: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2146 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1479 OF 2009 Wilfred Louis Creado .. Plaintiff V/s. Conrad Louis Creado & Ors. .. Defendants ..... Mr. Yogendra Kanchan for the plaintiff Mr. Nitin Shah for the defendants ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 31ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. It is stated that the plaint in the suit is settled between the plaintiff and the defendants. They have confirmed the shares of each other in the suit property. 2. The property which is described in annexure I to the consent terms, now belongs to the plaintiff and will have full control over the same. 3. This arrangement has been confirmed by both plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 3, 5, and 6 and the defendant No.4 is the constituted attorney of the other defendants. He has signed the consent terms on behalf of the defendants so : 2 : also himself. He confirms all clauses therein. The parties state that consent terms have been arrived at willingly and without any pressure or force. 4. Having satisfied myself that the consent terms fully resolve the disputes and differences between parties so also there is no force or coercion on parties to agree to a decree being passed in terms thereof, I proceed to take the consent terms on file. 5. The consent terms taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. There shall be an order in terms of the consent terms. Suit decreed accordingly. Refund of Court fees as per rules. No order as to costs. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)