^J^/CTS ^— E L/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NoJ3^^ /2006 PETITIONER .»4.^3 ^.- • ^ '..•••N£.9'"' ..••" -•••::^''^' Heeralal Thakur, aged about 35 years, S/o Shri Brisran-i, R/o Village Mudpar, TahsU Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS i^ESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, ' Through Secretary, Focest Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ^ ^l^^ <^ 2. Union of India, through Secretary Porest Department, New Delhi 3. Forest Range Officer, Charoda Baranw-apara (AbhyaranJ, Distt. Raipur 4. Divisional forest Officer, • General Forest Division, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER^ARTICLE^226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^r XI-HC-78 ffl^T^l sh+ll<n T«?•^iwid^, »Tf1yJi<i,fi<vii'yy o * *f»V*l*•(»*'>*V* *•*»*•»** ^ 200& w^fi w* (l^3^F) sn^r^lN?) gqTsn^TaiWf; OTBTWflfStTW^T ^"^. •12.10.20W Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advoca qiraferiW TiTR^fff teA rf^sre ^; arf^iT snS^r for {tie petitioner. [e for the State/respondents No.1, 3 & 4 on advance copy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, c^ tndia on advance copy. Arguments heard. Order dtetated as follows: unsel for respondent No.2/ Union of ORlAL ORDER (I SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. 2.10.2006) By way of this writ petitio|i, filed under Arttele 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitione)', has prayed for issuance of certain directions to the State authorities f{) fonnulate the rules pertaining to the constitution and election of the meijnbere of i/an Swaksha SanvV. Along with the said prayer, he has also pra; fed fhat the memo Annexure P-3, whfch schedules the date for election of th^ office beareis of Van Suraksha Samiff, should a!so be quashed. The subject matter of this Wfit Petitjon is exactly iderrtical to that of She subjecf matters of WP No.5524/20K and W.P. No.5525/2006, whfch have been heard and dismissed by Wfs Court vide ordens dated 10.10.2006. Learned counsel for the petititiner as well as learned counsel for the State/respondents does not dispute tl)iis factual position. In view of the above, this Writ IPetition is also dismissed at the motion stage on the grounds and reasons st^ted in orders dated 10.10.2006 passed in W.P. No.5524/2006 and W.P. No.5^25/2006. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge