IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9163 of 2008 Between: 1 Addanki Sreerama Chandra Murthy S/o. Naga Raju R/o. Shanivarapupeta, Eluru, West Godavari District. 2 Maddipati Suguna Rani W/o. Bhadrinath R/o.Kowali Village, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District. 3 Vemulamanda Satyanarayana Raju S/o. Subba Raju R/o. Gundugolanu Village, Bheemadolu Mandal, West Godavari District. 4 Kodali Srinivas S/o. Gopalakrsihna R/o. Eluru, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, West Godavari District, Eluru. 3 The Tahsildar, Peddavegi Mandal, West Godavari District. 4 The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in acting upon the petitioenrs representations dt. 17.04.2008 and 18.04.2008 for taking necessary action in accordance with law for protecting their life and property in an extent of Ac.2.87 cts, Ac.2.00 cts, Ac.2.00 cts and Ac.0.77 cts in Sy.No.135 situated at Dondapadu Village, Peddavegi Mandalam, West Godavari District, is highly arbitrary, unjust, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Article 14, 21 r/w 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently directed the respondents to consider the petitioners case for protecting their lives and property in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRP.RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.9163 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 08.07.2008 VGSR