XI—HC-22 3mm ..;.<:x-..v:9.:..7.é.£../.o;..‘j Wm “200 r: Laanlad C01111S€1 far th€ 19a; gic‘cused N‘adumm has already 1 §u£gment dated 09§05[2Q08, th ‘ £§i1a11y heexd azif‘ disimwd 0£ ‘ i ’~ Cansigiiarmg the abeve $11} Gamma} for Q16, partitm. ' §ivz§§§em gawk, : ' Emx’%yie §§wi .Eimtice LC. wzmi Hgg’bie shgi Justice {LE Shiva, 2%! 1 .1. f &QQ5 ' 8133i Ysgash P311d€y, counS§ Shxi U‘N,S. Des, Additiona r B'y this; a1313€al th'a Bhakalu ha$ gus‘stimled thE leg §asaad by kemmd First «Acadia Jagdalpur in Sassion$ Trial NC 11 Fist Additional Setssionsg Sech‘on 302 read with Secticm 3: Penal Coda, cogwictad each 0f t1 $611t€nC€d than to uxldargQ imgkzris RS.5OQ,!- sash in dafault of gmiy‘ , 3’ & Eta‘va“ J; :1 for tha appellant. k Fuhh'c Presacutor for tha Stata. 1i€$ submit that tim ataxia} of Cb.— men dacided by this Ceurt vid€ :rafem, this appEal may also hr: xmiszéiGnS ws hava haard 1€€d11€£1 l {QRAL JUD€§MER§E (W xx ality of canviciicxn and SalEEAC€ 31181 S€saiens Judgg, Bastax at )4 of 2001 by which th€ lemled after, the accnsed/ appellant along with Nac'hlram guilty of the. oifenco undor $211911 Section 201 0f the. Indiem mm untiar th€ said Sactimls and .oi2.m€nf far life and tc pay fma 9f malt 0f film t0 furtlmr underge accuwd f a13p€11aut Baliyar Judge V holding [@W \ XI—HC- 22 ligaroug implisonnmnt for six months and to unclsEgo rigorous to pay £136 of Rs.200/— fach, in Its farthar mldergcv rigomus V’ V‘Xmre dimct‘sd to run ceilculTeritly r€spectivaly. 130th 1:116 8e11E11C€S imprisonmant for two years and default 0f 9ayment r of‘r film imigrissgnmegt for threa mollths , 2k KL wahtramu‘fathm‘ of decaasged went to Polico Chowki, Vishrampur along with Samgallch Ramlal, Bhanwar Singh Emd Mainuram and tho hicharga, Police Chowki with waS working Witli Bhanwar Smgh Yostarday might at about '7 to 8 . p.m., afteg‘ takmg dmner h€ left, 1 gag/d. today mogling at about 6 -7 that outgide his small gardaxl th€ The bod th 'raoeivmg this mfoanation, Vishrampurij KK. Mighra teem} was tiad. aromld tho neck of dé hamging by 111:? ropa. Thom was waist of thi: doceaSEd. Two Shem at thgxsito. It appoezred that L1 accuaad — Naéu'. He. hat} a doul? Boasd on this Kaport, tha Chowlé gtving goticf: (EX JP! 3), ho pnepg \ . r t i1] briétf, is that on 12g'1’2g'2000 Théi 9r05€cuti011 c336, gavo marg mtimation (EXP! 1} to tho allega‘rion that 111$ son Nvaaru and. ho nood’to (liivo his tractor. on a tamemhad 116a ha houga along with Nadu Gond 61.31., Amarv Singh informed him body of his son Noam. is hagging v is touchmg the ground. On e Incharga of Police. . Chowki, 6d tho sito aod saw that a ropo coasod Noora and the body wag a plastic cootainer tied with the: do and ono T— shirt were also lying 16. shawls and the T—Shii't am of V t that Neeru had been miii‘dorod, 'i liiohargo went to the. site. After ted Palichnama of the dead body Wow XI-HC-22 mastsd Vida EX.P;'7, T113, daad mart€m arid m' tgm §Gs€ 111011 'BhaIzaHya, T116 §3ost mortfnn Ench .g‘g’s. mellt a Marg intimation *iw‘t infmmatien mpm‘t (EXP! ‘ mime d5ta§1$ “ware: recordad £11 ‘ 011%: shawl aud (ma T-3hi1t war! site vide. EXP] 15. T131: plasstic c A tfm rup€e no $ {EXPf 2) arid 51.36 §3repa§ed Pane Semde BaEiyag 311d a black full f; 31 accmsad Naduram Vick: EX,P,’5. Accns€d Naduram was body of Naéru was 3611i for laesi €111 was canductad by’Dr, GR. mport i$ EX.P!8, The Chewki Vick EX.P{9. Basal ox; that tlm .0 65 P] 11}, was 1“€gis;t€r€d. ThE 3mm detailS form Vida EXP} 14. x iaken ints iiessassian from thé ontainay and the ropa Wom takau {rem Sahodam Bai v'ids EXP] " if: was: also taken ilito possession iIiyEstigai'tioaJ hagwoheet was iilod agaigst tho accusgd’ pamong. \ 1112mm of th€ stgot (EX.P,’4). 013$. pant wam takgn into possassimi. £11m pQaSESSienz 7 ax1d after complotifion of tho onz£ a a) Loarned Ad inst tho. accused persons for tho ogances under Soctions 302 aiid 201 of the Indian Penal Coda. The. accusoci persons deniedthe (:haxges recoriis, {yamsii tho chaxgos age Eoosions Judgo afigr perusiug th Tho statomonts of the. accuood .N undor Sootion. 4) The prosecutioh in. order to prove the offence against the accused oersons examihed in all seven Wimesse‘s at the trial. 1§€ESOHS §€ISQHS W€I€ I€CO1£C1€d Thev ' 313 of the Code of Ciiininal Procedure.- Wow o A i o. . XI—HC:22 mm L t ‘ my W 2m mmmw I; ’4," m'm1?wm ' .aa’avmm ~s pleaded igilorzmca amd Said that fahdy implicéted m this; casa. 5) T115 leamsd ‘Additiol Q17 argumauts 0f lazumed Addi r.. lgamxd comlsd for tha accusavi §6m0ns §3éssad 1316 imyugnai £ gud gmaat. ‘ 6} Wg have hEayd accusadg’agiaellant and Em Add . Stata, péemxs'ed th€ 3x1dgm€nt~of availabla can mcord. « 7}/ Leammd counsel fa: that them is 110 evidelics in this; upon tha Timmy 0;? 15:31; $65.11* T11 to Shaw, 313$ k x. (mus-ed and t tjma hawmg styamad mEati’Grg 2 wegk {333$ 9f avidancg and w ciréumstanxia; afidencg fléo ctCumStemces of the Gaga m5 c cm Qhs hasis gf that widenca. , u‘ amamlgf the CQ—accusad has‘ alr‘ 4. they ar‘a innocknt gmd. hewa b85211 131 S€S$iong Judge. after haarmg {£01123} Public Pmsmutoy and thq ’ lamixs the cmm$el : fox itisnal Public Ptosmutcr far §h€ tbs trial Court 311d £115 avid€i10€r ths accusedgagxpeE'cmt 112w arguEd Cass. The, pmsgcution has relied 3m is 110 ohm evidénca which gaes 11f: dacaased wag at any point‘of thE lasi Exam €Vid6nce iS a V6137 ut cm‘mbaratiml by any Qmer to 1d. ccusgd canuot ba hgld guilty (mly S116 g’éégf‘érther aygmed that tha .a' .y bmn dgcidsd‘by This Cami, the v presmzt facts [@W d m d i ki o 8) 01a tha ether head, laggfisd Additional Public PmSaCutor fer th€ r€3§aném1HState sup}3m’£€d’ th€ judgméat of €11 . trial Court. ‘ r Th3 fact of The. Emmi :inial naztum 9f the. d€ath 0f Nam‘u ‘ « 533 naf b€€n disuguteé by tha c3un$€E fer th€ acmmad/agpallag . Ayart fwgi; that, the. evidéncg of P‘Nf5— DLGR. Dhagfliya is to tlm affact 315$ Ely: inéury “79$ ante. mm‘mm in natum and thaw waS ligamra mayk around tha mick mid C10tt€€l blead wag pafmxlty Thé mark sf ths $0136 an the. ngek of £116 decaased wa$ 2.5 c131 ix; width. Th€ faca was in SWQE .11 conditmn. Tlm tallgue “13.5; bawagn 11% met H6 113$ capmgd that thg cause {if daath af the dawaaed was; &3}3hyxia du€ to stremgulah 011 by {0136, Tharefom, i3 viaw of th€ sfatamsxm 0f thta doctgr, i‘: is €Stablish€d that €116 Eaturf: Gf th€ daath 9f tha d€C€a$€d was u» micidal. 10.} As fay a3 the invel mant'ef tht: accusrsé] a§§€11a11t in entiStion iS ccmceri Ed, théra is 110 direct evidancs to {:Qmmct +316 acc11S€d with €1 cximg. The whole. casa of th€ §rGS€CL1tion mStS 0n thf: circu “stautial avidanm ia, 1a$t $6.613 tham‘y and 1'1} grder >to - pr V6: the agence against The aecesedfgppellzmt based e1 cimumetaetial evidence, the wcee ‘utioa hag t9 pmve the c_.me egainst the accused] appellant ae eer the settleé pyme'iple lei dawn by the Hon’ble Apex Couit i.e., in a caee haeed e11 circa that .crima 1.. \ tggtial‘ evidence befm‘e the Court [‘fFEW } 1 v . 1. : .......;........... ..... f .....m .......... W’w1iwwm - wa;mnanés1 p» atisfy itSeLf {that circumsiaricas 1k cauld 1m tirawa hava 136x311 i7€11C€ lad by the. g‘osecutiorl aiid athér am got enly of a conclusive L11 so fully as ts un€1§~mg1y §oi11t :1 and ara 11st Cgpablé 0f any 611$ wit} tha hyphoth€SIS (3f €116 a ‘ 53:1 Eacoa‘ti canvictic13., ii gust s {mm which an iizfayencs 70f gm aStaEEishad. by unimpeachahle evk flag; a1}. the cimumstancss. pgt t§g aaiurs bw: al$G complsta the aha S5§11y m th€ guili bf the accuSf: €§§§lagati011 which i3 11m ammis‘x gv‘ilt sf tha accasad‘. So far as $116 quSStiQ ‘1 0f cannecting thf. a§cuS€d with” sen th€01j is canmnled, Eon’bls reg wigs £Q£§aa mag aghgm ¥se $¢§@§-t£ei m {20024} 3 9 QC 45 @vidgince is not dirtéct t9 th€ point 3f Varimis other‘facts which are $0 E1 issue‘that takan tag€thsy they fmm which m6: axiStsnce of the pzixmifgal fact cam b€ 1€ga11y> mf€ rmd or prasumed. Fer a mime t0 1t the crime must be. seen to have. Circumstaacas 1m: yrowd by diract iota the court these {Jereens who 1.1g €116 cyimé: on fl}: basiS 3f last s the. Aimx i3 the matter of £s3$§a gtjaé‘a Lag”? Jgmma gageé; gaeigmg, bass held that tlm' CircumStantial in. issua but conSista of avid€nc€ bsaly aS$OCiat€d with 1h? fact {on}; a‘ chah1 3f circ1lmsta11c§s be proved it is not neeessaxy th: beers; committed and must, ix; all a idmme by examinirlg b ‘ Qcular .\ ,A Mew C XI-HC-22 mm WW w€rW WW ‘ mmmw ~ Q .— éVafa‘qm . haci sam1 Its comgilssien. *E‘hs Qii‘gucs can 13E. §Io§€d by cimumstgmtial evidsxlce gdsn. Tha Est ssan th€ory comes intG pk: whm‘e. thr: tmm—gap hetvm'gn 1h? gmint 9f time: whcnihs accusé'd u .‘ alld €116 {lscsaseid Wrirét S€€11 E513? ah've gmd whal the accuscrl was fouryi déax‘; i$ 30. small that yess§bimy of any person othar than the acea$ed haing ‘thfz autlmr of thr: crime. hacomes‘ impossibla. It ‘ a , weuld b6 ditiicult in $om€ ca$€s t0 pcssitivgly agtabHsh that the. dsceased. was last scan with 1:116 accused wheg there is a long gap $36; possibility of othar persons ‘coming in bemetm exists. in L116: 'abaaECf: of $13? othm“ positiw evitkgca t0 coilclude tha‘t' th€ actuS€d aiad the d€cea3€d W€rq last Sean tOgether, it would be hazardcus to conplude guilt in thi‘osa (iasES. .- v 12.) In the mattsr of 151dbhgsh €§m¥a§§ i750 $41k Q; £§Fg§£€mm, reggrwé is; {£002 Court has held that tcx cans itute. ’thg avidmme of Iést seen tyogether} the avidsnce must d e‘ drawn that the victim and flag accused was scc’n‘ togethcr at a i $§C “fag, Han’ble the .Agmx itsly permit a1: mfsrmlce béng {11% w‘ ‘ 1, I m‘mmw QQ‘, 13} Ba$€d 9:1 the abov u f . . {amd‘egca 111 the. inesent (Jaw, .\ 14} gomg to watch TV and when she thgt 011 the. fatEfLil day she was with thg thu€ and’data 0f the: gsmtg‘f timE. i1}. class ‘91‘0Ximit3' cammissiml 0f cIyilue‘ ‘ r decaased ham (1%}3osgd Lhat’lmr £ n 111 the nighf at about 8.00 gm. grim: to mcarding of hm“ avidence . e. minciyla, if W6 axamme tlm PW;3 — Jligbati, (mathxer Qf thE. 30:1 had diad abeut six manths accused. Naduxam arid Baliyar Cmne to her resicknce axld called Next bagging eiaesition: In the arose the accusal persans arld'her son Néeru ware friénds. Them was 11 3 Strained relatioxx or quarrel took §31ace betweea them. Sirlce 2 — 4 years the accused persons were when the accueed persons called Ler seri she was in the house. i (311 earlier occasions they used to call my son ahd take 11:13:} alog with them. Neey; aEld iheyeafter they tea}: him along with them. maym‘ilg he}: gm} was feund ‘m gxéminatioa shf: has statgd. that friends of hereon: At the time a . r [new PW/ 4' Sulochaha, time of deceased Neeru. has stated XI—HC—22 1 mmmw ¥ Pk ‘ ‘ ‘ r mmitww hwfmm " he saw tht: aécueéed persdns and :6 0f Mainu censuming liqacsrt Naeru in a (k ad canditisn, She fux’rhar stated it! gm $€e Naeyu gmd th s accused. persogg quamaling. In V f .tion $111: has stasd cm} ‘umigg the. liquei: but Sh€ 5 d evtamg mm kh€ hGu'Sa night 9J1 Ccused ahé ths deceased cama to V thg thrsa ga‘arsens Qamely th€ r watchiag .I V s 1 was r§£1yi1i11g aft€ $€C€asad Naaru. at tha msiéam Themafmr sht‘ saw ghat Shea cl L11? Gross‘exami11a mat she had mat $6611 them {31591155 aild. the _,_ aw flm accused 9 : 6f Maiuu, a A dgceax PW;5 — Maiml has étgited that on €16 fateful h, 41. m e37 took Otm hattlg of his housa consumad h'quor and. thaaaftar th. liqmar fer Ra.10/— 311d left his heuse. Becauss ah the mres gasrsohs insistsd him, therefori, h€ also censumsa the liquor, 1n sta§€d that the dsceassd Neeru and {wuss Naduram took the: Wmé and _ ths cross Examination he. has t aduram came. ta h1s ths Elon'ey w in a llsavily d111, pr0§sy13x aecussd N and Nesta Wars It t0 Walk as alss givsh by him. Both Nadtuiam 11km: tenditio: t. and Vvsre nOt in a gasitio \ M/ )EI—Hc-zz mwifwm %a11?‘lwa11%$r ‘“ _ 16} ‘ Onv‘dm fair Scrutmy t i$ thaia tha daceagmi left his 1191.13 thmtafter Sulechana saw a ‘ and the. 110119; é: of Majxm zmd'Majnu ha ew § f and dgcziaSEdr / Na€113 wam m . a ‘ has furthar 3ta£€d that m ems}: A ‘ . ' appeHamt is aoncenled) ha ha€1 :1 . Thaw is Ila a‘JidtanCg which g6 ' thaa {1€C€a&:€& and the. accu$€d W st&i€:{§ that bath the deceasvagl di‘unkml cand Warg in :1 hsa‘ii‘g? tamd that $16 accused axjz gsvmr noficad any Saamad 1:61 quamlmg. 1n. 1:316 agarge‘s‘hm dtmaaised mad thg aCCuS€d 1.;se dnmkmi canditicm $01116. dis; illsraaftxi‘r Lh€ accasad persons TQ *luQ affacti the pr0§ecutim how thse. IhVE$tigatj11g Ofticer ( .\ evidalce _ 3fth€ widenm, the only 3 along with €113 accuged 1g£yS3ms 3i the threg persoim agitating ink) s stated that accuggd Naduram aavily clnmkml candition gmd 11:: 3c far as; pm$em at seam with Naduram and N€€ru. 3 to Shaw thatduring this péxjod 33:6 naticad quarmh'ng. Maiml has. a Ne‘eru 311d accusezi #1 Naduram itien. Tha mather 9f the: £1§C€a$€a tbs d€c€a3€d ways frimlds 311$; 51:16. $1011 batW€€n th6m 1101" saw Them at it hasheal mentioimd that ‘Lhg t :1 to bn'ag call—girk emd durmg the ute tocsk placa batman them and mttrdemd Neaxu by the. nylon repe. L‘haS not adduce§ ‘amy 6§i&et1c€ that tuna to this canchlsicn and if it was s axamimatien \ Withwi SD $161 why any avidalme. mgai‘ng that tEey calla! 'tlie call—girls has not b€€11 adduC€d Witheut wh ich no iniktl’arica‘. éall 1.3g ‘drawn. ‘ r .) 111 viaw of the. abové evi§1€nCE of Mainu {PW/5}, ths r€$611t asexisadi emfmHallt had riot came. with N€eru emf} Naduram at hi3 missidence, th€r€fbr€, the tlworybf 131$? saan togethar hag net a ‘ ' b€€n aSiablishcd. Thf: m1ations of the. accusedfappallant with Naaru warts not Straiggd. @d hé vas Qafn along with Naduram‘ ill m asceased and thamafter \thc t S€€n in. thg compaxly 0f Naaru. , {HESmAt ascusal! appdlgmt was; i AS’per $vid€nc€ 0f Maiuu (PW{ Mainu has stated that N€6ru Enid; Naduram wwe. i11_a‘heavi1y inkan cm1dition and thare is no d n " “t 1 “:51 $ M t thé evaning by the mother'bf 1 1 1 , 5 a 7 Mww‘ E‘ ' other mammal on mCQrd )0 W11 ch i11f€r€nC€ caxl be drama thm . 1am was an accasian to th€ p6. €11t accused] appellagt to inVolVF: himssLf in cpmmittmg the mufé‘ Vr 0f Ne€ru. There is also 110 §vid€11c€ to tha Cffsci that tlmre. ;% 110 possibih'ty of third pmgoa coming m contact with the dec‘aa‘ed Neerg between the time when > he was last seen with the aceuee i [ a§pellemt at 8.00 pm andwhegl 13L, . deem}, body was, faund 111 . the :130111111g . m . hallgmgcondmmn > l . . . ‘ an. v a [ww V z wawA di XI—HC—22 tamarmd txatz The prosecutiom l grave thg offagdcré‘. agajn$t th§ ac. the. 01kt circums‘f nec $16! as g 1‘0 f ,1 119w 110% b€€11 a} 61’ s :a nag no* b€en qhk to €s+abha 1 Emd :usadi’ a13p€Elant measly basal Q11 r m” t1€ ‘33? blmhf‘d unnaple th€ ;1€t to cemigleta cf “circamstar 0° which p€r3uades CCUS€d 1% th? 0111‘? nersolw m2: sear; th€0ry £11 and. the facts ' circamastggc that, th€ accused is thé 011.1y pafiaen W119 c0mmitt€d the murdfsr of flw mC€c§€d Em§ i ‘ 14km? fba r‘sm mitt€d thE murder, DLE9 E1 121$ 1201‘ EX ’D« But from the evidellce Cf Meijn’u (WV! 5), it has: tome 911 reconi that t1“? ineqer’r accusedj'ipeellaut u as not wLth Naduram and Neeru [/w/WA t 6v camL to hls houss flaimad t1} at whey tbs? chat; £116 Can‘t ta tak€ a VIEW that tha ,Dansiblg fer thE murdgr 0f the. any thmlagh $116 1as1' _ as of th€ ca$€ :10 concmsnm {11f m “(‘€ can he drawn llties; thare. is n9 pessibility that “ll I) 033?}; ide oi“ anybody Else has T116 accussdgrttppdlant in hi5;- stakment 1 s simply pkadgd ig110ra11ca ab Gut the. death of the deceased and they departeel from each other. L€CQBS€ri ELmsF‘lf Com mlttd s11 MéW' ‘ XI—HC—22 ,W - mam m J . ......................... mm W 200