HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.11841 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.10.2011 **** Harbans Singh Kandhola . . . . Petitioner VS. Union of India & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. JEYAPAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. MS Khaira, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dharminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. IPS Doabia, Advocate for respondents No.1&2 Mr. Amol Rattan Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3 Mr. H.S.Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Sr. Standing Counsel UT Chandigarh None for respondent No.6 Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.7 **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). No sooner the case was taken up for hearing, it is stated by Mr. Dharmender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner that during the interregnum the SGPC elections have been held and the prayer made in this writ petition in a way is rendered infructuous. He, however, submits that CWP No.11841 of 2010.doc - 2 – the petitioner shall submit a representation to the Government of India seeking the relief as prayed for in this writ petition. (2). We accordingly dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit such representation to the appropriate authority. (3). Disposed of accordingly. (SURYA KANT) Judge (M. JEYAPAUL) Judge 18.10.2011 vishal shonkar (M.M.S. BEDI) Judge