^'•^ •^ C^ •3^='^— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.GI W.P. fSI N0. "7 L8 /2007 PETITIONERS ^l ^A. ..-^ OY/"x.--''" ^ ^.-^ ^.••''^••''^ ,.^-'\^.---' .•/^^y ^.- t/ ^f ^^ .^ ^oTf^rt.^" ^f/iy y ~ <p l<9^ ^' 3 G^ ^c^lS. Sharad Kumar Sharma Aged about 43 Years, S/o. Shri Laxmi Prasad Sharma,Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Khamtarai, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Raghunath Singh Rathore Aged about 42 years, S/o Shri Kashi Prasad Rathore, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Sukali, Block Navagarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Santosh Kumar Kashyap Aged about 42 years, S/o Shri Mokaruram, Govt.Primary School Semariya, Block Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Footbal Dansena Aged about 43 years, S/o SHri Dhanilal, Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School Karnoud, Block Bamnihdih, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^'-- ^i' ^ RESPONDENTS .1. ^5. Suryakant Sharma, Aged about 42 years, S/o Gokul Prasad Sharma, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Lingiyadih, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) ^' 3. District Education Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer Janjgir-Champa, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION QF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BLL^SPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SAT!SHK.AGN!HQTR!^J. ^titioners Respondents WR!T PETSTSON ,'S.l N0.728 OF 2007 Sharad Kumar Sharma and othere versus StaSe of Chhattisgarh and othere Present : Mr. Ramakant Pandey, counse! for the petftioners. Mrs. Anju Ahuj'a, Deputy Government Advocate for ths rth (Passed on 7"' Day of February, 2007) Learnsd counse! appearing for the parties Jointly submit that the facte and question of law Invoh/ed in the present writ petition are squareiy covered by the decision of thls Court in the case of Har Prasad Kurre and others vs. Stste of ChhaWsgarh and others (Writ Petition (S.) No.5191 of 2006), dated 3-10-2006. 2. For ffie aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of !n terms of the decision of {his Court in the matter of Har PrasacS Kurre and othefs vs. of ChhaWsgarh and others (Supra). Noorderastocoste. ___ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Qopal