______________________ 1Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 2513/2010 Date of decision: 25 . 5. 2010 Sapna Vij …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ……Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting ?No. For the Petitioner: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CMP No. 3756/2010. Allowed. C.W.P. No. 2513/2010. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1 order of transfer. It is submitted that having undergone surgery twice (LSCS), she is not in a position to work in a hard area like Choori, where she has to walk long for reaching the School. It is also submitted that the child of the petitioner is only five months old. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already worked for around seven years in hard area. All these aspects, the - 2 - petitioner may point out before the second respondent by appropriate representation, within a week from today, in which case, the second respondent will look into the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within another one week. In case, the petitioner has not been already relieved as on today, further proceedings in that regard, will be deferred till order is passed by the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice Surinder Singh), May 25,2010 Judge (cm/PDs)