IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1928 WP(C).No. 29995 of 2006(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ RADHA RAMAKRISHNAN, `SOWPARNIKA' THRIKOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ALAGAPPA NAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE ALAGAPPA NAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ALAGAPPA NAGAR, AMBALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. ALAGAPPA NAGAR PANCHAYAT COUNCIL, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF THE ALAGAPPA NAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ALAGAPPA NAGAR, AMBALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SECRETARY, ALAGAPPA NAGAR PANCHAYAT COUNCIL REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF THE ALAGAPPA NAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ALAGAPPA NAGAR, AMBALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MATHEW G.VADAKKEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,J. ``````````````````````````` W.P.(C) NO. 29995 OF 2006 ``````````````````````````` Dated this the 16th day of November, 2006 J U D G M E N T The petitioner being aggrieved by Exhibit P8 resolution adopted by the Panchayat deciding to reject the license application submitted by him for the establishment of a fruit processing and juice manufacturing unit has preferred Exhibit P9 appeal before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. Exhibit P8 is impugned on the various grounds raised in the writ petition. 2. I do not propose to examine the merits of the grounds since Exhibit P9 appeal is already pending before the Tribunal. Writ petition will stand disposed of directing the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Trivandrum to take up Exhibit P9, issue notice to all concerned parties, hear them and dispose of the same in accordance with law at the Tribunal's earliest and at any rate within ten days of receiving copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent, Panchayat to number the building constructed by the petitioner provisionally and subject to the final outcome of Exhibit P9. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE Rp WPC : 2 :