(5) il75/o£; BEFORE 'aE M.P.STATE AaiINISTRATIVE TRIBUHAL AT JABAUVR '>!-• O.A.NO 1995 Bhuneshwar Yadsv s/6 Shri Jagatrasa aged 32 ysars, 0/0 Executive Engineer. water Resoarces Depaaaent ,Kawar<3ha Oivisio"B,Kawardha,3istt-Rajnandgaon, B/a S ilhadi post-Podi Tah-Kawarciha, Oist't-Raj nandgaoa • V e rs us 1.3 tate o£M.P.ttarough the secretary,Water Resources Qepartment, • Vallabtt Bhawan, 2.cialef Engi(ieer,Mahanadi %>adwari Kachhar Water Resources O^iartment, Raipur. 3.3 uperinteading Engineer, 1 WateS- Resources Depart(nent,Sbj(^nath Mandal»0urg. 4.Executive Eagineer,Water assources Bepartnnenfc,Ka'warclha Dj.vi sion,Kawardha, Oi stt-Raj aandgao a. •Appltcant -l^esponideRts .APPItIGiiTIOli HNOES SSCTION 19 OF •'IHS AO'IINISTKATIVE TBI3UNAL ACT . 198 5 OBTAIIfi OF THE APPX.raTIONs 1 .Part lculars of the aopll.cants As abowe. 2^.Particulars of the respoadents; 3.1'articalars of the order agaiRSt whicfa appllcation is aaades i)Against the order dt. 4.8.1995 As above rZ. :;i;.! i-a V! ...,J....>;.-.. lll'iilti'"t!S5S 3I!^(flil l^-ti* Wff SB^n »«li<» <nwtF<(»*ti«» 'y^r •<<i<<icf<<, 8>Ttlw'is, R«'it'«i,< ^...^.ers}....U25/&c.. 3(I^!(|<>('3tcb;(;>jq{yi^4y ¥«RW^(^T <»(t^iR 'i?I'4i<'f'4il'i *n*rcfi "*f ^'<i- ^-^K ^srRptiBi^ Shri Amit Verma counsel ffir the peSitioner. Shri Pravin Das GA for th^ respondents/State. Case of the petitioner is t(iat he was appointed as labour on 6.4.1989 and continued on the ^aid post till issuance of termination order dated 4.8.1995 and ther^after the other termination order dated 31.1.2000. ( Counsel for the petitionei} submits that the first termination order dated 4.8.1995 was stayec? by this Court on 5.9.1995 and on the strength of the said stay orijier the petitioner continued on the said post til! passing «f the j second termination order dated 31.1.2000 which was also stayecf later on by order dated 16.2.2000. Counsel for the petitioner furttjier submits that on 5.3.2008 the Government has issued a circul^r and taken a decision to consider the cases of the persons who we|-e appointed prior to year 1998 and also ofthose who areworking foif last 10 years. In vlew ofthe subsequent[developments and issuance ofthe circular dated 5.3.2008, at thi^ stage counsel^for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representati^n to fhe concerned respondenfs seeking reguiarization of service.l He also prays for a direction to the concerned respondents to consifjier the case of the petitioner in the WH!CR[li.*TSa°II<"<M-J-Wli'<—FS/95—11/2008—1.00,000. Si'-S'^S^SS^SS S^S®BSii B^SSg® fWfiC—7S ,,v^. .:.- . sn^r qii Ri-ii+ 311^1 gTRTO .Wff ..-^^. osT WW aWKtt 3^ '<11<11C1<1, ®Tll.<1'l<o, fslCliyy ^...w..ft...U^U.2.SU: — -2-- W[,200 31I^?['T?qT C^f3??ll) TOIIW TStfef 3Ilt?I iht of the iegai position and Government. He submits that 4 deciding She representation pf| counsei for ths petitioner, count objection. Accordingly, the petitiot|i iiberty as aforesaid. Sf the petit) concerned respondents wlthin 4 copy of.this order, the decide the same within a furtll' date of its receipt strictly in accs} This Court has not case and the authorities cd representation of the petifioner | into considerafion the cireulart regularization of government conc^rned ^(<iil<f<ftn 'W^tf ^f ft^ <I^i-^R ^sjfgiTsii^l |the various circulars issued by the ome time iimit may also be fixed for ifhe petitioner. To this prayer of the sei for the respondents/State has no is dismissed as withdrawn with loner makes a representation to the ^ne month from fhe date of receipt of respondents are expected to ler period of three months from the Irdance with law. >sed any opinion on the merits of the Incerned are free to decide the strictly in accordance with law taking 3 and the guidelines in respect of en|iployees. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge i;si-t;^'.3.^S3PB8^» ^^si^.^gSi^S^t