IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18702 of 2010 1. MUNNA YADAV 2. UMA SHANKAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.6.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Sathi P.S.Case No.5 of 2010 for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148,149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 447 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioners, with reference to the statement as set out in the first information report placed at Annexure-1 of the bail application, submits that although specific references have been made as regarding other accused of assaulting the informant and his family members but no specific overt act has been assigned to either of the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that except the allegation that the petitioners were members of the unlawful assembly, no other allegation has been set out against them. He, with reference to the order dated 6.4.2010 passed in cr.Misc.No.6565 of 2010 (Annexure-3, submits that eight of the accused 2 persons against whom there was no specific allegation, were released on anticipatory bail by a bench of this court. Learned counsel submits that the case of the petitioners is on a better footing. Learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that one of injured has succumbed to the injuries and these petitioners do not deserve bail. Having heard rival submissions and in view of the nature of allegations, let petitioners (1) Munna Yadav and (2) Uma Shankar Yadav be released on bail on their individually furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Sathi P.S.Case No.5 of 2010. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)