IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3493 OF 2004 Abhay Cable Vision & others. ... Petitioners v/s. Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board & ors. ... Respondents Ms.Usha Purohit for petitioners. Mr.R.M.Sawant, GP with Mr.Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for respondents. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. S.C.DHARMADHKARI, JJ. DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY 2005 DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY 2005 DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Ms.Purohit for the petitioners. Mr.Sawant, GP appears for the respondents. 2. This petition seeks to challenge a public notice issued by respondent No.1-Board, whereby with a view to regulate the operations of the Cable Operators in some 66 colonies under the 1st respondent-Board, the Board has decided to regularise the operators at the rate of Rs.5/- per tenement. The policy has been framed in pursuance of the order made by the Court earlier. It is for the Authorities to decide what policy they ought to have. There were no crystalised rights in favour of the petitioners at any point of time earlier to contend that there is any change in the method being adopted by the respondents. We do not think that we should interfere. Petition is -2- rejected. 3. Ms.Purohit requests for stay of this order. The request is rejected. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)