IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 266 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 266 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 266 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 223 OF 2008 Ganesh Gaurishankar Gupta .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ...... Respondent. Shri K.S.Patil for the applicant Shri J.P. Yagnik APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP. The applicant has ben convited for the offence punishable under section 354 of IPC and sentenced to suffer R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default to suffer R.I.for four months. The applicant has been acquitted for offence punishable under section 3(1)(X) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act 1989. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was on bail during the trial and even after conviction, he has been released on bail till the expiry of the appeal period, The learned cousel has submitted that it is most unlikely that the appeal would come up for hearing before the expiry of sentence. In the result, I direct that the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail during trial on executing fresh bail bond. Application is disposed of. ....