IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1220 of 2009 Between: 1 Sri. Md. Yousuf S/o. Late G.A. Jaleel R/o. 58 / 169, Kamsala Street, Rayachoti, Kadapa District. 2 G.A. Kaleem S/o. Late G.A. Jaleel R/o. 58 / 169, Kamsala Street, Rayachoti, Kadapa District. 3 B.S. Ghousiya Begum W/o. B.S. Mohammed Shajahan D.No. 1 / 709, Dwaraka Nagar Colony, Kadapa. 4 G.M. Sayeed S/o. Late G.A. Jaleel R/o. 58 / 169, Kamsala Street, Rayachoti, Kadapa District. 5 J. Fouzia Begum W/o. J. Md. Abid Near Radhika Talkies, Bellary, Karnataka State. 6 S. Aliya Begum W/o. Shaik Kareem Shah Ali Near Jagadamba Hospital, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Principal Secretary Home (General A1) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Joint Collector & Licensing Authority Kadapa Kadapa District. 3 G. Abdul Sattar S/o. Abdul Jaleel D.No. 58 / 169, Kamsala Street, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any Writ, order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the orders vide Ref.C4/ 857 / M / 2007 dated 19-01-2009 granting temporary license to the 3rd Respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the A.P. Cinema (Regulation) Rules 1970 and consequently call for the records and set aside the orders passed by the 2nd Respondent vide Ref.C4 / 857 / M / 2007 dated 19-01-2009 granting temporary license to the 3rd Respondent herein. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri S.Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.05.2.2009 msv