In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1846 of 2005 Date of decision: May 14, 2009 Angrej Singh and others .. Petitioners Vs. Tek Chand and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the respondents No.16 to 18 and 109 to 112. A.N. Jindal, J This revision petition is directed against the order dated 12.3.2005 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kurukshetra whereby the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed. The matter with regard to payment of court fee is between the plaintiff and the court, and the defendants are not in any way going to be affected by the order. As such, no revision petition is maintainable. Reliance could be placed on the Full Bench judgment delivered by this Court in case M/s Arjan Motors vs. Girdhara Singh and others, 1978 P.L.J. 36. Since revision petition is not maintainable, thererfore, the petitioners cannot use Article 227 of the Constitution of India as a device to challenge the order. Dismissed. May 14, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge