H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Writ PetlBon (S) No. 3084 of 2007. Petitioners 1. Balram Mishra; S/o. Shri Bhajman Mishra, aged about 45 years, Assjstant Teaoher, Presently posted at Primary School, Chaidoria, Block Ghargoda, District Raigarh(C.G.) • 2. Sundarmani Kondh, S/o. .Shri Thandaram Kondh, aged 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Primary -Schoo!, Sumra, Block Ghargoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, S/o. Shri Goplnath Mishra, aged 43 years.Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Itfliddle Schoot, Raifera, Block Ghargoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Jailal Sav, S/o. Mangal Prasad Sav; aged about . 44 ^are, Assistant Teacher, . Presentfy . posted at Rrimary Sohool, . 'Gliaidoria, Block Ghaigocfa, District ;Raigarh(C.G.) : : • 5. Sanpy Kumac Bahidar, . S/o. Shri Vishikeshan Bahidar, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Presentiy posted at Middle School, Kotrimaal, Btock Ghargoda, Distrfct Raigarh(C.G.) •Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarft - Through the Secretary, Sohool Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan,Raipur.(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer; Raigarh, Distrjct Raigharh (C.G.) Petition under Artieles 226 ofthe Constitution of India. SinaSe Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sailsh K. Agnihotri .Shri Maneesh Sharma, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Pane! Lav^/er for theState/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 11m May, 2007) ^^WiS^W: -St- The question of law invoived herein is as t'o whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay soale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. (2) Learned counset appearing for the petitioners aswell as forthe State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitipn are the same as to that of. in W,P.(S) N0.5976CQ06 (Sushii Thwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was altowed vide order dated 07.11.2006. (3) In view of the above stated submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allo'A'ed in the same terms. No order as to costs. SatishK.Agnihotri Judge K p