3mm Eefsch IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CH HATTISGARH w.P. No.1i-104—0F 2004 Petitioner Smt. Uma Thakur (before ma/rriage, now known as Dr. {(S'mt.) Uma Paikra, aged about 35 years, W/o Dr. Rameshwar Paikra, Presently posted at Community Health Centre, Tah. Chhura, Gariaband, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus ’1. State. of Chhattisgarh, thro Respondents ugh the Secretary, Deptt. Of Health and Family Welfare, DKS Bhavan, Raipur. 2. Chief Medical Officer, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Distt. Raipur. 3. Block Medical Officer, Chhura, Tah. Gariaband, Distt. ‘Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER HBGH CGURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WP. No. 4§04 of 2064 Petitaoner Smt. Uma Thaku.’ ‘ Versua Resgoncients State ef Chhattisgarh & others 85: Hon’bie W. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J $hri Ghanshyam Patei, Advocate for the petitioner. Shrt Utk {sh Verma, Deputy Gcvt. Ad 'ocate sr the respendentsfState. O R E) E R ( Passed on this 23’” day of February. 2007) The fcttcwing Order ef the Coart is passed by Sa ish K. Agnihotrt, J. 1. The eetiticner white warking as Medtcat Cfttcer at Community Heatth Center, hura was traasferfed ta Batcctabazer, on the same terms and eenditiens Vide impugned transfer etder eated 25.1G.2GG4 (Annexure PM) within theseme disttict Raipui‘. 2. Thts Ceurt vide interim arder dated 6.1 .2005 directed that the petitioner be aiiewe te centinue, if she was net reiieved. 3. Be that as it may. with the passage cf time this petition has become infractuous as period of transfer is not appiicabie forever. At this petnt at time there is no questicn te examine the vaiidity of the transfer arder. Hewever. the respendents are at liberty ta paee appropriate erders keeping in View the pubiic interest and administrative exigeney. witheut inaisting en compiiance of the impugned traneier crder. 4. it is weii settied princieie ct law that transfer is an incident at serviee and it is fer the empieyer to decide as to where a particuiar etiicerlerneioyee be pasted keeping in View public interest as weil as administrative exigeney. This Court has iimited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere oniy in the case of proved maiatide, nan-competence of authority eassing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with t..e ruies and reguiations. i \t . in View of the above. this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. W/r l Sd/- sans}! K. Agnihou-i Judge Thak' r ‘l 7i J