1 IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT PATENT PATENT APPEAL NO. 142 OF 1995 APPEAL NO. 142 OF 1995 APPEAL NO. 142 OF 1995 The Solapur Municipal Corporation ... Appellants Vs. Shri. Shivprasad Ramji Gaikwad and others ... Respondents Mr. Vineet B. Naik for Appellant. Ms. Angeline Rodrigues for Respondent No. 1. Mr. A.P. Vanarshe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : AUGUST 18, 2004 P.C. : . The matter was adjourned on the last occasion to enable the learned counsel to take instructions. The learned counsel states that he has received telephonic instructions that the respondent has been regularised and even otherwise when the scheme which was referred to in the order of this court dated 13.12.1995 is implemented. He was however, waiting for written instructions. Considering the fact that oral instructions have been received, the appeal has become infructuous. Hence, appeal 2 disposed of as infructuous. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)