BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Ninth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9664 of 2011 1. C.R. KANAKAVALLI 2. C.R. POONGODIYAL @ POONGODI 3. G. SENTHILKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.2 to 4 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPATHUR TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.135/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.SUNDARAVADIVEL Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 366(A) IPC in Crime No.135 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Section 366(A) IPC. He would further submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (crl.Side) would submit that the victim girl has been secured. He would arrested and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case that the victim girl has been secured and the first accused has also been arrested and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur Sivagangai District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 09/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPPATHUR 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPATHUR TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. C.SUNDARAVADIVEL Advocate SR.No.26790 GH : 10.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9664 of 2011 Date :09/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/