IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2011 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16087 of 2011(I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- B.THANKAMANI, D/O. BHAVANI, KODAMBATTU HOUSE, KIZHUNILAM VILLAGE, KADUVAYIL, ATTINGAL P.O., CHIRAYINKEEZHU. BY ADV. SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, STATE SEED FARM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU.PIN- 695 304 4. MOLLY R., THENGUMMUDUMBAL VEEDU, VALIYELA, CHIRAYINKEEZHU.PIN-695 304 R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts 2/- -2- WP(C)NO.16087/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.TC(1)5320/09 DATED 14/10/2009 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.TC(1)5320/09 DATED 21/06/2010 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.TC(1)5320/09 DATED 22/10/2009 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. P4 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.TC(1)5320/09 DATED 04/06/2010 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. P5 COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST DATED 30/05/2011 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT P6 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04/06/2011 BY SEED FARM CASUAL LABOURS TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P7 COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.SSF CKL 18/11-12 DATED 01/06/2011 BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE MEMBER, FARM COUNCIL. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 16087 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was a casual worker in the State Seed Farm, Chirayinkeezhu from 2003 to 2007. The 2nd respondent has prepared a seniority list of persons for regularisation in service by Ext. P1. Although there was initially a stay of regularisation pursuant to the same, that has subsequently been lifted. Now a revised list Ext. P5 has been prepared, which is not in tune with Ext. P1. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext. P6 representation before the 3rd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P6 expeditiously. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P6, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, before granting approval to Ext. P5 list Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/