S° mGHCOURTOFCHHATTTSGAJRHATBnASPUR Wnf Petitton(8) No, 3004 of20<W Tu'asraia Shyatn, aged about 61 yea*-s son of late Dashrath Shvam Retired Class III employw of the Establishment of the District and Sessions Judge, Bilaspur R/b Naya Sarkandajodapara Bilaspur(CG). VERSVS . RESPOND.ENTS : 1. State of Chhafdsgarh throiigh: Chief Secretary Law Department, State Dau K.a!?an Sinali Bhavan, Raipur WI:W^& . 2- District •& Sessions Judge, Bilaspur (CG) presided in bv Shri An'ind Shrivastava. 3. A^ccQiintaxit of the OiScc 01 Oistrict ^ SCSSIQBS Judge. Bilasour (CG) Shri Santosh Dewangan S/o Shri PAHI Krishna Dewaagan. ftVRTT PETmON ITNDER ARTICT.E 226 OF THE CONSTm.mON OP TNTDIA) ^SB.! {•lQntMe B^lr- S^tish KL A^xdh.otri. -J.^ Present : Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dsoutv Go\t. Advocate for the State. QRALORDER (Passed on 19*" day ufJime, 2008) 1. Witli the coaseat of t!ie parties, f!ie matter 's taken up for hearing finaUy. &? 2. This Detition Dcrt^ins to og.vsnc'nt o£rctiralbcnefits, 3. T!iis Court, m the matter ofW.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. State "f Chhattisgarii and others) aad other connected mattsrs, directed the Cosimittee to consider the tnatter oftlie retiral dues as the disputed questioa of facte were involved. The Committee was constitoted by Ihe State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed ia W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakai- Vs. State Govenimeirt and others) a«id order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and o&ers Vs. Baijnath Mandai and aQotfaer). Thus, this petitioii is squarefy covered by the f,**asys.^ 2 judgment aad order dated 31 ef Januar^', 2008 passed in W.P. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Masida! Vs. T;ie State of Chhattisgarh a'ld otfaers) sn'd otli'sr conii^cted tiis-ttcrs^ ES subniitted bv/ tlic Iss-iiied- CQUIIS^I appeanng •fnr tl'te nai-ties 4. This petition is disposed of ia the saine tenns i.e. the office of the Advocate Geaeral is directed to sead tiis case te the Committee, \vithm a period of 15 days from fhe date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioaer alongwith a cop}' of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shal! issue notice to tlie petitioner and tlie officers conceraed, within a further psriod of 15 days. The Committee sha'! consider and pass order, in accordasce with law, after aSbrding proper oppos'ti'mty ofhearing to the petitioner. The petitiQ'ier and the ofiicers c-Qiicsnwd IH.&V flle s-ciditioiisl docuiiiQsits. if ?I€CSSSHTV. The eiitiT© exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to tfae petitioaer be completed within a pei-iod of four moiiths from the date of receipt of the file fi-om the offlce oftlie Advocate General. 5. The petitioner shal! supply extra copy ofthe petition to leamed counsel appearing for the respondents, for sending to the said committee. Sahu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge