IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43881 of 2010 Ajay Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Sharda Kumari, A.P.P. ----------- 2 25.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. The influx whatever is visualizing in this case lending towards having the case compromised amongst the parties at its later stage which is evident from the deposition of other witnesses. Some of the witnesses as it appears were examined before the aforesaid event, therefore, they have had supported the prosecution version whom the defence wants to recall for further cross- examination. It is settled ratio of law that recall should not be allowed for the purpose of demolishing the prosecution. As such prayer of the petitioner is found to be not tenable in the eye of law and is accordingly rejected. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)