[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 2412/2004 KALU RAM Vs. SITARAM & ORS. Date: 11.03.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Anoop Agarwal for the claimants-appellants. Mr. Tripurari Sharma for the respondents. **** The present civil misc. appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 is filed by the claimants-appellant for enhancement of compensation awarded vide impugned Award dated 06.08.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track No.3), Jaipur City, Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal') in Claim Petition No. 253/2004, by which the claim petition filed by the appellant has been partly allowed and compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,16,900/- has been awarded in favour of the claimant-appellant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the age if the injured appellant was 32 years at the time of accident and he was earning Rs. 25,000/- per month by transportation work. It is further contended that the appellant sustained injury in his leg and the operation of skin grafting was also undertaken and [2] because of the injuries, the appellant is unable to sit cross legged and is feeling difficulty in movement also and the Tribunal has utterly failed not to consider the income of the appellant as from the transportation business the appellant was earning Rs. 25,000/- per month at the time of the accident. It is also contended that because of the injuries the appellant received permanent disability which was assessed as 15.75%, but the Tribunal has granted a meagre amount of Rs. 1,16,900/- as compensation to the appellant which cannot said to be just and reasonable and the same deserves to be enhanced. I have heard rival submissions of the respective parties and carefully gone through the impugned Award dated 06.08.2004 passed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal while passing the impugned Award has thoroughly considered the income and the injuries sustained by the appellant and also considered the permanent disability received by the appellant and after considering each and every aspect, rightly awarded compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,16,900/- vide impugned Award dated 06.08.2004 and the same appears to be just and reasonable and requires no interference by this Court. No case of enhancement is made out. [3] Consequently, the present civil misc. appeal seeking enhancement of compensation, fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/