HIGHCQLiMTOF_CHHATIISGARH_ATBILASPUR WntPetjtioai (S) No. 4001 of2008 PETITIQNER RESPONDENTS Jay Prakash Yadav, S/'o Girija Singh yadev aged about 20 years; R/o Dhari Basti Bhagoikhar Jemnipali, Dharri, PO, Korba Dist. CG State. VERSUS 1. State ofCG, Thm: Secre'tary, Home Departm.ent/DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. 'Commandant, Home Guards, Bilaspur 'Divisioti, CG State. 3, Dist. Commandaut, Home Guards, Korba Dist. CG State. (WTUT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF n^DIA) (SBs IIoia'ble Mr. Satish K. Agiuhotri, J.) Present : Shri K.R. Nair, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ai'wa Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Pi ^h on t^s 25" day of.My, 2008) 1.. With the conseiit of the t)arties, the matter is taken up for hearing tinal.ly. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 09.04.2008 (Annexure P/l) vvhereby, the petitioner has been asked not tojoin service till a report trom the Assistant Inspector General of Police (Confidential) is received m the oftice. " 3. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the peti.tioner submits that fhe petitioner, after having been selected, has completed three months tra.ini.ng, pursuant to order dated 13.10.2007 (Aniiexure P/3), m th'e month of December, 07. He further submits that the petitioner, thereafter, joined the post and sen'ed for three months. On query, u ..no document m support of the statement vvas produced by the counsel for the petitioiier. 4. On pemsai of order dated 09.04.2.008 (Annexure P/l), it appears that the'petitiotier was not givenjommg and his joining is awaited ti.il receipt of a report from the Assistaet Inspector General of Police (Co.ntideiitiai). •lt does not appear that the respondent denied appointment only joining of the petitioner has been suspended till the Chamcter veritica.tion report is received from the concemed office. 5. There is no infirmity or illegality, warrantmg interference with the impugned order dated 09.04.2008. Thus, fhis petition. is dismissed summanty. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge