IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2010 / 29TH ASHADHA 1932 LA.App..No. 794 of 2010 (C) -------------------------------- LAR.77/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.P.N.SUMANGALA RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS --------------------------------- 1. BHARGAVI AMMA RADHAMANI AMMA, REGHUNATHA MANDIRAM, PANAYAM, KOLLAM, PIN-691 601. 2. PRASANTH, S/O.RADHAMONY AMMA, REGHUNATHA MANDIRAM, PANAYAM, KOLLAM, PIN-691 601. 3. PRIYANKA, D/O.RADHAMONI AMMA, REGHUNATHA MANDIRAM, PANAYAM, KOLLAM, PIN-691 601. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.794 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Even though Smt.P.N.Sumangala, the learned Government Pleader assailed the impugned judgment very strongly, we do not find justification for entertaining this appeal. The property was in Panayam village. The acquisition was for the purpose of formation of Railway Track between Kollam and Kayamkulam. The relevant Section 4(1) was published on 07/07/91. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the rate of Rs.6,293/- per Are. The Reference Court enhanced the same to Rs.18,525/- per Are. L. A. A. No.794 of 2010 -2- 2. Having gone through the impugned judgment, we feel that the Government or the Railway cannot have any legitimate grievance regarding the enhancement made under the impugned judgment. We are not inclined to admit this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/-