IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11462 of 2008 Decided on: 24.12.2010 Dr. Neelam Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondents No. 3 and 4. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner as and when the vacancy becomes available in any of the projects after taking into consideration that the petitioner had worked for more than five years in Development of Herbal Pharmacopial Standards of ISM Drugs. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 24, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?