IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.21017 of 1995 Between: T Sunki Reddy S/O Venkatarami Reddy, V.A.O., R/O H.No.41/106, Kothapeta , Kurnool, Kurnool Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Inspector Of Police, Kurnool Taluk Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool Dist. 2 Shaik Mahaboob Peera, Sub-Inspector Of Police, Defacto complainant K. Nagalapuram Police Station, Kurnool Dist ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, calling for the F.I.R relating to Cr. No. 21/95 of K. Nagalapuram P.S., Kurnool Dist and quash the same as illegal, holding that the F.I.R. does not constitute the starting point of lawful investigation. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.SREERAMULU REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1and 2: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 01.11.2004 Nsr To 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KURNOOL TALUK CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DIST. 2 SHAIK MAHABOOB PEERA, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K. NAGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DIST 3 Two CCs to G.P for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T) 4 Two CD copies.