... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.228 OF 1995 PETITION NO.228 OF 1995 PETITION NO.228 OF 1995 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri Rahul S. Kate for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 30, 2007. : MARCH 30, 2007. : MARCH 30, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Time is sought on behalf of the Advocate for the Petitioner on the ground that the Advocate for the Petitioner is not available. Shri Kate appearing for the first Respondent pointed out that on 22nd November, 1995, the first Respondent deposited a further amount of Rs.40,871/-. He pointed out that as entire amount due and payable as per Award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal was already deposited by the first Respondent, he has already withdrawn the First Appeal No.1051 of 1994. 2. In view of these statements, it is apparent that though belatedly, a compliance with order dated 01st December, 1994 passed by this Court has been made by the first Respondent. The default cannot be said to be wilful or deliberate. In view of this position, notice issued against the Respondents is discharged. Petition is disposed of. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE