S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 7332 of 2009 Vijay B. Purohit vs. State of Raj. ---- 30.9.2009 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Ashwin Garg for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Faujdar, Public Prosecutor. --- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned counsel for the accused petitioner contended that the co-ordinate Bench of this court granted bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. to the co-accused Aniket Purohit. The case of the present accused petitioner is not distinguishable to the case of the co-accused who has been granted bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the order of this court dated June 25, 2009 in S.B.Criminal Bail application No. 3787 of 2009. The accused petitioner is in judicial lock up from March 23, 2009 and the case is triable by Magistrate. The investigation in the case is also complete and the police has already filed challan and nothing remains to be done in the case. The Public Prosecutor opposed this argument. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the accused petitioner Vijay B. Purohit son of Balmukund shall be released on bail provided he shall submit bail bond in the amount of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 12,500/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before the trial court on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/