IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17770 of 2011 Kanhaiya Kumar Versus The Union Of India & Ors ---------------------------------- 04 24.11.2011 Both sides present. This matter was disposed of under order dated 11.11.2011. The matter has been listed under the heading to be mentioned at the instance of the petitioner. It has been pointed out that in the cause title of the writ petition Roll No. assigned to the petitioner has wrongly been typed as 4090101259 in place of 4190101259. Learned counsel, in this regard, refers to and relies on Annexure-2. Both the parties agree that the aforesaid mistake seems to be bonafide and can be corrected. Accordingly, petitioner is granted liberty to effect appropriate correction in the cause title of the writ petition in course of the day. Consequently, Roll no. 4090101259 appearing in the cause title of the writ petition against name of the petitioner shall be read as Roll no. 4190101259. Learned counsel points out that in 5th paragraph of the order at page 1, the word ‘application’ has been wrongly printed in place of applicant. On going through the order, it appears that learned counsel is right in his submission. Accordingly the 4th word ‘application’ appearing in paragraph no.5 at page 1 of the impugned order shall be read as applicant. 2 The order dated 11.11.2011 passed in CWJC No. 17770 of 2011 is modified/clarified to that extent only. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)