BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI H.C.P.(MD)No.336 of 2011 Vimala ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur, Karur District. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Chinnadharapuram Police Station, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District. 3.Veerasamy ...Respondents PRAYER: The Habeas Corpus petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Writ of Habeas Corpus by directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body of the detenue namely V.Aadhithvikas (age 4 1/2 years) and handover the custody to the petitioner and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.c.Sundaravadivel For R1 & R2 : Mr.C.Ramesh,APP For R3 : Mr.B.Jana @ Jonath Ahamed ORDER (Order of this Court was made by S.RAJESWARAN,J.) This petition has been filed by the mother to trace out her minor son Aadhithvikas aged 4 1/2 years said to be in the illegal custody of the third respondent her husband . According to her, there has been some misunderstanding between her and the third respondent husband. In this regard H.M.O.P. No. 51 of 2009 for divorce has also been filed by the 3rd respondent/husband the same is pending before the learned Principal Sub Judge, Karur. While so, on 11.12.2011 the third respondent/husband forcibly taken her minor son Aadhithvikas from her custody and since then the boy has been with the third respondent. The attempt made by her to see the child were in vain and it was thwarted by the third respondent. The complaint given to the Police was in vain. Hence, the above Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed. 2. On notice, the third respondent represented by the counsel. 3. On 13.6.2011 after hearing the petitioner, and the third respondent and seeing the reaction of the minor child who is the custody of the third respondent father, we passed an order directing the third respondent/husband to take minor child in the week end to nearby temple, So that the mother/the petitioner herein would have access to the child. That arrangement was directed to be continued in the last two Saturdays and Sundays and the matter was directed to be posted today. 4.Today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the order was not complied with by the third d t/h b d https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/