1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 4875/2010 Smt Ojaswita Vs State of Rajasthan 10.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Peush Nag - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the person in whose bank account amount was transferred is no more. In view of above, petitioner is not beneficiary out of the occurrence. Thus, petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but 2 looking to the facts of this case, I allow bail application of petitioner under section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Alwar Gate, Ajmer is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Smt Ojaswita in FIR No.105/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 420, 406 and 120-B IPC, he shall enlarge petitioner on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)She shall make herself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)She shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)She shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)She shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma