:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.19 OF 2008 Shri Ramesh Keshav Rathod ...Applicant. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.R.R.Arolkar, adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Thomas Almeida , adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 24th January, 2008. DATE: 24th January, 2008. DATE: 24th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the revision application because now it is revealed to him that there is no provision for revision application in the Slum Act. He seeks liberty to file writ petition for the same cause of action. 2. Revision Application stands disposed off as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. If the writ petition is filed within two weeks from this day, the execution of the impugned decree shall remain stayed for a period of two weeks. :2: (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)