^'. ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR l CONTEMPT CASE(C) No. 3°>^ /2011 8tn{|Ie Bench Petitioner ^ ^. S.M.Mukherjee ^C^C-A''..^' Aged about 73 years .'.•-^ri^'"" ...-<*><\ \ R/o Parijat-44, Rajkishore Nagar ..^^^ ..^\ -' t:^-' S/o Late Shri K.P.Mukherjee R/o Parijat-44, Bilaspur (CG) Versus '^- ' Respondent Contemnor Yashwant Kumar Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur (CG) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ANDSECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 25^1 1 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION (S) N0.2152/2001. 3^T ^T RvtJ<=h ^^ 'sn^T'^'RW Deepti N8^yff^»»fW '?^r '^IFIT^T, ^•al^^Ko, [®i(ni'>-i^< ~. dxo^DiA^ -33!^f •••R^ 200 \( ^ 3T^?r(^w(^rf3^^ ¥^iw^ii^i^^] SB: Hon'bte Shri IVIanmcira IVIoha o^^{<n4N ^-ITH^ff ^f Fs^ Tf^F^R ^3tRP:T3?T?^T n Shrivastava. Jl. 22^)9-2011 Shri Gary Mukhopadhaya, ccjunset forttie petitioner. Heard. Learned counset for the pet|i:ioner submits that (n €^>mpiianceof the order passed by ttiis Court on 25/02/2J011, the Corporation offered an amount of Rs.99,000/- as compensation vide itjs ietter dated 12^5^2011, to which the p$tittoner did not agree and a Setter to this e^w^i was sent to the Corporation by registered post, which was received in the offlce 6f the Corporation on 3/6/2011. Mowever, thereafter, the respondents have passed on 25/2/2011, wherein it v^as clirected that in the eveiit of faUure of an agreement on the amount of comp^nsation, the Corporation shail refer the matter to the Land Acquisition Officer wlt|iin a period of one month t'rom the date, (h@ petitioner communicates his refusat Considering the averment wi' that the petitioner shall appear bejfore the Commissioner personaiiy along with copy of the order passed by the C this order, no reference is made |iot complied wstii the later part of the order ^o the Corporation. |ich has been made in the petitjon, it is dire<Aed fc>urt eariier on 23^^2011 and the order which has now been passed. The Comrtiissioner shail take up the matter and comply with ie order of the Court. If wtth8r|t one month from the date of receipt of «?qpyof :o the Land Acqutsition OfRcer, the petitioner wouid be at liberty to revive the peti^ion. With the aforesaid observat|ons/directions, the petition ss firtaily dssposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^:w^^ ^t^ 5§^n^^,u«r^ <tn^ -! S/l 40—2/2011—1,50,000.