1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEE NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 238 OF 2009. IN WRIT PETITION NO 516 OF 2009 Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, court’s orders or directions and registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders 1. Heard learned Advocate Shri A. P. Yenegure h/f Advocate Mr. P.S.Patil for the petitioners. 2. This contempt petition is filed alleging that respondent no.2- Press and Registration Appellate Board, office of Registrar of Newspaper for India(SIC) has disobeyed the order of this court dated 20th March,2009,passed in Writ Petition No. 516. By the order this court directed said respondent no.2 to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from today, if not already disposed of. From the copy of the order produced at Exh. A, it does not appear that 2 anybody had represented respondent nos 2 to 4 when the order came to be passed. Under this circumstances it would be necessary for the petitioners to bring the said order to the notice of present respondent no.2 and in that case, it could be said that there was breach of order by the said Authority. From Exh. D filed alongwith contempt petition, we find some communication, but there is no postal acknowledgment showing that, it was properly addressed and received by the present respondent no.2, which was original respondent in Writ petition. The designation of the respondent no.4 also needs to be verified. In the circumstances no cognizance can be taken of this contempt petition. The contempt petitioner should bring the order to the notice of respondent no.1. In view of this, the contempt petition is disposed of. Date : 28.08.2009 ( P.R.BORKAR, J) MTK/ cp238/2009.