- 1 - rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.24 OF 2008 in SECOND APPEAL NO.440 OF 2008 Shri Digambar Raghunath Pujare @ Kamble & ors ... Petitioners vs Shri Dipak Premanand Kambli ... Respondent Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude i.b.Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for Petitioners Mr.N.N.Gawankar a/w Mr.Irfan Sait for Respondent .. CORAM: R.V.MORE, J DATED: August 7, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is filed for review of the order dated 30th September, 2008 passed in Second Appeal No.440 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to clause 4 of the operative part of the impugned order and submitted that the sketch as referred to in the said clause is not attached to the plaint and therefore the impugned order cannot be executed. 3. By an order dated 30th September, 2008 the above Second Appeal came to be dismissed as no substantial question of law was involved. The petitioner is always - 2 - at liberty to take objection that the sketch is not attached to the plaint, in execution of the impugned judgment and decree. However, in my view, no ground is made out to review the order under section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. R.V.More, J - 3 -