IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1388 OF 2009 Mrs.Kusumben Kantilal Shah & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. M/s.Associated Packaging Industries & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Sanjeev P.Kadam for Petitioners. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 12, 2009. FEBRUARY 12, 2009. FEBRUARY 12, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Once the Petitioners have chosen to take possession of the suit premises, the question of fastening liability of payment of monthly compensation on the tenants does not arise. The goods belonging to the Respondents/tenants were lying in the premises in terms of order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal and not by choice of : 2 : the tenants. Even for that reason, the Court below is right in observing that the tenants cannot be fastened with the liability of payment of monthly compensation. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.