IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 8TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 14251 of 2010(F) ------------------------ PETITIONER : ----------------- FR.RAJESH MARTIN, SECRETARY, BISHOP JEROME GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, FATHIMA COLLEGE ROAD, KOLLAM-691 001. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, THE HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, KOLLAM. 3. THE CONVENER, AITUC, CHEMMAMUKKU UNIT, C/O.OFFICE OF AITUC, KOLLAM. 4. THE CONVENER, CITU, KAPPALANDIMUKKU UNIT, C/O.OFFICE OF CITU, KOLLAM. 5. THE CONVENER, INTUC, KAPPALANDIMUKKU UNIT, C/O.OFFICE OF INTUC, KOLLAM. 6. THE CONVENER, BMS, KAPPALANDIMUKKU UNIT, C/O.OFFICE OF INTUC, KOLLAM. 7. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST CIRCLE, KOLLAM. ...2/- WP(C).No. 14251 of 2010(F) -2- 8. THE SUB NSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 9. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, KOLLAM. R1, R7 TO R9 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. RANI DIOTHIMA R2 BY ADV. SRI.KOSHY GEORGE, SC, KHLWWB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...3/- WP(C).No. 14251 of 2010(F) -3- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE TRUST DEED NO. 27 OF 2010 EXECUTED BY THE BISHOP OF THE LATIN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF QUILON. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPUTERIZED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED NIL ISSUED BY AICTE. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PERMISSION NO. TP2 (PW10)BRC.311.08-09 DATED 9.11.2009 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOLLAM. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30-04-2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.14251 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Service complete. None appears. The complaint made is that the private respondents are unnecessarily interfering with certain construction activities in relation to educational institution which is stated to be running with the approval of AICTE. This Court had issued an interim order on 13.5.2010, after service of notice on the respondents, to the following effect, which is not even objected to: “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though respondents have been served with notice, they have not entered appearance either in person or though counsel. Having regard to the entire facts and circumstances, we are satisfied that respondents 1, WPC.14251/10 2 7 and 8 are to be directed to render necessary and effective protection to the loading and unloading activities at the petitioner's premises by engaging his own workmen (whose names are mentioned in paragraph No.6 of the writ petition) without any hindrance or obstruction from respondents 3 to 6 or their men and supporters.” We have considered the matter. We are satisfied that there is no reason why the said order shall not be made absolute. In the result, the aforesaid interim order is made absolute and the writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN, Judge. kkb.01/10.