1 c^ ^^.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l W.P.fSlNo. yl>'c^~y\ /2011 PETITIONER /Laxmi Narayan Sahu, S/o. Shyam Lal Sahu, aged about 33 years, R/o. ViUage - Sarhar, TahsU - Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Charapa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS & ,^Y%> ^q^c<^i .^^xy i^^°\y /^'^y y^y ci li?. f^y '<y ^ (1)^ State of CUhattisgarh through its Secretary, General Administration and Public Grievance Reddresal Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) (2) /'Zila Panchayat Jartjgir, through Chief Executive Officer, Distt. 85 TahsU - Janjgir (C.G.j (3) ^^^ila Paachayat Korba, through Chief Executive Ofiicer, Distt. & Tahsil - Korba (C.G.) (4)^^'Collector, Janjgir, District and TahsU - Janjgir (C.G.) (5)/^Collector, Korba, District and Tahsil - Korba (C.G.) (6) ^ Chief Executive OfHcer, Janpad Panchayat, Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) (Tj^Project Officer, Zila Panchayat, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ••)—F'P ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA § XI-HC—78 sn^v w Ki-(i°h 'aman^wnN; --t- 's^ '^wiv\<i, »Tily'i<o, [s«ni-Liy ...to.£©..WD..'...3.s.?.L//. sn^T'1^^' (' TOiiwnftg aii^a sB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Moh4n Shrivastava, J. 29-06-2011 counsei petitionler consiaelration petftioner (Anne^ure Shri Gautam Khetrapai, Shri Sushii Dubey, Governn^ 1, 4, 5 and 7 on advance copy. ne gnevance OT tne petitionl the petitioner is entitted for basis as the petitioner is the young^ Learned counse! for the by the petitioner, the State Gov^ memo dated 4/5/2010 to take ne( vide its ietter 23/06/2010 Officer, Jlia Panchayat, Janjgir to| maKing neeessary enquiry and another ietter was issued from v\ ('Annexure P/7) to the Chief submits that the Jila Panchayat, Kij Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kartal^ per rules but tilt date, no decision laKing into consiaeration, uoiiector nas aireaay issuea a Chief Executive Officer to considel and that the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, i<artai| per ruies, it wouid be expedieni I trle txeciltive hbs meifto OfFiter ^il'ql^iltl 'RTR^h' ^f t^^t TFal^U ^? siRiii sn^B sei for the petitioner. ent Advocate tor the State/responaents n|er as projected in the writ petition is that of appoiniment on compassionate !^r Drotner®%a'ex-armyserviceman. suDmits tnat on application maae '^rnment directed the Collector vide its it;essary steps whereafter, the Coliector P/6) directed the Chief Executive lconsider the claim of the Detitioner bv t^ke appropriate action and thereafter, ofrice of the Coiiector on 5/07/2010 Ofricer, Jila Panchayat, Korba. He >rba in turn, directed the Chief Executive to consider the case of the Detitioner as been taKen. [the submissions made and that ihe on 23/6/2010 and on 3/07/2010to the the case of the petitioner as per rules in turn direeted the Chtef Executive to consider petitioner's candidature as direct respondent Np.S/CEO, Janpad .<'BSf:^fc-: /?^\ ^sgggS^, f il- s^r -^ww^, ®Ti1y'i<o,fsjdiy^i lA;)f(^)w5 .Jb3:9l/^ siR^i'cra?T (' awi ^il R-ii'h ?T8n 3H^?T »i^ uyypu 'E^IIWHftci 3D^T _n^. vvith the aforesaid observat disposed off. <^1<<[(T1*T|"T +11*1<lll* ^ fs%T ^; aifim SII^ST Panchayat, Kartaia to decide the ap^lication of the petitioner, in accordance with ruies, within a period of three| months. In case, no sucn oraers are passed, the Chief Executh/e Ofrice|-, Jila Panchayat, Korba shaii look into the matter expeditiously and as soofi as possibie. lons / directions. the peiition is finallv '———/a-^7___ Sd/- . ^-' Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge