CRM-M-20086-2011 [ 1 ] ::::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20086-2011 Date of decision:26.07.2011. Jai Narain ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case registered vide FIR No.127 dated 01.03.2011, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC at Police Station Civil Lines, Gurgaon. The allegation in brief against the petitioner is that he had prepared two fake receipts of `50,00,000/- each dated 01.08.2007 and 25.02.2008 respectively by forging signatures of the complainant and filed two complaints bearing No.753-2 dated 02.11.2008 and 775-2 dated 04.11.2008 against the complainant and used the said receipts. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that a civil dispute has been given the colour of criminal case and has pleaded innocence of the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner in detail and perused the record as well but I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner because the inquiry in the complaints filed against the complainant was conducted by ACP, Gurgaon and the complainant's signatures were compared with the signatures on the receipts in possession of the accused/petitioner from the Forensic Science Laboratory, Madhuban in which CRM-M-20086-2011 [ 2 ] ::::::::: Shri Gulshan Rai, Deputy Director, Forensic Science Laboratory, Haryana, Madhuban has reported on 28.04.2009 that the signatures of the complainant shown on the receipts dated 01.08.2007 and 25.02.2008 do not tally with his admitted signatures. In presence of this prima facie evidence and the receipts coming from the possession of the petitioner, custodial interrogation of the petitioner becomes necessary. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present petition and as such the same is hereby dismissed. July 26, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE