THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.19016 of 2004 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter, dated 23-03- 2009, stating that the petitioners seek to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. In view of the letter, dated 23-03-2009, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 24th March, 2009. skmr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19016 of 2004 Between: 1 Mirank Parekh, S/o Sri Anil Parekh, R/o Plot No.22, Balaji Enclave, Secunderabad. 2 Smt. Anita Parekh, W/o Shri Anil Parekh, R/o Plot No.22, Balaji Enclave, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Secunderabad Cantonment Board, rep. by its Executive Officer, Secunderabad. 2 Sri P.V. Ramana, R/o Plot No.26, Balaji Enclave, Transport Road, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the first respondent in initiating action in pursuance of the Representations/complaints made by the petitioners about the illegal encroachments/constructions made by the second respondent in Plot No. 26, Balaji Enclave, Transport Road, Secunderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the first respondent to forthwith act on the complaints lodged by the petitioners and remove the illegal encroachment/constructions made by the second respondent in Plot No.26, Balaji Enclave, Transport Road, Secunderabad; Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following :