1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.234 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.234 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.234 OF 2008 Manoj Bansilal Parakh ... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. J.D. Khairnar for Applicant. Mr. Pritesh Bohade for respondent No.2 Mr. P.P. Shinde APP for respondent no. 1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J : V.C. DAGA, J : V.C. DAGA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2008 : 25TH JUNE, 2008 : 25TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. Parties have filed Consent Terms duly signed by them and their respective Advocates. Both of them jointly prayed for compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in terms of Consent Terms. The offence committed by the applicant stands compounded. The applicant is entitled to withdraw the application. Both Revision and application stand disposed of. 2 ( V.C. DAGA, J.) V.C. DAGA, J.) V.C. DAGA, J.)