IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36600 of 2008 Rajaram Chaudhary, Son of Shri Raghunath Chaudhary,resident Village- Ramgarhwa, Mahuawa P.S. Pipra Kothi, District-East Champaran ( Motihari) ---------------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 29-04-2009 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of peremptory order dated 18.7.2008, he had complied the order within the time by filing requisites on 23.8.2007,but by inadvertence notices through ordinary post has been filed , although order was for taking steps by both processes. When the dismissal of the case was brought to his notice through Memo issued by the Office, he filed requisites etc by registered cover on 18.8.2008, which was far beyond the stipulated time granted by peremptory order. The submission on behalf of the petitioner is that it was absolutely due to mistake on the part of his clerk. Such casual approach to the litigation in the High Court is not expected and the learned counsels and their clerks should be conscious about the peremptory orders passed by the Courts. Be that as it may since the requisites by registered cover has already been filed though beyond the period granted by peremptory order, the original application will stand restored to its original file in respect of Opp.Party no.2 subject to the condition that a sum of Rs.25/- is paid in the coffers of the Advocate Association, Patna High Court, Patna within a period of one week and the receipt thereof is filed in the office within - 2 - same time. The application is allowed subject to the condition as stated above. NKS/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)