IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 10627 of 2011 Date of Decision: 25.08.2011 Sushil Kumar ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition has arisen from the correction proceedings to correct khasra-girdwari entries, which are summary in nature; the petitioner is still in possession and as per the inspection report, he was found in possession. He further contends that any observation/order passed in summary proceedings of correction of revenue entries shall not be res judicata in regular civil suit for declaration- possession-injunction, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file suit for declaration and injunction. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file civil suit. However, it is made clear that if suit is filed, it shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced from any observation/order passed by the revenue authorities in summary proceedings of correction of revenue record. It goes without saying that entries shall be made in the revenue record as per the final judgment in the civil suit. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 25.08.2011 som