IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25633 of 2010 ASHA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is Sautan of complainant. Allegation of theft is super-addition due to differences in between both of them. Petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail may not be refused for the offence under section 498A IPC, for next non-bailable offence while the complainant has resolved her differences by filing a compromise petition. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Indrajeet Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa in Complaint Case No. 1489 C of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)