:> ^ ^/' (1^>^)-^<? IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmS6ARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} W.P: (S) N0. /2010 PETITEONER RESPONDENTS 1P^/ ::^y <lv^^./ /^"'te'y ^•^ ..''' r A' >^s^ ,¥?•• / •ir"' Punaram Thakur, Aged about 52 years, S/o Shri Chhatter Singh Thakur, Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School, Jadutola, District- Rajnandgaon (C.6.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Trible Welfare bepartment .D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner Trible Wetfare Depar'tment Raipur (C.6.) 3. Assistant Commissioner Trible Welfare Department Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District-Rajnandgaon (C.6.) 5. Block Education Officer Chhuria, District- Rajnandgaon (C.6.) 6. The Principle fiovernment Higher Secondary School Jadutola, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.6.) ^ ^ WRIT PETETION UN&ER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUION OF INDIA ••'"} »t HiQH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BELASPuR Single Bench: Hon bieShri Manjndra MohanShrivastava,.j, r'c '?•?'»-f^a?£-?^ i i i iuNtK RESPGNDENTS t.s.sr^.t'v B-tt?—" s-T°Brf'^ia8••^•a*. &K-I n>~F.n?^ ?.?si^. ^/4 WKi l r'c, i f i lyn (S j MuSf£,sUu~iU r'unararn i naKui versus State of Chhattisgarri and others 'WRiT PETiTiON UNDER ASTiCLE52eS27 &F THE CQNSTiTuTIQN uF iNOiA Present: - Shri K.S. Pawar, counsei for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jaln. Panel Lawver for the Stete. UKAL UKUisl (Passed on 17 June,2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruc'tions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest thls petition on rnerits at this stage, and prays for v/lthdrawai of this petition with iibeny to rnake a representation in the iight ofthe circuiai' dated 27/12/2008 (Annexure P/2). 2. Ms. Jain, iearned Panei Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents subrnits that if a representation is made, the same shaii be considered and decided within a period of thres weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in the iight of the above stated circuiar, as weii as the order dated 20/01/2009 p-assed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.6128/2007 (Jagannath Ram v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters. 3. in view of the foregoing, the peution Is ulsmissed as withdrawn with the above-stated libeiTy. tt is expected that the concerned authorities would consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within as period of three 'weeks frorn the date ui recelpt of the representation aiongvi/lth a copy uf this order. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge