...••'Aw<r> ...-••''A/^"' K'.'-^L^' .--•.'-l\A.'?<^k--'" ...rf'ft>iy^ /•-•N-^-'' •'<°* <: ^y^- A-" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR r.p.NO. ,q 7-0 /2006 PBTITHONER RBSPONDENTS <••' ,^'~\"^' / ^ / . -&z ^ /^" ^ Tarun Kumar Meshram, Aged about 49 years, S/o. Chintaram Meshram, R/o. Sub-Engineer, Main Road, Village Raaitarai, Durg, Distt, . Durg (CG) VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) / 21 Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Departnient; Raipur, District Raipur (CG) / 3] Chief Engineer, Mahanadi-Godawari Kachhar (Basin), Raipur, District Raipur (CG) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA %» ^ o" ..^ T XI-HC-22 an^iq.r R-ii.+ sn^i sbtlich.'Hff^ ^53 '^ipTRT1!, aw'y'iio, 'f^iraiy *<l*iWTgiW«i ^....8:^M 3n^?r TCiiwgftB 2-3. Shri Vaibhav &overd'nan. cdunse! tor the petitioner. 5hri Satish &uDta, Dy. 6ovt Advocate tor the 5tate. Artlcle 226/227 of rhe Constitution of he is serving as 5ub Divisiona! but during the Dersod i.e. trom iadv&rse entry teas made In his who was junior to him but was in- By this Detition under India. the petitioner submlts Otticsr since last 25 years, 29-7-2002' to 27-7-2003 or, contidentiai reoort by an otticeit charoe. Learned counsel submitsl the contidentialreport ho.ve. not a-id the Detitioner came to kn^ Learned counsel submits •itsat aDDiication seeKin.3 ihtorwation gdvsrse remarks in the contideril] Shr.l 6oyerdhan. iearned counsei that the oetitioner submitted P/4, but the same have not yetl Haying considered and wi- merits ot the case. in tMe ODinion served it a direction is ah qiwli'i'iil-t w^raT ^ fs^t TSsR^R ^F 3lPg'C[ 311^1 ii ^.yiia 1G TO TFie p< was denied oromotion. th4i*eatter the Detitionersubmitted an and it reveled that because ot ial re&ort he has not been Dromoted. rejjiresen iresentations o.s'oe.r Annexure-P/3 & been considered by the .authori+ies hout exDrsssing any ODinion on the ot this Court. ends of .justice wiii be the Detjtloner to mate a, detaiied [Tjt^ti^^ XI-HC-22 ^^^T -Tei.TqRn^ra, •®:araTt?.nway SD^TT! R<-ii.<* sv^i >»i*i ^ifid ^DU^: t- ^ ^ WqplT Sht|l<*i "^ "S^lo^ •"HT. 3n^T?^ITW^^! atre.sh raising ht alonqwith a CODV of the petitio same sha!i I own merits within a considered and dq accordance with It reaulred the made clear that if any cirievance iiiabie ^i^^ii HRcff^fe^ <Pn'^.i< ^ sv^if an^f - E grievances before resDondent No.l |) and this o"der within a Deriod of luch a reoresentation being tiied the pided by the resoondent No.l on its iaw as eariy o.s oossible Dr'eferably Itrom 1tse date ot Droduction orf- the evMtVicKtii'i-a.^s.w<?^<(M iDetitioner/.may alsd be he'ard. It .is •At^ • ' ttiil r'emairis, the Detttioner may'avaii With the aforesaid obseniations, this Betition stands disDosed ConseauentSY,i.A.No.220(f| C.'ertitted CODY as oer rule^ [iUU6 aiso stands diSposed ot. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['^ ^tSi^