IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 14-12-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.27681 of 2010 M/s.Asahi India Glass Ltd., Plot No.F 76 to 81, SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irungattukottai, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District, Rep. by its Plant Head. .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Chief Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Kanchipuram Taluk Police Station, Kanchipuram. 4.The Sub-Inspector, Arakonnam Police Station, Arakonnam. 5.The Sub-Inspector, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Sriperumbudur. 6.M/s.Mohan Associates, No.126, G-3, Sudhirs, 3rd Main Road, Purushothaman Nagar, Chrompet, Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7.M/s.Updater Service (P) Ltd., No.7-21, Sakthi Garden, Next to D.B.Jain College, Hostel Road, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Thoraipakkam, Chennai. 8. M/s.Vari Enterprises, No.262, Poonamallee High Road, Aminjikarai, Chennai. .. Respondents. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 herein to provide adequate security within the company premises and its surrounding area situate at Plot No.F 76 to 81 SIPCOT Industrial Estate, Irungattukottai, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District, for avoiding and preventing the happening of the any untoward incidents by the employees of the respondents 6 to 8. For Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Ravichander For Respondents : Mr.S.Gopinathan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R5 Mr.C.Jagadish (R6)for Mr.V.Balu (R8) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 04.12.2010, is directed to be disposed of by the fourth respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the fourth respondent is directed to provide the necessary protection to the petitioner, taking into consideration the representation of the petitioner, dated 4.12.2010, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondents 6 to 8 and to the other parties concerned, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 4.12.2010, to the fourth respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Sd/ Deputy Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To 1. The Secretary, State of Tamilnadu, Chief Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Kanchipuram Taluk Police Station, Kanchipuram. 4.The Sub-Inspector, Arakonnam Police Station, Arakonnam. 5.The Sub-Inspector, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Sriperumbudur. 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.89576 1 cc To Mr..D.Ravichander , Advocate, SR.89507 1 cc To Mr.C.Jagadish , Advocate, SR.89482 Writ Petition No.27681 of 2010 bk(co) pmk.24.12.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/