IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-5898 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 09, 2010 Tejinder Kaur & Another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Sapan Dhir, Advocate, for respondent No.4. None for respondent No.5. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for directions to respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to cause harm to the petitioners as they got married against the desires of private respondents. On 26.2.2010 when the matter was taken up, the parents of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 Crl. Misc. No. M-5898 of 2010 [2] appeared in Court and stated that the petitioners had been living in immediate neighbourhood and the families have been treating each other in brotherly fashion, and in such circumstances, the marriage could not have been performed. Be that as it may, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The dispute however has not been resolved. Learned counsel for the private respondent (No.4), on instructions from his client, states that the respondent would not take law into his own hands, however, might resort to social boycott. Be that as it may, considering the statement made on behalf of the private respondent that no illegal action would be taken against the petitioners, no cause of action survives. The petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) March 09, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?