1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CAZ No.811/2011 in LPA No.283/2011 in WP No. 149/2011 Sudam Tukaram Thakare Vs. Jairaj Ladharam Tehelramani and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ms. Kirti Satpute, Advocate for the applicant/respondent no.1 to 5. Mr. U. A. Gosavi, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM :B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 25/11/2011. Heard respective counsel. Perused the order dated 11.11.2011. The last sentence at page no.2 of the order, which reads “As we find no prejudice would be caused to the present appellant, we are inclined to remand the matter to the learned Single Judge keeping all the contentions open raised by Mr. Gosavi. We, therefore, dispose of the present LPA.” is corrected to read as, “As we find no prejudice would be caused to the present appellant, we are not inclined to remand the matter to the learned Single Judge. Keeping all the contentions open raised by Mr. Gosavi we, therefore, dispose of the present LPA.” The order shall be read accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.