FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3564 OF 200 PETITION NO. 3564 OF 200 PETITION NO. 3564 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri J.B.Kocheta with B.H.Bharaskar for petitioner. Shri S.M.Sabrad for Respdt.1/2 Shri J.N.Pawar for Respdt. 3. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.M.KANADE, V.M.KANADE, V.M.KANADE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 26TH JUNE,2006 26TH JUNE,2006 26TH JUNE,2006. P.C. 1. It is a consistant view taken by the Supreme Court that a writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should not be exercised for enforcement of a contractual right and obligations. What the petitioner is seeking is a contractual right for allotment of a particular tender for cleaning the gutter in a municipal area. Hence petition itself is not tenable. It is disposed of as such. ...