IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-30932 of 2011 Date of Decision:15.11.2011 Sukhwinder Kaur . . .Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Vijay Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mrr.S.S. Gill, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Darshan Singh, has conceded that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further interrogation. At this stage, learned counsel for the complainant has put in appearance and has opposed the bail application. He has argued that ring and kada was given to the petitioner at the time of marriage which are yet to be recovered. In my view, the ring and kada which have been given at the time of marriage do not fall within the definition of dowry. In view thereof, order dated 13.10.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 15, 2011 JUDGE Vivek