«^"'*";T!E^!^. '^l'. -HC—78 an^T^ifriw 'Bql 3TR5I ^WR '3^ •<)l<ii<f4, iJtfllfl'IS, Iqdl'yy 1«NCIi shHieb a^TRRi-^Tpf^g^) •RtnwHft»3jT^r ^Plfef^T'WRlf ^f fe^t'^SR^K ^TSiRnan^r !W.P. (S) No.7067/2008 PETITIONER Sia<. Bharti, wife of Shri Chaadrakant Dew^angan, aged'about 42 years, R/o. C/o. Ch^ndmal Sonwani, Near Krishi Upaj Mandi, ADijapumapara, Kanker C(G) V^-sus RESPONDENTS 1 2. 3. Stalje of Clihattisgarh, through Secretaiy De^rtment of Panchayat Evam Grarnin Vikas Vib^iag, Dau Kalyaa Siagli Bhawaa, Ma4tralaya, Raipur (CG) CoU^ctor, Distt- Kaaker (CG) The| Chief Executive Officer, Zila Paachayat, Kanjker (CG) WRIT PETITIONiUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 8B: HON.SHRI DHIRENDttA MISHRA, J. 19-12-2008 Shri Viaay Pandey, cjounsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Arua Sao, GovtJ Advocate for the State. Heard. Grievance of the pe^itiouer is fhat for recniitnient of 4 posts of Shiksha Kanni Grade-I i(iider fhe OBC categoiy for subject 'Hiadi', vacancy was adverdsed by, tfae i-espondeut No.3 vide Arm.exure P-4. Out of the above 4 posts, l •^as reserved for feinale. candidate. The Chief Executive Of&cer, Distriifct Panchayat, Norfh Bastar, Kaiiker vide memorandum. of Aiuiexu4e P-5, dated 16t11 June 2008, informed fhe petitioner that her narne has been iacluded in fhe merit list and sbe was called upon to repo^t ou 25th June 2008 along wifh nepessaty ,^<i,"%, f & " 1<\ l' iEl8®?;¥- 8 § •'Sa.ii:,^ j. XI-HG—78 'S'si '^WM^, wrhww, ^wvy. NTHCd es*(Kh sii^rw ['t-ti* 'cl^ 3TI??l »)*i|ch ^ sn^i'^?^' ('^fg^s?) ¥(<nwatefaB^f -<? <M^CT<fit ^CT?ff ^ t?^ tF'tj^R ^a.ffimsn^g testunonials for its verificatijin. She appeared on the given date, her testiuionials were foiuid in ol-der after verification. However, thereafter, she has not received any coinjmT-uiication regarding her appoiiitment, The petitioner has ajready subiuitted her representation of Annexure P-6, dated 14.' representatiou has also not b writ petitiou, before fh.e respj withia a period of one week '.2008 in this regard. However, her ;en. decided till date. Leamed counsel for th^ State subniits ttiat ia case the petitioner files a fresh representation fo^ redressal ofher grievances, laised in this ^ndent No.3 aloug with copy of this order, |froia today, fhe same shaU be considered and decided wifhia a furthe|' period of three weeks from. tlie date of receipt of the represeutation. In view ofthe above s4bmission ofleamed counsel for fhe State, this petition is disposed of^ifh liberty to fhe petitioner to file a fresh of her grievaiices before fhe respondent ^ order within a week from. today. On such representation for redressal No.3 along with a copy of thil representation beiag laade, pie same shatl be considered aad decided by the respondent No.3 in acfcordance wifh law on its own. nierits wifhia a further period of fhree |weeks fi-oia fhe date of receipt of the representation. 1 DhirendraMishra Judge