©r ,in8l3B INTHB HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHAmSGARH W.P.NO. S (33 /2005 ^ l.l^ .<'/ PETITIONER SATISH KUMAR TAMRAKAR S/0 SHRI JANARDAN PRASAD TAMRAKAR, R/0 13-A MAHALWAR NIWAS VASUNDHARA COLONY, OPPOSITE DURGA PRO- VISION, CHANGORABHATA, RAIPURC.G. 492013 VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^'ff/. ^//^ -^ /o' '/tx // ^)7^^ ^/^ A^' ^ 1. S'CATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT MINISTRY, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RA.IPUR C.G. ^2. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISTRICT DURG C.G. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, CHHATTISGARH, RAIPUR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/f2:7 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIAFOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THB NATURE OF CERTIORRI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION ANDOTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTIQN OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER^)R O^DERS. T 'o' *II*ICT! gifliqa 'T5T r<4l^llCT<i, ®TiT'M<lc,fsidi'yy ^.^.^.......2<?3../..or sn^ff'q^? (^f^S?) sD^iw firfiii w an^?i sti^l'ti ^arar ^ft? aii^i <*i-'<frt4N <4Wcii if^6 <r»i(<;i< ^? 3tRpT 3?I^T Justice PritinHer Diwaker Shri A.K. Yadav counsel Shri Arvind Dubey PL foij for the petitioner. the respondents/Stete. The petitioner has chaiiejnged in this petition the inaction on the part of the respondentajState in not complying the order of the Tribunai passed in QA No. 624/1997 and TA No. 496/1998. Contention of the couns^l not argue on the merits of thej he may be permitted to mak^ Government which the State decide in accordance with law.1 Counsel for the respond^nts/State of the tribunal was very mu^ petitioner who chose not to ^| point, counsel for the petition^r not receive the call letter. for the petitioner is that he witl lcase. He howeversubmits that a representation to the State (povernment may be directed to submits that the order ;h complied with but it is the ppear in the interview. On this submits that the petitioner did B-m^ ^i-Pu. :C—78 ^i<ifaDta!> T 'S'Sf •<ii<<in'4, Bxil'M'is, f^TRTy sn^ vi h-< TOT3]ltgWTO? y °Ti *(I*)CTI aw)^» 3?I^!T't5Rr ( yifj»l<^) TOTOT ^ftil sntw Be that as it may, representation, the same shall law. With these observations, ^nfepftT ii^d)' ^ fscS ^[aiui< ^sifwantn if the petitioner makes a be decided in accordance with the petition is disposed of. Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge IM