.^vw g Ea, y y~ fi I 1 IT IVISI *]^»'A..^f^ :*^ t-t iiyuyt E ito Chhattisaarh. O'-.'*-»'r-*"^*^' OCi^ic;tcti y, 1'BLE SHRi RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRS SUNIL KUMAR SINKA. J. 1. Chhattisaarh Electricity Board, .CllpLft 2. Superlntendlna Engineer Sancha!sn Avam Surskssh] Chhattisaarh Electricitv Board, JSQOQEpUf ^iiCiS, L/tiflslLtSQam. \r Accounts Officei /^ !-,t,.o^:~^—-s~ \^i iii<aii!S'yat s j Electricity ^^^^1 'uciiu, Gudhivari, RaiDur.Chhattisaarh. P. Survanaravan Aver, Son of K.P. A It/^>" f^.iw^.,,-4 ^iit^/k* ?+ ^f^ i^'^.nir^* /^lff»<H'-A r\ty^i, ciyteu ciLfuUL -tu ycffliS; 'kw/sssk/t? Asslstant, Grade-il, R/o Viidyut 'vlanda! Coiony, Gudhiyari, Ralpur, Cnhattisgarh DER SECTEON 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FQR RECALL OF ORDER IONOFS.A. Present : snn A&hisheK Sinna, counsel tor tne petitioners. The followina order of (23'°September, 2008) the Court was passed by l» ^••ll^B Learned counsel Tor the petitsoners is heard on MCP No.1971/2003, a Detitlon for condonation of deiay in filing the restoration petitlon. 2) On due consideration, we are satisfied that the petitioners ^ have succeeded in showing sufficlent cause for the delav in filina the restoration petition. 3) MCP No.1971/2003, therefore, Is allowed and ths detay in filina the restoration petition Is herebv condoned. Learned counsei tbr the petitioners is heard Liie restoration Detition. oaama 51 T'lhe petitioners are seekina restoration o? Second ADDea! No.407/2001, which came to be dismissed on account of non- compiiance of the order dated 03.05.2002. 6) On due consideration, MCC No.166/2003 is allowed and Second Appeal No.407/2001 Is restored to its oriainal number. 7) With the above order. 1A No.8603/2004 also stands dlsposed of. Sd/'- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge