IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3283 of 2007 1. MANDODRA KUAR, wife of Late Badri Nath Sinha 1(a) Dulhin Sita Devi, wife of Profl. Rajhans Sahay and daughter of Late Badri Nath Sinha, resident of at P.S. and P.O.- Aurangabad, District Aurangabad 2.Binay Kumar Sinha 3. Saday Kumar Sinha 4. Uday Kumar Sinha, all sons of Late Badri Nath Sinha 5. Santosh Kumar 6. Sanjay Kumar 7. Ajay Kumar, all sons of Binay Kumar Sinha 8. Rajesh Kumar 9. Rakesh Kumar, both sons of Saday Kumar Sinha At present Nos. 1 and 2 to 9 are resident of village Surajpura, P.S. Ssurajpura, District Rohtas Versus 1. DULHIN RAM DULARI Devi, S/o Shiv Pujan Ram 2. Shiv Pujan Ram, son of Late Gajadhar Ram, residents of village Surajpura, P.O. and P.S. Surajpura, District Rohtas at present residing at Mohalla Makhaniakuan Road, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna-4 3. Raghunath Prasad @ Ram son of Late Gajadhar Ram resident of village , P.O. and P.S. Surajpura, District Rohtas, at present Inspector of Cooperative Society , Patna- Gaya Road, Patna 4. Kashi Nath Prasad, son of Late Gajadhar Ram, resident of village Surajpura, P.S. Surajpura, District Rohtas 5. Shiv Nath Prasad, son of Late Gajadhar Ram, resident of resident of village Surajpura, P.S. Surajpura, District Rohtas, at present Assistant Engineer, Rural Electician Division, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 6. Vinod Kumar 7. Anil Kumar 8. Dharam Jee, all sons of Kashi Nath Pd. Under the Guardianship of their father, next friends and well wisher, All resident of village Surajpura, P.S. Surajpura, District Rohtas ----------- 03/ 21.04.2009 It appears, Second Appeal No. 105 of 2000 was dismissed for failure to comply with the order dated 28.4.2003. The restoration application has, however, been filed after about three years. In the circumstances, while condoning the delay in filing the restoration application and restoring the second appeal, I direct the counsel for the appellants to deposit Rs. 300/- in the 2 Patna High Court, Legal Services Committee within one week and file receipt showing such payment in the office and thereafter Second Appeal No. 105 of 2000 be restored to its original file and number. Learned counsel for the appellants is further allowed two weeks’ time from the date of filing of the receipt in the office to remove the defects, failing which the appeal shall again stand dismissed without further reference to a Bench. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)