mm mm CD ”/52\W BEFORETHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (C)No. MHIH 12010 1' Sushil Kumar Meghani S/o. Shri Baruno Mal Meghani, aged about 47 years, R/o. Civil Line, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT //: Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through- it‘s Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) ”V x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH QOURTOF-CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR WRIT PETmON M Mo. 4414 of 2010 Petitioner Sushi! Kumar Maghani Versus Responden‘ Municipal Corporation‘ Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocae for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj AgrawaL Advocate for the respondent. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 11 day ofAugust,2010) 1. Learned counsel appea'ring for the respondent Corporation submits that there is no contemplation for demolition of any structure, which is duly legal and authorised. in respect of the petitioner, without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 2. Shri Agrawal further submits tha no demolition in respect of the property in dispute shall be done without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. in view of foregoing, nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with the above- stated observation. No order asto costs. ' Sd/- l Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok ~