(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 10369 OF 2010 Laldas s/o. Manohardas Zaveri. .. Petitioner. versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, and 3 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. A.M. Phule, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. A.M. Karad, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 to 4. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2010 (2) COURT'S ORDER (Per R.M. Borde, J.) : 1. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 to 4 / Municipal Corporation states, on instructions, that the Corporation has taken a decision to invite fresh tenders. He further states that the Corporation has also taken a decision, not to act upon the tender notice published earlier. 2. In this view of the matter, grievance raised by the petitioner, in the petition, does not survive. The petition, therefore, stands disposed of. ( R.M. BORDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp10369