IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8765 of 2008. Decided on 13th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Jai Singh. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though he had been working continuously as Bulldozer-operator w.e.f. January, 1973, however, he has been regularized in 2007. As per Annexure R-B, petitioner had worked intermittently w.e.f. 1973 till 1989. However, w.e.f. 1991 onwards, he had completed more than 240 days in each calander year up to 2001. His case has been considered for regularization in 2007 instead of 2001. Since the petitioner has completed ten years continuous service w.e.f. 1991 up to 2001 with more than 240 days in each calander year, his case ought to have been considered for regularization as Bulldozer-operator immediately after completion of ten years service. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization as Bulldozer-operator as per the averments contained in Annexure R-4, i.e., Mandays Chart with all consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. [ (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 13, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 - `