IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28456 of 2008(K) ----------------------------------- OS.218/1980 of MUNSIFF COURT,KAYAMKULAM .................... PETITIONER : ---------------- CHINNAMMA IDICHERIYA,W/O.IDICHERIYA, PONVANIBHAM MULAMOOTTIL, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS : ------------------- 1. YOHANNAN VARGHESE, S/O.YOHANNAN, THATTARATHU THARAYIL, KAYAMKULAM MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE. 2. MARYKUTTY, W/O.YOHANNAN VARGHESE, THATTARATHU THARAYIL, KAYAMKULAM MURI, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------ W.P(c) No. 28456 of 2008 ------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Heard counsel on both sides. 2. Petitioner is the wife of the deceased decree holder in E.P. No.62/1987 in O.S. No.218/1980 of Munsiff's Court, Kayamkulam. She was impleaded in the execution petition consequent to the death of the decree holder. Decree was executed and later on the request of respondents, there was redelivery of about 2 cents already delivered over to the decree holder. Learned counsel submits that Exhibits P1 and P2 applications are pending consideration before the execution court and that those applications are not being disposed of. He prayed for a direction to the learned Munsiff for expeditious disposal of Exhibits P1 and P2. 3. There is no reason why a direction should be given for time bound disposal of Exhibits P1 and P2. At the same time, if a request for early disposal of Exhibits P1 and P2 applications is made by the W.P(c) No. 28456/ 2008 2 petitioner in the court below, learned Munsiff will consider that request and pass appropriate orders. With the above observation this writ petition is closed. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE scm