-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9260 OF 2009. Purnima Salunke. ..Petitioner. Versus Ganesh Gramin Patsanstha & Others. ..Respondents. Smt. Rachana Chavan for the petitioner. Mr. V. S. Talkute for respondent no.1. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for respondent nos. 2 to 4. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : August 18, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By the impugned order, respondent no.4 - the Divisional Joint Registrar rejected the petitioner’s revision application for non compliance of provisions of Section 154(2-A) of the MCS Act. Compliance of section 154(2-A) of the MCS Act are held mandatory by the catena of decisions of this Court. A reference can be made to the decision of this court reported in 2004(3) BCR 229. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. 3. However, in the interest of justice, in order to enable the petitioner to exhaust the remedy of revision under section 154, the petitioner is granted liberty to deposit an amount equivalent to 50% the recovery certificate with respondent no.1. The petitioner shall do that exercise srp -: 2 :- within the period of five weeks from today. In the event, the petitioner deposits the aforesaid amount within the stipulated time, the impugned order stands quashed and set aside and the revision application of the petitioner shall stand restored to its file. In that eventually, respondent no.4 shall decide the same on merits. 4. With these observations, writ petition stands disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.)