CW 8248/07 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.8248/2007 Ugrasen Versus Prakash Chand & Ors. Date of Order ::: 22/07/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Mohit Gupta, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed by defendant (tenant) assailing orders dt.28/03/06 (Ann.3) whereby application filed by plaintiff (landlord) seeking revision of rent U/s 6 of Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (“Rent Act”) was allowed but the appeal filed by defendant was rejected by appellate Tribunal vide order dt.19/06/07 (Ann.4). Counsel is not questioning revision of rent on merits having been extensively examined by both the Rent Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal U/s 6 of the Rent Act but only submits that power of attorney having been submitted before the Tribunal in favour of Dr.Sudhir Bhargava was executed at one point of time at Jaipur and simultaneously at Nagpur on 16/04/05, which is practically not possible but this grievance has not been considered by both the Tribunals. In the opinion of this Court, aforesaid submission is bereft of merit. This Court has CW 8248/07 //2// to examine the procedure adopted by Tribunal U/s 6 of Rent Act, for which it was not a material question for consideration as to who has executed power of attorney and in whose favour. This Court does not find justification to entertain instant petition on the assertions made (supra) which may call for interference in the orders impugned. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 8248CW07-Jul22-Ds.doc