CRR No.2245 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.2245 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.01.2011 Satnam Singh Rahi ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present revision is filed challenging the order dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barnala, thereby imposing penalty of Rs.50,000/- on the revisionist under Section 446 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as order dated 12.7.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barnala, confirming the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate. Learned counsel for the revisionist argued that penalty imposed of Rs.50,000/- is on the higher side. This Court vide order dated 8.9.2010 has directed to issue notices qua quantum of penalty only. CRR No.2245 of 2010 (O&M) -2- It is fairly conceded by the learned DAG, Punjab, that accused Prem Kumar has been produced before the Trial Court on 4.9.2010 and has been sent to judicial custody. In view of this, considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barnala, is modified to the extent that penalty of Rs.20,000/- shall be read instead of Rs.50,000/-. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh) Judge January 07, 2011 R.S.