MC 2187/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Heard Mr. GN Sahewalla, learned Sr counsel assisted by Mr. N.A. Singh, learned c ounsel for the applicants and Mr. AM Buzarbaruah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. By this application, the applicants have prayed for vacation/modification/alte ration of the interim order dated 12.8.09 passed in WP ( C) No. 3315/09. The op erative part of the interim order is quoted below : In the interim, it is provided that the work order pursuant to the tender noti ce No.NZR/MM/SUR-CONT/ELECT/DGSETS/13/2008-09/ R 16 SC 08024 shall not be issued , if the same has not been issued as on today Mr. Sahewalla submits that although all the tenderes were asked to produce cert ain documents except the petitioner other tenderers complied with the said commu nication but the petitioner did not submit the required document and his technic al bid was rejected. It is further contended that the tender was for supply of 1 8 D.G. Sets out of which 13 Nos. are of 62.5 KVA and the remaining were for 10 KVA capacity. It is submitted that there is a blanket restrain order for procu ring the D.G. Sets by the respondents which are proposed to be procured by the NIT. It is contended that before passing of the interim order only one tender wa s allowed to supply one DG Set of 62.5 KVA and 17 D.G. sets are yet to be proc ured from the successful tenderers. It is submitted that the petitioner quoted for supply of only one DG Set of 62.5 KVA. In that view of the matter I do not find any justification for continuation of the interim order in respect of the D .G. Sets, beyond one only for which the petitioner tendered. Accordingly, it is ordered that the interim order would be operative only in res pect of the one DG Set and the applicants/respondents would be at liberty to pr ocure remaining 16 (sixteen) other DG Sets from the successful tenderers. Misc. case stands disposed of.