p— ^^ Petjtioner Respondents HSGH COURT OF CHHATTSSQARH: BiLASPUR Writ Petition No. 1343 of 2003 S.K. Mohanty, son of Shri Krishna Prasad Mohanty, aged 46 years hoSding the coveted post of the Assistant Genera! Manager, Dena Bank, Regional office, Rukhmani Bhavan, Raipur (CG), resideni of 13/5 Shrimahaiaxmi Nagar, Katora Ta(ab Road, Civi! Lines road, Raipur, CG. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Aff^irs, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The SpeciaJ Police, Scheduied Caste & Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrodties Durg. 2. 3. S.K. Das, son of Shri Subodh Kumar Das, aged about 55 years, Branch Manager, Dena Bank, Surana Compiex, Station Road, Durg, resident of 303, Nandi Parisar, Padmanabhpur, Durg (CG). Present: (Writ P©titionunder Article 226/227 of Constltution of India) SB: Hon'ble Wr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Mr. B.P.Sharma, Advocate with Mr. K. Sharma, Advocate for the petltioner. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the Stete. Mr. B.D. Guru, counsel for the respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 16th day of January, 2009) 8y this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the first information report registered on the basis of false report of the respondent No.3 against the petitioner under Section 3 (1) of the Scheduied Castes & Scheduied Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and also under various other provisions of the Indian Penal Code. Further, the petitioner seeks a direction agasnstthe respondents No. 1 and 2/State for nottakjng any action on the basis ofthe first Information report. - z- 2) Mr. Vinay Harit, learned Deputy Advocate Generai appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 and 2 submlts that on the basis of retum dated 19<8" 2003, no offence was registered against the petltioner nor any enquiry was conducted as prima facie, it was found that the offence was not made out. He further submits that the ailegation ofthe petitioner that the flrst information was reglstered against the pefitioner on a complaint made by the respondent No.3 is incorrect without any basis. 3) In view of the foregoing, nott^ing sun/ives for acljudication in the matter. Aecordingiy, the petition is dismissed. Consequentiy, M.W.P.No.1226 of 2003 for grant of ad-interim reSief also stands dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge