IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 23RD MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 31236 of 2006(R) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O.LATE NEELAKANDAN, VATTATHARA THEKKETHIL, SOORANAD NORTH, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BEURO OF ENTERPRISES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, KERALA, KAKKANAD, KOCHI. 3. SRI.ABDUL SALIM, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR CHRISTIAN CONVERTS FROM SCHEDULED CASTE AND RECOMMENDED COMMUNITIES LTD., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.RADHAKRISHNAN, CGC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.C NO. 31236/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE G.O.(MS) NO.59/80/DD DT.12.6.80. EXT,P2:- COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY. .EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.30.10.06 SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE FORM NO.32 OF THE CORPORATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.16.10.06. .EXT.P4(a):- COPY OF THE FORM NO.32 OF THE CORPORATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4(b):- COPY OF THE FORM NO.32 OF THE CORPORATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.31236 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT Heard. 2. Having regard to the nature of allegations raised in this writ petition and in view of the interim order dated 1.12.2006, it is directed that the first respondent will bestow due attention to the allegations made regarding the functioning of the Kerala State Development Corporation for Christian Converts from Scheduled Castes and Recommended Communities Ltd. This writ petition is disposed of directing that such decision shall be taken untrammeled by anything stated in this judgment. The petitioner is directed to place a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. If any action is found necessary, that shall follow, as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Judge kkb.