1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5187/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO:3881/2004 (Ashok s/o Ganpatlal Chamediya and 2 others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. CORAM: D.D. SINH A & Smt. V.A.NAIK , JJ. DATED: 21 st January, 2008. *** Heard Shri S.P.Kshirsagar, learned counsel for petitioners/applicants; learned AGP for Respondents 1 ands 2 ; Shri S.V.Akolkar, for Respondent no.3 and Shri Bhuibhar, for Respondents 4 to 6. 2. C.A. No. 5187/2005 is moved by the petitioners/applicants for disposal of the Petition. Learned counsel for petitioners states that the Respondent no.3 who has filed Revision before the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati has no locus standi and, therefore, appropriate direction in this regard be given . 3. Considered the contention. If the Revision is 2 pending before the Commissioner, it is always open for the applicants to point out to the Commissioner whether the Revision filed by respondent no.3 is maintainable or not. 4. With this observation, Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE sahare