IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14230 of 2008 Vidyanand Prasad, son of Sri Kailash Mahto, resident of village-Rampur Bagnabad, Ward No. 29, P.S.Biharsharif, District-Nalanda. ………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through District Magistrate, Biharsharif, District-Nalanda 2. The Administrative Officer, Nagar Parishad, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda 3. The Municipality Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, BIharsharif, Nalanda 4. Satish Prasad, son of Late Prayag Mahto, resident of Mohalla- Rampur(Bagnabad) Ward No. 29, Biharsharif, District-Nalanda. ……….Respondents ---------------------------------- 02. 08.08.2011 The petitioner confines his prayer for a direction to the District Magistrate, Biharsharif, Nalanda to dispose off the representation of the petitioner against constructions made by private respondents without approval of the map and in spite of the stay given by the Biharsharif Nagar Parishad on the Plot No. 1165. Let the petitioner file fresh representation ventilating his grievances before the Municipal Commissioner, Biharsharif Nagar Parishad within a period of four weeks, when it is expected that the representation of the petitioner will be disposed off within a period of two months of filing of such representation. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)