r ^ i o^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE : CG : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0 (S) : ^33(, OF 2009 PETmONER R.S.Koshta aged49yrss/oShriK.P.Koshta Assistant Engineer, Water' Resources Department Akaltara, Sub-Division-8 Loharsi, Distt-Janjgir-Champa A^ ^^CTl5% ^y^" WRIT FETFTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF IN®IA The State of Chhattisgarh Throiigh : The SecretaTy t6 the Govt of CG, , Water Resources Department, { D.K..S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur CG TheChiefEngineer Water Resources Department Distt-BaaspurCG Blir'! ?'i:: »i T :C—78 an^r'w !<•<)•* T^TT 411^1 sii*li<ft *twpir ^hwch 3^[ •<ii<iid'4, ®-alwis,f^yi'yy ........l4.&..t&.:)L..^o-2>4 200^ an^T 'q^q? (•jql'i'tyi) TOIIWBft^I OT^l Shri Aaurag Dayal Shri' Shri Suinesh Bajaj, G.A ChaUenge ia fhe prese 30.6.2009 passed by fhe S petitioner who is worldni transferred from. Akaltara D Engineer, MInixaata Baiigo Cs Grievaace of the petitio transfer where froiu 6.7.20C tun.es. Contention of coiuisel 1 pemiitted to withdraw the p: representauon to the State that a direction inay be iss decide the representation so reUeved froia his present placi Lcamed counsel for peti.tion.er iiiakes a represent fhe coiupetent authority. Accordiagly, the petitio <shi<rf^iefti *iw<n? ^f fe^ <r»!-^i< ^sifipTaiit?! ^astava, counsel for the petitioner. !. for the State. nt petitfcon is to the orier dated itate Gover&ment bv which fhe is Assistant Enguieer has been [vision to ofiice of fhe Executive nal Division, Sakti. aer is that it is a case of fi^quent '7 he has been transferred four [sr the petitioner is that he inay be [-eseat petition wifh liberty to file Goveninient He further subuiits ued to fhe State Govenuneut to made aad tiU then he luay not tse s ofposting. tle State has ao obiection if fh.e btion and fhe sanie is decided bv b is disnussed as wifhdrawn wifh tlie aforesaid liberty. In fhfc eventuality of the petitioner's sn^i'Til^-ii'* wv ^n^i st)*ii^ ^nwii <»»*<i<h 'S^I "4iqiM^, ®TllwiS,fayi+iy ^.........^:.a.L^...^z^.^ ^oo 3^iTra?i' ('i°il^'l'^) wnw^ftd sn^i m.akin.g such representatio| receipt of this oi-der, fb.^ aufhorities wifhin a period| receipt. It is clarified that reUeved from the presen-tj relieved. a within ten davs from fh.e date of saoie would be decided bv fhe of fhree weeks fi-om. fhe date of its tUl then the petitioner shaU not be place of postuig, if' not ah^ady ^inferih iwraf.ti fe^t <fa^i< ^aifina'n^r —^.^'-, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge