1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.378/2009 Kundlik Shivram Vaidya ...Versus... Abhiman Shivram Vaidya ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri A.M. Gadam, Adv. for applicant] [Ms R.V. Kalia, Adv. for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 02.07.2009 Second appeal stood dismissed for non-removal of office objections. Heard. Learned Counsel for respondent submits that this is third time now this Court is required to consider such type of application. Having heard learned Counsel for the rival parties, I am inclined to condone the delay, but subject to payment of costs. Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of its prayer clause – (i) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,500/- (Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred Only) to the Counsel for respondent. 2 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.1153/2009 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Second Appeal is restored to file. List the appeal for admission on 16.07.2009. Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw