THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 22349 of 2008 Oral order: The petitioner, who claims to be the President of Prakasam Zilla Balaheena Vargala Colony Varala Seva Sangham, has ﬁled this writ petition seeking a direction to the 1st respondent not to send any proposals to the Government of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, for grant of grant-in-aid for running the Old Age Home, Day Care Centre, Typewriting, Craft and Tailoring Centre and also Handloom Weavers Skill Development Centre of the Prakasam Zilla Balaheena Vargala Colony Varala Seva Sangham, Anjaiah Road, Ongole, to any other person except in the name of the petitioner, and consequently direct cancellation of the Registration Certiﬁcate, renewed in favour of other persons. The petitioner states that taking advantage of his absence in the village, one Sri D. Rajashekar Reddy and others, representing themselves as President and Secretary of the Sangham, removed the equipment and machinery from the premises where the Sangham is running the above centers, and thereafter, applied to the 1st respondent to send proposals to the Government of India, for grant of grant-in-aid for running the above centers. According to him, he lodged police report, but no action thereon had been taken by the respondents. He submits that he is, in fact, the President of the Sangham, and as such, the grant- in-aid for running the above centers should be granted in his name, and since the above mentioned persons by misrepresenting have applied to the 1st respondent for grant of grant-in-aid, a direction should be issued to the 1st respondent not to send any proposals for grant of grant-in- aid in the name of the said persons, except himself. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that no relief as prayed for by the petitioner can be granted. As can be seen from the averments made by the petitioner in the aﬃdavit ﬁled in support of the writ petition, there appear to be disputes with regard to the management of the sangham, on the one hand, the petitioner is claiming to be the President, while it is his case that some other persons representing themselves to be the President and Secretary of the society, applied to the 1st respondent for grant of grant-in-aid to run the above centers. The matters, in relation to disputes between the members of the Sangham, cannot be decided in this writ petition. If the petitioner claims that he is the President of the Sangham, and that other persons had misrepresented that they are President and Secretary of the Sangham, his remedy is elsewhere, and certainly, writ petition is not a remedy. Basing on such averments, no direction can be given to the 1st respondent not to send any proposals to the Government of India, for grant of grant-in-aid to any other person, except in the name of the petitioner, and more so when the grant-in-aid to be granted, would only be in the name of the Sangham. Hence, the writ petition is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 15th October, 2008. KSR