IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42159 of 2010 SOUDAGAR PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 2-2-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail was earlier rejected by this Court on 4-5-2010 vide annexure-1, after considering the allegation that he has deprived the complainant of money on the promise of transferring some lands. On behalf of petitioner it has been submitted, on the basis of annexure-2, a compromise petition shown to have been filed in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Complaint Case No. 718 ( C )/2007, that parties have compromised their differences. A copy of order dated 19-7-2010 in G.R. No. 1592 of 2009 relating to Buxar (Town) P.S. Case No. 267 of 2009 has been annexed as annexure-3 in support of the plea that compromise petition has been filed in the police case arising out of the complaint case. It is not being proper to reconsider the prayer for 2 anticipatory bail once it has been rejected on merits. However, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is disposed of with a direction that petitioner should surrender before the court below within eight weeks and satisfy the learned court below that parties have filed a genuine compromise petition. If petitioner does so then he shall be allowed bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each. If cost is deposited, let this order be communicated to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (Town) P.S. Case No.267 of 2009 by fax. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)