IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14684 of 2011 Vishunu Mahto @ Vishnu Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner is being husband of the deceased and is in jail custody since 03.09.2010 in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the I.P.C. Admittedly, the marriage of deceased had taken place with petitioner seven years ago before lodging the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that except the informant and his other family members none has supported the prosecution case. Moreover, when informant and his other family members were examined before Trial Court, they have not supported the prosecution case and in post-mortem report, no external or internal injury was found on the person of the deceased. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Vishunu Mahto @ Vishnu Mahto be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahampura P.S. Case No. 58/2010. Kamlesh (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)