9c. appa 1163-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1163 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 697 OF 2010 Sandip @ Babu Suresh Ghag & Ors .. Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam a/w Mr. Jagdish Chaudhary for the Applicants Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants-original accused no. 1 to 3 have been convicted under Sections 323 and 341 read with Section 34 of IPC. The appeal preferred by them against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicants are seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicants stated that besides this case, the applicants have a clean record. He further stated that the applicants were on bail during the trial and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. 1 9c. appa 1163-10.doc Both these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. Further, learned advocate for the applicants submitted that the maximum sentence imposed on the applicants is one year and the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said period, hence, the applicants be granted bail. 4. Thus, looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant nos. 1 to 3 i.e Sandip @ Babu Suresh Ghag, Kailash Ashok Panchal and Sachin Rajaram Chatwal be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- [Rs. Twenty Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicants shall report to the Borivali Police Station once in three months till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 9c. appa 1163-10.doc 3