IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8084 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- EKLERA CHINA CLAY WORKS THRO' PARTNER DILIP KRISHNALAL PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PK JANI for Petitioner Mr. IM Pandya AGP for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 12/10/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned advocate Mr. Jani is appearing for the petitioner. Learned AGP Mr. Pandya is appearing for the respondent authorities. Today, learned advocate Mr. Jani has requested before this Court for calling the papers of this petition as he wanted to withdraw this petition. Considering his request, the papers were called and the matter has been taken up today. This petition was admitted by this court on 9th August, 2000 and by way of interim order, the revisional authority was directed to dispose of the revision application as expeditiously as possible,preferably within six weeks. In pursuance to the orders passed by this court, the revisional authority,by order dated 5th October, 2000, has allowed the revision application and the impugned order dated 20th January, 2000 has been set aside by the revisional authority. Learned advocate Mr.Jani has produced copy of the said order dated 5th October, 2000 before this court which is ordered to be taken on record of this petition. In view of the said order passed by the Secretary (Appeals) Revenue Department, learned advocate for the petitioner has sought leave to withdraw this petition. Leave to withdraw this petition is granted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. Direct Service today. 12.10.2000. (H.K. Rathod,J.) Vyas