THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.C. No.1257 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners filed O.S.No.1057 of 2002 in the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, for the relief of permanent injunction. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court on 07.06.2007. A.S.No.158 of 2007 filed by them in the Court of V Additional District and Session Judge, Fast Track Court, Guntur, was also dismissed, on 24.02.2010. They filed S.A.No.403 of 2010 before this Court. The relief of a direction to the respondents to continue them in the suit schedule premises, was prayed for. In S.A.M.P.No.1002 of 2010, an interim direction, as prayed for, was issued by this Court, on 30.04.2010. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have violated the interim order and evicted them from the premises. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. On the face of it, the plea of the petitioners is untenable. A cross the Bar, it is stated that the petitioners did not have the benefit of any temporary injunction during the pendency of the suit. The trial Court dismissed the suit, and the appeal was also dismissed by the lower Appellate Court. Even where a case is made out for temporary injunction, it is at the most in the form of an order restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession of the petitioners. In the instant case, the direction sought and granted is to continue the petitioners in the suit schedule premises. That would be beyond the scope of the suit itself. Further, the respondents deny the averments of the petitioners. The contempt case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:23.12.2011 GJ