1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.11328 of 2009. Murari Lal son of Shri Bachchu Singh VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Others Date of Order :::: 03/11/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Chaudhari Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, Counsel for the Petitioner Mrs. Rekha Madnani, Dy. Govt. Counsel for the State *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, more particularly the reply submitted by the respondents. Apart from the present case, where the petitioner has been convicted for commission of the alleged offence under Sections 395, 396 and 397 of the I.P.C. as mentioned in Para 2 of the petition, which falls within the exception Clause of Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958, the petitioner also stands convicted in three other separate cases i.e. in case No.347/1999 under Section 394, I.P.C., in case No.18/2003 under Section 307, I.P.C. and in case No.728/2000 under Sections 148 and 332, I.P.C. The co-accused (brother of the petitioner) who was given the benefit of parole, is reported 2 to be absconding since 11.05.2008. Taking the totality of the circumstances into consideration, we do not consider it to be a fit case where the petitioner should be enlarged on parole at this stage, more particularly looking to the provisions contained in Rule 14 of the Rules of 1958. This petition stands dismissed accordingly. (K.S. Chaudhari), J. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/