THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.13813 of 2007 Date 04.10.2007 Between: Dupaguntla Bala Krishna. ..... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Sub-Collector, Vijayawada & another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.13813 of 2007 O R D E R: The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s father late Sri Dupaguntla Brahmaiah was in possession of the land belonging to the government to an extent of 826 sq. yards in NTS No.301/B corresponding to old survey No.282 situated at Vijayawada. The Sub- Collector, Vijayawada filed L.G.O.P.No.150 of 1994 on the file of the Chairman, Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam to declare the petitioner’s father as a land grabber and to deliver the vacant possession of the said land to the Government. The said L.G.O.P. was allowed with a direction to the Sub-Collector to collect reasonable market value from the petitioner’s father and regularize the said land in his favour, failing which, it is open to the Sub-Collector to evict him from the said premises. It is stated that pursuant to the award dated 09-04-2003 in L.G.O.P.No.150 of 1994, the father of the petitioner made a representation on 30-06- 2003 to fix the reasonable price and after the death of the petitioner’s father, the petitioner is said to have made representations on 01-12- 2006 and 12-02-2007 to fix the reasonable price and regularize the said land in his favour. As the said representations had not been disposed of, the petitioner filed this writ petition seeking a direction to dispose of the said representations. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that admittedly, the said representations are pending and for fixing the market value, the date of delivery of order dated 09-04-2003 of the Land Grabbing Tribunal orders would be taken into consideration and that the fixation of the market value is under process and the relevant material i.e. registration statistics are being gathered. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioner’s father, who died later, as well as the petitioner dated 30-06-2003, 01-12-2006 and 12-02-2007 respectively pursuant to the judgment of the Chairman, Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam in L.G.O.P.No.150 of 1994, as expeditiously as possible, without undue delay. No order as to costs. ______________ 04-10-2007 usd