IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 9097 of 2008 Between: Kavati Rajjappa, S/o. K.S. Hanumappa, R/o. Seethanagaram, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Superintendent of Police, Guntur District. 2 Sub-Inspected of Police, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3 The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. 5 Yarrasi Koteswara Rao, S/o. Punnaiah, R/o. Gopala Reddy Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 6 G.L. Mallikarjuna Rao, S/o. Sreeramudu, R/o. Governorpet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 7 Yannamaneni Venkata Rao, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, R/o. Govindarajulu Street, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 8 Desu Rajend Rajendra Prasad, S/o. Bala Gurunadam, R/o. Govindarajulu Street, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 9 Chinnipothula Subba Rao, S/o. Ramulu, R/o. Seethanagaram, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. 10 Chinnipothula Durga Rao, S/o. Nagulu, R/o. Seethanagaram, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 in not taking action against the unofficial respondents in spite of representations and complaints including private complaint made by petitioner as illegal, arbitrary a n d violative of Article 14, 21 and 300(A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent 1 to 4 to take action against the unofficial respondent and to give protection to my property and life and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MEHERCHAND NOORI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 9097 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: It is represented by Sri K. Ramakrishna Rao, learned counsel representing Sri Meherchand Noori, learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the fact that a final report has been filed by the Police before the Court of concerned learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mangalagiri, the grievance in the writ petition does not subsist. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 09-07-2008 Pvks/*