IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.1168 of 2004 Date of Decision 01.10.2010 Nirmal Singh ...... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Chaudhary, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: The petitioner-complainant has preferred this petition against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.12.2003, passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Patiala. Occurrence in this case took place on 23.09.2002, the FIR was lodged on 26.09.2002 and the prosecutrix was got medically examined on 28.09.2002. There is no plausible explanation as to why the FIR was got lodged after three days and prosecutrix was medically examined after five days of the occurrence. The doctor, who had medically examined the prosecutrix has categorically stated that there is no evidence of forcible sexual intercourse with her. Even otherwise, the evidence appears to have been appreciated in the right perspective. Statement of the prosecutrix is shaky and the same cannot be placed reliance. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 01.10.2010 mamta-II