IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9575 of 2008 MOST.PHOOLO DEVI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.5.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The allegation against the petitioner no.1 is that she asked the victim girl to accompany her towards the field. So far as the petitioner no.2 is concerned, it is alleged that he was also present at the time when the victim girl was kidnapped. The girl was recovered and she has given her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which she supported the part of kidnapping but does not allege rape against the petitioner no.2. In the statement she has stated that there is a land dispute between Jawahar Lal Rai and her family members. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that so far as the petitioner no.1 is concerned, she has no role in the occurrence. With respect to petitioner no.2, it has been submitted that Jawahar Lal Rai, this petitioner and Hira Lal Rai are brothers and it appears that they have been made accused because of the land dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Hira Lal Rai has already been granted bail by this court vide Cr.Misc.No.15294 of 2006 on 15.5.2006. Be that as it may, the petitioners, Most. Phoolo Devi and Garib Lal Rai are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of the C. J. M. Khagaria in connection with Allauli P.S.Case No. 43 of 2005. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)