1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4236/2009 (Vishwabharti Samajik & Sanskrutik Mandal ..vs. Edu. Officer, Z.P. Chandrapur) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- NOVEMBER 12, 2009 Heard learned Advocate Shri S. Saoji for petitioner, Advocate Shri P.N.Shende for respondent No.2 and learned AGP for respondent No.1. The petitioner management contends that service of respondent No.2 were terminated on 11/5/1991. The School Tribunal has found that his name was included in the Time Table for academic year 1991-92 and he was teaching English subject to Standard 8th and 9th and Economic subject to Standard 9th and 10th. In view of this material, School Tribunal has found stand of management incorrect. Advocate Shri Thakre argues that before School Tribunal, it was pointed out that petitioner had tampered with some documents and was using manipulated documents to 2 show his service. It is further stated that one Shri B.P.Borkar was appointed from 01/7/1991 after removal of respondent No.2. No documents are produced by the management to show that from 01/7/1991 Shri Borkar or some other teacher was teaching English subject or Economic subject to the classes, disclosed in time table by respondent No.1. If respondent No.1 was discontinued on 11/5/1991, it would have been difficult for him to get access to the school record and to manipulate these things. The allegation in reply are too vague to deserve any credence. Thus, termination as alleged by management has not been proved. In the result, no case is made out warranting interference in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale.