IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 897 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 493 OF 2004 ICICI BANK LTD.,MUMBAI 400 050. ....Applicant Versus R.R.RAJ,CHENNAI AND ORS., ....Respondents Mr. V. Trivedi with Mr. S.M. Singbal, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. E.O. Mendes, Advocate fo the respondent No.1. Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for the respondent No.2. Mr. J. A. Lobo, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 6th October, 2005 P.C. After having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-ICICI Bank Ltd., I am satisfied that the order dated 4.11.2004 does not call for vacation/modification at the instance of the present applicant. It is always open to the applicant to adopt independent proceedings for redressal of its grievance. The miscellaneous civil application is, accordingly, disposed of. Taking into consideration the subject-matter in the writ petition, I am satisfied that the writ petition deserves to be heard at an early date. The Office is directed to post the writ petition for final hearing in the second week of January, 2006. R. M. LODHA, J. ssm.