1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7428/2005. Suresh Chand Shukla. VERSUS A.D.J.No.2, Kota and Others. 12.09.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Rinesh Gupta, for the petitioner. Mr.V.L.Mathur ] Mr.Mohd.Anees ] for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved of the judgment dated 03.10.2001 by which the preliminary issues, which were framed, No.4, 5, 6 and 7 have been decided in favour of the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the parties submit that now the entire trial is concluded and the matter is ripe for final arguments before the learned trial court. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere at this stage in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Suffice it to say that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by the ultimate judgment and decree that may be passed by the 2 learned trial court, the petitioner would be entitled to raise all these objections, which have been raised in this writ petition, in the appeal that may be filed against the judgment and decree. Subject to the above, the writ petition as well as the stay application stand disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.