IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 6164 of 2009 Between: M/s. Marvel Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Rep.by its Managing Director, V.T.Raj Kumar,S/o.V.T. Takur R/o. Plot No. 102 5 B, Road No.45, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Industries Government of A.P. Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad - 500 001. 2 The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Abids Division, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Government of A.P. Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petition submitted by the petitioner on 16-02-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to consider and dispose of the petition dated 16-02-2009 submitted by the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.VENKATADRI Counsel for the Respondents: Sri A.V. Krishna Koundinya, Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) The only grievance which has been ventilated in the petition is with regard to non-consideration by respondent No.2 of the representation dated 16-02-2009 made to him by the petitioner. 2. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the representation of the petitioner is pending since 16- 02-2009 and no action has been taken so far on the said representation. 3. Looking to the facts of the case, without going into the merits of the case, we direct respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner in accordance with law, within four weeks from today. The decision which may be taken on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner by registered post acknowledgement due. 4. In view of the above direction, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 24th June, 2009 ks