IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.589 of 2011 Date of decision: 23.5.2011. Satpal …Petitioner Versus HPSEB and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner : Mr.Anoop Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms.Anjula Khajuria, counsel for Respondents No.1 to 3. Deepak Gupta, J (Oral) 1. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order whereby he has been transferred from Transmission Division, Una to Transmission Division, Rajgarh. The two grounds raised by the petitioner are that he has been transferred after a short stay and secondly his mother is 85 years old and none else is there to look after her. 2. As far as the first ground is concerned, the petitioner was transferred to Una on 6.10.2008 and has completed more than 2 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 ½ years of service there. The reply filed by the Board also shows that in his entire service except for being posted in Solan at the time of initial appointment for 4 years and for another 4 years remained at Shimla, the petitioner spent 23 years of his service in areas close to Una i.e. Amb, Gagret, Dehra, Nadaun and Hamirpur. 3. No employee has a vested right to remain at one station of his choice. As far as the second ground is concerned, it is not for the Court but the employer to decide such a request. Therefore, the petition is rejected. No costs. May 23, 2011 ( Deepak Gupta ), PV Judge