WP(C) 3615/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. A. K. Hussain, learned counsel for the Petitioner, and Mr. B. K. Sharm a, learned Government counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6. Heard also Ms. R. Gogoi, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. Pursuant to the order, dated 22.01.2010, passed, in WP(C) No. 3615/2010, whereby the Court had directed the respondent no. 1 therein to dispose of the p etitioner’s representation by making a speaking order. An order has accordingly been passed, on 27.07.2010, by the respondent No. 1 and a copy thereof has been placed on record. From the order, dated 22.01.2010, aforementioned, what transpires is tha t the petitioner had made allegations of illegal selection of Anganwadi workers/ helpers at various Anganwadi Centres under Noduar ICDS Project. On being asked, the petitioner had furnished a list of 41 Anganwadi Centres, where appointment of persons from outside the village/locality had been allegedly made. The respo ndent No. 1 has accordingly decided to get the cases of the selected candidates, in respect of the said 41 Anganwadi Centres, examined by conducting necessary e nquiry with the help of respondent No. 4, namely, the Deputy Commissioner, Sonit pur. As far as the remaining Anganwadi Centres are concerned, the respondents h ave sought for appropriate order(s) allowing them to proceed with the selections , which have already been made. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, r espondent No. 1, namely, Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Social Welfare Department, is hereby directed to get an enquiry made by the resp ondent No. 4, namely, Deputy Commissioner, Sonitpur, as has been reflected by th e order, dated 27.07.2010, aforementioned and, thereafter, respondent No. 1 shal l pass further appropriate order(s) on the basis of the enquiry report, which sh all be completed by respondent No. 4 within a period of three months from the da te, when the requisite communication, as directed above, is made by the responde nt No. 1, and, until then, no appointment, in respect of the said 41 Anganwadi C entres, shall be made. In terms of the directions, given hereinbefore, the respo ndent No. 1 shall issue, within a period of one week from to-day, necessary offi cial communication, as regards holding of the enquiry by respondent No. 4. As f ar as the remaining Anganwadi Centres are concerned, the respondents are given t he liberty to make appointments in terms of the selections, which might have alr eady been made. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall sta nd disposed of.