IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33821 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR SRIVASTVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 3.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It would appear from the complaint petition that marriage of the petitioner was settled with daughter of the complainant but, subsequently, mother of the petitioner demanded Rs 5 lakhs in dowry and when the aforesaid demand was not fulfilled, petitioner as well as his other family members refused to solemnize the marriage with the complainant’s daughter. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner( Santosh Kumar Srivastva) in the event of arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no. 166 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))