1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 200 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 200 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 200 OF 2006 Indrayani Kesarinath Pitale ... Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Gautam Mehta with Mr. S.M. Kazi for Petitioner. Mrs. S. Ajitkumar for Respondent Nos 1 to 3. Mr. B. Shroff, Special Counsel for R. No. 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 P.C. . It is the grievance of the Petitioner that he has been allotted final plot No. 842 as shown in Exh. A to the Petition. There are some structures standing thereon which the Corporation has not yet taken any steps to remove. The Corporation is bound to give possession of the final plot in favour of the Petitioner in terms of the statutory duty as cast on the Corporation. Considering the above, the respondent Corporation is directed to hand over possession of Plot No. 842 free from incumberances to the Petitioner within six months from today. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)