IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1125 of 2005 (M/B) Naseem Ahamad S/o Sri Barru Hassan, R/o Vilage Jaurassi-Jabardastpur, Police Station Kotwali, Roorkee, District Haridwar. …….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. 2. Station Officer, P.S. Manglaur, District Haridwar. 3. P.K. Nagar, Supply Inspector, Block Narsan, P.S. Manglaur, District Haridwar. ……. Respondents Mr. Rajendra singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Rajendra singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for the respondents. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, the learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Naseem Ahamad seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 06.10.2005 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 8376 of 2005 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 04.07.2006 04.07.2006 G