IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 4488 of 2005 Between: Manjula Subba Rayudu S/o. M. Pedda Dasanna S. Kothapalli Village, Koduru Post, Kondapuram Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kadapa Kadapa District. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Kondapuram Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kondapuram Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in issuing orders to stop work by their orders in Ref.No. 31/FFWP/A/2004, dt. 3-3-2005 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and equity, in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.PARAMESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 4488 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the third respondent dated 03-03-2005 directing the petitioner to stop construction of the Grama Sachivalayam building, until further orders. This Court, while directing notice, by order dated 09-03-2005, suspended the impugned order having taken note of the fact that the Grama Panchayat was accorded permission by the District Collector to construct the Grama Sachivalayam vide proceedings dated 14-07-2004. The said order continued to be in operation all through and despite notice, the respondents have not filed any counter affidavit. Since the construction of the building has already been completed pursuant to the impugned direction, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 28-11-2008 KLP