THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 986 OF 2011 DATED:22-11-2011 Between: Syed Nasiruddin Khan … Appellant And K. Ravinder Reddy and 20 others … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 986 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. According to the writ petitioners, they are in possession of an area of Acs.216.32 guntas in Survey Nos. 324 to 335 situate at Narkoda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They were apprehending forcible and illegal dispossession and, therefore, they preferred Original Suit Nos. 957 to 960 of 2006 which are pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy. 2. The learned trial Court granted an injunction against dispossession of the writ petitioners. That injunction was confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court. 3. Feeling aggrieved by the injunction granted in favour of the writ petitioners, the appellant preferred Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 29057-29060 of 2011 before the Supreme Court and the same are still pending. 4. Under these circumstances, the writ petitioners preferred a writ petition seeking necessary protection of their possession from the activities of the appellant and other unofficial respondents. 5. By an interim order dated 15-11-2011, a learned single Judge directed that as long as the orders of injunction are in force, it is the bounden duty of the police to grant aid in order to effectuate the order of injunction. Accordingly, the police was directed to give protection to the writ petitioners to prevent the appellant and other unofficial respondents from interfering with their possession. Writ Appeal No. 986 of 2011 Page 1 of 2 6. The appellant has preferred this writ appeal challenging the order passed by the learned single Judge. 7. We are of the view that the learned single Judge has not committed any error in granting police protection so that the orders of injunction are given full effect. There is a serious dispute between the parties and since there is an injunction which has been granted in favour of the writ petitioners and which has been confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court, we see no reason to disturb the view taken by the learned single Judge. 8. There is no merit in this writ appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. 9. The miscellaneous application is also dismissed. MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ SANJAY KUMAR, J 22-11-2011 ks Writ Appeal No. 986 of 2011 Page 2 of 2