VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1078 OF 2008 Smt. Louiza Francis Coutto @ Tina Coutto Petitioner Vs. Sr. Inspector of Police Respondents M.I.D.C. Police Stn. Mumbai & Ors. Ms. Betty D’Souza, for the Petitioner. Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, & A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J. DATE : AUGUST 4, 2008. PC :- . It appears that a case has been registered on the basis of a complaint that the accused presented some documents before the Government with respect to a piece of land and obtained certain orders by which the property was sold to a third person, although the property belonged to the complainant. Now, the petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that certain documents have been used for the sake of getting benefits, which prima-facie discloses the - 2 - case for investigation. It is for the investigation officer to come to the conclusion whether the documents alleged to have been used for the purpose of sale, were bogus and genuine or not. In these circumstances, no case is made out for quashing the FIR. In the result, petition is dismissed. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] Sd/- [ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]