// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In 1. S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.2455/2009 {Omprakash Vs. The State of Rajasthan} AND 2. S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.2473/2009 {Munni Devi Vs. The State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 30th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Pankaj Sharma, Counsel for petitioners in both the applications Shri Ashok Prajapat, PP for the State #### By the Court: Both the petitions arise out of same F.I.R., therefore, they were heard and being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material/case- diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. The case-diary was summoned in the present case and, on that basis, the learned Public Prosecutor contended that, after investigation of the case, the Investigating Officer has recorded a finding that prima-facie no case has // 2 // been made out against both the petitioners, namely, Omprakash and Munni Devi and file was sent to the Superintendent of Police for according sanction to file charge-sheet against the husband Pramod Kumar only. In view of the above statement of learned Public Prosecutor, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these bail applications with liberty to file fresh one in case necessity so arises. The bail applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that in case the Investigating Officer wants to arrest the petitioners then they will be given notice of two weeks at-least before doing so. A copy of this order may be placed in connected file also. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//