1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1376/2005 (Arjun Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :: 20.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.P.C. Solanki, for the petitioner. Mr.B.L. Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, the petitioner was charge-sheeted under Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958. Although very serious charges were levelled against the petitioner, but the respondent department after taking lenient view issued charge-sheet for imposing minor penalty under Rule 17 of the CCA Rules, 1958 and after providing opportunity of hearing, punishment of censure was imposed upon the petitioner. Against the said punishment of censure, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner and the same was dismissed by the appellate authority. So also, reviewing authority has also rejected the review petition filed by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, I am of the opinion that there is no reason or ground to interfere with the concurrent findings given by the disciplinary authority, appellate authority 2 and reviewing authority because for alleged misconduct very lenient view has been taken by the respondents while imposing penalty of censure. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-