THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.4632 of 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order and decree dated 20.07.2009 passed in R.C.A.No.5 of 2008 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Appellate Court of Rent Control Cases, Visakhapatnam, confirming the order dated 28.01.2008 passed in R.C.C.No.34 of 2004 by the Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. The petitioner and the respondent are sister and brother respectively. The petitioner filed R.C.C.No.34 of 2004 on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, seeking fixation of fair rent of the schedule property and to direct the respondent to deposit the same into the Court. The trial Court, after consideration of the oral and documentary evidence, returned the said case directing the petitioner to present the same before the proper forum in proper form, within one month from that date. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed R.C.A.No.5 of 2008 and the appellate Court, on re- appreciation of the entire evidence and perusal of the material available on record, dismissed the appeal confirming the order passed in R.C.C.No.34 of 2004. Aggrieved by the same, the present civil revision petition has been filed. 3. Both the Courts below, on consideration of material available on record, concurrently held that the petitioner failed to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties to maintain the case under Rent Control Act and that a title dispute is also pending between the parties before the Apex Court. In view of the said concurrent findings arrived at by the Courts below, I find no reason to interfere with the same. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:09.10.2009 sj