IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 20TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 112 of 2009(C) --------------------- [W.P.(C).No. 16613/2007] REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER(S) -------------------------------- K.V.PADMANABHAN, S/O.VELUTHA,AGED 59 YRS KUNNUTHARA HOUSE(KALLYANI MANDIRAM),KODAMTHURUTHU VILLAGE, EZHUPUNNA SOUTH.P.O AND MURI,CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT(S) -------------------------- 1. THE MANAGER,KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER,DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(REVENUE RECOVERY), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ALAPPUZHA. ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR,SC,KERALA FINANCIAL COR FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No.112/2009 in W.P(C).No.16613 of 2007 ================== Dated this the 9th day of February, 2009 O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioner in the writ petition. The grievance of the petitioner is that at the time of seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition it was omitted to include a prayer for liberty to file a suit. Although I am not quite satisfied with the conduct of the petitioner, I dispose of the review petition with a direction that the disposal of the writ petition would be without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file a suit in respect of any matters involved in the writ petition. However, I make it clear that this would be subject to the right of the KFC to raise contentions regarding limitation and maintainability of the suit. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge