THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1436 of 2010 ORAL ORDER : Heard learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the docket order, dated 23.2.2010, in un-numbered I.A. of 2010 in O.S.No.1042 of 2006, passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District, rejecting the application filed by the petitioners to send Ex.A-1 suit promissory note to another handwriting expert for his opinion by comparing with the admitted signature of the defendants. 3. I have perused the impugned order passed by the Court below. 4. It appears that on earlier occasion, when such application was filed and ordered, the promissory note sent to the Expert was returned with an endorsement that those signatures did not follow the signature of the petitioners at the relevant time to express any opinion. It appears that no signatures of the petitioners at the relevant time were on record. Therefore, the Court below rejected the application filed by the petitioners to send the suit document to another handwriting expert for comparison and his opinion. 5. I am of the view that even if any opinion is expressed by the expert, the same is not a conclusive proof and the Court can arrive at a different conclusion than the opinion expressed by the expert. Further more, such opinion given by the expert can always be subjected to scrutiny by both the contesting party and also the Court. 6. In that view of the matter, I do not find any illegality or irrationality in the impugned order, dated 23.2.2010, passed by the Court below and the civil revision petition is liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 01.04.2010. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1436 of 2010 01.04.2010 (Msr)