IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2008 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 11299 of 2008(T) -------------------------- CMP.5586/2007 of J.M.F.C.,OTTAPPALAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------ SANIL K.MOHAN, S/O.K.MOHANAN PILLAI, AGED 32 YEARS, KARUNALAYAM, KAPRASSERY, NEDUMBASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR SRI.JIJO PAUL SMT.M.T.SHEEBA SRI.K.RAKESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. RAJAGOPALAN, H.C. 3460, HEAD CONSTABLE, OTTAPALAM POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.AMJED ALI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J. ---------------------- W.P.C.No.11299 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June 2008 J U D G M E N T The report of the learned Magistrate shows and the records which have been produced confirm that an order has been passed on 27/7/2007 by the learned Magistrate dropping the proceedings. The same must be reckoned as an order dismissing the complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 203 Cr.P.C. 2. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 27/7/2007 dismissing the complaint, I am satisfied that this writ petition can now be dismissed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that disciplinary proceedings has not been initiated against the fourth respondent by the first respondent though requests to that effect were made. 4. In the light of the dismissal of the complaint, I do not want to make any observation regarding that now. 5. This writ petition is in these circumstances dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No. 2 W.P.C.No. 3 R.BASANT, J. CRL.M.CNo. ORDER 21ST DAY OF MAY2007