1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2657 OF 2008 1. Prestige Garments and Tailoring Firm ) A proprietory concern of ) Shri Satish Ghadale, age 52 years, ) Occ : Business, having office at 583, ) Raivar Peth, Pune 411 002. ) 2. Shree Mahalaxmi Dresses & Tailoring ) Firm, a Proprietor concern of ) Tushar Ghadale, age 32 years, ) Occ: Business, having office at 389, ) Sahakar Nagar, Pune – 411 009. ) 3. Parekh Paper Co., ) through Proprietor Vijay Kumar ) Manikchand Parekh, age 54 years, ) having office at 397, Narayan Peth, ) Pune 411 030. ) 4. Kalyani Corporation, through its ) Proprietor Gautam Geleda, ) age 48 years, Occ: Business, ) having office at 1464, Sadashiv Peth,) Near Renuka Swroop School, ) Pune – 411 030. ) 5. Sumangal Mahila Swyam Rojgar ) Seva Sahakari Sanstha, ) a Co-operative Society, ) registered under Co-operative ) Societies Act, 1960, through its ) Chairman, Smt. Mangala Madhav ) Ransing, having her office at B-1/20, ) Bhosale Paradise, Range Hill, ) 2 Pune 411 007. ) 6. Samath Co-operative Consumer ) Central Stores Ltd., a Co-operative ) Society, registered under ) Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, ) having office at Sahakar Mandir, ) Veer Savarkar Road, Thane–401 601.) .. Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Maharashtra, ) through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, ) Mumbai – 400 032. ) 2. The Secretary, ) Department of Women and Child ) Development, Mantralaya, ) Mumbai – 400 032. ) 3. The Secretary, ) Department of Industries, ) Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400 032. ) 4. The Municipal Corporation of Greater) Mumbai, through its Commissioner, ) having office at Mahapalika Marg, ) Opposite C.S. T., Fort, ) Mumbai – 400 001. ) 5. The Commissioner, ) The Municipal Corporation of ) Greater Mumbai, having office at Mahapalika Marg, ) Opposite C.S. T., Fort, ) Mumbai – 400 001. ) 6. Chief Engineer C.P. A., ) 3 Central Purchase Authority ) Department, ) The Municipal Corporation of ) Greater Mumbai, 566, ) N.M. Joshi Marg, Byculla, ) Mumbai – 400 011. ).. Respondents -- Shri M.J. Jamdar for the Petitioners. Shri K.K. Singhvi along with Shri S.S. Pakale and Ms A.R. Joshi for the BMC. Shri J.S. Saluja, AGP for the State. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J JUDGMENT RESERVED ON : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2008 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 11TH DECEMBER, 2008 JUDGMENT : ( PER SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. ) Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, the Petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. For the reasons recorded in our Judgment in M/s. A.M. 4 Yusuf V/s. Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Others, Writ Petition (Lodging) No.2666 of 2008, pronounced today i.e. 11th December, 2008, this Petition is also dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. The Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J Sep.08/res.js/wp-l-2657.08.sxw