IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.579 of 2011 INDRADEO PRASAD YADAV, SON OF LATE SHITAL PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANDALPUR, P.S. MUNGER, P.O. KASIM BAZAR, DISTRICT MUNGER. …….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER. 3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, SOUTH. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BHAWAN PRAMANDAL, MUNGER. 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, BHAWAN ANCHAL BHAGALPUR………….RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the respondents : None. ----------- 02/ 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents authorities to pay the remaining 10 per cent amount of the work done to the petitioner which has been deducted from the respondents authorities on frivolous grounds and for other ancillary reliefs. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file a representation before the concerned authority of Building Department with respect to the grievances raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, as according to him the delay was caused due to none of his fault. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner before the authority concerned within fifteen days from today, the said - 2 - authority shall decide the same within two months thereafter and shall also pay the admitted dues to the petitioner. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)