IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36598 of 2010 1. HARIBOL SINGH 2. BHUTANI SINGH 3. MUNNA SINGH 4. VIJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are alleged for causing assault, but on that score alleged Sections of the Indian Penal Code is for bailable offences. Theft is said ornamental, but petitioner no.1 is alleged to abuse the informant in name of his caste “Scheduled Caste- Mushar, Harijan”. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner no.1 for anticipatory bail stands rejected as not maintainable. However, petitioner no.1 is at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejected order. So far as rest petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 are concerned, they are allowed anticipatory bail. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above 2 named petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Begusarai (Harijan) P.S. Case No.151 of 2010, G.R.No.912 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)