CRLMB5008/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.5008/2010 Mukesh Vs. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 25.05.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Jagdish Singh Chauhan, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that the petitioner is accused of committing offence under Sections 457 and 380 IPC; the recovery has been made; there is no previous offence against the petitioner; investigation is almost on the verge of completion; the trial of the case is likely to take a long. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Mukesh Son of Dayaram on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.102/2010, Police Station Atru, District Baran, for offence under Sections 457 and 380 IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. However, in case petitioner is found CRLMB5008/2010 // 2 // indulged in repeating the similar offence at any point of time the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail before the court below itself. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//