{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.273 OF 2005 Ambadas Baliram Gaikwad PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.V.P.Kadam, Advocate for petitioner (Absent) Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. For respondents No.1 to 4 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 25th June 2009 PER COURT: 1. Perused earlier orders, which indicate that whenever called out advocate for petitioner was absent. Hence, notice was issued to the advocate for petitioner. Inspite of that advocate for petitioner absent. Contempt petition dismissed for default. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/cp273-05