IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 6102 of 2011. Decided on: 17.08.2011. Tek Chand. ….. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …… Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner. : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) A writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to allow the benefit of regular appointment in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. 20.04.1993, i.e., the date of award of J.B.T. Condensed Course Certificate alongwith consequential benefits of increments and seniority. (ii) That the respondents may also be directed to allow and pay honorarium/stipend in favour of the petitioner for the period of training undergone by the petitioner for award of J.B.T. Condensed Course 2 Certificate as allowed to similarly situated persons in the State of Himachal Pradesh.” 2. It is seen that the petitioner has made Annexure P-4, representation and the same is pending before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to look into Annexure P-4, representation and take action in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition. In case the petitioner requests for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. 3. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 17, 2011. (bhupender)