IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21005 of 2002 Between: Church Post Graduate College, Anapuurna Complex, Bapuji Nagar X Roads, Bowenpally, Secunderabad,. Rep. by its Chairman Joy Anuradha W/o. Edwin, R/o. G.2 SBI Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 All Indian Council for Technical Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi 110 002. 2 The Regional Officer, Southern Regional Office, AICTE, 26 Haddows Road, Shatri Bhavan, Chennai 600 006. 3 Director of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 Osmania University, Rep. by its Registrar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of'' Mandamus '' declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing impugned proceedings F.NO. 431/AP--13ET--APR ( M ) /96 date 24/6/2002 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and in the breach of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to treat, consider and permit the petitioner college to run the MBA ( FT ) course for the academic year 2002 -- 2003 with an intake capacity of 40 students annually Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 : MR.S.S.PRASAD Counsel for Respondent No. 3: G.P. FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.4: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following : ORDER: The present writ petition was filed questioning the proceedings of the first respondent dated 24-6-2002 in so far as reducing the approved intake of students for conduct of management programmes for the period 2002-03. This Court while admitting the writ petition, granted interim suspension by order dated 23-10-2002, which reads as under: “Prima facie, it is evident that the intake in the petitioner institute was reduced without assigning any reason or without issuing any show cause notice. Reduction of intake will not only result in hardship to the petitioner but also would render the correspondent infrastructure waste and depletion of seats. Apart from affecting the interests of the institution, the interests of the students also is involved in the matter. Accordingly, there shall be interim suspension of the impugned order. It is however made clear that it shall be open to the respondents to require the petitioner to comply with the deficiencies, if any.” Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that in view of the interim orders, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA,J 22-6-2005 TVK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Secretary, All Indian Council for Technical Education, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi 110 002. 2 The Regional Officer, Southern Regional Office, AICTE, 26 Haddows Road, Shatri Bhavan, Chennai 600 006. 3 The Director of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 The Registrar, Osmania University, Hyderabad. 5) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VVS}