IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2234 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.98 OF 2003 IN ARTIBRATION PETITION NO.208 OF 2003 IN ARBITRATION CASE REF.NO.80 OF 2001 Surender Kumar Mahajan ....Appellant V/s. Tata Finance Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Atul Damle i/b Mr.N.G. Bhat for the Appellant. Mr.Y.R. Shah for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH JULY, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of delay. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)