1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.7748 of 2011 K.Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodalputhur Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 30.04.2011 and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER Seeking a direction to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 30.04.2011, the petitioner has come up with the present petition. 2.According to the petitioner, his wife Mrs.Munniyammal was done to death and in respect of the said occurrence, though he made a complaint on 30.04.2011, no case has been registered. 3.The second respondent has filed a status report before the Court, in which, in paragraph No.3, it is stated as follows: “It was revealed from the enquiry made on the place of occurrence that the complainant Arumugam lived with the deceased Muniyammal only for a few years after marriage and thereafter he deserted his first wife, Muniyammal and he married one Panchu of Erikkalantham as his 2nd wife. Thereafter, the first wife Muniyammal started lived infrastructures her namely Kulammangalam along with her step mother. As per enquiry Infrastructures the Village and from the statement the deceased Muniyammal had suffered from the illness of T.B for a quit long time and the death was caused due to the above said disease. The complainant Arumugam never visited his first wife Muniyammal at Kulamangalam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Village at any point of time. The death is natural one. Therefore the complaint of the petitioner herein Arumugam was closed as mistake of fact. This status report may kindly be accepted.” 4.In view of the above position, it is not a fit case to issue any direction as prayed for. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he can work out his remedy by making appropriate complaint before the Jurisdictional Magistrate. In such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodalputhur Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. + 1 cc to Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Advocate, SR No.35153 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.7748 of 2011 10.10.2011 vs RJ/28.10.11 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/