IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36329 of 2009 CHANCHAL KUMAR @ CHANCHAL PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03. 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner through this writ application challenging the order dated 3rd of September 2009 whereby by petition for discharge was rejected. It is submitted that this matter relates to purely a civil dispute and as such, deserves to be discharged. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submissions of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that while passing the order, the evidence of the two witnesses before charge were taken into consideration who supports the case of the complainant. The court below upon considering the materials on record rejected the application of the petitioner for discharge. Considering the above, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter and the same is accordingly dismissed. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)