IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1929 RP.No. 1022 of 2007(Y) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.11758/2007 Dated 20/09/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ----------------------------------------- 1. K.IBRAHIM, MANAGER, AKMH SCHOOL, KOTTOOR, INDIANOOR, KOTTANKAL, MALAPPURAM. 2. BASHEER KURUNIYAN, HEADMASTER, AKMH SCHOOL, KOTTOOR, INDIANOOR, KOTTANKAL, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN C.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCAION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. 3. K.SUDHA, H.S.A.PHYSICAL SCIENCE AKMH SCHOOL, KOTTOOR, INDIANOOR, KOTTANKKAL, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.BABU.S.NAIR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= R.P. No. 1022 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No.11758 of 2007 ======================= Dated this the 12th day of November, 2007 ORDER The above writ petition was disposed of on the basis of a memo filed by the petitioners to the effect that the writ petition is not pressed. The review petition is now filed by the petitioners in the writ petition on the ground that while making the prayer they omitted to request for liberty to file a fresh writ petition in respect of one of the prayers in the writ petition. It is under the above circumstances that review petition has been filed. I have heard both sides. It is apparent that the mistake was that of the counsel. In the above circumstances the Review Petition is allowed and judgment dated 20.9.07 is recalled. Sd/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE JP