IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2011 / 6TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20610 of 2011(A) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. N.MOHAMMED, NARANGAL HOUSE KADAVATHOOR PO, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. P.K.PAREED,PALORAKATHKANDI HOUSE ELANGOT PO, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. K.P.MOHAMMED, S/O.KADAR KATTIKAPPEDIKAYIL HOUSE, CHOKLI PO. 4. P.K.ABDULLA, PALORAKATHKANDI HOUSE ELANGOT PO, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD DISTRICT 673 121. 4. THE TAHSILDAR SULTHAN BATHERY, WYNAD DISTRICT 673 592. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 20610/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LAND SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LAND SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LAND SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LAND SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. P5: THE REPORT OF THE COLLECTOR DATED 28/12/1998 IN RESPECT OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER. P6: COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE COLLECTOR IN RESPECT OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P7: COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 28/02/1998 OF THE COLLECTOR IN RESPECT OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE COLLECTOR THE 3RD PETITIONER. P8: COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE COLLECTOR IN RESPECT OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER. P9: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/09/1999 IN W.A. 2066/1999. P10: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.(MS)NO.368/2000/REV. DATED 07/12/2000 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P11: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18/07/2008 IN R.P.NO.732/2008. P12: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 BY THE PETITIONER. P13: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29/09/2009 IN O.P.NO.5547/2001. P14: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28/07/2010 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. P15: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29/07/2010 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR SULTHAN BATHERY DIRECTING THE PETITIONERS THEREIN TO REMIT THE AMOUNT IN THE VILLAGE OFFICE. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.20610 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioners claim to be the purchasers of different extent of property pursuant to the sale agreement executed in 1995. However, since patta in respect of land was not issued, they made Ext.P1 to P4 applications for assignment of the respective portion of the land purchased. On the applications so made by them reports were sent by the District Collector to the Land Revenue Commissioner. Copies of reports are Exts.P5 to P8. Subsequently, pursuant to Ext.P9 judgment passed by this Court, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P10 order. 2. According to the petitioner, despite Ext.P10 order since the land value was not accepted, they have submitted Ext.P12 to the District Collector complaining of the above and requesting for taking appropriate action in the matter. This representation also remains unattended. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed. W.P(C) No.20610 of 2011 2 3. At present the grievance will be redressed if the 3rd respondent takes action on Ext.P12 representation which has been filed in the situation as narrated above. 4. In that view of the matter, without expressing anything on merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent shall take action on Ext.P12 if the same has been received and is pending. This the 3rd respondent shall do as as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge W.P(C) No.20610 of 2011 3