IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3063 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3063 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3063 OF 2005 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.918 OF 2005 APPEAL (L) NO.918 OF 2005 APPEAL (L) NO.918 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1699 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1699 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1699 OF 2005 M/s. All India Manufacturers’ .. Applicants Organisation V/s General Kamgar Union (Red Flag) .. Respondents & Others ----- Shri.Jayesh K. Desai for the Applicants. None for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2006. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2006. DATE : 24TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking the condonation of 37 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)