IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15149 of 2009 1. JATHU @ SANWL HEMBRAM 2. SANJHALI HANSDA 3. USUF HANSDA 4. TALLU HANSDA ---------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 17.12.2009 According to learned counsel, this may be a case of husband’s next marriage with another girl but not a case for offence under section 498A IPC that also involving the second wife, her brother and one foreigner to relations even. Next marriage has also been explained pointing out the assertion made in the informatory petition to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar that the complainant eloped with tutor of their children and did not comply to reside with petitioner no.1 decided by a Panchayat even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 2392 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)