THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1356 of 2002 ORDER: The principal grievance of the petitioner is that though Crime No.33 of 2000 was registered against respondent Nos.5, 6 and 9, no investigation has been taken place, much less any charge sheet was filed. The petitioner is an association of the depositors with respondent No.5. It is pleaded that respondent No.5 and its associates have cheated the members of the petitioner association and the Police did not take any steps. Ancillary reliefs in the form of direction for initiation of proceedings under Act 17 of 1999 and invalidation of the sales, said to have been effected by respondent No.5, are also sought. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Home, and the learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 9. It is, no doubt, true that there was delay on the part of the Police administration in filing the charge sheet in Crime No.33 of 2000. The fact, however, remains that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, not only the charge sheet was filed, but also the case ended in acquittal. So far as the reliefs claimed under Act 17 of 1999 are concerned, this Court does not consider the feasibility to accede to the request of the petitioner, particularly at this stage. Factual changes have taken place ever since the writ petition was filed and if the petitioner still feels that it can pursue the remedies under any legislation, be it as regards the individuals or the property held by them, it shall always be open to it to do so. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:29.03.2010 kdl