IN E HIGH CWRT OF TA AT AT 4 AT ANG At 0 E DATFD 1IS 30 D OF JUWE 3998 TE HON’PLE 4R. JUSTICE H.L.DAT1tT’ iT1QN!24 S ri.M1.hafi, S/o. diarne, Aged Major, C/o. D.An’ar, r/o. No•6, 4TG—IT, !<TtB Colony, Sandur 583 119, 3el1’v District. : PflT TONER (Sri.”,H.Sqwkar for Petitioner) 1 The Secxtary, tTnlversity Grant Commission, Bahathir Shah ZarKarg, New Delhi 110 002, 2, The Principal, Sri Prebbu Arts, Science an J•M ohsra Conerce Co11ge, Suraour — 585 24, Gulbarga District, .. I 3 The Secretary, WytlerabacI Karnataka Fducation Society, Gulbarga - 585 102. 4. The irector of Collegiate 1ucation, Seshadri , 8nga1o. : SPODS (Sri.S.Udayashanker, AGA, for I3 & 4) This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constituton of India with an affidavit praying to direct the respondents to disburse the rem 8 iaing balance o’ the salary of the petitioner for the period fran 15?,90 to 1.6.91 according to UGC Scale and etc., This Writ Petition coming on for hearing this day, the Court made the following: 0 RDW . •. 3 -3— ORDER Petitioner in this Writ Petition is staff working in aided private educational institutions. is before this Court interalia seeking directions to the respondents to accord certain service benefits including monetary benefits. In my view, these reliefs cannot be granted by this Court in veiw of the observations made by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. 1833 to 1836/1995 disposed off on 30.5.1998. This Court while considering the issue whether the staff (Teaching and non—teaching). working in educational institutions run by private management can maintain Writ Petitions to claim financial aid from the State Government in the absence of Master and Servant relation ‘and other incidental issues, was pleased to observe that the writ petitions filed by teaching and non— teaching staff of private educational institutions are not -4- are not maintainable before this Court. Respectfully following the çbservations made in the aforesaid decision, this petition is disposed off as not maintainable before this Court for the reliefs sought therein. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the proper forum as suggested by this Court in the aforesaid decision. Ordered accordingly. Sd/-JUDGE. T.y: r. by _I CO !igh urt of Tarnataka Banc1ot? 560 001.