1 10wp.3999-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3999 OF 2011 Halya Devu Naik & Anr. ..Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.R.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.A.M. Kulkarni, for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1. .... CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 26th JULY, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for Petitioners and learned Counsel for the Respondents. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the prayer clause (e), the petitioners have made an alternative prayer seeking direction to Respondent No.2 to provide alternate plot of land under 12.5% scheme to the petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 (CIDCO) has submitted that the proposal of the Petitioners to provide alternate plot under 12.5% scheme is pending with the CIDCO and if the petitioners furnish necessary documents in this regard PPD 2 10wp.3999-11 and if the petitioners have not erected any unauthorized structure, application of the petitioners for allotment of the alternate plot, shall be decided within a period of six weeks from today as per the provisions of 12.5% scheme. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners state that the requisite documents shall be furnished as demanded by the CIDCO. 3. On the backdrop of the above referred facts, particularly in view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for CIDCO that the application of the petitioners for allotment of the alternate plot under under the 12.5% scheme shall be considered within a period of six weeks in accordance with law, nothing further is necessary to be done in the present Writ Petition. Same is disposed of accordingly. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (A. R. JOSHI, J.)