1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9876 OF 2009 Smt. Reena Anant Bari & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Aryan Education Society & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Santosh Nalawade & Mr. M.P.Vashi i/b. M/s. M.P.Vashi & Associates, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr. S.V.Gavand, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, Govt. Pleader, for respondent Nos. 4 & 6. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 1st December, 2009. P.C. 1. It is the case of the petitioners that after following due process, the petitioners were issued the letter of appointment on 16.10.2009. By a subsequent communication dated 3.11.2009, the petitioners were further informed that it will not be possible to allow the petitioners to resume duties. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that after following the due 2 process, they were selected and the Management could not have taken such a stand. 3. It will not be possible for this Court, at this stage, to consider that aspect. It is pointed out that advertisement was issued in terms of the Rules. Considering the controversy, we direct the respondent No.5 to hear the petitioner and the Management and the Principal of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and thereafter to issue directions whether the selection of the petitioners is made according to law, to protect the appointment, and if not according to law, then permit the Management to start the process afresh. The entire exercise to be completed within four weeks. If the order passed is adverse to any contesting parties, liberty to them to challenge the same. With the above observations, the Petition is disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)