RSA No. 3488 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No. 3488 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 16.12.2011 Jasmero Devi and others ....Appellants Vs. Pritam Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Raghubir Tejpal, Advocate, for Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) CM No. 9805-C of 2011 Defendant No.6 Mariya @ Jagjit Kaur had died on 23.12.2009. In view of the averments mentioned in the application, same is allowed and legal representatives of deceased defendant No.6-Mariya @ Jagjit Kaur, as mentioned in para No.2 of the application, are brought on record, subject to all just exceptions. RSA No. 3488 of 2011 (O&M) This appeal is directed against the judgment & decree RSA No. 3488 of 2011 (O&M) 2 dated 31.05.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ambala, partly allowing the appeal preferred by the plaintiff- respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred as 'the plaintiff') against the judgment 25.09.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ambala, dismissing his suit for recovery. The first Appellate Court has clearly held that the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of Rs.1,57,500/- (Rs.1,40,000/- of sale consideration and Rs.17,500/- of stamp fee) from the defendants-appellants (hereinafter referred as 'the defendants') along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of sale deed, Ex.P1, i.e. from 02.09.1998 till realization of the amount, from the estate of Tek Chand, if any, inherited by the defendants. The Court had also created a charge on the estate of deceased-Tek Chand, which has been inherited by the defendants from him. Since the Appellate Court has already ordered to recover the said amount from the estate of Tek Chand, if any, therefore, no grounds are made out to interfere in the findings returned by the said Court. No substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) December 16, 2011 JUDGE ajp