SWfn f- RF¥f'U ^.^yj^A^iy. ifs^.''^ '.^;' C /-/' £Tfo ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASSUR WRXT FETITIOH (S) N0.~?32& OF 2006 EETlTIOi3ER ^ Suresh Kumar Soni, Sos of late Rekha Ram Soni, aged atout 45 years, uorking as aa Assistant Teacher, Govfc. Primaiy Sctaool, Pahad Para, Chitarpur, Biock s Lundra, District s Surguja, ( C G ) VERSUS RESPOHDEHTS A^ <^c., €^ '^ <;y <^.- K'* ^,^ ^.^'^ " v<1 ^ ' .A-' , ^'' -; ^3""\<'7 ^' •s % fl/ ~" rf- 1. State ©fChhafctisgarh through the Seeretsry, Panchayat & Social Welfare Deparfciaenfc, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Collector, Ambilsapur, District ; Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Assistaat Goramissioner, Tribal Deyeloptaent, Ainbik^ur, District ; Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 4. The District Project Director, Rajiv Ga&dhi Shiksba Hission, Ambikapur Dist rict s Surguj a, Chhafctisgarh. 5. The Biock Edscation Officer, Lundra, District ; Surgaja, Chhattisgarh. 6. Shri Bharat Ram YadaV* Upper Division Teacher, Goverrunenfc Mj.ddle School, Chitarpur, Block s Lutidra District s Surguja ( C'G ) c^ WBSS-S^SSJ.Sy viaDES_SBSJClS_S2.&»SJ£SJi°BS£SSX3SaLSF INDI& FOR ISSUANCB OE APEROERI&TE WRIT IN THE HATORE_CT' MAHDAM0S, CERTIORARI, DIRECTI^_._..._^^___... ETC. s^^^^^^ss^ss';'^- F) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. 1.. WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.7330 OF 2006 PetiBoner Respondents versus Suresh Kumar Soni State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. V.KPandey, counset for ttie petitioner. Mr.Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for respondents No.1to5. <thORDER <Passed on 4m Day of January, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petrtioner confines its prayer to relief clause No.7.3 and the petiUoner has given-up other reliefe sought for, as stated in paragraphs 7.1 and 7.2 ofthe petition. The relief clause No.7.3 of e petition is as under:- "7.3. The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direet the respondente to consider and d«;idethe representation made by the petitioner vide Annexure P-8 & P-9 within the sBpulated period in accordance with law." r Subhash 2. Learned Government Advccate appearing for the State/respondents No.1 to 5 has no objech'on if the timited prayer made by the petitioner, as stated in para 7.3 of the petition, Is granted. 3. Representations dated 23-10-2006 (Annexure P/8) and dated 7-11-2006 (Annexure P/9) are pending consideration. The respondents - authorities are directed to considerand decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weete from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of with ttie above- stated direction. No order as to coste. Sdi'- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge