IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8489 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8489 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.8489 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.R.Shinde,A.P.P. for the Applicant Mr.S.A.Sawant for Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 11,2006. : DECEMBER 11,2006. : DECEMBER 11,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. The acquittal of the Respondents is for offences under sections 323,324,504 AND 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The learned Trial Judge has considered the evidence on record of all the prosecution witnesses and has come to the conclusion that the prosecution has not established the guilt of the Respondents. There appears to be a civil dispute pending between the parties about the immoveable property. The learned Trial Judge found that the evidence of P.W.Nos.1,2, 8 and 9 was totally inconsistent. I find that the view taken by the learned Trial Judge is a possible view and no case is made out for grant of leave. Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE