IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 131 of 2008(S) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16635/2003 Dated 09/08/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS : PETITIONERS: ----------------------------- 1. THE COMMANDING OFFICER, INS DRONACHARYA, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI. 2. THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF, HEADQUARTERS, SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND, KOCHI-4. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SMT.K.GIRIJA RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. C.A.FERMAS, SALESMAN, (NOW UNDER TERMINATION), UNIT CANTEEN, INS DRONACHARYA, FORT KOCHI, RESIDING AT CHALIYACHAN VEEDU, ST.JOHN PATTOM, FORT KOCHI. 2. THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR. BY ADV.MR.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. ----------------------------------------- R.P.NO.131/2008 IN W.P.(C) NO.16635 OF 2003-S ----------------------------------------- Dated 24th June, 2008. ORDER Balakrishnan Nair, J. The writ petitioners are the petitioners herein. They have filed this Review Petition as if it is a first appeal against our judgment. Going by the grounds raised, we find that they are grounds available for raising in an appeal and not in a Review Petition. Further, we have given liberty to the writ petitioners to proceed against the 1st respondent, if so advised, in accordance with law also. Therefore, we find no reason to entertain this Review Petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. Nm/