WW,WW,W @ r g3 ; I Qwigayua’ .....wt 2003’ amm- (Watt) ’ble Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo Section 10/1 2/1 of the Contempt of Courts Act) in Ie Benc 30-7-2007:- Shri Manoj Mishra, cou sel for the petitioner. Shri Prafulla Bharat, co nsei for the respondent. Shri V.K. Rathore, CEO is also present in person. LA. No.1, application or taking documents on record, is ailowed. ‘ Documents are taken on reco . Shri Prafulla Bharat s tted that representation of the petitioner was decided on 9-1 1-2006, there ore, vide order dated 25'" June, 2007 the petitioner has already been giv n appointment on the ppst of Shiksha Karmi. In view of the above, t s contempt petition does not survive, same is liable to be dismissed and it is ereby dismissed. / S h: n r u i " aWE§ ‘ WWW mm: tnn'éf ifz'aW ammm 9 PETITIONER: Smt. Wineeta Choubey, wifé of j Shri Dilip Kumar Choubey, aged i about 35 years, Pipraul, Tahsil ~ i Pal, at pre£ent resided at Ward 1 No. (5). Ramanujganj, District i W Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ' i -Versus- “RESPONDENT: V.K. Rathore, Chief Executive CONTEMNOR I Officer, Janpad Panchayat — Ramchandrapur (Ramanujganj), Districj Surguja (Chhatiisgarh) (Contempt Petition under A icle 215 of the Constitution of india read with