THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3237 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: Despite service of notices, none appears for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 12.06.2009, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, dismissing the application in I.A.No.376 of 2009 in O.S.No.3669 of 2004, filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying the Court to re-open the evidence of the plaintiff to produce evidence to disprove the will-Ex.B-1, which is produced after closure of the evidence. 4. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants in the suit. 5. For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in the suit. 6. The whole controversy is with regard to the genuineness or otherwise of the signatures allegedly made by the father of the petitioner, who is no more, on the will-Ex.B-1. 7. The said application appears to have been made by the plaintiff seeking to compare the signatures of her deceased father on the will with that of the signatures available with his employer i.e., Andhra Cement Company, Chandralok Complex. 8. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff that the admitted signatures of the deceased father of the plaintiff are not available anywhere and the documents that are available with Andhra Cement Company are the only documents on which the signatures of the deceased father of the plaintiff are available. Therefore, the alleged signatures of the deceased on the will are to be compared with that of the signatures available with the said Company. I find some force in the said contention. 9. The suit is for partition and the plaintiff is a lone and unmarried person. There is no information from any other family members and the plaintiff is totally relying on the property that is likely to be devolved on her from her deceased father. In such circumstances, I feel it appropriate to allow the Civil Revision Petition. 10. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 20th November 2009 dr