IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.739 of 2010 Kaleshwar Sharma, S/O Late Bramhadutta Singh, resident of village Amhara, P.O. Amhara, P.S. Bihta, District- Patna ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.Mr.Vivek Singh, the Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna 3.Mrs.Kiran Kumari, the District Education Officer, Patna 4.Mr.Arun Kumar, District Provident Fund Officer, Patna ………….. Opp.Parties. ----------- 2. 08/09/2010 Grievance of the petitioner in this contempt application is that he has not been paid amount of provident fund with statutory interest. Opposite parties have filed a show cause enclosing a computerized chart of calculation of provident fund amount and payments thereof. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it transpires to him that interest on the amount has not been calculated of the period May 1999 upto September, 2001. This is a matter of calculation. Therefore, petitioner is given liberty to file a representation before the Director, Provident Fund and point out to him that this 2 calculation of interest of the period has not been made. Petitioner shall also be at liberty to produce the judgment of this Court according to which he claims that calculations should have been made. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the Director Provident Fund shall be well advised to get the calculation of the principal amount as well as interest checked up and verified and if any amount further falls due to the petitioner, to pass orders for payment of the same also. The contempt application is disposed of. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)