@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH : BILASPUR Writ P€titi011 (C) No. 4486 of 2008 W'Ri’l‘ PE’I‘I’l‘ION UNDER AR’I‘ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TNDIA (SB: Hen’ble Shri Satish K. Agm‘hotlri J.) Shri Ajay Shnvastava, Advocate for the petitmnsr. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent} State. 0RDE§ (Passed on this 14th Day ot‘AuguSt, 2008) With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Leanled counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that the application for grant of permit was made by the petitioner on 2.7.2007 (Annexure P[ 1). The respondent/authority has not considered and decided the application as yet. lf the application has been made, why the same has not been considered, is not known. It is beyond one’s comprehension asto Why the application for grant of stage carnage permit has not been considered and decided for such a long period. It is, accordingly, expected that the respondent/ authority shall look into the matter and pass the order, in accordance with law, expeditiously. In View of the above, this petition stands disposed of. 7M I Thakur , Sdx- I i; Judge Satish K. Agnihotri‘g ’1, .7- Petitioner Nand Kishor Jain, Aged about 36 years, Shxi Sampat La} Jain, R/o Vikash Kandagaon, Bastar, Distt. Bastar (CG) Versus Respondsnts Regional Transport Authon'ty, Bastar Region, Jagdalpur, Distn‘ct —- we;