IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 763 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 28th January, 2011. Rajwant Kaur Petitioner through Mr. B.S.Bajwa, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner was appointed as an Education Volunteer by the District Education Officer [EE], Gurdaspur vide order dated 31.12.2008 [Annexure P-2]. As per the averments made in Para No. 5 of the writ petition, she was born on 10.11.1967. The petitioner, as it appears, was more than 35 years old at the time she was appointed vide order dated 31.12.2008 [Annexure P-2]. Like several other Education Volunteers whose cases were disposed of by this Court vide order dated 18.01.2011 passed in CWP No. 2312 of 2010 [Paramjit Kaur & Anr. V State of Punjab & Ors., the petitioner also apprehends termination of her services on the premise that she was over-age at the time of employment. In my considered view, no separate directions need to be issued in the petitioner's case as the policy decision required to be taken by the respondents in terms of the directions issued in Paramjit Kaur's case [supra], would apply to the petitioner also. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the order dated 18.01.2011 passed by this Court in Paramjit Kaur's case [supra]. As regard to the alleged non-payment of salary, the petitioner may approach the District Education Officer [EE], Gurdaspur who shall look into her claim and pass appropriate orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. January 28, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE