IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3014 of 2011 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Roy, S/o Sri Dineshwar Roy, resident of Village- Narayanpur, P.O. Derhpura, P.S. Mahnar, District-Vaishali .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Director, Human Resources Development Department (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 6. The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Bihar 7. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Bihar 8. The Finance Officer, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Bihar 9. The Principal, Purvottar Railway College (P.R. College), Sonepur, Saran (Chapra) 10. Krishna Gopal Singh, S/o Sri Surendra Nath Singh, resident of village Meena Bazar Sonepur, P.O. Sonepur, P.S. Sonepur, District-Saran (Chapra) 11. Ravindra Singh, S/o Naga Singh, resident of village-Gheghta, P.O. Rahimpur, P.S. Sonepur, District- Saran (Chapra) 12. Ram Naresh Sharma, S/o Late Chandradeep Singh, resident of Village Sabalpur Babhantoli, P.O. Sabalpur Babhantoli Via Sonepur, P.S. Sonepur, District-Saran (Chapra) .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Pankaj For the State : Mr. Krishna Chandra, AC to AG For the University : Mr. Shivendra Kishore. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 2 28-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the State and for the Jai Prakash University. 2 The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction upon the respondents to consider and approve the post on which the petitioner is working in the concerned college as financially aided post as has been granted to the allegedly similarly situated employees by memo no. 2380 dated 5.12.2008 issued by the Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the authorities are directed to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with a copy of this order before the competent authority of the State within a period of four weeks from today and the same shall be considered and disposed of within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the same by a speaking order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. S.Pandey/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)