¥ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$¢ARH AT BILASEUR’ :1 DB: Hon’ble Shn Dhlrendra Mlshra & r Writ Pemlon (C) No 6950 of 2010 Petitioner I Late Shn Sunder Lal Dhakate R/a Housmg Board Colony, Padnabhpur " Durg, Dustrict Durg (C G) < Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through —- The a ‘Secretary, Department of Techn ~ Education Mantralaya D K.S Bhaw f ”Raipu The Director Department of Technlcal e Education Chhattlsgarh HQ - Bayron t Bazar Ralpur Chhatttsgarh " r ¥ Respondents Chhattlsgarh Swami Vwekanand L Technical University Bhllal Through ‘ Its Registrar North Park Avenue Secto 1 - Bhl|a| Dlstnct Durg(CG) “ 4- Bhllal Institute of Technology (B I T) e Through - Its Principal Bhllal House _Durg, District Durg(CG o r ) ' Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution sot-India Present Shn R K Kesharwam counsel forthe petmoner Shn YS Thakur Deputy Advocate General for the ‘ State/respondent No 3 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10 12 2010) Per Dhirendra Mishr‘g.‘ {J Heard. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been denied admIsSIon for semester to the Master of Engineering course by the W\>\“re\sondent No. 3 on the groundthathe Is not possessingmrnimum p ‘ I ‘I Dewnath Dhakate aged~41 years, S/o ' S ma a r ‘ 55% of marksyin B.E.‘ examination, vide, order dated 29.09.2910 (Annexure P;5). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner» ; obtained 1484 marks out of 2700 matrkse(Annexune P—1):.in’ theag examination just one mark short of 55% i.e »1485;~~The issueha‘s already been considered by this ‘Court‘in, W.P.‘(C).No. 7125/2098 e Technical Unlveristy and others), wherein aggregate-marked - 49.77% in 10+2 examination has been treatedvas-~50%v and the = respondents-university were directed to give admissionto»the«---:v=~'v petitioner in Bachelor of Pharmacy courseawi u ‘ > 3. Thus, following principaiof Imvliaidrdown in~the aforeeaid; judgment,- a ~ the petition is allowed and the respondent-universityet-is2direete¢4to a consider the case of the petitioner by treatingt<2»54.96% marker a~ Bachelor obtained by the petitioner in Bachelor air/Engineering coyrse: , a equivalent to 55%,v'subject to fulfill of other conditionsw r’ x a igx, 4. C.C.‘tod_ay. Sd/- Sdl— ~ were“? RANGANATH CHANDRAKAR ‘ ‘ ' Dhirendra Mishrai V Judge Judge Vitav