IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 212 of 2008 Dharampal and others ....... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....... Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Mamta Bist, A.G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Mamta Bist, A.G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No.3. 2. Ms. Mamta Bist, the learned A.G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned on 24/06/2008. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 18.03.2008 shall stand vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 04.03.2009 Shiv