IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1137 of 2010 1. MAHENDRA YADAV S/O KUSUL LAL YADAV @ SUKUM LAL YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, VIA- NIRMALI, DISTT.- SAHARSA, NOW SUPAUL -------- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. GOSAI YADAV S/O LATE MEWALAL YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, DISTT.- SAHARSA NOW SUPAUL 3. HANSAHA DEVI W/O LATE GOSAI YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, DISTT.- SAHARSA NOW SUPAUL 4. MAHAKANT YADAV S/O LATE GOSAI YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, DISTT.- SAHARSA NOW SUPAUL 5. JAIKANT YADAV S/O LATE GOSAI YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, DISTT.- SAHARSA NOW SUPAUL 6. SRIKANT YADAV S/O LATE GOSAI YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, DISTT.- SAHARSA NOW SUPAUL 7. PULKIT YADAV S/O CHHABAN YADAV R/O VILL.- PERKAUCH, P.S. MARAUNA, P.O. PERKAUCH, DISTT.- SAHARSA NOW SUPAUL ----- Respondents. ----------- 2. 7.7.2010 Heard Mr. Durgesh Nandan for the petitioner, and Mr. Kaushal Kumar, Assistant Counsel to Mr. Dr. R.K. Singh for the opposite party. This application has been filed for recall and/or modification of the order dated 24.2.2004, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11952 of 1993 for the non-compliance of which the writ petition stood dismissed. It appears that the order dated 24.2.2004 was passed in presence of learned counsel for the petitioner, yet the peremptory order was not complied with. 2 Secondly, the present restoration application was filed after a lapse of more than six years having been filed on 18.3.2010. It appears that it is a case of negligence and laches. This application is accordingly rejected. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. )