1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.1015 of 2009 (Chotu @ Ravindra Govindrao Kukse v. The State of Maharashtra) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri P.S. Khubalkar, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.B. Patel, APP for Non-Applicant. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 2nd April, 2009 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the non-applicant. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who is alleged to be accessory to misappropriation of goods worth Rs.3,31,989/-. It is stated in the application that the truck as well as the goods have been seized. The learned APP had taken a week's time to file reply. But the reply has not been filed by the learned APP. Considering the nature of allegations made and also the fact that the goods are already seized, the applicant's custodial interrogation may not be necessary. In view of this, the interim order passed on 26-3-2009 is confirmed. The application is disposed of. It is clarified that the applicant is not required to 2 deposit Rs.3 lacs, but he is required to furnish security in that sum. Judge. Pdl.