IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27753 of 2007 Between: Ramesh Ram Hariram ..... Petitioner AND 1.Joint Collector and Licencing Authority, Ananthapur District and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr.K.Durga Prasad Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Home The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice, dated 12-12-2007, in Rc. No. Mc2/6481/2007 as illegal, null, void and arbitrary and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to transfer the license of M/s. Geetha Chitralaya in favour of the petitioner and pass such other appropriate orders as are deemed fit and proper in the interests of justice.” Sri K.Durga Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioner, sought for permission of the Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition in terms of letter, dated 28- 04-2011, filed by him in the Registry. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 27-12-2007, as extended from time to time, is vacated and WPMP.No.36300 of 2007, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 10th June, 2011 lur This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings No.PC/(Lands-I)/533/07, dated 16-10-2009, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of aRtiles 14, 21 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and for a consequential order directing the respondents to extend the lease for a period of 20 years by considering the representation, dated 22-10-2009, and also by taking the cases of other lessees, who are similarly situated, into consideration.” Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned Counsel for the petitioner, circulated letter, dated 12-03-2010, to the Registry wherein he stated that his client instructed him to withdraw the Writ Petition in view of the order passed by the Government of A.P., vide G.O.Ms.No.3, dated 11- 03-2010. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 27-10-2009, is vacated and WPMP.No.30048 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.