^- ^k tl^CII ^ 3 [1 'yi -A^ -3.- IN THE HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. 32-6^ /2005 PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS ^ Vikas Puri, S/o Raj Kumar Puri Aged about 18 years R/o. Village Birmi Pali P.0. Birnii Pali Bararakela Tahsil Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 3. 4. ..—L..____ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Departraent of Education Mantralay D.K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer Baramkela, Raigarh (C.G.) C.E.O. Janpad Panchayat Bararakela, Raigarh (C.G.) State ofM.P. Through Secretary, Departnient of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) Union of India Through Secretary Department ofPublic Grievances New Delhi WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA 5. 6. 44 XI-HC 22 -S^ ^TFn^T, ^?rTO7re, f^TRFp: •qrqc'TT ^F^Tf^ ? 3?R^][ ^^^ ^~^-f^^ 3a^^oor "^ 200 ^•^y' 3TIc^ ^I K-ii^ 3:H??T ^TRW^rficT <:k t- 3T^?[ ?7?TT^R W^~d '^F?t^pfH'?TirK:ff"? fsTZT -^ •3-rf^T ^TT^T 21-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri ^ - >S. TKjiJ^Lt^f Advocate. Shri P.S. Koshy, Dy. Adv. Generatj forthe State. Heard. This case relates to compassionafe appointment consequent upon the death of an employee sen/ing in the State. Learned counset for the petitioner the empfoyee has occurred on or after 1 -' categoricatty stated that in this case, the death of 1-1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing W.P. No. 1322/2p02 invotving the same question orders-have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He j^rays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. Learned counsel for the State doed of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision emptoyees who died on or after 1/11/199"] that time. In view of the submissions madj without expressing any opinion on the mej not dispute the above fact and state that the State :o consider the cases of dependants of those strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at by tearned counset appearing for the parties, its of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of Justice will be ser^ed if a direction is giv^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to eonsider and decide the cqise of the petitioner in accordance with the poticy prevalent at the time of death of the em^toyee concemed. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders will be issued as ear|y as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The petitioner is also directed to render due cc|-operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if any gnevance stilt remains, the petition^r may avail the remecty available under the law including fiting ofthe petition before this Cjourt. With the aforesaid obsen/ations. tllis petition stands dlsposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel. who jwill be obliged to communicate the order to the respondents forcompliance. k Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^^€^ MM^it^^. •^s^