-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 557 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 557 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 557 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1504 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 1504 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 1504 OF 2004 Sirajmiya @ Raju Malwala Mustafa Sayyed. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Ms. Anjali Patil for the Applicant. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & K.U. K.U. K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 04TH JUNE, 2008. : 04TH JUNE, 2008. : 04TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Applicant was convicted in the year 2004 and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment. His application for bail was rejected by this Court. This is an application for extension of the parole. There are rules already framed in such matters for grant of parole and furlough. It is not for this Court, in these circumstances, in an appeal to grant the same if either parole or furlough is rejected, contrary to law Appellant must exhaust the remedy available to him in law. 2. Considering the above, learned Counsel seeks to withdraw the application. The Application is dismissed as withdrawn. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)