IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No. 7465/2009 Bhag Chand & ors. vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 05.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Mahendra Shandilya, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of third bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Shri Mahendra Shandilya Advocate on behalf of the applicants pertaining to F.I.R. No. 196/08 at police station Sarwar, District Ajmer, in the offences under Sections 143, 341, 323 and later on 307 of IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petitioners have been in custody for quite a long time and the case is pending trial which shall take time, hence, they may be granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material on record, it is noticed that the injured Rukma is found to have sustained five fractures, such as on hand, leg, 4th, 5th and 6th ribs which were described by the Medical Jurist to be dangerous to her life. These injuries are alleged to have been caused by the petitioners. As per the statements of PW-2 Rukma, the petitioner Devi is alleged to have caused an injury on her head, which is, ofcourse described to have been simple in nature by the Medical Jurist, however, keeping in view the overall injuries sustained by the injured Rukma, I do not find any good reason to change my earlier view and this third bail petition also deserves to be dismissed for those very reason enumerated in first and the second bail order dated 22nd October, 2008 and 16th January, 2009. 6. In the result, the third bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioners stands dismissed. 7. However, keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of four months, as the petitioners are in custody for the last one year. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. Mak/- 28