^o^ / •ESS HISH <SWS^ Q^ 3VBIW73ES AT BSXftSWE (S.G.) WRIT PETITKM N8. 365 7 ©» 2003 aashll stogh ^e feri Saghuraj Singli aatcur. ageiS dscwb 3®years» %Bchaya'fe i»®retary»Qran Itoehayat Kinftiali, Bleek jagdMpyr Slstrict Bastar- (®G). :BE'rIfIGNBa 1. A S D lihe State of QihattlsgaEh, Sirough •ttoe Secretars' BepaFtnieat of BaPttoayat, ana Sosial selfare, Mantralay. S.K.s. Building. Raipur (os). 2. 3. s. 3be Additional @&llector» Bastar at 3agdalpur {eg}. •B»e Sub Bivislonal SfftiGer' (BBveciue) •Tagdalpur Bfestriet Bastar (©3). Itae Beputy Elireetor, JE'aRehayat ap<3 Soeial Ctelfare. Jagdalpur Blstriet Bastar (C3@)« Ihe ©»lefBxecutlve ©ffficer, J»ii>a3 ?anetoayat 3'agdalpur Bistriet Bastar (S©). 3nt. Sunamani W'o Budhu, Besidenfe of Village nihall, BloGk Jagdalpur. Dlstricfe Bastar (®s). KESP@B6WTS WB'XT ISTI"l'l9Kf'tmBBfiART»a<BS 226/227 W TOE ems'£i 'SiBa ©?3NB% Partlculars of - ie Itefel.tloBST » | As stat®3in -fche eausa title above. XI-HC-22 3lA?TW Wi* sf^y ^^ ^l^c) <<• '3^ -i11<11d<<, aflT^f'is, ['iini'My ^ an^r xra^ ^_.fc?..;.i'....ff.°.:. *ii*«iiaiiich 'WI, 2003 isre^ar' sii^i ^giw ^ift^ 15.03.2004 SmtReau Kochar, Counsel Slul Yasliwant Smgti, G< advaace copy. I.A.NO. 10484/ 2003 for CX| copy is not pressed. As such it i^ I.A.No. 10485/3.003 for ui-g^ By fhis pctition fifed Cdiistitution of India., pGtitioncr dated 16,10,2003 (Annexiire P-1] stayed the operation of the ordej Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Leamed counsel fbr tbe order has been pbtained by Tnen.ti|3 T^eamed Oovt. Advocate sil aad material on record, in fhe CM<i[<n<tl'i.<-l!*tgr'^ t^st' <^i^i< ^ 31^1 311^1 itbr the Petitioner?' -yy' G4)vt. Advocate for the State on smption fl-oia flting the certifled disposed of. ;ut heaitug is allowcd. itndcr Arti.clc 236/227 of fhc prays for actting asidc tlic ordcr wlljpreby €heAdditional CoUector dated 25.9.3003;passed by the p^titio stttioner subinitted fhiat this stay .• . . • . amng vcrong facts. hmits that if an oricr has hRcn obtained by wrong mention or si.(ppressioii of facts then it is open to fhe parties to appty for vacatio] 1-laving considered the fael aud circumstances of the case }piuion of fhis Court no case is [1q»^I^ •t @ynimHi»"n'.»«(»—-*<i*»- XI-HC-22 sn^r'w Wl'h St^S aiwti tfFsa "~$7 ~s^~;w^y, ofll'M'is, f<«<ii+iy WHVII a>ww SW^ IR^? ..^.:.£.^.J&0:..1^11_ "^. 200^ tc|<)<{S(" W^\ j'WIWdfTO i£ made out warrantmg iaterference] jurisdiction under Artictes 226/2: However, since the matter is open to the petitioner to apply Jf sucli an appMcation 1s made it| toy ttic auttiorlty as expedltlously ^ Willi Uic disposcd of(A<%Wi otiseiyaliou/dire^'liou 'l'l^trtll'I *<l*<tlT4 fS(Zt tRqtSK ^ .aiPgiT 3ii^i by tfais Court in exercise of its 7 ofthe Constitution oflndia. pending beforc tfae authority, it For vacation of stay or otherwise; shall t»econsldered and declded s posslble. aToicsaul tlus pcUtiyu is A