1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11215 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 21680 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants Versus Rupchand Swarupchand Jadhav .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11217 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 21689 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants Versus Rupchand Hiraman Gopal .. Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11219 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 21686 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants Versus Motabai Shankar Vanjari and another .. Respondents 2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11221 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 21677 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants Versus Sadashiv Punamchand Gopal .. Respondent Smt. R. K. Ladda, A.G.P. for Applicants in all matters. Shri V. B. Patil, Advocate for the Respondents in all matter. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08TH OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : . These are the applications filed for condonation of delay in filing first appeals against the impugned judgment and award. Shri Patil, learned counsel for the respondent resists applications on the ground that no sufficient cause has been stated. 2. Smt. Ladda, learned Assistant Government Pleader states that, the delay has been caused because of the administrative reasons. After the appeal was drafted by B panel counsel, it 3 transpired that the court fees was not accompanied and thereafter again requisition was made for court fees. After receipt of the same, the appeal has been immediately filed. Taking into consideration the reasons stated, the delay is condoned. The applications are allowed and disposed of accordingly. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Oct. 10