HIGH cOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT a1LASPuR w. P. (s; No. 421s q 2007 Pramod Kumar Shrivas sic. Late Shri Ramratan Shrivas. Aged about — 38 years, By Caste —~ Shrivas (O.B.C.), Rlo.-Vii!a9e Sarkho Tahsii & Distt. Janjgir£hampa (0.6.) Versus 1. Chairman. Coal India Limited, 10, Nemji $ubhash Road, Kolkata ‘ (W.B.) 2. Director (P. & !R.), Coal lndia Ltd., 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkota (W.B.) Member Secte’tary, JBCC-V! Joint Bipanite Committee for The Coal industry), Goa! lndia Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkota (W.B.) 2. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, 8.E.C.L. Head Qtr. seepat Road, BHasput (C.G.) 3. Chief General Manager, Ralgarh Area. Distt.-Ralgarh, (C.G.) Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDlA (SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. ' Shri Praveen Das. Advocate for the respondents. O'R D E R (Passed on this 20‘“ day of July, 200?) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submia that the petitioner is similarly situated to that of the respondents in the matter of Chairman. Central Coalfields Ltd. & others Vs. Jivendra Prasad Tiwan' ' & others (Civil Appeal No. 1714 of 2007). Learned counsei further submits that the said Civil Appeal has been disposed of vide order dated 29‘“ March, 2007, passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia. Learned counsel further submits that this case may also be disposed of in the same terms, which the learned counsel appearing for the respondentsfS.E.C.L. does not controvert. 2. ln View of the above, the petition stands disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. l Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t l l l Bf-