.;) v c C.j. & J. Dllo Bal, wldow of Balkrishna Sahu, about 45 years, resident of Tiuor Tehsif Kharsiya, District Rajgarh (CG). Versus 1. Ghashi Ram, S/o Timuram Koshta, about 57 years, 2. Bhakal Gond, S/o Konda, 54 years, 3. Dhanuwa, S/o Buldu ^nwat, about 54 yesrs, Alt are resident of villaae Tluor Tehsi! Khasrhiya, Distrlct Raigarh (CG). OF N05S1/1892 : Shri Sunii Sahu, iearned counsei for the petitioner. (1Tth The foiiowing order of the Court was by C.J. Leamed-counsel for the petitloner Is heard on !VI.(C)P. No.830/2004, a petition for condonation of deiay in fliing the restoration petstion. 2) On due consideration.. we are that the petltloner has succeeded in showlng sufficlent cause for the In fillng the restoration petitlon. 3) M.(C) P. No.830/2004, therefore, Is and the o? four In fiiing the petltlon is hereby condoned. :ii^:sssss 1 ? 4) Shri Sunli Sahu, iearned counsei for the petitioner is heard on the restoratlon petition. 5) The petitJoner Is seeking restoration of Second Appea! No.561/1992, whlch was fbr Vi/ant of prosecution vlde 6) On due consideratlon of the submissions of iearned counsei for the petitioner and the grounds in the restoration petition, we are that the absence of the petJtioner's/aDpeiiant's cn 05.03.2004 was on bona fide grounds. 7) MCC No.63/2004, therefore, is alEovved and Second Appeal No.561/1992 Is restored to its origlnai number. T nimmi Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge .J