IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7247 of 2010 Date of Decision: 12.5.2010 Malkit Kaur ....Petitioner. Versus Municipal Corporation and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. H.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. By way of instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release in her favour the retiral benefits including the gratuity which became due to her on account of the death of her son, Harbans Singh, who died on 1.10.2008, during the course of his employment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sent a legal notice dated 6.1.2010 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and she shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to them to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent to take a decision on the legal notice (Annexure P-3) sent by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order. May 12, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE