THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.2100 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 29.01.2010 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, dismissing I.A.No.204 of 2009 in O.P.No.821 of 2005 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act (for short ‘the Act’) read with Section 151 CPC seeking to condone the delay of 1108 days in filing the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in the said O.P. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. 3. The above said O.P. was filed by the respondent-wife for restitution of conjugal rights. As the said O.P., was decreed ex parte on 04.05.2006, the petitioner-husband filed a petition under Section 5 of the Act seeking to condone the delay of 593 days in filing the petition to set aside the said ex parte decree and the same was dismissed. The revision filed by him against the said dismissal order is pending before this Court. He again filed the present I.A. seeking condonation of delay of 1108 days in filing the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in the said O.P. The Court below observing that the petitioner having received the notice in the O.P., remained ex parte and ex parte decree was passed on 04.05.2006 and that he has not explained day-to-day delay, dismissed the said petition. Hence, this revision. 4. It is to be noticed that the petitioner has not explained the inordinate delay of 1108 days in filing the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in the O.P., properly. In view of the same, I am not inclined to grant any relief in this revision. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:11.06.2010 sj