CRM NO. M-17036 OF 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-17036 OF 2010 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 22.02.2011 Dr. Bhoop Singh Khatri ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate and Mr. Devender Punia, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) As per allegations made in the FIR, the petitioner is working as doctor and he used to manipulate injuries to make the offence grevious. The Board of Doctors has given opinion against the petitioner. Similar matter was thrashed by this Court vide order dated 16.08.2010 passed in CRM No. M-19727 of 2010 titled as, “Dr. Sanjay Verma vs. State of Haryana” . It has been observed by this Court in that case that “grant of anticipatory bail at this stage may create serious impediment in the way of investigating agency. It may not be able to unravel the entire modus operandi of commission of crime.” CRM NO. M-17036 OF 2010 (O&M) -2- So, keeping in view the report of Board of Doctors that the petitioner has manipulated so many MLRs to arrive at a correct conclusion, his custodial interrogation is required. So, in these circumstances, the petition for grant of anticipatory bail stands dismissed. FEBRUARY 22, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE