1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2613 of 2011 [Sukhdeo M. Ingle Vs. Indian Oil Corporation & aother] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.R. Gadhia, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. N.W. Sambre, Adv., for respondents. ----- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 14th October, 2011. 1. Heard. 2. We notice an attempt to mislead this Court by petitioner. A Gift-Deed is being relied upon, but then that Gift-Deed is not disclosed as a source of title in the application submitted to respondents for dealership. The Gift-Deed mentions handing over of possession on 15th April, 2010, but it is an unregistered document. 2 3. Today, learned counsel is seeking time to produce registered Sale-Deed on record. We have perused photostat copy of that registered sale-deed. The same is taken on record and marked as Exh. X for identification. This document does not show handing over of possession on the date of Gift-Deed. On the contrary, it specifically mentions a money consideration of Rs.1,00,000-00 paid earlier, and amount of Rs. 70,000-00 was agreed to be paid on 30th June, 2011. The sale-deed mentions that thus, a total amount of Rs. 1,70,000-00 is received by vendor Shri Tukaram Vitthalrao Tawar from present petitioner. This sale-deed is registered on 2nd August, 2010. 4. During arguments, when questions in order to find out the correctness, or otherwise, of assertion of Gift-Deed were put, it was disclosed that Tukaram treats the petitioner as his grand-son. There is no such assertion either in the petition or in the Gift-Deed. The contents of sale-deed betray the story of the Gift-Deed. 5. Thus, petitioner has approached respondent nos. 1 and 2 with incorrect and false information and thereafter had a courage to even move this Court and attempt to mislead it. 6. We are, therefore, dismissing this petition with a cost of Rs.1,000-00 [rupees one 3 thousand only] payable by petitioner to respondent nos. 1 and 2. Judge Judge |Hedau|