HIGH, COURT OF CHHATTI$6AEEH AT 31LA5PU£§ Sihgle 3gmh 1 Hw’bae Mr. Jus?icz F?i1‘ir§§(er mwakar 1 Crirhinai Aggeal Ng. 5Q§ af ”19%; APPELLANT I Sgrenrjm Kuma’r 5m 0f Mcmgiufam Versus RiisPbNDEET ‘ Tha Smwkaf Mad§zya Pmdzsh 5hr: Awadh Tripwhi é; $mT. Ené‘sm T?§pa’rhi, caunsei for The appel an? ‘ Snm Pavmdm Agmwtzi Pane? Lawyzr‘ Tm" Me Swing QRSMINAL APFEM, UNDEE! SEéITIGN 3% (2 (3?- ?h’” COBE JUDéMAENT ‘ . {14G6t0i03 Presenf appea; cm§es em m‘ fha amgugner; Jzzdgmar‘? am order dated 154.19%: pcssed w :Aridl’nam Sessmns Ju$ga, .ahasgmund 'm sess'mns Triaé Ne. 301/1991 canxii¢?ing fha ccused/appelmm‘ far the offencgs punishabie under Sedimg 4985A, 323 and 30x3 cf The 1ad§an Pam§ Cada and semencing him’fo underga riggmus imp‘riswmzm‘ far one yaw, six manThs and seven years, respeci‘iveiy, AEI mg sememes were crdared . o run concufrem‘ly. (Sase cf “ma pm$ac$fian in brief is mm, an GZ.04.1§91 eha’ri Naiish' wws'r'egisw‘er‘ed by C‘natmhar Khén {PW-17) Sub nspecfor‘ ’m ‘Me affam‘ fhm’ :ieracsgd ¥anm Ba; was hcsprmhzed 4n 29 § $991 affer‘susmmmg bum mumes. On 341991 FER (Ex P43) was regisfemd‘ mains? f§16 uccu<ed/appei¥an% far afhe affenrg pumshcbi? undzr‘ Seaman 498 A 0f 1h? Indaan Pam! Cmie A¢ deceasad Kama Ba: daw on441991 a‘fw mvawmfien chgwn we: fxleé gagms The acrusedlappz‘ aw? far “rm QfTPrres under Sac'rmrs 498 ‘aryd 306 of mg Aadaqn Pancxi Cadg. Hawawn wh: e framina C§iiani§mm PRGQEDWE: A3: wU‘ H__~ __~ OF § i. r - +5 ' charges, ieamed caur-i' beéow has framed The chm‘ges agains‘f T$e accused/appelmn? far we affences pLmi3hQb‘22 undgr Secfions 498—A, 323 and 3Gé of Tm: Indian ?e;nai Cada. ‘ So as 1"; bc§d the accuseai/appeimm gu§§Ty, prasacufien 3 hts exammed a many as 18 wifnesses in sunper‘r nf ia‘s case, gtafement of fhe acau<edlqppeaimf was nba rammieg Lm ge 1cm 313 af The Code QT w!m n01 Pnacedur? m whaci’i Jlaawd the charges Higllaa gmmsf hm aw gylmaad ms Tnacenca end fca ie mpiim’ncm m #he ”aSP Apar" frrm‘a This imasses namew Hammr' Smgh (DW~1) mad EE’xaawar’ Smgn ' (EDW-Z) have’afso been examines: by ‘rheiaefenee in sappcr’r 0‘? xw. [s . case After héaring the aparfiesihe ‘Iriai‘ Caur'f has camisferj a-a—~.nd sentencad The accused/appelignt for the offences as enfiongd above. Hence This upped. Heard cohnsei fcr' “the parties and perused fhe maferia$ vaiiabk on recsrd including fhe judgmem’ impugnezi 6. Counsei far- ?he appencmt submh‘ ’r‘am‘ ”they are no’r 1pr'essmg This appeal as far as If r‘e'm‘es m renvm‘mn par“? of H'he impuoned Judgmera‘r and wouid confine fhem argumem f0 ithe sem‘ence part fher‘ecf aniy; Amardmg m fhem ”the gappeiiant is 0k! aged person 0f abgu? '51 year's, The: ‘me r incident is said To have Taken piece in 'ihe year 1991, that The apneHanT has aiready guffered a !m‘ by presecuf n9 his case Thaf The appeHant has aEready remained in Ian far abam‘ 7 imon'rhs, no as fu! purpase would be served m sendmg him ’ro jaii and if wauki be in fhe inferes‘r 0f Jusnce If The. senfence 34““‘ '. 1 ’ } imposed on him is reduced to the periad already undergcng by him. TO This, ccunsel for The 5mm has sericus abjaaficna . In View af abave, the appecd is par?iy cxHQwad. Canvic‘tian par'if of The impugned‘judgmzn? is maintained. Sentence par? 0f th appellanf in remien m Thg cffences under Seciians 498455 an 323 §s aise main’mined, Howevar', m respza‘r cf affgncg un er Sectiw 3Qé cf me IP€, his same-nee is reduced “m 3 year's m Tha‘r cf 7 year's, Hawgver‘, The appe‘i‘ian’r é$ dwec’rarj TO pcsh‘ an amaun? 0f §s. LGOO §n ‘the Cour-3‘ bemw wifhin a pemod 0f feur- manths from ”me data cf recap? m‘ copy af fms or ér,£Faiiure‘. if any, in depasiting fhe {mount wémin Tha pg iod gipuia‘ted: wauid make the appeQEmT iiabie m be ins§de Th jail far- a further per-3cm xuf three mam’hs rigamus im r§sonment Q Sd/- 8. Appeal Thus parfiy smceeés‘ ‘ ' ii Pritinker Diwaker 7