1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTON WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2122 OF 2010 Lumbharam Raghunath Choudhary & Anr. .. Petitioners V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.L.Palan for the petitioners. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Govt.Pleader for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.P.Thorat for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ. DATE: 12TH OCTOBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Mr.Thorat, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 has tendered in Court communication/ instructions received by him from the Executive Engineer, C-3 Divn. M.B.R.& R.Board, 10-12 Ropa Lane, Chandanwadi, Mumbai, dated 12th October, 2010. We may quote last paragraph of the said communication; “Due to dilapidated condition, the building was demolished and tenants from aforesaid building are residing in MHADA’s transit camp. Hence for rehabilitation & reaccommodation of the tenants from transit camp, it is at utmost necessity to either redevelop or reconstruct the building. If landlord desires to redevelop the building he should submit the proposal for redevelopment as per procedure including more than 70% consent from tenants and provided he should follow the terms and conditions mentioned in NOC. Otherwise he should cooperate with MHADA to reconstruct the same”. 2 2. In view of this communication, Mr.Thorat states that the petitioner/ landlord, who desires to redevelop the building, should submit a proposal for redevelopment as per the procedure with the consent of more than 70% of the tenants. If such a proposal is submitted, the same would be considered expeditiously and in accordance with law. 3. This statement is accepted. The aforesaid communication is taken on record and marked “x” . 4. In view of this statement, learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press this petition. Petition is disposed of as not pressed. ( RANJIT MORE, J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.)