IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52480 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR @ GUDDU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.01.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is only himself to blame by not depositing the fax cost in time. To that extent this Court is not persuaded to allow the prayer for extension of time for surrender. The typographical error in the name of the presiding Judicial Magistrate in the order dated 22.10.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 38380 of 2008 arising out of Complaint Case No. 2046 of 2007 be corrected to read as Ramanand Ram in place of Parmanand Ram. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit preferably on the date that he surrenders, a situation created by himself by not depositing the fax cost in time, without being prejudiced by the present order. Let this order be communicated by fax at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)