IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6231 of 2011 DHARMATMA PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was instituted in 1998 and in 1999 final form was submitted as the case true but no clue which gets reflected from Annexure-2. The final form was accepted in 2000 by the learned court below. After eight years of the same, in 2008 an application was filed by the police for permission to reinvestigate the matter. The matter is still under investigation. The order was for reinvestigation was made in 2008. The order of reinvestigation created apprehension in the mind of the petitioner. Though it is submitted that reinvestigation is not permissible but this Court is not inclined to deal with the said issue at present. Since after several years of 2 submission of the final form reinvestigation has been permitted and a statement has been made in paragraph no.20 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 102 of 1998 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)