1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.549 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-9. ...Appellant vs. M/s.BDH Industries Ltd. ...Respondent. --- Mr.Suresh Kumar, for Appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan, for Respondent CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED:15th September,2008. P.C.:- 1. Admit. Heard finally by consent of parties. There are four questions raised by the Revenue. Counsel for the Revenue does not press question (A). 2. So far as the questions of law at (B), (C) 2 and (D) are concerned, both the parties agree that for want of particulars, the issue be remanded back to the Assessing officer for denovo consideration. Accordingly, the orders passed by the authorities below are set aside in so far as they relate to Questions at (B), (C) & (D) are concerned & remanded back for denovo consideration. Appeal is allowed accordingly with no order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)