1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6637 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 869 OF 2006 Rajaram Bapu Kumatrar and others .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for Applicants. The Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent/State. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6639 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 873 OF 2006 Kashinath Ramkrishna Peche .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for Applicants. The Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent/State. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6638 OF 2010 2 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 872 OF 2006 Janardhan Ramkrishna Peche and another.. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for Applicants. The Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : . These are the civil applications filed by the original claimants for directions against the respondent/State for depositing the entire amount under the award. Initially this Court after hearing the parties granted stay in favour of the State on condition that the State deposits 50% of the amount. Accordingly, the State complied with the said order and the present applicants have also withdrawn the said amount. 2. Shri Jaybhar, learned counsel for the applicants states, it will take time for deciding the appeals and as such, the State be 3 directed to deposit the entire amount. This cannot be the ground for directing the State to deposit the entire amount, as earlier while granting the stay the present applicants were also heard. In the light of the same, the applications are rejected. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Sept. 10