IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2009 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1981 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRMP.1646/2009 of J.M.F.C.-I, PUNALUR CRIME NO. 108/2009 OF YEROOR POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2:- ------------------------------------ 1. CHANDRANANDAN, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. THANKACHAN, ANITHA BHAVAN, THINKALKARIKKAM MURI AND VILLAGE. 2. KRISHNANKUTTY, AGED 49, S/O. GOVINDAN, VISHNUVILASOM VEEDU, NEAR THEKKEVAYAL, YEROOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. MR. K.ABDUL JAWAD RESPONDENTS/ COMPLAINANTS:- ------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEROOR POLICE STATION. ADV. MR. K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ===================== B.A. No. 1981 of 2009 ===================== Dated, this the 8th day of April, 2009. ORDER Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 108 of 2009 of Yeroor Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 452, 324 and 326 r/w Section 34 IPC seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 20.03.2009. The petitioners were arrested on 30.03.2009. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 8th day of April, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv