IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM . No. M 3106 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.04.2009 Raj Kumar @ Raju ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr.R.S.Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Parduman Yadav, DAG, Haryana. *** A.N. Jindal, J. The Case was registered on 04.03.2007 regarding the incident, wherein Rameshwari died and Raghvir complainant suffered injuries. The petitioner-Raj Kumar alias Raju did not cause any injury to the deceased though he was holding a lathi. The injury attributed to him was found to be simple in nature. Mr.R.S.Rai, Senior Advocate has stated that the accused party also suffered injuries. Mr.Rai has categorically mentioned in Para 6 of the petition that the complainant party also caused injuries to the accused. That apart the petitioner is in custody for the last two years. Trial is not likely to be concluded at an early date. Under the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nuh. April 02 , 2009 ( A.N.Jindal ) amrit Judge