§<@ E IGH CGUR'I OF (IHHA’lvl‘ISGARH A‘i‘ BlLASPUrR WRI’l‘ PE’I‘I’l‘ION {C} No. 5256 01'2m7 PETITIONER : Nilesh Kumar Mandami, aged about 19 years, son m” Shr'i KSJ‘vianéavi, Occupatioil — Siuderxt, RA) Civil Lines, Dharamjaigarh District — Raigarh (Chhaitisgarh ) (R011 N0. 21 500461) Through * Natuvai Guardian - father KS. Maiidavi, aged about 47 years, sea of Shri Roop Sai Mandavi, Working as Tahsildar — Dharamj aigafh, District — Ragafh, R/o Civil LinaS, Dharamjaigarh. District — Raigarh (CG) VER§US . Union of ludia, through — The Secretary, Department of Humao Resourceg, Govemmerd of India, New Deihi. u e Secretary, Central Counseliing Board (AITEEE-ZOO7) MHRD Government of India, Seoi‘etariat Deihi Ei‘igiiieei’iiig College, Bimwan Road — Deihi 110 042 (Fax No. 01 1-27893514) WRKT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTI'HIHON OF INDIA. Comm : Hon’ble Shri Jagdish Bhalla. Acting ChiefJustlce & Eon’bk gin-i Satish K. Agitihotri J. ; j‘ Present: Shri A.N.Bhakta. counsel for the petitioner. \ l‘ \ Sliri S.K.Beriwal, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 26m day of October, 2007) The following order ofthe Court was passed by Hon’ble Jagdish Bhalla, Acting C.J.: The last date of admission was 30m September, 2007. Therefore, now this petition has become infruetuous. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the vacancies can be tilled up which are still lying vacant. Similarly situate aggrieved institutionsapproached to the Apex Court challenging the refusal for grant ofpeimission/renewal for conducting BDS courses during 2007-08 by the Central Government, which was disoosed of with few consequential direction/observations without examining the merits, by its judgment dated 28m $e§temben 2907, in Writ l’etition (Civil) No. 359 of 2007 (Avadh Institute of Dental Sciences Vs. Union of India and Another) and other connected matters. In View ofthe above, this petition has become inii'uctuous and is accordingly dismissed. However, this dismissal is without prejudice to the rights and contentions and reserving liberty to challenge the rejection, if it becomes necessary with RESPONDENTS )b. d V reference to 2008-2009. l Sdl— l Jagdish Bhalla Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Ag. Chief Justice E Judge Amitl' Sahu