IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6106 of 2008 Ram Dayal Sah, S/o Fakirchand Sah, resident of Village Shekhpur Sahrol, P.O. Kaunaila, District Samastipur………………………….…….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur. 7. The Block Education Officer, Ujiarpur, Samastipur. 8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dalsing Sarai, Samastipur. 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Chandchaur East. 10. The Secretary, Bihar Secondary School Examination Board, Patna. 11. The Abhinav Kumar Thakur, Panchayat Teacher, Utkramit Middle School, Janakpur Panchayat Chand Chaur East, Block Ujiarpur, Samastipur……………………………………………..…………Respondents ----------- 2 26.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner challenges the appointment of respondent no.11 as Shiksha Mitra made in 2004 on the ground that he was appointed on forged certificate. There is nothing on record to show that petitioner filed any complaint in time before any authority. A typed copy of undated representation of the petitioner is 2 annexed as Annexure-3 which does not inspire confidence. In the circumstances, apparently, petitioner has moved this Court directly without approaching the authorities of the Government in time. Hence, the writ application is dismissed. However, this does not debar respondents from making any enquiry with regard to appointment of respondent no.11, since if it is found that appointment is obtained by fraud and misrepresentation on the part of a candidate, that becomes void ab initio. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)