IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9864 of 2004 DEO KUMAR SHARMA, SON OF SHRI RAM NATH SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAKHNARI, P.O. AND P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 3. THE PANCHAYATI RAJ PADADHIKARI, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATI0N, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SHEOSAGAR, P.O. AND P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS. 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXPENSION OFFICER, SHEOSAGAR, P.O. AND P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS 7. THE MUKHIYA, PANCHAYAT SHEOSAGAR, P.O. AND P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS 8. THE PANCHAYAT SEWAK, SHEOSAGAR, P.O. AND P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS 9. RAM CHANDRA SINGH, SON OF SHRI SUDARSHAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAKHANASI, P.O. AND P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT ROHTAS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RESPONDENTS ******** 6 8.12.2010 The petitioner has filed this writ application challenging the appointment of Ram Chandra Singh, S/o Sri Sudarshan Singh who has been appointed as Lok Shikshak. The petitioner has further stated that he is entitled for the appointment as he was duly qualified. Now there is no such post as Lok Shikshak and appointments have been made firstly to the post of Shiksha Mitra which has now been replaced by appointment of Panchayat Teachers. Whether respondent no. 9 is legally or illegally appointed is a question which has to be decided by the 2 concerned authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed a letter numbered as 202 dated 21.2.2005 which has purportedly been passed in compliance of an order of this Court. In that letter it appears that the Mukhiya and the Panchayat Secretary of village Pakhanasi, P.O and P.S. Sheosagar, District Rohtas have been asked to show cause as to why they have made appointments without following the procedure laid down under the law. I find that this Court cannot pass any order with respect to the appointment of the petitioner. However, it would be open for the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram to examine the appointment of Ram Chandra Singh, S/o Shri Sudarshan Singh if he is still working on the said post. This writ application is thus, dismissed, with the aforesaid observation. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)