WP(C) 1896/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A.M. Majumdar, learned Sr. Counsel, assisted by Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel, for the respondents. The challenge made in this writ petition is the Annexure-NIT dated 28.4.2008. Ac cording to the petitioner, he is a intending tenderer, but is aggrieved by claus e 2, 3 and 5 of the NIT, which read as under: 2. The general standing committee of Zilla Parishad has the power to accept or r eject any tender as their choice. 3. Preference will be given to the highest bidder. 5. Zilla Parishad is not responsible for granting remission for the loss caused by natural calamities. Upon a reference to Rule 49 of the Assam Panchayat Regulation (F) Rules 1990, Mr . Majumdar, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid cl auses in the NIT are opposing of the mandate of the Rule 49 of the aforesaid Rul es. Ms. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel was requested to obtain instruction i n the matter has produced the letter dated 19.5.2008 addressed to her by the Chi ef Executive Officer, Nagaon Zilla Parishad, Nagaon. As per the said letter, nec essary correction in respect of clause 5 has already been notified vide corrigen dum dated 19.5.2008. As regards the other two clauses, Ms. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel submits that tender process shall be finalized strictly in accorda nce with the rules. In view of the above, writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the Z illa Parishad shall proceed with the tender process strictly in accordance Rules . Writ petition is disposed of.