IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR /‘ w.P.(s.1No. 765 9 /2o1o f r PETITIONER Jiwan Lal Futan S/ o Bhulan Lal Aged about 51 years R/o Near Water Tank Mishra Wada, New Khamtarai School, Khamtrai, Post Office W.R.S. Colony, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS / / RESPONDENTS : l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary School Education Department D .K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector 85 District Election Officer Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) f 3. The District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) /. 4. The Block Education Officer, Dharsiwa, District Raipur (C.G.) K, Government Higher Secondary ISc'hool Vaigan Repair Shop Colony’ Balak Block Dharsiwa, 5. The Principal, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT‘PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. . f " HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITSON (S) NO. 7659 OF 2010 Petitioner Jiwan Lal Futan Versus Resnondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihatri, J.) Present :- Shri Vivek Rathod, Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ V Shri A.V.Shr§dhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 63rd day of January, 2G1 1) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation on 6.4.2010 (Annexure P-6) to the District Education Officer} Raipur, for payment of his salary, which was due for the last 6 months. Pursuant to the said representation, the District Education Officer, Raipur, vide communication dated 15.4.2010 (Annexure P—8) sought for certain clarification from the petitioner, The petitioner has responded to the letter dated 15.4.2010 on 23.4.2010 (Annexure P-9). it appears that no order has been P passed thereafter by the District Education Officer. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is continuously working on his post without any payment. 3. Be that as it may, since no decision has been taken on the representation of the petitioner and subsequent communication made between the District Education Officer and the petitioner, it would be expedient to direct/thewDistifiot Education Officer to consider all the aspects of the matter as afore-stated and pass an order in accordance with iaw. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to’the Distric Education Officer to consider and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, on its own merit, preferably within a period of 6 weeks. . ,1. Sd/- . M, ‘ i Satish K. Agnihotrt? aShOK " i Judge i t