pvr ca35-11-lpal890-11 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.890 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5198 OF 2010 Mr.Al Farook Kably. ...Applicant vs. Mrs.Zain Al Farook Kably ...Respondent --- Applicant in person present. Mrs.Mrunalini Deshmukh i/b. Janghiani Narulla & Associates, for Respondent --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED: 11th April,2011 P.C.: 1. Heard. The civil application is granted and the delay condoned. Civil application is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) pvr ca35-11-lpal890-11 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.890 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5198 OF 2010 Mr.Al Farook Kably. ...Appellant vs. Mrs.Zain Al Farook Kably ...Respondent --- Appellant in person present. Mrs.Mrunalini Deshmukh i/b. Janghiani Narulla & Associates, for Respondent --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED: 11th April,2011 P.C.: 1. Heard. The petition filed by the petitioner was under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. That petition has been dismissed by the order which is impugned in the appeal. An appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent does not lie against an order made in the pvr ca35-11-lpal890-11 petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, when the petitioner himself had filed that petition. The Letters patent appeal is, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.)