IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1187 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:21.02.2011 Suresh Chand Goyal and another . . .Petitioners Versus Kalicharan . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rohit Ahuja, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that on 10.1.2011, case was adjourned to 13.1.2011 for filing reply to the amended eviction petition. On that day, reply was not filed and an adjournment was sought. Consequently, the case was adjourned to 20.1.2011. On that day also reply could not be filed because the petitioners were looking after their 75 years old mother, who is seriously ill and bedridden from the last few months. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that if one last opportunity is granted, they would file reply to the amended eviction petition, subject to payment of costs. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case that the learned Rent Controller had granted only 10 days time in all for filing reply to the amended eviction petition, which could not be filed due to the reason assigned hereinabove and that the respondent could be compensated with costs, without issuing notice to the respondent, this revision petition is hereby disposed of by granting one last opportunity to the petitioners to file reply to the amended eviction petition on the date already fixed i.e. 03.03.2011, subject to payment of `10,000/- as costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) FEBRUARY 21, 2011 JUDGE Vivek