Tttlaa M3N '-I3UOTSSIUIUIOO punj lUSpIAOJd IB^USQ 3L[J, (•0-0) jndsBiig 'jsS^UBl/V ABMITB^ pUOTSTATQ S^.1 - V^nOJ.Vft 'AteMireg pj^uao ^.SBg ipnos (-0-0) Bdureqo -jigrirep 'JO^OSJTQ §ui§Bire]/\[ s^i - qgnojip (•o-o) BdureL(o -jigftjGp' ^OU^STQ 'sau^snpui aguodg uoji vjsv-spaj.d s/y^ •TL[I3Q A3M 'jnoqBq jo AI^SIUI]/\[ viSnojv^. 'Bipuj jo uoyufi / ^ .0 ° ^.<^;% OI-Q ^60 ^- «./.*•*' "I snsaaA (W-eOOe/E;9Z/8S9^,I/03 7o]J^unooov jaqijosqng SUIABH) ("0"0) Bdurei.o-jiSfLrep ^OTJ^SIQ 'JBAYpPJBg BI^ '«9» na-q^S ^sod '^q^qg T{aj?[BS ag^niA - jo ^uspisaj '•edurei.o-jigfirep • "WSTQ 'sau^snpui sguodg UQJI i.[s^?[BJd 's/]/\[ ui 'jBApBjeg 'J3?[jo^v Smpig A'BM{rey '-inoq^q 'ABp'e^ urey Aiqg uqg jo uos 'sjBa^^5 ^noq^ p3§B 'AVpT3\ UTBJiqSB^ sj.NaaNOdsaa /^® ^<""^i>.. .-^^'•^ ...-•-"©r^>"" -^p^ aaNOiAuad 900Z/ •ON NOIAUad J,IHA anjsv^a AV HavosiJnLVHHO do JLanoo HOIH SHA NI iRHSC -e>^t. /^ ^7<^ S^S^^tei ^ / f 5. Regional provident Pund Ccimmissioner near ^ Rajbandha Maidan, Raipur Chhattisgarh Deputy Director (Vigilance) Employee Provident Fund Organization, Western Region/.office, Bandra, East Mumbai (M.S.), 341, Provident Fund Building - 400051 (MUMBAI) / ^~- i 7. Enforcement Officer, Eployment Provident Fund Tilak Nagar, Ne^r Nehru Chowk BUaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, '-S. >?•;- <°- \s [ ^'f, ^ H!GH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUI PETITIONER RESPONDENTS T PETITION N0. 477 OF 2006 Kashiram Ysdav ^:.. \',vsrsus Union of India & syVrit Petition underArtlde 226/227 of the Constitution of india) Sinale Bench : Hon"b!e Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Shri A.N. Bhskta, counse! forthe petiti Shri Anand verma, standina counse! india/resDondent No.1. ser. 'or ihe Union C-t ^ V! ^^ ^^k [^*»a rf-4,^ I i/^ A <"»*Vd^il A J/t> ^ j^a/*^ a svitf**ii^*^^ •^jt *rf '^yrtk» ^»^ •^^»^"ht^/^s/ ^nn c?8H|3y l^. AQf3Vrf)8i. counsei TOf XHS rssponosr Shri Pradeep Saxena, counsei for the responde Ho.' Shri 7. ,P.S. Bhatia. Dv. Govt. Advocate forthe State. oni Gown (Passed on this 16'" day of February, 2010) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities may be directed to examins the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order. 2) At this juncture, Shri Saxena, learned counsei appearina for the respondents No.4 to 7, submiis that necessary steps have been taken, enquiry has been conducted and the appropriate order has been passed, however, if any grievance stiit survives, the petitioner may approa.ch the respondent No.5 who shall consider his grievance and pass appropriate orders, in accordance wit'n iaw. - 3) Sn view of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner noihina survives in this petition for adjudicatiQn. 4) Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd'- S.K. Agnihotn judgs