IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12802 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. V.V.PHILIP 2. SOSAMMA PHILIP 3. MOLLY PHILIP 4. SHAJI PHILIP PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT CHOLODE, C.N.PURAM P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 3. THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, OPPOSITE TOWN RAILWAY STATION, PALAKKAD. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALAKKAD II VILLAGE PALAKKAD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.12802/2010-A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners seek for a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 application filed seeking for a re-classification of the property in re- survey No.2370/1. It is pointed out that in the Village records, it is mentioned wrongly as nanja. It is paramba and, therefore, it is submitted that it cannot be classified as wet land. The petitioners intend to construct separate residential house in the property and unless they are getting the classification changed, they cannot get building permit. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 after hearing the fourth petitioner within a period of six weeks. The petitioners will be entitled to rely upon Exts.P3 and P6 which will be considered by the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms