IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.21551 of 2009 Between: Ramakanth Inani and two others … Petitioners And Madhukar R.Bhangay and two others … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU WRIT PETITION No.21551 of 2009 ORDER: - (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioners already availed the appellate remedy in R.A.No.3 of 2009 and in which he obtained necessary interim order. It is well settled that when a statutory appeal or revision is pending before a Statutory Authority, the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the very same relief cannot be entertained. Since the petitioners already availed the remedy of appeal, unless the appeal is decided against them, the present writ petition cannot be entertained. In view of the same, we are of the view that the writ petition is devoid of merits and the same cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed granting liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternative remedies available to them. No order as to costs. ___________________ (A.GOPAL REDDY, J) _________________________________ (SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J) 01.12.2009. Lmv