gETgTigrgER A$PUR _ W¥H COURT {)F C‘HHATTIQGARH AT W ‘vVrit Petiiiofl “S‘: N6. 1229 of2$38 u aged imam about Narayah 51 years, Smli Working son of late as Assistant 3111i Devi Grads Prasadji II, In Soni, the office of Assistam Cannnissioner (Excise), Departmem‘ of 5r Depti. Central of Govommom‘ Home Affairs, (Union New Deihi. of India.) through Secretary, (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTTJTION OF INDIA) ‘ Present : Shri RR; Kgsarwam', Advocate for the petitioner. Shri U,N.S. D60, Govt. Advocate for the State, I ‘ Learngd counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he {1063 not wanif io press this petition on merit? except that tho petitioner be permitted fo make a representation to the Connnittee in the‘light of the judgnent and order dated 17th April, 2097 passed by * iis Court in BR. Godbole Vs. Municipal Corporation Burg and others (2007 (2) CGLJ 417; to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State have no obj eetion. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms, i.e., the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioner, if his representations are not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered earlier, the fresh representation may be considered, as expeditiously as possible within a. period of four months -' from the date of receipt of representation. The representations may be Excisc, Rajnandgaon Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). VERSUS gEWE’QNDENTS : l State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Seeretary, Govt. 2. Government Stats of Madhya ofMadhya. Pradesh, Pradesh, through Bhopai. the Chief Secretary, QfChha'tiisgarh, Raipu . 3.Con1_missionsr Pradesh, Gwaiior Department (MP). of Exciso, State of Madhya 4.C01m11igsionon Raipur (CG). Dap’rt. of Excise, _ Stab: ‘ of Chhattisgarh, SB: H’bié on Mn Saiish .A lihoiri J.) Shri ManiSh Shanna, Advocate for rho respondont No. S. ORAL ORDER {Passed on 26 of Febimly, 2003) r,/ L H BI: K considered keepiag in :3111pl0yee in one State. axercise on tbs p pariod 0f four mom‘hs fro 4,, M :r;v,, mind the fact and mstillg 0f 0f rasidglma mad posting 0f the m the daie of rev “a ”x é? the Spousa in ether State. This 7, mw’ r Sd/- ' Satish K. Agnihotn Judge eipt afa aopy 0fthis arder.