1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3283 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 976 OF 2009 Sukhdeo Tukaram Jadhav … Applicant. Vs Altaf Dastagir Pakhali … Respondent. Mr. Shitalkumar Kamble i/b Umesh R. Mankapure for the Applicant. Mr. Mahesh R. Shinde i/b P.P. Killedar for the Respondent. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED: 22nd January, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2 The learned counsel for the Applicant-Appellant, who is original Opponent, makes a statement that entire decretal amount has been deposited before the Tribunal. Therefore, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer 2 clause (b). However, the Claimant/Respondent shall be allowed to withdraw half of the amount. The balance half amount shall be invested in a nationalized Bank initially for a period of three years, to be renewed from time to time till final disposal of the Appeal. 2 Application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA, J.)