CRR No.1707 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1707 of 2010 Date of Decision : 12.01.2011 Meenu and another …Petitioners Versus Satya Narain @ Swami …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. This petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 27.01.2010 passed by learned District Judge, Family Court, Bhiwani for enhancement of maintenance. As per the impugned order, the petitioner No.1 has been awarded Rs.3,000/- p.m. and the minor child has been awarded Rs.2,000/- p.m. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the monthly salary of the respondent is Rs.16,980/- and thus the maintenance award is too little. CRR No.1707 of 2010 -2- Considering the fact that Rs.16,980/- is the gross salary of the respondent out of which there would be different deductions, it cannot be said that the amount awarded to the petitioners is either patently perverse or erroneous. In the circumstances, the revision petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file application for enhancement of maintenance after a period of two years. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 12, 2011 JUDGE ashish