IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 21126 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.9.2011 Anil .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for Mr. Shakun Chaudhary, Advocate the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion on 15.7.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sold the land in question on 12.11.2010 and thereafter the same very land was sold by the subsequent buyer to a third person. The petitioner as well as the complainant were co-sharer in a big chunk of land. After the petitioner had already sold the land, there was no question of his going to the spot or trespassing the house of the complainant for any dispute pertaining to the land.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI- Randhir Singh, submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the aforesaid fact, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 15.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 19.9.2011 mk