IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11131 of 2010 RESHMI WIFE OF MOGAL R/O- OLD PLICE LINE, GANDHI MAIDAN, P.S. GANDHI MAIDAN, DISTRICT - PATNA Versus 1. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH IT’S MAYOR, BUDH MARG PATNA. 2. MUNCIPAL COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 3. CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 4. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NUTUN RAJDHANI ANCHAL, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 10 HARDING ROAD, PATNA. ----------- 02. 20.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Biswa Bibhuti Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent – corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation as Sanitary worker on 30th of June 2009, retiral dues of the petitioner as indicated in paragraph -1 of the writ application has not been settled and paid despite representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent State submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be considered as per law at the earliest. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a 2 representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)