The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition Nos.24601, 24568, 24569 & 24575 of 2011 Date: 12.10.2011 Common Order: All these Writ Petitions involve identical set of facts and therefore, they are being heard and disposed of by this Common Order. The petitioners in these Writ Petitions have questioned the action of the respondents, in seeking to demolish the respective structures raised by them, mainly on the ground that the respondents have not followed due process of law before seeking to demolish the same. At the hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, representing the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the petitioners have raised constructions without applying for or obtaining building permissions and that the purported applications, under the Building Penalisation Scheme (for short ‘BPS’), said to have been filed by the petitioners, do not pertain to the properties belonging to them and that they have manipulated the applications by making use of the application numbers pertaining to the premises unconnected with the petitioners. At the hearing, Sri Harsh Kumar Asthana, learned Counsel for the petitioners, fairly conceded to the above position. Inasmuch as the buildings constructed by the petitioners are without any permission, this Court is not inclined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere with the proposed action by the respondents to demolish the unauthorised structures. As regards the allegation that the petitioners have manipulated the BPS applications by making use of the application numbers pertaining to the premises unconnected with the petitioners, respondent No.1 is directed to examine this issue and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, for prosecution of the petitioners. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petitions are dismissed. As a sequel, WPMP.Nos.30211, 30168, 30169 & 30180 of 2011, in WP.Nos.24601, 24568, 24569 & 24575 of 2011 respectively, are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 12th October, 2011 LUR