IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4130 of 2011 Date of decision : 08.03.2011 Narinder Kaur … Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Permod Kohli, J. Notice of motion. Ms.Anu Pal, AAG, Punjab at the asking of the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Copy of the writ petition has been furnished to the State counsel. With the consent of the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself without insisting for the reply. Petitioner retired from the post of lecturer on 30.9.2008 on attaining the age of superannuation. The State government has promulgated the enactment namely Punjab School Teachers Re-employment Act, 2006 whereunder all teachers who retire between 1st April of year and the last day of the month of February of the succeeding year are to be re-employed. In view of the provisions of the enactment, the petitioner was re- employed w.e.f. 1.10.2008 upto 31.3.2009 as is evident from the letter dated 4.9.2008 (Annexure P-2). The grievance of the petitioner is that she has not been paid the salary for the period of re-employment. The case of the petitioner has also been recommended by the Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School (Boys), Phillaur (Jalandhar) to the District Education Officer (S), Jalandhar vide letter dated 9.11.2010 (Annexure P-4) followed by another reminder dated 6.1.2011 (Annexur P-5). Keeping in view the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the claim of the petitioner with regard to the salary for the period of her re-employment in the light of Annexures P-4 and P-5 within a period of two months. In the event, the CWP No.4130 of 2011 [2] petitioner has actually worked, the amount payable to her shall be paid within a period of two months thereafter. ( Permod Kohli ) Judge 08.03.2011 sd