•^1 p<; ^N IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI9GARH AT BILASPUR Vftit PetiUon No.'^^~'/20Q2 f^ •&C PEimONH^ Bald RaxnJaiswal, S/o Kfidar Prasad^ Aged about 45 year&, R/o Wlage-Sees P.0. Sees PaU, Tehsil- Kota, Districk-Bila»pur« - Veiwis- ^ ftate of ChhattisgaFh/ ThroughSecretaxy, Departanant Of Pandhayat, Mantralaya, Shastxi Chowk, Raipur(CQ) Z Additional Collector, Klaspun 3. Gteam.Pandhayat Sees, Through Chief Exectdive Officer, Tehsil- Kota, Distt. Bilaspur. .^ •,:'?€£-1" '^' >^*': i..^" .^ ^•<^ ^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. L____. XI-HC-22 ^n^T^r 'f^ti^sn^? X-T7I1^'^1 ^-N '3"^ ^^Kri^, ^Tii^t^ [®j<vji^y ^iwrr^RT^_u..(::...!.ll.€ "^ 200 ^^s?" 3??^TI^?TW^T[ 29.08.2003 Shri Prashant Jaiswal, petitioner. State by Shri Gautami with Shn S.P.Bargaiya, Govt. Heard. with Shri Asgar Ali counsel for the Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General hdvocate. In view of the tiinited nfeture a direction to the appellaa.^ dispose of the appeal withia 4 will be seryred m keepmg fhisj pi'aycr of couiiscl for the pc|dti< State Coiuiscl thtis pctition stage. AdBiittedly, against fh^ agaiast the petitioner a Additional Collector/ respond| Panchayat Raj Adhiaiyam 19R3. the m.otion of no-confiden<t* c^i^i^i<fl<i ^PT^f"? fe^ 'tf^$R ^3?P^H3?]^T of the prayer m.ade which is for authority Le. respondent no,2 to stipulated period, no useful purpose petition pending, Accordmgly on fhe ioner aiid wifli fhc consent of thc [s fiiially disposcd of at thc niotion passiag of a no-coir&dence inotion te has been raised before tlie di^put :nt no.2 under section 21(4) of the luitially aii iatertai order staying e was passed on 19.6.2002 but subsequently on 23.7.2002 l|ie said order was vacated. It is the [^^fm XI-HC-22 ^.-.^toUU^Si^te^.^^s^Aa^ 's^ ^N s<n^, ^TQw^^ 1^<?swi< 31T^?T ^^K 'W^^IT^HSeh '^ 200 •1^^' sn^T^i R4J?b 3^[ ^H*tch ^rf^f \y^- '^l' ,a^ 3ii^r'^FF^: ^rfN w^.i subniission of learaed counsel fo: au1|hority steps are beiag taken by the Accordiagly, the prayer is for a dir^c 110,2 to dispose oftlie dispute witli In the above view of the niattbr by directing respondent no.2 to tn| early date after affordmg an oppor^unity before Tiim preferably witih.in a pej receipt/comiiiunication of this ord^ order, fhe proceeduigs wUl not b^ contestuig partics. It is Biadc clca| aiiy opiaion ou thc inerits of thcj which will be decided by the authc accordance w^ifh low. <^114$d^H HlH^f^'fe^ <fa^K* ^•3?N^^¥r fhe petitioner that fhereafter no to dispose of the dispzite. ?tion to the autlionty/ respondent SL stipulated period. sr, fhis writ petition is disposed of and dispose of fhe dispute at an of hearing to all the parties ^iod of 60 days froni ftie date of ;r, However, to. the garb of this completed wifhout notice to the that the Court is not expressiag pctitioncr9s claiai or contention, hority on its own m.erits and in Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [^^3^ ^