IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11817/2008 Decided on:27.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Brij Lal. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he has put in ten years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year, however, his services have not been regularized. It has come in the reply filed by the respondents that the petitioner is working only from October, 1995. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in case he has worked continuously for ten 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 years with 240 days in each calendar year, within a period of two months, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 27.12.2010 *awasthi*