^ c i'i€yo ' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR E^ WRIT PETITION 601 N0. <>1 ^l^ V /2007 ^ u^ ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS n"^^ ^^ ?%^-'" ^'^s^ ^' y <^-^--" ^" rV^'i •-•• •' '^ft-t* ^CM^- ^a C1.^x " " ~^^ »-^/"if/>- Vishwavijay Kanwar S/o Late ShriNirmal Singh Kanwar, aged about 22 years, R/o village - Tilteja Police Station-KotwaIi, District- Korba [C.G.] VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] Inspector General ofPolice, Bilaspur Range, District Bilaspur [C.G.]^ 3] Superintendent of Police, Korba, District - Korba [C.G.]. 4] Officer in-charge, Police Station- Kotwali, District Korba [C..G] WMT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^-•^-^•vjwwm'-'^- HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C»N0. S434 OF 2007 Petitioner Vishwavijay Kanwar Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Ms. Meena Shastri, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents. ORDERfORALt (Passed on 31st day ofAugust, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submlts that after filing ofthe instant petitlon, Bhuyneshwar Sao & Shankar Sao have surrendered at Police Outpost- Urgaon 31/10/2CX)7 in connection with Crime No.825/2006. Thus, nothing survives In this petition for adjudication at this stage and the petltion has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for other sidedoes not controvert Vhe above submission. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed, as having beeome infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok