IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1739 of 2011 SATYANARAYAN PATEL @ SATTO PATEL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by counsel appearing for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 42 of 2010 registered under section-302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section-27 of the Arms Act. Admittedly, the petitioner is not named in the FIR but in course of investigation, his name surfaced in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither there is any eye witness nor there is any circumstantial evidence available against the petitioner to connect the petitioner in the alleged crime. On the otherhand, learned counsel appearing for the informant points out that the I.O. has collected sufficient circumstantial evidence to show the complicity of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner was seen with the deceased just before the alleged occurrence and looking glass of the motorcycle of the petitioner was found on the place of occurrence. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner, namely, - 2 - Satyanarayan Patel @ Satto Patel is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 42 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)