IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 22856 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 09.12.2011 Umed Singh .... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. R.K. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Petitioner Umed Singh, who claims himself to be an oustee, has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to the respondents to consider his claim for allotment of a plot under the oustees policy dated 18.3.1992 (Annexure P-4) and the subsequent amended policy framed by the Haryana Urban Development Authority. It is the case of the petitioner that his 22 Kanals 3 Marlas of land was acquired for development of residential Sector 14, Gurgaon, from 1972 to 1987 and till date, his claim for allotment of a plot under the oustees policy has not been considered. In this regard, the petitioner has served a CWP No. 22856 of 2011 -2- legal notice dated 19.9.2011, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-13. It is the case of the petitioner that till date, the respondents have not taken any decision on the said legal notice. In view of the above, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the Administrator, HUDA, Gurgaon (respondent No.3 herein) to consider the said legal notice dated 19.9.2011 (Annexure P-13) in accordance with law and oustees policy of the HUDA and take a decision by passing a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE December 09, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE