IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1335 of 2008 SATYA PRAKASH THAKUR Versus RUDRA NARAYAN PRATAP THAKUR@RU ----------- 2 22.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error inasmuch as what has been done by the court below is that substitution has been allowed. Having perused the tenor of the impugned order, this court is of the view that the court below was wholly justified in allowing such substitution. As a matter of fact, this civil revision application is itself frivolous and accordingly the same is dismissed. shahid (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)