IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2010 / 8TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1468 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- ( AGAINST THE ORDER IN R.P. 956 of 2009 IN WPC.21670/2009 ) PETITIONER/IST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------- M/S. K.B.VILASOM CASHEW FACTORY, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, K.R. RADHAKRISHNAPILLAI. BY ADV. SRI.E.A.BIJUMON RESPONDENT/REVIEW PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- E.K. SURENDRAN, BRANCH MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, THEVANOOR BRANCH, AYUR.P.O, KERALA - 691 533. BY ADV. MR. P.B. SURESH KUMAR, SC. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE NO. 1468 OF 2009 IN R.P.No. 956 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C)No. 21670 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 28th January, 2010 J U D G M E N T This Contempt Case has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance on the part of the contemnor with regard to the direction given by this Court vide order dated 5th Ocotober 2009 in R.P. 956 of 2009 in W.P.(C)No. 21670 of 2009 . The case put forth by the petitioner is that as per the verdict , the respondent Bank was directed to give a statement showing the principal amount due, excluding the interest payable from 01.10.1997, which in fact was directed to be given as per the judgment dated 06.08.2009 itself. 2. The learned Counsel for the Bank, with reference to the statement filed on behalf of the respondents, also producing various documents as Annexures R1(a) to R1(e), submits that a detailed statement showing the entire outstanding liability, also giving credit to the amount paid by the Writ Petitioner on the relevant dates, was supplied to the petitioner and that the petitioner himself has chosen to produce the same as Annexue- A2 in the Contempt Petition. The various facts and figures with CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE NO. 1468 OF 2009 IN R.P.No. 956 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C)No. 21670 OF 2009 2 reference to the dates were also substantiated by the Counsel as given in Annexure-A2 and also in the light of the documents produced before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, copies of which have been produced before this Court as well along with the statement marked as Annexures-R1(a) to R1(e). 3. Taking note of the facts and events as explained from the part of the respondent, this Court is very much satisfied that the direction given by this Court has been substantially complied with by the respondent and that there is absolutely no contumacious act on the part of the contemnor. That apart, there is no representation for the petitioner as well. In the said circumstances, no further proceedings need be pursued. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk