IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2011 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24130 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- AYISHA BEEVI, W/O.KASIM KUNJU, AGED 66 YEARS, PALLITHEKKATHIL VEEDU, MAMKONAM, CHERIYA VELINALLOOR, VELINALLOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM SRI.V.P.PRASANTH RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT, OFFICE OF S P, KOLLAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EZHUKONE CIRCLE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOYAPALLY POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT 4. K.G.VISHWANATHAN, (CONVENER INTUC) VISHAW NIVAS, KALAVAYAL, OYOOR P.O., PIN 691510, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. S.NASAR, MADATHILVEEDU, ROADVILA, CHEIYAVELINALLOOR P.O., KARINGANNOOR VIA, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.(CONVENER CITU) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24130 of 2010(M) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------ EXT.P1. COPY OF THE TAX PAID RECEIPT DATED 7.4.2010. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 12.7.2010 EXT.P3. COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPODENT DATED 12.7.2010. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 28.9.2010 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------ / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK R.BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 24130 OF 2010 M ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th March, 2011. JUDGMENT Basant, J. This petition filed as early as on 2-8-2010 remains without disposal even now. The matter came up for hearing last on 27-10-2010. There is no representation for the petitioner or the respondents. Inference appears to be irresistible that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. 2. This petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. R.BASANT Judge K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj 2