IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CRMPM No.458 of 2007 Decided on: July 9, 2007 State of H.P. ......Petitioner. VERSUS Himanshu Sharma ......Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Additional Advocate General. For the Respondent : Nemo. ___________________________________________________________ Surjit Singh, Judge (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Respondent was sent up for trial for rash or negligent driving of a Maruti Van. The summary of the allegations, which were there against him, is like this. A car was parked at Navbahar Parking which, according to PW-1, the driver of the car, is on the right side of the road. This car entered the road and in the meanwhile the Van appeared there, allegedly at an excessive speed, and rammed into the car on the road. Trial Court has considered the entire evidence and came to the conclusion that probably the car entered the road from the parking without giving proper signal and also without caring for the traffic on the road. The view taken by the trial Court appears to be probable and based on proper appreciation of evidence. Hence, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. July 9, 2007(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J. Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?