1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4122 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6269 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ...APPLICANT. VERSUS Chandrabhan s/o Kisan Lad ...RESPONDENT. ... Mr.V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for Applicants. ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4123 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6300 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4124 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.6303 OF 2009 CORAM: K.U. CHANDWAL, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned A.G.P. The State seeks to condone the delay of 804 days in causing to file the respective Appeals against the award in L.A.R. NOs. 2 11/2003, 10/2003 and 14/2003 respectively by Judgment dated 14/7/2006, recorded by the Second Adhoc Additional District Judge, Beed. 2. The record demonstrate, inspite of the Judgment dated 14/7/2006, the application for certified copy was not made in time. After receipt of the certified copy again time was consumed. The proposal, according to the learned A.G.P. was sent to the office of the Government Pleader and Mantralaya and there is delay. These grounds will not be fitting in the bracket of sufficient grounds to invoke the discretion in favour of the State. 3. Even otherwise on merits also I find that the learned Reference Court did not travel beyond the document and the evidence adduced. The sale instances are properly appreciated. There is no merit in the Applications. The respective Applications and the First Appeals are dismissed. Necessary Court Fee be refunded. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] asb/DEC09/ca4122.09