IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12245 of 2010 SHAMBHU RAUT @ SHAMBHU PAIK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. It would appear from perusal of First Information Report that some accused persons including one, Bihari Kumar were arrested and in huge quantity fire-arms and other materials were recovered. Petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor has anything been recovered from his conscious possession. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the confessional statement of Bihari Kumar was recorded, the said Bihari Kumar disclosed this fact that this petitioner had kept the seized fire-arms. Learned counsel for the state fairly concedes this fact that except the aforesaid material, there is nothing against the petitioner. He further admitted that this petitioner does not have criminal history except one case of dacoity in which as per submission of learned counsel for the petitioner has already been acquitted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of detention, the petitioner, namely, Shambhu Raut @ Shambhu Paik is directed to be released 2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 342 of 2007 corresponding to S. Tr. No. 496 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge (F.T.C.-III), Banka. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)