1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2637/2009 (Jalindar Uttam Bhople and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.S.Barlota, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. P.M.Shinde, APP for the respondent ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 3/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel. 2. The marriage between the wife and the present applicant/accused has been solemnized on 27.3.2003. They are blessed with a four year old female child. The bickering and alleged demand by the husband and other relations, to the extent of Rs.50,000/- is the root cause, giving rise to alleged incident dt.8.7.2009, when the wife was allegedly doused with poisonous substance. She was referred by the husband and other relations to hospital. She was in unconscious condition and remained in the hospital for considerable period. The Counsel argues, the delay in the FIR speaks volumes against the very nature of the allegations. There could not be dousing of poison by the husband 2 or relations and hence urged for pre-arrest bail. 3. The above stated facts collectively do not warrant to exercise of discretion as enumerated under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. Considering the gravity in a condensed form, referred in the FIR of the wife, application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/crapl2637-09