IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2008 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 1031 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.36591/2007 Dated 08/02/2008 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER --------------------- ANNAMMA JOSEPH, CHIRAPARAMBIL HOUSE ARATTUVAZHI WARD, ALAPPUZHA (SWEEPER, WAREHOUSE, KERALA BEVERAGE CORPORATION LTD., ALAPPUZHA) BY ADV. SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER SMT.DAYA K. PANICKER RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M & M) CORPORATION LTD. SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT MANAGER KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LTD. ALAPPUZHA WAREHOUSE, ALAPPUZHA FOR R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BENNY GERVASIS FOR R2,3 BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ===================== W.A.No.1031 of 2008 ===================== Dated this the 26th day of May, 2008. JUDGMENT Koshy,J. After the direction in the judgment in O.P.No.21971 of 2002, the recruitment rules were framed by the respondents Corporation and it was approved by the Government by G.O.(MS) No.8/07/TD dated 12.1.2007. According to the above, sweeper post has to be filled up through candidates sponsored by employment exchange. Even though the petitioner was continuing on daily wages as sweeper, her name was not sponsored and one T.K.Subadra was selected and appointed as full time sweeper. Consequently, the petitioner's temporary employment was not continued. At the time of earlier judgment, no rules were framed. Now permanent appointments were made WA 1031/08 -: 2 :- as per the rules and person who was appointed was not impleaded in this case. In these circumstances, we are of the view that no interference is called for in the impugned judgment. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. J.B.Koshy, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 27/5