IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38732 of 2010 RAMBALI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In a case of road robbery, petitioner’s name appeared in course of investigation as his mobile was used for commitment of the offence is doubted on the ground that the same was missed and was informed to the concerned Police Station may be the reality but in the cases of road robbery, several materials are expected to be revealed including confession leading to recovery and identification. One of the culprits is identified in T.I. parade in the case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)