Crl. Misc. No. M-7172 of 2011 (O&M) {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-7172 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.05.2011 Ravinder Kaur ......Petitioner versus State Of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Guninder S. Brar, AAG, Punjab Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. D.S. Malwai, Advocate for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) The petitioner has sought directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 for taking legal action against respondent Nos. 5 and 6 by registering case against them and further tracing the whereabouts of the husband of the petitioner and to arrest the accused respondent Nos. 5 and 6. The main grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos. 5 and 6 have forcibly and illegally instigated Parminder Singh (husband of the petitioner)to sell his 20 kanals land to Vikramjit Singh Crl. Misc. No. M-7172 of 2011 (O&M) {2} for a sum of Rs.18,40,000/-. The husband of the petitioner also purchased stamp of Rs.92,000/- from State Bank of India. Copy of receipt dated 29.11.2010 issued by State Bank of India is attached as Annexure P-1. It has further been alleged that the sale deed was registered in favour of Vikramjit Singh on 29.11.2010 and the said amount of Rs.18,40,000/- was also taken forcibly by accused- respondent Nos. 5 and 6. It has further been alleged that the husband of the petitioner is missing since then and has not returned back home. The petitioner apprehends that her husband have been murdered or eliminated by the accused persons in order to grab the money from him. On notice,a reply has been filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police along with statement of Parminder Singh (Annexures R-1/T and R-2/T). As per statement dated 21.12.2010, Parminder Singh has stated that he has sold his land measuring 2½ killas situated in village Puhla District Bhatinda out of his own accord, mentally alert and without any pressure.He has further stated that his brothers and sisters have no concern with the land. As per statement dated 14.05.2011, Parminder Singh is alive and is staying abroad and his relatives have been falsely implicated for killing him and the allegations levelled against them are totally false. He has further stated that he has not given any money to them nor there is any money transaction with Crl. Misc. No. M-7172 of 2011 (O&M) {3} them. He has further stated that his sisters and brothers and other relatives are quite innocent. The theka/share of half killa/acre of land of Jagmeet Kaur is being received by Ravinder Kaur w/o Parminder Singh for the last 14 years and intends to occupy the same. He has further stated in his affidavit that Gurjinder Singh, kiran Kaur, Ravinder Kaur, Sandeep Singh, Balvir Singh, Gurmel Kaur in connivance with each other, got relayed a false news about him that he has gone mad. He had given his statement against them in Chardi Kala Time T.V Channel, but in vain. As per reply of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Giddarbaha, he has stated that respondent Nos. 5 and 6 have supplied the affidavits dated 21.12.2010 and 14.05.2011 duly attested by Notary Public. He has further submitted that in application dated 22.02.2011 Annexure P2 was received in the office of Senior Superintendent of police, Muktsar i.e respondent No. 3, who marked the same to Deputy Superintendent of police, Giddarbaha and he had returned the same to Respondent no. 3 who has sent the same to Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda for necessary action on 08.03.2011 as the matte4r relates to District Bathinda. In view of the reply filed by the State and the affidavits of Parminder Singh, the allegations levelled against respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are found to be false and frivolous. Crl. Misc. No. M-7172 of 2011 (O&M) {4} Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.5000/-, which shall be deposited with the State Legal Service Authority, Chandigarh. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE May 25, 2011 G.Arora