IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1312 of 2011 MUKESH KUMAR, son of Rabindra Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22-02-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No.171 of 2010 registered under Sections 420, 467, 471, 379 and 120(b) of the I.P.C. It appears from perusal of F.I.R. as well as impugned order of learned court below that the petitioner was caught in this case on the basis of footage of T.V., and subsequently, two A.T.M. cards belonging to other persons were recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no doubt Koilwar P.S. Case No.172 of 2010 was registered against the petitioner with allegation that he had fled away from - 2 - the custody of the police, but the petitioner has already been released in the above stated Koilwar P.S. Case No.172 of 2010. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Mukesh Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with above stated Koilwar P.S. Case No.171 of 2010, subject to condition that one of the sureties must be father of the petitioner. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)