Criminal Misc.-M No.17004 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.17004 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 09.08.2011 Angrej Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that though the petitioners have been named in the FIR but no specific injuries have been attributed to them. The FIR was registered on the complaint of Darshan Singh. In his supplementary statement, petitioner No.1 has been attributed one injury on his knee as he was merely carrying a danda. As far as petition- ers No.2 and 3 are concerned, no injury has been attributed to them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that six accused in the present case have already been arrested. He further submitted that Varinder Singh Soni on the side of petitioner No.1, caused firearm injuries, which were found on left leg and lower part of left thigh but still cross ver- sion was not registered. The petitioners have already moved a petition seek- ing direction to the police authority to register their cross version. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that the allegations against the petitioners made in the FIR are gen- eral in nature. The petitioners were present at the time of alleged occur- rence. After specific allegations against Ranjit Singh, Varinder Singh Soni, Gurbax Singh and Sukhwant Singh, there were general allegations that all Criminal Misc.-M No.17004 of 2011 2 other accused had caused injuries to the complainant. He further submitted that petitioner No.2 was involved in two other cases earlier and has been ac- quitted. There are two other cases pending against petitioner No.3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the injuries attributed to petitioner No.1 in the supplementary statement of the injured, who initially got the FIR registered, is on the knee and he was carrying a danda as stated in the FIR and no injury has been at- tributed to petitioners No.2 and 3 as stated in the FIR and in the supplemen- tary statement, they are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 19.08.2011 at 10.00 a.m. and in case of arrest, they shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as con- tained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 09.08.2011 sharmila