1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1143 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri D.M. Gupte for the Appellant. Shri Vishal Kanade i/by Mrs.J.V. Kanade for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms Namrata Waghole for Respondent No.4. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Appellant. By this Appeal from Order, the Appellant who is original Plaintiff is challenging the order dated 17th March, 2009 by which the application for temporary injunction made by the Appellant has been rejected. From 17th March, 2009, there was no ad-interim relief operating in favour of the Appellant. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant pointed out that now the issues have been settled. Though no case is made out to interfere with the 2 discretionary order passed by the Trial Court at this stage, it must be observed that the observations made in the impugned order are only tentative and prima facie observations and the Trial Court is bound to decide the suit without being influenced by the observations on its own merits after considering the evidence adduced by the parties. 3. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. The Appeal is dismissed accordingly. (A.S.OKA, J)