CD <.*Br,.l.-8C S- •"(CE.SPi oiHyiu ss-ww 7-s^ PETITIONER IN THE HIGH COUKT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRIT PETITION (S1NO. '?'?/A /-30Q&' ^A- '^<v. ^;r'^y-s:y ,......;-^13-^- [C.G.] ^^^>..--- Narottam Prasad Sahu S/o Brijlal Sahu Aged-about 43 years, R/o RES 27,DNK colony, Kondagaon, Distt.- Bastar WERSBS ^^ ^ .fl^ y^^ss' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Raipur [C.G.]. Z.Director, Veterinary Service Mahasamund Road, Raipur [C.G.] 3. Joint director, Veterinary Service, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur [C.G.] 4. Deputy Director, Veterinary Service, Bastar Division, Kondagaon Jagdalpur [C.G.] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTtTUTION OP INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPRQra'IA'nB WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTIONS HI^l COUKT OF CHHATTLSeARH AT BILAyUR Writ Petition i/S) No. 991 of Petjtioner" Narottdm Prasad Sdiu Versus State of Chhattisgorh & other-s Singie Bench; Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K.. ^gnihotri. Present: Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner-. Ms. Deepali Pwidey, Panel Lffi«yer'f<w the State/respondents. (Passed on 26'1' E>ay of February, The foitowing order- of the Court was pcased by Sa'Nsh K. ,J. 1. Leorned counsei appearing fsw the petitioner- submits that the petitioner woa a^iomted ce Ar-ea Assistant (Kshetra Shayak) on ad hoc basis by order dated 15.5.85 by the Joint birector, Veterjnary Serviees, Bdsta* Oivision, Kond<q<»n, Jagdalpur (C.@.). The petitioner continued os ad hoc Ar-ea Assistant (Kshetra Shoyak) tii! he wcss reguiarized in service on 31.8.89 (Annexure P/2). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitied to grant of annua! increments in view of Circuior- No. 138622. 92 N1-1 Four dated 18.8.1993 issued by the Finance Oepartment. In vlew of the said circular, the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to make a representation before the concerned (wthorities for gront of amua! Increments, to which iewned counsel appeorln9 for the res(xsndents/State hssa m objection. 3. In the event a r-epresentation is made, the respondents authorities may consider the same, in accordance with 'iow, on its own merit, wlthin a period of eight weeks from the receipt of representation, if any. 4. The petition atands accordingly diaposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. — Certified copy as per ruies. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r