IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-13426 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.05.2011. Vivek Anand ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) By this petition, petitioner seeks direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to take action against respondents No.4 to 6 on the ground that the petitioner is a tenant of Durga Devi- respondent No.6. A civil dispute is pending between them and the petitioner has obtained ad-interim injunction from the civil Court against Durga Devi. Inspite of that, Baldev Krishan-respondent No.5, who is son-in-law of Durga Devi-respondent No.6, threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. He filed an application (Annexure P-5) on April 9th, 2011 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala but no action has been taken so far. For the redressal of the grievance, the remedy lies under Section 156(3) of the Code before the Magistrate and even thereafter, he can file complaint under Section 200 of the Code and not by filing a petition under Section 482 of the Code. In view of above, no ground is made out warranting interference. Hence, the petition is dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 04.05.2011 neetu