IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1836 of 2007 Date of Decision: 14.9.2009 Gurdit Ram ....Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Sharma, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for respondent No.3. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for respondent No.3 has placed on record a certified copy of the order dated 20.5.2009 passed by the trial court whereby the suit of the plaintiff-petitioner out of which the instant revision has arisen, had been dismissed as withdrawn. Since no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing, the case was adjourned for today. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that although he has received no instructions from the petitioner in that regard but in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.3 and also the certified copy of the order dated 20.5.2009 passed by the trial court, the present revision petition may be dismissed as infructuous, however, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to move an application C.R. No. 1836 of 2007 -2- for revival of the revision in case the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.3 is found to be incorrect. In view of the above, the instant revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to move an application for revival of the case in case the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No.3 is found to be incorrect. September 14, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE