IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29884 of 2011 1. Mukesh Yadav 2. Bali Yadav 3. Dhanesh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03 05.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner no. 1 is brother-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is husband of the deceased. Allegedly, petitioners committed dowry death of deceased on account of non-fulfilment of dowry demand. It would appear from perusal of first information report itself, that the marriage of deceased had taken place with petitioner no. 3 four years ago and after marriage deceased had delivered one female child. Although, dead body of the deceased has been disposed of by the petitioners in a very haste manner but submission on behalf of the petitioners is that petitioner no. 3 was working at Delhi at the relevant time and he along with deceased had come to his home on the occasion of marriage of his sister and had helped his father financially which caused annoyance to deceased resulting some altercation between petitioner no. 3 and deceased and later on, deceased committed suicide by jumping into well. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner nos. 1 and 2, namely, Mukesh Yadav and Bali Yadav are directed to be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 45 of 2011. So far as prayer of petitioner no. 3, namely, Dhanesh Yadav is concerned, the same is, hereby, rejected at least at this stage. It appears from perusal of prayer portion of this petition that the case of petitioners is still pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya. In the aforesaid circumstance, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya is directed to commit the case of the petitioners to the court of Sessions in accordance with law within a month from the date of receipt of this order and after commitment, the learned trial court shall try to conclude the trial of the petitioners within nine months from the date of commitment of the case and if the trial of the petitioners is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner no. 3 may renew his prayer for bail. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)