IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-35669 of 2009 Date of Decision : December 21, 2009 Ram Niwas .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. A. S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Ram Niwas has filed this second petition for bail in case FIR No.16 dated 09.02.2009, under Sections 148, 149, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Nathusari Chopta, District Sirsa. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. After dismissal of previous bail petition on merits, no fresh ground has accrued for release of the petitioner on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that PW Rohtash, vide statement Annexure P-2 made in the Court, has contradicted the prosecution version. However, the alleged contradiction cannot be evaluated by this Court at bail stage and has to be evaluated by the trial court in context of entire material on record and not on the basis of solitary statement annexed herewith. Dismissed. December 21, 2009 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE