•AESyS^.SSSs^MSiAffi^iaaSS.sas^ „.< IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURELAT^ILASPUR t^> _j.C.G^ W.P.'N'O. -S~6 ^'^ /20Q7 t- PETITIONER Plaintiff RESPONDENTS ..'• J^tp ^?l':'o<^!"".. RalPur (C-G-) .^•••v' ..•-""" fc >--o<?%"-"" w fc§;'?<%r"""' .2 ,..--<^-V.o^^ (^ »\y . O y..v Premlal, S/o Manbodhi Kanwar, aged about 48 years, R/o Village Pond, Tahsil, Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Kiramin Bai, W/o Amrit Lal Kanwar, Aged about 27 years, R/o Village Pond, Tah. Gariyaband, Distt. ^( /<-.-/ .t^ ^^y 2. Ashok Kumar S/o Gend Lal Halwa, Aged baout 30 years, R/o Village Pond, Tah. Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Collector, Raipur (C.G.)l 4. Premin Bai W/o Shankar Nai, R/o Village- Charouda, Tah. Rajim Distt. Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGrARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P. (C) No. 5688/2007 Premlal Versus RESPONDENTS Iflram.in Bai and others SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AOARWAL, J PRESENT:- Shri B.P. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate, for the respondent No. 2. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State. OJLAL_0_R_DJLR (11-4-2011) 1. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that while passing the order impugned, petitioner's arguments have not been considered. He seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file review petition before the trial Court. 2. Liberty as prayed for is granted. 3. The petition is disposed ofwith the liberty aforesaid. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge