IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Family Court Appeal No. 115 of 2005 Mrs. Mayura Samir Pawar, Mumbai .. Appellant V/s. Mr. Samir Ramesh Pawar, Mumbai .. Respondent Ms. Smita Surve i/b. M/s. Tamhane & Co. for the Appellant Mr. Suresh Bhosale for the Respondent CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 20.12.2005. DATED : 20.12.2005. DATED : 20.12.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. Both the parties have mutually arrived at a settlement in the above. In fact the present Appeal is challenging the order of nullity granted by the Family Court. By the consent terms, which have been arrived at between the parties, both the parties state that they do not have any claims against each other including claim towards permanent alimony and that the Appellant is withdrawing all allegations against the Respondent. Both the parties have also agreed to withdraw Police complaints made against each other. The said consent terms have been duly signed by the learned Advocate for the Appellant and the learned Advocate for the Respondent, as well as the Appellant and the Respondent. The same is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. The Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the said consent terms. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)