^-i" IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDIC^TURE AT BILASPUR CHHATnSGARH W.P. N0. t^^ /2005 PETmONER RESPONDENTS: 1] L^<:-% [.••*' ..<••**(' ^^.^^ ^y~...-••^/^ ---3] ^•••••y^/ ^•s... ^w '^ ^ Azhar Hasan S/o. Maksud Hasan, Aged about 27 years, R/o. Lakhagarh, Pifhora, Tahsil & Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) ^ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, irough Secretary, Panchayat & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) S.D.O. Revenue, Mahasainund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 4] Chief Executive & Block Development Officer, Pithora, Tahsil & Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) • 5] Tularam S/ o. Sadhram, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Lakhagarh, Vikaskhand, Pithora, Tahsil & Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) WMT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 22^227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INTDIA r XI-HC-22 f ^ / ^ 35ET .<|]<<|(1<|, ®T(1u'16,IfCll'yy 3fi^l <^ae^ " /. '41*<rtri»)HTcR..!^..l. .i^: 3:D^T^iT f^iRjsn^r g;qiti7gf?tr ^-.s ^'- tt.\ ; .^ :-^wL^_A 1» 'it^^' ail^l ^WIWtlf?(T ' T.8.200S Shri Manoj Paranjpe, c Shri Sunil Otwani, P.L Heard. Learned counsel for petitioner was removed fro|m the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Lakhagarh under Adhiniyam, 1993 by the $.D.0. (Revenue), Mahasamund, against which the petitione with application for grant (f)! stay, which is pending before the Collector, Mahasamund the application of the petiti order dated 14.3,2005, theritfore, the Collector be directed to decide the appeal at the e^ for the respondent has no ofl Vide order dated 31. parties to maintain status q) Having heard learned having regard to the facts respondent No.S-CoIlector i| filed by the petitioner with| today and till then the p| status quo as per the Court'l With the direction disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)I] also stand disposed of. Certifed copy as per ri^ q)i<<Fci41'f Hi*iciTfftec^<fai<'y< ^arf^R'an^T lounsel for the petitioner. for the State. he petitioner submits that the Section 40 of the Panchayat Raj r has preferred an appeal along However, the Collector rejected 3ner for staying the operation of rliest, to which learned counsel ijection. 3.2005 this Court directed the .10. counsel for the parties and and circumstances of the case, s directed to decide the appeal n a period of two months from irties are directed to maintain 3 order dated 31.3,2005. aforesaid, the petition stands No.947/05 8s I:A.No.2309/05 les. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge -1~-.