IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.318 OF 2009 In the matter of the Companies Act 1 of 1956); AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of CONCURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED With CONCURRENT (INDIA) INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED CONCURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Shop No 3, Delight Society, Plot No 81, Gorai –II, Borivili West, Mumbai -400092. ) ) ) ) ) …Applicant Company. Called for Summons for Direction Coram: S. J. Vazifdar, J Date: 13th March, 2009 Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., for the Applicant MINUTES OF THE ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company above named by a Summons for Directions AND UPON HEARING M/s. Rajesh Shah 1 instructed by Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 26th day of February, 2009 of Mr. K. Sudhir Babu, the Director of the Applicant Company, in support of the Summons for Directions IT IS ORDERED:- 1. That the convening and holding of the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company to consider and approve the proposed Arrangement embodied in the Scheme of Amalgamation of CONCURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, “the Applicant / Transferor Company” with CONCURRENT (INDIA) INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, the Transferee Company is dispensed with in view of the consent given by all the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company as on date, which are annexed as Exhibit “B-1” to “B-7” to the affidavit in support of the Summons for Direction. 2. There are no Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as mentioned in paragraph 15 of the Affidavit in support of Summons for Directions, hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Secured Creditors does not arise. COMPANY JUDGE 2