v\ cMgD (D IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. «729‘1/01? 2010. VERSUS RESPONDENTS /, '1. . State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) / 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) // 3 iBlock Education-Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, District Kanker, (C.G.) z WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER /f Naveen Kumar Sinha, aged about 38 years, S/o. Shri \0 Vishnu Prasad, Upper DivisiOn (xgw Teacher, Govt. Middle School {KW Q§:§;(L\N\\\\\Q M‘ohpur, Block-Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) Mmmma WW 3.3.: H N m ‘ 33-12—2D10: v Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. for the State, Submits that the petitioner is rements on account of he having passed B.’I‘.I.. examination before ‘s appointment at his own cost. it is submitted that the issue invoi ed in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finaliy decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case f Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & 01's. 2009 {ImMPJR tSC) 59. is Court has also takeo a similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 assed in W.P.(S) No. 6257f2008. Counsel for the petitioners furth r submits that the order dated , 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appea NO. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Suprem Oourt in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by th's Court in another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issL‘ ed for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pieaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the samerlines. / In View of ab’o/ve, the ’pegiticn is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the ciaim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition Within a pedod of eight weeks from today. [113% E195“? Shri Vaibhew Goverdhan, PL Counsel for the petitioner entitled to benefit of two advance i it is further submitted that 311w m w.‘.gas...y>m7.,.9\,95wt (3° 111 200 m