THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.1604, 2090 and 3928 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: These three criminal petitions arise out of same C.C.filed by different accused, they are being heard and disposed of by this common order. 2. Criminal Petition No.1604 of 2009 is filed by accused Nos.5 to 7, Criminal Petition No.2090 of 2009 is filed by accused Nos.2 and 3, whereas, Criminal Petition No.3928 of 2009 is filed by accused No.4 in the same crime. 3. These three criminal petitions are filed by the petitioners - accused Nos.2 to 7 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.14 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional Munsif Magistrate, Ongole, Prakasam District, arising out of Crime No.316 of 2007 of Ongole I Town P.S., Prakasam District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 498-A, 494, 506, 509 read with 34 of IPC and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The de facto complainant is a medical doctor and she married A-1, thereafter, it is alleged that A-4, who is also a doctor married A-1, the husband of the de facto complainant with active connivance of the other accused and there is continuous harassment of the complainant by all the accused. 6. The C.C. is already numbered. Considering the circumstances of the case, it is not at all fit case to quash the proceedings against any of the petitioners – accused. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners reports that there is likelihood of compromise in the matter and a proposal has already come up, but the learned counsel for the respondent-complainant disputed the same. However, in case there is any compromise, the same can be done at the trial Court level also. 8. Considering these circumstances, these criminal petitions are dismissed. _____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated: 29-10-2009 Rns