BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(CG) i 359 WRIT PETITION ( S) N0. /2008 PETITIONER •^•^s^ ,.y^^-^ Aa^--"l_^^..__.._. Purushottam Das Kumbhare, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Bapudas resident of Ho. no. 890. , Kailash Nagar, Bhilai, Distt: Durg, Chhattisgarh. •i RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^'^ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG ) The Joint Collector, Distt: Durg (CG) The Additional Chief Vigilence Officer, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, Durg (CG) Chief.Genl. Manager RSM RTS & RPDB BHILAI STEEL PLANT BHILAI DURG C,G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ .^'"^ ^y 2. 3. ;llll ^ :-..-IA, , PETiTsONER RESPONDENTS HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH -: BILASPUR Purushottam Das Kumbhare yersus' State of Chhattlsgarh & Others (Writ Petition undsr Article 226 of ths Const'rtution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. AgnJhotrI, J. Present > Shri T.K. Tiwari, counsei for the petitJoner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Oy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Kashif Shakeei, coynsel for the respondents No.3 & 4. 1) 2) 3) (ORAU . (Passed on thls 17th day of NQyemb^r, 2009) With the consent o? iearned Icounsel appearing for the parties, the petltion is heard finaily. Bythis petition, the pefitioner seeks the-foiiowing reiiefs : "7.1 This Hon'bls Court may kindiy bs pi^ased to cai! for the entlre records pertaining to the of the pQtitioner from the possession of the respondent No.2 for kind perusal of this Hon'bte Court. 7.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindiy be pieased to jssue a writ In the nature of certiorari 'for quashing the report dated 4-10-2007 Annexure - P/6 passed by the respondent No.2 as weli as the charge sheet Ann.P/7, 7.3 Any othsr rellef(s) whlch this Hon'ble Court may think' proper in vlew of. the facts and circumstances of the case may also klndiy be granted." Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the petition may be dlsposed of Vv'ith a direction to the respondent/SASL BSP for forvvarding the report of the Joint Collector to the High Levei Caste Scrutlny Commlttee, ChhaSisgarh for veriflcation of caste status/certificate of the petitloner in :• terms: of procedure and guldeiines for verificatlon of caste certificate laid down by the Supreme Court In Kymari tAadhyri Patll -and Another vs. A,ddl. CommissiG-ner, Tribal Development and Gthers1 and teke action as per guldeilnes enumerated in the sald •judgment. AJR19.95SC94 5) Gowrl In vlew of foregolng, the report dated 4-10-2007 (Annexure - P^), sent by the office of the Coilector (Counter Section), Dyrg^vhereby It has been deciared that the petitioner has obtained caste ce'rtiflcate of Scheduled Tribe categor/ on.the basis of forged documents, is set aslde. However, the respondent No.3 shali be at llberty.to forward the report of the Jolnt Coilector to the Hlgh Level Caste Scrutiny Commlttee, Chhattisgarh for verificatlon ofthe.caste status/certiflcate of th.e petltioner as per guldeij'nes laJd down In Kymari (supra). The sald Committee shai! declde the matter afresh after affordlng opportunity of hearing to the partles. With the afbresaid observations and directions, the writ petition Is dlsposed of. . r Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge