IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.673 of 1990. FIRST APPEAL NO.673 of 1990. FIRST APPEAL NO.673 of 1990. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ..Appellant versus A.K.Bukhiwal ..Respondent Shri C.M.Lokesh i/b. G.S.Hegde for the appellant Shri Sagar Kasar for the respondent CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 6th May, 2009. DATED : 6th May, 2009. DATED : 6th May, 2009. P.C. 1. Consent terms dated 6.5.2009, signed by the learned Advocate for the appellants, respondent and learned Advocate for the respondent, are tendered in the Court. Both the learned advocates pray for decree in terms of consent terms. Learned Advocate for the respondent states that the respondent is present in the Court and he has signed the consent terms in his presence. Hence the Order. ORDER i. Consent terms as above are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. -2- ii. There shall be a decree in terms of the consent terms, with no order as to costs. iii. The learned Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nashik, who had passed the decree shall act in terms of clause 2 of the Consent terms. iv. Cross objections filed by the respondents stand disposed of with no Order as to costs. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)