IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 16991 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2011 Parvinder ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Hitinder Singh Lalli, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Chander Bhan, submitted that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been enlarged on bail by the learned trial court on 12.08.2011 Ordered accordingly. Still it is required to be ascertained as to whether the factum of pendency of the present petition before this Court was mentioned in the bail application filed by the petitioner before the court below, as the present petition was filed in this Court on 28.05.2011, in which notice of motion has been issued on 01.06.2011 for 08.08.2011. Let a report be called from the court concerned for 31.10.2011. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 23.09.2011 sharmila