IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22385 of 2011 Congress Yadav Son of Bhubneshwar Yadav, Resident of village- Chhoti govind pur Fulka, P.S- Jamalpur, Dist- Munger Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 17.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Dharahra P.S.Case No. 36/2011 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R enlarge against unknown nor any looted articles were recovered from the possession of the petitioner has not put in T.I. Parade. It has also been submitted that name of the petitioner has come only in the confessional statement of the co-accused Sanjeet Kumar and the petitioner is in custody since 14.3.2011. The learned APP submits that in para 36 of the case diary it appears that recovery was made in quarter No.688D of Dawalatpur Railway Colony, which is said to be illegally occupied by the petitioner but nothing in the diary to show about the identification of recovered articles and petitioner also has not put on T.I.Parade whereas informant has claimed to identified 2 the culprits. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner abovenamed , is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Dharahra P.S. Case No. 36/2011 with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)