IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.966 of 2009 Between: Praveen Kumar Chauhan S/o. Late Mooraji Chauhan R/o. H.No.8-3-60/301, Lalji Compound, Old Beet Bazar, Warangal. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Inthashargung Police Station, Warangal. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Warangal Town, Warangal. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal District, Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in not conducting the enquiry of the petitioner’s complaint dt. 08.12.2008 and the representation dt. 29.12.2008, that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the respondents to conduct a proper enquiry in to the complaint dt.08.12.2008 lodged by the petitioner before the 1st respondent with the competent authority. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.966 OF 2009 ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. Heard the learned Government Pleader for Home. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he lodged a complaint dated 08.12.2008 before the 1st respondent- Sub Inspector of Police, Inthashargunj Police Station, Warangal, copy of which was marked to the 2nd respondent- Deputy Superintendent of Police, Warangal Town, complaining that some persons have been trying to trespass into the lands belonging to him and his brothers, but no action was taken thereon by the 1st respondent, in spite of the directions of the 2nd respondent to enquire into the matter and take necessary action as per law. Therefore, the petitioner and his brothers submitted a representation to the Hon’ble Minister for Home, Andhra Pradesh, on 29.12.2008, ventilating their grievances, and the Hon’ble Minister made an endorsement thereon directing the 3rd respondent- Superintendent of Police, Warangal, to get the matter enquired into, but even then no action has been taken. Hence, this writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents to conduct proper enquiry into the complaint dated 08.12.2008 lodged by the petitioner before the 1st respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to conduct enquiry and take necessary action on the complaint dated 08.12.2008 lodged by the petitioner before the 1st respondent. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 27th January, 2009 IBL