ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 1976 OF APPEAL NO. 1976 OF APPEAL NO. 1976 OF 2003 2003 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Nitin Mulye i/by Mr. G.S.Godbole for the applicants. Mr. K.K.Tated, AGP for the state. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 19th September, 2007. : 19th September, 2007. : 19th September, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Court on 20th February, 2006 has allowed the applicant to withdraw the amount on following condition:- . The applicants are allowed to withdraw the amount on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicants shall also execute a undertaking that in case the Appeal is allowed they would refund the ( 2 ) amount alongwith interest or in such manner as directed by this Court. The withdrawal is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both sides. Civil application disposed of." 2. By order dated 23/03/2006 the Second Additional District Judge, Nashik, however ordered the claimants to furnish Bank guarantee for the value of 50% amount and personal bond for the value of balance 50% amount. 3. The order passed by the High Court is very clear. The Court, therefore, need not insist on any additional condition other than ordered by the High Court as referred above. 4. In view of this observation, the Civil application is disposed of. ( 3 ) [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]