IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 1096 of 2006(T) -------------------------------- [AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN O.P.NO.6042/2002 DATED 21/06/2006] .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 IN THE O.P: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION (K) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT ANNEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR, P.O.KANNUR. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PAPPINISSERY P.O., PAPPINISSERY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 5TH RESPONDENT IN THE O.P: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. P.K.SUKUMARI, AGED 41 YEARS, W/O.VALSALAN, NEEDLE WORK TEACHER, KOTTAKKUNNU UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KATTAMPALLY P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGER, KOTTAKKUNNU UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, KATTAMPALLY P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.MOHANAN, SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.K.E.HAMZA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.NO.1096/2006-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURE: ANNEXURE I: A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO. 2269/04 DTD. 24/06/2005. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.1096/2006 in O.P. No. 6042/2002 - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of June, 2011. JUDGMENT The review petitioners are respondents 1 to 4 in the writ petition. This Court disposed of the writ petition by judgment dated 21.6.2006 in the light of the direction issued in the judgment in O.P. No.18097/1994. 2. In the review petition, it is pointed out that the judgment in O.P.No.18097/1994 was the subject matter of appeal in W.A. No.2269/2004 and the Writ Appeal was allowed as per Annexure A1 judgment. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. In the light of the decision of the Division Bench in Annexure A1 judgment, the direction issued in the impugned judgment cannot survive. Therefore, the Review Petition is allowed. The writ petition will be posted for further hearing. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/