1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6107 OF 2008 Smt.Vidya Patankar .. Petitioner Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation .. Respondents Mr.K.K.Malpathak for petitioner Mr.G.S.Hegde i/b. M/s.G.S.Hegde & Associates for respondents. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ. & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 10th September 2008 P.C. . Counsel for respondent submits that the petitioner has not paid requisite payment of Rs.1,99,716/- upto March 2008 and even for that reason the proposal submitted has not been considered by the Competent Authority. 2. However, learned Counsel for petitioner disputes this fact and states that petitioner has 2 submitted second proposal on 24th March 2008 and had also paid a sum of Rs.18,000/- and odd. He further makes a grievance that even this proposal has not been decided. 3. According to us, these are the disputes for which it is not necessary for us to go into in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The petitioner is at liberty to get in touch with the authorities concerned and pay the amount due in accordance with law within two weeks from today. Upon such payment, the proposal dated 24th March 2008 will be considered by the Authorities concerned in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today and the petitioner will be intimated about the decision. The petition is disposed of. No costs. ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) 3 (A.P.Deshpande, J).