-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 43 OF 2008 Nagesh Anirudha Mishra ).. Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai ) and others ).. Respondents Mr. J.B. Chinoy a/w. Mr. Sanjay Jain i/b. Zohair & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Doctor i/b. M/s. B. Munim & Co. for Respondent No.7. Mr. S.S. Pakale a/w Mr.Parag Vyas for Union of India. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader, for the State. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare a/w Mrs. P.A. Purandare for BMC. Mr. Aspi Chinoy a/w Mr. V.R. Dhond for Respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & V.M . KANADE, J. DATE: JUNE, 05, 2008. P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties for some time. In our considered view, this Writ Petition is premature and thus does not call for interference by the Court at this stage. We do expect that certain averments made in the Writ Petition, if factually -2- correct, may have some bearing on the matters in issue. But as we have already noticed that we are not willing to go into the merits or otherwise of the contentions raised before us, we do hope that the Corporation shall place all these material before the concerned Authority which is considering award of the tender, who in its wisdom, may have to apply its mind to the aspects of the matter. However, these averments in the Writ Petition are disputed by the Corporation as well as the Respondents and Union of India also. 2. Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.