MGJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION L.P.A.No.278 of 2006 in Writ Petition No.9251 of 2004 Shripat Gopal Shinde ..Appellant vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Shri U.S.R.Singhs for appellant. Shri Ranjit Dharmadhikari for respondent no.3. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 27th February, 2007 27th February, 2007 27th February, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the order passed by the learned single Judge. The learned Single Judge has considered the claim of the appellant. It has been observed by the learned single Judge that in 1993 the name of the appellant has been deleted from the ration card and there is nothing to demonstrate that he is residing in hutment No.T-7. The other ground which was raised that every one should have been considered eligible for the alternative accommodation has been negatived on considering that the Development Control Regulation No.33(10) clause 1.7. No -2- interference is called for. Appeal is hereby rejected. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)