1 W.P.No4605/11 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4605 OF 2011. 1. Sharad S/o Shivaji Patil, Age 22 years, Occ.Service, R/o Umale, Tq. and Dist. Jalgaon. 2. Nilesh S/o Rajendra Chaudharim, Age 22 years, Occ.Service, R/o Khirwad, Tq. Raver, Dist. Jalgaon. 3. Samadhan S/o Yuvraj Chavan, Age 25 years, Occ.Service, R/o Kurhe (Kd.) Tq. Amalner, District Jalgaon. 4. Amolkumar S/o Chagan Sonwane, Age 25 years, Occ.Service, R/o Amalgaon, Tq. Amalner, District Jalgaon. 5. Rajdeep S/o Shivaji Patil, Age 28 years, Occ. Service, R/o 14, Vidyavihar Colony, Amalner, Tq.Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon. 6. Prashant S/o Shamkant Pawar, Age 25 years, Occ.Service, R/o Nipane, Tq. Erandol, District Jalgaon. 7. Deelip S/o Pralhad Patil, Age 21 years, Occ.Service, R/o Neri Digar, Tq. Jamner, Dist.Jalgaon. 2 W.P.No4605/11 8. Manish S/o Ramesh Deshmukh, Age 23 years, Occ.Service, R/o Wankothe, Tq. Erandol, Dist.Jalgaon. 9. Swapnil S/o Bhika Patil, Age 23 years, Occ.Service, R/o Pathri, Tq. and Dist. Jalgaon. 10. Ravindra S/o Atmaram Koli, Age 21 years, Occ.Service, R/o Pimpri, Tq. Muktainagar, District Jalgaon. 11. Smt.Monalisa Deelip Patil, Age 26 years, Occ.Service, R/o Vivare, Tq. Raver, Dist.Jalgaon. 12. Smt.Shabana Itbar Tadvi, Age 21 years, Occ.Service, R/o Walzira, Post Malod, Tq. Yawal, Dist.Jalgaon. 13. Meghshyam S/o Prabhakar Bhadane, Age 27 years,Occ. Service, R/o Plot No.4/1, Gat No.26, Nivrutinagar, Jalgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. 14. Hussain S/o Ughadu Tadvi, Age 23 yars, Occ.Service, R/o Walzira, Post Malod, Tq.Yawal, Dist.Jalgaon. 15. Sandeep S/o Suresh Bawaskar, Age 26 years, Occ.Service, R/o Kurhe Panache, Tq. Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon. 16. Mahanedra S/o Dagadu Patil, Age 27 years, Occ.Service, R/o Tilak Road, Sillod, Tq. Sillod, Dist.Ahmednagar. 17. Kalpesh S/o Chatrabhuj Gujar, Age 23 years, Occ.Service, 3 W.P.No4605/11 R/o Kalali, Tq. Amalner, Dist. Jalgaon. 18. Smt.Maheshwari Chabu Patil, Age 21 years, Occ.Service, R/o Pankajnagar, Plot No3-B, Yawal Road,Chopda, Tq.Chopda, Dist.Jalgaon. 19. Smt.Saroj Subhash Patil, Age 26 years, Occ.Service, R/o 40, Vidyavihar Colony, Amalner, Tq. Amalner, Dist.Jalgaon. 20. Smt.Pushpa Bhimdas Sapkale, Age 33 years, Occ.Service, R/o Wagh Nagar, Jalgaon, Dist.Jalgaon. 21. Vikrant S/o Purushottam Patil, Age 23 years, Occ.Service, R/o 18-B, Yogeshwar Colony, Singawe Shirpur, Tq. Shirpur, Dist. Dhule. 22. Mahendra S/o Sanjay Patil, Age 23 years, Occ.Service, R/o Rawanja, Tq. Erandol, Dist.Jalgaon. 23. Pratap S/o Sadashiv Pawra, Age 23 years, Occ.Service, R/o Amalwadi, Post Umti, Tq.Chopda, Dist.Jalgaon. ... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary for Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Education Officer 4 W.P.No4605/11 (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, Dist.Jalgaon. 3. Jalgaon Zilla Maratha Vidya Prasarak Sahakari Samaj Ltd., through its President Shri Bhagwantrao Jagatrao Deshmukh, Age 80 years, Occ. Business, R/o Varangaon, Tq. Bhusawal, Dist.Jalgaon. ... Respondents. ... Mr.V.D.Hon, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.A.D.Shinde, advocate for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 30.08.2011. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The grievance made by the petitioners in the present Writ Petition is that the services 5 W.P.No4605/11 of the petitioners were approved by the Respondent authority vide order dated 10.6.2011. Thereafter, without hearing the petitioner, the Respondent NO.2 vide order dated 23.6.2011, stayed the said order of approval. 4. If any order is to be passed detrimental to the interest of the party, the cardinal and fundamental principles of natural justice i.e. hearing to the said party is required to be followed. In the present case, the said order dt.23.6.2011 appears to have been passed without any notice to the petitioners. 5. In light of that only on the ground that the said order dated 23.6.2011, staying the approval is passed without hearing the petitioners, the same is set aside. I have not considered any aspect on the merits of the matter. The Respondent No.2 shall decide about the case of the petitioners after giving opportunity to all the parties to put forth their case. The petitioners are working. It is submitted that their salary bills are not 6 W.P.No4605/11 sanctioned though submitted. The Respondent NO.2 shall consider the case of the sanction of bills of the petitioners on its own merits expeditiously. Mr.Salunke, learned counsel disputes that the Respondent No.3 is represented properly and that Mr.B.J.Deshmukh, is his President. I am not entering into the said dispute as I am setting aside impugned order only on the ground that same is passed without hearing the petitioners. 6. The Respondent No.2 if it wants to reconsider the case of approval of the petitioners the same be done on its own merits after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties. All points are kept open. Rule made absolute in above terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp460511 7 W.P.No4605/11