IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2010 / 5TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2331 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BAISIL ATTEPETTY @ BASIL A.G, AGED 52 YEARS,S/O.GEORGE,ATTIPETTY,ATTIPETTY HOUSE NAYARAMBALAM.P.O,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BAISIL ATTIPETTY (PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KALADY REPRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. THE SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT KALADY,REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. SRI.C.V.ASOKAN,HIGHER GRADE SECTION OFFICER,ADMINISTRATION WING,SSUS,KALADY. 4. SRI.T.CHANDRA BABU,HIGHER GRADE SECTION OFFICER,VICE CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE,SSUS,KALADY. BY G.P. SRI. K.J. MOHAMMED ANSAR BY ADV. SRI.P.K. VIJAYAMOHAN - SC FOR R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 2331 of 2010-N ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT Basant,J. The short prayer of the petitioner is that he may be permitted to be present before the University on 27/1/10 in obedience to the directions of the learned single Judge in Ext.P1 interim order dated 20/1/10. The operative part of Ext.P1 order reads like this: “The petitioner shall be present before the University on 27/1/2010. On that day, the University shall get all required papers signed by the petitioner and relieve him on that day itself.” 2. The petitioner apprehends that respondents 3 and 4 might obstruct him from proceeding to the University in W.P.(C) No. 2331 of 2010 -: 2 :- pursuance of the directions issued in Ext.P1. This would virtually deprive him of the advantage of Ext.P1 order. According to him, he has already submitted Ext.P2 representation to the 1st respondent. The petitioner apprehends that respondents 3 and 4, being very powerful persons, may frustrate his option to proceed to the University on 27/1/10 to claim the advantage of Ext.P1 order. 3. Notice has been given. The learned Government Pleader appears for the 1st respondent. The Standing Counsel for the University appears for the 2nd respondent. The Standing Counsel submits that the University has no objection against the petitioner coming to the University in compliance with Ext.P1 order and claiming the benefits of the said order. The learned Standing Counsel for the University, however, submits that the petitioner will have to comply with the directions in Ext.P1 fully i.e., he will have to execute a bond and sign all required papers. 4. Respondents 3 and 4 have not been served. There is hardly time to wait for issue and return of notice to respondents 3 and 4. The directions in Ext.P1 have to be complied with and the petitioner has got to be given opportunity to appear before the University as directed in Ext.P1 order. In these circumstances, we deem it only proper to direct the 1st W.P.(C) No. 2331 of 2010 -: 3 :- respondent to ensure that the petitioner is given opportunity and the required assistance to appear before the University in compliance of Ext.P1 order. Necessary assistance/protection shall be granted to the petitioner by the 1st respondent. 5. This writ petition is thus allowed in part. We think that in this petition for police protection it is unnecessary to consider the various other contentions raised and reliefs claimed. 6. Hand over a copy of this judgment to the learned Government Pleader who shall immediately communicate the same to the 1st respondent. Hand over another copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner also. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI (Judge) Nan/ //True Copy// P.S. to Judge