3:5^' ^TPn^q', ®TTwis,Rf<7>l«y l3 (n.A.Mo.lO^A00^ ^INdl sb^l* W^ 200 ; sii^r^ R;-ii* gw sii^r **<i4 In 31I^?T'^?; C'pf^^I) ?'RITWBfOT SII^T MISC. AlPPEAL N0. 1048/2005 APPELLANT RESPONDENTS Non-applicants Before : Hoa'ble Shrl Dh 11-5-2007 Shri Asliok Kuniar Shri Santosh Bhars Heard. TIie claiaiaat/'appl Section 173 of tlie Moto dated 4-5-2007 passed u by the 4th Additioiial M Surajpur, Distt. .Surguja awarded to hun as compe in. the acciderit dated 30 ^ii<iT<rrahi 'ITFtl^ ^'fe^' <(^it$i< ^ sff^T 3n^?T aajay, son ofAkalu Rani, Caste Hadjaa, ^ed about 04 years, Minor tjaroiigh -lardian. father Akaluram, son ofNansay, aste- Harijau, R/o. village Kaskela, P.S. aiiiagar, Talisil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja ;-&) ERSUS DiIbUaraa, S/;o. CHtruraa., agfed abQut 20 years, R/o, viUage Kaskela, P.S. Jauiagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Suiyya (C.G.) (DRIVER) i Ghiiran, S/o. Moti, R/o. village Kaskela, P.S. Jaiaagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surgiya (C.Gij (OWNER) . : breadraMisbra, J. M ihukla, Advocate for fhe appeUaiijfcl t,Advocate for the respondent Nq. |2. .pplj.caiit has preferred fhis appeaS.il.uadeir t- Vehicles Act, 1988 against fhe: [ ^M'ana) i Motor Acciderrt Oaim Case No. ] U^QQ^ otor Accident Clauns Triibmial j(y.|T|a^ wllfireby a suin of Rs. 5,000/- Ua^| J d: J ':!i nsation for tiie iujuries sustauiedfjiiy |iim. -4-2001 iiivolving Motor GyclejiRei d. 1;No XI-HG—78 'F55! '^WW-tf, fnS'WI'c, Rf?ll<Hy ; ^.A-r4&. J|04§;^&&5- KI*<<»11 *NI* -••----•••-•---"••--•""---^200 an^?r ^PB C^?^^) /^ isn^r?^ RMW) Rlsi'^ra WllK s<fli^IT flfea 3IT^?T < Z-- MP 27/9054 bwued by th( negUgently by responden'tj Learaed counsel foit has sustaiued grievous iiapugned awai-d aad he 2001 to 8-4-2001 ia advised X-ray aad even m.eager sum of Rs. 5,000| aad, therefoi^, the am^ enIiaaGed. On fh.e ofher hanil submits that fhere is nd claiman.t suffered grievoil clauned iu fhe petition. T11 avaflable on record hasl claunant. I have heard leameil record. After perusuig the fhat the appeUaat was accident itselfie. 30-4-2(] to 8-4-3001. Dr. Saiijay exam.iaed, bed head ticli| proved. Apart froin the expenses have also tfri^Id'41'i f^^i ^^^ <f^i*$i< ^T 'aifq^ <HI$?[ respondent No. 2 and driven rasUy; aud 'No. 1. I th.e appeUant subinits that the appeUant injuries descnbed ui para 10 of! the i^as hospitalized for fhe period froin 3D-4- Di^trict Hospital, Ambikapur and he |was fb.en the leamed Tribunal has awarded a y- as com.pensation which is iaadequate t>unt of conipensation deseryes to be |l, leanied courtsel for the respondents evidence available on record thatl the i^.s iajuries or he in.curred expenses as T4e Tribunal after considering the evideuce awarded a just coinpeusatkiu to | fhe iR. counsel for the parties and perusejdl the 1 ! ; ef/idence available on record, it is obseijved (diaitted ia the hospital on the (late|of |01 and rem.ained there for treatm.eB.lj u@ fripafhi who is ta-eatuig doctor has ib[epn et of the appeUaat has been filedi ;aad atjove evideuce, receipts towards treal bee^i filed. Th.us lookiag to the periqd| jof \^\ K B'^ [fii ^l^ ^ IS^ IBSIIIIli IK XI-HG—78 'Svcl "L||<<|0<|, 8)TTl'M'IS, Rlrtiyy •1f"^ '.. ^.A-NO, ID^Q/^O?~~ Nltirtl *<4i* -•--"--•--•—•••-----•••"•-•g^ 200 ant?r t|9R; ('j»i(-i«i<{tT) lf~ :?ij^r ^r l<;-ii'ti ^V sn^y *H K. ?«iiqn•^f?d sn^r -3- hospitalizatipu, .tUe natur^. would b.e just and proper) by the Tribunal, Rs, 5,000( ' The appeal is a( coinpeasation is eiLhance4 acuium. from..the date of ta aDd severefy liable to sa.ti.^1 witiiin a period of'two'iaoi]|ths Qf BijurDss suffered by the appeB^iit, it |that in addition to Rs. 5,000/- awarded - inore be awarded to ftie claimanti |;cordiD.gly allowed. The amount of to Rs. 10,000/- wifh iiiterest @ 6% per ^pp3ieati®n.The respondents are jojnfly fy ffi& award. The awarded suni bd paid froin.today. <M<lI<vl*ill ^MV^^^-^ <^1<$1< ^sifwaii^i Sd/- DHffiENDRA MISHRA Judge