c^> ttrlE IN^BiE HIGH OGUET OS jaiS.CBBKBE OS aiHrf"EISGABH SS' BII»ASPUB. W.P.NO., "i/GO y200 2. PEri'Etm UNDER SSSS.CL.B 226/_227__Q.E' ^THB 039 STI'I'U'l'2?(M_OE_raaA PECITXOsIEB. Bep Prasad Pafc&L, aged 39 years» eon of dient Rgn Patel, residai-t of •villlgge Paidadibafcha, 'E'eia. Mungeli, EtLstt.Biia^ur, Chhattisgarii. RE^gPCHEENTSt \,i'r ^c^ ^ o/ ^ <^-" •'v' : c-> ...rs * ....^' <£,;•'• VERSEJS. 1. Sfeafce of Chhabtisgscb, 'Biroue^i PrincipaL Sscretary, Health Services, Ei, K. Bh awai, aalpur, C> G. 2. EiLrecfcoE, Health Services, E^K.Bhawai, Raipur, Q. G.. 3. Chief Medical Officer. . Bila%>ur,G, GL Clvil Surgeon, '.^•'J.AW'-'"... Bil a^ur, G, Q. ^t'i''^8'"'....--""" -l«"Si»"" 5. Slods, Medical Offi6?a. Qstnmuni-ty Heal.th Caitre,Pabhariya, BL sfct. Bil a%>ur, €».,%' 36°...t-r'J^?-4^ -.>'"^^l"J'y w;^^]^^ 'vSS.'S P£a'ISm_®OER_^Kia»ES_226/227__Oi''IHECGKI 813:101103 Og mECA •eos. issuffiCE_or _WBIT os Hwoasjs/c^as.os.sfa. WDOS. PKCHIBZTICS OR ^BY Saai._WK['S/'OKDER,OR ISREGEIOHS IN 'IHE^SaiE NXTtJRE IN 1HE CT RGUMS'raiGES OF THE CASB. w: m XI-HC-22 T^.-'aiiicj^ffxil'y^is^Iwti'M^' ^.^.:.&.sio...SfcoJ'2^^ ^..^...........^...............^ ^ 311^^1 ] STT^I g^rwgfi^ !(-!!.- -; :!?"t':'' 7" ^-f- 3n^[ ^RST^R ^rftg <*i!^fe'4lTl '"TH^f ^ 'fe^ •^i-^.R ; q? srfigii an^i 07/11/2002 Shri G. C. Paadey, couiisel for the petitioner. Shri Rattbir Singh, GA for tihe State. Haviag heard leamed coijuisel, fhe Court is not iaclined to entertam tbis Writ Petition wt4ch has been filed on 13/02/2002 chaUeagiag petitioner's termmati(j>n which took place on 18/03/ 1986. It is stated by leamed (:ounsel for fhe petitioner that the petitioner had inoved several re^resentations before respondeut no.2, but fhese were not considered by| fhe Authorities. At that point of tiaie fhe State Adiniaistrative Tnbuiilal had been established aud if the representation or appeal had no^ been. disposed of, then if a period of six m.onfhs from. the date on w.bich such appeal/representation was inade, faas expired the petitionerjcould have approached the Tribiuial for relief. However, that was notjdone and now after lapse ofabout 15 years, petitioaer challenge®fhe unpugned order dated 18/03/ 1986. This cannot be pemiitted. Acco^diagly, this writ petition fails and is disinissed. ConsequentlyM.W.P.|No.63/2002 staads disposed of. Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge f-it^^aa