IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.145 of 2006 In A.O.No.411 of 2001 Mohinuddin J. Shaikh .. Applicant V/s Amirtali Abdul Virani and Ors..Respondents S.S.Mishra for A.R.Pande for Applicant Shri V.T.Lulia for M.S.Diwadkar for Respondent nos.2 and 3. CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED:7th April 2006 P.C.:- . Heard Mr.Mishra holding for A.R.Pande for Applicant. He submits that Advocate Mr.Pande has gone out of Station and as such matter be adjourned. This is strongly opposed by other side. The record shows that previously also the matter was adjourned at the instance of the applicant. Moreover admittedly the suit has been disposed of. So, in fact A.O. is not maintainable. The learned Advocate for the applicant also submits that he has filed application for restoration of the suit but admittedly the same is not restored nor any stay is granted in the same. . Under the circumstances there is no justifiable reason to grant any adjournment. The matter is dismissed for default as Mr.Pande is not present and the advocate holding is not ready to proceed with the matter. . Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (S.R.SATHE,J.)