1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 234 of 2004 RANVIR SINGH V/S UNION OF INDIA & ORS Mr. BASTI CHAND, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. ARUN BHANSALI, for the respondent Date of Order : 10.9.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, perused the impugned orders. Both the learned Courts below have categorically found that sufficient opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and he did not cooperate with the inquiry, and did not avail the opportunities given. I have perused the record and find that the competent authority had also sanctioned 7 days' leave from headquarter to find the defence counsel, and even in the application Ex.12 it is not disclosed, as to for what destination does he need the pass to find the defence counsel. Learned lower appellate Court has clearly cataloged the sequence of events clearly showing that the petitioner had only adopted an attitude of obduracy, and did not cooperate with the inquiry. It has also been found that the inquiry is conducted in his presence. It is not in 2 dispute that even the inquiry was conducted at Abu Road, where the petitioner was posted instead of Ajmer. Admittedly, even after the inquiry report was sent to the petitioner, he did not submit any representation. Considering inter-alia all these circumstances, both the learned Courts below have dismissed the suit. I do not find the appeal to be involving any substantial question of law to vitiate the findings recorded by the learned Courts below. The appeal thus, has no force and is dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/