1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.4 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8761 OF 2007 Pushkar Sakharam Choudhari & Ors. .. Appellants. Versus Prashant Ambadas Choudhari & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.S.S. Kulkarni for the appellants. Mr.Shailesh V. More for respondents No.1 and 2. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 28th January, 2008 DATED : 28th January, 2008 DATED : 28th January, 2008 P.C. : 1. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the parties have agreed that the revisional order dated 29-06-2007 be set aside and the authorities be called upon to pass an order afresh in accordance with law after hearing the parties to the present petition. 2. We may notice that the learned Single Judge by order dated 23-12-2007 which is impugned in the present appeal had first recorded the statement that the revisional proceedings before the revisional authorities were not maintainable but still would not disturb the order and left the parties to get the dispute resolved in relation to immovable 2 properties in civil proceedings uninfluenced by the order of the revisional authority. It is apparent that under the Revenue Code, it is the competent authority who can pass an order, however, to a limited extent. 3. In the circumstances, we find that the parties have agreed that the competent authorities will hear the parties and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of the copy brought to the notice of the competent authority. 4. In view of this order, the appeal stands disposed with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.