THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4156 of 2008 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 16.07.2008 in E.P. No.4 of 2004 in O.P. No.77 of 2000 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that entire calculation is not in accordance with the decree passed in Original Petition No.77 of 2000, as modified by this Court in Appeal Suit No.1830 of 2002, and it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the calculation memos filed by both the parties are not in accordance with the judgment and decree passed by this Court in the appeal. Hence, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the executing court with a liberty to both the parties to file fresh calculation memos with reference to the judgment and decree passed by this Court in Appeal Suit No.1830 of 2002. The executing court shall dispose of the Execution Petition within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving opportunity to both the parties and duly following the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India[1] and also clarification made in the decision in Chimanlal Kuberdas Modi (died) by LRs. V. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation & others[2]. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, allowed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 3.3.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4156 of 2008 3.3.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4156 of 2008 3.3.2011 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer/Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), A.M.R.P., Gandamvarigudem, Nalgonda …Petitioner And Kantu Mallaiah & others …Respondents ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 20.03.2006 in E.A. No.53 of 2006 in E.P. No.107 of 2002 in O.P. No.15 of 1987 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapuram. 2. Heard both sides. 3. A perusal of the impugned order would go to show that the calculation made by the trial Court is not in accordance with the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India[3] and also clarification made in the decision in Chimanlal Kuberdas Modi (died) by LRs. V. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation & others[4]. Therefore, both the parties are directed to file calculation memos with reference to the aforesaid decisions and thereafter the trial Court shall decide the issue basing on the ratio laid down in the said cases. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed setting aside the impugned order, and remanding the matter to the trial Court. No costs. [1] (2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 457 [2] (2010) 10 Supreme Court Cases 635 [3] (2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 457 [4] (2010) 10 Supreme Court Cases 635