IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2007 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 882 OF 2004. Kokila Manohar Bhavsar & Anr. .. ...... ......Appellants. V/s Sulochana Vasant Bhavsar......... ...... ......Respondent. Mr.Sachin Chavan i/by Mr.S.S.Kulkarni, Adv. For the appellant. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 13th JANUARY, 2009. PC: This second appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court which is confirmed in the appeal awarding mesne profits. Suit for possession filed by respondent was decreed. In the said suit an official from CIDCO was examined to ascertain the rent/mesne profits of the suit property. Suit property is a flat admeasuring 800 sq.ft. developed by CIDCO. The witness categorically deposed that flat would atleast fetch Rs.800/- per month. The mesne profits are granted at the same rate. The only ground urged in this appeal is that mesne profits could only be ordered for a period subsequent to the passing of the decree and not from the date of the suit. This submission is wholly ill founded and is contrary to the express language used in Order 20 Rule 12(c). No question of law, much less substantial question of law, is involved in 1 the present appeal. Hence appeal stands dismissed summarily. In view of the disposal of the appeal Civil Application No.882 of 2004 does not survive and the same stands disposed of accordingly. 13.01.2009. 2