IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2009 / 13TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 744 of 2009(Y) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26455/2008 Dated 02/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 3RD RESPONDENT ------------------------------------ ING VYSYA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MANAGER (RETAIL), ING VYSYA BANK LIMITED, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 16. BY ADVS.MR.R.S.KALKURA MR.M.S.KALESH MR.HARISH GOPINATH MR.V.VINAY MENON MR.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM) RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 ----------------------------------- 1. STANLEY.K.L., KALLUVEETTIL HOUSE, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 18. 2. RANJITH PAUL, S/O.STANLEY.K.L., KALLUVEETTIL HOUSE, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 18. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, KANAYANNUR, ERNAKULAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. P.C.SASIDHARAN R3 & R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.K.BABU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ R.P.No.744 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No. 26455 of 2008 ......................................................................... Dated this the 4th August, 2009 O R D E R The Review Petition has been filed by the Bank stating that at the time of disposal of the Writ Petition, the amount required to have the loan account regularised was stated as Rs.30,000/- instead of the actual amount required as on that date, i.e. Rs.55837/-, which is stated as an inadvertent mistake and hence is sought to be corrected. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner as well, who submits that, on the basis of the verdict passed by this Court on 02.07.2009 directing the Writ Petitioner to clear the outstanding liability towards the defaulted E.M.Is of Rs.30,000/- with interest and cost (as stated, at that point of time) by way of two equal monthly installments, the first one has already been satisfied and that in view of the present submission made from the part of the respondent Bank that the total sum required for R.P.No.744 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No. 26455 of 2008 2 regularisation of the loan account is nearly Rs.60,000/-, the Writ Petitioner might be given one more month's time to clear the outstanding arrears in this regard. 3. Considering the particular facts and circumstances and also taking note of the fact that the submission made from the part of the Bank was mainly with regard to the maintainability of the proceedings challenged from the part of the petitioner and hence the actual figures could not be brought to the notice of the Court at that point of time, the Review Petition as well as the Writ Petition are disposed of making it clear that the balance amount required to regularise the loan account as on 31.07.2009 will be Rs.55837/-. It is also taken on record that as on this date, one more E.M.I. stands liable to be effected, thus making the total liability of the petitioner at Rs.60212/- for having the loan account regularised. Subsequent to the verdict in the Writ Petition, the petitioner had already effected a sum of Rs.20,000/- as mentioned herein before. 4. In the said circumstances, the balance amount shall be remitted by the petitioner in two equal installments, the first of R.P.No.744 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No. 26455 of 2008 3 which shall be effected on or before the 31st of August, 2009 and the next one, on or before the 30th of September, 2009. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk