IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 21453 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 25.08.2011 Pawan ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. On July 19, 2011, while issuing notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation in the FIR pertaining to offence allegedly committed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 are totally vague. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. It has not been specifically mentioned in the complaint made to the Police as to what kind of words were allegedly used and whether it was at a public place and further that the accused knew that the other party is belonging to the scheduled caste or scheduled tribe com- munities.” Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Dharambir, submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial inter- rogation is not required. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the peti- tioner on July 19, 2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 25.08.2011 sharmila