^) ^^ COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILA8PUR -^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S). No. 439 of2(M)8 . Ram. Khilawaii SiityavaiiBhi,, aboirt 57 years. S/o Late Pai'desi, Occiipatioti - Raj Mistri Grade. I, workmg m &e office of S,D«0. g.W,D, Division No« 2, Bilaspyr, RA) Village - Bixfcona, Tahasil & Distt. - Bilaspw (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of C'hhattisgarh, 'Secreta.ry" Pvblic Works Departoieiit, Maoti'alaya, DXS. Bhawan. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Sub Divisioml Officet', Sub Division No. 2, Public Works Department (PWD) Bilaspur, IXstt. Bilaspur(C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER AR'IICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUriON OF INDIA SB:.Hon?WeShri,Satish_K,Atiii|iotri,J_, Present: Shd Rajesh Kiimar Sharma, Advocate fot the petitiot3.w. Shri Arviiid D'ybey, Panel Lawyer fbr tlie State/respoiid^jntB,. O'RALORDEK (Pa.ssed on 22nci day of Januaxy, 2008) By ttiis petition, leamed counsel appearing fbr the petilioBer sisbmits tliat tlie petitioners was employed on 0.1J)5.1981. as permaneiit Gaagnian iii the 'Public Works Departmetit District Bilaspw, who has worked &r more than 25 years as Gangman a relief ttiat 'lhe petitioner bemg peTmaaent gaB^iian be retired at the age of 62 yeai-s m a.ccordanoe ;witfa the Chhattisgarh Shashkiya Sevak (Adhivarsbilci-Ayu) Adhmiyam, 1.967 (for short 'the Act, 1967') read witb. Fundamental Rule (for sliort '.F.R.'): 56. Accordmg to leamed coyiisel fbr the petitioBer, tte petitioiier tie of permaAient em.ployee, as defiined imder Rule 2(c) of th@ Chhattisgarh (Workcharged a,nd Coiitingency Paid Emp-loyees) •Pesi8i<m Rules, 1979 (for sliort 'the Riiles, 1979), framed under Article 309 of&e Constitirtion of India. ^^fter having attained the status of th®pei-manent 4. employee, the petitioaer would retire on attaiiimg the age of 62 years on superannyation imder the provisionB ofthe Act 1967. Leamed counsel appea.ri.Bg for the petitiorser would sabmit tfaat the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by fhe decision oflhis Coyrt passed 0114th Janua.ry, 2007 m W.P. No. 108/2005 (Go^md Vs. State ofCIifaattisgarh & CXIies's) and other coBnected matters, Leamed cozmsel appear.mg for the respo.iident.s/State iiot dispttte the siibmission made by learo.ed counse! fbr fhe petiti.on.er. Accordmgly, ihc petxtioner, wfao m m to retire' OB attainmg the age of 62 years m accordance with. tfae A.ct 1967, The petition is accordingly allowed, siibject. to verificatioB.ofthe facts, No order as to costs, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge