IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA FIRST APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2001 MR.TAMATURGO CASTELINO & ANR. ....Appellant Versus JANARDHAN V.KAMAT & ORS. ....Respondent Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. M. D'Souza, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. M. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 20th April, 2006 P.C. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties/the constituted attorneys of the parties are present in the Court. The parties have settled the disputes between themselves and filed consent terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. In view of the consent terms filed, the impugned Judgment and Order dated 25th April, 2001 passed by the Ist Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, at Mapusa in Special Civil Suit No.103/96/Sr/I, stands modified. The decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms. The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The parties have produced copies of the plan annexed to the consent terms. In case the parties apply for certified copies of the Judgment and Decree of this Court and the Consent Terms, the Registry is permitted to supply copy of the plan already submitted by the parties, after duly verifying and certifyig the same. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ssm.