Crl. Misc. No. M-1044 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-1044 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 6,2011 Bala ....................................................... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ........................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Petitioner had sought directions to respondents No. 1 to 4 to conclude the investigation in FIR No. 383 dated 23.10.2010 registered at Police Station Camp Palwal Dist. Palwal. Counsel for the State, on instructions from Head Constable Kushal, has informed the Court that a compromise has been effected and cancellation report has been prepared for presentation in the trial Court. Complainant has given an affidavit to the police where she has stated that she has Crl. Misc. No. M-1044 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] compromised the matter. Counsel for the petitioner, however, states that he has no instructions from his client that the matter has been compromised. This criminal miscellaneous is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to take her remedy, if so advised, in the trial Court on presentation of challan. 6.5.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE