CWP No. 10060 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10060 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: August 10, 2010 Joginder Singh Aulakh and others .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and another ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of what has been stated in para no. 3 of the written statement (preliminary objections), the matter has been rendered infructuous. 2. Para no. 3 of the written statement (preliminary objections) reads as under:- “3. That all the petitioners had filed earlier CWP No. 19545 of 2007 which was disposed of by this Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 3.11.2008. It is further submitted that in compliance with above said ordered the seniority list of PES (School and Inspection) Group A has been finalized and officer belong to this cadre and Senior Most in District have been posted as District CWP No. 10060 of 2009 2 Education Officer in all the District of State of Punjab. A copy whereof is annexed as Annexure R-1. Hence, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Moreover, this Hon'ble Court while adjudicating CWP No. 18141 of 2007 titled as Gurdev Sing Gill versus State of Punjab has held that the present petition is rendered in fructuous on the same ground that the petitioner is Senior Most from amongst the State Cadre in District Bathinda.” 3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 10.08.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?