APPLICANT. HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSQARH AT BILASPWR C3LM.P. No. 288/2008 Ruman Siiigh Chakradhari, aged about 58 years, S/o Late Shri Tiharu Ram Chakradhari, District martoetmg Ofi&cer, Mahasamzmd, R/o Janta Colony, Q,No, -5, Gudiyari, Raipur, District Raqpur. (C.G.). MOll-APPUCANT. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Mahasaxxiund, District Maliasaixiuxid (C.G.). 2. G.P. Vaishnav, S/o Late Shri Narayaii Prasad Vaishnav, aged about 53 yeara, Qodown In-charge, District Vipaaii OfGicer Mahasamuiid, R/o Belmid F.C.I., Raigarh, District Ra^arh (C.G.). 3, J,M. Baghar, aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Anta Bagfaar, Assistent Accouiit Officer, District Viiman Officer Mahasamuiid (C.G-), 4, Dfaaiyi, S/Q ^hri Bfaeemji Bfaaiiusalay, aged about 50 years, R/o Saatrabadi, Dui^, P.S. Mohaa Nagar, District-Durg (C.G.). APPLICATIOII UNDBR 8BCTION 4^t 0V CODB OP CIUMaiAI* PROCBDURB. (8B :Hon*1>le Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present: Shri D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the appllcant Shri Vinod Tekam, P.L. forthe State/Non-appljcart No. 1. None for the non-appiicante No. 2 to 4. ORAL-ORDER (I»as»ed<m10/07/2008) 1. This petition is directed agairret the order dated 23/4/2008 in criminat cae No. 264^007 passed by the Judicial Ms^istrate First Class, Mahsreamundm whereby learned Judicial Magistrate First Class has framed the oharge for the offwce purrishstole under Sections 409^34,467/34,468/34, & 471 of I.P.C. 2. Shri D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the appHcant smd Shri Vinod Tekam, P.L. for the State are heard. /- — ^. 3. This is a petition fbr quashment of the charge under Sastion ^»2of the Cr.P.C., 1973. The scope of imterference in exercise of inherent pov^rs is very limtted and law is settled in thte regard that inherent jurisdiction may be exeroised only in exceptional circumstances such as (i) to give effect to an order under the Court (ii) to prevent abu^ ofthe proc^ ofthe Ctourt and (iii) to otherwise secure tfieerclsofjusttee. 4. The order impugned and copy of charge sheet are perused. It rev^ite that thts is not a case in which if^the materiat coltected by the prosecution is actmitt^l by the ap^icant in its faoe value then even convtotion would not be posslble. Consequentty, no interference is calted for at this sts^e. 5. The petition being devoid of merits it is liable to be dlsmtesed and hereby di^nissed at the stage 6f admission. Case is related to criminat breach of prosecutton of the pubiic property. Trial Court is directed to decfcle the matter expeditiously. ^-^h' Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge