bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23769 OF 2008 APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23769 OF 2008 APPLICATION (ST) NO. 23769 OF 2008 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 18550 OF 2007 FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 18550 OF 2007 FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 18550 OF 2007 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 126 OF 2002 FROM ORDER NO. 126 OF 2002 FROM ORDER NO. 126 OF 2002 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 102 OF 2002 FROM ORDER NO. 102 OF 2002 FROM ORDER NO. 102 OF 2002 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 113 OF 2002 FROM ORDER NO. 113 OF 2002 FROM ORDER NO. 113 OF 2002 Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ... Appellant v/s Kaushal Kumar R. Mourya ... Respondent (Applicant in C.A.) Mr.M.V.Holmagi for the respondent i.e. the applicant in civil application. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 12TH DECEMBER, 2008 12TH DECEMBER, 2008 12TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. This civil application has been filed for recalling, cancelling and setting aside the order dated 21.7.2008 by contending that it had been obtained by the Municipal Corporation in collusion with MHADA, the builders and Co-operative Societies. Damages are also claimed in this civil application to the tune of Rs.20 lacs. 2. In effect this civil application seeks a review of 2 the order. Apart from this, a contention is raised that the applicant was not heard since the applicant was not represented on that day. Various other contentions have been raised in the civil application especially by contending that there was some misunderstanding and the respondents were not heard before passing the order. 3. The board of 21.7.2008 shows the appearance of the applicant’s advocate. For reasons best known to him he remained absent on that day. The Court is not expected to wait till such time as the advocate decides to represent the respondent in Court. Apart from this, no case has been made out for recalling the order. 4. Civil application dismissed.