IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 2ND ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 18086 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. D. SUJATHA, W/O.JAYACHANDRAN, AGED 40, JAYABHAVAN, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY, ALAPPUZHA DT. 2. JAYACHANDRAN, JAYABHAVAN, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY, ALAPPUZHA DT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANAKAKKUNNU POLICE STATION, KARTHIKAPPALLY. 3. BHASKARAN, THUNDIL HOUSE, MUTHUKULAM VADAKKUM MURI, MUTHUKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAYAMKULAM. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1, R2 & R4 ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE & SRI.A.V.JOJO FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No. 18086/08 PETITIONERS' EXTS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 10.12.07 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8.2.08 IN W.P.(C)No.4692/08 PASSED BY THIS COURT,. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 14.5.08 BY THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE, MUTHUKULAM. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: EXT.R3(a): PHOTOCOPY OF THE PAPER REPORTS DATED 7.2.08 AND 9.2.08. EXT.R3(b): TRUE COPY OF THE FIR.26/08 DATED 22.1.08. EXT.R3(c): TRUE COPY OF THE FIR.186/08 DATED 15.6.08. TRUE COPY K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 18086 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioners have approached this Court alleging that they are being harassed by the police unnecessarily. The first petitioner is a Panchayath member. She is a member of Muthukulam Grama Panchayath. It is submitted that the 2nd petitioner is her husband. 2. The third respondent has filed a counter affidavit in which it is stated that the 2nd petitioner is a hardened criminal involved in many criminal cases and also Abkari cases. 3. We heard the learned Government Pleader for the official respondents also. Today we have heard and disposed of W.P.(C) No.4962/2008 and we had occasion to consider the activities of the second petitioner. In view of the decision taken in that writ petition, we feel that no relief could be granted to the second petitioner in this writ petition. But we record the submission of W.P.(C)NO.18086/2008 -2- the learned Government Pleader that if any action is proposed to be taken against the first petitioner, the same shall be taken in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of as above. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI JUDGE ks.