1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21 .07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9002 of 2011 Jayalakshmi : Petitioner -Vs- State rep. By 1.The Inspector of Police, Fort Police Station, Trichy. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichirapalli. : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the 2nd respondent to supervise the investigation and to direct the 1st respondent to investigate in accordance with law the case in crime No.852 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohaideen Basha For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan G.A. (Crl. Side) O R D E R This petition is filed to direct the 2nd respondent to supervise the investigation and to direct the 1st respondent to investigate in accordance with law the case in crime No.852 of 2011 on the file of the 1st respondent. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has lodged a complaint on 20.05.2011 for the offence under Sections 448, 427 and 506(i) I.P.C. and the same has been registered in crime No.852 of 2011, as per the order of this Court dated 16.06.2001 made in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.6965 of 2011, but, the 1st respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the matter and to file the charge sheet. 3.He would further submit that the daughter-in-law has thrown out the petitioner in view of the protection order obtained by her. Even though, it was reversed subsequently, but, the petitioner was not allowed to stay in her house. Furthermore, the 1st respondent is not taking any steps to investigate the matter and file the charge sheet and hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present application directing the Commissioner of Police, to take personal attention in this matter in investigating the matter and filing the charge sheet. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, who is 62 years ages lady was thrown out by her daughter- in-law by way of a protection order, which was subsequently set aside. Thereafter only, the petitioner has preferred a complaint and the same was not registered by the respondent and hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing Crl.O.P.(MD) No.6965 of 2011, in which, this Court passed on order dated 16.06.2011, directing the 1st respondent to register the case and on receipt of the said order only, the case has been registered in crime No.852 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 448, 427 and 506(i) I.P.C. by the 1st respondent, however, he has not shown any interest in investigating the matter. 5.In such circumstances, I am of the view that to meet the ends of justice, a direction shall be given to the 2nd respondent. Accordingly, the 2nd respondent to that the 2nd respondent, Commissioner of Police, Trichy City is directed to depute any one of the neutral officer to investigate the matter under his personal attention and to file the charge sheet within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Fort Police Station, Trichy. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichirapalli. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, Advocate, Sr.No.24253 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9002 of 2011 21.07.2011 arul SMA/29.7.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/