1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.440 OF 2005 Mohammed Kamar Abdul Ansari .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Q.M.Ashfaq i/b Smt.Rashmi Mishra for the applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh A.P.P. for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 7th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 7th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 7th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is the second application for bail. The earlier application for bail of the applicant was rejected by reasoned order dated 23rd June, 2005. No change of circumstances is brought on record to consider this application except the fact that about a year has elapsed after rejection of the earlier application. In my opinion, that by itself cannot be treated as a change of circumstance. Hence this application is rejected. At this stage the learned counsel for the applicant prays for liberty to the applicant to prepare a paper book and apply for early date of hearing. Liberty as prayed for is granted. It is open for the applicant to apply for early date of hearing after filing of the paper book. This application is disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)