c^ 8ENCH. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (C)No. -^ ^ /2010 Petitioner -4» Dinesh Kumar, S/o Late Shri Muneshwar Prasad, aged 28 years, Occupation- Cultivation, R/o Village- Singi Bahar, P.0 Sing Bahar, P.S- Tapkara, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh Versus Respondents ^ \^y ^M^! Asv.-^yv" . .A^ ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Home Department D.K.S Bhawan, .Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^" 2. The Commissioner, Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh ^- 3. The Collector, Jashpur, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ^^' 4. Superintendent of Police, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ^' 5. Sub-Divisional Officer, Revenue, Kunkuri, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6. The Tahsildar, Farsabahar, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh . ^u--" 7. Station House Officer, P.S Tapkara, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 8. Gram Panchayat, Upparkachar, Block- Farsabahar, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ^ ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC. XI-HC-22 ^ST ^|<41dzi. y-dl^4!^ ^^l^y 31T^?T^i^ ...^..•.£.t..^J..^.:.2i%^/('0 ^...-..v...........^..............^ ^ MW^{ 9h^l<=h •^R^ST' ^TT^T'^I [<yli<=h 3TI^T 5t)^icb ^rficf 317^1'^TT^R'HftU SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan S 25°04-2Q11 Shri Sameer Shrivastava, couns^ Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawye! cbl^l?d<lflr1 im^ff ^ ftT^ i^l^K ^T ^Tf^FT 37T^?T hrivastava, J. ^l for the petitioner. r for the State/respondents 1 to7. This petition has been filed by |:he petitioner praying for issuance of direction t6 respondents to provide ad|quate security for estabiishing stone crusher on the Govemment iand iea^i deterrent action against the persort; Government scheme to promote smaii ^oale industr^. Learned counsei for the petition^r submits that the petitioner is a victim of certain antisociai elements, who ar^ criminal activities prohibiting the petiti<) stone crushing machine on the Governlment iand ieased out to the petitloner for the purposes. He submits that on g|)etitioner having made ropresentation. the Commissioner vide his memo date of the petition), directed the Coliector ed out to the petitioner and to take ss, who are causing hindrance, in creating obstructions and invoived in ner from proceeding to estabiish his ^ 4/11/2010 (Annexure P/10, page 62 to provide security to the petitioner. However, the petiiioner is suffering crihiinai activities and no protection has been provided by the administration an<(i the poiice. On the other hand, iearned Stafr the petitioner had iodged report aliegii has been duiy investigated. He subrjdits that on a report lodged by the petitioner on 11/6/2010 in poiice stati & counsei submitted that as ana when ^g commission of offence, the matter on - Tapkara, offence against eight persons have been registered for ajieged commission of offence under Section 147, 427 and 506 of iPC. A^er investigation, a charge sheet has been filed against those persons in th^ Court of iaw on 9/12/10. He further submits that the administration and th^ poiiee is committed to the protection of residents of the area and the com^iaints made by the petitioner would i '^- ^m ^B^^ y '%. ^^'.J XI-HC-22 S^-.A" ^~s[ r^ii<liid4, ^nl^^Ko, fN^iray srr^r ^^ K).f.^)^o.'^-^/ f-0 -^ 2fk HW^{ $b^|cb 1^^T* W^T^T f^rii<=h 3TI^T ^TW^Tf^ Deepti ^T^F'^IT^R ^Tftn ^- <=bl^(<n4lr1 TITR^Tf ^ fe^t <p3i<^l< '^3Tf^TR 3TT^T be duiy considered by the competent ^uthorities and action wouid be taken in accordance with iaw. In view of the submission^ hereinabove, the petition is finaiiy disc^sed made by iearned State counsei off. __- Sd/- ManindraMohanSbriv.Btava Jude "^tR^