CWP No.2182 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.2182 of 2010 Date of Decision: 08.02.2010 **** Rupali . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab and others . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Dr. M.L. Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to issue appointment letter to her for the post of Punjabi Mistress. It is claimed that the petitioner is at Serial No.78 of the revised merit list dated 03.11.2008 (Annexure P5) and the candidates lower in merit have already been appointed. It is the petitioner’s case that candidate upto Serial No.111 in the merit list have already got appointments, whereas she has not been offered the same despite a representation dated 26.11.2009 (Annexure P6). CWP No.2182 of 2010.doc - 2 – (2). After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner for her appointment and if the plea taken by her were to be true, issue the necessary orders as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (3). Ordered accordingly. (4). Dasti . (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 08.02.2010 vishal shonkar