1 ^x' IN THE HieH COURT QF:. JUbICATURE^T_BIl-ASPUR CONTEMPT Pl ^-*s> rTQN N0. of 2009 IN THE MATTER OF: W.P. (C) No. 4343/2009 between Petitioner: Smt. Kamarjahan Versus Respondents: APPLICANT (PetitionerL\^^ ...^?^^ ^••^^•^.( I^T Eo^ i< ' 3^-" ys RESPONDENTS/ (Contemnors) The Municipal Corporation, Roipur & others Smt. Kamarjahan, wife of Sheikh Shahnaz, aged about 50 years, resident of Old Bus Stand, Raipur. 1. Shri Amit Katariya, §^_^ Commissioner, Municipal Corpo rat i o n R a i pu r. 2. Shri Sunii Soni, AAayor, . Municipal Corporation, Raipur. 3. Shri K. Bagde, Nagar Nivesak, Municipal Corporation, Raipur. 4. Shri Hemant Sharma, Zone- Commissioner, Zone No.2-, i— ^».^<i '^ "Municipal - Raipur. 5. Shri O.P. Engineer, Municipal Raipur.- Corporation, Vermo. Sub Zone No.7, Corporation, PETITION ARTICLE 215_OF THE_CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12_QF_ THE CQNTEMPT OF COURTS'ACTJ 973. \ Cjy^~ ^^ ^ ^ /^ ^ni •^nqT^pi, •STfrffns. fawi'yy > -^ ^S^I a^?!M, [¥ii*l?3iit?i2 SftHNi ^IiTt 4 ?E9I^I TRIRR ^lfCT qit<ltcf<iil 'RF^tf "^ fsT3t ^.^R^R ^SlPtFT 311^1 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra 14.01.2011 Shri M.L. Saket, counseli Shri Pankaj Agrawal, coij Heard. It is jointly submitted parties that writ petition file^ stahis quo order was pass< disratssed by the learned Sin^l has also been dismissed. MohanShrivastava, J. for the applicant. nsel for the respondents. by learned counsel for tte by the petitioner, in which ?d on 17.8.2009, has been jle Judge and the writ appeal Further, in response t riiade in the petition with regajj'd to disturbing the status quo as ordered by this Court on pertaining to certain utterance| proceedings of the Court, e| affidavit, has stated that thej status-quo nor have uttered authority of the Court and th^ have stated in their affidavit thj > allegation which has been L7.8.2009 and the allegations s in defiance of the orders and a.ch of the respondents, on { have neither disturbed the any such word against fhe majesty of law. Respondents a.t they have highest regard for the orders and proceedings of Ipiis Court and have submitted unqualified apology for any ina^lvertent act. [Tft^ ^R^ Y. :<-'•. T\^ •% tl-HC-22 3lfel'^T 311^1 :IRKSftB f; ]'\- T^ ^i<iici'ii, Ei'dl'yT'i. F°i<'ii'My Q)\ ;T^?T •VC3K HWVII ShHli* "WI. 200 fq^ar" SII^t'TCIIW^ifttI In view of the affidavits the subsequent cu-cumstance proceed furfher in the matter. ,ww—-Accordingly,the rule discharged. Petition is accordingly fu[ially disposed off. ^)Tirf<?rat'l TRP^ff ^ 'fe1^ ^ dT( ^;3if:OT3ii^r submitted by respondents and i, this Court is not inclined to against fhe respondents is Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^^irt •':.,: (• gsg&fca: :^'y 'M S 's^ws