IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28444 of 2011 1.Sitaram Singh S/o late Sidheshwar Singh @ Bhatu Mahto 2.Neeraj Kumar S/o Sitaram Singh Both are resident of village-Ghabhtal, Akhara Road, P.S.-Danapuar, District- Patna. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 26.8.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance for the offence punishable under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that money was not advanced for sale to the petitioners. As a matter of fact, the land in question belongs to co-accused Shakuntala Devi and admittedly she had received money. It is further submitted that from paragraph 10 of the complaint it would transpire that more than 16 Kathas of land have already been transferred either to the complainant or on his instruction in the name of some other persons. The complainant, however, alleges that rest 14 Kathas of land has not been transferred in his name as agreed between the parties. Learned counsel for petitioners, thus, states that on admitted fact of the complainant no offence under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code would be made out. He further submits that at best it would be a dispute of civil nature. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, namely, Sitaram Singh and Neeraj Kumar in the event of 2 their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Tr. No.1061 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No.523(C) of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)