IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2008 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4625 of 2007(C) ------------------------------ CRA.588/2004 of ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS FAST TRACK COURT (ADHOC), MAVELIKKARA CC.76/2002 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, CHENGANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------ OMANA, W/O. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, PUSHPANJILI (MALAYILETH), KEEZHCHERIMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR VILLAGE (P.O), CHENGANNUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. P. UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI, PALATHUMPENGATTU VEEDU, KEEZHCHERIMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR VILLAGE (P.O), CHENGANNUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI. M.S. BREEZE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.O.NAUSHAD THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.R.P.NO. 4625/2007 : 2 : ORDER ON C.M.P. NO. 13664/2007 IN CRL.R.P.NO. 4625/2007 DISMISSED 03.04.2008 sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. /True Copy/ P.A to Judge. V. RAMKUMAR, J. ===================== Crl.R.P. No. 4625 of 2007-C ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2008 ORDER The accused in C.C. No.76 of 2002 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Chengannur for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 2946 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE rv