^ BTB???! >IN' IUI CF r s^) BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. V6/ /2007 PETITIONER ^y^- ^^p'" cf'y'r^.'' ^ ^" .c?v.<-t; i" \.^'-' ^'^ RESPONDENTS ^Aathura, S/o. Jeevan, aged about 60 years, working as Gangman, resident of village Pandhi, Tah. Seepat, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1 .^-- Sfate of Chhaftisgarh, through the Principal Secrefary, Department of Public Works, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) \ 2. The Superintendent Engineer, Deparfmenf of Public Works, Bilaspur (C.G,.) /3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Departmenf, Sub Division No.2, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22^0F THE CQNSTnV[IQN_QF INDIA ^^ W. P. (s) Ns. 701 of 2007 Petitioner : Mathu'ra Ver-sus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh & ot? Mnn'hk U rDie mr. Ju •iSI 'resent: AA". Ashok Soni, Advocate for ths petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pane! lawyer for fne res| 's,, (Psssed on this 7 &ay of February, 2007 1. Learned counsel appeai-'ing for ffle petitioner as weli as for the State/respondents jointiy .submit that the facts of ths present writ pstition are simiiar to that of in \V. P. No. 454/2005 (Sam Prasad Ycdav & others vs. Stsfe of Chhattisgarh d others), which was al'owed vide order dated 4.1.2007. They rurthe" submit that the auestion of law invoivsd is also the same. 2. In view of the above-statsd submissions made by leflrned counsei for the pci'ties, the writ petition js ailowed in terms of the or'der* 3'ated 4.1.2007 oassed by this C in Vi/. P. No. 454/2006 s'f Prasad Yadav & others vs. State of CnhattisgGrh & owers). No r as TO COSTS. iablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge