IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31020 of 2008 1. AMIRULLAH 2. MOIN ALAM 3. MD. FARID 4. ROKAIDA KIHATOON 5. HALIMA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners 1 to 3 are the brother-in-laws of the deceased. Petitioners 4 & 5 are the wives of Petitoners 1 & 2. They apprehend arrest in a Police case registered under Sections 304 B of the Penal Code in which charge sheet has been submitted under Section 306 of the Penal Code. The deceased was stated to be one day before the death apprehensive. The post-mortem report is of hanging. Whether it be Section 306 or 304B of the Penal Code that makes no difference. Co-accused mother-in-law has been enlarged on regular bail. The application is rejected in so far as petitioners 1 to 3 are concerned. Considering that petitioners 4 & 5 are ladies standing in the position of daughter-in-law themselves like the deceased, let them surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad in Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 87 of 2007. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)