F.A.O.NO. 227 OF 1993 and 1 F.A.O.NO.1793 OF 1993 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH F.A.O.NO. 227 OF 1993 Date of decision:20th July, 2010 United India Insurance Company .......Appellant Versus Paramjit Kaur and others ........Respondents F.A.O.No. 1793 of 1993 United Insurance Company Ltd. ......Appellant Versus Jasmeet Kaur and others .......Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate, for the appellant. None for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Both the appeals arise out of the same accident and disposed of by the common order. 2. The appeal is by the Insurance Company seeking to claim exclusion of liability on the ground that the policy of insurance had been canceled on alleged advice from the Tariff F.A.O.NO. 227 OF 1993 and 2 F.A.O.NO.1793 OF 1993 Committee. The learned counsel states this is a subject matter of proceedings in civil court and it is reported to be pending before this Court in RSA No. 1138 of 1998. It is also stated that directions have been given by this Court that Insurance Company shall shoulder the liability and in the event of their success in the second appeal it shall become possible for the insurer to claim it from the State Roadways. 3. The award of the Tribunal is modified and the appeal is dismissed. However, the right to secure the amount shall depend on the result of the decision in R.S.A.No.1138 of 1998 titled as United India Insurance Company Vs. PRTC pending before this Court. [K.KANNAN] JUDGE 20th July, 2010 Shivani Kaushik