IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 19179 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ SAJEEV, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN MAREEKAL HOUSE, KUZHOOR DESOM KAAKKULLISSERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH P PODUVAL BY ADV. SMT. RAJITHA.R. RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DISTRICT OFFICE, SAKTHI NAGAR, POONKUNNAM THRISSUR,PIN 680 002. 2. THE HEALTH INSPECTOR PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, KUZHOOR, THRISSUR-680734 3. KUZHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.540, P.O.KUZHOOR, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-680734 4. THE PRESIDENT, KUZHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.540, P.O.KUZHOOR, THRISSUR. R1 ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS,SC,POLL.C.BOARD R3 & R4 ADV. SRI.LAL.K.JOSEPH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MM WP(C).No. 19179 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1st RESPONDENT DATED 08-09-2011 P2 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 08-06-2011 ISSUED BY THE 1st RESPONDENT'S P3 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2nd RESPONDENT P4 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16-06-2011 P5 COPY OF THE ANALYTIC REPORT DATED 06-07-2011 ISSUED BY THE HI-TECH LABORATORY, ALUVA. RESPONDENT'SEXHIBITS: R3(a) COPY OF THE MAHAZER DATED PREPARED ON 24-05-2011 R3(b) COPY OF THE EMAIL SENT BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF KERALA ENVIRO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD DATED 23-09-2011, TO THE 3rd RESPONDET R3(c) COPY OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST DATED 27-09-2011 TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE MM ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 19179 of 2011 V ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The main complaint in the writ petition was regarding the pesticides stored by the third respondent Society near to a well in the petitioner's residential premises. According to the petitioner, on account of the storage of the pesticides, water was getting contaminated and, therefore, the writ petition. 2. It is now submitted by the parties that, during the pendency of the writ petition, the pesticides have been removed from the site and, therefore, to that extent, the grievance in the writ petition stands redressed. However, the petitioner wants the well to be cleaned and drinking water provided to him in the meanwhile. It is stated that, seeking the aforesaid reliefs, petitioner has already made Ext.P1 representation to the first respondent and that necessary action should be taken on the said W.P.(C) No.19179/2011 : 2 : representation. 3. Taking note of the aforesaid limited grievance and the pendency of the representation, I direct the first respondent to take appropriate action on the basis of Ext.P1. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/10/10 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge