IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8 of 2008 BAHADUR BHAGAT & ANR Versus THE STATE OG BIHAR ----------- 03/ 16.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused for offences punishable under section 365/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prosecution case is that co-accused Ram Sawaria Devi had taken the father of the informan0t, whereafter they did not return. He further submits that the petitioners and another co-accused Tribhuwan Bhagat have been implicated subsequently only on the basis of suspicion that they might have confined the father of the informant due to previous enmity. He also submits that there is no material at all to support the baseless suspicion. He also avers that co-accused Tribhuwan Bhagat, against whom there are exactly similar allegation, has already been enlarged on bail on the order of this Court dated 31.05.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16252 of 2007. He also states that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, but he is in custody since the date of his surrender i.e. 29.06. 2007. In the facts and circumstances, this petition for bail is allowed. Accordingly, let both the petitioners, namely, Bahadur Bhagat and Panchhi Sahani be admitted to bail on executing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 ( ten thousand ) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 219 of 2006. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )