1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.3119 of 2008 Azad Shaukat Ali Shaikh Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Girish Agrawal for applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedhiya, APP for State. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. October 20, 2008. P.C. . Heard Mr.Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Dedhiya, learned APP. . The applicant has prayed for bail in C.R.No.120/2008 of Fauzdar Chawdi Police Station, Solapur. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and his minor son under Sections 302, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of IPC. It appears that the applicant runs a country liquor bar. The deceased along with his friends, at the relevant time, were in the shop and there was quarrel between them and the applicant. The complainant as well as the other witnesses, whose statements are consistent, state that the deceased was pushed out of the shop/bar by the 2 applicant who fell down and became unconscious and died of the injury caused to his head. The post mortem notes do not show any external injury to his head. The internal examination shows that there was haematoma present under scalp in left temporo-parietal region. The cause of death mentioned by the doctor is "contusion to the brain". The applicant, according to the learned counsel for the applicant, cannot be stated to have caused fatal injury with an intention to kill the deceased. Having considered the over all facts and circumstances of the case and the manner in which the alleged incident occurred, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence the following order: . The applicant - Azad Shaukat Ali Shaikh is directed to be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.35,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount subject to the condition that he shall report to the concerned police station every Saturday between 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. till conclusion of the trial. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case 3 without being influenced by the observations made in the order. . The application is accordingly disposed of.