1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.92 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2652 OF 2005 M/s.Inno Vision, Division of Allied Engineers and Elastomers. ...Plaintiff. vs. M/s.Prompt Distributors, Proprietorship Concern of Mr.Gajraj Singh. ...Defendant. --- Mr.Sanjeev Kanchan i/b. Sanjeev Kanchan & co., for Plaintiff. Mr.G.Kothari with Ms.Mrudula Kadam i/b. Vima Dalal & Co. for Defendant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 26th June, 2006. P.C.:- 1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of price of the goods which, according to the plaintiff, were supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant. The defendant denies receipt of the goods. The plaintiff does not have any documentary proof presently to show that 2 the defendant has definitely received the goods. In this view of the matter therefore, obviously, the suit cannot be decreed in the summary jurisdiction. The summons for judgment is disposed of. The defendant is granted unconditional leave to defend the suit. Written statement to be filed within a period of Eight weeks from today. ---