1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1113/2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.810/2009 Nandkumar Ghadge Applicant/Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra Respondent Party in person /Applicant Mr.S.A.Shaikh,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . This application is preferred for necessary relief and for suspension of conviction.The applicant has submitted that he was suspended from the service and if at all conviction is suspended then he will get the benefits of suspended employee. 2] The learned A.P.P. relies on the ruling of Hon’ble Supreme Court State of Maharashtra Vs.Gajanan and Ors.(,2003) 12 ,ACC 432 and has submitted that no exceptional circumstance has made out by this accused. 3] The accused is convicted for the offence punishable under section 489 A,B,C,D of the Indian Penal Code for using and circulating counterfeit fake 2 G.C.notes. While preparing fake currency it is held by the Sessions Court that he has used the office premises and machinery of B.A.R.C.. Considering the ramification conviction cannot be suspended .Hence I am not inclined to allow this application. 4] The application for suspension of conviction is rejected. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)