IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.634 of 2009 RANJEET KUMAR Versus SMT.ARCHANA SHARMA ----------- 2 27.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that in the deposition of P.W. 1 one date was wrongly typed as “16.01.2006” whereas it should have been “16.01.2005”. It was overlooked by the witness at the time of signing his deposition. When that mistake in the year of the date came to the notice of the plaintiff, petition has been filed for recall of P.W. 1 only for that limited purpose which has been rejected by the learned court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of service of notice the defendant has not yet appeared in the suit and therefore, no prejudice will be caused to the defendant. This court has perused the impugned order dated 26.03.2009. Without going into the details of reasons given by the learned court below, this court feels that in the interest of justice it would be appropriate that P.W. 1 is re-called for formal correction of year of the date in his earlier deposition. The revision application is accordingly allowed and the learned court below is directed to recall P.W. 1 for the purpose. Kundan (J. N. Singh, J.)