IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16986 of 2010 ABDANA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 7.5.2010 The order of cognizance is challenged which is left for one of the accused persons Salahuddin @ Mukarram. According to learned counsel, protest was filed after submission of charge sheet which was exonerating the above named accused but material collected by the I.O. was taken into consideration and cognizance was taken for rest of accused persons while the revision in question was called at the stage of admission, none was there to justify, calling of the record to look into the illegality if was existing. Illegality shown as submitted is not to be looked at the stage as protest petition was not taken as independent complaint. Now only remedy remains with the victim to press for summoning of above accused persons on appearing of additional evidence. Thus, I find no justification to restore the revision petition. Accordingly, the restoration application is dismissed. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)