IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19984 of 2009 MANOJ KUMAR RAI, S/o Binod Kumar Rai, R/o Village – Manikpur, P.S. Kanti, Dist. – Muzaffarpur …………………………… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner;:- Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate. For the State:- Mr. C. Jawahar, A.P.P. ----------- 3. 05.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is resident of the same village where dacoity had taken place and the informant knew him from before. However, none has been named in the F.I.R. Subsequently the informant and others have raised suspicion by stating that one month back the petitioner had threatened him with dire consequences. Solely on that basis and on the basis of the alleged confessional statement of the petitioner, he has been made accused in the case. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and since 22.01.2009 he is in judicial custody. 2 Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has confessed his guilt in paragraph 45 of the case diary. In the facts and circumstances of the case I direct the petitioner, Manoj Kumar Rai, to be released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 18/2009. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )