1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1636 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Smt. Nishita Mhatre, & Shri M. T. Joshi, JJ. Date : 26th July, 2011 Shri Rajendra Deshmukh Advocate, for petitioner. Shri V.B. Ghatge, AGP for Respondents.. 2 and 3. -------- 1. The petitioner was working as a Naib Tahsildar on probation, with the State. His services were terminated as he had not passed the departmental examination within the prescribed period. The petitioner's Original Application has been dismissed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad Bench. 2. We have considered rule 6 of the Rules applicable to the service conditions of the Naib Tahsildar and the impugned order. 2 3. In our opinion, the Tribunal has interpreted the rule, correctly and, therefore, there is no need to interfere with the impugned order. The contention of the learned Advocate for the petitioner that that since other candidates have been permitted to appear for the examination beyond the chances prescribed in the rules, the petitioner also ought to be given this opportunity, is not acceptable. The petitioner ought to have passed the examination within the prescribed period and merely because some others have been extended this opportunity, which was not in accordance with the rules, it would not mean that the petitioner should be permitted these chances beyond what is prescribed under the rules. Petition rejected. (M.T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) pnd/wp1636.10