1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4596 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1292 OF 2004 Kashiram Ravaji Mene Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra Respondent Ms.Smita R. Gaidhani, Advocate appointed for applicant. Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. January 09, 2006. P.C. . Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the applicant who has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge at Ratnagiri for an offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. The order of conviction and sentence has been challenged in Criminal Appeal No.1292 of 2004 but belatedly and hence this application for condonation of delay. As per the applicant the delay caused is of 76 days. The reason for delay is basically the financial conditions as set out by the applicant. 2 . We are satisfied that this is a fit case to condone the delay caused in filing the appeal. Hence the application is allowed. (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)