1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 166 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 83 OF 2009 Mrs. Bhavana Sudhir Pashankar. .. ... Applicant. Versus Sudhir D. Pashankar. ... ... Respondent. Ms. Tanmayee Gadre i/by Mr. N. P. Deshpande for the Applicant. Mr.Manoj Patil i/by Mr. A. B. Vagyani for the Respondent. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR and A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 29TH JUNE, 2010. P. C.: Learned Counsel for the respondent husband on instruction states that the respondent has no objection to allow the applicant wife to use the electrical gadgets and paint the room as desired by her considering the fact that the applicant is residing in the same premises. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 4(a). 2. We make it clear that the expenses towards the electricity charges due to usage of the proposed electrical appliances to be installed hereafter shall be borne by the respondent husband upto Rs.500/- p.m. If the electricity bill due to usage 2 of the said appliances exceeds Rs.500/- per month, the applicant wife shall be liable to pay the same. Sd/- Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)