IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12826 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR @ KARPHU @ KAJU SON OF LATE BALDEO PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOH. NEW PURANDERPUR, P.S. JAKKANPUR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey,A.P.P. ----- 2. 21.6.2010. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 21.1.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge XIth, Patna in Sessions Trial No.108 of 2007. By the said order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the discharge petition filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A case vide Jakkanpur P.S. Case No.239 of 2007 was registered for the offence under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal code and petitioner was made sole accused in the F.I.R. During investigation, the victim minor girl was recovered and her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. was recorded in which she alleged that she was forcibly kidnapped by the petitioner with other accused persons on 2 N.H./ the point of pistol and thereafter, she was administered some intoxicant. There was specific allegation against the petitioner. At the stage of charge, the petitioner filed petition for his discharge and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, by the impugned order, has rejected the discharge petition. On perusal of the record as well as the impugned order, I do not find any defect. There is no merit in the petition and petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)