IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.95 of 2011 MD. MAKSOOD ALAM SON OF MD. RAMJAN ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUNDRA, P.S. ROH, DISTRICT- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE I.G. POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE D.I.G. POLICE, MAGADH RANGE, GAYA 4. THE S.P. NAWADA, DISTRICT- NAWADA 5. THE COLLECTOR, NAWADA, DISTRICT- NAWADA 6. THE DY. S.P. NAWADA, DISTRICT- NAWADA 7. THE SRI RAMAKANT SINGH OFFICER IN CHARGE, NARDIGANJ, P.S. NARDIGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADA 8. MADINA KHATOON WIFE OF USMAN MIAN 9. USMAN MIAN SON OF NAME NOT KNOWN 10. PARVEJ ALAM SON OF USMAN MAIN, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MESAURDHA, P.S. NARDIGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADA ----------- 2 07.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that in Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 68 of 2009 for the alleged offence under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code is not being properly investigated with respect to the involvement of all the accused persons namely respondent nos. 8 to 10. It is submitted that the police till date has only been able to complete the investigation against the husband of the deceased and has submitted the charge- sheet who is facing the trial. However, as regards the rest of the accused persons namely the respondent nos. 8 to 10, the investigation is still pending. It is further submitted that the respondent no.7 is not properly investigation with respect to the role of respondent nos. 8 to 10 inasmuch as the relevant instructions even the confidential information given to the Investigating Officer is leaked out to the accused persons. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submissions. Considering the submissions, let the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of investigation police report be submitted forthwith. As regards the grievance of the petitioner against the Investigating Officer that he is not properly investigating the case, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the respondent no.4 with specific details so that the matter could be considered by the respondent no.4 for taking the necessary action as per law. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)