(1) WP. 6933.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6933 OF 2010 Sahebrao S/o Kisan Dhas .. Petitioner VERSUS Anna S/o Kisan Vyavahare .. Respondent Mr. S.D. Ghayal, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate h/f. Mr. K.R. Doke, Advocate for the respondent ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 3RD AUGUST, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard counsel. The petitioner challenges orders rendered by Additional Collector, Beed and the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad in the proceedings for mutation. The respondent’s application for mutation of his name in respect of the well situated in gat no. 92 came to be allowed by the Sub Divisional Officer though it was rejected by the Tahsildar. The Sub Divisional Officer held that the petitioner executed a document in the month of December, 2003. The petitioner disputed the said (2) WP. 6933.2010 document. It is stated by counsel for the parties that Civil Suit (R.C.S. 351 of 2009) is pending in respect of the right to draw water of the well in question. The question as to whether the petitioner executed the affidavit which was attested by the Competent Officer or that it is a fabricated document as alleged by him, is required to be decided by the Civil Court. This Court will not entertain such disputed question of fact. The three authorities have concurrently held against the petitioner regarding the objection raised by him in respect of the mutation entry. 2. Under the circumstances, the Petition is disposed of as no interference is called for. However, the mutation entry, if any, will be subject to the final outcome of the civil Suit between the parties and shall be treated as an adhoc entry till the suit is finally decided. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp