IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20160 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NIFE FIRE SYSTEMS (P)LTD ,MOHAMMED HAJI BUILDING, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI 682 024, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.V.THOMAS. BY ADV. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. JOINT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX, I.S PRESS ROAD,KOCHI 682 018. 2. SUPERINTENDENT . SERVICE TAX OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX,I.S PRESS ROAD,KOCHI 682 018 BY ADV. SRI. THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20160 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P5 order has been passed by the first respondent without properly considering Ext.P3 'reply' and also Ext.P4 'notes of argument' submitted in the course of hearing. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the law stands declared on the issue, as stated in the note of arguments, which however, has not been analysed by the first respondent before arriving at the conclusion. It is in the said circumstance, that the petitioner has filed Ext.P6 petition for rectification of the errors apparent on the face of the record, and that the same is still pending consideration before the very same respondent. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P6 W.P.(C) No.20160 of 2010 2 application for rectification and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, of course after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Status quo as on today will continue till such time. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. nj.