IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 22228 of 2004 Between: N.Seethamma W/o.Brahmaiah, President, Mandal Parishad, Nadendla, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Parishad, Nadendla, Guntur District. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector and Magistrate, Guntur District,Guntur. 4. Gorre Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, MPTC, Satuluru-1, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 5. Garapati Pullaiah, S/o. Lakshmaiah, MPTC, Girijavolu, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 6. Chittala Chinna Ranga Rao, S/o. Lingaiah, MPTC, Endugupalem Village, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 7. Sirikonda Veeraiah, S/o. Veera Swamy, MPTC, Sankuratripadu, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 8. N. Ratnakumari, W/o. Sundar Raju, MPTC, Kanaparru Village, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 9. Gangireddy Soureelu, W/o. Koti Reddy (late), MPTC, Tubadu Village, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 10. Godugunoori Rami Reddy, S/o. Balakoti Reddy, MPTC, Chandavaram Village, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 11. Gurram Rama Devi, W/o. Upendra, MPTC, Appapuram Village, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. 12. Musugu Sobharani, W/o. Raja Rao, MPTC, Satuluru II, Nadendla Mandal, Guntur District. (RR 4to12 impleaded as per court order dt. 20-12-2004 in WPMP 30706 of 2004) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in not implementing the resolution passed in the General body meeting, dated 08-03-2004 and consequent proceedings R.C.No.128/02/C/Dated 21-06-2004 of Mandal Parishad Development Office, Mandal Parishad, Nadendla, not handing over the minutes book to the petitioner and trying to execute some other works without there being any resolution in the said meeting as illegal, arbitrary and unauthorized and consequently direct the 1st Respondent not to commence any new works with out any resolution of the Mandal Parishad other than the works passed in the meeting dated 08.03.2004 and consequent proceedings in R.C. No.128/02/C/ dated 21-6-2004 of Mandal Parishad Development Office, Mandal Parishad, Nadendla. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 12: Mr.M.Ravindranath Reddy and Mr. B.V.Krishna Rao The Court made the following : O R D E R : After hearing the counsel for the parties at length, I dictated the order in part yesterday. Today the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Therefore, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with costs quantified at Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only) payable to each set of contesting respondents. ______________________ C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, J. Dated: 15th March, 2005 Note: Office to issue C.C. today. B/O cs MEMORANDUM OF COSTS For Respondents Rs. Ps. Stamp for Vakalatnama Rs.3,000/- (*to each set of contesting respondents as fixed by His Lordship.) Advocate’s fee Translation and printing charges _________________________ To be paid by the petitioner to the each set of contesting respondents. Rs. 3,000-00 ps. _________________________ (Rupees Three Thousand only) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Parishad, Nadendla, Guntur District. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector and Magistrate, Guntur District,Guntur. 4. Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 5. Two CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MVK}