Crl. Misc. No.M-9164 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-9164 of 2009 Date of decision:27.11.2009. Saveen Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In the context of the facts noticed in the order dated 12.11.2009, the learned State counsel informs that out of the three left out witnesses, two witnesses were examined on 21.11.2009 and the matter is presently listed for 02.12.2009 for examining the only left out witnesses. On consensual basis, the learned trial Court is directed to positively conclude the trial itself by or on 31.03.2010. In case the trial is not concluded by that period, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The State shall also be under a liability to conclude its evidence by the date aforementioned. The acknowledgment (of copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry Crl. Misc. No.M-9164 of 2009 -2- of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by aforementioned date. In the meantime, in view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, the State is directed to get the petitioner treated at AIIMS, New Delhi. The direction shall be implemented forthwith. In the light of that direction, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not press this plea for interim bail. Disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Special Secretary of this Court. November 27, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE