/ézlaEZ/\ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB WRIT PETITIONXIO. SEWN 1 0 / PETITIONERS Ku. Thresiamma Joseph, D/o Late Shri.George Joseph, aged about 48 years Principal, Vimal Vidya Ashram High School, Mariguda, Chirgaon Post, Bakawand (Via)Bastar-District(CG) VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through~ The Secretary, Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribe and Backward ClassWelfareDepartment, ' D.K.S.Bhawan,Mantralaya, District— Raipur (C G) / 2. TheCommissioner Tribal Welfare Department, i Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribe ‘3' Development, District- Raipur (C G) 3, The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Jagdalpur, District—Bastar (C G) 4TTThe Secretary, Vimal Vidya Ashram High School, Mariguda, Chirgaon Post, Bakawand (Via) Bastar District, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITIOTV UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC AND FOR THE APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS —_—~—*_———~f——'~_‘'————J DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS w r l. Particulars ol‘the Petitioners :— As mentioned in the cause title. Iwgdi C 0‘ 6g? m zoo 311w W (WEI) mmm WW§wm émimm $.51 HON’BLE JUSTISE MR. ?R!T!NK ER DIWAKER 08-1 0-201 0: Smt. Smitha Ghai, PL for the that she is working in the IOO % Government added school but has n tbeen granted the fuil benefit of 5th pay scaie. ubmits that her case is squarely covered with the case decided b this Court on 9.22007 in WP. No. 698/2006 vide Annexure P—6 an at this stage the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with iiberty to file toroper representation before the responden s No. 17 & 3. He further submits that direction may be issaed to the aid respondents for deciding her representation expeditiousiy. State counsei has no objeoti n if the petitioner makes any such representation and the same is bein decided in accordance with lawi Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty as aforesaid. in t e eventuaiity of making any such representation by the petitioner wit in a period of one month from the . date of receipt of copy of this order the same wouid be decided by the competent authority within a further eriod of two months. it is made ciear that this Co rt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authorty concerned would be at iiberty to decide the representation in accorda ce with law. “ker D"Waker the petitioner. Shri Azad Siddiqui, counsel fo ate/respondents No. 1 to 3. Grievance of the petitioner i Ii ) Counsel for the petitioner