IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2747 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SULTANALI GULAMHUSAIN BIJWANI Versus CHIEF OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2747 of 2000 MR PJ YAGNIK for Petitioner No. 1 MR MINESH C DAVE for Respondent No. 1 Mr.Digant P. Joshi, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1,2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 06/03/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Minesh C. Dave, the learned advocate appearing for the Chief Officer, Limdi Nagarrpalika on his instructions makes a statement that the amount of gratuity is fully paid as per the order of the controlling authority in Gratuity Application No.29/99 (Annexure 'C' to the petition). He makes a further statement that an amount of Rs.38,000/- is payable towards Earned Leave, of which Rs.10,000/-, is already paid and the remaining amount will be paid in three instalments; first two instalments will be of Rs.10,000/- each and the third one will be of the remainder. The Chief Officer is directed to file an undertaking to this effect on or before 17.3.2003 stating that the first instalment of Rs.10,000/-, will be paid on or before 7th April 2003 and thereafter the second and third instalments will be paid on or before the 7th day of successive months. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (Ravi R. Tripathi, J.) karim