1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:07.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.10133 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Sooriyan Recreation Club represented by its Secretary A.Selvakumar. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Royappanpatty Police Station, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the lawful functions of the petitioner Club without any complaint or due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Guhan For Respondents: Mr.TR.Janarthanam Additional Government Pleader. O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from interfering with the lawful functions of the petitioner Club without any complaint or due process of law. 2. Heard Mr.K.Guhan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.TR.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner claims to be running a club and has given a representation to the Superintendent of Police/first respondent on 09.07.2011 alleging that the subordinate officers are interfering with the affairs of the club. Since the said representation has not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the Superintendent of Police will consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. 6. In view of the nature of relief sought for by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.07.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioner's claim and the Authority shall decide the matter on its own merits. 7. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Royappanpatty Police Station, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. +1cc to Mr.K.Guhan, Advocate, SR.No.30393 ss1 GH : 15.09.2011 : 2p/5c W.P(MD)No.10133 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 07.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/