IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2639 of 2008 Between: K. Subuddi, Proddatur, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Pulivendla Police Station, Kadapa District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to For the reasons stated in the "Telegram" dated 06-02-2008 sent by the Petitioner herein, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the Petitioner's son namely, Sudhakar, before this Hon'ble Court, who is illegally detained since 03-02-2008 by the police, Pulivendla Police Station, Kadapa District and apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri B. Prakash Rao, J) This case is a taken up one in pursuance of telegram dated 6-2- 2008 sent by the petitioner alleging that his son viz., Sudhakar was illegally detained by the 1st respondent since 3-2-2008 and he apprehends danger to his life in the hands of the police. After notice and in reply thereto, in the counter affidavit sworn to by Sri A. Ananda Rao, Sub-Inspector of Police, Pulivendula Police Station, it is stated that the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Proddatur after conducting thorough investigation recorded the statement of the alleged detenue on 14-2-2008, wherein he stated that he was never detained by the police. Further, it is also the case of the respondents that the alleged detenu is not required in any case and that he is moving freely. In view of the same, we do not find any merit in the writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. B. PRAKASH RAO, J L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 25-02-2008 ks ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Station House Officer, Pulivendla Police Station, Kadapa District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District. 3 Two CCs to the Advocate General (OUT). 4 Two CD copies.