IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27032 of 2009 PRAVEEN SHEKHAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that even after accepting the complainant’s case, Nilam Kumari, owner of the land was introduced by this petitioner. She entered an agreement of sale deed an amount of Rs. 1,66,000/- was handed over to her. Later on, the transferred deed could not be executed. According to the learned counsel, it was the complainant, who did not take initiative to get the deed executed but in any case he was neither benefited by the deal and really a witness to the agreement of sale deed but apprehending his arrest which in any case cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2613(c) of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kanhaiya Ram, J.M., Ist Class, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)