IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1067 of 2008 ONKAR YADAV, SON OF LATE DEWARI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SIMRA KOLA, P.S.+DISTRICT- BANKA …………… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BAIJAL MANJHI, SON OF TARNI MANJHI 3. KALESHWAR MANJHI, SON OF NOT KNOWN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DOLAMPUR, P.S. KATORIA, DISTRICT-BANKA. 4. RAJKUMAR YADAV, SON OF GANESH YADAV 5. ANDIL MANJHI, SON OF TARNI MANJHI 6. SOSHAN MANJHI, SON OF JAGDEO MANJHI 7. BHOKRAN MANJHI, SON OF TARNI MANJHI 8. BRAHAMANAND RAI, SON OF NOT KNOWN 9. SUKDEO MANJHI, SON OF TOBIN MANJHI NO. 8 & 9 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-FITKURIA 10. MANOJ MANJHI, SON OF GANESH MANJHI 11. MANJU MANJHI, SON OF APSAR MANJHI 12. LILADHAR YADAV, SON OF BHUNEHSWAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DOLAMPUR, P.S. KATORIA, DISTRICT-BANKA 13. DUKHA MANJHI, SON OF NOT KNOWN 14. CHIRGU MANJHI, SON OF JAGDEO MANJHI 15. KISHORE MANJHI, SON OF NOT KNOWN 16. MASUDAN MANJHI @ MASUDAN MIRDHA, SON OF BIRACHI MIRDHA 17. DOMAN MANJHI, SON OF KALEHSWAR MANJHI 18. KAMAL MANJHI, SON OF TOBIN MANJHI 19. PUSO MANJHI, SON OF ISWAR MANJHI 20. SARLU MANJHI, SON OF GANESH MANJHI 21. BISHNU MANJHI, SON OF APSAR MANJHI 22. DIPU MANJHI, SON OF GOBIND MANJHI REST ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-LALPUR, P.S. SARAIYA HAT, DISTRICT-DUMKA ……… ACCUSED/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---------------------------- 04/ 17-10-2008 Heard the learned counsel. - 2 - This revision has been preferred by the informant against the judgment of acquittal recorded by the trial court. It appears that during trial not a single witness supported the prosecution case. The learned court below by a well reasoned order has acquitted the accused persons. I do not find any perversity in the same. Revision is hit by limitation also. There is no merit in this application. Accordingly, it is dismissed. S.Sb/- (Madhavendra Saran, J.)