IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18341 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- SINGERIAWAN, P.S.- SHAHJAHANPUR, DISTRICT- PATNA ……………… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMESH KUMAR S/O RASPIRYA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- KANHANPUR, P.S.- FATUHAN, DISTRICT- PATNA 3. NARAIN KUMAR S/O LATE SAKUN MAHTO 4. MANOJ KUMAR S/O NARAIN KUMAR 5. BOTH R/O VILLAGE- SALALPUR, P.S.- DANIAWAN, DISTRICT- PATNA, AT PRESENT R/O MOHALLA- RAJBANSHI NAGAR “NARAIN NIWAS” EXTENSION, ROAD NO. 1, POST OFFICE & P.S.- SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT- PATNA. ----------- 2. 28.01.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 5.3.2010 passed in Criminal Revision No. 880/2009, by which the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Patna City has set aside the order of cognizance dated 2.4.2009 passed in complaint case no. 893/2008. On going through the facts of the case as well as the order impugned, I find that Revisional Court had applied its mind to the facts of the case and, therefore, set aside the order of cognizance. I find no illegality in the finding of the Revisional Court, I decline to interfere in the order. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )