IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9886 of 2006 Between: 1 Meka Bhaskar Rao, s/o Swamy Rao, r/o Mothukur Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 Meka Narahari Rao, s/o Swamy Rao, r/o Mothukur Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. 3 Meka Narsimha Rao, s/o Swamy Rao, r/o Mothukur Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. 4 Meka Vijayalaxmi, w/o late Rajeswar Rao, r/o Mothukur Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 2 the Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhongir, Nalgonda District. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Mothkur (M), Nalgonda District. 4 Mothkur Gram Panchayat, Mothkur village and Mandal, Nalgonda Dist, rep.by its Sarpanch Kothapally Venkateswarlu S/o. Mallaiah (R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 14-6-2007 in W.P.M.P.No.6947 of 2007) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing Memo No.B/3137/05 dated 15-5-2006 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to dispose of the objections filed by the petitioners on 4-5- 2006 in accordance with the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act duly conducting enquiry and set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.KISTAIAH (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9886 of 2006 ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing on 04.03.2009, none appeared for the petitioners and, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted on 12.03.2009 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 12.03.2009, the matter was adjourned to today. Even today, when the matter is called, none appeared for the petitioners and there is no representation. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 13th March, 2009. IBL