IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35477 of 2010 ANUJ KUMAR @ AMBUJ KUMAR @ PATHAN SON OF RAMESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR 3 22.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 394, 395, 397 and 412 of Indian Penal Code. The informant was intercepted by criminals and the motorcycle was snatched at gun point. When a protest was made, it is also the allegation that he was assaulted. In course of investigation, it has been found and recorded that the petitioner was caught along with looted motorcycle. It further appears from the impugned order that he is already accused in other cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is only confessional statement of some of the co-accused against him. It is also submitted that he is in custody since 6.5.2010. Having regard to the aforesaid facts appearing from the impugned order, this Court is not inclined to set him on liberty. Accordingly prayer for bail is refused. If the trial itself is not taken up within 08 months from the date of receipt/communication of the order in the Court below, petitioner shall have liberty to renew his prayer for bail. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J) - 2 -