IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3567 of 2010 Date of Decision : 16.8.2010 Smt.Shanti Devi ....Petitioner Versus Smt.Ramesh Gupta and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order as the petitioner who moved the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking to implead herself as a party defendant in the suit preferred by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 is already a party in a separate suit in which partition proceedings are going on inter se between the parties and the petitioner is one of the contesting parties thereto. Besides, the trial court has also observed that this appears to be a delaying tactic to thwart the process of the suit as after leading the evidence the instant application has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to effectively bring out the necessity of the petitioner being a necessary party in view of the afore stated facts. C.R.No.3567 of 2010 -2- No ground to interfere in revisional jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. 16.8.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss