1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4203 OF 2009 Zingabhoi Matsya Vyavsaik Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. through its secretary .. petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondent. --- Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate for the respondent No.5. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1] By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 1/7/2009 passed by the respondent No. 2 in the revision filed by the petitioner No.5. The respondent No. 7 has reconstructed the petitioner society. Being aggrieved thereby, the respondent No. 5 has filed an appeal before the respondent No. 6. However, when the appeal itself was pending, it appears 2 that a further revision has been preferred before the Honourable Minster in which revision, the Honourable Minster has passed the impugned order staying the order passed by the respondent No. 6. . I am of the considered view that it was not proper on the part of the respondent NO.2 to have interfered in the proceedings when the appeal itself was pending before the respondent No. 6. However, in the facts of the present case, I find that interest of justice would be met by directing the respondent No. 6 to decide the appeal filed by the respondent No. 5, within a period of 2 weeks from today. It is reported that the respondent No. 6 has posted the matter for hearing on 18th of July, 2009. The petitioner so also the respondent No. 5 would, therefore, appear before the respondent No. 6 on the said date, on which date, the respondent No. 6 shall hear the petitioner and the respondent No. 5. As directed, the appeal shall be disposed of within a period of two weeks from today. . An authenticated copy of this order be given to the learned AGP to act upon. It is further made clear that till the decision of the appeal, the rights for fishing in Majalgaon Dam shall not be finalized by the respondent No. 4. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] Grt/- 3