1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8502 OF 2009 Ramalingam Narayan Padiachi .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.M.P.Vashi i/b M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Patne A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned A.G.P. at the outset invited my attention to section 30 of the Maharashtra Foodgrains Rationing (Second) Order, 1966, and submits that there is a revision provided against the order impugned in the present writ petition. Having confronted with this Mr.Vashi, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file revision before the State Government. He further seeks direction to the concerned Minister/Deputy Secretary to the Government, to dispose of his revision within timeframe. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: (a) The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 2 (b) Liberty to the petitioner to file a revision challenging the order dated 24.9.2009 impugned in the present writ petition within a period of two weeks from today. If such a revision is filed by the petitioner the concerned Minister/Deputy Secretary to the Government designated by the State Government shall decide the same on merits as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order. The Minister/Deputy Secretary to the Government shall entertain the revision application without entering into the issue of limitation. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)