IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 25 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak ... Petitioner Aghadi V/s. The Security Guards Board for ... Respondent Greater Bombay & Ors. Mr. S. Mahadeshwar for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Topkar for the respondent No.1. Mr. V.P. Vaidya for the respondent No.2. Ms. Sonia D’Souza for the respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. : F.I. REBELLO, J. : F.I. REBELLO, J. ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. V. MOHTA, J. V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st March, 2006 : 21st March, 2006 : 21st March, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. On behalf of the respondents, the learned Counsel makes statement that they will apply for registration within two weeks from today. On such application, respondent No. 1 to consider the same and dispose it of the same within two weeks thereafter. 3. In so far as the guards, whose names are listed at Exhibit "A", it is the case of the petitioner that they have already applied for registration on 12th December, 2005. Respondent No. ( 2 ) 1 to consider the same and dispose of the application of registration within four weeks from today. 4. On guards registered, respondent No. 2 to register said guards as far as possible by respondent No. 1 to respondent No. 2. In the meantime, the services of the guards listed at Exhibit "A" shall be continued by respondent No. 2. 5. Rule made absolute. Petition disposed of with no order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]