SSK/ 1 WP/6510.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6510 OF 2011 Mr. Balkrishna Shivaji Rokade ....Petitioner Versus M/s. Prakash Keshav Deole & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Pradeep Samant i/b. M/s. Pradeep Samant & Asso., Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for respondent nos. 2 & 3. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard Mr. Samant, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bhosale, learned AGP for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2. The petition pertains to recording of the mutation entry. The name of the petitioner was recorded in the rights of the suit property by Mutation Entry 9354. This mutation entry was cancelled by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Haveli, Pune and the matter was remanded back to the Tahsildar. The order of the Sub-Divisional Officer was subsequently confirmed by the Additional Collector and Additional Commissioner in an appeal and revision respectively, and therefore, the present writ petition. SSK/ 2 WP/6510.11 3. The only grievance of the petitioner is that in pursuance of the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, the Tahsildar has not issued any notice for fresh hearing. In these circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the petition, in my opinion, can be disposed of by passing the following order : 1. The Tahsildar-Haveli shall comply with the decision dated 11th April, 2005 of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pune Sub-Division, Pune in RTS/APP/73/2005. 2. The Tashildar shall decide the dispute between the parties after giving an opportunity of hearing to both the sides as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 3. The Tahsildar shall decide the issue in question independently on its own merit. In the light of the above order, the writ petition is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)