IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8029 of 2010. Decided on: 4th April, 2011. Rajesh Kumar. ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. … .Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(i) That the impugned order passed by the Director Respondent No.2 dated 12.10.2010 (Annexure P-7) may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondent No.3 and 4 may very kindly be directed to place on record the order of appointment of respondent No.5 and the same may be declared as illegal, null and void and may be quashed and set aside. (iii) That oral order of termination of services of the petitioner passed by Principal may be declared illegal, null and void and the same may also be quashed and set aside. The respondents No.3 and 4 be also directed to appoint the petitioner as Lab Attendant will all consequential benefits forthwith.” 2. The Principal of the College and the President, PTA are present. It is submitted that the private respondent has been accommodated purely by way of private arrangement by the PTA. That appointment is not under the PTA policy. 2 It is submitted that the said arrangement is made on need basis and in the case of the petitioner also, in future if there is any need for appointment of a Lab. Attendant or any other suitable vacancy, the petitioner will be preferentially considered. The above submissions are recorded. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 4th April, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr/vt) Judge.