: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1887 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1887 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1887 OF 2007 Ms.Ashwini Bolinjkar ...Applicant. V/s. Shri Kalind D. Bolinjkar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mrs.Anita Agarwarwal for I.R.Kulkarni, advs. for the Applicant. Shri Kalind D. Bolinjkar, respondent no.1 present in person. Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, APP for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 20th June, 2007. DATE : 20th June, 2007. DATE : 20th June, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The applicant has filed this application through her father and Power of Attorney Holder. The applicant has filed the case registered as C.C.No.547/PW/05 pending before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court at Bandra against her husband and his parents, who are the respondent nos.1 to 3. The case is under Section 498A of the I.P.C. By this application, the applicant herself seeks to quash the proceeding in the said criminal case in view of amicable settlement as per the ’Consent Terms’ filed before the Family Court in M.J.Petition No.A-1415 of 2004. In view of said ’Consent Terms’, decree of divorce has been passed and as per paragraph 6 of the : 2 : Consent Terms, the applicant was to withdraw the criminal case . The Power of Attorney holder of the applicant, is present before the Court alongwith his counsel Mrs.Anita Agarwal. The respondent no.1 is also present. 2. In view of the above circumstances, I find that it will be in the interest of justice to allow this application and to quash the proceeding in the criminal case. 3. In the result, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)