IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST APRIL 2009 / 1ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12574 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- M.A.ANTONY @ ANTO, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE (RETD.), CRIME DETACHMENT, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT MALIEKKAL HOUSE, NIRMALAPURAM ROAD, KOORKENCHERRY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR.B.H. RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,POLICE HEAD QUARTERS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SMT. R. BINDU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.12574 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in this writ petition is for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P2 & P3. The petitioner states that while working as a Sub Inspector of Police, he retired from service on 31/07/2008. It is stated that although in relation to an incident that took place in 1994, there was a criminal case and also departmental proceedings against him, according to the petitioner, he has been acquitted in the criminal case, which was registered as SC No.92/97, and has been exonerated from the departmental proceedings also. It is stated that inspite of all these, his terminal benefits have not been released and by Exts.P2 & P3, he has represented in this behalf to the 3rd respondent. It is complained that not only his terminal benefits have not been released but also even orders have not been passed on the representations. 2. Taking into account the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P2 & P3, if these representations have been received and are pending. Orders WP(C) No.12574/2009 -2- shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg