IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2009 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9201 of 2009(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.V.JAYAPRAKASH, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KALLACHIERIL, KUMARAKOM EAST P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, THE KERALA TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, KERALA TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC, KTWWFB, FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.9201 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 23rd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that the 1 st respondent issued Ext.P1, a pre assessment notice. It is stated that on its receipt, he has filed Ext.P2 objection. In this writ petition, his apprehension is that the respondents will proceed to finalise Ext.P1 without taking into account Ext.P2 objection filed by him. 2. I heard the learned standing counsel for the respondents also. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, he has filed Ext.P2 objection on receipt of Ext.P1 notice, there is no reason why the respondents shall proceed to finalise Ext.P1, ignoring Ext.P2. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1 st respondent to finalise Ext.P1 taking into account Ext.P2 and after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner also. Orders in the manner as above shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1 st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg