IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5652 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.09.2009 Rishi Pal @ Jaggu .....Petitioner versus Braham Devi and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.H.P.S.Aulakh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-tenant impugns the order dated 12.8.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, whereby his application to adjourn the eviction petition sine-die has been dismissed. The petitioner's grievance is that the impugned order has deprived him of an opportunity to lead evidence against Issue Nos.1 & 3 and prove that he has already purchased the disputed property by way of a registered sale deed and thus, there exists no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. C.R. No.5652 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant, I do not find any merit in the contention noticed above. The impugned order merely declines to adjourn the eviction petition sine-die. Both the parties shall be at liberty to lead their respective evidence in support or against the issues(s) framed and thereafter only the final conclusions shall be drawn by the Rent Controller. Dismissed. 25-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE