IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17898 of 2009 SHIV CHANDRA SAHNI, son of Kapileshwar Sahni, resident of village Lagama, P.S. Chatho, District Samastipur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.9.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The fact that the deceased, wife of the petitioner, was suffering from diarrhoea and vomiting and yet was not allowed to be checked up by any doctor prior to her death and that the family members were also not allowed to participate in her cremation, are itself sufficient to show that the husband petitioner for the time being does not deserve bail. The petitioner is in custody since 2.1.2009 and in that view of the matter, as the case of the petitioner has already been committed to the court of Sessions, this Court would direct the trial court to conclude the trial within a period of one year from today. In the event such trial is not concluded within the aforementioned period of one year on account of lach and lapse on the part of the prosecution, the petitioner will have the liberty initially 2 to move the trial court which will have to spell out the reasons for not concluding the trial, whereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. With the aforementioned observations, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/