1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION nO.27 OF 2009 (Paster Rajendra Hemant @ Nemchandra Bhambhal Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.B.Patil, Adv., h/f Mr. S.P.Ghogre, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.K.M.Suryawanshi, APP, for the respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:2/9/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the original complainant. 2. The acquittal recorded in RCC No.335/2004, by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhusaval, on 15.12.2008, for the offenses punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC is subject of challenge by the original complainant. 3. The record demonstrates that there were civil controversies as to status of the accused with 2 the complainant. A civil suit No.140/2003 came to be filed for declaration and perpetual injunction against the decision of the complainant There was temporary injunction in favour of the accused restraining the complainant from taking election of Marathi Alliance Church, Bhusaval. The matter was challenged by the complainant in Civil Appeal No. 162/2003, where the appeal came to be allowed and the order of injunction was vacated. The complainant came with a case that there is misappropriation of the accounts, however, nothing could be demonstrated that any amount is misappropriated or used by the accused for his personal gains. The observations of the learned Judge are in conformity with the record, does not warrant interference. No illegality. Revision Application is dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/276-09crra ...