'1rTJJ ^ i( ^»^.,<<?> ^- THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^zz yes ^;^fe.^.<"'ii ' &atg^['s.i.] ( ){ ^v^ / /^/• '^;^/- -^/y %/y z^y'^ NON-APPLICANTS 1. Ku. Anis Fatma, D/o. Basharat Aged about 32 years. 2. Saiyad Zulfequar AU, S/o. Basharat, Aged about 42 years. 3. Saiyad Wakar Ali, S/o. Basharat, •" Aged about 50 years. 4. Saiyad Jafar Ali, S/o. Basharat, Aged about 55 years. 5. Saiyad SarvarAli, S/o. Basharat, Aged about 56 years. 6. Saiyad Istakar Ali, S/o. Basharat, Aged about 46 years. 7. Saiyad Jakir Ali, S/o. Basharat, Aged about 39 years. 8. Saiyad Shakir Ali, S/o. Basharat, Aged about 36 years. All are R/o. Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil 8s District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh State Wakf Through: Chief Executive Chhattisgarh State Wakf -! 3. Wakf Commission, Raipur (C.G.j 4. AbdulLatif, S/o. Abdul Rauf. 5. Mohd. Aslak Khan, S/o. Alam 6. Saiyad Karar Ali, S/o. Iniam Ali, Aged about 62 years. 7. Saiyad Makarad Ali, S/o. Imam Ali, Aged about 54 years. 8. Saiyad Najim Ali, S/o. Imam Ali, Aged about 52 years. 9. Saiyad Kajira Ali, S/o. Imam Ali, Aged about 52 years. T?espondent No.4 to 9 are resident of Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.). 10. Chhattisgarh Wakf Tribunal, Raipur. si^i w Ww tI!TT 3TT^?t sh+li^ ^ + *11*1dl (b*l!^t ~S^ ^iqicl^, E?TfrOT?, fsRTCTy: ..h.c^...M.?.:...6.'2-.5-z?^1 / 3II^?T'(T5RT ('^3^tT) ?^<iiw ^fro sn^i S.B: 'BLE MR.JUSTICE N 16, .2011 +l'Ml^41-1 -WRff ^' TS^t {fa^K ^aiRltian^i ;. AGARWAC ounsel for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Mr. Sanjeev Agrawa!, PL ^or the State. ~^. Counsei forthe petitioner^ Is heard on restoration appiication. The [iiioners are se No. 17/2009 which was dismlss .-^-a*-'^ ^ff Q '^f'^'t 4 Ueal.cu .^Q.O^U) i On due consideraSlon of for the petitioners and the grot am satlsfied fhat the absence o when CMI Revision No.17/200i on bona fide grounds. iVi.L..^ N0.17/2C . No. 627/2011, th 009 is restored to its or ^king restoration of Civ'il Revision i^d for want of prosecution 'v'ide order |he submission of the learned counsel f~ids taken In the restoration pctition, She petitioners' counse! on 26.8.201 1 was taken-up for hearing vras based ^refore, is allovved and Civil Revioior Binai numoci. Sd/- N-K. Agarwa! Judge