GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1003 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1003 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1003 OF 2005 Pradeep Hingorni and ors ...Applicant versus The Union of India and onr. ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Lalit Chari with Ayaz khan for the petitioner. Mr. D.N.Salvi for Repdt. no.1 Mr. B.H.Mehta APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.C. V.C. V.C. DAGA, JJ. DAGA, JJ. DAGA, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 7TH JUNE, 2005 7TH JUNE, 2005 7TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition the petitioners seek to challenge the appointment of certain special prosecutors to prosecute cases under the NDPS Act of 1985. Such application was therefore moved before the learned Special Court and the learned Judge has with reference to section 24 of Cr.p.C. and Section 36 (C) of NDPS Act of 1985 held that the appointment and continuance of the special prosecutor in his court was proper. 2. We have considered the submission made at the bar and we have perused the provisions of secs. 24 of Cr.P.C. and 36(C) of NDPS Act of 1985. A cohesive reading of both the sections very clearly establishes that the appointment made in the year 2000 and thereafter in the year 2005 were in accordance with the law. Hence there is no substance in this petition. Petition is therefore rejected. ....