THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 2844 OF 2008 DATED: 14.2.2008 Between: A.Venkata Ramana Reddy …… Petitioner And The Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., Piler, Piler Mandal, Chittoor District represented by its President and others. … … Respondents THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO. 2844 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the member of the 1st respondent – Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, Pileru. It is his case that Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies of Talapala, Regallu, Mudupula Mandals were merged with the 1st respondent society in the year 2005 and thereafter elections were conducted to the 1st respondent society and the Managing Committee of the said society has violated the provisions of Bye law Nos. 11(4) and 14(4) of the Byelaws. An enquiry was conducted by the Sub-Divisional Co- Operative Officer, Vayalapadu at the instance of respondents 2 and 3 and he gave a report to the effect that certain amounts were refunded to 1663 members in contravention of the mandatory provisions of the Bye laws and accordingly recommended for necessary action against the Managing Committee through letter dated 12.9.2007. It is also stated that apart from the letter of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner along with various other members made representations to the authorities on 11.7.2007 but so far no action has been taken. Hence this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation. The only grievance of the petitioner is that though he along with several other members made representations to respondents 3 and 4 on 11.7.2007 for taking appropriate action against the Managing Committee of the 1st respondent society, no action has been initiated so far. At this stage both the learned counsel requested that the writ petition may be disposed of directing the official respondents to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner expeditiously. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 3 and 4 to take appropriate action on the representation submitted by the petitioner on 11.7.2007 expeditiously. _______________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 14.2.2008 msv