IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.2500 of 2009 ==================================================== DINESH KUMAR SINGH - Petitioner/s(s) . Versus BHUPENDRA NARAIN MANDAL UNIVERSITY & ORS- Respondent/s(s) . ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. RAGHUNATH KUMAR For the Respondent/s: Mr. HEMENDRA PD.SINGH Mr. ABHYA KUMAR ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA DATE: 11-07-2011 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 03. 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the B.N. Mandal University. The petitioner is alleged to have been a regular student in the subject of Music in the Session 1994-96 at the T.P. College, Madhepura, stated to be affiliated to the B.N. Mandal University. It is alleged that he appeared in the M.A. Arts examination for the aforesaid session in the year 1997, but his result has not been published. It is submitted that the Answer Books were evaluated and the marks awarded but still the 2 result have not been published. For a candidate who has appeared at an examination, the results are a most eagerly awaited item. The petitioner appeared in the examination in the year 1997 and woke up two years later in July 1999 for the need of his Mark-sheet. There is no other material on record except a bald pleadings that he has taken steps prior to the same. He renewed his relief on 13.2.2000 and then again went to sleep till he claims to have made an application on 11.8.2006. He claims that he again met the officials of the University on 2.9.2008. The Court cannot loose site of the fact of the manner in which the petitioner appears to have conducted himself wholly not in consonance with the anxiety of an examinee for an early eliciting of his results. The Court cannot loose site of the fact that long years have also passed. To fault the respondent alone at this stage shall not be appropriate. The petitioner must bear a part of the blame also. He is therefore left to his fate to pursue matters with the University authority when it is expected that if 3 he was a candidate and appeared at the examination the University shall make necessary endeavours to examine issues by sparing sometime for such old records and attempt to inform the petitioner at an early date, which the Court may reasonably only opine as six months. The application stands disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J. )