1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.547 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Shri Dinesh P. Karia ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.554 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Shri Ramkishor S. Khairari ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.555 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Smt.Sangeeta S. Khairari ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.558 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Sugnomal S. Kardia ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.563 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Dr.Surekha Chaudhary ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.565 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Smt.Amrita Sachanand Galani ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.567 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Harichand S. Moryani (HUF) ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.657 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane ..Appellant. Versus Smt.Parmeshwari H. Rajai ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.771 OF 2009 2 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. Versus Shri Kumarpal Surendra Shah ..Respondent. Mr.Bhatnagar i/by Mr.N.R. Prajapati for the appellant in all the matters. Mr.K. Gopal with Mr.Jitendra Singh for the respondent in ITXA 547, 565/09. Dr.Danial with Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent in ITXA No.554, 555, 567, 657/09 None for the respondent in ITXA No.558, 563/09. Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.Jas Sanghvi for the respondent in ITXA No.771/09. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd July, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Revenue and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents in all the matters. Perused record. 2. These appeals are directed against the order dated 1-6-2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal `H’ Bench, Mumbai, whereby the tribunal has held that the A.O. was not justified in making additions under Section 68 of the Act. It is not in dispute that the facts of these cases are identical to the facts in the case of CIT V/s. Uttamchand Jain being Appeal No.634 of 2009 decided on 2-7-2009 (unreported). In fact, the tribunal has relied upon its own decision in the case of Uttamchand Jain and decided the issue in favour of the respondent / assessee. 3. The appeal filed by the Revenue against the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Uttamchand Jain being Income Tax Appeal No.634 of 2009 is concerned, the same is dismissed by this Court as stated herein above by reasoned order dated 2-7-2009. As there is no dispute that the facts in these cases are identical with that of Uttamchand Jain’s case, the present appeals are also liable to be dismissed for the reasons recorded in our Judgment in the case of Uttamchand Jain (supra). 4. Needless to mention that the questions sought to be raised revolve around findings of fact which are recorded by the Tribunal after due appreciation of facts and circumstances of the case with which no fault can be found. In the result, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)