IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 56 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 56 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 56 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 3302 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 3302 OF 1998 SUIT NO. 3302 OF 1998 SION HILL VIEW CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SION HILL VIEW CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SION HILL VIEW CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & Anr. ...Petitioners SOCIETY LTD. & Anr. ...Petitioners SOCIETY LTD. & Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. Vs. Vs. Mrs. Sangeeta widow of Laxmandas Mrs. Sangeeta widow of Laxmandas Mrs. Sangeeta widow of Laxmandas Mankani ...Respondent Mankani ...Respondent Mankani ...Respondent Ms.Veenu Khatri i/b. M/s. Vijaykumar & Co. for the Ms.Veenu Khatri i/b. M/s. Vijaykumar & Co. for the Ms.Veenu Khatri i/b. M/s. Vijaykumar & Co. for the petitioners. petitioners. petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Joshi a/w P.V. Bhagat i/b. Vasant & Co. for Mr. Gaurav Joshi a/w P.V. Bhagat i/b. Vasant & Co. for Mr. Gaurav Joshi a/w P.V. Bhagat i/b. Vasant & Co. for Respondents. Respondents. Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. S.K.SHAH,J. DATE DATE DATE : 12th August,2005. 12th August,2005. 12th August,2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Contempt Petition is filed because the 1. This Contempt Petition is filed because the 1. This Contempt Petition is filed because the Respondents are not acting as per the decree passed in Respondents are not acting as per the decree passed in Respondents are not acting as per the decree passed in terms of the consent terms. Although certain terms of the consent terms. Although certain terms of the consent terms. Although certain undertakings are incorporated in the Consent Terms, undertakings are incorporated in the Consent Terms, undertakings are incorporated in the Consent Terms, they are not accepted by the Court. they are not accepted by the Court. they are not accepted by the Court. 2. Under the circumstances, there is no question 2. Under the circumstances, there is no question 2. Under the circumstances, there is no question of contempt of Court’s Order. It is only the decree of contempt of Court’s Order. It is only the decree of contempt of Court’s Order. It is only the decree which can be executed. The Petition is not which can be executed. The Petition is not which can be executed. The Petition is not maintainable. It is dismissed. maintainable. It is dismissed. maintainable. It is dismissed. ----- ----- ----- (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.) (S.K.SHAH,J.)