CWP No.11698 of 2009.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11698 of 2009 Date of decision : 17.05.2010 Mrs. Bulbul Dhar James ...Petitioner Versus Development Credit Bank and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate, With Mr. Sanjiv and Rohit Suri, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 23.6.2009 (Annexure P-1), issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon, on the request of respondent No.1 proposing to take physical possession of her house with the help of police. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that the account of the petitioner has been regularized and, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. This position has not been disputed 1 CWP No.11698 of 2009.doc by the learned counsel for the petitioner. She however, states that the petitioner be granted liberty to move respondent No.1 for splitting the loan account of respondent No.2. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies available to her in accordance with law. May 17, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2