IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6770 of 2011. Decided on: August 19, 2011. Bhagat Ram. Versus State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has two grievances: (i) counting of adhoc JBT service for the purpose of increments and pension; (ii) the adhoc service followed by regular service in the post of Language Teacher for the purpose of increments and pension. As far as counting of adhoc JBT service is concerned, it is now settled that the same can be counted only as qualifying service for the purpose of pension and not for the purpose of increments. As far as adhoc service followed by regular service as Language Teacher is concerned, the said adhoc service will be counted for the purpose of increments and pension as well in view of the decision of this Court rendered in LPA 36 of 2010, titled Sita Ram versus State of H.P. & ors. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 19, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (vs) Judge.