FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3224 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3224 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3224 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.Sachin Thombre for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik APP for the respondent-State. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. DATED: 13.10.2008 DATED: 13.10.2008 DATED: 13.10.2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.Thombre, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Yagnik, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has prayed for bail in C.R.No.29 of 2007 of Vishrantwadi police station. The said crime has been registered for an offence punishable under sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149, 349, 342 and 364 of IPC. This is a case of circumstantial evidence. The circumstances relied upon by the police are last seen together, blood stained clothes of the applicant, motive, recovery of weapon at the instance of the applicant and C.A. report. All these circumstances, in my opinion, at this stage are sufficient to connect the applicant with the alleged offence. The blood found on the clothes of the accused and the sickle, recovered at the instance of accused, match with the blood group of the deceased. Prima facie I am satisfied that this is not a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Hence the application is rejected. Having regard to the fact that the applicant is in custody since last more than one and half years the trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the case expeditiously. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)