CRP 327/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. DK Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. R. Chakrab orty, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. This revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26.7.1 1 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Morigaon in T.S. No.4/08. The petitioner filed an application before the trial court as plaintiff praying to summon the Income-Tax Officer/Accountant to adduce his evidence in co nnection with the suit. The learned trial court on consideration of the petiti on, rejected the prayer for not showing sufficient reasons for the omission to m ention the name of such witness in the list of witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are good and suffi cient reasons for not furnishing the list of witnesses earlier. Considering the above and upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, I propose to dispose of the revision petition with a direction to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the trial court by showing reasons as to why the names of witnesses were dropped and not listed in the list of witnesses . In the event of filing such application by the petitioner in connection with the case, the learned trial court shall consider the same in accordance with law . The petitioner is directed to file such application within a period of 2 weeks from today. With the above direction, this revision petition stands disposed of.