THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD WRIT APPEAL No.571 of 2011 Date:20.07.2011 Between: Ravuri Tirupathi Naidu and others ..Appellants And Batula Venkata Subba Reddy and others ..Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD WRIT APPEAL No.571 of 2011 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) At the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, the writ appeal itself is taken up for hearing at the admission stage. The appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 29.04.2011 disposing of W.P.No.13211 of 2011 filed by the first respondent herein as under: “The petitioner has prayed that directions be issued to the respondents to act on her representation dated 15.4.2011 vide which he has requested for police protection. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner had filed W.P. No. 21936 of 2004 which was disposed of vide order dated 11.8.2005 directing the official respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the land in question, except in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the aforementioned orders, the persons who have rival claims against the petitioner are trying to interfere with his possession over the land in question. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to look into the aforementioned representation filed by the petitioner and take appropriate action, if necessary, in accordance with law expeditiously. No order as to costs.” The appellants complain that under the guise of the above order, the official respondents are unlawfully interfering with their possession of the scheduled property. On a true and fair construction of the order in the writ petition, there is no direction to the official respondents to dispossess the appellants or any person. The order merely calls upon the Superintendent of Police, Nellore, to look into the writ petitioner’s representation and to take appropriate action, if necessary, in accordance with law, expeditiously. This order per se does not cause prejudice to the appellants. On the aforesaid premises, the Writ Appeal is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage. _______________ GODA RAGHURAM, J ________________ P.DURGA PRASAD, J 20th July, 2011 GHN