bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1127 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1127 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1127 OF 2008 Genset Light & Power & ors. ... Petitioners v/s MARCO Industries Pvt. Ltd. & anr. ... Respondents Mr.Anil Agarwal for the petitioners. Smt.A.A.Mane, A.P.P. for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 9TH JUNE, 2008 9TH JUNE, 2008 9TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The order passed by the Magistrate issuing process in C.C.No.875/SS/2007 is challenged in this petition as also the order of the 9th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application No.81 of 2008. 2. A contention is raised that the petitioner No.3 is not in any way connected with the petitioner No.1 of which the petitioner No.2 is the Managing Partner. It is submitted that he has issued the concerned cheques in his individual capacity and not as a representative of the petitioner No.1. This contention will have to be examined by evidence and the process cannot be stayed merely on the statement made. 2 3. In my opinion, there is no error committed by either of the lower Court in issuance of the process. 4. Petition rejected.