1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6524 OF 2009 Smt. Manjula Babu Dhondi & ors........ Petitioner versus Homeland Relators Pvt. Ltd. ........Respondent. Mr. J.G. Damani adv. for the Petitioners Mr. Anil Singh i/b. D.R. Shah adv. for the Respondent no.1. CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 25th November, 2009. P. C.: 1. Petitioners are original plaintiffs who instituted a suit against the defendant claiming relief of declaration that the agreement dated 8-9-1986 is no longer valid and stands revoked/ canceled and not binding on the plaintiff. Suit property is described as a land bearing survey No. 21, Hissa No. 3, CTS no. 561 ad measuring about 5 guntas. In the said pending suit, the respondents 1 and 2 moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 seeking their impleadment as party defendant in the suit by contending that they are the owners of the suit property. Perusal of the application would reveals the manner in which the applicant claims to have derived the title to the property, and the CTS No.561 is purportedly purchased by the applicants. As the 2 trial court found that the presence of the applicants would be very much necessary for complete adjudication of the issues, it had permitted impleadment of the applicants as party defendant in the suit. According to the applicants/respondent no.1 and 2 the suit filed by the plaintiff is a collusive suit and the relief claimed thereunder would adversely affect and prejudice the applicants. Taking over all view of the matter and being prima facie satisfied that the applicants do have title/interest in the suit property, the trial court has allowed the application. 2. Perused the order. The same does not suffer from any illegality or impropriety warranting any interference at the hands of this court in exercise of 227 jurisdiction. In the result writ petition is summarily dismissed. (A. P. Deshpande, J.)