AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1955 OF 2009 Mohd. Ashraf Ansari ... Petitioner Vs. Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.K. Agarwal for the petitioner. Ms. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. for the State. Mr. S.P. Patil i/b Utangle & Co. for respondent 3. Mr. Vipin Kamdi for respondent 4. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent 4 inform us that the petitioner and respondent 4 have settled the dispute as per terms and conditions mentioned in the consent terms, which are filed in the court today. Consent AJN 2 terms duly signed by the petitioner, Mr. Paresh R. Patel, the partner of respondent 4 and their respective counsel are taken on record and marked “X”. The undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted by this court. We record the presence of the petitioner – Mohd. Ashraf Ansari in the court. The consent terms have been explained to him in Hindi. He has signed the consent terms in token of the consent terms having been explained to him in Hindi. The petitioner has told us that he has understood the consent terms. 2. Learned counsel for respondent 4 states that within one week from today, respondent 4 shall hand over possession of transit accommodation to the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner states that immediately thereafter, the petitioner will hand over the possession of the hut which he is presently occupying, to respondent 4. These statements are recorded and accepted. Subject to the above, the interim relief granted in favour of the petitioner stands vacated. Order in terms of the consent AJN 3 terms. The petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 3. Needless to say that all civil applications are also disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [A.A. SAYED, J.]