IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 18898 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 14th December, 2011. Priyanka Petitioner through Mr. Raman B.Garg, Advocate Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Respondents through Mr. R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana Mr. P.K.Chugh, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 states that the petitioner has been admitted to Vaish College of Engineering, Rohtak in the branch of her choice, i.e., Electrical Engineering and she is permitted to attend her classes regularly and take examination. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, however, with a clarificatory direction that the petitioner shall be treated as a regular student for all intent and purposes. Dasti. December 14, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE