( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1974 OF 2009 Shaikh Raju @ Mustafa s/o Shaikh Mehboob APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. M.A. Tandale, advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Patil, APP for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Salunke, advocate for the respondent No. 2. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 10th August, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Mr. Tandale has furnished copy to the advocate for the respondent No.2. The objection is, therefore, deemed as removed. 3. There is delay of 193 days in filing of the criminal appeal. The applicant submits that he is a poor person and suffered financial crunch. He was required to spend considerable time in collecting the amount of ( 2 ) the fine imposed by the Sessions Court and thereafter to obtain certified copies of the judgement. No reply seems to have been filed. The statement in the application (paragraph No.2) is, therefore, accepted. The delay appears to be unintentional. Consequently, the delay is condoned. The criminal application is allowed. 4. The criminal appeal is admitted. Mr. S.J. Salunke waives service for the respondent No.2. 5. The criminal revision applications filed alongwith the appeal to be heard alongwith the appeal if the learned advocate would move proper forum for such assignment alongwith the appeal. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/CRIAPLN1974-09