1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 240 OF 2007 Shri Ramchandra Govind Sorate ... Applicant Vs. Shri Dajiram Govid Sorate since deceased through legal heirs: 1) Bhimrao Dajiram Sorate & Ors. ... Respondents Shri S.K.Chinchalikar, Advocate,for the applicant. Shri Amit Borkar, advocate, for the respondents. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 15th January, 2010. P.C. 1. The application is filed by the original respondent for review of the order dated 10.9.2009 passed in C.A. No.440/2007. The learned Counsel contends that the appellant was not in possession, while this Court in the first sentence in para 2, has recorded “The appellant is in possession of the suit land admeasuring 6 Hectares 31 Ares.” He also argued that the relief granted in favour of the appellant be recalled as he is not in possession. 2. On hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, the first sentence in 2 para 2 stands modified as follows. “The appellant claims to be in possession of the suit land admeasuring 6 Hectares 31 Ares.” The copy of the modified order be issued. However, after hearing the learned Counsel, I do not find anything to recall that order. The said order was passed after hearing the Counsel of both the parties and this Court had put certain conditions to protect the interest of the respondent also. 3. Subject to the above modification, the Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)