IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2011 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 5659 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- IBRAHIM P.K., S/O.KOCHUNNY, AGED 65, MUDAKATHIL PUTHENPURAYIL (POONOLIL), KANAYANNUR TALUK, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, VADACODE KARA. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.ANEESH JAMES RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANIYOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DITRICT, PIN 682308. 3. THE SECRETARY THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANIYOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DIST., PIN 682308. 4. ELIYAMMA CHACKO, THE PRESIDENT, THIRUVANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANIYOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DITRICT, PIN 682308. SRI. V. MANU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR FOR R2 TO 4 SMT.V.SHYLAJA FOR R2 TO 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jma C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 5659 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of April, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the absolute owner in possession of property having an extent of 19 Ares 97 Square links made up of 10.85 Ares comprised in survey No.43/1, 7.20 Ares in Survey No.43/3 and 1.92 Ares in Survey No. 43/6-2 of Thiruvaniyoor Village. This writ petition has been filed mainly challenging Exts. P4 and P6. As per Ext.P6 it was alleged that the petitioner had been storing and selling drinking water illegally. It is alleged that the said activities on the part of the petitioner is violative of section 218 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. On receipt of the same, the petitioner has submitted a detailed explanation as per Ext.P7 dated 22.1.2011. Admittedly, after the receipt of Ext.P7 no final order has been filed. In view of the said position, I do not think it necessary for this Court to consider the various contentions raised in this writ petition on merits. Since, the respondents have already issued Exts.P6 and obtained explanation from the petitioner, it is incumbent on the respondents to issue final orders. WPC.5659/2011 : 2 : Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P7 and pass final orders on Ext.P6. This shall be done expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Sd/- (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge