1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3314 OF 2009 (Tara Tea Processors and Packers .v. Indian Overseas Bank) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. M. Naik, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 16TH JUNE, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for setting aside the second demand notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation Act, 2002. The respondent/bank has placed on record their submissions and in paragraph 7 thereof, they have stated that the second notice dated 25.04.2009 was issued by them in lieu of the first notice dated 15.01.2009 issued under Section 13(2). They issued the second notice dated 25.04.2009 since the petitioner did not respond to the first notice dated 15.01.2009 within time, and under the impression/belief that the petitioner did not receive the notice dated 15.01.2009. She further submits that the petitioner should contest only the first notice dated 15.01.2009 issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation Act. In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the respondent/Bank and in view of their written submissions, learned Counsel for the petitioner does not press the present writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to contest the notice dated 15.01.2009. The petition is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty as prayed. All contentions of the parties are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.