1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7180 OF 2011 Appasaheb Dadasaheb Avachar & Others ...Petitioners Versus Shivendrasinghraje /so.Abhaysinghraje Bhosale & Others ...Respondents Mr.V.A.Sonpal i/b. Laxman Suryavanshi for the Petitioners CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 29th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. 1. The petitioners have filed Regular Civil Suit No.111 of 2007 in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Daund, District Pune.. The petitioners claim that they are the owners in respect of the property and therefore the defendants should not enter upon the said property and interfere with their possession. After filing of the suit, the petitioners filed application below Exhibit 98 for recasting of the issues. The issues were already framed and burden was put on the petitioners to prove that they are in possession of the property 2 described in the suit and they were also required to prove that the defendants were interfering with their possession. The petitioner seems to have suggested in the application below Exhibit 98 that as many as 7 issues should be framed on the basis of the written statement filed by the respondent defendants. After having perused the record, in my view, if the issues as sought to be suggested are accepted it would unnecessarily dilate the suit and the real controversy between the parties may not be decided. In the present suit it is necessary for the petitioner to prove that they are the owners of the property and that the defendants have no right to enter upon the said property and related aspects. In my view, the learned Judge has taken correct view of the matter and has rightly rejected the said application on 15.3.2011. No interference is required. Hence the order. ORDER Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)