i -' 2. Purshottam Mehar, S/o Shri Vishnu Mehar, aged abouf 30 years, R/o Mova, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Indrajeet Singh, S/o M.S. Rehal, aged about 35 years, R/o Pandari, Raipur (C.G.) 5. 6. State of Chhsttisgarh, through Secretary, Co-operative Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, through Sscretary, Home Minlstry, D.K.S. ihawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Chairman, Department of Co- operative, District Raipur (C.G.) The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) The Superintendent of Police, District Raipur (C.G.) Shri P.R. Naik, Former Managing Director, Apex Bank, R/o House No.525, Priyadarshani Nagar, Ring Road, No.1, Raipur, District-Rsipur (C.G.) Shri Pukhraj Jain, S/o Kunwar Lal Jain, aged about years, Manager of Apex Bank, R/o Dawada Coiony, Near Jain fMandir, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) The General Manager, Apex Bank, Raipur, District-Raipur<C.G.) 2 Present: Shri Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Shri Alok NIgam, counsel for the petitioners. Shri MPS Bhatia, Dy GA for the State/respondents. The following order of Oi was oas 2) The petitloners claiming themselves fo be publ spirited persons have filed this writ petition styled as interest Litigation for the following reliefs: "Reliefs: "7.1 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records concerning the cases leading to sanction of loan from the year of 2001 to 2003 for its kind perusai. kindly lasnst ileaal Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to issue a writ directing that suitable action should be taken aasinst ail the officers concern, who went out of the way of sanction the loan to undesirabie and dlsentitied person. 7.4 Any other retief/reliefs which this Hon'ble Court may think fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition may also ptease be granted to the 7.2. This Hon'bie Court may pleased to issue a wr'it directing the No.5 that a sultabie action may be taken ail the persons responsibie for the sanctionina of loan. The petitioners in substance are seeking a direction No.5, Superintendent of Police, District - Raipur to l^ss^^^a^s(^^ ^SMS^iS^i^ ^^^IIS^^S%%%1 r I /y^, I tsaSSfi%i i 1 •vssif' '^ i Y ^/ ^^Ss^" take suitable action on their report against respondents No.6 to 8. 4) If the petitioners are not satisfied taken by the Police on t'neir report, their that the action ies in filina a cnmsnai compiaint in a cn 5) We, therefore, deciine to entertain the writ petition fiied by the petitioners as PIL. 6) The writ petition, therefore, fails and is hereby 7) The security amount of Rs.2,000/- deposited by ioners be refunded to them. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padtna -—ST-TO^'-r