1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 293 of 2009 Sundersingh Bhavnani .....Appellant. Versus Ghevarchand Jogani .....Respondent. Mr.V. G. Mehta for the Appellant. Mr. Digvijay Singh i/b. Mr. R. B. Singh for the Respondent. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 18th JULY, 2009. P.C.: Heard Mr. V.G.Mehta for the Appellant and Mr. D.L.Singh for the Respondents. 2. The Appellant is a Senior Citizen, who is 85 years old. He filed notice of motion for various reliefs including temporary injunction restraining the Respondent from parting with the possession of the suit flat or creating third party interest in respect thereof. This notice of motion was rejected and therefore, the present Appeal from Order. 3. Mr. Mehta, learned Counsel for the Appellant, makes a statement that the pleadings of the parties are already completed and the suit is at the stage of framing of issues. He submits that if the suit is directed to be heard expeditiously, then he will not press the present Appeal from Order. 2 4. Taking into consideration the controversy involved in the suit and especially the age of the Appellant, I am inclined to issue directions for expeditious hearing of the said suit. 5. In the above circumstances, I dispose of the Appeal from Order by passing the following order: i) The Appeal from Order is disposed of, as not pressed. The learned Trial Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably by the end of 30th April, 2010. ii) The parties to the suit shall co-operate with the learned Trial Judge for expeditious hearing of the suit and they shall not claim unnecessary adjournments, except for genuine reasons. sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)