IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33464 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 18, 2008 Narinder … Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. A.S. Trikha, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. Nos. 58952 & 58953 of 2008 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-33464 of 2008 The petitioner – prisoner has applied for a direction to the Competent Authority to decide his agricultural parole plea within a time bound frame. Another grievance in the context is that respondent No.3 is not initiating the relevant case in spite of the fact that the request has been notified to him. Notice of motion. Crl. Misc. No. M-33464 of 2008 On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to initiate the agricultural parole plea of the petitioner – prisoner and further directed that the Competent Authority i.e. respondent No.1 shall dispose of the parole plea of the petitioner, within a period of one month from today. It will be for the learned State counsel to communicate the order to the Competent Authority. Copy of this order be given to the learned counsel for the State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. December 18, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2