IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 20 OF 2007 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 68 OF 2007 MODERN EDUCATIONAL TRUST THROUGH TRUSTEES ... Applicant Versus MR. ALVARO JOAO REGO AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. M.s. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent no.3. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE, J. Date:- 20th September, 2007 P.C. Heard the Advocate for the applicant and respondent no.3. Other respondents are absent though served. It is sought to be contended that observations made in my Order dated 02.08.2007, may come in the way while deciding the main application for grant of interim relief which is pending. I have made it clear in my Order that the trial Court will decide the TI application in its own merits. Even if mandatory injunctions are sought, the same may be granted by the Court if a case for grant of mandatory relief is made out at the interim stage. It is not a fit case to interfere. Hence, application is rejected. R. S. MOHITE, J. arp/*