IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.76 of 2010 NILU KUMARI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, D/O RAM RANJAN SINGH, W/O SRI GAURI SHANKAR @ BIPIN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-CHIRRAIYA, P.S.- WARSALIGANJ, DISTRICT-NAWADA, AT PRESENT POSTED AND WORKING ON THE POST OF LOK SHIKSHIKA MAHEDEV BIGHA CENTRE UNDER THE GRAM PANCHAYAT THERE, BLOCK-WARSALIGANJ, DISTRICT- NAWADA. ........PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DIRECTOR JAN SHIKSHA, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-COLLECTOR, NAWADA. 4. DISTRICT JAN SHIKSHA OFFICER, NAWADA. 5. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT THERA, WARSALIGANJ, NAWADA. 6. PANCHAYAT SEVAK-CUM-SECRETARY, THERA GRAM PANCHAYAT, WARSALIGANJ, NAWADA. ..........RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 22.06.2011 This review application has been filed for review and recall of the order dated 10.03.2010 passed in CWJC No.7623 of 2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by the said order the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority constituted under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008). He submits that the petitioner had filed an appeal, but the appeal has been rejected by the Appellate Authority by order dated 2 25.03.2010, as contained in Annexure-2, on the ground that the petitioner’s services did not come within its jurisdiction in terms of the Rules. He submits that the petitioner was appointed as Instructor in a Lok Shikshika Kendra in the district of Nawada and she has worked as such from 22.08.2003 to 31.08.2006 as per the certificate of the Mukhiya annexed as Annexure-3. He submits that the District Jan Shiksha Officer, Nawada had already released the amount of the honorarium to be paid to the petitioner, but the Mukhiya has not disbursed the same to the petitioner. If that is so, the petitioner is at liberty to file a representation with regard to non-disbursement of the amount to her before the respondent no.3, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nawada. If such a representation is filed the same shall be considered and dispose of in accordance with law. The civil review application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)