IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.41 of 2007 1. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, P.O. Veterinary College, Patna-14. 2. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, P.O. Veterinary College, Patna- 14. Versus 1. Sri Bhagwan Prasad son of Sri Kapil Muni Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Lala Toli Road, Ward No.4, P.S. Dumraon, District- Buxar. 2. Mukesh Kumar son of Paltu Das, resident of village- Shahpur, P.S. Bihpur, District Bhagalpur. 3. Kripa Sindhu Gond son of Ram Pravesh Sah, resident of village Sundarpur, P.S. Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur. 4. Rajeshwar Ram son of Shiv Nandan Ram, resident of village Rampur Ugan, P.S. Motipur, District Muzaffarpur. 5. Pawan Kumar son of Kamleshwar Yadav, resident of village- Nekta, P.S. Supaul, District Supaul. 6. Manoj Kumar Manjhee son of late Laxman Manjhee, resident of village Bishariya, P.S. Singhiya, District- Samastipur. 7. Ranjeet Kumar Ram son of Reet Lall Ram, resident of village Rampur, P.S. Warishnagar, District Samastipur. 8. Pradeep Baitha son of Chandrika Baitha, resident of village- Sugawdih, P.S. Sugauli, District- East Champaran. 9. Shivlal Biru son of Sri Karu Vishwakarma, resident of village- Mohammadpur, P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda. 10. Umesh Prasad son of Sri Rajendra Prasad, resident of village- Jhitkoria, P.S. Makhdumpur, District Jahanabad…. Petitioners- Opp.Parties.(1st set ) 11. The State of Bihar. 12. The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ----------- 5/ 26-11-2008 This petition has been filed for review of order dated 22.01.2007 by which C.W.J.C.No. 7338 of 2006 filed by opposite parties no. 1 to 10 was disposed of with a direction to the Bihar Staff Selection Commission to make recommendations as it deem fit and proper of the concluded selection being the subject matter of the said writ petition as quickly as possible but not later than six weeks from that day to the State Government. This Court does not find any error apparent on the face 2 of record nor does it find fresh material which was not available to the review petitioner on the date when the said order was passed nor even this Court finds any other reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed. BTiwary/ ( S. N. Hussain, J )