IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11759 of 2010 1. RINKI KUMARI D/O ARJUN PRASAD 2. PINKI KUMARI D/O ARJUN PRASAD 3. ARJUN PRASAD SON OF LATE SATASHI DAS 4. URMILA DEVI WIFE OF ARJUN PRASAD, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALYANPUR TOLA, POLICE STATION ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT NALANDA …. PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BIJAY PRASAD SON OF RAM CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GOBARBIGHA, POLICE STATION HILSA, DISTRICT NALANDA …. OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2. 8.12.2010 The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 13.1.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Hilsa, Nalanda, by which he has taken cognizance u/ss.304B and 201/34 I.P.C. Considering that Section 304B raises a presumption against the in-laws, which can only be looked into at the stage of trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )