IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 134 OF 2009 SUIT NO. 17 OF 2008 IN PETITION NO. 793 OF 2006 Ms.Yvette Fernandez ----- Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs. Ms.Neita Turner ----- Caveatrix/Defendant Mr.Aniket P. Nair a/w Ms. Manisha Paranjape i/by M/s Khaitan & Jaykar. For petitioner None for defendant. CORAM : V.M. Kanade, J. Date : 18th February, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. He invited my attention to the affidavit-in-support of the Chamber Summons. He has pointed out in paragraph 2 of the affidavit in support that the Advocate of the defendant informed by the Advocate of the plaintiff, that his client does not wish to pursue the above mentioned matter. A letter written by her to that effect is annexed to the affidavit in support. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support particularly in paragraphs 2 ad 3, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Office to proceed. ( V.M. Kanade, J.)