IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13095 of 2009 DHANUSHDHAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the President of the Managing Committee of the school and the allegation is against Headmaster for defalcation of the amount which was given in his custody for construction of school building etc. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that entire responsibility was on the Headmaster which is clear from the report of the District School Education Officer and the Headmaster was the custodian and drawing and disbursing officer of the said money and hence there was no responsibility at all on the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that there is no material at all against the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely Dhanushdhar Singh shall be released on bail on furnishing bail - 2 - bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No. 132 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Kanchan (S. N. Hussain, J.)