IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 420 of 2010 Decided on: 24.2.2011 Ms. Sanjaya Sharma and others …Petitioners Versus Shri Srikant Baldi and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General prays for and is permitted to file copy of affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 1 in the Court, paragraph-3 whereof reads thus: “The Government vide letter No. Shiksha-II-Chha(1)-10/1996-11 dated 16.2.2011 has directed the Director High Education to implement the decision of the Hon'ble Court.” 2. Consequently, in view of the categorical undertaking given in para-3 of the affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent-State to implement the judgment in question within a period of four weeks from today. It is made clear that the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -3- benefits accrued to the petitioner shall be paid within a further period of one month . No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge February 24, 2011 (K. Attri)