THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.764 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is an association of residents of Lingojiguda Village, Saroornagar Mandal. They filed W.P.No.8341 of 2009, feeling aggrieved by the proceedings dated 21.11.2008, through which steps were initiated for alienation of 10 acres of land in survey No.2 of Dawoodkhanguda Village. It was pleaded that the said land was allotted to various individuals of village, but the allotments are cancelled. The writ petition was admitted on 24.04.2009 and an interim order was passed in W.P.M.P.No.10908 of 2009, suspending the proceedings dated 21.11.2008. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have violated the interim orders of this Court. On behalf of the respondents, a counter-affidavit and additional counter-affidavit are filed. It is stated that the pattas that were granted over an extent of Acs.10.00 in favour of various individuals were cancelled vide proceedings dated 28.03.2007 in terms of G.O.Ms.No.493 dated 28.04.2006 and that the land was earmarked for construction of a Government Polytechnic College. It is also stated that on repeated representations being made by the petitioner and other eligible persons, plots carved out of Acs.5.00 of land were allotted to the eligible persons, including such members of the petitioner- association, who are residents of Dawoodkhanguda village, and in the remaining extent of Acs.5.00 of land, a building was said to have been constructed for setting up of a Government Polytechnic College for Women. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The grievance of the petitioner is about the proposals for allotment of Acs.10.00 of land, in favour of other agencies. The record, no doubt, discloses that the plots carved out of the same land was assigned in favour of various individuals. Hardly before any substantive step was taken, the assignments were cancelled and the entire extent of Acs.10.00 of land was allotted to the Government Polytechnic College for Women. On the basis of the representation made by the petitioner and others, Acs.5.00 of it was allotted as house- sites. The dispute is only about the remaining extent of Acs.5.00. As of now, a polytechnic college is existing. It is not a case where the college was established subsequent to the orders of this Court. The petitioner can certainly pursue its remedies in the writ petition, when it comes for final hearing. This Court does not find any deliberate acts on the part of the respondents, which would constitute the contempt of Court. The Contempt Case is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:16.11.2011 GJ