IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15005 of 2008 1. NAGENDRA RAI 2. BISHWANATH RAI, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – MAHUA SINGHRAM, P.S. MAHUA, DISTRICT – VAISHALI …….. PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATI RAJ, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM COLLECTOR, VAISHALI 3. ZILA PARISHAD THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CUM D.D.C. VAISHALI 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CUM D.D.C. VAISHALI 5. THE DISTRICT ENGINEER, ZILA PARISHAD, VAISHALI ….. RESPONDETS ----------- For the petitioners: Mr. Sunil Kumar Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocates For the respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. M.D. Singh, JC to GP XVI For the respondent nos. 3 to 5 : Mr. Shrinandan Prasad Singh, Mr. Ashok Kumar No.1 --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 23rd October, 2008 After having heard the counsel for the petitioners, we are satisfied that no case for invocation of writ jurisdiction is made out in the present case. In the writ petition, described as public interest litigation, the petitioners seek to impugn the order dated 5th September, 2008, whereby the District Engineer, Vaishali has been asked to enquire with regard to encroachment over the land bearing Khesra no.2558 Mahua Pakari road (Khata no.750). 2. We fail to understand what grievance anyone could have, if such an inquiry is made by the District Engineer, Vaishali. 2 3. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/-