A HIGH COURT OFCSIHAmSGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 62SO of2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 'a^ 3. Ku. Mnnni Chaadrakar, Age about 44 years;Astt. Teacher D/o Shri. Gopsil Prasad Chandrakar, Govt. School Safcra, Block- Patau Distt. - DurgfC.G.) Versus State Goyt. of Chha.ttisgarh, Through Secretaiy; Tritoal Welfare Department & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Distt-Ratpur (C.G.) ,;Disfrict Educalaon OfGcer, .' Burg, Dlsteict- Dui^(C.G.) BlbGls Educatioii Officer, Patan, Districf- Dui^ (C.G.) WRITPBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CQNSTITOTION QF1HDIA Appearaace: Shn Somteant.Verma, eounsel fi)r tbe petitiQner. ShnAjay Dwisedi, Panel Lawyer ibr fhe State ori; advance copy.; : . , , , •• ORALORDER (15.10.2007) SfXNILKUMAR SINHA, J Heard.1 ' ' : • .. ; ' ' • - • Learaed counsel for the petitioher submits that the issue involved ia fhe case is as to whefher the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of initial appointment pr from the date ofcompletiQn ofprohation period. He ^ubmits that fhe issue iuvolved hereia was cQnsidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Ailmmistratiye Tribunal, •Jabatpur in O.A, No.2745789 (Madhukaat Yadu aud 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and ofhers), wUereiu, it was held that ttie smularly situa.ted teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appouitment. Tfie luatter was taken up to fhe Hon'ble Supreme Courtia SpecialLeave Petition(GiyiQ No.6892/93. Theisaid petitionwas disnussed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court-upholding B KP. (8)No.6250/2fM)7 v vatti the decision of the Tribunal to the eflect fhat fhe Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale irom. the da.teofiaitial appbiutment. Leamed couiisel for the petitioner furfher submits that fhis Court, while cousidering the sauie issue in Ram Kuniar Sahu aad others Vs. State Gtovt. ofChhattisgarhaad another (W.P.(S) No.813 of2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date ofinitial appointment. Leamed cQuusel for the parties joinfly submits fhat fhis case is squarely eovered by the decision ofthis Coartin fhe case of Rain Kuinar Sahu aad anoftier (supra). In viewofthat, this petition is allowed in. fhe same tenns. However, this order shaU. be subject to all verifications made by fhe State regardiag facts pleaded ia fhe petition. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ?