IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32571 of 2008 ANAND KUMAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.8.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 302 of the IPC and appears in custody since 5.2.2008. The allegation is that some one came to the house of the informant and took his son away. The contention is that the petitioner has not been put on test identification parade and the further contention is that the only circumstance comes from the statement of the wife of the deceased indicating that the deceased had narrated to her about the demand of extortion money by this petitioner. The contention in this context is that had it been so, then the fact could be mentioned in the FIR itself. Regard being had to the above facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Gopalganj in Hathua P.S.Case no.25 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )