1 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8205 OF 2009 Yashwant Sopan Hankare : Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr. S S Redij for the Petitioner Mr. Vinay Masurkar, GP, for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Ashish Kamat i/by Kanga & Co. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : S B MHASE & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 12th October 2009 P.C. 1. The Petitioner has filled in two application forms in the scheme, applications for which were invited by the Respondent No.2. He has been allotted a flat on the basis that he was the highest tenderer/offeror in respect of one application form. It is the case of the Petitioner that he was also the highest tenderer/offeror in respect of the second application form. It would be pertinent to note that the Petitioner has been allotted a flat. It is not as if the Petitioner has been deprived of a flat. We do not find anything arbitary in the action of the Respondents is allotting a flat in respect of one of the application forms wherein the was the highest. No interference in our writ jurisdiction is warranted. The above Petition is accordingly rejected. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [S.B.MHASE, J]