IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11093 of 2010 Amit Kumar Gupta son of Satyendra Prasad Gupta, resident of Mohalla New Area Patel Gali Dehri, P.S. Dehri, District Rohtas…………………..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar……..Opposite party. ----------- 03/ 20.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier he had moved for bail vide Cr.Misc.No.23494 of 2009 which was dismissed on 24.08.2009 by a Bench of this court holding that the learned Single Judge was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at that stage. Hence, it is asserted that the petitioner has now moved this court after remaining in custody for about one and half years. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the assailant is Vinod Painter who is said to have shot the deceased and against him there is substantial evidence, but the petitioner has been implicated only on the presumption that he was an associate of Vinod Painter. He also avers that the said assumption is frivolous as the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Let the petitioner, namely Amit Kumar Gupta be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dehri P.S. Case No.348 of 2008. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )