^ c^' \ ^"^^ S.B. Matteri IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETITION (S\ NO.^A^/2010. PETITIONER: Smt.Gayatri Tondan, wife of Nakul Das Kurre, aged about 43 years, working as Assistant Teacher at Govt. Middle School, Block Amlidih, District Baloda Bazar (Education), Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. versus ResDondents Ay' )X%^i •^y ."•t>'>"y 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2/ District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh. ^.Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, Disfatict Raipur, C.G. ^ ^r^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE «- CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA 1 F-HC—78 a^r'^Tl^jN ^^T 3TI^T ^R?^' WH^TIWW^ T^r -q|^3!<nq, ^tl|^1*|(o, t^TRT^ ...^.(.&)....2:6.S3..1.. 6 200 3ff^?T TT^B (1?^^) ^^IWTrftn ^^ ^l^f^1'4iv1 "W^t ^ 'fe^ iFal^K ^^tRm'sn^i SB : Hontble 8hri Maaindra Mohcm Shrivastava, J. 16-06-2010 Shri C.J.K. Rao, couns^i fbr fhe petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Pane| Lawyer for the State/respondents. Heaid. Leamed counsel appe^ring for fhe petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitied to bene$t of two advaace mcrements on account of she haviag passed B,Ed, e^amuiation before her appointDient at her own cost It is submitted thalj is no longer res integra aad f Honyble Suprcme Court ia fh^ case ofAsha Seixena VB. Stcrte afSS.P. & Ors.. 2009 OEQ MPJR /Sq It is further submittedl view ia its order dated 06-021 the issue iavolved ia fhe prcsent petition the same h^ been finaUy decided by the 59. !that fhis Court has also taken a simUar h2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Leamed counsel for fhe petiti^ner further draws attentioa ofthis Court to order dated 29-04-2010 jpassed ia Writ Appeal No. 124 of 2009, whereia relyiag upon the jud^ment offhe Suprcme Court ia fhe case of Asha Saxeiia (suprc^ ond fhje order passed by thls Court m aiiother Writ Appeal No.87/2Q09, dir^ctions have been issued for consideration of fhe case for graiit of two ^dvsuace mcrements as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the Sts|te of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of fhe facts pleaded ia fhe petiti<|)n. :^!c^"'-^.. ^^"%. 1 j '^--ss^SG—IS 3TI^T ^T R'lJ<=h TT^T 3?T^T ^RW Praveen ~?^r ^i^scn^, ^ti1^ji^, f^<ni^^< WH^fT^tlT^ •l^ 200 3T^?T Tf5R7 (^qf^^T) IT^H^RTrf^T 3^I^I T—?. Leanied counsel for ttie petitioner would also be consi|dered In view of the stateid disposed offwifh a direction aad decide fhe claun of fbl mcrements as per circular d|ated Madhya Pradesh, afber verific^tion within a period ofeight weeks <=hi^f<n4)i Tn^tf ^f fc^l iPsi^K ^r^tRFT^TT^T rcspondents submite fbat case of the on the sanie Ihies. ent made above, fhis petitfon is jSnaUy X) fhe respondent authorities to consider e petitioner for graat of two advaace 21-09-1974 issued by fhe State of of fhe facte pleaded ia fhe petition from today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge