IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 868 OF 1989 The State of Maharashtra .. Appellant versus Kadappa Shrishil Kalgar & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. None for the respondent. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J DATED : 16th September 2004. ORAL JUDGEMENT :- ORAL JUDGEMENT :- ORAL JUDGEMENT :- 1. Heard the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The trial Court acquitted the respondent accused who was charged under the provisions of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The trial Court observed that the mandatory provisions of section 20(1) of the said Act was not followed. The trial Court has observed that the order of sanction is vague and no particulars have been mentioned in the said charge. 3. I have gone through the said order of sanction as also the judgement and order of the trial Court. There is no infirmity in the said order. 4. Appeal is dismissed. V.M. KANADE, J