IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4403 of 2009 Date of Decision: July 08, 2010 Gurdev Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 5. None for respondent No.6. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing chargesheet dated 27.1.2009 (Annexure P-8). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that during the pendency of the petition, chargesheet (Annexure P-8) has been withdrawn. Period of service spent by the C.W.P. No.4403 of 2009 [2] petitioner under suspension has been ordered to be treated as period spent on duty, and therefore, the matter has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that retiral benefits have not been released and the arrears on account of period spent on suspension have not been calculated. 4. The respondents are directed to release the retiral benefits after calculating the claim of the petitioner within a period of four months on receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. The petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous however with directions as given above. (AJAI LAMBA) July 08, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?