-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 33 OF 2006 Ravi Sachdev ... Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and another ..Respondents Mr. H.R. Hukmani for the petitioner. Mr. V.D. Patil for respondents. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. DATE: APRIL 13, 2007. P.C. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that there was a mistake on the part of the first respondent as, despite the order of the court dated 24th February, 2006, he did not enter upon the reference and adjudicate upon the dispute between the parties, while tendering unconditional apology. He further states that the Commissioner will enter upon the reference, act as an Arbitrator and conclude the proceedings most expeditiously. 2. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondents, -2- the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no objection, if the Commissioner enters upon the reference and adjudicates upon the disputes expeditiously and he is agreeable for this order. Consequently, this petition is disposed of in the above agreed terms and the Commissioner of the Corporation shall now enter upon the Reference forthwith, issue notice to the parties for appearance before him and complete the arbitration proceedings with utmost expedition. Petition is disposed of accordingly, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. CHIEF JUSTICE