IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETIT101§$13IQ 7§&~ L1 /2006 PETITIONERS Laxmi Narayan Verma, Son of Prem Lal Verma, aged about 41 years, resident of Village Behgahan, P.O. Beldar Seoni, Kharora, District Raipur (C.G.). . Yuvraj Verma, Son of Bhagat Ram Verma, aged about 41 years, resident of Village Sonbaltha, District—Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Education Department (Ministry) , D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.). ./Deputy Director of Public Institution, Education (3% Department, Post Off1ce Pension Bada, Arvind- Nagar ”Itward, Raipur (C.G.): P ' 3.“ v BIQCk Education Offlcer, Government of Chhattisgarh, Education Department, Post — Tilda, District-Raipur (C.G.). J' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /% OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Q HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitiOiLLS) N0. 7584 of 2006 Petitioners : Laxmi Narayan Verma and another Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Shri, Alok Nigam. counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Deepaii Pandey, P.L. for the respondents/State. O R D E R (Passed on 21st Day of February, m7) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha Vs. $tate of Madhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No. 15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16/2/1 996. allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to approach the respondentslState for consideration and disposal of the petitioners case in terms of the order dated 163/1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents-State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light of the order dated 16/2I1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra). in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to COSt$ . Sd/— Satish K. Agni‘notri l‘ Judge