IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SECOND APPEAL No 20 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- CHANDRAKANT MAHIPATRAM SHUKLA Versus RATILAL MAGANLAL LIMBDIYA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner MR HK RATHOd for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA Date of decision: 26/07/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned Advocates Mr. P.J. Yagnik on behalf of the appellant and Mr. H.K. Rathod on behalf of the respondent Smt. Savitaben Bhogilal Soni. The Party-in-person and Mr. Jayesh, son of Smt. Savitaben, are present party in person before the court. They present a compromise arrived at between the parties dated 26th July, 1999. The parties and their counsels have signed in the Consent Terms. This Consent Terms is ordered to be taken on record of this Second Appeal. 2. The decree of the courts below, against which this Second Appeal is filed, is to be modified according to the terms and conditions contained in the Compromise Purshis, which is termed as "Consent Terms" arrived at between the parties. 3. In view of the above, this Second Appeal is disposed of accordingly. -------- p.n.nair