IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 3226 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 19, 2011 Smt. Anju .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. A.N. Jindal, J Service is complete but none has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.2. From the impugned order it transpires that the Execution No.405 was filed on 15.1.2008 claiming maintenance w.e.f. 25.4.2006 to 24.12.2007. Notwithstanding the fact that the recovery of maintenance from 25.4.2006 to 24.12.2007 may be a question of debate, but, apparently, the maintenance from 15.1.2007 to 14.1.2008 appears to be within limitation, as the application was filed on 15.1.2008. In the circumstances, the impugned order requires reconsideration. As such, this revision petition is accepted, the impugned order dated 29.7.2009 is set aside and the trial court is directed to pass speaking order observing as to why the amount of maintenance for the period between 25.4.2006 to 24.12.2007 is not recoverable. September 19, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge