IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 829 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Waheed .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 212/10 U/s 304-B IPC, PS Kotwali Mangalore, District Hardwar. ___________________________________________________________________ September 8, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. KS Verma, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that applicant is father-in-law of the victim Rahisa and he is ailing with serious diseases and he is in jail since 19.7.2010. He further argued that applicant is living separately and he has no connection with the alleged crime. He also argued that co- accused Smt. Gafuri (mother-in-law) has been granted bail by the Sessions Court and the applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Waheed be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Hardwar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 8.9.2010 PRABODH