FAO 18/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. PK Deka, learned counsel for the appellants, who submits that subsequent to the order, dated 14-06-2010, passed in Misc. (J) Case No. 166/2009 , which had arisen out of an application made, under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in Title Suit No. 239 of 2009, whereby the learned Civil Judge No. III, Kamrup, Guwahati, rejected the prayer for injunction and also vacated the earlier direction, which had been given to t he parties to maintain status quo, the respondents herein, who were defendants i n the said suit, have been, according to the appellants, threatening to disposse ss the plaintiffs from the suit land. The present appellants, therefore, accordi ng to Mr. Deka, do not press this appeal inasmuch as they would file necessary a pplication in the learned Court below seeking appropriate interlocutory orders. In view of the submissions noted above and in the interest of justice, t his appeal is disposed of as not pressed with liberty granted to the appellants to make appropriate interlocutory application(s) and/or such other application(s ) as may be deemed necessary. If such an application is made, the learned Court below shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law.