IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 26254 of 2009(S) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. THE PERAMBRA PANCHAYATBYPASS ROAD ACTION COUNCIL, PERAMBRA, KOSHIKODE DIST, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, MR.JOSEPH M.C., S/O.CHANDY, MALEPARAMBIL HOUSE, PULIKKOOL, PERAMBRA - 673 525. 2. MOOSSA M., THANDANKANDY HOUSE, PULIKKOOL, PERAMBRA, PIN:673 525. 3. ABU A.K., MEERANGATTU HOUSE, PYTHOTH ROAD, PERAMBRA PIN:673 525. 4. K.K.PRASAD, THANDANKANDY HOUSE, PULIKKOOL, PERAMBRA, PIN:673 525. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T. RAMPRASAD UNNI SMT.SMITHA GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER(R & B) NORTH CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE. BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SMT.K. MEERA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R. Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 26254 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. This Public Interest Litigation is filed challenging the alignment plan for construction of bypass road of Kozhikode-Kuttiyadi road passing through Permbra and with a further prayer to effect the alignment avoiding curves, turns in Perambra town. 2. We need not go into the detailed allegations raised by the petitioners at this stage since suffice it to say that as the petitioners have given representation to the authorities concerned already and as submitted by them the same is not yet considered, it would be just and proper to direct the respondents to consider the representation along with any modified plan or suggested alignment given by the petitioners within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. WP(C) No.26254 of 2009 -:2:- 3. Needless to mention that respondent No.1 and/or 2 shall afford sufficient opportunity of hearing to an authorised representative of the petitioners. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. S.R. Bannurmath, Chief Justice. A.K. Basheer, Judge. ttb/vku