THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.24089 of 2011 Dated:30.08.2011 Between: D.Rajkumar. … Petitio And The Deputy Director General, Geological Survey of India, Southern Region, GSI Complex, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad, And another. ... Responde THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.24089 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The petitioner assails the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal da 22.08.2011 in O.A.No.714 of 2011. By the said order, learned Tribunal refused extend the order of interim suspension for ten days granted on 21.07.2011, in eff staying the transfer of the petitioner from Hyderabad to Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner till July was working as Assistant in AMSE wing and Geolog Survey of India (GSI). His case was considered by the Departmental Promo Committee favourably. By Office Memo dated 05.07.2011 the Deputy Director Gene Bangalore, promoted the petitioner as Superintendent. On 06.07.2011 the petitio was transferred to GSI, Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, which he challenged in Original Application before the Tribunal. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal was in error in not extend the interim order. He submits that the petitioner was chosen for transfer Thiruvananthapuram as he went on asking for information under the Right Information Act and this caused unpleasantness to the superiors. Therefore, transfer order itself is unsustainable. The Office Note which the petitioner statedly obtained under the Righ Information Act has been annexed to the writ petition. A perusal of the same wo clearly show that there are abundant administrative reasons for transferring petitioner. Further, he has been promoted on 05.07.2011, and as he could not accommodated in Hyderabad at present, he was transferred by the authority. Tho the Counsel also submits that the transferring authority has no jurisdiction, no relev rules are placed before us. Therefore, we do not find any error in the order of Tribunal. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO ________________ (K.G.SHANKAR 30.08.2011 vs