IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13675 of 2009 SUBODH KUMAR SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS For the Petitioner: Satish Chandra Jha-3. For the State : G.P. 4 ----------- 2/ 29/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In pursuance of certain orders of this Court the case of the petitioner for regularization along with others was referred to a three men committee of the State authorities which has now submitted its report dated 6.5.2008 at annexure-7. The submission is that despite a recommendation for regularization, the matter remains pending and it is not being acted upon. Learned counsel for the State submits that if there is a recommendation, it is required to be acted upon in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed with directions to the respondents to implement the recommendation in accordance with law forthwith without unnecessary delay so that if the petitioner is required to approach this Court again for the same relief for delay attributable to the respondents, this Court may view the matter seriously for generating unnecessary litigation. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)