IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11532 of 2010 PHOOL KHAN, SON OF MOBIN KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-RATAN, P.S. GOGARI, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA. ……………………………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Sahin Begam, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 30.6.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 364, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prayer of the petitioner for bail had already been rejected earlier vide order dated 6.10.2009 passed in Criminal Misc. No.21168 of 2009 (Annexure-‘1’ to this application) at that stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had been made accused on the basis of his own confessional statement and the main assailant of the deceased is co-accused, Pyare Khan even according to the confessional 2 statement and protest petition filed by the informant. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that on the basis of the confessional statement of this petitioner, the dead body of the deceased was recovered supporting the manner of occurrence as described in his confessional statement. However, it is also submitted that the bail application of this petitioner was dismissed at that stage and there has been no change in the stage as the charges are yet to be framed. Perused the report, kept at flat ‘X’. The prayer of the petitioner had already been rejected on merits considering the facts and circumstances of the case vide order dated 6.10.2009 passed in Criminal Misc. No.21168 of 2009 (Annexure-‘1’ to this application). No fresh ground could be raised for grant of bail at this stage. As a result, this application is dismissed at this stage. However, the court concerned shall take every step for expeditious hearing of this case on the issue of framing of charge. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)