CWP No.20309 of 2009 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.20309 of 2009 (O&M) Dated: 30th August, 2011 M/s Sardar Udyog Samiti (Regd.) Badrukhan, Sangrur, through its Secretary Sh. Harpreet Singh son of Rajinder Singh, Rajgarh Road, village Rajinderpura, P.O. Dhanaula, Tehsil & District Barnala. … Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab through the Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Punjab, Chandigarh. … Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Pardeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate, for respondent No.7. Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Advocate, for respondent No.9. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO CWP No.20309 of 2009 (O&M) [2] 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that supplies have not been issued because there is a default in his part and decree has been obtained by the Corporation against the petitioner. The petitioner contends that the decree is subject of challenge in the appeal and there is also a stay of recovery of the amount passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court. Having regard to the fact that it could still take a few years before the case is concluded, in my view, the petitioner shall have the benefit of supplies if, the petitioner pays every year 25% of the amount secured under the decree by the Corporation and if such payment is made by the petitioner, the respondents shall issue necessary orders permitting supplies. For the balance amount, if any, the petitioner will give an undertaking that in the event of the decree being/has been rendered final in appeal, he shall make the payment within 8 weeks from the date of order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of with the above terms. August 30, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE