IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1641 of 2009 1. Sanjay Mahto son of Bhonu Mahto 2. Kishori Mahto son of late Ram Das Mahto 3. Naresh Mahto 4. Birendra Mahto Sons of Bhonu Mahto All resident of village- Saidpur, P.S.- Barh, District Patna. … petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar … Opposite Party ----------- 2. 21.11.2011 The accused- petitioners have preferred this revision application against the order dated 7.9.2009 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Barh in Sessions Trial No. 592 of 2009 by which the petition under Section 228 (1)(a) Cr.P.C. filed by them has been rejected. The main contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no case under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out and offence under Sections 323, 324, 341/34 I.P.C. is triable by the learned Magistrate. Learned counsel for the State submits that it appears that the informant has got grievous injury on the head which was dangerous and fatal to his life and definitely an offence under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for 2 both the parties and on perusal of the impugned order it appears that learned Additional Sessions Judge has considered the evidence on record and has found that there is sufficient material to make out a case for the offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances, stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)