IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20068 of 2011 Naresh Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 14.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the prosecution case alleged occurrence took place in the night of 25.2.2011 and admittedly, informant gave written report to the concerned police station on 2.3.2011. It is pointed out by him that on 1.3.2011 informant filed complaint case bearing Complaint case no. 164/2011 against the petitioner and two other persons for the same occurrence and there is no consistency between facts of complaint petition as well as in the first information report. Moreover, informant has admitted in her solemn affirmation recorded in the above stated case that prior to the alleged occurrence petitioner had filed case against her and other family members. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Naresh Ram, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha District West Champaran in Bagaha (Patakhauli) P.S. Case no. 82/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)