IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 776 of 2003 Between : Bhanu IVRCL Associates, Rep. by its General Manager Projects, J.L.Vidya Sagar, S/o J.Laxmana Rao R/o M-22/3RT.,Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The AP TRANSCO., Rep. by its Chairman a& Managing Director, Vidhyut Soudha., Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Chief Engineer.,400 KV lines & Sub-Stati A.P.TRANSCO.,Vidhyut Soudha., Khairatabad.,Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the amounts due and payable to the petitioner in connection with the work relating to Svt/Ehvt-2/2000 as illegal, unjust and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay the same to the petitioner with interest at the rate of 2% per month. Counsel for the Petitioner : M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents : O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER : It is submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the bill amounts, which are due to the petitioner, are already paid to him. In that view of the matter, no issue survives for consideration in this writ petition, which is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 1st June 2009 ajr