IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.230 of 2009 SHAMBHU PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS 5 29.4.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite party no.10. The instant revision application is directed against the order dated 20.12.2008 by which cognizance of offence has been taken under section 376/506 of the Penal Code and section 3(10) of the SC/ST Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant case has been filed by a fake lady describing herself as Mamta Devi wife of late Baliram Paswan of village Rajauli, P.S. Rajauli, District Nawadah. He further submits that the aforesaid fact would be evident from the final report submitted by the police. In the final report the police has described the informant as Mamta Devi @ Meena Devi. Notice was issued to Opposite party no.10 who has appeared through her counsel. It is submitted on her behalf that she has not filed any case against the petitioner much less by the name of Mamta Devi. In view of the fact that the case was instituted by a false name, I think it would be an appropriate case in which the police should make further investigation under section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. and submit a report within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the learned court below. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this - 2 - KHAN application stands disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the Special Judge, Nawadah in connection with Special (Harijan) Case No.1 of 2009 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (S.P.Singh,J)