THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10723 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner, who is a retired Line Inspector of Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited, seeks directions to the respondents to release and pay him retiral benefits as per letter bearing No.DEE/ O/BBL/JAO/ADM/U1/D.No.157/2010, dated 18.01.2010. It appears, in various suits, the petitioner was the defendant and suffered money decrees on the file of Senior Civil Judge Courts, Parvathipuram and Gajuwaka. To execute the said decrees, the plaintiffs filed E.P.s and obtained prohibitory orders against the respondents herein from paying retiral benefits to the petitioner. In the letter bearing No.DEE/ O / BBL / JAO / ADM /U1/D.No.157/2010, dated 18.01.2010, addressed by the Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation Division, Bobbili, to the Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam, the amounts, which are due by the petitioner to various Courts and other financial agencies, were mentioned and total of the same was Rs.6,03,056/-. In the same letter, details of retiral benefits i.e. gratuity, capitalized value of commutation of pension, terminal leave salary, GPF final withdrawal and GIS, were given. It is the case of the petitioner that all the retiral benefits payable to him cannot be attached in view of letter, dated 18.01.2010 as such the respondents be directed to pay him the amounts, which are exempted from attachment. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that in the attachment order, dated 01.01.2010 passed in E.P.No.99 of 2009 in O.S.No.4 of 2003 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, warrant amount is Rs.2,13,038/- but attachment was ordered to the extent of terminal leave salary of Rs.1,14,581/- only. However, it is not known with regard to the attachment orders passed in E.P.No.23 of 2004 in O.S.No.15 of 2004 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Parvathipuram and E.P.No.144 of 2009 in O.S.No.127 of 2005 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka. If the amounts, which are exempted from attachment as per the provisions of Section 60 CPC, are ordered for attachment, based on the letter, dated 18.01.2010, it is for the petitioner to seek clarification of the same from the civil Court concerned, but this Court cannot grant any relief to the petitioner as prayed for. For the aforesaid reasons, I dispose of the writ petition keeping open to the petitioner to move the competent Courts seeking modification of the attachment orders by releasing the attachment on the amounts, which are exempted from attachment as per the provisions of Section 60 CPC. Further, I make it clear that if any orders are passed releasing the attachment on the amounts, which are exempted from attachment as per the provisions of Section 60 CPC, such amounts shall be paid by the respondents to the petitioner on production of modified orders passed by various civil Courts. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 31st MAY, 2010. kvni