (C) N0. 9.'Z'^5/2011 Harijan Machhuwa Sahakari Samiti, Marayadit, Nadeli, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) (Registration No. 151/1995) through - Its president Ramanand Tandon, S/o Shri Hari Ram Tandon, aged about 54 years, R/o Ward No. 1, Harijan Mohalla, Sakti, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretar-y, Agriculture (Fisheries) bepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, bistrict; Raipur (C.6.). 2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa . Distt. -Janjgir-Champa (.C.G.) 3. Director, Fisheries, Raipur Distt.-Raipur (C.6.) 4. The Assistant Director, Fisheries Department, Janjgir, Distt.-Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) 5. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sakti, Distt. -Janjgir- Champa (C.6.) ^- 6. The President, Nagar Patika Parishad, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) ,-'' WRIT PETCTEON UNbER ARTECLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONJOF INDIA, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT__PETITION.(C) N0.2275 OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Harijan Machhuwa Sahakari Samiti Marayadit Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.K. Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (Passedonthis21stdayof0ctob6r,2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application to decide the dispute involved in the instant petition on 7-2-2011 (Annexure - P/1) to the respondent No.2, however, the same has not been decided, though more than 8 months have elapsed. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that under the scheme, the Collector has no jurisdiction, as he is an appellate authority, however, the decision shall be taken on the abovestated application, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks, in accordance with law and on its own merits. 4. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agi Judge