IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2008 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36159 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.KRISHNAKUMARI, W/O.M.S. MOHANAN, AGED 48 YEARS, MULLAKKAL HOUSE, THAZHATHUVADAKARA P.O., KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY, 3. THE SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD NANDANKODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. M.SURESH, S/O. MADHAVAN NAIR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MANACKAL PURAYIDAM HOUSE, EDAYIRAKKAPPUZHA P.O., KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER, SC, TDB FOR R3 SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 36159 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as an HSA (Maths) under the 3rd respondent. By Ext.P3, she was transferred to Kangazha and the 4th respondent was transferred to Thiruvalla. The 2nd respondent rejected approval by Ext.P4, and Ext.P5 revision filed by the petitioner is pending before the 1st respondent. In the meanwhile, by Ext.P6, the 3rd respondent cancelled Ext.P3. A revision filed against Ext.P6 ended in its rejection. Against that order also, the petitioner has filed Ext.P10 revision before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition, the petitioner complains about the delay in the disposal of Exts.P5 & P10 revisions. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the aforesaid revisions are pending, there is no reason why orders shall not be passed with notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 & 4. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that Exts.P5 & P10 revisions shall be disposed of by the 1st respondent with notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 & 4 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg