IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 382 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Deep Chandra Agarwal s/o Jai Dutt Agarwal; 2. Neeraj Agarwal s/o Deep Chandra Agarwal, R/o Smiti Photo Studio Kaladunghi Road, P.S. Kotwali, Haldwani, District Nainital ……. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Uttaranchal, through Its Secretary(Home), Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali, Haldwani, District Nainital. 3. Jai Prakash Joshi s/o Sri B.D.Joshi, R/o A-26 Judge Farm, Haldwani, District Nainital ……. Respondents …….. Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Pradeep Haradia, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Pradeep Haradia, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the first information report and the case registered against them has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 05.06.2006 05.06.2006 A