IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2009 / 28TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 2945 of 2004(A) ------------------------------------ AS.226/1998 of II ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM ...................................................................................................... PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. K.VASU DEVAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE FROM MARUTHAMAN, MADATHIL VEEDU, KALLARA, ANAKUDI MURI, VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. G.ASHOK KUMAR, S/O.SREEDHARAN, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE FROM MARUTHAMAN, MADATHIL VEEDU KALLARA, ANAKUDI MURI, VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARY TO LAW GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. PREMRAJ PRABHATH KUMAR, S/O.PREMRAJ, PREM NILAYAM, OORALIKONAM, ANAD MURI, PALODE VILLAGE. 3. ACHUTHAN PILLAI VIJAYAN, VIJAYA BHAVAN, PALODE. 4. JANARDHANAN PILLAI SASINDRAN NAIR, CHANDRIKA VILASOM, PERAYAM, PALODE. 5. SUKUMARAN, S/O.SANKARN, STAMP VENDOR, DAILY BUSINESS, IN OLD N.P. VIII/555, PALODE, (DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DATD 16.3.1999). 6. G.HEMA, D/O.GOMATHY, FROM, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT DUBAI. 7. SYAMALA KUMARI, D/O.GOMATHY, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE. 8. G.PRASANNA KUMARI, D/O.GOMATHI, LAKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE. 9. G.NIRMALA KUMARI, D/O.GOMATHY, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGD VILLAGE. 10. G.SHEELA MONI, D/O.GOMATHY, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE. 11. G.SINDHU, D/O.GOMATHY, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PAZHAVADI, THEKKUMKARA MURI, NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.D.SAJEEV FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, a regular second appeal has been filed in respect of the same subject matter and therefore the counsel sought permission to withdraw this Writ Petition, without prejudice to the right to pursue the regular second appeal. Permission is accordingly granted. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- 19/08/2009 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE SS C.T. RAVIKUMAR,J ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 2945 OF 2004 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, a regular second appeal has been filed in respect of the same subject matter and therefore the counsel sought permission to withdraw this Writ Petition without prejudice to the right to pursue the regular second appeal. Permission is accordingly granted. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE SS