..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.76 OF 2007 Bhagwan Dada Wagh ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Vinod Shah, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. DATED : 20th February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under sections 363 & 366 of IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for three years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted by the ..(2).. prosecution. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 5. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Nandgaon Police Station, Nashik once in a fortnight, till disposal of his Appeal. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)