-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIION Civil Application No.1632 of 2007 in Writ Petition No. 1207 of 2007 1. Mr.Brijmani Mishra and another ..Applicants vs. 1. Smt.Sushila K.Surana and other ..Respondents Shri Amol P.Mhatre for applicants Shri M.S.Lagu for respondent no.1. Shri R.S.Apte for respondent no.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 23rd NOVEMBER, 2007 23rd NOVEMBER, 2007 23rd NOVEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Mhatre for applicants, Shri Lagu for respondent no.1 and Shri Apte for respondent no.2. 2. Perused the Civil Application and reply. Although, belatedly, the challenge is raised to the orders of the Executing Court dated 27th April, 2005 and 27th April, 2006, interest of justice would be subserved if the petitioners are allowed to incorporate the challenge to these orders in the writ petition by amending the same. Amendment would obviate multiplicity of proceedings so also assist the Court in -2- effectively and completly resolving the controversy between the parties. However, amendment being belated, the petitioners to pay costs quantified at Rs.2500/- Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Post the petition after two weeks for reply. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)