1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1644 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.874 OF 2004 Rohit Pai .. Plaintiff Versus S.K.Investment .. Defendant and Maya Sawhny & Ors. .. Applicants Mr.Hiren Mehta and Shaikh Yusuf Ali i/b. A.Wani for plaintiff Mr.S.N.Kaikini for proposed plaintiffs Mr.T.A.Bhavsar i/b. M.Bhatt for defendant CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 31st March 2008 P.C. . Heard learned Counsel. Perused the chamber summons and affidavit in support. Considering the relief claimed so also by virtue of the clarifications issued, no prejudice being caused to the original defendant, the chamber 2 summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). However, it is clarified that the amendments would be subject to the bar of limitation and merely because the amendment is permitted does not mean that this Court has pronounced upon the pleas in that behalf. The pleas on merits and limitation of both sides are kept open and amendment is granted subject to the same. . Amendments to be carried out within two weeks from today. Amended copy of plaint be served within two weeks thereafter. Written statement/additional written statement be filed within six weeks thereafter. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)