IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.27 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8101 OF 2007 Pune Mahanagar Pariwahan Mandal Limited ... Appellant Versus Ganesh Govind Golande and others. ... Respondents Mr. S.K. Talsina, Senior Advocate i/by Mr. R.M. Pethe for the appellant. Mr. M.P. Thakur, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.48. Mr. K.S. Bapat for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C. J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 8TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. Being aggrieved by an order dated 30th August, 2007 passed by the Industrial Court at Pune, writ petition No.8101 of 2007 was filed. 2. The learned Single Judge while disposing of the said writ petition treated the same as filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India though in the petition, the original petitioner had stated that petition was filed under Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge dated 12th August, 2008, the appellants-original petitioners have approached this court under clause 15 of the Letters Patent. 4. In our opinion, the view taken by the learned Single Judge that the petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and we also consider the same to be the correct view. 5. In the circumstances, in our opinion, this appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is not maintainable and, therefore, the same is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.