1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.7089 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.7089 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.7089 OF 2005. Anup Ramanlal Dhuwad & ors. : Petitioners. versus Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation & others. : Respondents. Shri S.P.Thorat, Advocate, for the Petitioners. Shri A.S.Rao, Advocate, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Shri C.U.Singh i/by Shri M.D.Nagle, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 4 to 11. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 31st AUGUST 2006. DATED : 31st AUGUST 2006. DATED : 31st AUGUST 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned advocate appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that the representations made by the petitioners, copies of which are annexed at Exhibits K to K4 to the petition, would be decided after hearing the parties in accordance with the provisions of law within a period of twelve weeks from today. We accept the said statement. In view of the said 2 2 2 statement, the learned advocate for the petitioner crave leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Court in case a need arises. 2. While accepting the said statement made on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the said liberty. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the points which are sought to be raised through this petition. We expect Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to deal with the representations in accordance with the provisions of law. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J] [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J] [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J]