1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAZ No. 665/2010 in L.P.A. No. 15981/2010 in W.P.No. 2102/2010 Smt. Vatsala w/o Maroti Patil vs. Shri Shrikrishan Radhakishan Vyas and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. R.R.Gaur, Advocate for appellant. Mr. A.J.Khan, Advocate for R-1 and 4. Mr. P.S.Tiwari, Adv. For R-3. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE & MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ DATE : 1.2.2011 It appears from the application that the applicant was ill due to diabetes and was taking naturopathy treatment. It is true that the certificate does not cover the entire period claimed by the applicant. However, having regard to the nature of illness and treatment, we find that there is sufficient cause for delay in preferring this appeal. The application for condonation of delay is allowed subject to the payment of costs of Rs. 2500/- in favour of the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within two weeks. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE patle 2`