IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^cl/2011 PETITIONER HEMANT KUMAR YADAV, Age 27 Years, S/o Late Shri bodhan Ram Yadav, R/o Village & Post Office - Sirsa Khurd, Tahsil & District - Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS r:'--:v >' (N V ^••'^..-•"' .<>••" -•••' r.---'''.'^'\/ 1. State of Chhatiisgarh, Through its Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. State Of Madhya Pradesh, Through its Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal(M.P.) 3. Director, Agriculture Mandi, 26 - Kisan Bhavan, Arera Hills, Bhopal (M.P) 4. The Director, Chhattisgarh Rajya Vipanan Board, Old Ganj Mandi Premises, Raipur(C.G.) 5. Secretary, Agriculture Produce, Mandi Samiti, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UN DER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. '»°', €^ <tyJ»'' A 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: As given in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARSOF THE RESPONDENTS: As given in the cause title. 3. PARtlCULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH PETITION IS FILED: ^^ i •' XI-HC—78 tflrq^T ^iqrai ~3^f •^WIC;^, »Tlly'IS, FslMiyy . arp-c^2/7L<ci/n •W^ 200 W^T1raq? (^qf^si^tT) an^i^T R(.fic(i 'cf«TT sn^9r gi*iic^ wgrw ^fei aii^i cT)W<r)<i1Ti iTRcff ^f 'fe^t <^l^t< ^3TfipT3n^?r Shri Yogesh Pandey; ccl unsel for the petitioner Shri Y. S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. Counsel for the petj petitioner is an unfortunate| father late Bodhan Ram Yad^v on 11.11.1994 who was a government employee. H|e submits that initially the mother of the petitioner seeking compassionate ap^ointment and the Board was kind enouah to cbnside compassionate appointmertt on 11,03.1997. On 19.03,1997, due to her< circumstances mother of application for appointment| his majority. Counsel for the petitj the representation filed tioner submits that the person where he lost his had fiied an applicatfon her case and granted her ill health and famjly the petftjoner filed an of her son after attaining bner submits that though by the petitioner after attaining majonty has be^n rejected by respondent i.4 vide annexure P-1 bujt while rejecting the same the coneerned authority hjas not considered all the c XI-HC—78 sn^v w R;-fi+ 'n^n sn^r'spTRr "S^ "41<41d^l, ^fll'M'lfi, f°«v11'Mll< <Ai-P- LSJ ^7q°|/i, *<l*4rtl (h^j^, - • •---1 •'•- >f li 3?I^?TTR^>' ('^pf351StT) 0 TCnwHfNsti^f relevant aspects of the casj the State Government. Shri Pandey submits| be permitted to withdraw thf to fite proper representati!{in He is permitted to do sp Accordingly, the wrlt withdrawn wlth the aforesaid *l<l[cf<il-f 'qTtIdf if fs<S tRit^K ^?3TRl»i3D^ a and vartous circutars of that at this stage he may s writ petition with liberty before the competent petition is dismissed libertv. s&'-_^^t ^Vf^ ?^^ ^^