IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2867 of 2007 Shri Kant Prasad Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 4 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2, however, the same is mentioned as supplementary show cause. Let the same be taken as a show cause on behalf of the opposite party no.2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the order of the Court has been complied with by passing the necessary orders as per memo no. 543 dated 12th September, 2011. Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order is not correct and as such petitioner proposes to assail the same before the appropriate forum. Be that as it may, since the order of the Court has been complied with, the contempt application need not proceed and the same accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)