IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 RP.No. 176 of 2001(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.10321/2001 Dated 26/03/2001 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------ 1. BIYYUTTY, W/O.MOOSA MASTER, PERUMBALLI BUILDINGS, KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. PERUMBALLI MUHAMMED MASTER, S/O.MUHAMMED KURIKKAL, DOCUMENT WRITER, PERUMBALLI BUILDINGS, KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS, MALAPPURAM. 2. MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADERMR.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.176 of 2001 in O.P.No.10321 of 2001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 29th November, 2007 ORDER Learned counsel for the review petitioners seeks an adjournment. But in my opinion, it is not necessary to adjourn the matter any further. The Review Petition will stand dismissed. However, the dismissal of this Review Petition and the currency of the judgment sought to be reviewed will not stand in the way of the petitioners initiating fresh proceedings on the basis of fresh cause of action. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE