Xl-HC—78 3^£Tr^l^l^, ^Ttl^^KS, is|01-y^< •w^ir -^Tra? ...^.,^..^;,.......($-..^.............^ 200^, an^?r ^w ((i^l^<^) @ 3TT^r?FT'f^W 'cT^T 37T^T 5FRW '^iTW^ftn ^T^T MISC. APPBAL (CCLAIMi N0. 63212007 APPBLLANTS RBSPONDENT8 AU tfae Nayapa r/o Tahsil Ra^iganj 1. Moha|a s/o Chaji P.S. Rajasth^ Aliirwoii Durg. (q. (Driv{ Hai-b4B.sh 2. Goodwill ^FlfeFih 'RTR^f ^fe^ <fil<^l< ^T 3?RFT W^T 1. Sinl}. Krishna Bai, aged 35 years, w/c| late Kaliram Dewajigaon, 2. Vija^' Dewaiigaon, aged 18 yeai's, s/o latejKalii'am Dewaagaa, 3. Ku. | Savita Dewangaon, aged 15 yeai|s, Miaor, d/o late KaJiram De^angaii, 4, Ku.l Keeta Dev^aiigaon, aged 15 yeaijs, Min.or, d/o late Kaliram De^aiigaon, 5, Kzi, j Pushpa Dewaiigaou, aged 15 yeaijs, Mnior d/o late' Kaliram De^aiigaon (AppeU4iits 3 to 5 beiag mmors ai'e. represe^ited through their iiioflier i.e,, appeUa}it no, 1) [above are r/o viUage Tila, P.S. :a, Distt. Raipiir (C.G) at Present ^gea Ghodaii P.S. Maliasaiiiund, ^ Distt. Mahasamimd (C.G) Versus Lal Dhakad, aged 42 yem's, ijfcurbhuj Dhakad, r/o Burkhedi, Maadi, Distt. Kota, ^a, at preseut r/o vUlage '^., P.S. Naadiai Bhilai Distt. 4G), ^r ofTmck No.C.G.07/C/4267) Sefhi, s/o notknowu, r/o & Conceut Compaiiy, 15 3^5T -^1^10^, ^Tf1^4|(S, Is|(?l>l^^< HWv[[ sbNlcb """""-"" """""^•^•^••••••-"-•••^200~) W^[ -qir^ (^df^^r) ^Tr^r^ ^icf, ^T^TT^T $b^Jch Durg (C.' (Own< 3. Tb united India Insurance Ltd., tlirougli the ?jisioual Office, Branch Office at Raoad, Raipar, Distt. Raipur ^) Coiapaiiy ofTruck lr.07/C/4267) Coipipaiiy Dw Jai|l (C.< Insur^liice No.C.< DIVISIO: HON'BLE SHR5 HOrBLE SHRI8U: OR^U (23.0it7.200f7) ShriJ,A. Lohaiii coaiiselft Leaiiied Counsel fbr fhe wmit to effect fhe seivice on resi been passed agaiast responde^ liiially disposed of at the inotion| On tlie direction of Advocate, takes notice 011 Insurance Conipaay. Sio.ee a short question is] up for fiiial heaiiag. Hear'd. The appellaiits have pref^ of tlie Motor Vehicles Act bei|ti tlji; beh£JIi:: CM^?<rt<ii'l 'RTPf^lf ^* ^S[ Tf^I^R '^'sff^FTa^T &^-L? ^T D- :|r ofTmck No.CG.07/C/4267) BEN'CH -: ..C.BHADOO,J,&. IL KUMAR SINHA, J. ?r tlie appellaiits, ppellaiits submits tliat he does not ^ondents no. 1 & 2 as the clami has it no.3, flierefore, tliis appeal be stage. is Court, Shri Paiikaj Agrawal, tf of Respndent uo.3 Uriited India iiivolved iii fhis appeal, it is taken Ted fiiis appeal under section 173 ig aggrieved by tlie award dated GRPRJ—FS -50,000. 1 3:5^T ^iww^, ?$T{i'y4i<s, (c|<^i^^< H^-c Mo. 63>^ *ll*1dl ,j,^|4,--••--'-•-••••-••-..••••—........^ 200 ^ 3^i?r ^ra? (ijcif^^) ^r^r^ R^ioh '^8IT3?n^T ^qNr '^iTW^n^n^T -3- Accide^it towailds 18.1.2007 passed by the in Claim Case No.41/2006 when flie aiinual dependency of tlie a] aiid by applyio.g tlie niultipU.er conipensation aiid ni addition tc expenses aiid Rs. 2000/- been graated. Tlius a total awaixled to flie appeUaiits. Leaiiied counsel for tlie a^ death, tlie deceased naoiely appellaiit no. 1 aiid fafher of rest about 40 years, tiierefore, the| applied the inultipMer of 16 as fact, tlie leaiiied tiibunal has Hence, th.e compensation inaj multiplier of 16, On tlie otlier haad, Mr. aiid argued tliat tlie leanied Tril} lobknig to tiie facts aiid cii'c| awairled ajust aiid reasonable c|< Haviiig heai'd leanied c| perused tlie records. Admittedly, as per para 4 deceased Kalii'aoi Dewmigaii wa^ postmortem. repoit, 40 yeai's ha| also held it to be 40 yeai's, tli^ aifciount cni^^1Tl 'RFT^T ^ fe^t <f^^|< ^'stRm ^STT^T Claims Tribunal Mahasamuud, :by tiie leained Tribunal assessiiig 'pellaats to Uie tune ofs.44,000/- of 10, granted RS.4,40,000/- as tliis, Rs. 2000/- towaj-ds funeral loss of consortiimi have also of Rs.4,44,000/-has been pellaiits argued tliat at tlie tinie of Kalii'am Dewaagaa, husbaiid of |offlie appeUaiits hereiu, was aged leained Tribunal ought to have Iper fhe 2nd schedule, whereas ia idopted a wrong multiplier of 10. be iacreased by applyiiig tiie Fjaiikaj Agrawal opposes tlie appeal iinal has appUed correct niultiplier imstaiices of tlie case aad lias 32iipensation to the appellaiits, >unsel for flie parties, we have >f tlie clami petitioii, tlie age of tiie mentioiiecl as 37 years aad in. the been written aiid tlie tiibiuial has ^refore, admittedly, tlie age of^Ss^: zk. GRPRJ— 7—50,000., 3-^r ^1<41<?'»^, ^Tfl<-141<S, fsi^l'lrl^i _^^-^-c- (^O. ^l^ ^INdl *^|cb """"""""•""""••—••••••••••-•—"—-^ 3?r^T 'qira? (4c(f^®ii<sr) 3TT^r,oFT'f^TW '<fS}T^T^r $h^|ch •-} |NNNNN||^ f^ ^nw^fer'sn^r ^- |Kaliraiii Dewmigaii was 40 yeai's |tlie age ofthe deceased is 35-40 to be applied. Accordiiigly, we tlie decision of tiie Tribiuial by coiTect mid not legally sustsiiial to the age pf 40 yeai's, ouglit to Thereforc, by applyiag the dependency of 44.000/-, tlie tota| Accorduigly, tlie appeal is| set aside. Respoudeut no.3 is d| Rs.7,04,000/-. The above amoi^ tlie date of filuig of tlie claim pej Clamis Tribunal, The order olf fraction, as dii'ected by fhe tij: aiiiount. No costs. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge cr)i<if<n<I1ti 'W^ff "^ fe^ iFsi^K ^^tRFr-sTT^r ^B.d as per tlie second scliedule, tt' jyears, tlien tlie miiltiplier of 16 is ^re of tlie considered opiiiioii tliat |3plyin.g tlie multipUer of 10 is not |le. The leanied Tribunal lookiag jhave applied tlie multipMer of 16, i4ultiplier of 16 to fhe aiinual award comes to Rs.7,04,000/- . allowed. Tlie awaid raipugned is rected to pay tlie compensation of nt shall caiTy mterest. @ 6% from tition as Iias been awarded by tlie tlie apportioiimeiit ia flie same ibunal, shatl be appUed to tliis Sd/- sl"alKumarSinh. Judge GRPRJ— FS/246—2/2007— 50,000."'