IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8899 of 2010 RAKENDRA CHOUDHARY & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 16-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. All the three petitioners have prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 302,201/34 of the IPC. It has been shown that as per statement of mother of the deceased who was a boy aged about 12 years, she informed the police that the boy died of pain in the stomach and the Gotias cremated him because father was not available at that time. It appears that subsequently after three days the father of the deceased boy has expressed suspicion against the petitioners who are Gotias that they may be having hand in the murder of the boy whose dead body was found somewhere else and that he had not died in the house. According to the FIR the accused persons manipulated and pressurized the informant’s wife to give the earlier statements. Considering all the facts and circumstances, the prayer of anticipatory bail is allowed to the extent that till the 2 investigation is completed, petitioners, namely, 1) Rakendra Choudhary, 2) Girijanand Singh @ Girijanand Choudhary and 3) Koushal Choudhary shall be allowed anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Dhangai P.S. Case No.77/08 but within the period of six weeks from today. It is made clear that such bail shall be operative only for the period of investigation and if after investigation police finds that the petitioners are involved in the offence and submits charge-sheet then the petitioners will be required to surrender and seek bail on merits. The anticipatory bail shall be subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)