IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16125 of 2011 GHANSHYAM KUNWAR @ GHANSHYAM KUMAR Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. It would appear from perusal of the first information report that on 23.04.2010, the informant seized one, Tata Safari from the premises of petitioner and at the time of aforesaid seizure, the petitioner disclosed that the seized vehicle belonged to one, Sammu Mian. The informant directed the petitioner to produce the relevant documents of the aforesaid vehicle as well as its owner, namely, Sammu Mian before him but neither aforesaid Sammu Mian nor any documents of the seized vehicle, were produced and after that on 10.06.2010, the informant lodged Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 136 of 2010 on the basis of his self-statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that as a matter of fact, no recovery has been made from the premises of the petitioner. To prove the aforesaid submission, he drew my attention towards a news item which had been published in newspaper and which is Annexure-3 to this petition. It is also pointed out by him that the seizure list does not bear the signature of the petitioner which is evident from perusal of Annexure-2 to this petition. 2 Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Ghanshyam Kunwar @ Ghanshyam Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 136 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)