1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 918 OF 2006 Ms. Vaishali H. Parikh .. Petitioner . vs. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Santosh Shetty i/by M.P. Vashi & Asso. for petitioner. Mr. Vinod Mahadik for respondent B.M.C. Mr. Vishal Phal, AGP., for respondent State. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 12th April, 2006. P.C.: . Against the impugned order dated 26.12.2005 passed by the Corporation in exercise of power conferred under Section 53 (1) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act rejecting the application for regularisation the petitioner has already preferred an appeal to the State Government under Section 47 of the MRTP Act. In view of the fact that the appeal is already preferred, no interference is called for in the present writ 2 petition in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.