IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37137 of 2010 1.ABHITABH BACHAN YADAV 2.SHIV KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.10.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking modification in the order dated 23.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.19557 of 2010, whereby bail was granted to the petitioners subject to certain conditions set out in the order. The condition no.1 of the said order required the father of the petitioner to stand as one of the bailors. Learned counsel for the petitioners, with reference to the statement made at para-3 and 4 of the present application, submits that although the father of the petitioners initially had not been named as accused in the present case but during the course of investigation, he has been made accused along with some other family members and thus, for the aforesaid reason, the father of the petitioners can not stand as one of the bailors. Learned counsel submits that it is in these 2 circumstances that the present application has been filed seeking modification in the order dated 23.6.2010. Having regard to the statement made at para-3 and 4 of the modification application and the submissions of the learned counsel, the order dated 23.6.2010 passed in Cr.misc.No.19557 of 2010 is modified to the extent of condition no.1 set out in the order which would now read as follows: “(1) That one of the close relative of the petitioners would stand as one of the bailors and who would file an affidavit before the court below indicating his/her genealogy with the petitioners.” The order dated 23.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.19557 of 2010 stands modified only to the extent indicated above in context of the condition no.1. The modification application stands disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)