IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3781 OF 1994 PETITION NO.3781 OF 1994 PETITION NO.3781 OF 1994 Harilal Ishwarlal Patel ...Petitioner V/s. Commissioner of Police, Nashik & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.S.D. Rayrikar, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. : SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. : SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE DATE DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Petition challenges the cancellation of the license granted to the petitioner for running a video games parlour. By order dated 26th August, 1994, the license which was issued for one year was cancelled. When the Petition was admitted, no interim relief was granted to the petitioner. In view of the fact that the license was granted only for one year, the Petition itself has become infructuous. 2. Apart from that, the respondent contends that the petitioner has an alternate remedy of filing an Appeal under Section 33 of the Bombay Police Act. I need not go into this contention as the Petition itself has become infructuous. 3. The Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Rule discharged.