^liOi;;' WB-^ ^ ^^'^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU^JCGJ 1 WRIT PETITION N0.^ \ ^-?-/2005 PETITIONER ^ <r. .^< ^^"- ^.;^>"" ..^^^>" ^^'" ^ RESPONDENTS ^0'00^ ^F:^-1 ?ua rc^z^ "•t;-^^^ """^'^. <,7j-., "--^ ^Cs; ^ Beer Singh Karsal, Son of|Shri Nan Dau Karsal, aged about 32 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Primary School Badkatola (Salhekota), Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS i „ 1. State ofL Chhattisyarh, 1 i Through: The^l^ Se^retary,, ,/7 C^o— Department of S€vtt^or Edi.iC(lt4en^ Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). 2. Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). i I, 1 ^ 3. The Addifional Col|l^ctor, Pendra Road, District Bilasptir (C.G.). I : <^4. The District Education Officer, Education District Bilaspur (C.G.). / 5. Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur (C.G.). ^" WRIT PETITION -UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THG NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-78 *ITI-i€i5T^^TT^ ^£r^TPT[c5?T,U>TTII<-I<I<?, Rlril<(-l^ . W^S,..gJ:7.^j.^w^^200 3?T^$TcRTf^Tfc^ ^aSffSTT^STipqtcp ^' .; f ^ 3TT^$T CRra? (^rfg^) g^fT^R ^rflpT 3?7^^T 24.10.2005 Shri P.P. Saliu, coiuis< Shri Paiikaj Shrivasl advaiice copy, Heard. Leariied counsel for f }1 for fhe petitioner. |iva, Paiiel Lawyer for the State on relates to regularization of Kai-mi, Grade-III. F1e fxirtlier submits tl^ be given aii opportunity to f|l€ conipetent authority aiid th( to dispose oftiie saaie with4^ Court. Tliis limited prayer petitioner is aot opposed by The prayer is aJlowed. Ifso advised, the petit|€ raisuig all grievalices beforej representatton is fUed withjii along witii the certiiied CG] petition, fhe conipetent autl^ as possible preferably withit|L :f51big/ receipt of tlie said rep( Witli the aforesaid ol^ disposed of. Certified copy as per ^ |ie petitioner submits fhat the matter ^he petitioner on tlie post of Shiksha cps^fo<Ti<i ^Mc^T^ffe^^^K ^srf^rgn^sT |at for the preseiit, the petitioner may £pe a detailed representation before the corapetent autliorit}7 Biay be directed the stipulated period graiited by this 4iade by the leanied couiisel for the |the leanied counsel for the State. [oner may file a detailed represeutation |the competent autliority aiid if such a a period of one inonth froin today )y of tliis order axid copy of the writ ority shall dispose ofthe saaie as early a period of 3 iiionUis from the date of resentatlon. |servations, Uiis petitioii staiids fciaUy iles. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge