Civil Revision No.3865 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3865 of 2010 Date of decision : 30-06-2010 Abhimanyu Soni .... Petitioner VERSUS Shree Bharat International and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate and Mr. Harpreet Sandhu, Advocate, for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Ex parte order of eviction, passed against the respondent, was later on set aside by the Rent Controller and it was ordered that the tenant should be put back into possession. Today, during the course of arguments, a broad consensus has been arrived at between the parties that in case ejectment petition is decided on merits within stipulated period, it will save the parties from further complication. This Court is of the view that due sanctity ought to be granted to the broad consensus arrived at between the parties. Parties are in agreement that three effective opportunities for leading the evidence ought to be granted to both the sides and Rent Controller be requested to decide the eviction petition within three months on or before 30.09.2010. Mr. Mahajan, Advocate states that pleadings of the case, before trial Court are yet to be completed. Civil Revision No.3865 of 2010 -2- Sh. Chadha, Advocate has stated that on 16.07.2010 itself written statement shall be filed in the Court and a copy of the same shall be supplied to the petitioner prior in time so that replication is also filed on that date. Considering the arrangement divulged by the counsel for the parties, following directions are issued:- 1. Respondent-tenant shall supply a copy of the written statement to the petitioner on or before 10.07.2010. It is further agreed that to save further objections copy of the written statement shall be supplied to counsel for the petitioner Sh. Raman Mahajan, Advocate. 2. The written statement shall be furnished in the Court on 16.07.2010. On that day, parties through their counsel shall appear before the Rent Controller. 3. The Rent Controller shall afford three effective opportunities to both the parties and decide the revision petition within three months. 4. Based upon a broad consensus formulated between the parties, the order passed by the Rent Controller setting aside the ex parte eviction is upheld, subject to the final order to be passed by the Rent Controller. 5. In case, Rent Controller dismisses the application for eviction, tenant shall be put back to Civil Revision No.3865 of 2010 -3- possession. 6. As agreed till the final decision is pronounced by the Rent Controller, status quo, as it exist today, regarding the possession and nature of the property shall be maintained. Disposed of. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 30-06-2010 JUDGE manju