{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.31 OF 2010 Anna W Bhanudas Arjun Patil, Age-28 years, Occ-Agriculturist R/o Nandale, Tq & Dist-Dhule APPLICANT VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Pratibha Ravindra Patil, Age-30 years, Occ-Agriculturist R/o Nandale Tq & Dist-Dhule RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 5th February 2010 PER COURT: 1. By the present application the applicant, who has filed criminal revision application No.31/2010, has prayed to release him on bail pending the hearing and final disposal of the criminal revision application. {2} 2. The revision is preferred by the applicant challenging the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Criminal Appeal No.31/2009 whereby the learned Judge has confirmed the order dated 02.03.2009 passed in STC No.6667/2004 by 3rd joint JMFC, Dhule by which the applicant was convicted u/s 354 and 451 of the IPC. The applicant is taken in custody on 27.01.2010. It is informed that the fine amount is already deposited by the applicant in the trial court. It is urged that the applicant was on bail during the trial and during pendency of the criminal appeal. In the premise, the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail by the trial court, however by furnishing fresh surety and on executing fresh PR bond. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “A” and “B” and stands disposed of. The applicant to furnish the bail before the trial court. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln482-10 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.31 OF 2010 Anna W Bhanudas Arjun Patil, Age-28 years, Occ-Agriculturist R/o Nandale, Tq & Dist-Dhule APPLICANT VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Pratibha Ravindra Patil, Age-30 years, Occ-Agriculturist R/o Nandale Tq & Dist-Dhule RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 5th February 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to respondents. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Notice of respondent No.2, returnable on 19.03.2006. Within mean time call R & P. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln482-10