HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. WRIT PETITiON No.2176 OF 2006 PETITIONERS PLAiNTSFFS 1. 2. 3. 4. RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS Sarita D/o Nandkeshwar, Aged about 26 years, Punita D/o. Nandkeshwar, Aged about 25 years Sunita D/o Nandkeshwar, Aged about 55 years (actual age 18 yrs) Atl above Caste Koir, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. village Karanji, P.S. & Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (CG) Ranment Wd/o Nandkeshwar, Aged about 55 years, Caste Koir, Occupation Agriculturist, P.S. & Tahsil Ambikapur, Disttrict Surguja (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Surguja (CG) Hirodia W/o. Late Nandkeshwar, Aged about 75 years, Caste Koir, Occupation Agriculturist R/o Village Karanji, P.S. & Tahsil Ambikapur, Distt Surguja (CG) Ramkumari W/o Laxman, Aged about 45 years, Caste Koir, Occupation Agricuiturist, R/o. Village Girjapur, P.S. Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, Distt. Surguja (CG) & Village Karanji, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) Present: Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sanjay S Agrawal, iearned Govt. Advocate for the State ofChhattisgarh. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 2Sm April, 200S) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I do not find any jurisdictional flaw or material irregularity or faiture ofjustice. The petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No f'»ata—— Sd/- Chief Justice ,^