Tc^ ?qT?n^T, t$T{1^<|<o, fs|<^l-M^< W^v\\ *^|cb """""""""""""""""""""""" """"^ 200 31T^T Tra^ (^clf^^) v^ 3^r^?T ^icb ^T^T^TT^T ^RW '^TTW^H^TJ^T HIGH COURT OF CH S.B. HON'BLE MR. JU M.C.C. N0. 210 OF 2006 APPL1CANT B'QN-APPLICANTS "yERSU 7.12.2007 Mr. Aaand Kiimar Tiwa^ Dr. N.K. ShuMa, Sr. A4 for the non--applicants. Heard on IA.No.2, a^ record. Npt opposed. The appUcation is allow| CT)l^<>l<fl'1 'RR^f ^* 'f^st <F3l^l< ^" 3TRPT 37T^T ATTI8GARHATNLA8PUR .TICE DHIRENDRA MISHRA M/ s Shyamlal Agra¥7al^ Through : Shyam Lal Agrawal, S/o Shri R.K. Agrawal, Aged about 55 years, Prop Presentiy residing at : Nehru Nagar, Azueri Road, Bilaspiir (CG) Chairm.an-cuxn-Managm.g Director.South Eastern CoaJfields Liuilted, Seepat Road, PO ; SEC.L, Bilaspur(CG) The General Maiiager (Clvil) Sozith Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Seepat Road, PO : SECL, BUaspur (C.G1 The Chief General Manager, South Easteni Coal&elds Lioiited, Sohagpur Area, PO; Dhaapuri CoUy, Distt. : Shalidol (MP) [, counsel for the appUcaat. ocatewifh Ms. Ritu Mishra. counsel •Ucation for taldiig documents on d. Docum.ents ai'c taken 011 record. ^y^ ^^f ^yil^, rFsRT^TR —FS/59— 8/2007 —30,000. ^'TI^T.'SFT f<^Jcb WT ^n^r $h^iob ^KV 7S3[ -qi^j^^, ^•y^KS, is|<?i>l^^< ^ ^l^dl (h^lcb "^ 200 Wt?T ^(^K (4c|f^<sj<{^) ^RTTW^rf^T ^qn^T With the coiisent of the j?arties, the m.atter is heaind fiiiaUy. The appllcant by fhis Arbitration aiid Conciliation for appointaient of sole arbj arbitration agreemeat dated beUvcea tiic parties for execul Black Toppmg of approach Dhaapuri Open Cast Miiie (DC was issued on 20th Februa^y Rs.40,86,402/-. There was could not be coHipleted withinj as PCT the contract agreemei} the non-applicaiits. A clai^n prqparation of final bitls difference ui fhe rate ofwork, tlie security dcposit etc. How< tiic above claiois reinaiaed ul the appUcaat vlde his notice ^ of Rs.l 1,00,000/- under warit appUcants to appoiiit sole aijl arising out of the arbiteationj agreem.eiit, which reads as ur{< "9. Arbitration : All arismg betweeti the p& cbl^f<rt^1v1 'RP^ff ^* 'feT^t <R?l^l< ^ 3TRPT ^TT^T ^etition under Section 11(6) of the ^ct (for breyity the Actl has prayed Itrator ^yith the averment fhat aa 10th Februarv 1991 was eatered in.to ^on of the work of Streiigthening and ['oad from check post to quarry at |^CM) aiid accorduigly, the work order 1991. Value of fh-e work was lelay iii execution of the work as it the stipulated period of four monfhs [t aiid tlie delay was attributable to was made by the applicaat for jiid paynient towards extra work, escalatlon charges and for refund of ;ver, his request for payinent agaitist ^ireplied aiid ui tliese circum.staiices [ated 12th August 2003 raised a claim >us heads and called upon the non- bitrator for adjudicatiag the dispute agreement as per Clause ~ 9 of the der: di^putes or differeiice whatsoever rties out of or rdatmg to the ;H%€^^NW ^u(t0^, -tl^^i^licj —FS/59— 8/2007 —30,000. TS^T ^W!r^5^, ^>^\W[<o, (s)01^^< *41*<dl ^b^lch' -^ 200 sti^yr TRRT (Tjarf^si^T) ^^r^ R^icb ^T^TT^T 5b^licb ^TTW^TT 3T8^T 3 coiistruction ineaning 01} contract or breach ther< arbitrator appoiated Coat&elds Ltd. aiid the fiiial and binding on arbitrator inay frora tim| fhe parues anlarge fhe the award. The arbiti'al accordance with the Arbj [d operation or effected of tliis of shall be settled by a sole ^ CMD of South Eastern a^vard or arbitrator shaU be ^he parties concerned. The i|e to time with the consent of fc}m.e for m.akmg aad pubUsiimg |tion proceeditigs shall be ia 3]jtrationAct, 1940." Siace the non-appUc^ arbitorator wifhiii th.e stipula applicati.cn for appointoient of ^its have failed to appoint sole ted period of 30 days, the instant Isole arbitrator has beea filed. The non-appUcaiits iii petition on three grounds tha1 law of Um.itation, fhat tlie app] his conduct aad thit'dly, tha^ uiiregistered partiiCTship &3 Section 69 of tlie Partnershib applicaiit has filed the certifici At this juncture, learne| not press tiie ground ofwaivet so far as the ground of lmiit4l considered bv the leai'n^ procecdmgs. tllieu' ^l^^ll 'HTTOf ^ fe^t <p3l^|< ^T ^tRP=T 3T[^T reply have xaainly contested this the iastaat appUcation is barred by ^aiit lias waived his claim., if aiiy, by the applicatioii at the instance of is not maintahiable in. view of ? Act. However, subseciuently the te of registration ofthe firin. counsel for the non-appMcant does of claim. However, he snbmits that is concCTned, fhe same niay be it4.tion d arbitrator duriiig ai'bitt'ation After going through the| appUcation, tlie documents amiexed witli tlie application aad the r^ply ofthe non-applicaiits ffled before ^fffC^ ^^f g^m^r, <t^^i^jjcj —ps/59— 8/2007 —30,ooo. 37T^T ?FT f<Tli<sb TT^T •3TT^T $ti^icn 3^T;?TPTT^T, ^Tn'y<l<S,fc)<7'iW^< ^l^dl *Nleb •^ 200 3^?r xnr^ (4^^<yT) ^<TTW Tlf^T 3TI^T tlie Distiict Judge as also that a case for appointmer Court has the fbefore tliis Court, tliis Court is satisfied lt of sole arbitrator is xnade out aiid fhis territorial ju^isdictiou to entertaiii tlus application. So fai' as objection appMcatiou is barred by 14w open to the non-applicant^ learned arbitorator, who m.iiv pleadiags, docunieiits and| pai'ties ia this regard. Iii view of above, th| appouitaient of sole ai'bitr4 tmlie However, at the parties to ttie proceedings| Mi\ Justice K.L. Shrivasltava appouited as the sole I herebv, therefor< Slirivastava (Reth'ed), Hig4 to his consent. The Honf conditions and rem.unerations Registry to uitimLat| (Retii'ed) about liis appoit^tineiit tlie papers alongwith addte$ chi^(<n<i1Ti ^i^^* ^r^^ <pii^i< '^^tRpT'yn^T of fhe non--appUcaats fhat fhe instaiit of Imiitation is concerned, it shall be to raise tlus ground before the Court of iv decide the sam.e after consideriiig the the evidence adduced by the respective e appUcation is aUowed aiid a case for itor is held to be m.ade out. arbitlrator of hearuig it was subm.itted by the that they have no objection if Hon5ble (Retired), Hieh Court of M.P. is to adjudicate thc disputes. ;, appomt Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.L. Court of M.P. as sole arbitrator, subject ble arbitrator m.av settle his tei'm.s aiid Hon?ble Mr. Justice K.L. Stuivastava as sole arbiteator and to sead atl esses oftheparties. ^n^r ??T Rrii<=b TT^TT 'SIT^T 5FHRT h< ^EET ?3Tpn^r, ?$Tfl^<i(s, (ct<?'>w^< ^W^\{ 5h^l<sh .^2..C..-C...^./..<?/d.^.. -^ 200 3^?r tnra? (4<i<^<t^) '^TTW^f^T 3TT^T Parties are also K.L. Shrivastava (Re&ed),) Kumar Shi'ivastava, Distri^t submit papers and take pat <=hi^f<n<fli *ii<4<?il* ^f.f^^l <Hii^i< '5(T ^tRm 37T^T dir^ctecl to approach Hon^le Mi\ Justice High Court of M.P. C/o Mr. Arvmd & Sessions Judge, Bilaspur (CG) aad |'t in the arbitratioii proceediags. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge