IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6100 of 2009 Between: N.Satish S/o.N.Bhushan,R/o.H.No.2-3-512/A/52, Chennareddy Nagar, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad, represented by his GPA Holder Sri N.Sravan S/o.N.Bhushan, aged about 28 years Occ: Business R/o.R/o.H.No.2-3-512/A/52, Chennareddy Hyd ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, having office at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R. District. 3 Smt.Jayasree W/o.Mohan Rao, R/o.H.No.3-4-20/1, Parsigutta, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the 2nd respondent with the instigation of the 3rd respondent in partly demolishing the building of the petitioner under Plot No.237 in Sy.No. 91 total admeasuring 300 sq. yards situated at Boduppal Village and Gram Panchayat, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without following due procedure contemplated under law as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the property under Plot No.237 in Sy.No.91 total admeasuring 300 sq. yards situated at Boduppal Village and Gram Panchayat, Ghatkesar Mandal, Rangareddy District without following due procedure contemplated under law. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner complains that the second respondent- Tahsildar, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, caused demolition of the house constructed over plot bearing No.237 in Sy.No.91 of Boduppal Village and Gram Panchayat, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. He contends that the second respondent got demolished the said house at the instance of the third respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. On specific instructions received by him, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, submits that respondents 1 and 2 have absolutely no role to play in the alleged demolition. He also referred to the suits that are pending between the petitioner on the one hand and the third respondent on the other. The receipts made on behalf of the petitioner are placed on record. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, taking on record, the representation made on behalf of the respondents, and leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies vis-à-vis the third respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date:23.03.2009 sj