,^ \M -HC-22 'TS? •^1<<1<'1''<, anl^'is, facii'My 3n^?r 'tR^? IIICTI g,ijjq,——'——""""""""""""~^^ 200 ^ f^^T' 31lt?I^iI Pi-ii* SV^S sh+ii<=t) ^fia SII^TTCIfWHfel (Sinale Bench: Hon'ble n(r. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) Writ Petitipn (sl Mo. (PR No.6018/08) (Petition underArt.22|6 of Constitution of India) PETITIONER B.P. Mishrt 62 years, B.T.I.Schobl D?/o Veilsus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. The Area Madeena Bijilding yees 5. The Emplc Through-Cotimissiqner Mayur Bhaw^n, 10.12.2008 Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocjate Mr. Roshan Dubey, Advocate The matfer is listed on default.l The default pointed out by the hleard finallywith the consent By theinstant petition the petit II underthe respondents, has prayec) the pension ofthe petitioner. ; 'hl^fd'fl-f tiwiA'4 fezt <(»i<ii< ^7 3lP<i*I 3)1^1 S/o LateShri M.L. Mishra, Aged about House No.E-5, Gayatri Nagar, Behind , Raipur, Disft. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Food Corpcjration of India, Through the Managing Director, H^ad Quarter-New Delhi, 16-20 Bara Khamba Lade, NEW DELHI The Executjve Director, Food Corporation of India, Dhiraj Arm^ Bui'ding, Near Anant Kanekar Police Station, Ban|lra (East) MUMBAI- 400051 The General| Manager, Food Corporation of India, Ring Road Chour^ha, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhatisgarh. Manager, Food I, Jail Road, Corporation of India, Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, 8 & 9th Floor, , Connaught Circus, New Delhi-1. for the petitioner. l|or the respondents. bffice is condoned. (|)f both the parties. joner, who is working as Assistant Grade fqr a direction to the respondents to fix XI-HC-22 %.% t V-i-^'W.h. B ';i!ll®!6iii& 1 : i^ ^ ii:- r^ ' i.-i" .V ^. vtfy sii^r^r R-fi«b311^1 ^i*ii(n <-if?a 'yst •^WM^, B-al'M'is, fafiiyy sni^r tra^ ^/^ ^/3 WHWT tniich "WI. 200,^ iq^s' sn^CT t^IRR'(ito furtier Learned counsel for the petiticj forwarding the necessary particulars made from the salary ofthe petitioner] the pension of the petitioner. He squarely covered by the order dated| W.P. (s) No.6283/07 between M.R. B| others and this petition may also be| 24.10.2007 passed by this Cpurt in th| Learned counsel forthe respoij the petition is disposed of in terms this Court. In view of the submissions petition is disposed of with liberty before respondent No.1 along with c] of three weeks' from today and on concerned documents bf the respondent No.1 to 5, respondent Nc| petitioner and forward the papers re| within a period of 2 months from th^ dispose ofthe representation in Certified copy as per rules. |ner submits that respondent No.1 is not |to respondent No.5 regarding deduction in order to enable respondent No.5 to fix submits that case of the petitioner is 24.10.2007 passed by this Court in the ^ionsle Vs. Food Corporation of India and |disposed of in terms of the order dated ^ matter of M.R. Bhonsle (supra). idents submits that he has no objection if the order dated 24.10.2007 passed by <^l^fi?pfl*I +1i+1Clf'^ FS^ <f<q<^l< ^? sri^gii ail^l ctf maipe by learned counsel for the parties, this t|3 the petitioner to make representation ^rtified copy of this order within a period [such representation being made, if the pet|ti6ner have not been forwarded by ,1 shall examine the poinfs raised by the jating to his pension to respondent No.5 date of receipt of the representation or accoi|dance with law within the said period. Judge ^ra