z mm Wt zoo mwr(Wu) WWW WWW WW§MW $WW€¥I 13ingle Bench; Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P. (s) No.5392l2008 (Petition U/A 226 of Constitution of India) PETITIONER Mahavir Raisagar, aged about 38 years, S/o Shri Osram Fiaisagar, Post Sasha, Tehsil Pamgarh, District J2 njgir—Champa (CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat & Social RESPONDENTS Welfare Department, Mantraiay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Coilector, - Chhaitisgarh. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. Gram; Panchayat Bundela, Through: Secretary, Gram Panchayat Bundela, Tehsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) District Janjgir-Champa, Present: Mr. D.K. Wankhede, Adv. forthe petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Ad locate General for the State. 30.09.2008 By this petition the petitioner is challenging the impugned orders dated 12.11.1999 & 3.11.2001 passed by respondent No.2 & 3, whereby services of the petitioner, who was working as Gurji under the Education Guarantee Scheme, has been discontinued, on the ground that the same has been passed without giving proper oppor unity and without issuing any show cause l l notice to the petitioner. Wm m 200 mm (Wu) WWW“ Z Learned counsel for the pet bunch of petitions were decided i: passed in W.P. No.4562/01 whereb: to petitioners of those petitions to make representation before the concerned ity was directed to consider their case for ha l Karmi. He further submits that this petition may also be disposed representation to the concerned a directed to consider the case of t Karmi Grade-III in accordance with i On the other hand, learned ct objection if the petition is disposed c In view of the above submission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation along with copy of tr is order before the'c’ompetent authority for appointment as Shiksha Karmi Grade-Ill and on such representation being made, the competent authority sha expeditiously. Certified copy as per rules. ‘ Dhirendra Mis ‘ Judge WWW ammm' WW‘§%€1W $31‘fau3niw k authority and the concerned author “appointment on the post of Shiks Sd/— with liberty to the petitioner to make uthority and the concerned authority be 1e petitioner for appointment as Shiksha bw. >unsel for the State submits that he has no lf in the aforesaid terms. d tioners submits that in the similar matter y this Court vide order dated 29.8.2006 rthe petitions were disposed of with liberty l decide the same in accordance with law h