iRSIS!,?'iB'^$iKll';^IISISiNISi8!S8^^ ^^v^^^v^Vt/n,^^ :^ ^'^^^^^^^^^^^^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l Single Banch PBTITIONER ^LAINTIFF CIVIL REVISION N0. ^ ^ ^ 72003 imt Samund Bai, aged about 50 years,wifeOfShriSudamaRawat, Resident of Amarpoti, Tah and Distt. Durg(Chhattisgarh) w •^ RESPONDENTS fiBFENDANTS ^ ^ ...-.^" ^ . .i ^n^^' VERSUS .1. ..^.^:^- Chiman Lal, age 32 years son of Shri Brajram Sahu Brajraj Sahu, aged about 50 years, sonofLate Baladu Sahu. Both are residents ofvillage Kasaridih, P.S., Tah., and Distt. Durg(CG) ^" ^ ^' The State of Chhattisgarh, through : The District Collector, Distt. Durg (Chhattisg^h) CIVII.REVIsit^NUNDERSECnONfiS OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCE^UR^.il^OS^ F XI-HC-22 ^Tl^T^T f^ii<=h 3:n^r 5h^i<=»i ^F^a ^^ ^•f '^^^NT^, ^^|<y4i<o, %<rti^^ 3^t^1^^ -^^ cr^'^^r338/D3 ^WW 5hHlch •^t 200 ^TT^T ^TW^Ii^ 07.01.2004 Heard. In view of the judgmen Shiva Shakti Cooperative <^i<<t<n'4l<i HH<riY ^ f^'<l <P»i^i< '^^Tf^TH^T^T ^ Shri Shivraj Singh, cou^sel for the applicant. Shri Rajesh Pandey, Go|yt. Advocate for tfae State, ^ of the Apex Coiirt ui the casc of Housmg Society, Nagpur vs. M/s.SwarajDevelopersSs Or^., reported in JT2003 (4) SC 2S5, Ifeamed counsel wants to wltijidraw this revislon with llberty to avail the attemative reniedy ]|ncluding the writ petition. The revision is dispose^ of as withdrawn with the Uberty aforesaid. However, the ^opies of the orderg and the docum.ents | be returned to it^e learned counsel after retaining '!' .- tlie plioto cbpies LliereQf. Certified copy as per ni|les. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge