IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. APPEAL AGAINST ORDER No. 91/2008 ( Chandrashekhar Kisan Madke ... Vs. . Saraswatibai Moreshwar Gajbhiye ) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri Rajeev Chhabra, Advocate for Appellant. Learned A.G.P. for Respondent no.1. Shri J.P. Kothari, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JULY 2, 2009. The learned Counsel for respondent no.4 states that his client has no intention of alienating or transferring the suit property during the pendency of the Suit, and hence the appeal needs to be allowed in terms of prayer clause (2) of the Appeal. The learned Counsel for the appellant agrees that the appeal may be disposed of in view of this undertaking. The Appeal is consequently disposed of. JUDGE Rgd.