IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9589 of 2009 Date of Decision: September 22, 2010 Mahabir Singh and others. …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajive Kumar Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that impugned notices had already been withdrawn vide order dated 21.09.2010, hence, present writ petition has rendered infructuous. He has placed photocopies of the orders dated 21.09.2010 and the same may be kept on record. C.W.P. No. 9589 of 2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent no.2, wants not to press this petition. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 22, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2