^^"••^a-^ •^:K^ [!s^>' .^VP" XI-HC—78 311^1W R'll'* ^pff sfn^T 'grpNi' Aa t^? 7^-*ii'4iw<<,^B>fl1y'i<», [sKii'yy. ;^'.;s" ww\ *yi+...^^...^^.^......^200^ * sn^T'q??? (^3^*1) wnwaftssii^t PETmONER: RESPONDENTS: 2 '3 it Petition uiider Article 2 Shri Pan'kaj Shrivastava, 4 Slui BIiaskar Pyasi, Paiiell Heard oa I.A. No.2, appUc^tion copy of the order dated 17-2-209 cttl^cf^'1 'HTO?ff ^f l^'^' <Fn^ri< 'SaffinsiA?! Sint. Shukwara Bai, W/o Shri Rath.das, Aged abouf.'oO years, R/'o ViUage Purama, 'Tehsu I-Charsia, Distt. Raigarh, Presenfly working as Sariian.ch Grain Panchayat Puraiiia, TehsQ K&arsia, Distt. Raigarh, ChhattisgaA FVersus- State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Departiaeat of Paachavat and Rural . Development, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Maiitralaya, . Raipur, Cbliattisgarh . DirectQr, Paachayat, Raipiir, Chhattisgarh Collector/Additional CoUector, Raigai-h, Distt. Raigarli, Chhattisgarh B6./227 offhe Constitution ofladiai e Sbri ^L ounsel for the petitioner. Law}rer for fhc State/ respondent' for exeiaption froin filing certttled a -:l«<j»j; r .f -5&'-HC—78 sii^i wft!m? 'OTI 3D^I *t<i°b ^ 'TST •*ll<il<fl<4, ®Ti1'M'16,fs|<?11'M'J,< *<1+ICTI g,^|q,----""---—-•-••—----^;^200 3iAifiii«n(1i?f3^1?) The apulication is allowec filuig certttied copy ofthe order ( Tllis petition is directed aj 18th March, 2009 passed foy 't; wherebv tlie aoplica.tion of f operation of fhe order dated CoUector, Raigarh has beea reje' on the basis of enquity report tlirough SDO reached to the ci belong to ST category and, tlier^ the post of Sarpaach reservei disq'!iaafied the petitioner exero: of the Clihattisgarli Paja.chayal 1993. Leamed counsel for fhe j:| was dulv elected Sarpanch of t1 was-never qiiestioned by way of ST category aad certificate (A: 'been issued bv tlie competent ^ QO jurisdiction to disqualift' the Grsjll Panchavat. He also does| with respect to the caste of the| after passing fhe order, ttie Ad of fhe shove order ti!l 20th • | <fii<ii<rt<ni 'irra^ff "if fsT^t <I^<?$K ^afflnsii^r 1 aad tbe petitioner is exeiupted froia lated 17-2-2009. ;am.st fhe order ofAnnexure-P/ 1 dated tie Director, Panchayat, Chliattisgarh, ae petitioner for staying efFect and 117-2-2009 uassed bv the Additional t'ted. Tlie Additional Collector, Raigarh submitted by Naib Tehsildar, Kharsia bnclusion fhat the pe.titioner does not fore, she was not eligible to contest on ^ for fh.at categoiy aad accordingly, isiag the power under Sectinn 36 !' \-\! Raj Evain Gram Swaraj Adhiniy&m, letitioner subinitted tbat the petitioner |ie said Gram Panchaya.t. Her election |filmg Election Petition. She beloTigs to ni^exure-P/ 11) to this efl'ect has already |iitliority. T'he Additional Collector ha.d Ipetitioner to be a Saipaiich of tiie said not have jurisdiction to Tjiafee enquiiy pentioner. He fruther siAbiaitted that iditional c.011ector had staved execution ^arch, 2009, however, the Director, XI-HC—78 "S^ -*{w\<'\<i, yal'y'Ko, fqciwy wwii a>*<i<*> "^200 am^r TI^!' ('^(•i<i<q) SV^V Tt R;-f WIt 3II^T il>*ii<» Sarve Aa lftiwafNa<i^i -s Paachaya.t has fflegally rejected| subliutted tteat-'fh-is petition m.aT| Director, panGha^a.t to decide. wifhin a speciSecl.'penod as.d ir^ peimitted to discharge her d^ Puraina. . . HaviDg heard leamed coi^ fhe tacts and cireunlstaitces disppsed of ivifh a direction to appeal preferred by the petitio|ner penod ofone laonfh from the dt of-course, subject to co-operatic|p- that statlis quo with respect Sarpaiich, Graiu Paiichayat Piirj todav. <frl14l<"l<ft*1 *1H<'ff^f "fe^ <f^^i< ^TaiRn 3ii^i her appUcation for stay. He flirfher ' be disposed ofwith a direction to the Iie appeal prefen'ed by fhe petitioner fhe laeaiiwhile, the petitioner m.ay be ttiss as Saipanch., Gra.m Panchayat ^.sel tbr tUe petitioner, having icgai'd to of the case, fhe •instaat netition is Tlie Director, Pancbayat to decide the expeditiously preferably within a rte of production of copy of this order, ofthe parties. It is further directed to fbe ctaarge of the petitioner as aina shalt be inam.tained, as it obtains Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishi-a Ju^e