Crl.Misc.No.M-4767 of 2010 Present: Mr.J.S.Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Aman Dhir, Advocate for the complainant. * * * Vide order dated 18.2.2010, concession of interim bail was extended to the petitioner subject to joining the investigation and the matter was adjourned to 6.4.2010 to enable the petitioner to join investigation. On 6.4.2010, it was brought to the notice of the Court that the petitioner has still not joined the investigation. However, another opportunity was granted to join the investigation and the matter was adjourned for 29.4.2010. Today, the learned counsel for the State has brought to the notice that the petitioner has not joined the investigation. Petitioner is present in the Court and states that matter has been compromised. Learned counsel for the respondent/complainant however, stated that the same is incorrect and no compromise has been arrived at between the parties. Even otherwise, it is evident from the order of the trial Court that the petitioner did not join the investigation even on the directions of the trial Court. Thus, it is apparent that petitioner has no such intention to joint the investigation. In view of the above, concession of interim bail cannot be granted to the petitioner. Dismissed. [ Nirmaljit Kaur ] Judge 29.04.2010 sd