/ m“ { \cci f“ @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. No. 5896¢i_/2004 Petitioner : SMT. URMILA DESHMUKH, W/o Jivdhanlal Deshmukh aged about 57 years, R/o Amapara, Irrigation Colony, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K,S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education OEicer, Durg‘; Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Balod, Distt. Durg V(C.G.) 4. Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Amapara, Balod Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA k " ‘aAi ,g/C~\ /% u mm {2’37} wt 200‘, ma mmwm WWW‘ WTWR %aw%rqa11%¥r 03/08I2004: - _*u__ Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsei fo ' the petitioner. Shri V,V‘S. Munhy‘ Dy. Advocate Generai, with Shri U.N.S Deo, G.A., Shri Yashwant Thakur, GA‘, Shri Satish ta,, Dy.G.A., Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shri Sandeep Dubey, Pane! Lawyers, forthe tate/respondents. Apphcation for urgent hearing is a lowed. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner ubmits that the matter relates to transfer of the petitioner. He furthersubmite that for the present the petitioner may be given an opportunity of filing the detailed represen tion before the Competent Authority of the respondents, which shall be considered its own merits in accordance with law. Having heard and considered t rival contentions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the o inion of this Court ends ofjustice would be served if a direction is given to the petitio er to make a detailed representation raising her grievance before the State/Compete t Authority of the respondents along with a copyrof the petition and this order, within en days, and on such representation being made, the competent authority of the r spondents shall consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance wi h law as early as possible, preferably within. six weeks from the date of receipt of the r presentation. lf any contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice, the ame be considered on its own merits Learned counsel for the petitio er prays that atter the decision of the representation, if any grievance of the pe itioner remains she may be allowed to avail the remedyavailable under the Law. lt is open to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the law. / With the aforesaid observations t is petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M W P If any, sta ds disposed i Certrfed copy as per, rules i i Sdl- / Copy to State counsel for compliariice. Fakhruddin Judge i , Jo H .miee K “s [stat %ha?t G p h