^ c^ i^ \V5t 00 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH . 1^'^..2- /2011 ..•* o^ ><...••• ^^ ^v^^.- ^^&€^ •^M\>^ r ; '"/" <>'. ' 1. Smt. Kurdula Ekka, W/o Amal Das Ekka, aged about 49 years, working as Head Master Priniary School, Jakba, Block-Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal WeUare Departrnent, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) ^' Block Education Officer, Block -.Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) \w" Ktil- ^ i:^ ••8|>.. ^ ^ '3^,""iU: PETiTIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH,:^B!i-ASPUR WRIT PETITION ?S) N0. 1762 OF 201 ^ Smt. Kurdula Ekka RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. AdvocaSe for the State. QRDER (ORAU (Passed on this 01st day of Aprii, 2011) 1. Heard iearned counsel for ths parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increments on account of havins passed B.T.!. examination in the year 1983 before her appointment i.e. on 30.11.1994,at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra, as the same has been finaily decided bytheSupreme CourtinAsha Saxena v. StateofM.P. & Ors. . 3. !t is further submitteci that this Court has also teken a simitar view in its order dated 6-2-2009 passeci In W.P. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Lsarned counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed tn W.A.No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another W.A.No.87 of 2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts pleaded in the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the case of the petitioner wouid also be considered on the same lines. 5. ln view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of hvo advance increments, as per the circular dated 21-9-1974, issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of 8 weeks from today. Sd/- Judge 12009(II!)MPJR(SC)59