IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4684 of 2010 Begeshwar Prasad Shahi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 4. 20.07.2011 The opposite party no. 2 is present in person. An affidavit by him tendering apology enclosing a fresh order dated 18.7.2011 has been passed by the Incharge Director. The Court has gone through the fresh order also. The language used in both the orders thoroughly disappoints the Court coming from senior functionaries of the State Government. The attitude emanating from both the orders is that very well if my orders are not acceptable to the Court and it wants another order, I shall do it as a matter of grace to the Court. Though the language is certainly contemptuous, the Court does not proceed further in the solemn hope that wisdom shall be dawn on the author of the two letters. Counsel for the State submits from the order of the writ Court that the extract quoted from Paragraph-8 of the counter affidavit, more particularly, the date 14.5.2010 mentioned therein was an inadvertent error not supported by the document enclosed in support of that Paragraph. He submits that the exact date therefore is a matter to 2 be discerned from the records in terms of the fact finding enquiry permitted by the Court. The petitioner, if so advised, may therefore agitate that issue also in any substantive challenge to the fresh order passed by the authority in pursuance of the direction on the writ application. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)