t ^ .^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WntPet|taosiJSlNo._4^1of2008 : Prasad Singh aged about 61 years, son of Shri Sarmaii Singh, Resident of Primary School, North Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: SecretaQ/, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhavvan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Administrator/Principal, I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Penslon Bada,Raipur(CG). (WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TBE CONSTnUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri, J.) \ Present : Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 29th day ofJuiy, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for heai-ing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher, vvorking in I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), mn and managed by the respondent No. 3. The petitioner without giving details as to what is the nature of the School, vvhy the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed this petition, praying that the respondents be directed to grant benefits of5 Pav Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difficult to decide the issue involved for want of adequate materials with regard to grant of 5 Pay Commission to the employees. "% Sahu f' This Court has already considered and decided the same issue on 06.02.2007 in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. No. 4108 of2005) and other connected matters. 5. lt is not necessary to approach this Court dlrectly when the law on a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a representatioii to the concemed authorities, ifso advised, in the light of law settled by this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Supra). 6> This petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated libeity. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' 2007 (1) BLJ 265 I