f'R-NO-?SSz&^^. presentedbvSW^^..^.......»-- e fB( ^^fc.> ^ft^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER RESPONDENT A A b WRIT PETITIONNO. /2006 Smt. Leela SahuW/oAshok kumarSahu Age about 38 years, R/o Shubhash Nagar Bhilai, Distt. -Durg (C.G.) VERSUS <^ 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Educational'DepartmentRaipur(C.G.) 2. DistricEducationOfficer Durg (C.G.) .^^.^ -„.-.... ....-„ .„.-.„-::- .<)' Av 4-WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ^^ / c\ o- \~ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i» XI-HC-78 *<IHWI awrqi 3^'^fFTTcPl', (SiTnu'IS, (sK'll'My .^e..^wlp.t. ^ 200 3TT^?T 4ath (licllA'sl<<.CT) 311^T ^iT R-<i<ti (raT3:[l^Tsh>liqi I ^^' ??aTW Bf?tT W^T 11.8.2006:- Heard Shri Ajay Shrivastava, oo| Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Adj The case ofthe petitioner is th^ as per the Instructions dated 24-12-9^ Teachers who have passed B.T.1., B.| 'oiilfi'fl-i iiti!iTffteil'<Ri«i< ^srl^Tan^T jnsei for the petitioner. /. for the State on advanoe copy. it she is working as Assistant Teacher and issued by the State of M.P. the Assistant |Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own expenses after 22»10-64 are entitted For two advance increments and order of Govemment is Annexure-P/)!;. The petit|oner passed the B. Ed. examination on her own cost in the year 1995 and a oertifi| petitioner has not been given the bene^ been granted two advance incfements| Court. Having heard learned counsel bate to that effect is Annexure-P/3, but the |it whereas, similariy situated persons have under the orders of the Tribunal and this 'or the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, withoul expressing any opinion of the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make ^ detailed representation along with copy of this petition raising all her grievances days from today and in tum, respondefit No.2 is directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the light of averments rfiade by the petitioner in this petition and in the representation also. If respondent !^|o.2 reaches to the conolusion that similarly situated persons have been granted tlfie benefit of t"/o advance increments and the petitioner's case is also covered fc|r grant of two advance increments on the basis of Government's order, then to p^ today, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, the| Parties are entitled for oertified tjopy of this order. to respondent No.2 within a period of 15 ss orders within a period of 3 months from petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.< Judge P.T.O. j*