IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29613 of 2008 PAPPU KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.8.2008 Heard. The lady appears 18 years of age as per medical opinion also and she was married to one Sanjay Yadav as appears from her statement recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. But she also states that she has married the present petitioner Pappu Kumar Jha in a temple out of her own will and she had herself gone with him as she has already married to him and that she had neither been enticed or taken away. The contention is that under the facts and circumstances of the case it could not be an offence under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code rather it could be an offence under secrtion 498A of the Indian Penal Code which is bailable. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of the lady and the contention, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3,000/-(Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Katihar (M) P.S. case no.43 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha, J )