/' C^- ly^f^ CD IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^•G-') ^,. WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^L1 OF 2011 PETITIONER / Deharlal Sahu, S/o Late Shri Sakharam Sahu, aged about 73 years, R/o Village and Post Baghmara, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^l. Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) -3. Joint Director, Treasury Accounts and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) ^4. District Treasury Officer, Treasury Office, Durg (C.G.) ^5. Block Education Officer, Balod, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS \^y \-y ^•^y 9 ;! '^ ^teB^^^ "^^ .^.wV^S^ tf HIOHCQUR^OFCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (S) No. 764 of2011 Deharlal Sahu. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarii & Others. RE8PONDENTS WRTT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CgNSTrfUTIQN OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satfsh K. Aenihotil, J. Present: Sfari P.P.Sahu, Advocste for the petitioner. Shri Siishil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1,3,4 and 5. Ms. Neeliina Venna, Advocate fw the respondent No. 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 09U1 day ofFebruary, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner subnuts that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be refen-ed to the pension conmuttee. 2. This Court, m the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (BaijmthMandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keia Bai Chandrakar v. State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. V!o. 4642/2004 Baijmth *>[ «.^i^^'S?s'c''^;^;.,cSS:^gc.;[®g?^^;^^^^s;^ .&SS.~fek S -..^a^ ^ B'-* Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel ^)pearing for the parties. 3. This petition is aceordingly disposed ofinthe same tenns i.e. the ofBce ofthe Advocate General is directed to send the case to tiie Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date ofreeeipt ofa copy oftfae petition fram Ihe petitioner and this order. Thereafter, fhe Committee shall issue notice to fhe pedtioner and the ofBeers concemed, within a fiirther period of 15 days. The Committoe shall consider and pass order, in aceordance wilfa law, afler affording proper opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents, ifnecessary. The entire exercise, ineluding payment ofretiral dues, ifany, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis arder. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy ofthe petition to the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to theCommittee. Aimt Sd/- Satish K. Agaihotri Judge