IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25400 of 2009 1. SUNDAR DEVI 2. Amari Kumari Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 13.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no. 2 is said to be a minor girl has privilege for better treatment and for that Juvenile Justice Board is there. So, his prayer for bail is rejected. She is directed to appear before the Court below where her case is pending to get her age assessed. Thereafter, petitioner no.2 is directed to appear before the Juvenile Justice Board for grant of bail. With the above observation and direction, the prayer of petitioner no.2 is rejected. As about petitioner no.1, I am also of the view that petitioner is victim of the act of his son who love informant’s daughter and married also may not be recognized by the law, but her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. is sufficient to conclude that she was in love affair with son of petitioner no.1. Accordingly, the payer of the petitioner no.1 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Shyampur Bhataha P.S. Case No. 18 of 2009, above named petitioner no. 1 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sheohar, District Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)