THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.24625 of 2000 ORDER: The petitioner is working as Attender in the Telugu Bala Mahila Pragathi Pranganam, the 3rd respondent herein. It is stated that when proposals for regularization of his services were submitted, the Government rejected the same, on 25.03.2000. Apprehending removal from service, the petitioner has approached this Court. The respondent filed a counter-affidavit, admitting that the petitioner joined the service in 1990. It is, however, stated that he is not entitled for regularization as per G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. While admitting the writ petition on 13.12.2000, this Court passed interim order directing the respondents to continue the petitioner’s services. In compliance with the same, the respondents are continuing him. It is now known as to whether there is any change in law as to the regularization of the services. The petitioner can be replaced, only when a regular appointment is made for the post against which he is working. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that the respondents shall continue the petitioner’s service till the post against which he is working is filled up on regular basis and the case of the petitioner shall also be considered subject to eligibility, as and when regular appointment takes place. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.02.12.2010. GJ