IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 1260 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SMT. USHA JOSEPH, AGED 38 YEARS W/O.JOSEPH K.G., KANKATTHARAYIL SHIJO VILLA VENMONY THAZHAM MURI, VENMONY VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR. 2. SMT.ALIYAMMA JOHNY, PALLATHUPARAMBIL, VENMONY THAZHAM MURI, VENMONY VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR 2. THE TAHSILDAR ,CHENGANNUR. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VENMONY. 4. SMT. SUJA JAMES, D/O.KURUVILA, KIZHAKKEMODIYIL, VENMONY THAZHATHU MURIYIL, VENMONY VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR. 5. SMT. SREEKUMARI, W/O.RAMACHANDRA KURUP UDAYAM BHAVAN, VENMONY THAZHATHU MURIYIL, VENMONY VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR. 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR, VENMONY POLICE STATION. CHENGANNUR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: W.P.C. NO. 1260/2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED. EXT.P2 REPRESENTATION DT. 7-7-2009. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF REPORT. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 1260 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 25th day of May, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of respondents 4 and 5 in obstructing a public water channel, which is used by the petitioners also. The petitioners also rely on Ext. P3 report of the Village Officer, which, according to the petitioner, would go to prove that all the allegations raised by them are correct. Detailing their grievance in this regard, the petitioners have submitted Ext. P2 petition before the 1st respondent and the petitioners seek a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P2 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. Despite service of notice, respondents 4 and 5 have not cared to appear the contest the matter. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 4 and 5. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/