IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.26618-M of 2010 Date of Decision:18.1.2011 Mukesh Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the respondents to properly investigate the case FIR No.533 dated 18.6.2010 under Sections 323,427,148,149,506 IPC P.S. Civil Line, Karnal. Upon notice, reply has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that no reply has been handed over to him. Reply is handed over to him in the Court. As per the reply, investigation was conducted by ASI Ram Bhajan and it was found that the FIR was false, frivolous and accordingly, the Station House Officer, Police Station, Civil Lines, Karnal after verifying the facts of the case wrote a Cancellation report. The said cancellation report was submitted before the trial Court on 25.8.2010. In view the reply filed by respondents No.1 to 4, the present petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all the objections before the trial Court where the cancellation report is pending. The Court shall decide the same in accordance with law. 18.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE