IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.17563 of 2010 Date of Decision.03.11.2011 Rajat Gandhi son of Rajinder Gandhi, resident of 36 A/F, Phase-3, Beauty Avenue, Amritsar .....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Darshan Bishnoi, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petition has been rendered infructuous and seeks for permission to dismiss it. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 03, 2011 Pankaj*