C.W.P. No. 20012 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20012 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 18.10.2011 Kulwant Singh ..........Petitioner Versus Punjab State Electricity Board & Ors. ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdev Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. P.K. Garg, Advocate for respondent No.7. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The claim of the petitioner is for issuing directions to the respondents to grant deemed date promotion to him from the date his junior has been promoted. After issuing notice of motion, replies have been filed on behalf of all the respondents and the same are on record. Learned counsel for respondent No.7 submits that the benefit given to respondent No. 7 has already been withdrawn and order of granting promotion has been cancelled. Learned counsel for respondent No. 7 further submits that the claim of the petitioner is only at par with the answering respondent and in view of the withdrawal of claim of respondent No.7, the present petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for C.W.P. No. 20012 of 2009 (2) respondent No.7 that since the benefit given to respondent No. 7 has already been cancelled and the petitioner cannot claim parity at par with respondent No.7, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed accordingly. October 18, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE .