IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1173 of 2009 Date of Decision: 29.7.2009 Harinder Singh ....Petitioner. Versus Tejpal Singh and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the orders dated 26.11.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial court whereby the evidence of the claimant-petitioner has been closed by the order of the Court and dated 19.2.2009 (Annexure P-2) whereby the application for recalling the order dated 26.11.2008 was dismissed. Counsel for the claimant-petitioner submits that the claimant has to examine 13 witnesses and in the interest of justice, two dates may be granted to the petitioner to lead his entire evidence and the respondents can be compensated by way of costs. He further submits that the petitioner will conclude his entire evidence at his own risk and responsibility on the two dates to be fixed by the trial court. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and in the C.R. No. 1173 of 2009 -2- facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is satisfied that in the interest of justice the petitioner deserves to be granted two dates to conclude his entire evidence. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall be granted two dates to lead his entire evidence on the dates to be fixed by the trial Court at his own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of Rs.2,000/- to the respondents as costs. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner fails to conclude his entire evidence on the two dates to be fixed by the trial Court or to pay the costs, as stipulated above, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. July 29, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE