1 arbp281-06c vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.281 OF 2006 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. Prathima Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents Mr.Minoo Siodia with Mr.Nikhil Agarwal i/b M/s.Rustamji & Ginwala for the Petitioner. Ms.Gauri Godse for the Respondents. WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.305 OF 2006 Prathima Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Petitioners V/s. D.G.M. - O & F. & P, L.P.G. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ....Respondents Ms.Gauri Godse for the Petitioners. Mr.Minoo Siodia with Mr.Nikhil Agarwal i/b M/s.Rustamji & Ginwala for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.281 of 2006 is the respondent in Arbitration Petition No.305 of 2006 and the petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.305 of 2006 is the respondent in Arbitration Petition No.281 of 2006. 2 arbp281-06c 2. Both the petitions challenge an award dated 20.3.2006 made by a sole arbitrator. 3. Both the counsel state that the order in these petitions would follow the order and judgment dated 17.12.2009 passed by me in Arbitration Petition No.138 of 2006 and Arbitration Petition No.23 of 2006. In view of some of the reasons set out in the order and judgment dated 17.12.2009, the award in the present matters would also have to be set- aside. It is however, clarified that in view thereof, it was not necessary to consider any other additional submissions that both the learned counsel have made in support of their respective objections. 4. Subject to the above clarifications, both the arbitration petitions are disposed of by setting aside the award dated 20.3.2006. There shall be no order as to costs.