SM 1 41.ao.661.11.ca.889.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 661 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 889 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 661 OF 2011 Madhukant Zaverchand Ghatalia ....Appellant Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumai ....Respondents ____________ Shri. P. G. Lad i/b M/s. Aparna Murlidharan for the Appellant. Smt. K. K. Soraan for the Respondent. Shri. K. H. Mody, learned Advocate for the Intervener. Shri. S. L. Choudhary, Officer 'F' South Ward is present in the Court. CORAM: J. H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 6 TH JULY, 2011. P.C.: The Appeal is preferred by the original Plaintiff against refusal of ad­interim relief in pending Notice of Motion. Mr. K. H. Mody, Advocate for the landlord appears to intervene. The learned Counsel for the Municipal Corporation, on instructions from Shri. S. L. Choudhary, Officer 'F' Sourth Ward, makes a statement that the Corporation has already demolished two toilets, one tin shed and approximately 20 sq.ft portion of loft area. SM 2 41.ao.661.11.ca.889.11 2. In view of the above circumstances, in my opinion, the Appeal and Application may be disposed of with following directions: (i) The Plaintiff shall implead the landlord as a Defendant in suit (St.) No. 1250 of 2011 as well as in the Notice of Motion. (ii) The Defendants/Respondents shall file reply and/or written statement within four weeks and the Trial Court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within six weeks thereafter. Till then, the status quo as of now, be maintained. (iii) The Appeal and Application stand disposed of accordingly. (J. H. BHATIA, J.)