1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. APPLN. NO. 788 OF 2009 (SHESHRAO.. Vs.. THE CHIEF OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ A. S. Jaiswal, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JULY 30, 2009. This is an application for review of the order dated 1st November 2007 whereby the second appeal was dismissed. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the Trial Judge, First Appellate Judge as well as this Court held that applicant could not prove how he became the owner of the property. The learned counsel for the applicant states that he wants to produce the sale deed on record. The same could not be produced though given to counsel in trial court itself. Since the sale deed was not taken into consideration while passing the order, a review would be justified. Now, this is a very strenuous way of looking at the things. Even if viewed thus, it is not clear that as to how 2 the applicant would be able to make out the case for review showing that the document in question was not produced because of circumstances beyond his control. This shows that this is a case of want of due diligence. Therefore no case for review is made out. Application is rejected. JUDGE nvt.