IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 23866 of 2007 Between: 1 AP Transco., rep.by its Superintending Engineer AP Transco, Vizianagaram 2 The Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation -II Bobbili, Vizianagaram District 3 The Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation Sub Division APEPDCL, Salur, Vizianagaram District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Sri lalitha Farms, Ramabhadrapuram, Ramabhadrapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, having its Head office at Konisi Street, Vizianagaram, Rep.by its Managing partner Sri B.P.Naidu .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari after calling for the records relating to and connected with the order dated 24.1.2007 in FA.No.1121 of 2005 of the AP State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad that was passed in CD.No.11/2003 of the District Consumer Forum, Vizianagaram and quash the same by declaring it as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and Rules made thereunder and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.JAGANNATHA RAO THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.23866 of 2007 ORDER:(per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 24.101.2007 in F.A.No.1121/2005 in C.D.No.11/2003 of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission, Hyderabad. On 19.01.2009, this Court had directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to verify whether the order of the primary authority, which was upheld by the A.P. State Consumer Disputes a n d Redressal Commission, Hyderabad, by reducing the compensation from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.5,000/-, has been executed or not. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order has been executed. Hence, we are not inclined to go into the merits of the matter since both the primary as well as appellate authorities taking into account the oral and documentary evidence held that there is deficiency in supplying power to the respondent and the compensation of Rs.15,000/- awarded by the primary authority was reduced to Rs.5,000/- by the appellate authority. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J _____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J Dt:01.06.2009 usd