AB 1470/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mrs. N.S.Thakuria, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Munir, lea rned additional public prosecutor, Assam. Also perused the case diary. On perusal of the case diary it appears that accused petitioner was serving as a Manager in the firm of the informant. While he was serving in the informant’s f irm, he got a better assignment in another firm but the informant’s firm did not release him and as a result, the petitioner could not join his new assignment. It also reveals that the accused petitioner demanded payment of Rs.3 lacs from t he informant firm in the form of Provident Fund, Gratuity, Last Pay etc. but the same was refused and to avoid the liability, the informant has filed the FIR a gainst the accused petitioner. In support of his contentions, learned counsel fo r the petitioner has furnished a copy of the legal notice dated 24.4.2011 (Annex ure-A) sent to the Informant’s Firm. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner . On the basis of the materials found in the case diary, I am of the considered view that the petitioner has been able to make out a case for granting pre-arre st bail. Accordingly, interim bail granted on 1.6.2011 by this court is hereby m ade absolute on the same terms and conditions. With the aforesaid directions, bail application stands disposed of.