^•^:^Ei^ BEFORE THE HQN'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR IN THE MATTER OF W.P.N03/(£30F2006 M/s K.N.Oil Industries Ltd., Mahasamund Through Director.Shri.D.C.Jain, Mahasamund (C.G) PETITIONER VERSUS 1 .Banmali Yadav / s/o Ravichanda Yadav Nayapara ward no:7, Distt: Mahasamund 2.The Controlling Authority, Payment of Gratuity Act, Office ofAssistant Labour Commissioner, Raipur,(C.G) 3.The Appellate Authority, Payment ofGratuity Act, Office of Deputy Labour Commissioner, Avanti Vihar, Raipur (C.G) . ^Collector, [ahasamund, ffice ofthe Collector, lohari' Bhata, [ahasamund (C.G) 5 .Tehsildar, Office ofthe Tehsildar, J^il Lines, /»Q>lahasamund. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT . <WB81 ^' MIC'IS-i rTil IRT np nMI-IATTIfirSARI-l • Ril&RPS I! i~i?^3a 'i-/Wijf\ i ^T ^^r'ar'iM. ^ i lOv^ftr^r^ , os WRIT PETITION N0. —'3/^if' y\ PETiTiONEF M/'s K..N. Oil Industries Ltd. Versus ianmaii Yi f'^-j sv & Othe fWrit Petition under Artlcie 228/227 of [he Constitution of indii %iSinaie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Affnihotri, J. Present:- -None ror the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaauri, Panel Lawyer forthe Stati ORDER fORALi (Passed on this 25ti1 day of March, 2010) The matter is caiied for hearing tv/ice. On both occssions, none apDears nor is anv lyi) >ade on behaif of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in ths matter 2) fn view or the above, the writ Detition is dismissed for want of prQsecution. Consequentiy, interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Sd/- Sarish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri