R.S.A.No.189 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.189 of 2009 Date of Decision : 21.7.2009 Shiv Ram ...Appellant Versus Gram Panchayat, Rattan Garh & Others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby plaintiff's suit for declaration that he has become owner by way of adverse possession, was dismissed. Both the Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that the plaintiff has failed to prove his possession over the suit property. Such finding is based upon the report of the Local Commissioner, who has carried out the demarcation. It has been further found that one Ram Kishan has filed a suit against the present plaintiff, wherein the plaintiff was restrained from interfering in the possession of Ram Kishan. The plea of adverse possession raised by the present plaintiff was answered against the plaintiff in that suit. Both the Courts have dismissed the suit on the basis of the aforesaid findings. R.S.A.No.189 of 2009 2 The reasoning given by the Courts below cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity. The findings recorded by the Courts below do not give rise to any substantial question of law for consideration of this Court. Dismissed. 21.7.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE