IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15415 of 2011 SUNIL KEDIA S/o Sri Ram Kumar Kedia of Ruhy Leasing Co. Ltd. at 33A, Jawahar Lal Nehru Road, Kolkata ……. …….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ……. ……Opp. Parties ----------- 2. 4.5.2011. Heard Mr.Jitendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Binod Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The present petition has been filed for restoration of Cr. Misc. No.2763 of 2002, which stood rejected due to non- appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner on two consecutive dates. The case was firstly taken up on 24.8.2010 but none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, the case was adjourned for a day with a direction that no further adjournment shall be granted. While adjourning the case, it was noticed that interim order of stay was continuing since 12.2.2004. Again, on the next date i.e. 25.8.2010 there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and, as such, the petition was rejected due to non- prosecution. The ground set forth in the present petition for restoration is not sufficient to persuade the court to pass a favourable order. The restoration petition stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)