1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4555 of 2010. Shailendra Ramraji Srivas ..vs.. Ambadas Hemraj Lanjewar Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.K.R.Trivedi Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.P.A.Markandewar Adv. for the resp. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 6th DECEMBER, 2010. Heard Advocate Mr.Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Adv. Mr.Markandewar, learned counsel for the respondent. By impugned order dated 26/7/2010, 1st Additional Small Causes Court, Nagpur has refused to review earlier orders rejecting the application for petitioner/tenant for calling additional witnesses. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that alleged criminal dispute between the parties has no bearing on the suit as filed seeking eviction of the petitioner on account of bona fide need i.e. under Clause 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. With liberty to the petitioner to challenge impugned orders, after suit is finally decided, before appropriate forum; the present 2 writ petition is disposed of. Amount of Rs.4000/- deposited by the petitioner with the Registry of this court is allowed to be withdrawn by him. JUDGE chute