IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19657 of 2009 1. DEEPAK KUMAR 2. SANJEEV KUMAR ----- PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 03. 22.06.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners is present. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Both the petitioners have approached this court for grant of regular bail in a case instituted under Section 394 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., which was lodged against unknown, the informant was relieved of his motorcycle at gun point. It appears that subsequently, the looted motor cycle was found in possession of the petitioners who were involved in another case being Pupri P.S. Case No. 02/2009. It is submitted that except the aforesaid two cases the petitioners are not required in any other case. It is further contended that they are in custody in connection with the present case since 18.02.2009. Having considered the submissions and after going through the record, this court, for the present, is not inclined to admit them to bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. However, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after six months. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal,J.)