IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2010 / 28TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17692 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.P.HAMSA, MONY MOUNT, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (INT), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR-4. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No. 17692 of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 18th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that, he has left in the dark with regard to the purpose for which Ext.P1 summons notice has been issued, directing the petitioner to be present in person in connection with some enquiry. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, Ext.P1 summons has been issued in Form No. 22, under Rule 101 and this being the position, it can only be in connection with production of some documents, the particulars of which are not revealed in Ext.P1. In the said circumstances, the petitioner had preferred Ext.P2 representation seeking for necessary clarification. 3. The learned Government Pleader, with reference to the statement filed before this Court submits that, an enquiry is being conducted pursuant to the directions in W.A. 1477/2009 and the petitioner is one of the Directors of the concerned Company, against which the proceedings are being pursued. The particulars of the documents and the clarification sought for are stated as given in the 'statement' and that the petitioner could appear before the concerned authority, pursuant to the summons issued, submits the learned Government Pleader. W.P. (C) No. 17692 of 2010 : 2 : 4. The petitioner having now been told as to requirements for which his presence is sought for vide Ext.P1 summons, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner will very much appear before the respondents and co-operate with the enquiry. 5. In the above circumstances, no further orders are necessary and the petitioner is at liberty to appear before the concerned respondents and to furnish necessary clarifications. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. Since the date shown in Ext.P1 for appearance is already over, the petitioner shall appear before the concerned authority on 28.6.2010 or on such other day to be stipulated by such authority. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd