IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11969 of 2010 1. GANESH MISTRI @ GANESHI SHARMA S/O RAM PRASAD MISTRI R/O VILLAGE AND P.O.- BARA, P.S.- KHODAWANTPUR, PR. BHUSHARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. SHYAM SUNDARI DEVI D/O LATE SOMAN BHAGAT R/O VILLAGE & P.O.- BARA, P.S.- KHODAWANDPUR, PR. BHUSARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 2. RAM SEWAK BHAGAT S/O SONAM BHAGAT R/O VILLAGE & P.O.- BARA, P.S.- KHODAWANDPUR, PR. BHUSARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 3. RAM BAHADUR BHAGAT S/O SONAM BHAGAT R/O VILLAGE & P.O.- BARA, P.S.- KHODAWANDPUR, PR. BHUSARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 4. BHOLA BHAGAT S/O DORIK BHAGAT R/O VILLAGE & P.O.- BARA, P.S.- KHODAWANDPUR, PR. BHUSARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 5. ARBIND BHAGAT MINOR S/O DORIK BHAGAT UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS BROTHER BHOLA BHAGAT R/O VILLAGE & P.O.- BARA, P.S.- KHODAWANDPUR, PR. BHUSARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 6. LUCHO DEVI W/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 7. CHANO DEVI D/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 8. MANO DEVI D/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 9. DEIGJEE DEVI D/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 10. RAM SAGAR MISTRY S/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 11. RAM AUTAR MISTRY S/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 12. RAM NARAYAN MISTRY S/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 13. RAM BAHADUR MISTRY S/O LATE LADDULAL MISTRY R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BAHRBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 14. KOILI DEVI W/O JUGESHWAR SHARMA R/O VILL.- LAKHANPATI, P.S. KHODOWANDPUR, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 15. SUSHILA DEVI W/O GHANSHYAM SHARMA R/O VILL.- SAHPUR, P.O.- BHARBARI VIA MANGAL GARH, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR 16. JAIDEO MISTRY S/O RAM PRASAD MISTRI R/O VILL. AND P.O.- BARA, P.S. KHODAWANDPUR, PR. BHUSARI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI ----------- 2/ 07/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. On the own showing of the petitioner, the amendment of the plaint was allowed on the application preferred by the plaintiff. It is fairly acknowledged that the challenge to the same on behalf of the present 2 petitioner defendant was unsuccessful. The impugned order allows the formal incorporation belatedly subject to payment of costs. This Court finds no reason to interfere with the same. The writ application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)