^^ Vinay Prakash Toppo, aged about 32 years, Son ol Shri Prabhas Toppo, Occupatioa Police Constable, Goverruiient Railway Police, Pennaiient resideat of Village Bhimdongri, PoHce Station Motinala, District Mandla (C.O.) Present Address ; House No.D/2, Second Battalion Sakri, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Houie Affairs (PoUce) Department, Mautralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Geaeral of Police, State of Chhattisgarb, Police Headquarters, Raipur (C.G.j The Depuly Inspector General of Police, Rail, Raipur(C.G.) Shri P.K.C. Tiwari, Sr. Advocate wifh SIiri Rs-kesh Thakur Counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. State/respondents No. 1, 2 & 3 Advocate for fhe advaace copy. Heard. Leained senior coiuisel for fhe petitioner subiaits that fiie petitioner was appointed ia G.R.P. by Superintendent of Poltce (Rail), Indore, vide order dated 16.8.2000 (Annexure P/2) aiid after reorgaiiization of fhe State of M.P., he was aUocated to fhe State ofC.G. by order dated 09.11.2006. After aUocation, he has toeen traasfeiTed and posted at PoUce Station, Bijapur, wliicli is not a Railway Police Establishm.ent. His subinission is that Railway Police Establishiuent aad District Police Establishruent are two different establishiuents aad a person caanot be posted %T(S) No.6362/2007 ^^ siniply froia one establishinent to another establishiuent and if he is to be posted to anotiier establishnient, recourse ofiuefliod of deputation lias to be adopted. He subinits that a representation has already been filed by tlie petitioner vide Aanexure P/9 on 10/09/2007, but fhe saine has not been decided so fai, I have heard learued coiuisel for tiie parties aild have also pein.sed fhe appointment order as well as allocation order of the peUtioner. After goiag flirough fhe contents of fhe writ petitiou as also fhe docuuients refeired to above, ia fhe opiaion of this Court, fhe ends of justice would be served, if flie petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before tlie Director General of Police, State of Chliattisgarh, Police Headquarters, Raipur (C.G.) - respondent No.2 aiid respondent No.2 is directed to dispose ofthe said representation. Accorditigly, it is directed tliat if so advised, the petitioiier raay file a fresh copy of fhe representation along with a copy of tlie writ petition aad a copy of fhis order before the concemed authority-respoiident No.2 withia a period of 15 days frora. today and if such a representation is filed, fhe concemed autliority shaU dispose of tlie same as early as possible preferably w-ifhiu a period of oiie inonth. froin the date of filing of the said representation ia accordance with the rules. With the a&resaid observation/direction, fhis petition staiids disposed of. Shyna Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge