IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2009 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1370 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.53/2009 OF KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION CMP.1461/2009 of J.M.F.C., KODUNGALLUR .................... PETITONERS/ACCUSED: --------------------------------------- 1. MUHAMMED SANEER @ SANEER, S/O.SAHALU, KIZHAKKEVEETIL, EDAVANAKKAD, VYPPIN, NOW RESIDING AT MANJANAPPALLY, ERIYAD. 2. SHAJI @ KODALI SHAJI, S/O.SALEEM, MANAPURATH HOUSE, MACHAMTHURUTH, VADAKKEKARA, PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MUJEEB RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------ THE C.I. OF POLICE, KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ========================= Bail Application No.1370 of 2009 ============================ Dated, this the 1st day of April, 2009 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.A3 and A6 in Crime No.53 of 2009 of Kodungallur Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 395 IPC seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 10.2.09. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj