IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36532 of 2009 Date of decision: February 03, 2010 Umesh Gupta .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naresh Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Addl. A.G. Haryana. A.N. Jindal, J Stated that challan has already been presented in the court against Narinder Kumar and Deepak Kumar, who are on bail. I have been taken through the report dated 20.11.2009 (Annexure P12) made by the District Inspector wherein, even during re- investigation of the case, no incriminating evidence was found against the petitioner. Now on the application moved by the complainant Ashok Kumar, under Section 190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C. the petitioner has been summoned as accused to face trial along with Narinder Kumar and Deepak umar. The earlier order dated 27.3.2009 was passed by the court prior to the filing of the charge sheet against the accused Narinder Kumar and Deepak Kumar and before the petitioner was declared as innocent by the police. Now after changed circumstances when he is summoned by the court on the application of the prosecution, the petitioner has moved this application for anticipatory bail. No further investigation is required. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is also not required. The other accused persons involved in the case are already on bail. Under the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail, subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. February 03, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge