c^ [er^6^^ ^iNeiE g^g^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(SINO. 5365 /20ii /"" PETITIONER :^vo::'£^':: rv^v-""\.^tr xP^'"" J.r. /11 RESPONDENTS ^ ^y^54 \''^. ^.> '^^ {^3^.V^ \ ( fe^^^i^^-] f ^^<^' ^' Anas Ram Dhruv, S/o Patiram Dhruv, aged about 30 years, working as Van Rakshak (forest guard) Dornapal, R/o village Dornapal, Tahsil and Distt. Dantewada, (C.G.). VERSUS .^"" : 1. State of Chhattisgarh- Through :- The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. " Chief Conservator of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, Distt. /Raipur (C.G.). 3. Divisional Forest Officer, Sukma, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIOH COURT OF CHHATTTSOARH AT BTTASPUR PRTITTONRR WMT PETmON (S) No. 5363 of2011 Arsa^ Ram T)niv. RESPONDENTS •VRR8U8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSnTUTtON OF INDIA 8B: Hon'Ne Shri Satisli K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Sfari NX.Chatterje^ Advocate for th@ petitioner. Sliri Shasharik Thakur^ Paael LawyCT for the Slate/respondenls. ORDER (Passed on 12ttldayofSeptember, 2011) 1, Leamed coimsel appearing for tlie petitioiier submite that vide order dated 15,07.2010 (Ajmexiire P/l), the petitioner^ working as Fore^t Guard at Raage Domapal, Fore^t Division Sukma, Jagdalpw^ias been traasferred to Raipun on tfae option ofthe CoBservator ofForest on his own reqyeat. Howevcr^ ttie petitioner has not yet been rdieved to joifi the new plaee of posting^ Shri Chatterjee fiirther submite that once the prder oftransfar has be^n passed, it is for the govemment to easiire that it is complied with immediately, He relies on a decision of the Siroreme Court in SreQdam Chandra Ghash v, State ofAssam & athers^, m support of his contentiosi tfaat ifthe order is not complied witlx, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof 2, Leamed coimsel appearmg for the State/respondente siibmite that that ifthe traasfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Anneaire P/l) is still in exNenee and has not been complied with, appropriate steps woyld be takento comply withthe order. 3. If the aforesaid traa^fer order m still m existence, the gov€rs3ment is imder an obligation to comply with the same at once, It is accordmgly directed that the traasfer order shall be complied with forthwith^ within a period oftwo weeks, 4 Accordmgly, this petitiosi b disposed of, j Sd/- 1 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1(1996)10SCG567