IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1705 of 2011 Date of decision : 09.05.2011 Kabal Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Nemo for respondent No.5. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel has filed the written statement in which it was mentioned that the indicated inquiry has already been conducted against respondent No.5. In view of the categoric stand taken by the State, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant writ petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to mention, if the petitioner, is aggrieved by the any subsequent order in this context, then he would be at liberty to avail his appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. May 09, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge