IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2009 / 30TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26714 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.A.SHERIF, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.ABU SALIM, RESIDING AT BAHIHRA MANZIL, ILLICKAL, KILIROOR P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No. 26714/09. APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS P1. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.21.12.99 IN O.P.No. 30553/99 OF THIS COURT. P2. COPY OF THE ORDER OF R1 DTD.30.7.09. P3. COPY OF THE ENDORSEMENT DTD.17.9.09. P4. COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.17.9.09. P5. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.5.7.96 IN O.P.No. 10599/96. sdk+ ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge . S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.26714 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite settlement of timings in respect of the permit granted in favour of the petitioner, the permit is not being issued in view of my order in W.P. (C).No.28913/2009. On 16.10.2009, I passed the following interim order in this writ petition: 'The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although permit has been granted and timings have been settled, permit is not being issued in view of an order in W.P.(C).No.28913/2009. The petitioner has produced a copy of that order before me. That order states like this: “Notice by speed post. Any order passed would be subject to the result of the Writ petition.” That order does not prohibit issue of permit to the petitioner at all. It only says that such issue of permit would be subject to the result of the writ petition. Therefore, I make it abundantly clear that the order in W.P.(C). No.28913/2009 would not stand in the way of the 2nd respondent issuing permit to the petitioner, if timings have been settled. Post along with W.P.(C).No. 28913/2009 on 22.10.2009.” Today when the matter was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order, the permit has been issued. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above interim order. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2