IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6047/2010 alongwith CWPs No.6048 and 6049 of 2010 Decided on: 7. 10.2010. 1. CWP No. 6047/2010 Raj Kumari. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ... Respondents. 2. CWP No. 6048/2010 Bal Krishan Kashyap. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ... Respondents. 3. CWP No. 6049/2010 Basanti Raini. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ... Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate.(in all the petitions. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. (in all the petitions). Justice Rajiv Sharma (oral) Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, the same are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by a common judgment. 2. Petitioners are claiming benefits of ad hoc service rendered by them for the purpose of pay fixation and pensionary Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 benefits etc. The issue raised in these petitions is covered by the judgments rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 7712 of 2008 decided on 19.5.2009, titled as Paras Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and LPA No. 36/2010 decided on 15.7.2010, titled as Sita Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. 3. Consequently, all the petitions are disposed of with directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in view of the principles laid down in above noted judgments within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copies of this judgment by the petitioners. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge. 7.10. 2010. *awasthi*