THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 5618 of 2009 Dated: 19.04.2010 Between: Shaik Shafi, Ananthapur District. … Petitioner And Smt. S.Salima Bee and 3 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 5618 of 2009 O R D E R : The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.117 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Guntakal. The suit is filed for permanent injunction restraining the respondents 2 to 4 herein from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The 1st respondent herein, who is a third party to the suit proceedings filed I.A.No.25 of 2008 under Order I Rule 10 of C.P.C. to implead her as defendant No.4 to the suit pleading that she is in actual possession of a part of the suit schedule property. It is also pleaded that the suit was filed suppressing her title and possession to the said property. After hearing both the parties, the Court below allowed I.A.No.25 of 2008 by order dated 30.09.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite notice, the respondents did not choose to appear. Having regard to the specific plea of the 1st respondent herein that she was in possession of the part of the suit schedule property holding valid title, I am of the opinion that her presence was necessary to decide all the questions involved in the suit effectually and completely. Hence, the discretion exercised by the Court below in allowing the implead petition cannot be held to have suffered from any legal error warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 19.04.2010 KLP