IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 612 of 2008 Date of Decision: January 16, 2008 Pardeep Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. M.M. KUMAR, J. Notice of motion. Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is called for final disposal. The claim made by the petitioner in the instant petition is that he has completed the work allocated to him by the Municipal Council, Gurdaspur-respondent No. 3, however, the payment in respect of the work done has not been made. The petitioner has also asserted that for the recovery of the payment a legal notice has also C.W.P. No. 612 of 2008 been served on the respondents through his counsel on 19.9.2007 (P-4). Without going into the controversy and expressing any opinion on merit, we deem it just and appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing respondent No. 3 to take cognisance of the legal notice and pass detailed reasoned order thereon. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (T.P.S. MANN) January 16, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2