IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 13658 of 2008 Between: Kommareddy Sravan Kumar, S/o. K.V.N. Appa Rao, R/o. Pothuluru, Near Shivalayam, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretarait, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3 The Superintendent Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Zilla Parishad, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4 The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Zilla Parishad, Eluru, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in prosing to lay blacktop road by widening, on the existing pathway, which is situated in the petitioner's lands belong to them, in Sy.Nos.424, 423, 427, 428 & 430 situated in Pothuluru Village, Denduluru Mandal, West Godavari District, without giving any notice or following due process of law, and also laying road under the guise of benefit to the Harijanwada which is non existent in Kethavaram Village and for the benefit of people who are politically sound having large extents of fish ponds on the further eastern side of the said Kethavaram Village, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to lay any blacktop and road mentioned lands under the guise of laying road for the benefit of Harijanawada in Kethavaram Village, which is non existence by directing the respondents to produce the concerned record in sanctioning the blacktop road which is contrary to the principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: After arguing the matter to some extent, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition in view of the fact that a civil suit has already been filed with regard to the dispute raised in this writ petition. Accordingly, the permission is granted, and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ____________ (G. Rohini, J.) 27th June, 2008 Js. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretarait, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3 The Superintendent Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Zilla Parishad, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4 The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Zilla Parishad, Eluru, West Godavari District. 5 2 CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad.(OUT) 5 2 CD copies.