H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) No. 327 of2008 Vidvadhar Patel S/o Late Harischandra Patel, Aged about 40 years, Assistait Teaoher, Govt. Primary Sehool, Baraliya, Block Edueation Office: Raigarli, Distt: Raigai-h (C.G.) VERSU8 State ofChhattisgari-L Throu^i: Secretary School Educatioiiai Depaitinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) District Edueation OiBcer, District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block - Raigarh, DistrictRaiearh(C.G.') 1. 3. Sss^sS1^' WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Assnlhotri, J. Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arv-md Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORALORUER (Passsd onl6Blday of Jaaaary, 2008) 1. Learoed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for Ae Stete/respondente jointly submit tb.at tiie tact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are tbe samc to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporatton, Durg aiid another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed ofvide order dated 03.04,2006. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs, Mumdpal Corporation; Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirther whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. .^mit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge