Letters Patent Appeal No.234 OF 2003 01. UNION OF INDIA , THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 02. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MIDDLE ZONE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH 03. ADDITIONAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION), MIDDLE ZONE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH 04. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, ALLAHABAD (UTTAR PRADESH) 05. COMMANDANT-92 BATTALION, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, MANDI, VARANASI (UTTAR PRADESH) -----------RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS Versus TUNTUN KUMAR ROY, SON OF LATE MAMTARAM RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAKANDAPUR, POST OFFICE- RANNUCHAK, MAKANDAPUR, P.S.- AKBARNAGAR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR --------------PETITIONER-RESPODNENT For the Union of India:- Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey (CGC) For the Respondents:- Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Manish KUMAR, ADVOCATE ----------- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH Navin Sinha & Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.J. Heard Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent. The order under appeal holds that once the authorities after departmental proceedings decided to regularize the period of unauthorized leave with half salary, the misconduct alleged of absence no more survives. That was the only charge. Once the period of unauthorized absence 2 was regularized by the respondent themselves no misconduct of unauthorized absence survives. We see no any reason to arrive at any different conclusion than the impugned order and nothing has been urged before us to persuade the holding of another view. The appeal is dismissed. Patna High Court, Dated 22nd April, 2010 N.A.F.R. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.) (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)