1 ^g-^ XI-HC—78 ^F *ll*1Cfll ^»W^» T^r ^ii^Krt^ ^ti1<H^<o, f^<yii<y^< .^£1Q..U.5.U^...............^ 2009 3TT^T ^T f<^i<=b 'TOT ^TT^T^TRNt' ^rH^T 'q^F ( ^f^^) '^nw ^rfgTT ^n^r Single Bench; Hon'ble w.p.rci N Petitioner Respondent 26.3.2009 Rajkumar, Gr)Mt<n<^i "^W^Tf ^ fe^t <P»i^i< ^3tf?R3^5T Justice Dhirendra Mishra o.1251/2009 (Petition under Article 2(6 of Constitution of India) ^/o Late Variyal Das Chainani, Vs Aged 52 ye^rs, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil & Districf R^ijpur (C.G.) Nagar P^lik Nigam, Raipur, Through Commissioi|ier, Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur Mr. Sanjay Shyam Agarwal, ^] By the instant petition under the petitioner is praying for direc^ \dvocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay K Agarwal, Adv<j)cate with Mr. K. Shakeel, Advocate for the respondent. Heard. Mcle 226 ofthe Constitution of India jon to the respondent authorities to extend benefit asper their own lettejr dated 1.2.2009 (Annexure P-4). Learned counsel for the peti joners submits that this petition may be disposed of in terms 6f the ob^ervations & directions given by this Court in W.P. (c) No. 1118/2009 (J<| Nigam, Raipur) decided on 26.3.20(] Learned counsel for the rei objection ifthe instant petition is dis| In view ofabove, the instantl order dated 26.3.2009 passed by (Jagdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Pj Certified copy as per rules. igdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Palik 19. ipondent submits that they have no Dosed of in the aforesaid terms. petition is disposed of in terms of the :his Court in W.P, (c) No.1118/2009 alik Nigam, Raipur). ___ Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge x