IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2151 of 2009 HARI SHANKAR CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and also the informant. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been named in the incident due to enmity in between the parties for family property otherwise there is no eye witness, save and except, informant wife of the deceased and her son and that also after hearing the sound of firing coming to Bathan and watching this petitioner fleeing which is opposed by submitting that enmity is there. The incident is of 2.30 AM. There is no possibility of coming of others and identification is of known persons. So, that cannot be doubted. In my view, the discussed circumstance even custody, does not justify bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected In case, the case is committed to the court of Sessions, the Sessions Judge, Samastipur will take step to expedite the trial of Sarairanjan P.S. case no. 02/2004. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI