BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.11615 of 2011 1 MANI 2 PERIYASAMY ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 7 and 8 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.32 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.RAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR. R. RAMACHANDRAN, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 406, 420, 468, 471, 120(b), 294(b), 506(i) of IPC in Crime No. 32 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been arrayed as A7 and A8 in the said case. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case on the allegation that the petitioners sold the property by fabricating the documents. It is also submitted that A1 to A3 have been granted Anticipatory Bail by this Court. 3. The Learned Additional public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation of having sold the property by fabricating false document and the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Dindigul, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police for a period of three weeks daily at 05.30 p.m., and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICILA MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH P.S., DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 1. CC to M/S. A.RAJA Advocate SR.No.44751: DM::2011:DECEMBER:21:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11615 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 2P;6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/