n~ ”1 g K @ WW 3m“? IN THE HIGJ:I COURT OF JUDICA; RE AT BILASPUR‘ CHHATTIS§ARH w.P. No. 398 [2905 PETITIoNER / M.D. Bharadwaj, aged about 43 years, S/o. Shri Santram R/o Adarsh Nagar, Kusmunda Qtr No \ ,(zw/q M Katghora 718 SECL District Colony, Korba, TahsH Chhattisgarhs VERSU$ State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Hearth and Family Wetfare, D.K‘S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh / 1. (/2. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: The Secretary, Government of M.P. Vallabh “l Bhawan, Bhopa‘, Madhya Pradesh 3. The M.P. Board of Ayurvedic: and Unani System of Medicine and Naturopathy Board, Madhya Pradesh Bhopai, MP. V Through: Its Registrar f 4. The Chhatusgarh Board of Ayurvedlc and Unam System of Medlcme and Naturopathy Board Chhattlsgarh Rarpur Through: Its Registrar / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITION OF INDIA / XI—HC422 ’ . w€q... ?.<>..%T 5W,m,m} Wm 111 200 ?M )1 > Shn’ Sanjay Kn. Agraw Shu‘ ViVtrk Shanna, Pa Counsel for the patitic passed by this Court in simi] State Counsel is not in In View of the order da 55$ or 2001 (Zahiruu K1 Chhattisgarh and others), I: pres€m petition can be exajj at the time of consideratio. disposed of with the direc‘ iequisite folm for emolmenit and the same be examined. on merit by» the Ciompetent judgment rendered by MP. ’ 1990 decided on 6*5— 1997. copy of that order With the for emolment. Certihed copy as per r rues. a1, Advocate for the petitioner. nel Lawyer for State. oer submits that order has been ar wrii petition. a position to dispute this fact. ted 24-4—2001 passed in WP. No. 1am and another —-v- ,State of 111 the aspects contained in the lined by the Competent Authority at 1n the result, this petition is Hon that the petitioner be given gtuthon‘ty keeping in View the High Court in we. No. 287 of The petiuoner should enclose‘a form While submitting the forms Sdl— Fakhruddin Judge aw mmm$6 W nma‘r‘E few?WK %a1%wm 23-3-2005