S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATIONNO.2715/2006 Date : 07.07. 2006 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Rajesh Kumar for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is a lady and co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 23.5.2006 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2104/2006, therefore, the present applicant may also be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submission made before me and the material available on record. It is correct that prima facie allegations are against the applicant in relation to forging documents, however, in view of the fact that she is having two kids, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of applicant Smt. Om Kanwar wife of Tara Chand by I.O./S.H.O. in FIR No.357/2005 P.S. Nohar, District Hanumangarh, she shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- alongwith two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer on the following conditions:- (i)That she shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii)That she shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and; (iii)That she shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.