Criminal Misc.-M No. 20352 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 20352 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.9.2011 Boota Singh and another .. Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J. S. Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were recorded: “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the complainant had agreed to sell some portion of land to the father of the petitioners. However, on the refusal to get the sale deed registered a civil suit was filed, which was decreed in favour of the father of the petitioners. Possession of the land in fact had been delivered to the father of the petitioners when the agreement to sell was executed. The FIR has been lodged with totally false allegations. Only the offence under Section 452 IPC alleging trespass in the house of the complainant is non-bailable. Other offences alleged in the FIR are minor. Petitioner No. 2 is working as an Officiating Principal in a private school and is not involved in the agricultural work in routine.” Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in terms of the order passed by this court on 8.7.2011, the petitioners have already joined investigation. Criminal Misc.-M No. 20352 of 2011 [2] Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Head Constable-Tarsem Singh submitted that the petitioners have joined investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required. Considering the aforesaid facts, the interim bail granted to the petitioners on 8.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 28.9.2011 mk