IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.13795 of 2011 Date of Decision:2.8.2011 Dharampal Yadav and others .... Petitioners Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents No.1 to 3 to promote the petitioners on the post of Assistant in the department from the date i.e. 29.3.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are entitled for promotion to the posts of Assistant in the department from the date i.e. 29.3.2011 when their juniors were promoted. Accordingly, they made representation (P-11) to respondent No.2 in this regard. However, till date no reply has been received and conveyed to the petitioners. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the appropriate authority to decide the representation (P-11) as expeditiously as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. 2.8.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE