THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.33663 of 2011 Date: 21.12.2011 Between: Smt. Purandeswari Lift Irrigation Mutually Aided Cooperative Society Limited, Parchur Mandal, Prakasam District, Rep. by its Chairman. … Petitioner and The Joint Registrar/District Cooperative Officer/ Registrar of Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies, Ongole, Prakasam District and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.33663 of 2011 ORDER : Heard Sri Koneti Raja Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation. 2. This writ petition, which is filed impugning a letter (an internal correspondence) of the 1st respondent, is misconceived. 3. The petitioner is a society registered under the provisions of A.P. Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995, established for the purpose of distributing water under the Lift Irrigation Scheme. It has impugned the letter dated 28.11.2011 Rc.No.2351/2011-D1 of the 1st respondent-Joint Registrar/District Cooperative Officer, Ongole, addressed to the 2nd respondent- Executive Engineer, APSIDC, Sub-Division, Ongole, in reply to his letter dated 24.11.2011 Rc.IDC/EE/OGL/DB/AEE/Devarapalli Lis/116/2011, dated 24.11.2011. 4. It appears that election to the Managing Committee of the petitioner-Society has not been conducted and there are certain allegations against the Chairman, namely Tokala Krishna Mohan and, as such, the petitioner-Society is not functioning. Therefore, the 2nd respondent sought a clarification by addressing letter dated 24.11.2011, to which, by means of the impugned letter dated 28.11.2011, the 1st respondent has replied to him by placing the facts. The said letter is only an internal correspondence, which has neither affected the right of the petitioner-Society nor restrained the petitioner-Society from discharging its duties. A perusal of the said letter clearly shows that the 1st respondent, while placing the facts before the 2nd respondent, has only suggested that the scheme might be entrusted to the newly registered society, the 4th respondent herein. It is not the case of the petitioner-Society that in furtherance of the impugned letter, the 2nd respondent has passed any order against it. Thus, there is no cause for the petitioner-Society to file this writ petition. 5. For the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition filed against the internal correspondence of the respondents is not maintainable and accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 6. In view of disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.41853 of 2011 is dismissed as unnecessary. ________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 21.12.2011. NOTE: Issue C.C. in one week. (B/O) Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.33663 of 2011 21.12.2011 (Msr)