IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 12630 of 2008 Between: Bete Durga Rao S/o.Laxmaiah R/o.Mulugalampalli, Jeelugumilli (M), West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, West Godavari District Eluru. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District. 3 The Tahsildar, Jeelugumilli (M), W.G. District. 4 Malladi Satyanarayana Chakravathy S/o.Late Ramabraham R/o.Mulagalampalli (V) Jeelugumilli (M) West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 not taking action against 4th respondent with regard to the bogus pattadar pass book and adangal copies relating to the land to an exten t of Ac. 3.34 cents in R.S.No. 181/3 situated at Rowthumgudem Village of Jeelugumilli (M) of West Godavari District, is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to cancel the bogus pattadar pass book and adangal copies of the 4th respondents and to pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 12630 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that he is the absolute owner of the land in an extent of Ac.3.34 cents situated in R.S. No. 181/3 of Rowthugudem village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District. The case of the petitioner is that when he came to know about respondent No.4 obtaining bogus pattadar passbook and adangal copies in respect of the above said land, he made a representation dated 05.11.2007 requesting respondent Nos.1 to 3 to cancel the said fake pattadar passbook and adangal copies, and though respondent No.1-District Collector made an endorsement on the said representation directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take necessary action in the matter, but till date no action had been taken by respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 05.11.2007 of the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 18.06.2008 Ksr/Nsr