IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 33996 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- E.V.M.FUELS (P)LTD, REGISTERED OFFICE, CC.NO.31/696 ABC, HONDA BUILDING, SA. ROAD, ERNAKULAM. REP. BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, E.M.PAUL, S/o. MATHAI. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------ GURUVAYOOR MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, GURUVAYOOR. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.33996/2008 2 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED TO SIDHARTHAN. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY REGARDING THE EXTENSION BUILDING PERMIT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).No.12437/08 DATED 2.07.2008. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE MAHAZAR PREPARED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 30.08.08. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 02.09.08 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 02.10.08. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE S.SIRI JAGAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C)No. 33996 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner claims to be the owner of 19 cents of land within the Guruvayoor Municipal area. He purchased the same along with an unfinished building, for construction of which the vendor had obtained a building permit from the Municipality. The petitioner sought extension of the validity of the period of the permit, which the petitioner states that was refused and petitioner filed W.P.(C) No. 12438/08, in which this court directed the petitioner to complete the construction in accordance with Ext.P1 permit. On 22.8.2008 the officers of the Municipality came to the petitioner's premises and pointed out certain violations in the construction of the building. Pursuant to the same, Ext.P5 notice had been issued to the petitioner, whereby the petitioner has been directed to stop further construction. The petitioner submits that although the petitioner has filed Ext.P7 reply to the same no orders have been passed pursuant thereto. The petitioner now confines his relief for a direction to the 1st respondent to pass final orders pursuant to Ext.P6, after considering Ext.P7 objections of the petitioner. 2. I have heard the standing counsel appearing for the Municipality also. W.P(C)No. 33996 of 2008 - 2 - In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent Municipality to pass final orders pursuant to Ext.P6 after taking into account Ext.P7 objections also and affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs