IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2011 / 21ST ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18780 of 2011(V) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. K.A. HAMEED, S/O. ABDULLAKUNHI, KAMBAR HOUSE, PUTHUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. K.P. MOHAMMEDKUNHI, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. POKER, KAMBAR HOUSE, PUTHUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER, SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD - 671 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KASARAGOD - 671 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.18780/2011 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER WITHOUT THE PLAN SUBMITTED TO THE TAHSILDAR, KASARAGOD. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LAND GIVEN BY THE FIRST PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LAND GIVEN BY THE SECOND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18780 of 2011- V ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners claim to be in possession of 18 cents of land situated in R.S.No.246/1 of Mogral in Puthur Village of Kasaragod District. According to the petitioners, they made Exts. P2 and P3 applications before the 2nd respondent seeking assignment of the said properties. These applications are pending. In this writ petition, what sought for is a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the said applications and pass orders thereon. 2. Taking note of the case of the petitioners regarding the pendency of Exts.P2 and P3 applications before the 2nd respondent, I direct that on production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition, the 2nd respondent shall consider Exts.P2 and P3 applications and pass orders thereon. -2- W.P.(C) 18780/2011 3. This the 2nd respondent shall do, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. In the meanwhile, status quo as on date shall be maintained. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rka -3- W.P.(C) 18780/2011