[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 515/2001 RAMESH CHANDRA & ANR. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. DATE: 23.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Mukesh Saini for Mr. Biri Singh for the accused-petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 29.05.2001 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Jhalawar in Criminal Appeal No. 45/1996, whereby the Appellate Court has upheld the judgment dated 03.01.96 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) & Judicial Magistrate, Khanpur in Criminal Complaint No. 121/88, by which the trial Court convicted the accused-petitioners for the offence under Sections 494 and 494/109 IPC, but instead of sentence, granted them the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and also directed the petitioners to pay Rs. 1,500/- each to the complainant as compensation under Section 5(1)(a) of the Probation of Offenders Act. I have heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for [2] the State and have also carefully gone through the impugned judgments dated 03.01.96 and 29.05.2001 passed by the trial Court and Appellate Court respectively. Both the Courts below have given concurrent findings and the trial Court has rightly exercised its discretion in granting the benefit of probation to the accused-petitioners and the same has been upheld by the Appellate Court vide impugned judgment dated 29.05.2001. In the considered view of this Court, the impugned judgments passed by both the Courts below require no interference as there is no illegality or error in the same. Consequently, the criminal revision petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/