IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.4734 OF 2008 ANITA RAI, WIFE OF OM PRAKASH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANAINI, POST OFFICE LAHRI TIWARIDIH, POLICE STATION PIRO, DISTRICT BHOJPUR AT ARA ……………………………………………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 2. THE COMMISSIONER, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHOJPUR AT ARA 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, PIRO, BHOJPUR 5. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT BHADSAR, PIRO, BHOJPUR 6. JAYANTI DEVI, WIF OF DAYANAND RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JASIDIH, POLICE STATION PIRO, DISTRICT BHOJPUR AT ARA ………………………………………………………………………..RESPONDENTS ********* 2 22/04/2011 The petitioner would be at liberty to file an application before the District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara if she has any grievances with respect to the appointment of respondent no. 6, namely, Jayanti Devi. If such an application is filed before the District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara with respect to the appointment etc. of Aanganbari Sevika or Sahayika, then the District Magistrate will call for the records and examine them, and if in case it is found that the allegation are prima facie correct, then notices should be issued to the parties concerned and after hearing them, an appropriate orders may be passed. In case, the District Magistrate finds that the allegations are frivolous, then an order should be passed by the District Magistrate dismissing the complaint. 2 This writ application is not maintainable at this stage, and as such it is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )