IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1277 of 2007 ZAFAR EKBAL S/O LATE MD. HASHIM --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. ABDUL SALAM --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03 31.08.2010 Heard both sides. While supporting the application filed against the order rejecting the application made under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’), it has been submitted that in the particular facts of the case, allegation contained in the F.I.R. is/are absurd as two daughters of the informant were married in the family of the petitioner whereas own sister of the petitioner was married to the only son of the informant. It is next contended that the post mortem report does not fully support the prosecution case inasmuch as the injuries found responsible for her death were the result of bedsore. It is next contended that the own sister of the victim was in the house and in that situation the allegation contained in the F.I.R. does not appear to be real rather concocted. It is further contended that the present case has been lodged for ulterior reasons. At the stage of framing of charge the Court has only to satisfy from the materials on record whether there is/are sufficient materials on record justifying the framing of charge. Admittedly as per the F.I.R., the victim was tortured in the matrimonial home on account of non fulfillment of dowry and she was admitted to the hospital with certain injuries on her neck caused in mysterious circumstances. It has occurred within 07 years of the marriage. This Court, considering the scope of the jurisdiction invoked by learned trial Court, does not find any patent illegality meriting interference. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Petitioner shall be at liberty to agitate all these aspects of the matter at the relevant stage of the proceeding. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)