BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14300 of 2011 1 KARUPPIAH 2 PANDI @ PANDIMALLAR 3 SEKAR 4 MUTHU @ MUTHUVALAVAN :PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 / ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 4 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRAB WING, THENI DISTRICT. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SEPANA @ SREE, Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURIAPANDIAN, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 prays for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC, on the file of the respondent police. 2.Heard Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. No representation for the petitioners today also as on the earlier occasions. 3.This case is posted today for passing orders. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the complaint given by the defacto complainant is pending before the respondent police in an enquiry stage. He would also submit that the petitioners were called for to produce the documents, but they have not produced the same and not co-operated with the enquiry. Since, the petitioners are not co-operating with the enquiry and no representation has been made on their side, explaining the cause for not appearing before the respondent police, anticipatory bail plea sought for by the petitioners are not grantable and hence, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 14/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 2.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI LAND GRAB WING, THENI DISTRICT. RP/19.12.2011/1p/3c. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14300 of 2011 Date :14/12/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/