yp ^ ^ IN THE HZGH COURT OP OiHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETI030N N0. ^1'7 5/03 / PETITIONER .^^' ^ ^iA^l^ RamratQnMandle S/o» Late Ram Singh Mandle, aged about 40 years, R/Oo Vill. Mundara^ P.0. Rahud, P.S, Ranchirai^ Tah, Gunderdehi^ Distt^ Durg (C«G,), '^^' •••' VERSUS It^ RSSPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary G'eneral Administratiai^ Department D<K,S, Bhawan^ Raipur (C<iG»)o 2o Superitendent Late Chandulal Chandakar^ Mini Industrial Training Institute/ Bemetara, Distt, Durg (C«G<)» 3* Colleator/ Durg Distt^ Durg (C.G^). PETICTQN UNDBR ^RTICLB 226 t&c 227 Op TH2 CONS1ITUTION OF INDIA. u XI-HC-22 ^? T<ll^l<rt<Li, ^^4i<o, ^l^3< T ^ 3T?^T^T f^TW^TS^r ^RW TI^? ^^ ^ 3TT^T 'CTSR? 'Wfl^T IFWSF*""*"*"'""^"'"*'*" ' ^FI 2( 3 I^R^T' ^?T??T ^RTTW ^if^ci 12.4.2004 Smt Mee.ua Shastri, Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal coliinsel Heaixl, petlt^ner Counsel for tlie appoiDted as watchinaa ia pet.it.ioner is that his ser^j 02.12,1999 (Annexm-e P-3) without foUowiB.g t.he iiorms|, •Jayaiiti Swa Rojgar Yojaiia is| taken 011 duty, but it could szibm.its that Swani JaYaiitil aiid the petidoner Biade rep| has iiot been decided tiU datel. submits ttiat the petitioner was tlie yeai' 1997. The grievaiice of the lice has been teiininated vide order ^ithout giving opportuniUr of heailug aiid Smt,Shastri. coiitends tiiat if SwaiT^- started then one week before he m.ay be 1 not be done, Leai^ied couusel further Swa- Rojgar Yojaiia has'been restaited )|resentation vide Aiinexure P-11, which Havio.g heaixl, and w nierits of the case, ui the sexved if a direction is representation raising his of tlie respondents aloiig within 15 days, aiid on conipetent autliority of the own ine.xits in accordance ^ early as possible preferably) receipt of tlie representationj. still reniahis, the petitioner of. Witli -tlie aforesaid ob^ C-.C. as per rule.s. ^s^I<n«Iivi1RT1R^f ^ fe^ ^^K '^a^m^?i for ihe petitioner, Paael Lowyer on advance copy. optpion giveti g4evaaces willii |thout expressiiig any opinioii 011 tlie of this Court, ends ofjustice will be to the petitioner to make a detailed before tlie competent authority a copy of tlie. petition aad tliis 'order, ! such representation beiiig filed, tlie ^spondeiits shall decide the saine on its ^7iih law by passnig reasoned.order as witlim. Uvo iiionths froxn the date of [t; is made clear that if aiiy grievance avail the re.medv under tlie law. l^S lUav -rvatbus, tliis petition staiid.s disposecl Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [''^"^fer^