IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1108 of 2006 JAI PRAKASH CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7. 28.8.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 15.11.2006 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-1, Banka in Sessions Trial No. 221 of 1998/267 of 2006. It appears that opposite party nos. 2 and 3 were put on trial for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. and ultimately both of them have been acquitted. On perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that it is a peculiar case. The informant, who is the petitioner in this revision, himself is an accused for the commission of the same offence in a separate case. Trial is going on. He, in order to save his own skin after nine days of the occurrence filed a complaint which was investigated by the police and ultimately police submitted final form. Unfortunately CJM without application of mind took cognizance against the opposite parties. However, ultimately the court below has acquitted the opposite parties. I find no merit in this revision. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)