THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6533 of 2004 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner, who is the judgment-debtor in E.P.No.42 of 2002 in O.S.No.84 of 2000, filed this revision under Section 115 C.P.C., assailing the order of arrest, dated 01.11.2004, passed by the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Pakala in E.P.No.42 of 2002 in O.S.No.84 of 2000. Though several contentions are sought to be urged, however, it is seen that the executing Court after holding enquiry, wherein both sides let in their evidence, having found that in spite of having sufficient means, the petitioner is not paying the decretal amount, ordered arrest of the petitioner. Having regard to the finding arrived at by the executing Court on the basis of the evidence, there is no justification to vary with the same and hence, the revision petition is liable to be dismissed. At this stage, it is pertinent to note that on 27.12.2004 while admitting the civil revision petition, this Court granted interim stay, on condition of the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.40,000/-. It is made clear that in case the condition is not complied with, the petitioner shall deposit the entire amount or in case of compliance, he shall deposit the balance amount, within four (4) weeks from today. On such deposit, the respondent shall be entitled to withdraw the same, without furnishing any security. Subject to the above direction, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J Dated: 22.07.2010 kdl