IN THE MADHYA PRADESH STATE ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH AT JABALPUR, ^(^) •2./3^/OJ- SMT.SAROJ BAL.A.SHYA6 BISHON1: ,WIFE OF SHRI MANOJ BI 8HON;t, OCCU i; ASSTT„PROFESSOR ,HOME SCIENCE CiOVT . V I VEKANAND COL.LEGE ,MANENDRAGARH DISTTBSARGUJA APPl...^CANTS ••III -VERSUS- DSTATE OF MADNYA PRADESHS THROUGH s ©ECRETARY HI6HER EDUCATION,VALLABH BHAWAN,BHOPAL 2)COMMISSIONK:R HIOHER EDUCATI ON, 8ATPURA. BHAWAN,BKOPAL .3 ) 11. P. PUBL.IC SERVICE COMMISSION THROU6H s SECRETARY,RESIDENCY AREiA, INDORE 4)PRINCIPAL OOVT.VIVEKANAND COLLrfGE MANENADRAGARH,SAR6UJA , RKSPONDENTS DETAILS OF PETITION ^3vS[ '^<|«icl>«,tP^I^I<l<»,R«l<«^ _,_ ^^,fs-') ^. ^\^^^~ __ __^ TFTcCT^^TT^ 3H^9T tRq»(^clijcltg) STT^^TqnRlicp cT2ff3n^5T»4li<P Tumane f^RITW^fll^T 3TT^5T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MoMan Shrivastava. J. 20-01-2010 called When the matter was petitioner ahd the matter was pa^ed appears for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Pan^l &4. None for respondent No.3. Taking into consideration petitbn, thesame is dismissed fc|r reserved to the petitioner to revi^] Survives. A copy ofthe order be s^nt <pi<<Fo<nti ^i+ioi 'tff®^xRit$i^ ^srf^Tsn^^T for hearing, none appeared for the over Even in the second round, none 1 Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1, 2 he nature of controversy invotved in the want of prosecution. However, liberty is fQ the petition, if the cause of action still to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Manindra Mohah Shrivastava Jude