IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38266 of 2010(G) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. T.RAJAN, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.Y.THOMAS, VADAKKEKARA PUTHENVEEDU, KOTTANALLOOR MURI, MANAKKALA P.O., ERATHU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 2. ROSAMMA VARGHESE, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.T.RAJAN, VADAKKEKARA PUTHENVEEDU, KOTTANALLOOR MURI, MANAKKALA P.O., ERATHU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI. K.SHAJ, SRI.SAJJU.S. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR - 691 523. 3. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, ADOOR - 691 523. R1 TO R3 BYGOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No. 38266 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 19th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioners, aggrieved by Ext.P1 order issued by the 3rd respondent exercising his powers under the Land Conservancy Act, they filed Ext.P2 revision before the 1st respondent accompanied by Ext.P4 application for stay. It is stated that orders have not been passed and that in the meanwhile, the 3rd respondent is taking steps for implementing Ext.P1 by evicting the petitioners from the property mentioned therein. It is with these allegations, the writ petition is filed. Therefore, if the 1st respondent considers Ext.P2 revision filed by the petitioners keeping further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 in abeyance, the grievance of the petitioners will be redressed. 2. In that view of the matter, I direct that the 1st respondent shall pass orders on Ext.P2 revision filed by the petitioners with notice to them and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ W.P (C) No. 38266 of 2010 2 petition. It is directed that in the meanwhile, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 order of the 3rd respondent shall be kept in abeyance. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before respondents 1 and 3 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge W.P (C) No. 38266 of 2010 3