IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 CRP.No. 288 of 2008() --------------------- OA.66/1985 of LAND TRIBUNAL, PARAPPANANGADI AA.187/2000 of A.A.(LR),THRISSUR REVN. PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1,3&4/RESPONDENTS 1,3&4: 1. JAFFAR SADDIQUE,S/O.HYDER MUHAMMED HAJI, PADKKAL MANKKOTH HOUSE, VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. JAMEELA,D/O.HYDER MUHAMMED HAJI, PADKKAL MANKKOTH HOUSE, VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. PATHUMMA,W/O.HYDER MUHAMMED HAJI, PADKKAL MANKKOTH HOUSE, VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENTS/SPPL.APPELLANTS 2& 4 TO 6 & 2ND RESPONDENT/L.R's OF Ist APPLICANT NO.2: 1. AYYAPPAN, S/O.CHATHANKUTTY, KUMMANTHODY HOUSE,VELIMUKKU AMSOM, VELIMUKKU P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. CHEERU, D/O.CHATHANKUTTY, KUMMANTHODY HOUSE,VELIMUKKU AMSOM, VELIMUKKU P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. KARIYATHA, S/O.CHATHANKUTTY, KUMMANTHODY HOUSE,VELIMUKKU AMSOM, VELIMUKKU P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. KALLI,D/O.CHATHANKUTTY, KUMMANTHODY HOUSE,VELIMUKKU AMSOM, VELIMUKKU P.O.,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. ABU SABHAH, S/O.HYDER MUHAMMED HAJI, (WRONGLY STATED IN THE ORDER AS ABDUL SAMAD). VELIMUKKU AMSOM,VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.R.P.No. 288 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of April, 2008. O R D E R This revision petition is preferred against the order in A.A.No.187/2000 of the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Thrissur. The said appeal was disposed of along with A.A.No.186/2000. A revision was preferred against the said order as C.R.P.No. 189/08. After considering the matter I set aside the order of the Appellate Authority and directed it to consider the appeal afresh in the light of the documentary evidence available before the court after hearing both sides. I also fixed a time limit for disposal. Since this case also arises out of a common order passed, the same has to be disposed of. Therefore I set aside the order under challenge and remand back the case to the appellate court for fresh consideration along with A.A.No.186/2000. The appellate authority is directed to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders on merits in the light of the entire documentary evidence before the court after hearing both sides. Time limit of three months is fixed after the date of receipt of this order. The appellate authority shall issue notice intimating the date of posting of the case. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE bkn/-