IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 1013 of 2009(F) ------------------------------- (CRIME NO.6/2003 OF THE EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, PAMPADY) ......................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED -------------------------------- 1. K.T.ANTONY, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, KUNNATHETTU HOUSE, CHENGALAM EAST VILLAGE, CHENGALAM EAST KARA, KOTTAYAM TALUK. 2. P.S.SATHEESHKUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, SREENILAYAM HOUSE, KIDANGOOR VILLAGE, PULLAPALLY KARA, MEENACHIL TALUK. 3. M.K.DIVAKARAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. KUNJUKUNJU, MANIYACKAL HOUSE, PAMPADY VILLAGE, POTHENPURAM KARA, KOTTAYAM TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.DEEPTHY.S.NATH SRI.A.K.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, PAMPADY, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. AMJAD ALI. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = CRL.M.C. NO. 1013 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of March, 2009. O R D E R The result of this case would depend upon the validity of a re-introduced Rule. I am informed that the validity of the said Rule is under challenge and it is pending consideration in a writ appeal. In the light of this, with liberty to challenge the validity of the Rule, this Crl.M.C. is closed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-