/ DEDELLANT EON— ApPLICANT , ‘ "PONDEEV v APPLICANTE ‘ VW£Q kb§2o3~ & § " . .Noo i. , r / 223g /2oo3. VERSU$ Jaiswal, aged 35 years, Occupation Moi Talab para Jagdalpur ,Dist. Bastar (C.G. )I «. Guadu S/o Suduram alias Khediram aged @bout 26 years,Caste Bhatara R/O Totapara Balikonta ,Disttv ’gastar (C. G” ) . k“; APPEAL U/$ 3O OF TEE 'WGRMVIEN COI‘QP__EJN$ATION ACT,£2£ a’éw IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR El AT EILASPUR (C.G. ) $ f :x/shiv Kumar Jaisgwal,S/o Mewalal Scraps sale and purchage R/o t : “‘13. 08.2003 shri Subash Yadav. nsel ' for? the appellant. Counsel prays for time remove the defaults. Twoweeks time ,is r‘x‘ized t0°remve the defauLt pointed by the Office. lin‘g which .e this appeal liable to be dismissed for n0 n wompllance without furthe re£ { « COU to gra as fai. is erence to the Bench. > ( a sdl- M Fakmuddin 2 Judge ‘ v I /\ \ \ , r / XLHc—22 AK 3H2 m W z r‘ ' m ‘ ’ E$Phéz§233§§i§993 200 1 Wigwam ’ mwe‘wfm mmmvfga - amm ‘ XV-OR—lS MA 7/8g/£ M;A.No.288/2003 (Shiv Kumnr Jaiml Vs. Guddu) was listed before fhe Han'ble Caur't an 13-8-2003. On that dun Hon‘ble Court i irec‘I-cd} ihe appellant 1'0 mdw good ‘l'he default wilhln two weeks ‘ falling which this appeal Is hable lo be dlsnussed for non-compliance wrl'hou‘l' furlher reference to ‘l’he Cour-1‘ A per fhe reporf of Filing Clerk (Civil) dated 20-94003 the appellant has no? filed any documents/application relating fo me msianf appeal m be‘l‘ween 13-8-2003 ‘I'o 20-9-2003 Vide no'l'e dared 26-9-2003 Cashier (Juduaal) has also Informed :rhai ihe appellant has no? deposwed any amour} in ihe instant appeal In fhe light of order pused by the Hon'ble Court the appeal l stands dlsmissed without further reference to the Bench. ‘ l Offloe is directed to Inform the counsel for the appellant ccordingly. l V ’ Sd/- mu L) d a