^- ^5f tfl' g, ^ % li' p. t>>): jw/ f3\ I: 150- ^ t s---]^!.^ •^^^"""•"——•. ^ s y^ ^ s^y yl F <; .fj.t tl.i »,» +^3 H ^*^n •\»^ ss?* £?» ft so §:•&» •i-" »«3t-l »&: "' 8" s' ^s.:& 8 ,^ ^^^n -t~ o-^. \s, "^ a"' 3' ' M S" S o f5 tliit^ ifii.1: e;si. HIGH eQUKr OE GHHATTISQARH AT BILASEHR WRITPETITIONCONo. 1467 of2009 PETmONER. : Smt. Lila Devr. :'^:1::^'VERSUS',. .; :.'•.. ,;1:.< \.'';:.::.":-. l,: ;-RESPONDENTS :NaearPatiKNteam;Raipur.'. ^ ^"^^SPEHEO^I.J^EK^RtBS]:; CONSTFFUTIGN OF INE>IA SB:Hon?BIe:8WrSatisUK.Aenffiwtn,J. PreseiBt:'ShriSaiijayS.A^awal,Adyocate&rthepetitioner.^^^'^^ , Shri KasBifShakeel, Adyocate ibr the respondenf. , ORDERfORAL) :-:- ^ (Pa&sed.6h.Oast:dayoKe^obe^'20ie}' ?-.'^^^^^^^^-^ :, I. Learned counsel :apgeanng fbr^'^ ,;^.petiti6ner was'in.QCcupatton^f&'plot^adrHefisui ; : • lat TeliteandUa,I^ip^flstieiiem;;sli^iw^i;ti^^ ,. .fyrtUe&.submitslltBa|RaBjg|£|M.!^^ ,^^.^^^Qtice|M!B9|3|W|^i^|||^UJxi»j^ a^l;y?i^an::ien@Mei^F|iB^ :.y •1iWis.>'IMype6&3n^^ reS]x>ndent-Cbrporationfbralk)tment6faltemativeshop. 2. -Ttie respohderrt-C^rp&TMion &y memc) dated M P/l) decidedthatt6e shop owners wlteliadftielr^shops betweenN^ ^. , ~Bhag^; ^Singli';'(3iowk.^o; 'Rajlway;?eross% widenmg'of GJ3; I^ '/gi^ed shops.of equal sizes on prior^ - ^etitioner has'prefeiTed Ais^^^^^^p^ ' respondent-CQrporati6n;^i^abilitatingthe-p^ fi-orit of Sand^sti Press OB tfie ayailable Nazul Larid af Tetibandita^ as ^per memo ;dated 01.02.3Q()9 ;and^l;urther eomRensate^ ttie: petitioner suitablyfcrdeprivmglimi-ftamUislrvelihood/^^^^^^^^ ^ • 3. ,Shri Kashif S]Mked,'teai-ned'^ sufimits that'ffieCorporaHon.has.al^ ^•rpetitionerat:3^1ibaiidK»©^ .(^nnexi^ iyi) v^cK is.imder^^^TO submitsthatmasuifBtedbypneShivPrasad^osKitieforclteecot^ B. E.T Ii::t LI|i?i K:l; 111 x'i !fii Artiti !l;»..i :•• ^^'sn-3: , 4AeivU'Judge,'Glass^Raipw^^^ leamed Judge, by order dated 18.01.2010 (Annexure R/2), has stayed the construction of the cbmmercial cotnplex at Telibandlia, wherem ^the sliiop has 6een allotted to. the petitioner. 4. ShriAgrawalttearnfidcounselappearingforthe.petitipnersubmitslliat it is not clear from tUe -order dated 18.01.2010, "asto whefhei- tihie constri^ion ofthe c6mmercial;eQmplex whereinliies^ ,v allotfe3 to thepetitiQner, Kas been stayed bythe oi-der of the 4 .Givil ; 'Judge, Glass;;I,Raipur..' • '••^^.^^' • : • , ^ • 5; Be that as it may, the resppndent-Gorporatipn has irtade a suhmission .OHthebasisoffheafBdavildated 16.09.2010, andfhCT^ ; npt to^belrevB the afEdavit. Smce the matter'is already MbjHffi^ befbre the competent^civil'CQurt,npinfer: encei&;warra^ '• stage as^the' responde^-^rporati^^hasialready^^ Te^aaSj^^ viS^^wsm^]^.^:Va^^ ;';,;account,Oferder^a^e|^l^'Gourt- low. 51'; :"^^ . 6.^'EbBs,}at^tKis^stage,.nofhing surviyes in this^ adjudieatioh. . Howeyer, siiice the •mater^is'pendingconsideratidn.,Beforethe . eompetent Civil Coyrt, Ii6erty is reserved to the petiticmer^to take appropriate steps,; if so~ advised, either m fhe pending civil suit oi- , '.ofherwise.^deCfhe^provisionsQflaw. .. ^ ^ !. 7. In regard fo:^t^er for grant^of Gompensafion, th&^^s^ granted :as fletermmation .of compensation reqmres setfl^e^ dtspyted question pffects and the loss, if any to the petitioner. Thus, fhis Court is nof passing.any order. Howeyer, it is' operi to the ^ petitk)nertota]ffi;apRropriate'Tecotffse'as:permissibl& /^l;so.advise(l.;''. ; ''••?-' •-..'.•.• . ' ; •:';: •l.'-:"''-:-::. :•-.•'-' &: .Ia..yiew 6f the above, the , 1 afbresfatedliberty,ifsDadYise<l. ;' "^ __ ^ Satish K-Agnihotri Judge