IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 4132 of 2009 Between: B. Chandra Sekhar (Male, Hindu) S/o. B. Sivanna R/o. Nayakallu Village, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 M. The Sub Inspector of Police IV Town Police Station Kurnool. 2 C.K. Surendra Babu (Hindu, Male) S/o. C.S. Krishna Murthy R/o. H.No. 43/104, N.R. Peta, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.1 in interfering in civil dispute by calling the petitioner to the police station influenced by the 2nd respondent without there being registration of complaint and threatening petitioner that he will implicate the petitioner in false criminal case if he don't return the demanded amount shown in the legal notice sent by the 2nd respondent dated 26-08-2008 as illegal arbitrary, capricious and violation of fundamental rights of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st Respondent not to interfere in this matter which is of civil nature by calling petitioner to the police station threatening petitioner to refund sale consideration shown in the legal notice sent by the 2nd respondent dated 26-08-2008 without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI MURALI LINCOLN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.4132 of 2009 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that the 1st respondent, namely, the Sub-Inspector of Police, IV Town Police Station, under the influence of the 2nd respondent and without registration of complaint against him, is interfering in the civil dispute between him and the 2nd respondent by calling him to the police station and threatening him to refund the sale consideration amount shown in the legal notice, dated 26.08.2008, sent by the 2nd respondent. The 1st respondent filed a detailed counter affidavit, whereunder, while denying the material allegations made by the petitioner, he stated that basing on the complaint given by the 2nd respondent complaining that the wife of the petitioner, with deceitful intention to get wrongful gain, executed a registered sale deed in respect of the land admeasuring 4 acres situated in Sy.No.321 of Naralapuram village, Veldurthy Mandal with the help of the petitioner and his brother, by taking an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- suppressing the fact that a civil case is pending against the said land in the civil Court, a case in Crime No.368 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the petitioner, his wife and his brother, as Accused Nos.2,1 and 3 respectively. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that the investigation done by the 1st respondent revealed that a prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, his wife and his brother, and that, to evade arrest by the police, the petitioner approached this Court with baseless allegations. In view of the specific denials made by the 1st respondent that except registration of crime on the basis of a complaint, they have neither harassed the petitioner nor interfered in civil disputes, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, closed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA,J 17.03.2009 v v