IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2011 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 21740 of 2011(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. ANTONY, S/O. DEVASSY, KALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, PUTHIYEDAM KARA, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THOMAS, S/O. DEVASSY, KALAPARAMBIL HOUSE KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM. 3. JOSE, S/O. DEVASSY, KALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, ALUVA ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SMT.JEENA JOSEPH SRI.G.D.PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM PIN-682030. 2. KANJOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KANJOOR, PIN-683575. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SOUTH VELLARAPPILLY, LIFT IRRIGATION, KALADY, PIN-683574. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM ERNAKULAM DIST-683575. R1 & R4 BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.21740/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.654/1120. P2:- COPY OF THE SALE DEED 227/1961. P3:- COPY OF THE WILL DEED III/39. P4:- COPY OF THE BASIC TAX TAX REGISTER. P5:- COPY OF THE SKETCH OF THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND RECORDS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPERTY IN SURVEY AND RECORDS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPERTY IN SURVEY NO.58 OF THE KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE. P6:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DTD. 4.1.2011 P7:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE .S.I. OF POLICE KALADY, DTD. 19.7.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).21740/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 24th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT The issue raised in this writ petition pertains to the alleged demolition of a concrete wall for widening the road. When the matter was brought up for admission, this Court had taken the view that the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the Civil Court. Today it is submitted that, notice under Section 80 of the C.P.C has already been issued. In that view of the matter, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the said remedy, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs