In the High Court of Judicature at Patna. Cr. Misc. No. 17171 of 2009 1.Md. Minhaj Alam 2.Zamshed Alam 3.Md. Zahur @ Rahman Vs.State of Bihar 2 13.5.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. This Court is not satisfied that sufficient ground has been out for extension of the time to surrender. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners is required to be considered on the date that the petitioners surrender keeping in mind that they were granted anticipatory bail but could not surrender, without being prejudiced by the present order. Let this order be communicated to the Court of C.J.M, Katihari in Complaint case No. 843 of 2006 by Fax at the cost of the petitioners. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar