IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. SUIT No.73 OF 1994 IN PETITION No.325 of 1994 S. N. Mistry ..Plaintiff. Vs. D.N. Desai ..Defendant. Ms Naziya Qureshi i/b G. R. Mehta, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Ms Z. B. Mistry i/b Pardiwalla & Co. Advocate for the Defendant No.1-Caveator. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. 07. 01. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff submits that inspite of letter dated 20-12-2007 there is no response from the petitioner-plaintiff. The copy of the letter along with original sealed envelope is produced on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff submits that for want of instructions, she is unable to proceed with the matter. In this view of the matter, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)