IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 15TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 25752 of 2010(T) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SAJAN K.B., S/O.K.G.BHASHKARAN, AGED 29, KAYAPPILLY PARAMBU, ELAMAKKARA P.O., KOCHI-26. BY ADV. SRI.BASIL MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REP. BY VICE CHANCELLOR, THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. 688631. 3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THANJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. 688 631 4. GOVT. LAW COLLEGE, THRISSUR, REP. BY PRINCIPAL, GOT. LAW COLLEGE, AYYANTHOL, THRISSUR.688426. R1 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 25752 of 2010 T ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T After obtaining Law Degree from CUSAT, the petitioner joined LLM Course in the fourth respondent College. He completed LLM course and passed the examination as well. His complaint is that his mark list is not issued by the second respondent University. It is with this grievance the writ petition is filed. 2. Standing Counsel for the University submits that normal procedure is that the certificate of the qualifying examination, along with the required fee should be remitted by the student in the College itself and that it is for the Principal of the College to forward the degree certificate and fee to the University to issue the mark list. It is stated that these documents have not been forwarded by the Principal and, therefore, the University has not issued the mark list. Standing Counsel further submits that, in spite of it, if the petitioner remits the required fee and furnish the qualifying degree certificate in the second respondent University, the University will send the mark list to the fourth respondent WPC.25752/10 : 2 : College. Thereupon, the petitioner agrees to comply with the said requirement. 3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the petitioner remits the fee and submits the qualifying certificate to the second respondent University, the University shall forward the LLM mark list of the petitioner to the fourth respondent College. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks