IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13814 of 2009 SHANKAR CHAUDHARY @ LEDWA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.6.2009 Heard. The facts are detailed and the reasons have been assigned fully in my earlier order contained in annexure- 1 refusing the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Fresh ground is that Rakesh Kumar alias Bantha who named the petitioner and whose statement led to recovery of theft property has been admitted to b ail by a Bench of This Court in Cr.Misc. No. 11517 of 2009. I am not fascinated by the argument as most of the arguments touching upon the merits of the petition were dealt with by me in my earlier order. However, if the trial is not concluded by the end of August, 2009, the court below, i.e., Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, shall admit the petitioner to bail on his execution of a bond to its own satisfaction in Agam Kuan P.S.Case No. 43 of 2008. 2 With the aforesaid observation, this petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)