IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 228 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1106 OF 2008. Manish R. Shah ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. J.B. Vashi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.S. Pednakar & Mandar Goswami, Advocates for CBI. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State. CORAM: A.S. OKA, J. DATED: 1st AUGUST 2008 P.C.: 1) Not on Board. Taken on Board. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant and the Advocate for the second Respondent. 2) My attention has been invited to the order dated 5th June 2008 passed by this Court. As per the said order, the Applicant has already furnished cash bail of Rs.2,00,000/- . In addition to that, the Applicant was directed to furnish surety. The prayer clause (a) of this Application reads thus: - 2 - (a) The Hon'ble Court may pleased to direct the Applicants to continue on cash bail of Rs.2 Lacs which is already deposited by the Applicant provisionally in lieu of surety and the said cash bail may be continued till the conclusion of the trial. 3) Learned Counsel for the first Respondent states that the first Respondent is submitting to the orders of the Court. In view of the averments made in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Application, prayer (a) deserves to be granted. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S. Oka, J)