•":m ^N^ ^H^ ^^M^<1 "g^ ^ (®oTro) .,.^ __ -%syAv- ^ssQ •g^4lR|ch>| (^.fel)cR) / 2010 ^^ '^^E"€^®80N qNt ^IQ •aft' ^M^tid f^TEft Ptcil'rfl 1JFT •qcp-CTidi; sTT^t as'rflei-f^i, f^iciT Rdi^*^ ^olro) ^Trf^raT^ff x ^ ^ i. ^r ^N, ~^ 26 ci^, 3TO ^ : ftc|t^.^^^l4ra,I J^^^^ <i6<fl<?i t'fNw Kl^i^i^, ^PTFO) 2. '??n^ ^, ^ ^^ , q^ft -;^ro •^l' ^iRicb R^i^ Trra eT^r ag^o1 feR^ f^TcTT Roll^^ (SO^ 3. ^f^<iaii4l3n'o^t'^'<'q'<i+i'yd'rii4l Flc||^ 4^141'il efre^ Gfg'rfl<?1 f^gT, fyfpTT Rell'M^ ^WTO) 4. fq-Mq [6|<r^<I OTOf^TO 819, ^ST^ 3f4l<J4'ie, yltiWKi ^l^^ gf?r ^fui'i. ^iy^ctti^ .sfl- ycb^h^T^ ^sno Mt WT^ Nc^^^ f?@Rft •iHd M<?H ^FTC; ^m^. <1S>tTl<?f 'cT 1vT?fT •^TOg?, ;®OTTO ll^--^..' ^i^ ^^s^.^ ^••"'{^\^r'- \sca'<<ii<ft*^u+^ St'tl^f *»*' ;B.;;l;:,!iiKiaii!Sifiatis2;>.u£..ie.u.u!i ^^.i^^^^^^^^^ -JBI. '':"• ^) ^i ^. al' s i-u w ^ ^ ^ 4. 3?s Jj NIWIT a»*)l<ti 3^ '^wwti, wAww, fs|diy^< ^.m^^.:2^.^ 200 sn^T Tra^r (yif^'i'fT) sfi^fqslfrnw wn SIR^I sniiii fe«ipd<•(rf^d olt^f SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastawi.J. inte^im 07<5.2010 Shri K.K.Khatri, cpunsei for the|petitioner. Heard. By this petition, the petitioner 16/07/09 passed by the Board of been passed staying operation of inte^im Commissioner Bilaspur, Division Bilaf 09. Petitioner is also aggrieved on Board of Revenue vide memo dated Submtesion of leamed counsef order dated 02/04/09 passed by Su( &2008-09, an appeal was prefenr^t wherein an interim order was passed| dated 02/04/09 passed by aforesaid order, respondent No.1 Revenue wherein the Board of operation of order dated 2/07/09 Dh/ision Bilaspur in Appeal case No.5|49/A-6/200 counse! for the petitioner is that o( order dated 16/07/09 has been flled,) and without deciding the case on Sub-Dh^sional Reventie pfassed vacaUng stay.on requtsition made by ] ofRevenue has remitted the records Bilha, on an application filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is tti| kept pendlng ancLof)J|ie_stherJ}an4 ':i>i«it<'i<<)i fwnT ^f frA <l»lt<;l< ^r sfflfi aii^r ^ias called in qu^tlon the order dated R|evenue whereby an interim order has order dated 02/07/09 passed by the ila^pur in Appeal Case No.5^B/A-6/2008- ^ccount of remission of records by the 1/12/09. for the petiUoner is that aggrieved by ^-Dhrisional Offieer in Appeai Ne.28/A- jd before the Commissioner Bilaspur [on 02/07/09staying execufion of order Officer in appeai. Against the pjreferred revision before the Board ef vide order dated W07109 stayed the by the Commisstofler Bilaspur, '.5|49/A-6/2008-S». Subrrfssion of teamed jgh an applteation for vacafing stay of [the same so far has not been decided- or considering the awlieatten for wbordinate Revenue Courts, the Board li oase no.105/A-6/2008-09 to Tahsildar. rejspondent No.1. Further submission of rt on one hand his application has been onan applicaUon fiied by respondent irieriis IIR?lf,<RSI-«llICT—FS'147—2/2»lB^l,00,000. T *il*«*tl(feTfl^ 3^ '*\WW*<, W^\W\<c, fsfdl'f-l^ —..t-3£&t).Alo.:...?.3.3.oJ.L2. ^^....».....^...^...»,<........^x.^. ^pp SII^T 'T^T ('i.llsi't1!) Sfl^I ^tftTRT ^ff Sn^FT (i0*ii<ii wnw ^ifci sii^i beeh thte Reh/enue decide |No,1, the relevant records have [being any order. Hesubmltethatas was; not^ pFBRey.feic the Board of Tahsiidar'il^^ceed with the i ' uTaldngiinto'wnsideration the for the petitloner, interest oTjustice the Board of Revenue to consider the petitioner at theearliest or fmatly Consequently, the Board of Revenue] on peUtioner's application for vacatin|g dispose of the Revision Petition withinfhe recetpt of copy of this order. It would) appropriate application before ttie requisitlon of relevant records as Revision Petition/consideration With this observation; the petitlcjn «M<l[ff41t*1W<!li^f fe^ <fo(<$l< i73TRCT3D^I remitted to Tahsildar vrithout there matter is pending for consideration, it to remlt the r^ord and allow ma<ter without any adjucBcaUon. p sifbmission madebythe leamed counsel wduld be served if directon is issued to ^pplicatton for vacaUng stay filed by the the Revision PetiUon iteelf on merite. |is directed to pass appropriate ordere stay granted on 16/07/09 or finally period of2 montte from the date ef be open for the petitioner to move an IBoard of Revenue with respeet to be necessary for adjudicaUon of nfiay of vacs|ttng stay applicatlon. is flnally disposed of. Man^a^sbrivastava Judge »im<liT<bto9.CTTi-R(,iRa^nT»—FS;147—2/2011)--1,00,000.