HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA. C.J. & MON' SHRI BAlfc!/^! KnNui u r^i-iAfcin^Aa/Ae i n wnnNi-ft<nf\Art, J. J// Criminal Revision No.276 of 2007 Nandu @ Nand Lal Ahuja, son of Late Nutan Das @ Nutan Mal Ahuja aged about 30 years, resident of 'Baikunth Nagar, Camp-2, infront of i{, Sahu Lakdi Taal, Bhilai, District Durg SNJURED (C.G.) 2. 3. .. i' 'l. Chhattisgarh, District Magistrate, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Munna @ Sunil Shahni, son of Suraj Prakash Shahni, aged about 43 years, resident of Baikunth Nagar, Camp-2 Police Station, Chhaoni, Bhiiai, District - Durg (C.G.) Jaiki @ Lakhan Shahni, son of Suman Shahni, aged about 24 years, resident of Shardapara, Camp - 2, Baikunth Dtiam Chowk, Potice Station Chhaoni, District - Durc (C-G->_ _ ^ ^ . . ._ \; Karan @ Ashi Shahni, son of Ranjit Shahni, aged about 23 years, resident of Shardapara Camp - 2, Police Station — Chhaoni, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.) Nikhil, son of Arun Anand, aged about 22 years, resident of Shardapara, Camp-2, Bhilai, Poiice Station Chhaoni, District - Durg (C.G.) (CRiMSNAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397/401 OF THE CODE OF CPJMJNAL PROCEDURE) 4. 5. Present; Smt. Indira Tripathi, counsei for the peiitioner. Shri. D.K. Gwaire, Govt. Advocate for the State/ 'respondent^No.1. .S.-SS!^^. •.^:- 'SiWS.M ORDER .^ SUbbU- th~ The foliowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.i Smt. Indira Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner/ complainant, in view of the order passed today in Cr.M.P. ).323/2008, whereby leave to appeal against the acquittal of respondents -- accuised persons Munna @ Sunil Shahni, Jaiki 1-,. '4 r " ^ '^ "' - ^ ' Lakhan Shahni, Karan @ Ashi Shahni and Nikhil of the charges under Sections 302 read with Section 149 and 307 reaa' with Section 149 of the I.P.C. was granted and the acquittat appeal was admitted for hearing, seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition filed by the pefitioner/ complainant against the impugned judgmentof acquittal with fhe liberty of assisting the State counsel in the said acquittal appeal. 2. Permission granted 3. With the above liberty," the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The trial Court's records received in this revision petition be tagged with the acquittaLaggeaL.arising out of Cr.lVI.P.No.323/2008. Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge Sd/- ChlefJustice 'ti-^-. . -f-