IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5165 of 2010. Decided on: 9th September, 2010. Krishan Singh. ….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(a) That a writ in the nature of mandamus be issued thereby directing the respondents No.1 to 4, more particularly respondent No.3 to complete the enquiry within 15 days and further respondents No.1 to 4 be directed to take appropriate action against respondent No.5 in accordance with law.” 2. The respondents have no objection in granting the prayer of the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the prayer directing respondents No.1 to 4 more particularly respondent No.3 to complete the enquiry within 15 days from the date of production of a copy of this 2 judgment by the petitioner and within another 10 days, action, if any required in the light of the report shall also be taken. In case, the enquiry, as above, is not completed, we make it clear that the Inquiry Officer shall be personally liable for all the consequences. The parties shall cooperate with the enquiry. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. 9th September, 2010. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.