1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : O R D E R : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3346/2006 (Smt. Vimla & Anr. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 11.08.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.P.R. Mehta, for the petitioners. Mr.C.S. Ojha, Dy. Govt. Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In pursuance of the order dated 29th July, 2008 passed by this Court respondents Nos.3 and 4 are present with the record of this case, so also, filed receipt of cost deposited as per order of this Court. It is stated at bar by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have already been appointed during pendency of writ petition, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioners were appointed during pendency of this writ petition as ordered by this Court on 05th July, 2006. 2 I have perused the order dated 05th July, 2006 in which there is no order of providing appointment to petitioners but having considered the request for interim relief the respondents were directed to recommend and send the petitioners for Anganwari Karyakarta training as and when commenced. Therefore, it cannot be said that petitioner was appointed as per order of this Court. This Court has only passed the order on 05th July, 2008 to send the petitioners for Anganwari Karyakarta training as and when commenced. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that petitioners have already been appointed, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous, therefore, I have no occasion except to dismiss this writ petition on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioners while observing that respondents are disputing the said assertion. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-