^ a^\y^_ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S1 NO.^Z^ /2010. PETITIONERS: ^ ^o. €^ ^<&w ^^' ^^" •^y Smt.Lilmati Minj, wife of Late Shri Louis Minj, aged about 48 years, working asHead Mitress at Govt. Primaiy School, Patratoli, (Duldula), Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versus ^^.^•<' Respondents ^tn?/^x ^-^ 'jM.jh^itj ^\ ^n^ / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Comniissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^3. Asst.Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. . 4. Block Education Officer, Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA s' ^n^T^T'f^N' ^T^II ^TI^T sb^iq^ *IS*1<fl ^W<^ ~3^r ^jj^Kri^i, ^til^^<o, [®jcni^s^< . wP^;^.3^^° •"^ 200 3^?T Tt^W ( y<?^<^) ^rrTW^cT3^r SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohar ?hri Harish Khuntiya, counsel for the 09-07-2010 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao with petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel La|wyer for the State/respondents on advance copy. Heard. twb otder Leamed counsel appearingj petitioner is entitled to benefit of she having passed B. Ed. examinati<)n cost. It is submitted that the issue longer res integra and the same ha^ Supreme Court in the case of 20W (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furth| taken a similar view in his W.P.(S)No.6257of2008. Learned attention of this Court to order No.124 of 2009, wherein relying in the case of Asha Saxena (supra)| another Writ Appeal No.B7/20Q9\ consjderation of the case for gran( circular dated 21-09-1974 issued bt^ veriffoation ofthefacts pleaded in Leamed counsel for the petitioner would also be considered | dat4d up^n ithb CM^(<n<4)i TTW^ff ^f f^t <F3i^« '^'^ffw^Tr^r Shrivastava, J. |for the petitioner submits that the advahce increments on account of before her appointment at her own fnvolved in the present petitton is no been finally decided by ttie Hon'ble sl^ Sseena vss. ^ate of M.P. & Ors., ar submjtted that this Court has also dated 06-02-2009 passed in ^ounsel for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passKl in Writ Appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court |and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advarrce increnrents as per tiie State of Madhya Prerclesh, after petitjon. r^pondents submits that case of the bn frie same lines. (5 ^ ^T"^^ A ' *A ..^^\ '^. ^-G) 1 ^ s •^.y../ ^ST ^WW^, ^T[\W\<c, f®IC'11-H^< \A) 1/^)^.3^10 <<row "^ 200 ^H^T 'tW°^ (^^^?) ^l^T "3RT ^J^i 1OTY3T¥^TiFRW ;T L\ Tumane In view of the statement ma^ disposed of with a directjon to the resp| decide the claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued after verification ofthe facts plead^J jn| weeks from today. c?iHl<n*i1i *ii*i<VN ^f fe^l 'tf^l^K ^^tRpT^n^T pe above, this petifion is finally iondent authoritie6 to consicter and gfant of two advance increnrents as |>y the State of Madhya Pradesh, [the i^tition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ??H^W ^N^T %OTT^<fT, <R^ fcflt^ —-FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000.