IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3632 of 2011 SANJAY MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased, and allegedly, he along with his other family members demanded one cycle and some cash from deceased and when the aforesaid demand was not fulfilled, deceased was done to death. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was working in Punjab at the relevant time and he used to send money to his family members. It is further pointed out by him that the petitioner had sent Rs.10, 000/- to his mother, which was not liked by the deceased and she quarreled with the mother of the petitioner and subsequently, consumed poison. To fortify his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards para-9 of the application and submitted that in postmortem examination of dead body of the deceased, no external injury was found and the doctor could not ascertained the real cause of the death. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as submissions of the parties coupled with this aspect of the matter that, subsequently, informant filed a petition before the court below exonerating the petitioner and his family members from the present case, let the petitioner, namely, Sanjay Mandal be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Lalan Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.) P.S. Case No.19 of 2007. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)