- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.8261 PETITION NO.8261 PETITION NO.8261 OF 2004 OF 2004 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.R.S.Ghadge for Mr.Appasaheb S. Desai for the Petitioner Mr.P.N.Joshi for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 19, 2006. : JANUARY 19, 2006. : JANUARY 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioner and the Advocate for the Respondent No.1. The order appointing Administrator under Section 78(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperataive Societies Act,1960 has been set aside by the Appellate authority and there is confirmation of the said order by the Revisional Authority. The Revisional Authority while confirming the order passed by the Appellate Authority has held that the mandatory requirement of having consultation with the federal society has not been complied with. There is nothing on record to show that there was such consultation. Hence, there is no error in the order impugned. Petition is rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.