IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35276 of 2010(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- VISHNU BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 17 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER BALAKRISHNAN, VENCHAL VEEDU, PANDANAD P.O., CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, DELHI – 110 006. 2. REGIONAL OFFICER, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI REGION, NEW NO.3, J BLOCK 16TH MAIN ROAD, CHENNAI 40 ANNA NAGAR (W), CHENNAI 40. 3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI REGION, NEW NO.3 J BLOCK, 16TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR (W), CHENNAI-40. 4. PRINCIPAL, JAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA, CHENNITHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DIST, KERALA-690 105. R1 & R2 BY SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, S.C, C.B.S.E. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 35276 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he was a student of Thalappanangad L.P.School, Chengannur. According to the petitioner, there occurred a mistake in his date of birth in the school records. According to him, instead of 20/3/93, his date of birth has been recorded as 25/5/94. It is stated that subsequently when he joined the school of the 4th respondent, his date of birth was recorded on the aforesaid erroneous basis. Seeking correction of the above, he made Ext.P4 application to the 4th respondent, who has now forwarded the application to the 2nd respondent. It is stated that the 2nd respondent has not so far passed orders on the application. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, such an application has been made by him, it is necessary that the 2nd respondent should consider the said application in the light of the documents produced by the petitioner and in the light of the remarks offered by the 4th respondent. This the 2nd respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of WPC No. 35276/10 :2 : production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp