M |i8 IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RTTASPUR W.P.227 N0. 3 0 ^2009 PETITIONER ^liance General. Insurance Company Umited, Through Branch Manager, Branch -office Krishna CompTex^ Kutcheiy Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur (C.oJ VERSUS chandabai w/o Bedram Satnami, aged about 35 years, R/o Ameri, Thana dvil Lmes, Tahsil & District Bilaspur"(C~.G^ {Claimant} x - v -. -./ Shiv^ Kumar Mahilang S/o Banawari Mahil,ang' R/o Padav" Para, MungeH; Tahsil Mungeli , District Bilaspur ~/C°G"i fDriver} sbdul Karim s/o shri Abdul Goffar, R/o Bada Bazar, Mungeli, Tahsil-Munseli/ District Bilaspur (C.G.) {Qwneri "-0"' ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ART»n,F227 OP pn»—^ ^ ;^^ The petitioner most humbly begs to submit as under:- RESPONDENTS v:x-/ ^ ^ ,.-y ^y' 1) §T ^^ ^ 3) ^i^i'^r'^te ^T ^lit^lWWi' \ ^M MWVll WWV^ T^T ^l<LII<r1^, ^Tll^41<o, [®icrll<H^< ,^.^f.^3S)......i^....^200 ^T^T^^ .(l^ia^^) I^fw^ft^^ii^r S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. 03.07.2009 Shri S.S. Rajput, Advocate| Shri AV Shridhar, Advocal None appears for responde] The instant petition is 16.06.2009, passed by YIth Ajdditional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur (for short 'Tr whereby and whereunder the Tri1 petitioner submits that by way o^ to challenge the cover note of ij '^Rta^ 'HTR^tf ^ fe^ ^f^$R ^^fW^i^T ^garwal for the petitioner. ;e for the respondent No.l. ntNo.2&3. [lirected against'the order dated [bunal'), in Claim Case No. 77/08, ^unal has dismissed the application ofthe petitioner/Insurance Comp^ny filed under Section 151 ofCPC for taking written statement on re|cord. Without going into the nterits of the case, eouasel for the filing written statement they want |isurance filed by the owner to be wi of the matter regarding liability fake and forge which cause to r^ot \ ofthe insurance company and als|o submits that in case permission is granted to the petitioner to file ^ritten statement, they are ready to ^im^r ^^R ^UK^ <i^-<i^iM—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000. 1 v '^.. Jt i "^,. 'y'i^ "^w^^' ^^^T'^NT ^Niaiit^r^^N? Sahu 'T^r ^i^id^, ^nl-M^Ko, [®i<ni-y^< ^rw^^^l-^a---^20o^ '^T^T ^^F .('ll^f3®l^?) yeiiw^fpr w^r -2- conclude the hearing within two be prejudice nor the trial woulcj conclude the hearing within a pev\ Shri Shridhar has only obj^ Therefore, with the conse^it ofthe parties, it is direeted that the written statement filed by before the trial court shall be takejn on record subject to psyment ofa sum of Rs. 5000/- as costs to thl positively conclude the ease wi^ today and if the petitioner fail^ further time shall be granted to th|e petitioner. With these observati6n ^ disposed of. ^r^fepfrT ^R^Jf ^ 'fe^ ^fN^K ^^H^T^T oaonths aiid the respondent w^l not be delayed as they undertake to iod oftwomonths. ction regarding cost. the petitioner/insurance company b claimant and fhe trial court shal |hin a period oftwo monfhs from to adduce his evidence then 110 nd direction, this petition stands Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge ^W^^^ ^UU^ <^Rr^f^—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000.