THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1614 OF 2010 Dt.9.12.2011 Between: Yerra Ramesh … Petitioner And Yerra Usha Rani … Respondent … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1614 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri T. Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Jayanti S.C. Sekhar, learned counsel for the respondent. This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dt.27.1.2010 passed by the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, allowing I.A. No.687 of 2009 filed by the respondent – wife in O.P. No.44 of 2009, a petition filed by the revision petitioner seeking dissolution of the marriage between the parties. The respondent filed I.A. No.687 of 2009 under Section 13 of the Family Courts Act read with Rule 9 of the Family Court Rules seeking interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month to herself and Rs.3,000/- per month to a male child born out of the wedlock between the parties and Rs.10,000/- towards legal expenses. Though the respondent could not marshal any evidence as to the means of the revision petitioner before the Court below in support of her claim that the revision petitioner is working in Naval Dockyard and getting a salary of Rs.30,000/- per month; the revision petitioner himself produced before the Court below Ex.R.1, which is the salary certificate, disclosing that after paying Rs.80,000/- towards G.P.F., Rs.30,000/- towards CCEIS, the net salary received by the revision petitioner was Rs.18,258/- per month. On the basis of this material, the Court below awarded Rs.5,000/- towards legal expenses, and as interim maintenance awarded Rs.5,000/- per month to wife and Rs.1,000/- per month to the son, in all Rs.6,000/- per month, from the date of filing of the petition. The revision petitioner was directed to pay arrears of interim maintenance on or before 11.2.2010 and further directed to pay monthly interim maintenance on or before 10th of every succeeding month and a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards legal expenses. The order of the Court below is well-considered and proceeds on a sound exercise of discretion and a cogent analysis of the material on record. This Court discerns no error warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The revision is without merits and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 09.12.2011 bnr