IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1402 of 2010 FAGUNI BAITHA Versus GAYATRI DEVI ----------- 2 13.1.2010 This application has been filed for restoration of Cr.Revision no. 151 of 2009 to its original file which stood rejected not having been complied with the peremptory order dated 23.11.2009 within time granted to the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party no.2 under both process. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was informed by the advocate to supply correct address of the opposite party no.2 but he could not supply the same within time, as such, peremptory order to take steps for fresh service of notice could not be complied with in time. In view of submissions made in the restoration application, the same is allowed and Cr. Revision no. 151 of 2009 is restored to its original file subject to compliance of the order dated 23.11.2009 passed in Cr. Revision no. 151 of 2009. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)