In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 1824 of 2010 (O&M) Azad Kaur ..... Appellant vs State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sarpreet Kaur, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The present appeal has been filed by the landowner seeking further enhancement of compensation on account of acquisition of land. Briefly the facts of the case are that vide notification dated 9.11.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act'), land situated in the revenue limits of Village Fazilpur, Tehsil and District Sonepat, was acquired by the State of Haryana, for the development and utilisation thereof as residential and commercial area in Sonepat. The appellant filed petition under Section 28-A (3) of the Act before the learned Additional District Judge. The learned Additional District Judge vide award dated 20.8.2009, determined the compensation @ ` 100/- per square yard for chahi/nehri and ` 60/- per square yard for gair mumkin/banjar kind of land. It is against this award the landowner is in appeal before this court seeking further enhancement of compensation. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that issues involved in the present appeal are squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R.F.A. No. 2453 of 2000 – Smt. Chanderpati and others vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 30.5.2007, whereby the compensation payable for the acquisition of land was enhanced to ` 200/- per square yard. Learned State counsel did not dispute this factual position. For the detailed reasons stated in Smt. Chanderpati's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 4.8.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge