IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 25696 of 2009(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- KEERTHI.A, KEERTHI (H), PERUVAYAL P.O., KAYALAM-673024. BY ADVS. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR SMT.V.A.LAZIDA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, MALAPPURAM CENTRE, MALAPPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC, KPSC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 25696 of 2009(F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS - NIL RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(a) : COPY OF PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO THE PSC //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.25696 Of 2009 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered against the petitioner in the light of the judgment in Writ Appeal No.348/2010. 2. The application filed by the petitioner was rejected for failure to enter the correct category code number in the computer data sheet of the application. The application was to the post of LPSA in Malappuram District. 3. In Writ Appeal No.348/2010 and in Writ Appeal No.1236/2010 the very same issue was considered. This Court took the view that if the application does not mention the correct category number, it is a defective application and if the Commission decides to reject the same, it cannot be said to be ultra vires or unauthorised. Therefore the Writ Petition do not deserve any merit and the same is dismissed. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge