IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21064 of 2010 1. SHANKAR SAH 2. GANESH SAH, BOTH SONS OF LATE JAGDEO SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-NONIA PATTI, P.O.NAWGACHHIYA, P.S. NAWGACHHIYA, DISTT. BHAGALPUR. -PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR- --OPP.PARTY 2 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners, who are named accused in this case, on some suspicion carry allegation that they are the persons who got the shop of the informant under flame. The informant himself got an information on telephone through one Chhotu, as it appears from order of the Sessions Judge that in paragraph 8 of the case diary he has said that at the request of petitioner no.1 he has informed the informant about the mishappening. Nothing appears from the order showing direct involvement of the petitioners under the wrong committed. Considering the facts and circumstances, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on 2 each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in Rail Bihpur (Nawgachhiya) P.S. Case no.4 of 2010 (R) ; G.R. no. 16 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for one year or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad