1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13579/2008. Smt.Sita Bai and Others. VERSUS Nathulal and Others. 30.03.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Ashok Kumar Pareek, for the petitioners. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned orders. Both the courts below have held that the possession of the land in dispute measuring 250 Sq.Yards is with the plaintiff/non-petitioner and the suit is one for the grant of permanent injunction. The learned court below has passed the order of injunction restraining the defendant/petitioner from dispossessing the plaintiff and for maintaining the status quo with regard to the land as provided under the order of the learned trial court dated 20.11.2007. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I am satisfied that the impugned orders passed by the learned trial court as well as by the learned appellate court maintaining the finding with regard to the possession, prima facie does not call for interference and cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 In the facts and circumstances, therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the plaintiff also should have been restrained from alienating and maintaining the status quo with regard to the possession of the land which is the subject matter in dispute. So far as the above prayer is concerned, it would be open for the petitioners to move an appropriate application before the learned trial court in this behalf and the learned trial court would decide the same in accordance with law. Subject to the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.