p^' •^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C^NO. ^,Ei5 /2011 7 •togle Benct Arising out of order dated 06"11-2009 (Kundan Lal B,ambesar vs. Union of India & Ors.) passed in Writ Petition N(3"f326/2002 by Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri) APPLICANT : ^Kundan Lal Bambesar _ S/o Late Nand Lal Bambesar, aged about 40 years; village & P.0.: Mahud Machandur, P.S.: Chauki, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS L.) Union of India, through: The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, 13-C.G.O. Complex, Ministry of Home Affairs, Lodhi Road, New Delhi /%^ /\\»^) ^e Deputy InspectorGeneral, Central Industrial /y//\ Security Force (S.Z.), (Ministry of Home Affairs), Rajaji Bhawan, Basant Nagar, Chennai-90 RESPONDENTS ^//A' <^^y^ The Inspector General (S.W.S.), Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs), CISF RCFL Complex, Chembur, Mumbai-74 The Commandent, Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs), CISF, 6 Resbn, Arakkonam (Tamilnadu) The Principal, Centrallndustrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs), R.T.C. Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) ; The Group Commandent, Central Industrial Security Foree, (Ministry of Home Affairs), Group Head Office, Kochin, Vennala, Post: Kochin- 28 APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OFWRIT PETITION No.1326/2002 DISMISSED FORWANT OF PROSECUTION ON 06-11-2009 ^- HtGHCQURTQFCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR ADDlicant M.C.C.No.655 OF 2011 Kundan Lal Bambesar VERSUS Union of Indte & Others Resoondente APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION N0.1326/2002 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agrfihotri. J. Present: Shri Ashish Surana, Advocatefor the applicant. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate for the Union of India ORDER . ; (Passed on this 26th day of September, 2011) !.A.No.1 This is an application for withdrawal of the petiUon filed for restoration ofWrit Petition No.132®2002,on the grounds stated therein. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. Applicatton is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the M.C.C. is dismissed as withdrawn. _____ Sd/- SatishK.Agnib°tn Judge ashok vsss''^'