IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17024 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 21, 2010. Mahesh Kumar .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Mansur Ali, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to ensure that the Schemes dated 28.5.2010 (Annexures P-1 & P-2) for auctioning of the plots for shops-cum-offices/shops are implemented as per law. It appears that there is a dispute with regard to the control and management over the subject sites between the Improvement Trust, Fazikla and the Estate Officer, PUDA. While the Improvement Trust claims its ownership rights over the subject sites for which a Scheme is also said to have been approved by it, the PUDA authorities have already `sold' some of the plots at their own. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that instead of fighting a proxy war, such like inter-se C.W.P.No .17024 of 2010 2 disputes between two Government Agencies ought to have been resolved by the authorities at their own level. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Ferozepur, to convene a meeting and resolve the afore-mentioned dispute at the earliest. Dasti. September 21, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE