Civil Revision No.7042 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7042 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.10.2010 Salim Akhtar Qureshi ....Petitioner Versus Parvesh Kumar and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: - Mr. Gobind Dhanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** GURDEV SINGH, J. CM No.27276-CII of 2010 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CR No.7042 of 2010 Heard. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by Salim Akhtar Qureshi petitioner/defendant No.4 for quashing the order dated 6.10.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula, vide which the application filed by him for appointment of Local Commissioner for physical inspection of the plot in dispute and recording the boundaries thereof, was dismissed. The plaintiff/respondent filed the suit for permanent injunction, restraining the petitioner and other defendants from interfering in his possession in respect of the plot in dispute forming part of khasra No.180 situated in village Bitna Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula, the boundaries of which were fully described by him in the Civil Revision No.7042 of 2010 (O&M) -2- heading of the plaint. The suit was contested by the petitioner. In his written statement he came up with the plea that he is exclusive owner in possession of the plot in dispute. He did not dispute the boundaries of the plot in dispute as given by the plaintiff in the plaint. The application for appointment of Local Commissioner was filed by him on the ground that the plaintiff has mentioned different boundaries of the plot. The application was rightly rejected by the trial court. The Local Commissioner could not have been appointed for the purpose asked for by the petitioner. There is no merit in this petition and the same is ordered to be dismissed. (Gurdev Singh) Judge October 27, 2010 R.S.