CRM- M 30466 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 30466 of 2011 Date of decision : November 22, 2011 Jagdev Kaur, ...... Petitioner v. State of Punjab, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Abrol, AAG Punjab Mr. S.S.Toor, Advocate for the complainant. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.294, dated 22.10.2010, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 of the IPC, at Police Station Payal, District Khanna. On 12.10.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order dated 25.5.2011 passed in CRM-M No.14195 of 2011 to contend that the co-accused-husband (father-in- law) was granted the concession of anticipatory bail.” Apart from that, counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Harpal CRM- M 30466 of 2011 ::2:: Singh, has accepted the factual assertions. In these circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, in the event of her arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 22, 2011. JUDGE `kk'