WP(C) 3232/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. I have also heard Mr. H. K. Sarmah, learned Standing counsel, ASEB. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of the denial of the ASEB authorit y to provide electricity connection to him. It appears that for electricity conn ection, electrical wire will have to be drawn through common passage of both the petitioner and the respondent No. 4. Mr. Biswas, learned counsel for the respon dent No. 4 upon reference to the counter affidavit filed by the said respondent, submits that if the electrical wires are drawn underground without disturbing w ater tank and safety tank of the respondent No. 4, there will be no objection fr om the respondent No. 4. Mr. Sarmah, learned Standing counsel, ASEB submits that for providing electrical connection to the petitioner the respondent No. 4 will have to provide a right of way by furnishing a No-objection certificate as per ASEB regulation. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, upon furnishing NOC by the respondent No . 4, the ASEB authority may provide electricity connection to the petitioner. En tire exercise shall be done by the ASEB authority as expeditiously as possible p referably within 15 days from the date of furnishing the NOC by the respondent N o. 4 which shall be submitted within 10 days from today. With the above directions, writ petition is disposed of.