- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. jmi SUIT NO.125 OF 1990. Ali Hasan Mohd. Saif Khan & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Tajmohamed Bhashir Mohd. & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr.M.S. Oberoi, i/b. M/s. Ajmerwala & Co., for Defendants. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD MARCH, 2009 : 23RD MARCH, 2009 : 23RD MARCH, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By an order dated 16th March 2009, this Court had recorded the statement of the Advocate for the plaintiffs viz. that the plaintiffs are not giving instructions to the Advocates for the plaintiffs since 1993 and have not shown any interest in prosecuting the suit. However, on 16th March 209, the plaintiffs were present in Court. The suit was therefore, directed to be placed for ex-parte decree on 23rd March 2009 as a last chance. It was made clear that if the plaintiffs fail to proceed with the suit on the adjourned date, i.e. today, for any reason whatsoever, the suit shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. The learned Advocate for the plaintiffs submit - 2 - that after the said order was passed on 16th March 2009, the plaintiffs have not approached them for proceeding with the suit. The plaintiffs are also not present in Court today. 3. In view thereof, it is clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]