RSA No. 2704 of 2005 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2704 of 2005 Date of Decision: 11.9.2009 Parmeshwari Devi (dead) through LRs. ......Appellant Versus Krishan (dead) through LRs. .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the appellant. Shri Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby plaintiff's suit challenging the decree dated 26.11.1984, was dismissed. It was found that earlier the plaintiff filed two suits challenging the decree suffered by her father. Such were filed during the lifetime of her father, but the same were withdrawn. In the said suit, father of the plaintiff not only filed written statement, but also appeared as a witness and stood by the decree suffered. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or RSA No. 2704 of 2005 (2) material irregularity in the finding record, which may give rise to any substantial question of law in the present second appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 11.9.2009 ds