IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. R.S.A. No. 394 of 2009. Decided on: 16th August, 2010. D.P. Sharma. …Appellant. -Versus- Municipal Corporation, the Mall, Shimla. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the appellant. : Mr. B.S. Attri, Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. B.S. Attri, learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present Regular Second Appeal, in order to enable his client to submit a revised building plan in accordance with law. The needful can be done by the appellant within a period of four months from today since he is out of India. 2. With these observations, the Regular Second Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 16, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?