;3—f ..s3^^r' fc ^^s^" -•/^o ^- ^«y ,,^..-''-'' ^* INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^A\\ OF 2009 (S.B.l PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 6-> Smt. Kala Bai Kashyap aged about 59 years, wd/o Shri Sudru Ram Kashyap, O'ccupation - service, posted as Class-IV employee, at Kanya Ashrani Dimrapal, Tahsil Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.). R/o village & Post Dimrapal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS 1. " State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raii:)ur (C.G»). €-"' 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Developnient, Raipur (C.G.). ff-' 3. Collector, District Collectorate, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.). 4. The Secretary, Mata Rukhm.ani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil & District Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 -^ ^ /\ 0>x o \HJGH^QURT,PF_CHHATTjSGARHj..MLASPUR WRJT_PET1T!ON.IS1NO,5911.0F_2W9 PET1TLQNERS .RES.POND.ENTS Smt. Kala Bai Kashyap Versua State of Chhattisgarh & QtSiers ^tfrit petitlon under Article 226 of th@ Constitutlon of Indi®) Slngie Bench: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri. J. Present: - Shri /Mniyakant Tiwari, counsel for the petition^'. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for th@ State. (Passed on this 20th day of October..2009) 1. With the consent of Searned coynsei appearing for the partles, the petltion Is heard finajfy. 2. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submjts that the instant petjtion is squarely covered by the declsion of thls Court rendered In Smfc A. LaiJ v. State .of Chhattisgarh ^ Others1, thus the petltloner may be permltted to make a representatlon to declde her case m the Sight of afore-statedl decislon, subj^t to vertfjcatjon asto whether the respondent No,4 Institute Is a Government alded school and the petitloner is the teacher withln the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned coynsei appearing for the State subnnlts that in the event, the petltloner rnakes a representatlon, the same vrfll be considered and ciecided, In accordance with law, wlthln a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representatlon. 4. In vlev^ of foregosng, accordlng to the iearned counseS appearing for the petltioner, nothing survives in thls petltion for adjudication. 5. AccordingJy, the wnt petitlon is dssposed of. Gowrl Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 2007 (1)BU 265