IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc M- 16821 of 2010 Date of decision: 12.7.2010 Rahul …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent Present: Mr Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr VPS Sidhu, AAG Punjab. S.S.SARON, J. Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in a case registered against him on 29.9.2008 for the offences under Sections 304, 341, 148 and 149 IPC. During investigation, the petitioner was not found liable for the offences and was not sent up for trial. His name was placed in column-2 of the Charge Report (Challan) that was filed. He was summoned as an additional accused vide order dated 16.3.2010 (P3) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar. He has been summoned in terms of Section 319 CrPC. Therefore, his custody is not required for the purposes of investigation. The real intent of summoning the petitioner is to ensure his presence during the trial of the case. In consequence of the interim bail granted on 7.6.2010, the petitioner has put in appearance before the trial Court and submitted his bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Cr Misc M- 16821 of 2010 2 In the aforenoticed circumstances, the interim bail granted on 7.6.2010 is made absolute. This petition stands disposed of. 12.7.2010 ( S.S.SARON ) ASR Judge