IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 30563 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ VARGHESE V.T., VAZHAKALAYIL HOUSE, PANCODE P.O., KOLANCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ARUN PETER SRI.AJEESH S.BRITE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTHENCRUZ POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. 2. SHIBU VARGHESE, R/AT.KUTHIRAPURATH HOUSE, THAMANIMATTOM P.O. KOLENCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. MANOJ, MANGARTHUMPADIYIL HOUSE, KARUKAPILLY, KOLANCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. AJI, NEDUNGADU HOUSE, KARUKAPILLY, KOLENCHERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. MATHUKUTTY, CHANDATHADATHIL, PATHAMILE, PUTHUPANAM, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SR.GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K. VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.30563 of 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- Pius C. Kuriakose, J. This writ petition is remaining in the defect case and the learned counsel for petitioner sought for further time to cure the defect. But we notice that in this writ petition seeking protection for life of the petitioner for plying the Autorikshaw belonging to the petitioner this court had issued an interim order on 30.10.2008 recording the submission of the respondents that the petitioner is presently plying the vehicle without any obstruction from any other side. Eventhough time was sought for on 30.10.2008 for seeking instructions for the petitioner regarding correctness of the above submission and time was granted, even now the petitioner is not able to apprise the court as to the correctness of the submission made. We are sure that the issue has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous noticing the interim order dt.30.10.2008. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb