IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2008 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 6358 of 2008(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. VINU KOSHY ABRAHAM, 10 B4, ABM TOWERS, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN-20. 2. ABM BUILDERS PVT, LTD., KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN-20. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.K.ABRAHAM. BY ADV. SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, COCHIN 682 011. 2. ABM TOWERS RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, ABM TOWERS, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN - 20. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVT., INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SHRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC, CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2008, THE COURT ON 22/02/2008 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 6358 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T In the nature of the relief which is being given to the petitioner, I am not inclined to issue notice to the respondents. The appeal, Ext.P2, preferred against Ext.P1 order of the Secretary was dismissed by the Tribunal for default. Shri.E.R.Venkiteswaran, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the circumstances, under which the appeal came to be dismissed for default, have been truly and correctly disclosed in the writ petition as well as in the affidavit which has been filed in support of Ext.P3 application for restoration subsequently filed. I am told that the Tribunal is yet to register Ext.P3. I do not find any reason to doubt the correctness of the averments in the affidavit sworn to by the learned advocate himself in support of Ext.P3 application. I dispose of the writ petition directing the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions to register Ext.P3 at the earliest and dispose of the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month of registering Ext.P3. Since I am informed that till Ext.P2 appeal was dismissed for default, Ext.P1 was under stay, I order that Ext.P1 will continue to be stayed till the application, Ext.P3, is disposed of. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) jg