1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.49 OF 2011 Barclyas Bank PLC Petitioner versus Blue Bird (India) Limited Respondent Mr.Hiren Mehta for petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23rd June 2011 PC : 1. The petitioner's claim is in excess of Rs.30 crores in respect of banking facilities granted by the petitioner to the respondent. The cheques issued by the respondent have been dishonoured. The respondent company did not respond to the statutory notice. Even at the stage of admission the respondent company failed to appear and no written statement was filed to the petitioner's claim. The petition was admitted on 23rd March 2011. Affidavit of publication dated 6th June 2011 is on record. The affidavit proving service of notice under Rule 28 dated 3rd June 2011 is also on record. Even at this stage the respondent company has not filed any reply to the petition nor have they come forward to defend the petition. I am satisfied that the company is unable to pay its debts and deserves to be wound up. The company petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (f). (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)