IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.5194 of 2005 Between: Gali Ramanadham Naidu ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Yerpedu Mandal, Chittoor District and 4 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.5194 of 2005 O R D E R: The only grievance of the petitioner is against the official respondents stating that they are interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of his property without following due process of law. This Court, while admitting the writ petition on 16.03.2005, passed an interim order directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner without following due process of law. The learned counsel for Respondents Nos.4 and 5 submits that there is a dispute with regard to the right, title and possession of the subject matter and under the guise of the interim orders passed by this Court, the petitioner is taking advantage of the said order. I am of the opinion that the interim order passed by this Court is only applies to the official respondents but not to the unofficial respondents. The interim order dated 16.03.2005 is restricted in so far as Respondents Nos.1 to 3 only, but not in so far as Respondents Nos.4 and 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondents Nos.1 to 3 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner, without following due process of law. However, it is for the petitioner as well as respondents Nos.4 and 5 to work out their remedies in a Civil Court of jurisdiction. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 10.03.2011 Dsr