IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 33537 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BINSON, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.JOSE, PULLEN HOUSE, THRIKKARIYOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY SRI.R.RAJASREE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J ------------------- W.P.(C).33537/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner appeared for the First Professional BDS Examination conducted by the Mahatma Gandhi University in June 2009. The results were published in October 2009. Ext.P1 mark list dated 23.10.2009 was thereupon issued. The petitioner failed in the paper “Human Anatomy including “Embryology and Histology”. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 application dated 7.11.2009 seeking revaluation of his answer script. The requisite fee was also paid as can be seen from Ext.P3. The petitioner submits that he had done well in the examination and that he is sure to secure a pass if his answer scripts is revalued. He submits that without passing the first year examination he cannot appear for the second year BDS examination, that if revaluation is expeditiously conducted and he fails to clear the said paper, even after revaluation, he can appear for the supplementary examination before the second year examination commences. On these grounds he seeks expeditious revaluation of his answer script. 2. Sri.T.A.Shaji, the learned standing counsel appearing for W.P.(C).33537/09 2 the Mahatma Gandhi University submits that if the petitioner's application for revaluation is in order, the University will take expeditious steps to revalue his answer script and to communicate result to the petitioner. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioner's answer script described in Ext.P2 application revalued and to communicate the result to him expeditiously and in any event within two months from the date on which the petitioner produces a certified copy of this judgment before the second respondent. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge mrcs