w' o * 9 ^i. <-> n_ -I- 3T T^ 1 7? o Ui 0~ ' CP '^~ TS s- r» ^ i "^ s: I i. ^ 1 t. —^ O -h -+ -+ w-+ -+ 1 00s N N '-+ o3 o h "^'\ nw c: ro 0 -+ o o "-1- -S "3 o (ft (5 o -h °s •^ ~s -^i- vV, "A ••, •o \ •< CL O 3" ~s -+ o -^ "I ^ ? c y> Q. <S w s o ?3. -a- ? -+ O R tn r> tu -9 ^o ffl B o |B |0 16 oBx R 1-* E« \w 10l^1» Is o >_ c fS lin te •^ ^ ^> \ svsS. •.^s^^w/f^s'i^^.-iiie&'sas&s-ciis.siKaaiesisssSHfi {, "^uuaii" WRIT PETmONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CO N STITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OFCHHATTCSeARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5)No. 931 of 2007 Petitioner : Sewak Ram Patel Versus Respondents State of Chhatt-isgarh & o'thers 1. Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Amit Kuroar 5harma, Advocate for -the Petitioner. AAs. Dipali Pandey, Pomel Lonwyer for the State/respondents. ORtSER tfh (Passed on this 20T" Day of February, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Examination certificate on 27-3-1997, on his own expenses. 2. Leamed counsel apfwarmg for -the fwtitioner submits -that the question involved, herein asto whe-ther the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Examination Cert-ificate on his owm expenses, is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court m the case of Yashwant Kunar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. Dwg ond another {2006 Ctl) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court- in the case of Ya^iwaait Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. AAunicipdl Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, —.Mutt!i ihM Bu«adaa8^8S%';n"'t, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Exammatitm Certificate on their <M»n expenses, are covered by the circutar dated 24.12,98 issued by the State ©ovemmentof AAadhya ProdeA. Leamed counsel for the petitwner further submits Ihat the facts and question of kxwinvolved in the presait cc®eAre squarely covered by decision of this Court in Ihe case of Yaslwant Kunw Niaradwaj Vs. rtwiicipal Corporotion, Durg and anether (Supra), to which leamed counset appau'ing for the reqiondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by teamed counsel appeou'ing for the petitt'oner, Accordingly, the writ petition is atlow»dm terms of the ordw paased in the o»se of yashwan* Kunar Bharudwty Vs. rtuiucipal Corporotion, Durg and another (Supra), aibject to verification of •the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 cmd furt+ier whether he has been paid two advcnce increnients or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- sat'shK.Agmhotri Judge Subhash