' CHHA1"”i‘ISGARH. BILA$9UR iIIGH CUURI OF Wy. g6) N ‘ o. 6038 ot 2mm ‘ ViveK iviishra, 5/0. Shri Bahuran Mk uchin, m gm; agbd ALWwL uwvm. a!) v; )ymo, .,;.¢v., ivv Dia- V‘Haue Bunaa P S nussare’ "I‘a‘nsn and matracthagam (cs; Versus . District Consumers Redressal Ferum, Raigarh, through ita Presdlent . Kedamath Patel, 5/0. Ramml Patei. aged absut 38 years, rasident of Vinaae Baman. Tans" Sarangam, D%3trict Raigarh (uw; f‘h\ 227 of the Constitution of India Writ Petition under Anime ‘ ADDealance: shn NI.K.BnadurL Advocate, appears on benan‘ of Shri ”i’ .K. [Iwarr Counsei tor the petltlo 1er. (JRAL ORUElfg I94_1n_2n§§\ \h" IV U V, SUNIL KUIVIAR SIM-m. J. Heard. The petitioner has med this petition chanenging the vaiicnty of order dated 14.6.2007 passed in Case No. 14/2d07 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum: Raigarh,wnereby the said Forum has dtrected to pay certain amount to respondent No.2 by the petitioner along with specified interest. Admittediy: the order has been passed under the provrsions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 15 otthe Consumer Prot ction Act prowdes for an appeal. it provides that any person PEI“i"l‘IONER RE$PONDEN13 1 z \ w.P.(C) No. 6033/2008 \ aggrieved by an order made by the Ursmct Forum, may prerer an appear against such an order to the State Commission Withm a period of thirty days from the date of the order 1n sucn . form and manner as may be prescribed. In View of the above provreron or appeal, I am not incuned to entertain this writ petition. Therefore, tnrs petition is dismissed at the motion stage itseif. However. the petitioner shaii be at liberty to avail the remedy oi appeai as aiso. any other appropriate remedy avaiiapie to him in accordance with law. ‘ ’ ‘ ;,Sunil Kumar Sinha h Judge y Sd/— i !