IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2895 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2895 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2895 OF 2005 Jhaman B. Mandhwani ... Petitioner V/s. Bank of India & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Arshad Shaikh i/b. M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for petitioner. Mr. Kusumakar Kaushik for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 10th November, 2006 : 10th November, 2006 : 10th November, 2006 P.C. . According to the respondents, whatever documents were in their possession have already been handed over to the petitioner on 08.11.2006. The case of the respondents is that earlier they had called on the petitioner to receive the document but he did not receive the same. According to the petitioner, there are other documents still to be given. If that be the case, it will be open to the petitioner to take appropriate proceedings including in the pending Consumer Redressal Proceedings. The counsel for the respondents points out that those proceedings have been rejected. 2. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]