IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 3982 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 19, 2010. Dhanna Singh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and others. ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavna, D.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of remissions to the petitioner. Reply on behalf of respondent-State has been filed. I have learned counsel for the State and have gone through the whole record. As per reply filed on behalf of respondent-State, petitioner has not fulfilled all the conditions mentioned in the judgment in Sukhwinder Singh @Titoo v. State of Punjab in Criminal Writ Petition No.1157 of 2006 decided on 10.08.2007, on the basis of which he requests for his release on CRM No.M-3982 of 2010 temporary bail pending decision of SLP in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It is further stated that case of petitioner was sent to learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala for considering the release of petitioner on temporary bail in view of Sukhwinder Singh’s case (supra) and however, the petitioner did not deposit the fine and hence, he could not be released. Hence, in view of these facts, no order is required to be passed in this petition. Disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 19, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2