1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2307/2011 Ashishkumar Ramvilas Kushwah -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 16.06.2011. Heard Shri A.I. Sheikh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.S. Sonare, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Basic contention is, constitution of respondent no.2 Committee is bad. Support is being taken from the earlier adjudication by this Court. Learned A.G.P. appearing for respondents, points out that the petitioner has migrated to State of Maharashtra in the year 2000 and prior to that he was residing in State of Uttar Pradesh. According to him, 2 therefore, controversy is covered by the Full Bench judgment of this Court reported at 2010 (2) Mh.L.J. 904 (Shweta Santalal Lal .vrs. State of Maharashtra and others). As the petitioner has migrated to State of Maharashtra after the cut off date, it is clear that the respondent no.2 is not competent to consider his entitlement. Hence, without going into the question of composition of respondent no.2 Committee, the petition is, therefore, not entertained and is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to take such steps as are available in law. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a student of engineering course, status quo as on today shall continue to operate for a period of 6 weeks from today and shall cease to operate automatically thereafter. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd