f-s.Sagt'ftfiNi ^ ^^ ^v TB THE HIS' CC.UIG' OF SSQtKh. PRTOESH AT JABAEFUR WRTT PETTriON BC'. OF PETITIONBRs Ram Peatap Sahu SOEO£ Hicchha Kara Sahu, aged about 40 yeare, resideni .**' o£ Gram Ter.dua, Dlstrict Raipuc.'^ RBSPOKDSNTi Ghanshyam Prasad Sharma, son of Madaa £al Sh^rma, aged 'about^45 years, resident of Grara Tendaa, BlocK Dharseeva, Tah.•& Distt. aaiour, H.P. -) 2. Efiryashan AdnikaFi (Election Offlcsr?, Development Block . Dharseeva,/Tah. and.District Raipur, M.p. 3.^Presiding Officer, Eooth No. 149, Block Dharseeva, Tah. &.Di3tt. RaiDQr, H.P, 4^ Presiaent Officer Booth No.150, Development Bloc'i< Dharseeva, Tah. •snd District Ral.pur. 5. Bhagwafc Sahu, son 6f D ayaram 'Sahy, resident of Gram Tendua, Block Bharsesva, Ta'n. & Distt» aai; 6. AshokDubey, son of Shri. Ram Prasad Dubey, resident of Tendya, Block Dharseeva. Tah. & Sist-fc.- XI-HC-22 3^ •^iwici^, tSTft+ns, Rjciwy Sfl^TERT feRi 3(1^1 g;i)iw^f5(T yv 3n^T?RITW:Hf?cT 14-7-2005 When the matter is called out, none presenton behaffofthe petitioner. No representation is made. Heard Mr. Devesh Verma, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.7. Perusal of the writ petition shows that it relates to the election of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat: Tendua, Block: Dharseeva, District Raipur, held in the year 1994. Thereafter, two elections have been held, as such, the matter has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. +i'ii^'41-i i4iti<-)T^'tecz)'<,Riuit ^iarfWTSn^T