IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11884 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 08, 2010. Tarsem Lal and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are the land owners whose land was statedly acquired for the development of Sectors 25 to 28 by the HUDA in Panchkula. They seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to allot them plots under the Oustee's Policy in Sector27, Panchkula or in any other urban estate in Panchkula developed by HUDA. Reliance is placed on the directions issued by this Court in somewhat similar circumstances in Civil Writ Petition No.20456 of 2006 (Ashok Kumar versus State of Haryana and others) decided on 21.8.2008. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they have applied for allotment of plots under the Oustee's quota, their applications (Annexures P-20 to P-30) are still pending consideration and no decision has been taken thereon so far. C.W.P.No .11884 of 2010 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing any views with regard to entitlement of the petitioners for allotment of the plots, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.1 & 2 to consider and dispose of the afore-mentioned claim of the petitioners by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 08, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE