1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2009 (MAHESH HIRANAND LALWANI VS. STATE OF MAH. & 4 OTH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Nitin Lalwani, Advocate for applicant. Shri M.I.Dhatrak, Advocate for Respondents No.2 to 5. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : MARCH 31, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This revision application is directed against judgment of acquittal rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharkawada (Kelapur), whereby the learned Judge acquitted respondent of offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. There is no doubt that the victim had committed suicide, but apart from this, as rightly pointed by the learned trial Judge, nothing has been brought on record to show that the victim was subjected to any ill-treatment. All the contentions raised by the 2 learned counsel for the applicant are inferential in nature and there is no concrete evidence which could have led the learned Judge to render a judgment of conviction. 3. Since the judgment does not indicate any error requiring correction in exercise of revisional jurisdiction, the revision is rejected. JUDGE RR.