IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 8.7.2009. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7718/2009 Shri Sumer Club Sanstha & Anr. Vs. Upper Civil Judge (JD) & Ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri Ajay Gupta, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as per the rule 23 the provisions of order 11 are applicable only to the case where the plaintiff/defendant is a minor and not to others. I have gone through the provisions of rule 23 of order XI and I am unable to accept the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel as, in case the provisions of order 11 were to be applicable only to the plaintiffs and defendants who are minors it would have been specified therein. The provision is an enabling one. In the facts and circumstances of the present case I do not consider a fit case for interference in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS