IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15229 of 2009 NAND KISHORE SHARMA SON OF LATE HIRA LAL SHARMA, RESIDING AT MOIHALLA BIHAR SATSANG GALI, AMGOLA, P.O. RAMNA, POLICE STATION- KAZI MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR-842002 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PUBLIC INFORMA;TION OFFICER S.B.I. LOCAL HEAD OFFICE W. GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, CORPORATE CENTRE, STATE BANK OF INDIA BUILDING MADAM KAMA ROAD, MUMBAI- 400021 3. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA HAVING ITS LOCAL OFFICE AT WEST GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA- 800001 4. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA HAVING ITS LOCAL OFFICE AT WEST GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA- 800001 5. REGIONAL MANAGER-II, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, P.O. RAMNA, P.S. MITHANPURA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR 6. REGIONAL MANAGER-IV, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, PATNA 7. REGIONAL MANAGER-V, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, P.S. RAMNA, P.S. MITHANPURA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR 8. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, BETTIAH BRANCH, WEST CHAMPARAN 9. PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, WEST GANDHI MAIDAN, PATNA. 10. RAVINDRA KUMAR,(FATHER’S NAME OF NOT KNOWN), RESIDENT AT NEAR KHADI BHANDAR GOSHALA ROAD, P.S. KANHOLI NAKA, P.O. RAMNA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR- 842002. 11.L.K. SRIVASTAVA,(FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN), RESIDING AT NEAR RAILWAY GUMTE BANKERS COLONY SHERPUR, P.O. RAMNA, P.S. MITHANPURA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR- 842002. 12.VISHWA NATH PRASAD, SON OF RAGHU NATH PRASAD SINGH, RESIDING AT NEAR TANDAN VIVA BHAWAN, GALI NO.6, P.O. RAMNA, P.S. MITHANPURA, MISCOTT, DISTRICT – MUZAFFARPUR- 842002. 13.B.M. PRASAD, SON OF LATE MAHESH PRASAD, RESIDING AT FACTORY INSPECTION OFFICE, P.O. G.P.O. MAJHOLIA, P.S. AND DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR-842001. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 12.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the - 2 - N.H./ petitioner and the State. For the relief prayed for in this application, petitioner had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No.6325 of 1993, which was dismissed under order dated 2.3.1995 contained in Annexure-1 against which he preferred L.P.A. No.267 of 1995, which was also dismissed under orders dated 14.1.1997. The matter thereafter taken to Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.L.P. (Civil) No.7882 of 1997, which was also dismissed under orders dated 10.4.1997. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the State, I am of the view that this writ application is barred by principles of res judicata as the issues raised in this application has been considered and rejected by this Court as also the apex court. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)