CRM No.M-35817 of 2011(O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-35817 of 2011(O & M) Date of decision: 05.12.2011 Joginder Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.J.S. Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Section 439 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking regular bail in FIR No.62 dated 30.03.2007 registered under Sections 302, 307, 452, 506, 148 and 149 IPC at Police Station Model Town, Ludhiana. 2. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court for regular bail which was rejected by this Court on March 11, 2011 and the following order was passed:- "This is a petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. Earlier the petitioner had filed Criminal Misc. Application No.M-19464 of 2009, which was dismissed on 27.07.2009. The operative part of the said order reads as under: “ The petitioners had earlier CRM No.M-35817 of 2011(O & M) ::2:: approached this Court by way of Crm-M-18378 of 2008 and Crm-M-27597 of 2008 which were dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide orders dated 24.07.2008 and 30.10.2008, respectively. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, no ground to grant regular bail to the petitioners is made out. Dismissed.” After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, I find no ground to grant regular bail. The bail application is accordingly dismissed. However the trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously preferably within six months and send periodical report for perusal of this Court.” 3. As reported by the office, the communication received from the trial court for extension of time was allowed by this Court on 28.09.2011 and in view of the facts given in the said communication, time has been extended till 30th June, 2012. 4. Finding no merit in the petition, the present petition is dismissed. 5. It is, however, directed that the trial court shall ensure and comply with the orders of this Court and conclude the trial by 30th June, 2012. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE December 05, 2011 sukhpreet CRM No.M-35817 of 2011(O & M) ::3:: CRM No.M-35817 of 2011(O & M) ::4::