IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.13638 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: August 29,2006 Sudhir Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Tourism Corporation …..Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Raman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The petitioner had accepted his appointment granted to him on compassionate basis on January 14, 2004 without any protest. In these circumstances, we are satisfied that the petitioner cannot be heard to claim any higher post. Even otherwise, we are satisfied that the prupose of granting compassionate appointment was merely to provide some benefit to the family of the petitioner to tide over the difficult situation. Dismissed. (Viney Mittal) Judge August 29,2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge