Civil Revision No.2494 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.2494 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 18, 2011 Ashish Ghosh and another .....Petitioners v. Deepak Puri and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mrs.Ekta Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) C.M.No.9998-CII of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Civil Revision No.2494 of 2011 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 22.3.2011, Annexure A-3, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh, (hereinafter to be referred as `the Tribunal') vide which request of petitioners for premature release of Fixed Deposit Receipts (hereinafter to be referred as `FDR') regarding compensation of their share received by them in claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, on account of death of their father in the accident, was dismissed by learned Tribunal. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Tribunal. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are major and educated and they want to open a Kriyana shop to earn livelihood by investing the amount of FDR so that day-to-day expenses of family could be met, as there is no income of the petitioners Civil Revision No.2494 of 2011 (O&M) -2- after the death of their father. Hence, in view of these facts, present revision petition is accepted. Impugned order passed by learned Tribunal is set aside. Learned Tribunal is directed to order for premature release of the FDR in the name of petitioners in their favour alongwith up-to-date interest as per their respective share on proper receipt and identification. Disposed of accordingly. 18.4.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge