1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 297 OF 1991 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court s or Judge s orders. ’ ’ or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 9 th June, 2009. ... 1) Counsel called absent. The concurrent findings recorded against the defendant in a suit for specific performance of contract decided by CJJD, Sillod on 19 th August, 1986 while the Judgment passed by IIIrd Additional District Judge, Aurangabad dated 25 th July, 1989 is subject of challenge in the Second Appeal. 2) On 22.8.1991 the appeal is admitted on the ground whether courts below has jurisdiction to decree the prayer for specific performance without considering the provisions of Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, treating as substantial question of law. There was no written statement on behalf of the defendant. His prayer 2 for remand was turned down by the learned District Judge by recording reasons. The plaintiff and his witnesses were cross examined by the defendant without pleading. Second Appeal dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE **** bdv/office/sas297.91