IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-13175 of 2010 Date of Decision: 06.05.2010 Meenu Sharma and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. J.S. Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Saroha, Advocate for the complainant. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 9 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. The petitioners, as well as, respondents No.4 and 7 (who are father and mother of petitioner No.1) along with their counsel are present in the Court. The petitioner No.1 refused to talk to her parents and stated that her life and liberty was being threatened by them as she has got married against their wishes. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Sonepat to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, provide appropriate security in accordance with law. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 06.05.2010 JUDGE gurpreet