IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 13801 of 2008 Between: 1 P. Atchamma W/o. Late P. Vengal Rao R/o. 16-2-836/3, Madhava Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2 P. Srinivas S/o. Late P. Vengal Rao R/o. 16-2-836/3, Madhava Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 3 P. Sridhar S/o. Late P. Vengal Rao R/o. 16-2-836/3, Madhava Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 4 P. Subba Rao S/o. Late P. Vengal Rao R/o. 16-2-836/3, Madhava Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 5 P. Surya Prakash S/o. Late P. Vengal Rao R/o. 16-2-836/3, Madhava Nagar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its District Collector Ranga Reddy District. 3 A.P. Wakf Board, Hyderabad, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer 4 Syed Shafiullah Hussaini S/o. Syed Shah Akber Hussaini R/o. 3-25, Dargah Hussain Shah Wali (V), Serilingampalli Mandal, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Orders by declaring the Errata Notification F.No.M1/69/PROT/RR/04 dated 13.03.2006 published in the A.P. Gazette No.14 dated 06.04.2006 as illegal, arbitrary, violating the procedure prescribed under the Wakf Act, 1995, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.A.ANASUYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.13801 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 15.07.2008. KSR / VGSR