lA IN THE HIGILCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. l £)3. OF 2011. APPLICANT PETITIONER ^yV 5^'.--: ..>."p ^S^>r T^-^^\ San^ Smt. Savitri Thakur, W/o. Shri Mahesh Singh Thakur, aged about 56 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Naveen Middle School Gudiyari, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR Smt. R. Bambra, District Education Officer, Raipur, District Ralpur (C.G. CONTEMPT CASE (C) UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READWITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT /? 'k^^^^ ^$ HIGH COJRT W CHHATnSGARH. BILASPUR SINGLEBEITCH : HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMARMISHRA. J. Contempt Case (Cl No. 153 of 2011 APPLICANT Smt.SavitriThakur. Versus RESPONDENT Smt. R. Bambra. Shri Somkant Verma, couhs^ for awticant. ORALORDER (03/05Q011) Foltowing oral order of the Court was pa§s«l by Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. Heard on admission. 2. Thepresent contam^ pdBlon has ()eeR prefemed on tbegHM^ by order dated 11th Dacembar, 2009 passed inW.P.(S)No. 7233 rf 2009, the respondents in the vwit petition including the contemnor wre-directed to decide ttie petitioner's representaUon, however, in spUe of submisston <rf reprssentation on 15th Mareh, 2010 vida Annexun C/2 hw griavance has not been remedied. 3. On perusal of impugned onter it appears that in the saklorder no time frame was mentioned regarding the consideratron and deciston on the representation to be submittedby the petitioner. Consktering the entirety of the circumstance, this Court deems it proper to flive opportunity to the peBUoner to revive this contempt petition after a period of eight weeks, if the pending representation is not disposed of within the sakl period. i 4. A copy of is ontor be sent to the respwtdentfcontemnor as well as to f the Secretary, School Education Departinent, D.K.S, Bhawan. RatRiir, Btock 'sa-tf^A' '^"" -.--"^' ^4 EduraUon Officer, Dharsiva, Djstnct- Raipur and tt»Joint Uwtor, Treasury Accounts & Pensfon, Raipur, Dfetrict- Raipur (C.G.). 5. Shri Arun Sao, teamed Govt Advocate for the Ste^flregiBnt In tte Cowt ateo assures this Court that U>ls onler shall be informed to the concemed authoijty. 6. With the above oteervatk>n, thecontem(A(»lifonisdisposedl of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge •I'.