THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 1824 of 2008 ORDER: (Per T. Meena Kumari, J) The present Writ Appeal is filed challenging the orders of the learned Single Judge in W.P.M.P.No.7107 of 2008 in W.P.No. 26673 of 2005, dated 28.8.2008. Before the learned Single Judge, the petitioner has filed W.P.M.P.No. 7107 of 2008 praying to dismiss the Writ Petition No. 26673 of 2005 as infructuous on the ground that the Writ Petition has expired by afflux of time and the Writ Petition would not survive and accordingly it has become infructuous and prayed to dismiss the said writ petition as infructuous. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the learned Single Judge has dismissed W.P.M.P.No. 7107 of 2008 on the ground that the matters requires consideration and directed to post the W.P.M.P. along with main Writ Petition. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. On perusal of the order under challenge, it is crystal clear that the matter requires consideration and filing of the petition by the appellant itself is not maintainable and hence the Writ Appeal is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed. Under these circumstances, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J _______________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27.1.2009 CHV