IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12720 of 2008 PANCHAM KUMAR @ AMRENDRA KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5/ 19/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner named by the wife of the deceased, an eye-witness, renews his prayer for bail in a police case under Sectinos-120/34 and 120B of I.P.C. and 25(1-b)A, 27 of the Arms Act on the third occasion. The submission is that he is in custody since April, 2005 and the trial was progressing very slowly. An affidavit on behalf of the Sr. S.P. has been perused. It is conspicuously silent on the report of the Officer-in-Charge, Kankarbagh P.S. with regard to summons and warrants upon the informant, the prime witness. Insofar as the other prosecution-witnesses are concerned, the court below is directed to proceed appropriately in law so that the trial may be concluded expeditiously at an early date. The application is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)