IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.W.J.C. No. 1989 of 2008 Shanti Devi, wife of Late Satyadeo Sharma, Resident of Village-Nowama, P.S.-Asthawan,District-Nalanda..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda. 7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Nalanda. 8. The Headmaster-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Middle School, Badi, P.S.- Katari Sarai,District-Nalanda. 9. Kalyani Devi, D/o Late Saryug Pandey, r/o Village-Barhgoan, P.S.- Nalanda, District-Nalanda. ……………Respondents. ----------- 5. 05. 05. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State as also Respondent No. 9 who have been filed respective counter affidavits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of her grievances as raised in the writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent No.6. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks along with certified copy of present order, Respondent No.6 shall consider the same and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. - 2 - On receipt of such representation, Respondent No. 9 will also be given at liberty to file her representation before Respondent No.6 along with supporting documents if any. With the above observations/directions, the writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)