THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.24924 OF 2009 AND WVMP No.3909 of 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioner approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the official respondents I not providing the police protection to the petitioner inspite of the complaint being made and injunction was granted by the competent civil court which is in force as being illegal, arbitrary, untenable and contrary to the procedure established by law, consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to provide necessary police protection to the petitioner to protect the property in plot No.1 and 2 situated at Survey No.30 and 31 (part) situated at Guttala Begumpet, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District forming part of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andprper in the circumstances of the case. 2 This court was pleased to pass an interim order in WPMP No.32451 of 2009 on 17.11.2009 directing the respondents 3 and 4 to provide required police protection to the petitioner. Fifth respondent in the Writ Petition approached this court and filed WVMP No.3909 of 2009 seeking vacation of the said interim order passed by this court on 17.11.2009 stating that the petitioner without first approaching the civil court seeking police protection has straight away approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition and further contending that there is a dispute with regard to the identity of the property. 3 Pursuant to the orders passed by this court, the petitioner has come forward with WPMP No.33275 of 2009 seeking amendment of the prayer in the Writ Petition and WPMP No.33276 of 2009 seeking a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. 4 Mr. P. Sri Raghuram learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Mr. V.Venkata Ramana learned senior counsel appearing for the fifth respondent have strenuously contended before this court stating that the respondents 3 and 4 are interfering with the civil disputes of the petitioner and as a competent civil court is ceased of the matter, it is only for the said civil court to decide the dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. 5 In the light of the said consensus, WPMP No.33275 of 2009 is ordered and the main prayer is amended and the respondents 3 and 4 are hereby directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. Further, as the competent civil court is ceased of the matter, i.e. O.S.No.2281 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy, and already the fifth respondent had approached the said civil court and filed an application seeking vacation of the ad interim injunction order, in my considered view, the police have no business to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the fifth respondent. 6 With the above observations this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. In the light of this order, the earlier interim order passed by this court on 17.11.2009 directing the police to provide police protection to the petitioner is hereby vacated. ------------------ 24.11.2009 kvsn