^ ^ !•' ffiGH COURT OF CHHA:mS(iARH AT BILA8FUR WR1T PETmON (8) No. 5051 of2009 PETmONER : Mohan Kumar Burade, aged about 47 years, son of Laxman Burade, at present working as a 'Torester", Bastar Forest Divisioa Darbha range, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSU8 RESPONDEm'S : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Forest Department D.K.S. BhawaiL Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Consen^ator of Forest Forest Department, Raipw (C.G.) 3. Conservator of Foi'est Jagdalpur Circl^ District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Divisional Forest Qfiicer, Bastar, Forest Division at Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) WRJT PETmON L1NDER AR'HCLE 226 OF rI'HE CONSTITimON OF INDIA SB: Hon»bleShn Satish K. A^nihoM.J. Pre8e3it:8hri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate forthe petitioner. 81m Y.S/lliakur, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/respondeysts. OKDERCORAL) (Passed on 07 day of September, 2009) 1, Lean3ed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tte? petitioner was promoted from the post of Forest Guard to the po§tof Forest^ by order dated 29tfl May, 2009 (Annexure P/l). Thereafter, the petiti<mer was transfenred vide order dated 30 June, 2009 (Asnexure P/3) from his present place ofposting i.e. Rajur Darbha Division, Bastar to Dajitewada showing his designation as Forest Guard, when the petitioner has already been promoted to the post of Forester, aad as such, the impugned transfer order is bad. Shri Koshta forther submits tiiat in tfae impugaed tonsfer c^ ^ 4. order, it has been meiitioned that the transfer has been made on the request of the petitloner himself. howeven the petitioner has never made any application to that effect. Shri Thakur- leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for tte State/respondents submits that meirtiomng of thc (tesignation of the petitioner as Forest Guard in fhe tramfer order appeans to be a typmg mistake. Since tfie petitioner has ah-eady made a representation on 2 September, 2009 (Amiexure P/4) pointing out certain dtficiencies in the order and for redressal ofhis grievances, the same shall be ccmsider^l and if there is any mistake, the same shall be amended and rectified accordmgly, and appropriate orders shall be passed. as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period oftwo weeks from today . In view of the foregoing, accordir^ to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner- nothing survives fbr adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Axnit