IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6627 of 2007 Shabnam Kausar, D/O Md.Shabbir Akhtar, W/O Mohammad Kajim, resident of village Ezorbara, Panchayat BARA Paursauni, via, Block & P.S. Phenara, District- East Champaran, Bihar ……….. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, District- Motihari, East Champaran 2.The District Education Officer, District- Motihari, East Champaran 3.The District Superintendent of Educaqtion, District- Motihari, East Champaran 4.The Block Development Officer (BDO) Block Phenara, Anchal- Phenara, District- Motihari, East Champaran 5.The Head Master, Rashtriya Prathmik Urdu Vidyalaya Ezor Bara, South Prakhand Phenara, P.S. Phenara, District- Motihari, East Champaran 6.The Present Mukhia Smt.Mahadevi, W/O Sri Sheo Kumar Singh, Grampanchayat Bara Parsauni Ezore Bara South, P.S. Phenara, Block Phenara, District- East Champaran 7.The Ex-Mukhia, Sri Sheo Kumar Singh, S/O LOate Sri Ramadhar Singh, Grampanchayat Bara Parsauni Ezore Bara South, P.S. Phenara, Block Phenara, District- East Champaran 8.The President Vidyalaya Siksha Samitee, Rashtriya Prarambhik Vidyalaya, Ezore Bara South, Block Phenara, P.O. & P.S. Phenara, District- Motihari, East Champaran …………. Respondents ----------- 2. 25/03/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their - 2 - employment. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of her grievances. In case such an application is filed by the petitioner within one month, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed therewith, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced, and other relevant records and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)