IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21666 of 2008 Between: Sri Ganesh Seva Society SVNVR Gajapathinagar, (Ganesh Nagar) Salagramapuram, P.S. Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its Secretary M.S. Prakasha Rao S/ao. Late Ramaswami Naidu, aged 58 yrs R/o. Plot No. 181, SVNVR, Gajapathi Nagar, Saligramapuram (PO) Visakhapatnam-24 .... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. 3 Board of Trustees, Rep. bys its Chairman, Port Trust Visakhapatnam. 4 The Controller, Baba Atamic Research Centre, Central Complex, Trombay, Mumbai. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 in making construction of compound wall obstructing the Kacha Passage Providing ingress and egress to the Ganesh Nagar Colony to the existing 60' wide road as illegal, arbitrary violative of fundamental rights and consequently issue directions to the respondent No. 3 to hand over the required land admeasuring 1778 sq. yds (400' x 40') as per the legally available remedies for the purpose of laying road and providing infrastructure facilities to the Ganesh Nagar Colony and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.GANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21666 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________ G.ROHINI, J Dt.25-06-2009 RAR THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21666 of 2008 DATED : 25-06-2009