THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.21704 of 2009 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that he is the absolute owner of the property bearing H.No.3-1-261/1, Christian Colony, Karimnagar, admeasuring 219.58 square yard, having purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated 11.07.2008. The respondent authorities, after due verification of the site and verifying his title and ownership, granted permission for construction of the house with approved plan vide permission No.BA/126/G2/192/2009, dated 12.04.2009. Though he was making construction purely in accordance with the sanctioned plan, the respondent authorities and their men were interfering with the construction work. Therefore, the petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.212 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, against the respondent-Municipal Corporation of Karimnagar, on 16.09.2009 seeking perpetual injunction and the same was adjourned to two weeks for filing counter by the respondent. Taking advantage of the same, the respondent authorities along with their staff, trespassed into his house and demolished half of the structures. Hence, this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation. The Commissioner of the respondent-Corporation filed a counter-affidavit denying the petition averments and stating that the petitioner filed O.S.No.212 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar seeking injunction and that on dismissal of the injunction petition, he filed CMA before the District Judge, Karimnagar and the same is pending. It is also stated that after knowing the said facts, the petitioner fabricated the building permission papers by forging the signatures of the competent authorities. Hence, the Corporation filed a criminal case against the petitioner before the Station House Officer, Police Station, Karimnagar-II Town, who in turn, registered a case is Crime No.336/2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the petitioner has proceeded with the construction without obtaining any permission from the Corporation and that suppressing all these facts, he approached this Court and obtained status quo, which is detrimental to the interest of the public at large. Hence, he prayed to dismiss the writ petition. In view of the above counter-averments, and since there is an allegation against the petitioner that he has fabricated the building permission papers by forging the signatures of the competent authorities, against which, a criminal case has already been registered, I am of the view that this is not a fit case to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 17.08.2010 va