IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.19175 of 2007 Between: M/s.Parandhama Fruit Products, Kammapalle Village, Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor District, Rep by its Managing Partner V. Parandhama Naidu ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Head Office, 5-9-194, Chirag-Ali-Lane, Hyderabad, 2 The Deputy General Manager, Operations Zone-III The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, 3 The Senior Branch Manager, The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, P.B.No.107, Door No. 2-2-388-B, Narasimha Theertham Road, Balaji Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the letter dt. 30-3-2007 of the respondents is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently to direct the respondents to reconsider the letter dt. 30-3- 2007 of the respondents and further declare the letter dt. 11-5-2007 of the respondents as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.RAJENDRA BUSSA Counsel for the Respondents.: MR.Y.V.RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.M.P.No.10870 of 2009 stating that the matter is settled out of the Court and that it has paid the loan amount to the Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, and therefore it may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation denied the payment of loan amount by the petitioner, but, however, stated that he has no objection for withdrawal of the writ petition. In view of the same, permission is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, without taking into consideration the affidavit filed by it in W.P.M.P.No.10870 of 2009. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, the interim order dated 27.12.2007 passed in W.P.M.P.No.29832 of 2007 stands vacated. N.V.RAMANA, J Dt.24.04.2009 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow B/o. va/msv