IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12500 of 2008 Between: 1 Bobba Jaya Rami Reddy, S/o. Bali Reddy, R/o. Cheekateegalapalem Village, Vinukonda Mandal, Guntur District. 2 Kamatam Venkateswara Reddy, S/o. Venkat Reddy, R/o. Cheekateegalapalem Village, Vinukonda Mandal, Guntur District. 3 Annem Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o. Koti Reddy, R/o. Cheekateegalapalem Village, Vinukonda Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Joint Collector and Additional District Magistrate, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The District Supply Officer, Civil Supplies, Guntur, Guntur District. 3 The Tahsildar, Vinukonda Mandal, Guntur District. 4 Kasula Panakalu, S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. cheekateegalapalem Village, Vinukonda Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ or orderor direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in seizing the petitioners Red Gram Stocks of 116 bags and in trying to sell away the said stocks in a open auctin in pursuance of the interim order dated 19- 05-2008 in E.C. Act case No. 53/2008-S7 of the 1st respondent without any notice to the petitioners as bad, arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to release the Red Gram Stocks which was seized by the respondents in favour of the petitioners and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. __________ G.ROHINI, J 25th September, 2008 SKM