IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1787 of 2007 UMESH PRASAD BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02. 09. 2009. A rejoinder to the show cause filed on behalf of Opposite Party No. 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4566 of 2001 on 08. 03. 2007 has been complied with by considering the representation filed by the petitioner as it would appear from order contained in Memo No. 2460, dated 09. 08. 07 (Annexure-B) to the show cause disposed of the representation giving salary for the difference period admissible to the petitioner was accepted and payment was made. Accordingly, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same is accordingly disposed of. It is submitted by the petitioner that in case any claim of the petitioner still found to remain unpaid, petitioner proposes to file a representation and pursue the matter departmentally. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)