IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1645 of 2006 CHANDRAJIT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 13.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Not only from the pleadings and the evidence brought on record but on reading of annexure-3 i. e. advertisement issued by the committee known as Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, a project funded by the Central Government, the employment in question is on a contractual basis. It is not a permanent appointment under or by the State. The petitioner is basing his claim for appointment on the basis of his earlier engagement by a Committee not having any statutory basis and not being part or limb of the State. The recruitment was carried out in terms of annexure-3 and if the petitioner was not found suitable vis-à-vis other candidates, it is not a case of violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. No direction can be issued by the Court to consider the case of petitioner for appointment. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)