..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3150 OF 2008 1. Balu @ Babu Kisan Mule, & 2. Shankar Dagdu Shirkande. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.S.S. Salunkhe, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 17th September, 2008. DATED : 17th September, 2008. DATED : 17th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.332 of 2008 of Mohol Police Station, Solapur. The said case is mainly under Sections 307, 326 of IPC. 3. Four persons were injured in the incident i.e. Dnyandeo, Sachin, Madhukar and Prabhakar. It is the prosecution case that the applicants ..(2).. along with other accused assaulted the injured persons. The co-accused have assaulted the injured persons with sword, iron bars and stones. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicants submitted that the role attributed to the present applicants is that they assaulted with kick blows and fist blows. He further submitted that no witnesses have stated that the applicants have assaulted on any vital part. Assuming this is so, it is seen that while the other co-accused were assaulting with dangerous weapons, the applicants have assaulted with kick blows and fist blows. The material on record prima facie shows that the applicants shared the common intention with the applicants. Looking to this fact and the injury certificates on record, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)