IN THE HIGH OCURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 919 of 2008 (M/S) Indra Singh. ……….. Petitioner Versus Kedar Singh & others. ………. Respondents Mr. Mangal Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Both the courts below have found against the petitioner concurrently. Both the courts have taken a view that the injunction sought by the petitioner cannot be granted in his favour because the respondents have a right of way. The suit is still pending. The observations made by both the courts below were only for the limited purpose of disposing of temporary injunction application. Those observations shall not be construed as any expression of opinion with respect to the final outcome of the suit, which shall be disposed of by the trial court on its own merits and in accordance with law. As far as this Court is concerned, it is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 13.06.2008 G