IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10950 of 2009 UPENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.5.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections366,366A and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that the co-accused are alleged to have abducted the victim when the petitioner is alleged to have married her. He submits that the marriage was solemnized in pressure of the father of the victim as stated in the FIR itself. Other co-accused who are alleged to have abducted for purposes of marriage have been granted bail, details whereof are mentioned in paragraph 18 of the bail application. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Forbesganj P.S. case No. 173 of 2008. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar