[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.4346 OF 2008 IN REVN.APPLN.NO.285 OF 2007 IN C.C.NO.2087/SS/2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.699 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4346 OF 2008 Mr.Harish Jevat Shah ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Amit Jambotkar advocate for applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa APP for State Mr.S.J.Chourasia Adv. i/b Ashoka Law Firm Adv. for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent no.2-complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By judgment and order dated 29.8.2007 in SCC No.2087/SS/2006, the learned Metropolitan [-2-] Magistrate, 13th Court, Dadar, Mumbai convicted the applicant-accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to SI for one month. The learned Magistrate also directed applicant-accused to pay compensation of Rs.90,000/- to the respondent-complainant. Being aggrieved thereby, Revision Application No.285 of 2007 was preferred by the applicant. By judgment and order dated 28.11.2008, the learned Ad-hoc Sessions Judge at Sewree dismissed the said revision. Hence, this application. 3. During the pendency of this matter, the parties have arrived at amicable settlement and they have tendered consent terms which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the consent terms, the matter is compounded and the applicant-accused is acquitted thereunder. 4. In view of the above, Criminal Application No.699 of 2008 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]