IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.720 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: February 8, 2007 Chand Kumar ….Petitioner VERSUS Gurdashan Singh Gill ….Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL PRESENT: Shri Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). After arguing the case for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the matter is pending for a considerable period before the Rent Controller, therefore, the Rent Controller be directed to decide the ejectment petition expeditiously. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Rent Controller is directed to decide the ejectment petition within a period of one year from the date a certified copy of this order is received. A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. February 8, 2007 (Viney Mittal) KD Judge