1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA Nos.1461/2010; 2584/2010; 9718/2009 in FA NO.2449/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.PS Chavan, Adv. for applicant; Mr.SY Mahajan, Adv. for Respondent No.1 Mr.PM Kulkarni, Adv. for Respondent No.3. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 25th February, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) In a petition under Workmen’s Compensation Act, owner of the jeep has deposited the amount, as directed by the learned Commissioner under the Act. The claimants and the widow of the deceased have sought withdrawal thereof. The owner is in appeal, challenging the order of saddling the liability. 3) Considering the grounds raised in the appeal, the claimants and widow – Urmila wd/o Shrirang Late, are allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees four lacs) from the amount deposited before the Executing Court at Osmanabad. 4) Both the applications are allowed as above. 2 5) The appellant – Sandipan Namdeo Garge indeed has deposited the entire amount under the Award, and withdrawal prayer is made by the claimants, consequently, the order under challenge is stayed subject to the orders in respective petitions from the claimants for withdrawal of the amount. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca1461.10