»® 8!N6LE BgNCH ^. IC) Ci IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. S, 6<^ Of 2006 PETITIONER ,. H.D.Mishra S/o Shri S.C.Mishra, Aged about 49 years, Assistant ^ ..-^ Statistical Officer, Integrated /^-{•'"r<^'\. Tribal Development Project, ^'\L^ ^ Ambikagur^^Distarct Surguja ^CGT—""' J^t^> ^v •^>- RESPONDENT VERSUS / The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary , Tribal and Scheduled Caste Development ; Departnient, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). _<? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA £ ^? XI-HC-78 3:5T^Trai?ra', oTTly'is, fsiciiyy WWfTarHT^l^^^.r^..^ ^^ 3TT^?T4ach (^yi^sl^ff) w^rwfN?; aw 3D^?r OTT?; s^aiw (ri^Tsn^r 21-7-2006:- Shri Rakesh Anthony, couns^l for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lfltttjyer for the Shite. Heard both the counsel. The petitioner, who \s worl and posted at The office of Proj Oevelopment Project, Ambikapur, that the petitioner's daughter nom] years, is suffering from ailment of| <til'i|fa'ifl-f WRTl'' ff fS^f <S^V,K ^3Tf^1T3TT^T <ing as Assistant Statistical Officer ict Administ'rotor, Integrat'ed Tribal District Surguja, has questioned his transfer order dat-ed 4* July 200^, Annexure-P/1, whereby he has been transferred To Dharamjaigarh, Disfrict Raigarh. This impugned order has b^en challenged mainly on the ground ^ly Suman Lo*a Mishra, aged about 22 seimres. The petitioner is posted at Surguja where the District l-losp|tal 'is availabte and the petitioner's doughter is regularly taking treat4ent at 1'he Oistrict Hospitat whereas, Dharcimjaigarh is a small place |where The District 1-tospital is not availotole. Counsel for the petitioner ^ubmitted that in the circumstances, the petitioner may be altowed to i)nake a representation on the medical ground to the respondent and he] be directed to decide the aune to which leamed counsel for responde^it has no objection. ;,t . .. . I. . . . . • Hdving heard learned counse|l for the part-ies, having regard to the fact)S/and circumstflnces of the ca^e, and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the pro^er mcde by leamed counset for the .•' petitioner is judt, fair and reas^nable. .Therefore, the petitioner is P.T.O. i-^ XI-HC-78 3^ '<ii'iiioii, BTn<ri<o, fciciiyy HIHtTT Sb^n<ft ^ 200 3I1^?T qgq? (y)(^st<,.iT) STI^T^iT^lNi cPIT 3TI^T stitli'b Barve '^ '^ ^aTWHfersn^T -^- Do allowed to md<e a detaiied petition raising all his grievances days from today and in tum,| representdrt-ion within a period of the r^resentcrt'ion, in an objecti^ points raised by the petittoner, in However, the effect and respect of the petitioner shall the petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesai^l Consequently, M.(W.)P. Part-ies are entitled repr^sentotion along with a copy of this the respondent within a period of 10 the respondent shdl decide the |30 days from the dote of receipt of ti)f& mamer, aft'er considering all the dccordance with law. ^eratim of the impugned order in rei^ain stoyed, tiit the representcrt-ion of <t)i''<tci<fl-i ^wm' if te<^t <Ri<-<;!< ^i3rf^tT3:n^?r I, the petH'iOT stands disposed of. No.2p01/2006 stands disposed of. for certjified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C; Judge P.T.O. ^-