T /y-^ ^ ^ ^_ ms^^ ^^iss^ [-HG—78 -26 'T^T •^i^i<n^,^ti1'(H4i<o, [s)(n!-H^< e?i?^i-^y C^N- ?I^T ^?^T ^"^N' .W^?T ^^ ( ^?^<1H) I^iTWH^^lt^i Sinole Bench; Hon'ble Mri W.P. Csl (Petition U/A 226/22' ^l^fa4ltT TITR^ff ^ "fe^ iPt'^K ^•3tfN3??^T . Justice Dhi'rendra Mishra) No.96/09 Petitioner Paikhal about Veteril bispen| of Constitution of India) Lal r)hruv, S/o Bansilal bhruv, aged 35 years, Occupation- Assistant lary Field Officer, Veterinary ^ary, Rcnge District bantewada (C.&.) Vs Respondents 1. Sta|te of Chhattisgarh, Through Secjretary, ^epartment of Agriculture (Vef'erinary) Mantrolaya, O.K.S. Bhawan, Rai||iur (C<5) 2. Depjuty Dir^ctor, Veterinary Services/ barft-ewada, bist. bantewada (CG) Present: Mr. Atul Pandey, Adv. for the pe|t-itioner. Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Adv^cate for the respondents. 12.01.2009 Heard. Grievance of the petit Veterinary Field Officer and Ronge, District bahtewada. He oner is that he is working as pasted at Veterinary bispensary, IQS been transferred to A.I. Sub- centre, Aadawal, District bant^wada vide order of Annexure P-1 dated 7.7.2008, however, his tr^nsfer order has not been complied ^!w3^^,. ^"^ '^ ^ fk^^ 1 1 "^JJ "^^^:^^' • ^r' ?^[ ^i^i<nq, ^'al<H^<o, T®i<ni^^< ^TW1T<1»W«K '^ 200 ^1^?^^^' ^ii 3i!^l ITO^ ^ ^T^T'?:I^F (<^3^?) "^RHW ^ft^'sn^? -2. ^^lfe^^^^^ ^S <M^B< ^^iw^n^? with and the petitioner has no1j been relieved from his present place of posting. Mr. Bhatia, learned Deput^ fresh representation for being f Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents SL^mits that if the petitioner files ). 'elieved before respondent No.2/ the Same shall be considered ^nd decided by respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks] representation. In view of the above, th| direction to the petitioner to m<| ten days from today, along with| respondent No.2 herein, raisin^ his grievance, raised in this petition. On such representatior| of two weeks from the date of re] Certified copy as per rules.| from the date of receipt of s petition is disposed of with a ,ke detailed representation within certified copy of this order/to being made, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same in a<|:cordance with law-jfflthin a period ^eipt of the representation. Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra Judge ^i^N^^ ^U^4<M-ii^(M—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000.