3aW m, W W m..m?{g}2k&&o m 200% m m (W) WWW WW wm aqafcmm PET§T!ONER: Dr. Prahlad Ku‘mar, S/o Lt. Shri Bihari La! Lautre, Aged about 37 yearS, Occugaiion Veteniary Assisiani Surgeon, Veterniary Hospita! Kutru: Eés:i. Dantewada at present Béjapur (CG) Versus— RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh; Thmugh Secretary, Depadmem cf Agricuiiure (Vetemiary). Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 7 Depuiy Director Veterniary Services v Baniewada, Disé. Dantewada (CG) Coilectur, Bijapur, Distt. Bijapur (CG) (Wyit Petition under Article 261227 of the Constitution of indie} inaie Bench: Hon’ te Shri Dhirendra Mishra 5-1 £909:— E Miss Dipali Pandey, counseif r the petitioner. Smt. Smite Ghai, Panel Lawy r for the State/respondents. t Heard. Grievance of the petitioner i that he is presentiy posted as Veterinary Surgeon at Veterinary Hospital, Ku ru, District Dantewada. The petitioner was transferred Vide order dated 30": June, 2008 (Annexure-Pl’l) to Veterinary Hospital, Belargeon, District Dhamtah on his own request. However, he has not been relieved from Dantewada in pu uance of the above transfer order. Learned counsel for the pet tioner submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to fiie fresh representat n tor redressal of his grievances before reseondent No.2, who in‘turn, may e further directed to deeide the same withini specified period. l S J. § Learned counsei for the Si elrespondents submitted that in case the petitioner tiles fresh representation f0 relieving himself in compliance of the order J of Annexure—PM before respondent > .2 Within a pemd of 15 days from today‘ - the 'same shall be considered and ecided by respondent No.2 within a iuriher ‘ period of Eweeks from ihe date of re eipt of repiesentaiion. in View of the submissions de by ieamed counsel for the pariées, the insiant’petition is disposed of wih liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation within a period of 15 ays from ioday before respondent No2. On such representation being made by he peiiiioner, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent No.2 wi n a further period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. Wm W1 ‘ 209 mm (W3) %3if?mm WWW QK’L mmo‘wm , E 7 Sd/— . Dhirendra Mishra Judge ' 0 a t i