THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.565 of 2010 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging disobedience of the directions issued by this Court in order, dated 03.07.2009 passed in WPMP.No.17093 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.13197 of 2009. In the Writ Petition, it is the case of the petitioners that they were granted house-site pattas and are in possession of the same pursuant to proceedings issued by the third respondent in Rc.136/93, dated 05.12.2000 and also in RCHA/389/2004, dated 14.04.2006. It is their case that in spite of the fact that they are in possession pursuant to grant of pattas, there is an attempt by the respondents for their eviction without passing any order. This Court by order, dated 03.07.2009 in WPMP.No.17093 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.13197 of 2009, directed the respondents not to evict the petitioners from their respective house-site properties granted in their favour vide proceedings referred to above. In this Contempt Case, it is the case of the petitioner that in spite of such a direction, the respondents deliberately violated the directions issued by this Court and evicted her. It is to be noticed that this Contempt Case is filed by the seventh petitioner in the Writ Petition against order, dated 03.07.2009 passed in WPMP.No.17093 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.13197 of 2009. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Tahsildar, Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District, while denying various allegations made by the petitioner, it is stated that so far as the petitioner herein is concerned, plot No.14 as claimed by her was not allotted to her. It is also stated that with regard to others also, the pattas granted were cancelled as they have violated the conditions of grant, in exercise of powers under Clause 15(12)(3)(d)(iii) of Board Standing Order. As the very grant of patta in favour of the petitioner is denied by the respondents in the counter-affidavit and in the absence of any material to prove that the petitioner is evicted after this Court passed orders, I do not find any merit in this Contempt Case. The Contempt Case is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th JULY, 2011. kvni