3 Q HIGH GOURT OF JUDI€ATUREGHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR smeLE semi-I : HoN'aLE snm s3. NAVAK, c.J. WRIT PETmON LG} my 53w OF aw? PETITIONERS PLAINTIFFS 1. Smt. sarla Devi. mo. Pmyag, Age 39 years. Wlo. Shiv Charan, at prasant Rio. Tukudand, Tahsil Pratappur District Sarguja (C.G.) 2. Smt. Dashri Dsvi, Dlo. Pmyag; W/o) Nohar Sai, Rlo. Viilage-Ragni, Tahsil Rajpur. District- Satguja (C.G.) 3. Shiv Mangal. S/o. Narkandaj Goad, R/o. Village -'Buda Baghicha, Tahsll Rajpur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) ;1 I 1. Vs. Smt. Chameil' Devi, Dlo. Ptayag‘ Wlo. Ram Kumar, Permanent W0. Villaga» Silphili, Tahsil Kusmi at pramt. RIO. Buda Bagicha. Tahsil‘ Rajpun Distt. Sarguia (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Throughz...collectot Satguja (C.G.) Ambikap’ul'. RESPONDENTS Defendants, Prgsent t shri D.N. Prajapati, leamsd aaunsel fat” he pekitianets. ORAL ORWR Passed on 7“; Novembé r, 2006) Having heard learnad eourisa! for the petihonep, Ii-do not Md any jurisdictional flaw or material irregularity at failure of lush“. The petmon is devoid of merit and iseceordlngly dismissed. However. this order shall not come in the way of the petitioners seeking review of the impugned order before the trial Court itself. Sd!~ Chief Justice (