WP(C) 4775/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI The challenge in the writ petition is against an order dated 7.8.2007 by which the contract granted to the petitioner for construction of an office buil ding has been rescinded. According to the petitioner, the delayed execution of t he work was on account of lapses on the part of the Respondents in furnishing ne cessary drawings etc., which had disabled the petitioner from executing the cont ract work in a satisfactory manner. Not only that, the materials on record would go to show that by letter dated 27.7.2007 the Respondents made available to the petitioner a diagram and required him to resume the work within 7 days from the date of receipt of the letter. According to the petitioner, the diagram furnis hed to him was only a part of the requirements and that the work could not be re sumed within 7 days on account of heavy rains and water logging in the area wher e the construction was being raised. To support the said fact the writ petitione r has enclosed several photographs, which are marked as Annexure-13. The above facts leave the Court satisfied that the adjudication sought by the pe titioner would require appreciation of several questions of fact which, will be inappropriate for the Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Const itution. Writ petition, therefore, is not being entertained. However, the petiti oner may approach the Civil Court having jurisdiction in the matter, if so advis ed. Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the above.