IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13312 of 2000 Between: G.Radhakrishnaiah S/o. Adaiah Sri Venkateswara Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd., Gajulamandyam, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director of Sugars & Cane Commissioner, Shakkar Bhavan, Mojamjahi Market, Hyderabad. 2 The Managing Director, Sri Venkateswara Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd.,, Gajulamandyam, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District. 3 Chairman. Sri Venkateswara Co-operative Sugar Factory Limited, Gajulamandyam, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District. 4 Chief Engineer Sri Venkateswara Co-operative Sugar Factory Limited, Gajulamandyam, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in giving promoting to the juniors to the petitioner to the regular post of Fireman/Kalasi and not considering the case of the petitioner and promoting the petitioner to the post of Waterman on seasonable basis, is arbitrary, unreasonable and violation of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitutional of India, consequently direct the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Fireman or Kalasi (regular) or in any other equivalent post on par with his juniors and grant all consequential benefits with retrospective effect on which date his junior were given promotion. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : MR.M.CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13312 of 2000 ORAL ORDER : Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, filed a letter, dated 18-11-2008, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 20-11-2008. NOTE: Issue C.C. by tomorrow. (B/O) Msr HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13312 of 2000 20-11-2008 Msr