ff ^.~ HiSH COURT OF CHHATTiSSARH AT BiLASPUR PETITIQNERS Kv Writ Petition (S) No.3068 of 2007 1^ 1. Ku. Esit Teresa Bai, Aged about 43 years, Daughter of Shri Alois, Head Mistess, Ursuline Middle School, Jugimura Kodaura, P.0. Dawra, District Ambikapur (C.G.) Shri Ranjeet iVlurum, Aged about 36 years, Son of Shri Surjan, Assistant Teacher, Ursuljne Middle School Jugimura Kodaura, P.0. Dawra, District Ambikapur (C.G.) Shri Jitan Tirkey, Aged about 36 years, Son of Shri Khasru Tirkey, Assistant Teacher, Ursuline Middle School Jugimura Kodaura, P.0. Dawra, DisSrict Ambikapur (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Seoretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhatti^arh) . 2. 3. Commissioner, Department, (Chhattisgarh) Tribal Welfare Distriot Ambikapur ^ ^' Catholic Sansthan Surguja, Uttar Purb Parikshetra, through Nirdeshak, Bishop's House, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) Petitlon U/A 226 ofthe Constitution of India Sjng!e Bench :Hon'bte Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Rahul Birthare, counse! for the petitioners. ShriA.Dubey, Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passedonl-i'"! The question of law involved in this petition is whether the teachere w/orking in government aided private schools are entitled to the benefit of the recommendation of the Fifth Pay Commission under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya F33?amqB®i A-'*"^ Kys& ^^B^^^^^^l^^^^^^^t^^^^^^"^ i &^ Karmchariyon Ke Vstno Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (henceforth 'the Adl-iiniyam, 1978') and the rules made thereunder read with the Madhya Pradesh Revision pf PayRules, 1998 (henoeforth 'the Pay Rules, 1998'). (2) The identical question of lawwasconsidered bythis Court in batch of mattere i:e. SmtA Lall Vs Stateof Chhattisaarh S.Others (W.P.No.4108of 2005) with dther connected matters, and the same was disposed of by judgment and order dated 06.02.2007. It was held that the petitioners who are working in fully Govemnnent aided private schools are entitled to the revjsed pay scales w.e.f.01.01.1996 as prescribal under the Pay Ruies, 1998. Tbis CourthadgrantedcertaindirectionsfuFtherforthepurposeofdisBursementof 'arreara. • ^ • .: : • ': " • (3) Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by.the learned counsel for the parties that this matter is squarely oovered by thejudgment and order dated 06.02.2007 passed by this Courtin thecaseofSmtA Lal!(supra)and other connectedmatters. , r (4) As a resuli, for the reasons stated in the judgment ahd order dated 06.02.2007 passed in W.P.No,4108 of 2005 Smt A Lall (Sypra) and other connected matters, the writ petition is al!owed in the same terms and oondifions. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge a —.^ --^: