1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1041/2008 (Sanjay Yoginder Mehra Vs. Central Information Commission and ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 12, 2008. Heard Mr. Rizwy for the petitioner. Writ petition is directed against the order passed by the authority under the Right to Information Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the information which is required, has not been supplied to the petitioner and the order passed by the authorities have not taken into consideration the right of the petitioner to receive the information which he has prayed for. We have considered the contentions canvassed and perused the 2 order dated 13th February, 2007 passed by the Information Commissioner, which demonstrates that the petitioner is advised to seek inspection of the relevant documents so as to clearly specify the information required by him. It is also observed that both the parties should mutually decide the date and time convenient for inspection of the record. In view of the above referred decision, it is open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in this regard. However, in our view, no case is made out to show any indulgence. Writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RMP