/fjla‘o/Lq , W P (C) N. . . o H / IN THE HIGH COUT R OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR <Q3 0. $ OF 201 L/ PR ETITIONE D Sh y h d y ent o Pyanka Gorakh , / r1 /o r1 Sham Sunder Gorak age about 18 ears Res1d f Jl Ch p D B ) agma owk Bllasur 1strlct 11aspur (C. G. E RSHU ae of attlsar Throug The Secretar eartment of Sched n ceuled Tr1bes Develomen epartment D ._ Hh Ll Cste Scrutmy _ lg eve a C y ommlttee Dlndayal Upadhya agar alpur D1stt Ralpur C G) /’ L ‘ SbDiii .) a \B )L. u—vsonal Magistrate ‘(Rev ilaspur? District Bilaspur (C.GV.> IT PTITONER EIUND' AzIc‘LE iT 2‘ 26 O'T EVHE C ‘ smLE‘BENc V VL s; - Stt Chhgh h y V Dp uled Castes ad Shd pt D KS._Bhawan, aipur ; G. R (c ) \ ' RONDNTS ‘ESPE‘ N R ( (3f Pnyanka Gorakh V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO 5843 OF 2010 ‘ Petitioner Versus Respondenh State of Chhathsgarh & Others . WRIT PETITION UNDER ART!CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB I-Ion'ble Mr Satlsh K Agmhotn, J) ' Present :- Shri Ajaya Kumar Barik, AdVOcate forthe petitioner; r Shri Shashank Thakur Panel Lawyer for the State. RDER ORAL r ‘ 01 day of December 2010) (Passed on 1WP (S) No.3338 of’2007 (decided on 19-8—2010) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, Ieamed counsel appearing for the State submits 4., that the order passed by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagon’a v. l ’ State of Chhattisgam and others’ and otherconnected matters has not been complied with by the respondent authorities in its letter 2 and spirit, thus the matter may be remitted back‘ for reconsideration. In viewof foregoing, the respondent authorities are directed to reconsider the matter afresh in the light of above-stated judgment and order passed by this Court within a period of 15 days. \ 4. In the meantime, the petitioner is at liberty’to produce all other relevant documents, if so required within a period of one week. 5. ' Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. l J l ‘Sd/- l Satish K. Agnihotri’ , Judge ashok