i s ^' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Fl'--i> "n . ,;!' ., .c^.'A.^J..^.^.....-^ . S.^4^toJ^ • S£^A*-&SU •<*«*» ir ^.^^ K.. toB.S,(J) ^^^^ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Criminal Appeal No. •z s^ /2004 1. Kanhaiya Ram S/o Maniram Satnami, aged about 18'years Manishankar @ Kariya S/o Lallu Satnami, aged about 21 years Dilchand S/o Dukalu Satnami, aged about 20 years Subhash S/o Goverdhan Kanwar, aged about 18 years Santu Ram S/o Bhaghi Ram Satnami, aged about 18 years Prem Lal alias Tetka S/o Dukalu Satnami, aged about 18 years All are resident ofBenderkona, P.S. BalcoNagar, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENT 1\ \M 1.- .eM ^-' . ^..s,^ State ofChhattisgarh Through Police Statioa Balco Nagar, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) «»•' CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 374(2) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE XI-HC-22 311^1 ^iT f?iR;sn^T ai*(it>gf6(T Gowri 3^ -<il<iw<A, yTflu'ls, isjrtltiy tlTOdrWTRi<^rmio^/s, c.^c.4.^^b W[ 1 200 ^v^, 311^1 swiWErfsa' Divislon Bench: Hon. Shri Fakhruddln, J & Hon. Shri Dtlio Deshmukh, J 3<M)9-200S "ShriHS. .Ahulwalia, couns^l forthe appellants in Cr.A.No.1082/2003. Shri Ashish Shukla, Govt. State/respondent. Heard. Shri Ahuhftalia, leamed cc|unsel for the appellants submits that he has preferred the appeal bearing|c^.A.^k^.1082/2003 on the instructions of the appeilants whereas another a^peal bearing Cr.A.No.3710004 has been preferred on behalf of the appeliarlts through legal aid. It is pointed out that both the aforesaid appeals are a passed by the Additional Sessions! Under the circumstances As prayed, time is granted. Cail out the matter after twc) Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge s|iprfcfift.TWRft'iftec^<RfWI< ^;3ri^ir3ii^T Advocate/Addl. Publio Prosecutor for the hsing out of judgment dated 18-10-2002 |Judge, Korba h S.T. N0.536C001. [the appeal bearing Cr.A.No.371/2004 is disposed of as superfluous. M.(Cri.lP.No.3036/2X)3 This application is filed i|i Cr.A.No. 1082/2003 for SLspension of sentence and grant of bail to the a[()pellants. The ground taken in the aftpiication regarding juvenite is concerned, learned counsel for the State subihits that first time in appeal this ground is taken and he prays for time to exa+iine and file reply. The prayer is not npposed ()y teamed counsel for the appellants. weeks for consideration of bail. Copy of this order be pl^ced in both the appeals i.e. Cr.A.No. 1082/'2003.&CrANo.371^004. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge (<ft^ys4)