C482 No.700/2009 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. (Compounding/Compromise Appln. No.984/11) Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the respondent. Heard upon the compromise/ compounding application as well as upon the merits of the main petition. Respondent-Pranjal Tyagi is personally present in the Court, who is represented by his advocate Sri Parikshit Saini. Applicant-Smt. Upasana Tyagi is not personally present, however her father Mool Chand Tyagi is present, being represented by Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate. This petition was filed to quash the summoning order dated 25.11.2008 in criminal complaint case no.1352 of 2008 filed by Pranjal Tyagi against the applicant-Smt. Upasana Tyagi for the offences of Section 323, 324 and 506 IPC, pending in the court of First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. In view of the terms of the compromise, stated in the application no.984/2011, the said order of cognizance is quashed along with the complaint case no.1352/2008 itself. Thus, compromise application is allowed and the C482 petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 24.08.2011 Rdang