SBCWP NO.8092/02. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8092/2002. Gyan Chand Versus Zonal Manager & Ors. Date of Order:- March 16, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.K. Mathur for the petitioner. Shri Rajendra Arora for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT:- Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that even though the Conciliation Officer, Department of Labour, Ajmer forwarded the failure report to the Government of India dated 29/12/1994 but so far neither the reference has been made nor it has been declined. Shri Rajendra Arora, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the writ petition and submitted that order of penalty with regard to which reference is sought to be made was passed on 25/4/1990 and appeal thereagainst was dismissed on 19/9/1998. At this belated stage, more particularly SBCWP NO.8092/02. 2 when Government of India has not been impleaded as party respondent, this writ petition cannot be entertained. It is therefore liable to be dismissed. This writ petition is pending before this Court since 2002. Instead of therefore dismissing this writ petition for technical reason, I set the petitioner at liberty to make a representation to the Government of India. It is expected of the Government of India to consider and decide the same in accordance with law at the earliest. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil SBCWP NO.8092/02. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.7484/2002. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8092/2002. Gyan Chand Versus Zonal Manager & Ors. Date of Order:- March 16, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.K. Mathur for the applicant-petitioner. Shri Rajendra Arora for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT:- Consequent upon disposal of the writ petition, this stay application does not survive. Same is accordingly rejected. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil