IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-27786 of 2008 Date of decision : 13.08.2009 Meena Kumari ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Swapan Shorey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, AAG Haryana. Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No. 2. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned complaint, Annexure P-1 has already been withdrawn by the complainant. According to the counsel, the instant petition has, thus, been rendered infructuous. It is, however, submitted by the counsel that Rs. 16 lacs deposited by respondent No. 2 are still lying deposited in the trial court and the petitioner is entitled to half share thereof. He, therefore, submits that he has to move an application to withdraw the said amount from the trial court. Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the amount from the trial court. Dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to move the application aforesaid, to be decided by the trial court in accordance with law. 13.08.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE