IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 10th day of October 2003 Criminal Bail Application No. 889/2003 CRIMINAL SIDE Suraj Singh Bhist @ Surjeet Singh Bhist S/o Dev Singh Bhist R/o village Sunil P.S. Joshimath District Chamoli. Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal ...Opposite Party. ______________________________________________________________ ___ Arising out of case crime No. 1 of 2003 Under sections 364, 392, 201, 302 IPC. P.S. C.P.O. Tuni, District - Dehradun. ______________________________________________________________ ___ By the Court Hon'ble Irshad Hussain J. Heard Sri Sandeep Tandon, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. There is no direct evidence in the case. There is said to be a statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the applicant-accused. The statement has been read over by the leaned A.G.A. Considering this the ail application is allowed. The applicant-accused Suraj Singh Bhist @ Surjeet Bhist shall be released in crime No. 1/2003 under sections 364, 392, 201, 302 I.P.C. P.S. C.P.O. Tuni District Dehradun on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Dehradun. (Irshad Hussain J.) Dated: 10-10-2003 ISB