1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2011. (Shrikant Damodhar Mate Vs. The Education Officer (Sec.), Z.P., Bhandara and others) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Shri P.N. Shende, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri T.R. Kankale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri M. Turankar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 &3. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 2011. Shri Shende Adv. for the petitioner states that as there is dispute about Management, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not in a position to provide the employment on compassionate basis to the petitioner who happens to be the son of deceased employee. Shri Turankar Adv. for respondent No.2 states that because of internal dispute appropriate decision in this respect could not be taken. Learned AGP for respondent No.1 states that it is basically the duty of respondent Nos.2 and 3 and respondent No.1 comes into picture after the proposal for approval is received. The guidelines specifically permit respondent No.1 to interfere, if he finds that claim is 2 being ignored. Here because of dispute inter se between Management and the petitioner, the entitlement of petitioner has not been considered so far. Hence, we direct respondent No.1 to hear both factions in the Management and to take appropriate decision about eligibility and entitlement of petitioner as early as possible and in any case within period of eight weeks from today. We direct petitioner, respondent Nos.2 and 3 to appear before respondent No.1 on 05.12.2011 and to abide by his instructions in the matter. The petitioner as also respondent No.2 shall communicate orders of this Court to the other fraction in the Management also. With this direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE NSN