IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 971 of 2008 J. P. Tyagi ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……. Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. H.C. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioner, and as such the police has not submitted the charge-sheet against the petitioner. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 11.12.2008 shall remain operative till the final report is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 02.04.2009 Virendra