HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.20430 of 2010 Date: August 20, 2010 Between: Uppala Srinivas Rao, S/o. late Anjaneyulu, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Sarpanch, Perecherla Gram Panchayath, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur District … Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. through District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District, And another … Respondents Order: The petitioner, Sarpanch of Perecherla Gram Panchayath, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur District, has filed this writ petition questioning show cause notice dated 03-08-2010 issued to him by the second respondent- District Panchayath Officer, Guntur in ROC No.325/2010- G7. By the aforesaid proceedings, while calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why he should not be prohibited from operating the accounts of the Gram Panchayath funds; by way of an interim order, pending passing of final order, he was prohibited from drawing general funds, SFC, 12th Finance Commission Funds and SGRY and other funds lodged in Sub-Treasury and banks concerned. It is the case of the petitioner that in spite of his submitting explanation to the impugned show-cause notice on 07-08-2010, no final orders have been passed. It is his case that the allegations levelled against him are false and baseless. The impugned proceedings is only a show-cause notice pending passing of final order under Rule 42 of the Rules framed under G.O.Ms.No.30, PR & RD and Relief (PTS III) Department, dated 20-01-1995. By the impugned proceedings, interim order was passed prohibiting the petitioner from withdrawing funds. With regard to the allegations made in the impugned proceedings, when the petitioner has filed explanation dated 07-08-2010, at this stage, this court cannot record any finding whether the said allegations are true or not and it is for the respondents to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. As much as the petitioner has already filed his explanation to the impugned show-cause notice on 07-08- 2010, I dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent to consider the said explanation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) August 20, 2010 MRR