1 vss. %-.'y ^ Wfai.e.^y^ lu'i-i»:to{1 .'^c.^F' \^yv^— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION fS) N0. ^2-^) OF 200^-( PETITIONER ..•••'~T^'" ...• ,,^^"" ^»-' "^ [C' Bhanupratap Sidar Son of Shri Basudev Sidar, aged about 36 years, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Amlachaka, Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). ^® ss-.!>•-' RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^£$ ''•lS:'^toH.*"?';''"' ••"' •s- /I State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. K HI6H COURTOF W^AmSGAWAT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH ; HON'BLE MR. SATISH X A6NIHOTRI.J. WRTT PETTTION fa) N0. 507 OF 2007 Petitjoner Reaiondents versus Premlal Chauhan State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRIT pErmoN (si NO. 510 OF 2007 Petitioner Restwnclents Dttchand Chautian versus State of Chhatt'isgarh and o+hers WRTTPETmON fa^ N0 519 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Surendra |(umar Bishat State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRrrpFTmoNfayNo. szioFZtmz Petitioner Respondents versus Rambl Sohu State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PFTTnON fsl N0. 522 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaondents versus Topsingh Patel State of Chhattisgarh and others AtLd WRIT PETTHON fa) N0. 823jCTE_20Q7 Petitioner yersys Resoondents Bhcnupratap Sidar 5tate of Chhatt-isgarh and others Present : Mr. P.P. Sahu;counsel for thepetitior»rs. Mr. SatiA Supta, t?y. &oyt. AdVocate for •the State/ respondents. r OftDER (Passed on this 25th day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/re|spondents jointly submit that the facts cmd questionof taw involvedin the present writ petitions aresquarely covered by the decteion of this Court in the cose of yashwantKwnar Bharadwij vs. Mwrieipal Cwporation. Owy and ow/Aw^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons,these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in -the matter of >/asA>»an^^marfl^aro</(Wiy(Supra),aibjecttoverificationof the fact as to whe'ther the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at -their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 cnd fur'ther whether they have been 1 : : : ' ' . pajd two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copyof this order be ploffied on record in connected writ petitions. ——— L. -'•• Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri ^Judge 1 2006Cri) JR-C696