IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3008 of 2009 Between: V.Ravi ..... PETITIONER AND M.P.Arul and 8 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3008 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is the plaintiff. He filed the suit in O.S.2/2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Sathyavedu seeking permanent injunction against respondents Nos. 7 to 9. Respondents Nos.1 to 6 herein filed I.A. 80/2008 under Or.1 Rule-10(2) CPC seeking for their impleadment stating that they are necessary parties and they are to be added as defendants in the suit for effectual adjudication of the suit. Opposing the said application, the plaintiff filed elaborate counter seeking to dismiss the said application, but the trial Court without assigning any reasons and without dealing with any of the contentions of the rival parties, simply allowed the said I.A. by order dated 21.04.2009. Both the counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondents submits that there is no other reasoned order except the decretal order filed before this Court. This Court called for the lower Court record and perused the same and found that the Court below simply allowed the I.A. without passing any order on merits, though the plaintiff filed an elaborate counter, denying the averments of the petitioners therein. Whenever an application is filed under Or.1 Rule 10(2) CPC, the Court below ought to have dealt with all the contentions raised by the respective parties and passed a reasoned order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The Court below simply allowed the said petition by passing a docket order, which led to filing this civil revision petition. As the impugned order is without assigning any reasons, the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside, remitting the matter to the Court below, with a direction to hear both the parties and pass a reasoned order afresh, in accordance with law. The Civil Revision Petition is allowed accordingly. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 30.10.2009 Dsr