t E'. c* .^.k^ (D IN IHE HIGH CCUBI_^LJSD^^®E•iff B.ILASPD& iC.G.J NR.O' PECS'IQN N0.. f /' yaoo A ^f:. PBTJ'TIONER ^•-•.^•^\p^ ^^" t^°'... "" .L" ^^^ ^.'y^6^-'. ^. '^%^ ^^$^ ^\<^ RESpa'BENTS YT VESSUS 1) Devraj Singn Paritosr S/o shri Sssha Singh Psrihar ^v Aged ^5 years, Head Constable Mo. 84 P.S. Kirandul, Distt. Daotev.ada (C.G.) 2) Prakash Pawar, S/0 Shri Aaand Rao Ji Pawar Aged 32' years, CoDstable No. 992 P.£. Bfaangi, Oistfc. Daotewada (C.G.) 3) Devnath Yadav, S/0 Late £ubedraYadav, Aged about §3 years, R/0 Village & Post Nagaraer P.S. Nagarnar,Dxstt. Bastar (C.G.) A) Bajrangi Prassd ( &.P.C.) S/0 &hri LokaatQ •^- Aged about t^f. years Vfch Batali&o. S.A.F. Jagdalpur, ~S Compaay. 1) Union of Ir.iia, Tnrougb s Secrefcacy Public Grivences £c Persooal Affair Govt;. of laaia • * • IxFdt •• 2) State of Cfabafcfcisgerh 'Snro'ugh s Secretary Kune ( Police ) Departmeat Saipur (C.G.) 3} Stafce of Ma3bya Pralesh Ibrough s Secretary Home ( Pola.ee ) Qepsrtmeot: Vallnbfa Bka.wa.n, Bhopal (M.P.) 4) Disfcra.c't: SuperiiSenaent of Police, Daatewada. 5) Dicec'bor Geaeral of Police Police Head Quar-fcer, Raipur (C.G.) WB.SE B'ESSsias vsosa. ssssiLE 226/227 as 'SHE coHSTiEmii^_^_^£^ E^,;WW^..iatwi»— XI-HC-22 -ys^ •^nqRPT, ^rftWIS, ('KII'M^ 111CTI Sbllcb sw^f iRra; W./?-/Vo. 162S/ 200 •^' (ci<><y aii^r^r VW* 3D^T sh'ilfi 311^1 ^gTWtrt?^ 09.07.2004 On a mention beiag inade, fU Sbri Y.C.Shanaa, counsel foj Shri S.K. Beriwal, Senioif India/respondent no. 1 on advance[ Shri V.V.S. Murfhy, Depu^ Akhil Agrawal, Panel Laroyer for th4 I.A. No.3877/2004 for ui^enj aUocatioxi of petitioners. He furthe i.c., W.P.No.578/2004 (Balendra $ Union of India and others) orders on 17.12.2003. He also prodw 18.6.2004 passed in W.P. 1560/2p04 (Jitendra Siagh Tomar and others -vs- Union of India and oth< similar order niav be passed in this Leamed counsel for the resi on the statenient of counsel for similar orders inav be passed. Having considered the facts j inaterial on record and considering qiFlfep'ft'T'RTCRJf 4 fsTZt'(f»R?IT ^aipgiian^l matter is taken up. the petitioaers. Pancl Lawver for Union of copv. v Advocate Gencral with Shri Stete. hearine is allowed. Heard. Counsel for the petitioners s^ibmits that fhe inatter relates to |r subinits that in sifflilar inatter thekhar Mishra and otbers -vs- |iave been passed by this Court ;d a copy of the order dated rs). Leamed counsel prays that case also. londents submitted fhat relvins t|he petitioner tnade at the Bar, &nd circumstanccs of tbe case, the stateinent inade bv counsel fpr the petitioner at fhe Bar and ^n view of fhe judgment/orders j cited above and further the legal T(osition, the action of tbe State Authorities ia not reUeviag thc peti^ioners caxinot be sustafaied aud [TN!W34 to XI-HC-22 311^1 ^iT R-ijcb sn^i 5n*ii<=t) yfia Rao'/ -ysf ^i)|t||<>|q, ynl^'is, [sictl'yy sn^yr 'q^ra? 111CTI g,^jq,------------"g^ 200 1q^y' ^ the petitioners are entitled for directed to reUeve the petitioncrs production of a copy of fhis order^ Accordingly, this petition st^nds disposed of. ConsequenUy, M.W.P.1447^ C.C. as per rules. 4i'iili'i'jfl'i ^WvS 4 ivS <F=i^i< ^aipgiisn^T relievinR. The resuondents are withiQ 15 davs ifrom the date of 2004 also stauds^disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge 3S!°< y^. '..-•' I-