1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4558/2007 (Shriram Kamalanarayan Choursai VERSUS The Municipal Council, Gondia thro. its Chief Officer & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Borkar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Meshram, counsel for the R-1. Mr. Mehadia, counsel for the R-2 and 3. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 13, 2008. Heard. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the instant petition, the basic grievance of the petitioner is against the impugned order/communication dated 04.05.2007 whereby the permission is granted to respondent nos.2 and 3 for additional construction of the building in question which is used for hospital, maternity home, nursing home, etc. The counsel for the Municipal Council, Gondia has submitted that at a later point of time, the Municipal Council has granted sanction to the revised plan submitted by respondent no.2 vide order dated 04.10.2007. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, particularly in view of the subsequent order 2 passed by the Municipal Council, Gondia, we do not propose to show any indulgence in the present writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of. However, it is open for the petitioner, if otherwise permissible in law, to approach the concerned authorities for redressal of grievance, if the subsequent communication of the Municipal Council, Gondia is inconsistent with the building by-laws. JUDGE JUDGE APTE