: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.912 OF 2007 Mrs.Mehrangiz I. Moradian & Anr. ....Appellants V/s. Ruhullah R. Naimi & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.G. Hartalkar with Mr.J.D. Khairnar for the Appellants. Mr.Pravin Samdani, Senior Counsel i/b M/s.Prakash & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned order warrants no interference. 2. The manner in which the suit is framed also does not warrant any interim orders of the nature sought. The learned counsel for the Appellants restricted his prayer for injunction to safeguarding the Appellants’ alleged 25% share in the rent being received from Respondent Nos.5 and 6. He states that at this stage the Appellants do not seek any reliefs against Respondent Nos.5 and 6 who have been inducted by Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 3. Even assuming that the suit is maintainable : 2 : despite the provisions of Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, this relief can only be granted upon the accounts being finally settled between the parties. 4. In the circumstances, the Appeal from Order is dismissed.