'S^ -MWW-'i, ®Ti1wi<c,Rlrtl'My. ^ r\-pt.<-. NO . |o^?- Nlt^di sb^leb -------------••--•••-•-^200 7 3ii^?r iraq; (4<sif-j«<i^) 3n^r?nR;-<i+. 'tTSH 331^1 ^qh? ^-. 'S^cIIW'Hfeiam^T BHSC.APPEAL APPELLANTS RESPONDBNTS D.B: HON'BLE) HON'BLfl L.C.Bhadoo. J, ^)T^'4)Ti *\m^ ^fj^^ <E^^< ^r sfligH g?^ (CLAIMl N0.1038/2007 Sure^h Khadya, s/o Gajan Khaidiya, aged| about 30 years, Occupation Labojurer, r/o viUage Lakha, TehsU & Dis4 Raigarh (C.G). yersus SiiTeshKuxnar, s/o Udal Ram Yadav, aypd about 24 years, Occupation Driver, r/o viSa^e Rudukela, P.S. Tamnar, Tehsil Ghai^hoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G), 2.| Kailash Savariya, s/o Nattulal, aged about 32 years, Occupation Owner, R/o Prachi Minerals JorahapaU, Tehsil & Distt. Ra^arh (C.G), N^tional Insurance Co.Ltd.,through Btaach Maa^er, B-l Taha coinplex, R|ng Road 1, Priyadarshini Nagar, B^laspur (C.G) SHM L.C. BHADOO, J, & SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SIMHA,_J. «RALORDER 8.09J2007) SIui Vineet Kumar Pa|idey, coiinscl for the appellanfc Heard on admission. The claimant has pre^i award dated 11.5.2007 pas^erfby :rred this appeal bcing aggrieved by the 4*h AddL Motor Accident Claims M B 'XI-HC—78 ^esf ^i^llci^, »T{lyis,fsitfii^y sn^v ^r R-fi'h ^TSTT 3TI^T'g^TlN? •M.,A.C.,-^O',IOM NINyll **11+ "m, 2007 an^?r IWK (1pf^5«T) 'Raiw:Hfl?f an^i !-• Tribunal (F.T.C), Ra^arh, of dependency to the ttme) awarded for funeral expen^ for loss of consordum and alongwifh interest @ 7 %% (ffhercby the tribunal has assed fhe loss of Rs.1,80,000/-, Rs.2000/- has been |es aad Rs.10,000/- has been awarded |ia aU Rs.1,92,000/- has been awarded {)er annuia, fioin the date offitmg of the claiiu petition tiU the date of Having heard counse} for the appeUaat, we have perused the impugried award. The deceased Jamuu^ as a labourer alongwith the| 13 has assessed the iacomt on the notional incoine aadl Rs.10,000/- peryear has b^ under the head of funerall nature of work wlucb thd Consalered opiaion that the is just aad reasoiiable and side. Therefore, this appeal •*I^I?l<i)-< lIFRTf '^.'fS^t tfat^K ^siRraaii^i iccoveiy. Devi, wife ofthe claimaut, was working claimant The leamed tribuiial in para ofthe deceased as Rs.15,000/- based after deducting 1/3 personal expenses, ;en assessed as loss of dependency. by adoptfng the inultrplier ^f 18, Rs. 1,80,000/- has been assesscd as loss ofiacome. In additi<|)n to this, Rs.2000/- has been awarded expenses aud Rs.10,000/- under thc head ofloss ofconsortiuiu. Having perused fhe injipugned award aad also consadenug fhe I deceased was doiag, we are of the lcoiiipensation awarded by the Tribtmal |in no way it can be said to be on lower |is wifhout luerite, the same is liable to be dismissed aad it is bereb|y dismissed at the motion staye itsetf. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge .Lfcs^'-