IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3716 of 2011(L) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. P.VIDYA, W/O.RETHISH KUMAR, AGED 26 YEARS, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. E.REENA, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI. K.E. HAMSA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001. 4. THE MANAGER, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 005. 5. THE HEADMISTRESS, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 005. 6. SRI.ANSON, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 005. ...2/- WP(C).No. 3716 of 2011(L) -2- 7. SMT.V.ANITHA, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 005. 8. SMT.K.MINIMOL, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 005. 9. SMT.R.JAYALAKSHMI, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, S N V T T INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, LAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 005. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.3716 Of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The issue raised in this Writ Petition is whether the shifting of respondents 6 to 9 by the Manager to the L.P.section of the School is justified. The two petitioners are LPSAs of the 4th respondent-School. They were appointed as LPSA in the year 2004 and 2007 respectively. Exhibit P2 is the proceedings by which respondents 7, 8 and 9 were shifted as LPSA. They entered service as UPSAs. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the proceedings Exhibits P2, P3 and P4 and Exhibits P5 and P6 are the appeals filed by them. It is prayed that the same may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. The petitioners are relying upon Exhibit P7 judgment of this Court which has been confirmed in Writ Appeal No.25 and 26 of 2011. 3. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P5 and P6 after hearing the petitioners and respondents 4 and 6 to 9 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A. to Judge