1 293.10-ao-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 293 OF 2010 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 296 OF 2010 ABC Chemicals Private Limited. ... Appellant. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay. ... Respondent. Anil Singh for the appellant. Ms.K.K.Soran for the respondent. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 29th September 2011. P.C. : This Court on 26th July 2011 passed following order: “1 The learned counsel for the appellant states that the Corporation had taken a policy decision of regularizing the Mezzanine floor constructed prior to 15th August 1997. The construction of the appellant is before that. He stated that the appellant has applied for regularizing the mezzanine floor on 7th May 2008 which the Corporation has not yet decided. The learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation states that she would check and report to the Court within a period of two weeks. List the matter after two weeks. Interim order to continue till then. 2. The counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation has presented compilation of documents which reveals that the proposal 2 293.10-ao-- tendered by the appellant seeking regularization of the mezzanine floor on 7th May 2008 has already been decided and the same has been turned down for the reason that certain necessary documents which were essential for deciding the proposal for regularization were not tendered by the appellant. Appellant, now, seeks liberty to tender necessary documents so as to enable the Corporation to consider his request for regularization of construction of mezzanine floor. Counsel for the respondent- Corporation, on instruction, states that if necessary documents are tendered by the appellant within a period of four weeks from today, the proposal for regularization will be reconsidered and necessary decision will be rendered within six weeks thereafter. 3. The interim order passed by this Court shall remain operative till disposal of proposal for regularization by the competent authority and for two weeks thereafter, in the event decision is adverse to the appellants, so as to enable the appellants to take recourse to the appellate remedy. 4. In view of the undertaking given by the appellant to produce the necessary documents within four weeks from today and in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent- Corporation that the proposal for regularization will be reconsidered within six weeks thereafter, instant appeals for order stand disposed of. In view disposal of appeals from order, pending civil applications do not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)