IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9733 of 2010 RAVI KUMAR SON OF MAHENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 27.8.2009 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after having remained one year in custody and also stating about his antecedents. The petitioner has remained in custody since 20.2.2009 and he is an accused in only one other case i.e. Sone Nagar Rail P.S. Case No. 20 of 2008 as stated in paragraph 13 of the petitioner. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya, in Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 183 of 2008 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of - 2 - misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail will verify the fact that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case as mentioned above. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)