IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 15197 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: July 13, 2010. Ashok Kumar ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 289 dated 29.03.2010, under Sections 307/323/332/353/ 186/148/149/427/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines Karnal, District Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 01.04.2010. It is further contended that one Pushpinder alleged to have died on account of negligence of the doctor and hence, a mob collected and attacked the doctors. It is CRM No.M-15197 of 2010 further contended that petitioner has not been named in the FIR and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further contended that co-accused Parvinder Singh @Monu and Manjeet Singh @Hathi were allowed bail by this Court in Crl.Misc.No.M-15823 of 2010 vide order dated 05.07.2010 and the case of the present petitioner is on similar footing. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Ashok Kumar, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Karnal. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) July 13, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2