'M itUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WMTPETITIONICINO. •^2-t(, OF 2011 PETITIONER Laxminarayan S/o Rafflautar Jayaswal, aged about 60 years; R/o Village Patfhalgaon, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur C.G. VERSUS 1: State of C.G. through the Secretary Revenue Department, DKS BIiawan Raipur C.G. 2. The Collector, Jashpur, District RESPONDENT .^ ^c>p^---< v^'^' ..-•< VL^ Jashpur C.G. •^ 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Patthalgaon, District Jashpur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION 7 ^ OF INDIA HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (ON0.7216 OF 2011 PETITIONER Laxminarayan RESPONDENTS Versus StateofC.G. & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 1st day of December, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counse] appearing for the State submits that the Tahsildar, without affording proper opportunity of hearing and granting reasonable time to the petitioner, has passed the ordei under Section 148 (s/c 248) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. Learned counsel further submits that no effect shall be given to the impugned notice and the authorities may be permitted to initiate fresh proceedings after registering the case and thereafter, proper opportunity of hearing would be afforded to the petitioner before passing the order. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy today. Gowri Sd/- .. ._„ s^K.Tihotrl Judge ^