IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33458 of 2010 PRIYANKA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR 02. 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner along with his brother Raj Kumar Chaudhary is alleged for agreeing to sell some pieces of land for consideration money of Rs.12,11,000/- by executing a deed after receiving Rs.2,11,000/- as part of the consideration money. Later on Rs.1,00,000/- was also handed over. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that sale deed could not be executed due to non-payment of rest of the amount and part of the consideration money, if was paid not to this petitioner rather his brother Raj Kumar Chaudhary. It is specifically said that complainant should take initiative for specific performance of the contract to sell approaching the Competent Court which could only resolve the real grievance, but only to cast pressure, this case is lodged entitling petitioner for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month 2 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Randhir Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No.3796-C.A/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)