i-HGH COURT OF CHI-EATISGARH. BILAEPUR “LP. IS! No. 7588 of 2G07 RE$PONDENTS a. Tne nxec Lmve bngmeer PETITEONER Sarvan Veima, agac‘i about 6O yams, $fo lats Shri Jhumuk Verma, RIO Viliage Parteva. ?ost Dwxi, Tahsil. Rajim, Disti. Raipur {c.G). VefSus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretmy, Water Rasohrces Department, D . K. $. Bhavan, Raipur (c.G.). 2. The Sub—Divisional Ofticer, ‘Pain' Camal Water Resources Sub Bivision No.2, Panduka, Diett. ainur (f‘ G) Watew Reqnurcee \ Department ’G—an'yabamd, Distt. Ralpul (p G) WRIT FETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGESTETUTION OF INDEA Appearance: Shn RP. Sahu with Shn‘ S.P. Sahu, Counsel for the petiticners. Ku. Sum'ta Jam, Panel Lawyer, for the State] reepondents on advance copy. GRAL GREEK (20.12.2007) svmL xvMAR SINHA, J, Hearci. Learned counsel tor the petmoner submlts that a permanent Gang man ls to be reared at the age oi o2 veals 1n accordamce w1th the Chm, tiegaih slutslciya bevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhz'm'yam i967 read with Fumiamental Rules, 56. He also‘submits thai The point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. WP. No. 108f 2005 and many other Connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported 1'11 R 2007 I2) C.G.L‘.J. 23? {Govimi & Gthers vs. State of (LG. anq‘ a \ T / 2 W.P.('S) No.7588 of 2007 others) and this mattér is squarely coveréd by that dacision, which may be disposed ofon the same terms. Leamued counsei for the State fairly agrees that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits that in some matters the State has filed wxit appeals. Unless some inten‘m order is passed. me'rely on account of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition cannot be kept in abeyance, when the matter is squareiy covered by the said judgment. In the result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in WP. No. 108/ 2GO5 and other comected matters. No orde as to cost. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha , Judge \\ r