CRA/76/2007 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 76 of 2007 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= RAMNIKLAL PITAMBARBHAI DARJI - Applicant Versus ANIL NARANDAS NEGANDHI - Opponent ========================================================= Appearance : MR SIDDHARTH H DAVE for Applicant: MR RC KAKKAD for Opponent: ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT Date : 14/03/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Shri. Siddharth Dave, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has received instructions from the petitioner to pray for CRA/76/2007 2/3 JUDGMENT some time for vacating the premises in question and to withdraw this petition. The petitioner is ready & willing to file an undertaking before this Court to the effect that within the given stipulated time the peaceful possession of the premises will be handed over, and during that time the regular rent which is payable shall be paid on or before 5th day of every month and in the meantime the premises in question shall not be in any way encumbered or make any modification in the premises. Shri. Dave submits that 18 months time from today may be granted for vacating the premises. 2. Shri. Kakkad, learned advocate for the respondent submits that, in view of the above statement, he would not object to such a request, but he submits that let there be a condition incorporated in the order that no further extension of time for vacating the premises may be sought. 3. In view of this, the petitioner is permitted to occupy the premises on the same terms & conditions for a period of eighteen months (18 months only) from today, on the condition that the petitioner shall file an undertaking as stated herein above within a week from today before this Court, with a copy to the other side; and shall abide by the terms of undertaking, and keep on paying the regular rent CRA/76/2007 3/3 JUDGMENT on/or before 5th day of every month and shall vacate the premises on expiry of a period of 18 months from today. 4. With these observations this Civil Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged. Ad- interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated, but with the above said observations. [ S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ] /vgn