IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 21ST MAGHA 1932 RP.No. 85 of 2011 ------------------- [AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO. 5393/2004] REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN,SC,CALICUT UNIERSITY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- C.PRASANTH KUMAR, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, CHALIL HOUSE THIRUTHIYAD PO, BALUSSERI, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI. P.K. IBRAHIM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 85 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 10th day of February, 2011. O R D E R Calicut University has filed this review petition for review of my common judgment in O.P. No. 15723/2002 and W.P(C) No. 5393/2004. The grounds now raised were not raised at any stage of the writ petition, not even at the time of hearing. Apart from that, the review petitioner has not produced any document to show that the University has rejected the enquiry report relied upon by me. Even otherwise, the reasons stated in the judgment for arriving at the conclusion are valid. Therefore, I am not inclined to review my judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.