r<:. & ^p HIQH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petitioa (81 No. 873 of 2009 Petitioner Respondents Smt. Sangiuee Ekka, W/o. Shri Basant Kalyan Ekba, aged about 40 years, aged aboilt 40 years, Assistaat Teacher in Priinar School Jajagi, Tahsfl Aiubikapur, Distt. Surguja (CG), R/o. ViBage Jhirauli, Distt. Siu^uja (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh throuRh the Secretaiy, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur 2) The District Education.OIBcer, Suiyija, Distt. Surguja (CG). ] 3) The Block Education Officer, Udaipur, S-iurguja, Distt. Sui^uja (CG). (Writ Petition u-nder Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satlsh K. Agniiiotri, J. Presest: Mr. Bbupendra Singh, coiinsel &r fhe petiuoner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for th.e State. (Fassed on this ll*b day of February, 2009) Wifh consent of learaed couiisel appeariitg for bofh the parties, fhc inatter is heard finallv. 2) Leanied counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to graut of two iacreinents as she has obtauied tiie D.Ed. certifieate 0x1. her pwn expenses durmg the service period. Eeamed couiisel furfher submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to laake a representation to fhe aufhorities for graat of two iacreinents piirsuaat to the judgiaent aad order passed by this 2.' ^ Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. aauaicipal Corporatioa, Diug aad aaother {2006 (II) MPJR -CG 96}. 3) The State Govenuiient is uiider an obHgatiou to foUow fhe law settled by tilis Court aad it is not necessaiiy to approach this Court by each aad eveiy employee when the law bas already been setfled by this Court. The employees, who are sinularly situated aad have not approached the Court, miay be treated at par with ofher einployees, who have approached tbis Court. It is not aecessary to approach this Court for sinular order. 4) In view of tlie foregoiag reasons, this petition staads disposed of with Uberty reserved to the petitioner, on. the request QI learaed counsel, to inake a representation. If fhe representation is ffled by the petiti.oner, tue same may be considered and decided, in. accordan.ee with law on its own luerit as expeditiously as possible, preferably withia a period of e^hts weeks feom the date of receipt of the representation. —[ R^a Sdf- \ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge