IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2208 of 2010 1. VINAY KUMAR S/O RAM NIWASH SINGH R/O MOHALLA- NEW AREA, GARHPUR, NAWADA, P.S. & P.O.- NAWADA, DISTT.- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE 4. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA 5. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PHULWARISHARIF, PATNA 6. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, PHULWARISHARIF POLICE STATION, DISTT.- PATNA 7. UDAY SHANKAR S/O NAME NOT KNOWN R/O MOHALLA- CHOUDHARY TOLA, P.S.- SULTANGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA 8. MANJU DEVI W/O VIDYA SHANKAR SINGH R/O MOHALLA- CHOUDHARY TOLA, P.S.- SULTANGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA 9. RAMAYAN SHARMA S/O NAME NOT KNOWN R/O MOHALLA- CHOUDHARY TOLA, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA 10. SHAILENDRA SINGH S/O LATE KAILASH SINGH R/O VILL. & P.O.- NADAWAN, P.S.- BARH, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 2/ 18/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner, his grievances are primarily against private respondent Nos.7 to 10. He has more than adequate remedy against them under the Cr.P.C. or the civil law as he may be advised. Insofar as maintenance of law and order on the spot is concerned, from the counter affidavit of respondent Nos.4 to 6 it is more than apparent that they have taken adequate steps for the same. The writ application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)