IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4999 of 2008 Decided on: 04.08.2010 Sita Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate No. 1 General. For the respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent No. 3 : None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 4, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?