1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5460 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5461 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 7267 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 23.04.2010 1. Heard Adv. Shri N.K. Tungar for the applicant. The original suit was filed for partition. Though it was dismissed by the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court decreed the suit on 14.02.2005. It is stated in the application for condonation of delay of 1764 days that the applicant is of old age and was suffering from ill health. However, if we consider the ages of respondent Nos. 1 and 3, they are also very old. So, they are also entitled to get fruits of partition during their lifetime. Though it is stated that the applicant was suffering from ill health, no medical certificate is produced. It is stated that on one fine morning the plaintiff tried to dispossess the applicant/ori. defendant 2 from the suit land, therefore, he approached the advocate and then application for certified copy of judgment was filed. He received copies on 26.02.2010 and therefore there was delay. As against judgment which is passed on 14.02.2005, the application for condonation of delay is filed on 09.03.2010. 2. It is necessary that litigants should approach the Court within reasonable time and those who sleep over their rights are not entitled to any relief. 3. Not being satisfied with the abnormal delay of 1764 days, this application is dismissed. 4. In view of dismissal of application of condonation of delay, Civil Application No. 6461 of 2010 for stay does not survive and it is disposed of as such. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/APR10/ca5460.10