IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25323 of 2010 PRAHLAD BHAGAT --------------------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.26775 of 2010 1. INDRADEO THAKUR 2. INDRADEO PRASAD ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was firing in the village due to which the deceased and petitioner Prahlad Bhagat received fire arm injury. Prahlad Bhagat survived. According to learned counsel, Prahlad Bhagat gave an statement about the incident that the extremists came, searched his nephew, finding him absent, shot firing which only hit three persons including the deceased and petitioner Prahlad Bhagat. In the instant case, there is allegation against the petitioners along with other named accused persons about the shot firing, resulting into death of both the deceased. Really, it was an extremist activity or extremists like such activity. Witnesses have stated that the mob including the petitioners 2 not only shot firing rather looted away household articles. So it can be said that the act of mob was of extremists who indulged in such activity of which petitioners were members, are not entitled for liberal view in anticipation of their arrest. Thus, considering the nature of allegation, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)