1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2826 OF 1994 High Court Bar Association thr R. L. Khapre Secretary Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri S. M. Puranik Adv for petitioner. Smt Dangre Addl. G. P. for respondents-State 1,2 & 4 to 7. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE JJ. DATED: 17th OCTOBER, 2011. After hearing respective counsel on 02.09.2011 this Court has passed an order. Taking note of the fact that petition is of the year 1994 similar order was again passed on 16.09.2011 noting that most of the issues raised in PIL were already taken care of. Shri Puranik learned counsel, however, has pointed out that necessary issues arising subsequently are also being agitated in very same petition by Bar Association in public interest and this Court has permitted that exercise. Accordingly time was given to learned counsel to segregate these issues or pending applications so that a fresh petition can then be 2 continued in public interest in relation to these issues. 1994 Writ Petition is already ripe for hearing and as such keeping it pending was not proper. Shri Puranik learned counsel had also taken time to obtain instructions. On 16.10.2011 he stated that accordingly Bar had decided to file fresh petition raising grievance about 5 pending issues. Those issues are: i] Construction and completion of incomplete domes; ii]providing proper fans in High Court corridors for advocates and litigants; iii]Arrangement for air-conditioning of bar rooms and library; iv]Providing chairs for litigants in corridors; and v] Water coolers at appropriate places. Today Shri Puranik states that he has already undertaken exercise of drafting a separate petition for this purpose. He points out that Civil Application Nos. 1621 of 2007, 2134 of 2009, 2260 of 2010, 1147 of 2011, 1702 of 2011 in which above mentioned 5 issues have been raised are still pending in present writ petition. In this situation we grant Bar Association time till 21.11.2011 to file appropriate public interest litigation to continue the exercise undertaken in Writ Petition no. 2826 of 1994. Issues pending in five civil applications mentioned above can also be taken care of in said Writ Petition. The Bar Association can provide copies of these civil applications along with reply if any, filed by other side in new petition to 3 be filed by them. We accordingly direct that as all other issues involved in this Writ Petition are already taken care of and as it is not necessary to keep the old matter pending, hence this Writ Petition shall accordingly stand disposed of on 21.11.2011 after filing of fresh PIL by Bar Association. JUDGE JUDGE svk