IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 2110 of 2010(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.P.ANILKUMAR, HEAD CONSTABLE-3320 (UNDER SUSPENSION), KAINADI POLICE STATION, NILAMPEROOR.P.O, ALAPUZHA, RESIDING AT CHAKKALAYAIL (H), KUMBALANGI SOUTH P.O, KOCHI-7. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, ALAPUZHA. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SRI. ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 2110 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Head Constable in the Police Department. He was suspended from service on 5.3.2005 on the ground that in connection with Crime No. 55/05 he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. This Writ Petition has been filed mainly for a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to finalise the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner by considering Ext.P4 and also to direct the respondents to re-instate him in service. 2. A statement has been filed on behalf of the first respondent in this Writ Petition. It is stated therein that as against the petitioner also CC No.610/2005, on the file of the Judicial I class Magistrate Court, Chertala originated from Crime No. 55/05 was compounded. But the judgment in the said case is yet to be received by the department. It is further stated therein that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner is still pending. In Paragraph 5 of the statement it is stated thus:- “The final disposal of the disciplinary proceedings WPC.2110 of 2010 : 2 : can be done only after getting the judgment from the Court. Now there is no objection to reinstate him into service if the petitioner makes a request for the same” 3. The above statement in paragraph 5 of the statement is recorded. Along with I.A.3475/2010 filed in this Writ Petition, the petitioner has produced a representation dated 22.2.2010 carrying a request for reinstate into service, as per Ext.P5. In the light of the aforesaid statement recorded, the first respondent shall consider Ext.P5 representation submitted by the petitioner for the purpose of getting reinstatement into service. Orders thereon shall be passed expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner has yet another grievance that for the past 4 months he has not been given the subsistence allowances. While considering Ext.P5, the first respondent shall also look into the said grievance of the petitioner and appropriate orders shall also be passed in the said matter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge