IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 23.09.2010 C.R.No.6155 of 2010 (O&M) Kuldip Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus Opinder Singh Bedi ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Ashok Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Defendants are in revision aggrieved against the order passed by the learned trial Court on 13.08.2010, whereby an application filed by the defendants to the effect that Chandigarh Court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit, has been dismissed. The learned trial Court has found that both plaintiff as well as the defendants are residing at Chandigarh and that the said fact has not been disputed by the defendants in their written statement. Therefore, in terms of Section 20 of the CPC, Chandigarh Court will have jurisdiction to entertain the suit. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial Court, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 23.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE