c StngleBench . ^ • 1 00 IN THE HONSLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSI No.^f ^4 /2011 PETITIONERS: '" Dr. Medani Prasad Rathore (Dr. M. P. Rathore) S/o Late D. P. Rathore aged about 53 years, R/o Plot No.798, Niharika Road, Kosabari, Korba, Tahsil & District: Korba, Chhattisgarh. Presently posted as fhe Medical Officer, District Hospital, Korba, District: Korba, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 01. <' ^ 02. ^y.^v' ft /\ ^y'i.-"""^ -Gl" f >t" State of Chhattisgarh through: The Secretary, Departnient of Health & Family Wetfare, Dau Kalyaa Singh Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Du'ector, Health Services, Directorate of Health Services, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ••"' / ^ .../ ^lvnM'\.^ .04 .^ ..•••(^PKJ..--''' ^4y.x, ^ 03. Collector, CoUectorate, Korba, C.G. 05. Civil Surgeon -cuin- Chief Hospital Superintendent, District Hospital, Korba, Tahsil 85 District: Korba, Chhattisgarh. Dr. Orakar Singh Kanwar, Medical Officer, F>rimary Health Centre, Bade Gudara, Dist: Dantewada through: Director, Health Services, Directorate of Health Semces, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^.&sf-.. WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COURTOF CHHATT13GARH ; BILASPUR \S\^YT S^TITtr^^ s~^,\ Mf^ ^^^^1 fs^ ^n'i-i <fur;j i ?"£:s i l ;<i^j~«i i0," i^\»^.o io£-r 'u^r" ^.u : i PE'iTICNER Cr. Medsni Prsssd RsthcfS ^ ^/^i.yir^l ; v Oi' teUte o5:cks":;r^h^n^MT'<; c;-.-^-- /^ r^ni-t/.s-A^^.-sFk j?- r""-^^-,?-- 3-\i-Or"\-ifi^iut'L.i^ i <3 <wile3ic; u: '^/-J ii •'=riUJS?:-;<riE :;' Ct •^fl.i.ieiio (Writ Peiition ursder Aitiole 225 cfthe Consctution of 'ndia) Sinciie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Aaniholri. J. Prsssnt > Shri Rsl Ksmsl Sinph, Advocsts for ths ustitlQn'sr, ls'H;i M.run ^>£Q, ^ovsmmspi novocsis Torins ssisxs. f^.'ST^f^-S .'f^OAI \ '•awif^i-i'si-i°\ \\^J\^-\'»i (1 S3SSQCI OH tiilS i s £3Sy O? UCtODSFj A.m 1 ) ch^Hsnri-o :" 4'hs^ n^"i'Tin:k~i ^ tn th-^ ^^^r Hi^'t^s^ vT Aun^s'i ^fl'1'1 lAnnexurs P-4), passed bythe resDondent No.1. whereby, 'ihe oetiiioner 'TSS DS'Sfi ;fS.RST'3'rSO TrGiH UiSinCT ^OSplIQI KQfD'S IQ LriSIHCT flOSpsTSi Narsvanpur, on aa'r'inisirative grounds. 1 fe petitioner also cnallenses IHB ordsr dstsd 29 S8Dtsmb©r,2011 fAnnsxurs P-2;. ossssd bv ths respondent No.4, by wh'ch Ihe petitioner reiieved from the present placs of posting, in pufsuance of the order daied 27l"AuyuSt, 201 1. The petit'oner ohsiienges the jmpugned ordsr oniy on Ihe ground ihat since he made a comoiainl on 27'" june. 2011 to the Coiiector bv raisina some irreguisrities in raspect of the scheme of "Janani Suraksha Yojana" Si "Matri-Shishu Kaiyan Yolana", the petRioner has been trsnsferred. Furihsr, contenilon of the petitioner ss that he is suffering froi"! ssvere hea'th problsrri a"d the imougned order has been passed oniy to accommodate the resaondent No.o without anv adm'nistraiive ?-»i*—i.T?4':tj-^y^:/-*?-n-r^ +-*' ^.T ? ?<^» ^^^ c**^,^ '^^ ^-^,/^l^/~h^na-. .^-^—?=<Ti^>."- °r-t T ^/"'i /^^fp^'^-^4'^'^/^S't 5?. sxj£isrtcv. .] ns pgiiisongr ^s s ciusiiDgo fnsoiUci;; ijiuyci iH l^ifc:; ^PisiyViLSi Ot Gynsscolc-yy dspsrtmsnt c'f ths Dis7r;ct Hospltsl yvho csn tsN;e csrs Qt tns "Janani Suraksha Yojana" & "SVIatri-Shishu Kaiyan Yojana" run by ths Chhanisaam Government for 'lhe welfare o? the moiher and the cni;c;,, Tnus< 7ns in^pugnsa xrsnsasr is DSG- Apart from this. there is "o olher admissibie iegai uround such as ?73sisir;efs. Sack of comoetence of the officer, who hss passed tbe transfer ordsr sn'd violstiorj of sistutorv rul'ss snd rsLiulsttons ^;^AT3st^& •..•^"""^ ~^~s^.\ ^-1 i H6 OOstTSniiO;'] O? iSSfnSu COLinSSs 3DO£3:TIHQTO!T InS DSTiIIQHSf IS tiiSl THS ^TipUgHSO OfGSf HSS QBSH pSSSSQ oui QI msiice, ss »coniipiSiHT wss :TiS.QS TQ TH© UOIISGIQf. 1 nus, TH© -sisis ^ovsmmsrii, nss psssso Tns order transferring the petitioner from fne present ptace of posting to Districl Hospita' Naravanour. Except, the seireame stateniem, no materisi has been produced to indicate that ihere wss snv co-relation r-^i'-^t?^*^ ^^.^*—>^"^'^' v'^y-^/Y ^'i^lj^- 1 V*1^-:?^\ ?'.--^^ 3^.^^-'^ T?fc<-J^ r^f='~.--^ 7- ^S5~/~3rf—^.P- ?rt;/%?-"-'-"i^ ^.^. J ^yt/^. C"-/-c4,-*~^ w'zn ins compisiiii ano^ns impugnec; if8nSTQf orci©rp^sssa DV ins toiais Qovernmen'i. Thus, 'ine contention of exercise of maiafide aRainst the pevlttoner is vsgue and unfounded, and ss such, the same is rejeGted. Bs that as it mav. it Is a frite iaw that trarisfer/Dostino is an incidence of S&P/1C6, ! n8 UOUH SHOUiO ^OT inisFisrs wn?i ITI©ifsnsTsnposiinci QfGsr unisss thsre is inalice, infringsment of slatutory rules and reguialions. !n 7hs case on hand. ihe oe'iitioner has fai'ed to estabiish anv of the y^:= -^^ J'^JT^ ?^1^/^'^ ? ?^i^^ Tv^ f^-f~r T/^ f^t /-s !/^^^ ?. 7^^^'7*jS ^~S'r T^1 ^- y.;0i yyrdi.yu ^i'uuHuy. ] i^ s; ^piuy^^ liiay UCT pL?yiyu 'd.uyyyisy;'^ yi, Ui5? instsnce ot ine emp'over in DUO!IC interesi aiia aaministraiive exigency. j-unher, " is for the Govemment to post anolher pereon if any vacancy aris&s on accounl uf transferyposting of an empioyee. Thus, the impugned order warrsnte no intenarence. (See E.P.Royappa v. State of Tsm!i 1'^auu and anQthor. Shiini Boss (Mrs.} snd othsr3 v. StatB of BihBf & anoiher. State of M.P. and snothsr v. S.S.Kouiv and others^, Mohd Masood Ahmad v. Statff of 'J.P. Sc O'thers" Chief Commercial Manager, Soath OB^trsi Raiiwav. •Sscund^rsbsd & Qths.rs v. G. Ratnsni &. Ot.hQ.^ and Aii'posis Aisthonty ofindsa 'v'. RajeevRatan Panc-ey & Others). ADDiv'na the weil-ssttled DrinciD'ss of tew io the facts of the case on hand gnd fcr the reasons mentioned hereinabove; thsre is no merit in ^ Accordina'v. the writ oetition is dismisssd. ••/-n.^'.s'. /' <"/^^"- ";""". { ; SS'U j O ois^'i^? z.lu 4 "-^-^p-7\ Q C;^'/^ "^H i i^ Ol^/\^ i 'JT-' 5."?007'i8SCC212 Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHOW Judge