1 CA-3719.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3719 OF 2010 Gopalkrishna Narayan Alva .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri H.E. Mooman for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 P.C: 1. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail since he has been arrested in connection with an offence of dacoity. The offence took place on 21-4-2007. The applicant and others were arrested in the year 2009, after being transferred from Bangalore. The applicant has been identified by eye-witnesses at the test identification parade. Though there is no recovery at the instance of the applicant, and there could have been none since the applicant and others were arrested two years after the incident, that in itself does not indicate that the applicant has been needlessly arrested. As to the deviations by the learned Magistrate 2 CA-3719.10 holding the test identification parade, those would be looked into at the trial and if found serious, the learned trial Judge would undoubtedly consider granting benefit of the same to the applicant. At this stage, in view of the fact that eye-witnesses have identified the applicant in the test identification parade, the applicant is not entitled to bail. The application is rejected. 2. The prosecution shall ensure that the trial is expeditiously conducted by the Sessions Judge and as far as possible the same shall be completed within a period of six months. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)