THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 136 of 2006 Oral order: Aggrieved by the action of the respondents-AP CPDCL in not considering the cases of the petitioners for regularization, they filed the present writ petition. It is the case of the petitioners that they are working with the respondents as contract labour since 15 years, and they having put in more than 240 days of service in a year, are entitled to be regularized, but the action of the respondents in not regularizing their services, is illegal and arbitrary. Though notice before admission was ordered as far back as on 04.01.2006, till date no counter is filed, nor any instructions are reported in the matter by the respondents. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-AP CPDCL. In similar facts situation, a learned Judge of this Court by order dated 20.09.2004, passed in W.P. No. 17070 of 2004, directed the petitioners therein to make appropriate representation for regularization of their services, and if any such representation is made, the respondents shall consider and dispose of the same and pass appropriate orders. Hence, following the said judgment, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition also with the following directions: The petitioners are directed to make appropriate representation to the respondents to regularize their services, and if any such representation is made, the respondents shall consider and dispose of the same as per the existing rules, and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 6th July, 2006. KSR