IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8706 of 2009 MUKHTAR SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 27.07.2009 Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner who has filed the present writ application in a representative capacity is that the centre for Anganbari is being shifted from the village of the petitioner without following due procedure and process in this regard merely because the complaint had been made against the Anganbari Sevika. Shifting the centre may not be an answer because that may amount to throwing the baby with the bathtub. In absence of any materials before this court and the circumstances, the petitioner will be well advised to approach the concerned authority i.e. Child Development Project Officer, Lauria, in the district of West Champaran. He shall take any appropriate decision for shifting the centre in accordance with law and shall take appropriate action against the Anganbari Sevika if so advised. The writ application stands disposed of with the above liberty. Bibhash (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)