CRM No. M 22349 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 22349 of 2010 Date of decision: 09.09.2010 Sunil ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. T S Sangha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 487 dated 09.12.2009 under Sections 363, 366, 368, 376 (g), 386, 120-B of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palwal. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that from the allegation levelled in the FIR, if at all, it is an offence only under Section 497, 498 of Indian Penal Code and definitely not under Section 376 IPC. It is also pointed out from the order dated 09.03.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal that the complainant's wife i.e. the CRM No. M 22349 of 2010 2 prosecutrix had filed her affidavit stating therein that she had made a wrong statement before the Magistrate under 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to fear of her husband who had threatened to divorce her in case she did not make statement of his choice. Thus, the question of consent cannot be ruled out at this stage. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palwal. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 09,2010 mohan