CRM No.M-32636 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-32636 of 2010 Date of Decision:09.11.2010 Mangu Singh and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Sherry K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) What is not disputed here is that the Additional Sessions Judge, while entertaining the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, passed the following order on 09.09.2010:- “Notice issued to respondent directed to join the served. The applicants are directed to join the proceedings before the learned Trial Court and would move an application for regular bail, which shall be decided within 3 days from the date of filing on the same. In the meantime, they would not be arrested till 17.09.2010. Let record of the Lower Court be summoned for 17.09.2010. Notice to respondent be also issued for that date.” The concession of anticipatory bail was declined by the Additional Sessions Judge, mainly on the ground that sufficient time was granted, but it has been disclosed that the accused has not moved any application for bail before the trial Court vide impugned order dated 17.09.2010(Annexure P-2). Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, having gone through the record with his valuable help, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioners will appear/surrender before the trial Court within a week from today. If they surrender/appear in pursuance of the order of this CRM No.M-32636 of 2010 2 Court, the trial Court would admit them on bail on their furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds to its satisfaction. November 09, 2010 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) seema JUDGE