1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 181/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4018/2008 SHRI JAYANT PANJBRAO JAYBHAYE ..vs .. STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.J.J.Chandurkar, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.Mujumdar, AGP, for R-1 Mr.Aditya Deshpande, Adv. for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 12 th MARCH, 2010. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 files a Pursis signed by Respondent No.2 stating that, by the transfer order dated 10 th March, 2010, he has complied with the order dated 21 st October, 2008 passed in Writ Petition No. 4018/2008. The direction was expected to be complied soon after the receipt of representation from the 2 petitioner. The representation was given by the petitioner on 26.03.2009. Respondent no.2, however, took no action on the representation for almost an year. The action is taken only after the petitioner filed the present contempt petition and respondent no.2 was compelled to appear before the Court pursuant to the notice issued in the contempt petition. In the circumstances, though the respondent no.2 has purged the act of contempt, the petitioner will be entitled to the costs of the present petition. The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to pay costs quantified at Rs.10,000/-. The costs to be paid within a period of two weeks from today. If the costs are not paid within the time granted, the Collector shall recover the same as arrears of land revenue and pay to the petitioner. JUDGE. Rvjalit