IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3869 of 2011 Sumitra Devi And Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 4th July 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners along with others have been named by father of the deceased namely, Gudan Ram responsible for committing murder of the decased, Usha Devi whose dead body was found later on being floated in the river. Contentions on behalf of the petitioners are that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that all the petitioners happen to be in-laws, i.e., Gotni and Nanad of the deceased having no connection. They have been named for the omnibus character of allegation only to fulfill his personal vendetta. On the other hand, learned APP opposed the prayer and submitted that the death was on account of protest made by the deceased over illicit relationship between Soni Devi, petitioner no.2 with the husband of 2 the deceased. However, so far as status of petitioner no.4, Rekha Devi is concerned, she happens to be a married Nanad. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner no.4, Rekha Devi is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in Gayaghat P.S. Case No. 130/2010 in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of fortnight subject to the condition as laid down under Section 432(2) of the Cr.P.C. With regard to remaining petitioners, I am not inclined to enlarge them on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer is refused. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)