IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7586 of 2006 LAKHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE SURAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ORHANPUR, P.S. MUFASSIL, DISTRICT NAWADA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM DISTRICT REGISTRAR, NAWADA. 3. SUB-REGISTRAR, REGISTRY OFFICE, NAWADA. 4. RAJ KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE JAGARNATH SINGH, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ORHANPUR, P.S. MUFASSIL, DISTRICT NAWADA. For the petitioner : Mr. Niraj Kumar No-1, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Maruth Nath Roy, AC to SC-25 ----------- 05. 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Counsel for the petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit placing on record extract from the refusal register book-2 dated 1.9.1998, Annexure-5 whereunder registration of the sale deed in favour of the petitioner executed by Sri Raj Kumar Singh was rejected by the Sub-Registrar, Nawada and the order was communicated to all concerned under letter no.208 dated 1.9.1998. Against the aforesaid order petitioner filed appeal before the District Registrar, Nawada which has been rejected under order dated 5.3.2006, Annexure-4. In this writ petition both the order bearing Letter No.208 dated 1.9.1998 passed by the Sub- 2 Registrar as also the order dated 5.3.2006 passed by the District Registrar has been challenged on the ground that while passing the aforesaid orders the authorities below did not even indicate reasons for not registering the sale deed in question. Having appreciated the submission of the counsel for the petitioner this Court directed for service of notice on the executant of the sale deed Sri Raj Kumar Singh through the Sub- Registrar, Nawada. In compliance of my order Sub- Registrar ensured service of notice of these proceedings on Sri Raj Kumar Singh who has not chosen to appear in this Court as prior to presentation of the sale deed in question on 1.9.1998 the lands in question was sold by Sri Raj Kumar Singh in favour of Sri Ramdhin Singh, whose counsel Sri Pasupati Prasad Sinha states that in the earlier writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.7894 of 1998 filed by this petitioner for similar relief, Sri Ramdhin Singh was made party respondent but for reasons best known to the petitioner he has not impleaded Sri Ramdhin Singh as party in the said writ case. The Sub-Registrar, Nawada confirms the fact that much before presentation of the present sale deed on 3 1.9.1998 the lands in question was transferred by Sri Raj Kumar Singh in favour of Ramdhin Singh. It appears having considered the aforesaid submission in the earlier round of litigation vide C.W.J.C. No.7894 of 1998 this Court under orders dated 6.1.2000 directed the said writ petition to be dismissed as withdrawn. I do not see any special reason to entertain the present writ petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)