CWP(T) No.8060 of 2008 07.7.2009 Present: Mr. S.S. Sood, Advocate vice counsel for the petitioner Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondents. The petitioner was initially appointed as Mate in the year 1989. He has worked as Mate and Beldar. He has also worked as Chowkidar for a short duration. He was regularized as Beldar. The case of the petitioner is that he should have been regularized as Mate. The respondent-State has placed on record the detail of working days of the petitioner. A bare perusal of this Annexure reveals that the petitioner has primarily worked as Beldar before his regularization. He was working as Beldar at the time he was regularized. Accordingly, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 7, 2009. (rkv)