IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14146 of 2009 Between: V. Sattaiah S/o. Late V. Venkat Ramulu R/o. Chintapally, Nalgonda District. Presently Residing at Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Reptd. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad at Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 3 The Station House Officer Rajendra Nagar Police Station Cyberabad. 4 The Station House Officer Chintapally Police Station Nalgonda District. 5 N. Srinivas S/o. N. Ramulu R/o. Sinthapally Village, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MOHD. ASHRAF ALI Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent No.5: ----- The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to restrain respondent Nos.3 and 4 from harassing the petitioner and interfering with his peaceful life. The petitioner is the father of one V.Venkat Ramulu, who was stated to be in love with one Narani Mamatha, daughter of respondent No.5. The petitioner averred that his son married the said Mamatha on 21-03-2009 at Uma Maheswari Temple, Nalgonda. The petitioner alleged that on coming to know about the said marriage, respondent No.5 and his family members are making telephone calls and giving life threats to him and that on the complaint lodged by respondent No.5, respondent No.4 arrested his son on 28-03-2009 and remanded him to judicial custody. The petitioner’s son was released on bail on 29-04-2009. The petitioner alleged that his daughter-in-law was forcibly shifted by respondent No.5 to her uncle’s house at Rajendranagar, where she was allegedly beaten severely, and that thereafter, she escaped from their illegal custody and joined his son, and that they are now residing in Hyderabad. The grievance of the petitioner is that at the instance of respondent No.5, respondent No.3 has been making telephone calls to him and interfering with his life and liberty. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on the complaints given by respondent No.5 and the uncle of the said Narani Mamatha, two complaints were registered as Crime Nos.515 and 64 of 2009 with respondent Nos.3 and 4 respectively for missing of the girl and that the said cases are still pending. She further stated that the respondents- Police have filed an application before VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, for permission to alter the said Crimes to one of kidnap of minor girl and that the same is pending. She stated that, the petitioner is not needed by the Police as at present and that unless a crime is registered against him, the Police will not interfere with his personal liberty in connection with the investigation if any. This submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is placed on record and the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner except in accordance with law. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.18516 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 21st July, 2009 lur