IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 23028 of 2006 Between: 1 Radhadevi Bihani W/o.late Mahavir Pradad Bihani one shop bearing door No.11-5-6, R/o.Saraswathi theater junction, Srikakulam Town and district. 2 Pilla Niladri Rao S/o.late Sriramamurthy Prop.Shop No. , Door No.11-5-7, and 11-5-8, R/o.D.No.9-3-3-, Temple street, Srikakulam Town and district. 3 Andavarapu Ramarao, S/o.late Raja Rao Prop. Shop bearing dr.No.11-5-9, R/o.Kalinga Road, Srikakulam Town and district. 4 Vysyaraju Nagaraju S/o.Late Appanna Raju, Prop. Shop bearing Door No.11-5-10, and 11-5-11, R/o.Chowk road, Srikakulam. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Executive Engineer, Roads & Buildings Department, Srikakulam. 2 The deputy Executive Engineer, Roads & Buildings Department, Srikakulam. 3 The District Collector, Srikakulam district. 4 The chairperson, Srikakulam Municipality, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps for demolition of the structures belonging to the petitioners bearing door Nos. 11-5- 6, 11-5-7, 11-5-8, 11-5-9, 11-5-10 and 11-5-11 situated on Kalinga road, Srikakulam Town without issuing any notice, without initiating any proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act and without following due procedure prescribed under law as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unreasonable, unconstitutional, unjustified and unsustainable and direct the respondents to forbear from demolishing any structure or portion of the above said structures for the alleged purpose of road widening. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 23028 of 2006 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 21-8-2009. MVB.