Si 'i ife t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR .SS4°- WRIT PETITION VSOW OF 2006 •a.c E PETITIONER ^^ •^ Smt. Shanti Toppo, aged about 41 ,*- i..^j^>' ^ years, W/o Shri E. Toppo, LectureY \* ^» ^^'SP^'X „. .. -• fc^.-'C!^" ..••''" Hindi, Posted at Government z^y <^-^>y ^•'^ ....;-" '^y »<?'' RESPONDENTS •.'.cs-h^ % ^^Y'T^'^j '%-'»,M ' :./^^ '^'^'"—-s^ :r9f' ws-y ^' ^"J.^ -1 '""'sia8iRS8Sa*5ty ^*1^. <^ ./' ^... ^'^ ^~^/ .^ -••^, ^'^ o- y -.0 --S'1 OVY ^ r\^ Higher Secondary School, Tiwarta, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Schedule Caste and Schedule Trihe" Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, ' Korba District Korba (C.G.) If «L 4. The Assistant Commissioner, TribS^- Development Department, District Korba (C.G.) 5. The Principal, Government Higher Secondaiy School, Tiwarta, District Korba (C.G.) 4. Shri Lila Ram Markam, x Lecturer Hindi, Govemment Tribal Boys Ashram' Kulharighat, Block -'. 'f'... — . Mainpur, District Raipur C.G. WRIT PETrTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCEJ5F AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. L ^) (^ XI-HC-78 HWWI St»+<|th 3'S? '<<W\V\^, WT&WKo, (°lt1Wy< M.^..'3s4?.l ^200 311^1 Ha«h(<iprf3^?T) 3n^5T9irR-fi+ (iOTail^Tstiiiqi ic 8«llly<;B^tI'd<l^l 19.7.2006 W-P. Nos. 3523/2006/ 3 3527/2006. 3528/2006, 352 3533/2006, 3534/2006, 3542/2006. 3543/2006, 354 3347/2006. 8^24/2006, 3525/2006, 3526/2006, !^/2005, 3530/2006, :3531/2006, 353^/2006, 3540/2006, 3541/2006, 354+/2006, 3545/2006,. 3546/2006, Advocafre for '••,' ^ Shri !%sjesh Pcmdey, ;w ', Shri' SurResh ^Bttjaj, respanyenti^Stccte <m ialvEmca co^y ths petitioners. ipovernment Advocate for the The. main gneviaTC®^(•diSe(f| com"non issue. 's m"o:!ve£f'in•rfresel disposed of fay this common oraep.l By these petitions, the peti i" various l-ligher Secondary Scho Chhaf'isgarh, have ouestioned tj •trwsfer order dated 7.7.2006 slgnatu.re of Under • Secretari SsNe&ied.Caste & Scheduied ^l'lie' ^rounds of\ chaileng^ petttioBers,/we''t+iC!t ltfoe^;Seci Jurisdiction 'fo,''pass'';Hi8':i?npugns^ Trible <*l'i|td41-f t1WclTt"teIA<I»l«l< ^siRliTsn^r by •Hte petitionar's is common and pstltions, 1+ierefore, "rtiey are being -ioners. who ore workinc) as l-ecturer Is of fne bjstr-ict Korba of State of |ie fegality' <& correctness of their {Ainexure P-1) issued under the ^, ^overnment of Chhcttisgarh, ^e Deveiopment Oepartment, Raipur. of -t+iis orde", as rajsed bv 1tie or the Undec Secretary has nd •h-ansfer order, as tha Counssi!in< P.T.O. 1 XI-HC-78 3S? ^TraTrFI', BTll'K'is, (qciray *ii«-i<ni a>Ni<h CT^ 200 an^i'qgw (i^3g^?T) 3!n^rwl<4i* cplTSn^Tsbtiiti B^nwriitT3n^?T •A. Comm'ttee is empowered to Rationallzation Scheme dcted transter order issued by respon^is nuilit^' in the eyes oT ia'A'. delegated the powers of trans^ committee constituted at the 31 scheme dated 1.6.2006 eind -fhel issued in flagrant violation of th.4 of Tnis rationciization scheme. Perusa! of impugned petitioners have been transferretj dated 1.6.2006 shows that the reasons that the impugned isrd^ been transferred hcs i been pcs; order hgs not been passed und< 1-6.2006 and the same has been of generai powers to transfer its Per'usal of rntionalizoition where on accoynt of ·tronsfe.rs, of teachers ho.ve become irratiorl< num&ers OT srudenTs i^e. wftere on| in one schoo! numbers pf teachsds *i<iFcf4)-< •<it)dTffte^t<(Si«;i< ^iSI^ITSn^T ssue transfer orders under 1+ie ..6.2006, •riierefore, the impugned lent No.l is without jurisdiction ww •i& Sta+e (Sovernment has aiready erring •t+ie teachers to counseliing tate tevei under The rationaiization impugned tr-ansfer order has been provisions contained in Paros 5 A 6 or^jer Annexure P-1 whereby the as aiso the rationaiizdtion scheme toetitjons are m'sconceived, tor the 'Jf under which the petitioners ho.ve isd on administrctive grounds. Tltis sr the rationalization schenne dated p|issed by the Sovernment jn exercise iployees. fecheme dated 1.6.2006 shows that pr^motions & retirements the numbers lai jn various schoots iooking to the I account of above mentioned reasons have become less 1 or 2 or wher® P.T.O. r •SWfcSUu^.^.s,: XI-HC-78 3-Bct rt||<| |C?1<<, ®Ti1«'l6,fac1iyy< Cc9. i*11<4MI Sb*llth ^200 3<l^l >ia»(lctt3°"^r) sn^ff^n'R.fi* cWT 311^1 sbl.lich ^tiTWtrfN'sn^T -7 c^se t" ie numbers of teachers have humbers of taacheps, in that snvisaged in the scheme, wil! con^- ifter coliecting informstion frol schools or middie schools or committee shs!l rationalize the nut looking to ths numbers pf studen^s committee is to ensure that in no teachers, m case of middle schoc| case of high school not tess than secondary schooi not less thai six As has faeen meritioned eQt! bsen pcissed under the administr'a^ administrative qrounds and this 4 rationoiization scheme dated 1.6. imoowered to trcmstsr its emiii '•ationsiization scheme does not yepartfflsnt of the State Sovernii its teachers in the administr'ative ^Aoreove", a bare pe-usai of the p| |mentioned in ths petitions that liigher secondary school numbers 'shl'i|f<-]41'l WTcff ^ te^:<Rf+dl< ^i SI^IT 3tl^?T ^xceeded more thui the reauired the concemed departn-ient, as jti+ute a counselilng committee and !|ri the various higher secondary primar/ schools. the ; concerned tnbers of tsachers in each schoois ts. It has bsen env'saoed that the ^r-imary school remdn less than two |1 not isss thcn three teachers, in :our teachers itnd in case of hiqher reacnsrs. • ^lier that the impugned order has Itive fsowers of the iSoyernment on •a'er has nothina to do with the |2006. The 6overnment.is ciways ioyses cnd the introduct'ion of ••ecte any besr that the: concerned jsent is not emoowered to transfer [exigency or in the public interest. fctitions shows thot it has not been ^y t-hese transfers in d particuia" lof teachers has become less thon P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^rwrldHi* tW SII^T Stlliqi Rosh<m/- ta 3^"i|l<ll<f!<, ©Tfltl'IG,&WI'M3< WNCfTShHlch w^20(r 3ii^i 4a«('ytlg0"^) SCTraTBfStTSn^T -V 1+ie requirea numbers of ,ded iooking to Ifse' of the petitioners are not maii (1) tiie order impugned of the ffovernment ' qround and it has n\ rationalization scheml (2) in the petitions it hq transfers fhe princip has been vialated i.e.l of teachers have tecchers under the any particular schooj (3) The areas: of 1.6.2006 cnd of oper<|t!on Governmen'* are diffd {-lowe'.'er, if oiny suci] petitionsrs, then tney wili be cuthority concerned. In vjew of fne above, tt| Consequently, M.('/s/.)P. <t)i<il<-i<fl-i WRff ff teicB' <Rt+];i< ^i sri^r an^r Iteachers or numbers 6f teachers have numbes's of students. Therefore. 1+ie petitions tstainabie for ttie reasons that; ^ias been passed under the oeneral powers \o trcnsfer its empioyees on administrative frt been cassea' under the &sid sche.me i.e. ^ dated 1.6.2006. : not been alteged 'ttiat on account of these |ie enunciated in the rctibnalization scheme |on account of these traisfers the numbers b^come less •rtiar, the required numbers of l-'ationalization scheme or have exceeded in |:ontrdry to the rationaiizctjon scheme. of the rationaiization scheme dated ^enera! powers of transfer of Stcte trenr. instance comes to the notice of the |at iiberty to make a representatio" to the ie petitions stand dismissed. for grant of stay a!so stands dismissed. SdJ- L.C. Bt^aso JudS's F.1.0.