IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 922 of 2011. Decided on 17th May, 2011. Karan Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That respondents may be ordered to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. August, 2007 with all the benefits incidental thereof such as pay fixation and seniority etc.” 2. There is no reply as yet. It is the case of the petitioner that Raj Bahadur and Subhadra Devi, who are similarly situated and who had approached this Court, have already obtained relief pursuant to direction issued by this Court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: 3. The petitioner may file an appropriate representation before the second respondent producing also the copy of the judgment in the case of Raj Bahadur and Subhadra Devi and 2 in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the persons referred to above, similar treatment shall be meted out to the petitioner herein also. The needful action in this regard shall be taken within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 17th May, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.