.n .--; i;s«<^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR writ Petitioa Mo. 1232/jyyS 1) 2) 3) VBRSUS 1) 21 3) 4) 5) 6) M/s Raipiir Steel Mouldmg Co. Pvt. Ltd., a Com.paay iucorporated under fhe Indian^ Coinpanies Act, haviag office at Deepak Nagar, Durg (MP). Shri Aairik Singh aged about 52 years S/o Shri Banta Singh, Director, Raipur Steel Mouldiag Coinpauy Pvt. Ltd., resident of Deepak Nagar, Durg (MP), Sbri Mahendra Siagh aged about 38 years s/o Shri Banta Singh, Director, Raipur Steel MouMing CoBipaay Pvt. Ud., resident of Deepak N^ar, Durj (MP). M.P. Electricity Board, a statutoiy body constituted uncter Klectricity (Supply) Act, having ofiSce at Ramiiagar, Jabalpur (MP). The Executive Director (RR), M.P. Electricity Board, Raipur (MP). CoUector, Raipur (MP). CoUector, Durg (MP). Shri N.R. Sahu, Naib Tahsildar, Durg (MF). Chhattisgarh State Electricily Board, Through Secretaiy, Danganiya, Raipur (Chliattisgarh). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDSA. :Hoa'bIe Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for tlie petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 3, 4 6s 5. Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate for the respondent No. 6. None for the respondents No. 1 SE 2. QRAL- ORDBR {Passedon 02/08/2011) 1. By fhis petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have chaUenged fhe recoveiy proceeding irytiated by CoUector, Raipur and show-cause-notice issued to the peft<aoaers dated 28/7/94 ia reterence ED(RR), MPEB, Raipur's letter No. 7344 dated. 27/7/94, 'C' form No. SE/HTC/2509 dated 5/3/1994 and notice dated. 26/11/94 passed by CoUector, Durg ia reference to •^ •f ~£-'— 4. D.0. letter No./ED/R.R./H.T.C./7343/RaiDur dated 27/7/94 whereby bofh the aufhorities has initiated recoveiy proceeding on fhe basis ofcertificate for dues recoverable as land Revenue. After soine ai^iunent, leamed counsel for the petitioners subinits that petitioners are required to file appropriate petition before fhe appellate authority for tadustrial and financial reconstruction for stayitig fhe recoveiy proceediag fherefore, soine reasonable tiTne be graated to the petitioners. On fhe ofher hand, leamed counsel for the respondents No. 3, 4, 5 & 6 opposed fhe petition. On due consideration, petition is disposed of wifhout aay order and for takmg appropriate step relating to stay of rccovery order dated 31/7/95 restiaining the recoveiy shall continue for next 2 inonths from. today. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharraa iir- 1-