IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32835 of 2008 1. PRAMOD NATT 2. Manoj Natt, both are sons of Deonath Natt, residents of village Hussaini P.S. Dumariya Ghat, District East Champaran … … Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioners: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh For the State:Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 6. 22.1.2009 Heard. The two petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code which relates to robbing of the informant and his companions of money, passbook, etc. besides, the receipts for having unloaded the sugarcane in a particular Sugarcane Mill. The two petitioners were put on T.I. Parade and two witnesses Suresh Pandey and Braj Kishroe Singh were invited to participate in it for identifying the suspects and accordingly both of them identified the two petitioner and one Sakal Paswan. The contention is that accused Sheonath Rai from whose possession there was recovery of the looted cash has been admitted 2 to bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 40518 of 2008. A copy of the order passed in the above noted Cr. Misc. has been produced before me and on perusal of the same I find that the Hon’ble Judge was never allowed to have his Lordship access to the fact of recovery or any incriminating circumstance as is presently placed before this Bench. Regard being had to the fact that the two petitioners carry two identifications, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioners on bail. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)