THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE No.105 of 2010 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of the respondents in implementing the order made in C.C.No.289 of 2009, dated 01.06.2009, wherein this Court while closing the Contempt Case observed as under: “Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that notice under Section 239 of the Act was already given. However, the same is not under challenge. Therefore, the respondent would take appropriate action to see that no further construction takes place on the site, in accordance with law.” The original Contempt Case No.289 of 2009 was filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of the respondent in implementing the orders of this Court dated 31.12.2008 in WPMP No.38073 of 2008 in WP No.29138 of 2008, whereunder the respondent therein was directed to examine the matter and take appropriate action as per law. The said contempt case was closed on 01.06.2009 with the above observation. Now, the present contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent has disobeyed the order dated 01.06.2009. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The very Writ Petition No.29138 of 2008, out of which the orders in WPMP No.38073 of 2008 and C.C.No.289 of 2009 arose, was dismissed on 20.04.2009 observing as under: “There is no necessity to go into the factual controversy in this writ petition in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition was filed only in view of the pendency of the curative petition before the Apex Court and since the said curative petition itself is rejected now, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.” Since the writ petition itself was dismissed, it must be deemed that all the interlocutory orders passed earlier in it stand nullified. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in this Contempt Case and the same is accordingly closed. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 30.03.2010 va