IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.854 of 2009 RAJEEV KUMAR CHAUDHARY, son of Vinod Narayan Chaudhary, resident of Mohalla – Satpura Colony, P.S. Kazimuhammadpur, Distt. Muzaffarpur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Chief Engineer, P.W.D., Building Construction, Patna. 3. Executive Engineer, Building Division, Muzaffarpur. ----------- 02. 18.05.2010 Claim of the petitioner is for payment of a sum of Rs.49, 590/- for so-called work done by him in the year 2001- 02 for agreement No. 155 F-2. Counsel for the State is absolutely correct in raising an objection against the maintainability of the writ application to the extent that there is no material evidence about any agreement having been entered between the respondents and the petitioner or any evidence of the bill or the claim he has to raise upon the respondents or there is any acceptance of claim by any authority. Merely because statement has been made in the writ application without any supporting material or a chit of paper in support of the writ application, no order of payment can be made. Writ is a frivolous writ. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )