IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.P. NO. 348 OF 2004 Kishor M. Tupe ... Petitioner . VS. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer & ors. ... Respondents Mr. A. J. Ahuja for petitioner Mr. D.A. Patil AGP for respondents CORAM: D. G. KARNIK J. DATE: 23rd November, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the parties. Learned AGP points out that the order of which breach is alleged is complied with. In para 5 of the affidavit in reply the delay has been explained. 2. I am satisfied that the delay in implementation of the order was not deliberate and the explanation given in para 5 of the affidavit in reply is accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner also admits that the order has been complied with. 3. In the circumstances it is not necessary to take action in the contempt. Accordingly contempt petition disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK J.)