H!GH COURT OF JUD1CATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. W.P. N0.2061 OFZOOe. Lalit Seksaria Aged about 41 years S/o Late Shri B.K. Seksaria Minjng Contractor, cai, ct Vs. R/o Ganjpara, Durg Tahsii & Distric Durg (C.G.) 2. 3. Hon'bie Tribunal Ministry of Mines, Government of india, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi Through: Secretary iWinistry ofMines, Govt. of india, New Delhi. State of Chhattisgarh 'hrough Secretary Minerai Resourees Department Govt. ofChhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Shri Jitendra Chandrakar Aged about 33 years, S/o Noop Singh Chandrakar R/o Nandini Khundani, Tahsil Dhamda, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Mr. V.G. Tan-iaskar, learned counset for the petitioner. Mr. Utkarsh Verma, learned Dy. G.A. for the State. vSi The petitloner has preferred a re'/ision to the Governmsnt of tndia against the Order granting iease in favour of the 3 respondent herein. it appears that along with revision the petitioner has aiso made an appiication for interirn order. The revislon fiied by the petitioner is yet to be heard and disposed of. Slnce the Govt. of Indla has not passed any order in the jnterim application, the petitioner has approached this Court by s,vay of thjs writ petltion. Since the petitioner has resorted to ths ^ -<*-- statutory remedies by preferring the revision before Govt. of India, there is no good reason for me to step-ln under ArSicie 226, at this stage. It is hoped that Govt. of India, if there is any detay to dispose of the maln petitlon, wouid consider th® interiocutory application filed by the petitloner for interim relief, on priority basis. WISh the above observation, writ petltion is disposed of. No costs. _____---—- ChiefJustice .-;* ^^