IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4240 of 2006(O&M) Date of decision: 26.11.2008 Sahib Singh .... Appellant versus Amritsar Improvement Trust .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellant for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from dispossessing him on the ground that the property in dispute had been acquired and compensation paid therefor and that in fact, the appellant had not been able to establish his possession on the property in dispute. In my opinion, the findings of fact arrives at by the Courts below cannot be termed to be perverse or not arising from the evidence of record. Learned counsel for the appellant has urged that there was overwhelming evidence to prove the possession of the appellant but in my opinion, it is not open to this Court to mechanically reappraise this in second appeal. Consequently, I hold that the proposed questions of law do not arise in this appeal and dismiss the same. No costs. November 26, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE