IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27486 of 2011 1.Brahmanand Rai S/o Hridya Narayan Rai 2.Hridya Narayan Rai S/o late Dukh Haran Rai R/o village- Mandrawn, P.S.-Rajpur, Dist.-Buxar Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 17.8.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance has been taken for the offence under sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There is history of repeated complaint against the petitioners being launched by the complainant. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that earlier a complaint filed on behalf of the complainant was dismissed after enquiry under section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. One of the complaint was sent to the police for investigation and the police on conclusion of the investigation submitted final report. The date of marriage is not mentioned in the complaint petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the marriage had taken place in the year 2004. It is also submitted that a matrimonial case seeking decree of divorce was filed on behalf of petitioner no.1 and the same has been decreed in his favour. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, namely, Brahmanand Rai and Hridya Narayan Rai in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a 2 period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Buxar in connection with Complaint Case No.622C of 2009/ Tr. No.1347 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)