IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2459 of 2010 Between: S.Srinivasulu ..... PETITIONER AND Ramapuram Munemma .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2459 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner is the defendant in the suit O.S.406/2008 filed by the respondent herein on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge,Tirupati for recovery of money based on the suit promissory note dated 03.11.2005. The petitioner filed I.A.597/2009 under Sec.45 of the Indian Evidence Act for sending the disputed signatures on the suit promissory note to compare with that of the admitted signatures to a handwriting expert. What are the admitted signatures are not at all stated in the affidavit filed by the petitioner. He simply filed the said application to send the disputed signatures of the suit promissory note with that of the admitted signatures. No contemporaneous document containing the admitted signatures is filed. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the affidavit filed by the petitioner itself is bereft of any material particulars entitling him to send the promissory note for comparison of the same with that of the admitted signatures. Therefore, the Court below rightly dismissed the said application. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the said order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 02.07.2010 Dsr