IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 14180 of 2000 Between: C.M.Anwar, S/o. C.Ghouse Peer, Kadiripalya Street, Sidlaghatta Village, Kolar District, Karnataka State. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The union of India, Rep. by its General Manager, South Central Railways, Secunderabad. 2 The Registrar, Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order or orders, direct or directions, writ or writs particularly one in nature of "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" and declare the action of the 1st Respondent in not depositing the amount as per the Judgment and Decree in O.A.A.No.6 of 1995, dt. 19-12-1995, which was conﬁrmed in C.M.A.No.421 of 1996, dt. 2-12-1999, is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to pay the remaining half of the decretal amount as per the Decree and Judgment in O.A.A.No.6 of 1995, dt. 19-12-1995, which was conﬁrmed by this Hon'ble Court in C.M.A.No.421 of 1996, dt. 2-12-1999 with interest and to pass such other orders as are necessary in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.L.N.SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.R.ASHOK (SC FOR RAILWAYS) The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: None appears. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner was not present nor was there any representation on his behalf on 27-08-2008, writ petition is posted ‘for dismissal’ today. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________ 28th August, 2008 SKM