CWP No.1378 of 2005 3.1.2006 Present: Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the view that no useful purpose will be served by issuing notice of this writ petition as it can be disposed of by directing respondent No.2, i.e., the Deputy Commissioner/ District Magistrate, Mandi, District Mandi, H.P. to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same within a time frame. Accordingly, we direct respondent No.2, the Deputy Commissioner/District Magistrate, Mandi to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this writ petition alongwith annexures and a certified copy of this order. In case respondent No.2 finds that Municipal Council, Sundernagar is to be heard in the matter, then notice in this regard will also be issued to it by respondent No.2. Writ petition stands disposed of in the terms indicated above. CMP No.2588 of 2005 No order in view of the disposal of the main matter. (V. K. Jhanji) Judge January 3, 2006 (Surjit Singh) (ss) Judge