SS^S^KW^^-SSS^^ ^^^ j€^^ "^ / i' ^ . - %s^s^ "^i^^ii \:^ \^ PETITIONERS (Decree Holders) RESPONDENTS: (Judgment Debtors) HIGH COURT Oti: CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.I\ (227) No. 4592/2010 1. S^na Bai (dead-through LR?s) A. Gajendra Puri, Son of Chitrasen Puri, aged about 58 years, B. Pradeep Puri, Son of Chitrasen Puri, aged about 45 years, C. Pushpa Bai wife of Anil Puri, aged about 55 years, D. Sandeep Puri Son of Anil Puri, aged about 35 years, All R/o Village Belora, Tahsil Kurud, District Dharntari (C.G.). 2. Suiyasen Puri (Dead) (Through LR's) A. Ashok Puri Son of Surya Sen Puri, aged about 55 years, B. Charuchand Puri, Son of Surya Sen Puri, aged about 45 years, C. Shivkant Puri, Son of Surya Sen Puri, aged about 40 years, D. Ganga Bai wife of Suryasen Puri, aged about 70 years, All R/o Village Demar, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Anand Puri (Dead-through LR's) A. Geeta Puri, wife of Anand Puri, aged about 65 years, B. Usha Bai D/o Anand Puri, (dead- - issueless) C. Vinod Puri, Son of Anand Puri, aged about 46 years, D. Lalit Puri Son of Anand Puri, aged about 40 years E. Gopal Puri Son ofAnand Puri, aged about 35 years. F. Ku. Sandhya D/o Anand Puri, aged about 30 years G. Ku. Vandana D/o Anand Puri, aged about 28 years H. Ku. Seema D/o Anand Puri (dead- unmarried). I. Ku. Heera D/o Anand Puri, aged about 24 years J. Ku. Maya, D/o Anand Puri, aged about 22 years All R/o Village Demar, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (C.G.). ^-' ^f^^^ 5 I ""^'^ 1 ^, '^^../ \^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon>ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri V.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Respondents not noticed. ORAL- ORDER ""'•^ (Passedon 18/08/2010) 1. Heard. 2. Order dated 06/02/10 passed by Additional District Judge, DhamtariinexecutionproceedingNo. 16-A/1943 perused. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners frankly submits that execution proceeding i.e. proceeding for preparation for flnal decree is pending before the Court below since 1943 therefore Court below be directed to expedite the proceeding. 4. Considering the pendency of execution proceeding Court below is directed to expedite the proceeding pending before it and decide as early as possible preferably within 6 months, this petition is stands disposed of. 5. No order as to costs. Sd/- TR Sharma Judge <v/