IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.23192 of 2010 Date of Decision:- 23.12.2010 Smt.Rajni Devi ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.R.K.Handa, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner has argued that a show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner to which she has filed reply, however, she apprehends that an adverse order is likely to be passed against her and that the show cause notice itself is mala fide and contrary to the records. This Court is of the view that the present writ petition is premature as there is no order passed against the petitioner which would adversely affect her interest as of now. Only a show cause notice has been issued to which a reply has been filed by the petitioner. The apprehension of the petitioner at this stage is totally misplaced. The writ petition is dismissed as premature with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action in case any adverse order is passed against her interest is passed. December 23, 2010 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE