^\or]^ l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No3^5 /2011 PETITIONER : ~7^ Ku. Veena Tiwari D/o Shri B.P.Tiwari Aged about 25 years, R/o. Tiwari Sadan, Subhash Ward, Mungeli. District Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^'^^^ f^s^> ^y VERSUS 1. / State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Departinent ^ of Panchyat and Social Welfare, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) <'>--' ^^ r/ •/^. ^^s ^' *-'• ^T^, ^tl^ 2.^ Collector, Korba, (C.G.) Distt.Korba 3. rBlock Education Officer, Pali, Distt.Korba (C.G.) ^^ Janpad Panchaya^t Pali, Through: Chief Executive Officer, Pali, Dist. Korba (C.G.) 5." Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, Near Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :@^- ^^%^ ^\\ Amit HIGILCQyR.TQFCHHATTISOARHATBILASPUR PETmQNER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 3475 of2011 Ku. Veena Tiwari. RESPONDENT8 VER8US State ofCUiattisgarh & Otfaers. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE226/227 OF THE CONSTmjnON OFINDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aiaiihotri, J. Present: Shri Shashank Iliakui?, Advocate forthe petiti<Mi@r. Shri N.N-Roy, Panel Lawyer for tfie State. OKDBRfORAL) (Passed on Ol81 day ofJuty, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appeari^ for Ifae petittoner s^bmits that fhis petition is identical to W.P.(8) No. 1520/2011 (Seema Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh <& Others) aiid ofher connected iimtters in which, a common order was passed by ttds Cowt on 29.04.2011 relatingto canceltotion ofappointment ofShifasha Kamii. 2. Leamed State counsel suhmits that tiie order dated 22.©2.2011has been modified and subs^}uent orders have been issued on 06.04.2011._ 3. Accordingly, fhis petition is ailowed in terms ofthe order dated 29.04.2011 passed by this Court in Seema Dubey v. State of Chhattisgarh <& Others and ofher comieeted matters. ,?M"'*10W ^•shss"'