IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G. SECOND APPEAL No.5él [2005. 31mg gem SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908 APPELLANT . Lal Slngh S/o Late Shrl Shamsher gfLAINTIFF f Smgh Aged about— 3O years Re51dent of Tarbahar, Near Sh1v Mandlr, Tahs11 and District— Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENT /’Chhotala Bai, W/o. Late Shri ; . g/1’3EFENDANT 4k Q Shamsher Singh, Aged about: 80 yeags, Res1dent Tarbahar, Near Sh1V Mandlr, Tahsil and District— Bilaspur (C G ) Appellant Versus Respondent Chhotala Bai ‘ Present: Shri Anand Kumar Gupta, counsel with the appellant Lal Singh ‘ Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, counsei With the respondent Chhotala Bai: Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure OLOER (Passed on 24 February; 201 0) Leamed counsel for the parties are heard on I.A.No.3; under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recording compromise. 2. l.A.No.3 bears the signature of the appellant and the thumb impression of the respondent. The partiesware identified: by their respective counsel. 'lt has been mentioned in the application that the appellant and the respondent have agreed togsettle all the disputes between them and the rappellantand the respondent are treating each other as son and mother. The respondent has‘entere’d into the compromise without fear or pressure, andthe appellant shall take care hergdeath, he will \perform all ceremonies acgordingto the family rules and customs. \ \a ’ 1A 3. The main issue in the suit was whéther the appellant was the adopted eson Aof‘the respondent. Now, in yiew of the Wcompromise between the patties, the said issue has been settledbetween the parties outside the Court and they have prayed for passinga decree in tenns of the settlement. 4. The compromise is recorded and accordingly I.A.No.3 is allowed. Consequently, the Jpresent second appeal is disposed of! in the ‘~ following terms of the compromise: The respondent accepts the appellant as her adopted son. (ii The appellant and the respondent have agreed to settle all the disputes between them and both of them shall treat each other as son and mother. (iii) The appellant shall take care of all the needs of the respondent in future including performance of all obligations of a son which includes performance of all essential functions during the «lifetime of the respondent and upon her death. (i) 5. A decree be drawn-up accordingly. 6. Leamed counsel for the partiesvare directed to get the signature of the appellant and the thumb impression ofthe respondent appended in the order-sheet before the Additional Registrar (Judicial) today. J ‘ Prashant kumar Mishra l Judge SdF Gopal )