^:: ^t ^r IN THK HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE &T B IL^&PUR(CHHATTI5GARH) WRIT PETITION NOo'2s^t/9-OF 2003 PETITIONER Mrlgendra pratap Singh^ son of Rudra pratap Singh^ aged about 19 years, Occupation-Stu<dent^ resident of Vlllage-Khatola via Akaltara.Tehsil and Bistrict- jainjgir-Champa, (C.G.) V E R S U & RESpOt3DE ES> ^?^^ '^@d"" i l, St;ate of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary^ Department of Technical Education^ Mantaralay,D.K.S.Building,Raipur, District-Raipxir, (C.G. ) $ 2^ Dlrector, Technical Education,Chhattisgarh, Raipur^ (C»G<) s 3^ Chaxrmana Councilling Conunittee of Technical Educatlon»WCTFiens polytechnic Oollege Building,Raipur,District Raipur, (C.G, ? 4< Chhattisgarh Board of Seconadary Educatj.on,through its Seceretary, Raipur,(C,G.) ^^ WRIT pETmON UNDSR ARTICLES 22^/227 dF THE /^ f^ COK6TITUTION OF INDIA.s IF:t^t;^iawt*i; ^<:' •g-sr -^TiTM^^. ^•Tit^T^, t^TRTy W<P..No.2547 of 1 ^1,08.03 I: ^ Shrl prashant Mishra|, counsel for the petltioner <, Shri Sanjay K. Agraw^l,. Deputy Advocate General takes notlce on behalf of r. Heard both the coims' By this petitlon7und' ^spondenfcs 1 to 3o ki. ^r Article 226/227 of the Constitutlon of India^ the t>etitioner seeks a direction against respondents 1 -& 2 t|^ allow the petitioner to -. participate in the cAunsell|Lng for admission in the Engineer ing cour se in Goverfiment and private Engineering Colleges. in the State ,of Chjtattisgarho The petltioner-8 s pet|Ltion is that he appeared In Class-.XII examinatlon cJ3ndacted by the Board of Secondary Eduaation, dhhattjtsgarho The result^ of the examination w^^r~aeclared i^ the month of Apr 11,2003^ However^ the petitioner8s r respondent No<4 and that wajs declared only on ,28th j July, 2003. On acooant of ^hat, the petitloner could i not apoly for adrnission to ^he Engineering College in time<» The petitioner couldi "in the Eagineeriag. Colleges! j because the lasfc date was 0|7<, 07<2003 .and the result of pn 28.07«2003e —^— J the petitloner was declaredi psult was withheld by not also apply for counselling befor e r esoondent No , 2 Gi. PRJ—FS/350— 12/2000—50.000. XI-HG—78 -3-^r -^TTSfM^^ ^i^TT5^ f^Tray N.P.N0.2547 of ^V -q^q? Crt^i') ^ •dm - 2--^ -S, JTS^f ^ Learned coiinsel for ^he petitioner submits that withoat fault on beha^£.»of^he petitionec respondent ^ol.4 had unnecessarily not declaj|ed the result of the petitioner and on account of that the ^ast date for applying in the Englneerlng Colleges wa4 expited^ Counsel further si^mits that he made repres^ntation to the Ghief Minister and th@ representation has yeen forwarded to the Education Minlste.r^, But the responde4ts are not allowing the petitioner. to participate i4 further sutomits that seats s|re lylng vacant and the petitioner is prepared to ,s^ek admission even if the admission is granted in anyy| A^ V<<^JL College, Hesubmits that General opposed the petitio^ petitioner has not applied wgithin time, thetefore, he cannot be allowed to part|icipate in the counselling^ He f'^rther submitted that tl^e petitioner is seeking direction contrary to the ru|les and resoondents 2 & 3 are not resoonsible for the Having heard the leaylaed counsel for the parties and having regard to th.e fac|;s and clrcumstances' af-ti the coansellinge He the petitioner has secured n|arks Mgher than the person^ who have already been admittjed to the Engineering Course. On the other hand^ ti^e learned Oeputy Advocate ^and submitted that the |ielay in any manner • XI-HC-22 %i%'% 'fetiK^ElPS ^fN^ ^it^n :\-—^ 'SM ^^i<^^ ^€lWt%, ('Sl^W^ ^fffW tl5E^ ISffS^'SffS^9^^^^ '^^^^ 169 ^PS^SF* ^(^1 yi^t^FC <S%^ -^- case/1 am of the opiniors that us of ^ petition. However, it is for the respoil sent by the petitioner and for that p| furni^h Q copy of the repre^entation 'l it is fcr rssporsden+s 2 & 3 to dscids vacant and if they con^ider that the ground taken by him, then they can aii< admission in the Engsneering course, if Aaco^dm^iy, th^ wrii+ pesti+ion jS'l Certsfisd copy todGy. 4tWteiB4 w-feB-ft toiB ^t^ft Ight, no relief con be^ranted in thi^ aents to con^Eder the representation |rpp^e th©petitioner is cst liberty to o the Office of re^pondent No.2 and |his reprssentGtion, if the seats ore letitioner's case is fit, Iboking to the |w him to appear in the counseling for |?therwise, he is eIiQibte for the same. and^ di^po^ed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge -'5. 'x^ •n/ 3-