IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6666 of 2008 1. VIJAY KUMAR 2. BIRENDRA KUMAR, 3. AJAI KUMAR, ALL SONS OF LATE RAM KISHUN RAM @ RAM KRISHNA RAM, 4. BHAGMANI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAM KISHUN RAM, 5. SINGHASINI DEVI, WIFE OF BIRENDRA KUMAR, ALL RESIDENTS OF WARD NO.14, BHABHUA, P.O. & P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR. --PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PHULJHARI KUER (CLAIMING HERSELF TO BE WIFE OF LATE RAM KISHUN RAM), RESIDENT OF WARD NO.14, P.O. & P.S. BHABHUA, DIST-KAIMUR. --OPP.PARTIES. ______ FOR THE PETITIONERS : M/S RAMA KANT SHARMA Sr. Advocate & NARENDRA KR. SINGH FOR OPP.PARTY NO. : MR. KUMAR SUNIL 3 23.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and opposite party. This application has been filed for quashing of the order of the Sessions Judge, Bhabhua, dated 3rd December, 2007 passed in Cr.Rev. no. 157 of 2007 confirming order of court below dated 3rd July, 2007 rejecting prayer of discharge made by the petitioners in the Complaint Case no. 704 of 2005 in Trial no. 1495 of 2007. 2 It is submitted at the Bar that after framing the charges trial has already commenced before the court below. Considering the stage and nature of allegation leveled in the application besides the documents filed on behalf of the petitioners challenging the very rights of the complainant- opposite party, it seems desirable that proceedings before the court below be expedited and disposed of at the earliest. The learned counsel agree to co-operate in the court below for early disposal of the case. Taking into consideration of such aspects the court below is directed to proceed expeditiously and preferably conclude the trial within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners are at liberty to agitate all three points before the trial court which shall be considered without being any prejudiced due to non- interference by the instant order. With this observation and liberty, the application stands disposed of. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad