IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3556 of 2011 SHASHANK SHEKHAR PRASAD & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2. 11.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 420/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioners that there was agreement between the petitioners and the complainant that 40% of the construction area as share and Rs. 3,000/- per month was to be given to the complainant but neither the work was completed nor the share of the complainant was given as per the agreement. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the share of the complainant was given as per the agreement. Moreover, the dispute can not be resolved at the criminal forum. Considering the contractual 2 nature of accusation, let the petitioners, Shashank Shekhar Prasad, Jagdish Prasad and Sunyukta Devi be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case no. 1567 (C) of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist Class, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)