IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 7608 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 12th December, 2011. M/s Auto Pins India Limited Petitioner through Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Advocate Versus Jagat Singh and another Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner-Management is aggrieved by the impugned award dated 03.10.2007 passed by the Labour Court, Faridabad granting back-wages to respondent No. 1-Workman from February, 2002 to 30.11.2002 @ `2500/- per month along with interest @18% per annum. The Labour Court while granting the afore-stated relief to the workman has considered the oral as well as documentary evidence comprising Store Slips [Ex.W1 to Ex.W7] and Production Reports [Ex.W8 to Ex.W13] which amply prove that respondent No. 1 had worked during the relevant period but no wages were paid to him. That being so no interference by this Court in a finding of fact is called for. It may be true that interest @18% per annum as awarded by the Labour Court is on the higher side, however, I do not deem it appropriate to interfere with the same in exercise of writ jurisdiction as costs of litigation itself would be more than the arrears of interest. Dismissed. December 12, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE