THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTZSS2®HAT BIIASPUR SMT. FATEMA BEGUH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, WIOOW OF LATE MOHD. IBPAHIM HAJI. SHAKOOR, LALPUR, ROAD, t^RD ETO.7, BAGBAHARA, TAHSIL AND DISTT.- MAHASAMUND, CHHATTISGARH. W,P.NO. ^V'7^ OF 2002_ -^s?^ ^•"•::^%<-;^" T.^-^W'I>^' 1 ^TH^in ^ ^\ e-—-11 y"^- .// m STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH: PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,D.K.S. BHAWAN, MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DBPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, MANTRAIjAYS^D.K.S. BHAW^N, RAIPOR, CHHATTISGARH. THE CQLLECTOR, DISTRICT-MAHASAMUND (C.G. THE DEPUTY COLLEQTOR, DISTRICT-MAHASAMUNE (C.&.) THE S.D.0. (REVENUE), DISTRICT - MAHASAMUND (C.G.). THE SUPERrNTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT MAHASAMUND (C.G.). . THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION BAGBAHARA, DISTRICT - MAHASAMDHD—U'-c—l- fi^. 'MatB ^aad .Sara&yali, »- Sw®%>ec« age& about. 30 years, '• .a» Bagh&ghara, (C.G,). l.S.. Bhagafe, $,B«6..p., XAsfcriet Msbassmuiid (G«o*?. •I 1 -Ac WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2287227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ORDERS IN NATURE OF WRITS. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTT PETmON No. 474 of2002 : Smt. Fatema Beeum. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : StateofCUhattisgarh& Others. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF 'IBDE CONS'ITTUTIQNOFB'ff}IA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri Firoz Khan, Advocate tbrthe petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy G.A. forthe State/respondent No. 1 to 7. Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No. 11 aiid 12. Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate appears as amicus curiae. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 19a' day of July, 2010) 1. Shri Bhatia, ieamed Deputy Govemment Advocate appearing for fhe State/respondent No. 1 to 7 submits that the final report in respect of the alleged mcident has been filed before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mahasamund, (for short, 'JMFC, Mahasamund') wherein the matter is pending consideration (Annexure R/7). Thus, tlie petitioner, ifstill has any grievance, may very well appear before fhe JMFC, Mahasamund and put fonvard her case, ifrequired. 2. In view offhe faet that the repoil has already been submitted to tlie JMFC, Mahasamund, it is not necessar^' to grant any relief as sought for in this petition as the matter is pending eonsideration before tlie JMFC, Mahasamund, wherein fhe petitioner may appear and assist fhe court properly. 3. Shri Dangi, leamed counsel appearing as amiciis curiae submits that m view ofthe subsequent development, nothing remains for adjudication by this Court, othei-w'ise any observations made by this Court may have adverse irufluence on the Judicial QfBcer, who is dealing witli the matter. 4. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that obsen'ations, if any, made hereinabove, the saine shall not come in way ofproper adjudication/trial ofthe matter pending before the JMFC, Mahasamund. Interhn reliefgranted earlier is vacated. sat^K:.Tihot" Amit *"" judge_