1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5456 OF 2009 Shahu Corner Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadeet .. Petitioner. Vs. Nandkumar Siddhnath Jadhav & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.P.D.Dalvi for the petitioner. Mr.Pratap Patil for respondent nos.1 to 3. Coram : D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this writ petition the petitioner has impugned the following order: “Read application and say. Heard. After careful perusal of the entire proceedings in the light of submissions advanced by the concerned Ld.Advocate, I am of the view to direct the both the parties to advance their arguments on application for framing preliminary issue. Also the Opp.1 is directed to argue on application for framing preliminary issue on Exh.5 on next date.” 3. Mr.Dalvi, learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the impugned order submits that the learned Judge intends to hear the petitioner’s application and application at Exhibit-5 together. 2 I have perused the order. This court is not expected to explain the orders passed by the courts below. Hence without expressing any opinion this writ petition is dismissed. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)