IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2575 of 2009(F) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- BINDU JOY, W/O. JOY JOSEPH, AGED 37 YEARS, P.D. TEACHER, NELLIKKUZHI PANCHAYTH U.P. SCHOOL, KOTHAMANGLAM BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, ERNAKULAM DIST CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, KAKKANAD, COCHIN -30. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ERNAKLAM DIST CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PERUMBAVOOR MAIN BRANCH, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. THE HEADMASTER, NELLIKKUZHI PANCHAYATH U.P. SCHOOL, KOTHAMANGAM. ADV. SRI. P.V.SURENDRANATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.2575 of 2009-F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner availed a facility from the second respondent. The first respondent is the General Manager of that bank. The petitioner is facing recovery in terms of Section 37 of the KCS Act. Her present endeavour is to seek facility of reduction in the total outstandings and for an opportunity to pay off the entire amount. This is a matter that the petitioner has to take up with the bank. It is not shown that the bank is not looking into any request of the petitioner in that regard. I do not deem it appropriate to merely issue an order directing consideration of Ext.P4. However, the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 states that Ext.P4 will be taken up and considered and a decision issued. WP(C)2575/2009 -: 2 :- Let that be done at the earliest. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/050209