® c^ 'yo IN THE HIGH'COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION (C)NO. ^ ] C'^/QF 2007 PETITIONER Jogendra Singh Son of 3anaksai, aged about 32 years, Caste ^^^--•"^'•V' Pathari, Resident of Village ou;yp5ly^-...••••.. ... - . .. „ ^-l--" ...^ f-<^^'"'\'^--t~"' Wt" '.••'' y^' p 1 '.4'0"> *••-" 6*.e' RESPONDENTS Harratikra, Tahsil Syrajpur, District Surguja (C.G,). VERSUS . . ^ . 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 'i ¥- ^s^ ^.o. s^ ii^K'-.-Ksn,.^^ ^5'S sfliiff%, ^'"^ \J*> CV.K. PANDEY) ADVOCATE 2. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) (Prescribed Aythority) Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). ; , ;• . , :' , 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4. Dashmat D/o Shri Shiv Prasad, Caste Lohar; (Sarpanch); ^- • . -• . . • ' ' 5. Indirawati Wife of Ambika Singh, .Caste Pathari; 6. VintiWife of Bgsant, Caste Uraon; 7. Urmila . Wife of Birsai, Caste Uraon; =* •3i3 NoiiiaiHoyd 'iavyoiiy33 'snwvaNVN jp aynivN 31-11 NI iraM =io 33Nvnssi yod VIQNI do NOTiniiisN03 3Hi do^zz ^^^Ilyv yaoNn Noiiiiad iiyM •(•3-3) efnBjns puisia 'jndfejns IISLJEI 'ej>|i}ej-ieH 4eAeL|3ued 96e||!A '(J33y^0 6u!ujnisy lueisissv) 'jndCejng ja3yjo AjeuusiaA • . lueis.issy 'L<B!S ejpusdiN 'OT. '("3'3) efngjns IOUISIQ '-indfejns |isqei /ej>|nejjeH ^eAeqyued 36e||!A '033yj0 Guipissjd) jnd|equjes [00433 9|PP!W 'js^seLupesH 'iueMuos '|e|6uey "6 •(•3-3) efnfijns PPISIQ '-indfejns iisyei ^ej>|Re-ue|-| . IBAeqoued 36e||!A '(Jsoy^o 6u!p!ssjd) Jndefey 100433 S|PP!|A| '-isiseujpBSH /L|6uis ueAejeN '8 '('EI'O) efnBjns V-IISIQ 'jndrejns I'sqei 'ej>inejjBH s6&||!A\ j0 siuspissj aje ||v s^ ^\<~ HIGH COLTRT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fC) No. 4104 of2007 PETITIONER : Jogendra Singh. \rERSUS 11ESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisearh&Others. WRIT PETITION LTNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONST1TL!TION 0?!NDIA SB: Hpn'ble Shri Satisii K. Agsnhotri, 3. Present; Shi'i T.R.Chandrakar, Advocate appearmg on behalfof Shi'i V.K.Paiidey, Advocate for the pelitioner. Shi-i A.V.Shridhar. Panel Lawv'er &r the State. Sliri M.V.Paranjpe, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. (Passed on 21st day of October, 2010) 1. Leamed courisel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subniits fhat wifh the passage of tinie, tlus petition has become inlhictuous. t 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not conti-overt the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become ' infructuous. ,, Sd/- 1., Sadsh K.Agmhotri . Judge Amit'