1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8453 of 2011 Mahadevan, S/o. Mahali Reddiar, Hereditary Administrator, Arulmigu Bathirakaliyamman & Arulmigu Marriyamman Thirukovil, Naduppatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. ...Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Superintendent of Police Tiruchirappalli District,Tiruchirappalli . 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai Sub-Division, Tiruchirappalli District. 3. Rethinam 4. Ponnan 5. Ramasamy 6. Arumugagounder 7. Rajagopal 8. Veerasamy 9. Thakkamalai ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide Police protection to the Kumbabhisegam function on 15.07.2011 to be held at Arulmigu Bathirakaliyamman and Arulmigu Marriyamman Thirukovil, Naduppatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District and for the other related Poojas on 14.07.2011 as per the representation made by the petitioner dated: 04.07.2011. For Petitioner :Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents :Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side)for R1 & R2. :Mr.N.Mohan for R3 to R9 O R D E R The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide Police protection to the Kumbabhisegam function on 15.07.2011 to be held at Arulmigu Bathirakaliyamman and Arulmigu Marriyamman Thirukovil, Naduppatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District and for the other related Poojas on 14.07.2011 as per the representation made by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents 3 to 9 would submit that the petitioner's father has received the amount from the villagers for the purpose of Kumbabhisegam and the said amount has been used to purchase the property in the name of his son and not used for the celebration of the Kumbabhisegam. Hence, the respondents 3 to 9 are shown their protest. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 9 would fairly conceded that they are also ready to co-operate for celebration of Kumbahisegam festival to be held on 15.07.2011. 4.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submits that he gave a representation on 04.07.2011, for providing police protection for the celebration of Kumbahisegam festival to be held on 15.07.2011 at Arulmigu Bathirakaliyamman and Arulmigu Marriyamman Thirukovil, Naduppatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 5.Heard both sides. 6.Considering the rival submissions on either side, since the Kumbabhisegam is to be held on 15.07.2011, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.07.2011 and provide adequate police protection to the Kumbabhisegan function to be held on 15.07.2011 at Arulmigu Bathirakaliyamman and Arulmigu Marriyamman Thirukovil, Naduppatti Village, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District and for the other related Poojas on 14.07.2011. 7. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. SD ASST REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR gsr To 1. The Superintendent of Police Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli . 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai Sub-Division, Tiruchirappalli District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 1CC TO MR. T.M. MAADASAMY, ADVOCATE, SR: 22907: DM::2011:JULY::14:: Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8453 of 2011 14.07.2011 2P:5C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/