1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1902 OF 1999 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 5495 OF 1998 State Bank of Hyderabad .. .. Applicant Versus Ramkishan S/o Tukaram Lahoti .. .. Respondent Shri S. N. Boiwar, Advocate h/f Shri S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant. The Respondent No. 1A & 1C served – absent. CORAM : N. D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard Shri Boiwar, learned counsel holding for Shri S. R. Deshpande, learned counsel for the applicant (absent). This is a old second appeal of 1998 filed along with the application for condonation of delay of 73 days. 2. Perused the application. The appellant is a bank i. e. State Bank of Hyderabad, Branch Hadgaon. The reason stated is that concerned branch manager took more time than expected for getting necessary sanction from the head office for proceeding further after the impugned judgment came to be passed. So the 2 delay is explained in the application and in such matters when the appeal preferred is by institution or corporation or bank or organization it requires approval or sanction from the head office. As such, the application for condonation of delay deserves to be allowed. The applicant has made out case for condonation of delay. The application is allowed. The delay of 73 days is condoned. The civil application is accordingly disposed of. 3. Since the application is allowed, the second appeal be registered and numbered and it be listed for admission in the next wee, as it is a very old appeal of the year 1998. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Dec.09