THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.25528 of 2011 ORDER: The relief sought for in this Writ Petition is to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3, in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property i.e. house in plot Nos.45 and 46 and D.No.1-387 in L.P.No.386/82 situated in Krishna Reddy Nagar, Anantapur District, as illegal and arbitrary. A consequential direction is sought to respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere with the petition schedule property. The petitioner claims to be the owner, and to be in possession, of the aforesaid property consequent upon his father having purchased the property in a public auction conducted by the bank to whom the property was mortgaged by the erstwhile owner viz. Smt A.G.Prameela. It is his specific case that, though the fourth respondent had no connection, whatsoever, with the property in question, she tried to illegally interfere with his possession, and had sought the assistance of the third respondent to settle the disputes in the police station. The petitioner asserts that he was summoned frequently to the police station, and threatened that criminal cases would be foisted against him. In the counter affidavit filed, the third respondent would deny the allegation of having called the petitioner to the police station more so as no case was registered against him or a complaint received from anyone including the fourth respondent with regards the subject property; the disputes between the petitioner and the fourth respondent are civil in nature; the official respondents had nothing to do with the disputes; and, at no point of time, had he locked the main door of the petitioner’s house, or had prevented him from entering inside. In view of the assertion in the counter affidavit filed by the third respondent that no complaint has been received against the petitioner, and the police officials are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the fourth respondent, I see no reason to delve further into the matter. Recording the submission of the third respondent, the Writ Petition is closed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date:14.09.2011 usd