IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMP(M) No. 443 of 2010 and LPA No. 63 of 2010. Date of decision: 31.8.2010. Dr. Sunil Dhand ….. Appellants. Vs. Dr. Y.S.Parmar University of Horticulture & Forestry & ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellants : Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) ` CMP(M) No. 443 of 2010 & LPA No. 63 of 2010. This is an application for condonation of delay of 315 days. The application is seriously opposed. According to the petitioner, the delay has occurred owing to the mistake on the part of his Clerk and on account of inconvenience to the petitioner to go out to Shimla to prepare the appeal. We do not find any supporting affidavit of the Clerk to substantiate the contention. Be that as it may. It is seen that the appeal is against the order dated 13.7.2009 in OMP No. 151 of 2009 in Civil Suit No. 72 of 2008 where the petitioner- appellant has prayed for staying the trial of the suit in view of pendency of another suit claiming very same relief. If that is the only grievance, it is for the petitioner to take steps for joint trial of the suits and move an application Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? - 2 - in that regard so that court may examine the matter in that regard. In that view of the matter also, we do not find any ground to allow the petition and to pursue this appeal 2. Subject to the observations made above, this application for condonation of delay is dismissed and consequently the LPA No. 63 of 2010 also stands dismissed. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 31, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh), ( Hem/) Judge.