IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (smo. 3% (2007 WRIT PETITION U A 22g OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \N PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As given in the cause title . PETITIONER OM PRAKASH KESHRA (aged about 36 years, S/o Punau Ram Keshra Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Primary School _~ Kochera, R/o Village Naragi, qQé Q‘ key Tahsil Daundilohara Distt.— § W Durg ( C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS [l STATE OF CHHATTISGARH x — x 609i Throug h Secretary " W I] , .Panchayat & Village \\ w’pSR oi ’ Development Department, e 'a/ I Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G,) Chief Exective Officer District Panchayat Durg (C.G.) 9 \CoHector, Durg (C.G.) ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$ W. P. (s) 376 of 2007 OmPrakah Kashra Versus ‘ Respondents Singlc Bunch: Honble Mn Justice somh x. whom. Mr. DR. Shanna, Senior Advocate wkh Ms. Anifa Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Ponei lawyer for the mpondents/Stote. Petitioner Sum of Chhatfisga'h and others ogbgg (PM on 23" Day of Jana-y, 2007) Lonrned oounsei appearing for tho petitioner whmits that pm 5 of the circula‘ datod 12.7.2m6 (Annexuro P/Z) provides that a far as possibic the husband-wife Shimha Kwmis be placed at one piace or nearby piace. According to Ieorned counsel for the petitioner, the ‘hwband has been posted at a place of 50 kilometer away that is not in comma with the circular dated 12.7.2006 of the State 6wemment. Lewned counsel further submits that the representation dated 3.10.2006 (Annexure P/3) to this effect has already been made to the Secretary, Government of Chhattisgwh. Pmohqat md Rural Development Department and the Seeretwy may be directed to consider the representation, sympathetically, on its own merit, within the stipulated period. Me. sunita Jain, leaned 'Paiei iwyer ¢pewin9 for the respondents/State has no objection. In view of the facts and circumstmcos of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Secretary to dispose of the pending reprwentation (Annexure P/3) within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri § Judge