^ ^ BEFORE THE_ STATE ADMINISTRATB^E TRIBUNAL, AT JABALPUR O .A.NOl.^>fct.^aOQO Petitioner Nohar Ram Yadav (Rawat) 5/o Anandi Rara Rawat, aged about 5 2 years , working as Uppsr Division Teacher, In the Government Mlddle school, Kewadabadi, Raigarh (M.P.) -VS. ResTiondents •nfy&v '; './^ .5 '../- 1,- :^ APPLICATION UKDER £ TE :..^^' State of Madhya pradesh through Secretary, Department o£ School EduGation, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal. Director, Public Instructions, Bhopal. District Educatlon offlcer, Raigarh District Raigarh, M.P. Zilla panchayat, Raigarh through its Chief Executive Officer at Post Office Distrlct Raigarh (M.P.)~ Mahadev Prasad Agrawa.1. Upper Divislon TeaSiec' Naveen Kanye H.lgh School. _Ra.tgarh, post offlce.an a D.1.5tr.l.ct-Rad.garh. Particulars of. the ^etitioner s- As set-out in the cause-title above. Particulars o£ the respondents ;- As set-out in tbe eause-title above, I, V? XI-HC—78 ^LAo^° \^ 3^T "l|l<11CI'i1, WTlly'IS, fslMI'Hy ....^.^az...^0^" 3nWT5R>' sn^i ^T R-lh ^sqr 3?r^r ^RI^ Tpifepih w?ft' 'q'ivS 'jv^K ^siRpTsn^r Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal. counsdl SIiri Ajit Siagh, Paiiel Lawj^' 1 to 4. None for respoadent No.5. Grievance of the petitionei^ the respondents are not passia^ claimiag gi'ant pf proforma senio^ Teacher from the date of passin| A perusal of meiuoraadl 3.12.199° shows that fhe Chief for the petitioner. er for fhe State/respondents No. Raigarh indicated to fh.e Dist^ regardiag fb.e grievaace oftlie petj Takiag into consideration would be served if fhe respondej wifh regan3 to fhe claim of the d his representation ofAnnex-are A-| Leanied coitasel for the lookiag to tlie natare of controv^rs iastELat petition can be disuosed ol Iii view offhe above, fhe m.s( witli a direction to tlie resuondeults as stated ia the petition is fhat any order on his 1-epresentati.oa [ity oa fiie post of Upper Division bf exainiaation. |uni of Aimexiu-e A-14, dated pxecutive Of5cer, Jila Paacliayat, |ict Ediication C'fScer, Raigarh Itloner. |tlie above fact, ends of justice tits are directed to take decision ;titioner as ventilated bv mrn ia -^ U-O j-espondents fairly siibmits that jrs;*' iavolved in fhis petitioa, the. Fm. above tericis. ^tant petition is fiaally disposed of No. l to 4 to take appropriate 113 dated 22.11,1999. ti , ^ss-:-£-~^^^ ^^.^^-^ -^^ fi^..^,.. ~i 1 %^. "-"""""XI-HC—78 .r7~> 's^(';:3n?n?ra, 'g^OTs, f^^iy^i 3^1 'T5R? (TPt3^ET) ~w, \ z wcas: ^ •tA^ ^r^^f^'-&•••••,^f. "K tu.,3'' 3- Siriha / peuponer decisioa on fhe claim of the peti^ione A-13, A-14 Bs A-15. Tbe respOEJdent s ,siak& a &esh representation if ft| ' ffie petitioner shaU be decidetl ''e^ped'i'Eicttis'K* aiid wdtliin a reasot It is made clear that opiuion on fiie inerits ofttie casd. as reflected froni Annexures |dent.s shaU aSlow the petitioaer to |e petitioaer so desires. The case of oy the conceiTted lespondeat iiable period. Is Cozirt has not expressed aay Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge M :^; 8 ^