1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.146 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2907 OF 2009 1.Shri.Kailas D.Ladke & ors. ...Appellants. vs. 1.Kumar Housing Corpn.Ltd & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.R.A.Thorat & Mr.P.J.Thorat, for Appellants. Mr.Sham Mehta with Ms.F.Behrin Kamdin & Ms.Swati Deshpande i/b. FZB Associates, for Respondent no.1. Mr.J.P.Sen i/b. Ms.S.Nadar, for Respondent no.2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 14th July,2009. 2 P.C.:- 1. Admit. Heard finally by consent of the Appellants and the learned Counsel appearing for Respondent nos.1 & 2. A short grievance of the appellants is that the order dated 12.6.2009 by which Writ Petition no.2907 of 2009 has been disposed of by the learned Single Judge, does not disclose any reasons for disposing of Writ petition no.2907 of 2009. In Writ petition no.2907 of 2009, the mandatory interim order passed by the Co-operative Court was not the subject matter of challenge. What was challenged was rejection of the application filed by the appellants before the Co-operative Court for dismissal of the dispute and the order passed by the Revisional Court. However, the learned Single Judge though has dismissed that writ petition by common order dated 12.6.2009, has not given any reason why she is rejecting Writ Petition no.2907 of 2009. The reasons given by the learned Single Judge are in support of her conclusion that the interim order of the Co- operative Court granting temporary mandatory 3 injunction is not liable to be interfered with. No reasons are given in the order for not entertaining Writ Petition no.2907 of 2007. In this view of the matter therefore, it is held that by common order dated 12.6.2009, a copy of which is annexed to this Appeal, Writ petition no.2907 of 2009 is not disposed of. Office is therefore, directed to place that Writ petition before the appropriate Court for admission. Appeal is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.)