:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1841 OF 2009 Ashok Bapu Suryawanshi .. Petitioner. Vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation .. Respondent. Mr.M.S.Topkar for the petitioner. Mr.G.A.Karmalkar i/b G.S.Hegde for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2009. DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has impugned an order dated 27.3.2008 passed by the Industrial Court dismising his revision application (ULP) No.10/2006 and confirming the order passed by the Labour Court dated 16.3.2004. The petitioner had filed complaint (ULP) No.187 of 1990 challenging his dismissal order dated 19.2.1990 alleging unfair labour practise on the part of the respondents. 3. The only submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is that no sufficient opportunity was given to the petitioner to adduce evidence on merits by the Labour Court and in view :2: :2: :2: thereof the impugned judgment deserves to be set aside and matter be remanded to the Labour Court allowing the petitioner to adduce evidence and decide the complaint afresh on merit. I find no substance in the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, more particularly in view of the findings recorded in paragraph 10 of the impugned order. From the observations in paragraph 10 of the impugned order it is clear that sufficient time was granted to the petitioner to adduce evidence, but the complainant-petitioner failed to adduce evidence on the adjourned dates. From perusal of the impugned order it is also clear that both the courts below have considered entire material on record and passed the impugned orders. It is pertinent to note that in the enquiry, the complainant did not raise the contention at any point of time stating that no sufficient opportunity was given to defend himself. In the circumstances I find no merit in the writ petition. The petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)