1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2007 Thakur Dinesh Kumar. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...... .... Respondents. Mr. Keswani i/by Mr. Amit Seth for the Petitioner. Mr. R. Raghuwanshi, Addl. Solicitor General, for Respondent No.1. Mr. D. A.Nalawade, Govt. Pleader for Respondent No.2. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED : 13TH MARCH, 2008. P. C.: The petitioner was aggrieved by a letter issued to him for exhibiting the film by the respondents on a condition that he should get a `No Objection Certificate' from Smt. Sonia Gandhi as the film was based on Smt. Sonia Gandhi's personal life. On last occasion, the learned Additional Solicitor General sought time to get instructions. He has submitted that the Censor Board is withdrawing the letter. However, the Censor Board would like to have a fresh inquiry to verify the authenticity of the facts as shown in the film under Section 41(4)(a) of the Cinematograph Rules, 1983 but there will not be any necessity to get `No Objection Certificate' from 2 Smt.Sonia Gandhi. 2. There was another requirement in the impugned letter that the petitioner should get a `No Objection Certificate' from the Animal Welfare Board regarding use of Dog in the film. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would delete the scenes in which the Dog was appearing. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains in the writ petition and the same is disposed of as such. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (S. A. BOBDE, J.)