CS(OS) No. 2536/2008 Page 1 of 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No. 2536/2008 % Date of Decision: 20.03.2009 Jaipur IPL Cricket Pvt. Ltd. …. Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anish Dayal, Advocate. Versus Mr. Kamlesh Goel & Anr. …. Defendants Through: Ms. Meghna Mishra and Mr. Jatin Monga, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * + IA No.3754/2009 in CS(OS) No.2536/2008 This is an application by the parties for decreeing the suit in terms of the compromise dated 18th March, 2009 arrived at between the parties. A photocopy of the settlement agreement incorporating the terms of the settlement has been filed with the application. The original settlement dated 18th March, 2009 has been filed in the Court which is taken on record. Under the settlement, defendant No. 2, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd., has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 4.25 Crores to the plaintiff after deducting the TDS. CS(OS) No. 2536/2008 Page 2 of 3 As has been agreed between the parties, the said amount has been paid today in the Court by Cheque No. 461983 dated 17th March, 2009, drawn on Axis Bank Ltd., Bund Garden Road, Ashoka Galaxy, Pune- 411 001 in favour of Jaipur IPL Cricket Pvt. Ltd. The cheque has been accepted by the counsel for the plaintiff in full and final settlement of all the claims of the plaintiff against the defendants. The defendants have also agreed that their relationship under the MOU dated 31st March, 2008 with the plaintiff has been terminated and extinguished and defendant No. 2 has agreed not to represent himself as having any association, in any manner or form whatsoever with plaintiff. The parties have also agreed to issue a common statement to the Media in terms of annexure-A annexed with the settlement dated 18th March, 2009. The application is signed by Mr. Satyen Saraswat, Authorized Signatory of the plaintiff and by defendants No. 1 and 2 and their respective counsels and is also supported by the affidavit of Mr. Satyen Saraswat, Authorized Signatory of the plaintiff and Authorized Signatory of the defendant No. 2 and defendant No. 1. There does not seem to be any impediment in allowing the application. The settlement arrived at between the parties is exhibited as Ex. P-1. Consequently, the application is allowed and the suit of the plaintiff be decreed in terms of Ex. P-1, a photocopy of which is filed with the application and original of which has been filed in the Court. CS(OS) No. 2536/2008 Page 3 of 3 The application stands disposed of. CS(OS) No.2536/2008 The disputes between the parties have been settled. The parties have filed an application for decreeing the suit in terms of the settlement dated 18th March, 2009 which is Ex. P-1. The application being IA No.3754/2009 has been allowed. Consequently, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed in terms of the settlement dated 18th March, 2009, arrived at between the parties which is Ex. P-1. Decree sheet be drawn where Ex. P-1 shall form part of the decree. All the pending applications are also disposed of and parties are left to bear their own costs. A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties. MARCH 20, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. sb