^:;:^^ s : SiKii'r IN THE HIGH CO'URT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition No. -L75^> _/2002. PETITIONERS V- <Vt^<^^"' (^y^^K ^•^"'^•:''"^ .^^^;^"' '^••''~^^"''Q'V':' ^'^^.-^ . -.-^ 6»i?'- KESpONDEHTS BETWEEN 1 s (1) Secretary, C.M.G.M.C of R.B.H.S. through the D-i-rector Christian Hospital, Mungell. (2) S.K.Mashi, Secretary Through ; I.Ussj.on Hospltal, Baitalpur (3) Dr. Raman Jogi., i'ledical S:updt. and aeting Director, .Jackman Memorial Hospital, BllaSpar, Distt, Bilasp'iir (C.G.). ve r s us ; : (1) presiding Off-i-cer, Labour Court Bilaspur (C.G.). (2) Deputy Labour CommlssJ.oner-, Chhattisgarh Region, Ralpur. (3) vijaya Kumar, President, Mission Hospltal Emploxges Federation, Bllaspur (C.G.). (^) Ramchandra S/o Mukut Ram Near Mission Hospltal, 3ila6pur. ) ©.Bharoshwidow of late Shiv Nirmal Bharosh, Jarhabhata, Bllaspur (C.G.). '6) Gaya Prasad S/o Jawahar Lal, Kiidudand, Bilaspur (C.G.). ^( 7ji/SsuKhnandan Yadav S/o Dwarika PraSad Yadav, near Mission Hospital. Bilaspur (C.G.). ^8) Pradaep Saha S/o Prem Saha, Behind Shepherd School.Bilaspur 9) Guna Yadav S/o Dwarika Prasad Yadav, Near M.i.ssion Hosoital ....contd.. . . 2 (10)/Smt. Aruna Bal W/o Chandra Prakash Near S.B.R. College, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur (C.G.). ,.-• ..^' ^' WRJT PET2TION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF 1'HE CONSIITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSU&NCE pE- tiRCT IN THE NATURE OF CERTJORARI, I.'&NDAI'IUS. ETC. AI-ID FOR APPROPRIATE FURTHER DXRECTION : I 'ief:i^.. h'"\ i:S'!is i^^s, I? S .ES'3" •f^'- .'lfl' ':-lsl,c' HSGH CQURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRST PETITiON N0.1796 OF 2002 PETITIONERS Secretary, C.M.G.M.C. of R.B.H.S. & Others ^ •iii^'i-^ RESPONDENTS Versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Biiaspur &0there (Writ petition underArticie 226/227 ofthe Constitution ofindia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P. Tiwari, counsei for the petitioners. Shri Mateen Siddiqui, counsei for the respondents No.4to 10. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 7t day of October, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, ori instructions. submits that the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which leamed counsel appearing for the respondents has no Qowri 2) !t is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^'(;:.K'!'i-;-;' ?r-~