IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 26948 of 2008 Between: M.Ramesh S/o.M.Pandu R/o.Lalgadimalakpet village Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh,rep.by Tahsildar,Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 2 Syed Ali Ahmed s/o.Syed Abdul Rahman R/o.Durga Lalgadimalakpet village, Shamirpet Mandal Ranga Reddy District 3 Mekala Anitha W/oMekala Sattaiah R/o.H.No.4-14/2, Lalgadimalakpet village, Shamirpet Mandal Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate writ order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not conducting the enquiry by giving opportunity to the petition as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article,14,21 & 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct an enquiry by giving opportunity to the petitioner in file No.B/1390/2007 Counsel for the Petitioner:MS.M.ARCHANA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26948 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be joint owner of property admeasuring Acs.2.10 in survey No.7 situated at Lalgadimalakpet Village, Shemirpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The property was originally owned by petitioner’s ancestor – great grandfather, namely, Macha Shivaiah. After his death property devolved on petitioner’s grandfather. After his death, petitioner’s father and uncles are enjoying the property. After coming to know that respondent Nos.2 and 3 made an application to first respondent herein – Tahsildar for mutation of their names in respect of survey No.7 first respondent proposed to conduct enquiry on 16.08.2008. Petitioner submitted objection and enquiry was not completed, and therefore, instant writ petition is filed. After getting instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General-Telangana Area) submits that the enquiry is still pending and that the same will be completed in due course of time. In view of this the writ petition is disposed of directing first respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders under communication to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 11th December, 2008 GHN To 1 State of Andhra Pradesh,rep.by Tahsildar,Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 1.2CCs to GP for Revenue 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}