IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14793 of 2011 Arjun Yadav Versus Gaindu Yadav ----------- 02. 09.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the defendant- petitioner against the order dated 02.02.2011 passed by Sub Judge IV, Gaya in Partition Suit No.13 of 2010/62 of 2010 whereby the learned Court below allowed the amendment of the plaint. Admittedly, the trial has not started in the suit and, therefore, there is no question of prejudice caused to the defendant arises. The learned Court below found that by amendment, the nature of the suit will not change and that no irreparable loss is caused to the defendant. It is well settled principles of law that the Court has unfettered jurisdiction to allow the amendments which are pre-trial. I, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)