IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7826 of 2009 RANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ PUTTA CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the FIR was lodged, petitioner was sent to jail but later was allowed bail, basing the material collected by the I.O. and ultimately final form showing petitioner’s implication false, was submitted. Thereafter on protest this cognizance has been taken. This much of the circumstance only due to opposition cannot be made a ground for petitioner’s arrest. The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.1245 of 2004 arising out of Rohtas P.S. case no.17 of 2003, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram (Rohtas), subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI