IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1637 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 1637 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 1637 OF 2006 Belman Shyama Kotiyan ] .. Petitioner Versus Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation ] .. Respondents Mr. V.B. Gupta i/b M/s. Gupta & Gupta for petitioner. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 08TH JANUARY, 2007 P.C. : . Heard. 2. The Writ Petition suffers from gross delay and laches and does not deserve to be entertained at this distance of time. 3. By means of this Writ Petition, the petitioner prays for quashing the Notice dated 2nd September, 1999 issued under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966. The Writ Petition has been filed somewhere in the month of April, 2006 i.e. almost after five years and nine months of the said Notice. : 2 : Not only that, the counsel informs us that pursuant to the said Notice, the disputed premises have been demolished. 4. Writ Petition does not deserve to be entertained. It is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. Sd/- [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] Sd/- [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]