W mun .. .. “.."U.é 9’ . .§ Presentlet; l;y haw “MSCJAa-‘k A m W 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N§f16a€ /2006 PETITIONER Ramphal Sahu, S/o. Shrii Sant Ram Sahu, age 50 years, R/o. Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, P.S. Sirli, Block — Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, / through Secretary; School Education Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Commissioner, Adim jati r” Tatha-Anusuchit Jati Development Department, Y, n 4. Jeevan Lal ’ Kashyap S/o. , Not known, Age 55 years: R/o. Primary School Baira, P.S. Podi Uproda, Korba (C.G.). RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W Raipur (C.G.). 3. District Collector, Korba / ’ (C.G.). (the digit) XI—HC-22 WW,m,W 311%91'W mmw‘pN&$qé—g 2006 / \g W ............................. mam mm WWEWW WT 3W“ “F“ aamm W§TIW . ‘ 08-08-2006 Shri Rahul Jha, counsel for the petitioney. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy.Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents g No.1 to 3, on adVance copy. Heard. By the instant writ petition Ander Article 226/227 of the Constitution of india, the petitioner has challenged his transfer order dated 06.07.2006 (Annexure-P/i) passed by respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Primary SchooL Sirki, Paii to Primary School, Baira, Podi Uproda. i Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the impugned transfer order is not executabie, s the petitioner has been shown to be transferred from Primary Schooi, riki, whereas the petitioner is working in Primary School, Sirii. ln the ci cumstances, learned counsel further submits that the petitioner may b atlowed to make a representation to t respondent No.1 and respondent, o."l be directed to decide the same to \L which learned counsel appearingf r the State/ respondents No.1 to 3 has no objection. Having heard learned coun el for the parties, having regard to the . facts and circumstances. of the ca e ahd‘Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case; the pray r made by learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be just, fair an reasonable. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to make a representati n to respondent No.1 raising ali his grievances annexing a copy of the instant writ petition within a period of ten days from today and in turn, res ondent No.1 is directed to decide the same within a period of one month-f om the date of its receipt, considering XI-HC-22 mw,m, WW WW aw . WpA/03g5g% 2006 /, ML}: VFsa' m m m w WW§WW égwm Soma- ail the grievances raised by thi accordance with law. With the aforesaid directior Consequentiy, M.(W.). P. aiso stand disposed of. i, the writ petition stands disposed of. No.3084/2006 and LA. No.748412006 Parties are entitied for cert ified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 0% W) a petitioner in an objective manner, in m