IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2000 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ARUNKUMAR DHAVALE AND OTHERS Versus INDIA INSTITUTE AND ANOTHER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: M/S NJ MEHTA ASSO. for Petitioners MR KS NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1, 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 22/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Shahani for the petitioners states under instructions from petitioner Nos.1 and 2 that in view of the fact that the persons whose names appear at Annexure 'A' showing the duty schedule, except for one Mr.Nair, all other persons have been transferred out of the Telephone Section of the respondent-employer and, hence, the said persons do not have any grievance because they are not concerned any more with the subject matter. Insofar as Mr.Nair is concerned, it is further stated that Mr.Nair appears to be satisfied with the duty schedule. In view of these circumstances, it is submitted that the petition has become infructuous and Mr.Shahani seeks permission to withdraw the same. Permission granted. The petition is rejected as being infructuous. Interim relief stands vacated. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. (D.A.Mehta, J) 'Bhavesh'