HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.22 of 2010 Dated: 11-02-2010 Between: Kalva Devadas & others. … Petitioners And The Church of South India Diocese of Dornakal, Dornakal, Warangal District, rep. by its Bishop & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.22 of 2010 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed, complaining non-disposal of I.A.No.370 of 2009 in O.S.No.97 of 2009 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Mahabubabad.. 2. The suit in O.S.No.97 of 2009 is filed with the following prayer: “A. that a Decree be passed against the Defendants 1 & 2, declaring the 33rd Statutory Dornakal Diocesan Council Meeting allegedly conducted from 6-30 p.m. on 4th November, 2009 and on 5th November, 2009 at Dornakal, as illegal null & void and the Defendants 1 and 2 are not entitled to send the delegates to the 32nd Session of the Church of South India Synod, scheduled from 14th January to 17th January 2010 at Kalaivanar Arangam, Next to Rock Hall and CSI Maruroopam (Transfiguration) Church, Courtallam, coming under the Diocese of Tirunelveli. B. that a Consequential Decree of Permanent Injunction be passed against the Defendants 1 & 2, restraining the Executive Committee to function as Elected Body and not to allow the delegates to participate in the 32nd Session of the Church of South India Synod, scheduled from 14th January to 17th January, 2010 at Kalaivanar Arangam, Next to Rock Hall and CSI Maruroopam (Transfiguration) Church, Courtallam, coming under the Diocese of Tirunelveli. C. that to award costs of the suit to the Plaintiffs; and D. that to grant such other better relief/s in favour of the Plaintiffs which the Hon’ble Court may deem it just and proper under the circumstances of the case.” 3. Pending the suit, I.A.No.370 of 2009 is filed under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2, seeking injunction orders, restraining respondents 1 and 2 from sending the delegates from Dornakal Diocesan Council, and also to restrain respondents 3 and 4 from allowing such delegates for participation in the meeting, which was to be held from 14th to 17th of January 2010. 4. This Court, on 12th January 2010, has ordered that the participation of delegates will be subject to the orders to be passed in the Civil Revision Petition. As much as the very revision is filed complaining non-disposal of I.A.No.370 of 2009, and in view of the fact that the meeting is already over, I dispose of this revision petition by observing that the participation of delegates in the meeting held from 14th to 17th January 2010, will be subject to the outcome of the suit in O.S.No.97 of 2009. 5. Subject to the above observation, the revision is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 11th February 2010 ajr