IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 16565 of 1999 Between: 1 M. Arjuna Raju, S/o. Rama Raju, Helpers (Technical) in T.C.P.C.,A.P.V.C.C.,Bakkannapalem, Visakhapatnam. 2 I. Abaddam, S/o. Sanyasi, Helpers (Technical) in T.C.P.C.,A.P.V.C.C.,Bakkannapalem, Visakhapatnam. 3 V. Prabhakar Rao, S/o. Sankara Rao, (All are working as Helpers (Technical) in T.C.P.C., A.P.V.C C., Bakkannapalem, Visakhapatnam). ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Gove of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary, Women's Development & Child Welfare (WHD) Dept, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 A.P. Vikalangula Cooperative Corporation, Rep by its Managing Director, B.R.K.R.Buildings, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3 The Project Oficer, Training - cum - Production Centre, A.P.Vikalangula Cooperative Corporation, Bakkanaplem, Visakhapatnam, ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the arrears of salary consequent upon re- fixation of their salaries pursuant to the proceedings RC. NO. 24/90/TCPC, dt. 4.1.1996 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 & 16 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioners as per the proceedings Rc.No. 24/90TCPC, dt. 4.1.96 and consequential Lr. Ref.No. 24/90/TCPC, dt. 18.5.96 of the 3rd respondent forthwith and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No. 16565 of 1999 Order: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in view of payment of arrears of salary to the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date: 21.01.2009 Nsr