VERSUS Srat. Smita Paadey, W:ile of Saiitosh^ Paadey, aged 29 yeai's, resident. of SlUiapara, Baaupratapur, Distiict Kanker(C.G.), State of €h]iattisgarh flirough the Secretan', Deparunent of Honie Affairs, Dau Kalyan Siagh Bhawan, Saipur (C.G.). Supermtendent of Police, Distt. Saipur (^/.\^,). Station House Officer, Mahila PoHce Statk)n Rajpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). E^Q.T '.£&X"r'&rf£^'-es.&. •i-S>rt-»?^1^^ |iS®n£&6JAg, g^AS £i1?J •£dgEAAgA£E;^s| Present Shri Anil ''i''npatni, Acivocate xor tiie petitxoner. Shri Rajendra Tripathi, P.L. for the State, on 24/7/2009) x. This is a petition for seekiug direction to fhe respoudei iEivestigation on the basis of icport niade by the petitioner, Leanied coun.sel for the petitioner subiaits that at the instance of peutioner Raipiu- poUce has registered the ofEence ia crune y0. 0/07 but fhey are not urvesugating the offeace and has tE'aiisferred tiie dian' to Indore. 2. The F'irst Information Report reveals that PoUce has iaitiated iavestigatioa at Raipur accordiag to tlie conteats of First Ii-i&rmation Report azid written compliaiit substaiitial part of flie cause of action arose at Iri.dc.re aad Bhaiizipratappur aad one part arose at Raipur white applicajit was going to Bhaiiiipratappiir froia Puna aiid sbe stayed iii fhe liouse of Biia at this stage prosecutioa lias not coiapleted the iavestigation petitioner has not ffled 'die inaterial to sliow police has transferred fhe diaiy to Iiidore, ui absence of such facts, I do not find aay gi~oiind for ititerierence. Consequently, petitioa is liable to be dismissed aad it is hereby disiaissed. Sd/- T.P, Sharma Judge