IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH COCP No.2021 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: March 20, 2012 Arun Bansal ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS P.K. Uppal ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** PRESENT: - Pt. Hari Om Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for the respondent. . . . Surya Kant, J (Oral) C.M. No.7399-CII of 2012 Application is allowed. Written statement of the respondent alongwith documents, Annexure R-1 and R-2, is taken on record. COCP No.2021 of 2011 [2] COCP No.2021 of 2011 1. In view of the speaking order passed by the respondent which the petitioner has already challenged, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition. 2. Disposed of as not pressed. 3. Rule discharged. (Surya Kant) March 20, 2012 Judge avin