IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50187 of 2008 1. SUNIL PODDAR, S/O LATE SHIVA NAND PODDAR, R/O MOHALLA-BINODPUR, P.S. KATIHAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. 2. RAJNISH SINGH, S/O SRI RAM KALYAN SINGH, R/O M.K. TRADING SHOP NO.3, VAISHALI COMPLEX, DR. R.P. ROAD, P.S. KATIHAR, DISTRICT-KATIHAR. -PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. –OPP.PARTY 2 16.12.2008 Cancellation of Distributorship agreement and refusal to refund the payment made on account of damaged goods allegedly supplied are the ingredients of the complaint. Cognizance whereon has been taken under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The Dealership agreement is between the Company and the complainant and the petitioners are employees of the Company. Considering the said state of affairs, the application of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in Katihar Sadar P.S. Case no. 234 of 2008, subject to the 2 conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad