IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.89 OF 2004 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPLICATION (L) NO.1 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai .. Applicant. V/s. M/s.Vikram Ispat Limited .. Respondents. Mrs.S.V. Bharucha i/b. Mr.T.C. Kaushik for the applicant. Mr.Sachin Chandarana with Ms.Rajlaxmi Nair i/b. M/s.M.K. Ambalal & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & CORAM : R.M. LODHA & CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED : 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED : 2ND MAY, 2006. P.C. : Though the affidavit in support of the notice of motion is not very satisfactory, yet for the broad reasons stated therein, we are satisfied that the appellant-applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the Central Excise Application in time. 2. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the central excise application belatedly. 3. Office to process the central excise application and post the same for admission. 4. The notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)