IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6843 of 2006 MANIK CHANDRA RAM SON OF LATE SHIVURAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAHADURPUR, P.S. BARIARPUR MUFASSIL, MUNGER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PURNEA 3. THE COMMANDANT BIHAR MILITARY POLICE-7, KATIHAR 4. SUKHDEO PRASAD SINGH INSPECTOR(S) B.M.P. 7, KATIHAR CONDUCTING OFFICER. ----------- 2 15/11/2010 The Court is not inclined to entertain any submission on any aspect of the matter on the question of dismissal of the petitioner from service for the simple reason that the petitioner has been convicted for serious offence of having murdered his wife by pouring Kerosene Oil and setting her on flame. Petitioner is yet to be exonerated by the appellate court of competent jurisdiction. In view of the fact that the petitioner has been convicted, even Article 311 of the Constitution of India makes an exception from holding any kind of enquiry in such a background. If the petitioner stands exonerated by the appellate court, all the submissions which he is trying to make now may be considered. The so called - 2 - infirmity being urged against the order contained in annexure-7 in light of what has been recorded in the earlier part of the order, does not merit consideration. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)