IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9529 of 2002 Between: Thoka Yellappa S/o Bheemappa R/o Doulatabad Village & Mandal, Mahaboobnagar Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Mandal Revenue Officer Doulatabad Mandal & Village, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer Narayanpet Division, Narayanpet Post, Mahaboobnagar Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE CVNR,J W.P. NO.9529 OF 2002 The Court made the following Order: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “To issue a direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (1) declaring the Memo issued by the 1st respondent in Memo No. A/1754/98, Dt.7.5.2002 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, 2) declare the order passed by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No. B/1873/98, dt: 15.7.1998 as illegal, arbitrary and violates the principle of natural justice and set aside both the proceedings; (3) Consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the land in Sy. No. 997 and 998 in an extent of Ac.4.00 and Ac.1.00 situated at Doulatabad Village and Mandal, in possession of the petitioner and pass any further order or orders.” At the hearing, Sri N. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the orders passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No. 1057 of 2001, no further orders in this writ petition need be passed. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P. No.11735 of 2002 ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 22nd October, 2008 pnb