IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1073 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 1073 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 1073 OF 2005 IN IN IN L.A.R. NO. 2 OF 1998 L.A.R. NO. 2 OF 1998 L.A.R. NO. 2 OF 1998 Maharashtra State Road Transport ] .. Appellants Corporation. ](Ori.Acq.Body) Versus 1. Hirabai Vasudev Raut & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Claimants) Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/b M/s. G.S. Hegde & Associates for the appellants. Mr. C.M. Korde, senior counsel with Mr. Milind Jadhav i/b Pravin Mehta & Mithi & Co. for the original claimants. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 14TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . Mr. C.M. Lokesh, the Advocate for the appellants submits that Mr. G.S. Hegde, Advocate is to argue the matter and since he is held up in some other Court, he prays for adjournment. 2. We find no justifiable reason to adjourn the matter. We asked Mr. C.M. Lokesh, Advocate, to proceed with the arguments. He did not do so. In the : 2 : circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Appeal is dismissed accordingly. 4. Upon dismissal of the Appeal, the claimants shall be entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellants before this Court. Sd/- [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. BOBDE, J.] [S.A. BOBDE, J.] [S.A. BOBDE, J.]