In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh L.P.A. No. 1128 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: July 07 , 2011 Union of India and others ---Appellants versus Onkar Nath Dhar ---Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mrs. K.K.Kahlon, Advocate, for the appellants *** 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. 1. The only question which has been decided by learned Single Judge is that the migrant from Jammu and Kashmir or the employees who were transferred from Jammu and Kashmir, if they had retired, are not to vacate the official accommodation till the time they are rehabilitated in their respective homes in the valley. The issues raised in the instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in J.L.Koul and others v. State of Jammu and Kashmir in Civil Appeal No. 3809 of 2005 decided on 27.10.2009, on which firm reliance has been placed by learned Single Judge. Even reliance has been L.P.A. No. 1128 of 2011(O&M) -2- placed on another judgment rendered by Delhi High Court in P.K.Handoo v. Estate Officer 2006(132) DLT 672. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and are of the view that the opinion expressed by the learned Single Judge does not warrant interference. The matter is squarely covered by the judgment noticed in the first para of the order. 3. The appeal does not warrant admission and is hereby dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE July 07, 2011 PARAMJIT