THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11495 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Staff & Workers Union seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondent-Corporation in not supplying the copies of Circulars, Memos and Instructions issued from time to time and also not issuing bus-pass warrants to the representatives of the petitioner-union on par with other unions is arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.T.M. Prasad, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation. The learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to my notice that in an identical circumstances, this Court in Road Transport Corporation Works Union v. APSRTC, Hyderabad (2000(5) ALD 614), held that request of the registered trade unions cannot be denied on the ground that it is a minority trade union. Be that as it may, since the representation dated 23.2.2006 made by the petitioner- union is still pending with the respondent-Corporation, without expressing any opinion as to the eligibility of the petitioner-union, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Corporation to consider the representation of the petitioner-union in the light of the ratio laid down by this Court in Road Transport Corporation Works Union v. APSRTC, Hyderabad (supra) and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 13th June, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11495 OF 2006 13th June, 2006. Between: APSRTC Staff & Workers Union (Regd. No.3155-INTUC), RTC ‘X’ Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, represented by its General Secretary – B. Radhaiah. .. Petitioner. And The APSRTC, Hyderabad, represented by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director. .. Respondent.