1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6910/2005. Misri Lal & Anr. VS A.D.J. No.1, Alwar & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6910/2005. Misri Lal and Another. VERSUS Additional District Judge No.1, Alwar and Others. 03.08.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Mohit Gupta, for the petitioners. Ms.Daya Sharma, for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the interim order dated 31.08.2005 by which the operation of the impugned order dated 30.07.2005 has been stayed. By the impugned order, the appeal filed by the respondent had been allowed and the order passed by the learned trial court dated 17.04.2004 was set aside. The learned trial court vide order dated 17.04.2004 had passed the order of temporary injunction in favour of the present petitioner. Thus, by the interim order dated 31.08.2005, the order of temporary injunction passed by the learned trial court has remained in force during the pendency of this writ petition. Learned counsel for the parties submit that now the matter is at the final stage where the final arguments in the suit have to be heard. 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6910/2005. Misri Lal & Anr. VS A.D.J. No.1, Alwar & Ors. In that view of the matter, without expressing any merits, I am inclined to confirm the interim order dated 31.08.2005 to last till the disposal of the suit. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. It is, however, made clear that the learned trial court is expected to decide the suit on the basis of the evidence led by the parties without being influenced either by the order passed by the learned courts below or by the fact that this writ petition has been disposed of while confirming the interim order as this court has not expressed any opinion so far as the merits of the case are concerned. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.