IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURT DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.26264 OF 2001 Between: T.Veeraiah. … Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh, reptd., by its Mandal Revenue Officer, Sangareddy, Medak District and two others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: None Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue for R.1. None for R.2 and R.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd Respondents without any process of law directly auctioned the 3rd Respondent ﬁrm is violative and is not maintainable and only after due process of law the same may conduct and the 1st Respondent all further actions in this regard including Memo No.C2/9177/2000, Dt.19/10/2001 will suspend as are not follow due process of law and both respondents directed only after ﬁling Civil Court and obtain decree follow the further actions”. The learned counsel for the petitioner has been absent both in the forenoon and again in the afternoon. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Even otherwise, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration because in paragraph 4 of the counter-aﬃdavit ﬁled on behalf of respondent No.2-Corporation, it is stated that neither the petitioner nor the Directors of respondent No.3 responded to the notices issued under the Revenue Recovery Act, 1864, that the Corporation has abandoned the proceedings under the said Act and initiated fresh proceedings under Section 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 by ﬁling O.P.No.1836 of 2000 in the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad; and that the said O.P., was allowed. It is also stated that Execution petition, seeking enforcement of the order passed in O.P.No.1836 of 2000, was ﬁled and the same is pending. In view of the said facts pleaded in the counter-aﬃdavit, this Writ Petition ﬁled questioning the notices issued under the Revenue Recovery Act has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ------------------------- ----------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date: 24-9-2008 MNR