Crl. Misc. No. M- 2686 of 2009 Ranjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab. Present: Mr.Sandeep Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Aman Deep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. **** While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 30.1.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only a lalkara has been attributed to the petitioner. Notice of motion to the Advocate General, Punjab for 15.4.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to her furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, she shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Nachhattar Singh, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 30.1.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE May 21, 2009 anita