..^^s^vlwtwm p.R-?'o:"^;cvsr^^...---"" ^T^:]..^^--""" c^^oa^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^>'72^— /2006 A. R. Thakur, S/o- Late G.L. Thakiir, Aged about 52 years, Presently working as Sub Divisio.sal-Qfficer;"' Forest Sub-Division. Korer, Distt. Kanker, ! Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Deptt. ofForest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Shri B.S. Netam, Presently working in the Office of, Head ChiefConservator ofForest, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS ••i.; WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2126/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. XI-HC-78 a'n^r^RFTR; (raTan^Tstiiict) Y^-'AO HI*1WI Sh*1|ct> 3:^''qFTRPr, ®Tn^<l6,RldlU^ ^...l-^P.3^.3.41^ ^R; 200 3T1^?T^ia<»i (^cil^qqiir) CTgTm Tif?cT an^r 26.7.2006 Heard Shri Pankaj Shri Vinay Pandey, P.L. By this petition the dated 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-1 Kanker to Raipur. Leamed counsel for the is working at Kanker and he per policy of Govemment the Oovemment, should be posted the petitioner is trained in continuation at the Kanker higMighting all the representation to respondent to decide the represaitation o]F whioh leamed counsel for the Having heard leamed the facts and circumstances the merit of the case, representation of the petitioner |in days from today after consider(nj accordance with law. With the direction Consequently, M.f8?.)P. disposed of. Certffied copy as per Shriv^sta^, Advocate for the petitioner. Spr the respondents/State on adwance copy. pe|ytioner has questioned his transfer order whereby he has been transfened firom Has res^ect grievanc|es No. res^ondent aforesNd dio rulds »bl^Fcl41-1TOTcff ff fS<S (KlW< ^i srf^iT an^r ^ietitioner subniitted that the petitioner'e wife been transferred to Raipur, whereas, as Ihusband & wife, who eu-e workmg for the ^t one place as far as possible and moreover, of cultivation of lakh sm^therefore, his |is necessary. He further submitted that the pctitionOT has alrcady made a >.l, therefore, respondeirt No.l be direeted the petitioner in acoordance with law,to S|tate has no objection. c^unsel for the parties and having regard to of|the case, without expressing any opinion ni No.l is directed to decide the an objective manner within a period of 30 lerfng all the points raised by tbe petitloner in the petition stands dispxed of. 2903/06 and I.A. No.7154/06 also stand Sd?- . L.C. BteefOO Judge P.T.O. v cb