^) ^/ :^>¥ (71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH WritPetitron No. 3^S^ of2006 PETITIONER: ^' ^.-•' I^SPONDENTS: -^ B1LASPU8 • ^j:^^ Dr. S.P Tiwari, S/o Late K.P. Tiwari, Aged about 50 years, Block Education OfGcer, Pratappur, Tehsil: Prafappur, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 4. ChiefExecutive Officer, r Zila Panchayat: Surguja, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 5. Priyaranjan Singh, Lecturer & In-charge Principal, Govemment Giris Higher Secondary School, Ramanujganj, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPMATE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTION8 ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF 3VIANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WmT OF LIKE NATITRE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 Wrlt Petttion No.3088 of 2006 Dr. S.P. Tiwari - Versus - State of Chhattisgarh and others •e' Present: - Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate Smt, Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Adv For fhe petitioner. For respondent No. 1 to 3. Roshan/- O R,D B R (Passed on 6th September, 2006) Before Hoa'ble Mr. Satish K Aaaihotri. J. Leamed counsel appeariag for the petitioner, ou instructions, subinits that the petitiou has beconie infructuous on account of the fact that the unpugned order has been superseded by subsequent order dated 7.7,2006, to which leamed counsel for respondent No.l to 3 has no objection. Accordiagly, fhe petition is dismissed as haviug become infructuous. No order as to cost. ; Sd/- ! satishK.Agnihotri ' Judge