1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.395 OF 2008 (Kamalkumar Shrawan Bhirad vs. The Divisional Commissioner and another) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE , JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 7, 2008 Heard Shri Badar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Deopujari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. The criminal writ petiiton is filed for extension of period of parole. Shri Badar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that petitioner was released on parole by the competent Authority vide order dated 14.8.2007 for a period of 30 days. It is submitted that petitioner made an application before the competent Authority for extension of period of parole. However, the said application came to be rejected by the competent Authority vide order dated 24.10.2007 and hence, the petitioner has filed this petition. It is brought to the notice of this Court 2 that the petitioner has already surrendered before the Jail Authorities. In that view of the matter, cause of action in the criminal writ petition no more survives. The criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE khj