MNM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1324 OF 2010 Pramod Keluskar ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Pankaj C. Kansara, Advocate for Petitioner MR. Milind More, A.G.P. CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 11TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. The impugned order is passed on 5th May 2010 and was served on the Petitioner. Appeal has been filed on 24th May 2010. The application for stay has not been heard. The order is sought to be executed. That action would be illegal. 3. Respondent No.4 shall hear the Appeal and/or the application for stay before seeking to execute the impugned order dated 5th May 2010. 4. The Respondents’ Advocate states that the Petitioner has given the disputed premises to a Conductor who is running a Hotel in the disputed premises. The Respondents shall be entitled to take such action as they require against the Conductor. 5. Rule is made absolute accordingly. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)