'"^^ c s? o®(^iittSi.E.BENgiS ^. Iri theHonble Hiflh Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P. (S) No. ^^ 2006 Petitioner 'J^:' Respondent... Smt. Sarajana Tripathi ( before marrage Ku. Sarahana Mishra) Aged 42 years W/0 Shri Umesh KumarTripathi, Lecturer, Govt. Hi.Sec. School ,JamgaBn(R) District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS -I.The State Governmentof Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ThdMst'fc.Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) </"' Writ petition under articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS^ Certjorari, Prohibition and oiher sujtable WRIT or wnts^ Qrder or orders^ Direction pr directions. XI-HC-78 *fmoTTsti*<i<»» 3^ •<<l<lld<l, ®Tflu'ls,Rlcfltiy<. LJ.y<S^NO .'?s<-73^S/<?6 'V^ 200 3tl^<'l Msi<n ('ptg^EF) sn^rwR-ii* tpiTsti^rgiw waTwafersn^r »hi<ifa<fl-f*iifinTiFtei<S'<Riwi< ^sri^irsn^T Subbarfi p' 4-1-2007 Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Mr. petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawye tomkant Verma, oounsel for the for the State/respondents. dispos^d Wrth the consent of leamed the matter is heard finally and dispos Common order dictated In W open Court, passed separately. A copy of this order be placi writ petitions. ^ounset appearing for the partles, ^dof. ^t Petitlon (S.) No. 7301 of 2006 in d on the record of ttie connected Sd/- Satish K.Agnifaotri Judge &\^^ P.T.O. H©HCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petjtioner Respondents WRIT PETITION fS.l N0.7301 OF 2006 Smt. Prabha Thakur versus Petjtjoner Respondents Petitioner Resoondente PetiUoner Resoondents The Stat®Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7302 OF 2006 Fakeer Singh Sahu vereus The Stete Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.7303 OF 2006 Hirendra KumarGajbhiye versus State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7304 OF 2006 MojiRam Sahu versus The State Govemment ofChhattisgarti and another Petitioner Respondents WRFT PETITION (S.l N0.7305 OF 2006 Lalit Kumar Patel versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and ottiers WRIT PETITION fS.) N0.7306 OF 2006 Petitioner : MeghRam Jaiswal versus Respondente : State Govt. ofChhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents PeUfloner Respondents Petjtioner Respondents VWIT PETITION fS.t N0.7307 OF 2006 Vishram Prasad Verma versus State Govt. ofChhattisgarh and others WRIT PETmON (S.t N0.7332 OF 2006 Bhagwat Lal Sahu versus The State Government ofChhattsgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7333 OF 2006 Vishnu Ram Thakur yersys Petitioner Respondents The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETmON (S.l N0.7334 OF 2006 Salik Prasad Dwivedi versus The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7335 OF 2006 Narendra Kumar Dewangan yersys The State Government ofChhattisgarti and another Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7336 OF 2006 Smt. Prem Lata Tiwari versus The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another i» :CT Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7337 OF 2006 Tikam Lal Pisda TOfSUS Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondente Petitioner Respondents The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7338 OF 200S Jeewan Lal Sahu versus The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7338 OF 2006 Smt. Vidhyawati Sahu versus The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.\ N0.7340 OF 2006 Mamta Jha versus Petitioner Respondents The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION <S.) N0.7341 OF 2006 Hira Lal Sahu versus The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION fS.l N0.7342 OF 2006 Petitioner Snrt. Dhaleshari Thakur vereus Respondente The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETmON (S.l N0.7343 OF 2006 Petitjoner Narad Lal Arkane yersus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7344 OF 2006 Petitioner Sushil Kumar Sharma versus Resoondente The State Government of Chhattisgarh and anottier WRITPETITION (S.l N0.7345 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Smt. Sarajana Tripathi The State Govemment of ChhatUsgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7346 OF 2006 Petjtisner Rohit Kumar Indoriya yersus Resoondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another 9' c^ WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0.7347 OF 2006 Petitioner Shesh Narayan Sandit versus Respondents Petitioner Respondents The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7348 OF 2006 Yogdas Sahu versus The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7349 OF 2006 P^titjoner Respondents Petitioner Moredhwaj Sahu versus The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PET!TION (S.l N0.7350 OF 2006 Toman Lat Chandrakar versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7351 OF 2006 Petitioner Sharda Prasad Tiwari versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.7352 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt.TajinderGill versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.73530F 2QQ6 Petitioner Paras Ram Sahu vereus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7354 OF 2006 Petitioner FeruRam Verma versus Respondents The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETmON (S.l N0.7355 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt. Kirti Shrivastava versus Respondents The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.1 N0.7356 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt. Latita Dewangan vereus Resoondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner Resoondents WRIT PETITION (S.l 3.7357 OF 2006 Smt. Chawant Deshmukh yereus The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another Peh'tioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.73% OF 2MS Ramhan Das Sahu versus Pefltioner Respondents The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh and another And WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.7359 OF 2006 Brij Kishore Sharma versus The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Mr. Somkant Verma, counset for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondente. ORDER (Passed on 4th Day of January, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointty submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present bateh of writ petltions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaf vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anothei1. hsasassi isssMi i sss aMasiia^sa 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. The State Govt. of Chhattlsgarh and anotiiei) and other connected mattere, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pureuant to the memo dated 28-1-19^, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that ttie nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certfficate hotders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. ofChhattisgarh andanothei) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I./D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12- 1998 and 1-3-1999 and farther whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotti Judge 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 Subhash s