J $mGLE BENCK <e^',^— IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. (S)No.^G^ / 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS !^-:-^^ ^?^'"" .^T^.^%V--"" \^99 cVvt\^V^\. \ '^•'•*t ,^5^2" ^-"" : Rajesh Kumar /Sarathe S/o Amar Singh Sarathe, Age about 40, Sitla ward near Nagar Nigam Office,Ambikapur District-Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Versus -<1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, General administrative Department Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . 3. The Secretary, school Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) , 4. The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat and Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G) ,5. The Secretary, Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA HIOH CQURT..OF CHHATTXaGARHAT BILASPUR 8B i HON'BLB MR. JU8TICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.fSi.WO. 3806/2011 PSTITIONBR . R^iesh Kumar Sarathe versu^ State of C.Q. & Others Shri Keshav Gupta, counsel for the petxtioner. Shri Ya.shwant Singh Thakur, Dy. A.O. for the State. WRIT PBTmON (yNOJBR ARTICia 226 OT THB GONSTITSJTICW Or mpiA ORDBR (18.07.2011) Qrievance of the petittoner in the present petition te that he m an unemployed youth and has acquired qualification of Bachelor of Librarian in the year 1996 but thereafter no vacanoy for the post of Ubrarian was advertised and now in some of the districts the post of librarian has been advertised like (Annexure P/8) and in the saxne^ the upper age limifc is 35 years and taking the advantage of the caste the same comea to 37 yeara. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for Surguja district the post of Librarian is likely to be advertieed and therefore he may be permitted to approach the Goverpment authorities tbr grant arf age relaxation. He however submits that the Govemment authorities be dwected to cansider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law- State counsel subraite that the petitioner oannot claim any age relaxation from this court and it is up to the State authoritieB to fbc the age limit. He however has no objection if the petitioner makea any representation and the same is being decided in accordance with law. Accordinglyy the petitioner 1s pemaitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before the authority concemed and in the eventuality of filing any such repreaentation the same may be deeided by the authority concemed in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly diamiseed as 'withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. "~ 8d/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge