'A BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURP C.G. hrthe^Iatter pf W.P.No.^ ' ~~/2003 PETITIONER G.K. Gurudwan, aged about 50 years son of Shri R.K.D. Gurudwan, resident Ex.Cashier cum Clerk, State Bank of India, Akaltara Branch, residing at Neera Datar CarrTpus, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Versus RESPONDENTS '''' .<S>£^ ^^e^" ^^T' '^" ./I .•"^•' 1) Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local head Office, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh). Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3) Assistant General Manager / Disciplinary Authority, State Bank of India, Region - 5, Zonal Office, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 4) Union of India, through : Registrar, Central ^-Govern.Hient Industrial Tribu]>al7Jaba^pdr(Madhya Pradesh). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227/of THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND /OR ANY OTHER COMMAND OF LIKE NATURE ^^'^l, '^.-.- -'• .iP'XI-HC- an^r'mtoN 88)1 3(!^( sbt WNCTt »»*<! 3-s^-^pn?^,-^W®,re»ni*fii< ^P )o^ SI^Ft'l'h irfinw 'stet sn^'i +l«S<-1'4l-t41^ 4 fe^ XftR?K ^siRnOT^ii Petjtionei G.p.. Gurud'A'an, aged about 50 years, sot; or Shrt R.K.D. Gurudv'/an. resident Ex[ Cashier cum Cierk, State Bank of inctia, Akaltara Branch. residina at Ne^ra Datai- Campus, Shankar Nagar, Ra|puyr Distt. Raipur (CG) Verdis Chjef Gensral Manager, Staie Bank of lnc(a, Locai Head Ornce, Bhopal SMhdhya Pradesh) of Ral 3. Aea 3uiy General Manager, State Bank ;ndia. Zonal Office. Shankar Naaar, 'pw (CG) isfant General Manager/Discipilnary Auyiority, Stafe Bank of india; Region - 5, fonai Office, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (CC|) Unljsn of India, througii Registrar, Ce^tral Government industrial Tribunai, jab^ipur (Madhya Pradesh) ?or issusnc^ pf wnt .j'n tne nattire of mandamil cornmand of llke natare Prssenf: Shri Asf'iok Son'. counsel S;'ri A.C. Sahu, counse! ft> (Passed on 0: ror the petitione; >r responaents. f-lorl tt l ne psritioner nas Tiieci the ini respondents fo reinsfaie the pefitioner o| al! backvT/acies, arrears and increments .02.2009) tant petition for a ciirectlon to the 1 the posf of cashier cum ,c!erk w'fh . eto and in the ^alfernafjvs t.o..to'id- ,-„. c^^.- - ^ t-1fl ^ XI-HC—78 inw(r«t*ficR •s^•^ti<»tct*f,'•^tfty'K, fa<iws< ..^£;.........i..o..3.1...-r •-8^200^ 311^1 TH^C^I^^t) •TOntR'flte sii^ stiitita'fl-i wi^ -i? fe'ATfsngR sfi^n ffx Ww •aqi 311^1 a>iii> under the facts and circumstances imposed on the petitioner was harsh, appropr[ate compensation. (2) .earned counse! for the pet sought by the petitioner in the petition th;s peiiiion, the petifioner has attainei of the case that if the punishment the petifioner shouid be awarded with fener does not press for the reiief :and submits that during pendency of y age of superannuation and as such is entitted for the retria! dues and ther^fore, a direotion is sought against the respondents to settie the retrial due| for which the pstitloner is entitled against the specined period. (3) On the other hand; learned cc that in case the petltioner files fresh 'etrla] duss, the same shait be considl within a pertod cf four weeks from the c} fd'i the psrtres. the instant petition is dismii .insei for the respondents submittea representation for settlement of his 6red and decided by the respondsnt [ate of receipt of the representation. In v;ew of the above submissic^s made by the iearned counsel fbr |sed. However, iiberty is rssen/ed to the petitioner to file representetion for ^ettlement of his retria! dues befors the respondents, On such represent^tion being made, the respondents shall decicfe fhe same wifhin a further|period of 4 weeks from the dafe of receipf of represenfation in accordar Afith !aw. Sd/-- MISHRA r'vs judge Bf tllt