g M? (3%“ QM?! "” M, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$HGARH AT BILASPUR First Appeal hQ :720Q8 ) “ife Insurance Corporation of India, Through Manager (L & HPF) Divisional Office at "Jeevan Prakash" Jeevan Beema Marg Pandari, Raipur (CG) Appellant] Plaintiff Versus LwMathew Kutti Mathai @ K Mathai Mathew S/O K Mathai Kutti, Resident of E-63 Shailendra Nagar , Raipur (C.G.) Anupam Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, A Housing Society Registered under provisions of C.G. Coperative Society Act 1960, Registration No Up Pan/R.P.R./49/80-81 Through President, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) w. I“, ,3 Ashish Hora S/O Ninder Singh Hora, R/O Shankar Nagar, P.O. Shankar Nagar, P.S.Civil Lines Raipur (C.G.) Junaid Shah Khwaja , S/o Maksood Hussina Khwaja, Income Tax Adviser, Amar Chwok, RajaTalab, P.S.civil Lines Raipur (C.G.) Alternative Address F-18, Sri Ram Nagar Phase-1, Near T.V.Tower, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Respondents/ Defendants Contd.2 u & E RESPONDENTS . Mathew Kutti Mathai @ K. Mathai DEFENDANTS Mathew and others. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CEVJL PROCEDURE (Sinqie Bench: Hon'bie Shri N.K. Aqarwaa, J.) Present : Shri Mukesh Sharma, counseiforthe appeliant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15‘“ day of February, 2011) Learned counsei appearing for the appenant submits that in View of the compromise arrived at between the partieS, this appea! has become infructuouo. Kw U\\ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR FIR$T APPEAL N0. 182 OF 2mm £XPPELLAN? Life insurance Corparation of mdia PLAINTtFF Versus 2. in View of above, the appea) ie dismissed as having become infruetuous. Sd/— N.K.Agrawal Judge