IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.22618 of 2011 Date of Decision. 06.12.2011 M/s Shri Balaji Rice Mills Bagha-Tark Narwala Road, Raman Mandi, Bathinda its sole proprietor Sh. Parshant Goyal .....Petitioner Versus Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Department of Food & Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Anil Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Markfed, which has supplied the paddy is seeking to recover the cost of goods entrusted to the petitioner. The petitioner's grievance is that this is against their own express terms revealing the petitioner of any obligation to mill the paddy and deliver to them. The petitioner will be at liberty to seek for appropriate redressal through an inference to an arbitration since the respective obligations of parties are governed by contractual terms that includes the clause for arbitration as well. The petitioner petitioner shall be at liberty to take recourse to arbitration and the intervention sought through a writ petition is rejected. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 06, 2011 Pankaj*