HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. 35810F 2011 PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS VEiRSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Janaki Sidar W/o Bharat Lal Sidar, Age 31 Years, Vilk^e Nagraiauda, Distt. Raigarh, CIihatdsgarh. State of Chhattisgrh Through Secretaiy, Departm.ent of Land & Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. State of Chliatdsgarh Through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chliattisgarh. Secretaiy, Revenue Board Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. CoUector Raigarh CoUectorate, Ra^arh, C.G. Sub Divisional Oflucer Ghaighoda, Ra^arb, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 FOR IS8UAMCB OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR AMY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION OR ORDER. (8B :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Ms. SudhaBharadwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State. OftDESt (Passedoa 21/09/2011) 1. By this petidon under Article 226/227 offtie Constitution of India petitioner bas prayed for location/reconstruction of the record of revenue case which is not available with the Board of Revenue or wifh CoUector and prayed for issuance ofwrit in foUowing tenns;- (i) Issue a writ of inandainus directmg the Respondents to locate/reconstruct the records, and dccide Revenue Case No. 13/A-23/2000-01 State of Chhatdsgarh v. Jhadu Singh & Janaki Bai ffled under Section 170B of Chhattisgarh Laad Revenue Code aud pendiag before Respondent No. 5, the SDO, Gatgora, Raigarh niost expeditiously, within a speci&ed tune fi-ame. (ii) Direct an enquiry iato how the Case No. 46/A-23/2003- 2004 was adinitted and reinaiaed pendiug before the Respondent No. 4 Collector, Raigarh for 7 years without ^- ttie AppUcant having s^ned the AppUcation, Vakalatnama, Meino of Appearauce, or haviag been piesent fbr any hearing whatsoever without aufhorily fhrough Vakalatnama aad how Advocates appeared on behalfofsuch au AppUcaat wifhout any authority. 2. It is unfortunate fhat in stead of prayiag for reconstruction of record to concemed authority petitioner has filed fhis petition. Consequenfly, petition is disniissed sununarily. However, petitioner inay apply before the coiupetent Rcvenue Court for rcconstruction of the record aud also submits thc copy of the documents aad ofher papers avaUable wifh her. No order as to costs. Sd/- -T.p.Sharma judge •^