IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 248 OF 2011 SR. IOVA DINIZ (PBVM) THROUGH P.O.A MR. BENEDICTO THEMUDO AND 7 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI AVINASH G. VAZ AND 12 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. J. Lobo, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 6, 10 and 11. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th May, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. D. Pangam, learned Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. J. Lobo, learned Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 6, 10 and 11. Although respondent nos. 7 to 9 have not been served, I propose to dispose of the matter in view of the submissions made by learned Advocate Mr. Pangam, that the petitioners would not press this petition if Regular Civil Appeal no. 497/2010 pending before District Judge, II South Goa Margao is disposed of expeditiously. Mr. Pangam for the petitioners states that actually the appeal was argued extensively and thereafter Advocate appearing for the appellants sought discharge and as such appeal could not be disposed of. This position is not seriously disputed by learned Adv. Mr. Lobo appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 6, 10 and 11. Mr. Pangam, states that the matter is fixed on 13.6.2011. 2. In view of the above, District Judge,2 South Goa Margao to dispose of Regular Civil Appeal no. 497/2010 expeditiously and in any case before 30.8.2011. 3. Writ Petition stands accordingly disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn