1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1098 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1353 OF 2010 Bhagwat P. Pawar ...Appellant. v. The M.C.G.M. ...Respondent. Mr.Nagendra B. Shukla i/by B.P.Shukla, advs., for the Appellant. Smt.K.K.Soran, adv. for the respondent/MCGM. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 27th September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, who is the original plaintiff. He filed Long Cause Suit No.1936 of 2010 claiming perpetual injunction restraining the Municipal Corporation from removing its structure described in the plaint admesuring 6 ' x 10 ' made of patra sheet wall and A.C. sheet roofs situated at Survey No. 1467, Ambedkar Road, Near Maya Mahal Building, Khar (West), Mumbai-400 052. He also filed notice of motion no.2282 of 2010 seeking interim relief of the said nature. The trial Court refused ad- interim relief while the notice of motion is still pending. The trial Court noted that the property described in the plaint is different from the 2 address of the plaintiff given in the identity card issued by the Election Commission. On perusal of the description given by the plaintiff and the address given in the identity card given by the Election Commission, I am unable to find any fault with impugned order, therefore, I see no reason to interfere at this stage particularly when the notice of motion is pending. 2 Therefore, the appeal and the application stand dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1099 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1354 OF 2010 Jyotsana B. Pawar ...Appellant. v. The M.C.G.M. ...Respondent. Mr.Nagendra B. Shukla i/by B.P.Shukla, advs., for the Appellant. Smt.K.K.Soran, adv. for the respondent/MCGM. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 27th September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, who is the original plaintiff. He filed Long Cause Suit No.1937 of 2010 claiming perpetual injunction restraining the Municipal Corporation from removing its structure described in the plaint admesuring 6 ' x 10 ' made of patra sheet wall and A.C. sheet roofs situated at Survey No. 1467, Ambedkar Road, Near Maya Mahal Building, Khar (West), Mumbai-400 052. He also filed notice of motion no.2281 of 2010 seeking interim relief of the said nature. The trial Court refused ad- interim relief while the notice of motion is still pending. The trial Court noted that the property described in the plaint is different from the 4 address of the plaintiff given in the identity card issued by the Election Commission. On perusal of the description given by the plaintiff and the address given in the identity card given by the Election Commission, I am unable to find any fault with impugned order, therefore, I see no reason to interfere at this stage particularly when the notice of motion is pending. 2 Therefore, the appeal and the application stand dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)