IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2011 / 1ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25192 of 2011(Y) --------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- MOLLY ANTONY, AGED 56, W/O.ANTONY, ATTIPPETTI HOUSE, PUTHUVAIPU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682508. BY ADVS. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN SRI.V.K.MEETHIANKUNJU SMT.BHAMA G. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682030. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHUVAIPU, PIN-682508. 4. THE SUB-REGISTRAR, NARAKKAL, PIN-682508. 5. THE GOSHREE ISLANDS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM-682011, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 TO R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 25192 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 30/5/2011 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 6/6/2011. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.C4/55417/2007 DATED 8/10/2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26/6/2009 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 28/9/2010 IN WPC.20524/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 25192 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the owner of 15 cents of land in R.Sy.No.35/6 of Puthuvaipu Village. According to the petitioner for the sale of the said property she entered into an agreement, a copy of which is Ext.P2. It is stated that when the petitioner contacted the 4th respondent for registering the sale deed, she has been informed that as per Ext.P3 the property has been frozen for acquisition and therefore sale deed cannot be registered. It is therefore this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to quash Ext.P3 and to direct the 4th respondent to register the document concerning her property on its presentation. 2. It is seen that the very same issue has been considered in Ext.P5 judgment where directions have been issued for registration of the document. Therefore the petitioner is entitled to the same reliefs particularly W.P.(C) No. 25192 OF 2011 :2 : because, even according to the learned Government Pleader, no steps for acquisition of the property has been initiated even now. In such circumstances the writ petition is disposed of directing that on the production of the sale deed concerning the property mentioned above, the same shall be registered by the 4th respondent without delay, if the document is otherwise valid in all respects. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-