IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.761 of 2009 MALTI DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 27.06.2011 Whether one or the other caste was dominant in the area to be eligible for appointment as Aganwari Sewika is primarily a question fact which cannot be adjudicated in a writ petition. Likewise, whether respondent no. 10 belonged to one cast or the other is again a question of fact. The petitioner has an adequate remedy before the District Magistrate questioning the appointment of respondent no. 10. If any such application is filed within 30 days from today, let the District Magistrate consider the same after hearing all concerned including respondent no. 10, dispose off the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It shall be open for the petitioner to raise further questions of facts and law, as she may be advised. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)