1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10555 OF 2009 ... Shri Milind Hanmant Oak and another ...Petitioners v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/b Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for the Petitioners. Mr.Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents Nos.1 to 3 and 5 & 6. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, & A.R.JOSHI, JJ DATED: 6th January, 2010 P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate General appearing for the Government of Maharashtra states that the State Government has decided to cancel the Panel of District Government Pleader and the Public Prosecutor which was received from the District Collector and 2 therefore the process for preparing new Panel has been initiated. The Petitioner is free to apply in the new process that will begin afresh. He further states that the Respondent No.7 has been only asked to function as District Government Pleader and he is not appointed on regular basis on that post. Both statements are accepted. 2. In view of these statements, we do not find any substance in the grievance made in the petition. Petition is, therefore, disposed of. The Petitioner, however, shall be at liberty, if so advised, to challenge the decision of the State Government of cancelling the Panel. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (A.R.JOSHI, J.)