bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.282 OF 1999 Mrs.Pinky A.Rajani ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India ..Respondent WRIT PETITION NO.281 OF 1999 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.283 OF 1999 M/s.Sharan Exports (I) ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India ..Respondent None for petitioners. Mr.P.S.Jetly for respondents. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE : 6TH JANUARY,2010 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Jetly Perused petition. 2. None appeared for the petitioners even on the last two dates of hearing. Even today nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners. The petitions are, thus, liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution. At any rate, we may observe that the issue sought to be raised in these petitions has already been considered and decided by the Delhi High Court against the petitioners in the case of All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India 1998 (104) E.L.T. 595 (Del.). It thus appears that the petitioners are also not keen to proceed with the petition. In this view of the matter, the petitions stand dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (K.K.TATED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)