IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7614 of 2011 Date of Decision: May 02, 2011 M/s Gazebo Developers Private Limited .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rajesh Punj, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P-9) passed by Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala. 2. Learned counsel contends that in review jurisdiction, the application filed by respondent No.3 has been virtually allowed by way of impleading Department of Industries. Department of Industries is not a relevant party in view of the fact that petitioner purchased the plot from respondent No.3 and sanction of mutation is prayed for. 3. I have considered the contention of learned counsel. CWP No.7614 of 2011 [2] 4. Perusal of impugned order dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P-9) indicates that the parties were summoned for 18.1.2011. This Court has been informed that petitioner has already put in appearance and further proceedings are scheduled for 27.5.2011. Petitioner would be at liberty to take all the grounds taken in this petition before the authority. While proceedings are pending, however, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by Divisional Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala. 5. This Court does not find that civil rights of the petitioner have been adversely affected at this stage. No ground for judicial review of order dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P-9), in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, is made out. 6. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) May 02, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?