IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39536 of 2010 JAI PRAKASH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is shown making demand of ransom complaining thereof, there is no delivery rather he alleged along with co-accused Baleshwar Yadav snatched complainant’s purse having 1500/- and further made demand by co-accused Baleshwar Yadav for Rs. 5000/-. Defence is complete denial with further submission, that irregularities were committed by the complainant, her act was opposed rather complained to C.D.P.O. To create a defence only, the false allegation is levlled that also through complaint petition. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners are allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1673 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Banka subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj (Mandhata Singh, J.)