Wm xdQaQ‘me/Qn 200 j a§w§w$(g¢§mg) WW”&%€TW Q8‘932QO9 Shri YaShWant Singh T r, Dy.A.G. for the State. Challenge in the pres t petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by the responent No.2 by which the petitioner who is working as Headmaster has been transferred showing him to be Hostel Superintendent in Hig Secondary School, Ranhat, Block Bairampur to Middle School, T Contention of counsel fo the petitioner is that in the impugned transfer order even his desigia'on has not been shown correctly and has been passed Without application of mind and there was no a nistrative exigency. He also submits that no one has been posted in place of the petitioner and wife of the petitioner is also working in a nearby place of posting of the petitioner. Contention of counsel fr the State is that let the petitioner make a representation to the rpondent No.2 and the same would be decided in accordance/with la Counsel for the petitio er agrees to make a representation. his representation is decided, the petitioner may be given some p otective order. Accordingly, the petiti- Shri V.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. h u h r uri, Block Kusmi. r that itself shows that this orde d i til However he submits that is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a represenion within a period of ten days from the date of receipt. 'bf the coy of this order, the same would be decided within a period of thr weeks from the date of its receipt. Till then the impugned order shall .ot be given effect to and the petitioner would he allowed to perform h duties in his present‘place of posting. t / pg” Isa/#— Pritinker Diwaker T I: Judge w o tt e i .