<^2-2^-07 IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCSSARH AT BILASPUR w.:P. (Si^ :i^9&i .&6S- • ' / 2011 Petitioners ^ .^^/ ^wy^ ^y ** ^Y*>' ** ^/y^< ^^^' ^7 <y ShardaPrasad Jaiswal, S/o Shri Brij Lal Jaiswal, Aged about 50 years, U.D.T. 6ovt. WMrfte Schbol, Pondi, Block - Ramanujnagar, Education Oistrict Surajpur, Distt. Surguja-(C.G.) Punita Prasad bwedi S/Q Late Shri Vishwanath Prasad Dwedi, Aged about 48 years, U.D.T. 6ovt. Middle School, Prem Nagar, Block - Prem Nagar, Education Versus Respondents (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Raipur, Distt. Raipur-(C.6.) /-" .3. The District Education Officer, Distt. Surguja-(C.G.) WRIT2ETETCOJ^_UNDER_ARnCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON The petitioners most humbly and respectfully begs to submit QS under:- 0> r!fBil-m-^Bt(:f1fT?f3so?(rr-i^ii^5; sn^r W R;-)!'* ^SIT 3fl^T a**flit> Deepti W*1?IT iB*l(^ T5^ •^I-MK'1'4, yTll'M'IS, fsli'll'H^i .U3..:.?..:&.)...'^:...^'..^^. S^V 'q^W ('j.ltsi't'T) TOfiw ^ifcr sn^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MoMan Shrivastava^.j. 17-06^011 ; Shri Anil Singh Rajput, coui] Ms. Sunita Jain.Panel Learned counsel for the 22/1/08 (Annexure P/4), the writ p| to verification ofthe facts of the of Paras Nath Gupta v. State ofl decided on 15/1/07. However, e] benefits have not been extended passed in the matter. He furth Government itself has issued a c regutar pay scaleto the Teach^ followed byanother circular State Govemment has taken a scale and increments. This Court has already de^ dated 22/1/08 (Annexure P/4). with two eircuiars dated 27/7/09 tt is for the concerned authoritie^ accordance with the order passed | With the aforesaid observat case, dartd cf)(«iI<']^lTT^f^K'lf "^f (s*«^ <F>it$l'(, ^siRm aii^i liset for the petitioners. Law^er for the State on advance copy. Ipetitioner. submits that vkle order dated ^tition of the petitioner was aliowred, subject i, in the light of order passed in the case IChhattisgarh & others p/V.P.(S) No.58/07] ^en though the petition was aiiowed, the |o the petitioner nor any orders have been ^r submits that subsequently, the State Ireular on 27/7/09 in the matter of grantof •1-s appointed before 1992 and after 1995 5/1/2011 (Annexure P/7), wherein the d^cision in the matter of grant of regular pay Tlhe tided the claim of the petMoner vide order State has also subsequently come out (A|inexure P/6) and 5/1/2011 (Annexure P/7). to deal with the case of the petitioner, in ^ythis Cpurt eariier and its own circular. :|ons, the petition is flnally disposed off. Sd-/ Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava •:^^ ^Judge WwE\ll Kl^ll ^TCRT, <l"l-li';'li<t—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. !ft11