WP(C) 2303/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. A. K. Hussain, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, and Ms. P. Cha kraborty, learned Standing counsel, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Assam, appearing on behalf of the State respondents. The petitioner herein, who was one of the applicants for appointment as Anganwadi worker at Murhadol Anganwadi Centre, under Naduar ICDS Project, in the district of Sonitpur, challenged the appointment of one Smt. Jyoti Borah as Ang anwadi worker at the said Anganwadi Centre, by way of filing a writ petition und er Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which gave rise to WP(C) 5194/2010, on the ground that the said Smt. Jyoti Borah (i.e., respondent No. 6 in the sai d writ petition) was not a resident of the area, where the said Anganwadi Centre is located. The writ petition was disposed of by an order, dated 15.11.2010, d irecting the respondent No. 2 in the said writ petition, namely, Director of Soc ial Welfare, Government of Assam, to examine the petitioner’s grievances and, af ter necessary enquiry, pass appropriate speaking order, on the issue, within a p eriod of two months. Learned counsel for the State respondents, by producing an order, dated 15.06.2011, passed by the Director, Social Welfare Department, Assam, submits th at pursuant to the directions, given by the Court, by order, dated 15.11.2010, i n WP(C) 5914/2010, aforementioned an enquiry has been conducted and an order has been issued, on 15.06.2011, in this regard, by the respondent No. 2, namely, Di rector, Social Welfare, Assam, which reflects that the enquiry has revealed that the petitioner’s allegation that the said Smt. Jyoti Borah was an outsider and that she could not have been appointed as Anganwadi worker at the Murhadol Angan wadi Centre, under Naduar ICDS Project. The respondent No. 2 accordingly direct ed the respondent No. 5, namely, Child Development Project Officer, Noduar ICDS Project, to terminate the appointment/service of the respondent No. 6, namely, S mt. Jyoti Borah, with immediate effect and to arrange for interview afresh for a ppointing Anganwadi worker at the said Anganwadi Centre. In view of the fact that the State respondents have already taken a deci sion to terminate the appointment/service of Smt. Jyoti Borah and also to arrang e for fresh interview, the petitioner, now, seeks to withdraw the present writ p etition with liberty approach this Court with appropriate application, in future , if so advised. Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest o f justice, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner, wit h liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Court with appropriate appli cation, in future, if so advised. A copy of the order, dated 15.06.2011, aforementioned, passed by the res pondent No. 2, namely, Director, Social Welfare Department, shall be kept with t he records of this writ petition. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned Standing counsel, Social Wel fare Department.