IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 of 2010 Between Seeta Mahalakshmi … Revision Petitioner V/s. M.Venkat Reddy & 2-Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B. Sairam Goud Counsel for the Respondents: Sri BHR Coudary THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3950 OF 2010 O R D E R : This Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the order dated 20-07-2010 in I.A.No. 94 of 2010 in RC.No.106 of 2007 on the file of 13th Junior Civil Judge-cum-I-Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein for impleading the Housing Board i.e., respondents 2 and 3 herein as parties to the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed. 2. None appears for the Revision Petitioner. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the first respondent. 4. The first respondent herein filed RC.No. 106 of 2007 seeking eviction of the petitioner herein from the schedule premises. According to the first respondent his father was the original owner of the schedule flat, the same having been allotted to him by the Housing Board and it was let-out to the petitioner herein. As the petitioner failed to vacate the premises, petition for eviction was filed in RC.No. 106 of 2007. The petitioner herein contested the said petition inter alia disputing the title of the first respondent and contending that she purchased the schedule premises from the father of the first respondent under registered sale deed. When the matter was coming for enquiry, the petitioner filed I.A.No. 94 of 2010 seeking impleadment of A.P. Housing Board on the ground that she made a representation to the Housing Board for execution of registered sale deed in her favour and the said representation is pending with the Housing Board. It is not disputed that the petitioner filed WP.No. 9388 of 2007 before this Court and by order dated 30-11-2007 this Court directed the Housing Board to consider the representation made by the petitioner. It is not disputed that the Housing Board is the paramount title-holder in respect of the schedule premises. 5. The first respondent claims that his father was allotted the schedule flat by Housing Board. Whereas the petitioner contends that there was no title deed in favour of the first respondent’s father executed by the Housing Board and therefore, she made representation to the Housing Board for execution of registered sale deed in her favour in view of her purchase from the first respondent’s father. Thus according to both parties, the A.P. Housing Board is the original owner and paramount title-holder in respect of the schedule premises. The question as to whether or not denial of title by the petitioner herein is bonafide is a matter to be considered by the learned Rent Controller after evidence is recorded. In-as-much-as the A.P. Housing Board admittedly is paramount title-holder in respect of the schedule premises, it is considered that the A.P. Housing Board is a proper and necessary party to the proceedings. In that view of the matter, the impugned order dismissing the application, I.A.No. 94 of 2010 filed by the petitioner herein for impleadment of the A.P. Housing Board is set aside and the A.P. Housing Board is permitted to be impleaded as party-respondent to R.C.No. 106 of 2007. The learned counsel for the first respondent apprehends that the impleadment of the A.P. Housing Board at this stage while the enquiry is in progress may further lead to delay in disposal of the matter and the petitioner herein has not been paying the rents since 1999. 6. In the light of the said submission and in view of the fact that the matter is of the year 2007, the learned Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. _____________________________ JUSTICE G. V. SEETHAPATHY 24-12-2010 I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3590 OF 2010 CIRCULATION ENTRY No. Date: 24-12-2010 Court Master : I s L Computer No. 43