-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6221 OF 2009 Yukta N. Apate. ..Petitioner. Versus Narayan G. Apate. ..Respondent. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Patil for respondent. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : March 25, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The petitioner has filed a petition for dissolution of her marriage with the respondent under section 13(1)(i) and 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956. During the pendency of the hindu marriage petition the respondent filed an application (Exhibit-56) for access to and custody of child – Swaroop. The said application was partly allowed. The custody of the minor child was kept with the petitioner wife and the respondent was granted access to the child in the manner as stated in the impugned order. 2. The petitioner by filing the present writ petition challenges the extent of access given to the respondent. The learned trial Judge while passing the impugned order has considered the relevant circumstances, namely, the age of the respondent’s parents and the pendency of criminal proceedings -: 2 :- initiated by the petitioner against the respondent, etc., Having heard the learned counsel and having perused the reasoning given in the impugned order, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and the same is therefore dismissed. 2. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and in order to see that interest of justice is sub-served, learned trial Judge is directed to expedite the hearing of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 64 of 2008. 3. With these observations writ petition is disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.)