IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21230 of 2009 MD.SOHID ALAM @ MD.SHAHID ALAM @ SHAUD @ SHOHID Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 2.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner resides out of State to earn his livelihood. As submitted, the allegation of demand of dowry has been leveled against the petitioner for doing business then only that became pure demand of dowry. In that also a Panchaiti is held but the petitioner or his family members never dared to remain on their demand before Panchaiti because of the reason there was no demand at all, differences were otherwise. The complainant deserted the petitioner herself to fulfill illegal demand. In the facts of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in Complaint Case No. 976 of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)