IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49422 of 2008 DHIRAJ KUMAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 4.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In a case of kidnapping for ransom the victim is traceless. Victim’s room partner was examined who disclosed the name of Vikas, Anuj, Ravi and this petitioner. According to learned counsel, all the students were known to each other that is why petitioner’s name appeared but there is evidence regarding talk from petitioner’s phone to one of the suspects corroborating by print out taken in course of investigation. In case the petitioner is going to appear in admission test in the month of June that can be moved at the relevant time but the circumstances discussed above, disentitles the petitioner for bail. Prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI