IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2319 of 2010 ANJOOR CHAUDHARY, S/o Ramayan Choudhary. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 05.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant on recovery of a dead body instituted the present case stating therein that his son had disappeared and his alleged dead body was found in a mutilated condition. Thereafter a demand was made from the informant for return of his son from mobile phone. When he reached the house as directed by the caller he found a few persons standing there but they fled away and only the present petitioner was caught. He disclosed that his maternal uncle-in-law had asked him to make demands on the mobile phone and also explain how the money was to be paid. Obviously this was not an innocent call made by the petitioner on the dictates of his uncle-in-law and reveals his complicity. - 2 - In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial so as to conclude it within a reasonable time. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)