IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 2352 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 03, 2011 Parmod ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. R.P. Daaria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Deswal, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for the release of detenues as mentioned in Para No.4 of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No.4 to 7. Learned State counsel has already filed reply, which is on the file. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that all the alleged detenues have since been released and hence, the present petition has become infructuous. Reply filed by respondent-State is also to the effect that none of the alleged detenues was detained illegally at the brick kiln. In view of the abovesaid reply and statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having infructuous. February 03, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE