Civil Revision No. 6812 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6812 of 2008 Date of decision : 16.3.2010 Hari Om ....Petitioner Versus Chandi Ram ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the respondent S. D. ANAND, J. In view of the consensual position that a plea for additional evidence filed by the petitioner-tenant herein remained undisposed of at the hands of the learned Appellate Authority, the matter is remanded to the learned Appellate Authority/District Judge, Hisar for disposal afresh. If the Presiding Officer, who decided the matter earlier, is no longer posted there, it will be open to the learned District Judge/Appellate Authority to either retain the appeal on his own Board or to assign it to any other Appellate Authority/Additional District Judge. The exercise shall be concluded in toto within fifteen days of from the date on which the matter comes to be listed before the Appellate Authority. If the additional evidence plea comes to be negatived, there would be no difficulty in complying with the time- bound order. However, if the plea aforementioned comes to be allowed, it will be open to the learned Appellate Authority to request Civil Revision No. 6812 of 2008 -2- **** for the grant of appropriate extension. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Hisar on 30.3.2010. March 16, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE