IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.12507 of 2008 Date of decision : May 19, 2011 Anuradha Rana …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramkant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : M/s Ramesh Thakur & R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. It is admitted by both the parties that the matter is covered by a Division Bench judgment, dated 16th December, 2010, of this Court, delivered in a bunch of cases, titled as Ravi Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another (CWP No.4550/2010), and several other cases. 3. Issues involved in the aforesaid bunch of cases were similar to the ones involved in this case. The Division Bench held that period of service rendered, on tenure basis, prior to the regularization of service, is required to be counted for increment and pensionary benefits. Therefore, the present petition is allowed and Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… the respondents are directed to take into account the tenure period of service of the petitioner as TGT (Arts), from 30th October, 1987 to 31st August, 1994, for increment and pensionary benefits. Direction be complied with within three months. Writ petition stands disposed of. May 19, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J