THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A. No.133 of 2001 JUDGMENT: The appellants are defendants in O.S.No.245 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District. The respondents herein filed the suit for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. They have also filed I.A.No.2938 of 2000 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. The trial Court passed an order of ad-interim injunction on 30.12.2000. This appeal is filed against the said order. Several contentions were urged including the one that the trial oCourt did not record the reasons while dispensing with notice contemplated under Rules 1 and 2 of Order 39 C.P.C. Submissions were also made on merits. Heard Sri S.A.K.S.Reddeiah, the learned counsel representing Sri B.Venkat Rama Rao, the learned counsel for the appellants. The necessity for this Court to examine the matter on merits is obviated on account of two developments. The first is that the order passed by the trial Court was suspended by this Court way back in the year 2001 and the second is that the suit itself is said to have been dismissed as not pressed on 12.06.2001. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:21.08.2009 kdl