IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7422 of 1995 BINOD KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 18.8.2008 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. S. K. Sinha, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 is present. The present writ application has been filed by petitioner as fourth attempt seeking regularization of his services under the respondents since he had worked on ad hoc basis from the year, 1988. At no point of time in any of the writ applications earlier any categorical direction was given upon the respondents. But the categorical stand of the respondents was that there was no sanctioned post on which the petitioner could be regularized. They do not deny that he was engaged for a while but thereafter due to difficult financial situation which the then Notified Area Committee was facing the petitioner had been disengaged soon thereafter. Even otherwise there is no Notified Area Committee existing in the State of Bihar due to altered situation and legislation brought about pursuant to 73rd Constitutional Amendment. No relief therefore can be granted to petitioner in the given facts, the changed situation and the present law on the matters of regularization laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Uma Devi. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)