1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 265 of 2011 Raju v. Mahendra and Mahendra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr V.A. Madnani, Adv for applicant Mr R.R. Johrapurkar, Adv for respondent Coram: A. P. Bhangale, J Dated: 27nd July 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for respondent. Applicant has taken exception to the order dated 1.4.2011 passed by District Judge-5, Nagpur in Misc. Criminal Application No. 151 of 2010 whereby pending the appeal substantive sentence imposed on the applicant is suspended but on the condition of the applicant depositing 50% of the amount of compensation in the court. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is an employee of Mahendra and Mahendra, earning salary of Rs. 10,000/- and he is unable to deposit 50% of the amount of compensation which comes to Rs. 50,000/-. As against this, learned counsel for the respondent Company states that if not 50% of the amount of compensation, the applicant should be directed to deposit 50% of the cheque amount which was for Rs. 79,180/-. Learned counsel for the applicant submits 2 that the suggestion given by learned counsel for the respondent Company would be acceptable to the applicant. 3. Hence, the impugned order is modified only to the extent that the applicant shall deposit 50% of the amount of cheque instead of 50% amount of the compensation with addition that the respondent Company shall be allowed to withdraw the said amount if deposited by the applicant on usual terms and conditions. Rest of the order shall remain as it is. Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE joshi