THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5769 of 2003 29.01.2011 Between: Smt P.Vani And others. ...Petitioners And The Commissioner, Kukatpally Municipal Council, Balanagar Mandal, R.R.District. ...Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5769 of 2003 ORDER: The three petitioners statedly are owners of house sites bearing plot No.9 (880 square yards), plot No.1 (1,112 square yards) and plot No.2 (1,083 square yards) respectively in survey No.115 of Kukatpally village and Municipality within the jurisdiction of the respondent. Statedly, they have constructed a joint compound wall encircling the entire plot area. They filed the instant writ petition alleging that on 30.03.2003, the officials of the respondent threatened to demolish the compound wall on the ground that the compound wall was constructed without obtaining the permission. This Court while admitting the matter ordered status quo on 04.04.2003. The Municipal Commissioner filed the counter affidavit expressing ignorance with regard to the existence of the plots in survey No.115 in Kukatpally village. It is stated therein that the Municipality has not accorded any permission for layout. Insofar as the allegation that there is threat of demolition, in paragraph 7, the Municipal Commissioner stated as follows. It is absolutely incorrect to state that the officials of this respondent visited the suit schedule property on 30.03.2003, and partly caused damaged to the portion of the compound wall. It is equally incorrect to state that the officials have threatened to demolish the compound wall. There are no merits considerations in the grounds raised by the writ petitions. The petitioners have approached on apprehension of demolition. No writ under article 226 could be issued on apprehension. The petitioners failed to make out any grounds to issue writ of Mandamus as there is no statutory violation on the part of this respondent. The W.P., is liable to be dismissed. In view of the above, the writ petition must be held to have been filed on mere apprehension. Be that as it is, as there is an interim order of status quo, the same shall continue unless and unless the respondent takes necessary action in accordance with law as provided under Section 194 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 29.01.2011 pln