IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 13960 of 1994 Between: A.Janardhana Rao S/o.Yagnaiah Ltd., Lalapet Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vice Chairman & Managing Director Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Paigah Palace Secunderabad. 2 Estate Officer Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Paigah Palace Secunderabad. 3 Coop.Sub-Registrar/Person-in-Charge HUDA Employees Coop.Housing Society, O/o.HUDA Secunderabad. 4 S.V.R.K.Prasad Surveyor, O/o.The Vice-Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Paigah Palace,Secunderabad. (R-4 is impleaded as per court order dt.6-2-1995) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to grant interim direction to the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority to make adjustment of the amount paid by the petitioner and handover the plot.No.B2/46 allotted to the petitioner in pursuance to the Award passed on 22-11-1988 in A.R.C.No.15/88 by the Arbitrator and orders dated 12-11-1989 of the person-in-charge of HUDA Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., to enable him to take up the construction of house early pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.KISHAN RAO (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2&3: Mr. K.J. Rao (Standing Counsel for HUDA) The Court Made the Following ORDER: This matter was initially listed yesterday i.e. 23-6-2004 high up in the list. It is an old matter and the list was circulated to the learned counsel well in advance. In spite of the same, when the matter was called yesterday, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this court, so as to give a last chance directed the office to list the case under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”. Today the matter is appearing under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”. In spite of the same none appears and the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default/ non-prosecution. No costs. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. Vice Chairman & Managing Director Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Paigah Palace Secunderabad. 2. Estate Officer Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Paigah Palace Secunderabad. 3. Coop.Sub-Registrar/Person-in-Charge HUDA Employees Coop.Housing Society, O/o.HUDA Secunderabad. 4. 2 CD copies. Js