IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 3568-CII of 2008 and CR No. 1014 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.9.2009 Jang Bahadur and others ....Petitioners. Versus Manjit Kaur ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Mehsampuri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for the respondent. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. C.M. No. 3568-CII of 2008 Allowed as prayed for. C.R. No. 1014 of 2008 In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 12.1.2006 (Annexure P-5) passed by the trial court whereby they have been directed to pay Rs.1000/- per month as maintenance to the respondent from the date of application. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the file, it cannot be said that the quantum of maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to the respondent from the date of application under Section 19 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 is C.R. No. 1014 of 2008 -2- excessive in any manner. No illegality or perversity could be found in the impugned order dated 12.1.2006 (Annexure P-5) which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. September 8, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE