IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO : 248 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 07/12/2007 in WP NO : 14849 OF 2006 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Joshi Jagdish Prasad, s/o late Shri Mohanlal Joshi, R/o.House No.72, Banjara Niwas, Sangeet Sagar, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary to Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, Maharashtra. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: MR.PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : JUDGMENT Per Anil R. Dave, CJ Looking to the facts of the case, in our opinion, it would be just and proper if the learned Single Judge is requested to take up the Writ Petition for final hearing. The learned Advocates appearing for the parties have submitted that they would proceed with the final hearing and would not pray for time if the petition is notified for final hearing. In the circumstances, the learned Advocate for the appellant-original petitioner shall submit an application to the learned Single Judge making a request for notifying the petition at an early date for final hearing. If such an application is made, we are sure that the petition shall be taken up for final hearing at an early date. Learned Advocate Sri Pratap Nmarayan Sanghi seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Appeal in view of the above development in the matter. Permission is granted. Writ Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 5th March, 2008 T.CH. SURYA RAO, J vtv