HIsH COURT OF cHHAmssARH. AT AsPU $IN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA, Ag. C.J. u o.7 o Banshi Lal, 5/0 Hincharahx :Kumhar- Aged abou1' 4O year's,’ R/o' Village - Demar, Tahsil and Di§+ric+ - Dhamtar-i (CG) Versus 1) sme ,of‘ nahhaHisgarhnhrough ‘ Coliecforf Dhammri, Disfricf — Dhamiar'i(CG) ‘5ub-Di’visional Oficer Disfricf '- Dham‘rar-i (CG) Tahsildari Tahsil Gfficar, Dhamari Disfric? - Dhgmfm'i (C6) Grwn Shiksha SarnHi, Demar Dh‘amfari Dis‘h‘icf - Dham‘rari (CG) ihr-ough Hs residem Gram Shiksha 5amiti, Demur- Dhamfari, District __ Dhamfar'i Janbhagidar'i dnd VikasW 5amifi Goverhmenf Higher Secondary , School, DemdrLTahsil & ‘Disfr'ici' - Dhmmr‘i (C6) fhr-ough 7 ifs President Janbhagidari and / Vikas Sami'ri GoVer-nmenf Higher Secondary 5chooi, Demarf, Tahsil & Dis'rricf - Dham‘i'ari C9) Wrif Pefmon under- Ar'hcle 227 of The Cons1'nui'lon of India 5hr! Sunll ahu counsei for fhe pei‘oner Shrl VVS Murth Depufy Advocafe General for fhe Sfa‘re PETITIO ER bham'iari, (2) 3) 4) Present. S m y ‘ oRAL ORDER (Passed on 13'" August 2007) This wri‘r pe‘i'i'rion is direcied againstfl'he order passed by 1'he ‘I'riai Couri' dafed 01.05.2007 allowing ihe applicafion under Order I, Rule 10 of ‘rhe Code of Civil Procedure aILk Wm mm (Q QR) N4s2 ‘f 2007 a'EsPONoENTs ’ ( , , , P ._ ( ( ( 1 i 5%“ . Learned'counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in possession of The ‘land in quesTion and ‘rher‘efore, newly addgd, respondents No. 4 6: 5 are n’of necessary parties. No other poinf . has‘been raised; It has beenpointed out by learned Deputy Advocate General 111a? responden'rs No. 4 & 5, as indioafed, are in possession and They are necessary par'ries,. If has also been poin‘red oui’ that cer'rain en'rries are in favour of respondents No. 4 & 5. ‘The impugned onder' is a speaking and reasoned order. Counsel for the pefi‘rioner failed To subs‘mnfia‘re any ground. No interference is called for. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed- Sdl— l l Jagdish Bhalia Ag. Chief Justice l W)-*,\J, l l