IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4900 of 2010 MOST. SAMPATO KUWAR Versus RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ANR. ----------- 3. 9.3.2011. Heard. Mr. Raghav Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. By order dated 21.7.2010 passed in C.R.No.417 of 2008, the petitioner was permitted to convert the civil revision application to a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, subject to fulfillment of other conditions within a period of four weeks from the date of the order, failing which the application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although he did take some steps for converting the civil revision application into a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, but some defects noticed during the Stamp Reporting by the office on 17.8.2010, remained to be fulfilled resulting in the dismissal of the application in view of the 2 peremptory order. He submits that the remaining defects shall also be removed without any further delay. Regard being had to the submissions and the statements made in the restoration application, the restoration application is allowed, the civil revision application bearing C.R.No.417 of 2008 is restored to its original file and the peremptory period is extended permitting the petitioner to remove the defects pointed out by the office within a period of two weeks from today failing which the application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)