1 ’ ‘ 311wm (Wu) mmm WW§WW am’mm (Single Bench; Hon‘ble Mr. Justice Dhir-endm Mish‘m) Writ Pe‘l'i‘l'ion s! No.566/O9 (Pe’ri’rion under Art226 of Constitution of India) h u PEFITIONER Ba r Ram, S/o (Late) Bajr'u Ram’ Aged ' 3—9 ears, R/o Village Dhaur'atikr'a, P.O. Baik nthpur, District Koria, 6.6. y 30. 1 . 2009 - Mr. Manoj Dubey, Advocat for the petitioner. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Law er for the State. The petitioner by the i stant petition is praying for a irection to the respondents to ake payment of unpaid wages of d for a direction to the responden s to cease ille9al cessation of the petitioner‘s work. the petitioner froéi OctoBér, 2 07 till date. He has also praye d RESPONDENTS 1. tate of Chhattisgarh, Through ' ecretar-y,‘ Department of Finance, antaralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. irector, Directorate of Treasury ccounts and Pensions, Raipur' hhattisgarh). 3. oint Director, Directorate of reasury Accounts and Pensions, aipur (Chhattisgarh). 4. istrict Treasury Officer, Koriya, aikunthpur District Koriya, 6.6. 5. ollector, District Koriya/ aikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) / (SinQIe Bench: Hon‘ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mish‘ra) Wri‘l' Pe1'i1'ion s| No.566/09 (Pe’rifion under Art226 of ConsTiTuTion of India) h u ,PETITIONER Ba r‘ Ram, 5/0 (Lafe) Bajr'u Ram, Aged 3—9 ears, R/o Village Dhaur'a‘rikr‘a, P.O. Baik n‘rhpur, Dis‘rr‘icf Koriya, C.G. REsPONDENTS ‘ . 1. ra‘re of Chhaf‘risgar'h, Through ‘ cr‘efur‘y,‘ Depur‘fmenf of Finance, m‘amlaya, Raipur‘ (C.G.) irecfor, DirectoraTe of Treasury coun'rs and Pensions, Raipur‘ ha'r’risgar‘h). in‘r Director, DirecTora‘re of easury Accounts and Pensions, ipur (Chhaf‘risgarh). isfric’r Treasury Officer, Koriya, ikun‘i’hpur DisfricT Koriya, C.6. llecTor, Dis’rric‘r Koriya, ikum‘hpur, Dis’rricf Koriya (C.G.) 30. 1 . 2009 Mr. Manoj Dubey, Advoca'l’ for The peTiTioner. Mr‘s. Smifa Ghai, Panel Law er‘ for The STafe. The pefifioner by ’rhe isfan‘r pe’ri’rion is praying for a direction fo The respondents ’ro ake paymen’r of unpaid wages of fhe peti’rioner froéi ocioBér, 2 O7 fill da’re. He has also prayed for a 'direc’rion To ’rhe responden s ’ro cease illegal cessaTion of il'he pe’rii‘ioner's work. ‘ e a c o h r a a o a mm 7 _ W200 mm(§I§a§u) mmm WW§§€TW awfmanéw - mm ................1H . 2oo mm (W) WWW ’- Z,_/ WW§WW $simm ' Grievance of ’rhe pefi’rionerr is Thaf he was appoinTed on daily wages a’r Collec’rora’re mfe for a period of 89 days. $ubsequenfly, ’rhe above period was exfended rom Time fo Time and ulfimafely the pe‘ri‘rioner's appoin‘l’men’r wa made for unfil further orders. However, The peTiTioner was noT llowed To puT his signaTure in The aTTendance regisTer from The , onTh of April, 2008 Though The respondenTs are exTracTing The w rk from The peTiTioner even now. I have heard learned counsel for The parTies. So far as The relief claimed by The peTiTioner under Clause 10.3 of The peTiTion is concerned, since The peTiTioner's appoinfmenT was noT' on The regular basis afTei following due process of law, The same cannoT be granTed. However, if The peTiTioner files represenTaTion before for his inpaid wages before respondenT No.4—DisTricT Treasury Officer, Koriya, The same may be considered by respondenT No.4 i1 accordance wiTh law afTer due verificaTion. WiTh The aforesaid observaTion & direcTion, The peTiTion is disposed of. CerTified c py as per'rules. v Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra , r f . - Judge