THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.21087 of 2010 Dated 13th September, 2011 Between: M.Rajaram Reddy …Petitioner And The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Transport, Roads & Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri S.Arifullah Counsel for the respondents: GP for Transport The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly, a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the application of the petitioner, dt.6-6-2008 (i) seeking for the grant to permission following the Rule 258(2)(ii) of APMV Rules 1989 by declaring the Route Proddatur Mydukur Road Anwar Talkies to Kuchuppa(V) as Town Service Route by the 2nd respondent is illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondent to consider and dispose of the two applications of the petitioner dt.6-6-2008 (i) seeking to formulate the Town Service route Proddatur Mydukur Road Answar Talkies to Kuchuppa(V) following U/sec.68 (3) (ca) of the M.V Act by the 1st respondent and (2) to grant permission following the rule 258(2) (ii) of APMV Rules,1989 by declaring the Route Proddatur Mydukur Road Anwar Talkies to Kuchupapa(V) as Town Service Route by the 2nd respondent respectively within a period of two months, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.” Sri S.Arifullah, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.26824 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Dated 13th September, 2011 lur