1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.175 of 2006 Narendra Ketshi HUF & 2 Ors. .. Petitioners Vs Taraben Jamnadas and Anr. .. Respondents. Mr S.V.Marwadi with Mr Ramesh Jain, for the petitioners. Mr K.R. Iyangar, for respondent no.1. Mr A.S.Shitole, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 7th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 7th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 7th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Respondent waives service. By consent, rule is heard forthwith. 2. This petition is directed against the order passed in the revision application by which the order of the larned Magistrate to recall the complainant PW 1, has been revoked. The application under section 311 of Cr.P.C seeking recall of the complainant was allowed by the learned Magistrate and that order was carried in revision application. 3. I heard the learned counsel for the parties for some time. Both the learned counsel have fairly 2 2 2 stated that I need not record reasons and both have agreed for the following order. (i) The petitioner-accused will complete the cross-examination of PW 2 and therafter he will be allowed to further cross-examine PW 1. (ii) The learned Magistrate to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. (iii) The writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)