KBP wp7511-08.sxw : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7511 OF 2008 Ashok Baburao Vairagar ..Petitioner V/s. Chandrakant Devidas Joshi and ors. .. Respondents ..... Mr.S.A.Vaidya, for petitioner. M/s.Anjali Uthale i/b.Mr.S.S.Kulkarni, for respondent no.1. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22 nd JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard learned Advocates for petitioner and respondent. An application was made by the petitioner ­ plaintiff for issuing witness summons. The said application has been rejected by impugned order. Learned trial Judge is right when he has rejected the application mainly on the ground that the same is absolutely vague. Rejection of the application was not on merit. If the petitioner wants production of any record he will have to set out in the application the description of documents which he wants and only if a case is made out for allowing the production of documents or examination of particular witness, the trial court can consider the prayer for issuing witness summons. 2] Hence, no case for interference is made out. However, it will be open for the petitioner to make an application for production of documents. The KBP wp7511-08.sxw : 2 : said application shall be examined by the trial court and only if a case is made out for issue of summons, necessary orders will be passed by the trial Court. 3] Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. ( A.S.OKA, J. )