IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42064 of 2010 TUNTUN RAI @ PRAMOD RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner prays for bail after the same has been cancelled on account of misuse of the privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is true that the petitioner can be said to be guilty of misusing the privilege of bail but on the earlier occasion it had happened for the reason that the petitioner had not received the notice on the commitment of the case. It is further submitted by learned counsel that the petitioner has since the cancellation of his bail on the second occasion remained in custody from 26.5.2010,i.e., for nearly seven months and since there are as many as 15 accused persons in this case, the trial is not likely to be concluded within a short period. On a consideration of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner (Tuntun Rai alias Pramod Rai) is directed to be released - 2 - on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in Bihta P.S. Case No.31 of 1996 (Sessions Trial No.865/1999)to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Danapur subject to the conditions that the petitioner shall be personally present in Court on all the dates and on his failure to do so on any date, his bail bond shall stand cancelled. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )