WP(C) 5397/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K.SHARMA Heard Mr.S.K.Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. R. Chakraborty , learned State counsel for the respondents. The petitioner is the aspirant for the post of Anganwadi Worker. Her grievance is that the authority, i.e. the CDPO(respondent No.4), has select ed the private respondents although they do not belong to the Anganwadi Centre. This is a disputed question of fact. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of providing tha t the petitioner may within one week from today may submit representation to the respondent No.2, i.e. the Director of Social Welfare, Assam agitating her griev ance as reflected in the writ petition. In the event of making such representation, the said authority s hall decide the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. The pe titioner may also enclose the copies of the writ petition along with the represe ntation. In the event of making appointment to the post of Anganwadi Work ers during the pendency of the aforesaid exercise, same will be subject to furth er order to be passed by the Director of Social Welfare.