: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.184 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2345 OF 2005 Smt.Sangeeta L. Gupta ..Petitioner. Vs. Shri Sanjay Kumar The Secretary, Education Deptt. & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.A.L.Gore for the Petitioner. Mr.D.A.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.A.J.Bhor for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Mr.S.S.Shah for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The order dated 6.3.2006 of the Division Bench of which contempt is alleged, directs the management to forward the proposal to the Education Officer and the Education Officer to decide the same. The order kept open to the management to contend as to why the Petitioner was not entitled to the appointment. 2. The above order has been complied with. In that, the management forwarded the proposal and the Education Officer has taken a decision. It is true that the decision is in favour of the Petitioner. The management however intends challenging the : 2 : decision. 3. There is nothing in the order which prevents the management from doing so. In fact, as noted earlier, the contentions of the management in this regard were kept open. It is also open to the Petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings to have the order of the Education Officer enforced. 4. However, considering the nature of the contempt proceedings, it is not possible in these circumstances to take any action against the Respondents in contempt. 5. With the above observations, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. ***