IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 30 OF 1997 Villar Builders Pvt Ltd. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Central Bank of India ..Defendants Ms. S. Vedpathak i/b M/s. Maneksha & Sethna for the Plaintiffs Mr. P. G. Kinikar i/b N.C. Dalal & Co. for Defendant No.1 Ms. Sheela Mistry i/b Mr. Jayesh Patel for Defendant Nos.2(a) to 2(e), 3 & 4 CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: 27th AUGUST, 2009 P.C. : Consent Terms have been arrived at in the suit between the Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos. 2A to 2C and Defendant Nos. 3 and 4. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as ‘X’. The Consent Terms have been signed by the parties and by their respective Advocates. Counsel appearing on behalf of Defendant No.1 states that, his client, Central Bank of India, is a formal party to the suit and that he has no objection to the Consent Terms being taken on record and the suit being disposed of in terms on the Consent Terms, subject, however, to the payment of costs to Defendant No.1. Since the dispute has been settled between the signatories to the Consent Terms, there shall be a decree in terms thereof as between the parties to the Consent Terms. The Plaintiff shall pay costs to Defendant No.1. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)