rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 966 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 966 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 966 OF 2006 IN IN IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. OF 2006 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. OF 2006 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. OF 2006 (LODGING NO. 337 OF 2006) (LODGING NO. 337 OF 2006) (LODGING NO. 337 OF 2006) IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3038 OF 2003 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3038 OF 2003 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3038 OF 2003 Tata Motors Limited. ..Applicant/ (Org.Plaintiffs) V/s. M/s.Rahul Motors & Ors. ..Respondents (Org.Defendants) Mr. Ketan Parekh a/w.Mr.Vipul Bilve i/b.Mulla & Mulla for the Plaintiff. Ms.Kumud L.Das i/b.Mr.R.M.Vahoo for the Defendant Nos. 1 to 3. Ms.Kumud L. Das i/b.Mr.R.B.Choure for Defendant Nos. 5 to 7. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Mrs.Das, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the Respondents states that her instructing advocates have the authority to execute the consent terms which have been tendered by both the parties in Court which are taken on record and marked "X". 2. Mr.Ratnakar D. Choure undertakes to file his vakalatnama on behalf of Defendant Nos. 5,6 and 7 on or before 24th March, 2008. Four weeks time has been sought and is granted for filing his vakalatnaka : 2 : as it is stated that Defendant Nos.5,6 and 7 are not in Mumbai presently. Respondent No.3, it is stated, has authority to sign the consent term on behalf of Respondent No.7. The consent terms are accordingly singed by Respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 7 and their advocates. The consent terms are also signed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 by their advocates and counsel who states that they have authority from the Respondent Nos.5 and 6 to do so. The undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted. 3. The suit is disposed of in terms of the said consent terms. All the parties are stated that the consent terms are the same as those taken on record by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as recorded in the order of the Supreme Court dated 28th November, 2007 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 964 of 2006 to 967 of 2006. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. 4. The Associate is directed to issue forthwith to the parties xerox copies of the consent terms certified by her. *******