1 ABA 35-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2011 Abdul Yakoob alias Naushad ..Applicant Yakoob P.K. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.A.A.Mirza, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent  State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 19TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a driver, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.342 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Goregaon (E) Police Station, Goregaon. He allegedly ran away with a car and the money 2 ABA 35-2011 collected from the customers of the Company. Report was given by Amit Parsekar, another employee of the Company who was supposed to be in the car and an offence was registered. Now, the employer of the applicant Mr. Jigar Mahendra Shah himself wrote to the police way back on 11 th December, 2010 that the driver had come to him and stated that he had to go home as his wife was serious and handed over collected money to him and therefore, could not report on 26th November, 2010. The learned APP upon instructions from Arun Khopkar, PSI, who is present in Court today states that the investigation reveals that money has been received back but police do not know as to what was the amount which received back and now this should not be entrusted to the police. Since it is not stated that Jigar Shah had not withdrawn the complaint, there is no point in seeking custody of the applicant. 3. In view of this, in the event of 3 ABA 35-2011 arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.10,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.10,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Goregaon (E) Police Station, Goregaon for interrogation on 24 th January, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2 nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 4 ABA 35-2011 4. Criminal Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)