IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 1120 of 2009(N) IN WPC.557 of 2009 ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.557/2009 Dated 22/10/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------- 1. M/S.ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, ECE HOUSE, 28A, KASTHURBHA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI. 2. M/S.ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, ECE HOUSE, 28A, KASTHURBHA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, C.ANILKUMAR, ECE INDUSTRIES LIMITED, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SABU S.KALLARAMOOLA RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER: ------------------------- G.SOMAN, MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL AKASH, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV.SRI.D.SAJEEV THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- R.P.NO.1120 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C).NO.557 OF 2009 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of November, 2009 O R D E R Heard. Paragraph 3 shall be corrected and substituted as “I heard the counsel on both sides.” The last but one sentence in paragraph 2 shall be corrected in the manner indicated hereunder: That sentence, which reads as “Both the applications moved by the defendant were dismissed vide Ext.P3 order” shall be deleted, and in lieu thereof, it is to be stated as thus: “The application, I.A.No.6640 of 2008, the review petition was allowed subject to terms, and the application I.A.No.6759 of 2008 for staying of the suit was dismissed, both vide Ext.P3 common order”. Judgment shall stand corrected as indicated above, and the review petition is accordingly disposed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp