FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1656 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL St. NO.159 OF 2010. ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ We heard learned Counsel Mr. Kandharkar for the applicant. 2 Notice. The learned A.P.P. takes notice for respondents. 3 The appeal filed by applicant – accused against his conviction and sentence for the offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C., is delayed by about 296 days. The learned Counsel for the applicant points out the ground for condonation of delay as mentioned in paragraphs 2 and 3. 4 The learned A.P.P. Mr. Shaikh did not file reply to the application. However, he vehemently opposed the application. Undisputedly, the present applicant is undergoing sentence awarded by the learned Sessions Judge for offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C. In our view, case for condonation of delay is made out. 5 Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (S.B. DESHMUKH,J) 30.04.2010. kadam/*