IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review (T) No. 58 of 2008. Decided on: 28th October, 2010. Deep Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Meghna Kashava, Advocate vice Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Ms. Meghna Kashava, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 28, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?