PNP 1 NM397-15.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGNAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.397 OF 2010 IN APPEL NO.667 OF 2005 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.299 OF 1994 Sumeet Machines Ltd. ..Appellant. versus Varkey Overseas Trading Co.Pvt. Ltd. ..Orig. Respondent. And Standard Chartered Bank ..Intervenor/Applicant versus The Court Receiver, High Court Bombay and another ..Respondents. ..... Mr. A.C. Mahimkar for the Appellant. Ms. Rohini T. Kachare i/b Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the Applicant/ Intervenor. Ms. Gayatri Singh for the Applicant workmen. Mr. Sandeep S. Kumbhar i/b Mr. S.A. Bhagat for the Official Liquidator. Mr. Rahul Mascarnhans i/b Amarchand Mangaldas and S.A. Shroff & Co. for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ. 15 November 2010. PNP 2 NM397-15.11 P.C. : This Motion has been taken out by Standard Chartered Bank who is an Intervenor / Applicant in the Appeal. The Applicant had filed an application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal seeking permission to inspect the property which is in the custody of the Court Receiver. The Debt Recovery Tribunal considered itself to be constrained by the fact that the appeal is pending before this Court in which certain orders had been passed. Hence, liberty was granted to the Applicant to move this Court for appropriate relief. Accordingly the prayer in the Motion is for directing the Court Receiver to fix an appointment for inspection of the property so as to permit the Applicant to take inspection and to value the property. The Application has not been opposed either on behalf of the Appellant or the Respondent. Counsel for the workmen also has no objection. In these circumstances, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)