ssp 1 WP 6820 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6820 of 2010 Manish Radhakrishna Valanju .....Petitioner versus The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6821 OF 2010 Shrikrishna Abasaheb Lokhande .....Petitioner versus The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6829 OF 2010 Sujeet Aashokrao Bastapure .....Petitioner versus The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Kishor R. Jagdale and Ms.Vaishali K. Jagdale, for the petitioners. Mr.M.M.Malvankar, for the respondent-Corporation. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR& A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 11th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. The petitioners in each of the petitions have already made common representation as well as individual representation to the respondents in connection with their grievance. The common representation dated 22-02-2010 made by the petitioners finds place at ssp 2 WP 6820 of 2010 page 26 (Exh.D) in the compilation of Writ Petition No.6820 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the representation has not been decided by the authorities. Learned counsel for the Corporation states that representation given by the petitioners shall be decided by respondent No.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Mumbai, by 30-04-2011 and whatever may the decision shall be communicated to the petitioner. 2. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation, it is directed that representation of the petitioners shall be decided by respondent No.2 and the same may be disposed of latest by 30-04-2011 and the decision may be communicated to the petitioners forthwith. Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation may communicate this order to respondent No.2 forthwith. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the issue and it is for the respondent No.2 to take appropriate decision as deemed fit and in accordance with law. The only direction given is to decide the representation of the petitioners within the stipulated time. 3. In view of what has been stated above, the writ petitions are disposed of. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )