{1} wpst2169008.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION ST.NO.21690 OF 2008 Sushil Shimon Giri Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.R.K.Temkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.P.Phatke, A.G.P for respondents no.1 & 5. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE AND R.M.BORDE, JJ. DATE : 14 th February, 2011 PER COURT: 1 Writ Petition is taken up for hearing forthwith. 2 The petitioner has annexed the representation dated 18.09.2008, made to the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Division, Pune, along with the letter issued by the Institution, dated 24.01.2008 (Annexure `D' and `C', respectively). 3 Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are issued to the Deputy Director of Education to consider his representation in the light of the letter dated 24.01.2008, issued by the Institution. {2} wpst2169008.odt 4 We have perused annexures `D' and `C' to the writ petition. We are satisfied that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by passing the following order: A) The Deputy Director of Education, Pune Division, Pune, shall consider the representation dated 18.09.2008, made by the petitioner, in the light of the letter dated 24.01.2008, issued by the Institution, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. B) The Deputy Director of Education shall communicate the order to the petitioner and to the Institution independently, within a period of four weeks from the date of decision. C) It is needless to mention that the Deputy Director of Education shall consider the representation on merits, in accordance with law and uninfluenced by this order. D) With these observations, writ petition is {3} wpst2169008.odt disposed of. E) An authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the learned A.G.P. R.M.BORDE D.B.BHOSALE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wpst2169008