1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.379 OF 2010. MILIND RAMDASJI KHONDE VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO P.S. ARVI DISTT. WARDHA. ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri M. B. Naidu, Advocate for the applicant. Shri D. B. Yengal, APP for State respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 17th MARCH, 2010. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail in Crime No.34 of 2010 registered with Arvi Police Station on 12-02-2010. 2. The First Information spells out that one of the complainants Smt. Kusumbai Kavidas Raut and her son Rajesh Kavidas Raut died due to electrocution on the boundary of the field of the accused and the shock was due electric wire which were laid on the Dhura of the field in order to prevent the animals from destroying the crops of the field. 2 3. The application for anticipatory bail has been strongly opposed by the learned APP. He has also tendered some papers in relation to the crime for perusal of the Court. 4. The grounds for opposing the anticipatory bail advanced before the Court are :- (1) That the electric wire used for preventing animals on the boundary of the field is to be recovered. (2) The information as to how the electrocution is done is to be collected. (3) That the accused is not providing true and correct information. 5. The case diary reveals that the spot panchama is already completed. Even the manner in which the electric supply was secured through the electric meter on the spot of the offence has also been brought on record. 6. In this situation, which is emerging from the record, the objection of the learned APP that the cable is to be recovered and from where the electric supply was taken is to be explored, does not find any foundation. 7. In this background, the applicant has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. 8. Ad interim bail order passed by this Court on 4th March, 2010 is made absolute. 3 Judge //mule//