c A /' (o IN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PBTITION (S) NO?3^ /2011 PETITIONER A^^- ^^ .^^ ^^y ^'^.•••' ->•N^ ^^ RESPONDENTS Dr. MANOHARLAL THAWAIT, S/o. Shri Dwarika Prasad Thawait, aged about 67 years, Occupation- Retired Medical officer R/o. Kaser Para, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Building Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Health Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Medical 85 Health Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WmT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^6" ^^y H1GH COURT OF CHHATTESGARK AT BILASPUR SB : HOK'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITWKER DIWAKER W.P.fSLNO. 7374/2011 Dr. Manohar Lal TKa^vait PSTITIONER RESPONDENTs versus State of Chhattisgarh 8s Others Shri Abhishek Saraf, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (07.12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though the period from 23.7.00 to 23.1.01 has been treated as earned leave of the petitioiier but the salaiy for the said peri©^has not been granted to him. s Counsel for the petitioner subriSIts that the representation of the petitioner has already been considered and order has been passed but yet the effect of the order has not been given in favour of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition however a direction may be issued to respondent N0.2 to look into the matter and to pass appropriate order. State counsel has 110 objection if the respondent N0.2 passes appropriate order in the case of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the respondent N0.2. Needless to state that in the eventuality of filing any such representation/application by the petitioner the same would be decided in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Thus the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the Uberty as aforesaid. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the repx'esentation/application strictly in accordance with law. Sdl^^et ^et ^v^ ?^tt^^