IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 7375 of 2011() ---------------------------------- (CRIME NO.598/2011 OF ALAPPUZHA NORTH POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT) ..... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3 & 5 ------------------------------------------ 1. SABITH SREEDHAR, S/O. SIVADASAN, THAZHCHAYIL, PONNADU P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 2. BITTU, PUTHUVAL VEETTIL, MANNANCHERRY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. S. HYMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs P.S.GOPINATHAN, J ---------------------------- B.A. NO. 7375 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011. O R D E R Petitioners are accused Nos. 3 and 5 in Crime No.598/2010 of Alappuzha North Police Station for the offence under Sections 143, 147, 148, 153 A, 323, 324, 326, 341 and 308 r/w section 149 I.P.C. Apprehending, arrest, detention and torture of the hands of the investigating officer, this petition was filed. It is seen that the crime occurred as early as on 28-07-2011. The petitioners had got ample opportunity to apply for regular bail, so far as they were not arrested. Therefore, there is no basic for the apprehension of the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that other accused were arrested and they were granted regular bail by the learned Sessions Judge. In the above circumstance, I find no reason for the Sessions Court. In the above circumstance, I find that there is no reason for denying regular bail to the petitioners also. Therefore, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to apply for regular bail. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE amk