IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26736 of 2011 Raju Pathak @ Raj Kumar Pathak, Son of Randhir Pathak, Resident of House No. 58 Nehru Nagar Patliputra, PS Patliputra, District Patna ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ---- Opposite Party ----------- 2 10.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 372, 414, 290 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4/5 of the Immoral Traffic Act. A Beauty Parlour was raided in the township of Patna and two of the girls have mentioned that the petitioner runs the Beauty Parlour through his men. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that he had taken the Beauty Parlour on lease for eleven months and has subsequently vacated the premises. Considering that two of the girls were caught on the spot and have stated that the petitioner runs the Beauty Parlour through his men, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)