;•,'.v'^^yiiS;^-9^^^^3^ .; ?•? G^ [efo ^ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0 ^{5'12006 •^ PETITIONER^ .-•.?• .^r 'rwy ^p' .; <?-< /•i.'° ^7; ^' y yf' /' ^ Ku. Savita Soni D/oShri RamadharSoni Age about 35 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Pangari, Biock- ^^y-r'^ . WK. jChowki, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUT10N OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- RESPONDENTS ^/ HI6H CGURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASRJR SIN6LE BENCH ; HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRL J. Petitioner WRrr pEnnoN (S.) N0.7125 OF 2006 Ku. Savita Soni versus Respondents State 6ovt. of Chhattisgorh and onotiier Petitioner WRIT PETTTION t5.) N0.7126 OF 2006 5mt. Janak Nandini Siarnna versus HTS The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner WRFT PFTmON (S.) N0.7127 OF 2006 Prafflod Kumar Parakh versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner WRTT PETmON fS.) N0 7143 OF 2006 Ku. Rito. Pondey (Now-Smt. Ritn Mishru versus State 6ovt. of OihattiS9erh and others Present : Mr. Ajay Shrivas-tava, counsel for the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jo.in, Ponel lawyer for the S+nte/ respcincfents. ORDER (Pas^d on •tdis 21st day of December, 2006) 1, Learned counsel cppearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts ond question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court- in the cuse of Yashwairi' Kumw Bha/w^wej vs. Mtinseipel Capwatien, Qwy and anethe^' . 2. For the aforementioned reasons, -the writ petitions are dispo^d of in terms of +he decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant .Kumar Bharadwcy {'Supraj, subject to verificcition of the fact ns to u^iether the petitioners haye acquired B. Ed. Ceri-ificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and l-3-1999 and further whether they haye been pcid two o^yance increments or not. No orcter as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on the record of the connec*« it oetitions. Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judge ! 2006CtI)MP3'R-C69& Bablu