IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 1446 of 2010 Between: G.Ramesh, S/o Late G.Subba Rao, R/o Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 AGAPE HELPING MINSTERIES, rep. by its General Secretary, C.Benjamin, S/o Chinnappa, by procession Advocate, R/o Hyderabad, the Administrative Office, Plot No. 382, Aparajitha Colony, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Registered Owner - -of the Vehicle bearing No. AP10 DT-T/R 6952, Chasis No. MA1 TB2 HAN2D7 4590 Engine No. HA 84 Dl 4614, Scorpio 7 sea 2 Sub- Inspector of Police, Chilakaluripet Town PS., Chilakaluripet, Guntur district. 3 Dodde Ronald D Ernest, S/o Earnest Gabrial, R/o Chilakanagar, Uppal, Hyderabad. 4 Putchakayala Papa Rao, S/o Satyanarayana, Venturur Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the order pass in Crl.MP.No. 2524 of 2009 and 1404 of 2009 in CC.No. 48 of 2009 on the file of the Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Chilakaluripet, Dt. 08-09-2009 as unjust, arbitrary illegal. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 1446 of 2010 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. In the circumstances, the petitioner is directed deposit the crime vehicle before the trial court within a week from today. The crime vehicle shall be kept in court custody till the disposal of the case, in which the said vehicle is involved or till any other order is passed by the trial court about the vehicle in any petition to be filed by any other concerned party. 3. With the directions as above the petition is disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. February 22, 2010. *BVS