ti r.a^a-i'^TJE IIBitK BI' K:1 • •I: Kl Kl Bl K K K: — JO NOIiniIlSNOO 3H1 =10 STZ ^^^IJ.yv yaaNn Noiiiiad •9-3 'jndigy 'ueMeqg -s'X'a /4U9uj4Jed9Q uoi^e-i^siuiujpv |BJ9U9£) /Aje43J39S i4&nojL|4 •9'3 'je^seg 43U^Sia /J0^9||03 U941 's^sejed 46ujs JGL|OueN 'T. •9-3 'jeisgg 43U4S!Q /J0439||03 /ue6|Gqujv 'd 'T siNaaNOdsay snsysA (•9'3) Je^seg ^u^sia /uoe6epuo>i Auo|03 'x'N'a o/y (•9'3) /J9^seg -43u^sia /!p>|eH ^eAeqoued peduer '(•S'3'y) •O'a-S 96jeq3 ui 'sjesA TS ^noqe p96y 'sjOLj^ey 'd'H 9^e~1 o/s 'sjoq^ey 'S'y ^^i%& yaNoiiiiad TTOZ/ OC •Oht,3SV31dW3lN03 ^c^ undsviia IV^H^VOSLLIVHH:>30T8nO:THC)IH 3ia,NOH 3Hl 3110^38 -t W^T'^1 [<rii<4) ^^ 5h^I^ ^ri^^ z^r ^ii^i<?i^ ^Tl1y4i5, fa<ni<i<i< ^^^.^.....c.-.^^ b WWrtT^Htcb 'iN^sT" ^n^T ^<H8[R ^a -SB ; HQtt'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 11.3.2011 Shri Satyendra Sahu, cojunsel tbr the petitioner. Heard ori admission. Leamed counsel for thf^ dated 8^ April, 2010 pas^ No. 1538/10, the respondent-j: directed to examine ttie griev^ and decide his representajl Executive Ofilcer, Janpad Pan| law and pass appropriate ord^ the date of receipt of a copy Leamed counsel for ttie has not received any comi4unication Collector to show that any d| respect of the ca.se of fhe peti^ioner the Court. Memo dated 23.10.2010 Janpad Panchayat, Darbha, after the order passed by relattng to claim of the pe^ allowance, transfer atlowance, <=hl^ld41^ 'RT^ff'? ft^l" <f^1^l< ^ 3:?f^FT 3:n^?r petitioner submits fhat vide order s^ed by this Couil in W.P. (S) pollector, Bastar at Jagdalpur was ^nce offhe petitioner and consider |:ions pending before the Chief ;hayat, Darbha, in accordance with ^rs within a period of 6 weeks from oflthe order. petitioner submits that till date he from the office of fhe ^cision has been taken by him in in compliance of the order of fHis of the Cliief Executive Officer, rhich was written to fhe petitioner CoLirt, shows that the matter itioner wifti regard to travelling inedical allowance and arrears of l-:^ ^•f;cT4 XI-HC-22 ^TI^T^T w\^ s^l 5h*4ict5 ^Ti^c? Praveen T -3-oc[ -^TPTRI^, yTl1<yjl<S, fQ<^l^y 3Tr^?r XRT^ HW^[ 5h^lich "W1, 200 ••f^^sr' ^IT^T "^RHW^rf^T r'Z> ~^si payai-eallpending communications, steps towa^ds been initiated. The said mefco involves decision in coordinatlon Treasury Office etc. Therefore, in these to respondents, at present, th^s petitioner may approach f|ie information with regard to tpie and/or any direction issued bj In case, the representation of j by the Collector m complian|: petitioner would be at liberty t|o circitmstances, <=bl<Lli<rl<Li1T1 TTTR^Tf "^ 'fe^st iPsl^K ^ <3Tf^TH vSTT^T consideration and vide several payment of various dues has also indicates that. the matter wifh various offices like District mstances, instead of issuing notice petition is finallv disposed of. The concemed CollectQr to seek decision on his representation r him to ttie Chief Executive Ofllcer. the petitioner has not been decided ;e of fhe order of this Court, the revive his petition aft.er 2 monfhs. Sd/- M»^a^br< Sbrivastava Judge 1 -ft^ ^p^