1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 631 OF 2009 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 325 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 533 OF 2008 M/s. Lissome Cosmetics Pvt.Ltd. ... Plaintiffs. Vs. Mr. Sunil Jose ... Defendant. Mr. Mukundan R. Nair for the Plaintiffs. Mr.Thomas i/by M/s. C.K.Thomas & Associates for the defendant. CORAM : A.A.SAYED, J. DATE : JUNE 16, 2009. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs states that the copy of the cheque which was dishonoured is required to be annexed to the plaint, as set out in Schedule-I to the Chamber Summons. The averments in respect of the cheque are made in paragraph No. 8 of the plaint. The learned Counsel states that the cheque was inadvertently not annexed to the plaint at the time of filing of the suit. 2 2. The defendants have filed reply opposing the Chamber Summons, essentially on the ground that the amendment is only an after thought and it is not necessary to carry out any amendments to the plaint. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, I am inclined to allow the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendants, within two weeks from the date of this order. Payment of costs would be the condition precedent. 4. Amendment to be carried out within three weeks from today. Amended copy of the plaint be served upon the defendants within two weeks thereafter. 5. The Chamber Summons to stand disposed of. [A.A.SAYED, J.]