1 SSK/42 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3401 OF 2010 Shri Keshav Rambhau Gharat & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Shri Anant Rambhau Gharat & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. S. S. Kulkarni, Advocte for the Petitioner. Mr. V. V. Kanade i/b. M/s. Divya Shah & Associates, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 1st JULY, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Kulkarni and Mr.Kanade, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners and Respondents respectively. 2. The Petition pertains to recording of mutation entry. It is now a settled position of law that mutation entry does not create or extinguish rights of the party and the same is recorded only for fiscal purposes. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another V/s. Daulat Singh reported in 1997(7) SCC 137. 2 3. In the present case, the Petitioner has already filed a Civil Suit No. 164 of 2008 regarding suit property. The impugned order, therefore, will be subject to the final outcome of the Civil Suit. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is accordingly, disposed of. (R. V. MORE, J.)