/a? & ^•\° o IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 13 LS /2Q04 PETITIONER -AS$^ ^>^K •^"^"'^7'' <^\^^-"1 _<>-.^ .-•' ^.^'..••- ^^'" ' if:'" RESPONDENTS •'Ram Singh Satnami, S/o. Ledu Satnami, Aged about 51 years, Occupation - Ex-Service Man, R/o. Ameradih, P.0. Pihrid, Tahsil-Shakti, District ]anjgir (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Sl: Ministry Public Work Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Engineer, Public Depari:ment Bilaspur (C.G.). Work Superintendent Engineer, Public Work Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) Executive Engineer, Public Work Department, Champa Division, District ]anjgir (C.G.) Sub Engineer, Public Work Department, Sub Division Office No. l,Shakti, District ]anjgir (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer; Public Work Department, Shakti Sub Division, District ]anjgir (C.G.) Easas.i-'.u'uiuui^— ^- WR1T PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTlTUTiON OF IND1A ^ ti.fe^l HLGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATISOARH : BILASPUR SLnaL^Bench_: Satish K. Aqnihotri, J WRIT PETITION N0. 193 of 2004 Ved Ram and another Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION N0. 1918 of 2004 Ram Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETIT10N N0.1921 of 2004 Joyedha Ram Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION N0. 1928 of 2004 Sadhu Ram and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION N0. 3334 of 2004 Chhat Ram Patle Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION N0. 4217 of 2004 Deonarayan and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others. J^_ Present : Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukta, Mr. F.S.Khare and Mr. Kamal Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Koshy, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyers for the State ofChhattisgarh. ORDER (Passed on 20th September 2005) The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are working as permanent Gangmen in the Public Works Department of the State Government. Accordingly, this batch of writ petitions is being disposed of by a common order. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present petitions are squarely covered by the order passed by this Court on 15.09.2005 in Writ Petition No. 93 of 2005 and other connected matters. Mr. Koshy, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State agree with the submission ofthe petitioners. Accordingly, this batah of writ petitions stand allowed in terms of order dated 15.09.2005 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 93 of 2005 and other connected matters. __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge