THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:3465 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 08.02.2010, in I.A.No.348 of 2009 in O.S.No.64 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the learned Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Nellore, wherein the said application ﬁled by the petitioner herein under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the claim application seeking enhancement of the compensation amount from Rs.15,00,000/- to Rs.25,00,000/-, was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the records. 3. Petitioner herein ﬁled the claim application claiming compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 02.06.2004. Out of the said amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, as seen from the claim application, Rs.13,00,000/- was claimed towards medical expenses, special diet, transport expenses and attendant charges; Rs.1,00,000/- towards pain and suﬀering and Rs.1,00,000/- towards permanent disability. As against the claim of Rs.13,00,000/- towards medical expenses etc., it appears the claimant has submitted medical bills showing expenditure of only Rs.6895.70 ps as seen from the impugned order. The learned District Judge has therefore considered it inappropriate to permit the proposed amendment by enhancing the claim amount from Rs.15,00,000/- to Rs.25,00,000/- on the whims and fancies of the claimant. The claimant has already claimed an amount of Rs.15,00,000/-. According to him, subsequent to ﬁling of the petition he underwent some surgery and incurred some expenditure. In the aﬃdavit, ﬁled in support of the application, no particulars have been furnished as to the nature of the surgery undergone or the name of the hospital where the surgery has taken place or the amount of expenditure incurred in connection with the surgery. The aﬃdavit ﬁled in support of the application is vague and bereft of the necessary particulars that justify the proposed enhancement. Under those circumstances, the Tribunal has rightly dismissed the application for amendment of the claim application seeking huge enhancement of the claim from Rs.15,00,000/- to Rs.25,00,000/-, without any basis. The claimant is however at liberty to seek amendment, if need be, on proof of actual expenditure incurred by him for the surgeries he claimed to have undergone subsequent to ﬁling of the petition at an appropriate stage during the course of enquiry. The impugned order, dismissing the application for amendment, does not however call for any interference. 4. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. ______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J 30th November, 2011. Tsy