jiIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPQR DIVISION BENCH HON‘3LE HON'BLE SHRI SHRI SATISH JAGDISH K BHALLA, A$NIHQTRI Ag. J’. CJ' Wm» Eamon (c) Na.4823¢2go7 Pe‘tifioner M/s Tirupa‘ri Road Lines, Th rough S/o 11‘s Farmer La‘re Shri Ram Qam Kishan Lai Agcrwult Das Ambikapur, Agarwal, R/o Sarguja New Bus Dist Smnd, CG 5mm. Versus 1. Som‘h Easfem Coa! Fieid Limimd, fhrough ifs Chairman - 'cum - Managing Director, SECL Bhawan, Sfafe Seepm‘ Raad, Biiaspur Dis? CG Chief General Manager, Contrac'r 'Seepaf Managemenf Road, Eifaspur Ce", SECL CG Sfa're Bhowan, wrif Pem’ion under Am’cle 226 of *he Consfifufion of inéjg Shri Shri P5 KR Koshy, Nair, counsel counsei for for fhe fhe peTiTioner. respondenfs. Present .' Orai Order (PaSsed an 16’“ August 2007) F 2 ) as fnere was s11” five minutes Ief‘r. In fhis connecfion he indica‘l’ed fhm‘ The dock of 1'he Office was five minufes fast IT has been furfher submitfed by Iear'ned counsel for The peTiTioner Tha‘!’ indirec‘rly, his fender form was accep‘i'ed. No o‘rher poinT has been urged. if has been argued on behaif of The respondenTs ThaT The Tender box was sealed aT The scheduled Time. We find ThoT, The Thing which can noT be done direcTly, The same can noT be done indirecTly. PeTiTioner can noT insisT ThaT iTs Tender form be accepTed af‘l‘er The Tender box was sealed as peTiTioner does noT have legal righT To seek inTerference in The maTTer in quesTion. FurTher, This CourT can noT eh’rer inTo The facTual conTroversy beTween The parTies under ArTicle 226 of The ConsTiTu'Tion of India. Accordingly, The wriT ‘_,~ padma peTiTion is dismissed. Sdl- Sd/— Jagdish Bhalla Ag. Chief Justice ‘y l Satish K. Agnihotri I Judge