yieHCOURTOFCSHHAmSOARHATBILASPUR -2.3 SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI H.L DArTU, CJ. PETiTIONeRS Con^JBlLPeSUon No.W of 2004 1.. M.D.Diwan, S/o 0.0. Diwan, aged 35 yeans, Ocoupation - Service presently working as iecturer in D.D.S. Higher Secondary School, Birra, Wo Near Doordarehan Cerrtre, B.D.M. Hospital, Champa, district Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 2. N.P. Pandey, S/o. M.Lal, ageci 49 years, Occupation-Sen/ioe presently working as lecturer i'n D.D.S. Higher Secondary School, Birra, R/o Village-Karnaud, Via Bamnidih, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Alok Shukla, Secretary, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Departmert of Schoo! Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. B.P.S. Netam, District Eciucatton Officer, Janjgir.-Champa (C.G.) SontemEt.^tjtioQjjr^eLArtjcteJlg^fttieCor^jhrt^ofjngig, RESPONDENTS Present: Shri Indrasen Sahu, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counset for respondent No.2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 4m May, 2007) This Court by its order dated 15.10.2003 in writ petition No.3007/2003 had passed the following order and directions: Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and havlng regard to the facts and ciroumstances of the case, it is directed that the petiUoners may be allowed to continue on the post on whfch they are working today untll further ordere. (2) It is the case Of the petitioners before this Court that on the date when the order came to be passed by this Court, they were working as Lecturere ahd tlierefore, the respondents cannot ask them to work as Shiteha Kamnis and atso cannot pay salary ofthe Shiksha Karmi. Therefare, aceording tothe petitioners, ttie respondents have disobeyed wilfully and d^iberately the orders and directjons-issued by this Court an 15.10.2003. _.__— i- (3) Respondert No.2 has entered appearanee through tearned counsel and he has also filed hls detailed oounter affidavit atong with ordere passed by the State Govemment dated 15.07.2003 and 14.08.2003. (4) A perusal of the aforesaid orders would elearly demonstrate that petitioners' services came to be absorbed by the State Govemment only as Shiksha Kanrnis, and not as lecturere. On the day when the orcter came to be passed bythis Court, the petitioners were.working as Shiksha Karmis and not as lecturers. If they are continuing on the same post, In my op'nion, the respondents have not committed any act of disobeclience of the ordere and directions issued by this Court. Therefbre, 1 do not intend to take cognizance of this oontempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition is rejected. Any obsen/ations made by me in the oourse of the order would not eome in the way of the petitionere urging all the said contentions which are available to them in the writ petitlon which is pending before thls Court. Ordered accordingly. i Sd/- — Chief Justi.ee