1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WHHEQH 853mm M.A. No. g Li’of 2005 v Appeal Valued at Rs. 4,32,000/- Appellant : / 1. Chhedilal, son of Bhaiya Ram aged about 61 years, 2 Smt. Urmila bai, Wife of Chhedilal, 4/. aged about 51 years, both the appellants are Suryavanshi by case and resident of Village Nargoda, Thana Seepat, Tahsil and District'Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS §espondent : Q/l Ramavatar Suryavanshi, X / son of Kartik Ram Suryavanshi, aged about 38 years, Resident of Village Nargoda, Thana Seepat, Tahsil & District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. United India Insurance Company Limited, Through the Branch ., Manager, 68, Indira Commercial Complex, Transport‘Nagar, . Korba, Chhattisgarh. ’ Policy No. 194602/31:01/12911. _ 3. Smt. Jyoti, Wife of Rajendra 6/ Kumar, aged about ‘23 years, Resident of Village Nargoda, Thana Seepat, Tahsil & .. District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. / LOK - ADALAT Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Bilaspur Case No..'.“.§’i“0§ll of 1‘305/ W£%M 2‘ QWké , Appetlant/s Respondent/s f}, I . ' ’ Appellantwith / by 'Shri Respondent with /by Shri > 7(Passed on. §§l0q/{w ................. ) etition. The terms are just. We' hereby Parties fiie a compromise p record the compromise and pass an award in tribunal) Lamfm 92 mam; [ISOM mg Mal? QWcA / / $¥& argoamf 23M ‘ Wéiad‘@ {VA/963) qmhm {fu ($6 W53Wm ’ \iri‘¥a__\ , . 1sd/~_~ - _: d :R.N. Chandr'akar “‘1' V if .’ - Judge. Sd/- order that appeirant/respondent no.r.€lJ.3n.$¥r§ms%..§éu respondent / appellant a sum of Rs. ?‘3‘9"o/* a“ and shaii pay to (.........mi‘@7b ........mQgMW.. ............) by ........... o‘icompensation V........ in words rm WW“ in additicn to the amount already-paid .....