IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13515 of 2009 ANKESH KUMAR @ ANKY,SON OF BINOD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DIGHI, POLICE STATION MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT MADHEPURA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 09.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that only on the basis of the confessional statement of co- accused, the petitioner’s name has been roped in in this case. It is also stated that no test identification parade has been held and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. After going through the case diary, learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner was remanded in another case, namely, Murliganj P.S. case No.33/08 on the day he was arrested in this case and except this, there is nothing in the case diary to show that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in that case the petitioner has already been granted bail. - 2 - Considering the above facts and circumstances, petitioner (Ankesh Kumar @ Anky) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court I, Madhepura in Sessions Trial No.182 of 2008 arising out of Murliganj Police Station Case No.34 of 2008. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)