IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24877 of 2010 NAZIR YADAV, SON OF LATE SUNDAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201,328 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner’s complicity has arisen only on the basis of suspicion, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 26.3.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge, F.T.C. No. 4, Khagaria, in Sessions Case No. 286 of 2009 arising out of Mansi P.S. Case No. 18 of 1999 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the brother-in-law of the petitioner namely Gorakh Yadav. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That 2 the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)