IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16378 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 13, 2010. Nachhattar Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are the existing depot holders in the State of Punjab who are aggrieved by the Government Policy dated 3.12.2009 (Annexure P-1) which intends to provide more avenues for different types of public services. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered view that the impugned Policy (Annexure P-1) does not suffer from any illegality. It being a matter of policy, which exclusively falls within the domain of the Executive though always subject to judicial review, no interference by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction is called for. C.W.P.No .16378 of 2010 2 Faced with it, learned counsel for the petitioners urges that they have served the respondents with a legal notice dated 3.8.2010 (Annexure P-3) pointing out their view points, but no action has been taken thereupon so far. As prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to pursue their afore-mentioned legal notice before the authorities concerned. Dasti. September 13, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE