IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2010 / 12TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2445 of 2010(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MINI RAJU, AGED 37 YEARS, W/O.RAJU, THUNDUKKATTIL VEETTIL, MEZHUVELI MURI, & VILLAGE, KOZENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.SETHUNATH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. SHAJI, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.KESAVAN, OTTAPLAVUNIKKUNNATHIL VEETTIL, MEKKANDAM MURI & THANNITHODE VILLAGE, KOZENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.2445 of 2010-E ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the Ist day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows: “ to issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ direction or order to the Ist respondent not to interfere in civil dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent”. 2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows:--Petitioner and 2nd respondent entered into an agreement for sale of the property owned by the petitioner and her husband (Ext.P1). According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent did not keep his promise. It is stated that the agreement period is expired. It is also stated that when a new purchaser approached the petitioner and when he was about to enter an agreement with the petitioner for an amount higher than the amount mentioned in Ext.P1, the 2nd respondent made a complaint to the Ist respondent and the petitioner was forcibly taken to the Ist respondent's office and W.P.C.No.2445/2010 -2- one Head Constable named Mathew Varghese threatened the petitioner registering cases against the petitioner and her husband. 3. We had directed the learned Government Pleader to get instruction in the matter. Today, when the matter was taken up, learned Government Pleader submitted that police will not interfere in the civil dispute between the parties. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is closed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS