CW 14029/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** 1-Civil Writ Petition No.14029/2009 Kuldeep Singh Versus State & Ors. 2-Civil Writ Petition No.13075/2009 Mohanlal Bairwa & Anr Versus State & Ors. 3-Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2009 Rekha Devi Sharma Versus State & Ors. 4-Civil Writ Petition No.14360/2009 Mahesh Chand Versus RPSC & Ors. 5-Civil Writ Petition No.13656/2009 Om Prakash Saini Versus State & Ors. 6-Civil Writ Petition No.15269/2009 Meena Kumari Yadav Versus State & Ors. 7-Civil Writ Petition No.7924/2010 Kailash Versus State & Ors. Date of Order ::: 17/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. SK Gupta, Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Mr. Intjar Ali, Mr. Sargam Jain, Ashwini Jaiman, Mr.Sunil Singodia, Mr. Ram Pratap Saini & Mr.Uma Shankar, for petitioner Mr. SN Kumawat, AAG for respondents-State & RPSC Mr. Ganesh Meena, Govt. Counsel for respondents. All these petitions since involve identical controversy were heard together and are being disposed of at admission stage by present order. Counsel submits that controversy raised herein has been decided by this Court in CWP-12621/2009 (Hari Singh & Ors Vs. State & Ors) & cognate Cases) vide judgment passed today (dt.17/08/2010) observing ad infra: “In the opinion of this Court, contention advanced by respondents stands falsified by acknowledged test- books having been commonly read over by students in the State and approved CW 14029/09 //2// by Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Ajmer which leaves no room for doubt that the answer given by petitioners to Q.20 of Series A & corresponding questions of other Series is correct and the key answer supplied by paper setter adopted by respondent-PSC is incorrect. Consequently, writ petitions are hereby allowed. Respondents are directed to treat option (3) (Abdul Fazal) to Q.20 of Series A & its corresponding Questions of other series as correct answer thereto and accordingly such of petitioners and applicants who have not approached this Court but attempted option (3) (Abdul Fazal) to Q.20 of Series A & its corresponding Questions of other series as their answer thereto, their result be revised and such of applicants including petitioners whose names ultimately find place in select list which is supposed to be revised as a consequence of directions (supra) may be considered for appointment for the post of Teacher Gr.III pursuant to advertisement dt.20/06/2008.Compliance be made within two months. No costs.” As regards judgments (supra), it has not been disputed by Government Counsel about controversy being decided by this Court. In the light of observations quoted (supra), these petitions stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 14029CW2009Aug17(7)Q20KhmnorGA.doc