c. 2137” IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR e WRIT PETITION (C) No. 5W3 OF 2010 :— 1. Smt. Pratibha Gayakwad, aged 34 years, w/o Shri Ravindra Gayakwad, R/o Vijeta Complex, Junior MIG Block —11, Quarter No. 242 New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 4 Dhanshfi Gayakwad aged about 8 years (minor) D/o Shri Ravindra Gayakwad through Smt. Pratibha GayakWad (Mother, Natural guardian). :VERSUS ESPONDENT :-/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Chief Secretary, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). /2. Ravindra Gayakwad, aged‘ about 45 years, s/o Shri Ba§udev Rao Gayakwad, Occupation — Tracer (Anurekhak) Office of Director (Sanchalak Mudran Tatha Lekhan Samagri Vibhag) Raipur (C.G.) / 3. Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur (C.G.) (Presiding Officer Smt. Shraddha Shukla) District Court, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Proteétion Officer under the (rotection of Women from DomestiCa violence Act, 2005 Rai ur (0G). . Kajw Tatab Rwi {yucca} '5. uperintendent of Police, Raipur / (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226(227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE o'F MANDAMU’s ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE. ' 1] ‘ PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERz- As given above in the cause title. ’4 ® £3 PETITIONERS / R ym ‘§ ./" PETITIQNERS RESPONDENTS SB:-\ HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL J PRESENT :— 4 i? Shri Rahul Birthare, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri Vinod ,Tekam, Panel Lawye; for the respondents No.1 ri S. Imtiyaz Ali, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. an 4 Sh \ Sh . ’ 4»\\\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 'w.P. (c) No. 942/2010 Smt. Pratibha Gayakwad and another Versus State of Chhattis'garh and others d5. , ri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate, appears as amicus curiae. o RAL J o RD E R (25—1—2011) 4V Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of directing: the trial Court/ «Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur to decide the main case expeditiously. ‘ Prayer is reasonable. As per Section 12(5) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, applications are to be decided Within a period of 6O days. Therefore, this petition is disposed of and it is directe i that the trial Court/ Judicial Magistrate First Class,’ Raipur shall decide the main petition preferred by the petitioner in the light of provisions contained in Section 12(5) of the Protection of the Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and the rules made thereunder. %K/§7%x \ i. N.K. Agrawa‘ ‘ Judge / i \ \v. d