IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16220 of 2008 Between: K.Venkatanarayana S/o. Jagannatha Chariar @ Venkatakrishnama Seetha Chariar, R/o. Eswaran Koli Street, Mel-Bhuvanagiri, Chidambaram Taluk, Tamilanadu, Rep. by his GPA, R.Ravindran, S/o. C.Rajalu, Aged: 43 years, R/o. No.23/32, Chinna Kaziyar Street, Chidambaram, Tamilanadu. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue(J.A.) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an apropriate writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of ' Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering and disposing of the representation dt. 27-3-2006 as wholly arbitrary, illegal, unjust, malaﬁde and violative of Article 300-A of th eConstitution of India and consequently the respondents be directed to dispose of the representation by holding that the petitioner's land as private land and to pass such other and further orders that may be deemed ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: The petitioner states that he made representation dated 27.03.2006 to the 1st respondent-Government requesting them to implement the orders dated 22.12.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Land Administration (Appeals), A.P., Hyderabad, which conﬁrmed the orders of the ASO in R.P. No. P3/1166/2002, dated 22.12.2005, and issue pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of the land in his possession, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Hence the writ petition. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner referred to above, was forwarded to the Secretary, Revenue Department, who in turn had called for a report from the Collector concerned, and now the matter is pending consideration before the Government. He, however, submits that instead of going into the merits of the case, the writ petition be disposed of directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 27.03.2006 made by the petitioner, for which course, the learned counsel for the petitioner also agreed. In view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The 1st respondent-Government, are directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 27-03-2006, said to have been made by him for implementation of the orders of the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (Appeals), A.P. Hyderabad, in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ N.V.RAMANA,J Dt:14-08-2008 Usd/ksr