IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2010 / 7TH ASHADHA 1932 LA.App..No. 873 of 2007() ------------------------- LAR.117/2000 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... APPELLANT(S): SUPPL.2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, PAYYANNUR, MUNICIPALITY, PAYYANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.K.T.POULOSE (KORATTY) RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS,SUPPL.PETITIONERS AND 1ST RESPONDENT --------------- 1. M.KUNHASSI, W/O.ABBAS HAJI, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. K.P.KHADEEJA, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O.MULLANTAKATH HAMSAKUNHI, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. SAFOORA, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.MULLANTAKATH HAMSAKUNHI, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. MUHAMMAD SAFFIYAN, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.MULLANTAKATH HAMSAKUNHI, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. MUHAMMAD SUFFIYAN, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.MULLANTAKATH HAMSAKUNHI, REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN K.P.KHADEEJA, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. SUFFAIDA, AGED 13 YEARS, D/O.MULLANTAKATH HAMSAKUNHI, REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN K.P.KHADEEJA, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 7. MUHAMMAD SUHAYIN, AGED 9 YEARS, S/O.MULLANTAKATH HAMSAKUNHI, REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN K.P.KHADEEJA, RESIDING AT KOVVAPPURAM, KUNHIMANGALAM (PO), KANNUR DISTRICT. 8. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR), THALASSERY. ADV. SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR FOR R1 TO 7 SRI.GEEN T.MATHEW FOR R1 TO 7 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN FOR R8 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 873 OF 2007 ------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. This is an appeal by the requisitioning authority Payyannur Municipality. Our attention is drawn to the common judgment of this Court in L.A.A. No.1104/2007 series. We are of the view that for the various reasons stated in that common judgment, there is no justification for entertaining this appeal. According to us, the appellant Municipality cannot have any legitimate grievance about refixation of market value done under the impugned judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed, however without any order as to costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE dpk