c.r.\o° t,, i- cl*irtnl?a £U> "s/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitionNo. 100:;7/2005 PETITIONER Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Korba West, through Chief Engineer, Korba (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENT& ^ -cP, ^^(^^: ^' 'b^-p!^ ^^^v '^ ^8^n < 1. Industa-ial Court, Raipur (CG). I ^ 2. Liabour Court, Bilaspur (CG). 3. Durga Prasad Sao s/o Phoolchand, Ex-Office Assistant Grade-III, r/o New Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUJi WRIT PETITION No. 1427 of2006 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Diirga Prasad Sao. VERSUS ClAattisgarh State Electricity Board & Others. Present: Sliri S.P.Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Aiiumeh Slirivastava, Advocate appearuig on behalfof Shri --\bhishek Siiiha, Advocate for the respondent NTo. 1. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRrrPETITION N®.1005 of 2005 Chhattisgarh State Eleetricity Board. VERSUS Industrial Court, Raipitf & Others. Presieiit: Shri Anumeh Slirivastava, Advocate appearmg on behalfof Shri Abhishek Sinlia, Advocate for tlie pelhioner, Shri S.P.Kale, Advocate fbrthe respondent No. 3. WRIT PETmON LWDER .-^TICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTLTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shi-i Satish K. Aanilwtri, J. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 07th day of Noveniber, 2009) 1.. Lsamed counsel appearuig for the panies subniit that since the employee i.e. peiitioner in W.P. No. 1427 of 2006, and respondent No. 3 iii W.P. No. ' 1005 of 2005, has died during the pendeiicy of these petitions, nothing remains for adjudication in these matters and the petitions have become infructuous. In vievv ofthe submissions made by leanied counsel for the parties, both the petitions are dismissed as having become infi'uctuous. No order asto costs, Ui Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge