IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14723 of 2011 1. Smt. Shanti Devi W/O Harendra Singh R/O Vill.- Baldih, P.S.- Daraunda, Distt.- Siwan 2. Laxman Prasad S/O Late Jagannath Prasad R/O Vill.- Pasiwarh, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, Distt.- Siwan 3. Ram Naresh Prasad S/O Late Sundar Prasad R/O Vill.- Pandey Narayan, P.S.- Daraunda, Distt.-Siwan 4. Shivji Sharma S/O Late Baldeo Sharma R/O Vill.- Pandeypur, P.S.- Daraunda, Distt.- Siwan 5. Dhanesh Ram S/O Bairagi Ram R/O Vill.- Maraswa, P.S.- Daraunda, Distt.- Siwan 6. Awadh Tiwari S/O Late Deopujan Tiwari R/O Vill.-Marosara, P.S.- Daraunda, Distt.- Siwan 7. Brij Bihari Mishra S/O Late Jwala Mishra R/O Vill.- Pakari, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, Distt.-Siwan Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Siwan 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan 4. The Block Development Officer, Daraunda, Siwan 5. The Officer-incharge, Daraunda police station, District-Siwan. ---------------------------------- 2/ 13.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make the officer-incharge, Duraunda police station as respondent no.5. All the petitioners are P.D.S. dealers within Duraunda Block in the district of Siwan. The petitioners pray for quashing the common memo no.1551 III dated 03.08.2011 issued under the signature of Block Development Officer, Duraunda, whereby they have been directed to refund the amount mentioned therein, as the value of undistributed rice. The petitioners submit that they have returned the entire undistributed rice. 2 Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioners needs verification. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. The respondent would examine the quantity of rice allotted and the quantity that have been supplied by the petitioners to the agencies as well as the quantity that will still remain with the petitioners. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)