1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 1015 of 2007 SURENDRA SINGH V/S STATE & ORS Mr. MS PANWAR, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. BL BHATI, for the respondent Date of Order : 11.1.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order. The learned Single Judge has clearly considered the contentions of the raised by the appellant including, the contention about his having been initially appointed by the District Judge, and then his services having been discontinued by the learned Civil Judge. It has been found, that the appointment of the petitioner, from inception is void ab initio, being de hors the rules. It was found, that as such no right accrues to the petitioner for continuing in the service. Then, it was also been found that the appointment of the petitioner was purely on adhoc basis, and the term of appointment was extended for a period of one month by learned Civil Judge by order dated 01.05.2002, 2/2 and on expiry of the period aforesaid, the petitioner was relieved from duty. Considering this, it was found, that the petitioner having been got his services extended under the orders of the learned Civil Judge, cannot complaint on the count of his services being discontinued by learned Civil Judge. In our view, the findings do not require any interference in our appellate jurisdiction, rather, the findings are in line with the principle propounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka & Ors. VS. Uma Devi & Ors. JT 2006(4) SC 420. Thus, we do not find any merit in this appeal, and therefore, the same is dismissed. ( MOHAMMAD RAFIQ ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. preety