THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.11609 of 2006 Dated: 19.06.2006 Between: Khurseed Ahmed (E.No.99103), S/o Shaik Mahaboob, Worked as Driver, APSRTC, Faluknuma Depot, Hyderabad. .... PETITIONER AND The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, rep. by its Regional Manager, Picket, Secunderabad and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.11609 of 2006 Order: Questioning the action of the respondents in not releasing the revised additional monetary benefit to the petitioner in terms of Circular No.PD-40/2005, dated 26.08.2005, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The petitioner was appointed as a Driver in the respondents-Corporation in the year 1982 and he served as such for more than two decades. While so, during the medical examination, the petitioner was declared as unfit to hold the post of driver, due to his defective vision, and accordingly, he was retired from service with effect from 09.02.2004. Subsequently, the petitioner made a representation dated 30.09.2005 requesting the respondents-Corporation to pay the revised additional monetary benefit in lieu of alternative employment, in pursuance of the Circular No.PD-40/2005, dated 26.08.2005, but, no action has been taken by the respondents-Corporation so far. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-Corporation. Both the counsel agreed to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner. Since the representation dated 30.09.2005 of the petitioner is said to be pending consideration before respondent No.2 and in view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 30.09.2005 of the petitioner in the light of the Circular, dated 26.08.2005, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 19.06.2006 Nsr/Ksr