IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHAttlSCARH AT BILASPUR W. P/^ 0-S-b OF 200/ ^- C^' 'y& ^-^ PETITIONER OC?A .<^ ^^ ^^y' <^yv Shrimati Chhaya Dasgupta, W/o - Subrat Dasgupta,, Assistant Teacher Aged about 54 Govt. Middle School, Mana Camp, R/0 - Mana Camp Distt - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /y /y/ ..•" '>^ .••' ^s/ •2- c^y t>'^i3y' 4. Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) ^y^ / ^''s'* .•"~ ^''..?y .-••"" ^^ / ^.^3/ » y ^. Director, Public Instnictions Deptt. Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) / 3. Distt. Education Officer, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22T0F THE CONSTITUTION OF India FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WWT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. HI6H COURT OF C(*<ATTIS6ARH AT EO-ASPUR W.P. (5)No, 856 ofZ007 Petitioner Shrimati Chhcya Dasgupta Versus Respondents &>vt. of Chhattisgorh & olhers 1 - Single Bench: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satlrii K. Ajgmhutri. Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri 5otish Supta, Oy. 6ovt. Advocnte for -the State/respondents. ,'.. Oft&ER (Passed on this 13th day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner is workmg as Assistont Teacher in "the Sovemment Middle School, Mana Camp. Raipur. The petitioner obtaineel B. Ed. Examinortion certificate on 14.7.1992, on his own eaqwnses. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits •rtiat the question inyolved, herein asto trfiether the -heacher, who ob-tained B.Ed. Examination Cerf'ificate on his own expenses, is entitted to two advance increments. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of Ihe deciswn of •this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpwation. Durg and another {2006 QD MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of yashwmnt Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and ano'ther (Supro), came to the conclusion that the teaehers. who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examimition Certificate on their own ^- eaqaenses, are covered by -the circutar dated 24.12.98 (Annewire P/7) isaied by the Stcrte Sovemroent of AAudhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for -the petittoner further submits that Ihe facts and question of \OM invoh/edm the present casecre squondy covered by decision of -this Court m -the case of Vashwflnt Kianar Bharadwaj Vs. rtua'ucipal Corporation. Durg and another (Supra), to which leamed counsel oppearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agraes with the averment made by leamed eounset d^ipearing fw Itie petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitwn is ultowed m ternB of theofder (lassed "m the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharudwy Vs. Munteipal Corporotjon. Durg and another (Si4>ra), sub^ct to verifica*ion of the fact as to whelher the petitkmer has aeipiired B. Ed.Examinffitwn Certificate on his owi e^qwnses as per the circyhrs dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and fur-rtwr whether he has been pakl two odwswi increments or not. No order fss to costs. Bablii Sd/- Satish K-Agnihotti Judge