mGHCOURTapCHHATnSQAiai^BII.ASffliR W.P. W9»o.8848/2007 PBTI'nOMER K.RanaL Murti Kishtaya a/o Late Shri K. Kishtaya a^ed about 32 years, Resident ofViBage Bhatpali, Tahsfl Bhopal Rattiiam District Daatewada(CG9 VersiM RESPONDBMTS 1. State of Chhatdsgarti, Tluough the Secretaiy, Revcnuc Dcpartmcnt, Mantralajr, Bhawaa, Raipur, (ChhattisgaA) DKS 2. The CommissiQner, Revcnue Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) 3. Thc CoUcctor Bastar at Jagdalinn-, District Bastar(CG) 4: Tabsildar, Narayanpur, District Bastar(C(^ WjUIT nETITIOM ONDER AKnCLB !^6 Oi? ntE CCTiannTUKMI WIMDIA Appearances Shri Rakesh Anthony, Connsel for the petitioncr. Ms. Suruta Jain, PaKel Lawyer for tlie State oa advance copy. ORfliLOKDER (4.10.2007) SOTIIL KUMAR SIgHA^J. Heard finaUy with the consent ofthe parties, Leamed counsel for the petitioner atyics that thc father of the petitioner, who was working as a Peon in Revenuc Departinent under responde.nt No.4 in Narayanpur, District Bastar, has cxpired on 28. 12.1998. Thereafter, the pctitioner made an application for coiapassionate appointnicnt, but tais case was not considered. He rcfers to thc memo datcd 4.4.2W)1, issued by thc Cy, CoUector on bchalf of Collector, Dantcwada that suice the father of t~hc petttioner was working in Tahsil Office, Narayanpur, the application should be filed before the Tahsildar, Narayanpur. Hc aiyies that thcreafter, tte petitioner filed an appUcation befoTe the Tahsfldar, NarEyanpur, but no decision has been taken on the said applicatioa till date. He <5 W.P.(S)No.5848/2007 makes a Unuted prayer that this petition may be disposcd ofwith a directk>n to respondcnts No. 3 &. 4 to consnjer esnd dispose of the application of the petitioDer ffled for coinpassionatc appointincnt on thc ground of death of his father, whfch is pending before respondcnt No.4. Tbis limited praycr is not oppused by leamcd couasel fbr the State. Ttac sanie is aUowed. It is dircctcd that if so advised, the petitioncr may fflc appUcations along with a copy of this oider and a cojy of writ petition befone rcspondents No. 3 & 4, makmg praycr for disposal crf his pending appUcation for coinpassionatc appointment aad if such applications are filed beforc thcm and the application for coinpassfonate appointinent ffled by the petitioncr is stfll pendtag before them, they shaB dispose of the said appBcation in. accordancc with law and shaB coimmumcate thc result ot thE same to the petitioner at the ^rliest. With the above obserwations, this pctition stands fiiialty disposed of. _^—- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge <^ ^ sunita