1 IN THE PARSI CHIEF MATRIMONIAL COURT, BOMBAY SUIT NO.4 OF 2010 Percy Dara Mehta ..... Plaintiff No.1 Arine Percy Mehta ...... Plaintiff No.2. Mr. Dara Minodar Mehta, fater of Plaintiff No.1 present. Ms. Arine Percy Mehta, Plaintiff No.2 present. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.:- 1. This suit is filed for divorce by mutual consent under the provisions of section 32B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act. Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 have filed their affidavit in lieu of evidence. Plaintiff No.2 is present in Court. Plaintiff No.1 is working in USA. He has sent his notarized affidavit. Plaintiff No.1’s father is present in Court. He has identified the signature of his son. Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 have filed Consent Terms which are annexed at Exhibit-B to the Plaint. After going through the affidavits filed by Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 and the suit filed for divorce, I am satisfied that the consent decree is not being obtained by collusion between the parties. Affidavits filed by both parties clearly disclose that they do not intend to continue their relationship as husband and wife. 2 2. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause (a). Decree is also passed in terms of the Consent Terms which are annexed at Exhibit-B to the Plaint. Consent Terms shall form part of the decree for divorce. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. (V.M. KANADE, J.)