IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 3628 of 2010. Decided on: 1st July, 2010. Ramesh Kumar. ….. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): C.M.P. No. 5615 of 2010. Allowed. The application is disposed of. C.W.P. No. 3628 of 2010. The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(a) The Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to implement order dated 19.4.2007 (Annexure P 1) directing the respondents to post the petitioner as Deputy Ranger in Deol Block. 2 (b) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to post the petitioner as Deputy Ranger in Baijnath Range as the post is lying vacant. (c) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari quashing order dated 14.6.2008, whereby respondent No. 5 has been posted as Deputy Ranger in Deol Block. (d) Direct the respondents by issuing writ of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representations made by the petitioner and till same are not decided not to disturb the petitioner from present place of posting.” 2. It is seen that the various representations filed by the petitioner have not been considered so far. In that view of the matter, we do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 5th respondent at this stage. We also do not propose to go into the merits of the case since it is ultimately for the first respondent to take a decision adverting to the submissions made by the petitioner in the representations. Therefore, the first respondent is directed to take a decision on Annexure P-6A to 6C (representations), in accordance with law and justice and also adverting to the submissions made by the petitioner therein. The needful shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. In the process, it is made clear that the first respondent shall also consider whether the petitioner can be accommodated at Baijnath where there is an open vacancy. 3 The petition stands disposed of, so as the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 1st July, 2010 (bhupender)