%l%® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPR U wm PETITION (s) No. Rwo OF 2011 PETITIONER : . Sheeml Kumar' Sharma S/o Shri Bascmf Kumar Sharma, aged abouf 36 year's, Previously working as Assismm Revenue Inspector, Nagar Panchaya’r. Rajim Distric? Raipur' (C.G.) R/o— C/o Shri N.K.Sharma, 5y Hnauman Gali, Brahman Para. 0,9271.... v Raipur"(C.G.) $1 N? . VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 O THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /1 g F RESPONDENTS : / 1. The Sfafe of Chhaf?isgarh, Through The Principal Secre’rary, Departmenf of Urban Administrafion and Development, Manfmlaya af D.K.$. BhaWan, Raipur' (CG). The Under Secrefary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Nagar Panchayat RaJIm through its Chief Mumcupal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Rajim, District Raipur (CG). H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1206 OF 2011 Petitianer Sheetal Kumar Sharma Resnondents The State 0f Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of lndia) Versus Singie Bench 1 Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER tORAL) (Passed on 4’“ day of March, 201 1) At the very outset, teamed counsei appearing for the parties jointly and fairiy submit that the issue involved in the present petition as welt as in Dham’ram & Others v, State of Chhattisgam & Others’, which was considered and decided by this Court on 20.01.2011, are identical. Thereafter, the said issue was re- considered in Virendra Des Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chhat‘tisgarh & Oihersz, by this Court on 10.02.2011. Thus, the instant petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in Dhaniram & Others’ and Virendra Des Manikpuri & i. Others? in View of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the orders passed in Dhaniram & Others7 and Virendra Des Manikpuri & Others? M, .. - Sd/- ,2 ashok sATisn K, ANGNIHORI Judge M ivvrzrsi No. 6798 of 2010, decided on 20.1 .2011 2 were) No. 7450 or 2010 , decided on 10.2.2011