IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15645 of 2008 SAMSUL HAQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 14.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is seeking bail in a case under Section 498A, 323 and 312 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is the husband. The allegation is that the petitioner along with others assaulted his wife and threw her out of the house. The petitioner is custody since 28.1.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had divorced his wife in December, 2005 itself. Counsel for the informant submits that she has not been paid the amount of ‘Dain Mahar’ as yet. Learned counsel further sumits that he has filed a case in the Court of the Principal Judge, Muzaffarpur in which he has stated that he is ready to pay the amount of ‘Dain Mahar’ by him to the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner Samsul Haque is directed to be released on bail in Vaishali P.S. Case No. 64 of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan,J.)