SBCWP No.1775/2009 Seema & Anr. Vs. Revat Singh & Anr. 1 SBCWP No.1775/2009 Seema & Anr. Vs. Revat Singh & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : - 16.3.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Vikas Balia, for the petitioners. Mr. SD Purohit, for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved against the order of the trial court dated 4.2.2009 by which the petitioners' application filed under Order 8 Rule 1 (3) CPC was dismissed by the trial court. After going through the facts mentioned in the pleading including the reasons given in the application filed under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, I do not find any reason to exercise the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed only on this ground. However, the petitioner shall have liberty to challenge the impugned order in appeal in case any occasion arises for doing so. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-