IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2011 / 27TH POUSHA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1244 of 2002() ------------------------------------ CC.174/1999 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, CHITTUR .................... PETITIONER(S): DEFACTOR COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------------- RAJAMANY S/O.KUPPAMUTHU, ALAMPOTTAYIL, THALAPPILLY VILLAGE, CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKADU DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN SRI.S.SHYAM SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): ACCUSED AND STATE ---------------------------------------------- 1. SATHEESAN S/O. VASUDEVAN, ADICHIRA, ELANADU, THRISSUR. 2. VASUDEVAN S/O. CHATHU, DO. DO. 3. JANAKI W/O VASUDEVAN, DO. DO. 4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOZHINJAMPARA POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-31. R1 TO R3 BY ADVS. SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN SRI.P.RAMANKUTTY R4 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs P.S. GOPINATHAN, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.1244 of 2002 --------------------------------------- Dated this 17th day of January, 2011 ORDER The revision petition was filed by the de facto complainant in C.C.No.174 of 1999 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thrissur against the order of acquittal under Sec.248(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Adv. Sri.R.Arun, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition is not pressed. The submission is recorded. The revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. (P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) Sbna/-