IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc.No. 25125 of 2009 Bimal Kumar Sharma @ Bimal Kumar Versus The State of Bihar ------------ 5 25.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The informant may not be allowed to mis- use the privilege given to helpless ladies. Her grievance is that she is not getting share in property earned by her father-in-law for which she is not entitled. Marriage is of the year 1980. Her maintenance along with her son never can be extended for refusal of anticipatory bail and that is limited to only husband, this petitioner. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Katihar Sahayak P.S. Case No. 46 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)