HieH GOURT OF CHHATTIS»3ARHAT BIU^PIW WRITPETfflONtSl N0:3099 Qf2007^ PETtTtONER RESPONDENTS Smt Jayashri Sarkar, W/o Ashutosh Sarkar, Aged about 35 years, PresenUy posted and worldng as Lechjrer, Govemment Natwar Mulfi hHgher Secondary School, Raigarh (CG) V6RSUS 1. State of ChhatUsgarh Through the Secretary, Daparbnent of EducaUon, D.K.S. Buiiding, Mantralaya, Raipur, ChhatUsgarti. 2. District Education Offlcer, Dist Raigarh 3. Principal, Govemment Natww MulU Higher Secondary School, Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SingteBench : Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSatish K. ^nihotri Present: Mr. Rajendra TripaUii, Advocate tor the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General wUi Mrs. Anju Ahi^a, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER ^assed on 12" day of June, 2007) Leamed counsel appeanng for the peUttoner as well as for the State/respondents jolntly submit Uiat the fact and questton Qf taw invoh/ed in the present wrtt peUUon are the s»ne to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Nlunicipri Corporatien, Durg and another (2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been dispesed of vtote orcter dated (B.04.2006. Lwrned coynsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. Accordingty. the writ peUtion is allowad in terms ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kunun' Bharadwaj Vs. lyiunfejpal Corporation, Durg and anotter (Supra), subject to verilKaatton a< the factas to whether tHe petUioner has acquired B.Ed. Exairtnatton CerUficate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1^8 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid bwo advance Increments or not. No order as to cosls. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge