*1* chs.496.10 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.496 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.819 OF 2009 Union of India. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Fatemabai Binte Nakhoda Mohd. Amin Rogay Religious and Charitable Trust and others. ..Defendants -And- Mohamed Sayeed Mahomed Hasan and others. ..Respondents. .......... P.Mani, Bajpai i/b Dhiren H. Shah, for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants and Respondents. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 26th November, 2010. P.C. 1 The affidavit in support discloses as to how the Plaintiffs are required to move this Chamber Summons. They are required to substitute the original Defendant Nos.2 and 3 with the Respondents because the Defendant No.2 has retired from the trusteeship of the Defendant No.1 trust and the Defendant No.3 was only an employee of the Trust. Thus, the Plaintiffs are seeking to substitute the Respondents in place of the Defendant Nos.2 and 3. The Chamber Summons is duly served on the Defendants, so also, the proposed Defendants. None appears to oppose the request made by the Plaintiffs. There are no reply affidavits filed either. 2 The Chamber Summons is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)