1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application (Review) No. 495/2008 in L.P.A. No. 177 of 2007 in Writ Petition No. 5870 of 2005 (Krantijyoti Savitribai Fuley Mahila Shikshan Prasarak Manadla, Mul ...VERSUS... State of Maharashtra and 3 others) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- [Mr. P.C.Madkholkar, Advocate for applicant/appellant] [Mr. A.S.Fulzele. A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3] [Mr. H.A.Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent no.4] C ORAM : D. B. BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 21st June, 2010. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant prays for withdrawal of this review application so also the Letters Patent Appeal, with liberty to the appellant/ applicant to approach the learned Single Judge seeking withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 5870 of 2005. This prayer has not been opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The Misc. Civil Application (Review) and the Letters Patent Appeal, both are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. 2 4. Liberty to the applicant/appellant to approach the learned Single Judge seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition. While granting the liberty, we shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on the request for withdrawal of the writ petition, which the appellant/ applicant propose to make before the appropriate Court. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale