IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 24653 of 1995 Between: Ch.Venkata Charyulu s/o. Venkata varada charyulu Shantapur Village Palakurthy Mandal Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The M.R.O., Palakurthy Mandal, Warangal District. 2 The M.R. Inspector, O/o.M.R.O. Palakurthy Mandal Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the high court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction declaring that the respondents have no jurisdiction to grant house site pattas in respect of or to other wise interfere with the possession of the mango garden admeasuring Ac.3-02 guntas of Shantapur Village, Palakurthy Mandal of Warangal District and to restrain them from proceedings further in respect of the said land. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.V.DHANAMJAYA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard both the sides. The main grievance of the petitioner is only against the apprehended action on the part of the respondents in trying to interdict with his possession of Mango Garden to an extent of Ac.3.02 guntas situated in Shathapur Village, West Godavari District. Several contentions have been urged including the fact that the petitioner has already surrendered substantive portion in the Mango Garden and the remaining portion is in his possession, the respondents are trying to interfere with the same. Hence, the writ petition. Initially at the stage of admission, this Court has granted interim direction not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and also not to issue or grant house site in favour of third parties as per the orders in W.P.M.P.No.30352 of 1995, dated 02.11.1995 and the said order is still subsisting. Having regard to the same, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no further orders are necessary. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed in terms thereof. __________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J 17th February 2005. Chvn. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER. To 1 The M.R.O. Palakurthy Mandal Warangal District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Inspector O/O.M.R.O. Palakurthy Mandal Warangal District. 3 Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 Two C.D. copies.