IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 15806 of 2008 Between: Smt. T. Jayamma W/o Late T. Jagadishwr Reddy R/o Nednoor Vilage, Kandukur mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND State of A.P., though its Mandal Revenue officer, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy district .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandmaus, declaring the inaction of the respondent in not mutating the name of the petitioner in the revenue records and issuing amended pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of the lands admeasuring Ac. 15.18 guntas in Sy. No. 525, Ac. 10.16 guntas in Sy. No. 526, Ac. 17.23 guntas in Sy. no. 527 and Ac. 13.20 guntas in Sy. No. 530 totally admeasuring Ac. 56.37 guntas situated in Nednoor Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to forthwith carry out the mutation in favour of the petitioner and her sons and daughter as per the registered will dt 12-3- 2008 and issue pattadar pass books and title deeds and pass such other order or roders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the inaction on the part of the respondent in mutating her name in the revenue records, in respect of the lands owned and possessed by her. It is stated that the husband of the petitioner purchased various extents of land, admeasuring Ac.56.37 guntas, in Nednoor Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under registered sale deeds, from one Sri Md.Osman, and that the same were being enjoyed by him, during his lifetime, by cultivation. It is stated that the husband of the petitioner died on 04-04-2008, and that during his lifetime, he executed a registered Will, dated 12-03-2008, in her favour. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has approached the respondent for mutation of her name in the revenue records, and that no action is taken thereon. Hence, the writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue has produced before this Court, a brief note submitted by the Tahasildar, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, wherein it is stated that after receiving application from the petitioner, through online, with regard to the succession of the property, they issued notice in Form VIII to the petitioner. Further, it is stated that the Village Revenue Oﬃcer of Nedunoor Village reported that the land in question has already been sold by the husband of the petitioner, and the application of the petitioner is disposed of by issuing a memo, dated 14.07.2008, against which, a case is also pending before the civil Court. Having regard to the fact that as the petitioner’s application for mutation of her name in the revenue records has already been disposed of by memo, dated 14-07-2008, and challenging the same, a case is pending before the civil Court, no relief can be granted to the petitioner, at this stage. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue her remedies before the civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Dated 23rd July, 2008 GJ