-1- SAW No.399/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.399 of 2009 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5303 of 2008 Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Jaipur and Another VERSUS Lachchi Ram Sharma son of Shri Kalyan Sahai Sharma Date of Order :::: 27/05/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Raghuvendra S. Rathore Mr. S.N. Kumawat, Counsel for the Appellants Mr. Amit Ratnawat, on behalf of Mr. R.B. Mathur, Counsel for the respondent *** Per Court : Matter comes up on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. We have on the request of the learned counsel for the parties also examined the matter on merits. We find from the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17.09.2008, which is impugned in the present appeal that only direction given by the learned Single Judge to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization from the date, the similarly situated persons are given benefit of regularization by way of screening expeditiously. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the case of the petitioner does not merit consideration and as he was not eligible. So far as the aforesaid contention is concerned, it is always open for the appellants to consider the case in the light of the directions issued and pass an appropriate order giving -2- SAW No.399/2009 reasons. In view of the above, we find no reason to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge. The application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act as well as the appeal and the stay application are accordingly disposed of. (Raghuvendra S. Rathore), J. (Dalip Singh) J. Ashok/