1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.5541 of 2005 Shri Thakur Bhulchand Bhairwani Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. Respondents None for the applicant. Ms.R.M.Gadhvi, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. January 19, 2007. P.C. . By this application the applicant prays for cancellation of the bail granted to Shri Parveen Talreja (Respondent no.2) on 14/1/2005 in C.R.No.97 of 2004 registered with the Economic Offences Wing, Unit - III, G.B. C.B., C.I.D. It appears that the applicant had also filed Criminal Application No.3990 of 2005 praying for the same relief but against both the accused i.e. Shri Mahendra Dhariwal and Shri Parveen Talreja but Criminal Application No.3990 of 2005 was dismissed against the respondent no.3 i.e. Parveen Talreja as per the order of this Court dated 29/7/2005 and, therefore, Criminal Application No.5541 of 2005 came to be filed afresh on or about 19th August 2005. While passing the order dated 29/7/2005 in Criminal Application No.3990 of 2005 the statement of the applicant was recorded that the said 2 application would be pressed only against the respondent no.2 i.e. Shri Dhariwal and against the respondent no.3 a fresh application would be filed. . Criminal Application No.3990 of 2005 surviving against Shri Dhariwal came to be rejected by this Court on 10/10/2005. It was noted that the application was filed after the investigation was completed and, therefore, the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail could not be considered. The applicant had the remedy to approach the appropriate forum in case it was his grievance that the investigation was not carried out properly. . When this application is called out today for hearing, none is present and it has been filed by the very same Advocate who appeared in Criminal Application No.3990 of 2005. For the reasons stated in the order dated 10/10/2005 rejecting Criminal Application No.3990 of 2005, this application also stands rejected. (B.H