1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1921 OF 2008 Yashwant @ Chandrakant Ramchandra Mendki .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents Shri G. V. Wani, Advocate for the Petitioner. Smt. V. A. Shinde, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 1. Shri Bhushan Kulkarni, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 02ND FEBRUARY, 2010. ORAL ORDER [ PER A. P. DESHPANDE, J. ] : 1. Rejection of the petitioners application for freedom fighters pension has given rise to filing of this petition. According to the petitioner he had participated in the Liberation Movement & Hyderabad Mukti Sangram and hence is eligible to claim the 2 pension. 2. By a speaking and reasoned order dated 22nd May, 2007, the Central Government has rejected the application of the petitioner by assigning four reasons which are stated in paragraph No. 4 of the impugned order. We have gone through the order. The order not only reflects proper application of mind but fair consideration of the application moved by the petitioner claiming freedom fighters pension. 3. In our view no interference with the impugned order is called for. Petition is thus dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the concerned authority afresh in the event if the petitioner comes in possession all the relevant documents. Liberty as prayed for is granted. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ A. P. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Feb. 2010