MC 2967/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr PK Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr T Baidya, the l earned counsel for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr PN Goswami, the learned S tanding counsel, Education Department. The application is for impleading one Amulya Kalita as respondent No. 6 in the c onnected writ petition. The application is not opposed by any of the opposing c ounsel. Moreover, on perusal of the record, the person sought to be impleaded i s a proper party, if not a necessary party, for effective adjudication of the co ntroversy involved in the connected writ petition. Resultantly, Misc. applicat ion is allowed by making the said Amulya Kalita as respondent No. 6. The Regist ry is to make necessary and consequential correction in the cause title of the w rit petition. As the newly respondent is already represented, no formal notice is called for. Misc application stands disposed of.