1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2139 OF 2009 1. Navalkishor B Agarwal and ors .. Petitioners Vs 1.Rupee Co-operative Bank Ltd and ors .. Respondents Mr. Prasad S Dani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kishor V Tembe, Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr S.N.Patil, AGP for respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 28/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against an order dated 20.8.2008 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune, Division Pune, allowing the application filed by respondent no.1 for condonation of delay in filing Revision Application No.439 of 2007. The revision was directed against the order dated 18.8.2006 passed by the Assistant Registrar, Co- operative Societies Pune, rejecting the application filed by respondent no.1 seeking cancellation of corrigendum dated 29.3.2001. It appears that Writ Petition No.1757 of 2006 was T 2 filed in this court challenging the order dated 13.9.2005 passed in Revision Application No.78 of 2005 arising from an order of remand dated 13.9.2005. By the order impugned in the revision, the application for setting aside the correction was directed to be reheard. The writ petition was disposed of on 5.10.2007 by the following order. “The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition because on the basis of impugned order, the Assistant Registrar has already completed the enquiry and passed certain order and now remedy of revision against that order is available to the petitioner/bank. Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn. All the contentions of the parties are left open to be taken up before the appropriate authority in the appropriate proceeding.” In view of this, there was delay in filing Revision Application no.439 of 2007. The Divisional Joint Registrar, after considering the aforementioned facts and also the order of this court in Writ Petition No.1757 of 2006, condoned the delay in filing the revision. That order is impugned in the instant writ petition. I have perused the impugned order so also the other material placed before the court. In my opinion, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order deserves no interference by this court under Article 227 of the Constitution 3 of India. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune, Division Pune, shall endeavour to dispose of Revision Application No.439 of 2007 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)