IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO.M 4688 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION 21.4.2009 Rahila ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana. ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate Mr. Rattan Brar, AAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner is a female. She apprehends arrest in a case registered at the instance of Irfana alleging that she was attacked by Zuber and others, including the petitioner. The petitioner is alleged to have given a soti blow on the stomach of the complainant. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the police record. The incident in the present case is of dated 30.1.2008 whereas the FIR was registered after a gap of about two months i.e on 19.3.2008. Learned State counsel has not been able to show from the police file any medical evidence regarding the miscarriage or termination of pregnancy of the complainant. Co-accused of the petitioner have already been granted the concession of pre-arrest bail vide order dated 13.8.2008. The petitioner having joined the investigation, she can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, she will be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that she will appear before the investigating officer as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation at any stage. The petitioner will be required to furnish fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the court of competent jurisdiction in case the challan is presented against her. April 21 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE