?-',» HIGH_CQUKT_OF C_HHATnSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 7328 of 2007 Petitioners 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Shyamal Kumar Bag, S/o Late Shri Dashrath Ksvg, aged about 40 years. PrafuU Narayaii Bishwas, S/o Late SJhri Makhan Lal Bishwas, aged about 70 years, Caste Huidu Kayasta, R/o. Basudev Saha, S/o Layte Shri Chitranjau Saha, aged about 35 years. Prosen Sarkar, S/o Late Shri Ghirendra Sarkar, svged about 48 years. Smt Prabhawati Bishwas, W/o Shri B. N. Bishwas, aged about 43 years. Ratikant Sikdar, S/o Late Shri Chaadrakaat Sikdar, a^,ed about 50 years. Sint. Saroj SIuivastava, W/o Late Shri B. P. Shrivastava, aged about 76 years. Krishna Namashudra, S/o Shri Narendra Namashudra, aged about 40 years. Harishchandra Khopraghade, S/o Shri Daulat Ram, aged atoout 34 years. AU R/o Lokmanya Tilak Waid No. 37, Dharampura No.2, Jagdalpur, District BastarC.G. State of Chliattisgarh, fhrough the Secretary, Department of Reveaue, Ministiy, D.K.S. Buildu^, Raipur(C.G.) The CoUector, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) The Conunissioner, Nagarpalik N%am. Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. The Telisildar, Jagdalpur, Distrit Bastar (C.G.) Laxmi Narayan Dubey, Editor & Publisher (Prataha ludia News) Nayamunda Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. (Writ Petition underArticle 226 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Respondents Versus 1. ^. 4. 5. .:''! Sbri Alok Dewangaa, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Arnritn Das, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. Shri Viaay Harit, Seiuor Advocate wifh Shri I. N. Shrivastava, Advocate for fbe respondeut No.3. Sbri Rajeev Sbrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No. 5. s"!-a*'a», >—-!^•vi ^ v s %»^s../ o O RD E R (orall ( Passed on fhis 27U1 day ofJuly, 2009) Heard. 1. Leamed counsel appeariug for fhe petitioners, on iastructions, subinits fh.at the petitioners have filed a civil suit, seekuig declaiation of the nature of fhe property ia dispute. In view of fhat, fhe petitioners seek pennission ofthis Court to withdraw fhis Petition. Leamed counsel further subruits that siace fhe order of status quo was grauted on 7.1.2008, fhe sauie inay be contuiued for a period oftwo weeks to take necessary steps for obtauung proper orders froin fhe Civil Court. 2. Havuig regard to fhe facts situation of the case, without expressing any opmion on nierits of the case, it is directed that fhe status quo, as obtauied on 7.1.2008, shaU. contuiue for a further period of 15 days froin today. 3. In view of the above, without expressiug any opiaion oa fhe nierits of fhe case, fhe petition is disnussed as withdrawn. No order asto costs. ———— Satish K. Agnihotri ThakuT JudgC ^-