1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 620 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO. 1040 OF 1984 Ratanchand Hirachand Baldota ... Plaintiff. Vs John Domnic Gomes (Deceased) .... Defendant. And Thomas John Gomes & Ors. ... Respondents. And Mrs. Deena Pramod Baldota .. Applicant. Mr. Nikumbha i/b M.G. Bhat for respondent nos. 3a to 9. Mr. D.S. Sakhalkar for applicant. CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. 1. The present chamber summons has been 2 taken out for bringing the legal heirs of the defendant no. 1 on record. There is a delay in taking out the present chamber summons. The objection raised by respondent nos. 3a to 9 is that there is gross delay of a period of six years and in view thereof, the chamber summons should not be granted. In my view, in the interest of justice the present chamber summons is required to be granted. The abatement is set aside. Delay condoned. The chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (a-1), (b) and (d). The applicant is directed to pay costs of the chamber summons to the respondent nos. 3a to 9 quantified at Rs. 3,500/-