*>ifl|it Biiw; 'fc ai'Sf IN THE HIGH COURT OF .JUDICATURE OF CffiATTISGARH AT BILASPDR WRIT PETITON N0. -foS& 2004, PETITIONER:- ^sssW f7.^ Arvind Kumar Tandon S/o- P.R. Tandon Retire Patwari Aged about 23 years P.0.- Singa, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) ^/y ' ^ >^" VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ^s^ 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Panchayat & Social welfare Department Mantralya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Director, Panchayat & Soclal Welfare Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF !NDIA_ FOR ISSUENCE OP WRIT IN_JiATURJE_OP __CERTIT!QRARY MANDAMUS _PROHJBIH L AND OTHER SUITABLE VRIT OR WRITS DIERECTION OR DIRERCTIONS ORDER OR OKDERS, ! -i^QSI^gi t^r^^T'l ^?- HTOH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BHASPUR SINGLEBBNCH : HON'BLB SHRI SATI8H K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION KO. 4030 of 2004 Petitioner Respondents Versus Arviud KuiaarTaadon The State of Chliattisgarh aad another Present : Shri Hemand Gupta, counsel for fhe petitiouer. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for the respondents/ State. ORAL ORDER (5«hApril, 2006) 1. Leamed coiuisel for the petitioner subiuits fhat fhe petitioner is the son of Shri P.R. Tandon, who was working as Lecturer in fhe Govemment Higher Secondary School, Giroudpuri. Shri P.R. Taadon was died in hamess on 19.7.1998. 2. The petitioner, being one of ttie dependant-legal heirs of the deceased ffled au appUcation on 9.11.2001 for coinpassionate appointment before fhe District Education Officer, Raipur. The said application was not considered on the grotind that the petitioner has not passed Hiadi typing examiaation and retumed ttie appUcation accordingty. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, by its circular datcd 2.2.2006, has dirccted aU fhe departments to consider cases of all the dependaut-legal heir of all fhe eiuployees, who died in haruess belween 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for compassionate appoiatment. y MSst ^' 'll --B| 4. This Court, m a batch of taatters, has considered the circular dated 2.2.2006 aad subuussion oftfae Govemnient and passcd the order to the efiFect that cases of the dependant-legal heir be considered in view of the circular dated 2.2.2006, on represeatation being made by fhe dcpendant-legal heir of the deceased. 5. Accordingfy, the State Goveminent is directed to consider fhe case of the petitioner as per its own circular dated 2.2.2006 aad also ia view ofthe order dated 20.12.2005 passed by fbia Court in W.P. No. 1322/2002 and other coimected matters on its own merit, in accordance wifh law, on such representation beiag filed by the petitioner. 6. For the reasons stated-above, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs, Certi&ed copy as per Rules. Sd- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge