IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16541 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 15, 2010 Mohini Kundal .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner was allowed transfer on account of mutual request vide Order dated 9.7.2010. In the month of August, however, the transfer order has been cancelled. 2. Learned counsel asserts that the petitioner has not been relieved from the place of posting and has represented to the Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab. 3. Considering the nature of issue, I CWP No.16541 of 2010 [2] am of the view that the petitioner may pursue her representation. 4. This petition is disposed of with direction to the Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab, to take decision on representation (Annexure P-9) within a period of two weeks from today. 5. In the meantime, status-quo would be maintained. 6. Copy of the order be given under signatures of the Bench Reader. (AJAI LAMBA) September 15, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?