IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5191 of 2008 Between: Goli Venkateswarlu S/o.Ramanaiah R/o.Main Bazar Atmakur(V) Nellore Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police Nellore,Nellore Dist 2 The Divisional Surperintendent of Police Atmakur,Nellore Dist 3 The Sub-Inspector Atmakur Nellore Dist 4 Kanchi Chandra Reddy S/o.Not know to Petitioner Major R/o.Kandiveedhi Atmakur Nellore Dist 5 K.Hazarnath Reddy S/o.not know to petitioner Major R/o.Kandiveedhi Atmakur,Nellore Dist 6 Challa Mallikarjuna S/o.Ramakrishnaiah Major Brahamma Veedhi Atmakur, Nellore Dist .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.TUHIN KUMAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not investigating in pursuance of the directions given by respondent No.1 on complaints, dated 02.07.2007 and 14.12.2007 of the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, who read the complaints filed by the petitioner, invited my attention to the same and stated that their contents do not indicate commission of any cognizable offences by respondent Nos.4 to 6. She has also furnished a copy of printed material in the name of the petitioner and submitted that the contents of the said material show that the petitioner is mentally unstable. Sri G.Tuhin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that in pursuance of the complaints made by the petitioner, some of the police personnel went to the petitioner’s house and started investigation into the complaints. In view of the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of, without going into the issue whether the complaints of the petitioner make out any cognizable offence or not. If during the investigation, which is allegedly commenced, the police find that any cognizable offence is committed, they shall register the crime. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.6735 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 25th MARCH, 2008 kvni