THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.4271 of 2009 (Dated : 26-08-2010) Between: Sri Vadapali Sagar S/o Sambhaiah And another …Petitioners A n d The State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.4271 of 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been taken out under Section 482 Cr.P.C by Vadapali Sagar and Perala Srinivasa Rao to quash F.I.R in Crime No. 139 of 2009 on the file of Jangareddigudem Police Station. 2. Pasala Venkata Subba Rao-2nd respondent herein presented a report before the Station House Officer, Jangareddigudem P.S., alleging inter alia that he worked as Assistant Manager, Jangareddigudem for some time. Some TR receipts relating to the chit fund transaction were found to be missing. He gave an undertaking to the company that he will be responsible for the above three TR receipts. The persons concerned approached the company at Jangareddigudem and demanded for payment of the amount under TR receipts and that the Executive Director of the Company at Vijayawada insisted him to pay the amount covered under T.R receipts. The 2nd respondent being not able to put up with the pressure brought on him by the Manager of the Chit Fund company, consumed endosulphan on 30.5.2009 to commit suicide. However, he could be saved with the timely treatment. The S.H.O., Jangareddigudem P.S received the report and registered a case in Crime No.139 of 2009 for the offence under Section 306 read with Section 511 IPC and issued F.I.R. Hence, this criminal petition. 3. Notice to the 2nd respondent came to be ordered on 24.6.2009. The 2nd respondent entered appearance. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the complaint averments do not satisfy the ingredients of Section 306 IPC in which case, continuation of proceedings in Crime No.139 of 2009 amounts to abuse of process of law. 6. As could be seen from the report presented by the 2nd respondent, the names of the petitioners do not find place in the F.I.R. When the names of the petitioners do not find place in the array of the accused, they have no right to approach this Court to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.139 of 2009. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.26-08-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.4271 of 2009 (Dated : 26-08-2010)