WP(C) 1497/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Challenge made in this writ petition is an order of settlement passed by the Ba rpeta Zilla Parishad settling Rupakuchi Par ghat in favour of the respondent No. 8 for the period from 1.7.08 to 30.6.09. It is stated by the petitioner that he is the highest bidder and ignoring the sa me the Par ghat was settled in the name of the respondent No.8. Hardly there is less than two months to conclude the period of settlement. It appears that in W P ( C) No. 4247/08 the settlement made in favour of the respondent No.8 was set aside in a writ filed by one Nurul Haque by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 18.12.08 which was set aside in WA No. 7/09 vide judgment and order dated 25.03.09. Consequently, respondent No.8 is now running the Par ghat. At this s tage, after the aforesaid round of litigation, the petitioner has field this wr it petition challenging the said impugned order. No justifiable ground has been pleaded as to the cause of unjustified delay in approaching the court to challen ge the settlement of the Par ghat in question which would expire by 30.6.09. In that view of the matter, I do not consider it to be a fit case to exercise my jurisdiction to issue writ or direction as prayed for in this case. Consequently, this writ petition stands rejected.