WPMS NO. 1045 of 2004 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The W.P. is dismissed as infructuous. Detail order passed on separate sheets. IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1045/2004 (MS) Dharamveer Singh and another ……..Petitioners. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others …..Respondents. Ms. Indu Sharma, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Jagdish Bist, Learned Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/respondent. Mr. Alok Merha, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 22nd June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhuila, J. The matter relates to no confidence motion against respondent No. 3. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.09.2004 passed by District Panchayat Raj Officer in pursuance to the directions given by the Hon’ble High Court of Uttarakhand, Nainital on 02.09.2004 in writ petition No. 828/2004, whereby the direction was issued to the District Panchayat Raj Officer to decide the proposal of the no confidence motion filed under Section 14 read with Rule 33. Now the counsel for the petitioner makes statement before this court that the new election is completed and the writ petition has now become infructuous inasmuch as new Pradhan of Gram Sabha has also been elected by new election. Therefore, there is no use for keeping the writ petition pending. Therefore the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.06.2009 Ravi