IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.999 of 2005 In (MJC 1370/2005) Gopal Dutta Shukla, son of late Ram Nath Shukla, resident of village-Bagaura, P.S.-Daraunda, District-Siwan ….. Petitiioner-Appellant Versus 01. N.K.Sinha, Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Patna-1 02. M.L. Jain Clite Accounts Officer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Path, Patna-1 03. The State of Bihar ….. Opposite Parties-Respondents ---------------------------------- 05. 10.08.2011 The present L.P.A. has been filed against the order date 25.7.2005 passed in M.J.C. No. 1370 of 2005, whereby claim of the appellant has been disposed of in view of order passed by the Corporation as contained in Memo No. 393 dated 31.01.2005 and there is a categorical finding that the claim of the appellant was disposed of in the light of the order of this Court, violation of which has been complained. It is also recorded that a copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the appellant and the order further reads that insofar as payment is concerned, learned counsel for the Corporation submits that the same has been paid as per the guidelines of the Apex Court in the Public Interest Litigation in which is has been observed as follows:- “Learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that even the payment has not been made in terms of the representation made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation. It is open to the petitioner to bring this fact to the notice of the High Court and the High Court will take appropriate decision. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of with the above observation”. Accordingly L.P.A. is disposed of. However, if the appellant is still aggrieved by order contained in Memo No. 3250 dated 31.01.2005, liberty is granted to him to avail the alternative remedy available to him before the appropriate Forum. P.K. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)