IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28250 of 2008 UDAY YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.7.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. Petitioner’s bail application was earlier rejected on 4.7.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant and the wife of the informant who claim to be eye witnesses to the occurrence have resiled from the statement before the court below during trial. This fact may be ascertained by the court below and if it is true, the court may consider the bail application of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to file an application before the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jehanabad for consideration of bail. The bail application of the petitioner is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)