IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2006 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1928 WA.No. 2347 of 2006() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.6058/2006 Dated 02/03/2006 .................... APPELLANT: APPELLANT: ---------------------------- THE HEAD, CENTRAL PLANTATION CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, REGIONAL STATION, KAYAMKULAM, KRISHNAPURAM P.O. - 690 533. BY ADV. SRI.P.JACOB VARGHESE, SC, ICAR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------ 1. SHRI.N.REGHU, PATTANITHARAYIL HOUSE, KRISHNAPURAM P.O., KAYAMKULAM - 690 533. 2. K.BABU, THOPPIL THEKKETHIL HOUSE, KRISHNAPURAM P.O., KAYAMKULAM- 690 533. 3. K.HARIDAS, CHAKKALIL, THEKETHIL HOUSE, KAPPIL WEST, KRISHNAPURAM P.O., KAYAMKULAM. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 14/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K. BALI, C.J. & C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- W.A.No.2347 of 2006 & C.M.Appln.No.1271 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 14th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J.(Oral) Delay condoned. 2. In our considered view, no exception can at all be made to the order passed by the learned Single Judge as it was only a case of making of applications under Section 33 C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act for computation of the benefits that would accrue to the workmen on account of the awards given earlier in point of time. Such applications should and ought to have been determined by the Labour Court and not by the Central Administrative Tribunal as contented by the learned counsel. There is no illegality or infirmity in the order passed by W.A.No.2347/2006 2 the learned Single Judge dated 2nd March, 2006 in W.P.(C) No.6058 of 2006. No merits. Dismissed. V.K. BALI, CHIEF JUSTICE. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. vns