CW 13838/09 { 1 } In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.13838/2009 Ghan Shyam Dass Gupta Versus JVVNL & Ors Date of Order ::: 06/11//09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Satyendra Kr. Gupta, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed by petitioner who is working as LDC, assailing order dt.20/10/09 (Ann.4) whereby he was transferred from office of XEN (O&M), Bhawani Mandi to ACOS Jhalrapatan (Jhalawar). Counsel submits that petitioner while holding post of LDC at XEN (O&M) Bhawani Mandi was earlier promoted as Junior Accountant & posted at AO (IA-Rev) Kota vide order dt. 08/01/07 (Ann.1) which he had forgone on account of family circumstances and even while passing order impugned herein, a note has been appended that no TA & DA is admissible due to his transfer being made at his own request, which according to him, is factually incorrect as there has been no request made by him. As per petitioner's own saying, he worked at Bhawani Mandi for more than seven years and has now been transferred vide order impugned within district Jhalawar at a distance of 60-70 kms. He is holding a CW 13838/09 { 2 } transferable post and cannot claim any lien against the post held by him as LDC for sufficient long time; as such if the authority has considered it appropriate to transfer him in the interest of administration, such action of respondent cannot be said to be arbitrary which may call for interference. However, as regards Note appended to the order impugned about claim of TA & DA, petitioner is always free to make representation for claiming TA & DA in case of there being no request of transfer made by him; but that itself cannot be considered to be a ground for interference in the order impugned. It is also not the case of petitioner of having imputed malice on the part of authority transferring him or there being any violation of statutory rules; in the absence whereof, this Court finds no justification to exercise its power of judicial review U/Art.226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, writ petition being devoid of merit is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 13838CW09Nov6-DsTrns.doc