IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3777 of 2011() ------------------------------------- CC.NO.681/2010 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, HOSDURG CRIME NO.225/2010 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT .................... PETITIONER(S): IST ACCUSED --------------------------------------------- NOUSHAD, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMEDKUNHI, SANAS MANZIL, PUTHARIYADUKKAM, CHATTANCHAL, THEKKIL GRAMAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN RESPONDENT(S): STATE ------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING HOSDURG POLICE STATION. 2. SAFARBAN.K., AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.SHAMSHUDHEEN, KARUVALAM HOUSE, P.O.PADNEKKAD, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. PIN-671 121. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.NIJOY THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.3777/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.225/2010 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION. ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.225/2010 BEFORE THE JFCM- 1, HOSDURG. ANNEX A3 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT,2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C. 3777 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011 O R D E R The petitioner is the accused in CC.681/2010 on the file of JFCM – I, Hosdurg. The offence alleged against him is under Section 498A IPC. The second respondent is the de facto complainant in this case. She is represented in this court by her counsel. The learned counsel submits that the parties have settled the matter out of court and that the second respondent has no grievance in the matter. Affidavit of the complainant is filed to that effect. Since the dispute is purely personal and as the parties have settled the matter this petition is allowed. Further proceedings in CC. 681/2010 is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE smvd