IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 19106 of 2004 Between: 1 Dr.T.Suresh S/o T.Muddukrishnaiah 10-3-203, V.V.Plaza, Reddy & Reddy Colony, Tirupati, Chittoor District 2 Dr.P.Ravindra Kumar S/o T.Sankaraiah 237, Upstairs, Gandlametta Street, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 Dr.N.Venkatea Subba Reddy S/o N.Balasubrahmanyam Reddy Sravani Hospital, M.R.Pally Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 4 Dr. G.Ramesh Babu S/o G.Jayaramaiah 117, Kesavayanagunta, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam, Tirupati rep.by its Executive Officer, K.T.Road, Tirupathi. 2 S.V.Ayurvedic college, Tirupati, Chittoor District Rep. by its Principal 3 The Devasthanadm Educational Officer Tirumala Triupati Devasthanam, Tirupati, Chittoor distirct. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the memo dated. 11/10/2004 of the 3rd Respondent Roc.No.D6/13053/DEO/2002 as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article. 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.Meherchand Noori Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.Ramalingeswara Rao S.C. for T.T.D. The Court at the admission stage made the following : ORDER: The petitioners are contending that they applied for the contract lecturers/Medical Officers posts in pursuance of a notification dated 24.09.2004 for appointment in the third respondent institute. The petitioners were selected at serial Nos.8, 17, 6 and 16 respectively and that they contend that they joined on 08.10.2004, but the second respondent issued a memo on 11.10.2004 mentioning that the selection made for contract lecturers/Medical Officers on 06.10.2004 to the third respondent college stands cancelled due to administrative reasons as per the oral instructions of the Executive Officer of the first respondent-Devastanam. Though the petitioners contended that they joined on 08.10.2004, they did not place any material as to when they were communicated and when they were directed to report to duty and to whom they gave the joining report. In the absence of such material, the mere selection of the petitioners for the lecturers posts does not vest with them any right to agitate in a Court of law. The petitioners therefore cannot manage this petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 03.11.2004. MRKR To 1 The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam, K.T.Road, Tirupathi. 2 The Principal, S.V.Ayurvedic college, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 The Devasthanadm Educational Officer, Tirumala Triupati Devasthanam, Tirupati, Chittoor distirct. 4. Two C.D copies.