IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1735 of 2008 KUNTI DEVI Versus RAMAMKANT TIWARY & ORS ----------- 2 24.10.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, a ground of illness of a lawyer ought to have been taken as sufficient ground for recall of the witnesses as prayed for by the petitioner before the Court below. That being so, the impugned order is set aside and the witness sought to be examined by the petitioner would be recalled for his cross-examination but the petitioner will also be under obligation to examine such witnesses when they would appear before this Court. Any further lache on the part of the petitioner in this respect will however, be not condoned by the Court below and the concerned witnesses on recall would stand discharged if they are not cross examined by the counsel for the petitioner on the day they appear in the court for their further cross examination. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this civil revision application is allowed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)