1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 256/1999 (Pradip Babarao Khamankar Vs. Gramin Vikas Sanstha & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 13, 2008. Heard Mr. Shrikant Saoji for the petitioner and Mr. Thakare, the learned A.G.P. for respondent no.3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that vide interim order dated 18th April, 2001, this Court had directed the Education Officer to re-examine the case of the petitioner afresh and consider the eligibility of the petitioner for grant of approval. It was also made clear in the order that for the period the Education Officer cannot grant approval, it will be the sole responsibility of the respondent/management to pay the salary of the petitioner. Mr. Thakare, the learned Government pleader, has submitted that pursuant to the said order, case of 2 the petitioner was considered afresh by the Education Officer for grant of approval and the Education Officer has passed an order dated 12/10/2001 whereby the approval is granted to the petitioner for academic session 1999-2000 and onwards, and the Management will be responsible to pay the salary to the petitioner for the remaining period during which the petitioner has factually discharged his duties as Assistant Teacher. In the backdrop of the above referred fact, it is evident that the case of the petitioner has been reconsidered by the Education Officer in view of the interim order and the approval is also granted accordingly. The responsibility of payment of salary for the period for which approval is not granted, is already fixed on the Management. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. JUDGE JUDGE RMP