CM No.12311-CII/2011 and CR No.6121/2007(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.12311-CII/2011 and CR No.6121/2007(O&M) Date of decision: 11.05.2011. Smt.Nachhatro Devi and others ....................Petitioners v. Ram Singh and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.JS Bhatia,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Khetarpal,Advocate for the respondents. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Instant application under Section 151 CPC has been filed by the petitioners for dismissal of the revision petition bearing CR No.6121 of 2007, as having become infructuous, which is fixed for 16.8.2011, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Notice of the application to the counsel for respondents. Mr.Anil Khetarpal,Advocate who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that he has no objection if the date of hearing of revision petition is preponed from 16.8.2011 and the same is taken up for hearing today itself. In view of the agreed stand the date of hearing of Civil Revision NO.6121 of 2007 is preponed from 16.8.2011 and the same is taken up for hearing. It is apparent from the record that the instant revision CM No.12311-CII/2011 and CR No.6121/2007(O&M) 2 petition under Section 115 CPC was filed by the defendants/petitioners assailing the judgment and decree dated 31.1.2007 passed by the learned appellate court whereby their challenge to a purportedly consent decree dated 26.3.1997 was dismissed as not maintainable in view of provisions of Section 96(3) CPC. At the time of hearing learned counsel for the defendants/petitioners points out that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties,who are family members, and it has been agreed that the family settlement arrived at with respect to the properties in question would be as per the judgment and decree dated 26.3.1997. Learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs points out that respondent nos. 3 and 4 who were minor at the time of filing of the suit have subsequently attained majority on 14.12.2004 and 18.1.2004 respectively and hence are fully competent to arrive at a compromise. He further states that he has no objection if the present revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. In view of the agreed stand between the learned counsel for the parties, the Civil Miscellaneous application bearing no.12311- CII/2011 is allowed and CR No.6121 of 2007 is dismissed as having become infructuous. 11.05.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge