IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2009 / 16TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 22382 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ G.PRIDHVIPAL, VILAKKATTUKOYIKAL, PANANGADU PO VIA KULANADA, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. MR. K.R.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR MR. A.RENJIT RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER AND SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPN, THIRUVANATNHAPURAM. 4. THE MANAGER, SRI RAM GROUP OF COMPANIES, DOOR NO.16/130C, GEETHA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NEAR YMCA, MC ROAD, KOTTAYAM-1. 5. K.K.SADASIVAN PIILAI, KANNAAGATTU VEEDU, KAIPPUZHA, PANANGADU PO, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST/. 6. SHINE RAJ S, NANDANAM, PANNIYALIL, OMALLUR, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.NARAYANAN R3 BY ADV. MR. UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: kkms/ V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 22382 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 7th August,2009 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner essentially arises out of the directions issued under Ext.P6 judgment to which he was not a party. Remedy of the petitioner is to seek a review of the judgment or modification of the directions issued therein. In such circumstances, I do not find my way to issue a direction as sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in relation to Ext.P6. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3