IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21473 of 1998 Between: 1.. N.S.V.Venugopal S/o Subramanyam D.No. 12/19B, T.K.Street, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist 2.. S.S.Thirumalamma W/o Late S.S.Srinivasulu Naidu D.No. 12/19A, T.K. Street, Tirumala, Chittor Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Govt. of A.P. rep. by Secretary, Revenue (Endowments-III) Dept., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 2 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi rep. by Executive Officer Tirupathi, Chittor Dist 3 The Special Dy Collector Land Acquistion, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.Ms.No. 510 Revenue (Endowments-III) Department , dated 28-06-96, issued by the first respondent, as illegal unjust, arbitrary , without jurisdiction and contrary to law and also declare that the action of the respondents in not providing alternative accommodation to the petitioners as arbitrary illegal discriminatory and unjust and further declare that the petitioners are entitled for alternative accommodation at Tirumala as per the resolutions passed by the Board of Trustees of TTD Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU The Court made the following : ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning G.O.Ms.No.510 Revenue (Endowments-III) Department dated 28-6-1996 and for a direction to provide alternative accommodation to the petitioners. Learned counsel for petitioner Mr.P.Gangarami Reddy submitted that in an identical writ petition, this Court directed the Government to consider the case of the petitioner therein for providing alternative accommodation and the Tirumala Tirupati Devestanam Board on consideration of the matter, rejected the request of the petitioner therein and in view of such rejection, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 24-2-2005 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Secretary, Govt. of A.P., Revenue (Endowments-III) Dept., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 2 The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Tirupathi, Chittor Dist 3 The Special Dy Collector Land Acquistion, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist 4) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMD}