{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.36 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6630 OF 2004 Yogesh s/o Bhaskarrao Devare Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Kaldate, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.37 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6624 OF 2004 Jotising Jamalsing Bagul Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.V.B.Ghadge, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.38 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6616 OF 2004 Bhushan s/o Arvind Sonawane Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Kaldate, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. WITH {2} CONTEMPT PETITION NO.39 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6637 OF 2004 Pravin s/o Dashrath Sonawane Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr.V.B.Ghadge, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 08 th March, 2011 PER COURT: 1 It is informed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing for Respondent-State, that the directions issued by this Court in Writ Petition No.6616/2004 and other accompanying writ petitions, have been complied with. There are also letters received from the concerned petitioners informing this Court that they have no subsisting grievance as against the respondents, as the directions issued by this Court have been complied with. None appears for the petitioners presumably because the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the contempt petitions. 2 In this view of the matter, these contempt petitions stand disposed of. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/cp3606