^, ^ ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Civil Revision No. 2-^- QF 2010 APPLICANT DEFENDANT , ^v^^ ^^- % ^ _...- ^ .yP' ^.M^'' ^'>*•••" Versus NON-APPLICANTS : 1 PLAINTIFFS 2. 3. Hori Lal Pandey, S/0 Shriram Pandey, aged about 64 years, Retired Bank Officer, R/0 Ward No. 19, Clubpara, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) Smt. Dharmin Chandrakar, W/0 Daulal Chandrakar, aged about 58 years. Lavesh Chandrakar, aged about 34 years, S/0 Daulal Chandrakar. Naresh Chandrakar, aged about 29 years, S/0 Daulal Chandrakar. Ramsheela Chandrakar, aged about 43 years, W/0 Sunder Chandrakar. Ravikant Chandrakar, aged about 28 years, S/0 Sunder Chandrakar. it\.^ 6. ^ Gagan Chandrakar, aged about 26 years, S/0 Sunder Chandrakar. 7. Shyamlal Chandrakar aged about 50years, S/OJagnu Chandrakar. 8. ^ 9. 9(A) 9(B) 9(C) L '^ 10. Surendra Chandrakar, aged about 45 years, S/0 Jagnuram Chandrakar. Tikeshwar Chandrakar (died), Smt. Jaya Devi Chandrakar, W/o Late Shri Tikeshwar Chandrakar aged about 30 years, Kanta Chandrakar D/o Late Shri Tikeshwar Chandrakar, aged about10years, N^rendra Chandrakar, S/o Late Shri Tikeshwar Chandrakar, aged about 8 years, Respondent No. 9 (B) & (C) are minor through they are natural guardian mother Smt. Jaya Devi Kamlesh Chandrakar, aged about 38 years. S/0 Jagnuram Chandrakar, All are By Caste- Chandrakar, R/0 Vijlage-Mahasamund, Tahsil & District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) -^- 11. State of Chhattisgarh, through Coltector, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 3iT^T ^R? ^icb ^T ^ni^r sb^jicb F/ NWCTt S^HKIl T^ ^iqi^l^ ^Tll^^Ko, f®j^11^^< C-^ (^0^^7/1 <=> "^ 200 ^f^f ^w ('<3?rf33^) ^KIIW t<%a ^^ SB; HON. JUSTICE 3 16-3-2010 Shri Awaclh Tripathi, A<| Shri Tripafhi oeeks to raise all the questions in the Liberty as prayed for is| With the aforesaid U1 witlidrawu. However, it is dii| applicant is raisiag liere, are| the trial Court shall decid^ accordance with law OB. it owji P.v. for tlie applicant. ^vithdraw this • revision wifh Mberty to l^ritteii statenient. Igraated, ^erty, the revision is disaiissed as |ected tliat if the questioiis whicli the raised io. fhe written statement, tlien ^ tlie saine aiter iraoiiiig issues iii inents. QM^I<yi<i1Ti 'HR^f ^ 'fe^st <S^i^i< ^? 3?RfH 371^1 ?.K. AGARWAL Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge ^ffirf^r ^^ S^TOW, <R-'if<?TF?-^-FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000.