IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16999 of 2011 Shailesh Kumar Patel @ Shailesh Patel, S/O-Musafir Patel Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 11.07.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, petitioner as well as other accused sent the informant and several other persons abroad on tourist visa on pretext that they were being sent on work visa. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that Annexure-3 series of the supplementary affidavit reveal that the informant and others had been sent on work visa and not on tourist visa and moreover, one co-accused, having similar allegation, has already been admitted to anticipatory bail by another Bench of this Court which is evident from perusal of Annexure-2 of supplementary affidavit. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 233 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)