IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2144 of 2003 Between: P.Janaki, W/o.P.Chadrashekar Rao, R/o.Plot No.491/2Rt, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice Chairman, Hydrerabad, Urban Developmet Authority, HUDA Office, Paiga Estates, Secunderabad. 2 The Estate Officer, Hyd.Urban Develpoment Authority, Begumpet, Opp: Police Lanes, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing cancellation Notice No.866/TC/EMC/HUDA/92, dt. 23.12.2002 TO THE EFFECT COMPELLING THE PETITIONER TO PAY RENT TO THE COMMON AREA 1468 sq. ft. surrounded to the stalls which is not in lease agreement as contract entered by them as is illegal, arbitrary and against to th Principls of Natural Justice and further directing the respondents to collect the rents only to the extent of 872 Sq.Ft. for ten stalls as entered lease agreement by them in the year 1992 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.T.H.SOWBHAGYA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: M.DHANANJAY REDDY(SC FOR HUDA) The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.2144 OF 2003 ORDER: This Writ Petition was listed for hearing on 15.06.2009. As there was no representation when the matter was called, it is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Although the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, to day also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Default. No costs. _____________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY,J) Date.16-06-2009 IVD/ASP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.2144 OF 2003 Date.16-06-2009 Ivd/ASP