IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33604 of 2009 ASHA DEVI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.7.2010. Heard. The need of the petitioners for filing the present petition is that they have been directed to be charged for having committed the offences under Section 304B, etc IPC. I hold a view that for quashing an order of framing charges or not discharging an accused, the proper forum could be the revisional forum of the court. But, considering that the matter is urgent as the trial could be proceeding only on the basis of charges, I have decided to entertain the present petition. I may further point out that “sufficient ground for proceeding”, which appears in Sections, 203, 204, 227 and 228 Cr.P.C., could be the guiding factor for framing of charges, which has regularly been considered right from Chandra Deo Singh Vrs. Prakash Chandra Bose @ Chabi Bose & Anr. AIR 1963 SC 1430 and adopted by the Supreme Court in its other decision exactly on the point as has been raised before me in the case of Prof. Ramesh Singh Vrs. State of Bihar - 2 - AIR 1977 SC 2018. Supreme Court speaking through Untwalia,J pointed out that even a grave doubt that the accused had committed the offence could be sufficient for framing the charges. The impugned order discusses the materials in detail and thereafter reached the conclusion that the charges have to be framed. Considering the above aspect of the matter, the court does not find any merit in the petition and the same is hereby dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )