1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 319 OF 2011. Shiva Ramaji Sonwane .vs. The State of Maharashtra & another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. S.B. Saikhede, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : JUNE 28, 2011. Heard Ms. S.B. Saikhede, learned Advocate for petitioner and Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, learned A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. The petitioner had preferred an application for parole. The said application for parole came to be rejected. Hence, the petitioner has preferred the present petition. Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, learned A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2, pointed out that the reason for which the petitioner was not granted parole was that the surety proposed by the petitioner was not found to be suitable. This appears to be the only ground on which the 2 petitioner has not been released on parole. In this view of the matter, it is directed that as soon as the petitioner furnishes a suitable surety, he be released on parole on the usual terms and conditions. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. Hamdast granted. Judge Judge J.