// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4920/2007 Richhpal Yadav S/o Shri Chauthmal Yadav Versus Smt. Sabari Devi W/o Shri Kalyan Sahay Date of Order ::: 23.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Mohd. Anees, Counsel for petitioner Shri Kailash Sharma, Counsel for respondent #### By the Court:- Admit. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition on behalf of the defendant is directed against the impugned order dated 29th May, 2007 passed by the trial Court rejecting his application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead Raghuveer Prasad, Jagdish Prasad and Gajanand as Party defendants No.4 to 6 in the suit. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the reasons assigned by the trial court for rejecting the application. The trial court has discussed the controversy involved in the suit and thereafter has recorded a finding that they are not necessary party to be impleaded // 2 // as defendants No.4 to 6. The reasons assigned by the trial court appear to be perfectly justified. No interference is called for in the said order. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//