(1) WP. 6080.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6080 OF 2010 Balbhim Saybanappa Patil .. Petitioner VERSUS Manikrao Sharanappa Patil and others .. Respondents Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the respondent no.1 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned counsel. The petitioner is original defendant who filed Application seeking impleadment of the State of Maharashtra as a party on the ground that certain amount of compensation has been withdrawn by him on furnishing an undertaking. The trial Court rejected the Application (Exh.251) filed in the suit (R.C.S. 121 of 1993). Respondents seek re-opening of partition and also claim their share in the compensation paid in respect of the acquired land. Presence of the State of Maharashtra in the suit is not at all necessary for final and (2) WP. 6080.2010 effective adjudication of the suit and, therefore, the Application filed by the petitioner falls outside the pale of Order 1 Rule 10 Sub-Rule (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. No interference called for. Petition dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp