1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 516 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 516 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 516 OF 2002 Union of India & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. Mr. Amit Jain. .. Respondent. Mr. R.R. Shetty for Petitioners. Mr. G.K. Masand for Respondent. WRIT PETITION NO. 180 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 180 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 180 OF 2008 Union of India & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. Mr. Anilkumar Agrawal. .. Respondent. Mr. D.A. Athavale for Petitioners. Mr. A.D. Shetty i/by Jaiprakash Sawant for Respondent. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2008. DATE: 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2008. DATE: 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. . The respondent has filed an additional 2 affidavit. On going through the additional affidavit of the respondent and particularly the order dated 29.1.1996 annexed to the affidavit as Exhibit II and copy of the Central Government’s letter dated 17.12.1998 Exhibit-III and having considered the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rao Somashekara and ors. vs. State of Karnataka and another, reported in AIR 1998 SC 97, we find that there is no merit in the petitions preferred by the Union of India. The same are, therefore, dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.) (K.K. Tated J.)