IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1797 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 20th July, 2009. Hem Chander Bansal & Anr. Petitioners through Mr. Jasbir Singh Dadwal, Advocate Versus CONFED, Haryana Respondents through Mr. Harish Bansal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioners seek a direction for disposal of their eviction petition by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh in a time-bound manner. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard. The record reveals that the eviction petition has been filed by the petitioners in the year 2007. Suffice it to say that no direction to decide a particular case in a time-bound manner can be issued, especially when there might by several other cases instituted earlier in point of time and are awaiting disposal. The docket management and speedy disposal of cases exclusively falls within the domain of the court concerned. The Court needs to have a priority list to decide the cases which should invariably be based upon the date of institution, though there are always a few cases warranting out-of- turn disposal. In the absence of any material on record, it is difficult to opine that other cases under the Rent Act pending before the Rent Controller do not suffer with the same kind of hardship as is being faced by the petitioner. The Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of with the observation that the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, subject to priority to be given to other such cases, shall expedite the hearing of the case in hand also. Disposed of. July 20, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE