IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.10035 OF 2004 Shri Tukaram Sattuppa Patil, .. Petitioner Vs 1. Sou. Sitabai alias Manjulabai Ramchandra Patil, and ors. .. Respondents Ms Varsha Palav i/b Mr S.A.Aradhya & Mr. M.Khade for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 21st December, 2004. DATE : 21st December, 2004. DATE : 21st December, 2004. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms.Palav, learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing this petition for some time, fairly stated that reasons need not be recorded for disposing of this petition and the petitioner would be satisfied if he is given liberty to make appropriate application in the civil suit as and when the tenancy proceedings stand concluded. Having regard to the submission of Ms Palav, I am satisfied that the following order will meet the ends of justice. (i) Liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application in Regular Civil Suit No.118 of 1995 as and when the tenancy proceedings pending before the revisional authority stand concluded. Hearing of Revision Application Nos 21/1998 to 27/1998 arising out of the tenancy proceedings pending before the revisional authority is expedited. The petitioner to produce a copy of this order before the revisional authority within six weeks from today. (ii) The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. . An authenticated copy of this order may be made available to the parties. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)