IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-13621 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.8.2011 Mohan Chand Sharma & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. KDS Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to raise all their pleas before the trial court at the appropriate stage. He, however, prays that the personal appearance of the petitioners, who are parents-in-law of the complainant, may be exempted during the course of trial. This prayer is not opposed by the learned State counsel. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. In case any application is moved by the petitioner for exemption of his personal appearance, trial court shall consider the same in accordance with law. It may exempt appearance of the petitioner before it, except on the dates it is necessary. The trial court shall also endeavour to expedite the trial of the case. (RAJAN GUPTA) 16.8.2011 JUDGE 'rajpal'