(^-\^ ISfcK^^' ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No. ^,WO 1201Q PETITIONER t RESPONDENTS <L? ..'^ ^^••' ^^ -y ^y' ''y'y ^ Hari Singh Rajput S/o Shri Dwarika Singh Rajput, aged about 48 years, R/o Chandra Vihar, Mangla Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Agriculture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director Agriculture, Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.) . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^. 311^1^ R^tich ^TT 3?T^7T ^TRW ^Sf r<MI^KVI^, ^Xl1'(H<l<o, f«l^ll'y^< , __.....l)3.?.(j)....l/^.:....tobJ.lL 'WT^T'g^W " " " "^';B^200 ^n^rr T^F (yif^^) 'F^rw^fsn^n^ SB : Hon'bje Shri ?vlanindra Moh in^d Q9-08-2Q10 Shri vTvekoharma, counseil Petitioner, through this petitfon account of his supercosslon In thej Director, Agriculture. The case of the peutioner the post of Assistant Director sir|c adverse remark or any punjshmerlt enquiry in currency, by impugr petiuonerss juuiors nameiy ChiranJ been promoted ignoring just ciai^ counsei for the petitloner, the critei] of Assistant Director to Deputy Dir( Chhattisgarh Civii Services (Promc|l!on peutioner was unbiemlsh and h^ promotlon of the peutioner is i| representation to 'respondents ^l however, the same has remainedl made by the petitioner on 9/12/OS. in view of the submJsslcins considot'auon that the peuuorser rj reason has been communicated the interest of justice to direct for yrant of promotion. The responcfent f4r responcfeni <s»)l<lt<n<^Ti '^TR^f ^ fe^t <I^l^s< ^affim^n^r n Shrivastava, J. for the petltloner. seeks to venyiate grievarice arising •on matter of promotion to the post of Deputy ^ that the petitloner has been working on jce the year 1990. Though, there is no mer1t Imposed upon hlm nor any departmenta! order dated 29/12/OS (Annexure P/4) |iv Sarkar and Vinod Kumar Verina have of the petitioner» According to iearned iia in the matter of prom.oti.on froni the post ?ctor is senlority cum merit as iaid down in RuEes), 2003^ servlce records of the gufc scale promotlon in time, the non- pegal. The petitioner subiTiitted detailed |ide hls representatiofi (Annexure • P/5), lundeclded. The said representation was made herelnabove and taking into |ad suffered supercession and so far, no his supercession, 1 deem it expedient In resrtondent NoJ to conslder petitioners ciaim joncfent shali decide petiuoner's representation T^ 1 ^ IJX^HC—78 •:.-y^' ^H^T'^T^fhF '^TT ^FTI^T ^•RfcfT DK^^L: ^ST ^MIO^ ^nl'M^Ko, |s|dt'Liy . ^ fftVKO. ^^/^ W^?T^RW?F""""""""""/"""""""""""""'"^200 3:IT^?T '(T3W (^f^^) 1 by speaking order -within a reason^bie period vvlthin an outer llmit ot' 3 munths of receipt of copy of this order. In case, peutioner's grievan|j( for the peutioner to take recourse under the isw. , With the aforesaid observatll cM^(<n<fti ^T^if 'fif ftxst <P»i^s< ^^tRw^^T ^e is stili not redressed, it would be open such remedy as may be availabie to nirn ^ns, the petition is finaiiy disposed off Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge