IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.2313 of 1979 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.12.2011 &. Regular Second A ppeal No.2710 of 1979 (O&M) Babu Ram ...Appellant versus Shri Chander Parkash and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate,for the appellant. Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for respondents. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) The above two appeals arise out of a common judgment, one filed at the instance of the mortgagor seeking for a redemption and another at the instance of a mortgagee claiming that the right to redeem is lost by the law of limitation. In terms of the law laid down by this Court, both these cases are required to be disposed of. In Ram Kumar and others Versus Mohinder and others in RSA No.2628 of 1982, decided on 08.11.2011, I have held that a suit for redemption cannot be affected by the bar of limitation so long as the Regula r Second Appeal No.2313 of 1979 (O&M) - 2 - right to redeem is not lost by a decree of Court or by act of parties before the institution of suit itself. Both the appeals at the instance of the mortgagor must succeed and are allowed with costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 13.12.2011 sanjeev