AB 2656/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEP.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr . B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P. Assam who has produced the C.D. with entries up to 10.08.2011in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 767/2011 (GR Case No. 15 64/11) u/s. 420/406/506/34 IPC. The I.O. has already recorded statement of some witnesses from which it appears that the accused petitioner being fair price sho p owner used to keep ration card of the customers in his possession and made so me manipulation in the records of sale of fair price items. The investigation is in progress. The FIR was lodged by one of the general consu mers of the area. There is no other complaint from other consumers. There is no screening in the business activities of the accused petitioner, particularly in respect of the fair price items. It appears that the petitioner’s father and hi s uncle had been running the said business since 1975 and after the death of hi s father and uncle, he has been running the said business. No such allegation or complaint has been made earlier against the accused petitioner. In view of the above, the earlier interim bail order dated 29.08.2011 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. However, an additional condition is i mposed on the petitioner directing him to be present along with relevant records / documents before the I.O. at least once in a week for a period of 3 (three) m onths from today. The bail application is disposed of.