IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31498 of 2011(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SHAREEF, MADATHIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KARALIKONAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691506. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, ELAMAD, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691539. 4. THE SALES TAX OFFICE, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691311. 5. THE MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK, ANCHAL BRANCH, KOLLAM-691311. 6. NAZIMUDEEN, SON OF SHAHUL HAMEED, PUTHENVEETTIL, KARALIKONAM, ARKANNOOR MURI, ELAMAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691539. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASHREE R5 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE, SC., SIB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 31498/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 1274/2007 OF OYOOR SUB REGISTRY OFFICE EXECUTED BY THE SIXTH RESPONDENT INFAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. P2(a):COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DATED 8/11/2006 ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, OYOOR. P2(a):COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE DATED 01-08-2007 ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, OYOOR. P3: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 30-07-2007 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 11-5-2011 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT P5: COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 584/11 DATED 20-10-2011 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31498 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P5, an order passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the application made by the petitioner for mutation under the provisions of the Transfer of Registry Rules. This order is appealable under Rule 18 of the said Rules. Therefore it is up to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedies of appeal. With that liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of . Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge