^^ms^ \. - © '^ / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICITIRE AT JABALP13R : M.P.. W.P.No. ^"(i 7 /1996. BETITIONSR s Shri Hem Singh son o£ Shri Dukalu Kx-PerBtanent Labour, BSCL Bhilai P.No. 4541, Resident of Village sirsa Potft Jewra Tah&il and Dlstrict,Dux« (K.P.). ^ RESPONDENTS_ sl» ^ 2< Tbe Group General Nanager, Hindustan Steel Works Consitn«Ltd«, (A Qovt.oS India Undertateing) & a Company incorporated under Indian Coapanles Aet with its registered Offlce at Calciafeta & %*anch Qfftc®at Bhilai, Tah. & I>lstt,Durg, Industrial l^ibunal, Raipur (M.P.). i 5, labow Court» OURG. mn i®TmcNUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 CF THB COISTITUTION OF INDIA. i__.__.__._. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT-BILASEUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETSTION N0.799 OF 19S8 Petitioner Respondents versus Shri Hem Singh The Group General Manager, Hindustan Steel Works Constn. Ltd.and others Presen? : None appears for the petitioner. Mr. H.B.Agrawai, Sensor Advocate with Ms, Sangeeta iVllshra, counsel for respondent No.1 . b^..;' sth (Passed on 8"' Day of December, 2006) The matter was cailed for hearing frwlce. On both the occasions, none appeared nor any representatlon was made on behaif of the petitioner. 2. in the circumstance, the writ petition is dismlssed for want of prosecutlon. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Gopai