IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28009 of 2011 Sheo Pujan Sah, son of Nagina Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 25.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner has been implicated merely on suspicion and the Informant has been examined during trial but has not supported the case and the petitioner undertakes to be physically present on each date of the trial so that it would be concluded expeditiously. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 52 of 2011 arising out of Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 278 of 2007 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit 2 shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)