IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 13772 of 2006 Between: T. Jashva S/o. George R/o. H.No. 2/235/2-1, Snehanagar, Filter Bed Road, Waddepalli, Hanumakonda, Warangal. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The National Institute of Technology, Khajipet, Warangal, Rep. by its Director. 2 The Employment Officer, Employment Exchange, Mulugu Road, Hanumakonda, Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the Respondents to receive the application that is being made by the petitioner directly without insisting for sponsoring his name from the 2nd Respondent Employment Exchange and consider his candidature for the post of Mechanic 'C' Grade along with other candidates by permitting him to appear for the test/ interview that will be held for the said post and pass such other order or orders as may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.P.ACHARYA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following ORDER: The ﬁrst respondent issued a notiﬁcation proposing to ﬁll backlog vacancies for the Scheduled Caste and Schedule Tribe candidates. The consideration was limited to the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Alleging that his case was not sponsored by the Employment Exchange, the petitioner ﬁled this writ petition for necessary directions. While issuing notice before admission, this Court granted an interim order, dated 07.07.2006, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner without insisting on sponsoring by the Employment Exchange. Now, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the case of the petitioner was considered, he was not selected. In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:04.08.2008 kdl