IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15378 of 2009 -------------------------- PETITIONERS: 1. PADMAJAN P.K., S/O. PADMANABHAN PILLAI, FLT NO. 3, CHAKKALAMANIL, PERUNTHANNI, VALLAKKADAVU (P.O.) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KANNAN K., S/O. KRISHNAKUMAR, SREEVILAS, MUTTATHARA, VALLAKKADAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR SRI.G.BIJU RESPONDENTS: 1. PURUSHOTHAMAN G., UDAYA BHAVAN, NAGARUPOZHI, PARAKKONAM P.O., VENJARAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRASADKUMAR G. @ KOCHUMON, DIRECTOR, SUKESINI CONSTRUCTIONS, VARKALA, KADAYIL VEEDU, KIDAVATHUVILA, PALACHIRA (P.O.), VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SHIBU, MANAGER, SUKESINI CONSTRUCTIONS, VARKALA, KADAYIL VEEDU, KIDAVATHUVILA, PALACHIRA P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THUMBA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY. WP(C) 15378/2009 2 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY. 6. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY. ADDITIONAL 7TH RESPSONDENT THE DIRECTOR, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, INLAND NAVIGATION DIRECTORATE, KALLADA HOUSE, ASRAMAM (P.O.), KOLLAM. (ADDITIONAL 7TH RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER ON I.A. NO. 6777/2009 DATED 10.6.2009.) ADV. SRI.C.V.BIMAL ROY FOR R2 & R3 SRI.C.A.CHACKO FOR R3 & R4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 15378/2009 3 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 26.5.2009 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONERS TO THE FOURTH RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT-P1 COMPLAINT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KNC/- P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 15378 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioners are not contractors who has been awarded with any work. The allegation that the work in Reach No.2 are restricted by Respondents 1 and 2 who are contractors of Reach No.3 is not a matter to be opposed at the instance of the petitioners. At any rate, this is a work awarded by the Additional 7th respondent - the Director, Irrigation Department, Inland Navigation Directorate, Kallada House, Asramam, Kollam. Hence if there is any dispute between the parties, it is open to the petitioners to file a petition before the Additional 7th respondent who has awarded the work and he will find a suitable solution of the dispute. The parties shall abide by the direction so issued by the Additional 7th respondent. The writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. knc/-