IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.141 of 2010 Date of decision: 4.2.2010 Naresh Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mrs. Neena Madan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. **** HARBANS LAL, J. (ORAL) The Warrant Officer, in his report has mentioned that “all the alleged detenues (as identified by the petitioner), were found working near there hutments. Respondent No. 4 Janak Tyagi @ Bunty was present in the office of the brick-kiln, situated near the hutments. He, after accepting notices, very fairly stated that everyone at the brick- kiln is free to go anywhere and there are no restrictions. On hearing this, the petitioner after stating that they are going to their native village in U.P., left the place alongwith all the alleged detenues, within my sight, to which also there was not opposition. In compliance with the directions issued in Criminal Writ Petition No.342 of 2008 to give a specific report, it may be observed that in the instant case, the stay of the alleged detenues at the brick-kiln, particularly at the time of my visit, could not be termed in any manner as 'illegal detention'.” In view of this report no further action is required. Disposed of accordingly. February 4, 2010 (HARBANS LAL) rishu JUDGE