IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 30079 of 1995 Between: 1 K.V.Subba Reddy S/o Ramkotaiah R/o 5-75, Bhavaninagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. 2 K.Mandan Mohan Rao S/o Ramkotaiah R/o 5-75, Bhavaninagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. 3 S. Penta Reddy S/o Anantha Reddy R/o H.No. 3-362/2, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. 4 C. Mohan Reddy S/o Ramalinga Reddy R/o Plot No. 84, Kranthi Colony, Medpally, Uppal, Hyderabad-39. 5 K.Punesh S/o Yellaiah R/o 18-2-178/1, Junagampet, Falakmunam, Hyderabad. 6 K. Govardhan S/o Kubera R/o 4-7-788, Essamiyabazar, Hyderabad. 7 T. Mariamma D/o Balaguravaiah Hyderabad. 8 S. Thersa S/o S. Simon Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Director General, Telecommunications, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi. 2 The Cheif General Manager, Telecommunications A.P. Circle, Nampally Road, Abids, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, Order or directions in the nature of a writ directing the 2nd respondent to pay the petitioners herein commission at the rates prescribed by the Department of Telecommunications vide its letter no.6-5-/87-PHB dated 1.9.89 and Lr.No.6-1/9-PHB dated 2.5.1991 with effect from 1.9.89 and 1.5.91 respectively by applying the same and taking into account the total unit calls of the petitioners separately instead of pooling the total calls of PCO/and paying proportionate commission with all consequential benefits such as arrears of commission and interest there on. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VELLuri VENKATESWARA RAO (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.Rajasekara Reddy,CGSC The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.30079 OF 1995 ORDER: None appears for the petitioners. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the matter has become infructuous as there is change in the commission rates to the P.C.Os. Recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ______________ (N.V.RAMANA,J) DT.30.9.2004. MDAA/SVV. Copy to: 1 The Director General, Telecommunications, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi. 2 The Cheif General Manager, Telecommunications A.P. Circle, Nampally Road, Abids, Hyderabad. 3. Two C.D.copies.