BA-102-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.102 OF 2011 [For cancellation of bail] Daljitsingh @ Bablu Tejinder Singh Sethi ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru' CID Crime Branch, Kalyan & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Avinash Birajdar, i/b. Mr. R.V. Bansode, for the Applicant. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP, for the Respondent No.1. Mr. P.D. Prasad for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. The Investigating Officer is present in person. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 6 TH JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Mr. Birajdar, holding for Mr. Bansode, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, prays for keeping the matter back. In the circumstances, prayer is rejected. 3. On the last date itself, the learned APP for Respondent No.1, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, had stated that a report under Section 169 of the BA-102-11.sxw 2 Dixit Code of Criminal Procedure was being filed by the Investigating Agency in the matter for the release of the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4. Today also the same statement is made. 4. In fact, in view of this statement, Mr. Bansode, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, had sought a short adjournment to obtain instructions in the matter. Today, Mr. Bansode is not present and on his behalf Mr. Birajdar made a prayer for keeping the matter back. 5. When the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 are sought to be released on the ground that the evidence against them is deficient, I see no point in considering the application for cancellation of bail. The Applicant will have his remedies before the Magistrate, if, according to him, the decision of the Investigating Agency is wrong. 6. The Application is rejected. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]