IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11535 of 2011 YOGESHWAR PANDIT, SON OF KAMAL PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and he is languishing in jail custody since 23.01.2011. The impugned order of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari is not clear as to how the name of this petitioner has been dragged in this case but contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation, it came to light that one Sim, said to be issued in the name of the petitioner, was used in the stolen mobile. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as a matter of fact, brother-in-law of the petitioner, who happens to be Nepali citizen, came to the petitioner and requested to get issue a Sim by providing the Identity Card of the petitioner and subsequently, the petitioner gave his Voter Identity Card to his brother-in-law and thereafter, Sim card was issued in the name of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No. 13 of 2008. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )