Ai ^°^.f^,9 "•"i"?' ,^°!>T° ^a3 I) i ^i "9"aSaS ff* .»** .ft?niiS.ffi^'?*^ii ^iE&?s'S?;?^ MSGH COURT Di" CMMAI 1 iSOAKM At BILASPUK Writ Petition (C) No. 125 of 201 5°S?°°?°?°?"; Rajesh Kumar Verma, S/o Chhota Prasad, aged about 24 years, Sarpunch Bimlapur, '-;--. ichavat R^mchandr^our. Ts.hsil 'i '^fi L ; j ^/ i ^ lan l 3 -^c i Tsfl, f^-' '^f S ^ I rl^L ^ 3 -^»/^ Pal,Dist.SurgL;ja(C.G.) i? ^.d^ t -a^p ^ < R[CSPOMDi=NTS \» fc '4»i- <;. Stste of Chhsttisgarh Through: The Secretary Panchayat and Gramin Vikash Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Surguja Ambikapur (C.G.) janpad Panchayat Ramchandrapur, 'ahsil- Pai. Distt. Surguja (C.G.), Throuoh ths Chief xecutive Offlcer /<~^ "^ -^f 't^ ^M\ 1 '-^'!' 4un^-^t '<1/n t^^lr^ ^ t^ ^hj! Sil'^l ^.1 I js-npisc! t~''^riCHQy^'ii KsriicnsnGrspui /^-» ./-< \ s.'^/,':^i..( (Writ Pstition undBr Artlcls 22S of ths Ccnstltution of Indi^) Mr. Sunii TriDsthi- AdyQC3tQ forths Dstitionsr, hakur, Pane! Lswi/ar for the State/respondents 1 & 2. ur-u (1 "! Ti ? .^ S '?> ! R: EU A KUSViAR StNHA, J. Heard finaliy w'th the consent of the parties. Petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Verma, has filed this petition for the following "©9i(S^- Q That, the Hon'bie Court may kindiy be pleased to cali the entire records relating to the case of the petitloner. (il) That, this Hon'ble Court may kind'y be pieased to issue a writ in nature of certiorari and quash the impugned order dated 13.08.2009 (Annexure P/1) passed by tearned Collector Surguja in Panchayat Revenue case No. 40/2008-09 in Panchayat Appeal and restore the order dated 23.07.2009 vvhich was passed in the same appeai by the ColleGtor Surguja. (iil) . Any othe' relief's, which is deems fit by this Hon'ble Court may klnd'v be granted and also cost or peuSion." The petitioner, thus ;" substance, Is praying for quashment of the order sted 13.8.2009 (Annexure-P/1), whereby the stay granted eariier has been W.P.(C) No. 125/2010 vacated by theAdditionaI Coilector, Surguja and also for restoration of the stay granted on 23.7.2009 in Panchayat Appeal No. 40/2008-09. !t appears that in Panchayat Appeal No. 40/2008-09, the Additionai Collector passed some interim order in favour of the petitioner on 23.7.2009 and thereafter the matter was fixed for records ete. on 31.7.2009. On 31.7.2009, the matter was adjournedto 28.8.2009but in the meanwhile on 7.8.2009 the respondent appeared and filed an application for vacating the orderof stay. On this application, notices were issued and ultimately the matter was taken up on 13.8.2009. On the said date nobody appeared on behalf of the parties. However, the Additional Collector passed an order on merits and the interim stay granted in favour of the petitioner on 23.7.2009 was vacated. Thereafter the Additional Collector has already fixed the matter for fina! hearing. In the facts and circumstances of the case, ! do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order passed by the Additional Collector on 13.8.2009. The petition has no merits, the same is dismissed at the motion stage itseif. Howeyer, it is observed,as the Additional Collector has already fixed the matter for fina! hearing, he would try to dispose of the same at the earliest. ^_. ••. -«S».r-!-^, fi :';. • ' s<^~ ' ? B?l-."?;l::i • Suml Kumar: Sinhai Judge vatS