IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2918 of 1997 and SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2894 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MANJULABEN SHANKERLAL JOSHI Versus JAHANGIR TEXTILE MILL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MS DR KACHHAVAH for Petitioners in both petitions MS SONAL D VYAS for Petitioners RULE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1 MR BR GUPTA for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KSHITIJ R.VYAS Date of decision: 08/05/2003 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT Learned Counsel Ms.Kachhavah appearing for the petitioners, states that in affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.2, it is stated that the petitioners have approached the Controlling Authority (Central) for claiming the Gratuity and therefore, these petitions have become infructuous. In view of this, both these petitions stand dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. No costs. (Kshitij R. Vyas, J.) Sreeram.