1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 860/2008 (Lakhama Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 26/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Shambhoo Singh for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is 70 years of age and is infirm person and was taken by other co-accused on the pretext to get some papers prepared for old age pension and got the thumb impression and affixed his photographs. The petitioner is an illiterate person. Subsequently, it revealed that the document on which the photographs were affixed and thumb impressions were taken was said to be an agreement to sale. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Lakhama S/o Pema be 2 released on bail in FIR No. 33/2008 P.S. Bhupalpura, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP