1 # % 03.01.2011 Present: Mr. Rabin Majumdar and Mr. Manish Pathak, Advs. for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Gupta, APP for the State along with SI Rakesh Sharma, P.S. Malviya Nagar. Mr. Hemant Gupta, Adv. for respondent no. 2 along with Mr. Sanujit Misra, POA of respondent no.2. + Crl. M.C. 3896/2010 * Respondent no. 2 had filed a complaint in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi praying therein that petitioners be summoned, tried and punished for having committed offences under Sections 406/409/420/34 IPG. FIR in question was registered against the petitioners under Sections 406/409/420 IPG pursuant to the directions of the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 156(3) Gr.P.G. Petitioner no.l was ex employee of respondent no.2. Petitioner no.2 is wife of petitioner no.l. It was alleged that while in employment, petitioner no.l had misappropriated funds of respondent no.2 by transferring it in the account of proprietorship firm of which petitioner no.2 was the proprietor. Petitioners and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes amicably before the District Judge-V during the hearing of Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified anticipatory bail application on 24^^ November, 2009. Entire settled amount of ?4.40 lakhs has already been paid by the petitioners to respondent no. 2 receipt whereof, has been acknowledged by the Attorney of respondent no.2, who is present in the Court. In view of the settlement, respondent no.2 has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. In view of above facts, in the larger interest, FIR No. 404/2008 under Sections 406/409/420 IPC registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. JANUARY 03, 2011 ga A.K. PATHAK, J.