IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH MAY 2008 / 9TH JYAISHTA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 13972 of 2008(L) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- T.NARAYANAN, THALAKKAT HOUSE, P.O.EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 13972 OF 2008 - L = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 30th May, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Ext. P1, variation was granted subject to settlement of timing by proceedings issued as early as on 29.5.2006. According to the petitioner since the timing conference has not been held and on account of the delay, permit granted is not issued. It is also his case that priority is being overlooked and he is referring to Ext. P3 in this regard. It is on this basis the petitioner makes the prayer that the timing conference should be convened and timing should be settled in the order of priority. I see no reason to decline the prayer sought for by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of directing that following the priority the timing of the petitioner in respect of the grant of permit as per Ext. P1 should be settled. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-