IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11917 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Sharda Devi W/O Krishna Prasad R/O Mali Tola, Ward No.1, Village & P.S.- Nasariganj, Distt.- Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, I.C.D.S., Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Patna 5. The District Magistrate, Rohtas 6. The District Programme Officer, Rohtas 7. The Block Development Officer, Nasariganj (Rohtas) 8. The Child Development Project Officer, Nasariganj (Rohtas) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bajarangi Lal For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Ga5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 2 22-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The writ application was filed on 20.7.2010 after serving two copies in the office of the Advocate General. No counter affidavit has been filed till date. The petitioner is aggrieved by denial of work and salary to her as an Angan Bari Sahayika. It is acknowledged that on 11.1.2010 she was given a show cause notice which was duly replied to by her but without passing any final orders, she has been divested of agency and stipend. Let the petitioner appear before the District Programme Officer along with a copy of the present order as Patna High Court CWJC No.11917 of 2010 (2) dt.22-11-2011 2 also proof in support of her claim that she replied to the show cause notice. The District Programme Officer shall call for the original records in her presence. If the District Programme Officer is satisfied from the original records and/or the petitioner is unable to demonstrate that she had submitted the reply, the District Programme Officer is not required to take any steps under the present order. Conversely, if the petitioner satisfies the District Programme Officer that she had submitted a reply to the show cause, the District Programme Officer shall examine the original records to satisfy himself if there is a final order. If there is no final order, the petitioner shall stand reinstated when the District Programme Officer may proceed to pass a final order after hearing the petitioner. If there is a final order in the records which was never communicated to the petitioner, then also the petitioner is required to be reinstated, heard and a final order passed. Let the District Programme Officer comply the directions within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before him provided the petitioner cooperates. The application stands disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)