IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11940 of 2006 SMT.SUNITA KUMARI Versus THE B.S.PHARMACEUTICALS & CHEM ----------- 3 29.08.2008 In the peculiarity of the facts and the ground reality that effort had been made by the respondents Corporation to get it wound up by moving the Company Judge has failed for a technical reason but it does not mean that company is in a position to take a decision to regularize the services of the present petitioner or to pay salary accordingly in terms of the such regularization or substantive appointment. Any writ or a direction upon a dead Corporation would be a futile exercise and in that view of the matter, the Court is not willing to adjudicate on the issue one way or the other. But if the petitioner has any hope that this cooperation may have a turn around and she can see better days, the Court is not shutting it out from lodging her claim over the respondents by approaching the Managing Director of the Corporation or whatever relief she may be entitled to within the parameters of law. The writ application stands disposed. pkj (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J)