// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No.3315/2009 {Mahendra Jajpuria Vs. The State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 11th August, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Deepak Menaria, Counsel for petitioner Shri Mahipal Vishnoi, PP for the State #### By the Court: Learned counsel for petitioner argued that name of petitioner was not mentioned in the F.I.R., however, his name was added during investigation of the matter, but, now, the parties have compromised the matter and the complainant Smt. Pinki Salvi has filed her affidavit dated 16th June, 2009 to the effect that she was not knowing the name of Smt. Vijwanta, Jamna Devi and Mahendra – the present petitioner, and she does not want any action to be taken against the present petitioner; during the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he does not press the bail application under Section 438, Cr.P.C., however, he prays that the learned concerning court below may be directed to // 2 // decide bail application of the petitioner on the same day of his surrender in case he surrenders before it with bail application. The bail application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner surrenders himself before the Special Judge, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Udaipur, within two weeks from today along-with bail application with advance copy thereof to the Public Prosecutor, then the said Court is directed to decide the bail application of the petitioner on the same day. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//