IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37261 of 2009 UMESH THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 5.1.2010 Heard. On a plain reading of the complaint petition which is the basis of the FIR drawn up under Section 156(3)Cr.P.C. it is clear that the occurrence took place some where in Punjab and further that the deceased at that particular moment was residing with her husband. It is not denied that the present petitioner Umesh Thakur who happens to be the father of the husband was not present in Punjab and was rather present at his village Baikunthpur, P.S.Rajapakar, District-Vaishali. Considering the above facts, let the above named petitioner, either in the event of his arrest by the police or surrender in the court below, on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Rajapakar P.S.Case No.101 of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2)of the Cr.P.C. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )