IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3500 OF 1996. WRIT PETITION NO.3500 OF 1996. WRIT PETITION NO.3500 OF 1996. Nandu R.Mirwankar ..Petitioner. V/s. Anandnagar Co-op Housing Society Ltd and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr H. S. Venegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr S. D. Rayrikar, A.G.P. for the Respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 25.7.2008. DATED: 25.7.2008. DATED: 25.7.2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the petition. 2. This Petition is directed against the order dated 29.2.1996 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Region,Mumbai in R.A. No. 194 of 1994 confirming the Certificate of Recovery issued by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Thane dated 8.6.1994. 3. Firstly, the Petitioner has not filed with the petition order directing the issuance of the recovery certificate. Secondly, he has also not produced the reply filed before the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies. However, on the basis of typed copy produced before me, he tried to canvass that the payments, which were already made, have not been accounted for. He has also tried to show the original receipts which are in his possession, which were, admittedly, not produced before the Co-operative Court. The contention sought to be raised before this Court has also not been raised in the Trial Court. Consequently, there is no consideration or finding, in this behalf in the order of the Revisional Court. 4. The Revisional Court has found that no compound rate of interest was applied and that the petitioner did not make payment from August 1984 onwards. Receipts sought to be produced are only showing payments made till July, 1994. In this backdrop, it is difficult to find fault with the impugned order. This is the solitary contention canvassed. 5. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)