IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 679 OF 2010 SHRI. SNOWKON GONSALVES ... Petitioner Versus GOA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS MEMEBER SECRETARY, ... Respondent Mr. G. Teles, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 11th October, 2010 P.C.:- 1. We have perused the letter dated 11th January, 2010 impugned in this writ petition. The letter refers to the orders of this Court and also the orders of the Supreme Court. Copy of the order of the Supreme Court is not annexed to the petition. On being asked why the copy of the order of the Supreme Court is not produced, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is in possession of the copy and the petitioner can produce the copy, if necessary. 2. We feel that this is a deliberate attempt by the petitioner to hide the copy of the Supreme Court from being furnished to this Court, which cannot be tolerated. Hence, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition by annexing all the necessary copies. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.