IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20241 of 2010(E) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ T. NALINAM, RESIDING AT ATHIRA HOUSE, PANACHIKAVU P.O., PERUNNA, CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOTTAYAM. 3. K.R. SUKUMARI, RESIDING AT GOKULAM HOUSE, THENGANA, PERUMPANACHI P.O., CHANGANACHERRY. 4. INDIRA SABU, RESIDING AT THIRUVANKUZHI, S.PURAM, KURICHI P.O., KOTTAYAM. R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20241 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th June, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the President of the Changanacherry Co-operative Women's Welfare Service Society Ltd. She complains that the third respondent - erstwhile Honorary Secretary along with the fourth respondent had manipulated the records to the Society and managed to misappropriate large amounts of money belonging to the depositors of the Society. Though various complaints were made to the authorities including the second respondent, no action was taken. A complaint has been filed before the Vigilance Department also, which is pending. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 representation to the first respondent. Though Ext.P4 was submitted on 5.6.2009, the petitioner complains that no action has been taken thereon, though more than an year has elapsed. The petitioner, therefore seeks appropriate directions for an early action on Ext.P4. 2. In view of the limited relief that is sought for, I do wpc No.20241/2010 2 not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondents. The learned Government Pleader has no objection to a direction being issued for an early disposal of Ext.P4. 3. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the complaints of the petitioner set out in Ext.P4 and to take appropriate action thereon, as enjoined by law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 and 4. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/