IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14903 of 2009 1. SHYAM KUMAR 2. Ram Krishna Sah @ Vakil Sah @ Ram Krishna Prasad 3. Vijay Kumar @ Bulbul 4. Sakaldeo Prasad 5. Prem Prakash 6. Pawan Kumar @ P.P. 7. Ranjit Sah @ Ranjit Kumar ---Versus--- 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rahul Ranjan ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.3636 of 2009 1. NITU DEVI 2. Nirmala Devi 3. Mahendra Sah 4. Manju Devi 5. Rambha Devi 6. Bijay Shanker ---Versus--- 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rahul Ranjan ----------- 2/ 23.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are relations of the deceased from parental side. They have been alleged for killing the deceased which is controverted by the learned counsel on the ground that deceased was killed at in-laws house. Immediately, an F.I.R. was lodged, the matter investigated and charge-sheet was submitted but in trial, prosecution failed to substantiate the charges levelled against the accused of that case including the complainant. Taking benefit of the same only, this case has been lodged after lapse of near about two years that is also on the basis of complaint and petitioners are apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month 2 from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1093 of 2007 (T.R. No. 675 of 2007), above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)