IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2008 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8842 of 2008(C) ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP.21/07 IN OS.318/1998 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANACHERRY ..................................... PETITIONER: ----------------- SARADA, W/O.SREEDHARAN, AGED 68, PUTHUPARAMBIL, THRIKODITHANAM KARA, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. MOHANAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 55, MAZHUVANCHERIL PUTHUPARAMBIL, KADAMANCHIRA, THRIKKODITHANAM, CHANGANACHERRY. 2. PANKIAMMA, W/O.KRUPPAN, ASWINI SADANAM, PARAL KARA, VAZHAPPALLY WEST, CHANGANACHERRY. 3. CHINNAMMA KURIAN, KAYAPURATHU PUTHUPARAMBIL, THRIKKODITHANAM, CHANGANACHERRY. 4. MOHANAN, MEZHUVANCHERIL PUTHUPARAMBIL, THRIKKODITHANAM KARA, CHANGANACHERRY. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 8842 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of March, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is preferred to adjourn the delivery of the property in E.P.21/07 of the Munsiff Court, Changanacherry till Exts.P3 and P4 plans are considered and disposed of. A second appeal is filed before this Court as R.S.A. and now the grievance is that RSA could not be moved on account of a petition to condone the delay of 690 days is pending. I am not at all going to interfere for the reason that a matter is pending before this Court in the second appeal. The remedy for the party is to move that Court to get an early disposal of the applications. Therefore this Court is not expected to act under Article 227 of the Constitution to facilitate the petitioner to get an order from that Court after condoning the delay. This is a practice which cannot be appreciated and therefore this writ petition is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-