IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. (St N0. S^l 72011 PBTITIONER RBSPONDENTS ^ r\V'/?^ ~1 \^y,^ ^y''^ ^'' \^x \ ..^y\ '^ /"y.e"s^ '": ^ -^. y^.], ^ ^M^y' '^ Smt. Shimla, W/o Rakesh Thakur, aged about 44 years, R/o Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) posted as Women Health Worker at Sub Health Centre, Andhiyarkhor (Nawagarh). VERSUS ^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Health and Family Welfare, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2.^ Director Health Services, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 3. ^ The Collector, Durg Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. ~ Chief Medical and Health Officer, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRnLPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA ^l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTTSOARH AT BIIASPIJR. PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5381 of2011 Smt. Shimla. RE8PONDENTS VP^SIJS 8tM.e ofChhattisgarh & CXhers. WRIT PEITHON UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF T3 CONSTnuriON OF INT)IA SB: Hon»WeShri Satish K. Agniliotri, J. Present: Shri B.P.Singh, Advocate fbrthe petitioner Sfari SIiashaiik Tlialcur, Panel Lawyer for tl'ie Slale/respoiid^iils. ORD'KR (P^sed on 12th~^iy-ofSeptember, 2011) 1, Chaileiige in this pet.it.ion is to tiie order dated 15.07,2011 (.Aimexiire P/l) whereby the petitio3ie<r, working as Female Hea-ith Worker at Sub Health Centre, AiidhiyarJdior, Nawa-gark has beeii tramferred to Sub Health Centre, Khadbattar, Dosidilohara, on a.dmmistrative groimds, 2< Leamed coimsel a.ppea.rmg fix the petitioBer sybmits ynder fhe policy dated 13.066011, it is deariy the Collect.or alosie is competeiit t.o traiisfer the empioyees belozigmg t.o class III and class IV sen/ices^ osi proposal b5/r Ae m a.pprova-1 ofthe mimsA.er-in-charge. 3. IB the ca.se on hand, it appears that. the Chief Meeiical & Heatt-h Officen Di^rg, withoirt following the giiidelmes issiied iii the traasfer policy, has passed the impisgoed orden when the Coilect.or lias been assigned the responsibiiity oftransfer ofthe employee working m the concemed district, o.n proposal of llie cosicemed depa.rtment.s, Thiis, this sisffers from tfae defect of competence of th^ officer. Accordmgly, the tra.iisfer m m the @yes of law. 4. As a. resiilt, the transfer order clated 15.07.2011 (Armexiire P/l) in •respect ofthe petitioner, is qiiashed, HOW@VCT, liberty is reser^ed to the Govermnent to pass a.ppropriate order, if so a-dvi8e<i iii a.ccorda.nce with law, m a.dmmistrative exigency a.nd m p'ablic intCTest, 5. Accordmgly, the writ petition m allowed to the a-bove ext.ent. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge