IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.114 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.114 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.114 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.100 OF 2004 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.905 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO.900 OF 2002 Jayesh Jayantilal Doshi .. Appellant V/s Smt.Hemlata Heramb Naik & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Piyush Shah for the Appellant. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 3rd August, 2006. DATE : 3rd August, 2006. DATE : 3rd August, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of two weeks from today. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay caused in filing the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)