IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 6176 of 2008 Date of decision: 2nd July, 2008 Archana Sharma … Petitioner Versus Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak and another … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. H.C. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Balram Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate for the University. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. Present petition has been preferred by Archana Sharma, a student of four year-Bachelor of Physiotherapy Course in the Gaur Brahman College, Brahmanwas, Rohtak. Petitioner had failed in the paper of Kinesiology & Biomechanics. It has been stated that petitioner has availed all the four chances for appearing in supplementary examination in the subject of Kinesiology & Biomechanics and on three occasions, she has been awarded 36 marks in the written examination and 9 marks in the internal assessment and on the fourth occasion, she has been awarded 30 marks in written examination and 9 marks in internal assessment. It has been stated that these marks awarded to the petitioner in this solitary subject are in contrast to the marks obtained by the petitioner in other Civil Writ Petition No. 6176 of 2008 subjects, where petitioner has obtained good percentage of marks. It has been prayed in the present petition that respondent No.1 and 2, i.e. Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak through its Registrar and Controller of Examinations, Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak should be directed to produce the answer sheets and the answer sheets be got re- evaluated. In the reply filed, it has been stated by the respondent- University that petitioner had applied for rechecking of the answer sheets. After rechecking, she was informed that no discrepancy has been found and as such, her previous result stands. It has been further stated that there was no provision in the University rules for re-evaluation of answer sheet papers of Bachelor of Physiotherapy Course. Respondent-University has also brought the answer sheets pertaining to the subject of Kinesiology & Biomechanics in the Court. Petitioner, who is present in the Court, has seen her paper books and she is satisfied that these paper books belong to her. It is not in the purview of this Court to go through the evaluation. It is for the examiner to award marks. Whatever numbers have been assigned by the examiner, they are to be accepted. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no interference by this Court is called for in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE [ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA] JUDGE July 2, 2008 rps 2