IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33404 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR PANDEY Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sweta Devi ----------- 2 15.09.2010. Petitioner has come to this Court for modification of order dated 20.5.2010, passed by this Court in Cr.Misc.No. 1273 of 2010 by which he had been allowed anticipatory bail in Sasaram (Model) Police Station Case No. 509 of 2009, GR.No. 1581 of 2009 with condition to pay Rs. 1,500/- month to his wife, the informant, till issue of maintenance/alimony is adjudicated by the Family court. Petitioner submits that this issue has already been decided by learned Principal judge, Family Court, Rohtas at Sasaram vide order dated 3.2.2010, passed in Maintenance case no. 91 of 2009. The Family court has directed the petitioner to pay Rs.5000/- month to opposite party no.2 as maintenance money. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he did not place this fact as he was not aware of the same while arguing the bail petition disposed of vide order dated 20.5.2010. Learned counsel for the State does not controvert the aforesaid assertion of petitioner. In view of above, conditions imposed in para 5 and 6 of order no.4 dated 20.5.2010 is modified with observation that petitioner is no longer required to pay Rs.1,500/-month to opposite party no. 2 in compliance of order dated 20.5.2010. Let this order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Shashi. ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)