FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3697 OF 2011 "Bhagabai Malku Surwase @ Bhagabai Santosh Sonwane Vs. The state of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner Mr. V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondents. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 5TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal challenging the order dated 26.4.2011, which is impugned in the present writ petition, before the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. He further seeks direction to the Chief Executive Officer, to decide the petitioner's appeal within time frame. 2] Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. If the petitioner files an appeal/application, before the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, challenging the impugned communication dated 26.4.2011, within a period of one week from today, the Chief Executive Officer shall decide the same, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 4 weeks FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3697 OF 2011 "Bhagabai Malku Surwase @ Bhagabai Santosh Sonwane Vs. The state of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 from the date of filing of the appeal/application, after giving an opportunity of being heard to all concerned, including the candidate who is likely to be appointed as Anganwadi Sevika/Madatnis. It is made clear that while passing this order, we have not examined the merits of the case. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-