IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5588 of 2008 Decided on: 04.10.2010 Tek Chand. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Man Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Man Singh, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 4, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?