HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIU^PUR WntPeUfionMo^234&ot2006 PeUtjoner Jairaj Singh Thakur ^ed - 44 years, S/o of Shri Sunhar Lal Thakur Posted as - Bhritya (Peon),At - S.S. l^libadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) R/o Gitti Khadan Road, Katora Talab, Ralpur, District • Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. 2 3 The Stete of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, O.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Director, Public Instructions, ChhatUsgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. The Governing Body of Kalibadi Shiksa Samiti, Through-ite School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. School, Katibadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A . 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Keshamani, Advocate for the peUtioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyerforthe respondents No. 1 and 2/Sterte. ORDER (Passed on this 16m day ofApril, 2007) The question of law involved herein is whether fte non-teaching staff woridng in Government aided school are entitted to the benefit of recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission under the provisioiis ofthe Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sanda^) Adhiniyam, 1978 (hencefbrth 'the Adhiniyam, 1978") and the rules made Uwreuiider read vnth tte Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1988 (henceforth the Pay Rules, 1988'). Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the terms and conditions of the teaching and non-teachlng staff are governed by the Thakur 4. same provisiona of law which were under conshleration by Vms Court ta the matter of Smt. A. Lall ire. State of Chhatfisgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), wherein by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that the pefifioners who are woridng in fully Govemment aided private schools are enfltted to <he revised pay-«sa(es wlth effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court fuither for the purp<»eof payment of arrears had granted eertain direction. Admjttedly and jointly, it is sutsnitted by the parties that this matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 62.2007 passed by this Court in e case of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected mattere (Supra). As a result, fof the reasons statad in the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Latl vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other conneeted matters) (Supra), the writ pstiUon is allowed in the same terms and conditions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge