:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2439 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2439 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2439 OF 2008 Abdul Sattar Abdul Rehman ..Petitioner versus The Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board ..Respondents Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Parshurami for the Respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 3RD DECEMBER, 2008. DATE : 3RD DECEMBER, 2008. DATE : 3RD DECEMBER, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . It is not disputed before us that in furtherance of the Order of this Court dated 4.5.2006 in Writ Petition No. 1256 of 2006, flat Nos. 501 and 502 admeasuring 225 sq. ft and 228.32 sq. ft. respectively, which are adjacent to each other have been allotted to the petitioner. 2. The argument raised now is that the flats are not combined and Authorities are not issuing permission to combine the two flats together. :2: 3. We find no reason to pass any further directions except allowing liberty to the petitioner to move the Authorities including the respondents for permission to combine the flats as recorded in the Order of the Court. 4. In the event the petitioner does not accept the offer and physically take possession of those two flats within two weeks from today, the respondents will be at liberty to presume that the petitioner is not interested in accepting this offer. 5. After taking possession or even prior thereto, application for combining the flats may be moved, which shall be decided by the Authorities concerned including the respondents, expeditiously. 6. Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE :3: S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J.