IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2010 / 15TH POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 1233 of 2009(G) ---------------------- IN WPC.33908/2009 Dated 04/12/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- P.SAJEEV,PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KALLARA VILLAGE OFFICE,VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE, VAIKOM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,KALLARA. BY SR.GP K.R.DEEPA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- R.P.1233/2009 in W.P.(C).33908/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2010 ORDER The observations in paragraphs 2 and 5 of the judgment show that while disposing of this writ petition, this Court was under the impression that the petitioner was paid wages at the rate of Rs.1250/- + DA and that the same was subsequently reduced to Rs.1000/- + DA. It is pointed out that the said observation in the judgment is incorrect. In view of this, it is clarified that if, as a matter of fact, the petitioner has not been paid wages at Rs.1250/- + DA so far, the aforesaid observation in the judgment will not work to his prejudice as and when his claim is considered by the authorities. Review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs