IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 74 of 2011(S) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SELVI,W/O.ANILKUMAR,THUNDUVILA VEEDU, NEAR MGM MODEL SCHOOL,AYIROOR,MUTTAPPALAM.P.O, CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE,VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695145. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.NARENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695101. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695141. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695141. 4. AMBU,S/O.INDIRA,ATTINKARA PANAYIL VEEDU, NEAR AYIROOR BRIDGE,VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695310. 5. INDIRA,ATTINKARA PANAYIL VEEDU, NEAR AYIROOR BRIDGE,VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695310. 6. SHAIJU,S/O.KOUSALYA,NADUTHALA VEEDU, CHAVADIMUKKU,MUTTAPPALAM.P.O,CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE, VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695145. 7. SHIJI,S/O.PRASANNA,KALLUVILA VEEDU, NEAR LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY,MUTTAPPALAM.P.O, CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE,VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695145. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMAPPU. R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR:NO.74 OF 2011: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF FIR NO.166 OF 2011 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION FILED BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, VARKALA ON 4.2.2011. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF REPRSENTATION DATED 15.2.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(CRL) No.74 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner is the mother of the alleged detenu. Allegation of detention is made against the 4th respondent and it is alleged that there is connivance with the 6th and 7th respondents. 2. Today the alleged detenu, the petitioner, her husband, the 4th respondent and the mother of the 4th respondent were present. We interacted with them. 3. The alleged detenu would say that she went on her own and that she has married the 4th respondent as per the Hindu customary rites on 20.2.2011. She would also say that she wants to go with the 4th respondent. Having regard to the facts we see no reason to allow further prosecution of this matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition (Criminal) is closed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS