IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52485 of 2008 RAVI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Amesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya,A.P.P. --- 3 09.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for Mr. Ravi Kumar one of the FIR named accused of Chandi (Wena) P.S. Case No. 106 of 2008 registered under sections 376/511, 307/34 and other allied sections of Penal Code who is in custody since 31.7.2008. There is specific allegation against the petitioner both by informant and other witnesses of the petitioner along with his “associates in arms” attempting to outrage the modesty of the informant and receiving accolades from the onlooking associates. Though the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no rape had been committed on the victim girl, the very overt act by the petitioner and his associates gives a very sour and caustic taste to the whole episode which no person in the society would appreciate. In the facts and circumstances of the case I do not find this is an appropriate case that the petitioner should be given concession of bail. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. The Petitioner may renew his prayer after one year. Spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)