IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11214 of 2007 SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH son of Sri Krishna Kumar Singh, resident of village Madhopur, P.O. Sohagi, P.S. Nasriganj, District Rohtas. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas. 3. The District Development Commissioner, Rohtas. 4. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas. 5. The Circle Officer, Nasriganj Block, District-Rohtas. . . . Respondents. ----------- 5/ 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for stopping the construction of road under Rastriya Gramin Sarak Nirman Yojna on plot no.126, khata no. 6 of Madhopur Mauza, P.S. Nasriganj, District Rohtas, as the land is his agricultural land. The petitioner in support of his contention has annexed Land Possession Certificate dated 15.07.2006 issued by the Circle Officer, Nasriganj and the Tax receipts, which are contained as Annexure-1 and 1/A. Learned counsel submits that on 07.06.2007 the official respondents started digging works without the consent of the petitioner and without acquiring the land according to law of the land. Learned counsel further submits that plot no. 126, khata no.6 measures about 3.75 acres and even as per estimate of the respondents it would be valued at Rs. 39,200/-. Learned counsel further submits that the State has filed counter affidavit stating therein that in place of plot no. 126, khata no.6, the petitioner has been granted plot no. 162, khata no.6 after consolidation proceeding, a photo copy of Chak Map has been annexed by Annexure-B. Learned counsel further submits that even from Annexure-B it would appear that plot no. 162 measures - 2 - only 2.98 acres and its value is Rs. 29,800/-. He further submits that petitioner is not aware whether an alternative plot has been handed over to him in place of plot no. 126, khata no. 6. After hearing the parties, this Court observes that the Collector, Rohtas would get an enquiry done whether the impugned construction is being made on petitioner’s land or not. The enquiry would be conducted after giving notice to the petitioner also. The enquiry should be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, after hearing the petitioner also. Till the completion of enquiry, alleged construction on plot no. 162, khata no. 6 will remain stayed. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)