THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.589 of 2004 DATED: 07-06-2010 ORDER: On the basis of a report given by the petitioner herein, the police, Mogaltur police station registered a case in Cr.No.14 of 1997 against the respondents 1 & 2 herein and five others for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 143, 354, 326, 324 and 506(2) r/w 149 IPC. The Investigating Agency, after conducting a detailed enquiry, filed the charge sheet and after committal, the same was numbered as S.C.No.246 of 1997 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Narsapur. 2. During the course of trial, P.Ws.1 to 10 were examined and Exs.P1 to P11 were marked. Though the respondents have not chosen to examine anybody, they marked Exs.D1 to D14. 4. On an analysis of the entire evidence on record, the trial Court though acquitted the accused 5 to 7, found A1 and A2 guilty and accordingly sentenced them as follows: (i) A1 is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- (rupees one thousand only) in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month. (ii) He is found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 326 IPC and he is convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- ( rupees one thousand only) in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month; (iii) He is also found guilty for the charge punishable under Section 324 IPC for causing an injury to P.W.1 on the temple region with deadly weapon, and he is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- (rupees five hundred only) in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month; (iv) He is also found guilty for the charge punishable under Section 324 IPC for beating P.W.6 and is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- (rupees five hundred only) in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month; (v) All these sentences imposed against A1 shall run concurrently; (vi) A1 is also entitled for set off for the period if any undergone; (vii) A2 is also found guilty for the charge punishable under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- (rupees five hundred only) in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month. (viii) He is also entitled for set off for the period, if any, already undergone. Being aggrieved thereby, the de facto complainant- P.W.1 filed the present revision. 5. Heard the learned counsel. 6. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusing the judgments impugned in this petition, this Court is of the view that the said judgments of the Courts below need no interference. 7. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. 8. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said fine amount be ordered to be paid to the de facto complainant-petitioner herein as the de facto complainant is the victim and the charges against the respondents are true. Accordingly, the said fine amount, which has been paid by the respondents 1 and 2, shall be paid to the de facto complainant-petitioner as compensation as provided for under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 07th June, 2010. Tsy