N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU m PETITION (227) N0. a g 6312 0 Mahendra Dubey, / o.Vishwanath Dubsy, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Surajpur, P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) Satish Dubey, S/o Vishwanath ubey, Aged ahéut 30 years, /o. Surajpur, PS 85 ‘Tahsil, Surajpur, Dismct {Surguja (C.G , PETITIONERé DEFENDANTJS Li Ravishankar Dubey, S / o. Vishwanath Dubey, Aged abou 28 years, R/o. Surajpur, RS. 8 ahsil, Siirapur, District Surguja (C.G.). T j Rajesh Dubey, S/o. Vishwanath Dubey,’ Aged about 25 years, R/o. Surajpur, RS. 85 Tahsil, Surajpur, Distn‘ct Surguja, (C.G.) Radheshyam S/o Dwanka Ram Dubcy, Aged about 58 years R/o. Kodan, PS Bhalyathan, Tahsil Surajpur; Distiict Surguj (C.G.). Omkar Ram , [Dubey, S/Q. Dwan'ka Ram Dubey, Aged abou 52 years,VR/o. Surajpur, P.S. & Tahsil— Surajpur, District Surguj (C.G.). Vixendranath, S/o. Radheshyam Dabey, Aged about ‘26 years, R/o Kodan Tahsd Surajpur, Dlstnct Surguga (C G ) a I R wi 9 D R .) t 5 a t a .7 y Premratan Choubey, W/ o. Vishwanath Dubey, Aged about 53 years, R/o. Surajpur, Tahsil Surajpur,’ District Surguja (C.G.) JLaxmi Narayan Dubey, S/o. Vi$hWanath Dubey, Aged about 26 years, R/o. Surajpur, District surguja (C.G.) Mulyakanhin, Wd/ o: Tapeshwar, Aged about 80 years, R/o. Koilari, ’ Tamil Surajpur, Distn'ct Surguja (Cm. Devi, D/o. Tapeshwar Ram, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Koilari, Tahsil Surajpur, District surguja (C.G.). Chandrabhan Ram, S/o. Dadairam Dubey, Aged about 33 years, R/o. Koilali, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Chandradev, S/ o. Dadairam Dubey, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Koilari, Tahsil Surajpux, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS Ganga Devi, D/o. Late Ramkishun Dubey, W/o. Upendra Nath Dubey, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Krishnapur, P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur, pism‘ct Surguja um.) . State of Madhya Pradesh , (Now Chhattisgarh), RESPONDENTS MW PLAINTIFF , DEFENDANT J W Through the Collector, Surguja {c.G.). 10. WRIT ?ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ wf€.”)~°./%3 :200 mwfaia; mmm v $aifawm Kvr ‘sg. t Hwbne shri Justice N.K. Aga a 31-08—2009 Shri Ashok Kumar Shuk!a, co nsel for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Law er forthe State. Shri Shukla, learned counsel ppearing for the petitioners on instruction, seeks permission of thi Court to withdraw this petition With liberty to raise the point in cas the petitioners are required to file an appeal against the judgment nd decree that may be passed in Civil Suit No.12—A/1991. Liberty is granted, as prayed r. With the aforesaid iiberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order asto costs. ’ - Sui/— N.‘K.Agarwal Judge «maeummwvW imam: tia’ra WW: marria~FSI9s 1 t / zoos~1 .oo,ooc.