THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 22590 OF 2010 Dated: 22.09.2011 Between: Smt. Karatam Satyavathi and another ..... PETITIONERS AND The Special Deputy Collector (TW) and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 22590 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioners herein claim title in respect of Ac.7.00 cents of land apart from another extent of Ac.5.68 cents situated in R.S.No.686/1 of Buttaigudem Village and Mandal. The Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare), K.R.Puram had earlier passed an order dated 4.5.2001 directing ejection of the petitioners from the above said Ac.7.00 cents of land holding that the possession of the petitioners was in contravention of the provisions of the A.P.Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners filed Writ Petition No.17252 of 2002 and the same was allowed by this Court by order dated 10.09.2004. Pursuant thereto, the petitioners requested the respondents to restore the said Ac.7.00 cents of land after cancelling the pattas granted to the third parties. Alleging that the respondents failed to consider their request, the present writ petition is filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for the respondents. The specific plea of the petitioners is that the order of ejection made by the Special Deputy Collector (Tribal Welfare) was set aside by this Court in W.P.No.17252 of 2002 and the said order became final. However it is stated that in the interregnum, the possession of the land in question was taken and the same was assigned to third parties. Therefore the petitioners claim that the possession should be restored to them after cancelling the assignments made to the third parties. Though it is stated that a representation was made by the petitioners requesting restoration, nothing could be placed before this Court to substantiate the said plea. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make an appropriate representation before the 1st respondent for restoration of the land in question consequent to the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.17252 of 2002. If any such representation is made, the 1st respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. No costs. ​ ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 22.09.2011 Ivd