1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6670/2002 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.443/2002 SHRI UDEBHAN BAJIRAO GALBALE AND ANOTHER ..VS.. SUKHDEO BAJIRAO GALBALE & OTHERS =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK,J. DATED : 18th June, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that by an order dated 30.10.2002 this court had granted ad-interim stay to the execution of the decree passed by the appellate court so far as it relates to the delivery of possession. By order dated 27.11.2002, the ad-interim relief was continued. It appears that the second appeal is admitted on a substantial question of law by an order dated 16.4.2010. In these circumstances, it is necessary to continue the ad-interim relief granted by this court on 30.10.2002 during the pendency of the second appeal. The execution of the decree passed by the appellate court is therefore, stayed during the pendency of the 2 second appeal, so far as it relates to delivery of possession. Civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE SECOND APPEAL NO.443/2002 The learned counsel for the respondent states that respondent no.2 has expired. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks 3 weeks time to take necessary steps. Time granted. JUDGE SMP