HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION No. 26217 OF 2010 Friday, the Eighth Day of October, Two Thousand and Ten Between K.Vijaya Bhaskar Yadav Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, B.C. Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others Respondents ORAL ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) Assailing the order dated 2.6.2010 passed by the third respondent in Rc. No.999/A4/2010 rejecting the case of the petitioner for absorption as Hostel Welfare Officer, Grade II and the issuance of notice in O.A. No. 5839 of 2010 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, on the application filed by the petitioner herein, the present writ petition is filed. The petitioner herein, after undergoing selection process, was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on 4.7.1995 and on requisition, he submitted his willingness for appointment as Hotel Welfare Officer, Grade-II in B.C. Welfare Department and accordingly, he was appointed as such on 27.11.2002 and discharging duties as such, since then. While so, though the Government issued Memo dated 19.5.2009 framing guidelines and also issued GO Ms. No. 23 dated 2.3.2009 amending the Rules who are working in the B.C. Welfare Department on deputation for absorption and regularization, the District Collector has not taken any action in that regard. Hence, he filed O.A. No. 1180 of 2010 before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal and the same was disposed of on 2.3.2010 directing the District Collector to pass appropriate orders within four weeks. Since no orders were passed, the petitioner filed Contempt Case and the impugned order rejecting the claim of the petitioner came to be passed. Aggrieved by the said rejection order, the petitioner filed the present O.A. and the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, without granting interim order for the continuation of the petitioner as Hostel Welfare Officer Grade-II, ordered notice on 30.9.2010. Hence, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare. Since the writ petition primarily assails the issuance of notice and non-granting of interim orders to continue him as Hostel Welfare Officer, Grade-II, we do not propose to delve the issue on merits. We are not inclined to admit the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies open to him in law. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ____________________ Justice G.V. Seethapathy October 08, 2010 MAS.