IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 RP.No. 267 of 2011(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.7840/2011 Dated 22/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER M.REMESH KUMAR, S/O.T.S.MONY, AGED 44, C.I. OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, COCHIN-18. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S) 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE (HIGHER), REP. BY ITS CONVENOR, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. S.MURALEEDHARAN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPECIAL CELL, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTIONS BUREAU, ERNAKULAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011, A/W. W.P.C.NO. 7840/2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 267 of 2011 & W.P(C) No. 7840 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 31st day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T When the review petition was taken up for hearing, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition itself without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take up the matter appropriately with the respondents themselves. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take up the matter appropriately with the respondents themselves. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.