/ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) o.^ M.C.C.NQ 12007 APPLICANT NON-APPLICANTS. ^ ^n <^>/ ^\¥' ^¥3' y / ^? \^ / y x /^ /" ^- ^f {'9- '%, ,»Ai (F.A.NO. 07/2007) ^ Kali Ram S/o. Shri Bihari Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o. village Giroud, P.H. No. 73,'Magar Lod Up Tahsil Magarlod, District Dhamtari VERSUS Bihari, aged about 70 years, S/o. Latel Sau Padum aged about 27 years, son of Bihari Sahu, Laxmi Bai, aged about 30 years, D/o. Bihari Sahu Parbhouti Bai, aged about 25 years, D/o. Bihari Sahu, /• ^- 3. ^" -4. ../' 5. Binda Bai, W/o. Padum Sahu, All are resident of village Giroud, Patwari Halka No. 73, Magarlod, Up Tahsil Magarlod, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) -6. State of Chhattisgarh through - the CoUector, Dhamtari (CG) rII ^V3N,' | :£:K/APPUCATION FOR RE^TORATION OF F.A. N0. 07^2007_ XI-HC-22 ^ET^I^lQl^, ^Tf1<111<o, fadl^y 311^1 M5|ch —.^:.C..C:.M0^^ ^Wf{\ sb^l* """r'"---"""y^ 200; ¥^R^' 3T1^T^FT ^CT^sn^r $b^icb^Tf?cT (^- ^. )„< ^{^t<^ v^- 3Tf^T ^RTTW ^rf^T 25/01/2007 : Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel fj^r the applicant Shri Akhil Agrawal, PanelLa^ Heard. Aggrievetf by the judgment ^ Suit No. 30-A/2004, the petitioner Registry had pointed out defaults re| Fees. Since this default was not Court on 12-12-2006'for orders on ^ appeliant sought two weeks time to| prayed for, it v,/as directed that stipulated period this appeai shall reference to the Bench. Since the a stipulated period this appeal was dis Ghi^f<n41Ti ^i*4<nT^ te^ <RI<^I< ^3Tl:^T3T1^T vyer for the State/respondent No.6. l-id decree dated 27-09-2005 passed in Civil lerein filed an appeal on 18-11-2005. The |ating to valuation of appeal and deficit Court ^emoved, this matter was listed before this lefault. On that date learned counse! for the |remove the default. Whiie granting time as the default was not removed within the be liable to be dismissed without further |)peilant did not remove the default within the hnissedon 08-01-2007. Learned counsel for the ap^eflant has filed this appiication (M.C.C. No.; 34/2007) for restoration on the groi counsel the deftcit Court Fees cou applicant prays that for the bonafide Lind that due to in-advertant mistake of the |d not be pajd and the valuation of appeal could not be corrected within the ^tipulated period. Learned counsel for the mistake of the counsel, the appeiiant shou!dj not be made to suffer. Considering the grounds m^itioned in the application, it is directed that on deposit of cost of Rs.500/- with jthe High Court Legal Aid Committee, on or before 29-01-2007, the ihterim ordei| passed on 08-01-2007 shali be recalled. It is further directed that the appeilant the same day. No further time shal! bje granted thereafter for that purpose In vie'vv of above, M.C.C. No. shaii thereafter also remove the defaults on p4/2007 stands disposed of Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge - - " 'T^y^) '