IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONjs )No. {0%) Of2011 BETWEEN Eulsi Ram Dehari S/o Shri Somnath Dehari, aged about 55 years, occupation— service, Upper Division Teacher, Government Poorva Madhyamik Shala, Risora, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG). PETITIONER: A N D / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). .The District Education Officer, Raigarh , District Raigarh (CG). / 3. The Block Education Officer, Baramkela, District Raigarh (CG). RESPONDENTS: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (Q HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1089 of 2011 PETITIONER : Tulsi Ram Dehari. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Kamal Kishore Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ Respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 25“ day of February, ‘201 1) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to grant regular pay scale as well as other benefits with effect from the initial date of appointment on the basis of circular (Annexure P/4). On perusal of the circular (Annexure P/4), it is found that the same provides for grant of regular pay scale to the teachers who were appointed aRer the year 1982 and before 1995. In the case on hand, admittedly, the petitioner was appointed on 22.10.1974. Thus, the petitioner may not be entitled to any benefit under the above-stated circular. The petition, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit kw i ,“t‘ W x x e‘mw» m \H H xvi ac Ntt xii Awmwwnxwa” l w