IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.13841 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: August 31, 2006 S.S.Kanwar ….Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA PRESENT: Shri Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the facts noticed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in para 8 of the impugned order dated October 10,2005 are incorrect, inasmuch as, the petitioner had duly furnished requisite certificate and he had produced a copy of the aforesaid certificate on the record of the Tribunal. If that be so, the petitioner should first approach the Tribunal by seeking review of the order dated October 10,2005. Present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Viney Mittal) Judge August 31,2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge