m^ \ o 6 ^ i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.N0.3S'7C>/ 2005 Petitioner Versus Respondents ,<J; ^"'J?" ''.y^ ^~/-^/// .y/~ syM/ ..•/^v// .<^?/ 'y<! ^y ^^1?^ ^ ^—^•^J^ ? ^}^ 4. 5. M.K.Prakash Rao S/o Late M.V.Appa Rao, Aged about 61 years, R/o Yamuna Vihar, N.T.P.C. Colony, Korba, Dist: Korba-(C.G.) Rail India Technical Economic Services Limited (A government oflndia Undertaking) represented by Gsneral Manager, 27, Bara Khamba Road, New Delhi The General Manager, South Eastem Railway, Garden Reach, Calcutta The Divisional Railway Manager, East Coast Railway, Vishakapatiaam (A.P.) The Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastem Central Railway, Bilaspur-(C.G.) The Railway Board Represented by its Secretary, New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 2270FLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^' XI-HC-78 HI*1rtim<TT^ Vfcnc|^|^|0<l, tP-a1^<l<S, (qcOI^-l^ „„.^:.f.:.. ^Ft200 3H^TcOTR?li<t> ^PTT3TI^^Tri»^J<b g,-^ ^ 3TI^$T q^c|?(4c|f^<s|<g) <PI<ll0<0<rl ^I*1oT^fel<lx^<;K ^arf^Tsn^T 12/09/2005:- Mr. P.R. Patankar* learney counsel for the petitionor. Leamed counsel app^lring for the petitioner submits that the petiti<»nerwants to withdraw thts writ petltion wlth l|berty to teke approprtate steps forappropriate|reHef. The writ petition is ^jsmissed as wittidrawn wfth liberfy to teik^ appropriate steps for appropriate remedy. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge ^ ^