IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR mm" PEHTIQN N0.a??8~¥7'200 1' Agedulii; O-Magarpara,Bilaspur, DisnBiféspurmm PETITIONERS: - Smt. Shatétfagalia W/o- Late KuIdeepSingh VERSUS RESPONDENTS: — LUm'eg Qflndia Through-Home Secretary, New Delhi 2. State of Chhattisgarh. Through-Secretary Home, General Admiiiistration Dept. DK. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Commisssioner, BilaspudCGJ 4. Coiiecmr, Biiagpmém rit ' etition under art.2 /227 of the canstitution, of ndia for issuance of a suiiahi’e writ orders ,or'direciie The above named getiti'oner most humbly and es ectfull ’ be s to submit the, etitinn under - ”Mw a... W 2 f n. r : . XI-HCv22 @9 WW,W€,W Wm . , .W-V NCA 21% WW W 2001 mmmm WW T€€TW %W37I%¥I r\‘w- v 23.4.2002 Dr. NK. Shukla, Ad‘ $anjay K‘ Agrawal, for thé‘ Dr.NK Shukla‘ sub] paid to the petitionCr and order pagsad by this Cour t, a sum of Rs.2,99,063/— has been 7‘ paid. Counsel for th€ pew tioner submits that pursuant to the deciSion rendered by the Jpelhi High Court in Civil Writ (Bhajan Kaur —V— Delhi Petition N0. 1429 of 1996 Administration) which hat been V reported in 1996(38) DRJ, the petitioner is entitled t; 3 certain other reliefs. Counsei for the Stat e submite that so far ae the present petitioner is concerned, 1111:) special relief lias‘ been \‘Having thus considered the facte and Circnmstances of ' the case and material on record; so far as this aSpect is concerned, petitioner may make representation before the \\ m / // ‘ / \ \ VW®W \ \ tounsel for the Petitioner. Shri VC. Ottalwar, til. Advocate Generai with Shri F State/ respondents? :nits that earlier Rs.SOOOO/ - was subsequently pursuant to the XI~HC-22 Wam fs€tm $3TWW€$I competent authority and then the competent autho rity shall decide the Same rand pass ‘ reasoned orders Within with law. So far aS the math in case such representation is filed ‘ months thereafter, in accordance are/cases of State of Chhattisgarh relating to Anti—Sikh Riots are concerned which are pending with the Sta “dealt with by the State a5 reported in 2001 (4) SCC 452 (S .S. Ahluwalia —V- Union of wow“; W Ind1a)(as expedltloualv as observations aforesaid. Cohrb M OM Certified Photocopy be supplied. ‘ . ’ a? .tr 3m CW (twink Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge t 1,“, wig V ’[wtaw to, it is; directed that they shall be p‘er decision of the Supreme Court poss1ble “3*3‘his petition is dlsposed MW» CM of Qt subJect OW ”h to the dlrections/