IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15728 of 2007 Between: P. Ravindra Reddy … Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool district & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri T. Rajanikanth Reddy for Sri K. Suresh Reddy Counsel for respondents 1-3: AGP for Home The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15728 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 as illegal and arbitrary. In his affidavit, the petitioner stated that there is a dispute over vacant site admeasuring Ac.0.39½ cents in Sy.No.497-A of Ragavendra Nagar, Kurnool between him and respondent No.4 in which a bread manufacturing factory was constructed in the name of S.V. Foods, that respondent No.4, who is the petitioner’s brother-in- law, filed O.S.No.14 of 2005 on the file of Family Court, Kurnool, which was disposed of by the Civil Court, against which respondent No.4 filed A.S.Nos.336 and 432 of 2006 in this Court and that the said appeals are pending. It is further stated that in the said appeals, this Court granted order directing the petitioner not to alienate the property, pending the appeals. The petitioner further averred that at the instance of respondent No.4, respondent Nos.2 and 3 have been threatening and harassing him by insisting to part with the possession of the property in favour of respondent No.4 or payment of Rs.30 lakhs to settle the dispute with respondent No.4. It is further stated that despite pendency of the civil dispute, respondent No.3 registered two false cases, namely, Crime Nos.38 and 142 of 2007 to harass the petitioner and in the guise of pendency of these criminal cases, respondent Nos.2 and 3 have been interfering in the civil disputes and harassing the petitioner. No counter affidavits are filed on behalf of the respondents. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that except registering the criminal cases and conducting investigation into the same, the police have not been interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.4. This submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader is placed on record and the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.19940 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 25.06.2010. ES