In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1195/2010 Smt. Chando Devi & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 4.3.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Chaudhari Shri Pankaj Gupta, for petitioners. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor. Brief facts of the case are that on 5.11.2009 complainant Banwari Lal lodged a report and alleged that the petitioners along with many other named persons inflicted injuries on the body of his brother Nathu Ram on 4.11.2009 and when other persons came to rescue him, Chhaju Ram, Kamlesh, Jagdish, Pappu, Babu Lal and Har Lal were also beaten by Barchhi, lathies etc. An FIR No. 131/09 was registered u/s 143, 341 and 323, IPC and during investigation, section 326, IPC was added. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners and members of their families sustained injuries which were inflicted by complainant and his party and prior FIR was lodged by the petitioners' side and only one injury caused by sharp edged weapon is grievous which has not been inflicted by the petitioners who are ladies, may be enlarged on anticipatory bail whereas learned Public Persecutor submitted that looking to the number of injuries inflicted on the body of many persons, this bail application may be rejected. I have perused the case diary and found that many persons sustained injuries in this scuffle. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail, merely because; the FIR has been lodged by the petitioners' 2 side prior to this FIR. Hence, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (K.S. Chaudhari),J. chauhan/