In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-19773 of 2009 (O&M) Shri Anurag Patial ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. N. S. Shekhawat, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. On 23.7.2009, the following order was passed by this court:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited in which the petitioner is working as a Manager had financed two trucks owned by the complainant. He was a defaulter in repayment of the installments for both the loans. On November 8, 2008, possession of one of the truck bearing registration No. PB-10- BJ-7618 was taken peacefully after informing the police about the same. On November 14, 2008, complainant filed a suit for permanent injunction seeking restrain against the finance company and also impleading the petitioner as one of the defendants seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein from forcibly taking the possession of the second Truck bearing registration No. HR-45-9614. In that suit there is no mention of forcible possession of the truck, earlier on November 8, 2008. The FIR was registered against the petitioner nearly eight months after the possession of the truck was taken. The effort is only to harass the petitioner.” It is not disputed that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. The truck in question which was allegedly sold by the finance company has also been recovered by the police. Be that as it may, without recording any finding on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 23.7.2009 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. 4.8.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge