IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38610 of 2009 CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 01/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Considering the nature of the allegations under Sections- 387, 452 and 506/34 of I.P.C., this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail on the submission that he was a Lab Technician in the hospital in which the informant was a doctor and that the professional dispute between them has been given a different colour to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits on the day that he surrenders in light of their being workers in the same hospital, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)