Court No.3 Criminal Revision No. 50/2003 Narayan Mishra …..Revisionist. Versus Urmila Mishra ….. Respondent. Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. This is a revision against the interlocutory order dated 21-3-2003 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court Dehradun and in view of the provision of section 19 sub section (2) and (4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the revision is not maintainable against the interlocutory order. Moreover the order was passed by the consent of the parties in regard to the quantum of the interim maintenance. Considering this the revision petition is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. It was pointed out that the application under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code was filed by the respondent-wife on 26-11-2001 although maintenance has been awarded from 1.2.2001. Considering this anomaly in the interest of justice a modification in the date of the order from which the maintenance is to be paid may be made. The petitioner shall be liable to pay the maintenance per order dated 21-3-2003 with effect from 26-11- 2001. Considering this hardship in the payment of the arrears of the maintenance by the petitioner who is a retired army personnel the facility of payment of the arrears of maintenance in instalment may also be provided. The petitioner shall pay the arrears of maintenance in monthly instalment of Rs. 200-00 per month. However monthly payment shall be made in the first week of coming month. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated: 5-9-2003 ISB