IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40008 of 2010 SURESH RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 08-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the complainant in a case under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Although petitioner claims to be willing to keep the complainant wife with him but it appears that after having two children now the complainant is unable to bear the torture inflicted upon her. Considering the special responsibility of the petitioner as a husband, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. In case, petitioner surrenders in the court below, i.e. the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Trial No. 424/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No.2920-C/2007 within 10 weeks and satisfies the 2 court that he has compromised his differences with his wife, in that event, he shall be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the court below on the date of surrender of itself. For the period of ten weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in the connection with the aforesaid case. If cost is deposited, let this order be communicated to the concerned court by fax. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)