:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2240 OF 2008 Anant Gajanan Deshmukh ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharshtra ..Respondent Mr. Abhaykumar Apte for applicant. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date : November 17, 2008. Date : November 17, 2008. Date : November 17, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate appointed for the applicant who has preferred this application through jail is not present. On request of the court, Mr.Abhaykumar Apte has kindly consented to appear in the matter. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The applicant is facing prosecution in three cases i.e. C.R. No.31 of 2006, C.R. No. 524 of 2005 and C.R. No. 440 of 2005. All cases pertain to Naupada Police Station, Thane. The applicant has preferred this application through jail for :2: expeditious disposal of the said cases. It is his grievance that he is not being produced in the court in the said cases and hence the trial is getting delayed. The learned APP, on instructions, states that the applicant had been granted bail in C.R. No. 524/05 and C.R. No. 440/05. However, now, the applicant has also been granted bail in C.R. No. 31 of 2006 on 22/10/2008. The report tendered by the learned APP is taken on record. 4. In view of the fact that the applicant is on bail in all the three cases, it is not necessary to entertain this application. Hence, this application is disposed of. 5. Office to pay the fees, as per Rule, to Mr. Abhaykumar Apte. (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.)