IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.809 of 2008 1. Dr. Kamla Prasad, son of Late Deo Nandan Singh, Resident of Village-Bari Salahpur, P.O.-Dumari, Via-Harayanpur, P.S.-Adalhatt, District-Mirzapur (U.P.) presently posted as Lecturer in the Department of Geography, Shershah College, Sasaram. 2. Dr. Hari Krishna Singh, son of Sri Ram Barari Singh, Resident of Village- Ahirauli, P.O.-Bedaka deeh, Police Station-Shio Sagar, District-Rohtas, presently posted as Lecturer in the Department of History, Shershah College, Sasaram. 3. Vijay Shankar Singh, son of Shio Kumar Singh, Resident of Village & P.O.-Muri, P.S.-Chinpur, District-Kaimur at Bhabua, presently posted as Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy, Shershah College, Sasaram. 4. Dr. Bhim Shankar Rai, son of Late Sudama Rai, resident of Village-Riwan, P.O.-Akhitarpur, P.S.-Karahgar, District-Rohtas, presently posted as Lecturer in the department of History, Shershah College, Sasaram. 5. Dr. Ram Awadhesh Singh, son of Late Sukh Nandan Singh, Resident of Village & P.O.-Akhityarpur, Police Station Karahgar, District-Rohtas, presently posted as Lecturer in the Department of Hindi, Shershah College, Sasaram. .................................. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Higher Education Department, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Dr. Ram Pal Singh, the Vice Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah. 3. Sri B.N. Pandey, the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 4. Sri P.A. Khan, the Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah. 5. Sri Bharat Prasad, the Finance Officer, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah. 6. Sri Dharmraj Singh, the Principal, Shershah College, Sasaram, Rohtas. ................................ Opposite Parties/Respondents ----------- 5 30/3/2010 Heard the parties. Strictly speaking there was no such direction in the order of this Court dated 19.6.2006 in C.W.J.C. No. 981 of 2005 which was capable of being violated as alleged in this contempt application. This Court is therefore not inclined to entertain this application, but then at the same time it is hereby once again observed as was done on the earlier occasion in the aforesaid order that if any representation has been filed by the petitioner the same 2 would be required to be considered and disposed of on its own merits in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)