@(§ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. In the Matter of W.P.No.42®& [2003 1 PR ETITIONE Ashwini Kumar Sahu, aged about 21 years, sono of Late Shri Dashrath SahuWt resident of Civil Line, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). Versus DENTS 1) ' State of Chhattisgarh, through : Works Bhawan, Secretary, Public Department, D.K.S. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2) Chief Engineer, ‘Public Works Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, (Chhattisgarh). Raipur 3) Collector, (Chhattisgarh). Raigarh Executive Engineer (P.W. D . ) , Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 5) Sub Divisional Officer (Elect. And Mech.), Sub Division, Distt. Raigarh Raigarh, (Chhattisgarh). RESPON BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. 426% ,, ,ImtheMatteLoLm,Nro_# g UMON OE INDIA,: wHRoUGH : THE SECRETARYK DEPARI'MENT or pmscNNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANC‘E AND pERsoNNEL. THIRD FLooR Lemmy“ Bramm, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI. s'rATE OF m‘sDHyi‘A pRADESH THROUGH : THE SECRETARY. mspARwmmr cm TMBAL wELFmE, VALLABH BWAN, MADHYA pRADESH. Brion-L. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF' THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND [OR ANYa OTHER COMMAND OF LIKE NATURE HIGH CwRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wm Petition Nb; 1203 at 2003 Pe'fi'ricner Ad'Iwini Kumur Sd'nu Versus Respond¢Ms 5101c of Chhg't‘risgnrh md o1hers sanghaawh: Hon’blz Mr. Justice semi. L Agniw. Mrs Anju Ahujn, Deputy Govzmmem Advocutc for 'the Shh/respondents No. 1 1'0 5. Mr. 5.K.Beriml, Sfonding counsel for Union 0f India. ORDER (Passed on 28*" bay of Fabruary, 2007) The following order of 1h: Cour‘l’ um passed by swish K. W. J. The ‘fa'tlm' of ‘rh: pefifioner namely Shri Duiwafh Sdtu whlla working as Rollur Drivor in Public Works Deparfmen‘l', dicd on 01.02.1997 (Amre P-Z) in harness. At m meof awn of deceased 51m oushmh sahu; ma pefi'tioner was minor. The petitioner o‘rroinzd 1h: 09c of majority on 2197,2001 mmby m mm: angina for making appnsennon and for consideration of his case on fhe basis of compassionate appointment In fho moan‘lime, fhe Governnmrr of Chhoffisgnrh, by ifs cirwlar dafed 02.02.2006, directed all 'rhe deporfmenfs *o consider cases of all fhe eligible dependen -le9nl heir of ihe deceaqrrl employee, who ' 1. Preszi 1': Mr. AN.Bhnkin, Advocate for ihe pefi'i'ioner. died in harness be‘hwen 1.11.1997 To 31.10.2000 for campmiom'fe gromd. 4. Since *he pe‘fifionar n'H'ained majori'ry on 21.07.2001, fhe case of fhc pefifionér should be considered afred'i as per- ifs om circuhr do‘ted 02.02.2006 and dso in view of ‘rhe order passsd by fhis Court in Writ Peiifion No. 3879/2004 and ofhcr connec'ied mumrs on iiis own merit in accordance with law, within a pcriod of four weks from me dare of 'rhe represcntaiion, if so made. 5. For me reasons staicd above, inc writ pciifion stand; dispoied of. No orders as to cosis. ’Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn' Judge