1 ABA 953 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.953 OF 2011 Amar Sudhakar Patil .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. M. S. Mohite, for the applicant. Mrs. V. R. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 24th November, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person who alongwith 30 to 40 others, is alleged to have been involved in the attack on the first informant. Even according to first informant the applicant was not armed with any weapon. The injuries sustained by the first informant are all simple though the police have registered an offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of assault attributed to the applicant as also the fact that co accused Tejas Patil who was also named in the F.I.R. alongwith applicant was arrested and has been bailed out, the applicant’s being in custody for the purpose of investigation is not necessary. Therefore, in the event of applicant's arrest, in C.R.No.I-360 of 2010, registered at Manikpur Police Station, Vasai, Dist, Thane, he be released on 2 ABA 953 OF 2011 bail on his furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs. 25,000/- on the following conditions : i) The applicant shall make himself available on 28th November, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone number and address and other details to the investigating officer. iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, reported in A.I. R. 2011 (SC) 312. 3 ABA 953 OF 2011 vi) The application stands disposed of . (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)