r @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT miASPtIIl ANo...w Cy 2008 RQ /;" NT Ka. ^g»ieteKha»(Men^lfyteired), Dfo KailasliEihan Khai^^gedabout 25 yeaps, tfuoi^h KaiUi Bihari Khare^ S/o RamashflrikarEhaE^ qged R/6 RHE Cbloi^ KDsabal^ Kfli^ Dist-Kori3a(C.a> VERSUS RESPONDENTS I)i6N<3LAIMAINTS 1. SflnatKutnarAwasttifcSfo.tNe Ramldailawan AwaiSn,aiei9ttaaxnA 26yeacs, ^casteBftiHtihan, R/o Rampur Koabe^ Dist -Kbriaa (C.G.) <^^-§c?p^'- ^ SQntostiKuimrKha^Sfb ^<'^C^S^""" / ^ aQflamacfaatanKhare,Qgi8dl ^•^.^^y"" ^ 46yeaES,E^ca5teK£ysBtiia» ?^--"" RagendraNaga-KMb^DisC ^" Koiba(C.G.) \4^^NEdioaal Insuianoe OEKnpar^Ltid.. Qrandi Qffioe Kosabadi Koifc^ Distt.-Kort3a(C.a). APPEAL T3NDER SECTION l^ OF MOTOR ^M:ll ACT ^i^i^rt.^N WT.W^^^W 1 B"^ ^pn^zr^ ^t^T?^, f^Tray ^ 4 /^o • 3$>€ | O ^ ^•""•"'••"""-•"""••"""••••""••/""^200 S.B. Hon'Me Shri Justice NJK. Aaarwal 12-08-2009 Shri Sunil Sahu, couns^l for fhe appell^it. Shri Anand Gupta, cou|isel for respondent No.3. With the consent of th^ finally. The jnstant claimant's enhancement of the award c^ated 31-03-2003 passed by Additjonal Motor Accident (^laims Tribunal, Korba (for short 'the Tribunal) in daim and whereunder an amoun awarded along with mterest date of application towards appellant for the injuries sust^ined by him. Brief facts of the casd about 6.00 a.m. near the Q ^f^^''mwff ^-ft^ TN^-R ir partjes, the matter is heard appeal is directet seekir^ case N0.5S/2000 wher^y of Rs.25,OOQ/- h^ been |@ 9% per annum from the jthe claim preferred by the are that on 12-06-1998 at .C.M., Amlai Dhanpyri, the claimant Ku. Shweta Khare v^as traveling on Tempo Trax bearing registration No.MP ^6-E/4576 was coming from Jabalpur to Korba. The sajd ^ehtele (Tempo Tpax) lost jts balance and dashed against Ithe tree and due to the said accident, the appellant sustajped fracture in right wrist. ^. ^n^N ^"^N' ^^n^iTT^n??TF?—FS/95—11/2008—i ,00,000. W^i^TN^ ';^T^j^T/'^fteTre, f^iray . /v) A ^^. S^J<53 t^"1 ^<1^' The ciaimant preferr^d an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehi<tles Act (for short 'the Acf'), clajming Rs.2,10,0007- as 4ompensatjon against the driver, owner and insurer of thje offending vehicle (Tempo Trax). Learned Tribunal, ona^preciatjon of evidence led in the case and material pla^ed on record, passed an award awarding a sum of R425,000/- as compensation in favour of the appellant. Shri SuniJ Sahu, leame^l counsel for the appellant wou!d submit that as the api^ellant sustained fracture in the right hand wrist, therefor^, the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal is on low^r side. Per contra, Shri Gupt^, learned counsel for the Insurance Company/responctent No.3 supported the award andsubmitted that thje amount awarded In the facts and circumstances of th^ case is adequate and the appeal deserves to be djsmiss|ed. 1 have gone carefully gjone through the impugned award. The appellant clai^nant examined Dr. Sunil Khemka who treated the ^ppellant, opined that the ^ fe^ ^ ^mr^ ^R K^TC:^' n^Ht^n^—FS/9S—11 /200s—i,00,000. T XI-HC—78 3?7^T ^T'f^rNr ^8?T 3?l^T s^^ic?i W»RrlT<»»*(!cb 75ST ^i^Kn^, ^tii^4i<o, f^Krii^y ..^...^......t3t:..S...S^J.03.-^<2ee- 3TI^?T ^^V ( ytt^^) ^^TW^f^^n^r -s wlho appeilant has not sustained appellant also examined an^ Shrivastava who has not treatedl only certlfjcate. In the said certill appellant sustained permanent <|1 5%. The learned Tribunal evidence and material availabjel version of Dr. Sunit Khemka and held that the appellant was and passed an award of Rs.25,( Having heard learned coui] the impugned award and materi^l am of the opinion that the any jrregularity in passing the jrfip facts and circumstances of awarded is adequate and is| jnterference, therefore, the ad dlsmissed and is hereby djsmiss^d No order astocosts. cftl^I<y1<flt *11^<nl*^f fe^ ipsi^K ^3TRm 377^1 pej-manent dtsabiltty. The Kher doctor Dr. D.K. |the appellant but issued Ipcate, he opined that the ^isabjlity to the extent of ^n appreciation of the |on record, beljeved the treated the appellant ^ot permanently disabled sOOO/-. |isel and having perused available on record, 1 Tribiinal has not committed jrlipugnect award. In the |he case, the amount not required for any ||>peal is liable to be Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^- F'~""~-