IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3967 of 2010 1. ARJUN MANJHI S/O LATE RAM POOJAN MANJHI R/O VILL.- KUKUNDPUR, P.S.- EKMA, DISTT.- SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY LAND REFORMS AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM COLLECTOR DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA 3. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ESTABLISHMENT CHAPRA 4. DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, CHAPRA 5. CIRCLE OFFICER SADAR (BLOCK), CHAPRA, LAND REFORMS & REVENUE DEPARTMENT, CHAPRA 6. OM PRAKASH YADAV S/O SHIVJI RAI R/O VILL.- SAMHAUTA, P.S. KOPA, DISTT.- SARAN ----------- 2. 11.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner has been transferred from Halka No. 3 to Halka No. 12. The court is informed that Halka is a unit within a Block for purposes of revenue collection. Therefore the petitioner has neither been transferred outside the District much less outside the Block. The writ petition does not make out any legal ground for interference with the order of transfer which requires violation of any statutory rules, palpable malafide orders etc. No ground for interference by the Court is made out. The petitioner is stated to have represented to the Circle Officer, respondent no. 5. If the employee has any grievance, a model employer is expected to consider his representation and then pass appropriate order upon it. Let it be so done preferably within a period eight weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)