IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16155 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- HAMZAKUTTY.P.A,42 YRS,S/O.LATE BEERAN RAWTHER,PUTHUPARAMPIL VEEDU,VAIPUR.P.O,KOTTANGAL VILLAGE,MALLAPPILLY TALUK,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, REP;BY HIS P.A.HOLDER SHAMSUDEEN.C.S,43 YRS, S/O.LATESULAIMAN RAWTHER,CHERUKOPATHALIL HOUSE, VAIPUR.P.O,MALLAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA SRI.ANZAR BASHEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,PATHANAMTHITTA,PIN-689645. 2. TAHSILDAR,MALLAPPALLY TALUK, MALLAPPALLY.P.O,PIN-680584. 3. TALUK SURVEYOR,MALLAPPALLY TALUK, MALLAPPALLY,PIN-689584. SR GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16155 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE LOCAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT DATED 17.9.09 EXT.P2- TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DATED 5.2.10 EXT.P3- TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 16.3.10 FOR MEASURING OUT THE PROPERTY GIVEN TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................... W.P.(C).16155/2011 ....................... Dated this the 16th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the dispute raised by the local authority as to the alleged violation of the requirements under the Building Permit, the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 application before the third respondent for measurement of the property; which is stated as pending. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that necessary fees have also been remitted; despite which further steps are still to be pursued which made the petitioner to approach this Court for appropriate reliefs. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In the above circumstances, the third respondent is directed to consider Ext.P3 application and pass appropriate orders thereon, if the same is otherwise in order in all respects. Proceedings shall be finalized in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C).16155/11 2 5. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent for taking further steps. Writ petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs