IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11323 of 2011 Ram Janam Prasad Sharma, Son of Late Dwarika Prasad Sharma, resident of Village & Post Office Salimpur via Khusrupur, Police Station-Bakhtiarpur, District-Patna ----------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, New Secretariat, Patna 2. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar 3. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 5. S.B.A.N. College, Darheta Lari, Jahanabad , now in the District of Arwal through its Principal ----------------------- Respondents. ----------- 2 14-07-2011 Heard Sri Anil Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Chandra, learned A.C. to the Advocate General, who appears on behalf of Respondent no.1/ State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. The petitioner, who retired as Lecturer on 31.1.2003 from S.B.A.N. College, Darheta Lari, Jahanabad, has made a prayer for directing the Respondents to make payment of all his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the claim raised in the present writ petition, the petitioner has also filed a representation before the Respondent no.3/ Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya vide Annexure-5 to the writ petition. However, till date no decision has been taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made prayer for disposing of the writ application with direction to the Respondent authority to take final decision on the representation of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Respondents has not disputed the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh 2 representation before Respondent no.3/ Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Court expects that Respondent no.3 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, Respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )