IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WA.No. 2816 of 2007 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.18371/2007 Dated 24/10/2007 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- SRI. SOBHICHEN ABRAHAM, (GENERAL CONVENER), ACTION COUNCIL, ERAVIKULANGARA HOUSE, DEVAGIRI P.O., KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, POWER (C) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES), CORPORATE OFFICE, SAUDHAMANI PLOT NO.2, SECTION 29, GURGAON, HARIYANA. 3. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. C.K.KARUNAKARAN. BY ADV. SRI. MILLU DANDAPANI. BY GOVT. PELADER SRI. M.P. SREEKRISHNAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K.M. JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WRIT APPEAL No. 2816 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of November, 2007. JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, CJ, Drawing of electric line through the properties of the petitioner was the subject matter of a writ petition. The learned Single Judge while entertaining the writ petition had directed the expert body to submit its report. Pursuant to the directions so issued, the expert body thereafter has submitted its report. Basing on that report, the learned Single Judge has opined that the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. 2. We have carefully gone through the order passed by the learned Single Judge. In our opinion the learned Judge had rightly rejected the writ petition keeping in view the opinion of the expert body. Therefore, interference with the said order is not called for. Therefore, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE sb/DK.