PETxTmN UNDER ARTECLw 226 OF TH}: cemW ’ Mug ‘é itxvsukh Sagdr, ‘ ‘ ’ r > A S/o Vathan satnaml, H aged about 4? year$ ‘ Non; Bal. " 7 W/o $ukh Sagar, ‘ ,~ m I age ‘xabout 35 years. _ k 1 Both R/o Villagau “yolice station :> Akaltara, .Tahsl Janjglr, _: » > Distt. -. Janjgirwchamp ‘ (Chhattisgarh) > Veréus‘ The Inspector Genaral -BlWaspur (Chhatblsgarh). r bllce Station‘ Akaltara, - . JanJgir, V [xvavlwvx ' l P/FS/2005 - 20,000 Shri Vashwan'r singh T akur, Govt. Adv. for the sTme. Heard. 9E“ a The peti'fioner has pr erred ‘rhis writ pe‘ri‘rion under Article 226 of fhe Cons‘rifu'rion of India for direc‘ring The respondénfs 1'0 regisrer the offence under Section 06 of 1'he Indian Penal Code agains'r fhe per-sonwho ober'red 1‘he dec m commit suicide. filing of fhis pe‘ri'rion are fhm- The pefifioner's dough'i'er namely Kumari Sani @ Shashi Bai, aged about 16 years commi'r‘ied suicide 9.1.2002 by consuming poison o1 her residence. The case of The e Brief foc‘rs leading 1'ioner is fhaf his'doughfer Sani @ Shoshl Bai was in love with one Brije hwar, son of Mahani' Ram, she Was sexually e exploited by him and when h refused to marry with Sani @ Shashi Bai, she commi’h'ed suicide. F er case of The pe‘l'i‘rioner is 1'ha'r police authorities are not registeri g the case inspite of report to the police aufhorifies and also To 'rhe In pedor General of Police, Biiaspur. Refurn hos been filed n behalf of fhe respondents in which if has been menfioned that it is inc rrect to say that the report was not token on record rather enquiry conducted into the circumstances under which Sani @ Shashi Bai itted the suicide. Inquest report was prepared. postmortem was conducted and on the date when the postmortem was conducted i on 10.01.2002 no complaint was lodged by SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 o i p u h w c m . . aanmwm $Wm€u 19.9.2005 Shri M.K. Sinha, couh ‘l for fhe pefi‘rioner. 074 mmni$ ..... -_-,.‘i.. “200 U$ LDw {SP/FS/ZOOS 20 000 anéer qa'cb‘(W) ‘ -' mm#%m .‘wmmma \ , $f ma ,,V mawmi’ai ammam - » .4. ‘Ew The pefi‘rioner againsf ‘rhe s d Brijeshwqr. Even on fhat da‘re sfnTemen+s of Dhanimm, Korbehm &:G ashram were recorded. One suicidnl note Annexure R—Z was also 111 info possession and in'1'hn1' suicidal no‘re 'i'here was no mermon abouf he harassmem or explorro‘hon or any ac? of abe‘i’men‘r made by sand B iJeshwar fherefore Sam @ shashl Bai commii'Ted suicide. The su with said Brijeshwar. I have heard learne counsel for The parfies and perused 1'he sfdemen‘l's recorded by Th police during inves'iiga‘iion, inquesf report suicidal no‘I'e and lef‘rers wr‘ en by said 5ani @ Shashi Boi. The report was submi ed before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Janjgir, which was accepted ‘de order dated 4.2.2003: In view of the above cts, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has not been able to make out a case for exercising extra-ordinary ’ jurisdiction by this Court. A such, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismiss However, the petition r, if so advised, is at liberty to take such action as Is available to him nder the Code of Criminal Procedure and if any complaint Is filed In that ase any observation made hereinabove shall not be construed 6i binding and concerned Court will be at liberty to4 was on accoun‘l' of folk-Ire of love affair “fa 5/ k m e .