IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10476 of 2009 SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 1.9.2009 In the instant writ petition the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to pay the admitted amount of the petitioner for the work of renovation of Dhamati river. The petitioner states that pursuant to an agreement bearing no.3/2006-07 dated 25.1.2007 he was allotted renovation work at Dhamti river from distance point from 197.40 to 214.80. The petitioner has completed the allotted work but the first bill was prepared for the work only from distance point 206.60 to 214.80 on 18.4.2007. Thereafter a second bill was prepared for the work from distance point 197.40 to 206.60 but payment of the works from distance point 198.60 to 206.60 was only made to the petitioner and payment for the works from distance point 197.40 to 198.60 was withheld. The petitioner further states that in this regard he has filed several representations but payment has not been made as yet. After hearing counsel for the parties, this court observes that if the petitioner files a representation raising all his grievances before the Executive Engineer, Investigation and Planning Division, Gandak Area Development Agency, Masharakh, Chapra, respondent no.3, he will dispose of the same 2 KHAN by a speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of the representation and would pay the admitted dues to him. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)