IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1188 of 2011() ------------------------ CRIME NO. 107/2010 OF CHANDERA POLICE STATION ................ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 : --------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.V.SARU, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O.LATE IBRAHIM, PATTILLATH HOUSE, CHOKKIKANDAM, PADANE P.O., PADANE VILLAGE, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 2. P.V.ABDULKHADER, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.LATE IBRAHIM, PATTILLATH HOUSE, CHOKKIKANDAM, PADANE P.O., PADANE VILLAGE, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SMT.T.SUDHAMANI RESPONDENTS / STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. TAJUDDIN P.P., S/O.ATTAKKOYA, FATHIMA MANZIL, NEAR NEW MASJID, THEKKEPPURAM, PADNE P.O. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. MANU R2 BY ADV. SMT. HEMALATHA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- Crl.MC.No. 1188 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE'S ANNEXURE - I : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F..I.R. IN CRIME 107OF 2010 OF CHANDERA POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE - II : AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE'S - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.1188 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 17th day of June, 2011 ORDER Petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.107 of 2010 of Chandera Police Station for offence punishable under Sec.420 r/w Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code. Second respondent filed a private complaint before learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Hosdurg alleging that petitioners cheated him by collecting `.2,50,000/- from him on the promise of arranging visa but failed to do so. That complaint was forwarded to the Chandera police for investigation. Police registered a case as above stated. Petitioners say that they have settled the matter with the second respondent and request to quash proceeding against them. I have heard learned counsel for petitioners, second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that after investigation the police has submitted final report before learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Hosdurg on 30.12.2010. Learned counsel for second respondent has submitted that second respondent has already given a statement to the police reporting that he has no further grievance in the matter since the Crl.M.C.No.1188 of 2011 -: 2 :- matter is settled. Learned counsel on both sides confirmed the settlement. Learned counsel for second respondent confirmed authenticity and genuineness of Annexure-II, affidavit of the second respondent. 3. So far as Crime No.107 of 2010 is concerned, only affected party is the second respondent and he has settled the case with petitioner. In view of that settlement, I do not consider it necessary that the proceeding should continue. Resultantly this criminal miscellaneous case is allowed. Final report in Crime No.107 of 2010 of Chandera Police Station and all proceeding if any initiated against petitioners by learned Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Hosdurg based on that final report are quashed. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-