Civil Revision No.102 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.102 of 2010 Date of decision : 11.1.2010 Gurvinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Sh. Rameshwar Dayal Singhal ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. R.L.Luthra, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. The petitioner, who is respondent-tenant in the petition pending before the learned Rent Controller, has a grievance that his evidence was inappropriately ordered to be closed by the learned Rent Controller vide impugned order dated 2.12.2009. It is apparent from a perusal of the impugned order that learned Rent Controller noticed that sufficient opportunities had already been afforded to the petitioner herein to adduce evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to argue that there is any factual inaccuracy in the above observation made by the learned Rent Controller. It was for the petitioner herein to place on record the copies of interim orders passed by the learned Rent Controller preceding the impugned order which would give an idea to this Court about whether sufficient opportunities had been granted to the petitioner herein or not. The rent petition under Civil Revision No.102 of 2010 -2- **** reference is pending since 2003. In that view of things, it is illogical for the petitioner herein to have a grievance that his evidence had been ordered to be closed for inappropriate reasons. This Court has no reason to doubt that the sufficient opportunities had been granted to the petitioner to adduce his evidence. In view of the foregoing discussion, the petition is held to be devoid of merit and is ordered to be dismissed in limine. January 11,2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE