IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.25676 of 2011 Date of decision:- 03.10.2011 Bhoop Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr. Anil Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This is a petition for regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 241 dated 09.06.2011 under Sections 307, 120-B, 34 IPC and 135-A of R.P. Act registered at Police Station Sadar Bhiwani, District Bhiwani. On 25.08.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel states that the petitioners have been in custody since 09.06.2011 and the allegation is that on his exhortation the gunman of petitioner No.1 shot complainant just near the elbow and the complainant has since been discharged. As per learned counsel the occurrence took place because despite the boycott of all the combined upper castes of the village, petitioner No.1 being Scheduled caste had the courage to stand for election.” Apart from that learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that even the alleged victim has since been discharged from CRM-M No.25676 of 2011 2 hospital and no lasting damages have been caused to him. Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions from ASI, Satyawan has accepted these factual assertions. In this view of the matter, without commenting on merits, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. (AJAY TEWARI) 03.10.2011 JUDGE reena