IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17442 of 2011 Shashi Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03. 29.06.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406 of the I.P.C. and Section 47A of the Excise Act. On recovery of the huge quantity of liquor three persons were apprehended who disclosed that these liquors were purchased from the shop of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was licensee, hence he was not initially chargesheeted. The cognizance order was passed against the petitioner also subsequently. It is further submitted that no effort were made for getting the seized liquor chemically examined. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that even as per accusation the case under Section 47A of the Excise Act is not made out. It is further submitted that for the first time the warrant was issued in October, 2010 and summons were never received by the petitioner. The aforesaid contention of the petitioner constitute good ground for consideration of regular bail. Let learned Court below consider regular bail of the petitioner, in view of the observations made above, if 2 the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 45 of 2003 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)