WPMS No. 680 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to be the owner of khasra No. 279/1 and the writ petition has been filed indicating that the possession was taken over by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for the Kumbh Mela on 30th November, 2009. The possession certificate has been enclosed as annexure-2 to the writ petition which indicates that the possession was taken with regard to Khasra No.279/12 and not with regard to Khasra of the petitioner bearing No.279/1. In view of the aforesaid, the court is not inclined to interfere in the factual controversy, namely possession of khasra No.271/1 was taken and not of khasra No. 279/12. Such factual dispute can only be settled in a suit. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 21.04.2011 Shiv