IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4407 of 2009 Ranjit Pandit @ Ranjit Kumar, son of Sitaram Pandit, Resident of Village-Gorhaib, P.S. Bishanpur, District- District-Darbhanga …………………………..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 02. 06. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 117/07 instituted on the basis of Complaint Case No. 1246/2007 for offences under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. As per allegation, the complainant is being consenting party to the physical relationship between the petitioner and the complainant of six years. Subsequently, when the petitioner refused to marry her, a case has been registered under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegations are false. There is no question of marriage of the petitioner along with the complainant who has already been married to some one else. Considering the facts, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner, namely, Ranjit Pandit @ Ranjit Kumar in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 2 117/07 is allowed, in case he surrenders before the court concerned within four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. m.p. (Mridula Mishra, J.)