BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.17114 of 2011 AMITH RAJKUMAR @ AMIT, ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADASERY POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.3107/2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.JAWAHAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as sole accused in Crime No.3107 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, for the offence under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, 1992. The petitioner was arrested on 15.12.2011. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2. Heard Mr.J.Jawahar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions likely to be imposed by this Court, in the event of granting bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the allegation as against the petitioner is that he is said to have trespassed in to the house of the de-facto complainant and caused damages to the tune of Rs.40,000/- and abused the de-facto complainant with filthy language. He would further submit that if for any reason, the petitioner is released on bail, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. but with stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions :- (i) The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. (ii) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.3107 of 2011 before the learned Magistrate concerned; and (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. sd/- 23/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADASERY POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. J.JAWAHAR Advocate SR.No.45570 SR : 26.12.2011 : 2P/7C : IT ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17114 of 2011 Date :23/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/