CWP(T) No.6900 of 2008(OA No.3034/2000 28.8.2009 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. A.G. and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant A.G. for the respondents. It is the case of the petitioner that he joined as lower division clerk with respondents at Mandi in the year 1962 and Army during the period of emergency in the year 1965 and at that time assurance was given to him that after relieving from Army he can come back in the civil employment. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he was discharged from the Army in the year 1986 on medical grounds. The petitioner remained under treatment from the year 1986 to 1994. The petitioner made representations to the authorities in the year 1994 and thereafter for giving civil employment to petitioner but his representations were not decided. In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer and stated that petitioner may be permitted to file fresh representation to respondent No.2, who may be directed to decide the same within fixed time. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation and therefore, respondent No.2 may also be directed to take into consideration this aspect also while granting relief, if any to the petitioner. The prayer of learned counsel for petitioner has not been opposed by learned Sr. Addl. Advocate General. Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to file a representation to respondent No.2 setting out his complete case within a period of two weeks from today with certified copy of this order and the respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law in further period of six weeks with speaking order. The respondent No.2 shall take into consideration the fact that petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation while deciding the representation of petitioner. The liberty is given to the petitioner to approach appropriate Court, if decision on his representation goes against him. Copy Dasti on usual charges ( Kuldip Singh ) Judge. August 28, 2009 (sks)