IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2010 / 16TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37852 of 2009(B) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MARIYAKUTTY, W/O. ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 46 YEARS, OTHUKKUMPURAM HOUSE, P.O. EDATHANATTUKARA, (VIA) ALANALLUR, MANNARKKAD TALUK - 678 601. BY ADV. MR.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION,K.S.E.B, MANNARKKAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, ALANELLUR POST, MANNARKKAD. 3. VEERAN, S/O. KADER MOLLA, THONIKADAVAN, POST THIRUVAZHAMKUNNU, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. HAMSA, S/O. KUNHAYAMMED HAJI, OTHUKKUMPURATH HOUSE, POST THIRUVAZHAMKUNNU, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR. P.P. THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ----------------------------- W.P(C) No. 37852 of 2009 -E ------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the drawing of the electrical line through her property in Survey No.235A/3B, 279/1, 2 of Kottopadam Village, Mannarkkad Taluk, Palakkad District; stating that the grievance projected by the petitioner before the Authorities of the Kerala State Electricity Board, is not being dealt with properly. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 submits on instructions that the dispute raised by the petitioner is being referred to the concerned authority/ADM for consideration and that the matter can be agitated by the petitioner before the said authority. It is also stated by the learned standing counsel that the line will be drawn only on the basis of the decision to be passed by the said statutory authority. In the above facts and circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of, recording the submission made as above. The W.P(C) No. 37852 of 2009 -E 2 petitioner is at liberty to substantiate his grievance before the statutory authority/ADM in the proceedings, as and when the notice in this regard is served to the petitioner. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge ab