1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9960 OF 2010 Sai Prasad Vyapari Association, Through its Vice Chairman Shri.Aziz Gafoor Shaikh .. Petitioner V/s Pimpri Chinchwad New Township Development Authority, through its Chief Executive Officer and Anr. .. Respondents Mr.A.C.Singh i/by Mr.S.D.Patil for the Petitioner. Mr.V.D.Patil for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.D.Patil, Govt.Pleader for Respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 20TH DECEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 8th December, 2010 issued u/s.53, 53(1), 54, 55 read with section 152 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. By the said notice the petitioner is asked to remove the offending structure within a period of seven days from the receipt of the notice. 2. The said notice has been challenged on various grounds. It is argued by the learned counsel Mr.Singh appearing for the 2 petitioner that the petitioner has already made a representation for regularisation of the said structure. 3. The petitioner is permitted to file an appropriate reply to the notice issued on 8th December, 2010 in accordance with law. Reply should be filed within a period of one week from today. The Chief Executive Officer of Pimpri-Chinchwad New Towship Development Authority, shall decide the said representation within a period of one month thereafter, and shall communicate its decision to the petitioner. 4. Till the appropriate decision is taken on the representation and it is communicated to the Secretary of the petitioner-Association, no further steps for demolition shall be taken by the concerned authority. 5. Subject to what is stated above, petition is disposed of. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR. J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)