IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11143 of 2007 Between: 1. K.Prabhakar S/o.K.Purushotham R/o.Ieeja Post, Gadwal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2. H.Kistanna S/o.H.Ayyanna R/o.Amarvai Post, Maldakal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 3. M.Bhaskar S/o.M.Rama Swamy R/o.Chikkepally, Pangal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. A.P. Transco, rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, vidyut Soudha, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2. A.P. Central Power Distribution Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, APCPDCL, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to Interview the petitioners for the post of Junior Line Men in the 2nd respondent Corporation scheduled to be held on 02.06.2007, 04.06.2007 or any other subsequent date and consider their cases on preferential basis by declaring the action of the respondent in not considering their cases and in not calling the petitioners for Interview as illegal and arbitrary and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.K.SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.R.BALARAMI REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.11143 of 2007 ORDER: Present writ petition has been instituted seeking directions to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner for the post of Junior Lineman whiling filling up the said posts in the selection process undertaken on 02-06-2007 or on any other subsequent date. An interim direction was passed by this Court on 30-05-2007, directing the respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners also provided they satisfy the eligibility criteria and accordingly, the cases of the writ petitioner were considered, but however, they were found to be not satisfying the eligibility criteria for appointment as Junior Lineman. Orders to that effect have already been communicated. The petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the orders passed by the respondents rejecting their candidature, they may institute separate proceedings. Leaving such an opportunity to the writ petitioners to pursue their remedies to agitate about the orders passed by the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of, as the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further. No costs. -------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 4th June 2009 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}