IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11465 of 2009 RANJIT DHARHI @ RANJIT KUMAR SON OF BHOLA DHARHI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MURARPUR,P.S.KORMA,DISTT.SHEIKHPURA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 30.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered against 10-12 unknown dacoits for offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code regarding theft of house hold articles, ornaments and cash. In course of investigation, one new dhoti, one blouse piece and other articles were recovered from the house of the petitioner. The said dhoti and blouse piece were identified in the test identification parade by the informant to be the looted articles from his house. Impugned order mentions that in paragraph 100 the criminal antecedent of the petitioner has been given. Submission is that the dhoti and blouse piece have been released in favour of the petitioner because they were his own. Regarding criminal antecedent, it is stated that there is one another case against the petitioner in which he is on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Sheikhpura in Sheikhpura P.S.Case No. 253 of 2006. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)