IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25625 of 2010 1. KAILASH SAH 2. DINESH PODDAR --------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that dispute is there in between the co-accused Kiran Devi and complainant for a piece of land and house existing thereon in which it is said that Rs. 50,000/- was given to Kiran Devi but again demand continued and petitioners are alleged giving threatening rather dragging the complainant towards orchard. Allegation of offence under section 384 IPC is denied on two grounds that same was demanded by co-accused Kiran Devi for her claim over the house purchased by the complainant from her Sautan and next ground is that there is no delivery of any cash. There is no allegation of theft at all. A case is lodged on behalf of accused no.1 Kiran Devi about committing rape upon her by the complainant in which petitioners are also witnesses. Thus, having regard to the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Deepak Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai in Complaint Case No. 2057C/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)