IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10474 of 1999 Between: 1 S.V. Subba Reddy S/o. S. Subba Reddy Elecy. Revenue Office, A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 2 Y. Krishna Murthy S/o. Y. Sreenivasa Moorthy Elecy. Revenue Office, A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 3 N. Chandra Sekhar S/o. Pamulety O/o. The Divisional Elecl. Engineer, (Operation) A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 4 S. Lakshmi Prasad S/o. Rama Subbaiah Electricity Revenue Office, A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 5 K. Varaprasada Reddy S/o. K. Vengala Reddy Electricity Revenue Office, A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 6 K. Swamy Reddy S/o. K. Venkata Reddy Electricity Revenue Office, A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 7 P. Thimothy S/o. Devadanam Electricity Revenue Office, A.P. Transco, Nandyal. 8 E. Venkateswara Gowd S/o. E. Sivasankara Goud O/o. The Superintending Engineer, (Operation) Circle, A.P. Transco, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The A.P. Transmission Corporation (Previously part of APSEB) Rep. by its Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, (Operation) Circle, A.P. Transco., Kurnool. 3 The Chief Engineer (Electy.,) Cuddapah Zone, A.P. Transco, Cuddapah. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or a direction mostly one which is in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the Transco O.O.No.89, dt.3-4-1999 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unjustified, unconstitutional, unsustainable and unreasonable and contrary to the BPMS No. 99, dt.29-1-1988 and the relevant rules and regulations issued in BPMS No.89, dated 2-2-1970 and set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.SAMINENI KISHORE The Court made the following : ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 30.06.2005 DR To 1 The Director, A.P. Transmission Corporation (Previously part of APSEB), Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, (Operation) Circle, A.P. Transco., Kurnool. 3 The Chief Engineer (Electy.,) Cuddapah Zone, A.P. Transco, Cuddapah. 4 2CD copies