IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1703 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22972/2008 Dated 30/07/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------------- P. VIJAYA MOHANAN NAIR, S/O. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, AGED 58 YEARS, PARAMESWARA VILASAM, ERATHAVOOR.P.O, RUSSALPURAM, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- T.P. SENKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SC SRI. K. PRABHAKARAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont. Case (C) No.1703 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT The writ petition was disposed of directing the respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 in accordance with law and to pay the amount as per the decision within two months from the date of the decision. Annexure III appears to be the decision taken. No doubt learned counsel for the petitioner would have a complaint that it is not a speaking order and it is not an order taken in accordance with law. I think that this is not a matter to be gone into in contempt proceedings. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Annexure III, the contempt of court case is closed. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb