IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 30074 of 2010(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINU ANTONY, W/O ANTONY, KUTTANCHALIL, ALANGAD VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK, VARAPPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.SHIHAB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, H.P.UNIT, ERNAKULAM. COCHIN - 16. 2. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR-V), KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., THRISSUR-20. ADV. SRI.M.L.SAJEEV,SC,K.S.F.E. LTD FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.30074 of 2010-H ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2010. J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against revenue recovery steps initiated at the behest of the 1st respondent for realising amounts due under a loan account, which was availed by the petitioner on the basis of a chitty transaction. 2. Eventhough this Court was not impressed with any of the contentions raised, as a gesture of indulgence an interim stay was granted on 30.9.2010 subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.50,000/- within two weeks. Subsequently, the petitioner had filed I.A.No.15324 of 2010 seeking extension of the time stipulated for payment, in which it was stated that in compliance with the interim order an amount of Rs.25,000/- was already paid. Considering such payment, extension of time was granted till 20.11.2010. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner has not complied with the condition even within the extended W.P(C) No.30074 of 2010-H 2 period. Under such circumstances, I am not inclined to show any indulgence in entertaining this writ petition. 4. Therefore the writ petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that it will be left open to the petitioner to approach the respondents seeking settlement of the account by offering payment within any reasonable time, and also to seek waiver of amounts, if any possible. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE ab