IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11645 of 2008 RANJAN KUMAR, Son of Surendra Prasad at present H.N.165/2, P & T Colony, Telephone Department, P. S. Budha Colony, District-Patna. ....Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Herolal Barnwal, S/O Prabhu Prasad, resident of Village- Dhoom Nagar, P.S. Sikarpur, District- West Champaran....Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 05.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the present application, the order of cognizance dated 09.01.2006 passed in complaint case no. 1095C of 2005 has been challenged whereby the cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 420, 468, 467/34 of the Indian Penal code. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that after perusing the record, the order of cognizance has been passed. Moreover, the order of cognizance is dated 09.01.2006 and there is nothing on record to suggest the present stage of the trial, hence, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The application is dismissed. However, the petitioner may raise all his contentions at the time of framing of charges if the charges have already not been framed. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)