IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19346 of 2009 MAHINDRA SINGH @ MAHENDRA SINGH, son of Bhagwat Singh, resident of village-Hemra, P.S.-Muffasil, District-Begusarai-----------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that suspicion is cast upon this petitioner also as there was land dispute. According to the learned counsel, actually there was no land dispute in between the deceased and this petitioner. Further he submits that Butla and Sunil Singh were seen by some people taking the deceased and it is said that Sunil and Butla were contracted to kill the deceased by this petitioner and that also is only suspicion or imagination but in course of investigation Sunil Singh was apprehended who confessed his guilt and in that confession he clearly states that killing was contracted by father-in-law of the deceased and his own elder brother who was languishing in jail in the case of his father’s killing. If there is chance of appearance of any material that can be taken in to consideration at the time of framing of charge but till now there is no evidence at all justifying petitioner’s arrest. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in - 2 - connection with Begusarai(Town) P.S. case no.46 of 2009 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, materials further collected by the investigating officer shall be scrutinized at the stage of charge. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )