IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 1521 of 2003 Between: 1.Sri Mayana Yehsanulla Khan S/o Yousuf Khan, R/o Chouk Veedhi, Chinnamandem Post and Mandal, Kadapa District. 2.Smt. Mayana Bee Khatun BI W/o Mohiuddin Khan, R/o Chouk Veedhi, Chinnamandem Post and Mandal, Kadapa District. 3.Smt. Patan Jamalkhatu Khan Late Khasim Khan, R/o Chouk Veedhi, Chinnamandem Post and Mandal, Kadapa District. 4.Sri Mayana Ahamadulla Khan S/o Late Basheer Khan, R/o Makan Street, Chinnamandem, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. 5.Sri Mayana Fayazulla Khan S/o Safdar Khan, R/o Santa Bazaar, Chinnamandem, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. 6.Sri Mayana Modin Khan, S/o Safdar Khan, R/o Santa Bazaar, Chinnamandem, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. 7.Sri Mayana Ayaz Ali Khan, S/o Mahboob Khan, R/o Arab Street, Chinnamandem, Rayachoty, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Kadapa District. Kadapa District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chinnamandem Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent vide Ref.E4/4512/2002 dt.8.1.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to forebear from interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of their respective house sites assigned to them and situated in Chinnamandyam Village and Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Writ Petition No.1521 of 2003 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms/.Indus Law Firm, has filed a letter, dated 23.01.2009, and the learned counsel, Sri R.Vivekananda, has also represented in the Court that the petitioners do not wish to pursue the writ petition. In view of the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The interim order, dated 27.01.2003, shall stand dissolved. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt.03.02.2009 VGB