IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 654 of 2011. Decided on 26th April, 2011. Jai Bharti College of Education. …Petitioner. Versus The Regional Director, Northern Regional Committee (NRC) & another. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner submits that NCTE has granted letter of intent to the petitioner. Therefore, it is prayed that the second respondent may be directed to inspect the school and take follow up action. Learned counsel for the second respondent submits that no intimation has been received from the first respondent so far. The petitioner will produce a copy of the letter of intent received from the NCTE before the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will take necessary follow up action and further steps as per the policy of the Government. The needful in this regard shall be taken within a period of two weeks from the date of 2 production of the copy of letter of intent along with a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th April, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.