33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 95/2008 o/o PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Through: versus SHASHI RUSTAGI & ORS. Through: CORAM: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Katyal, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Ravi Gupta, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER 23.07.2009 C.M.9983/09· By this application, jointly filed by the parties under Order 23 Rule 3, they wish their compromise to be recorded. In terms of the compromise, the possession of the premises has been delivered by the petitioner to the respondent and in consideration of the same being delivered, the respondent has agreed to forego the damages the petitioner in terms of the order dated 26.11.2008 of this Court. The terms of the compromise appear to be fair, just and reasonable. The application is supported by the affidavit of Mr.Anil Kumar Mittal, Manager, Punjab National Bank, Chandni Chowk, Delhi, who is present in Court and is identified by counsel for the petitioner. The affidavit of Smt. Shashi Rustagi, w/o late Shri Pradeep Kumar Rustagi, respondent no.l has also been filed in support of the application. Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:25.07.2024 16:19 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified In view of the aforesaid, the compromise contained in the memorandum of understanding as also the terms and conditions of the application is recorded. The parties shall remain bound by the same. The application stands disposed of. R.C.R.95/2008 & C.M.5577/09 In view of the compromise settlement arrived at between the parties, the petition also stands disposed of. JULY 23, 2009 as VIPIN SANGHI, J.