/. !/'n^ <ft HiGHCQyRT OF Cl tllATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR W.P.No.1586of2CX)1 Petitioner Ku. Vjdhi Tiwari s/o Sunl! Thyari, aged about 18 years, student of Bharatmata, H. S. School Tatibandh, Raipur. (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Ths secretery. Board of secondary Education Chhattisgarh, Raipur 2. Princjpa! Bharatmat H.S. Schoot Tatibandh. Raipur (C.G.) WRST PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COSTITUTION OF tNDIA SB: Hon'&le Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri AIok Pandey, Advocato for the petitioner. None for the respondent No. 1. Shri B. P. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORALORDER (Passsd on this 16th day of November, 2007) 1. The petitsoner was a student in the responcient No.2 school. She appeared as reguiar student in the Higher Secondary School Certifscate Examination (10+2) in the year 2000-2001. According to the petitioner she had done al! the question papers very wel} and she was awarded distjnction jn all the subjects, except in the subject 'EngSish (Sj^eciaJ)', wherein she was awarded 55 marks out of 100. FeeSing aggrteved, the petitioner applied for revaluation of the answer sheete in the above subject. 2. By this petltjon, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to give marks to the petitioner according to her performance and to declare correct result. The peti^oner seeks the above stated relief on a ssmpte ground that according to the pe^tsoner, she has done very v/ell. Since she could not sscure g^a.ei.-i^-: z-3) Thakur distinction in the subject 'Engdsh (Specia}}' also, she has alleged tampenng with the answer sheets. 3. The ground raised by fie petitjoner is frivoSous and not based on any document or other evidence. Even otherwise, the petition does not djsclose any cause of action or merit in the case. 4. in view of the foregoing, tttis petition js dismissed. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge