KBP 1 ca5263-93.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5263 OF 1993 IN SECOND APPEAL [STAMP] NO.8954 OF 1993 (Bhimachary Vs. Gangadhar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Applicant in person present. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 3 rd MARCH, 2011 P.C. This application is for condonation of 3 years and 249 days’ delay in filing Second Appeal. 2] Heard applicant appearing in person. None appears for the respondent. Applicant has preferred the above Second Appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 7 th April, 1989 passed by the learned 4 th Addl. District Judge, Solapur in Civil Appeal No.730 of 1984. By that judgment, learned District Judge dismissed the appeal preferred by the applicant and confirmed the judgment and decree dated 27 th February, 1984 passed by learned Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Solapur in Regular Civil Suit No.60 of 1980. 3] After the dismissal of appeal, the applicant filed Review Application no.6 of 1989 before the learned District Judge on 28 th June, 1989. The review application KBP 2 ca5263-93.sxw was rejected on 7 th December, 1992. The applicant, thereafter, preferred Civil Revision Application bearing Stamp No.8952 of 1993 on 5 th April, 1993. The said Civil Revision Application was disposed of on 14 th June, 1993 and thereafter, the present Second Appeal is filed on 14 th July, 1993. The applicant states that the delay caused is neither deliberate nor intentional. He was diligently prosecuting his remedies. 4] Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay. Hence, Civil Application No.5263 of 1993 is allowed with no order as to the costs. Delay is condoned. [ R.G.KETKAR, J. ]