SIOCJJ& ?|a ^ ^ IN TI-IE HIGH COURT OF JUbICATURE CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR / 2006 MP.(S1 N0,_ fl Petitioner ^ ^ "•* l^-y ^M^ ^;:^-""" ^:sy ^•y^" ^" Reseondents Versus :1. 2. -*^ ovy Q^A€ ^^^3. >c>-' 4. Hetram Rathore./ S/o Bhagwat Prasad Rathore, Aged about 36 years. Asst. Teacher, 6ovt. Higher Secondary School, Jamni^li N.T.P.C. Korba, bist: Korba-(C.(S^ State of Chhattisqarh / Through - The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, t)ist: Raipur-fC.G.) District Education Officer,, bist: Korba-(C.©.) Asst. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, t>ist: Korba-(C.(5.) Block Education Off\cer,K^'<^^ N.T.P.C. Kor-ba, Dist: Korba-(C.G.) APARNA MAt-yiYA WRIT PETETEON UN&ER ARTECLE 226 / 227 OF THE CQNSTITUTIQN OFJN&JA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTEON ETCTO^O JUSTECE IN THE MATTER. 1. Particulars of the Petitioner : As per cause title B? c:.- \./ ^ (7- HISH^OURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR W. P. fst No. 5132 of 2006 Petitioner Hetram Rathoi Versi --<9^L f\,tF^ fS.^i^^i^l KSSpOfiQSMT State of Chhattisgarh & others Bsnch; Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Aanlhotri. Shn Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Ar'vind Dubey. Pane! la«'«yerfor the respondents/State. o h c l-/ 5- //5^Tn c.«»^4'-°sM.°^A*-> "''^r^n.&^ ^&.^ »5^pT^rriD£;r/£.uuo> ;ounset appearing for the petitioner submits thal while working as Assistsnt Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qualifications on his own expenses and acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on 27.3.1996 from terkutullah Universit*/, Bhopal (Annexure P/3). 2. Accordinq to learned counsel for the oetitions petitioner is entitfed to two advance increments ents in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwa.i Vs. *Aunicipal Corporatlon, Durg and another (2006 Ctl) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. ,*Aunicipu! Corporatlon, t)u"g ano+her (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachsrs, who had obtalned B. Ed. Examination Certificats on hls own expensss, are covered by_ ^SSS^sSS |Sg|gg!;||^|gsK|ffiig|aiiigBfigg|i|B^ ••Ss.MS^'SXtS'sE^WWS^S^S^fSSfSS^^^^s^.sgaS ^ ttie circufar dated 24.12.98 (Annexur'e P/l) issued by the State Sovernrnent of iVradhya Pradesh 3. Learned counse! for the petitioner furtiier submits that the facts cnd questie.n of law involved in the present case are squarely covered by declsion c-f this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. A^unicipa! Corporation. Durg and another (Supra), to which Eearned counsel appearing for th< respondents fairly concedes agrees with the averment iTiude by tearned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the w-rit petltion is a'lowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. A4unicipat Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of -Hie fact as to whetiier the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses o" not. No order n^ trt /*n??t? i ^ ^rfy^ ! Sdl- SatishK.Ag Judge Bablu