1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2224 OF 2011 *** 1. Shri Tandale contends that Respondent/ wife is a science trained graduate and is taking tuitions and earning about Rs.15,000/- per month. Petitioner is a new/ junior doctor in private practice and hence cannot afford to pay interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000/- per month. He further wants to invite attention of this Court to facts on merit to indicate that respondent/ wife is suffering from epilepsy and hence petitioner tried his best to get proper treatment for her. 2. The contention that Respondent/ wife is taking private tuitions is not substantiated and after considering relevant material trial Court has passed a reasoned order. Petitioner is a medical practitioner. Hence, I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:20/04/2011. ans/2224