IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2010 / 1ST MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1349 of 2010(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ JOSE P.V, OCCUPANT OF ROOM NO.7, NEW BLOCK SHOPPING CENTRE, PATTURAICKEL, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- THRISSUR CORPORATION, REPD.BY IIS SECRETARY, CORPORATION BUILDING THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 1349 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 21st day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is against non implementation of the decision taken by the respondent requiring CITU to remove a flag post installed by them in front of a shopping complex, which remains unimplemented despite Ext.P3 notice issued by the Corporation in this behalf. 2. Standing counsel for the Corporation has been heard. 3. If as a matter of fact, the decision still remains in force and Ext.P3 notice has been issued by the Corporation, it is the responsibility of the Corporation to ensure that the same is implemented. 4. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent to ensure that its decision for the removal of the flag post, is implemented by taking appropriate action in the matter. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp