{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.506 OF 2010 Sheetal w/o Subhash Fulare Age-19 years, Occ-Household R/o Khultabad, Dist-Aurangabad APPLICANT VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. N.S.Ghanekar, Advocate for applicant Mr. B.J.Sonawane, APP for respondents State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 4th March 2010 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicant has prayed to release her on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest in connection with CR No.155/2009 registered with Khultabad police station. Interim protection is granted to the applicant on 16.02.2010. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned {2} APP. Perused the papers of investigation, carried out till today. 3. It appears that the said offence is registered on the complaint of one Kantabai Dhawale. The date of alleged incident is 27th October 2009, the time is at about 8.30 to 9.00 p.m. and the place is in front of the residential premises of the complainant. It is alleged that as there is civil dispute pending in respect of house property, the complainant was abused by the applicant and others in the name of her caste. Perusal of the complaint shows that the said abuses are given not by a single person but by number of persons and there are sweeping allegations against them. 4. My attention is drawn towards CR No.154/2009 registered with the same police station in respect of the incident occurred at about 8.30 to 9.00 p.m on 27.10.2009, by the husband of the present applicant. However, this incident is alleged to have taken place on a public road. It is alleged in CR No.154/2009 that when the complainant therein was proceeding on his motor bike, the complainant in CR No.155/2009 and her relatives accosted his motor bike and assaulted the husband of the present applicant. It is also stated in the complaint at CR No.154/2009 that threats were given by the complainant in CR No.155/2009 to the husband of the applicant that if any complaint is lodged in respect of assault then he and his family members would be implicated in a false case under the Atrocities Act. The husband of the applicant has specifically mentioned in the complaint lodged at CR No.154/2009 {3} that threats were extended by complainant Kantabai that he and his family members would be implicated in a false case under the Atrocities Act. Considering the complaint at CR No.154/2009 the possibility of false implication of the applicant cannot be ruled out and hence case is made out to exercise the discretion u/s 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 5. In the result, the application is allowed. Interim protection granted on 16.02.2010 is hereby confirmed and to remain in force till filing of the charge sheet. Applicant may apply for regular bail after filing of the charge sheet. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln506-10