IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1215 of 2009 KOLI DEVI & ORS Versus NAND JEE PRASAD & ORS ----------- 4. 14/5/2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner files the details with regard to the parties in view of the defect as pointed out by the Stamp Report dated 21.4.2009. Let it be kept on the record. Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, appears for the respondents No. 1 to 7 and 9 to 11 and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, appears on behalf of the respondent No. 8. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 8 submits that he had already filed Vakalatnama in the Civil Revision No. 1758 of 2004. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 1758 of 2004 which was dismissed for non compliance of the order dated 26.2.2009. No objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and Civil Revision No. 1758 of 2004 is restored to its original file. S. Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)