IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12208 of 2009 Between: 1 B. Ashok Chary, S/o. Venkata Rajaiah, R/o. H.No. 5-44, Near Bhavani Talkies, Gajwel, Medak District. 2 P. Ramesh Chary, S/o. Laxminarayana, R/o. Vidyanagar, Gajwel, Medak District. 3 A. Raju Chary, S/o. Rangaiah Chary, R/o. Vidyanagar, Gajwel, Medak District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad. 3 Station House Officer, Central Crime Station, Kushaiguda, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Ramesh, Inspector of Police, C.C.S. Kushaiguda, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Station House Officer, Kharkana P.S., Secunderabad. ..... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents : AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners, who are goldsmiths, have alleged that respondent Nos.3 and 5 have been harassing them and interfering with their businesses at the instance of respondent No.4. In the counter affidavit filed by him, respondent No.3 denied the allegations of the petitioners that respondent No.5 handed over the petitioners to him and that he demanded the petitioners to give him 14 tulas of gold. The answering respondent denied the further allegation that he abused the petitioners in filthy language and tortured them physically and mentally. The answering respondent further stated that he never took the petitioners into custody or harassed them by demanding 14 tulas of gold and that no cases are pending against the petitioners in Central Crime Station, Malkajgiri. Having regard to the above mentioned averments contained in the counter affidavit, Sri P.Giri Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the writ petition will be closed with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy in the event respondent No.3 harasses them in future. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.15759 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30th June, 2009. Kl/kvni