IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3825 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 06, 2010 Baljit Singh. …Petitioner Versus Darshani. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Malkit Singh Jandiala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 02.09.2008 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) Fatehgarh Sahib, as well as, judgment dated 20.05.2009 passed by learned District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, thereby rejecting the application moved by the plaintiff –petitioner seeking ad- interim injunction. C.R. No.3825 of 2009 The brief facts of the present case are that plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance of the contract and in a suit, plaintiff - petitioner has moved application seeking ad- interim injunction for restraining the defendant from alienating the property in question, during the pendency of the suit. In the opinion of this Court, if any transaction is made during the pendency of the suit, the same shall be hit by the principle of lis pendens irrespective of the fact that ad- interim injunction application is dismissed or allowed. Since, any alienation made during the pendency of the suit shall be hit by principle of lis pendens, there is no need to pass any interim order. Petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. October 06, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2