HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY C.C.Nos.564 and 902 of 2011 Date: October 13, 2011 Between: M/s.Sree Chakradhari Nagar Welfare Association, rep. by its Secretary M.Bhaskar Reddy and another … Petitioners And Smt.M.Vanaja Devi, Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar Mandal, KPHB Colony, R.R.District, Hyderabad and others … Respondents Order: Willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in complying the order dated 04.03.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.No.5165 of 2011 is the complaint in these contempt cases filed under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For the purpose of disposal of these cases, I refer to the parties as arrayed in C.C.No.564 of 2011. The petitioner herein filed W.P.No.5165 of 2011 alleging that the 7th respondent therein is illegally manufacturing aqua mineral water by digging bore-wells without permission from the competent authorities. The case of the petitioner was that in spite of filing representations on 01.11.2009 and 15.05.2010, no action has been taken by the authorities. In view of the said representations of the petitioner, this Court, by order dated 04.03.2011 directed the Mandal Revenue Officer to consider the representations of the petitioner filed against the 7th respondent therein and initiate appropriate action thereon. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that despite such directions of this court, no action has been taken by the respondent-contemnor. The Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Serilingmaplly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, has filed counter-affidavit stating that on 05.05.2011, after receipt of the orders of this court, the aqua mineral plant of the 7th respondent in the writ petition was inspected and the illegal structure raised by it was demolished, but due to the interim orders of this Court in W.P.No.6139 of 2011 no steps were taken to disconnect power supply. C.C.No.902 of 2011 is filed by the 7th respondent in the writ petition alleging that the authorities illegally demolished the sheds and compound wall raised by it. Though it is the allegation of the petitioner in C.C.No.564 of 2011 that the order of this court dated 04.03.2011 has not been implemented, in view of the steps taken by the respondents-authorities by demolishing the illegal structures made by the 7th respondent for manufacture of mineral water, it cannot be said that no action has been taken in pursuance of the directions of this Court. As much as it is stated that the 7th respondent has filed W.P.No.6139 of 2011 and obtained interim orders, power supply was not disconnected. Even in C.C.No.902 of 2011 filed by the 7th respondent, I do not find any merit as much as steps taken by the respondents are pursuant to the orders of this court wherein this court directed the authorities to consider the application of the petitioner-association. Further, the petitioner in C.C.No.902 of 2011 has already filed a writ petition questioning the action of the respondents-authorities in demolishing the structures raised by it. Therefore, no relief can be granted in C.C.No.902 of 2011 also. For the aforesaid reasons, both the contempt cases are liable to be dismissed and are accordingly dismissed. _____________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY, J) October 13, 2011 MRR