1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4513 OF 2011 Mrs.Suolochana Herwale .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate with Mr.Surel Shah for petitioners Mr.Prashant Kulkarni for respondent No.5 Mr.S.A.Rajeshirke with Prabhakar Jadhav for respondent No.1 Ms.P.S.Cardozo, AGP for respondent/ State CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. RESERVED ON : 4th August 2011 Pronounced on : 6th September 2011. ORAL ORDER: Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard parties. 1] This petitioner is a lady Councillor of the Ichalkaranji Municipal Council. She is also disqualified under section 44(1)(e) of the Municipalities Act. As far as she is concerned, it is stated that property bearing No.20/695 belongs to the 2 spouse of this Councillor and the Collector's finding to the extent relevant reads thus:- COPY PAGES 103-04 ( ) portion 2] For the reasons set out in the judgement delivered in Writ Petition No.4507 of 2011 (Dadasaheb Bhatale Vs. State of Maharashtra) and the controversy being indentical, this petition also succeeds and is allowed. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (B). No costs. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)