IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2010 / 29TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 26855 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.P.SIVASANKARAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN (LATE) KELEPPATT PARAMBIL, PURATHUR (P.O) B.P.ANGADI, MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY SRI.PARVATHI MENON SRI.BIJU MEENATOOR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS (HR&CE), (Admn.) DEPARTMENT, CALICUT PIN – 673573 2. SREE KADAMPUZHA BHAGAVATHI DEVASWOM TRUSTEE BOARD, KADAMPUZHA, MALAPPURAM POST, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-676505 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE KADAMPUZHA BHAGAVATHI DEVASWOM, KADAMPUZHA POST, MALAPPURAM DIST. PIN- 676505 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, PIN-676505 SC MR.MOHANAKANNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No.26855 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of August 2010 J U D G M E N T Pursuant to the directions in Ext.P3 judgment, Ext.P2 representation submitted by the petitioner was considered in the light of Ext.P1 judgment of the Division Bench. However, by Ext.P4 order, his claim for continuance in service was rejected. Aggrieved by Ext.P4, petitioner submitted Ext.P5 representation before the 4th respondent and seeks a direction for its consideration. 2. However, as rightly pointed out by the learned Standing counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 4, if the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4, remedy available to the petitioner is to file a revision under Section 18 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act before the 1st W.P.(C) No.26855 of 2010 -: 2 :- respondent. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy available against Ext.P4. 3. It is directed that if a revision against Ext.P4 is filed within three weeks from today, the same will be entertained by the 1st respondent and orders on the revision will be passed, at any rate, within 8 weeks thereafter. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment also before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Jvt