IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-26153 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.10.2009 Hardeep Singh @ Ravinder @ Bitu .. Petitioner v. The State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. G. C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Patter, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR in question was registered on 29.6.2001, in which the petitioner was not named. Thereafter, the complainant in the FIR, even filed a criminal complaint regarding the same incident. Even in that complaint, the petitioner was not named as accused. Now after eight years of the incident, name of the petitioner has been mentioned by the complainant in his statement and on the basis thereof, he has been summoned to face trial in an application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. In terms of earlier order passed by this Court on 17.9.2009, the petitioner has already appeared before the court below and furnished his bail bonds to face trial. Considering the fact that the FIR in question was registered about 9 years back and no investigation is required to be carried out from the petitioner; his custody is not required and he has already put in appearance and furnished bail bonds before the court below, the interim order passed by this court on 17.9.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 9.10.2009 mk