1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 810 OF 2007 (Mrs. Padma Khemraj Daware and another .v. The Mahila Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.D. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. 25TH APRIL, 2008. Heard. In the present petition, the petitioner challenges the recovery certificate under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act granted by the respondent No.2 in favour of the respondent No.1 as well as the revisional order by the respondent No.3 under Section 154(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of recovery certificate, the petitioners' tractor and trolley were confiscated by the respondent No.1/ Bank on 01.06.2004 and the same were sold out prior to one year of filing of the revision and sale proceeds were appropriated. It is the further contention of the petitioner that the tractor was sold for meager amount of Rs.90,000/- and, therefore, the certificate 2 under Section 101 is vitiated. However, in my considered opinion, the allegation that the respondent No.1 sold the petitioners' tractor and trolley for an amount of Rs.90,000/- only cannot be the ground to interfere in the recovery certificate which is confirmed by the respondent No.3/revisional authority, especially when the petitioners failed to show that the recovery certificate is illegal or contrary to law. The petition is devoid of merits and the same is dismissed in limine. JUDGE *rrg.