IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35740 of 2009 JAY CHAND YADAV @ JHAGRU YADAV @ JHAGRU, S/o Deo Narain Yadav, R/o village Mathar Diarum, P.S. Khagaria, District Khagaria …. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……… Opp. Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr.Abul Kalam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ----- 3 4.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the first information report and his name has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Heeralal Swarankar @ Heera Lal Soni who was arrested by the police along with looted motorcycle. He had already been granted bail vide Annexure 2 by a Bench of this Court. It is submitted that the petitioner was remanded in this case on 28.6.2008 as he was already arrested 3.6.2008 in connection with Ballia 2 P.S. Case no. 51 of 2008. However, in the order passed by learned Sessions Judge rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner is in custody since 9.7.2009. Learned counsel for the State submit that looted mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However, the co- accused Heera Lal Soni who has named the petitioner has been granted bail. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, JAY CHAND YADAV @ JHAGRU YADAV @ JHAGRU, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 81 of 2006 with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner and he should 3 state on affidavit giving full genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. It is further directed that after the release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in a criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)