4^ u WQH GOURT OF CHHATTSSQARH: BiLASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 773 of 2008 Petstioners 1) R.K. Patei, S/o. Late Shri B.P. Patel, Aged about 60 years, Lecturer (Eiectrloal Department), Korodimal Govt. Polytechnic CQilsge, Raigarh (CG). 2) KamSesh Kumar Majumdar, S/o. Shri Kumudinlkant Majumdar Aged gbout 60 years, Lecturer (Civii Engineering), Kirodjmaj Govt. Polylechnic Coilege, Ralgarh (C.G.) Versvs 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through th@ Secretaw Technica! Education, Manpower PIannlng, Science and TechnoSogy Department, D.K.S. Bhav^an, Raipur(CG). ResRon.clents 2) Director of Technicai Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). Eduoatlon, 3) PrincipaS, Kirodimal Government Polytechnic Coiiege, Rajgarh (CG). 4) Dr. F.lvl. Quareshs, (v^rongly mentloned In Annexure P/1) as SM. Qureshi) Leoturer (Ejectrical Englneering), Gov!:, Polytechnic Coiiege, Durg (CG). 5) Shri G.R. Sahu, Lecturer (Civli Engineering) Kirodlmai Govt, Poi^echnjc Coiiege, Raigarn (Writ Petition Articie under Artsole 226 ofthe Constitution of india) S3: Hon'bie Mr. SaSsh K. Agnihotri, J. Presenfc Shri Gautam Bh^duri, oounsel for the petitioners,. Shri AlokBakshl, Govt. Advocate ferthe State. ORAL (Passed on 6 February, 2008) Learned counsei appearing for the petitloners submits that he do@s not v^ant to press this petitlon on merit. However, the respondents be directed to conslder the representations dated 19-6-2007 (Annexures P/10 & P/11) fiied bythe petitloners pending before the authorities. 2) Shri Aiok Bakshl, Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that there is no reason not to deoide the representations fiied by the petitioners, In acoordance with law. Raju -1-- 3) Accordlngly, the respondents/authorities are directed to conslder the representations as stated (supra) flied by the petitioners, In accordance with iaw and on its own merit, at an eariy date as expeditiously aa posslbte. 4) in view of the above, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge K