(^^ *-?^= INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.I W.P. No...........?. -60 /2ooy PETITIONERS: ^y'" ^- •^fy ^,.1-' .\' l.<.^ ^ ^ Barsagade, D/o Late Shri Bodhi Ram Aged about 42 years working as Asst. Teacher, R/o (f ' Bajiraopara, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). ly' Ram Lal Patel, S/o Shri Sadhram Patel, Aged 33 years, Working as Asst. Teacher R/o Parsadih, Tehsil Sarangarh , Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 3. Sarita Gabel W/o Shri Ashok Kumar Gabel, Aged 40 years, Working as Asst. Teacher R/o Sobha Sadan Kotra Road, Tehsil Raigarh Dist Raigarh. (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: l^- State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretaiy ,Public Education Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. District Education officer, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh 3. District collector, Raigarh / Dist-Raigarh. (C.G.) &S.I PETITION UNDER ARTICLES ie OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF LIKE NTURE ETC :- XI-HC-78 *11*1011 ^*T19> 3^ •^W'^^I, wl\wie, RirtKiy . . iAi..f;.C^;.'S^ u WT 2007 311^1 Kd* (Y<!^ct^'ST) ^rfsTOi ;afi^i**<i+ Bablu gTaTWHfStTsn^T 23^.2007 Atr. Harish Uiutia, counsel ffc Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel laNiye^ WHti the consent of learneill are heard finatly and disposed of. Common order dictated in W[P. (.s) No. 366 of 2007 in open Court, pasaed separateiy. qifife^ wRrr'ir'fe^ ^fRre ^srf^ITSn^T r thc petitfoners. fbr ihe respondents/Stote. counsel for fhe parties, the matters SdA Satish K. Judge HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6i4ftH AT MLASPUR W. P.fS) No. 366 <rf 20)7 Petitioner ; Nond Ram Jangade Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & o-thers W. P.fSl No. 368 <rf 2007 Petitioners : Scrita Barsagode and olhers Versus (te^wndents : Slate of Chhattisgorh & o'thcrs /knd W. P.fSJNo. 369 «rf2007 Petitioner : Ram Kumar Putel Wersus Respondents ; State of Oihattisgarh & anol+iw SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agidhotri. J Present: Msr. Harish Khutia, Advocate for the petitfoners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Plo»iellawyer for the respondents/State. OROER 0>assed on 2.3rd dcy of Jamwry, 2007) 1. Lecmed counset oppearing for Ihe petitioners as —ellas for the Statcs/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present urit petitions are similau' 1o that of in W. P. No. 4725/2006 (Am<u- Sai Ram & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh A others), which NNS disposed ®f vide order dated 1.9.2006 (Amexure P/2). They fwther subnut that the question of 1®»Nivolved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed couisel for the parties, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Ihe order ctated 1.92006 pnaBed by Ihis Court m WP. No. 4725/2006. No order astocosts. 3. A copy of •this order be ptaced bn record in oonnected wit petitions. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge