IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.37329 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 19, 2011 Sonia & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. When the petitioners were asked to file an affidavit to the effect that they have performed this marriage at Barwala, they have not come forward to comply with the directions. Counsel for the petitioners says that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Obviously, this petition has been filed without much basis. There was no threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners and they have just invoked the jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed with costs of `2,000/-, to be deposited in the accounts of legal Services Authority, Haryana. A copy of this order be sent to Advocate General, Haryana, who will ensure compliance of this order. December 19, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE