IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29094 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANANDA KRISHNAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR, "MUNDAPALLY VEEDU", PONNEZHA, THEKKEKARA P.O., MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA,REP.BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY VIJAYAMMA PILLAI, AGED 69 YEARS, W/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR, "NUNDAPALLY VEEDU", PONNEZHA, THEKKEKARA P.O.,-DO- BY ADV. SRI.B.HARISH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA-688001. 2. TALUK LAND BOARD CHAIRMAN/REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF TALUK LAND BOARD/ REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CHENGANOOR P.O., ALAPPUZHA-689121. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, MAVELIKARA TALUK, MAVELIKARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-690101. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, THEKKEKARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-690107. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011, ALONG WITH WP(C) NO. 29158 OF 2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 29094/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 17-6-2002 OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 21-6-06 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 8-11-2010 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN T(CR)108/CHR DATED 27-1-2000 PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 9-10-11 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P6: A TRUE COPY OF THE CORRECTION PETITION DATED 23-10-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE dnc ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) Nos. 29094 & 29158 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T In these writ petitions both the petitioners seek correction of an error in the order passed by the 2nd respondent. Invoking S.85 (9A) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. They have filed Ext.P6 in WPC 29094/11 and Ext.P7 in WPC 29158/11. Orders have not been passed on these applications. Therefore these writ petitions are filed. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioners. Without expressing anything on the merits of the contentions raised, these writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions. The 2nd respondent shall consider the aforesaid applications with notice to the parties concerned as expeditiously as possible at any rate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition, for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge