a `i- . IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM ORDER SHEET Regular First .No. 5 ofl/y 2003 .".ra.unLL..&garya.I..........petitioner`Appellant Versus Taherlno i..gas...„......Respondent Order with Signature 1.25 at/ 2.2 9 . 2 003 11,20 Heard Mrs. L. Cha}creborty. learned CcunBel for the appellant,. Admit ® I88ue notice returnable on 25.11.2003. Learned Couna®l for the petltlo undertakes to £1le reqpialte8 for leoue of notice within 3 days. Civil use.^ppllcatlon No.119 o£ ZOOS is accordinoiy. diSpOs®d` 0£.. ( N. sJ. sfiiFT) ( R. K. .EL Chief Juetlce 25.9.ZOOS Office Note as to aaf:LO:!i8:gg! \ :#=,L er&ith=#?o3 Heard Mrs. I.. .Cha]crabor€y. learned Counsel for the appellant. Shrl UiteBh Ramprl learned Counsel has appeared tcx]ay on behalf of the respondent. Paper book may be. prepared by t,he a=Te:::::e:o::::::::¢%|i:ii¥:£££.=# \ ' .L|Bt €hi.a cage for h;aring on 4..3.20 "ti.S*, ". K. E± Chle£ Just,ice 2 5¥f??oo3 I;n±::1:: !65: prut##r •`t;i-.it:,...., gr~t8 fu`<_cLuc] r`t:Lifuf~,Lfi+.Lc,t #,o3 NLutAL^ ' pr f J' 'E=3 ` -Npr tL. QAutL±] == I.-a+tAF frco. ti -L+J', '@hjife 4® 0 Serial No. of Order 3.4. 4.1 5, 3 . 2004 .3.200 18.3.2 Order with Signature Paper books have been filed today in Court. As prayed for by the learned Ccunsel for the part±eo+ list this case on 16.3.2004 for hearing. (N:;k¥, ,eke:.g#e, 4. 1, ifeard in part. Put up day-after- torrorrow. i.e. on 18.3.2004 for £Qrther heart:g;:}`¥„ t R.K. ptr Jtidge -Chle£ Jtlstloe 04 Heard Mrs..I,. Chakraborty. counsel for the appellant and Shrl Umesh Ranpal. counsel for the r98pondent. Counsel sdrl that the partle.a have entered lr`to comprim on certain terms and condltlons and they will £1le a jQlnt compronlee petltlon ln course Of today. Put up tomorrow for consideration of that petltlon 1£ filed. \ ilREEE (N. :;:-...,,..`. ( R. K. Patra ) Chle£ Tuetlce e ogcc,:.¥o,*':;;i taken on Qtoer -¥ft&, Order with Signature Office Note as toaction(ifany) Ord6r taken on Order Heard Mrs. Ij. Chakraborty. Counsel for the appellant and Shrl Ume8h Ranpal. Ccunsel for the respondent. Counsel submit that the parties have entered into coxproulse on certain terms and conditions and they will file a joint corqpromiBe petition in ccurse of tcx]ay. Put up tomorrow for consideration of that petition if Ill.a. t N.NSH¥T Q tcffe¥.T:# It i8 stet.ed that parties have not been able to sign the colxpromlse petition. Put up on 24.3.2004. In the meantime. the parties may file ccxpromise pet.itiorl. N ( N, S, Ju G± nob)- I ( R, K. Cmle£ Ju 3.2004 Defendant is in appeal which is directed against the judgment dated 27.6.2003 passed by the learned District Judge (East and North) Sikkim at Gangtok in Civil Suit No.16 of 2001 directing his eviction from the suit premises. During the pendency of this appeal, the parties have entered into compromise out of Court and have today filed a joint petition praying to dispose of the matter in terms and conditions mentioned therein. The appellant and respondent have signed the compromise u -+ + . ¥ktcefoffiifJ£: Serial No. of Order Order with Signature petition. We have heard counsel for the .parties. In view of the compromise arrived at by both the parties, the judgment and decree of the trial court are hereby set aside and this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition which shall form part of this order. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as indicated above. No costs. ( R. K. Chiof JhLstiee th 1::.hi. cOLul- ul lrty