IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 Cont.Case(C).No.1490 of 2005(S) --------------------------------- ------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.19774/2005 DATED 24/08/2005 .................... PETITIONER:- ------------------ MERLIN USHA (MRS), W/O. SRI.THOMAS, AGED 53 YEARS, HEADMISTRESS, ST.MARY'S H.S.S., VIZHINJAM, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.JAMES VINCENT RESPONDENTS:- ------------------------ * 1. JAMES JOSEPH, S/O.SHRI JOSEPH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, TRIVANDRUM. (SUBSTITUTED) SRI.V.KARTHIKEYAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS IS SUBSTITUTED AS 1ST RESPONDENT IN PLACE OF SRI.JAMES JOSEPH AS PER ORDER DT.20/3/07 IN IA 61/07 *** 2. FR.E.WILFRED, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, CORPORATE MANAGER, R.C.SCHOOLS, VELLAYAMBALAM, TRIVANDRUM-3. (DELETED) (THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS DELETED AS PER ORDER DT.20.3.07 IN I.A. NO.61/2007) **** ADDL. 2. FR.E.WILFRED, AGED 47 YEARS, CORPORATE MANAGER, R.C.SCHOOLS, VELLAYAMBALAM, TRIVANDRUM-695003. IS IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 16.10.07 IN I.A.NO.564/2007. Cont.Case (C).No.1490 of 2005-S - 2 - ** ADDL.3. SRI.JOHN BENJAMIN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL.3RD RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 20.3.07 IN I.A.NO. 61/07. R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.M.Joseph,J. ------------------------------------------------ Cont.Case (C).No.1490 of 2005-S ------------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 8th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. Sri.S.James Vincent, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requests this Court to permit him to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to file an appropriate fresh contempt petition against all the respondents and also some other persons. (2) Permission sought for is granted and the contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (3) Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file an appropriate fresh contempt petition, if she so desires. (4) In view of the order passed in the contempt petition, no orders need be passed in I.A.No.270 of 2007. Accordingly, the said application is closed. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice K.M.Joseph Judge vku/-