IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA. CWP No. 2026 of 2011. Decided on: 26th July, 2011. Phool Maya ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. B. S. Attri, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Sanjay Karol.J. (Oral) Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or other writ order or direction quashing the impugned order (Annexure P-6) dated 11.11.2010 and (Annexure P-8) dated 22.3.2011 being violative of the provisions of the Constitution of India. ii) Directions may be issued to the respondents to reinstate the services of the petitioner at the same place forthwtih.” 2. Annexure P-6 reads as under:- “Show Cause Notice That while working as Beldar in Kullu Division No.II Smt. Full Maya had produced a Certificate issued by Sub Divisional Magistrate Manali (C) No. Nil dated 5-02-2007 and 2 confirmed by Sub Divisional Magistrate Manali, which later was found fake as per report of the Sub Divisional Magistrate Manali (C) receipt vide letter No.1589 dated 30-10-2010. Smt. Full Maya has failed to maintain absolute devotion to duty by producing fake Certificate and rendered herself liable for displinary (sic) action under Rule 14 CCS rules 1965. That Smt. Full Maya is hereby directed to submit her written statement within 10 days of receipt of this Show cause notice in her defence & also to whether she desired to be heard in person. Sd/- Executive Engineer, Dated: 11-11-2010 Kullu Division No.II Kullu HPPWD, Kullu. No.PW/KD-II/EA-III/2010 14333 Dated:18-11-10 Miss. Full Maya W/O Sh. Jai Bahadur, Village Sial, P.O. Manali, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu (HP) Sd/- Executive Engineer, Kullu Division No.II HPPWD, Kullu.” 3. Annexure P-8 is the order terminating the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 22nd March, 2011 for the reason mentioned in Annexure P-6. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record. 5. Report of the Sub Divisional Magistrate Manali (C), as mentioned in Annexure P-6, on the basis of which show cause notice was issued is not available on record. How and on what basis, after a period of more 3 than 2½ years did the Sub Divisional Magistrate come to the conclusion that the certificate produced by the petitioner is fake is also not evident from record. 6. Be that as it may be, the Engineer-in-Chief has now filed his affidavit dated 26.6.2011, stating that order of termination (Annexure P-8) stands revoked by respondent No.3 vide order dated 30.4.2011 (Annexure E). Not only that it is also evident that all service benefits stand disbursed to the petitioner. 7. As such, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive any longer and the present petition is disposed off accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th July, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.