HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITIOIN No.4326 of 2009 Date: February 07, 2011 Between: Gandham Indira … Petitioner And 1. The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITIOIN No.4326 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner/A-1 is accused of offences punishable under Sections 182, 406, 419, 420, 435, 447, 468 and 120-B IPC in C.C. No.9 of 2009 on the file of V Metropolitan Magistrate, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District, along with others. 2. For the purpose of this petition it can be noted that the only allegations made against the petitioner/A-1 are that she is daughter of A-2 who was entrusted with property affairs of the second respondent/de facto complainant and that ultimately a registered document came into existence in favour of A-1 styling the same to have been executed by the second respondent and that on verification from the Sub-Registrar’s office the de facto complainant found that his signature was forged in the sale deed in favour of A-1 and that by impersonating another as the de facto complainant, the sale deed came to be registered in favour of A-1. 3. If those allegations are taken on their face value, certainly offences under Sections 419, 420, 468 and 120-B IPC are applicable as against the petitioner/A-1. Truth or otherwise of the said allegations is a question of fact which this Court cannot go into and decide at the threshold and it is a matter to be decided by the trial court after recording of evidence of both the parties. I do not find any valid and legal grounds to quash the proceedings in so far as the petitioner/A-1 is concerned. 4. In the result, the criminal petition is dismissed. ___________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J Date: February 07, 2011. BSB