IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9484 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: MAY 26, 2011 Brij Bala Goyal .....Petitioner VERSUS Union of India, New Delhi & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Shailender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has already approached this Court through a writ petition, seeking direction to take action against those Broadcasters, who are authorising distribution of signals/transmissions to unregistered Multi System Operators (MSO). This is causing heavy loss to the petitioner. Now the petitioner has an information, showing that the broadcasters have admitted that they are providing signals to two MSO illegally operating. This is in violation of the policy. Since the petitioner has already approached this Court for taking action and now has proof about the illegality, he can seek the present relief in the said writ petition more appropriately instead of coming in a separate writ petition. Counsel seeks permission to take action accordingly. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to seek this relief in the earlier writ petition. May 26, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE