IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 19TH MAGHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 46 of 2010(S) --------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- VIGNESH.S.B,2/82,BRAHMAPURAM,THAKKALA, KUMARAKOVIL.P.O,KANYAKUMARI,PRESENTLY RESIDING AT: TC 6/230(1),SAYANORA,PRA-56,THITTAMANGALAM, VATTIROORKAVU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. PADMANABHA PILLAI,KRISHNA NAGAR, BRAHMAPURAM,THAKKALA,KUMARAKOVIL,KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT,TAMILNADU-621010. 2. PURUSHOTHAMAN,KRISHNA NAGAR, BRAHMAPURAM,THAKKALA,KUMARAKOVIL,KANYAKUMARI DIST, TAMILNADU-621010. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR FOR R1 & 2 SMT.P.A.ANITHA FOR R1 & 2 R3 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(CRL).NO.46 OF 2010 S PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 13.9.2009. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE PHOTO. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DATED 23.10.2009. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SSLC. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSFER CERTIFICATE. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22.1.2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(CRL). NO. 46 OF 2010 S --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th February, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Today, the alleged detenu was produced before us. She would submit that she is not in any illegal detention as such. She submits that she is aged twenty. She would say that she likes to go with her parents for the time being, and she intends to go back with the petitioner whom she has married. Shri B.S. Swathi Kumar, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that respondents 1 and 2 will not stand in the way of the detenu telephoning the petitioner or the petitioner telephoning the detenu. We record the submission of the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and dispose of the Writ Petition. We also make it clear that this will be without prejudice to any other right available to the petitioner in law. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge