IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27678 of 2010 Prakash Chaudhary, Son of Mano Chaudhary, resident of Village- Shukhsena Tirashi Toal, P.S. Barhara Kothi, District-Purnea ---------------------------------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 06 03-03-2011 Heard Sri Vijay Shankar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Sessions Trial No.143 of 2010 arising out of Barhara P.S. Case No.135 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. The petitioner was the husband of daughter of the informant. It was alleged that accused persons including the petitioner has done to death the daughter of the informant and thereafter her dead body was also burnt. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, father and mother of the petitioner have been granted bail vide Cr.Misc.No.20729 of 2010 and Cr.Misc.No.15822 of 2010 respectively. In the facts and circumstances, the court is of the opinion that the petitioner does not deserve to privilege of bail in view of the fact that the case has been committed and charge has already been framed. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite charge was framed on 21.01.2010, till date not even a single 2 witness has been examined. The learned trial court is directed to take steps so that the case may come to its logical end without any delay. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)