IIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 3470 ot'2006 AMBIKA COAL DEPOT; Through: its Proprietor, Mafaesh Agrawal, S/o. K.L.AgrawaI, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) VERSUS 1. Soufh Eastem CoalSeIds Limited. Tln-oueh: its Cliairmaii-cum-Maiiagiiig Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG) 2. Oeneral Maiager, Vislirainpur CoSliery, District Surguja (CG) 3. The Chief General Maiiager (S&M) SECL, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) 4. Ai'ea Sales Managct', SECL, Vislirampur Ai'ea, Tahsil Vishrampur, DistrictSurguja (CG) B.'RIT PETITION UNUER ARTICLE 226/227 OF Ttffi CONSTTrUTION OF WDIA Present: SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Siiri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the pstitioner. Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate forthe respondents. ER (Passed or, 26U' day of October, 2007) 1. Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents are not permitting the petitioner to lift the entire coal as per the delivery order dated 22.04.2006. Leamed counsel turther submits that the entire amount for the coal has been paid but the respondents. without affbrdins anv opDOrtunitv of heanng or without passing any order, are preventina the petitioner from liftmg the remaining coal. Leamed counsel turther submits that the petitioner faas made representations dated 20.05.2006 (Annexure P/4) and 01.06.2006 fAnnexure P/5) which remain undecided till date. The petitioner is sufferins on account ofarbitrary action ofthe respondents. 2. Shri Koshv. leamed counsel appearias respoadents submits that there are some substantial reasons for not permittine the petitioner to lift the remaming coal. 3. Be fhat as it mav. Tlie respondents are directed to consider the representations dated 20.05.2006 (Aimexure P/4) and 01.06.2006 (Annexure P/5) after affbrding an opportimity of hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate ordere in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofthree weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. In view ofthe foregoine. this petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^.