WP(C) 3090/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Md. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr SK Das, learn ed Standing Counsel, Education Department, Govt. of Assam for the official respo ndents. For the order proposed to be passed, it is considered inessential to iss ue formal notice. Briefly stated, the petitioner’s pleaded case is that she is serving as an Assistant Teacher in Kuti Kaloni LP School and is presently seniormost in tha t rank. The erstwhile Headmistress/ Head Teacher of the institution, Dalimi Begu m having resigned, the Managing Committee purportedly recommended her son Julfik ar Rahman for appointment as the Head Teacher of the school. According to the pe titioner, the Block Elementary Education Officer, Agomoni has meanwhile illegall y approved such recommendation. The grievance of the petitioner is that this sch ool having been approved for financial assistance for the year 2010-2011, Mr Jul fikar Rahman in the capacity of Head Teacher is trying to withdraw the sanctione d amount though his induction to the post of Head Teacher is illegal and in viol ation of the express norms and the Rules applicable. Being apprehensive that if the amount of financial assistance is laid at the disposal of Mr Julfikar Rahman there is every possibility that the same would be mis-utilised, the petitioner meanwhile has submitted a representation on 10.3.2011 before the Deputy Inspecto r of Schools, Dhubri for his remedial intervention but to no avail. She has, the refore, turned to this Court for redress. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the pleaded facts and the documents laid before this Court, it is of the view that for the present, having regard to the nature of the controversy involved, the instant petition is closed with a direction to the Deputy Inspector of Schoo ls, Dhubri to decide on the petitioner’s representation at the earliest. This au thority, if deemed fit, would make necessary enquiries into the facts narrated i n the representation as well as those incidental thereto and accord opportunity of hearing to the parties involved. The decision taken would, thereafter, be com municated to the petitioner in writing. The exercise as aforementioned would be completed within two weeks herefrom. As it has been submitted before this Court that the amount of financial assistance has not yet been disbursed, the aforementioned departmental authority would ensure that till disposal of the representation as aforesaid the same is not remitted. No costs.