Civil Revision No. 412 of 2009 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 412 of 2009 Date of decision: 27.01.2009 Paramjit Singh ...Petiitioner Versus Jagpreet Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Bhavyadeep Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Civil Misc. No.2188-C-II-2009 Allowed as prayed for. Civil Revision No.412 of 2009 The order passed by the learned Trial Court directing the parties to maintain status quo qua suit property was affirmed in appeal by the learned Ist Appellate Court. The defendant-petitioner Paramjit Singh is in revision against that order of affirmation. There is plethora of law on the point that this Court would be reluctant to interfere with the exercise of judicial discretion by the learned Trial Court and the Ist Appellate Court unless, of course, there is material on the file to prove that the Courts aforementioned had committed a palpable error of facts and/or law in exercise of judicial discretion in the matter of disposal of the injunction application. Civil Revision No. 412 of 2009 -2- **** The contesting parties are siblings of each other. The plaintiffs-respondents claimed the property in dispute by inheritance; whereas contesting defendant-petitioner relied upon a registered testamentary disposition in his favour. It is apparent from the record otherwise that third party interest have already come in. The controversy, to be adjudicated upon between the parties, is with regard to the validity or otherwise of the plea regarding inheritance and also testamentary disposition. Both the Courts had exercised judicial discretion in appropriate manner by ordering the parties to maintain status quo. That order would prevent coming into picture further third party interest etc. In the light of the above discussion, the petition is held to be denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. In view of the fact that it is a matter between the siblings, it would be in the interest of justice if the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the trial itself within six months from the next date of hearing and it is so ordered accordingly. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. January 27, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge