CRP 440/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.D.AGARWAL This revision application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read wi th Section 115 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by one Sant i Namasudra challenging the order dated 5.11.2009 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhubri in MAC(T) Case No. 548 of 2006 . Heard Shri M Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.Chakraborty , learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3. The controversy relates to the estate of late Kanai Namasudra. The petitioner he rein is claiming that she is the legally wedded wife of the deceased whereas Smt i Mamata Namasudra and Jhunkibala Namasudra are claiming themselves as wife and mother of the deceased respectively. By the impugned order the tribunal has ordered that the prayer of the petitioner to implead her in the case would be considered after recording proper evidence ascertaining her status as wife of the deceased. In my considered opinion, any f ining with regard to the status of the petitioner vis-a-vis the respondent No.2 can be rendered after hearing the concerned parties and this can only be done a fter impleading the petitioner Smti Santi Namasudra as opposite party in MAC Ca se No.548/2006. Hence, the tribunal is directed to implead Shanti Namasudra as one of the opposi te parties in the said petition and decide the case in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions revision application stands disposed of. It is made clear that for the time being the interim amount of Rs.50,000/- (fift y thousand) may be granted/disbursed to the original claimant(s).