BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13478 of 2011 R.RAMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE EAST POLICE STATION, KOVILKPATTY , IN CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.RAJAMOHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, the petitioner, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, has come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, would submit that as a matter of fact, a case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.877 of 2011 under Section 381 of IPC. 4. The allegation is that a sum of Rs.78,000/- which was kept in the bank, where the petitioner was working on temporary basis, was found missing. There is suspicion against the petitioner. 5. In the anticipatory bail petition, these allegation are denied. 6. Simply because he was working as a temporary employee, how a case could be registered against him on suspicion. 7. A perusal of the FIR would go to show that the petitioner is shown only as a suspected accused. Thus, there si a prima facie case in favour of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 8. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Kovilpatty, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 8 weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. Sd/- 14/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I KOVILPATTI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE EAST POLICE STATION, KOVILKPATTY, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. R.RAJAMOHAN Advocate SR.No.35675 ssk/14.10.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13478 of 2011 Date :14/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/