{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.194 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4928 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra & others APPLICANTS VERSUS Tukaram Bhagwanta Debre & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.V.Kurundkar, Addl.G.P. for applicants Mr.N.V.Gaware, Advocate for applicant No.1 to 4 Mr.A.K.Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No.5 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE :25th November 2009 PER COURT: 1. This review application has been filed in Writ Petition No.4928/2009, which came to be disposed of by us, by order dated 5th October 2009. When this matter had been listed before us (P.V.Hardas, J. & A.V.Potdar, J.), on 5th October 2009, learned AGP, on instructions had stated that election of respondent No.5 cooperative society would be conducted in accordance with the amended bye laws. In that light of the statement, therefore, {2} Mr.N.V.Gaware, learned counsel, who represented the petitioners in that petition, had sought to withdraw the aforesaid writ petition. This Court had accepted the aforesaid statement made by the learned AGP, on behalf of the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Shrigonda, Dist-Ahmednagar, as an undertaking and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. 2. By this review application, therefore, learned AGP states that the aforesaid statement was made inadvertently by the respondents to the petition and, therefore, seeks to withdraw the aforesaid statement. 3. We have heard Mr.Kurundkar, learned AGP on behalf of the applicants, Mr.N.V.Gaware, learned counsel, who represented the respondents, original petitioners and Mr.A.K.Tiwari, learned counsel who appears for respondent No.5 society. For the reasons stated in the review application, we allow this review application and permit the learned AGP to withdraw the aforesaid statement. Consequently, we recall our order dated 5th October 2009 and direct that the petition be listed before the Regular Court for admission. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/RA194-09