IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 14012/2008 Decided on:24.2.2011 _____________________________________________ Bhawna Sathi. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is not in dispute that present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, titled as Nek Ram and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.11.2009. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner in view of the principles laid down by this Court in 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 the judgment dated 17.11.2009, as noticed above, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 24.2.2011 *awasthi*