THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9448 of 2010 26.4.2010 Between: M.Sriramulu, S/o.M.Mallaiah ...Petitioner And The District Collector, Medak District And others ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.9448 of 2010 ORDER: There is a dispute between the petitioner on one hand and Urella Ramaiah and five others (not parties to the writ petition) on the other hand with regard to the land admeasuring Acs.6.30 guntas in survey No.630 situated at Patancheru in Medak District. The long dispute was ultimately resolved by the second respondent in proceedings No.A3/6345/2007, dated 31.8.2007. It is an order passed to the following effect. In view of the facts reported by MRO/Tahsildar, Patancheru and in the absence of any authority in respect of the entries made in favour of the (6) individuals to whom notices were issued and also keeping in view the actual possession over the subject matter land by the applicant, the Tahsildar, Patancheru is directed to incorporate the name of applicant to an extent Acs.6.30 guntas only in survey No.630 according to his physical possession by deleting the names of the following individuals whose names have been incorporated in revenue records without any authority and issue pattadar pass books and title deeds to the applicant. S/Sri 1. Urella Ramaiah, 2. Harijan Lingaiah, 3. Hanmangiri, 4. Harijan Gandaiah, 5. Garela Mallaiah and 6. Nandu Ramgiri. In this writ petition the petitioner seeks implementation of the order and issue of pattadar pass book and title deed in respect of the said land. As the relief prayed is very limited, this Court need not elaborately refer to the background of the case. This writ petition is virtually filed as an execution petition. The jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or a writ petition is not meant as a forum to execute the orders of higher revenue authorities directing the lower revenue authorities. It is always for the petitioner to lodge a complaint to the Joint Collector about the non-implementation of the orders. The Writ Petition is misconceived, and is accordingly dismissed. ______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) April 26, 2010 YS