IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2008 / 13TH POUSHA 1929 CRL.A.No.1836 of 2003 (D) -------------------------------- ORDER OF THIS COURT IN CRL.L.P.450/2003 Dated 21/10/2003 ST.2045/2000 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, THRISSUR .................... APPELLANT: COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------- K. SUBRAMANIAN, S/O. T. KRISHNA IYER, LAKSHMI NILAYAM, KUTTANKULANGARA LANE, THRISSUR-2. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED: ------------------------------- 1. VENU @ I. SANKARANKUTTY, S/O. MADHAVI AMMA, ITTAMPURATH HOUSE, HARI NAGAR, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR-2. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SMT.P.MAYA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVINDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------------------------ Crl. Appeal No.1836 of 2003 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Advocate Sri.P.K.Anil, counsel for the appellant/complainant submits that he has received Rs.45,000/- (Rupees Forty Five Thousand Only) that being the cheque amount from Smt.P.Maya counsel for the first respondent on this day. Smt.P.Maya, counsel for the first respondent submits that in view of payment of the cheque amount by the first respondent to the appellant's lawyer through her, the appeal itself be dismissed. Counsel for the appellant also submits that in view of the payment, the appeal can be dismissed. In the result, I dismiss this appeal. K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE kns/-