IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6147 of 2011(P) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- K.GEETHA, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, 'SMITHASREE', EVOOR.P.O., MUTTOM, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT WORKING AS INSTRUCTRESS GRADE-II AT PEERMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.6147 Of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-consideration of objection with regard to the draft list showing the transferee stations published as per Exhibit P4. 2. The petitioner is working in Peermedu from 2008 onwards as evident from Exhibit P2 order. It is pointed out that the same is a hilly area and on completion of two years, such a person is entitled to get a transfer to another place, which is not a hilly place. The petitioner is due to retire on 31.3.2013 and showing the choice of the stations, the petitioner submitted Exhibit P3 application. It is pointed out that in Exhibit P4 provisional transfer list, the petitioner's name has not been included. In these circumstances, the petitioner has filed Exhibit P5 objection to the same. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the authority concerned to consider Exhibit P5 before finalising Exhibit P4 provisional list. 3. The learned Government Pleader submitted that since in Exhibit P4 itself it is stated that complaints, if any, against the W.P.(C)No.6147/11 -2- provisional list should reach the office on or before 26.2.2011 and therefore evidently, the final list will have to be published after considering the various objections to the same. 4. There will be a direction to the respondents to consider the objection Exhibit P5, if the same has been received within time, before finalising Exhibit P4 provisional list. The petitioner will produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) Issue copy today itself dsn True copy P.A.to Judge