IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 3687 of 1998 Between: A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep. By its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal , Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, Rep. By its Presiding Officer.. 2 The Regional Transport Authority, Ananthapur Rep. by its Secretary, 3 S.Obulesu S/o Pullappa, D.No.17/3434, Dharmavaram, Ananthapur. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an Appropriate Writ, order or Directon, especially in the Nature of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt. 11/09/1997 made in MP.No.381/97 inMP.No.330/97 in R.P.No.107/97 on the file of the 1st Respondent herein vacating the order of Status-quo granted in MP.No.330/97. and quash the impugned order as being invalid. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.HARINATH Counsel for the Respondents1 and 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None appeared. The Court made the following : WRIT PETITION NO.3687 OF 1998 ORDER:- It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that having regard to the disposal of the main revision petition before the first respondent, this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. 3—11—2004. Stv/- To 1 The Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.. 2 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Ananthapur. 3. Two C.Cs to G.P. for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyd. (OUT) 4. Two C.D. Copies.