<D ....-€'' C^? t^ BEFORETHEHON'BLEHlGHCOURTOFCHHATnSGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 46 ? ^ /2009 PETITIONER ..»••'1^\')<; ^••;^'...-:-" RESPONDENTS ..^^^ ei^^ 'yi^s-<^^ . ' ^a/ Ram Narayrt»Tanday S/o Mohana Tanday, Aged about54 years, Working as Lecturer R/o C/o Govt. High School Kachhe, District Kanker, C.G. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development,Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, yC.G. 2. District Edueation officer Kanker District North Bastar(Kanker) , C.G. 3. ' Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, KankeFDistrict North Bastar (Kanker), C.G. 4. District Treasury Officer, Treasury Kanker District North Bastar (Kanker), C.G. WRrT PETITION UNDER ARTICl.E 226 OF GONSTITUTION OF INDIA The above named Detitionerb_eastosubmitas under:- mGIlCOUKTOEEHHAT'nseAKitATEILASPUR PETmQNER WRrTPfiTIEIQNfSfcNo. 6678 trf2009 RanNarayan Tanday. RESPONDENTS VERSUS :....,,:. State afCaihattis^rh & 3 OAera. WRITIIETn'IQ XJNDERAR3aCia22frC»HI&GGNSTITUrK)N^Q^^^ 1SB:Hon^t»teShnSatiihK.Aattih«>^J;'; "^ "•• ••"" •- Present: 2. 3. Sl®Sa^eMdra Sa^,A4BO!;;afej ti»pettt^^ >, Shri N|Roy,Pati^tawyeribr1feStMe/respond^& ORE^t^ORALl '^\ ' ^^ssed <m 16 |1^ of November;^2^ : Withthe eonsentofleamedcounirelappeanagtelliepartie^^^ lfiiially.:,.._,l.''s-'y:- ' .-;'-^. .::•': ;''^/ 1 : •' :fc:ft: 1'' :'''i:'li; Leanied counset appearing for Ae petituniot subinits'[<tiMt dte iietitotCT ww appointed. inifiaMy (m a fixed pay s(:afe <n pro1»^0 .;Aftea'?oom^etion <if probation;'pa'ii^^:t& petitiofe was gianted.Tegular i^;Scal^i£ea^^ &rther^ubmitefhat^is^uivoh^Intlwcasei8astor^^ entitled to regular pay se^e wifltefi^ fi^the.dafe^ afteT:coHipI?tjmiiofprobation.periogl.^' ;.,.... ,^\ ^:.. , ;,:g'-:ai ..^ , •1 ;^,';.,...:-'',' ; The issue ^iivolveB herem^was" considei^^^^^^ tl^ Madhya, Prad^ St^ Adnumstratf^3M1wnal,3)'abaIpur ybr short "te fflT") in Q.|L: KZ745/89 ^adhfMntTc^and 56othwsvs. Statev^M.K ^vthw^,^Stigs^}tw that the.sunilarl^ situatedteachers are entitled-to regular gayaeiate ^.e^ the'Aate ofuutial[?appomfanent The matter was taken q> to the S<yreii ;C(n*rt. ll^appeat was dismissed^feythe Supreme Court, upholdiiig fc deeision offfie Triliiuiatito the effeet that the Teaehers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay seale firom date ofiriitial appourtmenL In view ofthe aBove submissions^nade by leamed counsel'for Ihe parties, tiie writ petition is disposed ofin the sam®tenns i.e., the petttiorteris grantediU^erty to make a representatian, ifsoadvised, to considerhts ease 6n itswn^metitaMEtin: itsperspectrve.Iftiiepetitionerstaiulsonthesamefbotingsaspercwderipassedfcy fhe SAT inAfa«?A2<fe»nfR»<&(supra) and subsequently confinned bytte Suineiu Conrt in Special I^eave Petitioa (Civil) Nb. 6892% by (nder dated 3-1-1994, the petitioneriDaylieentitledtosamereIiefaecardingly. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge L.