IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.21798-M of 2009 Date of Decision:17.1.2011 Surinder Pal .... Petitioner Versus Nirmala Devi .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the complaint No.108 dated 20.7.2006 titled Nirmala Devi v. Surinder pal and others, under Sections 420,406,120-B IPC pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barnala. Upon notice, reply has been filed by the respondent. As per preliminary objection No.1 of the said reply, the petitioner is absconding and not putting in appearance and subjecting himself to the jurisdiction of the learned trial Court inspite of being summoned through bailable and non bailable warrants issued against him in this case. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage in view of the reply. Dismissed as not pressed. 17.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE