THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4323 of 2009 DATE: 09.10.2009 Between: Vasamsetti Satyanarayan ……Petitioner Mattaparti Naga Rajarao and two others ……Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Pappu Srinivasa Rao Counsel for the Respondents: N.A. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER: The petitioner/plaintiff filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order, dated 19.08.2009 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Amalapuram in I.A.No.35 of 2009 in O.S.No.124 of 2008. The petitioner/plaintiff filed the above suit for permanent injunction. On filing written statement by the respondents/defendants in the said suit, the petitioner filed the present Interlocutory Application seeking permission of the Court to permit him to file his rejoinder. The Court below dismissed the said I.A since the rejoinder has not been filed along with the application. Further, in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the petitioner no where stated about the new aspects, which were stated by the respondents/defendants in their written statement and which have to be clarified by him in his rejoinder, except stating bald averment that in the written statement the defendants raised all false and untenable allegations against him with a view to deprive him his just rights in managing the temple constructed by his forefathers in their own site. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the entire material available on record, I am of opinion that the discretion exercised by the Court below dismissing the I.A does not warrant interference by this Court. However, it is always open for the petitioner to move the Court below with necessary application along with the rejoinder. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 09.10.2009 va