Ba>. !f6 HIGH <30URT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILAl UR Contemot Petitlon No. 12/2008 SB: HOM-'BLE SHRI DHIRBHDRA MISHRA.J. PBTITIOMER RESPONDBMTS CONTEMWBRS Smt. Shashikala Bhagat, aged about 42 }rears, wifc of Shri Nagcshwar Raia Bhagat, Assistaut Teacher, Qovemment Girite Prixaary School, Jashpur, District Jashpur (CG) VBRSXI8 1. Mr. Nand Kiunar, Secretaiy, Deptt. of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Shri Yogesh ShuMa, Dtett. Mucation OfBcer, Datrict Jashpur (CG) ORAL ORDBR 2-4-2008 ShriA.N. Bhakta, Advocate, for fhe petitioner. Shri Pasksg SIuwaste.va, Advocate, for fhe respondents. Repty has been filed by fhe respoDdents and ia the above repfy, it has been stated fhat the amount payable to fhe persons in compUance of the order of this Coiut has ahieady been paid by thc State vMe Cheque datcd 4-2-2008. Since the Bank accoiuit nuiaber of the petitioncr was uot availabfc wifh the authorities, therefore, the same could not be deposited in her bank accoiait On thc other hand, leamed counsel for the pctitioner submits that fioia fhe repfy, it appears that fhe pedtioner has been paid only Rs. 14,684,00 however, the basis on which the above ainount has becn computed has not been fumished in the repfy and ftiere is soiae discrepancies in calculating the amoiuit. Be fhat as It may, fhe petitioner is at liberty to denaand thc account slip fiom fhe respondents on the basis ofwtuch, payiaent has been laade to her aud on such deinand beiug made, the respondeuts are obl%ed to fumish the details of calculatioa on the basis ofwliich fhe amount has beeu paid to fhe petitioneT. Wifh fliese observations, the petition is disposed o£ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge .~.;.;:.w^'.,' ;\!.