THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY REVIEW WPMP.No.40400 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION No.23901 of 2006 ORDER: This Review WPMP is filed by the petitioners in Writ Petition No.23901 of 2006, which was disposed of by order, dated 17.11.2011. Petitioners were the students of B.E. Part time FDH course. When they were not permitted to write the examinations of I Semester of IV year of the said course and to attend the classes of II Semester of IV year, they approached this Court and filed the writ petition, in which, the respondents have filed counter-affidavits stating that the petitioners were having backlogs and within 8 years from the date of joining, they did not complete the course as such they are not eligible to write such examinations. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition was dismissed by order, dated 17.11.2011. In this review petition, it is submitted by Sri K.S.Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners that there were certain developments during pendency of the Writ Petition and he had no knowledge of the same and that the Writ Petition was disposed of without noticing such developments taken place during pendency of the Writ Petition. It is further submitted that even before disposal of the Writ Petition, on the representation filed by the petitioners, they were permitted to write the examinations and in view of dismissal of the Writ Petition, the respondents are not releasing their results. Even the learned Standing Counsel for Osmania University appearing for the respondents also states that the University permitted the petitioners to write such examinations as one time measure. If the University on its own permitted the petitioners to write examinations, the order passed by this Court in the writ petition should not come in the way of the respondents either to announce the results of the petitioners or to allow them to complete the course. As it is not in dispute that permission is granted to the petitioners to write examinations, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this review WPMP, clarifying that if the petitioners are allowed to write examinations, respondents may announce the results of such examinations, uninfluenced by the findings recorded in the order dated 17.11.2011. It is also clarified that if there are further backlogs of the petitioners, the order passed in the writ petition will not preclude the respondents to consider the request of the petitioners either to continue the course or to allow them to write examinations for completion of the course. Subject to the above clarifications, this Rev.WPMP is disposed of. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 13th DECEMBER, 2011. Note: issue c.c. today. kvni