IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.23563 of 2004 Between: Pavana Sutha Chary S/o. Ramalingam R/o.Jangapalli Village, Bejjenki Mandal Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue officer, Bejjienki Mandal Karimnagar Distlrict. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authority in not entering the petitioners name in all the Revenue Records as pattadar and possessor of the land admeasuring 0.53 cents in Sy.No.54 of Jangapalli Village of Bejjenki Mandal, Karimnagar District even though the respondent authority himself granted patta to the petitioner in the year 1993 and even though the petitioner filed an application on 15.4.2004, is arbitrary, illegal and violative of the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbook Act, and consequently direct the respondent authority to enter the name of the petitioner as pattadar and possessor of the land admeasuring 0.53 cents in Sy.No.54 of Jangapalli Village of Bejjenki Mandal, Karimnagar District considering the representation of the petitioner dated 15.4.2004 in all the Revenue Records maintained by the respondent authority. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he made a representation on 15.04.2004 before the respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer seeking to enter his name as pattadar and possessor of the land admeasuring 0.53 cents in Survey No.54 of Jangapalli village of Bejjenki Mandal, Karimnagar District in all the revenue records maintained by the respondent authority, but, so far the same is not being considered. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Both the counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission. Since the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2004 is said to be pending consideration before the respondent, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent- Mandal Revenue Officer to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 17.12.2004 Note: Issue CC in three days. (BO) Nsr/Msv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Mandal Revenue officer, Bejjienki Mandal Karimnagar Distlrict. 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of AP, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. Two CD copies.