IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-7006 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.03.2011 Vaneet Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. A.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Record reveals that petitioner has promised with the complainant to arrange permanent visa for Singapore. Having charged money, husband of the complainant and complainant were sent to Singapore on tourist visa instead of permanent visa as promised. After reaching Singapore, co-accused Harjit Singh demanded balance amount; so Rs.2,14,000/- were deposited in the account of Harjit Singh co- accused by the relatives of the complainant. From the contents of FIR, present case seems to be a case of human trafficking for which detailed interrogation seems to be justified. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (Alok Singh) Judge March 07, 2011 R.S.