IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40230 of 2009 MUNNA KUMAR SAH @ MUNNA SAH, S/o Jokhu Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail since on the earlier occasion on 29.10.2009 this Court had rejected the bail on the ground that the petitioner was implicated in other cases even though it has been stated in the petition that the petitioner has four antecedents. However, the petitioner submits that in fact the antecedent mentioned in the case diary was that of Munna Sah son of Ramanand Sah and not against the petitioner. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submission, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial - 2 - Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sugauli (Motihari) Rail P.S. Case No. 26 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)