1 IN THE EHIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA FIRST APPEAL NO. 106 OF 2004 Sakharam B. Naik(since deceased) through L.Rs. ... Appellants versus The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Panaji-Goa. ... Respondents Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. E. Afonso, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2009. P.C.:- The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents in both the appeals have taken an objection with regard to the maintainability of the appeals and also argued that the authority for whose benefit the land was acquired ,namely Corporation has been completed as a party before the Reference Court or in the present appeal. According to him, the Judgment of the Reference Court thus cannot be liable to be set aside in view of the Judgment reported in ((1995) 2 SCC 326). 2 The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant obviously has no answer to this. Consequently, the Judgment under appeal is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Reference Court for adjudication. We hope that the Court will decide the matter expeditiously and in any case not later than six months. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE RD