'^<a^ .c' ^KW HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATJ31LASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 618 of2009 N.A. No. 1S. 1. Sunder Singh, aged about 60 years, son of Rajno, Caste Kenv/at, Presidnet Machhua Swa Sahayata Samooh, Umariva, Block and Tahsil Basna. District Mahasamund (CG). 2. Handas son of Sahasram, aged about 35 years, Sea-etary, Machhua Swa Sahayata Samooh, Umariya, Block and Tahsil Basna, District Maliasamund (CG). VERSUS 1. Shatmghan Bariha son of Anant Ram, President, Jagriti Swa Sahayata Samooh, Umariya, Block and Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (CG). 2. Mmiketan Yadav son ofBeni Prasad, Secretary, Jagriti Swa Sahayata Sanooh, Umariya, BIock aad Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (CG). Applicants. 3. The Director, Panchayat, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (GG). 4. The Additional Collector, Mahasamund (CG). 5. The Chief Executive QBicer, Janpad Pauchayat Basna, District Matiasamund (CG). 6. President, Krishi Sthayi Samiti Basna, District Mahasamund (CG'i. N.A. No. 3, 4. • (WRIT PETmON UNDER /ATICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITOTION OF BMDIA) (8B: Hon'bte iVIr. Satish K. Aenihotri, J.) Present : ShriH.S. Patel, Advocatetbrthepetitioner. Siiri A.S. Ka^ihwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. (Passed on 2 day efFebreary, 2009 1. The petitioner, by this petition impugns tfae order dated 05.11.t)8 (Amiexure P/l), passed by the Director, Panchayat, whereby the Direetor, Panchayat, has •tffi. Sshu condoned delav of litteen days in filiag the revision against the order dated 13.08.08 (Annexure P/5), passedbyfhe Additional CoUectw, Mahasamund. 2. This is not a case offhe petitioner that the Dii-ector, Panchayat, has no power to condone the delay. Thus, there is no jurisdictional error in eondoning the delay offitteen days. The case is at the stage ofnotice. 3. This court cannot intertere with fhe impuened order wi the ground of lack of jurisdictional en-or, irregularity or illeeality inthe order. This petition deserves to be and is accordingly disiiiissed summarily. _—- J Sd/- - Satish K. Agnihotri Judge