IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGA|itfl AT BILASPUR U-Lc CRIMINAL REVISION NOJ^C / 2000 APPLICANTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Parctesh Ram S/o Bsruram Kosaria aged about 60 years Rajesh Kumar S/o Pardeshi ram Kosaria aged about 30 years Basarth Kumar Sfo Pardeshi ram Kosaria aged about 25 years Fuleshwari Bai W/o R-akash Chand Kosaria aged aboift 30 yrs Rohini Bai W/o Pardesh ram Kosaria aged about 58 years Kanti Bai W/o Bresh Kumar Kosaria aged about 25 years fa R/o \411age Aasra Tehsil Balod. Qst: Durg-(Cgh) Versus State of chhattisgarh , , RESPONDENTS : ^ ^/y CRIMINAL REVISION U/S 397 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL ,. ^**0 PROCEDURE" ^L—^:_——~ —- ^l ^L<.<a5^^>:-L^t^.^ ^c^ •y&] ~-qr?n^{, -^iNrqcg, 'i^TOy .~ ^ .^ff•)rfd^f W^^m'^'(^".'f^ ""'^ 200 | ^...........(^^^^,^.......... 3TF^T'^T 't^t^^ni^T ^"RW^fi^ 28-5-2001 s/- i (-^ Shri P.Diwakar for the i Pstition of C.^. P2-^enfedO!2..J applicanfcs* Shri Gautam Bhadilri iy^A by SAri...lS>hO^^ ri t)^ ah^cked H^\ •\ for the State. Parties are heard* Learned couns&L forthe a^plicants submits that the wife, accor4ir(g to the instructions, wants to ec(me back and stay with the husband and only reason the applicant wa4ted to recall the.wife as a witness^ From the appli cation filed |applicant, so also from the o|rder e^ |passed by the court below, itj does" not appear that such an argum|ent was raised b^fore the court belowie The applicant is still freje to make ja detailed application giving |and thepurpose for which the |necalled« If such an applica-(;ion is filed before |fche court below, the ®meshal|. be heard and decided pn its own merits without bei(ig influenced by the ^arlier order of rejection. The petition is dismissed ^ith the liberty aforesaid. \ _C^...r^__ ±oda^f_ ^Fife7fN ^TPT^Tf ^ fe^ *<^T^R ^^f^rR ^n^i for this ^ v\ by tla?teiT^ PQtWor, chect'ec', ^^ ^^Cesj ^Gl^for, ^^ ^€WdQf it.^ ,u the reasons ^itness.is to be Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge [T[t^^fe4