IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4636 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR, Son of Dharam Nath Pandit, R/o Mohalla Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Bhutnath Road, Agam Kuan, P.s. Agam Kuan, District Patna …….. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Devendra Pd. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, A.P.P. ---- 3 03.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the statement of landlady had been recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. during the course of investigation and it has been stated by her that when the alleged garage has been taking for keeping the vehicle, the petitioner’s mother has negotiated with her, thus, petitioner was no where in picture. It is submitted that petitioner was already in custody with regard to another case, namely, Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 120 of 2009 for the offences under section 406 of the Indian - 2 - Penal Code since 2.6.2009 and has been remanded in this case on 23.10.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, JITENDRA KUMAR, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 229 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court - 3 - concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)