( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3937 OF 1996 Shankarrao s/o. Bhujangrao Chinchalkar and ors.. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. R.K. Ladda, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Shri V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for respondent No.6. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 24.09.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for the petitioner, A.G.P. Mrs. R.K. Ladda for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and Shri V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for respondent No.6. 2. Adv. Shri Hon pointed out para 4 of the additional affidavit, filed by the petitioners on 03.08.2009. Said paragraph is as follows:- “I say that the Gram Panchayat of Bhokar has also passed resolution in its Gram Sabha held on 22.4.1997 resolving to permit the CL-III shops from ( 2 ) conducting its business. I say that during pendency of the writ petition there are two more CL-III licences were permitted to do the business at Bhokar. I say that the Gram Panchayat has also issued no objection certificate to the shops during pendency of the petition. The No objection certificate is dated 2.6.2008. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “R-2” is the copy of no objection certificate. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “R-3” are the copies of two new licences issued by the Excise department.” (sic) 3. The petitioners have also annexed Exhibits “R-2” and “R-3” to substantiate their say. In view of this change of circumstances, this Court directs respondent No.4 – Collector, to review his order dated 09.08.1996. The petitioners and respondent No.6 are directed to appear before the Collector on 01.12.2009. 4. In the meantime, interim order to continue till decision by the Collector on review. 5. With these observations the petition stands disposed of. Rule discharged. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/SEP09/wp3937.96