CRM-M No. 26577 of 2011 **** Surjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and another Present: Mr. SPS Sidhu , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab Mr. Depak, Advocate for Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** This is a petition for regular bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 43 dated 30.03.2011, under Sections 302/120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Ghall Khurd, District Ferozepur. On 07.11.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been found innocent by the police. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Palwinderr Singh, has accepted this fact. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant prays for a short adjournment that the arguing counsel had to go suddenly out of the Court for some personal work.” Today learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has accepted this factual assertion. However, he argues that there is a record of conversation between the main accused and the present petitioner which would tend to implicate the present petitioner. It is not disputed that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.03.2011. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE November 08, 2011 sunita