FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2664 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. J.J. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 5th OCTOBER, 2010. . By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges his transfer from Mumbai to Aurangabad. It is the contention of the petitioner that the powers to effect transfer are only vested with the Board and not the Chief Executive Officer. He submits that the impugned transfer is effected on the basis of a report authorizing the Chief Executive Officer to do so. It is therefore submitted that the impugned order of transfer is not permissible in law. 2] Perusal of the minutes of the meeting of the Board dated 26th July, 2009 reveals that Ex-post sanction has been granted by the Board. We find that ex-post facto sanction would be permissible in law to authorize the transfer effected by the Chief Executive Officer. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is summarily rejected. [A.A. SAYED, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2664 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2