1 915 wp 2389.07.doc srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2389 OF 2007 Bismilla Macchimar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. The President, Shetkari Sahakari Vyavasay Mastya Samvardhan Vikhri Wau Prakriya Sanstha and Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Nilesh M. Wable i/b Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the petitioner. Mr. G.M.Savagave for Respondent no.1. Mr. C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondent nos.2 to 4/State. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 922 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2389 OF 2007 The President, Shetkari Sahakari Vyavasay Mastya Samvardhan Vikhri Wau Prakriya Sanstha and Ors. .. Petitioners vs. Bismilla Macchimar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr. G.M.Savagave for Petitioner. Mr. C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondent nos.2 to 4/State. Mr. Nilesh M. Wable i/b Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the respondent. 2 915 wp 2389.07.doc CORAM: D.D.SINHA & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE: 16TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and learned AGP for respondent nos. 2 to 4/State. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the following facts: The grievance of the Petitioner in this petition is against the allotment of Fishery Tank by the Government/competent authority in favour of Respondent no.1, the period for which the allotment was done commenced from March, 2007 and was up to 31.03.2011. It is not in dispute that the period for which the allotment of tank for fishery purposes by the Government in favour of Respondent no.1 is over. In the backdrop of the above referred fact, cause of action in the present writ petition no more survive. Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders if any stands automatically vacated. Civil Application No.922 of 2011 is also disposed of accordingly. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (K.K. TATED, J.)