IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14823 of 2008 VIKASH KHATIK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.5.2008 Heard. Petitioner is an accused in a case under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown. The submission is that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor any recover has been made from his possession. He has also not been put on T.I. parade. Further submission is that during course of investigation two witnesses vide paragraphs 16 and 17 of the case diary stated before the police to have learnt the name of the petitioner from one Baijnath Singh. Learned counsel submitted that the said Baijnath Singh was never examined in the case during investigation. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 6.2.2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely Vikash Khatik is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten - 2 - thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Sasaram (T) PS case no.7 of 2008. (M.Saran,J) AI