[BW c^ \0^n /-" BE IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (SUiO. '^ / 2009 RESPONDENTS ,6°''.e?yy -^•' PETITIONER : Hari Govind Mishra, S/o Late Shri Rainnath Mishra, Aged about 63 years, Retd. Agriculture Development Officer (Soil Conservation) R/o Ganga Nagar Ward, Geedam Road, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar-(C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaiy, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Asst. Soil Conservation Officer, Dharampura No.l, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar-fC.G.) 3) The Accountant General, Accountant General C.G. Raipur, WRIT PETITION U/A 226 8s 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQNOF INDIA ^k) IGH COURT OF TTSSGARi 'U! WniPet!tioniSlNo,.S835 sfK :T!T!ONER Hsri Govind Mishra Versus State of Chhattisgam & Others (A'rit Petition under Articie 226 & 227 of the Constituiion of India; iingls Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, u. Pressnt; S.hrl Prafuil Bharat. Gounssl forths Dstit'onfir. Shri N.N. Roy, Pansl Lavvyer for Ihe Staie. Pradhan, standine counsei Tor the Union Shri R. tALi OR ied on thls 23' With the consent of isarned counsei for {he parties, ths petition is heardfinaily. This csse psrtains to grievance of non-grant of r.etirai dues. This Court, in the matter ofW.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connscted matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter o* retriai dues as the disputed auestion offacts were invoived. The Committes was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs.-State Government of Chhsttlsgarh and othsrs). and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in ^'1 ^ f~ hJ^. 'IH^ n-? Onn.O f'^f£a*a '^f r'hh-a'N-xs-.-Bfh 'srsrf ..^hsrQ ^fo :Raii"a*h IVI.u'.tu'. s''10. 1 U3 Vi ^.UiJO IOS.idi.65 Ui ^HHeiUiSysai.H a^^U iJlHt=Ei3 .VS. ,L3siljt«ai.i'i Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and ordsr dated 31 January, 2008 passed in W.P.No, 4642/2004 (Bsijnath Mandai (suprs) as sybmlttsd by leamedicounsei spp9cfin9 ^or ^6 psrtiss. 'his petitlon is accordlngly. disposed of in the sarne terms i.e., ths office ofthe Advocaie Genera! is directed to send the case to the Committee, -2-— Uown •tViihin a Deriod of 15 davs from ths date of receiot of a copv ofthis order. Thereafter, ths CommiSee shaii issue notics to ths petitioner and officers concernsd within a further period of 15 days. The Commltiee shail consider and pass order, In accordance v/ith iaw, after affording proper opportunlty of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the ofncers concerned mav fi!e additionai documents, if necessarv. The entire exereise, Jnciuding payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed withln a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copyofthis order. The petitionsr shaii suppiy one compiete set of the petltion to the State counsei as well ss counsel for the Union of Indis for transferring the sams to the Committee. ; In case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensioner;/ dues, it is not necessar/ to file a writ petitlon before this Court directly. The representation/appiication can be moved before the Pension Corr-.mittee as sisted above. The Pension Committee shai! not refuse to entertain the representation/application, if so filed directly. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ____