(1) CRI.APP. 2809.2009+1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2809 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 215 OF 2009 Sudhakar S/o Nivrutti Kadam .. Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Mr. Manoj Shelke, Advocate h/f. Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate or the Applicant Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for the respondent-State ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. Though served the respondent no.2 (accused) is absent. The delay caused in filing of the Application is of 52 days. The applicant submits that he could not file the Revision Petition due to lack of knowledge and poor financial condition. He submits that he could not get monthly salary during the relevant period and was suffering from physical ailments which prevented him to take steps for filing of the Revision Petition. (2) CRI.APP. 2809.2009+1 3. Considering the un-controverted explanation given in the Application, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed. 4. Sofar as the Application seeking filing of the Revision is concerned, the Revision Application is required to be considered on merits. 5. Admit. 6. Notice, returnable on 20.12.2010. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp