1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2005 Shrinash Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. ..Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.A.M.Joshi, for petitioner. Ms.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for State. Mr.Ajay Joshi i/b Smt.Aparna More for respondent No.2. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2005. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2005. DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. I see no infirmity in the findings and conclusion reached by the court below. The view taken by the lower court is a possible view. The argument that change report would indicate that the persons who are authorised by resolution were not competent persons therefore cannot be the basis to be charged under section 419 of I.P.C., the court below has rightly noted that School Committee had passed resolution to withdraw the disputed amount and that decision was within the knowledge of Institution and School as well as with the consent of the concerned authorities. Viewed in this perspective, I see no reason to interfere with 2 the findings and conclusion reached by the court below. No case for exercising revisional jurisdiction. Hence dismissed.