HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 1250 of 2009 Date: 16-12-2010 Between: Naredla Narasaiah ………… Petitioner And Vabilishetty Koteswara Rao …… Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No. 1250 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is the judgment debtor who invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of C.P.C., inter alia, seeking to assail the order, dated 10-02-2009 in E.P.No.30 of 2002 in O.S.No.6 of 1990 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Mahabubabad, whereby the arrest of the petitioner was ordered in the execution proceedings, which has been laid for recovery of the amounts in pursuance of the decree obtained by the respondent-decree holder. In the said application, the Court below, after contesting and after holding a regular enquiry, held that the petitioner has got sufficient means, but he refused and neglected to discharge the decree debt. Hence, ordered for arrest. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material, it is seen that the finding of fact that the petitioner, having sufficient means, refused and neglected to discharge the decree debt cannot be interfered by this Court especially where nothing has been pointed out as to how the said finding is perverse. Hence, I do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the petitioner is permitted to pay the stipulated amount within a period of three months from today. It is also made clear that in case of default, the order of arrest already passed by the Court below may be executed. No order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J Date: 16-12-2010 YCR