CLCON No.161 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Harendra Belwal, the learned counsel for the applicants. Mr. R. C. Arya, the learned counsel for the opposite parties. The appellate court in various Special Appeals delivered the judgment dated 09.01.2009 directing the appellants, namely, the State of Uttarakhand to consider the case of the applicants from the date of the judgment. Since the order of the appellate court was not complied with, the present contempt application has been filed in which notices were issued to opposite party nos.1, 2 & 3. Notices have been served and in response, the opposite party nos.2 & 3 have filed their affidavit indicating that a Sub-Committee under the Chairmanship of senior Cabinet Minister was appointed to take a decision for regularization. This direction was issued sometimes in January, 2010, which seems to have been modified on 05.03.2010. Nothing has been indicated as to what decision has been taken by the Sub Committee and, in any case, the court is of the opinion that the Sub Committee cannot take a decision which is contrary to the direction of the appellate court. From a perusal of the affidavits filed by the parties, it is clear that a willful disobedience of the direction of the court prima facie is made out against the opposite parties. This court, by its order dated 26.11.2010, had directed respondent no.3 to be present in court. In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that the opposite party nos.1, 2 & 3 shall appear in person before this Court on 23rd March, 2011 for the framing of the charge. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 11.03.2011 LSR