IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 22448 of 2002 Between: 1 M.Laxmamma W/o. late M.Gandaiah R/o. H.No. 4-52/2, Old Bownapalli, Secunderabad. 2 K.Savithri W/o. Narasinga Rao D/o. Late Mulugu Gandaiah R/o. 1-8-920, Siramnagar Colony, Nallakunta, Hyderabad-44. 3 Md. Bagya W/o. Md. Ahmed D/o. Ltae Mulugu Gandaiah, R/o. 4-52/2, Old Bowenpalli, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 M.Narasimha Rao S/o. Veeraiah R/o. 8-4-97, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad. 4 M.Swamy S/o. Veeraiah R/o. 7-85/1, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad11. 5 M.Balaiah S/o. Veeraiah R/o. H.No.62, Sanjeevaiah Nagar Colony, China Thokata, New Bowenpally, Secunderabad. 6 M.Lingam S/o. Veeraiah R/o. 8-3-430/94, Ambedkar Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring respondents herein in without considering the claim of the petitioners declaring the petitioners land in Sy.Nos.43, 44, 57 and 58 of Old Boinapally V, Secunderabad as surplus Vide the order dt. 23.4.1990, which was confirmed by the 1st respondent, vide Appeal Proceedings Nos. HYD/288&56/96 in Dt. 27.7.2002 as illegal, unjust and contrary to U.L.C.Act and as such liable to be se aside in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Oral order: The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter dated 24-4- 2009 before the Registry seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 28th April, 2009. GRR