$ENGLE 3ENEH BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR lC.G.l WRIT PE'I‘ITION (s) No. A6$f 12006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICL% 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT l WRITS‘ ORDER l ORDERS, DIRECTION l DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE 0F, MANQAMUSH /_ cERnORARI, PROHIBITION PETITIONER '/ Smt. Dipika Thakur, aged about 54 years, widow of Late T.R. Thakur, working as Lady Health Visitor, Community Health Centre, Charama, Distt. North Bastar, Kanker, resident of village Lilajhar, Tah. Charama, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) r VERSUS RESPONDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgarh, through — the Secretaxy, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The District Collector, North Bastar, Kanker (Cm / (’3. /4. The Chief Medical & Health omcer, District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) The Block Medical and Health OEcer, Block Charama, Distt‘. North Bastar (Chhattisgarh) XI—HC—78 $ 7 H W , W , W WW ' . w.€. i1 Rgglp. Qaq; 200 Wm (W) WWW wmm WW§$¢W mmm ‘ %W311%3T 10.8.2006 Shri A.V, Sridhar, Advocate f0' the petitionerl Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt, Advocate for the State on advance copy. Heard r has challenged her transfer order dated 67.2006 (Annexure P—1) whereby sh has been transferred from Community Health Centre, Charama to Community He ith Centre, Durgukondat on the administrative ground By this petiticn, the petition is that the petitioner is suffering from heart disease taking regular treatmentat harama and the doctor has advised her to stay nearby area of the District Hospital. Whereas, vide impugned order the petitioner has been transferred at a distance of 175 Kms from the present place of posting and at that place proper medical facility i not available, therefore, the transfer order is prejudicial to her heaith. in the circumstances, learne counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a etailed representation to respondent No.2 and in turn he be directed to decide th same in accordance with law, to which Shri Baiaj learned Dy Govt Adv forthe tate has no obiection Havmg heard learned couns for the parties and havrng regard to the facts and Circumstances of the case, With ut expressmg any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to ma a detailed representation to respondent No.2 raising all her grievances within 10 ys from today along with copy of this petition and in turn, respondent No2 to deci e the representation of the petitioner within a .period of 30 days from the date of r celpt of representation in accordance with law after considering all the grievances r ised by the petitioner. Consequentiy, M.(vv,)P. No.3 75/06 also stands disposed or. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge The main ground of chaileng With the direction aforesaid, t e petition stands disposed of. P.T.O. J % / \\ W v i