IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 510 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 5.2.2002 in WP NO : 25486 OF 2001 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M.Ramana Murthy, S/o. Bangaraiah, R/o. Puritipenta Village, Gajapathinagaram Mandal, Vizianagaram District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 A.Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, R/o. Gajapathinagaram, Licence of M/s. Sri Lakshmi Wines, Vizianagarma District. 2 The Government of A.P, Revenue ( Excise-III ) Department, Rep by its Officer on Special Duty, Secretariat,Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 4 The Prohibition and Excise Superintedent, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.RAMALINGESWARA REDDY The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the cause in the Writ Appeal does not survive and the Writ Appeal has become infrcutuous. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar June 8, 2009 MAS.