IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7809 of 2010 NAGESHWAR, son of Late Etbari, R/O Yarpur Ambedkar Colony, P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Commissioner- Cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Patna Municipal Corporation through its Mayor, Budh Marg, Patna. 3. Municipal Commissioner Cum Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 4. Chief Accounts Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 5. Executive Officer, Nutan Rajdhani Anchal, Patna Municipal Corporation, 10, Harding Road, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 4.5.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in paragraph 4 of the writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of June, 2004 as a Sanitary Worker under the New Capital Circle of the respondent-Corporation, his pensionary benefits have not been revised in terms of the revised pay scale admissible to the employees of the Corporation with effect from 1.1.1996 despite representation. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the unpaid claims, the petitioner proposes to raise his grievances by way of representation before the Municipal Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, 2 Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)