IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-11203 of 2010 Date of Decision:16.8.2010 Binni @ Kuldeep Kumar and others .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Petitioners No.2 and 3 are seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.20 dated 21.1.2010 registered under Sections 382 IPC at Police Station City Sangrur, District Sangrur. On 20.4.2010, the interim bail was granted to the petitioners subject to their joining investigation as and when required by the police. On 1.7.2010, it was brought to the notice that petitioners No.2 and 3 have not joined the investigation and petitioner No.1 has been arrested and released on regular bail by the trial Court. Accordingly, the present petition qua petitioner No.1 was dismissed as rendered infructuous and one last opportunity was granted to petitioners No.2 and 3 to join the investigation and case was adjourned to 13.8.2010. On 13.8.2010, learned State counsel on instructions from HC Raghuwinder Singh stated that petitioners No.2 and 3 have still not joined the investigation and learned counsel for the petitioners prayed for time to seek instructions and verify the said fact. CRM M-11203 of 2010 -2- Today, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no instructions. Accordingly, the concession of anticipatory bail cannot be extended to petitioners No.2 and 3. Dismissed. 16.8.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE