IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6697 of 2011 Feku Mian, S/O-Islam Mian Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, petitioner is named in the first information report but in course of investigation, the victim was recovered from the house of co-accused and his statement was recorded by the Investigating Officer at Para-33 of the case diary. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that learned Sessions Judge has committed an error on record holding that the victim has named the petitioner in his statement. He drew my attention towards Para-33 of the case diary in which the statement of victim has been recorded. Taking into consideration that the victim has not named the petitioner in his statement, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sessions Trial No. 535 of 2010 arising out of Nautan P.S. Case No. 372 of 2004. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)