• c^ ZT^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)NO. <<U^Kf /2011 ^T PETITIONER '}-^ '^v'^-*o"'y.^i'" ^ o-' ^; ~'.^\.-'-"''i..•••'' ../s%^ yy'^-^y' .4.. .cf' ..-e^'"' ' '> '.. .' yy" RESPONDENTS Sunder Lal Patre S/o Late Mayaram, aged about 56 years, occupation Service, posted as Assistant Block Education Officer, Pandariya, District Kabirdham C.G. VERSUS 1.'' State of C.G. through the Secretary School Education Departanent , DKS Bhawan Raipur, C.G. 2. The District Education Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. 3. The Joint Director Treasury and Pension, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. .WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ^'^ MAYTHIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, The humble petitioner named above most respectfully showed: 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS. As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS. As mentioned in the cause tifle. 3. PARTICULARS_OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS BEING MADE: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETmON (S) No. 2056 of2011 Sunder Lal Patre. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofC.G. & Others. WRIT PE1THON UNDER AR1ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satisfa K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Sl-m Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/respondents. ORDER CORAL) (Passed oa 18th day of April, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks pennission of fhis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the liglit of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2) issued bv the Govemment of Chhattisearh, School Education Department. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. No pemiission oftliis Court is required to make representation to the respondent aufhorities. Thus, such direction camiot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered aiid decided in aceordance with law, on its owa merits aiid perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Ainit