1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1435 of 2007 IN SUIT NO.1077 of 2007 Neha Sambhawani & Anr ... Plaintiffs versus Champagauri Mohanlal Gandhi & ors ... Defendants ... Ms.Jyoti Mistry i/b S.K. Srivstava & Co. for plaintiff and in support of Notice for the plaintiff Mr.Pranav Sampat i/b M/s.M/s.Thakore Jariwalla & Associates for defendant nos.1 to 4 for the defendant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 25th March 2010 P.C. 1. By this motion, plaintiffs pray for appointment of Court receiver in respect of the said property. When the motion is called out for hearing, counsel for the plaintiff is unable to state even the grounds on which the prayer for appointment of receiver is made though the motion is three years old. Plaintiff was unable to even 2 point out that it had a present right to remove the defendants from the possession of custody of the property which is a condition precedent for appointment of a receiver in view of sub-rule(2) of Rule 1 of Order 40 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In the circumstance, motion is dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)