IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8540 of 2008. Decided on 20.07.2010. _____________________________________________________ Shri S.P. Kapur. …Petitioner. -Versus- H.P. State Electricity Board and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that his pay was not fixed in accordance with law. Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, learned counsel for the respondent-Board submits that the pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed, however, he has not been paid any interest on the arrears 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay simple interest @ 6% per annum to the petitioner on the arrears of salary, within a period of three months from today. No costs. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 20, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?