IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9727 of 2010 MADHO MANDAL SON OF PRAYAG MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MADHOPUR, PO+PS – KAJRA, CIRCLE – SURYAGARHA, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORME, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORME, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, DARBHANGA DIVISION DARBHANGA. 5.THE COLLECTOR, MADHBANI. 6. THE LAND RECOR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MADHUBANIU. 7. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BISFI CIRCLE , MADHUBANI. ----------- 02. 29.06.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. From the averments made in the writ application, it appears that the petitioner retired on 30th of June 2009 from the post of Revenue Clerk in the office of Circle Officer, Bisfi, Madhubani, retiral dues of the petitioner as indicated in paragraph -10 of the writ application has remained to be settled. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for 2 the petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the respondent no. 5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)