IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 52064-M of 2007. Date of decision:-29.04.2008. Nasru and another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that admittedly the daughter of the complainant was missing since April 2006. No complaint for the same was recorded before any authority. She was recovered on July 25, 2006. The FIR was registered on July 28, 2006. Even in that FIR there was no allegation against the petitioners. During investigation by the police, they were found innocent. However, in application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. they were summoned. The petitioner No.1's son, namely Mubarik @ Timani, who had in fact married with the prosecutrix, is in custody. The petitioners are also in custody since October 27, 2007. The prosecutrix remained with the son of petitioner No.1 and the petitioners allegedly for about three months but no hue and cry was raised. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that pending trial the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon. 29th April, 2008. (RAJESH BINDAL) asija JUDGE