1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 240/2011 (JAISINGH INDERSINGH THAKUR VERSUS THE MANAGER M/S J.S. ENGINEERING & CONTRACTORS PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri D.A. Sonawane, counsel for the appellant. Shri K.J. Mahajan, counsel for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 10 , 2011 . We see nothing wrong in the judgment passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Yavatmal on 14.12.2009 rejecting the application filed by the appellant under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court found that the appellant had failed to lead the cogent evidence to prove that he was entitled to difference of minimum wages to the tune of Rs.2,95,896/-. The Labour Court also found that the appellant did not establish that he had worked overtime with the respondents and that an amount of Rs.10,50,000/- and odd was payable to the appellant for overtime work. Since the judgment passed by the Labour Court was just and proper and did not suffer from any perversity or serious error, the learned single Judge, by the order dated 23.11.2010, upheld the same. 2 We find that the letters patent appeal is devoid of merit and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE