IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.10731 of 1993 Date of decision May 4 , 2012 Ved Parkash s/o Sh. Durga Dass working as Junior Asstt.in the office of Block Primary Education Officer, Dhariwal-II, Distt. Gurdaspur and others. ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through the Secretary to Govt.of Punjab, Education Department, Chandigarh. ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG., Punjab **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The Registry has reported that petitioner No.9 and 23 have died. The same is recorded. Notice to several petitioners which have been sent have been returned unserved. I do not find that any further opportunity of notice need be given to any person who had not been served. If the counsel for the petitioners who had been earlier engaged state that he had no instructions, there is no necessity for serving the petitioners. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The writ petition is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 4, 2012 archana