Crl.M.No.M-18624 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-18624 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 7, 2010 Ram Parshad .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.159, dated 11.4.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that FIR was got registered by Tehsildar-cum-Sub Registrar, Hisar, on the basis of enquiry conducted in the village by Naib Tehsildar (Accounts) and Virender Kumar, Kanungo/Halqa Patwari. Statements of number of villagers were recorded and hence, it was revealed that Dhoonger son of Khiva Ram and Chiana son of Keshu had left the village about 50 years ago and they were not seen in the village for the last 50 years and that there was no legal heir of Dhoonger and Chiana. However, sale-deed was forged on their behalf and got registered and the persons who impersonated Chiana and Dhoonger were identified by the present petitioner. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Rather, custodial interrogation of the petitioner-accused is necessary. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any Crl.M.No.M-18624 of 2010 (O&M) -2- opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Ram Parshad for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 7.7.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge