IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.770 of 2011 ARJUN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.771 of 2011 ARJUN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 29.03.2011 Both the above stated petitions arise out of Murliganj P.S. Case No. 141 of 2010 registered under sections 302, 379, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. It is pertinent to mention here that petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 771 of 2011 appears to be uncle of the informant and as per first information report itself, he had not taken active part in the alleged crime rather it is only stated that he is conspirator of the alleged occurrence. So far as petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 770 of 2011 is concerned, the informant has specifically stated that at the time of alleged occurrence co-accused Sudisht Yadav was carrying Tangi whereas co-accused Birju Yadav was carrying three nut in his hand. She has nowhere stated in her Ferdbeyan about the weapon which was being carried by the petitioner. Furthermore, I find that it was co- accused Sudisht Yadav, who gave Tangi blow to the informant’s father and apart from the aforesaid injury the father of the informant had sustained fire arm injury. 2 Although, it is a case of double murder but considering the above stated facts as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with above stated Murliganj P.S. Case No. 141 of 2010 Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )