IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2009 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 4894 of 2009(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. R.RAJESHWARI AMMA, SWEEPER, OFFICE OF THE EXECTUVE ENGINEER, DIVISION -II, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, TIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. S.VIMALA, SWEEPER, OFFIE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DIVISION -II, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. A.DAISY, SWEEPER CUM CLEANER, OFFICE FO THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DIVISION-II, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. DR.K.P.KYLASANATHA PILLAY SMT.V.J.SAFEENA SRI.S.SANJITH SMT.SHALEENA RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. HOUSING (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, DIVISION NO.II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN ADV. POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,SC.KSHB FOR R2 & R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.4894 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd April, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners are working as part-time sweepers under the Kerala State Housing Board. The main prayer in the Writ Petition is for a direction to the first respondent to confer the benefits of regularisation as ordered in Exhibit P2 dated 25.11.2005. 2. On behalf of the respondent, a counter affidavit has been filed. It is stated therein that the matter of regularisation of casual sweepers, including the petitioner has already taken up with the Government based on the decision of the Board dated 16.2.2008 and in accordance with Exhibit P2 Government order. In the light of the above, the first respondent will pass appropriate orders, after considering the proposal made by the second respondent in the light of the provisions contained in WP(C).4894/09 2 Exhibit P2 Government order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE vgs.