C.Rev. No. 68 of 2009. 14.12.2010 Present: Mr. Adarsh Vashisth Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. RM Bhist, Dy.AG, Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy.AG & Mr. Vikas Rathour Dy.AG for the respondents 1&2. CMP(M) No. 1157 of 2009. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the Civil Review is condoned. C.Rev. No. 68 of 2009. By means of this Civil Review petition the petitioner seeks to re-call the order dated 6.10.2009. The main grounds of review are that while passing order dated 6.10.2009, this Court has held that JBT Course run by Gandhi Hindi Vidya Peeth is not recognized for employment. According to learned counsel for the petitioner this course is recognized by the Central Government. The second ground is that this Court wrongly held that the Baby Teachers Certificate is not equivalent to the JBT certificate. 2. As far as the first ground is concerned, reliance is placed on Annexure-P/3, which is actually only a recommendation made by the Department of Education and Culture. There is nothing on record to show that this recommendation was acted upon by the Central Government. As far as second ground is concerned this Court held that Baby Teachers Certificate is not equivalent to JBT Teachers. Now on the basis of some material, it is urged that other persons having this Baby Teachers Certificate were given employment in the State. These points were not taken either in the original application or in the writ petition. No such material was -2- placed on record with the writ petition. 3. Mr. Adarsh Vashisth learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that he may be permitted to place such material on record. This cannot be allowed at this stage. We therefore, find no merit in the Review Petition which is accordingly dismissed. (Deepak Gupta), Judge. (V.K.Ahuja), Judge. December 14,2009. (KC)