BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.10915 of 2011 P. CHANDRASEKAR :PETITIONER / ACCUSED -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY, TRICHY DISTRICT. :RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.SUNDAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under section 420 IPC., in Crime No.Not Known of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no case has been registered against the petitioner. 4.Considering the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner However, I am inclined to give a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of petition enquiry. The respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. 5.With the above direction,this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. sd/- 22/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Trichy, Trichy District. +1. CC to M/S. R.SUNDAR Advocate SR.No.28455. RP/24.08.2011/1P/4C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10915 of 2011 Date :22/08/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/