1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4090 OF 2011 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 13.06.2011. 1. Heard. 2. No Confidence motion was moved against the petitioner and the same was passed on 8.3.2011. The petitioner challenged the said No Confidence Motion before the Additional Collector, Hingoli. The said appeal was dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, who also dismissed the appeal and confirmed the finding of the Additional Collector. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. 2 3. Mr.Palodkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice of No Confidence Motion was not served upon him and even the No Confidence Motion was held in the School building and not in the office of the Gram Panchayat. The Respondents did not have any authority to convene such a meeting at the place other than the place of Gram Panchayat. This aspect has not been considered by the authorities while dealing with the appeal. The Respondents could not point out that they have authority to convene No Confidence Motion at a different place than the office of Gram Panchayat. 4. Mrs.Ladda, learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader supports the order and states that no prejudice has been caused to the petitioner. The place of meeting was made known to the petitioner who was present personally in the meeting. 5. Perusal of the proceedings show that No Confidence Motion has been passed against the petitioner by six members out of seven. This shows that the petitioner does not enjoy confidence of all the members. Both the 3 authorities have concurrently held that petitioner was personally present in the meeting. In light of that, the petitioner can not make a grievance about holding the meeting at a place different than the Gram Panchayat Office. No prejudice has been shown to have caused to the petitioner by holding the meeting in the Gram Panchayat office. 6. In light of above, no fault can be found in the judgments delivered by the authorities. As such the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.13.06.2011. asp/office/wp4090.11 4