IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 27235 of 2005 BETWEEN: Sri M. Pochi Reddy S/o M. Gopal Reddy, R/o Koheda Vilalge, Hayath Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Saroor Nagar, at Saroornagar Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Station House Officer, Hayath Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Mohd. Ghousuddin Khan, Inspect, of Police Hayath Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in threatening the petitioner and his family members to execute sale deed in favour of private real estate firm and interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners and his family members over the land in Survey No. 24 and 25 admeasuring an extent of Acs.12-00 situated at Koheda village, as illegal, arbitrary unreasonable and violative of Art 14 and 21 of the constitution of India besides being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to threaten the petitioner and his family members any more for doing registration of their land to others and to pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the official respondents in threatening him and his family members to execute the sale deed in favour of private real estate firm and interfering with his peaceful possession over the land in Sy.No.24 and 25 admeasuring 12 acres situated at Koheda village as illegal and arbitrary and to direct the third respondent not to threaten him and his family members any more for doing registration. 2. All the allegations made in the writ affidavit have been denied in the counter filed by the fourth respondent stating that the respondents have never threatened the petitioner or his family members to register their land to others. 3. In view of the denial of all the allegations with regard to the specific relief claimed in the writ petition, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. However, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with civil disputes of the petitioner and not to threaten the petitioner and his family members. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 10, 2008 DSK