hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO. 10038 OF 2009 Coop. Bank Employees Union Ratnagiri and anr.. ... Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr.M.S. Topkar for Petitioner. Mr.S.N. Patil, A.G.P. For R. No. 1. Mr. Dhiraj Mhatre i/by Mahernosh Humranwala for R. No. 2. Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar forR. No. 8. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 07, 2009 P.C. It is the case of the Petitioners that Respondent No. 7 has written off some bad debts which could not have been done and accordingly on 21.7.2009 they had written to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. According to respondent No. 7 the learned counsel points out that the bad debts were written off in terms of the directions of Chartered Accountant and kept the right of recovery alive. Considering the controversy, this petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions though the counsel for Respondent No. 2 sought two weeks time to file reply. In the event Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have decided the application that decision may be communicated to the Petitioners. In the event the same has not been decided, the same be decided after having the comments of Respondent No. 5 at any rate not latter than 16 weeks from the copy of this order being served by the Petitioners on Respondent No. 2. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)