1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31248 of 2011 Teju Singh S/o Girija Singh, R/o Village- Nagpur, P.S. Rajpur, District-Buxar. --Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party 3 21.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this case instituted on the basis of Complaint Case no. 1041 of 2010 filed on 15.9.2010 as the person with whom missing daughter of the complainant informant was seen at Buxar railway station, four months after her reported missing. Submission is that petitioner has been implicated in this case due to some other dispdute and there is none, in fact, to see the victim with petitioner. Moreover, there is no explanation for the delay of four months in informing the authorities about missing of the daughter of the informant. Investigation is still going on. Girl is yet to be traced out. Further 2 there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner. If it is so, till conclusion of investigation / submission of charge sheet, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in Rajpur P.S. Case no. 140 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below till conclusion of investigation / submission of charge sheet. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)