1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4900 of 2008 Kalimullakha v. State and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.K. Thakkar, Adv for petitioner. Mr F.T. Mirza, Adv for respondent no.2 Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 20th January 2009 Heard Mr R.K. Thakkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr F.T. Mirza, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that son of the petitioner had approached this Court on earlier occasion by filing Writ Petition No. 2492 of 2008 which was permitted to be withdrawn vide order dated 23.6.2008 with direction to present respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 14.1.2008 in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent no.2 has not complied with the said direction and, therefore, present writ 2 petition. Mr F.T. Mirza, learned counsel for respondent no.2 has submitted that if the above-referred representation dated 14.1.2008 has not yet been decided by respondent no.2, the same will be decided at the earliest in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard on its own merit. In view of the statement made by Mr Mirza, no further direction in the present petition at this stage is necessary. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Judge. Judge. hsj