IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17241 of 2009 1. PUTUL DEVI W/O LATE SUNIL KUMAR PASWAN R/OVILL TURHA TOLI, P.O. & P.S.DANAPUR CANTT, DISTT-PATNA Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, NEW DELHI 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, BOMBAY 3. ADDITIONAL POLICE, DIRECTOR, GROUP, CRRF TELEGRAM PUNE (MAHARASTRA) 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, GROUP CENTRE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE TELEGRAM, PUNE 5. ADDITIONAL POLICE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL C.R.P.F. MOKAMA GHAT, (BIHAR) ----------- For the Petitioner : M/S Banwari Sharma and Shiv Kumar, Advocates. For the Union of India : Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Senior Advocate (ASG) & Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey (CGC) ==== 5. 28.01.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. 2. Having considered the averments made in the counter affidavit, I am satisfied that the application of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment was time barred. In the circumstances, the authorities rightly rejected her request for appointment on compassionate ground in the light of the provisions contained in the Standing Order No.5/2001 as contained in Annexure-A to the counter affidavit. Perusal of Standing Order No.5/2001, however, indicates that the dependents of the ex personnel of the Central Reserve Police Force are to be assisted in becoming fit and capable for qualifying various tests during general recruitment. 3. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ application directing the concerned authority of the Central Reserve Police Force to consider the case of the petitioner or her son for appointment in any general recruitment after giving them opportunity to become fit and capable of qualifying various tests during the general recruitment on their own. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)