IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.863 OF 2006. SUIT NO.863 OF 2006. SUIT NO.863 OF 2006. Vijay Chintaman Raul & Ors. ...Plaintiffs. V/s. Harischandra Pandurang Raul & Anr. ...Defendants. Mr.U.S.Jain i/b.Mr.Shashi K.Jain for the plaintiff. Mr.U.S.Kutty i/b.Mr.S.M.Shetty for the defendant no.1. Mr.Mungaokar, representative of Court Receiver present. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR J. DATE : 16TH JULY, 2007. P.C. :- 1. The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms signed by the parties and their advocates. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs states that the consent terms have been read over and explained to plaintiff no.3 and she has agreed to the same. The similar statement is made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant no.1 who has also signed it in Marathi. Defendant no. 1 is present in court. Plaintiff no. 1 and 2 are also present in the court. The undertakings contended in the consent terms are accepted. The Court Receiver shall stands discharged without passing accounts subject to his costs, charges and expenses. Refund as per rules.