IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.28292 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 08, 2011 Gurdial Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Manvinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The reasons for which the trial has not been concluded so far have now been provided by the trial Court. Though there is some delay which can be attributed to the court dealing with the case, but the main reason for delay is the legal issues that arose during the course of trial. At one stage, the prosecution had made an application for summoning the additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., which accordingly was required to be dealt with and, thus, consumed some time. Subsequently, a criminal revision was filed before this Court against accused Parminder Kaur which remained pending till 2.5.2009. This was another reason or a cause for delay. Now application has also been filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the prosecution to produce complete enquiry file, which is also being considered and adjudicated. The case is now fixed for prosecution evidence. In the circumstances of the case, no specific directions are required to be issued for expediting the trial. However, it is expected from the trial Court to take up this case, which is pending for quite some time and to finish it with some speed. Dismissed. December 08, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE