IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2216 of 2011 SUKHARI MAHATO & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2 07.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state as also the counsel appearing for Union of India. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Kangali P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 registered under sections-20, 22 & 23 of the NDPS Act. Allegedly, petitioners alongwith one co-accused, were intercepted by the informant and other officials and 60 kg Ganja was recovered from their conscious possession. It is stated that 20 kg. each Ganja was recovered from possession of each of the petitioners. Although learned counsel for the petitioners tried his best to convince me about the innocence of the petitioner by placing the forwarding report as well as seizure list but I am not at all convinced with the above-said submissions. Considering the quantity of recovery from possessions of each of the petitioners, I am not inclined to release them on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)