IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.118 of 2011 (M/S) Padam Ravinder Jeet Singh & Others ..… Petitioners Versus Assistant Collector Ist Class/Sub Divisional Magistrate Kashipur & Others ….. Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for respondent no.1 Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 5 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 22.9.2010 (Annexure-23) passed by respondent no.1 Assistant Collector Ist Class/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. According to the petitioners, this Court, in Writ Petition No.52 of 2009 (M/S), had directed the Assistant Collector, Ist Class/Up Zila Adhikari, Kashipur, to decide the application of the respondent nos.3 to 6, which was filed on 19.5.2007 in Revenue Case No.25/72 of 1966-67 after hearing the petitioners expeditiously as far as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order. It was also directed to the Assistant Collector concerned that while taking up the matter, he shall also see whether the tenure holder can hold the land more than the ceiling limit as prescribed under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act 1960. Subsequently thereafter the respondent no.2 filed a writ petition bearing WPMS No.1591 of 2010 for quashing of the order dated 2 5.8.2010 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kashipur, by which the Tehsildar, Bazpur was directed to enter the name of Sri Padam Ravindrajeet Singh in the revenue record. This Court finally disposed of that writ petition and directed the Sub Divisional Officer/Assistant Collector Ist to pass fresh orders in the matter after hearing the petitioners and all other parties including Padam Ravindrajit Singh without being influenced by the order of this Court. Order dated 5.8.2010 was kept in abeyance by this Court. It is pertinent to mention here that since this Court has already kept the order dated 5.8.2010 in abeyance, therefore there was no occasion to pass the order impugned. Therefore, till the decision is taken by the Assistant Collector/Up Zila Adhikari, impugned order dated 22.9.2010 (Annexure 23) shall also be kept in abeyance. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Certified copy of this order be issued to learned counsel for parties on payment of usual charges by tomorrow. (B.S. Verma, J.) 14.3.2011 RG