IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 2152, 2153 and 2154 of 2011. Decided on: April 20, 2011 1. CWP No. 2152 of 2011 Roop Lal vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 2153 of 2011 Sher Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 2154 of 2011 Sushil Verma vs. State of H.P. and ors. _______________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Haresh Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A. G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) These writ petitions are filed with the identical prayers, one set of such prayers is as follows:- “a. That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner to be re-designated as pump-operator in facts and circumstances enumerated as above. b. That the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation for considering the case of the petitioner to be re- designated as pump-operator.” 2. There will be a direction to the fourth respondent/competent authority to take decision on Annexure P-6, representation(s) in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. 2 3. With the above observations, writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice April 20, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja ) (pankaj/bss) Judge