IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.10411-M of 2010 Date of Decision:15.12.2010 M/s Sadhika Sugandh Ltd. and another .... Petitioners Versus M/s C.D. Enterprises .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioners. None for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for setting aside the order dated 7.12.2009 (Annexure P-2) passed in Complaint No.476 dated 18.12.2004 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 read with Section 420 IPC vide which the cross examination of the respondent-complainant has been closed by the trial Court. No one has appeared on behalf of the respondent in spite of service. It is stated that defence evidence is yet to be recorded. Taking into account the arguments as well as the zimni orders as also the fact that no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent to contest this this petition, the interest of justice would be met, if one more opportunity is granted to the petitioner to cross examine the respondent- complainant. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner be granted not more than one opportunity to cross examine the complainant on any one date. 15.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE