IIBLE BE! J. o .^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. No. 2-^T73 / 2006 PETITIONER /v* \°U5^^/ {b>-^" ..•••" , ^^-" / ^?^^/ A. <• ••"'...^-^ '>_>•' ,ff'm.y / VERSUS B.P. Tiwari, S/o - Shri Maniram Tiwari, Aged about - 59 years, Sub - Engineer, Survey Water Resources Departanaent, Sub-Division - Bilaspur, (C.G.) Establishment Under Kharang - Water Resources Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS l-d^^^s/ c^2!.r?5£^ / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. Dy. Seeretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Water Resources Department, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Engineer In Chief, Water Resources Department, District Raipur (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 T5T ^|<(|ciq, (Si'rfld'IS, fs|dltili< til^dl sh^li* •'^3.^.fc£l,..^.^^>^200 £ 311^1 •4ach (yit^q^iT) a-n^T^rR-fitb (rarsTi^Tshtii'* 17-7-2DflfiB^ireTirfNsn^T Shri Y.C. Sharma, counsei fof Shri Sumesh Bajaj respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant petition, the dated 4-7-2006 whereby the petit|i Resources Department, Sub Divisif: Jashpur. The main grievance raised that he is aged more than 59 years months he is going to attain the[ Government Policy, fhe pension papl' therefore.he ought not to have beer) In the circumstances, learneitl that the petitioner may be al'ow^ respondent No.1 and he be directecj eounsel for respondents has no obj^! Having heard tearned couns^ facts and circumstances of the cas^ on the merit of the case, the peti| representation along Vi?ith copy of thj period of 1 Q days from today and i| the representation of the petitioner| date of receipt of the representa{ considering afl the points raised by t|i the petitioner. Govtmment Advocate for the State/ ^rafa^r WRcft'ff f&^-rfSRzrc ^srl^iTsn^T petitioner has challenged the order oner, who is working in the VA/ater }n Bilaspur, has been transferred to y the petitioner in this writ petition is and as per the rulss within a period of age of superannuation. As per the ers of fhe petitioner are being moved, counsel for the petitioner submitted ^j to make a representation to the to decide the same to which learned tetion. [I for the parties, having regard to the |, and without expressing any opinion iEioner is allowed to make a detaited js petition to respondent No.1 within a ih turn, respondent No.1 shall decide Iwithin a period of 30 days from the i(:ion, in an objective manner, after jie petitioner, in accordance with law. XI-HC-78 's^ "Mi^K'fi, «Tnu'is,Riciiuy +11*1WI S»i*1ich W[ 200 Sii^o 4si<*> ('ictl^'st<<er) sf^ w R-)i+ (raT3fi^rs»»iiti ?¥(ITWflfN sn^r ^- °hi<ifci41-i HiiMTffteI^<Ri«i< ^3Tf^T3lI^T dn Tii! then, effect and operati stayed and the petitioner shouid relieved. With the direction aforesaid, Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.: Parties are entitisd for certifi4d of the order impugned shal! remain i|iot be relieved if he has already not ;he petition stands 363/2006 ateo copy of this disposed of. disposed of. Barve Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge