IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1929 RP.No. 998 of 2007() ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22075/2007 Dated 17/09/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITONER: ---------------------------------------- V. MAHESHKUMAR, PRINCIPAL, SREENIKETHAN COLLEGE, KARAMCODE P.O., CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------ 1. PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, JALANDHAR, PUNJAB-144001. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, JALANDHAR, PUNJAB-144001. 3. VICE CHANCELLOR, PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, JALANDHAR, PUNJAB-144001. 4. THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.S. KRISHNAMOORTHY, SC FOR UGC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P.No.998 of 2007 IN W.P.(C) NO. 22075 OF 2007 (C) ===================== Dated this the 16th day of November, 2007 O R D E R After the disposal of this writ petition by judgment dated 17th September, 2007, this review petition has been filed mainly complaining that the reasons for cancellation of the examination made mention of in the judgment, was not conveyed to the petitioner. This submission is strongly refuted by the counsel for respondents 1 to 3, who also points out that all the students have taken supplementary examination and therefore the petitioner cannot plead ignorance of the cancellation of examinations held in March, 2006. 2. Be that as it may, in view of the persistent complaint of the petitioner that he was not intimated of the reasons of the cancellation of the examination, I direct that the respondents 1 to 3 shall convey to the petitioner the reasons for cancellation of the examination, which was held in March, 2006. This the respondents shall do within four weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp