IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-6566 of 2008 Date of decision : 06.07.2009 Ramphal and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Sanjay Majithia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana for the respondent-State. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 had paid the entire amount due against him to the bank. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Mahavir Singh does not dispute this factual averment. In view of the above, order dated 14.03.2008 passed by this Court granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 1 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, in respect of petitioner No. 2, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has received no instructions. Accordingly, petition in respect of petitioner No. 2 stands dismissed. 06.07.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE