SBCWP NO.3685/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3685/2009. Ram Babu Dixit Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal & Ors. Date of order:- July 7, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Jitendra Pandey for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- This writ petition has been filed challenging the transfer order dated 27/6/2008 and the order dated 13/10/2008 by which, appeal filed by the petitioner against the said order of transfer was rejected by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal. 2) Contention of Shri Jitendra Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner is that in so far as subject taught by the petitioner is concerned, result of the petitioner has been found to be very excellent but for some time in between, he was given additional charge of the post of Head Master Government Upper Primary School Gadhichotla and if over all result of the school is 18% of a particular academic session, petitioner alone cannot be held responsible for that. Order of transfer apparently was made as a measure of penalty. Tribunal failed to SBCWP NO.3685/09. 2 consider this aspect of the matter. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court towards the order of the government dated 16/1/2009 whereby his representation was rejected. It is argued that the government has not objectively considered the pleas raised by the petitioner in his representation. Learned counsel submitted that the post at Government Upper Primary School Gadhichotla is lying vacant where petitioner is still working. Writ petition therefore be allowed. 3) When pointedly asked, learned counsel for the petitioner was not in a position to inform the court as to since when petitioner has remained posted at Government Upper Primary School Gadhichotla. Transfer order of the petitioner was made on administrative exigencies. Even if over all result of the petitioner was excellent but he having the charge of Head Master, was also responsible for over all result of the school. This cannot be said to be an irrelevant consideration in making transfer and posting. Respondents have rightly rejected representation of the petitioner. Petitioner cannot insist for his posting at a particular place. I do not find any merit in this writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil