^vr^^49/ ^^ ^-SSi^"""" ^^"y ?<^'....-+ \^-"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR ^. • \« Bench' C.R.^o, ^4- OF 2006 REVISIONERS: y * ^EESPONDENT: 1. Shanker Singh, son oflate Shri Jagmohan Singh, 2. Smt. Amrit Bai, wife of late Shri "' Jagmohan Singh, Both residents of village Nawagaon, tehsil Katghora, district Korba (C.G.) (Objector) VERSUS Singh, son of Shri Budhwar Singh, resident of village Nawagaon, tehsil Katghora, district Korba (Chhattisgarh) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. XI-HC-22 ^Ti^T^r f^Ti^^n^T 5h<-3ich ^Tf^T /(-• Su^u6^ :2~^ •s^ t ^ra'T[^, fN^TRiy .^ww<^w^ ..c.^-..:..m:. '^ 2006 fe^y ^¥i'^rrwHf^r 26.6.2006 Civil Revision No. 84/2006 fil^d Shri Somnath Verma, couns^ Heard onadmission. This petition has been direct^d passed in Execution Case No. 4-A? Judge Class-1, Katgohora, District- impugned order, an application Civil Procedure, raising grbunds of incompetentpersons and also that who were not the parties in the ci| Executing Court. A perusal of the order pas^ show that the execution proceedin^ decree holder namely-Budhwar Sinyh applicants are also the successors jn the tast para of the order Singh. Leaying all these pointsapajrt, argues that the proceedings of In the present case, the dismissed, appears to be correct admit this petition for hearing furthe|r However, the applicants shall be a1| and all other points before the ^TF^Fft;T "RP^ ^ 1:t^t T^RZR ^ sti^m- 3Tf^r II for theapplicants. against the prder dated 27.2.2006 H969, periding iri the Court of Civil -|<orba(CG). It appears that by the under Section 47 of the Code of ^xecution being filed on behalf of the has been filed against the persohs, ij/il suit, has been dismissed by the ^ed by the Execula'ng Court, would js have been filed by the son of the tt would also show that the non- J3f the judgment debtor. It has come that Sh^ankar Singh isthe son ofJagmohan ntsapajrt, learned counsel forthe applicants exe4ution were barred by limitation. grjound on which objection has been reasonable. 1 am not inclined to r. The present petition is dismissed. liberty to raise the point of limitation Exec|uting Court, ifso advjsed. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ahd \