IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1256 (SS) of 2011 Rajesh Kumar Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel present for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The writ petition is totally devoid of merit as the petitioner has filed present writ petition to protect his transfer from place “A” to place “B” within the same district, which he only apprehends and no orders have been passed as yet. No interference can be made in the writ petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate procedure including a representation to the authority concerned in case such transfer is made. The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 19.09.2011 VKG