35- c^\^y d) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. ^^ /2009 PETITIONER: A" )4^ «^> ss^" <^>'',,»"'' ...- ^•''..i/'' ..•••'" ^- RESPONDENTS: 11 Ashok Panchbhai S/o Late Shri Kashi Ram Panchbhai, Aged about 48 years, R/o 32, Arihant Tower, Pagariya Coinplex, New Bus Stand Raipur, Tahsil SE District Raipiu- (C.G.) VERSUS 'l^a. S-te^t cf^ CUyr+t''-^^ (The Deputy Secretj Through Chief Secretary D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 'sl" <r1 2) Secretary Public Health and Family Welfare Deparbnent, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipi-u- (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _ FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) OR QRDER(s) QR DIRECTIONSfS) HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUi WRIT PET1TION (S^ N0.6838 OF 2009 ?1 PETiTiON! RESPONDi nok Panchbhai Versus The Sf Another Cv^^n ^f f'"lL*in<n>.^;^ni>a»'i«k !li3 • Ols3i.S? sJl ^•HHiriii.i^ysSni t'Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constltution of India) Smgie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satssh K. Agn'hotri, J. 'resent:- Shri Y.C. Sharma, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. Generai with Shri N.N. Roy, Panei Lawver for the Stats. (Passed on this 23'" day of November, 2009) 'vVith ihe consent of iearned counse! sppearing for the partiss, the petition is heard finaily. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submiis that by oraer dated 27-8-2008 (Annexure - P/1) the petitioner was removed from the ser/ice 'A'hlle working as Deputy Direcior (Transporf), Directorate Health Se'rvices. Againstthe sald order, the p&titionsr preferred a statutory appeal before His Exceliency the Governor of State of Chhattisgarh on 1-12-2008, but the saroe has not been decided til! date. Learnsd counsel prays that the respondent-authoritiss may be directed to cohsider and dacide •the psnding appeai ofthe petitioner. tt is v/eSi settles principie of iaw that the appeai may be disposed of as expeditiously as possibie preferabiy withln a period:of six months from the dats of fi'.ins of apDeat.. At this juncture, Shri Thakur, Searned i3y. Adv. Genera! appearins with Shri N.N. Roy, iearneci Pansl Lawyer for the State, submits thatthe pending appeal ofthe pstitjc.ner shaii be consldered and decidsd, in accordsnce witn Isw a"ad on its own merits, 'n'ifhin a geriod of six weeks from the date of recsiot of a coov of this Qfcar, . In viev/ of foregoing, according to Searned counsei appearing for ths petitioner, nothing suroives in this petition for adjudication. •'Accordingly, thewFit petition is disposed of. ____ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge TIMai