IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1751 of 2006 1. RAM CHANDRA YADAV, son of Late Asarfi Yadav, and 2. Ram Nandan Yadav @ Ramanand Yadav, son of Late Asarfi Yadav, both resident of Mouza – Fateha, Pargana – Naypur, P.S. and Circle and P.O. – Bachwara, Sub – Registry and Sub – Division – Teghara, Distt. – Begusarai….1st Party Defendants …………..Petitioners Versus 1. BALESHWAR YADAV, son of Late Mithu Yadav, 2. Sunil Yadav, 3. Shambhu Yadav, 4. Ramesh Yadav, O.P. Nos. 2 to 4 are sons of Baleshwar Yadav and all residents of Mauza – Fatheha, Pargana – Naypur, P.S. and Circle and P.O. – Bachawara, Sub Registry and Sub – Division – Teghara, Distt. – Begusarai………..Plaintiffs, 5. Ram Udagar Yadav, son of Late Mithu Yadav, 6. Ram Sewak Yadav, 7. Pramod Yadav, 8. Ram Naresh Yadav, 9. Suresh Yadav, O.P. Nos. 6 to 9 are sons of Ram Udagar Yadav, 10. Kusheshwar Yadav, son of Late Mithu Yadav, 11. Pawan Kumar Yadav, son of Kuesheshwar Yadav, 12. Dinesh Yadav, son of Kuesheshwar Yadav, 13. Manoj Kumar Yadav, son of Ram Chandra Yadav, 14. Santosh Kumar Yadav, son of Ram Chandra Yadav, 15. Kamaldeo Yadav, son of Late Asarfi Yadav, all residents of Mauza – Fatheha, Pargana – Naypur, P.S. and Circle and P.O. – Bachawara, Sub – Registry and Sub – Division – Teghara, Distt. – Begusarai…………………………..….1st Party Defendants, 16. Visheshwar Yadav, son of Hijju Yadav, 17. Jugeshwar Yadav, son of Hijju Yadav, 18. Asheshwar Yadav, son of Prahlad Yadav, 19. Jagadish Yadav, son of Late Din Dayal Yadav, 20. Sudhir Yadav, son of Late Din Dayal Yadav, 21. Ghannu Yadav, son of Devak Yadav, 22. Laltun Yadav, 23. Makhalu Yadav, 24. Pramod Yadav, 25. Uma Kant Yadav, O.P. Nos. 22 to 25 are sons of Late Ghuran Yadav, 2 26. Gorelal Yadav, son of Ram Nath Yadav, all residents of Mauza – Fatheha, Pargana – Naypur, P.S., Circle and P.O. – Bachawara, Sub – Registry, Sub – Division – Teghara, Distt. – Begusarai and 27. Ram Chandra Yadav, son of Late Siya Ram Yadav, resident of Mauja – Chiranjipur, Pargana – Naypur, P.S., Circle and P.O. – Bachawara, Sub – Registry and Sub – Division – Teghra, Distt. Begusarai…………..Second Parties Defendants….Opp.parties. ----------- 2. 26.02.2009. Heard Mr. Pravin Chandra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners. The defendants first party – petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 11.09.2006, passed by the Munsif-II, Begusarai in Title Suit No. 103 of 1988, whereby the petition filed by the defendants first party for amending the written statement was rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case was posted for hearing of final submissions on behalf of the parties and when the plaintiffs’ argument started, the defendants vehemently searched and traced out certain documents which, according to the defendants, were necessary to be brought on record and, thus, a prayer for allowing certain amendment in the written statement had been made. The trial court after due consideration of the rival submissions of the parties has come to the conclusion 3 that title suit is of the year 1988 and is at its final stage. Further, final submissions on behalf of the plaintiffs have already been heard and the defendants were required to place their submissions on point of final hearing of the suit. No valid reason could be accorded by the defendants for making such prayer of amending the written statement at this belated stage. Thus, the court below has refused the aforesaid prayer of the petitioners in the interest of justice. In view of the above I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order dated 11.09.2006. As a result, this Civil Revision is dismissed. dk (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)