IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50089 of 2008 DILIP SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard Jitendra Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K.Jha, learned A.P.P. The case of the petitioner was committed to the court of sessions in the month of July, 1997. The petitioner did not appear in the court of sessions forcing that court to separate the trial and it is not denied that other accused have been acquitted on trial. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of being in custody since 5.6.2008, only three witnesses have been examined and the pace of the trial is too slow to be appreciated. The Court appreciates the pace of the trial with its view in the background that it could not be the only case in which the accused could be in the custody before the F.T.C.-IV, Munger. There could be many such cases. After all the petitioner could blame himself for the plight he finds himself. The petition is dismissed. The court could take its own time in disposing of the trial. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )