IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-31863 of 2008 Date of decision : 6.5.2009. ... Neelam ................ Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. R.D. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Sh. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise for offence under Section 376 IPC. Compromise cannot be allowed for offence under Section 376 IPC. So, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 6.5.2009. Judge chugh