1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4661 OF 2010. Rose Education Society and others ..Vrs.. Union of India and others ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ( Mr. Anand Parchure,Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M. M. Agnihotri, Advocate for the respondent No.2.) -0-0- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE, J J. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2011. The proposal submitted by the petitioners are still to be under consideration of respondent No.1/Head Office at New Delhi. 02) Mr. M. M. Agnihotri, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2/National Highways Authority of India, is seeking time to make further statement in this respect. 03) Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.3/Special Land Acquisition Officer and Mr. Mishra, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1/Union of India. 2 04) In this situation, we find that in the interest of justice can be taken care of by directing the Head Office of respondent No.1 to take appropriate decision on the representation made by the petitioners as early as possible and in any case within the period of eight weeks from the communication of this order. If necessary, the respondent No.1(Head Office) may grant opportunity of hearing. With these directions, petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 05) Needless to mention that the contention raised in the petition and in defence are kept open for due consideration, if occasion, therefor arises. 06) Steno copy of this order, duly authenticated, be provided to the respective parties, to act upon. JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh