IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY , THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WP .NO:1662 of 2007 Between: Kumari Thakur Rithika D/o Bhagat Raj .... Petitioner AND 1 The Director, Backward Classes Welfare Department, Telugu Samkshema Bhavan, 6th Floor, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 500 028. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad Division, Hyderabad. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 5 The Director of Technical Education & Convenor, EAMECT-2006 (Admissions), Sanketika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 6 The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. 7 Mahaveer Institute of Science and Technology, Rep: by its Principal, Vyasapuri Colony, Bandlaguda Post, Keshavagiri, Hyderabad. ( R7 impleaded as per Court Order dated 22.10.2007 In WPMP.No.25260 of 2007.) .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the constitution praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus; to direct the Respondents to treat the petitioner as BC "A" for all particular purposes including pursuing her Engineering Course based on valid caste certificate issued by the 4th Respondent who is competent Authority by holding the action of the Respondents in doubting the caste status of the petitioner without any base and treating her as general candidate without conducting enquiry under Rule 1997 read with Section 5(1) of Act 1993 and Rules as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional. WPMP.No.2106 of 2007: Petition under Sectin151 of C.P.C praying that I the circumstances stated in affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to treat the petitioner belonging to “AGNIKU LASKHATRIYA (BC.-‘A’ ) based on for pursing Engineering course in 6th respondent college. For the petitioner: Sri Satish Deshpande, Advocate For the Respondents No.1 to 5 and 7: None For the Respondent No.6: Sri G. Venkat Reddy, Advocate for ‘ K. Rathangapani Reddy, Advocate THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER …2 Sd/- Y. GOPALAKRISHNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Director, Backward Classes Welfare Department, Telugu Samkshema Bhavan, 6th Floor, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 500 028. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad Division, Hyderabad. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 5 The Director of Technical Education & Convenor, EAMECT-2006 (Admissions), Sanketika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 6. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. 7. The Principal, Mahaveer Institute of Science and Technology, Vyasapuri Colony, Bandlaguda Post, Keshavagiri, Hyderabad. 8. Two CCs to the GP for Revenue , High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 9. Two CCs to the GP for Education , High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 10. Two CCs to the GP for Social Welfare, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 11. One CC to Sri K. Rathangapani Reddy , Advocate (OPUC) 12. One CC to Sri Satish Deshpande, Advocate (OPUC) 13. Two CD copies. RV HIGH COURT CVNRJ Dated 28.4.2011 ORDER WP.No.1662 of 2007 Dismissing the WPMP No.2106 of 2007 as Infructuous. Dismissing the WP and WPMP as infructuous without costs