IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.40312 of 2009 DOMI YADAV, S/o Sri Jagadish Yadav @ Jagadish Jadar, R/o Village – Nidhama, P.S. Ghoghardiha, Distt. – Madhubani ….. ………………………………………………….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………………... Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- M/s Birendra Pd. Verma, Sr. Advocate with Ram Naresh Roy, Yogendra Kumar, M.K. Gautam and Manish Kumar, Advocates. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 23.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This is a case of misuse of the privilege of bail. As the petitioner was not being represented since 17.01.2003, his bail bonds had been cancelled on 16.08.2005 and he was arrested on 19.03.2009. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner had gone outside the State to earn his livelihood and due to communication gap with his Pairvikar, he could not remain present as the dates fixed in his case were not to his knowledge. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, Domi Yadav to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J. (F.T.C. II), Madhubani in 2 Phulparas P.s. Case No. 167 of 1994, dated 10.07.1994, G.R. No. 700/94, giving rise to S.T. No. 402 of 1998, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. It is further directed that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial save and except his presence is dispensed with by the court concerned in accordance with law, failing which the trial court concerned shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )