IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11216 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. Mata Ram. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr. Trilok Jamwal,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though the services of similarly situate persons have been regularized and he has been left out. Mr. Trilok Jamwal, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty reserved to his client to make a representation to the respondent No.1 to seek regularization within a period of one month from today. Thereafter, the Secretary (Forests) shall decide the same in accordance with law and shall also take into consideration if the services of the similarly situate persons have been regularized or not. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 21, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No.