THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.1983 of 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is directed against the order dated 31.03.2008 passed in I.A.No.455 of 2008 in O.S.No.20 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. Brief facts of the case are that the 1st respondent herein, Shamirpet Grampanchayat rep. by its Sarpanch, laid the suit O.S.No.20 of 2007 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Ranga Reddy District, against the respondents 2 and 3 herein, seeking perpetual injunction restraining them from interfering with the lawful possession and enjoyment of the general public, farmers and school children of Babaguda, Upperapally, Bommaraspet, Shamirpet and Aliabad villages, over the suit schedule property i.e. agricultural land bearing Sy.No.334, admeasuring 0.10 gts., situated at Babaguda Village, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioner herein, claiming to be the member of M.P.T.C. of Shameerpet Mandal, filed the present I.A.No.455 of 2008, seeking to implead him as plaintiff No.2 in the suit, contending that public interest is involved in the matter and that the plaintiff in the suit, having colluded with the defendants, is not evincing interest in pursuing the suit and, if the suit is withdrawn, the public interest involved at large will be defeated. The Court below, by the impugned order, closed the said petition, stating that the petitioner wanted to come on record as plaintiff No.2 in a suit for injunction simplicitor, which is not permissible, particularly when the main suit itself is dismissed as not pressed and, hence, no further orders are necessary. Aggrieved thereby, the present civil revision petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order and other material available on record. Admittedly, the suit is for injunction simplicitor. The plaintiff, who instituted the suit, has himself intended not to pursue the suit and sought for dismissal of the suit as not pressed. May be, the petitioner is interested in the subject-matter in public interest, but if the petitioner feels that non-pursuing of the suit by the person, who filed the suit, defeats public interest, then the remedy of the petitioner is to file separate suit, but he cannot seek his impleadment in a suit, which, admittedly, has been dismissed as not pressed. In that view of the matter, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 5th December, 2009 IBL