IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. \v’gé 2 /201o. PETITIONER: / Suresh Kumar Shrivas, son of Shivcharan Shrivas, aged about 50 years, Posted as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sindhiya, Block Podi—Uproda, Korba, Chhatisgarh. Versus Respondents / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Secretaly Tribal Welfare Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. /3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. /4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER(S): As mentioned in the Cause title. @Wv" IGH COURT 9F £H$THSGAH AT liASPEi 7 WRIT PEITI0N (S) NO 1368 of 2 Petitioner ”Suresh KumarShnwas; " yeraus: ‘11 ’3 - Rasggndem ‘ -<»Staneof(3hhattisgam&oa1er§ ” WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB Hon'ble Mr Satish K. Agnlhom J ) I Present :‘ bnn KS Pnwar, Mvocate for the petmonéf Shn P K Bhadun, Panel Lawyer for the $tate ” RDER (QRAL) ’ ’ (Passed on 31 ofMamh 2010) With the consent of learned counsel appearing fdr the parties, the petmon Is heard fmally 1. Learned counsel anpeanng for the patrtroner submits that the petrtroner was appomted mutually as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs 156!— ion probation After completion of his probetron penod the petmoner was granted regular pay scale of Rs 169-300t- Learned counsel r’fulther submits that the Issue Involved In the case Is a$o whether the petitioner‘is entitled tofregular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The i‘esue involved herein was considered by: thezMadhya Pradesh State Administrative Trlbunal Jabalpur (for shot! “vie SAT‘; In O A No 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 omels vs State of M P &r others), whereln It wae held that the simllarly eltuated teachers are entitled to regularrpav scale we f the date of initial anpointment The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court The appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholdlnu the declsron of he ‘Frlbunal to me effect that the Teachers/Asslatant Teachers are entitled to regular pay V scale from date of initial appointment; ' V 3; In view of the above submissions made by Ieamed counsel for the. parties, the writ petition Is disposed of On reque§ of the learnedf counsel the petitioner Is granted liberty to make a regesentaaon to the respondent authorrtles,‘ If so advised, to consider his ease and pase appropriate order on its own merit and in Its perspeetive irr the tight of; the order passed by the SAT In Madhukant Yaw (supra) subsequently _ contlrmed by the Supreme Court In Speclal Leave Petition (CIVII) No I 6892/93 13v order dated 3-1 1994 The authonties shall consider and. ‘ /r / / sly V, / pass the order In accordance with iaw expedrtrou ; C _ / W‘s was a . ~ .‘ ‘ I $ sdle hgwow H HR BR T m ’ Arun