IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27447 of 2010 HEM RAJ SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Part of Saw machine and part of diesel engine along with two pieces of Shisham log and two pieces of Babul log are recovered. The submission of learned counsel is that seized articles may never justify running of Saw Mill but if that is accepted then also liability upon the petitioner can be fixed for running of Saw Mill without licence may never justify refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Complaint Case No. 10 (05) of 2005, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)