IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 LA.App..No. 417 of 2010(D) -------------------------- LAR.43/2008 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT 1 IN LAR --------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS 1-2 & 2ND RESPONDENT IN LAR ---------------------------------------------------- 1. D.SADASIVAN ASARI, TC 81/2297, ASHA MANDIRAM, KORALAMKUZHI, KULATHOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. N.ASHA DEVI, TC 81/2297, ASHA MANDIRAM, KORALAMKUZHI, KULATHOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TECHNOPARK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.A.AHAMED, SC, TECHNOPARK FOR R3 SRI.THOUFEEK AHAMED FOR R3 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- LAA. No. 417 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Invoking Rule 51(2) of the High Court Rules it is declared that R1 has been duly served. The LAA need not be treated as defective. 2. The Government is in appeal. The appeal pertains to acquisition of land in Attipra Village for the purpose of Technology Park at Kazhakoottam in Thiruvanamthapuram District. The acquisition was pursuant to section 4(1) notification published on 17-12-2003. We notice the judgment of this Court in LAA. 1332 of 2008 and connected matters. For the reasons stated in that judgment the impugned judgment is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly we set aside the impugned judgment and decree and remand LAR. No. 43 of 2008 to the Second Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The learned -2- Sub Judge is directed to permit both sides to adduce further evidence if they are desirous of. The learned Judge will pass revised judgment on the basis of the evidence already on record and the evidence which comes to be adduced by the parties further. While taking fresh decision the learned Judge will have due regard to the observations of this Court in its judgment dated 8-4-2009 in LAA. No. 1332 of 2008 and connected cases. Either the Government or the requisitioning authority will make available the learned Judge a copy of the above judgment. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) ksv/-