IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4910 of 2009 Between: Mohammed Abdulla Ba Suleman, S/o. Syeed Ba Sulaiman R/o.H.No.18-10-392, Barkas, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rajendranagar, R.R. District. 3 The Station House Officer, Rajendranagar P.S., Rajendranagar, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.LAYEEQ KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3, in summoning the petitioner to the police station and interfering in civil disputes, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. The facts contained in the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition, indicate that there is a dispute, regarding house plots bearing Nos. 6, 3, 4, 5 and 10, comprised in Survey No.95 admeasuring 3700 square yards, between the petitioner and another person viz., Mr. Vittal Reddy. O.S. No. 2329 of 2007 filed by the petitioner along with his vendors is pending before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar and O.S. No. 1660 of 2008 filed by Mr. Vittal Reddy is pending before the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar. The petitioner claims that the injunction granted in the suit filed by him and his vendors is subsisting as on today. The grievance of the petitioner is two fold viz., that his complaint given to respondent No. 3, against undue interference of Mr. Vittal Reddy, has not received the required action while respondent No.3, on being prevailed upon by the said Mr.Vittal Reddy, has been interfering with the life and personal liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station and harassing him to withdraw O.S. No. 2329 of 2007 filed by him. Though no counter affidavit is filed, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that the complaint filed by the petitioner was registered as Crime No.290 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code against Mr. Vittal Reddy and seven others and that the investigation is pending. As regards the grievance of the petitioner that respondent No.3 is interfering in civil disputes, she submitted that no such interference is being made by him or his subordinates and that only in connection with the investigation into the criminal case registered on the petitioner’s own complaint, respondent No.3 has summoned the petitioner. She conveys assurance of respondent No.3 to the Court that he will not interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and Mr. Vittal Reddy and others and the life and personal liberty of the petitioner. Having regard to the abovementioned assurance of respondent No. 3, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.6437 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 22.06.2009 KL/LUR