IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1102 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9318/2008 Dated 19/05/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): WRIT PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------- T.V.JOSEPH,AGED 59 YEARS,W/O.VARKEY, THEKKEL HOUSE,MUTHALAKODAM,THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI-685605. BY ADVS. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN SMT.S.LEENA RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------------- J. MAHALAKSHMI MENON,AGE(NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),S/O.(NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E),KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695039. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. R. RENJITH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DS Con.Case(C).No. 1102 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS ANNEXURE-A: THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT:19-05-2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P(C) 9318/2008. ANNEXURE-B: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD ISSUED BY THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT OF EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE-A JUDGMENT BY THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-C: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LAWYER'S NOTICE DATED 08-08-2011 ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-D: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD ISSUED BY THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE-C NOTICE BY THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE DS K.T.SANKARAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cont. Case No. 1102 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011 O R D E R The petitioner alleged that the respondent wilfully and deliberately failed to comply with the direction contained in the judgment dated 19-05-2010 in W.P.(C)No.9318/2008. 2. Learned Government Pleader submitted that a cheque for Rs. 84,780/- was issued in favour of the petitioner in compliance with the directions contained in the judgment. It is also submitted that though there was some delay in disbursing the amount, the direction has been belatedly complied with. 3. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is closed. C.O.C.No.1102/2011 :- 2 :- If the amount is not realized by the petitioner, the petitioner would be entitled to file a memo in the Contempt Case, in which case, the Contempt Case shall stand revived. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. ds