.^3") HIGH COURT QF CIfflATTI8<MRH ATBILASPtJR PETITIONERS WMT PETITION (S) No. 1456 of2008 : 1. Smt. Juga Sahu Wife of Shri Shri Dharmuram aged about 50 yea3^, Assistasit Teacher, m th^ Primary School Karaga, Block Kumd, Di^trict Dhamtari (C.G.) 2. Smt. Shak.uiitala Sahu wife of Shri Chaiidra Kumar Sahu, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, m the Navin Primary School Ghatapara, Block Kumd, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. Saijuram Sahu Son of Shri Bhagat Ram Saliu, aggd about 47 years, Assistant Teacher in tte PFms^ry School Chataud, Block Kumd, District Dhafatan (C.G.) 4. Salibram Sahu Son of Sfari Harirani Sahu, aged aJbart 50 years, A^sistaiit Teacher in the Primary School Mandraud, Block Kumd, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhaweui, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Imtmctions Directorate, Ralpur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, Dli^srtari, Distriot Dhamtan, (C.O.) 4. Tlw Block Education Officer, Kui-ud, Distiict Dhamtari, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U-NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTn'LmON OF INDIA SB:HQn'Me Sliri Satish K. Asnihotri. J. Present: Shri M.K.Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Sniita Ghai, Panel Lawyer fortie StaWrespoftdeiits. ORALORDER (Passed on 05m day of March, 2008) RESPONDENTS The petitioners were appomted vide order dated 01.04.1998, 30.12.1997, 01.04.1998 and 30.12.1997, respectively on probatton for a period oftwo years as Assistairt Teacher on a ftxed pay of RB. 1200/-. After completion offheir probation, the petitioners were ^-anted regular pay scale. Leamed coimsel appearing fbr the petstioners sitbmits ffciat the isgue mvolved.in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regiilar pay scale with efFect from fhe date ofmitial appoiiitment or after completion ofprobationperiod. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the parties joisrtly submJt that the facts and question of law involved m fhe preseot writ petition are sqiiarely covered by fhe. decision ofttiis Court m fhe case offfar I^ssad£^wre others vs, State of Chhattisgarh and others (Writ Petition (S.) No.5191 of2006), dated 3.10.2006. For the afbrementioiied reasom, the writ petition is disposed ofmterms ofthe decision ofthis Court m the matter of Har Pra^ad Kwre and oth^s vs. State ofChhattisgarh and others (Supra). Tlie petitioners are allowed to make a representation within a period oftwo weeks from today to respondeot No.l, raising all their grievances and, m iuni. respondent No.l shall decide the said rq)r@ser[tatioti m asi ebjectiw manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of sucfa represeiitation, after considermg ail fhe poinfs raised by the petitioners and taking into account fhe order dated 31-1-2000 passed by the teamed State Admmistrative Tribunal. Jabalpur, m Origmal Applicatioii No. 1452 of 1998, and ifthe petitioners stand on tbe same fi)otmgs, as ttie petitioners m the Original Application No. 1452 of 1998, theil fhey bealso sanctioned fhe same pay-scale and semority, The writ petition is accordmgly dlsposed ofwith the afbresaid direction, subject to verification ofthe fects. No order as to costs, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Armt