IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14098 of 2009 Between: 1 G. Adeppa, S/o. G. Anjinaiah, R/o. Chinna Pendekal, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 G. Narasanna, S/o. G. Anjinaiah, R/o. Chinna Pendekal, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 3 G. Govindu, S/o. G. Anjinaiah, R/o. Chinna Pendekal, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 4 G. Venkateswarlu, S/o. G. Anjinaiah, R/o. Chinna Pendekal, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 5 G. Hanumappa, S/o. G. Anjinaiah, R/o. Chinna Pendekal, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 6 G. Dasappa, S/o. G. Anjinaiah, R/o. Chinna Pendekal, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector (Social Welfare), Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 3 The Tahsildar, Adoni, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the proceedings Rc.H/138/2008 dated 06-12-2008 to register the land of the petitioners in Sy.No. 501/1A to an extent of Ac. 0.92 cents of China Pendekal Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District in the name of the Government without issuing any notification under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act and passing of consent award without following the procedure as contemplated under the A.P. Land Acquisition Negotiation Rules, 1992 R/w Instructions contained in G.O.Ms.No. 1050 dated 17-10-1992 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and conequenty set aisde teh proceedings issued by the 1st respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : .. ORAL ORDER: The petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition with a view to seeking an appropriate remedy by way of a suit for declaration of title or any other appropriate strategy, before a civil court of competent jurisdiction or any other alternative forum. Granting liberty as sought for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 15.7.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 14098 of 2009. Dated: 15.7.2009.