:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2229 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2229 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2229 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.114 OF 2006 (L) NO.114 OF 2006 (L) NO.114 OF 2006 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.363 OF 2005 PETITION NO.363 OF 2005 PETITION NO.363 OF 2005 IN IN IN BSE BSE BSE APPEAL NO.48A OF 2004 APPEAL NO.48A OF 2004 APPEAL NO.48A OF 2004 IN IN IN BSE BSE BSE AWARD IN REF.NO.45 OF 2004 AWARD IN REF.NO.45 OF 2004 AWARD IN REF.NO.45 OF 2004 Naren Sanghvi ..Appellant Vs. SVV Shares & Stock Brokers Pvt.Ltd. and Anr. ..Respondents Ms.Khot i/b.A.K.Maheshwari for the Appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents though served. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. The learned Counsel for the Appellant tendered affidavit of service. The same is taken on record. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 62 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)