IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT APPEAL NO : 1337 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 27/07/2004 in WP No. 13026 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: N. Lakshminarayana Goud, S/o. Balaraj Goud, R/o. H.No. 1-14-29, Lothukunta, Secunderabad - 15. ..... APPELLANT AND 1.The Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration & Stamps, A.P. Hyderabad. 2. The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad. 3.The District Registrar, R.R. District at Moosapet, Hyderabad. 4.The Sub-Registrar, Vallabhanagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 5.The Sub-Registrar, Vallabhnagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 6. The Sind Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., Prenderghast Road, Secunderabad, rep. by its Managing Director. 7.The Commissioner, Alwal Municipality, Alwal, Secunderabad. 8.J. Purushotham, S/o. J. Ramachandriah, R/o. 7-1-912, Subash Road, Secunderabad. 9. J. Srinivasulu, S/o. J. Ramachandraiah, R/o. 7-1-912, Subash Road, Secunderabad. 10.J. Krishna Murthy, S/o. J. Ramachandraiah, R/o. 7-1-912, Subash Road, Secunderabad. 11. J. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. J. Ramachandraiah, R/o. 7-1-912, Subash Road, Secunderabad. 12.Smt. P. Gracelatha, W/o. Prasangi, R/o. 14-21, Lothukunta, Alwal, Secunderabad. 13. Dr. P. Prasangi, S/o. P. Sudershan, R/o. 14-21/D, Lothukunta, Secunderabad. 14. P.S. Satyanandam, S/o. P. Sudershanam, R/o. H.No. 24-138, Indira Nagar, Lothukunta, Secunderabad. 15. P. Solomon Raju, S/o. P. Sudershanam, R/o. 1-3-62, Old Alwal, Secunderabad-10. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. D.V.Sitarama Murthy for Mr.P.Rajasekhar Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.7: Mr.R.Thimma Reddy SC for Telangana Municipalities. Counsel for Respondents 6 & 8 to 15: None appeared. The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per The Honourable Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice) At the stage of admission, the Writ Petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge with certain observations. Appeal is against the said order. Learned counsel for the appellant, frankly and rightly so, concedes that appellant’s remedy would be to approach the Civil Court or other appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance, and, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty reserved to question the action of the respondents. Prayer of the appellant is allowed, impugned order of learned Single Judge is set aside and the appellant is permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty reserved to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. Both the Appeal and Writ Petition stand disposed of. _______________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J. 21.9.2004 ________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. VR. To 1.The Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration & Stamps, A.P. Hyderabad. 2. The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad. 3.The District Registrar, R.R. District at Moosapet, Hyderabad. 4.The Sub-Registrar, Vallabhanagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 5.The Sub-Registrar, Vallabhnagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 6.The Commissioner, Alwal Municipality, Alwal, Secunderabad. 7. Two CCs to Govt. Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 8. Two CD copies.