IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 768 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2008 SMT. SANDHYA S. KAMAT ... Applicant Versus SHRI. BYRON A. XAVIER ... Respondent Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. Abhijeet A. Kamat,Additional Government Advocate for the applicant. Ms. A. Razaq,Advocate for the respondent No.4. Mr. E. O. Mendes, Advocate for the original petitioner. Coram:- B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 8th April, 2009 P.C. Heard. Perused the orders dated 18th March, 2008 and 9th September, 2008. On 18/03/2008, this Court has noted assurance given by the respondent No.2 Director and on 09/09/2008, the said assurance has been construed as assurance given by the respondent No.3 Deputy Director. In view of this, certain observations have been made in para 5 and 7 of the order dated 09/09/2008. The learned Advocate General has pointed out that on 20.5.2008, the Director communicated the orders of this Court and requirement of taking action to the respondent No.3 and the respondent No.3 got the same on 23.05.2008 and on next day, she issued necessary communication. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that though the grievance made by the petitioner, is still not ventilated, considering the above facts, he has no objection if the adverse observations are removed. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.4, states that she has also no objection with regard to the same. 4. In view of the above facts, the observations made in the order dated 09.09.2008, against the present applicant, are expunged. The application is allowed. B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA