IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.7H§}Of 2011 PETITIONER‘ @a Ram Thakur S/o Shri Barsan I t.‘$ ‘II‘ Ram Thakur, ag€d about 62 years, U.D .T. , Govt. Middle School Raunda, Block Dhamdha, Dist-Burg (C.G.) VERSUS fuh‘e State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaly, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, /Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, District — Durg, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA : 1 T mm ’ .% x . wfé>h°9uig ”200 anémm (Wu) ammfaaia: mmm mmm mmuiwm ammm i finally. With the consent of iearn d counsei for the parties, the matter is heard SB : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Mahgn Shrivastava, J. 09-1 2-2011 Shri S.K.Thomas, counseif r the petitioner. Shri Chandresh Shrivastav , Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. Learned counsel appearin for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether, th petitioner is entitied to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initial appoi tment or after compietion of probation period. The issue involved he’rein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in 0.A.No.2745i89 (Madhukant Yadu and 55 others v. State of MP. & othe ), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initlai appointment. it is not disputed by both he parties that the matter was taken up by the State to the Apex Court but the appeal was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision of the Tr bunal to the effect that the teachers i Assistant Teachers are entitled for reg lar pay scale from the date of their initial appointment. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make representation raising all his grievances, in the ligh of the aforesaid judgment and order dated rned respo‘ndent is directed to consider the case 05/011201 1 , and in turd, the con on its own merits’and its perspe tive. if the petitioner stands on the same footing as per order passed by the'S te Administrative Tribunal in Madhukant Yadu (Supra) and subsequently con rmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave arm‘m rash: gamma umiauramrs/i wand/201 1—4 ,so,ooo. dmqwfcram 3211mm Deepii Petition (Civil) No.6892/93 by orde, to same reiief accordingiy It is expected from the St: scrutmy of the fads In View of foregoing, this pe‘:ition is finally disposed off. f |r dated 0301/95, the petitioner may be entitled lte authorities to pass suitable order after due Sd/- Mamndra Mohan Shrivastava Judge QWSia'H FMTH QWIé’I ('31:! a‘llFwr—l Sll40e-w2/201 1———1 50 000