IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2010 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32882 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KESAVAN,S/O.RAGHAVAN,RESIDING AT MADISSERRY KANJIRATHINGAL HOUSE,P.O.KATTAKAMPAL, KATTAKAMPAL VILLAGE,THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,COLLECTORATE THRISSUR-680501. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR-680501. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR,SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, AKKIKKAVU-680 519. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.32882 OF 2010(I) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's main grievance is regarding the non registration of Ext.P4 document represented before the 3rd respondent. It would appear that the issue is one in relation to the fair value notification. It is seen that aggrieved by the fair value fixed, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 appeal before the first respondent and therefore what is primarily needed is a decision on the appeal. 2. In that view of the matter I direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 appeal filed by the petitioner. This the first respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment . Once the appeal is disposed of as above, petitioner shall present the document along with the appellate order before the 3rd respondent, who shall deal with the document in accordance with law. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. 32882/2010 :2 :