IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2503 of 2010 PRABHU SHAW @ PRABHU SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in complaint case no.361 of 2007 in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 419, 420 and 120 B of the I.P.C. Leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a bonafide purchaser of the land in question. He submits that petitioner has purchased certain lands from the son of the complainant. Entire dispute seems to be civil nature. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. In the aforesaid circumstances, let the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M, Nawadah in Complaint Case No.361 of 2007 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)