IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11636 of 2009 Between: M/s Sayeedia Fruit Company, Shop No.A-1/9, Fruit Market, Kothapet, Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad. Rep by its Managing Partner, Mohd. Waheeduddin, S/o. Mohd. Misbhauddin, Aged about 36 years ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Agricultural Market Committee, Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad, Rep by its Chairman. 2 Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.BHARAT BABU Counsel for Respondent No.1:MR.V.V.N.NARAYANA RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner sought for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in seeking to demolish a structure comprising two rooms constructed by the petitioner in shop No.A-1/9 of Fruit Market, Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. At the hearing, Sri N.Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.1 is bent upon dismantling two rooms constructed by the petitioner for the convenience of the growers/sellers, even without issuing a notice and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1, on instructions, submitted that until a show cause notice is given to the petitioner and the explanation, if any to be submitted by it, is considered, no action for demolition will be taken. This statement of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record and the writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.14995 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th JUNE, 2009. Note: issue copy by tomorrow. B/o kvni