THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.12919 of 2010 ORDER: According to the petitioners, the first petitioner, who is the father of the second petitioner, had given sufficient dowry at the time of marriage of the second petitioner and he has also purchased a TATA Sumo vehicle bearing No.MH 26-E 680, which was registered at Regional Transport Authority, Nanded in the name of his son-in-law. Thereafter, disputes arose between the second petitioner and her husband and the second petitioner was sent to Hyderabad by her husband along with the said vehicle. Thereafter, the second petitioner filed a case against her husband under Section 498-A I.P.C and the same was registered as a case in Crime No.190/2008 by the Police South Zone, Human Protection Cell, Hyderabad on 23.09.2008. The husband of the second petitioner has already given No Objection Letter for transfer of the said vehicle and based on the said letter the vehicle was transferred in the name of the first petitioner and it was allotted a number AP 12H-9039. While so, based on a complaint given by the husband of the second petitioner, under Section 200 I.P.C before the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of E.C. at Nizamabad in Crl.M.P.No.2526 of 2009, I-Town Police Station, Nizamabad registered a case against the petitioners on 07.10.2009 i n Crime No.300/2009 under Sections 290, 403, 420, 465 and 506 I.P.C. The grievance of the petitioners is that though the third respondent-Station Hose Officer, I-Town Police Station, Nizamabad has seized their TATA Sumo, in connection with said Crime, he has not produced the same before the Magistrate concerned and using the same for his personal work. Initially, when the matter was taken up on 09.06.2010, it was adjourned for getting instructions by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Thereafter also the matter was adjourned twice. However, the respondents have not chosen to file any counter- affidavit. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has produced the written instructions sent by the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Nizamabad, which indicates that the vehicle of the petitioners, which was seized in connection with Crime No.300 of 2009, was deposited before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nizamabad vide CPR No.105/10 dated 11.06.2010 and the learned Magistrate entrusted the same to the custody of I Town Police Station, Nizamabad. A copy of the said CPR is also produced before this Court. In view of the above written instructions, it is clear that the seized vehicle of the petitioners has been produced before the learned Magistrate, who entrusted the same to the custody of police. In view of the same, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file an application before the Magistrate concerned for release of the seized vehicle. The writ petition is accordingly closed. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 21.09.2010 va