WP(C) 1226/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr PN Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also he ard Ms VL Singh, the learned GA, appearing for the State respondents No. 1,2,4,5 ,6,7,8 and 9, and Ms B Sarma, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 10. On perusing the pleadings of the petitioners along with the annexures, n o case for the interference of this Court is made out and as such this writ peti tion is being disposed of at the Admission stage. The impugned letter is dated 02.03.2009 wherein it has been stated that the petitioner had constructed a A/T commercial house, measuring 144 sq ft (appr oximately) in size under the Dibrugarh Master Plan Area in contravention of Mast er Plan/Development Scheme and Zoning Regulation which has not been removed by h im inspite of notice served upon him. The impugned letter, therefore, directed the petitioner under Section 30-B(1) of the Assam Town & Country Planning Act, 1 959 to remove the construction made by him over the said land by demolishing the same within thirty days from the date of receipt of this impugned letter failin g which the demolition would be done at his own cost and expenses. I have asked the learned counsel for the petitioner time and again to sh ow me any documents evidencing his right of interest in the disputed structure, but in vain. Under the circumstances, this writ petition has absolutely no merit and is liable to be dismissed at the threshold. The writ petition is accordingly dis missed. The interim order passed earlier also stands vacated. No cost.