^" &^->ZT2<2— m TKE HONy»LEBU6BCCWKT CSrCBBATHSG.AEffilATMUi^tBK \^} ' ' PETSTIONER ^^ »* ^^5> ^ VE^a&s S/o' Late-^ti B-C.&ae^ee' R/o<^.N®.I@7^0ck. ". N<^41?yp€^Aip®^a^te®rii^ . tSMaa.-(C;.X3^. . 3 M.A^eaA Ifastem Ctoal •liBl&inAed^^ia^iu^C.e.) SJE.CJ..e&aEBBAii AsGa., Bi^ict^ms^-^ .4. E>Eaaaaa, 11 CeBiay, .S,£JC1^ £'&toet,SB«^@»(C.G.) Pterso^Nl ^fe^a^T.. S^-CJ.^KaBa^ •CeffieryJ^HAB<A I.taaiC.Xi^ ._1..—'-.^.AJ®?STMr~S!ElEE—^-^--——- ^'Sj%. /^g^'"% ^ y li^-.-. '^ '%.. ^^ j \^as^^ '^•^^^ -S-^ '-qpTloTqr, '^ft'^FT^, f®l<rfl<H^< ... ^M^^M WNI«ft •^200 3ff^T ^RW (^qt^<^T) ^^ ^T ^i°?» ^m<m^i^^N I^TO^ ^efN-3??^ ) SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shj 16-08-2010 Shri B. R. Chakraborty, counsel f(j) Heard. Case ofthe petitioner is that ev| service, his date of birth has always bee( Learned counsel for the petitionj notes, educational certificates, transfer 4 the records of Coa! Mines Provident the petitioner ?rsince he iiw^ injtially joined in itreatedas 16-02-1956. ?r refers to medical examination lertificate and the entries made in documents, date of birth of the petitionet further submitted that when the petitfoij Right to Information Act seeking disclosij the service records maintained by the r| 05-2010 (Annexure P-5) and 05-06-201 that the relevant records ofthe petitione| placed on record letter dated 22-01-19^ Duman Hill Colliery, in which, date of statedas 16-02-1956. Submission of learned counsel though, ail the records disclosed that th< 16-02-1956, vide notice dated 22-09-20- been informed that he is going to retire age ofsuperannuation. From the pleadings and the doci lappears that the service records of the Ivarious communications and other dc Ipetitioner has been recorded as 16-02-1i QhN?<ri^h 'W^f ^ "fe^ if^^K ^'stRR^l^l vastava, J. :und to submit that in atl these is recorded as 16-02-1956. It is |ier submitted applications under |re of date of birth as reoorded in ^spondents, vide tetter dated 05- 1|0 (Annexure P"6), it is informed are not received. Petitioner has |5 of Deputy Personal Manager, |)irth of the petitioner has been for the petitioner is that even date of birth of the petitioner is |Q (Annexure P-7), petitioner has |n 22-09-2010 upon attaining the [iments filed by the petitioner, it Ipetitioner are misplaced, but in ^uments, date of birth of the S|56. ^^f. ^^^[^ -FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. u ^, I- ;'-' ~y'- ^^XI-HC—78 ^^ "^l^ld^, ^•ill-H^iCo, [®|<r<l-H^< ^^^^^M^- ~^wwi ^b^ssh ^T^T "q^W (yit^^) ^"^.200 3??^T ^?T t^tToF ^ff ^TI^T'^T^JW s-4 -N, Tumane ^nw^^T^y^ <—r Accordingly, the respondents art enquiry with regard to the age of| consideration all the relevant docum^nts records maintained by the responden|s, existing guidelines relating to deterrrjination petitioner shali be decided on or retirement i.e.22-09-2010, subject to along with copy of petition within a wee| direoted to make due and proper the petitioner, after taking into and entries made in various nts, strictly in accordance with the of age. The case of the t^fore the date of hls proposed $ubmission of copy of this order |( in the office of respondent No.2. With the aforesaid direction, the Certified copy as per rules. |3etition is finaity disposed of ^wfe^T ^TO^ff ^ fe^ '(f^?R ^^TfiTH^T^T Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge