HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO W.P. No. 7445 of 2011 DATED: 30.03.2011 Between: Nagaraju Musini .. Petitioner And 1. The Govt. of A.P. 2. The Director General of Police 3. The District Collector 4. Superintendent of Police 5. S.H.O 6. Sanjanapu Ramachandar .. Respondents O R D E R:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) The petitioner asserts that he is studying MBA at Lokamanya Tilak College of Business Management, Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District, during the course of which, he has developed love and affection towards the alleged detenue – Uma Maheswari, who is also studying MBA in the same college, and both of them have voluntarily agreed to marry each other, and accordingly, their marriage took place on 10.12.2010 at Samaj Mandir, Arya Samaja Branch, Suryanagar, Hyderabad. While so, the petitioner states that the father of the detenue, lodged a complaint about the missing of his daughter, based on which, the 5th respondent-Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, registered a case in Cr.No.53 of 2011. Now, the petitioner’s grievance is that on 20.02.2011, the father of the detenue, having come to know of their marriage, took away his daughter from his house forcefully and high-handedly and detained her in his custody illegally. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents to produce his wife. Today, the police have produced the alleged detenue before us and the 6th respondent, who is the father of the detenue, is also present. We have examined the detenue and recorded her statement wherein she has stated that though she accepted the marriage, she is presently living along with her father as per her own accord and she is not in illegal custody. In view of the statement made by the alleged detenue that she is staying with his father as per her own will and wish, we are of the opinion that the alleged detenue is not in illegal custody of her father. Hence, the writ petition is closed. However, it is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy for restitution of conjugal rights or any other remedies, before appropriate forum. No order as to costs. ________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J 30.03.2011 __________________ V. SURI APPA RAO, J bcj