HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 273 of 2009 (M/S) Wahid Hussain …. Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents Mr. T.A. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. K.K. Shah, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. 20th April, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Statement has been made at the bar by Mr. T.A. Khan and Mr. K.K. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-Bank respectively that an agreement has been reached between the parties by which as a final settlement Rs. 8,00,000/- has to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent-Bank out of which Rs. 4,00,000/- has already been paid and the remaining 4,00,000/- shall be paid by 30.4.2009. On the basis of this statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that 10 per cent recovery charges, which are now being recovered from the petitioner are also not liable to be recovered. However, there is no contention or elaboration in this aspect by the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to make any comment on the matter of recovery charges. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the 10 per cent recovery charges by filing a fresh writ petition. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 20.4.2009 Avneet