^ IN THE HON'BLE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. lr» WRIT PETITIONNO.aS^"-/2006. PETITIONER J. P. Rajesh Kumar S/o Late Shri. D.Johnson Aged around 33 years, Unemployed Residing at: CB- 7, Room No. J, CampNo. 1, SupelaPost BHILAI-490001 Tehsil and Dist.: Durg (CG). • VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ^'.-•'' - ..••'' i-Y.A'fr0.--" ^•"^?-" ^^ ,/c^"4^' ^1:^ /•••" ^y M// ^^..^^^'-^ ^-t ^'/ "'s'v' '^s-s'f' .^~y j,^ ' ntt-a • ^.- ^^•'^^ i»^ S3'-',^"'^''/"' 1. STEELAUTHORITYOFINDIALTD, Through : Its Chairman, Steel Authority oflndia Ltd. Lodhi Road, Ispat Bhawan, NEW DELHI-110011. 2. ^ BHILAI STEEL PLANT, Through : Its Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BmLAl - 490001 District: Durg (CG). 3. The Senior Executive, - (Personnel - Recmitment) Bhilai Steel Plant, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE JSSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAIVIUS ETC, XI-HC-22 f^qi'STl^W ^•41^ WW^ ^y 'yss ^wv\^, ^rftwre, RTiroy 3ii^?r ira^ ^...w.^.^.^3^^> sn^r TCTWHf^? 8-5-2006 Heard Shri B.P-Rao,| By the "nstant pi r'espondent No.3 be direct^d con-ipGSSionGte ground. The caae of the pet empioyee of 1+ig Bhilai S^ icpunsei for -ttie petitioner. rtition, the pe+itloner has praysd that •^d +o consicier' the case of •t+ie petitioner" on problem csnd wcs declcred ;ompassiortate flep Services. Bhiloi Stcel Pianft doted 16.2.1994 his servje^s if wvy smploye®who was jofa; the aependent famil^ suilnbie job on compassio^o submittsd an asislication oetitioner died on 17.8.1994 No.3 for verifisntion of hil Acsordingiy, the petition^r' i»idhis tssTimonials we"s &assed anv order. Leamed eounsel circun'stances, responden^ •ttse petitioner for compass| ^N^f^ i:n^tf ^ 'f?r3t ^i<^i< ^T srpgti sn^i tioner 13 that the petitioner's father was an ^eel-Plant, he was ^uffering from kidney jpermensnt unfiT by The birector of ,V. &. 1-1 on 22.12.1993. Subsequentiy, vide or'der fcs were terminated. As oer ths'settiement leeloired permanent medteall^ unfit for the member is en+itied TO be appointed on d |"ound. Tne fsTher of the petitioner' bp +he Dstitioner. However. father of the ^4. Tne petitioner was called by respondenf sducationai and othsr rslevsant dosMmsnts. appeared befor-e the concapned officer li'erified. However, rssGondent No.3 has ne* f^sr Itie petitionet* submitted tiiat m the No.3 be directed to consider The case of ionate appointmsnt. ___-— XI-HC-22 3Ilt?C%I f?;ii3i'3n^r w:iR;tritti iarve T5? -.qraRra, •B^ftwTe, •i^?irey .n 3'i^r TCirwHfe -^- Proyer" made by learne^ and raasomble. Therefore, re^p application of +hs peti+'oner ^s' accordance wjin t4ie poii^y sompcssionaTe appoin*menT witf Wi1+i the direction aforda Consequently, I.A. No.41 Parties are entitied for qmfeNN'qTtRif •? fecA ifaf^R: ^; •3if:?n an^i counsei for ths pstitioner is just, fwr i^pondent No.3 is direeted to .decide the i^sgarding compassionats appointment in of r-espondent No.2- regarciingi •hin G oeriod of 3 monThs fromtodcv. ^sgid, the petition stands elisposed of. |'58/2006 also stands djsposed of '' 4s"tified copy of this order. Sd!- ^ C.Shadoo jydge .fordsaid [Tft^ ^RaA)