IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6421 of 2010 Between: Sri Vidya Degree College, Khammam District. … Petitioner And Kakatiya University, Warangal & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri A. Santosh Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6421 of 2010 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in allotting students of the petitioner - college to respondent No.2 - college for the purpose of writing annual examinations for the year 2010 without conducting inspection as to the infrastructural facilities available in respondent No.2 – college, as illegal and arbitrary. When this writ petition came up for hearing on 22.03.2010, this Court passed the following order: “Pending further orders, respondent No.1 is directed to take necessary steps to ensure that the students of the petitioner – college, who are allotted to respondent No.2 – college for writing examinations, are provided with proper amenities, such as, comfortable sitting arrangements, supply of water, availability of toilets etc. It is made clear that any deficiency in the above arrangements on the part of respondent No.1 will be viewed seriously by this Court.” At the hearing, Sri A. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submitted that in view of the abovementioned order, respondent No.1 has taken satisfactory measures in providing facilities to the students of the petitioner – college, who are writing the examinations in respondent No.2 – college. He further submitted that there are three more examinations left and that respondent No.1 may be directed to continue the same facilities for the said examinations. Having heard the learned Standing counsel for respondent No.1, I am of the view that respondent No.1 shall continue to provide the same facilities as are extended hitherto till completion of the examinations. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.8282 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 07.04.2010 ES