1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 196/2009 in Criminal Revision application No. 3 /2009 ( Pradip M. Shelke .vs. Suryakant A. Tupkar and one ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders ======================================= CORAM : A.B. Chaudhari, J. DATED : February 17, 2009 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing criminal revision application. Heard Mr. S.D. Khate, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.1 and Mr. P.D. Kothari, APP for respondent no.2. The revision has been filed against the judgment and order of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The delay is of 12 days in filing revision. The application is opposed by the counsel for contesting respondent no.1 on the ground that the certified copy was itself applied for after three months. Be that as it may. Since the conviction is under challenge, I think it appropriate to condone the delay. Delay condoned. Civil application is disposed of. JUDGE 2 halwai