CR No. 143/2008 3.11.2009 Present: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 & 4 to 13. Mr.Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.14. The operation of the impugned orders dated 25.6.2008, 1.7.2008 as also 16.7.2008 were stayed by this Court on 31.7.2008. On 19.8.2009, this Court had directed the petitioners to maintain the accounts and supply the copy of the same to the respondents before the next date which was 30.10.2009. The orders have not been complied with by the petitioners. That apart the Court below had only directed the Receiver appointed by the District Judge in terms of orders dated 23.3.2001 to take possession of the suit premises from the present petitioners who were also directed to deposit a sum of Rs.14,000/- per annum w.e.f. 2002. In terms of orders dated 16.7.2008, the Court below had directed one Smt. Budhi Devi to deposit a sum of Rs.97,440/- received by her from the E.T.O. Kullu, with the Receiver. The same has also not been done. The only ground of challenge made out is that the Court below had passed the impugned orders without any record. The orders passed have been perused. For the purpose of deciding the application, there was sufficient material on record before the Court as disclosed in the application by the receiver. The Court had simply directed the amount to be deposited with the Receiver which was in reiteration of earlier orders. For all the aforesaid reasons, I find no merit in the present petition and the same is accordingly dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. November 3, 2009 (rana)