C.R. No.7127 of 2009 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.R. No.7127 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 03.12.2009 **** Pardeep Kumar . . . . Petitioner VS. Board of School Education Haryana Bhiwani through its secretary . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 9.11.2009 (Annexure P-2). The grievance of the petitioner is that he has filed a suit for correction of his date of birth, which has been fixed for arguments on 22.2.2010. The petitioner had earlier filed a petition, in this Court, which was disposed of vide order dated 7.10.2009 with a direction to move an appropriate application before the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Karnal for the purpose of preponement of the case. In pursuance thereof, petitioner had filed an application to the District Judge, Karnal, which has been disposed of vide impugned order (Annexure P-2). It is categorically mentioned by the learned Court below that there is a heavy pendency of cases in the Court and also at Civil Court, Panipat of the cases of trial of the accused persons, C.R. No.7127 of 2009 - 2 - who are in custody. Therefore, it was not found feasible to transfer the case from the present Court to another Court by preponing the matter. However, the learned Trial Court was directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously and if possible on the date already fixed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is a great urgency and still learned Court below has given a direction of disposal of the suit on the date fixed, if possible. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the revision petition, however, order dated 9.11.2009 is hereby modified to the extent that the learned Court below shall positively decide the suit on the date fixed. With this direction, present petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) DECEMBER 03, 2009 JUDGE Vivek