HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETmON CS) No. 1159 of2009 PETmONER : Sudamalal Agrawal.s/b Late Nanuk Sao,Aged about 55 years, Asstt. Teacher, P.S. - Bhimbhouri, R/o Shanti Nagar, Sahaspur Lohara, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS RESPO^TDENTS : 1.8tateofChhattisgarh,Through-TheSecretary, Education Departmeiit, D.K.S. Bhawawii, Raipur, Distt: Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Disti-ict Education Officer, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) WMT PETITION LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjnON OF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Deepak Jain, Advoeate for the petifioper. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate fbrtlie State/respondents. (Passed on 27th day of February, 2009) 1. Withtheconsentoftheparties,thematterisheardfinaUy. 2. Leamed counsel aDDearing for the petitioaer submits that fhis matter is .squai-ely eovered by the order dated 27.6.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 3566QOO'; (Loknath Patel v. State QfChhattisgaA & Others). 3. Leamed counsel appearmg &r tfae State/Fespondents submits that in the everrt, the case of the petitioner is ebvered by the decision in the matter of Lokaafh Patel (sMpra), the petitionermay beentitled tothe same relief. 4. In view ofthe foregoing, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation pointing out'fhe dates of appomtment and how the same is cova-ed by|fhe decision ofthis Court mtihe matter ofLoknath Patel (supra) 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotrii Judge j Ajmt -T-»y