WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF Tim OONSTITUTION OF mgm ' PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF (5HHATTI&ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 2 NO. 2977 2008 Prasotam Ram Gond S/o Devnandan Ram aged about 3O ‘ yeaJ’s, Saxpanch of Gran; Panchayat Pathkpur, R/o Villagc Pathkpur, Pcst— Kalyanlpur, Tahsil Surajpur, District- Sarg‘uja, C.G. . Versus RESPONDENTs 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Ambikapur, Distn‘ct Sarguja (CG) 3. Sub-Di‘visional O$cer, Sumjpur, Dishict— Sarguj (CG) Gram Panchayat Pathkpur, Tahsil , Distict Sarguja, CG. Rajwadc, S/o Bahal Ram Rajwade, ut 32 yeam S/o. Lata Mahto Gond, aged about 40 ', 7. Dasna Singh, S/o Late Manglu Ram Gond, aged a out 52 ycars 8. Dhane hwa: Prasad, S/o Ganesh Piasad Bramhan, aged about 35 years 9. Nand Kumar, S/o Mohan Lal Gond, aged about 3O yams 10. Rameshwar, So Lodhi Gond, aged about 40 . years 1 1. Budhrem, S/o Adhnu Ram Gond, aged about 40 years dents No.5 to 11 ale R/o Village , Post‘Kab’aJipur, Tahsil Smajpur, Distn'c Sarguja, (LG. o / O RAL 0 R D E R 11-06—2008 Dhirendra Misha, J. Mr. R.K. Jain, counsel f( ur the petitioner. ' Mr. Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State. Heaxd on LA. Nos.1 8n urgent hearing, mspsch'vely. Applications are allowed. This petition is dime d against the oxder of Sub-Divisional petitioner has been removed hom the )n 40 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj 3, applications for vacation hearing 85 O$cer, Surajpur, whereby post of Saxpanch under Secth Adhinivam, 1993. d Govt. Advocate appealing on behalf of Mr. Alok Bakshi, learn the State submits that the o er under Section 40 of the Sub Divisional under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj Odicer is an appealable orde Adhinivam, 1993. Learned counsel for t] permitted to withdraw this accordance with law. The prayer is allowed. ’I‘] petition with liberty, as prayedl for. 1e petitioner submits that he may be petition with liberty to iile appeal in 1e petitioner is permitted to Withdraw this [143%W Learned counsel for the pctiu'oner furtherprays that cerhEad copy of the impugned order may be leturncd to him. O$ce is directed to return copy of the impugned order to the” petitioner on his furnishing authenticated true copy of the same. Sd/- i Dhirendra Mishra ‘ ' Judge‘ 4 Ce: tilied copy as per rules. [113%W