IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4613 of 2008 Between: PEARL PLAZA, rep.by its Managing partner Captain K.Kishan, S/o.Late K.yellaiah, R/o.Plot No.690, Naveen Nagar colony Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, having office at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Principal Secretary, Department of Forests, Govt of AP Secretariat,. Hyderabad 4 The Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal , R.R.District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 4 in not issuing the pattadar pass books and title deeds in favour of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.59.20 guntas situated in Sy.No.92 of Jalpally village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and in not denotifying the lands in favour of the petitioner by the 3rd respondent as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of principles natural justice and also violative the provisions of AP Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass books Act, 1971 and consequently direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner dated 11.11.2002 and dated 5.4.2003 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 4613 of 2008 Order: The petitioner-Company claims to be absolute owner and possessor of the land in an extent of Ac.59.20 gts., situated in Survey No. 92 of Jalpally village, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District, having purchased the same under a registered sale deed. The petitioner-Company states that it made a representation dated 05.07.2003 requesting the 4th respondent, namely the Mandal Revenue Officer, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District, for mutation of its name in the revenue records and for issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds under the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’), but it’s grievance is that till date the 4th respondent has not passed any orders thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 4th respondent, namely the Mandal Revenue Officer, Saroornagar Mandal, R.R. District, is directed to consider the representation dated 05.07.2003 of the petitioner-Company and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr