IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (0 N0. ^^L' / 2011 PETETIONER: Mahesh Giri S/o Shri S.R. Giri, aged about 57 years, Assistant Engineer Civil, Sub bivisional Officer Department of Water Resources, Balod. Distt. Durg Presently working on the post of Executive Engineer at P.M.G.S.Y. bepartment Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Contemnors VERSUS 1. N.K. Oswal, Secretary/ Principal Secretary Water Resources Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur bistt. Raipuir (C.G.) 2. B.L. Roy, Engineer In-Chief Water Resources bepartment Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Line Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). CONTEMPT PETITCON UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. READ WITH ARrtCLE 2 15 OF CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA A. -.1' 3T?^T ^FT f^7iNT TOTSTT^T^lf^ 'u .1- H(*^IT ^^}^s ^'^T'^I^Kn^, ^Tll^^co, f®l<vil'L|l^< .A.....Au...(cJ.....^/ '// ^T^T 'V^K (Ti?f33F^r) •g^rere-g^ sn^r SB: Hon'ble fVlr. Justice IManlndra Mohan Shnvastava ^N^RN ^n^if ^ fe ^ Tfa^$s ^ ^ffifH a^ ' 21.11.2011 Mr. A.S. Rajput, Coun^ei forthe petitioner. Heard. j Learned CQunseS for tjhe petitloner submits that the writ petition filed by the petitionejr was allowed vide order dated 9 of May 2011, in whichjt petitioner has to be countei on adhoc basls and confirmation/reguiarization. As certain typograph passed on 09.05.2011, the vas heid that the senlority of the from the date of his appointment not from the date of his ijsa! mlstake had crept in the order ^ame was modified/corrected vide Learned counsel for representation has been m^ of the Court has not beei) correct gradation list has no( The order passe^ has not been prescrlbed fe^i another common order datejd 12.09.201 1 passed.jn MCC Nos. 612/2011and613/2011. he petitioner submlts that though de by the petitioner, but the order compiied wlth till date and the been issued. eariier on 09.05.2011 was modified/corrected on 12.0^.2011 . Though speclfic time iimit compliance of the order, but ths ^T^T^—I'S/140—2/20 ^ i —1,50,000. J. ./^ / &t^ Ti £? '•%&. ' ^ •^&ti. '^a^ 14. "S ^' 3^i ^r fe.^r<^ WT3TT^[^lt^ 'nr ^ ^ ^pwff^^l^ ?^T -^l'MKrl^, ^Ti1<-f4l<o, fsRTRTp; ^.^.........6^....C1-..^^ ^f^T ^W (^f^^?) ^pnw^rft^ ^T^T order of the Court is requ publlcation of senlority iist, the respondents. Respond cb(^i<rt4)'1 'RnH^ff ^ fe f. TfN^K ^3tftP;T3?^': ed to be complled with withln a reasonabie time. Taking into consider^tlon the nature of exercise j.e. am not incllned to issue notice to fent No.2 who is said to be the competent authority in the matter of Issuance of gradation iist shall be under obiigatlon tp show correct piacement of the petitioner as and when corrfect gradation !ist is sssued. In case any promotion is propos^d by hoiding D.P.C., it wi!i be ob!igatory on the part of th|e respondents to first publish the correct gradation list in |comp!iance of the order dated 09.05.2011 (modified/corre4ted on 12.09.2011) passed bythis Court and if it is found that of the fact that no time iimit [undue advantage has been taken |ias been prescribed, action wili be taken against the erring res|3ondents. With the above obse|'vatlons, the petition stands flnaiSy disposed of. (^ Sd/" Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava Judge -J.. ^r" ^7rTtTi<?^, :(i^r^pi—?.'s/i40-—2/2(jt s—1,50,000,