IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 OP.No. 10353 of 2002(G) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.P.RAJAMMA, HEAD CONSTABLE(HC 4128), VANITHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM, NOW RESIDING AT MADATHIL HOUSE,VAIKYAPRAYAR P.O.,VAIKOM,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.J.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,TRIVANDRUM. 3. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRA ZONE, ERNAKULAM. 4. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM. 5. VALSALAKLUMARI, HEAD CONSTABLE (HC 4129) VANITHA POLICE STATIION, ALUVA RURAL, ALUVA. 6. AMMINI, HEAD CONSTABLE (HC 4131), VANITHA POLICE STATION, KOCHI CITY, KOCHI. 7. MOLLIKUTTY, HEAD CONSTABLE (HC 4136), VANITHA POLICE STATION, KOCHI CITY, KOCHI. 8. MADHAVI AMMA, HEAD CONSTABLE (HC 4527), TRIVANDRUM. 9. K.K.RADHA (WHC.370), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE) PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 10. K.SUMANGALA DEVI (WHC.397), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 11. P.J.ALEYAMMA (WHC-761), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE), IDUKKI DISTRICT. 12. K.S.OMANAKUTTY (WHC-579), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 13. V.R.USHAKUMARI (WHC-836), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE), PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 14. T.A.PADMINI (WHC-1478), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 15. C.S.RAJAMMA (WHC-765), WOMAN HEAD CONSTABLE (THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE), IDUKKI DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY FOR R5 SR.GOVT. PLEADER K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== O.P.No.10353 of 2002 ================== Dated this the 30th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T This original petition comes in the defect list today. The defect is that service of notice is not complete. The matter earlier came up on 20.2.2009, on which date, I passed the following order: “Petitioner offers to take out notice by special messenger to respondents 9, 10 and 11 to 15. The petitioner shall take out notice by special messenger to the above respondents in their correct address within two working days. Post next week.” The petitioner did not take steps to comply with that direction. In the above circumstances, this original petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== O.P.No.10353 of 2002-G ================== 30th October, 2009 J U D G M E N T