AB 1764/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. S inha, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam, is also heard. As per the direction of this Court, the learned P.p. has received instruction an d also in possession of the case diary. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the case diar y where the statements contained therein as narrated by the learned P.P., which this Court presumes to be the true statements and as per the statements containe d in the case diary, it is revealed that the petitioners are the father and moth er and relatives of the victim girl. The whole case centres around between the b oy Amir Hussain and the victim Aklima Khatun, who have executed an agreement of marriage for which the complaint was lodged. However it has also been revealed f rom the CD that the villagers in the village meeting consented the marriage of t he said boy and girl and the matter has been settled in the village Mel held by the villagers, though the relatives of the victim girl is not in agreement. Sinc e both the boy and the girl have attained the age of majority it is also further submitted by the learned P.P. that in the village Mel held, the terms and condi tions of the marriage have been settled. Considering all the aspects of the matter and the submissions of the learned counsel, this Court is of the considered view, that the petitioner is entitled to be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail and therefore, the interim bail p assed by this Court on 20.7.11 is hereby made absolute under the same terms and conditions. With the above direction, this bail application stands disposed.