IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 89 of 2011(W) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.34581/2010 Dated 09/12/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- SHEEJA P.R., W/O.V.MANOJ KUMAR, CHEMBAKASSERI, CHANGANKULANGARA, OCHIRA (P.O), KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED SRI.S.VIJI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695001. 2. SMITHA P., PADINJARE CHARUVILA VEEDU, EZHUKONE (P.O), KOLLAM, PIN 691 505. ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC, PSC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ----------------------------------- R.P.No.89 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No.34581 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2011 O R D E R In the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Nair Service Society vs. District Officer, Kerala Public Service Commission (2003 (3) KLT 1126 (SC)), I am of the view that the contentions raised in the Review Petition are not sustainable. The learned counsel for the Review Petitioner laid emphasis on paragraph 23 of the judgment of the Supreme Court and contended that the Review Petitioner is entitled to the reliefs prayed for in the Review Petition. On a reading of the judgment of the Supreme Court, I do not think that the petitioner is right. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE csl