THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.20741 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner who claims to be a resident of Mutyalampadu, Vijayawada, filed this writ petition aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 3 in considering the objections raised by him against the proposed establishment of a Bar & Restaurant by the 4th respondent in Ward No.21 of Mutyalampadu, Vijayawada. The learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise, under instructions, states that so far no such licence has been granted in favour of the 4th respondent. Having regard to the nature of the controversy, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 and 3 to consider the objections raised by the petitioner in his representation dated 17.6.2006 before granting permission in favour of the 4th respondent to establish a Bar & Restaurant in the premises in question. Needless to mention that the 4th respondent shall be given an opportunity to explain the allegations made by the petitioner in his representation dated 17.6.2006 before taking appropriate decision. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 11th October, 2006. Issue CC by tomorrow. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.20741 OF 2006 11th October, 2006. Between: Gottumukkala Venkateswara Raju. .. Petitioner. And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Revenue (Excise) Department, represented by its Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Excise Buildings, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents.