1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.55 OF 2011. RAJU BHAYA @ SHANKAR RAJPUT VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHER ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. By post. Mrs. Nandita Tripathi, APP for respondents. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 21st JANUARY 2011. 1. This is a letter petition. 2. The petitioner claims that he has engaged Advocate for filing the appeal for reduction of fine amount. He wants refund of fee from the learned Advocate. 3. We called for the papers of appeal filed by the petitioner. 4. Criminal appeal is already decided. Advocate who was representing the petitioner was a different person from the advocate from whom the petitioner is claiming refund. 2 5. The petitioner's grievance in the form of writ petition is misplaced. No writ can be issued for the purpose for which the petition is filed. 6. We therefore, dismiss this petition being outside the purview of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 7. Steno copy of this order be supplied to the learned APP for communicating it to the prisoner through the Superintendent, Central Jail, Nagpur. Judge Judge |muley|