IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1833 of 2009 KAMRULLAH @ KAMRULLAH HAJAN @ KAMRULLAH SALMANI …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAJILA KHATOO …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2. 27.09.2010 Heard. Petitioner is the husband. He assails the order dated 28.10.2009, whereby on a consideration of the case made out by the applicant-wife and the rejoinder filed by the husband- petitioner, ad-interim maintenance in the sum of Rs.1500/- has been fixed payable to the applicant-wife. The matter was thereafter fixed for evidence. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in his rejoinder outrightly denied the alleged marriage with the applicant(o.p.no.2) . This Court perused the pleadings made in paragraphs 6 and 9 of the application. Learned trial court has taken a view that a lady cannot dare to approach the court declaring herself as wife of a person and thereby claiming maintenance. This Court declines to interfere with the order impugned, whereby only ad-interim maintenance has been fixed and directed to be paid to o.p.no.2. All issues are yet to be raised and considered by learned Family Court where the evidence shall be laid by the parties in support of their respective cases. Let the petitioner raise all these facts/grievances 2 before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaimur and adduced supporting evidence which shall be considered by learned court below in accordance with law while disposing of the application finally. With the aforesaid observations, the matter stands disposed of. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )