PEFITIONEa BEpeas TSS soy'BLS siaa QQUST QF eBSwnseAas W s BIl.ASPffS. fri t Pettt ien Ss. '2S^—1ef 2Q02. Smt. &am Ssi wtfe of Shri Shyam Saa Soswawi, aged 36 years, resident of Sharada Pa.rs, Og.mp So.2, Shilai, Tahsil & Distria-t Durg (O.S.) vsasus SESPOtiOSWrS^ s^. 1. MoniJ Kuma.r alia.s Mamsh Kunar S/o. ffday Singh Sa.rhpayale (So.ha.r), aged 25 yeafs, resident of ialfholi Saha, Va.rS, So.20, Sajn.g.ndgaon, Fahsil and Sistrtct Sajnandgaon (C.S.) ^** ^^^w. ^y"' fc^? ^ y •\. V, ":.- 9 2. Smt. Santi Meshra.m V/o. ifayma.n. aged 54 years, resident of Shareda Para, CaMp tfo»2, Shilai, Tahsil & Dtstrict Darg (C.S.) j J. Managing DireGtor, Bhilai SteelPlant, Ispg.t Bha.ua.n, Bhilai, Distr-iot Durg, (C.G.) Pin-490009. vair pEriTiow ffSDsa ASTICLE 226/227 OF TBE QONSTITlfTIOtf OP ISDI& POS ISSU AifCB OF SSIT w._MASDWis/csa'rioaAai oa ASV OTaea APPBOPSIATS (I ^@ >, ..LEi^ mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR &B: Hon'ble Shri Prasfcant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition No. 2823/2002 PETITIQNER : Smt. Ram Bai RESPONDENTS : Versus Manij Kinnar aBas Mamsh Kumar and odiers Appearance: Shri C.R. Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri B.P. Gupta, counsel for respondentNo.l. Shri Shrijith C.S. Nair, counsel for respondent No.2. None for respoadent No.3. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORALORDER (07.09.2010) The Civil Judge Class-I, Rajnandgaon decided the application prefen-ed by Manij Kumar alias Manish Kumar/respondent No.l under section 372 ofthe Indian Succession Act, 1925 vide its order dated 1/05/2002. Against the said order, the petitioner preferred an appeal under section 384 ofthe Act, 1925. This appeal was dismissed by the First Additional District Judge, Rajnandgaon in Civil Appeal No. 13-A/2002 vide its order dated 30B1 September, 2002. (2) The appellate order is amenable to the revisional jurisdiction of this court under section 384 (3) ofthe Act, 1925 read with section 115 of CPC. The instant petition is thus not maintainable as the petitioner has an altemative statutory remedy ofpreferring a revision before this court. :^ '~\ (3) Counsel for the petitioner seeks pemiission of the court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a properiy eonstituted civil revision under section 384 (3) read with section 115 ofCPC. (4) The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (5) Certified copy of the impugned order shall be returaed to counsel for the petitioner on supplying the xerox copy. (6) M.W.P. No.1832/2002 is also disposed of. _^-—-— —n2rMtewa; 'r"