IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revison No.391 of 2010 Date of decision:02.02.2010. Gurcharan Singh ...Petitioner Versus Punjab State Electricity Board and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not unmindful of the fact that he would be able to raise a plea before the learned Trial Court itself that the amendment allowed by the learned Trial Court had been raised by the party opposite belatedly. He further states that he would be able to argue before the learned Trial Court that the amendment of that plea, after as long as about 14 years, suffers from the vice of mala fides and after-thought. I am sure that the petitioner herein would be able to raise all the aforementioned pleas before the learned Trial Court . In the light of that observation of this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforementioned. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforementioned. February 02, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE