[1] FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE District: WRIT PETITION NOS.6037, 6074 AND WRIT PETITION NOS.6037, 6074 AND WRIT PETITION NOS.6037, 6074 AND 6075 OF 2006 6075 OF 2006 6075 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ¦ of Coram, Court’s order or ¦ Court’s or Judge’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders directions and Registrar’s ¦ orders ¦ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Kiran Bapat with Ms A. Kalalogi and T.S. Ingale for the Petitioners in all the petitions. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: OCTOBER 11, 2006 :: ORDER :: :: ORDER :: :: ORDER :: For the reasons stated above, therefore, while making it clear that merely for completion of the proceedings under Section 48(6) or (7) of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, the presence of the person/s against whom the contempt proceedings are sought to be initiated cannot be insisted upon unless the Court specifically requires such person/s to assist the Court to complete the report to be submitted to the High Court, the application for transfer is rejected. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/1011wpg6037.6 sjs/1011wpg6037.6 sjs/1011wpg6037.6