IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRR No. M 767 of 2010 Date of decision: 14.03.2011 Smt. Gajna and another ........ Petitioners Versus Jagdish ........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Ms Adish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent states that the petitioners have withdrawn the main case before the trial Court and during the pendency of the present petition, the matter has been compromised and as such, the present petition is rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 14.03.2011 mohan