IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2011 / 27TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 10918 of 2011(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. RESHMA T.B, THALIYIL HOUSE, PALARIVATTOM.P.O, KOCHI -25. 2. RESHMA JOSE, THEKKINEDATH HOUSE, C MADHAVAN ROAD, PALLITHAZHAM, N. PARUR. 3. REMYA JACOB, MALAMPARACKAL HOUSE, EMPLOYEES GARDEN, THODUPUZHA EAST. 4. PINKY POULOSE, PALLATHU, RAMAMANGALAM.P.O, ERNAKULAM. 5. PHILO SUMI, PAYYAPPILLY, NORTH EDATHALA.P.O. 6. S. PAUL MATHEW, PARAKATTIL HOUSE, KUMARAMANGALAM.P.O,THODUPUZHA - 685 597. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.KRISHNA SRI.PRATAP ABRAHAM VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL AND CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT, UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION IN ENGINEERING, VISWAJYOTHI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VAZHAKULAM, MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 670. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA.P.O, KOTTAYAM - 686 001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN, SRI.K.T.THOMAS. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC FOR M.G. UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.10918/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE MEMO DTD. 23.12.2010 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT TO 4TH PETITIONER. P2:- COPY OF THE MEMO ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH PETITIONER. P3:- COPY OF THE RPELY DTD. 14.3. 2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER P4:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. P5:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. P7:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. P8:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. P9:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).10918/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 19th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioners are 8th semester B.Tech students in the first respondent College. In the 7th semester examination, there was an allegation that the petitioners were committed certain malpractices as a result of which, the result of the 7th and 8th semesters has been withheld by the University. In the meantime, an enquiry was held and according to the petitioners, the Vice Chancellor has accepted the report and ordered to exonerate the petitioners. Ext.P11 is the communication issued to the first petitioner in this behalf and it is submitted that similar communications have been issued to other petitioners as well. Now the prayer sought for is that in view of the exoneration as per Ext.P11 and similar other communications, the withheld result of 7th and 8th semester examinations should be published urgently, so that they can produce their mark list before the companies which are already recruited. 2. Taking note of Ext.P11 which exonerates the petitioners, I see no reason why a direction shall not be issued to the University to publish the results the petitioners. W.P.(C).10918/11 2 Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the second respondent will publish the result of 7th and 8th semester examination of the petitioners and issue mark list to them, immediately thereafter, so that, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners, mark list could be produced before the respective employers, for securing employment. This the second respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within seven days of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs