IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.185 OF 2009 Hanmant Vitthal Kapase & Ors. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.V.V.Purwant for the applicants. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 13th March 2009. : 13th March 2009. : 13th March 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned advocate for the applicants. The applicants have been convicted for the offences punishable under section 307 read with section 149, section 148 read with section 149, 143, 147, 324 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum substantive sentence is four years rigorous imprisonment. 2. The impugned order shows that the applicants were granted bail during the pendency of the trial. The applicants were in custody from 17th August 2005 to 06th September 2005. 3. The sentence is of limited duration i.e four (2) years. The applicants were on bail throughout the trial. There is no allegation of misuse of the liberty granted. No antecedents of the applicant have been brought on record. In the judgment, the learned trial Judge has observed that the incident occured as the complainant himself had assaulted the accused No.1. There are no extra-ordinary circumstances on record to deny the relief of the bail to the applicant especially when they were on bail during the pendency of the trial and the substantive sentence is of four years. The appeal is not likely to be heard finally before the remaining period of sentence is over. 4. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) The applicants shall be enlarged on the same bail on which they were enlarged during the pendency of trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within period of four weeks from today. (ii) Bail is granted subject to further condition that the applicants will report to Phaltan police station once in every calendar month till the disposal of the appeal. (3) (A.S.Oka,J)