IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 165 of 2004 Between: P. Nagarjuna, S/o. Prakasam, Instructor in Computer Education, I.A.S.E., S.V. University, Tirupathi, R/o. Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Chittoor District, Rep. by its Registrar. 2 The Principal, Institute of Advanced Study in Education, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Proc. No. E.II(2)/2003 dated 12- 12-2003 issued by the 1st Respondent as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same grant with all consequential benefits, monetary and otherwise Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.KASAJAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.165 OF 2004 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by an Instructor in Computer Education in the Institute of Advanced Studies in Education in the Sri Venkateswara Univerity, Tirupati, aggrieved by the proceedings of the University dated 12.12.2003 whereby he was kept under suspension with immediate effect. By interim order dated 23.01.2004, this Court directed the respondent University to pay subsistence allowance to the petitioner. Sri V.Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, placed before me the proceedings of the University dated 06.04.2005, revoking the suspension imposed upon his client with immediate effect. It is also brought to my notice that pursuant to the interim order of this Court the petitioner was paid subsistence allowance upto 31.08.2004 and was not paid thereafter. In view of the fact that the respondent University has itself revoked the suspension imposed upon the petitioner under it’s proceedings dated 06.04.2005, no cause survives for consideration in this writ petition. The consequences and repercussions that follow upon the revocation of the suspension of the petitioner by the proceedings dated 06.04.2005 and the denial of subsistence allowance to the petitioner after 31.08.2004 give rise to fresh causes of action for which the petitioner would have to invoke separate remedies available to him in law. No further orders are required in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J. 21st August, 2009. VGSR / PGS