1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4650 of 2009 ( Waman Sakharam Chide -: versus :- Milind Madhukar Deshpande ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. N.N. Motghare, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 6, 2010. 1. Heard finally. 2. The trial Court did not grant temporary injunction either to plaintiff or defendant. Lower Appellate Court, however, finds that there was mistake in recording survey numbers and hence, the respondent/plaintiff to be in possession of new Survey No.375 and present petitioner/defendant to be in possession of Survey No. 374. It, therefore, granted temporary injunction to respondent/plaintiff. This order dated 15-10-2008 is challenged in this petition before this Court on 10-9-2009. 3. Today during hearing the learned Advocate for petitioner states that by taking police aid and under purported reasons of protecting possession, the respondent/plaintiff has dispossessed petitioner/defendant. 2 4. In this situation, it will not be proper for this Court to express itself about the alleged errors in recording survey numbers during consolidation proceedings. The suit as filed is of the year 2007, hence as requested proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No.54/2007 are expedited. The petitioner/defendant as also the respondent/plaintiff to file affidavit before the trial Court by 30th April, 2010 that they shall co-operate with it in expeditious disposal of civil suit. If such affidavits are received, the trial Court shall proceed further and shall decide the suit as early as possible or in any case before 31st August, 2010. 5. With this directions, present Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to the costs. JUDGE adgokar