1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6294 OF 2005 Arjun Bhivsan Ahire ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.R.K.Mendadkar with Ms.H.K.Mandlik for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for the State. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & F.I.REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. JJ. JJ. 23rd September, 2005. P.C. : 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The prescribed form for issuing the certificate is in terms of Form "G". The committee after validating the Petitioner’s caste claim has chosen to issue a certificate of validity dated 6th March, 2003 which is not in conformity with the 2 rules. 3. We fail to understand how the committee, which is a Tribunal subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court, fails to follow the procedure and issue the certificate in terms of Form "G". We direct the committee that on the committee coming to the conclusion that the Petitioner is entitled for the caste validity certificate, the certificate must be issued in terms of Form "G". The Respondent Committee is directed, on a copy of this order being served upon them, to issue the certificate in terms of Form "G" within a period of two weeks. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to cost. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)