1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1515 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1522 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Sonhira Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Respondent. AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1518 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1520 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Hutatmakisan Ahir Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH JUNE, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that so far as question (a) to (g) are concerned, the same is covered by the judgment of this Court in the 2 case of CIT V/s. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. reported in [2008] 301 I.T.R. 191. 2. So far question (h) is concerned, the same is covered by the judgment delivered by this Court on 30th June, 2009 in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kisanveer Satara Sakar Karkhana Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.930 of 2008. 3. In this view of the matter, all the appeals are liable to be dismissed for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)