's “ma ‘nZr‘ On due consnderatlon the Court below has dismissed the appeai med against - the dismissal of grant of Injunction passed by tm Civil Judge Class-ll Takhatpur 5. Order impugned cleariy raveais that there is only dispute relating fin damarcation or iocal inspection by appomtment of a Commissionerg 6. At this stage counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner want to me appropriate petition before the tnal Court for tocal inspection in terms of l Order 26 Rule 9 of the C P C 7. Coneidering the aforesaid request and order impugned the petition is dismissed However the petitioner may tile appropnate petition before the v trial Court for demarcation of the land by appointment of a Commissioner No order as to costs Sd/- T.P Sharma Judge Bl- .