THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.3634 of 2010 ORDER: The first respondent/decree holder filed E.P.No.96 of 2007 in O.S.No.101 of 2003 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, seeking to issue warrant of arrest of the petitioner/judgment debtor and commit him to civil prison for realisation of the decretal amount i.e., Rs.3,12,182/-. During the pendency of the said E.P., the petitioner paid a sum of Rs.1,70,000/- on different dates towards part satisfaction of the decretal amount. Since he failed to pay the balance decretal amount, the executing Court vide order, dated 01.10.2009, ordered to issue arrest warrant by 29.10.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/judgment debtor filed the present revision. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Cxourt below ought not to have ordered the arrest of petitioner/judgment debtor without adducing any evidence. He further contended that the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.1,70,000/-and that he has no means to pay the balance decretal amount.. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. 5. From a perusal of the order impugned, it shows that the executing Court has not given any reasons for ordering the arrest of the petitioner/judgment debtor except that he was absent when the matter was called. is evidence that the petitioner clear that the respondent had paid an amount of Rs.20,000/-to the petitioner on 28.01.2008 towards part satisfaction of the decretal amount. As he paid part of the decretal amount, it cannot be said that he has no means to pay the remaining decretal amount. However, the petitioner/decree holder has not produced any particulars of the property owned by the respondent or his earnings, except the oral testimony of P.W.1, whose evidence is not satisfactory as regards the means of the judgment debtor. In the circumstances, to meet the ends of justice, I deem it appropriate to give an opportunity to the petitioner to furnish any material with regard to the property details and the earnings of the judgment debtor. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed, setting aside the order impugned. The petitioner/decree holder is permitted to furnish any material as regards the property details and the earnings of the respondent/judgment debtor, thereupon, the Executing Court shall decide the matter as per law. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:27.08.2010 sj