II! ^ ^. 4-^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR s a W9.1 's^i First Aupeal fM) No. •^009 fD.B.] B ;\^ Appellant Fon-Applicant ^9:':^^- .n"=a v< ^•^:J' fvSK--" ^fi..-- Versus -Smt. Sunita Vaishnav W/o Shri Chetandev Vaishnav Qr.No.2/2, M.I.G. Rishi Nagar, Ujjain (M.P.), R/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Bairagi, 224 Anapurna Nagar, Nanakheda, Scheme No.2, Ujjain (M.P.) Respondent Applicant ,^ Chetandev Vaishnav, S/o Shri Narayan Das Vaishnav, Aged about 45 years, R/o Nurani Chowk Raja Talab, Raipur, Distt. Raipur-fC.G.) FIRST APPEAL U/S 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT ••»••<• HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARK: BILASPUR F, A._fM) No. 22 of 2009 u ff Versus Sint. Suruta Vaishnav Cbetajidev Vaishnav DB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri '& Hon'ble Shri Rajeshwai' Lal Jhanwar, Shri Arun Shukla, Advocate for the appeUant. Shri Atul Pandey, Advocate for the respondent. ( Passed on ttus 22nd day ofjanuaiy, 2010 ) 1. The ruatter is ordered in tenns of the setfleinent before the luediator. 2. A copy of the settlement before the niediatbr shall be a part of fhis order. | §((/_ R.L. Jhaiiwar SdA Judge Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -^, Tlialair