IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) NO. $é1§j /2009 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner : {// Smt. Chandra Kumari Chandra, Wife of Sri Ram Kumar Chandra, (Daughter of Sri Chait Ram Chandra), Aged about 25 years, R/o Village Thoothi, Now residing at Village Kirit, Block and Tahsil — Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa- (co) Versus Respondents y :1. Janpad Panchayat Malkharauda, Tahsil — Malkharauda, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Acting through its Chief Executive Officer. /2. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mal— kharauda, Distt. Janjgir Chaxnpa (C.G.) IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT / WRITS, DIRECTION / 'DIRECTIONS, ORDER/ ORDERS ETC . The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:- 1. Particulars of the Petitioner As Stated in cause title above. R HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fx27\ WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5251 of2009 PETITIONER Smt. Chandra Kumari Chandra. VERSUS RESPONDENTS Janpad Panchayat: Malkharauda & another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri K.A.Ansari. Senior Advocate with Shri Badmddin Khan Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 day of September, 2009) Kk Shri Ansari, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been selected for the post of Shiksha Karmi, Grade III. Despite selection; some juniors in the merit list have been given appointment order and the petitioner, even being senior in the merit list, has completely been ignored and no l/ appointment order has been issued to her till date. The petitioner has made a representation to the respondent No. 2 i.e. the Chief Executive omcer Janpad Panchayat, Mal Kharauda, on 04m March, 2009 (Annexure P/lO), and thereafter to,the Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Janjgir—Champa, on 17m March, 2009 (Annexure P11 l) and 27m August, 2009 (Annexu’re P/12). However, no decision as yet has been taken on the aforesaid representations. [’1’ \ Shri Ansari submits that at this stage, the petitioner does not want to \ contest this petition on merits. However, the respondents may be Q1) _ \ directed to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Chief Executive Officers, Janpad Panchayat, Malkharoda and Jila Panchayat, Janjgir—Champa, are directed to consider and decide the representations, as aforesatated, in accordance with law, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders as early as possible, preferably Within a period ofthree weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthis order. In View of the above, according to Shri Ansari, nothing survives for l l Ir adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 1‘ 5d]. i / Satish K. Agnihotri Judge