Crl.revision No.2789 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Rev.No.2789 of 2010 Date of decision: 16.5.2011 Satish Kumar ... Petitioner versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH. Present: Mr.Jasleen Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.I.P.S.Kohli, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ... JORA SINGH, J. Satish Kumar preferred this revision to challenge the order dated 16.9.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Patiala. By the said judgment, appeal against the judgment and order dated 13.2.2008 by JMIC, Samana, in Complaint No.190 dated 12.12.2006 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed. As per order dated 13.2.2008 by JMIC, Samana, petitioner was directed to undergo RI for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for two months. As per order dated 16.9.2010 by Additional Sessions Judge, petitioner was ordered to be released on probation. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that parties have effected compromise and this fact is clear from the affidavit of Swaran Singh, respondent-complainant (Annexure P-1) on the file. In view of affidavit (Annexure P-1), revision be disposed of. Learned counsel for respondent-complainant argued that Crl.revision No.2789 of 2010 2 affidavit of Swaran Singh (Annexure P-1) is correct one. Parties have effected compromise. Cheque amount with interest has been received by the respondent-complainant. In the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the trial Court. Against the judgment and order of trial Court, appeal was preferred, but in appeal, petitioner was directed to be released on probation. Now the parties have effected compromise. Cheque amount with interest has been received by the respondent-complainant. Nothing is due from the petitioner. In view of compromise, revision stands disposed of. 16.5.2011 ( JORA SINGH ) pk JUDGE