IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2010 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37196 of 2010(Y) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SIVAPRASAD.R, S/O. LATE RAVEENDRAN, AGED 42 YEARS, SIVA SADANAM, CHITTOOR, PONMANA.P.O, PIN - 691 583. (L.D. CLERK, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, ADA OFFICE, CHAVARA) BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV.MR. ANTONY MUKKATH – GOVERNMENT PLEADER. MR. ALEXANDER THOMAS – SC FOR PSC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.37196 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs: “i) To call for the records leading to Ext.P1 t P6 to issue a writ of mandamus declaring that all candidates, who secured 40% marks and above in the preliminary test are entitled to be included in the final ranked list pursuant to Ext.P1 notification. ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the interview and to include him in the final ranked list pursuant to Ext.P1 notification; iii) To direct the 2nd respondent not to publish the final ranked list pursuant to Ext.P1 till the case of the petitioner is considered and his respective rank is finalised” Admittedly, the issues involved in this writ petition are squarely covered by Ext.P6 judgment. The contention of the petitioner is that Ext.P6 judgment has not been correctly decided and requires re-consideration. It is also submitted that Ext.P6 judgment is pending in Writ Appeal. In the above circumstances, I am inclined to dismiss this writ petition following Ext.P6 judgment. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed following Ext.P6 judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd