( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3711 OF 2010 Vilas Rangnath Hazare and Anr. .. Petitioners Versus Deputy Director, Social Forest Department, .. Respondents Ahmednagar and Anr. Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 16.08.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel. The petitioners are aggrieved by judgment and order dated 26th February, 2010, rendered by the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, whereby their complaint application filed under Section 28 (1) read with Item Nos. 5,6,9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU & PULP Act) came to be dismissed. It is explicit from the rival contentions and record that the petitioners were working in Social Forestry Department. Their employment ( 2 ) was seasonal. They were not appointed on any post. They did not produce any appointment order. They cannot claim continuity in service and benefits like regularization, when it is duly established that the work available with the Social Forestry Department is of seasonal nature. The Apex Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. V/s. Umadevi and Ors., 2006 (2) CLR 261, held that such employees appointed without following recruitment process are not entitled to seek regularization. In this view of the matter, the petition is devoid of substance and as such is dismissed. Still, however, considering long period of seasonal work done by the petitioners, the respondents may provide such seasonal work to them as and when available and on terms of casual employment without any right being created in their favour. The petition is dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/AUG10/wp3711.10