1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.481/2006 Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's order appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's order. __________________________________________________________________ CORAM: J.N.PATEL & B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 24.02.2006. 1. The petitioner has challenged the order of suspension pending inquiry. Learned Counsel for petitioner has stated that the order is not proper because it does not disclose that it is suspension pending inquiry and such order of suspension is not supported by any provision of Discipline and Appeal Rules of Zilla Parishad. He further contends that there are documents on record which reveal that the petitioner did not receive alleged documents in his charge when he was transferred there and at that time the 2 documents were already in the Divisional Office. He further contends that the documents were directly carried away by the contractor from the Divisional Office. 2. We do not think that all these contentions can be gone into at this stage because the petitioner will be required to be substantiated this while facing the Departmental Enquiry. The respondents have filed their reply and stated that prima facie they have found that petitioner is involved in that matter and it is also stated that the Departmental Enquiry against him will be conducted expeditiously. 3. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. However, the Departmental Enquiry against petitioner shall be completed as early as possibly and preferably within a period of three weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE ssw