IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11792 of 2008 Date of decision: February 10, 2009 Om Parkash Yadav ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the pension of the petitioner has been refixed as claimed by him after giving the benefit of increments and to that extent this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In case benefits of revised pension have not been released to the petitioner, the same be released within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. February 10, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE