IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 5354 of 2010. Decided on: 09.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner : Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) That the impugned orders dated 11.6.2007 (Annexure P-1) as well as order dated 5.8.2010 (Annexure P-9) may kindly be quashed after issuing the writ of certiorari. ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to re-instate back the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits by declaring the order dated 11.6.2007 (Annexure P-1) as null and void.” 2. In the nature of order we propose to pass in this case, we don’t think it necessary to take up the various contentions raised by the petitioner on merits. The petitioner has efficacious remedy of filing the revision before 1st respondent under Rule 29 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. It will also be open to the petitioner to take up the contention that he has not been given justice - 2 - on jurisdiction and also on account of discriminatory treatment since the co-delinquent, Sadhu Ram has been left scot free. We make it clear that the 1st respondent will consider all these grievances and take a final decision in the matter on merits, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the revision petition. In case the petitioner makes a request for liberty of personal hearing, the same shall also be granted. 3. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 09, 2010. (sck/awasthi).