IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.619 OF 2010 IN M.C.A. ST. NO.7456 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 18206 OF 2009. (RAJARAM GANPAT DORKAR...VS.. TUKARAM VITTHAL BHAGAR & ORS.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Alok Daga, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of the legal representatives of deceased respondent No.5, though served. For the reasons stated in the civil application the prayer made in the civil application is granted as the application is filed within the prescribed period of limitation. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. CAO NO.618/2010. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of the respondents, though served. The respondents have also not filed reply to the civil application. Hence, for the reasons stated in the civil application the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A.ST.NO. 7456/2010. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of the respondents, though served. For the reasons stated in the application the prayer made in the civil application is granted. The Second Appeal is restored to file. The application is allowed and disposed of. The office objections, if any, should be removed within a period of two weeks. JUDGE RR.