THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3271 of 2009 ORDER: This C.R.P. is directed against judgment dated 09.06.2009 passed in R.A.No.155 of 2007 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, confirming order of eviction dated 20.07.2007 passed in R.C.No.127 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Rent Controller, Secunderabad. The petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord. The respondent herein filed R.C.No.127 of 2006 under Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960, seeking eviction of the petitioner herein on the ground of willful default in payment of rent. The Rent Controller, having considered the oral and documentary evidence available on record, on 20.07.2007 allowed the R.C. directing the petitioner to vacate and handover vacant possession of the schedule premises within a period of three months from the date of that order. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred R.A.No.155 of 2007, which was dismissed by order dated 09.06.2009 giving two months time to the petitioner to vacate the schedule premises. Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the material available on record, especially the judgments of the Courts below, I am of the opinion that the concurrent findings of the Courts below do not warrant interference by this Court. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit of the petitioner in USR No.1141 of 2009, whereby the petitioner undertook to vacate the schedule premises within one year in case of rejection of this revision. In view of the above, recording the undertaking of the petitioner, the C.R.P. is disposed of giving one year time from today to the petitioner to vacate and handover vacant possession of the schedule premises to the respondent. No order as to costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI, J 07th August, 2009 GHN