4i ttl^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUX W.P.No3S^~^QF 2003, PETITIONER .»*• ^ Nammi Singh, S/o Shri Chhedu Singh, Aged about 47 years, Ex-Constable No. 124, Government Railway Police, Raipur, (C.G.) and R/o Village- Pharaswani, Tahsil & Police Station Dabhra, District Janjgeer-Champa, (C.G.). V E R 8 US State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). The Superintemdent of Police Government Railway Police, Raipur, (C.G.). Gyan Singh, Head Constable No.316, Government Railway Police, G.R.P. Police StationRaigarh, (C.G.). / ' / /^\'^S^RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2'26/227 OF THE ^ ° CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS XI-HC-22 3rn^i'^r ?<-}J<=h~ 3T[t^T ^RW^TI "^Sf ^WM^, '^IWTS, I^TRiy J^^.^/03 N^IT' WWtl ^rRI^ sn^r ^m^R ^rfN 6.2.2004 Petitbner by Shri Rake|sh Mohand Paadey, AdvoGate. State by Shri Praveen I|)as, Panel lawyer, The petitioaer has p^efeired this writ petition under Artiele 226/227 of the Constiti^tioii of India cha&nging fhe order dt 22.2.1994 (Annexurc P/l compulsorify, At the relevaa^ RaUway PoUce, Raipur. The on 2.12.1993 whifc he was viblated the code ofcoaduct; beaten fhe head coxistable ^Begation against the petitioner were timt |on duty ^fe consumed liqiior fheareby he oh1^T<riJftFi ^TR^f 41^^ 'tf^5TC ^ 3?f^R 3?1^T ) whereby the petittona- txas been retircd time fhie petitfoner was working $A Govt |at fhat tune he also quaireled, abused and jaad fhercby violated tfae police conduct Rules and was rcsponsible ^or msuboidmatiQn; and the third cha%e was that he had left the pla^e of duty thereby he was negl^eait to lub duly by leaving the place o|f duty. After enquiiy the petittoaer was compulsonly rctircd, Leanied counsel for fhe] i^tltioner submite Itiat fhe petitioner may be allowed to make a rcpres^ntation to tibe Respondent No,2 axid the Respondeut No,2 may be dirjected to decide tihe rcprcsei&tation of tbe petitioner in. an objective macjner, to which l^inied Paxiel lawyer has aio objectbn. r XI-HC-22 3TR^?'^T fS[^'3T(^r '^wN? -^lia ^^-^ T5? '^qrar^r, 's'^ftwTS, M<yii^y 3TT^T t^RF OD.9.t^'^s^3/^ •^ 200 ^ WH^TI %^HI^ •N^r arr^T ^^iw TT^cT Having tieard learaed coiiijtsel fa the facts and circumstances oli make a detsdled reprcsentation of 10 days fbom today and ia tu|ni rcpresentation ftted by the petiti^ner in an objective manner by pasjsing consideration aU the poiats raisejd Wifh fhe above observatidns Consequentty I.A. No. 10152/20(p3 EJtsel for fhe parties aad having regani to fhe case the petitioaer is aUowed to ^o the Respondent No.2 witlua a period the Respondent No.2 wiU decide tfae wifhia a ftuther period of 30 days aii appiopriate order takmg into by thc petitioner. lliis petition is disposed of finalfy. ^taads idisposdt o^ f '5RPlfeFrft?f T?pq^ff ^ fec^ <r^^« ^3^R37T^T Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge i» [^^fe^ ^^^-^f <y