CLCON 181 of 2002 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain,J. Heard. None for the petitioner. Sri K.P. Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel appears for the opposite party. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the opposite parties are not the parties in the main petition in which the order dated 18.09.2001 was passed. Perusal of the copy of the order indicates that besides others Vice Chancellor, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna University, Garhwal was impleaded as respondent no.3. But from the perusal of the oreder it is evident that notices were directed to be issues to respondents nos.1 and 2 only, who are not the parties in the present contempt petition. Considering this, it cannot be alleged that the present opposite parties have committed any contempt in regard to the order passed by the Court. Considering this, the petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed. Notice is discharged. (Irshad Hussain, J.) 16.11.2002./B.