MC 3381/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Office note dated 20.11.2010 indicates that the service of notice on the respondent No.2 and deemed service on the respondent No.1. None appears for any of the respondents today. The matter will proceed ex-parte against them. This instant application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay of 390 days in preferring the connected appeal. Th e grounds for delay indicated in paragraph 3 of the application are meticulously perused. What appears from the paragraph 3 of the application is that the appel lant is prevented from preferring the appeal in time due to these grounds indica ted therein. The grounds appear to be cogent and sufficient. I find no reason to reject the application. It is accordingly allowed. Delay as indicated in the ap plication is condoned. Misc. case stands disposed of.