HEG%-i CGURT QF CHHATTIS$ARH AT BEL'ASPUR DlVismN BENm-i SQPAM: HQN’QLE 3%RE RgsiEEV GUPTA, CJ. 8: E=§GN’B§.E SHR! $UNIL KUMikR SINHA, J. M.C.C. Ng=£2$ 9f 2%4 £§FLE$ANW : Faz&¥ Haque, 8/0 Abdm Hague, aged ?%?E?%%NER abcut 37 years, Bus Operater, R/o Kharsia Naka, Ambikapur, Dhsti. Surguja. Versu§ NQ-AP?L§$ANT$ 1. State Transport Appetéate Tribunai, Raipur (CG) 2‘ RTA. Raipur, Wrcngiy wriiten in the petitian as STA. Raipur. 3. Mohammad Aiim, S/e Mehammad Ayub, Bus Operator, R/o Kharsia Naka, Ambikapur, Dist. Surgu}a (C.G.) 4‘ Mohammad Kayum, S/o Mohammad Ayub, Bus Operator, Rio Bargidih, Distt. Surguia (C.G.)- APPLECATEQN FOR CGRREC?EON 9F NAME EN THE GRgERiJUDGMENT DT, 24.9.§a% Wessn"; : Shri BP. Gupta, ieamed counse§ for the sst§iioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learned Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents Na. s & 2. Q R D E R (4m Sestsmber, 2§Q8§ The fsilowing emer of the Court was ‘passed by aeieev Qeeiag 63} Learned couneei forthe parties are heard. 2. The petit§oner is seeking eorrectien in {Che order dared 24—09—2034; passed in LP“ No.2890/2004. an *':r:. W A A M 3. The petiticner’s wrft petition Le. WP. No.28gG/2OD4 was disposed 0f w§th the foliowing direction: “Therefore, for the aforesaid raa$ons the petition of the petitioner deserves io be aiiowed and accordingly, it is aiioweci. The impugned order dated Q8.062OG4 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No.1 is hereby quashed and the order of the State Transport Authority dated 02.08.2003 (Annexure P—' ’i) granting permit to the petitioner is restored subject t0 the modification made by the teamed State Transport Appeiiate Tribunai in ite order dated 24.5.2004 (Annexure P—3 . Parties are ieft to bear thetr own eoet. Certitied copy as per ruies.” ‘4. that mention in the above quoted para that the order dated O2— 08—2003 {Annexure P-t) passed by ‘State Transport Authority’ oarne to be mentioned by mistake, whereas in fact, the said order was passed by‘the ‘R.T.A.’. 5. On a peruse! of Annexure P—1,.we are satisfied that mention of ‘State Transport Authority’ as the authority passing the order dated 02—08—2003 is required to be oorreotedby mentioning that the said order dated 02-08-2003 was passed by‘the ‘RTA’. e. By allowing the present petition, it is directed that the above quoted paragraph of the order dated 24—0g—g004, passed in WP. No.2890/2004 shaii stand oorreoted to the extent that reference to order dated 02-08-2003 as having been passed by Shri BF. Gupta, teamed oounsei for the petitioner submits the ‘St3te Tsvanspm Author&ty’ wouid be nsw treated as reference to the order having been passed by the ‘R.T ’ 5d!- ’/ \ . Sd/_ cHIEF JUSTICE i 7, \ Sunil Kumr Sinh Judge subbu FT” A a a\ 1 J§