1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4984 OF 2009 Sunderabai w/o Santram Kachave, Age: 65 years, Occ: Agri. & Household, R/o. Lanji, Tq. Ahmedpur, District Latur and another. ..Petitioners Versus Balaji s/o Madhavrao Kachave, Age: 49 years, Occ: Agril., R/o. Lanji, Tq. Ahmedpur, District Latur and others. .. Respondents ... Mr. N.G. Kale, Advocate for petitioners. ... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 31st JULY, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are 2 challenging the order dated 08-07-2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ahmedpur below Exhibit-192 in R.C.S. No.81/1986. 3. The petitioners filed R.C.S. No. 81/1986 for partition and separate possession. In that suit, original defendant No. 2 filed application dated 09-08-2005 under Section 8 of the Bombay Court Fees Act to inquire about the valuation of the suit property. In the said application, original defendant No. 2 prayed as under. "By allowing this petition the enquiry about valuation of the suit house properties mentioned in both suits may kindly be done by the Hon'ble Court as it deems fit and necessary before proceeding further in this matter in the interest of justice." 4. Said application was allowed by the trial Court and directed the Deputy Engineer, P.W.D. Ahmedpur to determine value of the suit house properties and submit his report on or before 3 08-08-2009 after due inquiry, at the cost of original defendant No.2. 5. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners state that because of this, hearing of the suit will be delayed. In any case, the trial Court has not passed any order to stay further proceedings in suit. Therefore, I do not find any merit in the present Writ Petition and same is dismissed, with no order as to costs. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/JUL09/wp4984.09