31 # % 13.12.2010 Present: Ms. Suman Chauha:q, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State along with ASI Sat Mohan, P.S. Prasad 'Nagar. Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person. + Crl. 3852/2010 * Petitioners and respondent no.2 are neighbors. On the complaint of respondent no.2, FIR in question was registered against the petitioners. It was alleged in the FIR that petitioners had forcibly snatched mobile phone. Now, petitioners and respondent no.2 have resolved their dispute amicably, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relations with each other in future being the neighbors. Terms of settlement have been incorporated in the Settlement Deed dated 2nct August, 2010 (Annexure B at page nos. 12 to 14). Respondent no.2, who is present in court, states that he has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Since both the parties have resolved their dispute->amicably, no fruitful purpose would be served in compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. Accordingly, in larger interest, FIR No. 87/2010 under Sections 356/379/411 registered at Police Station Signing Date:03.08.2024 17:21:43 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Prasad Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. DECEMBER 13, 2010 ga A.K. PATHAK, J.