IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11661 of 2005 Chandradeo Prasad son of Late Bangali Prasad, resident of Arwal Sipah, P.S.- arwal, District- Jehanabad at present resident of Village Jehanabad, P.S. Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. Versus 1. The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Sultan Palace, Parivahan Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Gaya. ----------- 07 19.08.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation. None appears on behalf of the State. The petitioner has claimed his first and second time bound promotion since the petitioner joined as conductor in the year 1971. The claim of the petitioner is that other similarly situated persons were granted time bound promotion. Though the petitioner earlier filed C.W.J.C. No. 8230/03 for the similar relief which was disposed of on 18.08.203 with a direction to the respondent Corporation to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner. The representation of the petitioner was consequently rejected by the authority, as contained in Anexure-5, when the contempt application being M.J.C. No.1143/04 was dismissed on 16.08.2005 by this Court with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedy, consequently the present writ application has 2 been filed. In the first counter affidavit the claim was denied on the ground that corporation is not providing time bound promotion to the employers but in the second counter affidavit filed on 04.12. 2007 it has been stated that on 03.10.2007 the Road Transport Corporation has revised its earlier decision and now the time bound promotions are being given to the employees of the Corporation and the petitioner’s claim is under consideration. It is further submitted that till date the petitioner has not been provided the time bound promotion. Let the Road Transport Corporation pass appropriate order in the light of the statement made in para 12 of the second counter affidavit within a period of two months of the receipt of the order and pay all the consequential benefits to the petitioner within a period of four months of passing of the orders. With the above observation, this writ application is disposed off. Amrendra/ ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)