1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4447 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2006 Mohammad Ramzan Abdul Gani vs. Bharat Kumar Ramniklal Parekh & Ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR AND B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. JULY 05, 2007. Shri Pathan, learned counsel appearing for the review applicant contends that there was some confusion on previous date of hearing and therefore he was misled. The perusal of paras 2 & 3 of Civil Application clearly shows that this is not the reason put forth for seeking review. During hearing of this application, Shri Parchure, learned counsel states that if possession is handed over to the respondents today, the respondents shall hand over it back to the appellant or the review applicant, if ultimately appeal is allowed, immediately 2 on next date after the appeal is allowed. The review applicant is not ready to accept this proposal. We find no substance in the civil application. The same is accordingly dismissed with cost of Rs. 5,000/-. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.