THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Civil Revision Petition No.3719 of 2005 Order: The petitioners herein, who claim to be the landlords, filed this revision under Section 91 of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short ‘the Act’) inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 30.04.2005, passed by the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy, allowing the appeal at the instance of the respondents/protected tenants and remanding the matter for fresh disposal by the primary authority, namely, the Mandal Revenue Officer, Ibrahimpatnam. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondents filed an application under Section 32(1) of the Act seeking sanction of succession under Section 40 of the Act stating that their father was the protected tenant in respect of the subject lands. Initially, the primary authority did not accept the claim of the respondents placing reliance on the written statement filed by them in O.S.No.161 of 1974. But, the said finding was found fault with by the appellate authority by taking into consideration the basic aspect that civil proceedings have no relevancy in coming to the conclusions in respect of the tenancy matters, and set aside the order of the primary authority, dated 06.10.1993, and remitted the matter back for fresh disposal. Since the order under challenge is only a remand order and it is always open to both the parties to raise all such pleas and objections in support of their claims, which can amply be considered, I do not see any grounds warranting interference of this Court with the impugned order. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Date:19.08.2010 VGB