1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4315/2008 Manoj Kumar Suraj Mal Sharma ..vs.. Recovery Officer, DRT Nagpur & anr. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Thakkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kumar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 16 th OCTOBER, 2008 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Respondent no. 1 though served is not present today also. 2. Mr. Thakkar, Advocate states that though Demand Draft of the petitioner has been accepted, the bid of the petitioner is not being considered and the Recovery Officer has orally stated that the orders in this respect will be required to be passed by the High Court. The learned counsel for respondent no. 2-Bank states that the Recovery Officer has permitted the petitioner to participate in the bid process and the auction will not be finalised behind his back.