^ ^^'•i^^M-f •^e^^^^-;^•;^^^s';3' IN THB HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR W. P. (Si No. f ^ OF 2011. PETITIONER ^^<^·': y^-'.y .-•' ..••~ .'v' ••" -»•' ^'•' >'••' ..•• ^ ^- ^' >^\Z9".\'^r cp'. •/w\\y <?-• ^" yr y' ^•^. '^,^/ 'SN?'»SS" Mahesh Kumar Verma, S/o. Shri Dukhu Ram Venna, aged about 55 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Kosrangi, Block Arang, District Raipur (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDBNTS "assanfe;. / : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School EduGation Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ^ 2. District Education Officer, Raipur, Dista-ict Raipur (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Arang, District Raipur (C. G.) .^ 4. Treasuiy Officer, Treasury Account & Pension, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) 5. The Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School Kosrangi, Block Arang, District Raipur (C. G.) ^^aife-- ^s£s^^^^^^^^ ^^ !Eai mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR &B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (S) No. 1989/2011 PETITIONER : MaheshKumarVerma Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh and others Appearance: Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF ESDIA ORAL ORDER (15.04.2011) The petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay ofRs.100/-. A&er completion ofprobation period, he was granted regular pay scale. (2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat tfae issue involved in the case is as to whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion ofprobation period. (3) The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukcmt Yadu and56 otfiers Vs. State ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly sitaated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. * ^ 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme L ^1 Court upholding the decision ofthe Tribunal to the efiect that fte Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entitfed to regular pay scale from date ofinitial appointment. (4) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhafttsgarh & othen [W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy ofthe petition andannexures witfain a period of ten days, raising all their grievarices and in tum the concemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period 30 days from the date ofreceipt of the representation. (5) Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all his grievances and in tum, the concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. (6) In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- PrashanfKumarMishra Judge Y^