THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.23322 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner registered himself with the Institute of Chartered Accountant of India, the respondent herein. The course of Chartered Accountancy comprises of Intermediate and final examinations. The petitioner completed intermediate examination. He appeared in the final examination in May, 2006. He did not get through. He appeared in November, 2007 and May 2008. In those two attempts also, he did not get through. The petitioner states that before 2004, he devoted much of his time to write articles on various subjects, touching on the governance, and from 2004 onwards, he concentrated on studies in Accountancy only. He contends that on account of the articles written by him, the concerned agencies may have got prejudiced and awarded inadequate marks to him. The petitioner appeared as party-in-person. During the course of arguments, he stated that he acquired the Intermediate Examination of Chartered Accountancy in three attempts. After completing that examination, admittedly he diverted his attention to aspects, other than accountancy, and was busy in writing articles. It was only in the year 2006, that he appeared in the final examination. He scored 246 out of 800. In the subsequent two examinations, the scoring was 314 and 331, out of 800. The prayer in this writ petition is, to direct the respondent, to produce the answer scripts of the petitioner, for the purpose of verification, as to whether proper valuation was made. Such a request cannot be acceded to. The allegations made by the petitioner are totally unrelated, vague and general. It is just ununderstandable as to how the officials or authorities of the respondent are concerned about the activities undertaken by the petitioner. Utmost secrecy is maintained about the identity of the person, vis-à-vis the answer script. Except the performance of the candidate, no other factor would weigh with the examiner. This Court is not inclined to admit the writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.30-10-2009. KO