IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7443 of 2011 Babita Devi & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 5 17.10.2011 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the dispute happens to be amongst Sautan. The informant happens to be elder while petitioner, Babita Devi happens to be younger. It has further been disclose that the informant is now dead. As per fardbeyan itself, Babli Kumari is her daughter who is cared by petitioners themselves. So submitted that Babli Kumari be allowed to substitute the informant, so that the flavor of congenial and harmonious atmosphere should be allowed to prevail. Because of the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioner has himself disclosed restoration of good feeling amongst the parties, also compelled the learned Additional P.P. to suggest that the learned lower court be accordingly directed. Thus, the learned lower court is directed to see whether the informant is dead or not and if so, will also see whether substitution is permissible or not. In the background of aforesaid theme, the learned lower court will disposed of the matter taking into account the conduct of Babli Kumari who may either examine herself on behalf of prosecution or on behalf of defence. With the aforesaid observation instant petition is disposed of. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)