BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15812 of 2011 MUKKAMMAL ...PETITIONER/SACCUSED Vs STAE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.68/2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. JAYAPAUL ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : Mr.R.RAMACHANDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 120(b) of IPC in Crime No.68 of 2011 and seeks anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of the defacto complainant is to the effect that A-1 to A-7 who are the owners of the disputed property are said to have executed a sale deed in favour of the defacto complainant's wife and again, they have executed a power of attorney document in favour of another person. As such, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on allegation that the petitioner is also involved in selling the property by a false power of attorney and the investigation is pending. 4.The fact remains that the entire allegations are bone out by the records and documents. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the fact that the co- accused was also granted Anticipatory Bail, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I TIRUNELVELI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. JAYAPAUL ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.44742 rl/6c – 22.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15812 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/