:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 156 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 156 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 156 OF 2008 Mumtaz Begam Mohd. Rafiq & Anr. ..Petitioners versus Executive Engineer, Bandra Division Housing Development Board & Ors. ..Respondents Mrs. B. P. Jakhade for the Petitioners. Mr. G. W. Mattos, AGP for the Respondents - State. Mr. J. J. Reddy for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2008. DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This writ petition has been filed against a notice issued by the respondent No.1 asking the petitioners to produce the documents on the basis of which an identity card / photo pass had been issued to the petitioners under the Maharashtra Slum Area (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001. This is not even a show cause notice for cancellation of the identity :2: card / photo pass. Therefore, we do not think that this writ petition can be entertained by this court, at this stage. 2. There is an apprehension by the petitioners counsel that immediately after cancelling the identity card / photo pass, the respondent No.1 will demolish the structure and evict the petitioners. In the circumstances, we direct that the petitioners may file their documents and objections, if any, to the notices received by them within a period of one week from today and the 1st respondents shall decide the matter after hearing the petitioners and if he passes an order adverse to the petitioners, he shall not give effect to his order for one week after passing it so that the petitioners are in a position to take remedies that may be available to them in law. 3. The impugned notice is based on some complaint and the learned counsel for the petitioners complains that copy of the complaint is not given to her clients. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 ensured that the copy of the complaint can be made available to the petitioners tomorrow i.e. on 1.2.2008 at 11 a.m. in his :3: office. 4. This order has been passed after the parties agreed that the matter can be disposed of at this stage. 5. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)