t / II'I -mE HIGH COURT 0-E CHHATTISGARH J'OBICATURE AT BILASPU-R {CHHATTISGARH5 '/iRIT P3TTTION 10. ^3^ 8 /2002 PETITIONERS ? --^ .....•..^'"....••r Ct*"' , ..•••" ' Harish Kumac soa of Shri S«M«i?ha 0£ Bancsnawapara» EUrani 3astl, Raip-ir, Oihattisgarh« Puneet S.aai Sal Son of Shri Firtu Sesident of 253, , Colony, Danganiai, Oihett1. sgarh » Rain ayape Singh Kashya£ soa o£ Shrx Village and Tahsil Hagari, District DhamtarA, CSihattisgarh* 4. Aran Sahu» Son of Bhri. Harish .Klimar SeAtsil E/107, Saata Colony, E'lear Krishaa Talkiesc Raipur<| C3ihatti.sgarh « ,'£»Dharmeadra Kuniar Sahu» SOR o£ Shri B&ya Ram Sah'a, R/o Hangal Bazar, Sadihar-i. SaiEXir CKhattisgat'h. ^i Raja Ram Sahu Son of Harayan Prasad Sabu, Ward ito.IO, Kabir Ritir Ooo.Gali Ho.2 Bemetara. burg 0'uiattisgarb. 1. Pankaj KSimar Sfaarma -^ ^-'-^ -s-.-f.^^f^f' ^'^. •s'.-^s.^^ 9. 10 ion o£ ;5hrl Rara Kamar Shariaa -^y 1 ' L ^ ^ci-fcj^-i.. Sa&tosh Kumar Kannou son of Shri <i o3shopara» Raipur CSThattisgarh Bharat Nimar Rane son of Shri, D.R. Rane. P./o Rajsadra Magar, Raip'ar, aj Atul KUrae.r Jha son of Late Shri D«c.-Jba» R/o Baadhuwa Para, Purani Bastx Raip'J.r {Chhattl.sgarh)« ^. "<~ J<^ .^ VS R S 'JS RESPOJ'lD.Ein''S^ s (I _!-• Chhattisgarh State Electrxcity Dangan.la» RaliJJ,r, THROUOH Kanagl.ag Dlrector, C.S.E.B., Ral.mr« 2« seeretarys Chhattisgarh State Blstrxcity Board, Oangaaiaa Ra.lpur (C»Q.5« WRIT &ETXTIOH UI13DER, ^TrCLE _226/ 22'?_05> COM3TITUTIOH 0-E- It-OIA ^iia-.' 'tis !t<?~ ij^ u 6k~ r ^A ^ Respondenfc .3—•yirendra Kiwar Hatharia, S/o, Wdlyarthi &ai. Resj.dent o£ auarter No,3/B> Street No. - 23. Sfectorl-l» Bfaila.it Distfc. Durg (C«G.). sponBent lfe.4- si.uj.l Kumar, S/c. Shrl Moti I,al, R/o. Holkar paan Thela Ke SaBine> Titurdih, Duccr» Distt. Durg tC.G.). [T-HC-22 ^5=j '.-TCTyiq, g^FTS, •ra^TBT[^ (7n/ "^H^'^Tf £S>-'^T^ .^.i^D.:...^? /a00^ '•<- •3WSI V ;''•, ii'-^ ;hi'-.^i 'a;rR7IiFS'B 1 3TRT! IWI^ •ffi?" s?"?i?i'i'n 'crFi??! ^ fe^ 'ri^R ^ ^ >, A q^ s^^ S-H^P? !!SS3s|glg!!!g& ii^asfi^gigag;, Bhri Prashant Mishra, Advocate for the petitioners. and 2. Shri Abhlsek Smlia, Adv^cate for the respondents No. 1 Shri I.S. Sahu, Advocate for respondent No. 3. By fhis petition, the petp.tioners subiuit th&t they are apprentices and they have comjileted the tralning and entitled for preference in the inatter ofj appointtnents. It is submitted that the Chhattisgarh I.T.I. Pijashikshit Berojgar Sangh had submitted a representatiqn vlde annexiires A/9. Representations vide Annexi^res A/6 to A/8 were also submilled. to tlie Boai'd aiid ol]|ier auUioriues. II is submilted t.hat t.he petitioners havei not siibmitted indiyi.dual to^)AOL\iS t representations. It is subraittecjt that the representationsf have not been considered. Shri Mlst(ra Placed reliance on U.P.State Road Transport Corporation atid another -v- U.P. Panvahaii Nigam. Shishukhs Berozgar ^angh and others reported in 1(1995) 2 SCC 1] [also reporteS. in AIR 1995 SC 1115} and in State ofU.P. -v- Ishwarkant Blhari (2001 V-10 SCC 694). Havtng consldered the f^cts and circumstances of the case and without expressing aliy opinion on fhe merits of the ^ case, VLI fhe opinion of this CoUrt ends ofjustice will be served [1A3-Sf=git ^l' Ai-t-lt.-^z '5^ -^TqRTq, s^Fre, E'K-tl'Hy •5i,'a;s< .^^X.^i iigsy' OT^ST^! ' a;tiR>'Irf(-;I [ l\^t^'-r^ ^i'- (^t?j/' ,'wi^-if^rs 3'lt?]' T5nsr<" V^v 'W!lf?piH 'EIPRfi ^ fe'zt tfSp •^ 3ti:?rtr .31R?I ifeach petitioner is pRrmitt.Rd f.o make detailed representation individuaUy alongwith a copyj of this petition 10 days froru !' today before the competefit authority and on such representation being filed, th^ sartie shall be considered aad decided by the coinpetent ^uthority as early as possible KA^SZ- preterably within .stx sieat^- from the date ot' receipt of representations in accordanc^ with law. Ifany adverse order 1s passed, the petitioners mair avail remedy avallable i-mder the law. I With the direction afore^aid, this petition is disposed oft C.C. as per rules. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge