1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.641 OF 1997 Prabhavati Dagdoba Shinde .... Appellants & Ors. Vs. Dagadu Gyanaba Pise & Ors. .... Respondents Mr.P.J. Shinde, Advocate for appellants. Mr.S.P. Thorat, Advocate for respondent no.1. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 4th December, 2009 P.C. 1. The consent terms signed by the appellants, respondent no.1, the original plaintiff and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Mr.Thorat states that the respondents no.2 to 13 are formal parties and they are not parties to the agreement which was sought to be specifically performed by the suit and he desires to delete these respondents from the present proceedings. In view of the consent terms, the appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 29th March 1997 of District Court, Satara is set aside. The suit is decreed in terms of consent terms. Both the learned Advocates state that the signatories of the consent terms are present before the Court. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)