IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1675 of 2009 1. BIRENDRA KUMAR, son of Sri Satyendra Prasad Narayan Singh, owner and resident of Flat No. 107 2. Umesh Prasad, son of late Ayodhya Prasad, owner and resident of Flat No. 106 3. Mrinal Kanti Chakravarty, son of late Dr. Ajit Bandhu Chakravarty, owner and resident of Flat No. 207 4. Udai Pratap Singh, son of late Surya Narain Singh, owner and resident of Flat No. 202 5. Smt. Meena Singh, wife of Dr. B.K.Singh, owner and resident of Flat No. 201 6. Smt. Uma Srivastava, wife of late J.K. Srivastava, owner and the resident of Flat No. 204 7. Bimal Srivastava, son of Sri Surendra Prasad Srivastava, owner and resident of Flat No. 302 8. Nigam Prakash Narain, son of late Hirdai Narain, owner and resident of Flat No. 102 9. Smt. Manorama Sinha, wife of Sri Gupteshwar Prasad Singh, owner and resident of Flat No. 101 10. Ram M. Jagwani, son of Sri M.K.Jagwani, owner and resident of Flat No. 304 All residents of ‘Pranjal Apartment’, West Boring Canal Road, P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna ... Appellants/Petitioners Versus 1. PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, through its Chairman 2. The Vice Chairman, Patna Regional Development Authority Both (1 & 2) having their offices at ‘Mauryalok Complex’, Dak Bunglow Road, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna ... (Respondents 1st set)-O.P. 1st set 3. Smt. Ragini Verma, W/o Sri Ajit Verma 4. Smt. Anjani Prasad, W/o Sri Shivnandan Prasad Both (3 & 4) residents of House No. 139/D, Srikrishnapuri, P.S. Srikrishnapuri, Town and District Patna ... (Respondents 2nd set)- O.P. 2nd set ----------- 3. 24.11.2010 In the opinion of this Court since the writ application in question has already been dismissed on the ground of its having 2 abated due to non-substitution of the writ petitioners, there would be no question of restoring the writ application, inasmuch as it was not dismissed for non-prosecution or for default. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Dismissal of this application, however, shall not stand in the way of the petitioners to seek any appropriate remedy as is available to them in law. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/