9‘26 ”my..m.z....;..a.ag%/2%o mm (Wu) WWW WWW mmm WWWII'wm $afawan€¥r B: Hon’ble Shri Manindr 24.6.2010 Mr. B.P. Rao, counsel f ‘ the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, anel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. This petition is preferr d against the order dated 28.5.2010 (Annexure‘P-l) by which th petitioner has been transferred from HigherVSchool, Ghatula to Mid 1e School- Ujravan. Learned counsel for the etitioner submits that he has preferred a representation against the o er of transfer on 3.6.2010 (Annexure P- 2) In the opinion of this C urt, at this stage, there is no reason to interfere with the order of t ansfer as the petitioner has preferred representation on 3.6.2010. owever, it would be in the interest of justice to direct respondent 0.2, to consider and pass appropriate order on petitioner’s represent tion. With the aforesaid obse ations, the petition is finally disposed off. wee Sd/- “\x an ShrivastaY/a,‘ Praveen t Manindra MOh Judge ;MW.W A S a han Shrivastava J.