IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16935 of 2011 Sarita Sharma, Wife of Late Deo Nath Kumar, resident of Village- Bara Hasan, Post- Bishunpur Pandey, Police Station-Meenapur, Via- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 4. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellant Tribunal, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Block Development Officer, Meenapur, (Kanti), District- Muzaffarpur. 7. The Block Education Extention Officer, Meenapur (Kanti) District- Muzaffarpur. 8. The Head Master, Government of Middle School, Bhelaee Pur at Meenapur, District- Muzaffarpur. 9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bara Bharti, Block & Police Station- Meenapur (Kanti), District- Muzaffarpur. 10. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Bara Bharti, Block & Police Station- Meenapur (Kanti), District- Muzaffarpur. ---------------------------------- 2. 27.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.C. to G.A. 10 for the State and its functionaries. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of the order of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Muzaffarpur dated 15.07.2011 in Case No. 166 of 2010, she is not being given appointment and consequential benefits. 2 Learned counsel submits that there was specific order allowing the petitioner to work and this order had to be implemented within 15 days but the same has not been done. Learned counsel further submits that there has been no challenge to the order dated 15.07.2011 but still the same is not being implemented. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court feels that the respondents are duty bound to obey the order dated 15.07.2011 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal which is the competent authority in such cases. The respondents cannot sit over the said order or refuse to implement the same. Accordingly, let the concerned, respondents ensure that the order is implemented forthwith and in any case within a maximum period of 15 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order upon them. All necessary formalities shall be completed expeditiously and the petitioner shall thereafter be entitled for all consequential benefits also. It is made clear that the order is being passed upon the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 15.07.2011 in Case 3 No. 166 of 2010 has attained finality and there has been no challenge to the same. With the aforesaid observations and directions this writ petition stands disposed off. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)