IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 21060 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.04.2011 Surinder Singh ....Petitioner versus Addl. Registrar (G), Cooperative Societies, Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Mr. Sartaj Singh gill, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6. Mr. Virinder Singh Punia, Advocate for respondent No.3. Nemo for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 has stated that since the election process of Bhullan, C.A.S.S. Ltd., Bhullan, District Sangrur (respondent No.3) has already been completed, so, the writ petition has become infructuous. That appears to be the reason that nobody is appearing on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the case. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of, as having become infructuous. Needless to mention that the petitioner would be at liberty to avail his appropriate remedy, to challenge the main election process, in accordance with law. April 29, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge