-^^ RF'li'''*- E IJU.iuV THE m^H COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WMT PETLUON N0. 1.52.J /2006 Narayaa Prasad Yadav, .".^/ S/o- Late Duberam Yadav, ^ /. Aged about 35 years, .••'^- .-• R/o-Village— Purgaou, 3)^^/ P.S. - Bilaigarh, - ^^y Distt. Raipur. >jyV"'' Chhattisgarh. VERSUS PETITIONER ^ ^ .'.^ .\ .: :"*u ,, -\^ I ^> 3 SfAW.RRA'^ iti'SiAiva^. 1""!' ^-^' 1. State ofChattisgarh, Througfa-Secretary, Deptt. OfGeneral Administration, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Secretary, Deptt. ofEducation, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, CG. 3. Distt. Education Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, C.G. ^v.-aufWySta^ ^^% RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, J^ERIIQRARTETC^ F XI-HC-22 's^! 'UiWW^, »ti1'M'ie, fa'ni^y 311^1 ^T feiwsn^i st^Rf^ ^i^t 3TI^t ?^ITWHf?tI ^)1^!^<fH TlR^Tf '4 'fe'^ Tf^l-^K ^? sri^rir 3ii^i < Y 21^-2006 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, cjounsel for Uie petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy Govt. Advocate for the State of Chhattisgarh. The case is listed for ortters on default of non-filing of legible copies. The.defauit is condoned. pffice is directed to register thecase. Heard. Lsarned counsel for the on 4-2-2000 and thereafter th4 appointment which was deniedj petitioner submits that ttie petitioner's father.who was workfng as P^on in the ofRce of Btock Development Education Officer, BIIaigarh, Di^trict Raipur, died during service period petitioner appiied for compassionate it is further submitted that in bateh o( cases bearing W.P. No.1322/2002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Cour| on 20-12-2005. He prays ttiat simitar orders may be passed in this ca^e also. Learned counsel for the and states that the State of consider the cases of dependa(its of those employees who died on or after 1-11-1997 stricBy in acco time. in the opinion of this Court, end consider and decide the case poiicy prevalent at the time State does not dispute the above fact Shhattisgam has taken a decision to dancewith the policy prevalent at that In view of the submissiohs made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressitfig any opinion on the merits of the case, ofjusticewillbe served if a direction is giveri to the State of Chhattisbarh and tteaythorities concerned to rf the petitioner in accordance w the of death of petltioner's father. If the [^tfg^ XI-HC-22 d^ ^qraRra, dfl1'hli(»,feiray l(W<-(T»Hrai ^........,..........................^.^ ^^ SII^T^iT R-fi* 3T!^T *t|i«b^ifCT. sn^r ?:Riim'gft'? -T ^f^f^l'T 'W^* ^ 'f^St' <RiR$T< ^T 3!f=tFI 31KW petBoner found eligible, appointm^nt possibie preferably within a peric|d receipt/production of copyofthis o^der. render due co-operation to the authbrities With the aforesaid observatifans, Certifled copyas perrulesafter Copy to ttie State counsel. ordere will be issuecl as eariy as of four mpnths from the date of r. The petitioner is a|so directed to , this petition stands disposed of. registering the case,_^ . Gowri Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['4^ ^(<3<i .^° ^