IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11388 of 2010(W) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JIMMY VARGHESE, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O. VARGHESE, PALLICKAL HOUSE, RAYONPURM.P.O., KANJIRAKAD, PIN-683543. BY MR.GEO PAUL, ADVOCATE. MR.SANU MATHEW, ADVOCATE. MR.C.R.PRAMOD, ADVOCATE. MR.S.ASHOK KUMAR, ADVOCATE. MR.NOEL JOSEPH, ADVOCATE. MR.M.B.SANDEEP, ADVOCATE. MR.K.V.REJANISH, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. BY MR. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11388 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an undergraduate holding a Diploma in Education (D.Ed). She continued to work as a resource teacher in the Inclusive Education for Disabled Children (IEDC), until she was deployed as a resource teacher in Sarva Shiksha Abhayan, in the year 2009 when the basic qualification of resource teachers in the Inclusive Education for Disabled Children was raised to graduation. 2. The petitioner joined the B.A course of the respondents and appeared for the final year examination in September 2009. When the result of the same was published, the petitioner failed in all the papers. The petitioner applied for revaluation of all the papers as per Exhibit P3. Exhibit P3(a) pay-in-slip evidences payment of revaluation fee. 3. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to take necessary steps to revalue the answer W.P.(C) No.11388/2010 2 books of the petitioner as sought for in Exhibit P3 and communicate the result of the same to the petitioner within a time frame. It is stated that the process for the selection of resource teacher in the Inclusive Education for Disabled Children is progressing and the interview will be scheduled to last week of April 2010. It is submitted that unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioner. 4. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to complete the process of revaluation. In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation and communicate the results thereof to the petitioner within a period of six weeks, if the application and the remittance of fee are otherwise in order. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp