CWP No.1153 of 2008.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.1153 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.01.2010 **** Amrit Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Ms. Monika Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab Mr. N.S. Waraich, Advocate for respondent No.5 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner impugns selection and consequential appointment of Ramandeep Kaur – respondent No.5 as Anganwadi Worker of Abdullapur, District Fatehgarh Sahib. (2). Upon notice the respondents have come up with the plea that the said post was duly circulated by the Gram Panchayat but the petitioner did not apply. This fact appears to be undisputed. It is also pointed out that respondent No.5 is a Graduate as compared to the petitioner who is CWP No.1153 of 2008.doc - 2 – Matriculate only. There is no other mitigating circumstance in favour of anyone of them. (3). In view of the fact that the petitioner did not apply and compete with respondent No.5, she does not have any locus standi to question the selection or appointment of respondent No.5. (4). Dismissed. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 22.01.2010 vishal shonkar