1 cr-wp-1560-09 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.W.P. NO. 1560 OF 2009 Vidyadhar Balwant Khot and Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Savita Ravindra Khot & Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr. V.N.Shingnapurkar Adv. for petitioners Smt. A.A.Mane APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the petitioners-original accused nos. 2 and 3 and the learned APP for the State. 2 The petitioners are seeking quashing of RCC No. 58 of 2008 which pertains to complaint lodged by the respondent no.1 who is daughter in law of the present petitioners. 3 I have perused the said complaint. In the said complaint, respondent no.1 has clearly stated that all the accused told her that they would not return her `stridhan' and she should do whatever she likes. 2 cr-wp-1560-09 The accused abused her and threatened that they would kill her. Looking to the averment in the complaint, offence under Sections 406, 504 and 506 is clearly made out. 4 The learned advocate for the petitioners submitted that there is no material to show that an offence under Section 323 of IPC is made out. He submitted that there is no medical certificate on record to show that the complainant sustained any injuries. As far as offence under Section 323 of IPC is concerned, complainant has also stated that after her marriage, she was insulted, beaten and also mentally tortured by the accused persons. In such case, though there is no medical certificate on record, offence under Section 323 of IPC can be said to be made out. Thus, looking to the averments in the FIR, no case is made out for quashing of case. Hence, petition is rejected. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]