WP(C) 2674/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K.SHARMA Heard Mr. H.G. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner as wel l as Mr. P. Deka, learned counsel representing the respondent-Bank. Also heard M r. N. Borah, learned C.G.S.C. appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.5. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged th e Annexure-’D’ notice dated 7.5.2007 issued by the respondent-BAD (Bank’s) Loans Recovery Service. As per the said notice, the petitioner is to pay an amount o f Rs.3,65,045/-. As per the notice, the loan amount having not repaid by the pe titioner, his assets are liable to be seized under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. By the notice, the petitioner was directed to repay the loan to the Bank within 7 days from the date of receipt of the notice under threat of ne cessary action in the matter. According to the petitioner, the notice has been issued in viola tion of the provisions of Section 31 and 36 of the SARFAESI Act. It will be open for the petitioner to respond to the notice by submitting representation urging all the grounds, as have been urged in the writ petition. In the event of resp onding to the notice by submitting representation from the date of 15 days from today, the bank shall deal with the said representation and pass appropriate ord er. No opinion is expressed in this regard. Whatever may be the outcome of consi deration of the representation of the petitioner, if filed within 15 days from t oday, same shall be communicated to him. Writ petition is disposed of.