IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 1019 of 2008 POONA RAM V/S STATE & ORS Mr. RS CHOUDHARY, for the appellant. Date of Order : 23.1.2009 HON'BLE SHRI AM KAPADIA,J. HON'BLE SHRI SANGEET LODHA,J. ORDER ----- This intra-court appeal is directed against order dated September 10, 2008 rendered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6913 of 2008 by the learned Single Judge of this Court, by which the petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed and, therefore, prayer made by the appellant to quash and set aside orders dated 25.12.1998, 24.03.2000, 04.07.2002 and 28.07.2008 (respectively Annex.2 to 4 to the petition) and further prayer to declare the sale deed Annex.6 null & void, has been refused. We have considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the appellant. On a perusal of the impugned order, it is seen that the appellant did not dispute the document of sale deed executed by him in the year 1966. The contention of the appellant before the learned Single Judge was that the document is not a registered document and on the basis of said document no mutation could be made. The contention is devoid of merit as all the authorities below have arrived at a concurrent finding that any document having valuation less than Rs.100 is not required to be registered, and therefore, it was not required to be registered as per the Registration Act. Another contention of the appellant that it was the duty of the Revenue Authorities to assess the value of the land at the time of mutation, also deserves to be rejected as the appellant himself has executed the sale deed in the year 1966 and when the appellant himself has executed the sale deed, he cannot voice the grievance. On overall view of the matter, according to us, learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the petition. For the reasons aforesaid, appeal fails and accordingly it is dismissed. ( SANGEET LODHA ),J. ( AM KAPADIA ),J. JPA