Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 812 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 812 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 812 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant v/s. Shri Rama Kalya Patil-by his legal heirs - 1. Anant Rama Patil & Ors. ..Respondents ALONGWITH FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 814 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 814 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 814 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant v/s. Harischandra Hira Patil & others ..Respondents ALONGWITH FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 816 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 816 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 816 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant v/s. Shri Parashuram Bhiwa Patil ..Respondents ALONGWITH FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 817 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 817 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 817 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant v/s. Ramesh Rama Patil & others. ..Respondents ALONGWITH FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 818 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 818 OF 1993 APPEAL NO. 818 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant v/s. Shri Ambaji Bhalchandra Mhatre ..Respondents Mr.S.N. Gawade, AGP for the Appellant Mr. K.N.Kore for Respondent 2 CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 17th September, 2007 : 17th September, 2007 : 17th September, 2007 P.C. This Court by order dated 17-1-2005 in First Appeal no. 1132 of 1994 between State of Maharashtra v/s. Rajaram and further in first appeal no. 512 of 1992 State of Maharashtra v/s. Sadanand Patil dated 21-12-2005 have dismissed all the State appeals whereby the challenge was made to the grant of enhancement of compensation at the rate of Rs. 10/- per sq.feet. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Both the parties fairly pointed out that the judgment passed by this Court in the above cases covers the facts and circumstances of the present cases also as lands are identically placed and situated in village Koparkhairane which is in Taluka and District Thane and the land acquisition references arising out of the same dispute and in the same villages have been duly assessed and this Court in all those matters has maintained the compensation at the rate of Rs. 10/- per square meter. 3. Therefore, taking note of all these factors as well as facts and circumstances of the case and as the enhanced compensation as awarded is just and fair, there is no reason to disturb the findings arrived at by the 3 Learned trial Court and especially when there is no cross objection filed by the claimant. 4. Resultantly, all the appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]