HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR m S.B. : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHQTRI J. WRIT PETITION gswo. 4021ggggQ§ l’ETITIONER Banshidhar Shukla, Son of Shli Sita I Ram Shukla, Age ~ 6O years, Head Master, Primary School Karmitikara, Black Patthalgaon, Dism'ct Jashpur (Chhattisgarh), VERSUS z I. Stata 9f Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaly, Tribal Weifhre Departmant, ‘ Digs. Bhawang Mantmlaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). , Director, Public; Instructing, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) , District Education Offwer, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). RESPONDENTS Present: Shri Anupam Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/responéents, - ORDER (Passed or; 19a; March 2007 The yetitioner, while Working as Head Master at Primary School, Karmitikara; Black Panhalgaon, Distn'ct Jashpur, was traneferred to Middle School Dhodhagaon, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarhl on the same terms and conditions Vide impugned order dated 29.09.2001 (Annexure A/l ). ) @ The Madhya Pradcsh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur Va interim ordcr dated 2111,2001 dimcted to maintaig status qua in regard to the position of the petitioner as was prevailing on 1210,2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting. Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become infmctuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever, At this point of time, there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order, However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate order keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigeneys without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order, it is weli settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a. particularofficer/employee be postedr keeping in View public interest as well as administrative exigency, This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malaiide, non- competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. In View ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. sel- Sansh K. Agnihom 2 Judge id ‘