IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30459 of 2008 1. AMIT KUMAR @ MONU @ MONU KUMAR. 2. SACHITANAND VERMA. 3. ANKUR KUMAR @ ANKUR VERMA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also for the informant who has entered appearance suo motu to oppose the application. Arrah Town P.S. Case No.4/08 came to be lodged by the informant. Case No.5/08 also under Section-307 and other Sections of I.P.C. came to be lodged against the informant. Both sides are residents of the same locality. From a conjoint reading of the two F.I.Rs. it is apparent that after having established schools for imparting the education, both have indulged in imparting a different kind of education by indulging in a fracas for business rivalry. The informant and co-accused in Case No.5/08 have been enlarged on police bail. The Court finds no justification to subject the petitioners to the rigours of custody in the nature of the allegations, and more particularly when police bail on similar allegations has been granted to the informant and other co-accused along with him. Having considered the facts and circumstances - 2 - of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand ) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Arrah in Ara Town P.S. Case No.4 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )