IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.918 of 2007 BINAY MODI (SAHU) @ BINAY KUMAR MODI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 22.10.2008 KHAN In the instant writ petition the petitioner prays that the case being Rupauli (Tikaptti) P.S. Case No.50 of 2007 be supervised by the Superintendent of Police, Purnea. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case being Rupauli (Tikaptti) P.S. Case No.50 of 2007 under sections 376, 201 and 313 of the Penal Code has been registered against him. He submits that falsity of the allegation would appear from the fact that the case has been lodged after delay of 3-4 years. Learned counsel for the State submits that the Superintendent of Police, Purnea has himself supervised the case and found the allegations to be true. In the aforesaid circumstances, this court is of the view that no further direction is to be passed directing the Superintendent of Police, Purnea to supervise the case. However, it would be open to the petitioner to pursue his remedy as available in law. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)