IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13694 of 2010 SURAJ RAM, S/o Tufani Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.21649 of 2010 KAMESHWAR RAM, S/o Prikha Ram. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 29.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 365 and 364A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioners are not named in the First Information Report nor in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. From perusal of the case diary it appears that the petitioners were arrested from the place of occurrence which was assigned for receiving the amount of ransom along with one co-accused Rakesh who disclosed the whereabouts of the victim upon which the victim was recovered. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a reasonable time. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)