IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2006 IN IN IN LPA ST. NO.5499 OF 2006 LPA ST. NO.5499 OF 2006 LPA ST. NO.5499 OF 2006 M/s.M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant M/s.M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant M/s.M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant Vs. Vs. Vs. Mahesh Lalchand Bhatia & Anr. ...Respondents Mahesh Lalchand Bhatia & Anr. ...Respondents Mahesh Lalchand Bhatia & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2006 IN IN IN LPA ST. NO.5501 OF 2006 LPA ST. NO.5501 OF 2006 LPA ST. NO.5501 OF 2006 M/s. M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant M/s. M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant M/s. M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant Vs. Vs. Vs. Suresh Moolchand Narwani & Anr. ...Respondents Suresh Moolchand Narwani & Anr. ...Respondents Suresh Moolchand Narwani & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.73 OF 2006 IN IN IN LPA ST. NO.5503 OF 2006 LPA ST. NO.5503 OF 2006 LPA ST. NO.5503 OF 2006 M/s. M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant M/s. M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant M/s. M.S.Patel & Co. ...Appellant Vs. Vs. Vs. Lal Bhagwandas Tolani & Anr. ...Respondents Lal Bhagwandas Tolani & Anr. ...Respondents Lal Bhagwandas Tolani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Sanjay Udeshi, Advocate for Appellant Mr.Sanjay Udeshi, Advocate for Appellant Mr.Sanjay Udeshi, Advocate for Appellant Mr.Vinod Tayade, Advocate for Respondents Mr.Vinod Tayade, Advocate for Respondents Mr.Vinod Tayade, Advocate for Respondents CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 11TH DECEMBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. All these three Applications are in three 1. All these three Applications are in three 1. All these three Applications are in three different LPAs for condonation of delay. Learned Advocate different LPAs for condonation of delay. Learned Advocate different LPAs for condonation of delay. Learned Advocate for the Respondents has no objection for delay for the Respondents has no objection for delay for the Respondents has no objection for delay condonation. Delay condoned as satisfactorily explained. condonation. Delay condoned as satisfactorily explained. condonation. Delay condoned as satisfactorily explained. 2. Copy of the LPAs to be served upon the 2. Copy of the LPAs to be served upon the 2. Copy of the LPAs to be served upon the Respondents. Respondents. Respondents. . S.O to 9th January, 2007. . S.O to 9th January, 2007. . S.O to 9th January, 2007. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)