IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4557 of 2009. Date of Decision : 13.7.2010. Ambika Gupta ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. T.S Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. No. 1 & 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner submits that her son is 100% disabled and from the place where she is posted now, it is very difficult for her to look after her child. It is also submitted that as per the policy of the State Government in respect of the employees whose disability is 60% or above, accommodation is to be given to a place where care can be given to such disabled persons. 2. Learned Senior Additional Advocate General points out that the policy of the State is only to protect the transfers and postings of those disabled employees and not to protect such transfers in case of the parents or guardians of such persons. According to the petitioner, as far as disabled persons are concerned, some special consideration has to be given by the State and the State has to frame a policy in the case of those employees whose children are 100% disabled. This is matter the Government has certainly to consider. The petitioner may move the Government in that regard, in which case, the respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action in that regard also. 3. It is seen that the petitioner herein had approached this Court earlier in CWP No. 3311 of 2009 and this Court had directed the Director to look into the representation. The Director has passed Annexure P-4, order, wherein it is stated that no representation has been filed in time. According to the petitioner, she had filed Annexure P-3, representation. Be that as it may. Now, Annexure P-3 is on the file. 4. There will be a direction to the Director to look into Annexure P-3 and pass appropriate order in view of the submissions recorded above. This shall be done within a week on production of copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 13, 2010 (HL) (Justice Kuldip Singh ), Judge