IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43554 of 2008 ANAND PRASAD GUPTA, S/O SITAMBER PRASAD GUPTA, R/O VILLAGE- KARMA, P.S. CHHATARPUR, DISTRICT- PALAMU ( JHARKHAND). -PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. –OPP.PARTY 2 15.12.2008 The complaint says that the petitioner was desirous of getting married for the second time despite his marriage with the complainant was still alive. The complaint has stated that due to protest by Saundik Samaj petitioner could not solemnize his second marriage and in consequences thereof the complainant was thrown out from her matrimonial home after assault. Petitioner has come up in this application with an ex-parte decree of divorce. Taking into account the nature of the complaint and the action of the petitioner as reflected above, it appears that there may be some substance in the allegation made in the complaint and, accordingly, there is no scope of passing an order of anticipatory bail. The application is, accordingly, rejected. This order will, however, not stand in the way of the petitioner applying for regular bail as and when occasion therefor will arise. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad