IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revn. No.14 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 20.04.2011 Sunita and another ...Petitioners Versus Daya Nand Behminia ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 26.10.2010 whereby the maintenance at the rate of 5,000/- per month in favour of petitioner No. 1 and Rs.4,000/- in favour of petitioner No. 2, has been granted by the District Judge (Family Court), Bhiwani. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the fact that the respondent-husband is a manager in UCO Bank and is getting salary of Rs.30,000/- to 35,000/- per month. However, the gross salary of the respondent- husband has been shown to be Rs.29,503/- per month. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the order dated 26.10.2010 passed by the District Judge (Family Court), Bhiwani. does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed. April 20, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE