IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2008 / 2ND MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1736 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28201/2007 Dated 04/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER --------------- KOCHURANI PAUL, AGED 47, W/O.T.J.PAUL, THOTTAKATH HOUSE, KOTHAD, KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.RUSSEL RESPONDENT: ---------------- MUHAMMED HANEESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/0.A.P.M.MACKEY, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, TRIKKAKARA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== Cont.Case(C) NO. 1736 OF 2007 S ====================== Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this contempt case, complaint is regarding the disobedience of Annexure A 1 judgment in WP(C) No.28201/07. By that judgment dealing with the allegation of encroachment, it was directed that survey will be conducted and in case of encroachment, appropriate action will be taken. 2. It is now submitted by the learned Government pleader that subsequent to the judgment referred to above, survey has been conducted and that the area has been demarcated. It is also stated that on the strength of the report prepared by the Village Officer, action for eviction will have to be taken by the Minor Irrigation Department and that necessary intimation has been given to the Executive Engineer of the Cont.Case No.1736/07 :2 : Irrigation Department. If that be so, there is no reason to think that the respondent herein has disobeyed the judgment warranting proceedings against him under the Contempt of Courts Act. Contempt case is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp