:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.401 OF 1997 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.401 OF 1997 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.401 OF 1997 Rajendra Chunilal Mehta ...Petitioner. v. Inderjeet Sharma & Ors. ...Respondents. And Anil Tarachand Jain & Ors. ...Opponents. Mr.H.S.Murthy , adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.Deepak Chitnis , adv. for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri V.M.Parshuramani i/by A.B.Kadam, advs. for the Respondent No.4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 2nd April, 2008. DATE: 2nd April, 2008. DATE: 2nd April, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This contempt petition is pending for the last about 11 years on the ground that the respondents had demolished certain wall in violation of the Court orders. Petition is still pending only at the admission stage and the record reveals that petition has been adjourned from time to time for amicable settlement between the parties. The contempt petition has become stale and the very purpose of filing contempt petition appears to have been frustrated. The learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that parties have exchanged draft proposals for amicable settlement of all the disputes between the parties and, therefore, he does not want to prosecute this contempt petition any more. :2: 2. In view of the above circumstances, petition stands disposed off without any further action. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)