Civil Review No.73 of 2007. 1.5.2008 Present : Shri Bimal Gupta, counsel for the petitioners. . Mr.R.M.Bisht, Dy.A.G. for respondent alongwith Respondents 1 to 4. This Review Petition has been filed by the petitioners wherein it has been prayed that the orders which have been passed in CWP No.356 of 2007 should be made applicable in respect of khasra No.205 measuring 1-19 bighas also. The dispute in the writ petition was with regard to the classification of the land. We had appointed a Local Commissioner in the writ petition to actually visit the spot and classify the land in accordance with its actual use. When we had passed the said order no mention of khasra No.205 was made in the said order. It may be true that khasra No.205 was mentioned in the original writ petition but when final order was passed no mention of khasra No.205 was made. Therefore, the Commissioner gave his report in respect of the other land but not in respect of khasra No.205. Normally we may have passed an order recalling the earlier order but this may in fact harm interest of the petitioners themselves. This would also entail the appointment of another Commissioner. Therefore, we do not intend to recall this order. We however make it clear that the order appointing the local Commissioner as well as our final order was not in respect of khasra No.205 which appears to have been left out inadvertently and therefore we give liberty to the petitioners to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action in respect of khasra No.205. Petition disposed of. (Deepak Gupta), Judge May 1, 2008. ( V.K. Ahuja ) PV Judge.