COURT OF CHHATTIéGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition 18) No. 569 of 2008 HIGHX Petitioner Versus 1. 2. 3. Nar'endra Kumar Karsh, S/o. Shri Purshottam Prasad Karsh, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Shaskiya Prathmik Shaia, Sanjay Nagar, Nariyara, Block Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Janjgir, Distt. ~ Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa, (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH Single Bench :‘Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri K. S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. (Passed on this 28th day of JanuaW , 2008) The petitioner Was appointed initially, on a fixed pay of Rs. 300/». The petitioner was thereafter, granted regular pay scale on completion of the The question of law involved herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State, jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 ( Sushii Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.1 1.2006. probation period. in view of the above~stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms, subject to verification of the facts. No order asto costs/./V//”“ 1:. al- Ag“""°m . , K Sans, r ‘h Judge Thaklfr ?r. / Respondents N E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA V ORAL ORDFR