Singha %&mch xv @ £ gw IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR , W.P. NOSSZ [2005 ‘PETITIONER / Vijay Transport Ambikapur Through Proprietor, Ramakant M44 u K‘ W Prasad Gupta,/xS/o‘. Jeetan Prasad Gupta, R/o. Old .bus Stand, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (C.G.) VERSUS 1 RESPONDENTS /. State Transport Appellate ' Tribunal, Raipur (C.G.), Regional Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.). M/ s. Prince Babra Transport, ‘Ambikapu-r, Proprietor M/ s. Babra, ’ R/o. Devriganj Road, Ambikapur. / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w I XI—HC—22 mm 1-3:g005 x Shri B.K. Rawat, oounsel forth Shri Sumesh 'Bajaj, Deput respondent No.2. The petitioner has preferred {hrs amus be issued to 'the Sia‘te Trnsport Appenate Tribunai, Raipur m the revision filed before it unde section 90 of‘the Motor Vehicies Act, titioner. overnment Advocate for the State) t petition seeking reiief that a writ o i f ting regular permit on the route of A bikapur to Rnghunathnagar. not been'formulated by the Smte G. rnment fixing the number of stage carages on the route in question ad on other grounds. ’Howeverrthe ‘ionai Transport Authority vide its rder dated $1-W, ‘inspite of the / the STAT, in the month of August, and’appiied for grantof say-against the order of the RTA’ Even'after the ipse of five months period. the learned Triunal has neither decided the eta application nor, the revision petition. efore, the STAT be directed to de e the revision petidon, at the earliest, enoy before the STAT, Raipur, a u even then, the revision petition is not \5 r e s y . d -o e H , r d XI-HC—22 mw,m,m Wm 1H 200 m C)? 3Q a § fact about the pondency of cases before the i have ascerlained‘ STAT, ‘Raipur, from the Reg ,of this Court and i have been informed that the submission made by leamed unsel for the petitioner is not without faundatian. When there is no much pend ncy befofe the STAT, then the learned Tribunal ‘ ought to have decided the expeditiously, in acaci'dance with law. in the circumstances, t e learned STAT; Raipur is directed to decide the fevision petition, as early as po ‘bie, in accordance with lawJ With the above/observ tions and direetion, the petition stands disposed f of. Consequently, IA.No.1 73/2005 stands'dispo \ W i J s ' aw Wan mm WR§E mmmw WW§WW éamm ’ r‘