IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO. 1312 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 231 OF 2008 SHRI PRATAPSINGH RAOJI RANE, SANQUELIM-GOA. ... Appellant Versus SHRI UMAKANT D. DUBHASHI AND 8 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. Vehidulla, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the respondent No.3,4,5B,5C,5D, 6 and 8. Mr. V. Menezes, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 20th January, 2009 P.C. This application has been filed for substitution of L.Rs. of respondent No.5(a). It is stated that the respondent No.5(a) is expired and all heirs i.e. respondent Nos.5(b), 5(c) and 5(d) are already on record. In view of the fact that they are already on record, there is no need to substitute them as L.Rs. of the respondent No.5(a). However, if the applicant wants to carry out such amendment, their names be added once again as L.Rs. of the respondent No.5(a). C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA