IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1618 of 2010() ----------------------------- CMP.269/2010 of J.M.F.C.-II,KOTTARAKKARA CRIME NO. 82 OF 2010 OF KADACKAL POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 --------------------- MUHAMADU KUNJU, S/O.HUSSAIN RAWTHER, VURUPPEL PUTHEN VEEDU, PATHANAMTHITTA MUNICIPALITY, WARD NO.22, VALLAMCHUZHY, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADACKAL POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M. KAMMAPPU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * B.A. NO. 1618 OF 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 6th day of April, 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 82 of 2010 of Kadackal Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 489 (B) and 489 (C) read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 16-1-2010 and he petitioner was arrested on the same day. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)