IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3\°\Q\ of 2010 PETITIONER 3 Q. AWéE’“ fax? RESPONDENTS ai \ Vs Anil Kumar Singh, son of Shri Ram SohawGil Singh Baghei, aged about 52 years, Occupation— Service, Posted as Vaidya in ,A resident of Village Thakurtola (Jamindari), via Gandai, District Rajnandgaon (CG) / 1‘ State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S‘ Bhawan, Mantralaya, FW/’ Q C“ A’rw //F C1 157 /Raipur. The Collector, Rajnandgaon. / Janpad Panchayat, Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon though its Chief Executive Officer (CG) k WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EWWW w €52 I?!) 3M a/l W200 WW WEmf‘aW ammm ‘WWiaH‘yirmR éwfmm WWW SB : Hon’ble shri Manindra Mahan Shrivastava, J. 5.7.2010 :1 for the petitioner. Shri Dinesh Tiwari, couns‘ Shri Satish Gupta, Govt.‘1-‘ 1 85 2, on advance copy. Heaxd. Grievance of the petition Vaidya in the year 1986, he w 1.4.1988 vide. Resolution dated the Janpad Panchayat, Ch raised on the ground that petitio er could not be granted the benent of regular pay—scale as he could no be regularized as Vaidya, nor entitled to grant of aforesaid pay—s is that after initial appointment as granted Tarachand Pay Scale W.e,f. 30.3.1988 (Annexure P—3) passed by n. Later on, audit objections were making payment of salaiy to o 3.6.2010, Janpad Panchayat proposing absorption of the peti oner on the post of Assistant Grade- III, but, thereafter, no orders hav been passed in case of the petitioner till date and the petitioner stand deprived of his salary nom October, 2009 . Thereafter, respondents stopped petiu'oner nom October, 2009. On Chuikhadan passed a Resolution Taking into consideration nature of grievance raised by the petitioner and that a Resolution as been passed on 3rd June, 2010 for consideration of petitioner’s ca e for absorption, respondents are directed to take appropriate dec sions with regard to the petitioner’s wattm (We) idvocate for the State] respondents No. h ’ a , e . XI~HC~78 status and entitlement for sal date of receipt of copy of this o In case, no decision is the stipulated period, petitions which he was earlier drawing, With the aforesaid obsem Praveen within a period of 3‘ months nom the €I‘. en in the case of the petitioner within shall be entitled to payment of salary, til iinai decision of his case. ations, the petition stands disposed oh‘. \ \ 5d Manindra Moira; “Ehrivaistava "" jadge