IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.307 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.475 OF 2008 IN S.C. SUIT NO.395 OF 2008 Mrs.Savitridevi W/o.Shrigopal Kandoi ..Appellant/ Orig.Defendant. Vs. Rajesh Ramavatar Kandoi ..Respondent/ Ori.Defendant. Mr.A.M.Saraogi for Appellant. Mr.K.K.Tated for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008 DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008 DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The impugned order warrants no interference. There is nothing to suggest that the Respondent is in any manner disturbing the use of Room Nos.2, 7 and 8 by the Appellant. Room Nos.7 and 8 are used in common by the Appellant and her cousin. 2. Mr.Tated, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent states that without prejudice to their rights and contentions the Respondent is agreeable to the Appellant and her son using the bathroom shown in Exhibit "A" to the plaint as being used by the Plaintiff only alongwith the said Karuna M. Kandoi who is also in occupation of the room adjoining the same and her family. 3. In view of the statement and in view of the fact that there is no reason to believe that the Appellant’s possession of Room No.2 and use in common of the rooms so specified in Exhibit "A" is likely to be disturbed. No further orders are necessary. 4. The Appeal from Order is accordingly disposed of.