IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2010 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 29908 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. HYDRU, S/O.MOHAMMED ALIAS BAPPUTTY HAJI, ANAPPATTATH HOUSE, VELLAYOOR P.O., NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. NECHIKKADAN UMMUKULSU, W/O.HYDRU, ANAPPATTATH HOUSE, VELLAYOOR P.O., NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, NILAMBUR TALUK OFFICE, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VELLAYOOR, VILLAGE OFFICE, VELLAYOOR, NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 29908 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st day of May, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioners challenge Exts. P3 and P4 orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act. I am not inclined to entertain the challenge against Exts. P3 and P4 in this writ petition since the petitioners have an alternate remedy by way of revision before the Government under Section 28 of the Act. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. However, further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P3 and P4 shall be kept in abeyance for one month to enable the petitioners to file a revision and seek interim orders. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.