^ Petitioner HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH: BILASPUg Writ Petitsen No< 4156 of 2003 Smt. Sahjahan Begum, ^eci about 50 years, wjdow ofj fate Abdul Wartid Faruqul, Assistant Teacher, |Vi?fageKapnar^,&lock Bastanar, Tah. Jagdalpuff, Distt:. Bastar (Chhattisgam); Present Address: .'];, Smt Sanajahan Begum ^idow of iate Abdui Wahid Famqui,: Near N^w Narahda Taikies, Pratapgarnj para, -J^d^ (ChhattJsgarh). tpyr, Qistt. Bastar Versys Respondents 1) State of IChhattisgarh, ttDfough :the Secretary; Departm^nt of Sbhooi Edu©ation,Gpvemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhavi?an, Manfraiay, Ralpur (CG). 'i.t: ' 2) The Director, Treasur/, Accounts and Pension, Government of | Ghhattjsgarh, D.K.S. Bhav^n, RaJpur(CG). ,i •; '. |j • ' ;, .: ' 3) The Joirft Direotor, Trea^ury, Aeoounts and Pension, jJegdaipur,(Chha|i:Jsgarh). | 4) Smt. Haiima Begum aiias l^atSu Beej, aged about 46 yeers, ^widowl of Late Sheihih Jajnaii FaruquL resldent af Shakoor Kirana Stote, J^wahar Ward, 'Near Bus:Stand,-Kanker, Distt. Kani^er (03). (Writ Petitbn under Articie 226 ofthe Constitution oflfndia) l' SB: Hort'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnlhotri, .Jl. | Preserrt: Shri A.K. Mishra, counsej for the petitioner Smt. Sunjta Jain, Pane! Lawyer forthe State. None appears fbr the respondent No.4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 8?>1 day ofMay, 2008) 1 VVith consent of iearned counsek appearing for thej {partjles, the matter is neard finaiiy. None appears fbr the responcient Nlo.4, despite sen/ice of notice. '-?<' ; < ' • . • . ' ' • . -.;.! , ; . This case pertalns tp grievance of non-grant of retral duesj. -r^ CM. ^sju This Court, in the matterof W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandai Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected maiers, dii^cted tne Committee to conssderthe matter of retrial dues as the disputed question offacts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State GQVernment; pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt.Keja Bai ! Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), j and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhatisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandai and another). Thus, this petition is squately covered by the judgment and order dated 31st Janua.ry, 2008 passed in V^'.P.No. 4642/2004 j.. • ' ,. '• . • (Baynath Mandai (supra) ) as submitted by iearned counseljappearing for the parties. . . . , '. . . _ ' ' . ^ ., • , . , • 11. • ' '. 2) This petltion is accordingiy disposed of in tne same terms i.e., the offlce of the Advocate Gen^ral Is airected to send tne case to the Committee, within a penod of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this oraer Thereafter, the Committee shaii issue notice tothe petitioner, offioers concern^d and raspondent No.4 within a further period of 15 da\^. The Committee shail|consider and pass order, in accordance v^ith law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petttioner and the officers concerned may fiie adGitiona! documents, if necessary. The eritire exercise, inciuding payment of retirai auesjf any, to the petitioner, be compieted wlthin a period oftbur months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. • i 3) The petitioner shaii suppiy one compsete set of the Retition tojthe State counsel tor transferring thesame to the Committee.r 1 • • , Sd/-. • | Satish K. Agnihotri ; Judge