(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 264 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 264 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 264 OF 2004 Shivprasad Sukhdev Gupta & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Narikari Mariambai & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. N.V. Walawalkar with Surel Shah counsel for Petitioner ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. I have heard Shri. Walawalkar, the learned counsel for the petitioners and it appears that the allegations as reflected from his arguments appeared that the Court below as well as this Court were misled and thus, causing interference in the flow of justice. If that be so, there may be a case of criminal contempt within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Leave to amend. 2. Hence, the registry is directed to treat this as Criminal Contempt petition and place before the appropriate Bench.