1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6180/2004. : : Kamla Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : : Date of Order 21.8.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Dheeraj Kalmania for Mr.Ashvin Garg for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Sharma, Govt.Counsel for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.7.2004 whereby under the instruction of Government the District Collector, Tonk directed for convening the meeting of Gram Sabha for considering the representation of the respondent No.6 Sumitra Devi with further direction that Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Todaraisingh and Child Project Development Officer, Todaraisingh shall remain present in such meeting. The petitioner was appointed in place of the vacancy by removal of respondent No.6 from the post of Angan Badi Karyakarta. The respondent No.6 Sumitra Devi filed writ petition before this Court as SB Civil Writ Petition 2 No.6575/2002 which was decided by this Court vide order dated 9.10.2003 with liberty to her to make a representation to the Government. It was pursuant to such representation that the meeting of Gram Sabha was ordered to be reconvened Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that earlier the respondent No.6 was working but her performance was not satisfactory as Angan Badi Karyakarta, therefore, she was removed. The Gram Panchayat notified the vacancies and the petitioner and respondent No.6 both applied and on the recommendation made through resolution of the Gram Panchayat, the petitioner was given appointment on that post, therefore, there was no reconsideration. The writ petition was filed way back in 2004 challenging the decision of the order of District Collector dated 28.7.2004 for reconvening the meeting of Gram Panchayat. Nothing has been brought on record about the subsequent developments regarding the meeting of Gram Panchayat where two officials were nominated and decision was taken pursuant to representation was made by the respondent No.6. This Court in SB Civil Writ Petition No..6575/2002 had permitted to respondent No.6 to make such representation and directed the District Collector to decide the same. 3 I do not find any infirmity in the order dated 28.7.2004 of District Collector, Tonk in reconvening the meeting of Gram Sabha. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/-