IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 19469 of 2005 BETWEEN: Mr. Abdullah Rahman, S/o Abdullah Saleh, R/o 14-1-171/A, Seetarampet, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Having office at Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief City Planner, M.C.H. Office at Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant City Planner, T.P. Section, Circle No.2, MCH Office at Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any other appropriate writ and more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of the respondents as illegal, high handed, arbitrary and against the spirit of constitution in not granting sanction plan to the petitioner for construction in respect of his house property bearing No.14-1-171/A, admeasuring 100 sq. yards, situated at Seetarampet, Hyderabad, in spite of the judgment & decree passed in O.S.No.885/96 on the file of VII Junior Civil Judge City Civil Court, Hyderabad and also several application submitted by him and insisting on T.S.L.R. and direct the respondents to grant sanction for construction to the petitioner property House bearing No.14-1-171/A, admeasuring 100 sq. yards situated at Seetarampet, Hyderabad and may be pleased to pass any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NAZIR AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. 2. When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 16.07.2008, as none appeared for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default of the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 23, 2008 DSK