IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8710 of 1999 Between: Smt. C. Lalitha, W/o. C. Joseph, Kurnool Medical College Post Office, Kurnool. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Union of India, Rep. by its Chief Post Master General, Andhra Pradesh, Circle, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Postal Services, Kurnool Division, Kurnool. 3 The Superintendent of Post Offices, Kurnool Division, Kurnool. 4 The Sub-Divisional Inspector of Post Offices, Kurnool East Sub Division, Kurnool. 5 Y.Yellappaa, S/o. Yellappa, R/o. H.NO.46/732, Budhavaripeta, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ Order or direction more in the nature of Certiorari calling for records relating to the Judgment in O.A.NO.1051/97 dated 1.1.1999 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad as also department of posts Lr.NO.17-104/91-ED& Trg. dated 18- 9-1995 and the notification in Memo.No.PF/EDSV/KMC date 29-3-1999 issued by the Sub Divisional Inspector of Post Offices, Kurnool East Sub Division, Kurnool and quash the same and consequently declare that the Petitioner is validly appointed as E.D.S.V. of Kurnool Medical College Sub Office, Kurnool and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{PRASAD} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY W.P.No.8710 of 1999 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) This writ petition was already dismissed for default against the respondent No.5, who is the applicant in O.A.No.1051 of 1997, on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, by the default order dated 01-12-2004. The petitioner is not entitled for any relief without there being the contesting respondent No.5 as the writ petition itself was dismissed against him. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH _____________________________ 15th June 2009 JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY Kvr