BBB Btl^i StS ^:s^!is B.Ba:y!; 181 1:111 SBI' 181 ^ 1111 IjB ^ | Bil IS Rilii'lj 'M Jil^:IIJ ^ III a !BII R-IIB III 11 H8a t»- fiBl fisij • c l^ (P o ^ KpV |T THE mGH COURT OF TUDICATUREAT BILASPUR J Wr4.t Petition^No. J^f^ o.C 2001 ^titioner / Ganga prasad Dansena S/o. Late shri Garju Dansena Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary school, Raigarh (under Transfsr to middle school) Tah. & Dist. Raigarh. Vs ,^"4' ..**^ ^^. .^ . Respondents , :^<>J..':;'T^</%'^>'Stdte of Chhattisgarh th: •••".'-i.,'-7''.^. Department of schQol edu 's^c' Department of schQol education \, D.K.S. Mantralaya, Raipur District Raipur. ' 2. District education 0-f.ficer Raigarh (Chhatt'i5garh) . 3. The principal, Govt. Girls Higher Sscondary school, Raigarh . (Chhattisgarh) . 4. Chief executive of.ficer Zila panchayat Rai^<rh (Chhattisgarh) Petitioncc under Article 226/227 of the constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ/direction/etc. iU ^' ss. Writ Petition No. 1414 of 2001 PettUoner : Ganga PrasadDansena Versus Respondenis : State of ChhatfisgarhandoShws SB : Hon'ble Shri SatishK.Aanihotri.J. Present: I^/. Mr. Manoj Paranjape, counselforttiepetftioner. Ms. DeepaH Pandey, Pane< lawyerfortte responderrts No. 1 to t/S*ato ^^^ufcii^ii ORDER (Passed on fhis 21 day ofFebnnry, 2007) The petitioner, while working as Assistant Teacher h) Gowamment Giris HigherSecondary School, Raigarh, was tran^erred to Micklle Sclwol, Nachanpali (Sarangarh) vide impugned order dated 31.7.2001 (P/4). Tnis Court vide interim order dated t4.6.2001 direcied ttiat unfilttie nwct data of hearing, the peUUoner shail not be relteved. Be that as .t msy, with the pass^s of Srets Siis psSSoR has bscorw !nfructuous,3S period of transfer is not appUcabls forsver, At ttiis p<^nt ^ Cme there te no question to ®®minefte ral'dity of the teuisfer oKier. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appnyriate orders kaeping in view the public interest and admin aBve eidgeney, wittiout insisUng w» compiiance of me eartier ffansrer order. ft is weii settied principie of iaw ihat iransfer .is »tinddence of sewfee and it is for the emptoyer to decide as to where a paiticuiar ofRcer/emptoyee ba postsd kesping in visw pubiic intersstss •A's!! as administr^ys s^ncy. This Court has limtted jurisdicUon to interfere in Ihe transfer matter andlhis Court can jnfcrfBro nnhi m tha caso nf nmuad fnalaflfja nnn-eninndttncB nf "—f authority passing the transfer ordw and transfer onler ncrt being m cwAmnity with the mles and regulations. 5. In view ofthe above. this peBtion stands dispossd <rf. No^ordwastoeosls. Sd/- Satish K. Ag.i ^'