BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.13122 of 2011 KARUNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERIYAKULAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.245/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.P.RATHINAM ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.RAMAR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC.438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner, who has been arrayed as an accused, in Crime No.245/2011 on the file of the respondent police registered for the offence under Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, has filed this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and a false has been foisted against him under Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along with others, pelted stones on a State owned Transport Corporation Bus and caused damage to the tune of Rs.4,500/-. Hence the counsel prays for enlargement of the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional public Prosecutor would submit that because of the Paramakudi incidence, the present occurrence has been taken place, in which the petitioner and other accused had pelted stones on a Government owned Transport Corporation Bus and caused damage to the vehicle, which is assessed at Rs.4,500/-. He would further submit that the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this petition. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by the counsel on either side and considering the fact that because of the Paramakudi incidence which took place on 11.09.2011, the alleged occurrence has taken place on 14.09.2011, in which damage to the extent of Rs.4,500/- has been caused to the bus belonged to the State owned Transport Corporation bus and further the investigation in the case is considerably over, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate, Periyakulam, on depositing a sum of Rs.4,500/-[Rupees four thousand five hundred only] to the credit of Crime No.245 of 2011 and also on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, Periyakulam, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the same Magistrate daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYAKULAM. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERIYAKULAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. P.RATHINAM ADVOCATE SR.NO.34129. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13122 of 2011 Date :29/09/2011 2P/6C RPB : 30.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/