(2^ <7 1 BEFORE THE H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) ,^?SJ W.P.(S)No.' '-' of 2009 PETITIONER << ^' ^^^ Nanik Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Padum Lal Sahu, agedabout 41 years, Shiskha Karmi Verg-III, Primary School Rakshapathra Block-Mainpur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh ^mul^ ^•>-<^ '\. w*v-- '/ ^-7''-^\ (•s.n,.i,^^^| Through-The Secretary Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ^" 2) District Education Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3) Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mainpur (C.G.)^^ ^r^^ ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRJT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. s HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 7343 of2009 Nanik Ram Satau. RESPOJSQOENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgaA & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST!TUTIQN QF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Sattah K. Atguhotri. J. Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava^ Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemm^it Advocate fortfie St^e. Shri Arun Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 29th day of January, 2010) 1. Leamed coumel appearing for the respondent No. 3 submite that the impugned termination order dated 10.12.2009 (Anx^xure P/l) has been recalled by order dated 22.12,2009 (Annexure A to the retum filed by respondent No. 3) and as such, nolhing survives for adjudication. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionw does not controvert the above submission. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infinctuous. ——— Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Amit