1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. (appr) 147 OF 2010, 148 of 2010 and 149 of 2010 in Criminal Revision No. 149/07, 148/07 and 147 of 2007 Abdul Khalik s/o Abdul Sattar Qureshi v. The State of Mah. & anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.V. Muley Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.M. Kale, APP, for Res. no.1. Mrs. Jaiswal Advocate for Res. no.2. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 21 st JUNE, _2010. There is no provision for reviewing the judgment rendered in criminal revision. Hence, all the review applications are rejected. C.A. Nos. 599/10, 602/10 & 603/10 These are the applications for grant of time to surrender. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the application on the ground that the applicant has bought sufficient time and therefore this Court should not extend the time to surrender. 2 Having heard learned counsel for rival parties, I find that number of years have passed that the applicant is free and looking to the sentence awarded, I am inclined to allow these applications in terms of their prayer clause. All the Criminal applications are allowed in terms of their prayer clause. JUDGE /TA/