IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-197 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 18, 2011 Sarfraz Khan Deol. …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file proper petition challenging the order dated 24.07.2010 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala, taking cognizance and summoning the accused in case FIR No. 538 dated 14.11.2008, under Sections 307, 326, 324, 341, 506, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station, Sadar Patiala. The only apprehension of the learned CRM M-197 of 2011 counsel for the petitioner is that in the event of challenging the order dated 24.07.2010 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, taking cognizance and summoning the accused, the order rejecting the anticipatory bail will come into the way of the petitioner. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the summoning order dated 24.07.2010. It goes without saying that in the event of challenging the summoning order, rejection of the anticipatory bail, shall not affect adversely the right of the petitioner. January 18, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2