ssp 1 WP 1554 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1554 OF 2011 Dr.Kapila Ratilal Mehta and Ors. .....Petitioners versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Anr. ..... Respondents Mr.Subir Kumar, for the petitioners. Ms.P.A.Purandare, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.S.N.Vaishnawa i/by N.N.Vaishnawa & Co., for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 08 th SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. By the above petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the substantive reliefs sought is that the Assistant Commissioner of respondent No.1 Corporation, be directed to hear the petitioner while deciding the representation of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in respect of the regularization in respect of Flat Nos.1 and 2. As can be seen, the regularization of the alterations carried out in the Flat Nos.1 and 2 is a contentious issue between the petitioners and respondent Nos.3 and 4. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it proper to direct the Executive Engineer (Building Proposals) of the respondent No.1 Corporation to also hear the petitioner whilst deciding ssp 2 WP 1554 of 2011 the representation for regularization of Flat Nos.1 and 2. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )