THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU C.C.C.A.M.P.No.571 of 2011 and C.C.C.A.No.229 of 2010 JUDGMENT : This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 2.8.2010, in O.S.No.316 of 2003, passed by the II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for specific performance of the agreement directing the respondents to receive the balance sale consideration and to execute the registered sale deed in favour of the appellant or his nominee. 2. C.C.C.A.M.P.No.571 of 2011 is filed under Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C., seeking to record the compromise in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 28.8.2011 entered into between the parties. 3. When the matter came up for consideration, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that both the parties have settled the matter outside the Court amicably and accordingly a Memorandum of Compromise, dated 28.8.2011, had been filed by both the parties, which contains the signatures of both the parties as well as their counsel. 4. Both the parties are present before this Court, except respondent No.1. The appellant has produced before this Court his driving licence bearing No.DLDAP 009274592007, dated 6.2.1999. The appellant was also identified by his counsel. The appellant stated that he received a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees seven lakhs only) from respondent Nos.1 to 6 on 25.8.2011 towards full and final satisfaction of his claim in the above appeal. 5. In view of the fact that the parties have settled the matter out side the Court and arrived at a compromise, C.C.C.A.M.P.No.571 of 2011 is allowed. 6. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 28.8.2011 entered into between the parties. _______________________ JUSTICE K.C. BHANU 22.09.2011 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU C.C.C.A.M.P.No.571 of 2011 and C.C.C.A.No.229 of 2010 22.09.2011 (Msr)