IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CM Nos. 11573-74 of 2011 and CWP No. 1623 of 2008 Date of decision: August 30 , 2011 Mohinder Singh ....... Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.3. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). CM NO. 11573-74 of 2011 1. C.Ms. are allowed. 2. Documents taken on record. CWP No.1623 of 2008 3. It is brought through an affidavit of the Director, Govt. of India, Ministry of Home, Freedom Fighters Division, New Delhi that pension has been sanctioned as payable to the petitioner at the rate of `6330/- per month. No further directions are necessary and the writ petition is disposed of taking note of the subsequent development by the proceedings of the Union granting the pension in the manner referred to above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 30 , 2011 archana