CRLMB4530/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.4530/2010 Sohan Singh and Bal Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 07.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Tanveer Ahmed, Counsel for petitioners Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner No.1 Sohan Singh Son of Shri Prabhu Singh on bail at this stage, hence his bail application is rejected. However, he would be at liberty to again apply for bail before the court below itself after the statement of injured Radhey Shyam is recorded. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, and looking to the fact that there is no allegation against accused-petitioner No.2 Bal Chand of causing any grievous injury, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner No.2, namely, Bal Chand Son of Shri Prabhu Singh on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.44/2010, Police Station Kanwas, under Sections 323, 341 and 34, IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his CRLMB4530/2010 // 2 // appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. However, in case petitioner is found indulged in similar or any other offence at any point of time in future, the bail granted to him would be liable to be cancelled at the instance of the prosecution. The bail application is partly allowed and accordingly stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//