IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20683 of 2011 Sinkoo Kumar @ Roshan Kumar, Son of Naresh Yadav @ Anil Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village Jadupatti, P.S. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party ------------------ 03/- 09/09/2011 Heard Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Damodar Pd. Tiwary learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 353, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 4, 5, 6 of the B.C.E. Act 1981, is one of the named accused in this case with allegation of preparing answers of the question of matriculation examination for sale during examination period. Submission is that petitioner has no concern with co- accused Pourush Kumar and except disclosure of his name in extra judicial confession of two apprehended accused persons, there is nothing emerged against him during investigation, rather he was in duty in a school, where he is employed which is at substantial distance from the said place of occurrence. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor in spite of being armed with case diary could not be able to point out anything otherwise specifically against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 143 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)