IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6715 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 6715 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 6715 OF 2006 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6716 OF 2006 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6717 OF 2006 Harish P. Ramchandani .... Petitioner (M/s. Raj Waines) versus Dattatraya T. Bansode & anr....... Respondent. Smt. Veena Thadani for the petitioner. Shri A.K.Suryawamshi for respondent no.1. Shri Satyajeet Mirojkar for Girish Godbole for Respondent no.2. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The Consent Terms are placed on record in all the three writ petitions, which goes to resolve the dispute between the employer and employee. Under the settlement the employer had paid Rs.72,000/- to each of the concerned employee. The learned advoctes appearing for the respective parties pray that the writ petitions be dispopsed of in Consent Terms. Hence writ petitions stand dispposed of in Consent Terms. The employees are personally present in the court and they admitted the contends of Consent Terms to be true and correct. In view of the disposal of writ petitions in Consent Terms, the interim order passed by this court stands vacated. ...