IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1334 of 2010 Date of Decision : January 17, 2011 Union of India and others ....Appellants Versus Surjit Singh .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present : Ms. Renu Bala Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. K.S.Dadwal, Advocate for the respondent. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 9.10.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge. In para 2 of the judgment, the learned Single Judge has recorded the fact that counsel for the parties had agreed that the controversy is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court rendered in Ex.-CFN Jai Vir Singh v. Union of India and others (CWP No. 5831 of 1995, decided on 1.9.2000. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge allowed the petition in terms of the aforesaid judgment. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the LPA No. 1334 of 2010 -2- considered view that no appeal would be maintainable against the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge. Even otherwise, the disability pension is payable to the writ petitioner-respondent because the Medical Board has in categorical terms opined that the disability pension was attributable to or aggravated by military service as is clear from the communication dated 11.12.1997 (R-1). The appeal is, thus, without merit which is dismissed. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S.MANN ) January 17, 2011 JUDGE ajay-I