C.R. No. 3775 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 3775 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.08.2010 Smt. Sunita Jain .......... Petitioner Versus Municipal Council, Hansi & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. V.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. J.L. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to challenge the order dated 13.5.2010, passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge ( Sr. Div.), Hansi, vide which the application moved by the petitioner for consolidation of two suits, in which the petitioner is a party, stands declined. The learned trial Court rejected the application, for the reason that the parties to the suit were different, and independent evidence is required to be led in both the cases. The relief claimed is also different in both the cases. The order passed by the learned trial Court being in C.R. No. 3775 of 2010 -2- **** consonance with law, does not call for interference by this Court. Once the parties to the suit were different, and independent evidence was required to be led, in both the cases, and furthermore the relief claimed was also different in both the cases, therefore, there is no reason to consolidate both the cases, merely because petitioner is party in those cases. No merit. Dismissed. 25.08.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE