HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT ?ET1TION (S) N0. 901 0f2009 PETITIONER : Ramlal Singh S/o Hira Sai, Aged about 38 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Kesma, R/o Udaipur, Distt. Surguja (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through ~— The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dim. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Surguja, Distt. $urguja (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Oificer, Uciaipur, Surguja, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn’. J. Present: Shri Bhupendra Singh, t dvocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State/respondents. is entitled to grant of two increments as he has obtained D.Ed. certificate on his own expenses during the service period. Learned counsel nirther/s/ubrnits’ttiat the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to the authorities for grant of two increments pursuant to the judgment and ortier passed by this Court in the matter of Yasizwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anotherl and W.Pt(S.) No.4130 of 2005, Gopesh Knmar Verma vs. The State Govt. ofChhamsgarh and another. ‘7‘ \1 2006 (II) MFJR CG 96 \_\ ORAL ORDER (Fassed on Wtary, 2009) Witti the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. f; 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner C The Sta e Govemxnent is under an obiigation to follow ths 1aw settled by this Court and it is not necassaxy to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has already been setiled by this Court. The employees, who are simiiarly situated and have not approached the Court; may be treated at par with other employees, who have approached this Court. It is not necessary to approach this Couxt for similar order. In View of the foregoing reasons, this petition stahds disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner, on the request of learned counsel, to make a representation. ifthe representation is filed by the petitioner, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law on its own merit as expeditiously as possible, preferably Within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. g