THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.22154 OF 2007 O R D E R Heard both the counsel. 2. The case of the petitioners as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is that the respondent – A.P. Foods, Nacharam, has engaged them during the year 1982 as casual labour and they have completed 240 working days and that during the year 1991, the respondent – A.P. Foods, has engaged about 200 casual labour, but terminated the services of the petitioner orally on 21.3.1991. The further case of the petitioners is that during the termination, the respondents have regularized about 180 workmen. Similarly situated casual labour, whose cases were not considered for regularization, filed writ petition before this court in W.P.No.9043/1989 and this court directed the respondents to consider their cases on par with their juniors. The further case of the petitioners is that presently there are clearly vacancies in the 2nd respondent – A.P. Foods and as they belong to back ward class category, their cases may be considered. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents by disengaging their services, have taken new persons on casual basis and though they made several representations, their cases were not being considered. 3. No counter affidavit is filed. 4. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider the case of the petitioners for engagement on casual basis, depending on the availability of work, in accordance with law. No costs. AVS ---------------------------- 15—06—2011