IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.229 of 2011 JACKKY KUMAR @ JAI KISHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 13.05.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is declared juvenile in conflict with law. He is facing charge punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code along with other family members. Learned counsel highlights from the prosecution case that owing to illicit relationship of the victim with cousin sister of the petitioner the occurrence is said to have been committed. It is submitted that he is in custody/remand home since 11.05.2010. A supplementary affidavit has been filed today stating therein that own uncle of the petitioner would take entire responsibilities respecting the petitioner, if released on bail. Considering the background in which the occurrence is said to have been committed as also the fact that he is in custody since 11.05.2010 and there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner, this Court, while setting aside the order(s), directs release of the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Patna City in connection with J.J.B. case no. 142 of 2010, arising out of Danapur P.S. case no. 129 of 2010, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own uncle of 2 the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the said bailor to monitor the conduct/behavior of the petitioner and to produce him in Court in person as and when required therefor. In case of default in such appearance, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. (iii) During subsistency of the present privilege of bail, if it is found that petitioner has involved himself in another criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of the condition of bail entailing cancellation. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)