IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.56 of 2009 Amrendra Pratap Singh, son of Sri Gouri Shankar Singh, resident of Ramchandra Bhawan, Mohalla Gewalbigha, PS Rampur, Dist. Gaya .. Appellant / Petitioner. Vs. 1. Nageshwar Yadav, son of Late Leela Yadeav, 2. Nilesh Kumar, son of Sri Nageshwar Yadav, village Piparghatti, PS Dobhi,Dist. Gaya. 3. Sudarshan Kumar, son of not known, village Aura, PS Dobhi, Dist. Gaya.. Opp.Party. 2 19.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellants. The appellants have challenged the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya acquitting opp. Parties 2 and 3 for offences alleged to have been committed under sections 465 and 468 of the Penal Code. The case of the prosecution is that a Bai Beyana was executed on 1.6.1999 by Nageshwar Yadav, opp. Party no.1 (against whom the case is not being pressed) and subsequently two sale deeds were executed by Gauri Shankar in favour of son of opposite party no.1 and his father. Oppsite Party no.3 is the deed writer. The court below has found that no offence has been made out to show that opposite party no.1 was in connivance with Gauri Shankar who is executant of the deed. It is alleged that an interpolation was made in the deed by inserting another plot of land. In such a case the relief can only be by way of filing a suit. On perusal of the judgment and the order passed by the court below I find that there are cogent reasons given for acquitting opposite parties 2 and 3 and as such this special leave to appeal is dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)