IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-26872 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.9.2010 ... Mrs Satinder Kaur ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. S.P. Soi, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Sh. Ajay Singla, Advocate for complainant- respondent No.2. ... K.C. Puri, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inadvertently, Section 461 IPC has been mentioned instead of Section 468 IPC in the petition. Necessary correction be made. Sh. Ajay Singla, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the attorney of the complainant and has filed an affidavit of the attorney of the complainant in which it is mentioned that parties have compromised. A copy of power of attorney has also been placed on the file. The attorney of complainant is also present in person and has been identified by his counsel Sh. Ajay Singla. So, the order dated 14.9.2010, passed by this Court is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 22.9.2010 Judge chugh