IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18135 of 2010 BALKU NAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on suspicion, petitioner has been arrested and from possession of the petitioner few female clothes were recovered which the petitioner claims to be of his family members and the recovered clothes never been put on T. I. Parade nor the petitioner has been put on T. I. Parade. It is further stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. This contention has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. Considering the aforesaid submissions particularly that the petitioner was not put on T.I. Parade and the period under custody, 2 let the petitioner, Balku Nat, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 09 of 2010. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)