IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29151 of 2010 NAVEEN RAI S/O HARESH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 504, 447 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner was granted bail by an order dated 22.1.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No. 1114 of 2010, on the ground that he had no criminal antecedents on account of which the informant filed an application for cancellation of bail, which was allowed vide Cr.Misc. No. 11908 of 2010 by an order dated 6.7.2010. Considering that the petitioner has remained in custody since 17.11.2009 and the occurrence took place on account of land dispute and the case is pending against him have been well explained, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Session Judge F.T.C. IIIrd Siwan in connection with Session Trial No. 322/2010/6/2010 (arising out of Nautan P.S. Case No. 71/2009), subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )