IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42621 of 2010 MAHENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 17.03.2011. Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and considering the fact of call records made from the looted mobile set by the petitioner and his own confession which is the basis for his implication which goes to show that the cellular phone was belonging to his son who was a bad character, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in Paliganj P.S.Case No.66 of 2010. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)