05 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) No. 2403 of2008 PETITIONER APPLICANT RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANT Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Matyadit Throii^i: The Ciiief Execirtive OfBcer, Ja^ialpur, Dist. Bastar(C.G-) VERSUS : 1) The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societi^s, Jagdalpm', Distt. Bastar Director, 4) Jeevan Lal Verma, S/o H.R.Verma, Ex-Lamps ManagCT, Sanibalpyr at Present Old Teachers Colony, Tilda, Post Nevra, Tahsil Tilda, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON U/A227 OF TPIE CONSTrTLTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnihoM, J. Present: Shri Praftill Bharat, Advocate fbrthe pctitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakiir, Deputy Advocate General forthe StaW respondent No. 1 to 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 28th day of April, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner-Bank submits that the respondent No. 4 was terminated froni service after proper enquisy on 19.04,2005. The respondent No. 3, thereafter quashed the termmation order in an appeal filed by the respondent No. 4 on 09.01.2007 (Amiexure P/l). Bemg aggrieved, the petitioner-Bank preferred an appeal befbre the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, alongwith aii application for stay ofthe order dated 09.01.2007 passed by the Deputy Registrar. The Joint Registrar dismissed tiie application fbr staying the order dated 09.01.2007, on 16.05.2007 (Annexure P/2). The petitioner, thereafter preferred a revision which was also dismissed om 25.02.2008 (Aimexure P/3) on the ground of non-maintamability. Thus, this petition. 2. Shri Bharat^leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after dismissal ofthe application for stay, the Joint Registrar, resposident No. 2 is not deciding the appeal which was filed m the month of Februaiy 2007. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respoiident No, 2 to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 3. Iii normal course, fhis Court should not entertam such petition seeking a directioH to the quasi-judicial authority for disposal ofappeal. However, in the facts situatioii ofthe case., the petitiosier is at liberty to make asi application before the Joint Registrar, Cooperativs Societies, to coiisider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 4. In view ofthe foregoing observatiom, this petition stands disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge A?mt