W IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR r5V WRIT PETITIONS) No. ‘7 OF 2010 PETITIONER: / Prakash Kumar Singh, Aged About- 31 Years, S/o— Shri Thakur Singh, Occupation— Working as Guard at Kastagar, Forest Range Janakpur, Forest Division— Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) / RESPONDENT(Sl: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /, 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division- Distt. Manendragarh, Koriya (C.G.) K 3. Kastagar Adhikari, Forest Range Janakpur, Forest Division- Manendragarh, Distt. Koriya (C.G.) WRIT PETITI’oN‘UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ m Wm L4:.é?.:..cs)m3€~ a} (J3 mam faw mam WW Mmmm WW?W Wm %o'Wm j l :§.B.: HON’BLE JUST!CE MR. PRETINKER _'E9«12-2010: Shi‘i Vinay Pandey, counsel for the Shri Ajit Singh, PL. for the State Grievance of the petitioner in though he 1’s working in the forest 1.1'11 date his services have not been Counsel for the petitioner submits eircuiar dated 5,3.2008 issued by the every right for his regularization. He of the petitioner {Annexure P/ 3) is pending justice would be served if direction is deciding his pending representation State counsel submits that representation of the petitioner is decided further submits that let the petitioner the resp. No2 and the same would ht Jaw. Accordingiy, the petitioner is etition with liberty to make a fresh bf making any such representation by of three Weeks’ from the date of receipt expectedfrom the authority concerned iurther period of four months from the lt is made clear that/th‘ C;ourt (Fri merits of the case add the to decide the representation stn‘ctl considering all the aspects of the case. DIWAKER pcetitionar. the present petition is that department since October 1996 but regularized. that on the basis of the Covemment, the petitioner has submits that the representation and at this stage, ends of issued to’the resp. N02 for he has no objection if the in accordance with law. He inake a fresh representation to decided in accordance with permitted to withdraw this repcesentation. ln the eventuality the petitioner with in a period of copy of this order, it is to decide the same Within a cate of its receipt. has not expressed any opinion aiithority‘concerned would be at iiberty in accordance with law, Sdl- yrit'mker Diwaker U