IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-26897 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 27, 2011 Maya and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Paramjeet Singh Sullar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate, for the complainant. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 308, dated 13.08.2010, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 read with Section 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Ambala City. For the reasons recorded in the order of even date passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. No. M-25579 of 2010 – CRM M-26897 of 2010 Suman Sharma vs. State of Haryana, the present petition is allowed. Order dated 15.09.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner-accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. However, it is made clear if agreement to sell is placed before the Court and same is found to be forged and fabricated one or Court finds that photocopy placed before the Court is of forged and fabricated document, Court shall be at liberty on the application of the complainant under Section 340 Cr.P.C. to hold enquiry and to direct the prosecution of the accused- petitioner herein. January 27, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2