IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17321 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15.09.2011 Surender Kumar Garg .... PETITIONER Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. I.D. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioner, who claims himself to be an oustee, has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to the respondents to allot him a plot, being an oustee under the Haryana Urban Development Authority's Policies dated 18.3.1992 and 12.3.1993. Admittedly, before approaching this Court, the petitioner did not make any representation to the authorities concerned. In view of this admitted position, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to first approach the authorities and thereafter, if the representation submitted by the petitioner is not considered by the authorities, then he may approach this Court, in CWP No. 17321 of 2011 -2- accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE September 15, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) ndj JUDGE