IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0M\ OF 2011 PETITIONER ^•/ \^'/ .^^ ^iy' j^y'- Mfv^ SBSPONDENTS .•<r •"" /.'/ -a« s<'''®'&."%>- y ^"•"^ '-^^"% Shiv Bhajan Rain, aged about 40 years, S/o Shri Ramnath Ram., Address U.D.T. Boys Middle School, ^\ Vijay Nagar, Post Vijay Nagar, block Ramchandrapur, District Surguja C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development Department, .D.K.S. Bhavan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Assistant Coniinissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, District Surguja (C.G.). <^.'r'J" 3. Block Education Officer, Block Kusmi, Ramchandraopur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE. •^•^^awsiK-UKU&R; k <^ A^ XI-HC—78 an^T ^T R-li'o d11 SV^ Stlliqi \! -S-5^ ^TpiR.T^, a^Tis, Fsjdiy^ ..M.-.e.^?.i.$i^.^t..i STl^I JWK (1i?f3«'I^T) TRilW ^fCT 311^1 28.07.2011 Shri Raliul Birfharey, ct SIiri Praveen Das, Dy. Q j)unsel for the petitioner. t.A. for the State. Grievance of fhe petitio^ter vide order dated 15.7.2010 Ram.chandiapur to Kusini 3.11.2010 a&d thereafter tlle Vijaynagar, Block Raiachaiid^apur tUl his tiausfer order was at Ramchandrapur but he ba^ Counsel for the petitj permittcd to withdraw tUs issued to the respondent N0| in. accordauce with law. State counsel subiuits been filed by the petitiouer his order he was performi4 sllo represeutatiou. to resp. N0.2 accordauce with law after W^TOi'f iVf^ 4 fsvS TfW^R ^'affiTOsni^i .er ia the present petition is that petitioner was transferred froiu •ever, fhis order was laodi&ed on petitibiser was transferred to ipur. Acconliag to fhe petitioner, L, he was perfonniug his du.ly not been. paid his salary. itjouer submits that he inay be p^tition. However, direction njay be |2 for decidittg his representation Ifhat no docuiaent whatsoever has towine that tiil fhe inodification of his duty at Ratncbandrapur. if the petttioner makes a fresh land the same is beinR decided in of fhe facts. Accorduigly, the petitioti is dismissed as withdrawn wifh fhe afortsaid libcrty. In ttiA eventuality of filiag any fssab representation by the petition.cr wifhiu a period of two weeks B 1i ,^yv XI-HC—78 sn^i qii R-ii'* '(TSTT3iT^T s?)^i°h ^rpn^T, '®TJt?f^,r^diyy 3ti^I 'WK C^?f3»'^q) FOTWBf^iI 3(1^!I fixini fhe date of receipt of cijipy of fhis oidcr, fhe competent authority shaU decide fhe sa4ie after due scrutiny of the facts wifhin a further period of two It is madc clear that tl^is Coiu-t bas not expressed any opniioa on inerits of fhe ca^e and the authority concemed would be at Uberty to dccide fi^ie same in accordaace with law. ^ipiferah •w-f?fl ^ fevfi T?gre?rc ^flfiman^i tuionths in accordauce with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker -^ Judge