C.W.P. No. 2349 of 2007 Smt. Anjana Rani vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** The petitioner has challenged the appointments of respondents No.4, 5 and 6 as Anganwari workers. On the last date the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon the decision dated 01.06.2007 which has been placed before me today. It would be in the interst of justice if the said document is placed on record so that learned counsel for the petitoner can respond thereto. Additionally, learned counsel for the petitoner has relied upon the decision of CWP No.2659 of 2007 and according to himn,this judgment would cover the case in his favour. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for some time to enable him to go through the judgment in CWP No. 2659 of 2007. Adjourned to 6.3.2009.” Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to deny that the facts of this case are covered by the decision of this Court in CWP No. 2659 of 2007 decided on 13.12.2007. Disposed of in the same terms. Consequently the appointments of respondents No.4, 5 and 6 are quashed and respondents are directed to undertake fresh selections. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 06, 2009 sunita