IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6387 of 2010. Decided on: 29th December, 2010. Dinesh Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “That the respondents may be directed to allow the petitioner to be continue in the same post/same capacity under which he was working and the appointment of respondent No.5 dated 30.8.2010 may kindly be quashed and set-aside.” 2. It appears that the dispute between the petitioner and PTA Committee has to be resolved by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi/Competent Authority, since he is the competent authority under the PTA Policy. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed as follows:- In the event of the petitioner approaching the Deputy Commissioner Mandi, within a period of one month from today, the matter shall be duly considered by the said authority after affording an 2 opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondents No. 4 and 5 and appropriate order in accordance with law shall be passed within another two months. 2. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of so also the pending application (s), if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 29th December, 2010 ( Justice V.K. Sharma), (Karan/kck) Judge.