IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3549 of 2007 Between: J. Mysaiah S/o Balaiah r/o 4-4-1/A, Nacharam Village, Kapra municipality, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Kapra Municipality repbyits Commissioner, ECIL X Roads, R.R. District. 2 J. Laxman S/o J. Yadaiah r/o 4-4-6, Nacharam Village, Kapra Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 1 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dt 11-09-2006 for taking appropriate action against the 2nd respondent who is making illegal construction by occupying he 3feet open path way as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 1 by considering the representation of the petitioner dt 11-09-2006 take appropriate action to prevent illegal construction and blockade of pathway for egress and ingress forthwith and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA(SC FOR MPL(TA)) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3549 of 2007 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 23.04.2009, the matter was directed to be posted for dismissal. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present, nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J 24.04.2009 v v