IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10125 of 2010 VINOD KUMAR, son of Late Shiv Ji Rai, resident of Village Lakhanpur Tal, Near State Boaring, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali (Hazipur) ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Executive Engineer, State Highway Road Division, Road Construction Department, Nawada, Bihar. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 5.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is that after the death of his father in harness on 11th of May, 1995 while working in Class IV posts, the group insurance amount of Rs.50,000/- was only paid. However, in terms of the provisions contained in clause 3(M) of Government Resolution No.4185 dated 13th of July, 1985, as contained in Annexure 1 to the writ application, further sum to the extent of 75% of the deposited amount with stipulated interest was also required to be paid since the father of the petitioner had served the Department for about 33 years. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner although had 2 represented his grievances by filing a representation dated 15.10.2009, however, proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, State Highway Road Division, Road Construction Department, Nawada, Bihar (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The respondents while considering the representation of the petitioner, if so require, may call for further information from the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)