@ r a 'i) Hum Ram Thaku Age abcut 37 years, Asstt. Teacher, Ska. Shri Anarzd Ram Thakur, Gav: Primary Sshcch Brgmn, Eben Bemgiaw, Dz‘stt. Bur (CG). 2) Lam Kumar Pate Age about 5Q years kssfz. Teacher; Sm. Shri Than ngn Pateé,‘ Gevz‘. Primary 89mm Turasema-ri‘y‘a, Shack Bemetara, DiSt't. ur (C. Vefsus 1‘} Stak {Saw of Ch‘naitisgarh thrcmgh Sam'etaa'y WeE‘Eaye D wf f? Eriucafinr; Dwartment, 9&8. Bhawag, Distt. Ra§pur (C ). GEN. O£§EK {Fagga an 253%” (Say 9f A§ari§7 2mg} s se f am With connt o ieamed counse¥ earing for bath i‘ne pames, ihe matier is heard finailv 2) The petitioners were initiaHy appoimed on 8-8—9§1 and W8-1-’§9§3 (Annexure Pm as Asséstant Teachers 0m a fixed pay scaie of Ra 500f— fer the eeriod of in§iia> two years. After comme‘mn of probation, the petiiiowers were granted reguiar pay sca1e of Rs. 1200-EGAGI— on ESQ-$95 (Amexure P/2). 3) Learned counsei appeai‘mg for the petitioners as wen as m“ me Siateirespondents ioiniiy submii that the facte and quesiion of Saw invowed in the presenanif petition are similar i0 inai‘of in Writ Peiiiion (3} No. 7002 of 2006 {Yoges‘nwar Praead P’tanwar Vs. Staie of Ci’inanisgarn and oihers) which was HaGH coum OF enaawsGARH; mmw Wis: Femen {$3 m. 238? 0% wag Petitioners a r. g i, S Dg 85 Reswndents Tr‘ al e rf9n 2} Digit. Educafion Officer, Bemetara, Dist: Burg mm v, J,. 3‘, Qicck Educatiom Cmcei’, $aza, Désti‘. Burg (CG). (Writ Petm’on under Arfide 226 of the Consfituticn of india) $3: Hesi’bie Mr. 3ai§sh K. §g§}§hom, J. Wesent; S‘ ri Ajay Shm'astava, csunsei forthe $3 mmers Shri Nok Eakshi, Govt. Advacate ferihe State. d§sposed of vide order dated “i5-12—‘2G06 (Annexure PI5). Leamed counse? further submit that this pethion may be disposed 0f in the same terms 4) In View of the above stated submissions macie bv ieamed counsei for the parties, the writ petition is disposed'of in the same ierms i.e., the peimoners are granted Iiberfy to make a representation to consider the petitioners if it stands on the same footings as oer order dated 24-8—1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunat, Jabatour. in OANo. 2745 ot es {Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs State of MP and others) and subsequentiy confirmed by order dated :3- 1—1994 passed by the Hon’bie Sooreme Court ih Soeoias Leave Petition (Ch/ii) Raju No.6892 ig3 and grant reiiet accordingtv. r‘ x scy. SatlSh K Agnlhngm Judge I t f I\ t I