AB 1321/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R.. SARMA Heard Mr. M. Bhuyan, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-responden t. Perused the Case Diary. Learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners, has submitted that the daughter of the informant eloped with Md. Abbuddin Sheikh following love affairs and that the petitioners are in no way responsible for the same. The allegation made against the petitioners, as revealed from the FIR, is that, on 18.04.2010, the petitioner No.1 i.e. Mustt. Amisa Bibi visited the informant’ s house and took the informant’s daughter on the pretext of going to the market and that the informant’s daughter did not return home thereafter. It is also sta ted in the FIR aforesaid, that, on being contacted, Mustt. Amisa Bibi informed t he informant that she did not know about the whereabouts of his daughter. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the materi als on record, I don’t find it to be a fit case to extend the benefit of pre-arr est bail in favour of the petitioner No.1. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arres t bail, made in favour of the petitioner No.1 Musstt. Amisa Bibi, is rejected. However, considering the entire aspect of the matter, I find no sufficient reaso n, requiring custodial detention of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, namely Musstt. Habi ba Bibi and Md. Nayab Ali Sheikh, in connection with the above mentioned case. Therefore, the interim order, dated 16.05.2011, granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, namely Musstt. Habiba Bibi and Md. Nayab Ali She ikh, is made absolute, subject to the condition that, they shall make themselves available to the Investigating Officer as and when so required for the purpose of investigation. With the above direction, this A.B. Application is disposed of. Return the Case Diary.