IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32659 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SHABNAM K,AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.ADVOCATE K.ALIKOYA, KODAKKATTAKATH CHALAPPURAM P.O,CALICUT PIN 673 002 2. SHIJAB KAREEM C.T,AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.C.ABDUL KAREEM, CHERUTHARA HOUSE, PATHIRIYAL P.O,PIN 676 123 3. AMMAR ABDULLA K.P,AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.ABDULLA KOYA,AYSHAS, BEYPORE P.O,KOZHIKODE 4. ROJA V.R,AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.K.RAJAN,GOVT.HOMEOPATHI MEDICAL COLLEGE, CALICUT 5. FAEZA C.K,AGED 24 YEARS, W/O.LINSHAD M,ANAPPILAKKAL HOUSE, KUZHIMANNA P.O,PULLENCHERI,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 6. NIKHIL U,AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.K.UDAYAKUMAR,LAKSHMI HOUSE, MANAPPURAM P.O, KODUVALLY CALICUT BY ADV. SRI.K.A.MANZOOR ALI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR 673 001 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT 673 001 SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32659/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P(B) TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 3RD PETITIONER EXT.P(C) TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 4TH PETITIONER EXT.P(D) TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 5TH PETITIONER EXT.P(E) TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF 6TH PETITIONER EXT.P2 TRUE COPY REMITTANCE CERTIFICATE OF 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2(A) TRUE COPY REMITTANCE CERTIFICATE OF 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P2(B) TRUE COPY REMITTANCE CERTIFICATE OF 3RD PETITIONER EXT.P2(C) TRUE COPY REMITTANCE CERTIFICATE OF 4TH PETITIONER EXT.P2(D) TRUE COPY REMITTANCE CERTIFICATE OF 5TH PETITIONER EXT.P2(E) TRUE COPY REMITTANCE CERTIFICATE OF 6TH PETITIONER //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32659 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are final year BHMS students. When the result of the third year examination was declared, petitioners failed in one paper viz., Homoeopathic Materia Medica (HMS303). They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp