i^ ^r^K^ ^a-l^ ^-^^^^ l^ ^^5a,. ^60 A6&-" ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Singtg Bencfc' M.A. No^^ /2006 n^ APPELLANTS 0EFENDANTS ^- 2, /"" ^ ^-o- ^^ ,oi- -% ,^ 0^'" RESPONDENTS ^—1 BLAINTIFFS -> RESPONDENT DEFENDANT N0.1 <2- Shekhuram, S/o. Nirmal Lodhi; aged about 40 years; Teekam, S/o. Nirmal Lodhi; aged about 35 years; Both are -R/o. Village Belgaon; Tahsil Chhuikhadan. Banvali, S/o. Dalitram Lodhi; aged about 22 years, R/o. Tendubhatha; Tahsil- Chhuikhadan. VERSUS Smt. Kimtibai, W/o. Bhagoli Ram Verma; aged about 55 years,; R/o. Village Tendubhata; Tahsil Chhuikhadan; District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Uderam, S/o. Bhikhari Ram Lodhi; aged about 75 years wrongly shown 95 years. R/o. Tendubhata [Wrongly shown TunduBhatta] State of Chhattisgarh; through Collecfor, Rajnandgaon. RESPONDENT D.EFENDANT N0.5 MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 4~3 RULE Kr); OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908. SII^I^I ft'ii'* s^y ?t)^ 'yfs^t Sahu 'S^i 't\w\v\^, wx&ww, hwwy. 3TRt?T '<T^? ||AA-"^ ^ 111CTI -g^q;-——••————•••••——••"g^ 200 •IN^T' sii^iTOTCiT^ifer S.B. Hon'ble ShriJustice N.K, 13.01.2010 Shri Manoj Chouhan, Advc}cate Shri Prafull Bharat and Stli respondent No. 1. Shri Sameer Behar, Panel| Learned counsel appeaf permission of this court to withdr^w this Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal order asto costs. Consequently, M(C)P No. °bwf<'i''ii-< ii'K-ffii'fe^t <r"i<$i< ^; sif:a*l an^r ^aarwal for the appellants. ri Rakesh Thakur, Advocates for Lawyerfor State. ing for the appellants seeks iwthisappeal. t is dismissed as withdrawn. No 1025/06stands disposed of. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge