IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 RP.No. 347 of 2009(H) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22549/2007 Dated 25/03/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.KURUVILLA JACOB, S/O. LATE JACOB KURUVILLA, OTTATHYCAL HOUSE, MARKET ROAD, CHINGAVANAM POST, NATTAKOM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROADS DIVISION, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROADS DIVISION, KOTTAYAM. 3. TH ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROADS DIVISION, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------ R.P. NO.347/2009 IN W.P.(C)No.22549/2007 ------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009 ORDER Heard both sides. I do not propose to go into the merits of the various grounds raised in this review petition. I dispose of this review petition observing that my judgment will not stand in the way of the writ petitioner approaching the Panchayat on the strength of Annexure A4. If any application is submitted by the writ petitioner to respondents 1 and 2 for getting return of the documents submitted by the petitioner for production before the Panchayat, that application will be allowed by those respondents. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE dpk