IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35420 of 2009 1. ARJUN BIND, S/O LATE SARYUG BIND, VILL-DASHRATHI, P.S.-DHARHARA, DIST- MUNGER. 2. MANTI DEVI, W/O ARJUN BIND, VILL-DASHRATHI, P.S.-DHARHARA, DIST- MUNGER. 3. BITTU KUMAR @ BILTU KUMAR, S/O ARJUN BIND, VILL-DASHRATHI, P.S.- DHARHARA, DIST-MUNGER. 4. RAJESH KUMAR, S/O ARJUN BIND, VILL-DASHRATHI, P.S.-DHARHARA, DIST- MUNGER.........................................................................................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR....................................................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 02. 26.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 498(A), 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation for demand of dowry is omnibus in nature and the marriage has taken place about six years ago. In view of the aforesaid submission, the petitioners, namely, Arjun Bind, Manti Devi, Bittu Kumar @ Biltu Kumar and Rajesh Kumar are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Complaint Case No. 228C of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)