IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1119 of 2007 Date of decision: 02.04.2009 Smt. Santosh and others ...Petitioners Versus Gram Panchayat ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. *** A.N. Jindal, J. Heard. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16.01.2007, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurgaon, dismissing the application for amendment of plaint. The Trial Court in its order has mentioned that the trial of case has already been concluded. It has further been observed that the amendment sought to be introduced is altogether a fresh plea, because it was earlier pleaded in the plaint that they are the co-sharers in the property. Now they want to plead that they had acquired the occupancy rights. Such plea was within the knowledge of the petitioners and now at the fag end of the case, permission to amend the plaint could not be granted. Reliance in this regard could be placed on the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Vidyabai and others Versus Padamlatha and another 2009 (1) RCR ( Civil). Dismissed. April 02 , 2009 ( A.N.Jindal ) amrit Judge