w ai c; v\\ HIGH COORT Oy CaHEHAmSCARH. BU.ASPUR DB: HOS'Btxasaasaiiu.saf&Mt.StVfHA. HOK'BfcE SHRI R.L. JHAMWAR. J. <». PBTITIOHBR RBSPOMDBN'ra WRIT PBTITION MO. 6016/200S Vijay Kumar Gupta, s/o Late shri Kapil Prasad Gupta, R/o Tapkara, District Jashpur (C.Cr.). Versua 1. State of Chliattisgarb, Through the Secretaiy, Departmcnt ofTraasport, Raipur(C.G). 2. R.T.A., Chhattisgarh state, Raipur (C.O). 3. SIui Stephen Khalkfao, s/o Jotui KhaBcho, resident of Lodlupaia, Jashpiu', Distt. Jashpiu- (C.G.) ^^ WMT PETITIOJK U»DBR^tmeUBM6/;!!&7^WJE2tB CQireTTnmoKopimMA '' ABpeaMince: Mr. Santosh Gupta, counsel for the Petitioner. Sfari Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Qeneral with Shri Suryal^at Mishra, PaDd Laroyei, fiM-tfaff State/respoadents iio.l &2. Shri F.S. Khare, Gouaselforrespondcntno.3. li iJUi-1-1--1 ORDBR ( 07.09.atM)91 --—ThefollowingorderoftheCourtwaspassedby . °8aailKamarSiaha, J Mr. Santosh Gupte, learaed cottasel for &e petitioner, ia virar of the subsequent devetopmcnts wfaioh have taken place dUEuig the peudency of tlie writ petition, seeks permission to withdraw |ttus it)etition with a Ubert^ to avail at>t)rot>iiatc renied^ bcfore the S'TAT; k? W.PNo.6016/2005 Raipur. However, hc prays for making some observatioa ia relatioa to the limitation whicfa is Bkely to coiae ia the way of fiting an appropnate appUcation before tfae STAT. Not opposed. Prayer is aUowed. Writ Petition No.6016/2005 is dismisscd ^ wifhdrawn wifh a liberty to the petitioner to laove STAT by fiting appropriate proceedings befoie it. It is also observed that since a long period has elapsed, therefore, if an application for coadonation ofdelay isffled, fhe STAT may consider it syiitpafheticaUy with a view to decide thc niatter on xnerits. No costs, Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge > IH