Petitiorser ResooticSents ;MiQH_©OURT-OFGHHATTISCSftRH^BiLASPUR , . . ' 11' ' . 1;;:' WritPetitJon fS)N6.^Q34of2008 j Smt Kanti Sharma, VWo. i-ate Ashok Sharmai, Aged about 3(3 years, R/o. Shantjnagar Ward, -jagdaipur,^ Disthct Bastar(CG). Versys -• ..;.•!..,. • .. • ;.' - 1) Stafe of Chhattisgarii, through the Seoretary, S.T. S.C, & ITriba! Deyelopment Department, D.K.S. Bhawaq, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG). 'l '" . •' ,:.' ^•"; '-;" ?'-i '• ^ ^, ;-•••.•..•. 2) The Comrpissi^ner, Trlbaf Devejoprrient^^^R^ 3) The Coliector, District Dantewada (CG). 4) The. Assjstant Commi^joner, Tribai Deve!opment Dantewada, Distriot Dante^^da 5) Accountant Qenerai, Pagariya Complex, Raipur (Writ Petition under Artscie 226 of the Constitution of jndla) SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Satish K. Agnilliotri, J. Presesit: ' Shri Ashok Shukia, counsei for ttie petifioner 1 Shri Y.S. Thakur^ Dy.'Adwcate General for the State... ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28th dayofJuiy, 2008) s . '• With consent of iearned counsel appeanng for the parties, the matter is heardfinafiy. ; I : 2) This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retiral dues. • 3) Thi? Court, in the matter pf W.P.NO.4642^004 (Baynath I Mandai Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) ancj ather connected matters, direoted the Committee to consider the m^ter of retriai dues asthe disputed jquestion of iacts were invoived. The Committee was constjtuted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed 'in W.P.No. 1961 ^006 i(Smt.Ke|aBai; C^handrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgsrh and otnefs), and crder dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarti and others . Vs. Baijnath SViandaS and another). Thus, this petitson ls;squareiy covered bythe '*;k, \ „ ^ judgment and order dated 31si January,2008 passed inW.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baljnath Mandai (supra) } as submitted by iearned oounsei appearing for the parties. ; •• ,. ' • " ; ;.. : ' -— : . '; i: 4) This petition is accordingiy disposed pf in the same terms Le., the ofrice of the Advocate General is directed to send the! case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from tne 'date of receipt of a copy of thi3 order. Thereafter, the Committee shali issue notice to the petltioner, offlcers conojerned and respondent No.4 within a further period of 15 days. Ttie Committee shatl consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunlty of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may Tiie^addltional documents, if necessary. The.entire exercise, inoiuding payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner, be compieted 'within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copyof this order. ' | 5) The petltioner shaii supply one compiete set of the petition fo the State counsel for transferring the same to the Commlttee. j 6) In oase of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessaiy to fiie a writ pefcition befbre this Court directiy. The representation/applicaticn can be moVed before the,Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shaii not refuse to entertain the representation/application,ifsofileddirectiy. _—- 1 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i Raju":