IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 26TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 30361 of 2007(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MURALI MOHANAN NAIR, S/O. JANARDHANAN NAIR, PRASANTHI, VADAKKEVILA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).30361/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P5. A reading of Ext.P5 shows that the intention is to avoid middlemen and it is therefore, that applications were directed to be sent by registered post. On going through the writ petition and the case of the petitioner, I am not satisfied that there is anything objectionable in Ext.P5, in view of the fact that it was issued for the purpose of eliminating middlemen and root out corruption, Ext.P5 is liable to be upheld and I do so. Writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs