1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4051/2010. LRs. of Chandanmal. vs. Shri Kishan Agarwal. Date : 7.5.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.MR Singhvi, for the petitioners. Mr.JR Patel, for the respondent. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved against the order of eviction dated 11.9.2007 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jodhpur and dismissal of their appeal by order dated 6.2.2010. After going through the reasons given by the Tribunals below in the impugned orders, this Court is of the view that both the Tribunals have considered the facts in detail and there is no scope for interference in the findings of facts recorded in the impugned orders as there arises no jurisdictional error nor there arises any question of law much less substantial question of law. Consequently, this writ petition deserves to be dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the 2 petitioners prayed that two years' time may be granted to the petitioners to vacate the premises in question. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that at the most, time may be granted upto 31.12.2010. I considered this prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners. Looking to the facts of the case, this Court is of the view that the petitioners be granted time upto 31.5.2011 to vacate the premises in question. Therefore, it is ordered that in case, the petitioners furnish a written undertaking before the Rent Tribunal within a period of one month from today that they shall hand over the vacant possession to the respondent/landlord by or before 31.5.2011 and shall not part with the possession or sublet the premises in question during this period and shall pay all the arrears of rent and decreetal amount, if due, within a period of two months from today and shall also deposit the mesne profits @ Rs.1,000/- per month, month by month by 15th day of each succeeding month of their tenancy, in the bank account of the respondent/landlord, particulars of which be supplied to the petitioners, the decree under challenge shall not be executed till 1.6.2011. In case of non-compliance of this order or 3 default in payment of rent mentioned above, the respondent will be free to execute the order forthwith without obtaining any order from this Court. With the aforesaid concession, this writ petition is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya