IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2008 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12237 of 2008(F) -------------------------------------- OS.53/2008 of I ADDL.SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- JOHN M. S/O.MATHEW, AGED 55 YEARS, MEENCHARAPADAN HOUSE, MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- M.N.PURUSHOTHAMAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, AGED 49 YEARS, MANGALODAYAM, MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== W.P.(C) No.12237 OF 2008 ===================== Dated this the 9th day of April 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed for a direction to the Ist Addl.Sub Court, Ernakulam to pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 in order to implement the directions contained in Ext.P1 judgment of a Division Bench of this court. On 7.4.2008, the court below refused to advance the hearing. The Division Bench of this Court while passing the judgment in F.A.O.28 of 2008 directed the respondent not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle for a period of three months nor create further encumbrances. An intimation to this effect was directed to be given to the R.T.A concerned for making necessary endorsement in the R.C.Book. If the amount as directed above is paid, the condition as above will stand lifted and thereafter, it is open for the respondent to sell the vehicle. Therefore the court is expected to consider the request made in those applications after hearing both sides. The court shall suo motu advance those applications and if possible, after hearing both sides shall pass an order after understanding the implication of Wp(C)No.12237/2008 -:2:- the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court before the court closes for summer holidays. The writ petition is disposed of as above. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-