?— r\y IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CGt M.C.C.NO. [^ /2011 APPELLANT M/s. Akash Wires Q^ VERSUS RESPQNDENTS Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. 8& another APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF M.A. N0. 706/2006 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION The applicant most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as infra: ^ ^A^ ^y IN THE MATTEROF: M/SAKASH WIK^S 14-B, NBW INOUSTiyA^ ESTATE, RAWABHATA, RAIPURtC.G.) ; 1 '(\-'^&-ncSI&.cS GLA ^>e/y-: . yww'^€,G^Lyti ©t^ar- "• oi'|o&|u -• ...APPELLANT WDIA ^ ^ c}- /'^ VERSUS 1, BHARAT SANACHAR NIGAM LIMITED (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES) QFFICE OF THE CHIEF.GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, KERALA TELECOM CXRCLE, THIRUVANANTPURAM. 2. CHHAmSGARH INDUSTmAL FAQILITATION COUNQIL, QLD ADDRESS: SQNAKHAN BHAVAN, RING RQAD.RAnpm (G.G.) • NBW ADDRESS: DIREGTORATE OF INDUSTRIES NEAR L.I.C, BUILDING. RANDRI. RAIPUK (C.G.^ ...RESPONDEN^ APPLICANT RESPONDENTS H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CORAM: Hon'bleShri t.M. Quddusi, J. & Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. iVI.C.C.(PmNo.813of2011 HCC 12.^ Jz^ii Mte Akash Wires. Versus Bharat Sanchar Nlgam Ltd. & another. Appearance: Shri Sumesh Bajaj, counsd for the appilcant. ORAL ORDER (Oim/2011) order of the Court was passed by Fojfowing oral I. M. Quddusi. J. This is an applicatjon for restoration of M.A. No. 706/2006 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court on 28/02/2011. Application for exemptjon from filing certified copy is allowed. Ofilce has raised objection that the affidavit has not been filed by the dujy authorizeci agent. Learned counsel has filed Vakalatnama anct as such he is duly authorized by the appellant and he cannot be treated as iesser than duly authorized agent of the appellant. The deponent Shrl LiJssh Shrivastava js Cterk attached to the counsel as such his affjdavit is taken as true as mentioned duly authorized by the appelSant. Moreover learned counsel appearing for the party can authortee on behalf of the party in the present facts and circumstances therefore the office objection is over ruled. On due consideratlQn and for the reasons mentioned in the appllcatlon we are satisfied that the applicant has been abie to explain the non-appearance. Accordingly, the M.C.C. is allowed. M.A. No. 706/2006 is restored to its origina! number subject to correction of details of the parties in the instant M.C.C. by learned counsel for the appjlcant (M/s Akash Wires). Ltst the case after one week. ••<0 Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge