IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26483 of 2009 1. RANGIR MAHTO 2. RENU DEVI 3. RAJ KISHORE MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 29/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are the family members of the husband of the deceased and the wife of one of them, apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 304B/34 of I.P.C. Considering unnatural death in three years of the marriage and that the father of petitioners 1 and 3 has been granted regular bail, this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to them. The application is rejected with regard to them. Considering that petitioner No.2 stands in the position of a daughter-in-law herself like the deceased with generalized allegations, let her surrender before the court below within four weeks when she shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Kurhni 2 (Turki O.P.) P.S. Case No.155/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. Any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioners-1 and 3 shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, including grant of regular bail to co-accused, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)