IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.910 of 2010 OM PRAKASH KUMAR Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3 4.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The original affidavit which is a format of annexure-1 has been filed by the Company. From a bare perusal of the said affidavit the Court is of the opinion that striking of paragraphs 1,2 and 3 is a deliberate mischief played at some level may by within the organization or by some one who had access to the record. Three paragraphs have been struck of in red ink and blue ink and this is not part and parcel of red ink stroking given by the Notary Public. Pen stroking of the ink at page one is totally different from page two. It seems that first a blue ink is used and then a red ink is used. If this is the only reason for non-consideration of the case of the petitioner then the Court wants to issue a direction upon the respondents to ignore this aspect of the matter because the petitioner cannot be made to suffer due to some mischief played against him may be after submission of the document for no fault of his. The objection raised through communication dated 10.12.2009 contained in annexure-2 stands quashed. Let the petitioner be called for interview. The original affidavit filed today is returned to learned counsel for the Company. This writ application stands allowed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)