IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.360 of 2011 1. BAHADUR MUKHIYA SON OF BAHUR MUKHIYA 2. UMESH MUKHIYA SON OF BAHADUR MUKHIYA 3. DINESH MUKHIYA SON OF BAHADUR MUKHIYA 4. ABDUL KAIYUM @ SHEIKH KAIYUM SON OF SHEIKH ALI ALL R/O VILLAGE- JHARA, P.S.- MAHISHI, DISTRICT- SAHARSA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 04/02/2011 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were admitted to bail vide order dated 10.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40558 of 2010 but due to inadvertence in the cause title of the petition name of the father of petitioner no.4 namely, Abdul Kaiym @ Sheikh Kaiym has wrongly been typed as “Sheikh Ali” in place of “Late Sheikh Mohammad”. Considering the above facts, the order dated 10.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40558 of 2010 is modified to the extent that name of the father of petitioner no. 4 shall be read as “Late Sheikh Mohammad” in place of “Sheikh Ali”. Other terms and condition will remain same. Accordingly, this modification application is allowed to the aforesaid extent. Let this order be communicated to the Court 2 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Mahisi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2007 on the cost deposited by the petitioner avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)