IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 15847 of 2006 Between: 1 The Union of India, rep. by The Divisionalailway Manager, South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal, Anantapur District A.P. 515801. 2 The Sr. Divisional Operations Manager, South Central Railway, Gu8ntakal Division, Guntakal, Anantapur District, A.P. 515801. 3 The Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, South Central Railway, Guntakal Division, Guntakal, Anantapur District, A.P.- 515801. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Y. Rajanikanth, S/o. Y. Krishnamoorthy, Guntakal, Guntakal Divison, R/o. H.no.13/183 B-1, Vijaya Nagar Colony, S.N. Pet, Guntakal, Anantapur District, A.P. 515801. 2 S.J.R. Shariff, S/o.Sanaullaha Shariff, Karamalopalli, Guntakal Division, R/o. H.No. 3/1209, Co- Operative Colony, kadapa, Kadapa District, A.P.-516001. 3 R. Anandaraju, Guntakal Division, Anantapur Railway Station, Anantapur, A.P. 4 T. Jeevanandam, Guntakal Division, Garaladinne Railway Stationm, Garaladinne, A.P.l 5 A. Subramanyam, Guntakal Divison, Kadapa Railway Station, Kadapa A.P. 6 O.S. Muthuswamy, Guntakal Division, Gooty Railway Station, Gooty, A.P,. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particuarlly one in thenature of Certiorari by calling for the order dt. 10.4.2006 in O.A.No.281/2005 on the ﬁle of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and unconstitutional and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.S.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P. No :15847 of 2006 ORDER: (per GHULAM MOHAMMED, J) Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the subject matter in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.6919 of 2005 and batch dated 29-07-2008 and the writ petition may be disposed of in terms thereof. In the circumstances, this writ petition is allowed for the reasons and in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court dated 29- 07-2008 in Civil Appeal No.6919 of 2005 and batch. No costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J 21st,August,2008. Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK}