IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37035 of 2009 RAM PASWAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 6.4.2010 KHAN Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the bail application of petitioner no.2 Laksham Paswan as he has already been taken into custody. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4 namely Ram Paswan, Lalo Paswan and Raben Paswan apprehend their arrest in a case under sections 364, 366, 376, 302, 201, 120(B) of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the main allegation is attributed against accused Bom Paswan, Shambhu Paswan and Krishna Mohan Prasad who are alleged to have taken away the victim girl. He further submits that from perusal of the case diary it would appear that no witness has stated that they saw these petitioners with the accused persons or with the victim girl any time. In fact no allegation has been attributed against these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 namely Ram Paswan, Lalo Paswan and Raben Paswan are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest/surrender, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S.Case No.191 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -