IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 4896 of 2009 Between: Ch. Venkateswarlu S/o. Chauta Daveedu Constable (General Duty) aged 36 yrs, CRPF Employee (Under Suspension) R/o. H.No. 50-B , Type-1, Group Centre, CRPF Camp, Hakimpet Post, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of India, Rep by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi 0 110 001. 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. 4 The Inspector General of Police, Southern Sector, CRPF, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 5 The CRPF DIGP (Non IPS) Group Centre, CRPF, Ranga Reddy, Hakimpet Post, Secunderabad 500 087 (A.P.) 6 Mr. Dislahad Ali Assistant Commandant, Group Center, CRPF, Ranga Reddy, Hakimpet, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the unlawful illegal, and discriminatory action of the 6th Respondent for not providing the copies of the documents to the petitioner in accordance to his representation dt. 27-2-2009 in connection with the alleged Preliminary Enquiry contemplated against him vide 6th Respondent Letter No. P.VIII-4/2009-DA dt. 25-2-2009 into the incident dt. 23-1-2008 in which "it has been reported that Petition along with Constable/Mochi Satya Prakash were found using filthy language against all senior officers and also stated that we are in collaborate with Naxalites to see the end of Senior Officers of Group Center CRPF, Ranga Reddy Camp " as arbitrary unjust and illegal, and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. NARINDER PAL SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.4896 of 2009 ORDER: At the stage of admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 13th March, 2009. skmr