's.v^f.?: ?" ^C^,.'?' ^-^' asatl.en IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILA.SPUR fCHHATriSGARH) WRIT PETITIONfSt N0.H^ /2007. WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE. PBariTLONER: ^ssy^es^ ^^•\§g^2?" V.R.ti6 9» <!("-• Ramnarayan Sahu, son of Radheshyam, aged about 46 years, Asst. Teacher, Priniary School Kaldamar, Korkona, Block Development and District Korba, Chhattisgarh. versus r5> Respondents ¥-- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, S^ \< (^ ^ Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,^11» G. %n.^' ^- 2. The Comniissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, Chhattisgarh. y 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, (C.G.) 4. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Raipur, (C.G.j. r,- WKH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 1103 of 2007 Petrt'ioner Ramneiroyan Sahu Versus Respondents : Slate of Chhattisgarfi and oltiers SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish |C. Ayiihotri. J Present: Mr. Om P. SAu, Advocute for Ihe petittoner. Mr. Ajay Dwwedi, Pkmel fcn»yerfor the respondents/State. V- OR&ER 0>assed on Ihis 26rt &oy of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner wns appointed vkle order dated 21.6.86 (Annexure P/l) as Aaistant Teaeher on fixed poy scate of Rs. 300/-. After completion of one year probation, he was grwited reyilnr pay. 2. Leamed counsel appecu'ing for the petitfoner ajbmits that •the issue invotved in -tfie ease is asto whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scafe w.e.f. •the date of h'lrtial appointment or frmn the date of completion of probation period. 3. The isaie inwlved. herein was considered by Ihe Mnchya Prodesh Stnte Administrative Tribunal, Jabatpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 o-riiers Vs. State of M.P. & oltwrs), wherein it was held •that the simifau-ty srhiated -teachers cre entitled to reyitar pay scale w.e.f. 1he date of initiat appomtment. The mutter was taken up to -the Hon'bte Supreme Coart «\Special LawePetition (Civif) No. 6892/93. The said petition vws dismissed by the Hwi'bfe Supr-eme Court- upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect Iftat the Teachers/Asristcnt Teachers are entitfed to regulen' pay scate from date of initiof cppointment. 4. Learned counset appearing for the petitioner further submfts •riiat •this Court, w^iile considern^ •the aane i^ue m Sushil TiviwB-i & others Vs. State Sovt. of Chhattisgarfi & o'thers (WP. (S) No. 5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has gnmted regutar pay a»kWA.f. Ae date of initial appointment. 5. Learned counsel appeoiring for the parties jomtly submit •thut this case is squarely covered by the clecision of •this Court in Ihe case of Sushit Ti'wari & others Vs. 5tate 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A o-lhers (Supro). 6. In view of 1hat, •this petition is allowed in Ihe same terms.No order ostocosts. Bflblu Sd/- SatisbKAgnihotn Judge