IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLN.(CONTEMPT PETITION) No 1213 of 1989 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLN.(CONTEMPT PETITION) No1214 of 1989 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 3822 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Versus AMBICA MILLS LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MS. KEERAWALA for MR BP TANNA for Petitioner MR SAURIN MEHTA for D.S. Nanavati for Respondent No. 1& 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA Date of decision: 01/02/99 ORAL JUDGEMENT : [Per: Dave, J.] 1. Upon hearing learned counsel Ms. Kerrawala who appears for the petitioner Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation in both of these Contempt Proceedings and learned counsel Mr. Saurin Mehta who appears for the respondents in both the matters, it appears that now looking to the facts indicated hereinafter these proceedings require to be disposed of. 2. The grievance made by the petitioner AMC in both of these Contempt proceedings is that the respondents are guilty of the non-compliance of the orders passed by this Court in two petitions. 3. It is not now in dispute that the respondent No.1 in both the petitions, namely, Shri Ambica Mills Ltd. No.1 and Shri Ambica Mills Ltd. No.2 have been ordered to be wound up. Learned counsel Ms. Kerrawala for the petitioner AMC says that according to her instructions, the requisite claims have been lodged before the Official Liquidator. 4. In view of this now these proceedings do not survive and they require to be disposed of. We order accordingly. Rule in each of the two matters shall stand discharged. No costs. ------- p.n.nair