IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18472 of 2009 1. RADHA KUMARI D/O SRI RAM NATH YADAV, R/O VILL- SIMRAHA, P.S- MARAUNA, DISTT- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPRTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SUPAUL, DISTT- SUPAUL 3. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MARAUNA BLOCK, DISTT- SUPAUL 4. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, MARAUNA BLOCK, DISTT- SUPAUL 5. HEAD MASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL, PANCHGACHHIYA P.S- MARAUNA, DISTT- SUPAUL 6. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BARHARA, BLOCK – MARAUNA, POLICE STATION – MARAUNA, DISTRICT – SUPAUL. ----------- 02/ 27.04.2010 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Barhara as respondent no. 6. Petitioner’s grievance is that despite an order passed by the D.S.E., Supaul directing the concerned authorities to allow the petitioner to sign attendance register and treating her appointment as a legal appointment, she is not being paid her salary. The petitioner was earlier restrained from signing the attendance register, as such she filed CWJC No. 2593 of 2009. During the pendency of the writ application by the order of D.S.E. vide letter no. 663 dated 11.5.2009 she started signing the attendance register and discharging her duties, but she is not being paid her salary. Nowhere in the writ application the petitioner has mentioned that on account of non-payment of salary she has - 2 - approach the concerned Mukhiya/Panchayat Secretary of the Gram Panchayat and the Block Education Extension Officer, Marauna. Without exhausting the remedy available to the petitioner she has filed the present writ application. This application is being disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to move before the appropriate forum for redressal of her grievance. In case of filing of such representation by the petitioner, the respondents-authorities will consider her claim for payment of salary. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)