S.B.C.P. No.21/2008 Basti Mal Jain v. Sudheer Bhargava & ors Date of Order:09.01.2009 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Narpat Singh, for the petitioner Mr B.L. Bhati, for the respondents As noticed in the order dated 18th November, 2008, revised Pension Payment Order and revised Gratuity Payment Order have already been issued in favour of the petitioner and the petitioner is required to tender the same to Treasury Officer, Pali. It is stated by learned counsel for respondents that revised Gratuity Payment Order has been returned by the petitioner being not willing to draw gratuity. So far as revised Pension Payment Order is concerned, that is required to be presented by the petitioner himself before the Treasury Officer. In view of the fact that revised Pension Payment Order has already been issued and given to the petitioner, I do not consider it appropriate to proceed against respondents under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. [GOVIND MATHUR],J. mma