aw n. I& THE MADEYR P&AD$Sn STaTE ADMLNISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL P£IHCIP$L B§NCH AT J&B&LPUR§M.fLl KNPwwgawD&mUTsa iéAés,$?b saax J.R.PATEL, occU:A$$TT.DRAFT$ maN PENERA wATwR REsoURGEs ROAD,DISTTgBILaS?Ua(M.F.). DlvxSION, -Versus- 1)STATE OF MAaHYA ?R&D3$H: THRGUGH: SEGEETARX, 'WATER §$L£ABH REsOURcEs BHAwA§,BH§PAL(M:E.). Dw?&RTMQHT, 2)ENGINEER-xN-GHIEF, HATER RE$0u§EEs DE?&RTEENT, MAEHYg PBADggH,BH0PAL(M.P.). 5)$HRI sugESH GHonE, 0/6:EXEGUT1VE ENGINEER, JAE DISTT:CHEINbw&RA(M.y.). SRN$ADHAN DIVISIDN(SURVEY) 4)SHRI SUNgRRLgL maHonaY o/o EXEG§§IVE EmGiNEER, NARMADA V1K£$ EIVISI0«, MARMADA NAG&R,KHAND%A(M.P.). DETRILS OF AFFLECATION ‘h... .._ ‘..w .._.,,1.Em7.,n,m . HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH z BILASPUR @ Writ Petition (S1 No. 1244 of 2005 Petitioner K. N. Patel Respondents . Vcrsus State Chhattisgarh) of 8a Madhya others Pradesh (now Sau'sh K. Agm'houi J.) (SB: Hon’ble Shli None for the petitioner. Panel Lawyers for the Shri N. N. Roy and Shri A. V. Shn'dhar, respondents] State. 0 R D E R oral} 2009 ) 1m ( Passed on this 13th day of November, ‘ hearing twice. On both the occasions 1. The matter is called for of the none appeam nor any representation is made on behalf maynot be interested in prosecuting peu'tioner. The petitioner the matter. 2. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of A copy of this order shall be sent to the petitioner prosecution. forthwith. ere Sdl- Sans/i1 K. Agniimtri .‘gdge/