IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.687 of 2011 1. Governing Body of Vidyanand Mithila Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Sankat Mochandham Darbhanga, through the Secretary,Dr. Uddist Narayan Jha. 2. Dr. Uddisht Narayan Jha, S/o Late Pandit Jaisudan Jha, R/o Gangwara, P.O. Sara, P.S. Sadar, District Darbhanga, Secretary of the Vidyanand Mithila Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Sankat Mochandham Darbhanga. 3. The President of the Governing Body of Vidyanand Mithila Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Sankat Mochandham Darbhanga. 4. Sh. Ajit Kumar Chaudhary, S/o Late Krishna Kant Chaudhary, R/o Mohalla Balbhadrapur, P.O. & P.S. Laheriasarai, District Darbhanga, President of the Governing Body of Vidyanand Mithila Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Sankat Mochandham Darbhanga……………………..….Respondents. Versus 1. The Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University having its office at Raj Bhawan, Patna. 2. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University through its Registrar, Darbhanga 3. The Vice Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Darbhanga 4. Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University, Darbhanga 5. Dr. Rameshwar Singh, Principal, Veer Kunwar Singh College, Darbhanga 6. Sh. Nagendra Nath Jha, s/o not known to the petitienr, R/o Village & P.O. Khajedih, Ladaniya, Madhubani. 7. Sh. Raju Vidyarthi, Lecturer in English, Dr. Jagannath Mishra Sanskrit College, Pastan, Madhubani. 8. Incharge Principal, Vidyanand Mithila Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, Sankat Mochandham Darbhanga…………………………………………………………….Respondents ----------- For the Petitioners: Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.8: Mr. Durga Nand Jha, Advocate For the University: Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Advocate 2 10.02.2011 But for the fact that the petitioners, the Incharge Principal and Secretary of the Governing Body of the 2 Vidyanand Mithila Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya, have already approached the Chancellor, vide Annexures 22 and 23, as pointed out by learned counsel for the University, this Court was prima facie satisfied that, on absolutely vague allegations, the Committee, constituted by the Syndicate, recommended for dissolution of the Governing Body of 13 Colleges at a stretch and constitution of the Ad hoc Committee by the Vice Chancellor and, Vice Chancellor, by issuing the impugned notification dated 17.12.2010, vide Annexure-21, constituted an Ad hoc Committee for the college in question. However, since the jurisdiction of the Chancellor has already been invoked, this Court does not feel it appropriate to allow parallel proceeding to go on. Therefore, as prayed for, the writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to petitioners to approach the Chancellor for early hearing of the matter and for considering applications on their behalf for interim orders. In view of the facts of the case, if such an 3 application is filed by the petitioners, this Court will appreciate if the Chancellor takes up the matter and considers the application for interim orders at the earliest possible opportunity. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)