IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT APPEAL NO : 177 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 14/02/2008 in WP NO : 2945 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 K.Poornamma W/o.Prasada Rao Resident of 25/1-574, Z.P. Colony, 3rd Cross Road, Nellore, Nellore District. 2 P.Balaram S/o.Venkaiah R/o.42-1-142(1), K P Road E K Kammapalem, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 Y.Koteswara Rao S/o.Umamaheswara Rao District Hospital, Khammam. 4 K.Kusuma Kumari W/o.Narasimha Murthy R/o.9-4/43, Old Bridge Road Srikakulam. 5 M.Abbas S/o. M S Hussain R/o.S-7, 2nd floor, Suvida Enclave, Savitri Nagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 6 S Hussain S/o. A Hussain R/o. Canal Road, Razole, East Godavari District. 7 N.Kumara Swamy S/o.N.Vishnu Murthy R/o.10-7-10, Ramachandrapuram village, Rama Durga Veedhi, East Godavari District. 8 A S S V Rama Krishna S/o.Appa Rao R/o. Near Govt. Hospital Street, D.No.9-132, Prathipadu, East Godavari District. 9 M/s. Ramasingh Malsingh Rep. by N. Prakash R/o.5-11-260, Pragathi Nagar, Nizamabad. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (M1) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Andhra Pradesh Vaidya Vidhan Parishad, Rep. by its Commissioner, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 3 Director of Medical Education, Sultan Bazar Koti, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.V.R.N.PRASHANTH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per TGK, J) Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ appeal. Permission granted. The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. However, as stated by the learned counsel for the appellants that a representation has already been made to the authorities about the extension of Diet Suppliers Contract, the authorities may consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders uninfluenced by any of the observations made by the learned single Judge in W.P.No. 2945 of 2008. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 27th February, 2008 GRR