1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR L.P.A. ST. NO.10674 OF 2009. IN W.P. NO.2216/08 (D) SAYYAD ARIF S/O SAYYAD IKBAL VS THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.W.D. AMRAVATI AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri P. S. Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Shri D. P. Thakre, AGP for respondents. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 22nd FEBRUARY, 2010. 1. The order of learned Single Judge passed on 16-3-2009 dismissing the writ petition is under challenge. 2. The appellant claims that he was initially appointed as Oilman. The appellant was actually serving as Driver/operator of various machines. 3. Even accepting for a moment that for some time the petitioner was actually doing the job of operating driving certain machines or vehicles, 2 this fact by itself does not entitle the petitioner for appointment on that post. A view taken by the learned Single Judge in this regard is not shown to be contrary to any of the service regulations. Moreover, the posts of higher category are not conferred barely by discharging the work thereon for some time. 4. In the result, this Court finds no grounds for interference in the impugned order. 5. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Judge Judge //mule//