IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29320 of 2010 SANJEEV KUMAR @ PUTTU MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 03/ 02.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 20.6.2009 in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case no.357/2008 registered under section 302/34 of the IPC. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name came in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused. Although the learned Sessions Judge has referred so many paragraphs in the impugned order but it has specifically asserted by the petitioner at paragraph 8 of this petition that all aforesaid paragraphs are nothing but only confessional statements of co-accused persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that so many co-accused have already been granted regular bail and so far as the petitioner is concerned, at the time of alleged occurrence he was in jail custody. Although petitioner carries criminal history of several cases but as per paragraph 9 of the petition, petitioner has already been enlarged on bail in almost all the above stated cases either by this court or by the learned court below. In the aforesaid circumstances, petitioner (Sanjeev Kumar @ Puttu Mishra) is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case no. 357 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs - 2 - 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagha, West Champaran subject to the condition that petitioner shall present himself before the learned trial court for the period of six months on each and every date and if he fails to do so without any valid reason on two consecutive dates, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)