IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No. 886 of 2006 Date of Decision: 17.11.2008. Chander Singh ....Appellant Versus Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Jind and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Rajesh Sethi and Mr.Sachin Gupta, Advocates for respondents. RAJESH BINDAL, J. **** The only argument raised by learned counsel for the appellant in the present appeal is that the respondents are taking steps to arrest the appellant for the recovery of loan taken by him without firstly taking recourse to sell the property which was mortgaged with the respondents to secure loan. Learned counsel for respondents very fairly submits that respondents shall firstly sell the property mortgaged with the bank for the purpose of recovery of loan due from the appellant and thereafter take further steps in accordance with the provisions of Haryana Co- operative Societies, Act, 1982. In view of this submission, the grievance made by the appellant does not survive. Accordingly the appeal is disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 17.11.2008. JUDGE Reema