1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2010 Willina Sequeria .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Akhilesh Choubey i/b ABG & Associate for the Applicant. Ms R.V. Newton, APP, for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2010 P.C: 1. The applicant/original accused No.2 takes exception to the order dated 5-1-2008 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Railway Mobile Court, Andheri, Mumbai, thereby convicting the applicant under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of the IPC and the order dated 21-12-2009 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the applicant against the order of the learned Magistrate. 2 2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the prosecution has failed to establish any ingredient against the applicant so as to constitute an offence under Section 420 of the IPC. Both the Courts below, on appreciation of evidence, have found that PW-1, PW-2, PW-3 and PW-4 were induced by the accused to part with monies by representing to them that they will be given jobs in Abu Dhabi. Incriminating material has been seized against the present applicant. 3. In that view of the matter, no perversity is disclosed in the impugned orders to warrant interference therein. Hence the revision application is dismissed. 4. In view of dismissal of the revision application, Criminal Application No.52 of 2010 also stands dismissed. B.R. GAVAI, J.