IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 13845 of 2008 Date of decision:- 27.5.2008. Gani ...Petitioner. Versus The Senior Supdt. of Police, Ludhiana (Pb.) and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr.H.P.S. Aulakh , Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. This is a petition for direction to respondent no.2 to investigate the complaint dated 14.4.2008 (Annexure P-1) and register the case in accordance with law on the basis of allegations made in the complaint. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner made an application dated 14.4.2008 (Annexure P-1) to the respondent no.2 but no action has been initiated against the culprits. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for registration of FIR could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. May 28, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE