IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18286 of 2008. [O&M] Date of Decision: 14th December, 2010. Gurudass Ram Petitioner through Mr. Puneet Jindal, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. K.D.S.Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks a Mandamus directing the respondents to release arrears of salary on account of revision of pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.1996 including balance gratuity along with interest @ 18% per annum. From the stand taken on behalf of the respondents, it appears that the petitioner's claims except for leave encashment, have been satisfied. As regard to leave encashment, the petitioner has filed a separate writ petition and the matter is sub-judice. Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case there is any other monetary benefit to which he may be entitled, he may make a representation to the respondents which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within a period of three months of its receipt. Disposed of. Dasti. December 14, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE