1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.203 OF 2009 Rasiklal Ratilal Soni @ Salla Petitioner versus Daulatbhai Chhaganbhai Hirani & another Respondents G.H.Keluskar for petitioner. Rajiv M. Desai for respondent no.1. Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17th July 2009 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the first respondent. Both the parties are personally present in the Court. The applicant in the open Court tendered apology to the first respondent on account of the harassment caused to the first respondent during last ten years. The applicant states that the first respondent may be permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.4.00 lakhs deposited by him with the Sessions Court. The applicant further states that as and when he collects the balance amount of Rs.4.00 lakhs he will pay the same to the first respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the first respondent states that the parties are related and considering the statements made by the applicant in the 2 open Court, the first respondent has no objection for quashing the order of conviction and sentence and for compounding the offence. 3. Hence, I pass following order :- (a) Statements made by the applicant are accepted. In view of the consent of the first respondent, the impugned judgements and orders are quashed and set aside and the offence stands compounded; (b) The first respondent is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.4.00 lakhs (Rs.Four lakhs only) deposited by the applicant in the Sessions Court; (c) The Sessions Court will allow withdrawal of the amount on the basis of an authenticated copy of this order duly issued by registry of this Court. (A.S.OKA, J.)