/•<" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (C.G.l WRITPETITIONfONO. "^2 ^,'2-/ 2011 PETITIONER •\0)^^3^ ^^v";::;..-:- '^•""..-..'y" .--^"- '^s^\^1 .A. ..-•**'' ^ ' «RESPONDENTS Chandrashekhar Patel S/o. Shri Komal Prasad Patel Aged g^gut 42 years, R/o. PatthalgoartgTailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES ^f6 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA 3II^i VS h-tt'* W WRI »H|<» ueepti 'S^ '^WM<t. Bxtltl'Ko, fadlti^ ?^ *1WP1T t»*fftt» >..'/^..:;...'f:R£Ait) ' ffl.200 an^i^ra^ (•'pigpi^ti) TCIW ^ifta aii^i SB: Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohdn Shrivastava. J. 02-12-2011 ShriSaurabh Dangi and MsJ Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the Stat^ ^)i<rf<a<ft*t ^TOcff "^f 1%^ <f<fl-t^i< ^sifinaii^i Bulbul Agrawat, counsel for the petitioner. Advocate General along with Shri Arun Sao, Learned counsel for the parfes submit that an order has been passed in the identical cases arising from the ^ame area and on account of simitar notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Lailunba, Raigarh. Not disputed. | Accordingly, this writ petiti^n is aiso disposed off on the same terms. However, the Nagar Panchayat w(ll not take any acnon without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the pers4n concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorize^ dispute, before passing the ordej concerned. or unauthorized structure, as the same is in \, after considering the cases of the persons Manin Sbrb/astava lud&e !ira^tTiNili;"iidi, -rS/140—1/2011— i.su,ooa. ;'"^ H ^ s!s 8vsH^i ES -i-