IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11238 of 2009(Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.E.VISWANATHAN, S/O. VASUDEVAN (LATE), KANAL ROAD, ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY/REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, VATAKARA. R1 BY ADV.SRI.M.A.ASIF, GOVT. PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: an. V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 11238 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner operates a regular stage carriage on the route Kuttiadi-Kozhikode. Timings were originally settled in the year 2003. Petitioner has filed Exhibit-P1 seeking revision of timings citing certain subsequent events in this regard. I have gone through Exhibit-P1. In my view, respondent should consider whether the reasons stated in Exhibit-P1 request are sufficient to entertain an application for revision of timings in terms of Rule 145(7) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules and an order shall therefore be passed within two months specifically finding whether Exhibit-P1 application is maintainable in terms of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules. Such decision shall be taken after hearing the petitioner. If it is found to be maintainable then the request shall be posted before the next Timing Conference to be considered after notice to other objectors. The writ petition is dispose of as above. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3