IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5882 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: February 21, 2011 Paramjit Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Girdawar Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Amandeep Soni, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 12.8.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the original Will as executed by Piara Singh on 28.11.2003 was not produced on the record, though it was with the counsel for the petitioner. However, photo copy of the said registered Will Ex.P1 was proved on the record by examining PW-1 Baljeet Chand Lamberdar and PW-3 Ashok Kumar one of its attesting witness. The plaintiff Paramjit Singh (PW2) has also proved the said Will Ex.P-1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the original Will though was in the brief of the counsel, but he did not produce the same for the reasons best known to him. The circumstances reveal that the original Will could not be produced on the record for the fault on the part of the counsel, therefore, it would be expedient in the interest of justice and in order to enable the court to pronounce the judgment, to allow the petitioner to bring on record the original Will dated 28.11.2003 (copy Ex.P-1) in order to avoid any technical objection by the respondents. In the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is allowed to prove on record original Will dated 28.11.2003 (copy Ex.P1) on record. The petition is allowed subject to payment of `2000/- as costs to be paid by the counsel for the plaintiff from his own pocket. February 22, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge