1 17-cac-350-2011.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srj CIVIL APPLICATION NO.350 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.130 OF 2007 Shri Bhalchandra B. Kamire .. Applicant. V/s. Dr. Shantikumar D. Chivate .. Respondent. None for the Applicant. Mr. C. S. Patil, for the Respondent. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.: 1 None present for the Applicant. 2 Mr. C. S. Patil appearing for the Respondent opposed the Civil Application on the ground that a separate Application for condonation of delay in filing Civil Application for restoration is not filed and also on the ground that reasons for delay are not proper. 3 I have carefully considered the submission. On 10th February, 2 17-cac-350-2011.sxw 2011, neither the Applicant nor the Respondent in the Civil Revision Application were represented, as both Advocates were absent. The reasons for delay have been duly explained in paragraphs 2 to 5 of the Civil Application which is verified by the Advocate for the Applicant. Prayer for delay is made and, therefore, there is no need to file separate application. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 4 The Civil Revision Application is restored to file and will be placed for final hearing in due course. (G.S.GODBOLE, J.)