IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3628 of 2009 Date of decision: July 6, 2009. Ram Dass ...Petitioner(s) v. Kamlesh Rani ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - (Oral): This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28.5.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar, whereby the petitioner- tenant's evidence has been closed by order. Earlier also, the petitioner failed to adduce evidence despite several opportunities and consequently, his evidence was ordered to be closed by the Rent Controller. The petitioner approached this court by way of Civil Revision No.2770 of 2009, which was disposed of vide order dated 15.5.2009 with a direction that one more opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to “produce all the witnesses at his own risk” on payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-, which were to be paid before 30.5.2009. The impugned order now reveals that only one witness was produced by the petitioner on the given opportunity and the remaining two witnesses were sought to be produced through the court process. Since this Court had directed the petitioner to produce the entire evidence at his own risk, no fault can be found with the impugned order passed by the Rent Controller. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that, in the interest of justice, last opportunity may be granted to produce the remainder of the evidence. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the undertaking that the petitioner is willing to produce the remaining two witnesses also at his own risk, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner produces both the witnesses on 29th July, 2009, i.e., the date fixed, their statements may be recorded, subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent-landlord. The petitioner is directed to inform the Court in advance regarding production of two witnesses and shall also pay the costs to the landlord before 25th July, 2009. In case the petitioner fails to inform the court or pay the costs, the learned Rent Controller shall be at liberty to hear the arguments on the date fixed and dispose of the case, in accordance with law. Dasti. July 06, 2009. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge