IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.657 of 2011 Kapil Deo Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Kamal Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Adv. For the State : Mr. Lalal Kumar, AC to G.P. 26. 2 16.09.2011 The petitioner / accused Kapildeo Singh has invoked the writ jurisdiction confining his submission that a time frame be made to dispose of the trial arising out of Barahiya P.S. Case No. 51/2008 pending before Sub-Divisional Magisrate, Lakhisarai. The aforesaid prayer has been made in the background of closing of prosecution case and then having it reopened on a prayer of prosecution made under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. vide order dated 07.05.2011 and since thereafter, as has been submitted, no P.W. has been produced. Therefore, submission is that there has been utter misuse of extraordinary power vested to court by way of Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. by the prosecution. The learned Assistant Counsel to G.P. 26 submitted that he will take care of the present situation and will direct the concerned authorities to have the witnesses examined at an earliest. Taking into account the submission of the learned Assistant Counsel to G.P. 26, petition is disposed of at this stage itself expecting that the State will take all possible steps to get the matter disposed of at an earliest. Simultaneously the court will also see that frequent adjournment in a routine manner should not be given. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)