: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.503 OF 1998 Chandrakant Ganpati Patil ... Appellant V/s. Ganpati Tukaram Patil & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.M. Kamble with Mr.M.J. Chaturvedi for Appellant Mr.Y.A. Sakhare i/b J.K. Patil for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: APRIL 1, 2010 P.C.: 1. The second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the appellate Court dated 10.1.1994. By this judgment, the appellate Court has confirmed the finding of the trial Court that the plaintiffs are not entitled to any declaratory relief with respect to the suit property. However, the appellate Court has injuncted the appellants from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs over the land which was in their possession on the date of filing of the suit. 2. In my view, there is no substantial question of law which arises in the present appeal. If the appellant is aggrieved by any encroachment by the plaintiffs on his land, it is for him to file an independent suit in respect of the that matter. 3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.