IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 6055 of 2011() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN BA.5054/2011 Dated 01/07/2011 CRIME NO.1190 OF 2011 OF KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- UNNIKRISHNAN @ UNNI, S/O.VENUGOPAL, AGED 33 YEARS, THAKIDIYIL HOUSE, PUZHANADU, OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NEDUMANGADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY P.P.SRI.V.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------- B.A.No.6055 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.1190 of 2011 of the Kottarakkara Police Station. Voicing such apprehension, the petitioner filed Bail Application No.5054 of 2011, which was disposed of as per the order dated 1st July, 2011. In that order, the submission made by the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner was only a suspect in the said crime and that he was not so far arrayed as an accused, was recorded. It was also held that in case it was required to interrogate the petitioner, the police shall do so only after giving the petitioner a notice under Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Now, the petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.1190 of 2011 of the Kottarakkara Police Station by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nedumangad. B.A.No.6055 of 2011 2 3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is a known criminal and he is in the history sheet of very many Police Stations. It is submitted that the petitioner is involved in several theft cases. The learned Public Prosecutor also submitted that the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nedumangad has no intention to arrest the petitioner in Crime No.1190 of 2011 of the Kottarakkara Police Station, except when the court issues a warrant. This submission is recorded and the Bail Application is closed as no further directions are required. It is made clear that if any court issues a warrant for arrest of the petitioner, the order in this Bail Application would be of no avail. It is also made clear that this order is confined only to Crime No.1190 of 2011 of Kottarakkara Police Station. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms