IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2295 of 2011 ROHIT KUMAR . Versus SWETA VERMA & ANR . ----------- 2. 03.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is the husband seeking restitution of conjugal right. The opposite party no. 1, produced the marriage certificate denying the genuineness of her signature. The marriage certificate being an official document co-terminus evidence shall easily be available from the records of the Registrar of marriages, if considered necessary. The primary issue in the present proceedings are restitution for conjugal right. The trial Court has already noticed the conduct of the petitioner. The Court does not find any merit in the application. It is accordingly dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)