1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 15th Day of February, 2011. IInd Bail Application No. 171 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Furkan S/o Late Haneef R/o Sisona, P.S Bhagwanpur District Haridwar ….….Applicant(In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ………..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 44 of 2010 Under Section: 304B, I.P.C. Police Station: Bhagwanpur District: Haridwar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. M.A.Khan, Brief Holder, Present for the State. Applicant Furkan, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 44 of 2010, relating to offence punishable Under Section 304B, I.P.C., Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. 2 Heard. Applicant is husband of the deceased. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected on 27.08.2010 for want of prosecution. From the perusal of papers on record it appears that applicant's wife died unnatural death within three months of the marriage with the applicant. Complainant has given the statement that demand of dowry was made and for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and the deceased was harassed. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view that it is not a fit case for granting the bail. The bail Application is rejected. (Urgency Application No. 789 of 2011stands disposed of). (Prafulla.C.Pant.,J) Dt. 15.02.2011 NP