JN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’IVI‘ISGARH ' BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2477 of 2004 Petitioner S. N. Singh, Sfq Lats Shri Daroga Singh, Aged about 53 Years, Occupation — Service, Presently posted as Sub Divisional Ofiicer, Electxical,’Mechanical F.O.M. Sub Division, In Water Resources Depaxtment, Bilaspur, R/o 6/743, Goverdhan Bada, ’I‘ilak Nagar, Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secxetaly, Water Resources Department, Mantxalaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Engineer-In-Chief, ‘Nater Resources Deparbnent, Sihawa Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Reselvoir Project, Water Resources Department, Raipur (06%.). 4. The Superintending Engineer, Electrical] Mechanical Circle, Water Resources Deparunent, Railour (C.G.). The Executive Engineer, EIM heavy Earth Moving Division, Water Resources Deparmlent, Bilaspur. Shn' B. B. Shrivastava, Sub Divisional Officer/Assistant Engineer, E/M Nalkoop Gate, Sub Division, Durg (C.G.). og p1 WRIT PFYI‘I’I‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn Rajeev Shnvastava, Advocate for the petmoner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. l to 5. Shri Dinesh R. K. liwan Advocate for the respondent No. 6. o R D E g (Passedon this l 1th Day ofSeptember, 2008) 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks- fqr quashing of the order dated 22.7.2004 (Annexure P/ 17), whereby the additional of Sub Divisional O$cer, Electrical/Mechanical, F.O.M., Sub-Division, Bilaspur was withdrawn from the petitioner and the same Was handed over charge to the post I ‘V , 0 to other Sub—Engineer Shri B. B. Smivastava[Respondent No.6. ’ ‘he question, asto Whether additional Charge can be withdrawn or nOt is in issue. This impugned order was passed in July,’2004. At pmsent What is the status it is not known. Even othexwise, the order was for a temporary period, which must have come to an end. Thus this petition has become infxuctuous. Learned counsel appealing for the Iespondents/ State submits that the petition has become injiuctuOus. In View of the above, the petition is dismissed, as having become iufmctuous. OJ ‘1, Sdl— oui Thaku: Judge