1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.10.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13862 of 2011 1.Gunasekaran 2.Chithra 3.Getheea 4.Gopal : Petitioners Vs. Mohanapriya : Respondent PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records relating to the complaint in M.C.No.12 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Sitharanjandas O R D E R Seeking to quash the proceedings in M.C.No.12 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, the petitioners, who are the respondents in the said case, have come up with this petition. The respondent is the petitioner before the lower Court. 2. The petitioner have filed the said case before the Sub Court, seeking certain protection orders, as provided under the Domestic Violence Act. Seeking to quash the same, they have come up with this petition. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, there every proceedings like maintenance proceedings and divorce proceedings elsewhere and therefore, this case is not maintainable. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. In my considered opinion, it is not as though the petitioners/respondents have no statutory right to file a petition to claim certain protection orders. Unless, it is stated that the Court has not got jurisdiction and this petition is against law, there is no scope to interfere with the proceedings of the lower Court. The petitioner has not made out a case or any ground to quash the proceedings. In such view of the matter, this petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi. Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13862 of 2011 20.10.2011 vsm NSV/9.11.11/2P/2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/