IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 66 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 66 OF 2006. Shri Shyam Bhatia. ... Petitioner. V/s. State of Maharashtra & ors ... Respondents. None for the petitioner. Ms.Mamta Sadh, A.G.P. for the State. Ramesh Cheulkar for the caveator. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 25th January 2006. 25th January 2006. 25th January 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . None for the petitioner. 2. Having gone through the petition with assistance of the learned counsel for the respondents, no fault can be found with the impugned order. There is no material on record to show that the petitioner has been declared as insolvent. In that view of the matter, the first part of prayer (a) cannot be granted. 3. So far as attachment of properties of other family members is concerned, it would be open for them to challenge the attachment in accordance with law. 4. No other relief is claimed. No case is made out to entertain this petition. 5. Petition is, thus, dismissed in limine. *****