IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2382 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.633/2007 of ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS, FAST TRACK (AD HOC II, KOZHIKODE CC.185/2006 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, PERAMBRA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P.BALAKRISHNAN, S/O.CHOYIKUTTY, POYIL HOUSE, UNNIKULEM AMSOM DESOM, EKARAOOL,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/STATE&COMPLAINANT. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. P.RAJAN, S/O.RARICHAN, KARINTHORAMMAL HOUSE, UNNIKULEM AMSOM DESOM, EKARAOOL, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.SMITHA FOR R2 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P. No.2382 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008 ORDER The accused in C.C.No.185 of 2006 on the file of the J.F.C.M, -II, Perambra for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 7166 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj