In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Civil Revision No.6219 of 2006 ..... Date of decision: 1.12.2006 Sunil Bhambri .....Petitioners v. Shakuntla Devi .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. ..... S.S. Saron, J. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner who is present in Court, states that the petitioner may be granted one year's time upto 31.12.2007 to vacate the demised premises. Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate appearing for the respondent states that she has no objection to the grant of time provided the petitioner gives necessary undertaking that he would vacate the demised premises within the time fixed and hand over vacant possession to the respondent-landlady. Mr. Chetan Mittal undertakes to vacate the demised premises by 31.12.2007. He has also assured that the arrears of rent, if any, would be paid and would be continued to be paid to the respondent-landlady. C.R. No.6219/2006 [2] In view of the fair stand adopted by the learned counsel for the parties, the present revision petition is dismissed. However, the order under revision shall remain in abeyance till 31.12.2007 by which time the petitioner shall vacate the demised premises and hand over vacant possession to the respondent-landlady. Besides, the petitioner shall pay the arrears of rent, if any, and continue to pay the same till he vacates the premises or till 31.12.2007 as the case may be. December 1, 2006. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*