y HIGH OF CHHATTI8GARH AF BILASPCR WRIT PE 1IT10N (S) P.R. No. 7365 ofMm PETITIONER : Smt. Sifiya Bai aged about 23 years, W/o Padiiialoehan, R/^g Village Keraniuuda (Tiikda) Qraia Panchayat Ku^ibahara, Vikas Khand Basna, -Distt. MahasaiHuad(C.G.) . '''....: .^ l:ii VER8US RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, flirou^i Women Child Welfce Deparimflnt, DX.S. Raipur(C.G.) 2. Tlie Colkctor, Mahasamund. 3. The Project Officer, Child Development, ^ Matiasaniuad. ! ' " .,...,. ,^,.-.,.^. 4. The Chief Executive Qfficer, Janpad Panchayat, Basna, Distt. MahasaBiund. . ,.,;; 5. Smt. Vinodani' aged about 25 yeaiB. W/o Krishna. Rumar R/o Village Keramunda (Ttdcda^ <itani Pattchayat Kudribahara, Vikas Khand Basna, Distt. ••- Mahasamund:(C.G.) ,, ^'^.....eVT'.J'T1' WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITl.mON OF INDIA SB:_Hon'Me Sfari Sattsh K. AsnBiotol. J..' :" ' .: :1:':: .',;.. , Preserrt: ShriParagKotecha.AdvocatefbrthepetitioEKr. : ' • Sfari S.K.Mishra, Pansi Lawyer fiM-the State/respondects Lj»3.,!,,. ORALORDER . . ...^. •.,--• (Passedon24ttldayof Jauuary,2008^ L 1. Rule 3 aad 5 of tfae Cfatiattisgarh Panchayats' (Appeal and RCTision) ftules, 1995, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules, 1995')preyide8for appeal and revision against the order passed by flie Collectw. The petitioner has filed this petition without tafcmg recouree to statutory appeal provided under Rules, 199S, seeking extraordinaryjuHsdictionof this Court. This ft>rum is not availaUe to the petitroneT'as no^e»»ptional or extraordinary circumstaices exist^ to exercise jurisdiction in favour affhe petttkmer. f ....'' Thus, this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. However, ri^it is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to atemative.statutQiy^emedy that may be available to the petitioaer under the provisions ofRiitos. 1995. No order asto costs. ' Sd/- Satish K. Aenihotri Judge i- --....:if1 litUtntl