1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 6430/2006 Devendra Balwant Chhapparghare..vs..Senior Superintendent of Post Office & anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Narnaware, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Tanna, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA & C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. DATED : 6 th August, 2008 The petitioner has challenged communication dated 02.11.2006, whereby the respondents directed the petitioner to submit documents on or before 08.11.2006 with further observation that failure to submission of the required documents and information, they would be compelled to review his retention in the department. We see there is no reason to interfere in the present order/communication. Even otherwise, the petitioner is bound to submit the documents, if required by the respondents, to justify the retention for which the explanation and documents are sought. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions makes statement that the petitioner has already submitted the documents. Even if, he has not submitted the documents, he undertakes to submit the documents within two weeks. In view of above, nothing survives in the present petition. The petition stands disposed of. The interim order granted earlier stands vacated. JUDGE JUDGE kahale