HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.11097 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2011 **** TP Acharya & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. Registrar of Societies & Firm, Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG Punjab Mr. VK Kaushal, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7 Mr. BR Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.8 to 10 **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The prayer in this writ petition is to direct respondents No.1 to 5 to take appropriate legal action, disciplinary and criminal, in accordance with law against respondents No.8 to 10 for the alleged bungling committed by them in the affairs of the Shree Gandhi Ashram, Amritsar. (2). Learned counsel for respondents No.4 to 7 fairly states that enquiry is nearing completion and the matter is under consideration of respondent No.4. (3). That being so, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to take an appropriate decision in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 25.03.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge