IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3319 of 2007 BAIJ NATH SHARMA,SON OF LATE SHYAM SHARAN SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GAMHARI, P.O. GAMHARI, P.S. UPHARA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. ---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN, R. BLOCK, ROAD NO.6,PATNA THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), BHAVISHYA NIDHI BVAVAN, R. BLOCK, ROAD NO.6,PATNA. 3. THE BIHAR CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD., BUDH MARG, PATNA THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. ---RESPONDENTS ------- 2. 23.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for the redressal of grievances, representation was filed on 28th of March, 2006, as contained in Annexure 4, as also on 28.9.2006, but the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed. However, the learned counsel submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Patna (respondent no.2). Upon considering the submissions, the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.2 shall consider the same and dispose it of by a reasoned order considering the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of 2 such representation. Upon consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, respondent no.2 shall simultaneously issue necessary orders with regard to the claims of the petitioner as raised in his representation and in the light of the order passed by him on the representation of the petitioner. The application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)