T 'T^T r^l^l^t^. ^Tli^^Ko, fa^Kiy STT^T 'q^I^ _y..:?.c.?.^.Q.^?.50/ 200^ ^IIHC^T 5b*<|ch "I^^T' ^TT^T^T f<riich ^n^r 5h^icb <if^a ^TT^T'^RTT^R ^rf^T ^piN TnTMf 4 'fe1^ '^^K '^'3lf;HH3n^T HJGHSOURTQFCH Coram:- Hon'ble Shri Dhilrendra Mishra & HATBiLAStUR Hon'ble S»hri*R.N, Chandrakar, JJ WBiTJLgJJTIONJP,U|.^N8,^0>M200§. PETITIONER Mukeshj Sharma S/o Shri Satyanarayan Sharm^, aged about 43 years, R/o in front of Dr. Bh^gwat, Brahmin Para, Raipur, Tahsll and Dis|trict Raipur (C.G.) RESPQNDENTS Versus 1. The S| SecreN ;ate of Chhattisgarh, Department Adrnini^tration and Local Bhawaiji, Raipur(C.G.) through the of Urban Seif, D.K.S. 2. The M<jnicipal Corporation, Raipur, through its Cctnmissioner, Municipal Corporatton, Raipur Verma 4. 5. (C.G.) 3. Naraya^ Prasad Verma, S/o Late Dukhuram aged about 58 years; Murli Verma, S/o Late Dukhuram Verma, aged a|3out 45 years; Dashr^th Verma S/o Late Dukhuram Verma, aged a^out 41 years; All ar^ Colon^l R/o Ward No.69, at Shanti Vihar Danganiya, Raipur, Tahsi! and Districl Raipur (C.G.) (Writ Petition Under Article 226 |of the Constitution of India) Presenf: Shri Maiay Kumar Bhaduril, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. f<j Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, c<^ >r the State/respondent No.1. unse'i appears for respondent No.2 [Tfr^ ^Ra^l w. ;'^: (h^ •-^'1 -HC-22 -^EET ^ii^id<4. ^nl^^Ko, fc«ni^i< 3T^T l^ra? _u3...?...C.f5IL) .2-3f.G ^i+<c(ii 9^*n^ 200- •I^ST" 37T^T^T f<TlJ5h 3Tli?r 5r»4-iicti ^f^a ^ ^T^T'^TTWHf^T OralOrdelr (Passed on 07-0)5-2009) PerHon'bleDhirendraMishr9,J:- The petitioner has preferred petition praying for a direction to the to decide his representation dated 02-( has prayed for action against respo^ construction in violation of the s^i CQrporation which causes inconvenier 2. Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, submite that this petition may be df respondent No.2 to decide the represc petitioner, if already not decided in ac^ period. 3. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learne|d No.2 submits that the pending repre^ be considered and decided in 4. Accordingly, it is directed th^l Corporation, Raipur shall consi<| representatjon, in accordance with possible, preferably within a period of( copy of this order. 5. Learned counsel for the representation to the learned counsell 6. In view of the foregoing, this p^tii accordNnce ^l^^l tTFT^if ^ f^Izt <p?l^|< '^3Tf^R3T[^r ^e insfeant Public Interest Litigation r|espondent No. 2 and its authoifties !p3-2009 (Annexure P-3) whereby h@ idenls No. 3 to 5 for undertaktng |ihctioned plan by the Muntcipat (ce to the public at large. |earned counsel for the petitioner Isposed of with a direetion to the ^ntation (Annexure P-3), Sled by the ^ordance with law within a stipulated counsel appearlng for respondent entation filed by the petitioner shall with law. the respondent No. 2 Municipal ler and dedde the aforesaid aw; on its own merits as eartv as weeks from the date of receiot of a p|etitioner shall supply a copy of ippearing for the respondent No.2. p^tition stands disposed of. ^iL Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge [TTt^ ^f^^