^'";? COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR PRTITIONER WMT PETITION ( S ) No. 372 of20( Karam Siagh Chauhan, aged - 44 years, S/o Shri P.R.Chaulian, R/'o Nawapai'a, Wa'd No. 7, Gharshora, District Raiearh fC.G.) •VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, tfarough - Sscretary, Education Departinent, D.K.S. Bilavaii, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Deputy Director, Education Departmenf, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Biock Educatiaii Officer, Tairmar, Disti-ict Raigarfa (C.G.) 4. Joiiit Dircctor, Treasury, Accouits & Peiisioii, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRTT PETmON L7NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AanBiotri, J. Present: Shri Santosh K. Tiwari, Advocate forthe petitioner. Sliri U.N.S.Deo, Govenmient Advocate forthe State/ IS (Passed on 22"" day of January,2Q08) 1. This is a v,Tit petitioa for change offhe respondeats and amendment in the cause title in W.P.(S) No. 6894/2007 (Karam Sineh Chauhan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), disposed ofearlier. 2. A substantial writ petition is not maintainable. The petitioner oaght to faave made an application in W.P.CS) No. 6894/2007 itselffor change/correction in the cause title. The petitioner has chosen to f5!e this petition seeking again a direction to grant regular pay scale .which has already been granted in W.P.tS) No. 6894/2007 vide order dated 20.11.2007. 3. Thus, this petition is dismissed as not mMntainable. However, the order dated 20.11.2007 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6894/2007 (Karam Sindi Chauhan Vs. State of Chhattis.aarh & Others) is binding on aU the concemed ofBcera, whether they were party to the petition or nor. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge n3