IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc M- 6323 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.4.2009. Baddhan …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent Present: Mr Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr KC Gupta, AAG Haryana. S.S.SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks regular bail pending trial for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 478 and 471 IPC. The FIR has been registered on the complaint received by Ran Singh Inspector, State Vigilance Bureau, Gurgaon. Inspector Ran Singh investigated inquiry No.36 dated 29.10.2002 in which the allegations were that the petitioner had sent Imran son of Shubhan Khan to Dubai by alluring him of good a job. Imran had been sent in connivance with an unknown travel agent of Delhi by preparing forged documents and by taking Rs 80,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. It is submitted that the petitioner is alleged to have received a sum of Rs 80,000/- in October 2000. Thereafter, Imran Khan was sent to Dubai in the month of October 2000. Thereafter the Cr Misc M-6323 of 2009 2 petitioner compromised the matter with Imran and had returned Rs 33,000/- after he brought the same from the travel agent namely Guddu at Delhi. Thereafter, Imran became greedy and had lodged the FIR. In response, learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner had got false visa prepared and the Embassy of United Arab Emirates, New Delhi had informed the Ministry of External Affairs, Govt of Inida that the entry permit of Imran son of Shubhan Khan was not correct. After giving my thoughtful consideration to the matter, it may be noticed that the petitioner is in custody since 6.2.2009. The FIR has been registered on 7.12.2004 with respect to the occurrence of October 2000. The trial in the case is likely to take time. It is yet to be established that the petitioner had sent Imran out of the country after receiving Rs 80,000/-. In the circumstances, the petitioner on his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Magistrate, shall be admitted to bail. 22.4.2009 ( S.S.SARON ) ASR Judge