HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITON NO. 2366 OF 2005 Thursday, the Tenth day of March, Two Thousand and Eleven Between Sri V.Timothy Paul Petitioner AND The District Collector, Rangareddy District and another Respondents ORDER: Heard. The case of the petitioner is that though he had obtained permission for construction of the building as per the provisions of A.P. Municipalities Act vide proceedings No.G1/150/624/2002 dated 9.7.2003 from the Commissioner, Kukatpally Municipality in respect of Plot Nos. 49 and 50 part of Sy.No. 44, 57, and 58, Old Bowenpally, in respect of the civil dispute relating to the rights and title of the property, the respondents 1 and 2 Revenue Authorities, without assigning any reasons are attempting to interfere with the construction work. This Court while admitting the writ petition, directed that if the construction is proceeded in accordance with the sanctioned plan granted by the Municipality, the respondents shall not interfere with the construction of the petitioner. No counter is forthcoming from the respondents. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 2 not to dispossess the petitioner without following due process of law. No order as to costs. ___________________ Justice V.Eswaraiah March 10, 2011 MAS