1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.18 OF 2005 Hanmantrao Tatyasaheb Deshmukh .. Petitioner v/s. Shri Sambhaji Maruti Patil and another .. Respondents Mr.I.M.Khairadi for the petitioner. Mr.S.G.Deshmukh with Mr.R.D.Suryavanshi for the respondent No.1. Ms.P.H. Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM : R.M.LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL , JJ . DATED : 24TH JULY, 2006. P.C. The respondent No.1 Shri Sambhaji Maruti Patil is an advocate practicing in the courts at Ulhasnagar. By passage of time, wisdom seems to have dawned in him. He handed in an affidavit affirmed today in substitution of his earlier affidavit dated 5.2.2006. 2. Paragraph 2 of the affidavit reads thus- “2. I am sorry for the words I used in my Memo of Criminal Revision Application No.63 of 2 2002 submitted on 1.9.2002 in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge at Kalyan. I withdraw those words in the memo of revision application and I tender my sincere and unconditional apologies to this Hon'ble Court for having used those words in the said Revision. My apologies may kindly be accepted.” 3. We accept the apology of the contemnor since it is an unconditional apology. Contempt notice is discharged. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)