IN PHE HIGH URf OF KARNAfjA AT BjrrGgoaE Dated ttts the 2th day of May 1998 BEFORE THE HO?PE MR. JU3I’ICE 3.R. B$!NTJIThIATH BETTN Leelavathi, 52 years w/o. Balalcrighna Shety, R/a. Nringen Vi1lge & to st, Bant’1 ‘alt, (By i. A,G, SlIiVaflfla & Sri, B. Manohar, ACv,) AIID : , gharada Vo, su&banna Ral, Rio. Palthady buse, Kolthige vil1ge, Puttur Taluk, D 1 kshinq Kaflflada, 2, Madhavs as,45 c r 5/0, Lingppadas, 4grieulturl st, R/o, Pachanady village, Post: Bondel, )4ingalore Tsl Z, DksMflaKaflflald. • E 3 PO DEt (By Sri. A. ahabaleswar Ehat, Mv,) for R2) a hit L,R. • i lea i/s 1-A FIR Act gaifls4 the order dt,16,8,2H assea 111 0 a’ Mo.LRA(TT)44/86 on the file of tee District Land Reforns pel1ate Autimity, M’lor 4 ),:: roje Isp p licat on tt ad o,l— 10 f :2: This petion coming on for hearing this day, the Court made the following: In this petition, the order dated 16.08.1988 passed by the District Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Mangore, on l.A. I filed by the petitioner is challenged. This a.plication 1.4.. I Was filed by the petitioner under Order-I Rule-lO C seeking permission to unlead herself as the appellant on the ground that the land in question has fallen to her share in a partition in the family in the year 1966. The respondent-tenant idtedut sinwing her as a oimer, has left her name in the application and has sho the applIcant’s sister Smt, Sharacia a a landlord, 2, Tt Land ¶Tinal granted occupancy rights tich ras the subject matter of the petition this Court • The *it Petition s filed by Sh4rada, the 1< sister of the pet..:itioner.... and after th .• 3 a. • %& • I the ,ppdiate AuthoritY came into esistence, the matter was transferred to it, wh’ein the present application has been made, The plate Autbority rejected in application aS bhiated one and that by impleading the petitioner, it would amunt to filing of a new aspeal which in turn would be hit by limitation, 3, It is to be noted that this Revision Petition is filed when the Appellate AuthDrity Was in cxi stance slid the APpellate AutiDrity is abolished by Act 18/88 dated 08,10,1990 and ther after, the main matters have been converted into Civil Petitions and later lnto !tit Petitions on the application filed by the concerned parties. 4, The learned Counsel for the petitioner is rt aware whether there is any such Civil Petition or kit Petition filed against the order of the Land Trhnal in this Court, As the petition is fled for in•••.terim• order, no purpose will be :4: be served by 5 llowing such application 8t this stage, HoNever, the petitioner s given liberty to file appfloation in the Civil Petition or ‘rit Petition if already flied in this Ooert ch1leagng the final order of the Land Tribunal and urge a 11 her contentions. 5. with these observations, petition is disposed of, sd/rn JUDGE BG/ fln/ ‘a w