IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8507 of 2011 RAVINDRA PRASAD AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.04.2011 The petitioner No.1 being alleged husband and petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 being the parents of the alleged husband are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case, in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 323, 504, 498A & 494 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that initially the complainant was married to one Azad Bind and after his death, who was the own brother of petitioner No.1 Ravindra Prasad, complainant married with Petitioner No.1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on his refusal to marry the present complaint case has been filed. Let petitioner No.1 Ravindra Prasad pay Rs.500/- per month from May, 2011 by depositing the same on every month in the account of the complainant by second week of every month. Petitioner No.1 will supply a copy of this order to 2 the complainant and the complainant will supply the account number to the petitioner No.1. Though thrust of accusation is against petitioner No.1 but it is not possible to decide the disputed question of fact with regard to marriage of petitioner No.1 with the complainant in the present proceeding, hence, let the petitioners namely, Ravindra Prasad, Ramanuj Prasad and Jaimanti Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court-below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 811 of 2008 subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)