IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12336 of 2005 UMESH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 17.5.2010. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State appears and with reference to the statement in the counter affidavit filed on 5.5.2010, submits that the entire admissible post retiral dues to which the petitioner was found entitled, has been paid to him. He submits that as the petitioner has been convicted in a criminal case, hence, he has been sanctioned provisional pension and gratuity to the extent of 90% but the amount of GIS and provident fund has been paid to him. There is no rejoinder to the said counter affidavit. Having regard to the submissions made in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)