1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.92 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.313 OF 2007 Priyakumar Triloknath Agarwal .. Plaintiff -versus M/s Raghunath Company & Ors .. Defendants and Mrs. Savitridevi Bajaj & ors .. Respondents. Mr. Anup Dasgupta i/by Jhangiani, Narulla & Associatesfor the plaintiff Mr. N.K. Singh, i/b M.M. Vashi, for defendant Nos 3 to 6 and 12 to 15. CORAM: R. G. KETKAR, J. DATED: 18th September, 2009. P.C. 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the plaintiff for setting aside the abatement of the suit against defendant No.16 and for condoning the delay of 582 days caused in taking out the present Chamber Summons and finally for bringing the heirs and legal representatives of the defendant N.16 on record. 2 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the assertions made in the affidavit in support of this Chamber Summons, Chamber Summons deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence the following order. ORDER I) Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) with no order as to costs. II) The amendment to be carried out within two weeks and copy of the amended to be served on the otherside within two weeks . III)Chamber summons stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.G. KETKAR, J)