Balodabazar Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226,01? THE s . ‘ I I CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA : jig. :A -L ”“ K “W . & - 9 $§ngle Bench ”’3 ‘W/ x IN'lf‘HE HON’BLE HIGH7,COURT‘OF CHHATTISGARH AT § BILASPUR , % g w.P.(-S) No. agob 12009 (s.B'.) (s.B'.) PE'i‘fITIONER z’Ié-mant Kumar Varma, S/o, I I Late Shr‘i Bhimendra Kum’ar ‘ Varma, a‘ged ’ab‘out 43 years; Occupatiém — U.D.T, Governmént Boys Middle School ,Bélauda Bazar, Disfct. Raipur (C.G.) ‘V ; VERSUS ' RESPONDENTS / I : 1‘; /State of" Chhattisgarh 1 xé&\€§>//\ V Through - Secretary K)¢)\%’)(1X%w« Education, Department, aW3? 3 D K S Bhawan Raipur, ‘ M Q$i§m®i > H I Dlstt Ra1pur (C G) wgw‘5'...... " ' . 2 Chlef Executwe Officer, I , V V . t r Z1la Panchayat, Raipur " ’ Distt. Raipur (C.G;) 3. Bistrict Education Officer Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge -HC 78 @é,\o%\g6) mm w P.C.D ('13 v 200 j mm (W) mm aft?! 311w ms‘aahma 11‘ 1wm : %? W 311%?! SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PR1 TINKER DIWAKER 12.8.2009 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, PL. for the State. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the V present 15etition with liberty to fiie representation before respondent V No.2 raising all his grievances against the impugned transfer order dated 6.08.2009. He however su bmits that the said authority be directed to decide the representation so made expeditiously. ,\ Counsel for the Statehas no objection if the representation of the petitioner is decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of filing representation by the petitioner Within a period of ten de ys from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same is expected to be decided Within a further