^\* ^/Yo ..-•^? -y ^^>c^ -St^ ^y /y' ^^ ^'?y C^ ^3^]^- IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR [CG1 WRIT PETITION fSI N0. '2^^3>° /2010 ^' WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Dilip Kumar Gaikwad, aged about 45 years, son of Late Motilal Gaikwad, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently working as Upper Division Teacher, at Govt Middle School - Ramgarh, Block - Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS .^ ' . 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh .Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ' Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal, Rajnandgaon (CG) 3. ^Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG) 4. Block Education Officer.—Mohala. Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) i l 311^1 W l<-li* wiran^nwiw ^sr n4i'4io<<, ff-alyie, MMi^y -ti^:;?:.CX::)h^:.^22.t>2'.9. 3TI^?f 'T^? ('^f35Rtl) IWIW ^ltel 311^1 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohari '+l^id^-'f ^N^ ^ ^S^ <Pq-^l< ^?3JfWT31I^! Shrivastava. J. 23-07^010 Shri A. N. Bhakta, oounsel for flhe petittoner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Ijawyer for the State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing f petitioner is entitled to benefit of two| he having passed B. Ed. examinatioi) cost. It is submitted that the issue irjvolved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has pr the petitioner submits that the advan increments on acoount of before his appointment at his own been finally decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha\Saxena vs. Stete of M.P. & Ors., 2009 ffll) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furthej-submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his orc|er dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned co|unsel for the petitioner lurtherdraws attention of this Court to order dated No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) a 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal the jucfament of the Supreme Court id the order passed ,by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, |directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant ^f two advance increments as per oircular dated 21-09-1974 issued by ^he State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the Learned oounsel for the resrtondents submits that case of the petituner woutd also be considered oi|) the same lines. petition. Vm'(\V V^tynsr,,!f!WI'K— FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. ^^^ ^-.?!??T?^.,,,, fr"^-; C—78 3TI^[ qil R-li* ^T 3?T^T ^ifli°K Tumane S^T •^ll'41<rt'4, ®il1'M<l<o,fsK'liyy ^wA.B?^^0)'0., 3}<4ieb / <11^ sn^T'tRqr (i°it3«!<t4) 'TOIIW ^ifCT an^t -2-' In view of the statement disposed of with a direotion to the re^i da;ide the claim of the petitioner for | per circular dated 21-09-1974 issueitl after verification ofthe facts pleaded weeks from today. iDade qiNOTh inwif-S Is^ •?te?R i&aifinaii^i above, this petition is finally ipondent authorities to consider and farant of two advance inorements as by the State of Madhya Pradesh, |i the petition within a period of eight ^^aMohaBShriva^va Judge <^