:"^^i^^^^^^^^^^.: S'K%SS*< (-f \0Ql^- IN TBE BBGH COURT OF CHHATTBSGARH AT mLASlPUK W.P. (s) No. ...7.rT.L.......^200 / PETITIONER : \er^ Shfv Kumar Shrma S/b. Shri •••;^\ Ramlal shrma Aged about 47 ^...^'c,^.-' . yeaRS Post - Assistant Teacher •^•^'^>y.-•"'" Govt- primary School Cfairchari kurdh, Block Churia, Distt. Rajnandgaon. (C.G.) ft'<-l"tf..-1-" ..•••'\.A:;;"\^•"" •"'A<;\bx.-'' ^y.^ ^<^---" RESPQNQENTS : 1: VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretaiy Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) "^t..\< <^^. ^y^.\2^ ^District Education Officer, 4y* \^> '' ^cS^ Chhuria, District Rajnandgaon ^' (C.G.) \b .^ 0-1 3; Chhuria District - Rajxiandgaon (C.G.) WRTT PETITION U/A 226/277 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OFIProiAFORISSCANCEOF WBITSINTHE NATURE QF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORAfiI AND FOR OTHER SMTABLE WMTS AND DffiECTIONS The petitionfir named above most humbly and rfispsctfully begs to submitas under:- HI6H COURTOF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LEBENCH : HON-BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PFTmON fS.) N0. 4W OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Siddharth Choure State of Chhorttisgarh and others WRTT PETmON fS.1 N0. 466 OF 2M7 Petjtigner versus Resoondents Panch Rom 5ahu State of Chhatl'isgarh and others WRTT PETTTrON IS) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Manhamn Lal Prthaura State of Chhattisgarh ond ol+iers WftTTPETmON (S.) N0. 468 OF 2007 Petjtioner versus Resoondents Yaggaya Dgtta Baghel Stoite of Chhatl-isgarh and o-thers WMT TIQNfS.lNO. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Shikx Khaperckiy State of Chherttisgarh ond olhers WRTT PFTmON (S.) N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitiener Resoondents versus Rodhey Kishun Pfftel State of Chhatt'isgarh ond olhers WRTT PFTmON (5.1 N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner : AAnnganLul versus Respondents : State of Chhuttisgarh and o-thers WRTT PFTmON IS.) N0. 472 OF 2QQ7 PetitLoner Respondents versus Dhal Singh Sonwoni State of Chhattisgnrh and o'thers WRTT PETmON tS.) N0. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner : Onkar Ldl Sonboir versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 474_OfL2M7 Petitjoner Respondents 'wrsys Shiv Kumar Sharma State of Chhattisgarti and others WRTT PFTmON (5.1 N0. 47B OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus ftajendro Kumar Sagar State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers Petitioner WRIT PETmON (5.1 N0. 476 OF 2007 Makhanhl Thakur versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and olhers L- ^,"1' \ WRIT PFTmON (S.^ N0. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner verais Resoondents Foot Cheuid Kamlediwar Storte of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETTTrON (S.) N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner wrsys Respondents Rajendro Kumar Oewungan State of Chhatl-i^arh and otiiers And WRTT PETTTtON (S.l N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner ftespondents versus Joyant Kumar Shendey S'tate of Chhatt'isgarh ond o-thers Prewnt : Mr. ft.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. 5ushit Dubey, Sowmment Advocate for the State/reqiondents. OROER (Rassed on 24th Ocy of Januory. 2007) 1. Leamed counsel eppearmp for -the petitioners as well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearing for the State/respondents jointly submit that •the fccts and question of tow involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwmri- Kumw Bheitwdwoj v». Mwdelpal Cai'popfflton. t>urs eawl aiwth*^. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2008 (iSapesfi Kumar (^OTnovs. 7%»5tof«ffiwf. of ChhaHlymii anrf cuwrtiMt) and o-ther connected matters, decided by -rtiis S| /^. Court- on 15-12-2006, purawnt to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by •the Secretary. Bonrd of Secondary Education. Bhopal cnd the prospectus of Diploma m Educatron Examination, it wss clarified -that the nomenckiture of the Basic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chonged and renamed as Diploma in Eduart-ion, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, -the D.Ed. Cerl-ificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSapesh Kumar Vermaw. Jfie S'tate Govt. of Oihattisgarh wid orwlhei) (Supra). 3. For •the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwcnt Kumar ffiaradwaj\Supfv}, subject to verification of the fact as to whelher the petitioners have acquired B.T.L/b.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circukirs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 ond further vAether -they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be ptaced on Ihe recprd of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 Z006CII)(M>,TR-C696 Thakur