$W£LE'BER\§$H IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (ca) WRIT PET1T10N(S)N0. \m% OF 2010 PETITIONER.............; ....................... Rajesh Singh Chandel, aged about 38 Years, S/o Shri Kalyan Singh Chandel, R/o 148 Shrishthi Colony, Kamla College Road Ward No.39, Rajnandgaon, Distt. _Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / / VERSUS ESPONDENTS ........................ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Welfare Departpment, ‘Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / V 2. Zila Panchayat Rajnandgaon . Through— Chief Executive Offlcer, l Zila anchayat Rajnandgaon Distt. — Rajnandgaon (C.Gz) x 3. (Eanpad Panchayat Rajnandgaon, Through— Chief Executive Officer, Distt.— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER URTICALE 226 OF THE L__________—— CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. Particulars of the Petitioner :- As mentioned above in the cause title. R P HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA J SINGLE BENCH Rj Sig Chidel aesh nh al’ Vs. ersu S f hgh hs tate o Chattisar and oter ‘ PETTIONER I RTS ESPONDEN P i i f idia etition u/A 226 of‘tle Consttution o n ppearanc Ae: S Ou th potitier hri Rakesh Thakur, CnseI for o on. S “ L' f S dane y; mt, Smita Ghai,Pane1 aWyer or the tate, on avc cop Passed on 3.8.20 o mssio Heard n adin. \ - C f p p hd, ase o the euuoner is that ursuant to advertisement peuuoner a app pp d HI the lied for aomtment to the post of Sh1ksha Kat-rm Grae 1n ear 2008. However, the p‘etltlonerwas not appomted, asacconi y m e e x ‘ pn th Cui r Learned counsel for the etitioer submits that’is ortxvd'e orde d y p N e ase of s1m11arl s1111ated ahcants du‘ected at case of hos c y pp th th te , p ible etitioners may be consnlered for grant of age relaxation 1f permiss u g bttd a nder the leal pmv1s1ons Thereafter, the peunoner surme eresentation on 19 3 2010 (Annexure Pv8) for cons1erat10n o ln c h d dg ase, but the same as remame enin ated 22nd Februar 2010 assed m W P (S) o 482912008 1n th Writ Petition (S) No. 41 18/2010 ( 10) x x the ptitioner, he was informed that he is overaget rp d f s r 4 A perusal‘df Ico'mmum'cau‘on datafi 24.5.20 10 (Annexure P‘9) shows ‘ that bn‘tll‘e representah'on of the petitioner, his case has been referred V» e for determination to the Director, Panchayat 85 Social SewiceS _ Directorate, ‘Raipur. The petitioner. however,without awaiting fdr any‘_ ‘ * drders, hasapproa’ched this Gourt. 5’ Accordingly, this Court is not inclined'to entertain this petitionat this stage-(However, in view of communication dated 24.5.20 10 ‘(Annekurfe I, mi i P—9), it would‘be open for the Director,rPanchayat 85 Social ServiCes to, _ tke apprpriae eciion in te cae of te ptitioner, in accordance 4' with law. a ot ds h s h e 6 Wh the afresaid obvatons, pet finaly dsed oh. i it o seri ition is l ispo ‘ / - Manindra Moh Svastava an hri Sd/