IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 R.P.No. 1118 OF 2008(L) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.23842/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S):PETITIONERS IN R.P - RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN WP ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ARABIYODA KASMIKOYA, BLOCK NO.2, AGATHI ISLAND U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. 2. ARABIYODA ABDUL JABBAR, REVENUE INSPECTOR, AGATHI ISLAND, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 3 TO 11 IN WP ------------------------------------------------------ 1. KEEPAD ACHRIYODA MEPPADAILLAM ISOMMABI, AGATHI ISLAND, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. 2. THALAKKADA MUMTAZ, AGATHI ISLAND, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. 3. KEEPAD ACHRIYODA MEPPADAILLAM ANWAR SADIQ, AGATHI ISLAND, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. (RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 REPRESENTED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KEEPAD ACHRIYODA MEPPADAILLAM ABDUL KALAM AZAD, AS IN THE COURT BELOW). 4. ARABIYODA ABOOBACKER KOYA, GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. 5. ARABIYODA AMINA BEEGAM, LIBRARY ATTENDER BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. (...2/-) RP1118/08 IN WP(C)23842/08 ::2:: 6. ARABIYODA AYISHA BEEGAM, HOUSE WIFE, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. 7. ARABIYODA SUBAIDABI, HOUSE WIFE, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. 8. ARABIYODA ABDUL MAFEED, AGRICULTURIST, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. 9. KEELAPURAM SHAMSHAD BEEGAM, HOUSE WIFE, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. 10. KEELAPURAM SHAMNA BEEGAM, HOUSE WIFE, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. 11. KEELAPURAM FAREESU (MINOR), STUDENT, BLOCK NO.II, AGATHI ISLAND. 12. KEELAPURAM SAFAR (MINOR), STUDENT, BLOCK II, AGATHI ISLAND. BY ADV. K.K. MOHAMMED RAVUF FOR R1-3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P. NO. 1118 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO.23842 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 O R D E R This petition is filed to review the judgment dated 7.8.2008, passed without hearing the petitioners, who were respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition. The case of the petitioners is that Ext.P8 order in Ext.P7 petition should not have been set aside to grant an opportunity to the writ petitioners to file objections. Learned counsel appearing for writ petitioners opposed the application contending that Ext.P8 order was passed without affording an opportunity to file objections on the date of posting itself. 2. On hearing the learned counsel I do not find any apparent error or other reason warranting review of the judgment. As per the judgment, this Court directed District Judge to afford an opportunity to the writ petitioners to file objections and thereafter pass appropriate order in I.A. 6 of 2008. Review petitioners are entitled to raise their contentions before the learned District Judge. RP1118/08 in WP(C)23842/08 2 3. Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners then submitted that there is no District Judge at present and in such circumstances it is not possible to pass an order in I.A.6 of 2008 immediately and meanwhile based on the judgment writ petitioners are taking steps to cancel the ration card and disconnect electricity. In view of the submission it is made clear that no action is to be taken based on the judgment dated 7.8.2008, till a final order is passed in I.A.6 of 2008 by the District Judge. If the District Judge takes charge, orders in I.A.6 of 2008 shall be passed without delay. M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE Okb/-