IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3283/2006 {Vimla Sharma Versus Jaipur Development Authority & Another} Date of Order :: 18th August, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Rajeev Surana for the appellant Mr. Dharmendra Pareek for Mr. J.M. Saxena for the respondents BY THE COURT: Admit. Mr. Dharmendra Pareek, advocate appears for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents not to remove her kiosk alongwith an application for temporary injunction. The defendants appeared in the trial court and made a prayer for grant of time for filing reply. The learned counsel for the plaintiff pressed his application for temporary injunction at least for a period till reply is filed and arguments are heard on the application for temporary injunction. The trial court heard the arguments on the interim prayer and vide order dated 19th September, 2006 granted time to file reply to the application -2- for temporary injunction, but refused to pass any interim order. Being aggrieved with the same, the present appeal has been preferred on behalf of the plaintiff. It is relevant to mention that the application for temporary injunction is still pending in the trial court, as contended by learned counsel for both the parties. This appeal is directed only against an interim order, which was refused during the pendency of an application for temporary injunction. Since this court granted interim stay order dated 21st September, 2006 whereby both the parties were directed to maintain the status-quo and JDA was directed not to dispossess the appellant from the Kiosk in dispute, in these circumstances, I think it fit and proper to direct the trial court to decide the application for temporary injunction as soon as possible within a period of two months from today and till then the interim order passed by this Court dated 21st September, 2006 will remain in force. 4. The appeal stands disposed of in the manner as indicated above. 5. A copy of this order may be sent to the concerned court for necessary action. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK