BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15860 of 2011 1 LAKSHMANAN 2 MUTHUKUMAR 3 SIVA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.7,9 AND 10 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLIYOOR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT. (CR.NO.601/2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1, A9 and A10 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 427 and 379 I.P.C r/w Section 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Public Property Damages and Loss Act, in Crime No.601 of 2011 and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.S.Ragaventhre, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the co-accused had already been released on anticipatory bail by this Court on 22.11.2011 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14869 of 2011 and the petitioners / A9 & A10 are juveniles and if for any reason, the petitioners are entitled for anticipatory bail, stringent condition may be imposed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the co-accused had already been released on anticipatory bail by this Court on 22.11.2011 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.14869 of 2011 and the petitioners / A9 & A10 are juveniles. This Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the first petitioner / A7 is directed to be released on bail in the event of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ arrest or on his apperance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor and on exeucting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, he appear before the respondent police and when required for interrogation. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners / A9 and A10 are released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Juvenile Justice Board, Tirunelveli on executing a bond by one of their respective parents for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties that may be preferably one of them be the other parent, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of Presiding Officer of the Juvenile Justice Board, Tirunelveli. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned and Juvenile Justice Board, Tirunelveli respectively within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 07/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VALLIYOOR, TIRUNELVELI DIST. 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE PRESIDING OFFICER, JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD, TIRUNELVELI 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALLIYOOR POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DT. +1. CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.42840 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15860 of 2011 Date :07/12/2011 SMA/12.12.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/