1 CA5086,5182/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5086 OF 2011 1. Sarjerao s/o Bhagwanrao Tandale 2. Shriram s/o Bhujang Aghav Applicants V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra Respondent Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the applicants Shri D.R. Kale, Advocate for the respondent / State WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5182 OF 2011 Babu Shivram Tandale Applicant V E R S U S 1. Sarjerao s/o Bhagwanrao Tandale 2. Shriram s/o Bhujang Aghav 3. The State of Maharashtra Respondents Shri A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the applicant Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 Shri D.R. Kale, Advocate for the respondent No.3 / State CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 29th November, 2011 PER COURT : 1. The applicants in C.A. No. 5086 of 2011 apprehend arrest in connection with CR No. 142 of 2011, registered with Rural Police Station, Beed, Taluka and District Beed. 2. By C.A. No. 5182 of 2011, Babu s/o Shivram Tandale, the 2 CA5086,5182/11 complainant, wants to assist the A.P.P. Said application can be granted and is disposed of accordingly. 3. Heard learned Advocates of both sides. 4. Both the applicants are alleged to have used sticks in the alleged offence. The injury certificates are produced on record. Keshav, Sujanabai and Udhav have suffered injuries in the nature of contusion and abrasion. The police have claimed that the offence under Section 326 of the India Penal Code is made out. On perusing the medical certificates, it is difficult to accept that the injuries suffered by the victims could be termed as grievous hurt. 5. The learned Advocate Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, appearing for the complainant opposed the anticipatory bail application on the ground that the present applicants have criminal antecedents, and therefore, if they are granted anticipatory bail, that would give wrong signal in the society. 6. After having considered the rival submission, I am inclined to observe, of-course prima facie, that the injuries suffered by the victims cannot be termed as grievous. There is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicants. They can be put to terms. Hence, following order is passed to dispose of the application : 3 CA5086,5182/11 ORDER A. In the event of arrest of any of the applicants in CR No. 142 of 2011, registered with Rural Police Station, Beed, said applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with one surety in the like amount. Said applicant will have to furnish P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand). B. Both the applicants to report to the concerned police station firstly on 2nd December, 2011 and thereafter on every Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 04.00 p.m. till filing of the charge-sheet and on every second Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 04.00 p.m. for a period of six months from the date of filing of the charge-sheet. ( R.Y. GANOO, J. ) SRM/29/11/11