IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23012 of 2011 1. Sujita Devi @ Sujata, wife of Baijnath Harijan @ Baidyanath Harijan. 2. Baidyanath Harijan @ Baijnath Harijan @ Baijnath Das (Harijan) son of Late Kutay Harijan. Both residents of village – Danda Bazar, P.S. – Sabour (Goradih), District – Bhagalpur. 3. Babu Lal Harijan, son of Chaturi Harijan 4. Mahesh Paswan, son of Sukhdeon Paswan. Both resident of village – Sarth, P.S. – Sabour (Goradih), District – Bhagalpur. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar ------Opposite Party ----------- 02. 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Sabour (Goradih) P.S. Case No. 51/2010 for the offences under Sections 419/420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur. All the four petitioners are named accused in this case specifically petitioner no. 1 carries allegation of withdrawing a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) in the named of one deceased Sudha Devi, with the help of others including petitioner nos. 2 and 4. Other co-accused being Mukhiya and Panchayat Sachiv have already been granted privilege on deposit of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) by a Bench of this 2 court vide order dated 11.10.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32951/2010. Considering the facts and circumstances, subject to deposit of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with the court below only subject to decision of the case, and in the their event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sabour (Goradih) P.S. Case No. 51/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition with respect to petitioner nos. 1 and 2 to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)