1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5018 OF 2008 (Shivaji Education Society & Anr. vs. Rahul Manoharrao Behare & Anr. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 03, 2008. Heard Shri P.S. Tiwari, Advocate holding for Shri Kilor, learned counsel for the petitioners. The contention is, Respondent No.1 agreed that his appointment is subject to approval by Respondent No.2 – Deputy Director of Education. The School Tribunal has appreciated this issue also. It has found that his appointment was legal and valid and it was not the case of the petitioners that his performance was not satisfactory. It was also not the case that any departmental enquiry was conducted against him. In the circumstances, merely because Respondent No.1 agreed that his appointment is subject to approval of Respondent No.1 and if approval is not granted, his appointment can be terminated, it cannot be the reason for the petitioners to terminate the services of Respondent No.1. 2 I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity in the approach of School Tribunal. Writ Petition is dismissed. However, in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.