^\^l^g^.^^ ^ ^^:y^r----------''''''''~ ^^"-^,-. ,^ ^"""^ I'nlz^?^ (^^T5Z5 Writ Petition (S) No. ^ ^°-^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. /2010 Petitioners (1) / (2) / [3] Kamaldas Murchale, aged about 37 years S/o Late Fattedas, Murchale, Village Mahlinaka Post Madmada, Tahsil Bodla Distt. Kabirdham Shiksha Karmi Grade - III Vinod Kumar Chandravanshi aged about 29 years,S/o Mohanrara Chandravashi, Village Gandai Kurd Post Kharhara, Tahsil Bodla, Distt. KabirDham. Shiksha Karmi Grade-III Nakulram Jaiswal, aged about 30 years S/o Shri Mahajanlal Jaiswal, R/o- Village 8s Post - Khairzitti (Purana) Tdhsil- Pandariya, District - KabirDham. Shiksha Karmi Grade-III Respondents (2) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secetory Education Departnient D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Director Public Instruction Office of Directrect Public Education Raipur. District Education Officer, KabirDham. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ,^ 1. 2, 3. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As Stated in the cause title Particulars of the Respondents As Stated in the cause title Particular of order against which the present l;;n ^ll-i;]-!—::-^-^-:'.!!; !S!filti(-.4'—"i-4 ~vr~" .„•« HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition(S) No. 6607 of 2010 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS VERSUS Kamaldas Murchate andothers State of Chhattisgarh and others ..IS ffiia1" Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel for the petitioners. Smt. Smitha Ghai PL for respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (23.11.2010) Grievance of the petitioners in this petition is that jnitially they were appointed as Contract Teacher Grade III and thereafter as Shiksha Karmi Grade III but they are not being permitted to appear for the postof Head Masfer on the ground that they do not have the experience of sevenyears as Shiksha Karmi. 2. Couns^l for the respondents/State submits that now the government has taken a decision to permit all those Shiksha Karmis who have the experience of seven years either on the post of Contract Teacheror on the post of Shiksha Karmi and therefore, there remains nothing in the present petition. She has shown the letterdated 19.11.2010 issued bythe Director, Public Instructions, Raipur addressed to the Advocate General. Copy of the said letter has been given to Shri Kotecha also and he is satisfied with thesame. Counsel for the petitioners submits that though the dateof the examination for the post of head master has not yet been declared, declaration to that effect may be made at any time, and as the petitioners apprehend that they may not be permitted to appear in the same, a direction may be issued to the competent authority to permit them to appear in the said examination. / / 3. State counsel submits that the apprehension of the petitioners is premature and ifthey have dulyfilled in the application forms, the authority concerned would act pursuant to the decision taken by the State Government vide letter dated 19.11.2010. ri?~ l^f '•)> •y-».,^f —2.— 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, as nothing survives in the petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the competent authorityto permit the petitioners to appear in the examination whenever they are scheduled to take place, for the post of Head Master pursuant to the decision taken by the State Government subject to the verification of the fact that the petitioners have filled in their forms and the same have been duly aiccepted by the authority concerned. 5. If the grievance of the petitioners still survives, they would be at liberty to approach this Court. — SdA Pritinker Diwakar / Judge 'M, .'- 's&^^^' WsS6e;vv K~r"