IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13282 of 2010 1. Singasan Kumhar, Son of Late Murali Kumhar. 2. Butan Kumhar. 3. Bigau Kumhar. 4. Haribansh Kumhar, all sons of late Sahbir Kumhar, all residents of Village- Patna, P.S. Belaon, District-Kaimur at Bhabua..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...........................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 11.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.2 who has been arrested. Permission is accorded. The application is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner no.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 307 and other provisions of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both sides are neighbours and for dispute of partition the occurrence took place. The injuries are simple in nature and no case under Section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out and rests of the offences are bailable. I am not inclined to grant 2 anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, on surrender the learned court below will consider the fact that both sides are neighbours, injuries are simple in nature and the allegations are omnibus and general in nature and try to dispose off of the bail application of the petitioners preferably on the same day. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)