THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA O.S.A.M.P.Nos.641 and 642 of 2010 and O.S.A.No.10 of 2010 Date: 20-7-2010 Between M/s Renovau Telecom (Pvt.) Ltd., Rep. by Mr. K.S.Reddy, Chairman & CEO, Hyderabad-34 … Appellant and 1. M/s. Digital Waves, A Partnership Firm, Rep. by Mr. Preet Sonawala, Managing Partner, Bangalore-560 003 and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA O.S.A.M.P.Nos.641 and 642 of 2010 and O.S.A.No.10 of 2010 Oral Judgment: (per D.S.R.Varma, J.) Heard both sides. 2 . O.S.A.M.P.No.641 of 2010: Dispensed with for the present. 3. O.S.A.M.P.No.642 of 2010: Having regard to the facts and circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition, the delay of 354 days in filing the O.S.A., is condoned. 4 . O.S.A.No.10 of 2010: This is an appeal filed challenging the order dated 25-6-2009 in Company Petition No.101 of 2008 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court. 5. Subsequent to the filing of the present appeal, it has been reported by the counsel for both parties that the matter has been settled out of Court, as a consequence thereof, the order in the company petition is to be set aside and consequently, the appeal is to be allowed. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents endorsed the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant in all fours. 7. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, we deem it expedient to allow this appeal as prayed for. 8. In the result, the appeal is allowed by setting aside the order under appeal. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA _________________________ JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA 20th July, 2010. Note: Issue C.C. in three days. (B/o) Ak THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA O.S.A.M.P.Nos.641 and 642 of 2010 and O.S.A.No.10 of 2010 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by DSRV, J.) 20th July, 2010. (Ak)