IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 158/2011 BABURAO BONGIRWAR ..VS.. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL MAH AND ANOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.A. Patait, adv for petitioner Smt. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent no.1 and 2 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 2 nd August, 2011 . By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal on 9.6.2010 in O.A.No.266/2005. It is the grievance of the petitioner that credit of amount of Rs.825.70 was not given to the petitioner in his G.P.F. Account. According to the petitioner though a sum of Rs.825.75 ought to have been credited to the G.P.F. Account of the petitioner in March - April 1970 the said amount was not credited. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal rightly dismissed the original application filed by the petitioner as the petitioner had raised the objection about the missing credit entry of Rs.825.70 for the first time after his retirement. The objection was belatedly raised after a period of almost 35 years. Though it was necessary for the petitioner to implead the Executive Engineer P.W.D. Chandrapur and the Chief Engineer P.W.D. Nagpur for ascertaining the position in regard to the missing credit entry, they are not joined as party respondents. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal rightly observed that the question of non deposit of amount of Rs.825.70 was not capable of adjudication in the absence of the relevant record and the concerned officers before the Tribunal. The Tribunal also observed that the amount involved in the case was meager and since the objection was belatedly raised after the retirement of the petitioner from service, the original application was liable to be dismissed. The order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal appears to be just and proper and calls for no interference. The writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE SMP