IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 999 of 2006 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 04/10/2005 in WP NO : 21033 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Smt. V. Laxminarasamma, W/o. Sri V. Subramanyam, R/o. Flat No. B37/F1, LIG Ground Floor, Baghlingampally, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The A.P. Housing Board, Gagan Vihar Nampally, Hyderabad, Rep by its Vice Chairman And Housing Commissioner. 2 The Executive Engineer (HG), South Division A.P. Housing Board, M.J. Road, Hyderabad - 01. 3 Sub-Registrar of Assurances and Marriages, Registration Department, Govt. of A.P., Ashoknagar, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. K. Jyothi, W/o. Late Parasuram, H.No. 2-3-508/C/75, Plot No. 29, Owasinagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.D.RANGANATHA KUMAR The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant is absent. Even on 16-7-2008 when the appeal was called out, the learned Advocate for the appellant was absent and in the interest of justice, the hearing had been adjourned to today. As the learned Advocate for the appellant is absent even today, the appeal is dismissed for default with no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 23rd July, 2008. _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR