1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH NAGPUR First Appeal No.105/1991 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande, J . Dated : October 18 , 2006 The only grievance made by Mr. Gupta, Advocate for the appellants is that though the Tribunal was entitled to dismiss the claim under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short “the Act”) on the ground that the deceased himself who was driving the vehicle was rash and negligent and as such the claimants who were legal representatives of deceased driver were not entitled for compensation under section 166 of the Act but the Claims Tribunal could not have refused relief under Section 2 140 of the Act. Mr. Gupta, Advocate seeks time to make submissions in this regard. At his request S.O. 14.11.2006. Call for record and proceedings. JUDGE A.