1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2004 Balasaheb Sopan Pavle ... Petitioner Versus The Union of India and anr. Respondents None for Petitioner. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : MARCH 03, 2006 DATED : MARCH 03, 2006 DATED : MARCH 03, 2006 P.C. . When the matter is called out, none present for the Petitioner. The challenge in this petition was to the validity of Securitization Act. The validity of the Act is upheld by the Apex Court. In the light of that, this will not be a fit case for this court to exercise extra ordinary jurisdiction. It will be open to the Petitioner to avail of the remedy which in law he may be entitled to. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) 2 (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)