IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.347 of 2008 BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA Versus THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA &ORS ----------- 2 26/03/2010 The petitioner filed this writ application when a notice under section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 was issued to him on 1.11.2007. No legal infirmity in the said notice has been pointed out except that the learned counsel for the petitioner expressed his desire to settle the dispute with the Bank in the light of the statement and offer made in the Lok Adalat. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that since the notice relates to the year 2007, one does not know the present status as to what has been the follow up action in this regard but if the recovery has not reached its logical end by subsequent action under section 13(4) of the Act etc. then in terms of the desire of the petitioner he may approach the bank who may settle the dispute in accordance with the prevalent circular in existence. - 2 - This writ application stands disposed of with the above observation. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)