In the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital Criminal Misc. Application No. 564 of 2006 Neeru Chawla W/o Himanshu Chawla R/o 131, Mohalla Bhatti, Kasba and P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur, U.P. ..........Applicant Vs 1- State of Uttaranchal. 2- Subhash Chand Chawla S/o Amarnath Chawla 3- Smt. Krishna Devi W/o Subhash Chawla, 4- Pawan Chawla S/o Subhash Chawla, 5- Himanshu @ Ranjit Chawla All R/o 131, Mohalla Bhatti, Kasba and P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur, U.P. ...........Respondents. Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate for the respondents 2 to 5. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This petition U/S 482 Cr. P.C., by Smt. Neeru who is the wife of Himanshu @ Ranjit Chawla, has been filed on the ground that both the parties have entered into compromise and the settlement between the parties has arrived that all the cases pending before the court of law shall be withdrawn by the respective parties. According to the compromise both the parties are ready to live together. The compromise has been verified, as all the parties are present in person before this Court. 2- Keeping in view the terms arrived at between the parties, the proceedings of criminal case No. 5666 of 2005, State Versus Himanshu and others U/S 498-A I.P.C. and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar are hereby quashed, in view of the pronouncement of the Apex Court reported in the case of B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another reported in 2003 S.C.C. (Cri.) Volume- I Page 848. 3- Accordingly the petition is disposed of in terms of compromise filed by parties. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) Dated: 26-07-2006 ISB