RSA 1501 of 2005 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1501 of 2005 Date of Decision: 06.11. 2008 Satpal ...... Appellant Versus Chotti Devi ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Anil Kshetarpal, Advocate for the respondent. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent for recovery of an amount of Rs. 61,600/- on the basis of a pronote executed by the appellant. The only point raised by learned counsel for the appellant si that he had moved an application Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for additional evidence before the lower Appellate Court and actually the same was dismissed after the dismissal of the appeal, even though it was recorded that the same was dismissed prior to the decision of the appeal. I am afraid that it will not be possible for me to accept this contention which goes RSA 1501 of 2005 2 contrary to record. Even on merits of the said application it has to be noticed that not only was the appellant not able to substantiate the requirements of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC, the same were not even pleaded. In this view of the matter there was no infirmity in rejecting the application of the appellant for additional evidence to produce document expert. Once this matter is out of way the only thing which remains is that both the Courts below have found as a fact that the appellant had executed a pronote and the findings have not been shown to me to be so perverse as to be held to be not arising from the material before the Courts below. Consequently I hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in the present appeal and the same is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 06, 2008 sunita