1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER Union of India & Ors. Vs. Veer Singh (S.B. Civil Regular First Appeal No.28/2010) Date of Order :- April 30, 2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.CHAUHAN Mr.V.S. Gurjar, for the appellants. Ma.Anita Agrawal, for the respondent. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.08.2009, passed by the District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.3, Ajmer, Camp Kishangarh, whereby the learned Judge has decreed the suit for eviction and recovery of rent, the appellants have approached this Court. During the pendency of this appeal, this Court had suggested that the appellants should vacate the premises in dispute. Upon the suggestion of the Court, on three different occasions, time was sought by the learned counsel for the appellants to seek instructions from the appellants. Mr. V.S. Gurjar, the learned counsel for the appellants, states that although this Court had suggested that the premises be vacated by December, 2010, the appellants are willing to vacate the premises by March, 2011. However, the proposal made by the appellants has been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent. 2 This Court is of the view that the State should not only act as a model employer, but should also act as a model tenant. Therefore, once a landlord requests the tenant to vacate the premises, the State as the tenant should do so immediately. A time duration of eight months is more than sufficient for the appellants to locate an alternative accommodation for the Post- Office. Therefore, this Court directs the appellants to vacate the premises by December 31, 2010. With these observation, the appeal is, hereby, disposed of. (R.S.CHAUHAN)J. Manoj Solanki-