K ia!i:MpB; IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.'I WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 335 '-?- QF 2006 fSERVICE MATTER^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND/OR A SUITABLE DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER PETITIONER: .>A^ Raj Rishi Rai p Age-42 years .^ ^y .^o/' S/o Late Shri H.H.Rai, Presently posted on the post ofAssistant Jailor, Central Jail Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS *y'7 R ENTS / / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of hlome, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. InspectorGeneralofPolice (Prison) Jail Headquarter, Central Jail premises, Raipur (C.G.). DETAILS O^THE PETITION XI-HC-22 3^ •<ii<<i<i<<, ©Tn^'is,Riciiti^< 3)1^1 ^aqi II*ICTI sftllW """""""""" WT 200 R|<)<A an^rw R-ii+sn^r shirotfRc] 3fi^<i gwiwtifer «fi<ifci41-i*<i*iCTTiTteIA'<Ri<-c;i< ^?3i1^T3n^?r Pahel 12.07.2006. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, coi Ms. Deepali Pandey, advance copy. 1-teard. By this writ petition India, the petitioner has ques transfer order dated 23.06.2 working as Assistant Jailer in transferred to Sub-Jail, Dantew^ra jinsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on undler .20fc)6 |er Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of (tioned the legafity and propriety of the on the ground that the petitioner is pentral Jail, Ambikapur and he has been Leamed counsel for thel sanctioned post of Sub-Jailer transferred there, but, there is Leamed counsel submits that violation of Rule 57 of the counsel submits that in the to make a representation to respondents has no objection. petitioner submits that there is onty one ^t Dantewara and the petitioner has been latready one Shri B.S. Mankaris working. petitioner has been transferred in utter Ch|hattisgarh Prisoners Rule,1968. Learned ;irc|umstances, the petitioner may be allowed |respondent No.1 to which counsel for Having heard learned the facts and circumstances oD on merits of ttie case, the limitey petitioners appears to be }us petitioner is allowed to make a| No.1 annexing a copy ofthe in^b from today and in turn, tfi c<tunsel for the parties and having regard to the case, without expressing any opinion prayer laid by Uie learned counsel for the }t, fair and reasonable. Therefore, the detailed representation to the respondent i^tant writ petition withln a period of ten days ie respondent No.1 shall decide the ('f^^l^) XI-HC-22 SIT^TW ^risRsn^r stiHi* uRa fc^ ^y 3^ ^WICI'M, WTflwiS, IslOWy 3ll^?l ^^fti II*<CTI <»i*ii«n ^'y.ftiYA.^s^/o^Wl; 200 sTi^r^tnwflfeT -<?/ representation of the peUtioner of its receipt, in an objective points raised by the petitionere) order, in accordance with law. \|fithin a period of thirty days from the date tnanner, considering and examining the on its own merit and pass appropriate .Nt be^n Also heard on M.(W.)P.f As the petitioner has namely Shri B.S. Mankar is al^ operation of the impugned ordejr the decision ofthe representatio(i With the direction aforesa|id, the writ petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for ceftified copy of this order. °hi<<?<i'41-i *<i'«aT^tetA<Ri*<;i< ^ari^irsn^r i.2617/2006. transferred on a post where a person .0 worldng, therefore, the effect and the in respect of the petitioner is stayed till i. The application stands disposed of. Sd-<- L.C. Bheii300 JucSge (Ifl^y^)