IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 569 OF 2006 THE GOA HERITAGE ACTION GROUP AND OTHERS ... Applicants Versus THE STATE OF GOA AND OTHERS ... Respondents Mr. A. Kakodkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate for R. 1 To 3 and 6 Coram:- S.A. BOBDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 18th June, 2007 P.C.:- Heard. The following order is passed by consent. In the last sentence of paragraph 6 instead of "Even otherwise, we find that "sub-section (2) of Section 17 (c)" substitute with "sub-section (3) of Section 17-C of the Goa Town and Country Planning Act as amended, provides as follows:- (3) On and from the date of withdrawal of the revised regional plan by plication of the notification under the provisions of sub-section (2) of this section, all development programmes undertaken by any Department of the Government or by public and private institutions or by any other person shall conform to be the provisions of the existing regional plan." Order accordingly. Application disposed of. S.A. BOBDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. rp