WP(C) 3192/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By order dated 14.7.2011, the petitioner has already been reinstated in service in revocation of the order of suspension. Thus, one part of the grievances raise d in the writ petition stands redressed. The other part of the grievance is rela ting to arrear monthly salary for 13 months, for January, 2005 and from April, 2 005 to March, 2006. In absence of any counter affidavit filed by the respondents it is not discernible as to why the petitioner has not been paid his salary for the said period. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to examine the said g rievance of the petitioner and upon examination, if it is found that the petitio ner is entitled to receive salary for the said period of 13 months, necessary or ders thereof may be passed. At this stage, Mr. HRA Choudhury, learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is also entitled to arrear subsistence allowance. The autho rity may also look into that grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate or der. Let the appropriate order be passed upon examination of the case of the pet itioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 30.9.2011. Writ petition stands disposed of.