IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3988 of 2009 Date of Decision : 10.09.2010 Kartar Singh ... Petitioner Versus Punjab State Electricity Board & anr. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S.Matewal, Advocate for the respondents. *** HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The challenge in the present revision petition is to an order dated 14.02.2008 passed by the learned trial court and in an appeal order dated 07.10.2008 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, whereby the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC for grant of ad interim injunction, was dismissed. The grievance of the petitioner is that an order of punishment of recovery amounting to Rs.2,49,684/- has been passed against him without considering the reply submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner has sought stay of the recovery of the aforesaid amount by virtue of the interim order. The petitioner has been imposed minor penalty of recovery amounting to Rs.2,49,684/-. By virtue of interim order, the petitioner cannot be granted the relief as claimed in the suit itself. In view of the above, I do not find that the reasons given by both the Courts below suffer from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. 10.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) sonia JUDGE