IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1308 of 2009 ***** Suresh Kumar Sahni, Son of Shri Ram Chandrar Sahni, resident of village Guddar Ghat, P.O.-Sripur Gahar, P.S.Kahnpur, District-Samastipur. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2. Sri R.J.M. Pillaee, the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Sri Tripurari Saran, Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 6. Deepak Prasad, Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 7. The District Magistrate cum the District Officer, Samastipur. 8. Asanguwa Chuwa Aaoo, District Magistrate, Samastipur. 9. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur. 10. Anirudh Prasad, Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur. 11. Sri Uday Kumar, the S.D.O., Sadar, Samastipur. 12. Ashok Kumar Jha, the District Supply Officer on Special (OSD), Samastipur. 13. Sri Narayan Das, Assistant District Supply Officer, Samastipur. 14. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Block Marketing Officer cum-Block Supply Officer, Khanpur, Samastipur. 15. Ramashankar Prasad, Circle Officer-Cum-Block Development Officer, Khanpur Block, Samastipur. 16. Nirmala Devi, Mukhiya, Sripur Gahar East Grampanchayat Block, Kahnpur, District-Samastipur. 17. Ashok Kumar Singh, son of Sri Foolchand Mandal. 18. Dev Narayan Rai son of Late Rameshwar Rai 19. Chardra Bali Mahto son of Late Ishwar Mahto. Respondent no. 17 to 19 are Dealers of Public Distribution System and resident of Village+post-Sripur Gahar, P.S. Khanpur, District- Samastipur. 20. Ram Bilas Ram, Up-Mukhiya, Sripur Gahar Panchayat Khanpur Block, Samastipur. 21. Panchayat Secretary, Sripur Gahar Panchayat. .... …. Performa Respondents 2nd set ----------- 2. 16.4.2010. It is submitted by Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, - 2 - learned counsel appearing for the contemnors that the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 10438 of 2008 has already been complied with. Be it noted, the learned counsel has made such a statement on the basis of the show cause filed by the contemnors. Thus, we are not inclined to proceed with the proceeding for contempt and, accordingly the same stands dropped. Pawan/- (Dipak Misra, CJ) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)