Crl.M.No.M-12424 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-12424 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 3, 2010 Subhash .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.187, dated 3.4.2010, under Sections 406, 420, 506, 341 IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak, District Rohtak. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. This is second application for anticipatory bail on the same facts. Earlier one was got dismissed as withdrawn, after arguing for sometime, vide order dated 23.4.2010. The allegations against petitioner-accused are serious in nature. He was posted as Gunman with one Member of Haryana Staff Selection Commission. He had taken Rs.1,50,000/- from one Shakuntla through complainant Pratibha for getting her daughter-in-law appointed as ANM. However, neither her daughter-in-law was appointed nor money was returned. FIR against petitioner, who is Head Constable, was registered as Crl.M.No.M-12424 of 2010 (O&M) -2- per order of the I.G. Police. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Subhash is dismissed being devoid of any merit. 3.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge