1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2156/2010 ( Smt. Anjali W/o Ashok Samarth ..V/s.. Bhivapur Education Society, through its President & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.S. Chandurkar, Adv. for petitioner. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & F.M. REIS JJ. DATE : 5 th MAY, 2010 . Heard learned counsel for petitioner. It is contended that the petitioner is a Headmistress, who is suspended by respondent no.1 - Management; and the Committee which is constituted under Rule 36 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 is conducting the enquiry against petitioner. It is contended that one of the Member of the said Committee is not eligible to continue as a Member since he was involved in criminal case which is pending in the criminal Court. It is contended that criminal proceedings are initiated against one of the Members of the Committee i.e. respondent no.3 on the basis of the complaint made by petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner further contended that petitioner submitted representation dated 28/4/2010 to the Management in this regard and requested to change the said Member, however, said representation is still pending and the Committee is continuing with the enquiry. It is therefore, prayed that the 2 appropriate direction be given to the respondent no.1 in this regard. Normally, in absence of respondent no.1 - Management, we would not have disposed of the petition however, since the representation/complaint of the petitioner is required to be considered by the respondent no.1 in accordance with law, therefore, no prejudice as such would be caused to the respondent no.1 - Management even if the petition is disposed of with the following directions - The writ petition is disposed of and the respondent no.1 - Management is directed to decide the representation/complaint of petitioner dated 28/4/2010 in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of this order. Petitioner to communicate this order to the respondent no.1 - Management. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.