IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31481 of 2011 Pradeep Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 2 16-09-2011 It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was granted bail vide order dated 11-08-2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25378 of 2011 but in the order, in place of Complaint Case No. 934 C of 2009, it has been mentioned as Complaint Case No. 834 C of 2009 as because, in the prayer portion, inadvertently Complaint Case No. 834C of 2009 has been typed. It is also submitted that the name of father of O.P. No. 2 Budhan Yadav has wrongly been typed as Budhan Yadav in place of Baudhu Yadav. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion as also father’s name of O.P. No. 2 and similarly in the order dated 11-08-2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25378 of 2011 in place of Complaint Case No. 834C of 2009, it should be read as Complaint Case No. 934 C of 2009. Accordingly, the order is modified to the extent mentioned above. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)