^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR t»n Kipt w »ja. •^ib^-ji 4iii Chliatrapal Singh, aged 40 years, son of Sbri Khuman Singh, Taawar (ST), resident of vfflage Majhgawaa, Gram Panchayat Mahora, Tehsfl. Marwahi, District BUaspur (CG) Vs. 1. State of Chliattisgarh, fhrough the Secretaiy, Paitchayat Departinent, Raipur (CG) 2. Director, Pauchayat, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 3. Additionat Collector, Pendraroad, Distnct Bilaspur (CG) 1SRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA : Hon'ble Mr. Satisli K. Agnitootrl, J.( Shri Somnaffa Venna, counsel fer the petitmner. Shri Sum.esh Bajaj, Qovertuaent Advocate tbr fhe State. ORDBR (Passed oa thls 23"1 day of October, 2007) The petitioner, by way of ftus petition irupugns fhc order dated 3.10.2007, passed by fhe Director, Panchayat, Govenunent of Chliattisgarh, Raiptir aud fhe order dated 16/17.08.2007 passed by Additlonal CoUector, Pendra Road, District Bflaspur on several grounds. The order dated 16/17.08.2007 was passed on the coinplaiat inade by one Shri Vijay Bahadur, Son of .ingnnnnth, resident of viflage Pendra, TahsU Pendra Road, District Bilaspur. In appeal, agaiast the said order, the Director has passed fhe order on 3.10.2007 wluch is impugned herein. On being poiated out fhat Shri Vijay Bahadur, Son of Jagacmath, resident of vill^e Pendra, Tahsfl Pendra Road, District Bflaspur is not a party to this petition, leamed coiinsel submits fhat Shri Vijay Bahadur is not a resident of Gram Pauchayat, Pendra, theretbre it is not necessary to implead him. as a party/respondent. ^'":'-'.^?^^^&^ -2-- Be fhat as it may, siuee the complamtwas imtiated at the mstauce of Mr. Vijay Bahadur, fhe order iaipugned Iierem cannot be considered in the absence of Mr. Vijay Bahadiir, who is not being impleaded as a party as he is necessary party to fhis petition. Accordmgly, this petition is dismissed as not inamtainable. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge > ^/ "