IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2200 of 2010 1. MITHU SINGH 2. Pankaj @ Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Gongu Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 28.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners along with their father alleged for commitment of loot of household articles along with grain damaging several articles and making attempt to commit murder of the complainant after pressing her neck. While submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners and their family members fired also but in the air which itself belies the allegation of their intention to kill the complainant, otherwise dispute was prevailing in between the family members of two brothers. One of them namely, Manoj Kumar was killed and in the case for his murder, all male members of the complainant are behind the Bar. According to the learned counsel only to make the pressure and to save their skin, this false case is lodged and the petitioners are apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 134 of 2009 and G.R. No. 776 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)