1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : J U D G M E N T : D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3770/2001 (Amar Lal Sharma Vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) Date of Judgment : 15.03.2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KAPADIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Hemant Shrimali, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 4.7.2000 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal in MA No. (Defect No.D-328/99) in O.A. 30/1986 whereby the learned Tribunal rejected the misc. application filed by the petitioner in which a prayer was made that the respondent may be directed to execute the order dated 25.10.1994 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No.30/86. Upon perusal of the impugned order, it emerges that 2 the said application was dismissed on the ground that though there is power left with the Tribunal to entertain the petition for execution of the order but as per Section 21 (1) (a) read with Section 27 of the Act, the period of limitation is prescribed as one year but misc. application for execution of the order was filed on 2.7.99 after expiry of one year. In our opinion, no error has been committed by learned Tribunal while rejecting the misc. application MA No. (Defect No.D-328/99) because it was time barred. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already filed representation for execution of the judgment dated 25.10.1994 passed in OA No.30/86, which is still pending and not decided by the respondents. While taking into consideration this fact, we hereby grant an opportunity to the petitioner that in the event of passing any adverse order upon the said representation by the respondents, he will be at liberty to challenge the said order. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J (A.M. KAPADIA), J arun