.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1530 OF 2008 Bhagwandas Chunnilal Kharwa and 2 others. ..Petitioners. Versus Dy.Collector (ENC and Removal), Chembur and Competent Authority and another. ..Respondents. ... Mr.I.S. Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Mandar Goswami, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. DATED : 2ND MARCH, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The petitioners have approached this Court invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court seeking relief in the nature that the petitioners should be permitted to reconstruct dwelling structure which according to the petitioners was protected and the authorities have demolished it without following due process of law and further without providing alternate accommodation and rehabilitation. The petitioners claimed a sum of Rs.5 lakh each by way of compensation for the demolished structure. In .{2}. addition to that, they have also claimed a sum of Rs.50 lakhs for mental and physical harassment and loss of property. 2. The interim relief claimed by the petitioners, based on the pleadings in the Petition, clearly goes to show that it revolves on the issue as to whether the petitioners’ structure was tolerated and governed under the S.R.A. Scheme by the Government. If that is so, the petitioners have an alternate remedy, either to approach the Civil Court or the High Power Committee constituted by this Court in the matter of Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-operative Housing Society vs. Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-operative Housing Society vs. Tulsiwadi Navnirman Co-operative Housing Society vs. State of Maharashtra & others State of Maharashtra & others State of Maharashtra & others reported in 2008(1) BOM 2008(1) BOM 2008(1) BOM CR 1 CR 1 CR 1. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition. We, therefore, dismiss the Petition with liberty to prosecute the option as aforesaid. [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] [J.N.PATEL,J.] .{3}. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]