1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2645/2009 (Matinkhan Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.A.G.Qureshi, Adv., for the applicants. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:25/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the accused/applicants who seek pre- arrest bail in crime No.46/2009, registered with Sonpeth Police Station. 2. Having heard learned A.P.P. and learned Counsel for the accused/applicants and perusal of the record, I find almost all the witnesses have implicated the accused/applicants herein, including Sarfarzkhan @ Guddu s/o Yakinkhan. Spiecific role is pointed to the accused persons. 2 Witness Balaji implicates Guddu (Sarfarzkhan), the incident is dt. 13.7.2009, recovery is to be made. The driver was in custody. The injury certificate explains the position. In the situation, no case to exercise discretion. Hence order: Criminal Application is dismissed. The interim protection granted by order dt.5th August, 2009, is vacated. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2645-09crapl ...