IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17927 of 2008 AFSHAN BANO …..Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Md. Shamsher @ Jamil ….Opposite parties ----------- 3. 23.12.2008. This application is for cancellation of bail so granted to opposite party no. 2 vide order dated 10.4.2007 passed by Additional Session Judge VIII Patna in B. P. No. 1685 of 2007. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the opposite party. It appears from the record that the petitioner against the order dated 10.4.2007 filed a petition for cancellation of bail before the trial court i.e. SDJM, Patna which was rejected vide order dated 10.10.2007. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a poor helpless lady. Opposite party no. 2 who is the husband of the petitioner always threatens her and he also interferes with the course of trial threatening the witnesses of the petitioner. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the petitioner is a resident of District Patna whereas the opposite party no. 2 is a resident of Sasaram. The case is also pending in the court of SDJM, Patna. It is further submitted that this application for cancellation of bail has been filed in order to harass the opposite party. He is still ready to keep the petitioner but she is not willing to live with him. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and circumstances as well as the grounds mentioned in the order granting bail to the opposite party no. 2, I am not inclined to cancel the bail so granted to opposite party no. 2. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, opposite party no. 2 is directed to fully co-operate in early dispose of the case and shall not make any interference in the examination of the witness. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)