IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2010 SMT. JYOTI RAJESHWAR RAO ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. A. K. TALWAR ... Respondent Mrs. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Anthony D'silva, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 14th March, 2011 P.C. Heard Mrs. Dessai, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Silva, learned Counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2. 2. By this revision application, the applicant, who is the original complainant, has challenged the judgment and order dated 24th August, 2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji in Criminal Revision Application No.44/2010 by which the learned Judge has quashed the order issuing process passed by the Magistrate and further directed the learned Magistrate to call for report from the Police Officer investigating into the report lodged by the respondent. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, respondent no.1 and learned Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2, I find that the approach of the learned Sessions Judge cannot be faulted. In my considered opinion, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has correctly appreciated the legal and factual position and passed the impugned order. No interference is warranted with the impugned order in exercise of revisional jurisdiction by this Court. Hence, Revision Application is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA