c ^ I- ,i^> ^ Ol¥islon IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BIIASPUR First Appeal ivshankar Delikar, Aged 50 years, /^ S/0 Ramdhin Delikar, R/0 Gumdutta Colony, NehmNagar, Raipur (CG) Versus 1 Smt Anita Delikar, Aged 30 years, Appellant/ Applicant y W/0 Shivshankar Delikar, D/OPannalalVyas, Near Narayan Building Deewan Maro, House N0 12/21, Neempura, Post and TahsU Khadagpur District Midnapur (W.B.) Respondent/ Opposite Party APPEAL UNDER SECTION 28 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 KEAD WITH SECTIQN 19^F FAMILY COURTS ACT HJGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ Appellant Applicant FirstADDealNo.97of2006 Shivshankar Delikar f) Vs Resoondent OpDosite partv Smt. Anjta Delikar ^»8^. Present: Shri Mukesh Sharma, counsel for the appellant. Shri Pallav Mishra, counsel for the respondent. The appellant and the respondent are present in person. ORDER fOralt (19th July, 2011) Per I.M. Quddusi. J; This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 30.11.2005 passed by II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur dismjssing the application filed by the appellant for divorce under Section 13 ofthe Hindu Marriage Act. Today, the parties appeared before this Court in person. Re-endeavour was made by this Court for reconciliation and the parties were granted opportunity to meet and discuss about the possible settlement, which could be arrived at. After discussion, the parties appeared with a compromise deed duly signed by the parties and verified by their respective counsels. Therefore, on their joint request, a decree for divorce on mutual consent js granted with the conditjons mentioned jn the compromise deed. In the result, the appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise deed, which shall form part of the decree. The Additjonal Registrar (Judicial) is directed to draw the decree accordingly. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- G.Minhaiuddin Judge y \<.