J .s^. •BSSS' HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. BILASFUR WRIT PETmON (St NOZ£..1.?..OF2011 PETITIONER Babulal Sahu, S/o Shri Bhagwano Sahu, Aged about 34 years, R/o ViUage Palsapali Post AgarpLir, Thana and Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ^y ^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1./ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Collector Dantewada, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Panchayat, Dantewada, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. .^ ^ >""<£•••''^ .<YM^ f^^y >'^'^" WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The humble petitioner inost respectfully submits as under: 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS. As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS. ',y^' •~-s' 7 '\'^<\ As mentioned inthe cause title. •^'SSi^ 1 ^.ss»'-"~^y g J S' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITION ('S) N0. 2048 OF 2011. PETITSOSMER Babulal Sahu RESPONDENTS Versus itate of Chhattissarh iners - (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinsle Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. A.Qnihotri, J. "resent:- BnnAwadh inpatni.Aavocaterortne petitioner. Shrl Y.S. Thakur. DeDut? Advocate General for the State. (Passed on this 4'" day of May, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel aDDearina for ths Retitioner submits thaf bv order dated 11/02/2011 fAnnexure P/2) oassed bv the Chisf Executive Officer, District-Dantewada, the petitioner was setected for appointment on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-i! and posted at Uchch Prathm'ik School, Ukaioara, Samiur, Geedam. Thereafter. no apDosntment order has been Issued tiil date and, as such, the petitioner is not in a position tojosn the place of posting. On 18/04/2011 Searned Deputy Advocate Generai was granted two weeks time to seek instructions asto whv after issuance of apoointment ietter daied 11/02/2011 (Annexure Pi'2) posting has not been given to the Deiitioner tiil date. Learned State counsei exoresses inabiiitv that despite communications, he couid not receive any instrucflons. ie that as it may, since the ordsr dated 11/02/2011 has aiready been passed indicating the seiection and the posting of the petiaoner, the Coileci'or, Dantswada, is accordinaSv directed fo !ook into the raatter and ensure that proper order is passed for posting the petitioner, if no other order contrarv to the oro'er dated 11/02.Q011. in be'c-ween. has been oasseei. Accordingiy. the writ petition is disoosed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge