IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1704 OF 2009 Mohamed Sayed Khan ... Petitioner Versus Mumbai Metropolitan Region and Development Authority and others. ... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1934 OF 2009 Mohamed Iqbal Choudhary ... Petitioner Versus Mumbai Metropolitan Region and Development Authority and others. ... Respondents Mr. V.R. Tripathi i/by M/s. V.R. Tripathi & Associates for the petitioner. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 in W.P. No.1704 of 2009 and in W.P. No.1934 of 2009. Mr. B.H. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for the State in W.P. No. 1704 of 2009. Ms. Kiran Bagalia for the MMRDA. Ms. Geeta Jogalekar for the BMC. Mr. A.R. Mishra for the respondent No.4 in W.P. No.1934 of 2009. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. The learned counsel appearing for MHADA submits that they had already demolished the entire structure and provided alternative accommodation to the respondent No.4. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation, however, submits that they would examine the grievance made by the petitioner in relation to persistent unauthorised structure in front of his property even after providing alternative accommodation and after passing appropriate orders would take action in accordance with law. She also states that they will hear respondent No.4 who also wishes to raise the plea that regarding none of the other shops action has been taken. 2. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in this petition. Parties will abide by their statement and act expeditiously. Both the writ petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.