1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 5197 of 2010 Maharashtra Krushi v. State of Maharashtra and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.S. Nagpure, Adv for petitioner Mr A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respdts 1 and 2 Mr Arun Agrawal, Adv for respdt no.3 Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 25th January 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner; learned AGP for respondents no. 1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 2. Grievance of the petitioner is in respect of grant of extension or re-appointment in service given by respondent no. 3 to respondent no. 4 under resolution dated 28.6.2010. Resolution passed by respondent no. 3 Corporation in its meeting held on 28.6.2010 reads thus : “IT BE AND HEREBY RESOLVED that Shri Moreshwar Hardas working as General Manager (F & A) are hereby reappointed from 1st July 2010 for a period of two years as per provision of Section 26 (2) of Service 2 Rules of the Corporation.” 3. Considering the issue involved, we feel it appropriate to allow the petitioner to approach respondent no. 3 Corporation for redressal of its grievance against the resolution which is impugned in the present petition instead of showing indulgence in the petition. 4. In the circumstances, writ petition disposed of. It is open for the petitioner to make representation against the impugned resolution to respondent no. 3 Corporation within a period of two weeks from today. If such representation is made, we direct respondent no.3 Corporation to consider the same in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard and take a decision thereon within a period of four weeks after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. JUDGE JUDGE joshi