: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.82 OF 2010 Rahul Shankar More & Anr. ... Appellants V/s. Junnar Taluka Bahudajana Sangh ... Respondent Mr.K.H. Holambe Patil for Appellants Mr.S.D. Rupwate i/b M.A. Ingole for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JANUARY 29, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appellants have approached this court against the order passed by the City Civil Court refusing interim relief to them. The suit has been filed by the appellants seeking a declaration that they are tenants of defendant No.2 in the suit premises without following due process of law. 2. The City Civil Court, on the basis of the pleadings and other material before it, has concluded that the appellants were activists of Respondent No.1 trust. They were asked to coach the students from the community for which the trust was formed. The trust thought it fit to depute the appellants to some other activities rather than continuing them in the educational activities of the trust. This has resulted in the present suit being filed. The City Civil Court in my view, has rightly refused the : 2 : injunction. The appellants prima facie has no right or vested interest to continue in the educational activities which are being conducted by the defendant No.1 trust in the premises. These activities are being conducted by the appellant for and on behalf of the defendant No.1. In my view, prima facie, the appellant cannot as a matter of right continue in the premises, which are admittedly procured by the defendant No.1 from the Mumbai Municipal Corporation for its activities. 3. Appeal is therefore dismissed.