:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4056 OF 2006 Laxminarayan Mohanlal Agarwal and ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Kashinath Vishnu Pawar and ors. ..Respondents Mr. P.S. Dani with Mr. H.S. Venegavkar for petitioners. Mr. S.S. Deshmukh for respondent nos.1A, 2A, 3 to 5 and 6A. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : March 14, 2007. Date : March 14, 2007. Date : March 14, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In view of the view taken by me in Writ Petition No. 4138 of 2006 decided on 24/8/2006, this petition challenging the final decree passed by the trial court and confirmed by the Lower Appellate Court under the Rent Act need not be entertained and the petitioner has the alternative remedy of filing a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of C.P.C. . Hence the petition is disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file a Civil Revision Application. :2: Status quo order granted earlier to be continued for a period of two weeks from today. Annexures be returned. . If such a Civil Revision Application is presented within a period of four weeks from today, the period of pendency of this petition shall be taken into consideration for condonation of delay, if any. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)