1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5052 OF 2009. ( Bakaram Deorao Ramteke -: versus :- Chintaman Dayaram Shende ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 21, 2009. Heard Shri N.R. Saboo, learned counsel for petitioner. Petitioner/defendant contended that transaction was money lending transaction and his signature was obtained on blank stamp paper of Rs.10/- by respondent / plaintiff. He wanted to amend the figure of ‘Rs.10/-” to “Rs. 100/-” by pleading a typographical error. Respondent / plaintiff who was denying any such money lending transaction or signature on blank stamp paper contended that, it prejudicially affected the right accrued in his favour and it was not typographical error, as pleaded. Court below has after hearing the parties rejected the application under Order VI Rule 17 of C.P.C., moved by the petitioner/defendant. In the background in which the order has been passed and for reasons recorded therein, it is difficult to hold 2 at this stage that it was typographical error. Petitioner / defendant could have taken appropriate steps in this respect. No case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.