IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. Writ Petition No3§€2312006 Petitioner v; $90““5&3 ' $§N§§E $E§§$§Y 3v“ ”V . M / Bodhan Singh Thakui— S/o Late Shri Banmali Singh Thakur abed about 64 Years, Retired Head Master (Education Department) R/o Phooljharia para Sarangarh Tahsil- Sarangar Distt.— .. espondents : /1. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICAL 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ORDER AND DIRECTION ETC. e , V (C.G.) Versus The State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary School Edncation Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasuries , Account & i Pension Bilaspur Division Bilaspur (C.G.) District Treasury Officer / District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Development Education Officer, Tahsil— Sarangarh, Distt.— SarangermCG.) / R XI—HC—78 MW, WW,W . Wyfzw..3giw:s. m 200g 2 as WW (W) WWW WWW%‘WWR mwm ' mmm ‘ éawm 17-7-2006 Shri Sameer Behar, ccunsel §or the petitioner. Shri $atish Gupta, Depuy Gavt. Advocate far ihe State! respondents, 0n advance copy. Heard both the couiwsel, By the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the {espondente not to deduct the amount as mentioned in the impugned order Annexure-Pl’i and it hae hither been erayed that the order Annexure-PH be quashed, The case of the petitioner is that he was working as Head Master at Government Middie School, Navm, Tehsii Saranggarh, District Raigarh and he demitted the oftice on attaining the age of superannuation on 30‘“ April 2004. Thereafter, aii of a euc den, without seeking any explanation or informing the petitioner, the order Annexure—P/‘l was passed by respondent Deputy Director (Pens on) by which it has been shown that an amount of Rs.1,51 ,161/~ has been paid in excess to the petitioner and same is liabie to be deducted from tte pension of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that without giving any opportunity to the petitioner and ‘ithout seeking any expianation as to how that amount is outstanding'against the petitioner and how the petitioner has drawn excess am unt, respondents, ail of a sudden, passed the impugned ordert From the petition, it appear that the petitioner against this order has not raised any objection to th concerned authority and asked for atiowing him to represent against th otder. ln the circumstances, couns l for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to respondent No2 i P.T.O. XI—HC—78 EW,WW,%W Wm .ooo.‘oo¢~... . H? 200 WW(‘EW) u W," igg ¢