IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6884/2009 Kuldeep @ Anoop vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 11.09.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Vivek Goyal, for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Shri Vivek Goyal Advocate on behalf of the applicant Kuleep @ Anoop pertaining to F.I.R. No. 178/2008 at police station Lal Kothi, Jaipur City (East), in the offence under Section 379 of IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that he has been falsely implicated in this case. So far as the pendency of other six criminal cases against him is concerned, the petitioner was arrested on 18.07.2009 from Central Jail, Jaipur and the FIRs lodged in between 9.07.2009 and 18.7.2009 with regard to the theft of two wheelers were attributed to the petitioner and thus, in nine days, he was arrested in six cases. The petitioner has been in custody for the last two months. The case is pending trial, which is likely to take time, hence, he may granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application on the ground that the petitioner is already in Central Jail, Jaipur, in theft Case No. 429/2007 of police station Vidhayakpuri, Jaipur City. The petitioner is a habitual offender. The spat of theft of motor- cycle has been keeping on multiplying rapidly in Jaipur City and around, hence, the petitioner may be denied bail. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material on record, it is noticed that the spate of theft of motor-cycles has multiplied during last month in the city and such incidents of theft are on high rise, hence, with a view to put a check on it, it becomes necessary to exhibit serious concern. So far as the disposal of this bail petition is concerned, I without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, do not feel inclined to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner and the bail petition deserves to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the bail petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the accused-petitioner Kuldeep @ Anoop stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. Mak/- 11