^ HIGHCOURfOFCHHATTISGARHATBlLASPUR .••.-••'.f^.iEMVl6lOM-'BEN© ::'':.:^ GORAM^ HO BLESHRtRAJEEVGUPTA,6J. ^^^^^ H^ Writ^RDeal N0^56 of 2010 ADoellants RespoHclents/State N6.Q1ta03 ffi Responxleht Retitioner ;Sta(©of Chhattisgarh, TMrougb^fl?e SeGretary, Water | Resouroes I3e(?artment ^ DKS Bttawan, Mantralaya, Raipur.CtiBattisgaFh^ The Engineer-in-Ctlief, Water Resourc^' Bepartment,' R^pur, Chhattisgarh The Ghief Engineer,- Water Resdyrces Department, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS Pawenyus Lakra, S/Q; Jeeyan Masi Lakra,^aged^abBut4-4'^yeSrs,Qpp: DuFg^i I; IVIai'Idit', S Gatidhelpara, ^iail<!aiif|(:>u:|-,/::,,!': • '•'-clistrict^ •-^ Kwea, WntADi aluricleiS^GtiolKi^^Ko1;Shed©litiattisaartiHiahGourt : ,1.:.^ '^:£(ADbeal:tSiOi^!sionSBen^tlScti,:;2008.'':',;7.;:...'::;. Present: Shri Kishore Btiadyri, learned AdditionaF^ A^ ©enenalfortheappellants/State. Shri K.R. Nair, learnedcounselfortl-iefespondent. JIUDGIWIENT <4tnAi.ic|Ust,20K)y The Nl<^ing judgment pf the Court^^^^ w Rajeev'Gupta.^C.J.^,.^.,'.'.''•.,•::";-.^ l.earaedcoyhselforthe^partiesarehearcl. ili 11 ^ subbu 2) The appellants/ State has filed this writ appeal against the impugnedcommonorderdated 23-11-2009, passed in W.P.(S) NQ.3302^20()&and otherconneGtedwritpetitions. 3) During thecourse of hearing, learned Gounsel forthe parties submitted that the sole issue involved in this writ appeal stands clecided by a Division Bench of this Court vide ^ o^ QS-07-20'1^), passed in Writ Appeal No. 201/2010 and other connectedwritappeals. 4) In this view of the matter, the writ appeal is disposed^of in terms bf the order dated 05-07'-201D, passed m Writ Appeal No.201/2010and otherconhectedwritappeals; 5) No order as to cqste^ Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ~fcy S..S:^*!i,^^a°sf^-'is^^^assSS;sy-saS^S<