AMENDED PETITION IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRLTPETmQN(S)NQ. 1172 / 2009 IN THE IVIATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA ; AND IN THE IWATTER OF CHHATTISGARH PANCHAYAT AND SOCIAL WELFARE CLASS III (EXECUTIVE) SERVICE RECRUITIVIENT RULES 2008 ; ANDBETWEEN PETITIONERS Sukhendra Pratap Singh, son of Shri Satya Raj Singh, aged about 24 years, resident of 27 Kholi, Vikas Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS '»* 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Public Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantrala\'a, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Director, Directorate of Panchayat and Public Welfare, Mahanadi Block, Mantralaya Parisar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Narayani Dewangan, daughter of Shri Dileshwar Prasad Dewangan, aged about 22 years, House Master, Office of Director, Directorate of Panchayat and Public Welfare, Mahanadi Block, Mantralaya Parisar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Guru Ghasidas Central University, through the Registrar, Koni, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ffilT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA )R ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF IVIANDAIVIUS, CERTIORARI AND FOR ISSUANCE OF OTHER SUITABLE WRITS, _OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS .liBEE^a 1 V3ys~~^ g i? ^ •~ •: ~ ^aK ail^r^ill<'<i+ OTI ail^l a>f M *<i*<ni (t»*<i<l» '3^ "><l<41d'4, siTil'y'is, [sidi'M^ ^^.c^..e..L^)..w.'klQ.ci....WI, 200 sn^i '(R^ (i?(3°"<4) TOiiwotor sii^i SB: Hon.Mr. Justice Pritinker Q 17.08.2011: Shri Amrito Das counsel fo)1 Shri Pravin Das Dy. GA for None for respondent No.3 Shri Ashish Shrivastava an No.4. Shri M.L. Pandey, Joint D Welfare Department and S and Social Welfare Depari before this Court. <tiii(<'t4-< iifcif'? 'fs'zt <h«ci< ^? sffitH SII^I waker |the petitioner. respondents 1 and 2. tfiough served. i|d Shri Neeraj Choubey counsel for respondent irector (Administration), Panchayat and Social hri Herman Xalko, Deputy Director, Panchayat 'ment and OIC of the case, are also present Grievance of the petitioner) post of House Master has been ill^gally ground that degree of the petition^r Management) obtained from Guru the category of either science, corrjmerce In the return filed by resporldent R/4-1) has been filed by the Uni|/ersity nomenclature of the degrees E^RTM Management) and MRTM ((Mast^r B.Sc. (RTM) & M.Sc. (RTM) hasb^en to." Further in paragraph 3 of th^ stated that the degree obtained b^ in this petition is that his candidature for the rejected by the State Government on the called as (Bachelor of Rural Technology and Ghasi Das University, Bilaspur, does not fall in or arts. No.4 a letter dated 20.6.2006 (Annsxare stating that'request for changing the ((Bachelor of Rural Technology and of Rural Technology and Management) as consideredand the same has been agreed said return, the University has categorically the petitioner falls under the science stream. rS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. iiir sn^?w R"f g«iran^i sh4i+ H11CTI fl»*1|€») 'S^I -^ww^, WT\\V , hwvy, ...^..e...L^....LD..U0.. 200 sn^r'T?^ (icit3°"i?) ?«tIStR^a ^qi^T Petitioner also has filed the docuirient dated 22.2.2010 in which it has| petitioner comes within the scienc^ th* It has been fairly submitte|d mentioned officers present in considered afresh and his Master and the appropriate *i<ifci<il"t >iw<-S 4 'fs^t <fflt<;i< ^? aiRCT sn^i of Annexure (G) along with an application been stated that the degree obtained by the stream. by the State counsel as well as the afore- Court that case of the petitioner would be candidcjture would be considered for the post of House ordervj/ould be passed within a period ofthree weeks. Thus in view ofthe aforesa^l statement made by the State counsel as well as the officers named above, noth|ing remains in the petition and accordingly the same is disposed ofwith a directict of the petitioner for the post of Hoipse Master and pass appropriate order within a period of three weeks from the dat 3 of receipt of copy of this order. SAI:nv^a( "-^r "- _J