1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.319 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (L) NO.689 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.70 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.106 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3275 OF 2004 The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. .. Appellants Vs. S.K. Nanal .. Respondents WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.320 OF 2009 IN APPEAL (L) NO.688 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.171 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.110 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3276 OF 2004 The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. .. Appellants Vs. Capt.D.K.Tewari .. Respondents WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.321 OF 2009 IN 2 APPEAL (L) NO.687 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.69 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.109 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.3414 OF 2004 The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. .. Appellants Vs. S.G.Mistry .. Respondents Ms.Usha Shrivastav i/b M/s.Consulta Juris for the appellants Mr.Zuber Dada a/w Ms.Amruta Ghone i/b M/s.Divya Shah and Associates for respondents CORAM : J. N. PATEL & Smt.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ DATE : 12TH OCTOBER, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notices of motion, we are inclined to condone the delay which is of 15 days but subject to payment of cost in this court which we quantify as Rs.5,000/-. Payment of cost is made condition precedent. Cost to be paid on or before 6.11.2009. Thereafter, appeal be registered and listed for admission. 3 3. We make it clear that we propose to dispose of this appeal at the stage of admission itself. On failure to pay cost, notices of motion would stand dismissed. No further time would be granted for depositing cost in the court. On such cost being deposited, respondents would be entitled to withdraw the same without furnishing surety. ( J. N. Patel, J) (Smt.R.P.Sondurbaldota, J)