1 wp409.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 409 of 2011 Dadu Sadhu Ranavare ..Petitioner v/s. Prakash Dhondi Ranvare & ors. ..Respondents Miss P.M. Bhansali i/b. K.A. Chothani for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Patil for the respondents. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 22 2011. P.C. The Petitioner challenges the order dated 2nd December, 2010 vide which the Application filed by the present Petitioner for amendment of the plaint came to be rejected. The order impugned is a purely interlocutory order. In any case, in the event, the Judgment and decree of the learned trial Court is adverse to the interest of the Petitioner, the Petitioner can very well challenge the order impugned herein in the Appeal, that he may require to file in view of provisions of Order 43 Rule 1A of CPC. 2 wp409.11.sxw 2. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the present Petition under extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)