1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI H.C.P(MD)No.264 of 2011 M.Muthulakshmi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudhukkottai District, Pudhukkotai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Viralimalai Police Station, Viralimalai, Pudhukkottai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Keeranoor, Pudhukkottai District. 4.Murugesan .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce petitioner's husband namely P.Manikandan S/o.Palanichamy, aged 25 years, before this Court and set him at liberty and leave his custody to petitioner. For petitioner : Mr.L.Madhusudhanan For respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh (R1 to R3) Addl.Public Prosecutor For respondent-4 : Mr.Ganapathy Subramanian O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN, J.) The petitioner/wife has filed this Habeas Corpus Petition to produce her husband P.Manikandan, said to be missing from 22.03.2010. Since the complaint given by the petitioner to the respondent Police is has not been taken serious note of. Hence, he has filed this Habeas Corpus Petition for the aforesaid relief. 2.Today the detenu appears before this Court through counsel. The petitioner has also present. The 4th respondent, who is the father of the detenu, is also present before this Court through counsel. We enquired all of them. We could understand that there is a matrimonial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 misunderstanding between the petitioner/wife and the detenu/husband. However, the detenu/husband claims that he is living only with the petitioner and it is only the petitioner, who is not cooperating with him in leading a peaceful matrimonial life. 3.In view of the fact that there is only a minor misunderstanding and differences, which led to the wife filing this petition, we do not find any other ground to entertain this Habeas Corpus Petition, as there is no illegal custody. Therefore, this petition is dismissed. However, the learned counsel appearing on either side is advised to do counselling for this parties and resolve their dispute. No costs. MPK Sd/- Assistant Registrar[P&A] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudhukkottai District, Pudhukkotai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Viralimalai Police Station, Viralimalai, Pudhukkottai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Keeranoor, Pudhukkottai District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to Mr.P.Gamapathi Subramaniam, Advocate SR.No.17850. H.C.P(MD)No.264 of 2011 Dated:10.06.2011 2P/6C RPB 04.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/