IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 35492 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- NARAYANA NAIK P., LECTURER IN ELECTRONICS, GOVT. POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KASARGOD – 671316. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. K.M. SUHARA, HEAD OF SECTION (ELECTRONICS), GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, NEDUMANGAD. 4. BHAGYASREE DEVI, HEAD OF SECTIN (ELECTRONICS), GOVERNMNET POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, NEDUMANGAD. 5. S. ANJANA, HEAD OF SECTION (ELECTRONICS), IPTI AND GPT, SHORNUR. 6. J. JALANEY, HEAD OF SECTION (ELECTRONICS) GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, NEYYATTINKARA. BY GOVERNMNET PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. --------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.35492 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2007 JUDGMENT Against non-consideration of his claim for promotion, the petitioner filed Ext.P5 representation before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the nature of the order I propose to pass I do not think it necessary to issue notice to respondents 3 to 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 to 6. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd