IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 915 of 2008 (M/S) Manish Verma S/O R.K.Verma, R/O 10, Gandhi Nagar, Dehradun, District Dehradun. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary Home, Secretariat, Dehradun and three others. … Respondents. Sri R.C.Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Date June 05, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Sri R.C.Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed for issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11-03-2008 (Annexure No.2) passed by respondent no.1, whereby the security of gunner was refused to the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the parties. A perusal of record shows, that the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 168 of 2008 (M/S), which was disposed of vide order dated 15-1-2008 with the following direction:- “In view of the above, petitioner may make representation before Secretary Home, State of Uttarakhand for redressal of his grievance, if representation is made Secretary, Home, State of Uttarakhand shall take decision on the representation of the petitioner preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of presentation of representation.” 2 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of rejection of his representation by the Government. It is within the domain of the Government to provide security of gunner to the petitioner or not. From a bare perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that the reports were called for from the District Magistrate and Senior Superintendent of Police Dehradun. The matter was considered by the Committee constituted for the purpose, which is headed by the District Magistrate. I do not find any perversity in the impugned order passed by the Principal Secretary, Home (Annexure No. 2). The writ petition is devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed outright at the threshold. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. All pending applications stand disposed of. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4