IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCAL AT NAINIAL WRIT PETITION NO.47 (MS) OF 2004 1. Raj Kumar, S/o Shri Bishambhar Singh, R/o Village-Bhagatpur, Post-Brahampur, District-Haridwar. 2. Smt. Rajesh Kumari, W/o Shri Dhir Singh, R/o Village-Alawalpur, Post-Bhikampur, District-Haridwar. ………………Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary Secondary Education, Dehradun, District-Dehradun. 2. Principal, District Education and Training Institute Roorkee, District-Haridwar. …………..Respondents. Dated: 19.06.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners and Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner for special B.T.C. training. 3. At the time of admission of the writ petition on 28.01.2004, following interim order was passed:- “heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel. The learned C.S.C. has accepted notices on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The respondents may file counter affidavit within four weeks. List thereafter. In the meantime, the respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner provisionally for special B.T.C. training.” 4. Thereafter on 15.02.2005 following order was passed:- “Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are permitted to implead Uttaranchal Shiksha Parishad Ram Nagar, Nainital as respondent during the course of the day. By order-dated 28.01.2004, this court directed respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners for special BTC. In pursuance to that order petitioners were permitted to undergo the training and now, they have completed the training and now, they have completed the training of Special BTC. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that result of the Special BTC Training Examination has been declared on 25.01.2005 but the result of the petitioner has not been declared. Since the petitioner has already completed the training, respondents are directed to declare the result of the petitioners, provisionally, provided petitioners have completed their training successfully and if they are selected for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition. Application disposed of accordingly. List the matter in the first week of March, 2005 along with Writ Petition No. 708 (SB) of 2002. 5. As will appear from the aforesaid two orders passed in the present writ petition, the petitioner was allowed to complete to special B.T.C. training and the result has been declared on 25.01.2005 and thereafter, the result of the petitioner was also declared and he was allowed to complete the training provisionally and at present he is working as Assistant Teacher in Primary School. 6. Briefly stated, according to the case of the petitioners, they have passed B.Ed. Examination from Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak and Kurukshetra University (Haryana) and both are permanent resident of Uttaranchal State. 7. Petitioner no. 2 has submitted that he is not pressing the writ petition, hence this writ petition is confined to the relief in respect of Raj Kumar/petitioner no.1. 8. In pursuance of the advertisement No.8/2001, the eligibility criteria is to be following effect:- ^^vfuok;Z ;ksX;rk,a& 1- 'kSf{kd & fof/k ekU;rk izkIr fo’ofo|ky; ls LukrdA 2- Ikzf’k{k.k%& bl gsrq mRrjkapy@mRrj izns’k dh ekU;rk izkIr laLFkk }kjk laLFkkxr ijh{kkFkhZ;ksa ds :i esa ch0,M0@,y0Vh0 vFkok i=kpkj ds ek/;e ls ch0,M0 gsrq ekU;rk izkIr fo’ofo|ky; ls ch0,M0 mRrh.kZ fd;k x;k gksA ftUgksaus laLd`r fo’ofo|ky; ls f’k{kk 'kL=h dh mikf/k yh gks ,oa f’k{kk 'kkL=h dh ijh{kk laLFkkxr ijh{kkFkhZ ds :Ik esa mRrh.kZ dh gks os Hkh vgZ gksaxsA mRrjizns’k ljdkj }kjk ekU;rk izkIr ,slh laLFkkvksa tks jk"Vªh; v/;kid izf’k{k.k ifj"kn }kjk ekU;rk izkIr gks] ls 'kkjhfjd f’k{kk izf’k{k.k ;Fkk ch0ih0,M] Mh0ih0,M0] lh0ih0,M0 vH;kFkhZ Hkh vgZ le>s tk,axsA blds laca/k esa mRrj izns’k 'kklu }kjk ekU; dh xbZ vof/k ¼o"kZ 1997½ rd ds ekU; dh xbZ laLFkkvksa ls mRRkh.kZ laLFkkxr vH;kfFkZ;ksa dks gh vgZ le>k tk,xk A** 9. According to the petitioner no.1 he has submitted his from in pursuance of the aforesaid notification for Special B.T.C. as 150 posts were lying vacant in District Haridwar. 10. A counter affidavit has been filed by the State, where he has justified the said advertisement on the basis of the two government orders namely 18th August, 2001 and 05.10.2001. 11. In the G.O. dated 18th August, 2001, it has specifically been mentioned that it is based on the G.O. dated 21st April, 2001. the same is quoted below:- “fo"k;%& mRrjkapy jkT; esa fLFkr f’k{kk ifj"kn }kjk lapkfyr izkFkfed fo|ky; esa lgk;d v/;kidksa dh O;oLFkk fof’k"V Ckh0Vh0lh0 ds ek/;ke ls fd;s tkus ds lEcU/k esa A egksn;] izns’k ds xzkeh.k {ks=ksa ds izkFkkfed fo|ky; esa lgk;d v/;kidksa dh deh dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izf’kf{kr Lukrd ;ksX;rk/kkjdks ch0,M0 ,y0Vh0 rFkk lh0ih0,M0@ch0ih0,M0 ;ksX;rk j[kus okys vH;kfFkZ;ksa dks lgk;d v/;kid ds :i esa rSukrh fd;s tkus ls iwoZ fof’k"V ch0Vh0lh0 dzk;Zdzeksa ds vUrxZr 06 ekg dk izf’k{k.k fn;s tkus gsrq 'kklukns’k la[;k 134@ek0la0fo0@2001 fnukad 21&4&2001 dk lUnHkZ xzg.k djus dk d"V djsaA 2& mijksDr ds vuqdze esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funs’k gqvk gS fd mijksDr lanfHkZr 'kklukns’k esa fof’k"V ch0Vh0lh0 izf’k{k.k gsrq lgk;d v/;kikdksa dks fjDr 2000 inksa ds lis{k p;u] izf’kf{k.k ds o"kkZuqdze esa fd;k tk;sxk vFkkZr~ p;u izf’k{k.k o"kZ ds dze esa fd;k tk;sxk ,oa iwoZ o"kZ ds izf’kf{kr vH;kfFkZ;ksa dks ojh;rk nh tk;sxhA fdlh ,d o"kZ dh ojh;rk lwph ml o"kZ ds izf’k{k.k izkIr vH;kfFkZ;ksa }kjk izkIr xq.kkadks ds EkSfjV ds vuqlkj rS;kj dh tk;sxhA 3& fof’k"V ch0Vh0lh0 ls lEcfU/kr mDr lanfHkZr 'kklukns’k fnukad 21&4&2001 ds izLrj&6 esa vfuok;Z izf’k{k.k vgZrk ds lEcU/k esa ;g mYys[k fd; x;k Fkk fd vH;fFkZ }kjk Lukrd ;ksX;rk rFkk ch0,M0@ ,y0Vh0 @lh0ih0,M0@Mh0ih0,M0 @ch0ih,M0 dk izf’k{k.k jkT; esa lapkfyr ekU;rk izkIr fo’ofo|ky;ksa RkFkk jkT; ljkdj }kjk lapkfyr egkfo|ky;ksa@izf’k{k.k egkfo|ky;ksa esa laLFkkxr Nk= ds :i esa mRrh.kZ fd;k x;k gSA bl lEcU/k esa ;g fu.kZ; fy;k x; fd gS%& ¼d½ ch0ih0@,y0Vh0 izf’k{k.k mRrjkapy vFkok mRrj izns’k dh ekU;rk izkIr laLFkk }kjk laLFkkxr izfr{k.kkFkhZ ds :i esa mRrh.kZ fd;k x;k gSA ¼[k½ mRrjkapy esa dksbZ izf’k{k.k laLFkk ugha gS vRk% mRrj izns’k ljdkj }kjk ekU;rk izkIr ,slh laLFkkvksa] tks jk"Vªh; v/;kid f’k{kk ifj"kn ls ekU;rk izkIr gksa] ls 'kfjfjd f’k{kk izf’k{k.k ;Fkk lh0ih0,M0] ch0ih0,M0 ,oa Mh0ih0,M0 izkIr vH;kfFkZ gh vkosnu djus gsrq vgZ le>s tk;saxsA ¼x½ mRrjkapy ewy ds vH;kfFkZ gh vkosnu dj ldrs gSaA vH;kFkhz ftl tuin dk ewy fuoklh gS dsoy mlh tuin ds fy, mldk vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tk;sxkA ;fn fdlh vH;kfFkZ }kjk vius x`g tuin ds vfrfjDr fdlh vU; tuin ds fy, Hkh vkosnd fd;k tkrk gS rks mlds }kjk izLrqr lHkh i= fujLr dj fn;s tk;saxsA ¼?k½ ewy fuoklh izek.ki= le{k izf/kdkjh ¼ftyk eftLVªsV vFkok jkTLo eftLVªsV½ }kjk iznr gh ekU; gksxk ftldh lR;kfir izfrfyfi vkosnu i= ds lkFk layXu djuk vfuok;Z gSA 4& bl ifjis{; esa lE;d~ fooknksijkUr ;g Hkh fu.kZ fy;k x;k fd fof’k"V ch0Vh0lh0 ds fjDr inksa ds lkis{k tuinokj fuEuor~ vkcaVu fufj/kkZfjr fd;k tk;%& dz-l- Tkuin dk uke fof'k"V ch0Vh0lh0 p;u gsrq fu/kkZfjr in 1 ikSM+h 250 2 peksyh 200 3 :nziz;kx 100 4 mRrjdk’kh 50 5 fVgjh 150 6 nsgjknwu 80 7 gfj}kj 100 8 uSuhrky 100 9 M/keflag uxj 270 10 vYeksM+k 250 11 Ckxs’oj 230 12 fiFkkSjkx<+ 100 13 pEikor 120 ;ksx 2000 5& bl lEcU/k esa iwoZ esa fuxZr 'kklukns’k dks bl lhek rd la’kksf/kr le>k tk;A vr% vuqjks/k gS fd mijksDrkuqlkj vxzsrj dk;Zokgh lqfuf’pr djrs gq, miyC/k djk;s x;s vkosnd i= ds izk:i ,oa foKkiu ds vk/kkj ij p;u dh izfdz;k vfoyEc izkjEHk djrs gq, d`r dk;Zokgh ,oa izdj.k dh izxfr ls 'kklu dks voxr djkus dk d"V djsaA** 12. G.O. dated 21.04.2001 was further explained on the basis of which the Government Order dated 18th August, 2001 was further modified in continuation of the G.O,. dated 21st April, 2001 and it has been clarified that all those candidates, who have completed the B.Ed. course form any recognized education institution on the basis of Patrachar (correspondence ) course or general B.Ed, with the candidate has obtained from any recognized university. 13. It has been held by the Allahabad High Court in Ramesh Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others 1993(2) ALR 88 that B.T.C. correspondence course should be treated s equivalent to B.T.C. regular course. 14. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the aforesaid judgment subject to the verification and recognition from the concerned university. 15. With petition is allowed. No order as to costs. 19.06.2006 (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Rathour