1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.645 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.926 OF 1995 Popatlal Pannalal Banthia .. Applicant Versus Yadgiri Ramaswamy Kirti .. Respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J DATE : 22nd August 2005. P.C. . Heard learned Counsel appearing for applicant as well as respondent. Perused the civil application. In the light of averments made in paras 3 and 4, to which there is no reply, the civil application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Learned Counsel appearing for applicant states that the applicant would deposit arrears of rent in Small Causes Court, 2 Pune within a period of one week from today. Since, the petition is of the year 1995, both sides agree that petition may be fixed for hearing and final disposal expeditiously. Writ petition to appear on board for hearing and final disposal in the week commencing 12th September 2005. Liberty to apply. 2. In view of this, C.A. 646 of 2005 does not survive and the same is dismissed accordingly. However, in default by petitioner, liberty to respondents to apply. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)