1 rpw-lod-64-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LOD) NO.64 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2293 OF 2011 Kamala L. Chinkendi & Ors .. Petitioners versus The Administrator & Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Y.E.Mooman with Ms.M.B.Gawde for the petitioners. Mr.G.W.Mattos, A.G.P for the State of Maharashtra-respondent No.1A. Mr.Chirag Balsara a/w Ms.Sheetal Angre & Mr.S.Shaikh i/by Divya Shah Associate for respondent No.4. Mrs.T.H.Puranik for B.M.C-respondent No.2. Mr.J.G.Reddy with Mr.N.P.Zatte for SRA. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 23rd November 2011. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Mooman in support of this review petition. Perused the review petition and the order of which review is sought. Upon a perusal of the petition and after hearing Mr.Mooman, I do not find any case made out and particularly under section 114 read with Order XLVII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, enabling this Court to exercise its review jurisdiction. The review petition is, therefore, devoid of any merits and it is rejected. 2 rpw-lod-64-11.doc 2} It is contended on behalf of Mr.Balsara and Mr.Mattos that in the review petition, certain allegations are made against the advocates. It is not necessary to enter into any larger controversy and particularly when on instructions, Mr.Balsara makes a statement that agreements for permanent alternate accommodation executed with the applicants- original petitioners would be lodged for registration with the Registration Authority on 25th November 2011 at 11.00 a.m. In the light of this statement and even the petitioners being permitted in law to admit the execution of the documents at the time of registration of the same, there is no need to exercise any review jurisdiction. Review petition is, therefore, dismissed. 3} Heard Mr.Mattos. Perused the application for seeking extension of time. In the light of the administrative difficulties expressed by Mr.Mattos, the time to take decision in terms of the order dated 21st October 2011 is extended by a period of four months from 21st October 2011. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)