IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5593 of 2010 1. BRAJ KISHORE SRIVASTAVA S/O LATE RAGHUNATH PRASAD VERMA R/O VILL.- TRIBENIGANJ, P.S.- TRIVENIGANJ, DISTT.- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, SUPAUL, DISTT.- SUPAUL 4. THE INCHARGE MEDICAL OFFICER PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, TRIVENIGANJ, SUPAUL ----------- 2 05/01/2011 This Court is not convinced from the oral submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he had made all the submissions before the Bench which heard the contempt matter and when the order was passed in annexure-2. The observation of the Court is there in black and white and mere oral submission that the Court did not consider all his submissions will not do. If the Court concerned did not consider all the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, then the only option for the petitioner is to file a review application if he has any grievance. This Court is not going to allow the petitioner to file a new writ application raising the whole issue - 2 - afresh. This writ application is thus dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)