THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P. No.18393 of 2009 03-09-2009 BETWEEN; M/s Blue Star Limited, rep. by its Branch Manager V.V.Raghavan ...Petitioner vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad and others ...Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.18393 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER: (Per GR,J) The writ petition is directed the notice bearing R.C.No.28150108021/2009, dated 28-08-2009 and the garnishee proceedings addressed by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner’s bank- the 3rd respondent seeking recovery of the outstanding arrears of Rs.4,61,38,713/-pursuant to an order of assessment, against which the petitioner has preferred an appeal and along therewith an application for stay of the disputed amount of tax. The appellate authority rejected the stay application by an order dated 07-08-2009. Thereagainst, the petitioner preferred a revision to the 4th respondent on 01-09- 2009. Even before the 4th respondent could consider and dispose of the revision, the revenue authorities are proceeding with coercive steps including by issuing a garnishee order to the 3rd respondent, is the substantive grievance. It is now represented that the 3rd respondent has drawn forwarded a cheque for the requisitioned amount to the 2nd respondent as per the notice dated 28-08-2009. The learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes submits that the 4th respondent would dispose of the revision within one week. In the facts and circumstances, the 4th respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the revision against the 1st respondent’s order dated 07-08-2009, expeditiously and in any event, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall communicate the revisional decision to the petitioner by RPAD. The 2nd respondent is also directed not to present the cheque, if any, issued by the 3rd respondent pursuant to the notice dated 28.08.2009, for a period of one(1) week from the date of communication of the revisional order to the petitioner. Further, the petitioner is also directed not to withdraw Rs.4,61,38,713/- from its account in the 3rd respondent bank, till the disposal of the revision by the 4th respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ GODA RAGHURAM,J __________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 3rd SEPTEMBER 2009. TSNR