IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.11.2017 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.23063 of 2004 E.Sidheeswaran ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector/ The Inspector of Muthukalipatty Panchayat, Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2. The President, Muthukalipatty Panchayat, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. 3. The Tahsildar, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to forthwith pass orders in respect to proceedings of removing the 2nd respondent from Muthukalipatty Village Panchayat pursuant to the Report of the 3rd respondent and consequently forbear the 2nd respondent from convening any meeting of the Muthukalipatty Village Panchayat till the completion of the proceedings. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Arul Murugan For Respondents : Mr.S.Diwakar, Special Government Pleader http://www.judis.nic.in S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. (aeb) O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect. 2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected W.P.M.P.No.27892 of 2004 and W.V.M.P.No.513 of 2005 are closed. 23.11.2017 (aeb) To: 1. The District Collector/ The Inspector of Muthukalipatty Panchayat, Namakkal District, Namakkal. 2. The President, Muthukalipatty Panchayat, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. 3. The Tahsildar, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. Order in W.P.No.23063 of 2004 http://www.judis.nic.in