1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.254 OF 2005 Sudam Karbhari Kale .. Petitioner. Vs. Bhausaheb Pandharinath Thete & Others .. Respondents. Mr.Ramesh Dubey Patil for the petitioner. Mr.R.A.Rajeshirke for respondent nos.1 and 2. Ms.M.M.Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 6th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 6th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 6th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the letter dated 18th January, 2005 issued by the Law and Judiciary Department, Government of Maharashtra, addressed to the Additional Public Prosecutor, Nasik informing him that the Government did not consider the judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No.107 of 2004 to be a fit case for filing the appeal. The revision application against such letter is not tenable. It is, therefore, disposed of as not tenable. It is open for the petitioner to adopt appropriate remedy, if any, available in law for redressal of his grievances. The revision application is, accordingly, disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)