W17 C9 “45 9/ (b N Q16 o.A. o. ‘d O G 9 3 hobh ath ate}. S N p ‘ ISS WU The state of Madhya Prah nd 2 othe a 0 GOQ 1999 APPLCA INT RL’SMWENE nrticar of th Appin Sbh Hth al s/o 3hr: Raghura patel. ged abui; 58 years’ Aarltu m goe f Gaea ln B , ue P. snur M ‘_ det o lg ubgwah' o fce Mg. gAxLs‘ OF AFPLICAT: ON glT 1 auls e lcat n ho a ?te, i A o eni gricultur'eveloent efficere sor Aebpm culre Departent, vernmnt o Madhya Pradesh, url Deveoyant lock No. 2 Garla 0u Bila (.P.) K Resin f : vilae Da Pst ofi auanj Dir REWA w) stict hy. 2.‘ icl f e esnden : o a eh, hrough g Tho Secretary, . governmemt of Ma%ya Pradesh, Agriculture Department, o macmya praaesh‘,’ Vs a c p A L. The Dimctm. Agriculture Department, z Madhyu Pra&e5h, B \H‘ O P A L-u 3. E‘h'e D‘eg'utywnirector Agricultuxe, Ma$1ya 9radesh. BILASPUR (mm) 3. Particuars of the orcier a ainst which the a. lication _s ma e a e 1) order No. Dated Passed. by‘ Subject in brief .gw'v Au1-3/235/86/14-1 g 15.7:1987 Director of r Agriculture V Reseondent No.2 : Promotion of his juniors ané exclusion of applicant's promotion / (gnnexure 3-3) < ,Q /4/W@ I§ THE M.P. STATE ADIVENISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL EKT Jik‘BALI’UR d'es @ rs ‘ Partuars b th Rpots 1 ihe State of Mdhya Prads’ T l g’ g —ET " " ‘ ' W mm . .w.i2[;.2nz.a:..z£m ‘ai 200? E a man WW mm Wmmm WW WW %W 31ml SB: HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOIjAN SHRIVASTAVA, J. 12.01.2010 When the matter was called ow fcr hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was passec over. EVen in the second round, none appears for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the resp ondents/State. The petition was filed aggrieved on account of non-promotion of the petitioner. In the return, it has been st ed that earlier the petitioner was compulsorily retired on 02.06.1989 af r holding the departmental enquiry which was challenged before the Trbunal and the Tribunal vide order dated 15.05.1998 set aside the order of compulsory retirement. Thereafter, the petitioner was reinstat d vide order dated 26.04.1999 and his seniority has also been rectified de order dated 12.05.2000. ln the return, it has also been stated that as per the entitlement of the petitioner, it has been decided to place his se in circulation of Departmental Promotion Committee (for short the ‘ .P.C.’) for considering his case for O promotion to the post of Senior Agri ultural Development Officer and as soon as he is considered for promoton, he will be given benefit on the basis of the recommendation of the D P.C. Considering the facts and circu stances of the case and grievanc‘e raised in the petition and also the tatement made in the return, this xpetition is dismissed for want of pr secution. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive if grievan e wholly or in part still subsists. ,// A copy of this order be sent to he petitioner. 3 r‘vaS‘ \ [draw