1 (Appln 4961 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4961 OF 2010 Ramawadh Sitaram Yadam & Ors. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.Shonak Mehta for Applicants Mr.Jayant Bandeskar i/b. Mr. A.K. Bhosale for Respondent No.1 Mr.K.V. Saste -APP for State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, & A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED: 12 th October, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants, Respondent No.2 and the learned APP for the State. 2. This application is filed under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing and setting aside the FIR which is registered vide C.R. No.72 of 2007 registered at the Kurar Police Station, Mumbai for the offences punishable under sections 141, 143, 144, 147, 149, 323, 324, 326 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It is submitted that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant has no objection if the FIR is quashed. We have also asked the 2 (Appln 4961 of 2010) learned APP to keep all the persons, who were injured, present in the Court and further directed him to enquire whether they have no objection for quashing the FIR. 4. The learned APP has interviewed these five injured persons and has stated that all these persons have also no objection if the complaint is quashed. We have also asked the learned APP to produce the injury certificates in respect of all the injured witnesses. The injury certificates clearly show that these injuries which were sustained by these witnesses are of a simple nature though an offence under sections 323, 324 and 326 r/w. 149 of IPC is registered against the present Applicants. The Respondent No.2 who is the Original Complainant, also has filed an affidavit in reply stating therein that he has no objection if the proceedings are quashed. 5. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab [(2008) 4 SCC, 562], since the dispute between the parties is of a personal nature, there is no impediment for quashing the said complaint. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 9(a). Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. (A.M.THIPSAY J.) (V.M. KANADE J.)