IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.726 of 2009 SHABNAM ARA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 29.01.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 13.12.2008 which states that the recognition granted to the institution by order dated 4.9.1997 for the sessions 1979-81 to 1994-96 was under contemplation for cancellation. Learned Counsel contends that by reason of such an order candidates who have obtained their training qualifications for appointment as teachers are proposed to be shut out from such consideration for appointment. On record is an order of the Supreme Court dated 21.11.2008 in SLP (Civil) No. 19147-19148 of 2008 challenging the orders passed in LPA No.99/2007 and MJC No. 1590/2008. It appears that the order dated 13.12.2008 is a sequel to the disposal of the LPA and the MJC applications by this Court. The situation now fundamentally changes by virtue of the order of the Supreme Court dated 21.11.2008. The State respondents are therefore obliged under law to act in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court. To that extent the order dated 13.12.2008 in so far as the petitioner’s institution is concerned is not sustainable. In any event there is no order of cancellation of the recognition till date. No prohibitory orders can be passed on a contemplated action which may or may not fructify. That issue shall have to abide by the final orders that may be passed by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid SLP. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)