#2 10.02.2011 Present: Petitioners in person with ivir. Ashol< Kumar, Advocate. ivjs. Fizani Husain, APP for the State/respondent No.l along with ASI Abbas Raza, P.S. Sultanpuri. Respondent No. 2 in person with Mr. Satish Rana, Advocate. +CrI.M.C. No.201/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.683/2006 initially registered under Section 341 and 308 IPG with the aid of Section 34 IPG on 12.01.2010 at P.S. Sultanpuri. The charge was again amended on 15.01.2011 and petitioners have been charged for the offences under Sections 341/307/506 read with Section 34 IPG. Reasons for seeking quashing .is that the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left between them. In support of this, the petitioners have placed on record the affidavit of respondent No.2 Farukh Shekh confirming that he has settled the matter in dispute with the petitioners. Petitioners are present in person. They are identified by their counsel Sh. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. Respondent No. 2 is also present. He is identified by his counsel Sh. Satish Rana, Advocate. Respondent No.2 confirms that he has signed the affidavit which is placed on record. He states that on the date of occurrence, while he was passing through the spot he noticed some quarrel going on. He intervened to stop the quarrel and someone stabbed him and he thought Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified that he was stabbed by the petitioners, so he named them in the FIR on suspicion. He states that now he has settled the matter with the petitioners of his own accord without any inducement or threat from any corner and there is no dispute left. Thus, he does not want any action on his complaint against the petitioners and he has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating from the same are quashed. Learned Ms. Fizani Husain, APR appearing for the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. State has no objection in case the FIR and the proceedings emanating from the same are quashed. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same alive. Accordingly, the FIR No.683/2006 P.S. Sultanpuri and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Petition stands disposed of. FEBRUARY 10, 2011 pst VW (AJIT BHARIHOKE)|, JUDGE