: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2273 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.2273 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.2273 OF 2000 Dr.Suhas S.Sahasrabudhe ..Petitioner Versus 1. Shivaji University Kolhapur-416 004 & Ors. ..Respondents ---- Mr.G.S.Godbole for the petitioner. Mr.R.G.Ketkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar AGP for Respondent No.5. ---- Coram : R.M.LODHA & Coram : R.M.LODHA & Coram : R.M.LODHA & R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 7.4.2005. PC . Heard. 2. During the course of hearing the learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4 handed in the recommendation of the Examination Lapses Enquiry Committee taken on 6.4.2005 marked as "Exhibit-A" for identification purposes. 3. A perusal of the recommendation of the Examination Lapses Enquiry Committee shows that the committee has now recommended that the punishment already under-gone by the petitioner is sufficient and he may be given examination work from March-April-2006. : 2 : 4. We are informed by the learned Counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 4 that the recommendation of the Examination Lapses Enquiry Committee dated 6.4.2005 has been accepted by the Vice Chancellor under Section 32(4) of Maharashtra Universities Act 1994. 5. In view of acceptance of the recommendation of Examination Lapses Enquiry Committee dated 6.4.2005 by the Vice Chancellor, the impugned communications dated 22.5.1999 (Exh.28) and 20.9.1999 (Exh.I), obviously, stand substituted. 6. At this stage, in view of what we observed above the learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of Writ petition. 7. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. 8. No costs. (R.M.LODHA,J) (R.M.LODHA,J) (R.M.LODHA,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J)