IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 8167 of 2008 Between: S. Mohammad Ali, S/o. S. Mahaboob Saheb, R/o. D.No. 12/110, Ammavarisala Street, Kadapa. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Kadapa District, Kadapa. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in resuming the land an extent of Ac. 5.20 cents in Survey No. 408/7 of Chinnachowk, Kadapa Mandal and Kadapa District wihout paying the compensation as per the provisions of Land Acquisition Act is illegal, arbitrary and against to the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 31 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the compensation as per G.O.ms.NO. 1391 Revenue (L.A) Department, dated 30-10-2007 to the land and to 269 teak plants and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.8167 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in W.P.No.9771 of 2008 dated 11.6.2008 and this writ petition is also liable to be disposed of in the light of the said judgment. In view of the above, following the above judgment, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to pay full compensation to the petitioner, as per the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. However, this mandamus shall be enforceable subject to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the appeals filed against the decision in Mekala Pandu’s case[1]. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 17.3.2009 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.8167 of 2008 17.3.2009 [1] 2004(2) ALD 451 (LB)