1 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9663 OF 2009 Raghunath Bhagwan Waingankar ....Petitioner Versus Suyogita Prakash Mayekar & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. M. J. Dhuri/ Mr.H. R. Pawar for the Petitioner. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : APRIL 6 , 2010. P.C.: The Petition pertains to recording of mutation entries. It is now settled position of law that mutation entries do not create or extinguish rights of the parties and the same are recorded for fiscal purposes only. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another V/s. Daulat Singh, reported in (1997) 7 SCC 137. The parties are always at liberty to get adjudicate their rights including the title to the property by approaching the Civil Court. 2 2. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere in writ petition in my jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed by keeping all contentions of respective parties open. (R. V. MORE, J.)