1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4291 OF 2010 Mohd. Sadik Sk. Iamail Vs. Mijaj Bee Razaq Baigh And Others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Shri R. J. Shinde Adv for petitioner. CORAM: .B. P. DHARMADHIKARI J. Dated: 21 st SEPTEMBER, 2010. Petitioner is plaintiff whose application for temporary injunction at Ex. 5 was rejected. When suit was proceeding further and was for final adjudication (evidence) he filed another application. It appears that his application at Ex. 62 was for protecting his peaceful possession and Ex. 85 was for restraining defendants from interfering with the possession. By common order passed on 15th January 2009 trial Court has allowed those applications. This order was challenged by respondents by filing M. C. A. No. 2 of 2009 and on 5th July 2009 that M.C. A. has been allowed. 2 It is apparent that when application at Ex. 5 was rejected and that order attained finality other applications for same purpose could not have been entertained or allowed. Though order dated 15th January 2009 is annexed with writ petition the learned counsel is not in a position to show to this Court the order passed below Ex. 5 and I am therefore not inclined to interfere with the matter Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE svk 3 4 5