IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 15th October, 2008 Criminal Bail Application No.469 of 2008 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Ramvir S/o Jailal …Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No. 5026 of 2007 Under Sections 302 & 201 I.P.C. P.S. Pantnagar District U.S. Nagar ________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. S. K. Mandal, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State. I have gone through the documents alongwith the bail petition as well as the documents filed alongwith the counter affidavit. It was contended on behalf of the applicant that on 04.11.2007 the first report was lodged without naming the accused persons; on 06.11.2007 the second report was lodged in which it was alleged that on 02.11.2007 the applicant alongwith other co-accused was lastly seen in the company of the deceased, the statements of Raj Pal and Amar Pal were recorded on 30.11.2007 after an inordinate delay; the evidence of these witnesses is not credible and cogent; the chain of the circumstances is not complete against the applicant; and the recovery of ‘Favra’ has not been made at the behest of the present applicant. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (J.S.C. Rawat, J.) Dated 15.10.2008 LSR