0%”WKL 1 N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAspUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.‘ ‘249 a /2010 ram Panchayat Mahavirganj, Janpad Panchayat:— Ramchandarpur, (CG), through its Sarpanch Jeetan Ram Satnami, so of Shri Ram Kishun, aged 50‘years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Tahsil District é / PETITIONER District Sarguja Mahavirganj, Ramanujganj , Surguja. / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, RESPONDENTS through its Secretary, of l Department Panchayat and Rura Development, Mantralaya, D.K.'S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2 .. Collector, Sarguja, District Sarguja (C.G.) ' 3. / Chief Officer, Panchayat, Executive I Zila Sarguja, District Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Ramanujganj, District / Sarguja (C.G.) 5, Chief Executive r TWPW” WT Q4 n i ‘ Officer/ Project Officer, National Rural Employment Guarantee Yojana, Janpad Panchayat:— Ramchandarpur, District Suuj a ( . .) . S ginee, Janpad Panchayat Ramchandarpur, istrict Surguja .G.) D (C 7.‘ Shri Rampukar Yadav, Badri Prasad Yadav, age not knw t the petitioner, Caste—Aahi, ent of Ville aavirganj, Tahs aman ganj, Dric rg C. son of Shri o o , r rside ag Mh il Ruj istt Sauja (G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: 1. PAR - rg C G ‘6 ub Enr n t LIA -kbnn :v. Ha; noncn tit1L RII‘ PETITION (5) No 2193 oi 201 I I‘IONE ram Panchavat, Maavua VERs SU tae 0t Chhaxtxsgarh & Oter St hs RbsPONDENTS WRII PT] l‘ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OI' IHE CONS‘III'U'I ON OF INDI , B Pcn’hle S'iri Satish K. Agnihotr Passedm 05"daycf Ma,*201‘o ( y) e petmoner Gram Panchavat, Mahabn‘ganj 1s aggleved b the orde ated 16 4 2010 (Annexure P/l whereb the ChiefExecutive l ancavat. burguja has mformed all the Chief Execuuve Ommfl’rojec liicem (NREUA), Janpad Panchavat. Ramchandraur, vmh retete t he order dated 25 62 2010 (Annexur ssued by the tafe Government, ct appomtees have been extended u ’2802 2011 ¢Sh Sh t ,§_Ith g i o h s toresard L o 7 n nvastava, leamed counsel appeanng for the petmoner submm tha ere are senous allegatrons agamst the respondent No 7 who ls workm n te post or Gram Ojgar Sahavak. on contract basis Thu the a rders may not be glven eiiect to m respect ot respondent No : T en hrs ls not a case where the servxeee of only respondent No 7 has be S I ATISH K AGNIHOTR Judge W 0 PET R G hgnj ' ‘ E I A .‘ _, S LJ 7 w y r d ) y 0&cer Ila _ ‘Ph t : O p nce o ;t e I S ‘ \ ’ a pto