IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-30934 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 20, 2009 Harkaran …. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another. ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Ms. Anita Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent No.2. S.D. Anand, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P/2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in the Court today and identified by their respective counsel. They further stated that they have no subsisting grievance against each other. Their joint statement is also recorded separately today. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petitioner shall stand allowed and FIR No.66 dated 16.03.2001, under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station, Nuh, District Mewat, shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 20, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge