WP(C) 905/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. H. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. H.M. Phukan, learn ed State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Mr. A. Matin, learn ed counsel appearing for the respondent No.6. The petitioners, by the present petition, are praying for a direction to the res pondent authorities to extend the benefit under the Indira Abas Yojona (IAY) con tending inter alia that though their names appear in the permanent BPL wait list of Nayasatra Beghekhaiti Gaon Panchayat under Tapattay Development Block, such benefits have not been extended to them. A further prayer has also been made fo r setting aside the selection of beneficiaries made by the respondent authoritie s in the years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010. The petitioners in support of their contention relating to their selection have annexed a document as Annexure-2 claiming the same to be the permanent wait list , where their names appear. The photocopy of the said document, the typed copy of which is annexed as Annexure-2, reveals that the same is not the list prepare d by the authority and in fact the list of persons, who proposed to file the wri t petition, which is evident from the last sentence at page 20. The said docume nt also does not bear the signature of any authority preparing the said list. Th e petitioners have converted the said document as the permanent wait list prepar ed by the authority and are claiming the benefit on the basis of such document. The petitioners have tried to mislead this Court. Hence, the said prayer of th e petitioner cannot be granted. Relating to the second prayer seeking setting aside of the select list prepared by the authority pertaining to the years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, the said praye r also cannot be granted, as the beneficiaries selected by the authority and who se names appear in such lists have not been arrayed as party respondents. That being the position, the writ petition is devoid of any merit and hence dism issed.