K'.l .r~s° f' vys IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO.^?f<72Q06 PETITIONER -.•""1^.« ^^> '..>^ ^hy^ "??i^r :<>:-' /.^ '^' ^•~ RESPONDENT -fl^<^^ "' •:J .^ <'• c,\> ^^^ ^"Q^ Jagannath Verma./ S/o Late Shri Darabram Verma Ageabout41 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. Primary School, Khaparikala Block Tilda,Distt-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh ^ Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer < Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Tilda, Disstt.-Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W.GH COURT OFCHHATTCSe.ARH AT @-ASPUR W. P. fe) No. 4895 of 2006 Petitioner Jaganncth Verma Versus Respondents State Sovt. of Chhattis"arh A others SiRg!e Beneh; Hon'bte AAr. Justice Satish K. iAgnihotri. Shri A.jay Shrivastaya, Adyocate for the Petitioner. Smt. .4"ju A.huja, Dy. 6ovt. Adyocats for the r'e^ondents/Statc. OR&ER (7th &p1e!Tiber, 2006) 1. Learned counsel appenring for the petitioner submits that whi'e working as Ass'stant Teacher, the peti+ioner has gone on trasning +o improye his qualifications on his own expenses and c'cqulrsd B. Ed. Exa'Ttination Cer'tificate ort 27.3.96. 2. Accordmg to learnsd counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is enti+led to two ad'/aice incren'en+s in view of the decision of this Court in 1+ie case of Yadiwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunici'pa! Corporation, Durg csnd cnother {2006 (CT) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in •the case of yashwmt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, &urg a"d another (Supra), came to the conc!us'on that the teachers, who had ob-teined B. Ed. ..^-^' ExQmin'stion Certifica+e on his own expensss, are covered by •rtie circular" dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/l) issued by 'ths State (9oyer'!f!mssnt of Msidhya Prc'd^sh 3. Lsornsd coun^ei for ths Detitioiier'* 'fayi^&v ^jbmits 'H^ct thff fac+< *3Md ouestior* rtf !nw inyolys in the Dr^sent case ai*e squareh' coyered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunic'pa! Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which tearned counse! oppearing for- the respondents fairly concedes and agr-ees wi+h the averment made by tearned counse! appearing for the petitioner, subject to verification as to whe+her the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Ex(2tnincEtlon Csrtif*oat^ on hi^ own exos'ti<6S 01* not, 4. Accord'n^^y. +^s writ petitson is aHo'Af'sc! jn ter'ms of 'ff1^ ordsr posssd 'm the case of Yashwi"i+ C-umar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipat Corpom+jon, Durg and another (Supra). No or-der cs to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Babtu