IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4639 of 2008 Between: 1 Syed Ameer S/o.Syed Abbas R/o.Karuchola VillageEdlapadu Mandal, Guntur District. 2 Shaik Karimullah S/o.Shaik Adam Shafi R/o.3-53 A Karuchola Village, Edlapadu Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., rep. by its Collector, Guntur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 3 The Tahsildar (MRO) MRO Office Edlapadu, Edlapadu Mandal, Guntur District. 4 Karuchola Gram Panchayat rep. by its Sarpanch Syed Abdul Munaf S/o. Syed Bajed Karuchola Gram Panchayat, Guntur District. 5 Smt.Sk.Shakila Bi W/o.Subhani R/o. Karuchola Village, Edlapadu Mandal Guntur District. 6 Sri Jajula Kotaiah S/o.Tirupathaiah R/o. Karuchola Village, Edlapadu Mandal Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd & 4th respondents in not taking steps in implementing the orders of the 2nd respondent, dated 19.04.2006 and the endorsement made by the 1st respondent on the representation dated 22.2.2008, by taking steps of stopping the constructions over the land in Sy. Nos. 34, providing necessary assistance, to avoid law and order problem as being illegal, arbitrary, capricious, malafide and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. SYED SHAREEF AHMED Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. Nos. 4639 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that the land in question was allotted for the welfare of the Muslim community, and that respondent No.2 also vide orders dated 19.04.2006 directed respondent No.3 to make necessary entries in the revenue records. It is the case of the petitioner that he made representation dated 22.02.2008 requesting respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to implement the orders dated 19.04.2006 of respondent No.2, but no action thereon had been taken till date, and taking advantage of the non-entries, respondent Nos. 5 and 6, with the active assistance of respondent Nos. 3 and 4, are making construction in the land in question. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 on instructions received from respondent No.3 submitted that they are taking necessary steps for eviction of the encroachments in Sy. Nos. 34 and 35 made by respondent Nos. 5 and 6, and that he had already issued notices in Forms 6 and 7 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905, and that they are actively considering the representation of the petitioner for taking steps for removal of the encroachments. Inasmuch as respondent No.3 had already initiated action against respondent Nos. 5 and 6 by issuing notices in Forms 6 and 7 for removal of the encroachments, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, and in view of that, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 18th March, 2008. KSR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}