IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33893 of 2010 NITISHEWAR JHA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 6.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners sought their discharge from the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in S.T. No. 21 of 2006 and that the learned court, by order dated 1.6.2010, held that the offence under section 307 of the IPC appeared made out against the accused persons and, as such, charges were required to be framed against them. The learned judge has made reference to certain paragraphs of the case diary and perused the connected materials accompanying the police report. The injuries were also considered as may appear from the impugned order and, after considering the relevant materials, passed the impugned order. In the light of the detailed order based on relevant materials, the court feels that the petition is of no merit. It is dismissed accordingly. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)