IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 991 OF 2005 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 3174 OF 2005 GOA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ....Applicant CORPORATION, PANAJI GOA. Versus COMMUNIDADE OF VERNA AND ANR., ....Respondents Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Shreya S. Naik, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. L. Dharwadkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 27th February, 2006 P.C. Heard. Considering the facts disclosed in the application, sufficient cause having been shown for the delay of 17 days in preferring the appeal, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of the prayer clause 6(A). Application stands disposed of accordingly. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.