HiaH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ PetItioafSI Wo.6752/2007 PeUtioner 1. Dharam singh Rawate s/o Shri Bha§sttrasa. Rawate age about 40 ycars, Assistaat Teaoher, Govt Primaiy Schoo], Bhothiparkala Sioghola, Tahsfl 85 Dist. Rajiiandgaon(CG) 2. CUuteshwarTiwari s/o Late Shri Keshava Tiwari, age about 46 years, Assistant Tcacher Govt. Middle School, Hatdi, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnaudgaon(CG) 3. Smt Rashmi Raid Bakfashi w/o Gajendra Bakhshi age about 39 years, Asst. Teacher, Hr. Sec. School, Basaatpur Dist. Rajnandgaon(CG) Versus 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, fhroiigh fhe Secretary, Education & Tribal Welfare Departmcnt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G) 2. District Educatiou officer, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G) 3. Block Education oflBeer Rajnandgaon(C. G) Writ petitioa under Article 226 ofthe Constttatlon of India RESPOMDENTS Ajes'easawse: Shri Soiukaat Verma, counsel for thc Ptetitioaers. Sltri AJay Dwivedi, Paael Lawycr for fhe State/ respondents on advance copy ORAL ORDBR (2S.9.2007) SuaII Kumar Slnha. J. Leamed coiuisel appearing for fhe petitioners as also for the State/respondents joiatfy subinit that the WP(S)5752/2007 facts and question of law iavolved ia the present writ petition are squarety covered by fhe decision ofthis Court in case of yashwant Kunuv Sharai&isaj -os- SSa.mtefpfd CorporeiUon, Duty and einother reported in ^006 ftf MPJR CG 96. In subsequent cases, i.e., Wnt petitioa (S) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemant Kuiaar Vishwakanna Vs. State of Chhattisgarh aad others) and ofhcr connected inatter, decided by fhis Court on 12.12.2006, pureuant to the memo dated 28.1.1995, issued by fhe Secretaiy, Board of Secondaiy Education, Bhopal and the prospcctus of Diploma ia Education Examination, it was clBrified that the noinenclature of the Basic TraiTimg Institute i.e. B.T.I., has been chaaged and renamed as Diploina ia Education i.e. D.Ed. Accordingly, fhe D.Ed., certificate holders are also covered by fhe decision in W.P.(S) No.5862/2006 (Hemcint Kumar Vishwakccrma -vs- State of C.G& others (supra). For fhe aforeinentioned reasons, the writ i»tttionis disposted of in terms of fhe decision of this Court in ffae iiiatter of Yashwant Kumar Bhttrdwaj (suprdf, sabject to verification of fhe fact as to whethcr thc petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I.certi&cates at fheir own expenses as per the cixcidar dated 24.12.1998 & 01.3.1999 and further whetfaer fhey have been paid advaace increments or not. No order as to costs. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunita