IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2009 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 35261 of 2009(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.NISHA, U.P.S.A., ADV U.P.SCHOOL, PERINGANDOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.R.SADEESAN SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH SRI.A.HAROON RASHEED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANAGER, ADV U.P.SCHOOL, PERINGANDOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.35261/2009-C ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein is working as U.P.S.A in the school managed by the third respondent. Initially, the petitioner was appointed as L.P.S.A from 15/10/2004 to 01/09/2009 in a long leave vacancy of Smt.K.N.Sathidevi, the approval of which was rejected by the second respondent as per Ext.P1. The petitioner had a different spell of appointment from 01/06/2005 to 01/09/2009 against a leave vacancy, which was approved by Ext.P2 order. The petitioner was later appointed as U.P.S.A in a resignation vacancy from 05/08/2008 as per Ext.P4 order. In Ext.P3, the Government took the view that Ext.P1 appointment of the petitioner from 15/10/2004 to 01/09/2009 cannot be considered on regular basis. By Ext.P5 Judgment in W.P. (C).No.35638/2007 dated 27/02/2009, this Court directed the second respondent to take a decision in the matter. Ext.P6 is the order by which the approval of appointment, as L.P.S.A, has been granted from 15/10/2004. 2. The approval of the appointment as per Ext.P4 stands declined by Ext.P7 order against which the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 revision petition. It is prayed that the revision petition may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. W.P.(C). No.35261/2009 -:2:- 3. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that Ext.P8 has been received and is pending. 4. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P8 after hearing the petitioner and the Manager within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms