IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( MAIN ) NO. 2 OF 2009 SHRI NAGESHWAR PANDEY THROUGH ATTORNEY ANUP KUMAR SINHA ... Applicant Versus SMT. FERMEENA KHAUNTE AND 6 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar,Senior Advocate with Mr. R. Menezes, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.M.Walwaikar, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 20th January, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the respondent No.3. The Counsel for the respondent No.3 states that all the accused Nos. 1 to 4 had surrendered before the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi. 2. The complainant had moved an application before this Court for cancellation of anticipatory bail that was granted to the accused persons. The said order was set aside by this Court with regard to respondent No.3/ accused Yashpal Raikar. Since the accused Fermina, Pradeep and Ravindra did not appear before this Court on that day, no orders with regard to them, were passed by this Court. 3. In view of the statement made by the Counsel for the respondent No.3 that Fermina, Pradeep and Ravindra have surrendered before the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi and they have been taken into custody by the said Court, this application for cancellation of anticipatory bail, no more survives. In the view of this, this application is filed as infructuous. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA