: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8552 OF 2009 Shri Vijay Ramchandra Chougule ... Petitioner Vs 1. Chief Election Commission of India & 2 ors. ... Respondents Mr. G.S. Godbole with R.V. Bansode for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Rajgopal for the respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. B.V. Phadnis for the respondent No.4. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is an admitted fact that in the nomination papers, the respondent has mentioned the number of the SLP which has been filed before the Apex Court. The said SLP arises from some criminal proceedings. The grievance of the petitioner is that alongwith the number of the SLP, the offences for which the SLP is pending before the Apex Court, should also have been disclosed. We do not find it : 2 : appropriate to go into that aspect of the matter at this stage. Those persons who are interested in knowing as to what are the offences covered under the SLP have an access to the SLP. At this stage, we do not find that there is any ground made out to interfere in the Writ Petition. 2. That apart, it seems that the petitioner has approached this court for wrongful acceptance of the nomination papers of the respondent. Since the election program is in progress and voting date has been fixed on 13th October, 2009, we do not deem it appropriate to interdict at this stage. Petitioner may follow appropriate remedy available to him in law after the election results are declared, if the occasion so arises. We, therefore, refrain ourselves from entertaining the Writ Petition and it is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)