:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.956 OF 2007 Sou. Sujnata Ashok Jagdale. ..Applicant. Vs. Sudhir P. Bhadri and anr. ..Respondents. Mr. S.D. Patil for the Applicant. Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the Respondent No.1. Mr. A.S.Shitole, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 21st July, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application filed for grant of leave to challenge the acquittal order under Section-138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The defence of the accused was that a blank cheque was stolen by the husband of the complainant when he was serving as a Supervisor in the accused company.The fact that the husband of the complainant was working in the company was not seriously disputed.The record indicates that the complainant admitted in the cross examination that she filled in the amount in words and figure on the dispute cheque in question. Once this admission is brought on record then it is also necessary for the complainant to prove that the amount filled in was the outstanding liability. In this regard fixed deposit receipt or any other documentary evidence indicating deposit with accused company is not brought on record. The admission :2: that the cheque was filled in by the complainant creates some doubt. In my view, this is not a fit case for interfering in an appeal against the acquittal. Leave is therefore, refused. Consequently, the appeal papers to be filed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)