vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8419 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.8419 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.8419 OF 2006 Gadhinglaj Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ... Petitioner V/s. Jaising Shantaram Patil & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.S.S. Patwardhan for Petitioner Mr.K.S. Bapat for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JUNE 16, 2007 JUNE 16, 2007 JUNE 16, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Labour Court had refused to grant interim relief to the Respondent-workman who has filed complaint under Item 1 (a), (b), (d) and (f) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act. Aggrieved by the order of the Labour Court, the Respondent filed revision application (ULP) No.30 of 2003. That application has been allowed by the Industrial Court and hence, the Respondent workman has been reinstated in service from December 2006. In such circumstances, the Petition need not be entertained againt the interim order. Petition rejected.