IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14413 of 2000 Date of decision July 4, 2011 Vipin Singal and others ....... Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. S. D. Bansal , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karminder Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG., Haryana for respondent Nos.6 to 9. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter has become infructuous and the same be disposed of as such. 2. As ordered. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 4, 2011 archana