In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 2262 of 2009 Date of decision: April 24, 2009 Kanwaljit Singh and another .. Petitioners Vs. Mahinderjit Kaur and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J This revision petition is against the order dated 31.3.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur, vide which the Court omitted to frame certain issue which clearly arose out of the pleadings of the parties. The learned counsel has stated that the plaintiff has actually challenged the sale deeds made by the defendants No.1, 2, 4 and 5 in favour of the defendants No.6, 7, 9, 22 and 23 as mentioned in the plaint and stated that the same are invalid, illegal, null and void and not binding on Ripudaman Kaur and now on plaintiffs and defendant No.25, but the trial court has omitted to frame this issue. The matter regarding framing of issue is a matter clearly within the domain of the court who was to frame issues from the pleadings of the parties. If the Court could omit, alter or add the issues at any appropriate stage as and when it comes to its notice. Under these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to give a fresh look to the issues and to frame any such issue if it ought to have been framed. April 24, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge