17> ,6 18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF RC.REV. 2712009 MOHD. ISRAR Through: versus DELHI AT NEW DELHI t ,.... Petitioner Md. lkram, Advocate. ABDUL WAHID ..... ResPondent Through: MR. B,B. Gupta with Mr. Vivek S. Attri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER o/o O2.O7.2OO9 The petitioner had filed an undertaking dated 22nd May, 2009, Since there was a dispute raised with regard to payment of arrears of rent, the petitioner was required to file another undertaking. Though the same has not been filed, it is now agreed between the parties in presence of the petitioner, and the petitioner undertakes to the court that he shall pay Rs. 15,000/- towards arrears of rent for the period up to 31't May, 2OO7 in full and final satisfaction of the respondent's claim in that regard. For the period thereafter, there is no dispute that the petitioner has been making payment/deposit of rent. The petitioner shall make payment of the amount of Rs. 15,000/- to the respondent in. three installments of Rs. 5,000/- each. The three installments shall be paid on the 1't August, 2009, 1't September, 2009 and 1" October, 2009 respectively. The petitioner has undertaken to the CourL that he Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:25.07.2024 16:19 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified e would vacate the suit premises and deliver the possession to the respondent/landlord on or before 31.12.2010. He shall continue to make payment of occupation charges at the rate of Rs' 40Ol- per month directly to the respondent against written acknowledgement' ln case there any dispute regarding the acknowledgement being given' the petitioner shall deposit the amount in Court' But he shall not default in making the said payment punctually by the 7th of every month in advance. The respondent would be entitled to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner in the Lower Court' The petitioner states that he has made deposit of occupation charges up to 30th June, 2009, subject to the aforesaid, the undertaking furnished by the petitioner is accepted and he shall remain bound by the terms thereof' Petition stands disPosed off. vtPlN SANGHI,J JULY O2,2OO9 dp frK^}, cm - lY23qf q&/i rsl vn bl' K) 31 ,F p NEW DELHI 1s1 CPC) in RC.REV.2712009 ..... Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT CM A. No.14238/2009 (of the respondent u/S MOHD. ISRAR Through. Mr. Mohd. Ikram, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. B.B. GuPta with Mr. Advocates. ..... Respondent Vivek S. Attri, L ABDUL WAHID CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER oh 13.11.2009 The counsel for the petitioner/non applicant has handed over to the counsel for the respondent a demand draft fortotal sum of Rs.16,200/-. A sum of Rs.6,000/- is still outstanding fiom the petitioner/non applicant up to 30tl' November ,2009. The counsel for the petitioner states that the balance amount has been deposited before the court of the Addl. Rent Controller. The counsel for the respondent/applicant controverts the sarlle' Without entering into the said controversy, it is directed that the amounts' if any' deposited by the petitioner in the courts/before the Addl. Rent Controller shall be refunded to the petitioner/tenant. The petitioner/tenant undertakes to pay to the respondent the balance sum of Rs.6,000/- on or before within one month of today' It is clarified that if the ,uiaWt, no, made within one nronth or if there is any default in payment of future amounts as already undertaken, the petitionet/tenant would not be e'titled to time till 3l't.December 2010 to vacate the premises and shall be liable to remove himself from the premises forthwith' with the aforesaid clirections, this application is disposed of NOVEMBER L3,2009/pp IV SAHAI ENDLAW,J