Singb S asch: @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATISGARH AT BILASUR. WRIT PETmON No. [0 6 OF 2005. PETlTTlONER. / JAL SAL S/o LATE MEHI LAL GAUR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS KOEA KACHHAUD RIO TARABAHARA (DIST) POST VILLAGE ‘) 0f» { g g:(my) , c G STATE ° VERsus r .qg‘ WSW” , v'”“Na” OY 35 RESPONDENTS. .‘{01 (A KVSIO“ 53 v " gwi 1) STATE OF CHHATISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEPTT GOVERNMENT OF C G DKS BHAWAN RAIPUR C G STATE 2) CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF CHHATISGARH BILASPUR DIST C G STATE. 3) SUB DMSIONAL OFFTCER WATER RESOURCES SUB DIVISION MANINDRAGARH KOREA DIST (CG ) WRIT\ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF N INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS I ORDERS DIRECTIONISI, ETC ’ r \‘ rq, , petition of similar nature and the respondents have been directed to implement their order dated 16108/ 2004. This is not disputed by Shn' Bhaskar Payasi, RL the petitioner submits that ends of justice )Vill be served if the petitioner is allowed to make a regaresentation which is to be decided within the stipulated period in the light of the order cated 17,’ 12/2004 passed in WP, Ne. 3950,12004. l have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also counsel for the State and l has akeady amended its policy and extended the age of superannuation to 60 years by its order dated for the State. Learned counsel for am of the opinion that in View of the fact that the Government XI—HC—78 3a W, Wm, MWIOé 05 WWW mmfawm‘ ammm W 200 Mm (Wu) mwm WWW ’1%Q‘TWI % aim W 2%]01/2085 Shri K.R.Nair, counsei for tha p€TiTioner. Shri Bhaskar PaVasi, PL. for the State. \\' The p€tition€r has 151621 this i11$tamt petition against thé order vide Annexure P—l, passsd by respondent No.3 by which the petitioner who is Working as ChowkidarlXR/atchma11 1'11 the Water Resources Degmrtment of resp011dents has been superallnuated with effect from 30]O6] 2004 after attajnmg the age of 55 yeare. Leai’ned counsel for 'he petitioner further submits that the State Government has ah‘eady taken the decision ahd issued a letter dated 16/08/2004 whereby the age of superannuation has ’ been fixed to 60 years as bcfore. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in View of that decision, this Court has allowed the 3&3? QH‘ KW, $9? $1355} wWoé ‘w 8W was (W) a E WW me§ ff fgw'rW KZ" %?arf%si13n%¥i 16/08i2004 811d the inmmst? 0f justice shall b6 sewsd if thxe Lake c1€tajl€d reprcwntatian bEfore ier as pm“ AnnEXure P—l alGng with lays from todav anc‘i thersafmr the {ecidEd by tho respondonts within a the light of the order of this Court i in “LP. Not 3950/2004. With the aforesaid obsen Consequently, LA. No. 2S petitioner is given 1ib€ryty to 1] the. rospogdonts against the or copy of this ordér within 10 Q above representation shall be ( further period of four weeks i1] order dated 17] 12/ 2004 passe ’ation, the petition is disposed of. 2/ 2005 stands disposed of. /‘_/,/"’ sal- Dhirendra M‘Sh‘a Judge Git VRJ—FS/350—l2/2000~50,000. a_