IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4365 of 2010 1. SURENDRA MAHTO son of Ramjit Mahto & 2. Satnarayan Sah S/o Ramdeo Sah Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 47-A of the Excise Act When the matter was heard on 18.2.2010, this court felt that the petitioners should remain in custody till 18th May, 2010, in view of the fact that the petitioners were accused in similar matter. In view of such, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, in connection with, Ramgarhawa P.S. case no.153 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)