IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5024 of 1990 Date of decision : 25.11.2010 Ram Chander Syal and others … Petitioners. Versus The Punjab State Electricity Board. …Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Heena Talwar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Brar Advocate for the respondent-PSEB. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ritu Bahri, J. In the written statement filed by the respondents, it has specifically been mentioned that Board has re-revised the regulation and pass percentage has been reduced to 45% for three papers in one session and 50% in the 4th paper to pass the examination. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after passing of this regulation dated 21.11.1994, the writ petition has become infructuous. Writ petition is disposed of as such. (Ritu Bahri) Judge 25.11.2010 sd