IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.508 of 2011 Date of Decision: April 05, 2011 Nirmal Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner (Cooperation), Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. B.S. Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Vide Order dated 4.9.2008 (Annexure P-4) passed by Deputy Commissioner –cum- District Collector, Jalandhar, petitioner has been removed from the post of Lambardar on the ground that petitioner, acting as Lambardar, issued receipt on the plea that enhanced chaukidara is to be paid by the residents, and mis-used his office. 2. Petitioner filed an appeal that has been dismissed vide Order dated 10.11.2008 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Commissioner, CWP No.508 of 2011 [2] Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar. Order, Annexure P-5 was challenged before the Financial Commissioner in revisional jurisdiction, that has been dismissed vide Order dated 28.5.2010 (Annexure P-7). 3. Order Annexure P-4 is based on an enquiry report. On the asking of the Court, enquiry report has been placed on record as Annexure P-10. Naib Tehsildar conducted an enquiry in regard to allegations of misconduct of the petitioner and found on the basis of documentary evidence that the petitioner had been over-charging the residents of the estate in context of chaukidara and chulha tax. 4. Learned counsel, in the face of such findings, has not been able to justify challenge to the impugned orders. 5. No ground for interference in extraordinary writ jurisdiction is called for. 6. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 05, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?