Crl. Misc No. M 11997 OF 2011 ****** Seema vs State of Punjab Present : Mr. B.S.Baath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gazi Mohd. DAG Punjab ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.22, dated 11.2.2011, registered under Sections 363, 366, 120-B of the IPC, at Police Station Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur. On May 02, 2011, the following order was passed :- “ This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.22 dated 11.2.2011, under Sections 363, 366, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur. On 25.04.2011, the following contention was noticed :- ` Learned counsel has argued that the daughter of the complainant eloped with one Sushant and the petitioner has been roped in unnecessarily.' Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Makhan Singh, states that the petitioner has exact knowledge of the address of the aforesaid Sushant. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that even though the petitioner has nothing to do with the elopement of the daughter of the complainant but she is willing to co-operate with the police to the full extent. In the circumstances I would like to give the petitioner one more opportunity to convince the investigating officer about her bona fides. The petitioner is directed to appear before the investigating officer on 10.05.2011 between 10.00 a.m to 4.00 p.m who shall admit her to conditional bail to his satisfaction. Adjourned to 17.05.2011.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Makhan Singh, states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for any further investigation. Crl. Misc No. M 11997 of 2011 : 2 : In the circumstances, in the event of her arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) May 17, 2011. JUDGE `kk'