^-b- A^fl^' t-t^exA ^' AMENDEnWRTT PETITION #' IN THE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. Petitioner .i \-;' WP (S) No.1516 OF 2009 :: Ramakant Sharma S/o. Late B.L.Sharma, aged 53 years, R/o. Village Lakha Shar, Post Office" Kathakoni, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Occupation Workitig as Inspector of Police, Presently posted as Station House Officer, Police Station Rainanuj Nagar, Police District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Departraent of Home (Police) Mantralaya, DKS, Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) Director General of PoUce, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (C.G.) 3) Electipn Commission of India, through Secretary Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi- 110001 India. WRIT PBTTnON UNDER ARTIGLES 226 OF THE COWSTnTlTT^ONOFIJWDIA.FOR ISSUANGE OF W^ IN TlEm NATUSE^JOF MANDAMUS, CERTIORAm, PROHlBIllON. DIRECTtON OR OICT>ERETC. ., Ar. ^ ^ySWHC—JS lil»ill<> :" \^'.5 3!7^F ^il ft;-(ii* Tiqisn^lsEffW "3^ '::qpfRT?r, 9-Sww, f^cTOTgT _.ua^.....l.^i^..^.-...... ^ 3^'^fSR C^^y, •S^iIWBfet 3B^! M!-'-: Mr. Uttam Pandey c^uns M.P.S. petitioner. jente/StE cfsunsel for th hatia Pl for the res; Counsel for th-e pelftioner submits that in the present petition he is challenging Ipie order dated 18.9.2008 by which the sr has bee qiwfepftt ^ro?if 4 teet'TfSn^ ^3ifin3T!^r •ansferred from Surajpur to Dantev/ada. He submN that earlier aiso representation to the autilority concerned but the same has not been decided ancj meanwhile there are further developments in his difficijilty like sickness of his mother ete. vvhich he wants to briny to the notice of the authority concerned by making anbther representation and with this liberty he wants to withdr^vv this petition. He further submits that as he has approache^f this Court the authority concerned may take a vindictive attittide against him. However, counsel for the respondents/Sta^e submits that it is merety an apprehension on the part| of the petitioner and the authority shai'i not be vindictive tow^rds him. Accordingiy, the peti&'on is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. It is directed that if any representation is es»ry-^^.^^^;f: w sn^i ^i ft-fi'* ^T Sn^?T s>*f nr^ .^s^-. ^ 'S'si •^w\»<i, &-^wi<o,hwwy. *<I*ICTI a»*nq» "W( 200 ^fll^t't^? (l?Is'!"<?) 5«lNR'-yf^I <*fl^ —2 fiied by the petitioner within authority concerned shall therein and decide the same weeks, strictly in accordance this Court has not expressed 4 jthree weeks from today, the cor(sider all the points so raised Vi/ithin a further time of three lifl/ith law. Needless to say that [ny opinion on the merits of the r-aso qn*i?cii<1'l Tiltl?ff "^ l^zl' <Fq«ci< "^ offa*i drtr^ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge WU'S\<1 ^sfll ils;°ll<W <l«l-li<;'IW—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000.