IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34094 of 2010 1. RAM NATH YADAV 2. ASHOK YADAV -------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 16.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. F.I.R. is to the effect that the petitioner along with Brahmdeo Yadav and others caught the deceased while he was outside his house. Submission is that there is no eye witness to the incident but in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the case diary witnesses are there to state that the deceased was caught hold by this petitioner also. Thereafter only dead body is recovered. Reasons are land dispute with others including this petitioner and deceased’s love affair with a girl of other community may not belie or doubt the statement made by witnesses examined in paragraphs 6 and 7 when there is no eye witness at all on the point of strangulation by any one else. Taking the facts into consideration, the prayer for bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)