THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY C.R.P.No.394 OF 2009 ORDER: This revision is filed against the order of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem in E.P.No.22 of 2008 in O.S.No.198 of 2005 dated 21.01.2009. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The petitioner is surety and the salary of the principle debtor has already been attached. As seen from the proceedings dated 19.03.2009, a copy of which(zerox copy) is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petitioner-surety is also an employee. As such, if the decree-holder desires, he may attach the salary of the surety. 4. I see no justification in attaching the movables for paltry amount, that too, household articles, which is obviously filed to embrass the petitioner. In those circumstances, where substantial amount of principal debtor is attached by way of attachment of salary and as there is scope of attachment of the salary of present petitioner also, attachment against movables is raised. 5. The civil revision petition is accordingly allowed and it is made clear that the Decree-holder is at liberty to attach the immovable property and as well as the salary of the petitioner too. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 10th August 2009 Rns