-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2671 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8443 OF 2010 Ahmed Gulam Rasul Molapiya & Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corp. & Ors. ..Respondents. AND Azal CHS Ltd. ..Applicant. Mr. Alpana Ghone i/b Shreeram Shirsat for the Applicant. Mr. P. P. Chavan a/w Madhukar Kalzumkar and Mr. Ravindra R. Chile i/b Navdeep Vora & Associates for the petitioners. Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Malankar for BMC. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 28, 2011. P. C. : 1. Civil application is filed by the applicant for intervention in the aforesaid writ petition. Civil application is not opposed by the petitioner. However, same is opposed by the BMC on the ground that in a proceeding under section 105-B of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, society is not necessary party. Be that as it may, the society is formed by the tenement holders on the land belonging to BMC. This land is being re-developed under the provisions of Regulation No. 33(7) of DCRs of 1991. In that view of srp -: 2 :- the matter, I feel that no prejudice will be caused to the respondent-BMC, if the applicant-Society is impleaded as party respondent in the writ petition. In the circumstances, civil application is allowed. Petitioner shall amend the cause-title of petition so as to add the applicant-Intervenor as party respondent. Amendment be carried out within two days from today. Petition to come up on board on 31st March 2011. 2. Civil application stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)