IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 202 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 09th November, 2009. Naseem Ahmad & Ors. Petitioners through Mr. J.V.Yadav, Advocate Versus Ram Saran Dass [died] through LRs & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition has been preferred against the order dated 18.11.2008 passed by the Additional Civil Judge [Senior Division], Punhana, District Gurgaon dismissing the petitioners' objections in the light of the judgment passed by the Civil Court in Civil Suit No. 109/9.4.1998 [Naseem Ahmad & Ors. V Ram Saran Dass & Ors.]. Counsel for respondents No. 1[a] to [f] points out that the petitioners had preferred an appeal against the aforementioned judgment and decree of the Civil Court which has also been dismissed by the first Appellate Court vide its judgment and decree dated 24.8.2009. In this view of the matter, it is not in dispute that this revision petition, in a way, has been rendered infructuous, however, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to prefer a Regular Second Appeal against the aforementioned judgment and decree dated 24.8.2009 passed by the first Appellate Court. Disposed of accordingly. November 09, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE