... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7831 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7831 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7831 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1126 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Ms S.V.Gajare, A.P.P for the State. Shri Anoop Pandy holding for Mrs Manjula Rao for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. DATE : NOVEMBER 15, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the Applicant and the learned Advocate for the Respondents. The Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate appearing for the Respondents by pointing out that there is a gross delay in applying for certified copy. After perusing the Application I am satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE