IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 1ST AUGUST 2011 / 10TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21442 of 2010(E) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- P.S.VISHNU, VISHNU BHAVAN, THEVALAPPURAM, PUTHOOR, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G), KOLLAM. 2. PUTHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, LTD. NO. 1287, REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT, POOTHOOR.P.O., KOLLAM. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.MANOJ R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SRI.RAHUL VENUGOPAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21442 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner's father Padmakumar was an employee of the second respondent bank. He died in harness on 12.1.2010 after 26 years of service. According to the petitioner, he is entitled to get appointment to the Society under the dying-in- harness scheme. For the purpose, the petitioner had submitted Ext.P1 application. The Managing Committee in their meeting held on 24.3.2010 decided to appoint the petitioner as a salesman and sought permission of the first respondent for such appointment. As per Exts.P2 and P3 proceedings, the Joint Registrar has directed the bank to appoint the petitioner as a Junior Clerk in terms of clause (d) of Rule 188A of the Co- operative Societies Rules 1969. However, the petitioner complains that, in spite of Exts.P2 and P3 he has not been appointed till date. The petitioner therefore, seeks appropriate directions to the first respondent to implement Exts.P2 and P3 orders. 2. In view of the limited relief that is sought, I do not think W.P.(C) No.21442 OF 2010 2 it necessary to issue notice in this case. The learned Government Pleader submits that first respondent shall take necessary action to implement Exts.P2 and P3 expeditiously. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to take appropriate action for the implementation of Exts.P2 and P3 proceedings and to see that the petitioner is appointed pursuant to the said proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE cms