- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.612 OF 1990 NO.612 OF 1990 NO.612 OF 1990. India Photographic Co. Ltd. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Rita M. Gandhi & Anr. ..Defendants. .... None for the Plaintiff. Mr. S.Chopda, for the Defendant. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 21ST JANUARY 2009 : 21ST JANUARY 2009 : 21ST JANUARY 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This suit had appeared before this Court [Coram : R.M.Savant, J.] on 21st November 2008, when none appeared for the parties. However, the parties were directed to come with the draft issues on the next date. It was also recorded that if the plaintiffs fail to appear, then the suit would be dismissed for non-prosecution. The suit was adjourned for a period of 2 weeks. 2. The suit once again appeared before this Court [Coram : R.M.Savant, J.] on 5th December 2008, when none appeared for the parties. The suit was, therefore, directed to be placed "For Dismissal" after 2 weeks. The suit once again appeared before this Court [Coram : R.M. Savant, J.] on 19th December 2008 under the - 2 - caption "For Dismissal", when none appeared for the parties. The suit was therefore, adjourned beyond vacation. 3. Today, the suit has once again appeared under the caption "For Dismissal". However, the plaintiffs and their Advocates are absent. 4. In view thereof, it is clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]