IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 20382 of 2008 Between: Mirza Mukaram Ali Baig, S/o. Late Mirza Bahram Ali Baig, R/o. H.No.10-3-14/C, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretriat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2.The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdi-Ka-Pool, Hyderabad. 3.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ghatkesar, R.R.District. 4.The Circle Inspector of Police, Nacharam, Ranga Reddy District. 5.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Uppal Police Station, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District. 6.Ranga Venkatesh, S/o. Late Ranga Rangaiah, R/o Chengicherla Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 7.Ranga Amarender, S/o. Late Ranga Rangaiah, R/o Chengicherla Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 8.Ranga Rajaram, S/o. Late Muthaiah, R/o Chengicherla Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 9.Pasula Mallaiah, S/o. Late P.Sayanna, R/o Chengicherla Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or orders and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the acts, deeds and things of the respondents 1 to 5 for not considering the representation dated 01-04-2008 for taking action for the fraud committed by the respondents 6 to 9 are illegal, arbitrary, against to the principles of natural justice, abusive of process of law and much against to the legal and fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondents to register a criminal case against 6th to 9th respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BANDARIRAMESH Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE , GP FOR HOME. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.20382 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition in order to prosecute the alternative remedies available to him under law. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner as sought for. No order as to costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 18.09.2008 v v