IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1599 of 2008 PUSHPA SINHA & ORS Versus AMRESHWAR NARAYAN SINHA & ANR ----------- 2. 19.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order rejecting amendment in the written statement is absolutely correct. Paragraphs 19 and 20 of the original written statement would itself reveal that the said M.I.G. house was already alleged to be the joint family property and therefore, proposed amendment in the written statement would have served no purpose. That being so, this Court would not find any error in the impugned order. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/