(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.462 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.186 OF 2005 Kishore Shyamji Meharia ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra....Respondent Mr. Kapil Dave for the Applicant Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATED: 5TH JUNE 2008 DATED: 5TH JUNE 2008 DATED: 5TH JUNE 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The Applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C. by judgment dated 18th January, 2005. During the course of the trial bail was not granted to the Applicant. 2. This is an application for bail moved after three years from the date of the judgment of the learned Sessions Court. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the Applicant that this is a fit case for grant of bail considering the evidence on record that the benefit of doubt should be given to the accused. We are considering an application for bail on the findings recorded by the Trial Court. Prima facie there are two eye witnesses whose evidence has been accepted. Once that be the case, (-2-) and the incident took place in the house where the witnesses were present, in these circumstances in our opinion no case is made out to grant bail. Hence application for bail rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)