1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No.112/2009. : : Kum. Hasina Begum Vs. Sh. R.Venketeshwarn & Anr. : : Date of Order 27.2.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. V.K.Sharma for the petitioner. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 10.9.2008 passed by this Court while deciding the writ petition. By the aforesaid order the respondents were directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of the representation in the light of circular dated 28.12.1989 and subsequent circular dated 21.6.1990. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that even though the respondents have decided the representation on 17.12.2008, but they have not correctly read the circular and the subsequent amended circular and the respondents have illegally held that the case of the petitioner is not covered by the aforesaid circular. 2 If that be so, it cannot be a case for contempt petition. The order dated 17.12.2008 gives right to fresh cause of action. The petitioner is at liberty to file fresh writ petition to challenge the order dated 17.12.2008. This contempt petition is accordingly dismissed and notices are discharged. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.90.