-M^ ^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition (S) NO.^VM 72011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 0% ^f^ ^;^"0^' <^y~ .?••' /" 'o-"^-:: Meera Sahu, W/o Dr. Ramlal Sahu, aged about 47 years, R/o Behind Dargean Showroom, Near Santoshi Mandir, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate of Public Instoructions, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Joint Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, District Raipur (C.G.) y' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVIohan Shrivastava, J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0.2714/2011 Meera Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF !NDIA Present: - Shri Ravi Kumar Bhagat, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13th oflVlay, 2011) The petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay. After completion of her probation period, she was granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the.case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. 3ttM-IS'» :rif'1'^:^'3fciM '??5^%;3§*S' ^'^^ •^ssss •:'^as^ •'••^fj^^ iSSisSE ii^W'Sfe? A^'S"''& /•^^ \ •,e''?.^&.-i. vs :;^;?>3E®S'^^! ^ ^, '•''.••-.-.^.^.i?'' ..ifc'" 4. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider their case, if they stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-08-1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745 of 89 Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03-01-1994 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.6892/1993 and grant relief accordingly. 5. No order as to costs. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ?i;:^^:ftS^a "ss^^s ^^^^ 'ssssy %^i^B .•^!s^:Sff! Tumane '^^ii^;