IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.R.No.473 of 2009 Date of order : 29.1.2009 Susheela Devi and others ......Petitioner(s) Versus Roopal Sahni and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. JASWANT SINGH,J(ORAL) This revision petition filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is being pressed only on behalf of petitioners No.1 & 5, who are the widow and mother of the deceased Naresh Kumar respectively, praying for setting aside order dated 24.11.2008 passed by the learned MACT, Bhiwani whereby their application for release of the amount of compensation falling to their shares out of the compensation awarded by MACT vide award dated 3.11.2006 has been dismissed. Notice of motion to respondent No.3-United India Insurance Company Ltd. Mrs. Rahish P Dudeja, Advocate, who is present in Court, on the asking of the Court, accepts notice for respondent No.3. It is apparent from the records that a sum of Rs.3,70,000/- was awarded as compensation by the learned MACT with 7 % interest from the date of application till realization of the amount on the petition preferred by the claimants including petitioners No.1 & 5 on account of death of deceased Naresh Kumar. As per ordered apportionment, Rupees one lac was ordered to be released to petitioner No.1-widow and Rs.20,000/- to petitioner No.5 (80 years old mother). C.R.No.473 of 2009 #2# Learned counsel for petitioners No.1 & 5 prays that they are in urgent need of money and since they are major adults, therefore, compensation falling to their shares may be ordered to be released. In view of the ratio of the judgments reported as Nazar Mohammad v. Harbans Singh PLR (2006-2) 818; Mohinder Singh and others v. Kulbir Singh and others PLR (2008-3) 736; H.S. Ahammed Hussain v. Irfan Ahammed 2002(34) RCR (Civil) 563 and General Manager Kerala State Road Transport Corporation Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and others (1994-2) PLR 107, wherein it has been held that in case of urgent and emergency need of the adult claimants, the amount of compensation deposited in the Nationalized Banks can be ordered to be released, learned counsel for respondent No.3-Insurance Company states that she has no objection to such release. Accordingly, learned MACT, Bhiwani is directed to get the amount of compensation falling to the shares of petitioner No.1-widow of the deceased and petitioner No.5-mother of the deceased, released to them at the earliest. Disposed of with the above directions. January 29, 2009 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE