1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JbgUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Letters Patent Appeal No. 356 of 2007 Harilal v. Sahodarabai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr J.T. Gilda, Adv for appellant. Mr M.G. Bhangde, Sr.Adv for respondent. Coram : A.M. Khanwilkar and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 17th April 2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The argument of learned counsel for appellant that the learned single Judge exceeded jurisdiction, does not impress us. Learned single Judge has analysed the factual matrix and observed that the Trial Court has completely glossed over crucial aspect of the matter which, if reckoned would lead to a different inevitable conclusion. We are in agreement with the view taken by the learned single Judge. Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed accordingly. At this stage, learned counsel for appellant requests that interim protection given to the appellant be continued till 18th 2 May 2008 to enable the appellant to carry the matter in appeal before the Apex Court, if so advised. Even though this request is opposed by learned Sr. Advocate for respondent, in our view, it is reasonable to accede to the request made by the counsel for appellant. In other words, interim arrangement, as obtained between the parties till now, shall continue to operate till 18th May 2008. Judge. Judge. H s joshi