IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.376 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 09.11.2006 Pushpa Rani ....Petitioner through Mr.Anurag Goyal, Advocate vs. Sh.Raj Kumar Rohilla & anr. ....Respondents through Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** SURYA KANT, J. The petitioner filed C.W.P.No.16128 of 2005 which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated October 06, 2005 with a direction that the respondents shall consider her claim for appointment in the light of various judgments which are referred to in the above-stated order. The needful was required to be done within a period of three months. Alleging non-compliance of the above-stated order, this contempt petition has been filed. In response to the show cause notice, reply by way of their respective affidavits have been filed by both the respondents. Along with his reply/affidavit, respondent No.2 has also appended a copy of the order dated 8.2.2006 which appears to have been sent to the petitioner on 5.6.2006 (Annexure R-1) whereby her claim for appointment to the post of J.B.T. Teacher has been duly considered and turned down on the ground that she being at Sr.No.266 in the over-all merit and at Sr.No.15 in the merit list of Scheduled Caste (B) Category, the petitioner's name stands C.O.C.P. No.376 of 2006 -2- beyond the number of advertised posts. In view of the fact that the petitioner's claim has been duly considered by the respondents, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the above-stated order before an appropriate forum, if so advised. Rule discharged. November 09, 2006 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE