IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10409 of 1990 Date of decision: February 08, 2011 Punjab State Tubewell Corporation Limited .. Petitioner Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhatinda and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Varinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shikha Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. A.N. Jindal, J Affidavits of Kaur Sain- respondent No.3 and Labh Singh- respondent No.4, filed today in the court, are taken on record. The petitioners- workmen have been re-instated by the petitioner- Corporation pursuant to the impugned award dated 14.12.1989 published on 18.5.1990 (Annexure P-9). As they have been now working with the petitioner- Corporation for nearly 20 years, learned counsel for the petitioner- Corporation submits that he will not press this writ petition if the issue with regard to back-wages is answered in favour of the petitioner- Corporation. Learned counsel for the respondents-workmen has made a separate statement that the respondents-workmen will not press the issue with regard to back-wages. In view of the above the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it would be subject to the condition that the petitioner-Corporation need not pay any back wages to the respondents- workmen. February 08, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge