1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4587/2010 Snehlata Choudhary vs. State & Ors. Date of order : 9/4/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Sawar Singh for the petitioner. ****** Petitioner Snehlata Choudhary has filed this writ petition challenging order dated 15.3.2010 by which her services were discontinued on Smt. Shailja Nagendra, Lecturer in Social Studies, having joined with respondents on transfer at the place of petitioner's working. Petitioner's services were earlier sought to be discontinued when she filed a petition ; that writ petition was decided and the respondents were directed to consider petitioner's case on priority basis for academic session 2009- 2010. It was left to their discretion to engage petitioner and other similarly situated persons, if they decided to do so, in next academic session. So the contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that her appointment would continue till availability of duly selected candidates or availability of Lecturer on deputation, and respondents cannot discontinue petitioner's services by transferring another Lecturer from a different government college. I am afraid such a contention cannot be countenanced because petitioner's 2 appointment was on contractual basis and respondents have transferred a substantively appointed Lecturer in his place and petitioner will have to make a room for her. Petitioner did not possess the post after duly selection on regular or substantive basis; she was merely engaged on contract purely on temporary basis. I therefore do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that appointment of petitioner was otherwise to subsist till 30th April, 2010 and that she may be given a liberty to make representation to respondents if still some other post is vacant with them. It goes without saying that she may do so. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/