WUl O) £MI IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S)NO.fc\^0 /2011 PETITIONER ^^•l35-^. ^'^:> ^^'^ ^t^7 Vishwanath Singh S/o Khiran Singh, aged about 48 years, Occupation service, Posted as Head ^ 1') RESPONDENTS II_ Master Primary S'chool Kudar, Block Lundra, District Surguja C.G. VERSUS ]<<State of C.G. through the Secretary Tribal Welfare 'Department, DKS ^hawan Raipur, C.G. 2. The Collector Surguja, District Surguja Ambikapur C.G. 3. The District Education officer, Ambikapur, district Surguja c.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. MAY THIS PLEASE TOjmiIR-LOSnSHU Aaus. HIGH COURT OF CHHAITIS('TARH AT BITASI^TJR WRJT PETITION (S) No, 6140 of2.011 inath Sineh VF.RSUS IESPONDENTS : StateofC.G. &, Others. %;EITPETmON UNDER ART1CLE 22S OF "l'HE CQNS'm'Lq'IONOF: SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Affmhotri. J. Present: Shri Rak-esh Pandev. Advocate tbrthe netitioner. Sini Ai"ua Sao- GovetTitneat Advocate for tlie State/resoouueiits ORDKR ('ORAT^ it^&SSSu. 011 i / u,ay oi \jcxoDer., ^v i i) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petifioner submits that the petitioner, working as Head Mast.er. Prnnarv Sc.hool Kudar. Bloek Luadra, District. Sumiia. has heen transferred to Primarv School. Ghafbarra. Udaimir. vide order dated 15,07.2011 CAsnexiire P/l) on administrative groiinds. Shri Psadev fiirther submits tliat the wife of th®petitioner is also a govemment servaiit and posted a.-s Shiksfaa Karmi Grade I!I a.t Primary Schoo! Changori, Block Limdra. Thus, in view ofthe policy ofthe State which prescribes tfaat. as far as possible, the husband and wife must. be posted'at llie sa.me place, the petitioner oueht to ha.ve been oosted at the nearest'. olace ofnostine ofthe wife. 2, Leained counse! appearing for the Stete submits tliat ifthe petit.ioner alongwith his wrfe makes a. ioint reoreseatation raising their ^grievances. the sa.me shall be considered and decided svmoatheticaUv. ia accordance with law oa its owa merits. as exDeditiouslv as oossible. nreferablv within a. oeriod offour weeks, 3.' In view ofthe above. according to leamed counsel aooearing for the oetitioaer, nothing survives in this Detition for adiiidicatioa. 4. Accordinglv- fhe writ oetition 'is distx>sed of with tfae aforesaid observation. J;.' '. aji ! SATISH K. ANGNIHORI i, Judge