IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44779 of 2010 1. NOOR HUSSAIN S/O ANAMUL 2. JANGALI YADAV S/O LATE KADAM LAL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that at best it would be a case of the petitioners having been last seen with the alleged victim. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 58/2003, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be local in nature since the petitioners belong to Katihar and the other bailors shall be the brother/father/wife of the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish 2 information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)