IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1K Hafpal Singh S/o. Karnail Singh aged 45 years, C/o. Rachr Bombay Road Ways, Ratu Road, Thana Sukhdeo Nagar Ranchi (Jharkand) NON — APPLICANTS 2. Tej singh’S/o. Rajendra Singh Occupation — iver, aged 4O years, C/o. Ranchi Bombay Road Ways, Ratu Road.,Thana Sukhdeo Nagar, Ranchi (Jharkand) ‘3. The‘United India Insurance I Company Ltd. White House Road Madras, Divisional Office, Khachari Road Raipur' (C.G.) 4. Sultan Ahmed S/o. Kamaluddin R/o. Maudapara Raipur (C.G.) 5. The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Urla Road Raipur. CG.) ENHANCEMENT OF'AWARD AMOUNT PASSED IN M.A.C.C. NO. 7/92 BY M.A.C.T. SAKTI. DISTT. JANJGLR— CHAMPA (CG) ON 30/04/2002 / CLAIM BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL Rs. 8 85 000/;7 CLAIM AW ED Rs. 1.06.000/4‘” CLAIM 1N APPEAL Rs. 2.64.000/- I M.A. é; 1? /2002 APPELLANT 1. Nembai W/o. Dhansai aged 40 APPLICANTS years 5 g 2. Chandram. S/o. Dhansai aged 21 1’ years 4 3. Dhawaja Bai D/o‘ Dhansai aged 15 years 4. Minor Chandra Prakesh S/o. / Dhansai aged 17 years O 3" .« J’M o No. 4 Through guardian mother. ”‘x& ’v..-'\ é; ...-.k Nembai W/o. Dhansai R/o. K w‘l'M Village Chhawari Bhata Police y“a eorgirw‘ rUb- “will Q.j Station Chandrapur, Tahsil Dabra, Distt. Janjgir Champa(C.G.) v _ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR LL_OK ADALAT) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.‘ 627 of 2002 AppeHants : Nembai & others Versus Respondents: Harpal Singh & others (Eising out of Claim Case No. 7 of 1992) 01.01.2007 w Shri Roshan Dubey, counsel for the appellants. None for respondents No. 1. 2, 4 & 5. ' Shri JN Mandat, Brangh Manager, United lndia Insurance Company Limited with Shri JK Gupta, counsel for respondent No.3. ln terms of compromise, award is passed as below:- 1) in addition to compensation already awarded by the Tribunal, respondent‘No3 shall pay Rs.60.0001— (Rupees sixty thousand only) to the appellants. 2) For disbursement and deposit in FDR, the direction and ratio adopted by the Tribunal, if any, shail toliow. 3) The amount, if any, kept in deposit with Bank shall be payable under the orders of Tribunal in accordance with law. Appellants shall be entitled to receive interest on the amount so deposited, if any. .5) in view of the above, appeal against respondents No.1, 2, 4 & 5 stands dismissed. 6) Out of the above amount, Rs.600/- (Rupees six hundred only) shail be paid to counsel for the appellants directly by the insurance Company towards counsel fee. lf the amount awarded is not deposited within a period of one month, the insurance Company shaii be liable to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum thereafter. 8) Copy of the aufrg/Shaii be given to the parties free of cost. e 5d,- I x Sd/_ i ”if Justice V.K. Shrivastava ' Member_LokAdalat i i H.1gb Member‘LOk Court of Chhattisgarh Ada!“ High Courtor Bilas Chhattisgarh‘ m. ‘ Bilaspur p padma