IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9591 of 2008 Decided on: 24.2.2011 Balbir Singh Pathania ……….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. ...….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) According to the contents of para 6(iii) in the reply, there is a proposal of amendment to the Recruitment and Promotion Rules of Librarian. The reply was filed by the State on 19.4.2004. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents-State to finalize the Recruitment and Promotion Rules of Librarian, as undertaken in para 6(iii) of the reply, if not already done. Till then, interim order dated 18.9.2003 shall continue. No costs. February 24, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.