CRM-M-28508 of 2011 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-28508 of 2011 Date of Decision:04.11.2011 Khursheed . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.R.S. Tacoria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for bail pending trial in a case registered vide FIR No.57 dated 20.6.2010 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 307, 506 & 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short ‘the Act’) at Police Station Hassanpur, District Palwal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this is a case of cross-version in which the petitioner recorded the first version vide FIR No.56 dated 19.6.2010 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 307 & 506 of the IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Act. On the subsequent date, the present FIR was registered in which the allegation against the petitioner is that he had fired two shots at Digamber and Ram Parsad but insofar as the injury is concerned that has not been opined to be dangerous to life. In this regard, he has referred to the opinion of the Doctor which is reproduced in para No.4 of the petition and the same is admitted to be correct by counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Kanwar Singh, who has further submitted that injury was also caused by the petitioner to Ram Parsad on his right hand but that has not been found to be dangerous to life. Learned counsel for the CRM-M-28508 of 2011 - 2 - petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 17.5.2011 and it is yet to be determined that which party was aggressor as both the parties have suffered various injuries. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on the merits, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 04, 2011 JUDGE Vivek