IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1458 of 2006 ALI IMAM IDRISHI Versus MOKHTAR MIYAN & ORS ----------- 3 04.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the Court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in refusing the prayer of the petitioner for making the two suits analogous. Once the Court below has arrived at a finding in the impugned order that not only reliefs in the two suits, sought to be made analogous, are different and distinct but also the subsequent suit is at an infancy stage, it had hardly any option to pass an order for making the two suits analogous. Before this Court too, the counsel for the petitioner could not successfully dislodge either of the aforesaid two findings. Consequently there is no escape for the petitioner from the result of a wholly misconceived prayer based on admitted facts and reasons recorded in the impugned order. This Court therefore has also no option but to accord its approval and affirm the impugned order. That being so, this Civil Revision application is wholly misconceived and is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) - 2 -