SiNSlEBENCH c^^^_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITONfSl No. ^^/ 2010 PETITIONERS '^^ vf} »/^/^/ /v^-^y ^•/s.^^ '//" ~ --' ^' •^5 6. Vidhadhar Patel, S/o Shri Bhagatram Patel, aged about 30 years, Post Shiksha Karmi R/oVillage Rajadera, Post Bhitidih, P.S. Pithora, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Manoj Patel,S/o Shri Jaylal Patel, aged about 28 years, Post Shiksha Karmi R/o -:- ViNage Diverra, Post Bhitidih, P.S. and Tahsil Pithora, District" Mahasamund (C.G.) Parmesh'war Dadsena, S/6 Shri Meghnath Dadsena, ag'ed about 30 years; Post Shjksha Karmj R/o Bdndeii, P.S.' ahd Tahsil Pithora^ Digtrict MahasarrluHci (fc;i3.) Smt. Pramila Sinha;;W/o ' Sftri 'PUnitram Sinha^ aged;' about 3& years, PbsfJ' : Shiksha Karmi R/o;Village SaH<ada,'P.S. ariid 'faHsil Pithora, DiStrict Mahasarhund (C.G.) Smt. Ahgeshwari Sinha, W/o Vinod Sinha; aged about 28 years, Post ! • Shjksha Karmi R/o Village Sarkada, P.S. an&'Tahisil Pittiora, District '"-1''"3 ^'- u .' Mahasamund (C.G.) Sdmkatiti Yadav;\S^b Shri" P.L.Yadav, aged aboyt 38 y^ars,: Post Shiksh'a;Kan:ni R/oi'Vil1Sge Sargato'ra,' :Pbst Sonapali; Tahsil Pjthora, DEstirictr'Mahasamund (C.G.) Vishwahath Yadav, S/o Shri Ratiram Patel, aged;about 28 years, Post SMikSha Karmi R/b Village ^8. ^- Sargatora, Post Sonapali, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Ashok Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Nimonkar Sahu, aged about 29 years; Post Shiksha Karmi R/o Village Birjapali, Post Mongrapali, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Teklal Sahu, S/oKesram Sahu, aged about 30 years, Post Shiksha Karmi R/o Village Rikokali, Post Rikokali, Tahsil Pithora, Districf Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS ^ ^ 1. Stateof.ehhattisgarh Through: Secretary; "i •!11 Departhrtenf of Sci-iobl Education, D.K.S: Bhawan, Mantralya, Raipur (C.G.) District'Educatiori Ol'ficer, ' Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA That the petitioner most respectifully begs t& subm'rt 'as under:- PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned above in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned above in the cause title'. 3. PARTICULAR OF THE CAUSE/ ORDER AGAINST WHICH THEiPETITlONiISMADE: j%s:H)@l 'R'MMMNa§®lEsg^^^ :.,,ll~J:':':S'^^y';^T(:HiBri.:MN^ ..•^e^^^^g^-'^NsWiriIl^itiSffi^NI^ ^i=^itiSi^iiSi".s:^^.,.::'',^^.^ \/B^S® ftESPQNEIINTS StateQfGhhattisgarKanctotli^rS i l' :.,•;,.,.•i:::.®fnfe^;u^iy^:^yn:s6l^;tl^^|fitic^ •Sfflt Srffithia^SSRarPL^rrgspSnaeiitS/Stai^^ •^wnsifif'ETiTiie^ijMi^Ri^^ ^^^ffiimsTMIBWl^BNffil^S^-l:'^ •?7;;!-;i(S;R;ffi;E;R':.' .1"'. ,' ."^ "•;,,:^ ^ .: .n'.?' :• •• •:&^^t^^y^%':</^iy •::^|||||^r|^||^gB|B||^tifigg[8i1gn|g(ffi^ v^j'e||^|tUWBMSnl^BBUK8KIBilUIUSW:Se%^IWIi^^ ;SBiK§l?i|I^rtti|©f8^:l,:? ^y^1;l^bW^K^;'(a^^ appear'^Sttiie^p^eKHead lyaster^n th^ tKeeX^n^ci&^s^enyearisasShJksBaKarrH^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ *!'."• :;; '' :•' ^•-: ; : i-':i-^: •^ ^^•: : . : :: -: :. ."• ''!iu,.: :./: : • . . .^' •:-. .''•.. ^ l':'''\:..''^ 2. CouTlSel for 'trt®^ ^ gbveBifflfient^asilak^rafa^ who^av6|{^g5^ri^wg0fs^nyE®rseitt^riB ^^^ TeacB^ Or^Otttt^ p0^ efShikSfta Kar ^ ric^hirig in th^ [prgsent ^ TS.11^010r^uSd;bytneDireGtW totl1&^3v0c,ate Gen§i^t;©(^y.^We^clIgtt^n^ Ahuja alSG anff sh^ is^ petitioneire submitstbeft tRe exaffl^ schedaledfor( 28.11;201^and 29.11.20^^^ lappriel^nd ttiatiliiiey nl^^^^T^ l^ire^ieffii ifl^^|i^u|^;t^jthfe^t%^t^ ^l L- l/:'-::'>'^:l:sy:'.?f^ l]^pe£ir'1n;fl^isaicl;ex£l(VunatK)n^:::::',,';;.;,;^ i3. :Statg counset SHtWits that the^^Hiei^i|( %^li^ .iprem^yre;'aHa;^if;,[t^ey;:'Mav^,y:u|y:^fitleS:^ aythorjty^ont^rr^^^^ld^ct^uraB^K^ ,Stat6;;Ge^rttmen^:via^;lgH6r^aited^W^1:i2®1iOSi^^ -^ nnr III s l 1!.: •2-- l'? ^ 4. IA the facts antl eircumsteinces of the case, as nottiingsurvives in the petition, it is disposed ofwith a directidn tothecompeterrtau to permit the j:)ietitione t8 appear in the exatliination to^ te 28/11.2010 and 29.11.2010 forthepoSfofHeadMa^r^ursuantto^ deGiSiofftakeriBytfteStateGoVemmentsubjecttotRevgrifi faCt that the petjtionere Sav^fill^ in their form^ and thesam beenduiyaec^ptedbyfheai.jthorityconGemed. If th@ grievance of the petjtioners still §t.)rvives,they wQulcl be at t&apprbaGntnisCoyrt. - Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge