( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8869 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.)NO. 7230 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra and another. APPLICANTS VERSUS Bhaskar Bhalchandra Jadhav RESPONDENT ..... Mr. S.D. Kaldate, A.G.P. for the applicants. ..... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [DATE : 22nd April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. There is a chequered history of remissness on the part of the Government authorities in filing the first appeal. The matter was not prosecuted properly for taking steps. It faced dismissal by order of the learned Registrar. It was restored on an application of the State. Thereafter, an application for bringing legal representatives on record was moved. That application was ( 2 ) also allowed. 3. In the initial process at the time of filing of first appeal, there is delay of 30 days caused by the State. The impugned judgement and order is dated 20-10-2005, copy application was moved on 21-10-2005, certified copy was received on 03-12-2005 and the proposal for sanction was moved to the Law and Judiciary Department. Finding all the situation, the delay of 30 days in filing of first appeal is sufficiently explained. Hence, delay condoned. Application allowed accordingly. [ K. U. CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE NPJ/ca8869-09