asmw wag Shii Kishore Badhuii, counsel for the petitioner. 3111i Vinav Haiit, counsel for the reSpondentg. Hliard’ The petitioner haS prefen’ 3d this writ petition under Articie 2'26] 227 of the Conetitution of hidia for issuance of the direction to the respondsnts not to up—r: péti’ubner across th6 Railwav tr; thf: other Side 0f m6 Railwav trat Th6 13Etitioller’$ case 1S th: graduatt: and is a Cable Opmat provicling such cable connet registration N04 is 299. C( enclosed which is A1111exure submittad that certain staff of t} Railway DEPaItment‘ to allow‘ line under and the respondent connsctions acx’ogs the Railwm petitioner. Now the respondent no.3 accordingly pamittEd thE )uta the. cable connections of the. ack to the. Staff colonv which 011 ii. at tho petitioner is an unemploycd g2 :tions to tho customcm. His 13p}? of registration certificate is P/ 1. Counsael for the petitioner Le Railway Colony approached the the petitioner to provide cable 01‘. Ho Earns his livc‘lilmod r7: authorities; have directed 1:11 connEctionS. I hav& heard Mr. Kishozx pétitionér alld Mr. Villav E 1‘6spoudentS. (701111361 far the raspond not in a posixion to flle the 1‘6. r116 csrtain circulars 13$u€d bv to tims. He furnhm‘ submitted the appropriam Authority far s to lav tlm cablt: undEr thr: F Cumpctcnt Auflmn'iy is a Div The petitioner $houlc'i approac] pennission for laymg the cablJ too the petitioner iS required I o pay certain licence fee. Counsei for the petitioner agrees to that ’ and submits that he wili move the Divisionai Railway Manager gin any legal fee is required to pay, he will pay the same. P.W.D. to up—route the cable (D ? Badhuri, Counsel on behalf of the Emit, eouneel 011 behalf of the ents submits that as 0f 110w he is turn since he is required to collect, the Railway Department from time V that the petitioner has not moved eeking the permission to allow him failway lines. In this case, the isional Railway Manager to Whom 1 and the said euthon‘tjv can grant 2 under the Railwav lines and that weW XI~HC—22 Wm Qww/g’z; goo In visw of the submissions made by both the counsel, ii is: .rj‘lirEcted that if the petitigner movas the D.R,M., Bilaspur, within tan days for $aek1‘ng parnu’sgion for laying the Televigion Cable in order to provide the Teievision under tlm Railway 1m€s connficIionS To the rasidam s of The Railway cokmy, his apph‘cation be considered and pass he appropriata ox‘dEr 1'11 the matter, at the earliest. In the meail‘ D. RM. , petitioner’s existih With the aforesaid ( disposed of. Consequen‘ reaef anti. I‘A.N0.549’2/2 cliSposcd 0£ mile‘ iill the decision is taken, by the {system should not be disturbed. abservations, this Wiit petition staiids 1y, M.W.P.No.1659/2003 for interim 303 for urgent hearing also stand % Sd/-_ L.C.BHADOO Judge New