IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 09-12-2010 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.26934 of 2010 Gojan Enterprises Private Limited rep. By its Directory, Authorised Signatory Mr.L.Sivakumar .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The Registering Officer cum Collector, under Indian Stamp Act, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 2.The Sub Registrar, Alandur, Kancheepuram District. .. Respondents. Prayer: This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to return the registered document No.201003365, dated 17.10.2010 in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.232/2 Part and 232/3 Part (Pymash No.289) T.S.No.59 Block 11 Ward F Income Tax Lane II Street, Adambakkam, Chennai 88, measuring about 7.5 cents (Approximately 3270 Sq.Feet) within the S.R.O. Alandur, Kancheepuram District to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.S.Gopinathan Additional Government Pleader O R D E R Heard Mr.S.Venkatesh, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as Mr.S.Gopinathan, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the issue arising for the consideration in the present writ petition had already been decided by this Court, in a batch of writ petitions, in S.Jayalakshmi V. The Government of Tamil Nadu and others, reported in 2003-1-L.W. 562. Thereafter, this Court has been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ passing a number of orders based on the order passed by this Court in the decision cited above. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents had not refuted the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned, the third respondent is directed to release the sale deed, dated 17.10.2010, which had already been registered as document No.201003365, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, without demanding additional stamp duty, if there are no other legal impediments for the release of the document concerned. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr/csh To 1.The Registering Officer cum Collector, under Indian Stamp Act, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 2.The Sub Registrar, Alandur, Kancheepuram District. 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.88634. 1 cc To Mr.S.Venkatesh, Advocate, SR.88345. Writ Petition No.26934 of 2010 TRM(CO) RVL 12.01.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/