1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3126 OF 2009 Shri Yashwant S. Yadav & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. The Taluka Inspector of Land Records, Kalyand & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.G.S.Godbole i/b. Ms.Neha P. Bhide for petitioners. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : MARCH 30, 2009. DATE : MARCH 30, 2009. DATE : MARCH 30, 2009. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. The order impugned in this Petition is dated 23rd November, 2007 which records the fact that the decree has been marked as fully satisfied in view of the stand taken by the decree holder as stated in purshis Exh. 58. The Petitioners assert that their predecessor in title had purchased land bearing Survey No. 118 Hissa No.25 from the predecessor of Judgment Debtor/decree holder. It is further asserted by the Petitioners that the said land was not subject matter of the suit in which decree was passed and has now been noted to be fully satisfied. This grievance cannot be considered in the present Writ Petition. If the Petitioners are so advised, 2 may take recourse to appropriate remedy to seek such declaration/clarification. Those proceedings will have to be decided on its own merit in accordance with the law. However, if the property purchased by the predecessor of the Petitioners from the predecessor of the Judgment Debtor and decree holder is the same as in the suit being Regular Civil Suit No.12 of 1979, then the Petitioners will have to proceed against the Judgment Debtor and decree holder for appropriate relief, as may be advised. 2. With this observation, present Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to take recourse to remedy, as may be advised, which will have to be decided on its own merit in accordance with law. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)