1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 786 OF 2010 Dnyandeo S/o Manaji Chavan ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT ......... Mr. K.B. Autade, advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, A.P.P. for respondent. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 14 th October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Advocate. 2. The learned Advocate would submit that now the investigation is completed and the chargesheet is filed, and therefore, the present application may be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh application for restoration of the custody of vehicle. 3. Allowed to withdraw with liberty to file afresh application before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Newasa or if the case is committed to the Sessions Court, then before Sessions Court for restoration of the custody of the vehicle. The application may be expeditiously disposed of on its own merits 2 without being influenced by the observations made in the earlier proceedings of restoration application and the observations of the learned Sessions Judge in Revision Application because prima facie, the Revisional Court appears to have taken incorrect view of the matter. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/criwp786.10