HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.22269 of 2003 Date: 09-04-2007. Between : ICICI Bank Limited, Vadodara, having its Regional Office at Begumpet, Hyderabad. …..Petitioner And Kukatpally Municipality, Kukatpally, rep. by its Commissioner & another. …..Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.22269 of 2003 ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki) Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved of the demand notice dated 23.09.2003 issued to it for paying the advertisement charges and earnest money deposit for the sign board displayed by the petitioner at Kukatpally, according to it, at the petitioner’s business premises. This notice has been challenged on various grounds. Earlier, a Single Judge of this Court decided such matters by a judgment in Kasturi Brothers, Dress Materials and Saree Shop, Hyderabad v. MCH[1]. A Division Bench of this Court, in a judgment in W.P.No.4089 of 2005, dated 10.03.2005 in the case of Andhra Bank Zonal Office, Koti, Hyderabad v. The State of A.P., while setting aside the notice, allowed the petitioner to make a representation and raise all the pleas that are available to him and directed the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. Accordingly, we allow this petition, set aside the impugned notice and allow the petitioner to make a representation and take all the pleas that are available to him in law within a period of two weeks from today. The respondents may decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter. _______________ BILAL NAZKI, J 9th April 2007 _____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J ajr [1] 2007 (1) ALD 481