1 cp260.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6368 OF 2006 [ Ram Malhari More vs. The State of Mah. & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.V. Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for respondent-State. Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for R.No.3. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. It is not in dispute that, after order passed by the Division Bench, there is no any recovery by the respondents from the petitioner. In that view of the matter, there is no breach of order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 2 cp260.11 3. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that, since the recovery is stayed by this Court, the respondents should release the pension amount, cannot be the subject matter of this contempt petition. From careful perusal of the averments in the petition, interim relief granted by the Division Bench, in my considered opinion, there is no disobedience much less willful disobedience of order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 4. In that view of the matter, contempt petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/OCT11