THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 655 of 2003 Dated 27-01-2011 Between: P. Jagan Mohan Prasad …Petitioner Vs. The Chairman & Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh. Power Generation Corporation, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 655 of 2003 Oral order: The petitioner is aggrieved that his case for appointment as an Assistant Engineer either in the Andhra Pradesh Generation Corporation (for short ‘AP Genco’) or Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation (for short ‘AP Transco’) was not considered by the respondents despite his eligibility under the “displaced persons” quota. It requires to be noticed that the petitioner has neither impleaded the AP Genco nor the AP Transco, but is rest content to implead the Chairman and Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation, Hyderabad; the Chairman and Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation, apart from the Executive Engineer, (Operations and Maintenance), Penna Ahobhilam Reservoir Hydro Electric Scheme, PABRHES, Anantapur. The petitioner claims to be a graduate in Engineering in the discipline of Electrical and Electronics Applications. He also acquired certain qualifications in Computer Education. Pursuant to a family partition, he became the owner of Ac.05-00 agricultural land which was acquired for the PABR project foreshore submersion. Compensation for the acquired property is admittedly paid but according to the petitioner was very meagre. He made several representations to the respondents to consider his appointment as an Assistant Engineer either in the AP Transco, in the Electrical Inspectorate or the AP Genco, under the displaced persons quota. There being no response, he filed the writ petition. He also pleads to have submitted a representation to the Hon’ble Chief Minister which was endorsed by the Minister for Energy, Coal and Boilers on 17-04-2000 and forwarded to the respondents for appropriate action. Even so, since nothing happened, he is before this Court. There is no pleading whatsoever in the affidavit accompanying the writ petition as to whether there is any extant scheme for appointment of persons who are displaced from property on account of the acquisition of land for the purpose either in AP Genco or AP Transco. No legal entitlement for appointment under the displaced persons quota is pleaded in the writ petition nor any instrument brought to the notice of this Court whereby and whereunder the petitioner is entitled to exclusive consideration for employment in the public instrumentality on the ground of having been displaced from property which was acquired for the purposes of the public corporation and for which compensation is paid and received. The petitioner has also not chosen to implead either the AP Genco or AP Transco. For all the aforesaid reasons, there are no merits in the writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. No costs. JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 27-01-2011. Pvks