IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.18471 of 2008 Date of decision: 04.08.2009 IC 12063 P Lt. Col. (T.S.) Dalvinder Singh resident of H. No.304, Sector 35-A, Chandigarh. ......Petitioner The Union of India, Ministry of Defence and others. ......Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present: Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate for the respondents. ----- PERMOD KOHLI, J. (ORAL) It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that this case is covered by a judgment of Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.8939 of 2007 decided on 6.3.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the respondents are recovering more amount than what was paid in lump sum to the petitioner in the form of commuted value. This fact is disputed by the other side. In view of the judgment referred above, this petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondents regarding excess recovery, if any. If such a representation is filed within a period of one month, the same shall be decided by the respondents by passing a speaking and well reasoned order thereafter within a period of four months, in accordance with law. (PERMOD KOHLI) August 4, 2009 JUDGE Poonam