I IN 1IIi HI Ii CCI ki’ OFF NA Al \ tIk( I 1I HLN( 11 I (1[IL13ARErA I) ii’ IS 11tH 18 ‘l)\Y 1 X 10 FR, 20 13FF i<F I lIlt H ‘N FLit MNJUSTiCE SUJ3EIASFI B. ADI WI A. No 8€ )6 (M 2007 (MV) 1111W H I U I Ito iNi IA tSL RANCH ( ‘U 11FF) 1 VISION F )kAWNL1 (t)1FjltA 4 ) kT)ffi Itiisli U\’ IYIISMANAGIR AF F 1 LAN1 plY 8FF MA ‘JVItNDFA HF DDY, c )V) Li I. AOF,l) 27 VF,rFS S/0 SI 1311 511 AGED ABOUT 27 iDMS F /Al’ LUHAR (1ALLI ( T LT APGA 2 N\RISA OFD\ AGFD MAJOR S/U. ‘YAI)AVO{JLPA R/ VI LAXMI OF N I SHAIIAI3AD (JFiLYIAPLR TO GIJL’1RGA DIST 3 kA 4 ihFMAI< A b)MAJOR 5/0 1 ANiilb\RI P/AT Ii NO 2274/4 JAG\1. GULFIAPEA RESPONDENTS 2 (BY SRI. SHARANABASAPPA K BABSHETI’Y. ADV.) THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 5.3.2007 PASSED IN MVC NO. 265/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), MEMBER, MACT. GULBARGA, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF RS.98,200/- WITH INTEREST © 8% P.A FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in a connected appeal filed in MFA No.8667/2007 has been dismissed by tiis Court vide order dated 01.06.20 10 and submits that this case also raises out of the same accident and the claimants were coolies. 2. This Court considering the said aspect of the matter, dismissed the appeal holding that the award by the Motor Accident Claimants Tribunal is just and proper. Accordingly, in view of the same, this appeal is also dismissed. C ii JJ