IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1916 of 2010 SRAWAN KUMAR & ORS. Versus RAM CHANDRA MAHTO & ORS. ----------- 5. 05.01.2011 1. I.A. No. 10663 of 2010 has been filed by the petitioner for addition of Ram Chandra Mahto as Opposite Party No. 1 after deleting the name of original Respondent no. 1 Deokalia Devi. Considering the facts and circumstances, interlocutory application is allowed. Let the name of Ram Chandra Mahto be substituted in place of Deokalia Devi as Opposite Party No. 1. 2. This M.J.C. petition has been filed for restoration of S.A. No. 274 of 2000 , which stood dismissed for default due to non-compliance of peremptory order of this court dated 15.12.2008 by which while admitting the second appeal, notices were directed to be sent to the non-appearing respondents. 3. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented the petitioners from complying the said peremptory order within time. 4. Accordingly, this M.J.C. petition is allowed and S.A. No. 274 of 2000 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to compliance of the said order dated 15.12.2008 within one week by way of filing fresh notices. Sujit (S.N. Hussain, J.)