1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2983 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Ms. Soma Singh i/b Mr. Vivek Sharma for the petitioner. Ms. S.V. Gajare, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate by a well reasoned under section 203 of the Cr. P.C. had dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner. The learned 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, 2 Bombay has again for good reasons dismissed the revision application filed by the petitioner. 3. The view taken by the two courts below for dismissing the complaint is a possible view and does not require interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. Apart from that, it appears that there is a civil dispute between the parties and that is sought to be converted into a criminal case, which the two courts below have not allowed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)