IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16935 of 2008 R.S.Yadav @ Rajeshwar Yadav, Army No. 14902812Y Ex Hav Son of Late Madhu Ram Yadav, Resident of Village – Biraul, P.O. – Biraul, P.S. – Khajauli, District – Madhubani (Bihar). ------ Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Defence Secretary, New Delhi. 2. The Chief of the Army Staff Army H.Q., Defence H.Q., New Delhi. 3. The Record Officer, Records the Mech Inf Regt. Pin – 900476 , c/o 56 APO. 4. The Officer Incharge C.D.A. (P) Allahabad (U.P.) ----- Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 07.12.2011 Heard Sri Fulman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar Pandey, learned Central Government Counsel, appearing on behalf of Respondents. It was submitted by learned counsel for the Respondent/Union of India that the present petition involves disability pension relating to Army personnel and as such the writ petition is not maintainable before this court in view of Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act. Accordingly, in view of Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, the office is required to transmit the record of the case to the Armed Forces Tribunal situated at Calcutta, West Bengal, without any delay. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)