{1} wp1130210.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11302 OF 2010 Sunil Bhaskarrao Dubbewar & others Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.V.D.Salunke, advocate holding for Mr.S.R.Bagal, advocate for petitioners Mr.V.H.Dighe, A.G.P for respondents no.1 to 8. Mr.R.N.Dhorde, advocate for respondents no.106 & 451. Mr.A.N.Irpatgire, advocate for respondent no.448. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 23 rd December, 2010 PER COURT: After hearing the learned Counsel for petitioners at considerable length, when we are not inclined to entertain the petition in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, the learned Counsel for petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the petition so as to take recourse to alternate remedy that is available in law. Petition is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to such remedies, as are available in law. R.M.BORDE B.R.GAVAI JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp1130210