IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.880 of 2009 BABLU KUMAR S/O JAGAT NARAYAN YADAV, R/M- PRITHIVIPUR, CHIRAINYATAR, P.S.- JAKKANPUR, DISTT- PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA. 3. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA. 4. THE CITY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA. 5. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF GANDHI MAIDAN POLICE STATION, PATNA. ----------- 2 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed. The grievance of the petitioner is that on account of institution of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 108 of 2009 against the accused persons for the offences under Sections 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accused persons of the said case continuously giving the threats with dire consequences to the petitioner including the kidnapping. However, the police, even after receiving such offence which discloses commission of cognizable offence the case is not being registered and the petitioner is getting continuous threats to withdraw the aforesaid police case. However, learned counsel submits that on account of the aforesaid inaction/refusal by the police to register the case, petitioner has not filed any complaint in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that considering the submissions of the parties it appears that in case the information of the petitioner given to the police in a cognizable offence and police refuses to register the case it will be open for the petitioner either to approach the concerned Superintendent of Police, Patna or to file a regular complaint before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate and as such in the present writ application, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)