ui^s,!.i^it6M ^s'^ff^^-''^^ p-s---' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3875 of2008 Dr. Kunj Bihari Sharma S/o Shri Manohar Lal Jee Sharma, aged about 62 years, Occupation - Retired Govemment Servant, R/o Near District Court, Raigarh Road, District Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Adim Jati & Anusuchit Jati Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Adim Jati & Anusuchit Jati, Raipur, DistrictRaipur(C.G.) 3. Assistant Priyojna Prashashak, Ekikrit Adiwasi Vikas Project, Jashpur Nagar. 4. Commissioner, Adiwasi Vikas, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asirihotri. J. Present: Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 23" day of April, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat the petitioner was appointed as Ayurved Chikitsa Adhikari on 14.09.1972 (Annexure P/l). Thereafter, the petitioner continued in the same capacity. The petitioner is entitled Kramonnati pursuant to the circular dated 07.04.1997 and 16.12.1997 (Annexure P/3). The petitioner made a reoresentation dated 10.03.1998 (Aimexure P/4) to fhe respondent .^•^ ^l liB'BjSggrih "'•'^s^ aulhorities. The same has not been considered and decided tiU date. In the meantime, the petitioner retired from service in December, 2006. Shri Tripathi has further brought into notice that the process of consideration ofhis case for grant ofKramonnati, it appears, is pending as on 28.04.2008 (Annexure P/12), as the Additional Director, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe De^elopment Department has written a letter to the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal WeUare, Jashpur to submit a copy of the appointment order of the petitioner so that decision can be taken. It is further submitted fhat no deeision has been taken till date. Ms. Jain, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State submits that in ease, a decision has not been taken, the same shall be done in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. In view ofthe foregoing, accordingto leamed counsel appearing forthe petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge .toiit