IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8402 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision:23.09.2011 Chief Engineer, Union Territory, Chandigarh, and others. ...Petitioners versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, U.T., Chandigarh, and another. ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. By an award of the Labour Court, the 2nd respondent secured the relief of computation that included the period of service upto 60 years when he was superannuated. The contention of the Management that the number of years of service would be computed only upto 58 years and that the extension sought for upto the period of 60 years cannot be availed, was rejected. 2. The award is being challenged at the instance of the Management under whom the petitioner was working. There is no Civil Writ Petition No.8402 of 1989 (O&M) - 2 - representation for the petitioners. The counsel for the 2nd respondent, however, is present and ready. The writ petition is dismissed for default. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 23.09.2011 sanjeev