IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1346 of 2011 MONU PANDIT @ GAURAV KAUSHIK, S/o Kishore Kaushik. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 14.09.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 33608 of 2010 but had been granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that all the accused persons have been charged by order dated 15.12.2010. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Katihar in connection with S.Tr. No. 498 of 2010 arising out of Mansahi P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and 2 the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)