IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 820 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 19, 2010 Union of India and others …Appellants Versus Ex Hav. Jagir Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: None. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 25.9.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 5000 of 2005. The learned Single Judge has placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Union of India v. Ex Sepoy Ranjit Singh (LPA No. 547 of 2001, decided on 11.2.2009). The issue raised and decided in the aforesaid appeal was that the invalidation on account of Generalised Seizure was found to be attributable or aggravated by military service and consequently the disabled army personnel was found entitled to disability pension. The aforesaid factual and legal position was not seriously disputed by the Union of India. Accordingly, the writ petition has been allowed. Feeling aggrieved, the Union of India has approached this Court by filing the instant appeal. We find no distinguishable facts warranting admission of the instant appeal. The matter is covered by the judgment of the Letters Patent LPA No. 820 of 2010 (O&M) Bench in Ex Sepoy Ranjit Singh’s case (supra). Consequently, it is held that the disability of the petitioner was attributable to military service and he is entitled to military pension from the date of discharge from military service in terms of the report of the Medical Board. The appeal fails and the same is dismissed. In view of the fact that the appeal itself has been dismissed on merit, we do not feel the necessity of passing any order in the miscellaneous applications filed along with the appeal. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) July 19, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2