IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 444 OF 2005 MAPUSA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ....Petitioner ITS CHIEF OFFICER, MAPUSA GOA. Versus GOA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD ....Respondents THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND ANR., Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni with Shri H. D. Naik, Advocates for the Petitioner. Shri J.E. Coelho Pereira, Sr. Advocate with Shri J. Godinho, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Shri S.S. Kantak, Ag With Ms. L. Dharwadkar, Aga for the Respondent No.2. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 9th January, 2006 P.C.: Heard. In view of what has transpired in the course of the hearing, the learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.1 has fairly stated that the letter dated 17th August, 2005 which is impugned in the petition shall be treated as show cause notice to the petitioner and the petitioner may file reply to the same within a period of two weeks and thereafter after hearing the petitioner and any other person interested in the matter, the respondent No.1 will take appropriate decision in the matter. We accept the said statement and in view of the said statement, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition. Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn while accepting the said statement. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the issues involved in the matter. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. sl.