IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42654 of 2010 1. RAM KUMAR SAH, S/O Upendra Prasad Sah, Resident of Village- Kanharia, P.S. Dagarua, Distt- Purnea. 2. Ranjit Sah, S/O Ram Kumar Sah, Resident of Village- Kanharia, P.S.-Dagarua, Distt- Purnea. -----------Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -----------Opposite party 2. 20.01.2011 Heard Shri N. K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Shri Yogendra Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner no. 1 being the elder brother of the husband of the deceased and petitioner no. 2, son of petitioner no. 1 have prayed for grant of bail in Biasi P.S. Case No. 121 of 2010 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the informant his daughter was married to the younger brother of petitioner no. 1 and within 7 years of marriage she was done to death by the accused persons and she was also criminated. In the complaint petition almost all the family members of husband of the deceased were made accused. As per the F.I.R. occurrence had taken place on 9.4.2010. The mother of the deceased filed a Complaint on 17.5.2010 in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea vide 2 Complaint Case No. 1561 of 2010 which was referred to police for its registration and investigation and accordingly on 16.6.2010 F.I.R. in the present case was lodged. Learned senior counsel while pressing the bail application submits that during investigation even witnesses have said that the informant side participated in cremation of deceased, which has been noticed by learned 2nd Additional sessions Judge, while rejecting the bail application of the petitioners. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposes the prayer for bail. In view of the fact which has been noticed by the learned Court below that witnesses have said that the informant participated in incrimination as well as the fact that for an occurrence which has taken place on 9.4.2010 at a much belated stage the complaint was filed, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for granting privilege of bail to both the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners namely, Ram Kumar Sah and Ranjit Sah be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) 3 each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Biasi P.S. Case No. 121 of 2010. Anand Kr. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)