1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2693 of 2008 Gajanan Kisan Metkar Vs. State of Mah. & Others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM: D. D. SINHA & C. L. PANGARKAR JJ. Dated: 27 th June, 2008. Heard Shri Kitey learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Patil learned counsel for respondent No. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the present petition the petitioner is claiming benefit of the Government Resolution dated 24.01.1990 since the petitioner was selected and appointed on the post of Gramsevak prior to 09.02.1988 and at later point of time the appointment was 2 discontinued. Counsel for the petitioner states that issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court dated 01.02.08 and, therefore, appropriate directions for the reasons stated by this Court in order dated 01.02.08 may kindly be given. Shri Patil learned counsel for respondent No.3 does not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. In the circumstances we dispose of the petition with liberty to approach respondent No.3 by filing representation, Competent Authority to take decision within 4 weeks according to law and procedure applicable in this regard, including the decision of this Court dated 01.02.2008 in Writ petition no. 400 of 2008 if the law laid down by this Court in the said decision is applicable. With these observations writ petition disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE svk