mm^i f ^r^fW iiiw-sn (L^\ sr-e-s } IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. HS^ /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ...-•: 0XI ^. \v-; ^^^ ^w-^ s>.q.» a ..'-• ^I^S •y^&y p--"'^y Jagnarayan Sahu, S/o (late) D.G. Sahu, aged about 36 years, presently posted as Head Constable (DCRB) at Office of Superintendent of Police, Baikunthpiu-, District Koriya(C.G-) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. Superintendent of Police / Disciplinary Authority , District Koriya, Baikunthpur, Koriya (C.G.) ^3. Rajeshwar Singh As Enquiry Office Sub Divisional Officer (Police) Manendragarh, Tehsil- Manendragarh, District- Koriya (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDMl ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ..^s- ~1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRITPETITION(S) No. 486 of2010 Jagnarayan Sahu. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTIQN OF DMDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J, Present: Shri MAendra Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents 1 & 2. ORALORDER (Passed on Q2"s day of February, 201Q) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the representation dated 30.11.2009 (Annexure P/12) expeditiously. 2. It is ordered aecordingly. 3. The Director General of PoUce, Raipur is directed to considered and decide the representation ofthe petitioner, as atbrestated, as esq>editiously as possible, on its own merits and perspective. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. '~ g^/. SATISH K. AGNMOTRI Judge Amit