IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.253 of 2008 Sudarshan Kumar Rai Versus Gulashan Kumar & Ors ----------- 3. 03.08.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel on behalf of the opposite party no.1 submits that the present revision application is not maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 115 C.P.C. as well as the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others, reported in (2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675 as well as by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar. The petitioner is permitted to convert this Civil Revision into a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within four weeks failing which this Civil Revision shall stand rejected as not maintainable without further reference to a Bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)