/'^"^ ^ 37 •if^^'T^MtST raA'g^ 3S'^ CONTEMP" N0.tf i't I i 1 »U« S\ ^ ^ t^^^'/^-^h l^ ^u<, ^^ '3>T. /^ !7^*'^*"r ^ 3f"^,^ .? ^*L'°^ ;f:^i*'n;' *^-" SMirma'a ynarea uewanoan. /i ^,^i ^,t^^,,,4 ,CQ i.sy^^ es^tju^ '^-.^' lA^f^a f~.f Qh':; J ^S g V "l I 3 'C ^ J ^O^ U ft S Harinatn Dewangan.. Head B^^J.-^—^ ^.^.,^,..»»^.^^» O!,-.;^.^,^. aV?iS^.i dSS, lli-3:'yV<Si U, i J%3 !<. . 3~'S'St i iiEi j School, Dnanpunji, Jagdalpur pt;:A^,^;—<,'•J^,^,.^,»./^t^^,^iv'..^.^^»i~,\ U:i.SU tt-'^, 0<SSl5;i ^i U iiCS.i.Uw^CSi i i^ n 'v^s" r^:< Somssyya, Distnct. fcducation r\ff;^.»y !^^^j/-3-^,.». rli,;^*»;.^4. a^^fr.^. ^U^-S!, u'0^Uffi,^^3i j L/i^<i,Hwii, ^CieS.Gti (Chhattisaarhi CONTEMPT PETiTlON UNDER ARTSCL£215 Gf THE !T! !TI<~>M r»C IMPISA <.<^--4a('3 t5'?nf S ui] ii •'i^' S ^ ^c,." •-S •^ni''» it • ^ .'i5s""ii y»,"^,ffi's y^s ?*ii"-^ Mr. H.B. Asara/al, Senior Advocate vv'tn Mr. K.S. Pswai u-ounsci ?or ?H6 psijtionsf. ,'•37 BS 9S1n't i3^' a^^=A^ a;yj; SUNlLXVMARSiNHA. J. Petitioner.Srnt. Nlnnaia Snanta Dewangan has fi'ea tr'is petitlon for inltiation of proceedings of contempt against tne resDondent for willfui disobedience of the order dated 7~:' of DecerTiber 2009 passed bv this Coun: 'n Wnt Appeal 'No.357/2009. Tne petitioner was worKing on tne post of Head Mlstress in Govemmeni Pnmary Scnooi, Dhanpunji, JagGaipur. By order datea 30.06.2009, the petltioner was transferred from Dnanpumi to Mongrapal, Bakawand. She chaliengecl tne vaiic'ty of the said'order by f'lmg VV.P.(SS No.5999/2009. The sa'a wnt pstition W3S di3mlss©d'bv s S!po!9 Bsnch of thls Court on 22 of Qctober 2009. Asainst ths sa!d orosr dsted 22"° of Octobsr 2009, passed by the iearned Singie Judge. tlie petrtioner fi'eci W.A. No.357/2009. Tne said VVnt Appeai came up for near.Bg.:, it'fi CONTEMPT CASE (CivsiS N0.170/2010 before the Divlsion Bench of thls Court on 7In of December 2009 and tne Umsion Bench ciismissed the sa'd wnt appeai Dy oassina tne rollowina order; % "Leamed counsei for the appeiiant seeKs permiss'on of this Court to wittidrsw flhfs writ appeai wsth iiberty to pursue remedy avalSabie to her by way of maKing representation to the concerned auTnoraies. The writ'aDDeai is dismissed as witiidrawn vyith the aforesaid libertv." ' Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submlts ihat thereafter, a representation was sent on 12.04.2010 (Annexure - U), out tne same Has not been disposed of tiil dcte, merefore, the petitioner had to file thss contempt petition. Aftsr poinc^ throuQh th9 contsnts ofth9 ordsr ciBtcd ? of Deceinber 2009, i am of the opinion tnat in such event. the proceedinas of contempt cannot &e initiated aaainst the respondent. The.counsei for the Detrtloner had wiihdrawn the wnt appeal and a liberty was sought for maKing representatlon and the Divssion Bench clismissed the writ appeai with the said tibsrw. but li d!d not aave anv d'rectlon So the ccncsrned 'authonties in tlia's behalf.' . On due consiaeration of the above facts, particuiarty tne racts contained in the order dated 7" of December 2009, ! do not find any good ground to proceed further in tne matter. The contempt petition Is ilaDle to be and is hereby dlsmissed summariiy. __^———— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge