IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8105 of 2010 1. RAVI RANJAN KUMAR @ MUNNA son of Ram Nath Pandey 2. Gitanjali Sinha, wife of Sri Ravi Ranjan Kumar-----------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 6. 22.7.2010 Mistake has been committed in the order dated 1.7.2010 by typing supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, that shall be read as counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the complainant. Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Parties are remotely related with each other. There is allegation of advancing of amount to all the three accused persons including these petitioners but while after payment of petitioner’s money was not returned as assured pressure was made and it is said that accused no.1 executed a Bibayana (agreement to sell). Later at other occasion that was snatched. Taking of money by any of the accused persons is denied on the ground that a legal notice was sent to accused no.1 only asserting all payments to him. No document is annexed with the complaint petition. I also find no similarity in assertion made in complaint petition that with the legal notice and solemn affirmation. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in 2 connection with Complaint Case no.1609 ( C ) of 2009 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )