1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR P.I.L. No.54/2010 ( Ajay Rammohan Tiwari ..Vs.. Nagpur Improvement Trust & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Nirbhay Chavan, Adv. H/f. Mr. M. Anilkumar, Adv. for petitioner. Mr. M.V. Samarth, Adv. for respondent no.1. Mr. S.M. Puranik, Adv. for respondent no.2. Mr. A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respondent no.3. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & A.P. BHANGALE JJ. DATE : 18 .2. 2011 . Heard. By the present public interest litigation, the petitioner is seeking direction in public interest to the respondent to make rain water harvesting mandatory in all the buildings, houses and commercial complexes constructed within the corporation limits of Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur. It is submitted that the State Government has issued the notification dated 20/8/2009 in this regard which makes the rain water harvesting compulsory for every building by undertaking minor modification under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 and also proposes to amend the Urban Development Department’s notification dated 20th September 1993. Mr. Puranik, learned 2 counsel for the respondent no.2, has submitted that though the text of the notification dated 20/8/2009 is in respect of the city of Nagpur however, in the notification name of city is mentioned as Nashik inadvertently. Mr. Fulzele, learned A.G.P. for the respondent no.3, has submitted that the Urban Development Department shall rectify the mistake in respect of the name of the city within a period of four weeks by issuing an appropriate corrigendum within a period of four weeks from today. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of this specific statement, made by the learned A.G.P., the cause of action in the present public interest litigation no more survives, hence the same is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.