IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21602 of 2009 AMIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.07.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under section 394 IPC. As per allegations in the FIR, while the victim (Subodh Kumar) was passing through a road in the night, four persons intercepted him. He was assaulted with butt of a pistol by one of them and thereafter the accused persons relieved him of his belongings including a mobile and some cash amount. On Hulla, a chase was offered by the people including the first informant of this case. Thereafter two accused persons including the petitioner are said to have been arrested. The statement of the victim was also recorded wherein he has precisely supported the manner of occurrence as also the fact that two accused persons were arrested on chase. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26. 01.2009 and that he does not carry any criminal antecedent. It is further contended that he has not been put on TIP. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after seven months, if in the meanwhile the trial of the case is not taken up. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )