In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 2307 of 1991 (O&M) Sant Parkash and others ..... Appellants vs Ram Kishan and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None. Rajesh Bindal J. The dispute in the present appeal is to the apportionment of compensation on account of acquisition of land between the landlord and the tenant. Respondent Ram Kishan was found to be tenant on the land owned by the appellants which was acquired by the State of Haryana. He had produced on record jamabandi from the year 1960-61 till the acquisition showing his possession as gair marusi. The learned Court below considering the material on record apportioned the compensation as 1/3 : 2/3 between the tenant and the landlord. Prima facie, I do not find any reason to interfere. However, still as learned counsel for the appellants was not available, the appeal is dismissed in default. 15.2.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge