1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3921 OF 1993 Malkari Somanna Bhimgonda ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. None for the Petitioner Mr. V.S. Gokhale, Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag.C.J., & D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2005. P.C.:- 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of not granting him admission to D.Ed. Course. 2. Rule was issued and interim relief was granted in terms of prayer (f),which reads as under:- 2 “That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, respondents 1 and 2 herein be directed to admit the petitioner to D.Ed. Course for the academic year 1993-94 and the petitioner be allowed to complete the said course;” 3. It is obvious that the petitioner has completed his education, as there is no subsequent development during the last twelve years when the petition is pending for any other relief. After the interim order was worked out, the petition is rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed of as such.