IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4227 of 2008 Date of decision: March 18, 2008 Ajay Kumar … Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. Petitioner workman has challenged the award (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned labour Court. We have perused the award. Learned labour Court has rightly held that in the matter of public employment, services of the petitioner were not requisitioned from the employment exchange or through advertisement. Therefore, the learned labour Court had rightly placed reliance upon State of Karnataka & others vs Uma Devi (3) and others, 2006 Supreme Court Cases (L&S) 753, and held that temporary employee or a daily wager like the petitioner is not entitled to continue on a particular post. Learned labour Court has also held that since demand notice was raised after three years, the claim of the petitioner had become stale. Well reasoned award of the learned labour Court (Annexure P-3) calls for no interference. Hence, present writ petition is dismissed. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] Judge [Ashutosh Mohunta] Judge March 18, 2008. rps