IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN IN IN ITS INSOLVENCY ITS INSOLVENCY ITS INSOLVENCY JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION. PETITION PETITION PETITION No.14 of 2006. No.14 of 2006. No.14 of 2006. Re: Shashindra T. Nanu. ..Judgment Debtor. ..Judgment Debtor. ..Judgment Debtor. And And And Ex-parte:- Mandvi Co-operative Bank Ltd. .. Judgment Judgment Judgment Creditors. Creditors. Creditors. Mr. D. R. Talankar, Advocate for Judgment Creditors. Judgment Debtor absent though served. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: D.G. KARNIK,J. D.G. KARNIK,J. D.G. KARNIK,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 16th January, 2007. 16th January, 2007. 16th January, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioning Creditors. None present for the Judgment Debtor. 2. The Judgment Debtor was served personally by Mr. Vinayak Balkrishna Gurav, Supervisor of the Petitioning Creditors on 16th October, 2006. The Judgment Creditor has filed affidavit of Vinayak Balkrishna Gurav proving the service. 3. Despite service, the Judgment Debtor has not filed any affidavit in reply nor even appeared in the matter. Hence the statements made in the Petition are deemed to be admitted. For the reasons stated in the petition, the petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [D.G.KARNIK,J] [D.G.KARNIK,J] [D.G.KARNIK,J]