el t, $- * 42. IN THE HIGH COT]RT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(O No.2692 of 2010 TOWNSEND CONSTRUCTIONS AND EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate. - ..... Respondents Through: N4r. N. Waziri, Standing counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate. WITH ..... Petitioner ?- 44. 53. + W.P.(O No. 2703 of 2010 GADGET BUILDERS PRIVATE LTD. Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate. VETSUS GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. N. Waziri, Standing counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate. AI\D W.P.(C) No. 2725 of 2010 ELEVATOR PROMOTERS PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate. W.P.(C) Nos. 2692,2703 & 2725 of 2010 page 1/3 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified +,i VETSUS GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents oh *) Through: Mr. N. Wazfti, Standing counsel for GNCTD with A&. Shoaib Haider, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MT]RALIDHAR ORDER 23.04.2010 ;W.P.(C) No.Zeg2 of W.P.(C) No. 2703 of 2010 & CM No. 5392 of 20L0 (for stav) w.P.(c) No. 2725 0f 2010 & cM No. 5426 0f 2010 (for stay) 1. Notice. IVk. N. Waziri, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents waives service of notice. Z. Nfu. Malhotra, refers to Section 4 of the Delhi Lands (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, !972 as well as the judgment of this Court in O.P.C. Jain v. J-A.D.M (LA) 42 (1990) DLT 475 (DB) and states that it has been clarified that in response to an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 ('RTI Act') that the properly in question is not the subject matter of acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and therefore, there is no need for any 'no objection certificate ('NOC') to be obtained. ty.P.(C) Nos. 2692,2703 & 2725 of2010 page 2/3 3, 3. Mr. Waziri states that the offrcer concerned will have to consider the response given to the application under the RTI Act and clariff whether no NOC is required. 4. It is directed that since the information in response to the RTI application has been given by the Department itself, the officer concerned on the basis of such information will clarifu to the Sub-Registrar within one week from -1- today that no NOC is required to be issued. Thereafter the Sub-Registrar will take steps to release the sale deed to the Petitioner. 5. The writ petitions and the applications are disposed of. 6. Order dasti to the parties. U 7- APRIL 23,2010 dn W.P.(C) Nol 2692,2703 & 2725 of 2010 S. MURALIDHAR, J page 3/3