IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 28 of 2009 Akhilesh Bansal and another …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. H. C. Pujari, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. Government for the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioners, namely Akhilesh Bansal and Niranjan Singh, and as such the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against has has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the chargesheet before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 02.02.2009 shall remain operative till the chargesheet is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 06.03.2009 LSR