IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933 RP.No. 277 of 2011() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32766/2010 Dated 07/02/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ------------------------------------ 1. DR.N.RAJARAM, PROFESSOR IN FORENSIC MEDICINE, PSG INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, COIMBATORE. 2. DR.C.KARTHIKEYAN, PROFESSOR IN SURGERY, SUT MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DR.K.RAVINDRAN, PROFESSOR IN SURGERY, SOMERWELL MEMORIAL MEDICAL COLLEGE, KARAKKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DR.U.NANDAKUMARAN NAIR, PROFESSOR IN PHYSICAL MEDICINE, ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY, CHIDAMBARAM, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR SRI.G.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, POCKET-14, SECTOR-8, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI-110 077. 3. TRAVNCORE-COCHIN COUNCIL FOR MODER MEDICINE REP.BY ITS RGISTRAR, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P. NARAYANAN R2 BY ADV.SRI. ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC FOR MCI R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ, SC, TCMC & KNMC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/04/2011,ALONG WITH RP NO.282 OF 2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------------------- R.P.Nos.277/2011 in WP(c).NO.32766/2010 & 282/2011 in WP(c).No.31624/2010. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011 O R D E R Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the respective counsel for the respondents. 2. Although I have heard the counsel at length, I am of the view that the order date 7th February, 2011, review of which is sought in these Review Petitions, is not vitiated for any error apparent on the face of it, warranting its review. Therefore review petitions are dismissed. However, it is clarified that it will be open to the petitioners to submit their applications for the issuance of certificate with security features. If applications are submitted within 10 days from today, the 3rd respondent in the Review Petitions will entertain the applications and consider the same in accordance with law for the issuance of certificates with security feathers. It is also clarified that submission of the applications in pursuance to the order dated 7th February, 2011 shall be without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioners in the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :