1 ABA-32.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.32 OF 2011 Sunil Sonyabapu Wandhekar .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Ms Racheeta Dhuru i/b Shri Avinash Avhad for the Applicant. Shri J.P. Kharge, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2011 P.C: Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. This is husband's application for anticipatory bail in an offence registered on wife's complaint that the applicant committed theft of nine gold ornaments worth Rs. 3,36,000/- belonging to her. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has not committed any such theft. There is a matrimonial discord and the Social Service Branch of Pune Police have asked the parties to file a matrimonial dispute before 2 ABA-32.11 the Family Court. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant would deposit within two weeks a sum of Rs.3,36,000/- with the trial Magistrate. In view of this, the applicant's being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. Therefore, the application is allowed. In the event of his arrest the applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.378 of 2010 of Kothrud Police Station, Pune on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- on the condition that the applicant shall report at the police station concerned on 21-1-2011 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicant shall deposit with the trial Magistrate a sum of Rs.3,36,000/- within two weeks. On such deposit being made, the learned Magistrate shall invest the said amount in fixed deposit in any nationalized Bank and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per the result of the case. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and he shall not leave the 3 ABA-32.11 country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 3. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 4. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)