IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29264 of 2010 MRITUNJAY SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I.P.C. From the impugned order, it appears that in reconciliation proceeding, the complainant refused to restore the matrimonial relationship. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, Mritunjay Sah be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 2326 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)