(^gBencte 5. BEFORE THE HO BLEHIGH^QURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITP^TITIQN N0^2-J^Z/20Q6 PETITIONER -y^K^ ^^s^ •'" A^'"-^.V"" ^ A--' RESPONDENTS ^ ,>y>: Bafatu Khan, S/o. Shri Nabbu ,y'~AKhan, Aged about 45 years, Working as Assistant Teacher in Govemment Prunary School, Kanhaibandh, P.0. Shivni, Development Block Nawagarh, Janjgir Distt. Janjgir-Chaiiipa (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, School Education Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 3. The Principal, Govemm.ent Priraary School, Kanhaibandh, Development Block Nawagarh, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Chainpa (C.G.) 4. The CoUector, District Janjgir- Chainpa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS,ORDER/ORDERS,DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY QR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. XI-HC-78 *11*1C11 Sb*<lcb 75T '<||q|d<<, (?Tfl«'l<o, Rl<1Wy ^..^£.W.^W[ 200 3TT^?Tqsra'(^fg^ST) sn^Twf^TRi trar^n^TshHro ^- ?<<TRII(l1W3TI^T ^^ Shri Kishore Bhadur-i, Advocc|te for the petitioner. Shr-i Satish ffupta, Dy. fiovt. Heard. The only grievance raised b^ per Rationalization Scheme, 2006 i| then only the junior most teochers ^re to be included in the surplus list and to be tr-ansferred cs per scheme. Whe^reas, in the pr'esent case, there are msny junior teachers to the petitioner, tjut their names have not been included in the list cnd the name of the petitio^ner" has been included in contravention of the scheme. Against this ir'regularity A ill correct according to the scheme, an Since the petitioner has With the direction aforesaid wifepftr wicrfif tecA Tf3i%R ^arf^Tan^r ^dv. for the State on advance copy. the petitioner in this petition is that as n case of surplus teachers in any school, igality committed by the respondents, the petitioner- has the remedy to file ai^ appeai before the oppellate authority as per clause-7 of the rationalizatior( scheme and the appellate author'ity is bound to consider the grievance ^f the petitioner, if the some is found d to cor-rect the same. equally efficacious aiternative remedy availabie, therefore, he should (jrefer an appeal before the appellate authority and the authority to consi^er the points roised by the petitioner. The time taken by the petiti^ner in filing this petition till its disposal shall be condoned in preferring the ijippeal before the appellate authority. the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.32^1/06 also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per ruies. Sdl- L.C.Bhadoo Judge