IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23877 of 2008 DAROGA MAHTO & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 11.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Apprehending their arrest in Complaint Case No. 473/2007 (Tr. No. 2593/2008), registered under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 387 of the IPC, the petitioners Daroga Mahto, Jamadar Mahto, Kirani Mahto, Mangal Mahto and Janardan Mahto, who have been refused anticipatory bail by the Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, have filed this petition for anticipatory bail. Today, the petitioners have filed supplementary affidavit. Except Section 387 and all other Sections i.e. 223, 341, 504 of the IPC. In the supplementary affidavit it has been clearly stated that no such L.T.I. or document is in possession of the petitioner and any accused persons so as to be used in future at any point of time. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner above named are admitted to anticipatory bail and in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikerahana, Motihari, in connection with Complaint Case No. 473/2007(Tr. No. - 2 - 2593/2008) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjeet (Subash Chandra Jha, J.)