€s •^ ^^%Ilt^^l^^^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JONGA'FVRE AT CSHHATTlSCiARH FIRST APPEAL NG. m; OF2005 APPELLANt: r.Dr) vs, RESPONDENTS: ^fplaintiff/ D.Hr.) o^ •^^^ 's'&^03 '0;^:':l ''' ;.'^,:.'< y^Dr. Nalin Jaraes, aged about 60 years, son pf Late P. Jaines, Assistant Director (Retd), Veterinary Services, resident of In front of Telephone Exchange, Bus Stand Road,Bilaspur Keral Praveen Lal, aged about 49 years, son of Late D.J. ^'N I.' . : ': : . .'' ~'. ^Lal, resident.f ojf Jarhabhata, 'Nishant : Poultry Farni, Bilaspur ci/N Civil suit yalyect^at.Rs,3;g2,Q.OO^- CQnrt.f&af{iM4.Rs.42.,OaO'?^«,^:: TUis;:appear;,yatued.;Al;,-Rsv3,52^00p/- ,i3aurf"Ie<!,-ai'fLxe<i.'~Rs,!.^2,04(i/l..<^" . - : • •Afi»EAti,:•uin^^s^€ii]W figl^i ]Bil©l(a®!E;;:o ^-eiv^ pi^QxyEmjss,., 1.90S ii'. r ^. LOK - ADALAT Chhattisearh Hieh Court Canipus, BilasBiu' APPELLANT RESPONDBNT FirstAppeal No.67/20Q5 Dr. Nalia James Versus Keral Praveen Lal Appearaace: Mr. M.L. Saket, couusel for fhe appeUant. Mr. Malay Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent. JUDGMEWr (Passed on 14th day ofJanuary, 2010) ^ • • . . '. 1. In this appeal, aa appUcatioa under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. has been filed, which is suppprted by the afi&davit of appeUant-Dr. Nalia James. In para-2 of fhis application, it has been stated that duruig pendency of the inatter good sense prevailed over fhe pardes aud fhey have settled their disputes and iu accordaiice with the settleinent fhe appellant has registered a sale deed in favour ofthe noffluiee of fb.e respondents namely Radheshyam Agrawal aad, fherefore, no dispute is reniaiaiag by aud between fhe parties. It is further stated that there is no clalm of any of fhe parties whatsoever against each ofher in the niatter and the parfies have also agreed to bear tfaeir respective costs. • 2. Aforesaid setdeinent arrived at between fhe pardes is placed 6n record aud au award to this effect is passed. 3. Pardes shaU be entifled to refund Court fee in aceordance with the provision contamed in Section 21 (1) of the Legal Services AufhorityAct, 1987. 4. The parties shatl bear fheir own costs. 5. Decree be drawn accordingly. Shiha Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Sd/- v Member- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur ,