19b. cr appa 598-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 598 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 344 OF 2010 Shobha Kamble .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. V.B. Shingnapurkar for the Applicant Mr. J.P. Kharge, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant - original accused no. 2 has been convicted under Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 109 of IPC. The appeal preferred by him against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicant is seeking bail 3. Learned advocate for the applicant stated that besides this case, the applicant has a clean record. He further stated that the applicant was on bail during the trial and she has not misused the liberty granted to her. Both 1 19b. cr appa 598-10.doc these statements have not been controverted by learned APP. Moreover, it is seen that the sentence is only for three months and the appeal is not likely to come up for hearing within said time. Thus, looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant Shobha S. Kamble be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 19b. cr appa 598-10.doc 3