1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY : NAGPUR BENCH : N A G P U R. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2707 OF 2009 Vinod Namdeorao Satpute & ors. -VERSUS - Anmol Vinayakrao Dhepe & anr. .... Mr. H.D. Dangre Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. R.N. Khare Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. A.S. Sonare, APP, for Res. no.2. .... CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : 07 th JANUARY, 2010. COURT'S ORDER : Learned counsel for the applicants as well as respondent no.1 have tendered a joint pursis signed by them on behalf of their respective clients. Same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The counsel points out that Criminal Application 19 of 2010 seeking to compound the offences has also been filed on affidavit by both the contesting parties. 2. The counsel for the contesting parties have jointly submitted that their respective clients have settled dispute amongst themselves arising in the present case. Both of them want to have goods relations and do not 2 want to litigate in order to have continuance of good relationship. The subject matter related to the personal dispute amongst them and has no flavour of any public grievance. The matter being personal between them, they should be allowed to compound the offences which are not compoundable by exercising inherent jurisdiction of this Court. 3. The counsel for the applicants relied on Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Abasaheb Yada Honmane v. State of Maharashtra and Ashwani Abasaheb Honmane – 2008(2) Mh.L.J. 856 and argued that the Full Bench of this Court has interpreted the power of this Court under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code also to mean that compounding non-compoundable offences can be allowed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the particular case. 4. Having gone through the said decision, I am satisfied that this being personal dispute between the applicants and non-applicant no.1, it is a fit case to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to grant the prayer made by the counsel for the applicants and non-applicant no.1. In view of this, Criminal Application No.19 of 2010 is allowed in terms of its prayer. Consequently, Crim. Appln. No. 2707 of 2009 stands disposed of in above terms. No costs. JUDGE