1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.O. No. 465 OF 2009 Mpl. Council,Bhandara & anr. v. Smt. Lalita wd/o Ankush Tandekar & ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A.Z. Jibhkate Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D.Duvvuri Advocate for the Respdt. no.1. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 10 th AUGUST, 2009. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners/applicants states that the file of writ petition which was dismissed for non removal of office objections inadvertantly remained unnoticed and that is why the petition stood dismissed in the office. Mr.Duvvuri, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has serious objection for condoning the delay as well as for restoration of writ petition. Having heard learned counsel for rival parties, I find that the petition 2 was dismissed in the office for non removal office objections and it never saw the board of the Court. It will be unfair to bury the petition without the same being not before the Court for effective adjudication. In the result, I find that the delay in filing the present application is satisfactorily explained. Hence delay is condoned. C.A. allowed in terms of its prayer clause. M.C.A. St. No. 4601/09 Heard. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 opposed the application for restoration. For the reasons stated in the application, this petition is restored to file. Office objections to be removed on or before 7.9.2009. This shall be the last chance. JUDGE /TA/ 3