w: 3);? 25£//_ 3g @Zf E @H‘mg‘g IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. '3‘ /9 2-/2009 1. Vijendra Singh Thakur S/o Rajendra Singh Thakur Aged about 28 years Pcndra D1stt — Bllaspur (C G ) 2 Sanjay Kumar Rathore S/ o shn Padum Lal Rathore Bacharwar Near at Society Pendra Dist Bilaspur (CG) PETITIONERS VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. f State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaly Department of Heigher Edution, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building Raipur C.G. ' State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Ayurved Yoga & Natural Therapy,Yunani Siddha 85 Homeo (Ayush) Mantralay, D K S Bhawan Ralpur C G 3.. Reg‘strar, Neta ji Subhash Chand Bose i 2,. Computer Gramin i Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur C.G. 4. Principal, Chouksey i Ayurved ‘ Compounder Prashikshin Kendra near Ajad Chouk Pendra, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. w 01. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As stated above in cause title. {A ’ M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition {S} No. 7192 of 2009 Pétitioners Respond€nts State, of Chhattisgarh 6a othars Vijendra Singh Thakur 85 another Versus (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’blo Shri Satish K. Agnjhotn' J.) Shri A. V. Shn‘dhar, Advocats for the potitioners. Shri N‘ N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 & 2. O RD E R {oral} ( Passed on thls 22nd day ofJanuary, 20 10 ) Heard. Lealtned counsel appealing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners seek permission of this Couzt to withdraw this petition with iiberty to take appropriate steps as provided. under provisions of law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. CO with the above-stated liberty, if so advised. r sax— ‘aaushK Agn‘imtr‘ " z v‘ Juage In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn n, r,— Y Thakur 7 ,