1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4579/2010 Pravin N.Ratnapur ..Petitioner versus The General Manager Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertakings ..Respondents & Anr. Mr.Prathamesh Gokhale and Ms.Bhavana Khemani for Petitioner. Mr.S.N.Patil,AGP – Respondent No. 2-4 Mr.P.M.Palshikar with Ms.Kavita Anchan i/b M.V.Kini & Co.for Res.1 CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : JULY, 6, 2010. P.C. : . Heard counsel for the petitioner and respondent. 2. This petition is directed against order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee whereby the caste claim of the petitioner belonging to Pareet caste came to be 2 invalidated. 3. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel and perused the impugned order. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the Committee has entrusted the investigation to the Vigilance Cell and the documents collected by the Vigilance Cell during the course of enquiry in regard to the father, grand father and real brother of the petitioner were considered by the Committee. In the school leaving certificate of the father of the petitioner Nagesh Hiranna Ratnapur the caste mentioned is Hindu. In school leaving certificate of Deepak , who is brother of the petitioner , his caste is shown as Dhobi and so far as the document pertains to the grand father of the petitioner Chinappa, the caste is shown as Kamathi. These are all the documents pertaining to the grand father, father and real brother of the petitioner 3 4. Taking into consideration these documents the Caste Scrutiny Committee came to the conclusion that the petitioner failed to establish that he belongs to Pareet caste (O.B.C.). Order is just and proper , hence no case is made out for showing indulgence . Petition is dismissed. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)