IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 855 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 855 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 855 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 914 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 914 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 914 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.918 OF 2005 NO.918 OF 2005 NO.918 OF 2005 Teja Ram Chaudhary of Bombay ....Plaintiffs. vs. M/s. Shelter Makers and Ors. ....Defendants. Mr.D.D. Mehta i/by C.N.Gole for the plaintiffs. Mr.Harish Dangu i/by.KMC Legal Venture for defendant nos.1 and 8. Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/by.Madekar and Co. for defendant no.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. NOVEMBER NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 13, 2006. 13, 2006. 13, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. For the reasons stated in affidavit-in-support, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to the plaintiff paying to defendant no.2 a sum of Rs.5,000/- within two weeks from today and sum of Rs.5,000/- to defendant no.1 and 8 within two weeks from today. 2. Further, the Notice of Motion which has been restored shall be heard only in normal course and not expeditiously. It is clarified that the payment of cost shall be a condition precedent. In the event of cost not being paid, Notice of Motion shall stand dismissed. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J)