SBCRLMB NO.5818/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CR. MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5818/2010. Raashid @ Mushtaq Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order :- July 7, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Pradeep Mathur, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor ****** BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner has argued that the petitioner's application for bail was rejected by the court of Sessions merely because thirteen cases are pending against him and that by itself cannot be a reason to refuse the bail to him during the trial, more particularly when the challan has been filed long back and trial of the case is awaiting completion. Perusal of rejection order passed by the trial court reveals that the court below was not inclined to grant him bail on consideration SBCRLMB NO.5818/10. 2 of the fact about pendency of thirteen cases in number and that too of similar nature and accused, who has been granted indulgence by the court, misused such indulgence by repeatedly involving himself in similar offence and has thus become menace to the society and his liberty has to be balanced as against the interest of the society at large. Therefore, I am not inclined to grant the bail to the accused-petitioner. The bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.228/2009 registered with PS Keshorepura, Kota for offence u/S.392 IPC is accordingly rejected. However, the learned trial court is impressed upon to expedite the trial of the case and complete the same as early as possible. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J. anil