^iiISE F RfKRH iS^^'LtL, Pt^^^li' f-zT&^- IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDIC^TURE ATBILASPUR fC.G.) WfyTPETITION. fS^ N0.^§56OF 2006 <^;' PETITIONER :- ..••" ^^§y^ ^^'•"" ./ Smt. Seeta Devi Sahu W/o. Ramkumar Sahu, aged about 28 Years, Oecupatlon - House wife, R/o. Village - Nayakharve, Tahsil- Kasdol, Vikashkhand Kasdol Dist.- Raipur ( C.6.) V $• ?.^-'- VERSUS RESPONDENTS < State of Chhattisgarh through the Seeretary Panchayat and Soclal Department Mantralaya D.K. S. Building Ralpur ( C.G.) The Director , Women and Child, Development Department Chhattisgarh Raipur, Tahsil and Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Raipur, Distt.- Raipur ( C.G.) The Project officer, Integrated Child, Development Kasdol, Distt-.- Raipur ( C. G. ) Chief Executive officer, Janpad Panchayat Kasdol Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Laxmj Sahu W/o. Chhabilal Sahu, aged about 18 years, R/o. Vlllage - Kharve, Tahsil - Kasdol, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22^ OF CONSTITUTION_ OF INDIA /5. XI-HC-78 ^ TE? '<<NICl<<, »Tfl«'16,[afdiy^ Wn^T?K^C;M'^-h^^p-^-k^ 200 3ll^l ^iath ('{cfi^d^ir) sn^rqirf^iRi (raTsn^TsbMiti <; s^aiw Hf?cr sn^r 2.1.2007: courisel Shri Sunil Sahu learned Ms. Sunita Jain PL for the re By the instant petition appointment of respondent No.6to| Gram Panchayat Naya Kharve, Jar|pad Grievance of the petitioner is that| appointed as Ariganwadi Worker a^ as prescribed under the scheme of Heard counsel forthe petitioi|ier From perusal of the record raised this grievance before the demand of justice has been giveh before approaching this Court. Thu^ dismissed at this stage. However, his grievances before the competerlit same strictly in accordance with lav^. In view of this order MWP disposed of. i»ii<(Fci41-iiii<-iTffte^t'<Ri+<ii< ^arf^iran^r forthe petitioner. pondents 1 to 5 on advance copy. (he petitioner has challenged the the post of Anganwadi Worker within Panchayat Kasdol District Raipur. respondent No.6 is not eligible to be she does not fulfill the eligible criteria l^nnexures P-5 to P-7. and perused the record. |it appears that the petitioner has not cjompetent authority and no notice for by him to the competent authority in these circumstances, the petition is |if the petitioner so desires, may raise authority who in turn shall decide the Mo. 4926/2006 for interim relief stands Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.