IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10299 of 2006 KUMARI PUSHPA Versus MAGADH UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- For the petitioner : M/s Banwari Sharma & Shiv Kumar,Advocates For the University : Mr. Jai Shankar Barna- wal, Advocate For the N.C.T.E. : Mr.S.N.Pathak,S.C.C.G. ------------ 04/ 31.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents-authorities to publish the result of B.Ed. Examination held in the year 1998 of sessions 1995-96, in which petitioner claims to have appeared. In support of his claim he has enclosed Admit Card issued by the University under the signature of the then Controller of Examination. The respondent-University has filed counter affidavit, in which they have taken a stand that as per the Tabulation Register of the University no such roll number namely, Roll No.1319 exists for the examination of the sessions. In the context of Annexure-1, photostat copy of the Identity - 2 - Card issued by the College showing her roll number in the College as 06 of sessions 1995- 96, it is stated in the counter affidavit that the name of one Anuradha Trivedi is mentioned in the College records against the said roll number. Thus, the respondents have denied that the petitioner is a genuine student of the institution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the University has not produced any documents in support of its stand and, therefore, they may be directed to place before this Court the original Tabulation Register, Scroll of Examination, attendance sheet etc. to verify the claim of the petitioner. In reply, learned counsel for the University submits that the matter is before the Vigilance and the Vigilance is holding an enquiry with regard to the bungling committed in different Colleges including this institution and all records are in the custody of Vigilance. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to call for any records to the - 3 - University or the College, as that may hamper the investigation being conducted by the Vigilance. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Vigilance and request the Vigilance to consider her case separately with reference to the records of the University and the College available with it or in respective offices. If the Vigilance finds from the records that the genuineness of the candidature of the petitioner is established beyond doubt, it may recommend the case of the petitioner before the University for publication of her result. With the above observations this writ application is disposed of. ( J. N. Singh, J. ) A.H.