1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO.18 OF 2006 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.939 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1857 OF 2004 Shiv Singh Kandhari Appellant vs. Vinod Kumar Surajbali Dubey Respondent Mr.M.P.Vashi i/b.M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the appellant. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 27th January 2006 P.C. Heard Mr.M.P.Vashi, the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. No case for interference is made out in the impugned order. 3. Appeal is dismissed in limine. (R. (R. (R. M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) M. LODHA, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)