IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19541 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: October 18, 2011 Des Raj ….. Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.M.K.Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) Only grievance of the petitioner in the instant petition is that despite the fact that he retired on 31.3.2010, his retrial benefits have not been released to him. He has thus prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus. Learned counsel has pointed out that representation dated 25.7.2010 (Annexure P-1) was also submitted by the petitioner, but no decision was taken thereon. Notice of motion. On the asking of the court, Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab accepts notice. He submits that if there is no legal impediment, the retiral dues admissible to the petitioner shall be paid by the concerned authority at the earliest. In the eventuality that some legal impediment is there, a decision on representation (Annexure P-1) shall be taken expeditiously. In view of statement made by learned State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed by this court. Disposed of. October 18, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE