i' 6a ^ fe^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (C)No. 2566/2009 Raj Kumar Puri aged about 35 years, S/o Sukhnandan, R/o Village Pasari, Post Kalhari, Tahsil Manendragarh Distt. Korea. (C.G.). RESPONDENTS Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Rural Engineering Service Depart:ment, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur. 2. The Collector, Korea-Baikunthpur. 3. Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering service Department, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea. 4. H.K. Vishwakarma Sub Divisional officer Rural Engineering service Department, Manendragarh, Distt. Korea. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Parag Kotecha, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4, though served. ORDER (21.04.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Petitioner Raj Kumar Puri, a local resident ofvillage Pasari has filed this petition for the following reliefs:- bW ^y-^\ rfc.^ 1 'SSS!^ 1 ^-^ fs:'!-'wff W.P.CONo. 2566 of2009 "To issue direction to respondent N0.1 to initiate Departmental enquiry against respondent No.4 and to permit the petitioner to lead evidence in the inquiry against respondent no.4; to issue direction to respondents 1 to 3 to lodge the FIR against respondent No.4; to issue direction to the respondent authorities to give appropriate compensation to the petitioner for iltegal harassment; any other relief which this Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice; and to award cost ofthe petition." The petitioner thus in substance is praying for enquiry into the illegalities committed by respondent No.4 in the road construction work conducted in his supervision in 2006-07. It is submitted by Mr. Parag Kotecha that a complaint has already been made to Lok Ayog, Chhattisgarh by another complainant namely R. N. Patel in this regard. A copy of complaint has been filed as Annexure- P/4. Since a complaint • has already been made to the Lok Ayog, Chhattisgarh, though by another complainant and the inquiry can better be conducted by the Lok Ayog, lam not inclined to entertain this writ petition for further hearing. The proceedings of the writ petition are disposed at thisstage. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to participate in the enquiry before Lok Ayog in the complaint made by R.N. Patel (Annexure-P/4) or if, so desired, he may file another complaint before the said Authority. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. No Cost. Sd/. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge