IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.3406 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 4.3.2009 Jeet Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Jaideep Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) The petitioner has assailed order dated 6.2.2009 (Annexure P-2) whereby the Current Duty Charge to the post of Sub Fire Officer earlier given to the petitioner has been taken away. The grouse of the petitioner is that the post is lying vacant and thus, the respondents are not entitled to take away the Current Duty Charge. On specific question being asked by this Court whether any person junior to the petitioner has been given the Charge of higher post of Sub Fire Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly admitted that no junior person has been given the Current Duty Charge. The petitioner has no right to ask for Current Duty Charge for higher post. I do not find any merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 4.3.2009 MFK