IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.517 of 2009 Rajesh Kumar Dutt Verma, son of Late Ganesh Prasad Verma, resident of village Sudha Nilyam, E/3, Sadhnapuri, Gardanibagh, Patna-800001. -Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 3. Investigating Officer of Shastrinagar P.S. Case No.336/07. 4. The Officer Incharge/Investigating Officer of Mahila Koshang, situated in the campus of Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 5. The Officer Incharge of Police Station, Gardanibagh, Patna. 6. Superintendent of Police (Weaker Section), Crime Investigation Department (C.I.D.), Bihar, Patna. -Respondents. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv. Mr. Imtyaz Ahmad, Adv. Mr. Ravi Ranjan-I, Adv. For the Informant : Mr. S.D. Sanjay. For the State : Mr. Ramchandra Pd. Bharti, SC-14. ----------- 06 06.10.2009 The petitioner and his son, Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma were made accused in a case instituted by the wife of Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code, read with other Sections. The petitioner had granted bail in the said case. Petitioner’s son, who was the husband of the informant tried up to the Apex Court for bail in anticipation of arrest without success. The Trial Court initiated process for his arrest. At the bar serious criticisms has been made in the way Criminal Trial Court proceeded, but it is unnecessary to go into it, because ultimately processes under Section 83 Cr.P.C. having been issued against Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma (petitioner’s son), which was sought to be executed against the property of the petitioner (father), that brought the petitioner to this Court. - 2 - Though, the informant is not a party, informant has appeared and brought to the notice of this Court that this Court in another proceedings have stayed all coercive steps taken as against Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma (the son) for securing his presence. Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner accepts the position in the Court. It appears that as all coercive processes against Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma (the son) have been stayed by this Court. It naturally flows that the process under Section 83 Cr.P.C. as issued against the said Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma, which is sought to be executed against petitioner’s property, automatically stands withdrawn/ lapsed. It cannot be acted upon. That being the position, this application has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)