THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2925 of 2011 AND Crl. R.C.No.1687 of 2005 Date: 22.09.2011 Between: Perikala Bhaskara Rao … Petitioner AND 1. Chidipothu Narasimha Rao 2. The State of A.P., rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2925 of 2011 AND Crl. R.C.No.1687 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioner, who is the accused, and the first respondent, who is the de facto complainant, are present. They filed Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2925 of 2011 reporting that they have compounded the offence. I have examined the petitioner and the first respondent. The compounding would appear to be voluntary. Consequently, the compromise is recorded. The offence is compounded. Accordingly, the Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2925 of 2011 is ordered. Consequently, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of recording that the offence is compounded. ________________ K.G. SHANKAR, J Date: 22.09.2011 Isn