IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24242 of 2011 Anand Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ***** 03. 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Laheri (Biharsharif) P.S. Case No. 114/2011, for offences under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, is one of the named accused in this case of kidnapping of minor daughter of the informant. Submission is that the victim on recovery in her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has not named the petitioner, though named others. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor brought in out statement of the eye- witnesses submitted that petitioner is one of the three persons involved in kidnapping of the victim who in paragraph 7 of her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure though has named two, but simultaneously stated that some more friend of named were also involved who are not known to her. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner appears not entitled for the privilege sought. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby refused. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)