BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14818 of 2011 R.GUNASEKARAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, KARUR. (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.KATHIRVELU SENIOR COUNSEL FOR MR.KARTHIKEYA VENKITACHALAPATHY For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C in Crime No.Not Known of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. He has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.V.Kathirvelu, learned Senior counsel representing for Mr.S.Karthikeya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3. According to the submission of the learned Senior Counsel, the petitioner is compelled by the respondent police to execute the document in favour of the defacto complainant. He would further submit that the petitioner is also stated to have withdrawn the money of the father and utilise the same for his purposes. 4. The learned learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that there is no petition is pending with the respondent police and there is no F.I.R against the petitioner. 5. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petition filed by the petitioner seeking for anticipatory bail is closed. However, the petitioner is said to have coerced by the police to execute the document in favour of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ defacto complainant, which is not permissible in law, since it is purely a civil dispute. With the aforesaid observation, this petition is closed. sd/- 30/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION,KARUR. +1. CC to M/S.KARTHIKEYA VENKITACHALAPATHY, Advocate SR.No.42000 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14818 of 2011 Date :30/11/2011 SMA/02.12.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/