IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS w.P. No. é\ OF 2000 IN THE MATTER OF: PETITIIONERS: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226(227 OF-THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS E ND/OR FOR CRTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC{ ETC. A l. M/S SHRI RANI SATI GRANITE COMPANY, a ?artnership firm duly registered under the relevant provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1'932, having its principal place of business near Gurudwara, Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhgttisgarh) 2. SHRI RAM GOPAL KHEDIA, aged 56 years, son of Late Shri Chunnilal Khedia, Partner M/S Shri Rani Sati Granite Company, . resident of Mandendragarh, District Korea, (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS n Through the Secretary to the Government of Chhattisgarh, Water Resources Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhavan, G.E.Road, »Raipur (Chhattisgarh) n 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, Hasdeo f Kachar, Water Resources Department BilasPur (Chhattisgarh) p> 3. THE'SNPERINTENDING ENGINEER, Watef Resources Division, Shyam Barnia Project Division Ambikapur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, Water Resource Division, Surajpur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) @M5. SHRI LAL BABU SINGH, A-S Category Contractor, Kedarpur, Ambikapur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) XI—HC-22 23.11.2001 : Shri Y.K.Munshi learned coumsel with Shri B.P.$harma fo'r The peTifioner's. Shri Pr-ashanf Mishm learne"; counse! for- respon§§nfno.5. Heard. by The pefh‘ioner- on The ground ’rha‘r ‘rherespondem‘ no.5 has been wrongly held fo be a dualified Tender-or- for' the consfrucfion Parashurampur- Tank. Counsel for‘fhe respondenvs l'fo 4 and also counsel for respondent no.5 on the ofher- hand submif That 1'hey fulfill all ‘The requiremenTs menTioned in The Tender. During The cour'se of argum anT counsel for The parTies have polnTed-ouT ThaT pursuan-T To The i has noT B‘een issUed buT The oTher- i / This pefition has been filed of Ief‘l‘ and righf flank of nTer'im dir-eCTion, The work order formaliTies have been oompleTed. we am XI~HC—22 mmmvfga mmw§wm éaamm :arTies for consideraTion in The nd speedy compleTion of work. via media. e| appearing for Thq‘beTiTioner i anT peTiTioner is concerned, he is which has been offered by The Via media is suggesfed by the W inter-est of revenue and progress a Heard all The parfies on fhis Shri Munshi iearned couns submiffed fhaf so far as the pres willing 1'0 work at The same rafe respondent no.5. Counsel for fhe responden’r fha’r his cliem‘ is further ready ' advam‘age of The revenue of The Si In view of The Tag conTenTi respecTive purTies, iT wiii be jusT The interesT of The revenue of The given by negoTiaTion. Such negoTia‘ made by Engineer-in—chief, WaTer ' \ChhaTTisgarh. \\ 10.5 on The oTher hand submiTTed To lower down The raTe for The 'aTe. ; ons raised by The counsel for The and proper and also desirable in STaTe ThaT The conTracT may be rion as agreed by The parTies, be Resources DeparTmenT, STaTe of \\\ \ {foam Jr , XI—HC—22 . ’“‘ Judge y "qr ., ,f F/Jm , , Sdl- L x Chief Justice f, . > b”‘_w,_