@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH (1% WRIT PETITION N0. 3843 ___________ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION OE INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OE APPROPRIATE ORDER(S)/DIRECTION(S) _ Anil Rice Industries, Through its proprietor, ‘n \ Anjl Kumar Galg, Y S/o Lats Jagdish Pd. Garg, about 42 Aged years, R/o—Village & P.O. Mopka, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) PETITIONERS VERSUS Union of India, Through its Secretary, I? Deptt. of Consupmar Affairs, Food 2/; & Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan, $9? $2” New Delhi. <35?Q e» <2 Mr ‘2 State of Chhattisgarh, , Through the Secretary, Deptt. of Food and Civil Supplies, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. Hood Corporation of India, Corporation klihr ugh its Managing Director, He d Quarter-FCI -20 Sarakharba Lane, New Delhi. ’ AI. The Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office Raipur, {WK Distt. Raipur, C.G. 1‘ 55.. The District Manager, F.C.I. Bilaspur, k O Chhattisgarh. Qo‘ RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR R WRIT PETITION N0. 3843 of 2003 PETITIONFR. : Ani] Rice Industries. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Union oflndia & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \4A SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A nihotri J. Present: None for thepetitioner. Shri R.K.Pali, Advocate appearing on behalf of Smt.Fouzia Mirza, Assistant Solicitor General for the Union oflndia. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1 Shri Prashant Jayaswal, Senior Advocate with Shri SaifKhan, Advocate for the respondent No. 3 to 5. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 30 day of November, 2010) The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. ‘ Consequently, interim relief granted earlier is discharged 1/. / / ,,¢/V \ \ ‘ sw- Judge l, i sa‘tish K~ WWW: