C.W.P. No. 12346 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 12346 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 01.11.2011 Puneet Vashisht and others .....Petitioners Versus Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Mr. G.S. Kaura, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manohar Lall, Addl. AG Punjab. Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 5. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). The petitioners who have purchased the plots from MGH Colonizer and Builders Pvt. Ltd.-respondent No. 4, herein, have filed the instant petition for issuing direction to respondent No. 1 to provide facilities to them in terms of the agreement and the conditions of licence granted. In view of the order dated 14.10.2011 passed in CWP No. 19291 of 2011 titled Veena Kumari and another Vs. State of Punjab and others, such writ petition is not maintainable. However, notice of motion was issued and in response to that learned counsel for respondent No. 4 C.W.P. No. 12346 of 2011 2 stated at bar that sewerage facility was already available to premises of the petitioners and the electricity connection as well as water connection has now been provided to them. In view of these facts, the major relief has already been granted to the petitioners. If the petitioners' still has any grouse regarding maintenance, open space and public parking, then they have alternative remedy to approach the Civil Court to enforce their rights as per the agreement/contract. In view of this, the present writ petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 01.11.2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) reema JUDGE