IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP.No. 3709 of 2010. Date of Decision: 24.8.2010. _______________________________________________ Kesar Singh. ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ..….Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner : Mr.K.S.Banyal, Advocate. For Respondent. : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of his transfer Annexure:P2 dated 30th June, 2010. The case of the petitioner is that according to the medical report Annexure:P3, he has been advised for bypass surgery and in these circumstances, he must have access to advanced medical facilities. The petitioner pleads that in case he is posted in a place which is distant from medical facilities, it will not be congenial to his health. Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?yes . 2 In these circumstances, it is directed that the respondent shall consider the case of the petitioner more especially keeping in view his medical history. While deciding the representation, the respondent will consider posting of the petitioner in or near the place where medical facility of the nature required by the petitioner is available. The decision shall be taken by the respondent at the earliest on the presentation of this order. The petitioner shall be given a chance of being heard, if he so desired. The petition is disposed of. Interim order shall continue till the case is disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. August 24, 2010(R)