C.W.P.No 8733 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No 8733 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.3.2011 South City-II Residents Welfare Association & others .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate, for Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, the petitioners Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. Vikas Behl, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4 RANJAN GOGOI, CJ. : (Oral) C.M.No.3829 of 2011 Allowed subject to just exceptions. Written statement alongwith annexures is taken on record. C.W.P.No.8733 of 2010 The challenge in the writ petition is against an order dated 10.2.2010 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Director, Town and Country Planning under Section 8 of the Haryana Development and Regulations Urban Areas Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The impugned order dated 10.2.2010 has been passed pursuant to the directions issued by this court by order dated 22.7.2009 in C.W.P. No. 8797 of 2009 preferred by the petitioners. The order challenged in the writ petition is appealable under C.W.P.No 8733 of 2010 2 the provisions of Section 19 of the Act. In fact in the order dated 22.7.2009 in C.W.P. No. 8797 of 2009 it was observed that the party aggrieved by the order to be passed by the Director may seek remedies against the same in appropriate proceedings. As an appropriate remedy has been provided under the Act and the order challenged is an appealable order, we do not find how the said order can be examined by us in the present PIL. The PIL is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy under the Act, if so advised. (RANJAN GOGOI) CHIEF JUSTICE (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE March 14, 2011 RSK NOTE: Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not? _____