IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2010 / 5TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2352 of 2010(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- LAKSHMI PBS, PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCE, PEERMEDU, RESIDING AT 'PARAYATH', THATTAMALA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. MR.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT (IHRD), REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, PRAJO'E TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, PRAJO'E TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CHAIRMAN, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, PRAJO'E TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. MURALI.V.S, PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCE, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR. SUJIN, SC, IHRD R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. T.T. MUHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 2352 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1 Order of the second respondent, by which the petitioner has been transferred in the middle of the year, which according to the petitioner is a motivated decision in order to accommodate the 4th respondent illegally, against the guidelines applicable for such transfers. Pointing out this alleged illegality, the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 petition before the 3rd respondent - Minister for Education, who is the Chairman of the first respondent. Petitioner seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 expeditiously. I have heard the counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 as also the learned Government Pleader. In the nature of the order, I propose to pass, I do not find it necessary to issue notice to 4th respondent at this juncture. Having considered the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 as WPC.2352 of 2010 : 2 : expeditiously as possible at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner may produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. (S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A. To Judge