CWP No. 1120 of 2008 30.10.2008 Present: Mr. Javed Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents 1 to 3 and 5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been transferred by an order dated 30.6.2008 in light of Section 86 (2) of the H.P. Police Act, 2007 after serving the place of posting for almost eight years. However, after his due to attain the age of superannuation on 31.3.2009 and desirous to settle down after retirement at Chamba, it has also been informed that the petitioner has already moved his papers regarding pension and has also made a representation addressed to the Director General of Police on 18.9.2008, which is still pending. The learned Advocate General has very fairly brought to our notice that no such representation can be filed by the petitioner before the Director General of Police but in the light of Section 107 of the H.P. Police Act, 2007, the representation lies before the D.I.G. In the circumstances, it will be open to the Director General of Police to transfer his representation to the D.I.G.. It is further provided that the petitioner shall also supply a copy of his representation addressed to the Director General of Police for deciding the same to the D.I.G. along with certified copy of this order, who shall decide the same sympathetically in accordance with law and keeping in mind the facts mentioned hereinabove. We have been informed on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been allowed to work and is being paid his salary at Chamba. In these circumstances, till the representation of the petitioner is decided by the D.I.G., the parties shall maintain status quo. With these observations, with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of. CMP No. 1701 of 2008: Infructuous. Certified copy “Dasti” within 48 hours. (Jagdish Bhalla), CJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. October 30, 2008. (cr)