IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17956 of 2010 RAMADHAR CHAUDHARY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 9.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is stated to have been suspended by an order dated 14.9.2010. It is submitted that the ground mentioned for suspension are the same as that contained in another order dated 20.9.2010 by which 9 others were suspended. Some of them approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 16787 of 2010 which was allowed on 25.10.2010. Counsel for the State submits that the writ application is premature as three months have not expired from 14.9.2010 to vitiate the order in absence of charges having been framed, under Rule 9(7) of the Bihar C.C.A. Rules, 2005. This Court in C.W.J.C. No. 16787 of 2010 for reasons discussed therein held the order of suspension to be vitiated on merits. The question of applicability of Rule 9(7) of the Bihar C.C.A. Rules does not arise. For reasons already discussed in 2 C.W.J.C. No. 16787 of 2010, the writ application is allowed. The order of suspension dated 14.9.2010 is set aside. The writ application stands allowed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)