IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2010 / 13TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17001 of 2010(A) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ABDUL AZEEZ PATTERIMANNIL, S/O.ABDULLA PATTERIMANNIL AGED 49, NOW RESIDING AT DOHA, QATER,P.O.BOX.6999,REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY K.K.E.SOOPHY,S/O.EBRAHIM,53YEARS PUTHIYAPURAYIL HOUSE,CHERUVANNOOR P.O., MEPPAYYOOR,KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.SIBY MATHEW, SMT.P.A.REZIYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.17001 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P11 order passed by the respondent under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. The petitioner contends that, that order was passed pursuant to Ext.P10 judgment of this court. According to the petitioner the respondent has not considered the issues involved as directed by this court in Ext.P10 judgment. He also would contend that, the impugned order although stated to have been passed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, the same is actually one under the Kerala Land Utilization Order. 2. Whether it is under the Kerala Land Utilization Order or under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, the petitioner has an effective alternate remedy before the appropriate authority as per W.P.(C)No.17001 of 2010 -2- the respective legislation. Ext.P11 order is dated 07.08.2009 also. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to exercise my discretionary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner in this writ petition. Therefore leaving the petitioner to seek his remedies as provided under the relevant legislation applicable, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/