1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1515 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.4480 OF 2010 Sou.Shraddha Sharad Bhoi .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1512 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.4785 OF 2010 Shri.Satyavijay Ramchandra Nalawade .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1514 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.4629 OF 2010 Sou.Ranjana Pandurang Manukar .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1516 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.4630 OF 2010 Sou.Vimal Shankar Katwate .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.P.S.Dani i/by Ms.Manjiri Parasnis for the Applicants/petitioners. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 5. Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Sr.Advocate i/by G.H.Keluskar for Respondent Nos.2, 4, 6 & 7. 2 CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 26th July, 2011. P.C.: Civil Applications:- 1515/2011, 1512/2011, 1514/2011 & 1516/2011: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Civil Applications are granted in terms of prayer clauses (a) respectively. Writ Petitions:- 4480/2010, 4785,2010, 4629/2010 & 4630/2010: By these petitions the petitioners are challenging the orders passed by the authorities, recalling the orders by which the plots of the petitioners were regularised. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We have perused the record. Perusal of the record shows that the plots to which these petitions relate are in compulsory open space and therefore, there is no question of regularisation of the structures erected on those plots. Permitting the structure to continue in the compulsory open space would be against the public interest. Petitions therefore have no substance. Petitions are rejected. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)