1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ARBITRATION) NO. 89 OF 2011 (M/s. Shri Gajanan Maharaj Construction Company vs. Nagarjuna Training Institute) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 23, 2011. Clause No. 11 in Agreement dated 08.12.2004 is claimed to be an Arbitration clause. After hearing Shri Naik, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Gadkari, learned counsel for the respondent, I find that Christopher Charles Benninger Architects Pvt. Ltd., (Architects and Urban Planners) has given his comments and observations in the light of obligation cast upon him by said clause No. 11. According to Shri Naik, learned counsel, these observations and comments are without any opportunity to the applicant. Both the learned counsel agree that the applicant can make fresh representation to said Architect and that Architect shall thereafter reconsider the observations and comments. For that, said Architect shall provide necessary opportunity to both sides. 2 In view of this agreement between the parties, present Misc. Civil Application is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.