THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6179 OF 2004 DATED: 27-01-2011 Between: D.Venkat Kishan Rao. .... PETITIONER And The Central Bank of India, Rep.by its Branch Manager, Hanamkonda. .... RESPONDENT ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 16-08-2004, in E.A.No.178 of 2004 in E.P.No.517 of 2003 in O.S.No.1115 of 2002 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal District, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein- judgment-debtor for raising the attachment over his salary, was dismissed. 2. None appeared for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the respondent-bank filed a suit against the petitioner for recovery of the amounts due and the decree was passed for a sum of Rs.47,305/. Respondent-decree-holder filed E.P.No.517 of 2003, seeking realization of the decretal amount by way of attachment of the salary of the petitioner-judgment-debtor @ Rs.2000/- per month. Petitioner-judgment-debtor is stated to be working as Senior Assistant in the office of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Hanmakonda. According to the decree-holder, the salary of the judgment-debtor was Rs.9000/- per month. Judgment- debtor filed E.A.No.178 of 2004 for raising the attachment order, to reduce the amount of instalment on the ground that there are already two other attachments in force against his salary. The Execution Court dismissed that application observing that the salary attachment warrant issued by the Court was earlier in point of time than the other attachments and therefore the same prioritized for execution. After taking into consideration the salary drawn by the petitioner-judgment-debtor and also the deductions made in the salary, the Execution Court confirmed the attachment ordered earlier to the extent of Rs.500/- per month. 4. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner- judgment-debtor was working as Senior Assistant in Government service even by 2003 and even according to him he was getting salary of Rs.9000/- per month, it cannot be said that the amount of Rs.500/- per month, directed to be recovered from the salary of the judgment- debtor by way of attachment, is excessive or unreasonable. This Court, by interim order, dated 17-12-2004, in C.M.P.No.16288 of 2004, granted interim stay, subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits Rs.500/- per month before 5th of every month to the credit of the Execution Petition. On 21-03-2005, it was represented that the interim order was being complied with by making the deposit as directed. 5. In the circumstances, it is considered that no further orders are required to be passed on merits in the interim order, dated 17-12-2004, except that the petitioner- judgment-debtor be directed to continue to deposit the sum of Rs.500/- per month on or before 5th of every month to the credit of the Execution Petition, as directed earlier till the decree is fully satisfied. 6. Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 27th January, 2011. Tsy