HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR.M.P. N0. 17/2011 PETITIONERS VERSUS RESPONDENTS M/s K.S. Oils Limited, Tilak Road, Datpura Morena, Through Manager Dilip Taraj, S/o Shri S.N. Taraj aged about 32 years, R/o T.R. Puram, Morena, Police Stadon and District Morena (M.P.). Omprakash Garg Son of Late Totaram Garg, aged about 68 years, Mohanlal Garg Son of Late Totaram Garg, aged about 65 years, Govind Prasad Garg Son of Late Totaram Garg, aged about 62 years, Gopaldas Garg Son of Late Toataram Garg, aged about 60 years, Rameshchand Garg Son of Late Toataram Garg, aged about 5 I years Petitioners No. 2 to 6 are Directors of K.S. Oils Limited Morena and Residents K.S. KOTHI Near Mela GrounEl, filorena, Police Station and DistrictMorena (M.P.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Deputy Director, Food and Medicine Administratiori,.Raipur (C.G.). 2. Anant Kumar Kulshreshtha Son of Late Babulal Kulshreshtha, Resident ofMorena (M.P.) Norainee 3. Bharat Lal Son of Baraturam Sahu, aged about 30 years, In charge and Nominee Firni Sahu Kirana Store, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur, Police Station Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Gautam Chand Jain Son of Late Sampatraj Jain, Resident of Gudhiyari, Raipur, Firm M/s Arihant Traders Gudhiyari, Raipur (C.G.). 5. Jugal Kishore Son of Premnarayan Agrawal, Partner and Nominee Firm M/s. Premnarayan Ramsunder Gudhiyari, Raipur (C.G.). PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 1973. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the respondent No. 1 /State. None for the respondents No. 2 to 5 not noticed. "2-- c<% ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 20/01/2011) 1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'fhe Code>) petitioners have prayed for quashment of criminal proceeding pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in criminal case No. 1662/06 under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 order dated 15/7/09.and order dated 22/1/2010 passed by Sessions Judge, Raipurin criminal revision No. 119/2009. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioners subraits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to comply the provisions of Rule 12 (B) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and to Ele appropriate application before the Court concerned. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- - T.P. Sharma Judge