^?ss'?1 .<Ft'::T'"fe. ^^^^'"^. ''i' ^ "% Wl'?s»!!!'^. S '^ •'BsiK •^. ').;' •-:.'.• •rt''*.S:^i^J ^ !fe^c) 'w" ~^51 •*(|^|"1<1. •Bi1!+ii,rt :1~<|.U4< NS1CT! WW) ;00 a.n^l'qq^Cytg^qs 3TI^[^If^W wn aii^i rfiHi* / Petitioner TRBWflfWaT^T ''3-;^JC1^^ '^j^^ 'Gf 'fy^'^^^i ^? sng?; ^B!^; DIVISION BENCH; HON'BLE Mh. DHIREN&RA WSHRA & HON'BLE MR. R.N. ChANDRAKAR. JJ (Petitiorf undsr Ar+isie £26/227 Versug Ramesh Kumaj Shri C>inesh ^ D/2-D Type,| &alii-&ajhara, 1. State of Sscr'etciry Raipur((;6)| 2.Superii 3.5tation (C6) 4.&eocharan 5inha, R/c Schooi Roa<j nten4en Hoilse of +hc Con^'t'stu+icn of IndEo) \ Shrivastoya, cqed 57 years, son of [}rosad Shrivostava, R/o Qr. No.51- Nirmal Engineering School Road, i&istt. t>urg (C6) ChhaTtisqarh. throuqh Principal [E^ome), Af\ontina!aya, b.K.S. Bhawar!^ snt of Police, Distt. &urg (CSO Otticer, P.5. Rajharc, Distt. Ourg ft inha, ag©d20 years^ son of Loknath ;r. No.Sl-C' lype, Nirmal bngineer'ing baili-ftajhara, Distt. Durg (C6) Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocafe for the petitioner. 1 AAr. U.N.5. &eo, 6ovt. Advocat? for the State. Heard on I.A. No.2. aDDlicatidin for taking orowess reoort of -iqation on record. ! ADDiication is al'owed. ReDortlis take" on record. [ . .^.^.--—..^-.——.-..--. .^^-.-^-- --.:- From perusa! of the reports submltted by the respondent State from time to tjme, it is seen that thfe respondents are mciking'earnest sfforts to trace the daughter of the petitioner namely Kumari Piyush Pooja Shrivastava. From perusal of the latest progress report it ^T^—^S-95-—H/20itr;—'.;)0 O.U ^ Xf-HC—78 ^SE[';:rTraiOT', ®tI1y<ic,fa<ni'Mli< HWWI (hHltft ••^200 SII^T T?qr C^f^S?) 311^1 ^ll^iTO tim SIR^I aiiit TCiTWflfetsnt^ -c^- !:BWirt41-) ^WvS tf fe^t TfiR?? ^affilHSIlt?! :9t ?,. y' •*fif r.6.; \' ^ reveaied 1+iat the respondents |iave issued a pubiic notification that whoever provides lead for , by a sum of.Rs.5,000/-. vs-^ft stiue,:i wistS ~ '" i5'!<Mm'infce@ni(ed counsel for !g the missina qiri shail be rewardea ^ petitioner also submits that al •»?IS3 DOSSi for t''Qcina Kuhari Pu|a and sald Deycharan Sinha haye been made by the responde^its. He further submits that he had hintf tried to contact the pelfitioner to ver'ify whether he has any information regarding whereabo|jts of his missing daughter or soid Oeycharcin Sinha. However. hisfcommunications were not rssDonded by the petitioner'.' Taking into consideration var'ious repor'ts submitted by the resoondent-State in comDlianceolF the directions of this Court, we are satisfied that the Dolice are mbkina earnest efforts to trace the missing daughter of the petitior^r as well as swd Devcharan Sinha, however. without any success. A^ with a direction to the concerned Station House Officer of the cl with sincere efforts for tFacina cordingiy, we dispose of this petition Superintendent of Police as well as tincerned police station to continue missinq oirl of the Detitioner. Vi/e further direct the petitioner to a^sist the police in their efforts. tsi; Sd/- Dliirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. CHANDRAKAR. Judge