rv.r'A T" BEK £'<=^S7 IN THE HON' OF CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUK (C.G.1 Writ Petition (S) No. ^^0/2011 PETITIONERS .^•("/••^ \^^^/// *>"'' RESPONDENTS 1. Rohit Kumar Sinha, S/o Gajanand Sinha, aged about 41 years, R/o Village Chhura, Post and Tahsil Chhura, P.S. Chhura, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). -2. Umedi Gada, S/o Hari Ram, aged about 49 years, R/o ViUage- Khurshupali, Post Lohjhar, P.S. Chhura, Tahsil Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary Department of P.W.D., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer, P.W.D. Raipur Division, Raiupr, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Executive Engineer P.W.D., Gariyaband, Division Ganyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) , 4. Sub Divisional Officer, P.W.D. Sub Division Rajim, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATfISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (8) No. 1150 of2011 PETITIONERS : Rohit Kumar Sinha & Another. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSlTtVriON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Ashok Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. Shd Sushil I>iibey, Govemment Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORDERfOKAL) (Passedoa 01stdayofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission offhis Court to withdraw this petition. 2. Leanied counsel appearing for ofher side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordmgly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as wifhdrawn. —:r°m Li-UL