IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15377 of 2011 1. Kameshwar Pandit, son of late Kali Pandit. 2. Shanti Devi, wife of Sri Kameshwar Pandit. 3. Subodh Kumar, son of Sri Kameshwar Pandit. All residents of Village-Kharka, P.S. Makhdumpur, District-Jehanabad……………………………..…………..……Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Suman Devi, daughter of Bhagwan Pandit, resident of Village- Sobra, P.S. Paraiya, District-Gaya……………………………………………………….Opposite Parties. ----------- 02 19.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband and husband of the complainant are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D. P. Act. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 3 being the husband undertakes to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. In the circumstances, let the petitioner nos. 1 and 2, above named, be released on bail and petitioner no. 3 be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six moths in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period 2 of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1383 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance the petitioner no.3 will take back the complainant to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional bail of the petitioner no. 3 will be confirmed by the learned court below in two eventualities if the matrimonial harmony is restored substantially within six months or the wife deliberately refuses to reside with petitioner no. 3. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)