CTi 0 <rrsr IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.fS) N0.^^^3/2008 PETITIONER ^s^^ ...s^ ^^"° .^ ^- RESPONDENTS ^ ^r^ •1 T.C. Patel, S/o. Late Shri Motichand Patel, aged about 57 years, Assistant Director, Office of District ».«9 Education Office, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G-), R/o. Darogapara, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Under Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) t.^^- 3. District Education Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Shri R.R. Patel, Prindpal, Government Higher Secondary School Paonda, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^L... ,fe ^^•: ® ^ ^ Sl®Gfelo^Conffll^aiw ©fXi^ia. !^ughs ^^t^y, Myvachn' ^w. ^^isa ^^a^^o^^ llOOOl —-<^» XC^?^::rri..BffteBr' wtr-"^ Xh^i. a«t»i.y.»«i.^7J;^^^, ?j 37T^T ^T f^iN' TTS?T 3TT^T ^h^jch 'TST ^l^lc-l^, ^tli'y^Ko, [®l<yll'(-l^< *II*<CTI g,^ich""'"---- •"•••"••••• '••••••^200^ 3TF^7T Tf^r (TiGrf33^T) ^TTW^rit^ 3T?^T Writ Petifcion under Arti<|sle 226 of the Constitution of India SB; HON. SHRI DHIRENDfeA MISHRA, J 22-10-2008 Shri Raiiiakant Pand( Slm YS Thakur, Dy Aj Heard on IA No. 01 petltion. Not opposed. The application (IA permitted to implead tlie Chief Electoral Officer 4 aiiiendment accordingly ir| day. Shi'i AS Gahai~war,| respondents No. 5 & 6. Lean.ied counsel for is directed agatnsl his 23.9.2008 whereby U-ie Directore Education, <^I^F<n<II'1 'WT^Tf "^f f^St <pyi^K ^^RRW^T y,. counsel for the petitioner. for the State. ^ application for ainendnient in the No.02) is allowed. The petitioner is Slection Conimission of India and the LS respondents aiid carry out the the petition durmg the course of the comisel appem's on behalf of the tie titansfer petitioner subniits that this petition order of Amiexure P/1 dated p^titioner, who is working as Assistant Raig4rh, lias been transferred as Assi^ant^ /y./? ^ :':-^^^:^ ^ ^^'''•'^ N XI-MG—'78 ^TT^T -^i f<4i<^ TTSTT 3TR'?! sti^icfr) '*<<- ^ MW^t »*(|ch "3'^T T^I<Lllcn^, ^tlt<H^<o, [®l<ni^^< . Vf-P-C^ ) ^^^c? -^ 200^ 3TI^?T '^T^R' (1?t^<i^) ^Rnw^ftn 3Ty^?i z- Du'ector, Education, is not pressmg thls petitio du'ection to the respond Annexure P/5 dated 25.' Annexure P/l. Ram^nujganh. He further subniits that he i^i at this stage. However, he prays for ^nts to decide his representation of P.2008 against his transfer order of Leamed counsel fo]| representation of Amiexur^ within a period of three we^ks In view of above SL pai'ties, the instaiit petitio respondents No. 1 & 2 to (Annexiire,-P/5) oftfae petil period of three weeks, fr^ order, in accordance with } cl')l^(<vt^1l "RPW^Tf ^f 'fe^t I^T^K ^3?ifNa^r the respondent/State submits fhat P/5 ofthe petitioner shall be decided ibniissions of leanied counsel for the n is disposed of with a direction to fhe ponsider and decide Uie representa.tion ioner expeditiously, preferably within a )m the date of receipt of copy of this aw. . , [ Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge