IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 3618 of 2011. Reserved on: 22.07.2011. Decided on: 01.08.2011. ___________________________________________ Radha Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. None for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge: Petitioner was appointed as J.B.T. Teacher at Government Primary School, Marhuta (Chachiot-I) with effect from 16th February, 2005 to 8th February, 2007. Thereafter, she was transferred to Government Primary School, Kandha (Chachiot-II) on 8th February, 2007. The distance between these two schools is within the radius of 8 Kms. The petitioner was transferred from Government Primary School, 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - Kandha to Government Primary School Bagsaid on 30th April, 2011. She did not join her duties pursuant to transfer order dated 30th April, 2011 and in the meantime she was transferred to Government Primary School, Burna (Seraj-II) on 12th May, 2011. 2. Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously argued that the petitioner has been transferred to accommodate respondent No.5. According to him, respondent No.5 has always remained posted within the radius of 10 to 12 Kms. 3. According to Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General since the petitioner has remained posted within the radius of 8 Kms. since her initial appointment, there is no illegality in her transfer order dated 12th May, 2011. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the pleadings carefully. 5. Petitioner has remained posted within the radius of 8 Kms. since her initial appointment. The distance between Government Primary School, Kandha and Government Primary School, Marhuta is within the radius of 8 Kms. The petitioner has never joined her duties pursuant to her transfer order, dated 30th April, 2011. She has now been transferred to Government Primary School, Baruna (Seraj-II) on 12th May, 2011. The transfer policy is not statutory in nature. The - 3 - transfer orders can only be assailed on the limited ground if there is any malafide alleged against a particular person or the petitioner has been discriminated against. In the instant case, since the petitioner has remained posted within the radius of 8 Kms. since her initial appointment, there is no illegality in transfer order dated 12th May, 2011 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government Primary School, Kandha (Chachiot-II) to Government Primary School, Burna (Seraj-II). The transfer of the petitioner is a routine order and there is no merit in the contention of Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar that the same has been issued to accommodate the private respondent. The Court has to see the stay of the petitioner in and around a particular place and not of the respondent. 6. It is for the employer to decide where a particular incumbent is to be posted. The only criteria, which is required to be taken into consideration, is that the transfer order must be passed judiciously. 7. Accordingly, in view of the observations and discussions made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 01, 2011(sck).