IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2754 of 2008 Date of decision: May 13, 2008. Surinder Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Gurdial Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - (Oral): This Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 15.3.2007 passed by the learned Additional civil Judge (Senior Division), Patiala, whereby, on an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC moved by the respondent – plaintiffs, both the parties have been directed to maintain status quo; as well as against the order dated 25.1.2008 passed by the learned District Judge, Patiala dismissing the petitioner's appeal against the above mentioned order of the trial court. On a plain reading of the impugned orders passed by the courts below, it is apparent that the tentative opinion with regard to (i) prima-facie case; (ii) balance of convenience; and (iii) that in the event of non-grant of status quo, the respondent – plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss, has been formed by the courts below on the basis of material on record, including jamabandis for the year 1986-87, 1991-92, 1996-97. No interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is, therefore, called for. Dismissed. May 13, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge