1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.(MD).No.854 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2011 M.Thangaraj : Appellant/Petitioner Vs. The Principal Secretary and Transport Commissioner, Chennai 600 005. : Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 22.11.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.4812 of 2010 on the file of this Court. W.P.(MD).No.4812 of 2010: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in impugned order of suspension in Proc.No.41845/VA2/2009 dated 12.08.2009 on the file of the respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondent herein to reinstate the petitioner in service with all service benefits. For Appellant : Mr.Veera.Kathiravan For Respondent : Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY P.JYOTHIMANI, J] This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 22.11.2010 made in W.P.(MD).No.4812 of 2010, in and by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the Writ Petition, which was filed by the appellant challenging the order of suspension. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. We see no reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. However, we find that the appellant has given a representation on 28.01.2010 to the respondent for the purpose of revocation of suspension. 3. Considering the above said facts and circumstances of the case, while confirming the order of the learned Single Judge, we direct the respondent to consider the representation of the appellant dated 28.01.2010 and in addition to the above, it is open to the appellant to make a fresh representation to the respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in which event, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law regarding revocation of suspension, taking note of the fact that the appellant has been kept under suspension from 01.08.2009. The Writ Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Principal Secretary and Transport Commissioner, Chennai 600 005. +1 CC to MR.Veera Kathiravan, Advocate (SR.No.31626) JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD).No.854 of 2011 15.09.2011 NB NSV/20.9.11/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/