<='? HIGHGOURTOFCHHATTiSGARHATBIl.ASPUR Division Behch , Goram : Hon'bleShnJagdish Bhalla,^eting C.J. & Hon'bleShriDilipRaosahebDeshmukh,,J, ll,il!;' 1 . ReviewPetjtion Mo.53 of2007 Petitioner Respondent M/s Raj Gonstruction, Station Road, Duig(C.G.) versus Commissionerof Income Tax, Raipur Petition under Chapter VI Rule 75 of the Hiah Court of Chjiattisaarh Rules.2005 Present : Shrj Asllol<Patil, cpunselforthe petitioner. Slli'rAmjt^GhOudhary.Bounselfprtherespondent. OR&L0RDER (PasSed6ffi24thAugust,2007) The N'owjng pral order of the Gourt was p^^ :by Hon'BleShriJagdishBhalla,ActingChiefJustice; Heard on I.A,No.2, an application for condonation of delay in filingthe Feviewpetition. Theground mentioned intheapplicationforcpndonationofdelay issufficient. . • :: :1.' /::. ''• : ; : ::': ::' : \ "'^' . Leamedcounselfcrtherespondentdoesnothayeanyobj'sctiion if the delay is condoned. Accordingly, I.A.No.2 is allowed ahdthe.delayinfilingthereview petition is condoned, ' Also heard on admission. ' S:.i 1:1 ^^^j ^^••w •^•^S- BIB; Leamedcounselfbrthepetitionercoulclnotpointoutanyerror apparenton the face of record. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- Acting Chief Justice ,.„_ sdA OaipRaosahebDeshniukh Judge ~~--< ^,.1 iUIS iliillS iiiir a»."