IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31746 of 2009 1. MOTILAL SAH 2. RAMBHAWATI DEVI 3. RIPUSHUDAN SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law, are in custody in a Police case under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the husband is already in custody. The impugned order noticed that the marriage was 8 years old. Paragraph 47, 52 and 57 of the case diary noticed that it was an accidental death and not murder. The prayer for bail has been rejected treating it as a case under Section 304B of the Penal Code raising demands of dowry. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah in Sathi P.S. Case No. 41 of 2009. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)