$§§§€§LE gE§§$§§ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writyemion (siNo. fip/Izow / G. P. Pahare, S/o Ramavtar Pahare, aged Petitioner: about 55 years, Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Surajpur, Saxguja Van Mandal, Sarguja (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgaxh, Through the Respondents: 1 . Secretary, Forest Department, Manualaya, 2. ’sm R. s. Thakur, attached orrrcer, North Sarguja Eorest Division, Sarguja (CG). D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ITUTION OF INDIA. CONST M M f g H16}? COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S3 No. 5712 of2009 PETITIONE'R : G.P.Pahare. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITU‘I‘ION OF INDIA SB: Hen’ble Sin-i Satish K. Agmhmri, J. ‘ Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate with Shri Pallav Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. l Shri AKPrasad, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 09m day of February, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. I submits that the petitioner has already continued at the original place ofposting for about five months on account of interim order dated 06. 10.2009 granted by this Court. Shn' Roy submits that the State/respondent No. 1 shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 22.09.2009 (Annexare P/l ). In View of the above submission, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this stage, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3. In view ofthe fact that when no eifect could be given to the impugned order dated 22.09.2009 (Annexure P/I) on account of the interim order dated 06.10.2009, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity of the impugied order dated 22.09.2009 (Annexure Pi’l). 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed ofwith liberty reserved to the State/respondent No. 1 to pass appropriate orders keeping in View the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance ofthe order dated 22.09.2009 (Annexure PI 1). Interim relief gamed on 06. 10.2009 is vacated.