HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Review Petition No.81 /2007 PETITIONER Prem Das, aged about 65 yeaJS, S/ o Jhangua Satnanu‘, Ex— workcharged regular Mazdoor, R/o Village Khapri, P.O. Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.) Versu s ESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, R Through Secretary, Public Works ‘ Department , (Building 6a Roads), Manualaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, P.O. 8r, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 Executive Engineer, Public Works ‘ Department (Building and Roads), P.O. Bemetara, Disin‘ct Durg (Cd) Sub-Divisional OEcer, Public Works Depaxtment, P.O. Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) Appearance : Shn' B.R. Ghosh, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajendta Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State. oRAL ORDER . 113.02.20031 SUNIL KUMAR $INHA, J, Heani. This Review Petition has been uled for modiucation of the order dated 31. 10.2007 passed in W.P. No‘2155/ 2003. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was a Gangman, who was superannuated pn'or to completion of 62 years of age, therefore, W.P. No.2155/2003 was liled. In the said Writ Petition, a prayer for back wages and other service benents were also made on the ground of calculating the same as per the date of retirement of the petitioner on completion of 62 years of his age. He also submits that though the petition has been allowed in term of the order dated 4/ 1/2007 passed in W.P. No.108/2005, in which, the age of superannuation, of the V 2 Rev. P. No.81l2007 Gangman has been held as 62 years, but the department is not providing consequential beneets. He prays that this peu'tion may be permitted to be Withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to Es a fmsh petition on the strength of the order dated 31.10.2007 for service benefits, which the petitioner would get as per his age of superannuation as 62 yeaIS. The prayer appeam to be genuine. This Review Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. 2 Sd!— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge \nrt K