IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 30332 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: December 22, 2010. Goldy and another. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Vikas, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No. 65 dated 22.07.2010, under Sections 307/324/452/323/34 IPC, registered at Police Station ‘E’ Division, District Amritsar. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. Brief allegations against the petitioners-accused are that they alongwith co-accused, Vasu entered the house of complainant –Abhishek. CRM No.M-30332 of 2010 Co-accused Vasu gave Datar blow on the left arm of the complainant. Petitioner-accused, Goldy gave Datar blow on the left shoulder of the complainant. Hue and cry was raised by the complainant, which attracted uncle of the complainant Davinder Kumar. Petitioner-accused, Sonu gave Datar blow on the left side of the head of Davinder Kumar. There are serious allegations against the petitioners-accused. No accused has been arrested in this case. Hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extra- ordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners- accused. Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant application for anticipatory bail filed by Goldy and Sonu is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of merit. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) December 22, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2