(:9 ‘S B’ (Service Matter) IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT O CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 7 WRIT PETITIONS) NO QQ’XV [201 1 / Shallesh Pathak, son of Ram Yash PETITIONER: ‘ Path’ak, age about 37 years, /¢{\m{Z//_ worldng as Cglerk, Nagar Panchayat, L BagiCha, Dislt'rict Jashpur, Chhattis’garhf. Versus ' ' /1. State of Chhattlsgarh through Secretary Department of Urban Adm1n1strat10n and Developmen Mantralaya at D K S Bhawan, - Respondents ”Ralpur, C.G. . NagarPanchayat Bagicha, Through . aChief Municipal Officer, Bagicha, - District Jashpurx Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF T CONSTITUTION OF INDIA rm C t HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR ’AT B§LA8PUR WRIT PETiTlON (S3 No. 24112 0f gGH ‘ PETlTlONEg 2 Shaélesh Pat 3k ' VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chh ttisgarh & Another. WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARHCLE 226 OF THE CGNSTiTUTlON OF lNDiA t i Ashok‘ , 1 Wists) No4 7459 or2o1o: dectciéd o‘n 10.022011 ‘SB: Hon’b!e Shri Satish K. Aahihotrii J. N? Present g bhn J.K. Saxena,_Advocate forthe detitnoner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate fer the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 09‘“ day of May, 201 t) 1. At the very outset learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that the issue With regard to apptlcabmty of 3 Circutars dated 23 09 2010 and 05 03 2008‘ was consrdered m f Virendra Des Mamkpun & Others v The State of Chhamsgarh & :‘ Others1 Thrs Court after hearing at! the parties conadered the ' msue and passed the order m Virendra Des Mamkpun & Others Thrs petmon may be disposed cf accordmgty 2. Thus, having regard to the facts situation of the case; wherein the ‘ issue involved in Virendra Des Manikpuri & Others’ as welt as in I ‘ this case are one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virehdra Das 1 Mahikpwm Qthers’ . , sd/_ l; ' r ti SdtlshK Agmhotrl to a I t , Judge