1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6747/2008. (SMT. GEETA PANWAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.) DATE OF ORDER : 05.01.2009. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. D.L.R. Vyas for the petitioner. By notice dated 12.08.2008, the District Education Officer (Elementary), Jaisalmer instructed the petitioner to submit certain documents required for consideration the candidature of the petitioner for appointment as Prabodhak under Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008. Being aggrieved by the same, this petition for writ is preferred. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the required documents were already submitted by the petitioner and as such there was no need to ask for the same. It is also pointed out that in pursuant to the notice Annexure 8, all the formalities were again completed by the petitioner by submitting necessary documents. This matter was listed before the Court on 08.09.2008 and thereafter on 27.09.2008 giving opportunity to the petitioner to produce adequate evidence to substantiate the 2 contention that necessary documents were submitted by the petitioner to the competent authority i.e. District Education Officer (Elementary Education). No steps have yet been taken and as such there is no evidence available on record to presume that the petitioner submitted required documents. In view of it, I do not find any wrong with the notice Annexure 6 and in rejection of the petitioner's candidature. The petitioner should have submitted required documents. Accordingly, the petition for writ is having no merit, same is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/