v—^/ ^}'>:']^t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BHLASPUR, CHHATTISGARH y WRIT PETITION N0. sS -3 ^ of 2005 PETITIONER Smt. Tara -Yadav, W/o Mangal Ram Yadav, Aged about 40 years, R/o Rampur, Post Tanakhar, Tehsil Khatghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). Versus ll»lt RESPONDENTS ^/ 'y.^tu, ^L V.".-''Ll.S^ .. -f^y^ ••„'.¥•?•'' .•»•'' ^^s>^ ^-^5.-- ^5^^ .••' 4; ./ State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Women and Child Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(Chhattisgarh) Collector, Korba (C.G.). District Women & Child Welfare Officer, Korba(C.G.). Project Officer, Integrated Child Welfare Project, Podi, Uproda, District Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As per the cause title above. B Kl' 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: - As per the cause title above. ^•^""•" .• 'JA-« ••- he- ^\^-&-7^,i -•<.• ^ ^/'y' '(BAOUI3J JOJ 3jn] pouSndiui Aq SSOIAJSS LUOJJ ps^BUiiujsi ^ 3qi ur jndtusy 'jsiaso ipBquBSBy jp v\ sqs 3Hq& pspueq p3j tqSnso SBM jsuoil seq :l qoiqM u; s^uspuodssj svft jo JIBqsq) sqi ^suiBSB si japjo psuSnduii Siy pu^ jo;[ psssai si jspjo fvvff urajsqi 8umoi^u3iu 4 sqt jo S30IA.I3S gqf ps^Buiuus^ Aiinbus A| p5fOJ(j-|7'ON }U3pUOdS3J Lpiq&Y UO J3U< •e apBui 'jsuoppsd sqf q;(M suopBpJ [BOII^IUI siuos eOOS'ST'Oe "O 'SJBSA 9T }eB[ so^ IRBqUESV 8B §Up[JOA SB.<& 3qg IBqj SI J3[ •sopsnf 1'ejn^BU jo ssidi( ussq SBq japjo p3uSndu.it sqi pus Aimt] jo A)iunijoddo Au^ guipjojjs }notpiM gjj 'Bpojdfi 'ipOij 'iosfojj SJBJPAV PIiqo P( ^uapuodssj Aq psiBuiuus^ ussq s^q jsuc) ui ''eqjo^i :OU}S(Q 'Bjoqg^B^; I?sq3X 's.nua:)) SB 3UI1{JOA\ SVM. oq&l 'JSUOpRSd 3Lp Ai} 3L[^ jo issodeip {BUIJ joj S3pJ13d 3Lp J0j| •siuspuodssj sqi }o JfBqaq uo pspj 131'8;g 3q} JOJ SlBOOApy lySUIUJSACH]: 'jsuoRpad sq'( joj s^BOOApy 'I^t l^ltph&jKM^ Vl^ltj-k p,&) (t ^.lltlhl-VaBjfc.ltb 3300jd 3Vft 3UIA\0({OJ J31JB JSpJO !BM sqs 'sjojsjaq; pu'e 33B((iA &{'BQ 3qi 3ui{p8 AlIBSsUI SB&t pad sqi •)Bip psuopusui ussq uo p3{lj ussq seq A(dsy •soitenf\-ejnfT3vi jo g3(dpuud 331(00 sq; jo uopon.qsui sqi uo ;spjo psugndiui spiA jsuoppsd UB Suipnpuoo tnoqiiM JSOIJJQ )pp3d sqi ^sureSe }ure(dmoo JUIABq 3J3A1. OqA '8J3SBl(IA .iie jndiUBy 3gB{(i^\ ^B ja^jo^ -ioi}i^3d sqi jo 3SBO sqj, auud sqi jo UOI}B(OIA ui psss'ed us AUE 3uponpuoo ^ SuuBsq )OS'6'SS 'J'S'A". Bqjoy piflsiQ aEjSs^ui 'jsoyjo p3fojcj-|7'o|st 'i^psd avft ^vvft si uoppsci siqi jndurey ^B J35[JOAY ipequ'eSv 1 pasfEJ 30U13A3U3 3L(J, •uoiinsd peunoo psujBsi pj-esH assq Ap'E3J(B eeq ujnpy ) '®qBAwqqoi35{'g'V uqs iMsrep 'r'a's uqs P-IBSH. SOOZ'A't' li;^lrt»PSJrt'>telu->a [»A)ttolsh \t\ OOZ ]feH <.,,/,. .^.^. .,^,. . i.^..... t1»!htl5 IPHh rt'b-^-lo/u^rvi — >K»lrtls) 'S>l^ftyl« 'bWlh.lh- lap ifclhilslfcblK-lteP <fell.bj I* li;yK> 8/.-3H-IX XI-HC-78 STI^T^Tf^TW ;rar 3ii^T s»)*i <"• <fe< ^'^^ 3^'^1PI7?W, ^Tnu'IS, Rlcll+iy © *1MMI Sh*licb ^200 341^111^* ('iclid°"<.'sr) ?^nwfff?(T3n^T T.9" saiTie Having heard learned record, On 27.5,1996 the Welfare, State of M.P. issui| conditions of the appointmen) (Annexure R-l) and the Chhattisgarh, As per the SE prescribed for removal of the A| contemplates that on receivinj Worker/Sahayika, the Gram send the same to the Super|i receiving complaint, the within a period of 15 days Supervisor will forward his r4 along with the resolution of G^, that after receiving the paperj Janpad Panchayat shall pa^ envisages that if any serious aRainst the Aganbadi Gram Panchayat for voting ancf the recommendation shal! be s[ If we look into the imp( petitioner were terminated, no| in the return filed by the resix>| said procedure has been adij) termination was i^assed on ccjunsel for the parties, I have perused the erstwhile Sup^rvisor tii<il<i41-< iw<tTffto<ft'<Ri«i< ^3lf^T3T1^T Depai-tment of Women & Child fcd the notification regarding terms & t and removal of the Aaganbadi Worker has been adopted by the State of |id notification, the procedure has been jaganbadi Worker. Clause (1) ofthesame serious compliant against any Aaganbadi [Panchayat after passing the resolution t'isor. Clause (2) contemplates that on shall enquire into the complaint |nd thereafter if it is found con-ect, the ;ommendation to the Janpad Panchayat 1-am Panchayat, Clause (3) contemplates from the Supei-visor within a week the |s the order for removal, Clause (4) Workei)/Sahayifc ;omplaint is received by the Supervisor 1/Sahayika, he shall place it before the after the consent of the Gram Panchayat ^nt to the Janpad Panchayat for removal, ugned order whereby the sei'vices of the such procedurc has been adopted. Even ndents it'has not been mentioned that the >pted, it simply says that the order of the instruction of the Collector dated l^-%8\t^(. XI-HC-78 s^^iraRra-, ®Tf1u'i<s,Ridiyy *ll*ini sb*<|cb ^ 200 3ll^<?l iwi (llcl(^lst<i!iT) 3ti^T?>rR-fi* TOT311$!jl*l<i+ ''< ,^-'^ ":'/^ '} ^p' waRKHfsg'sn^T -3 30,12.2003, The services ofth was found selling Daliya illegall; As the ARanbadi service; the constitution of Panchayats of India, therefore, their constiti Constitution of India and Artii relate to functioninR and consti' being a creation of the Coni benefits ofArticle 311 (2) of t| termination of services, withou) in law and liable to be quashed, In the present ca.se, s^ opportunity to show cause agal any enquiry the services of the| the principles of natural justice] petitioner to face the enquiiy her, Therefore, in the present under the Government notifical hereby quashed, However, it not be precluded from cond) appropriate orders in accordan4 Consequently, M,(W,)P, 1545/06 also stand disposed oi|, Certified copy as per rulet q>l<<I<l41-1 HIHCTTtftel^l'<Rl^il< ^•sri^irsn^r petitioner has been terminated, as she in the village, are under the Janpad Panchayat and ;omes within Part-IX of the Constitution [ition is governed undei-Article 243 ofthe l-1e 243-A to 243(0) of the Constitution tution of Panchayats, Janpad Panchayat Ititution, its employees are entitled to [le Constitution, therefore, any order of affording opportunity of hearing is bad ren the petitioner was not given any nst her misconduct and wi'thouf holdint petitioner has been terminated violatinj i.e. without giving any opportunity to the .nd reply the al'egations levelled against ;ase neither the procedure, as envisaged ;ion nor the principles of natural justice havebeen followed before passi|"ig the impugned order, In the result, the impugrjed order is liable to be quashed and it is i made clear that the respondents shall .icting the enquiry and passing the with the rule, N0,2345/05 and I.A.No, 5593/05 & Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge r^--%2\,^^