GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2483 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 2483 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 2483 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6158 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 6158 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 6158 OF 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Pandey for M.P.Vashi & Associates for the petitioner. Shri M.V.Gopalkrishnan for Respondent no.1. Shri R.M.Patne AGP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 9TH MARCH, 2005 9TH MARCH, 2005 9TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this application, the applicant seeks restoration of his writ petition No.6158/02. It was dismissed by a conditional order granting the petitioner four weeks to remove office objections. Inspite of that grant of time, nothing was done. Now four more weeks are claimed after restoration. It will be seen that the objections were such which could be removed within one day. It was not done for two years. In such circumstances the petitioner is not entitled to any more indulgence. C.A. rejected. ....