IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 12384 of 2004 Between: 1 D. Prasanna S/o. D.K. Veerabhadrappa Pedapalli (p) Puttaparthy (M), Anantapur District. 2 K. Yogendrakumar, S/o. ;C. Raja Rao Pedapalli (p) Puttaparthy (M), Anantapur District. 3 G. Arunakumari D/o. G. Narayana Swamy Pedapalli (p) Puttaparthy (M), Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Managing Director & Vice Chairman, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur Region, Anantapur , Anantapur District. 3 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Uravakonda Bus Depot, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ Order or direction or writ more particular one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings No. P2/255(1)/99-RM-A, Dt. 17.2.1999 by treating the petitioners services as daily wage basis instead of regular conductors is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently set aside the proceedings No. P2/255(1)/99-RM-A, dt. 17-2-1999, issued by the 2nd respondent in so far as treating the petitioners appointments as conductor Gr-II on daily wages basis and direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners from the date of their completion of 240 days in pursuance of the circular No. PD-30/1997, DATED 24.4.1977 issued by the corporation. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.Y.VIVEKANANDA SWAMY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.12384 of 2004 ORDER: Sri A. Veerasekhar Rao representing Sri.G. Ravi Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ Justice G. Chandraiah Date:12-06-2008 mrb