IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2008 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7293 of 2008(R) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. M.DAKSHAYANI, W/O.LATE MADATHIL BHASKARAN, SUJATHA NILAYAM, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI (VIA), KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. M.SURESAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.LATE MADATHIL BHASKARAN, SUJATHA NILAYAM, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI (VIA), KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. M.SUDHARMANI, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O.W/O.BHAGYANATH, BHAGYA SUDHA, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI-673 611, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. M.SUJATHA, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.RAJAN.T.K., THEKKEKEEZHEDATH VEEDU, CHERUKULATHOOR P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. M.PRASEEDA, W/O.HEMANTHAN, AGED 31 YEARS, MADATHIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI-673 611, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. K.HEMANTHAN, MADATHIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI-673 611, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI SMT.C.G.PREETHA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WPC 7293/08 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE -673 020. 3. THE SECRETARY, KAKKODY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KAKKODI, KOZHIKODE. 4. THAIKANDIYIL GOPALAN, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI (VIA), KOZHIKODE- 673 611. 5. SUNITHA, W/O.THAIKANDIYIL GOPALAN, KIZHAKKUMMURI P.O., KAKKODI (VIA), KOZHIKODE-673 611. R1-R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 7293 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 3rd March, 2008 JUDGMENT I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. But complaining that respondents 4 and 5 have put up certain constructions encroaching into petitioners property and that the third respondent has assigned door number to such unauthorised constructions, the petitioners have submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 2nd respondent. Since Ext.P3 is apparently pending before the 2nd respondent, it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent takes a decision on Ext.P3. I therefore dispose of the Writ Petition issuing the following directions: The 2nd respondent is directed to take up Ext.P3 immediately, issue notice to the 2nd petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 and also to the third respondent, the Secretary of the Panchayat and then take a decision on Ext.P3 in the light of the various grounds raised in the Writ Petition. Hearing as directed above will be conducted and decision will be taken by the 2nd respondent at the earliest and at any rate within six weeks of the petitioners producing copy of this judgment together with a copy of the Writ Petition and all the exhibits. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE W.P.C.No. - 2 -