1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16410 of 2011 1 M. GOPINATH 2 M. MARIMUTHU 3 M. JEGATHAMBAL 4 M. DINESH 5 M. NIRMALA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 5 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAJAPALAYAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, CR NO. 13/2007 ... RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C., and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.13 of 2007, on the file of the respondent police and hence, he pray for anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ranked as A1 to A5 and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the first petitioner is the husband and the other petitioners are in-laws of the de-facto complainant. He would further submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, a case has been registered against them and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, stringent condition may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputhur and to file an application for cancellation of non-bailable warrant before the said Court and on filing of such application, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputhur, shall consider and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, on the same day, after hearing the prosecution. sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAJAPALAYAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR. No.43983 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16410 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 RJ/16.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/