((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1666 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3122 OF 2008 Radheshyam Banarasi Vishwakarma Plaintiff versus M/s.Seth Builders Pvt.Ltd. Defendant and Ashok Parsnath Mishra & anr. Respondents A.O.Shukla i/by R.D.Mishra for plaintiff. Ms.A.V.Khanolkar for defendant. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 02nd December 2008 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff in support of the Chamber Summons. I have heard the counsel for the defendant who has opposed the Chamber Summons. 2. The suit has been lodged on 17th October 2008. The amendment sought by the Chamber Summons is of impleading the respondents as party defendants on the basis of an allegation that on 24th October 2008 the respondents to the Chamber Summons have been inducted in the suit premises. ((-2-)) 3. The amendment will not change the nature of the suit and the same deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Liberty to the plaintiff to take out Notice of Motion praying for appropriate interim relief. (A.S.OKA, J.)