-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7911 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 7911 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 7911 OF 2003 Mukhtarahmed Mahamad Shaikh & others. .. .. .. .. Petitioners. Versus The Sangli Bank Limited........ .... Respondent. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for the Respondent. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2005. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2005. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: On the admitted position that the petitioners had not filed any say before the executing court, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. However, learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will make fresh application for settlement of the dues of the respondent. The petitioners are at liberty to make such an application to the respondent and the respondent shall consider the same according to their norms. 2. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- -: 2 :- S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J. S. A. BOBDE, J.