PR ETITIONE RESPONDENTS : /. (4g wwr K.S. Chauhcm S/o. Shr‘i R.K. S. Chauhan, Aged about 59 years, presenfly posfed and working as Range Officer, Indagaon, Under‘ UdanTi Forest Division, Gariyabandh, Chha‘h‘isgar‘h. VERSUS The S‘rafe of Chha‘r‘risgarh, Through: The Secrefar'y, Department of Forest ManTralaya a1- D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). -The Conservator of Forest, Raipur Circle Raipur ‘(C‘G.) Disfricf Fores’r Officer, UdonTi Forest Division, Gariyabandh, Dis’rt Raipur (6.6.) Divisional ForesT Officer, 6eneral Forest Division, Dhamtari, Shri K.K. Verma, (aqe and fafher'is' name nofe known 7‘0 pefifianer),Presently posted as Forest Ranger, in Research and Extension, Raipur Unit, Forest Division, Raipur (C.G.) /1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIseAkH AT BILAsPUR WRIT PETITION (s) Noycw o OF 2011 C9 WRIT PFTITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L Law g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BHASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4790 0f2011 PETITIONFR K..S.Chauhan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT ' PETTHON SB: UNDER Hon’ble ARTICLE Shri Satish 226 OF K. THE A nihatri. CONSTITUTION J. OF INDIA N Present: Shri Shashaxik Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State/respohdent No. 1 to 4. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 23r day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing .for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner‘ does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his representation pending before the respondent 2. Shri Sao, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State/respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner, if any, is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance pwith law, as, expeditiously as possible, authorities. preferably within a period ofthree weeks hom the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of 4 ' Sd/_ Judge _ 4 j. (Satish K. Agnihmri f ‘ /