IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1159 of 2008() ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28557/2006 Dated 19/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS IN W.P ---------------------------------------- 1. SUDHEESH D.N., HSST SOCIOLOGY, SN HSS, KAZHIMBRAM, THRISSUR. 2. SHEEBA E.V., HSST SOCIOLOGY, SN HSS NORTH PARAVOOR. 3. S.MADHUKUMAR, HSST, MSM KAYAMKULAM. 4. MINI JOSEPH, HSST SOCIOLOGY, LEO XIII HSS ALLEPPEY. 5. INDIRA.N., HSST, SNM HSS MOOTHAKUNNAM. BY ADV. SRI.BENOY THOMAS SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC --------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------ Review Petition No.1159 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) No.28557 OF 2006 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of November, 2008. O R D E R This review petition is at the instance of the writ petitioners for reviewing the judgment in W.P.(C) No.28557/2006 dated 19.09.2008. By the said judgment, this Court has disposed of the writ petition directing the Government to take a decision on Exhibit P27 representation in the light of the decision of this Court in State of Kerala vs. Suja Kumari (2006(1)KLT 846). 2. The issue pertains to exemption from B.Ed. In Exhibit P27 representation, what is actually claimed is extension of time for passing the B.Ed course. It is submitted that even if that relief is granted, petitioners may not be getting the benefit of regularization with effect from the date of appointment. Hence this writ petition is to be heard on merits, it is submitted. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Government Pleader, it is fairly clear that the R.P.No.1159/08 2 larger questions involved in the writ petition will have to be considered by the Court on merits. Therefore, this review petition is allowed and the judgment dated 19.09.2008 in W.P.(C) No.28557/2006 is recalled. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp R.P.No.1159/08 3 KURIAN JOSEPH, J. R.P. No.1159 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) No.28557 OF 2006 O R D E R 05.11.2008