IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17719 of 2010 BHAVESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 16.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner husband in a complaint case under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act of a kidnapping on 5.2.07 for an alleged forced marriage does not impress the court so as to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail since the FIR for the alleged kidnapping was lodged belatedly on 17.4.2007. The application is dismissed. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner has to be considered on its own merits in light of the guidelines of this Court for grant of bail in Matrimonial matters, without being prejudiced by the present order. P.Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)