;'.-1 IN THE KIGH COURT OF JUDlChTVSS: AT BILASpUR(CHHa.'mSGARH) MRIT PETmoN NO^S/Lf/02 OF 2003 ,. PETITIOKER Rajkunar Katarlya. son of S.bri Dhanjua Katariya, aged about 31 years presently posted as peon,C.G.Council of Saience.and Technology,,psniait Ravi Shankar 5'hukla Unlversity Campus,R&ipur,Dlstrict-Rsipur,(C.G.) V E: R S U S, RES.POWSENIS •^•< y ...•• '-^''"" ^e^-" ..-.^^" 1>S^"' C.G.Gouncil of Science anfl Technology.through its D.i.rector General.pandit Ravi Shankar S.hukla University campus,Ralpur,(C.G.} 2» M.P.Council of Sicience and Technology.through its Director General, Kisan Bhat<an,26,Arera Hills, Mother Teressa Road, Bhopal,(M.P.) 3. State of Ct-il-.attisgarh, through Secretary,Department of Science and Tfechnology,Q.K^».Bailcling, Mantralay.Raipur,(C.G.) 4« State of Madhya pradesh, through Seeretary.Depsrtmeat of SGience and Ted-snology.Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralay,Bhopal,(H.P.) MSIT PETITION UECSR &RTICLES. 226/22Z_OF_THB: COI-S.TITUT'ION OE- INDIA . B8--" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sta^e Bench; Hon'blc Mr, Justice SaUsh K. Agalhotrl. Writ Petition No. 2314 of2003 Pctitioner Regkumar Katanya Vcrsus Respondente C. G. CouncU & ofhers Shri Rajendta Tripafhi, Advocate for the petitfoner. Shri Amit Venna, Advocate for Respoiulent No. 1 and 2. Shri Panksq Shrivcistava, Panel lawyer for respondent No. 3. None for the Respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER ( 16d> Februaiy, 2006) The foUowing otder of the Court was passcd by Satteh K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Lcamed ootuasel appearing for fhe pefitfoxier subnate that the petitkfncr, who was working as Peon ia the Chhattisgarh Council of Sciencc and Techaology, Raipzir, is a penaanent resident of District- Bhopal ia the State of Madhya Pradesh. Hc has been aBocated to fhe State of Chliattisgarh aad he waats his reaUocation to fhe State of Madhya Pradcsh in the Madhya Rradesh Council of Science and Technology, BtiopaL Leamed couusel &r fhe petittoner, on. iastructiou, subauts fhat the petitioDjer be granted libarty to mate a reptesentation to llie respondents for Tedressal of his grievances. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondents have no objection to thc said submission. 2. In view offhe foregoing, fhe petition stands disposed offinalfy, with liberty to fhe petitioner to matre an appiopriate represeatation to the respondcats/authoritics conccmed, wifhin a period of two weeks fioin today, and the respondents/aufhorities are duected to coastder and decide fhe saine, in an objcctive inaiuier, in accoriance wifh law, wifhin a period of eight weeks foin fhe date ofieceipt ofthe representatton, ifany. Certified copy, as per Rutes. Thakur Sd/- 1 K. Judge