HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 4087 (M/S) of 2001 Old No. 26028 of 1992 R.B. Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. Lhaksar, District-Haridwar through its General Manager. ….. Petitioner. Vs 1. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh. 2. Sri Dharam Singh S/o Sri Ram Singh, Village Pipli, P.O. Laksar, District-Haridwar. ……….Respondents Sri R.K. Raizada learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri R.C. Arya learned Standing counsel for the respondent No.1. Sri Parikshit Saini learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Dated: - 11-09-2006 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri R.K. Raizada leaned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.C. Arya learned standing counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Parikshit Saini learned counsel for the respondent No.2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25/28-5-1992 passed by the respondent No.1 (Annexure No.3 to the writ petition) whereby the learned Commissioner ordered for conciliation on the basis of the application of the Workmen respondent No.2 under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The dispute is yet to be referred by appropriate Government under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act. It is pertinent to mention here that the matter relates to the territory of District –Haridwar which was part of District-Saharanpur in the erstwhile state of U.P. Therefore, the Assistant Labour Commissioner Saharanpur shall transmit the relevant record of the case to the Assistant Labour Commissioner Haridwar (State of Uttaranchal), who shall conciliate the matter and make recommendation to the appropriate Government i.e. Government of Uttaranchal for taking decision under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes, Act. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case it is provided that the ground raised in the writ petition shall be considered by the appropriate Government at the time of taking decision under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Dispute Act. With the said observation, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (B.S. Verma, J.) Dated: 11th September 2006 M.K.