RSA No.154 of 2010 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.154 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.05.2010 The Sonepat Hindu Educational & Charitable Society through its authorised representative/Manager and another. .. Appellants Versus Sh.Hari Parkash Mangla and others. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.V.K.Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr.J.K.Bhatti, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate for the caveators. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) At the very outset learned Senior Counsel for the appellants has stated that the appellants would have no objection in inducting the respondent-plaintiffs as life members as per the Regulations of the Society but they are only aggrieved against the omnibus direction that even those persons who have not come to the Court should be inducted as life members. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-plaintiffs states that in fact, the claim of the plaintiffs was restricted to their own membership but the learned Court below directed the appellants to induct other persons also since it was an equitable order. In my opinion, in view of the agreement between the parties, this appeal can be disposed of with the direction that the appellant shall consider and induct the rest of the plaintiff-respondents for induction of life members as per their Rules and Regulations and pass necessary orders within a period RSA No.154 of 2010 (O & M) ::2:: of one month and in any case before the next election to the Managing Committee take place. As regards the omnibus direction, I find that the same cannot be justified. This, of course, does not mean that other persons like the plaintiff-respondents do not have the right to be considered for membership. In this regard also learned Senior Counsel for the appellants states that any other person who is eligible and who is ready to fulfill the conditions of membership and approach the Society would be considered in normal course. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. The judgments and decrees of the Courts below are modified accordingly. Since the main appeal has been decided, the civil miscellaneous application, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Copy of this judgment be given dasti on payment. May , 2010 (AJAY TEWARI) Sukhpreet JUDGE