IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 132 of 2009 Chhaya Sharma ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for State/respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Rejoinder affidavit filed in Court is kept with the record. 2. The writ petition is utterly frivolous. After bifurcation of the State of Uttar Pradesh, by Annexure Nos. 3 and 4 to the writ petition, certain employees allocated finally to the State of Uttar Pradesh have been relieved. The purpose of this writ petition is to stop the same on the ground that appropriate people to serve the people of the State are not available. This cannot be a ground to permit one State to retain employees of another State to work for that State. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. We have, with great efforts, restrained ourselves from imposing exemplary costs in the matter. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 04.01.2011 04.01.2011 Aswal