1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 333 of 2010 Sau Kiran v. State and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.V. Sirpurkar, Adv for applicant Mr Adgokar, APP for respdt no.1-State Mr Anil Marsikar, Adv for respdt no.2 Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 27.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By order dated 25th August 2010, learned counsel for respondent no.2 was directed to take instructions as to whether bail, pursuant to the order dated 14.1.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, has been availed of by respondent no.2 or not. In response, respondent no.2 has filed affidavit stating that he has furnished bail bonds on 15.1.2010. He has also furnished affidavit of one Ganesh who has stood surety for respondent no.2. Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that the applicant was deemed to be in the custody of the Court, there is no overwhelming ground made out to cancel benefit of bail granted in favour of respondent no.2. That being so, application is dismissed. Judge. 2 joshi