IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9247 of 2009 SRI TEJ BAHADUR SINGH, son of Late Suraj Dayal Singh, resident of Village Etwah, Police Station Shahpur, District Bhojpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Department of Planning and Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Directorate of Statistical and Evaluation, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Sasaram. 5. The State of Jharkhand through the Director, State Provident Fund Directorate, Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Giridih, Jharkhand. 7. The Joint Director, Directorate of Statistical and Evaluation, Government of Bihar, Patna. 8. The District Statistical Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram, Bihar. 9. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ----Respondents ----------- 2. 5.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr N.N. Ojha, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.5 and 6 as also the learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application. According to the petitioner, some of the dues are to be settled by the State of Jharkhand and rest by the State of Bihar. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.5 and 6 submits that in case the petitioner files a representation before respondent no.5, the same would be considered in accordance with law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claims of the petitioner, the petitioner proposes to file separate representation before the Director, Directorate of Statistical and Evaluation, Government of Bihar, Patna (Respondent no.3) and the State of Jharkhand through the Director, State Provident Fund Directorate, Ranchi, Jharkhand (respondent no.5) for redressal of the respective claims. In case such representations are filed stating the specific claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of his claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the above respondents shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the admitted dues of the petitioner could be paid without delay. The claim, if any, found not admissible, the same should be communicated to the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)