IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5594 of 2010 CHATURBHUJ MANDAL son of Sumit Mandal Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 27.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 354, 380, 406, 363, 364, 511/34 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that four accused persons including this petitioner abducted the informant’s wife, his daughter and a suitcase containing Rs. 2.80 lacs. Learned counsel submits that the victim girl in her statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. has not named this petitioner as an accused. He further submits that it has come in the case diary that the victim girl was in love with Rishu Mandal and with her own consent she had gone out. Learned counsel further submits that the occurrence is dated 17.11.2009 whereas complaint case has been filed on 25.11.2009. Having heard the counsel for the parties. This Court observes that if the petitioner surrenders before the court below (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Bariarpur P.S. case no. 100 of 2009) and prays for regular bail, the same would be disposed of preferably on the same day also taking into consideration that the victim girl did not take his name in her statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. without being prejudiced by this order. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)