THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.3658 OF 2011 ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 8-4-2011 in E.P.No.54 of 2010 in O.S.No.121 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapali, wherein the attachment of salary of petitioners/judgment debtors 2, 4, 5 and 6, was ordered in execution of the decree for recovery of Rs.1,67,795/-. Heard both sides. Perused the record. The impugned warrant of attachment, while mentioning the total amount due under the decree is Rs.1,62,795/-, has further stated that the salary of the petitioners-judgment debtors shall be attached after making necessary deductions, as per the provisions of Section 60 CPC. The employer-garnishee is, therefore, liable to deduct only that portion of the salary, which is attachable after making necessary deductions in terms of Section 60 CPC. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that attachment of the salary was ordered contrary to the provisions of Section 60 CPC, is untenable. The other contention that the decree holder is not entitled to proceed against the petitioners without proceeding first against the principal borrower-the first judgment debtor, is equally untenable for the reason that the decree fastens joint and several liability on all the judgment debtors and the decree holder is entitled to proceed against any or some of them for recovery of the amount due under the decree. In the circumstances, the impugned order does not call for any interference by this Court. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J rkk Dated: 6-9-2011