IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.18627 of 2011 Date of Decision.03.10.2011 M/s Samana Ply Board Pvt. Ltd., Todarpur Rajla Road, Samna now M/s Trishul Teak Products Pvt. Ltd., Rajla Road, Samana, District Patiala through its Director Shri Sahil Garg .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary to Govt. of Punjab, Department of Industries, Civil Secretariat Punjab, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. N. K. Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-4), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by respondent No.2 within a particular time. 2. The representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 if the same is represented again along with copy of this order within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 03, 2011 Pankaj*