IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2007 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 34988 of 2007(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- PRISCA JOSEPH (MINOR), CHITTILAPPILLY HOUSE, THAIKKATTUSSERY P.O., OLLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN-680 322, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER C.A.JOSEPH. BY ADV. SRI.N.J.JOHNSON RESPONDENTS: ------------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, OLLUR BRANCH, OLLUR, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC, SBT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 34988 OF 2007 M ===================== Dated this the 7th day of December, 2007 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the 2nd respondent to sanction the education loan to the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P3. 2. Standing counsel for the 1st respondent entered appearance on notice and submits that the only issue that requires to be clarified is whether the course, which is now undergone by the petitioner and the particular institute, has the approval of the UGC/GOVT/AICTE/AIBMS/ICMR etc. When the submission was made, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner pointed out that the very same Bank has already given loan to three students, who are undergoing course along with the petitioner. Be that as it may, the Bank is always entitled to ask for clarification for its satisfaction that the course imparted has the necessary approval or not. 3. Now that the area of controversy has boiled down to the issue of recognition alone, I direct that if the petitioner have documents to prove that the course and institute where they are WPC 34988/07 :2 : now undergoing training has the necessary approval as indicated, it is open to the petitioner to produce such documents before the 2nd respondent. In such a case, the 2nd respondent shall certainly take into account such documents. On that basis, the application made by the petitioner shall be considered. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp