1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.369 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1717 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.1644 OF 2006 Mayuresh Real Estate Management Pvt.Ltd. .. Appellant Versus Nikko Stock Brokers Pvt.Ltd. And Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.M.Saraogi i/b. Purnima Bhatia for appellant Mr.Thakore with N.A.Rizvi i/b . Thakore Jariwala & Associates for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Mr.G.B.Kedia for respondent No.1. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd March 2010. P.C.: 1] Heard the learned Advocates. The interim order passed on 17th June 2009 in Suit No.1644 of 2006 is challenged in this appeal. 2] We have heard the learned Advocates for parties and we have also perused the impugned order. In our opinion, the learned Single Judge has rightly not granted interim relief in favour of the appellants. We are in 2 agreement with the view expressed by the learned Single Judge. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. 3] The learned Advocate for the appellant makes a request for permitting the appellant to remain in possession of the property in question for some time. This request not being reasonable, we are not inclined to grant the same. Accordingly, this request is also rejected. 4] In view of dismissal of this appeal Notice of Motion No.3200 of 2009 does not survive and is dismissed accordingly. (CHIEF JUSTICE) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)