IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.455 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 21.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondents to remove the illegal encroachment made on the land of the petitioner by the private respondents no.7 to 16 and further direction to the police to give protection for erecting boundary wall on his land. Learned counsel submits that Anchal Amin in his report to Circle Officer also stated that the respondents have made encroachment upon the land of the petitioner.He further submits that a miscellaneous case under section 107 of Cr.P.C. is still going on in between the parties. So far as the first prayer made by the writ petitioner is concerned the same is not maintainable. So far as the second prayer in respect of the police protection to him for erecting his boundary wall is concerned the said releief also cannot be extended to the petitioner because the right to title has not been conclusively decided by a competent court. It will be open for the petitioner to avail other remedy available in the law. With the aforesaid observation this application is disposed of. AnilK.sinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)