IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 69 of 2009 Dr. Shailendra Prasad & others ……Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. …Respondents. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 states that he has obtained instructions in continuation of the order passed by this Court on 9.2.2010 and has been instructed to state that the petitioners herein would be entitled to the benefit of concession of 5 years’ age relaxation in terms of the Government Order dated 7.7.2009 appended to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 as Annexure No. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel representing respondent nos. 1 and 2, learned counsel for the petitioner states that on the basis of the relaxation of 5 years’ age conceded by the learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 all the petitioners would be eligible in participating in the process of selection for appointment to the post of Homeopathic Medical Officers, and as such, the instant petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 2 In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. The candidature of the petitioners shall be considered by giving them benefit of age relaxation upto a maximum of 5 years as per the aforesaid Government Order. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J) 11.2.2010 Avneet