IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2009 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6626 of 2009(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.N. SAGAR, SREEKOVIL, PANANGAD, PUNALUR P.O. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, PUNALUR. 3. MR. M. NISSAR, SUB ENGINEER, PUNALUR. BY ADV.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 6626 OF 2009 W ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P8. It is an order purportedly passed after detection of unauthorised load. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. One of the contentions taken by the petitioner is that the petitioner was not given an opportunity for hearing. 3. Having heard the parties, I feel that it is necessary to direct reconsideration of the matter after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. In such circumstances, writ petition is disposed of as follows. Ext.P8 is quashed. The 2nd respondent will take a decision in the matter in accordance with law, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, with an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, for which the petitioner shall be present before the 2nd respondent at 11 am on 10.3.2009. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks