AB 2040/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K MERUNO Heard Ms. R Rangmai, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. BS Sinha, lear ned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners five in numbers have moved this pre-arrest bail application appr ehending arrest in connection with Udharbond P.S. Case No.47 of 2011 under se ction 147/149/326/379/342/427 of the IPC. The petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are per manent workers of the Pathemara Tea estate and the petitioner No.4 is the social worker and the petitioner No.5 is a student of class-IX and is a minor. The pol ice station case have been registered on the basis of an FIR filed by one Tonton Nunia whose son was assaulted and who sustained injuries which is of grievous i n nature and the mobile phone was snatched away and also some money from his poc ket. The son had to be hospitalised and had to undergo treatment in the Silchar Medical College & Hospital. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the case diary produced by the learned Addl.P.P. and a lso considering the injury report pertaining to the said son of the complainant and investigation conducted by the Investigating Agency, this Court is of the co nsidered view that there are prima-facie evidence to show deep involvement of the petitioners in the alleged case and therefore the petitioners are not entitl ed to be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Hence, this bail application stands rejected.