1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1066 OF 2010 Pralhad Vithoba Kamble .. Petitioner. Vs. The Addl.Commissioner of Police and Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Chandrashekhar i/b Mrs.Kalyani G.Parmar for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.Yagnik APP for the State. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 22ND JUNE, 2010. P.C. Heard Mr.Chandrashekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Yagnik, learned APP appears for the respondents. As per the petitioner vide agreement dated 28.1.1998 he has purchased Flat No.201, Wing “3”, Rajnigandha Building No.A/2, Mulund Sahakar Vishwa Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., Nahur Village Road, Mulund (W), Mumbai from the original owner Mr.Deepak Ankush Pagare for a total consideration of Rs.1,20,000/-. He further states that the said flat was transferred in his name on 3.5.2006 on payment of transfer fee. On 7.4.2007, the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies has appointed Mr.Kadam, Mr.Badri and Mr.Bande as the Board of Administrators. The said board was replaced by Shri Dilip Tambe and Shri Tukaram Jagtap on 30.6.2007 and as per the petitioner the new members indulged in various malpractices and corruption with respect to the construction and allotment of the flats. In such circumstances, the S 2 subject flat was handed over to someone else and not the petitioner. Admittedly, the petitioner has already approached the Co-operative Court with a dispute under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and unless that is decided, the petitioner’s grievance that the documents were fabricated or forged or the signatures were forged cannot be gone into and as of now the dispute raised or grievance raised by the petitioner appears to be of a civil nature. Hence the petition is rejected. (ANOOP.V.MOHTA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)