IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 17809 of 2010(A) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ ANADAVALLY K.R., AGED 67 YEARS,W/O.LATE KUTTAPPAN, THAZHAYIL HOUSE, VELLIYAMPARA, KELAKOM,KANNUR-670674. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN SRI.B.R.VIJAYABABU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNUR. 2. THE C.I.OF POLICE,KELAKOM POLICE STATION KANNUR. 3. THE S.I.OF POLCIE,KELAKOM POLICE STATION KANNUR. 4. ANTONY,A.S.I. KELAKOM POLICE STATION, KANNUR. 5. PURAUSHOTHAN NEDUMPARAMBIL, NEDUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, KELAKOM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. JAYESH, S/O,PURUSHOTHAMAN, NEDUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, KELAKOM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 7. PENNAMMA, W/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, NEDUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, KELAKOM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. WP(C).No. 17809 of 2010(A) -2- 8. BENNY,PALLAT HOUSE, KELAKOM AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 9. NEDUMBURAM THAMPAN, S/O.KUMARAN, KELAKOM AMSOM, DESOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. ADV. SMT.I.S.LAILA FOR R5 TO R7 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 17809 of 2010(A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION GIVEN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 27/09/2006 ISSUED BY THE WOMEN'S COMMISSION TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE WOMEN'S COMMISSION DATED 06/09/2008. EXT.P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5:- TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD FOR RECEIPT OF EXT.P4. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.17809 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Petitioner, a lady seeks in this Writ Petition, protection for her own life. This Court never become inclined to grant any interim order of police protection. According to the counsel for the respondents, the issue raised in this Writ Petition is stale and there is no necessity for protection. We are not inclined to issue the directions sought for. We dispose of the Writ Petition without granting the protection sought for. However, we make it clear that in case any fresh cause of action arises it will be open to the petitioner to approach the police first and then this Court if the police does not take any action. If no enquiry is conducted in Ext.P2 so far, enquiry will be conducted with notice to the party respondents and appropriate action as is warranted by the findings in the enquiry will be taken. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/- -2-