IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1012 of 2011 Pawan Kumar Adarsh, son of Krishna Nandan Prasad @ Krishnanandan Prasad Yadav resident of village- Lodipur, P.S.- Pakribarawan District- Nawada. .. Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar … Opp. Party. ----------- 4. 26.09.2011 The accused- petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order dated 16.7.2011 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Cr.(Juvenile) Appeal No. 34 of 2011 by which the order dated 1.4.2011 passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Biharsharif in JJB Case No. 15 of 2011 arising out of Laheri P. S. Case No. 16 of 2011 under Sections 363,365, 364(A) I.P.C. has been confirmed and the appeal has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been declared a juvenile and his prayer for bail was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Cr. Appeal No. 34 of 2011 which has been dismissed by the impugned order on the ground that there is possibility that 2 the released of the petitioner would bring him into association of criminals/bad peoples. It is further submitted that on similar facts and circumstances, co-accused- Amit Kumar has been granted bail by this court vide order dated 25.8.2011 in Cr. Revision No. 894 of 2011. The petitioner has been in custody since 1.3.2011. It has also been submitted that the report of Probation Officer has already been received which shows that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and there is no material on record to show that if the petitioner is released, he will go into the association of any known criminals. Learned A.P.P. for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the prayer. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and on perusal of material on record, it appears that the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is correct. There is nothing on record to show that if the petitioner is released, he will go into the association of any known criminals. Considering the facts and circumstances, in my opinion, the impugned 3 order is not fit to be sustained. It is set aside. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with J.J.B. Case No. 15 of 2011 arising out of Laheri P. S. Case No. 16 of 2011 with following conditions;- (i) One of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. (ii) The father of the petitioner will take care of the petitioner and he will produce the petitioner in the Court if and when required. In case of absence on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled. (iii) The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or in any other 4 offence. (iv) In case of violation of the terms and conditions of bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the learned Juvenile Justice Board and he will be liable to be taken into custody. In the result, this revision application is allowed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)