1 wp2728.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2728 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. M.D. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28th APRIL, 2011 Heard Advocate Mr. Joshi for petitioner-plaintiff. Trial Court as also appellate Court have found no prima facie case or balance of convenience or possibility of irreparable loss in favour of petitioner-plaintiff, hence, prayer for temporary injunction came to be rejected. 2. According to Advocate Mr. Joshi, house property admittedly belonged to Sukhalal and thereafter devolved on present petitioner and father of original defendant. He contends that in view of this position, the joint possession of the petitioner-plaintiff is on record and trial Court therefore ought to have protected that joint possession. 3. With the assistance of learned Counsel, I have 2 wp2728.11 perused both the orders. I find it difficult to accept this contention. However, looking to the nature of controversy and the fact that suit is of the year 2008, same is expedited and the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vaijapur is directed to dispose of the Regular Civil Suit no. 200 of 2008 as early as possible and in any case by 31st December, 2011. 4. With these directions, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp2728.11