S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 7431 of 2009 Roop Singh & Anr. vs. State of Raj. ---- 30.9.2009 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Raghunandan Sharma for the petitioners. Mr. G.S.Faujdar, Public Prosecutor. --- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned counsel for the accused petitioners does not press the bail application of accused petitioner Vikram Singh. The bail application of accused petitioner Vikram Singh is dismissed as withdrawn. However the accused petitioner Vikram Singh is free to move bail application before the trial court after filing of the challan. So far as bail application of accused petitioner Roop Singh is concerned, the learned counsel contended that the grievous injury has not been inflicted by him on the injured and he has been simply named in the FIR. There is no specific role assigned to him in the FIR. The accused petitioner is in judicial lock up for the last two months. The trial will take time. The Public Prosecutor opposed this argument. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the accused petitioner Roop Singh son of Samundra Singh shall be released on bail provided he shall submit bail bond in the amount of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 12,500/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before the trial court on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/