IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5811 of 2009 Decided on : 09.10.2009 Ramesh Kumar ... Petitioner versus Meer Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Suryakant Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order dated 11.09.2009, whereby the evidence of the petitioner-plaintiff has been closed by the Trial Court. Though from the sketchy details available, it is clearly a case where the petitioner has taken almost six years to prove his assertions, yet in the interest of justice, I deem it appropriate to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner to lead his entire evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter is now fixed for 15.10.2009 for rebuttal evidence and no evidence has been led by the respondents up till now. In these circumstances, ld. Trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to the petitioner for leading entire evidence on the said date viz 15.10.2009 on his own responsibility. It is made clear that no further opportunity would be CR No.5811 of 2009 -2- granted to the petitioner for this purpose. This revision petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given under the signature of Court Secretary. October 09, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE