IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 RP.No. 167 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN RSA.939/2008 DT. 04.11.2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------- GEORGE CHERIAN, S/O LATE CHERIAN, AGED 82 YEARS, RESIDING AT THADATHUVILA HOUSE, PUNUKKANNOOR, PERUMPUZHA, ELAMPALLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. MR. P.R.PREMACHANDREN MS. T.S.MAYA COUNTER PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS:- ----------------------------------------------- 1. MATHAI CHERIAN, S/O LATE CHERIAN, AGED 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT THADATHUVILA HOUSE, PUNUKKANNOOR, PERUMPUZHA, ELAMPALLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. 2. GEE VARGHESE, S/O LATE CHERIAN, AGED 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT THADATHUVILA HOUSE, PUNUKKANNOOR, PERUMPUZHA, ELAMPALLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ========================= R.P. No. 167 of 2009 ========================= Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009. O R D E R Heard the counsel for the review petitioner/plaintiff. I do not find any good ground for reviewing the judgment dated 04.11.2008 in R.S.A. No. 939/2008 which was dismissed in limine confirming the concurrent decrees passed by the courts below dismissing the plaintiff's suit. The case does not reveal any error of law within the meaning of Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C so as to justify interference. This review petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv