IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2007 / 27TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 1269 of 2004(B) ---------------------- ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.9268/2004 Dated 01/07/2004 ) APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- C.R.SHAJI, CHERIKKAL HOUSE, KUNNIPPULLI, KOTTEKKAD POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ELECTORAL OFFICER (ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) PALAKKAD), PALAKKAD DISTRICT, AUTORIKSHAW DRIVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.P.606, PALAKKAD. 3. THE RETURNING OFFICER (UNIT INSPECTOR, MUNDOOR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT AUTORIKSHAW DRIVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD.NO.P.606, PALAKKAD. 4. THE ADMINISTRATOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT AUTORIKSHAW DRIVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD. NO.P.606, PALAKKAD. 5. THE PALAKKAD DISTRICT AUTORIKSHAW DRIVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO.P.606, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PALAKKAD. 7. MANIKANDAN C., S/O. SUKUMARAN NAIR, K.K.PARAMBU, AMBIKAPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHI KUMAR,SC. CO.OP.E COMMN. ADV. SRI.T.M.SUNIL BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, SMT. A.G. ANEETHA. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.A. NO. 1269 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. Learned counsel, Sri.M.Sasindran, appearing for the appellant submits that as on today, the reliefs sought for by the appellant do not survive for consideration of this Court. 2. Taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel, the Writ Appeal is disposed of, as having become infructuous. 3. In view of the order passed in the Writ Appeal, the relief sought for in I.A.Nos.2863 and 3503 of 2005 need not be considered by this Court. Accordingly, the said applications are also rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) Chief Justice (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/