sns IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1445 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.976 OF 2010 Smt. Bhagirathi H. Yadav and Ors. ..Applicants/Appellants. v/s. Dnyaneshwar V. Kate and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. R.B.Raghuwanshi i/by Ms Rutuja Ambekar, advs. for the Applicants. Mr. S.P.Thorat, adv. for the respondent no.10. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 29th September, 2011 PC : 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 Mr. Raghuvanshi the learned counsel for the applicants seeks modification of the order passed on 6th September, 2010 in Appeal From Order No.976 of 2010. According to him, appeal was pressed only in respect of the appellant no.3/original plaintiff no.3 and not for other three appellant nos.1, 2 and 4 in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents that they had already filed a pursis before the trial Court that they would not press the application Ex.43. Paragraph 2 of the order is self speaking as what had transpired before the Court. After hearing the parties, this Court had passed the order to expedite the trial of the suit. The learned counsel points that previous application for review of sns this order has been rejected by this Court. Not only this, the order was challenged before the Supreme Court by filing SLP, which is also dismissed. As per the directions given by this Court, suit is also disposed off finally. Therefore, at this stage, I do not see any reason to modify any part of that order. 3 Therefore, this application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)