.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.88 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.482 OF 2002 N/s. Anuraag Sites and Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & 2 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.J.Rais, Sr.Counsel with Ms.Nita G. Solanki, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.C.U.Singh, Sr.Counsel with Mrs.P.A.Purandhare, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs.S.M.Dandekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2. Mr.S.C.Naidu with Mr.S.I.Menon, Advocates for Respondent No.3. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. P.C.: 1. The matter pertains to hoardings 191 & 192. The committee found that prima facie the hoardings are offending. The authority thereafter has passed an order on 18th August, 2005, that the hoarding site did not violate any of the conditions which were pointed out by the committee. However, considering the order passed in Writ Petition No.1132 of 2002 which requires that the matter be placed before that Court .[2]. hearing the matter in respect of offending hoardings. It would be appropriate for the petitioners to move that Court for appropriate directions even in respect of the subject matter of this Petition. Considering that, present Motion stands disposed of. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]