IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No. 42578-M of 2007 Date of Decision: February 7,2008 Anu Khanna and another ........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms.Ishma Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Anter Singh Brar, DAG Punjab Mr.Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate for the complainant Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that till date, he has no instructions from the complainant as to whether he is ready and willing to take earnest money back. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioners failed to get the sale deed registered. According to the petitioners, the dispute is of civil nature. It is not disputed that the petitioners have already joined the investigation. Be that as it may, without commenting upon the merits of the controversy, interim bail already granted to the petitioners vide order dated 14.8.2007 is made absolute. Petition is disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) February 7, 2008 Judge arya