IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35400 of 2008 SITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner and others but as final form in the meantime had been submitted not sending up them up for trial they did not appear and file their bail bonds. Now that cognizance has been taken differing with the final report fresh prayer for anticipatory bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has herself to blame for her predicament. This application is disposed of with the observation that any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order, keeping in mind that the petitioner had been granted anticipatory bail by this Court Let this order be communicated to the court of CJM Vaishali at Hajipur in Mahua PS Case No. 18/2007 by fax at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)