THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.23228 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the subject property situated at Bandlaguda, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad, having purchased the same under a registered sale deed and that her name was also mutated in the municipal records. She states that on an earlier occasion, when the municipal authorities tried to interfere with her possession in respect of the said property, she claims to have filed W.P.No.23676 of 2007 and obtained interim orders, which are still subsisting. In spite of that, when the municipal authorities tried to interfere with her possession, she filed a suit in O.S.No.689 of 2008 on the file of the learned III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for declaration and perpetual injunction and the same is pending adjudication. While so, the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the respondents-police officials, at the instance of the persons, who are inimical to her, taking advantage of the litigation pending between her and the municipal authorities, are trying to interfere with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same, without any justifiable reason. Hence, she filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions in this regard. The second respondent, namely, Station House Officer, P.S.Bahadurpura, Hyderabad filed a counter in the matter denying the allegations made by the petitioner. It is stated that on a complaint given by the Deputy Executive Engineer, Circle-II, GHMC stating that some people by claiming ownership of the land at Housing Board Colony, Bahadurpura, damaged the property belonging to GHMC, a case in Crime No.240 of 2007 under Sections 447, 427, 506 IPC and Section 3A of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 was registered against unknown accused and investigation is taken up. Except that, it is categorically stated that the second respondent has not interfered with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property nor called her to the police station, as alleged by her. In view of the stand taken by the second respondent in his counter, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. In the circumstances, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:19.07.2010 VGB