IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12992 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 26, 2010. Bachittar Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Seema Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has civil as well as criminal litigation against respondent No.5, as averred by him in the writ petition itself. He now seeks a mandamus to direct the police-authorities not to interfere in his alleged possession and/or to restrain respondent No.5 from interfering in his cultivating possession over the suit land. Having regard to the seriously disputed questions of fact and the nature of multiple litigation between the parties, while no case to issue a direction by this Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.3 & 4 to take some decision on the petitioner's pending application in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three weeks, from the C.W.P.No .12992 of 2010 2 date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 26, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE