IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.983 of 2010 Date of decision : 16.8.2010 Punjab National Bank … Appellant Versus The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-I, Chandigarh and others. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act is directed against interim order dated 2.7.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge, while admitting the writ petition. Learned Single Judge has issued interim direction that the appellant will be at liberty to grant the benefit to the respondents from the date it is due, i.e. the date they had qualified in the matriculation examination. However, the prayer for staying the award of the Industrial Tribunal has been declined. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant at some length and find that the matter requires to be adjudicated before the learned Single Judge on merit and we are not inclined to interfere with the interim direction issued by the learned Single Judge. Dismissed. However, we direct that the writ petition be heard at the earliest and it be listed for hearing on 6.9.2010. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 16.08.2010 sd