IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44874 of 2009 NARESH PRASAD SON OF LATE PRASADI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE –SATAUA BELDARI, P.S.- GIRIYAK, DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILANCE. ----------- 2 11/01/2010 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Vigilance. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 7/8/13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Allegation is that the petitioner has kept Rs. 10,000/- in his pocket after the amount was paid to accused Naresh Prasad A.S.I. which he got from the Complainant Raj Kumar Ram as bribe. The said amount was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Submission is that the petitioner is at his house at the time of occurrence. The place from where the seizure was made is the shop of the petitioner which he has owned in the name of his wife through a registered sale deed dated 21.7.1997. The petitioner himself is a victim of circumstances. He has not demanded any money and he is not in a position to do any favour to any person. Learned counsel for the Vigilance has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance-1 Patna in connection with Special Case No. 90 of 2009 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 113 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)