^-•^"K^-^ •}.••••"" ^^> INTHE HIGH<€%3>URTQF JUDICATURE OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.^2^/06 s^ PETITIONER J^l ^^A^ ^* -Tejbhan Singh Kriplani, S/o shri Jayamal Kriplani, aged 70 years, R/o Kavita nagar, Raipur C.G. VERSUS ^_ Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /V w*t^WS yvq •«l«IC')^WT^Il:t<l<»,Rtttl'Hy uj.p. as^ ^2006 sn^sr'RR? (^tg^s) <>iiS»iq>fR-ii* WITSITinaqTO ?R1II!R •(flSd 311^91 24.5.2006 W.P.No.2521/2006 Shri B.K.Rawat, counsel «l>i«(n^'Ttt*iCTV^" ls'^1 '<Rit^;ii ^ <>iKl*< siAn Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. /'jdvocate General for the State. Heard. The grievaace of the p' applied for perraanent penc Aiuiexure P-l siace long back this regard and fhe niatter is TiansportAuthority, Raipur. For fhe present leamed c disposal of fhis petition wifh his application wifhin the st^pulated period granted by this Gourt. This luriited prayer is n<^ State. permit is pending before fhe R P-l, ttie R.T.A. shaU dispbse preferably withia a period of 4 ofcertified copy oftfais order b4fi)re tlle conceraed authority. With ftie aforesaid direi disposed of. foi the petitioner. ptitioner is that though he has. jit for a particular route vide [but, no action has been taken in. |stiU pending before fhe Regional punsel for the petitioner prays for direction to fhe R.T.A. to decide t opposed by the counsel for ttte The prayer is atlowed. It is directed that if an sjppUcation for graat of permanent T.A., as stated fhrough Arinexure of the same as early as possible week: fi'oia ttie date of production ;ti.on, fhe petition stands finaUy SP/FS/2005-20,000 Xi-HC-78 dW| '•«K1|«*l,tn?l<t1*Ka, _^_ (A/.P. 2-^-2-f sntsTwR'ii* asiiaii^sifWi* £Uu4'\ 5'/ -V-.-.4- In view ofthis order I.Aj aad I.A.No.5166/2006 for vacation staud disposed of. Certified copy as per rul^s hfeaTtnj .^/z « ilcxti <I>l<llCT«l't>iT>itW ^ari^rsntsi No. 5167/2006 for urgent hearing the case during summer , SdA Sunil Kumar Sinha Vacation Judge f''