[ 1 ] IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 224 OF 2007 IN SUMMARY SUITNO. 2555 OF 2005 Shivam Steels & Tubes Pvt.Ltd. ... Plaintiffs Vs. Nav Bharat Industries & Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. C.M.G. Shastry Advocate for the Plaintiffs. Mr. V.T.Lulia Advocate for the defendant Nos. 1 and 3 to 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.A.Sayed, J. : A.A.Sayed, J. : A.A.Sayed, J. DATE DATE DATE : May 5, 2009. : May 5, 2009. : May 5, 2009. P.C. 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the Plaintiffs for inspection of the documents mentioned in the prayer clause (a)(i) to (a)(iv). 2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The documents mentioned in the prayer clause [ 2 ] (a)(i) to (a)(iv) are not referred to or relied upon by the defendants. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs has not been able to point out any provision of law whereby he is entitled to seek inspection of the said documents which are not referred to or relied upon by the defendants. Be that as it may, at the stage of trial, if at all the documents are vital the Court is always at liberty to draw adverse inference if the said documents are being withheld by the defendants. In my opinion the Chamber Summons is only a fishing and roving inquiry and is devoid of substance. 4. For the aforesaid reasons, I find no merit in the Chamber Summons. Chamber summons is dismissed. No order as to costs. [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]