IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20254 of 2009 SUBHASH CHANDRA RAUSHAN @ SUBHASH RAI @ PAPPU Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is no scope of considering the petitioner’s involvement on merit on the ground that F.I.R. was against unknown and no material is there. Petitioner is said aged about 14 years at the time of occurrence. So, he needs better treatment and that is possible only after assessment of the age from the Court below where the case is pending, thereafter to seek appropriate relief of bail from the Juvenile Justice Board. With such observation, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)