IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * R.A No.311 of 2006 in C.W.P NO. 11441 OF 2006 Date of decision : November 10, 2006 * * * * * Jaswinder Singh ............Petitioner Vs. Indian Oil Corporation & others ...........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S BHALLA Present: Mr. C.L Pawar, Advocate for the applicant. * * * * * Viney Mittal, J. (Oral) Vide order dated July 28, 2006, keeping in view the fact that disputed questions of fact were involved for determination in the writ petition, which could not be determined for want of evidence, we had relegated the petitioner to seek his remedies before the Civil Court. The present application has been filed by the writ petitioner claiming that the writ petition be disposed of on merits. After hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant, we do not find any justification to recall the order dated July 28, 2006. Dismissed. ( VINEY MITTAL ) JUDGE November 10, 2006 ( A.N JINDAL ) ritu JUDGE