IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.496 of 2011 MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH S/O KAAMESHWAR PD. SINGH R/O VILL- REPURA RAMPUR BALLI PS- SARAIYA DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR----------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECY. LABOUR RESOURCES DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE CHAIRMAN, B.P.S.C. 15 BAILEY ROAD,PATNA 4. THE SECY., BPSC. 15 BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY SECY. BPSC., 15 BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 6. THE EXAMINATION CONTROLLER-CUM-ADDITIONAL SECY. B.P.S.C.15 BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 7. THE HEAD SECTIONAL OFFICER, DIRECT RECRUIT SECTION B.P.S.C. 15-BAILEY ROAD, PATNA---RESPONDENTS ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr.K.N.Jha, Advocate For B.P.S.C.: Mr. P.N.Shahi, Advocate & Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate For the State: Mr. D.K.Prasad, G.P.7 ----------- 3 1.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is yet another writ application by disgruntled candidate who did not make it to the selection list prepared by the Bihar Public Service Commission for appointment on the post of Principal and Vice Principal in the Industrial Training Institutes, Bihar. According to petitioner he has the marks and he has the experience for being invited for interview but the respondent authority had played with his career or his future. Counter affidavit on behalf of the BPSC has been filed. Besides denying other assertions the status of the petitioner has been stated in detail in paragraph-13. According to statement made therein the petitioner was considered under the general category. He has 63.08% marks in B.E. (Electronics). He has annexed certain certificates showing experience but those experience do not seem to be inconformity with the advertisement - 2 - as the experience relates to some kind of teaching done by the petitioner in a coaching as well as some training in I.C.I.C.I Bank. None of them can be termed to be experience of supervisory kind in a factory for more than a year. The second statement is that marks for the general category candidates stopped at 70.58%. There is big gap between the percentages of marks which the petitioner has vis-a-vis the last candidate who got in from the general category. This gap cannot be filled up by this Court or the B.P.S.C. This writ application therefore has been filed not on the basis of any substantive discrimination practiced against him but more on illusory kind of discrimination which the petitioner feels. This writ application is dismissed in the above circumstance as being devoid of merit. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)