<3i©1SS IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS^ N0. °^5^l OF 2009 PFTITIONER /^" w^/ ^,.- ^~-' fi^y 7^/ .f.^ / ^/v %<~' :y RESPONDENTS ...r Ku. Kamalya Sahu D/o Shri Banshee Lal Sahu, Aged about 22 years Occupation-Shikshakarmi Class-III, Primary School Devsaral, Block- Division Pithora, Vikaskhand Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1. ' State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District- Raipur,(C.G.) 2. Collector, Mahasamund, Djstrict- Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive OfRcer, Janpad Panchayat, Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ^" 4. District Education OfRcer, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ^ 5. Chief Executive OfRcer, District-Panchayat Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA ^ST'as^ £••If' %. :C—7S 3ST "4|A||d<l, ®nly<|6,f»«niyy,< ...........^.ff:..LS.)...2>Z&l. aww^i wivi i^t "BLE SHSI JUSTIC3 ^.f\Hf •K&^y: Sfiri Raghavendra Pradt Shri Shashank Thakur, ureselit Challenge ia tlie 10.6.2009 (Anjiexiu-e P/1) OfBcer, Janpad Paiichayat, !; which th.e appointment of th.^ tlie ground that pursuant to\ Court iii its iudgiaent dated 11 ao. opportuiiily but her select Grade III has not been foui therefoi^. the same has been ( Counsel fcr the petitiq order is raec.haaical ia natiu-e Executive Of&cer withoiit con^ aiid even witiiout in.eBUo'nind petitioner. He furfb.er- subiu| cyclostyle order where th.e of fb.e scliool has been put s thaf while passisig the order applied its naitie If< On the otlier Iiand. couj| Betitioner has aa altemative qii<rf?i4^ 'W^f ^f ^st ^r»(^K tan, coiuisel for the cetitioner. IP.L. forfhe State. petitioa is to th.e order dated bassed by tfie Chief Executive tttliora, District MahasaQiund bv petition.er has been caacelled on tb.e dii-ection given bv the Hish t.3.2008, fh.e petition.er wa.s given on the nost of Shiksha Karmi id ill accordaace with law and laaceUed. ber subinits fhat tlie uapugned aiid Iias been passed bv fhe Chief iid.eiing the reulv of tlie petitioner as to what was fb.e fa.ult of fhe Its that the order impugned of fhe petitioner aad the name LibsequeB.tJ.y aiid fh.is itsetf shows impugned the authority hss not isel for fhe State subiaits fbat the rem.edy under the Chbattisgarh i 1J?1 I-Hg—7i 'S^ -^WW<i, •&^\WI<c, [^WVy .......^.:.&..:.C>^2^.l^, 1 Sit^I^i wnCT^ Panchayat Shiksha Kanni (] Rules, 2007 $for short "fae| CoUector by filiiig the appe^ (pecruitnient 8u Conditicns of Service) Rules, 2007) aiid to approa.ch the 11.. At fhis stage, counsel of tliis Court to wifhdraw approach fhe Conector by ( tliat alo.ng with the appeal| stay aad tiil fhe said appUc4 due appUcatioii of mmd th^ as Sliikslia Karmi Grade III J totdlit', Consideriiig fhe tot^ permitted to witlidraw th] approach tlie Collector und| req-uiTed to file an appeal froia llie date of receipt of application for stay. Tffl fh^ by the CoUector after due sliail be allowed to work as opportunit)' to fh.e petitione ail tlie details in support fhe same in. accordaace wil olf .tJt qnsfofM •wrcff'?•ft^t'^R?R ftsflwa? l' for fhe petitioaer seeks perm.ission |the present petiti.cn with Ubert;- to iluig aii appesd. He fui-ther subinits she.wul also fue an atsplication for ition is decided 'bv fhe CoUector after • petitioner in.ay be allowed to work ^ity of fhe facts, tlie petitioiier is present petition wifh libert}- to ;r fhe Rules, 2007. TIie petitioner is before the Coliector wifb.ia 15 davs Lhe copy of this order along wifh aa said applicatioa for stay is decided appUcation of inind, the petitioner Bhiksha Kanai Grade II.!. It is expected fror4. fhe CoUector to afford proper t" as weU a.s the oth.er side to subm.it fheir respective clai.ms smd decide law, on its nierits. expeditiouslv. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker judge ^