1 WP 514.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 514 OF 2011 (Dr. Sarika w/o Sachin Wani VS State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P.N. Kutti, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3 Mr. G.V. Wani, Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 9 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 01.12.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. We have perused the pleadings. From the perusal of the pleadings, it cannot be said that the criterion, which was applied by the respondent authorities while evaluating the candidates in the personal interview, is either arbitrary or irrational. In any case, out of 100 marks, 75 marks are earmarked for the marks obtained by the concerned candidate in the B.A.M.S. examination. It is only 25% marks, which are earmarked 2 WP 514.2011 for the oral interview. Even while allotting the said 25% marks, certain criterion has been laid out. It is the petitioner, who has secured the highest marks in the oral interview. 3. We do not find that any case is made out for interference. Rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]