^ •./ •f~^\ <r INLTmE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATHSGARH WMT^»ETITIONN0. ^^^72006 PETITIONER 1. ../y. J^^/ ^t?/ ^^AS:^" ^ ^y/ ^ ^" ^ i??" ../ £.. /'^5(!f^ RESPONDENTS 1. A ^^ ^ 2 ^9\[^^ ^"'^^' 1 &• ^ / "'<{'• , •'.-' ..^ Chandra Shekhar Singh, S/0. Shri Rambachan Singh, aged about - 49 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Modem (T.W.D.) Higher Secondary School Baikunthpur Distt. Korea (C.G.) Ramashanker Sahu, S/0. Shri Haldhar Sahu, aged about - 41 years. Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Boys Meddle School Domanhill. Tehsil - Manendragarh Block - Khadgava, Distt. Korea (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur (C.G.) ,A Commissioner Public Insto-uction Raipur (C.G.) in © •; WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (*• XI-HC-78 s^'-^iraRW, aTflu'KB, Ricii<^y HIK^I s,k*4ich VJ- ?-^e- •1•°?(<^r^ 200 4 OT^TMStch (lcl'dGI<<.<T) fc ERT R-li* (T8TT 3n^T ^W^) (-T- ^aTwnf^cran^r .^:^s peri<jd 14-8-2006 Shri Anil Singh Rajput, coun{ Shrt Satish Gupta, Dep^ty respondents, on advance copy. Heard. The petitioners who are 1994 have preferred this writ Constitution of tndia with a praye|r allow Dearness Allowance and H4 as has been granted to the similariyl The case of the petitioners i^ Upper Division Teachers by the er^ year 1994 on probation for a two years period their services Allowance and House Rent Allowahce years probation period has also nof Division Teachers who were appo| State Administrative Tribunal by fi) and the same was decided on directed to pay regular pay scale admissible increments. The otherl Department and they have also gave a direction to consider the] Teachers in W. P. No.1890/2003. Learned counsel for the petiti ^ie allowed to make a representa^ion treatment to the petitioners and t| <oi<<fci41'] HiiciT if te^t (RRZR ^stf^R'sn^r ^el for the petitioners. Govt. Advocate for the State/ U()per Division Teachers working since rtetition under Article 226/227 of the that the respondents be directed to (use Rent Allowance to the petitioners [situated persons. i^ that the petitioners were appointed as ^twhile State of Madhya Pradesh in the of two years and after completion of ]were regularized, but, the Dearness are not being paid to them and two teken as a regular period. The Upper |nted in the year 1994 approached the jing Original ApplicaSon No.1452/1998 131-1-2000 and the Government was ]during the probaUon period and other Iteachers made a representation to the given the benefit, This Court also representation of the Upper Division bten toners submits that the petitioners may to the respondents to give similar ie same pay spale which have been P.T.O. ^•^^ ?<:••- / XI-HC-78 ssr^iraraq', sTfl+i'is, [siciiyy *II+1MI 8>Wh W^ 200 3^1^1 4d* (l^3^?T) bT^TR-li+ ^TI^Tsbliti Barve SRITW flf?cT-W^T -^A situated sanctioned to other similariy the State Administrative Tribunal learned counsel for the State/respoijidents - Having heard learned coun^ facts and cireumstances of the ca^< on the merit of the case, the lintited petitioners appears to be just, petitioners are allowed to make a| No.2 annexing a copy of this writ| from today and in turn, respondent| the petitioners within a period of tw|3 an objective manner, considering petitioners, on its own merit and pa^i With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certifi^d sbi'iiFri'lfl-i *iiiflTffte(^t<Ri't<;i< ^sriwrsn^T teachers on account of the order of vide order dated 31-1-2000 to which has no objection. •e! for the parties, having regard to the >e, and without expressing any opinion prayer made by counsel for the air and reasonable. Therefore, the detailed representation to respondent petition within a period of two weeks |No.2 shall decide the representation of months from the date of its receipt, in ^nd examining the points raised by the |s appropriate order. (he petition stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. L.C; Judge P.T.O. /