THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No.13393 of 2006 DATED:10.07.2006 Between: Arukala Pushpamma ..Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. and others. ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No.13393 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner is statedly pattadar and owner of an agricultural land bearing survey No.283, admeasuring Acs.8.15 guntas situated at Kongara Khurd Village, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. She purchased the land through a registered sale deed, dated 20.10.2003. She sold the above said land to one Vittal Reddy and had taken part consideration from him, as advance. It is alleged that when she approached the second respondent for registration of the sale deed, he refused to register the same on the ground that there is a complaint given by Darga Hazarat Syed Shah stating that the lands situated in Kongara Khurd Village are the inam lands of the said Darga and that no sale deed will be accepted for registration. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General). It is no doubt true that when a document is presented, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to examine the same with reference to Sections 31 to 36 of the Registration Act, 1908 (the Act, for brevity) and/or Rules 26 and 58 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Act. The communication sent by any Revenue Official cannot be basis for rejection. This aspect of the matter was considered by my learned brother Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy in W.P.No.15199 of 2004, dated 01.9.2004. Following the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent or any other Registering Officer to accept the document presented by the petitioner and consider for registration. Be it noted, if for any reason, the document presented is not registered, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to record and furnish reasons under Section 71 of the Act. No costs. If ultimately the land is found to belong to Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board, this order shall not preclude the Wakf Board from taking action to claim its property as per the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Wakf Act, 1995. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 10.07.2006 GJ