1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Company Application No.69 OF 2007. IN Company Petition No.6 of 2006. WITH Company Contempt Petiton No.160 of 2007. M/s Sukhdeo Agrawal v M/s Nav Bharat Press (Bhopal) Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri V. R. Mundra, Advocate for the for the appellant. S/Shri A. S. Jaiswal and I. J. Damle, Advocates for Respondent. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 25th June, 2009. 1. This is an application by the Respondent Company seeking modification in the consent terms. 2. Parties are concurrent on the ground that dates of payment agreed in the consent terms which was the foudnation of the order passed by this Court on 21-12-2006 were not adhered to, however, the money agreed to be paid under the consent term is already paid. 3. In view of the fact that the payment is already made, the present application has outlived the purpose thereof. The applicant could have sought in 2 advance enlargement of time for condonation, had it been so permissible in law. 4. In view that the application has outlived its purpose, it became infructuous and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE /Muley/