IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41660 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR SINGH @ MUKESH KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.11.10. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.04.2010 in a case registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that one robbed Indica Car was recovered on the basis of confessional statement of Sachin Kumar when Sachin Kumar and Chhotu Yadav were caught and from the house of Sachin Kumar a cheque of Rs. 2,00,000/- was recovered in the name of petitioner. It is submitted that the aforesaid cheque was for the sake of purchase of land. It is further submitted that the petitioner was never been involved in any other case prior to the institution of the present case but subsequent to filing of present case he has been involved in another case under Sections 324, 323 and 307 of the I.P.C. Considering the fact that there is no 2 recovery of the robbed article from possession of the petitioner and the petitioner was never been involved in similar nature of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Arra in connection with Sahpur P. S. Case No. 222 of 2009, Tr. No. 1421 of 2010. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)