IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13763 of 2009 Pachhu Yadav, son of Mohit Yadav, resident of village- Nizamuddinpur, P.S. and District- Jehanabad. …… Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar …… Opp.Party ----------- 4. 27/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is said to be driver of the stolen Bolero. As per prosecution case, petitioner was contacted on phone by the informant but he refused to work as driver any more and asked the informant to engage another driver. After engaging another driver, when the informant went at the parking place of the Bolero, he did not find his vehicle, therefore, this case was instituted. The petitioner was arrested on the next day and thereafter on the third day the said Bolero was found abandoned somewhere in Patna. It is submitted that only on the basis of suspicion petitioner has been made accused in the case. He is in custody since 13.2.2009 and he has no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the State also - 2 - submits that in the case diary except for suspicion there is no material to connect the petitioner with the crime. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Jehanabad P.S.Case No.54 of 2009. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)