giGH GGURT Cs? m‘IHKE‘TISGARH: BILASFUR Writ Petition {3% Na. 1520 of 2038 “Petitionar Sagan Singh‘ Sfo. 55m RK. Singh, aged abcut 34 years, accupation Service; posted as Patwari, Haika No.48 Pondum, Tahsé! - Dan‘vewada, DEW South Bastar Dantewada (CGX Versw Respondents é} The Deoartment State of 0f Chhamsqam Rex/en”? “KS €hmugh Bhaxgag inc bemeiarv éaipdr WW, H. In,“ {V‘s}. 2) The CoRecmr, Dantewaziaj Distt. Dantewada {$6} '3} Sub Divisionai Officer, ('R‘evema}, Eianiewada, Diw. Dantewada (CG). 4) Tahsikian Bantewaday Distt. Dantewada {CG}. (Wm Petitian under Amcka 226 0‘ the Constitutien cf indéa) SB: Hon’bie wk“. $aiish K. Agmhetré, J. Dr. Saniéet Sharma coungeE farthe netitioner Em! Amk Bakshi‘ Gavt. Advomm fer the State. Pfasent: ~y‘.u GRAL OR§§R (Passed on 1é-3-2ws} Wiih consent 9f learned caunsai appear§ ‘g far bath the pariies. tm matkef :s heard mam; 2) Learned counse§ apnearing f0: the petiticner submits that me petitioner wa$ posted as Patwaré in Patwari Ha£ka N048 Gud$a Tahsé§ and Distt. Dantewada. The petit’mner has been transferred to PaWari Haika N04, Bhafatpua mm. Koréa, vide order daiec‘; 7-7-2637 (Annexure i1 ). 3) Learned caunee! appearing fer the petitéoner as we§§ as fer me Siateirespondems jeinfiy submit that the facts and uuestien cf law énvoived in the peiition are rhe same to that of Writ Petiticn (S) 5826 cf 2§07 g Framod Kemar Bharti Vs. Sate of Chhateisgarh & cihers; which was drepcsee cf by erder dated 14-‘r—2GG8. Learnee counser furEher submiis that i’nie petrtien may be diseased or“ in the same terms. a) in véew of the abave-stated submis3éan made by Xwmsd cwnse: agzpearmg for the pam’es, the writ peii'técm is disposed 0f in the same terms, Le, the respondents are direcred to make suitabie arrangement Withm a perieci 0f f5” weeks far reHeving and aHQWmg fhe petitlaner to jein his new pzece a? posting: un sub§ect to verifwa‘tion cf the facts NO ower aeto costs /e/w" Leer“ Sd/- . , Satish K. Agnihetrg, Judge