IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No. : 304 of 2002. Decided on: 10.08.2010. _________________________________________________________ Kumari Nidhi Kochhar and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Smt. Sulochna Devi and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. Hoshiar Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For respondent No. 2. : Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the proposed L.Rs. of deceased respondent No. 1. None for other respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): C.M.P.(M) No. 665 of 2008. Heard. Allowed. The delay in filing the application for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 1 is condoned. The application stands disposed of. C.M.P.(M) No. 727 of 2008. Heard. Allowed. The legal representatives/L.Rs. of deceased respondent No. 1, as mentioned in Para No. 2 of the application are permitted to be brought on record. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary corrections in the memo of parties. The application stands disposed of. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. Civil Revision No. : 304 of 2002. Mr. Hoshiar Kaushal, learned vice counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, is vacated. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 10, 2010. (bhupender)