IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO )NO.978 OF 2009 AND M.C.A. ST.NO. 12127 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2223 OF 2009 (BHAGWAN PUNDLIKRAO BHOYAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri S.D.Shukla, Advocate for Petitioner. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 05, 2009. Accepting reasons towards delay caused in filing application for restoration as well as reasons towards absence on the date when the writ petition was dismissed, both the applications are allowed. Writ Petition No. 2223 of 2009 is restored to file. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2223 OF 2009 (BHAGWAN PUNDLIKRAO BHOYAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri S.D.Shukla, Advocate for Petitioner. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 05, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner challenges wrongful nomination of the respondents. Admittedly, the process of election was over on the date when the petition was listed, for the first time, for hearing. The remedy for challenging the election on the ground of wrongful acceptance of nomination was available to the petitioner in law. 3. In this background, it is not necessary to grant any indulgence in the writ petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.