cp218.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.218 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10685 OF 2010 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr.Pahune Patil N.J., Adv. for petitioners. Mr.Uttam Bondar, Adv., for Respondents. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 22.06.2011. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2 It is not in dispute that the order dated 21st December, 2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the said order has not been complied within the prescribed period and the amount the amount has been disbursed in the month of May, 2011 and thereby the cp218.11 2 respondents have caused harassment to the petitioners. The learned Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the amount which is paid to the petitioners has been calculated till the date of settlement. In fact, the respondents should have paid the interest as per the settlement till the actual disbursement of the amount. 3 It is true that the respondents have not abided by the statement which was made before this Court. However, the fact is that the order has been complied and the amount has been deposited and the same has been disbursed to the petitioners. I find substance in the argument of the Counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners should have been paid even interest for the delayed payment from the date of settlement till the actual disbursement of the amount. However, the said contention cannot be entertained in this contempt petition, which is a cp218.11 3 subsequent event after filing of the contempt petition. 4 In my opinion, nothing further remains to be decided in this contempt petition. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of. The petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate proceedings for redressal of their grievance. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*