IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.665 of 2007 YUGAL KISHORE YADAV …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. DUKHAN YADAV 3. NARAYAN YADAV 4. RITLAL YADAV 5. HURO YADAV 6. ABHIRAM YADAV 7. HUBLAL YADAV 8. SONA YADAV 9. SHUKAR YADAV …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 04. 20.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even on the strength of one witness who is injured, the trial court ought to have convicted the accuseds (opposite party nos.2 to 9 herein) for an offence punishable under section 302 IPC. It is an admitted fact that the informant of the case who was brother of the deceased, has not been examined. The prosecution produced only one witness. It was appraised by the learned trial court and found that on the strength of deposition of solitary witness the prosecution has failed to prove the charge(s) framed against the accuseds beyond shadow of reasonable doubts. Consequently, the judgment and order of acquittal has been recorded. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the impugned judgment, I am satisfied that no patent illegality has been committed meriting any interference. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )