IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 18101-CII of 2009 and CR No. 4247 of 2009 Date of Decision: 6.8.2009 Smt. Surjabati ....Petitioner. Versus Smt. Ruby Devi ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. C.M. No. 18101-CII of 2009 This is an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for placing on record zimni orders as Annexures P-2 to P-8. Annexures P-2 to P-8 filed along with the application are taken on record. CM stands disposed of accordingly. C.R. No. 4247 of 2009 In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the order dated 29.4.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Faridabad, whereby the evidence of the plaintiff-petitioner has been closed by the order of the Court. C.R. No. 4247 of 2009 -2- Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the interest of justice, one opportunity may be granted to the petitioner to lead her entire evidence and the respondent can be compensated by way of costs. He further submits that the petitioner will conclude her entire evidence at her own risk and responsibility on 25.8.2009, the date already fixed before the trial court. Ordinarily, I would have issued notice of motion to the respondent but as the issuance of notice would prolong the case and entail unnecessary expenses to her, the present petition is being disposed of without resorting to that course. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and in the facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is satisfied that in the interest of justice the petitioner deserves to be granted one opportunity to conclude her entire evidence. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall be granted one opportunity to lead her entire evidence on 25.8.2009, the date already fixed before the trial Court at her own risk and responsibility and subject to payment of Rs.3,000/- to the respondent as costs. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner fails to conclude her entire evidence on the said date or to pay the costs, as stipulated above, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. August 6, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE