IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13324 of 2011 Priyanka @ Pinki Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 5. 19.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party. This is an application seeking cancellation of privilege granted to Opposite Party No.2 vide order dated 9.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36804 of 2010 with some condition. Submission from the bar is that under some confusing state of affairs in the light of order of this court, due application could not be filed before the learned court below and it remained uncared. The bail bond furnished on behalf of O.P.No.2 was also accepted and still O.P. No.2 has been availing the privilege and taking into account the good relationship between the parties and parties are ready to comply the direction of this Court being imposed upon by the aforesaid order. In view of the above, let the parties file due application before the court below on or before 9th November, 2011 and act accordingly. The Court below shall also be careful in future. Let the order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioner to the court below i.e. A.C.J.M., Lakhisarai, in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 74 of 2010. Ravi/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)