THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.1302 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.7067 of 2009 stating that the representation made by him on 05.03.2009 for appointment of Joint Muthawalli along with the second respondent for Dargah Hazrath Syed Baba Fakruddin was not considered. The Writ Petition was disposed of on 06.04.2009, directing the first respondent to examine the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders within two {2} months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the orders passed by this Court were not complied with. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Wakf Board for the respondent. It is no doubt true that there was some delay on the part of the first respondent in complying with the orders of this Court. The fact, however, remains that through Memo in F.No.B3/04/ATP/2006/Z-V, dated 08.12.2009; the first respondent rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner did not submit any documents in support of his claim. It is also mentioned that the Wakf Board does not provide appointment of Joint Muthawalli. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the memo, he has to seek remedies before appropriate Forum. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies, vis-à-vis, memo, dated 08.12.2009. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 12th July 2010 RRB