1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R 1. Nanu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan S.B.CR.MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.2740/2007 2. Mangu Singh vs. State of Rajasthan S.B.CR.MISC. BAIL APPL. NO.2973/2007 3. Satya Narain vs. State of Rajasthan S.B.CR.MISC. BAIL APPL. NO.2669/2007 DATE OF ORDER :: July 10, 2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.M.K.Garg, ] Mr.Vineet Jain ] for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. BY THE COURT: These three bail applications involve common question of law and facts and arise out of one and same FIR. 2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. There are serious allegations against the petitioners and others that they by forging certain documents, wanted to take the electric connection for the tube wells under the quota of war widow. There is prima facie evidence that in the particular village so far there had not been any martyr. The electric connection for tube wells is being released in favour of war widows by Discom on priority but in order to grab the connection, the petitioners and others forged the documents and got the connection in as many as 13 cases under the category “War Widows” by manipulation and forging of certain documents depriving the real claimants. In the circumstances, therefore, in such cases, a custodial interrogation is necessary. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in my view it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The bail applications filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. are, therefore, dismissed. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-