( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2589 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2589 OF 2010 Babula s/o Navalmal Pipada APPLICANT VERSUS Dropadabai w/o Manohar Gore and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. R.B. Temak, advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Patil, advocate for the applicant. Mr. G.V. Korhalkar, advocate for respondents No. 1 to 11. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 25th February, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The respondent No. 4 died during pendency of the petition. The application is moved for substitution of his legal representatives. Considering the submissions of the counsel and the statement made in the application as well as the fact that the death of respondent No. 4 was not intimated to the Court as ( 2 ) required under Order-XXII Rule-10A of the Civil Procedure Code, the delay is condoned and the abatement, if any, is set aside. The legal representatives of the deceased respondent No. 4 be substituted in his place. The civil application is accordingly allowed. 3. Mr. Korhalkar waives notice for the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 4. 4. The petition be fixed for final hearing on 4th March, 2010. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca2589-2010