IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18282 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV @ PAPPU KUMAR YADAV son of Kamal Prasad Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 04.08.2010 Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner is being filed. Let it be kept with the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 376,511 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case according to the mother-in-law of the deceased is that on the fateful night suddenly she saw her daughter- in-law in a naked condition and burning who disclosed to her that the petitioner had attempted to rape her and on her refusal had thrown kerosene oil and lit a match stick. Subsequently, the petitioner was also found to have sustained 55% burn injuries and admitted in the hospital who stated that in fact the deceased, who had been abandoned by her husband and, he, had love affairs, and she had called him and was pressurizing him to marry her in course of which this occurrence took place. The fact that the petitioner also sustained 55% burn injuries is also indicative of this theory. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No.208 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit - 2 - giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)