1 Cri.A.973.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 973 OF 2011 [ The Aurangabad Peoples Co-Op. Bank Ltd. Vs. Jaising Bhavsingh Jadhav] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.V.B.Kale,Advocate for Applicant. Shri.Y.S.Choudhari,Advocate holding for Shri.V.M.Kagne,Advocate for respondent. .... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 152 days, caused in filing accompanying Criminal application seeking leave to file an Appeal. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the application bears no substance and same is devoid of merits and deserves to be dismissed. 2 Cri.A.973.11 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 4. Considering the contents of the application and rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, & for the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause [B] thereof; and delay of 152 days caused in filing accompanying Criminal application seeking leave to file an Appeal stands condoned and present application is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.] MTK 3 Cri.A.973.11