IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13888 of 1999 Brahmdeo Mahto, Son of late Bikan Mahto, Resident of Village Kishanpur Usuf, Police Station Sarairanjan, District Samastipur. ------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar ---- Opposite 1st Party 2. Kapildeo Mahto. 3. Harbansh Mahto. Both sons of late Nathuni Mahto. 4. Rajendra Mahto. 5. Yogendra Mahto. 6. Bijai Mahto. Opposite parties nos. 4 to 6 are sons of Yadunandan Mahto. 7. Ram Subhag Mahto. 8. Ram Bilas Mahto. Both are sons of Dinkar Mahto. 9. Manoj Mahto, Son of Ram Sakal Mahto. 10. Chandeshwar Mahto, Son of late Janak Lal Mahto. 11. Indradeo Mahto, Son of Khirodhan Mahto. All of Village Kishanpur Usuf, Police Station Sarairanjan, District Samastipur. --------- Opposite 2nd Party ----------- 4 7.8.2009 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, counsel for the opposite party no.2 is present. In view of the admitted fact that for the same set of offence, a First Information Report was lodged on 22.1.1997 and again a complaint case was filed on 31.3.1997, the view recorded by the revisional court for reconsidering the issue under Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the consequential direction thereof to the Magistrate, does not suffer from any infirmity. 2 That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)