IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3002 of 2011 Date of decision: 5.5.2011 Haryana Power Generation Corp. Limited and others … Petitioners versus Gobind Singh … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. S.K.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioners are the defendants in the suit for declaration with consequential relief of mandatory injunction titled Gobind Singh v. Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited and others. One of the issues framed in the case is issue No.3 i.e. “whether the suit is not maintainable in the present form”. Defendants moved an application for framing an additional issue to the effect “whether the plaintiff has valued the suit in accordance with law and whether court- fee paid by him is as per law”. The application has been dismissed vide order dated 15.12.2010 passed by the Civil Judge(Sr.Division) Faridabad. Hence, this revision. Counsel for the petitioners himself points out that the trial Court while dismissing the application has observed that the additional issue which has been sought to be framed, stands covered in issue No.3 that has already been framed. Once the Court which is seized of the matter observes that the issue regarding valuation of court-fee in the present suit would be dealt with in issue No.3, it leaves no grievance to the defendant- petitioners. There is no merit in this revision petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. May 05, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE