In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 14727 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 14, 2006 Shakuntla Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The grievance made by the petitioner is that she has been transferred against the transfer policy of the year 2006-2007 (P-2). In that regard no representation has been made to respondent No. 2 bringing to his notice the violation of the transfer policy. Accordingly, we allow withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation in this regard within two weeks by bringing to the notice of respondent No. 2 various violations of the transfer policy, under Registered A.D. cover, then respondent No. 2 shall look into the same and pass a speaking order within four weeks of its receipt. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) CWP No. 14727 of 2006 September 14, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor 2