IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1807 of 2009 KANCHAN PRASAD & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner:- Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, A,C. to G.P. 15 --- 2. 21.4.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the interim order to maintain status quo was being violated by the opposite parties. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party Nos.4 to 8, it is stated that on receipt of communication on 28.5.2009 the construction work was stopped on 29.5.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the fax message sent by the State Counsel was duly received by the respondent-authorities, but in spite of that as many as 31 pillars have been erected. Be that as it may, considering the show cause and the further fact which even learned counsel for the petitioners admits that after 29.5.2009 no further construction work is going on, this Court does not consider it a fit case to proceed further in the matter. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )