..... Petitioner Mr. Vineet Chadha, Mr. Lokesh Suldrwani, Advs. with petitioners in person. ...... Respondent Ms. Afsha Pracha proxy for Mr. Pawan Sharma, SC for State with SI Hari Singh PS Chhawla. Mr. Chayan Sarkar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA oh Cr1.M.A. 1982312011 ORDER 22.12.2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(_CRL) 175712011 & Crl.M.A. 1982212011 (stay) By this Petition the Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 35/2010 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Chhawla, Delhi on the complaint of Ilespondent No.2 $-2s * IN THE HIGH COURT + w.P.(cRL) t7s7 /20rr RAJEEV RAWAT & ORS Through VETSUS STATE & ORS Through The complainant/Respondent No. person and is identified by her counsel. w.P.(cRL) 17s7/2011 OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 2 Ms. Sangeeta Rawat is present in She states that the Petitioners and ,) page I of 3 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlernent, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2lcomplainant has been dissolved by u decree of divorce on 17th August, 20II. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2,thePetitioner No. I has paid { 4,60,000/- out of which T3 lakhs have already been paid to her and remaining arnount of t1,60,000/- have becn paid today in Court by way of a draft bearing No. "201089" drawn at ICICI Bank, Delhi. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pulpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No. 3512010 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registered at PS Chhawla, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby w.P.(cRL) 17s7/2011 page 2 of 3 quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition and application are disposed of. Order dasti. wr"fu DECEMBER 22.2OII 'ga' M)-^ f'w J i ut"'* h& {^^4- ?",l,tr'+rlt" tTTo'lA L @s.tq€tl "t hot 't w.P.(cRL) 17s7/20r1 MUKTA GUPTA,J o -";"J DJ)' Y.'ftw- \,6o, !4r\ lJl, 2rl og1 oo)[ - ..- +t ("--f ^# '..L. z- page 3 of 3