1^0^ '€. ^3y:s^s~t", iSsSllifc SENCH C -f-(/-zro In the Honble Hiflh Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P. (S) No. ^8 1 2007 Petitioner ^K- -^y' ^^y Smt. Kanta Sinha ,Aged 62 years (Before Marriage Ku. Kanta Shrivastava ) D/0 Shri Deokinandan Shrivastava, Retired Assistant Teacher, Titurdih Primery Kanya School No.-1, Sikola Bhatta DistrictDurg(C.G.) VERSUS Respondent... ^- 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Education & Tribal Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^2. The District Education Officer, Durg (C.G) •\>'fr<^ Wnt fietition under articjes 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance ofwrit in the nature of MANDAMUS, X(-HC-7S wfeNi (PIT 3I1^?T aiW Bablu ^.'^ 3^ -i<i'i<id<i, »T(I«'IS,fdctitiy —.^•.f-.C?J'JO-62-2_ *<I*IMI sft+fiqi ••••••"••-"•........^- 2007 sn^rq^R'(<prfg^c) s^cnwofersn^r 1.2.2007 Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel With tha consent of matters are heard finally and Common order dictate< A copy of this order petjtions. *Mh^ W^'iifSt^^KZK ^srf^iTsn^r ungei for the petitioners. myer for the respondents/State. leamed counse! for the parties, the tsspoad of. in W.P. (s) No. 626 of 2007 in open e placed on record in connected writ Sd/- SatishK.Agnibotri Judge P.T.O. ^S) HI6H COURT OF CHHAmS6A8H_ATJIILASPlR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISMIL 4^1HQTRL Z WRTT PETmON ts) NO. 626 OF 2007 Petitioners Resoondents versus Tej Pratap Singh ancf others State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PCTTnON ts) N0 627 OF 2007 Petitioners Resoondents versus 5heo Prasad Verma and others State Govt. of C'hhattisgorh and others Petjtioner WRIT PFTmON fa) N0. 628 OF 2007 Smt. Kanta Sinha (Before marriage Ku. Kanta 5hrivastaya versus Re^ondents The State of Chhattisgarh and oihers Present : Mr.AjayShrivastavci.counselforthepetitioners. Ms. 5uni-ha Jain, Panel tawyer for the 5tate/ respondents. OR DER (Passed on tfiis 1st February, 2007} 1. Leomed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as lenmed Penal lawyer appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are squarely coyered by the decision of this Court in the case of yashwanf Kumar Bhwwdwajv-is. MimSeiptd Cwpopafion. t>wy and cawthei^. 2. Learned counsel appegring for the petitioner has pointed out the circular dated 13.9.1997 (Annexure P/l), whereunder according to 7. - ^o the petitioners, the petitioners, who had obtained B.Ed. Examination Cerhificates before appointment, are also entitled to two odvoince increments. The respondents/State, while considering the cases of the petitioners, shall grant +he relief, in accordance with the circular (supra). For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of yadiwant Kumar Bharadwaj{Su^ro}. subject to verification of the fact osto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per tfie circuiars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 cmd further whether they have been paid two advance insrements or not. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be placed on rscord in connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotri Judge Bablu 1 2006CtI)MPJR-C696