IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1103 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2506/2007 Dated 22/01/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. MANJU MOHANAN KOVVALIL, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O MOHANAN IVTH YEAR BSC, NURSING STUDENT, COLLEGE A.C.M.E. PARIYARAM, P.O., PARIYARAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. ANJU S. NAIR, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O SASIDHARAN NAIR IVTH YEAR OF B.S.C NURSNG STUDENT, COLLEGE OF NURSING, ACME PARIYARAM P.O., PARIYARAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.PUSHPODHARAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENETS 1 TO 5 AND PETITIONERS 1 TO 8 AND 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, KANNUR UNIVERSITY, KANNUR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, KANUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KANNUR. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, KANNUR UNIVERSITY, KANNUR MANGATTUPARAMBA COLLEGE OF NURSING. 4. THE PRINCIPAL KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING, KATTAMPALLY, P.O. KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, A.C.M.E.COLLEGE OF NURSING, PERIYARAM, P.O. PARIYARAM, KANNUR 670 503. 6. SANEESH T.P., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O KUNHIRAMAN , IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT, KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING, KARRAMPALLY, P.O. KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTICT. 7. AJAL, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O C.M.AJAYAKUMAR IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE, OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY P.O., KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 8. REJO JOSE, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.P.J.JOSEPH, IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY, P.. KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 9. RESNA R, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.RAMACHANDRAN, IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY, P.O.KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 10. BAJITHA GANESHAN,AGED 21 YEARS, D/O GANESHAN, IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY, P.O.KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 11. AKILA M, AGED21 YEARS, D/O GANESHAN,IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY, P.O.KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 12. NITHEESH, NARAYANAN, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. V.V.NARAYANAN, IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY, P.O.KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 13. SANKAR M.G. , AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. MANOHARAN, IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT KOYILI COLLEGE OF NURSING KATTAMPALLY, P.O.KATTAMPALLY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 14. PINKYMOL K.K., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. K.P. KRISHNANKUTTY, IVTH YEAR BSC NURSING STUDENT,COLLEGE OF NURSING A.C.M.E. PARIYARAM P.O., PARIYARAM, KANNUR DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- R.P.NO. 1103 OF 2008 IN W.P.C. NO. 2506 OF 2007 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2008 O R D E R Review petitioners were permitted to write third year examinations without passing second year examinations because at that time they had applied for revaluation of answer books of second year papers. Since review petitioners did not pass second year examinations on revaluation, University declined to publish the result of third year examinations which were written by the review petitioners under court orders. Review Petition is now filed stating that results of the same examinations withheld in the case of some other petitioners were ordered to be published by this Court vide order in RP 689 of 2007 dated 31.7.2007. The prayer is therefore to allow this review petition also following the order in the above case. However, standing counsel for the University opposed stating that there is difference between review petitioners herein and the review petitioners in the other case because those petitioners passed the second year in the supplementary 2 examination held in 2007 itself whereas in the case of review petitioners herein they passed the examination only now. However, I find that earlier review petition was allowed only for the sake of consistency because this Court in Annexure II judgment produced along with that Review Petition gave similar relief to some others. For the sake of consistency I allow this Review Petition also directing the University to publish the withheld third year examination results of the review petitioners. Issue photocopy today itself. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk