IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37518 of 2009 1. RAM EKBAL RAI S/O SINGHESHWAR RAI VILL.- BHATAUKIYA, P.S.- MOTIPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 2. RAM SURAT RAI S/O SINGHESHWAR RAI VILL.- BHATAUKIYA, P.S.- MOTIPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 3. RAM SIRISH RAI @ RAM SHRESHTH RAI S/O SINGHESHWAR RAI VILL.- BHATAUKIYA, P.S.- MOTIPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR 4. MANJOOR S/O ABDUL AZIZ 5. JALLU S/O ABDUL AZIZ 6.FARUKH S/0 ABDUL AZIZ 7. JAMAL S/O ABDUL AZIA 8. NAZROOL S/O MANJOOR ( ALL ARE R/O VILL. RAMPURUGAN P.S. MOTIPUR, DIST. MUZAFFARPUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and State. Petitioners, who are eight in numbers, have approached this Court seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 307 of the Penal Code and Section 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act. As per allegation in the F.I.R. the informant was way laid by the accuseds while he was returning home from the market. Accused persons hurled bomb on him as a result whereof he sustained bomb injuries on his hand. He was referred to the local hospital and thereafter to the Patna Medical College Hospital where his ‘fardbeyan’ was recorded. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid case was lodged on 08.05.2004 whereas soon after the occurrence the local ‘chowkidar’ lodged a case ( annexure-2) of 2 the bail application registered under Sections 307, 120B of the Penal Code as also under diverse Sections of the Explosive Substance Act. In the said F.I.R. the ‘chowkidar’ has explained the circumstances under which the bomb carried by the petitioners and other exploded causing injury to the informant and others. Learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that the aforesaid case (Motipur P.S. Case no. 43 of 2004) has been found true in course of investigation and charge sheet has recently been submitted on 16.07.2009. A copy of the chrge sheet has been handed in by the learned counsel which is placed on record marked ‘X’. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is persuaded to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event or arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Motipur P.S. Case no. 51 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that in each case one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioners. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)