R.S.A. No. 814 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 814 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.02.2009 Inder ....Appellant Versus Smt. Suhkhdei and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: Mr. A.K. Kansal, Advocate, for the appellant. ***** VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL) This regular second appeal is directed against the judgments and decree dated 31.8.2007 and 15.1.2009 passed by the learned Courts below vide which the suit for possession filed by the plaintiff/appellant stands dismissed. Prior to the institution of the present suit, the appellant had filed two suits for permanent injunction. In the first suit, a statement was suffered by the defendants that they would not interfere in the possession of the plaintiff. In spite of the suit having been finally adjudicated, plaintiff chose to file the second suit, which was dismissed in default. Thereafter, the present suit was filed. However, the plaintiff failed to disclose the previous suit filed by him, in the pleadings. R.S.A. No. 814 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Consequently, both the learned Courts below have held that as the plaintiff/appellant has not come to Court with clean hands, he was not entitled to discretionary relief of injunction.. The learned Courts below were, therefore, justified in declining the relief to the plaintiff, as it is settled law that person not coming to Court with clean hands is not entitled to discretionary relief of injunction. The judgment and decree being in consonance with settled law, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law for consideration by this Court. No merit. Dismissed. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge February 19, 2009 R.S.