IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6757 of 2011 SATENDRA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.03.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakaribarama P.S. Case No. 39 of 2004 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that though the case was instituted in 2004 but final form was submitted on 07.08.2006 but differing with the same cognizance has been taken. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that accusation was found false during investigation and final form was submitted and other accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court. Since the petitioner is husband and the case was instituted in 2004, this Court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same 2 preferably on the same day considering the fact that the accusation has been found false during investigation if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, the application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)