In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-22533 of 2009 (O&M) Rattan Singh and others ..... Petitioners vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. On 18.8.2009 after recording the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners, notice was issued to the respondent:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners as well as the complainant are close relatives. Civil litigation between them is already pending regarding the division and partition of property. The FIR was lodged with false allegations just to put pressure on the petitioners. No such incident happened. Even otherwise the injuries allegedly suffered by Shayamwati were found to be simple with blunt weapon.” The facts that the petitioners have joined investigation and civil litigation is pending between the parties, are not disputed. The injuries attributed are simple in nature. Be that as it may, without recording any finding on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 18.8.2009 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. 31.8.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge