1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1570 of 2003 Eva Joseph D’Cunha .. Petitioner versus Smt.Usha Sudhakar Tipnis (Decd) by LRs .. Respondents ... Mr.Rajesh S. Datar for the petitioner. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 12th September 2008 P.C.: 1. Office remark indicates that notice sent by the petitioner by speed post has been returned with endorsement "intimation". That does not mean that unserved respondent has been duly served nor it is possible to assume that unserved respondent has refused to accept service. In the circumstances, petitioner to take steps to serve the unserved respondents afresh by advocate’s notice, either personally or by courier/speed post/e-mail/fax, and 2 file an affidavit of service within four weeks from today and file affidavit of service of the concerned petition failing which writ petition to stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the court. 2. If steps are taken in time, petition may proceed for hearing as per its turn. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)