yvfVf 8?^G3-! 0 ^, d) BEFORE THE HON'BLEiIIGHLCpUIlT^F CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W,P.(S)NO. t^\rl V I 201 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^ -^s^^ ^'^f' ^•y ^^'.-••' <yy V.K.Shrivastava, S/o Late Shri S.S.Dharshan, aged about57 years, Working as Executive Engineer, Mini Mata Bango Canal Diyision no. 5 ,under Kelo Dam Project Circle , Kharsia, District-Raigarh(C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Principal Secretaiy, .Water Resource Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . 2) • Engineer-In-Chief, Water Resource Department, Sihawa Bh^wan, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) 3) ShriA.K.Somawar, S/o Shri V.R.Somawaf, aged about 49 years, Executive Engineer , Mini Mata Bango Canal, Division.. no. 4 Dabhara,District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CPNSTITUTION OF INDIA 1) PARTICULARS OF PETITIONER: As mentioned in the cause title above. 2) PARTICULARS OF THB RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the cause title above. 3) PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHltli THE PETITION IS MADE : (i) Order dated 30/07/2011 ss fT/L^- Wlfl- (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) VERSUS V.K. Shrivastava State ofChhattisgarh and others P^^ C* £?L?^y I! * (S^^i Bi, nd Dadariya, counse! fc ths Shri Ar petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thai<ur, Dy. A.G for the State/respondsnt No.1. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counsel for respondent No.2. Smt .Meena Shastry, counsei for respondent No.3. Shri Shaiiendra Shukla, counsel for inten/ener. (16.11.2011) During the pendency of the writ petition, certain orders have been passed by the State Government including that oftransfer of the petitioner as Incharge, Superintendent Engineer. 2. !n view of this development, learned counse! for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 3. Petition js accordingly dismissed as having become jnfructuous. ftsri^?y'akar 3udgP :/f fi ^.::'y •^m !. Es-wS