1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8019/2010 Prahalad Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. N.R. Budania, for the petitioner. This petition for writ is preferred to challenge clause 8 (iv) of the order dated 25.6.2010 issued by the Government of Rajasthan prescribing model norms for the elections of the Students' Union. As per the condition concerned, as aspirant for election should not have any academic due, meaning thereby that he should have cleared all the papers and should not have any due paper or supplementary examination. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the present petitioner is having a due paper in compulsory subject, which he could have qualify in three academic sessions and as such that cannot be an impediment for contesting the election. 2 I do not find any merit in the argument advanced. If the student is having academic due then he is not eligible to contest the election. Admittedly in the present case, the petitioner is yet to qualify examination in the subject of English for B.A. Ist year and IInd year examinations. He is admittedly not eligible to contest the election. As a matter of fact, the norms prescribed relates to administrative and academic criteria for the aspirant who want to contest the election, and those are not at all unjust or arbitrary. No interference of this Court while exercising powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, thus, is warranted. Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. RM/