HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.934 OF 2010 DATE: 21.06.2010 Between: Sri Giduturi Bala Souri …….Petitioner And: Smt Guduturi Mariyamma and another ……Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.934 OF 2010 ORDER: Questioning order dated 17.03.2010 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam in M.P.No.44 of 2010 in O.P No. 792 of 2009 granting interim maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month to his mother, the petitioner seeks to file this revision petition. Admittedly the petitioner is drawing more than Rs.18,000/- per month towards his salary as Welder in Naval Dockyard, Visakhapatnam. The 1st respondent/mother is not residing with him. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the lower court having found no basis for the 1st respondent’s allegation about she giving Rs.75,000/- to him after death of her husband, should not have granted interim maintenance to her. With regard to entrustment of Rs.75,000/- by mother to the petitioner, it is a matter of proof to be let in by the mother during the course of enquiry of main O.P. Simply because she did not prove the said fact in this interim maintenance application which is heard in a summery fashion, this Court cannot make a comment on that allegation. It is contended by petitioner’s counsel that the petitioner is ready and willing to maintain his mother in case she joins him and that there are no grounds for her to reside separately and claim maintenance from the petitioner. Till her husband was alive, the 1st respondent did not make any claim for maintenance. Even during that time, the 1st respondent was residing separately along with her husband. According to the 1st respondent, after death of her husband, she joined the petitioner’s family and she was driven away by the petitioner. In those circumstances, the lower court granted small amount of Rs.2,000/- per month to her as interim maintenance even though her claim was Rs.3,000/- per month towards maintenance and Rs.30,000/- lump sum towards medical expenses. I do not find any irregularity or illegality or impropriety in the impugned order passed by the lower court. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. ___________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU,J. Date:21.06.2010. GK. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.934 OF 2010 Date:21.06.2010 Gk.