Civil Revision No. 3626 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3626 of 2010 Date of decision : 26.5.2010 Gurdev Singh ....Petitioner Versus Raj Pal ......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. R.S.Athwal, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. The essential grievance of the petitioner is that there has been inordinate delay in the disposal of an execution application filed by him for execution of the decree dated 6.2.2007 which has been granted in his favour in ejectment petition No.39 of 2005 and which authorised him to evict the respondent-tenant from the tenanted premises. In support of the averment that the adjournments are being granted without any justified cause, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner invites attention of this Court to the interim orders quoted in the petition itself. A perusal thereof would indicate that there is justification for the grievance averred on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above noticed facts, the petition shall stand disposed of in with a direction to the learned Trial Court to prepone the execution application from 4.9.2010 to 14.6.2010 and dispose it of in accordance with law. The preponement shall ofcourse be noticed to the party opposite. The disposal of this petition in limine, with a view to expedite Civil Revision No. 3626 of 2010 -2- **** the disposal of the proceedings, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. Disposed of accordingly. May 26, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Civil Revision No. 3626 of 2010 -3- ****