IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35452 of 2010 RAMASHRAY YADAV SON OF LATE PALKU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 4 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. Petitioner is facing prosecution under Sections 364A, 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code. His prayer for bail was rejected by this Court by order dated 9.5.2008 (Annexure-1). Petitioner renewed his prayer for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 39357 of 2008 which was considered and rejected by order dated 23.12.2008 (Annexure-2) with an observation that in the event the trial is not taken up within nine months from the date of order, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. It appears that petitioner again renewed his prayer for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 16552 of 2010. This Court by order dated 30.6.2010 after having noticed that only doctor is left to be examined, rejected the said prayer with an observation that the Trial Court shall endeavour and examine the remaining prosecution witness within two months from the date of receipt/communication of the order. A status report was called for in the case by order dated 6.10.2010 which has been received and is at Flag-P. From perusal of the report, it appears that all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the trial is posted for examination of accused under Section 313 of the Code of - 2 - Criminal Procedure. It is also seen therefrom that at least on two occasions, the matter was adjourned on account of failure of all accused to be present in person. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and after going through the materials on record, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner considering the fact that the trial is at very advance stage. Let the Trial Court conclude the same expeditiously. The application is dismissed. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)