THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2235 of 2010 (Dated : 15-12-2010) Between: Reddy Surya Rao @ Gunmmileru Mandapeta Mandal, EG District …Petitioner A n d State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2235 of 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 3.11.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.72 of 2010 in S.C.No.123 of 2008 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Ramachandrapuram, whereby and whereunder, learned Assistant Sessions Judge dismissed the application filed by the accused under Section 91 Cr.P.C read with Rule 195 of Criminal Rules of Practice. 2. The petitioner herein filed petition before the trial Court seeking the following relief:- “ Therefore, the purported dying declaration of G.Vijaya Lakshmi (victim/deceased) recorded by the IV Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada filed in S.C.N64/2009 as well as the scene observation report and sketches (marked as Exs.P.7 and P.13) in S.C.64/09 should be send for in to this case in the interest of justice”. 3. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge permitted the petitioner to file certified copy of the scene of offence and observation report and rough sketch of the scene of offence. With the above observation, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge proceeded to dismiss the application, by order dated 3.11.2010. The said order is assailed in this revision. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent- State and perused the order impugned in the revision. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the rough sketch and scene observation report are essential to substantiate the defence set up by the petitioner/accused herein and therefore, they are required to be summoned from SC 64 of 2009. 6. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge permitted the petitioner to get the certified copies of observation report and scene of offence and to mark the same on his behalf. Such is the permission accorded by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, there is no need of summoning the original documents from the file of SC. No.64 of 2009. The order passed by the trial Court does not suffer from any illegality or irregularity warranting interference by this Court in exercise of powers under Section 397 & 401 Cr.P.C. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.15-12-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2235 of 2010 (Dated : 15-12-2010)