In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M-18052 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Aug 02,2011 Abhinav Sharma and another --Petitioners vs. State of Haryana --Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.K.S.Rupal,Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Sagar Deswal,AAG,Haryana. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that marriage of petitioner No.1 with Arti Sharma was solemnized on 22.1.1999. The complainant lodged FIR No. 606 dated 28.12.2009 under Section 498A- IPC. Police Station, Civil Lines, Gurgaon, in which a compromise was effected on 4.1.2010 (Annexure P2) and the complainant sworn an affidavit on 17.11.2010 (Annexure P-3) about the compromise. Petitioner No.1. then filed CRM-M-24268 of 2010 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,'Cr.P.C.') for quashing of the FIR and that petition was allowed by this Court vide order dated 17.11.2010. However, after a period of four months, the complainant again registered the present FIR under Section 498-A/34 IPC . Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in terms of the order of this Court dated 03.6.2011, the petitioners have joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel on instructions received from ASI Shamsudin. Learned counsel for the complainant argued that recoveries are yet to be effected. CRM-M-18052 of 2011 -2- Be that as it may, the petitioners earlier registered the FIR and compromised the matter on the basis of which the FIR has been quashed, I do not find it to be fit case for further custodial interrogation of the petitioners. In view thereof, the order dated 03.6.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. Aug 02,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge