IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.12265 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. Bishamber Nath and another. ……….Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. ……….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan,Advocate. For the respondent. : Mr.Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his clients have been promoted. Accordingly, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.