In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 787 of 2009 Date of decision: March 31, 2009 Harprabhjit Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Vinod Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate with Ms. Samapati Chugh, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J Though, the defendants were provided adequate opportunity to lead evidence, however, the plea set up by the defendant-petitioner is that Harprabhjit Singh petitioner being minor was not provided any opportunity. Certainly, when one of the defendant was minor and represented by his Guardian Sukhwant Singh, then he must have been provided opportunity. Thus, in order to impart complete justice between the parties, this revision petition is accepted, impugned order is set aside and trial court is directed to provide opportunity to the minor to lead evidence. However, it is directed that the minor-defendant will close his evidence within two months from today and no further date, after two months, shall be given. March 31, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge