-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU (PIL) WRIT PETITION NO. 20 OF 2008 Francis John Rodrigues ).. Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ).. Respondents Mr Rajiv Chavan a/w Ms Rutuja Ambekar for Union of India. Mr Shekhar Shete i/b Ms S R Gudhka for Respondent No.4. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2009 P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. It is not in dispute before us that CIDCO has already allotted the land to Respondent No.4 and have also been provided the funds for construction. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 states that though they are entitled to possession forthwith, but as a matter of goodwill they are prepared to give one year time for vacating the premises. Respondent No.4 shall vacate the premises within one year -2- from today and shall furnish an undertaking to that effect. 3. Writ Petition disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D Y CHANDRACHUD, J.