IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 16356 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- DIPIKABEN KARSANBHAI PARMAR Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 16356 of 2003 MR PS CHAMPANERI for Petitioner No. 1 MR PRADIP BHATE A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1,4 MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent No. 2 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 3,4 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 23/08/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1.0. The petitioner, President of the Ahmedabad District Panchayat wanted to appoint Shri Kishorbhai C. Gaud as Personal Assistant, but in view of the serious allegations against the said officer, he was not given appointment. However, with the consent of the petitioner, Shri Kishorbhai C. Gaud is now transferred to Vastrapur as Deputy Accountant. 2.0. In that view of the matter, the prayer which has been made by the petitioner cannot be granted in view of the fact that the petitioner herself has granted consent with regard to transfer of Shri Gaud on 29th July, 2004 and subsequently, on the same date, Shri Gaud has already been transferred to Vastrapur as Deputy Accountant. The said consent letter is ordered to be taken on the record. 3.0. In view thereof, the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief if any, stands vacated. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/