IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 1st day of June, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 542 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Raheesuddin .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of FIR No. 502/2009, U/s 498A/323/324/504/506/452 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition ACt, PS Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. June 01, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Gopal Krishan, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR are general in nature and the applicant is in jail since last more than one month. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Raheesuddin be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 1.6.2010 PRABODH