1 chs942-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.942 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.656 OF 2010 Citicorp Finance (India) Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Maya Construction & Anr. ....Respondents Ms.Shakuntala Joshi i/b S.I. Joshi & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.Udaya Shankar Samudrala for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents states that an appeal has been filed and the matter has been kept for admission on 5.10.2010. Nothing prevents the Respondents from making an application for ad-interim reliefs in the appeal. The Court Receiver was appointed by an order dated 8.2.2010. According to the Respondents, they came to know about the order only on 14.7.2010. Even assuming that to be correct, there is no excuse for having refused to comply with the order during this period. 2. I will over look the breach of the order at this stage on the presumption that the Respondents were genuinely under the impression, that they need not comply with the orders as they intended to file an 2 chs942-10 appeal. The appeal was filed only on 5.8.2010. 3. The Chamber Summons is therefore disposed of by the following order :- i). Subject to a stay being granted to the order dated 8.2.2010 by the Appeal Court, the Respondents shall hand over possession of the vehicle to the Court Receiver on or before 20.9.2010, failing which the Court Receiver shall take forcible possession of the vehicle with the assistance of the police, if necessary. However, the Respondents shall disclose the location of the vehicle to the Court Receiver and to the Petitioner’s advocate on or before 5.00 p.m. on 3.9.2010. 4. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of.