1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 4156/2010 Ajeet Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP 28.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Biri Singh - for petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not involved in the matter. His name has not been shown in the FIR and also in the statement of the girl initially recorded under section 161 CrPC. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the matter. If statement is recorded under section 164 CrPC, truth will come out. Looking to the aforesaid, statement of the girl be recorded under section 164 CrPC. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application moved by the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is 2 also involved in the matter. So far as statement of girl under section 164 CrPC is concerned, prosecution will take action for it. After taking into consideration rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the bail application is dismissed. Prosecution may get the statement of the girl recorded under section 164 CrPC. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma