IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) 262 of 2011 Smt. Yamini Singh D/o Late Arya Shah …. Petitioner Versus Akshay Bikram Shah and another … Respondents Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2. By means of this petition the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 1-2-2011 passed by respondent No.2 in O.S. No. 70/2011, Yamini Singh Vs. Akshya Bikram Shah. Perusal of impugned order shows that the learned Civil Judge(S.D.) Dehradun declined to pass exparte order on the interim relief application filed by petitioner in the suit and fixed date 15.02.2011 for hearing after issuing notice to the defendant/respondent. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed in limine. However, it is directed that the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) concerned shall expedite the disposal of the interim relief application preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The petitioner is also given liberty to serve the defendant/respondent Dasti with the permission of trial court, if the defendant is not served as yet. (B.S. Verma, J.) Dated: 14-02-2011 ISB