wp4054-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4054 OF 2011 Mrs.Usha Ankush Mane .. Petitioner versus Kurla Kajrolkar CHS Ltd & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil for the petitioner. Mr.Anoop Sharma i/by G.K.Trivedir for respondent No.2. Mrs.M.S.Bane, A.G.P for respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 30th JUNE 2011. P.C.: . Heard both sides. The orders that are impugned in this petition are date 26th October 2010 and 9th May 2011. These are passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, MHADA and the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co- operative Societies, Mumbai Division, Mumbai, respectively. It is unfortunate that both the orders do not assign any reason as to how the ingredients of section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co- wp4054-11.doc 2 operative Societies Act, 1960 are satisfied. There is absolutely no indication from the impugned orders as to why the Deputy Registrar feels that the appeal of Shantabai should be allowed and the Society should be directed to enroll and admit her as a member. At the same time, there are no reasons as to why the claim of the original respondent No.2-petitioner before me, Usha Mane deserves to be rejected. 2 For all these reasons, both the orders are set aside. The matter shall now be heard by the Deputy Registrar, MHADA after giving an opportunity to both sides. He shall make a fresh order assigning cogent and satisfactory reasons. While passing a fresh order, he should not be influenced by any of the observations and findings rendered by either him or the Divisional Joint Registrar. The matter should be disposed off within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the parties. The writ petition allowed in these terms. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)