y \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No. Io460F 2004/ Bipul Kumar Shukla, S/O. Shri Bhaiyalal Shukla, Aged about 32 years, Presently posted and working as Head Constable, Police Station Orchha, Police Disttict Narayanpur, District Bastar (C.G.). PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India through the Secretary, Department of wwy Personnel, Public Grievance and “ .. 7 . $233 TIEldafl°§Zgi21€ Nié’eai Delhi. 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Director General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). - M ‘0i Inspector General of Police Clem to A I gllasput (Personnel), Police Head Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 6. Superintendent of Police, DistriCt Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.). 7. Superintendent of Police Police District : Nara anpur District Bastar WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (M M XLHC-22 Shri VmJay Hant, Sr Standing Counsel With $hn V V S Murthy, Addl Standmg Co 'Shri Akhil Ag‘awal, Panel Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarh and its o None for respondent 0.2. Service to respondent No.2 is not required as no relief i claimed from it. Service to it is dispensed with. Application for urgent Heard By this petition under Anicle 226/277 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has ubmitted that though he has been allocated to the State of M dhya Pradesh but he is not being relieved. Counsel for petitio er relied on judgment ofthis Court iii W.P.No.516/2003 (Dr. A hok. Kumar Jain & Ors. vs State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) dated 17. 12.2003 copy of whichlhas been filed along with the petitio disputed by the other side. Having consideréd t on record and in view of th the legal position, tl'le acti relieving the petitioner mnn‘ \entitled for relieving. sel for Umon of India. hearing is allowed. .9" counsel for the petitioner as Annexure P—6. This &ct is not facts and ciroumstances, material judgment cited above and further n of the State authorities in not at be sustained and the petitioner is _ [1% éfae m ' h feaiEH 311%31 mm Accordingly, the petiii n is allowed and the respondents are directed to relieve the pe tioner. Leamed counsel for e Unio of India submits that elections are going on and lection process will continue upto 20.05. 2004. In the circumstances, t is directed that the petitioner be relieved immediately after 05.2004 and in any ease before 3 1.05.2004. , With this observation, petition is disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. 0360/2004 for/interim relief also stand disposed of. Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge [dew n