IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8072 of 2011 VIKRAM MANDAL @ BITTU @ VIKRAM KR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.05.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to incorporate the criminal antecedent in the petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.09.2010 in a case registered under Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act, Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act and 11 of the U.P.A. Act. From possession of the petitioner one country made pistol and cartridges were recovered. Though from the house of the petitioner two live bombs were also recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though in the petition it has wrongly been stated that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent but the petitioner is involved in two other cases but no case is registered under Section 27 of the Arms Act and under the 2 Explosive Substances Act. These cases have been lodged at the behest of agnates of petitioner. The petitioner is not the member of any Naxal organizations and as the petitioner brother’s is in army whose dress was also recovered hence, it is justified that recovery of Khaki uniform made from the house of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J. F.T.C., III Munger, in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 130 of 2010. Learned Court below will positively cancel the bail of the petitioner if he gets involved in similar nature of offence. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)