: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.361 OF 2002 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.361 OF 2002 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.361 OF 2002 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.310 OF 1986 FIRST APPEAL NO.310 OF 1986 FIRST APPEAL NO.310 OF 1986 B.M.Shah and Co. ).. Appellants Versus M/s.V.Tribhovandas ).. Respondents Smt.Monica D’Souza for the Appellants. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 13TH JANUARY 2005 DATED: 13TH JANUARY 2005 DATED: 13TH JANUARY 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By this Letters Patent Appeal, order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court is impugned on the ground that there is non-consideration of certain evidence and such non-consideration requires interference in appellate jurisdiction. With the assistance of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants, we have considered this aspect. What has been done by the learned Judge is specific rejection of certain evidence which, according to the Appellants, was liable to be accepted. In effect, it is pure question of fact. Letters Patent Appeal is not meant for interference on facts. Hence, Appeal dismissed.