:-^-/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^r-.s^&WS' CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) N0. 3(5 OF 2011 PETITIONER : ^l^^S^. ^s^5^^--"""' ^9BS>:^"ff '^^^ - Narendra Kumar Gupta, S/o' Shri S.L. Gupta, aged .^... about 52 years, working as ^^.•^to Upper Division Teacher in Lal Bahadur Shashtri Municipal Higher Secondary School, Shanichari, Bilaspur (CG). CONTEMNOR/ RESPONDENT Versus Shri Yashwant Kumar, Con'iraissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur (CG). CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT,1971. ^ ^BBiL,a'^?K&'a»iSr-i',:2'i;S'T.^;S;';S^S^SSg^Sg Sn^iqiTfiFIR; wn sii^i wqw 3^ •^{^W<i, Qxfly'Ko, fsldK-iy ...(^fe....(A?.^^....I^_3^ ; > ••^T, 2od sn^r 'vw (li<<fj«<<i'ti) s '^i<<I<n41Tf ^Wf^ tf Fs*<i| <nq-^.K '^sifa*? 3ii^i SB : Hon'ble srirLManindra Mohfen Shrivastava. J 12-09-2011 s;nn viveK Kanjan i iwar!, cc promotion ana otner Denerits. ! n| dated 29/3/06 Dassed in w.P.Nci unsei ror tne peiitioner. Heard. Learned counsel for the pfetitioner submits tnat tne pemioner niea a wnt petition claiming benefits of pay ^cale on the post of Lecturer from the date of ife saia writ petition was aiiowea in terms OT oraer (.4003/UB. Learnea counsei Tor tne petrtioner submits that in compiiance of th^ order passed by the Court, the respondent is obiiged to pay the difference of sajary of pay on the post of Lecturer w.e.f. the date or Dromotion. Me TunnersuDmits was dismissed as withdrav/n oih 6/7/2011 with iibertv to file representation. hereafter, tne petitioner fiiea a pending. Thereafter, another cont^mpt petition was filed which was dismissed with y to tiie rresn petition. Me oassea on '^B/uy/^uiu in ravout Learnea counse! ror the petitionei] Vide order dated 28/09/201 petitioner 1s entitled to the beneffl eiaosed but the order of the Cou that earlier a contempt petition was filed which representation on 19/07/2011 which remained :submits that the oraer or tne Coun nas Deen ot tne Detitioner ana me oraer stiii stanas. submitted that as ihe order of the Court oblige t'ne respondent to make payment t>f difference of salary along with jnterest, even if no time limit has been Drescribedl the respondent ought to have granted beneflts within a reasonaDle fme which h^s not oeen aone, vi'nicn amounts to tlouting tne order of ths Court. 0. the writ Detition of the petitioner was ailowed ir, terms of order dated 29/03/'0@ passed in vv.P.No.4003/03. Therefore, the |s nowing from ine oraer. Aimost one year nas \t nas not been compiiea witn. bven IT no time has been rixea, the compliarlce or tne order or tne uoun cannot De aeterred ..ifvfV, (T-?; -•"13 -'S/I40—2/2011—1,50,000. »" ^ 'wsaS^ g '^s'-y ^-..Jl^' 3Ii^i'^t1?;im ^I^T 3H^?| **ii<ii ueepti '3^ -<ii<4i<i«, atil'y-iic, istdiyy .....c^...^.^.l^o_3tr/n "^. 200 3n^I-q^?C^iI-i<i<^) , i __-__.._.L inaerinitei to which penoa ot wouia De VV'i ofr. y. in case, me rsspona^nt tiie petiaoner is entitiea one month from the dat^ at llDertv to approacri thi^ m tne aroresaia <^l<ifo^h *i)-4<ii'^f f-a^ <f3)t$i< '^aiRnsiii?! aoes not pass anv oraer extenaing aeneTits, unaer tne oraer passea DV tne uourt witnin a of receipt of copy of this order, the petitioner Court again. >, tne petfflon is nnaiiy aisposea ooservations/airections, Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^HTF^ .^^q ^fl<??.*<, U^"' *'^tT- -*J.S/140—2/2011—1,50,000.