IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 22 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 569 OF 2010 M/S. REAL ESTATE AGENCIES REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR. KEDAR R. KAKODKAR ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA, GOVT. OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Rajendra V. Pai, Mrs. Bina R. Pai and Mr. Samir Taleigaonkar, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. A. Kakodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Joseph Vaz, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.8. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 25th October, 2010 P.C.:- (1) The applicant herein who was the respondent No.5 in the original Writ Petition No.569/2010 seeks a review of our order dated 6th September, 2010. (2) When the original petition came up for hearing before us on 6th September, 2010, the petitioner through its Counsel tendered a copy of a letter dated 3rd September, 2010 and informed us that in view of the letter the petitioner's grievance was resolved and nothing survived in his petition. Accepting the statement, we disposed of the petition. (3) Mr. Pai, learned Counsel for the applicant herein (respondent No.5 in the original writ petition) states that the order disposing of the petition affects the applicant's rights. The respondent No.5 was present before the Court through its Counsel when we passed the order dated 6th September, 2010. No objection was raised by respondent No.5 at that time for disposal of the writ petition as also to the statement of the original writ petitioner. Consequently, in our view, the present application is misconceived. The applicant is free to adopt such steps for protecting/enforcing its rights, if there be any, in accordance with law. (4) With these observations, the application is disposed of. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.