Civil Revision No.1471 of 2011(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.1471 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : March 03, 2011 Hardev Singh ... Petitioner VERSUS Mohinder Kaur and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J.- This petition assails the order dated 19.1.2011 passed by Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.), Mansa refusing the plaintiff – petitioner (herein referred as `the petitioner') to recall the witnesses for examination-in-chief in order to prove the Will. Earlier the evidence of the petitioner was closed by order. The said order was challenged in this Court vide Civil Revision No.2932 of 2009 and this Court vide order dated 21.5.2009 allowed one last opportunity to lead his evidence, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. Thereafter, the petitioner tendered the costs before the Trial Court and the case was adjourned for 22.12.2009 for his evidence. On that day, he tendered the affidavits of two witnesses, namely; Kuldeep Singh (PW2) and Darbara Civil Revision No.1471 of 2011(O&M) [ 2 ] Singh (PW3) and tendered them for cross-examination. Thereafter, he moved an application dated 19.1.2011 for summoning some revenue officials along with the Will, stating that the original Will was lying in the revenue record, which was dismissed. Heard. The facts and circumstances, as referred to above, reveal that the petitioner is gaining the time obviously for the reasons, best known to him. He, after having examined the witnesses tendered the affidavits of the witnesses had tendered them for cross-examination. Now, he wants to recall and re-summon them to prove the Will. All these facts were within his knowledge at the earlier stage as well, but he wasted two years to examine two witnesses only. He was granted one opportunity to complete his evidence and that too, subject to payment of costs. Thus, it appears that the application has been designed to delay the trial. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. March 03, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE