Crl.M.No.M-8157 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-8157 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 30, 2010 Umar Mohd. .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rajinder Singh Arya, DAG, Haryana. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.222, dated 2.8.2008, registered under Sections 323, 324, 325, 148, 149, 506 IPC, and Section 326 IPC added lateron, at Police Station Punhana, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 22.3.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.14626 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M 8157 of 2010 Argues that petitioner is a student and that it is a case of version and cross-version and that co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail. It has further been contended that alleged weapon of offence has already been recovered from the petitioner. Notice of motion for 30.4.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation Crl.M.No.M-8157 of 2010 (O&M) -2- and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 22.3.2010, granting interim bail to petitioner-Umar Mohd., is, hereby confirmed subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 30 .4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge