IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 14209 of 2011 Sohan Lal Verma & others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of UT Chandigarh and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sukant Gupta, Addl. P.P. for U.T. Chandigarh, Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Though the prayer made in this petition is for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise, but it is fairly pointed out before me by the counsel for the parties that one petitioner from each side is declared proclaimed offender. One person is stated to be absent from trial also. It will not be appropriate to invoke jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. However, the parties, who are before this Court and are present and available for the trial, would be at liberty to make their pleas on the basis of this compromise and the trial Court would take that terms into consideration while deciding the case. All the facts necessary for deciding the case may be pleaded before the trial Court. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. December 09, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE