WP(C) 4915/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Dr. B Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B D Goswami , learned counsel for the respondent Bank. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of alleged non-payment of salary for the period from 1st November, 2004 to 30th June, 2005. Mr. Goswami, l earned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner is not entitled to receive salary for the said period as he did not join the place of posting and remained absent unauthorisedly. On the other hand, Dr. B Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the orders in question were interfered by this Court, the petitioner is entitled to receive salary. Without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the petition is dis posed of by directing the respondent Bank to pass a speaking order dealing with the grievance of the petitioner. Whatever may be the outcome of the examination of the case of the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to him. Let the en tire exercise be carried out as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 31s t December, 2010. Let a copy of this order be furnished to Mr. B D Goswami, learned counse l representing the respondent Bank.