1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1102 OF 2007 IN COUNTER CLAIM (ST.) NO.1168 OF 1996 IN SUIT NO.498 OF 1994 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited ..Plaintiffs to the counter claim (oring. Defendant). Vs. Ajit Kapadia ..Defendants to the counter claim (orig. Plaintiff). and Anuradha Ajit Kapadia and others ..Proposed Defendants. WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1263 OF 2007 Ajit Kapadia ..Plaintiff. Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited ..Defendant. and Anuradha Kapadia and others ..Applicants. .... Mr. S.R. Shaikh i/b M/s. Thakordas & Madgavkar for the Plaintiff. Ms. S.I. Shah for the Defendant. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 14th January, 2008. P.C. : With the consent of Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff, the Defendants and the Applicants, both the Chamber Summons are taken on board. The original Plaintiff has expired and the 2 Chamber Summons has been taken out by the respective parties for bringing the legal heirs of the original Plaintiff on the record. Since there is a counter claim, a separate Chamber Summons has been taken out by MTNL. Since neither Chamber Summons has been opposed, Chamber Summons 1263 of 2007 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Chamber Summons 1102 of 2007 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.