IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34683 of 2009 1. KAMAL DEO RAI, SON OF RAM PRAKASH RAI 2. RAVINDRA KUMAR RAI @ RAVINDRA KUMAR @ BARINDRA KUMAR, SON OF SATTAN RAI 3. MAHESH RAI, SON OF KAPLIDEO RAI ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHORA TABHKA, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. ----- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 13.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners’ role in the entire occurrence is very limited inasmuch as they are the persons who gave assurance to the complainant that Chandra Kala Devi and Subodh Mahto are reliable businessmen as a result of which the complaint sold 5 quintals turmeric worth Rs. 20,000/- and 4 quintal chilly worth Rs. 20,000/-. It is alleged that only 15,000/- has been returned to the complainant. Be that as it may, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Complaint Case C.R. No. 905 of 2008, on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, District Samastipur subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)