IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20364 of 2010 DHANANJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The defence of the petitioner husband in a Police case under Sections 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act is of custody since 12.4.2010 with no serious and heinous allegation. Vehemently opposing the prayer Counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner has breached the conditions subject to which he was granted anticipatory bail and therefore he does not deserve regular bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Masaurhi, Patna in Kadirganj PS Case No. 34 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)