^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0.15 Of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Sanjay Sarathi, Aged 26 years, S/o Shri B.S. Sarathi, Address C.S.E.B. Coiony, Patharripara, Korba Versus 1 Ghanshyam Rathore, C/o S. Singh, Imtipara, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 Regionai Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 Regional Transport Authority, Ambikapur, District Surguja 4 Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Ambikapur 5 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ghari Chowk, Raipur WRIT PETSTION UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Anshul R.Shrivastava, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No.2, 3 & 4. ORAL ORDER (06.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. Petitioner-Sanjay Sarathi, who is also petitioner in Revision Petition No.132/2009 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT), Raipur, has filed this petition against the order dated 10.11.2009 passed by the STAT, by which, an applicatlon for grant of stay has been dismissed. A perusal of the order would show that the revision filed by the petitloner was time barred and an application for condonation of deiay was filed. The Tribunal vide the impugned WRIT PETITION (227) N0.15 Qf 2010 ^ common order condoned the delay in fiiing the revision and after admitting the revision and after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, directed for its final hearing on 13.11.2009 and has dismissed the interim application for grant of stay. The Tribunal has considered all the aspects while rejecting the said appiication filed by the petitioner. 1 do not find any reason to interfere with the order of rejection of stay application passed bythe Tribunal. The petition has no merit. The same is tiable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- ,Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge shyna