IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16037 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PAPPUKUTTY NALINAKASHI,W/O. RAGHAVAN, GURU MANDIRAM, MARKET ROAD, ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH SMT.A.K.PREETHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TAHSILDAR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU THALUK, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, ATTINGAL. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ATTINGAL VILLAGE, ATTINGAL 695101. BY GP SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).16037/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims title to 57 cents of land and it seems that there was a dispute of title and possession raised by a neighbouring property owner which ultimately resulted in Exts.P1 and P2 judgments. In spite of the same, petitioner's request for mutation has not been accepted. Ext.P7 is pending in this regard before the Tahsildar. 2. Having heard learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P7 and if there is no factor standing in the way of mutation being effected, same shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If there is any objection to such mutation being effected, then a reasoned order shall be passed by the 1st respondent on Ext.P7 within the same time frame. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs