HIGH C^MIRT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BIfcASPWl SB;HON»BLBSHRIJUSTICBPRITraKBRDIWAKBR W.P. (2271 N0. 2046/2009 PBTITIGIIBR Kanker Roadways, Throiigh fhe Masiagbig Partner, Preetam Siagh Garcha, S/o, Late Jogendar Siag, aged about 59 yeai-s, R/o. Civil Liaes, Raipur (CG) (AppUcaat before the R.T.A.) RESPONDBNTS Versus 1. Regional Traasport Aiifhority, G.E< Road, Opposite Lal Gaxiga Shoppiag Mall, Raipur (C(^ 2. Kamaljit Kaur, W/o. Late Satwant Singh GiU, aged about 40 yeara, C/o, Mahendra Travels, Raipiir, Distt. Raipur (Applicaat before the R.T.A.) WRIT PESTniCMt UI10BR ARTK3LB 227 OF THB CON8TITUTION OP INDIA Asoearaace: Sbri S,K.Bajpai, counsel for the petitioiier, Shri Ama Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No< 1. ORALORDBR (24.04.2009) At the outset, Shri Arun Sao, Govt Advocate ft>r fhe State/resp. No. 1 subiaiite fhat ffaere is an altea'iiatiye rcmedy avaUable to fhe petitioner for approachiiig fhe State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal. ;'^. Counsel fbr fhe petttioner siibimte fhat at present, post of Presidiag officer m State Traiisport AppeUate Tnbunal is lyixig vacaafc Shri Sao has prodiiced a copy of fhe ©rderdated 17.4.2009 passed by tfae State Goveraniexit regardiiig appoiatmexit of Shri Ashok Kuinar Nimoiikar as fhe Presidiag Ojfi&cer ofthe State Transport Appellate Tribunal. In view of ftiis fact, coujisel fbr fhe petitioner waiits to wifhdraw fhe present writ petitioii with liberty to appix>ach the State Transport AppeUate Tribunal by filhig revisioii, Accordiagly, the petition is disimssed as wifhdrawai wifh Eberty as aforesaid. However, it is directed fhaf if the petitioner files the revision beforc the State Traiisport AppeUate Tribunal the same shall be decided e^qpeditlously. Registry is dirccted to retuni the cerfcifi^l copy of fhe order dated 28,01.2009 passed by fhe Regioxial Traiisport Aufhority provided that duly attested Xerox copy of tibie same is fumished by fhe couiisel fbr fhe petitioner. ^——^ Sd/-, prU^ev 'O-^a^ 3udQe Suguna