IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO C.R.P.NO.5511 OF 2002 Date:14.10.2011 Between:- The State of A.P., represented by the Authorized Officer, Land Reforms, Kakinada. ..Petitioner And Vatturu Ganga Rao .. Respondent ORDER:- Aggrieved by the order, dated 04.11.1993, passed by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, East Godavari, Kakinada in L.R.A.No.3 of 1988, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 2. The petitioner herein/appellant is the State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Authorized Officer, Land Reforms, Kakinada. The learned Government Pleader fairly conceded that the appellants in L.R.A.No.3 of 1988 are the statutory tenants in possession of the properties and they may be continued, as ordered by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal in the impugned order. 3. Now the point for consideration is: “Whether the impugned order is sustainable?” 4. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Tribunal, on perusal of the documents covered by Exs.C-1 to C-4, held that the respondents/appellants are cultivating tenants of Ac.1.15 cents of land in Survey No.581/4 of Kajuluru village and that respondent No.1 was granted patta to an extent of Ac.0.33 cents and the remaining Ac.0.82cents of land in same survey number was assigned to one M.Veerraju, B.Subbayamma and K.Ranganayakulu and they are also the cultivating tenants of the said land under the declarant. The impugned order also further reads that the said land is said to have been accepted towards surrender by the State and the tenants are entitled to continue as cultivating tenants under the State by attorning to the State on payment of proportionate rent to the Government. It is also made clear in the impugned order that from out of Ac.1.15cs of land in survey No.581/4 of Kajuluru village, the first appellant is entitled to continue and enjoy as pattadar in respect of Ac.0.33 cents, and that in respect of the remaining Ac.0.82cents in the said survey number, the appellants 1 and 2 are entitled to continue as cultivating tenants under the State on payment of proportionate rent to the Government. Therefore, in any view of the matter, the finding in the impugned order is sustainable in view of the possession and enjoyment of the said land by the cultivating tenants. Hence, I see no grounds to differ the finding of the appellate Court and the same is fairly conceded by the learned Government Pleader. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _​________________________ JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO 14th October, 2011. AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO C.R.P.NO.5511 OF 2002 Date:14.10.2011 AMD