IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.18592 of 2001 Between: 1 Aizza College of WEngineering & Technology Rep. by its Secretary, Mahboob Alam Khan. Mulkulla, Mancheryal, Adilabad District. 2 Madrasa-I-Aizza, Rep. by its Secretary, Mahaboob Alam Khan. New Malkpet, Hyderabad. 3 Mahaboobv Alam Khan, S/o.Nawab Shah Alam Khan, R/o.Barkatpura, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Convenor, Admissions, EAMCET, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of the1st respondent in issuing GO Rt.No.1011 dated 2912-2000 as being without jurisdication apart from being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and quash the same and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3160 of 2002 Between: 1 Lincon's Educational Society, Rep.by its President Amol Raj, S/o. Vara Prasad, R/o. Kissan Nagar, Nizamabad. 2 Newton Institute of Engineering, Rep.by President AnandRaj, S/o. R/o.Kissanngar, Nizamabad. Macherla, Guntur. 3 Amol Raj S/o. Vara Prasad R/o.Kissanngar, Nizamabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Govt. of A.P. Education Dept., Rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Technical EDUCATION, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Conenor, Admission , EAMCET, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order direction or wirt particularly one in the nature of writ of ''Mandamus'' declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing GO Rt.No.1011 dt: 29/12/2000 as being without jurisdiction apart from bring illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and quash the same and further declare the action of the respondents in retaining part of the collected fees for payment to 'SONET' as illegal and unconstitutional and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3161 of 2002 Between: 1 Ellenki Educational Society Rep by its Secretary. E.Dayakar Reddy. S/o. E.Madhav Reddy R/o. 66, HIG , KPHB Coolony Hyderabad. 2 Ellenki College of Engg & Techology Rep by its Secretary. E.Dayakar Reddy. Siddipet, Medak District. 3 E.Dayakar Reddy S/o. E.Madhav Reddy R/o. 66, HIG , KPHB Coolony, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Govt of A.P., Rep By Its Principal Secretary, Education Department , Secretariat Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Technical Education Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Convenor Admissions , EAMCET, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing GO Rt No.1011 Dt: 29-12-2000 as being without Jurisdiction apart from being , illegal , arbitrary and Unconstitutional and quash the same and further declare the action of the respondent in retaining part of the collected fees for payment to 'SONET' as illegal and UnConstitutional and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.6305 of 2002 Between: 1 Tarakarama Educational Society Rep. by its Chairman N Raja Babu, S/o. Seethaiah R/o. G2, SBI colony, Bagh Ambertpet, Hyderabad. 2-2-185/89/1 Ramakrishna Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 2 Ramappa Engineering College Mahabubabad, Warangal District Rep. by its Chairman N. Raja Babu S/o. Seethaiah, Aged 40 yrs R/o. G2, SBI Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. 3 Ravi Rishi Educational Society 1-1-650/24 Gandhinagar, Hyderabad Rep. by its Secretary N. Manjusha W/o. N. Ramesh Babu, aged 30 yrs R/o. G2, SBI Colony, Bagh Ambertpet, Hyderabad. 4 Sant Samart Engineering College Bandlaguda, Khalsa village, Hyderabad,rep. by its Secretary N. Manjusha W/o. N. Ramesh Babu, aged 30 yrs R/o. G2, SBI Colony, Bagh Ambertpet, Hyderabad. 5 Karshak Vidya Parishad 1-9-36/1 Ravindra Nagar Colony, Habsiguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary N.Raja Babu, S/o. Seethaiah aged 40 yrs, r/o. G2, SBI colony, Bagh Ambertpet, Hyderabad. 6 Karshak Engineering College, Bowenpally Secunderabad Rep. by its Secy N. Raja Babu S/o. Seethaiah, aged 40 yrs, R/o. G2, SBI Colony, Bagh Ambertpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Govt of A.P. Education Dept., Rep. by its Prl. Secretary Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Convenor, Admissions, EAMCET, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 Society for Networking for Excellence in Technical Education o/o. the Commissioner, Department of Technical Education D-Block, V&VI Floors, BRKR Govt Offices Complex, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing GO Rt No. 1011 dated 29-12-2000 as being without jurisdiction apart from being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and quash the same and further declare the action of the respondents in deducting part of the collected fees for payment to 'SONET' as illegal and unconstitutional and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION Nos.18592 of 2001, 3160 of 2002 3161 of 2002 and 6305 of 2002 COMMON ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw these writ petitions. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 24-06-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}