THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 12847 OF 2008 O R D E R: The 1st respondent University published a notice dated 12.6.2008, indicating that interviews would be conducted on 22.6.2008 at 11 A.M., to select the candidates for the posts of Lecturers in Mathematics, Statistics, English, Sociology, Economics, Politics, Management and Commerce, on contractual basis. The grievance of the petitioners is that the notification is very vague and bereft of particulars. They submit that the notification is silent, as to whether the rules of reservation would be followed, and if so, the roster points against each vacancy. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. It is debatable as to whether the rules of reservation would apply to contractual appointments also. Be that as it may, though the notification is silent, on this aspect, the record placed by the learned Standing Counsel discloses that rules of reservation were implemented. Obviously, on account of short tenure, the respondents did not indicate the respective roster points, against each vacancy. Publication of such particulars would enable the candidates of the respective categories to apply. A vague and uncertain notification, as the one, challenged in this writ petition, would not attract the candidates of requisite merit. Inasmuch as the selections, in pursuance of the notification, have already taken place, this court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. It is, however, directed that in future, the 1st respondent shall issue notifications containing details of reservation as well as roster points, against each and every vacancy. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ 24th June 2008 PAN