1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8429 OF 2011 M/S S P BOTHRA AND SONS THR. ITS PARTNER Prafulla Subhash Bothra, age 32 yrs,Occ. Business, R/o Vaijapur, Tq. Vaijapur, District. Aurangabad, Petitioner. VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF MAH through its Principal Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32. [Copy to be served on Govt. Pleader, High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad.] 2- The Collector, Aurangabad. District Aurangabad. 3- The District Supply Officer, Aurangabad. Respondents. ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Bagul D.S Mr. B.N.Patil AGP for respondents. ... CORAM : S V GANGAPURWALA, J. Dated: November 21, 2011 ... 2 ORAL JUDGMENT :- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. The petitioner impugns the notice dated 14.10.2011 issued by the respondent No.2 thereby asking the petitioner to show cause as to why the Self Kerosene Quota of the petitioner should not be stopped. 3. Mr. Bagul learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that petitioner has given a representation on 6.1.2010 and further reply on 6.1.2010. The Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.8776/2011 has directed vide its order dated 21.11.2011 that the Collector to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 6.1.2010 within a period of four weeks. 4. The Collector shall consider the reply given to the Show Cause Notice alongwith the representation dated 6.1.2010 and 3 shall decide the Representation as directed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.8776/2011 and say given by the present petitioner to the show cause notice simultaneously. This Court vide order dated 28.10.2011 had directed the Collector, Aurangabad “not to take any coercive action on the notice served on the petitioner. Same protection is continued till the decision is taken on the show cause notice. Rule is made absolute in above terms. No costs. ( S V GANGAPURWALA, J. ) aaa/- ... 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.8429/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 21-11-2011 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE : THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.V.GANGAPURWALA : 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be permitted to see the judgment ? ...Yes.. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? ..Yes/No.. 3. Whether His Lordship wishes to see the fair copy of the judgment ? ..No.. 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? ..No.. 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judges ? ..No.. 6. Whether the case involves an important question of law and whether a copy of the judgment should be sent to Nagpur, Bombay and Goa offices ? ..No.. ( Mrs. Anuja A. Ankush ) P. A. to the Hon’ble Judge ....