IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 4359 of 2008(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.R.RESHMI, W/O.S.SUDHEER, KOTTURETTU HOUSE, KATTOOKARA, THIRUVALLA (UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, DEVASWOM BOARD HIGH SCHOOL, PARUMALA). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKARA. 4. CORPORATE MANAGER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOLS, OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. SRI. K.N. VENUGOPALA PANICKER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.4359 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks regularisation of her appointment as a leave substitute against a permanent regular vacancy in accordance with Ext.P6 Government order. Seeking this relief, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 representation before respondents 1 and 2. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd