IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.237 of 2009 Jagdish Mandal @ Jagdish Yadav & Ors Versus Umesh Yadav & Ors ---------------------------------- 7 28.09.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties is present and raises a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of this revision application on the ground that the impugned order is interlocutory in nature. By the impugned order the court below has allowed the prayer of the plaintiff for examination of plaintiff Umesh Yadav as a witness. As such, this order is interlocutory in nature. However, in view of the decision in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar reported in 2010(2) PLJR 1954, it is appropriate that an opportunity should be granted to the petitioners to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners are granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further 2 reference to the bench. roy ( V. Nath, J.)