^ HIGH COURT OP CHIiAMq^iARH AT BILASPUR 8S.C.C. N0. 414/2QQ7 PBTITIONBR APPLICANT RBSPONDBNTS 1. , Gram Paachayat Mangsa Through Secretaiy, Anil Kiunar Baghel, S/o. Tilak Ram Baghel, Aged about 47 years, Occupatioxi-Secretary Giam Panchayat-Mangsa, R/o, Village Pafhari, Village Dharaiva, Distt, Raipur (CG) Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Paiichayat, D.K.S. Buildiag, Maiitmlaya, Raipur (CG) 2, Additional CoUector, Raipur 3. S.D.O. (Prescribed Authority) Raipur (CG) 4, Presidiag OfiBcer aiid Additional Tahsildar, Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur (CG) 5, Taramati Venna, Ex-Sarpaach, Gram Panchayat-Maagsa, Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur (CG) APPLICATION POR MODIFICATION OF THB ORDER DATBD 31.08.2007 (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satisli K. Agnlliotrl, J.) !/" Ms. DeepaM Paadey, counsel for the ^titioiier. Shri Vivek Sharma, Paael Lawyer for fhe State. ORDBR (Passed on this 8*h day of October, 2007) Learaed counsel appearmg fbr tie petitioner submits fhat iaadvertently it has been stated in flie order dated 31.08.2007 fhat c^unsel for the petitioner could not appear on account ofbonafide mistake when fhe Writ Petition (C) No. 3036/2007 was dismissed on 20.06.2007. The petition was dismissed on 20.06.2007 aot on account of not being present but on account of fhe fact &at "^ two weeks' time was graated to rexaove the default failmg which fbe petition stood disniissed, witlioiit rcfereaice to fhe Court as the default could not be removed withm the prcscribed period, The first paragraph offhe order dated 31et August 2007 stands corrected to fhe extent fhat learaed counsel for fhe petitioner had renioved fhe default belatedly aad fhe first part I be read as under : ^Learaed counsel for fhe petitkmer submits that fhe petition was disxuissed on 20/06/2007 on accoxiat offhe faet that ftie default could xiot be made good wlfhia the prescribed tune." The application is acconliagly ordered. Thus, fhe Writ Petition No. 3036/2007 be rcstored to its me. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge y