IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 197 of 2010 Smt. Roshni Devi & another …………..Appellants Versus District Inspector of Schools, Dehradun & others ………Respondents …………………… Mr. M.C.Pant, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel, present for the State. Mr. Birendra Adhikari, Advocate for the respondents 2 to 4. Mr. Maninder Bhandari, holding brief of Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the respondent no. 5. . Judgment Coram : Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) By the judgment and order under appeal, the writ petition filed by the appellants has been dismissed in view of the order passed in Writ Petition No. 1755 of 2001 (S/S). The appointments of two people were interfered by the District Inspector of Schools. They successfully challenged the said interference in the writ petition, registered as Writ Petition No. 1755 of 2001 (S/S). Success thus obtained was challenged by filing an appeal by one of the appellants therein. The said appeal has been dismissed. In the writ petition, which has been dismissed by the Judgment and order under appeal, the appellants had contended that the interference thus made by the District Inspector of Schools is appropriate, and benefit of such interference should be 2 accorded to the appellants. Since such interference has already been found in the presence of one of the appellants as unjust, the writ petition of the appellants had no other destiny but to be dismissed. That having been done, there is no scope of interference. The appeal is not admitted. The same is dismissed as such. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 28.12.2011 28.12.2011 Kaushal