1 PIL131.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.131 OF 2011 KJ Mohammed Zafar J. Shaikh )..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Ghanshyamdas Upadhyay i/by Law Juris for the petitioner. Mr.P.G.Lad AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.V.D.Patil for respondent no.3. Mr.A.S.Patil for respondent nos.4 & 5. ---- CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ DATE : 24th November, 2011 PC 1 In our view, this PIL is not required to be entertained at the hands of the petitioner as he challenged the development scheme wherein his father is one of the member. Considering the averments made in the petition, we are not satisfied that this is a genuine PIL. If the petitioner has any personal grievance, he is 2 PIL131.11.sxw free to file appropriate proceedings as deem fit. It is argued by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the authority has acted upon some fraudulent documents. Since the petitioner’s father is vitally interested in connection with the subject matter, and if the petitioner or his father have any grievance in that behalf, the petitioner and his father are free to take out the appropriate proceedings. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is not pressing this PIL seriously. In view of the above, the PIL is disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J)