CD Cfw mi, MK y§§§$§§ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION (S) No. :ZW“ (2010 wRIT PETITION ulA 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; PETIONER ¢§anoj Kumar Chandrawanshi, aged about 57 years, son Of Shri Bisan Lal Chandrawanshi, occupation — service, Upper Division Teacher, presently working as — Lecturer, Govt High Schooi —Dhaurabhata, Vikas Khand — Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS * REsPONDENTs 1. /State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of Schooi Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. /Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnaiaya, Directorate, Raipur (CG) 3./Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & Pension), Raipur (CG). 4. ”’Distt. Education Officer, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) IT 9” I Z-Ion’ble Supreme Caurt in the case of § 01's. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. Et is further submitted that this view in its order dated 6.2.2009 pass< Counsel for the petitioners further s 29.442010 passed in Writ Appeal NC. grant of two advance increments as pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. In View of above/thet'ife’tition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as §§.B.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRIT M} 12-2910: Shri A.N.Bhakta, counsei for the etitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. GA. {or th . State. Counsel for the petitioner su mits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance incre ents on account of he having passed B.Ed. examination before his a pointment at his own cost. It s submitted that the issue involved n the present petition is no onger res integral and the same has been finally decided by the a Saxena Vs. $tate of M.P. lourt has also taken a similar ad in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008‘ ubmits that the order dated 124/ 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Cotrt in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this court in another Writ Appeal No, 87/2009, directions have been issued for oonsideration of the case for per circular dated 21.9. 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradest., after verification of the facts per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. EN mm- Wm m Wmmafga ‘ \‘J;.,Q=..L;§.)...%:g§12}mb Wamw?fiaz°tm éwrfranm 1as not expressed any opinion concerned wouid be at liberty = with law S‘ prit'm Et is made clear that this Court l 3n merits of the case and the authority to decide the same strictly in accordanc ker Diwake‘ Judge WT§ ?fC1I dl