IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 339 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- RAMESHCHANDRA POPATLAL PAREKH Versus NARENDRA THAKORLAL DESAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RN SHAH for the Petitioners. MR JB PARDIWALA for Respondent No. 1 RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 13/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.R.N. Shah, learned Advocate for the petitioners, states that, as per the instructions received by him from his clients, the dispute is settled and that the petitioners are already given possession of the suit premises. In that view of the matter, according to him, the revision application has become infructuous. In view of the above statement, this CRA is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief is vacated. No costs. Liberty to apply in case of difficulty. 13th February, 2004 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) **** (apj)