IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41179 of 2009 GANESH SAH @ GANESH SAO SON OF SRI SHYAM SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANPUR BAIRIYA, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTT. PATNA. ----PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 03/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the stolen Maruti car was recovered from garage of Mahendra Sah. He made a confessional statement in which he claimed that this petitioner had brought the car in his garage for repairing. On that ground, he was allowed bail by this Court by order dated 12.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 24526 of 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had enmity with the said owner of the garage and therefore, to save his skin, he has falsely implicated this petitioner. It is said that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he surrendered himself on 6.4.2009 and since then he is in judicial custody. He submits that Maruti car has been recovered by the Police and has been handed over back to the owner. Considering the above facts and particularly that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, this application is allowed. Let petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Anand Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Second Class, Patna, in connection with Pirbahor P.S. Case No. 122 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioners. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. S.Ali (J.N. Singh, J.)