IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No. 103 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.7.2010 Garja Ram …..Appellant. Vs. State of H.P. and another …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the appellant : Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The appellant is the writ petitioner. The petitioner approached this Court, seeking conferment of work charged status. The learned Single Judge has granted the relief regarding conferment of work charged status but declined the relief of regularization. According to the petitioner even as per the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 SLR 377, the regularization is to be done in a phased manner. The petitioner submits that his juniors have already been regularized in service but the case of the petitioner has not been considered. There will be a direction to second respondent to look into the matter and in case any juniors to the petitioner have been regularized in service, the 2 petitioner will also be regularized in service w.e.f. 1.1.2001. The needful in this regard shall be done by the second respondent/competent authority within a period of three weeks from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith copy of writ petition by the petitioner. The action taken by the competent authority shall be communicated to the petitioner within another two weeks. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice July 27, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (sks/grs) Judge.