SB; •e:-:t.^^i"- SS'SLICtS'Ss BBP08E HAOHS& PRaaSSHSS&'S; ABSXHBSfiAaZVB a'BIBUN&fc 3MSS3& e»ft«H9» SaBtesh Kuiaa.c Malaiya sea ®f<3» i» Halsa.ya,(. aboat 45 yesse^ Attacli''0£ficer* Divisien tla» l Aitinaaagar Te&s.il Katfh®rait I&stt. Silasgur# M«P» Ban aESPONDElSISt 1:» Ststa ®fBa^bya Pradesh thraugh secr]ataxy» Bepartaient @f XrrAgatioa liral.labb Bbava» Bbapal* ©, 2» Chief Sngiaeer^ ilasaee Bang®,E>£<»jeet», 8JLlaspar» M»1P« Aj» SulB-DAvis.lsB Offlcer Hasdee BSaga 0am SulB-BlvisleB M®iS KactaadolAi ss&liicwsioa vso'es. ssc'ciw_i9 w Kaiisis'saAXs.vs 's&isvsKbs -ACS» ; l$6S^-. '~-'-~- - -~ - - - ^: /'> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WR1T PETITION (S) N0.854/2005 S Santosh Kumar Malviya Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others RESPONDENTS Sinale Bench: Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Pane! Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 17 day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing tivice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith.