IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 25161 of 2008(U) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- GIGI RENIL, MANIKKATH HOUSE, P.P.ERANALLUR, KECHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BIJI MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DIST. 3. GIXON, S/O.SUNNY, MANALIL HOUSE, PORKULAM, POOMARAM, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1, R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO. 25161/2008-U APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 2007 BEFORE THE J.F.C.M COURT, KUNNAMKULAM. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.471/07 KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 25/06/07. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REFERREL NOTICE DATED 11/12/07. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30/07/2008. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16/03/07. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rs/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.25161 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF OCTOBER, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that the 2nd respondent is harassing her at the instance of the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent filed a private complaint against the petitioner, which was forwarded by the learned Magistrate to the police, under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. Though, a crime was registered, later, the matter was closed by the police, finding that the allegations were unfounded and filed a report before the Magistrate under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Thereupon, the closure of the complaint was informed to the complainant from the Magistrate's Court as per Exhibit P4. The petitioner submits, instead of filing a protest complaint, the 3rd respondent filed another representation before the 2nd respondent, Exhibit P5 and based on that she was summoned to the Police Station. Feeling aggrieved by the above action of the Circle Inspector, this Writ Petition is filed. W.P.(C)No.25161/08 -2- 2. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that after Exhibit P4, the police have not investigated the matter and the police have no intention to harass the petitioner based on the incident which led to the issuance of Exhibit P4. This submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn