IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13848 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 06, 2010. Nachhatar Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Mohd.Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges threat to his life and liberty at the hands of the private respondent Nos.4 to 7, allegedly in connivance with the respondent-police authorities. From the averments made in the writ petition, it is apparent that there is a serious dispute with regard to possessory rights over the land measuring 5 bighas and 5 biswas which was earlier owned by Ms.Sandeep Kaur, a close relation of the private respondents. The petitioner is said to have purchased the said land for a consideration by way of a registered sale deed (Annexure P-1). I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and perused the documents on record. Keeping in view the fact that such C.W.P.No .13848 of 2010 2 like disputed questions can not be resolved in exercise of the writ jurisdiction of this Court but also to ensure that the parties do not involve in anti-social activities in order to grab possession from each other, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to take cognizance of the complaints, if any, received from both the sides and take appropriate action within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is clarified that this direction shall not be taken as an expression of views against any of the parties and the matter shall be enquired into by the authority in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE