@D Page NOj. (WV IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. é‘ 13 f WP NO /2004 PETITIONER : Dr. Shahid Khan S/o. Shri Irshad Ahamad Khan, aged about 31 years Unani Medical Officer, Government Unani Dispensary Jagdalpur, Distt. Baster (C.G.) tate of Chhatlsgar Thrug S th oh the Secretary Phc Health 2; ‘ ub 8 5 *’ famly Welfare d Medical ‘ Education epartment Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Madhya Pradeh Through the Secretary Public Health 85 family Welfare and Medical Education Department Valab Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.). 3. Te h Secretary, General Administration epartment (G.A.D.) and State Reorganisati cell Wallabh Bhawan, Bhopal . (M.P.) ‘4‘ Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pension Personnel and Training Departmen New Delh 5 D1rector of Indian System of “\ Me1c1nes and Homeopathy, Old Nurse Hostel Rl (C ) s agur G WRIT PETITION UDNER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner above named beg to submlt as under:— 0 1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As mentioned in the cause title. ‘ EQ$¢KV Z Versus v0 - l an D s h D on , t i Y d // XI~HC<22 > r m g w‘gg‘m- m3 20W mm V 200 of India, the petitioner has eubmitted that though he has been allocated to the State of Madhya Pradesh tmt he is not being relieved. He relied on judgments of this Court in W.P.No.516/2003 (Dr. Ashck Kumar Jain 8s Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh > & Ors.) dated 17.12.2003 and in W.P.No.152/2004 (Dr. Shiv Dayal Shamere vs State of .Qhhatdsgarh' .8; 0rs.), copies ofwhieh‘have Men med along with the petition as Annexures P— 14 and P— 16. This fact is‘not disputed by the other side. Having considered the facts and circumstances, material on record and in view of the judgnentssitw above and runner the legal position, the acti n of the State authorities in not [Hie éfad m \ Wat m m W ww WW mmmm WWWW 13‘6 WIT a? mu 311%?! 21.04.2004 Shri Subhash Yadav, unsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay S. Agaw , Panel Lawyer for the State. None for respondents 0.2 and 3. Service to them is not required as no relief is c ' ed from them. Service to them is dispensed with. Shri Vinjay Harit, Sn tanding Counsel with Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Addl. Standing unsel for Union of India and its omcials. Application for urgent caring is allowed. Heard. By this petition under ' 'clc 226/277 of the Constitution ;k{rmwi4rs§m£m?é% “W ‘ I '