WP(C) 4324/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Mr. R. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction, seek s to withdraw the writ petition opposing which Mr. Chokraborty, learned CGC subm its that there being suppression of material fact on the part of the petitioner, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on that score alone. Learned CGC su bmits that the petitioner projected his dismissal from service pursuant to his u nauthorised absence from duty which is falsification of truth. He submits that i n fact, the petitioner was dismissed from service due to furnishing of fake matr iculation certificate at the time of his recruitment. As regards to unauthorised absence from duty, he submits that although another departmental enquiry was in itiated, but in view of dismissal from service on the ground of furnishing fake matriculation certificate, the said departmental proceeding was not pursued. He also submits that the petitioner duly participated in the departmental proceedin g in respect of furnishing fake matriculation certificate. For all the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file a fresh writ petition on fresh cause of action. The prayer is allowed, subject, however, to the aforesaid fact situation .