IN THE HIGH COUI?.T OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OP JULY. 201 1 13 E FORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO çgNQ1QL5_L2Q 11 B ETWE EN: I. SRI. MALLANGOUDA S/0 DEVAGOND B1RADAR. AGE: 75 YEARS. RiAT KANNC)LLI VILLAGE, TQ. JAMkIIANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT . SMT. BALAWWA W/O DEVAGOND BIRADAR AGE: 6$ YEARS. R/0 KANNOLLI, TQ. JAMEHANDI. DIST. BAGALKOT. 3. SRI. DEVAGONE) S/U MALLANGOLDA BIRADAR AGE: .38 YEARS. R () KANNOLLI. TQ. JAMKIIANDI. DIST. BAGALKOT, 4. SMT. LALITA W/U DEVAGOND BIRADAR. AGE: 35 YEARS, R/O KANNOLLI, TQ. JAMKHANDI. DIST. BAGALKOT. 5. SRI. RACHAGOND S/U MALLANGOUDA BIRADAR AGE: 35 YEARS. R/AT RSRTC QUARTERS. KSRTC DEPOT, HARIHAR, DIST. DAVANGERE (. SMT. NAM RUTA \V/ () RAC HOUND BI RADAR. AGE: 2$ YEARS, R/AT KSRTC QUARTERS, KSRTC DEPOT. l1ARIHAR. DIST. DAVANGERE 7. SRI. PARAGOUDA S/U MALLANGOUDA BIRADAR AGE: 32 YEARS, RIAT KANNOLLI. TQ. JAMKHANDI. DIST. BAGALKOT i. SMT. RASH MI RESH MA W;’() PARAGOND BI RADAR. AGE 3YLARS,R’A’1 RANNOLLI, TQ. .JAMKHANDJ. DIST. BACALKOT 9. SRI. SHIVAGOUDA S/() MALLANGOUDA BIRADAR \( T E. 2o ‘rEARs R F k\’\NULLI TQ. JAMIKHANDI, DIST, BAGALNOT 10. SMT. SHOBHA 5*Q SHIVAGOUDA BI RADAR A(rE 31 YEARS, R/T KA’NNOI LI TQ. JAM kHANDI. DIST. F3AGALKOT II SANGANGOUDA 5/0 MALLANGOUDA BIRADAR. AGE: 23 YEARS, R1 AT KANNOLLI, TQ. JAM [KHANDI. 01ST. BAGALKOT 12. SMT. ANUSUYYA W/O SANGANGOUDA BIRADAR, AGE l)YEAR R 1 \TRNL\J0LII TQ. JAM RHANDI, Dl ST. BAGALKOT PETITIONERS (BY SRI.MRUTYUNJAYA TATA F3ANGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. REKHA CLAIMING AS W/O NINGANGOUDA B1RADAR AGE: 25 YEARS. R/AT BIDARI. TQ. JAMKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT, PRESENTLY R/AT CHIKKALK1 CROSS, SAVALGI. TQ. JAMIKHANDI. DIST. BAGALKOT . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA 1HROLCH THL UFUINSPECTOR OF POlICE, S\ LGI P01 I F ‘T \IO TQ, JAfvIKFIANDI 01ST. BAGALKOT. .RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.S.KUL1KARNI. HCGP) This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the entire proceedings on the file of -3- the Prl. JMFC., Court, Jamkhandi in C.C. No.7/2011 and the charge sheet filed against the petitoners in C.C.No.07/201 I by the Savalgi P.S. under Section 498A, 324, 504 and 506 of IPC in so far as the petitioners in concern. This petition coming on for 1-tearing Interlocutory Application this day, the court made the following: ORDER Heard. It is seen that there are specific overt acts against all the petitioners in the complaint itself for an offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners cites the Supreme Court Judgment reported in 2010 AIR SCW 4975, Preeti Gupta and another V/s State of Jharkhand and another. However, in the said case alter examination of PWs 1 to 4 since there was no specific allegation against the petitioners. the petitioners have approached the Court. In this case the charge sheet has been filed and the evidence of witnesses is not at all recorded and not even the arguments are addressed for discharge of the accused. 3. Under these circumstances, the decision of the Supreme Court cited by the learned counsel for the 1 petitioners is not applicable to the facts of this case, Hence. the petition is dismissed. JUDGE BS