1 8.wp.289-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.289 OF 2011 Shri Vitthal Vajir Solanki. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Respondents. .......... Mr.N.N. Gavankar, Advocate i/b. Mr.Arfan Sait, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for the State. .......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. This petition is disposed of with direction to the Appropriate Authority to reconsider the proposal regarding premature release of the Petitioner keeping in mind the observations of the Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Jagdish, 2010 (4) SCC 216. In other words, the PPD 2 8.wp.289-11 Appropriate Authority will have to give benefit to the Petitioner of the more favourable guidelines as may be applicable to the case of the Petitioner. 2. Accordingly, impugned decision is set aside and the matter is relegated before the Appropriate Authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law. That be done as expeditiously as possible, in any case, within six weeks from today. 3. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)