IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 18332 of 2007 Between: Don Bosco Pharmacy College, 5th Mile, Pulladigunta, Guntur, Rep. by its Correspondent, K. Bhaskar Rao ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee, For Regulating the Admissions in Private Un-Aided Professional Colleges, (Formerly the Committee to Oversee Conduct of CETs by the Association of Private Un-aided Professional Colleges and Allied Matters)1st Floor,(South Wing) Gagan Vihar,M.J. Road, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Member Secretary. 2 The A.P.State Council of Higher Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur, Rep. by its Registrar. 4 The Convenor, EAMCET-AC , C/o.SWII Window, 401 Srinivasa Apartments, 866, 6th Street, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 in not including the petitioner in the list of colleges to be allotted students in SW II Window for Pharmacy programme vide its letter dt. 14-8-2007 as arbitrary, illegal and offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents no. 1 and 4 to allot students to the petitioner college through SWII mode of counseling for pharmacy course in the counseling session to be notified for such SWII Mode by the 4th Respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri S. Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 29-02-2008 Pvks/*