Crl.M.No.25518-M of 2010 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.25518-M of 2010 Date of order: 1.9.2010 Gagandeep Singh ....Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:Mr. S.S. Siao, Advocate for the petitioner. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner, who is the complainant in FIR No.68 dated 27.3.2010 under Sections 306/34 IPC, P.S City Ferozepur with regard to the unnatural death of her sister-Gurpreet Kaur, has filed the instant petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C for cancellation of regular bail granted to respondent Nos.2/father-in-law, respondent No.3/mother-in-law and respondent No.4/Nanad of the deceased sister. It is stated that sister of the petitioner was married to Sukhwinder Singh on 17.11.2009 and on account of demand for dowry and consequently beatings, her sister was driven to commit suicide. Learned Additional Sessions Judge while granting bail to respondent Nos.2 to 4 has observed thus: “Moreover, accused Gurdial Singh is aged about 72 years as he underwent heart surgery in the year 1997 when he was 60 years of age. He has the right to be released on the medical grounds also. Other accused Surinder Kaur wife of Gurdial Singh is 66 years old and being lady she is also having the right to get the Crl.M.No.25518-M of 2010 #2# bail as a matter of right. Accused Satwinder Kaur is the widowed sister-in-law of the deceased and working as a Teacher is the mother of two grown up children,the daughter aged about 19 years and son aged about 17 years. Their mother is in jail and there is no one to look after the children and, therefore, she is also entitled to get the concession of bail as her detention in the custody is likely to harm the future perspective and the interests of the children of Satwinder Kaur.” Learned counsel submits that after they were released on bail, they have threatened the petitioner and, therefore, bail granted to them is liable to be cancelled. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am convinced that no case for cancellation of bail is made out. It is not disputed that the challan has been presented in the present case and the trial has commenced. A perusal of P.2 reveals that the only allegations made are that respondent Nos.2 to 4 while roaming have used filthy language and stated that nothing has happened with them and they will see the petitioner. No ground for cancellation of bail is made out. Dismissed. September 01, 2010 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE