AB 3626/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. A. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K. Mun ir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 Cr. P.C. praying for pre-arrest bail in favour of the petitioner, Shri Ratneswar Deka in Connection with CID P.S. Case No. 11/2011 under Sections 120(B)/448/419/384 IPC. Perused the case diary. The earlier prayer for pre-arrest bail was rejected by this Court vide order dat ed 26.4.2011 passed in A.B. No. 890/2011. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the mother of the petitioner has been suffering from cancer and that the petitioner is required to look-after his ailing mother. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of this case and the ground that the mother of the petitioner is a cancer patient cannot be sufficient reason to extend the benefit of the pre-arrest bail under Section 120(B)/ 448/ 419/ 384 IP C. Hence, prayer for bail is rejected. Return the case diary. The A.B. stands dismissed. .