IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 131 of 2009 Madhu Baliyan. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. .……… Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Pujari, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Compounding Application No. 545 of 2009 has jointly been filed by both the parties and is supported by the individual, separate affidavits of the petitioner as well as respondent No. 2. On behalf of the petitioner, Sri Pramod Baliyan, husband, is present and respondent No. 2 is also present in person. Since the parties have compromised, Compounding Application No. 545 of 2009 is allowed. The offences are compounded with the resultant consequence that Criminal Misc. Application No. 131 of 2009 is allowed and the proceedings are quashed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 22.05.2009 G