IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38069 of 2009 1. SACHIDA NAND PARIT @ SACHIDA NAND PANDIT 2. DHARMNATH PARIT @ DHARMNATH PANDIT 3. SANMUKHA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02 27.11.2009 Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this application, petitioner no.2, namely, Dharmnath Parit @ Dharmnath Pandit has been arrested and as such the application has become infructuous so far as the said petitioner is concerned. This Court records the aforesaid statement. Learned counsel for the petitioners after some argument wants to withdraw the application with respect to petitioner no.1, namely Sachida Nand Parit @ Sachida Nand Pandit ( husband) of the complainant. Permission is accorded. So far as the petitioner no.3, namely Sanmukha Devi is concerned, it is submitted that she is mother-in-law and there is no direct allegation against her. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.3. In the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioner no.3, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Gopalganj in connection with complaint case no.1673 of 2007 (Trial No. 3380 of 2007), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)