IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4546 of 2006 RAMDEO RAI, Son of Late Rit Lal Rai, resident of Village- Rahampur Rudauli, Post Office-Rudauli, Police Station- Samastipur Sadar, District- Samastipur --------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road,Patna 2. The General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Mithila Electric Supply Area, Darbhanga 3. The El;ectrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Samastipur 4. The Electrical S.D.O. Electric Supply Sub Division, Pusa, Samastipur 5. The Accounts Officer, Electric Supply Circle, Samastipur, District-Samastipur ---------------- Respondents. ----------- 2 10-02-2011 Heard Sri Satya Narayan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired on 30.9.2005 as Skilled Worker from the office of Electric Supply Sub Division, Pusa , Samastipur, has prayed for direction to the Respondents to make payment of all the retiral dues of the petitioner. In this case a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondents Bihar State Electricity Board and in paragraph 5 , it has been stated that payments under the following head have already been made: (i) G.S.S. amount Rs.51,876/- has been paid vide Cheque No.071609 dated 16.1.2006 (ii) G.P.F. Final withdrawal amount Rs.3,92,282/- has been paid vide Cheque No.073216 dated 15.4.2006. (iii) Leave encashment amount Rs.71, 250/- has been paid vide Cheque No.073233 dated 29.4.2006. (iv) Arrear of pension amount Rs.12, 004/- has been paid vide Cheque No.403616 dated 26.4.2006. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that counter affidavit is silent on the point of final payment of 100% Gratuity as well as in respect of arrears of over-time for the period 1996 to 2004. Since most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, there is no need to keep the present writ petition further pending. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that if some of the grievances still exist, he will be at liberty to file proper representation before Respondent no.4. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, it is expected that Respondent no.4 will take all steps for redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. The petition stands disposed of with above observation and direction. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)