THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6086 OF 2006 Dated 11th August, 2009 Between: Deep Singh …Petitioner And V.Varalaxmi and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : MR M.BASITH ALI YAVAR Counsel for the respondent : MR R.A.ACHUTHANAND The Court made the following: O R D E R: The respondents filed O.S.No.1427 of 2002 in the Court of Additional Judge, City Small Causes Court-cum-VI Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the petitioner for eviction. They have also filed I.A.No.543 of 2005 under Order XV-A CPC, with a prayer to direct the petitioner to deposit the undisputed rents. The application was opposed by the petitioner. The trial Court ordered the application, on 07.11.2006, directing the petitioner to deposit arrears from 01.05.2002 till the end of October, 2005, calculated at the rate of Rs.1400/- per month, and to continue to deposit the rent at that rate. The petitioner challenges the same. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. It is no doubt true that the petitioner asserted his own right on the basis of an agreement of sale and that a suit for specific performance is pending. All the same, the relationship of lessor and lessee was, prima facie, found to be existing. The undisputed rent is Rs.1400/- per month. The trial Court took note of the same and passed the order under revision in terms of Order XV-A CPC. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the order under revision. There is some dispute as to whether the petitioner has cleared the arrears or complied with the interim orders passed by this Court from time to time. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed upholding the order under revision and granting four (4) weeks’ time to the petitioner to clear the arrears, if any. The respondents shall be entitled to withdraw the amounts, which are already in deposit and those, which would be deposited in future, without furnishing any security. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated 11th August, 2009 vrn