+ XI-HG—78 ^sf ^iqi<n^, ^til^^Ko, f^<y<i^^< NINdl <|,^i*....Wf^....5-c2..20..^ 200^ 3TI^T TT^T (<^5^T) (^ -sn^i "^T fS[7ti^ '<T^T ^TI^T 9h*li^ i^nw Trft^ 3:n^r PETiTiONER; RESPONDENTS:' el>)l&lf<!l^1l "^TR^ff ^' f^^ <F'l^l< IF)'^fRR 3TT^?T Smt. Triveni Bai Navrang, W/o Shri Ram Prasad Navrang, aged about 26 years, Caste Satnami, R/o Vliiage Kusmuli, Tahsll Kota, DIstrict Biiaspur (C.G.) •Versus- 1. |3-- |4, 5. s. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Woman and Chlld Deveiopment, Department JVIantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, •Ralpur (C.G.) Director Panchayat Chhattlsgarh, District Bliaspur (C.G.) Coiiector, (C.G.) Biiaspur, Bilaspur Chlef Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kota, District Bliaspur (C,G.) Woman and Chlid Deveiopment Offlcer, Tahsll Kota, Dlstrict BJIaspur (C.G.) Presidsnt, Health Department; Janpad Panchayat, Kota, Djstrict Biiaspur (C.G.) Smt. Panch Bai, W/o Mohan La!, aged about 36 years, R/o vliiage Kusmuli, . Tahsll 'Kota, District Bi!aspur(C.G.) ^^^ ^-^ XI-HG—78 T ~5~^T ^||^{<nq, ^tll<H^|(o, M<rll^y 3TT^T^T f<^ieh TT^TT 37I^T s^+4icr) l^rinii^) INNIN^ *<i*i<Mr sitW^ "^200 3TT^T ^^K (^Grf35^) ^TTW^f^T ^TT^T Writ Petition under Artici^ Sinaie Bench: Hon 18-9-: Shri indrasen Sahu, courjisel for the petitioner. Mjss Sunita Jain, Panei 3 and 5. Heard. q>»l^f^l€l1Tl'^TFFTf "^ fe^ <P»l^l< ^stRma^T 226/227 of the Constitution of india) ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. -awyer for the State/respondents No.1 , 2, The petitioner has Impu^ned the order dated 14-8-2008 Annexure- P/1 passed by the Dlrector F|anchayat whereby revjsion preferred by respondent No.7 has been ail^wed and her appointment to the post of Aanganbadl Worker In Aangaf) Officer has been canceiied. T| ground that her husband wa.s was appolnted on the post| permisslble a.s per guide!Jnes| Aanganbadi (Annexure-P/2), of Panch o.n 28-2-2006 In acc| (1) ofthe Panchayat;Ra|'Adhi| or not is not the responslbiilty c| After. going through resignation on 28-2-2006 in ac |badl Centre Koskattl by Chief Executive |ie appojntment was assailsd only on the panch of the Gram Panchayat when she of Aanganbadi Worker, which is not jssued by the State for appointment of The revlslon of respondent' No.7 wss aliowed holdinQ that her husbatid had tendered resignatlon from. the post brdance wlth the provlsions of Sectlon 37 iiyam. Whether the same was accepted f her ahusband. :he Impugned order, consjdering the undisputed fact • that. husbai|id "of respondent No.7 had tendered ;ordance. with the provisions of Sectlon 37 1 '^^^% & .J^J XI-HG—78 W^T^Tf^N? TI^T 3'TI^T'^RW ^••i"l»»...) Bar^e IWN^ + '3^r ^ii^s<nq, ^til^^Ko, [oKni^^< '^ *1M(rtl «»^l<sf» •-^ 200 3Tl^?T TT^T ( ^I^^T) ^TTW Trft^T ^TT^T cflo of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniya^ Aanganbadi Worker by the there is no iiJegality or infir|nity interference. The wrlt petition is accorpingiy dismissed. and respondent No.7 was appointed as on 15-9-2006, I am of the opinion that infirjnity in the impugned order warrantlng CM^t<n<fli 'HT^rf ^ fs1(^t iFai^K ^^tfmSTT^T Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge