IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5247 of 2009 1. BISHWANATH SAHU @ BISHWANATH SAH 2. SANJAY KUMAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 15.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners, who are accused for offences punishable under sections 363 AND 366A/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire allegation is false and frivolous as the victim girl after being recovered has given her statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but has not named the petitioners in any manner whatsoever, rather she has stated that she had gone to house of her own elder sister as per her free will because her father wanted to marry her to a person whom she did not like. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, let both the petitioners, namely, (i) Bishwanath Sahu alias Bishwanath Sah and (ii) Sanjay Kumar Sah be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani (District Madhubani ) in connection with 2 Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 183/2006 dated 16.11.2006 corresponding to G.R. No. 1918/2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )