1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 175 of 2008 HARI SINGH & ORS V/S A.D.J. ,(F.T.) NO.1,PALI & ORS. Mr. SAJJAN SINGH, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. KC SAMDARIA, for the respondent Date of Order : 10.3.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the appellant is that the appellant had filed the suit, wherein the appellant had prayed for temporary injunction, which was dismissed by the learned trial Court against which, the appellant filed appeal, and if the Appellate Court was not satisfied with the case of the plaintiff-appellant, then the appeal could be dismissed resulting into maintaining the dismissal of the temporary injunction application, but could not pass any counter injunction against the appellant, more so in view of the fact that there was no counter injunction application application against the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent agrees that there is no counter injunction application. In that view of the matter, the impugned order is clarified to mean only dismissal of the plaintiff's 2 temporary injunction application and shall not have any effect of counter injunction against the plaintiff. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. The trial Court is, however, directed to expeditiously decide the main suit. ( DEO NARAYAN THANVI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/