IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2010 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1572 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.18222/2009 Dated 30/06/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.SUBRAMANIAN, S/O.LATE KELU MASTER, MANAGER, A.U.P.SCHOOL, KARAKKUNNU, P.O.KARAKKUNNU, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JIJI THOMAS SRIG.B.SHAMJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SHRI.JAMES VARGHESE I.A.S., FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHRI.MUHAMMED HANEESH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SHRI.G.BALACHANDRAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI P.NARAYANAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contempt of Court Case No.1572/2009-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 17th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner alleges non compliance of the directions issued in Annexure-A Judgment. Now the matter is covered by the directions issued by the Apex Court in S.L.P.No.3760/2010 and connected cases. There, the Apex Court passed the following order:- “.....In the meanwhile we direct that the respondents will continue to receive their salaries/allowances as per the impugned Government order till the present matters are decided. We further direct that the contempt proceedings which have been initiated by the respondent shall remain stayed till further orders.” 2. In the light of the above order, no further orders are called for in this contempt of court case and the amount directed to be disbursed by the Apex Court will be released to the petitioner also and if any further grievances are there for the petitioner in the matter, he can approach the authority concerned. The contempt of court case is accordingly closed. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms