IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17540 of 2011 Ashok Kumar S/O Sri Ram Nath Brahmchari R/O-Ghasiyar Mohalla, PS-Kotwali, District-Munger. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. Principal Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman, 15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Baily Road, Patna-800001 4. Deputy Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission,15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Baily Road, Patna-80001. ----------- 02. 22.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as well as the BPSC. The Court is not bound to entertain any writ application at any time frame even if it is a stale cause of action. The issue originated on the basis of an advertisement No. 2/96 for filling up the post of APP in the State of Bihar. Recommendations were made by the BPSC and appointments had been carried out as far back as in the year 1999. There were certain rounds of litigations before the Court seeking direction to fill up all vacancies available there but those cases too came to be decided in the year 1999 and 2001. In other words, despite all the disputes which may have persisted at the time of appointment, they came to be settled and appointments made more than a decade ago. Merely because petitioner filed an application under Right to Information Act on 26.12.2009, it does not become a cause of action for this Court to take cognizance of his claim for a 2 direction for appointment on the post of APP on the basis of an advertisement issued in the year 1996. The law is well settled on this score that appointments made on recommendations of the BPSC are not on-going process from year to year or decade to decade. There is no occasion for this Court to give any mandamus or direction in the set of facts noticed above in the earlier part of the order. Writ does not merit any consideration. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)