THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4663 OF 2011 29th October, 2011 BETWEEN: SRI.KATTA SURYANARAYANA .. PETITIONER AND SRI.VUPPALA VENKATESWARA RAO .. RESPONDENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4663 OF 2011 O R D E R : (PER THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM) This revision under section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 by the tenant is directed against the concurrent orders of the Principal Senior Civil Judge cum Appellate Court of Rent Control Cases at Visakhapatnam dated 29.8.2011 rejecting R.C.A.No.4 of 2010 and confirming the order of eviction dated 31.3.2010 passed by the learned Rent Controller cum IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam in R.C.C.No.30 of 2005 filed by the respondent/ landlord seeking eviction of the revision petitioner/ tenant from the schedule premises bearing Door No.50-49-43/A, TPT Colony, Visakhapatnam, a building consisting of a ground floor suitable for commercial purposes and 1st floor for residential use. The landlord filed the application for eviction on a plurality of grounds including willful default in the payment of rent and that he requires the premises for his personal use, for establishing a departmental store at Visakhapatnam and for residence for providing better educational facilities for his children at Visakhapatnam. The landlord is a resident of Chodavaram, a nearby town where he has a considerable business in oils. The Primary Tribunal found against the landlord on the claim of default in the payment of rents by the tenant but held in his favour with regard to his personal requirement of the schedule premises, and directed eviction. Aggrieved thereby the tenant preferred an appeal. The learned appellate Tribunal concurred with the primary Tribunal on the bonafide requirement of the landlord, of the premises in question. No error let alone a substantial error in the application of law, appreciation of evidence or exercise of discretion by the courts below is discernable, warranting revisional interference under section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960. This Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission after hearing Smt.N(P) Anjana Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.T.S.Anand, learned counsel for the landlord/ respondent/caveator. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 29th October, 2011. TNB THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4663 OF 2011 29TH September, 2011. tnb