1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1473 OF 2008 Worli Koliwada Nakhwa Machha Vavsaua Sahakari Society Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Prakash Pandurang Koli .. Respondent Mr.S.A.Pawar for petitioner Mr.A.S.Desai for respondent No.1 Mr.Sameer Patil, A.G.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5th March 2008 P.C. . There was no necessity to file this petition because the petitioner society has 2 succeeded before Revisional Authority but erroneously the Revisional Authority while passing operative order has mentioned that the order of the Dy.Registrar is maintained. The order must be read as a whole. The order directs remand of the main matter/proceedings to the Assistant Registrar and he is obliged to render a fresh decision. This clearly means that his earlier order is quashed and set aside or else, there could not have been any remand. Hence, the matter would now go before the Dy.Registrar, Coop.Societies for a decision afresh on the issue of membership of contesting respondents. All contentions of petitioner society as also those of the applicants are kept open and they shall be decided on their own merits, without being influenced by any observations in the impugned order. Petition disposed of. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)