1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9199 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9199 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9199 OF 2004 Ramchandra Mahadu Kurhade .. Petitioner. Vs. Vasant Kisan Bahirat .. Respondent. Mr.R.H.Sanghavi for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Sanghavi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the observations made in the impugned order that the petitioner will be entitle for the share of Sonabai, if any, as determined in the suit filed by respondent no.1 against other respondents and considering that previous application filed by the petitioner seeking similar relief was rejected, in my opinion, the court below has rightly rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10. I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order in the instant writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The writ petition fails and is dismissed as such. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)