IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13716 of 2011 1. Bir Bahadur Singh Lt. Raghunath Singh Makaunia P.S. Muffasil Motihari, Distt. East Champaran Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary Rural Development Dept. Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Collector, East Champaran, East Champaran Motihari 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, East Champaran Motihari 5. The Block Development Officer, Motihari Sadar, Distt. East Champaran Motihari 6. The Mukhia Gram Panchayat Raj Ramgarhwa Distt, East Champaran Motihari 7. The Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Ramgarhwa, Distt. East Champaran Motihari . 2 12.9.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer under Gram Panchayat Raj, Ramgarhwa seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to get the stock registers of the materials supplied and distributed by the petitioner audited in accordance with law. The petitioner submits that he did not receive the earlier notice regarding refund of the undistributed rice either under S.G.R.Y. or F.F.W. schemes. The petitioner submits that according to the authorities 126.03 quintals of rice remains undistributed with him and according to the petitioner 48.03 quintals of rice remains with him. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 2 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. Without going into the rival contentions of the parties regarding quantity of undistributed rice with the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 25% of the value of undistributed rice (48.03 quintals) at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of undistributed rice or rice itself in excess of 25%. KHAN (S. P. Singh, J.)