IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND COND COND APPEAL No. 506 OF 2006 APPEAL No. 506 OF 2006 APPEAL No. 506 OF 2006 Smt. Hirabai K. Jagtap ... Appellant Vs. Govind D. Jagtap & Ors. ...Respondent Mr. P. N. Joshi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. S. M. Sabroad, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 27, 2006. : JUNE 27, 2006. : JUNE 27, 2006. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. Both the trial Court as well as lower Appellate Court, have given concurrent findings that the suit is clearly barred by limitation. There is no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]