1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4807 OF 2010 (Ms. Sangita d/o Ravindranath Chakravarty vs. Nagpur Housing and Area Development Board and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 31, 2011 Heard Shri Anjan De, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Verma, learned Counsel for the respondent no1, Shri Kasat, learned Counsel for the respondent no.2, and Shri Bhongade, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3. In the petition, the issue pertains to unauthorised construction alleged to have been made by the respondent no.3. Shri Verma, learned Counsel for the respondent no.1, states that requisite action under the provisions of the Maharashtra Housing and Area 2 Development Act has already been initiated against the respondent no.3 and decision in the matter shall be taken according to law and procedure applicable in this regard. In view of the above statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent no.1, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj