HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33855 of 2011 Date: 26.12.2011 Between: Aster Tele Services Private Limited, Secunderabad, Reptd by its Director- A.Srinivasa Prasad ..... Petitioner And: The Government of A.P., Reptd by Its Principal Secretary, Industries Department, Hyderabad and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A.Rajendra Babu Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Sri P.Roy Reddy Standing Counsel for APIIC The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantial relief: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not granting building permission in respect of Plot No.130, admeasuring 2845 square meters situated at I.D.A. Mallapur allotted in favour of the petitioner by executing regular sale deed as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the terms of allotment and to issue a consequential direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to transfer the property in Plot No.130, admeasuring 2845 square meters situated at I.D.A. Mallapur, by executing a registered sale deed and sanction the building permission by receiving the necessary charges.” At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the common order, dated 29.10.2011, in W.P.Nos.3524 and 3540 of 2010 and 4003 of 2011. Sri P.Roy Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, on written instructions, submitted that after the revised layout, the plot in question does not fall within the green belt area. He has also made available a copy of letter vide Lr.No.ZM/MLI/MLP/2011-12, dated 24.12.2011, addressed to the General Manager (LAW), APHC, HO, Hyderabad, which is taken on record. He, accordingly, fairly conceded that the common order, 29.10.2011, in W.P.Nos.3524 and 3540 of 2010 and 4003 of 2011, covers this case in favour of the petitioner. For the above-mentioned reasons, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of common order, 29.10.2011, in W.P.Nos.3524 and 3540 of 2010 and 4003 of 2011. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.42096 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 26th December 2011 DR