^ M \ ^ ^ \ Vi* ^mIj €^ \. N dt^ I s^ ^ '^ ^ ^ :. "^. ^v^ viS^C \"e^ ^;.:.^:.< \° '\~^^ '^^:..^^ '^°^\ ^ '^ ^ ^' «^ i ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ <" © o ^2r •y ^ I ^as: 1 YteM^ ^^^€^k^ HEGH COURT OP CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON?BLB MR. JUSTICE PMTINKER DEWAKER PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS W.PJSt.NO. 6051/2011 Ritesh Kumar Maithua versus StateofC.G. 85 Othcrs Shri Sunil Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDI^ ORDBR (13.10.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that his sister late Ku. M.K.Maithus died on 10.10.2010 while she was serving as ANM at CHC, Khursipar. According to the counsel for the petitioner, dues of his sister late Ku. M.K.Maithus have not been paid to the petitioner or any of his family members where as under the law, the respondents are obliged to pay the entire dues. It has been informed by the petitioner that number of his representations are pending before the resps. 4 85 5 but no orders have been passed. Counsel for the petitioner submits that purpose of filing this petition would be served if direction is issued to the resp. no.4 to pass appropriate order in respect of payment of dues of late Ku. M.K.Maithus. State counsel submits that let the petitioner make a fresh representation to the resp. No.4 giving the copy to resp. No.5 and in turn appropriate orders would be passed by the authority concemed. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a detailed representation to resp. No.4 after giving copy to resp. No.5 within three weeks from today and in tum the resps. No.4 or 5 shall pass appropriate order. It is made clear that this court has not expreased any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. - - -- Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge