IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7411 of 2000 JANARDAN PRASAD & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 19.08.2008 Learned Counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that he presses this writ application only with regard to petitioner no. 9 and that he has no instruction in so far as petitioners 1 to 8 and 10 to 12 are concerned. The writ application is therefore dismissed as not pressed with regard to the petitioners except petitioner no. 9. The grievance in the writ application was for quashing of the gradation list dated 31.12.1999 of the employees of the Revenue Department for the purpose of promotion to the post of Circle inspector cum Kanungoh. Learned Counsel submits that in the year 2008 a fresh gradation list has been prepared in which the petitioner has been shown at serial 45 and with regard to which the petitioner has no grievance. However the petitioner has filed a representation with regard to certain entries in the gradation list of dates in context of the person at serial 16 of the gradation list. Nothing survives for adjudication on merits in this writ application and it is disposed off accordingly in terms of the submission made on behalf of petitioner no. 9. If the petitioner has filed any representation in respect of any other matter naturally the respondents are required to consider the same and dispose it of in accordance with law. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)