IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11396 of 2011 1. RAJESH SINGH 2. RUSIAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 02 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, petitioners took the deceased from his house and subsequently, the dead body of the deceased was found. The informant states in his Ferdbeyan that he came to know from local people that the petitioners had assaulted the deceased. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge reveals that witnesses at Paragraph Nos. 8, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the case diary have stated only the factum of taking away the deceased by the petitioners and so far as Para 74 of the case diary is concerned, it has specifically been pleaded at Para 18 of this application that the aforesaid paragraph is nothing but only a disclosure made by spy of the police. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 176 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )