IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11446 of 2009 Urmila Sinha, widow of Late Bhagwat Prasad Karn, resident of Village-Mahmuda, P.S.- Islampur, District-Nalanda, at present residing at Government Quarter, Govt. Hospital Bak More, OBRA P.S. OBRA, District-Aurangabad....Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Home(Police) Government of Bihar, Old. Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Director General-cum-Inspetor General of Police,Bihar,Patna. 3. The Additional Director General of Police, Wireless, Bihar,Patna. 4. The Inspector General of Police, Wireless, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Deputy Inspector General, Wireless, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Superintendent of Police, Wireless, Patna. 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ........Respondents. ----------- 2. 04. 09. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that 90% Gratuity amount has been sanctioned and remained 10% has been withheld without any valid reason. Besides above, Rs. 49, 761/- has also been withheld on account of alleged excess salary drawn by the husband of the petitioner. The third grievance of the petitioner is that department did not sanction benefit of A.C.P. of her late husband. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that a representation was filed on 19. 03. 2009, as contained in Annexure-2, but the same has remained unconsidered. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a fresh representation stating details of her claim, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of her pending claim, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent - 2 - No.4. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant document in support of her claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 4 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievance of the petitioner could be settled without delay. With the above observations/directions, this writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)