@#@#@#@#@#@#@ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NOs: 3936 & 4426 of 2006 DATED: 10-07-2006 W.P.No.3936 of 2006: Between: 1. Smt.Ravuri Suez and 2 others ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Women Development, Child & Disabled Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad and 4 others. .....RESPONDENTS AND W.P.NO: 4426 of 2006 Between: V.Ramulu ..... PETITIONER AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Women Development, Child & Disabled Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad and 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS @#@#@#@#@#@#@ COMMON ORDER: (per BPR, J) Heard both sides. Since common questions are involved in both these writ petitions, they are being taken up together for disposal. Both these writ petitions are filed against the interim orders passed by the tribunal pending disposal of the main application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act. The grievance of the petitioners is that even though they have been regularly appointed, however, but no fault of them, they were sought to be discharged. The case of the respondents is that the project is over and since there are no surplus posts, their services are sought to be discharged. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and on perusal of the material on record, it is not the case of the respondents herein that after the completion of the project work, they have taken any action for abolishing the posts as initially the posts were created at the inception of the project. In view of the same we are not inclined to decline the interim orders granted by this Court and further having regard to the fact that the main application is pending before the tribunal we are not going into the merits of the case. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of directing the tribunal to dispose of both the OAs within a period of one month from the date of receipt a copy of this order. It is needless to mention that the interim orders granted by this Court shall continue to remain in force until the OAs are disposed of. No costs. ___________________ 10th July, 2006 SKM