IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3799 of 2002 ANUJ KISHORE PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 02.05.2008 Heard. This application pertains to one relief i.e. grant of earned leave from 07.01.1999 to 31.03.1999 and then extension leave from 01.04.1999 to 18.06.2000 as well as for payment of due salary for the aforesaid period from 07.01.1999 to 18.06.2000. From paragraph 13 of the counter affidavit it is clear that in the leave records of the petitioner no such leave is admissible or due also which can be sanctioned and paid. Learned counsel for the State has relied on the earlier order of this Court dated 21.09.2000 in C.W.J.C N0. 1085 of 1999 to submit that the claim of the petitioner subsisting on that date came to be adjudicated upon by this Court by holding that the petitioner was not entitled for any earned leave and that this Court had also held that the petitioner was trying to lay false claim. Thus, there is no question of issuing a direction for grant or sanction of leave. In that view of the matter this application has no merit, and is accordingly dismissed. Vikash/- (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)