FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2005. Pradeep Krishna Korgaonkar. .. Appellant. vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Shri N.N. Gavankar with Arfan Sait for the appellant. Shri D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 15-2-2005. 15-2-2005. 15-2-2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. 2. This is an appeal for modification of the condition imposed by the trial court while granting bail to the appellant. The trial Court has observed as under: "The applicant shall deposit Rs.7500/- per month in Court. In case if he joined on duty with Hindustan Petroleum where he was working before his arrest and suspended from duty, if suspension is revoked." The appellant takes exception to the said condition imposed by the trial Court. After the said condition was imposed he had preferred an application for modification of the said order. However, application for modification was rejected. 3. In my view, the said condition cannot be imposed as it pertains to the events which are likely to take place in future. The charge-sheet is already filed against the appellant. The said condition is, therefore, set aside. The appeal is is allowed in the above terms. 4. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. --