IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 178 of 2006 (S/B) Dr. Naveen Singh S/o Sri Mahendra Singh, R/o 21 Surya Enclave, Model Colony, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, Through its Registrar. 2. Dr. Satish Chandra, presently appointed as Junior Horticulturist in Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agricultural & Technology, Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……… Respondents Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Judgment Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. Sudhir Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another writ petition with more details and additional material in support of the petitioner’s claim. 3. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, the learned counsel for the second respondent submits that, in fact, the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of making a reference before the Chancellor under Section 23 of the U.P. Agricultural Universities Act. 2 4. Permission granted. 5. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the second respondent also is granted liberty to raise the above objection to the maintainability of the writ petition whenever the petitioner files another writ petition. 6. With the above order, CLMA No. 6625 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 05.08.2006 05.08.2006 G