:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2572 OF 2005 Mohammed Idris Farooq Khan ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.M.S. Ahmad, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 3rd May 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. I see no reason to show indulgence to the present Applicant in view of the evidence on record to indicate complicity of the Applicant in the commission of the crime. The complainant has deposed about the role of the Applicant, which fact is corroborated by two independent witnesses. The Applicant has threatened the :2: witnesses not to chase him and also shown revolver to witnesses which fact is stated in the complaint. In view of this material on record, and seriousness of the offence, not a case for bail. Rejected. . As prayer for bail is rejected, the Principal Judge of the Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai, is directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, if not already done, in order to ensure early disposal of the trial. If the Fast Track Court is not available for any reason, the trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the trial and dispose of the same as High Court Expedited Case. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)