IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2010 / 8TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2785 of 2010(W) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- KIRUBA.P, LPSA (TAMIL) DYMOCK LPS, VANDIPERIYAR, D/O.PITCHAI, AGED 30 YEARS, DYMOCK ESTATE, DYMOCK.P.O, VANDIPERIYAR, IDUKKI. BY ADV.MR.C.S.MANILAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, DIRECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, IDUKKI AT THODUPUZHA. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PEERMADE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGER, LUTHERN L.P.S, DYMOCK, VANDIPERIYAR, IDUKKI. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss SIRI JAGAN, J -------------------- W.P.©.NO.2785 OF 2010 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of 2010 J U D G N E N T The petitioner is working as a LPSA (Tamil) in the 4th respondent's school, which appointment was approved by Ext.P1 order. She was appointed in a retirement vacancy of one Sri. Jyothinayagam. But the manager mistakenly mentioned in the appointment order that the petitioner’s appointment was in the promotion vacancy of one Sri. Suresh, whose promotion was later cancelled. Realising the mistake, the AEO and the Manager requested the DPI to regularise the appointment of the petitioner as an appointment in the retirement vacancy of Sri. Jyothinayakam. Despite Ext.P2, P3 and P4 letters from the petitioner, the manager and the AEO, there is no response in the matter from the DPI. In the above circumstances, the petitioner submitted Ext.P5 before the first respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. W.P.©.No.2785/2010 2 3. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of the case directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE SOU.