t-@C-78 ^^^:m?Tc5^, y-^^^J^, fqrtl^^ *IMC»Ia?TTq? 3TT^?Tq?Tf^ltcp cTansn^^Tawcp |»NNNf 3n^?Tiracf?((3clfg6Hs) ^200 ?^TW^rf^T3TT^$T ^l^fri41'1 ^HriT^(^t<S1 '(fyt^l^ ^3Tf^T3TT^$T PBTITIONER RESPONDBNTS 1. 2. 3. t.P. (Sl No.6704/2008 Mifhileshwari Sharaia, D/o Shri Vijay Sharma, aged about 35 years, R/o PWD io.3, Police Liae, Sector-6, Kotwaii, BhUai, Veijsus Stat^ of Chhattisgarh, through fhe Secretaxy Dep^rtment of Pmaace, D, K. S. Bhawaii, Raipur Dire btor, Chhattisgarh Professional Exa4iiaation Board, Raipur (CG) Co223|missioner, Local Fund Auditor, Directorate Locs|l Fuud Auditor B-99, Main Road, Sainta Coloji (CG)[ ty Near Dr, Paadey Nursiag Home, Raipur Wmr PBTITION UNDBR ARtICLB 226 OF THB CON8TITUTIONOTtJNDIA SB^ HON. SHRI DHIRBND: 02-12-2008 StAMI8HRA,J Shri P.S. Koshy, cou^isel for fhe petitioner. Snit. Smita Ghai, Pajjiel Law}rer for fhe State. Heard. The petitioner by th<^ iastaat petition is praymg for direction to the respondents to consid^r the case of flie petitioner for appoiatment to the post ofAssistaiit Au^itor. Grievaace of the pel tJie advertisement of Ann conducted for recniitmenl ^itioner is fliat fhe petitioner in response to sxure P-1, pardcipated ia ftie exaiaination of Assistaat Auditor. In the overaU merit ^ ^... • S? J ':^^,.,,^' @, ^x^^nzn^j y-^^^i<A, toRrg? m*i^i a»^rq? W^^Tcinf^Tfc^ ^IT3T1^9Tfl^tcp 3T1^?T q?cp (ijclijcj^) ^F[200 ?^HSR^rf^T3TT^$T -Z-- unreserved female categoiyj Anupaina Sharma, who ^ categoiy as both ofthein s^ marks obtained by Anupf <bl^fri41'i ^l^riT^'fet^ '(fui^l^ <R 3Tf^T 3H^$T Mst, her name appeared at ^20th raak, whex^eas in the Gender Raiik for she was placed at 12th raiik aloug with one as also placed at 12th raak ia tlie same cured equal inarks. However, ou account of ta Shanna ia degree coux^e, she was placed at serial No,12 aiid fhe ^etitioner was^placed ia waiting Mst No<l. However, out of total nui^iber of 32 seats of fhe uureserved female category, 4 caadidates did| of Assistaiit Auditor are ^ not joiii despite their selection aiid 4 seats tUl vacaat in unreserved female categoiy. However, the rcspondents ^re not consideiing 1±iecase ofthe petitioner for appointoaient to the representation of Annexur^ Leamed counsel for post of Assistant Auditor despite her P-3 m fhis regard, tlie petitioner subniits that tliis petitioa may be disposed of wifh direjction to tlie respondents to consider the reprcsentation of the petit^oner withiii tiie specified period as fhe time offhe validity ofselection Ijist is only for one & halfyear. Leamed counsel for |ttie State subxnits that in case fhe petitioner files fresh representation | respondent No.l along ^) considex'ed aad decided l| law, ou its own merits, wil receipt of representation. In vie\v of ftie abc| parties, the iastaiit petitio( to file a fresh representati^ for redressal of her grievaaces before the [ith copy of this order, fhe saiae shatl be ^y fhe respondent No.l in accordance wifh Lhia a period of fhree weeks from tiie date of >ve siibniission of learaed counsel for the a is disposed ofwith Uberty to tlie petitioner in before tlie respondent No. 1 for redressal of ^€i24,"'% y/' "'% ^ f •sv&-Sw-!!:'':v^'-'^ vj^ ^i<yici^, ^^pre, f^ra^ *i 1*101 a?<nq? 3TT^5Tcfnf^7fc^ cT2Tr3TT^^T9^Tr^| 3TT^?T q^cp (^cl^d^) ^200 ?^TTW^ri%?T3TT^$T -z- her grievances, which have of this order. On such reprej 'bl-yiri^'l •W^l^f^a^T^R ^3Tf^T3TT^$T ^een raised in fhis petition, along with copy sentation being nxade, fhe respondent No. 1 s shall decide fhe saiiie wifh^fn a period of three weeks from fhe date of receipt of fhe representati^n, on its own inerits, in accoi-daiice with law. j Sd/. Dhirendra Mishra Judge HN^.