*1* wp.3511.11.933.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3511 OF 2011 Ravi Ramesh Raman. ..Petitioner -Versus- State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents .......... Mr.Pankaj C. Kansara, for the Petitioner. Ms.P.S.Cardozo, AGP, for the Respondents/State. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 21st June, 2011. P.C.: 1 The Petitioner is aggrieved by the communication refusing to pass any order on the application made for entering the name of the person as Manager in compliance with Rules 8(1) and 8(2) of the Rules for Keeping Place for Public Entertainment Rules, 1953. It is contended that not only communication is issued, but the Petitioner apprehends that the proceedings will be initiated for non-compliance of these Rules. 2 After the matter was argued for some time, the learned AGP, on instructions, makes a statement that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the authorities to take such action as permissible in law, they will communicate to the Petitioner within a period of two months from today, their concurrence to insert and enter the name of person, namely, Mr.Dayanand B. Shetty in the licence and issue the relevant certificate/Nokarnama in his name. 3 In the light of this statement, nothing survives in this petition and it is, accordingly, disposed of. The Respondents to abide by the *2* wp.3511.11.933.sxw statement made above and take the afore-stated steps within two months from today. 4 The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that in order to assist the authorities, the Petitioner will provide the details of the person whose name has to be entered, including any identification proof, if necessary. 5 The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)