IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16367 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR RAJAK, SON OF SRI HIRA LAL RAJAK, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA & P.S. ADAMPUR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR. -------- PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILANCE ------ OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 06.01.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 29.3.2010 passed by Special Judge, Vigilance (Trap), Patna, in Special Case No. 22 of 2007 by which he has rejected the application of the petitioner for supply of additional papers. The petitioner submits that the trial court has held that only the First Information Report, post trap, F.S.L. report, charge sheet, sanction order are the only necessary documents but these documents are not sufficient documents which would enable him to face the trial. Since Section 207 enjoins only supply of those documents submitted in the court along with the Police Report which the prosecution proposes to rely upon obviously there is no need for any additional documents to be supplied to the accused. This legal position has not been controverted by the Senior Counsel for the Vigilance. It is made clear that no document which has not been supplied to the accused person shall be allowed to be proved by the prosecution even for purposes of charge since it will hamper the interest of the accused. 2 In view of such, finding no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)