1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3991 OF 2000 Mpl. Council, Umrer v. Smt. Suman Vaantrao Raut & ors. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.S.G.Charde Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.R. Patil Advocate for Respdt. no.1. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 7 th AUGUST, 2007. C.A. No. 3189/07 This application has been taken out by the petitioner for final disposal of the writ petition. Having heard both the counsel for the parties, it appears that the writ petition can be disposed of finally. Both the parties have consented to dispose of the writ petition in view of the statement made in paragraph 3 of the civil application which is quoted below : “It is pointed out that the respondent has been absorbed as 2 per the Government policy and she has been given benefit in accordance with law in the matter and the grievance in the present writ petition accruing on account of the order passed by the learned Industrial Court has been rendered infructuous.” In view of the above statement, the grievance of respondent no.1 has been redressed. Consequently, writ petition is rendered infructuous. Same is disposed of as such. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE /TA/