C-482 No. 196 of 2005 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Case called out twice. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the case before the Court. Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for quashing the chargesheet No. 119/04 in Case Crime No. 170/2004, under Section 25 Arms Act pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Roorkee. Brief facts of the case are that Sri Yogendra Singh – S.O., P.S. Gangnahar, Roorkee lodged a F.I.R. against the petitioner, under Section 25 Arms Act. On the basis of the said F.I.R. a case Crime No. 170/2004 was registered, under Section 25 Arms Act and the police after investigating the matter submitted the chargesheet on 11.09.2004 which is under challenge by way of this petition. Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the documents filed before me, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. The points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner are the disputed question of facts and they can be judged by the trial court where the evidence is yet to be collected. At this stage, I am not suppose to embark upon an enquiry with regard to the reliability of the evidence which is yet to be adduced before the court during the course of the trial. Any judgment rendered by me would amount to premature judgment where the evidence is still incomplete and hazy. I do not find any merit in this case at this stage. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J.) 07.01.2008 ASWAL