HIGH COURT OFCHHA'rTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Writ Petition fCr.-S No. 4136 of2008 Nutan Patel, D/o Shri Samaru Patel, aged about 25 years, R/o Dharam Nagar, Saheed Pankaj Vikram Ward No. 2, Beside Haribhumi Press, Raipur, District Raipur(CG). - VEOSUS 1. Lakhanlal Jeteesi, S/o Bodhiram, Aged about 32 years, Caste Satnami, R/o Chhattisgarh Nagar, Behmd Gas Godown, Tila'apara; Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through PoUce Station Tikrapara, District Raipur, CG. (WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'UeMr, SatishK.AsnhotAJ.) Present : Shri Satyeadra Sahu, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate,for tfae respondent No. 1. Shri A8. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe State. ' ORALORDER 3K (Passed on 30"' day ofJanuary,2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioner submits that the order dated 23.06.08 (Annexure P/l), passed by the Additional Chief ^w. Judicial Magistrate, Raipur; is bad in law, as fhe leamed Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur, has directed to register F.I.R. before mvestigation. 2. Be that as it may, it is a judicial order and the petitioner could have very-well approached to the superior court under the provisions of law. The petitioner has approached fhis court under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia. Sahn 3. It is well settled that when the eflecttve statutory remedy is available, this court should not entertain such a petition whioh can be adjudicated and decided by the superior court. 4 Thus, this petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 5. Interim reliefgranted eariier stands vacated. 6. Consequently, I.A. No. 2, application for vacating stay order and I.A. No. 3, application for early bearing, stand disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agna»»m Judge ^w.