1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8289 OF 2010 Gangabai w/o Devrao Kadam .. PETITIONER VERSUS Syed Ahmed Hussain s/o Ali Hassan & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.R. Chaukidar, advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 The Sub-Divisional Officer while entertaining the appeal presented to him raising exception to the revenue entry recorded in the matter has directed the parties to maintain status quo. Said interim order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer was subjected to challenge before the Additional Commissioner in revision application. The revision application, however, has been turned down by the Additional Commissioner holding that the same is not entertainable. Without going into the merits of the controversy, it would be desirable to direct the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide the pending appeal as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months. Revenue 2 entry which is subject matter of challenge before the appellate authority i.e. the Sub-Divisional Officer shall be subject to final outcome of the appeal pending before the Sub-Divisional Officer. In the meantime, the revenue authority shall not cause any change in respect of revenue entries which are subjected to challenge before the Sub-Divisional Officer. With these directions, the petition stands disposed of. The Sub-Divisional Officer shall proceed to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8289.10.odt