-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.5390 OF 1991 Shri Ganpati Mangali Dorugade, Petitioner Vs Laxmi Sahakari Dudh V., Sanstha Maryadit and ors. Respondents Mr M.R.Suryawanshi, for the petitioner. Mr S.K.Chinchalikar, AGP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 30th August, 2005. DATE : 30th August, 2005. DATE : 30th August, 2005. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.3.1991 passed by the 15th respondent in the revision filed by the petitioner under section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. By that order, the judgment and order dated 29.12.1990 passed by the Registrar, Co-operative Society (DD), Maharashtra State, Mumbai in Revision Application No.30/90 had been confirmed. The operative part of the order dated 29.12.1990 reads thus: By virtue of powers vested in me under section 154 of the Maharashtra -2- Cooperative Societies Act,1960, I , Shri U.R.Shekokar, Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies (DD), Maharashtra State,Bombay hereby - (1) set aside the order dated 20th November,1990 issued by the Divisional Deputy Registrar Cooperative societies (Dairy),Pune, (2) the order dated 25.7.1990 issued by the Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (Dairy), Kolhapur is maintained, and (3) the elections of the Board of Directors should be conducted by the Administrator under the supervision and control of the Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (Dairy), Kolhapur and as per election Rules framed and approved by the Assistant Registrar." It appears that in pursuance of the directions given by the Jt.Registrar in paragraph 3 of the aforesaid order, the elections were conducted on 29.1.1991. The petitioner has, therefore, prayed for quashing and setting aside the aforesaid orders as well as the elections that were held on 29.1.1991. The term of the elected body got over long back. Keeping that in view and considering the orders impugned in the present writ petition and the prayers made therein, it is clear that this petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. Rule discharged. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) D.B.BHOSALE, J.) D.B.BHOSALE, J.)