IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 1263 of 1995 Between: B.Samueal S/o.B.Isaiah Rajendranagar, Hyderabad R/o.A.R.I. Quarters No.7-I30 Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 30 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University Rep. by its Registrar, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad (R1 dismissed for default vide CO dt.23/10/2000) 2 Labour Court No.III, Rep. by its Presiding Officer Chandravihar, Nampally, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order of direction calling for the records in Memo No.23940/Ser.III/85, dt.2/5/1990, of the Ist respondent, and (ii) I.D.no.220/93(new) (I.D.No.94/90 Old), Labour Court, III, Hyderabad, of the 2nd respondent and quash and set a side the same as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.V.ANAND RAO Counsel for respondent No.1: None appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This writ petition has been filed against the order of the Labour Court III, Hyderabad in I.D.No.220/93(new) and (old No. I.D.94/90) dated 11-7-1994 against the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, which is the 1st respondent in this writ petition. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hyderabad is the 2nd respondent. As against the 1st respondent, the writ petition was dismissed for default by order of this Court dated 23-10-2000. W.P.M.P.8800/05 filed to set aside the order of dismissal dated 23-10-2000 passed against the 1st respondent was also dismissed for default on 20-6-2005. The A.P. Agricultural University is the contesting respondent and the Presiding Officer, Labour Court III, second respondent, as held in catena of judgments, is not even a necessary party to this writ petition. Since the writ petition has been dismissed against the 1st respondent on 23-10-2000, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed against the 2nd respondent as well. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. __________ 11-7-2005 asp To : 1. Labour Court No.III, Chandravihar, Nampally, Hyderabad 2. Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Labour, High Court building, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. Two C.D. copies