1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ARBITRATION) No. 906/2010. M/s. Laxmi Construction Company -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 17.06.2011. Heard Shri A.R. Wagh, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mrs. K.S. Joshi, learned A.G.P. for non-applicants. As per the alleged arbitration clause, there is an appeal provided, firstly before the Chief Engineer and thereafter before the State Government. According to the non-applicants, such appeal before the State Government is still pending. According to Shri Wagh, the learned Counsel for applicant, only a 2 representation has been sent to the State Government and it is pending since long without any action. As the representation has been made to the authority which is envisaged as Appellate Authority in the said clause, I find the proceedings as filed, premature. The respondent no.1 shall decide that representation as an appeal, as early as possible and in any case within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order, after hearing the present applicant. Liberty to applicant to approach again, if cause of action arises thereafter. Misc. Civil Application is disposed of with above directions, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd