1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2005 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2005 Smt.Mehjabeen @ Shahin Bap M.Saudagar. ..Applicant. V/s. Shri Imran Allabaksh Mujawar. ..Respondent. Mr.Sudatta Patil for applicant. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 17, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Cause made out in the application to my mind is not sufficient cause. However, for the mistake of the advocate as the litigant should not suffer, in the interest of justice, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) on condition that the advocate on record for the applicant shall pay costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee quantified at Rs.750/- within one week from today as condition precedent.