IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 3693 of 2011 Date of Decision : 14.12.2011 Bhajan Singh @ Fauji …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Gourav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) The only grievance of the petitioner is that he has already undergone total sentence awarded to him in a case FIR No.95 dated 31.7.1995 registered under Sections 302, 34, 323, 324, IPC at Police Station Chicka, District Kaithal and has been released from the jail and now again police is visiting his house to arrest him. Reply was filed by the State. Learned counsel for the State, while referring to Annexure R-1, has submitted that State Level Committee on 3.11.2010 pleased not to recommend the premature release of the life convict and has directed re-arrest of the petitioner to serve the sentence of the life imprisonment. In view of the contents of Annexure R-1 and opinion of the State Level Committee, nothing survives in the present revision petition. Dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) December 14, 2011 Judge mks