IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 463 of 2004 BETWEEN: 1 R.Parvathamm, W/o.R.Nagaraju, R/o.Allapuram Village, Kundurpi Mandal, Ananthapur district. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, Ananthapur 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur District. 3 K.Deveerakka, W/o.K.K.Naganna, Allapuram Village Kundurpi Mandal, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in appointing the 3rd respondent as permanent F.P.Shop Dealer for Allapuram Village of Kundurpi Mandal, Ananthapur district vide D.Dis.(F) 577/2003 dt.29.12.2003 though she is not having minimum Educational Qualifications as required under guidelines is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of G.O.Ms.No.671 Food & C.A Department dt 30.11.1996 and G.O.Ms.No.198 F CS& C.A.C.C.S.(V) Department dt 5.2.1996 and in violation of the Art.14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue a fresh notification inviting applications from the eligible candidates to appoint permanent F.P.Shop Dealer for Allapuram Village, Kundurpi Mandal, Ananthapur district. For the Petitioner:MR.S.D.GOWD Advocate. For the Respondent Nos. 1 & w2: The GP FOR Civil Supplies. The Court at the stage of admission, made the following ORDER:- 2 A vacancy arose in fair price shop( FPS) Allapuram village of Anantapur District. Second respondent invited applications. Third respondent and one Smt. T.Satyamma applied. After conducting written test and interview and also getting their antecedents verified, second respondent appointed their respondent. The petitioner who is not even an applicant aspiring to be appointed as FPS dealer assails the order of second respondent in this writ petition. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner raised various grounds, this Court is not inclined to go into the matter. If the petitioner is so advised, she may file appeal before the Joint Collector against the order of second respondent appointing their respondent. As a when such appeal is filed, the Joint Collector may entertain the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal. No relief can be granted in this writ petition at present. The writ petition, with the above observations, is disposed of at the admission stage. Sd/- N.Macheswara Rao Asst.. REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Anantapur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,Dharmavaram.Ananthapur District. 3. Two CC’s to the G.P. for Revenue High Court of A.P. Hyderabad ( O.U.T.) 4. Two CD copies. 5. One CC to Mr.S.D.Gowd Advocate ( O.P.U.C.) Ty MKH C.By. HIGH COURT DT.8.1.2004 ORDER W.P.NO.463 OF 2004 DISPOSING OF THE PETITIONER AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION.