Crl. Misc. No. M-37589 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-37589 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.2.2011 Karamjit Singh @ Bubby ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. APS Shergil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under Section 392 IPC and Section 25/25(54)/59 of Arms Act at Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula, vide FIR No.370 dated 12th August, 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner was arrested on 10th August, 2010 and is in custody since then. He is, thus, entitled to concession of bail as trial may take long time to conclude. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case. FIR was lodged by one Sandeep, who stated that he was present at his wine shop on 12th August, 2009 at about 4 o'clock. At that time, two young men came on a Splendor motorcycle of blue and silver colour. After parking the motorcycle in front of the shop, they went Crl. Misc. No. M-37589 of 2010 towards the complainant and said that they wanted to check the wine shop. When the complainant took out his mobile to ring up his employer, one of the accused pulled out a pistol and put the same on his temple and the other person looted the money from the chest which was about 20-25,000/- rupees. Both of them thereafter fled away on their motor cycle. The petitioner also moved the bail application before the trial court, but the same was dismissed on 8th December, 2010 by observing that evidence of material witnesses is yet to be recorded and co-accused was absconding. In view of the nature of allegations contained in the FIR, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the possibility of his influencing the prosecution witnesses cannot be ruled out. I am, thus, of the considered view that the petition is without any merit. The same is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 21.2.2011 'rajpal'