(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.308 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.308 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.308 OF 2004 Smt. Shashikala Shripal Datmajage ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. N.J. Patil, counsel for Petitioner Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondents 1 to 4. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 15TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . In view of the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 189 of 2003 holding that the petitioner was not in possession of the subject plot, this Contempt Petition alleging violation of the status quo order in the said writ petition, does not survive. Hence, the petition is rejected as infrucutous.