c^ 'erz^-- INTHEHON'BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION(S) No. ^42A OF;2009 PETITIONER K.S. BaghelAged about 57 yeare, S/o Late Shri Y.P.Baghel, Occupation - Deputy Director AgriGulture^ Working at StafeV Insecticide Quality / Contrpl Laboratory, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS ..•' :-s''/y.\-'' ^••'..yy VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Gpvernment of Ghhattisgarh, Department pf Agriculture, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, RaipuF, Chhattisgarh -• 2. Secretary, Government pf ChhattisgarH, Geheral Administration Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chhattisgarh State Pyblic Service Commission, Through Seeretary, Chhattisgarh State Public Service CQmmission, Raipur, •ChFiattisgarh: . , , 1 . ' ' 4. Director, AgriGulture, Directbrate of Agriculture, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Pradeep Kumar Dave, Aged about 54 years, Sio. Shri (Not Known to the pefitioner) Dave, Working on' deputation as 'Deputy Secretary, Governmenf bf Chhattisgarh, Department of Panchayat and f?ural, Development, DKS Bhawan, Manfralaya, Raipur, Chhattjsgarh , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTn'UTIQN ©& INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A VVRIT IN 1-1-IE Nft'I-URliOR l;BRai(Sl^gil IVIANDAMUS; DIRECTION QR I:^ECTIONS,3@RDIftJIj©Ri^@gRi|I?^ THE:LIKE ;; ! ; : •''' 1 .'• • :1:.^;;:'1''^ ^M ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH : Blt-ASPUR PETiTIONER WRIT PETITION (S) NQ. 6432 OF2009 K.S. Baghel A2' Versus RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh S Others (Writ Petition under Articte 226 ofthe Constitution of india) SingieBench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ShriDhiraj Whankhade, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. Generaffor the State. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, counsel forthe respondent No.3. ^ i- Gowri QRDERrORAU (Passed on this 15th day of March,2010) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the submissions made by the State in its return dated 15-3-2010 that a review Departmenta! Promotion Commjttee (DPC) has been directed to be convened today i.e. 15-3-2010, however, the same stand adjourned on account of difriculties and according to the leamed counsel appearing for the State, the DPC woutd be convened at the eariiest within a period of four weeks, nothingsurvives in this petition for adjudlcation. 2) Accordingty, the writ petitlon is dismi^ed as having become infructuous. Sd/- ^SatishK.AgnihoU-i -\— —Judge II 1:1