IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2055 of 2011 Decided on: April 13, 2011. Himanshu …….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …….Respondents. _________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, vice Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner, who is a PTA teacher, is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the sixth respondent. According to the petitioner, the sixth respondent can work in other convenient regular vacancies. The petitioner may point out the places, where the sixth respondent is willing to work and on such willingness being produced before the second respondent, appropriate action will be taken by the second respondent in that regard and in the resultant vacancy, in case the petitioner is otherwise found eligible, he shall be re-engaged. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 13, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (pankaj/bss) Judge.