63 1 1 CWP No2914 tlf2010 e Itl the I lighCourt ofPunjabandHaryanaat lOateofdecisionll082010 1 CWI No914 012010 Virender Singll Vs StateofI7laryana aild othCrS 2 CWl No6427 of2009 1 Krishan Kunlar and olhers Vs StateofHaryallaand others 0 3 CWl No329 of201 0 0 RajbirSinghand othersVs StateofllaryansJnd othcrs C 4 CWl No1 4009012009 Prem Sitlgh Vs State ofllaryana ancl othlTS 2 m 5 CWP No 3401 of2010 r1 r2 1IC Kulbir Singhand anolher Vs StateofHaryanaand otllcrs oll 6 CWP No536 01201 0 KttplanSitlghVsStateofHaryanaand others 1 mmo 7 CWP No203 012010 Z Clm 10eshRajandothers Vs StateofHaryanaand othcrs 8 CWP No8147 of2010 15HCRanl Mehar and othersVs StateofIlaryanaand othcrs 9 CWP No6443 012009 C Jai Pal and anotherVs Stateofllaryanaand 01110rs 10 CWP No6619 of2009 SntyawanllC VsState oftluryunatlnd others 11CWP No04870f2009 llcad Constablc Ashok Kumar Vs State ofHaryanaand othcrs 12 CWP No 12237 002009 Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 64 CWP Ncl2914 of201 0 2 d NarenclerKumar ConstableVs StateofHarvanaand others 13 CWP No12248 of2009 JitSinghEHC VsStateofHaryanaandothers 14 CWP No12253of2009 SubhashChandeEIIC Vs StateofHaryana and others 1 15 CWP No 6975 of2009 tr 0 Krishan Kumar EHC Vs StateofHaryanaand others Ca3 16 CWP No18430 of2009 C5 Panna Lal EHC Vs StateofHaryanaandothers 17 CWP No18863of2009 Z R Kumar and anotherVs StateofHaryana and others w Q 18 CWIN0189190f2009 t Kalnal Parkash EHC Vs StateofHaryanaand others 08 19 CWP No636 of2010 C0 C LadyConstable RajbalaVs StateofHaryanaand others 3 2 20 CWP No2775 of2010 Clm Rishi Parshadand othersVs StateofHaryana and others 21CWPN028750f2010 IaadyConstableSumanVs Stateofaryanaand othcrs 22 CWP N02968 of2010 6 Sada Ram EliC Vs StateofHaryanaand others 23 CWP No3338 of2010 KaptainSinghiind anotller Vs StateofHaryanaand others 24 CWP N 3367 of2010 EHC Mclhan Ial VsState ofIlaryanaand others Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 65 ll CWP No2914 tIf2010 3 bed 25 CWP No556 of2010 Ilatls Ram and otllcrs Vs StateofHaryanaand others 26 CWP N0425802010 Iiari Krisllan I1C Vs 12illanciaiColnlnissioiler 8 Iiiiloal tI GovernmcntofI1aryana and others 27 CWP NoA274 of2010 m Amar SinghEHC Vs StateofHaryana and others 0 28CWPNo7490f2010 C0 Mohinder SinghEASI and another Vs StateofHaryanaand others C5 29 CWP No765 of2010 e Chlju Ram and another Vs State ofHaryanaand others Z 30 CWP No 4960 of2010 C Rbir Singhand othersVs StateofHaryanaandothers 31 CWPN049630f2010 o6 0 Satbir SinghVs StateofHaryanaand others e 7 32 CWP No7923 of2010 Z Ll Jaivir Singhand othersVs StateofHaryana and others 33 CWPN06031 of2010 Iiardayal11C andIthers Vs Statc ofIaryanaand othcrs l G CORAM I4IONBlE MR JUSTICE PERMCOD KOH Presentl Mr SK Redhu MrVikraln SinghMrN Yadav MrOincsh Mllik MrPritam Saini Mrurender MrUO SinghAdvocatesfor thc petitioners MrRS Kundu Addl AG Hatyanafortlle PERMOD KO11Ll J Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 66 1 CWPNo291402010 4e 2 On the basisof common and identical issues b0thon factsand Iaw all thesc pctititlns are beingdecidedbythis commtln order hc ciltire controversyrelates to the of Rule 137 ofthe 1unjohPolice Rules 1934 as applicable tcI the StatcofHaryana and amcndcd vidc 1unjab Police HaryanaAmcildlllentl ules 2001 hereinafterrcfcrred to as the Rules1 This rule rclatcs to dcption r C 0 Lower SchoolCourse and for enlistingof the eligiblcofficers in List Bml C for their promotionThe amended rule subject matter of dcbate in the t5 present writ petitionsis hereunder 1 37Selection of candidatesfor admission to Z courses at the Police TrainingCollege l l List W r B 6inForm 137 shall be maintained by each r 11PcIlicc it slloll include thcl 06 CCJ namesof all consltIblcssclccted or adnlission to tlle Lower Scllool Coursc lo llc lleld tit the Z CL Police TrainingCollegeSclcctillil lo llc Iist 13 shall be madc 111 the molltll Ol Jtlnliaryeacll r17 1 yearandhall be limted to llle iItilllbcr ofscals 1 allotted to thc districl forlhe yeor lcilumbcr C of seitts in Lower Scllool CtlllrSC Ill il Ycar sh111 bc on lllc basis uf existillgvociillcics anci the vaCancies likelyto bc crcolcd witll itl onc year 111 the respectiveunit 55 o f the seats allotted to a unit in the Lwcr Sellool Course shaMbe Olled in on the bosls rIl iI coinpetitivc 1 Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 67 CWP N02914 of2010 5 examination 35 on the basis of cumfitness and 100Ioon the basisof consisteilt in Gold Or Silver Medal in All lndia Police MeetlNationalGamesor displiiyclf 0 braveryduringthe course of performance of 0 officialduty Selectionofpersonsagalst550 C seats 111listllower school on the basis If merit C5 shall be done by a Promotion Z Committeeon the basis ofl tm C V4 1 Examination of servicesand 08 2 A competitive test Ihereinaltercallcd I3ael Co Rr tesll111 vm Z L1 a9Prade bl Lawl andpracticalpoliceworklild 3 Allnterview 2il All collstiibles of tllcir C cducational qualiflcations sholl be cligillc lo 8PPearfor B1 lest if tlley are uilder lllc ngc of 35 years and hrve complctcd 5 ycars 01 servlce on 1 S day of Jillluaryof 1110yctll lll wloich selectloll is made Ielowever if ll Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 68 1 CWP No 2914 012010 6 J constable belongingto reserved category who is recruitedaflterattainingthe age of 27 yearsas per Governmentinstructionslorders thcn he shall bc allowcd 10 appcar f0r minimuln three consecutillc chances allcr m 0 offlve years of serviceeven if he 0 has crossed the age of 35 years up to a C Illllllmum of 10 years C40 Z i All Constables of their a educational shall be cligibleto C be broughtOll List B 1 senioritycum merlt 06 basis if theyare under the age of 40 years 0 and have 5 years of service on the V2 Z flrst day of Januaryof the ycar in which Ll selectionis made 94 The State ofH9ryanaissued instructions da1ed 130022007 the lnerlt to fulfill thc criteriti ftlr sctIirlrilyv 5 cummfitnessrelyingupon tle observalionsof this Court in tllc CIISCOl Ga Naresh Kumar Vs State clf Harvana and othcrs CWP Noo7952 If 20041decided Oll 051 1 004 lOircctor General of Policc I Itlryllllll issued these instructions prescribingmillimum bench morks 101 selection t0 BeI Iist under 35 quotti The relevant eAlrilcl 411llle instructionsdatcd I 3022007 P iil CWP No6427 01 Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 69 CWP No 2914 of2010 7 3 2009 is hereunder 3 In view ofthe Honble HighCourt j udgmclll 111the Naresh Kumar case supra it Ilas loecll decided to flx the bench marks for Otllesslllldcr 35Io CIllOlile 1111c m assessment of service record should bc nladc 0 C0 on the basis of education trainingcourscs passedcommendation certificates and length C of service etc as giveni11PPR 137 All the 4 Z candidates who obtain a minimum 31 marks e C or more would be deemed to bc fit fclr selection of I3l seats against35Io quota on thC 08 basis of intermseseniorityof the candidates and r t for all such candidates interse seniority would W Z bc the solc criteria for dcputillgOll lllcir lllrll CL under 35Io quota111VlCW clf the explicitorder of High Court Pleasc lake furlllcr iicccsstlry 7 actioil 99 The validilyof these instruclioillshas bcen uphelclllylllis Court in Hawa Siilh Vs StateofHaryonaand othcr Wi No1194 of20051decided on 14052008 Thcre arc lhrce sets ofwrit petitionSunder colosidcritllolle The same are broadlyca1cgoriscd 111the followingmanner a theeligibilityofthc candidateswllo iippellrccl in 55Io lllcrit Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 70 CWP No2914 of2010 3 1 9W1 quotaunder Rule 137 to be consideredforomotioll under35Io on senioritycunneritbasis under rule 137 621 even if theyhave failed under 55Io quota bl considerationof the candidateswith less than 35 ycars of age as on lst dayof Januaryof the year in which selection is lnadc iil 35Io n C quotaof 0 interse seniorityofthe candidates on the basis ofbench marks C C43 lll ternlsof DGPs instructionsdated 13022007 4 From the readingofRule 137 6l it emerges as follows Z a that55IooftheseatsallottedtoaunitinthelowerSchool Course are meant to be filled in on thc basis of coinpetiti ve 0 cxamlnation 06 bl 35Voofthe scats on tlle basis c l IO seats on l1lebasis of consistc olilstandiilg Ill mw Z CICe 0 Selection tlgaitlsl55Io quota lS lo loc nlo4Ic by the Promotionttl Coinmitlce All thc coilstablcs irieslocctive 1 of lheir educalionalclual i OctltitInWht1tlrc lcss111111 35 ycilrs tl l tIge ancl have 5 ycars of scrvice 011 lst dayof Jallu2Ir 411lllc ycar of C sclcction are cligibleto appear for 131 test undcr mcril seills of 55Io quota Similarly all tIlc collstiIbles irrespectivcof their educatlollal qlialiflcillionhnvingcomplctcdflvc years of service and in lheage of 40 yeors on thc lst dayof Janualyof the year of scleetion Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 71 10 1 CWPN029140f2010 9 4 are eIigible to be broughtOll list B on tlle basis of mcrit against35Io quota Sportspersons under 10Io quota 11rCto bc considered subjectto eligibilityprescri bed 111 tllc abovc two categorles m C The controversyrelating to the eligibilityof thc calldidates 0 who failed to secure the requisite merlt 111the cxaminatloll Ca under 55Io quota to be again considered under 35Io seniycun C merlt quota cameto be considered by a Division Bench of this Court Z ltl Naresh Kurnars case supra9 This Division Bench judgmenlWas before the Honble Court ln SpecialLeave to C t AppealCivillNo10409 of2005 which hasbceil dismisscd ill Iiinille ctj 01110052005 t A similar issuecame up for considcraticlilbclIre Illis Collrl Va2 Z 111 thc case of 1Iawa Singll Vs Sttttec11Haryatlaand otllcrs Wl 0 No1194 of20051decided on l40052008 Aftcr admissitIllclftllc Iviil pctitionbythe I loilblc Division Bencll the matter was consiclcrcd bya 1 letirned SingleJudgc of this Court for flnttl disptlsalIlll 29 I l 1106 he learnedSinglcJudgeofthis Court VVOSoftlle OpllllOll ccrlillll provisionsof Rulc 137 ofthe rules were not brought lt tllc rloticc of Ille Ioivision Beilch and On at isis a refercnce WtlS IlllldC lor consideration of the writ pctitionand other collllected nlullers Ily 11 Ioivision Bcnch of tllis Court The aforesaid writ pctitiotlClltllCltl be heardby a Divisioil 13cncllofthis Colirt Tllc Hollble IOivisitlll 13ellch Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 72 Il CWP N02914 012010 10 4 vide its judgmentdated 14052008 affirmed the rtIlio in Naresh Kumarscase supralwith the followingobservationsl In view of the facts lnentioncd abcIvc these wrlt petltlonsare allowed in the salne tcrms as 111 Naresh Kumars case Ipri The m C are directed 141 dcputethe 0 petltionelsl to the flrst Lower School Course Cao which will conlmence afer the pronouncement C ofjudgmentlll this case However The a Z shall be deemedto havc qualified 111 the Lower School Course from the date when C other constableshave qualifledwhose names otj Were approved lo undergo 1Iwcl School Cll 4 Coursevide selectIisl Anllexurc 1al It is nladc 7 Z clear that if loygetting clatc 0f CL paSSingthe Iowcr Scllool ClllfSC lhc becalneeligible for proinolitIillhen hc will gel only dcemcd hciIelits witlloul getting any actualfillancial beilcIllS iil vicw of Cm principle01 no work llo pay ilS lilid dowtl by lhcir ordshipsof llle 11011bleSliprcincCoull 1r1 Ulllon of ltldia nnd anolher vs 1ilrSelll Lal and others 10 SupremcColit1 COSCS 145 91 Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 73 1 445CWPN029140f2010 1 Ilonble the Division Bench further considered thc validityof the instructions dated13022007 and upheldits validitywith tIle fclIlowing observations l So for as CWP No6119 of2007 is cttlcerncd In thal writ petiliclilsclccl list preparcIto undergo e OWcr School Course Oll tIle basis tIl illslructions C 0 dated 13022 007 EIS refcrred to obove has bcen C As has been hcld earlicr obtlve said C5 instructionsare perfectlyjustiOcdiIncI ttre I rl 14f consonance with tlle dircctions issticd by tIJis Z Courtin NaresllKumorS COSC Il C The clEiimsof some of thc wril petitionersIcIr dcputillgto Lower School Cottrse have been rejected on thc grlIundlllill tlleyIlilving otj failedin 5596mcrit quotaare not entitledto be considcrcd ftIrlociilgbrclugllt on List Iel in 35 quota The claims ofsomc oflhc writ pctititlneis Iltivc 7 Z beenrcjectedfor bcingbrought in List 13 1 under3596quolti 111llle ground Clm lhatthey lvere of Iessthan 35 yearsof age 8S Oll Ist dly ol Jliilllllry tlf the vear of selectitln Iil some cases the claims hovc Iocenrccelctl for non 1 achievingthc tnitlinltlm 31 loenchmarksin tenns of the IOClIs iilsltlictitlllS dated 130220070 Iil Narcsh Kuinurs case 6supra1thc l ItInble Divisioil 4m Bencll ruled lhe eligibilityofthe conslables for lheir consiclcnition both lll 55 and 350 quolo his judginenthos attained Ollality lIle SlI Iliis also been disinissccl by the 1Ionble StipreineCourte Thc riilirl tlf tllc saicl judgmenthas been reiterolcd lIl Ilawa Singhscases Sllllral US ulso in Constable Dharmbit V State of Haryana and others 2009 IIIISJ 31O wherein lhe following clbservtltions havebeclrlinadel Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 74 1 CWP No2914 of2010 12 1 3 So there are three distincl clitcgclrlCSwith their own cjualiflcationsand rcllliirClnents for eligibilityfor consideration There is no bar to consideration of a constablc in any catcgoryif he fulfills the eligibilitycnteria l il Ile is c ligil Ie lll 1 C all three categorieshe has a statutoryrightto 0 consideration in all threecategoricsThe Rules CA do not categorize or requiresorne Ininlinum age C5 for eligibilityunder any ofthe categoricsWhat it I specifiesis the upper age Iiinit for consideration Z r under a particularcategory m C Despite these instructions certaln 1SSUCS referred to 4 hereinabove have agoincroppcdUpeThe conlroversyregilrdiilgthC otj eligibilityofcandidlltes ullder 35 yeors ofagcflIr beingbrt1tiiIlt on Iist13e1 CJO for 359oquota againcame up for collsiderationbyanothcr 13cilcll em Z of this Court in Dharlnbirs case suprill and I3alraiSingll110 4l L1 State ofHilrvanalitld others 2009 21RSJ 463 Iil Dhilrmbiis ctlsc Slllllal a Division I3enchoftllis Cclurt held os tlildcrl 17 U17e Aonioint readiilg01botll the 6 submruleswould show that onlythe llllllCrage limit 4 hos been 1rcscribed under the rtiles aild 110 nliniillUm age llas been prescribcclcltller Llnder submrule2 19 or suberule 2 ii9 whicll nleuns lhat ifa constoble fulfllls thc rcquirement 01tlle upper ogeand the Ilthcr quoliflcalitlnsprescribcd under the respectivecategory as per suberule 2 there is Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 75 11 1 CWP No 2914 of2010 13 no bar to his consideration under each of them Meaningtherebya constable who is eligiblcIll one categoryunder Rule 137 i l can also be considered in the other categoryunder Rulc 137 29 iil of the PunjabPolice Rules as tllcrc IS 110 1 r bifurcation between the rules EtS far llS tlle 0 eligibility 1S concerned with regardto the C ininimum age as none is prescribed C 18 The minimum age if prescribedby Wtiytlf executlve lnstructl ons would go against the Z lnterest of the Constables who are otherwise b L eligibleunder the statutory Rules Rule 137 iil cotlfers a rightwhich a Constablc attalllS on 08 tlle basis of his selliorilyin the service As nnd ao r whcn his turn comcs bascd on tlle senioritv i1 riiIlt am Z to considcraticln devolves on hiln his rigllttlll 0m thc basisof his senioritycannot Ic dcjlrivccl 4111llle basis clf executivc instructiolls This wcIuld be lll 1 COlltrltventl on to tlle statutoryrules 011c1lllcrclllre C not sustainable 22 What emerges from the above disclissitlns lS tllat a constahle who has colnplclcd5 yeors of servlce on lhe Ist day of JitnuarytIftlle ycur 111 wllicll the seleclion is intide is undcr lhe agc tIf 35 years and is cligible for considcriltion otld selection for includinghis llame in 1ist 13l of Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 76 1 1 CWP N02914 of2010 14 selectedconstablesfor admission lo l Iwcr School Course under thc 55Io quotaon thc llasis 0f rnerit as per Rule 137 62lilofthe PunjithPolicc Rules 1934 and having participatedin tlle test B and failed or was unalllc to get 1 enlistment due to lower inerit can alstl claim C considerationand selection under the 35Io quota 0 C on the basis of senioritycumlerit as per Rule 0 133 62 if he IS eligibleuildcr both the categones 97 Z As noticed above the constableswho have attained ITllnlmum C 31 bench tnarks undcr 35Io quotaha1Iebeen ignoredand thcir Juniors were deputedtcI tlle COUrSC Oll the groundthat thcyllrC 1110TC mcritorious hnving 08 betterbench nlltrks 1his issue is in fact cclllcted uildcl Ntllcsll Kliinills Cr case supral tilddmc to be cliirified in 13t Sins CIISS supral 2 Z wherein it has becn held that wlleremevcr i junior hiis Ilccil delltitedfoi Om Lower School Course ignoringthe claltn ofthe SClllors ITlcrcly 011 thc biisis of the hgherbcnch nlarks tlle SClllOr be deputedr thc course ond he will 1 7 6 be deemedto have passed the course from the datehisjtillltlrIlllS4luolifled 1a In such sitliation setlior will retaitlhis seniority 6ee Thcre is another aspect of the mattere Tlle 1001s instructions datcd 130221107 are onlyprospective ln naturc Prior to lIleSCIllStllIClltlllS no bench lnarks wcre prescribedunder tloe statutoryrllICS tllold tllus 011 those collstables who acquiredeligibilityprlor to issunnce of these instructions havc Iocendenicd the deputation 10 the Lower Schllol Course for non achieving the minimuin bench marks Il is settlecl Iaw thal Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 16 CWP No2914 of2010 5 government inslructions cannot overrule the statutoryrules hus thcse iilstructions cannot be pressed into servlcc to deprivethe conslables of their right for for not havitlgachieved the 1TllllllllUlll lcnch Inarksas prescribed under these instructions issued Iatcr Thlls Such of the constables who becaine eligiblepriorto issuanceofthese instrtictillils and 1 0 lgnoredfor not achievingthe nnunum bench marks are to he dcputed for 0 Lower School Course and on successfulcompletion ofthe COUrSC they are C0 lo be treated senior than their juniorswho were earlier deputcdlo the C ower School Coursc In other words theywill retaln thcir seniorityfor Z C beingbrought on ist I3 l that theyWCrC clcptiled for tllc Z course Iatcr thiin thcir juniorsor theydid not ilClllCVCIllllllllllltll beilch n C marks Sitnilarly such of thc coilstableswho llrC igIltlrCtl Oll lICCtllllll c1j of achievingIessthtInthe prescribedbench inarks thcn tlleir JUlllors are C C aiso entitledto bc dcputcd to the course and on coInplction 11lllc SOtllCwill amwo Z rctaiIl their scniority over Clm In sonle of llle wlt pelitionslhe cotlstobles Iltive tIlrcady completcdtllc 1ower School Coursc but thcy havc bccil dciiicd thc 1 7 seniOrityover their junors Oll tllc ground that 111e wct c eithcr havingbctter bench nlarks or deputed he course priclr ill lllilc lholl the V Wrlt petiioncrSe In view of tlle abtIve observas these wril pctilitlnerssholl be deemed 10 be senior to their juniorsdeplitedearlicr on ncctIliill of better bench morks lr 41r1 ony olhcr grtIundof eligibility tl sutn up lhcsc petitionsarc disposcdofwith the followingdirectionsl il Such of thc who hove failed ill 55 illerit qUtIlEi Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 78 1 r CWP No 2914 of2010 16 arc entitledto be consideredfor beingbrought on List B utldcr 35Io quota on the principleof senioritycummeritprovidedtheyhavc the requisite experience and are otherwiseeligibleunder the rules ii9 such ofthe constableswho were Iessthan 35 years ofagcas on theday oftheir consideration but not more than 40 years theywill be cnlitled to be 1 C brought on List B1 bydeputingthem to Lower School Coursc 9 0 iii the petitionerswho acquiredeligibilitypriorto the DGPs lllstructlollS Ca0 dated 13022007 will be deputed for the course without coils ideringthe C questionof minlmum bench marks as prescribedunder the government instructlons and in their cases seniorityand othcr eligibilily criteria Z undertlle es will beenough tIr their dcplitatiotl tcl tllc cotlrsc m C ivl tlle petitioners who becaineeligiblcfor llflcr tllc isslltlilcctll the instructionsdatcd 13022007 and lve achieved the initlnllIITl llcnch olj marks be deputedto the coursc theirjuniors htlve Ilcttcr Q bcnch inarks W2 vl iiltcrse seniorityof tllc constableswill be detcrinincd on tlle loiIsisc OL their seniorityin their respective districls in the and n411oll tIlC basis of passingof the Lowcr School Course in all such COSCSIvllOiIC 1 igtltlred by tlle iibovc di rections Howevcr thc inlcrSC SCll Itlrily tIf constaloles will nol be governedby the abovc dircctions whcre scluor wils Gna ignoredon account of pendetlcyof any disciplinaryproccedingsor who suffered any otller disqualificalion for deloutation to Lwer School Courscl vil deputationof the petitionersshall be lnacle 011 the basis tIf Illcir scniorityin their respective dislricts and ilgainstthe avoilablc vocanclCSe Let the claim ofthe petitioners be considered in the lighlof tlle abovc directions and their dcputationwhcre cver required be mode 111 Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 79 rl CWP No914 of2010 17 1 1 accordancewith the above directions A copy of this order be placedon the record of each connccted flIe p e e V 1082010 PERMOIO KOI1L11 13S JUDOI 1 C m 0 Note Whetherto bercfcnedto the YES C X C r ll kh 1 X 1 01 e4t otj e2 Z Cla Pooja 2014.05.07 16:18 True Copy of the Original PHHC, Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document