IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 13251 of 1989 Date of Decision: April 29, 2009 Amarjit Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR Present: Mr. Amit Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of direction to the Departmental Selection Committee for J.B.T. Teacher-respondent No. 3 for consideration and selection of the petitioner for the post of J.B.T. teacher. Further prayer for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has also been made to call her for interview and consider her alongwith other candidates. C.W.P. No. 13251 of 1989 2. In the written statement filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3, a preliminary objection has been taken that despite the fact that the petitioner was not eligible to be considered for appointment being overage, she was considered for appointment as J.B.T teacher by the Departmental Promotion Committee, Ludhiana, complying with the interim order passed by this Court on 19.10.1989 in the instant petition but she could not be selected and a letter dated 23.5.1990 of the Departmental Selection Committee had been placed on record (R-1). 3. Once the aforesaid factual position is appearing in the instant case then the claim made by the petitioner has to be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (M.M. KUMAR) April 29, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor 2