BEFORE THE HQN'BLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC-^f/6 / 2007 {SBj APPELLANT Applicant 1 S. Rajaiyya, S/o late S. Puroshottam aged about 53 years, R/o Streel no. 28 , Block no.—ll/U,Zone-2, Sector 11 , Bhilai, Distt. Durg. | C,G.,| VERSUS RESPONDENTS :>- Sukhdeo Singh, S/o Divan Singh, iMon—Applicants age 45 years, R/o A. G. R. Trans- Port, Tatibandh, Thana—Arnanaka, Raipur, [ C.G. j Driver of Santro Car No. CG/04/ZD/4052 ] Hermit Singh Gil S/o Darshan Singh Gil, age 50, R/o A. G. R. Transport, Tatiband 11, Tl lana - Amanaka, Raipur, [ C.G, | Owner. of Santro Car No.CG/04/ZD/4052 The New India Insurancc Co. U:d. Divisional Office—11, Raipur ^ { 451800 } R.D.A. Building, Bazrang Market, G. E Road , Raipur. | C.G. ] [ Policyno.—451800/31/04/00844] Valid till- 19/4/2005 Appeasl u/s 173 of Motor Vehjcle Act, 1988 For Enhancenient of Compensation : 3. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPELLANT RESPONDENTS MA(Q No. 918/2007 S. Rajaiyya @ Versus Sukhdeo Singh and others SB:- Hon. Shri N.K. Agarwal, J PRBSENT:- None appears for the parties. Shri Anand Gupta, Advocate appears on the instruction ofShri Dashrath Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent No. 3. ORAL ORDER (15-11-2010) 1. ' Case is called thrice. Even then, none appears for the appellant. 2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal. 3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge •?/