:1: chandka IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1687 OF 2007 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1687 OF 2007 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1687 OF 2007 Sujata Anandan & Ors. ..Petitioners versus Narayan Tatu Rane & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Amit Desai with Mr. Rajeev Pandey i/b. PRS Legal for the Petitioners. Mr. A. S. Shitole, APP for the Respondents - State. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard Mr. Amit Desai, the learned counsel for the petitioners, who are aggrieved by the order of issuance of process by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class at Kankavli, District Sindhudurg, on 8.6.2007, in Criminal Case No. 384 of 2006, which is filed for offences punishable under Sections 499 and 500 of I.P.C. 2. It is clear that the petitioners have an :2: chandka alternative and equally efficacious remedy of filing Criminal Revision Application before the Sessions Court and therefore the Petition is disposed of with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. 3. If such a Revision Application is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the petitioners are exempted from their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class at Kankavli, District : Sindhudurg, until the Revision Application is decided, provided the Petitioners are represented by an Advocate before the said Court. The Revision Application to be decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within two months from the date of filing. (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)