IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 21349 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.09.2011 Paramjit Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Premjit S. Hundal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing of notice of motion on 18.07.2011, it was noticed that the FIR was registered on account of family dispute, which has been settled. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already joined investigation. On 06.09.2011, learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Mehar Singh, had stated that the petitioner had already joined in- vestigation and her custodial interrogation is not required, however, the pe- tition was adjourned for hearing due to typographical error in the memo of parties. The same has been corrected today. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the peti- tioner on 18.07.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 16.09.2011 sharmila