..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.788 OF 2007 Shri Rahul Kailas Landge. ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Ashwin Shete, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st April, 2007. DATED : 21st April, 2007. DATED : 21st April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.702 of Kothrud Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 376-G of IPC. 3. It is the case of the prosecutrix that five persons committed rape on her and the present applicant is one of the said persons. She has identified the present applicant in test identification parade. 4. The learned APP has stated that the trial in the present case is going on. The prosecutrix ..(2).. has been examined and now only five to six witnesses are remained to be examined. 5. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage. 6. Application is rejected. . Liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application in case the trial is not concluded by 30th June, 2007. . Office to issue authenticated copy of this order to the concerned parties. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)