IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2009 / 5TH ASHADHA 1931 WA.No. 1258 of 2009 --------------- --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12650/2009 Dated 24/04/2009 .................... APPELLANT/6TH RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- M/S.TRICOTT MILS LTD.,NATTIKA, TRICHUR- 680566, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECATOR, C.RAJAN MENON. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. RAVINDRANATHAN,S/O.GOPI,ERNEZHATH VENGALI HOUSE, PENNGOTTUKARA, VADAKKUMMURIT, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT.OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 5. VILLAGE OFFICER, NATTIKA VILLAGE, NATTIKA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALAPPAD POLICE STATION, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. M.A.YUSAFALI, PROPRIETOR, M.K.GROUP, NATTIKA. R1 BY ADV.SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR R2 TO R6 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & Kurian Joseph, J. ------------------------------------------ W.A.No.1258 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 26th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. This writ appeal is filed by the 6th respondent in the writ petition being aggrieved by the order dated 24th April, 2009 and especially the observations of the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment and the Revenue Divisional Officer in Ext.P2 order regarding the alleged possession of the property in dispute. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that these observations will come in the way of Ext.P5 representation filed by the writ petitioner being independently considered by the revisional authority. 2. On a perusal of the writ petition and the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, we are of the view that W.A.No.1258 of 2009 - 2 - this writ appeal can be disposed of directing the revisional authority to dispose of Ext.P5 representation untrammeled by the observations and findings with regard to the possession of the disputed 10 cents of property as contained in Ext.P2 order and the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Ordered accordingly. Writ appeal is disposed of as above. S.R.Bannurmath, Chief Justice Kurian Joseph, Judge vns