^^^'>^C^^'^^^V^V-^^^-^^^^^^'^^^^'^'v'l-'rv'^v^^ IN TOE M R HIGH COURT OFJUDICOTURE. ATJABAU3UR. wiap^tofii^l^to SSSXQ. Bodh Singh Thakur S/o A.S.Thakur agetA about 35; years R/o Vill: Binjhara/ Tahsil: Katghora/Dj.stt: Korba, M.P. 1. Goveriu^ent :ofiMadhya-tp2^adeshthyough; itf s Chtef secretary^ Vallabh Bhawan/ Bhopal, M/P. 2< Soi£fch .Easfcern Coalfields^ Lim.ifced, Through |itrs"l^Chairman' Cum Managing Di.rector^j SEGL Hqsy Seepath Road, Bilaspur^i M.P.; . ]• 3. Chief General | Managejr^ Gevra Ar<&a of South .. Eastern. Coalfielcisi .Liinited, P.O.Gevra Project, Da-stt: Korba., W.P. V/A 226 OS S?BB <^8STI3?CWION CXF INDI&. The Petifcioner do hereby inost respectfuliy begs to submit as under :- i ^^w-^m'. ^m ^ GG^i®,ll®g:Ki iia'^.ii^a,^ l _ _. ...; - : i»SSSBSmWiK^mi^sSV^ '• f: '," ' ';; ::::::! ;%g?ii&, M«lg :,::»^Iwr ',¥s.» it»i::gt,a.:@ttfi»a Slari Ra^kumar Sir?gh, learu©dcotuisel f^ n-fct-fc^t.taw, S&RSWe;o%i|^ned eouasel <°'• '•WO^ent nc. :,pT,i'^:,fta^^l^rnel.@:^^ -::CP&SSi®<ll:.;:;@»I:^!'(^@|a|@,) /®r';t»£^fi«^@B.:-^^^^ .^^^a,the:.ye^^^^ valtiity .a^.yrop-t.^y.o^ tto,4^^to^-^^^to^^ 'fe^,^,,^ •to;,l^,^@mitti%.hlm.t©'H^ergo-tMe:^t^ '^m^^iimi^^^ff^^^^^^^ :-1:..':'-./<....-..-:^ ,.'^):.,.^^ w^^'miiy^^ •3.a^,^plled'for,.l^'^©ppolntee^;t© ^o.i^.their.tum.'ia^^^ .tJae^p^,i@.tie^^ ^:ett^o:^r a^^:;:s©^,-t^ 'the traini^. w go ^^ ''^^^i<>^'^^^ .tliat,.Iie'd©es,.^temr^,^ 'ii^i.^i^^ii^^^^ '.13:)::-::|l|j'^ ::i^;©^.:l^le^.op(i^,^t,.^ ^p@^ent,o^<ter,^ j^:,,Qaffl::f1|j,»|^^^ :.^i«»^itia.^aa^^^ "Ws", 'iSS ;ilfc w^ ^-.:^.- ••2 •< th^a^ ©iisteea^ ^^ ^ tMe ^^it^a@r.^s^^^^^ Accordi^ t©tMe respQ^en-fcs »s. 2^3, Wder iimexure l{/1,®,ieMlmi.iteind DevaEigaK was %p©ii2teAaadBMer Anaexure R/t, the services o£ the petitime^eTe N.g»3.y tepmiBated* 4) SubiaissioGS of the learned comisel f©rthe petitioner are that appointmeiat under Annexure R/1 itself could not be treated to be fiml and in a]ay ease aii enqiilry ought t© Mave beeaaade iM^pese^e ofthe ye-titiQtaep af^er giving lals^^^sr/ notiee aal pro^er ogportu^ty to r^peseiat his case and cause. Hesabmits tMat almipt termlmtion of his serolces is bad. Learned ©ouaself©rre%@2ul@ffifes aos. 2 and 3 sulaits ^at in aecordance wlAIi ttoe amoi^- ffieiit order they were e^fcttled to make engulry aiid even otlaerwise, they eould termlaate the serviees @f the ^etitloiier. Om bei^ asked by the Court as to wiielteer the enqpiry was aade in ppesen©eo.C tlie petitioBer or not an€wlietlier the petitioaer was issaed any show cause a@tiee bef@re fais teriBittati@n, ttie learne<a comsel £©r responde^s nos. tam 3 a^-ter goiiag ttoeugii ttoe retwn. was a^Me -to Goirbe^-feMa-fc eitiaer ttee oaquiry was made tn p3neseia@e ©.fttoe peti.-fcj.Q^er @r any show caiise iiotiee was Assued t©tbe ggtltloaep, 3) I have heard the partiesa €) Itee v@ry ba%j,e principle ©fnaturaB ^ustlce i.e., 'auei aXteraa p.art^* presses iiifco service two requireme^s? ^m^r^^i^o^^all^^^^^^^ seeoNily, ^J^:.o;Me.;;^|.l.,1a:e,^a;-3^^^^ priQ^ILe i&tt eover ^^aA®its siseep t^ «& oi-ter agaiiast tfae l»|r^@f sweoiie, ^em^^i^s^s ;3yope:st^,,Ao^^ te:'a:xy:.^ase::;:;:sra^:-^ f^v ^- .3 representation < 7) In the preseirt oase> it was maxid.a'fcory iqpoa the resp©^dentsmos. 2 ajEid 5 to issue notice t©the petiti©Mer reqLUirijqg him t©sh©wcause as to why ia view ©fthe appoiKtment ol Balmula.iiad Bevangaia as noainee o£ the origiaal recerded M0lder, his ap^oiMfcBeiicfc be not termiMated^ They ^rere also required to iBjCerm the petitioner that they were placing reliance upon Annexure R/1» Tfaey were also requiree to give some oppertuiiity to the i>etitioner so that he,if wanted, e©Mldsatisfy the respendents Wfs. 2 aiid 5 tMat appoiirtment of BalBi^toiiiad ©evaiiganwas illegal and in fact, the order of appointmeitt issiaed in his favoT^r ^as i^ accordance with law^ 8) It is trite law that i£ there are statutory rules then the same are required to be observed, but in absence of certain statutory rules, regulations, direetions or the pelicies, the prind.pl esof natural oustice are required t©be followedl because they always play a vital role and at least control the whim, caprice a^d arbitrariness ©£ the person in authority. Etobody knows that i£proper ©ppor-fcuiiitywas givea to the petitloaeTt wtoiat would have tee@Ei -fehe resialt^ He oould a^pear teefore the respondents nos. 2 and 5 and satisfy them* It is a different thing tfaat he could or could w>t satisfy the respQ^deDts nos, 2 and 3, but lae was cer&aiHly entiiled to notice and an opportiiMty to mee't the charges or tfae allegations raised by respoBdents nos» 2 @2&€ 3^ 9) As the order AiaiiexuLre R/2 is the result ©fpro- ce<lure Mnkiaown to law, the same des^rves to and is aecopd.tsgly qu^slaed, I]ae re,^oii<ieats are free to mak® ^,1 '"fc aiii e^q^ix^y Crt@ ttoe Q^^<^ ef "fche petitl^^e^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Balmukund ©ewaiagan,after givizig l>r©geropporteuit^y ^t^ R81-' •• 4 ,. only to the petitioner but also $@ the said Balmukund ©ewangan, because if in thls eiaqyiry ultimately the petitioner succeeds, then tMe said BalmukiaMd Dewa^gan wouM be removed^ The petition is allowed. No cosjss. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice P8BT ^