IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1402 of 2002 S.M.RAI SAXENA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 4. 18.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed in this case stating therein that the order of this Court has been complied with and admissible payment has been made to the petitioner and the claim, which has not been allowed, the petitioner was communicated of the same as per letter No.202 dated 5.3.2002 (Annexure B). In view of the fact that the order of this Court has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that with respect to the claim for salary for the period the service of the petitioner was extended by six months after the date of his superannuation, the petitioner proposes to challenge the aforesaid order (Annexure B). The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)