1 ca 8322.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8322 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 219 OF 1990 Lilabai d/o Dagadu Chaudhari .. Applicant Versus 1. Maruti Raoji Choudhari-died-L.R.s 1-A Kisan Maruti Choudhari and others .. Respondents Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri R. D. Bhalerao, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 9. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 01ST APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : . The present civil application is filed for restoration of the second appeal which is dismissed in default for not taking steps. Shri Shelke, learned counsel for the applicant has filed a pursis intimating that the respondent No. 1-G was one of the legal representative of deceased respondent No. 1. The other legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 1 are already on record. So, it is not necessary to bring her legal representatives 2 ca 8322.10 on record. The said pursis is accepted at the risk of the appellant and same is marked as "X" for identification. 2. It is also submitted by the learned counsel that the legal representatives of respondent No. 1-H are already on record and the pursis to that effect is filed along with the civil application. The same is accepted. In the light of that, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "A" and "B". The civil application disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/April 11