IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.209 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 21, 2010 State of Haryana .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Naresh Kumar .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) The petition is directed against Judgment dated 17.8.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari whereby appeal filed by the respondent has been allowed and he has been acquitted of the charge under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Acquittal has been recorded while noticing that there was only a marginal adulteration of 1.3% in the sample of `Khoya’ as tested by the Central Food Laboratory. No ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 21, 2010 JUDGE avin Crl. Revision No. of 2008 [2] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?