c. ^7 L(O-?T s IN TME HI6H COURTOF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETTTEON (C) N0. ^^ OF 201^) PETTTIONERS : .^4^ \'^cy ..-•"" ^^•^ %? ^"'" • RESPONbENTS : 2. l&anguram Patel, S/o. Shri Jagdish Ram Patel, aged about 56 years, cultivator, Rahim Baksh, S/o. Shri Gulam Nabi Baksh, aged about 55 years, cultivator, ^/ 3. Sukhiram Kunwar, S/o. Shri Panduram, Aged about 55 years, 4. Chokeshwar Patel S/o. Shri Makhanlal Patel, Aged about 38 years, cultivator, All the petitioners are R/o. Village Kusmi, Tahsil- Dongargarh, bistt. Rajnandgaon (C.6.) VERSUS ,/1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya at &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) --2. Collector, Kajnandgaon, bistt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) '3. Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Dongargarh, Distt-. Rajnandgaon (c.e.) ,4. Tahsildar, Dongargarh, Distt-. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ,/5. Gram Panchayat, Chhote Kusmi, Through its Secretary, Chhote Kusmi, Tahsil Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONJJNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE GONSTCTUTEON OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR W.P. (C)No. 1317/2011 PBTITIONERS Gangaram Patel and others Versus HESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh and others SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AOARWAL, J ORAL ORDER (21-6-2011) 1. The matter is called twice. Even then none appears for the petitiouers. 2. In fhe circiimstances, fhis Court is left wifh no option but to dismiss the petition. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd//- N.K.AgrawaI Judge "T;s£.';sr7