IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14270 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. SANTHANAVALLY, W/O.LATE SARNGADHARAN, PANACHAVILA MELATHIL VEEDU, PANAYARA.P.O., VARKALA. 2. STANLEY, S/O.SANTHANAVALLY, PANACHAVILA MELATHIL VEEDU, PANAYARA.P.O., VARKALA. 3. SANCHU, S/O.SANTHANAVALLY, PANACHAVILA MELATHIL VEEDU, PANAYARA.P.O., VARKALA. BY ADV. SRI.VELLAYANI SUNDARARAJU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA STATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA.695 141 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, VARKALA.PIN-695 141 4. SUDHI, CHARUVILA VEEDU, NEAR MADANKAVU, VARKALA.PIN- 695 141 5. SUNU, BROTHER OF SUDHI, CHARUVILA VEEDU, NEAR MADANKAVU, VARKALA.PIN- 695 141 R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M. CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts 2/- -2- WP(C)NO.14270/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BY 2ND PETITIONER TO 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 6/5/2011. P2 COPY OF THE RECEIPT VIDE NO.518/A/AIG(PG) PHQ/2011 DATED 6/5/2011. P3 COPY OF THE PETITION OF 1ST PETITIONER TO STATE VANITHA CELL DATED 5/5/2011. P4 COPY OF THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT OF 1ST PETITIONER TO 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 9/5/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.14270 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th June, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. This judgment must be read in continuation of the order dated 6th June 2011 passed by us in this writ petition. 2. Service on respondents 4 and 5 is not complete. We are satisfied that it is not necessary to wait any longer for service of notice on respondents 4 and 5. We have gone through the statement filed by the first respondent Director General of Police. The learned Government Pleader submits that adequate and sufficient protection is being granted to the petitioners as already directed in the order dated 6th June 2011. On that day, it was specifically directed as follows: “We do, in these circumstances, direct respondents 1 to 3 to afford police protection to the petitioners for their life and person against any culpable and objectionable conduct that may be indulged in by respondents 4 and/or 5 and others acting at their instance”. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays and WPC No.14270 of 2011 2 the learned Government Pleader accepts that the directions extracted above in the order dated 6/6/2011 can now be made absolute. We are satisfied that the said course can be followed. 4. In the result, a) This writ petition is allowed. b) The direction in the order dated 6.6.2011 extracted above is hereby made absolute. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/