IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2749 of 2009 1.The State Of Bihar through Secretary-cum- Inspector General, Registration, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 2.The Secretary-cum-Inspector General, Registration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Additional Secretary of Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 4.The District Sub-Registrar, Muzaffarpur ………. Petitioners(Respondents) Versus 1.Sukhdeo Tiwary, son of Late Ramfal Tiwary, resident of village, P.O. and P.S. Paru, District- Muzaffarpur. ………….. Petitioner-Respondent 2.The Accountant General Bihar, Patna Office, situated at Biscomaun Building, Gandhi Maidan, Patna. …………….Resp[ondent-Respondent --------------------------- 3. 07/12/2011 No one appears for the petitioner. This application has been filed for modification of the order dated 26.9.2008 passed in C.W.J.C.No.12265 of 2006 and other analogous cases directing the respondents to consider the claim of retrial benefits and other dues of the petitioners and pay the same. In this application, it is claimed that the District Sub Registrar had filed counter affidavit in the writ application. However, it is apparent from paragraph 10 of this application that the rejection of the claim of the petitioner was communicated to the petitioner only through memo no.1890 dated 2 29.7.2009 i.e. much after the writ application was disposed of. In the circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in this application. The same is accordingly dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)