IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CLCON NO. 159 OF 2010 Kirat Pal Singh …..Petitioner. Versus Anil Negi …..Respondent. Present : Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the respondent. By the order dated 7.6.2010, on principle it was held by the Division Bench of this Court that the petitioner ought to have been retired on 30.6.2006. However, the petitioner did not work after 30.6.2006 and thereafter it was directed that no salary shall be paid to the petitioner between 1.4.2004 to 30.6.2006. In effect, therefore, letter dated 21.8.2010 (Annexure no.3 to the Contempt Petition) does not seem to be in violation of this Court’s order dated 7.6.2010, as alleged by the petitioner. In fact it is in compliance with the order of this Court dated 7.6.2010, as now the pension would be re-fixed as per the direction of this Court, and the petitioner would be entitled for pensionary benefits not just till April, 2004 but up to 30.6.2006. The increment liable to be given to the petitioner during this period will also be calculated. It is for this reason the order dated 21.8.2010 has been passed. Since this order is totally in compliance with the order of the Division Bench of this Court dated 7.6.2010. The apprehension of the petitioner is that he will neither be paid salary nor pension between 2004 to 2006 is entirely misplace. The instant contempt petition is totally devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 23.9.2010 Kuldeep