IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 294 of 2006 (M/B) Amarprit Singh Gill S/o Rajendra Pal Singh Gill, R/o 562, Phase X, Mohali, Punjab ......... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. through Secretary Home 2. Senior Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar. 3. Station House Officer, Roorkee, Police Station Roorkee, District Haridwar. 4. Pratap Singh Bedi S/o Kharak Singh Bedi, R/o Bedi Niwas, 190 Chaumandi, Roorkee, District Haridwar ........... Respondents Sri Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. Sri Subhash Chandra Tyagi, Advocate for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3. Sri Subhash Chandra Tyagi, Advocate for respondent No. 4. 2. Sri Sharma, The learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Amarprit Singh Gill seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him now has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner before the concerning Court. 3. Sri Pawan Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner seriously opposes the above submission of the learned Government Advocate. 2 4. In our opinion, as the investigation has already been completed and the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner, the writ petition, in the present form, has now become infructuous. 5. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 6. Consequently, the interim order dated 22.03.2006 stands vacates automatically. 7. With the above order, CLMA No. 3058 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 07.07.2006 07.07.2006 A