1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)Nos.11112 to 11125 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 & 1 of 2011 R. SUBRAMANIAN ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11112 of 2011 N. PERUMAL ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11113 of 2011 S. RAMESH ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11114 of 2011 P. KANNAN ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11115 of 2011 A. SIVAKUMAR ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11116 of 2011 A. SADIK BADSHA ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11117 of 2011 C. BALRAJ ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11118 of 2011 P. NANDHINI ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11119 of 2011 P. TAMILSELVI ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11120 of 2011 N. MAHADEVAN ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11121 of 2011 A. THATHAKEER ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11122 of 2011 A.T. ANSARI ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11123 of 2011 K. SHANSHATH ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11124 of 2011 T.R.P. VIJAYAKUMAR ..PETITIONER IN WP(MD)No. 11125 of 2011 VS., 1. THE COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF TRICHIRAPPALLI, CONTONMENT, TRICHIRAPPALLI. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRIRANGAM DIVISION, TRICHIRAPPALLI CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SRIRANGAM, TRICHIRAPPALLI. ..RESPONDENTS IN ALL WP's https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the final notice in Na.Ka.No.A1/11091/09/Sree dated 16.08.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents herein to comply with the request made by the petitioner in the representation dated 04.08.2011 so as to enable to make the petitioner to comply with execution of lease agreement on Rs.20/- non judicial stamp papers and to commence the tenancy. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.P.Srinivas COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.A.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.P.Srinivas, learned standing counsel for the respondents / Corporation. 2.By consent, the Writ petitions itself are taken up for final hearing. 3.The petitioners in all these cases are successful bidders in the auction conducted by the respondent/Municipality and they have been allotted shops in the month of January/February 2011. According to the respondents, after the allotment of the said shops, the petitioners are defaulting in payment of rent. Hence, the 2nd respondent by an impugned notice dated 16.08.2011, demanded payment of arrears of rent for the said shops, allotted to the petitioners. The petitioners dispute the allotment of the shops stating that they have not signed the agreement. The petitioners further contended that certain facilities have not been provided. Hence, the Writ petition. 4.Mr.Srinivas, learned standing counsel for the respondents stated that the petitioners were allotted the shops and many of them are presently running the shops and their earliest grievance is that the rent fixed for the said shops is high. He disputed all the contentions raised by the petitioners. 5.Having considered the rival contentions, this Court is of the view that the facts, which are urged by the petitioners, and disputed by the respondents, cannot be considered by this Court. If the petitioners are aggrieved, they may approach the appropriate Civil Court for such relief as may be advised. The learned counsel for the petitioners thereafter, submitted that the 1st respondent / Commissioner may be directed to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 04.08.2011 and did not canvass the larger relief sought for. 6.In such view of the matter, considering the plea as above made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, 1st respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 04.08.2011 said to have been submitted by the petitioners, on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 petitioners and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioners' claim. The Writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. Consequently, connected M.Ps.are closed. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( RTI Act ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR nbj To 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Trichirapalli, Cantonment, Trichirapalli. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Srirangam Division, Trichirapalli City Municipal Corporation, Srirangam, Trichirapalli. 14CC TO MR. A. SARAVANAN, ADVOCATE, SR: 33826 TO 22839: DM:2011:SEPTEMBER:29:: W.P.(MD)Nos.11112 to 11125 of 2011 28.09.2011 3P:17CC'S https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/