IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH APRIL 2011 / 9TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 12674 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------------- SUDHEER KUMAR, AGED 39, S/O.ADAMBAMKULATH MADATHIPARAMBIL BHANUMATHI AMMA, NELPINI DESOM, SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IRINJALAKUDA – 680 121. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATHILAKAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT – 690 001. 4. SHANLY VASUDEVAN, S/O.ERUMATHURATHY VASUDEVAN, NELPINI DESOM, SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK – 680 664. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.K.J.MOHAMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt THOMAS P. JOSEPH & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.12674 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 29th day of April 2011 J U D G M E N T Thomas P. Joseph, J. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking an order commanding respondents 3 and 4 not to harass petitioner or interfere with his family life and vocation, in the interest of justice. It is stated that the 4th respondent had addressed a letter to the petitioner stating that 4th respondent will commit suicide in case petitioner and his brother did not pay the amount (allegedly) due to the 4th respondent. Thereon petitioner preferred Ext.P1, complaint to the 2nd respondent, the DySP. Grievance of petitioner is that at the instance of the 4th respondent, the 3rd respondent (Sub Inspector of Police) is summoning petitioner and harassing him. 2. We have heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor W.P.(C). No.12674 of 2011 -: 2 :- submitted that in case it becomes necessary, the officer considering the complaint if any against petitioner would issue notice to the petitioner as provided under Sec.160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, “the Code”). 3. We record the said submission of the learned Public Prosecutor which is sufficient to allay the apprehension of petitioner. Resultantly this writ petition is disposed of recording the submission of learned Public Prosecutor that in case presence of petitioner is required in connection with any enquiry or investigation, the officer concerned will issue notice to the petitioner as provided under Sec.160 of the Code. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. Jvt