1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4544 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra, Through Nandurbar City Police Station, Nandurbar, Dist.Nandurbar APPLICANT VERSUS Dattatraya Krushanarao Yevale, and others RESPONDENTS Mr.N,B.Patil, learned APP for applicant. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 18/01/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicant has approached this Court to quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 16/09/2009, passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar by which the anticipatory bail application of the respondent, wherein Criminal Application No.91/2009 was allowed and the respondents were released on anticipatory bail. 2. Heard learned APP appearing for the applicant State and perused the impugned order under challenge by way of the present application. Also perused the complaint filed by the complainant 2 dated 22/08/2009. Considering the reasons recorded by the learned Trial Court, in which the learned trial court has in detail have discussed the documentary evidence against these applicants which find place in the departmental inquiry against the deceased, who has committed suicide, for which wife of the deceased has lodged the complaint against these respondents. Perusal of paragraph no.10,11, and 12 clearly shows that out of these 6 respondents, respondent no. 1,2 and 3 were not in service of the bank at all when the alleged incident took place. At the same time, so far as the remaining respondents are concerned, they are the office bearers and the directors of the bank, but the reasons which are recorded about the report of inquiry conducted against the deceased which they have submitted and intimated to the deceased, they can not be faulted if they have intimated the report of the inquiry to the deceased. Even if the deceased has committed suicide, this can not be taken as an abatement or instigation at the hands of these respondents. As no fault find in the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, It is not necessary to issue notices to the respondents. Application stands rejected in limine and stands disposed of. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JAN 2010/cri.appl.4544-09