Crl. Misc. No. M-31619 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-31619 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 20.05.2011 Amarjit Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Ashu Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. P.S. Mann, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Learned counsel for the respondent-State on the basis of reply filed submits that after the investigation in the case, cancellation report was prepared and presented before the Court but the same was not accepted and order for reinvestigation was passed. Learned counsel further submits that in the reinvestigation, the girl has made a statement before the Police on 25.4.2011, wherein, she has stated that she is residing with her husband happily as per her own sweet will. Learned counsel also submits that now after recording the statement of the girl, the allegations as levelled by the petitioner are found to be false and a cancellation report would be submitted before the Court.. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the Crl. Misc. No. M-31619 of 2010 (2) respondent-State, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail an alternative remedy. Dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty. May 20, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE