IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22413 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 16, 2010 Lalita Verma .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel contends that certain benefits were given to the petitioner as a consequence of decision of this Court rendered in Civil Writ Petition No.15760 of 1995. At this juncture, however, the pay of the petitioner has been reduced w.e.f. 1.1.1978 and recovery has been ordered. 2. Notice of motion. 3. On the asking of the Court, CWP No.22413 of 2010 [2] Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Requisite number of copies of the writ petition have been handed over to learned counsel for the respondents in Court. 4. On request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up at this stage itself for final adjudication in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 5. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the matter can be referred to the Committee constituted under Orders of this Court while dealing with Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled `Smt. Sudarshana Devi & another vs. State of Punjab & others’, decided on 2.3.2010. 6. In view of the common prayer made by learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 2.3.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled `Smt. Sudarshana Devi & another vs. State of Punjab & others’. (AJAI LAMBA) December 16, 2010 JUDGE avin CWP No.22413 of 2010 [3] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?