|. i\io.,..S^-^2!-"J-'C^ 1 to^^^^i^^^- ^. \^Sh^» 1 w w..p^^^^m^ ^tBW^ RAIPW. r BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE ADMINTSTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARFT) O<A<NO»>^ k^ ./2000 )3W6f6^ ^ APaiCANT t GANPAT RAM KUNJAM S/0 SHRT AMAR STNGH, aged 38'years Asstt<.Teacher^ Prlmary School, Vlllage - . AAREE^ Block Development And PQSt Offlce - DONGA.RGAON, DISTT. RAJHANDGAO^ (CHHATTTSGARHJ» VERSUS. NON-APFL ICANT (l) Sfcate Govt. of Chhattlsgarh Through w Secretary^ Ifl^-- School Edi^ation Deptto Raipur (Chhattlsgarh). (2) Dlstt. Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (Chhattlsgarh) , (3).Block Development Offlcer, Dongargaon Di. stt • Ra jnandgaon e (4) The Rrincipal, Boys Hlgher Secondary Sahool^ (Sankol) Dongargaon ^ D,i stt «. Ra jnandgaon < APPLI-GATION UNDER STCTION 19 OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT 1985. <S) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(SI No. 3486 of 2005 Petitioner : Gaiipat Ram Kiuyam Vcrsus Respondents Ste.tc Govt. ofChhattisgarh & others 8B: Honl3lc Mr. Justicc Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present; Shri Ajay Sfarivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for fhe rcspondents. ORDER (Passed on tliis 28& day ofPebniaiy, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appomted as Assistant Teacher on jEixed pay of Rs. 150/- vide order dated 28.1.1983. After completion oftwo year's probation, he was granted regular pay scale. 2, Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioaer submits that the issue uwolved iii the case is asto whefher the petitioaer is entifled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of mitial appointment or from the date ofcompletion pfprobalioH period. 3. The issne mvolved, herem was considercd by fhe Madhya Pradesh State Admmistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. & ofhers), whercin it was held that the similarly situated teachers are eutitied to regular pay scale w.e.f fhe date ofinitial appomtment The matterwas taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court m Special Leave Petition (Civij^ No, 6892/93. The said pelfflion was disimssed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Trftiunal to the effect titiat the Teachers/Assistasit Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale feom date of mitial appointment r- Thakur 4. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioaer fiirther subndts fhat tiiis Gourt, while considering fhe same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of Chliatdsgarh & another (W.P. (S) No. 813 of 2007) by orderdated 12-2-2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of initial appomtaient. 5. Learaed counsel ap^ariug for fhe parties jomfly submit that fhis case is squarcly covered by the decision of fhis Coiut ui the case of Rani Kumar Sahu aad anofher (Supra). 6. In view offhat, fhis petition is attowed m the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge