1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2009 Suresh Dagadu Chavan ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Daulat G. Khamkar for the Petitioner Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 13, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner overstayed parole by 112 days. The respondents have passed an order that for next 5 years, the petitioner would not earn any remission, as there were no remissions available to him. After arguing for a while, it is stated that certain new Guidelines have already come into force. 2. Therefore, we direct that the petitioner’s case be considered afresh by the respondents, as, by the impugned order, 2 he would be losing more than 5 days per day of remission, and under the new Guidelines, a deduction of more than 5 days per day is not permissible. 3. The petition is accordingly disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.