IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1555 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1555 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1555 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.937 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.937 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.937 OF 2006 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri C.G.Gavnekar for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : AUGUST 16, 2007. : AUGUST 16, 2007. : AUGUST 16, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent though the office noting shows that notice is duly served. The Applicant-Plaintiff has applied for temporary injunction during the pendency of the second Appeal. By order dated 06th July, 1998, temporary injunction was granted by the trial Court and the said order of temporary injunction was confirmed in an Appeal. However, there is nothing on record to show that temporary injunction was operating during pendency of Civil Appeal No.49 of 2005. 2. The Second Appeal has been admitted for final hearing. Considering the aforesaid aspects and the facts of the case, parties will have to ... 2 ... maintain status-quo as of today as regards possession. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by directing that the parties will maintain status-quo as of today as regards possession of the suit property till the final disposal of the Second Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE