IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2532 of 2011 Lakhan Singh ...Petitioner Versus Collector Haridwar, District-Haridwar and others …Respondents Present : Mr. M. S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for respondent no.3. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. M. S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. K. C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for respondent no.3. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the recovery citation dated 2.11.2011, which has been issued against him. Admittedly, the petitioner has taken a loan from Union of India, Branch KL Polytechnic, Ramnagar, Roorkee, District-Haridwar. Admittedly, the total dues against the petitioner is to the tune of Rs. 1,90,808 (One Lac Ninety Thousand Eight Hundred Eight). 3. Counsel for Union of India, Branch KL Polytechnic, Ramnagar, Roorkee, District-Haridwar is also present in the Court and states that it is agreeable to him, if the petitioner pays the entire loan by way of installments. In view of this the following orders are being passed, with the consent of both the parties: In case, the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh) on or before 9.1.2012, then the remaining amount of loan shall be paid by the 2 petitioner by way of four three monthly installments within one year along with interest. The first installment shall be paid by the petitioner on 9.1.2012 and so on. The last installment shall paid by the petitioner which shall include the interest thereon. In case, the petitioner commits even one single default in payment of installments, the respondents shall be at liberty to initiate recovery proceeding against the petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 5. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 7.12.2011 Kuldeep