WP(C) 1901/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.MADAN B. LOKUR This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking regularizati on of her services as a Grade-IV employee in the office of Respondent No.6 and t o release her pending salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that in so far as regularization is concerned, his client does not appear to be interested in this relief in vie w of the fact that she has been engaged as an Anganwadi Worker. Consequently, this portion of the prayer made by the petitioner is rejec ted. In so far as the question of unpaid salary is concerned, learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not been paid her salary with effect from 20.11 .2006 to 27.6.2007. I find from a reading of paragraph-12 of the writ petition that it is st ated that the petitioner has been working as a Grade-IV employee in the office of Respondent No.6 and she has not received her salary since August, 2007. She h as approached the respondent for payment of her salary post August, 2007. This c learly postulates that the salary prior to August, 2007 has been received by the petitioner. That apart, the claim made by the petitioner for unpaid salary from 20.1 1.2006 to 27.6.2007 is not mentioned in the writ petition. Under the circumstances, there is no merit in the submission of learned counsel. No other relief is claimed by the petitioner. It may be mentioned at this stage that the respondents have, in their af fidavit-in-opposition, stated that the petitioner has been engaged as an Anganwa di Worker since 28th June, 2007, but she had not attended her duties since then. In view of the above facts, there is no merit in the writ petition. Dism issed.