V“ 29 ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1077 of 2007 Pe‘ri'rioner' : Manoj Vuidhya Versus Respondan'i’s Sfa‘re of Chha‘l’i’isgarh & afifier‘s Single Bencia: Hora’ble Mr. Jus+ice Sa'l'ish K. Agnihoi’ri. Mr. Kumnr'esh Tiwar‘i, Advomfe for The pei‘ifioner. 5min Anju Ahuja, Depu'fy Gsver'nmen'i’ Advoca‘fe for The Sfa'te/respondenfs. o R D E R (Passed on mis 26w bay af February, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for- +he pa‘i’i'i’ierier submi'fs iha'f ‘fhe pe‘i’i'fimer is working as Assisfan? Teacher/Leci'urer‘,,The pe‘fifioner obfained B. Ed. Examina‘fion cer'l’ifica‘fe on 14-7-1992, on his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel appearing for fhe nefi'i'ioner submi'fs Thu‘i' 'fhe quesfion involved, herein «sic whefher fhe ieacher, who obfained B. Ed. Examinalion Cer‘i‘ificafe on his own expenses is en'l’i'l'led To fwo advance incremen'l’s. 3. According ‘i’o learned counsel for 'i’he pefii’ioner, n12 pefi'l'ioner is en'fi'fled 1'0 ‘i’wo advance incremenfs in view of fhe decision of fhis Cour-r in rhe case of Voshwan‘l' Kui'nan Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporai'ion, burg and anofher {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour? in ’l‘he case of ‘fashwan’f Kurnar Bhoradwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora‘l’ion, Burg and ano‘lher (Supra), came so 'fhe conclusion i’ha‘l’ ‘I'he Teachers, who had obfained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examinafion Cer'lificafe on Their own 2 expenses, are covered by The circuiar‘ da‘i’ed 24.12.98 issued by The S‘i'a‘i'e éavernmen'i' of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for The peTiTioner furTher submiTs ThaT The facts and quesTion of law involved in The presenT cnae are squarely covered by decision of This CourT in The case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. hlunicipal Carper-chow, Dung and anoTher (Supra), To which learned counsel appearing for The respondenTs fairly concedes and agrees wiTh The avermenT made by learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioner. Accordingly, The wriT peTiTion is allowed in Terms of The order passed in The case of Yashwarrf Kurnar Bharodwoj Vs. Municipal €orpora'i'ion, Dung and anoTher (Supra), subjecT To verificaTion of The facT as To wheTher The peTiTioner has acquired B. Ed. ExaminaTion €erTificaTe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and furTher wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremen'rs or noT. No order as To cosTs. l Sdl- J lSatish K.Agnihetri s Judge Subhosh ‘