IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1090 of 2007 JITENDRA SAH Versus KALAWATI DEVI ----------- 3 26/8/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the light of the statement recorded in I.A. No. 3273 of 2007 the delay in filing of this civil revision application, being almost 97 days, is hereby condoned. After counsel for the petitioner was heard on a considerable length of time and when he having noticed that this Court is not going to interfere with the impugned order, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawn this application. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel for the petitioner would seek liberty to move the court below as the impugned order, according to him, is an exparte order. The law itself provides that if there be exparte order under section 125 of the Cr.P.C, the person concerned will have remedy before that very court. In that view of the matter, nothing is required to be observed by this Court as it is well settled that the provisions of law has to be followed by the court in letter and sprit. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar