IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52869 of 2008 Bibha Devi @ Bibha Singh Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- For the petitioner—Birendra Kumar For the State--- Pronoti Singh APP 3 26.08.2011 The petitioner has filed this petition for quashing the cognizance order dated 22.2.08 passed in Athmalgola P.S.Case No. 330/2000 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistratwe, Barh whereby six accused persons including the petitioner have been summoned finding case under Section 498A, 494,323,307,380,504,506 and ¾ by the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that as per allegation of the F.I.R the petitioner is said to be second wife of Mithlesh Singh husband of the complainant/ informant but the petitioner is not married with Mithlesh Kumar Singh and has been falsely implicated in this case. From the impugned order it appears that on perusal of the statement of the witnesses of the case diary the learned A.C.J.M has took the cognizance of the offence against the accused including the petitioner in the aforesaid sections. Apparently there is nothing showing the misuse of the process of the Court as such the impugned order does not warrant for interference in inherent jurisdiction by this Court. As far as the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned that is the defence and petitioner is at liberty to takel defence in trial at 2 appropriate stage. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)