Lsp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 364 of 2000 Paritoshik Vitrak Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner V/s. Capital Foods Limited ...Respondents Vinayak Shete i/b. Ms. Poorvi Kamani for petitoner. None for respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st November, 2008 : 21st November, 2008 : 21st November, 2008 P.C. . Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that petitioners are not interested in pursuing this remedy as the claim amount has been received from the respondent company. Ordinarily, in petition which is admitted, the petitioner will be required to publish advertisement regarding proposed withdrawal. However, it is noticed that no publication has been done so far regarding admission of the petition. Besides, no notice under Rule-28 has been served on the respondent. Significantly, no other claim has been received in the office either to support or oppose this petition. There is no company petition pending against the respondent company praying for winding up of the respondent company. In the present petition the claim amount is 2 only the sum of Rs. 5,26,134/- which already has been settled. Taking over all view of the matter, therefore, the request for liberty to withdraw this petition is granted. 2. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]