aA^ ^ s? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. £3^3 OF 2010. PETITIONERS /^ta:!^, :1. Ajay Nath Patel,. S/o. Shri Ram Raj Patel, aged about 52 years, Head Master, Upper Primary School Kumhada Kota, Block - Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) 2. Ram Bhaskare Mishra, S/o. Shri D. N. Mishra, aged about 58 years, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School Bastar, Block ~ Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) 3. Sona Das Manikpuri, S/o. Shri Jethu Das Manikpuri, aged about 58 years, Head Master, Upper Primary School Usari, Block -Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) 4. Smt. Ram Mani Goyal, W/o. late Shri R. S. Goyal, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Takraguda, Block -Bastar, District Raipur (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^i -^^ |_ /N ,j§BS| |< ^-^fC Ifi^^HC—78 NTHdT ^»^ira» ^Sf "4|^|<^^ ^ft^FT^, [s|dl-ylj,< ^...U...&..^....^;....6^<, ^T^T TT5RR> ( yif^<^) 3TI^F "^T ^Job ^T 3??T^T^FRfcF 'e'^rwc IR^T 33ni^ SB : HON?BLE MR. JUSTECE PRI 29J.0.2010 Shri Somkaxit VeiiBa, couns] Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.| Gri.evan.ee of the petitioner^ that they were appoin.ted a.s Assi.^tHB.t Tea-chers on. a fixed pay scale of Rs, 100-150 for a pe^od of two years and after corQ.pletion of probation, tti.ey wer^ granted. regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Conteution of fhe counsel f(] are entitied for regular pay scalej iaitial appom-'taient aiid fh.eir c^se is sqiiarely covered with number of decisions ^ passed b^ <sM^F<n<4li <RP:?^ff ^ f^^t <I^i^i< i?^Rw^ii^T 1HKER DIWAKBR pl for tta.e petitioners, ^ for fhe State. " in th.e prcsent peti.tion are )T the petitioners is that they wi.th effect frora fh.e date of judgment rendered by the M,P. c Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 |M Vs. State of.M.P. & Othersj.w: k tliis Court aiid -also the Itate Adra.iaistrative Tribunal, adhixkaat Yadii & 56 Otfeers lerein it has been 'held th.at similarly placed teachers- are enti1|led for regular pay scale fro.nl tlie date oftheir iiiitial appoiiitiiieil It is not disputed by botli flj taken up by tlie State to fhe Apex disniissed 'by the Apex Court iiJ5holdi2ig the decisioa of the Tribunal to the effect fliat flie Te^ enti.tl.ed for regul.ai' .pay scale fi\ ,t. ie paities fh.at the matter was Oourt biit fhe appeal was also .chers/Assistant Teachers are om fhe date of their ini.ti.al appoiiitm.ent. Ixi view of the above subm.i^sion iiia.de by the counsel for flie parties; the petition is disposejd. ofin the saoie teiiBS i.e. tlie petitioners are graated Mbeity to m.ake a representa.ti.on., if so XI-HC—78 ~S^ '^(f^^^, ^tWTS, f®ldl-^ll,< ^_^ _»»....U:.£)i:...<^>.^....GN^:...63?^l(J3- WR^T ^,i^^ "--—"•"—^ 200 3^1 'q^T (^c|^<^T) ^ ^^ "^T Rs'iich WT ^in^TgR^W ^wiW tif^a 3n^?T aforesiud advised, in. the Mght of th-e dated 27.12.2008 (Annexure P/' I'espondeiit is directed to considej aiid ni its perspective. If tlie p( footing as per order passed by ttj( in Madhukaxit Ya.du (supra) .an.d Supreisie Court io. Special Leave order dated 3.1.1995, the reMef accoxdingly, It is expected froni the sta.j order after due scnitiny of tlie fac|ts petitio|o.ers ju.dgme.nt aii.d the circiil.ar || aB,d in tum, fiie conceiTi.ed ^ their ca.se on its own m.eri.ts Kitioners staad on the sajne le State Admmistrate Tribunal ^ibsequently confinsied "by the j:>etition (Civil) No. 6892/93 by niay be entitled to same ^i^(<n<fli ^TR^ff ^ 'fe^t if^l^K iT^tfw^n^r :e authorities to pass suitable Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge