IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1753 of 2008 BHONU SINGH @ VIJAY PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 06.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and also under section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the First Information Report the petitioner is said to have arrived at the door of the informant and enquired about him. The mother of the informant denied his presence. It has further been stated that as soon as the mother of the informant came to the door fire was resorted to by the petitioner and eight others in which the mother of the petitioner sustained injury on left arm. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation the witnesses including the brother of the informant as well as the father of the informant have stated that the occurrence had taken place not at the door of the informant but at the different place i.e. Chauria pool and Brick kiln. It has further been submitted that these witnesses are not specific about the allegation of firing shot by the petitioner which ultimately hit the mother of the informant . Referring to the statement of the witnesses it has been submitted that in fact there was firing from both sides. It has further been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2007 2 In the facts and circumstances,let the petitioner namely, Bhonu Singh @ Vijay Prasad be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/-( ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui P.S.Case No. 221 of 2007 subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be the own family member of the petitioner. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)