..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1748 OF 2007 Smt.Sushila Ramesh Deshavare. ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.N.G.Bane, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st June, 2007. DATED : 21st June, 2007. DATED : 21st June, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-484 of 2006 of Ambernath Police Station. The said case is under Sections 420, 406, 468 of IPC. 3. The complainant has stated that the present applicant told him that he should give Rs.1,50,000/- and she would get him a job in State Bank of India as a peon. However, though she took the amount, she did not get him a job. It is the prosecution case that the applicant has thus ..(2).. cheated seven other persons whose statements have been recorded including that of one Mahajan. Infact Mahajan has stated that after giving the money, the applicant gave him a document wherein it was stated that Mahajan was called for interview by the Sales Tax Department. Thereafter the applicant also gave him a letter of appointment as a Peon in the school at Vikroli and also a letter of appointment as a Lab Assistant in a school at Shahapur. 4. It is the prosecution case that the interview letter and the appointment letters are all forged documents. Looking to the facts of this case, offence of cheating and forgery is clearly made out against the applicant. The investigation in the present case is going on. Hence, even though the applicant is a lady who is 56 years of age and she is suffering from diabetes, in my view, that cannot be a ground to release her on bail. 5. Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)