BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13694 of 2011 PONGAL PUNITHA ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.17/2010 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.THIRUVADIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused in crime No.17 of 2010, for offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471 and 474 IPC. Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, she is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner was formerly the Principal of AUPET Chinmaya Vidyalaya Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Palayamkottai during the period between 2004 and 2009. She resigned her job in the year 2009. Thereafter, when the accounts were produced, it came to light that the petitioner has not accounted for the money spent for the School. On these allegations, the present case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has accounted the money for every monthly transaction of the School and the transactions are borne out by records. 4. In my considered opinion, since the petitioner was a Principal of AUPET Chinamay Vidyalaya Matriculation Higher School about five years, Prior to 2009. Whereas, the present complaint has been preferred only recently and going by the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that all the transactions are borne out by records and the records are with the Management, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Tirunelveli, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 13/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1 TIRUNELVELI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. A.THIRUVADIKUMAR Advocate SR.No.35561 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13694 of 2011 Date :13/10/2011 SMA/14.10.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/