IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 19851 of 2008 Between: G.Satyanarayana, S/o. Veeraraju, R/o. G.Medapadu, Samalkota Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, East Godavari at Kakinada. East Godavari District. 2 The Revenue Dviisional officer & The Presiding Officer, Land Reforms Tribunal, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 kante Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Viswanadham, R/o. J.Thimmapuram Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 4 Kante Papayyamma, W/o. Late Viswanadham, R/o. J.Thimmapuram Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5 M.Vijayalakshmi, W/o. Masina Satti Raju, Mattam Centre, Samalkot, East Godavari District. 6 N.Veera Raghavamma, W/o. Bhaksara Rao, Katravulapalli (V), Jaggameta, Mandal, East Godavari District. 7 P.Suseela, W/o. P.Satyanarayana, J.Timmapuram, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus or any otehr appropraite writ or order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in discriminating againstthe petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and violative of ARticles 14 and 15 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider acceptance of the land offered by the legal representative of the declarant in lieu of the land in S.No.136/5 of G.Medapadu village sold to the petitioner in the year 1978, in-terms of his order dated 08-01-2008 in LCC NO.2300/KDA/75, In the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GIRISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 19851 of 2008 10-06-2009 Oral Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with a view to make a representation to the 1st and 2nd respondents to accept surrender of alternative land by the respondent Nos. 3 to 7. Granting liberty as sought the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 10-06-2009 Pvks