m m m W m\\r+9L§J.m:§%<§T 0 ”[200 Mmmm WW fE€rm $WW SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan 15-03-201 1 Shri Siddharth Rathod, counse None appears on behalf of t round. Heard. This petition Was filed by the refusal on the part of respondent No. petitioner in the subject Basic Electric Learned counsel for the petitir pendency of the petition, the petiti supplementary examination, which pursuing his studies. In that View of the matter, l an questions involved in the present cz right to revaluation or not. However, to be taken on the petitioner on that t the petition. The petition is accordingly c infructuous. Tumane Shrivastava, J. for the petitioner. 1e respondents, even in the second petitioner aggrieved on account of 1 to revaluate the answer sheet of the al Engineering (Semester-l). )ner however submits that during the aner was allowed to appear in the she cleared and thereafter, sh 1 not inclined to go into the academic Ise as to whether the petitioner had n case, any adverse action is sought asis, she would be at liberty to revive ismissed as having been rendered Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge {Hts €fia'a e