IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.546 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.4.2010 Jagtar Singh ..Petitioner. Vs. Manjit Kaur @ Taro ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rajbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 21.12.2009 whereby evidence of the plaintiff/petitioner has been closed in terms of the order recorded on the previous date when the counsel for the plaintiff had stated that he will produce the entire evidence on the next date of hearing failing which his evidence would be deemed to have been closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be given the last opportunity on payment of costs. Generally, such kind of request are maintained but the order is pre-emptory by nature which has been recorded on the undertaking of the plaintiff that in case the plaintiff would be failing to lead evidence, then his evidence would be deemed to have been closed. Thus, the prayer of the petitioner cannot be entertained. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 28.4.2010 Judge Meenu