IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10262 of 2008 SHYAM BIHARI YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 27/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf of O.P. No.2 despite valid service of notice. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 498A of I.P.C. That the O.P. No.2 may have chosen not to appear despite notice and declined to go to the matrimonial home even before the court below, is not considered a sufficient ground for this Court to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail in the given nature of the allegations. Obviously, the conduct of the O.P. No.2 emanates from that of the petitioner. His desire of revival of matrimonial harmony is an aspect to be appropriately considered in any application for regular bail in light of the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters and more particularly during the course of trial also. The application stands rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )