IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17024 of 2011 Arun Kumar @ Arun Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 30.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 1996 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 359, 333, 437, 337 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that mob obstructing the police officials from taking dead bodies of three persons for post mortem when the police jeep was burnt and N.H.30 was blocked. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. hence, no specific accusation levelled against him and investigation is still pending and recently the petitioner has come to know about his involvement. It appears that Shashi Rai and Sanjay Rai have been granted regular bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. Nos.19010 of 2005 2 and 18690 of 2003 respectively. I see no reason for the learned court below not to give the same privilege to the petioner if the petioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned A.C.J.M., Barh, in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 1996 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)