IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16064 of 2008 UJARAN MUSAHAR S/O CHIRKUT MUSAHAR, R/O VILLAGE- MOKARAM, P.S.- BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABUA) ……………… PETITIOENR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, BIHAR PANCHAYATI RAJ, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-COLLECTOR, KAIMUR (BHABUA) 3. DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, KAIMUR (BHABUA) 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENTOFFICER, BHAGWANPUR, KAIMUR (BHABUA) 5. REENA DEVI W/O SITA RAM DUBEY, R/O VILLAGE- DUBAULI, P.S.- BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABUA) 6. PANCHAYAT SACHIV, GRAM PANCHAYAT MOKARAM, P.S.- BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT-KAIMUR (BHABUA) ……………… RESPONDENTS ----------- 6 29/01/2009 It is common ground that the petitioner for redressal of his grievance, has approached respondent no. 2, the District Magistrate, Kaimur. Having heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma for the petitioner and GP -12 for the State as also taking into consideration the facts and circumstance of the case, we deem it expedient that respondent no. 2 takes decision on the representation of the petitioner (Annexure-2), if already not taken, within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. We direct accordingly. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be considered by the respondent no. 2 in accordance with law. - 2 - In order to facilitate early decision, the petitioner along with a copy of this order shall annex the representation (Annexure-2) filed earlier. The application stands disposed of with the observation aforesaid. (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.) (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin