(1) ra48-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 48 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 170 OF 2009 Sk. Rashid Sk. Musa Kureshi & others PETITIONERS VERSUS Prakash s/o Hiraman Bhill & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, advocate for the Petitioners. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. Pramod Gaikwad, advocate holding for Mr. A.G. Talhar, advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 20. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 26th AUGUST, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. From the perusal of the order passed by learned Single Judge, dated 9th July, 2007 in Writ Petition No. 3046/1990, it would reveal that the learned Single Judge has directed to allot the deficit land to persons belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and landless persons belonging to Nomadic Tribes, Vimukta Jatis, etc. The order of the learned Single Judge would also reveal that the order passed by the Tahsildar has been maintained. (2) ra48-09 2. In that view of the matter, we find that our observations in the order dated 14th January, 2009, to the effect that "while deciding the claim of the petitioners, the Revenue Authorities shall bear in mind the fact that the decision in W.P. No. 3046/1990 is in respect of only the petitioners therein and would not necessarily govern other people" is not correct. In that view of the matter, there is an error apparent on the face of record while passing the order dated 14th January, 2009 in Writ Petition No. 170 of 2009. The said order is, therefore, recalled. The Writ Petition is restored to its original position. The present Review Petition is accordingly allowed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/ra48-09