THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A. No.2988 of 2000 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed three suits, namely O.S.Nos.15, 16 and 18 of 1989 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Razole against different individuals for the relief of recovery of possession of immovable properties. The suits were dismissed for default on 24.11.1992. Therefore, the appellant filed I.A.Nos.38, 39 and 40 of 1993 in the three suits under Order IX Rule 9 C.P.C. with a prayer to set aside the default orders passed on 24.11.1992. Through a common order, dated, 23.08.1999, the trial Court dismissed the applications. This appeal arises out of the order passed in I.A.No.40 of 1993. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents. Feeling aggrieved by the common order, dated 23.08.1999, and another similar order, the appellant filed four appeals in all. C.M.A.Nos.1270 and 2971 of 1999 and 527 of 2000 filed by the appellant were allowed on 16.10.2003. It is not in dispute that the present appeal stands on the same footing. Hence, the appeal is allowed and the order under appeal is set aside. Consequently, I.A.No.40 of 1993 is allowed, as a result of which, O.S.No.18 of 1989 is restored to file. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit as early as possible, if necessary by clubbing with the other suits, if they are pending. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:07.09.2009 kdl