In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Revision No. 882 of 2008 Date of decision : 28.7.2008 Pardeep and others ..... Petitioners vs State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sartej S. Narula, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the revision petition is to the order dated 10.4.2008 framing charge against the petitioners. The petitioners are accused in FIR registered against them under Sections 323/ 308/ 148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that separate charge should have been framed against each of the petitioners on account of that the impugned order is liable to be set aside. However, I do not find any merit in the submission made. Allegations against the petitioners were found to be similar, accordingly, they have been charged by a common order as all of them were found to be guilty of committing offence under Section 308 read with Section 149 IPC. Mere framing of charges against the petitioners does not mean that they have convicted of the offence. Final determination will depend upon the evidence to be led by the parties. I do not find any merit in the present revision petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. 28.7.2008 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge