1 MCA NO.65 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2011 9 SHITAL PRAVIN VETAL VERSUS PRAVIN PANDURANG VETAL ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mrs.M S Jagtap Advocate for Respondents :Mr. G.K.Kshirsagar, Adv., for the respondent. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. Dated: December 12, 2011 ... . PER COURT :- 1. Learned Counsel for respondent - Pravin Pandurang Vetal – has filed Vakalatnama. 2. Heard. The petitioner has urged for transfer of HMP No.94/2011 from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, to the Court at Ahmednagar, asserting that she has three/four cases at Ahmednagar and it would be convenient for her to have the matrimonial proceedings at Ahmednagar, instead of Pune. 3. Learned Counsel for the wife now, after arguing the matter, seeks accommodation for a week, which I do not find from the record, to be entertained. 2 MCA NO.65 OF 2011 4. The fact situation about the wife applicant to be in service may be ignored, however, the distance between the two places is not a far off for the wife, educated lady, to travel. Care can also be taken of the infant. This includes the husband, he is bound to pay travel and diet charges if the wife is required to travel from Ahmednagar or her parental house to the Court at Pune. 5. In the above situation, petition lacks merit, dismissed. m ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) ... agp/65-11mca