T- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BSLASPUR W.P.(227) No.5963/2009 PETST!ONERS RESPONDENT 1 Ashok Kumar Bhale, aged about 51 years, 2 Anil Kumar Bhale, aged about 49 years, Note:Both petitioners No.land 2 are sons of late Madhav Rao, residents of Tatyapara, Near Hanuman Mandir, Raipur, Tahsil and Distt.Raipur (C.G.) 3 Ganga Bai Agrawal, aged about 60 years, W/o Shri G.D. Agrawal, through Power of Attorney Hoider and son of Shri Hemraj Agrawal, aged about 38 years, S/o Shri G.D. Agarv/al,r/o Lodhipara, Station Road, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) Versus Prakash Kaur, aged about 60 years, Wd/o late Shri Guruvachan Singh, r/o Near Panda Mandir, Station Road, Raipur (C.G.) WRiT PETIT10N UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA Appearance: Shri Govind Ram Mirri and Shri Ratan Pusty. Counsel for the petitioners. ORAL ORDER (2G.10.200S) SUNILKUIVIARS8NHA.J. Heard. Belng aggrieved with the order dated 14.09.2009 passed in Civll Suit No.14-A/2009, by XI Civif Judge Class-ll, Raipur (C.G.), whereby, an application filed under Order 14 Ruie 5 read with Section 151 ofthe Code of Civii Procedure, for framing of additionai issues has been dismissed, the petitioners/plaintiffs have filed this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdrav/ this petition. Permission granted. Accordingly, W.P.(227) No.5963/2009 is dismissed, as withdrawn. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge l^i^^ s .