1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12497 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.37989 OF 2010 Kalyan Vishwanath Rochakari .. Applicant Versus Anuradha alias Anandibai Anil Shinde and ors. .. Respondents Mr R.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant CORAM : MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 18th October 2011 PER COURT 1. Learned Counsel submits that the notice of respondent No.1 Anuradha is returned unserved and the reason given in the panchnama is that her husband refused to accept the notice. 2. In view of the said panchnama, prayer is made that the applicant/appellant be allowed to serve respondent No.1 by substitute service i.e. by affixing notice on the residential door. 3. Civil Application allowed. Issue notice returnable 15.11.2011. Hamdust allowed. ( MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. ) (vvr/12497.11ca)