IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15054 of 2010 DASU YADAV, SON OF LATE TUKLAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that for misuse of privilege of bail for only one day, the petitioner is in custody since 16.3.2010. A report was called for from the trial court about the stage of the trial and it appears that even though the charge was framed on 31.8.94 but not a single witness has been turned up as yet even though six witnesses have been named in the charge sheet. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C. No. I, Patna, in Sessions Trial No. 353 of 1994 arising out of Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 508 of 1993 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the sister of the petitioner. The bailor will 2 undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to positively conclude the trial within a period of nine months in view of the fact that the occurrence is of the year 1993. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)