IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25881 of 2011(I) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- BHAMINI.P., V/531 SATHYA FURNITURE MART, ATHIPOTTA, TARUR II, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD 678 544 REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MEENAKSHYKUTTY P., W/O.LATE SANKARA NARAYANAN V. VAYYAT HOUSE, ATHIPOTTA P.O., PALAKKAD 678 544 BY ADV. SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014. 2. CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (SPECIAL AFFORESTATION) & NODAL OFFICER, CONVENER, STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE, KERALA, FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014. 3. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NEMMARA, PALAKKAD DT - 678508. 4. FOREST RANGE OFFICER, FOREST RANGE OFFICE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DT - 678541. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BENNY VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DS WP(C).No. 25881 of 2011(I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NEMMARA DATED 03.09.1996 P2: COPY OF THE LICENSE NO. 99/96-97 DATED 19.11.1996 ISSUED BY TARUR PANCHAYATH P3: COPY OF THE VERIFICATION REPORT AS NO WBI/SLC. NO 414 FC(3) 2106/09 P4: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR TINY ENTERPRISES DATED 17.2.1997 P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.06.2009 P6: COPY OF THE RECEIPT FC3-2106/09 DATED 04.11.2009 P7: COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. A1.938/2008 DATED 07.07.2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE DS ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25881/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 29th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims to be the owner of a Furniture Mart, which was established by her father late Sri.Sankara Narayanan V. who expired in the year 2006. According to the petitioner, she made an application for NOC from the second respondent and Ext.P3 is the verification report. The prayer sought in this writ petition is a direction to the respondents to pass expeditious orders on the NOC application in the light of Ext.P3 verification report. In view of the pendency of the application for NOC, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to pass orders on the application made by the petitioner in the light of Ext.P3 verification report. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any rate, in the next meeting of the empowered committee. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs