vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2201 OF 2002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2201 OF 2002 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2201 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3684 OF 1995 Rajbali Shankar Yadav & Ors. ... Applicants V/s. Rambahor Samai Yadav & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.I. Jaykar for Applicant None for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 20, 2008 FEBRUARY 20, 2008 FEBRUARY 20, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The bailiff’s report indicates that all the respondents have been served. Respondent No.1A has been served through his son. Respondent 1C has refused to accept the notice. Respondent Nos.1B, 1D, 1E and 1F are served by affixing as they were not found present at the time of service. 2. The civil application has been filed for restoring the petition which was dismissed against the unserved respondents by an order of 7.2.2002. The applicants are the heirs of the petitioners. Nobody appears for the respondent Nos.1A to 1F, though served. 3. For the reasons stated in the civil application, it is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and : 2 : (c) on payment of costs of Rs.1000/- to the Maharashtra : 3 : State Legal Services Authority within two weeks. Amendments to be carried out thereafter within two weeks.