IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26606 of 2008 Between: Prasad Nagar Plot Owners Welfare Association, MIG-A1, Sheelanagar, BHPV Post, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its President N. Ganghadhara Rao S/o. Late Narayana Rao, Aged about 65 Years, Hindu, R/o. MIG-A1, Sheelanagar, BHPV Post, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Assingment) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4 The Tahsildar, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents herein in not considering and forwarding the applications of the members of the petitioner association for regularization of their respective plots in Sy.No. 86 Part situated at Gajuwaka Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as per G.O.Ms.NO. 44, Revenue (Assignment-I) Department, dated 11-01-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and applications made by the members of the petitioner-association in respect of their respective plots in Sy.No. 86 part situated at Gajuwaka Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as per G.O.Ms.No. 44, Revenue (Assignment-I) Department, dated 11-01-2008 for regularization and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26606 of 2008 Order: Mr.K.S.R. Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, when pointed out that the individuals who are entitled to the benefit of G.O. Ms. No. 44, Revenue (Assignment –I) Department, dated 11.1.2008 have not filed the writ petition, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition and file appropriate writ petition by the persons who seek such benefit. Granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to do so, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ___________ V.V.S. RAO,J 5th December, 2008 pnb