1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1136 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1254 OF 1995 Punjabai Hona Javare and another ..APPLICANTS -VERSUS- Babu Samser Tadvi Since deceased, by his heirs 1A. Smt.Begambai Bau Tadvi and others ..RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel for applicants. ..... CORAM : R.M.BORDE,J DATE : 27th August, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. V.J. Dixit, learned Senior Counsel appearing for applicants. None appears for respondents, though served. 2. It is pointed out that the Additional Commissioner exercised the revisional powers suo-moto and directed issuance of notices on 10.06.1993. After lapse of about 17 years and after the death of respondent no.1, proceedings were conducted before the Additional Commissioner. The decision rendered by the 2 Additional Commissioner is rendered 17 years after his death. The respondent no.1 was benefited by decision rendered in the matter, which was admittedly against dead person. In such circumstances, the present application is required to be allowed and the delay occurred is liable to be condoned. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed and same is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause `A'. 3. Civil application disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE gas/ca1136.04