IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2007 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1928 WA.No. 633 of 2007() --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7/2007 Dated 10/01/2007 .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT IN THE WPC --------------------------------- MEENADOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MEENADOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 516, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.K.J.VINCENT RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER IN THE WPC ----------------------------------- TELECOM TOWER AND INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD., 45/256, C-19 SECOND FLOOR, MATHER SQUARE, OPP. NORTH RAILWAY STATION, COCHIN-682 018, REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE (SITE ACQUISITION AND ADMINISTRATION) MR. RAHUL DAS. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag.C.J. & M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO 633 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 15th day of March, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan,(Ag.C.J.) Issue raised in this writ appeal is already covered by a decision in Reliance Infocom Ltd. v. Chemanchery Grama Panchayat (2006 (4) KLT 695). In the circumstances, the learned Single Judge was justified in disposing the writ petition with a direction to the Panchayat to reconsider the petitioner’s application. We find no necessity to interfere with the finding of the learned Single Judge. Hence, the appeal lacks merit and it is dismissed. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-