f^". ih-..; x^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAfW. BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P.(S) No. 3674/ 2008 Smt. Sushila Sahu, W/o late T.R. Sahu, Aged about 60 years, R/o Village Pachpedi, Tahsil - Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.). BP Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Medical and Health services department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Director, Health Servfces, Raipur (C.G.) 3 Chief Medical and Heatth Officer, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4 Accountant General, Raipur (C.G.) 5 Divisional Joint Director, Kosh, Lekha eavam Pension, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICUE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrrUTiON OF INDIA 1^^::^ Appearance: Shri Ravish Verma, Counset for the petitioner. Smt. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1,2,3&5. Smt. B.R. Maity, Advocate on behalf of Shri S.K. Beriwai, Counsel for respondent No.4. ORAL ORDER (15.07.2008) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. yvith the consent ofthe parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. This petition pertains to payment of retiral benefits. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other , ;| ;, , , , ,, , , .,»!*!; S£S-S•••i- -^B®. a&.^'t.- -;. '-^^";<-•''" ' '. '^y ae»s?s?' W.P.(S)No.3674/2008 Ig^^^ connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of the retirat dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No.105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January 2008 passed in W.P. No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. Learned counset for the parties pray and submit to dispose of the petition in terms of the earlier orders passed by this Court. 5. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shatl consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the offlcers concemed may file additional documents, If necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be compteted withln a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The petitioner shall supply one extra copy of the petition to the counsel for the State as well as to the counsel for respondent No.4 for transferring the same to the Committee. _( wB'^ •• B• m K9 ^i•• l^^a ss BS; B8 ^/^^^ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge