IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46524 of 2009 RAVINDRA RAI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 13.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears from the record of Cr. Misc. No. 286 of 2006 that the petitioner was also a party there in serial no. 3 at page 2 of the cause title. By inadvertence his name was left out in the order granting bail on 15.2.2006 arising out of Patepur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judicial Magisgrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. The facts remains that the petitioner did not appropriately bring it to the attention of this Court for modification of the order and neither has he surrendered and subjected himself to the law since then, hindering the trial also. It is trite law that the Act of the Court shall prejudice none. But in the facts of the present case, there is contributory negligence of the petitioner also. This application is disposed off with the observation that any application for regular bail on his behalf is required to be considered on the day that he surrenders in light of the aforesaid discussion, without being prejudiced by the present order. Let a copy of this order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)