IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2010 / 11TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 19884 of 2008(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SRI.VARKEY VARKEY, KURISHINKAL HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., CHERTHALLAI. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. PALLIPPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PALLIPPURAM POST, CHERTHALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, ALAPPUZHA. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERTHALA. 5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, POOCHACKAL DIVISION. 6. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, CHERTHALA DIVISION. 7. MANU IMMAUNEL KADAVAN, KADAVAN HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., CHERTHALA. 8. BABU PARAMESWARAN, KARIATTE HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., CHERTHALLAI. R1 BY ADVS.SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) R2 BY SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS,SC,POLL.C.BOARD R5 & R6 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.19884/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 28.2.1990 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.11001/2006 AND CONT. CASE(C) NO.1046/2007 DTD. 2.08.07. P3:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 8.5.08. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.19884/2008-P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by non implementation of the directions issued in Ext.P2 Judgment, by the Panchayat. He is a Fisherman and is licensee of a Chinese-net. In Ext.P2 Judgment, this Court directed the Panchayat to take appropriate action as is available under the Panchayat Laws to ensure that there is no activity of ginning coconut fibre by soaking in the lake. 2. The allegation is against the seventh and eighth respondents for causing pollution. 3. The learned counsel for the Panchayat submitted that pursuant to the direction issued in Ext.P2 Judgment, stop memos have been issued to both the respondents, namely, seventh and eighth respondents on 15/10/2007. It is submitted that the units are not functioning. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of recording the above submission. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms