IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 24505 of 2002 Between: 1 A.P. Industrial Tnfrastructure Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, 6th Floor, Parisrama Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad-4. 2 The Regional Manager, Regional Office-I, (Zonal Manager), A.P.I.I.C., Ltd., I.D.A. Jeedimetla, Hyderabad-855. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 M/s. Jairaj Ispat Ltd., Rep. by its Executive Director, N.Venkateswarlu, a Company incorporated under Indian Companies Act, Having its Regd. Office at 11-8, Jatendra Mohan Avenue, Calcutta-6, Factory at Plot No.8, Phase-III, I.D.A. Jeedimetla. 2 The Esate Officer, (Appointed under Section 3 of A.P. Public Premises Eviction of Unautorised occupants) Act, 1968, Office of A.P.I.I.C. Ltd., 6th Floor, Parisrama Bhavan. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ to set aside the order dated 20.3.2002 passed by the I Additional District Judge, R.R.district in C.M.A.No. 124 of 2001. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.SIMHADRI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.V.NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following ORDER: Ms.C.Jhansi Rani, Advocate representing Sri K.V.Simhadri, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 11.06.2009 kdl