SBCWP4522/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4522/2010 Nirmala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 30.04.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Vijay Poonia, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- In pursuance of the advertisement dated 23.02.2010 petitioner, having possessed requisite qualification of secondary education and woman health worker training course, applied for the post of Woman Health Worker. It is submitted that petitioner was admitted to the training of woman health worker on the basis of her working as Aanganwadi Worker and she successfully completed the same. In pursuance of order dated 20.06.2002 of the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Jalore, whereby a direction was given to those candidates who were selected for training of woman health worker to submit a bond to the effect that the selected candidates will serve under the Government of Rajasthan for a period of five years after successful completion of training, the petitioner submitted the bond. The petitioner left her job of Aanganwadi Worker on the assurance given to her that the respondents will provide SBCWP4522/2010 // 2 // employment to her after successful completion of training. Petitioner was surprised to see that there was no reservation provided on the post of woman health worker to such candidates like petitioner as promised by respondents at the time of joining the training course. Petitioner submits a weightage should be given to her in appointment on the post of woman health worker by creating a specific quota for such Aanganwari Workers like petitioner. The appointment on that post is made on the basis of marks secured in secondary school certificate and the training course. It is not shown that petitioner has been by reason of her working as Aanganwari Worker has been put to any disadvantageous position. The petitioner wants that she should be given preference over other candidates who are freshers and applied for such appointment, because she may not be able to compete with them on the basis of marks secured in secondary school certificate or even in training. The prayer that the respondents be directed to make a suitable amendment in the Rule 7 or 7B of the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Services Rules, 1965, apropos reservations of posts/vacancies of Aanganwari Worker, cannot be granted as this Court cannot command the respondents to frame the Rules in a particular manner so as to give preference to the petitioner over other candidates who are freshers and applied SBCWP4522/2010 // 3 // for such appointment. I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//