IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.11981-M of 2010 Date of Decision:11.11.2010 Deepak .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.299 dated 28.11.2008 registered under Sections 307/34 IPC and 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Sampla, Tehsil and District Rohtak. It is not disputed that the petitioner was named only in the disclosure statement made by the co-accused in another FIR. Even otherwise, even as per the disclosure statement, the only role attributed to the petitioner is that he was driving the said vehicle. No injury is attributed to him. He is in custody since 15.4.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. 11.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE