1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2006 Sindhudurg Education Society ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. C.K. Thomas for Petitioner. Mr. R.J. Mane, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. Mr. P.M. Palshikar for R. No. 2. Mr. U.P. Warunjikar with Mr. Rakesh Johri for R. No.3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 P.C. . The Respondent No. 3 has filed an affidavit. In Para 3 of the affidavit in reply, it is pointed out that NCTE Regulations 2002 has been repealed and have been replaced with NCTE Regulations, 2005. In terms of these regulations, all pending applications including that of the Petitioner will be considered by the NCTE. Considering that no further directions are required. Petition disposed of accordingly. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)