IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19942 of 2010 MUNNA SINGH @ MUKESH SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Alamnagar (Ratwara) P.S. No. 69 of 2008 for offences punishable under Sections 365, 366A, 323, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner along with his brothers have been charged with kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegation is directed against the brother of the petitioner namely, Ravindra Singh, who has been charged with kidnapping the victim girl for purpose of marriage. The girl was recovered by the police and who has also given her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which she had initially named the petitioner along with Ravindra Singh as having taken the victim girl to their house. Learned counsel submits that 2 subsequently in course of deposition in the trial the victim girl has named Ravindra Singh exclusively as the person who had taken her away for purpose of marriage. He further with reference to the deposition of the informant i.e. father of the girl namely, Kailash Singh submits that the entire allegation is directed towards Ravindra Singh and there is nothing against the present petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the case is under trial. Having regard to the circumstances aforesaid, let the petitioner namely, Munna Singh @ Mukesh Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Alamnagar (Ratwara) P.S. case No. 69 of 2008 subject to the condition that the petitioner would accept the police papers without committing any delay and be present in the Court concerned on each and every date fixed in the case and failure on his part to attend the Court on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the 3 satisfaction of the Court below would confer liberty to the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bond and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)