IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3045 of 1998 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3272 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NARESHBHAI NEVJIBHAI GANVIT Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DP VORA for Petitioners MR HASMUKH PATEL for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 11/05/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners were appointed on ad-hoc basis as lecturers in the subject History, Sanskrit and Economics respectively and they have been posted in Arts and Commerce College, Khergam, Chikli, Dist. Bulsar. Having the apprehension of termination of their services they filed this special civil application No.3045/98 in this court, which was admitted on 18/4/98 and they have been protected. This special civil application is squarely covered by the decision of this court given in the special civil application No.7353/97 today. 3. The special civil application and rule are disposed in the terms that the interim relief, which has been granted by this court on 18/4/98 shall continue till the regular selections are made on the post of lecturers by G.P.S.C., However, it is made clear that in case the petitioners are not selected for the post then it is open to the respondents to terminate their services without waiting for the posting of the selected candidate on the post. In all eventuality otherwise also the petitioner cannot have any right to continue on the post in the case where they are not selected and/or on appointment and posting of selected candidate in their place. 4. In view of this decision in the special civil application No.3045/98 nothing now substantially survives in the special civil application No.3272/99 and the same is dismissed. (S.K.Keshote, J.) *Pvv