IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15461 of 2010 NARENDRA KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 05.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The question whether the petitioner was served a show cause notice to enable him to reply leading to his suspension, is primarily his defence and a question of fact. It can be examined by the authorities only if the petitioner so desires by filing a representation for revocation on that ground. Counsel for the state rightly submits that if a representation is filed it is required to be disposed expeditiously. There is no question for the Court to interfere with the order of suspension. This application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)