1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 829 of 2011 1. Sonu, S/o Tularam 2. Satendra Kumar, S/o Amarpal Singh Both Village Ratangarh Police Station Shivala District Bijnore Presently R/o Village Brahampuri Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar …..…Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Senior Superintendent of Police, Pauri Garhwal 2. Station Office, Police Station Ranipur District Haridwar 3. Shri Amar Chand S/o Shri Mahesh Chand R/o Village Egholi, P.S. Ghatampur District Kanpur Presently R/o Village Brahampuri Police Station Ranipur District Haridwar ……….Respondents Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A., present for the State. Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this writ petition moved under 2 Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report no. 265 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 323, 452, 504 IPC, Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar. 3. Factual pleas of defence are raised in the writ petition as to the innocence of the petitioner. It is pleaded that they were not named in the FIR. It is also pleaded that ` 15,000/- were paid by the complainant to the co-accused Sonu, and in order to avoid the demand of said money the FIR is lodged. 4. In its writ jurisdiction, this Court is not inclined to examine the factual aspects which are subject matter of investigation. 5. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners Sonu, S/o Tularam and Satendra Kumar S/o Amarpal Singh surrender before the court concerned their bail application shall be heard, and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay application no. 10019 of 2011, stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 22.09.2011