m ^ Cf-'l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONNO, -L(%34 / 2006 PETITIONER v^..--^ ./>v'\-<^/;''"'.••••"' ..;'',W'>L..--"' .•••f^y' . ^•••".i;—>c>^ ^•".c^ ..;'" %<<..••-"" y ^.^r S^a-^ ' 'z'l' :Tarkesh(Siy^ Tbakur ^ S/o Late Gujju Singh Aged about 29 years, R/o- village- Khadi, P.0- Salhewara Tehsil- Chhuiekhadan, Dist- Rajnandgoan (C.G) Versus RE;SPONDENTS v ^i '/ •'» State of Chhattisgarh • Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) Engineer in Chief -; PWD, Department D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (C.G) Superintendent Engineer ^ PWD, Durg Mandal Dist- Durg Sub-Divisional Officer ^ PWD (B&R), Sub-Division Office, Khairagarh (C.G) 1 :'*1 3 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WMT ORDER OF DIRECTION TO DOJUSTICE W THE MATTER. . . ^. ^8^i!!^^j^i^iB»)aw-i iBe' "!- uu--n~.,— ^r HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pefition No. 4836 of 3006 Petitioner Tarkesh Singh Thakuir Versus Respondents State of CTihattisgarh ^. others BB; Hon'ble Mr, Jiistice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri H. S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for tfae petitioaer. Sbri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for the rRspondents. 2. O R DE R ( 5th September, 2006) (^eamerl coiinsel for the petitioner siihmits that thfi pctitioner is the son ofShri Giijjii Singh, who was iporking as Permanent Gangman in tlie officR of tlie nRsponrtfint No. 4/Siib nivisional Offioer, P.W.D. (B&R), Siih-Division OfRce, Khairagarh, District- Rajnanrigaon, rtied in hamess on 15.6.3.n03- The petitioTier, being one ofthe depenrtant-lcgal heirs ofthc deceased filcd an applicatioTi tben-aflter for compassionate .appoinfcnient on 7.3.2005 bcfore the rRSpondcnt No. 4 and the petitionRr again made a representation dated 5.8.2006 biit the said application has not hcRT) considlcT'Rd by tlie n-spoTidcnts. The Statc GovcroiTient is rtirecterl to consider thc case nfthe petitioTicr as per ite own circiilar daterl 2.2.2006 and also in view of the ordcr dated 20.12.3005 nassed by fhis C/inrt m W.P. No. 1322/2003 and otTier connec'tefl mattcrs on its ovpn Tnerit, in accorriaTice with lawr, on siich representetion bcing lited by fhr. petitioner. For the reasons statRd-nbove, the writ petition stanrls disposed of. No ordcr as to cosfs. - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 4. Thakur