HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHg BILASPUR w.p. gs} No. 5359 or 2007 mt. Rama Chatteljee, aged bout 68 years, “W‘l’ov Shri Deobrat Chattcrjee, Resident of R 1 Vmoba %njay-pmsm, lane- Nagar BI]aspur(CG) ‘ Versus 7 State of Chhatu'sgarh, ‘Thxnugh- Secretary, Department éf School Education; Mantralaya, J D.K'.S.- Bhawan,‘ Raipur- (C.G.) The District Educau'on 0&cer Kama, District K’o‘ma (C.G.)‘ Adminishator thmugh’ Principal, Lahri ’ Multipmpoée,‘ Higher Secondary School > Chirmirii, Dxstnct Korea, (C G) The Dlrector Dnectorate Publlc ‘ Instmmon, Pensxo Bada Raipur, (0G,) WT PITN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA REONTS SPDEN Appearance. Shn R K Jalswal counsel for the penuone hn Ajay DWIvedl, Panel Lawyer for the Stae, on avance S t d copy. > ORL- ORR ’ (14.09.2007) UNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. ‘ 3 _ . Heard on admission. The‘petitioner is claiming the benents of recommendation of 5th Pay Commission, at par with the counter part in the Government Institun‘on It is submitted that the benehts of 5th Pay Commismon was to be granted With eEect nom 1 1 1996 m ccordance w1th the Madhya Pradesh Rev1s10n of Pay Rule a s 1998 S . \a - , \ n' ‘ PETITIONER RI ETIO r A DE 2 w.P.(S) No. .5359 of 2007 r This Court by judgment and Older dated 6.2.2007 in case of Smt. At Lall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005) held that the teachers working in the Government Aided Schools axe enu'tled to the benem of recommendah‘on of the 5th Pay Commission. The petih'oner has claimed for same relief. Leanled counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make representation before the concerned authorities and the said authorities may be directed to considerthe representation as has been ordered in many cases. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if so advised, the petitioner may hie representation before he concerned authorities Within a period of 3 weeks hum today long‘with copy of this order and copy of order passed-in.W.P. o. 4108] 2005 and if such a representation is hled that shall be ecided on its own merit in accordance With law in light of the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in th matter of Smt.‘ A.‘ Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and othe connected matters (Supra). osts. The peh‘tion is accordingly disposed of. No orders as t Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge \ é é .‘’q i vatti J j, t I t a N d e r o C