... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.2244 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.2244 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO.2244 OF 2005 ...................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ...................................................... Mr. S.V. Pande for the Appellant. Mr. Mukesh Subramaniam for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 10, 2006. DATE : MARCH 10, 2006. DATE : MARCH 10, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Admit. Shri Subramaniam waives service for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. Taken up for hearing forthwith by the consent of the parties. 2. The Advocates appearing for the parties have filed consent terms. The Advocates appearing for the parties stated that they have signed the consent terms. They further stated that the Appellant has duly signed consent terms. The constituted attorney of the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 has signed the consent terms. Shri Subramaniam ... 2 ... appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 states that true copy of Power of Attorney has been produced alongwith his vakalatnama and the person who has signed the consent terms is a Power of Attorney holder of the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. 3. Consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. From the cause title it appears that none of the parties is minor. Hence, this Appeal can be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 4. Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms filed today. Decree be drawn accordingly. 5. The Appellant is entitled to refund of court fees as per the rules. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE