CWP(T) No. 14384 of 2008 20.10.2011 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents. The petitioner claims the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. This issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with the representation and a copy of the writ petition as well as a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 20, 2011 (PK)