IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17091 of 2006 Between: P.V. Ramana babu S/o P.Surya Janardhana Rao R/o 15-12-34/1. Gavarapalem, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad. 2 The Station House Officer, Patancheruvu Police Station, Patancheruvu, Medak District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.V.PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the goods vehicle/lorry bearing No. AP31Y 2147 belonging to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and nonest, and to direct the 1st respondent to accept the personal bond submitted by the petitioner and release the vehicle bearing No. AP31Y 2147 immediately without surrendering the same to the concerned Hon'ble Court in obedience to Circular memo Rc.No. 3900/Compts-3/2002 dated 11-11-2002 issued by the Director General and inspector General of Police, A.P., Hyderabad.” At the hearing, Sri V.V.Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.21431 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th JUNE, 2009. kvni