1 wp9675-10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9675/2010 Shri Pandit s/o Vithal Bhoi and another .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents .... Mr.V.B.Patil,Adv.for petitioners. Mr.V.B.Ghatge,AGP for respondent-State. Miss.M.G.Purnapatre,Adv.for respondent no.3 ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL AND T.V.NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER ,2011 ORAL JUDGMENT 1] We have perused the order passed by this Court on 13/10/10. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions as to whether the amount due has been paid to the respondent no.3. The learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 on instructions submits that the amount due to respondent no.3 has not been paid by the petitioner. 2 wp9675-10.odt 2] In the light of the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 and in the facts of the case, no interference is warranted in the extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. Writ Petition is rejected. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. (T.V.NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.) umg/wp9675-10