^^ •v3-3~.-df''XI-HG—78 l^^ '3^ "4l<4ld-4, yitily'iG, H<iiyy,< SII^T •^VF! (iyf^s|^q) 37T^?T "^T f^ft^' ^SH 3TT^?T sti^tqr. ?WIWHf?ct al^t Writ Petifc RESPONDSNTS aged abo' Durg (Cht \ State of Departme Bhawan, The Distr Durg, 3. Shri D.R. School, Si Writ Petitioa U/A 226 2. IChhattisgai-h, Through The Secretarv, |.it ot Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. paipur (Chhattisgarh) |ct Education Officer, Bemetara, District Chltiattisgarh. ISahu, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondar>r jija, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. bf the Constitution of India S.B. HON'BLB SHRI DHIRBNDR 1 '3 J-<5» Mr. Saajay K. Agrawal aad peutioner. Ms. Sunita Jaia, PL for the The petitiouer, who is Blod by fhe iastaat petition has in: (Annexure P/ 1) whereby he has Girls Higher Secoudaiy School, B Mr. Saajay K. Agrawal, subniits the aforesaid order has respondent No. 3, who was Officer vide Annexure P/3 dated order of traasfer of fhe Detitioner. the respoudents No. 1 & 2. th nnuueued order ia place ofrespQ i*Wicf<i)-< llllRff ^l fs^S <pil«(lt ^sifiltiailtw on(8)No.5619/2008 ;lahre. Son Shri Bhuwan Lal Ghritlalire -it 43 yeg.rs, Resident of Saja, District lattisgarh) ersus 4. MISHRA, J. jMr. Sourabh Sharma, coiuisel for fhe IState. Education OfBcer, Saja, Distt. Durg, Ipugned the order dated 26.9.2008 been transfen-ed as Lecturer, Govt. linietara. |leamed counsel for tlie petitiouer j^een passed just to accominodate the tra^isferred to Saja as Block Education 118.8.2008 without any correspon.ding When fhis fact came to the notice of petitiouer was transferred bv the bdent NQ. 3. He further subinifs that .^-SG—78 ^ST "41'41<rfA|, Sflly'ie, fs«'ll-Mll,< ^WCTI th*<l<*» 31I^?IT?^' (•Ipfgq^q) an^l ^l f<;-li<* '^sn 3n^?r s?i*i TRnw^rfrow^i 'hllicl'fl-f 414cff if fS'St <[«1«;1< ^aifinsn^t iu tlie transferred place, Goi Beinetara, the subject of the peti I have heard learned coun; It is settled law that traas but also a coudition of service. a PubUc Undei-taldng has anv les place or place of his ehoice. Thi in exercise of discretionary juris ti-aiisfer uiider Article 226 of the finds that either fhe order is Dia] such transfer, or that ffae autho were not competent aufhority to oritiiarilv not ititerfere witii the t is issued arbitrarilv or nialafid suideliiies or the rules goveniui) Thus, havuiR reaard to thi appears to be no ground for int jurisdiction under Article 226 inipuglied traiisfer order of fhe pi However, if fhe Detitioneii traasfer order. Uie same inav be on its own nierits expeditiously, froin flie date of receipt of such i1 The petition is, accordiughj rt. Girls Hieher Secondanr School. ioner i.e. Geography is not taught. .el for th? petitiouer. fer is not onlv an incidence of service <o Goveniinent sei'vaut or einployee of Sal right to be posted at auy particular : Court should ordiaarily not uiterfere diction of the State ui the niatters of Constitation of India rmless tlie Court a£deor that the service rules prohibit nties. who issued the tran.sfer oiders. Ipass such orders. The Courts should Irsuisfer order unless the trausfer order 'ely or iu violation of aay operative the traasfer. ; above settled principle of law, there ;rference bv fhis Court in exercise of of ftie Constitution of India in. the ititioner. inakes a representatiou agaiast his ;onsideied bv fhe coacemed authdrit\- areferably within a period of six weeks ioresentation, ui accordance with law. , disposed of. ~~~~~" Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge •^