CW 533/2010 Pooran Chand Vs. The Raj. Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur & Ors. (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.533/2010 Pooran Chand Sharma Vs. The Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur and others Date Of Order :: 25.1.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya, for petitioner. .......... This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 19/11/2009 passed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate, Rajasthan, Jaipur in Appeal No.1530/2009 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against his transfer order dated 21/10/2009 has been dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the point of admission and perused the material placed on record. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that he was appointed as work charge employee in the forest department and his services have been given to the Panchayati Raj Department but he has not yet been absorbed by the said department, therefore, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department has no jurisdiction to further transfer him from the place of posting for which he was given to the Panchayati Raj CW 533/2010 Pooran Chand Vs. The Raj. Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur & Ors. (2) Department. I have considered the above submissions. It is not disputed that services of petitioner had been given by the forest department to the Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department and accordingly the petitioner was relieved by the Regional Forest Officer for his posting as a Secretary, Gram Panchayat vide order dated 2/5/2001 and since then he was working in that capacity and now after a period of about more than eight years the petitioner has been transferred from Laxmangarh, Sikar to Gangapurcity. In my considered view Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department is fully empowered to take the services of the petitioner at any place where it is required. It is settled proposition of law that for the administrative reasons the competent authority can transfer its employee at any place within its domain. The government servant holding a transferable post has no vested right to remain posted at one place or the other except where it appears that transfer is by violating mandatory statutory rule or on account of some melafides. I do not find any good reason to interfere with the transfer order of the petitioner issued by the Deputy Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur on 21/10/2009. Consequently, this writ petition, being devoid of any force, is hereby dismissed. (J.R. Goyal),J VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D12