BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirty First day of January Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.1200 of 2011 1 MARIMUTHU 2 MURUGAN .. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 7 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTI EAST POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT CR NO. 45/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.MAYIL VAHANA RAJENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.RAJENDRAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner are arrayed as A1 & A7 and they were remanded to judicial custody on 13.01.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 306 I.P.C. and Section 9 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Ordinance Act 2003, in Crime No.45 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.Heard Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Rajendran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged offence as stated in the complaint. He further submitted that the co-accused in this case had already been released on anticipatory bail by the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.772 of 2011, dated 22.01.2011. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would oppose the bail application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the co-accused in this case had already been released on anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Kovilpatti,and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for investigation. Sd/- 31/01/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I KOVILPATTI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTI EAST POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5 THE OFFICER IN CHARGE SUB JAIL, KOVILPATTI +1. CC to M/S. C.MAYIL VAHANA RAJENDRAN Advocate SR.No.3470 ssk/03.02.2011 /7c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1200 of 2011 Date :31/01/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/