A @ ^|§l 'jS©ll,$M IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES&ARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. IB , / 2011 Applicants 1. 2. ^^ '?ss ^ %hoiK k^'^vel'r' <^Ha*tk ^upta S/o Late Govind Praasd Gupta, aged about 19 years, Smt. Ramku^i^_Bai &upta W/o Jawaha Prasad Oupta, Agedabout 65 ^XX years.(Since died) \\v^.g\p<<'/ a) Prashant ^upta 'S/o Late ^ovind ^o..>y^<\ . Prasad,©upta;Ac 'X^'^AX ^^TN Prasad ©upta,Aged about 32 yeGrs. ^y^ ^j/y Versus Respondents 1. M"iiiL /s.ij.^. SA ,fcate fiewtd- Prasa<j~ fiupto, A^ed Qbisw^S^years. All are R/o 6upto Paro Aorang, Tohsii <& bistt. kaipur-(C.6.) The New India AssurGnce Co.Ltd., Branch Nationa! Highwoy 7, Near Gurudwara/ C/o ZonGJ Officer, The New India Assurance Co.Ltd,/ Roipur, bistt. Rai^(C^^ ^^ ^Ak^ MariyanujT^To^ S/o R/o Dam Colony, Bargarh (Orissa), presently residing at Stotion Road, Raipur Tahsil <& Distt. Raipur-(C.6.) Shailendra Prasad Gupta S/o Laxms Narayan Gupta, R/o Suhela, P.S. - Suhela, Distt.Bargarh (Orissa), presently R/o Prakash &aroge, StGtion Road, Raipur, bistt.Raipur-(C.6.) APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATCON/CORRECTIQN_OF <^^ 2. 3. CAUSE TITLE ^: HIQH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARM AT BiLASPUR DIV1SIONBENGH: HON'BLEMR. S.M.QUDDUSIS h'ON'BLE MR. NAWAL KISHORE AOARWAL. JJ. M.C.C NQ.119^2011 ApDlicanfs Respondents Vs Ratwjk Kumar Gupta & others The New IndJaAssuranceCo. Ltd. &<y^ \^-/ ^ Present , •-• , . ' , . Mr. S.K.Guha, Advocateforthe appiicants. ORALORDER (24th March, 2011) I.M. Quddusi. J; ^ 1. The appijcants, who are legaj representatives of deceased respondent No;2- Smt. RarnKynwar Bai, have filed this application for modification of fhe order dated 14.9.2010 passed by this Courtjn M.A. No.659/02. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the applicantsand perused the record. 3. It appears that appiication under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC moved by the appejiantfor brjngjngoneof legal heirsQfthe deceased respondentNo.2 i.e. appijcant No.2 herein, was pending when the appeal was dismissed. Therefore, the application for substitution or jegal heirs ofrespondent No.2 shail be deemed to be allowed and the legal heir of deceased respondent No.2 i,e, appliGaht No.2 herein namely Prashant Gupta, son of Late Govind Prasad Gupta, resident of Gupta Para. Aarang. Tahsil & District Raipur, deemed to be substituted in place of deceased respondent No.2- Smt. RamkunwarBai Gupta as respondent No.2. 4. Learned counsel is permitted to carry-out necessary amendments in the cause title ofthe miscej'laneous appeai. 5. Copy of this order be supplied alongwith the copy of order dated 14.9.2010. 8. Certified copyas perrules. Roshan/'- Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge