IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17843 of 2009 1. SHEO SHANKAR SINGH S/O LATE TULSI SINGH R/O WASILPUR, TOLA KAJICHAK, P.S.- ARWAL, DISTT.- ARWAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF HOME, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE COMMANDANT, BIHAR HOME GUARDS JEHANABAD 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ARWAL ----------- 2. 09.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The only submission on behalf of the petitioner is that so long he is on the roll of Home Guard he is entitled to be considered for allocation of appropriate duties under Rule 12(1)(i) of the Bihar Home Guard Rules, 1953. Learned Counsel submits that even after his release on bail, for what he alleges as false implication in a criminal case, he has been allocated duties and unless convicted it cannot operate as a disqualification. Let the claim of the petitioner be considered by the respondents in accordance with law within a maximum period of eight weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. It shall be open for the petitioner to also represent for his alleged arrears for the duties already performed as Home Guard when it is expected that it shall also form part of consideration by the respondents within the like period. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)