1 32 caf.73.11 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2007 Kamalakar Kashinath Vaity. ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent ------ Mr. Krishna N. Kore for the Applicant. Mr. A.R.Pati, AGP for the Respondent. ------ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 25 th January, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. The Applicant is the claimant before the Reference Court. If there is no stay granted by this Court in the first appeal, the Applicant can always execute the award and therefore, prayer clause (a) cannot be granted. As far as prayer clause (c) is concerned, the appeal will have to be added to the final hearing board as per its turn. 2 32 caf.73.11 2 Hence, application is disposed of by passing the following order: i. If the execution of the impugned award has not been stayed by this Court, it will be open for the Applicants to execute the award ; ii. As far as the second prayer is concerned, the appeal shall be added to the final hearing board as per its turn ; iii. Civil Application disposed of. The appeal shall be shown on daily board on 21 st February, 2011 under the caption “directions”. [ A.S.OKA, J ]