HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO COMPANY APPLICATION No.1002 OF 2011 ORDER: This application has been taken out by the learned Advocates Commissioners appointed to discharge the functions of the Official Liquidator of the company under liquidation, seeking appropriate orders to be passed on the representation dated 15.06.2011 submitted by the respondents herein. 2. By an order passed on 07.06.2006 in C.P.No.144 of 2001, this Court passed an order appointing the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator of M/s. Southern Continental Contractors Limited. Thereafter, by another order passed on 04.08.2006 in C.P.No.140 of 2001 and 144 of 2001, the learned Advocate Commissioners have been appointed and they were directed to take appropriate steps to safeguard the assets of the company under liquidation and take such measures as are necessary and proper for liquidating the liabilities of the company to the extent it is feasible. By various orders passed by this Court, the learned Advocate Commissioners have realized and sold several assets of the company and from out of the sale proceeds thus realized, the liabilities of the company under liquidation have largely been liquidated. The learned Advocate Commissioners have also undertaken various developmental works, which are required to be put in place in the to lay-outs developed by the company under liquidation. In that process Sampathnagar lay out has been developed fully. However, Smt R. Chitra Srinivas, Smt. Battu Usha, S/Sri Thakur Ram Singh, Sattarapu Sridhar Babu, Battu Chandra Shekar have submitted a representation to the learned Advocate Commissioners suggesting some modification and alterations with regard to the alignment of the approach road adjoining plot Nos. 333 to 338 in the said lay out. Complete details as reflected in a sketch have been furnished with their representation dated 15.06.2011 as to the necessary extent, the modification is required. They have also got a plan drawn by an architectural engineering firm and enclosed the same to their representation, so that it becomes very clear as to how the suggested modifications will be mutually beneficial to all parties concerned. Sri Thakur Ram Singh and Sri B. Chandra Shekar are also present in the Court today to re-assure the Court that, as proposed by them, necessary steps would be undertaken by them at their own expense if their representation is favourable considered and disposed of in its terms. 3. Heard Sri M. Jagannath Sarma, learned Advocate Commissioner. 4. Learned Advocate Commissioners have clearly pointed out that the respondents are ready to develop the common approach road and they be permitted to utilize eight feet of land from Plot Nos.337 (part) and 338. Similarly, if eight feet of land is allotted adjoining the cow-shed now constructed and another seven feet of their own land is added thereto, a common road of greater width can be formed so that the plots belonging to the respondents as well as the common amenities belonging to the company under liquidation can both have appropriate access and better utility. 5. I am satisfied that the proposal of the respondents will duly enhance the utility of the common facilities established in the lay out developed by the company under liquidation. Simultaneously, it will also help the respondents to have a decent approach road to their plots. Since the proposal submitted by the respondents is for the mutual benefit of both sides, I consider it appropriate to direct the learned Advocate Commissioner to accept the proposals contained in the representation dated 15.06.2011 submitted by the respondents herein and necessary deed or document may be executed by them in favour of the respondents so as to enable them to execute the requisite works there. 6. The company application stands allowed. No costs. _____________________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao 29-10-2011 SP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO COMPANY APPLICATION No.1002 OF 2011 29-10-2011 SP