AB 3461/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. N. Uddin, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the respondent State. The learned Addl. P.P. has submitted the connected C.D. I have perused the same. This application u/s. 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking pre-arrest bail in res pect of the husband petitioner. Similar prayer was earlier rejected vide order dated 21.09.2011 after perusing the C.D. in A.B. No. 2225/2011. There is no new facts and circumstance requiring re-consideration of the matter. In view of the above, I do not find it to be a fit case to grant the prayer for pre-arrest bail. Hence, the prayer for pre-arrest bail stands rejected. The bail application is accordingly dismissed.