IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE^TLBLLASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. 5~2«3 / 20ofe fiSnois ssona OisW^ T^:;,.' PETITIONER 0\ y .^v Vinod Kumar Patel S/o Late Shri Vimal .. Kumar Patel, aged about 25 years, ^DV^.-t\^" ,..-" R/o- Maszid Road, Champa, Distt- ^^W^""' ^' JanJgir- Champa (C.G). ..?»'-•'" VERSUS -^-^?-- *%;SPQNDENTS ^^t^ --,:.-=-^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Excise SB sales tax, Department D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.) o I'^.A^' <<§•> District Excise ofRcer Excise department, Bilaspur '^.'^'.'^ -'''Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ,t^y^^SP,«^. Commissioner, SI^A'^ rf^cS^xclse <iePartment, Bilaspur ^trDistt. Bilaspiir (C.G.) 4. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: Secretary, Excise Department, Vallabh ^ Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 5. Union of India Through:Secretary Department of Personal public grievance and personnel third Hoor loknayak bhawan ,khan market, New Delhi WRIT PETITION U/A 226/ 227 OF THE CQNST!TUTIQN_QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION ORDER TQ DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER XI-HC-22 'TEg'^(FIRTO, dTfl'y'l<». MMI'Hy •II^WTWWb^..1^}.L.^^~-S-Q^ r^'""""""""""""""""""^ •fe^sr' 31^[q? R'li.'* sn^r skt| zlf?n "/•• . >v- 3D^?r^giw ^)ft?( 'pQeH^K^ f- >-/^ 2-2-2006 Shri Sanjay Agrawal, counsel fo Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy. G|ovt copy. Heard. • . Learned counsei for the pe<5ti< compassfonate appointment. The pet State counse! 'submits that the pe petitioner's eiigibility has to be checki the petitioner may be directed to ma| competent authorities and if such GGnsidered and decided. Havlng'conside.red and withou| the case, in the opinion ofthis Court,| is given to the petitionerto make a before the competent authority oftll petitibn and this order, within th| representatlon being flled, the comj decide the same on its own merits ir| preferably within three months from required, the petitioner may also be h4 tt is made clear that jf any grie'] avail the aiternative remedy avajlabie With.the aforesaid observation^ Certified copy as per ruies. <^l<l^<4i'1: 'qTR^ff ^ t^^ '<n»l^i!< ^ s^if sn^i . the petitioner. , 1.'Advocate for the State, on advance |ner submits that it is a matter relating to lioner's father died on 1-6-1998. Learned ^titioner's father was a sales man and ^d. He further submits that for the present |<e a representation before the concerned refciresentation is made, the same shall be expressing any opinion on the merits of jends of justice will. be ssrved if a directiori detailed representation raising his grievances |e respondsnts along with a copy of the ree weeks from today, and on such )etent authority of the respondents stiall accordance V/ith !aw as earlyas possible fhe date of receipt of the representation..lf tard.; . , ^ance of the petitioner still remains, he may inder the law. thispetition stands disposed of, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge -^1iW ^T"3^l' <p