IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2125 of 2009(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.SUMA DEVAKI, D/O.LAKSHMANA PANICKER, ARAYISSERI VEETTIL, PANDARATHURUTHU THURA, ALAPPAD PANCHAYATH, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.VIMALAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM. 2. TAHSILDAR, CIVIL STATION, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.2125 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that he got certain properties by Ext.P1 document. Soon thereafter by Ext.P4 he applied for effecting mutation of the property in his favour. As it was not done, he filed Ext.P4 complaint before the first respondent seeking to issue appropriate orders to the subordinates for effecting mutation in his favour. The complaint in this writ petition is that not only mutation was not effected but also that even Ext.P4 has not been attended to. Taking into account the aforesaid complaint, the writ Petition itself is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P4, if the same has been received and is pending. Orders on Ext.P4 shall be passed as expeditiously as possible Wp(c).No.2125/09 /2/ and at any rate within 4 weeks form the date of production of a copy of the judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ Wp(c).No.2125/09 /2/