THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTIC RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.19557 of 2005 Dated 28-03-2006 Between: P. Chandrasekhar Reddy. .. Petitioner And The Correspondent, National High School, Nagarkurnool, Mahaboobnagar, and two others. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTIC RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.19557 of 2005 ORDER: Questioning the proceedings dated 13-06-2005 issued by the first respondent as arbitrary, in violation of the principles of natural justice and contrary to Sections 79 and 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, the present writ petition is filed. This Court, while ordering notice before admission, by order dated 05-09-2005, held that the question as to whether any enquiry was held while dismissing the petitioner should be taken into account by the Regional Joint Director of School Education and he shall pass appropriate orders as regards grant of approval within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Having regard to the nature of allegations against the petitioner, this Court made it clear that any default on the part of the Regional Joint Director in complying with the order would be treated as dereliction of duties on his part. The learned Government Pleader for School Education placed before this Court a copy of the proceedings dated 18-10-2005 issued by the Regional Joint Director of School Education, wherein the proposals submitted by the first respondent-School for approval of the termination orders issued against the petitioner were rejected since all the three cases filed against him in various Courts had resulted in his acquittal and his having been found not guilty of the offences punishable under various sections. The first respondent was requested to reinstate the petitioner into service immediately and report compliance. In view of the proceedings dated 18-10-2005 issued by the Regional Joint Director, refusing to grant approval of termination and directing the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service, the cause in the writ petition no longer survives. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _____________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Dated 28-03-2006 ghn