IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4246 of 2008 Date of Decision: 10.12.2009 T.Babu Raj ...Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents CORAM Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vinod K.Sharma Present: Mr.R.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sandeep Sidhu, Advocate, for Mr.Anupam Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. --- Vinod K.Sharma, J . (Oral It is not in dispute that the petitioner has sought voluntary retirement under the VRS Scheme and the benefit stands paid. The only plea of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there are some dues of the petitioner, for service rendered at Bathinda. This contention of the learned counsel, is disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner sought voluntary retirement under VRS scheme, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of accordingly. The liberty is granted to the petitioner to make a representation CWP No. 4246 of 2008 2 for releasing pending dues, if any, within one month from today. In case any such representation is made the respondents shall dispose of the same in accordance with law, and in case any dues are found payable, the same be paid to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition disposed of as infructuous. (Vinod K.Sharma) 10.12.2009 Judge rp