1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:20.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN WP(MD)No.3832 of 2011 M.Mahendran :Petitioner -Vs- The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Kottam, Puravalisalai, Madurai. :Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to implement the order passed by the Labour Court, Madurai in I.D.No.8/1993 dated 13.11.2008 in accordance with law. For Petitioner:Mr.M.Subash Babu For Respondent:Mr.S.Baskaran ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final final disposal. 2.The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to implement the order passed by the Labour Court, Madurai in I.D.No.8/1993 dated 13.11.2008 in accordance with law. 3.The case of the petitioner is that he was working as a driver under the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. On 30.04.1990, a criminal case was registered against him and he was remanded. Hence, the petitioner could not attend the duty from 30.04.1990 to 16.07.1990. The petitioner therefore approached the respondent and explained the position . However, without giving any opportunity, he was dismissed from service. Challenging the same, he moved the Labour Court, Madurai, by way of an industrial dispute in I.D.No.8/1993. The Labour Court allowed the said I.D.No.8/1993 and directed the respondent to reinstate him in service. The petitioner approached the respondent with the said order passed by the Labour Court and requested the respondent to provide him employment. However, his case was not considered. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court for the relief stated supra. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.On notice, the learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that challenging the order of the Labour Court, no Writ Petition was filed before this Court. That apart, he submits that the case of the petitioner is pending approval before the Board and as and when, the Board passes an order in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner will be reinstated in service forthwith. 5.Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondent and also taking into account that the Labour Court directed the respondent to reinstate the petitioner, I direct the respondent to pass appropriate orders reinstating the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA) / TRUE COPY / Assistant Registrar To: The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Kottam, Puravalisalai, Madurai. +1CC to Mr.M.Subash Babu, Advocate. SR.No.14552. +1CC to Mr.S.Baskaran, Advocate. SR.No.14724. Ssm RP/02.05.2011/2P/4C. WP(MD)No.3832 of 2011 20.04.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/