IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6012 of 2010 VINAY SINGH, SON OF BANGALI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-CHAKKI SOHAGPUR, P.S. PAROO, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR……………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………..OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Arun Kumar Arun and Sanjay Kishore Singh, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 25.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of firing is upon the co-accused, Pappu Singh and Petu Sahani whereas the co-accused, Suresh Singh appears to be the order giver. It has also been submitted that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner in the First Information Report as he was merely the member of the unlawful assembly. It is also contended - 2 - that the co-accused, Suresh Singh, has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order as contained in Annexure-‘2’ to the application. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Vinay Singh, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Lal Bahadur, J.M. Ist Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No.38/06. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)