THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 1820 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad in I.A.No. 185 of 2009 in R.C.No. 74 of 2008, dated 3.3.2010. Facts in brief are that: Respondent herein is the petitioner, who filed R.C.No. 74 of 2008 against the petitioners herein, who were residing in the petition schedule premises. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the learned trial Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. Since the respondents were absent, the learned trial Court has set them exparte on 28.1.2008. The respondents have filed I.A.No. 185 of 2009 under Section 5 of Limitation Act read with Section 151 of C.P.C. seeking to condone the delay of 264 days in filing the petition for setting aside the exparte order dated 28.1.2008 passed in the main R.C. After hearing both the parties, the learned trial Court has dismissed the said I.A. Aggrieved by the said order, the defeated respondents have preferred the present revision petition. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and perused the order under revision. As can be seen from the order under revision though the sons of the respondents have received the notice, they have stated that they have not received any notice. In view of the facts and circumstances, the plea taken by the respondents is not fair and there is no case in favour of the respondents to condone the delay of 264 days in filing the petition for setting aside the exparte orders. Under these circumstances, I do not find any merits in the revision petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 26.4.2010 CHV