'Jfl.'f??.5 ." f ^gFS^ ^ ;•: C-? - )<r^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S.No. t^(^0 llWfl PETITIONER Suresh KumarChauhan, S/o Chaitan ^-) Ram, aged about 35 years,Working as L.D.T.(Tribal Dept.)Govt. Praunaiy \^-"c\fl ..''' '°^fs.Y ...-••'"' School galimar, Block- >* ...••"-^<^ll •»••,K.1-" Dharamjaigar, Distt. Raigahr (C.G.) <•^•^•r^ <.A.---" RESPONDENT: VERSUS ^' 1. StateofC.G.Through. Secretary, Tribalwelfare Dipartment, MantralayaD.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -2. Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department, ptR.SS. University Campus Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department, Distt-Raigarh.(C.G.) ^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDA- MUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. DIRECTION/ QRDER OF LIKE NTURE ETC :- r^'sj rf"13Tai~fT' ~s. [ON'BLE MR. SAT1SH :K. AGNIHOT'RI, J. •n PETITION (S-) No. 1380 of2( retrtioner Suresh Ram Chauhan Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Other Shn Amit Kumsr S Shri Susfail Dubey, resoondents. Advocate.forthe petitioner. Govemment Advocate for the State / (Passed on 9m ofMarch, 2007) *r" \'^. 1. The petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 as Lower Division Teacher on a fixed pay scale ofRs. 1200/-. After completion oftwo year probanon, he was granted regular pay scale of'Rs. 1200-2040/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits t'nat the issue involved in the ca.se is asto whetber- the petitinaer is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of mitial appointment or aftsr compsetiois. ofprobation period. 3. The issue involved. herein was considered bv the Madhva Pradesh State Admmistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 fMadhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P, & others), wherein it was held that the simi.ia.rlv situated teacbers are entitied to 2 regular t3av scale w.e.f, the date of isitial arinointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon ole Supreme Court. Tne appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding tlie decisioa of the Tribunal to the effect that the TeachersAssistant Teache.rs are entitlsd to reguiar pay scale from date ofmitial appomtment. 4, Learaed couase! appeariag fbr the petitioners forther submits that this Court. vvhile consi.derins t.be same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers (W.P. (S) No. 4725/ 2006) by ord&r dated 1.9.2006, has granted regular pay scaie w.e.f. tb.e date 5. Learaed counsel appearing tbr the parties jointly submit that tb.is case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court ia the case of Amar Sai Ram <fc otfaers Vs. State ofChhattisgar'h &. others (Supra), 6. tn view ofthat. this oetition is disnosed ofin the same terms. No orcier as to costs- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit