IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2007 Siemens Limited & others.... Petitioner versus Siemens workers union,Thane (E)..... Respondents. Shri P.K.Lele with P.N. Anaokar for the petitioner M/s. M.M.Legal for Respondent no.2. Mr. C.U.Singh with Raviondra Nair i/b. M/s. Doijode Associates for Respondent no.1. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 26TH APRIL, 2007 DATED; 26TH APRIL, 2007 DATED; 26TH APRIL, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. An interlocutory order passed by the Industrial court dated 30th March 2007 is challenged by the petitioner by filing the present writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the contentions raised by the petitioner before the Industrial court more so in relation to the practice in avoiding to have a sandwitch working day as it results in more absentism, has not been considered by the Industrial court. It thus appear that the submissions made by the petitioner are not properly dealt with by the Industrial court. However, there is no need to interfere with the said order as I am proposing to direct the Industrial court to decide the main complaint itself before 30-9-2007. As of now under the order passed by the Industrial court, 30-4-2007 is to be a working day. Though I declined to interfere with the interlocacutory order, in the facts of the present case, I deem it appropriate to direct the Industrial court to decide the main complaint by the end of August 2007, uninfluenced by the observations made by it in the inmpugned order. Both the parties assured co-operation for the expedited hearing of the matter. In the result, the writ petition is summarily dismissed. ...