IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13359 of 2000 Between: The State Level Police Recruitment Board, rep. by its Chairman, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad and two others. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND P.Mallaiah .....RESPONDENT(S) HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY W.P.No.13359 of 2000 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Swaroop Reddy) This writ petition is filed questioning the legality and validity of the order passed in O.A.No.2977 of 1999 dated 05-10-1999 by the the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’), and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The brief facts, which led to file the writ petition, are that the respondent herein was selected as a Sub Inspector of Police in 1996, under Sports Quota, from Zone V, Warangal. After appointment orders were issued, he was summoned for training at A.P. Police Academy, Hyderabad, but he sent a representation, dated 16-01-1998 expressing his inability to undergo basic training of Sub Inspector of police (Civil) as he had suffered a fracture to his right leg and requested the petitioners authorities to permit him to join training in the next batch. He also submitted a Medical Certificate, which indicated that he suffered a major fracture in thigh bone and a metal rod was inserted. The petitioners authorities, after considering his request, rejected his representation and cancelled his appointment. Challenging the same, he filed O.A.No.2977 of 1999 before the Tribunal, and the Tribunal allowed the O.A. directing the petitioners authorities to issue appointment order to the respondent and also take steps for sending him for training in the subsequent batch. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners authorities approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 3. During the pendency of this writ petition, no interim order was passed by this Court. 4. After filing the writ petition, the petitioners authorities issued orders appointing the respondent as Sub Inspector of Police, vide proceedings dated 21-09-2000, and a copy of the said proceedings is also placed on record. 5. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has completed the training and now he is working successfully as Sub Inspector of Police for nine years. The submission of the learned counsel for the respondent is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Services-II, appearing for the petitioners- authorities. 6. Considering the circumstances, and in view of the fact that the respondent, who was initially held to be unfit for the post of Sub Inspector of Police on account of suffering a fracture, was subsequently taken into service, by virtue of the orders of the Tribunal, and as he has been working as Sub Inspector of Police and discharging all the functions successfully, we see no grounds to pass any orders in this writ petition at this stage, and therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH ___________________________ 13th August 2009 JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY Kvr