1 wp.1869-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1869 OF 2011 Major Ramesh Shivaji Upadhyay ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. ----- Ms. Indu Varma, appointed Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. Ms. Rohini Salian, Special PP for National Investigating Agency. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. AUGUST 03, 2011. P.C.: 1. We have heard Ms. Varma, the learned appointed Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Salian, the learned Special Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner has made the following three prayers: i] Orders of the learned Judge Y.D. Shinde on Exhibits 291 and 293 may kindly be set aside, and relief as prayed be kindly be granted. The certified copies of the impugned orders is 2 wp.1869-2011 enclosed. ii] Learned MCOC Judge Shri Y.D. Shinde may kindly be not appointed as a presiding officer of Special N.I.A. Court, if such prayer is made by the State of Maharashtra or Union of India, due to lack of faith in him by this accused. iii] All the orders of Hon’ble Judge Shri Y.D.Shinde which are not interlocutory orders may kindly be reviewed, on appeal.” 3. So far as petitioner’s second prayer is concerned, the same cannot be considered, and if he is aggrieved by any order passed by the learned Special Judge appointed under the MCOC Act, the petitioner has the remedy to file an appeal under Section 12 of the said Act. 4. Hence, the Petition is rejected with liberty to challenge the orders on Exhibits 291 and 293 by way of an appeal. 5. Let this order be communicated to the petitioner. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.) 3 wp.1869-2011