IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1314 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2613 of 2009 With Interlocutory Application No. 6469 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1314 of 2011. ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad, son of Karu Prasad, resident of Village – Kamalbigha, P.O. Bilari, P.S. Katrisarai, District – Nalanda, Presently resides in Mohalla – Patel Nagar, Near Azad Lodge, P.S. Nawadah, District – Nawadah, at present posted as Accounts Clerk (under dismissal), Building Division, Jahanabad .... .... Petitioner / Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Building Construction and Housing Department, Bisheshwaraia Bhawan, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 3. The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction and Housing Deptt., Gaya Building Circle, 4. The Executive Engineer, Building Division, Gaya, 5. The Executive Engineer, Building Division, Jahanabad .... .... Respondents / Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal, GA 1 and Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, AC to GA 1. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 19-09-2011 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 6469 of 2011. The delay of 14 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Patna High Court LPA No.1314 of 2011 (2) dt.19-09-2011 2 / 2 2 Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1314 of 2011. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 11th July 2011 made by the learned single Judge in above CWJC No. 2613 of 2009, the writ petitioner, a dismissed engineer in the government service, has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. The learned single Judge has set aside the order of dismissal and has allowed the disciplinary proceeding to proceed in accordance with law and has directed that during the interregnum period the appellant would be under suspension. We agree with learned single Judge. No case for interference is made out. Appeal is dismissed in limine. Dilip. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)