1 cp134.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 134 OF 2009 Himanshu Dwarkadas Ruparelia ...Petitioner. Vs. Slum REhabilitation Authority & Others ...Respondents. Mr. Sachin V. Dhakephalkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Y. Jadhav i/by Mr. vijay Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Kiriti Munshi i/by M/s Thakore Jariwala & Associates for Respodent No.2. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 30th September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned the Counsel for respondent Nos. and 1 and 2. 2. This contempt petition is filed contending that in breach of the order dated 20th October, 2009 passed by this Court to maintain status quo in A.O.No.999 of 2008, the respondent has demolished the temple. The petition was filed on 03-01-2009. The reply was filed by respondent No. 2 on 29-1-2010 and he denied that the temple was 2 cp134.09.sxw demolished and in fact he produced the photographs dated 16-01-2010, showing that not only the temple was intact, even the people were present in the temple. Even though the petitioner had sought time to file rejoinder on 29-4-2010, no rejoinder has been filed. In view of the reply filed by respondent No.2 supported by photographs, I do not find any substance in the contention that there was any breach of the Court's order. 3 For the aforesaid reasons, contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 3 cp134.09.sxw