AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3329 OF 2009 Haseeb Zubair Mulla ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Ms. N.S. K. Ayubi for the petitioner. Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.:- 1. We have heard Ms. Ayubi, leaned counsel appointed for the petitioner. We have also heard Mr. Khonde- Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner is an accused in POTA Special Case No.2 of 2003. He has filed this petition through jail. The petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for deletion of certain AJN 2 charges invoked against him. He has made certain grievances about the investigating agency. Since the charge-sheet is already filed it is not possible for us to entertain such prayers and grievances. Remedy of the petitioner is to approach the trial court and he may adopt it if he so desires. 3. The petitioner has also prayed that a direction be given to add certain charges against the accused in Malegaon blast case; that direction be given to initiate criminal proceedings against certain named police officers and that direction be given to the police to produce police papers in Malegaon blast case. The petitioner virtually wants us to take over investigation of the Malegaon blast case. This court cannot do so. This court does not monitor investigation and direct arrests. In a given case, the police can be called upon to show that proper investigation is being conducted. But, not in all cases can this be done. This is a rambling petition. No case is made out for grant of reliefs. AJN 3 4. The petition is dismissed. 5. This order be communicated to the petitioner in jail. [MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]