IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.36639 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 9, 2011 RAM PAL ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that because cancellation report has been moved, as per reply filed on behalf of the respondent-State, the case has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. August 9, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?