IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10168 of 2010 NAGE MANAL, SON OF KESHO MANDAL, RESIDENT OF BAIRIA BIND TOLA, P.S. NATHNAGAR, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. With Cr.Misc. No.4756 of 2010 BANGTA MANDAL @ KAILASH MANDAL, SON OF LATE GAURAV MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARIYA, P.S. NATHNAGAR, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Shiwesh Chandra Mishra (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 02/ 30.06.2010 Since both the above bail applications have arisen out of one occurrence registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are attributed the role of firing which has proved fatal to the informant’s younger brother. Grievance of the petitioners is that despite commitment long back, the trial of Bangta Mandal has not concluded and only two witnesses have been examined whereas on behalf of Nage Mandal it has been submitted that his case has not been committed as yet. The petitioner Nage Mandal is in custody since 21.11.2008 whereas petitioner Bangta Mandal is 2 in custody since 28.05.2008. Considering every aspects of the matter, prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected. There is no change in the circumstances and the trial has begun. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)