IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.342 of 2008 SMT.KUMARI SEEMA SINHA, WIFE OF CHANDRA BHUSHAN RAM, D/O BIRENDRA PRASAD KUSHWAHA, R/O VILLAGE- PUNAS, P.O. TETARIAYA FACTORY, P.S. MADHUBAN, DISTRICT-MOTIHARI (EAST CHAMPARAN) -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA, 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, EAST CHAMPARAN, 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MOTIHARI. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PAKDIDAYAL, MOTIHARI. 6. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, MADHUBAN P.S., MOTIHARI. 7. BIRENDRA PRASAD, S/O PRAKASH BHAGAT, R/O VILLAGE-PUNAS, P.S. MADHUBAN, DISTT.- MOTIHARI, (EAST CHAMPARAN). 8. DWARIKA PRASAD, S/O PRAKASH BHAGAT, 9. RAMANAND PRASAD, S/O DWARIKA PRASAD. 10. PRAMOD KUMAR S/O HARINANDAN PRASAD. RESPONDENTS NO.8 TO 10 ARE R/O VILLAGE PUNAS, P.S. MADHUBAN, DISTT. MOTIHARI (EAST CHAMPARAN). -RESPONDENTS 2 19.02.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that as she had married according to her wishes, she is being harassed by her father and his relatives. Accordingly, prayer has been made for direction to the respondents to allow her to live peacefully. It seems that father of the petitioner had lodged Madhuban P.S. Case no. 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code for kidnapping of to petitioner. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader 1, for the State, and 2 taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it expedient that the Superintendent of Police, Motihari, ensures the conclusion of investigation without unnecessary delay. For that purpose if the petitioner appears before the Superintendent of Police he shall ensure that her statement is recorded by the Investigating Officer immediately. He shall also examine the threat perception of the petitioner and in case he is satisfied that petitioner needs protection he will provide that to her. The application stands disposed of with the directions aforesaid. (C.K. Prasad, ACJ.) AAhmad