1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6089 OF 2006 IN CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.11306 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1420 OF 1993 Sopan s/o Bala Mali, deceased through L.Rs. Sitaram s/o Sopan Mali, deceased through L.Rs. Mandodari w/o Sitaram Mali and others ... APPLICANTS VERSUS Dhanraj s/o Manikchand Munnot, deceased through L.R. Shri Premraj s/o Dhanraj Munnot ... and others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri A.S. Shelke, Advocate for applicants (original petitioners) Shri S.S. Bora, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 & 3 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 25th November, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicants (original petitioners) have preferred the present application for condonation of delay of 43 days 2 caused in filing Civil Application under Stamp No.11306/2006 for bringing heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 on record. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the present application vehemently and submitted that the present application bears no substance and same is devoid of any merits and hence, same be rejected. 3. Considering the averments in the present application and also considering the rival contentions of the parties, it is seen that the reasons for the delay have been explained by the applicants in paragraph No.3 of the present application satisfactorily and hence, present application is required to be allowed in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and 43 days delay caused in filing Civil Application under Stamp No.11306/2006 for bringing the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.1 on record stands condoned. Rule made absolute in above terms accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) fmp/ca6089.06