IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 25560 of 2007 Between: Seelam Ramesh Babu, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, R/o D.No.77-9-27, Gandhipuram-3, Rajahmundry Post, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Visakhapatnam rep., by its (1) The Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation, Town-I, Sub Division, Jampeta Junction, Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry-(PO), E.G.Dist.-533 103. 2 The Divisional Engineer, Operation, APEPDCL, Vidyut Sakhabhavan, Godavaribund, Rajahmundry (PO) E.G.Dist-533 101. 3 The Chairman Cum Managing Director, APEPDCL, Corporate Office, Seetamma Dhara, Visakhapatnam (PO) & Dist. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order, writ, direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus under Art.226 of Constitution of India by declaring the demand notice Lr.No.ADE/O/TOWN-I/RJY/F.DOC No. /07-08 D.No.948/07 dt.22-11- 07 and consequent action of the 1st respondent by disconnecting power supply to the elec.S.C.No.11335, 9546 on 26-11-2007 relating to petitioners godowns at Rajahmundry where there are no electrical dues or arrears pending and only for the purpose of collecting the balance amounts under theft of electricity charges relating to S.C.No's.12467 of M/s.Sai Prakash Metal Industries belonged to him which is still under litigation before the Court, as illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, unsustainable and set aside the same in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following : Order: Questioning the action of the respondents in disconnecting the power supply to the service connection Nos.11335,9546 on 26.11.2007 relating to the petitioners godowns at Rajahmundry, the present writ petition is filed. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already preferred appeals against the dismissal of the suits filed by him and obtained necessary orders in the said appeals and, therefore, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 28.2.2008 msv