IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1929 WA.No. 410 of 2008 -------------------- ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21356/2006 Dated 29/09/2006 ) APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WPC ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SHRI BENNY GIRVASIS RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 4 TO 8 IN WPC --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PRAVEEN. A., SAIYUJYAM, THRIKKANDIYUR POST, THIRURU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES MAHATMA GANDHI MARG (RING ROAD), ANSARI NAGAR NEW DELHI-110 029. 3. DR.JOHN JOSEPH.K., 11 B, KAILAS NAGAR KESAVADASAMPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DR.LEENA. L.K., LEENA VILLA, KARIYAUR, SREEKARYAM POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. DR.HASEENA HASSAN, TC XI/684 (III) NALANDA JUNCTION, NANTHANCODE P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. DR.RESHMI.M., RESHMI BHAVAN S.N.PURAM, PAVITHRESWARAM P.O., PUTHUR KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SHRI ELVIN PETER BY ADV. SHRI MILLU DANDAPANI. BY ADV. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ. ................................................................................... W.A. No. 410 OF 2008 ................................................................................... Dated this the 25th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T K. Balakrishnan Nair, J: When the Writ Appeal was taken up for admission, it is submitted by the Government Pleader that the first respondent herein, who was the writ petitioner, was admitted for the course applied for by him, without disturbing others who were already admitted. In view of the said development, we feel that it is unnecessary to decide the appeal on merits. The contentions raised by the appellants against the judgment under appeal are kept open. The admission of the first respondent shall be treated as regular. The Writ Appeal is disposed of as above. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk