IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3787 of 2008 Between: Handloom Weavers Cooperative Society Limited, Gajwel, a society registered with the Office of the Registrar of Co-Operatives vide Regd.No.19841, Rep. by its Secretary Sri Mangalpally Vittal. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Industry & Commerce (Textile Department), Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, repreented by the Secretary. 2 The District Collector/District Election Authority, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 Director of Handloom and Textile Development Commissioner, Apparel Export Parks, A.P., Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Director, Handlooms and Textiles, Medak District at Sangareddy. 5 A.P. State Handloom Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd., (APCO), Hyderabad. 6 Mr. D. Babu Rao S/o. Not known to the petitioner, aged Major, A.D.O.(H&T), O/o The Assistant Director, Handlooms and Textiles, Medak Dist., at Sangareddy. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus or others appropriate order or direction in the nature of a writ declaring the proceedings of the 4th respondent dated 12-02-2008 being R.C.No.1667/A/2008-B appointing Sri D.Babu, A.D.O.(H&T) office of the Assistant Director , Handloom and Textiles, Medak at Sangareddy a official person incharge to the petitioner society , as without jurisdiction, arbitrary, illegal and void and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and pass consequential orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.NALIN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3787 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 26th February, 2009 IBL