IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M 16188 of 2009 Date of decision : June 10, 2009 Anchla Devi and another Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have got married against the wishes of respondent No. 4- Ramesh Chander, respondent No. 5 – Ajit Ram and respondent No. 6 – Sunil Kumar and there is threat to their life and liberty from them. He contends that for seeking police help they have preferred a representation dated 8.6.2009 (Annexure P-6) with a copy thereof to S.H.O. Police Station Shimlapuri, Ludhiana. He submits that they would be satisfied, if a direction be issued to Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana - respondent No. 2 and S.H.O. Police Station Shimlapuri, Ludhiana – respondent No. 3 to look into the matter and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Without going into the merits of the case and the assertions as made by counsel for the petitioners, a direction is issued to respondent No. 2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana and S.H.O. Police Station Shimlapuri, Ludhiana – respondent No. 3 to look into the representation dated (Annexure P-6), preferred by the petitioners and take necessary steps in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) 10.06.2009 JUDGE reena