THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5238 of 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel and at their request the revision itself is taken up for disposal. The petitioner, who is the 4th defendant, seeks to assail the order rejecting an application filed under Order 20 Rule 11 (2) of C.P.C seeking for monthly installments. The Court below dismissed the said application mainly on the ground that there is no such consent on the part of the respondent herein. Hence, the revision. Having considered the submissions and on perusal of the material and especially in view of absence of any such consent by the respondent herein, this Court do not find any reason to interfere with. There are no merits in the revision. The revision is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J 06th November, 2009. grk THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5238 of 2009 Dated: 6th November, 2009