1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1028 OF 2006 Mohammed Ismail Mohd. Yaseen and Anr. .. Petitioners. Vs. Sanjay Shankar Shewale & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.A.R.Shaikh for the petitioners. Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 26TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 26TH JUNE, 2006 DATED : 26TH JUNE, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of criminal complaint No.270 of 2005 filed by the respondent-complainant under sections 420, 468, 471, 120B, 201, 466 read with 34 of the I.P.C. In the said complaint the learned Magistrate vide order dated 14.6.2005 has directed the investigation under section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Pending investigation and report to be filed under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have preferred criminal revision application challenging the said order dated 14.6.2005 passed by the learned Magistrate. In my opinion, this petition is premature. The petitioner will have remedies after 2 2 2 filing of the report under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Reserving such remedies, to be adopted at appropriate stage before the appropriate forum, to the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as premature. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)