1612caw3119.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL. APPLICATION (W) NO. 3119 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2369/2006. Sudhakar Baliram Katkar -VERSUS- Krushi Utpanna Bazar Samiti and another. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2011. Heard Shri Pramod Varma, learned Counsel for review applicant, who was respondent in Writ Petition No.2369/2006. Review is sought on the ground that judgment of Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Karnataka .vrs. Umadevi (AIR 2006 SC 1806), has been explained by the Hon'ble Apex Court in judgment reported at 2009 III CLR 1612caw3119.11 2 262 (M.S.R.T.C. and another .vrs. Castribe Rajya P. Karmachari Sanghtana). Learned Counsel however, fairly states that after this Court delivered the impugned judgment on 13.12.2006 and thereafter, the applicant had approached the Hon'ble Apex Court, but the Hon'ble Apex Court did not grant leave. It is apparent that the subsequent judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court by itself cannot be a ground for review. In such circumstances, I find that the application is misconceived, the same is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE Rgd