IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 3452 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.J.PANDYA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- AJAYSINH HARISINH CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BJ JADEJA for Petitioner MR MA BUKHARI APP for Respondent No. 1 MR BC DAVE for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.J.PANDYA Date of decision: 10/10/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT The request of transfer need not be considered in view of the fact that the situation can be taken care of by directing the trial court to grant permanent exemption to the petitioner from appearing save and except where his presence is required in court. This would be the position when either his plea to be recorded or when his further statement is required to be recorded as he being the accused. Otherwise, the appearance of his advocate shall be accepted as his appearance and the matter shall be proceded in accordance with law. In view of this direction, nothing further requires to be done in the matter. Rule is made absolute to that extent only. Interim relief is vacated.