IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8756 of 2005 1. ARVINDA KUMAR, son of Sri Shiwajee Singh, resident of village – Yadawan, P.O. Akoriha Gola, P S. Akoriha Gola, District – Rohtas. 2. Sanjay Kumar Singh, son of Ravindra Nath Singh, resident of village – Yadawan, P.O. Akoriha Gola, District – Rohtas. 3. Vijay Kumar Gupta, son of Sri Jagdish Prasad Gupta, resident of Mohalla – New Area Jora Mandir, P S – Dehri-on-sone, District- Rohtas. 4. Anil Kumar son of Sri Ras Bihari Singh, resident of Santi Bhawan,(near G T Road) Subashnagar, P.O. – Dalmiyanagar, District – Rohtas. 5. Sanjeev Kumar Lal, son of Sri Ras Bihari Singh, resident of Santi Bhawan,(near G T Road) Subashnagar, P.O. – Dalmiyanagar, District – Rohtas. 6. Vinod Kumar, son of Kedar Prasad, resident of Kumar Medical Hall, At + PO – Nasariganj, District – Rohtas. 7. Rajesh Kumar son of Sri Hemant Prasad Singh, resident of village – Medinipur, Via – Nasariganj, District – Rohtas. 8. Brajesh Kumar Singh son of Sri Mahendra Prasad Singh, resident of village – Sikariyan, P.S. Nasariganj, District – Rohtas. 9. Bhudeo Kumar Singh, son of Sri Dharmraj Singh, resident of village – Dehri-on-sone, New Area (Jorna Mandir) Post - Dalmianagar, District – Rohtas. 10. Vinod Kumar Singh son of Ram Prawash Singh, resident of village – Bagha Khan, P.O. Tetrah, District – Rohtas. 11. Ajit Kumar Singh, son of late Brahma Singh, resident of village- Yadawan, P.O. Akorih Gola, District – Rohtas. 12. Dinesh Kumar, son of Sita Ram Singh, resident of village-Ram Dihra Bigha, P.O. Ram Dihra, District – Rohtas. 13. Anuj Kumar Singh, son of late Brahma Singh, resident of Yadawan, P.O. Akorih Gola, District – Rohtas. 14. Arun Kumar, son of Sri Suraj Nath Saksena, resident of Opp. To Ustav Bhawan, North Lane, Pink Color House, West Mohan Bigha, P.O. Dalmiyanagar, District – Rohtas. 15. Manoj Kumar, son of Surendra Prasad Singh, resident of near Jag Jeewan Sewa Ashram, Dhan Purya, Sasaram. 16. Sanjay Kumar Singh, son of Sri Hari Narayan Singh, resident of village Tornj, P S – Shivsagar, Distt. Rohtas. 17. Deepak Kumar Keshari, son of Sri Banarasi Pd. Keshari, resident of Chitradhar Dharamshala Road, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 18. Santosh Kumar, son of Shiv Shankar Prasad, resident of village – Adamapur, P.O. Torni, Via – Shivsagar, District – Rohtas. 19. Rajesh Kumar Singh, son of Kailash Prasad Singh, resident of village –Hatani, P.O. Hatani, P.S. Jokha, District – Rohtas. 20. Deo Brat Kumar, son of Ram Nihora Singh, resident of village – Tendua, P.O. Nonsari, Via – Garh Nokha, district – Rohtas. 21. Ajay Kumar Singh, son of Sri Jamuna Singh, resident of Room No.24, Dak Bungla Market Kochas, P.O. Kochas, District – Rohtas. 2 22. Ashok Kumar Singh, son of late Sardar Singh, resident of village – Pandwalia, P.O. Barki Mahuli, District – Rohtas. 23. Ajit Pratap Singh, son of Shri Lal Bihari Singh, resident of village – Jadwan, P.O. Akorhi Gola, P.S. Akorhi Gola, District – Rohtas. 24. Indra Mani Chaubey, son of Jamuna Chaubey, resident of village – Meema, P.O. Biseni Kala, District – Rohtas. ________ Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. ----------- For the petitioners: M/S. Rajendra Prasad Singh. Sr. Advocate and Rajeev Kumar Singh. For the State : Mr. Kumar Alok., SC 19 and Mr. Rakesh umar, AC to SC 19. -- ---- 03. 01.09.2010 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners want a direction upon the respondents to appoint them on the post of Village Level Worker/Village Extension Worker in the district of Sasaram at Rohtas under the given pay-scale in light of so-called decision taken on 6.4.1988. Stand of the State is that as a policy decision no appointments are being made on the post in the State of Bihar for many a reasons. As and when decision is taken to make appointment on the post, the claim of these petitioners will be considered on their own merit and no special circumstance exists for issuance of direction specially in favour of these petitioners when appointment has to be made across the State in terms of decision which is required to be made by the respondent State in this regard taking many a circumstances into consideration since 1988. 3 The writ application stands disposed of with the observation that the claim of the petitioners would be considered as and when process of filling up the post of VLW/VEW is taken up by the State. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)