w(mz_\ $m§€§ Eamh WI. F GR m: M m1? \S” 99$ gETITIQgEg Dhannu Lal Sonkar, S/O Shri Jawahar La! Sonkar, aged about 27 years, Occupation- Shikshakarmi Class— III, at Primary School Kerapara, Block Division Mainpur, District Raipur (C.G.) g VERSUS v1. VState of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, District- Raiput,(c.G.) ff 2. Director Panchayat, District Raipur, (C.G.) 3/ Collector, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 4. f Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, District— { Raipur, (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Mairipur, District~ Raipur, (C.G.) /. € District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) Raipur, %§§$%§ CGGQ? E: vHhr’K?T§Séi-‘R%§ EiLf-xéEPLR WRIT PETIT (3} NO “’5? {BF “’{m§ Shannu L a $Omkar EWWGNER gasus 'tate a? Cahai€isgarh & Omeis {Writ Pei§$ion under Afticie 225 0f i¥xe Canstiwtian 6f 3ndia) £ingie Sench : Hmi‘bia $h:i §atish K. ;§gnéhair§, J‘ Pmsené :- m. Awqia‘n mpath cmmse for %%e aemaener $nn P K Ehquun Pane} Luwva-y fm" the S aie. r1 #si’un $a6, counse; .m‘ me resgmndeni' NaS. §E5PGNDENTS j I A GQDQR {uni-3L“ gP335ed an ims 3 day a? aevemhez 2QQ3} y:” Iémm H.‘ the consent 6f ieamed ccunsei agpearmg fer iim pai1iefs, the petitisn is heam‘ ‘s‘énaiiy. The pe§i€§anen m Ema pa‘immi, is aggfTiaved by ma cas1cei§a§icn cf his appoimmeni {arder (m {he gmst a? Shiksha: Kafmi. *3raée i3: under Janpad Panahaya‘t Mainpuf, wémaui a'g’fmdimg ar! cpporéani‘ty ef hearing. ‘2”he questkm sf gaw invo’iveé m th§3 wr§i namkm i$ wheiiher ihe appaimment of the pe‘mianer, whu has iaeen appaimed after'due seiection on the gost 0f Shiksha Karmi grade E; ca“: De canceiied on the ground cf sabmzsami’: 6f aieged. faige and fcrged u‘ocumems by 3Gme 6f me cancikiateS, withcut affording an cpp'crtumw of hearing. The ind'isputabie facts, in nutsheii, are ihai the peEiiiorier wee seiected for appomtmen‘i on the $03$ of $h§ksh3 Karmi Grade ‘ii m auah pacpe. eeieiféon process afad‘ he was, accoméngiy qpgsomtea’. af€er game’sime, the {imef Execmive I}n a( ! ‘$ff§cef, Jan§3ad Parachayai, Mainpur canceiieci the appeintmen"; of ihe petwicner an ih 'gmuné 6f suiami$s§0n sf false and fargea‘ dacumerits, by awai’ {imnexure - Pl’i 1 Eeing aggrievedgihe pétféiuner hfs fiiac£ {his Wm pemien seeking a direction ia quash ‘the :mpugned order. by which ihe gervices of *{he petiéicner ha$i been iefminmed: and ta gram reiie'f a? can‘tinua‘tion of service an the pwgi 6f $hiksha Karmi $i’ade-3H. s. Learned counse? appearing for ‘ihe pe‘mioner womd subm¥i iha€ once ihe §3emioner has baen appoiiwied after fsimwmg praper seiection process zmd after vea‘ifica%iQn af ihe’ documents! his appointmeni cannm be canceiied wi‘thau‘é affordiiig are opportunity of hiaariiig. Leamed camisai wauid furiher submit ihat f‘he pefiiioner eughi ta have beean giver: ai , ieasi an opporiuriiiy of heaiéhg its atabiish the geauinaazess 0r bana iiaie cf ihe éccumen‘ia whiah weréi aiiegeoiiy , ci‘iscmiered, iaier on, ay the auth0€iiie$, as faise and forgeci documenits, after appom‘tmem 6f the §3eiiii0nean Learned éoun3ei appearing far ‘ihe petiiiarief wauid fufther submit thai or; the gimiiar iasis and si‘tuaiiamihe idenficai issue ”ms beer. aecidaci hy this Cami by guzigmem daied ?-8-2$G§ in WP. {5) N0. 3&i2 of 2§m§ {Safgésh Prasad $inha Vs‘ Staie e’f Chhaiéisgarh & others} and oiher comiecied matters, as weii as by order dateci 2?-*'i)-2%§ in WF. (S) No. i 13 of 29% {Shiv Kumar Vefma & anothef ‘is. State of ‘ Chhattisgar’n & others), which were ailowéd. Thus, ihe v l ¢ 1 ‘ OI .3 .Aiwamo‘if‘” /7 (JA. present wa’§€ petifion $eserves to bi- aéiaweai (m ‘me gmarad c1? pariiy. Leamed courase§ appearing far ihe respona‘ems do nat controvert the above Eubmissiens made by ieamed cauriseg ; appearing far ‘ihe pe‘%iiionef. I have heard :eamed caunsel a1§3peaf§ng fa? me pa:€ies, paused the p!eac%§ngs anti €he dc ?umems agapaaded there€a §t i3 evia‘em ihaf ihe appeinfmerg Gmes' dated 18-§-2397’ wa$ saHmeHed af%e:' abcut ‘Ewe years, wi‘éhau‘é affmémg an oppca’iumiy cé hearmg ‘kc me §eta%iami The minciwa sf iaw ‘ §n passmg such cra’ef, which visifs wEth civii sansequemea % %5 weii sewed. No punitiwe mder cari be wassad wi'khout agipiying the basic pr§nc%pie o? natmai jusikzé and fair way m ac%ion. ‘%‘§1e ccrii’mvea'sy inva§ve§ m ihis case wa3 ccrwieiered by this Gour& in Burgesh Prasad Sinha {supra} anai Shiv Kumar Verma Supra). Accordingiy, the impug§$ed arder daied 34-7-2G69 (Annexure - Pf?) if: resgect Gé‘ we peti‘éioner §3 quashed“ The peti‘tiaa“. is aiiswed. No omer aste costs. Since the pe€iti6ne§' is c‘cntmuing an €he basés a"? §nEe¥im ower granted by this Caurt, §ha pa€§tiane§’ §3 nateaé§i£ied k3 q CD any aiher re§ief. However, havmg {egaw ta ihe a‘acES s%€a&x§o:’i of the caSe, §ibe¥ty $5 Ve3ewed ‘éa the respwm“ef!&s 1"- é’zak(D agpmwiaw act§an£ste§s if? aCBardafwe w§éh kw, i3” ga‘z advised, afiei’ commymg WM} the basic pimciwes m‘ maiurai jusiice and fair may an acticn -§rr A .