1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5142/2008 (Ranjan S. Misal and others vs. Manda D. Athode and others) CORAM : B.P.Dhamadhikari, J. DATE : 4 th DECEMBER, 2008 Heard Advocate Kulkarni, for the petitioners. By order dated 12.9.2008, after considering the claim of the petitioner as legal heir and for share in the property, the S.D.O. advised petitioner to file civil suit. He considered the objection received further and on 15..9.2008 permitted the sale-purchase transaction by imposing certain conditions as per provisions of Section 57 r/w Rule 31 of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958. Advocate Kulkarni argues that petitioner has filed petition before Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur and as the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal is not functioning, the said order needs to be stayed, because, otherwise the land would be sold. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no. 6 points out that nature of dispute is unrelated to Tenancy Act and order of S.D.O. needs no interference. 2 During hearing, it has been brought to my notice that Regular Civil Suit No. 97/2008 was already filed by present petitioners on 20th September, 2008 and they have also moved an application for grant of temporary injunction in the matter. It is, therefore, apparent that the competent forum has already been approached by the petitioners. No case is, therefore, made out warranting interference in the writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rvjalit