IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 11652 of 2006(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- VINOY ANTONY, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR, MADECKAL HOUSE, MUVATTUPPUZHA P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SRI.K.I.SAGEER, SRI.R.S.HARI KUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, P.W.D.BUILDING AND LOCAL WORKS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.W.D. BUILDINGS AND LOCAL WORKS, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D. BUILDINGS DIVISION, IDUKKI, PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/02/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH , J. ................................................................................... W.P.(C) No. 11652 OF 2006 ................................................................................... Dated this the 20th February, 2007 J U D G M E N T Writ Petition is filed with the following prayers: “i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext. P16 and P17(a) proceedings of the 4th and 3rd respondents. ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to take a final decision in Ext.P14 and P15 proceedings of the 4th and 3rd respondents and to communicate the said decision to the petitioner, forthwith. iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext. P5, P8, P9, P12, P17 and P18 representations, forthwith.” 2. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to look into the representations submitted by the petitioner with notice to him and take appropriate decision thereon in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Interim order dated 25.04.2006 will continue till such time. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. lk