CWP (T) No.13953 of 2008. 19.11.2009. Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Advocate, for respondent No.5. The petitioner was appointed against the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) by the Parents Teachers Association. He served against this post upto 30.10.2003. A regular hand joined on this particular post. Thereafter, he was engaged against the post of Language Teacher. He worked w.e.f. 1.10.2003 to 7.7.2006. The Executive Council of the Parents Teachers Association took a decision on 5.7.2006 to engage a candidate, who is professionally qualified as a Language Teacher. Consequently, the Executive Council has appointed a teacher against the post of Language Teacher, who was MA in Hindi with B.Ed. The decision has been taken by the Parents Teachers Association. There is no illegality in the decision of the Executive Council of the Parents Teachers Association whereby a qualified person as per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules has been recruited as TGT (Arts). The petitioner was not in possession of B.Ed qualification. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. 19th November, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)