IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13229 of 2006 MD.SHOAIB Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 29.7.2008. Having heard counsel for the petitioner as also counsel for the private Respondent No.4, I am of the view that this Court is not required to interfere with the order of the Collector, Madhubani dated 14.9.2006 passed in Mutation Revision Case No. 65 of 2005-06 as contained in Annexure-6 to this application, whereunder learned Collector has restored the Jamabandi of the lands in favour of private Respondent No. 4 as according to the Collector, those lands were earlier part of Jamabandi No. 1171, which was cancelled by passing order dated 28.3.1981, Annexure-1 without notice to private Respondent No.4. Counsel for the petitioner, however, assails such order on the basis of the memorandum of family partition dated 15.3.1980 as contained in Annexure-8 to the rejoinder affidavit, as such petitioner is at liberty to file civil suit in the civil court of competent jurisdiction for declaration of his title over the lands in question with reference to the memorandum of family partition dated 15.3.1980, Annexure-8. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)