IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9866 of 2010 BINAY YADAV SON OF RAGHO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 384, 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act and ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act and 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The petitioner was refused bail on merits by an order dated 7.11.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.No.31071 of 2009. I do not think there is any good reason to review my earlier order. In view of such, the prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it expeditiously considering the seriousness of the nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )