IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 16TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 25TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 17786 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ MOHAMMDALI, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. AHMED KUTTY MASTER, RESIDING AT VALAPPIL MEPPARAMBATHU TRIPPANDODU, KAIMALASERY,TIRUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.SYAM J SAM RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE. 3. KADAVATH KUNJUMON, S/O. MOHAMMED MASTER, CHERIYACHAM VEETIL, POYILISSERY.P.O, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM -02. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.17786/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.C.NO.378/2008 OF THE SESSIONS COURT, MALAPPURAM. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REGISTERED NOTICE DT.10.6.2008. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.17786 OF 2008 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that he is being harassed by the police at the instance of the 3rd respondent. The said respondent is the brother of petitioner's estranged wife. The petitioner is the owner of a flat at G.K.Sankunni Road, Nadakkavu, Kozhikode. He submits the 1st respondent is threatening and intimidating him to compel him to assign the rights over the flat in favour of his wife. In the above background, this writ petition was filed seeking appropriate directions against the police officials. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the flat is let out and the 3/4th of the flat is owned by the children of the petitioner. They filed a complaint before the police alleging that the petitioner is threatening and intimidating them. In the above background, the petitioner was W.P.(C) No.17786/2008 2 summoned to the police station. But, he has chosen not to appear, it is submitted. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that the police have no intention to interfere in the family dispute or harass the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will not intimidate or harass his children. The above submissions, made by the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the petitioner, are recorded and the writ petition is disposed of. (K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) ps