1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL RESTORATION No. 46 of 2006 SMT. BHAGWATI DEVI & ORS V/S SURESH DAN & ORS Mr. RAJESH JOSHI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 15.9.2006 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the application. The appeal was dismissed in default as nobody appeared even in the second round till 11 A.M. during morning hours of the Court working. The only reason given is that non appearance of the counsel occasioned bonafidely as initially the appellant was represented by Mr. Kamal Dave, and subsequently the case was assigned to the present counsel Shri Joshi. It is then contended that the appearance could not be put in as the name of the present counsel did not appear in the cause list. I find from the file of the main appeal that no 2 Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of Mr. Joshi. Obviously, therefore, there was no occasion for his name appearing in the cause list. Thus, the cause pleaded, in my view, does not make out any sufficient cause for restoration. The restoration application is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/