IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3682 of 2011 SHIV LAKHAN UPADHAYAY & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the father-in- law and other family members of the informant are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498(A), 323, 504/34 of the I.P.C. The accusation is that after the marriage was performed in 2004, the husband of the informant died and the family members including the father-in-law are not allowing the informant to enjoy the share of the property of the informant’s husband. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant is residing in the same house and they have no objection in allowing the informant to enjoy the share of her husband. The aforesaid offer of the learned counsel for the petitioners has been accepted by the learned counsel for the informant. Considering the nature of accusation, let the petitioners, Shiv Lakhan 2 Upadhayay, Shiv Shankar Upadhayay, Chandan Upadhayay and Pankaj Upadhayay be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No.98 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bail bond of the petitioners will be provisionally accepted. Let the learned court below direct the local police station to submit a report through the S. P., Buxar that the informant has been restored to her share of the property in question within a period of two months and if the informant is peacefully restored to her share of the property in question then the bail bond of the petitioners will be confirmed. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)