IT'?VETITI'0N~N¢£A‘ ‘21 s}7- i _ OF at;aaaéi » W V Peereet Ram Barina, aged about #5 years, caste' BnlnJwar resident ef village Arauni Thana- Khasdol, Dist' Raipur (C G). k f: 1 State 9f Cnnattlsgarn‘ 7’ ‘ ' tarougn' K Bnawan, Cnief Baipur Secretary,. (C G) . state of Chhattisgarn’ tarougn~‘Home Ministry D K.Bnawan, Raipur (C G) 3. Director GEneral of Pollce, Raipur (C G) h Superintendent of Police, JanJglr (C G). ¢ . 2 IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASP eeree am Ban Pt R ha ._.‘#_ _ »; ~**"“”~ g‘‘": n tate of Chhattlsarh & Oter S g hs ITION UNDER ARTIE CL 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDlA (SB Hon’ble Mr Satlsh Agmhotrl, J "-' Smt Amu AhUJa Advocate forthe petitioner V Shrl A V Shndhar Panel Lawyer for the State/ rewdents ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 15‘ day of October, 2010) By this petmon the petrtloner seeks a direction that the respondenti authorities may consrder the case of the petitioner for grant of~ t 'suffcrent compensation Secondly, ‘a cnmmat proceeding maybe? r §Imtlated against the Pulan who Is alleged to have role In death. x l 1f I Uttra Kumar son of the petltloner 5» ln response the State respondents have flled return stating the he alleged Pu;an has already been arrested and matter ls pending i I _ _ trial In the Court of Sessron Judge at Bllaspur With regard to the ' ' contentlon of grant of compensation it is stated by learned counseil y r r for the respondents that there is already a Committee to conSIder , l, the cases of oompensation in respect of murder of a Sohedul - ";MA_.a._,‘ a-t'w« "~1 ‘ i t l e f l Trrbe The petitioner may approach the said Committee and their a l l t f same shall be consrdered and decrded in accordance wrth law " In View of the foregorng, nothing remains for adjudication Thusg, _ l he petition stands disposed of No order asto costs ‘ f ' . _ /saT/ ans“ K Agnlh0“'l Judge H UR.‘ ° 54*4“; m;“w, K ) L ' 7 of l ; 7 t ‘f- ' u ‘ V i L y t f * r //\ LI, 7 g , MK I