THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.2703 OF 2006 Dated: 23.02.2006 Between: D. Srinivasa rao, R/o. Opposite M.R.O’s Office, Vissannapeta, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Vissannapeta Police Station, Krishna District & others. Respondents. HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.2703 OF 2006 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ petition is taken up on the basis of a fax message dated 8.2.2006 sent by the petitioner seeking to issue directions to the respondents to produce Manda Madhavi, Alias Sowmya, D/o. Harinadha Rao, Teacher, Sri Saraswathi Vidya Mandir, Vissannapeta who is stated to have been illegally detained by the police personnel of Vissannapeta Police Station, Krishna District. Petitioner also apprehends danger to the life of the alleged detenu at the hands of the respondent- authorities and therefore seeks appropriate directions to be issued to the respondents. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents wherein it is stated that on 8.2.2006 the police personnel, in fact, visited the house of one Mr. Ravi Shanker, accused in Crime No. 50/2005 on the file of the Women Police Station, Nalgonda, where they found that the alleged detenu was also residing with him. When the police people brought the alleged detenu to Vissannapeta Police Station to know the whereabouts of the said Ravi Shanker, one Mr. Narsi Reddy, Correspondent of Vikas College at Vissnnapet and several other local people have gathered at the police station and resisted them from discharging their duties and abused them in filthy language. Then they approached the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police, Vissannapet and lodged a complaint, which was registered as Crime No. 11/2006 for an offence punishable under Section 353 I.P.C. and Section 7(1) of Protection of Civil Rights Act. The alleged detenu was produced before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Thiruvuru on 8.2.2006 and subsequently she was released on furnishing of personal bond on the same day. In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ___________________ T. Meena Kumari,J Date: 23.2.2006 _____________ K.C. Bhanu,J pnb