IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.16367 OF 2010 Between : Adapala Gopal Reddy ... PETITIONER A N D The Municipal Corporation of Nellore and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.16367 OF 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not considering the representation, dated 12.07.2008 of the petitioner for regularization of deviations pertaining to Flat No.103, A1 Ground Floor, Sri Sai Residency, 10th Cross Road, Magunta Layout, Nellore, as arbitrary and illegal and consequently to direct the 1st respondent forthwith to consider and dispose of the representation. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation, dated 12.07.2008, filed by him for regularization of the deviations pertaining the above flat has not been considered by the respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the flats of other persons in the building were regularized except three flats and hence, he prays to give direction to the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner with that of the case of other flat owners. 5. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 contended that the petitioner has not made the application for regularization in the prescribed form and therefore, the petitioner has to file the application in the prescribed form; that as a matter fact that in the same building, some of the flats were regularized by the Municipality when the flat owners filed their application in the prescribed form. 6. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has not filed application for regularization of the flat in the prescribed form. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file necessary application in the prescribed form before respondent No.1 within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, appropriate decision has to be taken by respondent No.1 in accordance with law on the application of the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J DECEMBER 19, 2011. YVL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO.16367 OF 2010 19.12.2011 YVL