IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19589 of 2007 Between: 1 Madduri Ratnaiah, s/o. Nagaiah, R/o. Narasinghi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Madduri Raghu, S/o. Nagaiah, R/o. Narasinghi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Madduri Jagan, S/o. Nagaiah, R/o. Narasinghi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Madduri Dasaratha, S/o. Nagaiah, R/o. Narasinghi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Regional Settlement Commissioner Ministry of Rehabilitation, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2 The Asst. Settlement Commissioner, Settlement Wing, (Processing) Jaisaheer House, New Delhi. 3 The Special Secretary & Commissioner of Land Administration, A.P., Hyderabad. 4 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 5 The Reenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Davison, Chevella, R.R. District. 6 The Deputy Collector-Thasildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice without passing any final order in letter dated 24-1-2002 pending before the collector, Ranga Reddy District and direct the respondents to fix the market value of the land in Sy.No. 290 for an extent of Ac.18-14 guntas situated at Poppalaguda Village as on the date of application of petitioner i.e. 22-2-1997 and collect the same as sale consideration and transfer the property in the names of petitioners as per rules and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners :MR.SALIKITY RAJU Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioners filed a letter dt.21.4.2009 seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to workout their remedies. Permission is granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioners to workout their remedies in accordance with law, if the cause of action subsists. No costs. ______________________ (L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 24.4.2009 bnr