IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7268 of 2008 1. SURENDRA CHAUBEY 2. DEVENDRA CHAUBEY BOTH SONS OF MAHJESH CHAUBEY 3. SANTOSH CHAUBEY 4. ASHOK CHAUBEY BOTH SONS OF NANHKU CHAUBEY 5. DHANANJAY CHAUBEY SON OF ARJUN CHAUBEY ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-RAGHUNATHPUR, POLICE STATION-CHENARI, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. 6. SANTOSH LAL SON OF SHAMBHU LAL 7. VIJENDRA PANDEY SON OF LATE KAILASH PANDEY. BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-CHHOTKI BERTALI, P.S. CHENARI, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. --PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. OM PRAKSH PANDEY SON OF KAMESHWAR PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-CHHOTKI BERTALI, P.S. CHENARI, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. --OPPOSITE PARTIES. _____ For the Petitioners : Mr. Siddharth Harsh For the State : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP 3 23.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This is an application seeking quashing of order dated 13th April, 2007 passed in Complaint Case no.501 of 2006 (Trial no. 1972 of 2008) taking cognizance for the offences under Sections 232, 341 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code. Main grievance of the petitioner, as submitted by the 2 learned counsel for the petitioners, is that it is just a counter blast of the case filed at their instance wherein the complainant is in custody. According to him, the manner of occurrence, as stated, is improbable and there is no injury report etc. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to say about the present stage of the case. If the trial is yet to commence, petitioners may agitate their points before the court below at the stage of hearing of charge or any other appropriate stage as per situation of the case. With this observation and liberty, this application stands disposed of. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad