HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPVR W.P. (S) No. 7569 of 2007 PETITIONER Uderam, s/o Shri Ghagaru Rawat, ag€d about 61 years, Working as Gangman, Departmsnt of P.W.D., Resident of village Barpapli, Tahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Sccretary, Public Works Depal‘tmentk Mantralaya, D.K.b Bhavan, Raipur (C..G.) 2. The Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sarangarh Tahsii, Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh WRIT PETITIGN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri R5 Patcl, Counsel for tho potitionor. Shli Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State] respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20.12.2(307) SIENIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a permanent Gang—man is to be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with ‘ the Chhattisgarh Shaskt‘ya Sevak mdhivarshiki-Aw) Adhiniyam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch ofmatters i.e. WP. No. 108/2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 (Govind & Others vs. State of C.G. and others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. Learned counsel for the State fairly agrees that this \Jnatter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits“ .\y \t that in some matters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some interim order is passed, merely on account tition cannot of tiling of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ pe when the matter is squarely covered by the be kept in abeyance, said judgment. In the result, this petition is allowed. sed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No.108/ 2005 and other connected matters. No It is dispo order as to cost. l ‘ .1‘ Sd/- . Sunil Kumar Sinha i Judge (a