IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2007 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 163 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22953/2006 Dated 30/10/2006 .................... PETITIONER: ------------------ M.B.MOHAMMED, S/O. BAVA, AGED 50 YEARS, MANAKKATTU HOUSE, KOCHI UNIVERSITY ROAD, POST - KOCHI UNIVERSITY, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.VALSALAN SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 4,5,6,7: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUDHAKARAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY, KALAMASSERI MUNICIPALITY, P.O.KALAMASSERY. 2. SALIM, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY. 3. JIJO JOSEPH, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY. 4. SAM.C.GEORGE, S/O. GEORGE ABRAHAM, AGE NOT KNOWN, CHAKKALAYIL, UNIVERSITY P.O., KALAMASSERY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.RAVI KRISHNAN ADV. SMT.THUSHARA JAMES SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN,J ============== CONT. CASE.NO.163 OF 2007 ================== Dated this the 13th day of March, 2007 JUDGMENT Respondents 1 to 3 have filed an affidavit stating that all actions under law are being taken to implement my judgment. They also undertake that further steps also would be continued to be taken to see that the directions in my judgment are strictly implemented. This is recorded and the contempt case is closed. If the fourth respondent still continues with the nuisance, it would be open to the petitioner to approach respondents 1 to 3 and if no action is taken, it would be open to him to file a petition to revive this contempt case. The contempt case is closed with the above directions. S.SIRI JAGAN,JUDGE dvs