IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8358 of 2010() ---------------------------------- CRMP.3880/2010 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD CRIME NO. 524/2010 OF PUDUNAGARAM POALICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. .................... APPLICATS/ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 15 ----------------------------------------- 1. SIVAN AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. MUTHU, NEDUMPALLOM HOUSE, VANDITHAVALAM, THITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.GANGADHARAN, VANAVAMPPADOM HOUSE, NANNIYODE CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. DINESH, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. RAJAN, NEDUMPALLOM HOUSE, VANDITHAVALAM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKD DISTRICT. 4. SUMESH, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.ARUMUDHAN, PANAMTHUVARA CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. SUNILKUMAR, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN KAITHARAVU,CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. JAYAPRAKASH, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. THEYYUNNI, PATTIKULAM NANNIYODE CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7. VIJAYAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.VELUNNY EANTHALPADAM, NANNIYODE CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8. SURESH AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.GOPALAN, KIZHAKKEKADU KANNIMARI, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. Svs/ .........2/-... ...2... B.A.8358/2010 9. RAVEENDRAN, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.VASU, PATTIKULAM NANNIYODE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 10. RATHEESH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.CHANDRAN KIZHAKKEKADU KANNIMARI, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 11. KANDAMUTHAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.KUPPAN, KIZHAKKEKADU, KANNIMARI,CHITTUR TALUK PALAKKAD DISTRICT 12. SURESH BABU, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.KASU, KIZHAKKEKADU, KANNIMARI, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 13. SURENDRAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. KASU, KIZHAKKEKADU, KANNIMARI, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 14. DEVDAS, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O. AANDY, THARAKANCHALLA, NANNIYODE CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKD DISTRICT. 15. DAS, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, PATTIKULAM, DEFEDRCHALLA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING THE S.I., PUDUNAGARA POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8358 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 ORDER In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, who are accused Nos.11 to 16, 8, 17 to 21, 23, 22 & 24 in Crime No.524 of 2010 of Pudunagaram Police Station, Palakkad, for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 283, 294(b), 353, 332 & 308 read with Section 149 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 30/11/2010. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioners, the present stage of investigation of the case and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail with effect from 30/12/2010 on each of them executing a bond for `15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and subject to the Bail Appln.No.8358/2010 : 2 : following conditions:- 1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. 2. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report. 3. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj