IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26669 of 2008 Between: G.Rajesh ..... Petitioner AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, West Maredpally, Secunderabad and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Nivarthi Mruthyinjaya.S. for Mr.Amancharla V.Gopal Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr.R.Radhakrishna Reddy, SC for GHMC Counsel for respondent No.3: AGP for Municipal Administration The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in issuing Notice No.83/VET/NZ/GHMC/2008, dated 02-12- 2008, as illegal and arbitrary.” At the hearing, Sri Nivarthi Mruthyinjaya.S., learned Counsel representing Sri Amancharla V.Gopal Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause of the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 31-12-2008, is vacated and WVMP.No.616 of 2009 and WPMP.No.34925 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 23rd June, 2011 lur