((-1-)) MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.659 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLN. NO.3466 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLN. NO.3466 OF 2006 N.G.Moone Applicant versus Jayantilal J. Kothari Respondent Mandar Goswami for applicant. Sagle, APP present CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 7th April 2008 PC : 1. It appears that the office has wrongly noted that Mr.Goswami has entered note of appearance for respondent no.1. Instead, the Advocate Mr.Goswami has entered appearance for the applicant replacing the appearance of Advocate Nalawade as panel counsel. 2. The respondent no.1 has been served as per the affidavit of service filed by the applicant. In spite of service, none appears for the respondent no.1 who is the contesting respondent. ((-2-)) MST No reply has been filed to counter the assertions made in this application. For the reasons mentioned in the application being sufficient cause, the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)