IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 208 OF 2011 (CIDCO) THROUGH THEIR AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SHRI. SANJAY S. DAHEDAR., ... Petitioner Versus RASHMI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI. N. P. VASU NAIR., ... Respondent Mr. A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 5th April, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Kantak, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 7th January, 2011 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vasco in Special Execution Application No.11/2006 by which the application for summoning Mrs. Manda Bandekar, Ex-director of the judgment debtor has been dismissed. 3. The executing Court has dismissed the application, inter alia, on the ground that there is no provision pointed out by the decree holder under which a witness can be summoned in the midst of cross-examination of a witness. I do not find any jurisdictional error having been committed by the executing Court. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Needless to mention that dismissal of Writ Petition will not come in the way of the petitioner from availing of appropriate remedy at appropriate time, if it is so advised. 4. The petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA