IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2009 M/S. TRIMURTI EXPORTS REP. BY ITS PARTNER SHRI BHALCHANDRA BAKHALE AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. V. A. Lawande,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.H.Parab, Advocate for the respondent No.3 Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Govt. Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 15th June, 2009 P.C. The challenge in the petition is to the order dated 7.5.2009. The said order was interlocutory order and final orders in the matter was passed on 13.5.2009. The said interlocutory order does not survive and the grievance made in the petition is rendered infructuous at least at this stage. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 has urged that the petition as filed is not maintainable. However, in view of the above position, without going into the merits on the controversy, we find that the petition is rendered infructuous in view of the subsequent orders. The petition is disposed of without prejudice to the rights of the respective parties. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA