IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 41 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation …Petitioner. Versus Gauri Dutt …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent : None. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : I have gone through the judgment dated 12.12.2002 passed by erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 935 of 1998. Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned vice counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any error apparent on the face of the record. 2. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?