(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 176 OF 1994 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 176 OF 1994 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 176 OF 1994 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1972 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO. 1972 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO. 1972 OF 1994 M/s. Shirke Structurals Pvt. Ltd. Pune ...Appellant Versus Prakash Babanrao Gaikwad ...Respondent ..... Ms. Preeti Bakalkar i/b Frawford Bayley & Co. counsel for the Appellant Mrs. Neeta Karnik, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 30TH NOVEMBER, 2005 DATED: 30TH NOVEMBER, 2005 DATED: 30TH NOVEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for Respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have mutually settled the matter and have filed the minutes of consent terms to that effect duly signed by both the parties and their respective (-2-) counsel. The same is taken on record. Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the said minutes of the consent order. Issuance of certified copy is expedited. *****