-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.811 OF 2004 Smt.Kamladevi wd/o Freedom Fighter Chandiram Somai ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & others ...Respondents .... Mr.Uday Sankar Samudrala, Advocate for Petitioner Mr.I.S.Thakur, A.P.P. for the State Mr.A.M.Saraogi Advocate for Respondent no.8 .... CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : H.L.GOKHALE AND H.L.GOKHALE AND H.L.GOKHALE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 16,2004 : AUGUST 16,2004 : AUGUST 16,2004 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.Samudrala for the Petitioner. Mr.Thakur appears for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7 and Mr.Saraogi appears for the Respondent No.8. There appears to be a dispute between the petitioner who is the mother of Respondent No.8 and himself. Probably at the instance of the other sons of the petitioner, she has involved the Respondent No.8 on the ground that for liquor licence which is issued to Respondent no.8, he has not given the correct address. An affidavit has been filed by the Deputy Superintendent of State Excise Department which states that proper inquiries have been made and thereafter, the licence has been issued on the address given by the Respondent No.8. -2- Mr.Saraogi states that premises of which address is given for the licence, are still under the control of Respondent No.8. There is no reason to interfere with the said licence. Petition is dismissed. [ H.L.GOKHALE,J. ] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]