IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3151 of 2007 1. MINU KUMARI DAUGHTER OF ARJUN SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-VIDYUT COLONY, WEST KARYANAND NAGAR, LAKHISARAI, P.S. AND DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. 2. SHAILESH KUAMR SHARMA, SON OF KAPILDEO SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NOMA, P.S. HALSI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 3. RAJEEV KANT SHARMA, SON OF SRI RAMAKANT SHRMA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- KARYANAND NAGAR, P.S. AND DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 4. SUNIL KUMAR, SON OF SRI YOGENDRA MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHARMRAY CHAK, P.S. AND DISTRICT LAKHISRAI 5. PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI RAMANAND SINGH, JAY NAGAR, LAL PAHARI, WARD NO.24, P.S. AND DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 6. RABINDRA SHARMA, SON OF SRI RAM SAGAR SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMCHANDRAPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 7. SATISH KUMAR, SON OF SRI BHAGIRATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HASANPUR, P.S. AND DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 8. MAHESH KUMAR, SON OF LATE SIDHO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LOLLIPUR, P.S. PIPARIA, DISTRICT LAKHSARAI 9. SANJAY KUMAR, SON OF LATE DAROGA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TILAKPUR, P.S. CHANAN, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 10.CHANDRAMAULI KUMAR, SON OF SRI CHHOTELAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ALINAGAR, P.S. SURYAGARHA, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI 11. ANIL PRASAD SINGH, SON OF SRI SHEO NANDAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANO, P.S. SURYAGARH, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI……………………………………… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA- ANJANI KUMAR SINGH 2. THE DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA – KAMLESHWAR PD. SINGH 3. THE DIRECTOR (PRIMARY EDUCATION) HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT AT PATNA- ASHOK KUMAR SINGH 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, LAKHISARAI – KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, LAKHISARAI- DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH - 2 - 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, JAMUI- BASHISTH NARAYAN JHA 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, LAKHISARAI- SANJEEV KUMAR 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SURYA GARHA – RAMESHWAR PADNEY 9. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICEER, HALSI, LAKHISARAI- ARJUN PASWAN 10.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHAMAN, LAKHISARAI- PRABHU DAS … CONTEMNOR-OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3. 03.02.2009 It is an admitted position now that representation which was filed by the petitioners pursuant to the order dated 8.5.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12460 of 2006, did not contain the necessary details, as required by this Court. Therefore, no fault can be found with the rejection of the said representation of the petitioners by the District Superintendent of Education, Lakhisarai which he has done by Annexure-C to the show cause after receiving guidelines from the Human Resources Development Department. As such, no case of contempt is made out in the matter. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. However, the petitioners are given liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned with all necessary details for reconsideration of their cases. If such representation is filed, - 3 - the authority concerned shall pass order on the same in accordance with law within three months from the date of filing of the representation. It is made clear that any order passed on the representation, if adverse to the petitioners, shall only be a new cause of action to the petitioners. B.T. (J.N.Singh, J.)