IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.4653-M of 2010 Date of Decision:27.4.2010 Amarjit Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. J.J. Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 states that no compromise has been effected between the parties. In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that she may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one on merits. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 27.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE