'^ 7^>y IN TBDE HIGH COBRT OF JIJDIGATCRE ATBILASPUR, GHHATI1SGARB1 WMT PETTFION N0. it'St»F2005 PETITIONER:- (/ IJpendraKumarPatelS/o^BIltfotNath Patel, Sarpanch Gram PanGhayat Bmgindih, B/0 ViBage RengaImiuIa^Bldck & Tehsfl Sarangarh District Raigarh (C.G). VERSUS • .^^ y^TL^ ./' ^^^' ^-y.M€y .^^ ••• ^yy' <&°'" !...••'' ^^ ^' .^<^' G' RESPONDENTS:-1. Seeta Ram PatelS/o Narayan Trasad Patel <: B/oviBageBaigm<iai,GramPanchayat Baigindih, Blpck and TehsilrSarangarh District Raigaifa(C<;). ^ ' 2. PresGribcAutfionty /S.D.O (Bevenue) SarangarhDistrictRaigar&(G<3). /3.ShyamKiunarS/oNetramPateIagedabout 38 years occBpatiau cultiyatum B/p viBage Kandul Pali, Post Offiw'SaIar Teluiil SarangarhJ>ratrictRaj®arK(CyG) ^'4. SaviShaiiil^^S/0 Rwneswai'Pa^ aged ^^^^^^ ^ / 5. Teeka ItamJS/o Bd^Smgb Eatet^edSS yeaTS,<»ecil^>atioBcultivatiaMK!E^viBa^ KandulPaIi,.PustOtGce SalarTteKsa / 6. BhoopatiI.aI S/oPooltRam.Sluwasaged ab<mt22yeaisoccuimtiun<;ultn[attonlt/o viBaga^Slibraghati.iPostQfiGci^SaIaF Tebs&SaraagarltIMsd'ictSaigarh (C.G.) 'EW iiiWi "1f'UITT""' 1. 2. 3. WBTEPETraK>N®NDERARTB@IiE2230FTHE (MM^TFEGa'tONtM'MDlA : PARTIC'CIARSORTBE PEITiTOSBEfe- as ^ven inttte caiisctitle. PAKTICOl.ABS^^HEgKESBONBEm'S:- asgivenin^t^;<:auseltitl&Si[^''^.l:'i::'^:!'... ^ PARM£tB!I.^3RS|;t®r^"I'Hii!(MtR@t]A®&B ^E" THE:PEFni0FIS'i^IN<ffiWAIiB:-'l^"\- IWlSEigBE, :a ••'•:^\ ^'N-1 :-?^!^?a? i:[i':—.'-^:.s-''; y'/'-: '^sMi!^^^^^^ '^i8S^sSS/t^Sj^1^^^^ M©^^^^£3;^ "^^IKSi^ XI-HC-22 3:s?^l|A|lcf^, »Tfl'M'is,Rictitiy 311^1 MS|et» *<1*<^1 sh*licb ••^•'•••••"•^••"^••-g^ 200-> tcl^ "••••••" 3n^T9iT f^Rsn^r OTWHfN B5»r« •tlKat Wa .l.*Ui^t. ^/ ; i --7- <•" :i''^ ''VW.I'TW" illT'll'IllI sn^TWdWtifer :Vr-i .,-. B.ri K.N.'Naude, coijinsel for the petitioner. "••s..i3'S-S?i': The petitioner has under ATticle 227 of questionirtg the legality 12.5.2005 (Annexure P Officer whereby the Issue Nos.6 to 8 Will also petition, -I Having heard learnej haviug cOnsidered the ft case, I do not firid any ^ order passed by fhe Pres<j order does not require ir^ Article 227 of the Constj petition is disinissed at Consequently, M,(| Nos.4914/05 and 4915/0| Prelscribed *l<ltcl41-f TORff fffS^6 <R|+&1< ^3:l1^T3D^T preferred this writ petition the Constitution of India and propriety of order dated l)passcd by the Prescribed Officer has held that be decided along with the main (1 counsel for the p.etitiorier and icts and circumstances of the i|llegality or irregualarity in the •ribed Officer and as such, this Iterference fay this Court under [tution of India. Therefore, the adinissioa stage itself. tUe W.)P. No,2015/05 &, 5 also stand disuiissed. I.A. Vfc^ ^••^e ('flt^fN')