IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2010 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 285 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33312/2009 Dated 03/12/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WP(C): ---------------------- PARISHTHITHI SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHY, PALLIMUKKU, REP. BY ITS SECRETRY JACOB JOHN SHAJI BHAVAN, VALLIKUNNAM.P.O., PUTHENCHANTHA, MAVELIKARA. BY ADV. SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN WPC : --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VALLIKUNNAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY PANCHAYATH OFFICE, VALLIKUNNAM. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNOOR. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, VALLIKUNNAM. 5. INDUS TOWERS LTD., N.H.BYPASS, MARADU.P.O., REP. BY PREM KRISHNN NAIR, LEGAL HEAD. 6. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M/O. TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. BY G.P. SRI.SURESH BABU BY ASST. S.G. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHA FOR R6. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ R.P.No. 285 OF 2010 in W.P.(C) No.33312/2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010 O R D E R BASHEER,J Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any reason to allow the Review Petition as prayed for. There is no merit in any of the grounds raised before us. Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissed. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk