IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH APRIL 2009 / 25TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11372 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.S.JOSEPH, KARIMPANAL HOUSE, VIZHIKATHODE.P.O.,KANJIRAPPALLY,KOTTAYAM DIST. 2. DONY SEBASTIAN,KARIPPAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 3. SHJAHAN.K.H,KAVUNKAL HOUSE, MUKKOOTTUTHARA.P.O.,PALAKAKKAVU, KANJIRAPPLLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 4. ANSALA SHAJAHAN, DO. HOUSE, DO. DO. 5. DENNIS JOY, PEEDIECKAL HOUSE KULAPPURAM KOOVAPPALLY.P.O.,KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 6. DAVIS JOY, DO. HOUSE DO. DO. 7. K.S.THOMAS,KARIMPANAL HOUSE, VIZHIKATHODE.P.O.,KOOVAPPALLY, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 8. ANITHA THOMAS,DO. HOUSE, DO.DO. 9. JOHN JOSEPHM, EDATHINAKKATHU HOUSE MANNARAKKAYAM.P.O.,CHIRAKKADAVU,KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 10. SHAJI MATHEW, THAKADIYIL HOUSE, CHIRAKKADAVU EAST, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 11. V.M.MATHEW, VELLAPPANNIL HOUSE, ARUVITHURA.P.O.,ERATTUPETTA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 12. MARIAMMA MATHEW, DO.HOUSE, DO.DO. 13. THOMAS NICHOLAS, KARIMPANAL HOUSE, VIZHIKKATHODU, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 14. JOSEPH NICHOLAS, DO. HOUSE, DO.DO. 15. K.S. SEBASTIAN, KARIMPANAL HOUSE VIZHIKKATHODU, KANJIRPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 16. ELIZABETH ALEXANDER, DO. HOUSE, DO.DO. 17. A.J.THOMAS, ARUVIYIL HOUSE, KODAKACHIRA,PALAI,KOTTAYAM DIST. 18. HANIBALL DOMINIC, KARIPPAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTTAMBALAM P.O.,KOTTAYAM. 19. BENOY CYRIAC, NJAVALLY HOUSE, PODIMATTOM, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.KRISHNA PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHIBHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION CIRCLE, K.S.E.B. POOVANTHURUTHU, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B. SUB STATION,SUB DIVISION, KANAKAPPALAM, ERUMELY, KOTTAYAM DIST. 5. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 66 KV SUB STATION, MUNDAKKAYAM, KOTTAYAM DIST. G.P. SHRI.C.K.GOVINDAN, ADV.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC FOR KSEB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.11372 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 15th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are challenging Ext.P6 order of the 1st respondent. Ext.P6 order was under challenge before me in W.P.(C).No. 11434/2009 on the ground that before passing that order, the petitioners in that writ petition were not heard. That writ petition was allowed by me today quashing that order. The same order is under challenge before me in this writ petition. Although in this case before passing the impugned order, the petitioners were heard, now that I have quashed that order, the 1st respondent is bound to pass fresh order. As such, this writ petition has become infructuous. In fact in that judgment I had directed that all parties be heard afresh. In the above circumstances, the 1st respondent is directed to pass fresh order after hearing all parties concerned. If the petitioners are still aggrieved by the fresh orders to be passed by the 1st respondent, it would be open to them to challenge the same. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2