HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5014 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner claims that she succeeded to premises bearing No.12-2-805 of Johndarnagar, Rethibowli, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad and that she is paying taxes and bills in respect of the said premises. O.S. No.4547 of 2007 is said to have been filed by her in the Court of the IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hydeabad, when the 4th respondent try to interfere with her possession and enjoyment over the premises. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation has assigned a different number in favour of the 4th respondent in respect of the same premises and that taking advantage of the same, the 4th respondent is trying to interfere with her possession. She made a representation, dated 16-11-2009, in this regard. The petitioner complaints that no action has been taken by the respondents 2 and 3 on her representation. 2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. 3. The assessment of a house number to a premises is only for the purpose of identification and to enable the Corporation to collect taxes. By itself, the assessment of a number does not confer any title upon an individual. The petitioner as already filed a suit before the Civil Court against the 4th respondent when she felt interference by her. In case, any declaratory relief is pleaded, it can be claimed in that suit itself. The correctness or otherwise of the entries made in favour of the 4th respondent can be challenged or rectified depending upon the outcome of the suit. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to establish her rights in the pending suit being O.S. No.4547 of 2007 on the file of the IX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hydeabad. It shall be open to the petitioner to claim further reliefs as regards to the entries made in the Property Register of the Corporation depending upon the out come of the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 01, 2011. KTL