IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2007 Shri Jethanand Lalchand Tekchandani .. Applicant. Versus Shri Chandresh P. Goretela & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.G.V.Pandya i/b.Avinath R.Rasal for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 16th April, 2008. DATE : 16th April, 2008. DATE : 16th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on both sides. 2. Learned Counsel Mr.G.V.Pandya being aggrieved by the order of acquittal of accused No.1 dated 3rd February, 2005, has filed this revision application. 3. Perused the evidence on record. Two witnesses, namely; Mr.Jethanand and Suresh Berde have been examined in support of the prosecution. Having gone through their evidence, I am satisfied that the ultimate conclusions drawn by the learned Trial Judge were right thereby acquitting the accused No.1. The evidence given by Jethanand is not sufficient to hold the accused No.1 guilty and the same is the position with reference to the evidence of Suresh Berde. 4. In my considered view, no interference with the impugned order is called for in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, revision is rejected. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)