1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 200 OF 2011 ( Mohd. Zakir @ Chhotu Vs. State of Maharashtrta PSO PS Sitabuldi Nagpur) ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri A. M. Rizwy Adv for applicant. Shri N. R. Rode APP for non applicant/State. CORAM: M. N. GILANI J. DATED: 5th JULY, 2011. . The applicant who has been arrayed as an accused in Crime No. 182 of 2011 registered with the Police Station Sitabuldi Nagpur for the offences punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 149, 324, 326 and 307 of Indian Penal Code is seeking anticipatory bail. Incident occurred on 21.05.2011. One Vikki Ramesh lodged F. I. R. There was quarrel between two groups. In that the group led by one Babbu assaulted Chandraprakash and Kalu Daka. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely roped in. No role is attributed to him even if the F. I. R. as it is, is accepted. 2 Peruse reply filed by learned APP and the case diary. It is mentioned in the F. I. R. that group led by Babbu attacked Chandraprakash and Kalu Daka. The name of the applicant appears in the F. I. R. It is true that complainant did not narrate in detail as to which accused played what role. However, it is categorically stated that Babbu and his associates including the present applicant attacked the injured with knife, gupti, sword etc. Therefore, ingredients of Section 149 or in the alternative of Section 34 Indian Penal Code are attracted. On the person of Chandraprakash three incised wounds were noticed. Fourth injury was on the nose and the doctor suspected the fracture of nasal bone. On the person of Kalu Daka 8 incised wounds were noticed. This seems to be the reason for registering offence under Section 326, 307 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Considering the evidence of involvement of the applicant, the anticipatory bail cannot be granted. Application is rejected. JUDGE svk 3 From the date of taking charge i.e. from 17.03.2011 till 06.05.2011 His Lordship Hon'ble Shri Justice M.N. Gilani was sitting at High Court Bombay.