IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1255 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.1255 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.1255 OF 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2946 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL NO.2946 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL NO.2946 OF 2007 G.N.Hegde .. Appellant Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of .. Respondents Central Circle -34 Mumbai Mr.Sameer Dalal for Appellant Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 28th April, 2008 : 28th April, 2008 : 28th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents. 2. By this appeal, filed by the appellant-assessee, the appellant is seeking condonation of 248 days delay in filing this above appeal. There is no affidavit controverting the statements made in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion. For the reasons stated in para 5 to 10 therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer cause (a). 3. Appeal to come on board for admission in the month of September, 2008 subject to numbering. (A.V. (A.V. (A.V. Nirgude,J) Nirgude,J) Nirgude,J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)