IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.13183 of 1996 Between: 1 Bojja Krishna Rao, S/o. Late Venkateswar Rao, R/o. Chinturu Village & mandal, Khammam District. 2 Smt.Bojja Nagamani, W/o. Late B.Venkataramana, R/o. Chinturu Village & mandal, Khammam District. .... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Survey, Settlements & Land Records, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Settlements, IVth Floor,Gagan Vihar, Hyderabad. 3 The Settlement Officer, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chintur mandal, Khammam District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Orders, Directions and more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that disallowing patta by the 3rd respondent herein in case No.Sr.No.2494/77 dated 28.4.1979 and as well as by the 2nd & 1st Respondents herein in case No. AP.No. 754/79 dated 1.3.1983 and file No. L1/559/83 dated 17.5.1984 dismissing the appeals in respect of the total land admeasuring 6.40 Hectares, in OS.No. 86/P, 84/P (R.S.No.96/1) 1.90 Hectares, 86/P, 77/P, 84/P,79/P (R.S.No.100/1) 1.38 Hectares, 76/P, (R.S.No. 100/5) 0.37 Hectares, 69/P (R.S.No. 102/1) 1.80 Hectares, 69/P (R.S.No.105/1) 0.95 Hectares, situated at Chinturu Village & Mandal, Khammam District is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against to the established principles of law, regulations, against to the record, weight of evidence and proof and much against to the principles of natural justice and equity and consequently direct the Respondents to grant patta in respect of the above lands, by calling the entire record, and to pass any other order or orders and directions as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, otherwise, the petitioners shall be put to grave and inexplicable hardship and injury. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.PALIVELA SATYARAJA BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: When the matter was called on 1-2-2008, 20-2-2008 and 13- 6-2008 none appeared for the petitioners nor was there any representation on their behalf. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appears for the petitioners nor is there any representation. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs 11-7-2008 prk