HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BHASPUR Writ PeUtion (sl No. 4288of20e& Petitioner Nfljay Kumar Choubey, Agad about 48 yrs, S/o. Chhafradhari Choubey, R/o. Forest Guard, Sub-Range, Latori, Ambikapur, BeatM^ohanpur, South Surguja, Fwest Divlsion, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) Versus Resoondents 1) State of Chhattisgarti, Thiaugh: Secrelary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2) Divtsional Forea CMfteer, Soutti Su^uja, Forest Division, AmfaHsapur, Dlstrict Surguja (CG) 3) ChlefConsen itorofR>reat, ChhatUsgarh, Ralpur, Dlstriet Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUT10N OF ^NDIA — SB: Hon'ble Justlce Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. Manoj Paranpape, Advocate <br ttis peUtloner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the (espondents^tato. Thakur ORDER (Passed on diis 1^h day ofApri^ 2007) 1. The petifioner has fitod ttiis peBfion chaltenging the transferorder dated 7.7.2006. By virtue of the interim oider datett U.8^X)6, passed by thls Court, the peUtioner is continuing at the original placeofposUng. 2. Be that as tt may, with the passage oftime this (wBtion hi» become infructuous, as period of transfer is notapplicabte forever. W ttiis point of time ttiere is no question to examine tte validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberfy to pass appropriate orders, keeping in wew ttis putriie interesl amt administrative e^ency, without insisttng on complfance of the impugned transfer order. 3. In view of ttie alaove, thte peUUon stands diSposed of. No order as tocosts. .' r sd/- • Satish K. Agnihotri Judge