IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 21063 of 2002 Between: M/s. Vantech Chemicals Limited, 103,Vijaya Enclave,Plot No.32, Srinivasanagar Colony,Hyderabad-3. rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.J.A. Rama Rao,S/o Sri Venkateshwar Rao, R/o Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner & Direcctor of Agriculture, Andhra Pradesh, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction one more particularly in the nature of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Orders passed by the respondent in proceedings No.PP.II(2)1714/2002 dated 3-10-2002 and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional being violative of Art 14 and 19(1) (g) of the constitution of India and further declare the same as being contrary to the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Insecticides Rules, 1971 or in the alternative this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct that the Orders of the respondent in Proceedings No.PP.II(2) 1714/2002dated 3-10-2002 shall be confined only to the "Carbofuram 3% G" of Batch No.068, of manufacturing date of 7/2002 and pass such further or other order or orders as thisHon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the Circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.P.SUDHEER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21063 of 2002 ORAL ORDER : This writ petition was listed for hearing on 05.06.2009. As there was no representation for the petitioner, it is posted under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL” today. Though the matter is listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 08-06-2009 Msr HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21063 of 2002 08-06-2009 Msr