:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NO. 674 OF 2007 NO. 674 OF 2007 NO. 674 OF 2007 IN IN IN EXECUTION EXECUTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 279 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 279 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 279 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION NO. 7 OF NO. 7 OF NO. 7 OF 2003 2003 2003 Tata Motors Ltd. ... Claimants. V/s. Sudhakar Dhondu Shirsekar & Anr. ... Respondents. None for the Claimants. Mr. C.V. Lad for the Respondents. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 15TH 15TH 15TH JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . This Notice is pending in this Court for a considerable time. It appeared on 19th June 2007 and thereafter, on 27th November 2007 when none was present. It appeared on 29th November 2007, when it was adjourned for one week. Subsequently, it appeared on 6th December 2007 when the Claimants and their Advocates were present and in their presence, it was adjourned to 17th December 2007. Thereafter, it appeared on 17th March 2008 and was adjourned for one week. 2. It is stated that Respondent No.1 has filed an affidavit in reply to the Notice. His Advocate is also :2: present today. The Decree Holder has filed affidavit in rejoinder on 28th March 2008. 3. However, when this Notice was called out, neither their Advocate nor the Claimants/Decree Holders are present. The Notice is dated 25th April 2007 and it is clear that it is repeatedly appearing on Board. 4. In these circumstances, the Notice is discharged and dismissed as such. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)