IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17834 of 2011 ============================ Madan Manjhi, Son of Sakhichand Manjhi, resident of Village- Gawandari, P.S.- Thawe, District- Gopalganj .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Collector, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. 2. The Sub Divisional Officer, District- Gopalganj. 3. The Block Development Officer, Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj. 4. The District Supply Officer, Gopalganj. 5. The Block Supply Officer, Manjhagarha, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Respondent/s 2/ 30.11.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S., prays for quashing notice contained in Annexure-2, whereby he has been directed to refund about 500 quintals of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Scheme at A.P.L. rate. The petitioner submits that it would appear from Annexure- 2, prepared by D.R.D.A., Gopalganj that petitioner has deposited maximum of the rice allotted between 2002 to 2006. He further submits that for the year 2006-07 and 2007-08, the authority has only taken into consideration the quantity allotted and has not shown the quantity that was distributed by him. He further submits that the quantity shown in the impugned charge is heavy. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 10% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. The petitioner would file a detailed representation before the respondent authority within six weeks, who would dispose of the same within a further period of 10 weeks. This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 10%. Uday /- (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)