U ’‘S LASPUR ‘ Manoj Kumar Shrivastava S/o. Shri Hanuman Pragaci Siuivastavm ageé about — 35 years, R/o. ~ iilage Pagden T0121? Tahsil sinnour, Distt. Rewa : V (M.P.) VERSUS : . Chairman, Coa¥ India Ltd 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (WBJ Director: (P.&.IR), Coai India Ltd., 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata W ) 3, mnber Secretary, JBCIXII (Joint Bhoatfite Cannmrte for The Coal h1dustry), Coal Indi‘a Ltd. H), Netaj Suhash Road, o‘ikata (W.B.\ Chaimlan-cum-Managitig Director, S.EIC.L. Heaci Qtr. Seapat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Chkf Generai Manager, Hasciev Area, Ledri, Distt. Armypur, (MR) ) ‘*‘‘Ui‘10N OF INDIA ’ ) 1K n $ Piesent: Shri Rah' Mishra. Advacate for the oetitioner i Praveen Das, Advocate for the régponden. No. 4 and 5. Shr t (Pasged on 2 day of Januar, 2008) 1 f p s simarly situated to that ofthe respondents in the matter of Chairman, is i1 Centrei Coaitielos Ltd. & Others Vs . Ji 'veodra ¥rasad Tiwari & Others Civii Appea No. .114 of 2007). Learned counse filxther submits that ( l 7 l the said Civii Appea has been disposed of Vide order dated 29th March, i 2007. passeri by the Hon’bie Supreme Court of Inéia. Learned counsel iimher submits that this case may also he disposed ofin the same terms. 2. In View of the above, the petition stands disposed of in the same terms. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1.,eamed counsel appearing or the etitioner ubmiis that ihe petitioner Amit HK§E CORT OF CHHAETIGARH AT BI WRH PETITION (S) N0. 546 012008 !’ETITIONER RES?0NDENTS 3 I: (E M C e i b K WRIT IETm0N UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE cONsxn SB: Honme Sim satish K. Agnmotm J. ui QRAL ORDFR 8m Jy