HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26284 of 2010 Date 25.10.2010 Between: Vakati Silpa. ..... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector, Nellore SPSR Nellore District and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for Respondent :AGP for Civil Supplies HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26284 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the order dated 22.09.2010 passed by respondent No.1. The petitioner is a fair price shop dealer. On the basis of an inspection wherein certain irregularities were allegedly detected, respondent No.2 has initiated proceedings against the petitioner for cancellation of her authorization. Pending the said proceedings, respondent No.2 has provisionally suspended the petitioner’s authorization by his order dated 16.07.2010. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed an appeal before respondent No.1, who, by his order dated 05.08.2010, stayed the operation of the order of respondent No.2. However, by the impugned order, respondent No.1 has vacated the stay while directing respondent No.2 to complete the enquiry within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. I have heard Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. A perusal of the impugned order shows that respondent No.1 failed to give any reasons, whatsoever, while vacating the interim order. The fact that he has granted the interim order would give rise to a presumption that he was satisfied that the prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury are in favour of the petitioner. That being the case, it is obligatory on the part of respondent No.1 to assign reasons for coming to a different conclusion and vacating the interim order. Respondent No.1 failed to follow this fair procedure in passing the impugned order. The Writ Petition is, therefore, allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The order dated 05.08.2010 of respondent No.1 stands revived. The impugned order to the extent of giving direction to respondent No.2, to complete the enquiry and pass an appropriate order within the stipulated time, stands confirmed. As a sequel to disposal of the main petition, WPMP.No. 33563 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:25.10.2010 usd