IN THE HON’BIE HIGH COURT OF ‘CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) V Writ Petition (Service) No. 4M lé 0i 2008. PETITIONER :- Smt. Diljeet Singh Saluja, wife ofLate Surjit Singh Saluja, agad about 48 years, Resident of Kirodimal Complex, Near Sai Mandir, Aghanpur, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS . State of Chhattisg‘arh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E..Road, Raipur (Chhattiggarh), Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Jagdalpur, Bastar (Chhattisgarh). PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mmfiwm amwm Mr. Jusfice Dhirendra Mishra (service) No.4426/08 (Pe‘rifion under Ar1 .226 of Consfi’ru’rion of India) PE‘HTIONER -Ver'SL RESPONDENTS 17.12.2008 Mr. H.B. Agarwal, Sr‘. Adv ‘rhe pe‘ri‘rioner. Mr‘. A. Sao, Govt Advocafe Heard. The pefifioner has filed ‘rh for- The Sfa‘re. a insTanT pe‘h’fion for The following relief:- “The Hon'ble Court may l<indly be pleased To allow The peTi’rion by direc’ring respondem‘ no.2 by making suitable order salary, furfrher fhe wi’rhhe and from January, 2008 h life smoothly." Smf. Diljeel’ Singh Salujo, wife of Late Surji‘r Singh saluja, aged about 48 years, residen’r of Secre‘l‘ary, School Educcn‘ion Deporfmenf, Manfrolayo, D.KS. Bhawan, GE. Road, Raipur (Chho’n‘isgorh) Tribal Jadgalpur, Assisfant Commissioner, Developmenf Department, Bas’rar (ChhaTTisgarh)_ to post the petitioner to any vacant place, in writing, so Thaf she may ge‘r regular d salary for the month of December, 2007 Till da’re be paid, so fha’r she can pull her ocate with Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate for ‘ Kirodimal Complex, Near Sai Mandir, Aghanpur, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar :Chhattisgarh) S— 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the ‘pe’rifion is disposed of with represen‘rafion before respondem‘ peTi'rion, along wiTh cerfified copy such represem‘a‘rion being made, T The respondem‘ No.2 within a perio‘ represenTaTion in accordance wiTh l Cer’rified copy as per rules. Learned counsel for The discharging her du‘ries regular'ly as she was paid regular salary, howev date she has not been paid her representations for redressal of l considered and decided and ‘rhe pe the las’r 13 mon’rhs. Mr. Arun Sac, learned coun pe‘ri‘rioner files fresh represen‘ra’ri week from today before responde decided by respondent No.2 within Jerificafion in accordance wi’rh iaw. In view of The submissions Ii pefi'rioner submi'rs fha‘r 1'he peTiTioner is per directions of the superior officers and er, from the month of December, 2007 tii salary.‘ The petitioner submitted severa ier grievances, but the same has not been titioner has been deprived of her salary for sel for the State submits that in case the on for redressal of her grievances within a nt No.2, the same shall be considered and a further period of three weeks after due 'nade by learned counsel for the State, this berty to 'the petitioner to make fresh \lo.2, raising all the grievances raised in this of this order within a week from today. On he same shall be considered and decided by j of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of the 1W . i . 8d]- Dhirendra Mishra Judge [Witt éfa'h