1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4292 OF 2005 The Lasalgaon Merchant Association Ltd. & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Co-operation, Marketing & Textile Department, Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.C.T.Chandratre for the Petitioners. Mr.P.M.Patil, AGP for the State. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : A.P.SHAH, A.P.SHAH, A.P.SHAH, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 7th July, 2005. P.C. : Heard advocate for the Petitioners and learned AGP appearing for the Respondents. The election programme is already declared 2 and the process of election has commenced. Once the electoral roll is published and the election programme has commenced, it is not permissible for the Courts to interfere under Article 226 and the aggrieved party can always agitate this issue in an election petition in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Shri Sant Satguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha Utpadak Sanstha v. State of Maharashtra (2002(1)Mh.L.J. 659). The Petition is dismissed.