IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 9150 of 2008(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KADEEJABI, W/O.ABU, AGED 60, MATHILAKATH HOUSE, II/340, WARD NO.7 (NEW), MUTHUVATTOOR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU. BY MR.P.JACOB VARGHESE, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS.MR.VARUGHESE M EASO, MR.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J, MR.P.J.VINOD JOSEPH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. ABOOBACKER, W/O.ABU, AGED 60, THERUVATHU HOUSE, WARD NO.7 (NEW), MUTHUVATTOOR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU. 2. PATHUMOL, W/O.ABOOBACKER, AGED 56, THERUVATHU HOUSE, WARD NO.7 (NEW), MUTHUVATTOOR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU. 3. SHAMIR, S/O.ABOOBACKER, AGED 27, THERUVATHU HOUSE, WARD NO. 7 (NEW), MUTHUVATTOOR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU. 4. CHAVAKKADU MUNICIPALITY, CHAVAKKADU, THRISSUR. 5. C.I. OF POLICE, CHAVAKKADU. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.N.P.SAMUEL, R4 BY MR.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV.MR.S.SUJIN,SC,CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, ADV. SRI. RAJIT, R5 BY BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.9150/2008-L: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. 77/07 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHAVAKKADU. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT IN O.S. 77/07 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHAVAKKADU. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN O.S. 77/07 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHAVAKKADU. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT. 23/11/07 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DT. 13/02/08. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 28/02/08 BEFORE R.4. BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE PLAINT DT. 25/02/08 BEFORE SUB COURT, THRISSUR. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION (C).7575/08 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 07/03/08 IN W.P.(C).7575/08 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P.10: COPY OF THE NEW REPORT DT. 08/03/08 IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY. EXT.P.11: COPY OF THE NEWS REPORT DT. 08/03/08 IN MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY. EXT.P.12: TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R1.A: ROUGH SKETCH SHOWING THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS. EXT.R1.B: COPY OF THE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. EXT.R1.C: COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT B.A. NO. 166/07-08 DTD. 15/11/07 ISSUED BY CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY. EXT.R1.D: COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH IN O.S. 259/08 OF THE SUB COURT, THRISSUR DTD. 29/03/08. EXT.R1.E: COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CR. NO. 71/07 DTD. 07/02/07 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION. EXT.R1.F: COPY OF THE FIR IN CR. NO. 382/07 DTD. 16/06/07 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION. EXT.R1.G: COPY OF THE FIR IN CR.NO.181/08 DTD. 03/03/08 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION. EXT.R1.H: COPY OF THE FIR IN CR. NO. 205/08 DTD. 08/03/08 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION. W.P.(C). NO.9150/2008-L: EXT.R1.(I): COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER IN I.A. NO. 425/07 & I.A. NO. 1888/2008 IN O.S. NO. 77/2007 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, CHAVAKKAD DTD. 04/09/2008. EXT.R1.(J): COPY OF THE ORDER E2 (SUIT) – 8623/07 DTD. 09/01/2009 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY – (R4 IN W.P.C). EXT.R4.A: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE R.4. TO THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVAKKAD ON 08/03/2008. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.9150/2008-L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The main relief sought for in the writ petition is for a writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos.4 and 5 to prevent construction as per Ext.P5 stop memo and to remove the constructions already made. 2. The learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submitted that the petitioner herein has filed a writ petition as W.P.(C).No.27502/2009 with regard to the very same subject matter, wherein leaving open the remedy of the petitioner to seek relief from the competent Civil Court the writ petition was dismissed. 3. In the light of the above, it is upto the petitioner to seek remedies before the Civil Court in the light of the pending disputes between the parties. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms