fr- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (S) No,i916_of.2007 Bhimeshwar Prasad Verma Age about 45 year, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Nand Lal Venna Badrinarayan iadgiya H.Sr. School Newra Block. Tilda, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Through Secretaty, Educational & Distt.- Raipur (C.G.O 2. 3. District- Raipur (C.G.) s'-; H.Sr. School -Newra, Block, -Tilda, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) sresent: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. tfll Passed on 30m ofMarch, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respoadents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in r (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been ^ (9 disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kiimw Vernw vs, The State Govt. of Chhattisgwh and finother) and olher connected matters, decided by this Court on 15- 12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus ofDiploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that tfae nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs, The State Govt. of Chhattisgwh and anoiher) (Supra). 3, ;ly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kinnar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether ttie petitioner has acquired f» D.Ed. Examination Certificate oa his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 md 01.03.1999 and furfher whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge