® % ^' <r^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} M.C.C.NO. vtf lo OF^8@9—Oivislon ^ ^- ^•1- APPLICANTS 1. APPELLANTS ^£^> ....•••"":>^-a' '" "- ' ""\^'6\^1 n....-^"^~ ' 3. ^' NON-APPLICANTS 1. NON-APPLICANTS Surendri Bai, aged about 40 yeas Widow of Late Shri Jailal, Caste Kolta, Occupation Housewife; Rakesh, aged about 17 yearsSon of Late Shri Jailal Pradhan; Manisha, agedabout 14 years D/o Late Shri Jailal Pradhan; Mandakini, aged about 12 years D/o Late Shri Jailal Pradhan; No.2 to 4 minors, through mother Smt. Surendri Bai, Widow of Late Shri Jailal Pradhan. Bhojram, aged about 85 years Son of Late Khedu Pradhan; Subhadra, aged about 80 years Wife of Bhojram Pradhan; All resident of Village Boierdih, Police Station Basna, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS Sewalal Pradhan, aged about 24 years Son of Manohar Pradhan (Driver of Motor cycle Bajaj X- C.D.-125 No. C.G.-06/C/9954), Resident of Village Thelkodadar, Police Station Basna, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.). ^i ffi 2, ^' Gunsagar Patel, aged about 24 years Son of Nirakar Patel, Occupation Agriculture, (Registered owner of Motor cycle Bajaj X-C.D.- 125 No. C.G.-06/C/9954), Resident of Village Thelkodadar, Police Station Basna, Tahsit Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.). The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company, Lalganga Premises, M. G. Road, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), ( Insurerof Motor cycle Bajaj X-C.D.-125 No. C.G.-06/C/9954). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF M. A. (C) N0. 78/2009, "SURENDRI BAI AND 5 OTHERS V/S. SEWALAL PRADHAN AND 2 OTHERS" The applicants most respectfully beg to submit as under:- HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANTS APPELLANTS NON-APPLICANT8 NON-APPLICANTS M.C.C. No. 7 of2010 Surendri Bai & others, VERSUS : Sewalal Pradhan & Others. APPLICATION FOR RE8TORATION OF M.A. fQ No. 78/2009 8URENDRI BAI AND 5 OTHERS V/S. SEWALAL PRADHAN AND 2 OTHERS. DB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri & Hon'ble Shri Raieshwar Lal Jhanwar. JJ. Present: None fbr the applicaists. None forlfae non-applic^its. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 28th day of January, 2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor axsy representation is made on behalf of fhe a^lieatrts. TTie applicairts may not be interested in pursuing Ifae matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecirtion. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge Ainit