.“I a IN THE HIGH CGURT OF JUDIGATURE‘ AT BIWPUR C CHEATTISGARH ) Writ Petition No. 5.6 ‘9 0f 2001. EETITIGNER. Smt. SARASWATI CHOUBEY, Widow of Late Dinesh Frasad Ghoubey, Aged about $5 years, Resicient of Manzali Talab, Champa, District — wJGIaacHmvfyk:(c.G.) V ER3US 1.& Mmwmc; MREGTOR, MADHm PRADESH STATE ROAD Tamwom comoam'lom Im.P.s‘R.T.c.) Habibganj, Bhopal, ( Iri.Pa) Divisional Manager, MoP.S.R.T¢Ca, Divisional Office, BILASPUR.( 04;. ) Depot Manager, m.12.s,a.w.c., AmBIKArUR, DISTMGT _ swaUJA.( G.G. ) WRIT PETHEXON UNDER ARTICLES 226 and. 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.‘ ‘ XLHC-22 @Q WW ma mImmvFtza $ q E’q' $s7fawané$r ‘1' ‘4 ‘k’vif ‘3 13¢ IVEER 17K 1 1.2003 Sm‘i .ix'. Pandsy, barnqci counsd far i116 patitianm‘. Shri Viva}; Shanna. learned counsel for the mspondents. ?I HEarcL The casc' 0f thc pctiticr iS that the petitioncr is; a wicmw 0f thé: €131pley€€ W110 ;") working as a. Ticket Examinm‘ MP. State Raad Tramsport s under the Depot MaEager? Cmpor'tztian. It iS submittai fhat duri g the mama 0f his sarvicey 116 diaibn 23/O3g’1995 mld fm her Submitted that after the {bath of 1161" huSbandj sha A lade. S€Ve¥alr6presentations to ihe reSpcnden’ts far payment f amount of Group Insurance 801161116, due arrears and Otl 61" b§11€fit§ Respondait no.3 ibrwardw ths $aid mpmsa; VationS to rewondent 110.2 aim 1‘6Spondent no.2 haS paSse(i t e order for payment of amaunt 0f Group Hmuyance Schema, ars and Omar baneflts‘ Bu: Ila paymant has 13€en made Q h€r 13V ’ih, reaponcient$ till date. it is furthsr $ubmitted at similarlv Situated auezlmr wiciow has fiied W.P.No.2’753 in the High Court. 9f MP. and thc: (bun: 115$; yja356d i116 order wiih cartain conditions \ which ware issued ta the resp 31(iente.. . :- \\\ \ \ v [@éfi‘a‘i ou w m h / 9 XI~HC—22 ‘ Whcn thé ca$e was 1&51 Sought for by the commal fer 1 in:s:t1‘uctions, but no instruct than till tedav. Having cmngidered the f case alld material on record, i b6 paid t0 thé petitiona‘ by months from ciate of receipt; ui‘der, in accgrdance with law. then th5 1‘63p0nd611‘t/MP‘ Sta may canduct an enquiry and 1 has man negiigence in makm S’ieps which may be required dues at the €a1‘1i65t. This b6 t116reof b6 submitted to we Re With th€ aforesaid obs writ petiiien it; disposed 0f. Parties; are entitled for CE ed 0n 03/ 10,12001, time was :he respondents for obtaining one have been obtaiiled by act‘s and Circumatal’ges; of the t is directed that gavmcnt due the respondents Within two ’produetion of a copy of thie In caSe She haS not been paid te Road Transport Corporation f the lapse is found that. there g pawnents? it may take such to eee that the widow gets her done and compliance report gistry of this Court. ai‘vations and directions, this rtii'ied copra: of this order; Sdl- V J" V FakhfUddi“ L ’13 Judge [HieW