IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 642 OF 2009 MS. TEMLA ARCADIA GOMES PINTO ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA AND 4 ORS. ... Respondent Mr. Amey Kakodkar,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.Chopdekar, Advocate holding for Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for Respondent no.5. Mr. S.S.Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. S.D. Padiyar, Advocate for Respondent no.4. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 22nd February, 2010 P.C: Heard. 2. The Petitioner claims to be a 'letter of intent holder' from Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (HPCL) Limited for retail outlet dealership of HPCL. 3. The Petitioner has raised objection to the order dated 1/09/2009 passed by the competent authority i.e the Additional District Magistrate, North Goa District granting N.O.C for storage of petroleum products to Bharat Petroleum. 4. It is noticed that Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited is not an aggrieved party in the present proceeding.The Petitioner's locus to challenge the impugned order is questioned. The Petitioner, a "letter of intent" holder, in our view, could not maintain this petition. 5. In the facts of the case we are not inclined to exercise our extraordinary writ jurisdiction. 6. The petition is dismissed. NARESH H. PATIL, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ap/-