f'sw^ '^'•^ ^i^.'' HJGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DiVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRl RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. iOM'BL SUiS!!LKU!VlARS!NHA,J. Writ Petition (C»No.2398 of 2008 M/s Shrikishan & Company, Engineers & Contrastors, B-4, Commsrcia! Complex, TP Nagar, Korba, Through Proprietor - Shushil Agrawsl, S/o Late Nshan Agrawai, aged 36 years R/o TP Nagar, Korba, District Korba (CG) VERSUS Respondents South Eastern Coatfields Limited, Through the Chief Managlng Director, SECL, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG) The Director (Technical), South Eastern Coaifieids Lim'ited, Seepat Rosd, Bilaspur (CG) The Generai Manager (Civii), South Eastern Coalfietds Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG) The Chief Generai Manager, South Eastern Coa!fieids Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG) Wrlt Petitjonjinder ArticSe 226 of the Constitution of India Present : None for the petitioner. Dr Shukla, Sensor Advocate v.'ith Ms Ritu Mishra, counsel for the respondents. ORDER (21SI Apri!, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the petitioner. tt. w-Ti ^;?""'.^ '^ /;;o\ '•^^^ ^ 1, k "'l J '^s^y w 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ petltlon for want of prosecution. 3) The writ petition, therefore, Is dlsmissed for want of prosecution. — Sd/- Chief Justice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge