IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8119 OF 2009 Nanaji s/o Gunwantrao Patil & others ... PETITIONERS VERSUS Kamalbai Maharudra Gite & others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri J.M. Murkute, Advocate for petitioners – absent Shri Milind Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 6 ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 6th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Milind Patil, learned counsel for the respondents. He informs, the matter is not diligently attended by learned counsel for the petitioner, supported from Court record. Exhibit 42 is under challenge. The defendants requested to stay proceedings of Regular Civil Suit No.233/2008 due to pendency of Special Civil Suit No.31/2006. Matter in issue in both the suits is identical. The Court stayed Regular Civil Suit No.233/2008. The order specifies that Regular Civil Suit No. 233/2008 deals with right, title and intrest of defendants, who are plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.31/2006. In the situation, the order of the learned Judge, dated 5.8.2009, allowing Application Exh. 42, staying Regular Civil Suit No.233/2008 does not call for any interference. Writ Petition dismissed no costs. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/wp8119.09