IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28555 of 2008 MD.NASEEM @ NASIM MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 31.7.2008 Heard. Petitioner’s name does not figure in the F.I.R. in a case under section 307 etc. of the Indian Penal Code. The rejection order indicates that witnesses from different paragraphs of the case diary have named the petitioner as one of the participants. The contention is that although the witnesses had seen the petitioner participating in the offence but absence of petitioner’s name in the F.I.R. gets significance. Regard being had to the contention, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur, in connection with Sadar (Vaishali) P.S. case no.388 of 2005, G.R. no.3195 of 2005. Sudip (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)