THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Dated this the 11th day of November, 2009. W.P.Nos. 23236 of 2001 & 3696 of 2002. Between: 1.Vatyam Kamiaiah and two others. ………Petitioners vs. 1.The Secretary to the Government of A.P. Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and two others. …….Respondents. AND 1.P.V.Satyavathi and four others. ………Petitioners vs. 1.The Secretary to the Government of A.P. Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and five others. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.Nos. 23236 of 2001 & 3696 of 2002. COMMON ORDER: It is represented that in identical issues as urged in these writ petitions, in S.L.P.No. 7076 the Supreme Court by its order dt. 7.7.2009 granted liberty to the petitioners therein to prefer a comprehensive representation to the authorities and the authorities are directed to consider the same on its merits. It is therefore submitted that the writ petitioners herein also be granted a similar concession of making a comprehensive representation to the respondents and the respondents be directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon. It is needless to observe that the writ petitioners are at liberty to submit an exhaustive representation bringing out all the relevant facts and circumstances seeking redressal of their grievance to the State Government and it is always open to the State Government to consider the same on its merits and redress the grievance of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible. With the above observation, the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall no order as to costs. _____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J 11.11.2009. krb. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.Nos. 23236 of 2001 & 3696 of 2002. Dated 11-11-2009.