RESPONDENTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHATTISGARH) WRIT PETmON (s) No. $§9<$ 12009 PETITIONER' /~Khushal Upasrao Ghode, S/o Late Shri Upasrao Ghode, ‘ aged about 55 years, Working ’ as Senior Hor1iculture Development Officer, Govt. Garden Nursery, Pendri, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Agriculture Department D.K.S. Bhawan, ‘ Raipur(C.G.) K2. Upper Secretary, Agriculture Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director Horticulture and Farm Forestry, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Rukam Singh Tomar, Working as Senior Horticulture Development Officer, Govt. ‘Garden Nursery, 'Unjoripali, Tah. Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh (cc) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF D AL CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , / HIGH CGEER’E.‘ OF €E§HATTIS£§ARH AT %ILE$P?JR $3 : EON$$LE SHE JUSTICE PRETENKER DIWAKER W.P.§$§ Ni). 33?3{2{3G§ pE‘w’E‘EGNER Khashal Upasrao Ghocie RESPGNDENTS Stats of QG. €33 Othsrs r WRIT PETITION {INDER AR’HCLE 272$ OF THE COESTI'E‘UTEON OF INDEA Aggearazzc : Shri Anand Shuk1a: counsel for tbs petitioner. Shxi Sumesh Bajaj, GA. “iih Shli Arvmd Dubw, PL, for the State. GRAL 6RDER (13.07.2009) Challsnge m the prsssnt petition is to tho order damd 30.06.3009 (Annaxure Pf 1) issued by tho rospoudom No.2 by which the potitioner who is working as Senior Horticulture Development Of§cer has been transferred from Government Garden Nursexy Pendri, B1ock Rajnamigaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon to the offlce of Deputy Direction Homiculture, District Ambikapur {CG}. Counsel for the petitioner submits that within one and half year the petitioner has been transfeiied agaiva and he is a hanoicapped person, He further submits that the petitioner is depemient upon his family members aild if he is oompeiied to go on transfer he wouid be in great difiicuity. Kw On ihe other hand, counsel for the Siate submits that " let the petitioner make a representation as the transfer * order has been issueii on administrative ground arid in um / 1 the rapresentation wouid be decided by the competent authority cousidwing all the factual aspects of the case, In View of above, The petition 1's disposeKi of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation to the authorities within a period of ten ziays from the date of receipt of this order aJ'Ld 1'11 the eveotuality of making any such representation, the same wou1d be decided expeditiously withm a oetiod of three weeks from the date of its receipt. 3' , Stif- 5 Pritinker Diwaker rK ‘ Judge