IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2011 / 22ND POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38340 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- EDATHALA GCDA K.K.NAGAR RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, R.SASIKANTH. BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHARA, COCHIN, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN, SC, GCDA FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.38340 OF 2010(N) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by the enhancement of price of the houses allotted by the 2nd respondent to their members. It is seen that aggrieved by the above, they filed Ext.P9, which is pending before the 2nd respondent. When the matter came up for hearing petitioner confined the prayer for consideration of the said representation. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent points out that the issue is covered by the judgment in W.A. No.2453/2007. Be that as it may, having regard to the pendency of Ext.P9, without expressing anything on merits, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider the said representation. This shall be done at any rate within 6 weeks from the production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :