Q? f-ff^^^ ^ o ,cF . |^° ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C.)No..^3./..../2011 PETITIOENR ^ ^ ..*6lt ^sy^' ^•'" ^^\ <>•" ^^^"\. ^a' RESPONDENT Santosh Kumar Dewangan Son of Shri J.L. Dewangan, aged about 35 35 years, R/o. Village Majarkatta, Tahsil Gariaband, District Raipur (C.G.), VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through State Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^- PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 6951 OF 2011 Santosh Kumar Dev>®ngan Versus RESPONDENT Stateof Chhattfegarh (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India) Singte Bench : Hon'bleShri Satish K. AgnihotFi, J. Present:- Shri Utiam Pandey, Advocate for ttie pet'rtioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) sRDER (Passed on this 24W day of November, 2011) Grievanee of the petittoner is thaton 28.01.2011 (Annexure P-1),.the petitioner moved an application before the respondent for graht of stag^i carriage permit on the route Gariaband to Dhamtari and retum trip ctoity. However, till date, the same has notbeen ctecided bythe respondent Leamed counsel for the petitioner submtts that this petition may Iw djsposed of with a direction tp the respondent to dedde the said applic^tion expeditioysly. l^eamed counsel appearing for the State submits that the appltcartl<?n of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with l^w and on ite own merits, withm a period of 04 weelcsfromthe dsrte of receiptofa copyofthisorder. In view offoregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction tp the respondent to decide the application dated 28.01.2011 (Ann$xur@ P-1), filed by the petitioner within a period of04weeksfromthedateofrecesiRt of a copy of this order. AcGordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ft ashok