Crl.M.No.M-23876 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-23876 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 16, 2010 Parveen Kumar .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.255, dated 7.7.2010, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506, 452, 294 IPC, at Police Station Nissing, Karnal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 25.8.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.42483 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-23876 of 2010 Argues that parties are closely related and that in fact dispute is between two real brothers over construction of staircase. Further argues that petitioner is in possession of first floor of adjoining house of the complainant. Further contends that parents of present petitioner also sustained injuries vide MLR Annexures P2 and P3. Further contends that only simple injuries have been received by the complainant. Further argues that petitioner is employed in Indo Tibetans Border Police Crl.M.No.M-23876 of 2010 (O&M) -2- (ITBP) and that he was not present at the time of occurrence and that he has been falsely implicated just on vague allegations. Notice of motion for 16.9.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 25.8.2010, granting interim bail to petitioner-Parveen Kumar, is, hereby made absolute subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 16.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge