IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: February 18 , 2009 Criminal Misc. M No. 7039 of 2008 (O&M) M/s Convenience Enterprises Pvt. Ltd and others ...........Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ..........Respondents Criminal Misc. M No. 15807 of 2008 Uma Gajapati Raju & Others ...........Petitioners `Versus State of Haryana and another ..........Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Gagan Chhabra,Advocate; Mr.Sudhir Sharma, Advocate and Mr.Nitin Sharma,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sidharath Sarup, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana Mr.K.S. Negi,Advocate and Mr. K.S.Nalwa, Advocate for respondent No.2. ** Sabina, J. CRM No. 8655 of 2009 Application is allowed. Petitioner is exempted from filing the certified copy of Annexure R-2/1. CRM No. 8654 of 2009 Application is allowed. A copy of order dated 30.1.2009 is allowed to be taken on record. Criminal Misc. M No. 7039 of 2008 (O&M) -2- This order shall dispose of Criminal Misc. M No. 7039 of 2008 (M/s Convenience Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. and others vs. State of Haryana and another) and Criminal Misc. M No. 15807 of 2008 (Uma Gajapati Raju and others vs. State of Haryana and another) Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the impugned order dated 13.3.2008 (Annexure P4) passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Gurgaon in Criminal Revision No. 8 of 2008 (M/s Champak Textiles Pvt. Ltd vs. State of Haryana and others). Vide the said judgment, it was observed that the counsel for the revisionist/Developer Company has voluntary offered that he will not alienate the property till his client furnish the bank guarantee as directed. Hence, the revisionist/developer company was held liable by the said undertaking given above. Vide order dated 30.1.2009, (Annexure R-2/1) the Sessions Judge, Gurgaon has dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn in view of the statement made by the counsel for the revisionist. Since the above-said Criminal Revision No. 8 of 2008 has been dismissed as withdrawn, the present Criminal Misc. Petitions are rendered infructuous as by way of the present Criminal Misc. Petitions, the orders passed in Criminal Revision No. 8 of 2008 dated 13.3.2008 have been challenged. The Crl.Misc. Nos.M-7039 of 2008 and M-15807 of 2008 are dismissed as having been rendered as infructuous. ( Sabina ) Judge February 18, 2009 arya