... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4332 OF 2001 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.42317 OF 1999 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 28, 2006. : APRIL 28, 2006. : APRIL 28, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Office noting shows that the Application already stands dismissed as against the Respondent No.1. The Respondent No.2 is represented by an Advocate. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). It is clarified that even First Appeal stands dismissed as against the Respondent No.1. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE