IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15769 of 2011 Durga Murmur Versus Dagga Marandi & Ors ---------------------------------- 05. 21.10.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 14.12.2010 passed by Sub Judge-I, Purnea in Title Suit No.228 of 1998 whereby the Court below rejected the application filed by the petitioner suggesting the issue regarding that the parties are governed by their customary law and Ghar Jamai is also entitled to inherit the property of father-in-law. The apprehension of the petitioner is only that the Court may not decide this issue in the suit because the said issue has not been framed. The learned counsel admitted the fact that both the parties have adduced their evidence. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Court has clearly mentioned that this issue shall be considered at the time of Judgment in the suit and, therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner appears to be only mere apprehension. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is at liberty to submit / argue before the Court below regarding this issue and if such points were raised, the Court below shall decide the same. With this observation, this writ application is disposed of Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)