IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9624 of 2005 Between: 1 Islamia Educational society Rep by its Secretary, Mr.Khader Khan S/o.Makdoom Khan. 2 National College of Education Rep by Secretary Mr.Khader Khan . S/o.Makdoom Khan. Islamia Education Society New Bowenpally Main Road, Secunderabad. 3 Rabindranath Tagore Educational Society. Rep by its President Mr.Khader Khan. S/o.Makdoom Khan. 4 Rabindranath Tagore College of Education. Rep by its President Mr.Khader Khan. S/o.Makdoom Khan. New Bowenpally Main Road, Secunderabad. 5 Khader Khan. S/o.Makddom Khan R/o.104, Garunda Seshasai Apartments, Tarnaka. Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Govt of A.P. School education Dept Rep by its Prl.Secretary. Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Govt of A.P. Minority Welfare Dept Rep by its Prl.Secretary. Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3 Convenor,Admissions Edcet 2004-05. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to May be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing GO.Ms.No.57 dt.21-3-2005 and in providing in Rule 3 therof that in unaided minority educational institution unfilled seats would be filled up through common merit list by the Convener, Edcet as being illegal,arbitrary, without Jurisdiction and contrary to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of india and strike down rule 3 there of providing of such stipulations being ultravires and unconstitutional and pass such other order ro orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive and thereby the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. 10th June, 2009. ( B.Seshasayana Reddy,J ) tnb ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRR} THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.9624 OF 2005 10TH JUNE 2009