// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Appl. No.165/2009 In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1310/2002 {Shatrughan Sharma Vs. Mahendra Bhatia and Others} Date of Order ::: 04.09.2009 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri M.C. Jain, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Both applications i.e. application for restoration of appeal and application for condonation of delay in filing restoration application, were listed before this Court on 2nd September, 2009 and counsel for petitioner was directed to supply a set of both the applications to learned counsel, who was appearing for respondents in the miscellaneous appeal, and the Registry was directed to show his name in the cause-list. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has already supplied a set of both the applications to learned counsel for respondents and his name has also been shown in the cause- list but no one is present on behalf of the respondents to oppose the applications. // 2 // I have heard learned counsel for petitioner and, after considering his submissions and also the reasons assigned in the applications, the delay in filing the application for restoration of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is restored to its original number. Both the applications stand allowed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//