skt/- 1 1.revn.240.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 240 OF 2010 Chandrakanta @ Asha ... Applicant Vs. Dictorate of Revenue Intelligence Zonal Unit Mumbai 13 & Anr. ... Respondents ...... Mr.Vatsal Verma i/by Mr.N.P.Shukla for the applicant. Mr.Francis Saldanha, Spl. P.P. for respondent no.1-D.R.I. Smt. V.R.Bhosale, APP for respondent no.2. ...... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 21st JULY, 2010. P.C. 1 The applicant, who is an accused in R.A.No.96/2010 for the offences punishable under Section 135(1)(a) & r/w. 135(1)C of the Customs Act, 1962 with Sections 120-B, 471, 489-B, 489-C of Indian Penal Code, was granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge as per the order dated 22nd February 2010. By the said order, the applicant was tobe enlarged on bail subject to furnishing of P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount. The applicant is in jail and could not find local surety so far. Therefore, by this application, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks modification of that order, so that, it may not be necessary to furnish the local surety. The applicant is a skt/- 2 1.revn.240.10.sxw resident of Delhi. In view of this circumstances, the learned counsel for respondent no.1 has no objection to the prayer. 2 For the aforesaid reasons, the order granting bail stands modified with the effect that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R.Bond Rs.50,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. 3 The application stands disposed of. [ J.H. BHATIA, J.]