^^-i,^si?@g?gi?^?^^-.A:^^ ./i^Sw^A^T."^^^ IN THB HIC2I COURT OF JUD^feATURE AT BILASreR(CHHATTISOARH) WRTT pErmoN KES. S2— OP 2003 EETlTKyteR 8 >5tfwahar Lal Slngh, son o£ .•te Shr-1 R.D.SiBgh. aged about 40 years, working as Sub Engineer. (i'WD), AmbikapurBivisi.Gn (B/R) Amblkapur, Dlstriet Sarguja(CG). ^>' 1,.<J^^ ^'«^>-'n.. V E RS U S ^„,»••" RBSPONSENTS :-i-3t^v.- gj); M 1. Unlon ef xndia, threugh the Secretary, BepaEtment o£ Persennel and Tratning, Mlnlstry e£ Hone Affatrs, New Beihi» 2. State of Chhstfelsga?h, through fcheSecretary, Bepartmenfc of PWD,D.K.S.Building,Mantralay, Raipur, (G6) 3. Sngtneer ln ehlef,CTB,Ralpur,(CG). 4» State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Seciretary.Department ef EW>, Vallabh Bbawan.Bhopal,(M.P.) 5. Adviseryeommlttee, Construeted under seetion 71 o£ the M.F.r'e-organlsation Aet, 2006, St.at.e re-organlsatlsn Sell, Vallabh Bhawan,BhoBal,(N.P. ) WRIT HETITION ITNDSR AaTieiBS 226/3^1 GF THE CQNSTITUTIOISr ef INSIA. i.1ii .^'.fi-.- Xt-HC-22 'i .as^f'^'f, ^gst ?b-H ^ff ~^^Si:Kr.s:s&'.&£.-St l- :,'3^rfjt4i%^gBCTfa)^I% • *ff*RnflBwrai ./ue-^>i).:.^ '_^ ^....^....^...........^,...^.,...^^ yw^ 3S^f?^BW''gi%g 31.01.2003 Shn PrashaatMisIiTa, cou4sel for ftie petitioner. Shri V.V.S.MTirthy, Addl. ^taadmg Coimsel £)rUnion of India-respondent No. I. SluiRaubiTSmgh.,.©.A,foi^ Hegrd. The oia.er dated 2.12.2003 petitioiier to fhe State of Madhy^ ofchalleitge ia fhis writ petition. Admittedly, , tshe petkionef had given lus option for allocation. to the SlatB of Madlig'-a Pradesli'and by the orfler impugaed he has been slUbcateil to fhat State aqd has Been asked fo joiti fheref Accordiag provisio.rial aUocation list he diiwh-'S-f ^wvS'^fs^t <R»<ii< ' ^'salsCT sn^tf • respondents No.2 & 3. (Anfiexure P/1) aUocatuig the Pradesli is the subject matter ?(jo the petitioaer, sinee in Ae is Sfaoiwa to befalk)cated to Chliattisgarh, Iie has adautted T^ cbildr^ isi ^ educatKmal institufion at Ambikapur iu th4 hope that lie will be fiaaUy allocated fo the State of XtL(iattisgal'h.'-It is accordingly submitted fhat since he wa^ ^pravisioiiaUy aUbcated fe Clihattisgarh, f6e Authorities wer] to the Sfate of Madhya Pradesh. given aay reyised Qption for b^ing allofcated to the State of Cbhattisgarli. In fhis view of fh^ & not justified ia. aiioGating Iiua Hawever, tbe petrtioner faad nojt ;matter, it Gaiuiot^ie said fhat fhe action in allocatirig the petijtioHcr fa) the State'of^M.P.-to wluch he had opted^ sufifers fiwm][asyiDSxmi^. ^acxa'i^^ in I'^^R^: »( '.^^^.'^ig^p^^^^^^^^^-?6'^^^?':. ;•?? XI-He-22- 'K " ^^®tet§^'!rK*jB.I° (i(8 ^ail^tq;! lfr'3lt»U ^H ^ < < -sKv fa,.TK^ B^tiHIW:.51ta tlie^ppimjeiri of)t:he5Court no case the order. JLS aiade but for interfering with attons 'S&te Or inacte It was next eon.tended tbat corning t6 an end aud examiaatio trequMtig?.hTin^^gi9ia';iii;;A feasf MB .tlie^eitid; afiApnl, 2QQ3 This, oficourse, can be coQsiSeFcta: if a^-proper representation is fhe petitioii • is disgosed <?f regreseiLtatipn for defeintig bis'jcfir sasiQe to^ the coiiGenMd Au(lK>rity:j s&all consider .aiid dispose' it Qf syinRathetic view iu IIle luatter. W^ifh dle obseivafion aad stands disposed of. Consequenftj? Qfad-intenm writ and I.A.No. 197 stand disposed of. ^ Certified copy as pbrrules. :^l^?l4tTf WR^ff ^ fe?t' <fa^$E< '^aifSgiiail^l. _ siace the acadeiiiic sessionis are to/be Eeld, the order teofcM.P.^inay^.toe.deferred. at. ^lse'.lus?Ghildiien' will ^aufier. ^^fhe appiopriate AuthGuity ia thaf regard. Aecoraiagly, )?yifh a directioii that if a (inmg at the place ofpostmg is j^witlMq-ten days from today, it |oil its own llierits by tatelQg^ a Sireefioh/ fhe^writ petitidn 'T, M.W.P.N0.51/2Q03 for graat of 2003 for ui^ent liearuig also Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge '[Tft^F^RaS- ^- -.]—