IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.277 of 2009 Prem Shanker Dubey & Ors Versus Ram Ekbal Dubey@Nathuni Dubey ---------------------------------- 4 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the Title Suit No. 76 of 1989 itself was restored to its original file and in that view of the matter he confined his prayer only for a direction for consideration of his case in the suit itself if he files a petition and this order may not prejudice him. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party has submitted that in view of restoration of the suit itself, this civil revision application has become infructuous and as such no direction should be given. In view of the facts stated above, the learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw this civil revision application. The prayer is allowed. It goes without saying that the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all his objections in the suit itself in accordance with law. This civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid M.Rahman (V. Nath, J)