IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27827 of 2010 MASOOD DANIYAL @ KITTU son of Shah Ahmad Naseem--------Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 8.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is alleged for receiving Rs.80,000/- from informant and one Raju for Visa to Saudi Arabia but he failed to provide any Visa rather a forged Visa was given to both the aggrieved. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner talked both the aggrieved to satisfy their grievance by returning the money. Raju agreed and filed compromise. Petitioner is ready to return the complainants’ money also but only by five equal monthly instalments. The money should be returned through Demand Draft or cash. In view of the above undertaking, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and also after depositing the first instalment through D.D. or cash , above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. case no.126 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is made clear that petitioner’s failure to deposit any of the instalments willfully may be taken for cancellation of his bail. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J.)