IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46655 of 2008 1. HARI CHARAN CHAUDHARY, SON OF KAROO CHAUDHARY 2. PAPPU CHAUDHARY, SON OF RAMASHISH CHAUDHARY 3. PRABHU CHAUDHARY, SON OF RAMASHISH CHAUDHARY 4. PRAYE DEVI, WIFE OF HARI CHARAN CHAUDHARY 5. INDU DEVI, WIFE OF PAPPU CHAUDHARY 6. PARMILA DEVI, @ PARBILA DEVI, DAUGHTER OF HARI CHARAN CHAUDHARY. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE- MUTHER, P.S.- JEHANABAD (KARAUNA) DISTRICT- JEHANABAD. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners consists of father-in-law and mother-in- law, the cousin brother-in-laws, the wife of one of them and the own married sister of the husband apprehending in a complaint case under sections 323 and 498A of Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the D.P. Act. The submission is of generalized allegations when notwithstanding the warrant of arrest against the husband against whom the allegations primarily be, evading the same leading to the harassment of the petitioners. Considering the submissions, only for the purposes of grant of bail, let the petitioner abovenamed surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sri Arvind Kumar Thakur, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint case no. 729/2007. If warrant be there of an accused, the Superintendent - 2 - of Police Jehanabad is naturally required to act appropriately and expeditiously with regard to the same. pkj (Navin Sinha, J)