IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 801 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 801 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 801 OF 2008 HGI Foundris & ors. .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & anr ...... Respondent. Shri A.H.H. Ponda for the applicant Shri J.P. Yagnik APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 19TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 19TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 19TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. To the extent of prayer clause (b) wherein an order issue process has been challenged, is not pressed and the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition to the extent of the said prayer with liberty to approach the Sessions Judge for calling in question the said order by filing a revision. Hence to the extent of challenge to the issue process order, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition. Needless to mention that all contentions raised in this petition are left open to be agitated in the revision, which the petiitoner proposes to file before the revisional court. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioners and the same be stayed for sometime so as to enable the petitioner to appear before the trial court and move appropriate application. The said prayer is reasonable and hence the bailable warrant issued against the petitioner/applicant shall remain stayed for a period of four weeks from today. ...