IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 LA.App..No. 200 of 2009(D) -------------------------- LAR.2/2000 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MAVELIKARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT & 2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- 1. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR,CORAKKATTU VEETTIL, CHEPPAD VALIYAKUZHI MURI, REP.BY JAYALEKSHMI G. NAIR,POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF GOPALAKRISHNAN - NAIR. 2. N.T.P.C. ADV. SRI.K.ANAND, SC NTPC THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.200 of 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Smt.Latha representing K.Anand, learned Standing Counsel for the requisitioning authority submits that for reducing litigational costs, a policy decision has been taken by the requisitioning authority that no appeals should be preferred by the authority where the enhancement is more or less at the rates granted under the impugned judgment. Under the above circumstances, we dismiss this appeal. However, it is made clear that this judgment will not be quoted as a precedent for any other case. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk