IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 2279 of 1991 (O&M) Nihal and another .... Appellants vs State of Haryana .... Respondent Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. J. S. Yadav, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 18/20.11.1988 published on 6.12.1988 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estate of village Ikbalpur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon for construction of Gurgaon Water Supply Channel. The same was followed by notification dated 25.1.1989 published on 28.2.1989 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector') vide his award dated 2.1.1990, assessed the compensation for the acquired land @ ` 45,000/- per acre for chahi, ` 40,000/- per acre for Alabarani, ` 35,000/- per acre for bhood, ` 30,000/- per acre for banjar, and ` 25,000/- per acre gair mumkin kinds of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 60,000/- per acre for chahi and ` 53,200/- per acre for magda kind of land. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 1729 of 1991 – Ram Pal and others vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 24.10.2009. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. 15.11.2010. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge