PEEW’E'IONER RESFONDENTS ‘9 7 HIGE—E COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WK}? PETETION gS) No. 3216 of2008 Ramhaiya L211 S/o Hawalsai Aged about 4O years, R/o Villaga Rajga, Tah. -— Sakti, District Janjgjra Champa. (C.G.) . Chaiman, Coal lndia Ltd. 10. Netaji Subhas Road? Kmkata (W11) VERSUS DirectorCP. & IR) Coal India Ltd, H) Netaji Subhas Raad, Kolkata (W.B.) r Member Secretary, JBCC-VI (Joint Bieartite for the Coal Industry), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kokaéa (WB‘) Chaiman-eum-Matlaging Director, S.E.C.L. Head Quazter, Seepat Road, Biiaspur (CG) ’ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘aP Hon’hle ehri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Presant: '- (Passed onW 26 day of June, 2008) 1. With the consent ofthe paities§ the matier is tak. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is simiiariy situated to that ofthe respondents in the matter of Chairman, Centrai Coaéiields Ltd. & Others Vs. Jivendra-Prasad Tiwari & Others {Civil Appeal No. 171-4 of200Z). Learned counsel thither submits-that the said Civil Aopeal has been disposed of viée order dated 2?“ March, 2007, passed by the Hon’ble teamed counsel further submits that this case may aiso be disposed of in the same tenns. There is no opposition by Ieamed counsel for the respondent No. 4. . In View of the a‘oove, the petitioii stands disposed 0f in the same terms. No ordei‘ asto costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge GRAL ORDER en up for hearing finaily. )U Amit Supreme Court of India. 1 Sd/- Shri KKaiamkar, Advocate for the petitioner. ( Shri Vivek Shanna, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Praveen Das. Advocate for the respondent No. 4.