IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH (26TH) DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SRI G.V.SEETHAPATHY Criminal Petition No.9584 of 2010 Between: Smt. Kanthamma & 3 others … Petitioners And: State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Criminal Petition No.9584 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners-1 to A.4 and 2nd respondent-complainant are present. Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri C. Subhodh, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, are also present. 2. Both parties have stated that they have entered into compromise and settled their dispute out side the Court. The 2nd respondent-complainant stated that in pursuance of the compromise, she is withdrawing the complaint filed by her against the petitioners and she is no longer interested in prosecuting the petitioners. She also filed an affidavit to that effect. 3. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties settling the dispute amicably out side the Court, it is considered no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.611 of 2010 of Jeedimetla PS, Ranga Reddy district and it is a fit case to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings against the petitioners in CR.No.611 of 2010 of Jeedimetla PS, Ranga Reddy district. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.611 of 2010 of Jeedimetla PS, Ranga Reddy district are held liable to be quashed and are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of as stated above. ___________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 26.11.2010 bss