IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.44839 OF 2008 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THRU.CBI. ********** 2 03/08/2011 Heard Counsel for the parties. This application has been filed challenging the order taking cognizance dated 27.03.2006 passed in Special Case No. 31 of 2005, arising out of SPE/CBI RC No. 29 (A) of 2005 in a case of disproportionate asset. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits tht his grandfather died leaving behind huge landed property, both agricultural and residential. Besides which, his grandfather had collected enormous sum of money because of the royalty paid to him for the 30 books. It is submitted that he is the member of the joint Hindu family, and thus, the Central Bureau of Investigation has not made correct verification before institution of the case. These facts will have to be proved by the petitioner at the appropriate stage of the case and cannot be taken into account for the purpose of taking cognizance. I see no illegality in the order impugned, and as such, this application is dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )