IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18299 of 2010 1. SUDHAKAR SHUKLA S/O PUNYADEV SHUKLA R/O VILL.- JITWARPUR, P.S.- GOVINDGANJ, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN, AT PRESENT POSTED & WORKING AS LECTURER (JYOTISH), AT BRAHAMDEO MUNI UDASEEN SANSKRIT COLLEGE, HAZIPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE KAMESWAR SINGH DARBHANGA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY KAMSHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR KAMESHWAR SINGH DARBHANGA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 4. THE REGISTRAR, KAMESHWAR SINGH DARBHANGA SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, KAMESWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 5. THE PRINCIPAL, BRAHAMDEO MUNI UDASEEN SANSKRIT COLLEGE, HAZIPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI ----------- 02. 19.5.2011 A detailed order laying down the parameters of consideration was indicated in CWJC No. 9773 of 2001, disposed of on 12.11.2009, contained in Anneuxre-16. Annexure-1 is the outcome of such a direction. The Court is restrained to record that the Registrar or the Vice-Chancellor of the University do not understand the basic directions issued by this Court in this regard because if they had, a cryptic or vague kind of order contained in Annexure-1 would not have been passed. Reading of the said order does not indicate the reasons for rejecting the claim of the petitioner. In the above stated background, the Court has no option but to quash Annexure-1 with a direction upon the 2 respondent University authorities especially the Vice- Chancellor/Acting Vice-Chancellor to pass a fresh speaking order within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order. Writ is allowed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)