FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.9 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Sonal holding for Mr. A.K. Bakshi for the petitioner. Mrs.P.H. Kantharia, APP. for the Respondent-State. .................. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED: 18/2/2005. PC: . This is an application filed by the original accused No.4 for quashing a complaint against him. The point sought to be made out that he is only a Production Manager and Incharge of Production. However, from the complaint, it appears that he is said to be the Director incharge of the business and management of accused No.1 company and one of the person responsible for conducting business of the company. Further, acts are attributed of the applicant in Paragraph Nos. 5 and 6. At this stage, we have to go by the averments made in the complaint and since the basic ingredients of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act have been averred, there is no substance in the point raised. Hence, petition is rejected. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)