IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-32541 of 2011 Date of Decision:07.12.2011 Anil . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Surajbir Singh, Advocate, for Mr.S.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for bail pending trial in a case registered vide FIR No.777 dated 02.09.2011 under Sections 323, 328, 342, 353 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 27/54/59 of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short ‘the Act’) at Police Station City Karnal. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had threatened the complainant while holding a gun. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main accused has already been granted bail by this Court in CRM-M-29347 of 2011 titled as “Rajesh Kakkar Vs. State of Haryana” on 19.10.2011. Learned counsel for the State, however, opposed the bail application vehemently and argued that the petitioner does not deserve concession of bail. I have heard both the learned counsel for the parties and have considered their respective submissions. In the order dated 19.10.2011 passed in CRM-M-29347 of 2011 this Court had dealt with the facts of this case in detail and granted bail to the main accused. In view thereof, the present bail application is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) DECEMBER 07, 2011 JUDGE Vivek