IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.557 of 2006 AMAR NARAYAN CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 5. 25.8.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order dated 28.4.2006 passed by F.T.C.-5, Darbhanga in Sessions Trial No. 222 of 1996. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State. It appears from the impugned order that the prosecution witness no. 12, I.O. has been discharged as the petitioner did not turn up for cross-examination in spite of repeated opportunities given to learned counsel for the defence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one opportunity should be given to the defence for cross-examination of the I. O as he is an important witness. Under the facts and circumstances, court below is directed to given one opportunity to the petitioner for cross- examination of P. W. 12 Mustaq Ahamad. For production of the witness the Court shall issue dasti summon and the same be handed over to the defence for production within one month of the receipt of this order failing which the court shall proceed to dispose of the case in accordance with law. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)