IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25602 of 2010 MOHIT KUMAR, SON OF LATE AMARNATH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report which pertains to snatching of the Mobile of the Informant but subsequently, his named transpired in the confessional statement of the co- accused and, thereafter, the looted Mobile was recovered from his house. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 24.5.2010 and the petitioner’s mother undertakes responsibility of the petitioner’s conduct after he is released from jail custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Rampur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the mother of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change 2 in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner is an accused in only one other case which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)