IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NO.2506 OF 2010. Date:15.04.2010 Between:- Natla Venkata Satyavathi ..Petitioner/A-2 And The State of A.P., rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .. Respondent ORDER:- The second accused, who appeared in person, is the petitioner. She is accused of offences punishable under section 498-A/34 I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, along with others. The petitioner is mother-in-law of the defacto complainant. The petitioner wants quashing of procedings in Crime No.9 of 2010 of II Town (Law and Order) Police Station, Rajahmundry, without impleading the defacto complainant as party to this petition and behind the back of the defacto complainant. 2. The petitioner stated that they looked after the defacto complainant properly and that inspite of it, false case was foisted against her and that there was no demand for any additional dowry much less there was any dowry paid at the time of marriage. 3. Truth or falsity of allegations in report given by the defacto complainant cannot be subject matter of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is for the police to collect evidence on the report and come to a proper conclusion basing on evidence to be collected by the police during investigation. It is stated that because of this case, the police are harassing her. The First Additional Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the question of the police arresting the petitioner again in this crime may not arise, if the petitioner had already given bonds along with sureties, as per orders of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Rajahmundry. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 15th April 2010 AMD