tlWilEBENGH W THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. ^o.3a3^ /06 PETITIO?(ER i ..-("'^- .n'Si-'cy--- i^ f-f (N..'' -•••" ^-^s?-'"' .<••'''' ..,..-^x <€^" ^y 'Harman Michal Khalkho, S/o Late Shri Claiment Khalkho Aged about$OYrs. Asst. Regional Transport Officer, Presently posted at, Regional Transport Office, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT -1. StateofC.G. Through : Additional Secretary, Transport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3,. Regional Transport Authority Raipur(C.G.) Transport Commissioner, Bus Stand, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.). ShriS.N.Singh Regional Transport Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. WRITS. ORDER, DIRECTIONS ETC. S'''~msw~'s^siKsass_ XI-HC-78 *ll*lWl Sb*ll<*> S^^TraRTO, yifltt'IS, Rldltiy < •1~»T»^> »>*«^ ^~»-(•"»^<t-3» * tf » ^•^- W3[ 200^ Sll^i'l l^th (yiI^at^eT) •CT^TW^TR? gqTSTI^Tsbtllcb ^sn^c^ .^ ^' SRnWHferw^r 30-6-2006 Mr. Maneesh Sharma.counsei Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt |to3. Mr. N.K. Vyas, counsel for resFJondent No.4. Heard. By this writ petition, the petitio dated 24-6-2006, whereby he has bei 'main ground of challenge is that thi period often months, bsoause eariierlten months back he was transferred from [Korba to Raipur and now, he was aga| !t is settied law that the trart Iquestioned on the ground of incompj Itransfer order, the transfer is mala fid^ the statutory rutes. Learned counsel for the petjtj effected within a short span of time, make a representation raising his tearned counsel appearing for the Sta| Having heard tearned counse) facts and circumstances of the cai representation to respondent No.1 respondent No.1 is directed to decid< acoordance with law, within a period (jif 30 days from the date of its receipt. Withthe direction aforesaid, th in view of this order, M.(W.)P.^| Parties are entitled for certifiecj copy of this order. +wfd41^ t|IKdTffto3'<Rf*4K ^3rf^1T3I^5T Ifor the petitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 er has questioned the i^atity of the order n transferred from Raipur to Kanker. The petitioner has been transferred within a n transferred from Raipur to Kanker. fer of an employee can be successfulty itence of the Offlcer who has issued the ^6V? ^ afi^ the same has been made contrary to l/ loner submits that the transfer has been ^erefore, the petitioner may be ailowed to lifficulties to respondent No.1, to which te/respondents No.1 to 3 has no objeotion. for the parties and having regard to the >e, the pelitioner is aliowed to make a within 10 days from today and in turn, ? the representation on its own merits, in petition stands disposed of. o.2361/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge