IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1654 of 2006 Chulhiya Khatoon @ Rabia Khato Versus Dalmir Mian & Ors ----------- 6 13-10-2011 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State. By the impugned order the court below in the final decree proceeding has rejected the prayer of the petitioner to implead her as a party and to stay further proceeding of the suit. The petitioner is claiming a share in the property-subject matter of the final decree proceeding- asserting her status to be the grand- daughter of Kariman Mian. However, the said status of the petitioner is still to be established in a properly framed suit for that purpose. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as the petitioner was not a party to the preliminary decree also, therefore a regular suit has been filed claiming her right in the property by way of partition. In view of the aforementioned facts, there is no jurisdictional error committed by the court below in rejecting the prayer of the petitioner. This revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. roy ( V. Nath, J.)