IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2007 / 7TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 132 of 2001() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.11104/2000 .................... APPELLANT: ----------- 1. P.M.KUNHILAKSHMY, THACHAMPALAM HOUSE, PANNIYANKARA, CALICUT. 2. V.K.SANKARAN, VIKAS – PANAYI, P.O. KOKKULLUR, VIA. BALUSSERRY 673 612. 3. P.LAKSHMI, W/O P.K.SREENIVASAN, “SREE LAKSHMI”, NEAR KODILTHODE, P.O. KOTTOLY, CALICUT. BY ADV. SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BYDYUDHI BHAVANAM, TRIVANDRUM. 2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, POWER DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN SMT.G.KRISHNAKUMARI SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SC, KSEB SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ ------------------- W.A.132/2001 -------------------- Dated this the 28th day of June, 2007 JUDGMENT K.S.Radhakrishnan, J. This writ appeal arises out of the Judgment in O.P.No.11104/2000. Original Petition was preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to grant 3rd Grade Promotion in the scale of Rs.3375-5035 to the first petitioner with effect from 23.5.1998, to the second petitioner from 11.8.1997 and to the third petitioner from 2.7.1997. Direction was also sought for to the first respondent to issue orders granting them 3rd Higher Grade from the promotion post. 2. We are of the view, if the petitioners have any grievances, those grievances should be first considered by the concerned authorities. Petitioners, it is submitted, have already submitted Exts. P1 and P2 representations before the first respondent, let the first respondent dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period W.A.132/2001 2 of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment 3. Appellants, if so advised, may make fresh representations also. This appeal is disposed of as above. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs