IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 RP.No. 1097 of 2007(K) AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.29930/2007 Dated 11/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER: M.KRISHNAN, PROPRIETOR, M.C.K.BLOCK INDUSTRIES, VENKULAM, KARODE P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANATHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.HARIKUMAR SRI.HARIKUMAR.S. RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER (ADVANCES) STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REGION II, ZONAL OFFICE, K.S.H.B.BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, POZHIYOOR BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. R.S. KALKURA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC , J ========================== R.P. No. 1097/2007 in W.P.(C). NO. 29930 OF 2007 ========================== Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007. ORDER The only additional request that the petitioner now makes is for a direction to the respondents to consider Exts.P6 and P7. The request now sought for is not objectionable. Therefore, I dispose of the review petition directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider Exts.P6 and P7. If these representations have been reviewed and are pending, I clarify that this direction is issued without in any way disturbing the directions for payment that are incorporated in the judgment. Needless to say that if in terms of the judgment any payment made is found to be ultimately in excess of the amounts that are actually due, necessary adjustments will be made. The review petition is disposed of accordingly. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rv