IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8669 of 2008 Decided on: 10.08.2010 A.D. Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioner has assailed the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Head of Department in the subject of Pharmacy. However, fact of the matter is that during the pendency of the petition, petitioner has been duly considered for the post of Head of Department in the subject of Chemistry. But, he has not been found suitable on some administrative grounds. The petitioner has also filed separate petition that his case for the post of Head of Department in the subject of Chemistry has not been considered in accordance 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- with law. Now, since the petitioner has been considered for the post of Head of Department in the subject of Chemistry, the petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 10, 2010 (K. Attri)