@ @ Cg I6€)A slNGLE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPuR WRIT PETITION (C) No. ‘5 M k1? /2o11 k . PETITIONER’ : Sm’r. Sadhna Dhidhi W/o. Som Prakash, aged about : 26 year's, R/o. Village : Bhawanipur', Gram Panchaya‘r Bhawanipur, Tahsil : Palari, DisTric’r : Roipur‘ (6.6.). VERSUS RESPONDENTs r“ 1] S‘l'aTe of Chhaf‘risgar‘h, Through : The Secretary, Deparfmenf of I Panchayaf & Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Manfralaya, Ralpur, District : Raipur (C.G.). X, 2] The Collecfor, Ralpur, Disl'ricf ‘Raipur (6.6.). 3] / The Additional Collecfor Baloda \\ Bazar, Districf 2 Raipur (C.G.). 09.6??? ox \- 4] The Sub Divisional Officer, 4 «g. @\ (Revenue) Baloda Bazar, DisTricT : Q. q. Q«o rac’c $3): 6%” I”. 5] Raipur (C.6.). 5hri Dayananad Markandey S/o. Sevak Ram Markandey, (Suspended Sarpanch), aged abouT 2 5O years, R/o. Village : Bhawanipur, Gram Panchayai : Bhawanipur, Tahsil : Palari, " Disfricf : Raipur (C.G.). ’ @ RxT‘ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE W CONsTITUTION OF INDIA . Gowri (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri P.K. Patel, Advocate forthe petitioneri Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. . o R o E R (Passed on this 15‘“ day of September, 201 1) x_ 2. Learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner submits that without impleading the petitioner as party and without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, who is an aggrieved person, the Additional Collector, Balodabazar, by order dated 19—8-2011 has stayed the order dated 30-7-2011, whereunder the respondent No.5 was placed under suspension. 3. On perusal, it appears that the order has been passed ex parte without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. In that event, the petitioner is at liberty to make an application for considering her case before passing an interim order, if it is found that the petitioner was a proper and necessary party. 4. The petitioner is accordingly granted liberty to file an objection, if so advised, thereafter, the Additional Collector is directed to consider the objection of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law and on its own merits. 5. ln view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. “W sm- SATISH 1C ANGN‘HORI Heard learned counsel for the parties. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.5447 OF 2011 (Q PETITIONER Smt. Sadhna Dhidhi Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others