0 V P ~ {051/ Q) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP (S) N&Wé/2o11 PETITIONER / Chandra Bhushan Singh Paikara , S/o Shri Samal Sing , aged about 37 years, Presently posted as Upper Division Teacher at Middle School Girari Block .Pendra, Dist— Biiaspur CG ‘ VERSUS W ...... A. R/o Viliage- Jatadevari Post Amadand RESPONDENTS / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh — Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Weifare D.K.S. BhaWan Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare and Development Bilaspur C.G. 3. Block Education Officer Tribal Block Pendra Dist - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Joint Director Accounts, Treasury‘and Pension Raipur Dist Raipur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /@ , HEGH COURT GF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR sg : i-mN’ELE MR. JUSTICE FRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.qsg.No. 6446/2011 PETITIONER Chandra Bhushan Sing‘h Paikara V€YSUS RESPONBENT3 Stata of 0G. 8x; Others Shri A.V.Shridhar on behalf of Shri Y.Chadturvedi: counsel for the petitioner‘ Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G A for the Stato. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CON$TITUTION OF INDIA ORDER. (01. 11.2011) Counsel appoaring for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who was appointed on the post of Assistant 'Teaoher in the year 1993 is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not adding two advance increments in his salary even though he did his D Ed from Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal Bhopal at h1s own cost 1n the vear 2002after seeking permisswn for the same from the department Counsel for the parties do not dispute that the controversy involved in this petition is squarely covered by the order in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadai Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg & Another (2006 (II) MPJR CG.96) & Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Another (W.P.(S) No. 4130/2005). Counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioners’ make a representation, the same will he considered and decided in accordance with law and in the light of the decisions of this Court in the matter of Yashwant kumar Bharadaj (supra) within a pen‘od of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In View of the foregoing, nothing survives in this petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law: considering ally the aspects of the case. I Prit'mker Biwakar Judge Sdl-