1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6673/2010. (Dilipsingh Pardeshi Vs. The State of Mah. and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SK Adkine, ADv. for petitioner; Mr.KS Patil, Adv. for Resp.Nos. 1 to 5; Mr.SV Natu, Adv. for Resp.Nos. 6 and 7. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 28 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The controversy revolves to an access from the land Gut No.94. The writ petitioner has in his occupation northern portion while the respondents, his cousin, has southern portion. It is curious, by virtue of sale-deed dated 7.8.1985, the writ petitioner and the respondents jointly purchased the area of access from owners of land Gut Nos. 100 and 93/1. There is no controversy to this. The writ petitioner has indeed at the western side of portion of his land touching the boundary mark has laid a cart track. The grievance of the respondent is, since the arrangement was between the landlords of Gut No.94/1; 2 94/2 and the respondents, the respondent is eligible to enjoy the said access for approaching the main road. 3) The Revenue authorities having indicated existence of such cart track from the boundary line of land Gut No.94 and 93/1, on perusal of the relevant maps, I do not find any infirmity in the order under challenge. The order does not warrant any interference. Writ Petition lacks merit, dismissed. No costs. 4) CA also dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/