MJC No.2737 OF 1996 RAM BILAS RAI-------------------------Petitioner Versus SRI MAHESH PRASAD & ANR-----Opposite Parties --------- For The Petitioner : Mr.Subodh Kumar, Advocate For The Opp.Parties : None. -------- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DR. RAVI RANJAN -------- Prasad & Ranjan, JJ. This application has been filed for initiating a proceeding for contempt against the opposite party for non- compliance of the order dated 25th of June, 1996 passed in C.W.J.C.No.228 of 1983. Although in the writ application, several reliefs were sought for, but when the said writ application was taken up for hearing, petitioner confined the same only in the matter of superannuation of age. A Division Bench of this Court directed that the age of superannuation of the petitioner shall be the same as that of his counterparts of Bihar College of Engineering, Patna. Complaining non-compliance of the aforesaid order, the present application has been filed. Show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 Director of Science and Technology, in which it has been stated that in the light of the order of this Court the State 2 government issued order dated 6.7.1998 and enhanced the age of the petitioner to 60. Mr.Subodh Kumar, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contends that although the age of the employee has been enhanced, but the petitioner has not been given the consequential benefit. There is nothing on the record to show that any benefit, which the petitioner was entitled on account of enhancement of the age, has not been given. In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that this application is absolutely misconceived. It is dismissed accordingly. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) Patna High Court, Dated, 16th of July, 2008. NAFR/ Narendra/