HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22184 of 2008 Date : 07.06.2011 Between : Smt. Nallabai Sarasamma & another. …..Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22184 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioners in this writ petition claim that they are owners and possessors of land admeasuring Ac.1.46 cents each, covered by Survey Nos.767/1B and 769/1C of Madamanuru village of Manubolu Mandal in Nellore District. It is their grievance that one person by name Shaik Sultan Saheb is not allowing them to cultivate their lands, as such, they have submitted representations, dated 11th August 2008 and 28th of September 2008 to the respondents, but inspite of the same, no steps are being taken on such representations. When the matter came up on 18.04.2011, this Court, after noticing the fact that the allegations are made against one Shaik Sultan Saheb but he is not made party- respondent in the writ petition, while rejecting the application for interim orders, posted the writ petition for hearing. Even by this time, no steps have been taken for impleading the said person against whom allegations are made in the writ petition. In any event, petitioners in their representations dated 11th August 2008 and 28th of September 2008, are seeking the relief of protecting their possession, against one Mr.Shaik Sultan Saheb, who is not before this Court. Even according to the petitioners as their representations are still pending before the respondents, it is not desirable for this Court to pass any orders restraining a third party from interference. If there is any interference with the possession of petitioners, it is open for them to approach competent civil Court seeking the relief of injunction, but under the guise of filing representations dated 11th August 2008 and 28th of September 2008, they cannot seek any relief against Mr.Shaik Sultan Saheb, who is not made party- respondent in this writ petition. For the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners to approach competent civil Court for relief against Mr.Shaik Sultan Saheb, if there is any interference by such person with the possession of petitioners over the lands in question. Subject to the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 7th June 2011 ajr