IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2826 of 2007 BIMLESH KUMAR JHA & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 8.9.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the opposite parties. The petitioners have filed this contempt application for non- compliance of this Court’s order dated 31.7.2007 passed in C.W.J.C.No.12627 of 2006 and its analogous cases. This Court had directed the District Magistrate to consider the representation filed by the petitioners with respect to their complaint that they should be appointed/reappointed to the post of ‘Shiksha Mitra’. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they had filed a representation giving details regarding the manner of appointment and one of the issues that was raised by them was that the approval had not been taken from the competent authority prior to the appointment on the post of ‘Shiksha Mitra’. A show cause has been filed by the District Magistrate, Madhubani, annexing the order passed in compliance of this Court’s order which is contained in annexure-A to the affidavit filed on 3.9.2008. The District Magistrate, Madhubani has given certain reasons for rejecting the representation of the petitioners which according to the counsel for the petitioners is not satisfactory. However, the present application is for non-compliance of the orders - 2 - of this Court. The District Magistrate has passed an order giving reasons for rejecting the representation of the petitioner. If the reasons do not satisfy the petitioner the remedy does not lie in pursuing the contempt application. The order of the court has been complied, and as such, the contempt application is dismissed. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)