S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.208/2007 (Vishnu vs. S.E., PWD Circle III, Udaipur & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER : 19/9/2008 HON'BLE DR.JUSITCE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Shambhoo Rathore, for the appellant. This appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of two courts below. The first appellate court by its judgment dated 25/1/2006 upheld the judgment of learned trial court dated 20/12/2001 and both the courts below came to the conclusion that the plaintiff had no right over the land in question and, therefore, he could not oppose the land acquisition proceedings being undertaken by the State Government for public purpose, therefore, he was not entitled to injunction as prayed for. Having heard learned counsel and perused the impugned orders it is seen that the courts below had arrived at the findings on the basis of relevant evidence as land in question of Aaraji No.4644 was entered in the revenue record in the name of Hindustan Zinc Limited and construction of four lane highway had already started on the said land acquired by the State Government and courts below found on the basis of documentary evidence and defence witnesses, who appeared before the courts below that the plaintiff had no right over the land in question, therefore, suit was concurrently dismissed by the two courts below. This Court finds that no substantial question of law arises in the present second appeal and the same is found to be devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.3 baweja/-