wp3850-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3850 OF 2011 Damji K. Shah and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Shree Vile Parle Gujarathi Mandal CHS Ltd. And Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Veena Shantilal Parekh – Petitioner No.3 in person and for other petitioners None for respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8th July 2011. P.C.: 1] Heard the petitioners who are represented by petitioner No.3, who is power of attorney holder of all petitioners. Since the parties are appearing in person, I have carefully perused the orders of courts below at an interlocutory stage. The Courts below have not committed any error of law or perversity while rendering tentative and prima facie finding that the resolution from 2005 till 2008 are under challenge and no interim injunction can be granted restraining their implementation, particularly when the case of the society is that the resolutions have been passed at General Body Meetings wp3850-11.doc 2 and by majority. Prima facie, until and unless the acts of the society are demonstrated and proved to be vitiated in the manner set out in the dispute application, it will not be proper to grant any interim relief. 2] In these circumstances, the tentative and prima facie view of the Courts below does not require any interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is dismissed. The trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of dispute and endeavour to dispose it off as expeditiously as possible and within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The trial court shall not be influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned orders. Petition disposed of. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)