IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7988 of 2010 1. ANITA KUMARI W/O SRI SANJAY KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL.+P.O.- SONBARSA, PANCHAYAT- BASIHAN, P.S. & BLOCK- PANAPUR, DISTT.- SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER, SARAN DIVISION, SARAN 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARAN 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MARHAURA, DISTT.- SARAN 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANAPUR 5. THE SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BASIHAN, P.S.+BLOCK- PANAPUR, DISTT.- SARAN 6. ANJU DEVI W/O................. R/O VILL.+P.O.- SONBARSA, PANCHAYAT BASIHAN, P.S. AND BLOCK PANAPUR, DISTT.- SARAN ----------- 2 01.03.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of respondent no.6 as Secretary, Gram Kachahary on the ground that the respondent was wife of the younger brother of the Surpanch and the petitioner had more marks than her. In this respect, petitioner has filed representation before all the authorities and she has also filed representation before the Collector, Chapra, as evident from Annexure-4 and 5 series. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Chapra to consider the representation of the petitioner, if necessary, call for the records and after hearing the parties to pass speaking orders 2 on the representation of the petitioner, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)