-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4779 OF 2007 Shri Himat Krushna Pharande : Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.A.M.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Abhay Patki with Mr.Abhijit B. Kadam for respondent nos.3 & 4. ... CORAM : S.B.MHASE & A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 29, 2008. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was appointed in 2001 on yearly basis. The school at that time was not getting grant-in-aid. The school started getting partial grant from 2004 onwards. While considering the services of the petitioner, the petitioner’s case was considered by the Government taking into consideration the work load on a clock-hour basis and under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached -: 2 :- this Court claiming the status of permanency and pay as per the MEPS Rules from 2001 onwards and at least in any case from 2004-05 till 2006-07 i.e. when the school has started getting partial grant-in-aid. Since the approval was not granted by the Government, the services of the petitioner were terminated and, thereafter, the petitioner has approached the School Tribunal. Therefore, the whole issue in respect of approval of the petitioner and termination of his services is the subject-matter of the pending appeal. Under these circumstances, it will be inappropriate for this Court to consider the case of the petitioner for permanency and the benefits of permanency. We refrain from entertaining this petition. 3. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, rejected. (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)