IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No. 976 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 30, 2011 Rishi Pal Aggarwal ...Appellant Versus H.V.P.N. Ltd. and others ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE M HON'BLE M HON'BLE M HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE . JUSTICE . JUSTICE . JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Munish Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. M.M. KUMAR, J. M.M. KUMAR, J. M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent has been preferred by a retired employee of the H.V.P.N. Ltd. claiming that second ACP has not been granted to him. Learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by holding that the second ACP has already been granted to the petitioner by giving him notional benefit w.e.f. 1.1.1996 in accordance with the rules from the year 2004. Even the pension of the appellant has been accordingly fixed. In fact, the claim of the appellant is for payment of arrears of salary from 1.1.1996 till the date of his retirement which the learned Single Judge has not adverted to because the writ petition has been filed in the year 2011. The benefit of second ACP has already been notionally granted w.e.f. 1.1.1996 and even pension of the appellant has been accordingly re-fixed. Therefore, we are of the view that no interference of the Letters Patent Bench would be warranted. The appeal does not merit admission. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) (M.M. KUMAR) (M.M. KUMAR) (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH) May May May May 30 30 30 30, 2011 , 2011 , 2011 , 2011 JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Pkapoor