IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 26890 of 2011(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SIMI P.S., AGED 30 YEARS, W/O.RUPESH C.N., VAISAKH, VETTIKAVALA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SYAM J SAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP. BY SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD CENTRAL SCHOOL, VETTIKAVALA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. RAJI, PUTHENPURAYIL VEEDU, VETTIKAVALA, NOW WORKING AS PRE-PRIMARY TEACHER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOL, VETTIKAVALA. ADDL.R5: THE CHAIRMAN, CBSE, REGIONAL OFFICE NO.2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREETHI VIHAR, DELHI, PIN-110092. (ADDL. R5 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IA 19915/2011 DT.13.12.2011) ADV. SRI.G.BIJU FOR R1 & R3 R2 BY G.P. SHRI M.A. FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE DATED 15/6/2011 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 13/7/2011 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT TAKEN IN THE NAME OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20/9/2011 PREFERRED TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT THROUGH THIRD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL P.S. TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 26890 of 2011-I - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of December, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent to regularise the petitioner in the third respondent's school in pursuance of Ext.P2 list, after considering Ext.P3. The case of the petitioner in the writ petition is that the petitioner had earlier worked as a Pre-primary School Teacher and later as a temporary Clerk in the Central School managed by the first respondent Devaswom Board. It appears that the petitioner was working as a Clerk in a leave vacancy. 2. In the statement filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, the allegations raised in the writ petition have been denied. The averment in the writ petition that the petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs.50,000/-, is denied by the Devaswom Board in para 5 of the statement. It is also pointed out that the petitioner was asked not to deposit any amount and misusing his position as a temporary clerk, she created manipulations in the official documents. 3. I am not going into the disputed questions herein. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the petitioner may be given liberty to WPC.26890/2011 - 2- move the Central Board of Secondary Education in the matter. With liberty to do so, the writ petition is closed. It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the case pleaded by the respective parties herein. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/