IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18494 of 2008 MD. IRFAN AHMAD @ S. IRFAN AHMAD ….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ……………. Respondents. ----------- 2. 21.01.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that jurisdiction in the authority ordering suspension is not lacking. The fact that the provision of law quoted in the order of suspension may be wrong is not material when learned counsel himself acknowledges that the provisions for suspension are there in the Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005. There is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the order of suspension. Let the departmental proceedings against the petitioner be completed within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and / or production of a copy of this order, provided the petitioner himself cooperates. If the departmental proceedings are not concluded within the aforesaid period of four months, for no fault of the petitioner, the order of suspension shall stand revoked on the expiry of the said period when the departmental proceedings may continue but shall be concluded expeditiously. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. dk ( Navin Sinha, J. )