m arré‘aW (W?) mmagaanéa SB: Hon’ble Shri ManiaMx a Mohan Shrivastava J. 04.03.2010» , counsel for the petitioner. Lawver for the State. Petitioner’s grievance petitioner has been workil 1984. Accerding to the pe’ consi(iered for promotion tc his case for promotion oug has also beexi submitted tl'. View of Circular dated Government, his case for g been considered which has mm#wm $Wanéa Shri Rak6sh Anthem Shn' Ajit Singh, Panei In the re‘mm filed b that fhe case of the petitim with the rules and vide mel has been ihformeti to the D of the rant of scale promotion ought to have not been done. y the respondents, it has been stated 1er would be considered in accordance no dated 16. 12.1999 (Annexure R-7), it rector, Technical Education that so far no person junior to the petitioner has been promoted. The said memo further states that ' so far as petitioner’s claim for grant of scale promotion is concerné , the same is under consideration. In this View of the atter, in my opinion, ends of justice would be served in dispos' g of the petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of scale mat-n eitn'as ....w..f.[.5.2...§.l§.5.7lo§ mac Ventilated to this petition is that the Lg as Lab Attendant since 17th August itioner as he became eligible for being the next higher post of Lab Technician, ht to be taken up for consideration. It .at even if promotions are not made, in 17.3.1999 (Annexure A—6) Xl-HC-78 W matmm Elanmam m §qi$ “a 20 anésr m (W) Rena-{mama promotion in accoldance 17.3. 1999 promoticn in the event he promotion on the mma'wm r 2w asWmeT I1€X1 with the Government Circular dated (Annexure A—E) and grant him benefits of scale has not. been granted benefit of regular higher in the case of the petitioner, if not aiready decided, within a ,\\_k”i pOSt of Lab Technician. RespondentlDirector, Technical Education, Chhattisgarh shall take appropriate decision period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Needless to emphasise, if the grievance still subsists, it will be open to the petitioner to approach the Court again. With the aforesaid d:rection, the petition is finally disposed of. r Sd/— ‘ “‘Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge