- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.589 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.589 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.589 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.355 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.355 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.355 OF 2005 Khalilulla Rahimtulla Maner & Ors. ...Applicants vs. M/s.Ghatge Patil Industries Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni i/b Mr.V.V.Purwant for the Appellants Mr.N.V.Walawalkar i/b Mr.G.H.Keluskar for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 13,2005. : APRIL 13,2005. : APRIL 13,2005. 1. Rule. Respondent waives service. 2. It is brought to my notice that during the pendency of the Appeal in first Appellate court by order dated 9th November 2001 both the parties were directed to maintain status quo as on 15th October 2001. The said order was operating till the final disposal of the Appeal in the first Appellate Court. 3. In view of this position, till the final disposal of the Second Appeal, order dated 9th November 2001 passed by the first Appellate Court below Application Exh.7 in Regular Civil Appeal No.458 of 2001 will continue to operate. 4. Shri Walawalkar appearing for the Respondent pointed out that the suit for specific performance filed by the Respondent on the basis of suit agreement is pending in the Trial Court. It is obvious that the concerned Court will decide the suit on its own merits. - 2 - JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.