1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.9784 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 R.Jansi Rani ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirumangalam,Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Town Police Station, Thirumangalam Taluk,Madurai District. 3. V.Meenakshisundaram ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the first and second respondents from interfering with the rights of the parties in the pending civil litigation between the husband of the petitioner and the third respondent. For Petitioner ... Mr.D.Sadiq Raja For R.1 to R.2 ... Mr.TR.Janarthanam Additional Government Pleader For R.3 ... Mr.L.Madhusudhanan ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the first and second respondents from interfering with the rights of the parties in the pending civil litigation between the husband of the petitioner and the third respondent. 2. Heard Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.TR.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.L.Madhusudhanan, learned Counsel for the third respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the first and second respondents from interfering with the rights of the petitioner pending civil litigation. 5. According to the petitioner, the police authorities were summoning the petitioner's husband to appear before the police authority and no notice has been issued. The petitioner pleaded that her husband suffered from illness and she has produced records of the hospital, in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 which it is stated that the husband of the petitioner by name P.Rajkumar is admitted in the hospital. Considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 were restrained from taking any action against the petitioner's husband until further orders by this Court. 6. The learned counsel for the third respondent private party and the learned Additional Government Pleader state that the authorities will issue a proper notice and summons, if required and the husband of the petitioner after recovering from his illness can appear before the authority and explain his version. They denied any form of harassment. It is stated that the authority will proceed in the matter only as per law. The allegation stated in the affidavit are vehemently denied by the official respondents. 7. In view of the stand taken by the official respondents, there is no justification for further order or direction in this case. The authority is directed to deal with the matter as per law. 8. The Writ Petition is disposed of, as above. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirumangalam,Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Town Police Station, Thirumangalam Taluk,Madurai District. +1cc to The Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.32043 W.P.(MD)No.9784 of 2011 15.09.2011 ps PA/29.09.2011/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/