IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.109 OF 2008 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1912 OF 2004 Dadaso Birbal Gavade )..Appellant Versus Raghunath Biralal Gavade & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.B.G.Tangsali for the appellant. Mr.Muley for the respondents. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 2.7.2008. PC 1. This is a Second Appeal filed by the original defendant. The plaintiff’s suit was for partition and separate possession. There is concurrent findings allowing partition and possession as prayed for by the plaintiff. It is sought to be contended that mother had applied to the Sarpanch for entering the name of the original defendant and this may be treated as relinquishment. Mere application to the Sarpanch cannot be treated as relinquishment on behalf of all shareholders. It is contended that one of the sister had also relinquished her share in the property. There is no registered deed. In the circumstances, no substantial question of law involved in this Appeal. Second Appeal stands dismissed. : 2 : CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1912 OF 2004 1. As Second Appeal is dismissed, Civil Application also stands rejected. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)