IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2055 of 2011 SHIVJI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 21.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that the money with regard to ‘Indira Awas Scheme’ of the informant and other were withdrawn by this petitioner and one Badshah Singh. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. does not reflect that how much money was withdrawn and moreover if money was withdrawn on the thumb impression of the account holder by some other persons then the bank personnels are responsible for the said withdrawal. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not the authority either to sanction or disburses the ‘Indira Awas Scheme’ money. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Dawath P.S. Case No. 73 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)