( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4413 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4413 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4413 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.465 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO.465 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO.465 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2775 OF 1992 Raghunath D.Khachane .. Appellant V/s Mrs.Vatsala Premchand Sarwal & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.N.M.Ganguli for the Appellant. Ms.Pallavi Dedhia for Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 8th February, 2008. DATE : 8th February, 2008. DATE : 8th February, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay caused in filig the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)