WP/7378/10 1 SSK/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7378 OF 2010 Parvatibai Sahadeo Nachare & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus The Collector, Raigad District, Raigad & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Machhindra A. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. N. Patil, AGP. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: It is the main grievance of the petitioners, that respondents have not complied with the directions issued by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal(MRT for short) in RA 18/B/2002 to produce record. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. He has drawn our attention to several notices which are annexed to the petition. The notices do indicate that respondent nos.2 & 3 have been directed to produce record. If there is any direction from the MRT to produce record, the authorities will have to comply with the same. No direction is necessary for that purpose. We hope and trust that the respondents will comply with the directions issued by the MRT and produce the records in the Court on next date of hearing. The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. (R. V. MORE, J.) (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)