EIGH GGURT (3F CHHATTISGARH, £ILAS?UR W.P. (S) No. 5728 of 2007 PETITI$NER RK. Pajkra‘ S/o $hri Budh Ram Pajkra, agfgd abcut 39 yam, Occupaiion Vajgyanik Adhikari (Scisntigt), Mobile Unit, Scale of’ C1im€, Rajgarh, District Raigarh (C. G.) Verw RES?QNDENT$ 1 Stats of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretazy Departmeat of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Ellawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Director, Forénsic, Science Laboratoxy, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector, Distn'ct Raigarh (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 ()F THE ‘ CQNSTETUTIGN GF INDIA Aggearangg Shri SD. Singh, Counscl for the petitioncr, Shri Ajay Dwivcdi, Pane} Lawycr for the State. GRAL «mom (93.19200?) SUmL KiiMAR Sil‘iHA, J Heard. The petitioner. who 1‘s working on the post ofScierm'st in Mobile Unit, Raigarh, has been transferred to Forensic Science 7i Laboratory, Raipur by order daterl 25] 1 I 2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parents of the petitioner areold, who are residing with him and he is having two smau school going children, studying in LKG and Class-H in Local Institution, therefore, it would be difficult for the petitioner to go on transfer from Raigarh to Raipur. These are not the grounds for interfering in the order of transfer by a Court of law. Unless the order of transfer is Vitiated by malaiides or extraneous consideration or is against any statutory Rules or Act, it. cannot be interfered by a Court of Law, is the settled View of the Apex Court. Shyna W.P’(S) No.5728 0f 2007 For the foregoing masons, I am not inclined to admit thiS potition for hoaring; This petition is dismEsod at tho motion Stags itself. Howovar, so far as pexsonal diflc’ulties of tho petitioner am ooncomed, he may tile a dotailod representation before the concemed authon'ty, who shajl be free to diepose of the same at the earliest in accordance with iaw. M’ 1 i sal- { Suni! Kumar Sinha Judge —