IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2008 Janardhan Pundalik Sarang. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. H.E.Palwe for the applicant. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 24th June 2008. DATED: 24th June 2008. DATED: 24th June 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By this application filed under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant is seeking anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-43/2007 registered with Sarvade Police Station, Ratnagiri for the offences punishable under sections 419, 420, 468, 471 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The applicant along with other accused executed sale-deed of Gat No.465 in favour of Mohamad Ashraf Mohamad Haji on the basis of power of attorney executed in his favour of accused No.1- Smt.Laxmibai Ramchandra Dalvi, posing herself as Sitabai Ramchandra Dalvi. Prima facie; involvement of the applicant in commission of offence is demonstrated. In order to bring truth on record necessity of custodial interrogation cannot be ruled out. 4. In the above view of the matter, at this stage of the investigation, it will not be in the interest of the investigation to grant this application for anticipatory bail. The applicant may surrender before the trial Court within one week and obtain regular bail. In the event of application for bail moved by the applicant with advance notice to the State, the trial Court to consider the same on its own merits. 5. Application is disposed of in terms of this order with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the applicant. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE