IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2009 / 15TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18761 of 2009(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SOUMYA SUNNY, D/O.SUNNY P.V., AGED 25 YEARS, THULUVATH HOUSE, R.S.ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CLT UTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).18761/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 6th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner has completed her B.Tech Course in Electrical and Electronics in the year 2007 from the N.S.S College of Engineering, Palakkad. Apparently dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper, Industrial Psychology, in the 7th semester supplementary examination, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 7th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination. Application for revaluation is pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the W.P.(C).18761/09 2 revaluation sought for by the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. sd/- V.GIRI, Judge mrcs //true copy// P.A. to Judge.