WP(C) 1371/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI Heard Mr. R. C. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. Chakrabort y, learned Central Govt. Counsel, appearing for the respondents. As agreed to by learned counsels for both sides the cases are being disposed of at the admission stage on the basis of the instructions received by the learned Central Govt. Counsel and the records placed before the Court. The petitioner in WP(C) No.1318/2008, Sri Mintu Chaudhury, who belongs to the ge neral category secured 54 marks in the selection held. The petitioner in WP(C) N o.1354/2008, Saibur Rahman Barbhuiya, who also belongs to the general category s ecured 49 marks in the selection held. The petitioner in WP(C) No.1371/2008, Raj ib Kalita, who is also a general category candidate secured 46 marks in the sele ction held. The three writ petitioners, however, were not selected on the ground that they had failed to meet the eligibility conditions particularly with regar d to physical standards prescribed. The petitioners, admittedly, are entitled to the benefit of the relaxed physical standards prescribed by the advertisement f or which purpose they were required to submit the necessary certificate in the f orm prescribed by Annexure-III to the advertisement in question. As the said cer tificate was not furnished the petitioners in spite of having secured the cut of f marks (44 marks for general category candidates) were not selected for appoint ment. In WP(C) No.4068/2007 and other connected cases disposed of by this Court on 23. 11.2007 in respect of the same selection process, this Court had taken the view that the candidates who were required to submit the Annexure-III certificate wer e not put to requisite notice. This Court, therefore, directed by the aforesaid order dated 23.11.2007 that the respondents will fix another date for submission of Annexure-III certificate by the petitioners in those writ petitions and on t he basis of such certificates as may be furnished the cases of the petitioners w ill be re-considered. The above directions by the Court were to apply only in re spect of those petitioners who had secured the minimum cut off marks that had be en worked out for each category of candidates i.e. general, ST, SC and OBC. As the petitioners in the present cases have secured the minimum cut off marks a nd were not selected for non-submission of the Annexure-III certificate the pres ent case will be covered by the order dated 23.1.2007 passed in WP(C) No.4068/20 07 and other connected cases. All the three writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with the same direction s as contained in the order dated 23.11.2007 passed in WP(C) No.4068/2007 and ot her connected cases