IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6299 of 2010 PROF.(DR.)SHRISH CHANDRA PRASAD SON OF LATE BAIDYA NATH SAHAY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA GHOSHI TOLA, P.S. KOTWALI MUNGER, DISTRICT- MUNGER, AT PRESENT RESIDING C-2 SHUSHILA GARDEN APARTMENT, TIGER HILLS ROAD, P.S. BARIATU MORABADI, AT & DISTRICT- RANCHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVESITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR 5. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVESITY, BHAGALPUR 6. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVESITY, BHAGALPUR 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVESITY, BHAGALPUR 8. THE PRINCIPAL, R.D. & D.J. COLLEGE, MUNGER ----------- 2 13.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that after his superannuation the petitioner was granted promotion on the post of Reader w.e.f. 14.11.1980 and to the post of Professor w.e.f. 01.02.1985 as stated in paragraphs 7 & 8 of the writ application, however till date the correct pensionary benefits taking into consideration the promotion granted to the petitioner has not been fixed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although petitioner has earlier represented the matter by filing representation on 07.03.2010 (Annexure-2), however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)