IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF ALGLST 201 1 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PNTO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1O89]Ji1 BETWEEN: Sri. Parasharam Bharama Pakhare. Age: 24 years, R/o. Muchchandi. Taluk and District: Belgaum. Petitioner (By Shri Srinand A. Pachhapure. Advocate) AND: The State of Karnataka, By Marihal Police Station. Belgaurn. Now rep. By S.P.P. .. Respondent (By Shri Vinavak S. Kulkarni, H.C.G.P.) This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to grant bail to the petitioner-accused No.3 in Sessions Case NT 0 i 3/ 2011 on the file of the I -- Additional Sessions Judge. Belgaum, (Crime No.37/2010 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148. 302, 109, 427 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code by the respondent Marihal Police). This criminal petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: - :2: ORDER Heard Shri Srinand A. Pachhapure. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Vinayak S. Kulkarni, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent — State. 2. This petition is filed seeking bail in Crime No.37/20 10 of Marihal Police Station of Belgaum District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report has been registered on the basis of a complaint by a person, who has found the dead body of the deceased. During the investigation, it was found that the accused are involved in the incident and the petitioner is also arrested and shown as an accused in the charge sheet. The specific overt acts against the petitioner is that he has assaulted on the head of the deceased with an iron rod and the postmortem report reveals that the death is due to injury to the brain, as a result of head injury sustained by blunt force. The F •1) petitioner has earlier approached this Court in Criminal Petition No.7793/20 10, which came to be rejected on 13.08.20 10. The charge sheet had already been filed when this Court has considered the bail application of the petitioner. 3. Hence, in view of there being no new grounds, the petition does not survive for consideration. Therefore, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE Rsh