IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13426 of 2004 RUPAM SINGH W/0 Sri Devendra Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Ramsain, Ward No. 6, P.O. Barahia, P.S. Barahia, District- Lakhisarai. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Under Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger. 6. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 7. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Lakhisarai. 8. The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Barahia, District- Lakhisarai. 9. Md. Khuaza Jamal Nasir, the Executive Officer, Barahia, District- Lakhisarai. 10. Shri Shashank Shekhar Sharma, the Accounts Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Barahia, District- Lakhisarai. ----------- 5. 18.04.2011 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances raised in the present proceeding, a representation was filed by the petitioner before respondent District Magistrate, Lakhisarai as far as back as on 2.6.2004 vide Annexure-12. Despite the aforesaid representation neither the grievances raised on behalf of the petitioner has been redressed nor an appropriate action has been taken against the guilty officials. He submits that respondent District Magistrate be directed to look into the valid grievances of the 2 petitioner and if required, corrective measures may be directed to be taken by the District Magistrate or any other competent officer of the respondent State. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is hereby directed to file an appropriate representation before respondent District Magistrate, Lakhisarai within a period of four weeks from today raising all her grievances there in that representation. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner within the time prescribed by this Court, with a certified copy of the present order, the respondent District Magistrate shall be obliged to consider the same in accordance with law and shall further be obliged to dispose of the same after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all other concerned persons within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. It may be noted that this Court has not gone in to merit of the claims of the petitioner and that is required to be decided by respondent District Magistrate in accordance with law by a speaking order. It is made clear that if no such representation is filed by the petitioner within the time prescribed by this Court with a certified copy of 3 the preset order then it shall be construed that present writ petition has finally been rejected by this Court. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Anand Kr. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)