Civil Revision No. 7839 of 2011 (O&M) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7839 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.12.2011 Chiranji Lal ...... Appellant Versus Mam Raj and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Kamal Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. ------- RITU BAHRI. J. Plaintiff filed the suit challenging the Will dated 10.03.1986 executed by Ishri Devi in favour of defendant Nos.1 and 2 and made a prayer in application under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC that respondents-defendants No. 6 to 8 be restrained from releasing the compensation to respondent-defendant Nos.1 and 2. However, the said application has been dismissed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Panchkula on 24.05.2011. Thereafter, the appeal has been dismissed on 28.11.2011. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and have also gone through the record of the case. The payment received from the Land Acquisition Collector is a definate monetary consideration and even if the payment is released to the defendants, no irrepairable loss would be caused to the plaintiff, since in case of their success in the suit preferred by the Civil Revision No. 7839 of 2011 (O&M) - 2 - plaintiff, the amount received from the Land Acquisition Collector can be refunded to the plaintiffs. In view of the authority "Smt. Kesro @ Shanti Vs. Gurdial Singh 2002(1) R.C.R. 360, the order dated 28.11.2011 does not suffer from any infermity. Accordingly, the civil revision is dismissed. (RITU BAHRI) 19.12.2011 JUDGE sarita