IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5118 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.09.2009 M/s Current Indian Statutes .....Petitioner versus M/s Vrindavan Packers and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.L.M.Suri, petitioner in-person. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction to the Rent Controller, Chandigarh to expeditiously decide the eviction petition filed against the respondent-tenants. It is averred that even after availing three opportunities, the respondents have so far led no evidence and are seeking adjournments on one pretext or the other. Reference has been made to the zimini orders passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh from time to time. Having heard the petitioner at some length and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and/or the allegations C.R. No.5118 of 2009 (O&M) 2 made against the respondents, however, keeping in view the fact that like ever litigant, the petitioner too is entitled to speedy disposal of its eviction application, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Rent Controller, Chandigarh to exelerate the hearings and avoid unwanted adjournments as well as to grant limited but reasonable opportunities to the parties to lead their respective evidence and conclude the proceedings at the earliest, preferably within a period of six months. Disposed of. Dasti. 08-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE