IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16826 of 2009 1. SHIVJEE SAH S/O LATE PARMESHWAR SAH VILL- CHHOTI MARAI, HAJIPUR, P.S. HAJIPUR TOWN, DISTT. VAISHALI Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, HAJIPUR 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, HAJIPUR 4. JUNIOR ENGINEER BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, HAJIPUR ----------- 2. 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Bihar State Electricity Board. In the dispute with regard to the Electricity bill raised, the petitioner has already represented on 5.10.2009 which is stated not to have been considered. The application is disposed with directions to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose it off by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and circulars of the Board within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the fresh order, his remedy shall lie before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003. Fairness on part of the Board requires it to act reasonably by no coercive action till such time the 2 representation of the petitioner is not disposed off in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)