IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 27810 of 2011(A) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SHEELA.N, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.SREEDHARAN, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, VENGAD, KANNUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR-670 002. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL, TRIVANDRUM-695 033. R1 TO R3 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.27810/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE PAY SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO THE PETITIONER IN TERMS OF G.O.(P) NO.85/2011 DT.26.2.2011. EXHIBIT P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.501/2005/FIN. DT.25.11.2005. EXHIBIT P3- THE TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.2596/08 DT.6.12.2008. EXHIBIT P4- THE TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.61/2010/FIN. DT.9.2.2010. EXHIBIT P5- THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DT. 10.10.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................. W.P.(C).NO.27810 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Part Time Casual Sweeper attached to the office of the Krishi Bhavan, Vengad in Kannur district. With reference to the actual sweeping area and the enhancement of the remuneration in tune with Exts.P2 and P4 Government Orders, the petitioner has sought for necessary reliefs, by filing Ext.P5 representation, which is stated as pending consideration before the first respondent. 2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the first respondent to have Ext.P5 considered and disposed of within a reasonable time. 3. Heard learned Government Pleader as well. 4. Considering the limited nature of the relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P5 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, W.P.(C).NO.27810 OF 2011 : 2 : at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. cl