wp3158­11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3158 OF 2011 Laxman B. Sambari & Ors ..Petitioners versus The Administrator & Divisional Commissioner & Ors ..Respondents Mr.Y.E.Mooman i/by Manisha B. Gawade for the petitioners. Mr.S.N.Bhosle, A.G.P for respondent No.1. Mr.Prashant Naik for respondent No.3. Ms.Sheetal Aangane with Mr.Mohanish Chauhan i/by Divya Shah Associates for respondent No.4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 15th July 2011. P.C.: . When this matter was placed before me, my attention was invited to an common order dated 13th June 2011 passed in Writ Petition Nos.4195/2011, 4219/2011 and 4013/2011. It is contended that the cause of action in the present petition is also arising within the Greater Bombay Municipal Limits, as notified in the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules and, wp3158­11.doc 2 therefore, all petitions be heard on the Original Side and particularly to avoid conflicting orders. The order is pointed out to me by Mr.Naik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Society and the developer. 2 In these circumstances, Mr.Mooman appearing on behalf of the petitioners prays for leave to withdraw this writ petition to file a fresh petition on Original Side of this Court, but, on the same cause of action and challenging the same orders with the same contentions and pleas. The request made by Mr.Mooman is reasonable. Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on the Original Side of this Court on the same cause of action. To enable Mr.Mooman to do so, the ad-interim order passed by this Court shall continue for a period of four weeks from today. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)