THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.14335 of 2011 O R D E R: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The petitioner is a Deputy Inspector of Schools (Urdu), Range, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. He was given full additional charge of Mandal Educational Officer by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 17.06.2009. Thereafter, the 2nd respondent considered the name of the 6th respondent herein at the request of the District Educational Officer for keeping him as Full Additional Charge of the Mandal Educational Officer by order dated 02.04.2011. The said order was questioned by the petitioner before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.2110 of 2011. The O.A. was dismissed on 19.04.2011. Challenging the same, the present writ petition is filed. Admittedly, the 6th respondent is working as Head Master. As per the proceedings issued by the Commissioner and Director of School Education, Hyderabad dated 10.02.2003 vide proceedings No.61/C3-1/2003 informing all the District Educational Officers in the State that if the post of Mandal Educational Officer/Deputy Inspector of Schools has fallen vacant, any Headmaster of Government/Zilla Parishad High School shall be kept in full additional charge and if no Head Master is available, the senior most School Assistant of Government/Zilla Parishad/Mandal Parishad Institution of that Mandal may be kept in charge of the post of Mandal Educational Officer/Deputy Inspector of Schools, and further proceedings, dated 29.09.2009 issued by the Commissioner and Director of School Education informing all the Regional Joint Directors and District Educational Officers to keep the senior most Head Master in the Mandal as in charge Mandal Educational Officer, instead of any headmaster, as instructed in the previous proceedings, dated 10.02.2003, the 6th respondent was kept in full additional charge of the post of Mandal Educational Officer. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the earlier incharge arrangements made are contrary to the instructions issued by the Commissioner and the 6th respondent was rightly kept in full additional charge of Mandal Educational Officer. Further, the petitioner has not challenged the aforesaid proceedings of the Commissioner, dated 10.02.2003 and 29.09.2009. Therefore, it cannot be said that the impugned order suffers from any illegality and we do not see any grounds to interfere with the said order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ____________________ (V.ESWARAIAH, J) Date: 18.05.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.14335 of 2011 Date: 18.05.2011 JSU