IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2011 / 19TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 94 of 2011() ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25501/2009 Dated 19/01/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 3 TO 8 IN WP(C) NO.255051/09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANNIE JOSEPH,W/O.JOSEPH,AGED 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKENEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. FRANCIS JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH,AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKENEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. LITTO JOSEPH,D/O.JOSEPH,AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKENEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. PAULOSE JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH, AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKENEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. JOHN JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH,AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKENEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. LINO JOSEPH,S/O.JOSEPH,AGED 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT THEKKENEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.KRISHNAN NAIR SRI.V.B.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN WP(C)NO.25501/09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. T.A.GEORGE @ SEBASTIAN,S/O.ANTONY, AGED 58 YEARS,THEKKINEDATH HOUSE,PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR VILLAGE,NORTH PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R.P.NO.94/2011 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,ERNAKULAM (RURAL),ALUVA,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NORTH PARAVUR POLICE STATION,NORTH PARAVUR POST, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.HARISH GOPINATH R2 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts R. BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.94 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of March, 2011 ORDER Basant,J. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. We are unable to accept the argument that there is any error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the order dated 19/1/2011. This review petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN (Judge) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge