;..;3f<" 'w:'^:!^;SiS^^KS" ^^ss^. •^^-"' ,^y'! dr^l^^t &.-••" IN tiffi .fflGH COURT OF CEEHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^n PETITIQNER : Sf W.P. (s) No. ....':.^.&......../200^- ^.-Rajendra Kumar Dewaagan S/o Shri S. L. Dewangan aged about 40 years Post Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School Dongargaon, Block Dongargaon Distt. Rajnandgaon VERSUS RESPONDEN^S: 1: State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Education >p ^, ^ Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur ^C^^lo^' ^'^/ \^.'° 2; District Education Officer, Chhuria, y^ ^/ t.-* District Rajnandgaon(C.G.) <^L^-°''/ ^y '3: Block Education Officer Block- Chhuria District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WMTPETTriONU/A 226/JK^OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOROTHER SUITABLE WMTSAND DIRECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:- y SA HI6H COURT OF WHATTIS6AKH AX BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HQN'BLE MR. SATESH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Hemrai Kumbhkar State of Chhatti^arh and others WRIT PETTTION tS.) N0. 46S OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Siddharth Choure Sta-te of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETTTION fS 1 N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Panch Ram 5ahu State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petjtioner Respondents ywsuis Manharan Lol Prthauru State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTTPETmON (S.) N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner ResBondents versus Yaggaya Datta Boghel Stnte of Chhattisgarh nnd o-thers WRTT PETiriON fSI NQ.j46U2F2Q07 Petitioner ftespondents versus Shiki Khoperdcy S-tate of Chhattisgarh and o+hers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner : Katftiey Kishun Patel versus Respondents : State ofChhatt-isgarh ond olhers WRIT PETCTION (5.1 N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus AAangonLal State of Chhattisgarh and o+hers WRTT PETmON 15.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Dhal Sffigh Sonwwni State of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 473 OF 2QOZ Petitioner versus Respondents Onknr Lal Sonboir Stnte of Chharttisgarh ond olhers WRTT PETTTrON (S.) N0. 474 QF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Shiv Kumar Sharma State of Chhattisyrh nnd others WRTT PFTmON fS.l N0. 475 OF 2007 Petitioner : ftajendra Kumar Sagar versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and o-thers WRIT PETmON fS.) N0. 476 OF 2007 's^ (T.^ Petitioner Respondents vierais AAakhanlal Thakur State of Chhatt'isgarh and o'thers WRTT PETITI014 (S.VNO. 477 OF 2007 Petjtioner yersys Resoondents Fool Chand Kamleshwar State of Chhcrttisgarh ond olhers VffiITJ»EmiONtS.) N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus fajendra Kuniar Oewangan State of Chhattisgarh and others And WRTT PETTnON (S.l N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner : Juyont Kumar Shendey versus tespondents : S'tate of Chhattisgarh and otiiers Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitreners. Mr. Sudiil Dubey, ©ovemment Adwcate for the State/respondents. ORDER (passed on 24th Oey of Jtinuary, 2007) 1. Learned counsel eppearing for -the petitioners as well ns leomed fiovemment Advocate oppearhig for the Stnte/respondents jointly submit that -the facts and question of taw involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered bythe decision of this Court m the cnse of yashwwit Kumfw Bhwwdiw^ vs. Munle^wl CwpomHwi, [>wy eavd anortuv^. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSapesti Kumar Vsnnan. Tfu Stats Govt. af Chhatlisgarh <md anaithw) ond o-ther connected mart-ters, decided by •Iftis B] Court on 15-12-2006. pursuont to Ihe memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secre-tary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal ond the prospectus of biploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that •the nomenclature of the Bosic Training Insti-hJte, i.e., B.T.I. hos been changed and renamed os Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 tjBopesh Kumar Vermaw. The State Govt. of Chhatlisgarh widwwfhei) (Supra). 3. For Ihe aforementioned reasons, •the writ petitions are diqiosed of in terms of the decision of -this Court in the matter of yashwcatt Kumar Bharctt/waJ (Suprdj, ajbject to verification of the fact as to whelher the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./IS.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 cnd 1-3-1999 and further whe-ttier they have been paid Iwo advance increreents or not. No order <is to costs. 4. A copy of Ihis order be placed on the record of -the connected wr'rt petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 20060I)MPJK-C696 Thakur