IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32979 of 2009 JASWANT SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections- 307 and 435 of I.P.C. and ¾ of Explosive Substances Act. The submission is that the F.I.R. is against unknown. His name has transpired on the confession of a co-accused who also does not state his presence at the time of occurrence. The F.I.R. notices suspicion against one Lakshmi Singh of involvement. The impugned order of rejection has been passed after perusal of the case diary. It notices that the name of the petitioner transpired during investigation and refers to four paragraphs of the case diary without discussing the nature of the materials on which his name has transpired. No reasons have been assigned for rejecting the bail of the petitioner. Consideration of bail application involves the liberty of the citizen. This Court has no hesitation in holding that the 2 court below declined to disclose any reasons because it was itself not satisfied of the sufficiency of the materials as otherwise it would have assigned reasons for rejection of the prayer for bail. This Court, therefore, is satisfied that the petitioner is entitled to bail. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.D.Upadhaya, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case No.121/06, Trial No.3105/09. Let a copy of this order be sent to the presiding officer who has passed the impugned order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)