IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4130 of 2011 ARBIND PRASAD, SON OF KARU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but it appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation, the name of this petitioner came in this case and when he was put on Test Identification Parade, he was identified by the informant. Although, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me by placing this submission that petitioner used to visit to the village of the informant and that is why the informant implicated the petitioner in the alleged crime but I am not, at all, convinced with his submission. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No. 52 of 2010, stands rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)