IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7644 of 2009 SUSHIL KUMAR son of Sahadeo Thakur, resident of village- Raipur, P.S.- Nanpur, District Sitamarhi. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 414, 379, 467, 468, 469, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioner was found with the stolen vehicle which was being taken for its sale and on being asked no paper could be produced and some other incriminating articles were also recovered from the vehicle in question as per the seizure list. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner who was found present in the vehicle which was being taken to Nepal for its sale. Considering the nature of allegations levelled against this petitioner, I am not inclined to allow this application. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) Manish/-