CP.361-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION No. 361 OF 2010 Manganga Shikshan Sanstha, Bhimai Ambedkar Adhyapak Vidyalay, Satara ...Petitioner Vs. National Council for Teachers Education Western Regional Committee & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmukh, for the Petitioner. Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : FEBRUARY 25, 2011 P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the directions given by this Court in paragraph 7 of the order passed in Writ Petition No. 5834 of 2009, dated 6th November 2009 hav not been complied with by respondent No.1. By the said order, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were directed to consider the matter do novo and also to consider the recommendation of the State Government, if any. 2. Mr. Warunjikar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of CP.361-10 - 2 - respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that by a letter dated 26th November, 2010 the respondents have asked the State Government to clarify whether the recommendations have been given by the State Government or not. Similarly, by 9th November, 2010 a show-cause notice has been issued to the petitioner herein to explain the deficiencies which were noticed after inspection was taken. Since the process of considering the matter de novo has already begun, in my view, it would be appropriate if the respondents are directed to decide the matter and take a decision within 8 weeks from today. With these directions, contempt petition is disposed of. [ V. M. KANADE J.]