IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.986 of 2007 MAHADEO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 7.11.2008 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. In the instant writ application the petitioner has prayed for commanding the respondents to institute an F.I.R. in view of the Gyapank No.765/66 dated 31.12.2006 against the respondent no.10, Munni Devi. He further prays that after instituting F.I.R. to arrest respondent no.10. The learned counsel for the State submits that he has received a copy of the petition in which prayer has been made for quashing the appointment of respondent no.13, namely, Ram Pravesh, whereas in fact there is no respondent no.13 in the main writ application. Further more no such prayer is made in the instant writ application also. After perusing the record of the case this Court is of the view that in case the petitioner has any grievance he may persuade his grievance against the aforesaid respondent. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of . Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)