IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2011 / 3RD SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20173 of 2011(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. SHERSHAD.M.P., MADHURIMA HOUSE, PURAMERI.P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 503. 2. JOJU JOHN JOSEPH, MALEKUDY HOUSE, OLAMATTOM, THODUPUZHA-685 584. 3. DEEPAK.S.V., KANNAMBATH HOUSE, MANIYUR.P.O., PAYYOLI, KOZHIKODE-673 523. 4. PRAVEEN PHILIP SUNNY, KIZHUKAKUNNEL ESTATE, THAZHATHANGADY.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 005, IDUKKI DT. 5. JOHN JOSE THOTTAM, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, GOVT.H.S. ROAD, MOOVATTUPUZHA-686 661. 6. VINU ANAND.S., MANU NIVAS- PARASSERY, KANIYAMKUNNU U.C.C.-P.O., ALUVA-683 102. BY ADVS. SRI.T.J.MICHAEL, SRI.JOSE MATHEW KAVALAKALAM. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY.P.O., KOCHI-682 022. REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY.P.O., KOCHI-682 022. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.20173/2011-V: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF FIRST PETITIONER DTD. 24/06/2011. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF SECOND PETITIONER DTD. 24/06/2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF P.3. DTD. 18/04/2011. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF P.4. DTD. 26/05/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF P.5. DTD 28/06/11. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF P.6 DTD. NIL. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 20173 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application sfor revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge