IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 2950 of 2008. Decided on: 24.08.2010. _____________________________________________________ Bias Dev. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondents No.4 to 7. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition to enable his client to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance. 2. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to the competent 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - authority within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter the same shall be decided by the Principal Secretary (Irrigation & Public Health), Shimla by a speaking/reasoned order, within a period of ten weeks after the receipt of certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 24, 2010. (sck).