N§QH QCéLIR‘’E OF 3%"EHA'§?§SQ&RH ik? 3%L§3§Ei§ %§¥E éGM EE§¥E£H gGw§§L& $%§RE EW$EEE§ Gxiim'ii‘e SA gs n EIE $§€RE $§§R§§i é‘il‘éiMgaR $§§QE§§5 “E. $§E€t§§ @‘3 Eda M? {3? 2€W$ Babu Lsi é-a:§% 30H a? Purm' Ram P&%§é, agad 35 yeam. @hanamm son cf Mukhimm Vemm, agaé 36 years. Ecth aw Oesusaimn Agyésuiiuriga’ Labourer, re$§dené of Véfiage Nawagaon, RC}. Ngrayanpur, 93. Chowki _ Mam, ‘§"ah$§§ Nawagar; , Disiric’é ELifg (C.G.) Vwwg ».w Fu§sai Gama 8X0 Samgiy L3; Gugzta, aged 42 yaam Qmupa'tém _.. my'w when RIG Vii§age Raggndra agar, I giwggpun Bi3€r§¢t Biiasw; }h Harjmcia“ $§ngh 8/9 Harvansh (”in Lg mngu, a§a 45 wars, txccupatian Euséness {cvmer a? ve§ icie} Rig viélage Tegibandha, Raipur, Diskrici: Raépw (CG) (i)s Branch ,Mafz‘ager, Umtw §nd§a msuianse f3cm§5arw Lim§ieé, Bmnch Office Karim Siadmm, TP. Nagay, ”S and Tahsi§ 8: Disiric? Koma {c.G.) Nareéxh Kumar w/o not kncswa. Surgeet Singh S/e moi knewn. aged 55 yeaa M Baih afe through Jeevan Bus $a{vices, Paadri; Bus Séaféd, Raipur; neg? H0ra Compéex. Ra%pur {$6.} £n$urance Company, the Qrienia? t‘l insurance Cemgaany, Jaii Road, Kachahari Chowk, Raipur (0G) Misce§égneous Awpeak under Sectiaalj T3 cf Mom? VehicEe kct Prsseni: Sam Vimiesh §aj§3at ieamad coui1$a% far me agpeimnts. Name far {espondents Ne. 1i 2, 4 & 5, Shr§ H3. AgrawaE, £$£im$§ fieniar Caume§ Wiih Ehri J.K, Santa, geamed ccunael far {egpmdeni No.3. Shvi Ajay Mishra; ieamed coun$el for responéenf No.6. @REEER Mg“ Maw amam " Emmy; mvwv; The feiicwing arder 0f the Cami was pa$sed by Ragew Gum’a. SAM Leamed caunse! far the parties am heam‘ on ; LCP. Na. 157'9l2808, a petitien fos’ condcnaiiar: 0f ”‘zhe deiay m fmng ihe appeak 2. Cm due canskieratbn. MSP. N9. ’§5?Q!2096 is a§39wed and the deia‘y‘ m f%%ém Ehe ap§ea§ E3 hereby comdoned. 3 Shri Vimkesh Bajpai, ieamad coumei agar the appgiiamg is heem 0n ac§m§s3i0m 43 Appeiiantgx‘ c§aimants Skim iai Paii§ 8: Ghanazram, are $$eking enhancemani‘ a? the Gammsawiien awarded by the Addiiioraa§ Mamr Acciderr: Giarms ‘E‘ribunai, Eematara, Dis‘arist Burg (fcr shart ‘the Tribuna§’) vicéa @Jvard dated 24.64.2006, passed irz Ciaém Ceee Nefr33f2i304. 5. A8 against rhe somnensatien Qf RSIGQOQM claimed by the aeaeiiamef derma‘nts by firing a eiaim peti’iien under Seetien 166 0f the Meier‘Vehicies i—‘rct fer the mjurree eusrained by rhem in the aw mater acaident can 24.06.2004,'%he TribunaE awarded a tow $um 9f Rs.4,000!- {Rs.2,060l— for each claimant} as compwsatien atang wi€h intaresf: @ 6% per annam from the dam of filéng 0f ihe cEaém peiitéan tEiE the cEate of 3mm magma? 6. Shri Vimtegh Bagpai‘ §eamed munse£ far ihe appe§fant$ v‘eh&m&niiy argued thai ihe Gampenation of Rs.4-,QQO/~ &warded by the Trébuna! is 'ms kow in mmparigen tag mg seriows injméaS guaniamed by the apgzelign’is! claiman’za in'the meter agsig‘ent. 7. The Tr§bunaé an a thoraugh scratmy s? ihe evidence §ed by “me maimamts heid in para 12 9f ihe awarcé thai ‘L‘he ingurieég sustained by ciaimams 3am Lai Pam & Ghanaram were simpée in nsiure. Tha Tribunai; therefsre, awarded Rs.2,0QG/- each as CGnWpensaiian ta Ehe céaimgms. 8. Far the reasions best knawn to the appeitams I céaimants no doctcr was exammed before the TrEbunel i0 estebiieh the‘é the injuries susiamed by the appe§¥aniel daimanis in we meior accidem were gfievous in nature and the fact tha’e these injuriee reswied in any permanent dieabiliiy. 9. The question whether the medieai certificate predeeeci by the Cieimant befei'e ihe Tribunai i iihoui examining ihe Boater whe issuee rhe eertificere can be reiieci upon as subeten’rive evidehee fer the eeeessmeht of the campeheeiion came up r’er ceneidereigian before ihe Aeex Gear? in ihe case of AHPE'gRi6 m i? Ehimeei Eezieiy; reeorreci ie §2®Q§§ E2 sca we; wherein ii wee ebeerved in pera § as under : x «a v‘H A‘mr hearing ieamed csunsei for the miucm—C!annaxu WhG matge afi EuEi’i‘lW #é- -! éva 1U suppmt we arder of the High Cam, we find that there was no iustificatian fOr ihe HEGh Court to reiy 0n he d‘$agilltv cemucate issued by Dr SudhaKa; Ready gand e’ahanue the ccmpensmum Qy ‘iaaiirg the immy a$ permanemt {jisabéiky to be 45 per ceni. The Hiah Cam semmitted czms$ army in overioakim the fasi ihat Urn Sudhakar Reddv’3 medisa! certificaie wa$ reéecwa‘ bv the Tribunai for non—examination 0f that dcctar. The TribunaE hag deiermined the phvsicaE disabm’w at 15 Ber cent an ihe bas§s 0f ‘iha depcsiiian 0f Dr. KM. Mitra and w'waau a just am? fair eamwi‘lsa‘iiw. "i”hé ‘r'ékgh Com awed in di3§urbing the Same and. enhancinq mée comgan$a£iim Con3eaguen?%y, we ivili’aw’ 't‘n%$ appgai, 3e: Esme the §mpugned owe! and restore the award of the Claims Tribunai. The respwdehb c!aim&nt r is aElawed to mmdraw the amount 0f Son’ipwsa'tion awamed by the 'Ribunat if it has mi: aireacfy been wimdrawn.” 10. The epex Com in e recent cékfzum m €he case e? Regeeég e§§ee Fiage m Yetihvh‘ $mgh and enemeeg reemed in Kama sama View with we fsEE (2mg; '2’ $631: 3&5. reiterated im abserzia‘: “ “:1. The certificaie m qazesiian m this case was wiained afier iwa yaam. R i$ not known as to whether the Civié Sw'gem 0f i‘he hggpétal treated. fhe epeeilan‘k. 0e what baeés, euch a certéfmaie was ieebed fwc yeare af'm the avcifem teak New 2 mi knewn Tt‘e auix 0? ca? the ewe bemjeat eee m’: been exammee. Unieee he amne? e? He aeeifinaie egamined hémse}? y? ”we—x, rm adméseihie h evidence. ‘xfxfheme? ihe weanlm a? 5Q% xae e ‘ee :31“; ihe fhe Wez'Krl’ien‘e Cempeeeeiien Aet er e‘itherwiee E? mi known! 9f: ie else moi Knewe 3e ‘Eo wheiher he wee eewm‘i‘ewt "2g ieeue eueh re’e §t even deee u raieeu eefere Lie auntie e Qgairzmi'i, am fag m5 fa apmia ims m para ”M : me? we a: amx tue eenxeei bee mbmaE 0? +i‘e Mu Cow: Tne T? b i ae gh Gear i3 wugigm Uh x y eementéee C} —hv 53} m 3?“* e” VVVVV mexemne, grudeeeed a“ ihe e‘ {eeerd yt o sari e Ue e eemieebtm ef whim, in em “ewe heeur e , ihe‘seme, if: me Woramer {to 1 w a ’i , ‘ ’ “f A i in i e' m y 0w opinian, cannot be peiymftted i0 be raised mf the first time? 11‘ in \fiew 0f the above quatezj dfcfa of the Apex Court in the gasieg of LXP $R‘m v, Pg ‘a‘hiwmi Reédy (Supra; and Rgjew Kama? aiias Raju K1. ‘(adhvir E‘smgh am“; anaihea‘ (Saga), ’ihe medisa: certficaies pmducw by the appaiianta’ ciaimants befare ‘ ihe Tribuna! witmut examinmg ihe dac‘iaf Wm issued tmsa g cawifiaaws, Gama? $9 "zaken im‘e geiwsweratiah for enhanéement a? ‘Ehe ’ ? campewsaiian awarded by {he Tribunaé. ” 12‘ Wa thaefore, (ii) not find any scopa fa? enhancemen‘t 0‘? ihe aompamsaikm awardem‘ by %h$ Wibunai. 13 The appeai, "iheremre, is; éiahie i9 Egg d§$mi3$e§ and §$ hsreby ; iiismisgssazi summafEQy. _;R\‘ Sdl— Sunil Kumar, s_Inha ‘ w K ChieEgilstice Judge nimmi j"