IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2008 / 2ND POUSHA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 5024 of 2008() --------------------------------- CRIME NO. 168/2007 IF E.T. NORTH POLICE STATION PASSED BY THE JFCM-I PETITIONER/ 5TH ACCUSED ----------------------------------------- KAMALUDEEN.K.N, S/O. HASSAINAR, KEERIYAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, PAVARATTY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAIJU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION OF CB CID SIGII, CR. 82/CR/8-11-07 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J --------------------------- CRL.M.C. 5024 OF 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2008 O R D E R Public Prosecutor takes notice for respondent. Heard both sides. 2. Challenge is to the condition imposed on the petitioner while granting bail in Crime No. 168/2007 of Ernakulam Town North Police Station by the Judicial First Class Magistrate -1, Ernakulam as modified by the learned Sessions Judge in Crl.M.C 1988/08. As per that order, the petitioner was granted 45 days time from the date of his release to produce the solvency certificate. Petitioner is still aggrieved and hence this petition. Learned counsel contends that the conditions imposed even as modified by the learned Sessions Judge is harsh in that, petitioner is not able to comply with that. 2. Petitioner is accused of offences punishable under Section 489 (A), (B) and (C) r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is not disputed by the learned counsel that petitioner is involved in another case also involving economic offence. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor and going Crl.M.C.No. 5024/2008 -2- through the order under challenge and considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to think that the condition as modified by the learned Sessions Judge is in any way illegal or harsh requiring interference by this court. 3. However, considering the time required for obtaining the solvency certificate, I am persuade to extend the time granted by the learned Sessions Judge by another 45 days from today. Resultantly, this petition is disposed of granting 45 (forty five) days time to the petitioner from today to produce the solvency certificate as directed by the learned Sessions Judge in the impugned order. Crl.M.C is disposed of accordingly. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vkm