IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36763 of 2009 Ram Shankar Singh S/O Late Ram Chandra Singh, resident of village- Chhatwara Raibhan, P.S.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali. ………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Bishwanath Singh S/O Late Bhagwat Singh, Vill.- Pakari, P.S.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali 3. Dharamshila Devi W/O Bishwanath Singh, Vill.- Pakari, P.S.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali. ………Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 18.11.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this misc. application under Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 3.09.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali in A.B.P. No.1043/2009 in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.257 of 2009 for the offence under Section 304 B/34 of the I.P.C. The main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the grant of anticipatory bail, the opposite parties alongwith criminals are threatening the petitioner and other family members of the petitioner and they are also tempering with the evidence. The learned counsel for the State submits that anticipatory bail has been granted to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 vide order dated 3.09.2009 by the learned 2 Sessions Judge and more than two years have passed. The petitioner may raise his grievance before the learned Sessions Judge for cancellation of bail. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, it appears that the contention of the learned counsel for the State is correct. More than two years have passed. The petitioner may raise his grievance before the learned Sessions Judge. This application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)