IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1839 of 2009 YOGENDRA SAHANI & ANR Versus BHOLA MAHTO & ORS ----------- 2. 19.8.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect as pointed out by the office in the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 and 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that due to wrong report by the Advocate’s clerk that all the four defects had been removed within the peremptory time granted by order dated 5.5.2008 of this Court, no steps were taken within time for removal of defect No.1. It is further stated that defect No.1 has also been removed by filing the certified copy of the decree on 20.5.2009. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case the time for compliance of the peremptory order is extended to 20.5.2009. Second Appeal No.71 of 2006 shall, accordingly, stand restored to its original file. The present application is, thus, allowed. VPS (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)