IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.798 of 2009 1. Bhagirathi Singh 2. Shyamrathi Singh 3. Rajbali Singh 4. Ramayan Singh, sl. No. 1 to 4 are sons of late Haricharan Singh 5. Jokhu Singh 6. Balister Singh, sl. No. 5 and 6 are sons of Bhagrirathi Singh 7. Sukhraj Singh 8. Ramesh Singh 9. Arbind Singh, sl.no.7 to 9 are sons of Shyamrathi Singh 10. Parsuram Singh 11. Nandu Singh, sl.no.10 to 11 are sons of Rajgrihi Singh 12. Santosh Singh, son of Rajbali Singh 13. Sanjay Singh 14. Dinanath Singh 15. Nikku Singh, sl.no.13 to 15 are sons of Ramayan Singh, all residents of Village & Post-Amaon, P.S. Karamchat, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua) ---- Defendants Ist Set ----- Petitioners. Versus 1. Ram Charitar Singh@Charitar Singh, son of Ramswaroop Singh 2. Nirmal Singh alias Nirmal Kumar Singh, son of Ram Charitar Singh alias Charitar Singh 3. Ajit Kumar Singh 4. Anil Kumar Singh, sl nos. 3 and 4 are sons of Nirmal Singh, all are residents of Village & Post Amaon, P.S. Karamchat, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua) ---- Plaintiffs ---- Opposite Parties Ist Set. 5. Murahi alias Munna Kuwar, widow of late Shio Prasad Singh, resident of Village & Post Amaon, P.S. Karamchat, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua) 6. Jai Kalo Devi wife of Tejpati Singh, resident of Village- Ekoni, P.O. Obar, P.S. Sonhan, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua) 7. Kapil Singh, son of late Shio Prasad Singh 8. Hari Narain Singh, son of Kalicharan Singh 9. Pritam Singh, son of Kapil Singh 10. Gautam Singh 11. Uttam Singh 12. Child not named, sl no.10 to 12 are minor sons of Kapil 2 Singh, through and under the guardianship of their father and natural guardian Kapil Singh 13. Child not named 14. Child not named, sl. no. 13 and 14 are minor sons of Hari Narain Singh, through and under the guardianship of their father and natural guardian namely Hari Narain Singh, sl.no.7 to 14 are residents of Village & Post-Amaon, P.S. Karamchat, District- Kaimur(Bhabhua) --- Defendants 2nd Set --- Opposite Parties 2nd Set. ---------------------------------- 3. 28.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Defendants of Title Suit No.83 of 2003 has preferred this civil revision application under the provisions of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and are aggrieved by the order dated 1.4.2009, whereby their application has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision application. It is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.)