l?ss^l •t. iS'': ^^ ^ |«£i : u:s ;.'o IS'.^'gt liS'1'-!'^ "K'lai:;6 ^'•:,:;l^^:.'.::lc^- i.:^ •if*"'..''^ j?"" tia raGHGQURTOEeHHA'rTIseARH^TfifLftSPUR WritPetitMnNo. 3273 of 1996 Petitioner ShriHem. Chandra Saxena Versus^ •• . . :, ;• ,/ : - : .:.':-"~^ Respondents ^ The State ofMadhya PiaidesU aad ofhers"'l:r :: • • : : •- Sit^le Bench ; Hon'bk Mr. Jiistice Satlsh K. Agnlllotri. Noiie forthe peti.tioner. SIin Siuiil Otroaiu, Panel las?yer fbrfllie respondcn^ 1 aiul 2. (oneforthcrespoDdentNo.S. ORAEGRDSR (lllltMay, 2006) The firilowmg ordcr offhe Gourtwas passed toy SatishK. A®Uil»ota;i,J. 1. The inatter is called for hearing twriee. Oa bcA tIifioces®BMis,^^^ appears nor any represeliteitiouis lEiadeonbetialfofthfipetitioneT. In view of fhe alxwe, the petition stands disDussed ibr •aon-pFoaeevct3p&. : ^':. 1;:.' ' ;; Sd/- Satish K. Asnihotri Judge s lll'llT l!li!i