CWP(T) No. 7482 of 2008 23.02.2011 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma and Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondent/State. It cannot be disputed that petitioner has worked with respondent No. 2 for more than 20 years as cutting and tailoring teacher. 2. In this petition she has prayed for regularisation of her services and payment of minimum wages fixed by the Government. Her salary has been fixed in the pay scale of Rs. 200-10-250 per month w.e.f. 19.6.1975. 3. It is not in dispute that she has been continuously rendering her service, to the satisfaction of her employer, for over a period of two decades. Yet the respondents have not framed any scheme or taken any policy decision of either regularising their services or according higher monetary benefits. No doubt petitioner is an employee of respondent No. 2/Board, but however, State also has certain obligations. It has control over respondent No. 2/Board. Being a welfare state, certain measures ought to have been taken for welfare of the employees of respondent No.2. 4. Consequently a direction is issued to both the respondents to formulate a scheme for regularisation and/or -2- according monetary benefits to the petitioner and other similarly situated employees. Needless to add, if required, State shall consult all appropriate authorities including the Central Government before taking such measures. Action be positively taken within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. Consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the scheme shall also be accorded to the petitioner. It is always open for the petitioner to place such material as may be found favourable before the appropriate authorities. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. February 23, 2011 (PK)