1 22 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3320/2008. LRs of late Shri Ram Karan Vs. Civil Judge (J.D.), Rajgarh &Anr. Date of Order :: 21st May 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. G.R. Punia, for the petitioners. ..... BY THE COURT: After attempting to argue the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners shall stand advised to take resort to appropriate remedies for the purpose of setting aside of abatement and condonation of delay by moving appropriate application/s and, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with the liberty for the petitioners to take resort to the appropriate remedies. So far withdrawal of this writ petition is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners has rightly chosen the course not to proceed with this writ petition any further in view of the specific remedies available in law which ought to have been taken to resort to for setting aside of abatement and for condonation of delay by making out a case therefor before the court concerned. Therefore, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn. 2 So far granting of any liberty is concerned, no observations are requisite in this case because it is always open for the petitioners to take resort to the appropriate remedies in accordance with law and if such remedies are taken resort to, it is for the court concerned to consider the submissions and the prayers in accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/