R \g / Ramji Tiwari, S/o. Late Shri Narmada Prasad Tiwari, Aged about 59 years, Haadmastsr, posted at Govt. Midd‘ie Schooi, Nawagaon, Block 8a Tahsil Simga, Rajpur (C.G.). VERSUS /1.' State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). l //2. The Director, Public InstructionS, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Director, Pablic Instructions, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The District Education Officer, District Raipur (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Tahsil Simga, District Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETETEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 6F THE EONSTITUTION OF XNDEA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned above in the cause title. 1 , IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. § /2011 PETITIONER ‘ 3" y’SPONDENTs / 3a W, m, ‘ WI ;/ Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, .pe 0 en Shri Y. t3, makur, Dy. AG. for the State. Grievancenf the pet tioner is that though he is entitled for promotion to t e pest of Prtncipal from that at Headmaster, (an/account of respondents’ mistake, he has not been promoted. Learned counsei for he petitiener submits that ' inadvertentiy the name of the petitioner cuuid net be forwarded to D.P.C. as a rsuit of which the petitioner has been denied fer his p emotion. He submits that since V2069, the petitiner hae been making representation to respond a t No.2 Le. Director, Public ' instructions, Directorate, ipur but nothing has been done by the said responde t or any other respondents. He further submits that the purpose of filing this petition would be served if direction counse! for the is issued to respondent No. 2 to decid the pending representation of the petitioner within stip iated period. .. ‘ warm. eat: gamm. rmfanfa—Fsn 4o—2/2o= i— m i 50,000“ ‘/ . ..y.:.f%:.s%2..%if€?i{.‘3 mW W200 mW (man) m 331W wmW mafia am W tnwvff ’ fsé?W 1* aim m m W, Wan—6;, WI WW. w-w WI” mzao mm (Waqa) m