IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE THIRTENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.11546 of 2009 Between: Smt. Noorjahan Begum … Petitioner And The Inspector of Police, P.S. Madhapur, Cyberabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Thakur Chetan Singh Counsel for respondents 1 &3: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 11546 of 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.2, as illegal and arbitrary. The grievance of the petitioner is that at the instance of respondent No.2, respondent No.1 is threatening her to vacate the property admeasuring 100 square yards in plot bearing No.264 in Sy.Nos.32 to 38 of Siddiq Nagar, Gachibowli, Serilingampally mandal and municipality, Ranga Reddy District. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.1, it is inter alia stated that on the complaint of respondent No.2, which was filed before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad and referred to respondent No.1, Crime No.656 of 2008 was registered against the petitioner under Sections 452, 453, 454, 447, 448, 506 IPC and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., that in connection with the said criminal case, the petitioner was arrested on 05.01.2009 and she was released on bail by the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad and that charge sheet was filed on 18.01.2009. It is further stated that the son of the petitioner filed O.S.No.36 of 2009 in the Court of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy district, which granted an order of status quo in I.A.No.124 of 2009. Respondent No.1 denied the allegation of the petitioner that he visited her house and threatened her to handover the possession of the land to respondent No.2. He denied his interference in connection with the civil dispute pertaining to plot No.264 of Siddiq Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of the present writ petition, respondent No.1 stopped interfering with the petitioner’s property referred to above. In view of the same and having regard to the categorical denial of respondent No.1 of his interference in civil dispute, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the writ petition in the event of interference by respondent No.1 in the civil dispute with respect to the abovementioned property in future. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.14866 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 13.07.2009 ES