C.W.P. No.12360 of 1991 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.12360 of 1991 Date of Decision.12.09.2011 Harish Verma, Clerk, office of the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through the Secretary to Government Punjab, Department of Excise and Taxation, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents 2. C.W.P. No.12389 of 1991 Vinod Kumar, Clerk, office of the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Amritsar-II and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through the Secretary to Government Punjab, Department of Excise and Taxation, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Both these writ petitions have been directed to be posted for hearing after the disposal of the case in C.W.P. No.523 of 1989. The said writ petition has been dismissed as rendered infructuous on 23.05.2011. It is not possible for me to secure any information as to whether there arises any point for adjudication, having regard to the fact that yet another writ petition in C.W.P. No.523 of 1989 itself was C.W.P. No.12360 of 1991 -2- dismissed and this was perceived at some point of time by the petitioners as relevant for the decision in their cases. With the dismissal of the writ petition in C.W.P. No.523 of 1989, I have no reason to believe that still cause of action arises for the petitioners to pursue. 3. The writ petitions are dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 12, 2011 Pankaj*