1 CAG-3959.05 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3959 OF 2005 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3960 OF 2005 M.V. Henry .... Applicant Vs. H.D. Morjaria & Anr. .... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4887 OF 2005 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4888 OF 2005 M.V. Henry .... Applicant Vs. K.V. Satyanarayana & Anr. .... Respondents Shri S.K. Shinde for the Applicant-NCB in all Applications. Ms G.P. Mulekar, APP, for the State in CA-Nos.3959 & 3960 of 2005. Ms P.P. Shinde, APP, for the State in CA-Nos.4887 & 4888 of 2005. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: AUGUST 31, 2010 P.C: By these applications the Narcotics Control Bureau seeks cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.1 by the learned 2 CAG-3959.05 Judge, Special Court for Greater Bombay on 12-4-2005. The learned Judge held that rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not attracted to the contraband substance dealt with under Section 9A of the NDPS Act. Now this position has been re-stated by this Court in Rafael Palafox Garcia v. Union of India & Anr., reported in 2009 Cri.L.J. 446. The contraband articles seized from respondent No.1 are ephedrine tablets. In view of this, it cannot be said that the learned Judge erred in granting bail to respondent No.1. The applications are therefore rejected. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)