IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18268 of 2008 PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA, son of late-Baijnath Prasad Gupta, resident of Baijnath Bhawan, P.O.-Dalmian Nagar, P.S.-Dhri, District-Rohtas. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through Department of Food & Civil Supplies, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Central Ware Housing Corporation through its Managing Director, Ware Housing Bhawan, 4/1, Siri Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, Hoz Khas, New Delhi-110016. 3. The Managing Director, Central Ware Housing Corporation, Ware Housing Bhawan, 4/1, Siri Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, Hoz Khas, New Delhi-110016. 4. The Regional Manager, Central Ware Housing Corporation, regional Office, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbanglow Road, Patna-1. 5. B.K.Jha, son of name not known to the petitioner, Member Tender Committee-cum-Senior Area Manager, Central Ware Housing Corporation, regional office, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbanglow Road, Patna-1. -------Respondents. ----------- 02. 23.04.2009 Petitioner had filed tender in the capacity of a partner of a Firm. Technical bid having been accepted, while waiting for the financial bid to be opened, after about ten months suddenly his technical bid is rejected and earnest money refunded. No reason is disclosed. Petitioner on his own has given reason why such an action was taken. The reason states is that the Firm of which petitioner claims to be the partner, for some reason, other partner sent a legal notice to the petitioner dissolving the partnership Firm. A copy of this legal notice, someone made available to the Corporation. Once a partner express his desire to dissolve 2 partnership Firm then the Firm ceased to be in its existence. Petitioner’s tender as a partner of the said Firm became infructuous as partnership Firm itself ceased to exist. Petitioner states that he talked to his partner and he stated that it was certain legal compulsion, he had to sent that notice. Be that as it may, the very moment a partner of a partnership Firm concerned having two partners withdraws from partnership then the legal entity ceased to exist. If that be so, then the very basis for which the petitioner has made his tender stood withdrawn. In view of these facts, I have no reason to interfere in this writ application, the same is dismissed as such. Shageer (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)