IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.6494 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:29.03.2011 S.Waryam Singh ....Appellant versus Satpal and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Ms. Baljeet Kaur Bhullar, Advocate, for the appellant. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of claim for compensation awarded at Rs.28,000/- in a case where the claimant had a fracture that required to be surgically intervened by an open reduction. His medical expenses were fully covered by reimbursement and during the period of his leave, he still drew salary. He was an officer in a bank and the Tribunal while assessing compensation, provided Rs.10,000/- for his disability assessed at 5%, Rs.8,000/- for special diet and Rs.10,000/- for pain and suffering. I do not find any ground for an interference. 2. The learned counsel states that he had lost 88 days and he could have encashed his leave if he had drawn his salary. I will not take that to be the only ground for consideration of the case for an admission in appeal. 3. The award is confirmed and the appeal is dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 29.03.2011 sanjeev