WPMS No. 1735 of 2008 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Sri D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri L.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Vinod Nautiyal, learned Additional Advocate General for respondents no. 1 and 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned recovery notice dated 22.09.2008 (copy annexure 11 to the writ petition), whereby the petitioner is required to deposit Rs.4,32,573/- by 4th October 2008. Perusal of the writ petition and the annexures filed thereto shows that petitioner had admittedly taken loan from the Punjab National Bank, Branch Imlikhera, Dharampur, Roorkee-respondent no. 2. It is also not disputed that the petitioner failed to make the repayment of the loan. When the recovery proceedings were drawn against the petitioner, he earlier filed Writ Petition No. 03 (M/S) of 2007, which was disposed of permitting the writ petition to deposit the amount in six equal quarterly instalments. It appears that the petitioner failed to repay the loan even after being permitted to make the payment in the instalments. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned recovery notice. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Interim Relief Application No. 6469 of 2008 also stands dismissed). (P.C.P., J.) 30.09.2008 NS