IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 744 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 744 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 744 OF 2006 Krishnan Kannan Mundakkai ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Ditendra Mishra for Petitioner. Mr. G. D. Utangale i/b. M/s. Utangale & Co. for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2009 DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2009 DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority states that unless the appeal that has been filed by the petitioner against the Order passed by the Municipal Corporation has already been disposed of, the Appeal shall be disposed of in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The learned counsel further states that in the event the Appeal has been disposed of, a copy of the Order shall be forwarded to the petitioner forthwith. In view of the above statement, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly states that the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)