IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8645 of 2010 1. BIPUL KUMAR, S/O SRI JITENDRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE TILAKPUR, P.S.- CHANAN, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE), GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL,MUNGER RANGE,MUNGER. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,MUNGER. 5. COMMANDANT,B.M.P.- 9 JAMALPUR, DISTRICT- MUNGER. ----------- 2. 10.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims tobe an applicant under Advertisement Nos. 1 and 2 of 2004 for appointment on the post of Constable. He claims that he was declared successful in the physical test and was awarded 13 marks but was not called for counseling. That vacancies may be available does not vest in him a right to appointment unless he makes out a specific case of arbitrariness and discrimination in appointment. The pleadings are vague. He asserts that he secured 13 marks but does not allege much less name any other candidate with lesser marks than him having been appointed. In that view of the matter leave is sought to withdraw the application to file a proper representation before the respondent authorities. Only if the petitioner files a proper representation making full and detailed disclosure of arbitrariness and discrimination along with names of the concerned candidates only in that event this Court requires the respondents to consider the representation and dispose it by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a maximum period of three months from the date of its filing. In that event the withdrawal of the writ application shall not prejudice the petitioner in so far as the respondents are concerned. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)