IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9329 of 2008 Between: Smt. Y. Aruna, W/o. Y Vijaya Kumar, R/o. Bendepudi - Village, Tondangi Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District. 3 The Tahsildar, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ one in the nature or Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent Tahsildar, Kakinada (Urban), East Godavari District in not conducting the Survey and demarcating the lands in an extent of Ac. 2-67 cents in Survey No. 144/2 of Ramanayyapet, Kakinada (Urban), East Godavari District, as being arbitrary and illegal violative of Article 14 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith conduct the survey and demarcate the lands belonging to the petitioner in an extent of Ac. 2-67 cents in Survey No. 144/2 of Ramanayyapet, Kakinada (Urban), East Godavari District, and issue such other writ or order or direction Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondents No: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 9329 of 2008 Order: It is the case of the petitioner that she made a representation dated 28.02.2008 to the 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District, seeking to survey and demarcate the lands belonging to her in survey No.144/2 of Ramanayyapet, Kakinada (Urban) Mandal, East Godavari District, by paying necessary fees to enable her to install fencing all around the land admeasuring Ac.2.60 cents to avoid illegal encroachments, but till date no action thereon has been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions. The 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 28.2.2008, said to have been made by the petitioner seeking to survey and demarcate the lands in question, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA,J Date: 25.4.2008 Ksr/Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District. 3 The Tahsildar, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District. 4 2CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd (OUT) 5 2CD copies