THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2924 of 2009 Dated : 12.10.2009 Between : Smt.Irrinki Rajani ….. Petitioner a n d Irrinki Vara Prasad & another ….. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2924 of 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge (FTC), Kothagudem, Khammam District, in I.A.No.247 of 2005 in O.S.No.122 of 2004 dated 11.02.2009. On 13.08.2009 it was reported by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that vide order dated 02.08.2007 the impugned petition was dismissed and again by order dated 11.02.2009 the very same petition was allowed and this Court observed that it is not clear as to how that has happened and a report was called for from the Presiding Officer. Further it was also observed by this Court in the order dated 13.08.2009 that in case of any suppression of facts by the petitioner, he shall be liable for exemplary costs. The report from the Presiding Officer reveals that the order dated 02.08.2007 being an ex parte order, was set aside on an application filed under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereafter the order dated 11.02.2009 was passed on merits. When an application for setting aside the order dated 02.08.2007 was filed, obviously, the revision petitioner must have received the notice of the same. Thus, there is suppression of facts on the part of the revision petitioner. Even otherwise, it was the duty of the revision petitioner to verify from the records of the trial Court as to how two orders were passed. In that event, he could have come to know the real facts. Thus, the civil revision petition is filed somewhat mischievously and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 12th October, 2009 sur