_^s_ ^' t bA A .*"^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR fC.G.) M.A. (a ^S'^ /2008 3 APPELLANTS CLAIMANTS ."^ ..'•"... ^ ^'A\ - ^••^ - ^,.-\ ^^ •^^ ^^L<*' •^r' RESPONDENTS : NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENT CLAIMANT 1. Rani Te\'var Wd/o late Rajendram Tewar, aged about 30 years. 2. Ku. Manikan Durga D/o lat^e Rajendram ' Tewar aged about 12 years. 3. Kashumayan 7'ewar S/o late Rajendram ^ Tewar, agea bout 10 years 4. Kanayan Tewar S/o late Rajendram Tewar, ^- aged about 07 years 5. Jai Durga Tewar S/o tate Rajendram Tewar, . aged about 05 years 6. Maailchami Tewar S/o tate Rajendram Tewar, aged about 03 years. No. 2 to^ are minor through : naturat guardian Mother Rani Tewar Wd/o late Rajendram Tewar. Alt Perrnanent R/o Vitlage Mekatabhatti, Tehsil Usalampatti, Distt. Madurai (Tamilnadu). Present Address : Chandrapur, Tehsil Chandrapur, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. Mohd. Jaleel Ahmed S/o Hameed Ahmed, aged about 27 years, Occupation : Driver R/o Supela, Bhilai, Faseed Nagar Chowk, Thana Supela, District Durg (C.G.) 2. Mohd. Ali S/o Mohd. Nasheer (Vehicle Owner) R/o Sindhi Colony, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. The Nev/ India Insurance Company -" Limited, Division Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4. Yamvelcitai W/o Mudtewar, aged 90 years, Permanent R/o Village Mekalabhatti, Tehsil Usalampatti, Distt. Madurai (Tamilnaclu) Present R/o Chandrapur, Tehsil Chandrapur, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 1 Miscellanceous Appeal under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicle Act, 1994 :C—78 3Tlt^I ^T I^TT^ ^^ ^Tt^T ^^N? Gopal '3'sr ^ii^t<n^, yTirl-i-i<t<o, [®K'II<-I^< ^^^.5^/^ HTN^F ^^IT^t 37T^T 'q^7 ('!jeit3^^>) ^Rfor^ 'Rl^f ? ftT^' Tf^TgTC '^"^RR^H^? 3! S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice PrasHant Kumar Mishra 23-6-2010 No one appears for the ap^ellants. No one appears for the re^ pondents. The matter was passec^ over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the a|3pellants. No one appears for the ap^ellants even in the second call. In the circumstance, therje is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the appeal fpr want of prosecution. The miscellaneous appieal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge -^-