IN 1 Hf.. 11101-I ( ul N i OK K \N\AT-\KA (INtl. II 3I\tII TDIIRA I) D\1ED iLII 1111 2s IM\ of .11... LV ..‘ul - 13fY( )RE THE IIt;NTILE IR JLSTICE B \ .PI\TO CRIMINAL PETITION \o.. 2S 201() Bet ten. Mukutid 4ppara Pui Ii 1k Age: 2’ sears. Oct : Piit s’ Au ekoch Shit all L-Ilittkal. Kar” air. . [‘ciii iont r (B Shri N U Jaed cIocatcJ And: The State b Rural Police. Hhatkal Rep. b SPP. Hi.h C’c;un. Circuit Bciwh, Dizaiwad. . Res 1, Ii mu iL3 Slit, Anand htm,ar Na ilcsnnutli. II C.’ C P Ibis raa’’ ‘;i put H on is t:leJ n’ In See: io: i 4—.) ut thc Cc) Ic c I (‘rirnu, al Pro c J ii seek ,. ‘ to c tist ‘F, enlirt prnccecInzzs i 1 s’ ji ;‘ c1 iit’; n’ 1:r ;w::tt’ uiu: L’ the learned \Iagisti aft b3 issuin p1 oc ess at summon’ against tlw put tjr,nc’r t at i npllt at urn :::rn as a red ii. C’ C’.’o 2oi IOU’). pencl nç lwicn. thc J U I’ C Shaikal This erimi ml pc titian coming cnu for orders thus dan . the (‘nun made thc following: ) ORDER Heard on Miscellaneous Criminal No.1o201 2u1 1. 2. This application is filed for recalling the order dated 14.06.201 1 dismissing the petition for default. 3. Perused the affidavit. The order dated 14.06.201 1 is recalled. Miscellaneous Criminal No.16021/2011 is alloed. 4. Heard Shri R.M.Javed. learned counsel appeanng for the petitioner and Shri knand Kumar Navalgimath. learned High Court Go eminent Pleader for the respondent - State 5. This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.44 ‘2008 of Bhatkal Rural Police Station. registered for the offence punishable under Section 435 of the Indian Penal Code. On thc basis of the complaint of one Ramachandra Go ardhan Puranik. the Bhatkal Police registered the abo’e case on the ground that on 24.03.2008. he had slept at about 10:00 p.m. in his house. He got up at 02:30 rn and tA 3 saw that three motor neics ere set fire bctccii 10:00 p.m. to 02:30 a.m. on the same night b3 opening the petrol car and have caused damaged of Rs.45.000 The Police hate conducted the inestigation and hate filed the charge sheet against the petitioner. 6. On a perusal of the entire material on record. including the charge sheet. there is absolutel3 no abuse of process of la and no miscarriage ofjustice has been caused. The matter is of trial and the petitioner is at libert3 to urge for discharge and the learned Magistrate is directed to take into account the submissions made by the petitioner at the time of hearing arguments for discharge. The petition is dismissed. The learned Magistrate is directed to clispost- 1)1 the matter as cant as possible, subject to the cooperation of the petitioner during the trial. Sd! JUDGE Rsh