^) •^i C f- i^~Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W.P. fO No. .r^ OF 2007 PETITIONER: •-t' ^.Vinod Kumar Soni, aged 54 years, son of ofe a^"" Shri Ramcharan Soni, resident of Sunaliya \ryv ^^^~ ^e ^ ^ jewelers, power house road, Korba, tehsil -'..^^^ ;•-„,:,-"'^'' ^s\^°" '"^" RESPONDENTS: ..o^ & district - Korba (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS ^l-) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department ofRevenue, Raipur, P-) District Collector, Korba (C. G.), IVIunicipal Corporation, Korba, through the Commissioner (Municipal Corporation) Korba (C.G.), /4) Tehsildar, Korbatehsil, Korba, (C.G.). s-^ ^J?^ ^^ , ,^aT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22^ OF ^^. ^O' THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR c^ ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER, DIRECTION. ~l——3-^x^Libmit as XI-HC-22 3^?T^T fN^^n^r 5h^[ch^TfN' Raju (,<^.\(v \'A 3^ ^l^ld^, ^Tfl^Ko, ^<ni<r1^< 3<1^1 451<sr» _ , • ^o.~}l5 /o~~j- ..^..4.^.V^..-...-^ j^QQ 1 ^ll^c-ll $h^l<t> f^s 3Ti^T?^<TT^K^f?cT coMnsel fil^d Shri^omnath Verma,' Shri Surrsit Verma, Panel Heard. Respondent No.4 has initN] for removal of encroachment ciaimina the iand hls own has fil^d respondents not to dispossess l^in land In dispyte. Apparentiy It Is a tltle prove his tltie jn the competent remedy avallabie for restralnsrtig Injunctlon by tiiing 'a civil suit in nnatter relates to factuai alternative efficaclous remedyl Therefore, ! am not incllned Constitution of india to Interferel the Revenue Coyrt. HoweverJ learned civil Court wiii dedde Wjth the aforesaid. direl Consequently, rVi.VV.,P.?Mo.115.; disposed of, Certified copy as per rules,| for the petitloner. L(a^wer tor the State. initlated |ated proceedina agalnst tne petjtioner jmade by the petltioner. Petltjoner the instant petition for a directlon to frorn hss house and shop over the Gbi<4fcn41ri ^i^QiT^:tel:^t'<Ri^i< ^"3^T3TI^T trte nim djspjute and tne petitioner has a burden to cburt of jurisaiction. He has alternatlve the respondents by appropfjate cornpetent court ofjurisdlction. The adluldlcation as weil as petjtioner nas avaliabje with other junsdiction, step in under Artjcle 226 of She |wlth the proceedings pending before if the petitloner files a civil suit. the ^r as eariy as possiDie. ?N:ion, this petltion is disposed of» .2Q07 and I.A.No.361/2007 also stand tb the Imatter 2Q07 Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (lft^^Ra^l)