IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19736 of 2009 Date of Decision : March 04, 2010. Gagandeep Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Chopra, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Maninder, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the criteria of selection to the posts of Art and Craft Teachers. The petitioner has hypothetically pointed out that a candidate possessing irrelevant but higher qualifications can be selected as compared to a candidate who is not possessing such a higher qualification but has got better percentage in the relevant qualification. In my considered view, the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner at this stage is purely academic and need not be gone into by this C.W.P.No .19736 of 2009 2 Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction unless the selection is finalized and the apprehension expressed by the petitioner regarding selection of a candidate with irrelevant qualification is proved to be correct. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court at an appropriate stage. March 04, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE