: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER OF SUMMONS NO.784 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.904 OF 2010 Dilip Bachubhai Patel & Ors. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Edwin Civil Engineering .. Defendant And M/s. Prem Leela Investments & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Ashish Kamat i/by Gauri S. Rao for the plaintiffs / applicant in CHS. Ms. Rajani Iyer with Mr. R.A. Shah i/by M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for defendant no.1 Mr. S.K. Chaurasia for respondent no.1. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 17th JUNE, 2010. P.C. : 1. In the normal course, plaintiffs could have tendered draft amendment and have the plaint amended, instead they chose to file this chamber summons. Since we are at the threshold of this suit proceedings, the plaintiffs can be granted liberty to amend the plaint : 2 : by treating Schedule to the chamber summons as draft amendment. Hence, the following order. ORDER (i) Plaintiffs are permitted to carry out amendment in terms of Schedule to the Chamber Summons. After the plaintiffs carry out amendment in terms of this order, they shall serve upon the defendants as well as newly added defendants amended copy of the plaint. (ii) They are permitted to carry out amendment in the notice of motion. After the amendments are carried out, plaintiff to serve defendants, give 48 hours notice and then apply for ad- interim relies in terms of the motion. In view of this order, chamber summons stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)