THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION No.175 OF 2009 ORDER: This Transfer Criminal Petition under Section 407 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners seeking to transfer C.C.No.495 of 2009 from the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, to any Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Guntur. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that several proceedings are pending between the parties at Guntur, such as the proceedings in matrimonial O.P., D.V.C. and a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. 4. In the circumstances, it is reasonable to transfer this matter also to Guntur. 5. Hence, it is directed that the C.C.No.495 of 2009 pending on the file of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, shall stand transferred to the Court of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Guntur. 6. The Transfer Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed. _____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated: 29-10-2009 Rns THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.51 and 52 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: As the parties to these two transfer petitions are one and the same, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. Both these Transfer Criminal Petitions are filed by the petitioner – accused under Section 407 Cr.P.C. seeking to transfer the cases in C.C.No.458 of 2004 and C.C.No.1261 of 2003 (renumbered as C.C.94 of 2008) from the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu, to that of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Kothagudem to be tried along with C.C.No.2055 of 2005. 3. Heard Sri A. Rajasekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P. Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.4. 4. It is not in dispute that three cases are pending between the parties. No doubt, one case in C.C.No.458 of 2004 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu is not directly between the parties, but one of the parties to the litigation is same. Considering the circumstances that the transaction in all the matters is one and the same and somewhat similar, it is desirable that all cases are to be tried at one Court. As two cases in C.C.458 of 2004 and C.C.No.1261 of 2003 (renumbered as C.C.94 of 2008) are pending at Yellandu, and one case in C.C.No.2055 of 2005 is pending at Kothagudem, it is desirable to transfer C.C.No.2055 of 2005 from Kothagudem to Yellandu. 5. Accordingly, C.C.No.2055 of 2005 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem is withdrawn and transferred to the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu, to be tried simultaneously, along with C.C.No.458 of 2004 and C.C.No.1261 of 2003 (renumbered as C.C.94 of 2008) and dispose of the same in accordance with law. 6. The Transfer Criminal Petitions are ordered accordingly. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Date: 11-08-2008 Rns THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.180 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners - Accused seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.38 of 2009 of Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and 354 of IPC read with 34 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. The material on record reveal that there are earlier litigations between the parties and a complaint is given by one of the present petitioners against the present complainants and some others. In the circumstances, there is every possibility of false implication. As such, there shall be stay of arrest of the petitioners till filing of charge sheet, if any. Investigation and consequential steps on the basis of result of investigation shall go on. 4. The Criminal Petition is accordingly disposed of. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Date: 22-01-2009. Rns