‘HE‘ HON'BLEPHIGH‘COURT ‘o‘E BISPU .P.(.5) No. §$ [201 HRH HATFISGA Sonber S/o. Shr eeraal nber, aged about 5 her, Govt. Higher econdar Sfchool'Khartuli, R/o. atnabandhaj; ‘Kotwar ,Ga, os oharsi, DistrE-ict‘Dhamtari (c.G. Nm Rm e‘u a yea s, r VERSS U *w tat of Ch‘hattisarh Se , hrough the Secretary, Ministr f Education, D.K.S. Bhawa aipur (C.G.= V Issir nstruction, Raipur (C.G.)‘ , he District Education Officer “rir, v-D‘ist’itt Dhamtar T , % k i CLE,:¥2''26T OF‘ITH’E: «CONSTITUTIO OF, WRIT OR ‘MANDAMU T Lc AT LAR‘ w 0 l i Hl SO 0 Teac Sy i R li Pt L ) /11., T y o n, rR )‘ The one, PUbIic I ‘I N: »E S' SB: ‘Hon’ble Shri Manin’dra ohan shrivastava . 031532010 ‘ Shri Somkant Verma, tmsel fogr the petitionm“. Shri A.V. Shiidhar, P el Lawyfer‘ for the State/ respondents on advance copy. Grievance of the petiii ner as setout in the petition is that while issuing the impugned rder of transfer dated 13.9.2OQ9, the po1icy of rationalization prov ding that the transfer shall be made by the Janpad Level Commi ee has been violated and impugned order has been passed by e District Education onicer, who is incompetent to exercise the p wer. Learned counsel for th petitioner made statement at the Bar that even thigh the order of sfer was issued on 13th September, 2009, petitioner has been all wed to continue at his present place of posh‘ng and enect of the transfer order has not been implemented. In this View of the ma er, interest of justice would be served in directing the responden No.2 to consider the case of the petiu'oner and pass necess orders in accordance with the policy; of rationali7ation (Annexure as expeditiously as possible. Petition is accordingly J o