IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 18988 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.08.2010 Balbir Singh and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Arvinder Arora, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) CRM No. 43146 of 2010 This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for placing on record the certified copy along with true typed copy of Annexure P-3. Application is allowed and Annexure P-3 is taken on record. Main case It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the complainant that a civil suit was filed by the complainant. In para 5 of the said suit, it is stated that: “5. That later on, mutation No. 1201 dated 26.01.1991 and mutation No. 1488 dated 31.01.1992 were got entered and sanctioned but the same were not correctly entered and sanctioned due to some clerical errors or otherwise and therefore some disputes have crept up since the name of the plaintiff did not find mention in the said mutations but however, the plaintiff continued to be the joint owners in possession of the said joint site over which foundations were lying filled up.” It is also not disputed that a statement has already been suffered by the present petitioner in favour of the complainant. Thus, it cannot be said at this stage that the record is tampered. Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Ram Kumar, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, the order dated 07.07.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 23, 2010 mohan