-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6147 OF 2005 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.872 OF 2005 Niyaj Ajim Mulla Shaha and Anr. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ... Mr.S.V.Sadavarte Advocate for Applicants Mr.U.V.Nikam A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail. The applicants have been convicted mainly under Section 395 of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for five years. As far as applicant no.1 is concerned, he was apprehended on the spot. At that time, a knife was found in his possession. He has been identified by -2- the witnesses. So also, the applicant no.2 has been identified by witnesses as having taken part in the incident. In this view of the matter, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. Application is rejected. 3. Appeal is expedited. 4. Office to prepare paper-books expeditiously. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]