IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.P(C).No. 11448 of 2008(K) ---------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. NIKHIL.M.N., MANAPUTHIYANGADI, PALAKKADA EDAKKAD P.O., CALICUT. 2. HATHIM SAEED T.V., TVH MANDIR, SS ROAD, VENGARA P.O., MALAPPURAM. 3. JARSHAD K.V., MASHREQ, PATTEL THAZHAM, POKKUNNU P.O., CALICUT. 4. ASHRAF REMZAM, SHALIMAR 30/728, P.O.MEDICAL COLLEGE, CALICUT. 5. RABID.E., PALLIYALI THODU HOUSE, NOONCHALLUR, MUTHUVALLUR P.O., MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.RAJESH SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, (B-TECH COURSE), UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 11448 OF 2008 K = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners are B.Tech. students. They have submitted Exts. P1 to P5 applications seeking revaluation of their answer papers mentioned therein. Despite the applications that were made, the University has not made any progress in the matter. Learned counsel appearing for the University, on instructions, submits that the last for submitting the applications was only 30.3.2008 and therefore the University cannot be accused of any inordinate delay. 2. True, as contended by the learned counsel for the University, if 30.3.2008 was the last date for submitting applications for revaluation, the students cannot have accused the University of any culpable delay in this matter. 3. But, however, having regard to the fact that an expeditious completion of the revaluation is necessary in the interest of the students' academic career, I feel, the University W.P.(C) No. 11448 OF 2008 - 2 - should complete the process as expeditiously as possible. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing that the revaluation sought for by the petitioner by Exts. P1 to P5 will be expedited and completed, if the applications made by them are otherwise in order. The process shall be completed and results shall be declared, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-