1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5285 of 2009 (Rambhau M. Rahate and others v. Padmakar W. Kulat) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. S/Shri R.L. Khapre and R.G. Kavimandan, Advocates for Petitioners. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The Courts below have rejected temporary injunction to petitioners/plaintiffs concurrently. Some of the reasons are that the vendor from whom the plaintiffs claimed to have purchased the property was already dead and the purchase price in alleged sale-deed was less than the price paid by the said deceased-vendor to his vendor. In view of these reasons, it is apparent that no case is made out warranting interference in concurrent orders in writ jurisdiction. Direction to expedite the civil suit at this juncture cannot be issued, because the proceedings in the said civil suit are already stayed in Writ Petition No.4354 of 2007, which is still pending. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE pdl.