-3-^ ce> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) No. S33^ /2009 t' 9. PETITIONER ^ ^vx5"^.Bh< .^^^^^•" ^' w'>t"'u. ^e^8u.^--"°1^" ^A--'"" Prabhat Tiwari S/o. Ramesh Kumar Tiwori, oged obout 37 years, Occupotion Government Service, Presently posted QS Constable, Police Stotion PQndariyo, District Kabirdham (C.G.), Versus RESPONDENTS ap 2:^' ^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Home (Police), D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Generol of Police, Police hleod Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Superintendent of Police, Bijapur, District Bijapur (C.G.), 4. The Inspector General of Police, Jogdolpur Circle, Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT fS)/ ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARY ETC. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION CS) No. 5394 of2009 ^nN^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Prabhat Tiwail. VERSUS : The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRFT PETmON LWDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITLTION OF INTDIA SB: Hon'ble Shn Satish K. Agmhotn, J, Present: Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Slm P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 22nd day of September, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that against the order dated 19th May, 2008 (Annexure P/l) which is impugned herein, the petitioner has also preferred an appeal before the Inspector General of Police, Jagdalpur, Bastar on 20th Januar^7, 2009. Thus, this petition for a direction to the appellate authority to consider and decide the appeal within the stipulated time as the appeal is pending consideration for the last eight months. 2. Be that as it may- law is well settled that if an appeal agamst an order is pending consideration, a writ petition is not maintamable against the same order \vhich is sought to be challenged in the appeal. The petitioner may make a application before the appellate authority to consider and decide his appeal expeditiously. 3. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disniissed. Sd/- . _ SatishK.Agl»bnt" Judge Ainit