IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2666 of 2010 Date of Decision : February 16, 2010. Sulakhan Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a retiree from the Education Department, Punjab. He seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to consider his representation/legal notice in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India and another versus SPS Vains (Retd.) and others, 2008 (2) SCC (L&S) 838 and consequently grant him the full arrears of pension and enhanced pensionary benefits. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the representation including legal notice dated 21.11.2009 (Annexure P-4) C.W.P.No .2666 of 2010 2 served on behalf of the petitioner, in the light of the above-referred judgment of the Supreme Court and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law and Government Policy as early as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. 16-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE