IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1291 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.129 OF 2005 1 Balaji Pandurang Shembekar Deceased by his legal heirs 1A Shashikant Balaji Shembekar & Ors. ...Applicants. v. Keshav Dattatray Shembekar Since deceased by his legal heirs 1A Smt. Malti Keshav Shembekar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. S.G.Deshmukh, adv. For the Appellants. Mr.Rajendra Satale i/by Pradip Kadam, advs. For the Respondent Nos. 1A, 1D and 5. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 17th September , 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 This application is filed only to clarify that stay, which is already granted, continues during the pendency of this appeal. Record reveals that on 15th March, 2005, this Court had directed that the impugned decree shall not be executed for a period of four weeks from that date. That order was extended from time to time. It appears that thereafter appeal itself was dismissed in default due to non-compliance of certain conditional order . However, appeal was again restored to the file by order dated 13.3.2006 in Civil Application No.83/06. Application - 2 - was allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (d) and (e). Prayer clause (d) was “ to restore interim relief granted by this Hon’ble Court on 15.3.2005”. Thus, that interim relief was restored and there is nothing to show that it was extended upto particular date. Meanwhile, appeal has been admitted. Property in dispute was certain coins, which were to be distributed between the different shareholders, as per the decree. In view of the circumstances, it is made clear that interim relief granted on 15.3.2005 shall continue to be in force pending the final hearing and disposal of the appeal. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)