1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. No.2922/2007 M/s. G. K. Enterprises Vs. M/s. Sadodaya Builders Pvt. Ltd. and 3 others. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 05/06/2008. Heard Mr. Denge, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Dangre, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant takes exception to the order dated 10.1.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Criminal Revision No.358/2005 allowing revision application against an order dated 8.3.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur in Criminal Complaint Case No.600/02. The applicant filed the above criminal complaint alleging commission of several offences against the respondent. The Magistrate issued process under Sections 406, 418, 420 and 426 of the Indian Penal Code. Against the said order, the respondents preferred revision which came to be allowed by the Revision Court. 2 At the out set, it is to be noted that against the order passed by the Revisional Court at the instance of the respondent, Revision at the instance of the applicant is maintainable under Section 399(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure. It is settled law that in case revision is maintainable this Court ordinarily should not exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant fairly submitted that the revision to this Court is maintainable against the order of Revisional Court. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused records, I find no case has been made out for interference by this Court. On merits, I find that the dispute between the parties is of civil nature and the Revisional Court was right in holding that the offences for which Magistrate had issued process against the respondents were not made out on the basis of complaint, verification statement as well as on the basis of the report called under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In my opinion, no case is made out for interference by this Court. Hence, the application is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Ambulkar.