1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1849 OF 2004 Tata Sons Ltd. & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.E. P. Bharucha, Senior Counsel with Mr.D. J. Khambata and Mr.R. K. Satpalkar i/b M/s.Mulla & Mulla & C. B. & C. for the Petitioners. Mr.P. M. Mokashi, A.G. P. for Respondent No.1. Ms.Aruna Savla for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 28TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. : The Petitioners are aggrieved by the notice dated 10th June, 2002 issued by the Municipal Corporation by which the lease rent of the premises has been dis-proportionately enhanced according to the Petitioners. We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, we would like 2 the concerned officer to nominate an officer, who would afford hearing to the Petitioners and pass a reasoned order. To facilitate the concerned officer, we would like the Petitioners to file a comprehensive representation within two weeks and that representation would be considered after hearing the Petitioners and Revenue and Forest Department and we expect the concerned officer to pass an order as expeditiously as possible, in any event, within six weeks from the date of filing of the comprehensive representation by the Petitioners. No further directions are necessary in this Writ Petition. This Petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.