Review Petition No. 33 of 2009 10.05.2010 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General and Mr. P. M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. D. K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Ms. Monika Shukla, Advocate, vice Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. In this petition the petitioner has relied upon letters dated 17.6.1988 (Annexure P-2), 11.8.1988 and 2.11.1988. In the original proceedings the said letters had not been placed on record either by the petitioner or the respondents. Be that as it may be, this Court has held that Rules do not require that the candidate must have experience in teaching and that the petitioner’s case is based on erroneous interpretation of the said Rules. Hence no case for interference is made out. The present petition for review is dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 10, 2010 (PK)