1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Lila Devi & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1140/2006 .............. Date of Order : 14/03/2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. M.C.Bishnoi for the petitioners Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, public prosecutor. BY THE COURT:- This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 28.6.2006 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pali (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) in Criminal Revision No.86/2006 whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners against the order dated 7.3.2006 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) framing charge, was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after framing of charge, some of the prosecution witnesses have been examined. In this view of the matter, no case for interference in 2 the inherent jurisdiction is made out as recording of evidence has started and that part has to be considered and appreciated by the trial court only. The criminal misc. petition is therefore, dismissed. Stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp