Crl.Misc.No. M-29974 of 2008 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-29974 of 2008 Date of Decision: 16 - 1 - 2009 Baljit Singh and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Amandeep S. Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Mehardeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Ms.Gurvir Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2- complainant. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by Baljit Singh and Gagandeep Sharma seeking quashing of FIR No.231 dated 26.9.2007 registered at Police Station Jaito, District Faridkot under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon compromise Annexure P-2. Ms.Gurvir Kaur, Advocate has caused appearance for complainant-respondent No.2. Jhujhar Singh complainant is present in Court. He state that he had lodged the FIR as accused had taken the earnest money in pursuance of agreement to sell and had not executed the sale deed. Crl.Misc.No. M-29974 of 2008 [2] He state that compromise has been effected between the parties and compromise has been annexed as Annexure P-2. As per the compromise Jhujhar Singh had received a sum of Rs.27 lacs. Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Om Parkash, Police Station Jaito state that on basis of compromise un-traced report has been prepared. ASI Om Parkash has also identified Jhujhar Singh complainant – respondent No.2. It has been held in Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 that where a compromise has been effected between the parties, continuation of proceedings will serve no useful purpose. Therefore, the present petition is accepted. The impugned FIR along with all consequent proceedings are quashed. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) January 16, 2008. JUDGE RC