lpast2199.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 864 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 2199 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mr. K.S. Bhore, adv. for applicant. Mr. P.P. More, AGP for respondents. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 3 rd FEBRUARY, 2011. 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGP for respondent. 2 In this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of 17 days delay caused in filing the appeal. 3 We have perused the civil application. For the reasons stated in the application, it is made absolute in terms of lpast2199.11 2 prayer clause 'B'. Civil application is disposed of. ( R.M. BORDE) ( D.B. BHOSALE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb lpast2199.11 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 2199 OF 2011 Pandurang Suryabhan Landge .. APPELLANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. K.S. Bhore, advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.P. More, AGP for the respondents. ===== CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 3 rd FEBRUARY, 2011 PER COURT : 1 This appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 7th December, 2010, in Writ Petition no. 11009/2010, disposing it of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority. The petition was filed challenging the final voters' list. lpast2199.11 4 This court while disposing of the petition passed the following order :- . Heard Mr. K.S. Bhore, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.R. Korde, learned A.G.P. for the respondents. . Mr. Bhore, learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset, fairly submits that on 30.11.2010 final voters list is published and the petitioner has alternate remedy under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. . In this view of the matter, petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority. 2 From perusal of the order, it is clear that the writ petition was not pressed on merits and liberty was sought to take alternate remedy under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. In view thereof, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Dismissal of the appeal, however, as observed in the impugned order, would not preclude the appellant from taking remedy under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. All contentions of the parties are kept open to be raised in the dispute, which appellant proposes to institute, after result of the election is declared. lpast2199.11 5 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( D.B. BHOSALE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb