THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.C. No. 315 of 2011 Oral order: The petitioner, alleging that the respondents have violated the orders dated 12.11.2010 passed by this in W.P. No. 28242 of 2010, filed this contempt case, praying the Court to punish the respondents for contempt. Pursuant to the notice ordered by this Court, respondent No.3 filed counter stating that earlier they conducted route survey and found that the length of the rout was 303.14 Kms. and not 312.2 Kms. as claimed by the petitioner. However, in obedience to the order of this Court and based on the instructions of respondent No.1, they once again conducted route survey on 02.08.2011 in the presence of the person authorized by the petitioner, and in the said survey, the route length was found to 301.91 Kms., and that after obtaining necessary approval, respondent No. 4 passed order on 31.05.2011 holding that the petitioner is entitled to hire charges for 302.7 Kms. and not for 312.2 Kms., as claimed by him, and that the said order was also communicated to the petitioner, which was acknowledged by him on 09.06.2011. Since respondent No.3 in compliance of the order of this Court, passed orders dated 31.05.2011, nothing survives for consideration in the contempt case, and the same is accordingly closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 31.05.2011, if he so, chooses, in separate proceedings. No cots. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 2nd September, 2011 KSR