nr'sff NKR t^\^n © \^&'5^. >^'/5-4y-''" .» ^v^...-' ^-%^"" ...••••"'^;0^"'' ^ ^. -3. S/o Shri agea ai Senior 54 years, Post in S.E.C.L., iery, Korea, General Manager (v S.E..C.L., Biiaspur District Bi!aspur (C. Chief Generai Deputy Region; S.E.C.L., Churcha ..i-1. Manager S.E.C.L., Churcha (R.O.), Districfc Korea (C.G.) 4. Sub Area lanager, , Churcha ( Korea (C.G, /^s^ s%... //" j % ^i^gS ^tt-X'K' LO^^ PFTITinMFR i j— 1 i s <\^ i ^ L—a'^ HlGH COURT OF CHHATTiSQARH^BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTlON !S) NO,^260LOF 2011 Gopai Yadav Versus Genera! Manaaer, S.E.C.L. & (Writ Petition under Articie 225 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Dr. Shailesh Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER rORAU (Passed on this 29th day of April, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearinfl for the patitioner submits that the saiary of the petitioner before the impugned :transfer was Rs.35.172/- and after transfer, his salary has been substantia!'y reduced to Rs.18,558/-. Thus, the impugned transfer order is bad in law. 2. The impugned transfer order dated 09.10.2010 is already under chaiienged before this Court inVV.P.(S) No. 6152/2010. According to the petitioner, by virtue of the order dated 09.10.2010, the salary ofthe petitioner has been reduced. 3. Be that as it may, for the same, no substantive petttion is rnaintainable. Thus, the petition is dismissed as wlthdrawn, on the reauest of the learned counsel for the petitioner, with iiberty to make approi petition i.e^W.P.(S) No. late application in the pending wril ! 52/2010. if sn ariviapri Sati Sd/- K.Agnihotri Judge ^