IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.2299 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 26, 2011 DES RAJ ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. RS Budhwar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Notice of motion was issued on 9.2.2010 with a direction that the case be heard with CWP 8474 of 2009 (Suresh Chand and others v. The Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others), on the plea of the petitioner that the said case is similar to the present case. CWP 8474 of 2009 has been dismissed vide order dated 25.5.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to dispute that the present case is similar to CWP 8474 of 2009. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed, for reasons given in order dated 25.5.2011, passed in CWP 8474 of 2009 (Suresh Chand and others v. The Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and others). May 26, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?