IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8347 of 2006 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus SATYA PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR ----------- For the petitioners: Mr.Sudhir Singh, Asst.SG. For the respondents : None --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 15th October, 2008 We heard the counsel for the petitioners. 2. The counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the impugned order dated 9th December, 2005, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal is pursuant to the order of this court whereby this court directed the Tribunal to consider the matter afresh in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Ram Lubhaya Bagga & Ors.;(1998) 4 SCC 117. 3. If that be so, we find that the consideration of the matter by the Tribunal does not suffer from any legal flaw justifying interference by us. 4. Writ petition does not deserve to be admitted and it is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/- 2