IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4396 of 2011 DR.HEM SEN KUMAR MANDILWAR, SON LATE UGRA SEN KUMAR MANDILWAR, RESIDENT OF A-131 HOUSING COLONY, NEAR PANCH SHIV MANDIR, KANKARBAGH, POLICE STATION KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 4. THE AUDITOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE AUDITOR, FOR THE STATE OF BIHAR, POSTED AT TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY,BHAGALPUR. 6. THE PRINCIPAL, P.B.S. COLLEGE,BANKA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 9.3.2011. Heard Shri Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 5/Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and also Shri Vikas Kumar, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General, who appears on behalf of the respondent no.1/State. The petitioner, who superannuated with effect from 31.1.2005 from the post of Professor (Chemistry) from P.B.S. College, Banka, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of retiral dues in view of U.G.C. scale (revised pay scale) and further to pay (a) Arrear of Earn Leave of 193 days, (b) Arrear of un deposited 2 Provident fund, (c) calculate the pension on the basis of period of service of 34 years and pay the arrear amount, (d) Arrear of difference amount of salary as per U.G.C. scale (revised pay scale) from July 1982 to 31 January, 2005 and (e) Arrear amount of 50% merger of D.A. with statutory interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed representation before the authority concerned. However, no decision has been taken till date. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/Vice Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, respondent no.2 is directed to 3 pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)