IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 952 OF 2008 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.24730 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3032 OF 2007 OF 1994 Ramesh Ramchandra Pophale ..... ..... ...Applicant. V/s The Kankavli Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. ..... ...Respondents. Mr.Ashutosh Gole, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.M.S.Karnik, Adv. for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 21st March, 2009. PC: Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent. Application is opposed by learned counsel for respondent. However in the interest of justice and in the light of averments made in the application delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. 21.3.2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW APPLICATION (St. ) NO. 24730 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3032 OF 2007 OF 2005 Ramesh Ramchandra Pophale ..... ..... ...Applicant. V/s The Kankavli Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. ..... ...Respondents. Mr.Ashutosh Gole, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.M.S.Karnik, Adv. for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 21st March, 2009. PC: Heard. Learned counsel for the review applicant submits that the applicant had applied for appointment to the post of Instructor in the trade of turner and was so appointed. It is undisputed that the subject turner was not being taught in the concerned ITI and the applicant was engaged to teach classes in the trade wherein he was not eligible for being appointed. On the ground that the applicant was lacking eligibility for appointment to the post of instructor in the trade of fitter, writ petition came to be dismissed. By the present application review of the said order is sought on the same point which was argued in the writ petition and is being pressed in the review petition as well. For the reasons recorded in the order dated 11.6.07 present application deserves to be rejected. No case is made for review. In the result review application is dismissed.