IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-35190 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 16, 2011 Sudhir Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Rimplejeet Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 196 dated 27.10.2010, under Sections 407, 409, 420 IPC and Section 7,10, 55 of the Essential Commodities Act, registered at Police Station Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the arrest of the stay vide order dated 01.12.2010, petitioner had participated in the investigation. CRM M-35190 of 2010 Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of ASI Surinder, Investigating Officer, has stated that after the investigation, petitioner is not found involved in the offence and cancellation report has already been forwarded to the higher authorities for approval. Considering totality of the circumstances, I direct that in the event of arrest, petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, it is clarified that petitioner shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required to do so. Disposed of accordingly. February 16, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2