, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION I 2271 No. 5442/2011 PETITIONERS/ 1] Khoso @ Uday Singh S/o Tetku DEFENDANTS/ Rawat, aged about 50 years, NON-APPLICANTS 2] Alakh Ram S/o Khoso @ Uday Singh Rawat, aged about 28 years, 3] ‘Bhondal S/ o Khoso @ Uday Singh Rawat, aged about 26 yeaIS, A11 am R/o Village Tipavan, Police Station 8a Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ 11 Kaxtik Ram kS/o Ghana Ram PLAINTIFFS Yadav, aged about 60 years. 2] Vrindavan S/o Ghana Ram Yadav, aged about 57 years. 3} Puran S/o Ghana Ram Yadav, aged about 55 years. Both are R/o Village Tipavan, Police Station 85 Tahsil Palan', District Raipur (C. G.). 4] State of Chhattisgarh, Thmugh Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 4. Respondents No. 1 to 3 not noticed. I ORDER (Passed on 15/09/2011) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 22/ 1/ 2009 passed by First. Additional District Judge, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 18/2006 aliirming the order dated 23/ 9/06 passed by Civil Judge Class—2, Baloda Bazar in civil suit No. 87A/06 whereby temporary injunction was granted against the petitioners. 2. Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioners 85 Shn' Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for the State/ respondent No, 4 are heard. Order impugned perused. After lapse of more than 2 V2 years of tha order impugned, I do not find any illegality in the ordér impugncd mquiring any interfemnce in cxsrcise of supmvismy jmisdiction. Consequently, petiiion‘ is liable to be dismissed and is hereby 4. Interim application is also dismissed. dismissed. No ovder as to costs. Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge