IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33443 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ASHOK KORAH ABRAHAM, MANAPPURATH HOUSE, VELOOR.P.O, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).33443/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner operates a regular stage carriage on the route Parippu-Kottayam. Timings in relation to the petitioner's service were settled as per Ext.P1 order on 11.8.2006. Petitioner has now sought for a revision of his own timings on the ground that there has been a change of timings for the subsequent service and for several other services. Petitioner's application, Ext.P2, is to be considered by the RTA. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. 3. Respondent shall first consider whether the petitioner's request as contained in Ext.P2 is maintainable in terms of Section 212 of the Motor Vehicles Act read with Rule 145(7) of the Rules, and if it is so found, then the request may be considered in a timing conference that may be convened in that regard. Respondent shall hear all the objectors and W.P.(C).33443/2008 2 take appropriate decision on the petitioner's request. The entire process shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Copy of the writ petition along with the copy of the judgment shall be produced by the petitioner before the respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs