THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1903 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioners filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the order dated 18.02.2010 in I.A.No.1714 of 2009 in O.S.No.327 of 2004 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla, in rejecting the said application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to send the disputed thumb marks along with the admitted thumb marks to the Director of Forensic Laboratory, Hyderabad, for comparison. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the suit is one for recovery of money under pro-note. No-where the petitioners’ plea in the main defence is that of total denial. In such circumstances, the question of invoking jurisdiction does not arise. In order to answer such question, the burden exclusively rests with the plaintiff and it does not take any such recourse. The petitioners can as well take the advantage thereof for drawing necessary presumptions therein. In view of the same, I do not find any justification in the revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 18th June 2010 RRB