IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 7050 of 2010(E) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. M.K.NANDAKUMAR, QUALITY CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING BLOCK, PUTHIYAROAD, MEVELLOOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. P.U.JAMES, PARUTHIKKATTUVYPPEL, MEVELLOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM. 3. P.E.THANKACHAN, PAMAPADIYIL, KULEYETTIKKARA, ERNAKULAM. 4. M.K.PRAKASAN, MOOTHEDATH HOUSE, MEVELLOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM. 5. GOPAKUMAR, MUKKATH HOUSE, MEVELLOOR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE VELLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MEVELLOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD KOTTAYAM DISTRICT OFFICE, REPRESENTED BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER. 3. THE GEOLOGIST, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAI. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER: SRI P NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.7050 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioners herein are running brick manufacturing units, as seasonal work. The main prayer in the writ petition is to quash Exts.P25 to P29. It appears that the objections have been raised by the respondents with regard to the manufacturing units run by the petitioner and the matter was heard by Revenue Divisional Officer. Pending the same the writ petition was filed. 2. It appears that after hearing the petitioners, fresh orders have been passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer. As it is adverse to the petitioner, the petitioner seeks to challenge the same in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that the petitioners may be allowed to remove the bricks manufactured when there was no prohibition. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. The petitioners will be allowed to remove bricks which have been manufactured, without any obstruction by the fourth respondent. The petitioners will have to submit the details to the fourth respondent before removal. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) skj