§ I C‘ ’9’ i 9%”V single may IN THF HIGH COURT OF .TUDICATURF AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION s No. ESA of 2009 PETITIONER Anand Raj Singh, son of LaTe Amar‘ Singh, aged 45 years, Suns’rha Pmbhandak, Zila Shahkar‘i Kendriya Bank Maryadif, , Korbi, Disfr‘ic‘r Korba/ residen’r of Village Korbi' P.5. Pasaan, Tehsil Disfr'ic‘r Kor‘ba. Podi—uproda, Vs RESPONDENTS Zila Shahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadi‘r, Bilaspur Through ifs Chief ExecuTive Officer, Head Office, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (CG). 2. Adim Ja’ri Sevu Shahkari SamiTi Maryadi‘r, Korbi Through ifs Manager, Korbi, DisTricT Korba (CG). 3. Shri Rooplal Jaiswal, Manager x 1/ In—charge, 'Adim JaTi Seva Shahkari Samifi MaryadiT, Korbi Dis’rricf Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , L, PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER';— As per The cause “rifle. :%[r@.,c§.>w3ysw7/gi 2007 m W (Wm $Wm Sd/- Judge l . Pritinker Diwaker f $3 : i—EQE’ELE E§HRI JUSTECE PRM‘WKER DEWAKER 117.97.2QQ9 Shri Vivak Chopra, coun ;e1 for thé petiti ner, Shri Arvind Dubey, PL ior the Stats. At the outset, counsel for th€ petitionsr wants to Withdraw th6 pi‘esant petition with liberty tc file 1‘Epr6sentation befora responcient y, \ No.1 raising all his grievances, ' so submits that direction may be issued to respondent No.1 for deciding the representation so made expeditiously. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to Withdraw the present petition with liberty as afore: aidi in the eventuality of iling such the within of ten from the representation by petitione a period days date of receipt of copy of this order, the sari e would be decided by \ -- K1 the authorities concerned wittin a period of three weeks from the I clate of its receipt. l