-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2561 OF 2005 Rajeev Ratanlal Kakani and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr. Ganesh Gole Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 20, 2005 DATE : JUNE 20, 2005 DATE : JUNE 20, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of process issued by the learned J.M.F.C.Ulhasnagar in C.C.No. 323 of 2002. The said process was issued under Sections 498-A, 504, 506 r.w.34 of IPC. 3. For the reasons recorded in my order dated 8th June, 2005 in Cri.Application No. 645 of 2005 and order dated 13th June, 2005 in W.P.No. 213 of -2- 2005, in my view, it is clear that the applicants have an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the applicants prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4. Liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned counsel for the applicants states that the necessary revision would be filed within a period of four weeks from today. Exemption in respect of personal appearance before the trial Court is granted to the applicants for a period of four weeks from today. 5. On the necessary revision being preferred by the applicant before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of. -3- [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]