IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-26245 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 31.10.2011 Satnam Singh alias Satpal Singh alias Satta .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manohar Lall, Addl. A.G., Punjab. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral ) During investigation, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Subsequently, after presentation of challan, he was released on regular bail and since 2007, he was regularly appearing in the trial court. However, on 9.4.2011, due to his sickness, the petitioner could not appear before the trial court. On that day, his bail bonds were cancelled and non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued. Vide interim order dated 9.9.2011, while issuing notice of motion in this petition, arrest of the petitioner was stayed subject to the condition that he will appear before the trial court within seven days and furnish his fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court with an undertaking that in future, he will continue to appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing. Crl. Misc. No. M-26245 of 2011 -2- The said period of seven days was extended vide order dated 4.10.2011 and the case was adjourned for today. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the petitioner has appeared before the trial court and furnished his fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court with an undertaking that in future, he will continue to appear before the trial court on each and every date of hearing. This fact has been confirmed by learned counsel for the respondent-State, after having instructions from ASI Sukhdev Singh, who is present in the Court. In view of this factual position, the interim order dated 9.9.2011 is made absolute. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 31, 2011 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE