IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2009 / 4TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 15801 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JACOB P.J., S/O.CHACKO, AGED 37, PITTAPPILLIL HOUSE, CHUNGATHARA P.O., NILAMBUR-679334. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.SAJU WAHAB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT), GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER, NILAMBUR. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, WANDOOR P.O. 4. THE MANAGER, CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, DIOCESE OF BATHERY, BISHOP'S HOUSE, SULTHANBATHERY-PIN-673 592. ADV. SRI.K.BABU THOMAS FOR R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.T.B.RAMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 3/11/2006 OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF SUICIDE NOTE WRITTEN BY NEETHU EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.C NO.954/2008 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 7/8/2008 PASSED BY SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 30/09/2008 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. \\TRUE COPY// P.A.to JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.15801/2009-U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 25th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, while working as Physical Education Teacher, under the fourth respondent educational agency, was placed under suspension as per order dated 03/11/2006. Initially, the order of suspension was approved by the second respondent. Presently, by Ext.P4, the Deputy Director of Education has passed an order whereby the petitioner was directed to be reinstated in service. The said order is dated 07/08/2008. Seeking implementation of Ext.P4, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Manager. It is submitted that the Manager has no objection in reinstating the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P4 order. Therefore, there will be a direction to the fourth respondent that the petitioner will be reinstated in service forthwith. If the petitioner has got any monetary claims, it is upto the petitioner to move the appropriate authority. The writ petition is allowed. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE ms