HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.23482 of 2011 Date: 25-8-2011 Between Chaitanya Educational Society, Rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent, V.Hanuma Reddy, Markapur, Prakasam district … Petitioner and National Council for Teacher Education, Southern Regional Committee, Bangalore, Rep. by its Regional Director and another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.23482 of 2011 Order: Heard Smt. G.Jhansi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Vinayaka Swamy, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent. Both the learned counsel agree that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by orders of this Court in W.P.No.4707 of 2011, dated 09-3-2011. 2. The brief facts are that the petitioner-Society is running a college imparting B.Ed., and M.Ed., programmes in the name of Chaitanya College of Education, Markapur, Prakasam district. It submitted an application on 31-01-2004 seeking recognition to impart education in D.Ed., course for the academic year 2004-05. Inspection of the premises is said to have been conducted on 29-3-2005 and on noticing a deficiency, the 1st respondent served a notice dated 29-7-2005 on the petitioner-Society. Thereafter, the petitioner-Society offered its explanation on 10-8-2005. It is stated that even though considerable time has elapsed, the said application dated 31-01-2004 was kept pending. However, subsequently, a further show cause notice dated 01-10-2008 appears to have been issued calling upon the petitioner-Society to submit explanation to certain deficiencies pointed out therein. Thereupon, a decision appears to have been taken in pursuance of the said notice dated 01-10-2008. It is the specific case of the petitioner-Society that the notice dated 01- 10-2008 was not served on it nor the decision communicated. This Court having regard to the said submission called for the record and a perusal of the same shows that the said proceedings were not communicated on the petitioner-Society. 3. In similar circumstances, this Court in W.P.No.4707 of 2011 dated 09-3-2011 set aside the orders impugned therein and permitted the petitioner to comply with the objections/deficiencies within a time frame, with a further direction to consider the matter afresh. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that the decision said to have been taken shall be treated as non existent and the petitioner-Society shall be permitted to comply with the objections/deficiencies pointed out in the letter dated 01-10-2008 within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such compliance, the 1st respondent shall consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 25th August, 2011. Note:- Issue C.C. by tomorrow. (B/o) Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.23482 of 2011 25th August, 2011. (Ak)