IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 18030 of 2004 Between: Bandi Govindamma, W/o. Papaiah, Kotaravariveedhi, Bapatla, Guntur Dsitrict. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla P.S., Bapatla, Guntur District. 2 The Stateion House Officer, Bapatla Town Police Station, Bapatla Town, Guntur District. 3 Bandi Chenenu Madhavi, W/o. Srinivas Nehru, S.C. Madiga, Vijayalakshmipuram, Bapatla, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 & 2 in conducting the investigation in a perfunctory manner as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 in to file additional charge sheet by conducting the investigation in a fair manner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following at the admission stage: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. __________________ (V.ESWARAIAH, J.) 26.4.2005 kpr To 1 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla P.S., Bapatla, Guntur District. 2 The Stateion House Officer, Bapatla Town Police Station, Bapatla Town, Guntur District. 3 2 cc to the Govt. Pleader for Home, High Court buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2 C.D copies