WP(C) 4045/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. A.K. Purkayastha, the learned counsel for the petitioner as we ll as Mr. Soren, the learned State counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is basically against the non-registratio n of the first information report, which, according to the petitioner, was lodge d on 06.05.2010 in Morikolong Police Outpost under Nagaon Police Station. Accord ing to the petitioner though such first information report was lodged, the same has not been registered. It is also the case of the petitioner that he thereafte r though approached the Superintendent of Police, no action has been taken. On the basis of such allegation, this Court vide order dated 23.07.2010 had directed the learned State counsel to obtain necessary instruction. Mr. Soren, the learned State counsel on the basis of the written instruc tion dated 28.07.2010 from the Superintendent of Police, Nagaon, copy of which h as been placed on record, has submitted that neither the Morikolong Police Outpo st nor the Superintendent of Police has received any written information from th e petitioner and if such formal F.I.R. is received, the case will be registered and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law. In the said written instruction, it has also been mentioned that on the basis of the averments made in the writ petition, the Officer-In-Charge of Nagaon Police Station has been a sked to inquire into the matter and take action for maintenance of public peace and order. Mr. Purkayastha, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact, the Officer-In-Charge has visited the place in this connection. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the petitioner may approach the Officer-In-Charge of Nagaon Pol ice Station with a formal F.I.R., on the basis of which the Officer-In-Charge sh all take appropriate action in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.