^l >.iii-B?'i /''^-?:V^;'T'''A^-^^ '^y.^~»'^-^^'s''!i*--J!'-.S, /- ,^-^y^^-.*Tbr^v- r-.^.^ p ^ <^. 'F-' IN_'IHE_HIGHCOURT_OF JUDICaTURE AT BILASPUR _(CG) 1 WRIT .PETITION NO.lPSC/2001 PETITIONER suryakant shukla, age3% years^' ! S/o. Shri Kasi Prasad shukla ] | R/o. New BUS sfcand, Pandrltaraa.l Distriefe - Raipur (cfthattlsgarh).; VERSUS RESPONDENTS s l)-u,/The Sfeate of (3-ihattisgarh, Thrbugh ; prlnciple secretary, Mantralaya. D.K. diawan, Ralpur. 2) The Municipal corporation Through & commissloner Municipal corporation Raipur Raipur (chhattisgarh). rA^-1 i^S-^, J^ . 'ffle Adaitional Tahsildar an<3 •••' <A\^"" ^^ .~-:..^,ty) ^••^^"-^'^S£?M& ,.•.-'0'* ^^~''<>t'f~ —^.^As?^ 0-^'1-V (Caiial) SSpufcy 6o*3?eefeB^, Wafcer Management Divlsion N0.1 Raipgy (Chh att.tsgarh)» ^^' 6i><°' ____,':_: ^' S^MU PSTITION •UNDER AR'nC&BS 122®/227PEWEGCMSTITUTXON pr INDIA. HK3H eOUKT OFCHHArHSOAKH AT BaASFUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmCHSr No. 1(B6 o£2001 :SuryakaBtSliukla. .. VERSUS , ' : TheStatftofGlihattisgarii &£)thers. Amit PETmON UNDERARTICl£226/22fOEaHE.G0NSTHXmONOEINDIA :SBSHm^ i9^i8aiHs»r^^>miUBtFl.^.;';-:-»:- Present: SfariVivekRath(M^Advocate4wthftpetitionfir..-, Shri P.K.Bhadun, Pandl.,awyerior^8t^. $ SImKasKifShakeel,.Advocate;fertiiere^caidentNo.2. ORDER<0»AU --. ^^s^ i (Passed on 28tn day ofAugtKt, 20101 • 1. Leaffled counsel for the petitiofier, on mstruettons, subnuts that since there is aprocess^settIemeHtUetvi^n^t^ Gk)qx>ration, th®petitic)ner mayNp^ with liblertyte 1ake appropriate st^is as {wovided tinder tfae jMw/isionsop faw ortoBMjbe Eq)pUeaticm tojfhe au&Qrities CTmeem^^ the dispute. 2. LearnedccmtiselappearingfiM'Othfirsidehayenoobjection. ., 3. It isordered aecOTdu^ly. •y .' ' '. ••.."•••\- ' . . .'..•--'•.• '• ".--"• ;" . :: •' • . : ••:. : '.••: -" •• ^ C Consequently, thfi wnt petitio& is dismissed as •sralhdrami ^itfc the afbrestated liberty, ifso a<lYised. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge