IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2011 / 20TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26924 of 2011(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- THE SECRETARY, GENERAL INSURANCE SURVEYORES AND LOSS ASSESSORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (GISLA), REG.NO.07/2010, 3RD FLOOR, NEW WAY BUILDING, RAILWAY STATION LINK ROAD, KOZHIKODE-673 002. BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHARAM.P, SMT.REKHA ARAVIND, SRI.E.SUBHASH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMNET OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110 001. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, INSURANCE REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (IRDA) 3RD FLOOR, PASRISRAMA BHAVAN, BASHEER BAGH, HYDERABAD, 500 004, ANDHRA PRADESH. R1 BY SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, A.S.G, R2 BY SRI. K.L.NARASIMHAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.26924/2011-M: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 31/03/2010. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REMAINDER SENT TO THE R.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26924/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 12th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner claims to be the Secretary of an Association representing the qualified Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors. According to the petitioner, several persons who are unqualified to do the job of Surveyors and Loss Assessors are in the field and therefore, he made Ext.P2 representation to the second respondent for their intervention in the matter. The said representation is still remains unattended and therefore, the writ petition is filed. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent as also the second respondent. 3. Taking note of the grievance highlighted in the writ petition and the pendency of Ext.P2 before the second respondent, I dispose of this writ petition directing the second respondent to deal with Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs