IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.355 of 2009 LAGANDEO SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 31.08.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The submission is for an appropriate direction to the CID, Bihar, to expeditiously conclude further investigation of Bidupur P. S. Case No. 126 of 2007. Counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that chargesheet has been submitted against some of the accused but not against the petitioners and neither has cognizance been taken against them differing with the chargesheet. Counsel for the State points out, that the petitioners are also named accused in the FIR. Be that as it may, this Court is satisfied that on the own showing of the petitioners, the writ application appears to be misconceived inasmuch as while chargesheet has been submitted against some of the co-accused no cognizance has been taken against the petitioners much less chargesheeted. There is no occasion for anxiety for the petitioners for expeditious conclusion of the investigation at this stage. The writ application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)