1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 789 OF 2003 Ipca Laboratories Limited ...Plaintiff vs. Maral Labs & Ors. ...Defendants Mr.Manish Saurastri i/b. M/s.Shantilal & Co. for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JANUARY 29, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the plaintiff. 2 The plaintiff has filed Consent Terms which are signed by the representative of the plaintiff and the Managing Partner of defendant no.1, sole proprietor of defendant no.2 and sole proprietor of defendant no.3 and by their respective Advocates. Though the Consent Terms were signed on 10th 2 December, 2003, the plaintiff has filed this Consent Terms today since according to him, the matter did not come upon the board. In the Consent Terms, defendant no.2 has agreed to execute a separate Deed of Assignment for the purpose of transferring and assigning the rights and claims in respect of trade mark PIOMED along with its goodwill. I am informed by the plaintiff that in fact, the defendant no.2 had executed the said separate Deed of Assignment and application was preferred by the plaintiff for a separate trade mark. In view of this, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked X for the purpose of identification. Suit is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. The plaintiff would be entitled for refund of court fees in accordance with the Rules. 3 Certified copy expedited. (V.M. KANADE, J.)