IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31552 of 2011 Lachhu Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 21.09.2011. Heard. Regard being had to the fact that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased and also that except the informant all chargesheet witnesses have been examined, the court is not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail. Prayer is dismissed. The contention was that the investigating officer and the doctor who had held postmortem examination or had examined the injured have also not been examined. Besides, there is no information about the stage of the case and the progress made by the trial court in the counter case. Considering all these circumstances, let the trial court, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge-II, Aurangabad in Sessions Trial No.352 of 2010 make all efforts to conclude the hearing of the two cases as per the direction of this Court contained in order dated 23.12.2009 passed in 2 Cr.Misc.No.34396 of 2009 within a period of six months so as to delivering the judgment in both the cases. If the trial is not concluded the learned trial Judge shall have to submit an explanation to this Court and the petitioner shall have the liberty to renew his prayer for bail. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)