:1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 225 OF 2008. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 81 OF 2008. WRIT PETITION NO. 81 OF 2008. WRIT PETITION NO. 81 OF 2008. Satish Ramgopal Borulkar, Govt. Pleader & PP, High Court, A.S. Mumbai. ..Applicant. Versus. Anandibai Pawanraje Nimbalkar. ..Respondent. --- Mr. Nitin Jamdar i/b Mr. V. V. Purwant for the for the respondent. Mr. S. R. Borulkar a/w Mrs. Purnima Kantharia APP for the Applicant. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE: August 8, 2008. DATE: August 8, 2008. DATE: August 8, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. We heard the parties. Ultimately after hearing the parties we find that still the fact remains on record that Ms. P. P. Kantharia, learned APP was not in a position to conduct the matter on 18th July 2008. We refrain from making any direct observations because we do not want to keep on record the unfortunate dirty linen of the functioning of the office of the Public Prosecutor. We take a sympathetic view in the matter and warn the learned Public Prosecutor that henceforth such type of behaviour will not be tolerated in this court and if we come across :2: :2: :2: such behaviour again, stern and strict action will be taken. In the circumstances, we recall the order dated 18th July 2008 to the extent of imposition of cost of Rs.15,000/-. The amount of Rs.15,000/- be returned back to the government. (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) /2008/VKT/Chamber/..