IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 6980 of 2007 Between: Shaik Osman S/o Shaik Abbas Ali R/o No. 18-12-419/A, Hafeez Baba Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND Jalpally Gram Panchayat, repby its Sarpanch, Jalpally Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in proposing to construct the Water tank in the petitioner's plots bearing Nos. 104 and 105 situated in Sy. No. 78 of Jalpalli Village, hayathnagar mandal, Ranga Reddy District without any authority or right, as as illegal, arbitrary, improper and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent herein not to interfere or in any manner proceed with the construction work in the above said plots, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court, deems ﬁt and proper inthe circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.LAYEEQ KHAN Counsel for the Respondent: MR.G.ELISHA The Court made the following ORDER: The writ petition was listed for hearing on 11.09.2008. Since there was no representation for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation. The proceeding sheet discloses that on an earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner. Further, the relief claimed in the writ petition is about the proposed construction of a water tank in plot Nos.104 and 105 in survey No.78 of Jalpalli Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Though the writ petition was ﬁled in April 2007, there was no interim order. By all means, the construction may have been completed. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for default. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 12.09.2008. kdl