IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1161 of 2011 VAKIL PASWAN, son of Ram Briksha Paswan Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.59 of 2010 registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C. Admittedly, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that the name of this petitioner came in this case in confessional statement of co-accused Uttam Paswan, and subsequently some witnesses have also stated about the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. It has, specifically, been pleaded by the petitioner at para-9 of this petition that the witnesses, whose statements have been recorded vide paragraph nos. 109, 110, 111 and 119, are not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence and they have stated nothing specific against the petitioner. The impugned order of 2 learned Sessions Judge does not disclose any criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, Vakil Paswan is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with above stated Bodhgaya P.S. Case No.59 of 2010. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)