The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.22135 of 2010 Date: 15-11-2011 Between: S.Veerabhadraiah Goud and others ..... Petitioners AND The Proh. & Excise Inspector, Station House Officer, Serilingampally, Ranga Reddy District, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad and others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Amarnath Goud Thodupunuri Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Prohibition & Excise The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring proceedings in Cr.No. B2/1536/2009, dated. 30.07.2010 of the 2nd respondent in cancelling the licence of the petitioners without furnishing the reports of the 1st respondent dated 30.03.2010 and 03.06.2010, without conducting a fair enquiry, without giving an opportunity of personal hearing is liable to be set aside as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of natural justice and further grant consequential relief.” At the hearing, Sri Amarnath Goud Thodupunuri, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submitted that, during the pendency of this Writ Petition, one of the samples sent for analysis to independent laboratory was found unadulterated; that on the basis of the said report, the investigation officer has dropped all further proceedings in the Criminal Case by filing a report before the jurisdictional Magistrate and that on the basis of the said report, the Criminal Case was closed. The learned Counsel further submitted that in view of this subsequent event, the petitioners have made a representation on 19-05-2011 for reconsidering the order of cancellation and that the same is pending before respondent No.2. The learned Counsel requested that, without going into the merits of the case, respondent No.2 may be directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners’ representation in accordance with law. In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, without going into the validity or otherwise of the cancellation order, impugned in this Writ Petition, and with the direction to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation, if any, received from the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel, WPMP.No.28197 of 2011, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 15th November, 2011 LUR