IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7129 of 2009 Date of decision:16.03.2010 Virender Mehra ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Tajender K Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajvir Singh Sihag, Advocate, for respondents 2 and 3. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner challenges the letter dated 11.06.2008 issued by the respondents 2 and 3 under the terms of which the application of the petitioner for allotment of an industrial plot was rejected. It is contended that on account of several objections from persons, who had been aggrieved about non-allotment of plots, an Anomaly Committee had been constituted and it will examine the application of persons, who had been previously rejected. The petitioner shall have, therefore, a liberty to approach the Anomaly Committee and present his application for allotment within a period of 2 weeks from the date of the receipt of Civil Writ Petition No.7129 of 2009 - 2 - the copy of the order. The Anomaly Committee will take a decision in the manner set forth under the relevant rules. The petitioner will have an independent remedy to challenge any decision if he is in any way aggrieved by the decision taken by the Anomaly Committee. Reserving to the petitioner such liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 16.03.2010 sanjeev