IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19223 of 2010 AJEET KUMAR SINGH, Son of Bimal Kumar Singh alias Bimleshwar Prasad Singh, resident of High School Para, P.S. Katihar, District-Katihar. .......Petitioner. Versus The Union of India through the C.B.I. Patna....................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 27.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.03.2010 in connection with a case registered under Sections 120B, 409, 418, 419, 420, 468, 471 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that 46 loan applications were processed on the basis of the fake title deeds which were verified and certified by the two lawyers of the Bank. It is alleged against the petitioner that he used to work as broker for processing the loan application and used to get the commission amount. It is further submitted that all loan amounts were transferred through the accounts of the loanees and no amount has ever been transferred to the account of the petitioner. Moreover the two Advocates against whom there 2 was allegation that they verified and certified the alleged deeds to be genuine which were subsequently found to be forged on verification from the Registration office have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 38373 of 2009 on 23.11.2009 and Cr. Misc. No. 26472 of 2009 on 12.03.2010. It is further contended that there is nothing on record that the petitioner worked as broker or received any commission. Learned counsel for the C. B. I. Mr. Bipin Kumar contended that on the basis of materials during investigation charge sheet has been submitted. Considering the aforesaid submission of the parties particularly the fact that petitioner was neither the loan sanctioning authority nor beneficiary, let the petitioner, Ajeet Kumar Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)(one of the bailors must be family member of the petitioner) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, C. B. I., North Bihar, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 07 of 2007 (arising out of R.C. 9A of 2007). 3 The learned court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)