cwy (SK HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (81 No, 6596 pf 2007 PETITIONERS ^ ».- 1 Smt, Nishat Ahamed, Aged 45 years W/o Shri Iqbal Ahamed, Upper Division Teacher, Chaadra Shekher Azad High.er Secondary School, Dui^ Tahsil aad District DurgfC.G.) 2 Smt. Savita Gupta, Aged 47 years W/o Shri Rajkuaiar Gupta, Upper Division Teacher, Chaadra Shekher Azad Higher Secondary School, Durg Tahsil aad District Durg (C.G.) 3 Smt. Surekha Swamkar, Aged 47 years W/o Shri S. Swanikar, Upper Division. Teacher, Mahatina Gandhi Hjgher Secondary, School, Dui^ TahsU aad District Durg (C.G.) 4 Smt. Kavita Shrivastava, Aged 45 years W/o Shri Raia Krishna Shrivastava, Upper Division Teacher, Mahatma Gandhi Higher Secondaiy School, Durg Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) ycrsas 1 The State Govenuaent of Chliattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Muiucipal Corporation, Dvsf (C.G.) Through:- Commissioaer Municipal Corporation Durg (C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UKDER ARTICLB 226 QF TliB CON8TITUTION OF RESPONDENTS Appearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, coi.tasel for fhe petitioners. Shri Pradeep Siagh, Paael Lawyer for fbe State on. advaace copy. :^a s ^S^BaiBBB W.P.(S)No. 6596/2007 \.' ^- ORAL ORDBR (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioners subinits fhat the petitioners have passed B.Ed. examiaation on their own expenses, fherefore, they are entitled to receive two advaace iacreiaents accordiag to circulais dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical inatters, the petitions have been ailowed iu tenas of the order passed in the case of Yctshwewt Kunuv Bhtirad.weii Vs. Municlpcd Corooratfon, Durg a.nst anwther {2006 IJS MPJR-CG 96?. He submits that fhe case of fhe petitioners is squarely covered by fhe said judgnient. This legal position is not disputed by fhe leanied counsel for fhe State. However, he subinits that ftie order inay be passed ia tenns of fhe said judgnient, but it shall be subjected to verification regardiaj petitioners' such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is aBowed in term.s of fhe order passed in. case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and arwther (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher fhe petitioliers had acquired B.Ed. Examioation Certificate on fheir own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 and further whether they bave been paid two advance iacrements or not. The petition stauds finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatfci I-