c^i 9-0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAHISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. I'^iS /20W~f- WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiONOFJNDIA, PETITIONER ..••""/-^ ^s^-""' ..•^•^}^" ^""^'"/y''" •^'^' ...-•""' '^€--"""" '^' RESPONDENTS 1- <T'P."J' ^l^^* i5^A-°'^ 2. 'Rajkumar Patel, aged about 34 years, son of Shri Tilak Ram Patel, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Kamlapani, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Distt. Education Officer Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) cv 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER HI6H COUftT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. PfSl No 123 of 2007 Peljitfoner : JagatpalNikunj Versus Re^pondents ; State of Chhattisgarh <& onother W. P.(S) No. lZ4of2007 Pet^toner ; Venudhar Ijarckir Versus Keappndents ; Stateof Chhattis9arh <& another W. P.fS) No. 125 ttf 2007 Petitioner Ku. Jeevon Manju Xodxo (after marrtage Smt. Jeevan Manju Viswas) Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh <& others W P.(S)No 132 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Clament Kerkett-a State of Chhatt'isgarh A Snotheir W. P./SlNo. 138 wF 2007 Peti-t-ioner : t)ilipSingh Sidar 1 Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt'isgarh A another W. P.fSVNo. 143 of 2007 Petitioner : Trilochan Ncsyak Versus Res^ondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh A another W. P.fSlNo. 144 of 2007 Petrtioner Versus Resnbndents Kailashpati Nayak State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.(S) No. 146 of 2007 Peth^ioner : ftoop Narayan Ram Versus Respondents : State ofChhattisgarh d onother W. P.fSVNe. 148 of 2007 Pefitioner : RcykunKir Patel Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh & another W.P.tS)No. 152of2007 Petitioner : 5hyam MohonNayak Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'i^arh A ano-ther And W.P.(S)No. 160 of 2007 Pe-^itioner : Narendra 5in9h Nayak Verais Re^pondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh &ano-ther ^B: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Satish K. Agmhvtn, J Present: Shfi A.N. Bhakta, Adwcate for Ihe petitioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Geputy Sovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Oubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. 5unitaJain,Pa»ielLawyer for -the respondents/State. ^s. ORDER ffassed on -this 17th Day of January, 2007) The follot^ing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. AgnihofL J. 1. Learned 4»unset appearing for the petitioners as well as for the ; State/re^ondents jointly aibmit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P.(S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & anoltier vs. State of Chhatt'isgarh A o-riwrs), which was disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further submit that the questioniof law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions nwde by learned counsel for the purties these writ petitions are disposed of in •terms of the order dated 9.19.2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakeah Kumou' Sltou-ma&another vs. State of Chhattisgarh A others). No order <is ito costs. 3. A copy of •t+ijs order be placed on record in connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash