1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7231 OF 2008 Mathurabai w/o Shivraj Sangangire & others .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Umanath s/o Somnath Bodhankar & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.V. Warad, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.R. Patil, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 5 th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Trial court on considering the application tendered by the respondents seeking restoration of the suit in exercise of powers under Order IX Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, directed restoration of the suit by setting aside the order of dismissal in default, passed earlier. Order passed by the trial court directing restoration of suit is subjected to challenge in this writ petition. 2 In exercise of extra ordinary powers conferred under Article 227 of the 2 Constitution of India, I do not deem it appropriate to cause any interference in the discretion exercised by the trial court in directing restoration of the suit. While considering the fact that the suit is presented in 1985 and is yet pending for disposal, the trial court is directed to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible preferably within six months from today. Writ petition stands rejected summarily. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp7231.08.odt