IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5107 of 2011. Date of Decision : July 5, 2011 Sh. Rajesh Sharma … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The present writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(a) That the impugned order of transfer annexure P-2 may kindly be quashed and set-aside being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional & in contravention to the policy & guidelines which have been framed by the respondents for regulating the transfer of its employees. (b) That the respondent may kindly be directed to allow the applicant to work at the present place of posting keeping in view the instructions mentioned in chapter 21 of the Hand book on personnel matters being a small petty class IV employee, who is the only source of bread & butter to his entire family. (c) That the respondents may also be directed to produce the entire pertaining to the request made by 2 the petitioner for his transfer as has been reflected by the respondents in the impugned transfer order P-2.” 2. It is seen from the pleadings that both the petitioner and third respondent are aggrieved by their transfer and they are not interested in the transfer. It appears that the parties have not completed their term as per the policy. Also both the petitioner and the third respondent have submitted their grievances before the second respondent by way of Annexures P-3 and P-4. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into Annexures P-3 and P-4 and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. Till orders are passed, as above, the impugned order of transfer will not be implemented. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of , so also the pending application(s) if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. July 5, 2011 (PK/hl)