WP(C) 5778/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. MU Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioners. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direct ion to the respondents to reengage them as Muster Roll worker under the responde nts. The prayer so made is on account of their temporary engagement way back in 1994. In this connection, the petitioners have referred to Annexures- 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 orders all dated 23.02.94 by which they had been engaged as Muster Roll l abour. As per instruction of the Executive Engineer, PWD (Roads), Barpeta Divisi on, engagements were purely temporary and as submitted by the learned counsel fo r the petitioners their such engagements came to an end immediately after their appointments. Now by filing the instant writ petition after 17 years of such engagemen ts, the aforesaid prayer has been made. Merely because the petitioners had been engaged for a few months in the year 1994, there cannot be any direction to the respondents to reengage the petitioners as Muster Roll workers after long 17 yea rs of their such engagements. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed.