IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9853 of 2005 Between: M/s.Ravindra Industrial & Medical Gases Factory located in Plot No.1, IDA Nacharam, Hyderabad rep., by its Managing Partner M.Sidhardh Reddy, s/o Ravindra Reddy, r/o H.No.1- 8-702/32/46, Padma Colony, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P.Limited, rep., by its Managing Director, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer (Operations) Ranga Reddy Circle (NOrth), Gunrock, Secunderabad. 3 The Divisional Electrical Engineer, (Operations) Central Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd., Habsiguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner in response to the representations dt.9-8-2004 and 21-4-2005 filed for 11 KV H.T.Power Supply to the writ petitioner firm for a CMD of 180 KVA with a CL of 250 HP situated at Plot No.1, IDA, Nacharam,Ranga Reddy District by duly declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in not providing the same even after payment of security deposit of Rs.90,000/- and aso Rs.2,84,235/- towards non- refundable service line and developmental charges as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the true intent of the provisions of A.P.Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and pass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 9853 of 2005 ORAL ORDER: In this writ petition the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to consider its case for high tension power supply to their premises. It is submitted that during pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have already released power supply under HT category. In that view of the matter, no further orders are necessary. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________ 23-6-2009 asp