1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.536 OF 2010 Mr.Mahesh Krishnakant Ghadi )..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra )..Respondent Vs. Smt.Vaibhavi Mahesh Ghadi )..Org.Complainant ---- Mr. Rohit Tiwari for the applicant. Smt. V. R.Bhosale APP for the State. Mr.V. V. Salunkhe for the original complainant. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 7th May, 2010 PC 1 Heard Advocate for the applicant and Advocate for the complainant. Both the Advocates state that they have settled the matter out of court and file consent terms. The consent terms contemplate divorce by mutual consent. The same are taken on the file and marked “X” for the sake of record. Taking into account the document, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail. It is therefore directed that pending his trial in pursuance of C.R.No.176 of 2009 registered by the Seawoods police station, Navi Mumbai, the applicant may be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the condition that he reports to the Investigating officer as and when called upon by him to do so in writing and remains present on all dates of his trial unless exempted. In so far as other reliefs mentioned in the consent terms, parties may move for the same in the appropriate Court. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 2 3