IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26832 of 2010 1. UPENDRA SAH son of Kishori Sah 2. Lalan Sah son of Nandu Sah 3. Krishna Nandan Sah son of Ram Bahadur Sah 4. Sakindra Sah son of Ram Bahadur Sah 5. Ramnath Sah son of late Sahdeo Sah 6. Dashrath Sah son of Rohan Sah 7. Bindeshwar Sah son of Dashrath Sah----------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.8.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Informant’s son disappeared on 17.6.2008. Allegation against the petitioners is that they came to the informant and told that they had kidnapped his son for ransom of Rs. 2 lacs. Same is doubted on the ground that earlier to the disclosure an application was given by the informant on 17.6.2009 near about a year of the incident to the police to search his son and according to the learned counsel, now some dispute cropped up the incident of missing of the boy is turned to a kidnapping. Otherwise, there can be no probability of such disclosure only after two years of the incident. If really ransom was the reason for kidnapping that should be demanded earlier. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Dumra P.S. case no.93 of 2010 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal 2 Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J ) a