fSinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. .lustice Dhirendra Mishral HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MLP. (Grt No 6688 OP 2009 PETITIONERS Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Pawan Pathak, S7o Vishnu Prasad Pathak, aged about 26 years, resident of near rest house, Ratanpur. Tahsil Kota. Distrtct Bilaspur (CG) 2. Akansha Agrawal, D/o Rohitash Agrawa!, wife of Pawan Kumar Pathak, aged about 24 yr. resfdent of Ratanpur. Tahsil Kota. Dist. lail-scniir ff^f^,\ I^IIMt»|rfU* \^>»f/ 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Superintendent of Police, District Korba (CG) 3. SupsriRtendent of Police, District Bilaspur (CG) 4. Statlon t-louse Officer, P.S. Pali, District Korba (CG) 5. Rohitash Agrawal, s/o late Ramkumar Agraws!, rssidsnt sf Chaitma, Tahsil Pali, District Bilaspur (CG) °rssent: Mr. Anand Daclariya, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passecl on 7* November, 2®09) 1. Heard. 2. The petittoners hereinhavecontracted a valtd marriage on 22-8- 2009 with mutual consent in Arya Samaj Mandir, Korba, t'lowever, because of petitioners belona to two different cemmunitles, the ^ same is not approved bythe family members of petitionerNo.2. Respondent No.5 isthe father of petitloner No.2 and he tn connivance With respondents-No.2 to 4 is attempting to harass the petitioners for marryingagainst his wtehes. 3. Shri Arun Sao. leaned Govt. AdvocateaDoearina on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 subinltted that thepetittoners shall not be harassed by respondents No.2 to 4 atthe instance of respondent lto.5. ® in 1— s ® 5 .§ a> 9 <» a.jl •g 0c^ 6)® <^»> >• ^l •o <B *& <Mi JQ3 U) ® >6s <B o a<»c36o V aic 'E ? (B c ® o — «? » •» ^ E 5 ••= - co ® a o w Z '.£. <n ? (B c c 5 i c c £ 1 1 i IIs <tt a> *^> (0 »> ^c; 2 g tf) U) <-tc 9 18co Q. 1»® o a><»c1o f> a>c: •*- C8® ;>• ja 0 •o <B co U) U) E ja3 <0 ® X: h- 10 -o a •o b«oo0 «) co a>a. <B 2: ^M ^» >> 01 c ouo< <0