..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2030 OF 2008 Hitendra Ashok Parmar. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.P.Mishra, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Shashikant Parab, Adv. for respondent No.3. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 25th August, 2008. DATED : 25th August, 2008. DATED : 25th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The applicant is facing trial in Sessions Case No.674 of 2006 along with Sessions Case No.141 of 2007. The trial in the said matter is going on before Court No.4, Sessions Court at Sewree. Transfer is being sought from the said Court to any other Sessions Court in Sewree. 3. The ground for seeking the transfer is that on 4.3.2008 when the applicant was standing outside the premises of the Sessions Court, the complainant come towards him, assaulted him and threatened him with ..(2).. dire consequences and informed him that Rs.80,000/- have been given to the Judge who was conducting the matter to ensure favourable order. As far as assault and threats is concerned, no purpose would be achieved by transferring the matter from Court No.4 at Sewree to any other Court at Sewree. Regarding the fact that the complainant informed the applicant that some amount was given to the concerned Sessions Judge for passing favourable order, I find that except the bare word of the complainant, there is nothing else on record. The complainant may have stated so to the applicant without any basis as he may have wanted to intimidate the applicant. Merely because the complainant stated thus to the applicant, it cannot be said that the applicant will not get justice from the said Court. 4. Looking to the grounds taken for transfer, I do not find that this is a fit case to transfer the matter. Hence application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)