IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 947 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : August 6, 2009 State of Haryana Appellant Versus Purushottam Dass Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present : Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG Haryana for the appellant Mr. Sharad Yadav, Advocate for the respondent NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) It is agreed by learned counsel for the parties that the present R.F.A. is covered by decision of this Court in R.F.A. No. 1329 of 1995 titled as State of Haryana vs. Vijay Kumar, decided on 19.11.2008 . In view of the above stand of learned counsel for the parities, the parties through their learned counsel are directed to appear before District Judge, Faridabad on 15.10.2009. The learned District Judge, Faridabad may either keep the references with himself or may entrust the same to any other Additional District Judge who is dealing with the cases referred bak by Hon'ble the Supreme Court. Considering the fact that the acquisition in the present cases is about 20 years old, it would be appreciated if the learned court below decides the references at an early date. RFA No. 947 of 2008 (O&M) 2 Before, I finally conclude the order, I find merit in the submission of the learned counsel for the landowners that the enhanced compensation, if already received by the claimants/landowners should not be directed to be returned back till the matter is finally decided by the reference court. Ordered accordingly. However, it is made clear that any amount already paid to the landowners shall be subject to the final decision of the Reference Court. Disposed off in the same terms as RFA No. 1329 of 1995. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 06.08.2009 Judge reena