HIGN<30URT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fSVNo. 1942 of 2008 Petitioners 1. 2. Vorsus Respondente 1. 2. 3. Prem Lal Meshram. S/o Shri Sukh Ram Meshram, Age about 54 yeare. Head Master, R/o College Road. Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Rewa Ram Dewangan, S/o Shri Murari Lal Dewangan, Age about 50 years, Asstt. Teacher, R/o near Bus Stand, RajnandQaon. Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary. Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Asststant Commissioner, Tritel Welfare Department. Distt.—Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Disfrict Education Officer, Distt. - Rajnanclgaon (C.G.) WRtT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTJON OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri AJay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri U. N. S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of April, 2008) The petitioners were appointed jnttjally, on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. The petitioners were thereafter, granted regular pay scate on compjetion of the probation period. The question of law invotved herein js, asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scaSe w.e.f. the date of inttial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counset appearing for ttie petftjoners, as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents/Stete, jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W. P. <S) No. 3566/2007 (Loknath Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 27.6.2007. 4. jn view <rf the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petitton is disposed of jn the same terms i.e. petitioners are entitled for regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment, subiect to verjficatjon of the facts. No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ''