IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 33600 of 2004(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- POCKER, S/O. KUNHABDULLA CHANGARAMKANDYTHAZHEKUNI, PERAMBRA. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. PERAMBRA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PERAMBRA P.O., KOZHIKODE. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, KOZHIKODE. 3. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. NADATHALAKKAL C.K. AMMATH S/O. MOIDEEN, CHERUKUNNATH, PERAMBRA P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHIBU JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 33600 of 2004(Y) --------------------------------- APPENDIX ------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------ EXT.P1. COPY OF THE LICENSE ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYATH FOR THE YEAR 2003-04 TO THE PETITIONER DATED 6.1.04. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH DATED 5.2.04. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH DT. 2.3.2004. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE DECISION NO.173/2003-04 DT. 15.3.2004 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH . EXT.P5. COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1T RESPONDENT DT. 18.3.2004 REJECTING THE RENEWAL APPLICATION. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO11149/2004 DT. 6.4.2004. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT IS DT. 4.5.2004. EXT.P8. COPY OF G.O. (RT) NO.3882/2004 /LSGD, DT. 5.11.2004 EXT.P9. COPY OF PLAINT IN OS NO.199/2003 MUNSIFF COURT, PERAMBRA DT. 12.2003. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 33600 of 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers: 1. Call for the entire records, which lead to Ext.P4, P5 and P8 and issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction setting aside the same. 2. Issue a writ of mandamus order or direction directing the 1st respondent to renew Ext.P1 licence based on Ext.P2 application. 3. Issue a writ of mandamus order or direction directing the 1st respondent to allow the to continue his fish vending business strictly in accordance to the terms in Ext.P1 at Building Number Public Prosecutor VII/825 F of Perambra Panchayath. 2. By interim order passed by this Court on 19.11.2004, the petitioner was allowed to conduct the fish stall. In the mean time, seven years have been elapsed. Since the petitioner is allowed to continue the business, the interim order is made absolute. The learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent has no objection in the petitioner continuing the business in the same place. Submission is recorded. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv B.P. RAY, J. ----------------------------------------------------------- O.P.No. 13887 of 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT