M. Cr.C. No.7202/2011 03/10/2011 Shri Virendra Sharma, learned Counsel for the applicant. Shri Santosh Paneriya, learned Panel Lawyer the respondent /State. By this second application filed under section 439 of the Cr.P.C., applicant Sunitabai has moved the application for grant of bail being implicated in crime No.82/2009 registered by police Maksi, District Shajapur for offence under Section 302/34, 307 of the IPC. Counsel for the applicant has vehemently urged that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. Besides the applicant is a lady of 50 years of age and the entire family had been roped in on the statements of Kunwarbai, the wife of the deceased. Counsel further stated that there is no previous enmity between the parties and the dispute arose on the spot all of a sudden. Even if the prosecution allegations are considered, Counsel stated that the allegation against the present applicant is that he was holding the hand of the deceased. Moreover, Counsel stated that the cause of death of the deceased was due to a single blow, which indicated that there is no intention to murder. Counsel stated that the entire family had been roped in the offence and the son of the present applicant has already been granted bail by the Juvenile Court. Hence, Counsel has prayed for grant of bail since she has been arrested on 6/7/2011 and is suffering. Counsel for the respondent State, on the other hand, has opposed the submissions of the Counsel for the applicant and has stated that the applicant was fully involved in the offence. However, he has candidly admitted that there was only a single injury received on the parietal region of the body of the deceased. However. Counsel has prayed for dismissal of the application. On considering the above submissions, material available in the case diary and looking to the nature of allegations, I find that the application for grant of bail needs to be allowed on humanitarian ground since the applicant is a lady and she is in jail since 6/7/2011 and it is hereby allowed in the interest of justice. However, stringent condition needs to be imposed. It is ordered that the applicant be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for her appearance before the concerned trial Court on all dates of hearing as may be fixed by the Trial Court in this behalf during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that the applicant shall attend on each date of hearing of her trial before the concerned Court out of which this bail arises. In addition, she shall also mark her presence in the concerned police station on first Sunday of every month between 10 a.m. to 12 a.m during the pendency of the trial. Any default in attendance in Court and marking her presence in the concerned police station, would result in cancellation of bail granted by this Court thereby entitling the police to take the applicant in custody immediately. It is also directed that the applicant shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. C.c. as per Rules. (Mrs. S.R. Waghmare) Judge moni