IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Smt. Sarita Versus State of Haryana. CRM-M No. 24849 OF 2011 Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. ****** This is a petition for regular bail in case FIR No. 675 dated18.12.2010 under Section 302/34 IPC, registered at P.S.City Ballabhgarh. On 18.8.2011, the following contention was noticed. “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is a lady who has been in custody since 18.12.2010 and even if the allegations in the FIR are taken to be correct it is highly unlikely that in the presence of four male members of a family she would also cause injuries.” Learned DAG has accepted the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.12.2010 and on instructions from ASI Rajbir Singh stated that two male members of her family are still in custody. He has, however, denied that the allegations against the petitioner were highly unlikely as has been alleged. Keeping In view the above, I deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner on her furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. September 28, 2011 (AJAY TEWARI) mamta JUDGE