IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2007 / 13TH PAUSHA 1928 WA.No. 2410 of 2006(A) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25257/2006 Dated 26/10/2006 .................... APPELLANT: 2ND RESPONDENT ------------------------- SAM THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS KOSHY, KENKEYIL HOUSE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.HARIHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 3: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A.J.THOMAS, AMBATU RUBBER STORES, THEVANCODE, KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR TAXES SRI. V.V. ASOKAN. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & M.N. KRISHNAN, JJ. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO. 2410 OF 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. Writ petition has been filed by the 2nd respondent herein seeking to quash Ext.P14 letter and for other consequential reliefs, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. 2nd respondent is not aggrieved by that judgment and has not filed any appeal. We, therefore, fail to see how the 2nd respondent in the writ petition can prefer this appeal. Appeal is therefore, dismissed as not maintainable. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-