¥IGNI 30 BOIiSniEU.SH CD SiSo^szTszssSioMwa^mFNoiiiSa^aim ^~" r.'Tal'andse-rirs 'ATa 'S'S ( TB^^USO ) aa<j •-ig *3ndse"[Tg 'ft's 'S'S 'XQB^vt'e'N leuo-tSTATa TeuoTq.Tpp^ sq^ (•v-3) •a-idss-[T:a 'S.T.'a 's's Tocqos'S'S'H'H 'TedTOUT-td 3q,E ('.<<>.5l •andsei-tg 'S.T-a *g's '.isoT330 T3uuosj3t3 Teaoi:sT:A-i:a 'as •t- •£ •z sasaa& •( O 0 ) 3nds°TTa s wsja .mdseiTg 'TOGtlos'S'S'H'N -^Ta'S'S 'aspT'siacqs e se fia'?^toa '-p^^es 30-i:j3:o ^scy 'T^ipS ~ afieTTTA 3:0 ^uap-s-sax 'sseaS. 75 ^npqe pgfie 'euuespnqSTA 'lilBTaqa •E;tqs S^BT 30 aos 'p-ss-exg 'vs^tey. ...- ^'^ ^^oS-a®^ aS® ai& ......<€^ay«l"i" ..K^':.^^' ^^^' SLSsmoassa gst-ioisijiga'' 'OH NOI^EEa' Jiiyri •SB.SSfTia uV HWfSSIM.WIHO 30 .Egp-OS HOIH SHS m (^~) <-Zy S-HC-22 311^1 TT R-ti.<* 3igg ^4 ^ri^T -s^ '3^ ^wwf, 9Ttiy'is, wwi'yy ..^^...ISJ.jt.l. sn^fi's^ann ^if^r 'qTOferitTlIPRff •? fei^TNt$K ^?3i|S(p:s3ff^r Shri V. K- Pandey, coijiasel for tbe petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, coujisel for the respondents. Heard. Though this writ peti|ion is listed for adiuission, ui view of the tmaited nature of ttie pray^r made, which is for a direction to fhe authorities to consider i^is representation against his transfer contained in Atuiexure P-; 11.03.2003 (Anncxurc P-1) , no useful purpose would be served in keepnig thls writ petitlon pendtng, accordirigly on the prayer of tlie learaed counsel forfhe panjies itis betng disposed ofat (his stage. Thc cliaUcngc in tl^is writ petition is to tlic oidcr-dated whcreby thc pctitioiicr who is nrorking as Chowkidar ia MMSS/ EM Sjchool, Bilaspur (of the railways) has been tisiisferred to Shahdol (M.f.j. According to the petitioner, since fhe order of traasfer is inoti+ated because of the aniiovance of the Priiicipal of the school it is liable to be quasbed. Hozvever, these are contentions which under 1jhe facts aad circuinstances fhe Court ig not iacliiied to go nito at fbis stage in view of fhe prayer of fhe petitioner that his represeijtation inay be directed to be disposed of. ^^-ni»--. ^a '*inmti, 'S^PTS, wwwy. an^i^r f?:ri??siit?i ^•R((^ y^ti sn^i TRiWfftif Accordingly this Tvrit petitic authonties to dispose of fhe order of ta-ansfer contained in OtL With thc aforcsaid ob; pctition staiids disposcd of. Certified copy as per rule^ *|tfffl41^ 'qPRS 4 fSiAt&lt^K ^i'3?figi[3n^i, : is disposed of by directuag the Jietitioner s representation ^ainst his |Axuiexure P-5 wifhiii a period of four weeks from fhe date of couunu^iication / receipt of the order aud, ia the meaatnne if the petitioner [has not been relieved he shaU. not be relieved. It is inade clear tfaat thi^ Court is not expressiag any opiaion on the merits of fhe petfitioner's contention and that the representation is to be conside^-ed aad decided by the authonties on its own merits. cryations and ducctions, this writ Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge