Crl. Misc. No.M-11411 of 2011 (O&M) *** Gurmeet Maan Vs. State of Haryana Present : Mrs. Kiran Bala Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, D.A.G., Haryana. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.89 dated 29.04.2010 registered under Sections 148, 149, 302, 34 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala. On 25.04.2011 the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that initially petitioner was not named in the FIR, however, co-accused has made disclosure statement that at the time of occurrence petitioner was pillion rider on the motorcycle and was present with the other accused. Learned counsel has further argued that no role has been attributed to the petitioner except that he was present with the other co-accused. Learned counsel has contended that even PW1 has not assigned any specific role to the petitioner. She further contends that now application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been moved to summon others to face trial so there would be inordinate delay and in view of the dictum of Hon'ble Apex Crl. Misc. No.M-11411 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Court in the matter of State of Kerala vs. Raneef, 2011(1) RCR (Criminal) 381 petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Notice of motion for 2.5.2011.” On instructions from ASI Yameen learned Deputy Advocate General has accepted these factual assertions. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) May 26, 2011. JUDGE ashish