?N -BHE. HIGH @®BR9"er 3xnai:©eroB®;&T a&B K.P. MS.^.^f-S /2000 s- Saa}eh»r«ag/e Khe^ihr* Sa -bnani aged 45Yts reapideate o£W.i»g»Bof*st p.S. BBMrisapaEa GE«nia BlstBict RaipuE (M.P.) Vess&f . Re^pondent s- Sfcatie o£ M.B. thEO-ugh Blls'ferle'b MagistBate R»4pat li ' " ' ! , ^SSSCIW UNBBR SiESJS&B,' 226/227: :,fl&.'EBB,®fflBE?a»raag'ee" , INMS. :' • 1:- • ! ' ' ' 1 XI-HC-22 's^ -^t^igsi, ®Tfra'(s,Risii'wt*, Writ Petltion So. 5215/20®<i 11*i9)l S»»l]l<ft W^ 200 sn^rqii snSsi S->H '^n^r cl'i[^I(n41l 'ITTT?^ff/^ I^St <fa^.i< '^3l{^Wi317^I - '. 28/4/2001 Heard Mr. B.N. Pasd^y, leamed e©anselfor the pe-fcitAener and Mr. Ranvlr 4^B69»» leamed G.A. fpr tbe o k O B R The order in^ugBed ^as Issaed by ttie Dlstri.et Magisfersfe OB extetned fron seven di^'i ., uuj.a» wara. lA.l.ch thewrifc petltloner tsicts saselyf Raipur, St apps&ES -Bbat ttae<?e are several erlailnal is not the matter pf ^iscussAon la the preseBt petition Inasnach as a spe^lfie grlevance has been tbat the wrlt petltl^nerwas not givenopporbunity bel.ng heard before the ^ripugaed prder of extenaeiat iMaglstra-fce. The eaid esder exterBmeat was Issyed u^der Section 5 o£ H.P. RaJ sur&tebe Adbj.niyem, 1.99 Q. Mr« Pandey, leanied sufeisaits tbat seetion 8 of ^he sald Adblniyan, 1S90 stipttlafeee fhat taeeriRg Jls couBsel for tbe ^etiti.o&ec to b®given befor®any order ['^^Rrt .nT^SI W | '^i^- '^ii?T I ^fra?'gt?? 3SR?I ?«iTWaf?a ^rafeT^'wi?ff tf fs^t ^7 sifiar sTie^l •» passed* As stated above, tbe maln ! writ pe'titioner 1s thafc the wrl'b ( given reasonable oppprtunity of €3cplanetlOB regarding th^ was issueja tQ the writ >etitlORer. j However, tttessne was servjed upon tKe . iatitipner e|n 2/8/2000 whereas the cas^ was actuatly - en Istj Augus-t 2000. Tbat neans tc^ say that notice served a'fter date fixed in this casje was already 3/18/2060 after reeeivipg the |Botlee the wrtt ' tl»E®us9»tois eounsel; SSe a^laaisg '-^^r 1 • : \ ^ positlos ln the natter* Xt is conCended tbat ao iaf^imation wes glven to tbe wiii'tspetitiOB®r* Oltinately tlhe Jflipugaed order was issuejd en 14/E/2000 Itls furyher eoRtenclea • during |the montb of August, there |was a strllte by tl^s te»»yersof Baip^r and asi sueb neither pe'titioiler ii®rhis lawyer taiew ttee jdateef lteari.ag i — . . ,.. - .. — 1-- -.. . . casej Thoasii In tbe liapugned ox-dflr It As Tecorded liearlnd was iield in Camera arid foitr wittiesses were .'.,. • ! there^»i^.notbiBg to shaW that exeminatlon wttcesse^ was done IBthegr^eneelof'thewrlt stitioner nor 1s theee anytblag to sh<w that the petltloner E 1 glven ogportunity of heartng* l: t r i.Hr-'' 31^1 aiT •SS^SII^T gn:TR7'ffl?B .sss-va :^H Is" iiti.:^:^^^:i^L i»•":l"":;?:!i-as'1. , T' 's^ ^nqT^pi, ®^(teT?s,faci!*iy 3iit?i'^snwaft? •» s « qOTferiN ITFWB'S fe^l TfsR?R q? aifigiT sn^i lear^ed eouasel fiar tfc< parties aRd on perasal of the rel^vant dee^ientB placed befeise order of aforesald, I an ®fthe vlew that ttee ii^iu^nea erder dated 14/8/2006 Inasmucb as the natural In tbe resd.fc, fh 'l 1s set passed by the leamed s. The learned Dlstriet petitipnsr and after the ^rtt petltiener's appearanee the niatter shall be eacamlt^sd and dlspossd ©£In aecordaace wltti law. I sNall aiake At elear that the petltioaer shall be affoi^ed adequnt®opportuni-ty ©f y- SdA ChiefJustice [~[ft^?fe-7