C482 No. 437 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Heard. By means of this petition moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short Cr.P.C.) the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 21.02.2011, passed by Judge Family Court, Haridwar, in case no. 174 of 2009, whereby said court has directed the petitioner to pay maintenance at the rate of ` 500/- per month to his wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is already paying ` 1,000/- per month under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Perusal of the impugned order shows that above mentioned fact has been considered by the trial court before directing to pay ` 500/- per month to the wife. There are sufficient reasons mentioned in the impugned order to pass the same. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial court. Therefore, the petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 22.06.2011