IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1939 of 2008(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.C.CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.CHELLAPPAN PILLAI, PRESIDENT, ENATHU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 2529, ENATHU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA- 691 526. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ENATHU POLICE STATION, ENATHU, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 4. SRI.SHIBU, SECRETARY, D Y F I AREA COMMITTEE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE Government Pleader MR.P A SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 1939/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.4.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE JT.REGISTRAR EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DT.11.12.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R3 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.13.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.17.12.2007 PASSED BY ARBITRATION COURT EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.18.12.2007 ADDRESSED TO THE JT. REGISTRAR BY THE PETITIONER EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DT.14.1.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R3 TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Writ Petition (C) No.1939 of 2008-E -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judgment Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner is the President of Enathu Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No.2529 in Pathanamthitta district. Alleging that under the leadership of the 4th respondent, certain persons are causing obstruction to the functioning of the bank, this Writ Petition is filed. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent submitted that the said respondent has no intention whatsoever to cause any obstruction to the functioning of the bank. This submission is recorded. If any obstruction is caused by the 4th respondent or his men, the petitioner may inform the third respondent and in that event, the third respondent shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE 06.02.2008 P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE sta 2