IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10663 of 2011 AMBIKA RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, petitioner is named in the FIR, but as per prosecution case itself, it was co-accused Santosh Ram who went to the house of the informant and requested to visit his house as his father was ill and thereafter, on the very next day, the victim left his home and subsequently, he was seen in the house of petitioner and other accused. It is also admitted case of the prosecution that when informant inquired from the villagers, she came to know that the victim had already left the house of the petitioner and other accused. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ambika Ram be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, District-West Champaran in connection with Thakraha (Bhitaha) P.S. Case No.53 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)