IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8167/2008 Decided on:29.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Bhag Mal. …Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the instructions dated 3.2.2009 and judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No.2882/2008, titled Darshan Singh versus H.R.T.C, decided on 15.12.2009. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in view of instructions dated 3.2.2009 as well as the principles laid down in above cited judgment within a period of two months from 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 29.12.2010 *awasthi*