1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.483 OF 2008 Mr.Vyankatnarayn Vyangai Shankar .. Applicant Versus Mr.Chandrakant Shivaji Bhalerao & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.B.K.Raje for the applicant. Mr.Sagar Joshi for respondent no.1. Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, A.P.P for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd June 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant pointed out that the applicant has deposited a sum of Rs.7,000/- in this Court and a sum of Rs.27,400/- with the Sessions Court. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent on instructions of the 1st respondent who is 2 stated to be present in the Court states that if the 1st respondent is permitted to withdraw the aforesaid amounts, he is agreeable for compounding of the offence against the applicant. The advocate for the applicant has no objection for permitting withdrawal. 2. In view of these statements, the revision application is disposed of by passing following order: : O R D E R : (a) The impugned judgments and orders are quashed and set aside and the offence stands compounded. (b) By consent, the 1st respondent is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.7,000/- deposited by the applicant in this Court as well as a sum of Rs.27,4000/- deposited by the applicant with the Sessions Court at Pandharpur. (c) The concerned Courts to act upon authenticated copy of this order and will permit withdrawal of the amounts on the basis 3 of authenticated copy of this order. (d) Criminal Application No.513 of 2008 does not survive and the bail bonds of the applicant stand cancelled. (A.S.OKA,J)