HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10249 of 2008 Date: 06.07.2010 Between: Smt. N. Sharada & others. … Petitioners And The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10249 of 2008 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners, who are wife and children of one Late Sri Mallikarjun, seek directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents 2 and 3 in interfering with the civil disputes between petitioners and respondent No.4, including interference with their possession over the agricultural land covered by Survey No.164/E admeasuring Ac.0-33 gts., 165/E admeasuring Ac.0-35 gts., 202/E admeasuring Ac.0-12 gts., 277/E admeasuring Ac.0-14 gts., 278/E admeasuring Ac.0-15 gts., 206/E admeasuring Ac.0-02 gts., 166/AA admeasuring Ac.3-00 gts., 207/E admeasuring Ac.0-07 gts. and Sy.No.201/RU admeasuring Ac.0-11 gts., totally admeasuring Ac.6-09 gts., situated at Jangamaipally village of Ghanpur Mandal in Mahabubnagar District, as illegal and arbitrary. Respondent No.4 herein is the sister-in-law of 1st petitioner (sister of Late Sri Mallikarjun). After the death of Mallikarjun, several civil disputes arose between the petitioners on one hand and respondent No.4 on the other hand, with regard to the agricultural lands and the fixed deposits etc., left by Sri Mallikarjun. So far as this writ petition is concerned, it is the grievance of the petitioners that at the instance of respondent No.4, respondents 2 and 3 are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of petitioners over the lands referred above. As such, they questioned the action of respondents 2 and 3 in interfering with the civil disputes. A detailed counter affidavit is filed by respondent No.3. In the counter affidavit, it is stated that on a complaint made by respondent No.4 against the petitioners herein, a case in Crime No.13 of 2008 was registered for the offences under Secs.324 and 323 r/w. 34 of IPC, and in connection with the said case, investigation was conducted by examining the witnesses and the charge sheet was also filed and the same is pending trial in C.C.No.171 of 2008 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Wanaparthy. Further, in paragraph 4 of the counter, in clear terms, it is stated that the respondent-Police never interfered with the civil disputes pending inter se between the petitioners and respondent No.4. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.3, it is clear that so far as Crime No.13 of 2008 is concerned, already final report is filed and the same is pending trial. Further, with regard to civil disputes, as it is stated that the Police are not interfering with the same, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between petitioners and respondent No.4 with regard to the agricultural lands and the claim over fixed deposits, etc. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th July 2010 ajr