IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3717 of 2009 RAMANAND MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is apprehending arrest in Complaint Case No. 389 of 2008 under section 323, 406 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Based on the allegation made in the complaint case other co-accused has been enlarged on bail. But for the reasons recorded in the impugned order the prayer for bail of the present petitioner has been rejected indicating that he has snatched Rs. 500 from the pocket of the complainant. Submission is that the said difference is no difference specially when the origin of the case relates to the land dispute or sale and purchase of the same. Taking into the nature of the allegation and the fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Ramanand Mandal in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below concerned within four weeks, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 389 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)