IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 3336/2010 Pachisram Versus State of Rajasthan through PP 7.4.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr KK Bhinda - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena , PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that on account of dispute of common way petitioner has been implicated in the matter and civil suit for the aforesaid matter has also been filed. Petitioner is being harassed only on that count. Thus, he may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Sri Modhopur District – Sikar is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Pachisram in FIR No. 241/2009 registered for offence under Section/s 341 and 376/511 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv) He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma