IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12773 of 2009 GYAN SUMAN @ CHANDAN KUMAR …. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPP. PARTY WITH Cr.Misc. No.682 of 2009 1. UMASHANKAR PRASAD SINGH @ UMASHANKAR SINGH 2. SONALI KUMARI ….. PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPP PARTY ----------- 3 24.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that save and except suspicion, there is nothing in the case to connect him in the killing of the deceased. Deceased was found missing from his house from 9.9.2008. On 10.9.2008, the same was reported without casting any doubt or suspicion against anyone, including these petitioners. But on 11.9.2008, when dead body was recovered, allegation was levelled that there was love affair of the petitioner Uma Shankar Pd. Singh’s daughter with the deceased that was behind the killing and the deceased left his house on call of a girl. No doubt investigation is continuing, but till now, there is no evidence to establish the killing by petitioners. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners are allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today 2 in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 337 of 2008 the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. However, at the stage of framing of the charge all the material collected by the I.O. shall be considered by the trial court justifying the bail so granted to the petitioners. P.K. (Mandhata Singh, J.)