63.) (1/5? 1% . IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wRIfr PETITION IS) N09$w§ 72010 PETITIONER f Smgie. ganch ’gésant Kumar Lathare son of y Shri Jiwan L‘al Lathare, aged about 41 years, assistant Teacher, Government Primary School, Amhawa Block Podi—Uproda District Korba (co) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ' State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.J 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Rajpur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba ~ District Korba (C.G.) WRIT'PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2f6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPU WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2405 OF 2010 Basant Kumar Lathare Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Canstitution of India) Singie Bench :Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. PETITIONER‘ RESPONDENTS ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 7‘ day of May, 2010) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments on passing of B.T.I. examination, on his own expenses, before entering into service. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue l? involved in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State oft/LP. & Orsl 3) Learned counsel further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision in Asha Saxena (supra). Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SAttSH K. AGNJHOTRIw Judge Amit R