IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 8515 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Surinder Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The petitioner though has made an appeal and the same has been considered, however, fact of the matter is that the case of the petitioner is required to be re-looked into in view of the instructions issued on 03.02.2009 and the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 2882 of 2008, titled Darshan Singh Versus H.R.T.C.. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director of the respondent- Corporation to re-look into the matter in view of the observations made hereinabove, within a period of two months from today. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `