IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2011 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 8406 of 2011(A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SADANANDAN, S/O. RAMAN, POONATHIL HOUSE, EDATHIRUTHY VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KATTOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KATTOOR.P.O., IRINJALAKUDA VIA.PIN- 680 702 2. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF KATTOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KATTOOR REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PANCHAYATH.PIN-680 702 3. KATTOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KATTOOR.P.O., PIN-680 702 R1 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.U.SANGEETH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts 2/- -2- WP(C)NO.8406/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYAT DATED 27/10/1997 P2 COPY OF THE EVIDENCING THE PRESENT LIE OF THE STRUCTURE P3 COPY OF THE BILL EVIDENCING THE ALLOTMENT OF NEW NUMBER P4 COPY OF THE ELECTRICITY BILL P5 COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26/6/2010. P6 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE OMBUDSMAN. P7 COPY OF THE ORDER REJECTING THE BUILDING PERMIT. P8 COPY OF THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P9 COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.8406 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering Ext.P5 application submitted by him for numbering the building constructed in Sy.No.404/4 of Kattoor village. Ext.P5 is dated 26.6.2010. It is still pending before the first respondent. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. Considering the fact that Ext.P5 dated 26.6.2010 is still pending consideration before the first respondent, without making any observation as to the claims and contentions of the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P5 application and pass orders thereon expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, in case no orders have been passed thereon. The petitioner shall also be afforded with an opportunity of being heard before passing orders on Ext.P5. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO. 2 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO. 3