IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.10311-M of 2010 Date of Decision:25.5.2010 Uttam .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Virk, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.170 dated 1.6.2009 registered under Sections 302,323,148,149,324,307 of IPC and Section 25/54/59 Arms Act at Police Station Hodal District Faridabad. It is not disputed that injury attributed to the present petitioner on the deceased does not find figure in the medical report. The other injury attributed to the petitioner is to Om Parkash-complainant. The said injury is also stated to be simple in nature. Further, there are seven accused in the FIR. The present petitioner has been named in the FIR alongwith his father, his real brother, his real uncle and sons of his uncle. It appears that entire family has been enroped for having caused three injuries to the deceased. Out of these three injuries, injury No.2 is lacerated wound on the wrist. Injury No.3 is abrasion on right forearm. However, as per the post mortem report, cause of death is on account of injury No.1, which is admittedly attributed to the co-accused Harshi and not to the present petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 7.6.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad. 25.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE