IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18467 of 2010 BIRENDRA LAL DAS, son of Late Surajnarain Lal Das, resident of Village-Bauraha, P.S. Karzain Bazar, District-Supaul. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Director, Panchayati Raj-cum-Joint Secretary, Village Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Director, Panchayati Raj (HQ), Directorate of Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Supaul. 5. The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Supaul Collectorate, Establishment Section, District- Supaul. 6. The District Development Authority, Supaul, through its Secretary, District Board, Supaul. 7. The Block Development Officer, Pipra, District- Supaul. 8. The Secretary, District Board, Supaul. 9. The Panchayat Samiti, Pipra, through Panchayat Secretary, Supaul. 10. The District Board, Supaul through Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul. 11. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 9.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2008 from the post of Tax Daroga while working in the office of respondent no.9, the retiral dues as admissible to him have not be paid till date. However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a detailed representation before the Director, Panchayati Raj-Cum-Joint Secretary, Village Development - 2 - Department, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.2), with a copy to the District Board, Supaul through Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul (respondent no.10) and the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.11). In case such a representation is filed within a period of four weeks stating distinctly the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present, the same be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)