IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 801 of 2009 (O& M) Date of decision: 31.8.2009 Ms.Satya Wanti, Lady Constable ......Appellant Vs. The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY PRESENT: Mr.Bhag Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. **** ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (Oral) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 20.8.2009 dismissing the writ petition. 2. The grievance of the appellant was that she should have been considered for promotion in accordance with Punjab Police Rules, 1934 and deputed for B-1 Course. Promotion of Constable to the next higher post is to be considered from two categories; i) seniority-cum- merit category ii) merit- cum- fitness category. There is 55% quota for the first category and 35% quota for the second category. The appellant was not selected under 55 % quota category in which two other candidates were selected. However, no consideration took place under 35% quota category. 3. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition with the observation that no one junior to the appellant had been given promotion under 35% quota. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. LPA No. 801 of 2009 [2] 5. Only grievance which has been put-forward now is that representation of the appellant (Annexure P-4) should be directed to be considered with regard to consideration of candidates for 35% quota. 6. Without expressing any opinion on merits, we direct respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representation of the appellant in accordance with rules, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The appeal is disposed of. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE (DAYA CHAUDHARY) August 31, 2009 JUDGE raghav