IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10366 of 2008 Between: 1. Smt.Veeramreddy Venkata Lakshmi W/o.late Kasi Viswanatha Rao R/o.D.No.65-529, Meher Nagar Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2. Veeramreddy Venkatachalam S/o.late Kasi Viswanatha Rao R/o.D.No.65-529, Meher Nagar Kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, East Godavari District at Kakinada. 3 The Land Acquisition Officer, East Godavari District at Kakinada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not considering the objections raised by the petitioner under Section 5-A of Land Acquisition Act as illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the objections filed by the petitioner dated 10.3.2008 and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.PULIPATI RADHIKA Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.10366 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: Ms. P. Radhika, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ C.V. Ramulu, J 19.3.2009. bnr