IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No. 760 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.08.2011 Veer Singh and Ors. ..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. R.S. Bains, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Brar, AAG, Punjab. **** SABINA, J. The petitioners were convicted and sentenced for an offence under Sections 323, 452, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Vide judgment and order dated 17.09.2007 Aggrieved by the said judgment/order of conviction and sentence petitioners preferred an appeal. The appellate Court vide judgment dated 31.10.2009 ordered that the petitioners be released on probation. Hence, the present petition filed by the accused. Heard. A perusal of the judgment passed by the appellate Court reveals that the counsel for the petitioners had not argued the appeal on merits but had prayed that the petitioners be released on probation and the said request of the counsel for the petitioners was accepted by the appellate Court. In these circumstances, the petitioners cannot be said to be left with any grievance. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. (SABINA) 04.08.2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)