IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3568 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.7.2010 Surjit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Sh.Khushpal Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.K.S.Rekhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.D.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the revision petition is disposed of with a clarification that PW8 Harcharan Singh, who is said to have resiled from his earlier statement while being cross-examined, shall be permitted to be re- examined only in so far as the discrepancy in his statement recorded by way of examination-in-chief and the variation which has come in the cross-examination is concerned. There does not seem to be any illegality in the order which has been impugned for the reason that the Court has the power to recall any witness and put any question to him for the proper adjudication of the matter. But since the impugned order did not C.R.No.3568 of 2009 (O&M) -2- specify the extent of the examination of such a witness, the aforesaid clarification has been necessitated. 27.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss