THE HON’’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.945 OF 2010 JUDGMENT : This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 20.7.2009 in E.P.No.178 of 2009 in O.S.No.90 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, wherein the E.P. filed by the first respondent/decree holder for recovery of the amount due under the decree, by attachment and sale of the immovable property of the petitioner/3rd judgment debtor and other judgment debtors under Order 21, Rules 43, 64 and 66 of C.P.C, was ordered, directing issuance of attachment in respect of judgment debtors 2 and 3. Heard both sides. Perused the records. The first respondent herein obtained the decree in O.S.No.90 of 2006 against the petitioner/3rd judgment debtor and respondents 2 to 4 herein, for recovery of a sum of Rs.89,823/- and E.P. was filed for realisation of the same by attachment and sale of the immovable properties of judgment debtors. The learned counsel for the petitioner/3rd judgment debtor seeks permission to pay the decretal amount by way of instalment on the ground that the petitioner is only a guarantor and that he is a Teacher, getting a meagre salary. At this stage, the petitioner cannot be permitted to pay the decretal amount by way of instalments, as no such prayer was made at the time of passing of the decree and no such permission was granted in the decree. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is working as a Teacher and his salary is stated to be meagre, the petitioner is, however, granted six months time for discharging the decree debt. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, granting permission to the petitioner/3rd judgment debtor to discharge the decree within a period of six months from today and in default of payment of the same, it is open to the first respondent/decree holder to execute the decree in accordance with law. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 23rd July, 2010 Pnv