CWP No.17883 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17883 of 2008 Date of decision: 07.09.2011 Karamjit Sandhawalia and others ....Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab, and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Karam Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for the parties have fairly stated the revenue authorities have to carry out entries in the revenue record as per the judgment of competent civil Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that civil Court has already decided the lis between the parties vide judgment dated 14.11.2006 (Annexute P-10), therefore, respondent No.4 be directed to carry out entries in the revenue record strictly as per the judgment of the civil Court. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 states that respondent No.4 be directed to hear the parties before making any entries so that respondent No.5 may point out as to whether judgment of the civil Court is upheld by the superior Court or has been set aside by the superior CWP No.17883 of 2008 -2- Court. In view of the above statement, present petition stands disposed of with the direction to respondent No.4 to make entries in the khasra girdawri as per the judgment of the civil Court (Annexure P-10). Respondent No.4 shall hear respondent No.5 to say whether this judgment is still good or has been set aside by the superior Court. (Alok Singh) Judge September 07, 2011 R.S.