:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2665 OF 2005 Vasim Rauf Khan and another ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.Sangeeta Bhole, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 3rd May 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. As the Applicants were accosted on the spot while preparing for committing dacoity and the trap was conducted on specific information received in that behalf, coupled with the fact that the Applicant No.2 was found in possession of chopper and iron Katavani, not a case for bail. The argument that no recovery of :2: any weapon is made from the Applicant No.2 is of no avail because all the accused were accosted on the spot. Having regard to the seriousness of the offence, not a case for bail. Rejected. . As prayer for bail is rejected, the Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag, is directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, if not already done, in order to ensure early disposal of the trial. If the Fast Track Court is not available for any reason, the trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the trial and dispose of the same as High Court Expedited Case. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)