IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 7808 of 2010 Date of Decision: 3.5.2010. E.H.C. Raj Pal Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 5 only. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents-State. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner is serving as a constable in the Haryana Police. The petitioner has undergone the Lower School Course w.e.f. 15.3.2009 to 11.9.2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having qualified the Lower School Course, his name has not been brought on the promotion list B-I w.e.f. 4.8.2006 on the basis of his seniority. The petitioner relies upon the judgement of this Court dated 22.10.2008 passed in CWP No. 19965 of 2006. Petitioner has also served a legal notice (Annexure P-4) in this regard but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 7808 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 3.5.2010. lucky