IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2007 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 270 of 2007(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.29730/1999 Dated 23/01/2007 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER --------------------------------------------- A.LEELAMMA, RETIRED ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVT, LAW DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT KOKKAPPALLIL HOUSE, KAVADIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SC/ST DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHAIRMAN, SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR VERIFICATION OF SC/ST CLAIMS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DIRECTOR OF KRITADS, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.S.SANTHOSH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN .J ------------------------------------------ R.P No 270 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March 2007 ORDER Apart from my observations in the judgment that the petitioner was not able to obtain any stay on Ext.P11 order dated 29-10-1999 which appears to be incorrect I do not find any ground to review my judgment. The fact that the petitioner had obtained a stay on Ext.P11 order seems to be correct in view of the Annexure-1 order produced by the petitioner. However that does not make any material difference whatsoever to my judgment. In the above circumstances I do not find any merit in the review petition. Accordingly the same is dismissed. S.SIRI JAGAN .JUDGE es