4 C^ ( 0-^_ IN THE HON'BLE HIGILCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ ..^ PETITIONER ^rpP^-fc^^f^ ^fi.e^w^e^r}' r?_ ,^ W.P.(227) N0. ^ Q,(-f /2008 ^ Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, (Transport Section), Divisional Office- Bilaspur (C.G.) <L- RESPONDENTS f^^dJ^ ..'^ ±^/ ^' t.^ ..¥' ^' Versus ^ 1. o-^ 2. ^' •^ ^ Ramswaroop Gupta, Son ofKallu Prasad Gupta, Ex-Conductor Korba Depot, r/o village and P.0.- Pahra, Via- Harpalpur, Distt.- Chhattarpur (M.P.), Present Address- Housing Board Colony, L.I.G. 91 Devri-khurd, Bilaspur (C.G.) .. - - - Industrial Court of Chhattisgarh Bench at Bilaspur (C.G.), through its Joint Registrar. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE227 0£THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA ::-S®i, J HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPUR Singte Bench ; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritinker &iwqker Writ Petftion f22n No. 6784 of 2008 1 PstltlONER RESPON&ENTS Divisional Manager, Chhottisgarh Infrostructure t>ev®Jopment Corporation. Versus Ramswaroop ©upta ? Mr. Ratan Pusty, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.P. Kale, counsel for respondent Np. 1. WRFT PmmON UN&ER ARTICLE 227 OF THE coNsmvrioN OF INDIA ORDER (07.10.2010) Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 7.11.2008 passed by learned Industrial Court" bench oit Bilaspur in Civil Appeal No. 19/CeiRA/III/08 whereby learned Industrial Court has atlowed the applieation os filed by respondent No. l under Section 96-A x^ ^^ Twdus^no^ Relotions Aet directing the transfer of the cose bearing No.84/C@IRAA)5 pending before the leamed Ubour €ourt, Korba to Labour Court, Bilospur. This petition wos filecl on 27.11.2008, however, no stay was gronted in favour of the petitioner and during the pendency of the writ petition, the learned Labour Court- has finally decided the case on 30.7.2009. 2. It has been pointed out by counsel for the petittoner thot ogainst the order passed by the Labour Gourt-, Bilaspur an appeal was preferred before the Industrial Courl" ond the said appeal has also been decidedon 10.12.2009. Hefurt-her submits that ogainst the order of the Industriql Court, +he ^ petitioner is contemplating to file writ pet'ition before this Cour^. 3. Considering the facts A circumstonces of the ease, in particular the fact thot the casewhich wos 1^cmsferr'ed^froi» Labour Courl-, Korba to Labour Court, BMospur Itself^N®teeen decided and thereafl-er, the appeal has atso been clecided^ nothing survives for the adjudication by thtsCourt^. . 4. The petition is thus dispo^d of. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge