IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 21ST MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3765 of 2011(U) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- AJOYZ INFO SOLUTION INDIA PVT. LTD., XIX/458/26, 2ND FLOOR GLOBAL PLAZA, BEHIND RAILWAY STATION POOTHOLE P.O.,THRISSUR DISTRICT, REP. BY JOY ARAKKAL, MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPRATMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 678 001. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-678001 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR - 680 001. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR,THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 001. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR,THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 001. 6. JEGGY MATHEW, S/O.M.V.MATHEW,BRIGHTON EQUIPS,4/96, NEAR L.I.C.OFFICE,TALAP, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 002. R1 TO R5 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS R6 BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs WP(C).No. 3765/2011(U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION. P2: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 06/10/2010. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25/01/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & S.S.Satheesachandran, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.3765 of 2011-U = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of February, 2011. Judgment Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The petitioner says that the police unnecessarily harass its employees on account of certain allegations being levelled by the sixth respondent. The learned counsel for the sixth respondent states that the sixth respondent has been cheated and on the complaint of the sixth respondent, a crime has been registered and the same is under investigation. We record this submission. We make the interim order dated 4.2.2011 absolute and order that the police will not interfere in any civil dispute between the petitioner and the sixth respondent. However, if a crime is registered, that has to be investigated and carried to its logical end. The WPC3765/11 -: 2 :- petitioner would, therefore, co-operate with the investigation. Let that procedure go on in accordance with law. The police will ensure that no complaint of harassment comes from the petitioner. If the petitioner has any further complaint of harassment, the said company or its Managing Director or other representative may make appropriate complaint in accordance with law before the Police Complaint Authority. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. S.S.Satheesachandran, Judge. Sha/1402