IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 14056 of 1999 Between: 1 Marati Thirupathi s/o. Rajamallu, r/o. Mandamarry Village and Mandal, Adilabad District. 2 Pulluri Sadanandam s/o. Nagaiah, Tallapally village, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Executive Director, District Backward Classes- Services, Co- operative Society Ltd., Adilabad, AdilabadDistrict. 2 The District Collector, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 3 The Employment Officer, Adilabad, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate writ order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, (i) directing the respondnets herein to call and permit the petitioners herein in the recruitment process for the post of Loan Inspector, to be held on or before 12-7-99 or any other susquent date, (ii) Declare the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioners for the recruitment process, conducting for the post of loan inspector to be held on 12-7-99 or any other subsequent date, is arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art, 14,16 and 21 of the constitution of India, anddictum passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in AIr-1996 (6) Scale-676, and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.CHANDRASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: On 11.4.2008, when the writ petition has come up for consideration, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed next week under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today when the matter is called, none appeared for petitioner nor there is any representation. Even otherwise, the cause in the writ petition does not survive as of now for adjudication. Therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 21.4.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No. 14056 of 1999 21.4.2008