IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3571 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 24, 2011 Pritam Chand and ors. … Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and another … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Ramakant Shrma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of seniority and promotion. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondent authority to consider this aspect of the matter. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 2. The respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance 2 with law, in light of the decision referred to above within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment referred to above and a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned before the respondent/competent authority. 3. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 24, 2011 (PK/Jai)