IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2008 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31006 of 2008(N) --------------------------------------- CC.NO. 64/2003 OF ENQUIRY COMMR.& SPL.JUDGE,THRISSUR. .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- SASI.K.K, KOLLELIL HOUSE, RAMAMANGALAM KARA & VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN. RESPONDENT: --------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, ERNAKULAM THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. R. BINDU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/10/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO.31006 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Petitioner is accused in C.C. 64/2003 on the file of the court of Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur. CW1 was examined in part as PW2 on 20-2-2008. It is stated that PW2 was bound over for further chief examination on 12-3-2008. In the meantime, petitioner applied for certified copy of the deposition of PW2 on 18-4-2008. But the request was rejected. Petitioner is aggrieved. 3. In the light of the statement in the petition, information was called for from the court of Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur whether any application for copy of deposition of PW2 was preferred and if so, it was rejected for what reason. It is reported to this Court that W.P.(C) No.31006/2008 - 2 - the application was rejected since the examination of PW2 was incomplete. Request for issue of copy of other documents was however, allowed. 4. It was because examination of PW2 was not complete that the request for issue of certified copy of deposition of PW2 was not entertained. There is nothing illegal or irregular in that. 5. Though certain other allegations are also made in this writ petition, those allegations are not required to be considered by this court at this stage. There is no merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. Sd/- THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE skr // True copy // P.A. to Judge.