IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16684 of 2011 1. Ajay kumar gupta . 2. Suneet Gupta Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as also Sanjeev Kumar Mishra learned counsel appearing for the Complainant who has filed a vakalatnama. The allegation in the complaint petition is in a nutshell to the effect that the land of the complainant was purchased by the petitioners from a person who had no title. It is further submitted that the complainant has also filed a title suit for setting aside the sale deed in question. It has further been submitted that as a matter of fact the petitioners are the bonafide purchaser. Counsel for the complainant submits that as a matter of fact the petitioners and the so called vendor was in hands in glove. Since the petitioners themselves have withdrawn the cheques purported to have given by so called vendor. Counsel appearing for the State submits that matter involves the right tile with respect to the property in question. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners, namely, Ajay Kumar Gupta and Suneet Gupta in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No. 1454 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Prakash ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)