IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15556 of 2010 SHEO BACHAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 328, 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is not the named accused, however, he has been implicated in this case on basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused. It is further submitted that out of the two persons whose names have come out on the confessional statement, one of the co-accused namely, Sonelal Sah has been allowed bail by this Court as per the order dated 23.02.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4708 of 2010. Learned counsel for the State is not in position to refute the above submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah (West Champaran) in connection with Sugauli G.R.P.S. Case No. 50 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the Court concerned giving full genealogy showing his relationship with the petitioner. After his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned will be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)