IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 49 of 2009 (M/S) Zainul Abideen S/o late Sri Abdul Gafoor R/o Patel Chowk, Sahukara Lane, Haldwani, District Nainital. . Petitioner ...………… [ Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Medical Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of Uttarakhand, Secretariat, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. 2. Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad through its Chairman, Prakash Vihar, Dharampur, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. 3. Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad through its Registrar Prakash Vihar, Dharampur, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. 4. District Magistrate Nainital, Uttarakhand. 5. Chief Medical Officer Nainital, Uttarakhand. ...…………. Respondents Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for respondents No. 1, 4 & 5. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of mandamus commanding 2 respondents No. 2 and 3 to register the petitioner as Vaidya / Hakeem. A further mandamus has been sought directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful practicing of the petitioner as Vaidya / Hakeem in the State of Uttarakhand. 3) Petitioner has nowhere disclosed his qualification. It is also not disclosed that what kind of degree is possessed by the petitioner to practice as Vaidya / Hakeem. The only document which is relied on behalf of the petitioner is a registration certificate No. 43313 issued by Ayurvedic and Unani Medical Board, Bihar. The petitioner failed to answer as to how on the basis of said certificate the petitioner has a right to practice in the State of Uttarakhand. 4) Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition is devoid of merits. The same is dismissed in limine. (Stay Application No. 263 of 2009 also stands dismissed). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) [ Dt. January 09, 2009. H.Negi