1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.104 of 2007 (Archana w/o Santosh Patil Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.Y.Patil, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. P.M.Shinde, APP, for the respondent/State. Mr. M.S.Tour, Adv., h/f Mr. N.K.Kakade, Adv., for respondent nos. 2 to 6. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:20/8/2009 1. The grievance is, the order of acquittal dt.7.2.2007, for an offense under Sections 498-A, 325, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC is not challenged by the State. According to the Counsel, the learned Judge, while acquitting, has ignored the evidence and only based on no specific incident being quoted, has acquitted the accused. The Counsel desires to approach the Government through learned District Government Pleader for seeking 2 to challenge the order of acquittal dt.7th Feb.,2007, recorded by the second Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhusaval. It is for the original complainant to take proper recourse. 2. At this stage, permission to withdraw the present revision is granted. It is accordingly disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/104-07crra