IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10505 of 2011 UDAY MISHRA SON OF MAHENDRA MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(X) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The accusation is that the petitioner did not allow the informant to prepare mid-day meal for the children and abused the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the investigation, the accusation was found false and final form was submitted but differing with the same, the cognizance has been taken in the matter. The petitioner was under training at different at the relevant time. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 91/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)