IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21590 of 2009 HARI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08.07.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that the daughter of the informant, who is married to the son of the petitioner, was residing in the matrimonial home since 8-9 years. It is alleged that the dead body of the daughter of the informant was found in a deserted condition on the railway track. In course of investigation, it appears that witnesses have supported the prosecution case indicating implication of the petitioners. Such incident was preceded by demand of Hero Honda motorcycle and one bhar gold from the informant as dowry which was not fulfilled. It is submitted that the petitioner is the father- in-law. He may not have the role in killing the deceased. It is further contended that he resides separately. The petitioner is in custody since 24.1.2009. Having regard to the allegations and the materials collected in support thereof the prayer for bail made on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. This Court, however, grants liberty to the 2 petitioner to renew the prayer for bail after nine months if the trial in the meanwhile does not commence. Bibhash (Kishore K. Mandal, J. )