IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. ^V^^ _QF^011 LS.B,). PETITIONER fl^^ ^^^- b ^•-"r.^< b-:"'' ^y y' ^. .••""" v>s' RESPONDENTS Gokul Ram Korrcun, S/o. late Shri Kacharu Ram Korram, aged about 51 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Jhaliyamari, Block Narharpuir, District Kanker (C.G.) . VER S U S : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant CQmraissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Narharpur, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kdnker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) ^ WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .\f-- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR Bench: Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, WR!T PETITION (Sl N0.3312/2011 Gokul Ram Koi'ram State of Chhattisaarh and others IER ARTIGLE 228 OF THE CONS'TUTiON OF Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V/inay Par 7'hJ The petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teac Rs.15-0/-. After completion of his probation period, he was sc-a!eofRs.169-300/-. >n a fixed pay of sd reguiar pav 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale effect from the date of initial appointment or after compietion of probation penod. 3. The issue inyol'/ed herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribuna!, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yaa'u and S8 Others v. ofM.P. & others), wherein it was heid that t'ne similarly situated leachers ar®entitied to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bie Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court uphotding the decision o* ;'?^ '=3 '••s^ ^ z the Tribuna! to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initiai appointment. 4. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner furtSier submits that this Court, whi!e considering the same issue in Amar Sa! & Others v. of & W.P.(S).No.4725/2006, by order 01-09-2006, aliowed the petitioners to make a representation within a perio-d of ten days, raising al! the grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted iiberty to make a representation raising a!l grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and order dated 27-12-2008 (Annexure P-6) and in turn, the concerned respondenf is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three months from She date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. 6. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge iuman