W.P. No4g§3 .......2004 _W1~it Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India RN? Petitioner ........... W" M‘ . .. Hannwram Thakur aged 50 M\ W” Son ofPatiram Thakur. Q ENW “a ° President Jila Sakha, Chhattishgarh Laghu Vetan W939 OM KAY Chaturth Verg Karmachari Sangh \ _ c3 ‘ Chhattishgarh working in the OfJiIa Sampark office, Durg(C.G.) @a i Versus Resppondent Shri D.B.Nag s/o not known, Aged about 6O years, Prantadhayakchha, Chhattishgarh Laghu VetanS ashkiya Chaturth Kamchari S egistration 110.6472 reorganization by the State Govt, um x.1 HM -HC—8 AE7 3E? 31W, Em, fwmg; WW Wwfwaw\ WE, 2W W mm; (Wiaa‘wg) The petitioner has tiled th s wn’t patition under Article “226/ 227 of the Communion of India ql estioning the. legality, propriety and cornecmess of the order dated 1 .11.;2004 passed by respondent— Shn‘ D.G. Nag, State President 0f (. Ladhu Vetail Shashkiya Chaturth Verg Karamchari Sangh, The writ jurisdictioll avail ble to this Court under Article 226 of The Constitution is agaiust any a otion or inaction taken by the State or its inetmimentalities. Since the State is not a party in the present petition mid the impugned orde hae been passed by the respondent, who is not within the Fttrvew 0f State, this petition is not maintainable, same is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, it is dismissed at the admission stage itself. However, the petitioner, if so wishes, can avail the alternative remedv available to him under the law. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge LEG i aa¢%®r35rfawi$ 1m? 3W gaw mmyf‘aaawg i wwwmw Um a: af‘m: W 1 1 .0 1 .2005 Shri Ajay Shn'vastava, co sel for the petitioner. Htard.