C.W.P. No. 1627 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1627 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 23.08.2011 Jasbir Singh and another ..........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Ms. Sukhwinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is for considering their case for promotion to the post of Lab Attendant in the pay scale of ` 3120-5160/- (unrevised). Notice of motion was issued on 2.2.2009. In response thereto, separate replies on behalf respondent No.1 and respondents No.2 to 4 have already been filed and the same are on record. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that there were two different channels for promotion and the case of the petitioners does not fall in the category for promotion to the post of Lab Attendant. He further submits that the case of the petitioners has been considered by the C.W.P. No. 1627 of 2009 (2) Committee, which was constituted for that purpose only and the petitioners have been promoted to the post of Helper, which is also equivalent post and pay scale is also same. He has also shown promotion order dated 8.9.2010, which is taken on record. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. In case, the petitioners are aggrieved by any action of the respondents, they are at liberty to raise their grievance in accordance with law. August 23, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE