IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.762 of 2010. Decided on: March 25, 2010 Vinod Kumar ….. Petitioner. Versus State of HP and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. G.R. Palsara, Advocate for respondent No.3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1 order of transfer. Though it is styled as transfer on request- mutual basis, according to the petitioner he has not made any request. This is certainly a serious issue. The second respondent should consider it. We find that several cases with such complaints where the incumbents are transferred on the basis of request – mutual request, where in fact they are totally unaware of any such request. The petitioner may file a representation before the second respondent within a period of one week from today. In the event of the petitioner filing an appropriate representation, the second respondent shall duly consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance 2 with law within a period of another two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Interim order dt.12/3/2010 will continue such time. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application. Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 25, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.