IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 30254 of 2009(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. VARGHESE THOMAS,S/O.LATE THOMAS, AGED 34 YEARS,KULANGARA HOUSE,KAPRASSERY, NEDUMBASSERY.P.O. 2. SABU THOMAS,S/O.LATE THOMAS,AGED 32 YRS, KULANGARA HOUSE,KAPRASSERY,NEDUMBASSERY.PO. BY ADV. MR.T.K.AJITHKUMAR (VALATH) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE CHENGAMANAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, PUTHUVASSERY,NEDUMBASSERY.PO. 2. K.K.SAJEEVAN,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, KOTTANATH HOUSE,KARASSERY,NEDUMBASSERY.PO. R1 BY ADV. MR.C.M.SURESH BABU R2 BY MR.JAICE JACOB, MR.G.G.MANOJ, MR.P.M.BENZIR . THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.30254/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINANT DTD. 6.5.09. P2:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD. 6.5.09. P3:- COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 10.9.09. P4:- COPY OF THE STOP MEMO ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 24.9.09. P5:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT. 15.10.09 ISSUED TO THE IST RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.30254 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner complains that the second respondent is not obeying Ext.P4 stop memo issued by the first respondent. The first respondent is a grama panchayat. It has issued Ext.P4 in relation to a workshop owned by the second respondent. The proceedings initiated as per Ext.P4 have to be concluded. The second respondent and the petitioners are entitled to be heard in relation to Ext.P4 and it is, hence, directed that the petitioners and the second respondent shall be heard and final decision taken following Ext.P4 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The first respondent shall ensure that until a final decision is taken vacating Ext.P4, the second respondent does not carry on with the activities against which Ext.P4 has been issued. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.24/11.