( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3708 OF 2010 Balasaheb Kadu Sonawane and Anr. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Shri V.B. Patil, Advocate for the applicants. Shri N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 20.09.2010 P.C. :- 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 198 of 2010, registered with Zilla Peth Police Station, Jalgaon, on 10.08.2010. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for respondent/State. Perused order dated 31.08.2010, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, below Exh.1 in Criminal Bail Application No. 786 of 2010. Upon hearing, no case is made out for interference or for grant of anticipatory bail. However, it will be in the ( 2 ) fitness of things that the applicants are protected for 15 days so as to enable them to approach the competent Court for regular bail. Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application for anticipatory bail with liberty to approach the competent Court for regular bail. 3. In view of the fact that the applicants are students, prosecuting studies and also in view of the fact that in cross-complaint filed by some other applicants, regular bail is granted by the competent Court, the applicants need to be protected for 15 days. However, at this stage learned A.P.P. makes statement that the concerned I.O. investigating into the matter will not arrest the applicants for another 15 days, so as to enable them to approach the competent Court for regular bail. 4. With this observation, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2010/SEP10/cria3708.10