IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 20348 of 2008(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.P.RAVEENDRAN, MELAPPUNATHIL HOUSE PAVANDOOR, NANMINDA. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.20348/2008-V: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE R.1. REJECTING THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 17/11/2007. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE MODIFICATION SUGGESTED BY THE PETITIONER AVOIDING THE OBJECTION PORTION BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 14/12/2007. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE S.T.A.T., ERNAKULAM IN M.V.A.A. NO. 69/2008 DTD. 12/02/2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 20348 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner's application for regular permit on the route Narikkuni-Koyilandy was considered and rejected by the first respondent on the ground that a portion of the route overlaps the notified sector. The petitioner then submitted an application for modification of the route avoiding the notified scheme altogether. At the same time Ext.P1 order was challenged in a statutory appeal before the STAT. The same was disposed of as per Ext.P3 requiring the RTA to consider the request of the petitioner for the modified route avoiding objectionable overlapping. Ext.P3 judgment is dated 12.2.2008. The petitioner is aggrieved that further orders have not been passed by the RTA in respect of the direction in Ext.P3 judgment. Hence this writ petition. WPC.20348 /2008 2 2. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the petitioners request for permit as per the modification suggested as per Ext.P2 shall be considered by the RTA in the next meeting and a decision shall be taken in this regard. The submission is recorded. The writ petition is disposed of as above. V. GIRI, JUDGE. pmn/ WPC.20348 /2008 3