IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27456 of 2010(F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- M.G.DAS, AGED 47 YEARS, SON OF KRISHNAN UNNITHAN, RESIDING AT VISHNUMANGALAM VEEDU, NEAR PERUNKADAVILA GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL,PERUNKADAVILA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARIYANCODE POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PION 695125. 3. UNNIKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT THARANGAM, PERUNKADAVILA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695124. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. T.K. VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sou. THOTTATHIL .B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ ------------------------------------------------- W.P.C. No. 27456 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T THOTTATHIL .B. RADHAKRISHNAN We heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 2. Though the petitioner stands accusing the 3rd respondent that he is indulging in money lending in violation of the Money Lender's Act, the fact of the matter remains that he borrowed money from the 3rd respondent. He has even stated in paragraph 3 of the writ petition that he had agreed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- to the 3rd respondent on or before 31.8.2010. Learned counsel for petitioner frankly stated that the said amount has not been paid. The FIS in Ext.P1 registered on 21.8.2010 also reflects that the controversy between petitioner and 3rd respondent relates to return of money. We are therefore of the view that all needs to be done is that police officials will ensure that law and order is maintained and any complaint of the petitioner about any commissions or omissions which would W.P.(c) No.27456/10 2 amount to an offence is properly taken care of by police. It was also to be ensured that police does not interfere with any civil dispute between parties. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL .B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. Sou.