IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21425 of 2009 MRITUNJAY KUMAR @ MRITUNJAY KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 19.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 395, 397, 365, 412 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R. the truck loaded with rice etc. were looted at gun point. The F.I.R. is against unknown. Learned counsel submits that the name of the petitioner transpired in the present case on the alleged confessional statement of co-accused Saroj Singh and Manas Singh. It is contended that there is no recovery of the looted articles from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel handed in an order dated 17.1.2008 passed in batch of Cr. Misc. applications whereby similarly placed co-accused have been granted bail. The said order is on record marked ‘Y’. It appears that petitioner is in custody since 7.2.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar (Aurangabad) in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2007, subject to condition that one of the bailors should be the own/close family members of the petitioner. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)