IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15696 of 2009 BRAJESH KUMAR @ RAHUL RAJ, Son of Upendra Narayan Singh, resident of village:-Urshary Shikarpur, P.S.-Danapur, District-Patna. ……..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………. Opp. Party. ----------- 3/ 21.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The case is under Sections 363, 366 (A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, it is said that, cognizance has been taken in this case under Sections 368, 354 and 34 of the IPC. The allegation is that the petitioner and another accused enticed away the minor grand daughter of the informant, may be, for the purposes of marriage. It is submitted that some statement has come during the investigation that the victim girl was in love with the petitioner. From the statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C., it appears that the petitioner and others had taken advantage of acquaintance with the girl and took her along with them and she was raped and subsequently she was also black-mailed by them under threat that she will be lifted and she was called and act of rape was again repeated on her. Considering the categorical statement of the girl under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. with regard to black-mail and repeated rape by the petitioner and others, this Court is not inclined to allow this application for grant of bail. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Let the trial of the case be expedited and effort should be made to conclude the same within one year. Sanjeet/ (J. N. Singh, J.)