ES THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRJT PETITIONN0.23^472006. PETITIONER ..' \^. ^\^- ,^:.;-& Y.--, ...- ^;^<y ^^v .^J^ ^•y'&?-1 ^•"'^' ^lt^ ..• 'o-" P. Simhachalam S/o Shri. Keshav Rao Aged around 38 years, Unemployed Residing at: C/o R.K.Cycle Stores, Adarsh Nagar, Camp No. 1, Supela Post, BHILAI - 490001 Tehsil and Dist. : Durg (CG). RESPONDENTS : VERSUS 1. STEELAUTHORITfOFINDIALTD, Through: Its Chairman, ^ Steel Authority ofIndia Ltd. Lodhi Road, Ispat Bhawan, NEW DELffi-110011. 2. BHILAI STEEL PLANT, Through: Its Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). 3. The Senior Executive, >r (Personnel-Recmitment) Bhilai Steel Plant, BjIILAI-490001 District: Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, NIANDAMUS ETC. •rp XI-HC-22 Siltg'ail t<-<i<*i 311^1 sbd.i* tift^ Barve ^ ^- •t '3^ •^!'tilc'l'!4, 9tti<H'i6, 1«ffliyll< '@l(K ~fl;: an^si^giWHf^t (tf Heard Shri B.P. Rao; couns^l 5y the instant petltjon, the p| directed to consider the case compassionate ground, • The case of.the petitioner isl of the Bhilai Steel PFant, he was pt S-6PQ Grade snd was declareei pt Bhilai Steel P!ant. ThergaSer, the p| The father of the petitioner subr appointmer.t on compassionate grolind No.3 for veriflcation of his edd Accordlngiy, ihe petitioner appea| tssilmoniaiswereverifled.However. Learned counsei for the respondent No.3 be directed to| coinpassionate appointmeni. Praysr macie by iesrnec! ^ •reasonable. Thererere, respondent the petit'oner regarding pQticy of respondent Now.2 regad per'Qd o? -3 months from tnday. With the direction aferesaid, Consequentiy, I.A. No.4759' Parties are entitled for certifi< certifi^d <^l.^!<FR?i^ *ii^^1 ^ f^€t^j^i^ •^ SlfitTT•311^1 °1 forthe petitioner. ptitioner has prayed that respondent No.3 be the petitioner for appointment on the Ithat the petitioner's fatherwas an emplovee 'dsted as Technician (BL), OHERS/RED-1 in irmanent unfit by thc UiedJcal Byard of the ;titioner:s iather was relieved on 12.11.1987. sititted an application for the petitioner for iroilind. The petitioner was called bv respondent lcationa! and pther. relevant documents. tec! isefore tne concerneci offlcer anci his jresponcient No.3 nas not passeci any order. petjtloner sdbmitted that in the circumstances, consider the case of the petitioner for (ounsei for the petitioner Is just, falr snci ^to.3 is directed to decide the appt!cat!o" of compassi<)"ate appointment in acGordsnce with the "ping compassipnate appointment within a |the petition stands disposed nf. 'POOS aiso stands disposed of. copy'of this order. _.._-——"' Sdi- i_.C. B^ado0 jud8e [Tft^ ,^F^^