IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16768 of 2009 1. SUMITRA DEVI @ SUMITRA KUMARI W/O UMESH PRASAD R/O VILL VAGESHWARI ANCHAL SIRDALA, P.S.SIRDALA, DISTT- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY WELFARE DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR , WELFARE MAGADH DIVISION GAYA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, WELFARE MAGADH DIVISION GAYA 4. THE COMMISSIONER CUM ACTIVE OFFICER PUBLIC COMPLAIN- CELL MAGADH DIVISION, GAYA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRAE NAWADA 6. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR , LAND REFORMS NAWADA 7. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER SIRDALA, NAWADA 8. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT FOLLOWING WITHIN SRIDALA CIRCLE OF DISTT- NAWADA ----------- 2. 22.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, an Anganwari Sevika was terminated. After an enquiry she was reinstated on 29.12.2008. She is now aggrieved by the fresh order of termination dated 9.6.2009 communicated on 19.8.2009. Learned counsel submits that the fresh order of termination dated 9.6.2009 was ex parte, without any show cause notice and does not adequately deal with the previous order of reinstatement after enquiry dated 29.12.2008. Learned counsel for the State from the recitals in the impugned order is unable to demonstrate that the earlier order of reinstatement has been adequately considered or that it was based on subsequent events or that the petitioner was heard before issuance of the same. The order dated 9.6.2009 is set aside. The matter 2 is remanded to the District Programme Officer who may proceed afresh in accordance with law after issuance of an appropriate show cause notice, when any fresh adverse order shall necessarily be required to adequately deal with the order dated 29.12.2008, stated to have been made after enquiry. The application stands allowed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)