FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5261 OF 2011 "Ramakant B. Kendre Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate holding for Mr. R.L. Kute, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.B. Khandare, Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.5. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 22nd JULY, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking the following relief :- "B]Quash and set aside the order dated 12.7.2011, passed by the learned Member, Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai, Bench at Aurangabad, in Original Application NO. 456/2011 granting stay upto 22.7.2011, order dated 8.7.2011, issued by the respondent No.1 and communication/letter dated 12.7.2011, issued by the respondent No.2 and for that purpose issue necessary orders. 2] We have perused the order dated 12th July, 2011, passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, and para.4 thereof, in particular. In para.4 of the order, the Tribunal has FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5261 OF 2011 "Ramakant B. Kendre Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 observed thus : " Accordingly, respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are directed not to direct the applicant to hand over the charge of his present posting at Parbhani to respondent No.5 by implementing the communication/order dated 12th July, 2011 issued by respondent No.2.” 3] In view of this observations, Mr. Khandare, learned Govt. Pleader, submits that no orders are necessary in this writ petition since the order dated 12th July, 2011 protects the interest of the petitioner. 4] From perusal of the observations quoted above, it is clear that the petitioner is allowed to continue to hold the charge, till disposal of the original application. We are informed that the original application is kept for hearing on 25/7/2011. 5] In the circumstances, no interference is called for in the instant petition. Writ petition is disposed of. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-