IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19955 of 2009 1. GAJADHAR LAL,son of late Mahabir Lal 2. Kanti Devi,wife of Gajadhar Lal 3. Soni Kumari, daughter of Gajadhar Lal 4. Suraj Kumar,son of Gajadhar Lal Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 14-07-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.4 Suraj Kumar, who has been shown minor below 18 years, needs a better treatment, for which he is advised to get his age assessed by the court where the case is pending and thereafter seek proper remedy from the Juvenile Justice Board. With such observation his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. As about rest, petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law, petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law and petitioner no.3 is the sister- in-law (unmarried). For the informant, it is said that she instigated her husband to ask petitioners no.1 and 2 to sell the residential house and give him 1/3rd share for making residence at his Sasural, which they refused. Thereafter force was used. So, a case was lodged on their behalf against the son and daughter-in-law, much prior to filing of the present case to save their skin. The informant has been made instrumental by filing the case with false allegation, though she has made her husband an accused also. In the discussed facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners no.1, 2 and 3 is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the 2 date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Buniyadganj P.S.Case No.88 of 2008, the above named petitioners except petitioner no.4 Suraj Kumar shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )