HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SinaleBench: Hon'ble Shri DiliDl^iosahebDeshniukh.J. :^r;:- Miscellaneous Civll Case No.SS of 2008 ApDlicants 1. Urmila W/o Purshottam.aged about 52years 2. PurshQteam, S/o Guteram, aged about55years. Both by caste - Dansena Kalar, Occupation - ^ricutture, Wo Lodhiya, Tahsil - Kharsiya, Distect Raigarh(C.G.) i versus Non'^applicant Chaitram S/o Kijipa Ram, aged not known, R/o Lodhjya, Tahsil- Kharsiya. District Raigarh (C.G.) ApDlication for Flestoration otthe FirstApo^ay No.9Q@W7io Ils orictjnaMiymber i Present: Shri Rajendra Tripathi, counsel fortie applicante. i ORALORDER (Passed on 5th of.March, 20@a) Heard on I.A.No.2, an application for condonadon of delay in filing Miscellaneous Civil CaseNo.^of2008lforrestorationofFirst Appeal No.90 of2007. The applicants have shown sufRcJentcause for condonatlon <rf delay. I.A.No.2 ts allowed. Delay In filing the miscellaneous civilcase is condoned. (2) Heard on Miscellaneous CMI Case NO.SS of 2008. (3) It is stated that the counsel for the appellante did n©tapp^r in the Court on 02-08-2007 due to ill-health. It has atso laeen stated ttiat theappellantsaFeresidentsofruralaFeaandtheyhavenooccasionto appear beforethe HighCourt. [ (4) Considering the grounds stated in Miseellaneeus CMI ©ase No.5S of2008, it is allowed. FiretAppeat No,90 of2007 is restored to its original number and be lisled. A Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^- Gopat