CWP No. 4448 of 2010 27.04.2011 Present: Mr. Harmeet Singh and Mr. Vineet Vashishta, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. with Mr. J. S. Guleria, Astt. A.G. for respondents No. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondents No. 8 to 14. From the impugned order dated 10.5.2010 (Annexure P-7) it is quite apparent that the decision is based on the findings of the Sub Divisional Enquiry Committee/Sub Divisional Magistrate which considered the petitioner’s merit on the basis of the guidelines issued subsequent to the selection of the petitioner. The selection took place in a meeting held by the P.T.A. on 23.8.2007 whereas the criteria laid down by the Government, as relied upon and applied by the appropriate authority is laid down in the notification dated 27.5.2008. Thus the action of the respondent is clearly illegal. 2. Consequently on this short ground alone, Annexure P-7 is quashed with a direction to respondent No. 5 to consider the petitioner’s case afresh and take decision, in accordance with law, after issuing notice to all concerned. Needful be positively done within a period of two months from today. 3. Petitioner submits that there is vacancy lying in Middle School, Bhamot. It is open for her to bring this fact to the notice of the concerned authority who may consider accommodating her their, in accordance with law. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. April 27, 2011 (PK)