IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27313 of 2009 NAWAL MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH Cr.Misc. No.27480 of 2009 RAMBALI MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 20.8.2009 Heard both sides. Both the matters arise out of the same occurrence giving rise to Dumra P.S. Case No. 65 of 2009 registered under Sections 364, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation, the deceased who was residing at his Nana’s house for study was called in by accused Sunil Kumar Mandal on the plea of watching a movie. The victim thereafter did not return home. He is still traceless. Learned counsel appearing in support of Cr. Misc. No. 27313 of 2009 submits that the only material found against him is that both the F.I.R. named accused were arrested from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel drew attention of the Court to para-3 of the impugned order. Counsel appearing in support of Cr. Misc. No. 27480 of 2009 submits that he is the father of 2 the named accused, who is said to have called the victim on phone and took him along. Learned counsel also drew attention of the Court to para-3 of the impugned order. It is contended that apart from the fact that the father of the accused Sunil Kumar Mandal, there is no other tangible material on record to connect him with the present case in any manner whatsoever. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B.N. Jha, II Additional Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi respectively in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 65 of 2009, subject to condition that one of the bailors should the own/close family members of the petitioners. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)