1 wp4745.08 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4745 OF 2008 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri R.V. Niknavare, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Shri S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent nos. 6 to 8. Shri A.N. Irpatgire, Advocate for respondent no.12. Shri Vivek Dhage, Advocate for respondent nos. 16 and 19. Shri A.V. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.23. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 22nd July, 2011. . The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are the members of the respondent no.6-Co-operative Bank, whereas, the petitioner no.3 is an employee on the Bank. The petitioners have sought directions against the respondent nos. 1 to 4 to take action against the respondent no.6-Bank in accordance with the provisions of the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 and the provisions of Section 35 of the Banking Regulation Act as well as the provisions of the Reserve Bank of 2 wp4745.08 India Act. 2. We have been informed that the representations were made by the petitioners on 2nd March, 2005, 5th November, 2007, 6th December, 2007 and 24th January, 2008. However, the representations have not been decided as yet by the Central Registrar, Multi State Co-operative Societies of Union of India. 3. In our opinion, the Petition can be conveniently disposed of, by directing the Central Registrar to decide the representations of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today. While doing so, the Central Registrar will also consider whether such representations can be entertained by the Registrar. We have not considered the merit of the petitioners' contentions, which have been raised in the Petition as the Central Registrar will consider the representations preferred by the petitioners, fully. 4. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/wp4745.08