CR No.1493 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No.1493 of 2009 Date of decision March 19, 2009 Raja Ram Singh and others ....... Petitioners Versus Municipal Committee, Sirhind ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Ashish. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The application filed by one of the respondents for framing issues for consideration was rejected by the Collector on the ground that there is no provision for framing issues. He has also held that he had been deliberately prolonging the case. But this application has been moved after the petitioner closed his evidence and when it was posted for evidence of the respondent. 2. Issues or points of consideration are framed in order to stay in focus of the relevant aspects for adjudication. The Collector is directed to take note of the reply filed by the respondent in the petition for ejectment and proceed with the trial. 3. The revision is disposed of at the stage of admission itself to consider the issues which have been filed by the respondent before him and proceed with the trial from the stage on which it was previously posted. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 19, 2009 archana