BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION s No. Egg 12010 $§IE5EQIE EILII‘IILIII / Ramnarayan Jaiswal S/o. Madan PETITIONER x Through:- Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. /Collector, Korea, District— Korea (C.G.) 3. I/ Tahsildar, Sonhat, District Korea (C,G.) 4. / Commissioner (Land Record), Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIOS OR THE LIKE. \Q ”VJ) Lal JaiswaL aged about 64 R/o. Village Bhaiswar, years, Tahsil $g \ I Sonhat, District Korea (C.G.). $5 ?IQ(’::,.; VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. (I State of Chhattisgarh, w/ @ 3%: 31W, m m WW wfmmgla§4f goo mm (W1) WWW m 1.7.2010 Shri Sourabh Dangi, coun sel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. WWW WW1§fg$m aaa'faum rlVaS aVa . an Heard. Submission of learned c3unsel for the petitioner is that in a ' departmental enquiry, a penalw of withholding two increments was imposed on the petitioner by the District Authority, against which an appeal Was preferred before the Collector. Upon dismissal of the said petitioner submitted a representation/review before the Commissioner, but the same has remained pending since 1997. Learned counsel for the tetitioner submits that a direction may be No.4/Commissioer to decide his representation. Taking into consideration the nature of grievance raised before this Court, it would be appropriate to direct respondent No.4 to decide representation / review preferred Accordingly, respondent No.4/Commisi0ner is directed to take petitioner’s representation/review in appeal, issued to respondent by the petitioner. appropriate decision on accordance with law. /1;$ 3EU§WE§La€km§&%aRQR a$E§EEu&$ wFLéoo mm (ma): WWW 8‘ As the matter is pending same as early as possible witl' date of receipt of copy of this or With the aforesaid obser off. mmw WWW Wim @m ' amimarm since 1997, respondent shall decide the in an outer limit of 4 mothsfrom the ier. /', f e 1.; Judge Vations, the petition is finally disposed /\r »"* saéf, V L_ Manindra Mohan ShrivastaVa