IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9254 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR YADAV & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 15.02.2011 By order dated 02.12.2010, an explanation was called for from the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Complaint Case No.1051-C of 2008as to why no cognizance under sections 376 and 511 Indian Penal Code was taken even though such ingredients were available in the complaint petition. The explanation of the concerned Officer has been perused by me with which I am not satisfied at all. The reason given is that no graphic descriptions have been given about how attempt to rape was made by the accused persons in the complainant’s solemn affirmation for taking cognizance under the said sections. The officer is suggested to be more careful in future. Let this order be communicated to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Complaint Case No.1051-C of 2008 through FAX at the cost of the State. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)