Civil Revision No.191 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.191 of 2009 Date of Decision:16.03.2009 Mukesh Kumar ....petitioner Versus Sumit Kumar & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Sherry K.Singla,Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Subhash Goyal, Advocate for the respondents **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. This is claimant's revision petition challenging the order dated 08.01.2009 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar, whereby his evidence has been closed by order. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that there was no fault on the part of the petitioner as he had also submitted the summons form, though they were filed late, however, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer on account of the negligence on the part of his counsel. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.3 has supported the impugned order and has argued that sufficient opportunity was given to the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate that one more opportunity be granted to the petitioner to complete his evidence subject to payment of costs of Rs.2000/-. It is made clear that no further opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner for leading his evidence and it will be his own responsibility to bring the entire Civil Revision No.191 of 2009 2 evidence. Let the parties appear before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar, on 15.04.2009. On that date, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar, will fix the date allowing the petitioner one opportunity to lead his evidence and on the date so fixed, the petitioner shall be responsible to complete his evidence. Civil Revision disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 16.03.2009 neenu