1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6364 OF 2009 1. Ramchandra S/o Rajaram Narwate } Age : 70 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Narsingwadi, U/v Lohara, } Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur. } 2. Narayan S/o Rajaram Narwate } Age : 56 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Narsingwadi, U/v Lohara, } Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur. } 3. Bhagwan S/o Rajram Narwate } Age : 50 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Narsingwadi, U/v Lohara, } Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur. } 4. Mahadeo S/o Rajram Narwate } Age : 45 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Narsingwadi, U/v Lohara, } Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur. } 5. Dnyanoba S/o Rajram Narwate } Age : 35 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Narsingwadi, U/v Lohara, } Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur. } 6. Vithabai W/o Rajram Narwate } Age : 95 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Narsingwadi, U/v Lohara, } Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur. } .... PETITIONERS V E R S U S 2 Kashinath S/o Gundappa Patne } Age : 35 Years, Occ. Agriculture, } R/o : Lohara, Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur } .... RESPONDENT Mr. Milind M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. S.V.Chandole holding for Mr. V.G.Sakolkar, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 11/12/2009 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. The only limited grievance of the petitioners is that an Order dated 24/6/2009 issuing attachment warrant under Order XXI Rule 43 of Code of Civil Procedure has been issued against petitioners without considering the objection of the petitioners to the main execution proceedings itself to the effect that it is filed beyond the period of limitation. 3. Mr. Chandole, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that the execution proceedings in fact is within limitation. 3 4. However, I find that the learned trial court was not justified in issuing the attachment warrant directly without deciding preliminary objection regarding maintainability on the ground of limitation. 5. Rule is, therefore, made absolute by quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 24/6/2009. The learned trial court is directed to decide the objection of the petitioner regarding maintainability of the execution proceedings. [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE knp/WP6364.09