THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.7570 OF 2002 O R D E R The 1st respondent is the workman. He was working as Helper in the Defence Employees Canteen, Visakhapatnam Naval Dock Yard, Visakhapatnam since September, 1997 and from 31.5.1997, the petitioner – Management asked him not to come. Aggrieved by the same, he raised I.T.I.D.(C)15/1999 on the file of Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam. By award dated 12.12.2000, the Tribunal found that before termination, no notice or any terminal benefits were given to the workman and accordingly allowed the I.D. and directing the Management to reinstate the workman into service with back wages. Aggrieved by the same, the management filed the present writ petition. 2. When similarly situated persons, who are working as Helpers along with the 2nd respondent herein, were asked by the Management not to attend duties from 31.5.1997, they too raised I.T.I.D.(C)Nos.22 and 24 of 1997 before the Tribunal and by awards dated 21.5.1998, the Tribunal directed the management to reinstate the workman therein into service. Aggrieved by the same, the Management filed W.P.Nos.22519 and 22585 of 1999 and a Division Bench of this court by common order dated 8.6.2009, confirmed the awards of the Tribunal and the operative portion reads as under: “6. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of, keeping it open for the writ petitioner/Management to follow the due procedure as prescribed under the Industrial Disputes Act and take appropriate steps, if it is so advised. No order as to costs.” 3. Hence, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the above extracted portion of the common order dated 8.6.2009 in W.P.Nos.22519 and 22585 of 1999. No costs. AVS ------------------------------ 14—03—2011