IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5030 of 2011 AMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.03.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 341, 302 & 307 of the I.P.C. The petitioner was named in the F.I.R. but subsequently during investigation the accusation was found false and final form was submitted which was subsequently accepted by learned court-below. It is submitted by learned Senior Counsel that the said order was never been challenged by the prosecution. However now on the basis of the evidence of Dinanath Yadav and Bijli Devi the petitioner has been summoned by learned Addl. Sessions Judge exercising his power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. Considering the fact that accusation was found false during investigation and now the petitioner is summoned in exercise of power under Section 319 Cr.P.C., let the petitioner Amar Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court-below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 4th Addl. Sessions Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sessions Trial No.342 of 2008 subject to condition laid down under 2 Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. The learned trial-court will accept the bail bonds of the petitioner on the undertaking that the petitioner will appear regularly before the trial-court and on default by the petitioner for three consecutive occasions, the trial-court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)