IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.553 of 2010 1. DILIP PASWAN S/O SRI RAMESHWAR PASWAN MOHALLA- CHITKOHARA, GARDANIBAGH, P.S.- GARDANIBAGH, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PATNA (DISSOLVED) THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, BLOCK-C, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA 2. VICE-CHAIRMAN, PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PATNA (DISSOLVED), MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, BLOCK-C, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA 3. VIGILANCE OFFICER, PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PATNA (DISSOLVED), MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, BLOCK-C, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA 4. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BUDH MARG, PATNA 5. TOWN COMMISSIONER PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, BLOCK-C, DAK BUNGLOW ROAD, PATNA ----------- 4/ 20/05/2011 Statement has been made in paragraph-9 of the counter affidavit filed by the Patna Municipal Corporation that the plot of the petitioner falls in the aircraft glide path for the Patna Airport and requires No Objection Certificate from the Airport Authority of India only whereafter construction raised can be considered for post facto sanction by the Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to approach the Airport Authority for the purpose. The application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)