1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 300 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 326 OF 2006 (Pradeep Tarachand Nihate vs. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.S. Mardikar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondent. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. MAY 04, 2011. Heard Shri Mardikar, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Mirza, learned APP for the respondent. The learned counsel for the applicant states that as the applicant is in custody since 2004, the hearing of the appeal be expedited but as the paper books are not ready, the applicant be permitted to file relevant documents and appeal be heard. Looking to the above facts, the following order, in our opinion, would meet the ends of justice. Paper books be prepared by the office expeditiously. As soon as the paper books are ready, the appeal be placed on the final hearing board. Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.