^p-}^ m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BHASFUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.No.4^/^2006 PE riTIONER •a,' \p .^^ t, ...• 1 c^^.'" ^•^•o»y ^s"^w" /^::y ^y/"' ^e'..--"" ia6?y^]>NDENT -^.— Smt. K.L.S. Caimal aged.b.bout 53 years. W/0. Shri K.G.S. aaitiial A.N.M. K.G. Hospital Raigarh,| R/0. Bus Depo Road, ^aigarh (G.G.) VERSUS 1. State pf Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary Health Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The'Chief Medical and Healtji Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 1 <^'3. The Director, Medical 4nd Health Department, Raipur (C'.G.) r' WUILraWITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OirjNDIA POR ISSUE OF AN APPROPMATE WRIT IN NATURE OF :ldANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKEJIATURE. Xl-HC-78 tnMpii a)»ii<*> 3'S? •^WIi-l^, ®T{1*<'IS,Rtfliyy —8^>;...y.fe!.v.?.^... *»* • * *l*lr* ^ ••'•* *T* • * ^ 200 3T1^?TV^K (^qfg^W) sn^TgirR-fi'* (WSIT^TSitTR; -)<«- STarmHfNan^T 30-8-2006 Mr. A.K. Athaley, counsel fic Mr. Vinay Pandey, Pan|s advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition| India, the petitioner has chailf (Annexure P-1) passed by r^; transferred from District Hospitell (Sarangarh). The case of the petitione) Midwife in the Public Health Raigarh. Main grievance of the rt petitioner has under gone some ^] >r. The petitioner requireet 19-8-2006, the petitioner has has advised to'undergo either and In the drcumstances, lear the petitioner may be allowec respondent No.1 raising all her g| to decide the same to which respondents has no objection. Having heard learned coi facts and cireumstances of the c^ merite of the case, the petitioner raising all her grievances ann< annexures to respondent No.1 v» qiiqfa^T ITTIRTt'ft'feiA <^RCTt ^sTf^crsn^r rthepetitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of ^nged her transfer order dated 7-7-2006 ^spondent No.2, whereby she has been I, Raigarh to Primary Health Centre, Him is that she is working as Anciliary Nurse iepartment and posted at K.G. Hospitaf, )|etitioner raised in this writ petition is that the leart problem and Trade Mill test was done. ifetime emergency medical treatment. On siffered heart problem again and the doctor ioplasty o.r bypass surgery. tied counsel for the petitioner submits that to make a detailed representation to rievances and respondent No.1 be directed |eamed counsel appearing for the State/ |nsel for the parties, having regard to the ^se and v/ithout expressing any opinion on ^ allov/ed to make a detailed representation i|xing a copy of the writ petition and its /fthin ten days from today and respondent P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^r^rfiFTRT (ISfTSTI^Tstili* :>.<.'-» Soma < ^ /^ <> T5? •^11<<1<-1<<, tttfl^'16, Rrtltfy HI*IMI awrai ^^.^^200^ 3n^?rva^ (yfl^si^ff) B?(TRKnf?(T3TT^r 2_ No.1 is directed to decide the of its receipt after considering objective manner, in accordance With the direction aforesail Consequently, M.(W.)P.N4 Parties are entitled for certl ^irafa^r wRTif ff fecfl-risresre ^STf^ITSn^T rebresentation within one month from the date |the points raised by the petitioner, in an (fl/ith law. (J, the petition stands disposed of. ^.3563/2006 also stands disposed of. :|fied copy of this order. Sd/- P.T.O.