IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 30298 of 2007(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SAJEEVI, S/O.DAMODARAN, NIKHARTHIL HOUSE KOLANGHAT, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, UDAYAMPEROOR P.O., SOUTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE. PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDLINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 30298 OF 2007 F ===================== Dated this the 6th day of November, 2007 J U D G M E N T Exts. P1 and P2 are under challenge. By these orders, the application for assignment of the land has been rejected by the Revenue Divisional Officer and the said order has been confirmed in revision by Ext.P2 order. A perusal of Exts. P1 and P2 shows that the applications have been turned down acting upon the directions issued by this court in the judgment in OP 17233/96 and OP 16077/96. These judgments have been produced by the petitioner as Exts. P4 and P5 and I have gone through these judgments as well. 2. In the light of the directions as contained in the aforesaid judgments, authorities cannot be faulted for the view they have taken in Exts.P1 and P2. Writ petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp