IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No. 6398 of 2008 Date of decision: 3.8.2010 Madan lal .. Petitioner. Vs. HRTC and Anr. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : None for the petitioner. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner approached this Court since aggrieved by the recovery at Annexure A/II. As per Annexure A/II, dated 22.2.1992 the recovery was initiated on the basis of compensation awarded to the victim on account of motor vehicle accident caused by the vehicle driven by the petitioner. It is not in dispute that there was no conviction of the petitioner by the criminal court. Therefore, in view of the policy of the Corporation, that recovery 2 need not been effected when there is no conviction by the criminal court, the recovery cannot be justified. Accordingly the impugned order of recovery is set aside. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 3, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (GR/Vt) Judge.