W206 “ (Petition U/A 2 6 of Constitution of India) > [Single Bench; Hon’ble Mr Justice Dhirendra Mishra) 14.01.2009 Shri Ajay Kumar Bar Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy Heard. The petitioner was a pointed asAContingent Employee on the Collector Rate inthehyea‘ri 1989. After‘completion of three years, services of the petitioneriwere regularized‘and he was granted regular pay scale w.e.f 21.4.1992. However, subsequently this P WWKW) ' Kmwmam f ’WW WW l %avi1%nm r i k, counsel for the petitioner. Advocate General for the State. £7 PETITIONER Ud y Ram Koushale, S/o. Munna Ram Ko shale, aged about 39 years, working as Pe , Boys Higher Secondary School, Ja pur, District Jashpur (CG) Vs RESPONDENTS I. tate of Chhattisgarh, through the ecretary Department of Tribal Welfare, \ .K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur hhattisgarh 2. ollector, Aadim Jati Kalyan Branch, ashpur, Tehsil 85 District, Jashpur The then Raigarh) (CG) 3. ssistant Commissioner, Aadivasi Vikas ribal, Jashpur (The then Raigarh) (CG) 4. ommissioner, Aadivasi Vikas Raipur CG) i m \-”F."\.,‘ m m 260.” ‘ :7 . m W‘W(W) ' anéwmfaw awmm 2 _ Wmz§wm ,g *Mqfawm regular pay scale was wit drawn vide order of Annexure P-4 dated 4.10.1997. Learnéd counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is squarely cove ed by the order dated 18.1.2006 passed by this Court in the WP. 0.2125/ 02 between Sant Kumar & others Vs’. State of CG. & others, hich Was subsequently confirmed by the Division Bench of this Co rt vide order dated 23.3.2007 passed in Writ Appeal No.57/O7. T e petitioner is also entitled for similar benefit in terms of the or er passed in the matter of Sant Kurnar (supra) . The above fact is lot disputed by learned counsel for the State . In that View of the atter, the instant petition is disposed of and it is held that the pe itioner is also entitled for the benefits in terms of the order dated 18.1.2006 passed by this Court in the matter of Sant Kurnar 85 others (Supra). In case, the petitioner is not entitled for regular pay scale, the State is at liberty to take necessary steps in accordance with law, after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. ' Sdl- U: Dhirendra Mishra: Judge Certified copy as per rules. /