IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.474 OF 2007 SUMMONS NO.474 OF 2007 SUMMONS NO.474 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO.930 OF 2006 SUIT NO.930 OF 2006 SUIT NO.930 OF 2006 M/s.Otarmal Kantilal & Co. ...Plaintiff V/s. Chandrakan S. Sakpal & Anr. ...Defendants And S.Shantilal & Anr. ...Respondents And Tata Services Ltd. ...Applicant Ms.Manisha Poladia i/b.M/s.Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for applicant. Mr. Kiran Jain i/b.Tushar Garodia for plaintiff. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR J. : S.J.VAZIFDAR J. : S.J.VAZIFDAR J. DATE DATE DATE : 2ND AUGUST,2007. : 2ND AUGUST,2007. : 2ND AUGUST,2007. P.C. :- 1. It is not necessary to consider prayer (a) of the Chamber Summons as the amounts lying therein have already been deposited. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer (b) and (c). It is clarified that the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer (c) only so far as the prohibitory order dated 17th July, 2006 is concerned. Liberty to the applicant to apply regarding the other prohibitory order dated 28th July, 2006. 2. The plaintiff/decree holder shall be entitled to withdraw the amounts deposited by the applicant in accordance with law. All parties are directed to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate/P.A./P.S. of this court.