1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5767 OF 2006 (Farook Haroon Chini .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Agnihotri, Advocate holding for Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri J.B. Jaiswal, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri A.S. Manohar, Advocate for the respondent No.4. CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 16TH OCTOBER, 2008 1. Shri Agnihotri, the learned Counsel holding for Shri Anand Parchure, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, prays for adjournment on the ground that the learned Counsel for the petitioner is busy in another Court. The prayer is rejected. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. 3. The license under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 was granted to respondent No.4 by respondent No.2/Collector, Yavatmal on 30.07.2005. The present writ petition challenging the very grant of license was filed on 30.08.2006 on the ground that the shop is situated near a School and a Jain Temple. 4. Section 56 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 2 1949, provides for cancellation of the license for any cause other than those specified in Section 54 of the said Act. It seems that the petitioner has not availed of that remedy. He approached this Court without exhausting the remedy for cancellation of the license available under Section 56 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.