1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 1995 Bhaskar Narayan Sathe ....Petitioner. V/s 1. Shri Kirtikumar Bhagwandas Shah and Ors. .....Respondents. ---- None for the petitioner. Mr. Ranjit Bhonsale for respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 7 to 9, 11, 12 and 14 to 18. ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 1st September, 2006. P.C.: 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that he has learnt that the petitioner has expired. However, he has not received any confirmation from his clients to that effect. 3. In any case, this matter has been adjourned from time to time. 2 The petitioner is appearing in person. On the last date i.e. on 18/8/2006, Office was directed to send a telegram to the Petitioner. Office note shows that the telegram was, in fact, sent to the Petitioner on 23/08/2006. In spite of service of telegram, none appears on behalf of the Petitioner. 4. Hence, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (V.M. KANADE, J.)