w HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Appeal No.343 of 201 O APPELLANT Petitioner Subhash Nag, S/o Shri Levin Nag, aged about 22 years, R/o 61-A, Ruabandha Sector, Bhilai, District Durg (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. 2. 3. Government Polytechnic College, Durg, through Principal, Government Polytechnic College, Durg (CG) Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, through Registrar, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, through Registrar Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Sector-8, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (CG) Present: Shri Ashish Nag, counsel for the appellant. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. 1 ' Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ. JUDGMENT (29-10-2010) The following judgment ofthe Court was delivered by Dhirendra Mishra, J. The appellant filed a writ petition and prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to provide him answer sheet of the concerned subject with the marks allotted in the second attempt and also prayed that the action of the respondent authorities in not supplying the answersheet of the concerned subject to the petitioner may be held to be illegal and arbitrary. 2, The writ petition has been dismissed by the impugned order with an observation that the petitioner had already taken recourse to the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and the Chhattisgarh Information Commission vide its order dated 19-11-2009 has dismissed the appeal and ,.^» Barve t^ the petitioner has deliberately kept back the order dated 19-11-2009 to mislead the Court. Further considering clause-15 of the Ordinance No.5 of the University which provides that examination answer-books and documents regarding the marks obtained by the examinees, except the tabulated results, shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of after 6 months from the date of the declaration ofthe results, the petition has been dismissed. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and after due perusal of the record of the writ petition as also the impugned order, we find no substance in this writ appeal, the same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishar Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge