IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 8 of 2001 Between: 1 G.G. Choudary S/o G. Krishnama Naidu R/o. 214, Prakasham Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2 Subbarathnam S/o. Lakshmaiah 4-5-1242, Reservoir Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Tender Notification issued by the respondent in Roc.No.PR 4/26418/Advt.151/2000, dated 22/12/2000, published in the local news papers, as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to law and further declare that when once the respondent accepted the enhanced rent after the expiry of the lease period, it should be treated as unequivocal act referable to the desire of the respondent to assent the petitioners continuing in possession of the premises in question as tenant and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. N.BHARAT BABU for MR.K.UMAPATHY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.A.V.SIVAIAH The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel Sri. N.Bharat Babu, representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri.K.Umapathy, submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 07-06-2005 vs To 1) The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2) 2 CD copies