BEFORE THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ‘ BILASPUR (C G) PETITIONER RAMLAL SAHU, Aged 57 years, S/o Bhaiya Lal Sahu‘ Resident of House No‘ 834 Arra Machine Ward No 15 C G State ElectrICIty BoardColony Korba(East) ’ Dustt KORBA (C G ) Verses. RESPONDENTS 1. Chhattisgarh Govt. through Managing Director ADHOSARANCHANA VIKAS NIGAM, RAIPUR (C.G.) Divisional Manager M.P.State Road Transport Corporation, JABALPUR (M.P.) Divisional ManagerADHOSARANCHANA VIKAS NIGAM (Transport'Incharge) Bus stand, BILASPUR (C.G.) Asstt. Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Sub Office Scheme No.5, Near ' Karshi Mandi, VijayvNagar, Jabalpur (M.P.) 5. Asstt. Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Sub Office, Raipur (C.G.) $ \b $,‘}$ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA‘FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER ORDERS DIRECTION DIRECTIONS Qv ‘g XI-HC~78 3am WW W WW m 2005 WW (13W) mwfém? WW§WW mwmm WWW éxwam‘m 6-7-2906 Mr. S.V. Purohit, counsel for he petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel awyer for the State/respondent No.1. Mr. Rishi Raj Kuihade, couns ifor respondents No.3 to 5. Heard. ‘ r-r The main grievance of the etitioner raised in this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution f lndia is that the petitioneryvas working as Security Inspector at Bilaspur Depot fM.P.S.R.T.C. The petitioner was working at Jabalpur Depot during the perio from 19-7-1997 to 14-1-1999 and during that period Employees Provident F was deducted from his salary. In spite of repeated requests, same is not ing transferred w Jabalpur Depot to Bilaspur Depot (earlier Biiaspur pot, now respondent No.3). Even the petitioner has taken voiuntary retire ent With effect from 315’ January, 2003 and as per them ietter of respo dent No 3 Annexure P—4 the petitioner was entitled to receive whole retirai ben fts Within a period of two months, but he is not getting a penny on account of n n—transfer of EPF amount by the Jabaipur Depot. As agreed by iearned counse for the patties, respondent No.2 is directed to transfer the EPF amount of the etitioner along with the admissible interest earned so far, to respondent No.3 w hin a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy ofithis order. in turn, respondent No.3 shall aiso contact respondent No.2 overtelephone for transfer of the EPF amount and on receipt of the said amount, retitai benefits o the petitioner be paid to him, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, he petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.3 13/2005 and l.A.No.1668/2006 aiso stand disposed of. Sdl- L.C.BHADOO Judge d u e e