1 W.P. 9529.2011 - [ J ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9529 OF 2011 Santoshi Mata Mahila Bachat Gat Bhausaheb Nagar, Taluka Newasa, Dist. : Ahmednagar, Through its President Smt. Alka Chilu Kamble. ..... PETITIONER V E R S U S 1. State of Maharashtra Through Secretary Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. Deputy Commissioner ( Supply), Ahmednagar. 3. District Supply Officer, Ahmednagar. 4. Tuljai Mahila Swaya Swayatta Bachat Gat, Bhausaheb Nagar, Through its President, Smt. Savita Chandrakant Darandale. ..... RESPONDENTS Mr. S.S.Jadhawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.B.Choudhari, Addl. Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. R.M.Pardeshi, Advocate for Resp. No. 4. 2 W.P. 9529.2011 - [ J ] CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 14/12/2011. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. The Appeal of the petitioner came to be allowed by the Dy. Commissioner [ supply ] vide its Order dated 08/06/2011. Pursuant thereto, the District Supply Officer issued licence to the petitioner on 23/06/2011. The present respondent no. 4 preferred Revision before the Hon’ble Minister. On 19/10/2011, the Hon’ble Minister stayed the order passed by the Dy. Commissioner [ supply ]. The said order is assailed in the present Writ Petition. 3. Heard Mr. S.S.Jadhavar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K.B.Choudhari, the learned Additional Govt. Pleader for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. R.M. Pardeshi, the learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 4. On perusal of record, it transpires that after the Dy. Commissioner [ supply ] had passed the order granting allotment of shop 3 W.P. 9529.2011 - [ J ] in favour of the petitioner, the District Supply Officer issued licence on 23/06/2011. When the said order is already executed and implemented, the order thereafter could not have been stayed by ad-interim order. The Revision is still pending. The legality and validity of the order of the Dy. Commissioner [ supply ] can be gone into at the time of the final determination of the said Revision. At an intergnum, the said order of stay could not have been passed when the said order is already implemented. 5. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 19/10/2011 is quashed and set aside. 6. The Hon’ble Minister shall endeavour to dispose of the Revision on its own merits as expeditiously as possible. I have not observed anything on the merits of the matter. 7. Rule is accordingly made absolute. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/W.P. 9529.2011 - [ J ] 4 W.P. 9529.2011 - [ J ]