IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 7709 of 2009 Between: Gujjula Korraju S/o. Gopayya R/o. Lingagudem, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Settlement Officer and Joint Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2 Sayed Anwarull S/o. Noorullah R/o. Chintalapudi Village and Mandal, West Godavari District. 3 Maddula Srinivasa Babu S/o. Ramakrishnarao Gondugolanu Village, Bhimadole Mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent not allowing the petitioner and other schedule tribe persons to implead through petition dated 24.1.2009 (P1) in the proceedings vide C.No.25/97/884/72B(FSO) Nellore & Roc/F1/6040/2007(FSO&JC) W.G., Eluru dt. 03.10.2008 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently directing the 1st respondent to receive the implead petition dated 24.1.2009 of the petitioner and other schedule tribe persons and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NARAM.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner and others filed an interlocutory application before the 1st respondent in un-numbered I.A.in Proceedings bearing C.No. 25/97/884/72B (FSO) Nellore & Roc/F1/6040/2007 (FSO & JC) WG, Eluru seeking their impleadment as respondents in the main proceedings. Aggrieved that the 1st respondent has not disposed of their application, this writ petition is filed. On instructions from the 1st respondent, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue states that the 1st respondent has not yet passed an order on the application of the petitioner and would consider and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. Recording the submission, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 24.6.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO. 7709 of 2009. Dated: 24.6.2009.