1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAW No.3068 of 2009 in WP No.5295 of 2009 (D) (Shri Shital Lalwani v. M/s. Hotel Balbir Inn Pvt. Ltd.), CAW No.3069 of 2010 in WP No.5296 of 2009 (D) (Laxman Narayan Parate v. M/s. Hotel Balbir Inn Pvt. Ltd.), CAW No.3070 of 2010 in WP No.5305 of 2009 (D) (Smt. Savitri Laxman Parate v. M/s. Hotel Balbir Inn Pvt. Ltd.), CAW No.3071 of 2010 in WP No.5300 of 2009 (D) (Charan s/o Sunderlal Kanojiya v. M/s. Hotel Balbir Inn Pvt. Ltd.), And CAW No.3072 of 2010 in WP No.5301 of 2009 (D) (Pankaj Roshan Chandanna v. M/s. Hotel Balbir Inn Pvt. Ltd.) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri A.M. Qazi, Advocate for Applicants/Petitioners. Shri A.G. Gharote, Advocate for Respondent. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 30 th November, 2010 On 19-12-2009, this Court had passed an order as under : 2 “Heard S/Shri Ghodeswar, ahnd Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners and S/Shri Gharote and Sawal, learned counsel for respondent No.1. This Court has on 08.12.2009 passed orders in five writ petitions and at that time the impression was that the undertaking duly signed by the petitioners-tenants was on record. Later on it has been pointed out to this Court that there is no such undertaking on record and both the counsel have pointed out that the order passed by this Court in LPA Nos.362/2009, 363/2009 and 368/2009 on 07.09.2009 should have been passed in writ petitions. The applications have been taken out for that purpose. Shri Sawal, learned counsel for the respondent-landlord has no objection. Accordingly, the order dated 08.12.2009 are recalled and the following orders are passed : 1. Time till 30.11.2010 is given to the petitioners to vacate the premises, subject to their filing an undertaking before this Court by 10 th January 2010. 2. If the undertaking is not so filed, the respondent-landlord shall be at liberty to execute the decree for possession. 3. If the undertaking is filed, the decree to the extent of possession shall not execute till 30.11.2010. 3 In view of these orders, writ petitions are disposed of. Civil Applications are accordingly allowed.” Now the present civil applications have been moved for grant of extension of time by a further period of six months to enable the applicants/petitioners to vacate the business premises on the ground that there was a gap of communication between the counsel appearing for the applicants/petitioners and the applicants/petitioners. Keeping in view the fact that this Court had recalled the order dated 8-12-2009 and granted time till 30-11-2010 to the applicants/petitioners to vacate the business premises subject to their filing an undertaking before this Court by 10-1-2010, the reason stated that there was a gap of communication, cannot be accepted. The civil applications are, therefore, dismissed. Judge pdl