1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1812 OF 2005 Panamtharayil Ahmed Haji Aboobacker ...Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Nusrat Shah with Mr. Parvin Contractor, Mr. K.A. Sayed, Ms. Sarika Gite and Ms. Rupali Kadam for the Petitioner None for the Respondents. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J., & S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE: SPETEMEBR 13, 2005. P.C.:- 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by notice dated 2nd April, 2005 issued by the respondent - Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai - under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to file reply within two weeks from today. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if his reply is considered by the Corporation and a reasoned order is given by the respondent-Corporation. 2 3. We direct the Corporation to decide the matter, by a reasoned order, within six weeks from the date of the receipt of the order. 4. No further directions are necessary, and this petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.