HIGH'COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELAS?UR W.P. (227) N0. 599 of2009 Petitioher Rakesh Diwan (Advocaie), aged about 42' years, S/o late Shri Kuleshwardhar Diwan, R/o Shiv Chowk, Ramsagatpara, Ward Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (CG). Versus 1. Asha Diwan, W/o Rakesh ,Diwan, agsd about 28 years. 2. Aishwardhar Diwan, aged abeut 3 years I S/o Shri Rakesh Diwan 3. Vishal Diwan, aged about 4 years, S/o Shri'Rakesh Diwan, Responded: VO 2 & 3 are minors through hrs mother Smt Asha Dxwan (Respondent No 1) ' All Resident of Dak Bangla Ward Dhamtari, Tahsil and Distt. Dharntari (CG). Writ Petition under Articie 227 ofthe Constitution of India (Singie Bench: Hon'bie Mr. N.K. Agarwal. J.) Respondents Present : Shri OR. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri RP. Sahu, Advocate for the respondents. ORAL ORDER - (Passed on 6th day of May, 2009) Shri CR. Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Ist Additional Principal Judge, Family Cou'rg Raipur (Camp Dhanitari), is not giving proper opportunity to the petitioner to adduce his evidence and prays that this petition may be disposed of With a direction to the Ist Additional Princ1pal Judge Family Court Raipur (Camp D/Kamtan} to gain reasonable trne for adducmg his e\ idence Prayer is not opposed by Shri RP. Sahu, counsel for respondents. a ’Tnerefore, it is directed that the Est Additional Frincipal Judge, Family Court, Raipur (Camp Dhamtari) shall give three months time to the petitioner for adducing his evidence, on his behalf The petitioner to supply the copy of order within 20 days. With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs Consequently, pending applications stand disposed of / / l Qqlan \