HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIELF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO W.A. No.877 of 2010 Dated 19-11-2010 Between: Mallugari Narsa Goud ……..Petitioners Vs. K.Anjaneyulu and others. ………Respondents HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIELF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO W.A. No.877 of 2010 JUDGMENT (Per HACJ): Appellant is the contesting respondent in the main writ petition filed by the 1st respondent herein. The 1st respondent obtained interim suspension by order dated 06-10-2010 in W.P.M.P.No.32275 of 2010 in WP.No.25257 of 2010. The same is challenged in this writ appeal. 2. Though the appellant sought time for filing counter affidavit in the said petition, without having filed the counter or any other appropriate application seeking vacation of the interim order dated 06- 10-2010, straight away approached this Court and filed the present writ appeal. Hence, prima facie, we are of the view that having regard to sufficient alternative and efficacious remedy available to the appellant, challenging the very same order, by filing appropriate application before the learned Single Judge, this Court cannot find favour with the appellant by interdicting the proceedings of the learned Single Judge, at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed with liberty to the appellant to file appropriate application before the learned Single Judge. No costs. _______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ Date: 19th November 2010 ____________________ V.SURI APPA RAO,J kvr