IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27879 of 2008 DEBU PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 395/397/412 of the Indian Penal Code and section ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the first information report is against unknown, however the informant has expressed suspicion against eight persons who are alleged to have been involved in the crime. It is further submitted that the name of the petitioner does not find place even though the petitioner is a co-villager. It is further contended that the name of the petitioner has been implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused Manoj Pandey and Vijay Paswan. Manoj Pandey has been allowed bail, as stated in paragraph 11 of the petition. It is also contended that during investigation the material alleged to have been taken away by the accused persons were not recovered from the house of the petitioner. Having considered the submissions, as noticed - 2 - above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Debu Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S.Case No. 28 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)