IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-10977 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 19, 2010 Ram Kumar and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Johan Kumar, Advocate for Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent no.2 to protect the life and liberty of the present petitioners at the hands of respondent no.4. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Panipat, District Panipat, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application/representation, dated 1.4.2010, Annexure P4, already made to him by the petitioners in this regard. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Superintendent of Police, Panipat, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application/representation, dated 1.4.2010, Annexure P4, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. 19.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge