^F^ lliai ihri Sadhu Ram R/o Ward No. 16, Jhs Kadam Road, P.0. and Tehsil Sakti, Di injgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS ITS : 1. State Govt. .of Chhattisgarh Through: The iecretary, School Education & Tribie Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt.' Raipur(C.G.) iint Pens'on) Bilaspur, Distt. BJJaspur(C.6.) !fc! iOFl!^ K.n Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. L 'a; ith the consent ' this petition, srtiss, the matter Is heard fini ing for recoveiy Rs. 65,415/- from the retiral dues of the petitioner, fixation of saiary. ionger n matter o1 Sahib Ram v. State of Haryana and others1, and further Hi v. e of Chhattis&arh & Others2 and Vidva Shankar Tiv/ari v. State of M.P. fhl In ths impugned order has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 11995 Supp <i) SCC 20 2 2006 (1) MPHT 105 (CQ) 3 2006 (2) MPHT 31 (CG) w X:: '^±^> 4. Shri Sao, iearned Government isgation that no opportunity of Chhattisgarh Civl! Services (Pension) ') r, he relies on Rute 65 of the Ruies, 1976 (for short 'the 5. The under Rule 65 of the Ruies, 1976, basic principl^ of natura! justice In the t case, the State/authorities have not afforded any opportunity of t, in tl sve bees iting the same as hls saiary. At this stage, the aiieged Foregoing, this petitton isaiiowed in the terms of the in the case of Vjdyadhar Tiwan (supra) i.e. the recoveiy of Rs. 65,415/- from the retiral dues of the petitionsr is hereby quashed. The petitioner is entitied to Tuit penstonary benefits/gratuity amount without any deductlon. However, it is open to t'ns respondents to take recourse to Ruie 65 of the Ruies, 1376, llowing baslc Amst Sd/- .' , SatishK.Agmhom Judge