IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24516 of 2008 YOGENDRA PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.7.2008 Heard. The petitioner is in custody because no Pairvi could be made for him on two days as appearing from the rejection order. The learned Judge has to justify his rejection order by stating that the court had taken steps for procuring the attendance of the I.O. and the doctor and in the meantime the petitioner jumped his bail. The learned Judge has not mentioned that on the date on which the petitioner Pairvi was not made, there was any witness in the attendance. This could not be the manner to dismiss the prayer for bail in such a case of misuse of two dates. Our country have no routine in our day to day life nor we are trained as the Judge is expecting one to be and a court should not lose sight of the facts, that circumstances could be difficult in the lives of the accused persons as well if there could be difficulty in the life of a Judge also. Regard being had to the period of misuse and the fact that the petitioner surrendered him to the custody of the court, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.F.T.C.4, Samastipur in S.Tr.no.443 of 2004/72 of 2006(Patori P.S.Case no.54 of 1999). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )