^^ 3®nc? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ ^w ^y^^ z^y ^- y W.P. (S) N0. 2-9^0 / 2011 Seema Mandavi, D/o Shri M.R.Mandavi, 31yrs, Terminated Asst. Grade-III District Panchayat and Social Welfare Office, Dantewada, R/o Village Chitalanka, In front of Collector Bungalow, Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada-(C.G.) VERSUS / 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Manfralaya, Raipur / 2) The Collector, (Panchayat Branch) South Bastar, Dantewada-fC.G.) 3) The Dy.Director Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, South Bastar, Dantewada-fC.G.) o T PETITION U/A 226 & 22'LQ£THE_CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA i:'l "iSll Jlufe, ^o T^ "41'4l(r!''-1, ^ifl-y'lto, rs|cli-'-llj,< 1\). f- (& ) 1~0 . sn^wra^? (' ai^i^rfetw "?ftff <»R^t^^it^) Dsepti i^nwafCTsn^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 15-06-2011 Shri Prafuil N. Bharat. counsei This petition has been filed e( the Coilector by which the petitioner! <<t|ijff)iit-( 'wRifT fst;S 7?3^R ii- sfim ;-:T^[ Shrivastava, J. forthe petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advj?cate Generai for the State/respondents 1 to 3 on advance copy. ejgainst order dated 27/10/10 passed by 1 has been dismissed from services in a departmental enquiry. find that the petitioner, who i^ a Government Servant is governed by the provisions contained in Chhattisg^rh Civii Services (Ciassification, Control & Appeai) Rules, 1966 (for short 'ttfe rutes of 1966'), wherein, there is an alternative and efficacious remedv o| the order of the disciplinary authority.1 petitioner has filed this writ petition b| ordinary reason to entertain this aiternative remedy of appeai. Therefore, 1 am not inclined to| is reserved to the petitioner to prefer the rules of 1966, before a constituted f departmental statatory appeal against With the aforesaid iiberty, the rietition is finatly disposed off. Without availing remedy of appeat, the efore this Court. 1 do not find any extra petition, when the petitioner has an entertain this petition. However, liberty departmental appeal, as provided under appellate authority. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge