IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2055 of 2010 (M/S) M/s Citurgia Bio Chemicals Ltd. ……Petitioner. Versus State and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Arvind Vashishta, counsel for petitioner. Mr. S.N. Babulkar, Advocate General for respondents. Dated:-04-01-2011 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 24.11.2010, suspension order dated 27.11.2010 and cancellation order dated 30.11.2010, issued by respondent No. 2, which have been annexed as annexure nos. 2,3 and 4 respectively to the writ petition. Learned Advocate General for respondents, has informed to the Court that controversy was pending before the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition P.I.L. No. 61 of 2010, Uttarakhand Janta Sangharsh Morcha Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. The Division Bench of this Court, vide its order dated 24.12.2010, quashed all the facilities and sanction for construction, granted to the petitioner (respondent in PIL petition). I have perused the judgment and order dated 24.12.2010, passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 2 The operative portion of said order is being reproduced below:- “a. The decision contained in the Minutes of the Meeting held on 30th October, 2007; the decision conveyed by the letter dated 14th March, 2008; the decision contained in the Minutes of the Meeting held on 24th September, 2009; the permission granted by the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 26th September, 2009 to grant exemption under the provisions of the 1973 Act; the decision dated 1st October, 2009 to use power under Section 53 of the 1973 Act; and the Notification published on 5th October, 2009 under Section 53 of the 1973 Act, as well as the sanction to construct, are quashed. b. The Government as well as Citurgia are directed to forthwith approach BIFR with a request to delete, from the approved revival Scheme, that part thereof, which permits Citurgia to commercially exploit the land in question and also the direction upon the State Government to grant permission to Citurgia to do so. c. BIFR is directed to forthwith delete that part of the sanctioned Scheme, which authorized Citurgia to commercially exploit the land in question and also the direction contained therein directing the Government to accord permission to Citurgia to do so. d. The District Magistrate, Dehradun, is directed to forthwith take actual physical possession of the land in question and to keep the same in his possession. He shall permit Citurgia to use the land in question for the purpose for 3 which it had obtained the same under the conveyance referred to above and for no other purpose. e. The Government is directed to take steps pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in conveyance, if it is of the opinion that Citurgia has committed breach of the covenants contained therein.” In view of the above judgment and order dated 24.12.2010, passed by Division Bench of this Court, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is dismissed as infructuous. (B.S.Verma, J.) 04-01-2011 S