IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6369 of 2008 1. Ashok Kumar Singh son of Shri Siya Ram Singh, Resident of village Yadavpur, Post Mahuwan, District Bhojpur. 2. Anil Kumar Singh, Son of Shri Sheo Karan Singh, Resident of village C.K. Road Ara, District Bhojpur. 3. Sidheshwar Singh Son of Shri Ram Gati Singh, Resident of village Deoki Singh Ke Tola, Post Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur. 4. Santosh Kumar Singh, son of Shri Suresh Singh, Resident of village Khalisa, Post Karawan, District Bhojpur 5. Udai Kumar Singh, son of Shri Bishundeo Singh. 6. Prem Kumar Singh son of Shri Shri Ram Singh, Both 5 and 6 resident of village Mathwalia, Post Daulatpur, District Bhojpur. 7. Surendra Kumar son of Shri Ram Singh, resident of village – Post Ekwana, District Bhojpur. 8. Dilip Kumar Singh son of Dinesh Singh, Resident of village Yadavpur, Post Mahuwan, District Bhojpur. 9. Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Sri Kedar Nath Singh, Resident of Club Road near D.M. Residence, Ara (Bhojpur). 10. Uday Kumar Singh Son of Shri Anugrah Narayan Singh, Resident of Karman Tola, P.O. Arrah, District Arrah (Bhojpur). 11. Anil Kumar Singh, son of Sri Yamuna Singh, Resident of village Mohanpur Karja, P.O. Barahara, District Bhojpur….Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Deputy Director, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Vice Chancellor, Vir Kuer Singh University, Arrah. 7. The Registrar, Vir Kuer Singh University, Arrah. 8. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya. 9. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh- Gaya. 2 10. The Principal, Maharaja College, Arrah………………………………………………………………Respondents ---------------------------------- 3 16.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Sub Committee of the Syndicate had made some recommendation in respect of the petitioners and the same was considered by the Syndicate and the matter has been referred to the State Government in terms of the resolution of the Syndicate dated 24.02.1998. However, he submits that till date no final decision has been taken in the matter of regularisation of services of petitioners. He submits that petitioners may be given opportunity to file a representation requesting the Vice Chancellor to take a final decision in the matter, either way. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the Vice Chancellor of the University with prayer to take a final decision in the matter of regularisation of 3 their services. If they file such a representation, the Vice Chancellor of the University shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)