(1) CA. 2992.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2992 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 578 OF 1991 Ganpat S/o Eknathrao Narwade .. Applicant VERSUS Babu s/o Vishwanath Sakhare died through LRs. and others .. Respondents Mr. K.K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. V.C. Solshe, Advocate h/f. Mr. C.G. Solshe, Advocate for the respondents ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2010 P.C.:- 1] Heard both the counsel extensively. The controversial facts are addressed by both of them. Notice purportedly issued by the Municipal Council, Tuljapur on 30.1.2010 addressed to the respondent Bhimashankar is produced by Mr. Kulkarni. Mr. Solshe submits that whatever construction is undertaken by the appellant in the second appeal, is exclusively in his own property, it has nothing to do with the order in challenge. That apart, injunction is in respect of the southern side while the notice of Municipal Council dated 30.1.2010 specifically refers to the western side window purportedly raised by the appellant. (2) CA. 2992.2010 2] At this stage of the matter, if the direction of the window of 3' X 3' is apparently seen by the authorities of the Municipal Council and if it is in breach of the municipal rules, liberty to the Municipal Council to take legal recourse. At this stage, no case for grant of injunction as prayed for in the Second Appeal, is made out. The Application stands disposed of. Sd/- (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) arp