1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Crl. Miscellaneous Petition No.446/2010 (Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of Order : 15.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.Amrit Prasad Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Fauzdar, PP. By the Court: By this miscellaneous petition, the order of cognizance has been challenged. It is a settled law that an order of cognizance is not an interlocutory order, thus the revision petition lies under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not given any reason as to why the revision petition has not been maintained and the jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by maintaining a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The only ground taken is that a similar petition has been admitted by this Court wherein an interim order has also been passed. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The interim order passed by this Court is not binding to other coordinate Bench. This is more so when this Court has raised a question to the learned counsel for the petitioner that as to why the revision petition has not been maintained against the order of 2 cognizance more so when the law on the issue is settled that order of cognizance is not interlocutory order, hence the revision petition is maintainable. Since, no justification is coming forward for not maintaining the revision petition, I am not inclined to entertain this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., hence the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to maintain a revision petition as per the provisions of law. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.16