— IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. / 2008 PETITIONER o Lakshman Singh Chandrakar S/o Shri ...• ^ Chandrakar, y\ged about 46 years, ...^ui." Occupation- Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Gaya Nagar, Distt. Durg (C.G.) .y .^ l^^ ^- •y\p^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur (CG) 3. 4. District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) The Principal, Govt. Middle School Gaya Nagar Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WntPetitionISLNo. 5824 of 2008 Petitioaer Lakshmait Singh Chandrakar Versus Respondents State of ClLhattisgarh & others (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agirihotri J.) Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the respondenls. 3. 4. 5. Thakur Heard. O R DE R (Ordl (Passed on fhis 12th day of March, 2010) Learued counsel appearing for fhe petitioner subiaits that by the itapugned order dated 3.9.2008 (Aniiexure P/1) fhe proinotion order offhe petitioner dated 18.8.2008 from the post ofAssistaat Teacher/Head Master to fhe post ofUpper Division Teacher, was canceUed without affordiag an opporturdty of hearmg to the petitioner. Learued counsel appearuig for fhe respondents/State iiefers to the order dated 25th February, 2009 (Aniiexure R-3), passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 6490/2008 (R. L. Rathore Vs. State GoverDinent of Chliatisgarh & aaother) and subniits fhat a show cause notice is required to be issued, caUiag upon fhe petitioner to file reply fhereon. The impugned order inay be treated as recaUed. Learaed counsel appearing for the respondeuts/State further submits fhat a fresh order would be passed after considering fhe reply to the show cause notice, filed by the petitioner, ia accordaiice wifh law, as the impugned order stands recaUed pzirsuant to fhe show cause notice issued to the petitioner. In view of the foregoiag, according to leamed counsel appeariag for the petitioner, nothiag survives ia this petition for adjudication.. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed ofwith fhe afore-stated liberty. No order as to costs. ,' „ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri