Writ Petition No. 1720 (SS) of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Withdrawal App. No. 6017 of 2006 Heard Sri Vinay Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners / applicants and learned standing counsel for the respondents. By means of this application, learned counsel for the petitioners / applicants wants to withdraw the writ petition on behalf of petitioners no. 18, 19, 20 and 21 namely Sri Ravindra Singh, Bhajan Singh, Mani Lal and Janak Bahadur. Application is allowed. Writ petition is dismiss as withdrawn on behalf of petitioners no. 18, 19, 20 and 21. Writ petition shall proceed in regard to rest of the petitioners. Withdrawal application is disposed of 19.05.2006 M.M. Ghildiyal SKS Writ Petition No. 1720 (SS) of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard. Sri S. S. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the rest of the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the State of Uttaranchal have submitted the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgement and order dated 04.03.2006 passed by Division Bench of this court in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others), as such, the present writ petition may be disposed of on the same terms and conditions of the aforesaid judgement. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of on the same terms and conditions of judgement and order dated 04.03.2006 passed by Division Bench of this court in Special Appeal No. 66 of 2005 (State of Uttaranchal and others Vs. Pushkar Bhatt and others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 19.05.2006 M.M. Ghildiyal S.K.S