IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32369 of 2010 Vishwajeet Kumar, son of Dayanand Lal Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, thirteen packets of brown sugar were recovered from the grocery shop of the petitioner. First Information Report does not disclose the weight of the aforesaid seized brown sugar. Impugned order of learned Sessions Judge also does not disclose the above stated fact. Furthermore, learned P.P. also could not succeed to point out the aforesaid fact. Even after perusal of the Case Diary, it is not clear as to whether any measurement was done by the Seizing or Investigating Officer of this Case or not. In absence of aforesaid measurement, it is very difficult to ascertain as to how much quantity of brown sugar has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and in my view, the aforesaid weakness of prosecution case will go in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner, namely, Vishwajeet 2 Kumar, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 280 of 2010 ( Special Case No. 03 of 2010). Let the copy of this order be sent to the Superintendent of Police, Nawada for needful Ashwini/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)