IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3081 of 2007 1. Sanjeev Kumar, son of Sri Jaganath Upadhyaya, resident of Village Rakasa, P.S. Kanti, Dist. Muzaffarpur. 2. Pawan Kumar, son of Shri Ram Prit Yadav, resident of Village Ahilla, P.O. Sinuaara, P.S. Bahadurpur, Dist. Darbhanga. 3. Ambika Gupta, son of Sri Gosain Lal Sah, wife of Sri Deo Narayan Gupta, resident of Village Dhatta, P.O. Lokaha, P.S. Lokaha, Dist. Madhubani. 4. Subhash Chandra Thakur, son of Sri Kailash Thakur, Resident of Village Dumaria Khurd, P.S. Parbatta, Dist. Khagaia. --------- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Patna, Bihar. 3. The Director, State council of Education Research and Training, Patna, Ashok Raj Path, Mahendru, Patna. 4. The District Primary Education, Patna, Bihar. 5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur. 6. The District Superintendent of Educatin, Samastipur. 7. The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Samastipur. 8. The Block Educational Extension Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, Block Samastipur. 9. The Block Education Extension Officer, Samastipur, Samastipur. 10. The Block Development Officer, Samastipur, Samastipur. 11. The Block Development Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar Block- Samastipur. -----------Respondents ----------- 3 09.08.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. Counsel for the State is present. The prayer of the petitioners in this writ application for quashing of the order dated 21.1.2007 seeking removal of any such teacher appointed as Panchayat Teacher or Nagar Shikshak in any Primary Middle School on the basis of certificate issued 2 from Gandhi Hindi Vidyapith Prayag, Allahabad, is wholly misconceived, inasmuch as, at no point of time the Government of Bihar had recognized such certificate to be a valid degree in teachers training course. Moreover the respondents have also explained in the counter affidavit the fact regarding the recognized institutes in the State of Bihar and have also enclosed the list sent by the State Council for Research Education and Training, Lucknow that the institute, in question, from which the petitioners are said to have passed their training examination, is not recognized even by the State of Uttar Pradesh and NCTE. There is no rejoinder to the counter affidavit denying the aforesaid facts and thus there is no escape from inevitable conclusion that the petitioners did not possess the prescribed qualification for appointment on the post of teachers. In that view of the matter there would be hardly any scope for this Court to hold either the appointment of the petitioners on the part of Panchayat/Nagar Shikshak to be valid and/or their removal, 3 due to lack of proper educational/training qualification, to be bad. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)