IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION CAF NO.2624/2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1173/2009 SMT. SUHASINI NIMGAONKAR & ANOR ..VS.. DR. RAJENDRA KAMBLE Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 13 /10 / 2010 Heard Shri Vaidya, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Dhole the learned counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the sale deed has been executed in favour of the respondent during the pendency of this first appeal. However, according to learned counsel for the applicant, the possession of the suit property is with the applicant. The fact that the applicants are in possession of the suit property is not disputed. In such circumstances, it would be necessary to protect the possession of the applicant over the suit property during the pendency of the first appeal, as the first appeal has been admitted on 16.10.2010. The possession of the applicant over the suit property is protected, The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE SMP.