IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29495 of 2011 Manish Poddar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 2. 07.09.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in a complaint case under Section 498A IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for a period of six months. Thereafter he was required to appear physically and surrender before the court below and seek regular bail which was to be decided on its own merits in light of the subsequent developments and attitude of the parties to be assessed by the trial court. The application dated 12.7.2010 filed by him before the court below and sought to be presently relied upon is described as “Humble petition for regular bail/confirmation of the provisional bail”. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that it appears that the petitioner was not properly advised with regard to the manner in which he was required to proceed. In view of that submission it is observed that if the petitioner surrenders forth with before the Court of SDJM, Khagaria in Complaint Case No. 991 C of 2008 and prays for regular bail in the manner directed on 21.12.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 42631 of 2009 his application is required to be considered in accordance with the directions contained in the earlier order. This application is dismissed with the aforesaid observations. Let this order be communicated by fax at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)