IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review No. 116 of 2011. Decided on: 1st September, 2011. Managing Director, HPPCL and others. ….. Review petitioners. -Versus- Sher Singh. …… Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners. : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The Executive Director (Personnel), H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla will stand impleaded as an additional respondent. The review petitioners point out that the decision pursuant to the judgment dated 7th July, 2011 is to be taken by the Executive Director (Personnel), H.P. State Electricity Board, Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla, being the competent authority in the parent department of H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd.. Therefore, it is clarified that the second respondent herein, i.e., Executive Director (Personnel), H.P. State Electricity Board, Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Shimla shall take a 2 decision as per the judgment dated 7th July, 2011 in C.W.P. No. 5167 of 2011. The petition stands disposed of. A copy of this judgment, duly authenticated by the Court Master, be supplied to the review petitioners to be produced before the second respondent. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 01, 2011. (bhupender/K. Attri)