IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35526 of 2009 1. RAM LAGAN PASWAN S/O CHHOTE LAL PASWAN 2. UMESH PASWAN S/O PHULESHWAR PASWAN, BOTH R/O VILLAGE- BARAI, P.S. ASARGANJ, DISTRICT-MUNGER--PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR-------- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 3 17.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Asarganj P.S. Case No. 20 of 2009 was instituted under several sections including 323, 341, 324, 326, 302, 201 of the Indian penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Submission of learned counsel is that though the petitioners are named in the FIR to be part of the crowd and are alleged to be armed with weapons, nothing more is alleged beyond the said allegation. It is the case of the petitioners that there was dispute with regard to property in question going on between the parties. The reason for they have been named in the FIR is that they had taken orchard on settlement and that became the cause for driving the petitioners in the present cases. It is also submitted that nothing substantive has come during investigation as what has been stated above. That being the position, let both the petitioners, namely, (1) Ram Lagan Paswan and (2) Umesh Paswan be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No. 20 of 2009. One of the - 2 - sureties to be executed by the respective father of the petitioners and other by close blood relations on due identification of the court below. Petitioners will cooperate in the trial of the case by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by themselves or through their counsel. They shall not abscond. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)