1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (s) NO: 562 /2009 IN SECOND APPEAL (st)NO.14989/2007(Rej.S.A. No.66/2008) (Krushna Bhiva Borkar and another vs. Bhiva Borkar and another ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. N N Motghare, Adv.for applicant/s Miss Shilpa O Tapadiya, Adv.h/for Mr Quazi for R-1 and 2 CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : July 21, 2010. Heard. According to the applicants they did not inform their address at Indore to their counsel and since there was no communication between their Advocate and applicants they could not know about dismissal of their appeal in the lower Appellate Court. The applicants had gone to Indore to earn their livelihood for about 2 years and had not communicated their address to the Advocate. It is submitted that the delay was not intentional or deliberate but due to bona fide reasons, enumerated herein-above. 2. The request has been objected tooth and nail by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on the ground that the delay is inordinate and the reasons given in the application are after-thought and flimsy. Be that as it may; considering the reasons stated in the application I am inclined to condone the delay subject to payment of costs of Rs. 500/- payable to 2 learned Advocate for respondents. Delay is condoned. Civil Application is accordingly allowed. JUDGE Sahare