C.W.P. No.3608 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.3608 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:31.03.2010 R.K. Oberoi son of Sh. Parmanand ........Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vidyut Sadan, Sector 6, Panchkula (Haryana) through its Chairman and another ....Respondents Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Praveen Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner states that against the punishment accorded to him and for some adverse entries entered in the ACR, he has preferred a statutory appeal. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that the consideration for promotion will be undertaken by 30.04.2010 and therefore, he would request that the statutory appeal and the representation against the adverse entries be decided before that date. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for the same. The writ petition is, therefore, C.W.P. No.3608 of 2010 (O&M) -2- ordered accordingly with the direction that the statutory appeal and the representation against the adverse entries be considered before 30.04.2010 and communicated to the petitioner. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 31, 2010 Pankaj*