1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.222 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2659 OF 2005 Damayanti Amrutlal Gada. ...Plaintiff vs. 1. TPH Corporation & others. ...Defendants. --- Mr.P.M.Shah, for Plaintiff. None for Defendants. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 14th August, 2006. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for plaintiff states that the defendants are served. He undertakes to file affidavit of service. The defendants have not filed any application for leave to defend the suit within the time fixed by the provisions of Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, in terms 2 of the provisions of Order 37 of C.P.C. the plaintiff is entitled to a decree. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for plaintiff. Perused the record. The summons for judgment is granted. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause of the suit. Refund of court fees as per rules. ---