:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2007 Devendra B. Singh ..Applicant Vs. 1. State of Maharashtra and anr. ..Respondents Mr. Rajesh S. Sharma for applicant. Ms. A.A. Mane, APP for State. Mr. Jagdish Choudhary i/by Nankani & Associate for respondent no.2. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date : November 12, 2008. Date : November 12, 2008. Date : November 12, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant-original accused, learned Advocate for respondent no.2-original complainant and the learned APP for the State. The applicant-accused and the respondent no.2-complainant are present in the court. 2. The applicant has been convicted by the learned Magistrate under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed. Hence, this revision application. :2: 3. The learned Advocate for the complainant has stated that during the pendency of this revision, the parties have amicably settled the matter among themselves and consent terms have been tendered, which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 4. In view of the fact that the matter has been amicably settled and in view of the consent terms, the matter is disposed of in terms of the consent terms and offence is compounded and the applicant is acquitted therein. 5. Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.)