1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.562 OF 2010 The Secretary, Uttarbharti Education Society and anr ....Petitioner. Vs. Shri Vedprakash Parashnath Pandey and 3 others ....Respondents. Ms. Bhavika Kawle with Sureshkumar J. Panickar, for the Petitioner. Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 6th April, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 7th December, 2009, whereby Application for Condonation of delay was allowed. There is no dispute that the learned Single Judge, by order dated 23rd July, 209, permitted the respondent to file appeal preferably within four weeks against the same order of termination dated 9.4.2009. Later on the order was challenged in appeal and the Division bench by order dated 9.9.2009, maintained the same by observing that the appeal to be filed and should be considered. The otherside has also accepted the same without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. 2. The appeal is filed on 6.10.2009 before Tribunal. In view of reasoning given in para 5 of the impugned order, in my view it needs no interference. Even otherwise in the interest of justice as Court has permitted and allowed the parties to invoke the proper remedy. 2 3. In view of the above I see there is no case made out by the petitioner to interfere with the order. The petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)