IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49663 of 2008 RAMBABOO CHAUDHARY @ RAM NANDAN CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 22.1.2010 There appears to be certain errors in factual aspect of the order, dated 4.1.2010. Paragraph 3 of the Ist page should, thus, be corrected and read that “the petitioner is said to have purchased the lands from Radha Devi, opposite party no. 2 in the name of his wife Kakai Devi. Thereafter, Radha Devi filed a suit and a criminal case against the petitioner claiming that the sale deed has wrongly been registered in favour of Kakai Devi, wife o the petitioner, predecessor in interest. It is stated that the petitioner and his wife vendee were acquitted in the criminal case and that T.S. No. 44/1984 was decided in favour of the petitioner’s vendor.” Paragraph 4 of the Ist page should be read “on the basis of the aforesaid fact, it is submitted that the vendee remained in possession and subsequently sold the land to Sabuja Devi.” Further correction should be made in paragraph 1 of the 2nd page and should be read that “it is quite clear that the petitioner’s wife was declared bona fide purchaser by a judgment of the civil court which is Annexure 9 to this petition.” haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)