1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2006 Mrs. Sreelatha Raghavendra Shenoy. ..Petitioner. V/s. Mr.Raghavendra M. Shenoy. ..Respondent. Mr.Harshad N. Mirashi for petitioner. Mr.Das for Jeevan Puranik for respondent. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : MAY 3, 2006. DATE : MAY 3, 2006. DATE : MAY 3, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Perused the affidavit of Mr.Raghvendra Manohar Shenoy dated 3rd May, 2006. It is seen that the contemnor has deposited the entire amount towards arrears of maintenance on 29th April, 2006 in the Trial Court. The fact remains that one time deposit has been made towards the arrears of maintenance for the period between 30th June, 2004 to 30th April, 2006. No reason is forthcoming as to what prevented the respondent to deposit monthly maintenance amount regularly. The explanation offered in paragraph-6 about inability to deposit Rs.5,000/-per month on regular basis cannot be accepted. 2. Be that as it may, as the entire maintenance 2 amount has already been deposited and the respondent assures before this court that in future he will not commit any default and gives undertaking that he will regularly deposit monthly maintenance on or before 15th of every English Calender month. On accepting this undertaking no precipitative action is required. 3. Petition is disposed of with clear understanding that the respondent shall not commit even a single default for the payment of maintenance amount within specified time as aforesaid.