1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. A. L. No.117 of 2008. IN Company application NO.27 of 2008. In Company Petition No.1 of 1997. M/s Rahul & Company Vs. The Official Liquidator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Tushar Darda, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Anjan De, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 07th May 2009. 1. Learned Advocate Shri Tushar Darda states that the Official liquidator has filed his report on 20-8-2008 at Stamp No.9353 of 2003. It is seen that if such report is filed in Company Application NO.117 of 2008, its original should have been 2 appended the CLA No.117 of 2008, but it is not seen with the application. 2. Office is directed to locate the said report and tag it to this application. 3. Learned Advocate for the applicant then pointed out that this Court has already passed the order in C. A. No.117/2008 on 3-10-2008. It is seen that Farad order dated 3-10-2008 does not reflect from its top, as passed in Civil Application. After reading, it reveals it refers to C.A. No.117 of 2008. 4. This Court has observed that when various Private Secretaries/Stenographers/Personal Assistants take down the dictation, while doing so and or scribing the order, they do not write down the number of application in which order is being dictated and transcribe the case number in their orders. If they do not understand, they should seek correct case/application number from Court Shirestedar. The observation contained in para 4 above be brought to the notice of all Private Secretaries/Stenographers/Personal Assistants and Shirastedars. 3 5. It has also been noticed that in various Civil applications, which are decided, the orders and locate passed therein are not properly filed and those applications are repeatedly listed as undecided. This causes the Court embarrassment and inconvenience. 6. In so far as the present case is concerned, Office is directed to verify all orders passed in the application No.117 of 2008, and transpose the original as Farad orders of Civil Application and keep copies thereof in the main matter. 7. Stand over to 18-06-2009. JUDGE Sbm