IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 529 of 2008(K) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SAROJINI, D/O.LATE NARAYANI, "AISWARAYA", NEDUNGOLAM .P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. SURESH BABU, DEVAMATHA HOUSE, NEDUNGOLAM P.O., PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. LEELA, D/O.LEKSHMI, DEVAMATHA HOUSE, NEDUNGOLAM P.O., PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 529 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Munsiff, Paravoor in I.A.778/07 in O.S.310/01. By the said order the Court below has allowed an application for impleadment. The main grievance is that though a very elaborate and serious objection is filed nothing has been considered by the Court below. I have also perused the order and it is a non-speaking order. When serious objections are raised and questions of law are raised regarding the maintainability of such objections it is always incumbent upon the Court to consider the same before passing orders. As the order is passed without proper application of mind it requires interference. Therefore, the order under challenge is set aside and the Munsiff, Paravoor is directed to consider I.A.778/07 afresh after hearing both sides. Since I am W.P.C 529 OF 2008 -:2:- disposing of the case at the admission stage itself the Court on restoration give notice to the other side and hear both sides and dispose of the matter in the light of the objections and the question of law raised. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-