IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8828 of 2009 M/S RAMBRIKSHA SINGH, a partnership firm through its partner Sri Sheo Shankar Prasad Singh, Son of Late Rambriksh Singh, resident of Jaiprakash Nagar, Karma Road, Aurangabad, P.S. & Distt- Aurangabad :---- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer (Traffic), South Bihar Wing, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Magadh Road Circle, Road Construction Department, Gaya. 5. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division-1, Aurangabad. 6. The Assistant Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Sub-Division-1, Aurangabad :--- Respondents. ----------- 7. 16.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order bearing Letter No. 332 dated 24.4.2009, Annexure-22, whereunder the Executive Engineer, Road Division No.-1, Aurangabad has held him non-responsive for his failure to execute the work within the time granted under the agreement executed by and between the petitioner and the Executive Engineer. He is further aggrieved by the order bearing Memo No. 502 dated 30.05.2009, Annexure-23, whereunder the Executive Engineer has rescinded his agreement in the light of the provisions contained in the Standard Bidding document forfeiting his security money and earnest deposit. Having heard the counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to proceed with the hearing of the writ petition and I deem it appropriate that the petition should be dismissed as the orders impugned have been passed in terms of the agreement and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the two orders, he should approach either the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction or the departmental authorities. 3. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)