IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-29038 of 2010 Date of Decision: 30.09.2010 Sanjeev Bansal and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5. It is stated that respondent No.4, who is the wife of petitioner No.1 started compelling her husband to take his share from the inherited property and to start living with her at her parental home. Since petitioner No.1 refused to accept her demands then her behavior became worse and respondent No.5, who is the brother of respondent No.4 is an influential person of the locality and threatening the petitioner by making telephonic calls. Heard. The above averments appear to be matrimonical dispute and the same cannot be termed as `threat perception to life' inviting police security or any interference at this stage. Dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 30.09.2010 JUDGE gurpreet