1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2921/2008 (Shri Deepak Champatrao Bambal vrs. The President/Secretary, Shri Bulidan Rathi Muk Badhir Vidyalaya and others) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Shri S.T.Harkare, counsel for petitioners. Shri N.R.Saboo , counsel for respondents 1 and 5 Shri A.M.Deshpande, AGP for Respondents 2 to 4 ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 14th FEBRUARY, 2011. This writ petition challenges the order dated 7.3.2006 passed by the Divisional Social Welfare Officer disposing of the appeal filed by the petitioner as withdrawn on the basis of the letter dated 10.10.2005, submitted by the petitioner for withdrawal of the appeal. The petitioner had applied for review of this order on the basis of his communication dated 18.1.2006 addressed to Divisional Social Welfare Officer, wherein a plea was raised that the communication dated 10.10.2005 was obtained by 2 the respondents under coercion. The application for review has been rejected by the Divisional Social Welfare Officer by his order dated 12/3/2008, on the ground that the review is not maintainable. Hence, this is also the order which is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition. By communication dated 10.10.2005, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the appeal. This communication was placed before the Divisional Social Welfare Officer . Perusal of the order dated 7.3.2006 shows that the petitioner was given sufficient opportunity to raise the dispute in respect of the communication dated 10.10.2005. The petitioner appeared before the Divisional Social Welfare Officer and accepted that he had signed the said communication. The petitioner did not make any reference to his alleged communication dated 18.1.2006 when the appeal was decided on 7.3.2006. Acting on the basis of the communication dated 10.10.2005, the Divisional Social Welfare Officer permitted the petitioner to withdraw the appeal. Hence, no fault can be found 3 with the order dated 7.3.2006. The petitioner had challenged this order dated 7.3.2006, by filing Writ Petition No. 111/2007 before this court. After hearing for the some time, the petitioner prayed for permission to withdraw the writ petition so as to enable him to file review petition. Accordingly the liberty was granted and petition was permitted to be withdrawn. The petitioner filed review petition, which has been dismissed by the impugned order dated 12-2/3-2008, holding that the review is not maintainable. In the absence of there being any power to review, the Divisional Social Welfare Officer was right in holding that the review was not maintainable. Hence, no fault can be found with this order also. In view of above, there is no substance in this petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit