IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45908 of 2008 PRABHUDAYAL SAGAR @ SAGAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case registered in 2003 under Sections- 302 and 120B of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that final form was submitted in 2003 itself when the petitioner was not sent for trial differing with which cognizance has been taken in the year-2008. Even as per allegations the petitioner was not present at the time of assault, but was suspected of conspiracy. Learned counsel refers to the following passage from the impugned order:- “No substantial material has been placed to show pre-meeting of mind or an agreement between the petitioner and other accused but then there is allegation that he had given out threat in the past.” For the same very reason after discussion of which the court below thought it proper to reject the prayer for anticipatory bail, this Court grants anticipatory bail. 2 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in G.R. No.992/03, arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No.248/03, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)