IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.199 of 1990 WRIT PETITION NO.199 of 1990 WRIT PETITION NO.199 of 1990 Shri Gamaram Shamlal Kanojia...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashra ..Respondent Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO CORAM : F.I. REBELLO CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V. MORE,JJ. R.V. MORE,JJ. R.V. MORE,JJ. DATED : 31ST JANUARY, 2007 DATED : 31ST JANUARY, 2007 DATED : 31ST JANUARY, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Exhibit B to the petition shows that the petitioner was an ordinary resident of State of U.P. The Additional Commissioner rightly held that the petitioner being a migrant is not entitled to the benefits in the State of Maharashtra, even though the community may be notified as O.B.C. in both the States. 2. When the matter is called out none present for the petitioner. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO F.I. REBELLO F.I. REBELLO, J) (R.V. MORE, J) R.V. MORE, J) R.V. MORE, J)