(S> -^ -Q- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS'GARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.1164 OF2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Snrt. Neelu Yadav, W/o Shri Dhannu Yadav, aged about 26 years, Caste Ahir, R/o village Balrampur, Post Karva, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (CG). Versus 1. StateofChhattisgarh.throughSecretaty, Woman & Child Dw^lopment Department.oD.K.S Bhawan, Martralaya, Raipur(CG). 2. The CoUector, District Surguja (CG). 3. The Project Officer, Unified W<man & Chikl Development, Project Surajpur, DistrictSurguja(CG). 4. Janpad Rmchayat, Suraijpur, District Surguja (CG), through th®Chlef ExecuUve Officer. 5. Smt. Sita Rajwade, W/o Shri Ashok Kumar Rajwade, aged about 27 years, R/o vlllage Kilrampur, Pwt Karva, Tahsit Surajpur, District Surguja (CG). (Writ petition under Articte 226 oftheConstituUonOf India) Singte Bench: Hon'ble Shri SaUsh K. Agnihofri, J. Present:- Shrt /tehok Kumar Shukla^ counsel for the petittoner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt Advocate for the State. ORDER O (Passed on this 2ff" dajy ofFebruary, 2008) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for fte parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner questions the residential requiremen^lhe' respondent No5 and ftirther submi^s that the Janpad PanchayatiscompetenttoappoirtttieA^ the present case.the Project Ofiicer appointBd the Anganwaqli workere vwthoutJ'iawnganycompetence. | 3) Bethatasitmay, sinceitrequiresverificationoffaete,thematteris referred to the Collector, Surgiya, to look into the gnevancjes of the peBtfoner and pass appropriid®orders, in accordance wfth law. ' 4) Accordingly,thepetifionstandsdisposedof. 5) Consequently, I.A.No.1 atsostands dlsp<»edof.. Sd'- L.^nl ^^^ iboW