THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH SA.MP.NO.2525 OF 2010 IN S.A.NO.1135 OF 2006, S.A.NO.1135 OF 2006 AND S.A.NO.1178 OF 2006 COMMON ORDER Since both the appeals are connected, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.23/1995 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Peddapalli against the defendants for partition of the suit schedule properties. The defendants in O.S.No.23/1995, filed another suit in O.S.No.82/2001, against the plaintiff and another in O.S.No.23/1995 for perpetual injunction, restraining them from interfering with the peaceful possession over the suit house bearing no.4-8-88, situate at Peddapalli. The trial court clubbed both the suits and passed common judgment and decree dated 03.07.2004, by preliminary decreeing the suit in O.S.No.23/1995 and holding that the plaintiff in O.S.No.23/1995 is entitled to half share in the suit schedule properties and for separate possession and dismissing the suit in O.S.No.82/2001. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants in O.S.No.23/1995, filed two separate appeals in A.S.Nos.48 and 49 of 2004, respectively, on the file of IV Additional District Judge (Fast Tract Court), Karimnagar, (A.P.). By judgment and decree dated 23.08.2006 the lower appellate court, dismissed both the appeals, confirming the common judgment and decree of the trial court. Hence, the present second appeals. 3. During the pendency of the second appeal, the appellants in S.A.No.1135/2006 filed a petition in S.A.M.P.No.2525/2010 in S.A.No.1135/2006 stating that they have compromised the matter and sought to pass decree in terms of the compromise. 4. Both the parties are present before the court and submitted that they have compromised the matter and hence in terms of the compromise sought to decree the suit in O.S.No.23/1995. 5. The parties were identified by their counsel and all the parties as well as their counsel signed the memorandum of compromise. The same is made part of the order and SAMP.No.2525/2010 is allowed. 6. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the appeal in S.A.No.1135/2006 is dismissed and judgment and decree in O.S.No.23/1995 is confirmed. In terms of the compromise, the appeal is S.A.No.1178/2006, stands disposed of. There shall be a common decree in both the second appeals as per the terms of the compromise. No costs. AVS --------------------------- 25—06—2010 Note: Issue C.C. in two days. B/O