THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO :8071 of 2006 Dated: 28.4.2006 Between: Parvatam Rami Reddy, S/o late Gurava Reddy. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Station House Officer, Guntur Rural Police Station, Guntur and others. .....RESPONDENTs THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO :8071 of 2006 ORDER: (Per the Honourable Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari) This is a taken up case on the Fax Message dated 12.4.2006 sent by the petitioner seeking a direction, in the nature of writ of Madamus to call for the records and remarks from the respondents as to their visit to the house of the petitioner insisting for the whereabouts of his brother’s son at the instance of the 3rd respondent. The 1st respondent filed the counter-affidavit denying the allegations in the Fax Message. It is contended in the counter-affidavit that one P. Prasada Reddy, is an accused in Sessions Case No.187 of 2002 on the file of the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur and the learned Sessions Judge issued non-bailable warrant against him. It is further contended that since the petitioner is the paternal uncle of the accused, the respondents visited the house of the petitioner so as to ascertain the information about the whereabouts of the accused. It is submitted across the Bar by the learned Government Pleader for Home that in pursuance of the non-bailble warrants issued against the said Prasada Reddy, who is no other than the brother’s son of the petitioner, the respondents visited the house of the petitioner and therefore, the question of alleged harassment does not arise. In view of the submission made by the learned G.P. for home and in view of the averments made in the counter-affidavit, We are of the view that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. (T.MEENAKUMARI, J) 28th April, 2006 (K.C.BHANU, J) GURC