IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 6429 of 2001 Between: K.R. Kesari Singh S/o Late K. Ramchander Singh R/o 1-30, Main Bazar, Kurnool. ..... PETITIONER AND 1The District Superintendent of Police S.P. Bangalow, State Guest House Road, Kurnool. 2The Sub-Inspector of Police Special Branch SP Camp Office, S.P. Bangalow, State Guest House Road, Kurnool. 3P.Nadipi Shaik Saheb Alias PN Shaik Saheb, Alias Shegu S/o Pedda Goodu Saheb R/o Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Yemmiganur Taluk, Kurnool Dist. R/o Khander Area, Fort, Kurnool. 4P.Sashavali S/o Pedda Goodu Saheb R/o Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Yemmiganur Taluk, Kurnool Dist. R/o Khander Area, Fort, Kurnool Dist. 5P.Mohammed Saheb S/o Pedda Goodu Saheb R/o Kanakaveedu Village, Nandavaram Mandal, Yemmiganur Taluk, Kurnool Dist. But R/o Khander Area, Fort, Kurnool. 6M.Damodaram Reddy S/o Maadireddigari Chinna Nagi Reddy Diguvapadu Village, Kurnool District. 7K. Giddaiah S/o K.Maarappa H.No.26-425/, Chinna Market Peta, Kurnool. 8K.Chandraiah Setty R/o Kavadigeri, Kurnool. 9Lalam Venkata Ramaiah R/o Near King Mnarket, Fort, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction,more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 and 2 in directing the petitioners to pay the amounts to pay the amounts to respondents 3 to 9 under threat as arbitrary, illegal, capricious, violative of allcannons of law and justice and consquently direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to harrass the petitioner and his family in any manner what so ever including calling the petitioner to the police station and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.S.ANAND Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 9: Mr.T.P. Sharma The Court made the following : ORDER: The case of the petitioner is that the respondents 1 and 2 are insisting upon payment of money said to have been due and payable to the unofficial respondents 3 to 9 under the threat and therefore, seeks to issue a direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 not to harass him and his family members including calling him to the police station. The respondents 1 and 2 filed counter stating that they never interfered with the civil transactions and they never insisted for payment of money and all the averments made in the writ petition have been denied. In view of the aforesaid categorical denial in the counter by the official respondents that they never attempted for settlement of civil disputes or interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition and hence the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:09.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}