's- ^ s HIGH COURTOF GHHATTISGARH: BtLASPUR SingleBench: Hon'ble Shri DiljpRaosaheb Deshmukh, .1. M.C.G. No,5iafl(2007 Appiicants 1. Mewa Ram, aged about TO yeare, S/oJhamman 2. Bahadur, S/o Bali, aged about 45 years, 3. Sahadur, S/o Bali, aged about 37 years, 4. Nanku,S/o Baliagedabout37 ^are, 5. Sammelal S/o Bali, caste Chamar agedab6yt33years, 6. l-1eerachand, S/oBali.easteChamar, 7. Sukru, s/oBali, Caste i Chaniar, aged ab6ut23yeare. All Rfo^ Village DavRa, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Sarguja ^(^ Versus 1. Ghuran S/o Late fiarjan, ©asto Chamar, aged about85 years; R/o Vjllage Dawana, Tahsil Surajpur.Distt. Surguja(CG) 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through:- Coltector, SurflUja at Ambikapur (CG) ' ADDticati6nforrestorationofS;A.(PR)l»o.3814a006 Present:- : • :' .'::: :1 , , . ' - Shri D.N. Prajapati,counselfortheap|»licants. Shri ^khil Agrawal, PLforState. . Non-ADDlicants ",?"; •*?•— -^••^•^ ORALORDER - (Passedon 28.11.2007) This, M.C.C js being finalty djsposad of' at the stage ef admission. It arises out of the order d^ed 24.10.2007 passedin SA. (PR) No.3814QCX)6, whereby since despite suffteient opportufiity, Va^afefriaroa'was notfiled bytheappticantsinftivourefthecouhsel whoappearedbeforetheCourt.theappeplwasdismisSedindstaitlt. (2) Leamed counsel for the ;applicarrts subraittsd that the applicants have now executed 'Vakalatnama'm his favour. -2i -cl (3) . Gonsidering the laches on the part of the applieants, this M.C.C.No.518Q007isallowedsubjecttodepositofRs.3( /-withthe High Court Legal A'd Committee, within a week, (4) Uponsuch deposit being made, S.A.(PR) NQ381.®2a)6shalt stand restored to file and b®listed.;—-—"" Sd/— Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^' y;' /' r