IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-3560 of 2011 Date of Decision:3.3.2011 Darshpreet Kaur .... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 alongwith the statement of the petitioner as well as the affidavits of respondents No.4 to 6. Respondents No.4 to 6 have submitted in their affidavits (R-2 to R-4) that they never misbehaved with the petitioner and will not in future. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that respondents No.4 to 6 shall be bound by the aforesaid affidavits and shall not harass the petitioner in any manner. However, in case, the petitioner still have any fear, she is at liberty to approach the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police, who shall look into the same and take appropriate measures, if need be, in accordance with law. This order shall not have any bearing on the factum of marriage. 3.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE