IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10484 of 2010 SAHID @ MD.SAHID, S/o Md. Kamaruddin. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 22.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 448, 376 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the informant learnt that her daughter had died and when she reached the village of occurrence she was told that her daughter has sustained sun-stroke and died on account of it. Two days later she learnt from some villagers that the deceased was strangulated to death by the petitioner who had committed rape upon her. However, there is no eye-witness to the occurrence and apart from a vague speculation about this there is no cogent material in support of the same. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in connection with Karaghar P.S. 2 Case No. 88 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)