IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33105 of 2010(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SREE PULINKAVU AYYAPPA KSHETHRA PUNARUDHARANA COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE MEMBER NARAYANANKUTTY M., AGED 37, S/O.KUNJUNNY, MANGATTIL HOUSE, PUNCHAPADAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH). RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KOZHIKODE-673 005. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE-678 001. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, PALAKKAD-678 001. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE PULINKAVU AYYAPPA KSHETRAM, PUNCHAPADAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. THE INSPECTOR, OTTAPALAM DIVISION, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, CHERUPULASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 001. W.P.(C). NO.33105/2010-K: 7. GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O.RAMANKUTTY GUPTAN, ERAKATTIL, PUNCHAPADAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 678 001. R1 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. R. LAKSHMI NARAYAN, R2 TO R4 & R6 ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No. 33105 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2010. JUDGMENT Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J, The petitioner earlier filed a writ petition, in which Ext.P4 judgment was issued. We do not find any reason why the Government was not abiding the directions contained therein, which included a direction to consider any request for interim order having regard to the gravity of the allegations and the fact that the seventh respondent therein had been kept out of the activities involved in the temple. It is stated that the application for interim order was filed sometime in August. 2. Learned Senior Government Pleader states that the application for interim relief will be considered and orders issued within a period of three weeks. This WPC.33105/2010. 2 submission is recorded. No further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The writ petition is ordered accordingly requiring the State Government to act in terms of what is stated by the learned Senior Government Pleader. Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.