réz/ (3‘? 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH w.p. N0. [gm/ /2004/ PETITIONERS 1. Vidhya Nand Laxme, S/o. Late Shri Jogiram, aged about 51 years, Working as Supervisor in Intigrated Child Deveiopment Scheme, Kusmi, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh Mandhari Ram, S/o. Late Shri Harbanshu Ram, aged about 48 years, Working as Supervisor in Intigrated Child Deveiopment Scheme, Bharatpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1. Union of India, Through: Secretary, Personal Public Grievances and Pension, Department of Personal Training, Lok Nayak Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Khan Market, New Delhi 11o 003 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Its Secretary, Deptt. of Public Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, , Raipur, Chhattisgarh Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ’ WRIT PETITION UNDER AKRfIdLELzzy‘bF zzg/ THE c0NsTITION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS : Ktdéhépgg‘.‘ go““5& mua5w‘ ' ‘ ‘Qs 6g QG‘Ph‘e petitioners named above most humbly and respectfully ole” \l ‘Qvam‘ 09 _ > Xx\ begs to submit as under:—‘ % % Dy 13/8/2004 Shri Sunil Sinha for the patitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Standing Counsel for Union of India. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A., for the State. 0n an oral roquost mzdo by the learned counsel for the petitioners, State of Madhya, Prade$h be joined as a} pany and the cause-title be amended. Shri Saehin Singh Rajpui;, Advocate, takes notice on behalfof the State of M.P. Copy of the petition with annexures be supplied to him. Heard. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitiOners were neither served with the order of provieional allocation nor final allocation. He further submittted that suddenly an order dated 31/5/2004 (Annexure-P/3) has ‘een received by them. For the matters like the'p esent one, it would be just and proper \\ ’ that the petitioners may be giv n an opportunity of filing a detailed e l \ warm ! respondent no.1/Union of India may ‘ representation and the Cell of decide the same in accordance x Having thus. consideredi, in the opinion of this Court, the petitioners are directed to subm it a detailed representation alongwith a copy of the order and the p< no.1/Union raising their grievai no.1 within nfteen days from tc lday; and on such representation being same on its oWn merits in accordance med, the Cell shall decide the with law as early as possible p1 ‘eferably within three months from the date of receipt of the represe itation. It is made clear that if any grievance still remains, the peti1 ion’ers may avail the remedy available under the law. With the aforesaid obser vations, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.NC .1612/2004 also stands disposed of. :tition before the Cell of respondent ices before the competent authority of Certified copy after the arnendment is incorporated. ../~ sdl— Fakhmdd‘“ Judge vith law.