IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14629 of 2008 Between: 1.Singavarapu Lakshmi, W/o. Surappalu, Hindu, R/o. Seripeta Village, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District, (Ward Member of Gram Panchayat Seripeta). 2.Pyla Appayyamma, W/o. Swaminaidu, Hindu, R/o. Seripeta Village, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District, (Ward Member of Gram Panchayat Seripeta). 3.Pilla Narayana Rao, S/o. Appalanaidu, Hindu, R/o. Seripeta Village, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District, (Ward Member of Gram Panchayat Seripeta). 4.Pilla Chandra Rao, S/o. Chinnanaidu, Hindu, R/o. Seripeta Village, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District, (Ward Member of Gram Panchayat Seripeta). ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Vizianagaram. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Vizianagaram. 3 The Sarpanch, Seripeta Gram Panchayat, Seripeta, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 and 2 in not passing any orders on the representation made by the petitioners on 28- 4-2008 against the high handed action of the 3rd respondent in diverting the funds of Indiramma Gruha Pathakam for constructing her house in the Government land situated in Seripeta Village and Gram Panchayat, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District as being illegal, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.E.V.BHAGIRATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.14629 of 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. Since the representation made by the petitioners, dated 27.04.2008, is pending consideration before the respondents 1 and 2, without expressing any opinion as to the allegations made by the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2, to make necessary enquiry pursuant to the representation of the petitioners, dated 27.04.2008, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the third respondent to rebut the allegations. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _______________ 09.07.2008 VGB