WV v F , wF-CS) wo‘ qg5Y/O9’ mm ammo- mm (mg) mmm mmm mmm ‘ ' mmW fgvz”:m $31‘fawm Pl‘alil GEEK AvmaSh Dam Sic Am Barn, aged about ‘38 vsarq u, Rio Shallti Nagar Ward, Jagdalpur. Uisu, uaSiar {LU} Versus KEbE’UiVDEi‘ETS 1. Stats of Chhatti§garh throuvh Sarsfanr, Tnbal Welfare Depwmmnt, “.K S Bbawod Kanpur msu. kapu: (LU) 2. SecrstQrV, Pmw‘navnf and Grnmm Vikas vmnag, DRS. Bhawan, Ralpur, Dlsit. Raipur (3G) 3. Commk>1ouer Tnhdl WL‘Hdi‘c, Chhaumgarh, Kaipur, J1stt Kaipumbb) d 1‘ 1119 pann‘hnvai’ daaqaipur UlSu bastar (bGJ 5, (‘nmHnQ ~1n1-IP1" Tnbn1 ‘N'PH‘hrP ‘ Bagfgr p1v1s10’1 uagaaipur ulsn bastaru u) f (“nmnnq ‘1nnPr. Thha] WE‘H‘Qm; VICLE} 226 Ui" THE CUN$TITUTIGH sun Mane] Paranipa Ad ocate, for th€ paiiiongr. bfil‘l 1V1 1" b4 Biléktla U‘y‘ (Vt Adv, 301‘ ii1€ Stai6. This pEtition is dirécts agajnSi i116 orci'ar’ da‘wd 27-7-2067 L, (Annaiure P4} Wilemby mm p mnoner, W110 was pGstea' as Simsna Karim Ljraae-i, at Uoveinm m Linis Higher b‘econaary §Ci1001, M.L.t5., Jagaamur, has bea nmwiened to Uovenmmnt H1g11€r 56C011££a1fy t5c11001, Kotma, bas ar.‘ v9.9.5) wo‘qgar/o} m ‘aiizoo Mmm wma %§m$ mm<W) mmm wmh ?mm %€H%mm %?a‘f<mm Shri: Bhafia, iéalngé Ey. Govt. Advecate, appsan'ng 101‘ me State, Submits that tha U‘ansfer cmia" 0f Annexum P—4 so 1311‘ ag: it rsiateS to the petitimmr, cou not be given effect to (i116 t0 mimim Olt‘ier (iated 21—8—20C3'? paSSEi by 11115 Court. E11 ‘Lhese cucumstancrw, 111:3 ii‘ansfm‘ miter $0 far aS reiates to th€ penuonsr, gas becoma Rac‘ium‘iallt and meaniugkss Vith thé lapS€ 01 hmé and they“ 11am: 11o ohiection if {116 petiiion is wat‘i with iiberty‘ i0 tha State: to paSS apprcpriate ordErs in tins ma'wr of trajlsfer] posting 0: the p in i116 $76111 of adminiStratiw Xigancy. in VIEW of T116 abo‘m ubini$sion of learnéd COunse‘i for um State, the iiistani petition is wed and impugneci order 01 finuexure P4 So far a3 it reiaies to th petiiioner, is Set aside. However, the State shaii be at iibertv to jaes appropriate or’cier iil me event oi administrative exigencv in e matter“ of tranéfferipoating of the petitioner. tier, LA. No. 1 for‘ i11terim reiiet also it Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge in View of the above SiSIiCiS filSpOS€Cl Oi: " a e o o “