AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3226 OF 2009 Mrs. Nanki Chellaram Chellani ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. N.R. Bubna for the petitioner. Mr. P.A. Pol, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. A.V. Doijode and Ms. Ruchita Dhru for the original complainant. Mr. D.A. Nalawade with Mr. Mandar Goswami for respondent 5. CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.:- 1. In this petition, it is inter alia prayed that respondents 3 and 4 should direct production of petitioner’s grandson Mr. Mahesh Dua in the court. We are informed that Mr. AJN 2 Mahesh Dua is not in police custody. He is wanted in C.R. No.214 of 2009 of Mahim Police Station. In fact, some other person has made anticipatory bail application on his behalf, which is pending in the Sessions Court at Bombay. Therefore, prayer for production of Mr. Mahesh Dua does not survive. 2. There are several allegations made against the police particularly respondent 3, the Inspector of Police, Mahim Police Station. The petitioners seek an order directing the Commissioner of Police to start inquiry against respondent 3. We are informed that respondent 3 was suspended and inquiry was conducted. However, the inquiry was closed and the period of inquiry has been treated as duty period. If the petitioner has any more grievances, he can approach the appropriate authority in the Police Department, if he so desires. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on this aspect. After hearing learned counsel and after reading the affidavit in reply, we are, however, of the confirmed opinion that this petition is an attempt to AJN 3 pressurize the police. Such attempt cannot be allowed to succeed. 3. The petition is dismissed. [MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]