HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.1561 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both sides. The appellant is the bank which files this appeal inter alia seeking to assail the orders of the learned Single Judge in the writ petition filed by the respondent herein where he sought to assail the impugned orders of terminating his services and ultimately directing the appellants to consider his case for fresh appointment. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent being an employee has been charged with production of transfer certificate and also marks sheet which is found to be false and therefore, after initiating enquiry his services were terminated. Challenging the same, the writ petition has been filed and the learned Single Judge without going into the merits, especially, as to the validity or otherwise of the impugned action, followed the direction given in anther writ petition for fresh consideration. Hence, this appeal. After hearing the learned counsel on either side and also on perusal of the material on record, no doubt, the respondent herein has no right as such which can be enforceable nor would this Court venture to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to give any such direction for fresh appointment as such. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, such direction would only mean to consider his case for fresh appointment, if permissible, within the discretion of the appellant/management. We do not find any merits. Subject to above, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J __________________ Date: 11-08-2009 SANJAY KUMAR, J SKM