BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU WP(MD)No.5155 of 2011 A.Kuddus :Petitioner -Vs- The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchirappalli District. :Respondent This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service in the event of the trial in Special C.C.No.16 of 2007 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchi not concluding within the time frame stipulated by this court. For Petitioner: Mr.A.Kuddus, Party in person For Respondent: Mr.M.Govindan, Spl.G.P. ORDER The petitioner seeks for a direction to reinstate him in service in the event of trial in Special C.C.No.16 of 2007 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchi not concluding within the time frame stipulated 2.The petitioner was suspended for having demanded and accepted bribe and a criminal case was registered. He filed a writ petition before this court being W.P.(MD)No.10119 of 2009 and was allowed by an order dated 12.10.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent has filed a writ appeal in W.A.(MD)No.120 of 2010. The said writ appeal was heard along with the other writ appeals and disposed of by a common order dated 12.3.2010. In the common order, this court held that there is no case for interfering with the order of suspension. But a direction was given to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to conduct trial and conclude the same preferably within three months. The petitioner once again came before this court in W.P.(MD)No.9701 of 2010. That writ petition was dismissed by this court on 06.09.2010 Again, the petitioner filed a writ appeal before the division bench in W.A (MD)No.628 of 2010. The division bench had dismissed the writ appeal Thereafter, the petitioner did not prefer any further appeal. 3.The petitioner having lost two rounds of litigation cannot file the third writ petition on the very same subject matter. The continuance of suspension has been reviewed by the authority and they are not inclined to revoke the same in the light of the trial in the criminal case. 4.In the light of the above, there is no case made out. Accordingly, the writ petition will stand dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchirappalli District. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.40328. RP/01.12.2011/1P/3C. W.P.(MD)NO.5155 of 2011,16.11.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/