IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26073 of 2008 Between: M/s. Jayadarshini Housing Pvt. Limited, Rep. by Managing Director Mr.G.Saibabu S/o.G.V.Anjaneyulu having office at Road No.62, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahsildar, Medchal Mandal, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ order or direction by declaring the action of respondents in trying to dispossesses the petitioners from the lands in Sy.No. 24, 25 and 28 of Shajadiguda village and Sy.No. 733/B, 733/C of Ravalkole Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass such orders or order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.V.ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26073 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner purchased land comprised in survey Nos.24 (Acs.1.16 gts), 25 (Acs.2.30) and 28 (Acs.1.11) situated at Shazadiguda Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, from M/s. A.Padma, R.Venkataiah and R.Lingaiah respectively under unregistered sale deeds. The petitioner is allegedly in possession of the land. First respondent initiated action under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, and issued notice to the petitioner to show cause as to why the land should not be resumed. The petitioner submitted explanation on 15.10.2008. The enquiry is still pending. The writ petition is filed alleging that on 25.11.2008 revenue officials came to the land and tried to dispossess the petitioner. At the stage of admission itself, learned Assistant Government Pleader (Telangana Area) obtained instructions from the respondents. He submits that the allegation that on 25.11.2008 revenue officials tried to interfere and dispossess the petitioner is not correct. He, however, does not dispute that the matter is pending before first respondent. Therefore, first respondent may dispose of the matter immediately after giving opportunity to the petitioner. With the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 28th November, 2008 GHN To 1 The Tahsildar, Medchal Mandal, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Inspector, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 2CCs to GP for Revenue 4 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}