THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 11886 OF 2010 Dated 2nd June, 2010 Between: Nallapati Panduranga Rao …Petitioner And The Deputy Superintendent of Police and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.Raja Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 and 2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: ---- The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Certiorari to quash FIR No. 110 of 2010 of Town Police Station, Kodad, Nalgonda District. In the manner in which the writ petition is proposed to be disposed of, it is not necessary to hear respondent No.3. The petitioner had a civil dispute with a third party, which led to initiation of a series of proceedings. In one of the civil suits, respondent No.3 figured as a witness against the petitioner. It is alleged that when respondent No.3 attended the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Kodad, the petitioner caught hold of his neck, squeezed it and abused him in caste name for testifying against him. On the basis of the said complaint, case was registered as Crime No.110 of 2010. The petitioner filed the present writ petition mainly on the plea that the very complaint itself is fabricated and mala fide registered at the instance of his adversary. At the hearing, Sri Koneti Raja Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that as the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home reported that investigation into the complaint is completed and charge sheet remains to be filed, the petitioner does not seek to press the writ petition to the extent of quashing. He has, however, submitted that since the complaint is frivolous and vexatious, the petitioner’s arrest would cause utter humiliation to him in Society. The learned counsel requested that the Special Court trying the case may be directed to consider the petitioner’s case for bail as and when he surrenders. While it is not appropriate for this Court to give a finding on the enquiry of the complaint as the same is required to be decided by the Special Court, I find some justification in the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the facts and circumstances of this case. Accordingly, while declining to quash the criminal proceedings, the Special Court, which is concerned with this Criminal Case, is directed to consider to release the petitioner on bail, as expeditiously as possible, on the latter surrendering himself and on filing an application for bail. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.15000 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 2nd June, 2010 Note: Issue C.C in two days vrn