IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No. 13 of 2007 Date of decision: 8.12.2011 Hardev Chand, Son of Sh. Munshi Ram, R/o Village Kangar Sub Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. …Appellant/Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh Through Director Consolidation of Holdings H.P. exercising powers of State of Govt. U/S 54 of the H.P. Holdings Consolidation and Fragmentation SDA Complex Kasumpati, Shimla-9 H.P. 2. Consolidation Officer, Hamirpur, Distt. Hamirpur, H.P. 3(i) Smt. Parkasho Devi, widow 3(ii) Sh. Pawan Kumar, son 3(iii) Sh. Jaspal Singh, son 3(iv) Smt. Sandesh Kumari, daughter R/o Village Kangar, Sub Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. 4. Kashmiri Lal, son of Sh. Babu Ram, R/o village Kangar Sub Tehsil Haroli, Distt. Una, H.P. ….Respondents. Letters Patent Appeal under Chapter 10 of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders against the judgment dated 4.5.2007 in CWP 765/2000 decided by Hon’ble Single Judge, whereby the CWP has been dismissed. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 . For the Appellant: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Addl. AG with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, dy. AG for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 for LRs of respondent No.3 and for respondent No.4. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4th May, 2007, passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby he dismissed the writ petition on the ground that while exercising writ jurisdiction, this Court will not interfere in the agreed order of the parties. 2. The grievance of the appellant is that the order though passed on the basis of some settlement arrived at between the parties does not reflect the correct settlement. This matter obviously cannot be gone into in the writ petition and the only remedy available to the appellant would be to approach the authority where the settlement was arrived at for review/modification of the order. Therefore, the present appeal is allowed to the limited extent that the appellant shall be at liberty to approach the authority now exercising the powers of the State Government under Section 54 of the H.P. Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1971. In case such an application is filed within 60 days, the appellant shall be entitled to 3 ask for excluding the period already spent in the writ petition and in this appeal. No costs. Dasti copy. (Deepak Gupta) Judge. December 8, 2011 (V.K. Ahuja) (vt) Judge.