IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.134 of 2010 SRI PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE CHANDRIKA SINGH R/O VILL- BRAHAMLAL BIGHA, P.S- KARAPI, DISTT- ARWAL ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENRAL, CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECRUTIY FORCE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, 13- C.D.O. COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-03. 3. THE CENTRAL PENSION ACCOUNTING OFFICER, GOVT. OF INDIA, TRIKOOT-2, BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI- 110066. ---Respondents ----------- 3. 4.2.2010 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents no.1, 2 and 3 after serving a copy of the same on the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit, wherein it is stated that the steps have been taken for redressal of the grievances, the petitioner is not pressing the writ application. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)