IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3116 of 2010 Decided on 17.6.2010 Kishore Kumar ….Petitioner Versus H.R.T.C. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the Petitioner: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That a writ in the nature of Certiorari may kindly be issued against the respondents by quashing and setting aside the impugned orders Annexures P-2, P-7 and P-8. (ii) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued by directing the respondents to re-engage the petitioner against the post of TMPA with all consequential benefits. (iii) That the respondents may be directed to decide the appeal/representation of the petitioner sympathetically and petitioner may be heard personally while deciding his representation/appeal.” 2. Having heard learned counsel on both the sides, we find that the Appellate Authority has not adverted to the contentions taken by the petitioner while passing the order in appeal. Therefore, we set aside the appeal-order, Annexure P-8. There will be a direction to the Appellate Authority to pass fresh orders in the matter adverting to all the contentions taken by the petitioner. This shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of copy of this judgment. In case, the petitioner wants opportunity for hearing, the same shall also be granted. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. June 17, 2010(K/HL) ( Justice Rajiv Sharma ), Judge