IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2849 of 2011 FAIYAZ ALAM @ MD. FAIYAZ ANSARI, SON OF ABDUL GHAFOOR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GAR, P.S. AMOUR DISTRICT PURNEA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR SARWAN THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA, DISTRICT PURNEA. 2. SHRI MOIZUDDIN, SUB DIVISONAL OFFICER, BAISI, P.S. BAISI, DISTRICT PURNEA. 3. SHRI S. HAMBHU PRASAD, CIRCLR OFFICER, AMOUR, P.S. AMOUR, DISTRICT PURNEA. 4. SRI SHAMIM ANSARI SON OF LATE YUNUS ANSARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARHIYA, P.S. AMOUR, DISTRICT PURNEA. -------------- 04. 22.11.2011 By filing show cause opposite party no.2 Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Baisi, Purnea has stated before this Court that he was never served with copy of the order dated 8.4.2010, as such, considering the exigency of the situation under order dated 14.03.2011 proceeded to appoint opposite party no.3 Circle Officer, Amour, Purnea as receiver of the lands in question. Under order dated 8.4.2010 this Court directed for maintenance of the status quo as existing on 8.4.2010 over the lands in question. Sub-Divisional Magistrate being not aware about the order dated 8.4.2010 passed order dated 14.3.2011 appointing receiver, as such, cannot be said to be in contempt. Opposite party no.2 has now learnt about interim order dated 8.4.2010, he is directed to act in accordance therewith. With the observation aforesaid, the contempt petition is disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)