IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47123 of 2008 1.RAM BALAK RAI S/O-Raghuni Rai 2.RAM PUKAR RAI S/O-Parmeshwar Rai Both R/O-Vill-Dih Boria, P.S.-Bibhutipur, Distt.-Samastipur. …………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 18.02.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are named accused of the case in which the informant has alleged that she has been raped by the petitioners. It has been submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that prior to the present case which is of 03.02.2008, a Complaint Case has been lodged against the informant and her husband by the petitioner Ram Balak Rai. That Complaint Case has been filed on 18.09.2007 and after much delay the present case has been filed. Further submission is that allegation of rape has not been corroborated during medical examination. The injury report of the informant has been noted in the impugned order. The prosecutrix has received bruise over knee and cheek. The allegation is corroborated by the injury report also. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the - 2 - petitioners is rejected. However, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail in the Court below, if the informant does not support the prosecution case. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)