C.R. No.5275 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5275 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.8.2010 Mohan Lal ……Petitioner VERSUS Bhim Sain and another ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.V. Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.1. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 17.8.2009 passed by Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Mahendergarh, whereby learned trial Court has invoked the provision of Order 26 Rule 9 C.P.C. and appointed Office Kanungo as Local Commissioner C.R. No.5275 of 2009 (O&M) -2- with the direction to demarcate the disputed property mentioned in the plaint and para No.2 of the application and also directed the Commissioner to report about the fact, as to whether property in dis- pute is Rasta-e-Saream or it is exclusive property of plaintiff or as to whether the same has been used by defendant Nos.1 or 2. 2. Learned Counsel appearing before me for both the par- ties fairly stated that present petition be decided with consent in the following terms:- Report of the Commissioner shall be read only for the purpose of demarcation and survey and shall not be read for any other purpose. 3. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, pres- ent petition stands disposed of in the above said terms. ( ALOK SINGH ) 25th August, 2010 JUDGE ashish