IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2856 OF 2005 Farooq Mohd. Yusuf Sheikh ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra through the Supdt. District Prison, Akola & ors. ...Respondents. .... None for Appellant. Mrs.A. S. Pai, APP for the Respondents. CORAM:- J. N. PATEL AND SMT.R. S. DALVI, JJ. DATE :- 25TH AUGUST, 2006 P. C. The office note shows that the notice was sent to the Petitioner as well as his Advocate. None is present. We have examined the petition and the affidavit in reply. The Petitioner seeks furlough in the matter, which has been rejected by the Competent Authority. We find that in the affidavit in reply, the Competent Authority has spelt out the reason for denying the Furlough to the Petitioner by referring to the observations made by the trial Court in ..2.. which reasons have been stated for not releasing the Petitioner on Furlough. In this view of the matter, we do not want to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Competent Authority. Petition is dismissed. (J. N. PATEL, J.) (SMT. R. S. DALVI, J.)