IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7885 of 2010 Punam Kumari wife of Arunjay Kumar, resident of Village Bisho, Police Station Paraiya, District Gaya…………………………………………....Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3. The Deputy Director, Welfare, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4. The Collector, Gaya 5. The District Programme Officer, Gaya. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Paraiya Block, District Gaya. 7. Ranjita Kumari, wife of Mantu Kumar, resident of village Biso, P.O. Paraiya, P.S. Paraiya, District Gaya…………………….Respondents ----------- 2 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by her non-selection as Anganwari Sevika in the process of selection for the centre in question. It is submitted that the petitioner filed an application before the Commissioner which has been referred to the District Programme Officer for enquiry. However, in the matter of selection or non-selection on the post of Anganwari Sevika and Anganwari Sahayika, remedy lies before the 2 Collector by way of complaint under the Guidelines. Therefore, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a formal complaint before the Collector, Gaya in the matter which shall be considered on merits and decided in accordance with law after hearing the parties. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)