IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 897 of 2008 Abbal Singh Faraswan & Others. … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. … Respondents Mr. S.S. Chaudhan, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. S.S. Chaudhan, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no.3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 4 before the Circle Officer concerned on 29.11.2008 whereas chargesheet has also been filed against petitioner no.3 before Circle Officer concerned on 06.12.2008, and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in the counter affidavits filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 17.11.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 18.12.2008 V.K.