IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 1056,1198 & 1200 of 2011. Decided on: 16th May, 2011. 1. CWP No. 1056 of 2011. Ram Kali. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No. 1198 of 2011. Jabbar Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No. 1200 of 2011. Lal Bahadur. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved since they are not regularized in service. According to them, the cases are covered by the decision of this Court in Man Singh vs. State of H.P. rendered in CWP No. 1594 of 2008. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 3. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows: 2 4. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matters in the light of the decision of this Court in Man Singh’s case (supra) and take appropriate action in accordance with law after verifying the facts within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 5. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 16th May, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.