1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD ICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.30/2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3632/2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO.13/2009 (D) Applicant :- Shri Eknath s/o Ramaji Talekar, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Labour, R/o Ward No.4, Kelod Pahlepar, Tq. Saoner, District Nagpur. ...Versus... Respondent :- 1. State of Maharashtra, through the P.S.O. P.S. Lodhikheda, Tahsil Saunsar, Distt. Chahindwada (M.P.). 2. Sou. Sunita w/o Eknath Talekar, aged about 34 years, Occ. Private Tailor. 3. Master Vidyakant s/o Eknath Talokar, Aged about 3 years, Occu. Nil, Both resident of C/o Gajanan Rajeram Khodankar, Ward No.15, Lodhikheda, Tah. Saunsar, District Chhinwada. ................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................ [Ms Nandita Dubey, Adv. (appointed) for applicant] [Shri D.B. Patel, APP for respdt. No.1] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 01.04.2010 Heard. Learned Counsel for the applicant makes a statement that she does not want to amend the revision. Hence, office objection is waived. 2 Having heard learned Counsel for the applicant and having gone through the contents of the application, I find that good and sufficient grounds exist for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. Criminal Application is allowed. Criminal Application stands disposed of. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3632/2009 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Criminal Revision is restored to file. Criminal Application stands disposed of. CRIMINAL REVISION NO.13/2009 Stand over to 15.04.2010 to file the order of the trial Court. JUDGE ssw