IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 533 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.1.2009 Anil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Veena Kundrai and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated December 5, 2008, whereby the case has been fixed for arguments. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on account of death of Pritam Singh his LRs were brought on record and the Court is proceeding and hearing arguments without serving all the legal heirs, who though have been brought on record. However, I do not find any merit in the submission made. As is noticed from the pleadings Pritam Singh left his widow, three sons and two daughter. One of the son is appearing. Service of other LRs except one daughter was complete but they did not appear. It is not a dispute inter-se between the LRs which is being decided by the Court rather the LRs have been brought on record to pursue the case which was already pending to determine the lis between the deceased person and opposite party. The LRs will step into his shoes to persue whatever rights he had in the litigation. Accordingly, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 30.1.2009 JUDGE Reema