IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4415 of 2009(A) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- PREETHA RAJ, KAIPUZHAVILA VEEDU, MAYYUVANADU P.O., KOLLAM. BY MR.G.PRABHAKARAN, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM. BY MR. P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.4415 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 11th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that he has made an application for renewal of the regular permit in respect of his stage carriage bearing Regn.No.KL-10/E-9187. Referring to Ext.P1, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that though his application came up for consideration of the 1st respondent on 05/12/2008, the same was adjourned indefinitely. It is stated that thereafter, the matter was not considered. It is in these circumstances, the writ petition is filed seeking an order directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on his application for renewal of permit. 2. Having regard to the above grievance, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the application made by the petitioner for renewal of his permit is still pending, the 1st respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg