HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18143 of 2011 Date : 01.07.2011 Between : Syed Shabuddin Khan. …..Petitioner And The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18143 of 2011 ORDER: Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner Sri Abhinand Kumar Shavili, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri N.Naveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 9 caveators, and as the other respondents are only proforma parties, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. This writ petition is filed questioning the notice, dated 13.06.2011, issued by the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar in Notice No.D/362/2007. The said notice is issued inviting objections on the claim of respondents 4 to 9 for mutation of their names in the Record of Rights. In this case, it is to be noticed that earlier, between the same parties, there was a revision pending before the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. In the aforesaid revision, the petitioner herein was respondent No.4 and respondents 4 to 9 herein, who are claiming purchase of property which is subject matter of dispute, from respondents 2 to 12, are impleaded as respondents 13 to 18. The revisional authority, by elaborate order dated 06.06.2011, passed in Case No.D1/4401/2006, while dismissing the revision petition, permitted the impleaded respondents i.e. respondents 4 to 9 herein to approach the Tahsildar for raising their claim for mutation of their names, with a further direction to the recording authority to examine their claims and mutate the subject land by following the procedure under the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. In fact, the present impugned notice is issued in pursuance of the aforesaid order of the revisional authority. The only objection of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though notices are issued to all others on the claim made by respondents 4 to 9, no notice is issued to the petitioner. But, it is to be noticed that as the petitioner was also a party before the revisional authority, if he is having any objections on the claim of respondents 4 to 9, he can as well raise such objections by responding to the impugned notice, dated 13.06.2011, issued in D/362/2007. As much as the petitioner was not issued with any notice, is the only objection, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to file his objections if any, in response to the notice dated 13.06.2011, and if any such objections are filed, I am sure the Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal, will consider the same while considering the claim of respondents 4 to 9 for mutation of their names, which is made pursuant to the orders of the revisional authority in the order, dated 06.06.2011. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 1st July 2011 ajr