C.R.No.1629 of 2010 (O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.1629 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Order: 17.8.2011 Rai Singh and others .....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Ashwani Bura, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Yashpal Malik, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for respondent No.22. Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate (for respondent Nos.29,42,43,44, and LR of R.No.27 in C.R.No.1629 of 2010 and (in C.R.No.1631 of 2009 for Respondent Nos.29,42,43 44,69,70,72,74 and LR of respondent No.27). Mr. Anand Chhibar, Advocate. (for respondent No.99 in C.R.No.1629 of 2010) (for respondent No.67 in C.R.No.1631 of 2010) (for respondent No.45 in C.R.No.1630 of 2010) (for respondent No.13 in C.R.No.1632 of 2010) JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) This order shall dispose of four revision petition bearing C.R.No.1629, 1630, 1631 & 1632 of 2010, which have been filed by Rai Singh and others under Article 227 of the Constitution against the judgment/award dated 14.12.2009 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Panipat dismissing four references instituted under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “1894 Act”) for apportionment of compensation awarded qua four separate pieces of land acquired by the C.R.No.1629 of 2010 (O&M) #2# State of Haryana, claiming to have mortgagee rights. At the time of arguments, Sh. Arvind Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.22 points out that in view of the provisions of Section 54 of the 1894 Act, the present revision petitions are not maintainable as only first appeal is liable to be filed. Learned counsel for the respondents further submit that they would raise no objection qua the limitation aspect in case the appeals are now filed within a particular time frame. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the petitions with permission to file fresh appeals within a period of eight weeks from today in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn. It is clarified that in case the appeals are filed within eight weeks from today, the question of limitation shall not be permitted to be raised by the respondents and till eight weeks, status quo existing as on today shall continue. A photo copy of this order shall be placed on all the connected files. August 17, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE