IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 760 of 2008 Smt. Mamta @ Mamtesh & another. .......... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. .......... Respondents Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the other accused persons but the present petitioners have not been chargesheeted as during the investigation no prima facie evidence is collected against them, as such the police is proposed to submit final report against the petitioner before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 26.09.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 12.02.2009 V.K.