1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.7 OF 2009 Smt.Shakuntala B Mande : Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Shri Ramdas P Sabban for the Petitioner. ShriS.R.Nargolkar, AGP, for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : JANUARY 12, 2009 P.C. 1. The contempt alleged is of the order dated 5th May 2008 passed by a Division Bench of this Court. By the said order the competent authority under the ULC Act 1976 was directed to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 15th February 2008 in accordance with law. 2 2. Shri S.R.Nargolkar, the learned AGP, draws my attention to the affidavit filed by Shri Bhausaheb Joti Patil, the Additional Collector and Competent Authority dated 16th December 2008 to which is annexed the order dated 1st December 2008 passed by him rejecting the representation of the Petitioner dated 15th February 2008. 3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner sought to make submissions on the merits of the said order dated 1st December 2008 4. In my view, if the Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, she would be at liberty to file such proceedings are as permissible in law to challenge the said order. In view of the said order passed by the Additional Collector and Competent Authority, there is no warrant to proceed with the Respondents in the contempt jurisdiction. The above Contempt Petition is accordingly dismissed. [R.M.SAVANT, J]