IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 25580 of 2007 Between: Sagar Praja Realtors rep.by its Managing Partner,Motupalli Venkata Rao, R/o.MIG10,APIIC Colony, Opp.Bhavani Castings,Kakinada ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Visakhapatnam Urban Developement Authority, Rep.by its Vice Chairman,Siripuram Vizag 2 Vellanki G.P, Rep.by Village Secretary, Anandapuram(M), Visakhapatnam Dist 3 Chinnam Ramakotaiah, S/o.C.Subba Rao, Hindu, R/o.H-68,Madhuranagar,Hyderabad-38 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents 1&2 in not taking any action for removal of the compound wall and gate erected by the 3rd respondent contrary to the approved layout in L.P.No.27/06 by acting on the petitioners representation dt.22-10-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice for a consequential order to direct the respondents 1&2 to take necessary steps to remove the compound wall and gate erected by the 3rd respondent and enable the petitioner to have access to their approved layout land in L.P.No.43/2007, and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MRS.V.PREETI REDDY The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. The writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in initiating steps for removal of the compound wall and gate erected by the third respondent in transgression of the approved lay out in L.P.NO. 27 of 2006 and in not responding to the petitioner’s representation dated 22-10-2007 in this regard. Today Smt. Preethi Reddi, the learned standing counsel for the first respondent has placed before this Court a fax message received from the said respondent wherein it is recorded that the first respondent has complied with its statutory obligation of demolishing the compound walls and removal of gates set up by the persons who have developed the lay out in L.P.No. 27 of 2006 and which are causing obstruction to the approach roads in relation to the approved lay out L.P.No. 43 of 2006 in survey No269/1 and 2, Vellanki village, Anandapuram mandal, Vishakapatnam. In view of the above, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. It is accordingly dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 29-02-2008 Pvks/*