^I^Lt -IJ^^ IN THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATnSGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(St No. SS^Of 2009 PETITIONER / : N.L. Verma, Son of Late Mohan Lal Verma, aged about 56 years, R/o. Irrigation Colony Sarangarh, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Versus RESPONDENTS /: 11 State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Water Resources Department,., ^)^^ D.K.S?' Bhawari, G.I ^..^^S<Pf""' Raipyr(Chhattisgarh), ^~'^ .^ .:2) Exeeutive Engineer, A0' .**°' " . k'^ortn-r/' Mantralaya, ..^0" ^''.ft^ y^ ^^••••' . ' Water Resourees Division, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), ^3) Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources Division, Raigarh(Chhattisgarh), :4) Sub-Divisional Officei-, Kinkari Sirsakarya Up-Sambhag, Baramkela, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA afl^iqs^-'t^ tt'KFt •Sff^t IF'^N' ^:_. ^si -ijiAjii;')^, ®-ifl<-i<i®,'fN^roy wmtw^--^-^l^^/-m,iQ^ -ant<fs?w (isifspf^tf) TRiWJt flffiB 3)1^1 SB :HON'BLE 8HRI JUSTICB PIUTIBKBR DIWAKBR 30.07.2009 Shri H.b.Agrawal, Sr. Advoijate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sniita Qhai, P.L. for t4 At the outset counsel for tl present petition with liberty to fi] No.3 raising all his grievances dated 13.7.2009 (Annexure P/10)! authority be directed to expeditiously. Counsel for the State has the petitioner is decided by the with law. Accordingly, the petition is liberty as aforesaid. le State. |ie petitioner wants to withdraw the je representatton before respondent ^ainst his impugned transfer order He however submits that the said the representation so made decitle 110 i+I<iJ<?t^1 --j ^t'Mdf ^ T^^ <f^T<-$i( ^sitosntw objection if the representation of authority concemed in accordance dismissed as withdrawn with the Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge