IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2008 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1554 of 2008() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.17437/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- HAIDERALI, S/O. ENUDDIN HAJI, KOTTARAPPAT HOUSE, PUNNAYOOR AMSOM, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- JESTIN.O.J, S/O. JOSEPH, PRASANNA, SECRETARY, CHAVAKKAD TALUK RURAL HOUSING SAHAKARANA SANGAM, REGISTRATION NO. R 344, P.O. PAVARATTY. BY ADV.SRI.N.J.JOHNSON, S.C. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.1554 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the respondent has placed before me the original of a representation dated 22.9.2008, shown to have been received on 3.10.2008. It is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent that on quantifying the amount, the petitioner did not want to pay it. It is a matter of record even as per the said representation that the loan was for an amount of Rupees Two Lakhs way back in 1999 and the award, which has become final, is now pending execution before the competent civil court. I do not find any ground to initiate proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act. The contempt case fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.