^ ,x^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No;.3^6 / 200Q ^^lCA-\-4-11 ^^-"1 L^_.^..» . .......^JC^^ ^•^^^'"" ^<'.-'-:-^" Qtf Xespondents Smt. Pritibala Taunk, W/o Shri Pradccp Kumar Taunk, Aged about 44 years, Worklng as Assistant Profcssor (Department of Physics), in Government Digvijay College, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, R/o Behind Mundra Kunj, R.K.Nagar, G.E.Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ^-I. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secrctary, Department Of Migher Education, D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^" 2,. Director, Higher Education Directorate, Government ofC.G., D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . 3. The Principal, Government Digvijay Collcge, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER DATED 1^^68.2000 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION fS) N0.^^7/2000 !C—78 31?^T 'SF? R^N WVi W?^?T 9ti^w TScr ^i^i<n^, ^til ^^<o/ T^<ni^^ M-c- <^- c^- y^_/_ *<1*<CTI 5l»<ll<!t» 200^ 3n^?r Traw (yi{^<^) ^nw^f^T ^^?R SB ; H6N;>SLfe SHftl JUSTICE P&ITINKER DIWAKER 08.09.2009 Shri Manish Sharma, couri Shri Pa.nkaj Shriva.stava^ P. Heard on the applicatiorj 13.8.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. Counsel for the applicaiit 4 two writ petifcions i.e. W.P.(S) No4 No. 4337/2009 is reiated to the No. 4336/2009 is related to grarj account of typographical error in W.P.(S) No. 4336/2009 has bee^ should have been as per the order) Counsel for the State f^ typographical error the order 4337/2009 requires modification. | I have heard counsel for th( Now the prder dated 4337/2009 is recalled and the orc| "Counsel for the petifcionei involved in the present case is sq of the Madhya Pra.desh State two such orders are filed as Anne^ view of the settled law, at this su to withdraw the present petition before respondent No.l. He be issued for deciding the expeditiousty. To this prayer of th< howelker for "LIm St9.tC IH&S ft6~0bj'ebtion. <!*»l<4i^4)'1 HIHdl "^ fe%t <Fsit^K ^3tRR31T^r el fbr the applicant. .. for the State. fbr modification of order dated 41337/2009. lUbmits that the petitioner has filed 4337/2009 8s 4336/2009. W,P.(S) grant of increment whereas W.P.(S) |.t of pay scale. He submits that on ly.P.(S) No, 4337/2009, the order of |i typed whereas the correct order |dated 12.8.2009 (Annexure A/3). urly admits that on account of (dated 13.8.2009 in W.P.(S) No. parties. 13.8.2009 passed in W.P.(S)No. br would be as under: submits that the question of la^v {jarely covered by various decisions jninistrative Tribunal and copies of |ure P/4, He further submits that in [ge the petitioner may be permitted ^dth liberty to file a representation submits that the direction may 1-epresentation of the petitioner ^ counsel fbr the petitioner^ counsel 4- f T %. -HC—78 ^^T <<fl<< l<?1^, Wtl^'1 %, T®<^tlW^ i _(^.C-C-. Qs^a. ri<iG / W1W%^^'"""'"t""''"l"^^""-^:-'';<^200-5 ^i^T^SF (^fg^?) ^T^T W1 ^^ W^ ^H^T 9b*li^> ^ •^ 'F^TW ^rft^ ^'91 -2-— Accordingly^ the writ petit| the liberty as aforesaid. If the witKin a period of three weeks frc] this order, the same is expecfe<] concerned within a further period] receipt strictly in accordance aforementioned decisions of the N Tribunal. ^Hi<?1<fl^ W^f ^ f^^t ^Rl^K '^a^fTO^?F |on is dismissed as wifhdrawn with Ipetitioner makes a representation ^m the date of receipt of the copy of ^ to be decided by the authorifcies 1 of three months from the date of its with law^ in the light of the fadhya Pradesh State Administrative Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judgc L.