IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16820 of 2007 SMT.SUMAN KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 17.09.2010 This case has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner who points out that though the prayer made in the writ application was for payment of balance amount of salary of the petitioner from the period August 2005 onwards but in the order dated 6.8.2010 at page 3 in the second paragraph at 5th line, the period has been mentioned as August 2007. Considering the materials on record, this Court would find that period "August 2007" in the 5th line from the bottom at page 3 of the order dated 6.8.2010 should be substituted by word "August 2005" as similarly the date "16.8.2007" mentioned in third line from bottom at page three of the same order should be read as 16.8.2005. It is, however, made clear that while calculating the amount of salary from month August 2005 not only the authority would verify the actual working of the petitioner on the post held by her but also 2 the amount of Rs.66606.00/- which as per the chart contained in Annexure-15 submitted by the petitioner in the writ petition shown to have already been paid towards her salary and emolument for the period August 2005 onwards should be deducted from the amount found payable to her. The order of this Court dated 06.8.2010 accordingly stands modified to the aforementioned extent. Kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)