In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No.M-19319 of 2008 Date of decision: 4.5.2009 State of Haryana ......Petitioner Versus Manoj Devi and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents. Mr.Shailender Mohan, Advocate, for the complainant. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed under Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondents by the learned Sessions Judge, Hisar vide order dated 9.5.2008 in case FIR No. 227 dated 28.4.2008, under Sections 20/406/467/506/107/120-B of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar. As per the learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant, respondents/accused are threatening the investigating agency as well as the complainant. In the Criminal Misc. No.M-19319 of 2008 -2- circumstances, the appropriate remedy for the State as well as the complainant was to approach the Sessions Judge, Hisar for cancellation of bail. Moreover, now challan is stated to have been presented. The respondents must have been allowed regular bail. Hence, no interference is called for. It is, however, clarified that any finding on merit given by the learned Sessions Judge, Hisar, while granting bail vide order dated 9.5.2008, shall not be treated as an opinion on the merits of the case. (SABINA) JUDGE May 04, 2009 anita