IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.49 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR MISHRA, SON OF LATE ANAND MISHRA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BHAGWANPUR PARKI, P.S. – LALGANJ, DISTRICT – VAISHALI. …………………………… PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………….. OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 03 16.04.2010 Hear the parties. This petition is directed against the order dated 20.09.2007 passed by the SDJM, Biharsharif, Nalanda in Case No. 582 (C) / 2003 by which the charge has been amended and a new charge under Section 494 IPC has been framed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier charge was framed. It has further been submitted that the victim wife has died and she had in her deposition stated about the second marriage. However in the impugned order it is mentioned that P.W. 4 has stated in his evidence about the second marriage during the life time of the first wife. However, the charge can be framed even of grave suspicion if there is material on record to suggest that the second marriage was during the life time of the deceased. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, this Court does not find any merit to interfere with the impugned order and hence, the petition is dismissed. Kundan ( Gopal Prasad, J.)