JN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATH‘ISGARH AT 2 BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITOMS) No. éaL/zom ' ‘ $ X 1 K 3 I I 1 I >ETITIONER : / 1. ‘ Gopal Krishna Sonwani, V P S/o Tejram Sonwani, aged >7 about R/o PO— Aurda Via Konda arai, District Raigarh (0Q)! ! 2. Bhuvnéshwar, S/o Firfat Ram, aged about_3.i - R/o Viillage Karumaoha, P.O. Basnajhar, Tahsil- Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.)' Versus / 1. State o‘f Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Depattment of Higher Education, D.K.S.r Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Public Service Commis Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : ;WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’T‘hqt ma “Q+:+:A.. M. <L a5p 7,, \O LJM , sion, GH aoum‘ OF CHHAmSGARH gl Wm Penman (S) No 602 ammo ani 5 ts Gopal Knshna So '8 oher gspondénts Versus ‘ State _ of Chhattlsg h & anoer Rié 4 a th on under Amcle 226 ofthe Co stltution ofmam (SB Hon’blc Shn Satish K. Agmhotn J) r “s AnJu AhuJa, Advocate for the penuoncrs M “Shn M P S Bhatla, Deputy Govt Advocate for m responents. } o Emn o n n ron ‘ ( hi‘ dy Ff 0 § V Passed on ts9h a ofebruaIy, 201,) ‘ } Heard. ' l ppg f th p its, learned counse aearm or e etrhoners, on nsrucnon submns tat he petmonars see pmmsomn o th1s out h t k f Cr to . er ‘ > mthdraw this petmon, w1th liberty to take rocouxse to oth ~, forum whatever may be available to Learned counsel appeanng for the respondentsIState has §obJect10n. In mew of the above the wnt eution 1s1iism1ssed as Withdraw § , p n. z w1th the above-stated lerty. ‘g order aso costs. ib N t etltioners. , Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri: Judge —CL? m mspUR " 1 m ) d " p r