1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3545 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax 1, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Suvarnayug Sahakari Bank Limited, Pune ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3557 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus The Laxmi Cooperative Bank Ltd., Solapur ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3559 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Solapur Nagari Audyogik Sahakari Bank Niyamit, Solapur ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3563 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Vidyanand Coop. Bank Limited, Solapur ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3565 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Bhagini Nivedita Sahakari Bank Limited, Pune ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3566, 3651 & 3652 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune ..Appellant. Versus The Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., Solapur ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3568 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Manorama Coop. Bank Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3594 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune ..Appellant. Versus The Vidya Sahakari Bank Limited, Pune ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3627 OF 2008 2 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited, Pune ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3653 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Arjun Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Solapur ..Respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3740 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Rajarshri Shahu Sahakari Bank Limited, Pune ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent in 3651 & 3652/2008. None for the respondent in all other matters. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. The issue sought to be raised in these appeals is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. The Solapur Nagari Audyogic Sahakari Bank Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.46 of 2008 decided on 16 th June 2009. 2. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)