CWP No. 2298 and CWPs No. 2332 and 2333 of 2009 13.7.2009 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No. 2298/2009 and 2333/2009. Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate for the petition in CWP No. 2332/2009. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1 in CWP No. 2298/09 & CWP No. 2333/09 and for respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP No. 2332/09. Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate for the respondent- University. In sequel to common order dated 9.7.2009, the report was furnished by Mr. B.C. Negi in a sealed cover. The sealed cover has been opened in the presence of the parties. We have gone through the experts’ opinion given by the Professors to whom the questions No. 15, 35, 59 and 155 were referred. The experts have concurred with the paper setters key answers. In other words, the contention put forth by the petitioners have not been accepted by the experts. In these circumstances we accept the report of the experts and the same is permitted to be taken on record. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petitions and the same are dismissed. No costs. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 13, 2009. *awasthi*