IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1215 OF 2008 (SMT. TRUPTI MANISH PRABHU.. Vs.. MANISH SHRIKRISHNA PRABHU.) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Smt. P.M.Chandekar, Advocate for Applicant. Shri Shashank Manohar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri A. Mujumdar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : APRIL 21, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Though the matter was argued at length, elaborating all the legal and factual issues involved, ultimately petitioner and respondent No.1 agreed that Petition No.A-772/2008, pending before Family Court No.5 at Pune may be transferred to Principal Judge, Family Court at Nagpur for disposal according to law. 3. The petitioner/ wife agrees that respondent No.1 would not be required to personally remain present before Family Court at Nagpur, except once for conciliation and on the dates of recording of evidence of respondent No.1, which the parties agree to complete in one or two hearings. 4. It is pointed out that petitioner's application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is listed before the Family Court at Nagpur on 22nd April, 2009. The respondent-husband would appear within one week and if the matter is referred to counselor the petitioner and respondent No.1 agree that they would try to sort out the matter of custody/ access of the minor daughters, so that these vacations can be utilised for providing respondent No.1 access to the daughters. 5. Registry shall immediately send this order to the Family Court at Pune by Fax and E-mail and to ensure that the record of the proceedings before the Family Court at Pune should reach the Family Court at Nagpur at the earliest. 6. Petitioner and respondent No.1 shall appear before the Family Court at Nagpur on 30th April, 2009 at 10.30 a.m. and the Family Court at Nagpur shall proceed with the matter, if the record is not received from the Family Court at Pune, on the authenticated copies of the proceedings which the parties have with them. 7. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 Shri Mujumdar objects to transfer of the proceedings from Family Court at Pune to Family Court at Nagpur. But since, respondent No.2 resides at Nagpur itself he is not likely to suffer any inconvenience. 8. As far as respondent No.3 is concerned, he is yet to be served. He is shown to be residing in USA. It would make no difference, to the said respondent, whether the petition is heard at Pune or at Nagpur. 9. The application is disposed of on the above terms. JUDGE RR.