IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1640 of 2007 GOUR CHANDRA GHOSH, S/O LATE RAM CHANDRA GHOSH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- ANADILAL MISHRA LANE, BARI KHANJARPUR, P.O. BARI KHANJNARPUR, P.S. BARARI, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. ........PETITIONER Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA, THOUGH ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITYY BAORD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY RAOD, PATNA. 4. THE JOINT SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 5. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER I, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 6. THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUTNS, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 7. THE GENERAL MANGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTIRC SUPPLY AREA BAORD, BHAGALPUR. 8. THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTIRC SUPPLY CIRCLE, BAHGALPUR. 9. THE ELECRTIRCAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, URBAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, BHAGALPUR. ................. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 09.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent Board. No Counter Affidavit has been filed in this case. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the pendency of this writ application the petitioner has received the payment of the retiral dues. However, the payments were made after a delay and as such the petitioner is entitled to payment of statutory interest on account of such delayed payment. - 2 - The petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3. Considering the above submissions, the petitioner is permitted to file representation before the respondent no. 3 within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case, such representation is filed the respondent no. 3 shall consider the same and dispose of by a reasoned order in accordance with law considering the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation. On consideration, in case such representation is disposed of in favour of petitioner respondent no. 3 shall simultaneously issue necessary orders with regard to the payment of admissible claim as raised in his representation in the light of the order passed by him on the representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. S.Sb/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)