;^...»-^,.,,^;:,eA,.^^. ^^ ) &^_ sm^ F S0 s^^-4. ^ T£) r IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.tSlNO. ^Y^A /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^f^.^' ^0: s' ^.•p'" <^ ^ '^•••" ^' ^ Wakil Ahamad S/o. Shri Shekh Hakim, aged about 38 years, R/o. Ramanujganj, P.S. Ramanujganj, Dist. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretaiy Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department Ambikapur Surguja, Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION, QRDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^^^ .^ss^% l«y 11 '•^^-' J ^ ^-^'^ "^. ^^^ ^i^? ^T fqii<=t» 'OTT ^T^T sh*ii^ ^ ';^TPTRW, ^^R^, t^Tray ^..W...?:..^.K'.At6F.p.°, ^n^T'^^ (^q?^<^?) ^fTW^^<3?H^l ^F^H^IN 'WI^S ^ 'fe^t <r3r!^k ^3t^3?i^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Mlanindra Mohan $1 09-08-2010 Shri Bhupendra Singh along wj petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Adv4 advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing f^ petitioner is entitled to benefit of two he having passed B.TI. examination own cost. It is submitted that the issul no longer res integra and the samej Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Ors., 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. It is also taken a similar view in his W.P.(S)No.6257of2008. Learned attention ofthis Court to order dated No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, consideration of the case for grant oj circulardated 21-09-1974 issued by tlj verifjcation of the facts pleaded in the Learned counsel for the respc petitioner would also be considered on I hrivastava, J. h Shri R. R Singh, counsei for the ?ate for the State/respondents on |>r the petitioner submits that the fedvance increments on account of ibefore entering into service at his involved in the present petition is has been finatly decided by the o^Asha Saxena vs. State ofM.P. & ft|rther submitted that this Court has orjjer dated 06-02-2009 passed in coi|nsel for the petitioher further draws 129-04-2010 passed inWrit Appea! |he judgment of the Supreme Court the order passed by this Court in lirections have been issued for two advance increments as per ^e State of Madhya Pradesh, after rietition. tndents submits that case of the 1 |the same lines. an|d W^^-^^k —FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000. ,y^ :^.%\ '^^^-^; '••^^;.; "--..- '"-r ^il^^lT'f^N? ^TSH^T^^NT Tumane ^~sf ^i'MicrM, ^Til^^i^, l^rray ..^ln^m& ^I^T TI^^ (^f3^?) i^rw^ift^3??^r _r In view of the statement disposed of with a direction to the decide the claim of the petitioner foi per circufar dated 21-09-1974 issu( after verification ofthe facts pleaded weeks from today. 'SFP^feNN TTR^f ^? fe^ ^M^K ^^H3H^T jnade above, this petition is finally rfspondent authorities to consider and grant of two advance increments as issu^d by the State of Madhya Pradesh, |in the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 3?nwgk ^^r g^m^sr, .^^1k —FS/I47—2/201o —i,00,000.