1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2005 IN F.C.A. NO. 79 OF 2004 Shri (Dr) Chandra Bhushan Singh ... Applicant Versus Neeradevi Chandra Bhushan Singh ... Respondent Applicant in person. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & : F.I. REBELLO, & : F.I. REBELLO, & A.V. A.V. A.V. MOHTA, JJ. MOHTA, JJ. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 : 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C. . The Applicant/original respondent present in person. . By the present application, he seeks for recalling the order dated 30.8.2004. That order was passed in the absence of the advocate for the applicant and applicant. The order of the Family Court was set aside and the matter was remanded back to the Family Court for reconsideration in terms of the judgement dated 30.8.2004. . By this application, what the petitioner contends is that the decree for divorce be upheld. For the reasons set out in the order, we remanded the matter, where the petitioner will have opportunity of proving his case on merits. We 2 therefore, do not think it appropriate to recall our order. Hence, application rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)