1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1802 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3228 OF 2007 Pradeep Hirani ....Plaintiff V/s. Jude Chandran & Ors. ....Defendants And M/s.Tanwar Estates Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent Ms.Kavita A. Shah for the Plaintiff. Ms.Priya Khaitan i/b M/s.Khaitan & Jayakar for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. After the suit was filed, the Plaintiff was informed about the alleged transaction between the Defendants and the Respondent. The Respondent is therefore, sought to be impleaded as Defendant No.5. 2. On behalf of the Defendants, it was stated that the transaction between Defendant No.1 is proposed to be cancelled and that the parties are trying to work out the modalities in that regard. 3. The transaction between the Defendants and the Respondent has todate however not being finally cancelled. In the circumstances, it is necessary to allow the Chamber Summons. The Defendants are always at liberty to make an application to have the Respondent/proposed Defendant 2 No.5 deleted as a party in the event of the transaction between the Defendants and the Respondent being cancelled subsequently. 4. With the above clarification, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b).The amendments to be carried out within four weeks from today.