IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.2083 OF 2004 Shilpa Salunkhe & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. The Education Inspector & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. R. S. Apte i/b. Mr. A. A. Garge for the Petitioners. Mr. P. M. Mokashi, AGP for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 10, 2004. P.C.: We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the State Government fairly submits that in case a comprehensive representation is made to the Government, the same would be considered favourably by Respondent No.1 within two months from today. According to the Petitioners, if one Junior Clerk is promoted as a Senior Clerk, in that event, one post of a Junior Clerk will become available. Petitioner No.1 has been working for 8 years satisfactorily, she would be considered for that post from the date of the dismissal of the appeal of Mr.Kelkar by the School Tribunal i.e. 30th September 2003. Since that is the sanctioned post, the question of Government ban on new recruitment would not come in the way of the Government taking decision of filling up the post of Petitioner No.1 who is working there for 8 years. In this view of the matter, the petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.