^ C^"3^^__ : . INTI-iatieiN'Bl.iEMIGMCOURTOFCHHAtnseARI-LAT BlLASPURfC.e.) mjc. (s) No. ~l5'Ci^ _/2oio ^w3- ys,y ^y :1. SlTBbHhath Singh S/o JangaSingh, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, R/o Village Odgi, Post eaikunthpur, Distt. Koria (C.G.) 2. yijay Pnltap 'Singh, S/o Iridrapgl Singh, aged about 46 years, Head Mcii'f'er; R/o Village Chirguda, Post PathQ, Distt.Koria (C.6.) Smf. Chdndrakala Devj, W/o MoherSdi Bhagat, gged about 47 yedrs, ^ssisTdnt Teacher, R/o Pdtna, Rost Patria, Oistt. K-'- KSaF'WNgNN . 1. g1-at6 &f Chhattisgarh Thr-ough S8|Flfary, School Eciucatioh BeiSrtment, C).K.S; Bhawan, Rajpyr :1' : . : :/::' •. %rlgi-8r, F'ublic Instructions, N| ^8% tSiff IJtt'ileW, Treasury Accoynt • I WiSiln K a Bistf; Kdi-jd p.©.) 'BfStr'Hit. tGiucatiOn^yficier; Kor'id:: (c-s-):^. ^,1':::::.'' '^ Bltfck Edueation Offrcer-, BaiKl.jntl"ipur, C)is-t't. Koria(C.&.)s K 1 ti i \''i li.n h H t-1: w \: '?^ eri-?ss%s^M~-; ^ WRITfETlTlQN U/A 226/227'OF THE CONSTFTUTEON OF INDIA /y^ ti lBFa»Hl-22; 31I^?[^I f<(-ti.<*i sn^i ^Hich •(•ificT ^SET •^TPTRTO, '0Tt)<-lilli, rs)<-ll'Mlj.< HWWI ShNKh (^..')...f^''W.'2^i ^ ^•^"'200 I- sn^i ^giwcfOT S.B.: HON'BLEJUSTICE MR. PRI1 16-12-2010 Shri Mohammed Tarik Haidel Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.U Olt Dep^rtment respcfndents tho|-igh Bhorial Counsel appearing for thi| petitioners who were appointed under the School Education aggrieved by the action of the increments in their salary even Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, permission for the same from the Counsel for the parties do involved in this petition is squarely of Yashwant Kuniar Bharad^j Vs. Anotber (2006 (II) MPJR CG.96) Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Another Counsel appearing for the petitioners make a representation; decided in accordance with law arj this Court in the matter of Yashwatt a period of four weeks from the datd In view of the foregoing, not[ the sarae is accordingly disposed of.| It is made clear that this Coifcrt on merits of the case and the authcjrity to decide the representation st): considering all the aspects of the ca^e. <=ht^ifl41Tl ^MtrH ^ ^t^ <^i«i< '^siPgiTsn^r INKER DIWAKBR ", counsel for the petitioners. for the State. petitioners submits that the the post of Assistant Teachers between 1984-1994 are in not adding two advance they did their D.Ed. from the at their own cost after seeking d^partment. |not dispute that the controversy ;overed by the order in the matter |Muaicipal Corporation, Durg & Oopesh Kuinar Vemia Vs. The |ff.P.(S) No. 4130/2005). submits that in the event, the |the same will be considered and jd in the Ught of the decisions of kucaar Bharadaj (supra) within of receipt of the representation. ['iing survives in this petition and has not expressed any opinion concemed would be at liberty tictly in accordance with law, 4. dw. Stjate Sd/- pritinker Diwakar . Judge i-n-w-"tl<3-'-t'-