^ ^ c'syRl s: BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P(S)No. ^,/;. of 2011 ~7V PETITIONER •^•' RESPONDENTS / '*"y ^^^ ^yy PVX' ^^ »•'' Rameshwar Kosma, aged about 50 years, S/o Late Shri Budhram, Headmaster, posted at Government Middle School, Munjal Patharra, Block- Chhuriya, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS ^ :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of Sehool Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block- Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. ^\ fi '-<& \ ^. '"i^ ^ <-^ ^ •s HIGH COURTOFCHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0.26 OF 2011 Versus Rameshwar Kosma State of Chhattisgarh & Others Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shrl Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on thls 6 day of January, 2011) 1. T'ne petitloner was initially appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After completion of the probation period, the petitioner was granted reguiar pay scate. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in the case is asto whether, the petltioner is entiiled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the tiate of initial appointment or after completlon of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administratlve Tribunai, Jabaiour In O.A. No. 2745/89 Yadu ano' 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similariy situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petltion (Civi!) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitied to regular pay scale from date of init'ial appointment. -x9 -'*^———— ~,\ 3& ^ ,-ri-'1-"' •? . 4. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner also submits that thls court, whiie considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. State of Chhattssgarh & others [W.P. (S) No.4725/2006] by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising a!l their grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petltioner is granted liberty to make a reoresentation raising ali the grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, If any, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its ovrfn merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification ofthe facts. 6. !n yiew of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. ssriOK Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge