IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1748 of 2009 MITHILESH RAI Versus SHYAMA DAI DEVI & ORS ----------- 4. 7.7.2010 Heard Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite service of notice on some of the opposite parties as reported by the office and appearance of the name of Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh in the cause list, no one has appeared on behalf of the opposite parties. For the reasons mentioned in this application, the time for depositing cost awarded in the order dated 21.7.2008 is extended by a period of one month from today. It is made clear that if within the aforementioned extended period the petitioner would not deposit the amount in court for its being paid to the opposite parties, the petitioner will have no liberty to carry out the amendment already allowed by this Court by an order dated 21.7.2008. The earlier order of this Court dated 21.7.2008 in C.R.No. 381/2006 shall stand modified only to the aforementioned 2 extent. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/