IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 2396 of 2011 Date of Decision: 16.09.2011 Bhupinder Kaur & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Navkesh Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Monika Chibbar Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 4 and 9. Mr. N.P.S.Mann, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Ms. Anuja Saxena, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Mr. Vinod S.Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.7. Mr. Ishwar Lal, Advocate, for respondent No. 8. **** SURYA KANT, J.(Oral) The petitioners seek a direction to consider their claim for appointment against vacant posts of E.T.T. Teachers in the category of 'Special Teachers' who are trained for children with disability. CWP No. 2396 of 2011 [2] It is stated that certain vacancies are still available and claim of the petitioners can be considered in the light of the observations made by this Court in its order dated 14.09.2010 passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 9123 of 2009 (Mahesh Kumar V. State of Punjab and others). Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the relief so claimed, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for appointment against vacant posts, if any, in the light of the observations made in Mahesh Kumar's case (supra). Needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of this order be handed over to the learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for information and necessary compliance. Dasti. 16.09.2011 (SURYA KANT) 'ravinder' JUDGE