IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.69 of 2009 CHATURBHUJ SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 13/07/2009 This application has been filed against the judgment and order dated 11.5.2009 passed by Sri Alok Kumar Pandey, J. M. Ist Class, Hazipur in Complaint Case No. 1787 of 2006 whereby the opposite party nos. 2 to 6 were acquitted from the charges under sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned judgment is perverse and has not discussed the complainant’s version in detail and while passing the judgment it has unnecessarily relied upon the defence version. Perused the judgment. It appears that the trial court has considered the every aspects of the case and has come to the definite opinion that the prosecution has not been able to prove its case beyond all reasonable doubts. I see no infirmity in the impugned judgment. This application is accordingly, dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)