- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No.418 of 2007 In Appeal (L) No.72 of 2007 In Chamber Summons No.1013 of 2006 In Execution Application No.175 of 1994 In Summary Suit No.552 of 1975 M/s.Maharashtra Building Materials Suppliers. .. Appellant Vs. Movanbai widow of Pyarchand Jain & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri R.A.Thorat for the Appellant in support of the Notice of Motion. Shri S.A.Yadav for Respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(d). None for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Taken on board on reqeust. 2. Heard the learned advocate for the appellant and Respondent No.1(a) to 1(d). None present for Respondent Nos.2 and 3, though served. - 2 - 3. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, sufficient cause being shown for the delay of 8 days in filing the appeal, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The Notice of Motion accordingly is disposed of. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J) ( DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J)