IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8493 of 2006 Between: Smt.V.Ramanamma, w/o Venkateshwarlu, r/o H.No.9-118, Pandurangapuram Colony, pallepally Post, Khammam urban, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep., by its Prl.Secretary, Backward Classes Welfare (B-1) Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, B.C.Welfare, Telugu Samkshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 A.P.Nayee Brahmins Co.op.Societies Federation ltd., rep., by the Managing Director, Telugu Samkshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4 Sri G.Sekhar Babu, Chairman, A.P.Nayee Brahmin Co.operative Federation Society Ltd., Neelima Talkies Circle, Anantapur, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or order more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in conducting the elections only to the 897 primary Nayee Brahmin Societies out of 1505 Societies and ignoring 608 Primary Nayee Brahmin Societies is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to conduct elections to the remaining 608 Primary Nayee Brahmin Societies and elect the oﬃce bearers of the 3rd respondent from the elected members of the 1505 Primary Nayee Brahmin Societies and to pass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. __________ 30-07-2008 rkk