1 WP.9258-2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9258 OF 2010 Jyoti Sarmukadam .. Petitioner. Vs. Minister Co-operation, Dept. of Co-operation, Marketing & Textiles & Ors. Respondents. ---- Ms. Jane Cox, for the Petitioner Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 5. Mrs. V.R. Rege, for Respondent No.4. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. DECEMBER 07, 2010. P.C. 1] We have heard Ms. Cox, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Thakur, the learned AGP for respondent nos.1,2, 3 and 5 and Mrs. Rege for respondent no.4.. 2] We have noted that the petitioner’s Revision Application filed against the order dated 13.02.2008 passed by respondent no.2 is pending before respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 has confirmed the order passed by respondent no.3 on 26.04.2007. 2 WP.9258-2010 3] Rather than considering the challenge to the impugned orders in this Petition, we deem it appropriate that the pending Revision Application is directed to be decided expeditiously and preferably within a fixed period. 4] Hence, we direct that the pending Revision Application before respondent no.1, filed by the petitioner against the order dated 13.04.2008 passed by respondent no.2, be heard and decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31st January, 2011. All contentions on merits are kept open. 5] The Writ Petition is disposed off in terms of the above directions. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)