1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2004 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2004 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6727 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO. 6727 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO. 6727 OF 2000 AND AND AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6921 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO. 6921 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO. 6921 OF 2000 Gorakhnath Khashaba Shedge. .. Appellant. vs. The Joint Registrar, (Appeals), Pune Division, Pune & Ors. .. Respondents. Dr. V.K. Choudhari for Appellant. Mr. Vijay Patil for respondent no.1. Mr. Vinod Jadhav for respondent no. 4. Mr. R.M. Patne for respondent nos. 2 & 3. .. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATE: 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATE: 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. . Heard. 2. This Letters Patent Appeal is filed impugning 2 the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court wherein it has quashed and set aside the order passed by Joint Registrar as it is found that the alienation in favour of respondent no. 1 was in violation of clause (d) of Section 48 and that it was not justified in saying that he is a person who is interested in land and, therefore, the learned Single Judge allowed the petitions by quashing and setting aside the order dated 4.8.2000 passed by the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies. 3. We do not find any error or illegality in the impugned order. Therefore, the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the civil application does not survive. The same is dismissed as infructuous. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )