BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.11191 of 2011 BOSE ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WEST POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAMASAMY Advocate For Respondent :Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, in Crime No.477 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner, who is the second accused in the case, has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the petitioenr and the first accused are working as collection agents under the de- facto complainant. On various dates, the first accused collected a total sum of Rs.25 lakhs from various customers in the presence of the petitioner. But the first accused did not pay the same to the de-facto complainant Company. With these allegations, the present case has been registered. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that absolutely there is no allegation that the amount was either collected by the petitioner or the same was entrusted to him. He would further submit that the allegation is that the money was collected by the first accsued in the presence of this petitioner. 4.Having regard to the nature of allegations made against the petitioner and the fact that the first accused was arrested and released on bail, the fact that even according to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ allegation, no amount was entrusted to the petitioner, prima facie, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, on executing a bond for a sum of RS.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties ecah for alike sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. without fail for a period of eight weeks. The petkitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II VIRUDHUNAGAR 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WEST POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. S.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.35116 rl/6c – 12.10.2101 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11191 of 2011 Date :11/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/