IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2011 / 25TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22167 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED.C.K., CHAKKITTAKANDATHIL HOUSE, PULIYAKKODE MELMURI, KUZHIMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 505. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MALAPPURAM-676 505. GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 22167 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF VEHICLE NO.KL 11/J 3006 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT OF THE VEHICLE NO.KL 11/J 3006 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.9.2010 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).28073 OF 2010 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.3.11 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).22167/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 16th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Ext.P5 order dated 15.3.2011 is under challenge in this writ petition. This is an order passed by the first respondent giving interim custody of the vehicle. 2.In view of the delay on the part of the petitioner in challenging Ext.P5, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs