1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 5/2011. Janardhan Pralhad Shinde -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 12, 2011. Heard Shri S.D. Chande, learned Counsel for petitioner, Mrs. Joshi, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1 and Shri S.G. Jagtap, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4. Learned A.G.P. states that she is still awaiting instructions. Allegation is, petitioner under Right to Information Act got information that the work of bridge has been completed in the year 1996. Shri Jagtap, learned Counsel points out that for this 2 purpose reliance is placed upon the document at Annexure-B and that document does not show that the work is completed. With the assistance of respective counsel, we have perused the said document as also the document in Marathi styled as “Part-3 Certificates and Signatures”. Papers do not show that the work is complete or completed in 1996. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 have filed affidavit, that in the meanwhile the work was transferred to them and they found that design needed some change. In this situation, as cognizance has been taken by this Court as Public Interest Litigation, we permit the petitioner to file fresh petition, after obtaining required information. In view of this, present Public Interest Litigation is disposed with liberty. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd