IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2011 / 20TH ASHADHA 1933 WA.No. 42 of 2011() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.13599/2004 Dated 30/07/2007 .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS ------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB DIVISION, AGALI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY SUB DIVISION, AGALI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SC FOR KSEB P.SANTHALINGAM SRI.PULIKAL ABOOBAKER RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- SRI.RAMAKRISHNA DYEING WORKS, KOTTATHARA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.KARUPPU SAMY, AGED 55 YEARS, 8/3A, RACE COURSE, COIMBATORE DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. MR.SUNNY MATHEW THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... W.A.No.42 of 2011 .................................................................... Dated this the 11th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. This Writ Appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge directing the appellants to demand penalty only for fixed charges because the respondent was found to have used only unauthorised connected load and there was neither misuse of power nor theft of power. Therefore, we do not find any ground to interfere with the judgment under appeal. Consequently, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) jg