IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13820 of 2009 JOGI LAL, S/O- LATE RAGHO BAITHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAGATI DHARAMPURA, POST OFFICE – JITWARIA, POLICE STATION – KALYANPUR, DISTRICT – SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110001. 2. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSION, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, (PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSION), NEW DELHI – 110001. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (FUNDS) DEFENCE ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI. 4. THE COMMONDANT, JAK LI REGIMENT CENTRE, C/O- 56 AP0. 5. SRI USP KUSHWAHA, JOINT CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (FUNDS) OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (FUNDS, MEERUT CANTONMENT, MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH. 6. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE AAO (PAY) NORTHERN COMMAND, C/O- 31 SUB AREA, C/O 56 APO ----------- 02. 26.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount towards the provident fund has not been paid correctly. However, petitioner has received a sum of Rs. 1,36,469.00 instead of 1,71,854.00. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating the details of his unpaid claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 3 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the unpaid admitted dues of the petitioner could be settled with statutory interest without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)