C^ t^^- ;LE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C. G.l W. P^ISl N0. ^/Cf OF 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Ritu Surange W/o Shri Uday Surange, aged about 49 years, Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Mova, Raipur, R/o F-10, Shriram Nagar, Phase - 1, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ A.-^ \r •1<" f. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, S ch o ol Education Departnient, Mantralay, DauKalyanSingh Bhawan District - Raipur (C.G.) ^- 2. The Additional Secretary, S ch o ol Education Departinent, Raipur (C G) ^" 3. The District Education Officer, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) ^- 4. The Block Education Officer, Dharsiva, District " Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5. Mahesh Nayak, Assistant Dii-ector (Original Post <?— Prin cip al), Public Education Directorate, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTlON OF INDIA ^ *11*ICTI (bw^ ^^ '^i^i(nA<, yTi1<i<i<o, fsi<ni-Mlj,< ^j.(:2:..a>x^.^<, 3T1^T 1(^W ( ytsq<^) Sil^T^T f<^Jcb WT 3?TI^?T^qw '^TTW^f^l^I?^ SB : HON(BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITIlSKBR DIWAKBR 25.10.2010 -'^ ShriOharmeBhShrivastava, c| Shri Vivek Shamia, P.L. for th| Challenge in the present 11.10.2010 (Annexure P/l) passedj petitioner has been attached to the <j district Raipur from Goveniment district Raipur. Contention on behalf of the place of posting, she has recentlyjoi! seven months, she has been shift^l. It has been contended by the counsel for the petitioner that the at|:achment is not permissible under the law and therefore the order impu! counsel that on 19.3,2010 the petit| Principal a.nd thereafter she gave hexj order impugned has been passed a| District Education Officer, Raipur. Counsel for the petitioner sul^ served, if a.t this stage, he may be rj with liberty to make appropriate re|>resentation before the resp. No. 1 and in turn ttie resp. N0.1 be accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioner is |)ermitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representatio^ within a period of one week from jier and in turn it is expected from In accordance with law within a the date of receipt of copy of this or the resp. No.l to decide the same <^i<4t<n<A<i 'RI^f ^? f^^ <f^^i< i73tftTR37?^T 3unsel fo the petitioner. ; State/re.8ps. 1 to 4. 3.etition is to the order dated .by the resp. No.2 by which the )ffice of District Education Officer^ -iigher Secondary School, Mowa, petitioner is that on her present hied on 26.3.2010 and in less than ^ned is bad. Supporting the order impugn4<l it has been argued by the State |oner was prom.oted to the post of Joining on 26.3.2010 and now the ^king her to work in the ofTice of |mit.s that ends ofjustice would be [ermitted fco withdraw this petition kiirected to decide the same in Turther period otone7n5TTRTT sd/- pritinkerDWaker judge