IN THE HIGH COURT OF°<:HHATTISGARH AT BILA^PUR fCHHATTISGARH) Contempt Case (C) No.) ^ 2010. (Arising out of order dated 3.02.10 passed in writ petition (S) No. 1322/2009 by Hon'ble High Court.) ^.v PETITIONER: <l^ ^^y ^'~y'y. '^" Chandrakala Bhagat, wife Late Khageshwar Ram, aged about 36 years, 'residence of Bataikela, (Kansabel) Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents: fContemnors): 1. R.P.Mandal, Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^Sss. s»:S5i?^ s" •s"..»»sy\ ^ "%y-^y:.d-'' 2-Dr.B.S.Anant, Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Surendra Kumar Jaiswal, CoUector, Aadun Jati Kalyan Branch, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Qv^ 4. 'L.alit Shukla, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, ChRattisgarh Presendy Posted as Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Korba, Chhattisgarh. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, T tt XI-HC:-22 ^ ^•y^/'^ ^s^^ sn^i'^1 R-)i.+ sn^r **ff^> yiia -3-sr ^)|^|I«)A|, t}Ti1'y'i<». (««'ii*iy STT^T XR^ ^.....C..^..c^.^/^/- IIICTI wfra» fq^^I' SII^T'CTgiwgfer SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Itfohan Shrivastava, J 14.01.2011 Shri Harish Khuntiya, Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Service of notice on c<j>unsel for the petitioner. ^ounsel for respondents No. 1 & 4. No. 2 8s 3 is awaited. resplsndents Reply has been filed by i Heard. Leamed counsel for i compUance of order passed b^ inW.P. (S) No. 1322 of 2009, 4 the competent authority. In tl^ well as respondent No.4, it h^.s was passed by this Court, the| the matter in respect of paym|ent of necessary verifications an|d Rs.1,91,600/- has been giv( No.036679 dated 7.9.2010, petitioner on 7.9.2010. complied with the order of the disobedience on the part of °hlllcl'lil') WivS ^ fStS <FD<(K ^i SrfitCTSII^I espondents No. 1 8s 4, [he petitioner submitted that in this Court on 3rd February, 2010 [ow the orders have been passed by [e reply filed by respondent No.l as been stated fhat after the order Ir concerned authorities laaat took-up of arrears and after completion formalities, finally a cheque of bn to the petitioner vide cheque iwhich has been receiyed by the Learned counsel appeaifing for the respondents submitted that the respondent autho^ities without undue delay have Court and that there was no willful i-espondents. He submits that the [1[itg^fea ia>s^ ^XI-HC-22 fif.. ^S-ff^ an^i^r K<-<i?b sn^i SftH ^t^ raveen •ys! -^wvi^, liTfly'id. ("idwy STT^T •cra-g? *{WWI IhW* "WI. 200 ^^T' 3ii^T ^gigr ^ifer L £|S time was consumed in cotn carrying out verification and in the order within which the contempt has been committe^. reply, he further submitted regard for the orders and prodpt (npleting various formalities and there was no time limit stipulated jarder was required to be passed, no |. Referring to averment made in the that the respondents have highest ^edings of this Court. made on behalf of this Court, no contempt is made Considering the sub^nissions respondents, in the opinion cjf out. Accordingly, rule is discljiarged. Consequentiy, the petiti(|>n is finally disposed off. <iii''(i<'i'ii)-t fwvS 4 islzt <r"i^i< '^sipOTsn^i Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ?• ..^ (::i 'fcl H IIIIM '• r BiS Bffl