^•' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (Sl No. 7274 of 2007 PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS 3. Mindro Ram Yadav, S/o Shri Daitari Ram Yadav, aged 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government Higher Secondary Schoot, Kapu, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus StateofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND!A Appearance: Shrl Anii Mourya, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panei Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (10.12.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. He submite that the issue invoh/ed herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and others), wherein, it was held that the similariy situated teachere are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding Uie decision of the Tribunal to the effect that Ifte Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scate from the ^date of initial appointment. Shyna W.P.(S)No.7274/2007 Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and ottiers Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kuniar Sahu and another (supra). in view of that, this petition is aliowed in the same terms. However, this order shal! be subject to ail verifieations made by the State regarding facts pteaded in the petition. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge •^- '.'-^:~?.1.=3—