R.F.A. No. 902 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 902 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 7.3.2011 Bishamber Dayal and another .... Appellants vs Haryana State and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Narender Sura, Mr. S. K. Yadav, Advocates, Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for Mr. N. D. Achint, Advocate, for the landowners. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J This order will dispose of RFA Nos. 902, 3490, 4943 to 4945, 4665, 4887 of 2010, as common question of law and facts are involved therein. The landowners have filed the appeals seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 8.9.1997 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estates of villages Wazirabad and Chakarpur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon, for public purpose. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector') awarded compensation of acquired land @ ` 12,00,000/- per acre for chahi, ` 9,60,000/.- per acre for albarani, ` 8,40,000/- per acre for bhood, and ` 7,20,000/- per acre for banjar kind of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 717/- per square yard. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. R.F.A. No. 902 of 2010 (2) Learned counsel for the landowners submitted that the issues raised in the present set of appeals are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 1824 of 2006 Sudama and others vs The State of Haryana and another, decided on 1.10.2010, whereby the market value land acquired vide notification of the same date was determined @ ` 1,520/- per square yard. Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Sudama's case (supra), the appeals are disposed of in the same terms. 7.3.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge