AB 2199/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. S.K. Muktar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. G ogoi, learned Addl. PP who produces the case diary. Ms. R. Begum appears for the informant. This is an application U/S 438 CrPC in Latasil PS Case No.122/2011 registered U/ S 294/153(A) of the IPC. After hearing the advocates appearing for the contesting parties and also on per usal of the case diary produced by the learned Addl. PP, I am inclined to allow this pre-arrest bail application. However, considering the submission made by Ms. Begum, learned counsel on the pa st history of litigation between the accused and the informant, it is made clear that the petitioner must not misuse the privilege of bail and interfere with th e ongoing investigation of Latasil PS Case No.185/2010. That case was earlier fi led by the informant against the petitioner and some other accused. With the above caution to the petitioner, this bail application stands allowed, in terms of the interim order earlier granted on 27.7.2011.