HIGH COURT OF CHHATTECARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) VO 1247 of 2008 : 1. Maya Ram Sahu S/o Shn Sadaram Sahu Age about 5 Headmt Mdl ch Chanan Bl t arl C cc a S/ Shn or Snha Ae t ‘ ar D i c ilha 3 Gulab Ram Sahu Sio Lte Sm Douva Ram Sh Age abt . a l au ou PET’ITIONERS yr st ce o oy a Sc l l Dh is a C , ang lahra So al abo ar e t l Bothapa Bloc ar amr CG g h o a Headma ldl cool oc ga l ta G Blk Nan Dstt Dhamn (C) . mc o h e il a l ga 1 C _ ah a a l , g e c e 8 Takeshwar Praead Verma S/o Shrl Jdsh Ram Vrma Age . agl e -‘ au a e oo l Bk a lst ha . a a vamll Lrr a R ml Ae u ea mste So ' Drgalnn lck Naaan Dtt amt(C) ' a, Bo ls Dhar1G 0 Ixj Ram Thakur S/o Shn Ganesh Ram Thakur, Age about - 1 eu , e c tr t u r t o l N tt. mt C). . at o hisar o ecrer r T ‘ t wa CG 2. rt lce t. i/r CG 3. Bl ar l c iril‘ ar (W PF T:I'IN ER ATICLE 226 OF THE COSTHIN OF ID) RIT IO UND R NITI'O NIA Present : hr Sk‘t Verma‘Adte for the pettloers t Sm ai Pane Layr f the Ste. ‘ Si omarx ,voca rn. Sm. ite Gh, l we or ta Pasd n 26a; of Fbrary; 208 (se o eu 0) T tiiors r ppu a At ae ixe a IO r leo rob rted u p sce he petue wee initially‘aoited s ssistan Techrs on fd py of Rs O/— Alte compnn of patron, the petltloners were gan reglar ay al 8 years aser lde Sool gao, ock Nagan D1st Dhamt (G) >2. lira Rm Smha o Udham i g abou 55 yes UT Mddle Shool Klmirzg Block Doundoar, D1$tt Durg (CG) 56 eas Ast Teahr Gvt Bs Primry hool Gokupur Bock amfan Dtt Dhamtn (G) 4 Ga Ram Dech / Shn Buxam Deshlahra Age ut 54 yes Had Maser Mddle School har, k Ngal Dlstt Dhtal () 5, Jagmohan Smh Velma S/o Slm Rjkhan Smg Veuna Age abut 54 yem ster Mde Sh Kotarwah1 6 Hhha Ram Smha S/ Shn Bagoh Ram Smha Age about :3 yars UDT Mdde School BJar Kurrdlh, Block ' Van Dstt Dhamtar1(G) ' 7. Mhes Kumr Dewangn S/o Late Shrl Mentam Ram Dewangan Ae about 50 yars UDT Mlddle Shool Kergaon, Block Nagam Dlstt Dhamtan (CG) l bot 49 yers UDT Govt Hr Sc Schl Gatta Sllr loc Ngar: Dt Damtrr (CG) 9 Bhrat Rm Agm S/o S lagnu am Agvansn g abot 52 yrs Headar uovt Pnmary chol 60 years Asstt Teaher Govt Pnmary Shool Bhohapag ‘ Block Nagan Drst Dhamtan (CG) ll Pardesln Ram Dhrv Sfo Shn RAmchandra Dhmv Age about 54 yeas Asst Teacher Govt Pmnary Schol Kumharpadm Bock agari, Dis Dhaari (G VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1 Ste f Chattgh, thrugh Stay Educaton & ubal Welfare Departmen, DKS Bhan, Ralpur () Dietic Education Offr, Dist DhamtarDug (). ock Educton ‘Ofcer ' Blok DhamtarfNaga Doundlloha (SB Hon'ble Mr Sahsh Agmhotrl J ) ORAL ORDER Similarly situated employees had approached the Madhya Pradesh State Adminiétrative Tribunal, Jabalgur. The Tribunal passed the order on 24.08.1992 in OA No. 2745/89, (Madhukant Yadh and 56 others Vs. State ofM.P. & Others.) It was further held that me sard beneft would be glven to all the teachers and they should not be compelled to mproach the Tnhunal for sumlar ‘r l benefit 1ndm1dually or colledlvely rBeing aggrieved r the then State of Madhya Pradesh had filed fhe Speéial Leave Petltlon (Crvrl) No 6 7/93 rmpugung the order dated 24.08.1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh Adnnmstratrve Trrbuna‘l, . I _ Jabalpur in 0A. No. 2745/89. The Hon'hle Supreme Court alter hearing 1 ‘ 9’ < counsel for the partiesl dismissed the Special Leave Fetition and having ‘_ regard to the large financial implications, gamed one year's time to settle the claim for the arrears without interest vide order dated ' _ V' 03 01 1994 It was further observed that the intervention would work ’ out thelr rights 1n accordance wrth law This order dated 24 08 1992 passed by the Tribunal in O A No 2745/1989 is applicable to the petitioners being Similarly Situated and they are accordingly entitled to the same beneft Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this Court / ’ while eonSidering the same issue Li Ram Kumar Qahu and others Vs State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another in Writ Petition (S) No. 813 of 2007 by order dated 12.02.2007, has granted regular pay scale wef. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this case is a squarely covered by the decision ofthi‘s Court in the case of Rain Kumar Sahu and others Vs State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another (Supra) I Ll However the state is at liberty to verify the facts of apponrtment asto” whether the case of the petitioners are srmilar to that of the order dated 12.02.2007 passed by this court in W.P. (S) No. 813 of2007 (Supra). I ’ ' _ . In view of that this petition is allowed in the same terms i.e. petitiimers are entitled to the same relief as was granted by the Madhya Pradesh , 7 ,- L . State Administrative Tribunal Jabalpur in OA No 2745/89 r F (Madhuhant Yadu and 56 others Vs State of MP & others) and ' subsequently confnned by order dated 03 01 94 nassed by the Hon’ble hw Supreme Court m Speclal Leave Pstmon (C1v1l) No 6892/93 The petitlonerg shall be governed bv the orders passed by fhe Tribunal as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court (supra) aecordmly No order asto costs. Satish K. Agnih¢tri g