IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29042 of 2008 SANTOSH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 302,201/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that the F.I.R. states that the deceased Balmiki Yadav refused to marry the daughter of Chaturi Yadav because of which he was killed. The petitioner is one of the accused named in the complaint sent for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. In the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. the informant now states that the marriage had been solemnized between the deceased and the daughter of Chaturi Yadav. The petitioner is suspected for having illicit relation with the daughter of Chaturi Yadav. Two theories flow that the deceased committed suicide when he came to know of the illicit relation and the other theory suspects the petitioner. The Doctor who has examined the deceased in the case diary has found symptoms of poison. In the entirety of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail during the period of investigation till the submission of charge sheet on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Khagaria in Gogeri (Pasraha) P.S. case No.155 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)