,|&3©L£ (S e ,'• y^, / -" /— f^i/. >i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2>oo<^ /2005 PETITIONER <^<- ^fS^- ^^^s3-^"^ ytes0w"'^.J---'"" A^SA-"" RESPONDENTS . .^"'.••".> '}- ^ ?- .'.^-;iFT' ,-*'»; i. .^- 'v, ^..".i S' ^' -y „^ 4-P5» ^^ Cs.v' ><^' .-7 '».t Ku. Seema Mahar D/o Shri Daniram Mahar, aged 30 years, R/o Patwari Office, Patora, P.0. Utai, District Durg [C.G.]. VERSUS 1] The State of Chhattisgarh, through :- the Secretary, Department of 7ribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhaviin, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] The Assistant Collector and Satarkata Officers, District Durg [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA m*i<^i 9»tn^ 3%?t -<iioip)«;yTi)'<i<l&,Rrtiiiy'< i/^ 'f • 30 O^- 1 / " sn'^sTtgTfS'ii* •?TaiT3)I^?Tsl:ntiW an^ST^if) (^rfg^f) ^^200 ^ 18.7.2005 I^A. N0^5873/2005:- This is an application f< AppUcatiori is atlowed. W.P.No.3004 of 2005 Laifrver Heaid Shri T.K.Tiwarij Shri Vivek Sbarma, Paael This petition has been| vaUdity of the unpygned noti^ by which, respondent No.2 district Durg and also beiag has issued a notice for appe^ on 17.6.2005. Leamed counsel for subject niatter of the noticel lias been made against the| false caste certificate ia her service on the post of Patrosjri He fiirther subniits that t4 pardcular person (Scheduleijl district authorily has no ju4s( guidelines of the Supreiue to the speci&ed cominittee co| I have perused the f has been issued for appeara4' .tpi.<ifo<ni *<iinV^'fs'<Il 'jRi'i'yi't /V ^sif^T.an^OT'^ ^ >r urgent hearing. counsel for tbe petitioner and forthe State/respondents. [filed, chaUenging ftie legality aiid t;e dated 8.6.2005 (Annexure P- 1) fseuig Deputy CoUector posted in. ^he district Vigilance Of&cer, Durg, ;4Tance of fhe petrtioner before him tl|ie petitioner subniits that as per it appears fhat soine coniplaiat petitioner regarding issuaace of |favour and also regardiag gettm.^ [trosjri on fhe basis of said certificate. uiquire about the status of a caste aad Scheduled tribe) this ju4sdiction because accordiag to fhe C|ourt, the inatter uiust be referred tistituted for the saine. cobtents of fhe notice. This notice Oourt, •e of titie appUcant on a particular JCL IIH! Ifflllj !J.I ^ ;r m 'l!{g! XI-HC-78 3wi"yiyiriy, yTn'M4!?, fi«i'<i3< 18 <t[*tol^:(TT^ &fe^;':<-^-"^ ^s^^^'y^ ^K' ^^-^y^- s^. sn^sTWi* (icrtg^RE) ^200 notice, issued by the authority as to why the certificate etcj of fhe petitioner may not be • caacelled. It appears to tt(is Court fhat by this notice, the petitioner has been catled T^pon to submit her contentions in fhis regard. ' inclined to entertain this petition. The petition is suuunarily di^iBissed without uotice to the ofher side. tbl'flldfl'l *ll«<riT^'fa'<kxlui'i^it ^srf^tan^r gn^aqiTf^Trai asiTSIl^STsFWP Certified copy as per Sd/- SuniIKumarSinha Judge