BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15242 of 2011 SHANMUGAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CCIW, CID, POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO.7/2011, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.ARUMUGAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.11.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 408, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477(A) r/w. 109 I.P.C., in Crime No.7 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.Heard Mr.A.Arumugam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the petitioner/accused is working as Appraiser in the Pannavayal Co-operative Society and the de-facto complainant is the Deputy Registrar of the said Society. He would further submit in his argument that the de-facto complainant conducted enquiry on the administration of the said Society and submitted the report that the petitioner/accused and others created forged documents and records as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ they gave gold loans and misappropriated the Society funds. He would further submit in his argument that the investigation is still pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner there should be a stringent condition for the accused persons. 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner is undergoing incarceration right from 09.11.2011, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only)to the credit of Crime No.7 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 29/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, SUB JAIL, PATTUKOTTAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCIW, CID, POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. A.ARUMUGAM Advocate SR.No.41819 SR : 29.11.2011 : 2P/7C : IT ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15242 of 2011 Date :29/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/