IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.620 of 2006. Date of Decision : 3.5.2011. Satbir ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Yadav, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. R.K. Agnohotri, Advocate, for the complainant. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This revision is directed against the judgment dated March 13th, 2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge,Rewari affirming the judgment of conviction dated July 24th, 2001 and order of sentence dated July 27th, 2001 of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewari whereby petitioner was convicted under Sections 323 and 325 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six moths and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- with default stipulation respectively. 2. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that he does not challenge the conviction and prays for reduction of the sentence on the ground that, (i) during the pendency of revision, the parties have compromised the matter. He has placed on record compromise-deed (Annexure P-1) and the affidaivt of the complainant also in this regard; (ii) the petitioner has already faced the agony of protracted criminal proceedings spreading over a period of 13 years; (iii) he is not previous convict nor has he indulged in any criminal activity before or after registration of this case and; (iii) he is the only bread winner of his family. Criminal Revision No.620 of 2006 (2) 4. The aforesaid circumstances are of mitigating nature and justify the request made. Hence, this Court upholds the conviction of the petitioner but reduces the sentence to the period already undergone by him. 5. The revision is accepted partly as indicated above. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 3.5.2011. SN