C.R. No.2607 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2607 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 6.8.2010 Shanti Devi ……Petitioner VERSUS Rattan Chand and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Padam Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aarti Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging the judgment dated 1.4.2009 passed by Addl. District Judge, Patiala, whereby allowing the appeal filed by the defendants/respondents against the judgment of the learned trial Court whereby the learned trial Court has granted ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff/petitioner. C.R. No.2607 of 2009 (O&M) -2- 2. Learned first Appellate Court vide impugned judgment declined to issue any injunction in favour of the plaintiff/petitioner and against the defendants/respondents to restrain them from raising any construction. 3. Both the learned Counsel appearing before this Court fairly stated that any construction raised during the pendency of the suit is always subject to the decision of the suit. Both the Counsel, however, stated that hearing of the suit be expedited. 4. In view of the above, petition is dismissed. However, learned trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the suit. Learned trial Court is requested not to grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the party. ( ALOK SINGH ) 06th August, 2010 JUDGE ashish