.1. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 890 OF 2003. APPEAL NO. 890 OF 2003. APPEAL NO. 890 OF 2003. The State of Maharashtra. ..Appellant. VERSUS. Narendra Mogalappa Kammurti & Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr. D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S. B. MHASE & S. B. MHASE & S. B. MHASE & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 30, 2004. : NOVEMBER 30, 2004. : NOVEMBER 30, 2004. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. D.S.Mhiaspurkar, learned APP for the State. Perused the judgment, more specifically paragraph Nos.11 to 13 of the judgment, wherein the discrepencies in the evidence has been pointed by the trial court which has persuaded it to acquit the accused. The view taken by the trial court is possible one. We do not desire to interfere in the matter. Therefore, leave to appeal is rejected. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) V.MOHTA, J.) V.MOHTA, J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.)