THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.263 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in complying with the order dated 26.03.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.7881 of 2007 in W.P.No.6161 of 2007, which reads as under: “There shall be interim direction to the respondents to continue the petitioners in service if they are in service as on today on the same terms and conditions as of now.” There is no necessity of going into all the details. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation that in compliance of the aforesaid orders, the 3rd respondent issued proceedings dated 18.11.2010, whereby the petitioner herein was directed to report to Deputy Executive Engineer to engage his services. The said proceedings have been placed on record for kind perusal of this Court. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the services of the petitioner ought to have been engaged immediately after passing of the interim order dated 26.03.2007 in WPMP.No.7881 of 2007. The contention of the petitioner cannot be gone into by this Court in a contempt case like this. Since the respondents have considered the case of the petitioner and passed a detailed order as stated supra, it cannot be said that the respondents have disobeyed the orders of this Court. Thus, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, this will not preclude the petitioner from working out the remedies as available to him under law. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 19.11.2009 v v