1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3731 OF 2008 Mr. Samsher Ibrahim Jakate .. PETITIONER VERSUS Mr. Mohamad Rafik Yusufbhai Jakate & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Harshad Padalkar, Advocate holding for Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 5 th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Petitioner raises challenge to the order passed by the Revenue authority in respect of recording of mutation entries. It has been pointed out that there are civil disputes pending between the parties in the shape of Regular Civil Suit nos. 118/1991, 95/1991 and 130/2003 before the Court of Civil Judge, J.D. Shrigonda. 2 It is established that the revenue entries are recorded for fiscal purposes and are not evidence of title claimed by the parties in relation to 2 the agricultural properties. Right, title and entitlement of the parties is required to be determined in the pending civil litigation and the revenue entries which are recorded would obviously be subject to determination of rights by the civil court. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for in the writ petition. Writ petition therefore stands rejected summarily. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp3731.08.odt