IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 21st day of December, 2009 Ist Bail Application No.1165 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ravindera .…. Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 103 of 2009, U/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. PS Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________________________ December 21, 2009 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the accused applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. with Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the allegations made in the FIR are civil in nature. He also submitted that co-accused Devanand has been granted bail by the lower court and another co-accused Anup Singh has been granted bail by this Court and the present accused applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of the parity. He further submitted that the accused applicant has no criminal history against him, who is in jail since 8.5.2009. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the accused applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Ravindera be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.12.2009 PRABODH 2