:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 1991 Virat Apartment Owners Association and Others .. Petitioners. Vs. CIDCO and Others .. Respondents. None for the petitioners. Mr.Rajendra Sawant for respondent no.1. Mr.M.N.Dhumal for respondent no.2. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006. P.C: . The learned counsel for the respondents have invited our attention to the order dated 20.8.1992 passed in Civil Application No.2682 of 1992 moved in this writ petition. Civil application was disposed of in terms of the minutes of order signed by the respective parties and obviously the order has been acted upon. The learned counsel for respondent no.1 also states that with the passage of time there may be some cases and there case would be of multiple transfer pursuant to which the order dated 20.8.1992 was passed. It appears that for the last about 14 years no further steps have been taken by the petitioners to seek any further orders and none has remain present on the earlier occasions. :2: :2: :2: 2. The petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 20.8.1992. Rule is made absolute, accordingly, with no order as to costs. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)