WP(C) 4785/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned standing counsel for the Education Department and Mr. G. Goswami, learn ed Counsel for the Sarba Siksha Abhikan Mission. The petitioner, who was appointed in the year 1987 as a teacher in Torani Kakodo nga M.E. School under Golaghat Block at pre-provincialised stage and was subsequ ently regularized against a sanctioned post by order dated 6.11.99 (Annexure-2) issued by the District Elementary Officer, Golaghat, is aggrieved by non-payment of her salaries right from the date when her service was regularized in the san ctioned post. This Court on 13.11.2010 granted time to the departmental counsel to obtain inst ructions in the matter. But, Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the Edu cation Department submits that no instruction is received by him till date. Howe ver, since the grievance of the petitioner is non-receipt of salary, Mr. Dutta s ubmits that her claim could be referred for necessary consideration by the Commi ttee constituted under orders of this Court recorded in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar vs. State of Assam & Ors) reported in 2006(2) GLT 216 . Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel submits that since requisite amount for payment of salaries of OBB category teachers have been released by the Central Govt, there is no reason for the State Govt. to withhold payment of wages of the regularize d teachers. Having regard to the above contentions and keeping in mind the decision of this Court in Sudhendu Mohan Talukdar(supra), I am inclined to direct that the petiti oner’s claim for salary be examined by the functioning Committee under Education Department constituted on the basis of this Court’s order in Sudhendu Mohan (su pra). To facilitate such consideration, the petitioner may file a representation addressed to the Director of Elementary Education, Assam along with a copy of t his Court’s order. The Director may thereafter ensure consideration of the petit ioner’s grievance by the Committee, within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of h er representation. The case is disposed of with the above order.