A.O. No. 468/2008 UHon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this appeal, under Order 43 Rule 1 C.P.C., the appellant, who is the defendant in O.S. No. 6/2008, Himalayan Institute Vs. Heritage Institute, has prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 18-11- 2008, passed by the District Judge, Dehradin in the aforesaid suit. Heard Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri V.K. Kohli, learned Senior Advocate, for the respondent, and perused the record. The impugned order shows that the appellant, who is the defendant before the court below has still an opportunity to file the objection against the application filed by the plaintiff/respondent for obtaining ad interim injunction. The appellant shall take all the pleas before the court below in the objection to be filed by him. At this stage, I do not find any merit in this case. The appeal is accordingly dismissed in limine. However, I direct the court below to decide the application 6-C expeditiously and without causing any unreasonable delay. In case if the objection by the appellant is filed by the date fixed, then the application 6-C should be decided by court below preferably within a period of 45 days. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) Dated: 2-12-2008 ISB