IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 22475 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 2.9.2011 Pankaj Shukla .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. A perusal of the FIR shows that petitioner here-in has admitted his guilt before the complainant, regarding forging of certain bills, the sales pertaining to which had not been accounted for. However, subsequently more shortage of stock was found in the show room, which was being managed by the petitioner. Considering the earlier admission of the petitioner, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 2.9.2011 Judge Meenu