1 10.cas-552-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION jmi CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 552 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 4250 OF 2010. Shri Jotiram Mahadeo More. ..Applicant. vs. Shri Shamrao Pandurang More & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Prakash Mahadik, i/b. Mr. Sandeep Dadwal, for Applicant. Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar, for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. .... CORAM : G.S. GODBOLE, J. DATE : 24TH AUGUST 2011. P.C. : Heard Mr. Mahadik for the Applicant and Mr. Venegaonkar for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Notice issued to Respondent No.1 is returned unserved as reported to be dead. Mr. Mahadik has brought to my attention that the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are the Sons of the deceased Respondent No.1 and hence, the estate of the deceased is already represented. Hence it is not necessary to adjourn the hearing for that purpose. 2. Accepting the reasons given in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. If there are no objections in the Second Appeal, Office to assign the date as per the CMIS. [ G.S. GODBOLE, J. ]