IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933 AS.No. 653 of 1996() -------------------------- OS.28/1990 of SUB COURT, SULTHAN BATHERY .................... APPELLANT(S):DEFENDANT NO.3 --------------------------------------- MULLANGAL GOVINDAN NAMBEESAN, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT PANAMKUTTY HOUSE, KELLOOR P.O., MANANTHAVADY. BY ADVS. SRI.T.KARUNAKARAN NAMBIAR SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):PLAINTIFFS 1 & 2/DEFENDANTS 2 AND 4 TO 9 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PADINHARATH VANAJA, D/O.PANTHEERADI BALAKRISHNAN NAMBEESAN, AGED 31 YEARS, PREUNNANOOR AMSOM, KARRINGARI DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK. 2. PADINHARATH VIPIN, AGED 2 ¾ YEARS (MINOR), S/O.GOVINDAN NAMBEESAN(REPRESENTED BY MOTHER VANAJA) 3. M.RAJAN NAMBEESAN, S/O.KESAVAN NAMBEESAN, AGED 30 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, PERUNNANOOR AMSOM, KANNAGARI DESOM, TARUVANA P.O. 4. E.K.MADHAVAN NAIR, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.APPU NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT KARIM CHADA, PERUNNANOOR AMSOM, KARINGAR DESOM, TARUVANA P.O. 5. C.V.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 42 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AANANTHAVADY AMSOM, DESOM OF MANANTHAVDY TALUK. 6. M.GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 45 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, PORUNNANOOR AMSOM, KARINGARI DESOM, SCHOOL MASTER. svs .............2/-... ...2... A.S.NO.653/1996 7. M.DEVAKI AMMA, AGED 73, W/O.KESAVAN NAMBEESAN, SWASTHAM, RESIDING AT PANAMKUTTY VEEDU. 8. M.CHANDRAN NAMBEESAN, S/O.DEVAKI AMMA, AGED 41 YEARS, K.S.R.T.C. CONDUCTOR, RESIDING AT PANANKUTTY VEEDU. 9. M.NANDINI, AGED 37 YEARS, SWASTHAM,RESIDING AT PANAMKUTTY VEEDU. R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.P.T.ABRAHAM SRI.JOSE PALLATHUKARAN SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM SRI.REGI C.P. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs ORDER ON C.M.P. NO.5594/1996 IN A.S. NO.653/1996 DISMISSED 25/05/2011 SD/- HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ A.S.No.653 Of 1996 ---------------------- Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011. J U D G M E N T This Court by order dated 3.4.2009 ordered that if no steps are taken within three weeks, the appeal will stand dismissed without further orders. The appellant failed to take steps for completing service of notice. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for default. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-