HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8759 of 2011 Date : 01.04.2011 Between : Sri Ramalingeswara Weaker Section Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Hyderabad, rep. by its Founder and Chief Functionary. …..Petitioner And The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8759 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 5 on the complaint made against the 6th respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner, who claims to be the founder and Chief Functionary of a Co-operative Society, has filed a complaint before the Station House Officer, Raidurg Police Station on 21.01.2011 against the 6th respondent. It is his grievance that inspite of making such complaint, no steps are being taken by the Police against the 6th respondent. I have perused the copy of the complaint stated to have been filed by the petitioner before the Police on 21.01.2011. It is stated in the complaint that the Government has allotted an extent of 99 acres of land in Survey Nos.32 to 40 of Gachibowly village and an extent of 31 acres in Sy.No.159 of Dommaiguda, for the purpose of allotting to the poor people. It is stated that they have levelled the said land and made house sites and allotted 60/100 square yards each to the members of the petitioner-Society, but the 6th respondent herein went to the said land on 03.11.2010 and threatened the members of the petitioner-Society to vacate the land and hand over the vacant possession to him. Even taking the contents of complaint to be true, there are no cognizable contents for registering a crime against the 6th respondent, and the dispute appears to be purely of civil nature. If there is any interference with the land of the petitioner, it is for the petitioner-Society to approach competent civil Court for obtaining appropriate orders, but no directions can be granted in this writ petition, to register a crime against the 6th respondent, based on the aforesaid allegations. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 1st April 2011 ajr