: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.837 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1038 OF 2009 The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority & Anr. ... Applicants V/s. Aravali Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. ... Respondents Mr. Prakash G. Lad for the Applicants. Mr. Mahendra Ghelani i/b. M/s. Law Charters for the Respondents. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 31 ST AUGUST, 2009. P.C.: 1. The Civil Application has been filed for a stay of the impugned Judgment and Order dated 6th September, 2008. By this judgment, the defendant Nos.1 and 2 i.e. the applicants herein were restrained from acting in pursuance of the impugned letter dated 19th December, 2002. The applicants were further directed to inform the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay the final judgment in the Suit within 15 days from the date of the judgment. The plaintiff was given liberty to inform the Municipal Corporation in case of the applicants failure to do so, so as to enable the plaintiff to obtain the occupation and completion certificates. : 2 : 2. In my opinion, no stay can be granted at this stage when the applicants were directed to inform the Municipal Corporation within 15 days of the date of the impugned order. The impugned order was passed a year ago and, therefore, there can be no stay of clause (4) of the impugned order. As regards clause (5), the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents-Society states that an application has been made to the Municipal Corporation for issuance of the occupation and completion certificates. That application is still pending before the Municipal Corporation. Therefore, in my opinion, no orders staying the impugned order can be passed. In case the Municipal Corporation has not passed any orders in respect of the occupation and completion certificates to be issued to the respondents-society, those orders shall be passed in accordance with law. 3. The Civil Application is disposed of. .......