IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 121 of 2010 Vipra Singh ……… Petitioner. Versus U.P. Co-operative Federation, Lucknow and others .……. Respondents. Mr. J.C. Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Beena Pandey, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Mr. J.P. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 5. Date of Judgment: 02.07.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are agreed, that the controversy raised in the instant writ petition be allowed in terms of the order passed by this Court in U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. and another versus Uttaranchal State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd. and others (Special Appeal No. 229 of 2009, decided on 14.05.2010). It is further agreed, that in so far as the implementation of the Fifth and Sixth Pay Commission’s reports are concerned, benefits thereof will flow to the petitioner, only in case respondent Nos. 1 and 4 adopt the reports and give effect to the same. In such a situation, the petitioner will also be entitled to monetary benefits as are released to persons similarly situated as the petitioner, on the basis of the said reports. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as agreed to in the foregoing paragraph. (V.K. Bist, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 02.07.2010 02.07.2010 Amit