1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4367 of 2010 Pokar son of Shri Balu VERSUS The Additional District & Sessions Judge No.6, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Anr. Date of Order :::: March 31st 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. R.K.Sharma and Mr. Manu Bhargava, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order dated 24.02.2010. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner under mistaken belief that the cross-examination was to be confined to the preliminary issues cross-examined the plaintiff only on the aforesaid issue and not with regard to the other issues, though, the affidavit, which was filed by the plaintiff and his witness was with regard to evidence on all the issues. So far as the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned, I find that there is no jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere in the writ jurisdiction. 2 The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it would be open for the petitioner to raise these grounds in any appeal that may be filed against the judgment and decree, in case the suit is decided against the defendant-petitioner. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/