CJf izn^- ^ L BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^.^6^ /2010 PETTTTONER / RESPON&ENTS ^ ^ 4^ ^ ,-A ,»•^ </ Mukesh Saxena, S/o. Ramesh Saxena, Aged about 37 years, R/o. Sai Nagar, Behind Hotel Siriraj, Jail Road, Raipur (C.6.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, &.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No.2, Raipur (C.6.) The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No.2, Raipur (C.6.) The Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Construction, Sub Division No.l, Raipur (C.G.) WRFT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTU'nON OF INDIA / 3. 4. HLGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR W,_P^(Q No._2766 of 2010 Petitioner Mukesh Saxena Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION_QP INDIA DB: Hon'ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'ble Mr. Prashaut Kumar Mishra, JJ. SIiri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. o?; O RD E R (Otall ( Passed on this 18th day ofJime, 2010) Pes I. M. Quddusi, J. Heard learued counsel appeadng for the \wiit petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents/State. By ineans of this petition the writ petitioner prays tbr a direction to the respondents to pay the bills in respect of the work conipleted by the petitioner pursuant to the work oider issued by fhe respondents. For the above purpose the petitioner should inove a representatiou before the authorities concerned and iu case such a represeutation is inade, fhe dues admitted by the authorities should be paid, as early as possible. With the above direction tliis petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. . ' ~- 4. Sdl- iM.Quddusi judge Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Tbakm-