WP(C) 5646/2006 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr S Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr U K Goswami, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department. The four petitioners by filing this writ petition are seeking a directio n for regularization of their services as Teachers and also for a further direct ion for payment of their current salary as well as arrear salary stated to be du e since June’2001. The petitioners were appointed as Second Founder Teachers und er the Operation Blackboard Scheme (for short, ’the OBB scheme’) at a monthly st ipend of Rs. 900/- per month and they have also completed 1 (one) year Basic Tra ining Course after they have joined their services. Mr Goswami, learned Standing Counsel has drawn attention of this Court t o the affidavit filed on 25.6.2007 by the Director of Elementary Education, wher ein it is indicated that a proposal has already been given to the Government by letter No. EPD.1/2000/Pt.IV (B)/168 dated 25.5.2007, for retention of posts of t he teachers including that of the petitioners. The said document is marked as An nexure  5 to the counter affidavit. It is further submitted by Mr Goswami, that as the matter is now under a ctive consideration of the Government, this case may be ordered to be closed wit h a direction to the Government for consideration of the case of the writ petiti oners which is already under active consideration of the Government. The learned counsel for the petitioner similarly submits that it would b e appropriate to dispose of this writ petition by directing the Government to co nsider the case of the writ petitioners, who have made claim for regularization of their services and for payment of the salaries. In view of the aforesaid submissions and particularly in view of the fac t that the claims of large number of teachers such as the petitioners are now un der active consideration of the Government, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Government for considering the case of the writ petitioners. If aggrieved by any adverse decision of the respondent authorities, the petitio ners would be at liberty to file fresh writ petition before this Court. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands closed. .