IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No.: 245 of 2011. Decided on: 16.08.2011. ___________________________________________ Asha Rani. …Petitioner. Versus Manisha Siri Dhar and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): On 12th August, 2011, the Director, Urban Development to the Government of Himachal Pradesh was requested to be present before the Court. She has appeared. She has assured the Court that in the eventuality of all the documents being supplied by the petitioner, the case of the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petitioner shall be considered for the release of family pension and other retiral benefits, within a period of one month thereafter. 2. Consequently, the contempt petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to supply all the necessary documents to the Director, Urban Development to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, within a period of two weeks from today. Thereafter, the case of the petitioner for family pension and other retiral benefits shall be processed by the Director, Urban Development, as undertaken hereinabove, within a period of one month. However, it is made clear that the release of the retiral benefits will abide by the outcome of the LPA, if any, preferred against the judgment in question. The notices stand discharged. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 16, 2011. (sck).