IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA 1.RSA. No. 78 of 2004. 2.RSA No. 79 of 2004. Date of Decision: 26.2.2013. ____________________________________________________________ 1.RSA No. 78 of 2004. Braham Dev Sood Son of Sh. Parkash Chand Sood, R/o Kandaghat, Tehsil Kandaghat, District Solan, H.P. …Appellant. Vs. Jugal Kishore Son of Shri Kishan Chand, C/o Anupam Restaurant, Kandaghat, District Solan, H.P. ….Respondent. 2. RSA No. 79 of 2004. Braham Dev Sood Son of Sh. Parkash Chand Sood, R/o Kandaghat, Tehsil Kandaghat, District Solan, H.P. …Appellant. Vs. Jugal Kishore Son of Shri Kishan Chand, C/o Anupam Restaurant, Kandaghat, District Solan, H.P. ….Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1?.No. For the appellant: Mr. K.S. Kanwar, Advocate. For respondent: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?yes. 2 Dev Darshan Sud, J(Oral). When both appeals were taken up for hearing, it was submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the suit premises have since been handed over to the landlord Sh. Braham Dev. In these circumstances, I hold that both appeals have become infructuous and disposed of as such. No finding is given on the merits of the points of law and facts of the case. 2. Submission is made on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Braham Dev that some amount of Rs. 6,000/-as arrear remains due and recoverable from the respondents. In the changed circumstances, I do not deem it necessary to go into this fact. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. February 26,2013(R)