IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1901 of 2006 RAMDEO SAHNI Versus NANDAN SAH & ORS ----------- 2. 14.5.2009 Heard. After having heard Sri Nand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, I am not inclined to hold that the order passed on 8.9.2006/11.9.2006 by the Execution Munsif, Muzaffarpur in Execution Case No.17 of 2002 was illegal. As such, the revision petition appears meritless and it is dismissed. However, during the course of hearing of the present petition, it was pointed out to me that the appeal is pending before the Additional Sessions Judge,6th, Muzaffarpur and the petitioner had approached the appellate forum with two successive petitions seeking stay of the execution proceedings in the years 2003 and 2005. The court is inclined to direct the Additional District Judge, Muzaffarpur to take up the hearing on those petitions and dispose of them as early as possible. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )