17b. cr appa 964-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 964 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 260 OF 2010 Mohammed Umar Imamali Khan .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms. Indu Verma for the Applicant Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-original accused has been convicted under Section 307 of IPC and sentenced to RI for 10 years. The appeal preferred by him against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicant is seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. She further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. 1 17b. cr appa 964-10.doc 4. The role attributed to the applicant is that he has assaulted the complainant with a big knife. In the incident, the complainant has sustained two stab injuries, one is on the left chest wall and other on the right back. Looking to the nature of injuries, I am not inclined to grant bail at this stage. Hence, the application is rejected. However, hearing of the appeal is expedited and the appeal be placed on final hearing board in the week commencing from 18th October,2010. 5. Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. 6. Ms. Indu Verma be paid fees as per rules. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 17b. cr appa 964-10.doc 3