1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5492 OF 2010. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation -: VERSUS :- Surendra Shantilal Dave and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2010. Heard Shri J.B. Kasat, learned Counsel for Petitioner. Trial Court has permitted petitioner to be impleaded as party, as project is under its supervision and control, but, then as the suit is of the year 1998 and application has been moved belatedly compensated respondent no.1/plaintiff with costs of Rs. 10,000/-. Shri Kasat, learned Counsel contends that there is no provisions for imposing costs under Order 1 Rule 10 of Civil Procedure Code. He further states that on earlier occasion request was opposed when petitioner wanted to intervene in the matter. He is relying upon the judgment 2 reported at (2009) 2 SCC 656 (Ashok Kumar Mittal .vrs. Ramkumat Gupta and another) to show that there are no inherent powers in such matters. Perusal of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court shows that there the costs were imposed in altogether different circumstances and were made payable to Legal Services Sub-committee. This practice being followed has been commented by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Here it appears that since 2007 the petitioners are aware and have not taken appropriate steps. The application moved by them on 13.04.2010 has been allowed. Though costs are leveled on higher side, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.