IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8415 of 2011 SATYANARAYAN KUMAR GUPTA Son of Rajendra Prasad Gupta, resident of Village Dhigopatti, PO Dandhauli, PS Jale, District Darbhanga ..........Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Commissioner- cum-Secretary, Patna 2. D M Darbhanga 3. District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Darbhanga, through its Member 4. Block Development Officer, Jale,Darbhanga 5. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Muraita Jale, District Darbhanga 6. Umesh Kumar s/o Devki Bhagat R/o Vill. +PO Manikali, PS Singhwara,District Darbhanga .........Respondents ----------- 02- 13/5/2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 13.4.2011, passed by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga, whereby Objection Case no.66/2010 (Umesh Kumar vs. Block Development Officer, Jale, Darbhanga), has been allowed and directed respondent no.6 herein to be appointed in preference to the present petitioner. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. It appears to us that the learned Tribunal has found that Umesh Kumar scored higher marks, and was higher in the merit list, than the present writ petitioner. Therefore, the 2 Tribunal has allowed the objection case of Umesh Kumar. The impugned order cannot be faulted for the reasons assigned by the learned Tribunal. 3. There is no merit in the writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) mrl