IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2008 / 24TH POUSHA 1929 W.P(C).No. 1543 of 2008 (H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- M.SURESHKUMAR, MACHINGAL HOUSE, P.O.MANNEMCODE VIA PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. PATHUKUTTY, W/O.LATE M.T.KHADER, MACHINGATHODI HOUSE, AMBALAVATTOM, PANAMANNA, OTTAPALAM. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) Nos. 1543 & 1544 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14th January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Exts. P6 and Ext. P5 orders in these cases are under challenge. By these orders, impleading petitions filed by the petitioner before the STAT have been rejected. A reading of Ext. P6 order itself shows that the STAT was following the Full Bench decision of this Court in Binu Chacho v. RTA, Pathanamthitta {2006 (2) KLT 172}. In view of the law as laid down by the Full Bench, I cannot find fault with the orders passed by the STAT. Writ petitions fail and are dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-