: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION NO.2541 OF 2005 NO.2541 OF 2005 NO.2541 OF 2005 Kasat Paper and Pulp Mills Ltd. ... Petitioner V/s. Kasat Paper Mill Kamgar Sanghatana ... Respondent Mr.V.P. Sawant for Petitioner Mr.N.A. Kulkarni for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: AUGUST 18, 2005 AUGUST 18, 2005 AUGUST 18, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The impugned order challenges an interim order passed in the complaint filed under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act. The complaint has been filed for various reliefs including payment of wages from March 2003 to May 2003. The Industrial Court has found that the amount should be paid to the employees who are the members of the complainant union. 2. In my view, there is no need to interfere with the order of the Industrial Court except by modifying the same by directing the Petitioners to deposit the amount in the Industrial Court. Once the amount is deposited, the Industrial Court shall invest the same initially for a period of six months, to be renewed : 2 : thereafter. The complainant union will provide a list of their members as the Industrial Court has directed the Petitioner to pay only those employees who are the members of complainant-union. 3. The findings of the Industrial Court in the interim application are absolutely prima facie, and they shall not reflect on the final decision on merits. 4. Writ Petition is disposed off accordingly.