IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1164 of 2010 (M/S) Mayank Thaplial (Minor) ………..Petitioner Versus Board of Schools Education Uttarakhand Ramnagar …….Respondent Shri G.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Negi, learned counsel for the respondent. Dated: 08th July, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondent to re- examine/revaluate the answer sheet of Mathematics subject of the petitioner bearing Roll No.051502 for Intermediate Examination, 2010. Further prayer has been made by the petitioner to expedite scrutiny of petitioner’s answer sheet of Mathematics. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was regular student of Class XIIth in the Govt. Inter College, Nagnath Pokhari, District Chamoli and his roll number was 051502. He appeared in the Uttarakhand Intermediate Examination-2010 with the subjects Hindi, English, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner written all answers correctly in all the papers as per his ability. The respondent declared the result of the Intermediate Examination and mark sheet was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner came to know that he got 2 more than 80 marks in other subjects but in Mathematics he got 51 marks, which was wrongly given by the examiners. He also submitted that petitioner is a meritorious student and his academic career is very good. Even in class Xth he secured 87.6% marks in the Board Examination. He prayed that his answer sheet be re-examined/revaluated. As far as re-examination/revaluation of answer sheet is concerned, the same direction cannot be issued in view of the fact that there is no rule which provide revaluation and also in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in (1984)4 Supreme Court Cases 27 Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh BhupeshKumar Seth & Others. Prayer of the petitioner for revaluation is rejected. However, since the petitioner has applied for the scrutiny and deposited the required fee in time, respondent is directed to expedite the scrutiny and declare the result of the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order. The writ petition is disposed of. Interim Relief Application No. 5418 of 2010 also stands disposed of. ( V.K. Bist , J.) Arpan 08.07.2010