IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision 3478 of 2007. Date of Decision: 28th February, 2008. Brij Khandelwal ....Petitioner through Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate Versus Kamal Kaushal ...Respondent through Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT,J.(ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 30.6.2007 passed by the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh whereby the petitioner has been declined interim stay pending appeal. Notice of motion was issued and dispossession of the petitioner from the tenanted premises was stayed. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the fact that the appeal is now ripe for final disposal, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that interim order dated 19.07.2007 whereby the petitioner's dispossession from the tenanted premises was stayed, shall continue to operate during the pendency of the appeal before the Appellate Authority, subject, however, to the condition that the petitioner shall tender the arrears of rent @ Rs.1200/- per month w.e.f. 1.11.2003, as was directed by the Rent Controller, within one month from today. The tender of arrears of rent and acceptance thereof by the landlord, however, shall be without prejudice to their rights to be settled in the pending appeal. In case it is proved that the rent was not due w.e.f. 1.11.2003, the excess payment, if any, made by the tenant-petitioner would be adjusted towards future rent. Disposed of. February 28, 2008. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE