1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.202 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.202 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.202 OF 2004 Shri Sant Goroba Shikshan Sanstha ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade for Petitioner Mr.S.K.Chinchalikar, A.G.P. for Respondents CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 3RD MARCH, 2005. DATE: 3RD MARCH, 2005. DATE: 3RD MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Pursuant to show-cause notice as to why the Management of the school should not be taken over by order dated 9th April, 2003, the Director of Education appointed an Administrator initially for a period of two years from 10th April, 2003 apart from the reasons given reference was also made to the order passed by this Court in the Writ Petition filed by teachers of the School in Writ Petition No.3477 of 1990 dated 1st October, 2002 for taking over the management on the ground of mismanagement. The appeal preferred by the Petitioner was dismissed by the Appellate Authority by order dated 19th July, 2003. It is that order which is the subject matter of the present Petition. . The Petition itself was filed on 19th December, 2003. Considering the material on record 2 the earlier petition filed before this Court, the grievance addressed by the teachers and the fact the Governmental Authorities themselves were inquiring into the affairs of the school, in our opinion this would not be a fit case for this Court to interfere in the impugned order appointing Administrator. The order is to bring the affairs of the School back on track. . We however, find that order itself shows that if there will be no improvement in the management during that period, the same would be extended further. The period would expire on 9th April, 2005. It is for the Petitioner within two weeks from today to make representation to the Authority which passed the order, and for the Authority, after considering the material, produced by the petitioner and other material before it to decide whether to further continue Administrator or discharge the Administrator. . With the above observations Petition disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) 3 (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)