1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2280 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.7.2010 Het Ram .. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G, for respondents No.1 to 4. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer. According to the petitioner, Gramin Vidya Upasak is not covered under rationalization scheme. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to examine the matter and pass an appropriate orders in accordance with law and communicate the petitioner. Till such orders are passed, interim order passed by this Court shall continue. The writ 2 petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 13, 2010 (Kuldip Singh), (GR/Veena) Judge.