- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION (St) NO.6716/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3444/2008 Sundar Madanrao Chavan. ...Applicant.. (Org.petitioner) Versus The Govt. of India & three others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri M.A. Tandale, Advocate for applicant. Shri Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1. Shri N.R. Shaikh, AGP for respondent nos.2 & 3. Shri P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate h/f Shri D.N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no.4. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 01.10.2010 PER COURT : Since we have condoned the delay, office to register this civil application for review. - 2 - This review application is heard for admission at the request of learned counsel for the parties. The Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 17.11.2009 dismissed the Writ Petition No.3444/2008 on the ground that it was not inclined to entertain the petition in the extraordinary writ jurisdiction since the petitioner had alternative efficacious remedy to which the petitioner could resort to. The said order is sought to be reviewed by the applicant / original petitioner in this application. We have heard Shri M.A. Tandale, learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents. We have also perused the order of which review is sought for in this application. Upon considering the submissions and the order passed by Division Bench of this Court dated 17.11.2009, we do not find that there is any error apparent on the face of the record warranting exercise of review jurisdiction. Consequently, this application fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c1101019