IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 213 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 104 OF 2010 SHRI. SURYA RAMCHANDRA NAIK AND ORS. ... Applicant Versus SMT. SUXILA TUKARAM NAIQUE AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri Nitin Sardesai, Advocate for the applicants. Shri R. G. Ramani, Advocate for respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 18th February, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. N. Sardessai, learned Counsel for the applicants. He states that he is not pressing the application having regard to the nature of the decree passed by the appellate Court. Hence application is disposed of as not pressed. 2. In para 2 of the application the applicants have stated that right from the time the suit was filed till the passing of the impugned judgment no injunction was operating against the applicants. 3. Reply filed on behalf of respondents which is accompanied by the copies of the order passed by the Trial Court as well as by the Appellate Court discloses that at some point of time the injunction was operating against the applicants herein. This being the position, it is evident that the applicants have made incorrect statement in the application seeking interim relief. I therefore, deem it proper to imposed costs on the applicants. Applicants shall pay cost of Rs.2,000/- ( Rupees two thousand only) which shall be paid by the applicants in favour of Goa State Legal Services Authority within a period of four weeks. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn