IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17158 of 2010 THAKUR DAYAL SINGH S/O SHIV NARAYAN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- BELAHARI, P.O.BELHARI, P.S.SIKROL LAKE, DISTRICT- BUXAR………………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THRU THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI. 2. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE SECRETARY, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BUXAR. 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NAWANAGAR BLOCK DISTRICT- BUXAR 8. THE MUKHIYA, BELAHARI GRAM PANCHAYAT UNDER THE NAWANAGAR BLOCK, DISTRICT-BUXAR…………...RESPONDENTS. ----------- For petitioner:- Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For State:- SC-24 For Union of India:- Ms.Kalpana, CGC ----------- 2/ 08-Oct-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. From Annexures 1 and 2 it has been shown that the petitioner has grievance against, virtually, all the schemes and against all the officials in the district administration. His further grievance is that in spite of direction from Prime Minister’s office to the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, no action has been taken by any authority to inquire into the 2 petitioner’s grievance. The allegations appear to be quite general and vague. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. 3. If the petitioner has any particulars available with him, he will be at liberty to file a fresh representation before the authorities including District Magistrate, Buxar which may be considered on its own merits. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)