E. S. A. No. 14 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : E. S. A. No. 14 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : May 20, 2011 Ram Singh .... Appellant Vs. Meer Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the appellant. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : C. M. No. 6227-C of 2011 : Allowed as prayed for. Main Appeal : Objector Ram Singh, having failed in both the courts below, has filed the instant second appeal. Respondent no.1 – Decree Holder has filed execution petition against respondents no.2 and 3 – Judgment Debtors. Ram Singh – appellant herein filed objections in the said execution petition. Learned Executing Court i.e. learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari, vide impugned E. S. A. No. 14 of 2011 (O&M) 2 order dated 20.10.2010, dismissed the said objections. First appeal preferred by Objector Ram Singh against the said order has also been dismissed by learned District Judge, Rewari, vide impugned judgment dated 09.05.2011. Feeling still aggrieved, Objector Ram Singh has filed the instant Execution Second Appeal. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the case file. The Objector – appellant claimed rights in the suit land on the basis of compromise decree dated 24.03.2006 passed by this Court in some Regular Second Appeal, to which respondent no.1 – Decree Holder was not party. However, admittedly, appellant herein had suffered consent decree dated 22.11.1995 in favour of his wife Shakuntala regarding the suit land. In view of said consent decree, Objector – appellant is left with no right, title or interest in the suit land, and therefore, has no locus standi to file any objections in the execution petition. For the reasons aforesaid, the instant second appeal is found to be meritless and is, therefore, dismissed in limine. May 20, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE