^•^^^^ '7 ./ ^' y', ll/ L IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CC.G.) W.P. N0. l^ f^~> 72002 PETITIONER ^ .>^^':"^^^ .^^'•"".ff:.^ ^.'•^^.•^"J< .••'*: ,,\.>J.~.-TL.":'r ^^.so? ^^"A--"' '^: Sham Sher Bahadur Singh, S/o Late Shri RanBahadur Singh, aged about 59 years, Assistant statistical officer (under suspension) Distt. Planning and statistical office, Rest house building, near Bus Stand Kawardha, Distt • Kawardha (C • G,) VERSUS RESPONDENTS v.^ r)!1^.^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary planning and statistical Mantrayala D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C • G.) 2 • Director Planning and statistical Kfahila Polytechnique Building pension Bada Baran Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Distt, Planning and statistics Officer Rest House Building Near Bus Stand Kawardha, District Kawardha (C•G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^r: y\r"J!y ^.e^-. XI-HC-22 3H^T'^T 'f^TT^STI^T %HTC^ ^Ra " ''. V .>.. ^IIWII ^? ^l^Krt^ ^^^<o, fa<ns^y 3nit?r 'q^r^ ...co..:.^..^o.:..J..C^.., ^^..^...........-..-.........-..^.^ ^ '^^s' ^f^ '^TTW^?feT D.B.; Hon. gliriJustice P.C.Naik Hon, Shri Justice Fakhrud 17.07.2003 Pctitioncr Shaiiishcr Baliadl On the prayer of the pctil heaixl as lie ^vill attain. tliel 31.07.2003, aiid with fhe co-aae Aclvocate, the niatter is taken up He^rd. Siiice fhe petitioner had asked liim. whether he wauld Counsel. On his consent, Shri \1 Shri Prashaiit Mishra, AdvocaN wliich tliey giadly agreed to do. Tliat at tlie relevaiit timel Assistaiit, Statistical Officer, Kaw| was 011 leave, because of some fa{3 custody aad remamed m confi4i coniing to know abozit his arre <^I^I<yi<il<l 'RTTOf ^ fe^ <fa^i< '^3iP<F?3R^T ill, JJ. ar Suigh in pcrsou, loner that tlie petition riiay be age of superaiinuation on :nt of the leaiiiecl Goveniinent br fnial disposal. not retauied any couiisel, we IRse to get the assistaiice of a .D.Bajpia, Seniot Advocate aad were requested to assist him fhe petitioner was posted as ^rdha, It appears that when he 'ajmily dispute, he was taken into ement for over 48 hours. On t aiid czistody, thc Compctent Authority placcd tlic pctitioncr uudcr suspcnsiou, That oxxlcr 2^ [Tft^tfe^ XI-HC-22 ^? ^i^Kri^, ^l^^Ko, i<s|<vti^y A Y. '^ 3H^T IR^ WWflT^W^ 200 '^^T" ^TT^T^T f^iw 3?n^r s^^^rft^ 3^1^F '^IT^R <yf^a was the subject m.atter o^ M. P.Adio.iiiistrative Tribunal, O.A.No.319/2001. The petitloner| challenged the. vires of sub-rule 2 sub-inle 2 of M,P.Civil Seivicesl Appeal) Rules, 1966. The O.A. ?vvhicli order is the subject raatter of] When the niatter had comj 14.2.2003, the Court had dtrected t| ^he' petitioner for tlie period d.uilag fcluU'. It was further directed tliat Isuspcnsion ajiid salaiy would be cc| lundairiental niles and outeoine o| ^ase aiid depai-tiiiental eiiquiry/ifaijiy. On a query beiiig raised, it i©] |iie salar-y to which he was eiititledl pnly aiiiouiit Quteteridirsig, a.ccordi^ig to the petitiotier, is> tlie ^alaiy for the leave period of 26 day |iis pension papers have been Biovefl aad are beuig processed. 1 ttil^i<yt<-ill 'RW^f ^ fs^l <^1^1< ^3rf;<TR3TT^[ challenge before tlie Raipur Bench ia had ui flie said O.A. also of Rule 9 arid clause (a) of (Classification, Control & v'as dismissed 011 5,7.2002 challenge in this petition. 2 up befbre the Court on [lat salar};r sliould be paid to which he had performed his adjustaicut of tlic pcriod of nsidcixd in. accbixlcm.cc with the wiit petitipn^ criinuial steted by tlie petitioner tliat has been p^ud to hioi. The s. It is also faiiiy stated that 7 - [^ft^'^fe^ XI-HC-22 ^??^r'5R f<^|ch 3^T^I $t>*ii<^ ^f^a' >...- ^ao/- •I "S^ ^N(d<4, ^^<l<o, ^TOy 3?ii^r x^^t^3^ WW1T ^NS^b 'l^sr' ^ 200 ^T^T ^dT^R <M^a - ^- Hayiiig coiisidered tlie i|iatter aiid iii tlie facts ^iid circuHistailces of fhe case and ib Itl th.at salaiy has been paid ai^d «"• processed, tlie Court is of the 4 would be sen/ed iii keepuig this cause delay in. tlie settlenient of tt In tlie above view of the m^ with a dtrection that fhe concenifcd papers relatmg to the post retir^l accordance wifh law aiid that beAefits due and adinissible under di^ law, bc grantcd to tlic pet^ pctitioner ha^ any othcr gricvaa^ by -way of a fresh petLtioii. Before pai-titig witli tlie ca^ reiidered by Shri V,D.BaJpai, S^ Mislii-a, Advocate. C,C, .as per rules. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge ob8^id4l'l HW<^f^ f^^ <fa^j< ^sif^w^T^T view of fhe adiaitted position pension papers ai'e being rpiiiion that :ao useful purpose writ petition pexidiiig as it may bie post retirEd dues. atter, the petitiou is disposed of autliorities shall process the dues at a<ii early date aiid m |tioucr proinptty. In case tlic |^e, he niay appix?ach tlie Court ie, v^e appreciate the assistaiice ', Aclvocate aiid Shri Prashaiit Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [-^•^3^ -^ ^/-^ ^J ^ ^