HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. A®ilhotrl. Writ Petition No. 1042 of 2003 Ftetitioner Versiis Respondents l. 2. 3. NOHAR LAL SAHU S/o Late Kejuram Sahu Aged 70 years R/o VUlage Bharada, Post: Kunid Distt. Dhauitari State of Chhattisga.rh Through Secretary, Nagariya Prashashan Vikas Vibhag (Locai SeIfGovemment) D.K.S. Bhawan, Maatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Miuiiciual Officer Municipal coiuinittee, Kiu-ud, through CMO Distt. Dhamtari Director, Nagriya Prashasan Vikas Vibhag, Govt. ofC.G. Raipiir CoUector, Dharatari Shri Jiteudra Nafh Naade, couasel for tlie petitioner. Shri S.Diibey, Go\rt. Advocate forfhe respondcnts No. 1, 3 and 4. Shri Sanjay K Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.2. !_ ORAL O RD E R (6& Februaiy, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits fhat the petitioner was denied the benefit for which he was entifled to, at the time of retu-emeutw.e.f. 31.3.1991. 2. Leamed counsel, 011 instruction, subiaits fhat fhe petitioner be pemiitted to withdraw fhe petition with Uberty to inake a representation to fhe respondents for consideiation of case of fhe petitioner synipafheticalty, to which leamed counsel for the respondeats have no objection. 3. In vieiv ofthe foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn wifh Vberty to fhe petitioner to inake a representation befoi^ the concerued authonties. In fhe event, any repi-eseutation for grant of pension is inade by the petitioner to the i-espondent-aufhority, the saine shaU be considered aiid decided withia a period of sfac weeks froni the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law. No order as to cost. Sd/- 1 K; Judge ^asssK'^-