IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19978 of 2011 Md. Zabed Hussain Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 03/- 28/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. It is also pointed out that one case under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was also going on between the parties, wherein, Rs. 800/- per month was ordered to be paid by way of interim maintenance to the complainant by the petitioner. Submission is that, the said amount is being continuously paid to the complainant, but learned counsel for the complainant refuted such submission as regard to payment. Further, submission is that, said case under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has already been disposed of and a sum of Rs. 3,000/- per month has been awarded as maintenance to be paid against which petitioner has preferred revision. Considering the facts and circumstances and nature of allegation, in the event of producing proof of payment of interim maintenance of Rs. 800/- per month as ordered or in case of non- payment, payment of entire dues at above rate with further undertaking to continue payment of said amount, subject to any order on the point by the competent court, in the event of his 2 arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Zabed Hussain, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Complaint Case No. 958C of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)