IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.835 of 2011 KAMAL RAI @ KAMLU RAI @ HANUMAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 11.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 7.8.2010 in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 269/2009 registered under section 392 of the IPC. Though one Kamlu Singh @ Kamal Singh has been named in the fardbeyan of the informant but name of the aforesaid person did not appear in the formal first information report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of this petitioner came in the confessional statement of co-accused Guddu and apart from the aforesaid material, there is nothing against this petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is in jail custody since long and up till now he has not been put on TI Parade and having more or less similar allegation some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail by this court. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances, petitioner Kamal Rai @ Kamlu Rai @ Hanuman Rai is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 269 of 2009. It is made clear that the conditions imposed upon co- - 2 - accused Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Sah @ Arjun Kumar by order dated 1.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no.10339/2010 shall apply to the petitioner also. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)