AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4854 OF 1996 Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Dilip Bodake for the petitioner. Ms. P.S. Cardozo, A.G.P. for the State. Mr. T.Bhargude i/b Mr. A.V. Anturkar for respondent 3. Ms. Beena Menon for respondent 4. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2006. P.C.:- We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The reliefs prayed by the petitioner in this petition pertain to the year 1996-97. In view of this, in our opinion, the petition has become infructuous. Ms. Menon the learned counsel for respondent 4 states that since 1996, respondent 4 - the All India Council for Technical Education had been granting approval to the petitioner-institution. She states that even for the current year, 2006-07, 120 seats have been granted for conducting the M.B.A. AJN 2 course. We record this statement. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]