1 26 caf.686.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 686 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Amrish h/f Mr. V.S.Talkute for the Applicants. Mr. Pradeep Gole for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13 th September, 2011. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants seeks time to file rejoinder. Time cannot be granted. 2 The Applicants are the unsuccessful Plaintiffs. The suit for specific performance of agreement for sale of the suit property has been dismissed by the impugned decree. During the pendency of the suit, there was limited interim injunction granted on 28 th November, 2006. Now the finding of the trial Court is that the Respondent is in possession. Therefore, interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) cannot be 2 26 caf.686.11 granted. However, the interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) will have to be granted. 3 Accordingly, the application is disposed of by passing the following order: “Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).” [ A.S.OKA, J ]