1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4009 OF 2009 Mohd. Abdul Kadar s/o Sk Amir Kadri - PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Ors. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.SV Jadhav-Patil,Advocate for Petitioner; Mrs.RK Laddha, AGP for Resp.No.2. Mr.Bhushan Kulkarni, Adv. for Resp.Nos.1 & 3. ----- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 20th November, 2009. PER COURT : . Heard. 2) We have perused the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.605/1994. The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the Collector dated 19.4.1994 is under challenge. We are not absolutely satisfied with the explanation tendered by the counsel as to why the petitioner is approaching after near about 15 2 years. There is no proper explanation in the petition for this inordinate delay. There is abnormal delay and laches on the part of the petitioner to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. We are not inclined to exercise extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court in the facts of the case. In the result, the petition stands dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) (NARESH H. PATIL) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/wp4009.09