IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REVISIOn No.313 of 2006 NURUL ISLAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 18.07.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 7. It appears under the impugned judgment dated 14.2.2006 passed by Sri Ishrat Ulla, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Buxar in G.R.No. 1303 of 1994 Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 7 have been acquitted of the charge under Section 323 and other allied Sections of the Penal Code including Section 148 of the Penal Code as out of the 12 charge-sheet witnesses four became hostile and there was inherent contradiction in the evidence of the informant and the other eye- witnesses, namely, P.W.-7,2,3 and 5, who were his close relations and appreciating such contradiction as also the fact that the Investigating Officer was not examined and that the four witnesses, namely, P.Ws. 1,8,9 and 10 became hostile, the court below has acquitted the opposite parties. I do not see any illegality in the impugned judgment and this Cr. Revision application is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)