IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4379 of 2009 Upendra Kumar Singh . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 02. 19.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The claim in the writ petition is for regularization in pursuance of the original appointment on daily wages in the year 1988. The engagement of the petitioner was terminated in 1997. C.W.J.C. No. 4410 of 1988 filed earlier for regularization was dismissed on 15.09.1999. L.P.A. No. 1241 of 1999 against the same was also dismissed on 29.02.2000. A repeat writ application, C.W.J.C. No. 3572 of 2004 was dismissed on 22.07.2004. Thereafter the petitioner filed C.W.J.C. No. 11852 of 2006 which resulted in a reference to the three men committee which rejected his claim on 27.05.2008. C.W.J.C. No. 11852 of 2006 was disposed en bloc with a large number of analogous cases without consideration of the facts of an individual case. Regularization is not a mode of appointment. If he was out of employment since 1997 the claim of regularization does not arise. Res judicata completely bars him from raising the issue any further after first writ application and the L.P.A. came to be dismissed and the matter attained finality. The application is dismissed. Devendra/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)