1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2221/2010 Mohan Lal Sharma vs. Chairman & Managing Director & Anr. Date of order : 29/3/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Hawa Singh for the petitioner. ****** Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has approached this Court with the grievance that his pay has not been stepped up by the respondents at par with his junior S.L. Yadav, who with effect from 6.9.2001 has been receiving higher salary than the petitioner. The comparative details of service particulars of the petitioner as well as Shri S.L. Yadav has been given in para 3 of the writ petition to show that petitioner was appointed earlier in point of time than Shri S.L. Yadav and that yet as on 6.9.2001, he started getting Rs.7,600/- as salary as compared to Rs.7,425/- which is being paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that in case of eight other employees where a similar anomaly arose, the respondents on their own have 2 remedied their grievance by passing the order dated 17.10.2005. The action of the respondents in not according similar treatment to the petitioner is discriminatory of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. Instead of directly entertaining this writ petition, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation to the Secretary (Administration), Rajasthan Rajya Vidut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., Jaipur raising all those grounds, which he has agitated in the present writ petition, who shall examine the representation submitted by the petitioner with particular emphasis on the contention whether the case of the petitioner is identical to that of eight others who were already granted stepping up of pay by order dated 17.10.2005 and in that light decide the representation of the petitioner within three months from the date of its making. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/