IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37973 of 2008 DHURI RAVIDAS @ KHUDI RAVIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.11.2008 Heard Smt. Anjana Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Sections 364, 302 etc IPC and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. There is a huge number of statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C of different witnesses but those also do not contain the name of the present petitioner. The mere implication of the petitioner is through a confessional statement of the co-accused and the contention is that there could be many reasons for the false implication of the petitioner. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J.Ist, Jehanabad in S.T.No.9 of 2008(Sakurabad P.S.Case No.70 of 2003). B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )