IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2198 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 03/11/2004 in WP NO : 15955 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: B.H.E.L (R & D) Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., TAB NO.122, Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093, rep., by its President, Sri C.N.Srinivasan ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Registrar/ The Divisional Co.operative Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad. 3 M.R.C.Prasad, s/o sri M.Venkata Rama Rao, BHEL (R & D) Employees Co.op.Housing Society Ltd., BHEL (R & D), Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093. 4 M.R.Prabhakar, s/o Sri M.M.Jaya Rao, BHEL (R & D) Employees Co.operative Housing Society Limited, BHEL (R & D), Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093. 5 R.V.S.Krishna Dutt, s/o late Sri R.V.R.Sastry, BHEL (R & D) Employees Co.operative Housing Society Limited, BHEL (R & D), Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093. 6 M.S.V.B.Subba Rao, s/o Sri M.Ganeshwara Rao, BHEL (R & D) Employees Co.operative Housing Society Limited, BHEL ( R & D ), Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093. 7 L.N.Sepuri, s/o Sri S.Suinganna, B.H.E.L. (R& D) Employees Co.operative Housing Society Limited, BHEL (R & D), Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093. 8 T.Jayakar, Ex-Vice President, BHEL ( R&D), Employees Co.operative Housing Society limited, BHEL (R & D), Vikas Nagar, Hyderabad-500 093. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.M.V.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondents 3 to 8: None The Court made the following Oral Judgment: (per Sri Devinder Gupta, CJ) We see no ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned single judge dismissing the writ petition, which was filed questioning the order passed by the 2nd respondent dismissing I.A. No. 2 of 2004. In case, final proceedings would conclude against the appellant-writ petitioner, there is no impediment for the appellant-writ petitioner to question the same in appropriate proceedings, but, it cannot file an appeal against the order passed on an interlocutory application. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________________ DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ Date: 30th December, 2004 _______________________ M. NARAYANA REDDY,J Pnb To 1 The Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Registrar/ The Divisional Co.operative Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad. 3 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Cooperation, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.(OUT) 4 Two C.D. copies