{1} ao4711.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.47 OF 2011 Rahul s/o Balasaheb Salve Appellant Versus Abhay s/o Govind Parad Respondent Mr.A.S.Zarekar, advocate for the appellant. Mr.L.B.Ghoderao, advocate for respondent CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 01 st April, 2011 PER COURT: 1 This Appeal from Order can be disposed of on recording a statement made by learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, that his client does not wish to alienate the vehicle during pendency of the suit. 2 An application was presented by the appellant before the trial Court requesting the Court to keep the vehicle in its custody till disposal of the suit as well as seeking a direction clamping restraint against the respondent – original defendant from alienating the vehicle in question, during pendency of the suit. The trial Court has rejected the application in view of the order passed on 19.08.2010. {2} ao4711.odt 3 Learned Counsel for the respondent makes a statement that his client does not wish to alienate the vehicle during pendency of the suit. 4 In this view of the matter, statement made by the respondent is accepted. Appeal from Order stands disposed of in view of the statement made by the respondent. The trial Court is directed to decide the pending suit expeditiously. R.M.BORDE JUDGE ******* adb/ao4711