g 2 '^ 1ii.?i £"i— c . ^ <\t3a IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATnSGARH WRIT PETITION (S( No. ^oAS /2010 Petitioner Nandkishor Gulhara, S/b Late B.L Gulhare, Aged 55 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Revenue Inspector, MunieipEil Corporation, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, R/o Godpara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Versus Respondents /^\. State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough its Secretary Department of Urban Administration, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, C.G ^^. Municipal Corporation, BUaspur, through its Commissioner, Vikas Bhawan, Bilaspur, C.G ^3. Deputy Commissioner SE Enquiry Officer, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Vikas Bhawan, Bilaspur, C.G WRIT J'ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOIL OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC., IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLEWRIT OF LIKENATURE The above named petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under: - 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As mentioned in the cause title. T v^ XI-HC—78 ?sr '^rai^R, yTlly'IS, fsRTRTy ...'W..P;.§i1AA..:,3.QEf.'^ 3n^?r'cra?T ('ipf3^r) ss^V w Vw^b ^ffsn^Tsp^tqr wnw ^iftn sii^r SBj Hon bie Shri manitldra Mohan $hrivastava, J. 01-07-2010 Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, counse Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Pa^iel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1 on aavance copy'. The ^rie'vance of Ihe petltiorier; departmental Inquiry is being cond documents demsnded by the petition^r ^r^ nut being supplied to hiiT! wuic!1 constitute serious infraciion of principie^ Learned oounsei for the petit]o| P/2), which vvas filed even before subrn^sion of inquiry report as aiso appllcation (Annexure P/4). It is argued that thoug |iven, the other reievant docurnents hai^e not been supplied. upon ueiiiy inqu as io w( iearned counsel for the petitioner subn Wilh the aforesaiu observations, Cerfified copy today. *bl<rf?T^*1 's?W?ff ^f fe^ <Pl<^!< ^afRnail^I Tor THe peuiioner. ;as highlighted in the petition is that the ^cted against the petltioner, but the of naturai justice. ser refers to the appilcatlon (Arinexure t the stateiTierits 01 vvttriess^ have been lic-h other documents v»ere uemanded, its that the docurnents which have been id charyes pro'v'ed, 'vvere recjuired to be ner 10 rnove ai roprlate appiication .to reiiea upon Dy ine inquiry onicer to nq suppiied, it wouid be open for the petltiif specify the uocuments which he needs |or his defense. in case, such appiication is fiied before the Commissioner withiij 7 uays frorn today, the s-ame shaii be taken into consideraiion by Ihe cornp^teni authority and appropriate decision tTiay be taRen in accordanoe with iaw. he petition is finaiiy uisposeo off. Sd-/ ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge w,