IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9704 of 2008 Decided on: 8.12.2010. Rajesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy A.G. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The case of the petitioner is that though he has completed ten years continuous service with 240 days of each calendar year in the year 2000, however, he was regularized in the year 2002 i.e. after the period of 12 years. It is also evident from the mandays' chart placed on record, that the petitioner had been working continuously since 1990 and had competed 240 days in each calender year. The petitioner is seeking benefit of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 supp (2) SCC 316. 2. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work charge status immediately after the completion of requisite 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? period of service within a period of two months after the production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 8, 2010 ((bhupender)