IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.5417 of 2009 Between: S.Chellemma W/o.Naga Raju R/o.Doramamidi, Buttayagudem Mandal, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Agent for Government (District Collector), W.G.District, Eluru 2 Smt. Savaram Chandramma W/o.Rajulu R/o.Pedakappa gudem Pattanapalem Post, Buttayagudem , West Godavari district 3 B.Guvaramma W/o.Gangaraju Doramamidi, Buttayagudem Mandal, West Godavari district 4 G.Venkayamma W/o.Satyanarayana R/o.Marrla gudem, Buttayagudem Mandal, West Godavari District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not passing the orders on IA.No.1 of 2008 in CMA.No.1 of 2008 pending before the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and cannot be justified in the eye of law and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to pass order in accordance with law on the IA.No.1 of 2008 in CMA.No.1 of 2008 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.5417 of 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare. It appears, aggrieved by the order dated 25.02.2008 passed in I.A.No.17 of 2007 in O.S.No.8 of 2007 by the Special Assistant Agent to Government (Revenue Divisional Officer), Jangareddigudem, whereunder the application filed by the petitioner seeking to restrain the respondents 2 to 4 herein from interfering with the plaint schedule property was dismissed, the petitioner preferred an appeal in C.M.A.No.1 of 2008 before the 1st respondent- Agent to Government (District Collector), West Godavari District, along with an application being I.A.No.1 of 2008 seeking interim injunction. The grievance of the petitioner is that neither the I.A. is disposed of nor the C.M.A. is taken up for hearing. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the 1st respondent is directed to dispose of the I.A.No.1 of 2008 or C.M.A.No.1 of 2008 filed by the petitioner, whichever is possible, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 18th March, 2009. IBL