IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2010 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8749 of 2010(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SHYJIN, SHINE NIVAS, EZHUKONE.P.O., KOTTARAKAR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. MATHEWKUTTY, MARUTHUMPADY THEKKEKARA PUTHENVEEDU, EDAMULAKKAL.P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.MATHEW SUNNY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KOLLAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE SPECIAL SQUAD, KOLLAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.8749 OF 2010 (P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P1, the crime and occurrence report in CR.No.141/2009 of the Kollam Excise Range registered against the petitioners under Section 55(a) and 56(b) of the Kerala Abkari Act. In my view, if at all the petitioners want to challenge Ext.P1, the proper course available to the petitioners is to seek the remedy under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. For that reason, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. However, this judgment shall be without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to invoke their remedy under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/