IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4492 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- MADHUSUDAN M SHUKLA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BK OZA for Petitioner MR HL JANI for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 11/03/97 ORAL JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner prays for writ, direction or order as under: "(A) directing the respondent State Government to extent the benefit of the Government Resolution No.LGS 1068.A dated 18.2.1975 whereby it was resolved and directed to transfer by way of sale on hire purchase basis the quarters occupied by the occupants in `H' and `L' colonies to the petitioner as well; (B) directing the respondent to transfer to the petitioner by sale on hire purchase basis the quarters in Government Blocks at `K' colony, Ahmedabad; (C) granting such other and further reliefs and passing such other and further orders as the circumstances of the case may require..." 3. The learned counsel for the respondent, relying on the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 9.4.96, made in the case of K.C. Parekh & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors., in S.L.P. No.13867-68/92, contended that the petitioner has no right whatsoever for transfer of the quarter on hire purchase agreement. I have gone through the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and I find therefrom that liberty has been given to the petitioners therein to make a fresh representation to the State Government or to appropriate authority in the matter and further directions were given to the State Government, in case such a representation is made, to consider the same within a reasonable time and take a decision. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that this writ petition may also be disposed of in the same terms. 4. In the result, this Special Civil Application is disposed of in terms that in case the petitioner makes a representation in the matter, to the respondent No.1, the same may be considered and decided by the State Government in accordance with law, within a reasonable time, say within six months from the date of receipt of the same. 5. The Special Civil Application is disposed of with aforesaid directions. Rule stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. .......