IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33914 of 2011 Vir Bahadur Singh @ Lakki Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 14.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report with direction allegation of making fire upon the deceased and the aforesaid fact has not only been supported by the informant but also some other witnesses whose statements have been recorded at paras 59, 60 and 61 of the case diary. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation, some independent witnesses very clearly stated before the Investigating officer that they had not seen the petitioner and others on the place of the occurrence at the relevant time and apart from this, annexure 2 series to this petition reveals that petitioner was under treatment on the alleged date of the occurrence but I am not at all convinced with the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case no. 87/2008 corresponding to Sessions Trial no. 2/2009/58/2011 pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No.II, Kaimur at Bhabua is, hereby, rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)