G^1^-2?7_ $- ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No.P>^^ /2010 PETITIONER: ^^ ^y v\ ^ .^y- .^' ^'^.^ ^' .h^' y Ramcharan Sahu S/o Narayan Prasad Sahu aged about 56 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle school, Kansda Block-Nawagarh Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPQNDENTS: ^^•^^.^, ./^* -'»»A ^l. State of Chhattisgarh Through: - Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) ^3. Block Education Officer Block Nawagarh District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon*ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.3343^2010 Ramcharan Sahu Versus State of Chhaffisgarh and others \coNsrruTiON OF INDIA Present: - Shri Ashwani ShuMa, counsel for the petftionen. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th Juty, 2010) The petitioner was initialty appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After completion of their probation period, he was granted reguter pay scate of Rs.169-300/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scate with effect from the date of initial appotntment or after comptetion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by tfie Madh^i Pradesh Stete Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Ottsers v. State ofM.P. & otfeers), wherein jt was hetel that the simjlarly sifaiated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to tfie Hon'bte SujN'eme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunat to ttie effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scato from the date of initial appointment ..^'T'^. //se%~ \ ? ?J slS^ v9 4. Learned counsel appearing for the p^ifioner further submits that this Court, white considering the same issue in Amar Sal Ram Si Offters v. State of Chhattfsgarff & Othws, W.P.(S).No.4725^006, by order dated 01-09-2006. altowed the petftioners to make a representation wtthin a period of ten days, raising all the grievances. 5. Accordingly. the petMioner is granted liberty to make a representetion raising all grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and the circutar dated 13-01-2009 (Annexure P-2) and in tum, the concerned respondent »sdirected to decide the representation, if any. m accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representafion, subject to verificatton of the facts. 6. In view offlie foregoing, this petition is disposed ef. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Tumane