1 conp22-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Contempt Petition No. 22 of 2010. in Writ Petition No. 137 of 2008 Mr.S.R.Pathare & Ors. .. Petitioners v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Others ..Respondents Mr.G.N.Salunke for the Petitioner Mr.Bharat Mehta AGP for the Respondent No.2 Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 1st October , 2010 P.C. : 1. Respondent nos.2, 3 and 4 have appeared before the Court on account of notice issued by this Court. Heard learned Counsel on both sides. By order dated 9.6.2008 respondent no.2 was directed to take certain steps. The petitioner, before this Court makes a grievance that the respondent no.2 has not carried out those orders and that amounts to committing contempt. 2 conp22-10.sxw 2. After having perused the order dated 9.6.2008, I am inclined to observe that in the absence of specific time frame within which the respondent no.2 was obliged to take steps as per the said order, it is difficult to say that as of today the respondent no.2 has committed contempt. Hence this petition can’t be admitted. The petition is dismissed. 3. By way of token costs, petitioners are directed to pay cost of Rs. 1000/- to Respondent Nos.2, to respondent no.3 and 4 jointly. Cost to be paid on or before 30.11.2010. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]