!'<^.<K<:^. ......:'%^---t""" c- -P^of IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, JUDICATURE AT BHASPUR Writ Petition No. <^9^ /2006 Respojid^nte Manoj Tiwari, Son of Shri V. P. Sharma, Aged about 34 years, Assistant Treasury Officer, posted at District Treasury, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Finance & Planning Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,>2. Dr. A. K. Singh, Under Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur r' ^w>'^' / Department, ^ 1<->''AA0^^ (Chhattisgarh) l?"*'- i^'T- * c»\\'-,i\?^ !^^'^y ^.^ 3. Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Chhattisgarh Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'y XI-HC-22 ~T -TE? •^raRra, ^•dl'y'iB, i6<wwli< *<iHCTrg»»nc!i_.M^^/V£ ^ an^r^i h-u'h an^i ^*1 ^^T sn^si •E^giwsf?^ Shri J.P. Pandey, coynsel for the Shri G.K. Ben'wa!, Dy. Advocate Py. Govt. Advocate, for the State. ,] Application for urgent hearing isai Heard. Learned counsel for the petitionei) i^osted at Jagdalpur vide order dated 4/1( tjie petitioner has Jseen transferred froi|n (anker vide order dated 8/2/2006 and it. iace. He aiso submitied that the tranbf |uring the ban period in mid session. . Counsel for the.State submits th< ^presentation to the authorify concern^d :[ie present the petitioner may b®direct^e Ws arievances to the authorities |s own merits in accordance with iaw. Havina considered and without (leriis of the case, in the opinion of jerved if a' direction is given to thej ^presentation raising his grievahces •^spondents along with a copy of the befbre lay-s, and on such representation b.ein^ ^e respondenisshail-decide the same iaw as early as possible preferabiy >« 41<lf<rl<fl-< •RTTOf •? fetfl ^R?IT ^TsiPaiTan^r General, with Shri Satlsh Gupta, owed. . submifted that the petitioner was 1/2000. He further submitted that Jagdalpur to Antagarh, district io person has been posted in his is .against the transfer poljcy ^ the petitioner has not msde any i. He however submifs that for ;^d to file a representation raising 1, which shail be considered on [expressing any opinion on the Court, ends of justice wiil be petitioner to make a detailed the competent authority of the tietition and this order, within 15 filed, the competent authority of |on Its own merits in aceordance iNhin two months from the date of [^^feir XI-HC-22 -TS ^ffqi^PI, •S^WT?, ^IRiy f^^a' sn^r^ii f?TO73n^i »*i yfea uA + '^ 7S <ss~ 3!i^t ^giwaf?^ :z- leceipt of the representation. It is m^ jrievance still remains, he may avail the.j At this stage, iearned counsel f<| tietitioner hgs not been relieved so far i jjiiace. He prays for intefim protection. Haying thus considered, it is dir) ilieved so far, he may continue on fh^ ipresentation is decided; With the aforesaid observations, tl1 Consequentiy M.W.P. No. 695/20!] Certified copyas perrules. 'bl-'lid'il-f Nli-lril'? fezt lfaR?re ^;3TfiOT3II^I de ciear that if the petitioner's r the petitioner submits that-the ind none has been posted in his wted that if the petitioner is not present p!ace 'of posting tili the is petition stands 6 aiso stands dis disposedof. of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['(f^^[<a^