1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3034/2009 IN F.A.ST. NO.3949/2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3036/2009 IN F.A.ST. NO.3952/2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3038/2009 IN F.A.ST. NO.3955/2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Shri V.D. Rakh, Advocate for petitioners. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J Date : 26 th February, 2010. 1 By order dated 20/11/2009, hearing learned A.G.P. and particularly the delay being of 486 days, notices were directed to be issued to the respective claimants / respondents. Such notices are served however, unfortunately there is no participation. 2 The award recorded by learned Civil 2 Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad in the group of matters is questioned by the State, alleging that the learned reference court has exceeded the limits by awarding exorbitant amounts of compensation divorced from the sale instances or prevalent market price, on the date of notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. 3 After getting the judgment and award dated 24/07/2007, copy application was made, draft appeal memo was prepared on 14/03/2008. However, certified copies were not issued. Consequently, communication was effected. There was delay in issuing certified copies. Thereafter, copy of judgment was received on 17/01/2009 and hence, delay. Though there appears delay of 486 days however, delay is sufficiently explained and hence condoned. Respective applications for condonation of delay are allowed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J) tsk/ca3034.09