IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETTENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.170 OF 2010 Between: Sheri Sidda Reddy … PETITIONER And Burala Srinivas … RESPONDENT This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.170 OF 2010 ORDER: 1. Without there being any provision for discharge during trial of a summons case, the petitioner/accused filed the petition under Section 245 Cr.P.C. to discharge him for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The only ground urged by the petitioner is that there is discrepancy in dates of dishonour memo and the notice as per allegations in the complaint. Allegations in the complaint cannot be treated as pleadings in a civil matter. Complaint includes the documents appended to it. If the documents appended to the complaint are looked into, then there is no discrepancy much less unexplainable discrepancy. The lower Court rightly dismissed the discharge petition. 2. Hence, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. ___________________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J July 19, 2010 MD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.170 OF 2010 July 19, 2010