IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAK AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SIHAL BETEN: 3 .A swathanarayanachar, Arbitrator - Judge, (No.11/223, Bangalore Road) Ward No.j7 Door No,, 6th Cross, Sathyanarayanapeth, Bellary. ,,• Petitioner, (By Si’i B.V.Katageri for Petr,) AND: Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Vanijya Therige r1sya, Gandhinagara, Bangalore - S. ... Respondent. (By t.S.ijatha, HCGP, for Respdt.) This Writ Petition filed imder Articles 226 & 227 of the Cotitution of India with an affi davit praying to: Quash vide Annex.C dt.1-4-98 by the respondent and etc. 2/— -2- This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following: The dispute is with regard to non—issue of certain copies required by the petitioner who is an aa’bitrator appointd by the Court. Without going to the controversy, I consider it proper that the petitioner may obtain vakalath/Authority letter from any of the partner and on that basis the respondent would permit inspection or collection of information for adjudication of dispute. Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. Sd!- Judge. b sr C o • s.) r,by:. c.by: C®P AiStt R,gisWa? CoIt of ri*tak