-z iGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR WntPgtjtionJSl.No^TO^iLZSOZ Petitioners 1. 2. 3. 4. <-B 5. 6. Tikaram Verma S/o. Shri Ledgu Ram Verma Age about 37 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt; Primary Schooi, Rewa.Block-Arang, Distt. -RaJpyr(G.G.) Smt. Mukti Bais W/o. Shri Rajesh Bais Age about 37 years, Asstt. Teacher, Bramhan Para Girls Primary School, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.)^ , Kamta Prasad Sahu S/o Late Shri Paras Ram Sahu Age about 38 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle SchQOl, Nagpura, Block - Arang,Distt.-Raipur<C.G.) Fagu Ram Dewangah S/o Shri Makhan Lal Dewangan Age about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Mokhla, Block - Arang,Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) Mohan Lal Yaday S/o Shri Bhukhan Lal Yadav Age about 38 yeare, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Barbanda, Block - Dharsinva,Distt.-Raipur(G.Q.) Vijay KumarVerma S/o Shri Gopal Singh Age about 36 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govl. Middle School, Rlwa, Distt. - Ralpur (C.G^ Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Seoretary School Educatibn Department Ministry, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Edycation Offlcer, Raipur (pGY^. .':.'. -^'. (WrjtPetitJonunderArticle226oftheConstifa;tionoflndia) Sinaie Bench: Hon'bSe Justice Satish K. Annihotri Present:ShriAjayShrivastava,counse!forthepetitioriers. Shrit^shwant SinghThakur,Govt.Adwcafef6rthe Stete/respondents; ^ QRDEfi (Passed on 2"" J'uiy, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as welt as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law invoived in the presenf writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa] Vs.Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another {200S (IS) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counse! appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submisslon. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition Is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpa! Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed Examination CerSificate.on their own sxpenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether they have been paid hvo advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sadsh K.Agnihotri ^^^^''^udge .