1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 3321/2011 Sau. Veena Rambhau Raut -versus- Zilla Parishad, Chandrapur and others. __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 10, 2011. Heard Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, learned Counsel for petitioner and Ms. Inamdar, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4. We find that the reason given by the petitioner for seeking her transfer was accepted as a special reason and accordingly her name figured in the proposal of request for transfers prepared by the respondent Zilla Parishad. However, while effecting final directions, her name has been dropped. 2 Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner has invited attention to the fact that in two instances i.e. in the case of Smt. Surekha Wandhare and J.D. Potey, transfer as sought for have been effected and reasons given there have been found as special reason, the normal rule of not re-transferring back to same Panchayat, was not followed in their case. Learned counsel for respondents states that reason for making exception as in case of Smt. Wandhare and Potey is, Smt. Vandre was a widow and Potey happens to be office bearer of Shikshan Sangatana. It is apparent that though respondents have accepted the reason given by petitioner as special reason, further consideration is denied. The case of petitioner for transfer as per her request needed proper consideration, and injustice has not been done. Shri Bhandarkar, learned counsel has contended that the post on which the petitioner has sought transfer is still lying vacant. However, we are 3 not in a position to pass any orders asking the respondents to post the petitioner on alleged vacant post. We permit petitioner to make representation to respondent no.1 within a period of two weeks from today and if same is made, respondent no.1 shall consider it in the light of the above observations and take a decision within further period of four weeks by passing appropriate orders. With these directions, we dispose of the petition. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.