1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2005 Navnirman Development Consultants (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus The Divisional Commissioner & President, Divisional Sports Complex Executive Committee & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. S.V. Pitre for the Petitioner Mr. N.P. Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondents. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. DATE: 12TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C. 1. Arbitration Clause 3.8 of the Agreement reads as under:- “ Any dispute or differences between the parties as to terms of engagement as Architects as aforesaid shall be decided by arbitration of such panel of arbitrators or individual arbitrator, who shall be members of AESA, fellow of IIA and recognised by Council of Architecture, and such 2 arbitration proceedings shall be governed by the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act in force for the time being.” 2. In view of the said clause, the petitioner has already appointed its Arbitrator. The respondents undertake to appoint their Arbitrator within four weeks. Both the Arbitrators would be at liberty to nominate the Umpire. 3. This application is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE