IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32023 of 2010 MANTOSH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was granted regular bail on 2.7.2010 in Cr. Misc. no. 22259 of 2010 with an observation that he was to be released if he had no antecedent. This application has been field for modification of that order stating that he has one antecedent in Barauni Rail P.S. Case No. 6 of 2010 under Section 379 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly acknowledges that it also relates to alleged theft of a motorcycle. The petitioner is stated to have been enlarged on bail therein. It is submitted that the petitioner has now remained in custody since 20.1.2010. Thus the prayer for modification. The Court queried from the counsel that if bail were to be granted, in nature of the allegation, in view of the antecedent why should the conditions for bail be not modified. Learned counsel submits that it may not be done. Having considered the facts and 2 circumstances of the case in its entirety, that the petitioner has an antecedent of a similar nature, the period of custody in the present allegations, the order dated 2.7.2010 is modified to the extent that the value of the bail bonds is increased to Rs. 30,000/- (thirty thousand) in context of Phulwaria P.S. Case No. 6 of 2010 pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. Both the sureties must be his father and mother respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds to be verified through the local police before final acceptance. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)