IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37239 of 2008 RAJESH RAI … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: None For the State: Shri DAshrath Mehta,APP ----------- 3. 9.1.2009 None appears for the petitioner. I have heard Shri Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The allegation is that the petitioner committed rape upon the victim who was aged, as per the statement in the F.I.R., 10 years who was found aged 14 years. The injury found on the private part of the victim confirms the allegation. The chemical analysis of her undergarments also indicates that she was raped. None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the early hours and the matter was set apart for hearing during the later part of it. The Court Master informs that the mater was also listed yesterday but no one had appeared and, as such, the mater was adjourned to today. As per the grounds taken in the petition, the prayer for bail is on account 2 of the compromise as also on account of resiled statement of the victim that she was raped. Regard being had to the allegation which gets support also from the medical report, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)