1N ’LHE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) N0. 5038 of20Q§ Petitioner Vérsus Respondents 1. 2. WRI’ ‘ PE’l‘I’l‘ONRQNDER AKELQLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon’ble Shn' Satish K. Agm‘hotn' J.) Shn' Yashwant Singh 'I‘hakur, Deputy Afivocate General for the respondents/ State. Motilal Verma, aged about 5b years, S/o of Shri Nathulal Verma, Resident of primary school, West Jhagrakhand, Distt — Korea (c.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through — Secretaxy, Department of School Education, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education oEcer, KOrea, District Koma, C.G. ' Singhi Colliely Education Society Jhagtakhand, District Korea (C.G.), through The In change Heddmaster. The director, Directorate, public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur, C.G. (Passed on this 1 1th Day of September, 2008) ORDER 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the recommendation of the Fifth Pay Commission, which was granted to the similarly situated employees by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, passed by this Court in the matter ofSmt. A. La“ v. State of Chhattisgarhl (W.P.No. 4108 of 2005 and other connected matters) . The petitioner (Annexure Pf 2) tor grant of beneiit of the recommendation of" -"{ 2007(1) Bm 265} made applicatio on 2.8.2008 n the Fifth Pay Commission, Without giving reasona‘bb timc to the concerned authoxity to consider the case, the petitioner has rushed to me this petition on 8.9.2008. Since the application is already pending befoxe the concerned authority and the petitioner has rushed to this Court Without giving reasonable time to the concerned authority, this petition cannot be entertained at this stage, as it is premature. In View of the above, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable at this stage. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to raise a grievance, if so advised, in case the same survives, after reasonable time. Lv/ Sdl— i 'Satish K. Agnihotri ‘l‘hakur Judge