IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (SJ) No.279 of 2011 RENU SINHA @ RENU KUMARI SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIG ----------- 02. 11.03.2011. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant Sri Ujjwal Kumar, and also Sri Ramakant Sharma, learned A.P.P. for the State who has preferred an appeal under Section 341 of the Cr.P.C. against an order passed by the Special Judge, Vigilance Trap, Patna in Special Case No.61 of 2007 on 2.2.2011, the court is firm in its opinion that the petition filed by the present appellant was rightly rejected by the learned Special Judge inasmuch as no offence for which a complaint ought to have been filed by the court after holding an enquiry under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. appears committed. Mere recording certain facts in the case diary without the maker of the case diary or the officer who had recorded those facts or without proving any fact which could constitute any offence which is indicated by Section 195 of the Cr.P.C., no enquiry under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. be held. The appellant appears filing 2 a completely mischievous petition before the learned trial Judge probably to delay the trial. The appeal is dismissed as of no merit on account of the above reason. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)