IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2008 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12022 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- M/S.IDEA CULLULAR LTD FORMERLY M/S.IDEA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD, SECOND FLOOR, MERCY ESTATE, RAVIPURAM, COCHIN-682 015 REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER SRI.RAMACHANDRAN.C. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW RESPONDENT: ------------------- THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, OTHUKUMGAL. BY SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN – SC KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.4.2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL. B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.12022 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed an appeal against Ext.P3. If the petitioner pays 50% of the amount covered by Ext.P3 and re- connection charges, supply to the premises would be re- connected and the appeal of the petitioner will be entertained and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law and until then, there shall be no disconnection of the supply on account of the impugned bill. Any application of the petitioner for regularisation of additional load shall also be appropriately considered by the competent authority. Let that be done within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. THOTTATHIL. B. RADHAKRISHNAN , JUDGE Acd