IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2301 of 2009 1. SAMITA KUMARI, WIFE OF ATMA RAM YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILL. PARORIA, P.O. MANGALRARH, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 2. SWITA KUMARI, WIFE OF SHASHI KANT KARN, RESIDENT OF VILL. MALIPUR, P.O. MANGALRARH, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 3. MEENA KUMARI, WIFE OF SHIV KUMAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILL. PARIRIA, P.O. MANGALRARH, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 4. NIRMALA DEVI, WIFE OF DANEENDRA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARORIA, P.O. MANGALRARH, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI ASANGWACHUA AOO, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 3. SRI AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ROSERA, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 4. BALAKANT PATHAK, THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 5. RAJESH KUMAR, DIRECTOR INVESTIGATING CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BIHAR, PATNA. 6. SHUSHMA BHELERIO TOPPO, THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER(C.D.P.O.) HASANPUR, BLOCK HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 7. RAM SAGAR YADAV, SON OF LATE TRIVENI YADAV, MUKHIA, PARORIA GRAM PANCHAYAT, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 8. BINDU KUMARI, WIFE OF HARI KRISHNA MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILL. DATH, P.O. BHARWARI, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 9. ANITA KUMARI, WIFE OF RAJESH KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILL. BHARWARA, P.O. BHARWARA, P.S. HASANPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 10. SUNITA KUMARI, WIFE OF RAMADHAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILL. PARORIA, P.S. HASANPUR, P.O. MANGALGARH, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 11. NANDNI DEVI, WIFE OF UMA KANT PODDAR, RESIDENT OF VILL. PARORIA, P.S. HASANPUR, P.O. MANGALGARH, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 12. SAROJ KUMARI, WIFE OF SURESH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILL. PARORIA, P.O. MANGALGARH, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 13. PARMILA DEVI @ PARMILA KUMARI, WIFE OF RAM PUKAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILL. RAM NAGAR, P.S. HASANPUR, P.O. MANGALGARH, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. 14. NIRMALA ROY, WIFE OF MAHESHWAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILL. PARORIA, P.S. HASANPUR, P.O. MANGALGARH, DIST. SAMASTIPUR. ----------- 03. 28.04.2010 In compliance of my order dated 18.12.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No.1400 of 2007, Annexure-1, the District Magistrate, Samastipur has passed order dated 17.8.2009 which has been sent to the petitioners under Memo No.897 dated 24.8.2009 and is contained in Annexure-A to the show cause. In the circumstances, prayer made in the contempt application has become infructuous which is, - 2 - accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the order dated 17.8.2009 by filing another writ application. Cause shown by the office is wholly unsatisfactory in view of the fact that show cause was filed on 24.2.2010 which was not sent to the list section for appending with the brief until 21.4.2010 when the matter was first taken up for consideration, in the circumstances the same be examined by the Administrative Officer concerned, who should further submit report to this Court. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)