1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 200 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4002/2000 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 33 OF 2002 (Decided) (Pradeep Shankarrao Kherede Vs. Vidya Vikas Vihar Society & 2 ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATED : 23 rd MARCH, 2009. It appears that the counsel for both the sides were absent when the petition came up for hearing before the Court on 11th of November, 2008. This Court observed in the order dated 11th of November, 2008 that earlier Shri Pathak, the learned counsel for the respondents resisted the order proposing to dismiss the contempt petition in default, as he had filed C.A. No. 6998/2008 for directions. This Court further observed that though Shri Pathak was asked to elaborate the pleadings in the application properly, nothing had been done by him till 11th of November, 2008, and he was also not present before the Court on that date. In order to give one more chance, the contempt petition was 2 adjourned as a last chance. The matter was thereafter adjourned at the request of Shri Pathak, on 25/11/2008. None appears on behalf of the respondents except Shri Sonak, the learned A.G.P. who appears on behalf of the respondent no.3. The counsel for the petitioner is also absent. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE RMP