sat 1 wp 2010-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2010 OF 2011 Latika Subhash Bhosale ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondent Mr.R.V. Bansode for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. AUGUST 1, 2011 P.C. :- 1 We have heard Mr.Bansode, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. We have perused the impugned order setting out the detailed reasons. We have also perused Section 60 as well as Section 63AA of the Bombay Police Act. While leaving the issue of the petitioner's locus standi open, we have considered the reasons set out in the impugned order. We are satisfied that the order does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record to cause sat 2 wp 2010-2011 interference in this writ petition. 2 The petition is rejected summarily. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)