1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3733/2008 (Balu Tularam Meshram VERSUS The State of Mah. & others) WITH Writ Petition No. 3734/2008 (Saw. Rekha Prabhakar Gujalwar VERSUS The State of Mah. & others) WITH Writ Petition No. 3735/2008 (Tukaram Dashrath Chouke VERSUS The State of Mah. & others) WITH Writ Petition No. 3736/2008 (Sitaram Baburao Kotpalliwar VERSUS The State of Mah. & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. Anand Parchure, counsel for the petitioner.(In all the petitions) Mr. N.W. Sambre, Government Pleader for the R-1 to 4 in W.P. No.3733/2008. Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, Assistant Government Pleader for R-1 to 4 in W.P. No.3734/2008. Mr. A.D. Sonak, Assistant Government Pleader for the R-1 to 4 in W.P. Nos. 3735/2008 and 3736/2008. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2008. The petitioners in all these petitions raised a common grievance namely, their apprehension that on account of proclamation issued by respondent no.4 on 30.07.2008, their license may be cancelled or their quota of kerosene may be adversely affected and hence, these petitions are being disposed of by this common order. 2 In all the petitions, affidavit-in-reply have been filed by the District Supply Officer, Gadchiroli and it has been specifically stated that the proclamation dated 30.07.2008 is issued for inviting applications to grant kerosene license for the villages for which there is no license holder as of now and it has been further clarified that the petitioners' existing license in respect of the concerned village is not likely to be adversely affected and even their quota of kerosene for the concerned village will not be disturbed by the said proclamation. It is, therefore, obvious that the petitions have served their purpose and we accept the undertaking so produced on behalf of the respondents and consequently, the petitions stand disposed off. JUDGE JUDGE APTE