HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 327 of 2007 (M/S) Padam Singh …. Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttaranchal/Uttarakhand through Secretary, Home Affairs & others … Respondents Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 8th June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Statement has been made at the bar by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has now become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. On the basis of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 8.6.2009 Avneet