\‘\ é *Qiw /, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) $343 PETITIONERS WRIT PETITION (CEIO. /, /2007 : LManak lal rathi s/o lateShri Hasthi Mal rathi, aged about 75 years, resident ! i ofVillage Saja, Tahsil Saja, District Durg QCG). 2. §nt Hemin bai joshi w/o shri Har prasad joshi aged about 70 years r/o Village Saja Tahsil Saja District Durg VERSUS RESPONDENTS f, : 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Public Works Department & V Administration D.K.S. WBhavan Raipur (C.G.) a 2 Sub Divisional Officer Public Work Department Saja Sub Divisional Saja /Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3 Executive Engineer Public Work Department Bemetara ,Division Bemetara we Distt. Durg 4 Sub Divisional Officer ~/ Saja Distt. Durg 5. Nagar Panchayat, Saja, through its President, Nagar Panchayat Saja , District Durg (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. MW WW WW W K) N“ $313 mm mm (Wu) HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 4790 of2007 Present: Ms. Renu Kochara, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ’ Shri Y.S. Thakur, Advocate for the respondent N‘agar Panchayat, Saja. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 5 day of August, 2010) W.P. (C) Nos. 4790, 5143, 5343 & 5959 of 2007, involve the same question of law and common facts and, as such, they are being disposed of by this co on order. Challenge in these batch of petitions is that pursuant to the gemral notice published in the news paper on 30//07/2007, the respondent Nagar Panchayat is proceeding to demarcate the property and thereafter, demolish the structure in dispute. Shri Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Nagar Panchayat, fairly submits that pursuant to the notice, no steps have been initiated to demolish any structure except demarcation for the purpose of widening of road. Learned counsel further submits that if Nagar Panchayat takes decision to demolish the structure of the petitioners, they would be ah‘orded an opportunity ofhearing by issuing a show cause notice and after hearing their respective cases. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in these petitions for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of: Sdl - ott" sh K- Agni“ Gowri Safl Judge PETITIONERS : Santosh Devi & Anothex VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others And W.P. (C) Nos. 5 143, 5343 & 5959 0f200'l PE ON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONS ON SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J.