IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6135 of 2010. Decided on: September 29, 2010. Sarita Shah ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. …… Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr.Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Aggrieved by Annexure P-1, order of transfer, the petitioner has submitted Annexure P-2, representation before the respondent. It is seen that the post is still lying vacant. The main contention of the petitioner is that the transfer during the middle of the academic year affects the educational prospects of her children. The petitioner has submitted in the representation that in case she cannot be retained as such, at least, she may be allowed to continue till the end of the academic year. There appears to be some substance in the submission made by the petitioner. Therefore, we dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondent to consider Annexure P-2, adverting to the submissions made therein and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law and justice. Till orders are passed as above and communicated to the petitioner, the implementation of the transfer order will be deferred. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the Writ Petition before the respondent. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice September 29, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (karan) Judge. 2