IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1125 OF 2005 (M/S) Aditya Todariya and another …Petitioners. Versus The Secretary, Uttaranchal Siksha Evam Praksha Parishad, Ramnagar, Nainital. .…Respondents. 1st May, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. List revised, but none appears for the petitioners. Mr. Aniruddh Bhatt, Advocate is appearing for the respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that a direction may be given by this Court for revaluation of their answer- scripts of Class X examination for which they appeared in the year, 2005. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, contends that under the rules, there is no provision of revaluation of the answer-scripts. In view of this, there is no ground for interference in a writ petition. The writ petition deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 1.5.2009 Rathour