1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.375/2009 Satnamsingh S.Arora Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.V.B.Pandey for the applicant Mr.S.A.Shaikh,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . Heard. 2] This Revision application is filed against the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 6/4/2009 rejecting the application for discharge of this applicant accused. 3] This Revision Application is filed before the High Court on 16/4/2009. 4] The learned Additional Sessions Judge after rejecting the discharge application on 6/4/2009 has framed the charge against the accused on the same day. The Revision Application is preferred after the charge was framed. 2 5] Such Revision Application after framing of charge is not maintainable. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the practice of rejecting the application of discharge and framing of the charge on the same day by the learned Sessions Judge is objectionable as it takes away the right of the accused to invoke the Revisional Jurisdiction of this Court. 6] These submissions of the learned counsel are not convincing. It is the right of the accused to have speedy trial and immediately after rejecting the discharge application the Trial Court has taken speedy steps . Hence there is no need to interfere in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. Revision Application stands rejected. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)