HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition £0,4472 9f 209‘? G.C. Marko, sjo Shri Hecira Singh, aged aout 49 yeaxs, r/o Oftice of Deputy Director, District Of{ice, Panchayat 8r, Social Welfare, Janjgir, Dist. Jangir Champa (CG) Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, fhrnugh the Secretaly, Department of Social Welfare, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G)’ 2. Smt. Parvan' Sahu, Deputy Director, OEce of District 0&6, Panchayat 65 Social Welfare, Jashpur {c.G). 3. Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Janjgir, Champa (CG). RESPONDENTS Writ Petition uls 226 of the Constitution of India Appearance: Shri Sunil Otwani, couueel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, P.L. appears for the State on advance COPY ORAL ORDER q06.s.o7) Sunil Kumar Sinha, J, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who is working as Iii-Charge Deputy Director at Janjgir haS been transferred to Dantewada by impugned transfei‘ mider dt.29.6.2007 on adminietrative grounds. He submits that the yetitioner has not completed 3 yeare at Janjgir, therefore, the order is in violation of transfer policy dtil3th of June, 2007. He also submits that the order has been made to acoommod ate respondent no.2. 2 W.P.§S§ N0. 4472/07 @ Needhass to say that theSF, an: not the t'grolinds on which the transfe1€ are to he interfered. hy a Court of law. UnJess thf: transfhr orders are vitiated by malafide or extraneous; considaration or are effected in vimation of any snatutmy Ruhs or the: Act, the Cotirts are not to interfare in it. Having heaxti learns/$1 comma} for fhe petitionar and after going through the mconis of tho Writ petition, I am not indinod to issue any writ, on this point: HoWtaver, the petitioner) if so advised) may file a representation in this regard bafore the concerned authority which. shat} he decided on its own merits in aocordanco with law, at the earliost. With the ahova diroction/oboewatiou, this potition stands finally disposed of. r Sd/— 1 Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge 0e. as per miles. /Raof