Civil Revision No.3069 of 2007 Swaran Mehta & ors. Versus Vinay Kumar & ors. Present: Mr.Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Sumeet Mahajan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,5,6,7 and 22. ***** This is plaintiff's revision petition against the order dated 26.04.2007 whereby application of the defendants for additional evidence by producing Ram Sarup who is conversant with the signatures of Sujan Singh, Nambardar(marginal witness of the disputed Will) was allowed. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that now the aforesaid Ram Sarup has died. In my view the present revision petition has become infructuous. The counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents have moved a fresh application before the trial Court for producing Sh.Gurbachan Singh, Nambardar in additional evidence to prove the signatures of Sujan Singh(marginal witness of the disputed Will). It is the apprehension of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the trial Court will be swayed by the earlier order dated 26.04.2007 and will allow the application. The apprehension of the petitioner is without any basis. If any such application is pending before the trial court that is to be decided on its own merits and in accordance with the law. With the aforesaid observations the revision petition stands disposed of having become infructuous. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 20.02.2009 neenu