!u;inRl2 uanra IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION.N0.32-^~OF 2005 BETWEEN ^>nfl Parma.nand Dubey, S/o Late Shri Ramjhalak Dubey , aged about 52 years, Occupation service working as Assistant Grade III, posted at South Surguja Forest Division Ambikapur (CG). , PETITIONER ^-l-^^'s^ ^..^•---^K®.0^-^'^'" i.."^-''—""" _..... piessa' "6"Fo> 3. 4. 01 AND 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department of Forest Department, Mantralay, Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) The Conservator ofForest, Surguja Circle, Surguja, Ambikapur (CG). The Divisional Forest Officer, South Surguja Porest Division, Ambikapur (CG). The Deputy Divisional Forest Officer, Surajpur Forest Division, Ambikapur (CG). RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA »<M< ,-a^ -<i|4ilciq, ^irfWre, TS^TRTy ^..^,.e..fc)..o....'s?.a.3:icfcS-... fi^ZOI ^l^l^-^-i '^1;ii^ ^tt7R ® Shri Awadh Tripathi, cou4.sd for the petitioner. Shri Saiideep Dube^, Govt, Advocate State/respondents on advaace <j°py- Heard. '. . 1 Leamed counsel for fhe p^titioner has chaUeuged the legaUU- and vaUdity of orders dated 129.12.2004 (Annexure P-5) and ! 17.01.2005 (Aimexure P-7). By| order dated 29.12.2004 the day of absence of fhe petitioner has b^en ordered to be treated as leave witiiout pay and by order dat^d 17.01.2005 (Amiexure P-7), tiie under the provisions of Rule 9 of plassification, Conti-ol aiid Appeal) petitioner has been suspended| the M.P. (C.G.) Civil Services (f Rules 1966. Leamed couxisel for tjie petitioner subiuits fhat the petitioner has filed aa app^al agamst fhe impugned order AnaexuTe P-7. However, no ac^ion has been taken on the appeal. He prays for disposal of the pe^ition ivith a direction to decide fhe appeal at fhe earliest within fhe time prescribed by fhis Coiirt. This lunited prayer m.4de by leamed counsel for the petitiouer has uot been opposec| by leamed counsel for the State. The prayer is allowed. Haviug considered fhe fafcts and circuinstaiices of ftie case and inaterial on record, it is dujected that if the appeal filed by fhe petitioner aganist the impugne^ order dated 17.01.2005 (Amiexure '^Tj-JS-a.ot disposed of. it woillll be disoosed ofwithip. one m.oufh ^PRJ—FS/350— 12/2000—50,000. ^^^'s'^^ .:ii^.?-. ^^ ^l'SI 'ysf ^wwi, 9-^WW, fsldiy^ ^I^'^R?('^qt35I?:f) also staad disposed of. \ Certified copy as per rui^s. •<>wiyiiil-f •qrrof •? •re%ttf^n: ^siransntn froia the date of the filing of f|ie certified copy of fhis order before concemed authorit}7. Witti aforesaid observati4n, fhe petition stands disposed of, Consequenfly, M.¥/.P.N|o.288/2005 and I.A.No.701/2005 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge