IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2011 / 28TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 12503 of 2011(K) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K.P.KAMMU,S/O.MOHAMMED,AGED 58 YEARS, KOLATUIL PAYYANA POTTA HOUSE,P.O AZHINJILAM, MALAPPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.NIRMAL. S, SRI.P.P.RAVOOF. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. VAZHAYUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.O KAROD, VIA., FAROOK COLLEGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 679 322. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAYUR VILLAGE, KAKKOV P.O, VIA., RAMANATTUKARA,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 322. 3. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,KRISHI BHAVAN VAZHAYUR, P.O VAZHAYUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 679 322. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,P.O CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM - 679 322. 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. R2 TO 5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.12503/2011-K: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO. 1324/I/09. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE DATA BANK PUBLISHED BY THE RESPONDENTS. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE R.3. DTD. 04/10/2010. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DT. 19/01/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE LAND REVENUE DT. 08/02/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 12503 of 2011 K ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner seeks to quash Ext.P2 to the extent his property has been shown as wet land. He has also filed Exts.P4 and P5 representations before the 4th and 5th respondents respectively, seeking re-classification of his property. 2. When the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a direction to consider Ext.P4 representation pending before the fourth respondent. 3. I heard the learned Government Pleader also for the respondents. 4. Having regard to the nature of the grievance of the petitioner, I feel that it is a matter for the fourth respondent to consider and, therefore, I direct that the fourth respondent shall deal with Ext.P4 representation, as W.P.(C) No.12503/2011 : 2 : expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/20/10 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge