1 WP 1690/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1690 OF 2007 Anant s/o Parshuram Choudhari And Others. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. ------- Shri. S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. V.B. Ghatge, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondents Nos.1 and 2. ------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 18th JULY 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The father of the petitioners – Parshuram filed a civil suit against the father of respondents Nos.3 and 4 Muktaji for specific performance of contract. According to the 2 WP 1690/2007 petitioners, the suit came to be decreed on 31-3-1983 by the Civil Court. The suit land was subjected to land acquisition. According to the petitioners, the Collector passed Award in the year 1988. The petitioners were not party to the said Award. Respondents 3 and 4 were party to the Land Acquisition Reference which was preferred in the year 1992. 3) In this petition filed in November 2006 the petitioners seek directions to respondents – authorities not to disburse the amount in a Special Darkhast filed by respondents Nos.3 and 4 in the Civil Court at Ahmednagar. 4) There is nothing on record as on today as to whether the amount is disbursed to the respondents or not. Considering the facts of the case we find that the petitioners will have to resort to appropriate remedies as available to them in the appropriate forum to establish their right to claim the compensation amount. In 3 WP 1690/2007 exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction we do not find this to be a fit case for interference. 5) The writ petition is dismissed with liberty. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.1690.07