IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15840 of 2009 1. BEYAS BHAGAT 2. Ram Raj Bhagat 3. Surya Deo Bhagat 4. Dharmaraj Bhagat 5. Ramesh Bhagat 6. Umesh Bhagat 7. Arun Bhagat 8. Raju Bhagat 9. Mahendra Bhagat Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 03.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Land dispute, as submitted by the learned counsel, is the reason behind the differences in between the parties but there is clear assertion in the complaint petition regarding abusing in the name of caste of the complainant to humiliate her. Finding the case under Section S.C. and S.T. (prevention of atrocities) Act, it is held that the anticipatory bail of the petitioners is not maintainable. Hence, the prayer of the petitioners is rejected. However, falsity of the allegation and land dispute in between the parties shall be considered by the Court below, if petitioners appear and submit the same without being prejudiced by the rejection order. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)