1 C.S.No.98 of 1991 M.SUNDAR.J., Mr.Achuthananthan of M/s.Pass Associates, learned counsel is present on behalf of the plaintiffs. Mr.Dawood, learned counsel is present on behalf of defendants 17 to 24. Mrs.Chitra Sampath, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.T.S.Baskaran is present on behalf of defendants 26 to 31. 2. Learned counsel for plaintiff states that the papers have been returned to their client as the suit itself has been disposed of. Be that as it may, the learned counsel for the defendants 17 to 24 as well as learned counsel for defendants 26 to 31 have a common grievance. This is a partition suit. Advocate Commissioner was appointed and he filed a report dated 17.10.2005. Thereafter, an application was taken out for passing final decree. The matter was disposed of by a judgment and decree dated 06.04.2010. A perusal of the judgment reveals that properties being Item No.1 in schedule-A of the plaint and Item Nos.1 and 7 of Schedule-B of the plaint alone are the subject matter of the judgment and decree. 3. It is represented by the learned senior counsel as well as the learned counsel for defendants 17-24 that, the remaining items of properties Item Nos.2-8 in Schedule-A have been sold. 4. It is now noticed that certified copies of the final decree furnished by the Registry, has the report of the Advocate Commissioner appended to it but it does not have the plans submitted by the Advocate Commissioner appended to it. It is submitted that these plans alone would clearly bring out the shares which have fallen to the respective parties. Besides this, the schedules for the above said three items of properties have also not been appended to the decree. 2 M.SUNDAR.J., rm 5. Bringing out this to the notice of this Court, all the learned counsel requested the Court to issue directions to the Registry on the administrative side, directing the Registry to append the plan submitted by the Advocate Commissioner alongwith his report dated 17.10.2005 and also to append the schedules of Item No.1 in schedule-A and Item Nos.1 and 7 in Schedule-B to the decree. 6.Accordingly, Registry is directed to redraft the decree on the above lines by making the necessary inclusions setout above and furnish fresh certificated copies of decrees to parties to the suit, who may apply for the same. 7. It is stated at the Bar by the learned senior counsel appearing for defendants 25 to 31 as well as the learned counsel appearing for defendants 17 to 24 that the decree has been given complete legal quitess and there is no appeal or further proceedings assailing the decree. In other words, it is submitted by both counsel that the respective clients have accepted the decree. 8. Considering the nature of the suit and also the fact that the suit is of the year 1991 in which final decree has been passed on 06.04.2010, Registry is directed to complete the above exercise as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within two months from today. 17.11.2016. rm C.S.No.98 of 1991 3 http://www.judis.nic.in