2 gay“ :. y; IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI—I ‘ v AT BILASPUR _ _ ‘ K jCHHATTKSGARH) WP. «227) No. $15 /2010 PETITIONER / Anand Das, S/o. Lakhan Las, aged AWMa‘W about 24 years, R/o. Railway V a» Colony, Tahsil 8r. Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS Ishawar Nirala, S/o. Shri Tukaram Nirala, R/o. Quartor No. C-98, Subhash Block, Post — Manikpur, Korba, Tahsil & Distt. Korba (C.G.) ' Shri Tukaram, S/o. Ghumra, R/o. (1—98, Subhas Block, Post — Manikpur, Korba, Tahsil & Distt. Korba (C.G.) RTICLE 227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS /(1) WRIT PETITION UNDER A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (227) No. 5975/2010 Anand Das Versus PETITIONER APPLICANT RESPONDENTS Ishavvar Nirala and anothér SB:— HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT :— Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Ravish Verma, Advocate for the respondsnts. o RAL 0 RD ER (28—1-2011) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. The instant petition is directed against the order dated 21—7— 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Korba in C.T’ No. 57/2009 whereby the petitioner/claimants application under Section 7 Rule 14 of C.P.C. for taking medical bills and other documents relating to injuries sustained by the petitioner was rejected. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the impugned order and further considering the fact that the documents sought to be taken on record were the documents relating to the injuries sustained in the accident and the expenses incurred in the treatment, and the documents are necessary, therefore, learned Tribunal ought to have allowed the application preferred by the claimant. Therefore, the order impugned being not sustainable deserves to be and is hereby quashed and the application for taking documents on record is allowed. The Tribunal after taking the above documents on record shall proceed for recording evidence of the parties and to decide the claim case expeditiously. Sd/— N.K.Agarwal Judge order as to costs. No