IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1021 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28.02.2008 in W.P.NO.4085 OF 2008 on the ﬁle of the High Court.) Between: Smt.Shahzadi Begum W/o.late Shaik Mohammed, R/o.H.No.20-5-289, Qazipura, Shah Ali Banda, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND 1 Smt.Yousufunnisa W/o.Mazhar Ahmed @ Khursheed R/o.H.No.20-5-290, Qazipura, Shah Ali Banda, Hyderabad. 2 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 3 Assistant City Planner, Circle-II, Sardar Mahal, Charminar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.MOHD.AZEEMUDDIN FAROOQUI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI The Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1021 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal. The appellant, who is the third respondent in the Writ Petition, ﬁled this appeal aggrieved by the order dated 28.02.2008 in W.P.No.4085 of 2008 ﬁled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the inaction of respondents 2 and 3 in not granting permission to the ﬁrst respondent to raise construction in respect of a portion of her house bearing M.C.No.205-290 situated at Qazipura, Shahalibanda, Hyderabad. After considering the submissions made across the bar, the learned Single Judge observed that the request of the ﬁrst respondent is wholly innocuous and directed respondents 2 and 3 to consider and dispose of the application, if any, ﬁled by the ﬁrst respondent and till the disposal of such application, granted status quo to be maintained with regard to the existing structure. Hence, the appeal. Having heard on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, we refrain to go into the ﬁnding given by the learned Single Judge and it would suﬃce in the interest of justice to direct the authorities concerned to consider all the objections raised by the appellant including all the violations in respect of construction and also the pendency or otherwise eﬀect of the proceedings in the Civil Court between the parties and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Subject to the above, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J) 9th September 2008 RRB