{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.768 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.292 OF 2010 Dr.Nagnath s/o Laluji Kottapalle & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.S.Thombre, Advocate for applicants Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 23rd February 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard. Issue notice. Learned APP accepts notice for respondent No.1 and Mr.Jadhavar accepts for respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed affidavit in reply to the present application. 3. By this application the applicant seeks permission to produce two documents on record, which are enlisted along with a separate list. According to learned counsel for respondent No.2, so far as these documents are concerned, it is a matter of evidence {2} and required to be considered at the time of trial and hence he opposed the application. 4. Considering the submissions, it is clear that the complaint is lodged alleging in respect of service of order dated 30.09.2009 and when the complainant entered in the chamber of applicant No.1, where applicant No.2 and one Manza were present, the alleged incident took place. A basic question is raised as to when the order dated 30.09.2009 was served on respondent No.2, complainant and to that effect, information is collected from the institute where respondent No.2 is serving. The said documents are now annexed along with a separate list with a prayer to allow production of the same and be taken into consideration while deciding the matter. 5. Considering the fact that these documents would play vital role in deciding the criminal applications, though vehemently opposed by learned counsel for respondent No.2, yet for just decision of the matter, these documents are necessary and hence requires to be taken on record. 6. In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln768-10 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 292 OF 2010 Dr.Nagnath s/o Laluji Kottapalle & Another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 293 OF 2010 Ishwarsing s/o Raibhan Manza APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.S.Thombre, Advocate for applicants Mr.N.R.Shaikh , APP for respondent State Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, Advocate for respondent No.2 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 23rd February 2010 PER COURT: 1. As the learned counsel for applicant has filed documents on record at this stage, though initial address of the applicant is over yet opportunity needs to be given to learned counsel for respondent no 2 to file additional affidavit in reply, if any. At the request of learned counsel for respondent No.2, S.O. to 26.02.2010. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln768-10