THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22179 of 2002 Dated: 04.07.2007 Between: M. Ramaswami Goud and another … Petitioners AND The Deputy Commissioner of Excise and Prohibition, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad and two others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 22179 of 2002 ORDER:- The petitioners in this writ petition have sought for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent issued vide proceedings Cr.No.A3/205/2002 dated 14.10.2002 cancelling the TFT licenses of the petitioners at Netajinagar of Bandlaguda village, Ramachendrapuram Mandal, Medak District and proceedings Rc.No.B5/1400/2002 dated 11.07.2002 passed by the 1st respondent in dismissing the appeal of the petitioners as illegal, unlawful, contrary to law, unconstitutional and against the procedure contemplated under Rule 24 of A.P. Excise (Arack & Toddy Special Condition of License) Rules 1969 and the Division Bench judgment of the Hon’ble High Court as reported in 2001 (6) ALD 309 and consequently set aside others of the 2nd respondent dated 14.10.2002 with a direction to continue TFT licenses of the petitioners and pass such other order or orders which are necessary in the interest of justice.” When the case was called in the first round, there was no representation. Even when the case is called in the second round, after the same was passed over, there is no representation for the petitioners. It is therefore reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed in default. No costs. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.07.2007 ES