IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 66 of 2008 Pradeep Kumar Mittal. ………….. Appellant Versus Union of India & anothers. ………….. Respondents. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vishwa Prakash Bahuguna, Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for respondent No.1. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. V.K. GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by clearly holding that the appellant was merely undergoing a 9 month training course. Undergoing and completing a fixed tenure training course does not at all amount to any appointment on any post. The learned Single Judge, therefore, was right in declining to grant any relief to the appellant. No interference is called for. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (J.C. S. Rawat, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 06.06.2008 06.06.2008 G