THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2290 OF 2010 DATED 8th DECEMBER, 2010. BETWEEN : R.Venkata Rama Narasimha Rao … Petitioner-De facto complainant and The State of A.P. & others … Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2290 OF 2010 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case preferred by the de facto complainant is originally numbered as Criminal Appeal No.1165 of 2004. This Court is of the view that the de facto complainant has no locus standi to file an appeal against the order of acquittal in a case investigated by Police and where charge sheet is also filed. But, on a perusal of the record, it is clear that the de facto complainant filed petition by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but the same is numbered as Criminal Appeal. Hence, the petition filed by the de facto complainant be treated as a revision. De facto complainant approached this Court challenging the judgment dated 13.06.2003 rendered in C.C.No.78 of 1998 wherein the learned Magistrate acquitted the accused under Section 248 (1) Cr.P.C. for the offence under Sections 143, 144, 447, 427 and 506 (2) of Indian Penal Code. Heard. This Court perused the entire material on record and also the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses. In a revision against acquittal, the scope of this Court is very limited and if there is any perversity or illegality appears on the face of the record, then only this Court can interfere with the finding of the lower Court. It is well settled that in a revision against acquittal, the Appellate Court can interfere only when there is possibility of one view, which is pointing towards the guilt of the accused. When there is possibility of two views and one view, which is in favour of the accused, is taken into account and the accused is acquitted by the competent Court, there is no need to interfere with the order passed by the trial Court. Considering the above said proposition of law and after perusal of the record and the impugned judgment, this Court is of the view that there is no need to interfere with the order of acquittal passed by the learned Magistrate. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Dated : 08.12.2010 sur