IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.784 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision August 05, 2011 Ajit Kumar …..Appellant Versus State of Haryana & others …..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. S.K. Biriwal, Advocate for the appellant. *** 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The appellant has been working as a guest Teacher on the basis of engagement letter. However on 22.07.2009, the respondent issued general instructions that the guest Lecturers may be continued as per available work. An exception has been carved out with regard to those who are indulging in indiscipline. The appellant could have been relieved on or after 31.03.2009. The case of the appellant is that he has not been allowed to mark presence despite instructions issued on 22.07.2009(P-4). There is a specific letter relieving the appellant from the service on 18.09.2009(P-6). Therefore, we find no legal infirmity in the view taken by the learned Single Judge holding that the appellant does not have any legal right to continue as a guest Teacher. The appeal is devoid of merits and does not warrant any interference of this Court. 2. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (ARVIND KUMAR) 05.08.2011 JUDGE vcgarg