IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.712 of 2007 BINOD KUMAR YADAV –Versus- STATE OF BIHAR & ORS - --------- 3. 3.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is the informant. He is aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 18.4.2007 whereunder Opposite Party No.2 has been convicted for the offence under Section 307 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years. Opposite Party No.3, however, has been acquitted. The grievance of the informant is that Opposite Party No.2 ought to have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and Opposite Party No.3 should also have been convicted. From perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that the court below having discussed the testimony of the witnesses has convicted Opposite Party No. 2 and acquitted Opposite Party No.3 and considering the nature and gravity of the allegation has sentenced Opposite Party No.2 to undergo R.I. for ten years. I do not see any illegality in the impugned judgment and this revision application, is accordingly dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.) - 2 -