IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1191 of 2010 SUMAN SHARMA Versus SUNIL SHARMA & ORS 3 11.08.2010 I.A. No. 5797 of 2010 has been filed for condoning the delay in filing this restoration application. From the statements made in paragraphs 3 to 6 in the interlocutory application, it appears that the petitioner was prevented from reasonable cause for not preferring this application within time. In the above view of the matter, I.A. No. 5797 of 2010 is allowed. Now I proceed to consider the restoration application on its own merit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 909 of 2007, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 18.12.2009. From the grounds taken in paragraphs 3 to 6 of this application, it appears that there were sufficient reasons for omission on part of the petitioner, due to which none could appear to press the civil revision application at the time - 2 - when it was called out. In that view of the matter, this application is allowed and Civil Revision No. 909 of 2007 is restored to its original file and number. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)