THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.6630 of 2006 Dated: 04.04.2006 Between: Ch. Venkateswarlu, S/o Narayana, Working as P.A./Shunter in V Stage of K.T.P.S., Paloncha, Khammam District. .... PETITIONER AND The Chief Engineer (O & M), Kothalgudem Thermal Power Station, V Stage, A.P. Power Generation Corporation Limited, Paloncha, Khammam District and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.6630 of 2006 Order: Questioning the memo dated 12.04.2004 issued by respondent No.2 directing the petitioner to appear before the Senior Security Officer/KTPS-V on 12.04.2004 for oral enquiry and recording of statement with respect to the particulars/validity of IX Class Certificate furnished/produced by him at the time of employment, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. A perusal of the impugned order dated 12.04.2004 shows that the petitioner was only directed to appear before the Senior Security Officer/KTPS-V on 12.04.2004 for oral enquiry. It is surprising to note that questioning the said memo, which was issued on 12.04.2004, the petitioner filed the present writ petition in the year 2006 i.e., after lapse of two years. I am unable to understand how the petitioner can question the said order in the year 2006 about the direction given to him to appear before the Senior Security Officer on 12.04.2004. There is absolutely no material to substantiate why the petitioner is questioning the impugned order passed on 12.04.2004 at this point of time i.e., after lapse of two years, and that too against the order directing him to appear before the Senior Security Officer on 12.04.2004 for oral enquiry. In the circumstances, the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 04.04.2006 Nsr