IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONS No.4751, 4745, 4749, 4754 and 7063 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE PRADIP KUMAR SARKAR ============================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- DAYMA RAJENDRAKUMAR MADHAVSINH Versus CHAIRMAN BAVLA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 4751 of 1999 MR UI VYAS for Petitioner No. 1 MR TUSHAR MEHTA for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1,2,3-16,19,24-23 MR DJ BHATT for Respondent No. 1 MR MK VAKHARIA for Respondent No. 3-9 MR DC DAVE for Respondent No. 10-16,18-19,21-23 MR DIPENDRA C BHATT for Respondent No. 17 UNSERVED-REFUSED (R) for Respondent No. 18,20 2. Special Civil Application No. 4754 of 1999 MR UI VYAS for Petitioner No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE PRADIP KUMAR SARKAR Date of decision: 10/07/2001 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT I have heard Mr.U.I.Vyas, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in all this group of petitions. I have also heard Mr.Tushar Mehta, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the newly added respondent No.24, Dholka Agricultural Produce Market Committee. The learned Counsel for the newly added respondent No.24 submits that the Dholka Agricultural Produce Market Committee has taken a decision to absorb the six petitioners as mentioned in the letter dated 5-7-2001 in the service of the Dholka Agricultural Produce Market Committee as clerks and these six petitioners will be appointed by the said Market Committee within a short period of time. In view of the statement and the instructions of the Dholka Agricultural Produce Market Committee, respondent No.24, Mr.Vyas, learned Counsel for the petitioners in all these cases, wants to withdraw all the petitions. The President of the respondent Market Committee is also present in the Court, in whose presence the instructions of the Market Committee are read out and explained to me by the learned Counsel for the respondent No.24. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent No.24, Dholka Agricultural Produce Market Committee, all these petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Stay, if any, shall stand vacated. In case of any difficulty, the petitioners may approach the Court afresh. Direct service is permitted. The letter dated 5-7-2001 issued by the Dholka Agricultural Produce Market Committee be kept on record. 10-7-2001 (P. K. Sarkar, J.) vinod