IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 79 OF 2009 M/S. ARMANCAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus DOM FRANCISCO RESIDENTS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for the Appellants. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL, J. Date:- 1st February, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. This appeal from order is filed against impugned order passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji in Special Civil Suit No. 108/07/B. The learned Counsel Shri Ramani submitted that the reasons recorded by the Court are against record and are erroneous. The appellants' business is suffering due to the advertisement issued by the original defendants in the year, 2007. 3. I have perused the impugned order/the order of rejection of plaint in the proceedings of Civil Suit No.2/2006. 4. It was submitted by the Counsel that the advertisement was issued by respondents on 12/11/2007. The suit filed by the respondents was rejected on 10/01/2008. The learned Counsel stated that after the year, 2007, the respondents did not issue any advertisement affecting the business of the appellants or in respect of the suit property. 5. In the light of the fact that no advertisement was issued by the respondents, than the one which was earlier issued in the year, 2007, the appellants, in my view, do not have cause of action for claiming interim relief. 6. In view of the above, I do not find any error in the impugned order. Appeal from order stands dismissed. NARESH H. PATIL, J. NH