IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2846 of 2008 Date of decision: 25.03.2009. Mrs. Gauri Nagpal Chanana Petitioner Versus Mr. Rajiv Chanana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the respondent ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Insofar as the plea raised by the petitioner-wife for enhancement of maintenance-pendente-lite is concerned, no case therefor has been made out in the circumstances of the case. The earning capacity of the respondent-husband and also the requirement of the petitioner-wife herein and her two sons begotten from the loins of the respondent- husband, has been appropriately discussed in the other petition being Civil Revision No.2531 of 2008 (Shri Rajiv Chanana Versus Smt. Gauri Chanana). In that petition, the order recorded by the learned Additional District Judge, Panchkula, awarding maintenance pendente-lite at the rate of Rs.70,000/- per month in favour of the petitioner-wife and her two sons had been upheld. In the light thereof, the plea for enhancement shall stand declined. Insofar as the other parts of the relief indicated in the petition is concerned, it was not pressed at the time of arguments before this Court. Disposed of accordingly. March 25, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge