1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL 398 OF 2008 (Gopal Tukaram Jayale vs. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 19, 2009. Heard Shri Kothale, learned counsel for the appellant and Smt. Khade, learned AGP for the respondent. The claim in Civil Suit was for interest of arrears of pension. The Courts have concurrently found the appellant not entitled to it. Shri Kothale, learned counsel, however, states that the representation made by the appellant before the State Government is being favourably considered. The learned AGP for the State Government denies knowledge or instructions about any such representation. Shri Kothale, learned counsel states that the Second Appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the consideration of said representation. In the interest of justice, Second Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn without in any way 2 jeopardicing the consideration of representation made by the appellant before the State Government / Education Officer. JUDGE *GS.