IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9178 of 2010 KALESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, S/O LATE HARILAL SINGH, R/O TEGACHHI, P.S. CHAUTHAM, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR. 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR. 4. D.I.G. MUNGER. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KHAGARIA. 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,ARARIA. 7. TREASURY OFFICER,ARARIA. 8. TREASURY OFFICER,KHAGARIA. 9. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), BIHAR. 10. BRANCH MANAGER,UNION BANK,CHAUTHAM BRANCH, CHAUTHAM, KAHAGARIA. 11. District Provident Fund Officer, Khaparia. ----------- 03. 02.08.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add District Provident fund Officer, Khaparia as respondent no. 11. Heard the parties. It is submitted that the commuted value of pension amounting to Rs. 45,940.30 was sanctioned and sent to the Accountant General for issuing the necessary authorization, as per letter no. 5855 dated 21.11.1998. The same was not issued. However during the pendency of the writ application, it has been issued on 02.07.2010 as such, on account of such delay, petitioner is entitled to reasonable interest. As regards the claim with regard to the payment of G.P.F. for the period 1966-67 to 1970 – 73 which was also maintained by the Accountant 2 General, the same has also not been done. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Accountant General submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 9. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)