1 HIOH OOURT OF CHHATTISOARH. BII^SBJS ;~i' W.P.(SlNo. 5123 of 2007 PETITIONER BES^MNTS 2 3 4 M.R. Pradhan, S/o Shri T.R. Pradhan, aged about ^ years, D.E.O. (EducaBon) Ramanujganj Head Quarter Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Vwvus State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education (School) De(»rtment D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Director Public Instruction Rafpur (C.G.) Agustina Xalxo Incharge of Dlstrict Educatton OfBcer, Education District Ambikapur, CNstt. Sarguja (C.G.) Collector Sarguja Ambit^xir, Didrtet Sarguja (C.G.) wrar pemioN UNDER ARTICLE 220 OF THE coNSTtruTiON OF iNbiA Appearance: Shri J.S. Baraik, counsel for (he petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondente No. 1,2& 4on adwince copy. Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel for respondent No.3 on Caveat Petihon No. 707/2007. ORAI. ORDER ^OT.WJSWTT SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. The petitioner, who is presenBy woridng as District Education Officer (D.E.O.), Ramanujganj, Head Quarter Amblkapur, Dfetrict Sarguj'a, has been tTansferred from ttie said pface Bl as a Prindpal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhaiyathan. District Sarguja on administrafive grounds (Annexure-P/3) and respondent No.3 has been brought to hls place from Govt. Giris H^her Secondary School, Manipur Ward, Ambikapur, Dfstrict Sarguja. This Is also on admfnistrative grounds. ^r W.P.(S)No. 5123 of 2007 Leamed counset for the petitioner argues that the petftioner is senior person and heis woridng as District Education OfRcer, therrfore, he should not have been transferred as Princfpal. He also argues that ttie transfer of ttie pefiBoner as Principal from the post of D.E.O. shall affect his ftiture promotion. Though he has aigued like ttiis but he could not appnse this Court regarding any such Rutes or cireutar of the Govemment, according to whfch, on such transfer, the ftiture promofion shall be affected. The transfer is an exigency of service and nobody ^osuns ^t^' posted/woridng on fransferable post can clahn for pMswg'at a particularplace. It is for the emptoyer to see as to who shoutd be posted at whfch place and untess the order of transfer is shown to be viUated by matafides or passed on extraneous considerafions or is against any statutory Rutes or the Act, ft cannot be interfered by a Court of faw, is the setUed view of ttie Apex Court. Since the leamed coimsel for tfie peGfioner could not malce out any such grounds as above and he also could notapprise thls Court that the transfer of tfie peUUoner as Principal shatl advereefy gffectsd his ftrture service and the rareer of the petitfoner, I am of ttre ofrimon that present is not a fit case to interfere witti the said onfer pissed by the Govemment on 29^.2007. The pefifion has no mertts, fte same isdlsmissed at tte mofion stage ttseff. In consequence tte Caveat Petftton No. 707/2007 stands discharged. ~—- Sd/- SiinyKumarSinha Judge vatti