w H!GH_COyRT,QF_CHHAntSGARH.AT.BJ.LA.SPUR WBnLPEI.mONlC)_No32ZLof.2W9 PET11 IONER : Jitendra Jain S/o Mahavir Prasad Jain, aaed about 42 years, Deshbhushan Steel Corporation, Teighani Naka, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Town & Country Planning, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The iViunicipai Corporation, Raipur, through: The Commissioner, Munic-ipal CorpQration, Raipur (C.G.) yTPEJjTjON_UNDERARI!CLEil260.FJME^QNSTriinTO^^^ SB:Hon'b!e_Shn_SatshKLA^nihotri,_J, Shri Goutam Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, GovemmentAdvocate forthe State/respondent No. i Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri J.K.Qupta, Advocate the respondent No. 2. ORDER (ORAQ (Passed on10'hdayoi Juiy, 2009) 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, sufamits friat the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merite at this stage, however, the respondents may be directed to consider and ctecide his representation in accordance with law. Shri Sao, learned counsei appearing for the State submitB that in the event, a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered and decided in Shri Agrav-'al, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that it is for the State/respondent No. 1 to decide the dispute as raised in the petition and the same may be considered by way of representation, if any, fiied by the petitioner. !n view of the above, the petition stands disposed of, as nothing remains for adjudication. The respondent-State is accordingty directed to consider and ^decide the representation of the petitioner, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge \