IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 25666 of 2001 Between: The Rayala Cheruvu Water Users Association, (No.411) Rep.by its Presicent A.V.Brahmananda Reddy Rayalacheruvu Village & Post, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P. Rep.by its Secretary, Irrigation & CAD (PW:APERP) Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation wing, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintending Engineer, Irregation circle, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 4 The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ order or direction, declarig the action of the respondents especially the 3rd and 4th respondents in not entrusting the minimum rehabilitation work of Rayalacheruvu System, C.K.Palli Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District to the petitioner water users Association and also the consequential action of respondents 3 and 4 in issuing a notiﬁcation in Bid No. 11/2001-02 dt, 9-10-2001 in calling for sealed tenders from the intending contractors for executing the said works as illegal. arbitrary, discriminatory and malaﬁde and consequentially direct the respondents to entrust the said work to the petitioner water users association by keeping in view the exact ayacut area of an extent of Ac. 597-86 1/2 cents of the above tank and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.25666 OF 2001 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action does not survive for adjudication in the present writ petition. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________________ P.V.SANJAY KUMAR, J. 15th November, 2008. VGSR