IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2099 of 2010 1. ASHOK PRASAD S/O LATE SURAJ RAJAK R/O MOHALLA- PARVATTI, P.S.- TATARPUR, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR. ANUP MUKHERJEE, THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR 2. MR. NARENDRA PRASAD, CHIEF ENGINEER, SOUTH BIHAR, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. MR. SATYENDRA NARAIN SINGH, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, EAST BIHAR CIRCLE, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, BHAGALPUR 4. MR. BINAY KUMAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD DIVISION, CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, MUNGER ----------- 2/ 23/03/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The direction was to consider for grant of A.C.P. benefits without passing the departmental accounts examination in light of a Finance Department Circular dated 12.8.1992. Annexure-A to the show cause states that he has been found eligible for grant of A.C.P. as directed therein. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the actual monetary benefits still remain elusive. If A.C.P. has been allowed, the grant of actual monetary benefits is but a necessary consequence amenable to the contempt jurisdiction and no specific directions to that effect were required. 2 Let the order of the Court be complied with in its true letter and spirit by payment of actual monetary benefits to the petitioner in terms of Annexure-A within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner is compelled to approach this Court for the same relief again, the Court may be constrained to consider matters appropriately. The contempt proceedings stand disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)