IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 14610 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.08.2011 Joginder Singh ..Petitioner Versus Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) The only grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala – respondent No.1 is neither deciding the revision (Annexure P/2) nor interim relief application (Annexure P/1) filed by him. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondent No.1 be directed to take decision on the revision and interim relief application within such time as fixed by this Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merit as well as maintainability of the revision and interim relief application, respondent No. 1 is directed to decide the revision and interim relief application within 6 months from the date certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) 11.08.2011 JUDGE som