1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil Revision Application No. 106 of 2006 [M/s. Balaji Developers Vs. Smt. Saraswati B. Agrawal] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M. Anilkumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.S. Shrimali, Advocate for the respondent sole. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 22nd November,2007. 1. Heard. 2. The objection raised in the Written Statement to the maintainability of suit as well as application under Order-VII, Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, do not demonstrate that from reading of the plaint, it would reveal that the suit was barred by law and hence would be liable to be rejected under Clause [d] of Rule 11 of Order-VII, Civil Procedure Code. 3. In these premises, the application objecting the suit was without any foundation, and has been rightly rejected. The order is not 2 shown to have been passed without adverting to facts or law. No interference is called for. Revision Application is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|