IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 228 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18909/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------ BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (BSS), IMPC, ERNAKULAM. A.R.MOHANAN, S/O.A.A.RAMAN, AGED 51 YEARS,WORKING AS DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, BSS, IMPC, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.C.S.RAMANATHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- MINI ANTONY,W/O. UNKNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED NOW KNOWN, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COHCIN, ERNAKULAM. SRI.PRAVEEN K.JOY, SC FOR CORPORATION THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Cont.Case(C) NO. 228 OF 2009 (S) ========================= Dated this the 26th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T In this contempt petition, what is alleged is that Annexure A1 to A3 orders passed by this Court in WP(C) No.18909/08 directing acceptance of permit fee of Rs.10,000/- each from the petitioner has not been complied with. 2. Today, during the course of the arguments, it was made clear by the respondents that they have no difficulty in accepting the fee, but however, they will be dealing with the applications on its merits. As at present, this Court is only concerned with the compliance of Annexure A1 to A3 orders where direction has been issued to accept the permit fee. 3. When this position was made clear, counsel for the respondents agree to accept payment of permit fee from the petitioner without prejudice to their right to decide on the applications. In view of the above, contempt is closed recording the undertaking of the respondents that permit fee if remitted, will be accepted in compliance with Annexure A1 to A3. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp