(«6/5‘Iw'g,/ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHATTXSGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ W. P. 1 S NO. Wy$ 2009 ‘ / Ajay Kumar Sharma, S/o late Lakhanlal Sharma, ag€d about 51 years, presently working as incharge C.M.O., Nagar Panchayat, Bijapur, District Bijapur (C,G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS x1) State of Chhattisgarh — through the Secretary, Urban AdministratiOn and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Ralpur (C.G.) Under Secretary, Urban Administration Development Department, D‘KS. Bhavan, Ralpur (C.G. Commissioner, Urban Admini stration ' Development Department, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G-.) Sheel Chand Jain, Office Superintendent, Nagar Palika Nigam, Korba, District Korba (ce) PETITIONER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDEA ) g HIGH CGBRT QF €3§§HATT1§§ARH AT BELA$?E§R SE : H§§P§53LE $RR£ JU$T£C£ PRETKPIKER DIWAKER ‘w.P.{s3 Em. 3393;2a0g WRIT PETITION UNDER AR’HCL‘E 226 OF THE €0§ISTITUT£ON OF ENDIA Aygeammm: Shri Ashish Surama, counse for the psfitionar. l Shri Sumesh Bajaj, GA. with Ms. Swim Jain, P.L. for the Siam. mam, ORBER gmmazew; Chaiknge in thé prssalt petitian iS to th5 omiar da€ed 29.06.2009 passai by the respondent No.2 whereby 1316 respamlent No.4 who is working as Ofiica Supsnm‘taadent, Nagar PaHka Nigam, Kor'ba has b€€n transfarsd that too, on deputation in place of me petitioner who is working as In chewge (3M0, Nagar Pagchayat, Bijapur Since 27.2.2008 anci there is no order m respect oftraxwfeming the pe1jtioner. Counsel for The pefitioger submits that 011 account of issuance of the impugned orrler, the petitioner wou‘ld be aummaticaHy shifted. and therefore the order is bad 1n the eyes oflaw, He further submits that the transfer order of the respondent No.4 carmot be. issued because it is i1: comp1ete violafion of Section ‘86 {4) of the CG. Municipaiities Act, 1961. I Learned courisel for ”the State submits thai 1et the petitioner make a representation to the resnondent No.2 and \ ’ that would be ciecided in accord ance with law. ?E‘E‘§?£QNER A§av Kumar Saazma Vewus RES?9NDENTS Stats of CG. 8r. (Miners In View of above, tha petition is dispesed of with a diraction to the petitiomar t0 make a rspresmltaiion to the . authmtities Within a patiod of tan days fmm tha date of r€ceipt of this erder anti in the eventuaiity of makmg any such representation, the same would be decided expeditiously Withhq a period of three weeks from the date {3f its receipt. Till fhen the impugned order shai‘l not be given effect to. '_‘ M z v Sd/_ ; K Pritinker Judge Diwaker r