IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-18259 of 2009 Date of decision: 04.03.2011 Chaman Lal alias Sanju and others ....Petitioners Versus Saroj Bala and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - None for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) None was present on behalf of the petitioners on 28.6.2010, 2.8.2010, 15.12.2010 and even today none is present to press the present petition seeking anticipatory bail in a complaint case. Record reveals that interim bail was granted to the petitioners vide order dated 10.7.2009. Record further reveals that petitioners were summoned on a private complaint to face trial for the offence punishable under Section 3 SC/ST Act. Anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act should ordinarily be not granted in view of Section 89 of the Act, therefore, petition is dismissed. Interim bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 10.7.2009 is hereby cancelled. (Alok Singh) Judge March 04, 2011 R.S.