IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 30397 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 8.11.2010 ... Sikander Singh and another ................Petitioners vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. R.K. Kapila, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Ashima Mor, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. Sh. B.S. Mann, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5. ... K.C. Puri, J. Learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh has placed on record statements of private respondents, in which it is mentioned that they have not objection to the marriage of the petitioners. Sh. B.S. Mann, Advocate has also appeared on behalf of respondents No. 4 and 5 and has stated at the bar that respondents No.4 and 5 have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. So, in view of the above, the petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. ( K.C. Puri ) 8.11.2010 Judge chugh