IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2008 / 7TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 19833 of 2006(J) -------------------------- OS.459/1999 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------ RUKHIYA A.A., AGED 61 YEARS,W/O.LATE MANU, KOTTAPURATH HOUSE, KAITHAKKAL DESOM, THALIKKULAM VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.K. SAJEEV RESPONDENTS: ------------- VYPARAVIJAYAM CHITS & LOANS (KERALA) (P) LTD.,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C)19833/06 APPENDIX PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION DATED 25.1.2003 IN E.P.50/03 IN O.S. 459/99 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR. EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE SALE PROCLAMATION DATED 6.10.2005 IN E.P.50/03 IN O.S. 459/99 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR. EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION E.A. 757/06 IN E.P. 50/03 IN O.S. 459/99 DATED 4.4.06 ON THE FILES OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR. RESPONDENT’S EXHIBITS:- NIL OKB/- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 19833 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT As per order dated 27.7.2006, while admitting the petition, petitioner was directed to deposit Rs.1,00,000/- before the executing Court, within three months from 27.7.2006. Petitioner did not deposit the amount even after further time was granted by the Court. Later on the representation that matter could be settled between the parties if the case is referred to Permanent Lok Adalath, writ petition was referred to High Court Permanent Lok Adalath. From the Lok Adalath it was agreed that petitioner would pay the amount fixed to the decree holder and on receipt of the amount, attachment would be released. Petitioner did not comply with the conditions in the settlement deed. Therefore the Lok Adalath returned the case to this Court. As petitioner did not comply with the order passed by this Court, inspite of the opportunity granted, writ petition is dismissed. M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE Okb/-