FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Beed Criminal Application No. 4065 of 2010 (Prabha w/o. Padmakarrao Kulkarni Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Through Deputy Executive Engineer, Mr. Reddy B.R., MSEDCL., Flying Sqaud, Beed) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................. Mr. G.K. Naik Thigle, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. S.M. Godsay, Advocate, for the respondent. ............................................................................. CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 17TH JUNE 2011 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 460 days caused in filing Criminal Appeal challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, dated 18-5-2009, rendered by the learned Special Judge, Beed, in Special Case No.42/2006. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 4. For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, the said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate or intentional and, therefore, the same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5. In the result, Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and delay of 460 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal stands condoned. Present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE bgp/ka4065