IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 27091 of 2011(J) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ANI RAJAN.A., LIBRARY ATTENDER (ON SUSPENSION), S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM, RESIDING AT KURUMBOLIL MEKKETHARA, ALUMKADAVU PO, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. SENIOR JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM - 671 571. 4. THE CHAIRMAN, GOVERNING BODY, S.N.POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM - 691 571. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.A. FAYAZ R3 & R4 BY ADV.SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.27091/2011 J APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD. 29/10/2010. P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19933/2011 DTD. 20/09/2011. P3: COY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.21/9/2011. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 18/09/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 27091 of 2011-J - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner who has been working as Library Attender, was suspended by the fourth respondent for certain misconduct. The disciplinary enquiry was being proceeded with also. In this writ petition, the petitioner has raised two claims, viz. one for payment of subsistence allowance and the other for payment of salary for the period from March 2010 to October, 2010. 2. Learned counsel for the fourth respondent submitted that on completion of the disciplinary proceedings, the petitioner has been reinstated in service with a minor punishment. Therefore, all the aspects will be considered along with the question of regularisation of the period of suspension and appropriate action will be taken in the matter without delay. The same is recorded. In that view of the matter, respondents 3 and 4 will see that eligible benefits of the petitioner are disbursed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/