1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.22/2010. (Shaikh Yasin s/o Tar Mohd. Vs. Maharashtra Board of Wakf and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 4 th February, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.Kazi for the petitioner. 2) Rejection of the application by learned Presiding Officer of the Wakf Tribunal by order dated 7th January, 2010 in terms of Order 14, Rule 2 of CPC, not inclined to frame preliminary issue on the point of limitation, is assailed by the appellant. 3) For the purpose orders to be passed, notice need not be issued to the respondents. 4) It is clear, the learned Presiding Officer shall be considering all the issues while dealing with the petition as he has indicated in the very order 2 under challenge. 5) No interference, therefore, is warranted in the order. CRA lacks merit, it is dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/cra22.10