IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.49 of 2008 1.Sanjay Kumar Singh, S/O Shri Naresh Prasad Singh, resident of village- Gond Ram, P.S. Basnahi, P.O. Sahsaul, Anchal- Sonbarsa Rah, District- Saharsa 2.Urmila Jha, W/O Shri Basuki Nath Jha, resident of village Khajuraha, Anchal- Sonbarsa Raj, P.O. Khajuraha, P.S. Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa 3.Ugendra Jha, S/O Late Jirekhan Jha, resident of village Khajuraha, P.S. Sonbarsa Raj, P.O. Khajuraha, Anchal- Sonbarsa Raj via Mungwar, District- Saharsa ……………. Petitioners Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 2.The Deputy Development Commissioner, Saharsa, At + P.O.+ District- Saharsa 3.The District Superintendent of Education, Saharsa, At + P.O.+ District- Saharsa 4.The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 5.The Block Development Officer, Sonbarsa Raj, At+ P.O. Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa 6.The Block Education Officer, Sonbarsa Raj, At+ P.O. Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa 7.Jamsed Alam S/O Late Chhangali Ansari, resident of village- Sonbarsa Raj, P.O. Sonbarsa Raj, Anchal Sonbarsa Rah, District- Saharsa 8.Smt.Parmila Kumari W/O Suman Ram, resident of village Manori, Anchal- Sonbarsa Raj, P.O. + P.S.- Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa, at present member of Selection Committee of Prakhand Teachers of Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa 9.Murari Kumar Singh, S/O Kameshwar Singh, resident of village Mangwar, P.O. Mangwar, P.S. Basnahi, Anchal Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa 10.Panna Kumar Singh S/O Sarda Singh, resident of village Mangwar, P.O. Mangwar, P.S. Basnahi, Anchal- Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa 11.Nibha Kumari, daughter of Braj Kishore Singh, resident of village Biratpur, P.O. Biratpur, P.S. Sonbarsa Raj via Mangwar, District- Saharsa. ………….. Respondents. ----------- 2. 23/08/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their employment. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of her grievances. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner within one month, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed therewith, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced, and other relevant records and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)