1 wp2990.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2990 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2011 The office of Tahsildar has written a letter to T.I.L.R. about alleged wrong execution of decree in Regular Civil Suit No. 151 of 2004 and because of that letter, the T.I.L.R. has issued notice to the present petitioner. 2. Mr. Palodkar learned counsel for petitioner states that the decree is already executed and respective parties are placed in their proper shares accordingly. He invites attention to the limited restraining orders passed by this Court in Second Appeal no.242 of 2008. He contends that thus possession delivered already is also protected 2 wp2990.11 because of those orders. 3. It is apparent that the petitioner can point out orders of this Court in Second Appeal to revenue authorities and also to trial Court in reply to notice at Exhibit `H' (page no.81) to the Petition. Those authorities are duty bound to take appropriate cognizance of these orders. 4. At present, I find the Petition is premature. With liberty to petitioner to take appropriate steps in the matter, the present Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp2990 .11