IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI$ARH AT BILASPUR WMT FEE TION NO. (6 “D OF 2001 Vy ‘ PETITIONERS VA. M/s Jayaxwals Neco Ltd” through Shri c.M. wSamyal aonoof H L samyal aged abOut 1.1+ 1/? years, resident of Light Industrial Awa, ‘ Bhila; - #900026 Instr-let Durg, Power of 1 Attorny Holder for and» on behalf of V/Petitioner Canpany ,/2. M/s Jayaswal Steel Enterprises, Pvt. Ltd. 31, Light Industrial Area, Bhilai through Shra. ‘e.M Sanyal son o£ H.L sanyal,aged abOut #4 year§ Bhllai - 4900026 District Durg, Power/Attorny Holder for and on behalf of Pgtitioner Company 5’. Jayaswal Steel Processing Pvt. Ltd. 178-B Light Industrial Area Bhilai - #900026 District Durg through Shri xe/d';M.3anya1 son of H.L.Sanya1, Power of Attorny Holder for and on behalf of Petitioner Cqnpany Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhatisgarh, thrOugh Secretary Local Self Governnent, D.‘K. Mantralaya Raipur - Chhatisgarh 2. Municipal Corporation Bhilai Distrct Durg through‘its CmmissiOner EETITION UNDER ARTCECLE 226(222 OF THE CONSTITUTION. OF INDIA I i "or? warm Wrwé Shn R.R.Sinha, Advocate fort e petitioner, -~‘ I Shri Kishoré Bhaduri, Additi nai Advocate General and Shri Vikram Dixit, Advocat for the respective respondents. ‘ Heard. On the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, further two weeks time is granted to make good the defauit as pointed out by the office failing which the petition ’shall stand dismieeed for want of orosecution, without reference to the Court. 5d]- Satish K Agnlhotrl Judge u r awW (Eamw) (S B Hon ble Shn Sangh K Agnlhotn, J.) § 22 1 s 2011 1:3 wm “9% . w _ w m mg Hagwig. maazawmg&a waqq% :sssssezzzw%wwaa $Ea¢£&AH&%amv £¢§§ ”3% mw& gz % m? 3g A _ N I , w?! E. ,Egz gigmwag‘ «.32Rim§mmx 3L.» xwe“T v g £0 MwEVE §£§ Aw? Dr?.¢ £§ g %&”£ma32@%gdw