-1- g‘ww‘m w \Iwhfiqbfv; wgg-‘iéi- /’ C’p W ?/ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P.(S) No...../;}.Cé ...........0f2o11 PETTIONERS 1. Smt. Jayshree Garad, W/o Shri Y.R. Garad, aged about 57 years, Govt. Middle School, Sejbhar, Block Dhagwa, Distt. Raipur C.G. 2. Smt. Yogeshwari Mahadik, W/o Shri /, S.R. Mahadik, aged about 46 years, Govt. College of Education Shankar Nagar Raipur C.G. Versus Respondents ,, 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur C.G ......../ / 2. District Education Ofhcer Raipur C.G. WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/ DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. / ‘ WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 178 of2011 : Smt. Jayshree Garad & Another. VERSUS : The State of Chhattisgarh & Another. RESPONDENTS ’ ' Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for th State. (Passed on 1 day of January, 201 1) 3 1. The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers on a fixed pay of Rs. 1200/-. Atter completion of their probation period, they were granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date initial appointment, or aiter completion ofprobation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh .f: ‘ State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State ofMP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale wet the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme HIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Honble Shri Satish K. Agnillotli, J. e ORDER ORAL Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale hom date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue inAmar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others [W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances and in tum the concemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the.date of receipt of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are gamed liberty to make a representation raising all their grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 6. In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit