IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 10825 of 1993 Date of decision : 03.11.2011 Haryana State Minor Irrigation and T/Well Corpration Ltd. ...Petitioner versus The Presiding Officer and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Nemo for respondent No.1. Mr. Ramesh Goyat, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The bare perusal of the record would reveal that nemo had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on October 20, 2011, when this writ came up for hearing. Consequently, the petition was adjourned for arguments. Today again no one is present on its behalf despite the case having been repeatedly called. From the sequence of events narrated here-in-above, it appears that neither the petitioner nor its counsel is interested in pursuing the petition. Therefore, no option is left with this Court except to dismiss the petition for non- prosecution. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. November 03, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge