IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2010 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 32848 of 2010(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- T.VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O.M.T.M.NEDUNGADI, AGED 56 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOUSE OF FOODS & CHEMICALS (P) LTD.NO.IV/907, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, KANJIKODE, PALAKKAD-678 623. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, SECOND CIRCLE, PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD-678 001. 3. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts C. K. ABDUL REHIM, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 32848 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 29th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT Limited prayer in this writ petition is only for a consideration and disposal of Ext.P11 petition submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent, seeking rectification of mistakes alleged to have been crept in while finalizing the amnesty benefit under Ext.P9. 2. Petitioner approached the 1st respondent seeking settlement of arrears due on the basis of benefits provided under the Amnesty Scheme. On consideration of his application, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P9 order directing payment of amounts settled thereunder in instalments. 3. According to the petitioner, the amount specified in Ext.P9 is not the actual amount due, since payments already made were not given credit. However, since Ext.P11 is pending before the 1st respondent, I am not 32848/2010 2 inclined to enter on any decision regarding the dispute. I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P11. 4. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P11, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. mn.