WPMS No.231/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln. No.5089/10) (Substitution Appln. No.5090/10) Mohd. Azim, Adv. i/b Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Adv. for the applicants/petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State/respondents 1 and 2. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Adv. for respondent no.3. For the reasons stated, delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. Also perused the substitution application supported by an affidavit. For the reasons stated therein, the substitution application is also allowed. Let the necessary substitution be incorporated, as prayed in paragraph 8 of the affidavit, filed in support of the substitution application. Counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply the amended memo of parties within three days. Thereafter, the notices be issued to the newly substituted respondents returnable within three weeks. List thereafter. (D.V., J.) 01.07.2010 Rajeev Dang