THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI W.P.No.16356 OF 2005 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. Writ Petition is filed seeking a declaration that the alleged collusive action of the 2nd respondent with the 3rd respondent as arbitrary and illegal. At the outset, it is to be noted that the petitioner had already made a detailed representation dated 22.07.2005, bringing to the notice of the 1st respondent as to his grievance and requesting to take appropriate action. The said representation is still pending. In the circumstances, I am of the view that it is not necessary for this Court to express any opinion on the merits. In stead, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 22.07.2005 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Needless to mention that before passing such orders, the 1st respondent shall give due opportunity to the writ petitioner, the 2nd respondent as well as the 3rd respondent to put forth their own versions. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ 3rd October, 2005. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.16356 OF 2004 03.10.2005 Between: M/s Sree Vani Engineering Enterprises, represented by Its Proprietor P. Chandra Mohana Rao, D.No.6-6-58/2, Devinagar Colony, Kavadiguda, Secunderabad. .. Petitioner. And The District Collector/ Chairman, Hyderabad District Scheduled Caste Services Co-operative Society, Hyderabad Collectorate Complex Hyderabad and two others. .. Respondents.