IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3610 of 2007 BINOD KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI GULABCHAND SINGH, A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SARAN, P.O. BHALUNI DHAN, P.S.DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS...............PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SECRETARY,. PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION,BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DISTRICT- MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ROHTAS. 5. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,ROHTAS. 6. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, DINARA(NORTH). 7. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT KARANJ, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS, INTER-50.33%.B.A. 8. MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT KARANJ, P.O BHALUNIDHAM, P.S. DINARA. DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 9. MUNNA KUMAR OJHA, S/O SRI RAMJI OJHA, A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RANI, P.O. MAHROR, P.S. KINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 10. RAJEEV KUMAR PANDEY S/O SRI RAMAKANT PANDEY A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MUKUNDPUR, P.O. JIGNA,P.S. DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. 11. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O SRI NIWAS SINGH, A RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SARANA, P.O,=- BHALUNI DHAM P.S. DINARA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. ...................RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 01.10.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present and would point out that the following relief prayed by the petitioner in this writ application. “That this petition is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent authorities to consider the case at the petitioner and appoint him to the post of Shiksha Mitra in Cram Panchayat Karanj within the Kinara (north) Block in the district of Rohtas because he has more weightage points than respondent No.9,10 and 11 who have been illegally appointed in preference to the petitioner though they are inferior to the petitioner in the total weightage. The petitioner further pray for any other relief or 2 reliefs to which he is found fit and entitled.” so far as it relates to a direction for appointment of the petitioner on the post of Siksha Mitra cannot be allowed inasmuch as the post of Siksha Mitra stands abolished with effect from 1/7/2006 and for the rest of the grievance of the petitioner relating to alleged illegality in the selection and appointment of respondent Nos. 9, 10 and 11, the petitioner has an effective statutory alternative remedy of moving the District Teachers Appellate Authority. In the opinion of the court counsel for the State is absolutely correct That being so, this writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move the said authority. Devendra (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)