IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 7751 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.4.2010. Ram Lal --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved of his transfer vide order dated 27.4.2010, whereby he has been transferred from Faridabad to Chandigarh. The ground for challenging the impugned order is that the petitioner is to retire on 31.3.2011 and under the Govt. Policy transfer of an employee within one year of his retirement is not permissible. Without entering into the merits of this controversy, this petition is disposed of with the following directions:- 1. The petitioner shall make a representation to the competent authority within one week. 2. The representation made by the petitioner shall be decided within a period of two weeks. Till the time representation of the petitioner is decided, the impugned order shall not be implemented. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 30.4.2010. lucky