Crl. Misc. No. M-29694 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-29694 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.11.2011. Rajni .......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI Present: Mr. A.K.Handa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. ..... M.M.S.BEDI, J. (ORAL) Learned state counsel has opposed the application contending that the petitioner is guilty of having made complainant to inhale some intoxicant facilitating the crime by Surjit Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, has submitted that it is a case of run away marriage and the father of the prosecutrix had also lodged a complaint with the police regarding the prosecutrix having left home after committing theft of ` 1,00,000/-. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, taking into consideration that the petitioner has been in custody w.e.f. 07.7.2011 and no possibility of conclusion of the trial in near future, petitioner can be granted the concession of Crl. Misc. No. M-29694 of 2011 (O&M) -2- regular bail. Petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE November 18, 2011 Gurpreet