1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.7 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2631 OF 2005 Gazebo Restaurant & Department Stores Pvt Ltd & Anr. .. Petitioners versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents And Anil Khoje & Ors. .. Contemnors Mr.P.J.Thorat for the petitioners. Mr.R.S.Apte, Sr. Counsel a/w Mr.S.S.Pakale a/w Ms.T.H.Puranik for respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26th November 2009. P.C: . Shri Thorat appearing for the petitioners state that he has no instructions to appear as the petitioners have taken away the papers from him. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that one of the petitioners will appear in person and therefore, the petition may be kept back. 2. However, the said request cannot be acceded to as it is pointed out that the main writ petition has been disposed of. 2 3. Earlier order dated 13th August 2007 records that contempt petition cannot be taken up for hearing unless an order is passed with regard to admission of the main Writ Petition No.2631 of 2005. 4. The learned senior counsel appearing for the 1st respondent has invited my attention to order dated 16th July 2008 passed by Division Bench of this Court. By the said order, the main writ petition has been disposed of after recording a statement of the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent-Municipal Corporation. 5. The breach alleged in this contempt petition is of ad-interim/interim orders passed during the pendency of the writ petition. Considering the nature of order dated 16th July 2008, no case is made out for initiating proceedings against the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (A.S.OKA,J)