& •"-9- W- R?l /^- '.^n/ /---— ^t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) No.^^B Of20®lo PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: ^^s^ <^i^ .^^" ^ ,^"~ / Smt. Naimvati Pandey Wd/o Late Shri Ram Kumar Pandey , aged about 50 years, C/o N.K. Sharma, P. H. E. Department , Sub Division, Katghora, District Korba (CG). Versus / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir (CG). ^2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Raipur Forest Division, Raipur (CG). 3. Shri Keshav Kumar Pandey, Forest Guard, through Range Officer, Forest Range Lavan. ^r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^'^ ..'?/' .F^^.X . ~'~^i ,y ^~-, HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1268 OF 2010 Smt. Naimvati Pandey Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of Inijia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shailendra Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6th day'of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with regard to other pensionary benefit which the ' petitioner is entitled to. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amn ,^,