HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Cl N0.46 of 2010 PETITiONER RESPQNDENTS 1 Manohar Satnami, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Lalji Satnami, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 2 The Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 The Tahsildar, Tahsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Counsel forthe petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents on advance copy. ^ORALORDER (08.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard finaliy with the consent of the parties. Petitioner- Manohar Satnami has filed this petition for the following reliefs: (i) This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to produce all the relevant records pertaining to the petitioner's case. << WRIT PETITION (CV N0.46 of 2010 ^^^ (iv) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pteased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Tehsildar to accept the application of the petitioners within a week and disposed of the same in accordance with law within a period of 2 weeks. Issue any other order or orders, writ or writs, direction or directions as this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents. Cost ofthe petition be allowed. Thus, in substance, the petitioner is praying for a direction to the Tehsildar for accepting the application of the petitioner and deciding it in accordance with law. . A perusal of the records of thewrit petition would show that in a Revenue Revision Case NO.A/14/R/B-121/90/2009, the. Circuit Bench at Raipur of Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur, has passed the final order on 13 of October 2009, whereby, the order passed by the Sub DivisionaE Officer on 31.08.2009 has been set aside and the matter has been remanded to the Tehsildar, Raipur for expediting the proceedings of mutation in the name of the petitioner on the suit lands, after taking evidence of Sarpanch, Kotwar and other persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after passing of this remand order by the Board of Revenue on 13th of October 2009, the Tehsiidar, Raipur is not taking any action and is not deciding the matter of mutation in the name of the petitioner. There is no reason that after passing of the remand order with specific direction by the Board of Revenue, the Tehsildar being the subordinate authority of the Board of Revenue, wouid decline to entertain the matter. The Tehsildar is WRIT PETITION iC} N0.46 of 2010 bound by the order passed by the Board of Revenue and is under obligation to compiy with the said order in light of the direction issued by the Board. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, 1 deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition by observing that the Tehsildar, Raipur would expedite the hearing in the matter as per the order dated 13th of October 2009 passed by the Board of Revenue and would take a finai decision in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition stands finally disposed of . No order as to costs. i Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge shyna