IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23378 of 2008 Between: P.Chaitanya Sravanthi D/o.Sri P.B.Reddy R/o.H.No.9-74/1,Dilsukhnagar,Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner,Tank Bund,Hyderabad 2 The Assistant City Planner, Town Planning,L.B.Nagar Circle, GHMC.Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in contemplating to demolish the building over the plot No,19/A,in Sy.No.126,130,131,situated at SBH Colony,Kothapet, Hyderabad as illegal, high handed arbitrary,and contrary to the provisions of Section 452 and 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY(SC FOR GHMC,SNCZONE) The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23378 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been ﬁled by P. Chaitanya Sravanthi assailing the action of the respondents in contemplating to demolish the building existing over plot NO. 19/A in Survey Nos. 126, 130, 131, situated at S.B.H. Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad as illegal. 2. The petitioner claimed to be absolute owner of the plot No. 19/A, comprising Survey Nos. 126,130,131, admeasuring 325 square yards situated at S.B.H. Colony, Hyderabad having purchased the same under sale deed dated 6-2-1999. She applied for building permission. The respondent Corporation granted permission vide its proceeding NO. G3/BA/290/2007 dated 25-2-2008. While so, the respondent Corporation is contemplating to demolish the constructions made by the petitioner without following due process of law. According to the petitioner, the respondent Corporation has not served any notice. 3. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy, learned standing counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation received notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents. 5. Learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submits that the respondents will follow due process of law in the event of the constructions made by the petitioner are required to be demolished. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to follow the due process of law in the event of the constructions made by the petitioner are required to be demolished. No order as costs. ________________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Redddy 24th October, 2008 KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23378 OF 2008 24th October, 2008.