IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. ga 1 LOF 2011. PETITIONER : x Khileshwar Joshi, Son of Makhan Das Joshi, .aged about 42 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Harmundi, Block Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS /, RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, ’ Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, v" ........ .I‘ \N$w.\‘..;2..l}n.x Raipur (C. G.) /., 2. District Education Officer, District Education Office Durg, District Durg (C. G.) (wwarmmm rmmxivmuWmwwwxwzmmmwn:mmuwmmWmmmmwmwmmw 3. Additional District Education /, Officer, Education District Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, / Block Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) 9L WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WW, m, WI Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of he having passed B.T.I. examination b fore appointment at his own cost. lt is submitted that the issue invoived the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been hn Ily decided by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxen vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 2009 (ill) MPJR (SC) 59. it is further submi ted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his order dated 06— 2—2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the p itioner further draws attention of this Court to order dated 29-04—2010 p ssed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the orde passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions hav been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance incre ents as per circular dated 21-09-1 974 issued by the State of Madhya pleaded in the petition. Learned counsel for the re pondents submits that now the State Government had issued a circula on 05-01-2011 and the case of the petitioner would be examined in he light of the decision of the State Government. radesh’, after vermcation of the facts i \N ,t){§)m@p 1m mm W 200 am ts! fra'm‘ oar straw amiss m m (We) mm oft—a 311%?! WK Wrra’i a fetal than a; atttmm SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 30-09-2011 Shri Mirza Hafeez Baig, coun l for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Depu Government Advocate for the State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. 3‘4 Tumane XLHC*78 3a W, ma,m mm‘ m 200 am WW amm writ Wm (Wu) mmmm r_ 1/ m¥r$§:;§?W In view of the statement made: above, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claimteogktwhrehgetitioner WM ..... for grant of two advance increments in view of the ‘a'Iso in view of c‘ cular, which has been issued by the fon 05-01-2011, fter verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of thre months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order § r Sdl- p‘i" Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Vi Judge