Civil Revision No. 1679 of 2010 -1- In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1679 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 8.4.2010 M/s Sarabjit Singh Inderjit Singh and others .. Petitioners vs Renu Chopra .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Mutneja, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the caveator/respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the orders, passed by the learned courts below, whereby eviction order has been passed against the petitioners from the premises in dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has instructions from the petitioners not to press the present petition on merits in case the petitioners are granted one year time to vacate the premises in dispute. Thereafter, they shall vacate the premises in dispute and hand over the vacant physical possession thereof to the respondent. They will file undertaking to that effect before the learned Rent Controller, Nawanshahar on or before 30.4.2010 and also pay the charges for use and occupation of the premises in dispute in advance upto 7th of every month and also clear the arrears. To this fair stand of learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of while upholding the orders passed by the learned courts below and granting time to the petitioners to vacate the premises in dispute on or before 31.3.2011. The petitioners shall file undertaking to that effect before the learned Rent Controller on or before 30.4.2010. This shall be subject to the condition that the petitioners shall pay the charges for use and occupation of the premises in dispute in advance upto 7th of every month and also clear the arrears, if any. It is further made clear that in case of failure to vacate the premises as undertaken or in the event of default in payment of charges for use and occupation, Civil Revision No. 1679 of 2010 -2- the respondent shall be entitled to file contempt petition for violation of the undertaking and in case of failure to file undertaking before the learned Rent Controller within the stipulated period, the respondent shall be entitled to execute the order passed in her favour. The petition is disposed of accordingly. 8.4.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge