IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2011 / 4TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23309 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S. VICT PLY INDUSTRIES, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PLOT, ANDOOR, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SHRI C.K.P.MIYAZ BY ADV. SRI.DALE P.KURIEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER - III, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER (H.G.) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KANNUR. BY G.P. SHRI C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 14.2.2011 EXT.P1(A)-TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DT.10.1.2011 EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 3.5.2011 EXT.P2(A)-TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DT.5.5.2011 EXT.P2(B)-TRUE COPY OF DELAY PETITION DT.5.5.2011 EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 2.1.5.2011 // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.23309 of 2011-K - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of August, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is an appellant before the second respondent. The copy of the assessment order is produced as Ext.P1 and Ext.P1(a) is the demand notice issued for the balance amount and interest. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent along with Ext.P2(a) stay petition and Ext.P2(b) petition for condoning the delay. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for an early disposal of the stay petition. 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2(a) stay petition along with Ext.P2(b) petition for condoning the delay, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till orders are passed, the revenue recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/