IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 713 of 2008 Rmandeep Singh, S/o Sri Trilok Singh. … Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ... Respondents Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Krishi Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. B.S. Thind, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Krishi Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. B.S. Thind, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has become infructuous as he has received a communication from the Investigating Officer concerned that after completion of the investigation in the case, the police have submitted chargesheet against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 15.04.2009 V.K.