1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. A. No. 4197 OF 2008 (In MCA St. 5891/07 in Rej. S.A.863/07) Kisan s/o Domaji Gajbhiye v. Mrs. Tulsabai w/o Stephen Peter & ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.D. Sirpurkar Adv. For appellant. Mr. P.S. Khubalkar Adv. For Res. no. 1 to 4. .... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 26 th JUNE, 2009. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing application for restoration of second appeal which was dismissed for nor removal of office objections. 2. Mr.Khubalkar, learned counsel for respondents, has vehemently opposed the application on the ground that the reasons furnished in the application are not good and sufficient. 3. Having heard learned counsel for both sides, I find that reasons in paragraphs 1 and 2 have been furnished by 2 the appellant which, in my opinion, are good and sufficient. Consequently, delay of 158 days in filing application for restoration of second appeal is condoned. Civil Application disposed of in terms of its prayer clause. M.C.A. St.No. 5891/08 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.Khubalkar, learned counsel for the non-applicants strongly opposed the application. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. In view of the statement made by Mr.Sirpurkar that all office objections will be removed on or before 10.7.2009, second appeal is restored to file. JUDGE /TA/