THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Civil Revision Petition No.5718 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner is defendant No.8 in O.S.No.661 of 1989 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovvur. He is aggrieved by the orders in final decree proceedings for allotment of Item No.2 of the plaint schedule property, which has been purchased by him from defendant Nos.1 to 3. Admittedly, the trial Court as well as the appellate Court have upheld the claim of the petitioner that his father purchased the property under Ex.B3, sale deed, from defendant Nos.1 to 3 and a direction was given to adjust the equities. However, ultimately, it is defendant Nos.1 to 3, who has to be provided shares as per the decree. Therefore, the trial Court rejected the request of the petitioner. Unless and until the said property is allotted to defendant Nos.1 to 3, the petitioner cannot step into the shoes of the defendants. It is after such allotment, the petitioner can claim adjustment. Therefore, I do no see any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference with the impugned order. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the trial Court to take into consideration such adjustment in favour of the petitioner, after allotment of the subject item in favour defendant Nos.1 to 3. No costs. _____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dt.05.08.2010 VGB