IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6625 of 2010 1. RUKMINA DEVI WIFE OF SAHAB YADAV 2. RAJ KUMARI DEVI WIFE OF MUNNA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.9961 of 2010 TUNNA YADAV SON OF SAHAB YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report it has been stated that the marriage had taken place in the year 2001 whereas the present occurrence took place on 5.7.2009 and the submission is that it is not a case u/s.304B I.P.C and no question of any presumption against the in-laws. In view of the fact that apart from suspicion there is no cogent material to connect the present petitioners with the crime as also that the doctor was examined during investigation who supported the fact that the deceased was medically treated before her death for diarrhoea, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court No.IV, Bettiah, West Champaran in S.Tr.No.585 of 2009 arising out of Shikarpur P.S.case No.164 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of - 2 - the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )