((-#-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 21770 OF 2007 Adhikrao Sambhaji Panhale ... Petitioner Vs. State of Mah. and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.S. Talkute for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 21, 2008 DATED: JANUARY 21, 2008 DATED: JANUARY 21, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This Review Petition is sought tobe filed based on two documents which according to the learned counsel are relevant for the purpose of disposing of the Petitioners caste claim. This court by order dated 27.8.2007 in the absence of the Petitioner based on material on record rejected the Petitioner’s claim based on the facts that the father’s case in school register was shown as Hindu Koli and similarly documents of the Petitioner’s uncle and cousin brother. . The two documents which the Petitioner now seeks to rely which are annexed at Pages 27 and 28 of the Petition, one is supposed to be relative whose date of birth is shown as 16.7.1920 and date of leaving the school is 3.7.1945. The learned counsel produced zerox copy of the document to show that the date of birth is 15.7.1930. The other documents shown the date of birth as 1.5.1936. The date of admission is left blank and the date of leaving the school is shown as 30.5.1961. Both these documents were not available before the Committee. Even otherwise, they inspire no confidence as it is impossible that the student was in the school for about 25 years. Even otherwise, the relationship between the Petitioner and those two persons has not been established. Hence, Review Petition rejected. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)