IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9278 of 2011 Tingan Das, S/O-Vishesar Das Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 25.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report with allegation that he along with other co-accused persons entered into the house of the informant and dragged her to a field where she was subjected to rape by first information report named accused Munna Das and after that petitioner also attempted to commit rape on her but victim raised alarm which attracted the villagers. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is delay of five days in lodging the first information report and when the victim was examined by the doctor she was found customed to sex. So, the aforesaid finding of the doctor clearly indicates this fact that the informant is a girl of easy virtue and, as a matter of fact co-accused Munna Das filed a complaint case bearing Complaint Case No. 1097 C of 2010 against the informant as well as her other family members and that is the reason the informant has brought this false case against the petitioner as well as other accused. Although, learned counsel tried to convince me about the innocence of the petitioner but I am not, at all, convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. It is a very serious case and, therefore, considering the nature of offence as well as allegation levelled against the petitioner, I do not feel it proper to 2 release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 96 of 2010 pending in the court of Sri Niraj Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Motihari, stands rejected. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)