1 wp-7110.10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7110 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri S.S. Patwardhan for the Petitioners. Shri Sanjeev Kadam for the Respondent No.1. Mrs. P.S. Cardozo, AGP for Respondent No.3 -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2010 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the 1st Respondent and the learned AGP for the 3rd Respondent. 2. In a proceeding under the Maharashtra Local Authority Members ( Disqualification ) Act, 1987, by the impugned order, an application for re-examination of a witness has been allowed. 3. When this Writ Petition came up before this Court 2 wp-7110.10 on 6th September, 2010, though this Court did not grant any ad-interim relief, this Court observed that if any question is put to the witness which cannot be put by way of re-examination, the Petitioners can always raise an objection to that question. Apart from the said clarification, the learned counsel for the 1st Respondent agreed that in the event final order passed in the disqualification proceedings is adverse to the Petitioners, while challenging the final order, the Petitioners can always raise a contention that the impugned order is illegal. It will be always open for the Respondents to challenge the impugned order while challenging the final order passed in the disqualification proceedings. 4. Subject to what is observed above as well as what is observed in the order dated 6th September, 2010, it is not necessary to entertain this Petition. The Petition is disposed of by keeping the remedy of the Petitioners open. (A.S.OKA, J)