IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2011 / 14TH POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 1143 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.31423/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M.D.SEBASTIAN,S/O.DEVASSIA, AGED 65 , MULLONKAL HOUOSE, THERTHALLY P.O., ALAKODE AMSOM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI SRI.V.A.SATHEESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, KANNUR DIVISION,THAVAKKARA, KANNUR-2 SC SRI.P.M.R NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------------------- R.P. NO.1143 OF 2010(C) in WP(c).NO.31423/2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011 O R D E R The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 13th October, 2010, accepting the contention of the respondents that the petitioner has liability to pay dues of the Housing Board and that in the absence of any One Time Settlement Scheme in vogue this court cannot direct that the petitioner should be given the benefit of such scheme. 2. In this Review Petition petitioner seeks review of the judgment mainly contending that a One Time Settlement Scheme is in existence. Taking note of the submission, it is clarified that, if any such scheme is in vogue, it will be open to the petitioner to seek the benefit thereof and the judgment will not stand in his way of claiming the same. Review Petition is disposed of with the said clarification. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :