S $mm§ ama@ éF‘mL. IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR_(C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) No. mm” OF 2006 PETITIONER Parshu Ram Rai Son of Shri Ka :ilash Rai, aged about 58 years, 580, Head Constable, Railway Protection Force, South Eastern ‘ Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.). 244‘ Pmen,0’ Potsracg a? KPF Thqna Ra-gw’h VERSUS «”w m- RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India, Through: The Secretary, Department of Raiiway ,3. New Delhi. 2. The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.). ‘ 3 . The Divisional Security CommissioherfRal'lW’ay Protection Force, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The ASSI Stant Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CDNSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950. FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN' THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION 'OR DIRECTIONS. Security XI—HC—78 HW,WW,W 93/ WWI—WWW?» wommx 1H 200 é Wm (W) WWW WWW WW§WW WWW aaWaném 10-08-2006 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Amit Choudhary, Standing Counsei with Ms. Yoshita Masih, advance copy. Advocate for the respondents, Heard. The main grievance of t e petitioner is that the petitioner remained under suspension with effect fro 27—1 1-2000 to 21-1 1-2003. The enquiry was conducted against the peti ioner in which the penalty of reduction in rank for a period of 6 month was imposed. However, no order was passed regarding the salary o be paid to the petitioner during this . suspension period, therefore, t e petitioner is entitied to the salary during suspension period Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has not made any represe ation regarding his grievances to the respondents, otherwise res ondents could have decided his representation and passed app ‘ priate order. Having heard learned nsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to make a representation to the responc ent No.4 within a period of 2 weeks from . today and in turn, respondent No.4 shali decide the representation of the petitioner after considering all the points raised by the petitioner, within a period of 2 months from the date ofreceipt of the representation, in accordance with law. Withithe direction aforesz id, the petition stands disposed of. / / Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. n c u