IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.21605 of 2008 Date of Decision: 23.12.2008 Riasat Ali ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.S. Khehar. Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. J.S. KHEHAR, J. (ORAL) Notice at this stage to the learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 only. On our asking, Mr. S.K. Bishnoi, D.A.G., Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, after having gone through the pleadings in the instant writ petition, states that it is not necessary to file a formal reply to the averments made in the writ petition. He also acknowledges that the controversy raised in the instant case is identical to the one, adjudicated upon by this Court in “R.K. Suneja and another vs. State of Haryana and others (CWP No.9517 of 2008, decided on 10-11-2008). In view of the above, learned counsel for the rival parties are CWP No.21605 of 2008 -2- agreed that the instant writ petition be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in R.K. Suneja's case (supra). Ordered accordingly. The petitioner shall appear before respondent No.2, either in person or through counsel on 28-01-2009. (J.S. KHEHAR) JUDGE (NIRMALJIT KAUR) December 23, 2008 JUDGE gurpreet