1 M.Cr.C.No.4027/11 16/11/2011 Shri Rajeev Upadhyaya, Advocate for the applicant. Shri B.P.S. Chauhan, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. Heard and perused the record. This is the first application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail filed on behalf of the applicant-Ashish Sharma. The applicant has been arrested in Crime No.266/2011 registered at Police Station Karera, District Shivpuri for the offence punishable under Section 392, 397 of the IPC read with Section 11/13 of the Madhya Pradesh Dakaiti Avam Vyapharan Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam on 01.06.2011. According to the prosecution case, the applicant along with his associates have robed Shanti & Usha on the point of fire arm. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the instant crime. The T.I.P. of the applicant was conducted on 13.6.2011 i.e. after 20 days of the alleged incident. In the T.I.P., Shanti, Usha 2 M.Cr.C.No.4027/11 & Chandrabhan have not identified the applicant. However, only one complainant-Rinku has identified the applicant. It is further contended that after completing the investigation, challan has been filed against the applicant. On these grounds, learned counsel prays for grant of bail. Learned Panel Lawyer has opposed the application and prays for its rejection. He further contended that the applicant has criminal antecedents. In response, learned counsel for the applicant has filed copies of the judgments dated 19.08.2010 passed in Special Sessions Trial No.73/2007 by Special Judge, Datia, dated 16.11.2010 passed in Special Sessions Trial No.34/2010 by Special Judge, Datia, dated 20.09.2010 passed in Special Sessions Trial No.66/07 by Special Judge, Datia and dated 22.02.2011 passed in Criminal Case No.450/2010 by J.M.F.C., Datia and contended that in all these cases the applicant has been acquitted. He has also filed a copy of the order dated 11.5.2011 passed in M.Cr.C.No.2859/2011 by this Court, in which the applicant was enlarged on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the 3 M.Cr.C.No.4027/11 case and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, but without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I am of the view that the application deserves to be allowed. Consequently, the application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., is hereby allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, on the condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and also comply with the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C., A copy of the order be send to the Court concerned for necessary compliance. Certified copy as per rules. (Brij Kishore Dube) Judge (ra)