IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4363 of 2010 MD. HASAN @ TUNNA, S/o Md. Kalam Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR 2/ 23.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 498A and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Earlier the complainant had filed a case under Section 498A of the I.P.C., which was withdrawn in the year, 2008. Thereafter the petitioner filed a Matrimonial case bearing Matrimonial Suit no. 39 of 2009 for restitution of marriage. In the aforesaid case, the complainant filed her petition, which is annexed as Annexure-2 Series. The complainant has again filed this case under Section 498 A and 420 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, as the petitioner again began to torture her after compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is willing to keep her and that is why he filed the Matrimonial case. It would appear from Annexure-2 itself that the accused / petitioner used to torture the complainant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)