IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28530 of 2010 1. HARI NANDAN KEWAT, SON OF LATE RAMASHISH KEWAT 2. SHANKAR KEWAT, SON OF LATE RAMASHISH KEWAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the entire case is based on suspicion and there is no eye witness to the occurrence, let the petitioners above named, who have no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Bind P.S. Case No. 12 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on 2 the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)