v NIMdl *HI* 's^'^ww^, w^\ww, \siv>wy. . C^M. ^- 5"1?T)®^ ifW----•••••••----"--•-••--^1200 an^?r wv (1pf^p5?T) an^?[ ?ff (<•)(+ ^TSTT 3T(^?T sn+iict) ?^iiwofCT sii^r PETITIONER J.D. Food Private Limited. R^ Cc D; Bi lersus- RESPONDENT c:,ilni Ni Di Sectibn (Petition under for restoration 482 oftheCr.P.C. 1973 |af Criminal Revision) 12-12-2007 Heard Shri Kishore Bhaduri petitioner. | By Ihis petition under Section (for short "the Cr.P.C."), the petitioht revision, which was dismissed for non| Learned counse! for the Detitioher 2007 tiie petitioner had comolied witl the complainant in ihe form of affida'l 2097 aaain on the same deiauit and S| defauit within seven davs. Since th^ way back on 10-8-2007, there was no| ehl*ltCT<4ll +11+1Cll' '^\FS<<I <f^l^.l< ^aifimsiii^T gistered a,"d Inoorporated A Company under Indian |impanies Act through its Director, Manish |luja, aged about 29 years, son of Late Shri ^ijit Singh Saluja, C-7, Sirgitti Industriai Area, |aspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). Kumar Nathani. son of Shri Govind ithani, aged about 40 years, Proprieior, rga Tradere, Subhash Chowk, Kharsiya, igarh, District Raigarh (CG). SinaieSench : Hon'bleBhri Justice Dhirendra IVlishra & Shri Ambuj Agrawal, counsel for the 482 of the Code of ihe Criminal Procedure ler has praved for resloralion of criminal •compliance ofthe order dated 3-9-2007. submits thal vide aDplication dated 10-8- 1 the defauit and had filed the statement of fit. However, the matter was listed on 3-9- ^e petitioner was aranted tlme to remove {he oetitioner has alreadv removed the default auestion of removina the default aqain. XI-HC— 3:cer '^iww^, vi-^ww, ^\<ftwy. ^Wvt\ *KI<* •V^ 200 3II^?T 'f^K C^SyKy) M^'I ?H Wi<h ^^TT STT^T sh+iiqft & Having heard learned counsel \ record. The Additional Registrar (Judic] Sanjeev Sahu, counsel Tor the petiticj copv of Ihe comolaint and CODV of sl Ir.P.C. Office was dirscted to frace 2007 it was reported by Ihe Sectiorj Sections 200 & 202 of the Cr.P.C. wj before the Additional Reaistrar (Judicl that dav, Shri Sanieev Sahu apDearecj of the statement under Sections 200 granted and it was directed that in c^ Court Tor orders on default. Accordin^ 3-9-2007 for orders on.default. On th^ Since the matter was listed for order^ its note dated 13-8-2007, the applfcan| period of one week, fai'.ing which 1 reference 1o Ihe Bench. AccordinBlv,] non-comoliance of the DreerriDtort' ordl In view of seauence of the assigned by the petitioner for restorirl bonafide and sufficient. In the rssult, ihe petition is li] dismissed. Consequentty, I.A.No.1/2007 <:ftl<ll^l4lTt ^WV^^^^ ^f^ff. ^affiiT sii^i br Ihe petitioner, 1 have perused the original (al) note dated 10-8-2007 mentions that Shri Iner, apoears and submits that he has fsted latement under Sections 200 & 202 of the i|)ut and proceed further. However, on 13-8- Officer that copy of the statement under bs not fiied and the matter was a.aain listed |al) on 17-8-2007 for'ordera on defau!t. On and prayed for one week's time to fiie copy pi 202 of the Cr.P.C. Accordingly, time was jse of failure the matter be Sisted before Ihe jly, the matter was listed before this Court on said dale, none aDpeared for the aoolicant. on default as poinled out by the office vide was directed to remove the defauit within a Ihe revision was to be dismissed without Ithe matter was dismissed on 24-9-2007 for fer dated 3-S-2Q07. iDroceedinfls detailed above. ihe reasons |g the eriminal revision do not appear lo be ab!e to be dismissed and it is accordingiy sDands disoosed of. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ^d^lE,