IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5845 of 2009 NARAYANJI JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 12.05.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that the petitioner makes limited prayer that he proposes to file a representation and the Respondents may be directed to consider it. Learned counsel fort the University points out that the claim is for alleged arrears of salary from July, 1999. Strong reliance is placed on certain orders of this Court with regard to the persons who were more vigilant to their rights and came to this Court for their salary in the years 2001, 2002 appended as Annexures to the writ application. The petitioner cannot equate himself with those who were vigilant. The writ application is, therefore, disposed in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in (2001) 8 SCC 378 on issue of salary. It is further made clear that this order for disposal of his representation by the Court at the request of the petitioner shall be circumscribed by the orders of the Supreme Court as laid down in (2008) 10 SCC 155 (C. Jacob v. Director of Geology and Mining and another). AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)