IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13732 of 2008 Date of decision: February 10, 2009 Zile Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for respondents states that the recovery order has been withdrawn as it has been found that earlier pay fixation was correct. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute with this fact. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. February 10, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia/ashish JUDGE