C.R.No.5000 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. C.R.No.5000 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 5.10.2011 Sant Lal ...Petitioner vs Jagdish ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. --- Present: Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Amit Kohar,Advocate, for the respondent. -- Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) This is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned order of eviction passed by the authorities below. On 19.8.2011, the following order was passed by this Court. “Learned counsel for the petitioner do not press the revision petition, however, he submits that some time may be granted to vacate the premises. So, notice of motion for 11.11.2011. In the meantime, dispossession of the petitioner shall remain stayed on clearing the arrears of rent within 15 days from today” Shri Sumeet Mahajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent landlord has submitted before this Court that the petitioner be given a reasonable time to hand over the vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the landlord. After discussion a consensus has been reached between the C.R.No.5000 of 2011 (O&M) 2 counsel for the parties and on the basis of that consensus it is agreed that petitioner be granted time upto 20.5.2012 to vacate the demised premises and hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent landlord. Statement of the petitioner has been recorded separately. In view of the statement/undertaking made by the petitioner before this Court and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed with the observations that the petitioner is granted time upto 20.5.2012 to vacate the premises in dispute and hand over the vacant possession to the landlord subject to payment of arrears, if any, within two months from today and that he will keep on paying future monthly rent in advance by 10th of every month till the date vacant possession of demised premises is handed over to the respondent landlord. In case of non payment of rent as aforesaid, the eviction order will become operative immediately. It may also be clarified that the petitioner will be bound by his statement made before this Court today, to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the landlord on the expiry of the stipulated period i.e 20.5.2012 and in case of his failure to do so in addition to the execution of the eviction order the respondent-landlord shall also be entitled to initiate contempt proceedings against the petitioner. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge October 5, 2011 rk