Wm 200 . W©m3mlga mwm WWW mw(Wu) mm§fg€rm $aifa'na11éw mwm SB ‘ H6Wi’xié $hri Mamndra W10 han Shnvastava. 16—07-201 0 Shri Avinash Chand Sahui, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panei‘ -awyer for the State. Heard. With the conswt of iea petition is heard hhally. Learned couhset appea ng for the petitioner submits that for the present, the petitioner may be given an opportunity of filing the detailed representation before the com etent authority, to which iearhed counsei appearing for the State has no ection. Having considered and w hout expressing ahy opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this rt, ends ofjustice wiii be served if iiberty is granted to the petitioner to ke a detaiied representation raising her grievances before the compete t authority of the respondents aiong with a copy of the petition and this or er, within a period of one month from today and on such representation ng fried, the competent authority of the respondents may decide the sa 1e on its own merit, in accordance with iaw, as early as possibie preferably in a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. With the aforesaid obse ed counsei appearing for the pames, the i tion, the petition is disposed off. l Sd/- t" Manindra Mohan Shrivastava g Judge n o j u a i ' h