{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4221 OF 2009 Yeshodabai Dattatraya Mule PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.V.Jadhav Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr.N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr.Bhusahn Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr.Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.3 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 29th September 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 and 2 to grant “Sanman Pension” of Rs.6000/- per month, with arrears, by depositing Rs.1 lac in this Court. Certain ad interim relief is also prayed in this petition. 2. It appears that the husband of the petitioner had filed {2} writ petition No.6636/2008 challenging the order passed by the respondents, rejecting the application filed by the husband of the petitioner seeking freedom fighter’s pension. The aforesaid petition came to be dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court, by order dated 19.12.2008. It appears that this order of the Division Bench of this Court, was not challenged by the husband of the petitioner and, therefore, has attained finality. 3. By the present petition, the petitioner claims to have discovered additional / new material, which was not placed before the respondents, earlier and, therefore, seeks the aforesaid relief. According to us, the present petition is not maintainable. We dismiss this petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to submit appropriate application before the respondents, seeking the relief of grant of freedom fighter’s pension, by producing additional material / evidence. If the said application is filed by the petitioner, the respondents to deal with the same in accordance with law. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid liberty and directions. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/wp4221-09