PETITIONER \/\© HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Writ PetitionJQ) No.‘ 568 of 2010 Abdul Gani Memon S/o Late Shri Abdul Gaffar Memon, aged about 32 years, R/o. — 8.861, Kaveri Vihar, N.T.P.C. Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Regidnal Transport Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) 2. Regibnal Transport Authority Bilaspur (C-G-) 3. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) jWrit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India! Appearance : Authority Mr. Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate for therespondents. t ORAL ORDER (1 3.02.201 0) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Mr. Shashank Thakur, leamed counsel for the respondents. submits that an affidavit of respondent No.1 dated 17.2.2010 has been filed. According to affidavit respondent No.1 is expediting the proceedings for counter signature in accordance with law. Paras 3 & 4 of affidavit read as under:- “3. That, the petitioner has made an application for counter signature ofthe above said permit on 04.02.2010. 4. It is most respectfully submitted that a publication to this effect in accordance with Section’87 of the Motors Vehicle Act, 1988 has to be made and objections are to be invited. The respondents most humbly submit that a publication will be issued on 18.02.2010 and after considering objections if any, the petitioner‘s application for counter signature will be decided immediately in the Fo'rm prescribed in respect of temporary permit in Form M.P.M.V.R. 51 (TP) in accordance with law.” In view of the categorical statements made in Paras- 3 & 4 of the affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file another-«petition, in case, his application for counter signature is not disposed cf \ by the concerned authority at the earliest. wuf