Cr.Revision No. 174 of 2011 19.10.2011 Present: Mr. R.L.Chaudhary, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. J.S.Rana, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Cr.M.P.No.812 of 2011 and Cr.Revision No. 174 of 2011. This is an application jointly filed by petitioner and respondent No.1. It has been stated that the revision has been compromised between petitioner and respondent No.1. It has been stated that the application has been signed by petitioner as well as respondent No.1 and their respective counsel. The application is supported by the affidavits of petitioner as well as respondent No.1. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 has stated that respondent No.1 has already received ` 40,000/- out of ` 80,000/- compensation awarded by learned trial Magistrate in the judgment dated 4.11.2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the terms settled between the parties, respondent No.1 shall be entitled to receive the amount of `.40,000/- deposited by petitioner in the lower Appellate Court. It has been stated by learned counsel for respondent No.1 that since the matter has been settled and compounded between the parties, therefore, he has no objection if the conviction and sentence of the petitioner awarded by the trial Court and upheld by the lower Appellate Court are set- aside. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a bank draft of ` 6,000/-, 15% of the cheque amount has already been submitted by the petitioner in the Registry along with the application which is likely to be encashed in due course. - 2 - 2. I have gone through the application and I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and compounded between the parties. In these circumstances, the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 4.11.2010 passed by the trial Court and upheld by the Sessions Judge, Kullu on 16.7.2011 are set-aside. The petitioner is acquitted of the accusation. The amount of ` 40,000/- deposited by petitioner in the lower Appellate Court shall be paid to respondent No.1 on his filing appropriate application in the said Court. The amount of `.6,000/- deposited by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court shall be remitted to H.P. High Court Legal Services Committee in terms of Damodar S. Prabhu versus Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663. The application and petition are disposed of. 3. Interim order dated 12.9.2011 passed in Cr.M.P.No. 688 of 2011 is vacated and application is disposed of in view of disposal of the main petition. October 19, 2011 ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.