THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 296 of 2002 DT.8.8.2011 Between: G Subash Nandaraj Goud and ors … Petitioners And Smt K Prameela and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri T Bheemsen Counsel for respondents: The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 296 of 2002 JUDGMENT : (Per Sri Justice V Eswaraiah) This writ petition is filed questioning order dated 2.5.2001 in L.G.C.No.44 of 1997 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbers (Prohibition) Act, at Hyderabad (in short referred to as Special Court) in partly allowing the L.G.C. The writ petitioners herein are the respondents before the Special Court. The respondents herein filed the above noted L.G.C., under Section 8 (1) of the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act to declare the petitioners herein/the respondents therein as land grabbers and direct them to deliver vacant possession of the application schedule property together awarding a compensation of rupees one lakh. The Special Court on the consideration of the matter, while partly allowing the L.G.C directed the respondents therein-the petitioners herein to deliver the vacant possession of an extent of 171 sq mtrs forming part of Bit “B” and Bit “C” in T.S. No. 35 as shown in Ex.C-2 Commissioner sketch to the applicants therein-the respondents herein within two months from the date of the order and in default thereof, directed the Revenue Divisional Officer, concerned to evict the respondents therein/the petitioners herein and their men from the property and deliver the vacant possession of the property to the respondents herein/the petitioner therein within two months thereafter. Hence, the present writ petition is filed. This Court by order dated 27.4.2009 granted three weeks time to comply with office objections, observing that otherwise, the writ petition would stand dismissed as against the respondents 1, 3 and 4. Thereafter, by order dated 18.4.2011 granted four weeks time to comply with the office objections directing to pay necessary batta due and furnishing correct address of the respondents 1,3 and 4, observed that in default of it, the writ petition would stand dismissed against the respondents 1,3 and 4 without further reference to the Court. The said order was not complied with and the same was given effect to and the writ petition was dismissed as against the respondents 1,3 and 4 and it became final. It is to be noted that the Special Court in L.G.C No. 44 of 1997 by order dated 2.5.2001 while answering issue no.3 declared the writ petitioners as land grabbers within the meaning of section 2 (d) and (e) of the Act in respect of the schedule land. Hence, we are of the opinion that the order passed by the Special Court is an inseparable one and as such the dismissal of the writ petition as against respondents 1, 3 and 4 binds the petitioners. Thus, the order of the Special Court is binding on all the petitioners. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ V ESWARAIAH,J ________________________ G KRISHNA MONAH REDDY,J DATE: 8.8.2011 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 296 of 2002 DT.8.8.2011