IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1591 of 2006 RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.07.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Advocate General for the State. Learned Advocate General very fairly states that the order passed in compliance of the order of this Court on the writ petition does not adequately cover consideration of the petitioner for regularisation under the policy decision dated 1.8.1985 as modified on 10.5.2005 and that the authorities may be given an opportunity to pass a fresh order after considering the case of the petitioner under the aforesaid policy only. Let the same be done positively within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The contempt application stands disposed accordingly. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)