1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.165/2011 (Shaikh Rauf Ahmed @ Rauf Ahmed s/o Gulam Dastgir Vs. The State of Mah. & Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Vijay Parkhe, Adv. for applicant; Mr.KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 25 th January, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) In a racket of encashing insurance policies of alive persons, posing them to be dead, the accused/applicant, prima facie, has played prominent role. he has avoided the fetters successfully. he would be unable to explain as to how the amount of Rs.5,00,000/- is credited at his behest and instance. All the documents, prima facie, are processed by the accused/applicant. If in the racket, he has 2-3 other associates/accomplice, to whom he has given reference, the Investigator will be taking care thereof. 3) The reliance placed by learned Counsel for the applicant/accused to the judgment of this Court in the matter of Mathloob Abdul Gafoor Qureshi and Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. reported in 1998 Bom.C.R.(Cri.) 735 has no application to the factual matrix of the case. 4) No case to exercise powers under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is made out, the application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/