CWP No. 12109 of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12109 of 2007 Date of Order: 20.8.2010 Surjit Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present: Mr. Sanjeev Manrai, for the petitioners. Mr. C.S. Brar, DAG, Punjab, for respondents no.1 to 4. Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocate for respondent no.5. ..... RAJIVE BHALLA, J Prayer in this petition is for quashing orders dated 15.9.2005, 29.11.2006 and 14.5.2007, passed by the Collector, Sub Division, Jaito, the Commissioner, Faridkot Division, Faridkot and the Financial Commissioner, Appeals-I, Punjab. Guranditta Singh filed an application for partition of 320 kanals 14 marlas, situated in village Bajakhana, Tehsil and Distt. Faridkot, in the year 1991. The Assistant Collector, Ist Grade, Faridkot, sanctioned Naksha Be on 21.12.1998. The petitioners filed an appeal before the Collector, Sub Division Faridkot. Vide order dated 4.4.2001, the Collector set aside the order passed by the Assistant Collector, Ist Grade and directed him to prepare a fresh Naksha Be by providing a water course and a path to the petitioners' land, particularly to Khasra Nos. 2848/1234 and 1235/1. Aggrieved by this order, respondent no.5 filed a revision. The revision was dismissed whereafter the Assistant Collector, Ist Grade, Jaito, CWP No. 12109 of 2007 2 prepared a fresh Naksha Be on 28.12.2004. Respondent no.5 filed an appeal before the Collector, by asserting that the Naksha Be has not been prepared in accordance with directions issued by the Collector, in his order dated 4.4.2001. The Collector accepted the appeal and directed the Assistant Collector, Ist Grade, Jaito, to prepare a fresh Naksha Be, in the light of the earlier order dated 15.7.2003, passed by the Collector. The petitioners thereafter filed an appeal, which was dismissed by the Commissioner. The petitioners, thereafter, filed a revision before the Financial Commissioner, which also met the same fate. I have heard counsel for the parties but am unable to comprehend the petitioners grievance. Vide order dated 15.9.2003, the Collector, accepted the appeal and directed the Assistant Collector, Ist Grade to comply with his earlier directions, issued in favour of the petitioners. The initial order passed in favour of the petitioners by the Collector on 4.4.2001 and by the Commissioner, Faridkot on 27.3.2002, have neither been set aside nor modified by any superior revenue officer. It appears that the writ petition has been filed with the sole object of delaying partition proceedings as, if any person is aggrieved, it is respondent no.5. In view of what has been stated herein above, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. 20.8.2010 ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) GS JUDGE