Crl.Misc No M- 36879 of 2010 Suresh Kumar and others v. State of Punjab Present: Mr.G.S.Lalli, Advocate, for the petitioners. *** Crl.Misc.No. 65511 of 2010 Crl.Misc.is allowed as prayed for. Crl.Misc.No. M-36879 of 2010 The present petition for grant of anticipatory bail has been moved on behalf of petitioners Suresh Kumar, Lakhvir Singh and Dhanwant Singh in case FIR No.59 dated 19.11.2010 under Sections 408/420/201/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sandour, District Sangrur. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations in the FIR are totally baseless and can be proved only on the basis of evidence. The allegations pertained to the period 2008- 2009. Learned counsel further submits that there is no shortage of the goods and no custodial interrogation is required. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have also gone through the contents of the FIR and other documents on the file. As per allegations in the FIR, the petitioners in connivance with each other sold 12 vehicles loaded with paddy/rice to the tune of Rs.45/50 lacs and heavy loss has been caused to the complainant. All account books were also in the custody of the petitioners and recovery of account-books is yet to be effected. The argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations mentioned in the FIR are matter of evidence and there is no evidence which goes against the petitioners that they have sold huge quantity Crl.Misc No M- 36879 of 2010 [2] of paddy/rice and at this stage they cannot be implicated in the case has no force. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to point out any thing with regard to not involving the present petitioners and by simply saying that all allegations are matter of evidence is no ground to grant anticipatory bail at this stage when specific allegations are there with regard to selling of 12 vehicles loaded with paddy/rice to the tune of Rs.45/50 lacs. In such like case, the concession of anticipatory bail cannot be granted. No ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The petition being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) December 16, 2010 JUDGE raghav