IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19633 of 2010 1. DHARAN NATH THAKUR …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, VAISHALI 3. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, VAISHALI, HAJIPUR 4. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI, LALGANJ, DISTRICT VAISHALI 5. RAM NARAYAN THAKUR 6. AWADHESH THAKUR …. RESPONDENTS For the petitioner :Mr.Hare Krishna Kumar & :Mr.Amiya Kunal For the State :Mr. Manikant Mishra, G.P.21 & :Mr. Kinkar Kumar, A.C. to G.P.21 ----------- 02. 13.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 30.01.1999 (Annexure-3), passed on appeal being Appeal No.14M-A/92-93/16M-A/98-99 as also the order dated 23.07.2010, passed in Mutation Case No. R-30/99/2000. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while considering the matter relating to mutation, both the courts below, i.e. appellate court as well as the revisional court have considered the title respecting the land(s) and have recorded certain findings thereon. It is the submission of the petitioner that in a proceeding relating to mutation of the land(s), the courts are not required to go into the question of title and record any finding thereon. In that view of the matter, this Court while disposing 2 of the application, observes that any finding of title recorded in the order dated 30.01.1999 (Annexure-3) as also the revisional order dated 23.07.2010 (Annexure-4) shall not enure to the privilege/benefit of any of the parties in case appropriate remedy is sought in a competent civil court relating to land(s) in question. The application is accordingly disposed of. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )