1 973.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 973 OF 2011 Dr.(Mrs.) Janki Subramanian. ... Appellant. V/s. The Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai. ... Respondent. Y.K.Tiwari with S.K.Rai i/b. M/s.K.P.Tiwari & Co. for the appellant. Ms.K.K.Soran for the respondent. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 16th November 2011. P.C. : The appeal from order can be disposed of by permitting the appellant to tender a proposal for regularisation of construction as contemplated by section 53(3) of Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 and directing the respondent Corporation to consider the same in accordance with the provisions of law. It is contended by the appellant that such an application has already been made on 17th September 2010, however, the same has not yet been considered. The appellant shall have liberty to tender a fresh application along with all necessary documents and Architect’s certification along with plan within a period of four weeks from today. In the event of presentation of such application to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposals (E.S.), B.M.C., Vikhroli, the concerned authority shall decide the same within 2 973.11-ao a period of six weeks thereafter. In the event of passing of any adverse order against the appellant, no coercive action shall be taken for a period of three weeks thereafter to enable the appellant to challenge the said order. During the pendency and disposal of the proposal for regularisation, the respondent- Corporation shall not take any coercive action against the appellant and for further period of three weeks in the event of passing any adverse order against the appellant. 2. Counsel for the appellant makes a statement that he would instruct his client to withdraw the suit. 3. Appeal from order is disposed of. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)