IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C.(T) No. 157 of 2008. Decided on: 8th October, 2010. Anil Kant Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri Satish Kumar Arora. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ashok Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ashok Thakur, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 8th October, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.