IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11934 of 2009 SH.MANJIT KUMAR JHA S/o Indra Kant Jha, R/o Vill. Lalganj, P.S. Bihira, Distt. Saharsa. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also Mr Rajeeva Roy, learned Counsel who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant in Cr.Misc. No.52670 of 2008. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest in a police case, is under section 498A and other allied sections of the Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present case has been lodged at the behest of the persons who are inimical to the family. It is further submitted that the petitioner being the husband was all along ready and willing to keep the informant peacefully as a legally wedded wife. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the informant is desirous to live with the petitioner provided the petitioner keeps the informant decently and behaves properly. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that within a period of two weeks, the petitioner himself will go to bring the informant from her parents’ house and keep her peacefully. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in 2 connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S. Case No.453/2008 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is, however, made clear that in case the petitioner fails to keep his promises, as noticed above, it will be open for the informant to take steps for cancellation of his bail on reasonable grounds. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)