IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10195 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 07, 2011 Amardeep Singh Sandhu …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mohali, on 03.08.2010. Crl. Misc. No. 10195 of 2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that accused – respondent No.2 has not returned the resolution register, therefore, bail granted to the accused is liable to be cancelled. Learned Additional Sessions Judge has recorded in the order dismissing the application for cancellation of bail that there is a long drawn enmity between the parties and accused has not misused the bail. Moreover, Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2011(1) RCR (Criminal) 126, has ruled that irrational and indiscriminate arrest must be avoided. The question as to whether accused is in possession of resolution register is yet to be decided on the basis of evidence. No ground for cancellation of bail is made out. Dismissed. April 07, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2