IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. : M-5082 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 15, 2011 Suresh Pal and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. * * * * RANJIT SINGH, J. (oral) None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite the case having been called on more than two occasions. The petitioners have impugned the orders Annexure P-2 and P-3, vide which they have been summoned under sections 420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC. The Court found that there is some dispute between the petitioners and respondent No.2 where allegation is that on cheque was returned with the endorsement “Account Closed”. Counsel for respondent No.2 points out that as per account no.2136, petitioner No.1 had forged the cheque no.822616 on 20.08.2004, amounting to Rs.9,50,000/-. The court found that prima facie case was made out against the petitioners, who had fabricated the cheque. On the basis of dishonour of cheque, complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was filed against the respondent for which he has faced trial and has been acquitted. It is on these basis the complaint has been filed for fabricating the cheque. The petitioners filed revision before the Addl. Sessions Judge, Patiala, which was dismissed. I see no ground to interfere in the order specially so when their revision has been dismissed. Dismissed. (RANJIT SINGH) November 15, 2011 JUDGE sarita