@ ’ (“£3 ‘a'aL Single ench 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. s No‘ ’5 ”a OF 2009 PETITIONER : Umesh Tirkey, S/o. Late Julious Tirkey, aged about 53 years, working as Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Division — Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Engineer, Panchayat 85 Rural Development Department, Rural Engineering Service, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur‘(C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 930 HE§H C$URT QF‘ CHI-EATTISGARI-I ‘RT BELASPUR SB : EION’BLEM SHRI JUSTICE ?R§’P§NKER $EWA1KER W.P.g$§ l‘é’G. 3£77g 2009 Um€sh ‘Tirkey PETE’E‘E$NE_E W State sf Cl} an Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CDNSTETUTIQK OF ENDIA AEE£31&&C€: Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, counsel for tbs patitionar. ShnT Shashalak Thalnlr, P‘L. for rim Staze; om 0mm (05.012099; Chaiknge’ in the present petitien is to the order dated. 27.6.2009 (Annexure P/ I) by which th€ petitioner who is working as Incharge, Executive Engineer has been transferred &om the offxce of Rural Engineering Service, Division Malwahi, Distn’ct Bilaspur to the 0&ce of Sub DivisionalJ/Ofiicer, Rural Engineen'ng Service, Bijapur, Distn'ct Bijapur. Contention of leamed Counsel for the petitioner is that in his present piace of posting he has hardly completed one year and de hors the transfer glolicy and guidelines of the government, he has been shifted. He further submits that though he is working as Executive Engineer, but he has been trailsferred as Sub Divisional Officer. Lemned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents and till the same is decitied he may not be relieved from his present place ofposting. Lealned counsel for thé State has no Gbjaction if a direcu’on for deciding the reprasemation is mads. Considsn'ng Th6 tota1ity of the facts, thc petitioner is directed to make a representation to The respondsnts No. 1 8v; “ 2 Within a period of sewn days from the date of receipt of this order, which shall be decided by The authorifies‘ concerned Within a further period of three WeekS from the date of its receipt. It is cian'iied that till one month from today the petitioner 511811 not be relieved from the present place of posting, ifnot already relieved, With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. (9/ Pritinker Diwaker Judge