IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA L.P.A. No. 156 of 2011 Date of decision: July 20, 2011 State of H.P. and others Appellants Versus Dev Kali Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the Appellants: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Sood, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. For the Respondent: Mr. R.D. Kaundal, vice counsel ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) State has come in appeal against the judgment, dated 5th April, 2010. It is seen that the learned Single Judge though observed that the case is covered by the decision of Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P. and others, a direction was issued to confer the work charge status on the basis of the decision in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Vs. State of H.P. and others 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316. It is made clear that the private respondent, being Nepali citizen, the judgment that would be applicable to her will be either Man Singh Vs. State of H.P. or Phool Maya 2 Vs. State of H.P. and others. Subject to the above clarification, the appeal is disposed of. The pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Copy dasti. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice July 20, 2011 (K) ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), Judge