IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2008 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2008 Mr.Vijesh P. Dalal. ... Applicant. V/s. 1. The State of Maharashtra, 2. Angel Capital and Debt Market Ltd. ... Respondents. Vaibhav Bagade with Narendra Dhanavade for the applicant. S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. Kundan Chauhan, authorised representative of respondent No.2 present in person. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 27th June 2008. DATED: 27th June 2008. DATED: 27th June 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Not on board. Taken up on board by consent of parties. 2. The parties to the revision application have filed consent terms along with resolution of the complainant. The authorised signatory of the complainant is also present in the Court. The consent terms are signed by the applicant as well as by the authorised signatory of the complainant and countersigned by learned counsel for the applicant. The consent terms and the resolution of the complainant are taken on record and marked ‘X’ and ‘X-1’ respectively for identification. 3. In the above view of the matter, offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act stands compounded. Revision stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE