IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5754 of 2010 NIRAJ KUMAR @ KAROO KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police Case under Sections 379 and 411 of the Penal Code is of the F.I.R. being against unknown and grant of bail to co-accused Rohit Kumar in Cr. Misc. No. 44938 of 2009 from whom the vehicle has been recovered. The impugned order of rejection notices seven antecedent of the petitioner. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Om Prakash, S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Trial No. 1982/2009 arising out of Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 64/2009. Both the sureties must be his mother and father respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds which shall be verified by the police before enlarging the petitioner on bail. 2 In the event that the petitioner absconds during trial, the Court below shall be equally at liberty to proceed against the sureties also. If the petitioner absent on a single date on which he is directed to be physically present, the Court below shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately so that the progress of the trial is not hindered notwithstanding the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)