1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1061 OF 2010 1 Baliram s/o Dhondiba Pawar, age 37 years, occ. Labour, 2 Mahadeo s/o Dhondiba Pawar, age 34 years, occ. Labour, 3 Dattatraya s/o Dhondiba Pawar, age 30 years, occ. Labour, 4 Jagannath s/o Dhondiba Pawar, age 42 years, occ. Agril., All r/o Kamkheda, Tq. Renaput, District Latur. ...Applicants/ appellants(orig.accused) VERSUS 1 The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ..... Shri N.D.Kendre, advocate for applicants/appellants Smt. B.R.Khekale, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 23 rd July, 2010 2 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri N.D.Kendre, advocate for applicants/appellants and Smt. B.R.Khekale, A.P.P. for respondent. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicants/appellant (original accused) seeking their enlargement on bail pending hearing and final disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 2010 suspending substantive sentences inflicted upon them till then, since the applicants/appellants have challenged the conviction and sentences rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Latur in Special Case (Atrocity) No. 17 of 1997 on 27.1.2010, convicting the applicants/appellants nos. 1 to 4 under Section 324 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them to suffer S.I. for three months each and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to suffer S.I. for 15 days. 3 The applicants/appellants contend that they were on bail during the pendency of the trial and they have not misused the said liberty. Learned counsel for the applicants also submitted that the applicants have deposited fine amount imposed upon them. Learned counsel for the applicants also pointed out that the learned Trial Court suspended the substantive sentences imposed upon the applicants/appellants on 27.1.2010 and enlarged applicants/appellants nos. 1 to 4 on bail in the 3 sum of Rs.15,000/- each and on furnishing surety in the like amount by each of them. This Court also continued the said substantive sentences of the applicants/appellants till R. and Ps. is received and till present application for bail is heard and decided. Hence, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that same bail granted to the applicants/appellants be continued on the same terms and conditions till the disposal of the appeal. 4 In the light of the afore said facts, bail granted to the applicants/appellants nos. 1 to 4 by the learned Trial Court suspending the substantive sentences inflicted upon the applicants and continued by this court be continued till the final hearing and disposal of present Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 2010 suspending the substantive sentences of the applicants till then, but on furnishing fresh bonds by each of them, on the condition that the applicants shall report before the Incharge of Renapur Police Station, Taluka Renapur, District Latur, in connection with C.R. No. 61 of 1997, once in a quarter till the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 2010, and present application stands disposed of accordingly. R. and Ps. be sent back to the concerned court. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap1061.10 4