IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 2872 of 2008. Decided on: 17.3.2009. ___________________________________________________________ Smt. Raksha Devi … Petitioner. Versus The State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. ___________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. ___________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral). The petitioner was selected for the post of Volunteer Teacher (L.T.). However, despite the appointment letter being issued to her, she was not permitted to join her duties. She assailed this action of the respondent-State before the H.P. Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal directed the Director of Education to decide the representation. The same was considered and rejected by the Director of Education vide Annexure A-3. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the petitioner was not possessing the essential qualification of Language Teacher Trained from recognized Institution. He further contended that the petitioner was permitted to submit the Language Teacher Training Certificate from the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?No. 2 recognized Institution. However, she failed to do so. It is, thus, apparent that the petitioner is not in possession of requisite essential qualification and she could not be permitted to join her duties as Language Teacher. Accordingly, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. March 17, 2009. (cr)