IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7688 OF 2008 Between: G. Shiva Kumar Goud. ..... PETITIONER. AND The State of A.P., Rep. By its Station House Officer, Banjara Hills, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ..... RESPONDENT. Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.345 of 2007, on the file of Banjara Hills Police station, Hyderabad. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. N. SHOBA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the sole respondent, the Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7688 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard Sri K. Srinivas, learned counsel representing Smt N. Shoba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A. Ramesh, learned counsel, representing the learned Public prosecutor for the sole respondent. Crime No.345 of 2007 on the file of Banjara Hills police station under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code was registered against the petitioner herein and another. Sri K. Srinivas, learned counsel reported that, Sri G.N. Mastan Rao, the other accused in the Crime is no more. Irrespective of the same, Sri A. Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public prosecutor reported on instructions, that the investigation into the Crime has been completed and the statutory investigating agency has found that there is no evidence to establish any criminal liability and that the dispute is civil in nature. The learned counsel stated that the police are accordingly filing their final report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Under the above circumstances, there appears no need for passing any orders in Crime No.345 of 2007 and if at all any proceedings arise in future out of that crime against the petitioner, it will be always open to the petitioner to pursue all appropriate remedies against such proceedings, in accordance with law and there is no need to continue present Criminal petition which has practically become infructuous and unnecessary. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as unnecessary. ____________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date:02-09-2009. Dsh.