Civil Revision No.304 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.304 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision 25.03.2009 M/s New Standard Engineering Co. Ltd. ......Petitioner VERSUS Native Steels & Alloys Private Limited and another ......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 09.12.2008, passed by Civil judge (Senior Division), Patiala, refusing to lead Additional evidence by way of proving the complete copy of customer's copy of the order dated 05.09.1996 (Annexure P-7), produced by the petitioner-defendant (herein referred as 'the petitioner'). Admittedly, document Ex.P7 has been produced by the plaintiff and proved by petitioner-defendant, but despite due diligence, it could not be detected if it was a complete document of the original, as such he has moved an application for producing the complete document on the record because as per clause 8 of the document mentioned over leaf confers jurisdiction to try the matter over the competent Court at Bombay and no other Court. Heard. It may be mentioned that plaintiff-respondent appears Civil Revision No.304 of 2009 (O&M) 2 to have not come to Court with clean hands for not producing the complete document of Ex.P7 thereby keeping the defendant in dark. He produced photocopy of the front page of Ex.P7 and not the back page. As such, in the peculiar circumstances, in order to provide complete justice to the parties and also to avoid mis-representation, this Court needs to interfere while exercising the powers under Section 227 of the Constitution of India by permitting the defendant to prove the complete document of Ex.P7. The petitioner does not want to examine any other document or lead any other evidence. Consequently, I allow this petition to lead additional evidence for proving the document Ex.P7, subject to payment of Rs.2,000/- as costs. However, if the original is in possession of respondent, then the same could be produced from him. March 25, 2009 (A.N.JINDAL) mamta-II JUDGE