IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI WRIT PETITION NO : 13013 of 1995 Between: S. SDRINIVASULU, S/0 LATE S.RAMUDU, R/0. B/B 403, B' CAMP, KUUNOOL DISTRICT. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL 2 ESTATE OFFICER AND MANDAL REVENUE OFICER, KALLUR KURNOOL DISTRICT. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ preferably in the nature of writ of certiorari, calling for records in R.C.No. 133/94 dated 25.5.1995 of the 2nd respondent, and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in law and further direct the respondents to transfer the allotment o the premises bearing no.b/b.403-b' camp, kurnool in the name of the petitioner as he is in occupation and further declare that the present impugned order of eviction is of ending article 14,16 and 309 of the constitution of India, by declaring that he is entitled for the same under the Rules. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner is in occupation of a Government Quarter. The petitioner submitted that on the date of death of his father, his father was working as Senior Assistant. The petitioner’s father had been allotted a Government Quarter by the Collector while he was in service, and on his appointment, the petitioner wanted to retain in the Government Quarter. But the Government passed an order of eviction, against which the petitioner filed an appeal before the appellate authority. The appellate authority dismissed the appeal. On dismissal of the appeal, a notice in terms of Section 5(1) of the A.P. Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act, 1958 (for short “the Act”) has been issued. This notice has been challenged in the writ petition on the ground that since the petitioner had succeeded his father in his job, he was entitled to retain the Government Quarter. I am not going into that question at all, because of the fact that the eviction order passed under the Act has become final, as the petitioner has lost the appeal filed against the Government and that order has not been challenged at all. The writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 28-10-2004 GJ To 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL 2 ESTATE OFFICER AND MANDAL REVENUE OFICER, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. TWO C.CS. TO THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD (OUT) 4. TWO C.D. COPIES.