1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 106 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 16.09.2010 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. This Appeal from Order takes exception to the order dated 01.07.2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded, below Exh. 8, in Special Civil Suit No. 77 of 2008. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that status-quo order may be passed, so that respondents/original plaintiffs will not be able to create third party right during pendency of the suit. 2. Counsel appearing for the respondents vehemently opposed to this prayer and also invited my attention to the reasons in the impugned judgment, more particularly para 14 of the judgment and submitted that the Appeal 2 from Order is devoid of merit and same may be dismissed. 3. Perused the judgment and order. While granting relief in favour of the plaintiff, the Court has scrutinized the material brought on record. The Court has also perused the terms of the agreement and granted relief in favour of the plaintiff. On careful perusal of the judgment order, I do not see any perversity or case for interference since equitable order has been passed by the Court below. Hence, no interference is called for. The Appeal from Order is dismissed. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2010/SEP10/ao106.09