IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.14449 of 2009 1. SHIBU SOREN, 2. Barki Hembrem, 3. Lakhan Soren, . . . . Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners seek privilege of anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 498(A), 323, 380 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. So far as petitioner no.1, Shibu Soren, is concerned learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application. Application filed on behalf of petitioner no.1 is permitted to be withdrawn. Petitioners no. 2 and 3 are mother-in-law and father-in-law and they are sought to be made accused on the strength of a complaint. Looking to the allegations contained therein, this court is persuaded to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender within three weeks from today petitioners, above named, namely petitioners no.2 and 3, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1222 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Uday/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)