1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAW) No. 1822 of 2010 in Writ Petition No. 3489 of 2008 Purushottam Marotrao Kalbhut ..VERSUS.. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee and another =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Mr. P.S.Wathore, Advocate for Applicant/respondent no.3 Mr. G.R.Agrawal, Advocate H/f Mr.V.V.Bhangade, Adv. for petitioner Mr. S.M.Puranik, Advocate for respondent no.1. C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 21st July, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the petitioner/non-applicant. By this Civil Application, respondent no.3 has prayed for early date of hearing of the writ petition. We have perused the order dated 24/11/2008 so also the order dated 22/3/2010. By order dated 22/3/2010, the prayer of the applicant for early date of hearing was rejected. Keeping that in view and considering that the writ petition is of 2008, it is not possible to fix the same for final hearing at this stage. Hence, civil application is rejected. 2 However, liberty to the applicant to apply for fixed date of hearing after six months. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale