1 CP 275/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO.275 OF 2011 ,In WP/4037/1999 SHASHIKALA KISHANRAO MANKESHWAR VERSUS SWAMI VIVEKANANDA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Deshpande Ajay S. And Manjusha Deshpande Advocate for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.Milind Patil-Beedkar; Mr.SR Jaiswal, Adv. h/for Mr. RJ Godbole, Adv. for Resp.No.3 ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard Mr. Deshpande. He submits, the order of this Court dated 16th August, 2010 in WP No.4037/1999 is partly complied with, however, the second benefits available to the petitioner under time scale salary/promotion scheme, are not extended by the management. 2) Mr.Patil submits, this is altogether a different issue, will not fall within the bracket of the orders passed in the writ petition. Mr.Patil further submits that pursuant to joint meeting between the petitioner, management and 2 CP 275/2011 Education Officer, proposals for arrears of salary of the petitioner were sent to the Education Officer and they are processed. Still left over arrears in time scale promotion or extension of benefit, it can be attended to, if appropriate representation is made by the petitioner to the management and copy thereof is served to the Education Officer. 3) Mr.Deshpande accepts to this proposal and petitioner will independently make a representation within a week from today. 4) The follow up action from the respondent, naturally, should be in time frame considering the spirit of the earlier orders in the writ petition. 5) In the light of above situation, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/