IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 804 of 2006 Raj Pal S/o Sri Mange Ram, R/o 4649 / 113-A, New Modern Sahadra, New Delhi-32. ……… Applicant Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand. 2. Smt. Rasmi W/o Aman Panchal, D/o Sri Ram Lal. 3. Ram Lal S/o Sri Jai Singh, Both 2 & 3 R/o 527 Awas Vikas Colony, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. …….. Respondents Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner / applicant. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Prabha Noliyal, Advocate for respondents Nos. 2 & 3. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I feel that respondent No. 3 might have been misled into believing that the petition was filed in the High Court based upon the communication received by him from his lawyer at Rishikesh. The learned court below has taken a pragmatic view in not proceeding against respondent No. 3. No interference is called for. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 31.03.2008 G