1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1408/2007 Sher Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 26.3.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. D.L. Mothsara, for the petitioner/s. Mr. Roshan Lal on behalf of Mr. Pritam Solanki for the respondents. ... To challenge the order dated 5.2.2007 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur this petitioner for writ is preferred. In brief facts of the case are that vide an order dated 7.11.2005 the petitioner was transferred from Naggi, Sriganganagar to Meghna in District Hanumangarh vice respondent Mahaveer Prasad. An order dated 30.1.2007 was passed subsequently transferring the petitioner from Meghna to Naggi in district Sriganganagar. The transfer aforesaid was also effected vice respondent Mahaveer Prasad. To challenge the order dated 30.1.2007 the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal and that came to be rejected by the order impugned dated 5.2.2007. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner while assailing validity of the order impugned is that the Tribunal failed to appreciate that the order of transfer dated 30.1.2007 was passed only to 2 accommodate the respondent Mahaveer Prasad at Meghna, and thus, the same was not in administrative exigency. Having considered the record available and the order impugned I do not find any foundation to substantiate the allegation of extraneous consideration while effecting transfer of the petitioner. The petitioner was working at Meghna in pursuant to the order dated 7.11.2005 and after a lapse of about 1 year and 3 months he was transferred from Meghna to Naggi. Merely on the count that the petitioner was transferred to Naggi vide respondent Mahaveer Prasad no interference relating to extraneous consideration or malafides can be drawn, as such, the order passed by the learned Tribunal does not suffer from any error that may warrant interference of this Court in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition for writ is having no merit, and therefore, the same is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal