IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2392 of 2006 SRI SARYU KUMAR VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 24.02.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and Learned counsel for Accountant General are present. The writ petition had been filed for payment of provident fund amount together with admissible interest. It has been admitted in paragraph 8 that the entire post retiral benefits pertaining to the wife of the present petitioner who died in harness on 24.9.2003 as Headmaster of Middle School, has since been paid to the petitioner except the provident fund amount. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the State and in paragraph 6 thereof it was stated that the G.P.F. together with admissible interest was paid on 30.8.2006 and thus the grievance of the petitioner stood redressed. However since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )