IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR FC.G.1 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^f 3' CJ | / 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^y ..-•"".^'" .^"\ ^'^"./•^ Bharat Lal Sahu S/o Sri Shyamta Prasad Sahu Aged-about 44 years, Book Attendant (Pustakalay Paricharak), Government polytechnic, Korba [C.G.] VERSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Technical education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2. Director, Directorate of Technical Education, Chhattisgarh, Government Girls' Polytechnic Campus, Byron Bazar, Raipur [C.G.] ^3. Additional Director, Directorate of Technical Education, Chhattisgarh, Government Girls' Polytechnic Campus, Byron Bazar, Raipur [C.G.] 4. Principal, Government Polytechnic, Korba, Distt.- Korba [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTIONS COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT'BIL.^PUR SB : HON'BLB MR. J'USTICE PR1TINKBR P'ETITIONBR ISEBPONDENTs W.P.fSI.NO. 7391/2011 Bharat Lal. Saliu versiis State of Chhattisgarh & Otliers Shri D.R.Patel, counsel for the petitioner. ShriYashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICL1S 226 OF THE CONSTETUTIOH OF IHDSA ORDBR (08.12.2011) Counsel for ffae petitioner submits that though flie petitionei* has been proraoted to fhe post of Assistant Grade III but fhe benefit of tlie said order has not been granted to hiin, He subniits that at this stage, he m.ay be permitted to withdraw tliis petition however, direction niay be issued to the respondent No.2 for decidtag the pendiag representation {Annexure P/5) ofthe petitioxier, State counsel siAniits that let fhe petitioner raake a fresh representation to fhie respondent No.2 appnsiiig the said autAority aboiit ail the detsils and in. tum his representation would be decided in accordance with law siibject to fhe eHgibiUty of fhe petitiorser. Accordmgly, fhe petitioner is permitted to withdraw tbis petition. Needless to state tliat in ftie eventuaMty of inakiiig aoy fresh representation by tlie petitioner the same would be dealt with in accordaiice with law as expeditiously as possible. The petition is fhus dismissed as withdrawn. It is inade cleai' th.at this court has not expressed any opiiiioii ou the mexits of the ca.se and tlie autliorifry concenied would be at libei^ to decide the representation stdctty in. accordance with law. Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge