IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1299 of 2007 RAMAYAN CHOUDHARY Versus RAMA NAND YADAV & ORS ----------- 2 22.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the defendant- petitioner. The Court below by the impugned order has rightly rejected the amendment in written statement of the petitioner by taking into account that the suit was filed in the year 1993 in which the plaintiff had already completed their evidence whereafter only such an amendment was sought in the written statement. Infact it would appear that when the turn of the defendant- petitioner came to lead evidence, an application was filed by him for amendment in written statement stating therein that what ever has been stated in course of deposition by the plaintiff is not correct and for that purpose a long amendment in paragraph 25 of the written statement was proposed which on perusal of this court appears to be making out an altogether new case and that too with a design to take away the earlier admission made by the petitioner in his main written statement. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order and consequently, this civil revision application being devoid of any merit is, accordingly, dismissed. shahid (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)