WPMS No. 1887 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Gopal K. Verma, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents-plaintiff is a practising Advocate in the Judgeship of Dehradun and had obtained an ex-parte injunction from the lower appellate court which is continuing. On account of him being an Advocate, the plaintiff is seeking undue adjournment. In support of his submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the complete ordersheet of the suit. From the perusal of the ordersheet, the court finds that innumerable adjournments have been taken by the plaintiff. Considering the aforesaid fact coupled with the fact that an ex-parte temporary injunction is operating against the defendant and that the suit is of the year 2005, the Court directs the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously within one year from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order. The writ petition is disposed of. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 09.11.2010 Shiv