THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8966 of 2009 Dated : 30.10.2009 Between : Sai Kisan Plastics ….. Petitioner a n d The State of A.P. & another ….. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8966 OF 2009 ORDER : This criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed by the petitioner seeking to suspend the Proceeding No.C/3600/09 dated 15.10.2009 issued by the Executive Magistrate & Tahasildar, Suryapet. 2) Brief facts of the case are that on a representation given by some villagers of Suryapet, complaining pollution caused by ‘Sai Kiran Plastics’, owned by the petitioner, the Executive Magistrate & Tahasildar, Suryapet, after due enquiry, ordered the petitioner to close the said industry under Section 133 Cr.P.C. 3) Heard the learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the industry was established in the year 1990 when there were no residential houses in the vicinity, and that now, after expansion of the town, houses have come up around the industry and that the Tahasildar has not given any time for shifting the premises of the industry and the petitioner requires substantial time to shift the industry to another place. 5) Considering the circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner shall shift his industry to another place within a period of one year from today and till such time he can run his industry in the present premises only. In case, he is not able to shift his industry to another place within one year, he shall stop running the same at the end of one year till he shifts the same. As substantial time of one year is being granted, he shall not ask for further time. The progress with regard to the shifting shall be informed to the Tahasildar after six months and thereafter every month. The Tahasildar shall take effective steps for shifting i.e. verify whether shifting process is in actual progress or not. Further, the petitioner has to take care to see that the industry is not established in a place where residential locality is likely to be developed in near future. 6) The criminal petition is disposed of with above observations. ______________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 30th October, 2009 Note : Issue C.C. by 02/11/2009 B/o. SUR