IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-22736 of 2009 Date of decision:27.11.2009. Saroop Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Gurdev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by Balwinder Kaur and Joga Singh, Sarpanch and Numbardar of village Habibwal respectively, who are also present in the Court. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and the FIR No.43 dated 28.03.2009, under Sections 326, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC, P.S. Bholath, District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 27, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE