IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44883 of 2010 1.SURESH CHOUHAN, S/O LATE GARIBAN CHOUHAN. 2.SUMITRA DEVI, W/O SURESH CHOUHAN. 3.JAI PRAKASH CHOUHAN, S/O SURESH CHOUHAN. 4.MINA KUMARI @ JHINI KUMARI, D/O SURESH CHOUHAN. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-JAMAULI, P.S.- RAJPUR, DISTRICT-BUXAR. ………………PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. …………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02/ 26.03.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Considering that specific allegation of demand of dowry is against petitioner no. 1, Suresh Chouhan and petitioner no. 3, Jai Prakash Chouhan, namely the father-in-law and the husband, and that there is nothing specific against petitioner no. 2,Sumitra Devi and petitioner no. 4, Mina Kumari @ Jhini Kumari, who are mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the unfortunate lady, this Court while rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1, Suresh Chouhan and petitioner no. 3, Jai Prakash Chouhan, would direct for release of petitioner no. 2,Sumitra Devi and petitioner no. 4, Mina Kumari @ Jhini Kumari on bail if they surrender within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M,(Buxar) in connection with Rajpur P.S Case No. 88 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioners will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and their absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of their bail. (iii) The petitioners in case are now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of their bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)