IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2009 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 29681 of 2006(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------- KRISHNAKUMAR, JANAKEYAVEDI, SECRETARY, PURANATTUKARA, ATTOOR HOUSE, P.O.PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR-680 551. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY FOR HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, NEW DELHI. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN DEEMED UNIVERSITY, 56-57, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI-110 058. 3. RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, NEW DELHI-110 058. 4. RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN PURNATTUKARA CAMPUS, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL, P.O.PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR-680 551. 5. DR.N.R. KANNAN, PRINCIPAL, RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN PURNATTUKARA CAMPUS, P.O.PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR-680 551. ADDL.R6. P.R. JOSHY CARETAKER (ON PROBATION) RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN PURANATTUKARA CAMPUS P.O. PURANATTUKARA THRISSUR -680551 (ADDITIONAL R6 IS IMLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 31.10.2007 IN I.A.13276/2007) ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE, ASSISTANT SG FOR R1 SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR FOR R2, 3 & 4 SRI.M.V.RAMACHANDRAN THAMPI FOR R2, 3 & 4 SMT.ANITHA RAMKUMAR FOR R5 SRI.P.S.BIJU, ADDL.CGSC FOR R.1TO4 SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN FOR R6 SRI.N.M.MADHU FOR R4 SMT.C.DEVIKA RANI KAIMAL FOR R4 SRI.RAJIT FOR ADDL.R7 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 29681 of 2006(H) Appendix Ext.P1: True copy of the Office Memorandum dated 30.6.1999. Ext.P2: True copy of the paper notification dated 5.11.2003. Ext.P3: True copy of the mass representation dated 26.1.2005 Ext.P4: True copy of the representation dated 30.5.2006. Ext.P5: True copy of the representation dated 2.12.2005 Ext.P6: true copy of the communication dated 26.4.2006 received by the petitioner. Ext.P7: True copy of the reply notice dated 3.6.2006. Ext.P8: true copy of the report dated 8.11.1999 of Dr.K.P.A. Menon Ext.P9: true copy of the representation dated 30.3.2000 by late K.P.C. Narayanan Bhattathiripad. Ext.p10(a) to Ext.P10(d): true copies of the serialized feature appeared in Janmabhoomi daily during August-September 2002. Ext.P11 series : True copies of the news paper reports appeared during September – October 2002 Ext.P12: True copy of the proceedings dated 9.7.2004 issued on behalf of 2nd respondent. Ext.P13 Series: True copies of the excerpts of various newspaper reports and photographs appeared on 6.9.2007. Ext.R4(1): A true copy of the letter dated 9.7.2004 of Deputy Director Administration Ext.R4(2):A true copy of the selection committees proceedings dated 8.1.2005 Ext.R4(3): A true copy of the list of applicants and interview conducted on 8.1.2005. Ext.R7(a): True copy of the letter issued on behalf of the 1st respondent dt. 11.01.2008 Ext.R7(b): true copy of the O.M dated 22.9.2008 issued by the 1st respondent. Ext.R7(c): True copy of the true copy of the communication issued by the Information Officer attached to the 4th respondent under the Right to Information Act dt.30.1.2008. Ext.R7(d): True copy of the true copy of the letter dated 19.11.2004 written by the 2nd respondent to the 4th respondent. Ext.R7(e): True copy of some of the relevant pages of the Log Book Ext.R7(f): True copy of the Letter written by the 4th respondent under the Right to Information Act dt.9.1.2008. Ext.R7(g): True copy of true copy of some of the Bills. //True copy// HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.29681 of 2006 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT The main prayer in this writ petition is for a writ of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent, to order a complete investigation against the 5th respondent and to take follow up corrective steps including departmental and criminal actions against 5th respondent in the light of such investigation. When the matter was taken up for final hearing, the order dated 2.2.2009 issued by the 4th respondent was brought to the notice of this Court. In the said order it is stated that the 4th respondent has taken a decision to enquire into the various allegations against the 5th respondent and for the said purpose a Committee was constituted consisting of 4 members . The prayer of the petitioner for an investigation is more or less satisfied by the said order passed by the 4th respondent. Therefore no further orders are necessary in this writ petition This writ petition is closed. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) es. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C).No.29681 of 2006 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 25th March, 2009