IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 221 of 2011(O) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OPC.236/2011 Dated 23/02/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- MATHAI PAULOSE, KEETTALIL HOUSE, PLAMUDY.P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, REPRESENTED BY SUBASH.K.P., AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. MATHAI PAULOSE, KEETTALIL HOUSE, PLAMUDY.P.O. KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM OFFICE AT CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD-682030. BY G.P.SRI.T.K.SAJEEV. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ R.P.No.221 OF 2011 IN O.P.(C) No.236 OF 2011 ------------------------------ Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 ORDER The Original Petition was dismissed as infructuous, recording the submission made by the learned Government Pleader. At that time, there was no representation for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this Review Petition seeking to review the judgment dated 23rd February,2011 dismissing the Original Petition as infructuous. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it would appear that the Original Petition had not become infructuous. Therefore, the judgment dated 23rd February, 2011 is erroneous and it is liable to be corrected by allowing the Review Petition. Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed and the judgment R.P.No.221 OF 2011 IN 2 O.P.(C) No.236 OF 2011 dated 23rd February, 2011 is reviewed. Post the Original Petition on 20.6.2011. Call for the records from the Lower Court. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms