IN TH E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27784-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:20.09.2011. Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) CRM-50730-2011 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-M-27784-2011 This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.96 dated 02.06.2011, under Section 148, 149, 323, 325, 302 IPC at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and has been named by the co-accused in his confessional statement dated 05.06.2011 (Annexure P-2). He further submits that the petitioner is a student and was in Jammu and Kashmir at the time of occurrence. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. It has been mentioned in the FIR that besides Seena, Sita and Raju, there were 4-5 other persons, whose names were not known to the complainant but he had claimed that he can recognize them if brought before him, had caused injuries resulting into the death of Devender. The confessional statement of Satish @ Sitta was recorded by the police on 05.06.2011 in which he categorically mentioned name of the petitioner who had participated in the alleged crime. Insofar as the plea of alibi is concerned, that has to be decided only after the evidence is led. In view thereof, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. September 20, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge