IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28621 of 2009 RAJEEV YADAV, Son of Yogdhar Yadav, resident of Village- Kushmoul, P.S. Bhargama, District-Araria................................................Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar.............................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 14.9.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he is said to have demanded “Rangdari” from the informant who is in the jail custody from Mobile number as mentioned in the First Information Report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Mobile number mentioned in the First Information Report does not belong to the petitioner. This aspect of the matter obviously has to be determined by the Investigating Officer. Considering the allegation, I find that this is very serious crime, and as such, the application is rejected for the present. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)