1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.834 OF 2009 Tata Capital Limited ..Petitioner V/s. Hemant Vasant Kulkarni ..Respondent Mr.Rahul Mehta with Mr.Nikhil Mehta i/b.M/s.KMC LEGAL VENTURE, Advocate, for the petitioner The respondent present in person CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. . The parties have invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short Arbitration Act) and exploring possibility of settlement and have accordingly signed the Consent Terms. There is no dispute about the signature, identification and authorization of the same. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by both the parties as well as the Advocate 2 for the petitioner. In view of this, the present Arbitration Petition stands disposed of in view of the Consent Terms. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)