IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18028 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- E.N.SIVASANKARAN, AGED 51 YEARS, ADVOCATE, S/O.NARAYANAN, EDATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR, PIN-680003. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR, PIN-680003. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, POYYA, MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, 680733. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18028 of 2011 APPENDIX P1 : COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT DEED NO.547/2011 DATED 01.03.2011 P2 : COPY OF THE BASIC LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 27.06.2011. P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 18.06.2011. P4 : COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, POYYA DATED 24.06.2011 P5 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 25.06.2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE smvd ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18028 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be the owner of 62.89 Ares of land in Sy.No.89/1 of Pallipuram Village. According to the petitioner although the property is garden land and not wet land, the same has been included in the Data Bank prepared under S.5 of Act 28 of 2008. Therefore seeking rectification of the above, the petitioner filed Ext.P5 before the first respondent with copy to respondents 2 and 3 and that orders have not been passed on Ext.P5. Therefore this writ petition is filed. If as stated by the petitioner a mistake has been crept in the preparation of Data Bank and the same has been brought to the notice of the authorities it is necessary that the request for correction should be considered by the first respondent. In the circumstances I direct the first W.P.(C) No. 18028 OF 2011 :2 : respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the concerned authority for appropriate action. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-