IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25473 of 2010 SUKANTI DEVI, W/o Dinanath Kahar. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 29.07.2010 A supplementary-affidavit has been filed be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner’s son is said to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant in connivance with the present petitioner and other family members. During the hearing of the anticipatory bail application of the co-accused the alleged victim appeared before the court below and stated that she had not been kidnapped and hence he was granted anticipatory bail by the court below itself. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief 2 Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Bihian P.S. Case No. 72 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)