-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1115 OF 2000 Electronics Enterprises : Appellant v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Special Rg. 42, Mumbai : Respondent Mr. A.P. Sathe, Sr. Counsel a/w. Mr. Mandar Vaidya with Mr. Suvarna Shendkar for Appellant Mr. J.S. Saluja for respondent Mr. A.R. Kumbhare 6(2)(3) present in court Coram : Dr. S. Radhakrishnan S.J. Kathawalla, JJ. Date : 18.9.2008 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel Mr. Sathe for the appellant and the learned counsel Mr. Saluja for the respondent. 1. We have also perused the order of the Tribunal dt. 9.6.2000. Mr. Saluja upon instructions of the Assessing Officer Mr. A.R. Kumbhare who is personally present in the court states that in the case of the assessee pertaining to the assessment year 1990-1991 the Respondent accepts the hybrid method of the accounting adopted by the assessee. 2. In view of the same no disallowance is called -2- for. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement the order of the Tribunal impugned in the above Appeal is set aside. 4. We are therefore not answering the questions raised in the above appeal. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. 5. There would be no order as to costs. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)