1 wp-9455.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9455 OF 2010 Mrs.Sunanda Madhavrao Jagadale. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. S.S.Pakale i/b. K.J.Phakade for the petitioner. A.B.Vagyani, AGP for respondent No.1. S.R.Ganbavle for respondent No.2. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 2nd February 2011. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. Perused petition. 2. The petitioner is challenging the suspension order dated 27th July, 2010 passed by the respondent No.4- Block Development Officer contending that the order of suspension is without authority of law since no powers to suspend were delegated under clause 3 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Dist. Service Rules, 1964 by the Chief Executive Officer. 2 wp-9455.10 3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents brought to our notice the delegation of powers in favour of the author of the order of suspension. Hence the submission made in this behalf have no force. 4. So far as non-payment of subsistence allowance to the petitioner is concerned, the petitioner appears to be justified in making grievance. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Zilla Parishad makes a statement that within a period of three weeks the entire arrears of subsistence allowance will be paid to the petitioner and further it will be paid to him every month on or before 5th of each month. The statement made in this behalf is taken on record. 5. So far as other grounds are concerned, at this stage, we do not propose to go into those grounds and will be looked into as and when the final order is suffered by the petitioner. 6. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)