IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4119 of 2011 BISHESHWAR PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 436, 302, 201, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. was lodged in which specific accusation was levelled against one Makub Ansari, the name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of Ajay Kumar Mandal. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that Ajay Kumar Mandal gave a description as to how the victim was killed in which the petitioner participated. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the confession of co-accused has no relevance as there is no eye witnesses to the occurrence. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in vies that petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. and 2 his name only surfaced on the basis of confession of co-accused. With above observation, the application is disposed off in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 143 of 2009 pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)