AB 2950/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. R.P.Sharma, learned counsel for the accused petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.Munir, learned Addl.P.P,Assam who has produced the Case Diary in con nection with Helem P.S. Case No. 42/11 U/S 420/ 406 IPC. The learned Addl. P.P. submits that there is a Committee constituted reg arding the status and function of various private financial organizations on whi ch they are running business in a fictitious manner.The Accresent way Management working group is one of those alleged fictitious financial organizations. The a ccused/petitioner is an agent of the said private Company and he has been sellin g insurance policy to different customers as per the scheme floated by the Compa ny. Interestingly, as submitted by Mr.Sarma, learned Sr. counsel,the informant a lso joined as agent of the said Company and in that view of the matter the allegations brought against the present accused p etitioner is not sustainable In view of the said circumstances and the submissions made by the learne d counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that the petitioner has b een able to make out a prima facie case for granting pre-arrest bail to him. Acc ordingly, the interim bail granted on 16.9.11 is hereby made absolute subject to condition that the accused/ petitioner shall make himself available before the I.O. concerned at least once in a for fortnight till the investigation is compl ete or a period of 6 (six) months whichever is earlier. This bail petition stands disposed of.