1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.71 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr.P. G. Rodge, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V. D. Hon, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Mr. G. D. Kale, Advocate for respondent nos.4 and 5. Mr. V. D. Rakh, AGP for the State. ........ [CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 21st January, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard. The employee teacher Sanjay feels that the direction dated 19.08.2008 in Writ petition No.7265/2007, as indicated in para no.2 are disobeyed by the Authorities. In the paragraph no.2 of the judgment, the directions are issued to make payment by the Education Officer or by the Management, the respondents in the writ petition. The record prima facie reveal against the present petitioner as there is 2 letter at Exhibit `R-I' dated 24.04.2009 of the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Latur, wherein he has pursuant to the direction of this Court in Writ Petition No.7265/2007, heard the teacher and the Management and observed that the Management has a responsibility to remit the salary to the petitioner. The Education Officer has also observed that the salary for the period from June, 2002 to February, 2006 is paid to the petitioner herein. 2. Mr. P. G. Rodge still challenge that no such salary is paid. The Counsel for the management submits, necessary record was perused by the Education Officer. The controversy raised by both the sides are beyond the scope of contempt. The order of Education Officer prima facie is in compliance of direction in Writ Petition No. 7265/2007 dated 19th August, 2008. No merit, contempt petition dismissed. No costs. [ K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE gas/cp71.09