IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.146 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 11.09.2006 M.L.Kansal ....Petitioner through Mr.Vikram Aggarwal, Advocate vs. Anil Razdaan ....Respondent through Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT *** SURYA KANT, J. The petitioner filed C.W.P.No.8967 of 2005 wherein a direction was sought for the release of travelling allowance on account of medical treatment of his wife. The writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated July 16, 2005 with a direction to the Financial Commissioner to Government of Haryana, Irrigation Department to decide the representation which the petitioner had already made and/or the supplementary representation which the petitioner could make within a period of three weeks. The representation was directed to be decided, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months. Alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid order, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition. In response to the show cause notice, an affidavit dated 8.9.2006 of Mr.Anil Razdaan, Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Irrigation Department has been filed which is taken on record. Along with the said affidavit, a copy of the order C.O.C.P. No.146 of 2006 -2- dated 17.7.2006 (Annexure R-1) has been appended whereby the petitioner's claim for the release of travelling allowance has been considered and disposed of by passing a speaking order. A perusal of the order reveals that a part of the petitioner's claim has been accepted whereas the remaining part is turned down. Since the directions issued by this Court have been complied with by the respondent No.1, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the speaking order dated 17.7.2006 (Annexure R-1) to the extent it has turned down the petitioner's claim before an appropriate forum, if so advised. Rule discharged. September 11, 2006 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE