acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2008 M/s Adukta And Sons Pvt.Ltd. ... Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare,Sr.counsel a/w Y.A. Sakhare, i/b YKS Legal, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.R. Patil, for Respondent No.1. Ms. Pinky Bhansali, for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. Mr. H.S. Shreepad Mirthy i/b Mr. Ashutosh Sing, for Respondent Nos.7 to 9. ..... CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 28 th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Sakhare, senior counsel appearing for the Petitioners. 2. The Contempt Petition is misconceived and deserves to be dismissed, particularly when the affidavit has been filed wherein a statement has been made by Respondent Nos.7 to 9 that they are always ready and willing to co-operate in execution of such documents of title and Deed of Conveyance in favour of the Petitioners. 3. In the circumstances, the Contempt Petition being not remedy of Petitioners it is dismissed. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)