IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25503 of 2009 YADOLAL SAHNI, SON OF RIJHAN SAHNI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE REHUA, POLICE STATION MADHUBAN, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.3.2010. Heard Mr. Ramadya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Runisaidpur P.S. Case No.161 of 2006 for the offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Explosive Substance Act. While pressing prayer for bail, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some accused persons having similar allegations have already been granted bail. He has referred Annexure-2 to the petition, which is order dated 12.3.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.4853 of 2008 and also refers paragraph-13 of the petition wherein he has stated that accused Ruplal Sahni and Dilip Sahni have been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No.55637 of 2006 and Cr. Misc. No.38085 of 2007 respectively. On these grounds, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of - 2 - N.H./ bail. However, so far as the case of the petitioner is concerned, it appears that same is not on the similar footing to that of the co-accused, who have been granted bail. In this case, the looted gun was recovered from possession of the petitioner and as such I do not find any merit in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petitioner is in custody since 21.9.2006. However, this petitioner was remanded in this case on 16.3.2009. In this case, the petitioner is in custody since 16.3.2009. Accordingly, I do no find any merit in this case. Prayer for bail is rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)