HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W.A. Nos.72, 82, 81 and 83 of 2008 Date: 7-2-2008 Between: P.V. Venkata Rao and others. …. Appellants. (Appellants in all the WAs) and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District and others. … Respondents. (Respondents in all the WAs) :COMMON JUDGMENT: Per Gopala Krishna Tamada, J All these appeals arising out of interim orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.25450 of 2007 and 24827 of 2007 dated 29.11.2007 can be disposed of together as the challenge in both the writ petitions is to the order passed by the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District dated 7.8.2007 setting aside the order of the Inam Tribunal and Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella granting occupancy rights in favour of the petitioners. By the orders impugned in these appeals, the learned Single Judge while granting an order of status quo directing the respondents to maintain status quo with regard to the entries in the revenue records obtaining as on the date of passing of the order, however, made an observation that the order will not preclude any party to approach the Civil Court as directed by the appellate authority to resolve the controversy with regard to the succession and entitlement of the occupancy rights. The grievance of the appellants in these appeals is that if the respondents approach the Civil Court and file a civil suit as per the observation made in the orders impugned, there is the possibility of the trial Court being influenced by the said observation. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, we are of the view that the observation made by the learned Single Judge cannot be a ground for the appellants to approach this Court in these appeals. In fact, the appellants should have moved an application before the learned single Judge seeking clarification of the order taking all the grounds, which have been now taken in the present appeals. We, therefore, see no merit in the appeals, which are accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. It is open to the appellants to file an appropriate application seeking clarification of the orders. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 7th February, 2008 GOPALA KRISHNA TADAMA,J vtv