IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.60615-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:16.11.2006 Mahender Pal Sethi & Ors. ..........Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri G.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri M.S. Sindhu, DAG, Haryana. **** The Petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 429 dated 13.8.2006 under Sections 498- A/406/507 IPC, registered at Police Station City Rohtak, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners, who are father-in-law, mother-in-law and unmarried sister-in-law of the complainant, have been falsely implicated. Counsel for the petitioners further contends that in view of the order dated 29.9.2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from ASI Balwan Singh does not dispute this fact and further states that the petitioners are no more required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 29.9.2006 is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Crl. Misc. No.60615-M of 2006 -2- This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction. Disposed of accordingly. November 16, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE