IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43781 of 2010 1. VIDYANAND SINGH 2. RANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ RANJEET KUMAR 3. AMARJEET KUMAR 4. RAMAWDHAR SINGH @ RAM AWDHAR 5. RAM ISHWAR SINGH @ RAM ISHAWAR @ RAMESHWAR SINGH 6. SUBEDAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. For the non-boilable offence only three of petitioners namely Ramawdhar Singh, Vidyanand Singh and Subedar Singh are specified about their giving abuse in name of caste; though land dispute is there in between the parties, but anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable for three above named petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner nos.1, 4 and 6 for anticipatory bail stand rejected. However, petitioners no.1,4 and 6 are at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order on the same day. So far, anticipatory bail petition of petitioner nos.2, 3 and 5 are concerned, they are allowed anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners no.2, 3 and 5 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with S.C. & S.T. P.S. Gaya Case No.33 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)