CWP No. 918 of 2004. 28.02.2008 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that as far as payment of electricity demand is concerned, the payment has been made. Therefore, the main prayer has become infructuous. Further the learned Counsel for the petitioner wants to approach the appropriate authority as far as the damages are concerned. The same is always open for the petitioner. With these observations the writ petition stands finally disposed of with the consent of the parties. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. February 28, 2008. (Deepak Gupta), J. (rc)