1 LPA 224.2011+CA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 224 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 780 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7775 OF 2011 IN LPA 224 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant ... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 18.07.2011 P.C.:- 1. The Appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge confirming the order passed by the trial Court. The trial Court had allowed the Application submitted on behalf of respondents 2A and 2B for production of the documents. The learned Single Judge has considered the submission of the learned Advocate for the appellant with respect to the Order 8 Rule 1- A of the Code of Civil Procedure which submission was advanced before us as well. 2. After perusing the order impugned, we do not find that there is any error committed by the learned Single Judge. The documents have been 2 LPA 224.2011+CA allowed to be produced considering the facts and circumstances in the case. Letters Patent Appeal dismissed. Consequently, Civil Application no. 7775 of 2011, seeking stay also stands dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]