^,,..^ ^^ ^fe la ! ^ ''c UIRI-j <-.ri| IRT F(F /'MUATTIfi/SARI-l AT R!l AaPt Ui\^0^.<»S./wn_i__Wr_^HOQ.LIJQSartF^O rt Writ Petition (S) No. 1390 Qf20Q8 PetiSioners 1. 2. Nlrnjan Ram Sahu. S/o Shri Daya Ram Sahu, Age about 40 years, Primary Schoo!, Dounadih (Navagarh), Distt. Durg (C.G.) -dfr Jagmohan Lai Kurre, Si'o Shri Fudruram Kurre, Age about 39 years, Primary Schooi, Gopaipur (Jevra), Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. ShaSruhan Laf Khand Khande, S/o Shri Dukhi Ram Khande, Age about 40 years, Primary Schoo!, Dhourabhata, Navagarh, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) Versus Sugam Chand Joshi, S/o Shri Tulsi Ram Joshi, Age about 38 years, Primary School, Bhassamuda, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) espondents 1 State Go'/t. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribai Oepartment, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Disa.- Durg (C.G) 3. DistricS EducaSion Officer, Bemetara (C.G.) 4. 'lf^^ir C<"it j,?uit<-i,n>»^ ^Vft^-s^v M<i!i?'a-t-^s*H liwF^ ^^uii/ciUVii \«/iH^^?i, itnvclyoiil (C.G.) WRST PETITOIN UNDERARTSCLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDiA Slngte Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smttha Ghai, Panel Laviy'erfor the respondents. 2. ORALORDER (Passed on this 3 day of Marc'n, 2008) Learned counse! appearing fer the petitioners as we!t as learned counsei appsaring for the respondente/State joi'ntly submit that the facts and qussSion of law, invoived in the present writ petiSion, are She same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. ?vlunicipai Corporation. Durs and another (2006 (!!) MPJR-CG 98), which has been disposed of vide order dated 3.4.2006 and the order dated 7.2.2007, passed by this Court tn W.P.(S) No. 697 of 2007 (A. N. V. Satyanarayan & others Vs. of Chhattisgarh & otiiers). Accordingty, the writ petition ss aiiowed in Serms ofthe order passed in the case of Yashv/ant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and W.P.(S) No. 697 of 2007 (supra), subjecS to verificaSion of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./D.Ed./B.T.I./M.Ed. Examination Certfficate on their own expenses, as per the circulars dated 13.9.1974, 24.12.199^, and 1.3.1999 and further whether they have been paid Swo incremenSs or noS. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur