IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17422 of 2011 PREM CHAND RAM, Son of Late Jiut Ram, resident of village Jag Jiwan Nagar Jaso, P.S. Buxar (M), District Buxar ……. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. U.S.P.Singh, A.P.P. ----- 2 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Petitioner has been granted bail earlier. However, he did not appear for about three years and eventually surrendered in another case on 4.9.2009 and thereafter he has been remanded in this case on 21.11.2009. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is a poor person and has gone outside to earn livelihood and due to communication gap with his Advocate he could not appear in the case. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, PREM CHAND RAM, is directed to be 2 released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J. F.T.C. II, Buxar, in connection with S.Tr. No. 96(A) of 2004 arising out of Buxar Nagar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 29 of 1997, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)