IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26057 of 2009 SATISH KUMAR YADAV @ VIJAY YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner is accused in a case instituted under sections 177, 120 B, 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes & Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Allegation against the petitioner is that he defalcated the amount which was sanctioned for the purpose of construction of house of the informant under Indira Awas Scheme. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no concern with the same. Neither he is a Govt. servant nor has he received any payment for the informant. At best he could be treated as a middle man. Be that as it may, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, , Supaul, in Marauna P.S. case No. 0089 of 2008. (Sheema Ali Khan, J) M.Rahman