ash 1 caa-422.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 422 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.453 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.P. Wachasundar for the Applicants. Shri Arun Siwach i/by S.K. Legal Associates for Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE :11TH MARCH, 2011 P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicants. The notice repeatedly published by this Court clearly records that the production of papers is allowed only if the parties are seeking urgent relief. In this application, there is no urgent relief claimed. 3. The order passed by the Apex Court reads thus:- “.....Having regard to the facts of the case, the ash 2 caa-422.11 prayer, as made, is granted. If any application for expeditious hearing of the appeal is made, the same may be considered on its own merits.” 4. Notwithstanding the said order, in Paragraph 2 of the Civil Application, the Applicants have made a statement that the Apex Court has disposed of Special Leave Petition with a direction to this Court to expedite the hearing of this Appeal. Learned counsel appearing for the Applicants fairly submits that the statement made in the application is incorrect. The Appeal is of the year 2010. There are very old Appeals pending in this Court for final hearing. Therefore, no peremptory date of hearing can be fixed today for the Appeal of the year 2010. 5. The prayer for fixing a peremptory date is rejected. However, in the light of the order of the Apex Court, the hearing of the Appeal is expedited. The Application is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J)