WP(C) 4102/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N.SARMA Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner as projected in this writ petition is that he wa s allotted with certain contractual works by the respondent authorities, more pa rticularly, the respondent No. 4 which was, according to him successfully execut ed. An amount of Rs. 1,39,587/- is still due to him on account of the aforesaid contractual works. It is contended that in spite of repeated request, the afores aid amount has not been paid to him by the respondent authorities and hence he h as approached this Court by filing this writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar claim of the petitio ner as agitated in his petition has been dealt with by the Full Bench of this Co urt in the case of (Tamsher Ali vs. State of Assam) reported in 2008(4) GLT page 1. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that the case of the petitioner shall be deal with by the respond ent authorities in accordance with the directions and observations made in the c ase of Tamsher Ali(supra) as referred to above and similar relief granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid case shall also be granted to the present petition er entitled under the law.