IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 31530 of 2009(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MONACHAN K.M.,S/O. MAMACHAN KIZHAKKUMKARA VEEDU, URUKUNNU P.O., THENMALA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.B.MOHANLAL, MR.A.SANIL KUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE THENMALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THENMALA P.O.KOLLAM. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31530 OF 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Notice to 2nd respondent dispensed with preserving its right to seek rehearing of this Writ Petition, if aggrieved. 2. Though the petitioner seeks different reliefs, the first requirement is that the 2nd respondent shall act in terms of the directions of the Tribunal and do the needful following Ext.P7. That order was issued on 4.6.2009. Therefore, without expressing anything on merits, the Writ Petition is ordered directing that the 2nd respondent will take necessary action for Ext.P7 and issue orders finally, in accordance with law, if necessary, after issuing provisional notice. Let this be done, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All other issues are left open. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge ps