IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD DATED: the 8th day of April, 2011. PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CRP. No. 1473 of 2011 Between: Lakshmisetti Krishna Kumari ..Petitioner and Dhilli Pitchaiah and others Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CRP. No. 1473 of 2011 O r d e r: This revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada passed in E.P.No. 347 of 2005 in O.S.No.2421of 2002, holding that the DHR is entitled to proceed with the sale of the property attached. 2. In the EP., the petitioner herein filed her counter denying the liability under the decree, contending that she did not inherit any property from her late husband, Suryanarayana; the EP schedule property is the assigned land; subsequently the land was assigned in her name on 9.2.2004 with a condition that the JDR is not entitled to alienate the said property, except for obtaining loan from a commercial bank and therefore the DHR is not entitled to proceed against the property. 3. Regarding the liability of the JDRs and the attached property held by the husband of the JDR, there was an issue and decided in the main suit holding that the estate of the deceased is in the hands of the JDRs as his legal heirs and are liable for realization of the debts borrowed by her husband. In the suit, itself, as it was already decided that the JDRs have inherited the estate of late Suryanarayana, they are liable to discharge the suit debt and without questioning the said finding recorded in the suit, which has become final, they cannot re-agitate the same n the execution proceedings. 4. In that view of the matter there are no merits in the revision and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. Dated:08-04-2011. *BVS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CRP (SR) No. 16770 of 2008 08—04--2011