IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.320 of 2009 1. HEERA PRASAD VERMA @ HEERA VERMA SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA PD.VERMA 2. VINAY KUMAR SON OF LATE BASUDEO PRASAD BOTH RESIDENTS OF AINKHAN, P.S. DULHIN BAZAR, DISTT. PATNA ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.1058 of 2009 BINOD RAI @ BINOD KUMAR RAI SON OF MITHU RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR DUMARI, P.S. GORAUL, DISTT. VAISHALI ---------------------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- with Cr.Misc. No.2133 of 2009 RAM NATH SAH SON OF LATE RAMPHAL SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAUDAH CHATUR, P.S. PATEPUR, DISTT. VAISHALI --------------------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.2.2009 Heard. The three petitions arise out of Mahua P.S. case no. 224/2003. The case is registered under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and it is alleged that a metal idol of Budha was recovered from the possession of Pappu Khan while he was at the house of co-accused Sanjay Paswan. The defence is that said Sanjay Paswan has purchased it from the open market in Veranasi and during course of argument the receipt in 2 respect of purchase of the idol on 14.8.2003 much earlier to the recovery and institution of the case, has been produced. The next contention is that there is no theft report in respect of seized articles. Let the above named petitioners of three petitions be released from custody on furnishing bonds each of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur in Mahua P.S. case no. 224/2003. (Dharnidhar Jha,J.) AI