: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.1664 OF 2008 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.37 OF 2008 Rohidas S. Gaikwad ....Applicant V/s. Petitioner M/s.Bagwe Udyog ....Respondent Mr.A.G. Shah for the Applicant/Petitioner. Ms.Dipti Pathak i/b Puranik & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. : 1. By an order dated 14.2.2008, the Petition was admitted. However, publication of advertisement of admission was dispensed with as the same had been ordered in Company Petition No.655 of 2000. 2. In the circumstances, the Petition which is admitted shall be advertised in Free Press Journal, Maharashtra Times and Maharashtra Government Gazette. 3. The Applicant/ Petitioner is directed to deposit cost of Rs.10,000/- within four weeks from today. 4. The Company Petition is returnable on 12th : 2 : March, 2009. 5. It appears that there are other awards passed by the Labour Court/Industrial Court. One such award is in the sum of Rs.2,08,54,000/- by the Industrial Court. There is another award in the sum of Rs.17,71,000/- passed by the Labour Court. I am further informed that these awards are outstanding and have not been set-aside. It appears that there are also proceedings before the D.R.T. adopted by the secured creditors and that some of the properties have also been ordered to be sold. Some of the workers have filed an application for intervention before the D.R.T. 6. The company has not appeared despite being served. Thus, it is necessary to protect the rights of the creditors specially the workers of the company. 7. In the circumstances, the Company Application is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). The Liquidator shall, if necessary, be at liberty to adopt proceedings before the D.R.T. to protect the rights of the creditors of the company. . All parties including the Official Liquidator to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly : 3 : authenticated by the Associate/Private Secretary of this Court.