BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14547 of 2011 KISMIS BALAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.245/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.NATARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused in Cr.No.245 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 307 of I.P.C., apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner has already involved in a case relating to the murder of his wife. After facing the trial, the petitioner has got acquittal in that case. Thereafter, on 03.10.2011, it is alleged that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with aruval on his neck and head. The injured was in hospital for more than 10 days and thereafter he has been discharged. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent. He has not committed any offence. Further, he would submit that due to the above said previous motive relating to murder of his wife, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. I have considered the above submissions. Though the fact remains that the injured has been discharged from hospital, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ considering the motive behind the occurrence and also considering the fact that the petitioner has killed his wife, even though he has been acquitted in the murder case, he has not shown any change in his attitude, which is very evident from the occurrence and he has caused number of injuries on the defacto complainant, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. In such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- 10/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT ssk/15.11.2011 /3c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14547 of 2011 Date :10/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/