THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 16687 of 2010 Dated: 14.07.2010 Between: Smt. Kandikonda Lakshmi, Visakhapatnam and 3 others. … Petitioners And The Government of A.P., Rep., by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam District and 5 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 16687 of 2010 O R D E R : The petitioners herein claim to be the residents of Visakhapatnam. Pursuant to the scheme introduced by the Government called JNNURM (Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission), proposing to allot plots on priority basis to certain communities, it is stated that initially it was decided to construct 28 plots in G + 3 pattern. When the applications were called from the interested persons, the petitioners submitted applications and 45 persons were selected, including the petitioners, for allotment of plots. However, as only 28 plots were available for construction, it was decided by the 1st respondent to allot plots by drawing lots among the 45 candidates. Accordingly, the proceedings dated 10.06.2009 were issued allotting the plots to the 28 members who succeeded in the lots drawn on 09.06.2009. It is claimed that the petitioners herein were shown at Serial Nos.12, 16, 23 and 28 of the list so drawn on 09.06.2009. After completing the entire process, the 1st respondent had issued proceedings to that effect and the petitioners were informed that they were allotted F-4, S-4, F-2 and F-5 respectively. While so, it is learnt that some new names were included in the list of allotment and on an application made under the Right to Information Act, the petitioners came to know that the names of the petitioners were subsequently deleted and a new list has been prepared including the names of the respondents 3 to 6 herein. Aggrieved by the said action, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation. As could be seen from the material available on record, the scheme has to be implemented in terms of the guidelines issued from time to time under G.O.Ms.No.638 dated 23.08.2007 as well as G.O.Ms.No.658 dated 03.09.2007. It is alleged by the petitioners that the allotment now made in favour of the respondents 3 to 6 is contrary to the above said guidelines. It is not disputed before this Court that the Commissioner of the 1st respondent-Corporation is the competent authority for implementation of the scheme in question. In the circumstances, the interest of justice would be met if the entire allotment process is reviewed by the 1st respondent by taking into consideration the grievances of the petitioners Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to submit their objections before the 1st respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Thereafter, the 1st respondent shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as the respondents 3 to 6. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the objections from the petitioners. Till such time, the possession of the plots in question shall not be delivered to the respondents 3 to 6 herein. No costs. ​ ____________ G.ROHINI,J Date: 14.07.2010 KLP