IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 RP.No. 1234 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25252/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- PHILOMINA JOSEPH W/O.THOTTAHIL DUO, AGED 60 YEARS RESIDING AT OUSEPHPARAMBIL, KOZHA KARA, KURAVILANGADU VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: --------------- K.J.JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH AGED 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT ARACKAPARAMBIL KOZHA KARA, KURAVILANGADU VILLAGE. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. ------------------------------------------ R.P.NO.1234 OF 2008 IN W.P.C.NO.25252 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated 5th January 2009 O R D E R This petition is filed to review the judgment dated 21/8/2008 whereunder writ petition was dismissed. Review petition filed challenging the order in C.M.A.8/2008 was dismissed. Case of the review petitioner is that if the order passed by trial court in I.A.605/07 and appellate court in C.M.A.8/08 is allowed to be continued, irreparable injury will be caused to the review petitioner. 2. On going through the review petition I find no apparent error or other sufficient reason to order review of the judgment as sought for. Trial court was directed to dispose the suit untrammeled by any observations either in Ext.P8 order of the trial court or Ext.P10 order of the appellate court. In such circumstances I find no reason to review the judgment. The petition is dismissed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj.