^ ?!IGM<^OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Division Bench) Coram; Hon'blc ShriJagdish Bhaiia, Ag.C.J. & Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnUiotri, J. Writ 1'ctition Mo, 1651 of 2005 Petitioner Versus Respoudents 1, Maanmati W/o Rasiikishun, aged /i2 years, Caste - TeU, R/o ViUage - Koshalpur, P.S. Ramaiiujnagar, The. Siirajpur, Uistt, Siirguja (C.G.) Slate of C.G. through Secretaiy, Departssient of Hoinc, D,K.S, Bhawaa, Raipur (CG) 2, Superiatendent of Police yurajpur (CO) 3. Station House Omcer Thaiia Ramaiiujnagar, The^ Suraj'pur, Distt. Surguj'a QFFICB REFEREKCE AS WRIT PETITON Sxat, Hajiiida Siddquc, Advocate appcars as Axmcus Curiac, Shri V. V. S, Murthy, Deputy Advccate General for tiie respondente/ State, OKAL OKDEK (Passed on this 2nd day ol'Jaiiuaiy, 2008) The foUowing oral order ofthe Court is passed by Hoa*b2e Shri Jagdish BhaSSa. Actissg C.J. Since the petitioner has sent a letter petition but at the subsequeiit stage fhe petitioner has fited Writ Petition (Crimiiial) No, 6665/2007 with tlie speci&c prayer, fhe letter petitioii with the general allegation has become infructuous, It is dismissed as havuig become iafnictiious. However, the order passed io. this petition shaU not alfect the merits of fhe subsequent petition. For the purpose of record let this petitiou ?3e placed aloiig with fhe paper book ofthe V,7.P.(Cr.)No. 6665/2007. Rs. 2500/- is aUowed towaixls professioiial fee of leamed amicus curiae. Tlie State is directed to clear the sajme. Tnakur Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge