IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 186 OF 2010 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 1898 OF 2010 V.P.K URBAN CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD REP. MS. RATNA S. AMONKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI. VINAYAK ATMARAM PARSEKAR ... Respondent Shri D. Pangam, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.2. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 10th August, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. The Complainant has sought leave to appeal against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. One of the grounds of acquittal is that on the date of the cheque i.e. 26-8-2006 the due amount was Rs.19,550. The cheque is for Rs.20,000/-. In other words, the cheque issued was for an amount which was more than due to the Complainant. That being the position, and in the light of the Judgment of this Court in the case of Laxmikant D. Naik Karmali v. Santosh V. Naik(2006(2) DCR(Cri) 830), this is not a case for grant of leave. Application disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.