IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 15TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24211 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- KARTHIKA VENUGOPALAN,SOUMYA,ADIYAT LANE, POOTHOLE,THRISSUR-680004. BY ADV. SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SRI.R.MANIKANTAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.24211/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARKLIST OF THE PETITIONRE. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20.8.11 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 20.8.11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 24211 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a B.Tech student. When the result of the VIIIth Semester examination was declared, she had failed in one paper viz., Image Processing”. She applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp