WP(C) 1357/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY To respond to the query posed by the Court on 9th March, 2011 on the maintainabi lity of the writ petition, Mr. Y S Mannan, learned counsel submits that although the petitioner is discharging service in the Higher Secondary section of Pakada li High School which is yet to be provincialised, as his discharge is going to a ffect the students in the Higher Secondary section, the intervention by the Writ Court should be made. However the learned counsel is unable to distinguish the school in which the petitioner is serving, from the private school which was und er consideration of the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.227/2010 (Ali Haidar vs . State of Assam). The School before the Division Bench was also recognized by the State Government and yet the Court held that it does not convert the school into a ’State’ or an authority and invoking the writ jurisdiction was held to be unjustified by the Division Bench. Since the Higher Secondary section of Pakadali High School is a privately manage d School, having regard to the decision of the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 227/2010, I am disinclined to exercise the writ jurisdiction to examine a decisi on taken by a private body i.e. the Managing Committee of a venture school. In view of above, this case is held to be not maintainable. The dismissal of the writ petition shall not obliterate the right of the petitio ner to approach the Civil Court for appropriate remedy, if so advised.