1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1760 & 1761 BOTH OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL (st) NO. 7022/2011 (Ptritesh Thakkar and another vs. Pravin Lakhotia ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M P Karia, Adv. for appellants/applicants CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI,J. DATED : 20th September,2011. Heard. The counsel for respondent is absent though served. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that good and sufficient reasons exist for condoning the delay. Hence delay of 83 days in filing the Appeal, is condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of its prayer (1) and disposed of. C.A. NO.1761/2011: Learned counsel for the applicants states that there is a possession warrant at the door of the applicants. Hence, ad- interim stay in terms of prayer clause (1) of the Civil Application. JUDGE sahare