(O IN THE HIGH COURTOFCHHATnSGARHAT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) fi0.€3%QF 2011 PETmONER / ^^:\'^ ^•-- \v RESPONDENTS / Vinod Kumar Thwari, S/o^ Late Ram Narayan Tiwari, aged about 50 years, Occupation-Service. presently posted as Sub-lnspecdor fTransport), Check Post- Wiamarpali (Bhagat Deori), DistricA Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deparfrnent of Transpprt, D.K-S.Bhawan, Mantrayafa, Raipur, District Raipur 2. "The Commissioner fTransport), New Bus Sfand Premises; Pandri, Raipur(CG) 3. The Additionaf Commissioner (Transport), New Bus Stand Premises, Pandri, Raipur (CG) 4. The District Transport OfRcer, Mahasamund (CG) WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 228 O^THE CONSTITUTiON OF II The petitioner, above named, rnost humbiy and respectfutfy begs to submit as under: - \ ! Detaitsofthe Detition: - llt. ::-..;.^.t~-ir3-». \^' (S HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BTIASPTJR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S') No. 6346 of2011 Vinod Kumar Tiwari. VRRSIJS RF.SPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE. CONS'1'ITUrTON OF IN-DIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhadm'i, Pauel Lawvot' forthe State/respondotits. ./Pnt.ca^ nn fl4th 'IC-T nfT-Tnmmhff- 'Jf\l, 11 ^X a*?^^lu Oil u-t ua.j <JA iiiVVs./AUUi/i, AVAi.^ 1. Leamed couasel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view ofthe fact tbat W.P(S) No. 2470 of 2010 (VinodKumar Tiwari v. State of Chhattissarh & Others) has alreadv been dismissed as withdrawn, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and this petition has become inlhictitous. 2. Leamed counsel appearine for other side does not controvert tfae above submission. 3. In view offhe above, this oetition i.s disiTiissed as having beeome iirfhictiious. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt