w E iit Petitia FETiTiGE’ER Amar Nath Singh Yaiiav, sin I ,aff: Hargun Singh Vaclav, aged about 4S yams, pr€S€ntly working as Craft Teachér, Govi. High $611001, Gamihi N Distn‘ci Surguja Chhattisgarll. Vargas §E§P9K§EEIT§ 1. Stata *f J11 DKS ChhattEgarh 2. (30mmisaiager, Tribal Daavehpmcni, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ‘ A$Sist211t Commi$SLn r, Tribal We fm‘e axld Deveiopmfmt, Fxmbikayur, Dis“ Surguja, Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh . Secondary School, Shivprasad Nagar, Districi Surguja, Chhattisgarh. WEJT PETE§E IT UBIDER ARTEQLE 22E”! ‘22? F THF CGHSTET3EG§ 6F EEDEA WM 6'\ J\I‘ agar, Ambikapur, Wslfare emf}. jg 4 L Shri Pankaj Shi‘ivasfava, Comma} far fhfi petiibnar. Shri Ashok Shulda, cmmsel for responden fate] respondents Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Pajlei La‘vvyt‘r for thé S N0. 1 {G 4. (nag.cREER {23 . 1 1.2mm N §UNEL K§MAR gEEHA J. Heam. Laarned coimse? fm‘ fh€ nefitinnar S11 L petitioner 11‘; presrmtiv warking m1 fhe pay 0f Craft Teachm‘ in GrNahmmn? High Schnak Gandhi Nagar, Amhikapur, Surgnjag‘CG} He was appointe as fha Cmf? 29.3 1Q87. is: Divisiou Teacher; Headmaatali ant} \.\\ tha next higher pos-.‘r, {mm fha past of Craff Taacher i$ 11w: past 0f District T€achm~ Hr: also snhmits: that the yogi m“ Craft Taacher squivalen’r f0 thé point of Upper t NOE‘ hmits that thf: ‘“*"“""‘ wan: CmJRT*m? ‘—N €HHA‘E‘THgagxQH. giLASPUR “H . 495mgm34 11-ttisgarh, Through Sacretaiy Mini§y of Tribai Wclfare. ("y, Deve‘lopmeut Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raiyur, 4. CoHector, Ambikapm; Di$triet Surguja, 5n Shri GP, Ttipa’thi, Lactarcr, Gcvt. Higher d w Em 2 w ‘WP. {3"} Nn.4950/'ZGO4 é/vL Lactiii‘er, Ha snhmits that respondrant No.5 was. appeinhid a$ an Assi$taj1t Teacher on 30.1 .1979 and was; pmmni‘ad f0 the ‘post of UJ’LT. on 15.5.1992. Theregfter, hf: was plummet} t0 ?he pcsf 0f i£chlrer on Q37. KER am} presenf1y ’ma iS working on the post of §£Ctm~€r €171 Gnvt. Higher Secondmy SchfmL Shivprasad Nagm"; Di$tricf Surguja{CG}. He submits that when the post of Craft Teacha‘r is: equivaient ta the pasf 0f U.D.’F.; $11en, the pe‘titioner was Hoiding the Same statiis a», 0f resyomie‘nf No.5. (m 15.5.1992, Whem mspondanf No.5 was: Fromnta} f5 the. pngi nf U.D.T. and fharEaftar f0 the Emmi 0f Egctumr on Q.7.1998. Tha petitimwen who was; a5mittemy senior to respondent N05 m1 the: pOSt of U.D,T.Shou?d hava £130 bmn p1‘omnte5 f0 the pom: af lgcturer W.e.f. 97.1QQ8) which has not haen dome in case of f’nf: petitionar. He snhmits fh‘at many represa‘ntatimm have: hafm mar} by thf: petitioner, but on acfion has heen fakon in this regard. He maka$ a limited prayer hat for the present; this Fetition may he: dioyoset} of with a dimotion to the patitionm‘ to fiki a fTash ropreoentation before respondent No.2 ano mSpondent No.2 may aka be dii‘octod to dispose of the sai‘d mpmsonfation within the Etipumtod poriori granteo by this Court. ¢ This; Hmitad prayar made 11y leamed oo‘amSol for the petitioner is not ogaposer} hy teanmr} oormse‘u for the, State. The prayer is aHowat} . H. is director} that if So adviSerL the pat‘itionor may file; a ootaiied rapresantation atong with a copy of this order and a copy of writ petition before reopondent No.2 within a perioti of 3 woaks from today ant} if such a. myresentation is; tiled, responriont No.2 shat} dispose of tho Same. at: Eariy aS poasih‘ie profarahiy Within a period of further three months from the (fate of receipt of the representationjn an ohjective manner. Witn the aforesaid ohaervationsidirections; this petition stand$ finalhf dispoeed of. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/— Sunita