-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.107 OF 1994 Gafur Mahammadsab Mande ..Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.S.P.Thorat for Advocate for Appellant Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 3, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 3, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 3, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned A.P.P. seeks time till 25.11.2005 to file affidavit regarding steps taken to trace the appellant-accused. Mr.Thorat, the learned advocate for the appellant states that he has sent communication by R.P.A.D. to the appellant about the order dated 10.6.2002, however, the said communication has returned back stating that the accused is not residing at the said place. The postal remark of the said communication states that "not found at the address". The said communication is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]