{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3789 OF 2009 Hemkant Dattatray Kulkarni & Another PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.P.Brahme, Advocate for petitioners Mr.N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent / State Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4 Mr.Girish Rane, Advocate for respondents NO.5 to 11 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 14th September 2009 PER COURT: 1. After arguing for some time, Mr.Brahme, learned counsel for the petitioners, states on instructions that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to submit a representation to the respondent Education Officer, questioning the approval granted to respondents No.5 to 11. 2. We accordingly dismiss this petition this petition, as {2} withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. We, however, clarify that the Education Officer should decide the said representation, if submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the fact that we have granted liberty to the petitioners to submit the said representation. In the circumstances there will be no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/wp3789-09