-1- &h E §§E§Wf§ £ %1w2/~ In the Hon’ble High Court 0f Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G;) W.P.(S) No. ‘%’$>T% 2009 Purshottam Lal Dewangon,Aged 45 years Son of Tikarain Dewangon Lecturer (Maths) Govt. Girl’s Higher SecondarySchool, Patan, District Durg C.G. Versus Respondents ........... 1. State of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Deptt. D.K.S. Bhavan,Raipur 2. Director of Public Instructions. State Govt of Chhattishgarh, Pension Bada, Bairon Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Principal, Girl’s Higher Secondary School, Patan, District Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution 0f India for issuance of writ of Mandamus/direction or any other appropriate writ. ’WW m W m9 cx) $39k? ‘WTW Hi zoo 31mm (Wu) ‘ mmm SE Hon N‘r Justice ridnker Eiwai‘er "E3 Q? 2&gg' hri Somkant Verma cou sei for the petitioner a WWME‘‘aW $a1mm r With Shn Shashank Thakur PL for Challenge in this petiti n is to the order dated 29.6.2009 passed by respondent No.1 by which the petitioner has been transferred from Government irls’ Higher Secondary Schoo} Fatah Drstrict Durg to Government Higher Secorwdary School, Padaull District Sarguja. Contention of the coun et for the petitioner is that on his present place of posting, the etltloner has joined just in October, 2008 and in such a short span ftime he has again been shifted. He submits that the petitioner is a iecturer in the School Education Department and his post is no as such that he can afford to o to such a tar off place. At this stage, counsei for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the authorities direction for early disposal of the concerned. He also prays for representation so made. Accordingly, the petition l dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioner makes a repres ntation to the authorities concerned within a period of 1O days fro the date of receipt of copy of this Shri Yaswant Singh Th the respondents/State. g mm $20 110 311%“ 1m? (Wu) mwfzwia: . mafaaamim WW WW wmm ‘ $ammané¥l order, the authorities concernec shaH decide the same Within a further period of three weeks frorr the date of its receipt. Ti“ then rhe order impugned shall be kept in aheyence. ""‘ Pritink Diwaker Judge I Kr Sd/— er