IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2008 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 8856 of 2008(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PRATHEEP KUMAR.K.B., TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, VYTHIRI, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAVELI BHAVAN, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SMT.MOLLY JACOB,SC,SUPPLYCO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).8856/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is as regards his deputation to the Civil Supplies Corporation. His objections against Ext.P5 list was dealt with by me in Ext.P8 judgment dated 15.2.2008, in Writ Petition No.5505/2008, which was disposed of with the following directions. (i). Petitioner may file objections to Ext.P5 within three weeks from today. (ii). If such objections are filed, the 2nd respondent shall look into it and take appropriate decision in the matter of including the petitioner in Ext.P5 at the appropriate place, going by Ext.P1 guidelines. The deputation of the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance till such time orders are passed by the 2nd respondent and his deputation, thereafter will be, subject to the petitioner's placement in the list. W.P.(C).8856/2008 2 It seems that by the time, Ext.P8 judgment along with Ext.P9, which will have to be treated as an objection to Ext.P5, was received by the Director of Civil Supplies, Ext.P10 order came to be passed by the Director. In the result, Ext.P10 has also been challenged in this writ petition. Petitioner has, in fact, challenged Ext.P5 as well in this writ petition. In so far as the challenge against Ext.P5 is concerned, the issue is already covered by the directions in Ext.P8 judgment. I do not propose to issue any further direction in variation of that. But, petitioner had to be heard in terms of Ext.P8 judgment and his objections to Ext.P5. Learned Government Pleader submits that this shall be done without further delay. In the result, writ petition is disposed of declaring that the directions contained in Ext.P8 judgment will govern the parties. Accordingly, second respondent W.P.(C).8856/2008 3 shall consider Ext.P9 representation and take a decision thereon, as already directed in Ext.P8 judgment. This shall be done at the earliest, at any rate, within one month from today. The interim order already passed by this Court on 14.3.2008 shall continue till such orders are passed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs