1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3504 OF 2010 (Sureshchandra K. Agrawal vs. Mathadhipati Udasin Math) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 14, 2010. Heard Shri Kotwal, learned counsel for the petitioner/ respondent in Regular Civil Appeal and Shri Gaikwad, learned counsel for the respondent / appellant. The anxiety of Shri Kotwal, learned counsel seems to be about the change in nature because of addition of word registered and he states that if the petitioner is permitted to raise all necessary defences in this respect by effecting consequential amendment, the petitioner's interest will be safeguarded. It is apparent that when amendment is allowed in appeal, the petitioner who is respondent therein has got right to raise all necessary and appropriate defences to meet such challenge. In view of this, I find that the anxiety as expressed is misconceived. No prejudice is caused to the petitioner in any way. Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.