IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS No. 538 of 2008 Smt. Ganga Devi and another. …..Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. …………Respondents. Ms. Shruti, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents. 18th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Both the parties have given their consent for deciding the present petition finally. 2. By means of present writ petition, petitioners have prayed for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to relieve the petitioner for the State of U.P. forthwith. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the writ petition, counter and rejoinder affidavits. 4. Admittedly, the petitioners have been allocated to the State of Uttar Pradesh. 5. Since the petitioners have been allocated to the State of Uttar Pradesh, therefore, respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners to the State of Uttar Pradesh within a period one month form the date of production of the certified of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of finally along with the Urgency Application No. 2219 of 2008. (P.C. Verma, J.) 18.9.2008 Rathour