KBP wp5446-09.sxw : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5446 OF 2009 Rudrapratap Umelia Tripathi .. Petitioner V/s. Smt.Parvatibai Padmakar Patil and ors. ..Respondents ..... Mr.Anilkumar Patil, for applicants. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 22 nd JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard Advocate for petitioner. The petitioner is a third party who has been ordered to be impleaded as party Defendant No.2 to the suit filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2] According to the case of first and second respondents, under an agreement the suit property has been taken over by the petitioner for development and, therefore, an application was made for impleading the petitioner as a party. Considering prima facie material on record, the impugned order has been passed permitting amendment of the plaint for impleading the petitioner as a party. 3] No case is made out for interference in the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, all the contentions of the petitioner are kept open. He may raise the contentions by filing written statement. Subject to what is observed, the writ petition is rejected. ( A.S.OKA, J. )