IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.974 of 2001 Date of decision: August 13, 2010 Inder Pal and others .. Petitioners Vs. Ranjit Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioner. Proxy counsel for Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23.3.2001 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Karnal, discharging the accused for the offence under Section 323/506 IPC. The opinion with regard to the injuries No.1 and 2, on the person of the complainant, as given by the doctor is that the injuries could be self suffered. The injuries so caused on the person of the complainant are not consistent with the ocular version. There are material contradictions in the statements of the witnesses which go to the root of the case. The evidence appears to have been appreciated in the right perspective. The scope of interference at the revisional stage is very limited in nature. Nothing has been shown which may render the judgment as illegal or invalid. The law is very much settled that even if two views are possible then the view favourable to the accused would be taken as correct. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. August 13, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge