IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 470 of 2008 Sajjeed & Others. …… Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others. ..…. Respondents Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, Assistant Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, Assistant Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Respondent nos. 1 & 2 have filed the counter affidavit. 3. Mr. Nandan Arya, the learned Assistant Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous, as the police, after the completion of the investigation, did not find any case worth filing charge sheet against the petitioners and as such, a final report is proposed to be submitted in the case before the concerning court in the near future. 4. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the further direction that the interim order dated 24th June, 2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report in the case before the concerning court. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 24.09.2008 V.K.