IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39991 of 2010 SATISH SINGH @ SATISH KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 25.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only non-bailable offence is abuse in name of informant’s caste. Exhibits 2,3 and 4 are in corroboration of the F.I.R. for differences in between the parties on the point of appointment of second round selection of school teacher. There may be more fault on behalf of informant as illegality committed on her behalf was complained to the authorities and under direction of A.D.M. Bhojpur, F.I.R. was lodged one day earlier to this case and now parties have resolved their differences by filing compromise, favours the petitioner for bail but in regular side only as anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. 2 However, petitioner is directed to surrender in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in Sahar P.S. Case No. 64/10 and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on the observation made above without being prejudiced by this rejection order. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)