IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1920 of 2010 Smt. Urmila Sinha Versus State of Bihar ************** 4. 02.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to G.A.-2 for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though payments of G.P.F. have been made but the statutory interest on the same not paid and as such it is submitted that the authorities have committed contempt of this Court. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that all the payments were made even before passing of order in the connected writ application without statutory interest. Since all the payment of the provident fund dues have been made but after some delay, the authority ought to have paid the interest as well. However, considering the submission of the parties, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter, however, in case statutory interest is not paid over the G.P.F. amount as alleged, the same shall be verified and it statutory interest is not paid, the same may be paid. Saif/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)