IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2302 of 2007 RAJ KUMAR YASHWANT, S/O Bijay Narayan Ram, R/O Village Beldarwa, P.O. Oraiya, Block Adapur, P.S. Adapur, District East Champaran. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Education Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 4. The District Education Superintendent Cum District Programme Co- ordinator, Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan, East Champaran, Motihari. 5. The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 6. The Block Development Officer, Adapur Block, East Champaran. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Adapur Block, East Champaran. 8. Sri Ganesh Ram, S/O Sri Bibhichan Ram, R/O Village Katgenwa, P.O.Bakhtaur, P.S. Adapur, East Champaran. ----------- 3 28.09.2010 Mr. S.R. Sharan, learned counsel for the petitioner as with regard to the following relief:- “(a)For direction to the Respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the merit list prepared for appointment on the post of teacher in the Adapur Block, District East Champaran because several of the candidates having lessor marks have been included in the merit list while the name of the petitioner has been deliberately not included in a most discriminatory, malafide and arbitrary manner. (b)Further for direction to the Respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner as per his merit for the appointment on the post of teacher in the Adapur Block.” would fairly submit that such grievance of the petitioner in the first instance has to be looked into by the District Teachers Appellate Authority in terms of an order issued by the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department dated 14.5.2009 holding that all complaints related to appointment on the post of Panchayat Shikshak has to be gone into by the said authority. 2 That being so, the stand of counsel for the State in the counter affidavit that in the meantime Panchayat Sachiv would be the competent authority to look into grievance of the petitioner does not seem to be any longer correct and accordingly this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority as with regard to grievance raised in this writ application. With the aforementioned observation this application is permitted to be withdrawn. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)