ar-^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^C.G.1 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^'^3^-f pp 2006 (S.B.) PETITIONER ^ ^<^. ^•\./''^~'-'' ,.-• b/^;'"" ...•••"" ^:^"" . .^v" It®" r^ R£SPONDENTS /l. ^3. ^Sachindra Kumar Sahu, aged about 19 years Son of Late Shri Cholram Sahu, Resident of Village Ramhepur, Ward No.14, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.). The Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, FOR ISSUANCE OF <s APPROPRIATE, 1950, IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. ETC. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT WRITS^, ORDER fORDERS). AND DIRECTION (DIRECTIONS), TQ_DQ_JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ^ HI6H COUKT OF JU&ICAWRE CHHATnS6ARHL_BILASPW Single Bench: Hon'bt®Shri Satish K. ^gnihotri. J. W. P.fSl No. 5734 of 2006 Petitioner : Sadiindra Kumar Snhu Versus Respondents : State of ChhafHsgarh & Others Shri Mola/ Kjmar Bhaduri, counsel for -the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Depu-ty ©ovemment Advocats for the respondents/State. OR D E R (21d November. 2006} 1. The father of the petitioner namely 3iri Cholaram Sahu while working as Clerk (Assislant ©rade-rCE) in Soyemment Higher Secondary School, Sodkhamhi, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur dted on 11.7.1996 in hamess. 2. At -the time of tiie death of decsased Chohram 5ahu, the petitioner wos minor. TTie petitioner attained the 098 of majoritj? on 14.7.2005, thereby he become eligible for makmg application and for consideration of his case on the basis of compassionate appointment. 3, In the msantim®,the Sovernment of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, directed alt the depart-ments to consider cases of al! the eligible dependent-legat hair of the deceased employee, who died in harness between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for compassiona-t-e ground. •?•> -&- Bobhi 2 ^4— 4. Since, the petitioner ottained majority on 14.7.2005, the cnse of the petitioner dioutd be considered afresh as per its own circular dated 2.2.2006 and also in view of the order passec! by Ihis Court in Writ Petition No. 3879/2004 ond other connected matters on its own merit, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks frow the date of the repre.sentation, if so mode. 5. For the reasons stated-aboy®.the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge y.