IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5566 of 2010 Date of decision: February 22, 2011 Mahinder Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Mandeep Kaur .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 26.7.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sirsa, allowing the application filed by the respondent- wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Having scrutinized the impugned order, it transpires that the maintenance of `5000/- per month has been awarded to the respondent as well as to the minor child while taking into consideration the income as well as the family status of the parties. The maintenance so awarded cannot be said to be on the higher side. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. February 22, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge