IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1650 OF PETITION NO.1650 OF PETITION NO.1650 OF 2006 Mr.Satinder s/o.Trilochansingh Nanda..Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr. Kiran Hemani & Ors.............Respondents Mr. R.N.Kachave,for the petitioner Mr.Tushar Bhavsar i/b.Manoj Bhat for Respondent Nos.1,2,4 to 6. Mr. K.R. Belosey, Government Pleader for respondent No.3. Mr. G.D.Utangale, for Respondent No.7. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 18TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . The S.R.A. Scheme is in progress. 252 eligible hutment dwellers whose name appeared in Annexure II have already been given permanent accommodation. Other 210 persons whose name appear in Annexure II are in transit accommodation and will have to be rehabilitated in terms of the SRA scheme. In these circumstances the grievance of the petitioner cannot be gone into in the exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction. We are further informed that the petitioner’s application for being accommodated in the scheme has been rejected. Considering the above this will not be a fit case for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction. It will be open to the petitioner, if he has got any other remedy to pursue such remedy. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J).