IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16042 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE MISHRI SINGH, RESIDENT OF DALSINGH SARAI, P.S. DALSINGH SARAI, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR ….. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PAWAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE MOTILAL CHAUDHARY PROPRIETOR M/S SHANKAR SALT COMPANY MARUFGANJ, P.S. MALSALAMI, DISTRICT PATNA …. OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2. 5.1.2011 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 31.3.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge XI, Patna in Criminal Revision No.601 of 2009, by which he has refused to interfere in the order dated 29.6.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist class, Patna City in Complaint case No.438 of 2005 allowing the opposite party no.2 to produce its witnesses after the petitioner had filed a discharge petition. From the orders impugned, I find that the courts below were of the opinion that the examination of the witnesses was essential for the just decision of the case and, therefore, I decline to interfere in the matter. However, in the interest of justice the complainant should be allowed only three months time from the date of receipt of the order without extension of the same for any reason whatsoever on payment of cost to the accused as directed by the trial court. With these observations, this application is disposed of. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )