: 1 : wp-1745-11=.doc USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1745 OF 2011 Mutib Abdul Rauf Nachan .. Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ......... Ms. Tahera Qureshi for the petitioner Mr. V.B. Kondedeshmukh, APP for respondent State ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 11th JULY, 2011. P.C. : 1. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that after the filing of the chargesheet the petitioner had filed an application for discharge and the same came to be rejected. If this is the position and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has to file appropriate proceedings challenging the order by which application for discharge was rejected. That has not been done in this petition. 2. On hearing this, learned Counsel for the petitioner applied for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file appropriate : 2 : wp-1745-11=.doc proceedings so as to challenge the order by which revision for discharge has been rejected. 3. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Liberty as prayed for is granted. 4. No views are expressed on the merits of the matter. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)