THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24943 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of the premises bearing No.15-5-536, Osman Shahi, Hyderabad. He alleges that the fifth respondent is making construction in the immediate neighbourhood, i.e., in premises bearing No.15-5-536, and complains that respondents 1 to 4 have not taken any steps in spite of repeated representations. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The writ petition was listed for admission on earlier occasion. With a view to know the ground situation, the learned Standing Counsel was directed to verify from his client as to whether any portion of the road is encroached. Today, it is represented that the fifth respondent did not encroached into any road and as regards slight deviations that were noticed in the construction made by him, steps have been initiated. Once it emerges that the fifth respondent did not encroach into any road, the grievance of the petitioner ceased to exist. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. It is made clear that if the rights of the petitioner are in any way violated by the fifth respondent, it shall be open for him to file a suit seeking necessary remedies. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 27th November, 2009 Note: C.C. in 3 days. (B/o) Js.