WP(C) 2166/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. D Das, learned counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. BJ Talukda r, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents. In this writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind ia, the petitioner’s basic grievance is that while the petitioner was working as a temporary sub-Inspector of Police, he became physically and mentally sick and after a lapse of about two years, when the petitioner became medically fit to r esume duty, he went to the office of the DIG, Southern Range, Assam Police, Silc har, to rejoin his service, but he was informed by the said office that he had a lready removed from service, though, according to the petitioner, before removin g him from his service, he had not been given any opportunity of showing cause o r hearing. Without entering into the question as to whether the petitioner’s remova l from service is factually and legally sustainable or not, this writ petition i s disposed of with direction to the respondents/authorities concerned, particula rly, the respondent No. 4, namely, Deputy Inspector General, Southern Range, Ass am Police, Silchar, to furnish, to the petitioner, a copy of the order of the pe titioner’s removal from service. The copy of the order, as directed hereinbefore , shall be made available to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of re ceipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is given the liberty to furnish to the respondent No. 4, a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the w rit petition and annexures thereto. If the petitioner is served with a copy of a ny order of his removal from service, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law, as may be permissible.