IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 36222 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision: May 14, 2010. Ramesh Kumar ...... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr.Advocate with Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.490, dated 17.09.2009, under Sections 489-A/489-C/489-D IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak, District Rohtak. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 17.09.2009. It is further CRM No.M-36222 of 2009 contended that only 23 currency notes i.e. 11 currency notes having one number and 12 currency notes having one number, were allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner alongwith photostat machine and printer. It is further contended that it will take time to conclude the trial as only two witnesses have been examined so far. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Ramesh Kumar is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Rohtak. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 14, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2