IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2090 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 05, 2011 Om Parkash ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. FIR under Section 306 IPC was registered against the petitioner in the year 1995. In 1997, the petitioner was convicted and awarded a sentence of five years. The petitioner filed an appeal against the same and was acquitted in the year 2008. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed a representation for permitting him to join back in service as he was placed under suspension. The petitioner avers that his services were never terminated and he is still being paid 50% of the subsistence allowance. The petitioner has approached this court for seeking direction for the respondents to consider and decide his representation. Without going into the merits of the controversy, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. It is made clear that these directions have been issued only on the basis of averment made in the writ petition that the petitioner has not been terminated and is under suspension. September 05, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE