IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20154 of 1997 Between: Divisional Manager, APSRTC., Kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep. by its Presiding Officer, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 Regional Transport Authority, Rep. by its Secretary, Kakinada, EAst Godavari Distrit. 3 Smt. S. Manga Sridevi, C/o. P. Rajagopala Chary, Ramnagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of a Writ Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt. 24-4-1997 made in A.P.No. 56/95 on the file of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad setting aside the order dt. 28-12-1994 in item No. 3 in R.No. 9315/A2/93 of the Regional Transport Authority, East Godavari, Kakinada, rejecting the application of 3rd Respondent for grant of permit, and quash the same as being illegal and without jurisdiction, and in valid, Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KSRINIVAS RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J June 24, 2009. KTL/ASP