IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8810 of 2011 Date of Decision : 11.10.2011. Divya Thakur ……Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. R. K Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G with Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. for respondents –State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “i) That the order contained in Annexure P-1 dated 27.8.2011 may kindly be quashed or in the alternative the respondent-department may be directed to consider the representation dated 27.8.2011 made by the petitioner sympathetically for her adjustment nearby Solan and while deciding the representation also take into consider the grounds taken in the present writ petition.” 2. In the nature of the order, we propose to pass at this stage, we do not think it necessary to go into the merits of the case since the petitioner has submitted in detail her case before the first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into Annexure P-1, representation, with the required indulgence and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law and justice within two weeks from the 2 date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. The petitioner shall not be compelled to join the transferred station till such time and it will be open to her to avail leave of the kind due. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Authenticated copy to the petitioner. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (rana/pankaj)