IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6572 of 2010 JAGARNATH RAI, S/O SRI SUKDEO RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 09.03.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 47(a) of the Excise Act. 3. It has been submitted that when the vehicle in question was intercepted with loaded illicit liquor the occupant ran away, but, later on one person was caught on chase who was suspected to be the person who had loaded the illicit liquor on the vehicle. It has been submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner of the vehicle in question nor the claimant of the liquor and he has been implicated only on suspicion. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 25.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 182 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Sri T. Yadav, Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors 2 will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)