1 903-cas-312-2006.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srj CIVIL APPLICATION NO.312 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST)NO.8292 OF 2003 Smt. Sukhanta D. Naikude & Others .. Applicants. V/s. Smt. Shantabai A. Waghe & Others .. Respondents. Mr. Machindra Patil, for Applicants. None for Respondents. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J. DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Advocate for Applicants. 2 This Civil Application is filed for condonation of delay in filing Second Appeal. Respondent Nos.1 to 6 are served. In so far as Respondent No.7 is concerned, while passing separate order in Civil Application No.313 of 2006, which is passed today, I have already indicated that the said 2 903-cas-312-2006.sxw Respondent No.7 had died even prior to filing of the Second Appeal and, hence, there is no question of service on her, more so, when Respondent Nos.1 to 6 are apparently representing the estate. The delay is hardly of eight days. The explanation given in paragraph 3 of the Civil Application No.312 of 2006 deserves to be accepted. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (G.S.GODBOLE, J.)