IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9111 of 2007 Dayanand Pathak, Son of Late Gangadhar Pathak, resident of Village- Debthu, P.S. Hulasganj, District-Jehanabad ------------ Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Human Resources, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Primary Education, New Secretariat, Bihar,Patna 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya ( Bihar) 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya 6. The Treasury Officer, Gaya --------------------- Respondents. ----------- 03 29-06-2011 Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arshad Alam, learned Standing Counsel no.3 appearing on behalf of Respondent/ State. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for directing the Respondents to make payment of difference of salary deposited in the G.P.F. Account from 1.1.1971 to 31.3.1973. In this case, two counter affidavits have been filed; one by the District Provident Fund Officer, Gaya and another by the District Superintendent of Education, Gaya. In paragraph no.9 of the counter affidavit filed by the District Superintendent of Education, which was filed on 21.2.2008 after serving a copy of the same on learned counsel for the petitioner, it has been made clear that the District Superintendent of Education vide order dated 20.9.2007 had issued necessary order to make payment of differential amount of salary with interest for the aforesaid period. The statement made in the counter affidavit has not been controverted by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the statement made in the counter affidavit, the Court is of the opinion that the grievance of the petitioner has already been 2 redressed and, as such, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )