HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR WRIT APPEAL No.999 of 2002 Dated: 31-01-2011 Between: Motor Vehicles & Drivers Conveyance Union, Regd. No.A/879/91, Zaheerabad, Medak District, rep. by its Vice-President & Another. …Appellant AND The District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy, & Others. Respondents. This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR WRIT APPEAL No.999 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This Writ Appeal is directed against the orders of the learned single Judge, dated 25.04.2002 made in W.P.No.8214 of 2002, whereby the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner was disposed of directing that the possession of the petitioners’ members except in relation to land which was assigned to others by proceedings, dated 5.5.1987 has to be protected. The grievance of the appellants-writ petitioners in moving this Court is the letter, dated 31.7.2010 addressed by the third respondent herein to the Station House Officer, Zahirabad Police Station for taking necessary action as per the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.12304 of 2000, dated 27.3.2001, wherein it was stated that as per the orders of this Court in the said writ petition filed by the first petitioner, the Senior Civil Judge at Sangareddy declined to extend the status quo order and therefore, requested the Station House Officer to take necessary action and safeguard the properties of Bagareddynagar Colony. Pending the writ appeal, this Court directed the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy to dispose of I.A.No.419 of 2001 in O.S.No.33 of 2001 within six weeks from the date of the order i.e. 26.6.2002. The writ petition itself was filed challenging the said letter despite the matter being subjudice in O.S.No.33 of 2001 in which, the Mandal Revenue Officer is also a party. The petitioners have already filed revision in C.R.P.No.3179 of 2001 against the orders passed in I.A.No.419 of 2001 in O.S.No.33 of 2001 wherein, the suit filed by the petitioners and others was directed to be disposed of expeditiously and decide I.A.No.419 of 2001 in the said suit. Thus the petitioners have already invoked the jurisdiction of the civil Court to safeguard their interest. In all probability, the suit, which is of 2001, might have already been disposed of by this time. No cause survives in the writ appeal. However, the appellants-petitioners are at liberty to avail the remedies available to them. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. ________________ N.RAVI SHANKAR, J. JANUARY 31, 2011 Tsr