C.W.P.No.8088 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 8088 of 2011 Date of Decision:September 22,2011 Rajwinder Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab and others. ...Respondents CORAM; HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.S.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Raghubir Chaudhary, Sr. D.A.G.,Punjab. Mr.R.K.Shukla, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr.Hoshiar Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.20. Alok Singh, J (Oral) The only grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that Revision Petiton filed by the petitioners is not being decided by the concerned Financial Commissioner since he is not holding the Court. Mr.Chaudhary, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab undertakes that revision filed by the petitioners shall positively be decided by respondent C.W.P.No.8088 of 2011 2 No.1 within four months from the date the certified copy is placed before him. In view of the statement made by the Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision petition filed by the petitioners within four months from the date the certified copy is placed before him in accordance with law at its own merits. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh) September 22, 2011 Judge BB