IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2011 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1932 LA.App..No. 61 of 2008() ------------------------ (LAR NO.180/02 IN THE PRL. SUB COURT ALAPPUZHA) APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.T.HANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT IN THE LAR --------------------------------------------- 1. SARASWATHY PILLAI, SANTHAKUMARI AMMA, SANTHALAYAM, KAPPILMEKKUMURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CONSTRUCTION (RAILWAYS), KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.N.B.SUNIL NATH,SC, RAILWAYS FOR R2 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No. 61 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 7th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though Smt.Latha T.Thankappan, learned senior Government Pleader addressed strenuous arguments on the basis of the various grounds raised, having gone through the impugned judgment, we do not find any warrant for interference. We are convinced that the reliance placed by the learned Subordinate Judge on Ext.A1 was justified. Ext.A1 has admittedly attained finality. The time gap between Ext.A1 and the date of section 4(1) notification in this case was just one month. There is no justification for interfering with the impugned judgment. The appeal will stand dismissed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk