IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION ( MAIN ) NO. 222 OF 2007 SHRI. DWARKANATH BHIKAJI GOVEKAR ... Appellant Versus SHRI. VIJAY GOVEKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for respondent No.1. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE, J. Date:- 31st January, 2008 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This criminal misc. application challenges the Judgment and Order dated 6.7.2007 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Panaji in Criminal Revision Application No. 22/2007 by which the Judgment and Order passed by the Dy. Collector and S.D.M., has been confirmed. These proceedings are arising from a complaint filed by respondent No.1 under Section 145 Cr.P.C. In the said proceedings, the Dy. Collector and S.D.O. vide his Judgment and Order dated 21st March, 2007 declared that both, the petitioner and respondent No.1, are in possession of the half property each and their possession shall not be disturbed unless evicted by due process of law. It is specifically held that respondent No.1 is in possession of half of the property bearing Survey No.336/3 of Village Mandrem on the western side and the petitioner is in possession of the half of the said property on the eastern side. 2. Considering the nature of the order and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgments in exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. It is, however, open for the parties to approach the appropriate Court/Authority to establish their rights in the property. This application is disposed of accordingly. D. B. BHOSALE, J. ssm.