1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 489 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 489 OF 2011 *** 1. Advocate Mr. Zarekar for Respondent No.1 Consumer has pointed out that the society here had challenged the very same order of District Consumer Forum in Writ Petition No. 7654 of 2010 on very same grounds and, therefore, this Court should not interfere. Shri Thorat points out that, that petition was withdrawn by society and as personal action against the committee members is not permitted by law interference in the writ petition is warranted. 2. The petitioners, though not parties to earlier petition, society had taken a chance of obtaining a verdict in their favour by raising similar contentions. Filing of that petition specifically for the same purpose and its failure is not disclosed in this writ petition. I am, therefore, not inclined to entertain this petition. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 489 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. With liberty to petitioner to file appeal under section 15 of Consumer Protection Act, present writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:22/03/2011. ans/489