IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5855 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 13, 2010 Battan Devi and others …Petitioners Versus Jagdish and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 21.08.2010 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Palwal, thereby allowing the application moved by the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. impleading the petitioners as the defendants. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since the petitioners have been impleaded as defendants, they have C.R. No.5855 of 2010 every right to file written statement before the learned Trial Court and in the impugned order, the learned Trial Court has not made any provision to file written statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the petitioners shall be moving appropriate application before the learned Trial Court under Order 8 Rule 9 C.P.C. seeking permission to place on record subsequent pleadings in view of the fact that both the parties have colluded and they want to oust the petitioners newly impleaded defendants. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is clarified that if petitioners move an application under Order 8 Rule 9 C.P.C. seeking permission to place on record subsequent pleadings, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. September 13, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2