c^^i @ ^hk^ RSO ^ ^ .^ IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. r^C^OF 2009 PETITIONER ^ y ^'T",^^>- Dr. Sayed Riyaz Anwar, S/o Shri H.R. Sayed, aged about 29 years, Occupation Student, presently ^^\x^^ '-''' studying in J.N.M Medical ^, s'\^ w;;^^ Vs RESPONDENTS (^A€--1 ^sc^ •nAE^" \^ College, Raipur, R/o Shivanand Nagar, Khamtari, Raipur, (CG) lr Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Health, New Delhi 2.-State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Department of Medical Education, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Director Medical ^fci' •t^v CC^<- .^^mf^ (^^-<^, y/' ._\^ ^ I 1 ® ^ ^Z-y^j ftx-^. ^^. !!!^7^^ ^ ^ ^ ..^ ^' ^^' y:&' Education, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, through its Controller, C/168, Tagore Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Medical Council of India, through its Secretary, Evan-E, Galib Marg, Kotla Road,New Delhi PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGHCOURrOFCHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR W. P. (C) No. 3067 of 2009 Petitioner Dr. Sayed Riyaz Anwar Versus Respondents Union of India & otliers ^ WRIT PETITON UNDER ART1CLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTmTION OF INDIA DB: Hon'ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'ble Mr. N. K. Agarwal, JJ. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Maaish Sharoia, Advocate on tlie authority of Shri Kashtf Shakeel, Advocate for tlie respondent No.1. Shri Yashwaiit Siagh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents No. 2 aiid 3/State. Ms Itu Raiii Mukharjee, Advocate for tlie respondent No.4. Shri Dhu'aj Waiikhede, Advocate for fhe respondent No.5. ORDBR ( Passed on tbis 29th day ofJune, 2010 ) Per !. M. Qiiddnsi, J. 1. Heai'd leaiiied coiuisel appearing for the petitioner as weU. as leaiiied counsel appearing for tlie respondents. 2. This writ petition has been tlied with fhe foUowiiig prayer : "10.2 This Hon'ble court may kmdly be pleased to quash fhe counseliiig held on 30/05/2009 held for the admissiou m Degree/Diplonia Course of Medical Education for Academic Year 2009. 10.3 This Hont)le court nxay kmdly be pleased to aUow tlie petitioner to take part m tiie coimselnig for two seats of DMRD. " 3. The matter relates to admission in. Pre-PG Degree^ Diploma Courses of flie yeai' 2009. The counselmg was done on 30th May, 2009 wifhout shownig two seats of Diploma ia Radiology (fbr sfaort \.^ y^.' ^ '^ f...-r' ^' 'DMRD"), The surrender of tvvo seats of All India Quota was made but the counselbig was not conducted. Thozigh tliis Court feels that fhe respondeiits have uot acted properly but at tiiis stage no retiefcaa be granted to tlie petitioner, as fhe writ petition has become iafructuous. Therefore, flie writ petition is disinissed as haviiig beconie iafructiious. No order as to costs. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge ThaJmr