IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1351 OF 2009 (MS) Mamta Singh ………….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……….Respondents. Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. 4th November, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner was selected for Special B.T.C. training for the year, 2007-08 in District Education and Training Institute, Ramnagar, Roorkee, District Haridwar. This special training course is divided into two parts A) theoretical and B) practical training. The contention of the petitioner is that whereas she has completed practical training, but due to illness during the period when she was undergoing the theoretical training, she could not complete it and when she applied for the admission for completion of her theoretical training, it was denied to her. Hence, this writ petition. The petitioner has stated in the writ petition that last batch of Special B.T.C. is going on at D.I.E.T. Dehradun and in case the petitioner is not given admission, she will not be able to complete her training. Since the petitioner has already completed the practical part training and it was an admitted fact that the last 2 course was going on at D.I.E.T. Dehradun, this Court vide interim order dated 18th September, 2009 directed the D.I.E.T. Dehradun to give admission to the petitioner in Special B.T.C. training and allow the petitioner to undergo training at D.I.E.T. The petitioner is undergoing the training. However, learned Standing Counsel for the State Sri N.P. Sah has quite fairly submitted that since the petitioner is already undergoing the training and she was qualified to undergo such a training and there is otherwise no material against the petitioner, therefore, petitioner may be allowed to complete the training and appear in the examination which is subsequent to such a training. Such a cause of action, under the circumstances, also appear to this Court both just and proper and therefore, this Court directs that in case the petitioner completes such training, she shall also be allowed to appear in the examination, for which the petitioner has to appear after completion of such training, and her result will also be accordingly declared. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 04.11.2009 Rathour