IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12018 of 2011 1. Ram Pravesh Paswan SON OF SRI PASWAN RESIDENT OF AMARPURA, P.S. PALI DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 2. RABINDRA NATH PANDEY SON OF SHRI BECHAN PANDEY RESIDENT OF KASURPA, P.S. RAJPUR, DISTRICT BUXAR. 3. RAMAKANT RAI SON OF LATE KESHARI RAI RESIDENT OF KHORIATHA, P.S. MANOHARPUR, DISTRICT BUXAR. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 22/09/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The interpretation sought to be given by the petitioners of annexure-8 is not acceptable by the Court because it only says that a departmental enquiry would be required to be held before removal of the petitioners on the ground of illegal appointment which the petitioners are treating to be a direction for removal. Interpretation is far fetched. It will be all dependent upon the outcome of the enquiry and the evidence which may come during the course of the same. Only when a conclusion is reached based on the outcome, there can be an occasion for the petitioner to approach the Court. The Court will not come in the way of holding a - 2 - departmental enquiry; more so when it is an origin of the earlier prayer of the petitioner. This writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)