^- -4-2 HIGH COIJRT QE CHHATTISGARH AT BII.ASPIIR Vijay Knmar Dewangan, Aged 42 years, S/o. Late Chliote lal Dewangan Working as Peon (Suspendend), At- Jaapad Panchavat, Akaltara, District- Jaiijgir-Cbanipa (CG) R/o. Akaltara, District -Janigir-Cbampa (CG1 Vs. RESPONDESNTS 1. State of Ctaliattisgarh, Throngh-The Secretaiy, Departaient of Pancbayat and Rural Developm.eut, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Co11ector, Distt. .lanjgir-Cbaatpa (CG) 3. The Chief Rxeciitive Officer, .lanpad Paacbayat, Akaltara, Distt. Jaiygir- Champa (CG) 4. Rajeshwsar Patle, President, Janpad Pauchayat, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (CG) WRIT PETITIOS USDESR ARTICLE 836 OF THE; COSSTITUTIGN OF IFiDIA Presence : Shri R.K.Kesarwani, coiinsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S.KachIiawaha, GoverEunent Advocate for the State on advance copy. OR&L GRDBR (06.11.2007) SUNBL KUMAR. SINHA^ J, Heard on adinission. » Thc petitioner has cHallenged the. validity, legality and propriety of the order dated 11.09.2007 passed by t.hc Chief Rxecutiye Officer, iJanpaf) Panchayat, Akaltan-i; by wbicll flie said anthority 1iaa snspended ttie petitioTier on certain grounds. / A penisal oftbe oiderwonld show that the aHegations are that the pefitioner used to abuse the President afte.r consuuiing W.P.(S)NO. 6412 OF 2007 tJ'uguna liquor and therKhy he committed misRonriDct which is against the provisions ofC.G. Civil Services (Conrliict Riiles), 1Q65. I^'amed counsel for the petitioner argiicr! fliat tl-iere is some dispute between flie. respondent No.4 and tTie petitioner, therefbre, on false ground s, the petitioner has been suspended. Admittedly, a factlial aspect 1iias been 1'aised by the petjtioner. It wonld not be possible for thfi writ Cozirt to ejtamine sucb factlial aspect raiscd hy the petitioner in wi-it jurisdiction under Article 326 of the Constitiition of India becaiise this Court cannot indulge into enquiry ahout sny disputed fact raised by a party. In view of tiie above, 1 am not inclined to adniit this petition for hearing. For the foregoing reason, the pRtition stands dismissed at uiotion stage ftself. However, the petitioner s1ia11 hp. at lilierty to avail appropriate stetutory reiaedy availaWe to liiin under flie law. No cost. -———-— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge