Sk‘gig Saw . 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA TUREATBILASPUR CG. Cr. Revisian No.9 B $0]? 2006 APPLICANT : Newton @ Pinku Rai, aged about 23 years, S/o Dilip Rai, R/o Shaktigarh, thapa Chopna, Tahsil & Distt. Baitul ‘.(M.P.) u f i NON-APPLICANT : Smt. Shikha Rai, wife ofNewton Rai @ Pinku Raj, aged about 18 years, R/o Santoshi Nagar, Distt. Raipur, C.G. y, U $ REVISION U/S 19 (4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT M WK‘W " IN THE HIGH COURT 3F JUDICATURE AT BILAS?UR Criminal Revisicn No. 287 of 2006 N6wton @ Pinku Rai, aged about 23 ycars, S/o Dilip Rai, R/o Shaktigarh, thapa Chopna, Tahsil 8a Distt. Baitul (M.P,) Applicant Versus Smt. Shikha Raj, wife of Newton Rai @ Pinku Rai, aged about 18 years, R/o Santoshi Nagar, Distt. Raipur, C.G. Non-applicant REVISION UNDER SECTION 19 (4) OF THE FAMIL? COURT ACT u f (SE: Hon’bie Shri Justice T.P. Shanna, Judge) Present: s Smt. Indira ’I‘Ijpathi, Advocats for the Applicant. O R D E R (Passed on 19th February, 2008) 1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 13.4.2006 passed by the 2nd Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Raipur in M.Cr.C. No. 31/ 2005. 2. Dun'ng the course of argument, it is submitted on behalf of the apph'cant that the decree under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been passed in favour of the applicant and on the basis of such decree, the applicant want to adjudicate before the Family Court under Secu'on 125 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Want to withdraw this case. 4. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. y Sdl- l i T.P.Sharma i i Judgex l