IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50507 of 2008 MD.SHAMSHER, son of Sahabuddin Mian, Resident of Village- kairakado, P.S.- Gidhaur, District- Jamui.----- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR----- Opposite Party ----------- 3 6.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Section 376 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to annexures 4 and 5. Annexure-4 is a Panchayati held for the reason that the petitioner’s father had complained that the complainant’s father had locked his son in the school and was demanding Rs. 20,000/- as ‘Rangdari’. The members of the Panchayat advised the petitioner to file a First Information Report as Md. Khurshid the father of the present complainant had refused to participate in the meeting. Accordingly Md. Khurshid filed a complaint before the police which was accepted on 31.8.2006. On 12.9.2006 the present case was filed alleging that this petitioner had raped the daughter of Md. Khurshid. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury report does not support the factum of rape as it is said that there is no internal injury found on the girl in question. It is further submitted that this case has been filed for misusing and abusing the process of law and, therefore, the petitioner should be granted bail. All these arguments are good grounds for regular bail and, therefore, this Court directs that the petitioner should surrender in the Court below and seek regular bail in Complaint Case No. 813C of 2006 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui. The anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to deposit the cost of FAX for communicating this order to the Court concerned. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)