,ench ^ !N.T] mGHCQURTOF.JUDICATlJ^,.AT-BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO. 4~l 87 OF 2QQ4 BETWEEN PETTTIONERS ^^^ 1^yAr ^'::€y^ ^jK.'- ^ <^^ y« 1. G.P.DUBEY AGED-61YEARS SON OF LATE S. P. DUBEY R/0 - BRAHMAN PARA, WARD N0. 58 HOUSE N0. 358, RAIPUR DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C.G.) CHAIT RAM YADU, AGED - 58 YEARS SONOF MEHATTARRAMYADU R/0 DAGANYA, RAIPUR (C.G.) DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C.G.) SMT. M. DHVAN, AGED - 57 YEARS WIFE OF SHRI BANSfflDHAR DIWAN R/0 - NEAR SAI MANDIR, MAHADEVGHAT, RAIPURA, DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C.G.) ^4. SMT. SUCHITA DUBEY AGED - 53 YEARS WIFE OF SHRI NARENDRA DUBEY R/0 - D/27, TAIGORE NAGAR, RAIPUR DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C.G.) ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE WORK1NG AS - ASSISTANT TEACHERS, AT - GOVT. J.R.DANI GIRLS mGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, RAIPUR(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /3. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. THEDIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, CHHATHSGARH, RAIPUR DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, AT-RAIPUR(C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226 & 227 QF CQNSTmJTIQN OF INDIA SRT^IWTT^ ;'3mfr' i«i:c<f«^ui-at-9<ld,Rlril<iy'< oa.p.^^o, /j^. 0. ^200 3II^?TWR'iicb aaiTaii^TSptirai (.t ^-Ti^•^&^ '< SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^J ?< 3TI^9T Ha^P (^crfg^) 23,9.2005 Shri. Arun Sad ^rafeFftT'ntTffr'^fei^^KSK ^sri^Tan^r ' Shri R. K. Keshatwaiu, Advocate for fhe petitioneis. respondeuts. Heard. Leamed eounse Depuly Govt. Advocate for fhe for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been 1jporktag as Assistant Teaeher and have coxapleted 24 years |regular semce. The petitioners are entifled to second tn4e bond proinotion hut fhey have not been granted fhesam^, wluch is coutraiy to fhe provisions of fhe Circular dated 11 1999/19.4.1999 (Ann| '.3.2004 (Annexure P/2), l7th March ixure P/3), 4th April, 2000 (Aiuiexure P/4), 19& April, 20p0 (Annexure P/5), 2nd May, 2002 (Annexure P/6) aad 14th Jaauaiy, 8003 (Annexure P/7). Leanied couase^ for ttie respondeats does aot dispute the aforestated subin^ssion inade by learaed counsel for fhe petitioners. Haviug heard le^med counsel for fhe parties and haviag perused the aforesaid documents, the petition is aUowed aad fhe concemed Distdict Education Of&cer is directed to consider fhe case of fSie petitioners, in accordance with the above stated circul4ra, for grant of second tuae bond proinotion. Noorder a^ tpcosts. ^ ^_ Certified copy, ^s per Rules. 3W~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge