IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.756 of 2009 (O & M) Date of decision: 18.03.2010 Managing Director, Haryana Warehousing Corporation and others .. Appellants Versus Pardeep Singh Roparia .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the appellants Mr.S.K.S.Bedi, Advocate for the respondent . . . AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) In this case, notice of motion was issued limited only to the extent that the interest had been awarded in favour of the respondent @ 9%. Learned counsel for the apellants has contended that in lieu of Section 34 of CPC, no interest, more than 6% could be awarded. However, learned counsel for the respondent has argued that the ground of excessive interest was never taken in the appeal before the learned Lower Appellate Court. In my opinion, having not been taken this plea before the learned Lower Appellate Court, the appellants could not be entitled to raise it in the Second Appeal. Consequently, this appeal as well as the stay application are dismissed. March 18, 2010 (AJAY TEWARI) Sukhpreet JUDGE