S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 8674 of 2009 Prakash vs. State of Raj. ---- 30.10.2009 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Sanjay Mehrish, for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor. --- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. This bail application has been filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the accused petitioner contended that the co-accused have been released on bail by the orders of the coordinate Bench of this Court dated November 27, 2008 and November 3, 2008 passed in S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Applications Nos. 9169 of 2008 and 8261 of 2008. The case of the present accused petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who have been released on bail. The learned counsel for the accused petitioner contended that the accused petitioner is in judicial lock up for the last one month. There is no specific role of the accused petitioner. The main accused is Mangaram who has inflicted the injury to the injured. The Public Prosecutor opposed this argument. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the accused petitioner Prakash son of Hazari Lal shall be released on bail provided he shall submit bail bond in the amount of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 12,500/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before the trial court on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/