AB 621/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE PK MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A.K.Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr B.S.Sinha, lear ned Add. P.P., Assam. Case diary has been produced. I have perused the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the peti tioner is working in the State Bank of India and presently posted at Diphu Branc h. Although FIR was lodged by the Branch Manager of State Bank of India, Goreswa r Branch against the accused/petitioner alleging unauthorized money transaction, he has not been placed under suspension. It is quite surprising as to why the I.O. has not persua ded the matter for recording the statements of the petitioner to get clarificati on on the alleged transaction which has been questioned. I am of the considered view that there is no chance of absconding and/or jumping the bail if the pre ar rest bail is granted to the petitioner, in asmuch as, he is an employee of the B ank. In view of the above, I direct that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, Sri Subhash Chandra Koch shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 30,00 0/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresti ng authority in connection with Goreswar P.S.Case No. 96/10 U/s 420/406 IPC, on the condition that the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. within 10 days fr om today for interrogation and recording his statement in accordance with law. The bail application stands disposed of.