1 cac299.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 299 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2007 M/s. Polywin Industries. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Ram & Co. ..Respondents Mr. D.D. Belosay, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- AUGUST 26, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant. Copy is served on the Advocate for the Respondent and the acknowledgment is placed on record. The name of the Advocate for the Respondent is shown on board. 2. Considering the averments in the Application and accepting the explanation for delay given in paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, this Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), which read as under : 2 cac299.11 “(a) The delay in depositing the amount of compensation as ordered dated 28-6-2007 may please be condoned and time for the said deposit of compensation may please be extended. (b) The Hon'ble Court of Small Causes at Bombay may please be directed to accept the amount of deposit at the rate of Rs.2,730/- in L.E. & C. Suit No. 14/16 of 1994.” 3. On deposit being made, that should be treated as sufficient compliance of the conditions granting ad-interim relief on 28/6/2007 in CRA No. 232 of 2007. 4. Small Causes Court to act on the basis of authenticated copy of this order. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)