IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38578 of 2010 1. BASARAT MIAN 2. Md. Abul Hussain Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant, Mr. Amar Prakash. Petitioner no. 2 is purchaser from real owner, while petitioner no.1 is identifier. There is no doubt that executant of the deed was the real person. If he was not competent to sell his land is of no concern of petitioner no. 1. For petitioner no. 2, it is said that out of the total area of land (22 decimal), only 9 decimal is transferred for which deed exists in favour of the complainant. Fixing of accusation is transferred at its initial stage. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 199C of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., 2 Ist Class, Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)