C. : 1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJULU WRIT APPEAL Nos.6414-6415/2011 IEDN-EX) BETWEEN: RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4711 BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE REPTED. BY ITS REGISTRAR. .APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR S BADAWADAGI, ADV.,) AND: I. AMOL BHANUDAS CHATE, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. 0CC: 2ND YEAR BAMS STUDEN R/O. SBVSJV MANDALS GRAMEEN AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, TERDAL, DIST:’ BELGAUM. 2. PRALAY PRABHAT ROY Sb. PRABHAT ROY AGE: 20 YEARS, 0CC: 2’ YEAR BAMS STUDENT R/O. SBVSJV MANDALS GRAMEEN AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, TERDAL. DIST: BELGAUM. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA BY ITS SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINE AND HOMEOPATHY, (MUSH) (EDUCATION POLICY SECTION) INDIAN RD CROSS. SOCIETY ANNEXE w BUILDiNG NO. 1, RED CROSS ROAD, NEW DELHI 10001. 4. CENTRAL COUNCI’ OF INDIAN MEDICINE RVED B 115 SLCREiAR \O ul 61 INSTITUTiON RE OP D BLOOI\ JANAIKAPUR! NE\V DELHI 1 bOSS 5. SBVSJV MANDALS GRAM EEN AYURVED1C MEDICAL COLLEGE TERDAL. DIST: BAGALEOT [31 ITS PRINCIPAL. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH.I.ZIRALI ADV. FOR C/RI,R2) THESE WRIT APPEALS FILED L/S.4 OF THE R\RN\F\k HIGH eOLRT WT PRVO\O 10 SF1 SIDI DIE ORDER DATED: 15/10/2011 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE MADE IN W.P.NO.6395763958/20l I (EDNEX). THESE APPEALS COMING ON [A R PRELIMINAR HEARING THIS DAY, K.L.MANJUNATH, J, DELI\ERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The appellant,’ university is challenging the legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 6395J- 958/2011[EDNcEX] appelIant/universitv directed to declare the results cv t :3: of the examination held during June-July 2011 in which the respondents 1 and 2 have appeared. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents submit that the order of the learned Single Judge may be set aside and the Writ Petition filed by them may be dismissed in view of the amendment brought into the Universities Act in 2006. Accordingly, these Writ Appeals are allowed and the judgment of the learned Single Judge is set aside and consequently, the Writ Petition filed by the respondents is dismissed. sd/I. JUDGE Mb 3TJDGE RICK!