IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO : 17052 of 2008 Between: V. Kiran Kumar S/o. V. Suguna Rao R/o.H.No.5-11-175, New Shanthi nagar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its (Prl) Secretary, General Administration (Ser.D) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission rep. by its Secretary, Gaganvihar, Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to call for the records relating to the O.A.No.6332 of 2008 on the ﬁle of the A.P. Admn. Tribunal, Hyderabad and declare that the petitioner is entitled for reservation even in the preliminary examination conducted on 20.04.2008 in pursuance to the notiﬁcation No.31/07 dated 27.12.2007 on the ﬁle of the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the further selection process including the main examination scheduled to be conducted from 07-08-2008 or at any subsequent date by holding the action of the 2nd respondent in not following the reservation for Physically Handicapped Candidates as illegal and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.VENKAT RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Writ Petition No.17052 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) Sri P.Shashikiran, Advocate, representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition had become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ________________________ G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J. 10-09-2008 Bsc