THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 4192 OF 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner was employed as a Secretary in the Varahi Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Ltd., Vedurupaka village of Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, the 1st respondent herein. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, by serving a charge sheet. The 5th respondent was appointed as enquiry officer, vide order dated 21.1.2008. Alleging that steps taken by the 3rd respondent, in appointing the 5th respondent as enquiry officer, and the acts and omissions on the part of the 5th respondent in conducting the enquiry, are contrary to law, the petitioner had approached this court, by filing the writ petition. While admitting the writ petition, this court passed an interim order dated 28.2.2008. On behalf of the respondents, a counter affidavit is filed, together with an application to vacate the stay. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation, and learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3, have addressed extensive arguments in support of their respective contentions. The fact, however, remains that the 3rd respondent passed an order dated 21.3.2008, dismissing the petitioner from service, and the petitioner, in turn, filed W.P.No.9040 of 2008, before this Court. Once the disciplinary proceedings culminated in an order of dismissal, the various objections raised by the petitioner, as regards the appointment of enquiry officer, or the procedure adopted during the domestic enquiry, fail into insignificant. At the most, the petitioner would be entitled to urge these grounds also in W.P.No.9040 of 2008. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, leaving it open to the petitioner, to urge all these grounds in W.P.No.9040 of 2008. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ 3rd July 2008 PAN