IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41542 of 2009 SHIEKH QUAMUDDIN @ SK.KEYAMUDDIN SON OF LATE SK. DUKHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 1.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was the informant of the case with regard to the murder of his daughter but subsequently six months later he was implicated on the evidence of certain witnesses, who stated that it is the petitioner, who had murdered his daughter, but there is no explanation as to why for six months none of the witnesses reported the same to any authority, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 13.8.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., West Champaran at Bettiah in Inarwa P.S.case No.13 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for - 2 - charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )