@ ^N» (>. !N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BBLASPUR W,P,iO N0. S^A J2M1 PETmONERS ^ :1. Deepak Kumar singh S/o Ram Chandra Singh, aged about 26 years, R/o Near Odgi Naka, Baikunthpur, P.S. & Tahsi! ^ ..••'\A- ^"^•^...- Baikunthpur, Distt. Koria (C.G.) ?••• ^''\c.$* 2. Rajendra Kumar Singh S/o Ram ••"<^V"^M" Dayai Singh, aged about 28 years, ^••-yy <?<^ ^ R/o Viilage Krishnapur, P.S. Jainagar, TahsiS Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3.' Shiv Kumar Singh S/o Ramdeo Singh, aged about 28 years, R/o Village Salka, Patratoii, P.S. Garima, Tahsi! Amblkapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 4. Saroj Kumar Sidar S/o Nriplal Sidar, aged about 28 years, R/o ViSiage Kasaipali, Tahsii Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 5. ^ Surajmani Parja, S/o Karamsai Parja, aged about 37 years, R/o Village Vijaypur, Tahsii Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS \" RESPONDENTS c^ : 1 .^ Sfate of Chhattlsgarh Through the Secretary Department of Technical Education, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Directorate of Technical Education Government of Chhattisgarh Women Polytechnic Premises, Byron Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ChhattisgarhSwamiVivekanand Technicai University Through the Chancellor North Park Avenue, Sector-8, Bhiial, Dlstrict- Durg (C.G.) The Prindpal Government Polytechnic Co!lege, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 5. The Prindple Kirodimal Government Polytechnic Coilege, Raigarh (C.G.) WRST PETITJON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTSTUTION OF ^ .HIOH COIJRT OF CHHATTT8GARH AT BTIA8PUR PETITIONERS RE8PONDENTS WRITPETITIQN (C>No. 5660 of2011 Deepak Kamar Smgh & Others. VRRSIJ8 StMe ofChhattissarh & Otliers. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ne Siirl Satish K. Agniliotri, J. 'Present: 2. 3. 4. Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate fbrthe petitioner. Amn Sao, Goveniinerit.Advocate fbrtiie State/resposident No. 1, 2,4 and 5. O'RDER (Passed on 23rd day of September, 2011) Leamed couxisel a.ppearisig for the petitioner on isistmctions, seeks permission of -feis Court to witfadra-w ttds petitioii willi liberty to make a. fresh a.pplication to the resnondent-Umversity in the light ofthe commimioat.ion dated 14JO;2010 (Arm.cxuTe P/3)< Lea-med coimsel appearing for o&er side has no objection. It is ordered accordmgly. Coi^eqiiently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn witli tlie aforestated observation^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit