1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Habeas Corpus Petition (MD) No.499 of 2011 J.Sasikumar ..Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Oomatchikulam, Madurai. 2.Mr.Durairaj 4.Mrs.D.Prasanna, W/o.Durairaj .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person and body of detenue, namely Pavithra, aged about 23 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For Respondents :Mr.C.Ramesh, 1 & 2 Addl.Public Prosecutor. For Respondent-4 : Mr.T.Selvakumarn O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by P.JYOTHIMANI,J) The petitioner, on the allegation that he lived with the detenue Pavithra, aged about 23 years, and thereafter their marriage was arranged and before the marriage could take place on 29.06.2011, the 3rd and 4th respondents, who are said to be the husband of the maternal aunt of the detenue and her maternal aunt, respectively, have taken away the detenue in order to prevent their marriage, has filed this habeas corpus petition for a direction to the respondent police to produce the detenue Pavithra before this Court. 2.Today, the 4th respondent, along with her husband, the 3rd respondent, is present before this Court. The detenue https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Pavithra was also produced before this Court. The petitioner is also present before this Court. We have enquired the detenue. She, in categorical terms, stated in the very presence of the petitioner J.Sasikumar that she does not know who is the said Sasikumar, even though the petitioner's case is that they were living together. In such view of the matter, taking note of the fact that the detenue is a major, aged about 23 years and recording the statement of the detenue, this habeas corpus petition is closed. 3.Learned counsel for the 4th respondent would submit that the petitioner is causing nuisance to the 3rd and 4th respondents by making telephonic calls. The petitioner J.Sasikumar undertakes that hereafter he would not do so. It is is made clear that in the event of such nuisance from the petitioner, the 3rd and 4th respondents can approach the appropriate authorities for redressal of their grievance. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Oomatchikulam Police Station, Oomatchikulam, Madurai. Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan, Advocate, Sr.No.21927 +1cc to Mr.T.Selvakumarn, Advocate, Sr.No.22045 Order in HCP(MD)No.499/2011 Dated:06.07.2011 gb SMA/15.7.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/