IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO. 6455/2010 Jeetu @ Jitendra @ Mukesh @ Dantya Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 13/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat for accused petitioner Mr. Amit Poonia Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that originally the accused petitioner was granted bail on considering the merits of the case. Thereafter the accused went to Delhi for earning livelihood and therefore, he absented from the Court on several dates. In execution of the warrant, the petitioner was arrested on 28.5.2010. He has also deposited the fine imposed upon him under Section 446 Cr.P.C. The petitioner under-takes that he will attend the trial Court on all dates of hearing. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial, without prejudice to the proceedings under Section 446 Cr.P.C. Resultantly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that petitioner Jeetu @ Jitendra @ Mukesh @ Dantaliya S/O Shri Mota Ram shall be released on bail in FIR No. 313/2004 of P.S. Kotwali, Sikar on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25000/-each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (Mohammad Rafiq), J. Thanvi