IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17848 of 2008 1. Narayan Kamath. 2. Baijnath Kamath, both sons of Late Chotan Kamath, residents of village- Raja Rampatti, P.S. Lokehi, District- Madhubani……………………………………………..…..Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate and Collector, Madhubani. 3. The Additional Collector, Madhubani. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Fulparas, District- Madhubani. 5. The Anchaladhikari, Fulparas, District-Madhubani. 6. The Anchaladhikari, Laukahi, District-Madhubani. 7. Kalanand Sada, son of Late Ram Saran Sada. 8. Laxmi Jha, son of not known to the petitioners, both residents of village- Dhanchiya, P.S. Andhara Math, District- Madhubani. 9. Sunder Lal Mirdha, Son of Thithar Mirdha, resident of Village- Kaurhihar Lokhi, P.S. Andhra Math, District- Madhubani. 10. Laldhar Yadav, son of Maujelal Yadav, resident of Village-Rajaura Mahthaura, P.S. Andhra Math, District- Madhubani…..Respondents. ------------------ 2. 23.08.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the notice issued by the Additional Collector, Madhubani, whereby the petitioners were directed to produce the documents of the land mentioned in the notice. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that no order has been passed in pursuance to the said notice. In view of this Court, since no order has been passed the writ application is misconceived. If any order is being passed in pursuance to notice the petitioners are liberty - 2 - to challenge the same before the appropriate forum. With the above observation, the writ application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)