IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16343 of 2009 1. JAI PRAKASH MANDAL, son of Baldeo Mandal 2. Mritunjay Anand, son of late Brahmanand Mandal 3. Md. Jabul, son of Md. Paithan Ali 4. Md. Aiyub Alam, son of Saidul Rahman 5. Paithan Ali, son of late Sudan Mian @ Sultan Ali 6. Md. Kamruzzama, son of Jahan Ali Petitioner nos.1 and 2 are residents of village Maratipur and nos.3,4,5 and 6 of village Dahuabari, P.S.-Kursakanta, District-Araria -------Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that difference is there for construction of the school building at a particular place. Government officials intervened and decision was taken for construction of the school building not over the complainant’s land. Further allegation is demand of ransom but there is no delivery. Next one is about obtaining thumb impression on several papers but that is not used up-til-now and allegation of abuse in the name of caste to humiliate is specific upon Chintalal Mandal and Jai Prakash Mandal. Though a vague allegation is made about abuse by these petitioners that is apparently super-addition. It cannot be taken for even constituting an offence under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Rest of the offences are bailable even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case no.580C of 2008, the above - 2 - named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.M. Kumar, J.M., Ist Class, Araria , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )