• li •,,i'^/' ^^ HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGWH AT BILASPUR W. P.No. 267 of 2001 Petitioner Vipin Kumar Punjabi, aged about 40 yrs, s/o Shri Gurmukh Das Punjabi, occupafion - Advocacy, resklent of Sindhi Colony - Beladula, Raigarh, Tah. Raigarh, Distt, Raigarh (C.G.) Versus- Respondents 1. Distt. Bar Association, Raigarh, Through ifs Secretary, Distl. Bar ^^ocigfion, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh. Mange Ram Agrawal, President, Distt. Bar Association, Raigarh. Raj Kumar Upadhyaya, Secretary, Di^t. Bar Associatioh, Raigarh. Secrstary, State Bar Counctl of M.P. at Jabalpur. 2. 3. 4. WRIT PETITiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bls Shri Safish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Uitam Pandey, Advocate for ihe peUBQner. Shri B. D. Guru, ^tvocate forthe respondente. 1 Thakur ORDER (F^ssed on this 31st day of October, 2007) The membership of the petitioner from the District Bar Association, Raigarh was cancelled pursuant to 8ie resolution dated 25.8.^XX) (Annexure P/1). Being aggrieved ttie petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh at Jabatpur. It appears at the same is still perKflng consideratton. 2. Be that as it may, once tte petifioner has avaited attemative statutory remedy of filing appeal before ttte Bar Council, tftis vntt peStton is not maintainabte for the same relief. The petiConer has already availed altamative remedy and for one relief two forums cannot be invoked. This Court is notinctined to entertain this petition in view of the pendency of the statutoiy appeal before tt»e Bar Council. 3. In view ofttie above, Uiis pefition is dismissed. No oidprasto costs. Sd/- I SatisbK.Agnihotri Judge