1 (crim appln 3934 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3934 OF 2010 Niraj B. Singla and Ors. ...Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.P.D. Desai i/b. Mr. Viran V. Vashi for Applicants Mr. Manoj S. Mhambrey for Respondent No.2 Mr.P.S. Hingorani -APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 6TH SPETEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. This is an application filed by the Applicants for quashing the criminal complaint lodged by the Respondent No.2 for the offences punishable under section 498-A, 406 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The Respondent O.2 has filed an affidavit, in which, she has stated that she has no objection if this complaint is quashed by this Court. 2 (crim appln 3934 of 2010) 3. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 submitted that the Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. She has reiterated the contents of the affidavit filed by her. Both the parties have also filed the consent terms in the petition filed by them in the Family Court at Bandra. 4. In view of the affidavit filed by the Respondent No.2 and the consent terms filed by both the parties in the Family Court at Bandra in MJ Petition No.F-297 of 2010 and in view of the judgment of the Apex court in the case of B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana reported in AIR 2003 SC 1386, there is no reason why this compliant should not be quashed. 5. Accordingly, petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)