IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12858 of 2010 EKRAMUL HAQUE @ AKRAM @ SHAHIL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------- 02. 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. This case instituted against unknown persons in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 03 of 2010 for offences under Sections 363, 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner’s name emerged during investigation as the person who was involved in taking the minor daughter of the informant who was recovered along with petitioner two days after the occurrence in her statement under Section 161 and 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code respectively Annexures 2/1 and 3 has stated against the petitioner. It is submitted that in fact the petitioner and the victim both on sweet relationship since before and now the victim has started changing her stand. Considering the facts and circumstances for the present, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, prayer is refused. Simultaneously, the courts below are directed to proceed expeditiously and petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer before the trial court itself after examination of the victim who may preferably be the first prosecution witness. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)