("!SlliWBS io:-:::SJiiSef^:y;::'1: ^"'^SES-I--^" c ^ ^o ^i IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARK W.P. N0. ^l € /2006 PETITIONER : ^ Prakash Kusre, Aged about 60 years, S/o. Balaji Kusre, R/o. Tatyapara, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.j VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education Deptt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) •r^t-1-ff, -con ci£^to 2] District Education Officer, Raipur Pension Bada, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.j -^.ofi Q/Blii^'Sl Director of Public Instruction Pension Bada, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA f^^^^';N%^:i-^.^'^^^''^^^^;'^S['^N^^.^8^1^^ ?^.'^^'^?A^3^^'^^^^^:i^"^^^^B^SK'^^®^.^ •'SS "fWWf{^SSSS<f: ,xRra? ur 1 b(i^7c> tlPfMI tRld^ ft^r' an^t 'si ,(<•<)* sn^i i5h^icfr yf?d Gowri ^ v^° y SIT^T ^iiWtrftd 7-1-2006 Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, counsel Shri S.S.Rajput, Dy. Gpvt. Adv., f< . Heard. Learned counsel for the petition< ompleted more than 24 years servi 'romotion Scheme hasnot been given imilar matter i.e. W.P. No.6504/2005 '.hhattisaarh &0thers). an order ha )-1-2006. He prays for similar order. State counsel does not dispute th( Having considered the facts and fact that the petitioner has completed| 5ervice and has not been given the bj 3cheme and further in view of ord| iA/.P.No.6504/2005, it is directed that N jand decide the case of the petitioner ir| Ume bound promotion. Accordingly, the petition is allowe( Certified copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel forcomplisji qii<<T<i<ili 'WRff'? isvs i^nere ^? 3Tpgir SRI^T .^. for the petitioner. theState, on advance copy. submits that the petitioner has ^e, but benefit of Time Bound to him. He further submits that in KV.K. Shrivastava vs. State of been passed by this Court on abdve fact, icircumstances and in view of the more than 24 'years of reguiar lenefit of Time Bound Promotion w passed in similar case i.e. ^ concerhed authority to consider accordance with law fQr grant of ce. Sd.'- Fakhruddin Judge [1[fr^^fe^ -^