IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1212 of 2009 Date of decision: 5.3.2009 Bhag Singh and others ......Petitioners Versus Associates India Financial Services Ltd. ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Bahadur Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners/judgment-debtors for setting aside the impugned order dated 10.1.2009 whereby their objections have been dismissed under Order 21 rule 66 CPC. It is the contention of the petitioners that they had mortgaged only one room with the respondent as per Gift Deed dated 6.11.1992 (Annexure P-1) whereas whole of the property is being sold in execution of the award dated 29.6.2004 and thus, their objections have been wrongly rejected by the trial Court. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. I find no merit in this petition. Admittedly, the petitioners are owners of one room only as averred by them as per the Gift Deed (Annexure P-1) and they are not the owners of the remaining property which is alleged to be sold in execution. Since the petitioners are not the owners of the remaining property, they have no locus standi to file objections with regard to that property. Dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are ready to pay/deposit decretal amount. If that is so, the petitioners may CR No.1212 of 2009 -2- approach the Executing Court and deposit the amount in accordance with law and thereafter, the Executing Court shall pass further order in accordance with law. March 5, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE