IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 6334 of 2011 Date of decision : 08.04.2011 ASI Daya Nand No.1792/FBD ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Karamveer Singh Banyana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) Heard. Notice of motion be issued to respondent Nos. 1 to 4. At this stage, Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana accepts notices on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4.. The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, the petitioner has moved representation (Annexure P-2) and legal notice (Annexure P-3), but no decision has yet been taken by the Director General of Police, Haryana (respondent No.2). After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2, to decide the representation (Annexure P-2) filed and legal notice (Annexure P-3) issued by the petitioner and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. April 08, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge