IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31887 of 2011 Mangeshkar Kumar @ Babloo son of late Rama Mahto, resident of village-Beapur, P.S.-Maner, District- Patna Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 20.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act has been taken. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no doubt the petitioner is husband of the complainant but he is doing a private job at Pune in Maharashtra. The complainant does not want to accompany him. She wants to reside at Naihar and insists that the petitioner should also reside with her as “Ghar Jamai” leaving his widow mother. When the petitioner did not accept the said proposal of the complainant, the present case has been filed. It is also submitted that the petitioner has also filed a report in this regard to Mukhiya and Sarpanch with list of documents which shows that though attempt was made to resolve the dispute but due to rigid approach of the complainant and her family members, the matter could not be settled. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, namely, Mangeshkar Kumar @ Babloo in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four 2 weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 492(C) of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)