IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 23RD MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 32985 of 2006(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- NIKKU MOHAN K., KOLAZHI HOUSE, P.O. VADOOKARA, S.N. NAGAR, THRISSUR-680007. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MANOMOHANAN, SRI.N.A.GANAPATI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE PRINCIPAL, ST. MARY'S COLLEGE, THRISSUR-680020. 2. THE MANAGER, ST.MARY'S COLLEGE, THRISSUR-680020. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNAMTHANAM (SR.), SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T. MUHAMMED. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/02/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.32985/2006: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE FEE RECEIPT DTD. 08/08/2006. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER CERTIFICATE DTD. 03/12/2006. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD. 04/12/2006. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: ANNEXURE.I: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD. 27/11/2002 OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION (B) DEPARTMENT. //TRUE COPY// prv. K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.32985 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT Case of the petitioner is as follows: Petitioner is a first year B.Sc. Microbiology student studying in the second respondent's college. When she got an offer of a seat in an Engineering College, she decided to join. She approached the second respondent for TC and marklist and they refused to issue it. It is stated that the first respondent has to issue the TC and return the marklist of the Plus Two Examinations. Petitioner also demands return of the amount collected as Course and Establishment fees. 2. Today, when the matter came up, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that if the petitioner files a fresh representation for grant of TC and return of the documents and the money paid as fees, the second respondent will consider the matter sympathetically within three weeks. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of recording the submission of respondents 1 and 2 and there will be a direction that if the petitioner files a representation as aforesaid, the second respondent WPC. 32985/2006. 2 will consider the matter and take appropriate decision sympathetically within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.