In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3322 of 2010 (O&M) Smt. Rita ..... Petitioner vs Hari Kishan and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Arun Singal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside order dated 16.3.2010 (Annexure P-2), whereby the application of the petitioner for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings was dismissed by the learned court below. Briefly the facts are that respondent no. 1 filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell against the petitioner/defendant no. 3 and respondents no. 2 and 3/defendants no. 1 and 2. All the defendants were served, however, the petitioner/defendant no. 3 did not appear, accordingly, she was proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 18.7.2005. She filed application for setting aside of order dated 18.7.2005, which was dismissed on 16.3.2010 by the learned court below. Admittedly, all the defendants are real brothers and sister. The property in question was inherited by them from their mother. It is not the case of the petitioner before the court below or this court that she is not in talking terms with his brothers. The suit was filed on 9.5.2005, wherein ex-parte order was passed on 18.7.2005 as inspite of service she did not choose to appear. The application for setting aside of that order was filed on 11.2.2010. The plea of the petitioner that she after marriage was residing at Rohtak and not at Panipat is also falsified as the address, at which she has been served in the suit, has been mentioned by her in the heading of the present petition and not the address of Rohtak. The learned court has rightly observed that the petitioner had complete knowledge about the pending proceedings from day one but she quietly kept on watching the same and now when the case was at the final stage she wanted to delay the proceedings. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed. 19.5.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge