1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.835 OF 2009 Tata Capital Limited ..Petitioner V/s. Manmohan Singh ..Respondent Mr.Rahul Mehta with Mr.Nikhil Mehta i/b.KMC LEGAL VENTURE, Advocate, for the petitioner None for the respondent CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. The matter is on the final hearing board. . The petitioner has invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short Arbitration Act). The respondent failed to make regular payment towards personal loan. The cheques were bounced. There is a clear case for non-payment of dues. The averments also remained uncontroverted. An Affidavit of service is filed on record. 2 Considering the averments made this Court has also granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). In view of this as all the ingredients are available, I am inclined to confirm the ad-interim relief in terms of prayer Clause (c) till the final hearing and disposal of the Arbitration proceedings as also until the Award attains finality. 2. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to take appropriate steps, if case is made out. 3. Liberty is also granted to the respondent to apply for appropriate Orders and/or modification of the Order. 4. The Arbitration Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c) only with liberty as prayed. 3 5. No Order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)