-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3474 OF 2007 PETITION NO.3474 OF 2007 PETITION NO.3474 OF 2007 Nikhilesh M. Bhaide ...Petitioner vs. Amruta N. Bhaide ...Respondent Mr.A.I.I.Patel for the Petitioner CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 4, 2007. : JULY 4, 2007. : JULY 4, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner. By the impugned order dated 11th December 2006, the learned Judge of the Family Court, Mumbai directed the Petitioner-father to pay interim maintenance to the daughter at the rate of Rs.1500/- p.m. from June 2006 onwards. According to the case of the Petitioner, his salary is Rs.10,636/- p.m. and there are deductions totally amounting to Rs.5840/-. The substantial part of the deduction is towards housing loan. The present age of the daughter is 2 years. Considering the income of the Petitioner and status of the Petitioner, interim maintenance of Rs.1500/- p.m. fixed by the Family court is reasonable and no interference is called for in this Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Petition is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE