WGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH ' Coram : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, G.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. I W.P.{PIL) No. 585 of 2008 PEITITIONER Amol malusare,~ Block No.184—G, Risali Sector, Bhilai Nagar, Poiice Station — Nevai Police Station, Tah. Burg, Distt. Burg, Post Office i: Risali Post Office, Pin: 491006. Versus REsPONDENTS 1‘ The Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg, State-Chhattisgarh India 2 The Municipal Corporation Durg, Distt. Durg, State Chhattisgarh, India ~3- The Mayor-in-councii, Municipal Corporation Durg, Distt. Durg. State~Chhattisgarh, lndia. 4. The Mayor Durg Municipal Corporation Burg, Dislt. Durg, State-Chhattisgarh, India 5. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Durg, Distt. Durg, State-Chhattlsgarh, lndia 6'‘ The Chief Executive Officer, Town and Country ' Development Authority, Distt. urg, State- ChhattiSgarh’, lndia. Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India Present: Petitioner in person. Shri Kishore Bhaduri; learned Additional Advocat General, for the State/ respondent No.1. ORDER (25m February, 2908) @ D \ @ The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, c.J. Heard on admission. 2. Petitioner — Amol Maiusare has filed this writ petition styled. . as ‘Public interest Litigation’ for appropriate action against respondents No. 2 to 6 for the alleged. irregularities! illegalities said to have been committed by them. 3. For ascertaining the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner against respondents No. 2 to 6 a ‘fact finding enquiry’ would be necessary. Such a 'fact finding enquiry’ can be better conducted by the Lokayukt, who has an independent investigation wing. 4. in this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that it would be appropriate for the petitioner to approach the Lokayukt for redressai of the grievances projected in the writ petition‘ subbu 5. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposedof, Sd/- i a sd/. x‘»; ‘ Sunil Kumar Sinha cHIEF JUSTICE Judge