IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.956 of 2009 Date of decision: 8.9.2009 Kaushalya Devi and others ......Petitioner(s) Versus Dr. Abhinav Trikha ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) The grievance of the petitioners in this case is that despite the directions passed by this Court, the respondent has failed to allot alternative plots to the petitioners . In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of short affidavit of Dr. Abhinav Trikha, Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Collector Agrarian, Pathankot, has been filed. Along with the said reply, order Annexure R-1 has been attached whereby the petitioners have been allotted alternative land. In view of the aforesaid fact that the alternative land has been allotted to the petitioners, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek an appropriate remedy for possession of the aforesaid plots in accordance with law. September 8, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE