IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2011 / 10TH ASHADHA 1933 Mat.Appeal.No. 117 of 2003(F) ----------------------------- OP.461/1996 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------ S.VIJAYALAKSHMI @ REKHA, 7/270, PUPADY HOUSE, KOOVAPADAM, KOCHI 682 002. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.P.R.RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. C.V.RAMESH, S/O.C.S.VAMANAN, CHITTAYIL HOUSE, VADUTHALA, KOCHI - 23. 2. BINU, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI, CHITHAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADUTHALA, KOCHI - 23. 3. JOSHY, S/O.KOCHU ANTO, MANDEKKATTU HOUSE, VADUTHALA, KOCHI - 23. ADV. SMT.MARY TERESA DIES FOR R1 SRI.S.RAJEEV FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01.07.2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- Mat.Appeal No.117 of 2003 ----------------------------------------------- Dated 1st July, 2011. J U D G M E N T Joseph, J. It is submitted that it was stated before this Court that the appeal is not pressed, by a mistake. Actually, what is intended to be submitted was that there is no instruction in the matter. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that communications by registered post were sent to the party and they were returned with the endorsement 'addressee left and whereabouts not known'. In the light of the specific submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, we dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Sd/- K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE. Sd/- M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE. tgs