IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35039 of 2010 1. SANJAY SAH 2. Bijay Sah both sons of Ramnath Sah & 3. Ramnath Sah son of Late Thakur Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the fact that the petitioners have been summoned under section 319 Cr. P. C., it is ordered that in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within three weeks from today in connection with Sessions Trial No. 586 of 2009, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Chapra, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to 2 initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)