IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-9417 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 19, 2010 Sukhpreet Singh @ Sukha @ Ghanti & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Kunal Siag, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, assisted by Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate, for the complainant. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.3 dated 2.1.2009 under Sections 323, 324, 307, 148, 149 IPC registered with Police Station, Phillaur, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the FIR vis-a-vis the petitioner is vague. The petitioners have been in custody for more than one year. Crl. Misc. No. M-9417 of 2010 [2] I have considered the contentions of learned counsel. As per allegations in the FIR, 4 youngsters came on motor cycle which included the petitioners. Accused were armed with Kirpan and Datar, and attacked Ravinder Singh. It transpires that Ravinder received injuries including two injuries on the head. Ravinder Singh, a young man of 23 years, has been rendered not only deaf but also permanent physically de-capacitated in so much as the doctors have declared 75% disability. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petition is dismissed. The Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial and conclude it preferably within 4 months of next date of hearing. (AJAI LAMBA) April 19, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?