IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2011 / 22ND ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 884 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8247/2011 Dated 31/03/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- DINESHAN PUTHALATH, S/O. KUNHIRAMAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS, MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTOR, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ---------------------------------- 1. DR.K. ELLANGOVAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND CONVENER, THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE (HIGHER) TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. 2. T.P. SENKUMAR, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, TRIVANDRUM -695 001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN FOR R1&2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SU CONT.COURT CASE (C)NO.884/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22/1/2011. ANNEXURE B: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29/12/2010 FILED BEFORE THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER BY THE PETITIONER. ANNEXURE C: COPY OF THE SELECT LIST NOTIFIED ON 21/3/2011 AND PUBLISHED IN KERALA GAZETTE DATED 22/3/2011. ANNEXURE D: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31ST MARCH 2011 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ANNEXURE E: COPY OF THE REVISED SELECT LIST PUBLISHED IN KERALA GAZETTE DATED 25/7/2011. ANNEXURE F: COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 20/8/2011 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE R1(A): COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE ADHOC DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE MEETING (HIGHER) HELD ON 25/8/2011. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SU S.SIRI JAGAN, J ------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No.884 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pursuant to Annexure D judgment orders have been passed in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- S.SIRI JAGAN JUDGE ab