1 aost-16251-11.sxw mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER ST NO.16251 OF 2011 with CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO.16253 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER ST.NO.16251 OF 2011 Vinod Kumar Chaturved ..Appellant Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay ..Respondents Mr. Birendra Saraf, Mr. Radmin Khandekar and Mr. Himanshu Pradhan i/b Crawford Bayley & Co. for the Appellant Mrs. K.K.Soraan for the Respondent CORAM:- J.H.BHATIA, J DATED :- JUNE 24, 2011. P.C. 1 The Learned Counsel for the Appellant makes a statement that the Appellant proposes to make an Application under Section 53(C)(3) of MRTP Act for regularisation and retention of the alleged construction and therefore, he wants to withdraw the Appeal as well as the Suit from the Trial Court. 2 The Appeal and Civil Application stand disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to move such application. 3 If such application is moved within four weeks from this date, the authorities shall decide the said application on its own merits within a period of 8 weeks thereafter. Till the decision of that application the Respondent shall not act upon the impugned notice. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)