SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATEJURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATEJURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATEJURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2427 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2427 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2427 OF 2007 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.18384 OF2007 REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.18384 OF2007 REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.18384 OF2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.3198 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.3198 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.3198 OF 2007 Practive In and Out Advertising Pvt.Ltd...Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, senior counsel with Niranjan Shimpi for applicant. Smt.M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Mr.Santosh Deshpande with J.C.Reddy for respondent No.2. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the parties. Considering the cause shown the delay in preferring the review petition, in our opinion, would amount to sufficient cause. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the review petition. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)