ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2070 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2070 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 2070 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 37242 OF APPEAL (ST) NO. 37242 OF APPEAL (ST) NO. 37242 OF 1999 1999 1999 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.H.V.Kode i/by Mr. S.A.Sawant for the applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 19th September, 2007. : 19th September, 2007. : 19th September, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Though opposed by the respondent, considering the averments made in this application and para 4 of the rejoinder, I am of the view that the sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to condone the delay of 92 days. Resultantly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The appeal be listed for admission after due registration. 2. The civil application is disposed of, accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]