HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.3565 OF 2004 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Heeralal Pradhan, S/o Kjshorilal Pradhan, aged about 31 yeare. Muriidhar Patel, S/o Rameshwar Patel, aged about 24 years. Dulamani Pradhan, S/o Hemsager Pradhan, aged about 21 years. Parmanad Sidar, S/o Chain Singh Sidar, aged about 30 years. All resident of village/post - Tolge, Tahsil/Block Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). Ku. Goreti Kujur, D/o Markus Kujur, aged about 26 years, R/o village Matpahad, P.0. Chiknipali, Via - Ludeg. Block Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Aadim Jati. Anusuchit Jati, Pichhada Verg Evam Alpa Sankhyak Kalyan Viyiag, Mantrataya, Raipur (CG). 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Collector, Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh). District Raigarh District Project Co-coordinator, Shiksha Abhiyan, Raigarh. Serv Block Education Officer, Block Lailunga, District Raigarh (CG). Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Lailunga, Dist. Raigarh. Chairman/Prestdent, Panchayat Evam Jan Bhagidari Samittee, Village Tolge, Block Lailunga, Oistrict Raigarh (CG). Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat - Tolge, Block Lailunga, Dist. Raigarh (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri K.N. Nande, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri Arun Sao, counsel for respondent No.5. QF QRBER (Passed on this 13m day of August, 2008) ^L' According to learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the petitioners were working as Janbhagidari Teachers at vitlage Tolge, Tahsil Lailunga, District Raigarh. Respondent No.1 by tetter dated 31-10-2002 (Annxure-P/1) directed the Commissioner, Tribal Weffiare, Raipur, for up-gradation of Panchayat and Janbhagidari schools in the year 2002-03 with a condition that the concemed Panchayat Committee and Janbhagidari Samiti would be responsibte for maintaining the building and payment of salary to the teachers for two years: The petitioners seek a relief that the respondents No.1 to 5 may be restrained from acting on communjcation dated 31-10-2002. 2) The communication dated 31-10-2002 states about ttie maintainjng the bujtding & paying salary to the teachers for minjmum two years. The said period is over. Even otherwise, the petitioners are teachers, how they are concemed with the maintenance of building or payment of salary when theyare being paid salary regulariy. There is no grievance that on account of the communication dated 31-10-2002 their payment of salary has been withheld. Thus, this petition is frivolous and amounts to abuse and misuse ofjudidal process. 3) On a query as to what is the grievances of the petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in fact, the petitioners are not aggrieved, but this communicatton creates instabiltty in Panchayat and Janbhagjdari Samiti. 4) Panchayat and Janbhagidari Samiti have not approached this Court seeking redressel of any grievance. It appears that this case has been fded on behalf of some other persons, if any. Filing of such petitions on behatf of other persons wjthout havjng any grievance must be condemned. 5) In view ofthe foregoing reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. 6) Consequently, all the pending applications stand disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge