IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9410 of 2008. Decided on: 16th December, 2010. Ashok Kumar and another. …Petitioners. -Versus- H.P. State Electricity Board and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Harish Dod, Advocate vice Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. For respondent No. 4. : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioners, in a nut-shell, is that they should have been regularized as Helper (Store) w.e.f. 06.11.2002. Petitioner No. 1 was engaged on daily wage basis as Beldar on 02.04.1994 and petitioner No. 2 was engaged on daily wage basis on 01.07.1994. They have been appointed as T- Mates (work charged) and have joined their duties in the office of respondent No. 3. It has come in the reply that respondent No. 4 was appointed as Helper (Store) vide muster-roll No. 55. Since respondent No. 4 was appointed as Helper (Store), he has rightly been regularized as Helper (Store). In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the petitioners have been discriminated against. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 16, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 -