1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JJDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.2510 of 2009. Nand Kishore Vs. State Date of Order :::: 22/07/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal By Post : Mrs. Rekha Madnani, Public Prosecutor for the State. By the Court : Perused the letter petition. This is a letter petition submitted by the accused- petitioner under Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (here-in-after to be referred as Parole Rules) for release him on parole. Heard learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused material placed on record. It is not disputed that the petitioner has completed 1/4th of his sentence, therefore, he is eligible for consideration of first regular parole as per rules. 2 According to the reply filed by the State, the District Social Welfare Officer, Jhalawar has recommended the parole, but the petitioner has only been declined parole on account of vague report of the Superintendent of Police, which in fact is vague in nature. It has been settled that merely on the basis of adverse Police report of the petitioner, the benefit of parole cannot be refused, as has been held by this Court in the case of Pappu Khan Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others, reported in 2006 (1) W.L.C. Page 31 and in the case of Paras Ram and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2001 (1) W.L.C. (Raj.) Page 429. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, we deem it fit to release the petitioner on first parole. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the petitioner may be released on first parole as per Rule 9 of the Parole Rules, subject to just and proper condition, which may be determined by the Superintendent of Central Jail, Kota. A copy of this order be sent to the Superintendent of Central Jail, Kota for immediate compliance. With the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Jitendra Ray Goyal) J. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/ 3 4