J1 l^^l^^^ § '•v^:^ :••'•" '^ ;:.? %. '^y^^ '^•B^ @> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J.& HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Misc. Appeal (Cl No. 1563 of 2009 Appellants/ Claimants ^^ 1. Sonkuwar w/o late Dujram aged about 52 years, 2. Pitambar (wrongly mentioned in order sheet Pitrambar) s/o late Dujram aged about 30 years, 3. Tota Ram s/o Dujram aged about 28 years, 4. Chandresh s/o Dujram, aged about 26 years, 5. Pramila d/o Dujram, aged about 22 years, 6. Kamlesh s/o Dujram, aged about 20 years, 7. Karsh Singh s/o Dujram, aged about 17years, 8. Sailendra Kumar s/o Dujram, aged about 15 years, 9. Pushpa d/o Dujram, aged about 12 years, Appellant No. 7 to 9 are minor, and through his guardian mother Sonkuwar w/olate Dujram, All are by caste Suryavanshi, r/o village Sarwani, police station Saragaon, district Janjgir-Champa C.G. VERSUS Respondents 1 Kanhaiya Lal s/o Ramlal Bareth, ^ '^ Non-applicants aged about 40 years, r/o Devri, polce station Saragaon, district : Janjgir- Champa C.G. (Driver of the offending vehicle) 2 Laxman Das Dodeja s/o M.M. Dodeja, aged about Unknown, r/o near Agrawal Gudakhu Factory, Hemu Nagar, Bilaspur C.G. (Owner of the offending vehicle) 3. I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Bilaspur, district Bilaspur C.G. (Insurer of the offending vehicle) Appeal under Section 173 ofthe MotorVehicle Act. Present: None for the appellants. Shri Sourabh Sharma, counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER (26th July, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge padma