1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 96 of 2011 Avika v. Asst. PF Commr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.L. Khapre, Adv for petitioner Mr A. Parihar, AGP for respdt Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 24th February 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent. 2. Petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent to decide the representation of petitioner dated 9.12.2009 made under Section 7-A of the Provident Fund Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the provisions of PF Act are not applicable to the activities carried out by the petitioner Company. Be that as it may, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent has submitted that the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law and procedure including the issue of applicability of provisions of the PF Act in respect of the activity carried out by the petitioner Company within a period of three months by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. In view of the statement made on behalf of the 2 respondent, grievance of the petitioner no more survives. Hence, petition stands disposed of by keeping all the issues open. JUDGE JUDGE joshi