IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9230 of 1990 Date of Decision: December 16, 2009 Bal Krishan Kapila .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 9.7.1990 (Annexure P-5) and directing the respondent department to grant all consequential benefits such as seniority, arrears of pay, increments etc. Learned counsel for the respondent- CWP No.9230 of 1990 [2] State contends that there was stay operating in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner was allowed to continue as E.T.O. All the benefits prayed for in the petition, during the pendency of the petition, have already been given to the petitioner and therefore, the matter has been rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed of as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the respondents. (AJAI LAMBA) December 16, 2009 JUDGE avin