IN THE HIGH COURT OF JL‘JDIéATURE AT ‘ (CHHAT+ISGARH) WRIT PETITION NOScgq‘OF 2005 PETITIONER : K’ SHRI SHRI 1008 SHRI DANTESHWARI, DHARMIK SARVAJANIK TDHARAMSHALA SAMITI ‘Through llts PreSIdent §N R K Plllal Son L)f La e Shrl K ‘K Nair aged about [64 ya‘ars, ‘ ReSIdent of Trlmurty BhaT an, Rest House Road Dantewaoa DIStrICt’ South Bastar Dantewada (CHHATFISGARH) VERSUS I I STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through IThe Registrar i firms \and SOCIetles« O 5T, Anupa I Ralpur, (CHHATTISGARH RESPONDENTS kl. : m Nagar ,r2. THE COLLECTOR, District Siouth Bastar, Dantewada, (CHHATTISGARH). - .,3. THETAHTSILDAR ‘ Dantewada, Dlstnct South Bastar I Dantewada (CHHATI'IS ARH) T I I I I // ‘ ‘ IT WRIT fPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 \‘OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. H : m aim-a; w?5@g7 mzoo § ’ mmmmésr 311%:1w (13W) WWWQ’WW ‘ , $Wm€$ "2;, 21-10-2im5 ‘ I Mr. Ehaskar Payashi, s: unsei far we pefifioner. Mr. Vashwan'f Singh re§pondenfs. Heard bo‘l'H ‘Hqe caunsel. By fhe insfanf wrif pal-Him, fhe pe+ifionér impugns +he order- dnwd 28-9-2005 (Annex Thakur', 65W. Advocafe for “rhea Smfe/ 9-15) passed by The Qegigfrsr, Fir-ms & Societies, Raipur. This or er is appeaiabie before fhe Gwernmenf, harnm’ive remedy. Learned counsel for- impugned has been 9assed b ' us fhe perusai of fhe order paésed on the advise of Th compiainant Learned Geyt. Ads/ace e for the Smm/respondenfs submits ‘i'nat in View of +he proviso 1'0 r Therefore; i‘he pefifioner has ihe geti’n‘oner submifs ’i‘hm‘ fhe erder vioia'fing The principles oi: na‘i’umi jus‘i'ice, impugned reveuis #af ‘rhe order has been i Coiiec‘mr, whereas, fhe Coiiec‘mr wee “the Section 34 of, fhe Chha‘i‘risgarh $acief§r Regis‘irikaran Adhiniyam, 19> 3, befare dissoiuTian of The sociefy, The was bounci %a have The opiriicn a‘f The Coiled-m2 .iha'r is why The opi ion was soughf far. ET 33' admifred posifi n ma? The erder' impugned is appeaiabie before fhe Sfafe'Gavemme fend fhere is e s‘ifai-ufory provision under Sea-ion 40 af ihe Chhaifis rh SocieTy Regisi'rikamn Adhiniyam, 1973. ‘ Regisfmr, Firms 6i 5ocie1’ie SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 u LO.A5@£.." W mwi$ g mzoo anéetm () W mmmmw K 2. In The given sifuai'ion W#WW *Wm 501m v ..‘ Th pé‘h‘honer‘ H" s9 cdvrsed can fife appeai > agmnsf The Impugned erder befare The Conecfar Wrrh The observa'riifns aforesaid, The wrif pew-ion sfands disposed of. Cansequanfiy, M.‘(W‘)F sfnrid disposed of. cerTified copy of 'fnis arder. / Sdl‘ L.C.Bhad“° Judge Par-ms are emi'ried f0 - S IFS/2005 - 20.000 é‘ y ’.o..411.2005 and A.No.3941/2005 also P 7. W N3/ 1 ' V /