THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.17985 of 2009 DATE:27.08.2009 Between: Salma Naheed ... Petitioner and The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar P.S., R.R.District and others ... Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.17985 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of 1st respondent in not conducting investigation into Crime No.99 of 2009 dated 27.02.2009 registered basing on her complaint dated 29.12.2008 against respondents 2 and 3, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that she is the absolute owner and possessor of plot No.2, admeasuring 200 square yards, in Sy.No.12 of Bata Singaram village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Rangareddy District, having purchased the same from 3rd respondent, who is no other than G.P.A. of 2nd respondent, under a registered sale deed in the year 2003, for a valid sale consideration. While so, when the respondents 2 and 3 started interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plot, she filed O.S.No.3106 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar against them for permanent injunction and the same was decreed in her favour on 24.06.2009. However, on 29.12.2008 they illegally trespassed into the plot and erected some pillars by causing obstruction to her and her husband. Thereupon, she filed a private complaint against them for the offences under Sections 327, 329, 424, 441, 506, 447 and 120-B r/w 34 IPC, before the VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Hayathnagar, who in turn, forwarded the same to the 1st respondent. Having received the same, the 1st respondent registered the complaint as a case in Crime No.99 of 2009. Though the complaint was registered way back in the month of February, 2009, the 1st respondent has not chosen to conduct investigation into the crime so far. Aggrieved by the same, she filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. 4. As seen from the FIR, it is clear that it is more than six months since the date of registration of the crime i.e. 27.02.2009. It is true that it would take some more time for the 1st respondent to complete the entire investigation, but at the same time he shall see that the investigation is completed at the earliest. In the light of the same and as it is the grievance of the petitioner that there is no progress in the investigation of the crime, this court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to complete the investigation at the earliest. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to expedite the investigation by examining the witnesses and recording their statements and file a final report, preferably, within a period of six (6) months from today. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 27th August, 2009 CBS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.17985 of 2009 (Disposed of) 27th August, 2009 CBS