IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20330 of 2011 Md. Moinuddin, S/o – Nejamuddin, resident of village – Mirzapur, P.S. – Madhaudha, District – Saran. ------- Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar ---Opposite Party ----------- 02. 14.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-1491/2011 for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali, being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. It is submitted during the course of argument that before learned Sessions Judge also he made an offer to resume and continue his marital life with the complainant. Matter was turned down by the complainant. However, he still intends to do so and in order to show bonafide of such intention a sum of Rs. 1000/- per month by way of ad interim maintenance he is offered to be paid to the complainant till dispute is resolved. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing an application before the 2 court below stating all such intention with an offer to pay the above amount (1000/- per month) subject to any order of competent court on the point, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Moinuddin, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali, in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-1491/2010 subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates and non-payment of single installment, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)