1 wp175210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1752 OF 2010 Inayatulla Abdul Gafoor Bharde ...Petitioner VERSUS Abdul Gani Ali Bharde & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. U.B. Nighot for the Petitioner Mr. Mubin Solkar with Ms. Tahera Qureshi for Respondents No. 1 and 3 to 5. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE: 16TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, the grievance of the petitioner that investigation has not been properly carried out is a matter which can be looked into by the concerned Court, particularly because there is no averment in the 2 wp175210 petition which would persuade us to take the view that the Investigating Officer was working in collusion with the accused. The vague allegations made in paragraphs 18 and 19 of the petition do not commend us, especially when it has come now on record that the Investigating Officer has already filed charge-sheet against the named accused in the petition. It is open to the concerned Court to issue appropriate directions, including to undertake further investigation, if the situation so warrants. Since the petitioner has alternative, efficacious remedy, the question of entertaining this Writ Petition does not arise. The petitioner is free to take recourse to such other remedies as may be permissible in law. Petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue such other remedies as may be permissible in law. All questions are left open. A.P. BHANGALE, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.