(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 133 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 133 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 133 OF 2004 Gangaram Babu Panari ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Suresh Sabrad, counsel for Petitioner ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . Mr. Sabrad, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the ad-interim order on the basis of which this contempt petition has been moved, was subsequently vacated and therefore, the contempt petition does not survive. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.