IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 8305 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.12.2010 State of Punjab and others .... Petitioners Versus Joginder Lal and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Satish Bhanot, Addl. A.G. Punjab for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Mr. Satish Bhanot, Addl. A.G. Punjab fairly stated that after the impugned order, defendants witnesses have already been examined. In view of this, I do not find reason to permit the plaintiffs to lead evidence after the evidence of the defendants. Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners-plaintiffs to agitate before the Appellate Court by invoking Section 105 CPC that evidence of the plaintiffs was wrongly closed. (ALOK SINGH) 21.12.2010 JUDGE reena