BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12673 of 2011 1. SHANTHI 2. UMA GOWRI 3. JEYARAMAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 3 TO 5 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR, CR.NO. 05/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.SIDDHARTHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.3 to 5 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 417 and 109 IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.05 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were already enlarged on anticipatory bail, but, the petitioners are unable to surrender and execute the sureties because of the satisfaction Court's name has been wrongly mentioned as Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai instead of learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam, Thanjavur District and hence they come forward with this application for anticipatory bail. 3. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and he fairly conceded that the petitioners were already got anticipatory bail. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, it is seen that the petitioners were already enlarged on anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioners were ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam, Thanjavur District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 05.30 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 22/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PAPANASAM THANJAVUR . 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.SIDDHARTHAN Advocate SR.No.32754 SR : 27.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12673 of 2011 Date :22/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/