1 cra1023-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL REIVISION APPLICATION NO. 1023 OF 2010 Virendra N. Hajam .. Applicant V/s. Shyamudda Ramdev Hajam & Ors. .. Respondents .... Mr. R. A. Thorat for the Applicant. Mr. V. T. Lullia for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant on instructions of the applicant states that the applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits. He, however, prays that considering the facts that the applicant is occupying the suit premises from the year 1965, longer time to vacate be granted subject to filing usual undertaking. The learned counsel appearing for the first to third respondents opposed the prayer for grant of time. 2. The applicant has made a statement that he is not pressing 2 cra1023-10 the revision application. Therefore, the decree for possession will attain finality. He has shown willingness to file usual undertaking to vacate. Hence, time to vacate deserves to be granted till 31st May, 2012. The revision application is disposed of by passing the following order : :: O R D E R :: i. Revision application is dismissed as not pressed. ii. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, decree for possession shall not be executed till 31st May, 2012, subject to the applicant filing usual undertaking in this Court to vacate the suit premises. iii. If undertaking is not filed within a period of four weeks from today, the decree for possession will become executable forthwith. JUDGE 3 cra1023-10