IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26017 of 2008 SONU KUMAR @ RANJIT KUMAR SHASHI @ SONU YADAV @ RANJIT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 22/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, apprehending arrest in a police case registered in the year-2001 under Sections- 304A/279 of I.P.C. to which Section-302 of I.P.C. came to be added subsequently, came to this Court in an application for anticipatory bail. On 30.8.2007 this Court noticing that their warrants had been sought as late as April, 2007 on the basis of statement-164 Cr.P.C. of the informant making out entirely new case from that in the F.I.R. which was against unknown acknowledging mental instability of the alleged victim granted bail during period of investigation, till submission of chargesheet. Chargesheet is stated to have been submitted on 31.101.2007 against the petitioners and they are thus before this Court again. The submission is that charge sheet has been submitted merely on basis of the earlier 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the informant already noticed while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners without any fresh material. - 2 - Learned counsel is unable to point out any fresh materials from the investigation beyond the statement under Section-164 Cr.P.C. of the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court considers it proper to direct the petitioner above named to surrender before the court below within six weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No.100/01, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )