1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 143 /2005 (Sangita @ Nirmala w/o vijaykumar Mishra vs. Vijay Mishra ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 13 th June, 2011. Heard Mr Vyas, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr R S Kurekar, for respondent. By this revision application under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant challenged the legality, propriety and correctness of the impugned judgment and order dated 13th May, 2005 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nagpur as common judgment in respect of Petition No. A-405/2003 as well as Petition No. E- 39/2000. The learned Principal Judge of the Family Court was pleased to allow the Petition No. A-405/2003 and as the result, the marriage which was solemnised between the applicant and respondent came to be declared null and void. Simultaneously the claim for maintenance made in Petition No. E-39/2000 was also rejected. It is not in dispute that the First Appeal No.355/2005 challenging the decree of nullity before this Court came to be dismissed in default on 18.10.2010. Under these circumstances since the First 2 Appeal was dismissed and no step was taken by the applicant herein for restoration thereof, nothing would survive in this Revision Application, to be decided. However, the applicant shall be at liberty to apply for maintenance on the ground that divorced wife is entitled to claim maintenance till her re-marriage by a separate petition for maintenance before the Family Court concerned. With the above observation, the Revision is disposed of. JUDGE Sahare