CWP No.18587/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 12.10.2010 Dr. Gianvati ...Petitioner VERSUS BPS Mahila Vishwavidyalaya and another …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Vikas Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms. Anamika Negi, Advocate for Mr.BR Gupta, Sr.Advocate has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the controversy involved and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of at motion stage itself. The petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.12.2002. The only grievance of the petitioner is that she has not been paid the leave encashment. The petitioner has placed reliance upon division Bench judgments of this Court passed in CWP No.16992 of 1997 decided on 11.5.1998 and CWP No.7343 of 2007 decided on 11.8.2008. The petitioner has made a representation (Annexure P-2), but no decision has been taken thereon. Learned counsel for the CWP No.18587/2010 2 petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if respondents are directed to decide the representation in the light of the aforesaid judgments. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid judgments within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received by the competent authority. Needless to say in the event the claim of the petitioner is rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 12.10. 2010 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3