IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.475 of 2010 RAMESH SINGH, S/O LATE JAGDISH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 18.01.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 364, 406, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It has been submitted that in the complaint it has been stated that on 23rd April, 2006 the petitioner had forcibly taken away the brother of the complainant so that certain loan would be repaid by labour of the brother. But this report was made only 31.12.2008 more than two years later and suggests that the case has been belatedly filed only because the complainant wanted to misappropriate the loan amount given by the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above mentioned fact, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 02.09.2009 and has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 109 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner 2 who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J)