/ 1/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1874 OF 2003 Ashok R. Patil ...Petitioner V/s. Gramin Vidya Vikas Vardhini Mandal & Ors. ...Respondents Shri.Susheel Mahadeshwar for Petitioner. Shri.A.A. Garge for Respondent No.1 & 2. Shri.S.D. Raylikar A.G.P. for Respondent No.3 and 4. Shri.V.P. Patankar for Respondent No.5. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & V.M. KANADE, JJ. DATED : 18th FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 2 on taking instructions from the Secretary of the Management, who is present in the court states that next vacancy in the post of Junior Clerk will occur in the school, in any case by 2009. He states that while filling in next vacancies in the post of Junior Clerk, case of the petitioner will be considered preferentially as required by the provisions of Schedule-F to the rule framed under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act. 2. In view of this statement, on motion made by the learned / 2/ counsel for the petitioner, petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in case petitioner is not appointed. ( D.K. DESHMUKH, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)