IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 223 of 2006(M/B) Mohd. Adil s/o Sri Kamil R/o Lohara Line, P.S. Ramnagar, District Nainital ….. Petitioner Versus 1. Nagarpalika Parishad Ramnagar through its Executive Officer. 2. District Magistrate, Nainital. 3. Commissioner, Kumaon Nainital …...Respondents Mr. B.C.Pande, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Maulekhi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Advocate for intervener. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble P.C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. B.C.Pande, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C.Maulekhi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. 2. Mr. B.C.Pande, Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, interim order dated 08.03.2006 stands vacated automatically. 4. With the above order, CLMA No. 3763 of 2006 seeking intervention in the matter also stands disposed of as infructuous. (P.C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 03.04.2006 03.04.2006 A