KPP -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3427 OF 2011 Gajanan Shikshan Sanstha, Anur ... Appellant vs. Appaso Daulu Khede and others ..Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar, instructed by Mr. Tanaji Mhatugade, for the appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: JULY 25, 2011. P.C. The learned single Judge by cogent reasons has found that the appellant has not given explanation for inordinate delay in filing the appeal before the Joint Charity Commissioner even after he had received the certified copy of the order passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner. The discretionary order passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, which is confirmed in writ petition, in our view, is not required to be interfered with in this Letters Patent Appeal. Mr. Anturkar, learned counsel for the appellant, tried to argue that the appellant has never applied for certified copy of the order and somebody else has applied for the same for which he has relied upon the earlier order passed in earlier writ petition. No such argument was canvassed at KPP -2- all before the learned single Judge and for the first time this point has been raised before us. The matter was argued only on merits about non-condonation of delay. We, therefore, do not find any illegality of the order passed by the learned single Judge. Hence the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.