IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Writ Petition No. 6188 of 2009 Between: M/s. Asrani Tubes Limited, A Company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956, 179, M.G. Road, Secunderabad- 500 003, Rep by its Sec.500003 Rep by its Managing Director Sri Shyamlal Asrani, S/o.Atmaram Asrani, Aged about 60 years, Occ : Business, R/o.SurveyNo.34, AOC Centre, Wellington Road, West Marredpally, Secunderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. Rep byi ts Managing Director, 5-9-58/B, 6th Floor, Parisharama Bhavan, Basheerabagh, Hyderabad. 2) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. Rep by its Zonal Manager and Commissioner, Industrial Area, Patancheru, Medak District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing No. APIIC-IALA/PTC-IV/08 of the 2nd respondent herein dated 28-7-2008 as well as the consequential order vide Lr.No. APIIC-IALA/PTC/IV/08 dated 11/12/2008 passed by the 2nd respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violative of Article 14 and 300A of the constitution of India by setting aside the proceedings of the Respondent herein dated 28-7-2008 as well as the consequential order dated 11-12- 2008 passed by the Respondent and consequently stay all further proceedings pursuant to the orders referred to herein above, including the collection of the property taxes in respect of the petitioner company's plots situated in plots 45 to 48 of phase IV, Industrial Development Area, Patancheru. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: MR.K.V.SIMHADRI The Court made the following: Oral Order: (Per Shri Anil R. Dave, Chief Justice) Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition so as to enable the petitioner to file another petition challenging validity of Section 389-B of Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965. Permission as sought for is granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ April 01, 2009 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J svs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}