IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-24917 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.10.2011 Saneh and another .... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present:- Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. AG, Haryana. ---- M.M.S. Bedi, J.(Oral) Petitioners, pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court has already put in appearance before the summoning Court. Counsel for the complainant opposed the application for bail contending that the police had erroneously cancelled the FIR and that the petitioners are responsible for administering poison to the son of the complainant. Without expression of any merits of the case, it is sufficient to observe that the petitioners have put in appearance before the summoning Court. It does not appear to be the case of custodial interrogation in view of the FIR having earlier been cancelled. The petition is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners will continue to appear before the summoning/trial Court and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner. (M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE 13.10.2011 sonika