:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.125 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.59 OF 2004 Dilip Motilal Agarwal ..Plaintiff. Vs. M/s.M.Ashokkumar & Ors. ..Defendants. Mr.N.N.Vaishnawa, Advocate for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED: 20TH JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 20TH JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 20TH JANUARY, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The suit is filed on a Bill of Exchange in the sum of Rs.50,000/-. Defendant No.1/2 is the drawer. Defendant No.2 is the acceptor. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s Advocate’s notice of demand dated 22.2.2003. 2. Mr.Vaishnawa fairly states that he has received a copy of an affidavit in reply. However, no affidavit has been filed in the Court. 3. Summons for Judgment is therefore made absolute with costs. :2: Refund of Court fees as per rules. For the purpose of refund, all parties including the Prothonotary and Senior Master to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate/Court Stenographer.