BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12028 of 2011 1. AZHAGARSAMY 2. KANNAN 3. MURUGAN : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.4 to 6 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI. : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.APPADURAI Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.4 to 6 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.1 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A4 to A6 and a false case has been registered against them under Sections 498(A) and 506(i) IPC. The petitioners herein are paternal uncles of the first accused. The marriage between the first accused and the de-facto complainant was performed in the year 2008. He further submits that the accused 1 to 3 namely husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law have already been enlarged on anticipatory bail and the investigation is considerably over and hence, they prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the case has been registered against A1 to A6. A1 to A3 who were husband, father-in-law and mother-in-law of the de-facto complainant already enlarged on anticipatory bail. He further submits that the accused are demanded ten sovereign of gold and Rs.2,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of the petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions, the marriage was performed between the first accused and the de-facto complainant in the year 2008 and the case has been registered in the year 2010 against the accused and A1 to A3 who are husband, father-in-law and mother-in- law enlarged an anticipatory bail and the present petitioners are only paternal uncles of the first accused, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 05.30 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. Sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM,. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. K.APPADURAI Advocate SR.No.30888 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12028 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 NSV/13.9.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/