WIRE AT PARTY’S COSTS To 1. THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KADAPA. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., TROOP BAZAR, HYDERABAD. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BY ORDER OF HIGH COURT DATED 20-02-2009 IN W.P.NO. 3432 OF 2009 FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIZ; G. VENKATA SUBBAIAH-THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSSED OF AT THE ADMISSION STAGE WITH THE FOLLOWIGN OBSERVATION: LEARNED COUNSEL APPEARING FOR THE PETITIONER SUBMITS THAT IN VIEW OF THE CONDITION IMPOSED IN THE CALL LETTER, THERE IS LIKELIHOOD OF THE PETITIONER BEING OVER PERMITTED TO APPER FOR THE INTERVIEW. IN RESPONSE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE 2ND RESPONDENT SUBMITS THAT THERE IS NO CONDITION PRECEDENT FOR THE PETITIONER TO FACE THE INTERVIEW, BUT HIS SELECTION WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE VERIFICATION OF THE CERTIFICATES. SUCH IS THE STATEMENT MADE BY THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE 2ND RESPONDENT, THE APPREHENSION OF THE PETITIONER THAT THE 1ST RESPONDENT MAY NOT PERMIT HIM TO APPEAR FOR INTERVIEW HAS NO FOUNDATION - ORDER FOLLOWS. HIGH COURT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.NO. 3432 OF 2009 FOR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR