IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.23 OF 2010 DATED:29.3.2010 Between: S.K. Agarwal … Appellant And The A.P. Housing Board, Rep. by its Vice-Chairman & Housing Commissioner Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.23 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) Narration of facts is uncalled for because of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant – petitioner seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. Having regard to the nature of the controversy, his prayer is conceded to. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a corollary, the writ appeal has become infructuous. Dismissed with liberty to the appellant – petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. However, it needs to be placed on record that in case any other remedy is invoked by the appellant – petitioner, it shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law and the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn shall not absolve him of the obligation to establish the basic requirements relating to the maintainability of the remedy he may opt for. SANJAY KUMAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 29-3-2010 B. Narsinga Rao