IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1422 of 2009. Sanjay Kashyap, S/O Narendra Kumar Kashyap, R/O Kora Devi Colony, Khadkhadi, Haridwar, District Haridwar. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. UCO Bank, Branch Haridwar, Distt. Haridwar through its Branch Manager. 2. Collector, District Haridwar. 3. Tehsildar, Haridwar, District Haridwar. …Respondents. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no.1-Bank. Mr. K.P.Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C., learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. Date April 01, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the recovery certificate/citation dated 29-7-2009 as contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition. According to the petitioner, he took a loan of Rs. 90,000/- from the respondent-bank on 26-2-2008 for purchase of Photostat machine through Pradhanmantri Rozgar Yojna and the loan was to be payable within a period of five years at monthly instalment of Rs. 2200/-. The petitioner could not deposit the amount of instalments for some unavoidable circumstances. Ultimately, the recovery citation(Annexure-1) was issued against the petitioner. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation in easy quarterly instalments. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent no.1-Bank, Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate, has submitted that the 2 respondent-Bank would have no objection if the entire outstanding amount against the petitioner along with recovery charges is deposited by the petitioner in not more than three equal quarterly instalments. In the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to pay the entire outstanding amount under the impugned recovery citation (Annexure-1 to the petition) in three equal quarterly instalments before the Recovery Officer along with recovery charges. The first quarterly instalment shall be payable by the 1st day of June 2010 and the subsequent instalments shall fall due by the 1st day of the month after every three months thereafter. It is made clear that in case the petitioner fails to deposit any of the quarterly instalments, as directed above, the respondents would be at liberty to recover the entire outstanding amount along with recovery charges from the petitioner in lump-sum. Accordingly, the impugned recovery citation (Annexure-1) shall not be given effect to by the respondents. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP 3