Civil Revision No. 7243 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 7243 of 2009 Date of Decision: 22.7.2010 Satpal and Another …Petitioners Versus Charan Dass …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Abhishek Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The defendant to the suit had filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the written statement with a prayer that he be permitted to delete the word “Suit” prior to word “Property” from the second line of sub para (c) at page 4 of the written statement. It was further prayed that respondent/defendant be permitted to add the following portion in sub para (c), after the words “truck body building”:- “...& the property for said business is just about 300 feet away from the suit property, for which the plot was purchased by the defendant & construction was raised in 1996. Moreover, since the defendant was in the possession of the suit property & as such it was necessary for him to have his business nearby”. Civil Revision No. 7243 of 2009 2 The trial Court, after hearing learned counsel for the parties, allowed the amendment holding that the amendment sought is only explanatory in nature and would not change the nature of the suit. A copy of impugned order dated 10.9.2009 is at Annexure P6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. No ground is made out to cause interference in the order under revision, especially when the suit is ripe for disposal and fixed for arguments. Even otherwise, by allowing the amendment, no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner. Hence, there is no merit in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 22, 2010 “DK”