IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2008 / 6TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 728 of 2008() ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.13820/2000 Dated 09/08/2007 REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS ----------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR - 680 656, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. R.RAVINDRAN NAIR, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELETRICAL SUB DIVISION, COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, VELLAYANI. 2. T.K.ABDUL KHADER, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ENGINEERING SUB DIVISION, VELLAYANI. BY ADV.P.SREEKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Revision Petition No.728 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2008 O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners and also Adv.Sri.P.Sreekumar on behalf of the private respondents and the writ petitioner, who has filed Cont.Court Case No.933/2008, which is also listed along with this matter. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that no ground for review is made out since there is no error apparent on the face of the recurred of the judgment. The learned counsel for the review petitioners has pointed out that though the net result of the writ petition would have been only the judgment sought to be reviewed, there is a communication gap between the university and its standing counsel and hence, the university authorities, the review petitioners, may be granted more time to comply with the judgment. This is recorded and R.P.No.728/2008 - 2 - review petition is closed ordering that the directions contained in the judgment dated 09-08-2007 will be complied with within an outer limit of four months from now. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE skr/29/7