IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17080 of 2008 Between: A Repally Lingaiah, S/o. Bala Gattaiah, R/o. HJasanparthy Village & Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Revenue Officer, Warangal District, Wrangal, 2 Kukkamudi Komuraiah, S/o. Bondaiah, R/o. Hasanparthy Village and Mandal, Warnagal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, order, or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandmaus declaring the order passed by the 1st Respondent in dismissing the application ﬁled by the petitioner Under Section 166-B of A.P. (Telangana Area) Land Reforms Act, 1317 Fasli in Rc.No.E3/109/2008 dated 30.06.2008 for rectiﬁcation wrong entries made in the pahanies against the Survey NO.404/B in respect ofthe land to an extent of Ac.1.33 Gts., situated at Pembarthy Village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District since 1981-82 onwards, as arbitrary, bad and illegal and consequently set aside the orders of the ﬁrst respondent in Rc.No.E3/109/2008 dated 30.6.2008 with a direction to rectify the wrong entries made in the pahanies in Survey No.404/B in respect ofthe land to an extent of Ac.1.33 gts., situated at Pembarthy Village, Hasanparthy Manda, Warangal District since 1981-82 by deleting the name of the second respondent and incorporating the petitioners name and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.H.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 17080 of 2008 Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner states that he wants to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of his grievances. He is at liberty to do so, if the same is permissible under law. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 07.08.2008 Ksr/Nsr