IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7395 of 2010() --------------------------------------- ( CRIME NO. 1259/2010 OF CHAVARA POLICE STATION KOLLAM DISTRICT) -------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ---------------------------------------- RAMESAN, S/O.NANU, RATHEESH BHAVANAM, EAST OF T.S.CANAL, CHERUSSERI BHAGOM, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.GIRISH RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVARA POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHIWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.7395 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated this the 19th day of November, 2010. ORDER Petitioner, who is the 1st accused in Crime No.1259 of 2010 of Chavara Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 302 r/w Section Section 149 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 05.09.2010. The petitioner was arrested on 07.10.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not B.A.No. 7395/2010 : 2 : inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. In case the petitioner is a cancer patient requiring treatment in the R.C.C, the jail Superintendent concerned shall provide adequate treatment to the petitioner. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) rv