BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. G9W772006 Bajrang Agrawal, S/o. Shri PETITIONER Maturam Agrawal, Aged about 52 years, Partner M/s. Gopiram Maturam, A Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act, Sarangarh Road, Raigarh, R/o. Gandhi Ganj, Raigarh, Tahsil 8a District Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDNENTS /1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce 8r, Industries, New Delhi. The Collector, District Raigarh (C.G.). The Sub Divisional Officer, District Raigarh {C.G.). Area Officer, Food Inspectcr, Food Department, Raigarh (C.G.). Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.). / w WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226Z2% OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS , PROHIBITION AND [OR ANY OTHER'WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. , . XI-HC—78 WWWW . *:4r:..ce>..9.a./.... mm WW(W) WWEwm mwm a:mm 2/112007 Shri Kishore Bhaduri, couns e! for the petitioner. and 3V Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, Government Advocate for respondents No.2 Heard. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondent No.2 for passing order on therappiication of the petitioner for permitting him to shift tank of the kerosene ch is existing near Saranggarh Railway Crossing at Raigarh. The petitioner's case is th t he is a kerosene dealer since iast 25 years having a dealership license fstocking and distribution of kerosene oil. He has erected a tank for storage of kerosene oil near Saranggarh Railway Crossing at Raigarh.‘ As the aut orities want to conStruct over bridge over the Railway Crossing, in that, t e' petitioner’s kerosene tank is creating obstruction, as that land belongst the Railway Authorities, they have asked him to shift the kerosene tank. The petitioner obtained NOC from all concerned authorities for shifting fthe tank and thereafter being a licensing authority, the petitioner moved a plication before the Collector, Raigarh in the month of October, 2006 for permitting him to shift the tank, but the Collector is not passing any order n the said application of the petitioner. ‘ Learned counsel for the pe tioner submitted that Railways Authorities and Oil Company are pressing .har and threatening the petitioner to shift the oil tank, faiiing which Oil Compa y would cancel the dealership. Learned counsel further submitted that in he circumstances, the Collector may be directed to pass appropriate 0rd r on the application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, to which lear ed counsel for respondents No.2 & 3 has no objection. P.T.O. . w i @»@ mwxmm,W XI—HC—78 o o.ooooo.o~oooo.c‘ooi. Wm’amaw) mm E fg‘irW mmmm rgé ég 311%:m Having heard learned coungei for thé parties and havmg regard to the facts and circumstances of the casre, respondent No.2, Couector, is directed to pass orders on the applidation of the petitioner within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of his order, in accordance with iaw. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitied for certified copy'of this order. Sd/— I r Acting Chief Justice Barve PIO. 7