IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39014 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Maqsud @ Maqsood Alam .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 2 23-11-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The accusation is of illegal consumption of the electricity. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he was the bona fide consumer and his electricity connection was disconnected and for restoration of the same, he submitted the application also but in the meanwhile frivolous case was lodged. Though, the loss has been calculated to the tune of Rs. 43,77,888/-. At present, the petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 50,000/- within a period of three months before the learned court below which will be invested in some fix deposit scheme in connection with present case which will be subject to the result of the case. Let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Magadh Area, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 158/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. On the date of furnishing the bail bond, the petitioner must deposit Rs. 20,000/- out of Rs. 50,000/- when the bail bond of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted which will be finally accepted on deposit of the total amount. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)