I TH HH COURT OF JUDATU AT BILASPUR WRIT PE’HTION NQ. I [WP/2006 WRIT ?ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF‘ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) AND OTHER ORDER ISL OR DIRECTION 18) ETC. E,/.—./w, N E IG ICRE OF CHHATTISGARE PETITIONER JR. Bhagat, . , 42 i Aged about years, ‘ lg ‘ S/o — Sim SR, Bhagat, ExecutiV€ g Posted as — Engineer, Tribal Development Pilot Project Division, Water Resources Jagda1pur, District — Bastar, {C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS r 1) State of Chhattisgarh \\ Through: Secretaxy, \\ Resources Water Department ‘ Secretariat, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ‘ Deputy Secretaly, Water Resources Department Secretariat, Bhawan, Mantralaya D.K.S. Raipur (C,G.) L\ B.D. Vaishnav, Assistant Engineer (Design) , Office of the Chief Engineer, 1; i Mahanadi Reservoir Project, ' Raipur, (C.G.) XI-HC»22 821$ 10-3-2006 Shn YC Shanna anJd Shn Vivek Rathore, counsel for tha petitioner Shn GK. Beriwai, Dy. Advocate Generalrfor the State. Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner submns that vnde order dated 28-2-2006 (Annexure-P/1) the petitioner has been posted In the offce of theSupenntendent Engineer. indrawatl Prowct Circle Jagdalput The petitioner is working as Exe we Engineer It Is submnted that by the , impugned order the-charge s to be given to respondent No.3 B.D. Vaishnav, who is working a Assistant Engineer at Raipur,.whereas. nine AssistantEngineemwer avaiiabie at Jagdatpur. Learned counsel submits that therpet'riioner h'a not handed overthercharge and working - in the field It is pointed representation Learned counsel for th State submrts that for the present the petitloner may be directed to make a representation before the. concerned competent authon res and if such represenhtion is made the same shall be considered nd decided Haying [considered an without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in theropi ion of this Courtends of justice will be served if a direction is gi to the petitioner to make a detailed representation‘raising hisrgrie ances before the competent authority of respondents alongwith a cop of the petition and this order within a period, of seven days from tod y and on such representation being tiled, ‘ the competent authority of the respondents shall decide the same on its t x [dew that the petitioner has not made any i c ‘t o ' v ' XLHcizz own meritsin' accordance with l s earty as bossibfe 'pmferablywithin a period af one month frcm the date af receipt of representatmn It Is made clear that If any gneva still remams the petmoner may aval Vthe remedy available under the l . ' ‘ Learned ccunsel for the ‘ htloner submits that the petitioner has not been relieved and he prays f grant af Interim protection ln View of the above It i ‘ directed that if the petitioner has no been relieved he may be allow d ta continue tlll the representatien rs V decrded lt ls made clear that Ift e petitioner has already been relieved this order wrll not entitle hlm to re om at the earlier place of posting Wlth the aforesaid observ trons- this petitron stands disposed at. Consequently, M.(W.).P 63/2006 also stand disposed of Certified copy as per mies. l l i l Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge “new ~ n a a a t . 8