1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2004/2011 (Raju R. Yelane and others .vs. State of Mah. And others. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 16, 2011 Heard Advocate Shri A.Z. Jibhkate for the petitioners and Additional G.P. with Shri A.S. Sonare, learned AGP for respondents no.1 to 4. Service upon respondent no.5 is dispensed with at the risk of the petitioners. Shri Jibhkate, learned counsel for the petitioners states that Government has taken decision on 15.3.2011 and directed respondent no.2 to entertain all appeals whether they are filed by employees who are approved or not approved. He points out that in Writ Petition No. 4388/2010, on 31.3.2011 the learned AGP made similar statement and in view of that statement, the petition was disposed of. In view of the communication dated 15.3.2011 and the order dated 31.3.2011 produced before us, it is apparent that appeal filed by the present petitioners needs to be considered by respondent no.2 on merits. Hence respondent no.2 shall proceed with consideration 2 of that appeal on merits and attempt to decide it finally at the earliest. With this direction, present writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE halwai