CWP(T) No. 11684/2008 20.07.2010 Present: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondent. Petitioner was offered appointment in terms of Office Order dated 6.4.1999 (Annexure A-4) pursuant to the directions issued by this Court on 9.12.1998 in CMP No. 998/1998 filed in CWP No. 446 of 1997. A perusal of the said order evidences the fact that petitioner’s appointment was to be afresh and not in continuation of her earlier appointment whereby she was allegedly illegally retrenched. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that any legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Petitioner’s appointment cannot be said to be in continuation. The present petition without any merit is dismissed. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. July 20, 2010 (rana)