1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2918 OF 2009 Vinod S/o Sandipan Bhosale Versus State of Maharashtra and another *** Mr. N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. Mr. M. B. Sandanshiv for Respondent No.2. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 10th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Accused/ applicant, learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the Intervenor. In Crime No.36 of 2009 [RCC No.125 of 2009], the accused Vinod seeks bail, for an offence under section 498-A, 306 read with 34 of IPC. 2. The matrimonial relations of accused Vinod marrying Vanita on 28th January, 2007, is not in controversy. The unfortunate event occurred on 3rd May, 2009 when she was found hanged in the room, to a hook, which is around 5' to 6' away from ground level. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. The postmortem notes and particularly column 21 indicated that deceased Vanita was pregnant, carrying 20 to 22 weeks pregnancy. The uterus showed, it was a male child. 4. The subsequent development in the matter is 10 months old boy of said Vanita and present Accused/ applicant Vinod under direction of the Court is taken custody by the grand parent Haribhau Yeole. 5. The counsel for intervenor indicated that on 24th May, 2009 the brothers or other relations of the accused/ applicant, under the guise of meeting the infant Sonu, thrashed the complainant Haribhau as to why he is prosecuting the matter. 6. The conduct of brothers or relations of the accused to thrash speaks for itself. There were statements of Bhagwan, Eknath, Gautam from Pargaon Ghumra. They are not forming part of charge sheet. However, counsel for the accused has 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. its copy, which he read during the course of his submissions. 7. Though I quite see that the accused is in custody from 4th May, 2009 and charge sheet is filed, the nature of accusations and the manner in which deceased expired, does not warrant release of the accused on bail. Consequently, application rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:10/09/2009. ans/2918