IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.1566, 1572 and 1603 of 2002 Between: Sharitha Granites, Kuppam, Chittoor District, rep., by its Managing Partner J.J.Vishweswara Sarma. … Petitioner (in WP.No.1566 of 2002) M/s. Rich Green Exporters, Kuppam, Chittoor District, rep., by its Partner P.S. Chowdappa. … Petitioner (in WP.No.1572 of 2002) Shiridi Sai Baba Enterprises, Kuppam, Chittoor District, rep., by its Proprietor L.L. Uday Kumar. … Petitioner (in WP.No.1603 of 2002) AND Government of A.P., Industries & Commerce (Mines II) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep., by its Principal Secretary & others. … Respondents (in all writ petitions) Counsel for the petitioners : Sri O. Manohar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Mines and Geology This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.1566, 1572 and 1603 of 2002 COMMON ORDER:- These three writ petitions are ﬁled feeling aggrieved by the rejection of renewal of granite quarry licenses on the ground that the land in respect of which the applications are ﬁled is classiﬁed as “Adavi Poramboke”. I n A. Narendraraja and others vs. Government of A.P., Department of Mines and Geology, rep., by the Secretary, Industries and Commerce (Mines-II) Department and others[1] this Court considered in detail the nature of the land classiﬁed as “Adavi Poramboke” in respect of the same survey number, which is the subject matter of the present writ petitions. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology fairly admits that the issues raised in these writ petitions are squarely covered by the said judgment. In view of the same, these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction that the reasons contained therein shall form part of this order. Respondent No.2 is directed to reconsider the applications of the petitioners in the light of the findings and directions given in the said judgment. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30.09.2008 ES [1] 2008 (4) ALT 805