BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fourth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13624 of 2011 1. K. RAMAN 2. ATHANULLAH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDS Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DT CR NO.72/2011 ... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.72 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 406, 420, 120(b), 471, 465, 468 and 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the de-facto complainant owned a landed property in Attur Village. Admittedly, he mortgaged the said property to the first accused. Accordingly, he was in possession and enjoyment of the said property. Subsequently, when the de-facto complainant demanded the first accused to surrender possession, he declined. Thereafter, a written sale agreement was executed by the de- facto complainant to the first accused in respect of the very same property and the said document is also registered document, Now, the allegation is that deposit the same, the de-facto complainant has not been paid money by the accused. All these accused were joint together, is the further allegation. 3. Having regard to the fact that the property was, admittedly, mortgaged to the first accused, also the fact that the subsequently sale agreement is also registered and all other attendant circumstances I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 am., for a period of eight weeks without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. sd/- 04/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DT 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.38272 GH : 08.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13624 of 2011 Date :04/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/