IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18858 of 1991 Date of decision: 23.02.2011 Harbans Singh, Mandi Supervisor, Market Committee, Jagadhri ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana and others ….. RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Randhir Singh, Addl. A.G. Haryana, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Saurav Arora, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. *** RANJAN GOGOI, CJ (Oral) The challenge in the writ petition is against the order of suspension. Not only the petitioner has retired in the meantime but learned counsel for respondent No. 3 has submitted that the period of suspension of the petitioner has been treated to be one on duty. In the above situation, there is no live issue for adjudication in this writ petition. The writ petition is closed as infructuous. ( RANJAN GOGOI ) CHIEF JUSTICE ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE February 23, 2011 pj