IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12403 of 2009 1. ARUN KUMAR SINGH, S/O LATE HRIDYA NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GAUCHARI, P.S.- GOGRI, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 2. RAVINDRA KUMAR, S/O SRI NARSINGH SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KHATAHA, P.S.-GOGRI, DISTRICT – KHAGARIA. 3. MANOJ KUMAR SINGH, S/O SRI ANANDI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GAUCHARI, P.S.-GOGRI, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 4. VIKASH CHAUDHARY, S/O SRI KAILASAH CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KHATAHA, P.S.- GOGRI, DISTRICT – KHAGARIA. 5. DEVENDRA KUMAR, S/O SRI BRAHMADEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – KHATAHA, P.S.-GOGRI, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 6. BHIM KUMAR, S/O SRI RAMDEO SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KHATAHA, P.S.-GOGRI,DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 7. PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O SRI BUDHAN MANDAN,RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – LAKHANPUR, P.S.-JAMUI, DISTRICT- JAMUI. 8. DHARMENDRA KUMAR, S/O SRI MAHENDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – GAUCHARI, P.S.-MAHESH KHUT, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. D.G. OF POLICE,BIHAR, PATNA. 3. COMMANDANT, B.M.P. 20,DUMRAON,DISTRICT-BUXAR. 4. COMMANDANT, B.M.P. – 21. 5. COMMANDANT, B.M.P.-9,JAMALPUR,DISTRICT-MUNGER 6. COMMANDANT, B.M.P.-8. 7. S.P., MUZAFFARPUR DISTRICT. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- With CWJC No.12312 of 2009 1. SUSHIL KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF SRI RAJ NATH MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 2. RAJESH KUMAR OJHA, SON OF SRI BAIJ NATH OJHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 3. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI SUKHDEO YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UAMIDPUR, P.S.-BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF - 2 - SECRETARY OF GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE D.G. OF POLICE BIHAR PATNA. 3. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION BOARD, BHOJPUR DISTRICT THROUGH THE S.P. BHOJPUR. 4. THE CHAIRMAN CONSTABLE SELECTION LBOARD, PATNA DISTRICT- THROUGH THE S.P., PATNA. 5. THE S.P., BHOJPUR. 6. THE S.P. PATNA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 17.9.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were the applicant for the appointment on the post of Constable in the light of Advertisement No.1/2004. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they appeared in the physical selection test and became successful but were not called for verification of their certificates and testimonials. It is further submitted that the posts advertised are kept vacant, yet petitioners and others have not been considered for such appointment. 3. let the petitioners represent before the Chairman of the Selection Board before whom they appeared and participated in the selection process and the Chairman of the Selection Board shall consider their request for appointment in terms of their merit position in the panel prepared pursuant to - 3 - N.H./ final selection test. If the case of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Constable is not considered then the Chairman of the Selection Board shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law giving reasons as to why petitioners have not been appointed, as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this order. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)