[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2101 OF 2008 Lakhan Shiva Kale ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Ms.Smita Mane Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 17, 2008 DATE : JULY 17, 2008 DATE : JULY 17, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.84 of 2006 of Walchandnagar Police Station, Pune. The said case is mainly under Sections 395 and 397 of IPC. 3. The co-accused Pramod Shinde has preferred the application for bail before this Court. By order dated 25.4.2008, this Court granted liberty to the co-accused to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court and directed the Sessions [-2-] Court to decide the matter afresh on merits. As the applicant is similarly situated, it would be appropriate that same order is passed in respect of the present applicant. 4. The applicant is permitted to file a fresh bail application before the Sessions Court. Such application to be considered by the learned Sessions Judge afresh on merits without being influenced by any of the earlier orders. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]