IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.939 of 2008 MAUJI LAL SINGH SON OF LATE RAMAUTAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PYARE CHAK, P.O. SARWAN, P.S. ARWAL DISTRICT ARWAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HIGHER SECONDARY DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIAHR, VIKAS BHAWAN, SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, DIRECTORATE PROVIDENT FUND, PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. COLLECTOR, JEHANABAD, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 4. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, JEHANABAD, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, JEHANABAD, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 6. THE TREASURY OFFICER, ARWAL, DISTRICT ARWAL. ----------- 02. 26.03.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present and submits that the entire GPF amount is paid with admissible interest as stated in paragraph -9 of the counter affidavit which has not been controverted in the rejoinder. Moreover, this writ application is filed after inordinate long delay. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)