HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RTI ASPUR WrH Pzfifion Na. 179 of 2002 P21'i'rianer Rnjkumarv Verma, 5h Lufe Shhi Karrik Ram Verma, residen'r ef’ Mukam Pas-t Tundri via Biluigarh, Districf Raipur (Chharrisgarh) Versus 1. 51312 of Chha‘H'isgnv'h ‘H'wough fine Responden‘rs Secremry, Department of School Educa-rién, D.K.5. Building, Raipur (Chhafl’isgarh) Direcfor, > Public Insfruc‘rions, CHm-H’isgnrh, Raipur (Chha'rl'isgarh) 3. Disfrict Educatin Dficer, air (Chuftisgnrh) Janpnd Panchayaf Bihignrh fhragh its hief Executive Officer a? Biinigm'h Dish-id, Rnipr (Chat‘risgarh) Block Education Oficer, Bilaigurh, Dis-'ic'i Raipur (Chhnfi-isgr) WRIT PEYITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , h ih J Single 3ench : Han'hle Mri safis K. Agnotri, . D Ad for 5hri B. . 6uru, voome ihe pe’riiioner. 5ri Vctd'a'i' Singh Thakur, e'ry dvam'i’e eriei far ‘he respondents N0. 1 to . md . (Pessd on this 8’“ day of Juiy, 2008) 1. red caunsel appearing far the petitianer, an instructinn, smits ha with he penge af time this petitan has ame infructuous. 2. Learned cannsei appearing for the respandents/5tate has no abjectian. In View af the abave, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, having became infrjjctuaus. Consequently, the interim direction stands discharged. Na casts. Sdl- Sau'sh K. Agnihouiir , i Judge WV o f Rpu h , u C u h f lr ah h iwn Dpu A Em t 3 5 ORAL ORDER e i Pim ub tt t ne i bec