1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9304 OF 2008. IN F.A.ST.NO.14864 OF 2005. W.C.L. through the G.M.Chandrapur. .vs. Shivdas Urkuda and others. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Coram: P.B.VARALE,J. Dated : 25th FEBRUARY, 2009. This is an application moved by the applicant for condonation of delay and setting aside the abatement. Adv.Sharma holding for Adv.Mr.Mehadia submits that the appellant/ applicant was unaware of the fact that respondent no.1 has expired during the pendency of the proceedings. He further submits that the information was collected and the administrative approval was sought for taking necessary steps. The delay occurred is unintentional and because of 2 the administrative and procedural aspects. Though notices are issued and served, none appears for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr.Thakre, A.G.P. appears for respondents no.3 and 4. In my opinion, in the interest of justice it will be appropriate to condone the delay. The delay is condoned. The application is allowed. JUDGE. chute