..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2008 1. Shri Yashwant Bapu Gaikwad, & 2. Smt.Yashodabai Yashwant Gaikwad. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Counsel h/f. G.V.Bhagat, Adv. for applicants. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 28th July, 2008. DATED : 28th July, 2008. DATED : 28th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.I-144 of 2007 of Murbad police station, The said case is under Sections 498-A, 306, 304-B, 506 r/w. 34 of IPC. 3. The applicants are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of deceased Karuna. The applicants had earlier preferred an application for anticipatory bail before this Court. By order dated 5th February, 2008 the said application came ..(2).. to be disposed of by passing following order : "After the application was argued fully and I started dictating the judgment, learned counsel for the applicants prayed for permission to withdraw the application unconditionally. Application disposed of as withdrawn." 4. Now the applicants have approached this Court on the fresh ground that one of the coaccused i.e. brother-in-law of the deceased came to be granted bail by this Court. Hence, on this fresh ground, the applicants are seeking anticipatory bail. It is well settled that considerations of the bail and anticipatory bail are entirely different. The Supreme Court has observed so in the case of State Vs. Anil Sharma State Vs. Anil Sharma State Vs. Anil Sharma reported in 1997 SCC (Cri) 1039 1997 SCC (Cri) 1039 1997 SCC (Cri) 1039. Hence an accused cannot be granted anticipatory bail on the ground that the coaccused was granted bail. 5. On perusal of the FIR of the complainant who is father of the deceased Karuna, it is seen that there are specific allegations against the ..(3).. applicant that they demanded money and that during the marriage she had only got a ring. The complainant has specifically stated that his daughter was harassed and ill-treated by the applicants on account of the said demand. In this view of the matter, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)