THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO.26707 OF 2011 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The first respondents’ (hereafter, the applicant) O.A. being O.A.No.8055 of 2008 for a direction to the petitioners herein (hereafter, the respondents) to promote him to the post of Lecturer in Education (Urdu) in District Institute of Education and Training (DIET) was allowed by the impugned order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (hereafter, the Tribunal) on 22.06.2010. Being aggrieved, the respondents invoked the judicial review. The admitted fact of the matter in brief is that the applicant while he was working as School Assistant (Urdu) became eligible for being appointed as Lecturer in DIET. In the selections held on 06.10.2005 he was successfull and duly empanelled. The same was communicated by the third respondent vide letter dated 24.04.2006 but he was not given the posting orders. The selection was approved by the Director of School Education (DSE) as well. He made a representation to third respondent, who, by a communication dated 13.10.2008, informed that it is not feasible to consider the request for promotion. On this cause of action, the applicant approached the Tribunal. A counter affidavit was filed offering explanations for inaction. Inter alia, it was alleged that the Andhra Pradesh School Educational Services Rules, 2005 promulgated vide G.O.Ms.No.95 Education (Services-I) Department dated 25.07.2005 were under challenge before the Supreme Court and therefore appropriate posting orders could not be issued. Nonetheless, it was also submitted that the DSE issued instructions to fill up the posts of Headmasters/MEOs/ Lecturers in DIET and accordingly, necessary instructions were issued to all the concerned. Taking this into consideration, the learned Tribunal allowed the O.A. directing the respondents to issue posting orders. The Tribunal passed orders on 22.06.2010. It appears the applicant moved a Contempt Petition complaining non- implementation of the order of the Tribunal dated 22.06.2010, which is pending. At that stage, the respondents chose to file this Writ Petition after delay of one year three months. As the Tribunal accepted the plea of the respondents disclosed in the counter filed before the Tribunal, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned. The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) ___________________ (K.G.SHANKAR, J) 28th September 2011 RRB