IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 39271 of 2003(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.J.ABDUL JALEEL, KOLLANTAYYATH, ERUVA, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, N.H.DIVISION, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, HARIPAD. 4. BABU PEROOR VADAKKEPURAM, PUTHEN ROAD JUNCTION, KAYAMKULAM. R1 TO R3 BY G.P. SRI. P. RAVIKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 12.9.2003 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 17.10.2003 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 39271 OF 2003 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The prayer in the WPC is for direction to respondents 1 to 3 to remove fourth respondent from the encroached land which is on the side of National Highway. W.P.C. is accordingly disposed of directing the first respondent to conduct enquiry, take report from the second respondent and take appropriate action. I make it clear that no adverse action should be taken against the fourth respondent before he is informed about it and given opportunity to raise objections. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2