-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2628 OF 2010 Vithal Trimbak Khairnar. ..Petitioner. Versus Dharamaji D. Khiarnar & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Harshad E. Palwe for the petitioner. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : April 5, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. Palwe, learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order, the Joint Charity Commissioner condoned the delay of approximately 10 years occurred in filing the revision. By the said revision, respondent no.2 challenged the order dated 15th May 1998 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner under section 22 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act. While considering the application for condonation of delay, the Joint Charity Commissioner found that the order impugned in the revision was an ex-parte and respondent no.2 was not aware of the said order. Respondent no.2 immediately upon getting knowledge of the said order from the discussion of villagers, filed above said revision alongwith an application for condonation of delay. The Joint Charity Commissioner accepting the explanation of respondent, condoned the delay by exercising discretion. The Joint Charity Commissioner condoned the delay subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- by -: 2 :- respondent no.2 to the petitioner. I do not find any error in the impugned order so as to enable me to interfere with the impugned order in my writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is devoid of any merit and same is therefore dismissed. (R.V. MORE, J.)