IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8232 of 2011 Shiv Kumar & another Vs. The Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala Cantt & others Present: Mr.K.G.Chaudhry, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners are alleged to have encroached upon a street. A complaint was made by his neighbour in this regard. The petitioners were afforded due opportunity to show that they have not encroached any street. They got full opportunity to lead the evidence which they exercised. The complainant had also then placed on record the material including the sale deed to show encroachment on the part of the petitioners. The submission that the petitioners had got a plan sanctioned would not suffice as the same sanctioned plan was cancelled. Submission is that the petitioners were not heard while ordering the cancellation. It would also be immaterial. Once the petitioners were given due and adequate opportunity by the authority passing the order to show that they had not encroached on any land, the cause to complain would not remain. The material, which was placed before the authorities, has been well analysed and thereafter impugned order was passed. The petitioners remained un-successful in appeal. I do not find any reason to interfere in the well reasoned order passed by the authorities concerned. The petitioners apparently seem to be persons, who have encroached upon the street. Dismissed. May 10, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE