IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40597 of 2010 GANESH ROY, S/o Opin Roy @ Upendra Roy, R/o Vill.- Alampur, P.S. – Azam Nagar, Distt.- Katihar Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Azam Nagar P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010, for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. It was alleged by the informant that the petitioner was having illicit relation with the wife of the deceased who was none else but the wife of younger brother of the husband of the informant. The informant had alleged that after hearing noise she arrived there and she has witnessed the petitioner fleeing away. The informant has made specific allegation against the petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, I don’t find any material to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail stands rejected. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, that in the case diary, save and except, 2 allegation of illicit relationship, there is nothing on record. The court is of the opinion that the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is exactly contrary to the allegation made in the F.I.R. Petition stands rejected. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)