IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44004 of 2010 MD.MANIR ALAM, son of Mastkin Alam Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 208 of 2010 registered under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. Admittedly, informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence, but in her written report she has disclosed that some one had given threatening to her husband using three mobile sets. In course of investigation one Nazir Mian was apprehended and he confessed his guilt disclosing the name of the petitioner. Furthermore, in course of investigation it came to light that one of the mobile sets stood in the name of grandfather of the petitioner, but the aforesaid mobiles set had been taken by 2 the above stated co-accused Nazir Mian. Apart from the aforesaid circumstances there is nothing against the petitioner. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, Md.Manir Alam is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 208 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)