1 ndm 88 wp.9106.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9106 OF 2010 IN EXHIBIT NO. 132 OF 2010 IN R.A.E. SUIT NO. 1661 / 5873 OF 1980 Suresh Parshuram Borukar Vs. Madhavlal N. Pittie and ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Rakesh D. Dave and Anil Chauhan i/b M/s. N.N.Vaishnawa and Company for the Petitioner. Mr. Mustafa Doctor and Mrs. D.A.Chhapgar i/b M/s. D.J.Kamdin and Company for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 1st December, 2010. P.C. 1 When this Court was inclined to issue rule, the learned counsel appearing for 1st respondent states that 1st respondent has no objection if written statement of the Petitioner is taken on record subject to payment of costs. 2 Considering the delay, the Petitioner will have to pay costs quantified at Rs.25,000/-. Hence, petition disposed of by passing following order: i. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to Petitioner paying to 1st respondent or depositing with the trial Court a sum of Rs. 25,000/- by way of costs within a period of four weeks from today; 2 ii. If compliance is not made within the stipulated time, the impugned order will stand. iii. Hearing of the suit is expedited and the trial Court is directed to decide the suit on or before 30th April, 2011. [ A.S.OKA, J ]