IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.168 of 2008 DR.S.M.NAQUI IMAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 18.11.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Vigilance . In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for directing further investigation in the case and for direction to the respondents to seize some of the vital documents which are still in custody of the accused persons. Some of the accused persons are employees of the petitioner employed by the M.S.Zareef College of Education. The petitioner is the Ptresident of Rauf Muslim Jamia, a minority Society affirmed for establishinhg educational institution. The learned counsel submits that M. S.Zareef College is a fake college and the office bearers of the college established the alleged fake institution and illegally used the name of the ‘Jamia’ to shield their unlawful acts in the garb of recognized muslim minority institution of which the petitioner had no knowledge and had no role in the same. It is submitted that the office bearers and employees of M.S.Zareef.College started giving fake certificates and when the aforesaid facts came to general notice they tried to implicate the office bearers of Rauf Muslim Zamia. He further states that the accused persons of Rauf Muslim Jamia are innocent. It is submitted that some of the documents are still in custody of the aforesaid college of the institution. The learned counsel for the Vigilance submits that as 2 per direction of the Governor of Bihar an F.I.R. was lodged after due verification. In the aforesaid case chargesheet was submitted and cognizance has already been taken on 10.8.2007. He submits that the petitioner is one of the chargesheeted accused persons. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties this Court finds no merit in this application with regard to the further investigation. As such the aforesaid prayer is rejected. So far the second prayer in respect of seizing vital documents still in possession of the college is concerned this Court is of the view that the police may consider the desirability of seizing such documents if the same would be any further relevant in the case. The aforesaid observations of this Court will in no manner come in the way of proceeding in the learned court in seisin of the case.The petitioner must appear at the earliest in the case as cognizance had been taken on 10.8.07. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)