IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4280 of 2004 MANDODARI KUWAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 19.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This matter has been taken up on order of remand passed by the Division Bench in LPA No. 106 of 2005 vide order dated 21.2.2005. The primary reason for remand of the matter by the Division Bench to the Single Judge was that the original petitioner, namely, Sugreev Sharma had died on 6th November, 2004 but this fact was not pointed out to learned Single Judge when the order was passed. In the opinion of the Division Bench no order could be passed against a dead person. That is another aspect. So far the merit of the case is concerned learned Single Judge has already held that since the petitioner had already superannuated much prior to filing of the writ application there was no question of his regularization in service on the post of skilled artisan. So far as the claim of the monetary benefit this Court can only observe that the monetary benefit can only accrue provided regularization in service was made. Since no order of regularization was made, financial benefit cannot accrue. This writ application is misplaced and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)