(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 11267 OF 2010 Pradeep s/o. Kalyani Antredi, Age : 32 years, Occupation : Service as Clerk-Typist, R/o. Murum, Taluka : Omerga, District : Osmanabad. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary (Industries), Govt. of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, M.I.D.C., "Udyog Sarthi", Marol Industrial Area, Andheri (East), Mumbai-93. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. A.G. Kanade, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate, for respondent no.2. ........................ (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 22ND DECEMBER 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per R.M. Borde, J.) : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of parties. 2. The facts in the instant petition are identical with the facts of a decided matter i.e. Writ Petition No. 4384/2008. Writ Petition No. 4384/2008 has been allowed by the Division Bench of this Court, vide judgment and order dated 7th October 2009. For the reasons recorded, while allowing Writ Petition No. 4384/2008, the instant petition also deserves to be allowed. 3. In the result, the petition is allowed, in terms of paragraph 9 of the judgment delivered in Writ Petition No. 4384/2008. The respondent no.2 Corporation is directed to confirm the services of the petitioner from the date on which he has successfully completed his probation period and grant him all benefits consequential to such confirmation. (3) 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. ( R.M. BORDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp11267