IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 15591-CAT of 2010 Date of Decision: 31.08.2010 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and others …Petitioners Versus Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Anil Rathee, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Alok Jagga, Advocate, for Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Advocate, for the Caveator-respondent No. 2. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges order dated 22.1.2010 (P-9) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for brevity, ‘the Tribunal’), in T.A. No. 149-CH of 2009 (CWP No. 4097 of 2004). It is conceded position that the Tribunal has disposed of four applications by the impugned order dated 22.1.2010, which was assailed by the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and its officers in CWP Nos. 10299 of 2010 and 10300 of 2010. A Division Bench of this Court (of which one of us, M.M. Kumar, J.) dismissed the said writ petitions vide judgment dated 28.5.2010, upholding the view taken by the Tribunal. CWP No. 15591 of 2010 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners we see no exception or to take a contrary view in the instant petition. Therefore, for parity of reasoning the instant petition is also dismissed in terms of the Division Bench judgment, dated 28.5.2010, rendered in CWP Nos. 10299 and 10300 of 2010. The office is directed to add a copy of the judgment dated 28.5.2010 and the same be read as part of this order. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) August 31, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2