HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED W.P.No.8741 of 1996 06-02-2006 Between: Ch. Ashok Rao … Petitioner and The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others … Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED W.P.No.8741 of 1996 ORDER: The petitioners seeks writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent is not communicating the result of the interview held on 25-07-1991 for appointment to the post of Driver in the respondent Corporation as illegal and arbitrary. The respondent Corporation had absorbed a number of Drivers and Conductors consequent upon the nationalisation of the bus routes. The main grievance of the petitioner is that though he had worked as driver under the displaced operator by name K.Shankar Goud on the route Kaghaznagar to Bejjur via Penchikalpet and appeared for the interview along with the original certificates for the driving test pursuant to the proceedings dated 16-07-1991, the respondent Corporation has not communicated any result so far nor provided any employment. It is averred that on the route in question, two conductors and one driver were selected and the cases of his juniors were considered by the Corporation. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the Corporation. It is seen from the record that the corporation has not filed any counter-affidavit. The writ averments involve the disputed questions of fact. The petitioner has specifically stated that the Corporation had interviewed him on 25-07-1991 pursuant to the proceedings dated 16-07-1991 of the third respondent. The relief prayed for by the petitioner in the writ petition is to declare the result of the interview held on 25-07- 1991 for the post of Driver in the Corporation. Having regard to the facts and the above circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondent Corporation to communicate the result of the interview held on 25-07-1991 to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. In case he is selected in the interview, he may be considered for appointment to the post of Driver subject to fulfilling other Rules and Regulations relating to such appointment and he is fit and eligible to be appointed. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 06-02-2006 bsc