r !ci HLGU5&U8T QFCHHATT1SGARH AT BJLASPUR W.P.(S) No. 3165 of 2007 PsStioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Ku. Sandhya Chudhary, D/o R.P.Choudhary (Smt. Sandhya Choudhsry ?A'/o Shri Hemant Kumar S'mgaF®), aged abwA 46 years, Occupation - Service, Assi'stanf Professor (Politicai Science), Govemment Coliege, Shankar Nsgar Raipur, Distt. Rajpur (C.G.). Stete of ChhatBsgarh, Through Secretary, Higher Educatwnat Department, D.K.S. Bhawn, Mantoaiay, Raipur (C.G). Commissibner Hfgher Educafl'on, Dirsctorate Government Scisnce Coitege Campus, Raipur (C.G.). Princips? Govt. Qiris Coltege, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Secretaiy GenwaS Admmis^ation, Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantratay, Raipur (C.G.) WRiT PETITiON UNDER ARTiCLE 22S QF THE CONSTSTUTiON OF mDSA SB: Hon'bie Ju'stice Satish K, Agnihofri Shri S. N. Nande^ Advocate for e petitksner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lav/yer for the rsspondente. ORDER (Passed on ttis 1^h day of Jun®,2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the pefitioner submits ftat fte petffioner vras initia!ly appointed as Assistant Professor on ad hoc basis vide order dated 31 .1.1986 ^nnexurs P/6) and theresfter vide wdw dated 27*^ Nofembar, 1995 (Annexure P?8) the probation period ofthe petitioner were put to sn end v/ith w.e.f. 17.S.1989 and herssnnces wers rsgufarized. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petiBoner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grsnf of annua! sncrements in view of the uctiuM-TNnm' Iklwffitr c f : ! SSG Thakur Circuiar No. 138/621«2Afl-1/fourBhopai, dated 18th August, 1993, issued by the Finance Department, Govemment of Madhya Pradesh. !n view of Sie said circular. ths ps onsr seete permission of this Court te make a repressntation before Shs concemed authorifiss for grant of snnual increments, to which teamed counse! appearing fw the respondents/State has RO objecSon. 3. In the evsrrt, a rapressntstion is made, fte respondent-authoriSss may consider fte sams, in accordance w !aw, on its own msnt, •A'ithin a psriod of eisht wseks froir, fte recsipt of the rspresentation, ifany. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated libsrty. No order as to costs. ; Sd/- ' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge