Crl. Misc. No.M-19448 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-19448 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 12, 2010 Baljit Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Amit Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The main contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner as Gram Sewak had been relieved on July 26, 2006 and the allegations against him are that he had entered into a conspiracy with Tara Singh, Ex-Sarpanch after March 25, 2007. I have heard counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of the first- charge annexure P-7 indicates that the charge framed against the petitioner Crl. Misc. No.M-19448 of 2010 [2] is that before and after March 25, 2007 he had entered into a conspiracy to commit the offence under Sections 409, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC. Counsel for the petitioner wants to satisfy this Court that there are no allegations pertaining to period prior to March 25, 2007. In the present case, the charge has been challenged without placing on record the other material which forms part of the report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. The plea of the petitioner that he has been charged for an offence for a period during which he was not holding the post of Gram Sewak, can be better appreciated on the basis of the documents which have been attached with the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. No ground is made out for interference in the order of framing of charges. Dismissed. However, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the legality and propriety of the order framing charges by availing an alternative remedy alongwith an application for condonation of delay. July 12, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE