1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 4892/2009 (Chhabildas M. Lathiya ..vs.. Dr. Satischandra S. Laddha and another) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or Directions Court's or Judge's Orders. And Registrar's Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI DATED : NOVEMBER 16, 2009 Heard Learned Advocate Shri V.M.Deshpande for petitioner-defendant. The defendant wanted that the plaintiff should first disclose names of his witnesses and then he should be called upon to conduct cross-examination. Reliance is placed upon provisions of Order 16 rule 1 & 3 in support of those contentions. It is apparent that law does not compel the plaintiff to file any list of witnesses and apprehension and anxiety of respondent can be taken care of appropriately in the matter. No case is, therefore, made out warranting interference in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale 2