IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8636 of 2008 Between: 1 L.Jaya Reddy S/o.Late Raghava Reddy R/o.Masthan Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 2 K.Subrahmanyam @ Sankar S/o.K.Raja Gopal Naidu R/o.Gatchibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Ravi S/o.P.V.V. Rao R/o.Gatchibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Sattar S/o.Waheed R/o.Gatchibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Station House Officer, Rayadurg Police Station, Rayadurg, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy Dist. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.RADHA KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioners to the Police Station and insisting on petitioner No.1 to settle the civil dispute pertaining to land comprised in plot Nos.22, 220, 126, 127/A, 223, 221 and 128/A in Survey Nos.69 and 70 of Gatchibowli Village, Serlingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, stated that the respondents have not been interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondents in Writ Petition No.6236 of 2008 in any manner. In view of this statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the respondents are directed to refrain from interfering with the civil disputes and the life and personal liberty of the petitioners in connection there with. Liberty is given to the petitioners to approach jurisdictional Magistrate with a private complaint, if in future the respondents interfere with the civil disputes as referred to supra. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.11451 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 21st APRIL, 2008 kvni