@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI3GARH AT' BILASPURN DIVISION BENCH Coram— : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. ”‘ Misc. Apgeal No.9zs of 2005‘ Gaindibai W/o Jaikishan Halba Aged 28 years 1. ~r~wwr:‘—~§-:»E. V, »A Memo of Aggeal UIS 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act I988, Present : None tor the appellants. Shri Q Aziz, counsel for respondent No.3 v ORDER (16“; June, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: u Harish S/o Jaikishan Halba,‘ aged about07 years ‘ 3. Hemant S/o Jaikishan Halba aged about 1O years, Minors through Natural guardian Gaindibai W!o Jaikishan Balba Au R/o Village cmklakta Ps Rajhara, Tah — Balod Distt Durg (CG) Ve(sus Respondents Non-applicants 1. Amarjit Singh S/o Gurubachan Singh Soni Age 28 years R/o Village _Samoda PS' Pulgaon at present Harnabandha, Durg Distt Durg (CG) Driver 2. Manager TOU Bus Service C/o M/s Taxi owners United Bus Service, Ganj Para Durg, Distt Durg Owner 3. National lnsurance Company Limited, Gill Complex, near Gurudwara, Station Road,>Durg w“‘Mw...,...,v.m. ,m 7 _ 7 None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalfof the appellants, we l are left with no other option, but, to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. issed for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dism 4) Consequently, MCP No.1 093/2005 also stands dismissed for want of prosecution. e- i i / f’ Sdl- p Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge i l l Sdl— padma GHIEF JUSTICE