IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2007 / 18TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 298 of 2007(I) ------------------------ PETITIONERS: ----------------- 1. SUGUNA. A., ASSISTANT TEACHER, A.M.M.U.P. SCHOOL, VADAVANNUR, KOLLENGODE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. PREMALATHA, UPSA, K.S.B. SCHOOL, KOORIPPODE, KOLLENGODE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR SRI.GEEN T.MATHEW RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PLUBLIC INSTSRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.298 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P11. I feel that the petitioner has an alternate remedy under Rule 92 of Chapter XIVA KER. In such circumstances petitioners should be relegated to the pursuit of alternate remedy under Rule 92. Accordingly, if the petitioner files a revision under Rule 92 within three weeks from today, the first respondent will consider the same and take a decision thereon in accordance with law after hearing the petitioners and any other affected party within a further period of six weeks from the date of filing of the revision. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.