1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2010 Navnath Rangnath Palwe, and another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT Mr.P.R.Nangare, learned counsel for applicants. Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, learned APP for respondent State. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 27/01/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present application, the applicants have approached this Court for his release on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.I-352/2009, registered in Pathardi Police station for the alleged offence punishable u/s. 143, 147, 148, 149, 326, 323, 504, 506 and u/s.37(1)(3) of The B.P. Act. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicants followed by the submissions of learned APP for State. Also perused the papers of investigation till carried out. It is tried to urge across the bar that the crime lodged in Pathardi Police Station in which these applicants are seeking bail, is the crime lodged to give a counter blast to the 2 Crime registered at the instance of present applicant. 3. Perusal of the papers of investigation as well as the FIR in both these offences, it appears that the crime registered in which the applicants are seeking bail, is about the alleged incident took place at the residential place of the complainant on 27/12/2009 at about 6.00 a.m. As against this, the offence was registered at the instance of present applicants about the assault on their father. That incident took place on the same day, but after one hour of the earlier incident i.e. at about 7.00 a.m., and in front of Maruti Temple. Both these incidents occurred in broad day light. There can not be any mistaken identity of the assailants whose names are arrayed in the complaint. As the offence registered in which present application is moved is earlier in point of time, no chances of false implication of present applicants. In the premise, application sans any merit, rejected. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JAN 2010/cri-appl-186-10