1 w1075.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1075 OF 2011 Common Man’s Welfare Association .. Petitioners. v/s Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Anr. .. Respondents. Ms.Shabana Sothe for the petitioners. Ms.Priti Purandare for respondent no.1. Mr.J.S.Saluja AGP for respondent no.2. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ DATED : 8TH JUNE 2011 P.C.: 1. Not on board. Mentioned. 2. By this petition the petitioners’ claims that though they are hutmen dwellers in Dharavi and they are protected by the government resolution at Exhibit-A and that they are entitled to be accomodated in Dharavi area itself the corporation is not competent to order their relocation somewhere else. It appears that the corporation had issued notice for demolition of the structures occupied by the petitioners and, therefore, the petitioners had filed Writ Petition (Lodging) No.565 of 2011. That petition has been disposed of by the Division Bench of this court by order dated 20th March, 2011. It appears that the rights to 2 w1075.11 which the petitioners are entitled according to the aforesaid documents at Exhibit-A could have been raised by the petitioners in that writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated before us that those questions were not raised in the writ petition. In our opinion as those grounds could have been raised in that writ petition and were not raised, in view of the settled law those grounds will be deemed to be abandoned by the petitioners. The petitioners cannot, therefore, raise those grounds in this writ petition. The petition, therefore, cannot be entertained hence it is rejected. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J)