z/, q/ W IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA‘I'URE CPMATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR w.P No (5&7 /2002 PETITIONERS 3 1. Manohar Lal Khemani s/o Govardhan Hemani Aged about 35 years, R/o Tagore Nagar.Raipur Chhattisgarh Vasudev Hemni s/o Late Sri Hund Raj Hernani aged about 38 years; R/o Khctara Talabmaipur Chhattisgarh :VERSUS g RESPONDENTS: Raipur Development Authority a body incorporated under Section 38 of the Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam G E Road, Raipur istt. Raipurmhhattisgarh 2. The chairman, aipur Development Authority a ipur, chhattisgarh PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TI‘E CON$ITUTION O? INDIA Shri Ranbir Singh, C‘ Leanmd ccunscl £04 has been merged in Municipal Development Authority Corporation and as such the petition needs amendment. hearing, learned counsel for the On the last: date oi petitioners sought time. The matter is pcndir. .g since 2002. Even otheiwise, no useful purpose would be served in Keeping the matter pendir Lg. The petition is dis missed for non~prosecution with liberty to revive, in case c: ‘rovt.Advocate, for the State. 7 the State submits that Raipur mse of action survives. / Sdl- Fakhruddin A I 'lv: Judge x1-Hc—7s :§H:mqwmtenkmeynwmng tx/P 6%§% cyt’ Inizoo anewW (Wu) m Hfzam W weft n‘ feeim e afftm 31123! ‘27/6/2003 None for the petitioners.