1 cp262.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.262 OF 2010 Brig.Asil Singh (Retd.) & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. Inder Mohan Dugal & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/b Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for the petitioners Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE :DECEMBER 20,2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The breach alleged is of clause (i) of the operative part of the Judgment and Order dated 4 th April 2008 passed by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioners has invited the attention of the Court to the averments made in paragraph 3 of the petition. He submits that clause (i) of paragraph 7 of the order of this Court will have to be read with the paragraph 11 of the affidavit of the Municipal Corporation which is reproduced in paragraph 5 of the order of this Court. On plain reading of paragraph 5 of the order of this Court, the assertions made in paragraph 3 of the petition will not constitute breach of the said clause (i). The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will seek clarification from the concerned Court as regards the order dated 4 th April 2008. That remedy is always open to the petitioners. 2 Suffice it to say that as of today no case is made out for initiating action under the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. Petition is disposed of. All contentions on merits are kept open. JUDGE