IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 695 of 2002 (M/B) 1. Tushar Kant S/o Sri Dhanila Khandelwal 2. Smt. Kusam Lata Khandelwal, W/o Tushar Kant, Both through Their General Attorney Dhanilal Khandelwal, S/o Late Brijlal, R/o Railway Bazar, Haldwani, District Nainital.. 3. Shri Dhanilal Khandelwal S/o Late Brijlal, R/o Railway Bazar, Distt. Nainital ……. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Collector Nainital. 2. Controlling Authority Regulated Area, District Nainital. 3. Prescribed Authority/ City Magistrate, Haldwani, District Nainital. ……. Respondents. None for the petitioners. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J, RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J,) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 16.05.2006 16.05.2006 A