WP(C) 1474/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioners are aggrieved by their non -selection in the recruitment process for appointment to the post of constables in the CRPF in pursuant to th e Advertisement No. 1 of 2008 (Annexure-1) . The Respondents have filed their co unter affidavit on 19.04.2010 showing that none of the petitioners barring petit ioner No.21 Mr. Udhab Thakuria, had secured the required cut-off marks in their respective categories, for being considered for appointment. The total marks sec ured by each of the petitioners and the cut-off marks in each category are state d by the Respondents in the counter affidavit. From the above averments, it is clear that no enforceable is available w ith the petitioners for getting appointment as constables. However, as regards t he candidature of the petitioner No.21, Mr. Udhav Thakuria is concerned, as he s ecured cut off marks 42 in the Schedule Caste category, his case is different fr om the other petitioners. If the cut-off marks entitle the petitioner No.21 to r eceive appointment, the Respondents may consider such appointment as per norms i n force. Since, it is submitted by Mr. N Bora, learned A.S.G.I., that if equal m arks are secured by several candidates, appointments are to be made by having re gard to the age and other factors , it would not been on available vacancies. Having regard to the above, this requisition is disposed of by the direc tion on consideration of the case of the petitioner No.21 as per norms applicabl e. The claims given by the petitioners are dismissed.