1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2347/2010 Sanjay Narang and Anr. Applicants Vs. Mahendra Barde & Anr. Respondents Mr.Harshad Bhadbhade for applicants Mr.Sachin Chandan for Respondents Mr.A.S.Gadkari,APP for State CORAM:MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. (VACATION COURT) DATE :14th MAY, 2010. P.C. . This application is moved under section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for compounding the . The complainant has filed private complaint and the process for the offence punishable under sections 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code was issued by the learned Magistrate on 25/1/2000. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants/ accused that during the pendency the parties have settled the matter and the accused have paid Rs.1 lac to the 2 complainant. 2] Learned counsel for the complainant is present He identifies the complainant. 3] Today the complainant Mahendra Barde is present in the Court . He confirms the payment of Rs.1 lac to the satisfaction of his dues against both the accused , in presence of his counsel. He submits that today he does not have any grievance against the accused and he does not want to proceed against them. 4] The application is signed by the learned counsel of both the parties as well as the complainant. Offence punishable under sections 406 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code are compoundable . Hence the application is taken on record. 3 5] In view of this the order issuing process dated 25/1/2000 against the applicants in Criminal complaint no.1/S/2000 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court, Andhri Mumbai as well as the complaint no.1/S/2000 are hereby quashed and set aside. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)