§ m THE HHGH COURT OF JUDECATURE AT BLASPUR ‘ (wa /2002 V ' f: Ei V AV Hmdéa mgr §S$amme 0f wwamaw 61%;“ BQARD $EONDARY @F Q EDUCAHQ /HQPAL ‘ 2 Writ Petition No. “5 x ,xB 2?@1f 1the€0mmmtmm Qf R PETEWQNER : N MESH AGRAWAL / S/O Dr Satya Narayan Agarwal AGED ABQUT 17 YEARS x W THROUGH GUARMAN ’ ’ Dr Satya Naryam Agarwa! ‘ RESWENT OF GANDAH ,. " " MST. RAJNANDGQAN " ‘1 ${Q7’n «GHHAWSGARH 3‘61» 3“ "x 65 Versus RE$P®N§ENTZ BUARD OE SECQNARY » EDUCAHON, MP, BHOPAL, THR®UGH HS SECRETARY XIHC22 '~~ ww‘j mm §Eg55v W 7 mirau§fw+m A awmww 13-11-2002 Shn‘ Rajeev Shrivastava, counsel for the petiiioner. Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. A‘dv. for the State. Heard., The gnevance of the wnt hemloner 1s to the machon on the part of the respondent Boalq of Secondary Educatlon M P Bhopal, in not completing the whrk of rechecking and scrutiny of marks in subject of Biolo petmon 1s a copy of the actmowledgment 1ssued by the respondent Board bV Whlch an apphcanon of the petlhoner for recheclqng and scruuny of mar s was recexved. Alongw1th that application a Demand Draft of R .120/ - towalds the fee, issued in favour of the Secretaxy, Board of Education, Bhopal was also enclosed, as is clear from the emx copy, which is part of Anncxurc 13-8). Since there is no other dis ute involved, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent Board Secondary Education, Bhopal to complete the work of Iechecking and scrutiny of marks within a period of three weeks from the date of communican'on / , Annexure P-8 to the wn‘t receipt of ‘ the Order of WW wW amfawm Roshan this Court and commum petitioner within a week the] Consequently LA. Nc . \ also stand dispOSed of. Certiiied copy as per r .eate the result thereof to the ‘eafter. 1499/2002 for urgent hearihg Sd/- ules. t P.C-Naik Judge