IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 12961 of 2001 BETWEEN: M/s. Swapna Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Director, S. Narsimha Reddy, a partnership firm, having its Office at 3-3-50, I floor, Amrutha Arcade, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissionerate of Tenders, at B.R.K.R. Bhavan, through its Commissioner/Chair Person, VI Floor, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, A.M.R.P. Circle I, G.V. Gudem, Nalgonda District. 3 The Chief Engineer, Srisailam Project at M.J.Market Road, Hyderabad. 4 Mahendra Kumar N. Shah, through its Partner, Tejas M. Shah, 880/2, GPO Road, Opp: Empire Bakery, Mirzapur, Ahmedabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not passing final orders against of the 2nd Respondent in not passing final orders against the fourth respondent pursuant to the show cause notice dt:31.3.2001 issued in Lr.No.SE/AMRP.CI/GVG/DEE-II/TS7/AKBR/HR/Gates/284 M on the file of the 2nd Respondent as illegal and arbitrary by further directing the Respondents to take decision for award of the work pursuant to Tender Notice dt:8.5.2001 in Tender Notice No.2 SE/2001-2002 after finalising the proceedings pursuant to show cause notice dt:31.3.2001 issued against the fourth respondent; Award costs and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. MR. G. VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. K. Devender, learned counsel representing Mr. K. Raghuveer Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 12, 2008 DSK