c^sdY- IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT^BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARH) WRIT PETITION N0. /2004 .^^SSE 16s:t|!Si|S&iaa""'"' ff-:c"""i~" 4.' PETITIONER -<6* s^s^" ^^'•^'..^ .yj^' ^ t,»<" ^^" '^".tJ Smt Vibha Elttedhi, wife of Shri *7L^r </^'4.i ./ ^yj^ Hemaat Kuniar" Elwadhi, aged ,<^S?' about 31 years, occupation - Shikshak Karmi, Class III, Primary School, Gadhwegal, Narayanpur, District Bastar / (Jagdalpur), resident of Old bus stand, Narayanpur, . District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^1^ •K 1. The State of Chhatdsgarh, through : The Secretary, Departinent of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, District Bastar (Jagdalpur) C.G. 3. The Assistant Cominissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Janpad Panchayat - Narayanpur, District Bastar, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh). 4. The Chief Execudve officer, Janpad Panchayat, Narayanpur, District Bastar, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) 5. The Block Education Of&cer, Block - Narayanpur, Distt. Bastar, Jagdalpur^C.G.) ^t^_ ___„„„-___ -_„-_--z.^— sssffWRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLES 2J26/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^•r^":^,. ^^\ -^^% iBtr ."•"sgs?^^^ 3IR?I qiT f<-li+ •sv an^i sh^* Ss sK^W^' ^l'sgStB ^sf '^Wfv}^, 'iS-Aww, fs«ni«^< W.P.NQ.230/2004 •^200 an^T-q^T (ipf^qqtr) TOITWHftasn^T 06.02,2004 Shri A.N.Bhakta, couni Shrj. AHhll Agrawal, State. By thls writ Pet.i.tloni Constitution o£ Indla. pet dated 23.09,2003 (Annexure Offi.cer Janpad Panchayat, the pet.itioner has been re her duty as ShikSMa Karml i Gadhwegal. Narayanpur, Dis; Learned counsel for tj petltioner was selected as contract basis and Immed.i.a1 pet.ltloner proceeded on ma' born to heron 11.02.98. ' undergone a major surgery to take rest and therefore AJ-r" join^ff'her dut-les and 25.11.2002 and Assistant Narayanpur allowed the pet ^i^f^ftT tTTO^ff ^T 1^T^ <r3l^)< ^affipTsn^i Isel for the petitj.oner. P^nel Lawyer for the respondent^ under Article 226/227 of the [itloner has challenged the order P~l) Issued by the Chief Execatj.ve {Tarayanpur Dlstri.et Bastar, whereby ^taained from dlscharging/perfcirming p-lass-III in the Primary School, Itrict Bastar• tie petj.t.Loner sutom.lts that the ;Shlksha Karml, Class-Ill on ths ^•eiy after jolnlng the post, the tiern-tty leave and the chiJ.d was 'hereafter, the petitioner had ^nd tbe pet.i.tioner was advised tb^' ultiitiately t the petitJ-oner could not ^ae the petltioner Joined on C^mmissj.oner Tribal welfare Department, .tloner to joln the duty. However, "S^ -^nw^, W^-Htw, 'iiRTray t •:>TR';TT?I 'Ttf! 3^St liSKl3!' WIP" TOinFt^iaii^r /2/ 'iwreifiift^Tfei^R ^affinsff^r vtde Annexure P-1, the Ex, has not allowed-the Learned counsel for petitioner was inJ.t.i.ally Class-III vide Annexure of one year and thereaftejr for more than 4 years an<3| post, as the original she could not be allowed.l Learned counssl for petitioner may be allowedj respondents No. 1 to 3 & respondents has no object|lon Having heard the lea|r having regard to the factji the petltloner is allowed) raisj.ng all her grievanc^! today to respondents No» No.2 & 3 after conslderi! shall decide the repr eseilt at iQn with a reasoned order. :^cutive Offj.cer Janpad Panchayat tQ join her duties* ^he respondents submits tbat the lappointed as contract teacher Fj-2 in the year 1997 £or a period , the petitioner remained absent now she wants to remaln on that apFJolntment is for one year, therefore. Ithe pet.i.tioaer submlts that the to make a representation to 15 to whi.ch the learned counsel for Irned counsel for the parties an<3 and c-Lrcumstances of the case, to make a detaJ.led representation s within a period of 15 days from 2 & 3 and in turn, respondents all the grlevances of the petitlonsr tatiQn wlthin a perj.od of 30 days of the sarne ln an objectj.ve manner tl9 4 d-a=i •<ii''4i<vi'4, '^flrpre, 'f^fRry w ..,^-.;i-$i?^ k^^^^s ':w''-. y'1' / 3 / The petition is dj.sp4>sed of accordlngly. Consequently, M.W.P.^Io. 203/2004 an<3 I .A.No.593/2004 urgent hearing dlspos^f Certified copy as pe^ rules ^BfWlFT •SDWf 4 ft^t Xi3R?R L.C. Sd/- Judg,