IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2677 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 18, 2011 Rajender .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No.51089 of 2010 For reasons given in the application, delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. Application is allowed. Crl. Revision No.2677 of 2010 In the context of the same FIR and judgment of conviction, revision filed by co-accused viz. Criminal Revision Crl. Revision No.2677 of 2010 [2] No.2589 of 2009 titled ‘Girdhari Lal vs. State of Haryana’ has been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 19.4.2010. 2. No ground for interference in this revision petition also, is made out for reasons given in the case of co-accused Gurdhari Lal (supra). 3. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 18, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?