FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 503 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 503 OF 2006 APPEAL NO. 503 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Anup Pandey for appellant P.S.Hingorani APP for respdt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 7TH NOVEMBER, 2006 7TH NOVEMBER, 2006 7TH NOVEMBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 6-12-2005 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.1090 of 2005 whereby the learned Single Judge of this court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution for reasons mentioned in the order. 2. This appeal is directed against that order on the ground basically that the learned Judge was duty bound to decide the application under section 340 of Cr.P.C. His failure to do so is failure to exercise jurisdiction vested in him by law. Such appeal to challenge the order passed by the Single Judge of this High Court can be made before the Supreme Court of India. The objections raised by the office that the appeal is not tenable is correct. The appeal is therefore not maintainable and is therefore rejected. ...