1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2007 IN IN IN P.I.L. NO. 3 OF 2008 P.I.L. NO. 3 OF 2008 P.I.L. NO. 3 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. Anant Hari Padhye Gurjar & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. P.M. Patil for Petitioners. None for Respondents. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. R.M. SAVANT, JJ. R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. DATE: 4TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. . In view of the fact that the ad-interim order passed by this court came to be confirmed at the time of admission of the petition on 14.1.2004, it will not be proper to vacate the interim order. But, considering the grievance made by the State relating to loss of revenue the hearing of the petition is expedited. 2 2. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.) (R.M. Savant, J.)