1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1073 OF 2006 Umesh Sitaram Yadav .. Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Sachin V.Masurkar for the petitioner. Mr.S.V.More A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2006 DATED : 31ST JULY, 2006 DATED : 31ST JULY, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Mr.More, learned A.P.P. on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the court submits that the concerned authority did not intend to take interim bond from the petitioner. In view thereof Mr.Masurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall contest the show cause notice by filing his reply. He may do so within a period of two weeks from today, failing which, the concerned authority shall have liberty to pass the orders on merits in accordance with law. With these observations the petition is disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)