IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31838 of 2009 Ram Prasad Yadav & Anr Versus State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3. 22.12.2011. Learned counsel for the parties are present. The petitioner has questioned the order dated 20.5.2009 passed by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Madhubani in Criminal Revision No.1380 of 2006, whereby the learned court below, while upholding the order dated 4.11.2006 passed by learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jainagar in M.R.Case No.188 of 2006 under section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has dismissed the revision application. It is not in dispute that the parties were directed to maintain status quo by order dated 4.11.2006. The order passed under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure continues to operate for a period of 60 days subject to extension for a further period of six months. It is perhaps in these circumstances that the learned revisional court refused to grant indulgence to the challenge of the petitioner to the order dated 2 20.5.2009 passed by the learned Magistrate. Considering the circumstances that a period of more than 5 years has lapsed since the passing of the order dated 4.11.2006 under Section 144 of the Code and there being no infirmity in the order passed by the learned court below, no interference is required in the order impugned. This application is dismissed. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)