WP(C) 3630/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Ms. N Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. MK Choud hury, learned Standing counsel, Education Department, appearing on behalf of the respondents. It is submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that similarly situated persons, a s the petitioner is, had approached this Court by way of a writ petition, made u nder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which gave rise to WP(C) Nos. 552 2/2007 and 6020/2007, and by judgment and order, dated 26-08-2009, passed therei n, this Court has disposed of the said writ petitions with certain directions gi ven to the State respondents and the petitioner may also be extended the benefit s, which the writ petitioners in WP(C) Nos. 5522/2007 and 6020/2007, may come to enjoy pursuant to the directions given in the judgment and order, dated 26-08-2 009, aforementioned. Considering the matter in its entirety, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can and needs to be disposed of, at the motion stage itself, with appr opriate directions to the respondents to examine the petitioner’s case and ascer tain if the petitioner is similarly situated as the writ petitioners in WP(C) No s. 5522/2007 and 6020/2007, were and if so, the directions given to the responde nts by the judgment and order, dated 26-08-2009, aforementioned, shall govern th e case of the petitioner too. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is dispo sed of with direction to the respondents to examine the petitioner’s case and as certain if the petitioner is situated similarly as the petitioners in WP(C) Nos. 5522/2007 and 6020/2007 and if the petitioner is found to situated similar as t he petitioners in WP(C) Nos. 5522/2007 and 6020/2007, then, the directions given by this Court in the judgment and order, dated 26-08-2009, aforementioned, shal l govern the case of the petitioner too. The consideration of the case of the pe titioner,, as directed hereinbefore, shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2 , namely, Director of Secondary Education, Assam, Kahilipara. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 2, namely, certified copy of this order along wit h a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Whatever decision is taken by the respondents, the same shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitione r and if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be taken b y the respondents or by the order(s), which may be passed by the respondents, th e petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.