1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.367 OF 2010. SHRI CHAGANLAL GANGARAMJI SATPUTE VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. S/Shri A. S. Sonak and C. v. Sakhare, Advocates for the applicant. Shri S. S. Doifode, APP for respondent State.3. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 15th MARCH, 2010. 1. This is an application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code. 2. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned AGP for respondent State. 3. The purpose for which the police wants to interrogate the accused is to ascertain and identify the person with whose help tampering of electric meter is done. 4. It is not shown that after grant of anticipatory bail any notice or intimation was 2 sent to the applicant. 4. It is also seen that this Court had not directed the accused to appear before the police. Considering the entire situation and facts involved in the case, it shall suffice if the ad interim bail granted by this Court under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code is continued. 5. The applicant is directed to appear before the Police - Investigating Officer twice in a week for two weeks. 6. The first attendance shall commence from 19-3-2010 between 10 a.m. to 2.30 p.m., and on all such dates and times as the Investigating Officer may direct. 7. In view of this, the order granting ad interim bail passed on 3-3-2010 is made absolute subject to above conditions. Judge //mule//