WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3070/2011 Ravindra Dhondiram Fad & others. ...Petitioners.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... Shri Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Shri A.D. Aghav, Advocate for petitioners. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 served. Shri K.U. More, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WRIT PETITION NO.4180/2011 Bhaktaraj Shankar Lakhe. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 2 - WRIT PETITION NO.4181/2011 Shubhangi Dharamraj Amte. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.V.A. Shinde, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4182/2011 Sushma Bhagwat Pawar. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4183/2011 Virshen Shamrao Pahare. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent no.1. WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 3 - Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4184/2011 Sangita Mahadeo Dhanawade. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent no.1. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4185/2011 Vishnu Maruti Ghayal. ...Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4186/2011 Asha Bhagwat Kalus. ...Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 4 - Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.V.A.Shinde, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4187/2011 Balasaheb Trinbakrao Satale. ...Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO.4208/2011 Prakash Arjunrao Gandge & others. ...Petitioners... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri M.S. Kokate, Advocate for petitioners. Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO. 4209/2011 Balwant Arjun Baglane. ... Petitioner.. Versus WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 5 - The State of Maharashtra & others ... Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WRIT PETITION NO. 4210/2011 Bandu Gema Jadhav. .. Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. .. Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO. 4226/2011 Jijabai Rambhau Shingate & others. ... Petitioners... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ... Respondents Shri M.S. Kokate, Advocate for petitioners. Smt. A.V. Ghondhalekar,, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO. 4232/2011 Vaijanath Baribhau Sangale. ... Petitioner.. WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 6 - Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ... Respondents Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri K.M. Surwanshi, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WRIT PETITION NO. 4251/2011 Mamtaji Gangaram Gaikwad. ... Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ... Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WRIT PETITION NO. 4254/2011 Pandit Chatrabhug Disale. ... Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others.. ... Respondents Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Smt. V.A. Shinde, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 7 - WRIT PETITION NO. 4264/2011 Sominath S/o Navnath Mane. ... Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ... Respondents... Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Smt. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 & 4. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WRIT PETITION NO. 3852/2011 Gorakshanath Karbhari Rashinkar. ... Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtara & others. ... Respondents.. Shri D.B. Pawar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.H. Dighe , AGP for respondent No. 1. Shri M.M. Neralikar, Advocate h/f Shri S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WRIT PETITION NO.4295/2011 Lahu Bharat Bhad. ...Petitioner... Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 8 - WRIT PETITION NO.4429/2011 Radhesham Shahadeo Kharsade. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents.. Shri N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.S. Dambe, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE: 22.06.2011 PER COURT : 1] The questions raised in this group of writ petitions and in the group of Writ Petitions bearing Writ Petition Nos.1152/2011, 1223/2011, 2949/2011, 2978/2011, 2778/2011, 2779/2011, 2955/2011 and 2956/2011 are similar and in view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners prayed for disposing of the present group of writ petitions in terms of the order dated 18.4.2011 by which the afore-mentioned group of writ petitions has been disposed of. The petitioners in both the group of writ petitions are similarly placed. Even the prayers made in all the petitions are similar. In view thereof, they have prayed for disposing of this group of writ petitioners in terms of the order dated 18.4.2011. WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 9 - 2] Learned counsel for the respondents also have no objection for disposing of this group of writ petitions in terms of the order dated 18.4.2011. 3] In the circumstances, this group of writ petitions is disposed of by the following order: “Every individual petitioner is allowed to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer of the respective Zilla Parishad, for the prayer, as made in the present writ petitions, with all the supporting documents and more particularly, the judgment of this Court dated 13th October, 2010, in a group of three writ petitions, within a period of four weeks from today. If the representations, as aforementioned, are made by the petitioners, the Chief Executive Officer of the respective Zilla Parishad to consider their representations on merits in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made by this Court in the judgment dated 13th October, 2010 in the group of three writ petitions so also the Government resolution dated 31.7.2009, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of their representations. The Chief Executive Officers to pass separate speaking order on the representations made by the petitioners, and communicate the same, within a period of two weeks from the date of passing the final order. WP 3070/11 & 19 others - 10 - If, for any reason, the Chief Executive Officer is prima facie not inclined to allow the petitioners’ representations for the prayer made therein, he shall give an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners before passing the final order. All contentions of the parties are kept open. It is also open to the petitioners to place, along with the representation, a copy of the writ petition/s with all annexures thereto and the reply-affidavits with all annexures, before the concerned Chief Executive Officer. With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of.” (S.B. DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B. BHOSALE, J.) ndk/c226118