:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 157 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 157 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 157 OF 2008 Meer Mansoor Ali ..Petitioner versus Executive Engineer, Bandra Division Housing Development Board & Ors. ..Respondents Mrs. B. P. Jakhade for the Petitioner. Mr. G. W. Mattos, AGP for the Respondents - State. Mr. J. J. Reddy for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This writ petition has been filed against a notice issued by the respondent No.1 asking the petitioner to produce the documents on the basis of which an identity card / photo pass had been issued to him under the Maharashtra Slum Area (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001. This is not even a show cause notice for cancellation of the identity card / photo pass. :2: Therefore, we do not think that this writ petition can be entertained by this court, at this stage. 2. There is an apprehension by the petitioner’s counsel that immediately after cancelling the identity card / photo pass, the respondent No.1 will demolish the structure and evict the petitioner. In the circumstances, we direct that the petitioner may file his documents and objections, if any, to the notice received by him within a period of one week from today and the 1st respondents shall decide the matter after hearing the petitioner and if he passes an order adverse to the petitioner, he shall not give effect to his order for one week after passing it so that the petitioner is in a position to take remedies that may be available to him in law. 3. The impugned notice is based on some complaint and the learned counsel for the petitioner complains that copy of the complaint is not given to her client. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 ensured that the copy of the complaint can be made available to the petitioner tomorrow i.e. on 1.2.2008 at 11 a.m. in his office. 4. This order has been passed after the parties :3: agreed that the matter can be disposed of at this stage. 5. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)