1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU Writ Petition (MD)No.87 of 2011 G.Narasimma Perumal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirumangalam. 3.Annakkodi, Sub Inspector of Police, Kalligudi Police Station, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 4.R.Venkatraman ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering the civil matter and peaceful possession and enjoyment and title of the petitioner's property bearing patta No.632 and Survey No.283/13 with extent of 0.29.0 at K.Vellakulam Bit 1 , Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Baskaran For Respondents 1-3 : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader For 4th Respondent : Mr.S.Muniyandi ORDER This writ petition has been filed forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering the civil matter and disturbing peaceful possession and enjoyment and title of the petitioner's property bearing patta No.632 and Survey No.283/13 with extent of 0.29.0 at K.Vellakulam Bit 1, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 2. When the matter came up on 05.1.2011, this Court was ordered notice of motion returnable by 24.01.2011. Subsequently, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 fourth respondent was served. But insofar as the respondents 1 to 3 are concerned, the petitioner has not filed any process fee. Therefore, when the matter came up on 28.02.2011, this Court extended the time till 31.03.2011 to comply with the office defect, failing which, the writ petition has to be dismissed as against the unserved respondents. Though the matter called subsequently, Registry made an endorsement that no process fee has been filed till 31.03.2011. Hence, by self working order, the writ petition against respondents 1 to 3 has been dismissed. Since the petitioner prayer is against the respondents 2 and 3, and the writ petition against the respondents 1 to 3 has already been dismissed which has not been set aside by this Court, the relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted by this Court. Even otherwise, the petitioner can always file a appropriate civil proceedings to secure his interest in the property in question. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirumangalam. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kalligudi Police Station, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 4.Tirumangalam Traffic Police, Tirumangalam Town, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. +1 CC to Mr.S.Muniyandi, Advocate (SR.No.37968) Writ Petition (MD)No.87 of 2011 01.11.2011 sms NSV/15.11.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/