IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. SUIT No.40 OF 1994. IN PETITION No. 435 of 1994 Manula N. Dawda ..Plaintiff. Vs. Bharat V. Khater ..Caveator. None present for the plaintiff. Caveator present. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. This matter is shown on board under the caption "suit for dismissal". None present for the plaintiff-petitioner. Caveator is present in person. Even on the last date of hearing, i.e. on 17.12.2007, nobody had appeared on behalf of the plaintiff-petitioner In this view of the matter, I have no option other than to dismiss the suit. The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)