2. .V :/ ^L^ ,y v ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR (C.G.) W.P.NO.J"7-<>^:/ OE- 2001 / BETWEEN 1» Peela Bai Vite o-E Samaru Lal Ganda ,aged about 36 years occupatlon sarpanch, Gram Banchaya-t Ghandra Nagar,ihana sarsivan Tahsil Bilaigarh, district Raipur. PETITICNER A N D State of Chhattisgarh,through Secretary Panchayat department, D.K.Buildlng, Raipur. The Upper Collector Baloda Bazar, Dis-tric-t Raipur.' ^ ^y ^•^> 4l 3« Erescribed Offlcer/Sub rdvisional Officer Bilalgarh, Dtstrict Raipur. Sceslding Officer, Naib Tahsildar Bilaigarh, District Raipur. 5. Sahni s/o Jogiram Sgnwara, Up sarpanch, R/o Rankot 6. Rie-tru S/o Makra-t ,Panch, by cas-fce sanwra. 7. Bodhni Bai T//o Chetram Sani<ra. 8. Parasmati W/o Biojram Yadav. 9. Panchmati W/o Gover^han sanwra. 10. Saujilal S/o Gulal Singh Gond, 11. temcharan S/o Salik Ram Marar 12. Rambharos s/o Bundram Marar 1 3. aiarat S/o chandan Singh Binjhwar 14. suniya Bal vi/o Munkuram Gond. 15. Tikam Prasad S/0 Charan •'&dav Sesponden-ts no.5 to 15 ai-e Panch at Gram Banchayat Chandra Nagar,Tahsil Bilalgarh Distfict Raiptu-. WRIT PETITICN UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE GONSTI'riJTICTIS O? INDIA ,1 XI-HC-22 ^? ^fpVvpf, ^Tfl'y'ito, fadi^y ^^1 Id.P.No.1750/2001 sn^iqiT 'R;ii??snt?i '^ifi^? '-.nl' /* STT^I ^gian ^ftg 8.10.2001 llearned eounsel for the Shri A'wadb Tripafcbl, petitioher. Stiri Rajeev shriyastalya, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent / State. .Heard. . : • . , Tbe writ petitioner;'i^t- ?i— tehle ain In a no conficten^mot;|ion sought to be removed froin! He £J.le^[an appeal before Baloda Bazar and tbe same isl autbority. Pailiitg to gefc tbe petitioner has approache|d writ petition under Arti.de of India. According to Shri £or the petitioner tbis reserved for Tribal• So fari over to any one. After eounsel for the petitioner Shrlvastava, learned eoansell to 4 X am of tbe yiew that been filed before the Apoeal sbould be deel.cte^pn^ Awaldh compe-qent qipfeiN 'wW. ^ re^'!:( ^7 3lP(T<T 3Iit?I ep.eeted as .Sarpancb. moved; aga-tnst him he tbe post of Sarpancb. s AddJ.tional Collector at pending before the sald interin order of stay this court by filing ]226 of tbe Constitution Tripathi, learned counsel post of Sarpanch is charge has not been banded Shrl Tripathi, learned well as Shri Rajeev for the respondents No.l s|iace appeal has already Sot^ft.'^^ authority, the &a4^.—, \ '. Imerit by the Appellate partjicular hear|ing a|s [^^9^ 31T^?T tsqi ( yf^q<itT), f?~iN3TR?I •gTO^att'f ss/- snt^i 's^iiw: 'Hfei l»n?if?NhTTiriW? 1i^ :rfsn<rc ^T S^!^ 5Fl^sT (Coatd.order dated 8.10. 2(^01) -s Authority. In tbe result, thi^ petltion is disposed of witb the direction that a^peal pending.before the 1 Additlonai Gollector. at^Bilbda Bazar be declded finally after heari.ng the parties on merit Let it be done witl|tin a period of one month froffl tbe first date of apliearance by the petitioner before the A.ppellate Auth<t>rity^ I direGt the petitioner to appear toefo^e A.adtt.tonal Collecto^ on 1.5tte OetQbefr» 2001. Ttll-tben, status4l>oas csgards the post of Sarpaneh -be naJ.nfeained as tt exists on this clate, Thi-s petition is d^sposed^f accordingly _l__ Sd/- ChiefJustice