1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4844 OF 2010 (Ramlal Niluji Dhenge & Another) -: VERSUS :- (Subhash Narayan Pise & Another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. M. Ghare Adv for petitioners. Shri A. P. Thakre Adv for respondent 1. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2010. Heard Shri Ghare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Thakre learned counsel for the respondent 1. There is already a direction to appoint Election Officer to complete the election process at the earliest confirmed by this Court. One Mr. B. J. Lande an employee in the office of Deputy Charity Commissioner Nagpur accordingly came to be appointed as Election Officer. Respondent no.1 in present writ petition moved an application seeking direction to him to 2 continue with the election programme. In said proceedings present petitioners filed an application for intervention. The said application has been rejected by Deputy Charity Commissioner on 16th September 2010. On the same day he has passed another order and directed that election process should be commenced as per original order passed in M. C. A. 36 of 2007 and 6029 of 2005 in Change Report No. 242 of 2008. Shri Ghare contends that as Shri Lande has already retired he ceases to fulfill the requirements of directions issued by this Court in its order dated 13th August 2008 in Writ Petition 1832 of 2008. According to him a new election officer needs to be appointed and the proper election programme needs to be drawn. According to Shri Thakre who appears for respondent no.1, said Election Officer Shri Lande has completed election for the district of Gondia and process for election of Gadchiroli was started when because of challenge to the amendment of constitution process was required to be stayed. It is to be noted that there is a direction to appoint Election Officer issued by this Court on 30th August 2008 and accordingly Shri Lande came to be appointed. Before he could complete the entire election process he has retired. Order has been passed by this Court more than three years back. In this situation respondent no.1 only sought direction to continue with election process. The Deputy Charity Commissioner has 3 allowed that application. There is no question of moving any intervention application in such matter. If petitioners have got any other grievance they are free to raise it before appropriate forum. I am not inclined to interfere in present petition as I do not find any jurisdictional error. Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE SVK