IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2844 of 2010 PINTU MAHTO @ RANJIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 326, 307 and 302 of the Penal Code is that he is not one of the several named accused when the assailants are also named, he at best may be a member of the mob only. Counsel for the State submits that witnesses have named the involvement of the petitioner but from the case diary is unable to point out that he was one of the assailants. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Vth, Nawada in connection with S.Tr. No. 6 of 2009/334 of 2009 arising out of Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 85/2000. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)