IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9975 of 2009 BIRENDRA NUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. From the antecedent report it emerges that there are 11 cases of similar kind pending against the petitioner. He has long history of crime behind him and even in this case also the evidence has come against him. In that view of the matter, he cannot be given any further indulgence to be released on bail. His prayer for bail is rejected. It is a fit case where the trial of the petitioner should be expedited. If the trial is not concluded within the next one year, the petitioner has liberty to renew his prayer. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)