THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.145 OF 2011 DATED:12.07.2011 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order, dated 18.10.2010, in Crl.M.P.No.844 of 2010 in M.C.No.3 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBBC-cum- Additional Family Court-cum-XXIII Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad, wherein the said application filed by the 2nd respondent herein under Section 125 (1) Cr.P.C., was allowed granting interim maintenance of Rs.3000/- per month. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner herein and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent. None appears for the 2nd respondent though served with notice. Perused the records. 3. Petitioner herein is the husband of the 2nd respondent. 2nd respondent-wife filed M.C.No.3 of 2010 claiming maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month. She also filed M.P.No.844 of 2010 for interim maintenance at the same rate. According to the 2nd respondent, petitioner is working in a body building unit at Autonagar on a monthly salary of Rs.8000/-. Petitioner denies the same and pleads that he is not doing any job and he is working as an assistant to a Carpenter at his native village. The main case is pending. It is therefore considered neither just nor proper to go into the merits of the case regarding the assets and liabilities of the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, at this stage in the present proceedings. The learned Judge, Additional Family Court by the impugned order granted interim maintenance of Rs.3000/-per month. This Court while ordering notice before admission on 28.01.2011, granted interim stay on condition that the petitioner shall pay Rs.1500/- per month to the 2nd respondent before 10th of every month pending disposal of the main case by the learned Additional Judge, Family Court. It is considered that the petitioner be directed to pay at the same rate of Rs.1500/- per month as directed by this Court earlier. It is however open to the learned Judge, Additional Family Court to dispose of the main case on its own merits, without in any way being influenced by the interim order, dated 28.01.2011, passed by this Court, which is now made absolute. 4. In the result, Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 12th July, 2011. Tsy