SA No. 677 of 2001 (Old No. 2926 of 1979) Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. (Delay Condonation Application No. 9257 of 2006) Heard learned counsel for the appellant on the delay condonation application and perused the affidavit filed in support thereto. I find sufficient ground to condone the delay in filing the substitution application. Accordingly, the delay condonation application is allowed. Application for Setting Aside Abatement No. 9258 of 2006 Substitution Application No. 9259 of 2006 Heard learned counsel for the appellant on the substitution application as well as setting aside abatement application and perused the affidavit filed in support thereto. Substitution application is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to incorporate the proposed legal heir of appellant No. 1 in the memo of appeal within a period of three days. Sri V.K. Bist, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant. Consequently, the application for setting aside the abatement is also disposed of. Misc. Application No. 12024 of 2006 Heard Sri V.K. Bisht, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf for the appellant and Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondents on the misc. application and perused the record. Miscellaneous application has been filed by both the parties stating therein that both the parties have entered into compromise, therefore, the appeal be decided in terms of the compromise. Having considered the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is finally disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 22.09.2006 ASWAL