IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3773 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.3773 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.3773 OF 2003 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.25401 OF 2003 APPEAL ST.NO.25401 OF 2003 APPEAL ST.NO.25401 OF 2003 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JUNE 6, 2006. JUNE 6, 2006. JUNE 6, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This Application is for condonation of delay in preferring Appeal against the order dated 25th June 2002 passed by the learned Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli. The order impugned has been passed on an application under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. As held by the Full Bench of this Court, the First Appeal against the said order is not maintainable. As the Appeal itself is not maintainable, application for condonation of delay need not be entertained. Accordingly, application is rejected. Consequently, the Appeal also stands dismissed. However, it is clarified that notwithstanding the dismissal of the Appeal, it will be open for the Applicant to adopt appropriate remedy for challenging the impugned Judgment and Order. Judge. Judge. Judge.