IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7290 of 2009 JAGDISH KAMTI, SON OF LATE DULAR KAMTI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BASUDEVA, VIA MATHAI, P.S. – BASUDEVA, P.O. – BASUDEVA, DISTRICT - MADHEPURA Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY-CUM-COMMISSIONER URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 3. THE COLLECTOR-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER. 4. THE CHAIRMAN, MUNGER NAGAR PARISHAD, MUNGER. 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MUNGER NAGAR PARISHAD, MUNGER ----------- 2. 01.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the retiral dues as indicated in Paragraph-1 of the writ petition as well as his representation dated 28th of February 2009 as contained in Annexure-2. In the above circumstances, Counsel for the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.5. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks alongwith certified copy of the present order, the respondent no. 5 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner with regard to retiral dues in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a - 2 - period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)