IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7007 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.129/2010 OF KUNNAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. ...................... PETITIONER/5TH ACCUSED ---------------------------------------- M. RENJITH @ KAKKA RENJITH, S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN, MANGALOLI VEEDU, P.O.GURUVAYOORAPPAN COLLEGE, POKKUNNU, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN, SRI.K.S. PRAVEEN. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No.7007 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated: 16.11.2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 5th accused in Crime No.129/2010 of Kunnamangalam Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 394,120(b), 109 and 411 read with 34 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 12.04.2010 The petitioner was arrested on 10.07.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the petitioner is the person who had planned the operation resulting in the theft of 1.30 kgs of gold worth more than `20 lakhs and that he is an accused in five other crimes involving offences punishable under Sections 379 and 392 IPC 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj