IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1166 of 2009 Sudhir Singh @ Sudhir Kumar Singh, son of late Nand Kishore Singh, resident of Village-Johaja, P.S.-Baheri, District-Darbhanga. ..............Opposite Party/petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Renu Devi wife of Sudhir Kumar Singh, at present resident of Village- Neema, P.S.-Sakari, District-Madhubani. 3. Ayush Kumar Singh son of Sudhir Kumar Singh. 4. Kajal Kumari daughter of Sudhir Kumar Singh. Opposite Party no. 2 and 3 are minor under the guardian ship of their mother opposite party no. 1. At present resident of Village-Neema, P.S.-Sakari, District- Madhubani. ..........Applicants/Opposite Parties ----------- 02 18.08.2011 The petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against the order dated 05.05.2009, passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani, in M.R. Case No. 87 of 2008, by which he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- for each child i.e. totally Rs. 1,000/- per month. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application to raise his grievance before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhubani, in accordance with law. The prayer is allowed. This petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Safik (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)