^^^: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review Petition No.23 of 2011 APPLICANTS: 1. 2. 3. Dr. Jagadish Prasad Banerjee, S/o Shri Gautam Das, aged about 53 years, Posted at Marwahi, Community Health Centre, District Bilaspur (CG) Dr. Prashant Jha, S/o Shri Naresh Jha, aged about 55 years, posted at Dallirajhara, District Durg (CG) Dr. Om Prakash Agrawal, S/o late Shri Sunderlal Agrawat, aged about 52, posted at Govt. Homeopathy Dispensary, Mainpur, District Raipur (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (CG) Director Health Services, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through its Secretary, Raipur (CG) Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ. ORDER IN CHAMBER (_7f./4/2011) 1. The applicants have filed this review petition for reviewing the order dated 18th November,2010 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.3259 of 2010 on the ground that the State of Chhattisgarh was formed as per the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Re-Organization Act, 2000 and the applicants' services were allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh. As per the provisions of Section 69 of the Re-Organization Act, the service condition of an employee applicable immediately before the appointed day cannot 7-.^ be varied to his disadvantage except with the previous approval of the Central Government, however, by the notification of Annexure-P/1 dated 23rd July 2008, the Rules, 1987 applicable to the applicants have been amended to their disadvantage, which was not permissible without leave of the Central Government. However, this point could not be raised in the writ petition and therefore, the order under review may be re-considered on the aforesaid ground. ^WWWWSSi^ 2. It is settled law that issue not raised in the main writ petition cannot be raised in a review petition for reviewing the order passed in the main petition. {Stateof Kerala and Others Vs. P.T. Thomas; (2005) 12 SCC 347}. 3. For the aforesaid reason, we do not find any substance in this review petition, the same deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed. Barve Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge