IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital : the 11th day of June, 2008 First Bail Application No. 228 of 2008 Criminal Side Sanjay Aggarwal … Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 31 of 2008 Under Sections: 302 I.P.C. P.S.: Kotwali Jwalapur District: Haridwar Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the applicant / petitioner; Mr. Nandan Arya, learned Asst. Government Advocate appearing for the respondent State; and Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate appearing for the complainant. 2. The charge sheet has been filed. On this being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Bail Application form this Court with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned trial court by filing a fresh bail application. 3. Prayer allowed. 4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The learned trial court is directed to dispose of the fresh bail application very, very expeditiously, on its merits and in accordance with law, in the light of the material on record, uninfluenced by any order previously passed by any court. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 11.06.2008 G