cp334.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CONT. PETITION NO. 334 OF 2011 ,In WP/1571/2006 CHANDKHA ASRAFKHA PATHAN AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. Darak B.A. AGP for Respondent(s): Mr. P.P. More. Advocate for Respondent(s) : Mr. K.G. Salunke, Adv. h/f Mr.A.B. Kale, Adv. for R/2. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: September 08, 2011 ... Heard. 2 This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order dated 6th March, 2007 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1571/2006. 3 In pursuance to the notice, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent NO.2 Chief Executive Officer, Z.P., Jalna brings to the notice of this Court that on 3rd May, 2007 the decision cp334.11 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ on the representation of the petitioners has been communicated to the petitioners. This position is not disputed by the Counsel for the petitioners. 4 In that view of the matter, I do not think that anything further survives for consideration in this contempt petition. 5 Hence, the contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. In case the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision on representation, they can avail appropriate remedy, as available in law, if they are so advised. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*