IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16508 of 2009 RAVINDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 12.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner was an applicant under Advertisement No. 2 of 2004 for appointment in BMP 4 Dumrao. The Medical Board has found him unfit allegedly on the ground of defect in vision. No copy of the report has been annexed. The petitioner claims to have had himself examined by a Medical Board at the Sadar Hospital on 10.11.2009 and has represented again. He therefore prays that the matter may be disposed off in terms of certain similar directions by this Court in CWJC Nos. 10538 and 10844 of 2009 for medical reassessment of his fitness. Learned Counsel for the State urges that defect in vision may have serious implications for one who is asked to discharge duties in a uniformed force. If the petitioner represents his claim for re-examination let the respondents do so at his cost within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order before them and decide the matter afresh by a reasoned and speaking order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)