IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17187 of 2010 1. ANIL YADAV 2. Fulena Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 148, 149, 376, 511, 324 and 307 of the Penal Code is that they are simply stated to be the member of the mob which came after the alleged assault by co-accused Pramod Kumar Yadav and Ujagar Yadav. There is no overt act whatsoever attributed to the petitioners even at the latter stage when the burning oil is alleged to have been thrown distinguishing them from the case of co-accused Suresh Yadav, granted regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 11666 of 2010. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 88/2009, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)