lc<- ,ratS*E6 t" !^lff^^a PETITIONER : ^ c^-i^ INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHO&mSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fSlNo. ^O^ /2007(S.B.) ^SSthebrasi Choudhary S/o'"Shri Deonath Choudhary /^" .Aged about 45 years, Asst. Teacher, R/o VUlage -Ameri Post- Deogaon Via- Sariya, Tah.-Sarangarh, Dist: Raigarh- (C.G.) ,^>- ... ..Wfy" '•••"'^w' VERSUS w RESPONDENTS v^. /2; 3-0°^ State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raigarh, Dist : Raigarh-(G.G-) ,-r» ,< t" }"'< - U1SL ; K.ajlKiUU-l^'.U.] r<sh.^'^\ r Block Education Officer ^ fi.-O-^ Block - Raigarir Dis ^.^w Block - Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H GOURT OF CHMATTIS6ARH AT BILASPtffl WP.fS1frJo.909Qf2(K17 Petitioner Sahebram Ghouclhcry Versus Re^iondents : StctteofGhharttisgarhandothers SB: Hon'bleMr.JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. J Present:Mr.VineetKumarPcndey,Advoc!ateforthepetitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Pcnel lawyer for the respondents/S'tate. O R D E R yassedon 1t)is l5t1' bay of February. 2C07) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 1.3.82 as Assistant Teacher fixed poy scaleof Rs. 150/-. After comptetion of two years probation, he wass gronted regular poiy scale of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Learned counsel eppearing for -the petitioner sybmits that the issue involved in the aise is astowhether the petitioner is entitled to regulor pay scate w.e.f. the date of initul oppointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, hereinwus considered by the Mndhya Prode^i State Adrainistrative Tribunat, Jabalpur in O.A.No. 2745/89 (Madhukdnt Yadu ond 56 others Vs. 5tate ofM.P. & o'thers), wherein it was held that the simitarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matl'er was taken-up to •t+ie 1-lon'ble Sjpreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civii) No. 6892/93. TTie said petition was dismjssed by-t-he Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding •the decision of •the Tribunal to the effect "^:- - —.-^ l~>, Babfu ZP that the Teaehers/Assistant-Teachers are entitled to regutar (xiy scalefromddteofinitialappointmeht. , 4. teamed counsel appearing for the petitioner furt+ier submits that this Gourt, while considering the same issye in Aeman Jain Vs. The State Sovemment of Chhatt-isgarh & (mother (W.P. No. 1463 of 2CX36) t»yprder dated 10.11.2006, hasgranted regutar puy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. 5. Learned counsel oppearing for •rt»e pgrties jointty submit that-this case is squarefy covered by the decision of+hisCourt in ttiecase of Aeman Jain Vs. The State ©ovemmentof Chhatti^arh & enother CSupra). 6. In view of 1+lat, -this petition is disposed of in the same terms. No wder aS to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge "t.