IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15344 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JYOTHY ANTONY, D/O. ANTONY.P.V, PARAKUZHY HOUSE, CHERUKARA, PERUMPANACHI.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SUNIL SMT.S.CHITHRA SRI. A.S.BRIJESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).15344/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is an MBBS student studying in the Medical College, Calicut, appeared for the Final year MBBS Examination Professional Part-II in February, 2009. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in two papers, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Final year MBBS Examination Professional Part-II in February, 2009. Her application for revaluation is pending before the respondents since 1.4.2009. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of W.P.(C).15344/09 2 the revaluation sought for by the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs