IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MPM No. 1278 of 2010. Decided on: November 26, 2010 Raghubir Singh Thakur …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ...Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petitioner is an employee of a Hydro Power Project, being commissioned in Chamba District. SDM, Tissa, was found to be carrying cash of `11,90,000/- on 11th February, 2010, in a vehicle, while going towards his native place in Kangra District. Police apprehends that the cash was given to the said SDM by the petitioner, as representative of the Project, he has been employed by. So far, no case has been registered against the petitioner. Investigating Agency intends to interrogate him. 3. Since no case has been registered against the present petitioner so far, the present petition is dismissed. Petitioner is, however, directed to join investigation and to make himself available to the investigating agency, for interrogation, as, when and where called upon, by the said Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - agency, to do so. In case during the course of interrogation, the investigating agency books him as an accused in the case and intends to arrest him, he shall be given three days advance notice to enable him to approach the Sessions Court or this Court for grant of bail, before arrest. Petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. November 26, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J