IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2741 of 2010 1. Laxman Singh, son of Sri Nishan Singh 2. Bharat Singh, son of Sri Nishan Singh 3. Bhuval Singh, son of Sri Nishan Singh Versus The State of Bihar ---------------- 2. 07.04.2010 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Brahmpur (Chakia O.P.) P.S.Case No.232of 2009 registered under Sections 147, 447, 341, 323, 379, 435 of the I.P.C. and under Section 27 Arms Act It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that all the offences except offence under Sections 379 I.P.C. and 27 Arms Act are bailable. He further submits that a title suit and some criminal litigation are pending between the parties from before and for that reason, they have been falsely implicated in the present case. According to him, there is no specific allegation that these petitioners used firearms and that allegation is general and omnibus. Admittedly, nobody has sustained injuries. 2 Be that at it may, in the circumstances, let the petitioners abovenamed, in the even of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Buxar in connection with Brahmpur (Chakia O.P.) P.S.Case No.232of 2009 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)