BtPlyl ,^' > i^tsSQ^ (2) INTHE HIGHCOURTOFCHHAmSGARHAE BILASPUR WRITPETITIONfStNO,62-^2007 PETITIONERS ^3. ^ ^'^ ^ •^ <^" / C) /5. / TejPratap Singh S/o Shri Indrajeet Singh Age about 50 years, Lecturer, Govt.Hr. Sec: School, Kumhari, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) Shambhoo NathPandey S/o Late Shri Dhruwdev Pandey Age about49 years, Lecturer, Govt.Hr. Sec.School,Kumhari, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Ku. PratishthaShukla S/o Shri N. D. Shukla Ageabout39 years, Lecturer, Govt. Adarsh Girls Hr. Sec. SchQol, Durg, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) , Smt. Sandhya Chandrawanshi W/oShri.ShashikantChandrawanshi Age abdut 43 years, Lecturer, Govt. Adarsh Girls Hr.Sec.Schopl, Durg, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) Smt. Gopi RanlSiriah (Before marriage Ku. Gopi Rani Nikhare) W/o Shri Pramod KumarSiriah . Age about 47 years, Lecturer, Govt. Adarsh Girls Hr. Sec. Sehool, :Durg,Distt.-Durg(C.G.)' Smt. Aruna Shrivastava (BeforemarriageKu.ArunaSaxena):; W/o Shri R K. Shrivastava ^,.: .s,. Ageabout 49 years.Lecturer,^ ..•?;; Govt. Adarsh Girls Hr. Sec. Schodl, Dyrg, Distt. - Durg (G.G.) -^ .<*rf- ^ RESPONDEN1S C^) %.,' :•:::• :-.;' ::(3);:: ^7. Smt.BrigitBhalla ' (Before marriage Ku. BrigitToppo) W/o Shri'Manjeet Singh Bhalla Age about 42 years, Lecturer, ;,. Govt. Hr. Sec. Sehool, Khamhariyar Junwani, Distt.- Dyrg (C.G.) v / 8. Smt Sapana Ghattarjee (Before:iT@rriage Ku. Sapana Mukharjse) W/o Shri Anup Kumar Chattarjee ;-' Age about 50 years, Lecturer, Govt. iHr.Sec.School.Kumhari, Distt.-Durg(C.G.) 9. SmtShivani Banerjee (Before marriage Shivani Bhattacharya) W/o Shri Shushanfo Banerj'ee Age absut 44 years, Lecturer, ' Govt;BhartlHr.Sec.SchQol,Arjurtda, Gundardehi,Distt.-Durg(C.G.) /W. TikamSsngh Kolhe S/o Shri Baldev Ram Kolhe . .,: Ageabout 42 years,Leeturer, ,;•• Govt.Hr. Sec.School.Temri, ";, i Nandghat, Distt.- Durg (C.G.) ' " " •.._--..-' ! : 1. ••, 1 1 ;'I1 VERSUS - y 1. State Govt.of CiiiiatUsgarh Througl-l: Secretary, .SchQol Educatioh Department Ministry, .D.K.^.Bhavan.RaipLir(C.G.); y 2. DirectorofPublielnstruction ' Raipur(C;.G.) - "• ; /3. District EduGatfon Officer Dura^C.Q.) . • . ••:^l 74. DistrictEciucationQfficer ] RajnandgaQn (C.G.) ;y. • ' ,.^ '^•sss&s1 .^'6K»!m!^-iK^^K..?-i.'auus^aaiEK,BM;=T.a.Ut5Me5»sa<jpf-ii-~| i4f(ing|i ii-jij^j Y" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA XI-HC-78 3n^T9>Tf?;liq» (raTsn^rgiw ^ .c Bablu V- •V-. ' T^^fPfKPf, ®Tf1wis,RlrtlUy . ^. f.W^O. G^LG *(l*«llSbHlcb """"""""•""CT^ 2()fc07 SH^TVi^K (^crf^isft^T) ?^<tRKBlitT3TI^r 1.2.2007 Mr. Ajoy Shrivastava, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel 4»unselfor the petitioners. 'tVith the conssn't of 'jiwyer for ths respondents/State. leamed counse! for the parties, the |disposed of. matters are heard finally and Common order dictatejd in W.P. (s) No. 626 of 2007 in open Court, paswd separoteiy. A copy of this order petitions. »t>i<i[<i41-t*(i*inV ff te^<Riwi< ^sil^irgTi^rr be placed on record in connected writ Sd/-, ^Satisli^el^njl Judge ^//^/'^ w y P.T.O. ->-7 ^) tC<i^ MI6H COUR-F OT CHHATTIS6ARN AT BIl.AffUR SIN6t£BEI^M : WON'BLEMR SATISHK A^IIMOTRIsJ, WRTT PETmONfaV N0. 626 OF 2007 Petitioners versus Respondents TejPratap Singh ond ofhers State 6ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh anel o-thers WRTT PETTTION feV N0. 627 OP 20)7 Petitioners Resuondents versus Sheo Praa>d Verma cnd others State 6ovt. of Chhatt'isyxrh and others Petitioner WRrr pErmoN M NO ^s OF 2007 Srat. Koalta Sinhd (Befere mapria9e Ku. Kwta SirivasTam versus Respondents The State of Chhatt-isgarh andl others Present ; Mp.AjcyShrivofilava.counselfprthepetitioners. Ms. Sunitajain, Pcmel tawyer for 1+ie Stafte/ respondents. O R & E R O'assedorithis 1st Febnnry, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel ofspear'mg fw the petitioners as well as leamed Penal lawyer oppearing for •the respondents/5'hate jointly, submit •Hiat the facts ond question of taw inwlved in the pFesent writ f petition are squarsly covered by -the cfecision of this Court- h'l the ooss of 'yasfmwfif Kumer Bharadwaj •vs. Mwiicipal Cmpofwlion. t)wy and eawthe^'. 2. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioner has pomted put 't-he circular dated 13.9.1997 (Annexure P/l), whereunder according to F~3 '^^ ^rj^ ths petitioners, the petitioners, who had ohtained B.Ed. ExnminationCertifiMi'tesbeforeappointfflent.arealsoentittedto two advance increments. The respondents/State, while considering thecases of the peti+ioners,shall gront the relief.in accordonce with the circular (suprn). For theafoi'ementioned reasons, these writ petitions (»r«disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yad^want Kunmr £ a/arf*^/'(5upro),subject to verification of the foct asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed. Cert-ificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 <md further whe-ther they have been paid two adwance increments or not. Nb order as to costs. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. Sdfe., •SatishsKjg Judge; '^) %. Bablu 1 2006CtI)WJR-CS96