-1- IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.(S)No. '7^?'^ / 2011 PETITIONER ^ ^.^ ^;5i^^:; ^"^} <-1^, Smt Sunita Verma (Before Marriage Sunita Paragniha ) aged 44 years, w/o B.L Verraa Head Master Middle School, Govt. Higher Secondry School Tifra District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITON 2. District Education Officer Bilaspur (C.G) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :- .,; EQ] '?^1 -f»fS^ yS?U. ££^^.^5fS%.A/JLytfAiMSf ?.P_.IS1.MQ, 7673/aOl1 S'!-inita Venaa versus State ofC.G. & Others Shri Soialcant Verma. counsel &r the petitioaer. Shri A.V.SIuidhar, P.L. for the State; 115.12.20111 Counsel for the petitioner sutoiaits fhat fhe petitioner is entiued to benefit of tn'o advance increiBCiits on account of siie having passed B.Ed. examuiation before her appoiatment at hcr owa cost. It is submitted that the issue iuvolved in fb.e present petition is 0.0 longer res integra aad fhe same has been finally decided by the Hoii'ble Supreme Court m. ftie case ofAsha Saxeaa Vs. State ofM.P. & Ors. It is furfher subinitted tbat fhis Court has also taken a similar view in its orier dated. 6.2.2009 passed m W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for fbe petitioners furfher submits tliat the order dated 29.4.2010 passed ia Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, wliereio relnag upoa tlie judgiaeiit ofthe Suprexae Court ia the case ofAsha Saxeaa (supra) aiid fhe ord.er passed by tliis Court in ajiother Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions. have beea issued for consideration of the case for grars.t of tavo advaace increinents as per c.ircular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya pradesh, after veriiication of the facts pleaded in the petition. Couasel for the State subinits that case of the petitioiier would also be considened on th.e sam.e lines. ^ "^^ 'Ss, S&t, S ""^ t ':%^y "-^SSSSS^' In view of above, tlie peTition is disposed of with a direction to fhe respondent authorities to decide Ttie claiiu of the petitioner for ;rant of two advance ilicreiaents as per ("ircular dated 21.9.1974 issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh after veriiication of tb.e facts pleaded iu the petition wifhia a period offour inonths frosi today. It is raade clear fhat this Court has not expressed any opinion on. laerits of the case aiid the aufhorih'- concemed would be at Ubert\- to decide th.e same stncUv in accordarice with law. Prkiiiker Diwaker - .Judge