IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2008 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37721 of 2008(N) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. A.A.LUKHMAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.A.M.ABDULLA, AMMANAM VEETTIL HOUSE, EDAVANKAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED SHERIF, AGED 32, S/O.R.M.ABDULLA, PLEASANT VIEW HOUSE, R.V.PURAM P.O., THRISSUR. 3. A.T.SHANMUGHAN, AGED 31, S/O.THAMBI .A.O ARUPATHNAZHI HOUSE, VAKERI P.O., SULTHAN BATHERI, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 4. SATHEESH M.B., AGED 31, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN, MAIMBILLY HOUSE CHERPU P.O., THRISSUR. 5. JIJU JAMES, AGED 29, S/O.JAMES, KALEKATTIL HOUSE, KIDANGOOR P.O. KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 6. BEENA DAVIES, AGED 30, D/O.N.P.DAVIES, NEELAMKAVIL HOUSE, NEHRU NAGAR, KURICHIRA P.O., THRISSUR. 7. SHINCY T.P., AGED 37, W/O.K.A.MUHAMMED, ALICE NEST, CHIYYARAN P.O., THRISSUR. 8. JAYALEKSHMY K.V., AGED 42, D/O.K.P.VELAYUDHAN, K.T.NIVAS, KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, NEDUMPUZHA P.O THRISSUR. 9. MANIYAN NELLIKANDAM, AGED 31, S/O.VELAYUDEN, NELLIKANDAM, VAKERI P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ANISH LUKOSE SRI.JACOB E SIMON WP(C).No. 37721 of 2008(N) -2- RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. KOZHIKODE - 673 635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. KOZHIKODE - 673 635, BY SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C)No. 37721 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of December, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed the B.Tech Degree Course during the academic year 2003-2007. They failed in one subject, viz. “High Speed Digital Design' of the Sixth Semester. They submitted Exts.P1 to P9 applications for revaluation and seek a direction to the respondents to compete the revaluation process expeditiously. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University who would submit that the University would require at least two more months' time to compete the revaluation process. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioners have submitted Exts.P1 to P9 applications and publish the results thereof, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The above is subject to the further condition that the applications are in order in all respects. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs