IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23882 of 2008 SUNIL RAM @ BHOKI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.7.2008 Heard the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 364, 302 and 201/34 of the Penal Code. It appears that there is an allegation that the informant and the victim had identified this petitioner during the occurrence. The case is of 2001 and the petitioner surrendered after a great delay. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the co-accused persons who are similarly situated to the petitioner and were named by the informant and the victim, have been acquitted by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, FTC I, Jehanabad vide judgment, dated 11.3.2004 in S.T. No. 26/2004 on the ground that the informant and the other witnesses did not name or identify the persons put on trial. Considering the aforesaid facts, the petitioner SunilRam @ Bhoki are directed to be released on bail in S.T.No. 40/2008 arising out of Kako (Pali) PS Case No. 28/2001 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J., F.T.C. II, Jehanabad. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)