IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD WEDENSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.11282 OF 2010 Between:- Satu Srisailam …Petitioner A n d The State of A.P., through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.11282 OF 2010 ORDER: Petitioner/accused and the second respondent-de facto complainant are present. Sri N.V.Anantha Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.V.V.S.R.Subrahmanyam, representing the second respondent-de facto complainant, are present. 2. A joint memo is filed by both parties stating that the matter has been settled out of Court. The second respondent also stated that she has settled the dispute outside the Court and hence, she is no longer interested in prosecuting the case further. 3. As the matter between the parties has been settled amicably out of Court and as the second respondent-de facto complainant is not interested in pursuing the complaint given by her, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the criminal proceedings against the petitioner/accused. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Cr.No.374 of 2010 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, are held liable to be quashed and they are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of as stated above. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 24th November, 2010 Lrkm.