IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.112 of 2005 AMAR NATH MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 10 17.12.2009 The case has come up at the instance of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that in the second and last paragraph of the order dated 13.07.2009 due to inadvertence the words “respondent nos. 3 & 5” have been recorded as “respondent no.5”. Accordingly, let the words “respondent no. 5” be read as “respondent nos.3 & 5”. The time indicated in the said order for filing the represented is extended by another six weeks from today. The order dated 13.07.2009 is modified to the above extent. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)