T9 1+ TT %. 28.07.2010 Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State/R-l with Woman ASI Sumedha, police station Nanak Fura. Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. for respondent No. 2 with respondent No. 2 in person. . + Crl. M.A. No. 12782l2O1O (exemptionl a* Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl. M.C. No. 2392l2O1O 1. Respondent No. 2 and petitioner No. 3 were married according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies on 2oth November, 2oo2. Petitioner Nos. r, 2, 4 and 5 are relatives of petitioner No. 3. Due to temperamental differences petitioner No. 3 and respondent No. 2 started living separately since Februar5r, 2OO8. 2. on the complaint of respondent No. 2 FIR No. 74l2oo9 under Sections 498-A/ 406 /34 IPC was registered at police station cwc Nanakpura on 23,d M.y, 2OOg. Now, pafties have settled their disputes amicably with the intervention of their family members and common friends. Petitioner No. 3 ald respondent No. 2 have 1 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified \./ t decided to part ways. In fact, they have obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent from the court of learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, South-O1 on 12tt' July, 2OIO. Respondent No. 2 has no objection if FIR in question is quashed. / 3. Keeping in mind the fact that both the parties have ""{tl"d their disputes amicably and even taken decree of divorce, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. In the larger interest, I quash the FIR No.7412009 under Sections 498-4 l406/34 IPC registered at police station CWC Nanakpura and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. 4. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. 5. Dasti. Ne A.K. PATHAK, J. 28,2OLO at ' July rb