IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12555 of 2009 Surya Deo Choudhary, son of Late Ram Sukul Choudhary, Resident of Village-Rajason, P.S. Bidupur, P.O.Rajason, District-Vaishali. ……………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union of India through Ministry of Railways,New Delhi. 2. The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur,District- Vaishali. 3. The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Eastern Central Railway, Hajipur, District-Vaishali. 4. The Divisional Security Commissioner, Eastern Central Railway, Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). 5. The Assistant Security Commissioner, East Central Railway, Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. 6. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway,Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. …….Respondents. ----------- 2. 16. 09. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of Respondent No.4 The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to revision of pensionery benefits on the basis of last pay drawn by him as indicated in pay slip contained in Annexure-4. It is submitted that petitioner’s monthly pension has been fixed taking last salary drawn as Rs. 4,600/- as it would appear from pension payment order as contained in Annexure-7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner represented the matter on 11th August, 2009 before Respondent No. 3, as contained in Annexure-10. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his 2 claim, he proposes to file a representation before Respondent No. 3 stating details of his claim. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievance of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be redressed without delay. With the above observations/directions, this writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)