IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2008 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17065 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SIVARAMA PILLAI, S/O.NARAYANA PILLAI, MANNOOR HOUSE, PAVUMPA SOUTH, PAVUMPA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM. 2. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, OACHIRA. 3. ALIKUNJU, KOLLANTEVADAKKETHIL, PAVUMBA, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVAKAIMAL, SC, BSNL FOR R2 GP. SRI.I.V. PRAMOD SRI. MATHEW K. PHILIP, SC FOR BSNL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 17065 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of June, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5 order, whereby the 2nd respondent was permitted to draw telephone lines across the petitioner's property, on the premise that there is a pathway through the petitioners property, the existence of which is in dispute in a suit filed by the petitioner. 2. The 2nd respondent has filed a statement in paragraph 7 of which is stated thus: “7. There is no free cable pair along the route. There is no proposal to lay underground cable along the route. Therefore the 2nd respondent can provide new phone connection only by WLL method. If the 3rd respondent is not agreeable to the same, his registration will be cancelled in accordance with the rules on the subject”. In view of the said statement that the 3rd respondent would be provided with wireless telephone connection, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Recording the above statement, this writ petition is closed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE bkn/-