Civil Revision No. 117 of 2009 04.12.2009 Present:- Mr. Atul Jhingan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Satyan Vaidya, counsel for the respondents. The tenant/ petitioner has filed revision under Section 25 (5) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 against the eviction order dated 4.9.2008 passed by the learned Rent Controller and affirmed by the appellate authority on 29.6.2009 on the ground of re-construction. The petitioner through his counsel has filed an undertaking dated 3.12.2009 today in the Court which is taken on record. The petitioner by way of undertaking has submitted that he does not want to contest the revision on merits as he has undertaken to hand over the vacant possession of the premises in dispute to the respondents/landlords latest by 3.12.2010. He has also undertaken that in case he will not hand over the premises to the respondents on or before 3.12.2010, then respondents shall be entitled to execute the eviction order against him and he shall also be liable for contempt of Court. It has also been stated in the undertaking that the entire arrears of use and occupation charges have been paid to the landlords. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner shall continue to pay monthly use and occupation charges till the premises is vacated by him and possession is handed over to the respondents. The petitioner has further stated in the - 2 undertaking that the undertaking given by him shall be binding upon him as well as upon his legal representatives or any other person claiming under him. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in case the petitioner is given time to hand over vacant possession of the premises to the respondents till 3.12.2010 in terms of the undertaking of the petitioner given in the Court today and petitioner continue to pay use and occupation charges of the premises till premises is vacated by him. The undertaking given by the petitioner today in the Court is accepted. The petitioner is given time to vacate the premises in dispute and hand over vacant possession of the premises to the landlords on or before 3.12.2010 with the condition that petitioner shall continue to pay use and occupation charges to the landlords till the vacant possession of the premises is handed over to the landlords. It is made clear that in case the petitioner shall not hand over the vacant possession of the premises on or before 3.12.2010 as per his undertaking or violates any other condition of the undertaking, then petitioner shall be liable for contempt of this Court and the respondents shall further be entitled to execute the eviction order immediately on violation of any term of the undertaking. The petition is disposed of on the above terms. December 4, 2009. ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.