IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 767 of 2008 Jagdish Chandra Joshi & others. … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. … Respondents Mr. Tumul Nailwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent no. 1. None for respondent no.2. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Tumul Nailwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent no. 1. None for respondent no.2. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against all the petitioners before the circle officer concerned on 19.03.2009 and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 25.02.2009 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 23.03.2009 V.K.