IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11633 of 2008 DAYADEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.5.2008 Heard. The petitioner who is mother- in - law is an accused in a case under sections 498, 304(B) and 201/34 of the I.P.C. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was earlier withdrawn by the learned counsel on vide order dated 5.12.2006 passed in Cr.Misc. No.500020/06. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to that the father-in-law, Jagdish Sahani, and Manoj Sahani, husband of the deceased, have been granted regular bail by another bench of this Court vide Annexure-5 series . Learned counsel submits that at the time of granting regular bail this Court noticed the petition submitted before the Superintendent of police and also before court below that the deceased died of Diarrhoea. Learned counsel submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that sisters –in – law have been allowed anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court. In the circumstances I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Her prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner, Daya Devi , surrenders before the court below and pray for regular bail the same would be disposed of preferably on the same day also taking into consideration the 2 submissions noted above. Anil Kr. Sinha (S. P. Singh, J.)