IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19947 of 2010 1. BALSHARAN YADAV, SON OF SHANICHAR YADAV 2. RAMANANDAN YADAV 3. RAJO YADAV 4. BHUSHAN YADAV 5. LALAK YADAV ALL SONS OF BALSHARAN YADAV 6. CHAMELI DEVI, WIFE OF BALSHARAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners No. 1 and 6 are the parents-in-law of the deceased whereas the petitioners No. 2 to 5 are brothers-in-law of the deceased. The allegation against the petitioners is that they had committed the death of the daughter of the Informant for reasons of dowry. However, after investigation, final report was submitted against the petitioners and charge sheet was submitted only against the husband of the deceased who when put on trial, was acquitted of charges since none of the prosecution witnesses supported the case of prosecution. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 40 of 2004, they shall 2 be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case they fail to do so, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled, (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to the cancelled. S. Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)