IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3249 of 2009 1. Parmeshwar Chaudhary S/O Late Ram Krishna Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Karnpur, Post And P.S. And Distt.- Supaul 2. Sushil Kumar S/O Late Kanai Yadav R/O Vill.- Lalpatti, Post- Begheli, P.S.- Triveniganj, Distt.- Supaul 3. Arun Kumar Mukhiya S/O Late Meethu Mukhia R/O Mohalla- Ward No. 13, Supaul, Post, P.S. And Distt.- Supaul 4. Moh. Ali S/O Late Moh. Jalil, R/O Vill.- And Post Pipra Khurd, P.S. And Distt.- Supaul 5. Suresh Kumar S/O Late Laxmi Ram R/O Vill.- Ekma, Post Gadh Baruwari, P.S. And Distt.- Supaul ---Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Kumar Ravi, the District Magistrate, Supaul 3. Sudhir Kumar, the Commissioner, Kosi Division, Saharsa 4. Ratneshwar Kumar, the Deputy Collector, Establishment Collectorate, Supaul 5. Prabhat Shankar, the Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul ---Opposite Parties ---------------------------------- 3. 23.8.2011 A rejoinder to the show cause has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. It is not in dispute that the panel in question has expired and as such the appointment cannot be made from the said panel. However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court to Letter no.29-2/Estt. dated 12th of January, 2011 written by the District Magistrate, Supaul to the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Bihar, Patna with respect to seeking further instructions in the matter in the light of various orders, including the order dated 11.5.2004 passed in CWJC No.12493 of 2000. - 2 - Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in case the guidelines are given as sought for by the District Magistrate, Supaul, it goes without saying that if the case of the petitioners is also covered, appropriate order should also be passed in favour of the petitioners. The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)