IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15774 of 2010 SUNIL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 06.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is alleged for making demand of ransom, on non-payment threatening for dire consequences rather killing the informant and his family members and ploughing his field. I find substance in the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that remaining parties at litigating term. Both parties are uncle and nephew in relation. Allegations may never be believed for refusal of anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Motipur P. S. Case No.193/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)