1 caf288 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.288 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.32236 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Tushar Bhavsar i/b Pravin Mehta & Mithi & Co. for the Applicant Mr.Dinesh Shah for respondent nos.3-C, 3-D, 3-F & 4 Mr.Sameer Singh i/b Nikhil Salion for R.no.3-B Mr.Abhishek Deshmukh i/b Mr.S.A.Sawant for respondent no.2 CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MAY 5,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 who has opposed the application. There is sufficient explanation for delay of 30 days in preferring the appeal. Hence, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE