IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 35661 of 2009 Date of decision: 07.04.2010 Vijay alias Badri Ram ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Jetinder Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana for the respondent- State Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Mr. Sanjiv Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana, on instructions from ASI- Rameshwar Dass, states that the petitioner has since been acquitted. Accordingly, the pressent petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 07.04.2010 mohan