FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Review Petition (Stamp) No.19032 of 2005 In Writ Petition No.4147 of 2004 ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.Deshmukh for Mrs.Vinita Bakre-Shastry for petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for res.Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Dilip Bodke for res.No.5. ---- CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L GOKHALE & SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. DATED : 26th September 2005 DATED : 26th September 2005 DATED : 26th September 2005 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The order passed by us on 4th July 2005, of which a review is sought, is quite clear. We had recorded that there was no constradiction between the Government Resolution dated 31st March 2004 and the subsequent Government Resolution dated 28th April 2004. The Government Resolution made it clear that the loans were being given to the sugar factories to clear the dues of the farmers. It is only where there were no dues that the factories were permitted to use that loan amount for other purposes. The petitioner-sugar factory has already taken some order against respondent No.5. It is for the petitioner-sugar factory to execute it. It was for this purpose that Mr.Anturkar appearing for the petitioner-sugar factory had sought time on an earlier date. Since he was not present on 4th July 2004, the Writ Petition was dismissed. 3. Today, having heard Mr.Deshmukh, appearing for the petitioner-sugar factory, we have clarified the position as above and we do not find any reason to recall our order. The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.) (SMT.R.S.DALVI, J.)