1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1814 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 1814 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO. 1814 OF 2003 Mr. Vasant L. Bedekar ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.. Respondents Ms. Ranjana Thodankar with Mr. S.S. Pakale for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. P.P. Chavan for R. No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : JANUARY 10, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 10, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 10, 2006 P.C. . The issue involved in this petition was also in issue in Writ Petition No. 746 of 1996 along with Writ Petition No. 1356 of 1994 which has been disposed of by this court by order dated 20.2.2005. The learned Division Bench of this court while considering the relevant resolution has noted that in order to have the higher pay scale, the teacher 2 must have both degree in one subject and B. Ed. qualification. . On behalf of the Petitioner, the learned counsel seeks to point out that the view taken by the leaned Division Bench has not taken into consideration the correct terminology of the resolution. After hearing the counsel, we are clearly of the view that the reading of the clauses together can only lead to the interpretation given by the Division Bench of this Court in its judgement dated 20.2.2005 in Writ Petition NO. 746 of 1996 along with Writ Petition No. 1356 of 1993. . In the light of that there is no merit in this petition. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)