1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 101 of 2009 With Criminal Writ Petition No. 125 of 2009 [Sachin Suresh Taklikar Vs. State of Mah. & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Anup Parihar, APP for respondents. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : 25TH February, 2009. 1. These two petitions are received through Jail. 2. The grievance represented in both the petitions is one and the same. 3. It appears from record that during the petitioner's release on parole, he was prosecuted on two occasions for offence punishable under Sections 294 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, and, thus, the fact remains that he has enemies with whom he either fights, or in any eventuality, his being at large is going to be risky for him. 4. In this situation, we see no ground for indulgence. Both the petitions are, therefore, rejected. 2 5. This decision be communicated to the petitioner through the Superintendent of Central Prison, Nagpur. 6. Copy of this order be supplied to learned APP free of cost, to act upon. Judge Judge |Hedau|