IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2735 of 2011 1. Ram Sevak Singh, son of Late Sukuldeo Singh 2. Rajo Singh, son of Late Sukuldeo Singh (Both residents of village- Khamhar, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai ….. Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 20.7.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 23.8.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.28092 of 2010. The petitioners have renewed their prayer for bail on the ground that they are in custody since June, 2010 and there is no progress in trial. A report was called for from the Trial Court in this regard and it is explained the reasons as to why the case could not be committed to the Court of Sessions earlier. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since June, 2010 and they have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. case No.351 of 2009 on conditions (i) That one of the bailor 2 shall be the brother/mother/wife of the petitioners and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J.)