IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23903 of 2011 Ram Binay Chaupal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 15.5.2011 in a case registered under sections 376, 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the IPC. It would appear from perusal of the contents of the first information report that informant established physical relationship with the petitioner by her own sweet will as the petitioner had promised to marry with her. So far as allegation of 307, 379 of the IPC is concerned, the same is not specific against the petitioner. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that informant is maid servant of one Chandra Kumar Yadav and wife of Chandra Kumar Yadav as well as wife of the petitioner contested Mukhiya election and aforesaid Chandra Kumar Yadav set up the informant to put pressure upon the petitioner so that petitioner should pressurize her wife to withdraw from the aforesaid election. Taking into consideration aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Ram Binay Chaupal, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipur District Darbhanga in Bahera (Alinagar) P.S. Case no. 23/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)