WP(C) 2916/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr B. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr J. Handique, learned state counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the NIT dated 30.4 .2010 issued by Executive Officer, Batadraba Anchalik Panchayat, Dhing, Nagaon f ixing the earnest money in some instances at 100%. Learned state counsel on instruction submits that due to the mistake occ urred in the NIT, the same was withdrawn, and on the same date a fresh NIT was i ssued fixing the earnest money required to be deposited by the intending tendere rs in respect of various markets. Learned counsel in support of his contention h as also placed on record a copy of the NIT, which is kept on record, reflecting the earnest money required to be deposited by the tenderers. It is further submi tted that Annexure-A NIT is the subsequent one issued by the anchalik panchayat. The petitioner has filed the present petition contending that for settle ment of the 5(five) markets, two NITs both dated 30.4.2010 were issued. In one N IT, the earnest money was fixed at an exorbitant rate, and in the other (Annexur e-A), the earnest money was fixed at a reasonable rate. According to the petitio ner, the NIT annexed as Annexure-A to the writ petition should be acted upon. Since the first NIT dated 30.4.2010 was withdrawn and the Annexure-A NIT was issued thereafter on the basis of which the process for settlement of marke ts is continuing, the grievance of writ petitioner is met. Hence, the writ petit ion is closed. No costs.