Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. Review Petition (M.C.C.) No. 76 of 2008 On behalf of Manager, Management Committee, S.D.P.C. Girls College, Roorkee. …………… Applicant/respondent No.3 IN Writ Petition (S/B) No.321 of 2004 Mrs. Kusum Lata Jain and Others ……. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Higher Education, Uttarakhand, Dehradun And others. …….. Respondents. Date: April 25, 2008. Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Hon’ble B.S.Verma,J. Heard Sri S.P.S.Panwar, learned Senior Advocate for the applicant/respondent No.3 and Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel as well as Sri H.M.Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent Nos. 1 & 2. 2. The respondent No.2- Director, Higher Education Uttaranchal, Haldwani and the respondent No.3- Manager, Management Committee, S.D.P.C. Girls College, Roorkee are present in Court. 2 3. Despite notice to petitioner No.4 (Mrs.Sunita Tayal) to appear before the Court personally today, she did not put her appearance personally or through counsel. 4. The review application is allowed. We recall our judgment dated 11.07.2006 in view of the statement that the petitioner No.4 (Mrs.Sunita Tayal) never taught in the institution after the expiry of one year of her initial appointment. The Director has rejected the application of petitioner No.4 claiming regularization. These facts were not brought to our notice and suppressed in the Court when we dictated the judgment in the petition. 5. Thus, in view of the fact stated at bar by Sri K.P.Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel and Sri S.P.S. Panwar, learned counsel for the applicant /respondent No.3 we find no merit in the writ petition. 6. The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (B.S.Verma,J.) ( P.C.Verma,J.) 25.04.2008 25.04.2008 P.Singh