1 (Crim Appl 237 of 2010 in W.P. 3233 of 2009) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3233 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ...Petitioner Vs. Prataprao @ Mahesh Baban Bhosale and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.Ravi Kadam-AG with Mr.P.A.Pol-PP and Mr. S.R. Shinde -APP for the State Mr.A.V. Anturkar, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr. Dilip Bodake for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Sanjeev P. Kadam for Respondent Nos.3,4 and 5 Mr.V.V. Purwant for Respondent Nos.7 and 9 Mr.Siddheshwar Kale i/b. Mrs. Savita M. Yadav for Respondent Nos.6,10 and 11. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 20TH SPETEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. For the reasons separately recorded, writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Liberty, however, is granted to the Petitioner to take out an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. (V.M. KANADE J.) 2 (Crim Appl 237 of 2010 in W.P. 3233 of 2009) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.237 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3233 OF 2009 Dinkar Tukaram Pawar ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra of Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.Ravi Kadam-AG with Mr.P.A.Pol-PP and Mr. S.R. Shinde -APP for the State Mr.A.V. Anturkar, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr. Dilip Bodake for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Sanjeev P. Kadam for Respondent Nos.3,4 and 5 Mr.V.V. Purwant for Respondent Nos.7 and 9 Mr.Siddheshwar Kale i/b. Mrs. Savita M. Yadav for Respondent Nos.6,10 and 11. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 20TH SPETEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 14(a). The remarks made by the Sessions Court against the public prosecutor in paragraphs 76 and 77 of the order dated 24.11.2009 are expunged (V.M. KANADE J.)