1- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIOxNER Writ Petitton (S) No. 40S7 of200S : Babban Tiwari aged about 51 years, son of Late Shri Brijbihari, Resident ofKhongapani (West), Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretaiy, Department of School Education, Mantmlaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Administrator/Principal I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director/Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada,Raipur(CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER .^R'HCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTirUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K»Asanihotri, J.) Present : Shri R.K. Jaisvval, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. QRALORDER (Passed on 29 day ofJiily, 2008) 1. . With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher, working in I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), mn and managed by the respondeiit No. 3. The petitioner without giving details as to vvhat is the nature of the School, why the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed this petition, praying that fhe respondents be dlrected to grant benefits of5 Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difficuit to decide the issue involved for vvant of adequate materials with regard to grant of 5 Pay Commission to the employees. ^^ Sahu 4. This Court has already considered arid decided the same issue on 06.02.2007 in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. No. 4108 of2Q05) and other connected matters. 5. It is not necessary to approach this Court directly vvhen the law on a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a representation to the concemed authorities, if so advised, m the light of law settled by this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Supra). 6. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ! 2007 (l)BLJ 265