1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1636 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 1144 OF 2000 Union of India ...Plaintiffs vs. Suresh Jayantilal Thanawala & & Ors. ...Defendants Mr.S.R. Rajguru with Ms.Nisha Valani for the Plaintiffs. Mr.Brijesh Upadhyay i/b. M/s.Purnanand & Co. for Defendant Nos.1 and 2. Mr.D.G. Rangres for Defendant No.3. Mr.Vachan Bodke i/b. M/s.Chitnis Vaithy & Co. for Defendant Nos.4 to 7 and 9 and 10. Mr.Swapnil Bangar i/b. M/s.Vinod Mistry & Co. for Defendant Nos.9(a) to (i). Mr.D.A. Nalwade, Government Pleader with Mr.Ravindra A. Lokhande, AGP for the State. with NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 357 OF 2001 IN SUIT NO. 2578 OF 2000 Union of India ...Plaintiffs vs. Shantikumar D. Majithia & Ors. ...Defendants with NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2671 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 2932 OF 2000 Union of India ...Plaintiffs 2 vs. Rusi Cawasji Trombaywalla & Ors. ...Defendants CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 1, 2009 P.C. :- This Chamber Summons is taken out by the plaintiff seeking amendment of the plaint as per schedule of amendment annexed to the Chamber Summons. The plaintiff wants to delete prayer clause (a) in the suit and to add para 40(A) to 40(E). Counsel for the defendants has no objection if the said amendment is carried out. Chamber Summons, accordingly, is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. Additional written statement, if advised, to be filed within four weeks thereafter. (V.M. KANADE, J.)