IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.158 of 2007 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, NORTH EAST RAILWAY, GORAKHPUR, NOW UNDER THE GENERAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, HAJIPUR. 2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (PERSONAL), EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, SONEPUR. 3. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (ENGINEERING), EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, SONEPUR. 4. THE DIVISIONAL ACCOUNTSOFFICER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, SONEPUR. 5. ASSISTANT ENGINEER (WEST), PW 1, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, SAMASTIPUR. ------- APPELLANTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES Versus URMILA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE SATYANARAYAN YADAV, VILLAGE – CHANON BINDTOLI, P.S. BARAUNI, DISTT. BEGUSARAI (BIHAR) ---- RESPONDENT ----------- 11. 09.12.2010 Heard the parties. Limitation for filing the present Appeal is hereby condoned and the matter will be heard on merits. The Appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2001 passed by the Deputy Labour-Cum-Workmens Compensation Commissioner, Munger Division, Begusarai, in Workmen Compensation Case No. WC-03 of 2001 by which a sum of ` 1,69,440/- has been ordered to be paid to the legal dependents of the deceased worker Satyanarain Yadav. From the facts of the case, it appears that the final order was passed on 18.12.2001 and there would be no jusitification in keeping the proceedings pending any further which would work to the detriment of the heirs of the Claimants. It has been submitted that a sum of Rs. 1,59,800/- has already been paid to the dependent of the deceased 2 worker. Under the circumstances, I direct that the Appellants pay a sum of ` 10,000/- to the heirs of the dependents of the deceased within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. It is agreed by the respondent that on such payment there would be no further claim upon the Appellants by her. With these observations, this Appeal is disposed of. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)