CRLMB 9709/09 Umesh Vijay Vs. State (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9709/2009 Umesh Vijay Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 8th February, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Bhandari Mr. N.K.Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr. Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor. .......... Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. It is stated that so far petitioner is concerned, he was working for and on behalf of dealer, thus, is not involved in this case and only that he was brining back palm oil and ghee on the instructions of the dealer Raju, thus, petitioner is behind the bars for last few months and may be released on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Umesh Vijay on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.208/2009 registered at Police Station- Kotwali, Fatehpur for offence under sections 420, 272, 273 of IPC read with section 7/16 of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 provided he, furnishes a personal bond in the sum of CRLMB 9709/09 Umesh Vijay Vs. State (2) Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (M.N. Bhandari),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D32