Crl. Misc. No.M-36536 of 2010 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-36536 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.02.2011 Naib Singh .. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Present:- Mr.D.P.S. Kahlon, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.T.S. Salana, DAG, Punjab. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered against him on 28.06.2010 for the offences under Sections 304-B/34 IPC, at Police Station Sohana, District SAS Nagar, (Mohali). The FIR has been lodged on the statement of one Lakhvir Singh whose sister-Rajni Devi (deceased) was married to Kuldeep Singh son of the petitioner-Naib Singh about one year and four months earlier to the incident that occurred on 28.06.2010. According to the complainant, Kuldeep Singh (son of the petitioner and husband of Rajni Devi-deceased) used to ask Rajni Devi for bringing a motorcycle. Rajni Devi (deceased) informed the complainant about this when she came home. She died by hanging on 27.06.2010. The case before the trial Court is to be established by the prosecution against the accused. The primary demand for motorcycle is against Kuldeep Singh (son of the petitioner). The petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2010. The prosecution has cited 18 Pws and out of them 4 Pws have been examined. The trial in the case is likely to take time. The Crl. Misc. No.M-36536 of 2010 ::2:: petitioner has an unmarried daughter who is aged about 22 years; besides, he has a son who is aged about 20 years. The wife of the petitioner has died and there is no one to look after his children. The case is of an unnatural death in the matrimonial home of Rajni Devi, which is to be established. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner on his furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mohali, shall be admitted to bail. Nothing stated herein shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the learned trial Court shall consider the same on the basis of evidence and material adduced before it uninfluenced by any observation made hereinabove. The criminal miscellaneous petition is accordingly disposed of. (S.S. SARON) February 14, 2011 JUDGE sukhpreet