e^/ Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. -^(10 / 2006 PETITIONER ..•••"^/ )/'J^'' .•••' ^^5t^/ ^^/^ t^' /.-^' Smt. Anjali Savant Bandhey, W/o. Shri S.R. Bandhey, aged about 38 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Hr. Sec. School- Kondagaon, Block - Kondagaon, Distt. - Jagdalpur (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/^?' T*.^ T /,G ,^^ ^^/y'' ^^^ ^" , ^*" ^MRNA^ ^.flff ,1 H State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Weffare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.( '>< ^Caha^S WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. MSH COURT OF CHkWmSfiARH AT MLASHJB SIN6LE 8ENCH : ^WfWJEfHLS^TtW K. AWWffWL. J. WRIT PETmON fS.l N0 7104 OF 2006 Pethwner ; Puahpraj Singh versus ftespondents Stnte af Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner WRFT PETmON fS.l NO.nOSOF 20(te : Saiyyad Ahnwd Zameel Ruvi versus Respondents Statc of ChhutMsgarh and others Petitiorier WRTT PETTTION (S 1 N0 71070F 2006 ; Basnnt Kumar Chauhon 1 versus Respondents : State of Chharttisgarh and o'thws Petitjoner WRTT PETTTION (S.l N0.7108 OF : Abckil Latif Menwn versus Respondents Stnte of Chhatt'hgarh and others WRTT PETTTION fS.) N0.7109 OF 2006 Ptetitiorier : Smt. Anju Sorri versus ftespondents : StnteofOihattisgarhandolhers Petitionec WRTT PETmON fS.l N0.7110 OF 2006 Smt. Aijali Suvant Bondhey versus Respondents : Statc of Chhattiagarh and others Ptetitioner 1 (^ WST PETmON fS.l N0.7111 OF 2006 Ajay Kumar Neg versus Respondents Storte of Chhafisgarh ond o-t+wrs Petrtwneri WRIT PETmON (S.) N0.7119 OF 2006 RcyeshPandey R'sspondents Petitjoner versus : Storte of ChhcrttiS9arh and olhers WRIT PETmONfS.) N0.7148 OF 2006 Respondents Petitmner versus Smt. Arrita Yadw Stute of Chhotti^orh and others WRTT PETmON fS V N0.7149 OF 2006 ; Man9hi Rom Poyeun yersts Responderits S'tate of Chhattiagarh and o'riwrs And Petitioner! WMT PFTmON fS.) N0.7150 OF 2006 Anand Scha versus Respondents Slate of Chhcrttisgarh ond ol+iers Pnesent : Mr. A.S. Raj|»jt,counsel for the petitioner(s). ?mt. Anju Ahuja, Oeputy Sovemment Advocute for the StntB/respondents. ORDER (Passed on Ihis 21** doy of DecenAer, 2006) Leameil |counsela(qxcB'in9 forthe pe+itieners and cdso forthe Storte/respondents jointfy submit -that -rtie facts and question of hw» involwd in •ftwe preaent writ petitfans <re aquarely cwered by •thc deciskm of -(hjs Court- m -the case of yiafiwwtt Kuinar Wwrwlwoj v». Mwri^pal Cuywwnwi. Owy end anairtw^. 2. For t^p iaforenwaitioned neasons, the writ petMionsare disposed 8 . . ' . . _ . . . ! _-'.'. of in terms |of -the decision of this Court in Ihe mcrt-ter of yeafiwant Kumw ttwrmlwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fnct as to .-•" 1: : ' ' : • : s-ther the petitioners hove aoquired B.Ed. Cerl'ificutes at •their otm expenses cs per the circuhrs dated 24-12-1998 ond l-3-1999 and further whe'yher they hwe been paid two advance hcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. of lhis order be placed on -the record of Ihe coraieeted witpetitwns. Sd/- Satish K. A{ Judge Subhtah 1 20060EI)AWJR-C696