IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No.: 206 of 2010. Decided on: 05.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus R.K. Gupta. … Respondent/Contemnor. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent/ Contemnor. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. R.K. Gupta (respondent), Managing Director, H.P. State Forest Corporation is present in Court. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the respondent, on the basis of instructions imparted to her by Mr. R.K. Gupta, undertakes to regularise the services of the petitioner, within a period of three months from today. However, she prays that it may not be construed as precedent for future. 2. Consequently, in view of the fair stand taken by the respondent, the present petition is closed. The petitioner be regularised as undertaken and thereafter allocated to the Education Department. It is made clear that the regularization of the petitioner shall not be construed as a precedent in future. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 05, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.