THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21033 of 2010 ORDER: Respondent Nos.3 to 6 purchased four shops sold by Sri Venugopala Swamy Temple, respondent No.2 herein, in the year 2000. In the immediate neighbourhood is the petitioner, who also purchased shops from the Temple. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 have demolished the shops and started construction of new ones. The petitioner contends that the construction is being made not only without permission but also by encroaching into the property of the Temple and the public lane, etc. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take action against respondent Nos.3 to 6 and the construction made by them. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 filed a written statement stating that though they applied for permission, respondent No.1 has rejected the same. They submit that fresh efforts would be made to obtain permission. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.3 to 6 are making construction without permission. It is rather unfortunate that the Municipality did not stop the construction, which was taking place without permission. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 ought to have waited till the permission is accorded. Instead, they have proceeded with the construction after it was rejected. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 6 submits that his clients would make efforts to get permission. The feasibility of granting permission at this stage needs to be considered by respondent No.1. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that respondent Nos.3 to 6 shall not undertake any further construction or other activity over the premises till respondent No.1 accords permission. It shall be open to the petitioner to raise objection for the construction that has been made so far or the one that may be permitted by respondent No.1. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:04.02.2011 kdl