1 criapln1500-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1500 OF 2011 1] Sindhubai Shivajirao Joshi 2] Satish Shivajirao Joshi 3] Sangita w/o Satish Joshi/ .. APPLICANTS Vs 1] The State of Maha. 2] The Police Inspector 3] Rupali Mahesh Bulbule .. RESPONDENETS ... Shri Ram S. Shinde Borolkar,Adv. for applicants. Shri N.H.Borade,APP for R-State. Shri M.D.Narwadkar,Adv.for R.3. ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 20/06/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.07/2011 registered with Wadhwana [Bk] police station, Dist.Latur for offences punishable under Sections 376, 498-A, 323, 504, 506 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. Charge sheet is filed in this case. A.P.P. is ready with the copy of 2 criapln1500-11 charge sheet. Advocate is appointed by original complainant to assist the A.P.P. Heard both sides. 2] The complainant was given in marriage to Mahesh Bulbule in the year 2008. She has made allegations against husband and relatives that ill treatment was given to her by them on the ground of non-payment of dowry etc. She has made allegations that she could not conceive and so on that count also, ill treatment was given to her. She has contended that the husband and his relatives then sent her to one Kiran Joshi who, according to her is a Tantrik, to help them to get a child. She has made allegations against Kiran Joshi that by administering some liquid, he made her unconscious and he raped her in his house. She has made allegations that Kiran Joshi raped her on many occasions in similar manner. She has contended that she did not disclose about these incidents to her parents. 3] The applicant no.1 is mother of said Kiran Joshi, applicant no.2 is brother and applicant no.3 is wife of applicant no.2. Allegations against them are that they encouraged and helped Kiran Joshi in aforesaid acts. Advocate of the applicants pointed out some portion of F.I.R. to show that complainant was kept by Kiran Joshi at separate place, and on one occasion, she was kept in lodge also. Advocate has submitted that the wife of Kiran Joshi had grievance against relationship between Kiran Joshi and complainant and she had even 3 criapln1500-11 made complaint to Mahila Takrar Nivaran Kendra. He submitted that due to this dispute, the report is given against the applicants. He has submitted that the applicants were also against this relationship. However, no record is produced and the contentions are supported only in affidavit. 4] The record shows that the report was given very late. Allegations against applicants are that they encouraged and helped Kiran Joshi in aforesaid acts. It was submitted that Kiran Joshi is already released on bail. In view of the nature of the offence, nothing can be achieved due to the arrest of the applicants. Custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary. So, interim relief given in favour of the applicants is confirmed and the application is allowed. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln1500-11