IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2009 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13152 of 2009(L) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JINUMOL JACOB, U.P.S.A. M.T.H.S.S. VENMONY, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY MR.ELVIN PETER P.J, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA. 2. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, THE MAR THOMA & E.A.SCHOOLS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, SCS CAMPUS, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN - 689 101. BY MR. A.J. VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13152 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009. J U D G M E N T As per Exhibit P2, the petitioner was appointed as U.P.S.A in M.T.H.S.S, Venmony represented by the 3rd respondent- Corporate Manager. The petitioner submits that the said appointment was made in a permanent vacancy. Subsequently, Exhibit P2 order of appointment was forwarded to the first respondent by the second respondent for approval, but so far the approval has not been granted. In these circumstances, the petitioner has filed Exhibit P3 representation before the first respondent requesting him to approve the appointment of the petitioner. 2. It appears that the petitioner had been making enquiries in the matter and to the knowledge of the petitioner, objections have been raised regarding the approval of appointment based on Exhibit P4 Government Order. It is pointed out that this Court in a batch of cases as per Exhibit P5 judgment quashed the said W.P.(C) No.13152/09 2 Government Order. This Court after quashing the Government Order directed that all appointments, whether pending approval or already rejected, shall be considered/reconsidered by the Educational Officers concerned. Petitioner seeks for a similar direction in the matter. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the request for approval made by the Manager with regard to the appointment of the petitioner as per Exhibit P2 along with Exhibit P3 representation and in the light of the directions in Exhibit P5 judgment. Appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp W.P.(C) No.13152/09 3 T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. W.P.(C) No.13152 OF 2009 J U D G M E N T 21.05.2009