HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT FETITION <S) No. 3820 of2007 PETITIONER8 RESPONDENT8 : 1. Ku. Cathrina Tigga, Aged about 48 years, Dau^iter of Late Joachim Ti^a, Posted at Bharat Mata Primary School Mudhupara, P.0. Patora, District Ambikapur (C.G.) 2. Ku. Indumati Hdca. Aged about 36 yesas, Daughiter of Shri Paulus Ekka, Posted at Bhatat Mata Primary School Mudhupara, P.0. Patora, District Ainbikapur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, tteou^iSeeretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, Mautralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(Chhattisgarh). 2. Conmussioner, Tribal Wel&re Dq>artmeut, Distoict Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh). 3. Catholic Saastfaan Surguja, Dakshin Parikshfiitra, Bishop's House Ambikapiff, Throu^i Nirdeshak, Bishop's House, Ambikapur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA Slnele Bench: Hon'ble Justfee Shri Satish K. Aamhutri. Present: ShriAnupamDubey, Advocateftu-fliepetitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate fortheSt^e/respondentNo. land2. ORDER (Passed on 4th day of July, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appeara^ for the petitioners suteutytii^.lfae petitioners sae teachers working in Ihe respondent No. 3 Institute. The petitiianera are entitled to grant ofIfae FifBi Pay Commission in the li^at ofthe judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed bv this Court in the case of Snrt. A. LaB Vs. State ofChhatttegarii & Others (W.P. No. 4108 of2005) wifaoflier connected matters. 2. LeamedcounselfiMthersubmitsthatthiscaseissquarelycoveredonfluste as well as on question oflaw by tiie dedsion ofthis Coiirt inihe matter of ^^..^^^^.^^ matters (supra). Learued counsel appearing for 1fae respondents No. 1 and 2/State subnrite thatthe petitioner have not filed aay doaunent indicating asto whelher die petitioners are appointed within the sanctioned post and the school is Govenunent aided. In view ofthat, tiie writ petition is allowed in the same temis passed by tius Coiut in the matter of Smt A. LaH Vs. State of Chhattt%arii & Others and other connected matters (sapra), subject to verfficatimi asto whether Ifae respondent No. 3 Institute is a Govemment aided school and the petitioners are teachers within Ihe sanctionedstrength. SdA , SatistiK.Agnihotri . Judge Amit