IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6070 of 2009 UPENDRA SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police Case under Section 392 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the F.I.R. is against unknown and that the petitioner has no antecedent. It is apparent from the impugned order of rejection after noticing the materials in the case diary that the case of the prosecution appears to be built up only on the confession of the accused before the Police, inadmissible in evidence. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Supaul in Bhaptiahi P.S. case No. 63 of 2008. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)