THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1593 of 2003 JUDGMENT: The petitioners herein filed M.C.No.21 of 2001, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Warangal, for grant of maintenance to them from the first respondent herein. In the said M.C., they also filed Crl.M.P.No.58 of 2001 praying to award interim maintenance of Rs.1,000/- each to them, pending disposal of the said M.C. The said M.P. was allowed on 13.08.2002. Subsequently, they also filed Crl.M.P.No.145 of 2002 under Section 125 (3) read with 128 Cr.P.C. praying the Court to order to arrest the first respondent herein and send him to civil prison, complaining that he has not complied with the said order, dated 13.08.2002. The said Crl.M.P. was dismissed by the Court below vide docket order dated 08.07.2003 and the said order reads as under: “Vide docket order dated 12.12.2002. As per Ex.P-12 in C.C.No.236 of 1998, dated 13.11.2002, a sum of Rs.80,000/- was deposited in the name of petitioner and it is admitted that it was renewed for three years from 31.3.2001 and it will mature on 31.3.2004. Hence, this petition is dismissed. No costs.” The said order is questioned in this Criminal Revision Case. As the amount was deposited on 31.03.2001 for a period of three years, it must have got matured on 31.03.2004. Hence, in my considered view, this Criminal Revision Case must have become infructuous and as such, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA 30th September 2010 dr