W.P. No.9078/2011 19.12.2011 Shri Harshvardhan Pathak, counsel for the petitioner. It is a PIL based upon four news items published in daily newspaper - “Dainik Bhaskar, Indore edition dated 11.10.2011, 6.11.2011, 9.11.2011, and “Naidunia”, Indore edition dated 5.8.2006. It is not disputed that PIL claiming the same relief in W.P. No.8247/2011 is already pending, wherein present petitioner can very well intervene. We do not find any reason to multiply the cases. In view of the aforesaid, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. Same is accordingly dismissed with the said liberty. (S.K. SETH) ( M.C. GARG ) JUDGE. JUDGE. Alok 1