IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.936 of 2007 CHANDRIKA PRASAD @ CHANDRIKA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2 22.10.2008 In the instant writ application, the petitioner prays for direction to the respondents for conducting an enquiry as to illegal appointment of respondent no.11 on the basis of forged document. The learned counsel for the railways submits that the appointment of respondent no.11 was made on 27.11.1988 as Ticket Collector at Muzaffarpur.He further submits that as per the certificate granted by Bihar School Examination Board, the date of birth of the petitioner was 10th of February,1978 but the petitioner had produced a forged document which shows his date of birth as 15th day of August,1981. However, If the petitioner feels aggrieved, he may ventilatilate his grievance by filing complaint before an appropriate authority. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of . Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)