IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 14031 of 2008. Decided on 24.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Gurdeep Kaur. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. R.D. Kaundal, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending applications, if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 24, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.