1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR W.P.NO.2553 of 2010 Anil Ramchandra Date ..vs.. Magaswargiya Jankalyan Shikshan Sanstha and ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 18, 2010. Heard Mr.I.N.Choudhari, learned counsel for the petitioners. School Tribunal has fond that the appointment of the petitioner was not legal and valid. Contention of Advocate Choudhari for the petitioner is that one employee by name Manik Dongarwar was terminated and in his place the petitioner came to be appointed. However, mala fidely after three to four months, Manik Dongorwar was again permitted to join and work and hence the petitioner was not shown in sanctioned strength and his case was not forwarded for approval. It is apparent that there was no advertisement and therefore, the petitioner did not enter the service in accordance with law. Hence, In view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this court reported in 2007(6) Mh.L.J.667 (Priyadarshini Education Trust and ors. ..vs.. Ratis (Rafia) Bano d/o Ab.Rasheed and ors), it is apparent that the petitioner had no right to claim for the post. Therefore, no case is made out for warranting interference. Writ petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE chute