IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6721 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.01.2010 Sukhdham Sharma ....Petitioner versus ICICI Bank ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. N.K.Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The writ petition seeks for a direction against the respondent Bank not to take forcible possession of the property without complying with the due proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner also seeks for a direction that the Bank will accept the arrears of further instalments. Although notice has been issued to the respondent, no one has appeared. The relief in the writ petition is only that the possession of the petitioner shall be protected and he cannot be dispossessed except in accordance with law. 2. The petitioner will have such remedy and for any recovery under the contract, the respondent will take appropriate action only Civil Writ Petition No.6721 of 2009 - 2 - through the provisions of the Securitization Act or by any other process admissible by law. 3. Subject to these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 15.01.2010 sanjeev