IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CRMMO No.201 of 2010 Date of decision : November 9, 2010 Rajeev Nag …Petitioner. Versus Anil Sharma and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : M/s T.S. Chauhan & Surinder Saklani, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) For order, see order of the day placed on the file of CRMMO No.200 of 2010, titled as Rajeev Nag versus Anil Sharma and another. November 9, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?