IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1775 of 2011(V) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. LEKSHMI.V.K., D/O.C.KESAVAN NAIR, TC 48/673, LALITHA BHAVAN, AMBALATHARA, POONTHURA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-26. 2. DEEPIKA V.NAIR, D/O.VIJAYAKUMARI.P., PADMASREE, THEKKEKALATHARA MELE, ATHIYANOOR, ARALLUMOODU.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SARANYA SASI, D/O.SASI, 'SWAYAMVARA' DEVIPURAM, POWDICONAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. ABINA BALU, D/O.V.BALACHANDRAN, ALGORE, VINAYAKA LANE, GANDHIPURAM, SREEKARIYAM.P.O. 5. KAVYA KANJIKKAL, S/O.BHUVANESWARI.P.S., THINAVILA, KANJIKKAL, PANTHALACODE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-28. 6. STEPHY LOPEZ, D/O.LOPEZ, MARIA NIVAS, VIKAS NAGAR, SREKARYAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. REVATHY.R., D/O.SREEKANTAN NAIR, REVATHY, CHERUVALKAL, SREEKARIYAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 8. ATHIRA ARJUN, D/O.A.ARJUNAN, ATHIRA, TC 75/1470, SN NAGAR, PETTA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-24. 9. JISHA DAS, D/O.JNANADIS, J.J.BHAVAN, FLAT NO.209, RAJAJI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 10. SHARI S.NAIR, D/O.SUSUPALAN NAIR.R., S.P.NIVAS, VENJARAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.GIRISH. W.P.(C). NO.1775/2011-V: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC ISNSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001. 2. GENERAL CONVENER, KERALA STATE SCHOOL YUVAJANOLSAVAM 2010-11, KOTTAYAM & DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001. 3. THE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT APPELLATE COMMITTEE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVENUE DISTRICT KALOLSAVAM 2010-11, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.1775 OF 2011(V) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Thiruvananthapuram District Kalolsavam petitioners' team participated in Oppana. According to them they have been awarded A Grade. The appeal filed was rejected. It is in this circumstances the writ petition is filed 2. Instructions of the Government Pleader shows that while the first prize winner being secured 248 marks, petitioner team secured 210 marks. It is also his instruction that appeal has already been rejected. Apart from the vide disparity in the marks and that the first prize winner has not been impleaded in this writ petition, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that due to inadequacy of space in the stage, the petitioners' team could not perform well. Even if there is substance in what is contended, fact remains that same stage alone was available for all the participants. If that be so, all the participants would have suffered the same inconvenience and no prejudice special to the petitioners could have been caused. In that view also, this court will not be justified in interfering with the assessment of the WPC.No. 1775/2011 :2 : performance done by the judges. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/