IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11784 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.MATHEW, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT PUNNAKKALAYIL HOUSE, PANAYAMCHERRY, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU SRI.SURAJ KRISHNA B.S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE ANCHAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ANCHAL.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.11784 OF 2010 (W) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P4, an order passed by the Panchayat requiring the petitioner to remove the shed, which is described as an unauthorized one. According to the petitioner he has been carrying on business in the said shed on the strength of Exts.P1 to P3, for the last several years and therefore the conclusions in Ext.P4 are in correct. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that against Ext.P4 petitioner can seek appellate remedy, I do not think that it is necessary for this court to enter into the merits of the case. 2. Having regard to the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions. 3. It will be open to the petitioner to seek appellate remedy against Ext.P4. In order to enable the petitioner to seek appellate remedy as above, it is directed that further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 will be kept in abeyance for a period of 4 weeks from today. WPC.No.11784 /2010 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/