IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20987 of 2011 Tetari Devi, W/O-Kangresh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 21.07.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to make necessary correction in prayer portion of his application. The permission is accorded and accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of his application within course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 04.05.2011 in a case registered under Sections 365 and 366 A of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that she along with other first information report named accused persons forcibly took away the informant’s minor daughter for the purpose of marriage. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the victim girl was in love with one Durga Yadav and the petitioner does not have any concern with the aforesaid Durga Yadav. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 88 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)