;.',.;=?*!a-'..SEBK-i •'•"^^f^SS^s^^t^w^si's^f^s^aissss"?':^'^" C^ Uff-s^ 8' HON'BLES. B. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSI No. ^^) / 2011 PETITIONERS: Cy.^ ^t't/ / ^y. ^%y ^y -Y^// ,-••' •^~\.-'' ^0'/^A/ 'J- -y .•%•• ^'y ^ 1, 1. Smt. Aloka Pal, W/o Late Shri R.K. Pal, Aged about 54 years , Post- U.D.T., R/o Qr. No. P/13, Awantika Colony, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C. G. 2, Smt. Saroj Nath Habil, W/o Shri Mahendra Nath Habil, Aged about 58 years, Post- Assistant Teacher, R/o Shanti Nagar Ward, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. 3. Smt. Kamalwati Markam, W/o Shri Banshi Lal Markam, Aged about 57 years, Post- Head Master, R/o Qr. No. EWS-65, Housing Board Colony, Bodhghat, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. 4. Smt Renu Yadu, W/o Shri Suresh Yadu, Aged about 55 years, Post- U.D.T. R/o Mother Teresa Ward, Behind Gancsh Mandir, Shanti Nagar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. VERSUS l". State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofTribal Welfare, Ministry, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, C.G. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. *^'' 3. The District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioners named above beg to submit as under:- PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS : As mentioned in the cause title. RESPONDENTS: s ^3\[ J; •?^ 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THIS PETITION ISBEING MADE ^' , y ! ^^-s\ I ^ ^ i"^.«r ^!.,^'S^<^ "^>v ^y HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No. 971 of2011 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS Smt. Aloka Pal & Others. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETTnON UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CONS'lTrUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Sfari Alok Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for Ifae State/respondents. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 18tt day of Febroary, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for tfie petiti<Miers, on instructions, seeks peraiission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petitioners want to make representation to the respondent authorities in the light of several decisions passed by the Supreme Court as well as fhis Court. 2. Leamed eounsel appearing for olher side has no objection. 3. It is ordered aceordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdravm with the aforestated observations, ifso advised. Sdi- SattehK- "" Judge Amit