FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16015 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.137 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7022 OF 2009 (Rajureshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri K.T. Shirurkar, Advocate for applicnat Shri V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for R.No.1 to 3 Shri S.B. Solanke, Advocate holding for Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate for R. No.4. ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 22nd November, 2010 1. Heard. Rule was issued on 1.9.2010. The prayer for expeditious hearing of the contempt petition was refused. Now the learned counsel submits that there is urgency in the matter. Affidavit of respondents is on record. They have prepared master plans for grant of permission to open new senior colleges, which will lapse on 31.5.2010. Since that period itself is no more, I do not see any reason to entertain present application for keeping the contempt petition for final hearing at early date. Application lacks merits. Hence, same is rejected. However, liberty to move after three months. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/ca16015.10