IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2177 of 2011 RAKESH CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE PARMESHWAR CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2299 of 2011 KUNAL KUMAR SAHNI, SON OF GOPAL PRASAD SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.03.2011 Both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases arise out of Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 282 of 2010 registered under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and accordingly, both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases are being disposed of by this common order. Petitioners are not named in the First Information Report and during course of investigation their names surfaced in this case. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that none of the person has claimed to have seen the petitioners committing the alleged crime and except the confessional statement of co-accused Rajesh Sahini @ Bhutali there is nothing against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that so far as the paragraphs, referred by learned Additional Sessions Judge in his impugned order are concerned, the same are nothing but only the stereo type statements of the prosecution witnesses without naming the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Patna in connection with above stated Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 282 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)