IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9301 of 2005 SUSHIL CHANDRA JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 7 23.07.2008 Heard counsel for the parties. It appears that of the two reliefs prayed by the petitioner in this writ application, one of them relating to his transfer on the ground of threat to his life has already been given to him by the respondents. Counsel for the petitioner, in fact, has also submitted that second part of the grievance of the petitioner has been also redressed in part, inasmuch as, he has been allowed payment of salary with effect from 7.1.2005. He, however, says that the authorities have not yet taken a final decision with regard to payment of salary for the period 17.6.2004 to 2.6.2005 on the ground that there are no records to show that he had discharged his official duty in this period. Counsel for the State has in this regard has referred to Annexure-H of the counter affidavit to contend that this very issue was under consideration before the Civil Surgeon, 2 who had also given opportunity to the petitioner to prove his case that he had actually functioned between 17.6.2004 to 6.9.2005 but a final decision could not be taken by him due to non-submission of the relevant proof of his working. In view of the fact that a final decision with regard to payment of salary for the period 17.6.2004 to 6.9.2005 has not yet been taken as is apparent from the perusal of Annexure-H to the counter affidavit, this Court would direct the petitioner to file a self contained representation with all evidences and proof of his working in the period from 17.6.2004 to 6.9.2005, before the Civil Surgeon of Vaishali district, who after its receipt will take a final decision within a period of six months in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observations this writ application is disposed of. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)