HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.10562 of 2010 ORDER: Head Sri S.M. Subhani, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. At their request the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner has invoked this Court’s jurisdiction questioning the action of the respondents in threatening to demolish his building under the guise of the show cause notice dated 12.04.2010 issued by the 2nd respondent under Section 452 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. Petitioner would assert that he had filed his objections thereto claiming protection under G.O.Ms. No.423 dated 31.07.1998. A copy of the objections dated 20.04.2010 bears the stamp of the respondent dated 21.04.2010 as proof of receipt thereof. I consider it appropriate, in such circumstances, to direct the respondents not to take action for demolition of the building in question, except after considering the objections filed by the petitioner; examining whether the petitioner is entitled for exemption, from seeking permission for construction, in terms of G.O.Ms. No.423 dated 31.07.1998; and, if need be, thereafter take action for demolition of the building in question after issuing a notice under Section 636 of the Act. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 29th April 2010 Note: Issue by wire at party’s costs. B/o MRKR