li' •FWftl •h-A^tS^ c •f'loot SINGLE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 Writ Petition N0. ^fS Of 2006 PetitLoner ^ ....••" \v\ "..-^t-^ ..-••:nc^" ^' V .^ ..•••'<;- Sl'-^ - ..•••' ^-^^;>' .>iSt~' ..**' -f'".. >•" Respondents D^ / D. S. Hirwani, Aged about 53 years, Son of Late Shri Subhash Lal Hirwani, Working as Upper Division Teacher, Pt. Nehru, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Station Road, Durg (C.G.). Resident of New Adarshnagar, Borsi Road, Durg (C.G.). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Director, Directorate, Public Instructions, Pensionbada, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg, (C.G.). 4. The Shanti Bhartiya Shikshan Samiti, Through: The Secretary, Shanti Bhartiya Shikshan Samiti, Pt. Nehru Higher Secondary School, Station Road, Durg, District Durg (C.G.). vs*ss^i^^i ^^^^% A 2.,' - 5. The Principal, pt; Nehru Hi9her Secondary DistrictDurg (C.G.). i-,lT^tJ j?n^!it II^T MJ.&M LUUK i U' B Petitioner t). S. Hirwani Versus Resoondents State Chhatrisgarh and others A.K. Shan Versus Resoondents State of Chhattisaarh and others W. P. No. 7 stitioner •sus State of Chhattisgarh and othsrs Petitioner S.N. Harmukh State of Chhattisoarh and otners i, J21_of_ Petitloner &.N. Sahu •sus 5tate of Chhattisgarh ai'id Ot'ners And Petitionsr Ku. Jyoti &olcha Versus tiesoo State of Chhattisgarh and Others 2 SB; Hon'ble h\r. Justice Satish K. AenjhotrL J Present; 5hri P.P. 5cmu, counsel for the Shn' V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Jain, Panel lawyer for the "esp GeneraS with A*s. Sunr re. (Passed on this 9th day of February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel cypearing for the petitioners as weil as for the State/respondents Jointly submtt thcit the facts of tiie present writ ostitions are similar to that of in W. P. No. 4108 of (5mt. A. Lali ys. State of Chhattisgarh d others) and other connected matters, which were cllowed vide order dated 6.2.2007. They furthe" subn'iit that the question of law involved is also ths same. 2. In view of the aboye-stated submissions made by learned counsel for 1+se pcrtles, these wrlt petitions o.re ailowed in terms of the ordsrs dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in Vi,/. P. No. 4108 of 2005 cnd othe" connected matters. No orde" as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on recor'd in o1+ser connected writ pet'tions. Kvr Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge