1 wp6709-09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | WRIT PETITION NO.6709/2009. Ashok Abasaheb Deshmukh Vs National Council for Teachers Education & Ors. .... Mr.V.D.Hon,Adv.for petr. Mr.S.S.Bora,Adv.for R.1. Mr. S.K.Kadam,AGP for R.2&3. .... CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & A.V.NIRGUDE,JJ. DATE : 18/03/2011. 1] We have perused the Writ Petition and the prayers made therein. We have serious doubts as to whether we can examine the challenge raised in the Writ Petition in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, we are disposing of this Writ Petition, with liberty to the petitioner to 2 wp6709-09 file Appeal under Section 18 of the National Council for Teacher s Education Act, 1993 against the order impugned in the present Writ Petition. 2] The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty as aforementioned. The petitioner is also granted liberty to file application for condonation of delay. If the application for condonation of delay is filed, the same may be considered in the light of time spent by the petitioner in prosecuting the remedy of Writ Petition. However, we shall not be understood to have issued any direction on merits of the application for condonation of the delay and the appeal that the petitioner proposes to file, the appellate authority shall deal with the application and the appeal on merits in accordance with law. [A.V.NIRGUDE] [D.B.BHOSALE] JUDGE JUDGE umg/wp6709-09