IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35360 of 2010(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- RAJESH P.R., S/O.RAJAN, POTTEKKAT HOUSE, KOZHUKULLY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, POONKUNNAM P.O., THRISSUR-680 002, REP. BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER. BY ADV. MR.M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, PCB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 35360 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 25th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner made Ext.P1 application for consent to operate an industrial unit. On receipt of the application, the officials of the respondent inspected the premises on 21/5/2010. Thereafter, they issued Ext.P4 informing the petitioner the inadequacies noticed by them and calling upon the petitioner to show cause why consent to operate shall not be refused. It is challenging Ext.P4, the writ petition is filed. Obviously Ext.P4 is in the nature of a show cause notice and it was open to the petitioner to reply to the same. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the matter in pursuance to Ext.P4, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp