IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10188 of 2009 KUSHESHWAR THAKUR SON OF LATE JIBACHCH THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SRIKHANTH BHITHA, P.S. SURSAND, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI. Versus 1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, E.P.F.ORGANISATION, R. BLOCK, ROAD NO.6, PATNA 2. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, BENIPATTI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. ----------- 5 11.12.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to revision of pension. It is stated that similarly situated persons are getting more monthly pension that the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 submits that in case a representation giving specific details of the claim as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim is filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances, as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no. 2. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the grievances as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the claim of the petitioner for revision of pension could be settled without delay and admissible payment could be made to the petitioner with statutory interest, if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)