IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6811 of 2011 SATENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the petitioner was earlier on bail in a case registered under section 302/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act but he made absent himself whereas other co-accused faced trial and they were convicted. The bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled in the year 2006 and subsequently, in the year 2010 i.e. on 4.11.2010, the petitioner was arrested by the police at the strength of permanent warrant of arrest issued against him. Taking into consideration the conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to release him on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no. 187B/2000 arising out of Tarari P.S. Case no. 21/2000, pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. I, Bhojpur at Ara and accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within nine months from the date of receipt of this order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)