THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.14788 OF 2010 Dated 4th August, 2010 Between: Rampally Ravi Kumar …Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police and four others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Ch.C.Satyanarayana for Sri G.Tuhin Kumar Counsel for respondents 1 and 2: AGP for Home The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “The petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st and 2nd respondents in not taking action on the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 21.06.2010 against 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the complaint filed by the petitioner on 21.06.2010 against 3rd respondent.” At the hearing, Sri Ch.C.Satyanarayana, learned counsel representing Sri G.Tuhin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.18632 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 4th August, 2010 vrn