THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.5996 of 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 19.09.2009, passed by the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad, in I.A.No.1052 of 2009 in O.S.No.1265 of 2008. The petitioner-plaintiff filled the suit seeking perpetual injunction against the respondent in respect of the suit schedule mulgi and got himself examined as PW.1 and marked Exs.A1 to A10. While so, he filed the present application under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC to receive the certified copies of the sale deed, dated 05.09.1966, and Trust Deed, dated 28.02.1974, stating that those documents are necessary to prove his case. The first respondent filed counter opposing the application and contending that the petitioner filed the present application at a belated stage with a mala fide intention to drag on the proceedings. The trial Court, after taking into consideration the material available on record, observed that the documents sought to be received i.e., sale deed, dated 05.09.1966 and trust deed, dated 28.02.1974, are the documents registered much prior to the institution of the suit and except stating that those documents are with the proposed witness, no cogent reasons were assigned by the petitioner as to why he could not file them at the time of filing the suit and accordingly, dismissed the application. Hence, the present civil revision petition. Heard the learned counsel and perused the material on record. As can be seen from the material available on record, especially the affidavit filed in support of the present application, I.A.No.1052 of 2009, it is clear that no reason whatsoever has been assigned by the petitioner for not filing the documents sought to be received now, at the time of filing the suit, though they are registered very much prior to the institution of the suit. The trial Court, after considering the rival contentions, has rightly dismissed the application and this Court discerns no infirmity whatsoever in the impugned order warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:04.02.2010 VGB