IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18523 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 30.09.2011 Sarpinder Jyot Singh .... PETITIONER Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. B.S. Sra, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Petitioner Sarpinder Jyot Singh has filed the instant petition for issuing direction to respondent No.3 to decide his application (Annexure P9), wherein it has been prayed that the property, the possession of which was taken from him in the attachment proceedings initiated under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, be returned back to him, because vide order dated 10.11.2005 (Annexure P-7), those attachment proceedings have been dropped. It is the case of the petitioner that after the attachment proceedings is dropped, the property is required to be returned back to the person, from whom its possession was taken by the authorities, but in this CWP No. 18523 of 2011 -2- case, till date, the said property has not been delivered back to the petitioner by the Receiver. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that in this regard, the petitioner has made a detailed representation (Annexure P-9) to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (East), U.T., Chandigarh (respondent No.3), under whose orders, the property of the petitioner was attached and Receiver was appointed, but till date, respondent No.3 has not considered and decided his representation in accordance with law. Learned counsel states that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied if this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation expeditiously in accordance with law. In view of the above, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice of motion, as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the Sub Divisional Magistrate (East), U.T. Chandigarh (respondent No.3) to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE September 30, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE