CWP No.10227 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.10227 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.04.2010 **** Mohinder Kaur and another . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Addl. AG, Punjab ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Learned State counsel has placed on record the order dated 27.03.2010, whereby, the Director General of Police has approved the absorption of the petitioners as Lady Constables and have also allotted the Constabulary numbers to them. (2). In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous, however, with a clarificatory direction that let the verification and other requisite formalities be got completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. CWP No.10227 of 2009.doc - 2 – (3). As regards the petitioners’ claim for retrospective absorption as Constables, liberty is granted to them to submit a representation to the competent authority ‘through proper channel’, which shall be considered sympathetically as per Government policies and the same shall be decided as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (4). Ordered accordingly. (5). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 05.04.2010 vishal shonkar