»'<fi,-^< IH IHE HIGH CQU!CT._OF JUDICATURE CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P._N0.37047/'2604 y.'^^y /^f RaiBbharasa Sahu S/o Late Shri Dasflu Ran Saha, aged abiut 37 years, Assistant Teacher, VilifP.O. Jatkaabar. Bist. Rajnandgaan. <^/ '<y VERSUS RESgONDENTS tl) State »f Chatttsgarh; thmigh the secretary» Sclr-l Educatl»n DepartiBent, DKS Bhawan. RaJLyur ( C.G.). 2) Ifae BistE.Let EGlucatiea Offieer. RajaaRdgaen, Dtst. Rajnandgaca. 3) Bl»ck Educatien Officer, B»ngargarh. WRI'r EETIEIOH U»SER AKI'ICLE 226/227 _QF_THE_Cg STrrd'EION OF INDIA W.P.No. 3704 of2004 Petifioner Rambharosa Sahu Versus Respondents StateofChhatfe^irh&otheTS SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri Adil Minhaj.Advocate forthe petftioner. Shri fysf Dwh/edi, Panel Lawyer feMhe respondents/State c. -:^ .^e, ^ Bablu ORDER ( Passed on this 27th day ofFebruaty. 2007) The followng order of the Court is passed bySafeh K. Agnihotri, •I, 1. The petttioner, while worldng as Assislant TeiKAer in Middle Schoot, Belgaon, BtockDongeigarh, was frand'erred to Primary School, Arta, District Rajnandgaon, on^ ttie same terms and conditions vkte impugned transfer order dated 31.7.2004 ^nnexurePQ). 2. This Court vide interim order dated 17.12.2004 directed for maintalnmg <rf status quo, as was exisfingon thatday. 3. Be that as it may.with the passags <rf tjme this peBBon ftas bec<me infructaous as pwlod of transfer is rK* applicabte forevCT. At (his pohd of Ume ftere is no questfon to examlne Uie wlkllty of Bw transfer order. However, ttie r^pondents areat Uberty to pass approprferte ordsre keeping in view the publte interest and admlntetrafive exigemy, withoutinsisUng oncompliancexrftheimpugned transfer order. 4. It is well settled principle of law that tranrfer is an incklent <rf setvice arid it is for the empl<^er to decide as to where a paifeular officer/employee be posted keeping in vi®»publte intsrest as well as admini^raUve exigency: This Court has llmtted lurisdte&m to intertere in the transfer mattsr and ttiis Court can interfere onty in fte cree cf proved malafkte, non-competenee of aufliority passhig tte transfer order and fransfer onter not being in conformity wth Bie rutes and regulafions. 5. In view of the above, this petitfon stends dlsposed <rf. No order as to costs- , '--,' •-•"•'. ^I':.SdA::^ .:. i SatishK.i'^gnifiotri 'v r—-^' Judge'^ : i.-^f-