1 wp 9776.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9776 OF 2011 Sunanda @ Sunita Mahadeo Darade .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S. G. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri K. B. Choudhari, Addl. G. P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri Jadhavar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel vehemently submits that the reasons for which the appeal has been allowed and has been remanded back does not stand to any reason. The reasons given are self contradictory. The learned counsel submits that the respondent No. 4 who was the Chairman was not managing the affairs of the society properly, was not conducting any meetings and was engaged in acts of omission and commissions. As such, the society was rightly de-registered. Vide the impugned order, the order passed by the Assistant Registrar U/Sec. 21-A of the 2 wp 9776.11 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act is set aside and again the matter is remanded back for fresh hearing and trial before the Assistant Registrar. The same was unwarranted. The learned counsel further submits that the respondent No. 3 has not reconstructed the society after the orders been passed. 2. With the assistance of learned counsel I have gone through the order. The Assistant Registrar had de-registered the society. The said order was impugned before the Divisional Joint Registrar. The petitioner was also the member of the society. The petitioner was not going to gain by de-registration of the society. If the grievance of the petitioner is that the Chairman is not managing the affairs of the society, the petitioner has other remedy. Vide the impugned order the Divisional Joint Registrar has remanded the matter to the Assistant Registrar for fresh enquiry. I do not find any perversity in the impugned order passed to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As such, the writ petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11