IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25613 of 2010 SATYA NARAYAN SAHNI @ BHAGYA NARAYAN SAHNI, SON OF ASHARFI SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of about six years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 22.12.2009 and undertakes to be more careful in future and he has not committed any offence in the meanwhile, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. IV, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 374 of 2001 arising out of Bochaha P.S. Case No. 105 of 1996 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is 2 implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)