IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.VENKATESWARA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14122 of 2006 Between: P.Narendar ..... PETITIONER AND Hon,ble Principal District & Sessions Judge, Khammam/Disciplinary Authority, Khammam. .....RESPONDENT ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki) The petitioner had been retired prematurely. He filed Writ Petition No.8299 of 2006, which was allowed by this Court. This Court noted that five enquiries were pending against the petitioner and since the charges leveled against him, in which enquiries were pending, were taken into consideration, and the petitioner was retired prematurely, therefore, we had allowed the Writ Petition and directed the respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders. It appears that immediately after we passed the orders, the learned Sessions Judge reinstated the petitioner and posted him as copyist in the existing vacancy at Manuguru. The petitioner is now aggrieved of the order of transfer. There are no grounds to interfere with the order of transfer. The Writ Petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the respondent is directed to complete the five enquiries pending against the petitioner within a period of three months. No costs. -------------------------------- - (Bilal Nazki, J) 13th July, 2006 ---------------------------------- (M.Venkateswara Reddy, J) LUR