IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-27762 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.09.2010 Sukhwinder Pal ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, having gone through the record, with his valuable help, as no ground for quashing of FIR is made out at this stage, while exercising the limited extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of this Court in the obtaining circumstances of the case. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for petitioner intends to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to raise all the points involved in the petition in the Trial Court. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is directed to be dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Be that as it may petitioner is directed/surrendered before the trial Court within two weeks from today. If he appear/surrender in pursuance of this order then the trial Magistrate would admit him on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the same amount to its satisfaction. 4. Meanwhile, the operation of the impugned order (Annexure P-2) is hereby stayed. 5. Disposed of accordingly. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge September 22, 2010 naresh.k