IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1267 of 2008(V) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27909/2008 Dated 19/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER / 3RD RESPONDENT. ------------------------------------------------------------ THE SECRETARY, EDVANNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH EDAVANA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KUNHU MARAKKAR, S/O.AHAMMED KUTTY, MANAGING PARTNER, HASEENA SAW MILL, RESIDING AT VAYALILAKATH, AYYANTHORE, EDAVANNA, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D., ROAD, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SUDHA DEVI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- R.P No.1267 of 2008 in W.P(C ) No.27909 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 4th December, 2008 O R D E R I heard learned counsel for the review petitioner and learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 2. The direction issued in my judgment dated 19.9.2008 was one to the Panchayat to look into Exhibit P4 marked in the writ petition and to take appropriate action in the light of Exhibit P5. Exhibit P4 in the writ petition was a request to the Panchayat to remove what he termed as unauthorized construction by way of bus waiting shed situate in front of his saw mill. Exhibit P5 in the writ petition was a communication issued by the Executive Engineer of the PWD requiring the Panchayat to take steps to shift the waiting shed to another convenient place after getting permission from the PWD Department. R.P No.1267 of 2008 in W.P(C ) No.27909 of 2008 2 3. The direction issued by me only requires the Panchayat to take action in the light of Exhibit P5. I do not find any grounds to review the judgment. Review petition is therefore dismissed. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma R.P No.1267 of 2008 in W.P(C ) No.27909 of 2008 3 R.P No.1267 of 2008 in W.P(C ) No.27909 of 2008 4