IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34663 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.TIMY, D/O.C.J.THOMAS, AGED 30 YEARS, LOWER GRADE HINDI TEACHER, HIGH SCHOOL, THIRUVALAYANNUR, KALLUR-VADAKKEKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMAD SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, HIGH SCHOOL, THIRUVALAYANNUR, KALLUR-VADAKKEKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. SHRI.A.J.VARGHESE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C) No.34663 OF 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner was appointed as a Lower Grade Hindi Teacher by Ext.P1 order. Approval was rejected by Ext.P2, and by Ext.P4, appeal filed before the Deputy Director also was rejected. This led the petitioner to file Ext.P5 revision before the 1st respondent, and in this writ petition what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction for an expeditious disposal of Ext.P5 revision. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner also makes reference to Ext.P7 judgment rendered by this Court, and also Ext.P8, an order of the 1st respondent dated 16/02/2002. Since the claim is pending consideration of the statutory authorities, at this stage, it is not necessary to deal with these contentions. 3. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P5 is a statutory W.P.(C) No.34663/2008 -2- revision filed by the petitioner under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV-A, K.E.R, I am inclined to dispose the writ petition directing an expeditious disposal of Ext.P5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 revision with notice to the petitioner and 5th respondent as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three months of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg