IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9940 of 2003 1. Sudarshan Prasad Singh, son of late Baleshwar Prasad Singh, resident of village Thanhaurma, P.S. Athmalgola, District Patna. 2. Md. Sayeed Ahmad, son of Md. Suleman, resident of Ramna Road, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna. 3. Madan Kumar Thakur, son of late Ijlas Thakur, Resident of Village Akbarpur, P.S. Rajpur, District Buxar. 4. Slauddin Ansari, son of late Chaituddin Snsari, Village Mumrjpur, P.S. Naubatpur, District Patna. ---------- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Health Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Director-in-chief, Health Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Deputy Director (Administration), Health Department, New Secretariat, Patna. 4. Deputy Director (TB), Health Services, Bihar, Agam Kuan, Patna. 5. The District Tuberculosis Officer, District T.B. Centre, Vaishali at Hazipur. 6. The District Tuberculosis Officer, District T.B. Centre, Buxar. 7. The Additional Chief Medical Officer, Patna. ----------- Respondents ----------- 3 20.09.2010 Having heard learned counsel for the parties in respect of following relief:- “1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the various memoes dated 11.7.2003, all issued under the signature of the Deputy Director (TB), Health Services, Bihar, Agamkuan, whereby and whereunder the petitioners have been directed to appear before him for verification of their certificates of Training and appointment letter in pursuance of the order dated 22.5.2002 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9256 and 12545 of 1999 and further a show-cause against 2 termination is to be asked from them and further for a direction upon the respondents to refrain from disturbing the petitioner in discharge of their duties.” and the limited submission of the petitioners that the order of this Court dated 22.5.2002 passed in CWJC No. 9256 and 12545 of 1999 was made basis for passing the impugned order and as such, judgment of this Court dated 22.5.2002 has been made subject matter of the Civil Review No. 133 of 2003, which, in case would succeed, would lead to annulment of the impugned order, this Court would dispose of this writ application by holding that the result of the Civil Review No. 133 of 2003 shall also govern the result of the case of the petitioner. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)