§mg5§$ §mmh F$Iagzf IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CH AT BILASP UR k mag PETITIONER W.P. (S) N0. 3 22 X / Ghanshyam Sahu, S/o. Mangtu Ram Sahu, Aged about 4O years? R/o. Karma Cottage, Santoshi Mandir, Gariyaband, District Raipur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS I] Slate 0!‘ Chhattisgarh ThrOugh: / Secretary, Tri baJ Wélfare Depamnem, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) HATTISGARH 2]/CoHect0r, Tribal Welfare Raipur / District Raipur (CG) 3] Commissioner: Tribal Welfare Raipur District Raipur (CG) ( 4] Asstt. Commissioner, Welfare Raipur District (CG) / 5] Rekha Sliul<la7 Upper Division Teacher, Higher Secondary School, Dhawalpur, Gariyaband, District Raip‘ur (CG) Tri bal Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 ()F THE CONSTITUTIO N N OF INDIA ,, D\\ ) _ :3 f -_ H£GH COURT OFuCHHATTisGH "m ._AT BRLASPUR ._ . S5X (Hon Mr. Justice Pritinker 5§waken Wri% PekE‘eEan {S} No. 3328 of 20%9 Ghanshyam Sahu. State o hhattisgah and others. Shri Mano} Paranjape counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for e respondents/State. \VWRET PETWION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF !NDIA ORDER (13.07.2009) finaliy. With the consent of the-counsel for the parties, the matter is heard Chaiienge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by th Coiiec‘tor, Tribai Weifare Raipur — (Respohdent No.2) b hich petitioner has be transferred Batak Middle School, Gariyaband to Girts’ Middie School, Sadhauli (Garlyaband). Counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length submits that e wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the authorities concerned. He also seeks a direction f0? early disposai of the represenatto to which counset for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with tiberty as aforesaid. lt is directed that it the petitioner makes a representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt strictly in accordance with law. ‘ it is made ciear that nothing has been commented on merits of the case and the authorities are free to decide the representatWiy in accordance with iaw. Pritinker Diwaker l \ e Sd/_ Judge . PETiTmNER VER$US REspomgENR f Cr th e y w en h tn