IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20183 of 2009 1. DULARI DEVI 2. CHINTA DEVI 3. LAKSHMINIYA DEVI ---------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.3 Lakshminiya Devi and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner no.3 is permitted to correct the name of husband of petitioner no.3 in the application for anticipatory bail. As submitted, the FIR in the case is lodged after 25 days of the incident, the demand of dowry behind the death not believable, finding the solemnisation of marriage more than seven years ago, later a petition filed on behalf of the informant exonerating all the family members including the petitioner, taking that into consideration, husband of petitioner no.3 has already been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court and husband of the deceased is in custody. Petitioner no.3 is younger gotni, having her status similar to that of the deceased, so basing the same, the arrest of petitioner no.3 - 2 - cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner no.3 (Lakshminiya Devi) shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Akbarpur P.S.Case no. 66 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI