RFA No.2621 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2621 of 2007. Decided on: September 07, 2009. Smt.Kamla Sharma .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.R.S.Hooda, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Addl.A.G., Haryana, for the respondents. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The land of the petitioner was acquired vide Notification dated 16.03.1999, under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short 'The Act'), which was followed by another Notification under Section 6 of the Act, for public purpose, namely, for development and utilization of land as Residential, Commercial, Institutional and recreational purposes, in Sectors 1, 2, 3, 5-B, 5-C, and 6 of Panchkula Extension (M.D.C.), Mansa Devi Complex, in Urban Estate, Panchkula, under the Haryana Urban Development . . . 1 RFA No.2621 of 2007 Authority Act, 1977. As the market value assessed by the Collector for each kinds of land was not acceptable to the land owners, a reference was made to the District Court for determination of market value on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Act. The reference Court determined the market value at the flat rate of Rs.418/- per square yard, at the time of Notification dated 16.03.1999. As the land acquired as per Notification was 482.17 acres, village Saketri, Hadbast No.376, Tehsil and District Panchkula, a large number of claimants had filed regular first appeals. The State of Haryana, as well as HUDA had also filed appeals aggrieved by the assessment of the market value. The bunch of 804 appeals was taken up in RFA No.3008 of 2008 in case Smt.Poonam Vs. State of Haryana. For the detailed reasons given in the judgment dated 25.02.2009, a Coordinate Bench of this Court remitted the case back to the reference Court for redetermination of the market value. Counsel for the petitioner and State counsel inform that the subject matter is still pending before the Additional District Judge, Panchkula. In view of the said background, the judicial propriety demands that this appeal should not be decided as a solitary case separated from the connected case arising out of the same Notification lest it should prejudice the rights of the parties in the matter which is pending before the reference Court. The case of the . . . 2 RFA No.2621 of 2007 petitioner is admittedly at par with RFA No.3008 of 2006. Following the judgment in RFA No.3008 of 2006, decided on 25.02.2009, the appeal is remitted back for adjudication by the reference Court. The petitioners case will be decided along with the matter of other land owners whose case has been remanded vide order dated 25.02.2009, in RFA No.3008 of 2008. The appeal is disposed of in the similar terms as RFA No.3008 of 2008. Parties are directed to appear before the trial Court on 19.09.2009. The lower Court will take up the case along with other reference cases which are stated to be fixed for 24.09.2009, at Panchkula. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE September 07, 2009. rka . . . 3