IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27674 of 2009 PREM SHANKAR SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. No. 30864 of 2009 KUMAR MAYANK @ MAYANK KUMAR @ MURARI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------- 5 18.12.2009 These cases have been listed under the heading ‘To be mentioned’ at the instance of the informant. Order dated 11.12.2009 is recalled as it has been wrongly incorporated in these cases and in Cr. Misc. No. 30753/2009 along with Cr. Misc. No. 34983/2009 vice versa. Now order dated 11.12.2009 be read as follows: “As both these cases arise out of the same police station case number, they are heard together. It could have been a simple case of 498A of the Penal Code imposing much liability upon the husband but the victim girl is traceless, rather it has come that she was informing to her brother about torture caused upon her. Investigation is pending since long. So, in my view, these cases are not of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, both these petitions for anticipatory bail are rejected. “ A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)