IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12098 of 2008 Most.Sheela Devi , wife of Late Sadan Singh, resident of Village- Bishunpura, P.O. Bishunpura, P.S. Bihta, District-Patna ---Petitioner Versus 1. Sugar Mill,Bihta , Bihta, through its Managing Director, District- Patna 2. The Managing Director, Sugar Mill, Bihta, Patna 3. The General Manager, Sugar Mill, Patna 4. Labour Officer, Sugar Mill, Bihta,Patna 5. Labour Secretary, Sugar Mill, Bihta,Patna -------------------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02 14-11-2011 Heard Sri Viveka Nand Kumar, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Dhirendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sujata Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.1 to 3/ Sugar Mill, Bihta,Patna . The present writ petition was filed in the year 2008 with a prayer to direct the Respondents to fix her family pension and also pay the arrear of salary of her husband, who was class-IV employee i.e. Guard in Sugar Mill, Bihta, Patna. The husband of the petitioner died on 12.06.2007. In this case, no counter affidavit has been filed till date, whereas copy of the writ petition was served on learned counsel for the Respondent nos.1 and 2 before filing of the writ petition. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.3/ General Manager, Sugar Mill,Patna. Smt. Sujata Mukherjee, learned counsel for the 2 Respondents has not opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.3 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he may take steps for clearing the dues of the petitioner within the aforesaid period. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)