1 87 ao.277.11 ors ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NOS. 277, 278, 279 & 280 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. D.Shah i/b Mr.Vimla and Company for the Appellants. Mr. E.A.Sasi for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rajiv Narula i/b Jhangiani Narula and Company for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 25 th April, 2011. P.C. 1 The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 on instructions states that Respondent No.1 is filing a writ petition in this Court seeking a direction for demolition of the suit garage. On instructions, he states that Respondent No.1 will not dispossess the Appellants and will not demolish the suit garage without following due process of law. He also states that till the Appellants are dispossessed, the Respondent No.1 will not obstruct the entry of the Appellants to the suit garage. The statements are accepted. In view of these statements, considering the prayers made in the notice of motion, it is not necessary to entertain these appeals. 2 87 ao.277.11 ors 2 Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of. All contentions of the parties on merits of the pending suit are kept open. 3 It is made clear that the suit and the notice of motion will be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the impugned order and without being influenced by the aforesaid statements made by the Respondent No.1 4 Pending civil applications do not survive and the same are disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]