IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12229 of 2010 Smt.Diwali Sinha, wife of Sri Ram Narain Prasad Yadav, resident of village Inayatpur, P.O. and P.S. Goroul, District Vaishali………………………………………………………..……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, 2. The Collector – Cum - District Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur 3. The S.D.O. Goroul, Vaishali. 4. The District Programme Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5. The B.D.O. Goraul, Vaishali. 6. The C.D.P.O., Goraul, Vaishali. 7. The Supervisor, Anganbwari, Goraul, Vaishali…………………………………………………..………Respondents ----------- 2 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that while passing the impugned order, the District Programme Officer has not considered the stand of the petitioner and documents produced/referred by her in her defence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to apply to the District Programme Officer to reconsider the matter and take into account her stand and documents and 2 thereafter pass a fresh order. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. If the petitioner approaches the District Programme Officer, he may take into account the documents and stand of the petitioner which he finds were not considered and noticed in the earlier order. The District Programme Officer will be well-advised to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)