IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6230/2010 Sher Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 21/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Ms. Madhu Meena for accused petitioner Mr. Amit Poonia,Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that in the present case the petitioner was arrested on 22.6.2010, on the allegation of commission of offence of theft of a motor cycle. The alleged stolen motor cycle has already been recovered. Investigation is almost complete. The Court below has rejected the b ail application of the petitioner only on the ground of pendency of two cases against him, out of which one case is for offence under Section 304-A IPC and another case is for offence under Section 392 IPC . According to the learned counsel, the petitioner would under-take not to indulge himself in commission of any such offence in future. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications. Considering the rival submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sher Singh S/O Shri Ram Bilas Meena shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 479/2010 of P.S. Kotwali, Dausa, District Dausa on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is again found indulging in similar or any other offence at any point of time in future, the bail granted to him by this court in the present case and in other cases, would be liable to be cancelled at the instance of the prosecution on this ground alone and stipulation to this effect shall be inserted in the bail bonds produced by the petitioner, and the sureties to be produced in support thereof shall be verified by the Tehsildar of the area concerned. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi