1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD)No.14201 of 2011 1 VETTAIYAN @ SUBRAMANIAN 2 MURALAI KANNAN 3 KRISHNAN 4 BALA 5 CHELLAPANDI 6 ARUNKUMAR 7 VIJAYA 8 MURUGESHWARI 9 SENTHIL 10 ASWIN 11 JEYAKUMAR 12 JEYARAJ 13 SELVAM 14 PRABAKARAN 15 GEETHA :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.18 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODALPUTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR.NO. 466/2011. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.SENTHIL KUMAR,Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 355, 307, 506(ii) and 379 I.P.C. in Crime No.466 of 2011, on the file of the respondent-police, have come forward with this application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due to previous motive, the petitioners/accused attacked the de-facto complainant. He further submits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and there is a case and counter case between the both parties. He further admits that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai and each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:IV, Madurai. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Koodalputhur police Station, Madurai District. +1. CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.38379. RP/09.11.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14201/11. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/