IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11249 of 2009 MD.DAMRI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 08/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also for the complainant. The application for anticipatory bail of the petitioners on the previous occasion was dismissed as withdrawn. Renewing the prayer for anticipatory bail learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations under the Indian Penal Code are bailable. In so far as the S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is concerned, the submission is of a subsequent compromise between the parties. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that he stands by the compromise and does not oppose the application. The application is disposed with the observation that any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered preferably on the date that the petitioners shall surrender in the background of the compromise arrived at between the parties, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)