IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.877 of 2010 MANISH KUMAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 2.11.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. In the instant writ application the petitioners confines their prayer to the supply of visibile copy of police paper of Tariyani P.S. Case No.139 of 2006 instituted under section 302/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in course of investigation, the police submitted final report. However, on the basis of the police report, the learned Magistrate took cognizance of offence under sections 302/34 of the Penal Code and summoned the petitioners to face trial. The petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail. The petitioners further submits that the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Vs State (NCT of Delhi), reported in 2010(3) P.L.J.R. (SC) 1 has held that the accused has right to supply of police paper as provided under section 303 Cr.P.C. He submits that though the police paper has been supplied but the same is not legible. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be open for the petitioners to make such grievance before the court concerned itself. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) 2