IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46333 of 2008 1. Kulbansh Paswan, son of late Mohan Paswan. 2. Saheb Paswan, son of late Mohan Paswan. 3. Shanti Devi, wife of Saheb Paswan. 4. Dadan Paswan, son of late Mohan Paswan. 5. Mantu Paswan, son of Saheb Paswan, Resident of Village- Nauhatta, Police Station-Belaon, District- Kaimur. -----Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Bihar…………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 6.2.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with complaint case no.195 of 2008 registered for offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner no.1 is the husband of the complainant, petitioner nos. 2 and 5 are brothers of the petitioner no.1, petitioner no.3 is wife of the petitioner no.2 and petitioner no.4 is nephew of petitioner no.1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire allegations in the complaint petition are false. The complainant has filed complaint case as she is opposed to the fact that the petitioner should financially support his family members. Considering these facts, the prayer for Anticipatory bail on behalf of Kulbansh Paswan, Saheb Paswan, Shanti Devi, Dadan Paswan and Mantu Paswan is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners Kulbansh Paswan, Saheb Paswan, Shanti Devi, Dadan Paswan and Mantu Paswan are directed to be released on Anticipatory bail on furnishing - 2 - bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S. D. J. M., Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Complaint Case No. 195 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Mridula Mishra,J)