IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No 2910 of 2011. Date of Decision: 16.09.2011 Anju Bala Vaid ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Monika Chibbar Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1, 2 and 6. Mr. N.P.S.Mann, Advocate, for respondent No. 3 Ms. Anuja Saxena, Advocate, for respondent No. 4 Mr. Ishwar Lal, Advocate, for respondent No. 5 **** SURYA KANT, J.(Oral) The petitioner confines her claim for appointment as a Special Teacher (E.T.T.) who is trained to teach disabled children against a vacant post only. It is stated that certain vacancies are still available and claim of the petitioner can be considered in the light of the reservations made by this Court in the order dated 14.09.2010 passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 9123 of 2009 (Mahesh Kumar V. State of Punjab and others). CWP No 2910 of 2011 [2] Having regard to the nature of the relief so claimed, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment against a vacant post only, if any, in the light of the observations made in Mahesh Kumar's case (supra). Needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A copy of this order be handed over to the learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for information and necessary compliance. Dasti. 16.09.2011 (SURYA KANT) 'ravinder' JUDGE