IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 125 of 2006 Date of decision February 20, 2007 Ajit Singh .......Petitioner Versus Charanjit Singh ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present:- Sh. Vaneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. P.S. Chinha,Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent. **** Viney Mittal, J (Oral) At the outset Sh. Chinha, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab states that in terms of the directions dated November 27, 2006 passed by this Court, an FIR had been registered against the respondent and the aforesaid respondent had been arrested for the offence of 'criminal trespass'. In view of the aforesaid statement made by Sh. Chinha, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed. Ordered accordingly. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE February 20, 2007 archana