SBCWP No.7662/2008 Sunil Kumar Chug Vs. Ritu Raj Piepes & Plastics (P) Ltd., & Ors. 1 SBCWP No.7662/2008 Sunil Kumar Chug Vs. Ritu Raj Piepes & Plastics (P) Ltd., & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 7.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sajjan Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.Dinesh Mehta,for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The application has been submitted by defendant that the affidavit filed by Kamal Gurani, as evidence for plaintiff may be taken out of record because of the reason that in fact, the appointment of Addl. Director Kamal Gurani itself was illegal. The trial court rejected the petitioner's application vide order dated 4th Sept., 2008. I do not find any illegality in the said order. The petitioner's challenge to evidence of the plaintiff cannot be decided in this manner by putting evidence of the plaintiff out of record. Evidence is by unauthorized person or not SBCWP No.7662/2008 Sunil Kumar Chug Vs. Ritu Raj Piepes & Plastics (P) Ltd., & Ors. 2 and what is evidenciary value of the evidence can be decided at the time of deciding the suit. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-