Civil Revision No. 34 of 2004 28.7.2009 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Civil Revision No. 34 of 2004 Mr. Anand Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent/Decree Holder has invited my attention to the order dated 22.1.2001 passed by the Assistant Collector (Ist Grade) Sadar Bilaspur, H.P. in case No. 9/9-A of 2000, titled as Sant Ram versus Bhagwan Lal, wherein partition proceeding inter se the parties has already come to an end. According to him this order has attained finality hence the present petition has become infructuous. Order taken on record. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions, but however fairly states that in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent he does not press the present petition. Under these circumstances no further order needs to be passed save and except that it shall be open for the petitioner to assail the orders dated 22.1.2001, strictly in accordance with law, and the parties shall be bound by the decree passed by this Court on 18.3.1994 and the outcome of the proceedings which may be initiated by the petitioner herein before the appropriate authorities. It shall be open for the parties to take all such pleas as may be available to them, in accordance with law. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. July 28, 2009 (PK)