... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.778 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.162 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr S.J. Rairkar for the Applicants. Mr N.P. Deshpande for Respondent Nos.1 to 7. Mr G.S. Godbole for Respondent Nos.8 to 13. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MAY 03, 2006. : MAY 03, 2006. : MAY 03, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. Heard the Advocates appearing on behalf of parties. This is an Application under Order 32 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The consent terms duly signed by the Applicant Nos.1 to 4 and all the Respondents are annexed to the Application. The Applicant No.5 is a minor. The Applicant No.1 is the mother and natural guardian of the minor. Original certificate dated 29th April, 2006 issued by Shri Subhash B. Pawar, Advocate is taken on record and same is marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the averments ... 2 ... made in the Application and in view of the various clauses incorporated in the consent terms I am satisfied that the leave deserves to be granted under Order 32 Rule 7 of the said Code to enter into compromise on behalf of the Applicant No.5. Affidavit of the Applicant No.1 is also on record. Hence, the Application is allowed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE