THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.2861 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.507 of 2010 in the Court of X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction. It appears that the grievance was that the 1st respondent is functioning and conducting tournaments in the name of the petitioner, though its registered name is somewhat different. The petitioner has also filed I.A.No.100 of 2010 under Section 151 C.P.C. with a prayer to direct respondents 1 and 2 not to use the name and style of the petitioner- association. The application was opposed by the respondents. The trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order dated 01.06.2010. Hence, this revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was registered duly obtaining permission of the State Government to use the words ‘Andhra Pradesh State’ for naming the association, whereas the 1st respondent has come into existence with the dubious description. He contends that the description is A.P.S.Weight Lifting Association, whereas the tournaments are being conducted in the name of Andhra Pradesh State Weight Lighting Association, which is in fact the name of the petitioner-association. He submits that the trial Court did not examine the matter from the proper perspective. I.A.No.100 of 2010 filed by the petitioner was disposed of together with I.A.No.90 of 2010, which was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. in relation to a forthcoming weight lifting championship. It is a matter of record that the petitioner came into existence on account of its registration in 2009. By that date, the 2nd respondent was functioning and conducting tournaments. It would have been a different matter altogether, had the petitioner been in existence before the 1st respondent was formed or registered and it started using the name of the petitioner. It is exactly the other way. Further, the record placed before the trial Court disclosed that the 1st respondent was conducting tournaments and it had been undertaking correspondence with premier organizations like Indian Weight Lifting Federation, A.P. Olympic association etc. The trial Court has taken into account the evidence on record and dismissed the I.A. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon an additional document viz., information furnished by the District Registrar, Krishna, Machilipatnam, dated 06.07.2010. It is to the effect that though the Andhra Pradesh State Weight Lifting Association was registered in the year 1972 with register No.8 of 1972, that society has become defunct. The letter does not suggest that the registration of the association has been cancelled or it has been wound up in accordance with law. The expression ‘defunct’ has no specific meaning in legal parlance. At any rate, the matter needs to be examined in detail at the stage of trial. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. The trial Court shall dispose of the suit as early as possible uninfluenced by any observations made by it in the order under revision. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 06.08.2010 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.2861 of 2010 Date: 06.08.2010 JSU