IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 3573 of 2009 Between: Md. Fareed S/o. Jabbar, R/o. H.No.1-1-59, Muslimpura, Metpally, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Metpally Municipality Rep. by its Commissioner Metpally, Karimnagar District. 2 Sajid Ali Siddiqui S/o. Khaja Qayyum Ali Siddiqui R/o. H.No. 1-2-167, Muslimpura, Metpally Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order or direction declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not taking any action considering the representation filed by the petitioner dated 23-11-2008 against the illegal construction which is being made by the respondent No.2 occupying the road margin in Muslimpura locality, Ward No.11, Metpally Proper, Karimnagar District as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of the provisions of the A.P. Municipalities Act. Consequently direct the respondent No.1 to take immediate steps for removing the illegal construction which is being made by the respondents No.2 occupying the road and without leaving any set backs, in Muslimpura locality, Ward No.11, Metpally Proper, Karimnagar District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondents: MR.P.RADHAKRISHNA The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.3573 of 2009 Order: The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though he made a representation to the first respondent on 23.11.2008 to stop and remove the illegal constructions made by the second respondent occupying the road margin in Muslimpura locality, Ward No.11, Metpally, Karimnagar District, it has not taken any action so far. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Radha Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent, and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage. Admittedly, the representation made by the petitioner on 23.11.2008 is pending consideration before the first respondent. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction: The first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.11.2008, after giving notice to the second respondent, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 25.02.2009 VGB