1 wp5680.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5680 OF 2010 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri C.V. Dharurkar holding for Shri R.V. Gore, Advocate for petitioners. Shri S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent/State. Shri V.D. Sonawane, Advocate for respondent no.4. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & SHRI M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 10th June, 2011. 1. The learned Advocate for the petitioners at the outset states that the petitioners do not want to press prayer `B' in the Petition, which read as follows : "(B) By issuing writ of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari, Government Resolution bearing No. VTM/ 2603/PK-1544/PR-4 (22) dated 12.02.2004 to the extent of clause 2(b) which is in respect of the population and distance between the two villages for the purpose of establishment of Independent Village Panchayat issued by the Rural Development Department, Maharashtra State may kindly be quashed and set aside." 2 wp5680.10 2. However, according to the learned Advocate, the representations submitted to the State, which are annexed to the Petition at Exhibit `C' for bifurcation of village Raigaon, have not been decided as yet. 3. In our opinion, the Petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners on 2nd February, 2010 in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of. The respondents are directed to consider the representations of the petitioners and to dispose them of in accordance with law within eight weeks from today. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/wp5680.10