IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19591 of 2011 Sadanand Singh Versus The State Of Bihar Through Department of Vigilance Bureau ---------------------------------- 8 22.9.2011 This case has been listed under the heading ‘To be mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner by filing mentioning slip at Flag-A stating therein that in first paragraph of order dated 12.9.2011 in place of ‘counsel for the State’ it should have been ‘counsel for the Vigilance’ and in first line of second paragraph in place of ’19 posts’ it should have been ’90 posts’. The order dated 12.9.2011 is modified to the extent that in first paragraph let it be read as ‘counsel for the Vigilance’ in place of ‘counsel for the State’ and in the first line of second paragraph let it be read as ’90 posts’ in place of ’19 posts’. Let this order including the order dated 12.9.2011 be communicated to the court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)