IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20759 of 2008 Date of decision : 11.05.2011 M/s Bharat Diagnostic Centre ....Petitioner versus Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Mr. Pavit Singh Mattewal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.3. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The bare perusal of the record would reveal that nemo appeared on behalf of the petitioner either on 09.08.2010 or on 17.11.2010 and 18.04.2011, when this petition came up for hearing. Consequently, the case was adjourned to 11.05.2011 for arguments Today, again no one is present on its behalf despite the case having been repeatedly called. From the sequence of events narrated here-in-above, it appears that neither the petitioner nor its counsel is interested in pursuing the petition. Therefore, no option is left with this Court except to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. May 11, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge