® SINGLE BmcH THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G‘.‘) WRIT PETITION (S) No. SLIOH OF 2011 Jaideep Jha, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Shri K.D. Jha, resident of Kanhaiyapuri, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, at present posted as Forest Ranger, Range lavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh PETITIONER VERsus 1.‘ / State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS:. Ajay Shankar Agrawal (Forest Ranger), at present attached in 'the D.F.O. Office Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE \\ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IN @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT BUASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No‘ 5404 of 2011 WRIT PETI’HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Ami'hotri. J. Present: Shri B.P.Sham~.a with Shri Rakesh Thakur. Advocates for the petitioner. Shn' Arun Sao. Government Advocate for the State“ O R D E R (I-‘assed on 22““ day 0f September, 2011) PETITIONER Jaideep Jha. VER Si IS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & A11other. 1‘ Challenge in this petition is to the orders dated 10.08.2011 (Annemxre P/l) passed by the respondent N0. 1: whereby: the respondent No. 2 has been transferred and posted at Forest Ran.e, Lawan, Forest Division Raipur, where the petitioner 1s already posted. 2. Shri Shanna: learned counsel appearing for She petitioner submits that the respondent No. 2 has been posted at a place, where the petitioner is already working He tiirther submits that the petitioner has not been transferred to any other place, thus, it is dilficult for two persons to work at one place and post. 3. Shri Sao, learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents submits that there appears to be some error in the irnpugted transfer order dated 10.Q8.2Gll (Annexure P/l). thus. the same shall not. be given effect. to in respect ofthe respondent. No. 2 as the petitioner has not been transferred or relieved from his present place of posting, till appropriate order is passed in administrative exigency and public interest; posting the petitioner as well as the respondent. No. 2 at. a place where clear vacant post is available. 4. In View of the above. according to Shri Qharma nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated observation Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI l Judge