IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 14434 of 2004 Between: 1 Syeeda Fatima W/o. Saleem Ghouse R/o. 22-4-220,Kotla Alijah Hyderabad. 2 Saleem Fatima S/o. Gulam Ghouse R/o. 22-4-220,Kotla Alijah Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Registrar of Cooperative Societies City Circle, Hyderabad. 2 The District Cooperative Officer Hyderabad (Urban) District. 3 The Chairman, Prudential Cooperative Bank Limited 8-1-381, R.P.Road, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to E.P. No.14/2003 Ct as also LF No.57/190, dt.14.7.2004 and upon perusal of the same be pleased to quash and set aside the Notice of Sale of immovable property issued under Rule 52 (11) (e) in Form No.8 bearing LF No.H.57/190 dt.14.7.2004 in the interest of justice and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MILIND G GOKHALE Counsel for the Respondent : MR.S.ASHOK ANAND KUMAR FOR R3 GP FOR COOPERATION FOR R1&2 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 14434 of 2004 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the order of sale notice of immovable properties issued by the second respondent daTed 14.7.2004 as illegal . It is represented by the counsel that during the pendency of the writ petition, as per the decision of the Division Bench of this Court, the petitioner made a representation to the second respondent for settlement under One Time Settlement scheme (for short OTS) and in pursuance of the same, a settlement was arrived at and the petitioner is paying the amounts in terms of the said settlement. In view of the settlement of the matter under the One Time Settlement scheme, no cause of action survives. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infrucutuous. No costs. ______________ G.YETHIRAJULU,J DATE: 26.2.2008 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL} THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 14434 of 2004 Date: 26.2.2008