IN THE HIGH CQURTOFJUDICATUREATBIL.ASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRTT PEtmON N0. fl O /200»/ PETmONER £, K !l!l RE8PQNDENTS >''^^' ^^^^^ •:<^^''"'1'.:.;': .'t*'^/ ^•'^'^. <?s°^ B.L.Gangwam S/q.ShriVaUram Gangwani, Aged about 47 years Administrative .Of5cer(Under Suspension), / NationalInsuranceCompanyLtd., Resident of Near Sindhi Gi.irudwara Besides Shree Pashumal Khubchandahi, Opp.Tubelight Patd Factory, Naharpara Districit - Raipur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS : 1. National Insuraiice Company Ltd;, Through its Ghairmari-Cuiri-MD, 3 Middleton Street, ; Kolkotta-71 : 2. Gfeneral Manager(Personriel), ; Natibnal Insurance CorapflnyLimited, 3Middleton Street, Ko]kbtta-71 : 3. Assistant Gerieral Manager & DisciplinaryAythority, Natipnal Insurance Company Limited, Pune Regk>nal..0ffiee, Asmani Plaza: 1248-A, Shivajinagar, Deccan • Gymkhana>Ptme 411004. : 4. Regional Manager, Nationallnsurance Coinpany Lt;d., AppoloTower^ 2MG Rd., Indore, Madhya Pradesb. : 5. Seni<3r Divisioiial Manager, National Insurance CQmpariyLtd., Mobin Mahal, GE Road, PB No.144, Raipur, ChhattisgarftS r^ .!.;i: 'T' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 AND 227 OF THE coNSTmjnoN OF INDIA Esi.F Utii^ii. XI-HC-22 311^(^1 f<Mi*^3ni?i s^"Hic)?*iI?ti 'r •gsr^iiite'J<<|awglu')^!I6«9ray; llPRtl IblltB^^^^^ ^Rre^" aiiiiugwiiu't'ylgd W.84.2004 SfariD.R. ^iaBi^al^coi^asel Shri Aldiil Agrawal, advancecoRy. Heard. fiar the petttfiBnfir. 'ancl Lawyer ftu" the Statc on E?'aSi:: aBS' This petitjon has b^i filed agflinsfc the OBder of suspension pf the petitior( pctitiorier aubmits fhat far HffOTng consideTed axi<t| onthe nierits of the case, in justicc will bc scrvcd ifa dat^: mafce a detaUed representatlt>n the competent autbQntyofty! of the petition and fhis ordel cM'itfd'ifl't yl4pi¥'^Ts<<! <fa't$K ^aifiiWSn^l r. Leanied cbunsel for the t|»epireacnt fhc petitioacT Baay bc glvtai au oppoitiuuty of .flfliig tlie dclalted nsprestaitatlcni before (he competent auCht^ity of (he resppndents, which shall he (ionsklered on its owh merifcs in acconlance wifch ]aw. |without expressir^ any aptoi6ii[i jhe opinaon ofthis Court, ends of j;tion is givcn tci thc pctitiQnCr.te ralstog Ms grievances belbre respondents alorig witti a copy ', wdtfain 15 days, and on such t^ft^lg^ XI-8C-22 Sii^'TO Rii^ ^if^^i al^^ sifl 'i3' B!li l'w"i'3qimffl'q|s»'gl*i<is,*&«»iy.. IWWI 91WSS "^ 2»0 'fote^' ^^ <w]^?ft ?<gtiwc^k^ A nRpnisentation»heing filed, <he competent flHfhority of the respondlexits shaB decide t^e saiae an its own merits In accordance wtthjlaw as earty tnonths fi-om ttMs date of griev^nce made dear ttiat ttany may avail the remedy avalla ^s pogsible preferably within two rc^clpt of the repTCsentation. It is stUl remalns, the petltloiier With the afbresaid ob^ervations, thls petitton stands idisppsedQfat'tlusstaee. Gonscqucntfy I.A.No.2'; ^i^tfl-^T 1gp3^f "if ^'^'^^c ^ aj^T <^^ ile imder the iaw. 5/2004 also standa dtoposed aft sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [<)»^^ 11^1