1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2691 OF 2009 Sanjay Chandrakant Parab ...Petitioner Versus The Chief Officer, Navghar Manikpur Nagar Parishad, & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. Milind Parab for the Petitioner Mr. M.S. Karnik i/by Mr. A.G. Damle for Respondent No. 1. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: JUNE 17, 2009 P.C.:- The order of suspension has been challenged in the Writ Petition. One of the grounds taken is that on the basis of this, notice was issued that Subsistence Allowance not be paid. 2. The respondents have filed their reply, and have categorically stated that the Subsistence Allowance is being continuously deposited in the bank account of the petitioner. A statement of account is also annexed to the affidavit. 2 3. Another ground now agitated is that after the suspension order, a charge-sheet was issued, which refers to some different date and number of the alleged bogus certificate, which are not referred in the order of suspension. This is a matter which can be agitated before the Education Officer. 4. The learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has further submitted that the inquiry is already complete, and the report has been submitted to the council. 5. In this view of the matter, we do not find any ground to interfere at this stage. The Writ Petition is dismissed. BILAL NAZKI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.