IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2007 / 18TH ASHADHA 1929 Cont.Case(C).No.937 of 2007(S) ---------------------------------------------------------------- (ARISING FROM THE ORDER IN W.A.476/2007 DATED 23/02/2007) .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:- ---------------------------------------- V.J. PHILOMINA, AGED 57 YEARS, W/O. N.V. CHACKO, R/AT NANGALIL HOUSE, NEAR T.H.S., CHITTUR P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. (HEAD NURSE, GOVT. HOSPITAL, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD). BY ADV. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN RESPONDENT: PETITIONER:- ------------------------------------------ JOSE CYRIAC, AGE (NOT KNOWN), FATHER'S NAME (NOT KNOWN), PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUMAR. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.T.Sankaran,J. --------------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.937 of 2007-S --------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 9th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. Alleging that the respondent herein has disobeyed the interim orders and directions issued by this Court in W.A.No.476 of 2007 dated 23rd February, 2007, the complainant-petitioner is before us in this contempt petition. (2) On instructions, the learned Government Advocate would state that the complainant is expected to furnish certain details for calculating the pensionary benefits payable to her. (3) The learned counsel appearing for the complainant would submit that the complainant has already furnished the necessary information to the respondent. He further submits that in case the respondent wants any further information, the complainant would furnish the same to the respondent. (4) In view of the above, the following order is passed for the present: (i) The complainant-petitioner shall furnish all the details to the respondent for disbursal of the admissible pensionary benefits in a week's time from today. (ii) After receipt of the information from the complainant, the respondent is directed to disburse the admissible pensionary benefits to the complainant, we make it clear, without raising hypotechnical doubts. (iii) That shall be done by the respondent within four weeks from the date of submission of the details as directed by the respondent. Cont.Case (C).No.937 of 2007-S - 2 - (iv) If for any reason the respondent does not comply with the orders and directions issued by us today, the complainant is at liberty to approach this Court once again. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice K.T.Sankaran Judge vku/-