IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Company Petition No.109 of 2003 Prakash S.Ghate ..Petitioner vs. Kirloskar Consultants Ltd. ..Respondents Company Petition No.123 of 2003 Shri Anil Pralhad Wavde ..Petitioner Vs. Kirloskar Consultants Ltd. ..Respondents Ms.Sangita Patil i/b Mr.A.G.Damel for petitioners in both petitions. Mr.M.V.Limaye for respondents in both petitions. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. J. J. 3rd July 2008 3rd July 2008 3rd July 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Limaye states that in both the matters the respondent company has advertised withdrawal in the newspapers pointed out in the affidavit. Thus, there is compliance with the order of this Court. In the light of the fact that steps have been taken by the parties to inform the creditors and contributories and they were at liberty to approach this Court or their Advocate and lodge their claim but none has done so till this date and even till today no claim is put forward, the company petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. No order as to costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)