1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1871 OF 2007. Sau.Dhanashri M. Dere ..vs.. State of Maharashtra. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. DATE : 11th July, 2007. Heard Mr. V.S. Dhore, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Sonare, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant is the sister in law of deceased Surekha. Surekha was married with Gajanan, brother of the present applicant. It is alleged that Surekha's father had refused to stand as surety in the Court for the offence committed by Gajanan. On account of that, the relation became strange. Surekha, therefore, suicide by hanging. Her brother lodged a report with the police. The husband of Surekha and other have already been arrested by the police. The present applicant apprehends of arrest in the same crime. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that only ground upon which, the application for 2 anticipatory bail came to be rejected by the Sessions Judge is that the accused leaves for nearby village she may tamper with the prosecution witnesses. It is contended on behalf of that applicant that the applicant has married with Milind and she resides in totally different village which is more than 30 kilometres away. In any case, the witnesses, who are material in the present case, are relatives of Surekha. Thus, it is difficult to assume that the applicant may tamper with the witnesses. Therefore, there is not enough material against her. In this circumstances, I find that this is a fit case were anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant. Hence, the order. In the event of arrest in Crime No. 59/2007 registered at P.S. Mangrulpir, the applicant be released on bail on her entering into personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5000/- with one surety in the like amount. Hamdast granted. JUDGE andurkar.