i BES®-fflBiB.BISH_COSgI_©g_CSS»N££AgH_AS.glASPUR^ W.P. 2-S^- 2Q06 Otsher Wstter. ,• ^ ,./^/ M/ .s>'/'F/-i .--"' '^/^/ /-^•^/ c"^ <s'^ <<'~-{>. •^t' cf T^\**' ^ /;? '?"' ^•y |1^'2.S.US3\^| ^ ; r-^?T^rt'/ g •• \ K-VSV. t,.l le..' °"'"* /^J %.. _ ~ -"-^/ SA:.s-l&y ^^•^^^^sr^ 3-CO?t ZtC^I^^\^ ^^.^s^ CLSR<- to R..G s 1. Rakesh EigarsaBia aged aboi.rt; 57 years» S/o late Bandas ilffarsanla. 2. Smt. Ksha Ilparsania aged about 59 years* K/o Stol Rateesfa ^lparsaaia. 3. Br. Vivek Blparsaiaa aged abeafc 3! years» S/o Stssi aakesh ^i.Parsaala. 4, Br. Bhawaa sugta aged about; 29 years» W/o Br. Kainal Nai«yan supta. All residents of s auarter No. 84/2,Street 6A mitrl Bagar* 'Polles .St;a-feion-N8val Bbllal Nagar lah. &Mstt. B8RG (e.G.). ^jSBSUS t. State CK£ Bttar Pradesh Ihrough - supit.oi Police •Thaasi, Bistt.Jlaaasi (U.P.). 2« State o,£ ehhattisgarh •Ebrough ;- supdt.of PoUee Bua?g* lah. & Mstt.Burg (03). 3. Sfcatloa Heugs Otfieer PoU.ee Statlon - SiPrl Bazar Sub Dlsfcrict - Jhansl Bistrl.c-fc Jtaaasi (U.P.). contd....;2 ^-y^- I s s: 2 is ""-^^, --^.. '^ 'N^C-',^?, s'-^ /» s ^»^\'"sy-a fi> / a. s. 'AS" vl<"'.% 9':K" i ".-w^'.' . 1 *g M^ \ Eni«»%W.&-' j .^»? ///^°i?l . \ " ^ftA / e^ ff -^,..^^-'" ^.\-/. ^B;;€ S;lB.,i'Sp; ^^;^;.£S?S"ai'-^ 4. Br. O.P. gupta ^ Setirad Medleal A-l Awas Tttkas» NandaRgura. P.S. SiPri Bazar Dlstrlct Jhansi (U.P.). 5. Br. SWabyL GuPfea ^- ' agsd aboufc 30 yaax-s* W/o Br. Vlvek SuBta Bhopal. Heaorial Boapltal & aeseareb Ceater Aaeasthesla Bepartne&1;» Raige Byegass Road, Hear Karaod ctauhara Bfaaapur» Bistt. Btopal58 (M.P.). B/e A-l Awas Vlkas Nandangura P.S. SLPri Bazar* Dis'fcriet Jtensi (U.P.). PE'nsiOI UNBBR AKCICISS 226/227 CP THE C!<»ISI3:'!!BlriCN XNBIA. •-1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition No. 254 of2006 RESPONDENTS 1. Rakesh Piparsania, aged about 57 years, S/o late Ramdas Piparsania. 2. Smt. Usha Piparsania, aged about 55 years, W/o Shri Rakesh Piparsania. 3. Dr. Vivek Piparsania, aged about 31 years, S/o Shri Rakesh Piparsania. 4. Dr. Bhawna Gupta, aged about 29 years, W/o Dr. Kamal Narayan Gupta. A!l residents of'Quarter No. 84/2, Street 6A Maitri Nagar, Police Station Nevai Bhilai Nagar, Tah. & DistL Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. State ofUttar Pradesh through Supdt. ofPolice Jhansi, Distt. Jhansi (UP). 2. State of Chhattisgarh through Supdt. of Police E>urg, Tah.&Distt.Durg(CG). 3. Station House Ofticer Police Station Sipri Bazar Sub District Jhansi District Jhansi (UP). 4. Dr. O.P. Gupta, Retired Medical Qflicer, Nandanpura, P.S. Sipri Bazar District Jhansi (UP). 5. Dr. Surabhi Gupta, aged about 30 years, W/o Dr. Vivek Gupta Bhopal Memorial Hospital & Reseai-ch Centre Aneusfhesia Departmeat, Raise Byepass Road, Near Karaod Chauhara Bhanpur, Distt. Bhopal 38 (MP) R/o A-l Awas Vikas Nandanpura. P.S. Sipri Bazar, District Jhansi (UP). (WRIT PETITION LTMDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITLmON OF INDIA) (SB: ilon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Aoiihotri, J.) Present : Shn V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioners. S'liri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate GeaeraS for the State. Shri Sunii Otwani, Advocate for the respondent No. 3, 5 & 6. _.l,___ .-£ 1|B- A, 2 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 3 dayofFebsTaary, 2009) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up tbr heanug tmally. 1. The petitioner, by this petition, seeks quashine of F.I.R. registered as Crime No. 1881/5 on 10.11.2005 wiffa Police Station Sipri Bazar, District Jtaansi (UP). 2. The petitioner has filed a petition being Criminal Mise. Writ Petition No, 12962/2005 (Rakesh Piparsania and Others Vs. State ofU.P. and Ottiers) before the High Comt of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking a reliefttiat the petitioner should not be an-ested in Crime No. 1881/05, registered aeainst him in Police Station Sipri Bazar, District Jhansi (UP). The same was disposed ofon 21.12.2005. 3. Since the case was reeistered at Police Station Sipri Bazar, District Jhansi (UP), this court has no jurisdiction to quash the FIR as stated above. The territorial jurisdiction offhe case is within High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, where the petitioner has also filed some petitions. arising fi-om the same crime. 4. . In view ofthe foiegomg, this petition is not maintainable and as such, is dismissed. No order asto costs. 5. Consequeatly, M(W)P No. 221/06, stands disposed of. Sdf- S.K. Agnihotri Judge ."~^, ':A8h«w—"~ ^"^"ra^s^'^^'SE