C.O.C.P.No. 467 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P.No. 467 of 2009 Date of decision: 19th August, 2009 Gurdeep Singh and others ……..Petitioners Versus Jeet Singh and others …….Respondents Before: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present: Mr. Y.S.Turka, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S.Cooner, Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2. Rajive Bhalla, J. The petitioners pray that the respondents be punished for disobeying the order dated 7.05.2007, vide which respondent no. 1 was restrained from alienating the suit land. Counsel for the respondents has filed a reply, admitting that after the passing of the order dated 7.05.2007, respondent no. 1 has suffered a collusive decree in favour of his daughter Sukhwinder Kaur. It is however, submitted that as his share in the suit property is not in dispute, he is not bound by the order dated 7.05.2007. Counsel for the respondents states that in case there is any violation of the order, he tenders an unqualified apology and further states that Sukhwinder Kaur, would be bound by the out come of the proceedings pending inter parties. 1 C.O.C.P.No. 467 of 2009 In view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents, the notice is discharged. It is made clear that as Sukhwinder Kaur, is a transferee pendente lite she would be bound by the out come of the civil proceedings pending inter parties. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. [RAJIVE BHALLA] JUDGE 19th August, 2009 SKaushik 2