IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.2131 of 2008 In Criminal Appeal No.254 of 2008 [Hinganghat Nagri Sahakari Path Sanstha Maryadit, Hinganghat v. Shri Sherali Nazirali] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri Apurv De, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 20th November, 2008 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the reply filed on behalf of the non-applicant. None for the non-applicant. On 12-6-2008 itself, this Court had indicated that leave to file appeal was to be granted, as can be seen from the order, which reads as under : “1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. 2. Issue notice of final disposal in application as well as appeal calling upon to show cause as to why by granting leave and allowing appeal why this case should not be remanded for fresh hearing according to law. 3. Notice returnable on 24th July, 2008.” Apart from this, I have gone through the judgment with the help of the learned counsel for the applicant. Leave granted. Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be taken. JUDGE pdl