IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5263 of 2010 1. KUNAL KUMAR son of Sri Karu @ Vishwanath Singh & 2. Rakesh Kumar son of Late Shashi Bhushan Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 31.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that four accused persons waylaid the truck of the informant and while two persons fled away with the truck, two persons fled away on the motor cycle on which they had come. In course of search, the motor cycles were found but the accused persons fled away. On enquiry, it was found that the petitioners were the owners of the said motor cycles and, therefore, normal inference would be that the petitioners were also involved in the present occurrence. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)