IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15911 of 2009 GAUTAM PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15912 of 2009 RATNADEO MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15913 of 2009 RAMYATAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15915 of 2009 RAMAYAN RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 20.11.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. All the writ applications are related to common issue with regard to the payment of retiral dues and other dues, as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the common order. It is submitted that grievance of the petitioners has remained to be settled which has not been done as yet despite representation filed by the petitioners. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their grievance, the petitioners propose to file separate representation before the respondent – District Superintendent of Education, Siwan enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the respondent – District Superintendent of Education, Siwan shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the pending grievance of the petitioners could be settled with statutory interest without delay. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)