THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.20383 OF 2007 DATED: 27-09-2007 BETWEEN Teegala Suresh, S/o. T. Harinath Babu, Occ: Private Service, R/o. 29/3/A, Tekka Nandyala, Kurnool District and another. …PETITIONERS AND The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad and others. …RESPONDENTS ORDER: Petitioners seek a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the first respondent in seeking to pass orders in File No.F1/3034/96 in respect of the lands in Sy.No.3 admeasuring 27 guntas out of total extent of 35 guntas situated at Hydershakota Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in spite of their application dated 14.09.2007 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Petitioners submit that against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, in File No.L/1768/1995 in granting occupancy rights in favour of the father of the fifth respondent, the respondents 2 to 4 filed an appeal before the first respondent under Section 24 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 and the same is pending in file No.F1/3034/96. It is stated that after the demise of the father of the fifth respondent, the fifth respondent succeeded to the subject land and pattadar passbooks have been granted in his favour. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they filed an application before the Joint Collector – first respondent on 14.09.2007 seeking to furnish copies of papers of the case, without furnishing the same the appeal is going to be disposed. 3. I am of the opinion that as the petitioners are neither party to the appeal nor have they filed an implead petition in the said appeal, the instant writ petition filed seeking a direction to the first respondent not to dispose the appeal is misconceived and without any merits. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J September 27, 2007 DSK