IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 4970 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NAZAR.K.C, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.SAID MUHAMMED KANJOORPUTHEPURAYIL HOUSE, RANDAR, MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SAJI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VAZHAKKULAM. 5. SEETHAL THANKARAJ, W/O.THANKARAJ EROTTICKAL HOUSE, CHATTUPARA KARA MADAKKATHANAM PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. 6. THANKARAJ EROOTTICKAL HOUSE WP(C).No. 4970 of 2009(N) -2- CHATTUPARA KARA MADAKKATHANAM PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. 7. KARUNAKARAN, S/O. KUNJUMON KANJIRAMPARAYIL HOUSE, MADAKKATHANAM PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. 8. PRASAD, S/O. MUTHUSAMY VENGOD HOUSE, CHATTUPARA, NAGAPUZHA PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. 9. SABU, S/O.KRISHNAN KOTTEKUPURATH HOUSE, CHATTUPARA NAGAPUZHA PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. ADDL.R10 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 5.3.09 IN IA 2733/09 ADDLR.10. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADDL.R11 AND 12 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 5.3.09 IN IA 3024/09. ADDL.R11. THE SECRETARY, MANJALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUVATTUPUZHA. ADDL.R12. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI FOR R5-R9 SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM FOR R11 SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS,SC,POLL.C.BOAR FOR ADDL.R10 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 4970 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------- DATED:MARCH 27, 2009. JUDGMENT Raman, J. In the absence of any licence issued by the competent authority, the petitioner could not effectively press for the reliefs. Since the application is only moved now after the filing of the writ petition, petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to approach this court on a later occasion, if need arises. With the liberty sought for, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. mt/-