,1 t g5$“‘nh " / @ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W3. (S)No, S376 2008 .f’fK/rishna kumar Dhurandhar aged 51 years Son of 1a1 Shri Dhurandhar Upper Division Teacher, Middle School Sirsakala, Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G. Versus ./ Petitioner ‘ 1. State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S.' Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / Respondents 2. District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) Dam - r; qw (cs: ) Writ getition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus/direction or any other apgrogriate writ ' 7n « ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wn't Petition (S) No. 5376 of 2008 Petitioner Krishna Knmar Dhurandhar Versus Respondents (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. State Government of Chhattisgarh 8a another o R D E R pm!) (Passed on this 12th day of March, 2O 10) Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order dated 3.9. 20,08 (Annexure P/ 1) the promotion order of the petitioner dated 18.8.2008 mm the post ofAssista‘nt Teacher] Head Master to the post of Upper Division Teacher, was cancelled without an'ording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State refers to the order dated 25¢ February, 2009 (Annexure R-3), passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 6490/2008 (R. L. Rathore Vs. State Government of Chhatisgarh 85 another) and submits that a show cause notice is required .to be issued, calling upon the petitioner to file reply thereon. The impugned order may be treated as recalled. Learned counsel appealing for the respondents/State further submits that a &esh order would be passed after considering the reply to the show cause notice, nled by the petitioner, in accordance with law, as the impugned order stands recalled pursuant to the show cause notice issued to the petitioner. In View of the foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition istands disposed of with the afore~stated ' liberty. No order as to costs. ,Satish K. Agnihotri 'Judge Sdl-