IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27557 of 2008 DR. OM PRAKASH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No.21/2008 for the alleged offences registered under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that the named accused Dr. Pankaj Kumar is alleged to have impersonated himself as petitioner. The only allegation against this petitioner is to the effect that after signing the attendance register, he was found to have gone out. It is submitted that there is no allegation against this petitioner to allow the co-accused Dr. Pankaj Kumar to impersonate him. It is further submitted that said Pankaj Kumar was arrested on the spot. However, later on he was released on bail, which would be evident from the order, as contained in Annexure 2. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, on the other hand, opposes the 2 prayer for bail and submits that it was the petitioner, who was the beneficiary of the said impersonation. Considering the above, it is directed that petitioner Dr. Om Prakash, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No.21/2008, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)