IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.967 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision 10.02.2011 Shiv Charan ...... Petitioner VERSUS Ram Bharose and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr. , Advocate, for Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 04.02.2011 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nuh, dismissing the application, moved by the petitioner-plaintiff, for leading additional evidence. Admittedly, the petitioner while filing the suit has pleaded that defendant Nos.8 and 9 were minors and they were sued through Ayub his father, natural guardian and their next friend . Now he is estopped to say that they were not the minors at that time. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 10.02.2011 mamta-II