HI<»1CQU rort!»tNATTreOARHATBIt*8PUR WrttPrtfion (slNo. 6^1 of26 B Petitioner Resoondents Bi- Ramesh Kunaar ^hu, SOT af Stiri Kanhaiya Lal Sahu, aged about 42 yeare, woridng E» Assistant ©rade, Govemmert MiddteSchool Kallubanjari, Bk»k Churtya, t3istt Rajnanc^aori (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1. State of Chhattlsgarl% througb - the Secretary, Oepartment of School Education, Cteu Katyan Singh Bhswan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) 2 The District Education Offlcer, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarti. 3 Adhlram Sahu, ayesi aboift 43 yeare, Son <rf Shri Sugnv Sahu, ^sistant Tracher, Gowmmeot Prirrary Middle School - Ramtaria, Ostt. Bkxsk Chhuriya, Rajnandgaon <C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 Cff THE CCWSTnUTION 0? INDIA SB: Hon'bte .faisttca Shri Satteh K. Agnilwtrt Present: Mr AbhishekhShama, AdTOcefteforthep^tittoner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocate fbrt()e responitents No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Pawed on this17ndayorApril, 2007) 1. The petitioner has fiiai this pettwn ohalteiiging the tnnrier Gtctor a'ated 11.9.2006. By ytrtue ofthe irterimoTderdated 10.10.2806, pa^edtiy this Court, the petitioner is eontinuing at e original ptaceofposting. 2. Be that as it may. with the passage of tlnie this petitlon hes beoome jnfructuous.asperiodoftnanrferisnrtapplicabtefbreverAtthispeintof time there is no question to ®<aminethe validity of the trander oider. However, the respondents ate at Itberty to pass apprqxiate orcters, keepng in vtewthe pubfc interest and admirtstiative ewgeney, wittiout insisting oncoraplianoeofthe impugned tianstororder. 3. In view of the above, thte petitton stends cBsposed af. No orcler as to 0 tS. ^ SadshK.Agnihotrl Judge