1 cra99-93common IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIIL REIVSION APPLICATION NO. 101 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIIL REIVSION APPLICATION NO. 104 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 100 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.98 OF 1993 ALONGWITH CIVIIL REIVSION APPLICATION NO. 103 OF 1993 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. .... Mr. T. K. Patil for appellant/petitioner in CRA 99/93, CRA 99/93, 101/93, 97/93, 103/93, 104/93, 100/93, 98/93, 103/93. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for respondent-State. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2011. 2 cra99-93common P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned AGP for the State. These Revision Applications are directed against the order passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer by which a prayer made for Reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to the “said Act”) has been rejected. Reliance is place on Sub Section 3 of Section 18 of the said Act as amended by Maharashtra Act No.38 of 1964. Under Sub Section 3, Revision is made available against an order passed by which an application for Reference under Section 18(1) of the said Act is rejected by the Collector. Hence, the Revision Applications are not maintainable and the same are dismissed as not maintainable. However, it will be open for the Revision Applicant 3 cra99-93common to adopt appropriate remedy for challenging the impugned order in accordance with law and all contentions of the parties in that behalf are kept open. JUDGE