BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.13067 of 2011 VAIRAMANI ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No. Not known of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there is no case and no F.I.R., has been registered against the petitioner and hence, he prays for the dismissal of the petition. 4. Considering the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, I am inclined to give a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of petition enquiry. The respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. sd/- 28/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 2. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13067 of 2011 Date :28/09/2011 RJ/3.10.11/(1p/3c) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/