1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SECOND APPEAL NO.393 OF 1988. SECOND APPEAL NO.393 OF 1988. SECOND APPEAL NO.393 OF 1988. Rangrao Dattatraya Jadhav : Appellant. versus Anandrao Dattatraya Jadhav : Respondent. Mr.A.V.Bandiwadekar for the appellant. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 7th July 2005. DATED : 7th July 2005. DATED : 7th July 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. In this appeal notices were ordered to be issued on 2.8.1988. It is more than 17 years now the appellant has not been able to serve the respondents. There is no ad interim order. There is nothing known about the consequence of the orders of courts below. This is clear case of total negligence. Hence the appeal is dismissed. 2 2 2 [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE]