•ToEf ^||<L||<r|^ ^Tll^Ko, f;Q|<ni^^< W*1CTI <1»*<|C|» "^200 ^?T T^F (<i?(sq<^) ^l^T^RT^i^ ^CT 3?1^ff sb*licft i^HW^ft^^H^T Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendlra Vishra. J ^.C.C.NOl4400F2007 Apoiicant Petitioner Non- Versus 1. Apolicants/ 2. 3. 4. Rajiv L^ Distt. R^i Througil Ambiikaj about Raipur« 8|3 Railn Shri Shiv Dal/al Distt.Ralil: Shri Pa[ Bhukharl (CG) 4tn Civii (CG) Djstrict 4 27.4.2009 Shri Manoj Kumar Dubey, Iearr|ed Shri LC Das, learned counself4>r summons on respondents No. 3 & 4. Taking into consideration that| parties, the defauit, as pointed out by Aiso heard on 1A No.01,, applic^tion petition as the same has been preferr^c notedated 15.10.2007. Qbl^id^l^ 'RT1^* ^ ft^ <p3i^5< ^sffiTH^T^T ichan Mandir Trust Committee, Rajim ipur (CG) itsVice President, Shri Narayan Rao, , S/o Shri Panchhi Ram Ambilkar, aged years, R/o Gol Bazar, Raipur, Distt. ^G) Singh, aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Singh Kshtriya, R/o Rajim, Tahsi! & pur (CG) ^an, aged about 33 years, S/o Shri Singh, R/o Rajim. Tahsii & Distt. Raipur Judge, Class-li, Raipur, Distt. Raipur |udge, Rajpur, District Raipur (CG) ABElication for restoraKon of W.P.No2322 of1995 counse! for the applicant. respondents No. 1 & 2. The matter is listed on default|for not paying process fee for service of respondents No. 3 & 4 are pi-o forma fhe office, is condoned. for condonation of delay in fiiing this ^d with a delay of 667 days, as per office ^W^ ^^^"110^ il^-lt^lk—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. •^^-?-' 's^ ^ww^, yixii-H^Ko, fsi<ni<-i^< *11*1Crll <(»*1|Cft ••^200 ^n^i T^3K (yif^<^) ^TT^I ^T ^i<^ WT 3?T^fT9n*iw ?^ITW^feT3?T^T For the reasons indicated i supported by affidavit of Shri Ani! Ki iearned counse! for the contesting r| objection in allowing this app!jcatior| Deiay in filing this petition is condone^ The appiicant has fiied the ins| No.2322/1995, which was dismissed for want of prosecutlon. Taking into consideration th^ restoration of the writ petition, whi^ applicant Shri Anjl Kumar Tiwari, an(j to its restoration, the petition is allc^ cfii^E<yt4^ 'WT^f ^ t^Tst <Rn^8< ^3TRm?n^r i the said application, which is ajso imar Singh, and further considering ^iat sspondents No. 1 & 2 do not have^any , tfie application (IA,No.01) is a!iowed. ant petition for restoration of writ petition yy this Court vide order dated,17.11.2005 reasons assigned in the petition for h is aiso supported by -affideiyit of the that the respondents have no oi^ection ^ved. The writ petltion is restor^ed to its original number, subject to applicar^t's depositing cost of Rs.200/-with tiie Secretary, Chhattisgarh High Coui^ Legal Aid Committee, Biiasj&UF^and furni'shing receipt thereof. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge