IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 237 of 2005 Between: Chamarthi Komala W/o.Pardhananda Prasad Nellore Dist A.P. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P. Revenue Department, Duly rep by its Secretary to the Govt., Secretriat Buildings, Hyderabad A.P., 2 The District Collector Nellore, Nellore Town,Nellore Dist A.P., 3 The Revenue Divisional Office Kavali Revenue Division, Kavala, Nellore District 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kaligiri Mandal,Kaligiri, Nellore District, A.P. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records and to quash the impugned notice No. 208/2004 dt 5-8-2004 issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer Kaligiri Mandal Kaligiri,Nellore Dist,A.P.,i.e. the 4th Respondent herein. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.CHANDANA MADALA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court, at the admission stage, made the following: ORDER: Questioning the impugned notice issued by the fourth respondent – Mandal Revenue Officer in R.C.No.208/2004, dated 05-08-2004, calling for the explanation of the petitioner as to why the assignment granted in her favour in respect of Ac.5.00 cents of dry land in Survey No.21 of East Dubagunta Village, Kaligiri Mandal of Nellore District, should not be cancelled on the ground of violation of assignment conditions, the petitioner filed the present writ petition stating that without passing orders on the explanation dated 22-09-2004 submitted by her to the impugned notice, the respondents are taking coercive steps for cancelling her patta and evicting her from the land in question. Hence, the writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and with their consent, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage. 3. Having regard to the fact that the explanation stated to have been submitted by the petitioner to the impugned notice is pending consideration with the fourth respondent, I deem it appropriate to direct the fourth respondent to consider the explanation of the petitioner dated 22-09-2004 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. Till passing of such orders, status quo existing as on today with respect to possession of the land in question shall be maintained. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J January 19, 2005 MRR / TVK ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER Copy to: 1 The Secretary to the Government, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, A.P., 2 The District Collector Nellore, Nellore Town, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh 3 The Revenue Divisional Office, Kavali Revenue Division, Kavali, Nellore District, A.P., 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kaligiri Mandal, Kaligiri, Nellore District, A.P. 5 Two C.C. s to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 6 Two C.D. Copies.