IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2006 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 32502 of 2006(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SRI.A.DORAIRAJ, RETD., H.S.S.T., XIV/285-(1) INDIRA NAGAR 1ST STREET, KUNNATHURMEDU P.O., PALAKKAD-13. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 4. AUDIT AND ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.32502 OF 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT Case of the petitioner in brief is as follows: Petitioner entered service as PD Teacher and retired after completing 30 years of service on 31.3.2002 as a PD Teacher, HSA and Higher Secondary School Teacher. On the basis of the option submitted, his pay was fixed. Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P2, which is an objection raised. The objection would appear to be inter alia that the pay drawn in personal scale is not admissible and the option for pay revision cannot be exercised beyond the date of promotion. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 before the fourth respondent. He is also relying on Ext.P5 decision. In view of the fact that petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 representation, I feel that a decision should be taken on the same. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the fourth respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P4 in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner also within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is open to the WPC.32502/2006. 2 petitioner to rely on Ext.P3 besides other contentions. Till a decision is taken, Ext.P2 will be kept in abeyance and I leave open the contentions of the petitioner against Ext.P2. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.