1 WP-L-2810-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAl CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2810 OF 2010 M/s. Economic Commercial Service ..Petitioner versus Union of India & Anr. ..Respondents Ms. Neeta V. Masurkar i/b. Mr. Sandeep Wasnik for Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. 13 January 2011. P.C. : Rule. Learned counsel for the Respondents waives service. With the consent of counsel and at their request, the Petition is taken up for final hearing. By an Order of the Division Bench dated 21 July 2010, the General Manager of the Western Railway was directed to consider the grievance raised by the Petitioner with reference to Circular No.6 dated 18 March 2010 of the Railway Board and to pass an order on the representation made by the Petitioner. Exfacie the communication of the Chief Commercial Manager dated 25 August 2010 does not advert to the Circular dated 18 March 2010 of the Railway Board. While directing a fresh consideration by 2 WP-L-2810-10 the General Manager, the Division Bench had specifically observed that it was the grievance of the Petitioner with reference to the above said Circular which was required to be considered. That not having been done, we allow this Petition by quashing and setting aside the impugned communication dated 25 August 2010. We direct that the General Manager of the Western Railway shall pass fresh orders on the representation of the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)