IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23218 of 2010 PRATYUSH KUMAR SON OF MINENDRA KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 3.9.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner under suspicious circumstances killed his wife Rubi Sinha. During investigation it transpired that the deceased was in fact a married Muslim girl, who was living together with the petitioner as spouse but some differences arose between them on the point of marriage, due to which this occurrence took place. Considering that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and apart from confessional statement of the co- accused there is no material against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 16.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patna in Gandhi Maidan P.S.case No.8 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and - 2 - delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )