2 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 217/2010 CHAMAN RANI & ORS Through versus Petitioners Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aakanasha Munjal, Advocate. STATE & ANR Respondents Through Mr. Pawan Behl, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN ORDER 11.02.2010 There is no appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 1, State of West Bengal though notice of the petition has been served. Vide order dated 3'^'' February, 2010, the petitioners were given interim anticipatory bail till today in order to enable them to approach the competent Court in the State of West Bengal for any appropriate relief which they thought would be available to them in law. However,they donot appearto have movedoutof Delhiandtoday,a prayer is being made on their behalf for granting them some more time. It is stated that the petitionersno. 3,5&6have smallchildrenand someofthemhave to appearinthe Board Exams and so, they couldnot got to West Bengal.It is also statedthat all the petitioners are poorpeopleand they couldnot make financialarrangementsalso. BAIL APPLN. 217/2010 page 1 of2 Signing Date:01.08.2024 16:52:56 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Considering all the facts and circumstances, this petition is disposed of by extending the interim relief granted to the petitioners for another period of two weeks. Dasti. FEBRUARY 11, 2010 rs BAIL APPLN. 217/2010 P.K. BHASIN,J page 2 of2 H