IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42916 of 2009 SUDHIR MISHRA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 06.01.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under sections 379 and 411 IPC. Annexure-1 would show that his prayer for bail was earlier considered and rejected by this Court under order dated 10.09.2009. He was, however, granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after three months. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only three prosecution witnesses till date have been examined in the case. It is next contended that the petitioner is in custody for about seven months. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of RJM, Katihar in connection with Rail Katihar P.S.Case No. 41/2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member and that he shall appear on each date fixed in trial. In case of default in appearance on two consecutive dates, the bail bonds of the petitioner shall be cancelled by the trial court. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )