1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 336 OF 2009 Vishnu s/o. Devidasrao Saste .. Petitioner Versus The Tahsildar/Presiding Officer, Tahsildar Office, Mantha, District Jalna and others. .. Respondents ---- Mr. V.D. Sonawane, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 7. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 24TH JUNE, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1. By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the concurrent finding of fact arrived at by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nasik, vide order dated 22/10/2008, thereby rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment and order dated 27th August, 2008, passed by the Additional Collector, Jalna, vide which the dispute filed by the petitioner challenging the No Confidence motion, passed in the meeting dated 7th June, 2008, came to be rejected. 2 2. From the perusal of the record, it reveals that 6 members of the Gram Panchayat had given a proposal for considering the No Confidence Motion on 2/6/2008. , Accordingly, a meeting was conveyed on 7th June, 2008. IN the said meeting, 7 members including the petitioner were present and the No Confidence Motion was passed by a majority of 6 votes. Since the petitioner himself was present in the meeting, it cannot be said that any prejudice was caused to him. 3. In any event, the petitioner has lost confidence of 6 members in a Gram Panchayat of 9 members. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, rejected. [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/