IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6902 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- CMP.NO.4428/10 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KATTAKKADA. .......... (CRIME NO.75/2010 OF ARYANAD EXCISE RANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT) ..... PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------- SHAILAJA,D/O.SARASWATHI, THINAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, EDAVILAKATHU, KUTTICHAL PANCHAYATH, KOKKUDIMURI, MANOORKARA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN, SRI.K.SATHEESHKUMAR, SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------ Bail Application No. 6902 of 2010 ----------------------------------------- DATED: 3rd day of November, 2010 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime No.75/2010 of Aryanad Excise Range for offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 10 litres of spirit, seeks her enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that she has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under sec.41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify her release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. dmb