Writ Petition No. 12/0 12001. PETITIONER Mamrannan Mama s/o Bpemra Hath Manda]. a ed abaut 35 years,caste Namcsudra Bengali) Occupation Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Vika spe111,Block Koilibeda,T&h§.1 Pakhanjore,Distt: KANKER (chhatti sgaxh) . VERSUS RESPowENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgam through the Secretary,Panohayat Deperment, D.K .Bhawan, RAIPUR(Chhatt1 sgarh) . The Collec tor,KAbKER(Chhatt1 sgarh) . Chief Executive Officer;Block Koilibeda,Tahsil Pakhanjor, D1 stt: KABKER (Chhetti sgarh) . Manku Ram Goad, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Toke Jeleb1,Block Ko111beda, ‘1 D1 stt s KANKER (Chhatti sgarh) . ERI‘T PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF TIE CONSTITUTION OF IMIA-FOR ISSUmE OF WHT/ OWER/DIWCTION 63 OTHER WMTS/OWERS/ IN TEE LIKE NATUm. %;§$m wF ymi a 1.3.2001 Shrl R N Jha for the petitioner. Shri A.K.Tiwari, P.L. i for the respondents. MW Em: ugahsr'" mm yea mar afén ‘§%E§¥a¥%%?g;§ag h ?_ 4 Heard. The relie£s Claimed in § this petition are that the petltloner should be allowed t continue without any fear and f apprehension in his mind. I § f i O T‘’‘"T'T’”"I'‘’‘"‘3I"‘-.. ""f‘" "'—"‘ ".7 f"" Thi§ relief i l ls prayed for because according to the 1.petltloner there ls so-much pressure put €‘upon him to remova him from senvice. 1 L e‘oeum-‘ r.-.__...‘ a However, it appears that since he is continuing as Secretary, on xnmk mere apprehens1on it is not poes1ble for this lCourt to issue any direction not to remove ihim or to take any action against him. ‘Therefore, in my View, the relief that he should not be removed is not available in the present writ petition. i V The second relief as regards his pay M ! and allowances said to have been withheld Without giVing any reason from October 1999 i i I i q“ ~- ..—-‘.’....._.... " The petition is disg >osed of . , Sdl- Gxief Jusu'ce Q3 k Méw XLHC-22 ‘ minim, I I ‘ . cbkkbsgw») { -E~{/mw\ m I 1 Lv - . .....................................m > 2 .............................................. ................................................ WWW Wam‘ifsam kmm till date. Counsel represamting the ’ reSpondents doés not controvert this part , of the allegation. In my view, if that is so, the relief as regards 1he Claim of payment of remuneration to the petjLtioner should be allowed. In the result, the petition is disposed of with direction that the writ petitioner shall be paid his pay and allowances w.e.f. October 1999 till date. Arrears of pay an& allowances shall be released to the petitioner within one month from the éate of receipt of this wder. Further, thereafter as long as the petitioner continues tc Serve as Secretary, J l he shall be entitled to get pay and allowances prescribed in this regard i egularly.