IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20815 of 2011 Neelam Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2. 19.12.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.9.2011 of the District Magistrate Rohtas at Sasaram setting aside the appointment of the petitioner as Anganwari Sevika. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that one Vipanchika Devi has questioned the appointment of the petitioner in CWJC No. 10454 of 2005. The respondents supported the appointment of the petitioner leading to dismissal of the writ application. There was no justification for fresh termination on an order passed in any other writ application preferred by another before this Court once the respondents had supported the appointment of the petitioner. One Tetri Devi had filed CWJC No. 485 of 2010 aggrieved by denial of appointment. On hearing her grievances the authorities terminated the appointment of the petitioner on 19.12.2009. The petitioner questioned the same in CWJC No. 2028 of 2010 when she was relegated to the appellate remedy before the District Magistrate. The District Magistrate ultimately holds that the petitioner was selected by the Aam Sabha on 23.3.2005.The duration of the same was for three years in accordance with the instructions from the Social Welfare Department dated 14.6.2010 whereafter fresh selection procedure was mandated. Considering that the Anganwari Sevikas are agents or the State Government for dissemination of a welfare scheme and the government policy restricting their tenure for three years at a time the Court finds no reason to interfere with the conclusion of the District Magistrate. The writ application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)