:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 75 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3053 OF 2004 Shabbir Ramzan Inamdar ..Petitioner vs. 1. Kadir Ramzan Inamdar and ors. ..Respondents Mr. A.M. Mulla for petitioner. Mr. A.R. Shaikh for respondent no.1. Mr. Dilip Bodake for respondent no.2. Ms. V. Mhaispurkar, AGP. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. B.H. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. Date Date Date : : : September 07, 2006. September 07, 2006. September 07, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. Perused the report submitted by the T.I.L.R. vide his letter dated 23/8/2006 addressed to the learned AGP. . It is clear that 1/7th share of each of seven share holders, after deducting the land that has gone in the road widening, comes to 64.81 sq.mtrs. . The decree under execution shall, therefore, :2: be passed in such a way that every share holder gets an area of 64.81 sq.mtrs. (equal share) and the decree is accordingly modified. The Executing Court to take appropriate steps as per the T.I.L.R.’s report. . Ad-interim stay stands vacated. . Review Petition disposed off accordingly. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)