IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23263 of 2010 MD.TAHSEEN KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has been granted bail by this Court by order passed on 24.6.2010 in Cr.Misc.No.20022 of 2010. One of the conditions set out in the order required the father of the petitioner to stand as one of the bailors. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking modification of the aforesaid condition by reason of the fact that the father of the petitioner is said to have expired on 20.06.2010, just a few days earlier to the order dated 24.6.2010. The modification application has been filed at the instance of the wife of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the circumstances, the order dated 24.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 20022 of 2010 is modified only to the extent that condition No. (a) of the order would read as follows:- 2 “(a) one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner who would file an affidavit indicating his relationship with the petitioner and who would also be under a duty of ensuring the representation of this petitioner in the trial.” The condition No.(b) of the order dated 24.6.2010 shall remain as it is. The modification application stands disposed of. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)