Na y” xw 7, , ‘ ’1 mw E ‘ a a L *«RM mgrwxg w H v) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION NO. (OYOF 2003 15’.” MURLIDHAR SON OF SHRI HUNDAMAL AGED 35 YEARS RESIDENT O LAKHE NAGAR RAIPUR 2 SMT ASHA WIFE OF SHRI / MURLIDHAR AGED 34 YEARS RESIDENT OE LAKHE NAGAR, RAIPUR. WE USHI RAM SON O SHRI HARPAL DAS AGED 34 YEARS RESIDENT OF NEAR JHULELAL MANDIR, IDGAH BHATHA, RAIPUR gAE/i’LICANTS/ PLAINTIFFS VERSUS W"NON— E APPLICANT/ DEFENDANT w?“ REVISION PETITION UNDERSECTION Iis OE CODE OE CIVIL PROCEDURE: 1908 / ‘ F F XIvHC-ZZ 200 ;a ’i is ~ ...cat.%lg:..l9s 65- € m Wm mm mmmw WW&‘WW WW ém%nan%w > 09I03Iz005 \ Shri Manila! Sakat, couns‘l ' for the applicants seeks to withdra this application on the ground th t_ the revision is directed against th impugned order by which th iearned appellate Coun set asidet order of temporary injunction pass in faVour Of the applicant by the tri I Court and the revision has no become infructuous as the suit h s been disposed of by the trial Court. Accordingly, the revision s dismissed as having beco e infructuoUs. Sui/- l ‘ DEERENDRA MIsHRAz: /l, Judge (cheatiaa)