IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 288 of 2011 Decided on: 5.8.2011 Savitri Devi …Petitioner Versus S. K Baldi …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No. For the petitioner : Mr. V.D Khidta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. R.P Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ______________________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma.J (Oral) : The Court has directed the respondents to re-do the entire selection process by considering the petitioner as well as Rajpal. LPA has been preferred by Rajpal bearing No. 111 of 2011. Learned Division Bench of this Court has deferred the selection of part time water carrier till the time of possibility of adjusting the appellant. LPA No. 111 of 2011 is pending. In view of this, present COPC has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as having 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? become infructuous. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to approach this Court subject to the outcome of the LPA. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 5, 2011 (priti)