IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10734 of 2010 1. JAIMALA KUMARI W/O JAI KISHORE SINGH R/O VILL.- CHAKIYA, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTT.- VAISHALI, AT PRESENT R/O VILL.- MUZAFFARPUR MALAHI, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI------ -----------------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, DISTRICT- TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VAISHALI AT HAZIPUR 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI AT HAZIPUR 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BHAGWANPUR, VAISHALI AT HAZIPUR 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MAIA BAROW PANCHAYAT BHAGWANPUR, VAISHALI AT HAZIPUR 6. THE MUKHIYA MAIA BAROW PANCHAYAT, BHAGWANPUR, VAISHALI AT HAZIPUR-------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 9.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner challenges the finding given by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Vaishali as contained in annexure-5. His grievance is that in terms of the so called roster contained in annexure-3 there are three posts available for unreserved category for female and only one appointment has been made. The findings given by the appellate authority that two posts were meant for Urdu teacher and that cannot be filled up by the general category without having the requisite qualification does not seem to be apparent from perusal of annexure-3. A reading of impugned order would show that background of the vacancy and the position was verified not only from the Panchayat secretary but even the District Superintendent of Education who had categorically confirmed by letter no. 272 dated 22.4.2010 that two posts out of three under the heading of general category candidate are meant for Urdu teachers for the - 2 - said school and therefore in absence of anybody having requisite qualification in that category no appointments have been made. The petitioner cannot be a claimant for appointment on the post of Urdu teacher not having a requisite qualification of Moulvi. Contention of the petitioner is that such stand cannot be accepted in view of annxure-3. The contention of the petitioner cannot be accepted on the face of it because annexure-3 is not a stand alone document and there is nothing brought on record to show that communication made by the District Superintendent of Education with regard to two of the posts being reserved for Urdu teacher is otherwise belied. In view of same no direction can be given for appointment of the petitioner. No interference is warranted with the order impugned. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)