1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2194 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri S.S. Patwardhan for the Petitioners. ­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: . The Petitioners are some of the Judgment Debtors in the execution of a decree. The Petitioners made an application that certain third parties should be impleaded as parties to the execution application. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. Considering the scope of the execution application, at the instance of the Judgment Debtors, the Trial Court could not have added third parties as the parties to the execution application. Hence, no case for interference is made out. The Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. (A.S.OKA, J)