<i. ?"IBr1'^ -a^,:" >. ^ ^i^^l sisfiy: BS:J"t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. (°2)4-/2006 Service matter PETITIONER ./ /'' ....<^. ^^y Y^y" ^" ^'^'^••"" -/''ts&'^y''' ^..-^^y RESPONDENTS •/ -co^ ^cs^^^si^ ^ (^^ to "• - ^. c^^l( 3. / ^. ^^ ws.yy^ y.5^^ ^f ••^'.^^ -.- .^jd^A '^ ^. .>"ft^ '^~ ....'"-'• Surendra Kumar Pande^ Aged about 41 years S/o. Late Shri Malik Ram Pande Working as Waterman Aadiwasi Balak Chhatrawas Beltara, Block Beltara, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^-— VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste, OBC & Minority Welfare & Development Mantralaya D.K.S, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Tribal Welfare & Development Rarpur (C.G.) The Collector (Tribal Welfare Development) District Bilaspur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Welfare Development) District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION QF ?6/2 INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QFJfVRIL IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS^DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J •)f; WR1T PETITION N0.1094 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents Surendra Kumar Pandey Versus StateofChhattisgarh & Others GQWRI Present :- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, counsel for the peb'tioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on 24th March, 2006) In this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to implement the benefrt of the revised 5ih pay scale w.e.f. 1-1-1996 with interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made representation through union to respondent No.2. Learned counsei confines his prayer to consideraUon of the petitioner's representation already made through union to respondent No.2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in accordance with iaw. • For the reasons stated above, the petitton stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge