..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3910 OF 2008 Mr.Firoze Hamza Mithiborwala and 3 Ors. ..Applicants. Versus Shabana Nisar Warne and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Osman Chishty, Adv. i/b. Parvez Ubharay, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.Ankit Bhatt, Adv. i/b. M/s. Law Point, for respondent No.1. Mr.S.R.Shinde Adv. for respondent No.2-State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th November, 2008. DATED : 11th November, 2008. DATED : 11th November, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants, the learned Advocate for the respondent - orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of FIR lodged by the respondent No.1 against them. The respondent No.1 is the wife of petitioner No.1. The case pertains to FIR No.477 of 2008 of Powai police station and it is under Sections 498-A, 323, 506, 504 ..(2).. read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned Advocate for the respondent - orig.complainant has stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the parties have entered into consent terms. The said consent terms are annexed at Exh.B to the Application. 4. In view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C.277 2003(3) S.C.277 2003(3) S.C.277, the prayer of the applicant can be considered. Hence, FIR No.477 of 2008 of Powai police station is quashed. In view of the settlement, the present application is disposed of in terms of consent terms. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)