HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPVR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION fS) No. 3677 of2007 Smt. Nalmi Sharma (Before Marriage Ku. B. NalmiRao)W/oRajKumarSharmaAgeabout48 years, Lecturer Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Risali, Dm-g,R/o : St. No. 5, Ashish Nagar (W), Risali, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgrh Through: Secretary, School Education Departinent Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director ofpublic Instruction Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education OfBcer Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 4. Joint Director Treasuiy & Accounts, Durg (C.G.) WRITPETmON LWDER,ARTICLE_2260FTHE_CONSTmiTION OF INDIA SinaleBench: Hon'bIeJusticeShriSatlshK.Agiuhotn, Present; ShriS.K.Thomas, Advocate forthe petitioner. Smt. Anju Aliuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. (Passed on 29th day of June, 2007) Leamed counsel appeariag for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question oflaw invplved m the present writ petitiori are the same to fhat ofin Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and anotfaer {2006 (II) MPJR-CG %}, whichhas been disposed ofvide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert tfae said submissioa. Accordingly, the writ petition is ailowed in terms ofthe order passed ia the case ofYashwant Knmar Bharadwaj Vs. Munlcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of'the fact' asto whether fhe petitioner has. acquired B.Ed Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aad further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt Bi.,r3»Aa'-~-;Q'f«:a.Su&3aa5-.~^iAa.i».^„/-&