1 wp2949.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Writ Petition No. 2949 of 2010 Chandar Armogam Nayakar ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Ms. Anjali Patil-Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. F.R.Shaikh-APP for the State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 18, 2010. P.C. Considering the fact that the order passed by the appropriate Authority refusing to grant parole leave is appealable order, the Petitioner will be free to pursue that remedy, if so advised. All questions in that behalf are left open. In the event, there is any delay in filing of the appeal, we hope and trust that the Appellate Authority shall not non-suit the Petitioner merely on the ground of delay. Instead, decided the proposed Appeal on merits in accordance with law. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)