IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 12800 of 2000 Between: 1. K.Ramakrishna and partners, rep.by its partner, K.Ramakrishna S/o K.Veeranna, R/o Mandapeta, E.G.District. 2. K.S.Prakash S/o Subba Rao, Dharmagundam Street, Mandapeta. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Municipal Council, Mandapeta, rep.by its Chairperson, Mandapeta, E.G.District. 2. The Commissioner, Mandapeta Municipality, Mandapeta, E.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not calling for the tenders for execution of the works which are more than Rs.2,000/- of estimated cost is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the rules issued vide.G.O.Ms.No.627, MA, Dt.7.10.1967 and further direct the respondents to call for the tenders strictly in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.627, MA, Dt.7.10.1967. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. K. Rama Krishna, Advocate representing Mr. P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.E.SAMBASIVA PRATAP The Court made the following : ORDER: Mr.K.Ramakrishna representing Mr.P.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) 14.09.2004. pln ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Chairperson, Mandapeta Municipal Council, Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 2. The Commissioner, Mandapeta Municipality, Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 3. 2 CD copies.