IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14017 of 1999 Between: CIEFL SC & ST Employment Welfare Association rep by its President K. Satyanarayana, S/o Suryanarayana. R/o. 1-9-34/A/10, Street No.10, Ramnagar, Hyderabad - 500048. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Registrar, Central Institution of English and Foreign Languages (CIEFL) Hyderabad 500007. 2 Govt. of India rep by its Secretary, Department of Education, Ministry of Human Resources development, New Delhi. 3 National Commission for Schedule Castes & Scheduled Tribes, rep by its Member State Office, Ground Floor, Telugu Samkshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500028 . .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ in the nature of a Writ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in Proceeding with appointments vide Advertisement No.IV dt.30.3.99 or Group A Posts and Lecturer's posts in the circumstances as stated above unlawful, and directing the Respondent No.1 to i) Declare the backlog of SC & ST posts in the teaching (Lecturers) post and non-teaching posts; ii) fill up the said backlog as matter of priority before proceeding with recruitment as per roster and . iii) Group the small cadre posts in Groups A & B of non-Teaching staff on the basis of salary, status and educational qualification and maintain a common roster for the posts thus grouped and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.BALAGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.N.PARAMESWARA REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.14017 of 1999 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed questioning the Advertisement No.IV dated 30-03-2009 mainly on the ground that backlog posts of S.Cs. and S.Ts. were not reserved for the concerned reserved category as per the roaster. It is submitted that now the respondent management has agreed to issue fresh notification by following the roaster. In view of the same, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is granted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. If no notification is issued by following the roaster, it is open for the petitioner to approach this Court. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 27th February, 2009. skmr