IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2094 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.856 OF 2007 The CIT-3 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Akrosh Inv.& Leasing Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 4th March, 2008. PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 1074 days delay in filing the appeal. A perusal of affidavit-in-support indicates that the scrutiny report was received in the office of jurisdictional CIT on 25.2.2004 but the file was thereafter sent to a Counsel for drafting after more than 2 years & 12 months later on 22.12.2006. The delay caused between the aforesaid period has not been properly explained. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.856 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.856 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.856 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)