IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25413 of 2010 RANJAY KUMAR @ TULLU, SON OF CHANDRA KISHORE SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.07.2010 Heard both sides. On 17.5.2010, the petitioner was granted bail but on condition that the Informant would be noticed by the court concerned to satisfy himself that the matter has been compromised between the parties. Today, a fresh petition has been filed stating therein that the Informant despite notice, has not appeared in the court concerned. However, I am not satisfied with this submission. Therefore, the order dated 17.5.2010 is modified to the extent that the petitioner be granted provisional bail initially for a period of three months subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on 2 date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In the meanwhile the court concerned shall notice the Informant and confirm the fact of compromise. Once, he satisfied, the provisional bail shall be confirmed and if not, at the end of three months, the petitioner shall be taken into custody. Let this order be communicated to the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in Sessions Trial No. 192 of 2010 arising out of Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 149 of 2005, through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)