FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Civil application No. 3727 of 2005 (Smt. Sadhana wd/o Purushottam Badwaik & ors. Vs. Managing Director, J. Jailalita Transport Corpn. Madras & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. N.N. Motghare, Adv. for the applicants. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 19 th June, 2008 Since, on last occasion, Ms. Wankhade had appeared on behalf of the respondent no.1, the office objection pertaining to the absence of service to the respondent no.1, does not survive. Heard Shri Motghare, the learned counsel for applicants. None appears on behalf of the respondents, though served. The respondents have also not filed any reply to the civil application, though time was sought till today by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1. The statements of facts in the civil application, therefore, remain uncontroverted. Hence, for the reasons stated in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the civil application, delay of 295 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE RMP