... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.494 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.M. Railkar for the Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 26, 2006. : JULY 26, 2006. : JULY 26, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Appellant. The Appellant is the original Plaintiff. After having heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Appellant and after perusing the impugned judgments, I find that courts have rightly recorded a finding that the Appellant was indulging in money lending business without possessing requisite licence. There is no perversity in the findings recorded by the courts below. Second Appeal is dismissed. No orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE