IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-19063 of 2008 (O/M). Date of Decision : September 16, 2009. Naresh Kumar. ...... Petitioner . Versus. Pawan Kumar and others. ..... Respondents . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. S.K. Redhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the complainant has been able to demonstrate that apart from accused No. 3 Jaswant Singh, other accused persons were also in collusion with him leading to the action which was taken against the petitioner. He on this basis submits that the summoning order of only accused No. 3 Jaswant Singh is not in accordance with law, rather, all the accused persons should have been summoned. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the records of the case. The learned Trial Court has only summoned accused No. 3 Jaswant Singh, after considering in detail the preliminary evidence, which had been led by the complainant (petitioner herein), vide order dated 12.07.2006 (Annexure-P-2). Counsel for the petitioner has taken me through the said order and thereafter this order was challenged by way of criminal revision in the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Rohtak. The said revision petition stood dismissed, vide detailed order dated 13.02.2008 Criminal Misc. No. M-19063 of 2008. (Annexure-P-3) giving reasons and accepting the order of the learned Trial Court as correct. The assertion, which has been made by counsel for the petitioner, had been fully dealt with by the Courts below. The present petition is under Section 482 Cr.P.C., wherein powers after exhaustion of remedy of revisional jurisdiction is further curbed. There is no illegality in the orders impugned in the present petition, which would call for any interference by this Court. Dismissed. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE September 16, 2009. sjks. -2-