hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1784 OF 2009 VVF Limited ... Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.A. Dada, Sr. Counsel along with Mr. V.R. Nankani with Mr. Vipin Jain, Mr. Krishna Kumar, Mr. Vishal Agarwal i/by Mr. P.K. Shetty for Petitioners. Mr. R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel with Mr. M.S. Bhardwaj and Mr. Rajinder Kumar for R. Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. P;.SW. Jetly for R. Nos. 5 to 7. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2009 P.C. Rule. By consent heard forthwith. After hearing the parties, in our opinion, it is not necessary to set out the facts in detail for the order to be passed. The Petitioners here are aggrieved by the decision of the Norms Committee in reviewing the ad hoc norms fixed by them earlier with retrospective effect. Various other contentions have been raised including a submission that the norms committee has no power to review of the ad hoc norms which were earlier fixed. The other contention has been that there has been non compliance of the principles of natural justice and fair play and on this count also the decision of the Norms Committee liable to be set aside. After hearing the parties, in our opinion, the ends of justice will be met if the following order is passed : The order dated 22.7.2009 and all consequential orders passed in consequence thereto are set aside. The matter restored back to the file of the Norms Committee. The Norms Committee after giving opportunity to the Petitioner, to decide all contentions raised by the Petitioners including their contention that the Norms Committee has no power of review. The documents sought to be relied upon by the respondents before the committee must be made av available to the Petitioners. Considering the controversy, the Committee is directed to dispose of the matter at the earliest. The Norms Committee to permit the Petitioners and respondents if requested by them to be represented by legal counsel. The order if adverse to the Petitioner, not to be acted for the period of four weeks from the date of communication of the order to the Petitioner. (D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)