IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50332 of 2008 MUNNA KUMAR YADAV @ CHHOTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.12.2008. For the reasons indicated in the restoration application, Cr. Misc. No. 36295 of 2008 is restored to its original file. Restoration application is, accordingly disposed of and is taken up for admission. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It appears that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of the statement of the co-accused as also his own confessional statement recorded before the police. After investigation police submitted charge sheet under Section 396 of the Penal Code. Counsel further pointed out that others implicated in the manner in which petitioner has been implicated has already been admitted to the privilege of bail. When such submission was raised this Court desired to know the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, then counsel for the petitioner candidly accepted that petitioner is accused in various cases of major offence including Sections 395 and 396 of the Penal Code. Yet counsel desires that the matter be taken up in the next week so that the other orders of this Court by which other co-accused with similar allegation have been admitted to the privilege of bail be considered by this Court. Put up in the next week maintaining its position. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.) - 2 -