IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION {LODGING} NO.1921 OF 2008 Shri Sureshkumar D. Singh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Sri N.R. Tiwari for the Petitioner. Sri Milind More, AGP, for the Respondent No.1. Sri A.B. Ketkar for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & SRI A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 12, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. In view of alternative efficacious remedy available to the petitioner under the Electricity Act and particularly before the designated authority under the said Act, we do not find any case for interference in writ jurisdiction. The decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Municipal Corporation of Municipal Corporation of Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/s. Ajanta Iron & Steel Company (Pvt.) Ltd., Delhi v. M/s. Ajanta Iron & Steel Company (Pvt.) Ltd., Delhi v. M/s. Ajanta Iron & Steel Company (Pvt.) Ltd., reported in AIR 1990 SC 882 has absolutely no application to the case in hand wherein the party had first approached the designated authority against whose decision even the appeal was dismissed by the High Court and, therefore, the party had approached the Apex Court. That is not the case in the matter in hand and hence the petition is rejected. (A.A.Sayed, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/A8wpl1921.8 sjs/A8wpl1921.8 sjs/A8wpl1921.8