063 1 a732\ mmg gEmw IN THE HIGH COURT OF IUDICATURE : CG : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO (S) : é&\$\ OF 2010 / PETITIONER : Pankharasiyus Tirki aged 56 yrs, s/o Shri C.Tirki Senior Internal Auditor and Taxing Officer, Janpad Panchayat : Kunkuri Distt— Iashpur CG - VERSUS - 1. /The State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary to the Govt. of CG, Department 0f Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur CG RESPONDENTS 2."’/The Director Panchayat and Social Welfare, Raipur, Distt- Raipur CG 3. ’/ The Chief Municipal Officer, Janpad Panchayat: Bagicha, Distt- Jashpur CG WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA hi??? 'w‘3SRT OF CH%%RTT§SSARH : E€iA$?UR WRI? DE *ii’GN ($3) NO $4a‘a (3F 2i???) PE'TIT§GNEF€ ir—an§<%1arasiyus “m Versus R‘ $PONEENTS "rm Siaie a? Chmitisgarh & Gthem (Wrii Feiiiios‘: wade? Aaiima 226 of ihe Comiituticn 3f iadiaé 3imie Senah : Hon‘bie $hri Satish K. Agnihom, J. P?esem :- Sm'i Anufag Daya! Shfivasiava, Advocate for the petitioner. Sim Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawver f0,“ ihe 8mm. ~.. wEER {OR/AL) {Passed on ms 24‘“ day of August} 201 1} A. .. “hr: Q Samasaiava. { ‘ leamed counseé appearing for fhe peiitioner submits that the peiiiioner §$ working on the post of Senior Mtefnai Auditor & Taxing Gi7acerJr‘Ey an earlier orcier ef inierim arrangement daieci 15.07.2010 {Annexuie P—Z‘p, ihe geiiiioner was seni from Janpaci Panchayat Bagicha! {Sisiiici Jas‘nnur i0 Janpad Panchayat Kunkuri! Distiict Jas‘npur. in ¢ompiiance of the said ere‘er. the petitioner was reiieveci from Bagicha on $308.2i3‘a0 (Annexure 13—3) and ‘ne joined at Kunkuri on 11.08.2010 {Annexure R4,}. Thereafz‘er, jus‘i after one month of the joining of ihe eeiitioner at Kunkuri vide imnugned order dated 10.09.26’30 (Annexure P-i), ine peiirioner has been again iransferred from Kunkuri. Districi Jas‘ngaur io Ramonandrapur, District Surguja and it has been meniioned in the impugned crder that the above amendmeni is being made on account of rhe represeniation made by the petiiioner. However, ihe petitioner has never made a represeniaiion for change of his posting after joining at 7g 2. Shri S’irivasiava. further submits iiiat bv virtue of order daieti 11.11 .2010. ihe order dated 10.{)9.2G1G ifannexure P-i), which is impugned herein couid noi be oiven effeoi to, wherein this Court directed io maintain status 1' aguo. Shri Shrivasiava, nexi submits that the petiiioner is continuing at the originai piace or” posting. unKari, and as such. ine impugned order is noijuei and proper. C)a Leameza‘ cam-nae? appearing fer the Staie respondents submits thai the Governmen‘z may be gi'anied iiberiy ta pa$s a fresh order withcut insisting on campiiance of order ciatea‘ 19.0%.2G‘EG (Annexure F4) m respect of the petitiener. S'mce more fear: 4,1 months have passed and in View of the order dated iiiizms. the petitioner is continuing ai the originai piece of posiing; rhuei ii is net necessary i0 g0 inte the merits 0f the case at this stage. in View of ine abeve submiesien, accorciing i0 iearned counsei for the pe§itionery mining suwivee fer atijudication at ihis siege. Accerciingi», the writ petition is ciisposed of with the aforesiaied oeseweiien enéi iibeny. if se advised. ‘ 8d!- Satish K. Agnihotri" Judge 0”) ,‘WT