A'E'^Ss C Sg '^ •-» ^rf5 i^W S-d ^^^.^••'fc^ St.ex^sis'! •'y' o" ! ("^ h IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. rciNo.12-19 / 2007 T^RT '-^- \^ Petitioner rjicuv^-p Resnondents P>&.-?e/T^-<:- i-<&- Jagdeo Singh Thakur, S/o / Raghunath Singh Thakur, Aged about 66 years, R/o Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS i) Smt. Sunder Bai, Widow of Champalal Jain * .••\sJlf ^2) Deepchand, S/o Late Champalal ^ipF/" ^"u .•''D&.'"'" ..•'"' —. , „, . . • 3) Todarmal, S/o Late Champalal Jain. ...NSM?r r* .»fr •••'' !<° ^••1 L<^' p^ £^'\6 ^t^ %\v 3) 4) 5) -6) 7) 8) Bhagchand, S/o Late Champalal Jain. Lunkaran, S/o Late Champalal Jain. Santosh, S/o Late Champalal Jain. (All R/o Tahsfl Dondi Lohara, Near Nagar Panchayat, Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) SmtDhelabai, W/o Mahavir Sancheti, R/o Shanichari Bazar, Durg, Tahsil and Distt. Durg Smt.Nirmala Bai, W/o. Narendra Baradiya, R/o Sadar Bazar, Dhamtari, Tahsil Dhamtari, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) >^ 9) State ofChhattisgarh~T<^<^^ 7-<'Aer/'/^°-v, OeH^'ltiiAT? OA?/- Dtv;, c'-t. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H6H COURT OF CHHATTISG/WH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C) No. 1219 of 2007 Petitioner Jagdeo Singh Thakur Vereus Respondents Smt. Sunder Bai and dhers SB-.Hon'bto Mr. Jusfice SaUsh K. AgnUwtri, J Shri P. ESvrakar, Senior Advocate witt Shri Anoop Majumdar, ^Jvocate and Shri P. R. Patankar, Advocate for the petiBoner. ORDER (Passed on this 26th day of February, 2007) 1. The petifioner has filed ttiis petiUon under Arttete 227 of the ConsStution of India, impugning the order dated 5.2.2007 (Annewjre P/8), passed by the Civil Judge, Class-1, Balod, District- Durg h Civil SuitNo.20-A/2005. 2. Leamed senior counsel appearing for Ihe petBioner submits that t»ythe impugned order dated 522007 the trial Court has rejected the applicaCon of the peUtioner (ptainfiff), fited under Order 26 Rule 9 ofthe Code of Civit Procedure for demarcafon of the suit, withaut considering the applicatfon in ttte Itoht of <he observaUons made in para 8 of 8»ejudgment and order dated 19^* December, 2006, pasaed by (his Court in Chri! Reviskin No. 1/20)6 (Sunder Bai and Others Vs. Jagdev Singh and another). 3. The subordinate Courts are bound to comply with (he law takl down by this Court. tt appears that teamed Judge tas cwnptetety tenor®dttre observation of this Court made in the cass of Sunder Bal (supra), and hasj^sssd fte impugned order. 4. Accordingiy, Itie impugned order dated 5«2^007 is set aside and quashed. Leamed triat Court is directed to consider the applicaUon of the petitioner fHed under Order 26 Rute 9 of the Code of Civit Procedure, in accordance with the obsefvattons made by this Court in paia -8 of the judgment and order dated 19^* December, 2006 in the case of Sunder Bai(supra), before prcceeding tbr disposal of the suit finaify. 5. In view ofttie foregoing, this pefition is attowed. CerHfied copy, as per Rutes. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge