HiGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUPTA, C.J. & j'BLESHRIRANGNATHCHANDRAKAR.J. AppelSants (Claimants) ResDondent 'x ^ 's1. -~ • .^ I.A. (0 No. 58 of2008 1. 2. 3. 3. Ku. Chhaya Khandel, D/o. Shri Jagmohan Khandel, Aged about 16 years, Occupation student, Through : Vali Mother, Siti bai Jagmohan, S/o. Rampratap Khandel, aged about 40 years, Occupatlon Service (C.M;P.I.S.E.C.L. Kudumkela) Siti Bai, W/o. Jagmohan Khandet, aged about 35 years, Occupation House wlfe All of the caste Satnami and R/o. Village Reda, P.S. and Tahsil Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh, (C.G.) VERSUS Mangal Prasad, S/o. Ratthu Ram Yadav, aged about 46 years, R/o. Viilage Kotari, P.S. and Tahsi! Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Offending vehicle Driver) Sanjay Singh, S/o. Rajbali Singh, Occupation Transpori:ing, R/o. Rajunagar, Raigarh, P.S. City Kotwali, Raigarh, Tahsil and Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Owner of the offending vehicle) The New India Insuracne Co. Mumbai, Branch Office Sattigudi Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Insurer of Offending Vehicle) s. Raiu ^ ^. ^•--^' Memorandum of appeal U/S. 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 Present: None for the appellants, Shri H.P.Agarwal, counse! for respondent No.3, ORDER >th (18In March, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta, CJ. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we areieft with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge