1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5249/2010 ( Vishnu Taur Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. HI Pathan Adv. for Applicant/s; Mr. NB Patil APP for State. Mr.MS Patil, Adv. For Resp.Nos. 2 & 3; Mr. AS More, Adv. For Resp.Nos. 4 to 6. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 28 th April, 2011. 1) Heard finally. 2) The complainant feels aggrieved by his threat perception recorded by the accused/applicants after they are released on bail. 3) Mr.Pathan, by reading the application, has informed that son-in-law and other relations, i.e. the accused, are threatening him to eliminate, as the applicant has re-opened the issue of death of his daughter – Rukhminibai against respondent Vitthal and his relations. – 4) Reading the order of release of the respondents/accused, it is indicative, scrupulously, the respondents have recorded their attendance on Sunday and no overt act so far is reported to the police. 5) Threat purportedly given while the complainant was at Paranda, though may not be doubted, however, care can be taken to protect interest of the complainant. Hence order. 6) The respondents/accused shall not enter village Arangaon, Tq. Paranda, where the complainant and the witnesses reside, for a period of six months from today. 7) Criminal Application is partly allowed in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/