IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.-T- No. 2891 of 2008. Decided on 29th April, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Gur Devi and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Tim Saran, Advocate vice Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioners, in a nut-shell, is that though they had completed more than 10 years’ uninterrupted service with 160 days in a block of twelve calendar months, however, their case has not been considered for conferment of work charge status/regularization. Petitioners are only required to complete 160 days in a block of twelve calendar months since they are engaged in tribal areas. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioners for conferment of work charge status/regularization in accordance with the instructions issued from time to time, within a period of two months from the date of production of a 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. Petitioners shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge April 29, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `