IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2008 SHRI. GIRISH L. RAJADHYAKSHA ... Petitioner Versus MRS. VIBHA GIRISH RAJADHAYAKSHA AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Shambhu Kakodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 8th September, 2008 P.C.: Heard Shri Kakodkar, the learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Both the Courts below have ordered the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 2,500/- per month by way of maintenance allowance. Learned Counsel submits that both the Courts proceeded merely on guesswork in ordering the said payment. Both the Courts have taken note of the fact that the petitioner runs a mill which belongs to his mother. The petitioner also chose not to give evidence to show what was his income. Considering that, the conclusion arrived at by both the Courts below could not be faulted. This is not a fit case for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction. Petition rejected. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH