IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31039 of 2008 BINAY MAHTO @ BINAY MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 323, 353, 147, 149, 341 and 307/34 of I.P.C. For the reason that the petitioner, who is the owner of the allegedly overloaded truck, is alleged to have assaulted a Government servant on duty, this Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail on the submission that the nature of the assault alleged does not invoke Section-307 of I.P.. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits in that background , without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )