IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 20472 of 2005 Between: Jami Venkata Rao, Late Sanyasi Rao, Hindu, R/o. D.No.5-48-81/1, Bheemili Road, Tagarapuvalasa, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The Station House Officer, Bheemunipatnam Post and Mandal, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam. 3. Boyina Janardhana Rao, S/o. Sriramulu, Managing Partner Of Sri Padmalaya and Company, Srinagar, Opposite To RTC, Complex, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: ORDER: For declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. As seen from the material available on record, it seems that all the allegations of the petitioner made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition were clearly denied by the first respondent by filing a counter affidavit. As all the allegations were denied by the respondents, such disputed question of facts cannot be determined and decided by this Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since allegations made in the affidavit of the petitioner filed in support of the writ petition are baseless, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed, leaving open all the remedies available to the petitioner under law. No costs. ______________ (K.C. BHANU, J) Date: 06.10.2005 Ksn