IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23487 of 2009 1. DAYANAND GOPE 2. RAM EKBAL GOPE @ RAM EKBAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.09.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of the Penal Code including section 307 and 379 IPC. The allegation is that petitioners and others arrived at the Khalihan of the informant armed with a licensed weapon. There was firing in the air. Subsequently, they committed theft of grains kept in the Khalihan. It is contended that on conclusion of investigation, the police did not find the allegation true and while not sending up the petitioners to stand trial a recommendation for initiation of prosecution for lodging a false accusation(s) was also made. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners abovenamed, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kumar D.Rajajee, J.M. Ist Class, Hilsa in connection with Chandi P.S.Case no.63/08 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with further condition that no sooner the case is taken up for trial, the petitioners shall appear on the date fixed in the trial. In case of 2 default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall have liberty to cancel their bail bonds. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )