IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13241 of 2011 Bhanu Pratap Chauhan Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 3 14-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that case of the petitioner has already been transferred from Muzaffarpur to Patna and presently, it is pending in the court of Special Judge (Vigilance), Patna. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application during course of the day. Allegedly, the petitioner took Rs 3,000/- as bribe and he was caught red handed taking the said bribe. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is in jail custody since 22.12.2010 and as a matter of fact, he has falsely been dragged in this case and no such occurrence as alleged in first information report, did ever take place. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, particularly, keeping in mind that the investigation of this case has already been completed, let the petitioner, namely, Bhanu Pratap Chauhan be released on bail on furnishing bail 2 bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 90 of 2010, Special Case No. 36 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Concerned Special Judge (Vigilance), Patna subject to condition that the petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months and if he fails to dos so on three consecutive dates, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and furthermore, the trial of the petitioner be concluded within the above-said period of nine months. A.K.Vishwakarma/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)