(00)" ^fnSjns-^ouisTQ 'jndurejiBg-psL[Bj, '^PIISL[BI aqj, -g/ (03) BfnSjng-^ou^sia 'firegfntreurey 'jaoyjO TBUOTSIAIQ qng aqj, -s^ ('O'O) i3rnS-ins-:tou:tsla '-indvsaJfSQ 5l=>oi9 'qouBdjBg s^i qgnojq^ 'jndospndB^ 'fBAsvpwsd ure-iQ sqj, ••^ jaoyjO SApnoaxg jaiqo s^i L[gnojqi ('O'O) BrnSjns-^sWSTQ '.indure-t^eg '^Aeqotred p^dLrep aqj, •g' ('O'O) BfnS-ing-^u^siQ 'jaoyjo SAT^noaxg jsii-O s^i q§nojq^ jnd^Tqujv 'vaSsvpvcB^ v\}z aqj, 'g "' ('O'O) -indreg '-e^v^j^wayi 'u^Av^qg •g^'a '^uadopASQ {B-iny ig ^BXBqouBd jo ^uaui^jedaQ 'i.[jB§STnBL{q3jo '^AOQ 'Are^sjosg avft qSnojip 'qjeSsi^'eqqo jo a^B^g "l : <-/..i^""'V"" ^^ :-'/ ^.'•w;^^ ^•i>'-> .',•' ig siNaaNOdsaa snsjsA '(03) ^fnSjns-^ouisia 'jndrcrej^g-^oo^g 'irB§TBt[o -s-d 'jndoappd^-a -O/H 'jndoap{idB3[ 'va&evpwsd UTBJQ JO L[3UBcI UOp^dnOOO S.Q 'sjeaA oe ^noqa psgy 'oapurey -o/s 'urejrLquBtj -g^ ^ /^ ^^ /y^ *• .<.^ .^...-c' x'^~%', ^^' <T.Y '(00) ^fngjns-^owsia. 'jnditrej^g-^oo^g 'iirSiBqo -s-d '-indoapiidBa -o/a 'jndo9p{TdB3 'va^evpiuBd UIBJQ jo qoBdJBsdfi uoi^dnooo Ag 'SJBS^ o-t7 ^noqa pagy 'OT3g nq^nqa s^q •o/g 'B;dno p^sBJd PUTAOO •y^: saaNOUIJ.3d T Toe-^^9^ •ON O) NomjLaj IMA andsv^Ia j,v HavosiuLVHHO do tanoo HOIH ca^aNOH SHI NI nrah1 ^ c^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ..-t:a. a ^SS^Jj ^'.. ^ .sS 't,. ^C./A-s- H;.."Ifc.iisii^ mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRfTPETmON (C) No. 3692 of2011 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS Govind Prasad Gupta & Another. VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aodhotri. J. Present: Shri R.S.B^hel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer fortfae State/respondent No.l,5and6. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 13th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counselappearing tor the petiti<»er,on instructiaas, seeks pennission ofthis Court to withAaw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the Colleetor, Surguja, as aecording to the petitioner, fhe construction is bemg raised on the basis of manipulations in the proeeedings ofthe Gram Sabha. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for otherside has no objeetion. 3. It is ordered aecordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as witiidrawn with the afaretasted liberty. However, if aa appUcation/repTeseHtation is made, the Collector, Surguja may consider and decide Ihe same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably wilfain a period of three weeks from tiie date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Annt