EN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. \1^ OF 2004 PETITIONERS : ^'^ <'• .^*' '<^ ^ A ^l.^ -/' •<r'v^<*' ^^y^ o^^^'^ < t. '** ^ -••' ^w" ^.{^••'' 6* Ajay Smgfa Parihar, S/0 Late Shri D.S. Parihar, Aged about 36 years, Rresently posted as Head Constable (No.577), Police Station Dliaaora, Disti-ict Jagdalpur (C.G.). Sscda Prasad Viswakarma, S/0 Kalu Prasad Viswakarma, Aged about 44 years, Presently posted as Head Constable (No.118), Police Station Bainiu', Police District Narayanpur (C.G.). Umashankar Shukla, S/0 Shyamlal Shukla, Aged about 30 years, Presently posted as Constable, Police Station Chhote Donger, Police District Narayanpzir (C.G.), Versus RESPONDENTS ^'Sg^ ^s^ • d^^rs^ ^o:^"v^ ?" Union oflndia Through the Secretary, Department of Personnel, PubUc Grievaace and Pension, Third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khari Market, New Delhi. State ofMadhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). State ofChliattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Buildmg, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Director General of Police, State ofChhattisgarh, Raipui (C.G.). 5. Inspector General of Police (Persoimel), Police Head Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 6. SupermterideatofPolice, . District Jagdalpur(Bastar)(C.G.). 7. Superintendent ofPolice, Police District Narayanpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ENDIA XI-HC-22 'S^ •*WWWfSWWWS, ' 1^3^^'q^l?;.'',^l:: : /;. ~;,:7^^^;;^^^M.P^196^2004.-; -_^: *ii*«'iia)iict>"'"'""""""""""'""^"""'"'W^ 200 an^F.qir R-li* 3)1^1 sh+iich '(•iTsa S.a.o/- w w 29.7.2004 Shri S.R.J.Jais'wal, counsel for Shri ViriayHarit Sr.Central Go of India on advance copy. Shri Vinod Shrivastava, Govt. copy. I.A.4602 of 2004 for urgent hes Heard.' Counsei for the petitioners W.P.No;578/2004, orriers have been said oF(3er is arinexRd-as Annexiire P- the order passed inW.P-1540/04 c: sjmilar orders be passed in this case £ Prayer is not ppposed by the ot Having considered the facts riiaterial on ^ecord and in view of thf the statement tnade by counsel for aimilarity, ,the action \of the State petitioners cannot be sustained an' relieving.- : The reepondents are directed daye from the date of productlon of a With thisobservation, this petil . Coneequently, M.W.P. 1766/2 dieposed pf. . ! ^ C.C. as^perrulea. +i^[^^^ ^i^^T^fs'^ ^ff^Ti ^? apOT 3ii^i ? |the petitioners, i|yt, Standing Counsel;for the Union Iftdvocate for the State on advance <ringis allowed. . ^ubmitted in similar mattef^ i.e., ttiassed on 21,4.2004. A Copy of the |7; I-eamed nounsel also prodliced |aiining similarity.. He prays that ^Iso/ . . : her side. |and circuinstances of the. case, order/ judgment cited above and the petitionefs at Bar regarding Authorities ih. not relieving the (i the petitioners are entitled for |:o_relieve the petitioriers within 15 l^opy of thie order. [ioa is disposed of. J004 and I.A.4603/04 also stand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge Fn-'ET^q-TES^r- 1-^