THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25957 of 2009 ORDER: Respondent Nos.2 and 3 filed an application before the Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, respondent No.1 herein, seeking regularisation of certain unauthorised constructions, under G.O.Ms.No.901, dated 31.12.2007. Through its proceedings, dated 14.07.2009, respondent No.1 regularised the construction, subject to certain terms. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the said proceedings. It is stated that she filed O.S.No.1425 of 2009 in the Court of the II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against respondent Nos. 2 and 3 stating inter alia that her easementary rights are affected on account of the said construction. The petitioner challenges the proceedings, dated 14.07.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1. Having regard to the disposal being given to the writ petition, it is not felt necessary to issue notice to respondent Nos.2 and 3. The regularization of unauthorized construction is only from the point of view of the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955, and the byelaws made thereunder. Such regularization does not have any effect on the rights of the neighbours, be it as to the title or easement. Such rights have to be adjudicated by the civil Courts. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be said to have suffered any detriment on account of regularization. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, by observing that the regularization in favour of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall not have any effect upon the pending suit. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:01.12.2009 Note: Issue cc in three days. (B/o) kdl