1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1014 OF 2010 Ajay s/o Sunil Vidhate ... APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.E. Gondkar, Advocate holding for Mrs. S.S. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicants Shri P.P. More More, A.P.P. for respondents ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 28h April, 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard Mr. S.E. Gondkar, learned counsel holding for Mrs. S.S. Jadhav, learned counsel for the applicant as well as heard Mr. P.P. More, learned A.P.P. for the respondents. 2. After hearing both the learned respective counsel for the parties for considerable time, Mr. More, learned A.P.P., on instructions, stated that, name of the applicant namely Ajay Sunil Vidhate does not reflect in the contents of the complaint as well as the investigation papers also do not reveal the name of the applicant namely Ajay Sunil Vidhate allegedly involved in the 2 alleged offence, and the said statement is accepted and taken on record. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement and its acceptance, Mr. S.E. Gondkar, learned counsel holding for Mrs. S.S. Jadhav, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, requested to withdraw the present application. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, present application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE fmp/cri1014.10