1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.54/2011 Ramrao Rajaram Lohakare and another ...Versus... Smt. Suman Shrivallabh Tilak and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri V.A. Kothale, Adv. for appellants] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 04.10.2011. The matter was heard on merits on the last occasion. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. The original defendants/appellants have put to challenge the judgments and decree made by the two Courts below concurrently in the matter of the suit property. There is concurrent finding of fact recorded by the Courts below that in an unauthorized manner the original defendants/appellants had obtained lease without concurrence or consent or knowledge of the original owners, who filed the suit for possession of the suit land. None of the defendants produced a single document or instrument showing that the original landlord had leased out the suit property 2 to them or either of them and therefore, the relationship of landlord and tenant in relation to the suit property was not at all established. This is a finding of fact recorded by both the Courts below. As a sequel to the said finding of fact, the Courts below decreed the claim for possession of the plaintiffs. Having heard learned Counsel for the appellants and having gone through the said finding of fact, I do not find any question of law much less any substantial question of law in the matter and there is no merit in the second appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw