THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.15992 of 2010 Dated:07th July, 2010 Between: M.Satya Kumar ….Petitioner and 1. The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District & Ors. …Respondents **** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.15992 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed by M.Satya Kumar with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the interference of respondents 1 to 3 by calling him everyday to the Police Station is arbitrary, capricious and unwarranted. 2. The petitioner married M.V.N.Sailaja-4th respondent on 30.04.1998 at Bapatla Town, Guntur District as per Hindu Rites and Customs. Their marital life did not last long and therefore, they fell apart. The reasons for their felling apart are not required to be detailed with in this writ petition. It is suffice to say that the 4th respondent filed a complaint before the Ongole I Town P.S. against the petitioner. According to the petitioner, Ongole I Town Police has not registered any crime against him. The petitioner issued legal notice to the 4th respondent requesting her to come and join with him to lead marital life. Thereafter, the petitioner filed HMOP under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, for dissolution of the marriage. The 4th respondent entered appearance in the said O.P. and filed counter. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents 1 to 3, without there being any crime against him, have been insisting him to appear before the Women Police Station, Ongole and thereby causing much inconvenience to his official duties. According to the petitioner, he presented a complaint against the 4th respondent alleging that she has been threatening him and thereupon, the Station House Officer, Ongole I Town P.S. made a G.D. entry in that regard. 3. When the Writ Petition came up for admission, learned Asst. Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, on instructions, reported that the complaint presented by the 4th respondent is pending with the Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Ongole and conciliation made between the parties proved to be futile. 4. Such is the statement made by the learned Asst. Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, no direction can be given to the respondents 1 to 3 not to register a case against the petitioner. However, in the event of a case being registered against the petitioner, the Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Ongole, has to conduct the investigation in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. 5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:07th July, 2010. cs THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.15992 of 2010 Dated:07th July, 2010