IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.471 of 2007 MALLICK @ ZEYAUL RAHMAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. The direction of this Court in the writ was to consider the representation of the petitioner and if any amount was found due on such consideration the same should be paid. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.3, Director, Health Services, Government of Bihar, it is stated that the representation of the petitioner was rejected by a reasoned order dated 25.9.2007 (Annexure A). In the above circumstance, no case for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties is made out. This contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. It is needless to say that the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the order passed by the authority in accordance with law. shahid (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)