IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13841 of 2008 TEK NARAYAN RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.5.2008 This is an application for grant of regular bail in a case under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code for snatching a motorcycle on the point of pistol against three unknown miscreants. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant though not named the petitioner in the first information report but he named the petitioner in his further statement. He submits that some other witnesses have named the petitioner with whom the petitioner has got enmity. He, therefore, submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and is in custody since 20th of December, 2007. So, he prays for grant of bail. Learned State counsel after perusal of the case diary submits that the informant has not named the petitioner in the first information report but he has named the petitioner in his further statement on the basis of talk amongst the miscreants taking name of one another. He submits that one witness stated that he had seen the petitioner going on a motorcycle taking name of one another. He admits that the petitioner was not put on T.I.P. Considering the submissions made and the period of detention, the petitioner, TekNarayan Rai, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Riga P.S.Case No.91 of 2007. Md.S. (Anwar Ahmad)