THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1379 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the docket order, dated 03.02.2010, passed by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, dismissing the application I.A.No.275 of 2008 in O.S.No.600 of 2006, filed under Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to send the signatures of defendant on Ex.A-1 and other signatures of defendant available on different documents to Handwriting expert for comparison and give his opinion. 3. Petitioners are the plaintiffs and respondent is the defendant in the suit. 4. Normally, the opinion of the Handwriting expert is not conclusive. The said opinion is always rebuttable, and if the Court or the other side has any objection, it can always subject the expert to cross-examination. Further, the Court can also arrive at a different conclusion than the one expressed by the expert based on the evidence on record, on merits. 5. The Court below passed the impugned order totally exercising its discretionary jurisdiction. This Court is not inclined to interfere with such an order unless and until a very strong case is made out. But, in the present case, I do not find any such strong circumstance calling for interference by this Court. 6. For the aforesaid reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA​ 9th April 2010 dr