IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 W.P(C).No. 3661 of 2008(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- V.K.YOWNACHAN, VATTAKATTIL HOUSE, PIRAVOM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SATHEESH RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.ROAD SECTION, MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. SRI.MOHANAN, PALAKKATTU HOUSE, PIRAVOM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 3661 OF 2008 J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that in his neighbourhood in the the 4th respondent has set up a hut in the Puramboke land. According to him, this causes obstruction to the public and he has made Ext. P3 complaint before the 3rd respondent on which no action has been taken. It is in this background this writ petition has been filed. 2. On instruction, the learned Govt. Pleader submits that though the hut is apparently in puramboke land it is not causing any obstruction either to the public or to the traffic. If that be so, I do not think that exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, the 4th respondent should be driven out of his homestead. If, according to the 3rd respondent, there is any obstruction, it is up to him to take action on Ext. P3 about which I do not wish to express any opinion. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-