CW 2692/08 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.2692/2008 Heera Lal Versus State & Others. Date of Order ::: 29/06/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Anoop Dhand, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed by some of local residents of village Banuda Tehsil Danta Ramgarh (Sikar) assailing order dt.29/02/08 (Ann.9) of District Collector, Sikar conveying decision of district legal committee headed by Collector having been taken with the consensus of respective representatives for changing the name of primary health Centre, Banuda as Freedom Figher Shri Birad Singh PHC Banuda. Counsel submits that petitioners raised objections against change made by Collector in nomenclature of primary health Centre, Banuda as per decision taken by district level committee in its meeting held on 16/02/08; but their objections have not been taken note of. Counsel further submits that family members of so-called freedom fighter Shri Birad Singh have made encroachment over the government property and despite their representations made, the same has not been taken note of by the authority. It appears from the decision impugned CW 2692/08 //2// taken by district level committee in its meeting held on 16/02/08 that not only government officials but public representative including Pradhan of Panchayat Samiti, Dantaram Garh & Laxmangarh; and other freedom fighters and local residents of village Banuda also participated, and only after their consensus having majority view, the decision was taken by the Committee headed of Collector, Sikar for changing nomenclature of primary health centre of Banuda, in the name of freedom fighter Shri Birad Singh. These are all administrative decisions which do not infringe legal right of the petitioners to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court U/Art.226 of the Constitution. As regards submission made by Counsel that petitioners have not been heard, suffice is to say that the committee headed by Collector Sikar was constituted of public representatives including Government officers and freedom fighters and the nomenclature of primary health centre Banuda was changed in the name of freedom fighter Shri Birad Singh on their majority view and consensus, which shows about representation on behalf of local residents of village Banuda. As regards further submission that family members of freedom fighter Shri Birad Sing have CW 2692/08 //3// encroached upon Government property, suffice is to say that no material has been placed on record by which any inference in this regard could be drawn by this Court; and for any such encroachment as alleged by petitioners, they are free to approach the competent authority which is expected to consider their grievance. Taking note of material on record, this Court has gone through order impugned and finds no justification to interfere in the decision impugned about change of nomenclature of primary health centre. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.3/2692CW08Jun29Ds.doc