1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2897 / 2011 (Sk. Abdul Gaffur Sk.Abdul shakkur vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 17th November, 2011 Heard Mr Anand Parchure, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr A.M. Deshpande, learned AGP for respondents 1 to 3 and Mr G.D. Kavimandan, for respondents 4 and 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner retired as a Principal of the respondent no.5-College. The petitioner is seeking a direction to respondents to grant him the selection grade with effect from 1.6.1999 as well as other consequential benefits, to which the petitioner though was eligible, were denied by the respondents. The Deputy Director of Education in Paragraph 5 of the affidavit dated 8.11.2011 has stated that the proposal forwarded by the Management in this regard was scrutinized and there were some deficiencies noticed by the Deputy Director of Education in the said proposal and, therefore, the same was returned back to respondents 4 and 5 (management) 2 vide communication dated 1.11.2011. Learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 has submitted that the deficiencies, if any, which are required to be rectified by the management shall be rectified within a period of three weeks from today and fresh proposal will be submitted to the Deputy Director of Education. Learned Assistant Government Pleader states that on receipt of the fresh proposal from the Management appropriate decision on the said proposal shall be taken by the Deputy Director of Education according to law and procedure, within a period of four weeks. In view of the above-referred facts, particularly in view of the statement made by the learned AGP that the fresh proposal if submitted by the management for grant of selection grade to the petitioner will be considered and the decision thereon also will be taken within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such proposal, no further direction is necessary in this petition. Hence, Writ Petition is disposed of by keeping the issues open. JUDGE JUDGE sahare