FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2438 OF 2008 ( SHRI.BHAGWAN PANDURANG PATIL V/S.SHANKARRAO LAXMAN TAMBDE & ORS) ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or Court's or Judge's directions and Registrar's orders orders ___________________________________________________________ Mr.Sameer S.Tambekar,adv.for petitioner. Mr.Datta H.Pawar,adv.for respondent no.1. Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP for State. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 20TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. This petition in essence is for challenging issuance of process against the applicant in Criminal Case No.1103 of 2006. It is an admitted position that on the date of the filing of the present petition, the evidence in the trial had been concluded and the matter is kept for judgment before the trial court. In that circumstance, the present petition could not have been filed. The same is accordingly disposed off. 3. Mr.Tambekar, learned counsel for the petitioner, then submits that the petitioner may atleast be permitted to submit his arguments in the trial court and necessary directions to the trial court be given. It appears that the petitioner has been taking adjournments before the trial court on the ground of the pendency of the present petition. He has also refused to advance arguments for the same reason. Thus this is a self inflicted situation. Therefore, no directions are being given. However, he is at liberty to make an application to the trial court for the purpose. If such application is filed, the trial court shall consider the same on its own merits. [JUDGE]