IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2007 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11491 of 2007(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ HAPPY JOSE PULIKKOTTIL W/O PIUS ALAPPAT, AGED 30 YEARS HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT ( MATHS) ST. FRANCIS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MATTOM, THRISSUR- 680 602 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT 4. THE MANAGER ST.FRANCIS SCHOOLS, MATTOM THRISSUR 5. THE HEADMASTER ST.FRANCIS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL MATTOM, THRISSUR- 680 602 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.11491 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2007 JUDGMENT Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P11, petitioner has preferred Ext.P15 revision. I heard learned Government Pleader also. I feel that as the petitioner has already approached the revisional authority, a decision should be taken on the revision. In such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P15 in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all the affected parties within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.M.JOSEPH JUDGE sv.