THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY W.P.No.2110 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The writ petition is filed questioning the judgment made in L.G.C.No.156 of 1998 dated 7.10.2002 on the file of the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad. The petitioner herein is the applicant in L.G.C.No.156 of 1998 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Special Court’). He filed the LGC under Section 8(1) of A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act seeking to declare the respondents as land grabbers in respect of the application schedule land and for delivery of the same in his favour after evicting the respondents therefrom and to punish them etc. The Special Court, on the consideration of the matter, by the judgment dated 7.10.2002 dismissed the application holding the respondents as not land grabbers. Hence this writ petition. This Court by order dated 18.4.2011 granted four weeks time to comply with office objections by paying batta due and furnishing correct address of the respondents 2 and 3 observing that, in default of it, the writ petition would stand dismissed against the respondents 2 and 3 without further reference to the Court. The said order was not complied with and the same was given effect to and the writ petition was dismissed as against the respondents 2 and 3 and it became final. Therefore, as the judgment of the Special Court has become final against the respondents 2 and 3 out of the three respondents and it is the claim of the petitioner that all the respondents have jointly grabbed the property, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief against the respondent No.1. We are of the opinion that there cannot be any different and conflicting order against the respondent No.1 on the same set of facts since the judgment passed by the Special Court is an inseparable one and as such cannot be proceeded as against the respondent No.1 herein. The order of the Special Court is binding on the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J ________________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J Date: 9.8.2011 DA