1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.878 OF 2007 IN SUIT 837 OF 2007 Samir Narendra Jani .. Plaintiff Versus Madras Cements Ltd. & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.Vijay M. Vaghela for plaintiff CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 8th April 2008 P.C. . This chamber summons is duly served on all defendants. Affidavit proving service is filed. Affidavit discloses receipt of chamber summons and the Annexures thereto including affidavit in support. Affidavit proving service is taken on record. 2 2. Mr.Vaghela, upon taking instructions makes a statement that the plaintiff does not wish to now prosecute the suit against the defendant Nos. 2 to 7 and the suit be dismissed for want of prosecution as against them. The statement of Mr.Vaghela is accepted. Leave to withdraw the suit against defendant Nos. 2 to 7 is granted. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution only against these defendants. Suit to continue against defendant No.1. 3. Perused the chamber summons and affidavit in support. The chamber summons seeks amendments to the plaint on the basis of subsequent developments. Affidavit in support indicates what the developments are and none have disputed the same. All statements from paras 1 to 6 of the affidavit in support have gone uncontroverted. In such circumstances, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be 3 carried out within two weeks. Amended copy be served on first defendant within two weeks thereafter. Written statement/additional written statement, if any, be filed within four weeks thereafter. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)