c^ /a?7Z 5 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.') WRITAPPEALNO. \^& OF 2010 6^ APPELLANT PETITIONER Dashnath Singh Son of Mangglu Singh Adivasi Gond, aged about 60 years, Resident of Village Pathakpur, Post Kalyanpur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPQNDENTS V- \ ^/ / / ^&^/ ^^fy ^^:<^/ .jj"0>/ /v -?-' .•fv ^. .-• ^' .. Jt^ ^* <-~^' 1. State of Madhya Pradesh, through The Secretary, Department of Forest, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, (M.P.). 2. The Sub Divisional Officer <Forest), South Production, Surguja Van Mandal, (C.G.). 3.'" The Divisional Forest Officer, North Surguja Division, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.). 4. "^The Conservator of Forest, Production, Surguja Van Mandal, (C.G.). .^*.. ; • .• • •• ........ WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1} OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH fAPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCHV ACT, 2Q06 « v!: IBGH COORT OF CHHaT'nSGARH AT KUJUM'OR D.B: ApseUant; Resppadents: Hoa'bteSUEtI.M.^uddusi, Hoa'toteaBi^lKiK.AearwaI.JJ. mritADaeal<Ht|3W<».1460/a010 , ^ DasIinatliSn^U Vs. State ofMadIitya Pradesh aad otfaers ApEearaace; Mr. Asbok Kumar ShuMa, GQunselfor the appeUant. Mx^ Yashwant Smgfa Tfaakur^ Deputy Advocate Geueral, for theSlate/respouident&onad^reuacecoyy. , kWrifeAppealamder Sectaon 2 (M oftliecaUtattiMiarh Hitdt Court ItAiMiefd&'ttf IMvlsion Beueitf^Aiet. 3C |6 ;;i®BALyMtOKt, :~: /;' -. %:-'.^^:: .:.'•, •^-;',^tpjo®.i<y.oi^'•^ ••^•':';'^:"''1;1::: ^:;:^ pwjSMSsssjwws^yy.^ ::y: :..:'':^3''.^' •••::•!.:':: }..'r^- : ^; Heai^fifia3^wi0i;t^cx)xise^ 2. TIus writ appeal has toeen ffled agamst the .unpygned cunder dafed l61:h February, 2010 passed by tfae leamed Siagle au<lgeiaW.P(^.No. 1530/2005 dtemissu^tliesaitiwrit petttion. , • , ; • : : . 3. Tfae wrk appellauf was jmtm11y ap^ Guard in ihe year 1968. Tfaere wen; alfcgations against lum regardiiiyhfe jiwolsemeitt in ooHunit^^ tlieft of tim.lxr, CdosequeiiUy ^ enquii^ was conducted,^^^ a^ a. resiilt of which, lus servjees werc terariaated "•rade order dated 10.08.1980. Beside&l^at,-a^ tegisteie<t agaiastlhun, whic^ Teinairied pesndtng ffEis©rinuBal ";i3E^e Np.5^2/1992 and tfie .satfie was^decided ia^ tjye y^ar 1993 aGguityag^?luia c>f^^Be|[G^ 'Niereafter,^itBe ^r^ appeUant on fhe basis 6f Ns acqtuttal, claiiaed his reinstatement in service after a loiig tune fhat too in the year 1997. 4. We have seen fhe impugned order of termination of services of writ appeHant dsted 10.08.1980 which is not based on aay criminal case or crinunal chai^e. The enquiry proceedings were independent and fhey had no concerawith any cruninal chai^e aad therefore, fhe petitioner caxinot claiia his reiastateinent or quashing of the impugned order oftermination on the basis ofacquittal ia fhe criminal case. 5. The leamed siagle judge has dismissed fhe writ petition vide iDipugned order dated 16-02-2010, which we confirm as we have not fbynd any iUegality, impK^^ or mairifest^rror of latriD. the saiae. The writ appeal is ausGODCeived. aad is, therefisire, dismissed. SidA I.M.Quddusi Judge - Sd/- , : N.K.Agrawal Judge {"'.. Raa