m^ HIGHCQURTOFCHH^r'TISGARUATKt.ASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: ADDellants/ Clairnarrts ^ON'Bl.ElHRlRAliE^GUPTA.CJ. HQN'BLESWI^RAI^N^^^H^ M.O.G. No. 288 6f 2010 i 1^^^^^^^^^ ^ Ramteke; ageSOyears 2 ^/ijay^ l^nt, B/o^^^^^ L^ Sjngh Rarnteke; agje 38 years. 3 0eo Kant.^/oLatejShishPaaJSingh Ramteke; aged32years; 4 KU^^ K^ SjnghRamteke; ag^SS yeare. ! . • ' '.'i- ' •' "••'•''• . / ^ll residerrt of VilIelge^Aarod, Tahsji Gharama, Districtl N Kanker"Ghhattisgafh" 1 1 i^ Bl fli il? : % :BI ;s W4 Nori-aDDliGants Resbondents l;l-';i:' ;1 •::VERSUS:':..1;.'..'',^''1!1^ Raju Das Banjare S/p Ramayan Dsas, Caste; Satnatfti; age about 31 years, residerit ofj village^^^^^^^M P.S. Nandghat; 1 District Durg "GhhattisgaFh" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ ""Qm^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ M/s Rajnandgaon Road l-ines; Head :0ffice Raipur (CQ) through Srnt. CSurusharah Singh^ V^ SinghGarcha; re^iderrtofCiviiLines, Raipur "Near ©andhi Udyan; "Chhattisgarh" j "Owner" t The New India Insurance CQmpariy Ljmited, ©ivisionalQffice.FJrst^loor, Madeena fiuilding, yail ROad, Raipur Aghan Baj VV/o L^e Sh Singh Ramteke; ^since^keepJ^ age ataout54years, j^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 5 Yakesh Kumar S/o Late Shish Paal Singh Ramteke, aged about 38 .yeaFs.-.',. ,.>,:, ^,.':' Respondent No,|4and 5 Residentof Viilage Aaroud, Tah. Charama, Distt. Kanker(CG). ApDlication forrestoration bf M.A.fONo. 64/2008 as djsmissed on 12-04-2010 Present: ShrtR.N.Jha, learned counsel forthe petitioners. ORDER (18tnJune,2010)| The following order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta, CJ. Shri R. N. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restQration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoratjon of MAC No.64 of 2008, which came_tQ be dismissed forwant of prosecution vide^ Orderdated 12.04.2010. 3) On due consideration of the submissjpns of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petjtion, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners'/appeilants' counsel on 12.04.2010, when MAC No.64/2008 was taken-up for hearing;was based on 6o/?a f/efe grounds. 4). M.C.C. No.288 of 2010, therefore, is allowed and M.A.C.No.64/2008 is restored to its original number. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge i<^