G^ a-^r BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(C)No. ^^-^/2009 sim S^gli PETITIONER Durgesh Kumar Kotangle S/o- Shri Mekchand Kotangle, aged \0r) about-34 years, R/o. Sanjay Nagar, '..-"^^-'" '..•••«"^A-%--• Akaltara, Tehsil- Akaltara, District- ^€^^ ..••'^i ^ ^-^^y .-•^^::/'^-1-""" ^^ ^<e6' .<>«'-' ,eA--" VERSUS Janjgir Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Tribal Welfare Depari:ment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2) State Level High Power Caste Verification Committee, Raipur, (Tribal Research and Training Institution), Through - It's Director, Uniyersity Campus, Raipur Distt. Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. %, HIGH COURT_QF CHHATTISGARH :_BI_LASPUR WRIT PETITJQN_(CJ N0,4776 QF_2009 PfeUIlONER Durgesh Kumar Kotangle RlSePDlMDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another 2. Gb'w'rl (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Incjia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pres^nt:- Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. QRDER (ORAL) (Passed on.fhis 8tK day of September, 2010) 1.1 Qrievance o'F the petltioner is that the respondent No.2-Hlc)h Power tiaste Scrutiny Committee (for short the Committee") is not verlfying the caste certificate of the petitioner in spite of the fact that the petitioner approached the Committee and even the proper ' format is also not supplied to the petitioner. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of thls Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others and other connected matters, ^hereln ttiis 1 Court after considering all the aspects of the matter ahd after considerlng the law laid down by the Supreme Court in umpteen number of cases, in para 26 ofthe judgment and order has made certain clariflcations for verification of the caste certificate. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. The Committee is directed ta proceed in accordance with the decision of this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and other conrtected matters, as earlyas possible. :] Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19-8-2010 a i