pvr nm1112-appl60 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1112 OF 2011 IN APPEAL (LODG) NO.60 OF 2011 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.239 OF 2010 Creative Healthcare Pvt.Ltd. ...Appellant vs. RPG Life Science Ltd. ...Respondent --- Mr.Mahesh Joshi i/b. Mr.O.P.Soni, for Appellant. Ms.Dipti Panda i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Associates, for Respondent. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 10 th October,2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard. Delay condoned. Notice of motion granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of motion is disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) pvr nm1112-appl60 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (LODG) NO.60 OF 2011 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.239 OF 2010 Creative Healthcare Pvt.Ltd. ...Appellant vs. RPG Life Science Ltd. ...Respondent --- Mr.Mahesh Joshi i/b. Mr.O.P.Soni, for Appellant. Ms.Dipti Panda i/b. Thakore Jariwala& Associates, for Respondent. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 10 th October,2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard. The cause of action accrued in the year 2006. Therefore, the learned Single Judge may be right in saying that when the Company Petition was filed in the year 2010, the claim may be barred by limitation. In our opinion, therefore, the appeal cannot be pvr nm1112-appl60 - 2 - entertained. Obviously, however, the findings of the learned Single Judge will not come in the way of the Appellant filing civil suit and establishing before the Civil Court that his claim is within the limitation. The appeal is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)