SB Crlmb No.5632/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5632/2010. Pushpendra @ Pilli Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 23/6/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ VJ Shri Jai Kishan Yogi for petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the prosecutrix in her statement has clearly stated that her mother taken money from some one to sell her off and that she went with the present petitioner out of her free will. She came to Jaipur and where they stayed together in a rented room. When they were coming back to Bharatpur, they were apprehended by the police. She has also admitted that she has married the petitioner in a temple. It is contended that petitioner even otherwise is in jail since 11/4/2010. Trial of the case will take a long. Age of the SB Crlmb No.5632/10. 2 prosecutrix as per her statements recorded both under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. is 19 years. Learned Public Prosecutor has also opposed the bail application. Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Pushpendra @ Pilli S/o Shri Padam Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.17/2010 P.S. Nadbai, District Bharatpur for offence u/Ss.363, 366 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Atrocities (SC/ST) Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), VJ. anil