IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the October 27, 2009 Criminal Bail Application No. 803 of 2009 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Rashid S/o Nazar R/o Village Sahaspur, P.S. Sahaspur District Dehradun … Applicant Vs State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of Case Crime No. 139 of 2009 Under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34 and 506 of I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Vikasnagar District Dehradun By the court Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J The applicant has applied for bail in Case Crime No. 139 of 2009, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34 and 506 of I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. In this case co-accused Mehboob Hasan and Israr have been granted bail by Hon’ble Justice J.C.S. Rawat vide orders dated 15.07.2009 and 17.07.2009 respectively. The interim order for staying the arrest has been passed by Hon’ble Justice J.C.S. Rawat vide order dated 27.07.2009 in favour of the Naseem. The role of the present applicant is similar to that of Mehboob Hasan and Israr. Therefore, on the ground of parity, I think, that the applicant is also entitled for bail at this stage. Learned A.G.A. has invited my attention that the applicant has a long criminal history in his credit but after perusing the list produced by the learned A.G.A. along with an affidavit, it appears that in maximum number of case, the applicant has been acquitted. Moreover, the other co-accused have been granted bail on this ground of no significance. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I think, it would be just and proper to release the applicant on bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 27.10.2009 ASWAL