THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3539 of 2010 ORDER: The respondents, sons of the petitioner, filed O.S.No.17 of 2003 in the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Kurnool against the petitioner for partition of the suit schedule properties. The petitioner, in turn, filed I.A.No.1245 of 2003 for rejection of the plaint. For one reason or the other, the I.A. was not disposed of and it is stated that there is hardly any progress in the suit. The petitioner states that only in the recent past, the I.A. was heard and orders were reserved. His limited grievance is that having reserved the orders in the I.A., the trial Court is proceeding with the suit. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Normally, this Court has to issue notice to the respondents before any order is passed. However, since no specific order is challenged, it is felt that the C.R.P. can be disposed of duly avoiding the trouble, delay and expenditure to the respondents. As long as the application for rejection of plaint is pending, further proceedings in the suit cannot be taken. In case the I.A. is allowed, entire exercise becomes futile. On the other hand, if the I.A. is dismissed, a clear way becomes paved for progress in the suit. Hence, the civil revision petition is disposed of, directing that the learned I Additional District Judge, Kurnool shall pronounce the orders in I.A.No.1245 of 2003 before taking further steps in the suit. Since the suit is of the year 2003, it shall be accorded utmost priority for disposal. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:13.08.2010 kdl