IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.33 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4051 OF 2002 IN APPEAL NO.108 OF 1998 IN R.A.E. SUIT NO.4228 OF 1976 ALONG WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.32 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4050 OF 2002 IN APPEAL NO.107 OF 1998 IN R.A.E. SUIT NO.4227 OF 1976 ALONG WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.34 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4052 OF 2002 IN APPEAL NO.105 OF 1998 IN R.A.E. SUIT NO.4229 OF 1976 Manjit Singh s/o Karnail Singh Bhatti & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Sunder Siddu Shetty & Ors. ...Respondents ...... None present. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : 2 : FEBRUARY 1, 2006. FEBRUARY 1, 2006. FEBRUARY 1, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None appears. No order can be passed on the praecipe for the nature of relief sought. If proper application is filed, prayer will be considered. That application would be entertained, on condition that the Advocate on record for the Petitioners shall pay cost to the High Court Legal Services Committee quantified at Rs.750/- (Rupees Seven Hundred Fifty), as condition precedent. This direction is passed, as none appears for the Petitioners when the matter is called out. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.