IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR’S REPORT NO.59 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.249 OF 1986 In the matter of M/s.Diram Chemicals Private Limited (In Liquidation) M/s.Progressive Chemicals, Bombay ....Petitioner Mr.P.S. Pratap for Mr.D.K.Desai and Mrs.M.K. Desai. Mr.P. Ramarao, Official Liquidator present. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. : 1. There is nothing on record which warrants impleading the son of the director against whom misfeasance proceedings were initiated. The director expired in March, 2001. His son was not a director of the company. The report does not indicate any connection between the son and the company or even between the son and any of the assets of the company. In the circumstances, the directions sought in paragraphs 6(a) of the report are refused. 2. The wife of the director was also a director of the company. Hence the report is made absolute in terms of paragraph 6(b). Mr.Pratap states that the director’s wife is not aware of the working of the company as she was not incharge of the affairs of the company. Be that as it may, an affidavit is required to be filed by her. Affidavit shall be filed within eight weeks from today.