1 AOG-654.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.654 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.833 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.654 OF 2010 Kiran Magas Vargi Nivara Seve Chawl Committee & Anr. .... Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri S.U. Pandey for the Appellants. Shri A.R. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: AUGUST 03, 2010 P.C: The appellants do not deserve to be shown indulgence but since an ad-interim order was in force since 21-6-2008 and was vacated by the learned Judge on 7-6-2010 after finding that the plaintiffs were trying to protract the matter by seeking an amendment to the plaint at that stage after two years. Even so, since an ad-interim order was in force for about two years and since the notice of motion is not yet decided, the parties shall appear before the 2 AOG-654.10 learned trial Judge on 12-8-2010 and the learned trial Judge shall not grant any adjournment; hear the parties and then decide the notice of motion within a period of 15 days after the hearing is complete. Till then the ad-interim order passed on 21-6-2008 to remain in force. The appeal is disposed of in above terms. Since the main appeal itself has been disposed of, Civil Application No.833 of 2010 also stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)