IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 4169 of 2008(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHIJUMON KURIAKOSE SON OF V.C.KURIAKOSE, VARANATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE AREEPARAMBU P.O., KOTTAYAM-686501. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAMPADY, KOTTAYAM. 3. EJOM, MELEDATHU HOUSE AREEPARAMBU P.O., KOTTAYAM-686501. 4. K.K.BALAKRISHNAN, KOYIPRATHU VEEDU AREEPARAMBU P.O., KOTTAYAM. 5. SUNNY, PALIYIL VEEDU, AMAYANNUR KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 4169/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF THE VEHICLE KL-03/M 7281. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE POLICE DATED 24.1.2008. EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.15/08 DATED 24.1.2008. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 4169 OF 2008-U ----------------------------------------- Dated 28th February, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking police protection to him and his driver, to park his Bajaj Goods Autorickshaw bearing registration No.KL-3/M 7281 at Oravakkal junction, under the jurisdiction of the 1st respondent. According to the petitioner, respondents 3 to 5, who are drivers of the vehicles plied from that auto stand, are obstructing and preventing him and his driver from parking the vehicle there and operating from there. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the dispute between the parties has been settled and at present there is no obstruction to the parking of the petitioner's vehicle or its operation. 3. The 5th respondent has filed a counter affidavit on behalf of himself and also on behalf of respondents 3 and 4. He denies the allegations against the said respondents, raised by the petitioner. According to the 5th WPC 4169/2008 2 respondent, the petitioner's driver manhandled the 3rd respondent and now a crime has been registered against him. To escape from further proceedings in the crime, this writ petition is filed, it is submitted. 4. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader, which we have recorded in paragraph 2 of this judgment, no further orders are required in this writ petition. Accordingly, it is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. Nm/