... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1468 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1468 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1468 OF 2005 IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.928 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.928 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.928 OF 2005 ...................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ...................................................... Shri Uday Warunjikar for the Applicant. Ms Smita Mane for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 13, 2006. : MARCH 13, 2006. : MARCH 13, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. Second Appeal is already admitted for final hearing. Hence, ad-interim relief granted earlier deserves to be continued subject to condition that the Applicant will not create third party interests and will not part with possession of the suit property. 2. Hence, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition that the Applicant will not create any third party interests in respect of the suit property and will not part with the possession of the suit property in favour of any third party. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE