IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17139 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 19.03.2009 Ramesh Chand Saini .... PETITIONER Versus The Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. K.L. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Walia and Mr. J.P. Bhatt, Advocates, for the respondents. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioner was working as Sweeper on daily wage basis. Subsequently, his services were regularised as Sweeper. Thereafter, he became eligible for the post of Clerk to be filled by way of promotion against 25% quota of promotion meant for Class IV employees. In the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to consider him for promotion to the post of Clerk against the aforesaid quota of 25%. He was found eligible for promotion against the said quota post. Therefore, he was called for typing test. The said test was adjourned twice by the respondents. On third date i.e. on 6.2.2009, the CWP No. 17139 of 2006 -2- petitioner could not appear for the said typing test, because unfortunately his mother had expired. Counsel for the respondents states that in view of the representation filed by the petitioner in terms of the order dated 10.2.2009, passed by this Court in this case, the respondents are ready to take the typing test of the petitioner. He may appear for the said test on 30.3.2009. He further states that in case, the petitioner clears the test, then he will be considered for promotion in accordance with the rules. The offer made by counsel for the respondents is acceptable to counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, so far as the claim of the petitioner that since the year 1985, he has discharged the duties of Clerk, therefore, he should be paid salary for the post of Clerk, is concerned, it will be open for him to make a representation to the authorities. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges. March 19, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE