IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20533 of 2008 UDAY SHANKAR @ UDAI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 3. 21.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No.193 of 2007 for the alleged offences registered under sections 406, 417, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the husband of complainant obtained the loan from the Bank and purchased the tractor from the agency of this petitioner in the year 2005 and after retaining the tractor for about two years the loanee came and part his tractor before the shop of the agency on being noticed by the Bank twice for refund of the loan instalment. The allegation of the complainant is to the effect that the tractor implements were not given and as such she is returning his tractor to avoid repayment of loan. Learned APP appearing on behalf of 2 the State although opposes the prayer for bail, but is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and the materials brought on the record, it is directed that petitioner Uday Shankar @ Udai Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No.193 of 2007 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)