IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2008 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 9227 of 2008(W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SIVASHANKAR, S/O.KOLLAYYA KOKKAL HOUSE, NEERCHAL POST KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KASARGOD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.9227/2008-W: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE PERMIT DTD. 19/03/2003. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE PASS BOOK. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD. 07/03/2007. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 17/05/2007. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REGISTERED LAWYER NOTICE DTD. 13/02/2008. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE POSTAL ENVELOPE CONTAINING THE ENDORSEMENT. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 06/03/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 9227 OF 2008 - W = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th May, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that Ext. P8 application made by him for renewal of his regular permit has not been considered so far. Learned Govt. Pleader, on instruction, submits that Ext. P8 has not been received. Though the petitioner seeks to contradict the submission made by the learned Govt. Pleader, in the absence of any proof to disprove the statement of the Learned Government Pleader, I am not in a position to accept the submission made by the petitioner. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to make yet another application for renewal of his permit and further directing that in the event of receipt of such an application the same will be considered in accordance with law, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-