IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2511 of 2010 Manish Rai @ Manish Yadav, son of Jagdish Rai, resident of Village-Chapra Bahas, P.S.-Sugauli, District-East Champaran. …….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 22. 03. 2010. Heard Mr Binod Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sagauli P.S. Case No. 41 of 2007, instituted under Sections 363/366A of the Indian Penal Code. According to the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant for the purpose of the marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that victim girl has voluntarily married with the petitioner and they are living together as husband and wife. It is further submitted that from their wedlock a child was born. To buttress the submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention towards marriage certificate vide Annexure-2 issued under the provision of Special Marriage Act. He has also drawn my attention towards portion of the impugned order passed by the learned Sessions Judge to show that as a matter of fact, the victim girl was present in the court with a baby in her lap. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed 2 the aforesaid position. Be that as it may, petitioner , namely, Manish Rai @ Manish Yadav, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, in connection with Sagauli P.S. Case No. 41 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)