.?2i^j<3.,........r i-.,..^-•—^••^''J^^J:^^^ 1 p^»,,^,v^g^;;"^ • • ^^ dal^^o-—s—a<'^""<N ^S^^S^— ' ^^—T_ (^ THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT PETITIONER BILASPUR Slngle W. P. S. N0. ^Z?35 OF 2009 Makram Singh Thakur S/o Late Bhagwan Singh Thakur, aged about-72 years, R/o Gharghoda, Tahsil Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Nagriya Prashan and Development Department , D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate, Nagriya Prashan and Development Departinent , Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 4. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat- Gharghoda , Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ZNDIA <. ,^. PETmONER RESPONDENTS HLGHCOURTQF CI-iHATTISGARH:B!LASPUR WR!T PETITION (S) N0. 5039 OF 2009 Makram Singh Thakur Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArtide 226 ofthe Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri M.K.Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents No.1 to 3. Shri Maiay Shrivastava, Advocate forthe respondent No.4. ORDER (Passed on this 01st day of March, 2Q12) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that it Js an admitted posltion on the basis ofcertificate dated 16.01.2006 (Annexure P-1), issued by the respondent No.4 that the petitioner is entitled to a sum of Rs.1,15,176.36. But, the payment has not been made tiil date. The petitioner has also filed succession certificate (Annexure P-2), whereunder, he has b€lendeclared as a supcessor underthe provisions ofthe Indian Succession Act, 1925. i 2. in view ofthat there seems to be po difficuity in releasing the money. Accordingly, the respondents are directed, in particular^respondent No.4< to release the admitted amount forthwith to the petitioner, v^thln a period of six weeks and the respondent No.1 is also directed to ensure the compiiance ofthe order. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge asnoK