2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4034 OF 2009 M/s. Dinesh Agro Products Limited ...Petitioners. v. The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.D.H.Nadkarni with Mr.V.N.Ansurkar i/by M/s.Legal Solutions advs. For the Petitioners. Mr.M.I.Sethna Sr.Counsel with Mr.Rohit B. Pardeshi advs. For the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 18TH JUNE, 2009 P.C. 1 Petitioner is in appeal before the Tribunal. Petitioner applied for exemption from deposit. The Tribunal passed an order of pre-deposit. That order was not challenged before this Court. 2 Petitioner thereafter took out miscellaneous application for modification of that order. That has been rejected against which the present petition. 3 In our opinion, the relief in this petition is for quashing original order dated 14.10.2008 and 20.2.2009. 2 4 There is discretion in the Tribunal while passing the order of pre-deposit. On considering the material on record, the Tribunal exercised its discretion. 5 Ordinarily, this Court would not interfere with this exercise unless a very strong case is made out on behalf of the petitioners. In our opinion, the impugned order cannot be said to be arbitrary or disclosing any error of law on the face of the record or failure to exercise jurisdiction. We are, therefore, not inclined to invoke our extraordinary jurisdiction. 5 Petition stands rejected. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)