c.^^l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CmiATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION('S)NO.^S ^ /2QQ6 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTIQN_OFJNDLA, PETITIONER..--"' , ,^>/ '€s^/ Rebeka Minj, wife of Shri Ignasiyus Minj, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Puranga, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (sl.no. 79 of Annexure P-1) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3. The Block Education officer, Block Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. ~~!>x ^y HI6H COURT OF OWATnSGMM AJ KELASPW W.P. (s> No. 7500 of 2006 Retitioher : Painch fem Navrang Versus Respondents : State of Chhattiagarh and anolher W. P. falNo. 7B01af2006 Petitioner : Jugal Rom Chakresh Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhffttisgarh cnd ano-ther W. P. (s) NB. 7S02 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Jogdish Chandro Yadm Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhattisourh ond anoKw W. P. falNo. 7303 af 2006 Petitioner : Dici Sai Raikra Versus Respondents : Storte of Oihoittisgarh ond awlher W. P. (sl No. 7S04 nf 200& Petitioner : NandkeahwKB-Ram Bhagat Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhatti^arh and ano-ther W. P. falNu. 7BOB<rf2006 Petitioner : Samelal Khuntc Versus Respondents : Starte of Chhuttisgnrh and orwther W. P. fal NB. 7B08 <rf 8)06 Pctitioner : Smt. Philomina Kindo Versus Respondents : Slate of Chhtrttisgnrfi and ono-ther W. P. (s) No. 7B09 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Shycmi Sunder Yadoiv Re^fondentS verws State of Chhattiftwi4> <nd nnother W. P. fal No 7S10 af 2006 Petitioner : Hilariyus Kujur Versus Respondents : Stofte of Chhattisgurh and olhers W. P. fal Nn 7S11 <rf 2006 Petitwner : Ku. Rajkunari bahariya Versus Re^iondents : Stnte of Chhtrttisgarh and o'thers W.P. fslNo. 7B12<»f2006 Petitiwter : ftong Vallabh Sidor Verais Respondents : S+ate of Chhuttisgenrh ond onolher W. P. (s) Nn. 7513 af 2006 Petitioner : Ramckilar Keshknr Versus Reapondents : Storte of Chhattisgarh ond olhers W. P. fal Na 7314 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Pradyumn KumcB- Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiSBarh ond olhers W. P. fel NB TStSaf 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Lukfahiya MinJ Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhcrttisgarh and onolher W. P. fel NB. 7516 <rf 200& Petitioner : Tinw-thhnis Toppo Vcrsus Re^ondents ; Stnte of Chhatttegar+i and olhers W. P. (s) N» 7517 af 2006 Petitwner : AmrH'Kumar Versus : StateofChhatti<dBrhond<rthers ResDondents \. ! W P. (s) - ni8 nf 2006 Petitioner :. Duku'Ekl<u Versus Respendents : Stcrte of ChhcMistwrh ond olhers W. P. fai Nn. TO19 af 200& Petitioner : A rad Kujur Versus Respondents : Stocte of Chhattisoarh ond awther W. P. ts) Nn 7B21 rf 2QO& Petitioner : Probhu Sai Tirky Versus Reapondents : Stnte of ChhattisBurhand olhers W. P. falNo. 7R2<rf2006 Petitfoner : Jagannarth Ram Vergus Btesponden-te : S*n*e of Chhanisaarh and ofters W. P. friNo. 7S23af200& PetHwner : Mamar Sai Raikru Ve.raus Respondents : Stnte ofChbattisgarh <nd otiiers W. P. fal NB. 7B24 af 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Rebeka Mhj Versus Respondents : Stcrte of Chhattisoarh and olhers W. P. fslNa. raZSrf 200ft Petitioner : Ajit Kumar Tirky Versus ftespondenfe : State of Chhnttiawrh cndono^her And ^ P te tt. TBZfirf 2006 Retitioner : Rnmkumar Banjare ResBondents wrsus SWiBofChhnttisifarhaidtinolher ^ SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Sdrtish K. Agnihotri. J Atr. AM. Bhaktix, Advoaxte for the petitioners. fhrs. Anju Mwja, Dqwty Sovemment Advoarte for •the reapondenta/Stnte. OROER (Pasaed on 9* doy of Janunry, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appeuring for •the petitioners as Niell as leemed Oeputy fiovemment Advocarte appearin9 fw the reapondents/State johitly submit -tho* •Ihe fncts of 1t»present case are similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sudiil TwiKiri A o-thers Vs. SMe 6evt. of ChhattiagcB+t A o'thers), which was allowed vide order dated 7<h November, 2006. They further aubmit Ihat Ihe question of taw involwsd is also Ihe some. 2. In view of ihe above stnted submissions nwde by teamed counal for •the porties, •these writ petitions arts nllowed m terms of -rtw order dated 7*1' Navembcr. 2006 passed by •this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order es to costs. 3. A copy of Ihis order be placed on record in o-ther connected writ petitions. Subhdsh Sd/- SatishK.Agsihotri Judge