1 1.arbp-835-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 835 OF 2011. Nitin S. Joshi. ..Petitioner. vs. Tata Capital Limited. ..Respondent. .... Mr. S.A. Bhagawat, for Petitioner. Mr. M.N. Mehta, for Respondent. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER 2011. P.C. : The Petition is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, the learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner on instructions states that he has already paid the amount awarded by the learned Arbitrator to the Respondent and nothing remains to be paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent. The learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent states that the entire amount is not paid as alleged and certain amounts are yet to be paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent. 2. In view thereof, in the event of the Respondent taking out any proceedings in execution, it will be open for the Petitioner to contend that the entire amount has been paid and that the said proceedings are not maintainable. Needless to add that such proceedings shall be decided on its own merits. 3. In view thereof, the Arbitration Petition is disposed of as dismissed. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]