IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 15 OF 2011 (S/S) Brijpal Singh ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Present: Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging an advertisement dated 31.12.2010 issued by respondent no. 3, by which the recruitment has to be made in Cane Cooperative Society. The petitioner has not been able to show as to what is his locus standi in filing the writ petition. No reasons have been assigned and no cause of action has been displayed in the writ petition. The only contention of the petitioner made in the writ petition is that the financial condition of the Cane Cooperative Societies is very poor and are not in a position to bear the burden of new appointments. This should not be the concern of the petitioner. This petition being wholly frivolous, is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 6.1.2011 Rathour