IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) / 2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER •<i -^ ny'" ^' /^ •^.-•'../• ,«'• ^ /^\o cv0< RESPONDENTS Smt. Ishwari Uike (Before marriage Ku. Ishwari Bai), aged about 49 ...• years, W/o Shagun Lal Uike, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently working as Asst. Teacher, Govt Girls Primary School- Korikasa, Vikas Khand - Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur ,- (C.G.) 2. Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of / Tribal, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) 3. Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG) 4.' Block Education Officer, Block - Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). •-5; ._ -. .J.-. j iSg^i^ SSB- % 3TT^?r ^T ^rNa' i ^^TT 3TT^?T sh*licft "s^f ^iwi, »ti1<H'is, fsicii^iy,< 'A'^.lS.)lTW3,c\'L?|lO sn^i XRV (,'^sy^f!) ?<<nw ^f?g 3n^f SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohaln Shrjvastava, J. 29-07-2010 Shri A. N. Bhakta, counsel fdy Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel advance oopy. Heard. Learned oounsel appearin^ petitbner is entitled to benefit of she having passed B. T.1. examinat) cost. It is submitted that the issuel longer res integra and the same Supreme Court in the case of 2009 ffll) MPJR (SC) 59. It is taken a similar view in his W. P. (S)No. 6257 of 2008. Learned attention of this Court to order datt No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying in the case of Asha Saxena (supra)| another Writ Appeal No.87/200q oonsideration of the case for grarft circular dated 21-09-1974 issued verification of the facts pleaded in ttf Learned counsel for the r4 petitioner would also be considered| t\t»o h^is Asl^a lurtUier chHlcn41T1 HIHC'lT ^ f^11^'^f'al^K ^siRnsn^s the petitioner. .awyer for the State/respondents on for the petitioner submits that the advance increments on account of |on before her appointment at her own involved in the present petition is no been finally deoided by the Hon'ble Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., submitted that this Court has also 4-der dated 06-02-2009 passed in [Munsel for the petitioner turther draws :^d 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeat the judgment of the Supreme Court and the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advanoe increments as per the State of Madhya Pradesh, after (e petition. uppn ^ Spondents submits that case of the on the same lines. »';»•-" '•* "•"^•K^ '^sf -<{ww^, ®Ti1y'iio,fsiciiyy ..^>.;.f'...S2..KV.:.^%^.G ^ITW sn^T vs Rw'h W^ 3?R?r st»*fiqi Tumsne 2-- In view of the statement nn|ade above, this petition is finally disposed of with a direotion to the re^pondent authorities to consider and decide the olaim of the petitioner for »h|i)ld'fl-f•qPTCl!4 fStS ^fe?R ^afTOan^i ^rant of two advanoe increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issueip by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe faots pleaded i|i the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrwastava Judge