1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.88 of 2001. Prem Prakash son of Shri Sedu Ram Chauhan. VERSUS Shri Radheyshyam son of Shri Gulab Chand & Others Date of Order :::: 10/11/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. K.N. Tiwari, Counsel for the Appellant Mr. R.S. Bhati } Mr. Rajesh Jain } Counsel for the Respondents *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the award of the learned Tribunal. In this miscellaneous appeal, a sole question, which has been urged by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the learned Tribunal has erred in not awarding the interest on the awarded amount of compensation. He submits that in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chameli Wati and Another Vs. Delhi Municipal Corporation and Others, reported in 1985 A.C.J. Page 645, the interest is required to be awarded from the date of filing of the application 2 till its realization. In the instant case, the learned Tribunal has awarded an amount of Rs.47,000/- as compensation, but has not awarded interest on the aforesaid amount, but has provided that in case the amount of compensation is not paid within 45- days of the passing of the award, the claimants would be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum. The respondents do not dispute the above submission based on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chameli Wati and another (supra). In the facts and circumstances of the present case, therefore, I deem it just and proper to award interest @ 12% per annum with effect from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e. 26.03.1999 up to the date of deposit of the amount by the Insurance Company with the learned Tribunal. The miscellaneous appeal stands allowed to the extent as aforesaid. There will be no order as to costs. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/