?E?ffi0i\IER$ g,“ cw“ / m THE mag mum OF wmvmURE AT mmwaggwmjiswim: J” wax? Fmmciq Ho 30 ’§ Jweg “ i? Bhagwaim Prasac’: F’atel, Sla. 3hri E’mtwhaEam Pragmi Fat-£1, Ageé 35 yeaw, Ry}. WI}. Tiiaijiaii, RO$Tah3§1£RS Samaxzgayh ixat. Raigewh {(LG} (.3liahe1hi Kumar Pateii, sf a gashe’m‘am Pate}, aageu? ‘34 yeam, weapatisa Upper Division Tz—xaaahar, rg’a Bamihapah’, Past Mmihopali, Tahsi}, $3rgmgwh, Di$§ict Raigarhf€1hh£migaxhj Eihimilal Efraan, Sfr: ‘E‘ggjrmn Uraan, wd 3% years, ocmmafjma Upper Division Taacher, Govt. mwde Schcal Ei$1rmmaiiiBammkgia, ’1’331311 $m‘angaxh, msu’iet Eaigarh gentzanent rfa Viilage Wmar§5h, Ptmt Gatatiih, Tah$iL Saw'émgmha iiigiriafi, Raigm-h {Chhattigath} Summer's: $ing§h Jag&t, a; o Qhamian Singh .3agat, agac‘l 3’7 ygarm amupatinn Hyper Bivigiun Teaehar, Govt. Hr. Sec. Schmi $Wwg {iigzrict Eihgam‘; yermanant: rfa Himage E‘iavayax‘a {Saila}, Taiwil Paii, })iawi¢t K§rb& {Chhmtisgarh} Jgwahar Smgh E’ailmra? sis Late Emrm Epmgh §>aikara,,, aged 32 yaatrzs, (mcupatim: W3 . 9%. 051 3i. g @ xv ‘iguict, EQaigm‘h {Chhaztigmm 3mm: Divighi: *E‘aachm", Govt. Er. Sec. Sahami Bahama, Biiaappur, pammlent If a Vijigge Laimdia, Te§i1$il Pali, District Korba. £(Ehh;§1;£i$gmh; (3%. 3&1; Eawai Bhaxa‘iigs} 0 &§it Ram Bharati, agml 3i: yanm? gagugmtmn {fpimr Dhésiarx Teaéhea Gem. Eir‘ $$¢1 Schaei Kwir, ’Dkti‘yém. Raigsiwh, yarmaxymt 1‘} o girgziagamz 33m: Kgsir, Tahsil, Siarangarh, ygu. t (W. Jay Kamm Sitiar aim 'E‘hamiaram Skim, gigmi 31 years, accu‘gmtimz Uizper Divi&io:1 ’E‘aganher, rg’o V£E3age {Eh’émari Paii, Pzmt kirm‘igX-‘g, Di$ir£at Janjgix Chnmya {flfi'2brzi‘iis‘gah} =35. 3armm'am Ehagai, ${5 Sim; Bhakaau‘mm Ehagah agac‘i 32 yam?” amupatian wiggker Emimim} Taachm‘, Em: Mai-is Bay’é; EcsiaE .Jaghgmm ywmaaent rfa Viiiagf: Goriysitali, Rmt Eiianm‘a, Tahsé} am} Eian'ict ‘3aghpur {Chlmitiagarm 09. Smt. Pmmiia xaxa, wifé of $1n‘i Jowggh Lakc’ia, ageti 32 yxaara, occupau’on Upper Diviaim‘i Temchexg Gum; Hr. $ec. Sohm} SIEégka, biSh-izrf, Bilauwmr, §ermauant 13¢? Kmiamiiachkmr, B3St Chaxaimck ’E‘ahisi JaSLhwnf , gistrict Jashgmr gChbattisggarh} Eiameahwar Eaimgi, s19 Brikhaxam Etaaimgi, agati $2 yeaxx, aceugmtiau Uppar //‘: 7 C? Dimlgitm ?aa.ch¢r, Gavt. 1311‘. Sec. Siihim} Eeitara, pm‘manant fie Viilage Eanclteii, }7‘0st Mamwa, Talmii Jaghpur, District, Jas1hgurmhimtfi$garh§ Ema: Laiicia, ag’a Late Sukhz'm‘m LEhia, agmri $2 yémx, Cewta Uraon, Umwr i}ivi£zitm ’Feaéher, Gavt‘ Higher $ewndary iiémémta Em Biwra, Bimrict Janjgirw Ckam pa, paymaxlent ragi&ené; {if Bagudega, Wa $7‘sa?ihaigmm Diatrict Raigarh {CIR} VER$3€S RESFONDEW1$ ; (H. $‘tat9 af Chhattisgmh, T‘nrmigh gacretaxy, Ewartméznt «3f S$hacfx Etiucafian, EEKS, ‘ BMWmT R5ipur {CuG‘} ‘4} 1 x (ii Directaf, ?ub1ic hiatructionaa, EELS. Bhmgan, Raigmx (C‘Gg ‘g {)3‘ Jami Dixectm, Fuiic hwtructiimig, ‘E‘iiaajmar Divisém}, Bikim {G.} gir C. “WEI? E’ETITIGN UNBER AKRTECLE 2 ’‘‘ iNDw; FOR ESSUAECE GF WRET 1 ‘ CERTEQRAEEJ PRGEIBF’E‘EOI‘I ABE) F03? OTFIER . UETIKBLE WRIT OR wFiri‘Sn <}RDE.R:}£)R QEJ}E§3S,J§IRECTIOM OR BKRECTEON$ g6ff CIF THE CGESIITUTIGN OE THE iéATURE GF MARDAWS, XI-HC—78 HW,W,W WW ‘ ‘ ° mR.3.0.;K/.o.3 1m 200 mm (WW) WW§WW %aq%tr3a1%¥r mmmm 24.11.2006: V Shri Alok Baksi counsel f0! 'the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao GA for the r spondentlState. it is submitted that the f - of this Court to approach the disposal of the petitioners’ cas and question of law involved in the present'petition are the same t that of in Harish Chandra Singh and others Vs. State of Madhya Pra esh and others (Origln‘al Application No. 1452/1 998). The Madhya Prades Administrative Ttibunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 31. .2000, allowed the application of the petitioners therein. Learned cou sel for the petitioners seeks permission pondenwstate for consideration and in terms of the order dated 31.1.2000 ’ passed in the case of Harish Chandra $ingh and adders (supra) by ’ Madhya Pradesh-Administrative ribunal, Jabaipur. 2. Learned counsel appeari with the submissions made by ie med counsel for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the petitio rs are granted liberty to make a representation before the res ondents — State Authorities for their decision on the representation i the light of the order dated 31-1 -2000 passed in the case of Harish Chandra Singh and others (supra) in accordance with law, on its'own erit, within reasonable time. 4. With the above—stated li order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules > Sd/- W” ’7 DHIRENDRA MSHRA Judge fot the respondenB/State fairly agrees rty, this petition stands disposed of. No