IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR‘(C.G.) WR‘IT PETITION (S) NO. ,$% 12010 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; AND IN THE MATTER OF CHHATTISGARH PANCHAYAT AND SOCIAL WELFARE, CLASS III (EXECUTIVE) SERVICE RECRUITMENT RULES, ' 2008 ; AND BETWEEN : PETITIONER r“ Madhu Sudan Bajpai, son of Shri Ba‘chhulal Bajpai, aged about 46 years, presently posted as Warden, Government Blind and Deaf School, Mathpurainax Raipur‘ District Raipur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS R‘ESPONDENTS /' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Department of Social Welfare, Mantralaya DtK.S Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh / 2t Director, Directorate of Panchayat and Social Services, DKS Bhawan, Mahanadi Block, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3, Joint Director, Directorate of Panchayat and Social Services, DKS Bhawan‘, Mahanadi Block, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ,WRIT PETITION UNDER ART'C'E 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROP' /’WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND FOR ISSUANCE OF //,R SUITABLE WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONJ ORDER OR ORDERS Amrito Das, Advocate ‘ m : gwt; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / WRIT FETITION (S) N0. 1329 of2010 : Madhu Sudan Bajpai; VERSUS RESP'ONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K, Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A. G. for the State/re3pondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed or: 29 day of March, 2010) 1. Learned counsel apoearing for the petitioner, on 'instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, the respondents may Be directed to consider and decide his pending representations dated 26.05.2007 (Annexure P/17), 27.11.2009(Annexure P/18) and 21.12.2009 (Annexure P/19) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Moorthy, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents submits that inthe event, the representations, as aforestated, are pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition at this stage. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. /