IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33220 of 2008 KHURSHID ALAM @ MINTU MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 6.1.2009 Heard Mr. Raghav Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The rejection order indicates as if the motor-cycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. But that fact is controverted by Annexure-2, the seizure memo which indicates that the motor-cycle was recovered from the accused Salim Sai and that accused has been admitted to bail by a Bench of this Court in Miscellaneous Petition no.1476 of 2008. Let petitioner, namely, Khurshid Alam @ Mintu Mian be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Siwan, in connection with S. Tr. No.558 of 2007 arising out of Barharia P. S. case no. 62 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )