CHHATTISG." Al IISU^ u' •HJ 2X3T l^ A ?J1 Ram Pili D/o Shri Vishun Ram, aged about 22 years, Caste- Gond, Resident of Village 1.111CI; Village Panchavat Dumerkhola, Janpad Panchavat Balramnur. District Sureu'.a /r^ <n \ >; L/.lj. .u; i\.. 1 saTti.sgarfi, Staxe 01 Through: The Secretaiy, Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Ihawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. The District Programme :fics Develooment. Ambikanur. District Surguja (C.G.). 4. The Chief Execiitive Ofncer, Janpad Panchayat Balrampur District Surguja (C.G.) 5. Gram Panchayat Dumerkhola, Through: The Sarpaiich, Village Panehayat Dumerkhola, Janpad Paacfaayat Balrampur, &istrict Surguja (C.G.) imt. Meena Wife of Shri iiias, xesiaeni Village Dumerldiola, Village Panchayat Dumerkhola, Balram] ;.G.). .t S 1 ^ ^. 1 ? ^ »hriArvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respoadent No. 1 to3. (Passed on 3" ofApril, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the-appointment ofrespondeiit no, 6 a.s Angan Badi worker is contran'" to the nrovisions of Ansan Badi Scheme, The )etitioner has preferential right of appointment over the respondent no. 6 on the ground that the petitioner is living below the povert}' line, she belongs to Scbeduled Tribe Community and is having experience ofworkmg as Angan Badi Sah-Sahayika. Leamed counsel further submrts that tfae husband of the respondent ao. 6 is faolding the post of Sanskritik Sangathak. It is fiirther contended that the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.01.2007 (Annexure P/5), i.s pending consideration before the Collector, Surguja (Ambikapur). !e that as it may, the Collector Surguja (Ambikapur) is directed to look into the allegations by the petitioner as contained in her representation, Annexure P/5 and pass appropriate order after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties m accordarice with law and as per Angan Badi schem& within a Deriod of four wee.ks from the date of receint ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. — - - —-— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit 1