IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 25TH BHADRA 1932 WA.No. 2231 of 2009() -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17833/2009 DATED 27/08/2009 .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 6 IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ANCHAL POST, ANCHAL. 2. ANCHAL BLOCK PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ANCHAL POST. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EUBI BINU, W/O.BINU, PULLATHU HOUSE, CHEMMANTHOOR, PURALUR POST. 2. THE PROJECT-DIRECTOR & JOINT PROGRAMMER CO-ORDINATOR P.A.V., KOLLAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 4. THE PRESIDENT, ANCHAL BLOCK PANCHAYATH ANCHAL POST, ANCHAL. 5. THE VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERATE, IMS COMPOUND, TRIVANDRUM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN. R3 & R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.K. MEERA. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------- W.A No.2231 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 16th September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. This writ appeal is filed against the interim order directing the appellant to retain the respondents in service. We do not find any ground to interfere with the order of stay against respondents because at the request of the appellants, we have listed the writ petition for hearing before the Division Bench itself. Accordingly, the writ appeal is closed. Appellants are free to challenge the observations in the interim order while arguing the writ petition. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE ma