IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1608 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1608 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1608 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 972 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 972 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 972 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Gauri Godse for the appellants. Mr. S.S.Kanetkar for respondent Nos. 1, 2/1 to 2/6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 6th July, 2007 : 6th July, 2007 : 6th July, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Considering the findings given by the Trial Court while answering issue No.3, that plaintiff/ appellant is not in possession of the property, therefore, there is no case and reason to pass any ad interim order as prayed in this Civil Application. The Civil ( 2 ) Application is therefore, rejected in view of the above findings given by the trial Court. 2. The Civil Application is disposed off, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.] V.MOHTA, J.] V.MOHTA, J.]