1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.35 OF 2008 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.4 OF 2006 IN PROBATE PETITION NO.887 OF 2005 Mrs.Mehar Amersey & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Zinia Lawyer & Anr. ...Defendants. And HDFC Bank Ltd. ...Respondent. .... Mr. Prashant Kulkarni i/b. M/s. Zohair & Co for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Tasneem Sarin i/b. S.K. Srivastava for Defendant No.1. Ms.Deepti Ghandy i/b. AZB & Partners for Defendant No.2. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. March 17, 2008. P.C.: Consent Minutes of the Order signed respectively by the Advocate for the Plaintiffs, the Advocate for Defendant No.1 and the Advocate for Defendant No.2 are taken on record and marked “X”. Learned Counsel for the aforesaid parties state that there is no other 2 party with a conflicting claim before the Court. On this statement before the Court, there is no reason why an order in terms of the Consent Minutes of the Order should not be passed. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs states that a notice has already been furnished to the HDFC Bank. There shall be an order accordingly. ....