IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-22522 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 6.10.2009 Gurdass Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.P.S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab for the State. Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate for the complainant. .... MAHESH GROVER, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to the orders dated 18.8.2009 the petitioners have since joined the investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer and besides this, a compromise has been effected inter se between the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has not disputed the factum of compromise. Having regard to the aforesaid, the interim directions dated 18.8.2009 are hereby made absolute till the filing of the challan subject to the condition that the petitioners continue to comply with the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands allowed. 6.10.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss