^S^-<ll'41CI';f, Wlll'M'IS, fs«11-Hy,< *n*wn fl»*ii<h •TI^200 an^r qn R;'ii+ 'tWT Slf^V StlXI'B <ffl^?T 'TW? (1P^^<;T) ?wi«tR•(t^fl sn^T HIuH COURT OF' CHHAT-TISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETJTION (AB PETITIOW tTSBE.R ASTICLE PETTTIONBR:. PLAINTIFF fiBSPONDBNTS DEFENDANTS Surendr^, S/o. Alakii Ram Devangan, aged about 36 vearh, ResidRnt ot Villags Rhanriera, Tahsil r^-"-.--'-"!•: i-^ULlilUl ^fUildud, .L/isi.xJtCL l^'u.i'^ 1,^^ vetsus 1. Alakli Kafa, B/o. Visnal Uevangan, agect about &U vea-rps '2.. Neera Bal vears 3< Siismc L?^i, Vv/o Alsl^ii R&m Dcvsng3ii^ ci.gcd s-Isout 5.3 years 4, Johru Ra4n? S/r)° Alakh Ra-m Devajigaji, a.ged about ^o ycy.io 5. Uinesn, vftars IAII resid T^^-wf^^^ ^^/^ DUirencu'a Blisara, J. Ivlr. visiiuu Kosula, COLUIS J.l.t.^UUB, wliereDy ttie leamect 14 (3) and Oi-der 14 Rule 5 (2) ^tI^hfT^ft'l 'RFI^F ^ fel3i' <^If^i< ^ SiRPT 311^1 TICLE 227} N0. 2563/2008 27 OF THE CQHSTITUTIQN OF ISDIA -~.i":-" r^-=+•—.-'+r^-!T"-7 //~<r^^ , Wcl/o. Vishal Uevangan, agect about 80 /o. Alakh Ram Devangan, aged about 19 pnt ol Village Btiandera, 'ratisU Uouncli I^ihara, r^iatrict-niirg (CG) Chhattisgarh, through CoUector Durg, District D|urg (CGj 7. Smt. Siilnitra Bai, n./o. Vishal W./o. Milan t7J11^,-*— T^-.+^*,^ T^^U~;1 r^^^-^^1; T ^Un^^ L/cvcuigcuij, vUlcigt; i\.ui.d'a., iciil»U i^iJUiiUi LAjiicu'ci, Uistnct, tfurg (L;U) ORAfc ORDBR F"UO-AWO ••i lor lue pcuuoiicr. HeaiTd. 'l Jiis petition is directed a^amst the order of Auuexure P-6, dated lm Civil Juage, Class-11, Balod,Uistt. Uurg, lias rejected t&e appUcati<t>n ol Uie petiUoner uncler Orcler 7 Kule ofthe C.P.C. for permission to adduce (». addltional dociunent and deletfug issue No.9. Tlie Court below has sjTff^T ^T^T fKOTTc^, ff3Rt^ri? —FS/)97—3/2008 —40,000. "€ C—78 T=f '<ii<ii<i<i, ynl'H'Ko, f«4dl'y^< HWW ((,^|q)—••—•"—•"— ••—-•••"-^^ 200 3II^TTra?7 (11pf35I^I) sf^sw R-fi'k WT SIT^T a»*i s ^^. TOiiw^ffiaan^i -2 reiecteu tfle appucation tor "KBI tTistiKa' m evidence wiUt Uif not a pubJic docuiuent aucl alscj issue No.9 on fhe ground that partiuon, t&e suit tor aeclaration not be adjudicated. Leanied counsel for fhe uie puDUc clocT.unen.t anct, tlieret(] evideuce ana Uie issue no.y is tlie issue No. l &, ..i, already tramep Atter lieanng Stai Koslita, atter gouig ttu-ough tlie unpugnecl lUegqlity, uitirDiity or junsclicuon^ wtucn. inay occasion taillire ot petitioner wan-aiitiag uiterterenc^ ArUcle '£2.t ol ttie (jonstituuon ot ^etttion is accoramgly aisnys pertpission smts ^)l«<t<rTtftl'RW?ff ^f "fe^ <P>1^.1< ^aifinaiit?! TO aaauee aoianzea copy ot observatiou ttiat the 'Ria Pustika' is rejected ttie prayer for deletiiig fhe Iwithout deciding the legaUly of the ^nd tifle aud perpetual mjunction can pquuoner suunuts tliat 'Kui i-^isUKa' is |re, notanzed. copy could De taKen on sujperUuous as t&e same is coverea wim Dy Uae tnal Court. teaniea counsel tor ttie petitioner aud. order, I am. satistied ffaat tiiere is no ^l error comiiutted by Uie Court Delow liusuce • or niaiutest ui]usuce to Uie ui tlie exercise ot junsaicUon i.uicler India. ised at ttie aclinissiou sta^e itsett. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge