mcH W CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) Np.J749j Akhilesh Kumar Pandey S/o. Sari Munindra Pandey Aged about - 31 years R/o. Village-Atrauli, TahsU Hujur, Distt. - Rewa, (M.P.) VERSUS : 1. Chairman, Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B) 2. Director (P. & IR.), Coal India Ltd., 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) 3. Member Secretary, IBCC - VI (Joint Bipartite Committee for The Coal Industry), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkate (W.B.) 4, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qrt. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5, Chief General Manager, Hasdeo Area, Shahdol Distt. - Shahdol, (M.P.) WRTT PETITION UNTQER ARTICUE 226 OF THE CONSTn'UTION OF INDIA, Smgle^Bench: Hon'bIeJjisticeShnSatishK.Agnihotri Amit Present: Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for tfae respondents 4 and 5. QRDER (Passed on 7ulday ofMay, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tbe petitioners are similarly sifuated to that of the respondents io the matter of Chairman, Central Coalfields Ltd. & Other Vs. Jivendra Prasad Tiwari & Others (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of2007), Leamed counsel further submits that the said Civi! Appeal has been dispossd of vide order dated 29 March, 2007 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Leamed counsel farther subniits Ifaat tfais case may also be disposed ofin the same terms, to which the leamed counsel appearing for the respondent HO. 4 and 5 does not controvert. 2. In view ofthe above, the petition stands disposed of in tfae same terms. No order as to costs, Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge