IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2212 of 2010 MUNMUN JI TIWARY & ORS. . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 4. 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Counsel for the State filed show cause. It is submitted from Annexure-B dated 30.4.2011 numbered 1665/P-1, that the scale of Rs.4000-6000/-has been granted to the petitioners conditionally. Counsel for the petitioners rightly submits that the order only directs conversion of the pay scale but does not talk and/or give direction for payment. The order on the writ petition itself notices that the controversy was covered by certain orders of the Supreme Court. When the Court passes an order everything that is required to be consequentially done has to be performed by the authorities without awaiting further directions from the Court as the consequential action is inherent in the parent action. It is unfortunate that the order dated 30.4.2011 ignores the consequential part after 2 fixation of the revised pay scale. The re-fixation of the scale was obviously for payment with consequential benefits. The order dated 30.4.2011 is not an order in futility. It is unfortunate that a truncated order has been passed by the authorities. The Court directs the order dated 30.4.2011 to be implemented in its true spirit along with the consequential action of actual fiscal monetary payments to the petitioners within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The contempt proceeding stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)