( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2426 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2426 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2426 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.554 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO.554 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO.554 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1398 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.1398 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.1398 OF 2004 Smt.Laxmi Gupta .. Appellant V/s M/s.V.H.B.Pharmaceuticals Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Ms.K.N.Samant for the Appellant. Mr.Neel Helekar for Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 7th December, 2007. DATE : 7th December, 2007. DATE : 7th December, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the partries. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay caused in filing the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)