IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2240 of 2011 Narayan Pd. Singh Versus Keshav Chandra Nayak,General M ---------------------------------- 02. 12.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prabhkar Jha for the Bank. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the Bank stating therein that admissible retiral dues of the petitioner have been paid as would be appearing from Annexure- A series. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from Annexure – A series it would appear that a sum of Rs. 1,10, 276.02/- has been adjusted from the retiral dues of the petitioner. However, it is not clear as in what account the aforesaid amount was adjusted. It is further submitted that although the payments have been made, however, it is not clear that as to whether the interest has been made or not on the retiral dues. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that petitioner would be communicated the details of the amount of Rs. 1,10,276.02/- which was adjusted from the retiral dues of the petitioner as also with respect to interest. Such communications would be made to the petitioner within a period of six weeks. Accordingly, the M.J.C. applications stands disposed of. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)