CRM-M No. 28406 of 2011 **** Om Parkash alias Kala v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. M.K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG, Punjab. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.127 dated 18.07.2011, under Sections 406,420, 465. 467, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Kotwali Nabha, District Patiala. On 19.09.2011 the following contention was noticed:_ “ Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated only because of a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the petitioner against the complainant in which notice has been issued otherwise petitioner is neither a signatory nor a beneficiary in any manner nor he has any connection with the other accused.” Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Jagga Ram, has accepted the factual assertion that the petitioner is neither a signatory nor a beneficiary but has stated that the investigating officer has no knowledge about the filing of any complaint by the petitioner against the complainant. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 07.10.2011 between 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. and on any other date on which his presence is required by him. The investigating officer shall release him on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE September 27, 2011 sunita