IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5143 of 2006 ANUP KUMAR Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 04. 11-8-2008 It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he does not dispute that petitioner has been taken back in service but till date he does not know why he was removed and then restored on the post he was working. According to him, there could be an occasion for the respondents to pay salary for the period he was illegally taken away from service. In absence of any pleading or affidavit which should have been filed by the respondents, the Court in its wisdom allows the petitioner to pursue his matter with the competent authority if he is so advised in this regard. The writ application stands disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner in this respect. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)