IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7029 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.4.2010 Ramesh Chander ....Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Narender Kumar, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. By way of instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to further direct his staff in copy branch to issue the copy of the order dated 1.10.2009 passed by respondent No.3 in the case titled as “Ramesh Chander v. Om Parkarsh etc.” decided on 1.10.2009, for which application was submitted on 14.10.2009 vide Annexure P-1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 17.2.2010 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and he shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to him to take action on the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take action on the representation (Annexure P-2) sent by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. April 21, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE