Stay Vac. App. 934 / 09 Urgency App. 1132 / 10 In C-482 No. 54 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate present for respondent. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.10.2008, passed by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway) Haldwani, in Criminal Case No. 468 of 2008. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit on record. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent got married to petitioner on 29.03.2007. It is pleaded by her that the respondent was forced to live in her parental house. She has filed a criminal case relating to dowry harassment, and another under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for maintenance. The impugned case appears to have been filed by the respondent under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Magistrate passed the order directing the petitioner not to transfer the property owned by the petitioner in Bombay. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the impugned order was passed by the Magistrate under Section 18 read with Section 26 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which is appealable under Section 29 of said Act. Since, appeal is provided against the impugned order, this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., is not maintainable. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed with the observation that the petitioner may file the appeal before the Sessions Judge, Nainital. Interim order dated 20.01.2009 stands automatically vacated. (Both Stay Vacation Application No. 934 of 2009 as well as Urg No. 1132 of 2010 stand disposed of). ency Application (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 26.03.2010 HN