IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30314 of 2011 Bitamin Yadav @ Nimochhiya Yadav, S/o Banarsi Yadav. Versus The State of Bihar ---------------- 03. 17.10.2011 Due to inadvertence in the order dated 15.09.2011 Babulal Yadav the petitioner’s bailor has been mentioned as his brother whereas it should have been cousin brother and inadvertently condition “B” has been mentioned despite the fact that the petitioner has criminal antecedents. In view of such, the order is modified to the extent that Babulal Yadav be read as cousin brother and condition “B” stands deleted. Let this order be communicated to the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Jamui through FAX at the cost of the petitioner in connection with S.Tr. No. 713/10 arising out of Sikandra P.S. Case No. 248/08. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)