1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4321 OF 2010 (Smt. Chanda Raju Reddy vs. Mahatma Phule Charitable Hospital & Trauma Centre) with WRIT PETITION NO. 4322 OF 2010 (Keshav Jagdev Khotre vs. Mahatma Phule Charitable Hospital & Trauma Centre) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 16, 2010. Heard Shri Tambde, learned counsel for the petitioner – employee. He points out that in Award proceedings, the Labour Court, Akola, has granted reinstatement with continuity while answering the issues but then in operative part, that reinstatement has not been ordered. His further contention is, the grant of amount of Rs.15,000 (in W.P. No. 4321/2010) and Rs.20,000/- (in W.P. No. 4322/2010) by way of compensation is only towards denial of back wages. He, therefore, argues that as the impugned Award shows non application of mind, the interference in writ jurisdiction is necessary. With his assistance I have perused the impugned Award. There is nothing to show except the answer mentioned against issue No. 2, that the Labour Court has granted reinstatement. On the contrary, the Labour Court has found that reference proceedings were filed belatedly and therefore, after noticing monthly 2 salary of Rs.1,200/- or Rs.1,600/- per monthly respectively granted consolidated compensation to both the petitioners. The Labour Court has also noticed that the Charitable Hospital and Trauma Centre was closed since 2001. In this situation, I do not find any perversity or jurisdictional error. The petitioner had worked from 1995 till 1998. No case is, therefore, made out. Writ Petition is rejected. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.