// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.4051/2009 {Mohammed Umar Vs. The State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 12th August, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Sanjay Mathur, Counsel for petitioner Shri Anees Bhurat, PP for the State #### By the Court: Learned counsel for petitioner submits that truck, in dispute, had already been sold by the petitioner and he has wrongly been impleaded as an accused in the present case. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by the Sessions Judge, Dungarpur, in its order dated 30th June, 2009, wherein it is mentioned that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; the petitioner is a registered owner of the truck in dispute; a standing non-bailable warrant has also been issued against the petitioner. It is relevant to mention that the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 has been amended vide Notification dated 6th June, 2007. // 2 // After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow this application under Section 438, Cr.P.C., and the same is accordingly dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//