1 cao114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (St.) NO. 19984 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1182 OF 2001 The State of Maharashtra. ... ... Applicant. Versus Babu Barkaya Gondhali & Ors.. ... ... Respondents. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, AGP for the Applicant. Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar for the Respondents. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2010. P. C. : Mentioned. Not on Board. By consent, taken on board along with the companion matter. 2. This civil application is for adding additional grounds in the memo of appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, in the interest of justice, the application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today, failing which this order to stand recalled and the civil application to stand dismissed without any further reference to the Court. 2 cao114 3. Civil application is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) 3 cao114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2010 IN CROSS OBJECTION (ST.) NO. 15937 OF 2010 ON FIRST APPEAL NO. 1182 OF 2001 Babu Barkya Gondhali & Ors. ... ... Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... ... Respondent. Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar for the Applicant. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, AGP for the Respondent. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. 114A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2010. P. C. : By the present application, the applicants pray for condoning the delay in filing the cross objection. Since the delay in filing appeal by the respondent herein is condoned, we are inclined to allow this application also. Accordingly, this civil application is allowed. Civil application disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) 4 cao114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1182 OF 2001 WITH CROSS OBJECTGION (ST.) NO. 15937 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1882 OF 2001 The State of Maharashtra. ... ... Applicant. Versus Babu Barkaya Gondhali & Ors.. ... ... Respondents. Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, AGP for the Applicant. Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar for the Respondents. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2010. P. C. : Heard. Admit. 2. The requirement of printing of paper-book is dispensed with on condition that the Appellants shall file Additional paper-book consisting of all the relevant pleadings, evidence and documents which were before the Lower Court and are likely to be relied upon by either side during the arguments. The documents to be filed shall be supported by affidavit to the effect that the same were the part of record before the lower court. 5 cao114 That be done within twelve weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. As soon as the paper-book is filed, the Appeal be proceeded, provided, there is no other office objection, and it be included in the final hearing list as per its turn. Filing of separate paper book in the Cross Objection is dispensed with as the documents in both the matters will be the same. Sd/- Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)