;.^^^^1'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OP CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER s ^^L !T^^a ^w. AT BILASPUR Writ petitipn No, /2006 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) P.R.No, J,363/2QQ6 Mrs. Padma Ghosh W/o Mr. H.D. GoshAged about 43 years, Pblich Health Sister Tutor, Posted at General Nursing Training Centre, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mrs. M. Gyanik, W/o Mr. N.K. Gyanik, Aged about 45 years, Sister Tutor, Posted at G.N.M. Training Centre, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mrs. S. Singh W/o Mr S.C. Singh aged about 40 years, Sister Tutor, posted at D.H.S. Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mrs. I.M. Das W/o Mr. M. Das Aged about 44 years, Sister Tutor, Posted at G.N.M. Training Centre, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mrs. J. Daniel W/o Mr. A.S. Denial Aged about 39 years, Sister Tutor, Posted at G.N.M. Training Centre, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mrs K. Vaishnav W/o Mr. L.L. Vaishnav aged about 38 years, Sister Tutor posted at G.N.M. Training Centre, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mrs. S. Thomas W/o Mr. M. Thomas aged about- 40 years, Sister Tutor, Posted at Drd. Bheem Rao Ambedkar Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Mrs. S.D. Bogi, W/o Mr. D. Bhogi Aged about 42 years, Staff Nurse, It^l^^^ ;^?^;,'^^^7^^^^ ^"Sn^^SS^Sv^ l?^^^^!^ 's^sss&s. ^^l^^i EBBaSKIB ^'•^•S.i&S ^^^^^^^:± %si^^^ i-^ii^^i^ assss •qj^SsT^^qqo 'jndrey 'u^A^qg 'g"H'a 'B/'BIBJIUB]/\[ 'qjBSsp^qqo jo ^uauiujSAOQ 'S33TAJ3g q^p33H JO^OaJIQ (fr (qssp^jj ^qpEpi) ^edoqg 'WBWBVIQ 'Bpnd^TSQ 'd'V{ J° :U3tUUJ3AOO . 'SSOIAJSg t[11B3H J0^33JIQ (g ('d'M) redoqg 'UBABqg qq-BtTBA tT-tSVl^ieclaQ a.i'Bjpyyy AjTurej pu^ iptBSH onqnd Are^sjosg L[gnoji.[^ 'qsspB-rd vAqpvyi jo luautu-isAoo (g Bffi,! •M @^^^ss'^i1 ^SSSSX ^l •qjB§sp}Bqi[3jndrey 'UBMBqg 'S'a'Q 'eABps-i^uBn 'qjBgsp^qqo jo ^usmujsAOO ^usui^-i'Bdsa sj-BjisyvY ^IIHBJ sg q^BSH °n<:lrt(} 'Are^a.toss qSnojq^ q-lBSsp^Bqqo jo 3}B}g (T snsyaA •L(Je3si^^x.[i[o 'jndrey 'i^TdsoH -iv-sfpaqui-y ovy masqg -JQ }B paisoj 'ssjnM JjB^g 'sjesX g^ -^noqB psSv 3JJ;I3^AV •?! '-im o/AV ajjnsAAV •s -s^Tfii •qj^Ssp^iiqo 'jndrey '{B:idsoH re3(p3qtuv o-ey uissqg -JQ i-e psisod 'ssjn^ JjB^g 'SJBS^ ^^ ywqv psgy A3Q'N '-[Vl o/M A3Q BJdiqs •sjp\[ •qjBgsp^Bqq^ 'jndrey ''[e'^dsoyi -lESipaqiuv OBy uissqg -JQ ^B ps^sod (01 (6 sj.NaaNOdsaa ai wy ^ XI-ffC-22 '3^ •<tl<<i?i<<, a-al'y'is; i?«'ii'a'i< sii?B%r ! sn^i- WRW^fgg Roshan/- ^'for an^? wnwafeT' ll.S.2006 Shri Anupam Dybey, Advocjate for the petitioners. Shri Ashutosh Singh Kachi Heard. The petitioners, who are w< & FaiTiily Welfare, State of Chha this writ petition with a prayer respondents to grant cenfral pay Govemment and 4th 8s 5th pj Government employees, how th| scales being the State GovemiTJi petitibn. Moreover, it is settled Is^ the similar situated persons are to the petitioners, then of-course cBI'llK'iqll ^WVU ^ S ^it+AK %3'^El31I^[ aha, Govt.Adv. for the State. ^rking in the Department of Public Healfh ^tisgarh oh various posts, have preferred o .issue writ of mandamus directing the scale w.e.f, 1.1.1986 and revised 5ffi pay scalew.e.f. 1.1.1996 and furt^ier respondents be directed to grant allowances accordingly. Admitfedly, the petition^rs are the employees of the State ly c'ommissions were for the Central 'petitioners are entitled for tho^e pay ;nt employees is not mentioned in the that no writ of mandainus can be issued to the Govemment fo grant a patticular pay scale except on the ground if ;etting any pay scale and same is denied hey are entitle for parity under Article 14 of the Constitution 6f India. It 9as not been mentioned that whether the 1 State Govemment of Chhattisg^rh or erstwhile State of M.P. have ever taken a decision to grant the 4al <)>r 5<h pay scale to its employees, therefore, the writ petition is devoid of a^iy merit.as the same lacks in material. particulars, same is liable to be d|smissed and it is hereby dismissed, In view of this order, I.A. 1*^3.4935/06 stands disposed of. / ^ Q ^' ^f .<y'vA(2' ^-.^ ^M