IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 1ST ASWINA 1930 W.P(C).No. 10219 of 2006(N) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ROBINS.N.J, LAB ASSISTANT, ST.PAUL'S COLLEGE, KALAMASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION (D) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, ST.PAUL'S COLLEGE, KALAMASSERY. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.T.MOHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.10219/06 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DT 28.3.1994 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PRINCIPAL OF THE COLLEGE. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT 6.4.94 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DT 8.2.95 FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT 17.2.95 OF THE PRINCIPAL. EXT.P5(a): TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL DT 22.7.98. EXT.P5(b): TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER DT 29.7.98. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DT 9.9.02 OF THE PRINCIPAL OF THE PRINCIPAL TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DT 21.10.2003 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DT 27.1.2004 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT 24.12.05 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 10219 OF 2006 (N) ==================== Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P1. A reading of Ext.P1 shows that the claim for adhoc bonus of the petitioner was declined in view of the Government circular No.19/05/Fin dated 22/4/05. However, in this writ petition, apart from challenging Ext.P1, there is no challenge against the circular on the basis of which Ext.P1 was issued. 2. Since Ext.P1 has been rendered solely relying on the circular referred to above, in the absence of a challenge against the circular, petitioner cannot contend that the 1st respondent has gone wrong in rejecting his claim. In view of this, petitioner cannot get any relief in this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp