S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.643/2010 Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs. The State & Anr. Dated : 16.04.2010 HON'BLE MR. MAHESH BHAGWATI,J. Mr. Anoop Pareek, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev K. Mehla, PP for the State. *** By way of this criminal misc. petition filed u/s 482 of Cr.P.C, the petitioner Vijay Bahadur Singh has implored to set aside the order dated 17th February, 2010 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Karauli, whereby the revision petition was dismissed and the order of taking cognizance dated 12th April, 2007 passed by Additional Judicial Magistrate, Karauli was confirmed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the contents of Misc. Petition, it is noticed that the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate, Karauli took the cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act on 12th April, 2007 and proceeded against the petitioner. From the perusal of the impugned order dated 17th February, 2010, it is also noticed that the petitioner appeared before the learned trial Court on 20th March, 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner canvassed that he came to know about the order of taking cognizance on 20th August, 2009 when he appeared before the Court. Learned Additional Sessions Judge did not rely upon the submissions made by the petitioner for the reasons assigned in the order. It is apparent from the impugned order that the accused petitioner appeared before the learned trial Court on 20th April, 2009 when he asked for bail. Learned revisional court observed that the petitioner had come to know about the order of taking cognizance on 20th March 2009 only when he put his appearance before the Court when he asked for bail. The revisional court has also observed that since the revision was filed on 3rd September, 2009; the same was barred by limitation and on this ground alone, the revision was dismissed. The impugned order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Karauli seems to be just and proper and suffers form no infirmity. I am in unison with the finding arrived at by the learned revisional court and the impugned order warrants no intervention and the petition deserves to be dismissed at the threshold. For the reasons stated above, the criminal Misc. petition being bereft of any merit, stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI)J. pcg