IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 323 OF 2008 IN SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 AMICUS CURIAE ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA AND 45 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Norma Alvares, Amicus Curiae. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. M. Salkar, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents no. 1, 3 to 6. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for respondents no. 8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 19 and 47. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for respondent no. 10. Mr. Antonio Souza Eremita, Advocate holding for Mr. P.A. Kholkar, Advocate for respondent no. 14. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Lotlikar, Advocate for respondents no. 18 and 46. Mr. Deep Shirodkar for respondent no. 27. Mr. Amit Palekar, Advocate for respondent no. 31. Mr. Z. De Souza for respondents no. 33, 35 to 37. Mr. P.A. Kamat, Advocate for respondent no. 42 to 45. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 5th May, 2009 P.C. Learned Amicus Curiae states that Civil Application was moved by her to bring to the notice of this Court various issues arising in the matter. She states that as all the issues have taken cognizance in the main petition, the MCA need not be retained separately. All the other Counsel have supported her in this matter. 2. Accordingly, we dispose of MCA no. 323/2008 as infructuous. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. *am/-