IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2010 WITH APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2010. Bimal Ramgopal Agarwal ..... ..... ...Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..... ... Respondents. Ms.Prabha Badadare, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.M.K.Kocharekar i/by Rajeev Sawant & Associates for the respondent No.2. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 11th March, 2010. PC: The petitioner in criminal application No.22/10 and 23/10 is the respondent No.2 in criminal application No.21/10. In the present case the respondent No.2 who is applicant in criminal application No.21/10 has filed complaint against the present applicant. In criminal application No.23/10 employee of the applicant No.1 has filed complaint against the applicant. 2. These are cross complaints filed by respondent No.2 against the applicant as counter blast to the complaints filed by the present applicant against applicants in criminal application No.21/10. 3. Since the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and for the reasons recorded while making rule absolute in Application No.21/10 the present applications are also allowed. Rule is therefore made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) in both the applications. 11.3.2010.