IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1064 of 2010 HAZARAT ALI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.03.2010 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in complaint case No. 2439 of 2004 under Sections 323, 341, 354, 380, 457 and 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in this case a compromise petition has been filed. It is also submitted the medical examination of the victim has not been done. The learned A.P.P. stated that the complainant has said in the complaint that she had gone to the police station for lodging a case but her case was not taken up and that out of poverty she did not get herself examined by the doctor. Heard. In view of there being direct allegation that the two petitioners armed with Katta entered into the complainant/victim’s hut and that the petitioner Md. Ajim committed rape on her and that petitioner Hazarat Ali captured the victim’s husband putting Katta on his body and that on cry when villagers assembled, the petitioners also threatened with Katta not to intervene in the commission of crime and that petitioner Hazarat Ali also took away Rs. 700/- from the hut, I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-