IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13442 of 2011 Pankaj Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 08.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and name of this petitioner surfaced in course of investigation in confessional statement of co-accused Sintu Singh who is none else than full brother of FIR named accused Rinku Singh. The above stated accused Sintu Singh stated that it was the petitioner who took the deceased and committed his murder. On the basis of confessional statement of aforesaid Sintu Singh, dead body of the deceased was recovered. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been implicated in this case at the instance of FIR named accused Rinku Singh and Sanjiv Kumar Singh and, as a matter of fact, petitioner does not have any grudge against the deceased. Although in course of investigation statement of one witness, namely, Ramanand Yadav, who happens to be owner of a Dhaba was recorded but this witness nowhere states that he had seen petitioner taking away the deceased. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Pankaj Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in Rupouli P.S. Case no. 11/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)