1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5526 /2010 ( Union of India and another vs. Rajnish Kumar B N Shrivastava) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 15th March, 2011. Heard Mr. S. B. Bangde, learned standing counsel for petitioners. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 18.7.2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal whereby the Original Application filed by the respondent for expunging the adverse remarks came to be allowed. Considered the contentions canvassed by the counsel for the petitioners. The entry in the confidential report reads thus: “You need to take extra efforts to deliver results.” It is submitted that these remarks can not be termed as adverse remarks and, therefore, the Tribunal was wrong in treating these as adverse remarks and, therefore, direction issued by the Tribunal to expunge the same is unsustainable in law. 2 We have perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that it was not in dispute that the respondent was not served with any advisory note. It is further mentioned in the order that even for the verbal advice, a noting is to be maintained as stated in Para 3.1. It is further observed in the order that the respondents have not given any heed to the very important instructions issued by the Ministry and have recorded the adverse remarks and maintained the same by rejecting the respondent's representation without any basis. In the circumstances, the observations made by the Tribunal, in our view, are just and proper and needs no interference. Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE sahare