1 CP NO.374/2009. 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.374/2009. (Tukaram Gotiram Pawar Vs. Shri Katpure, Tahsildar, Soygaon) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.ML Dharashive, Adv. For petitioner; Mr.VB Ghatge, AGP for State; *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 14 th DECEMBER, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The grievance of the petitioner was, in spite of two orders in his favour, his name is not mutated. However, the affiant – Satish Dnyanoba Katpure, has explained in paragraph 16 of the reply that Additional Collector though has passed an order in his favour, however, the matter is pending before the higher authorities. The name of the petitioner, in the situation, could not be entered in the cultivation column. A reference is categorically given,being Case No.125/2007 pending before the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad. There is nothing to controvert about disposal of the said proceedings No. 125/2007. 2 CP NO.374/2009. 3) No contempt, contempt petition dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/