... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.17 OF 2002 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.769 OF 2001 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.M. Shettigar for the Petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Counsel for the Petitioner fairly concedes that the Petitioner has expired long back, sometime in 2003. However, no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal represetatives of the deceased-Petitioner. Petition, therefore, stands abated. The counsel for the Petitioner points out that in terms of order dated 30th July, 2002, the Application was moved before the authority which has been decided in favour of the Appellant. As the matter has abated, it is not possible for me to consider the above aspect. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE