:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2777 OF 1984 NO. 2777 OF 1984 NO. 2777 OF 1984 Wander Limited. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay & ors. ... Defendants. None for the Plaintiffs. Mr. U.J. Makhija with P. Khandhar i/b. Mulla & Mulla for Defendant No.1. Ms. N.S. Somnani i/b. Bhatt amd Sakhare for Defendant No.2. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 20TH 20TH 20TH OCTOBER 2008. OCTOBER 2008. OCTOBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Suit was filed in the year 1984 and this Court noticed on 25th August 2008 that the Advocate for the Plaintiffs had obtained discharge from the proceedings far back in 2004 after informing the Plaintiffs. 2. Despite this position, the Office was directed to issue notice and in pursuance of the orders passed on 25th August 2008 and 22nd September 2008, the Office notice was issued to the Plaintiffs. That packet is received back with the remark that the Company is shifted to some other place. There are no other premises which would indicate the registered Office of the Company. However, before the Advocate obtained discharge, he served a Notice to the :2: Plaintiff at this very address. 3. Under these circumstances, no useful purpose will be served by keeping this Suit pending. The Advocate has already issued one notice to the Plaintiff - Company but it has not taken any steps to proceed with the Suit. 4. The Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want prosecution (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)