'a^irtflyi^y&^^iBtpRirtrei^ ^FT^i®m<r^'t'"'%'</^'"'"'":":';W'ss?] SII^IIIIC^ ^<ll^6|<@ an^CTa'iRRicR a2iT3iii;ST**fici» \S3.» ! il'; i i' i B^ITW^lfcl SI^SW PETITIONER M.D. phrivastaya, Aged Occupa|tion-Rctircd Uppcr (Lectur^r), S/o Late SItri Shrivas|tava, R/o B-37, Krajiti Districtl-Bilaspur (CG) RSSPONDBNTS 1, State . of Educatioln Secretarilat 2'.. Directorj Instruct^n/ EducatiGai Dcpartaicnt Raipur (^ 3. Distoct BUaspur 4. Chief CoUcctoife.tc S.B Hoa'ble SIurIIPhirendra llishra. J. 12.11.2008 ShnAbhav Tiwad, GOUBS Shri Arun Sao, GA for th( Heard on admission. Grievaace of fhe petitioi Divisiou Teacher QII 9th Octob iacluded in the gradafiort Ust Teacher of Anne.xure P/1, mentioned at Sl. N6.349(A) as s F;fh<Ri':<fr?^)'1*li*l"r^ri^*'ci.'tiu''t'si'< <t? ari^isnSst •'" ' ?ersas ChliatdsRarh, Departiaent , DKS Btiawan, Through : Secretary, (School Education), •(CG) Kaipur Coiiunissiaaeri ;G) Sducation. Officer. iCG) GIoinposite Buildiitg, ;xecutive Officer, Builduig, BilaspiA- Vfit Petitlon nader Article 22& of the Gonstitutioa of'Iadia ;1 fQi- fhe petitioner. Statc, ter is fhat he was ;r, 196 L However, dublished OIL 1.4.1996 tttough his uame ouj doiiumunicated bv the about 68 years, Division. Tcachcr CUIiail Bihari Nagar, Bilaspur, PubUc Pcnsionbada, Zila, Panchayat, (CGV appoiirted' as Upper his na.me was not of Upper Division drt to iiljaye: beea. •N -, ; , : DistrietiyEdiujcgtion 81 y^^win^y!^<<w®g(w»i?(-t^'< •p. c^? /ti^, ^ {, 2 <f ^, •,,,,._^.^^ . *fracW^»Tf€&•'•'••••-"•••1-A':-V"•'"••"•7"-"@-S^|^2(|(Q<% sn^TSH^^ciI^cj.g} an^CTTOfi'ii* ?rar3ii^?i**ii* 1 ;! Promdtions prom(|ition Ofi&cer (Annexure P/5). vide order dated, l.1.1999. considered. The second 7.4.1999, hdwever,case offh4 ofexclusiQn ofhis name ia ttiel of fhe respondeats. The p| redressal ofhis gnevances petitiouer continued' inaMaj & P/G up to 20.11.2001. considered and ultimately, ihe Annexure P/7. He agaia (AtLaexure P/8] to the Instructions, Raipur and P/9) to the Director, Directo^ redressal of his grievances, y considered or decided tiU datedl thrbu r^pre; I have heard leamed Gpu^tsel for the petitioner. Undisputedly, dispute supersession rclates to tlie yea Division Teacher in fhe vear 2( petitioner did. nbt inipugn' his EVCH after retiremeiit in'tlie yi the respondents ui flie year 2006 .»nrat<»-fli*ii*f«l"^I^)i'(lui'i-5i'(! ^aif^Tanisf'""•"•' to the post of Rrincroal were inade |but case of the petitiQner was not list was published vide order dated petitioner was not eonsidered because seniority Bst due to inistake ou fhe oart ;titioner preferred ;represeutation for 43ugh Joint Dirpctor bn 38.1.1999. The: :sentafiog§'vide Annexures P/4, P/5 l-fowever, his i''epresentations were not [petitiouer retired on 3l8t July. 2002 vide representatian dated 19.4.2006 Cloinmissioner, Direetorate of Public ^esentatiou dated 14.1.2008 (Amiexure [ate of PubUc Instractions, Raipur for towever, flie saine Uave also n.ot been addressed repifesentatio] of fhe petitiouer regarding his ]|r 1999. The petitioner retired.as Upper i(|)02, except inakiag representations, fhe suDersession while he was ua. service. efcr 2002, he jgled a reDresentafi.hn befoi^ and 2008 agamst'his supei^essiOE ui •\;»wi^;iim'»'ii$t^wi»SR^ :;„,.;.-,...., (^•^.CJ^A/d. ^i.f^ ..___.... . ''^^^^^•••'•••••••••••"••••••••••••••^"s'stpiassio^ 3iFf^?Iiq^>i(^<tig<^ an^iwRMi*' gaii3ti^sT**i ^ the year 1999. TIie Detitionen wittmi a reasonable time. in aa1 in the yearl 2002 when hte repi] concemed aufhorities. TliCTefore, placing reliai]|i S. Pafnwsbscm. ajiS. afhers Vd, in (2003) 12 SCC^TO, m tlie) disoute of the petitioner regardtm.s raised after uiue vears when fbe aFter his retireineut, is hopel^s; deseives to be disniissed od Accordingly, the petition is disntissed No order as to eosts. ; <ri<ifc»41iii*f«l"^FIs'cRIuM^I't" ^i3^^3!^fK''w's ought to have approached tliis Court case, iramediately after lus retiremeat ssentations were nof considered by the •e on the decision'in tlie Diatter of Union. ofJri.Ola etitet othet's, reported con.sid.eiS£t~6piiuon;ofthis Court, the his supersessiori in fhe year 1999, cause of action ajrose anj& six vears ssly tielated and the mstaiit petition fhe groiuid of. delay aad latehes. at the admission stage itself. Sd/-^, DMEendraMishra ^ •• ! ' ^ liiW ^M( .1® 111 I!;