24 % 02.02.2011 Present: Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh and Mr. Sankalp Sharma, Advs. for the Petitioner. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with ASI Ram Gopal, P.S. Mukharjee Nagar. Respondent No. 1 in person. Crl. M.A. Nos. 1245-46/2011 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. + Crl. M.C. No. 311/2011 Marriage between petitioner No. 3 and respondent No. 1 was solemnized on 14^^ October, 2002 as per the Hindu rites and ceremonies. One male child, namely, Sahitya Jhamb was'born from their wedlock. On account of some matrimonial discord, present FIR was registered under Section 498-A/406 IPG on the complaint of respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 1 was occup3dng property of petitioner No. 1, who is her father-in-law. Petitioner No. 1 filed a suit for eviction against respondent No. 1, which was decreed by the Additional District Judge in his favour on 31®^ October, 2009. Respondent No. 1 filed RFA No. 92/2010 in this Court against the said decree wherein a settlement was arrived at between the parties which has been recorded in the order dated 22"^ April, 2010 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court. In terms of the settlement, petitioner No. 3 and respondent No. 1 have obtained a decree of divorce by way of mutual; consent from the Family Courts, Rohini on 14th December, 2010. . In terms of the settlement, petitioner No. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 1 has already paid ^9 lacs to respondent No. 1 at the time of recording of first motion. Besides this, a Fixed Deposit Receipt in the sum of ^5 lacs has been drawn in the name of minor child and handed over to respondent No. 1 at the time of grant of decree of divorce. Remaining settled amount of ?9 lacs has been paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 1 today by way of three demand drafts, photocopies whereof have been placed on record. Respondent No. 1 has also withdrawn her petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., in terms of the settlement. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, in the larger interest, FIR No. 295/2006 under Sections 498-A/406 IPG registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar and the consequent proceediQgs emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti: FEBRUARY 02, 2011 rb A.K. PATHAK, J.