IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32158 of 2010 ANIL MAHTO . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 11.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the informant. Petitioner is seeking Anticipatory Bail in a case under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner had instituted a case against the family members of the victim lady which has resulted in the present case. Considering the allegations of demand of dowry and torture against the husband, I am not inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. Amit (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)