IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5323 of 2008 Decided on: 13.09.2010 Barfi Ram Sharma and others. …Petitioners Versus Union of India and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. None for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that since the pay scale has already been released to the petitioner w.e.f. 1992, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. In view of this, the present petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 13, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?