(^ \ff^ % IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTSGARHl PETITIONER ...•^ ^ /y ^%/ ^^Sf ^f<^y' ^^y'- ^4'y "<y RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) No.^93?'0f2010 Praveen Sharma, Age 49 years S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Occupation- Dismissed fro.m the Post of Deputy Business Manager Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Raipur R/o B-301, Maruti Hights, G.E.Road District- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of food and consumer Affaires, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through its Managing Director, Bal Ashrara Parisar Kutchery Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 3. General Manager, (Administration) Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur 4. K.K. Bakshi, (Enquiry Officer) Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk^Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA <n»idr^»Hi<»> 'T^ ^ww^, fs^ww, [®i<nt<H^< ^,..^:£^J..|M<?:..£t.a^^ 200 \^^ 3TI^TTR^ (^rf35f^T) W^T ^)T f<^Joh ^T^TT ^H^T ^TRT^F ^ t~ 1-. ^ F^TTW ^rf^cT 3Tf^T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTiCE MR. PRITil 08-09-2010: thle Mr. J.N. Nande, counsei for Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. G. A. fo| Shri Narendra Vyas, counsel Challenge in the present writ passed by the Managing Director, Limited, Raipyri.toy which pena!ty of r|ar and an amount of Rs.1,33,08,9841/- petitloner. Counse! for the parties do not remedy of appea!, which has been t^ with appiication for grant ofstay. In this view of the matter, i an1 this stage. Learned counsel for res appeai fiied by the petitioner sh^ application for stay shaii aiso be cons !n view of the submissiohs respondents, this petition is finail respondent No. 2 (competent appe!! appeal as also appilcatlon for stay, e^ l|or betition is to the order dated 25.6.2010 ?.G. State C'ivj! Supplies Corporation r|amovai from service has been imposed F- is said to be recovered from the |dispute that there exists an aitemative l^ken recourse to by fiiing appea! along '5FP^pff;T ^R^ff ^^fe^ <P»l^l< '^'3tfW 3T1^T ^KERDIWAKER petitioner. the State/respondent No. 1. respondents No. 2 to 4. not inciined toentertain this-petltion at Ipondents No. 2 to 4 states that the |i ~be decided expedjtiousjy and the Mdered and decided atthe eariiest. made by iearned couns.ei for disposed of with the direction to ^te authority) to decide the petitioner's ^pedltiousjy vvjthin a reasonable time. I. ] Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge