IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 RPFC.No. 124 of 2009 ( ) ======================== MC.6/2008 of FAMILY COURT,KOTTARAKARA ..... REVISION PETITIONER(S)/(CR.PETITIONER) ===================================== K.R.PRASAD S/O. RAGHAVAN, K.R.THEATRE, THAZHATHU MURI, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV.SRI.ALEX N.MATHEW (KOLLAM) RESPONDENT(S)/(PETITIONERS) =========================== 1. JALAJA KUMARI D/O. DEVAKI, MALAYIL K.R.BHAVAN, KIZHAKKEKARA MURI,VELIYAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA. 2. KRISHNA PRASAD (MINOR), AGED 10 YEARS, S/O. JALAJA KUMARI, -DO- -DO- REP. BY JALAJA KUMARI, RESPONDENT - 1. 3. VISHNU PRASAD (MINOR), AGED 6 YEARS, S/O. JALAJA KUMARI, -DO- -DO- REP. BY JALAJA KUMARI, RESPONDENT-1. BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL, SRI.SAIJU S., SRI.C.SINOY. THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-12-2011 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss RPFC.NO.124/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX.1: COPY OF ORDER IN CMP 386/08 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKARA DTD. 30/04/08. ANNEX.II: COPY OF ORDER IN M.C.6/08 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKARA DTD. 27/06/08. ANNEX.III: COPY OF ORDER IN CMP 628/08 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKARA DTD. 27/06/08. ANNEX.IV: COPY OF ORDER IN M.C.6/08 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKARA DTD. 09/09/08. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------------- R.P.(F.C)No.124 of 2009 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13rd day of December, 2011 O R D E R Challenge in the revision is against an order awarding maintenance to the wife and two children from the husband/father, the petitioner in a proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ”the Code”). 2. Previously when the revision came up for consideration, counsel on both sides submitted that the parties have almost settled the disputes between themselves, and, an opportunity was sought for to report the full settlement effected for recording the same. 3. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner/husband. However, the counsel for the respondent, who is present, R.P.(F.C)No.124 of 2009 :: 2 :: submits that the wife and children, in whose favour the order impugned had been passed, are fully satisfied with the settlement effected. In the light of the submissions made as above, revision is closed, without expressing any opinion o the settlement purported to have been effected. Sd/- (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE sk/- //true copy// P.S. to Judge.