IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4677 of 2009 Date of decision : 15.2.2010 Surjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus Manjit Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Raj Pal Kansal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate for the respondents S. D. ANAND, J. On consensual basis, the petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order shall stand set aside subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as costs. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 2.3.2010. The learned Trial Court shall adjourn the matter to 9.3.2010 for evidence of the petitioner herein who (petitioner herein) shall be entitled to file a fresh application for the summoning of municipal official. The allowance of the request in the relevant behalf stems from an averment made at the time of hearing before this Court that an earlier application for the purpose aforementioned had been misplaced from the judicial record. The averment is not challenged by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. The petitioner herein shall also be entitled to produce his other evidence, if any, on 9.3.2010. However, no further adjournment shall be granted by the learned Trial Court for the purpose aforementioned. February 15, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE