IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3225 OF 2011 BETWEEN 1. Shankar Goud and others … Petitioners AND 1. The State of A.P through Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad. 2. M. Subramanyam … Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3225 OF 2011 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) for quashing the First Information Report in Crime No.116/11 on the file of Miyapur Police Station in Cyberabad. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 447, 427 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘I.P.C.’). It is seen that the petitioners on one side and the de facto complainant on the other are setting up rival claims of title to the property in question. The grievance of the petitioners is that earlier they filed O.S.No.98 of 2010 which is a suit for mere injunction against one D. Ananda Rao in the Court of the VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar and that suit was decreed and therefore they are entitled to the land in question. 3. It is seen that the de facto complainant was not a party to the said suit. This apart, the de facto complainant claims to have purchased the property from the original owners who got it in the earlier suit in C.S No.14 of 1958 on the file of this Court. It is also the case of the de facto complainant that the accused-petitioners herein got it under unregistered sale deeds which are said to have been got validated by the petitioners under the Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights in Land Act. Thus, what should be noted is that de facto complainant is not a party to the suit O.S.No.98 of 2010. 4. Then, going by the allegations in the First Information Report, it cannot be said that the said allegations, even if totally believed do not disclose any offences. Hence, I am of the opinion that there is no ground to quash the First Information Report which is under investigation. It shall be always open for the petitioners and also to de facto complainant to put-forth their claims regarding title to the property before the concerned police and the police shall look into the same in investigation. 5. Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed. ______________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J April 13, 2011 SP THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3225 OF 2011 April 13, 2011 SP