IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7810 of 2009 1. NATHUNI PRASAD, S/o Raghubir Prasad 2. Birendra Prasad, S/o late Dewan Prasad 3. Ram Babu Sah, S/o late Dewan Sah 4. Bishun Dayal Prasad, S/o Suryadeo Prasad 5. Sunil Prasad, S/o Bishun Dayal Prasad 6. Anil Prasad, S/o Bishun Dayal Prasad 7. Raj Kishore Sah, S/o Thaka Sah Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the land dispute, imaginary and false allegations were levelled regarding entering into the house and committing loot of the household articles followed by non-execution of the sale-deed in compliance of agreement to sell for which title suit was pending. So, finding the allegations false, final form was submitted by the Police recommending institution of the case under Section 182 and 211 of I.P.C. even then on protest-com-complaint, cognizance has been taken but in any case, petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 187 of 1996, Complaint Case no. 841 of 1996, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)