Civil Revision No.4371 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-29.7.2010 Kaka Singh son of Waryam Singh ...Petitioner Versus Amrit Pal Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.Harpreet S.Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioner. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) The epitome of facts, relevant for disposal of present petition and emanating from the record, is that in the wake of Civil Revision No.2974 of 2009, the suit of the petitioner-plaintiff was ordered to be restored to its original number by this court, vide order dated 16.11.2009 (Annexure P1), the operative part of which is as under:- “For the reasons recorded above, the revision petition is accepted. The orders impugned, are set aside, subject to payment of costs of Rs.50,000/- to the contesting defendant/respondents, which shall be a condition precedent. The suit, is ordered to be restored, at its original number. It is made clear that the suit being old, as and when the witnesses are produced and examined in chief, by way of affidavit, and copy of the same is supplied, in advance, no adjournment shall be granted by the court, for their cross-examination, by the plaintiff or his counsel. The parties through their counsels, are directed to appear, in the trial court on 7.12.2009 at 10.00 A.M./sharp for further proceedings.” 2. Instead of depositing the costs, the petitioner-plaintiff moved an application for extension of time to deposit the same on the ground of his illness. Civil Revision No.4371 of 2010 2 The said application was dismissed, mainly on the ground that the time granted by the High Court cannot be extended by the trial Court, vide impugned order dated 7.12.2009 (Annexure P3). 3. The petitioner-plaintiff did not feel satisfied with the order (Annexure P3) and filed the present petition. 4. During the course of hearing of this petition, petitioner-plaintiff was directed to deposit the amount of Rs.50,000/- (costs) in the trial Court and ultimately, the case was adjourned for today. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff has stated at the bar that the plaintiff has already deposited the amount of costs of Rs.50,000/- in pursuance of order of this Court, vide treasury challan dated 27.7.2010. He also produced the photo copy of challan (Annexure A1). 5. In this view of the matter, as the petitioner-plaintiff has already deposited the amount of costs of Rs.50,000/-, therefore, the trial Court is directed to restore his suit at its original number and to decide the same as per the direction contained in the order (Annexure P1) passed in CR No.2974 of 2009 in accordance with law. Petitioner-plaintiff through his counsel is directed to appear before the trial Court on 17.8.2010. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) 29.7.2010 Judge AS