^ c.^ {ol^-, < IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. $^/53 / 2008 Petitioner / / Harshvir Gupta 54 Yrs., Plaintiff- S/o Late Dr. Mahavu- Smgh Respondent Gupta, Flat # 8 (RDA Shopping Complex) Near DEO Office, Tagore Nagar, Raipur ^^•%s-" ...^^^®^"" -.-••^^.^" Respondents / Defendant - Appellant Proposed Respondents (ByvirtueofO. Ir. 10 CPC, 1908 Application) VERSUS / ]_ Raipur Development Authority, By Chief Executive Officer, Oppo. Tehsil Office, GE Road Raipur /2. SiyeshKumar /3^ Vinod / 4^ Shankar 5_ Anup 2 to 5 S/o Giirudasmal 6^ Smt Pushpa Devi wd./o Indrapal 7_ Manish S/o Indrapal 2to 7R/0 Vidyanagar Bilaspur ^ Smt. Mohinidevi w/o Satish Kumar R/o Nagpirr ^9^ Smt. Champadevi., w/o Lalchand Kukreja R/o At & PO Pandri Raipur ^MSmt. Rajkumari w/o Manoj Kumar Vadhwani R/o Shah Jahanabad Bhopal (MP) llSmt. Indradevi w/o Gianchand Davani R/o Indrapuri, Indore 2 to 11 By Attomey Roop Meghani, S/o Bamnomal Meghard, At & PO Civil Lines Raipur PETITION UNDER ARL227 OF THE CONSTITUTION /' n Mia SESSS" TSf I5W W 'lfW 'TOW^i%t)W ?^ '::qiqR:p?, •s^re^', f^ircro ^, •sxnwjs, T^iras? ^-,, oT.^ i^'p. 7^''73"^t> •5 4 ^~5/6g •sn^T'q^yC'ptg^iT). SBTBCTr.'»HKL.JUSn<^1ftIfc-AaM¥W&b 17-8-20Q9 None appears for fhi appeUant. The matter was caU^d twice, even fhen none appears for the appellant. In the circumstanc^s, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss (he appeal^ The appeal is dismi^sed for non-prosecution. ^r' judSe Jf ?3T'; ;F?'II®Tt!..RK?IT.T—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00.000. 4-: