In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 2335 of 1990 (O&M) The State of Punjab and another ... Appellants vs Bachint Singh and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. R. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal J. The State of Punjab is in appeal appeal before this Court against the award passed by learned court below seeking reduction in the amount of compensation awarded for the superstructures. Briefly, the facts are that State of Punjab vide notification dated 26.11.1982 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquired land situated within the revenue estate of village Nangal, Tehsil and District Ropar, for SYL Canal. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the compensation. Aggrieved against the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections which were referred to the learned Court below for consideration, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, awarded compensation on account of severance along with other benefits under the Act. It is this award which is impugned by the State before this court. A perusal of the paper-book shows that dispute sought to be raised by the appellant in the present appeal is merely for ` 8,881.73 paise and the acquisition having taken place more than 28 years back, I do not deem it appropriate to interfere at this stage. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 10.8.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge