IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 155 OF 2004 MR. JOSE DAMACIAN SOUZA NOBBAY AND 2 ORS., ... Appellants Versus SHRI GOPAL ALIAS BABLO SADGURU SATARDEKAR & ANR., ... Respondents Ms. G. Xettigar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D. Shirodkar, holding for Mr. Sardessai, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 22nd July, 2011 P.C. Heard Ms. G. Xettigar, learned Advocate for the appellants and Mr. D. Shirodkar, holding for Mr. Sardessai, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. The consent terms duly signed by the appellants and the respondents as well as by their respective Advocates along with plan are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification purpose. 3. Learned Counsel for the parties state that the appeal be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the parties, who are identified by their respective Advocates, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Consequently, the decrees passed by both the Courts below, stand modified accordingly. Decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms filed. 4. Second Appeal No.155/2004 stands disposed of with no order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA