IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20886 of 2010 RAM NATH UPADHAYA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 07.01.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Counsel for the State rightly points out from Annexure 4 that there appears to be disputed questions of fact and rival competing claims involved which cannot be adjudicated in the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has already engaged attention of the Sub Divisional Officer, Paliganj and the claim of the petitioner is pending before him. If that be the correct position, the more appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to pursue his pending application before the Sub Divisional Officer. It is expected that any such application, if pending or filed hereinafter, shall be considered expeditiously and disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order, after hearing all concerned including the private persons referred to in Annexure 4 who in any event have not been made party respondent. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)