HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.No.16361 of 2011 ORDER: Land classified as “Chelkam Cheruvu”, admeasuring Ac.4- 00 in Sy.No.13 of Bandlaguda village and mandal, Hyderabad District, is claimed to be under the occupation of the petitioners for several decades. The proceedings under challenge in this writ petition is the notice dated 17.3.2011 informing the petitioners that an enquiry, under Section 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Summonses Act, 1858, was proposed to be held wherein the petitioners attendance was considered necessary to produce, the documents. Section 4 of the A.P. Revenue Summonses Act, 1858 enables any person to be summoned to produce a document and, in case he produces such a document, it is deemed that he has complied with the summons. Even when these proceedings dated 17.3.2011 is under challenge in this Writ Petition, the petitioners assert that the 3rd and 4th respondents were trying to forcibly take possession of the subject land misusing their official position. The impugned proceedings dated 17.3.2011 merely calls upon the petitioner to produce the documents listed therein. Nothing prevented the petitioners from complying with such a request. However, in the light of the specific assertion that the 3rd and 4th respondents were trying to forcibly take possession of the land, I consider it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the respondents 2 to 5 not to evict the petitioners from the land under their occupation except in accordance with law, after putting them on notice, and giving them an opportunity of being heard. I, however, see no reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 17.3.2011 which is merely a proceedings requiring the petitioners to produce certain documents. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. ___________ 02-09-2011 asp