IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4368 of 2006 SRI SANT KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI DEO NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOLHA, POST OFFICE AND GRAM PANCHAYAT- NONHAR, POLICE STATION AND BLOCK- BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM :---PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY CUM-COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 6. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 7. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 9. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 10. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. :---RESPONDENT 1ST SET. 11. MAMTA DEVI, WIFE OF DHANESHWAR PD. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOLHA UNDER POST AND GRAM PANCHAYAT-MONHAR, POLICE STATION AND BLOCK BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM :--- RESPONDENT 2ND SET. ----------- 2. 10.03.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of the plot over which the Anganwadi Centre in Village- Kolha under Nonhar Gram Panchayat in Bikramganj Block of Rohtas district is being raised. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that earlier some other plot was selected which was more convenient for the villagers but on the pressure of the father-in-law of Respondent No. 11 the selected plot has been changed. In this connection, petitioner has filed 2 representation dated 28.01.2006 which is addressed to the District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram and is contained in Annexure-1 to this application. 3. From the counter affidavit it appears that the District Magistrate is the competent authority to approve the plot over which Anganwadi Centre is to be raised in any village. In the circumstances, I deem it expedient to direct the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 28.01.2006, Annexure-1, as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the District Magistrate. 4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. ( V.N.Sinha, J.)