THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.7909 OF 2010 Dated 9th April, 2010 Between: Mohd Ahmed …Petitioner And Chief Executive Officer and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Smt A.Anasuya Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in disposing of the petitioner’s representation dated 07.05.2009 as illegal and arbitrary. In the view, this Court is proposing to take; it is not necessary to give notice to respondent No.3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing respondent No.1. According to the petitioner there is a dispute between him and respondent No.3 over property bearing house Nos.1-19-1 to 13 of Rasoolpura Village, Secunderabad Cantonment. The petitioner alleged that despite the civil disputes pending between them, respondent No.3 applied for assessment of the abovementioned properties and respondent No.1 has accordingly assessed the properties. Feeling aggrieved by the said assessment, the petitioner is stated to have made his representation on 07.05.2009 to respondent No.1 to cancel the assessment. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said representation is not disposed of. In view of the innocuous nature of the grievance of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, with the direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.10164 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 9th April, 2010 vrn