IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12035 of 2008 RAJEEV SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arvind Kumar No.1, G.P. XVII For the Respondent no. 3: Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate ----------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 17th September, 2008. The petitioner claims to be Member, Panchayat Samiti, Modanganj. By this writ petition, filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, he has prayed for issuance of a direction to the State Government and its authorities to construct Block Resources Centre at a place recommended by Three Men Committee constituted by the District Magistrate, Jehanabad. 2. According to the petitioner, the state government has formulated a scheme for training of teachers (male and female) at block level and for that, Block Resources Centre is to be constructed. The petitioner has averred that in this connection, the State Project Director has framed the guidelines which has been circulated to the District Magistrates including the District Magistrate, Jehanabad. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad is said to have constituted a Three Men Committee for selection of the place for construction of Block Resources Centre. The Three Men Committee came to the conclusion that Block Resources Centre should be built in front of Middle School, - 2 - Charui in land bearing khata no. 267, khesra no. 593 but because of political pressure, the Block Resources Centre is sought to be constructed at a different place. 3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent nos. 5 and 6. These respondents have not disputed the guidelines framed by the Project Director. Rather, these respondents stated that as per the said guidelines, as far as possible, the Block Resources Centre should be located in the Block headquarter. It is stated that Block Headquarters are situated at Modanganj and Block Resources Centre is being constructed at Modanganj. 4. Since the guidelines provide that as far as possible, the Block Resources Centre should be located at block headquarters and in the light of the said guidelines the Block Resources Centre is being constructed at the block headquarters i.e. Modanganj; the subject matter does not justify the interference by this court. Moreover, issue like this i.e., about location of Block resources Centre cannot be made amenable to judicial review. 5. Writ petition is liable to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/