1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 159 OF 2010 (Hussain Shripat Fulzele vs. Vinay Kishor Pashine & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 14, 2010. Heard Shri Badhe, learned counsel for the petitioner. The trial Court rejected prayer for amendment of written statement vide order dated 11.09.2009 noticing that recording of evidence was over and suit was at the stage of final arguments. Then, the petitioner filed an application for review and that application has also been rejected on 10.12.2009. The Suit, therefore, could not proceed further after the order dated 11.09.2009. I do not find any perversity in the order dated 11.09.2009. There is no jurisdictional error. Hence, writ petition is not entertained. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge said order, if occasion therefor arises, after the Civil Suit is finally decided. JUDGE *GS.