IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION No.1275 of 2006 IN APPEAL No. 1069 of 2005 IN LAR No. 4 of 1994. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. ... Appellant. V/s. Janardhan Laxman Patil & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b M/s.Hegde & Associates for Appellant. Mr. C. M. Korde, Senior Advocate with D.H. Mehta with Mr. A. Jadhav for Respondent No. 1 and 2. Mr. M.D. Naik, A.G.P. for Respondent no. 3. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1274 of 2006. IN APPEAL No.1070 2005 IN LAR No. 7 of 1994. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ...Appellants. Versus. Jagannath Anandrao Patil & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. C. M. Lokesh i/b M/s.Hegde & Associates for the Appellant. Mr. C.M.Korde,Sr.Advocate with Mr.D.H. Mehta with Mr.A.Jadhav for respondent no. 1. Mr. M.D.Naik,A.G.P. for respondent no.2. - 2 - WITH. NOTICE OF MOTION No.1273 of 2006. IN APPEAL No. 1071 of 2005 IN LAR No. 4 of 1998. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ..Appellant. Versus. Bhalchandra Jagu Patil & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. C.M.Lokesh i/b M/s.Hegde & Associates for the Appellant. Mr. C.M.Korde, Sr.Advocate with D.H. Mehta with Mr.A.Jadhav for Respondent No. 1 to 8. Mr. M.D. Naik,A.G.P. for Respondent no. 9. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1270 of 2006 IN APPEAL No. 1072 2005 IN LAR No. 3 of 1998. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ...Appellant. Versus. Nagubai G. Patil And Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. C.M.Lokesh i./b M/s.Hegde & Associates for the Appellant. Mr. C.M. Korde, Senior Advocate with Mr. D.H.Mehta with Mr. A.Jadhav for Respondent No.1 to 5. Mr. M.D. Naik, A.G.P.,for Respondent no.6. WITH. NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1269 of 2006 IN APPEAL No. 1073 of 2005 IN - 3 - LAR No. 4 of 1998. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation., ..Appellant. Versus. Hirabai Vasudev Raut and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b M/s. Hegde & Associates for the Appellant. Mr. C.M. Korde,Sr. Advocate with D.H. Mehta with Mr. A. Jadhav for Respondent no. 1 to 5. Mr. M.D. Naik, A.G.P. for Respondent no. 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 25/04/2006. : 25/04/2006. : 25/04/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents. . In all the above appeals, appeals have already been admitted. The Notice of Motion made is absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to the condition that the appellant shall deposit the entire decretal amount with the accrued interest of date within a period of sixteen weeks from today. Upon such deposit the Prothonotary and Senior Master is directed to invest the said decretal amount and - 4 - accrued interest initially for a period of one year with any Nationalized Bank in a fixed deposit. (DR.S. (DR.S. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) RADHAKRISHNAN,J) RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (S.J. (S.J. (S.J. VAZIFDAR,J) VAZIFDAR,J) VAZIFDAR,J)