IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 28.01.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P. Nos.23065 and 23068 OF 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2009 A.Vijayaka ... Petitioner in W.P.No.23065 of 2009 V.Premalatha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.23068 of 2009 Versus 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Central I, New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals I), New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle I (2) New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. .. Respondents in W.P.Nos.23065 and 23068 of 2009 PRAYER IN W.P.NO.23065 OF 2009: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in C No.1571/49-55/C-I/2009-10 and to quash the order dated 06.10.2009 and direct the first respondent to grant absolute and unconditional stay of collection of tax demand and interest relating to the assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 pending disposal of the appeals before the second respondent. PRAYER IN W.P.NO.23068 OF 2009: Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in C No.1571/35-41/C-I/2009-10 and to quash the order dated 07.10.2009 and direct the first respondent to grant absolute and unconditional stay of collection of tax demand and interest relating to the assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 pending disposal of the appeals before the second respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioners : Mr.P.Rameshkumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Subramanian COMMON ORDER Today, when these writ petitions were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners have submitted that these writ petitions have become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and in view of the endorsement made, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. arr To 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax Central I, New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals I), New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle I (2) New No.46, Old No.108, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2 ccs to Mr.R.Sivaraman, Advocate, SR. 5390 and 5393 1 cc to Mr.K. Subramaniam, Advocate, SR. 5160 W.P. Nos.23065 and 23068 OF 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2009 NM (CO) kk 24/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/