IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1667 of 2008 BAIDYANATH PRASAD SINGH SON OF LATE GANNU SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MOHIUDDINPUR, POLICE STATION – BIDDUPUR, DISTRICT - VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 4. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 04. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has earlier filed a representation before the District Education Officer, Vaishali, as contained in Annexures - 5 and 6. However, for expeditious disposal of his pending claims with regard to the payment of gratuity and pension, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the 2 above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)