GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2005 Kailash Lakha Shinde ...Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Nitin Pradhan wioth S.D.Khot for the petitioner. Mrs. P.H.Kantharia APP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 16TH JUNE, 2005 16TH JUNE, 2005 16TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the framing of charge by the learned trial Judge. The contention being that the framing of the charge is with utter disregard to the provisions of section 227 Cr.P.C. Section 227 provides for discharge and it specifically requires the learned trial Judge to charge or discharge the accused named, after hearing the submissions of the accused and the prosecution in that behalf. The allegation is no such hearing as contemplated by section 227 was ever granted. In this view of the matter the charge as framed is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the learned trial court drawing its attention to the specific provision of section 227 of Cr.P.C. and to proceed with the matter as required by law. The petition is accordingly disposed of. ....