IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3371 of 2010 1. AMRITESH KUMAR UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS FATHER PANKAJ KANT CHOUDHARY R/O VILL.- RUPOULI, P.S.- MUSREGHARI, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCE DEPTT. NEW DELHI 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN, PATNA SAMBHAG, PATNA 3. THE PRINCIPAL KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, PATNA 4. THE REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ALLAHABAD 5. THE DIRECTOR CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EXAMINATION, NEW DELHI ----------- 2. 26.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the CBSE and the learned Counsel for the Kendriya Vidyalaya. Learned Counsel for the respondents submit that they have received instruction that the petitioner has less than 60 % of attendance and therefore is not eligible as per regulation 14(ii) to appear. Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this application and represent before the Chairman of the Board for necessary condonation in terms of the regulation, but which has to be considered strictly in accordance with law only. If the petitioner files such a representation expeditiously it is expected that the Chairman of the Board shall deal with the same expeditiously so that mere delay in consideration does not operate to the prejudice of the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)