K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1748 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.768 OF 2005 The CIT Mumbai City-20 ..Appellant Versus Shri Jaigopal Kabra ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.3.2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 408 days delay in filing the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support, indicates that the Chief CIT granted approval for filing appeal on 29.4.2004 but the appeal thereafter came to be filed on 16.6.2005. No dates have been given in respect of the events which occured between the aforesaid period. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.768 OF 2005 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)