P€titioners Respondents Versus / BILASPUR / / M WP NO §Z48/ 2035 Jeetanram ‘S/o $hn‘ Goverdhan Ram, Agéd about 33 years, R/o Village Sarma, Tehsil — Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) Kariman Singh S/o Shri Sohan Singh, Aged about 29 years, R/ o Village Lanchi, Tehsil — Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) Hirdevlal Prajapati, S/o Shri Atwari Ram, Aged about 27 years, R/o Dhartipara, Tehsil — Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) Sahal Singh, S/o Mohan Singh, Aged about 30 years, R/o Village Masira, Tehsil — Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja—(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Principal Secretarv Department of Food and Civil ’Supplies and Consumer Protection y Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur—(C.G.) The Collector, (Food) Sarguja, Dist : Sarguja — (C.G.) The Food Officer, Surajpur, Dist:Sarguja—(C.G;) Sub Divisional Officer, Surajpur, Dist : Sarguja— (C.G.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT (2) WRIT PETITION UVDER ARTICLES 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA msrm (13W) mzoo mmm 311231 ‘Wm'arfwm aswma ‘ ‘ Pixiggaggngm ’ hri A.K. Patnaik, C.J. ’b Shri Sunil Kumar Sin .-5. the parties. Heard learned counsel for The questions raised in tr rais in Writ Petition Nosi 445 o‘. of 2005, 518 of 2005, 215G of 1 2600 of 2005 in which Judgment This case is also dispoeec delivered today. ha, J. iis writ petition are the same as those 2005, 578 of 2005, 1034 of 2005. 1558 2005, 2316 of 2005, i397 of 2005 and was been delivered today. of in terms of the aforesaid Judgment Sdl- “Sxunil Kumar Sinha e Judge Honble S & Honle 0509200 ad 1