HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 5 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 5 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 5 OF 2008 IN IN IN FERA APPEAL (ST) FERA APPEAL (ST) FERA APPEAL (ST) NO. 39047 OF 2003 NO. 39047 OF 2003 NO. 39047 OF 2003 Shri. Suresh Kumar Kabra ... Petitioner Vs. Union of India ... Respondent Mr. L.S. Shetty for the Petitioner. Mr. R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel with Mr. A.S. Rao with Mrs. S.V. Bharucha i/by T.C.Kaushik for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:FEBRUARY 05, 2008 DATED:FEBRUARY 05, 2008 DATED:FEBRUARY 05, 2008 . It is contended by the Review Applicant that the delay in fact was not 10 days but 128 days. That material was not placed before us. It is contended that they have now discovered that material. The Review would lie on an error of law. The court was satisfied that the explanation offered for the delay was sufficient and consequently condoned the delay. . It is then contended that the appeal could not have been filed by the appellants. Such point was not raised at the time when the appeal was admitted. Even otherwise, if so entitled, it can be raised at the stage of final hearing. . With the above observations, Review Petition disposed of. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)