IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15121 of 2011 MD. SONU @ SONU MIYAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 24.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation name of this petitioner surfaced and allegedly, on the basis of disclosure made by the petitioner stolen motorcycle was recovered from the house of one Sunil Singh. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the seizure list does not contain either signature of Sunil Singh or his family member and, as a matter of fact, the petitioner never disclosed about stolen motorcycle. It is also pointed out by the petitioner that the petitioner is in jail custody since 25.12.2007 in connection with other case and has been remanded in the present case on 26.12.2010. Although it appears that the petitioner carries some criminal antecedent but taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Md. Sonu @ Sonu Miyan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Barauni Refinary P.S. Case no. 349/2007 subject to the conditions that one of the sureties must be local and holder of landed property, furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the learned trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months and if he fails to do so on 2 two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, and furthermore, the learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within the above stated period. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)