1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3528 OF 2001. (Manoj Shambhudatta Ratan and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 13, 2011. Heard Shri Madkholkar, learned Advocate for the petitioner, Shri G.G. Mishra, learned Advocate for the Zilla Parishad, Akola and Zilla Parishad, Washim and Shri V.A. Thakare, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1. After hearing we find that except for petitioner no.11 - Murlidhar Shrikrishna Jadhav and petitioner no.16 - Dinkar Pandurang Tambade, all other petitioners have been absorbed in Zilla Parishad, Akola and therefore, their grievance stands redressed. Shri Mishra, learned Advocate clearly states that if, appropriate proposal showing willingness of petitioner nos.11 and 16 is sent by 2 Zilla Parishad, Washim, Zilla Parishad, Akola will take decision on it and absorb those petitioners also. In view of this fair statement made, we direct Zilla Parishad, Washim to forward necessary proposal in respect of petitioner nos.11 and 16 to Zilla Parishad, Akola within a period of four weeks from today and said Zilla Parishad, Akola shall thereafter considered it and arrange to absorb those petitioners in its employment in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks. With this direction Writ Petition is partly allowed by making rule made absolute accordingly. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE NSN