1 Cri.Rev.Appl.St.No.167 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REV.APPL.STAMP NO.167 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.K.S.Patil, learned A.P.P. for Applicant/State. CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 16/08/2011 Heard learned A.P.P. for State. Even though this revision application is not on board for admission, but considering the prayers made in the revision application, it is taken up for admission. By this revision application, the applicant/State had questioned the correctness of the order passed below Exh. 151. After going through the order, it reveals that, it is clarified by the learned lower Court in para no.5 that, "it is, however, made clear that if any ambiguity is felt in reading evidence of this witness after examining the investigating officer, then this Court may review the question of seeking necessary 2 Cri.Rev.Appl.St.No.167 of 2011 clarification on the point in question. Accordingly, the application Exh.151 stands rejected at this stage." In view of the clarification given by the learned Lower Court, according to me, option is kept open to apply fresh. In view of this clarification already given by the learned Lower Court, application being sans merits, is dismissed at the stage of admission. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) AUG. 2011/cri.rev.st.167-11