HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.21803 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is ﬁled against interim order dated 17-09-2008 passed in O.A.No.583 of 2008 on the ﬁle of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad. 2. The petitioner ﬁled the above O.A. challenging his transfer to Meghahatuburu vide order dated 08-09-2008 on administrative grounds. The Tribunal, while granting time to oﬃcial respondents for ﬁling reply, passed the interim order, which reads as follows: “Mr. B.N.Sharma takes notice on behalf of the respondents and requested 3 weeks time for ﬁling reply. Post after 3 weeks. Status quo as on today shall be maintained. In the meantime, the applicant is at liberty to submit representation, if not already submitted, to the 1st respondent explaining his diﬃculties to comply with the order of the transfer in the middle of the year. On receipt of such representation, the 1st respondent shall consider the possibility of transferring him to a nearby place. This exercise shall be completed by the next date of hearing.” 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he was transferred to Meghahatuburu as a punitive measure as he was given relieving order as well as transfer order on the same day. It is seen from the record and impugned order that O.A. is still pending and the Tribunal in its discretion ordered status quo as on 17-09-2008 with regard to transfer order and given liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the ﬁrst respondent and on doing so, the ﬁrst respondent shall explore the possibility of transferring him to a nearby place. 4. The impugned order was passed on 17-09- 2008 as stated above and O.A. was adjourned by three weeks and in the meanwhile, the ﬁrst respondent was directed to take a decision on the representation. The time granted by the Tribunal has not expired as on today and it is to be noted that only two weeks have passed since the date of passing of the impugned order. Since there is no final conclusion reached by the Tribunal and prima facie, it appears there is no jurisdictional error, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition and express any opinion on the merits of the case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. 5. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances, we deem it appropriate to direct the Tribunal to dispose of O.A. within two weeks, after a decision is taken by the ﬁrst respondent on the representation submitted by the petitioner. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the orders to be passed by the ﬁrst respondent pursuant to his representation, it is always open to him to seek appropriate relief in the O.A. itself. It is needless to mention that the Tribunal shall consider O.A. on its own merits and decide the matter in accordance with law. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ________________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J. 30-09-2008 Note: Furnish copy in three days on usual terms. (b/o) bsc