IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16676 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 07, 2011 Roshan Lal & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Joginder S. Duhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Petitioners claim technical pay and further claim that their case is covered by earlier decision rendered by this court. For the same cause, the petitioners have served a demand notice, which is still pending. Without going into the merits of the claim made, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the demand notice served by the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. September 07, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE