§‘=iiGH COURT OF CHHATTESGNQH AT BiLilSPUR BIVISKNV BENCH Coram : HON’gLE $i‘iRi @JEEV GUPTA, (1.3. & f‘ION’BLE $HR§ SUNH. KUMAR $§N%§A, J. Writ Petiticm No. 6219 of 29135 PETiTiONER : Smt. Sushila. W/o Chaitar Singh Chanap, Cas2e Halba (S.T.), Gram- Ganjaidm. Poiice Station & Tah- Dandilohara, Post Office —- Sanjari, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus QESPONDEN’m 1. State of Chhattisgarh represented bythe Heme Secreiary, Ra§pur. 2. 8uperintendent of Police';’&urg. Letter Petition Pfesent: Shri Prateek Sharma, iearned Amicus Curiae for the petitioner. Shri MP8. Bhatia, ieamed Eeputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER {13m March, 2ees) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. This writ petition came to be registered on the letter sent by one Smt. Sushiia Bai aiieging that her son Puransingh Chanap, Constabie in Chhattisgarh Poiice was missing since 13-04-2008. 2. In the return and additionai return filed on behalf of the $tete, it has been categorically stated that all possibie efforts were made by the police to trace out the missing person «- Puransingh Chanap, but unfortunately he couid not be traced out $0 far. 3. Shri MRS. Bhatia, ieamed Deputy Government Advocate submiis that the poiice shalt continue to make sincere efforts to trace ouf the missing person — Puransingh Chanap in fuiure a§so. 4. In this View of the matter, we are satisfied ihat no further monii‘oring of the maiter in this wrér petition, now; is required. M” i d (3’ i 5. The writ petition, thus: stands disposed of My“ Sd/- sd/- i r Chief Jusrice if mmmi i