IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1794 of 2007 CHINTAMANI LAL DAS (aged about 57 years), son of late Janardhan Lal Das, resident of village Satahara Muzaffarganj, P.S.Rajnagar,Dist. Madhubani---petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Rahul Singh, the District Collector, Madhubani P.S. Madhubani, District Madhubani 3.Veena Prasad, Circle Officer, Rajnagar, P.S.Madhubani District Madhubani------------------------opp.parties ----------- 4. 21.1.2010 The direction in the interim order under contempt was not to forcibly dispossess the petitioner from the lands in question if he has not already been dispossessed. In the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties it is stated that the petitioner has not been dispossessed from the lands in question and the allegation of the petitioner regarding issuance of purcha is not correct since the same has not been issued with respect to the lands of the land owner from whom the petitioner had purchased the lands but with respect to the lands of her brother. In the above circumstances, no case for proceeding under the contempt jurisdiction is made out. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal