IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.342 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2722 OF 1997 Pune Municipal Corporation ...Applicant V/s. Shri.Balkrishna Ramakant Diwate (Since deceased) by his legal heirs and legal representatives: 1(a) Smt.Surekha Balkrishna Diwate & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Sanjeev J.Rairkar for Applicant. Ms.Jai Mhaskar i/b Mr.G.S.Godbole for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 20, 2009. MARCH 20, 2009. MARCH 20, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the Application being sufficient cause, in the interest of justice, Application deserves to be allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). : 2 : 2. Counsel for the Respondents, however, points out that the deceased Respondent has left behind a will in which he has appointed Respondent No.1A as the guardian of Respondent No.1(c). That, however, would make no difference for considering the present Application. 3. In the circumstances, application is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). 4. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today, failing which, Writ Petition to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.