1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.343 OF 1993. FIRST APPEAL NO.343 OF 1993. FIRST APPEAL NO.343 OF 1993. Shri Deepak C. Leelwani : Appellant. versus Shri Gautam Kumar Banarjee and others. : Respondents. Mr.Vinod Tayade for the appellant None for the respondents. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 4th April 2005. DATED : 4th April 2005. DATED : 4th April 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard advocate for the appellant. Nobody is present for the respondents. The appellant is the original claimant who was a student suffered in an accident in which his left leg got fractured. He claimed Rs.90,000/-. The tribunal awarded him Rs.35,000/-. Therefore, this appeal 2 2 2 for enhacement. 2. Counsel for the appellant contended that looking to the injuries of the appellant, it is clear that he was required to undergo treatment for a considerable long period and was also required to undergo operation. There is no evidence in that regard. The doctor has stated that patient/claimant will have to undergo physio therapy treatment for two months. The injury has not resulted any permanent disability either total or partial. So whatever pains and sufferings he had undergone and, the medical expenses incurred by him, he has adequately been compensated by the tribunal. No further compensation is required to be granted. There is no merit in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. [D.G.DESHPANDE] 04/04/2005 JUDGE.