IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33072 of 2010 2 9.9.2010 Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar, S/o Shambhu Yadav, R/v- Mahammadganj, P.S. Chhatapur, Distt. Supaul VERSUS The State of Bihar ------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Name of the petitioner has transpired as one of the accused in course of investigation and in the FIR only one Birendra Yadav was named as accused along with three unknown persons. Anticipatory bail has been claimed on the aforesaid facts and on the ground that other co-accused persons who named the petitioner in their statement before the police have been allowed bail and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. There is no material to support the defence of false implication by co-accused on account of enmity. Considering the aforesaid facts, it is not deemed proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular - 2 - bail on all the grounds available to him including the ground that other co-accused have been allowed bail. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)