IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3486 of 2009 BAIDYA NATH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 24.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The licence of the petitioner under the Arms Act having been cancelled by the District Magistrate, when the same was made subject matter of an appeal the Commissioner has remitted the matter back for reconsideration by the District Magistrate. All these happened some two years back because the order of the Commissioner was passed on 10.1.2007 and still the District Magistrate does not find time to either comply the order of the Commissioner or to redress the grievance of the petitioner. As a result thereof, the arm of the petitioner is still lying in the custody of the respondent and the very purpose of the licence has been frustrated. In that view of the matter, this Court would direct the District Magistrate, Sitwan to comply the order of the Commissioner dated 10.1.2007 and pass necessary orders as with regard to revival/ 2 cancellation of the licence of the petitioner in accordance with law. Such an order must be passed within a period of four months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/