IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 25082 of 2003 Between: M/s A.L.Sudershan & Co., A registered partnership Firm, Rep.by its partner A.L.Raja Shankar. Premises No.7-3-720, R.P.Road, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Project Director, National High Way Authority, P.I.U, No.25, Ganesh Colony, Nagpur. 2 The Asst.Project Director, National High Way Authority of India PIU, H.No.6-1-132/65, Scandagiri, Near Water Tank, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad - 500061. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in demolishing compound wall of the petitioner and trying to lay the road in Sy.No.33 part of Bowenpally Village, Secunderabad as arbitrary, illegal, high handed, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.TULASI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.M.V.Kin & Co., Advocates & Solicitors The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:07.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}