3 PAG ?id» c. •NIIINUNIIU'INN BEFORE THE HOIOURAa.E STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TBIBUNALS, RAIP0R BENCH AT RAIPHR(M.P.). (-O^fcJ? 1^0)03'' In the natter of O.A.No.s BETMEEN PARMESHffAR DEHR.I, Asstt.Teaeher ^son of Budhiiath Dehri, Ckivt.Sefaool Charaidand, Tahsil Kunliari, Dist-fc.Jask^ur. VERS0S 1. State of M.P., througb.Secretary, Tribal Qevelopaent, Qovt.of M.P. Vallabfa Bhawan, Bhopal. 2. Deputy Secretary (Avar Saehiv) State of N.P., Aadim Jati Tatfaa Anusuchit Jati Kalyan Vibhag, VallatA Bhawaa Bfaopal M.P. Connissioner, Iribal Developaent, Raigarh Divisipn, Raigarh M.P. 4. Addi'tioaal Goaaissioner, Triteal Bevelopment, Raigarh M.P. 5. Block Edueation Offieer Block Jasl^tur, Bistt.Jashpur M.P. APPLICATION 8 )Bt SECTION 19_of •bhe_ABMINISTRATIVE T&IHJNAL ACT. sn^r'w fc-li.'ii SII^I ^TtTT^ "^TT^cT Tumsn? ^"SET ^|[4||dq, dtflyici. fiidiyy SJT^T 'q'ra? yiA.<S:}...y.'..^l^^l "^ 200Js' •nwirsfTHi^) ig^^r' SIT^I's^nWHita SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 09-03-2010 Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Shri Ajit Singh, Panet Lawyer With the consent of learned heard finally. By this petition, the petitioner 1999, bywhioh, he was transferred. prayed that salary of the petitionei] released. In the return, jt has been petitioner has joined on the transfer) treating his absence from 18-11-19J notice was issued to the petitioner or| the entire period be not treated as| wjthholding of two annual inoremj imposed. Learned counsel for the latest instruotions as to what orderfe notice dated 27-05-2000. This petition is finally disposj approach the Court, if any adverse ^. notice dated 27-05-2000 including period from 18-11-1999to 19-04-200(3 cftT^I^I'f HTH^ ^ f^%l •(Pl^K ^T sr^m sn^r Shrivastava. J. c^unsel for the petitioner. Ibr the State. jounsel for the parties, the petition is Ifias challenged the order dated 09-07- |ln the petition, the petitioner has also which has been withheld, be also ^tated by the respondents that the place of posting on 20-04-2000 and )?9 to 19-04-2000 as unauthorized. A 27-05-2000 to show cause as to why dies non and as to why penalty of ;nts with cumulath/e effeot be not petitfoner submits that he does not have rder^ were passed pursuant to the said id of with liberty to the petitioner to [iction has been taken pursuant to the hjs olaim of salary in respect of the Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge r"!T'A '^^.t