1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 682 of 2009 In MCA (St) No. 3716 of 2009 Sau Rama v. Smt Mamta -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr P.R. Patil, Adv for applicant Mr M.R. Johrapurkar, adv for respdt Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 26 th July 2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the application for condonation of delay caused in filing application for review of judgment passed in second appeal, No explanation is given either in the application or during the course of hearing as to why the review application was not filed within reasonable period from 5.2.2009 when the certified copy was obtained. It is the duty of the applicant seeking condonation of delay to put forth adequate and satisfactory reason, leave aside the extent of delay, whether short or long. Even though there is short extent of delay, it cannot be condoned for asking. Application is rejected. 2 Judge. Hsj