IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12079 of 2011 LUXMAN GOSWAMI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Although the petitioner is brother-in-law of the deceased but admittedly, after the alleged occurrence, the fardbeyan of the deceased was recorded and in the aforesaid fardbeyan, she has specifically stated that this petitioner lit fire on her body. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that initially, the case was registered under sections-498A, 341, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code but after one month of the alleged occurrence, when the deceased died, the case was converted into section-302 of the Indian Penal Code. It is also pointed out by him that alleged occurrence took place on 23.06.2008 at about 6.30 a.m. and just after two hours of the alleged occurrence, the fardbeyan of the deceased was recorded, particularly in the condition when she was found burnt about 90 percent, so it was not possible for her to state all the happenings in such a systematic way but I am not at all convinced with the above- said submission of the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in 2 connection with Shahkund P.S. Case No. 107 of 2008 stands rejected. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)