s ll}! THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTILSGARH AT liILA$PUR WRITIPETITION (s) No. WLgQA‘Q WRITP_§_TITION UNDER ARTICLE 22(§__Q_E_JJ_‘!_E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA‘ Smt. Maxima Minj, aged 54 years Minj, occupation —~ . c, resea‘nltw‘ working 'a' t. li’rln'lary School'- , as Khand ar'iis'tt. Ralgarh (CG) '/ VERSUSw 1. ‘ tisgmh through artrrmgnt lof, 'Sch'oo ti au Kalyan Singh (CAR) . Eion fficer, R 3. n o (Treury, /Po, ‘sur ((3 3) ic u E‘iiflmr, 'Biock Bok Edcation — a Dis Raigarh (CG) Dharmjaigarh, ; .. Distt. & A/c wag 3mm“ y , W/o Shri Ciarlus Asst Téaher p s Head Master, GOV Aamgaon Vik Dhamjagarhb p State ofChhat Secretary, .Dep l " Educaon, D t B‘hawan, Raipur 2 District ducat O raigarh (CG) [Joit Directr as "enSin) Biiap 4. EWWW mm ..................................1............1:1 zoo mm (ma) mmw WWW WWW f§Q§m aiaimm mmm B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Moha 05-08-2010 Shri A‘ N. Bhakta, counse! for Shri Vinod Tekam, Panél La er for the Stateirespondents on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing the ‘pet'rtioner submits that the petitioner is entitied to benefit of tw advance increments on account of she having passed B.T.i. examinatio before her appointment at her own cost It is submitted that the issue i votved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finaiiy decided by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of MP, & Ors., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. It is furt submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in his or er dated 06-02-2009 passed in W,P.(S)Not6257 of 2008. Learned c unsel for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order date 29—04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upo the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87l2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21 09 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded In the petition Learned counsel for the res ondents submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered o the same lines. S n hrivastava J. r h d W31 mzoo whim (W) mm am v.1» WWW mm#wm $aimm TUmanS ’ In view of the statement m decide the claim of the petitioner for ade above, this petition is finaliy disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded i ’ weeks from today. n the petition within a period of eight / , om Sd/— ., z Mahindra Mohan Shrivastavai aJudge . x W aim wheat, xwafqrr'ra ——FSI14’7;2/20I 0 —1 ,oo,ooo. '\ t