IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8523 of 2007 1. RAGHUNATH SINGH, SON OF LATE RAJ NARAIN SINGH 2. NARENDRA SINGH, SON OF RAGHUNATH SINGH 3. SATYENDRA SINGH, SON OF LRAGHUNATH SINGH 4. BHUPENDRA SINGH, SON OF LRAGHUNATH SINGH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GARKHA, P.S. GARKHA, DISTIRCIT SARAN. 5. SHATRUGHAN SINGH, SON OF SHEO BALAK SINGH 6. BINOD SINGH, SON OF SHATRUGHAN SINGH BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAUZAMPUR RAMU TOLA, P.S. GARKHA, DISTRICT SARAN. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. FULAINA MANJHI, SON OF LATE LAXMAN MANJHI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GARKHA, P.S. GARKHA, DISTRICT SARAN. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh No.1, Adv. For the State : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. ----------- 4. 11.10.2010. In the present case, in some and substance, the petitioners are aggrieved with the order of cognizance so far as Section 3(X) of the Scheduled Case/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is concerned. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in any event offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is not applicable. The order of cognizance was challenged before the revisional court. However, revisional court, without deciding the case on merit only on the ground of maintainability, has rejected the same. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to 2 N.H./ withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the points, which have been raised in the present case or any other point, if available, at appropriate stage before the concerned court. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as indicated above. I may indicate that in this case, interim order of stay was continuing since 29.3.2007. It is expected that if petition is filed at appropriate stage before the concerned court, the learned court below will examine the same and pass an appropriate order without being prejudiced with rejection of this petition. With above observation and direction, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In this case, interim order of stay stands automatically vacated. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)