IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1309 of 2008 THAKUR PRASAD SINGH, SON OF LATE MUKHALAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHAKAN BIGHA, P.S. BARUN, DISTRICT AURANGABAD, BIHAR. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION CIRCLE, DEHRI-ON-SONE, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION DIVISION, DEHRI-ON-SONE, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION SUB-DIVISION, SONE NAGAR, AURANGABAD (BIHAR) ---Respondents ----------- 2. 30.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent-Board stating therein to the effect that the claims of the petitioner as stated in paragraph 7 of the writ application have been considered and the admissible payment has been made as indicated in letter no.304 dated 21st of April, 2009 (Annexure A) wherein it is stated the payment has been made through different cheques detailed therein. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that still the full amount of overtime dues has not been paid. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as regards the balance payment on account of overtime, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Executive Engineer, Transmission Division, Dehri-On-Sone, District Aurangabad (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed 2 within a period of six weeks stating specific detail with regard to the claim of overtime, which, according to the petitioner, has not been paid, the same shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)