IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1628 of 2010 1. RANJIT MAHTO 2. RAJESH KUMAR …PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR …OPPOSITE PARTY For the petitioners :Mr. Shambhu Pd. Singh For the State :Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay,APP ----------- 02. 03.12.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. The two petitioners who have been declared juvenile in conflict with law, have approached this Court seeking bail. They are facing charge(s) punishable under sections 395, 397 and 412 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in remand home/custody since 09.01.2010. It is submitted that the parents of the petitioners are ready to take responsibility in case they are released on bail. From the order impugned passed on appeal being Cr. Appeal No.86/2010, it is evident that these two petitioners are involved in several heinous crimes relating to loot in railways. Learned appellate court has observed as under in paragraph 6: “Learned P.P. has vehemently opposed this criminal appeal filed by two appellants and has submitted that the impugned order mentions criminals antecedent of the two appellants in plurality of the cases including train loot and for that their release on bail shall given them opportunity to join criminal gang as before leading to causing physical, mental and psychological danger to them which would frustrate the ends of the justice as found and held by the learned 2 Juvenile Justice Board for which order passed by it herein impugned is perfectly justified.” This Court agreeing with the view taken by the appellate court in paragraph 6, is not inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Prayer is refused. However, having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court grants them opportunity to renew their prayer for bail in the court below itself upon expiry of seven months from the date of receipt/communication of this order in the court below if the trial does not record sufficient progress. In that event, the court below shall consider their application for bail unprejudiced by the present order. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )