Crl.A. 182/2003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.D.AGARWAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER (Oral) This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.3 .2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hailakandi in Sessions Case No. 3 o f 2002 U/S 436,IPC, whereby the accused persons have been acquitted for the offe nce U/S 436,IPC. In this way this appeal is against the judgment of acquittal. A ppellant is not represented by any counsel since last few occasions. Hence, I h ave heard Mr.B.S.Sinha, learned additional public prosecutor, for the State to a scertain the legality of the acquittal. 2. As could be gathered from the impugned judgment and record the l and was a disputed land and both the parties were claiming possession over the s ame land. However the prosecution witnesses failed to prove their plea that the land was purchased by them as well as no concrete evidence was given to show tha t the dwelling house is in their occupation. Besides this the complaint was file d after 4 ‰ months of the alleged offence without satisfactory explanation. Henc e, it is not a fit case to interfere the order of acquittal. In the result, the appeal stands dismissed. No costs. 3. Send down the LCR forthwith.