IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2071 of 2009 Decided on : June 23, 2010 Bhoop Ram …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Both the parties say that the matter is covered by a decision of this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Sarab Dayal, CWP No.180 of 2001, decided on 19th July, 2007. However, it is stated by the learned Assistant Advocate General that Special Leave Petition filed against the aforesaid decision of this Court is pending in the apex Court. He says that the benefit of that judgment may be ordered to be given to the petitioner, subject to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Special Leave Petition, filed against this Court’s aforesaid decision dated 19th July, 2007. 2. In view of the abovestated position, writ petition is disposed of, with a direction that the petitioner shall be given the benefit of the judgment in the aforesaid case, i.e. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Sarb Dayal, CWP No.180 of 2001, decided on 19th July, 2007, at the earliest possible, but that benefit shall be subject to the final decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Special Leave Petition pending against the said judgment. June 23, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J