IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19443 of 2010 Naresh Choudhary, Son of Chhedi Choudhary, resident of Village- Makhdumpur, Police Station-Alipur, District-Gaya -- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 27-05-2010 Heard Sri Manish Kumar No.2, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. The sole petitioner, apprehending his arrest in connection with Alipur P.S. Case No.22 of 2009, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. Short fact of the case is that on the basis of fardbeyan of one Nagendra Sharma, the aforesaid F.I.R. was registered for the offences under Sections 341,147,148,337,429,348,324,307,379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the aforesaid fardbeyan , it was disclosed that while the informant along with his nephew was going on his Hero Honda Motorcycle he met with an accident with a girl and thereafter he was apprehended by all nine named accused persons and more than 15 other unknown accused persons and thereafter all the accused persons brutally assaulted the informant and his nephew. On this allegation, the F.I.R. was lodged. Sri Manish Kumar No.2, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, while pressing this petition for grant of anticipatory bail, submits that it is the case of informant himself that the occurrence had taken place after he met with an accident. 2 He further submits that other two accused persons having similar allegation have already been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc.No.42307 of 2009 and Cr.Misc.No. 15488 of 2010. Accordingly, in the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the petitioner may also be extended to the same privilege of anticipatory bail. Sri Atul Chandra, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer of the petitioner. However, he is not in a position to distinguish the case of this petitioner with other two accused persons, who have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail. In view of the facts and circumstances, as indicated above, particularly in view of the fact that two other accused persons having similar allegation have already granted privilege of anticipatory bail , let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Alipur P.S. Case No.22 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure . NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J )