IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15042 of 2010 1. CHANDRALATA DEVI W/O MANOJ KUMAR R/O VILL.- CHATURBHUJ PIPRAHI, P.S.- LAUKHA, BLOCK- KHUTAUNA, DISTT.- MADHUBANI-- ---------------------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHUBANI 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KHUTAUNA, MADHUBANI 6. THE PANCHAYAT SHIKSHAK SELECTION COMMITTEE THROUGH CHAIRMAN - CUM - MUKHIYA CHATURBHUJ PIPRAHI GRAM PANCHAYAT, LAUKHA, MADHUBANI 7. THE MUKHIYA, CHATURBHUJ PIPRAHI GRAM PANCHAYAT, KHUTAUNA, MADHUBANI 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY CUM PANCHAYAT SEVAK CHATURBHUJ PIPRAHI GRAM PANCHAYAT, KHUTAUNA, MADHUBANI 9. THE HEADMASTER, NEW PRIMARY SCHOOL, LALJI SAHU TOL CHATURBHUJ PIPRAHI, P.S.- LAUKHA, BLOCK- KHUTAUNA, DISTT.- MADHUBANI------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 27.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only reason why the Court does not want to entertain this writ application at this stage because the petitioner has remedy under law in the sense that there is a forum created for looking of such dispute which is the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority and petitioner should knock the door of the appellate authority. If the petitioner does not get proper relief the High Court’s doors are open for him. If the petitioner moves the concerned appellate authority, they, after hearing all the persons involved, will try to render its opinion at the earliest. This writ application is disposed of with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)