IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6544 of 2006 SATYA NARAYAN THAKUR, S/o Late Raghupati Thakur, Resident of Village – Madhopur Diara, P.O. – Madhopur, P.S. – Shahpur, District – Patna ............ Petitioner Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employee’s Provident fund Organization, Serpentine Road, R. Block, Patna, Bihar. 2. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Regional Office, Employee’s Provident Fund Organization, Serpentine Road, R. Block, Patna, Bihar. ........... Respondents ----------- 4 08.03.2011 Today again, on call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Yesterday also none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner whereas learned counsel for respondent / Regional Provident Fund Commissioner was present. Today again, Sri Ravi Bhushan Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent / Regional Provident Fund Commissioner is present. It was submitted by Sri Verma, that during the pendency of the writ petition, grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. Petition stands dismissed due to non- prosecution. Praful /- (Rakesh Kumar, J.)