IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.NO.29529 OF 2010 Date:30-03-2011 Between:- Vegesna Venkata Lakshmi .. Petitioner And The District Collector, West Godavari, Eluru and others. .. Respondents ORDER:- The petitioner assails the inaction of the Tahsildar, Akividu, West Godavari District in considering her representation dated 29-05- 2010 and seeks a consequential direction to do so. 2. The petitioner’s representation dated 29-05-2010 was with regard to the forcible occupation of the site assigned to her in R.S.No.164/2 of Akividu Village by her son, the third respondent. She sought action against him, for removal of the structures raised by him and to hand over the site to her. 3. The Tahsildhar, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District, stated in his counter that pursuant to the petitioner’s representation dated 29- 05-2010, the third respondent was dispossessed from the subject site with the assistance of the Sub-Inspector of Police, Akividu and that the site was handed over to the petitioner. However, the third respondent again appears to have dispossessed his mother, the petitioner, and was not allowing her to reside there. The Tahsildhar, Akividu Mandal, therefore stated that it was purely a family dispute between the mother and the son and that it was not correct to state that no action had been taken upon the petitioner’s representation. 4. In the light of the facts brought out by the counter of the Tahsildhar, Akividu Mandal, it is clear that necessary action was taken upon the petitioner’s representation dated 29-05-2010 but thereafter also, she was not in a position to protect her possession over the subject assigned site. Needless to state, the revenue authorities cannot assist the petitioner at every step in protecting her possession over the said site. She would necessarily have to take recourse to alternate remedies in accordance with law against her son, if she is aggrieved by his illegal actions, if any. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out her remedies against her son, the third respondent, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 30th March, 2011 Note:- Furnish C.C. within one week. B/O. AMD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.NO.29529 OF 2010 Date:30-03-2011 AMD