THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.17487 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondents 1 and 2 in considering the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.06.2008 bringing to their notice that the third respondent herein was unauthorisedly converting agricultural land into non-agricultural and attempting to make layout for house sites. The learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent-Gram Panchayat under instructions submitted that having considered the representation of the petitioner dated 12.06.2008 and having found that the allegations made by the petitioner are true, necessary action has already been initiated by the 2nd respondent against the third respondent. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, recording the statement of the learned standing counsel, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 18.08.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.17487 of 2008 Between: Pasala Ganga Rao S/o Chinna Penchalaiah Thummuru,Naidupeta Potti Sriramulu Nellore District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Panchayats) Nellore Potti Sriramulu Nellore District 2 Grama Panchayat Naidupeta Rep.by its Secretary Naidupeta Pottisriramulu Nellore District 3 Odduru Muddukrishna Reddy S/o.Ramana Reddy, Naidupeta Near R&B Gust House Pottisriramulu Nellore District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1&2 in allowing the 3rd respondent converting the agricultural lands covered by Sy No.s280/2 280/3,280/4,281/1 281/2 281/20 Thummuru (V) into not agricultural purpose and laying the laid into house plots without approval of layout as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 1&2 to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent as per the Rules and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. P. GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: