IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35466 of 2006 SATISH CHANDRA PATEL @ SATISH PATEL Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 7. 17.03.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The duty of the Court is to obtain the best available evidence for adjudication of the controversy. By the impugned order dated 8.5.2006 the learned Magistrate has only exercised his discretion under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure availability of best evidence. The order is considered, discussed and with due application of mind. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. This application is rejected. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)