f , wwom3 mzoox mm (Wu) mm 2-1 -2(3Q3:- Shy? P. aemioner. Shri Aiok Bakshi, counsel for res ohdent No.1. The' petiiioner has med the insta t petition being aggrieved by ihe cider of Annexure-A/S dated 22-1-2681 'whereb {earned Labour Court, Ramandgaon has 3assed award in favour of ’respondent .1 against the pe€it§oner and dec§ared ”emova? of respondent No.1 -fmm se 1§ce$ mea? and improger and fw‘iher " Wasted reinsiatemem with 70% back Learned counsel for the eemiof sobmas 1hat§e5oommi No.1 was dam; a 'aied’ musier roéi empioyee. He was not a regular empioyee, iherefore, o0 After a summary enquiry was :ooduoted and on the basis of summa enquiry, he was removed from services ’ wide order dated 19“? May 1994 (nnexure-A/H} on the aiiegations of embezziemem of large amount of’ ssenger tax as aiso for fabricating docume is r Sinaie Bench: Howwe Sim Bhirendra Misma. J. D§wakar, Sr. Advocate ‘t h Shri Ashish Surana, Advocate for thg ; wc ges. iepartmentai enquiry Was' necessary me removing respondent No.1. ssuing Show cause notices to resp ndent No.1, Learned Labour Court vi impugned order has heid rhe order of H ‘ d g 2 0 f a mergerm mmeww x ‘ araiwwm ¥ \ PETiTiONER Municipal Council .Dongragarh: through its Chief Municioel Oflicer S.K. Dubey, S/o SN. Dubey, aged ehoui 4O years. Dongregarh, Disrt Rajnandgaon (CG) -\iersus- RESPONDENT§ ,. 1. Dauiat Mishra. Coiieoe Road, ' ‘ Dongragarh, 91512.: Rainarsdgeon (CG) 2. i Presiding Officer. Labour Coon, Rajnsnégaon (CG) XI—HC 78 \\ I 111200 am m (Wu) mmm “gr- Wm1iwm %aimm - 223qu§w Gendiécied against him and ihe erde? ef iermina‘éiw caese‘d serémss s?igma r f ed *e me Weeem Jo' H ex; ”v, o d h mmm Fegiec‘ to eioz‘ime wxheeses d fey the? pmpoee; his 0pporh.mi?y te éeed d order Es sirictév 1v eccerdeace w§ éaw a} §ab§e en reeoré‘ené ne imen‘ereme i5 sexed deri Mo 1 Af§er free m was see 9p em Govemmae? Me netéimer Was - a sew§ces on the basie offmdirzgs Gfé wed ewgmseM owmwniiy i0 e zeependem Woykmee. Limp: ver in spéte of ¥ast epparbméty gram evidence was c5osed. ' The immign the same is based or; maier§ei a fer; l is ; have heard married some ortiei. Learned Labour Com hae ae-eee aneeared f0; the petiem In ¥1ese cEme e ee en 13w 2 9% “g evidence SEnee ne d z; e aei§§§ener t0 eséebiish miec 0{3‘ uce eweeme m eetebhsn mieconduct o§ €§1e t Herthe pamee. wave in rusedi e “dawned )aseed the Emeugned award wen e. mdieg ihei m epEie of bet oppceiimiiy given m him fer ances) his Qeeermniév m éeed evirjenee was weeiew J‘ 0ra§ evmence ea 0 x1 edéueee ue? ef reseenderzé Nee, E has been hem ihei / e :' w vg 2 e i n‘ u d m o “l t m I ierminaiian mega; omy on the gromd thai the pet§iioner has not adduCed any \ avidence t0 substantiate charge against respondent No.1 am m dom‘smemary evizience has been Wed esiab§§shin§ mEsconduci by resmndent No.1. Referrmg to the Qm’er-sheem of the Labour Cam, 51' wa$ argtsed that after fha peii%ianer’s ogpartumty i0 lead evidence WeS desed, 2m anmication fur germEsien m examiae witnesses mas wed. Howevet ihe same was re§ecéed and 5 Ea neiiiimer was act aEDwed staffifient gnmmmiy t0 Eead evidence am madame v) rmcumen‘is. ii wag a§sa argued‘ih'at the erder of ierminatbn was na$sed én the year 1%4 whewas {esgmdem NC- 1 c‘r‘a waged ‘he abma? Grier m € We yaar i ”Q7 0:": ihe ether, hand, Shri Aiek Bekshi, Qeamed counsei appearing {or respendem No.1 submiited thai reependent No.1 was temine%ed frem ihe mm H1200 mm (Wu) ,2»- mmm «imam Wmm WW‘iwm \ $Wm r ?he net]?inner hag faiied to e$iahiish misconducf and, therefoye, re3pendent No.1 sanna? be he3d gu§2tv far tiwe cmrged 1" been hem“ 3o be iiéagaL d é‘acts ihai respondeat N33! was workmen naied from thg services (m ihe bas§s Qf aaegaiiens of embezzEemgm (3'? pa$$engef as further “e ‘ihai resaonéent No.1 was (are is un-rebmigd evidence Er: *he Shaw a? emaSned unemnioyed after his tsafmina'kbnx t of {ewondem No.1 w§£h ?f}% back wage$ cheeis of *he Labaur Court fiied by the s of ow consmeied coma“ "hai me um m: r fa%!ed to aoouce exudence to estaoi'ssh méooonduct of resoeodom No.3 3S baS€ d‘cm maEeria! ava§$ab§e on {eoorsi There a exomse of Wm jurésdmion umier Artio?e n of intiEa.’ o‘eservoo 2o be o§$m?sseo am i5 aocoMiogiy dEomEssed“ No moors as ’{o cosis, 1§sconrjum Accardingiy, §1i$ iefmmatéan ws under the eeiiiianer emd he was te 9 ea r€ mum WHEC was heid on i- ka of dociimemsi a. r ihe netitéimer. Sincet séaiemeni 0f resgmméem No.1. iha‘i hg a? has dimmed reinstaiemeia . Afar ga‘m fbro'wh ‘he arde 0E%?%.Eone,r wiééw h s aom on 1h s Com of 157a abow 0mm hat me pe§t§ Wf3”<*1en im 3 a io no ii§ega§if nmmgix La%301§? Court waimmng imoooreace 225/227 of €ha Cowgim cw m asom’ ma! em rcw‘ni‘nc ox; W: z Toe ne baing mlwioué am; Subswrsoe t n Sdl‘ Judge WW mam Keeping in View oi? the undisoma n h J m .§ e o vg ,o