(-1-) hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3198 OF 2007 ProactiveIn In and Out Advertising Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. A.M. Sarogi for Petitioner. Mr. V.P. Malwankar, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. Mr. J.E. Reddy i/by Jaydeep for R. No. 2. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT,JJ. R.M. SAVANT,JJ. R.M. SAVANT,JJ. DATED: APRIL 30, 2007 DATED: APRIL 30, 2007 DATED: APRIL 30, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Petitioner was awarded a contract. In terms of that contract, the Petitioner was to construct 305 new bus stops. The case of the Petitioner is that he is entitled to construct 307 + 118 bus shelters. The case of the respondents is that the Petitioner has constructed 360 bus shelters. In other words, more than the work order issued. The Respondents thereafter had invited tenders by tender notice dated 22.7.2006 for 180 bus shelters. The offers were received. One Ronak Advertising has been allotted the tender being the successful bidder. He has been issued work order and has already commenced work thereon. (-2-) . In these circumstances, we do not find any reason to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Petition rejected. (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (R.M. SAVANT,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)