IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20382 of 2011 Madhu Srivastava & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 8th July 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Smt. Rita Verma for the State. It happens to be a case of unfortunate murder of a bride while she was staying at her Sasural for which petitioners along with others including the husband of the deceased were made accused. After concluding investigations charge-sheet was submitted against the husband including others exonerating the petitioners but after a lapse of two years, as per Annexure-5, the prosecution has prayed for issuance of non bailable warrant of arrest against them. It has also been submitted that husband of deceased had already been granted bail vide order dated 26.11.2010 in Cr.Misc.No. 39399 of 2010. On the other hand, learned APP opposes the prayer and submits that there happens to be consistent material with regard to demand of dowry as well as 2 torture meted out to the deceased at the hands of petitioners including others but further fairly concedes that husband of the deceased had already been granted bail. The learned APP further concedes over another factual aspect that is emerging out from charge-sheet divulging the fact that no material was found against the petitioners till submission of C.S. In the aforesaid background, petitioners, namely, 1) MADHU SRIVASTAVA, 2) PAPPU KUMAR, 3) VIVEK KUMAR @ VIVEK @ DABLU, 4) SONI DEVI AND 5) MINU DEVI are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in Ara Town P.S. Case No. 370 of 2009, in the event of arrest or surrender within a fortnight subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)