Criminal Misc. No.M-20411 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-20411 of 2011 Date of Decision : 19.12.2011 Kuldeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rai, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.Nitesh Singhi, Advocate for the complainant. * * * Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.(Oral) Counsel for the complainant has filed power of attorney with no objection from Mr.J.S.Dadwal, Advocate and the same is taken on record. On 11.07.2011 when the bail was granted to the petitioner, it was observed that the parents of the petitioner were already granted bail and all the dowry articles, mentioned in the FIR, have been recovered. He had also submitted that the petitioner was given a ring, chain and gold bangle (kada) at the time of marriage which he is ready to return. It was alleged that the other alleged gold ornaments were not in his possession. On the next date of hearing i.e. 02.08.2011, counsel for the petitioner had submitted that he had joined the investigation and had recovered a ring, chain and gold bangle (kada). This fact was also admitted by learned State counsel on instructions received from ASI Baljit Singh. Counsel for the complainant submits that the other gold ornaments i.e. Rani Har, kitti set and ear-ring are still to be recovered from the petitioner whereas, counsel for the petitioner submits that all these articles are with the complainant herself. Criminal Misc. No.M-20411 of 2011 2 This is a matter of evidence. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, , order dated 11.07.2011 is made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. The petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 19th December, 2011. JUDGE Seema-II Criminal Misc. No.M-20411 of 2011 3