IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 18TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 14653 of 2007(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. EDANAD DEVELOPMENT CHARITABLE SOCIETY NO.K.161/89, OMANA A.NAIR AGED 54, W/O. APPUKUTTAN NAIR P.N., PUTHANKANDATHIL HOUSE, KOTHALA P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. MANIKKUTTAN NAIR, AGED 55, S/O. R.NARAYANA PANICKER, COMMITTEE MEMBER, RESIDING AT PUTHANKANDATHIL HOUSE, KONTHALA P.O. KOTTAYAM. 3. ANITHA V.KAIMAL, AGED 45, RESIDING AT PUTHANKANDATHIL HOUSE, KOTHALA P.O., KOTTAYAM. 4. CHITHRALEKHA, AGED 40, COMMITTEE MEMBER, RESIDING AT PUTHANKANDATHIL HOUSE, KOTHALA P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAGHUNANDANA MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. 2. KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, PROJECT OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. 3. DEPUTY TAHASILDAR (R.R), KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL BY SRI. K.P. HARISH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.14653/2007 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF LETTER DTD. 28/10/2000. EXT.P2: COPY OF LETTER DTD. 23/03/04. EXT.P3: COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DTD. 7/04/2007. EXT.P4: COPY OF LETTER DTD. 28/04/2007. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.14653 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 7th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Though Exhibit P3 notice has been challenged in the writ petition, the writ petitioners have stated clearly in paragraph 5 of the writ petition that they are ready to settle the accounts with the 1st respondent. Apparently, taking note of this expression of willingness on their part, by order dated 8.5.2007, this Court had granted a stay for two months on condition that petitioner pays an amount of Rs.50,000/- within six weeks. The time was extended till 31.7.2007 by order dated 13.7.2007. 2. Learned standing counsel for the respondents Sri.K.P.Harish submits that no amount has been paid even as on date. In the circumstances, there is no warrant for showing any further indulgence in favour of the petitioners. At any rate, I do not find any reason to interfere in the writ petition. The same is accordingly, dismissed. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007