/•n- $-36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLM.C. 2391/2011 MAHESH BANSAL & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: jVir.S. D. Ansari & Mr. I Ahmed, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through: Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP for State. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER % 28.07.2011 1. On the complaint of respondent Nos.2 & 3 Mahesh Kumar Saini and Smt.Suman Lata Saini, respectively, case FIR No.94/2010 was registered at police station Civil Lines, Delhi under Section 420/ 468/471/120B Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the petitioner No.l Mahesh Bansal and petitioner No.2 Abdul Mateen. 2. Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State submits that the investigation is at the advanced stage and charge-sheet has not been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that that the matter has already been settled between the parties and the respondent Nos.2 & 3 do not wish to pursue this case further. 4. Respondent Nos.2 Mahesh Kumar Saini and respondent No.3 Suman Lata Saini are present personally in the Court and submit that they have settled the dispute qua the aforesaid FIR and they do not wish to pursue the case against petitioner Nos.l &2. CRL.M.C. 2391/2011 Page 1 of 2 Signing Date:21.08.2024 17:03:48 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 5. Respondent No.2 has annexed the photocopy of the identity card issued by the Election Commission of India bearing No.DL/06/064/111361 in the name of Mahesh Kumar s/o Shiv Prasad Saini and photocopy of the identity card of respondent No.3 Suman Lata Saini issued by the Election Commission of India bearing No.DL/06/064/111362 in the name of Suman Lata w/o Mahesh Kumar are on the record. 6. Since the matter has already been settled qua the aforesaid FIR No.94/2010 and the respondent Nos.2 & 2 do not wish to pursue the case further as they have settled all the disputes qua the said FIR. ^ 7. In the interestof justice,and keeping in view the settlement between the parties, I hereby quash the FIR No.94/2010 registered at police station Civil Lines, Delhi under Section 420/ 468/471/120B IPC against the petitioner Nos.l & 2. 8. The Government machinery has been used and the time of the Court has been consumed, therefore, I impose the costs of no,000/- each on petitioner Nos.l & 2 to be paid in favour of Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within a week from today. Proof of the same shall also be placed on the record. T' . 9. Criminal M.C. No.2391/2011 is allowed in above terms. 10. Dasti under signature of the Court Master. SURESH KAITJ July 28, 2011 Mk CRL.M.C. 2391/2011 Page 2 of 2