(^ p R, a'f^ [• ilNGLE BEMl .,.N-.^2.^^: f'^^w^-i^z^.. \.......^-'-)-h-^-f""~ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUR Writ Petition No. / 2006 PETITIONER Versus RESPONDENTS : y 1. ^ Rajesh Sharma S/o Shri. Dhruve Kumar Tiwari Aged about 48 Years, Employed as Assistant Grade-III, O/o Sub-Divisional Officer, E&M, Repairs and Reclamation, Sub-Division, Water Resources Department, DURG Residine at: H/28, Irrigation Colony, Mohan Nagar, DURG (CG). • State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR-491002 (CG) TheChiefEngineer, Water Resoiirces Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lmes, RAIPUR - 492001 (CG) TheChiefEngineer, Mahanadi Project, Raipur Water Resources Department, S.R.P.Chowk, ShankarNagarRoad, RAH-UR - 492001 (CG) The Superintending Engineer, Electa-ical and Mechahical Division, Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, RAIPUR - 492001(CG) The Executive Engineer, Heavy Equipment (E&M) Division, Water Resources Deptt. OCM-Chowk Irrigation Department, RAIPUR (CG) r ^^•-ff'18 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS BN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS ETC. XI-HC-78 <-II*IMI sh*ll<sh 'ysi 'iiMM^, sr^ww, Kwvy. .^^?;J.^.tr.-?/p£W[ 200 3ii^i 4acn ('l'il^i^) aii^r^rf^iN; (raT3n^?Tai*< SRTTWnferSfI^T <ni<<ftl<fll >lllilTifte^<Rl«l< ^?3TRiiT3n^r 21.7.2006 Shri B.P. Rao, Advocate for th| Shri Satish fiupta, Dy. Sovt. Heard. The main grievance of the pe| been gronted onnual increment inspit^ Perusal of Annexure P-4 shbws txecutive fcryineer, Meavy fcquipmen'l recommended the case of the peti1 Engineer, E <& M Division, W'Rt), Rairtur, respondent No.4. 1 neretore, without expressin^ petitioner mcy approach respond^nt bivision, WRb, Raipur and in turn, r'espondent No.s- Executive Enginee^, Raipur and pass appropriate orders two months from today. With the aforesaid, the Certified copy as per ruies. i^ petitioner. ^|dv. for the State on advance copy. rttioner* in this petition is that he has not ot passing typing exaniination. that on 3.7.2006 respondent No.5- (EdM) Division, W'RD, Raipur has already \ioner to respondent No.4-Supe>'intending ', which is pending consideration before any opinion on the merits of the case, the No.4-SuperinTending Ergineer, E<SM he is to consider the recommendation of ', Hefln/y Equipment (E&M) &ivision, WftD, accordance with iaw within the period of Itl peti-tfon stands disposed of^ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.