IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN WRIT PETITION No.33478 of 2010 Between: S.Thimmappa. … Petitioner And The District Collector, Kurnool and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Gangisetty Rajeswara Rao. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside order dated 21-12-2010 of respondent No.3, whereby he has suspended the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies and having regard to the nature of the allegations contained in the impugned order, I am of the opinion that no relief, at this stage, can be granted as the petitioner’s authorization has been suspended as an interim measure, pending enquiry into the serious allegations made against him concerning running of the fair price shop. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, requested that respondent No.3 may be directed to complete the enquiry at an early date. Having regard to this request, the Wirt Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to complete the enquiry and pass a final order after giving opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.42454 of 2010 is disposed of as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:30-12-2010 Note: Issue CC in three days. (BO) MNR