XI-HC—78 '3~^r'^TPTRT^, ^ti1<H^i<o, [®t<ni<H^< T **W^[ yhW«h '^200 3TT^?T TT^R* ((ic<il<sl<^) ^^T^T'^T f<-lJch ^T^T 37T^T 9FRW .[.:- ^<TTW ^rfiH W^T ^ Writ Petitio Writ Petitiosi Usider Artic] S&TmiGSiEK. ^;.-- —^^i^aft^gCTsys Asiwar J R/Q Cj F<n<j1i ^(^ciii "^f is^ 'tf^ g.K ^3tRR3^?T a iCi No.3596/2008 e 226 of the Constitutioa of ¥2idia yi, S/o Sayyad Ali, about 40 years,' IS; Sector-Sy Devesxdra Nagar Raipyy; Tahsil 45 District Raipur (CG) Region^i Traa^port Autlsority DeK,S» Bhawasi Raipurj Dtetrict Rsiipuy (CG) MISHRA.J 11.G7.SGQ8 Shri Somkaiit Verma, co-4iisel for tlie petitioner, Sliri Siisliil Dubev. Qovt. Heard, V The iastan.t petition has to tlie responclent to cousider] 25.6.2007 for graiit ofregiilai" s| Leaiiied couusel for tlie ^ b^.clv, lor tlie Sta.te, beeu filed by the petitioner for directioii his applicatiou of Annexiire P-1, dated ^age cmiiage 'permit. ctitioner siiDmits tliat eveu alter 1 year, the respoiident has not de,cid|ed the application of tlie petitiouer ni accorclaiice witli law. Leaiiied cozinsei for tlid suitable dti'ectioii is isstiecl to I ofthe petitioner ui accordaiice ^iih law. In view of the above s| pailies, the iiistaiit pefitioii respoudent t.o decide me appU<| respoudent/ State has no objection if \l~i€ respondent to decide the application Libmissions of leaiiied couusel for tlie |s disposecl of with a dii'ection to the ^ation ofAnnexure P-1, dated 25,6,2007 subm.itted by the petitioner wit|iui a periocl of2 montlis froBi the clate of receipt/' production of copy of t4is order ui accordaiice wit.il law. \fc^ Sd/- ^dra^V^fa 3uA6e