IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 213 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 213 OF 2006 Ansari Abdul Rashid Abdul Hamid. ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Municipal Corporation for Gr. ] Mumbai and 3 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Gulam R. Khan for the petitioners. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for the respondent No.1. Mr. K.R. Belosey, AGP, for respondents No.3 and 4. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 06TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The prayer sought by the petitioner is to order and direct first and second respondents to permit the petitioner to shift the PCO Booth to TPS/14 adjacent to Cobbler’s Pitch on the opposite footpath admeasuring 2 X 1 = 2 sq. meters. On behalf of respondent No.1, the learned counsel points out to the communication dated 2nd June, 2005 where the petitioner was asked to keep the PCO Booth near Electric Pole TPS/14 adjacent to : 2 : Cobbler’s Pitch on the footpath at Tank Pakhadi Road, Byculla. The respondent No.1 has no difficulty if the petitioner shifts his PCO Booth to that place and erecting it in terms of the licence granted. 3. Considering that, the petitioner is permitted to shift his Booth in terms of the communication dated 2nd June, 2005 and in terms of the licence conditions. 4. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]