[ CV\- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. N0. 72003 PETITIONER : Sanat Kumar Kashyap,S/0 Shri Kapil Nath Kashyap, aged 40 years R/0 Vill-Konargarh, Tah-Pamgarh, Dist-Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary ^&^ l'' '«?•'" .^s.^" . -••-' ^>'"'' ^^y -.••''<^'')' General Administration ft ^'^S^ Department, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) Bhawan ^^/" 2. Collector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. iXMIC-22 31^%W Iq-t^ ^l^ ss^htitf^iF (3) TWaJRBCT, MnkwiS, ftwW3< ^....^..^s^ *t(<«'iKn*((<*> '&re^t' a^WWWK ^E^ S-2003 counte Smt. Meena Shas+ri, Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, ! the State/respondents. By thls Betition -fiied und In'diu, ^e^'an order froffl thi4 absorb fhe peti+ibner inany vac<|nt spe<|'fied a schsme to dbsorb ths pstitionej petitioner's petifion the petition^r as a compiier' on c&ntr'act of and he worked from 1-3-1991 To that perjod was sdtistactory. Ths petitioner haS been rt period. Tne Sfate pf MadhyuPr the effee+ +ha+ all +he empioyee^ have been Ter'mlnated on accourtt tr'eated as gut'piusemployeesani:| appointment oh the similar' post3.| The rssporident No.I hasl of the Census|6epartment will<| Chhattisgr'h Siate arid there; earlier occasioh Ihrough the^ci| eniployees were absortied. Tl| "espondent No.l about the regi *!<Ari-i wwf 'S ^A,iN^R it^ftna^ for the pe+itioner'. 5sputv .Advocate (Ssnsral tskss notiee for |r Article 226/2270f the Constitution of Court direeting the respondent No.l'to appropricte available postor towor'kout " in ths appropricts srBployrnent, as per the was uppomted iri the Census Depor'tment durations by the comBe+ent authority 30-4-1992 ond his work Qnd conduct during •^trenched af+sr cpmplstion of the spesified 'r^desh issued a cir-cuiar from time to time to pf the Census &eportment whose seryices of the expiry of The Terni, They wilibe they Mfiii be 9iven pr'ior'ity in the matterof jssued a ietter stating that theefflpi'oyees ^Q be counted ossurpius empl°yees i" 'the be no need of sepdrote.direcTton.i pn] l-cular- dated, 27-2-82- ali the retrerichedj le authority has also communicutsd;.fhe; ulejpization of these cerisus employees.^ :t il : Nili t':!: \w XI-He-22 .aiSBW. BR aiB<> ^>*ff<ft wen Es'!'^"' -:y ::1 il: ,1 ;] i1] !i !: !! LI; '3S?•^tWM^.atilwts;;!^t|'H3< SV^f Mslcb, Ntt|<?llssl»*li<*>"""'"""~""''""7"""~")R;it. 200 ' Rf'bt^iT" sn^T tsnsR ^iftff -z- tfe On the other hand, similar|l absorbed in the other district liM also going to taks appointments irj I have heard the iearned Ashos been mentioned in on contract basis for a fixed petitioner's gervices has beeh The rnain gr-isvance of the the petitioner is not being eonsip o+her appointments are being tak^ The lear-ned counsel for the Apex Court reporited in AIR Tamit Nsdu and another Vs. 6. the Hon'bie >^pex Courf issued dij out a schehfi^ to 'absorb these wouid be appropriote for The $o^| these empioyees jn appcoppiate out as we think that such a situalii wheri such sifuations had arisen, absorbed in &overnment servicfe fiovernment :may aso bear !n mmf jn the locGi'author'ities, quasi-gi companies. ^ 'itualfon ^'l)iftii't4til 'CTPR^f^^^ <Pq<;^R ^stPwsii^iT |ly placed census employees have ateo been je Ambikapur and the freah candidates are the piocs of the pstitioner. [ounsel for the parties. |ie petition itself thatthe appointment was term ond on expiry of that tepm .the terhiinated. learned counsel for ths petitioner is that; si|dered even in Census Department. Some ^M place. . petitioner plaeed i-al.iance on deeision ofj [1999 SUPREME COURT 2202 (Sovt. ofj pftphanisd Ammenyddin A Others) jri ishichi il'ections that fhe ffovernment Shottid workl iplbyees in appropr'iate employmehts.' It; ternment to work out a scheme to absor'61 e(nptoymant. Let such a scheme be u»dM<eci^ occasionally ariss. On esrlier oeeasiohs ^hose whohad done sifflilarjobs/badbeen! r'vic^ by the appellant. ^ In doing so^ "i'l'^ whether the employees con be recr'uil'ecli j^i/er'nmental organizations or Sover-nfflent;; eln •t i:;i •I':;i| XJ-HC-22 |;31I^I^t IS-tiib^ai^CT sttt-liT^ ^tf^ff (^Qrf^ tJi^ / 'S'"? TSrai?f?I, :»'[ft<:f<16, IqCIWy. 3ff^?r 'qt^ wiCTiwnw 'W^ 200 ft^9" diso Xn vlew of the sabove directidl iSovernmeht of Chhattisgarh may smployess who rtad worksd undsr th| direction given by the Hon'bie Apex| approach the Government for absorjition of Chhattisgarh, the Department of representation cppropria+ely. ] In "isw of this order, M| 6792/2003 stand disposedof. With these observations, thej , 'b'Klta'il-J »<il<'il'4ft^.t<["itsi< i? slNti gS^i is given'toy the Hon'ble Apex Court, the consider for absorbjn9 the ^urplus ^ Census bspartment in the tight of the Couft and the petitioner is at liberty to and on his movin9, the 6overnment peneral AdminiSTr'ation rnay eonsiderhis |(W.)P. No, 1999/2003 cnd l.A. No. wr'ri petition is dispoaed of. ', Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge pBSI^ ail :;I ;.*^ :'s 1 i£: