IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-31620 of 2010 Date of Decision:3.5.2011 Dev and others .... Petitioners Versus Balbir Kaur and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.K. Chauchan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Neelam, A.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint on the basis of compromise. Accordingly, notice of motion was issued on 27.10.2010 and the parties were directed to appear before the trial Court on 9.11.2010. The trial Court was further directed to record a finding whether any volunteer compromise has been arrived at between the parties. In pursuance to the same, report from the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Balachaur (S.B.S. Nagar) has been received. As per the said report, no volunteer compromise has been effected between the parties as the accused have not complied with the terms and conditions of the compromise. In view of the above, the present petition only on the basis of compromise is not maintainable. CRM M-31620 of 2010 -2- Dismissed. However, in case of subsequent compromise, the petitioners are at liberty to file afresh. 3.5.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE