IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7400 of 2010 MD.MAINUL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Jaipuriyar, learned counsel for the informant as also Mr. B. K. Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as a matter of fact, there is no eye witness of actual occurrence and petitioner was not present at the alleged place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the State and also the informant have strongly opposed the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and submitted that it is a case of cold blooded murder. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not persuaded to accede to prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six weeks from today and makes prayer for regular bail, then the same should be considered on its own merit 2 without being prejudiced by the present order. While considering the prayer, the learned court below may consider all other pleas raised on behalf of the petitioner and may also consider other materials produced by the party for the purpose of bail. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)