IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35826 of 2009 1. CHANDAN KUMAR, S/O LATE BIJAY PRASAD, R/o MOHALLA - BALGOBIND BIGHA, P.S- SASARAM (T), DISTT- ROHTAS, AND 2. DEEPAK CHAUDHARY, S/O BABLU CHAUDHARY, R/O MOHALLA -NEEL KOTHI, P.S- DEHRI, DISTT-ROHTAS ………………………………………………. PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………………… OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioners:- Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate. For the State:- Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 24.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that on the gun-point, the petitioners had snatched a Lenovo Laptop, a mobile phone and Rs. 5,000/- from the informant, who had recognized them and informed the police, but prior to the arrival of the police, they had fled away. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in the first information report it has been stated that everybody had covered their faces; still the petitioners have been named. It is also stated that allegedly the information regarding the occurrence was given to the police and the police came to the place of occurrence, 2 but prior to that, petitioners had fled away and the police had even scolded the informant. The alleged occurrence is of 31st July, 2009 but the first information report was lodged on 02.08.2009. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the petitioners were actually caught by the informant, but they had fled away prior to the coming of the police. However, the snatched articles could not be recovered. Petitioner no. 2 is also involved in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian penal Code. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioners, namely, Chandan Kumar and Deepak Chaudhary to be released on bail on their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dehri P.S. Case No. 339/09, with the condition that one of the bailors for each of the petitioners should be their family member or close relative and, to this effect, the bailors must swear affidavits showing their genealogy as to how they are related to the petitioners. It is further directed that after 3 the release in this case, if the petitioners are again found to be involved in a criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )