1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Review Petition No.2 of 2009 In Family Court Appeal No.78 of 2004 Shri Sanjay Bhikan Gujar Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Kanchan Sanjay Gujar Respondent Mr.Sandeep Salunkhe for petitioner CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & S.J. VAZIFDAR,JJ. September 16, 2009. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr.Salunkhe, the learned counsel for the applicant, who was respondent in Family Court Appeal No.78 of 2004. The said Appeal came to be allowed by us on 17th July 2009 and by this application he seeks to review the same. We asked Mr.Salunkhe whether the cost amount was deposited within the specified period of two weeks and, on instructions, he stated that it has not been paid. However, the applicant undertakes that the cost amount shall be paid tomorrow. We accept the undertaking. 2 2. We have gone through the grounds set out in the review petition and we are satisfied that the review petition is devoid of merits. Hence the same is hereby rejected. (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)