IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40644 of 2009 Rajnish Kumar, S/o Ganesh Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Azanakot, P.S. Motipur, District-Muzaffarpur. ………Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 02. 04. 2010. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 45/08, dated 01. 04. 2008, registered under Sections 304 B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even according to the prosecution case, there is no specific allegation of demand of dowry and torture against this petitioner and that allegation is against other co-accused persons. He further submits that petitioner is younger brother of the husband of the deceased. Furthermore, subsequently, statement of the informant was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein he has himself contradicted the entire prosecution version and has stated that deceased had died because of a snake bite. In the aforesaid back ground, the petitioner, namely, Rajnish Kumar, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Muzaffarpur, in connection with Motipur (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No. 45/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)