IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29643 of 2008 DILIP KUMAR @ DILIP KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.8.2008 Heard. It is not indicated in the F.I.R. as to what was the estimated cost for the construction of its scheme no.48/93-94. The allegation is that the petitioner received Rs.65,000/- as advance for making construction of a Primary School at a particular village and made construction of the value of Rs.35,658/- only. As a result of which, the petitioner was removed from the executant and another man Ram Udgar Rai was chosen in his place. The statement made in paragraph-7 of the petition refers to a report submitted by the B.D.O. concerned to the C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, that the petitioner has made construction of the value of Rs.66.005/- only. The photo copy of the report has been produced before me may be kept in the present record. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. case no.150 of 2002. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha, J )