IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 22.11.2010 C.R.No.7160 of 2010 (O&M) Narinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Varinder Pal Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by the learned trial Court on 27.03.2010, whereby the learned trial Court has directed the mother to bring the child in proper way, so that the personality of the child is not effected in future in a petition for custody of the child namely Manreet Kaur, aged about 6 years. The learned trial Court passed an order on 14.02.2008, whereby the petitioner was allowed to meet the minor for at least 2 hours twice a month at a place to be mutually decided by the parties. It was also ordered that in case the parties fail to decide the place mutually, the mother shall produce the child on every 2nd and last Saturday in Court between 2.00PM to 4.00 PM to enable the petitioner to meet the child. It is in pursuance of the liberty granted, the child was produced in the Court, which led to the order impugned in the present revision petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that the child is tutored and she does not like to meet her father. C.R.No.7160 of 2010 (O&M) The order passed by the learned trial Court on 27.03.2010 is purely interlocutory order. It does not decide any of the rights of the parties. The petitioner has been granted interim right to meet the child, which right has not been curtailed in any manner. Therefore, I do not find any ground for interference in the order passed by the learned trial Court in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 22.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2