ra_'EHB_BI8H GS'^OTBIG.M'SBB'SZ.BII^FOB teaaa'ens&ABH). ffiIT TEi'IIIOT Ho, . •2-s- / 200^ PBIIIIOJ Saatraa ffimallcar, son of Biharilal EH.raalfcar, agad aboB'fe ?1 yars, reslden'fe of Tillage IB.Kan, Mst: Barg (Gh'na^Usgarh ) '7erstt& RSSPOTOBN'iS : ../^/ ^/^^ ^y ./^^' ./"^'/"- 1^.--/ ^' ^' y ..?"*»••" <^' <s?" SBIT PgriTION 1. Sat.Surjil; Kaur Gill, wife 6f So'aaia SiBgh &ill, G-ill Gomplex, Darg (0.&). 2. State Bank of Ind±a,Burg, BaTBUg&s Its Manager, (Gfahattisgarii) • 3« Coiasiissioaer for Wortaaen "' Compeasation, Barg (G.S). ^gZICES 227 O? TOE 00 !'ETTff'CTOM"- :IHBIA BEMTt^ CW THB PETr'PIOff w ?a-iHC—?s a^ ws .r c..- r<, •»^ F^ -^WMil, eSTll^'Kc, fsldiyy ,....iJ.^.^G..:.^L/.2^0L. 3^T T^ (^?f3iR?) *i^lrt4)-< •wrcif if fe^t i? 3TfW 3(1^1 14.01.2002 Shri Raj Knmar Gu^ita, Counsel for tbe petitioner. Heard. This petition . faa^ been preferred against the order I dt.17.10.2001 whereby ^he respondent No.3 bas declined to give pennission for preinatui^ fixed deposit. wifbidrawal of the aiuouat deposited in Counsel for the peti,tioner subiaits fhat the petitioner's onjy son Toraalal had died and ijlnder fhe Workinen Coinpensation Act the respondent No.3 i.e. C^mmissioner for Worknien Conipeasation \^ ' ' • awarded aa amount of Rjs.1,56,746/- as coiupensation. He ftuther subniits fhat fhe petitio^ier is suffering fi'oiu Cardiaal Respiratoiy probleiu aad as such he requires a sum of Rs.50,000/- for inedical treatment which is depo^ited iii F.D.R.. He further submits that he applied for wiffadrawal cjf fhe amount but by the impugaed order j • permission for witlidrawajl has been refased. 5Q.HG—78 SfT't'51 ^nww W aitffww '3^~-:TPTR;R, ^ftWR, 3Irwq^r( ^qfeNh'qFRff •? fe<^ ^R$R ^sifwTsii^t Having considered fhe facts and cu-cuiiistances of fhe case, xaaterial on record aud ijhe fact that thg m.oney wbich has been deposited ia F.D.R. is his |own inoney and be requires oaly a siim of t Rs.50,000/- towards his ^nedical treatment, the petition is allowed. It is directed fhat au acao^mt of Rs.50,000/- be disbursed forthwith to fhe petitioner by th^ respondent No.2 as early as possible preferably within 7 days fi(om the date ofproduction of certified copy of fhis order. If ftiere ^s auy non-compliance of this order, fhe petitioner is at liberty to b^ing ftie same to the notice offhis Court. Certified photocopy ^s per rules. —_——— j^ Fakhruddin j Judge