1 itxal1845-10 agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1845 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 4, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Kotak Securities Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant. Mr.F.V. Irani i/by Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. DATE : 28th March, 2011. P.C. : 1. The question of law raised in this appeal is whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in quashing the re-assessment proceedings initiated for the assessment year 2001-02 beyond a period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year. 2. Perusal of the reasons recorded by the assessing officer, as also the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal show that in the present case assessment beyond a period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year is sought to be reopened on the basis of the 2 itxal1845-10 materials which were on record at the time of passing the assessment order. The fact that the assessee claimed 100% depreciation instead of 25% depreciation cannot be a ground to hold that there was failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. In the present case, the Tribunal by following the decision of this Court in the case of ICICI Bank V/s. K.J. Rao reported in 268 ITR 203 has allowed the claim of the assessee. 3. We see no infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)