IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14979 of 2009 MOSTT.LAKHIYA DEVI @ LAKHI DEV W/O LATE CHHOTAN PRASAD SINGH, R/O OF MOHALLA-BADHAI TOLA, P.O & P.S.-MASOURHI, DISTT- PATNA------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE CHIEF MAANGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA,PATNA 2. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, BRANCH MASAURHI DISTT- PATNA---------------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 19.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State Bank of India that the money due stands credited in the account of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on verification, submits and certifies the position. He however has yet another prayer to make. His contention is that the respondent Bank has deliberately taken this money away from the petitioner despite she being the nominee and legal heir to claim the money in question. If the petitioner seriously thinks and feels that it is a case of deficiency of service then she has other remedy under special law to claim compensation on due evidence which may be laid by her in this regard. So far the present writ application is concerned, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)