IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 14874 of 2009 Between: 1 Peetha Narasimha Raju, S/o. Peetha Venkata Chalama Raju, R/o. Halia Village, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 Peetha Chittamma, W/o. Peetha Narasimha Raju, R/o. Halia Village, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, 2 The Inspector of Police, Halia Circle, Nalgonda District. 3 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Halia Police Station, Anumula Mandal, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the 2009 respondents in not taking action and not enquiring into petitioner complaints dated 5-7-2009 and 10-7-2009 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to enquire into petitioners complaint dated 10-7- 2009 and take suitable action as per the investigation and provide protection petitioner his wife Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.K.SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.14874 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 This Writ Petition is filed praying for the following relief. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the 2009 respondents in not taking action and not enquiring into petitioner complaints dated 5-7-2009 and 10-7-2009 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to enquire into petitioners complaint dated 10-7-2009 and take suitable action as per the investigation and provide protection petitioner his wife and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 This court by order dated 24.7.2009 directed the Superintendent of Police Nalgonda to cause a detailed enquiry into the matter and submit a report. Accordingly, the Superintendent of Police Nalgonda submitted a report. 3 Having considered the submissions and also looking at the case record, this court feels very sorry for the entire affair. The fight or litigation is between the father and the mother on one side and the two sons on the other side. This court does not want to express any view for the reason that the Criminal petitions filed by the sons to quash the proceedings before the S.H.O. Halia and the suits which also were instituted by the sons are pending before the competent civil court. Now that the Superintendent of Police Nalgonda submitted a report stating that the Writ Petitioners i.e. father and mother are provided with necessary security i.e. one Head Constable, one Police Constable and one Home Guard with instructions to keep survivelance of movements of all rivals to them, this court is of the view that this Writ Petition can be closed. Further, the complaint of the Writ Petitioners, originally, is that though they approached the police and gave report as early as on 05.07.2009 and also on 10.7.2009, no crime has been registered. Now the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, stated that from the report submitted by the Superintendent of Police Nalgonda it can also be gathered that a case in Cr.No.160 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC has already been registered. In that view of the matter, this court is of the view that no further orders need be passed in the Writ Petition and accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No orders as to costs. ---------------- 10.08.2009 kvsn