IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24240 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. An amount of Rs. 2,20,540/- was withdrawn through five cheques issued with joint signature of the then Secretary and complainant/informant. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that certainly it was misappropriation of fund of different schemes either Secretary was more beneficiary or both the informant and Secretary were equally but as for this petitioner is concerned he was to make payment if cheque was presented bearing genuine signature. No where it has come that any of the signatures either of the informant or of Secretary was forged. It is stressed by learned counsel that to save their skin this case is lodged but refusal of anticipatory bail never can be justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above 2 named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Judawanpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)