IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 36 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 11/03/2004 in WP NO : 13144 OF 1992 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Mohd. Hasham, s/o Mohd. Azam, R/o H.No. 1-3-122, Rajendranagar, Mahaboobnagar - 509 001. ..... APPELLANT AND 1. The Director General & Inspector General of Police, A.P. Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant : MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents.: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR HOME The Court at the stage of admission, made the following ORDER: (PER TMK,J) This appeal is filed by the appellant/writ petitioner aggrieved by the order of a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.13144 of 1992 dated 11-03-2004. Heard. The writ petition has been filed to declare the action of the respondents in not implementing the orders of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in R.P.No.3514 of 1987 dated 30.10.1987 as illegal. The learned single Judge of this Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the question of implementing the orders passed in the year 1987, at this stage, does not arise. In view of the above observation of the learned single Judge, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order much less we do not find any illegality or irregularity. Under the above circumstances, the writ appeal is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (T.MEENA KUMARI, J) (S.ANANDA REDDY, J) 18/01/2005 bsv/lvl To 1. The Director General & Inspector General of Police, A.P. Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4. Two CD copies