^ ^ r^ IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISINO. :?3ZQ /2009 PETITIONBRS •^^ ^•••^.. •^N/" ./ ^Si^ ^••j^\y.y' .''".^'^••' ^\" ^>' ^%/- ^y RESPONDENTS t^ / 1. Bande Panna, S/o Late Sudhu Panna, aged about 43 years, working as Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Pakari Kachhar, Block - Kunkuri, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Smt. Claret Ekka, W/o Anil Ekka, aged about 35 years, working as Head Master, attached on Primary School- Sukbasupara, Kunkuri, Distt. - Jashpur (C.G.) VBRSUS ^" : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :-The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ' Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur , (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block -Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) H. ^ ^- "71^, 3^>^f- Ty^-^-^ ^Ffr'z^y TreaQUiy, Account & Pension Jashpur, (C.G.) Distt.-Jashpur WmTPETITION UNDBRARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH ATBiLASPUR WRIT PETITiON (S) No. 7320 of 2009 PETITiONERS RESPONDENTS Bande Panna & another. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITiON UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDiA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satlsh K. Aanihota^J, Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pane! Lawyer for the State. 4. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 16th day of December, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finaily. 2. At the very outset, learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that this petition is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257 of 2008 {Safil Kant Singh v. State of Chhatts'sgarh & Othef^} and prays that simliar reiief may be granted In case ot the present pet'rtioners aiso. 3. At thls juncture, iearned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event the petitioners submit a detailed representation; the same shali be considered and decided in accordance with law and in vlew of the dectslon of this Court rendered in Sali! Kant S//?^/? (supra), subject to verification of the facts. In view of foregoing, according to iearned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothlng survives for adjudication. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit