1 13.wp10439.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10439 OF 2011 Asha Siddheshwar Dattu. ....Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Priyal Sarda, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. P.S. Cardozo, AGP for Respondent No. 1. Mr. S.B. Shetye, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- DECEMBER 1, 2011 P.C. Not on board. Upon production taken on board. 2. By the impugned order, the objection taken by the Petitioner to the nomination of Mrs. Aruna Murlidhar Dattu has been rejected and the nomination paper is accepted. The Petitioner had two remedies, one to file an Appeal under Rule 15 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayat Election Rules, 1966 within 3 days to the District Judge. In this case that has not been done. The remedy of the Petitioner is now to 2 13.wp10439.11 file an Election Petition under the provisions of Section 21 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Township Act, 1965. In view of the bar contained in Article 243 ZG of the Constitution of India, the Petition cannot be entertained so as to arrest the process of election. Hence leaving the remedy of filing of election petition under Section 21 open, this Petition is not entertained only on that ground. The same is dismissed with no order as to costs. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)