THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.M.P.No.2363 of 2011 and C.M.A. No.966 of 2005 COMMON ORDER: This application is filed with a prayer to record the compromise between the parties. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for respondent No.1 Respondent No.1 filed W.C.No.19 of 2005 before the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-III, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Commissioner’) against the second respondent, his employer and the appellant, the insurer. It was pleaded that he was working as a helper on a rig mounted vehicle bearing No. AP 29 7119, owned by respondent No.2 and insured with the appellant, and that on 02.09.2003, he received injuries in the course of employment. Respondent No.2 remained ex parte and the case was contested by the appellant alone. Through order, dated 14.06.2005, the Commissioner awarded a sum of Rs.1,75,713/- as compensation. The appellant challenges the said order by filing the appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, a compromise was arrived at between the appellant on the one hand and respondent No.1 on the other. Both of them agreed for reduction of the compensation by Rs.40,000/-. Respondent No.1 is present in the Court. He stated that he has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.1,35,713/- as compensation. Hence, the application is ordered and the appeal is allowed in terms of compromise. The appellant deposited the entire amount as required under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Respondent No.1 has withdrawn half of the deposited amount on the basis of the interim order, dated 07.10.2005, passed in the appeal. The appellant shall be entitled to withdraw a sum of Rs.40,000/- which is in deposit with the Commissioner and respondent No.1 shall be entitled to withdraw the balance. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:28.12.2011. kdl