1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1590 OF 2010 (M/s. Nav Bharat Hindi Daily vs. Mukund Vithalrao Vairagade) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 15, 2010. None for the respondent even today. One chance was given to the respondent to appear and contest, on 04.05.2010. In the circumstances, I have heard Shri Randive, learned counsel for the petitioner. He points out that at the time when the respondent was appointed, there was only one establishment and hence condition of transfer was not expressly mentioned therein. He, however, states that the order specifically stipulated that rules and regulations and conditions of service applicable in the establishment will regulate the service conditions of the respondent. According to him, after other establishments started, the condition of transfer has been incorporated in the appointment orders of other employees and hence it has become a condition of service automatically also for the respondent. The learned Member of Industrial Court, after considering the rival contentions, has stayed the transfer order on 06.01.2010. The transfer order is dated 2 17.12.2009. In this situation, I find it appropriate to expedite the proceedings in Complaint ULPN No. 477 of 2009 on the file of Industrial Court at Nagpur. It is made clear that the Industrial Court will decide the controversy after the parties lead their respective evidence afresh, uninfluenced by its observations in the impugned order. The learned Member of Industrial Court shall attempt to decide the complaint at the earliest. With these directions, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.