IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2007 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 178 of 2007 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN MFA.444/2001 Dated 05/01/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS:2nd RESPONDENT & ADDL. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. P.S.SOMANATHAN, S/O.T.G.SUKUMARAN, PUTHENPURAYIL, KATTUNGAL VELI, PUNNAPRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 2. P.S.LEELA, D/O.LATE ARUNDHATHI, KANNITTAYIL HOUSE, PUNNAPRA NORTH P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688 014. 3. P.S.SASIDHARAN, S/O.LATE ARUNDHATHI, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, LAKSHMI NILAYAM, VADACKAL, ALAPPUZHA. 4. S.VASUMATHY, D/O.LATE ARUNDHATHI, PADINJAREKARA HOUSE, KUTHIRAPANTHY WARD, THIRUVAMBADY P.O., ALAPPUZHA-2. 5. VASANTHY.S., D/O.LATE ARUNDHATHI, KANNAMPURAYIDOM, PUNNAPRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-4. 6. RENGANATHAN.S., S/O.LATE ARUNDHATHI, PUTHENPURAYIL, KATTUNGAL VELIYIL, PUNNAPRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-4. 7. P.S.PONNAMMA, D/O.LATE ARUNDHATHI, VARADITHAYIL HOUSE, PUNNAPRA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-4. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SATHEESH RESPONDENTS: APPELLANT & 3RD RESPONDENT --------------------------------------- 1. DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER, STATE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA. 2. C.RAJAPPAN, S/O.K.RAMAN, EDAYIRATHU HOUSE, ERAZHA NORTH P.O., CHETTIKULANGARA, MAVELIKKARA. BY GOVT PLEADER SRI BENNY GERVASIZ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & M.N. KRISHNAN, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- R.P. No 178 of 2007 in M.F.A. No 444 of 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated: 7th June 2007. O R D E R Krishnan, J. This review petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 5.1.2007 and refix the amount of compensation awarded. We had fixed the age of the deceased as 67 years giving clear and cogent reasons and had applied appropriate multiplier of 5. We have taken the income also at Rs 1,500/- than what was fixed by the Tribunal and applied the multiplier of 5 and awarded Rs 60,000/- towards compensation for loss of dependency. There is no error which requires rectification apparent on the face of the record. The review petition lacks merits and it is dismissed. Sd/- K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- M.N. KRISHNAN Judge 07/06/2007 en [true copy]