IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-21717 of 2010 Date of decision: 15.09.2010 Ramesh .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. .. Respondent Present:- Mr.R.A.Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Preeti Choudhari, AA.G., Haryana, for the respondent-State. * * * * 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) It is stated by learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Attar Singh, that before the trial Court the entire prosecution evidence has been led and the case is now fixed for 16.09.2010 for defence evidence. No ground for bail is made out. Accordingly, the present petition for regular bail is dismissed. However, taking into account the fact that the petitioner is in custody since the year, 2007, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and the case be finally decided within 4 months. September 15, 2010 (NIRMALJIT KAUR) sukhpreet JUDGE