1 MNM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1288 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1093 OF 2009 Bhausingh Gulab Pawar & Ors. ...Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Sandeep K. Shinde, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. A.A. Mane, A.P.P for the State CORAM: SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 1ST DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1.This application is for bail filed on behalf of both the accused in this case. Accused No.1 is the son of accused No.2. They are charged and convicted for offence committed under Section 307 of the I.P.C. 2.The incident in which offence is stated to have been committed is between family members who are owners of neighbouring plots of land. In the scuffle that ensued two weapons being one mattock and one spade was used. The complainant was injured by the accused No.2. He sustained 4 simple injuries by the spade which is shown 2 to be a blunt object on the back head and thigh. The other injured witness was assaulted by the accused No. 1 with mattock. The medical evidence shows 5 injuries on the head of the injured witnesses including on the frontal lobe of the brain. He was required to be removed to the home of complainant by the ladies who were present. 3.The evidence, therefore, shows severe injuries caused by accused No.1. No case for bail is made out on behalf of the accused. The learned Advocate on behalf of the accused No.1 concedes that he does not press for bail on his behalf. 4.The accused No.2 has assaulted only with a blunt object being spade and caused simple injuries. The accused No.2 is released on bail in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or two local sureties. 5.The accused No.2 shall report before the relevant police station on the first Monday of each month. He shall not go anywhere near the land of the complainant pending the Appeal. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)