IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 OP (FC).No. 3788 of 2011(R) --------------------------- PETITIONER --------------- VINIL P.B,S/O.V.M.BABY PANNIKUZHIYIL HOUSE, ULLANOOR P.O., KOZHENCHERRY P.O., BY ADV. SRI.IYPE JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUJA MATHEW, D/O.T.Y.MATHAI, SUJA BHAVAN, VENMONY P.O.,CHENGANNUR TALUK 689 509. 2. CHIEF ADMINSTRATIVE OFFICER, FAMILY COURT,THIRUVALLA 689 121. 3. THE COUNSELLOR, THE FAMILY COURT THIRUVALLA 689 121. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P(FC).No.3788/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN O.P.(DIV).NO.947/11FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT,THIRUVALLA. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------- O.P(FC).No.3788 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The petitioner is a respondent in a proceeding instituted before the Family Court on 3.10.2011 as O.P(Div).947/11. He says that there is no regular sitting in that court and that the matter may be expeditiously sent for counselling as he has to go abroad. Priorities on individual requirements in connection with employment etc. cannot be taken into consideration in this case having regard to the work load in the station and the lack of officers. The original petition is dismissed without prejudice. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR, Judge. kkb.22/11.