: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.103 OF 2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------ CORAM : P.V.KAKADE,J. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 P.C.: 1. The state has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the Judgment and Award dated 26.7.1995 in LAR No.8 of 1989 passed by Addl. Dist. Judge, Pune. 2. The total area of land was 0.06 Rs from Gat No.209 at the rate of 16,700/= per hectare. The award shows that the SLAO has fixed the market price and paid compensation of Rs.375/= to the respondents. The total award came to Rs.1871.46 ps. out of which : 2 : rs.375/- is already paid by the SLAO to the respondents and therefore, the appeal is preferred against the judgment and order allowing the reference dated 267.1995. 3. Heard the learned AGP. Perused the judgment of the trial court. Having considered all relevant aspects I do not see any interference is called for especially when it is apparent that the trial judge has taken into account all the relevant aspect while fixing the fair market price of the impugned land and awarding the compensation as noted aforesaid. In the result the appeal is devoid of merits and stands dismissed with no order as to costs. 4. It is clarified that this judgment and order shall not act as precedent in all the connected matters relating to the lands impugned herein.