1 CAW 560/11 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.560 of 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4568 of 2010 Margarate Mary Pereira And Ors. .. Applicants versus Shri Haji M.C.Abdul Kadar & Anr ... Respondents ... Mr.P.R. Naidu for the applicants Mr. Sameer Bhalekar for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th March 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The prayer clause in the application says that the applicant is seeking clarification as to the phrase “that the result of the suit would ofcourse be subject to the final result of the writ petition”. In my view, the meaning in the phrase is clear and requires no further clarification. What is sought to be argued now is in the nature of a review of the order declining interim relief passed by this court. I am afraid that review is not an appropriate remedy. If the applicant is aggrieved by the order refusing interim relief, appropriate remedy for him is to file an appeal. Civil Application is accordingly rejected. (D.G.KARNIK, J)