IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2972 of 2007 RAM CHALITAR RAM, SON OF LATE SUKHARI RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BATAWAN, P.S. JAMHORE, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, MAGADH ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, GAYA. 4. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, GAYA. 5. ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, AURANGABAD. ----------- 4. 29.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the amount on account of leave encashment and gratuity still remains to be paid. Learned counsel for the Board submits that the amount for the aforesaid amount has been sanctioned and the same shall be paid at the earliest, if not already paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is also entitled to the interest on account of delayed payment. In view of the submissions of the parties, the writ application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to represent for any remaining grievances, including interest, before an appropriate authority of the Board. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within four months on receipt of such 2 representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)