1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.900 OF 1993 ... Dr.Tilok Chandra Gupta ...Petitioner v/s. Union of India & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.D.B.Patil for the Petitioner. Mr.Y.R.Mishra for Respondent No. 1. Mr.P.M.Patel for Respondents Nos. 2 & 3. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 16th July, 2009 P.C.: 1. It is common ground that the facts and law involved in this petition are similar 2 to the facts and law involved in Writ Petition No.856 of 1993. We have already held in the order passed in that Writ Petition that exception to the order of terminating the services of the Petitioner cannot be taken. We have already held that the person similarly situated like the Petitioner herein is not entitled to pension and gratuity. Hence, in this petition, the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent stated that any amount of provident fund that may be outstanding and any other amount to which the Petitioner may be entitled to ,on the basis of the services rendered by him, shall be calculated and paid to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. 2. In our opinion, in view of the statement made by the advocate appearing for the Respondent, no direction is necessary in 3 this petition. Petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) 4