IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1131 OF 2010 IN CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO. 7628 OF 2010 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 6276 OF 2010 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.1131 OF 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Jungi Giri, son of Makeshwar Giri, resident of Village Dihuli, Police Station-Angarghat, District-Samastipur ----- Petitioner-Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Additional Director Consolidation, Samastipur. 3. The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Samastipur 4. Mosmatt Shiva Devi wife of Sagar Giri 5. Shyam Kishore Giri 6. Yugal Giri 7. Bipin Giri, all are sons of Sagar Giri, respondent no.4 to 7 Ist, all are residents of Village Angarghat, Rahimpur, Police Station-Ujiarpur, District- Samastipur. 8. Jagdish Mahto son of Wattu Mahto 9. Ashok Mahto son of Wattu Mahto, All are respondents no. 8 to 11 2nd Set are resident of Village Dihuli, Police Station Ujiarpur, Dak Khana, Angarghat, Subdivision & District-Samastipur --- Respondents/Respondents. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Appearance : For the Appellant: Mr. S.K. Tiwary, Advocate For theRespondent: Mr.Bajrangi Lal, A.C. to G.A. No.VIII = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = CORAM : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. KATRIAR ORAL ORDER (Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 23.7.2010 This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is preferred by the writ petitioner against the order dated 7th May 2010 of the learned Single Judge made in the above 2 C.W.J.C. No. 7628 of 2010. Learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground of delay and laches. It is not in dispute that the appellant had challenged the order dated 17th July 1993 before the learned Single Judge after an un-explained delay of 17 years. Learned Advocate Mr. S.K. Tiwary has appeared for the appellant. He states that the appellant may seek review of the impugned order before the learned Single Judge. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal and the interlocutory application. Leave is granted. Letters Patent Appeal and interlocutory application stand disposed of as withdrawn. Vinay/ (R.M. Doshit, CJ.) ( S. K. Katriar ,J. )