MFA 22/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. P. KATAKEY Heard Mr Sarkar, learned counsel for the appellant, as well as Mr DCK Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant, by present appeal, has challenged the order dated 29 Nove mber 2007 passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, Guwahat i in Claim Application No.274/2001, whereby & where-under a sum of Rs.6,952/- ha s been awarded as compensation for shortage and damage of the commodity in quest ion. It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the matter in is sue has been answered by this Court in judgment and order dated 1 June 2009 pass ed in MFA No.102/2007 & batch. Learned counsel, therefore, urged that the impugn ed order be set aside and the matter be remitted to the learned Tribunal for fre sh decision in terms of the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment. Having regard to submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the imp ugned order dated 29 November 2007 is set aside and the matter is remitted to th e learned Tribunal for decision afresh after recording the reasons as to why a c ertain amount has been taken as the price per kilogram as the reasonable rate in the absence of Beejak. Learned Tribunal shall make an endeavour to dispose of t he said application within six months from today. The parties are directed to ap pear before the learned Tribunal on 5 January 2011. The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. No costs.