IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.21454 of 2010 Date of Decision:8.11.2011 Jonginder Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus Haryana, Vidut, Prasaran, Nigam, Ltd. and others ... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned reply/letter dated 18.11.2010 (P- 6) being illegally and arbitrary as well as for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to pay the wages @ Rs.44 per hour to the petitioners as fixed by the Deputy Commissioner Kaithal from 1.3.2010 and not to deduct the amount on account of weekly rests and other recovery and release the entire wages together with interest @ 18% per annum. It is not disputed that the present case is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.22454 of 2010 decided on 27.7.2011 titled as Raj Pal and others vs. Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others as well as the order CWP No.21454 of 2010 -2- dated 13.9.2011 passed in the application bearing C.M. No.12240- CWP of 2011 modifying order dated 27.7.2011 to the extent that the words “Rs.44/- per day” shall be read as “Rs.44/- per hour”. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed in the same terms as in CWP No.22454 of 2010 decided on 27.7.2011 titled as Raj Pal and others vs. Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others as well as the order dated 13.9.2011 passed in the application bearing C.M. No.12240-CWP of 2011 modifying order dated 27.7.2011. 8.11.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE