27. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5889/2008 ASHOK DHINGRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Fanish K. Jain, Advocate. Versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sunil Fernandes & Mr. Rajat Jariwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R % 08.03.2010 1. In the present writ petition, notice was issued vide order dated 13th August, 2008. This Court also granted stay subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.50,000/- with the respondent and continuing to pay current user charges. 2. The respondent-discom till today has not filed counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the respondent-discom, however, submits that the impugned bill has been raised in the name of Mr. Ram Kishan, khasra No. 61, village Matiyala, Uttam Nagar, Delhi and not against the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, has submitted that he has a tenant in respect of property located in khasra No. 61, in village Matiyala, Delhi and the meter bearing K. No. 26610B060014 and CRN No. 2660075546 is installed in the premises in his occupation. It is further stated that Mr. Ram Kishan had expired on 20th August, 1996. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the bill is being enforced against him and he shall suffer in case supply is disconnected. 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent-discom on instructions states that the petitioner will be given hearing and thereafter a speaking order will be passed on the contentions raised by the petitioner including the contention that the said K. number and CRN number are for the meter installed in the premises in occupation of the petitioner. The petitioner will be furnished copy of documents and material relied upon by the respondents. He states that the electricity connection in the premises of the petitioner will not be disconnected for ten days after a speaking order is passed. 5. The statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent-discom is taken on record and accepted. The respondent-discom will be bound by the said statement. 6. The petitioner will appear before the Assessing Officer of the respondent- discom on 18th March, 2010 at 2.30 p.m., when relevant documents and other materials relied upon by the respondent will be furnished to the petitioner. The petitioner will file reply, if any, within a period of seven days thereafter. The respondent-discom will pass a speaking order dealing with the contentions raised by the petitioner. The speaking order will not be enforced for a period of ten days to enable the petitioner to ventilate his grievance, if any. It is clarified that it is open to the respondent-discom to take action against the legal heirs of late Mr. Ram Kishan. The petitioner has deposited Rs.50,000/- with the respondent- discom. The said deposit will abide by the speaking order passed. In case the petitioner is held entitled to refund, the said amount will be refunded within seven days of the passing of the speaking order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Dasti to the counsel for the parties. SANJIV KHANNA, J. MARCH 08, 2010 VKR