IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9459 of 2010 NAMUN @ MD.MAMNUN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 22.4.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under sections 376, 452, 323, 504 of the Penal Code. The petitioner and the complainant are residents of same village. The elder brother of the petitioner prior to filing of this complaint petition, filed a Sanha bearing S.D.E.No.576 of 2008 on 27.11.2008 before the concerned Police station suspecting their implication in a false case by complainant’s family as his family were not agreeable to marriage of petitioner with the complainant. Further more an informatory petition as well as regular complaint was filed. Counsel for the State submits that in the complaint, it has been alleged that the petitioner committed rape on the prosecturix. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (S.P.Singh,J)