IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. £2W7P0F 2011. VERSUS / RESPONDENTS : 1. f mw mm @ State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Forest Department D.K’.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Chief Conservator of forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) /"" 3. Conservator of forest, Jagdalpur, District Bastar at Jagclalpur (C.G.) I , 4. Divisional Forest Officer, Sukma, District Dantewada (0G,) $4 g/M WRIT PETITION UEDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER Y/amuna Prasad Joshi, J‘ Wu S/o. Shri A. P. Joshi, aged about \MX e 46 years, Lower Division Clerk, KKVQ 4/5,“ Forest Division Sukma, District ‘0%§§‘€\V; Dantewada (C.G.) $e-‘18’bv‘\ \W ‘ Gowri HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench z Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner‘ Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. Present :- ORDER (Passed on this 19‘ day of October‘ 2011) Heard leaF’ned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner, working as Lower Division Clerk, has been transferred from Forest Division Sukma to Forest Division Jagdalpur, on his own request. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new place of posting. Shri Verma further submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the Government to ensure that it is complied with immediately. He relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State of Assam & others’, in support of his contention that if the order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that that if the transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/1) is still in existence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. lf the aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, the Government is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. lt is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, within a period of two weeks. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. ...’-/,—" Sdl- sATisH K. ANGNEORI 1 (1 996) 10 SCC 567 Judge f WRIT PET!TION (S) NO.6247 OF 2011 PETITIONER Yamuna Prasad Joshi Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Oihers