IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2007 / 22ND ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 17075 of 2004(G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ V. CHAKRAPANI, MALIYEKAL CHIRAYIL, THATHAMPALLIL WARD, AVALUKUNNU P.O., ALLEPPEY. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SATHEESH RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, FREEDOM FIGHTERS' DIVISION, LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI-110 003. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (FFP.A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASST. S.G. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 17075/2004 G APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF THE ORDER NO. R.DIS 25864/74/F6 DT. 18/7/74 BY THE DIST. COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF SSS PENSION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DT. 25/3/98. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE PKC BY SRI. KUNJAN SUKUMARAN DT. 25/3/98. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DULY ATTESTED BY THE JUDICIAL IST CLASS MAGISTRATE, ALAPPUZHA DT. 27/12/99. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE NARC BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ALAPPUZHA. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE PKC BY SRI. H.K. CHAKRAPANI DT. 23/1/04. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.17075 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 13th July, 2007. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer :- “Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order, compelling the 2nd respondent to send his verification-cum-entitlement to pension report along with specific recommendation with regard to the eligibility of the petitioner to get the benefit of SSS pension and on receipt of the same the 1st respondent may also be directed to grant the benefit of SSS pension to the petitioner within a stipulated time.” In case the application filed by the petitioner has not so far been considered, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the same and submit an appropriate report to the first respondent within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that in the process, the petitioner will also be afforded an opportunity for hearing. Depending on the report thus submitted by the second respondent, action if any required will be taken by the first respondent, within another two months. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs OP NO. 2 KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- O.P. NO. OF 200 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 13th July, 2007.