^^vy y^-^ IN 'nBK HIGH COURT OE' JUDICATURE AT BILASPUiEii^HHATTlSGARH W.P. N0.53 8 OF 2002 Petitioners l.ArabujaCeinentEastemLtd (Previously known as M/s Modi Cement Ltd.) A Company duly uicorporated Under the Companies Act 1956 having its registered Qffice at Rawah, Tafasil Baloda Bazar, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Mr. Kranti Agrawal S/o Shri J.P. Agrawal Share Holder Opp. Police Station Baloda Bazar Distt. RaipwfC.G.) Respondents /- ^- VERSUS . Steel Authority ofIndiaLtd. Through its Managihg Director Bhilal Steel Plant, A conipany Registered under the Companies Act 1956, R|gistered Office at Ispat Bhavah, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. ^. . General Manager (MSsSP) Bhilai Steel Plant Durg. PEnTIONUNDER^UinCLE2260FCONSTn"UTIQN C lSlM.ViQRf!^OASG^^^WK W.'SWE.V^fyv^^C^^ WAmf&JWS^'DIEiSCTt^jfSlREGTiaN^^^e^^ ORDER6. XI-HC—78 sn^i'^i K-iT'h '^Tsrr 3Fn^r »)*ii'^ ?ST •<<<t<ti<;i'4/®Ti1-M''[(o,^cira'^ tliHCTF fll+iieb "% 200 3ii^T''ra^'.:(' ^ -^•(Jffl^T fl^fl 3TT^[ ofer 10.2.2005 On a inention being-made;ti'|s 5hri Ravindra Shrivastavd, Francis ond Shri Ashish Shr'ivaiitafc Shri P. Oiwcsker, Senior for the resjaondents, Heard. . Ledrned Senior Advocdte term of agreement is already requires to be resoived is that fi|'; fne respondents herein ehdirged •i+iat talks were eitready going or| amount, and Today he is not taken place or not so ^far. In the petitioners be permitted r^spondents arid';' the ^ respondenT^ sceorda"ce with law, to whiclji respondents has no objecti,on, In the drcumstances, thej repr'esentatjon to the respondent^ days from today, .in. turn, ropraeontation within !mo:thop' t^ •je sasa is taken up rw heio.vmg. Senior Adtvoarte with 5hri Prem i, Advocates fop the petltioner's. AcjvocaTe wi1ti Shrl Kunal &as, Advocate awafe case ^ ^I^^'-t .trt;4icii'?f fe^ <f<> ^R .^3ifg*r'3:ii^i • " por the peTiTioners submits That the and now, th®only dispute .which I'om Itie period 15.B.2Q02 to 2.11.2003 lexecss amciunt. H®further submits reg&rding ddjustment of the excesc as To whel+ier any ddjustroent hcfs the adjustment has not taken place |'o move represenTdtion before the •^ be flirec+ed to dscide the same in learned Senior Counsel for the pe+i+ioners are altowed to make Q •^ raising their al 1 grievonces. within, 10 ^he responderits shdl);' decide the mon'rtia from thc <:!Btc of :rcscipt of_ -2L: :^^:.-^^"--~^^ -'-'-Rfc- XI-HC—78 STI^T q^ R-<i«h w sn^r stit<i=b ^^•iu^i<a^»Ti]*l»i<o^Rt<'ii<:iy,<' *<!*iwr^w<i ^n^^Rs^^yiI^S'^)^ 'siaRR'gftCT sn^i r'epresentation wH+i areasoneci o^cier af-terconsiderin^-H'iepointsrdised bythepetitJQners,inaccoF'dance4ittltaw. . With the direction dforesaii ^pild-4tTl 3fl*t?Tf ^IW^ <f<i*$K ^;3TfgiT3n^T. ^ , i, the petition stands disposed of. Consefluen+ly, I.A.Nos.Il9^3/26Q3, 399/20Q4, amd 2096/2004 atso stond disoosed of. Parties ar»entjtlec( for cer'jified eopy of ttiis lorciet?. Sd/- _- L.C. Bhadoo Judge -•-u., / .•;•.•