IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7321 of 2009 GEETA DEVI WIDOW OF LATE RAMA MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MAJHAURA, P.O. CHINAURAGANJ, BLOCK – JHANJHARPUR, P.S. JHANJHARPUR, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI Versus 1.THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PROVIDENT FUND, THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, SITAMARHI. 4. THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUB DIVISION, PUPRI, JANAKPUR ROAD, DISTRICT SITAMARHI. 5. THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, TIRHUT AREA BOARD, MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 2. 02.07.2009 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Tirhut Area Board, Muzaffarpur as respondent no. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the dues on account of Provident Fund and Group Saving Scheme have been sanctioned as contained in Annexure-4 and 5 but the sanctioned amount has not been as yet. Learned counsel for the respondent-Board submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be - 2 - considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance relating to other retiral dues, petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no. 5 . In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks alongwith certified copy of the present order, the respondent no. 5 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the payment of retiral dues could be redressed without further delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)