IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5568 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAJENDRA B DAVE Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BP TANNA for Petitioner GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date of decision: 20/04/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT #. The learned senior counsel Mr.B.P.Tanna, appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the statement made in affidavit-in-reply to the effect that the petitioner has been duly considered as on due date for consideration and on such consideration he has been given the appointment and posting on the post of Additional Collector and that the remarks in question have not in any way adversely affected the consideration or posting of the petitioner, the petition does not survive and has become infructuous. #. In view of this statement and the learned AGP confirming this fact, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. ( D. H. WAGHELA, J.) kks