1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6459 OF 2008 Nirmala Nagesh Shete & Anr. .. Petitioner. Vs. Kashinath Somling Chitte & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.A.P.Kulkarni for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Shah for respondent no.1. Mr.R.M.Kadam with P.P.Kakade A.G.P. for respondent no.3. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 21ST JULY, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. 3. Mr.Shah, learned counsel waives service for respondent no.1 and Mr.Kadam, learned A.G.P. waives service for respondent no.3. The petition is heard finally with consent of the parties. 4. By this writ petition the petitioners have impugned an order dated 11.7.2008 passed by respondent no.3, granting one line order of stay without recording any reasons. Learned counsel for the parties, in view of the judgment in Lokmanya Nagari Priyadarshani & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2007(1) Bom. C.R. 929, have fairly stated that I need not record 2 reasons for setting aside the order impugned in the present petition and they have agreed for the following order: The order dated 11.7.2008 passed by respondent no.3 in R.T.S. Appeal No.3708 of 2008 is set aside. Respondent No.3 shall endeavour to dispose of the said appeal as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of eight weeks from today. The petitioner to produce a copy of this order before respondent no.3 within a period of one week from today. Interim order passed by this court vide order dated 18.9.2008 shall remain operative till disposal of the appeal (R.T.S.Appeal No.3708 of 2008) and for a period of 15 days therefrom. While disposing of this petition I shall not be understood to have examined the merits of the case and the revisional authority shall deal with the revision on merits in accordance with law and without being influenced by this order. The writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)