1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1173/2011 ( Shaikh Shahin s/o Shaikh Ibrahim Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. HI PathanAdv. for Applicant; Mr. KS Patil APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 30 th March, 2011. ... 1) Heard. The accused/applicant, husband of the deceased, in custody for an offence under Section 302 of IPC, seeks bail. 2) F.I.R. Of neighbour illustrate the events. He refers to earlier skirmish between the couple. Two dying declarations of the deceased recorded by independent authorities implicate the accused. Spot Panchanama primarily support as to what the victim has urged. It also gears to the situation of accused/applicant sneaking away after igniting his wife. A can left over with quantity of 1 litre kerosene is in the court-yard, away from the room and the situation facilitate to leave the spot within a second. 3) Considering these aspects, even if charge sheet is filed, the brutality is at large, the witnesses are bound to be win over being tenant and amenable to threats. Consequently, no bail, application rejected. However, since the learned Additional Sessions Judge has, as on today, 13 custody matters, the learned Sessions Judge would ensure expeditious disposal of the present case also. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/