1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L.)NO. 31 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (L) NO. 110 OF 2009 IN Court Receiver’s Report No. 37 of 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2429 OF 1997 Smt. Pushpa T. Kadambande .. Review Petitioner/Appellant. (Org.Applicant/Tenant) V/s. 1. Naina Deepak Kamani & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mr. H.S. Chandnani i/by Lexim Associates for the Review Petitioner. Ms. Sheetal Kumar i/by M.M. Patel & Co. for Respondent No.1. --- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2009 P.C. : We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner. The review is neither within the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code nor does it claim any relief which can be granted in exercise of review jurisdiction of this court. The contention raised before us is that the Court Receiver has acted in 2 a manner which is not permitted under the order of the Court. Even if that be so, Review is not maintainable. Hence, dismissed as such. CHIEF JUSTICE Dr. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.