!• . (.'€1 (1, c •" • IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF C'HHATTlSG^te AT BHASPUR ^g-^ WMTPETTrONNO. 2004. PETmONER:- ^o |rt-i -.-• r^AaS^-^""ri -M^-^SD^^ , -••"^.^.•^^""l'^1 ' ' n.l-t<\ ••'"? -- '••'><•• ^:^-^^^ ?l••sft1' <lrfl ,.& VERSUS Mitrasen Shanna Age 55 years S/0- Late Kedar Prasad Shanna Accountant Block Education Ofiice Dondi, Tahsil- Balod Distt-Durg(C.G.) .RESPONDENTS:- ,<6 <.. fctf^"^ ],. ^y' ^.(^ 1) State ofCUiattisgarh, Through- Secretary, TnUe Wetfare Departuent D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2) Collectbr, TribleWelfareBrandi Collectorate Durg(C.G.) y4^' -^W^T^TmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTIONOF INDIA. -f- .^fc' ^=T^irara?r, '^cftws, Mdjy^ . Lo() V^l^ 3TI^I ~S!^V (1^3q^q) ^^ 12-11-2004 Shri Virendra Shanna, cmmsel for^e petilimier. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Oovt Advocate fi^- the State. - AppUeation for u'gent heariag is aBc|wed. Hcaid. I Leamed counset for tte petiliaierslsulmuts that Ae niatte' telates to transfer [)f Ae pstiftmer. Hs fiutfaer sBibnrits tfast (ie is an offiee bearw. He furdier subnrits putt tw the preseiu the pettlotwr ttay be feiven an q)portuntty.of flUi^ flie detaBed ^epteaeats&m befiMe <he conapeteit auth^aily of die resp<mdente, wtucli skaU be Ixnsidwed un iis uwn merits in aeuordance Ivilh law, Havins considered and withoirt dMwessing anv (XHBios OB thc nisrits of pie case, in die opinlon of diis Cour(, eaSs ot justiee wlU be servad if a {lirection is given tp the pditioaers to (nA.e a detailed representation raising ^heir grievances befwe tfie c(nq»etenta^ifliority ofthe respmdents along with ^ oopy of the petition and tius or(lar, witfun 10 days, aad <» such j^presentation being flled. ihe con^et^nt attthority of tfie respaideats stall jiecide the same on its own merits in a4»rdancewith law as early as possibk ju'eferably within six weeks from tlie dat^ ofrecei{rt oflhe mpresentaticm. K is suhmitted that tiie petitionetj has ait yet beea relieved and he may lae allowed to continue. Ifthe petitianer has nct been reli^ved, he be allowed to continue till the tepreseitfation is decided. It is made |clear tfaat if the petitioner has been (•elieved, tfiis order will not aitifle him tcj rejoin Itoe plaee ofearlier postiag. Witfi fhe aforesaid observations, 1(us p^ition stands diqxwed of Consequendy M.W.P.No.22?4/2(|)04 aiso staads disposed ef J^.te^-. -•-• — Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge •f"