IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14733 of 2011 Shayam Kumar Roy Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 14.9.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer prays for quashing letter no.1327 dated 11.7.2011 issued by the Block Development Officer, Darbhanga, directing refund of a sum of Rs.5,83,261.47 paise towards the value of undistributed 417.51 quintals of rice allotted to him for the years 2004-2005 under SGRY-2 Scheme. The petitioner submits that his area is flood affected area and the godown and storage of the petitioner was duly affected. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No.711 of 2011( Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C.No.757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 0607.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No.711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No.757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No.711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No.757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. 2 This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20%. AnilKrSinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)