IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.90 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.47 OF 2004 IN LONG CAUSE SUIT NO.6647 OF 2002 Dinoo Dara Daruvala & Anr. ...Appellants Versus Miss Pillo Dadabhoy Broacha & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Sachin V.Masurkar for Appellants. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 15, 2006. FEBRUARY 15, 2006. FEBRUARY 15, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None appears for the Respondents though served. Matter was got produced yesterday when it was ordered that the matter be notified for today : 2 : in the regular Board. This course was adopted notwithstanding that the matter was notified in the production board for yesterday after service. Inspite of the fact that matter is notified on today’s regular board and the appearance of Respondents’ Counsel is displayed, none appears for the Respondents. 2. In the circumstances, as this Application is not opposed and for the cause made out in the application being sufficient cause, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) in the interest of justice. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.