IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45794 of 2009 RAMANAND RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 24.02.2010 Heard both sides. Mr. Dhirendra Kumar states before this Court that in terms of the order of this Court dated 23.07.2009, charges have not been framed against the petitioner. He asserts that till today charges have not been framed. This Court finds that earlier his prayer for bail was considered and rejected by order dated 23.07.2009, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22467 of 2009. Petitioner was, however, granted liberty to renew prayer for bail if within four months from the date of receipt/communication of the said order charges are not framed against him. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State is not in a position to refute this position. He, however, submits that Court below shall verify the aforesaid stand/statement of the learned counsel. Let the aforesaid statement be verified, and if charges have not been framed within four months from the date of receipt/communication of the order dated 23.07.2009, the Court below shall release the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case no. 96 of 2003, subject to the following conditions: 2 (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person before the Court below on each date fixed at the trial after the charges are framed. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, it shall be open to the trial Court to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)