C.R. No.3217 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Caveat Petition No.______ of 2010 C.R. No.3217 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.8.2010 Ramesh Kumar and others ……Petitioners VERSUS Satbir Singh and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate for the caveator. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) C.R. No.3217 of 2010 -2- 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition, however, states that learned trial Court be di- rected to expedite the suit proceeding. 2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Learned trial Court is requested to decide the suit itself in accordance with law at the earli- est without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. It is also observed that any observation made in the im- pugned judgments passed by both of Courts below shall not come into the way of the learned trial Court while deciding the suit on merit. ( ALOK SINGH ) 19th August, 2010 JUDGE ashish