Cr.MMO No. 23 of 2007 05.05.2008 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Gupta, counsel for the respondents. CR.MMO No. 23 of 2007: The petitioner has filed the present petition against the interim maintenance order granted by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, on 1.12.2006, vide which interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.500/- was granted in favour of the respondents. The earlier application filed by the respondents before the learned trial Court was dismissed by the learned trial Court, which findings were reversed by the learned Sessions Judge on revision. The petitioner has referred to the copies of certain documents to show that respondent No. 1 is not legally wedded wife of the petitioner and she is married to some other person. No final findings can be given at this stage and all these documents cannot be considered, so as to conclude about the marital status of the petitioner and respondent No. 1. The learned Sessions Judge has considered the facts of the case and allowed the revision. No amount as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner has been deposited. The petitioner is directed to deposit the amount before the learned trial Court who shall consider granting/releasing of the amount in favour of the respondents, if necessary, by furnishing of security. The learned trial Court shall take steps for early disposal of petition, if possible within four months from today. Therefore, a …2… copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court for information. There is no merit in the petition and the points raised cannot be considered in an interim order of maintenance passed by the learned Sessions Judge. The petition is accordingly dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Cr.MP No. 94 of 2007: In view of the dismissal of the main petition, this application has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. May 05, 2008 ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (BSS)