IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:23507 of 2001 Between: 1 P.V.Bharathi W/o.Late V.V.Nanchariah R/o.Sai Residency, Bhagya Nagar Colony, Kukatpally, HYderabad. 2 Smt.S.Sujatha W/o.Venkateswar Rao R/o.H.No.C-377, Huda Colony, Chandanagar, HYderabad. 3 B.Padmalatha W/o.Naresh Chander R/o.H.No.19-110/1, Goutham Nagar, Malkajgiri, HYderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Dy.Registrar of the Co-op.Societies Sangareddy, Medak Dist. 2 The Sub-Registrar of the Co-op.Societies O/o.Divisional Cooperative Officer, Sangareddy. 3 M.V.S.Narsimha Rao S/o.N.L.Narasimham R/o.16-17, Allwyn Colony, Patancheru. 4 V.Prasad Reddy S/o.Chinnappa, R/o.16-11, Allwyn Employees Cooperative Building Society, Patancheru. 5 B.Chillibabu S/o.Peda Pitchaiah, R/o.16-78, Allwyn Colony, .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MRS. P.VIJAYALAKSHMI FOR SMT.N.SHOBA The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying aﬃdavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders in Proceedings in R.C.No.1725/2001-H, dt.20.10.2001 issued by the respondents and set aside the same as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.” At the hearing, Smt. P.Vijayalakshmi, learned counsel representing Smt. N.Shoba, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 15.11.2001 is vacated, WPMP.No.26297 of 2001 is dismissed and WVMP.No.3434 of 2001 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th NOVEMBER, 2008. kvni