THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.23630 of 2010 Dated 28th November, 2011 Between: Sajid Mujtaba Sharief and others …Petitioners And The Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Warangal and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not acquiring the petitioners’ land in Sy.No.735/5 to an extent of Ac.32½ guntas situated at Hanamkonda Village and Mandal, Warangal District as per the Land Acquisition Act and in not paying compensation in respect of the land of the petitioners is highly arbitrary, bad, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to acquire and pay compensation to the land of the petitioners.” At the hearing, it is conceded by Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy learned counsel for the petitioners, that W.P.No.23444 of 2010, in which, identical issues have been raised, was dismissed by this Court with liberty to the petitioners therein to approach the competent civil Court by way of a properly constituted suit. I have perused the said order, in which, it is inter alia observed as under: “In my opinion, the approach of the petitioners is wholly misconceived. This Court, in unequivocal terms, held that the petitioners can only approach the competent Civil Court for compensation. The said order, passed parties inter se, binds the petitioners. Therefore, they cannot once again invoke the jurisdiction of this Court on the basis of a purported new cause of action, namely, the findings contained in the report of the Survey Department. As directed by this Court, the petitioners can only avail their remedy before the Civil Court, in a properly constituted suit, in which the survey report can also be relied upon to substantiate their claim.” Inasmuch as the relief claimed in this writ petition is identical to that claimed in W.P.No.23444 of 2010, this writ petition is also dismissed in terms of the order therein with liberty to the petitioners to approach the civil Court by way of a suit. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.30247 of 2010 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 28th November, 2011 VGB