1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6468 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Shri. A.B. Girase, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2010. 1. Shri. R.R. Mantri, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Director of Municipal Administration, by judgment and order dated 27-01-2009 dismissed the appeal of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner would take appropriate steps to challenge the said order. The learned Counsel submits that the petition no more survives now. The learned Counsel, therefore, submits that the petition be disposed of, with liberty to resort to appropriate remedies. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2. Shri. A.B. Girase, learned Counsel for respondent No.3 submits that the petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments. 3. In the light of the statement made above, the petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to resort to appropriate remedies as permissible under law. All issues are kept open. 4. Parties to maintain status quo in respect of subject wall, as on today, for two weeks. sd/- sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] sut/AUG/wp6468.08