IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16629 of 2011 Uday Bhan Ray, S/O Shree Jay Prakash Narayan Ray, Resident of Village- Nikhati Khurd, P.O. Nikhati Kalam, P.S. Ragunathpur, District- Siwan. --------------Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi. 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pupri at Sitamarhi-cum- investigating Officer. 6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar, Sitamarhi. --------------Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 23.09.2011 Heard Mr. Navendu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anand Kumar, learned A.C. to A.A.G. 2 for the respondents. The present writ petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation has been filed for quashing the letter contained in Memo No. 131/N.G.O. dated 1.3.2011 issued by respondent no. 3 by which certain directions with regard to investigation of Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 595 of 2010 have been issued by the Director General of Police, Bihar to the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the materials on record, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has adequate remedy for the 2 redressal of his grievances under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Thus, he is not left remediless. Further, for such matters the Court would not interfere under its extraordinary prerogative writ jurisdiction treating it to be a Public Interest Litigation. For the reasons aforesaid there is no merit in the present writ petition and the same is dismissed. The petitioner is left to his own remedy in accordance with law. Anand Kr. (S. K. Katriar, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)