IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2563 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 21, 2010 Gurmail Singh and others. …Petitioners Versus M/s Page-3 Restaurant. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he would be content and interests of justice would be served, if the matter is ordered to be disposed of by the learned Rent Controller by noticing licence deed dated 28.11.2005 which had been placed on record, but the same was not noticed by the learned Rent Controller. The petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order shall stand set aside. The learned Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the said controversy afresh by noticing the licence deed dated 28.11.2005. The matter shall be listed before the learned Rent Controller on 23.04.2010 and it shall be disposed of on 23.04.2010 itself. Disposed of accordingly. A copy of the order be given to the learned counsel for the petitioners under the signatures of the Special Secretary. April 21, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge