[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.284 OF 2001 Shri.Upendra D.Shah ..Applicant Vs. Mr.Dilip Atmaram Nagpal & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.P.V.Samant Advocate for applicant Mr.S.V.Marwadi Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused no.3, the learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant. The complainant is present in person. 2. By judgment and order dated 5.12.2000 passed in CC No. 1630/S/1999 by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 40th Court, Girgaum, Mumbai, the applicant has been convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Appeal preferred by him, came to be dismissed, hence, this revision. [-2-] 3. The complainant states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. He states that the matter be compounded and accused may be acquitted therein. In view of the above facts, the matter is compounded and the accused is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Bail bonds of the applicant shall stand cancelled. 4. Revision application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]