IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10545 of 2010 UMESH NUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier dismissed twice because the petitioner bears three identifications in a case under section 395 of IPC. The reason pointed out by the learned trial judge in his rejection order is that the record was received by the office of his on 8.5.2009 and the same was put up before him on 30.1.2010. It is also pointed out that some of the accused persons who were on bail, were neither appearing nor making any proper pairvi before the learned trial judge. Thus, it appears that the reasons were sufficiently there for the trial not being taken up and those reasons were on account of the accused persons. In that view of the matter, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is dismissed inspite of the fact that he is in custody since 27.10.2007. It is expected that the learned trial judge, hence forth, ensure that the witnesses are produced before him at regular intervals and that no unnecessary adjournment is granted to the prosecution. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)