IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 10801 of 2009(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- OORALIKANDI ILLATH.U.K.RAMESHAN MOOSATH, S/O.KRISHNAN MOOSATH, POST IRIKKOOR, MAMANAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.M.VIJAYAKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, NEELESHWAR, KASARAGOD. 3. OORALIKANDI ILLATH UNNIKRISHNAN MOOSATH, POST IRIKKOOR, MAMANAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TRUSTEE, SRI.MAMANIKKUNNU MAHADEVI TEMPLE, MAMANIKKUNNU, P.O.IRIKKOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1, R2 & R5 BY MR.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SC,M.D.B, R3 BY ADV. MR.V.A.SATHEESH, R4 BY ADV. MR.M.RAMESH CHANDER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.10801/2009-U: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.4. DTD. 10/11/2008. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED DTD. 22/09/2000. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 15/11/2008. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 19/01/2008. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A1646/08(M.D.B) DTD. 24/02/2009. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. T.P.1/08 DTD. 24/06/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.10801 OF 2009 (U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5. However, it is now revealed that, against Ext.P5 he filed a revision before the Commissioner numbered as R.P.No.3/2009 and the said revision is pending. Thus it is obvious that the petitioner has already availed of the statutory remedy. Having regard to the pendency of revision as above, the writ petition itself is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider R.P.No.3/2009 with notice to the petitioner and 3rd and 4th respondents. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from th date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :