E wan -1- . gmm WLé/y WRIT PETITION NO...§.1§..3....I2005 (Petition under article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) / Upendra Prasad Dani S/o Late Shri Shankar Prasad Dani aged about-73 years, R/o Takia Para,Durg Tah. & Distt.-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS V Municipal Corporation, Durg (C.G.) Commissioner, 3 igAéJnLcipa|fCorporatiom Durg (C.G.) ' Magrivéi P‘i‘ggtiggiggaghéigizigiarsieirsrgrri WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE Raipurg CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND DIRECTIONS h‘\ AA ”A A ‘ a w Mr. Jifendm Gup‘ra, counsal for fhe pefi‘rioner. Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Govt Advocafe for 1'he S‘rafe/respondenf No.3. Heard boTh fhe counsel. By The ins'ranf wrif partition under Ar'fick 226/227 of the Cons‘rifu‘rion of India: The pe‘ri‘r er has quesfioned fhe legali‘ry, proprie‘fy‘ and correcfness of 1'he order- d ed 8-5-2001 passed by fhe Commissioner, Municipa! Corporation, Durg, whe eby The peTiTioner was direcTed To deposiT The premium and land renT of R .34,935/—, and also The final noTice daTed 20-7-2004 (Annexure P-21), wh reby The peTiTioner has been direcTed To deposiT'The premium and land re Learned counsel for The eTiTioner submiTs That The peTiTioner has already preferred an appeal againsT This order before The Appeal CommiTTee of The respondenT Co poraTion, ThaT is si'ill pending and noT being decided. The peTiTioner has already filed appeal before The Appeal CommiTTee, This wriT peTiTion on This ground is noT mainTainable. The main grievance of Th peTiTioner is ThaT The said CommiTTee is noT deciding The appeal preferre by him. . Therefore, The appropr CommiTTee of The Municipal CorporaTion, Durg, consTiTuTed for The pu pose shall decide The objecTions/appeal preferred by ThepeTiTioner wiT in a period of Three monThs from The da'l’e In view of The facT Th i n i e XI—HC—22 a // r/ é $ / , L/ ~77 Wm “" m mam mm maiéa mmm WW wW ‘ éawanéw 22-7—2005 XI—HC-22 WWW 5&f respandem's shouid nof force fh With The above direcfion, In View of fhis order, M. also stand disposed of. Par‘ries are enTiTled for c‘ :r‘i'ified copy of 1'his order. of receipT of a copy of fhis order, and Til! The said appeal is’decidedr‘i‘he a pefi‘rioner 1'o deposi‘l’ fhe amount the pefi'rion stands disposed of. [W.)P‘No.2651/2005 and I.A.No.6182/2005