IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 22028 of 2010(C) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SREEKESH J.SHENOY, KOTTARAM PURAYIDOM PARAYIL HOUSE, NEAR T.D.TEMPLE THAZHATHANGADI POST, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE PRESIDENT, THIRUMALA DEVASWOM THAZHATHANGADI POST, KOTTAYAM. R1 & 2 BY ADVS. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 22028/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE SKETCH. P2: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 07/10/1992 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE PETITION. P4: COPY OF THE TENDER NOTICE IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY. P5: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21/07/2004. P6: COPY OF THE TENDER NOTICE DATED 06/10/2004. P7: COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING. P8: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16/12/2005 IN O.P. NO.750/2005. P9: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15/03/2007 IN R.P. NO.5/2006. P10: COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 28/06/2008. P10(a):COPY OF THE SKETCH. P10(b):COPY OF THE REGISTER. P11: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05/02/2007. P12: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20/11/2008. P13: COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 06/03/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.22028 of 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of September 2011. JUDGMENT Heard the counsel for the petitioner, Standing counsel for the respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.3. 2. The writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the 2nd respondent to take follow up action pursuant to Ext.P13 petition so as to ensure that the repair works of Parayil lane in ward No.2.of Kottayam Municipality is completed without any further delay and commanding the 2nd respondent to dispose of Ext.P13 petition and for other incidental reliefs. 3. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, in the admission list, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P13 petition is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent and requests this Court to issue appropriate orders directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P13 W.P.(C) No.22028/2010 2 petition within a time frame. 4. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P13 petition within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE al