IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8924 of 2010 1. PERMILA KUMARI 2. Asharfi Devi Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 5/ 10.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that it is a case of love affair of the victim girl with co-accused Binod Kumar Yadav. F.I.R. is also to the effect that she was kidnapped to marry with Binod Kumar Yadav which is corroborated in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. after recovery for which submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that that was noted down only after her coming to informant’s family as told by them to corroborate the prosecution case. A letter written by the victim lady is filed making a request to help her to have association of the co-accused Binod Kumar Yadav. Petitioners are sister and mother of co-accused Binod Kumar Yadav having no concern with kidnapping or disappearing of the victim. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 04 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Siwan subject to the 2 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)