C.R.No.5579 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5579 of 2009. Decided on: September 24, 2009. Jai Singh and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Sish Ram and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Raman Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners submit that vide impugned order though the Court has held parties to be co-sharers but unnecessarily status quo regarding alienation of the property has been ordered causing prejudice to the rights of the defendants- petitioners but in the capacity a co-sharer has a right to sell the property to the extent of his share. On asking of the Court, counsel for the petitioner informs that the defendants-petitioners do not have any intention to sell the property. In view of the said circumstances, it is apparent that . . . 1 C.R.No.5579 of 2009 the impugned order directing the parties to maintain status quo regarding alienation of the property will not prejudice the rights of the petitioners. No ground is made out for interference. However, it is clarified that in case the defendants- petitioners, at any stage, intend to sell their share in the property in dispute, it will be open to them to move an application disclosing the name of the prospective vendee and to sell the property after necessary intimation/permission from the trial Court. Petitioners will be required to furnish the details to the Court in case they mortgage their property for securing any loan With the above observations, the petition is disposed of in limine. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 24, 2009. rka . . . 2