IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.881 of 2011 Between: Kanithi Govinda Raju ..... PETITIONER AND Yerravarapu Suryanarayana and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.881 of 2011 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff against the order in I.A.694/2010 in O.S.463/2009 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka. The said I.A. was filed by the respondents/defendants to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property and the same was allowed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of appointing Advocate-Commissioner to note down the physical features is illegal and the same is filed only to gather evidence. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order in appointing Advocate-Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property even in the suit of the petitioner/plaintiff, as there is no bar in appointing Advocate- Commissioner even in an injunction suit. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 25.03.2011 Dsr