IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49128 of 2008 FULO MIAN @ FULO NADAF, S/o late Maksud Mian Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 04.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, he was found an associate of Leela Nand Yadav, assailant of the deceased. Leela Nand Yadav appeared and faced trial but acquitted. So, petitioner’s custody for any more can not be justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. no.5, Purnea in connection with S.T. No. 848 of 2008 arising out of Banmankhi P.S. Case no. 94 of 1998. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)