ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 1377 OF APPEAL NO. 1377 OF APPEAL NO. 1377 OF 1988 1988 1988 The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant. Vs. Dr.Arvind Damodar Dode ...Respondent. Ms.G.P.Mulekar for the Appellant-State. None for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 10th April, 2008 : 10th April, 2008 : 10th April, 2008 ORAL ORAL ORAL JUDGMENT:- JUDGMENT:- JUDGMENT:- . This is a state Appeal whereby restricted challenge is made to grant additional compensation of 12% p.a. vide its Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act from 4th February, 1970 till 26th November, 1980. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant fairly considered and restricted the matter in view of a Supreme Court Judgement Kashiben Bhikabai & Ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Kashiben Bhikabai & Ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Kashiben Bhikabai & Ors. Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer, (2002) 2, Supreme Court Cases 605 Officer, (2002) 2, Supreme Court Cases 605 Officer, (2002) 2, Supreme Court Cases 605. 2. The award was passed prior to 1982. 3. In view of this, the present Appeal is partly allowed. The grant of 12% Additional Compensation as referred above is quashed and set aside. Rests of the order is maintained subject to consequences of setting aside the additional compensation of 12% as referred. 4. No costs. ( 2 ) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)