CWP No.2171 of 2008. 06.11.2008 Present: Mr. Anuj Nag, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In the light of the report of Tehsildar that Opposite Party No.5 comes from the feeding area, we do not find that the two Courts below erred in holding in favour of Opposite Party No.5. In the light of above, no interference is warranted under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, so also all other pending applications. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. November 06, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (rc)