IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( MAIN ) NO. 106 OF 2007 SMT. RICHA SUDHIR PARIHAR, PONDA, GOA. ... Applicant Versus MRS. REENA SINGH BHADURIA, MUMBAI ... Respondent Mr. P. P. Singh,Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Iftikar Aga,Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 13th March, 2008 P.C. Heard. The petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 7.2.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge,Panaji whereby the revision application filed by the respondent against the issue of process in criminal case No.41/P/2005/D has been set aside and the complaint has been dismissed. The revisional Court has clearly found that there was no substance in the material which could justify the issuance of the process in the matter U/s.504, 506 part II and 499 r/w. Section 34 of I.P.C. against the respondent and her husband. The said findings have been arrived at on detail analysis of the materials on record. I find no justification for the interference in the impugned order as the findings arrived at nowhere disclose any sort of perversity nor they are contrary to the materials on record. On mere assumption that the respondent herein along with her husband might have given threats to the petitioner, without any cogent material in support thereto, the petitioner had rushed to the Court. There is nothing on record to show that the alleged threats were actually given by the respondent and her husband and hence, the order of issuing process in the matter has been passed. In these circumstances, I found no fault in the order nor it discloses any illegality, nor it warrants interference. Hence, the application is dismissed. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. SMA