THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4018 OF 2010 AND 4045 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: C.R.P.No.4018 of 2010, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 09.06.2010, in I.A.No.205 of 2010 in O.S.No.40 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Karimnagar, whereunder and whereby, the petition, under Order VII Rule 14 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (for short, “C.P.C.”) filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs seeking to receive the certified copy of correction of Mutation Register for the year 2009 – 2010, was dismissed. 2. C.R.P.No.4045 of 2010, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 09.06.2010, in I.A.No.122 of 2010 in I.A.No.1344 of 2009 in O.S.No.40 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Karimnagar, whereunder and whereby, the petition, under Order VII Rule 14 C.P.C., filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs to receive the documents mentioned therein in their favour in the injunction petition, was partly allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the trial Court ought to have received the document subject to proof and relevancy in view of the fact that the document was obtained from the competent authority and therefore, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents contended that the mutation was effected in pursuance of the interim order, dated 02.12.2009, in W.P.No.26195 of 2009 passed by this Court and later this Court disposed of the Writ Petition with an observation not to take advantage of the mutation proceedings and therefore, that cannot be relied upon. 5. It is not in dispute before this Court that in pursuance of the interim order granted by this Court in W.P.No.26195 of 2009, the concerned Tahsildhar effected mutation. Thereafter, the Writ Petition was disposed of by order, dated 09.07.2010, wherein it is held that the petitioners are enjoined not to take advantage of the entries so made and await the decision in the civil proceedings with regard to the declaration of their rights. It is also further held that in such view of the matter, not withstanding the mutation directed by the Tahsildhar, Karimnagar, in his proceedings dated 03.02.2010, the same would necessarily be subject to the decision in the civil proceedings initiated by the petitioners through O.S.No.40 of 2009. This would of course be limited only to the extent of Ac.0.23 guntas claimed by respondent No.4 on the basis of the alienations said to have been made by the petitioners' father in the year 1998. So, in view of the fact that the petitioners cannot take advantage of the mutation proceedings in pursuance of the interim order, dated 02.12.2009, passed by this Court in W.P.No.26195 of 2009, there are no grounds to receive the certified copy of correction in the Mutation Register for the year 2009 – 2010. That is the reason why the trial Court rightly dismissed the petition. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J September 28, 2010 MD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4018 OF 2010 AND 4045 OF 2010 C.R.P.No.4018 OF 2010: Between: Pendyala Laxma Reddy and others .....PETITIONERS AND Malyala Laxmi and others ....RESPONDENTS C.R.P.No.4045 OF 2010: Between: Pendyala Laxma Reddy and others .....PETITIONERS AND Malyala Laxmi and others ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4018 OF 2010 AND 4045 OF 2010 September 28, 2010