WP(C) 3169/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard Mr. MK Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Ahmed, learned S tanding Counsel, Irrigation for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of carrying out certain contract ual works vide Work Order No. Misc/3/373 & 3/367 dated 25/1/91, Misc./3/369 & 3/ 371 dated 25/1/91 and NED/9/IV/7439 dated 6/12/91, he has not been paid his dues by the respondents. It is submitted that the case of the petitioner is covered by the decision rendered in Tamsher Ali & ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors. repo rted in 2008(4) GLT 1. Certain guidelines have been framed in the said decision towards payment of contractual works. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said guidelines fr amed in the above cited case. The respondents shall examine the case of the pet itioner in terms of the directions/guidelines contained in the above noted case and pass appropriate order. With this order, the writ petition stands disposed of.