IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40020 of 2010 VIJAY LAL KARN @ VINAY LAL KARN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offences are under compoundable Sections that is 406, 420, 504, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court states that compromise was no ground for reconsideration of the prayer. The offences being compoundable, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 40 of 99, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)