IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR '51hg?nS ie K^ Writ Petition No. S>^° _of_2Q06_. In the matter of section 2(x) of theChhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 And In the matter of section 70 (1) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 • And In the matterof section 71 (3) of the Chhattisgarh Commercial Tax Act. 1994 And In the matter ofan application underArticles 226/227 ofthe constitution of India. And In the matter of :- Petitioner Resoondents ,<-^' r.-T'^E-' 'A/ .rs.- ^ / M/s. Raipur Ferro Alloys (Pvt) Ltd., Urla Industrial area, Raipur (C.G.) Through Director Ramanand Agrawal S/o.Late Manoharlal Agrawal, Aged about 71 years, R/o. Udya Griha Nirm.an Society, Tati bandh, Raipur (C.G.) Versus i* 1. Board of Revenue (Commerciai Tax Tribunal) through secretary, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ .^^-i.!- !t! -":1 :;y 2. Commissioner of' ^!"'--' Commercial Tax / Vanijyik Kar Bhavan Civil ? • lines Raipur(C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh , through secretary <£"' Department of Commercial %'-Tax ^DKS Mantralaya Bhavafn-Raip.yr (g.G.) Before:- Hon'blo the Chief Jystice^and his cpmpanion judges of the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature Chhattisgarh at Bilasour. * • • Petition underArticles 226/227 of the constitution oflndia forjssuance of suitable direetion'; orders or writs incluai.Ta writs in the nature of ^.ft:. mandamus'!certicr;in etc.:- ,* T XI-HC—7S sn^iw k-fi* TOT eflI^T s(l4i<* Rsju ^. ^ \-f ^~sf ^ww^, w-^ww, fcfdiyy'i. _^.:s.^....^^.l^ 31I^?T TT5Ri' (^fS^!) ©) Wiiw^fesn^i Neelabh Dubev. i.P.S. Bhatia, D ANo.7373 of2006 |counseS fcr the petitioner. ^puty Govemment Advocate for the State. This is an appiicatiorl The aopfication is ord On the requestof 14arned counsel . one wsek time is granted tlf> make good the office, faiiing which the Drosecution without refsren ^l^^ll ^WV\\ ^f fe^ <R>i^i< ^7 .sfifw sntw fortaking documents on record. lered as prayed for ig for the petitioner, as pointed out &y the betition shalt stand dismissed for want of be to the Benoh. Sarish K. Agnihotri Judge l* 1 T TST •<<l'LI!M'4,®Tft<H416,fs|ivll^lj,< *11*1CTI a»Niq> ••^200 3TI^?[ 'VW (l?^'"^) wAw w ft-ii* <TO sn^i *'<i+ +iiffi4-< i<iicii 4 'fe^t <rfl«,i< ^siRpTan^i 16/01/2009 .'.^'r-f^ In view of the report dated 15/01/2009 submitted by the office, this W.P. No. 3910/2006 is treated as dismissed for non compliance of Hon'ble Court order dated 19/11/2008. (For detail note sheet part may kindly be seen). Counsel accordingly. be ^"x infomied __!....,.— Sd/- A. R. (Judl.) S. O. W.P.-) yjiy^if ^s^f ggCTn^r, —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000.