IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 33995 of 2011 (O&M) Virsa Singh .. Petitioner versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Amar Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal, J. The number of case as mentioned on the petition is 'Criminal Misc. No. M-___ of 2011' whereas the nomenclature was changed to 'Criminal Misc. -M No. ____ of (year)' way back in July 2007. The registry has also casually passed the petition despite earlier warnings by this court. The official who has passed the present petition should be asked to explain for not taking care of the instructions and the amendment carried out in the nomenclature of the criminal petitions. Registrar Judicial to do the needful. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one for the same relief after correcting the clerical errors. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The registry, however, shall comply with the direction regarding explanation of the official concerned. 15.11.2011 ( Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge