- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2003 Kishore G. Hinduja ...Applicant vs. 1.State of Maharashtra 2.Chem Mech Engineer Co. 3.The Official Liquidator ...Respondents None for the applicant Ms S.G.Gajare A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 8,2009 : APRIL 8,2009 : APRIL 8,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This revision application was filed by the applicant appearing in person. Office noting shows that as the applicant has not removed the office objections, a letter was issued to the applicant on 7th June 2004 and 15th June 2007 calling upon him to remove the office objections. Further office noting shows that the letter issued by the office to the applicant was returned with postal remark ‘not residing at the given address and the applicant has left the said office before 2 to 3 years.’ Office noting shows that the another letter issued to the applicant on 16th October 2007 is again returned by the postal authority with remark that ‘Applicant has left the place’. As a result, this revision application filed in the year 2003 has remained pending as office objections are not removed. Three letters issued by the Registry to the address of the applicant mentioned in the cause title have been returned unserved with remark of the - 2 - postal authority that the address mentioned by the applicant in the cause title is not correct. 2. In the circumstances, revision application is dismissed for non prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE