1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3885/2011 [Murlidhar Hanumandas Agarwal .vrs. Central Bank of India, Khamgaon and others] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 10, 2011. Heard Shri H.R. Gadhia, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is apparent that Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) passed orders on application under section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and directed the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.3,00,000/-. That amount was not deposited even during extended time. Ultimately, the appeal came to be dismissed for want of that deposit. Those orders passed in 2009 are being questioned before this Court only after auction notice has been published by respondent no.1 – Bank. The delay and laches are not explained properly and our 2 attention has been invited to paragraph 5 of the petition, which only shows conscious decision taken not to approach this Court challenging those orders. We, therefore, are not inclined to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande