AB 250/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A Roshid, learned counsel for the accused petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. PP, Assam who has produces the case diary. It is stated that there is no material against the accused petitioners Nos.2 and 3, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the informant. In view of the above, the interim bail order dated 28-1-2011 passed earlier is m ade absolute. However, there are some materials against the accused petitioner No.1, husband o f the informant. He is presently posted at Silchar, Cachar and there is no chanc e of absconding. It is also stated that he is willing to accept the informant wi fe and he is trying to settle the difference. Mr Roshid, learned counsel submits that a chance be given to the accused husband to settle the matter. In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused petitioner No.1 Shri Bibeswar Singha, in connection with Lakhipur PS Case No.378 /2010 u/s 498(A) IPC (GR Case No.4482/2010) he shall be enlarged on bail of Rs.2 0,000/- with one local surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arrestin g authority. However, he shall appear before the I.O. within seven days from tod ay for recording his statement. It is also provided that the accused petitioner No.1, after his first appearance before the I.O. shall appear before him once in every fortnight for a period of six months failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled. Further it is provided that he shall not leave the jurisdiction of Lakhipur without prior permission of the O.C. concerned. The bail application stands disposed of.