IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 725 OF 2011 M/S. TARCAR REAL ESTATES PVT.LTD., REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. SANJEEV P. KAMAT TARCAR ... Applicant Versus SMT. SHEUTU SALDANHA ALIAS RUPAWAN SALDANHA AND ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Malkarnekar Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. H. Kankonkar Advocate for the respondent Nos. 32 to 33. Mr. B. Bandekar, Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:- 12th December, 2011 P.C.: Heard Mr. Malkarnekar, learned advocate for the applicant. Although the application is filed by the applicant seeking substituted service upon the Respondent No.16(a) and 23 the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that fresh notice be issued to respondent no.23 at the address mentioned in the application. In view of the statement made by Mr. Malkarnekar, learned advocate for the applicant issue notice to the respondent no.23 at the address mentioned in the cause title. Sofaras the respondent no.16(a) is concerned by separate order passed today in M.C.A. no. 1035 of 2011, notice has been issued to him. The application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. U. V. BAKRE, J. mv