IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.8502 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2011 Sunil Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Davinder Kumar and others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.R.S. Madan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Kshetarpal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The tenant is in revision against the orders of both the Courts below by which he was ordered to vacate the demised premises. The landlord filed a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 (for short ‘the Act’), inter alia, on the grounds of non-payment of rent, bana fide necessity and cease to occupy. Both the Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the tenant has ceased to occupy the demised premises for over a period of four months before filing of the eviction petition without any reasonable cause. Without referring to other ground of eviction, the learned counsel for the petitioner was asked by this Court to assail the finding of the learned Courts below on the issue of cease to occupy in which he has miserably failed as the landlord has brought voluminous evidence on record in this regard. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the revision petition and as such the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 27, 2011 JUDGE Vivek