IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHRATTISGARH AT BILASPUR rlAl\ Writ Petition (S) No. '3>G"2-€5 Of2008 Petitioner: Arvil Tirky s/o Late Shri Daniel Tirky, aged about 31 years, Police Constable, C/o Mrs Elizabeth Tirky, School Teacher, Resident of House of Shri Vijay Mishra, Chhote Atarmuda, Raigarh (C.G.). V/s. Respondents: 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.); 2. The Director General of Police C.G., Police Head Quarters Chhattisgarh, Raipur. .5. ^ Petition under articles 226 ofthe constitution oflndia <J :tt<s~ A_ \ y^ -1__T5'ai'*tTClu1 om n-F +ITI /t--t->-n±.i ^r"-', :^^f'^^^s-f'ist^^^i^aeiesSSiSt aassatBi %u •i,-4—q|A||i7)q^grilyiio, rqcfl'-iy M^^).]^.-.^Q?-Q/. S^V T^T (i^fg^ii) :TO7T^iTf'~'W ^ww^igNq; wiwatCTsi^i S.B: Hon'ble Justice Prltlnktr Diwaker Shri U-N. Awasthi, learnedl oinna, coun&ci ior uw pcuiioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, iearned oi.oie/sc&pui iu!c;iii&. Counsei for the petitioner ^ No. ubmits that so far as the relief is concerned, the same tfias become Infructuous as after the issuance of the impugned ord petitioner was issued- He howe' not been paid salary of a particui be Dermitted to make representati in the eventuality of such reDreserftation, the Authoritv be directed to decide the sams. Counse! for the State has tko obiection, if petitioner makes a reDresentation to the Competert that this wouid be decided as per t i=hl's<i<i"^i ^w^rf ^f f^^ <f^^K ^3iRTII3:11^T Senior Counsel with Shri M.K. Advocate Generai for the br, another transfer order of the i/er. SLibmits that Detitioner has ^r period and therefore he may ion to the respondent No. 2 and Authoritv: he however submits he eiiaibiiitv of the Detitioner- Accordinaiv. the writ oetition is dismissed as withdra with the ilbertv as aforesaid. Rep •esentation, if anv. made bv the Detitioner shail be decided bv ftie respondent No- 2 vvithin a oeriod of three months from thfe date of receipt of this order strictiy in accordance with iaw. j '— - g^y. j pritinkerDiwaker ] Judge