CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10000 OF 2000 ---- In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procledure,1973. ---- REVATI RAMAN THAKUR SON OF LATE RAMKRISHNA THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARSARMA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. AGNI KUMAR SINGH SON OF MAHESHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARSARMA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. 3. VIJAY KUMAR SINGH @ MOHAN SINGH SON OF GANGA SINGH OF VILLAGE HARIHARPUR, P.S. KALUAHI, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. 4. MANOJ KUMAR SINGH SON OF AGNI SINGH OF VILLAGE PARSARMA, P.S. AND SITRICT SUPAUL. 5. VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SON OF SHALIGRAM SINGH OF VILLAGE SIMRI, P.S. GANGOL, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 6. DILIP KUMAR SINGH SON OF SHYAM SUNDER SINGH OF VILLAGE PARSARMA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. 7. SUDHA SHARAN SHUKLA SON OF LATE SHATRUGHAN SHUKLA OF VILLAGE PARSARMA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. 8. DURGA CHOUDHARY SON OF LATE KAMAL CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF PURAB BAJAR, WARD NO.11, SAHARSA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SAHARSA. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mrs.Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. For O.P. Nos.2 to 8 : Mr. B.N.P. Singh, Adv. ---- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ---- Rakesh Kumar,J. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of an order dated 13.1.2000 passed in Complaint Case No.223(c) of 1997 by Shri Ram Sristi Singh, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul. 2 2. The petitioner, whose complaint was rejected by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Complaint Case No.223 (c) of 1997, which was filed for an occurrence taken place in between 3.3.1994 and 14.12.1996, approached this Court for quashing of the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate rejecting the complaint petition. 3. I have perused the materials available on record. I do not find any material in the case warranting exercise of inherent jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner that too, after lapse of such a long time. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 2.8.2010 N.A.F.R./N.H.