IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI C.C.NO. 1003 OF 2010 In WP.No. 8467 of 2003 Between: T.N. Sujatha Lakshmi … Petitioner V/s. K. Sambasiva Rao & 4-Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s. Srinivas Polavarapu Counsel for the Respondents: GP for School Education R-1 to R-3 Respondents 4 & 5 : Not necessary parties The Court made the following order : Order follows 2nd page THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 1003 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION No. 8467 OF 2003 O R D E R : This contempt case has been filed alleging violation of the order passed by this Court dated 06-4-2009 in WP.No. 8467 of 2003, which was disposed of with a direction as under: “ In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petitions with a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the request of the petitioners as per the proposals submitted by the 5th respondent-Management for absorption into aided posts and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs.” In response to the notice ordered by this Court, the District Educational Officer, Hyderabad filed a counter-affidavit stating that in view of the ban imposed vide Government Memo dated 20-10-2004 the proposals submitted by the Management could not be considered. In the additional counter-affidavit dated 16-11-2010 it is further explained that the said fact was intimated to the petitioner by proceedings dated 08-11-2010. However, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the reasons stated in the proceedings dated 08- 11-2010 are factually incorrect and untenable. If aggrieved, it is for the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 08-11-2010 by availing the appropriate remedy available under law. The legality/validity of the proceedings dated 08-11-2010 need not be gone into in the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. ____________________ JUSTICE G. ROHINI 01-12-2010 I s L THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 1003 OF 2010 01-12-2010 I s L