amm f Singie Banch 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 4&3 0f 201 1 PETITIONER: §mt Teja Kurre W/o Shri Artidas Kurre, aged about 42 years, EX Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Paraswani(k) R/ o Village Paraswani, P.S. Bhatapara (Rural), Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). iv Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Sub Divisional Officer (R)& Prescribed Authority (Panchayat) , Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). RESPONDENTS: 1'. ‘ «x/ fNFTr WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ‘ ' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' Ashok QC) HECBH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILA$PUR WRIT PETWION (C) NO. 4293 OF 20H {Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Arvind $inha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State, QEDER ORAL {Passed on this 04‘ day of August, 201 1) Ptesent :- The petitfoner impugns the order dated 21.06.2011, whereby, on account of non-oresertce of the. petitioner in the proceedings, which was initiated against the petitioner for an alteged embezztement of the Panchayat funds. Learned couneei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to fiie response to the _show-cause notice, which was issued vide order dated 24.02.2011. HOWever, the warrant of arrest should be quashed. as the petitioner has faited to appear on certain dates. _Be that as it may. in a case where presence of petitioner is required, the petitioner must make herseif avaiiabie on the date of hearing, as there are eerious charges against the petitioner. if for want of presence, a warrant has been issued, the petitioner has tiberty to approach the authority concerned and make an application for canceltation of'warrant on the grounds may be avaitable to the petitioner for non-presence on the severat dates. ln View of the above! the wrtt petition is dismissed with the above~ Sd/- * § , satish K. Agnihotri f 7‘ Judge stated liberty. _\ PETiTiONER Smt. Teja Kurre Versus I RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others