AB 1022/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AC UPADHYAY Heard Mr.S.Munir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. This is an application U/s. 438 CrPC seeking pre-arrest bail on behalf of the petitioner, namely, Mrs. Kakumoni Saikia in connection with North Lakhimpur P.S.Case No.133/2011 being registered U/s. 498(A)/326 IPC. Mr. B.B.Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P.Assam by producing the case dia ry has apprised the court regarding the progress of investigation and also submi tted that there is no incriminating materials against the petitioner in the case diary. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the daughter of the accused named in the FIR, but she is livin g in a different locality far away from the place of occurrence with her husban d, but at the time of incident, she was not present in the house where the incid ent had occurred. It is stated in the FIR that the petitioner was tortured both physically and mentally by her mother- in- law and father-in-law by demanding do wry and due to the torture she allegedly committed suicide by pouring kerosene. On perusal of the case diary and other materials on recor d, it appears that there is no incriminating materials to create any apprehensio n of arrest of the petitioner by the police. Therefore, this court is of the co nsidered view that apprehension of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid case is unfounded and unjustified. Consequently, there is no quest ion of considering of the pre-arrest bail prayer on behalf of the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail to the petitione r stands rejected.