IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 10802 of 1989 Date of decision : December 17, 2008 Ram Gopal, dead, through L.Rs ...... Petitioner through Mr.Namit Gautam, Advocate for Mr.Salil Bali, Advocate v. State of Haryana and another, ...... Respondents through Mr.Deepak Jindal, AAG Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr.A.S.Tewatia, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny the assertion of learned counsel for the respondents that all benefits, due to the petitioner, since deceased, have been released to his L.Rs. It may be noticed that learned counsel for the petitioner was given time on 30.10.2008 and then on 3.12.2008 to verify the above fact. In the circumstances, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, liberty is granted to the L.Rs of the deceased-petitioner to revive this petition in case it transpires that full dues have not been paid to them. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 17 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'