IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 3827 of 2010 Decided on: 14th July, 2010. Yog Raj ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioners: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the State: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1, order of transfer. According to the petitioner, he has served at the present place since only last one year and prior to that he had served at Mandi for 8 years and as far as the private respondent is concerned, it is submitted that he has served only for two months in the previous station, namely, Mandi. 2. According to the learned Senior Additional Advocate General, transfer has been effected only because it is a couple case. But, the respondent could have managed by transferring the wife of the respondent, who is posted there for the last ten years to the place of her husband. 3. All these aspects the petitioner may point out before the second respondent by way of appropriate representation within two weeks, in which case the second respondent will duly consider the same by notice to the petitioner within another two weeks. Interim order will continue till orders, as above are passed. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th July, 2010(K) (Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge