IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6740 of 2011(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- RAJIV GANDHI PADDY PROCURING PROCESSING AND MARKETING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO.878, KANJIRAM P.O., KOTTAYAM-686030, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.MANU GOVIND RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM-686002. 4. PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 6740 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 4th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a Co-operative Society. Proceedings initiated against them resulted in an order of the 1st respondent blacklisting the society and denying disbursement of handling charges. Petitioner filed representation objecting to the said proceedings. Thereafter, they filed writ petition before this Court and in Ext.P1 judgment, this Court directed consideration of the claims. Accordingly, 1st respondent considered the representation and issued Ext.P2 order dated 4/11/2008 ordering disbursement of the monetary claims, but however, retaining the order of blacklisting. That order was not challenged by the petitioner. On the other hand, petitioner has now filed Ext.P3 representation, requesting the 1st respondent to lift the order of blacklisting. It is seeking consideration of Ext.P3, the writ petition is filed. 2. In my view, the prayer cannot be allowed. This is for the reason that Ext.P2 order, by which the request of the petitioner for lifting the blacklisting was rejected, was not challenged by the petitioner, and therefore, has attained finality. WPC No. 6740/11 :2 : If so, Ext.P3 representation made at this point of time requesting for lifting of the blacklisting cannot be entertained. Writ petition therefore fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp