IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTY DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.20 OF 2005 Between: Gorrila Simhadri ..... Petitioner/Accused/Appellant AND 1. Pyla Ramanjaneyulu ..... Complainant 2. The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ..... Respondents The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner/1st respondent; Sri Chidambaram, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the 1st respondent/petitioner; and Sri K. Venkateshwar Rao, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor are present. 2. The petitioner/1st respondent has filed a compromise petition, under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, read with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2799 of 2009, stating that the matter has been compromised by and between both the parties. 3. Both the parties are present in person. They are identified by their learned counsel. They stated that they have compromised the matter. Hence, a compromise is recorded in terms of the compromise petition. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as compromised in view of the compromise effected in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2799 of 2009. __________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) Date: 25th November, 2009 KL