IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3909 of 2011 VIJAY BISWAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, informant has not seen the actual killing of the deceased and it is only stated by him that he had seen the petitioner and several other accused persons fleeing from the place of occurrence at the time of alleged occurrence. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner’s sister has filed maintenance case against the nephew of the informant and that is the reason the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Vijay Biswas be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Muffasil Motihari P.S. Case No.188 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)