'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGAR AT BILASPUR §EF0RE THE HON .v/ w“ Dr. S/o— Sudhakar Late Shri Vasant VL. Killedax Kiuedax Distt. Agedég . . Officer, T.B. Clinic, Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER : VERSUS 1. STATE OF (C.G.) tkyx («gt/i..- 4f!*§>\f V ¢WTmough 2. D.K. The Director Secretariate,Raipur, Secretary Health Health Services,Raipur, (C.G.) D (C.G.) ”Petition U/S 226/227 of the Constitutional Law of India . RESPONDENTS: g Vj q ept.Secretariate, w‘ V ff H ge 4a é HIQH GQUET OF QHHAJ !. ISGARH AT BILA§PLE Writ Petition No. 131s of 2on1 Petitioner : , Dr.$udnakar‘VasamKmedarV Versus Re$pondenis S‘mia of Ch'naih'sgarh and anoiher tlon’hle Shri Sati$h K. Aqnihoti, J, Ms. Deepali Pandey, Pane! lawyer far tha respondantslstate. ORDER (Passed on this 21 9* day of February, 2007) The petitioner, while working as District T.B. Omcer in T.B. Hospiial, Raipur was transferred to Community Heaith éemre-Magariod. District Dhamtari; vide impugned order dated 2312001 (N1). This Court wde inierim cider“ dried 14.3.‘w. ”as stayw the impugned order dated 27.7.1994 (N1), theieby the petitioner shaii be aiiawed to continue in " f, the present place e. peeing as Dietriet Officer, TB. HeepiQai, Raipur.’ Be that as it may, wrth the passage ef time this petition has become V " infructuous; as period of transfer is nut applicable forever. At this point ai‘ time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the respondeme are at iiberiy to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the pubiic interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on ‘ compiiance of the eariier transfer order. it is weii sewed principle of iaw that trensferis an incidence of $rvioe and it is r the empioyer V to decide as to where a rttcuier smear/empi _ be posted keeping in View pubiic interest asvweii as administrative exigency. " ‘ ..€ “Al‘l L- This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer‘mattet and this ‘ } Present: None appears for the petitioner.