IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- RFA No. 2933 of 1999 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.03.2008 Jeewandhar Jain and another ...Appellants Versus The Land Acquisition Collector and others ...Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Nirmal Yadav -.- Present : Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for the Appellant Mr. Siddharth Batra, A. A.G. Haryana for the respondent-State -.- Nirmal Yadav, J. (Oral) The appellants have filed civil miscellaneous No. 3270 CI of 2007 with a prayer to dispose of the main appeal in terms of the judgment reported as 2000(1) RLR, 295 titled as 'Atma Parkash and Others Vs. State of Haryana', which has further been upheld by the Letters Patent Bench of this Court in LPA No. 394 of 2000 titled as 'Neeraj Kumar Vs. Haryana State and others', decided on 30.01.2001. Learned counsel for the appellants has stated at the Bar that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Letters Patent Bench in Neeraj Kumar's case (supra), which has further been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Appeal (civil) No. 3262-3270 of 2002 titled as 'Raj Kumar and Others Vs. Haryana State and Ors.', decided on 27.08.2007, wherein, it was held that the compensation awarded by the High Court was just and fair. RFA No. 2933 of 1999 (O&M) -2- After going through the aforesaid judgments, which are placed on record today, it is evident that this case is squarely covered by the above referred judgments. Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous application No. 3270 CI of 2007 is allowed and the main appeal is disposed of in terms of the decision rendered in Atam Parkash's case (supra). (Nirmal Yadav) Judge March 05, 2008 mohan