\. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. N0. 4-353 /2006 PETITIONER Motilal Tataboli , S/o .Shri- Bhukhau Ram Tamboli, aged about 63 years , retired as ex lacturer posted under tribal departraent R/o ViUage- kotmi sonar Post - Sohagpur Dist. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS „./"^"l sf-"^ _.; --. f-<" ffe ^l (^fo .^',<: v^ '^ G^&"> 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, , Department of Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. ^ Account General, Account and , Hakdari Nidhi 05 Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 flWcTT aitTTqi SST'qraicTq', »Tn«*l6,Rfcll+iy .^s.f..'^ss.2>.W.. ^ 200 Sll^l Maqi (*l°i!3<s«<<T) (rarau^T»ii°b ^arareHfwsiT^T 18.8.2006 Mrs. Renu Kochar, Advocate) Mr. 5umesh Bajaj, advamce copy. Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, respondent No.2. Heard. The main grievance raised 1+iat the petitioner retired on post Lecturer ond after his petitioner has not been paid to h that the entries regarding period 1987to 1988 and 1992 to Whereas, •riie petitioner's 1988 an amount of Rs.12,000/- amount of Rs.14,000/- were the salary of petitioner and representation to responderst original 6PF poss book in which has a!so been submitted to resp^ amount along witii interest, as is not being pdid to the petitioner. for the petitioner. ©oyernrijientAdvocate for respondent No.l on hdvocate takes notice on behaif of by ths petitioner in this petition is 311.7.2005 while he was workin9 on the r^tirement, WF amount due to the Im. t" << .1< ... . ias» atit is cbi'ilti'i'ifl-i iiifirfftec3'<Ri^i< ^S^TSn^T dedljction of 6PF contribution for the 1^93 are missing. |s<ise is that for the period 1987 to ^nd for the period 1992 to 1993 cn dedilcted towards ©PFcontribution from the petitioner had already made !^o.2 regarding deductions. Evsn the •these deductions have been attested 'esp^ndent No.2, but even tiien the 6PF ad^issible under the relevtmt provisions, P.T.O. w-?"-" 5-C XI-HC-78 3^ -^ww^, vi-^[w\e, Rlciiti^< *11*<MI SbHl^i ?PIT 3TT^?r Tg^ (lyi^cji^sr) '^ c^ ^' gb~ '^ ST(ITW:Hf%a'3[I^T Lecrned counsel for the p< |©PFpassbook m which -rtie entri amount for the disputed period a respondents are not paying th Therefore, learned counset for petitioner may be allowed to respondent Nos.l & 2 ond in turn, in accordance with law, to which have no objection. Havir.g hsard learnsd coun; to the facts ond circumstances ofl make a detailed representation to & annexurss of this petition respondent Nos.l & 2 are dire| payment of ©PFamount to the p( from the dote of receipt of the after considering the 6PF pdss With the direction Qforesaid Certified copy as per rutes. ^CTfeft-T WEfi-ff t|: tet^l-rf^KK ^sri^irgn^T (titioner submitred Thar the original i^s regarding the deductions of (5PF i^e already there, but even then 1+se i^ 6PF amount to the petitioner. the petitioner submitted that the make a fresh representation to |they be directed to decide the same learned counsel for 1+)e respondents for 1+ie pcrties cnd having regord the case. the petitioner is allowed to respondent Nos.l & 2 nlong with copy wi-t^sin 10 days frorn today ond irs turn, Jire^ted to pass 1+ie orders regarding ititioner wil+iin a period of 2 months ^epresentation in accordance with law bo<tk and other relevant documents. the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.