IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20300 of 2010 SMT.RAJKUMARI DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 03.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the State points out from Annexure 1 dated 9.11.2010 that despite repeated opportunities the petitioner was not responding to the show cause notice calling her explanation. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall file her reply to the same. If sufficient opportunity had been given to the petitioner which she did not avail of the Court is not persuaded to interfere with the order dated 9.11.2010. What the petitioner may propose or may not propose do hereinafter is for the petitioner to decide upon which the Court makes no observation. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)