.1— t«Nllllllll< ^tNIMluuli'1 COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Amit WMT PETITION (S} No. 704 of2008 Devendra Kumar Das S/o Late Shri D.K-Das, Aged about 38 years, Occupation: Sei-vice presently working as Assistant Grade IIL R/o Urban Weltare Csnter- Dallirajhara/ Cliiklialkasa, District Durg (C.G.) ^^ERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretaty Health & Faniily Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, Durg, District Durg(C.G.) 3. Block Mcdical Officer, Primar^- Heaith Center, Dondi, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETJITON UNDER ARTLCLE 226 QETHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hoii'ble SSiri Satish K. Agmhotn, J, Present: Shii R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Slm Alok Bakshi, Govenmieiit Advocate forthe State/respondeiits. ORAL ORDER (Passed 04fa ay of Febmary, 2008) 1. Tlie. petitioner, being aggrieved by the order dated 29.12,2007 (Asmexure P/I), whereby the petitioner has beenplaced from Primaw Health Center Chikhlakasa to Primaty Health C.enter Dondi, within the same Block, Dondi. 2. The petitioner challenges the validity ofthis order osi the grouBd that the petitioner was transferred earlier in December, 2006, .aiid agaisi afler aii year- he has been transfen'ed. There is no other grou'!id made out by the petitioner questiomng the validity ofthe transfer. 3, On reading ofthe order- it appears that the petitioner has been placed at other commimity health center within the same Block. Strictly speakmg, it camiot be termed as transfer. The petitioner has not challenged the validity ofthe impugied order on any permissible ^oimds i.e. malafidey vioiation ofmles and regulations or mcompetenice ofthe officer passmg the order. Thus, the petitions is not maintamable. It appears that this order has beeii passed in admimstrative exigency and in public interest. Thusy it does not warrant any interference with the impugiied order. 4. . Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. No order asto coBJts. Sd/- SatishK.A8"alotrl Judge