>^$J(3^/°^ CD?I BErCKE 5HS H^» a?A'?E ABHIIISSjaATIYE KBIBOTA& BEIGH ^S JABAI£(DR \k ^1 ©ilgiaalA%>l:lcaMoa srQ«4^:±=L-^/i^<& App33.cant S8 AMal Mazid Khaa» aged aboat 47 years> soa of Sari AMal Haaid Zhaa» ty ©eeagatioa^orest Saag@r> preseatly posted in Soatia Bastar MM sloa Ja^alpar (HP) • Tersaa ^ Hoa-aspl^eaats ss 1« Sfce State @f M»?< t&r@agh l^e SeePeiaiy @ovfe of M*P» PoresS Departeaent Maatialaya Tallalfe Ihawaii Bhopal (Mp)« 2» 2be CSaief G@aserwat@a? @f Forest l (MiniaidtBfttioa/'iionsazetteel) Satpi!uc» | Bba«an> B&opal ( ^» , ] @» 2he eoaservator of yoree(t» 1 ^ Bala^iai (MP). | 4< Sie Bi'viaioaal^orest Q££Leev» t Soa^Bastar J?rodaetl@a Mvisloa» i Ja^alpar (M£)» i 5, Si3dL Balafaias Iilltoare* Poreart; fiaager,! , tfest P3'@daetioa Diviaioa BalA^iat* E (M^, I 6» aiii Baddhilal Soatatoe, ^©reet ; Sanger Prodaetioa Mvialon Bala^at» | (M^. I 1 *^* S@Cn*I©M19 Of 3HE A2)MIMSiBB^E1rE J!8I5BS&IiSJL65 1985< HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition {S} No. 1337 of2005 Petifioner Abdul Mazid Khaa Versus Respondents State ofM. P. (now Chhattisgarh) & ofhers (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) ^^^ None for fhe petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy and Shri A, V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyers for fhe respondents/ State. O RD B R (orall ( Passed on fhis 19th day ofNovember, 2009) 1. 2. The matter is called for hearing twice. On bofh fhe occasions none appears nor any representation is made on behatf of fhe petitioner. The petiUoner niay not be interested ia prosecuting the matter. In view of the foregoing, the petition is disinissed for want of prosecution. A copy ofthis order shaU be sent to fhe petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Tumane