Crl. Misc. No.M-13519 of 2008(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-13519 of 2008(O&M) Decided on : 16-09-2009 Gurmeet Kaur ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab. MAHESH GROVER, J This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for quashing of complaint titled as 'Surjit Kaur versus Gurmeet Kaur' and all consequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the complaint is frivolous as in the body thereof it has been stated that the incident took place on 18.12.2005 whereas the witnesses who were examined by the complainant stated that the incident took place on 10.12.2005 and therefore, the Court ought not have summoned the petitioner because of this material contradiction. He further states that the complaint is absolutely false. No one has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.2, even though service has been duly effected upon her. Initially Mr.Narender Dadwal, Advocate appeared on her behalf but thereafter he defaulted. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that in the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the Crl. Misc. No.M-13519 of 2008(O&M) 2 Court cannot appreciate the veracity of the statements recorded before the learned Trial Court. Hence, dismissed. The petitioner, if so advised, may take up all the pleas available to him at an appropriate stage before the learned Trial Court. September 16 , 2009 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge