IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7733 of 2009 1. SAHNABAJ 2. TINKU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 27.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police Case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The impugned order reflects that co-accused Guddu was apprehended on the spot when he named the petitioners who are alleged to have fled away. That co-accused Guddu might have granted regular bail is a matter to be appropriately considered in a regular bail application on behalf of the petitioners, without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is rejected. S.Sb/- (Navin Sinha, J.)