CRM-M-25805 of 2011 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-25805 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.09.2011 Parveen Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.424 dated 2.9.2009 under Sections 379, 403, 408, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 66-C & 66-D of IT Act (Charge-sheeted under Sections 420/120-B, 467/120-B, 468/120-B, 472/120-B of IPC and under Sections 66-C and 66-D of IT Act r/w Section 120-B IPC) at Police Station Central Faridabad. Faridabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is in custody since 26.11.2010. The allegation against him is that he along with other co- accused had used the credit cards and passwords of other persons in order to make payment of insurance premium of the policy which he had taken from M/s Max New York Life Insurance Company. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that he has not taken any refund from the insurance company and neither he is a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Mangal Chand, has conceded that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor any other case is pending against him and has also admitted that he has not discounted the four policies standing in his name in order CRM-M-25805 of 2011 - 2 - to take advantage of the premium having been made from the credit cards of some other persons using their passwords. It is also admitted that there are 24 prosecution witnesses out of whom only 4 witnesses have been examined so far. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on merits, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing two local heavy sureties/bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 JUDGE Vivek