Criminal Misc. No. M-176 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-176 of 2011 Date of decision : 30.03.2011 Deepak ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner vide FIR No. 303 dated 12.07.2010 under Sections 395 & 397 IPC at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner was not involved in the occurrence. He has referred to affidavit, Annexure P-2 sworn by the complainant. According to the said affidavit, petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. Learned State counsel has, however, opposed the prayer. He, on instructions from ASI Ramesh Kumar, who is present in court, submits that five prosecution witnesses have already been examined and rest are likely to be examined on the next date of hearing. He further submits that Criminal Misc. No. M-176 of 2011 2 vehicle which was used in the crime was in fact registered in the name of the father of the petitioner and has been taken on superdari by him. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. The allegation in the FIR is of highway robbery at about 1.00 a.m. at night. The allegation is that a TATA Siera vehicle was parked in front of the truck being driven by the complainant which contained carpets. The destination of the said truck was Bombay. However, it was stopped on the way and robbed. In view of nature of allegations contained in the FIR, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to concession of bail. The petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. March 30, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE