IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUMCHHATI‘ISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO.$3\S /2009. PETITIONER: Biseshar Prasad Sahu, son of Lat6 Ram Bharose Sahu, aged about 52 years, working as Upper Division K “we Teacher, posted at Govt. Midddle 0“ School, Block Tilkeja, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. VCI'SU S f. Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, ; Mam r Mm:” , The Secretary Tribal Welfare Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, a Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. /Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3.’ Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. 4. /Dlock Education Officer, Block Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ‘WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA " l. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER(S): / HEGH COB‘RT OF CHH;Q'FTESGH A? EELASPUR wan, Mr. JustrEce Pmiaker mwakef Wr§€ Pemmn ($3 No. 3315 0f 20639 PE'H‘xmiEQ Biseshar Pra$ad Sahu. VERSUS RE$PONDENT$ State 0f Chhattisgarh and others. Shri K.S. Pawar counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yaswant Singh Thakur Dy. AG far respondents/State. WR§T PETkTlON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ENDIA ORaER _ (13.912099) finaiiy. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard By way of this petition the petitioner is seeking regular pay scaie on the post of Assistant Teacher. Counsei for the petitioner submits that number of identical petitions have been decided by this Court and the issue involved is a conciucied one. He has also referred to one of the orders in WP. (S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh) in which regular pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsei for the respondents/State submtts that in the light of the judgment of this Court the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concerned and the same would be decided after scrutinizing the factual and iegat position. Thus it is directed that ii the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shaii be decided within a further period of one month from the date of its receipt. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed ofg Sdl- Pritinker 'Biwaker Judge i i l i i )