IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3072 of 2009 Decided on: May 06, 2010. Ms. Shivani Jagotra ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved since she is not offered appointment as TGT(Medical). The objection apparently is that the petitioner did not satisfy the subject combination. We have already held in our decision rendered in CWP No. 171 of 2010, Kapil Dev Vs. State of H.P., decided on 29th April, 2010 that as far as the qualification for appointment to the post is concerned, the same should be governed by the position as it obtained prior to the amendment in R&P Rules on 22.10.2009. The petitioner is a candidate, who applied and who qualified as per R&P Rules, as it existed prior to the amendment. There is no dispute that there was a vacancy also available. Therefore, the petitioner should also be treated to be duly qualified in case she is otherwise eligible. 2. We are informed that being a batchwise appointment, she has been found eligible. There will be a direction to the second respondent-Director to look into the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action within two weeks on production of copy of this judgment. 3. The petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 6, 2010(K/s) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge