// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1762/2007 Mangilal S/o Shri Jaganath and Another Versus Additional District Judge No.5, Kota and Others Date of Order ::: 19.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri S.S. Yadav, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The plaintiff-respondent No.3 Nirmla Bai filed a suit for permanent injunction along- with an application for temporary injunction against the defendant-petitioners as well as defendant-respondent No.4 in the trial court, which was allowed and the defendants were directed to maintain the status-quo in respect of the disputed property as per the report of the Commissioner and they were further directed not to change the position thereof. Being aggrieved with the same, the defendants preferred an appeal but without success, hence the defendants have preferred this writ petition before this court. I have considered the submissions of // 2 // learned counsel for the petitioners in the light of reasons assigned by both the courts below for granting temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff-respondent during the pendency of the suit and, after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the orders passed by both the courts below so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//