IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Crim.Revision Application No. 399 of 2006 Shri Jayant Madhukar Amrutkar ..Petitioner vs. Sou.Gayatri Jayant Amrutkar ..Respondent. Miss P.P.Tendulkar for petitioner. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & Smt.NISHITA MAHTRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MAHTRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MAHTRE JJ. 7th February, 2007 7th February, 2007 7th February, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. We have perused the order. The revision petitioner is already working in U.S.A. It was for him to produce his earnings and in absence of that the Trial Court has applied proper test for ascertaining the earnings of a person and fixed the quantum of maintenance. Rule of best evidence is not followed by the revision petitioner. The advantage of his own wrongs cannot be permitted to him. Revision petition is without any merit. It is hereby rejected. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)