IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 481 of 2008(C) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.9268/2008 Dated 25/03/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC ----------------------------- V.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR, WRONGLY WRITTEN AS RAJASEKHARAN NAIR BUT SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED AS RAJENDRAN NAIR, AGED 46 YEARS, SON OF K.N.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, REVINDRA VILASAM, ANGADICKAL SOUTH, ANGADICKAL P.O., CHENGANNUR- 689 122. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WPC ------------------------------- 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, CHENGANNUR BRANCH, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA-689 121. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA-689 121. BY SC FOR SBI--SRI GEORGE THOMAS MEVADA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R.P.No.481/2008 in W.P.(C) No. 9268 of 2008-C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 28th day of May, 2008 O R D E R In this review petition, the petitioner complains that in the absence of any direction in the judgment, bank is declining to consider the petitioner's request for waiver and reduction of interest and penal interest. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the loan availed of by the petitioner being a housing loan, there is no scheme for the bank to waive or reduce interest or penal interest and it is not the judgment which stands in the way of the petitioner getting the benefit claimed. 3. In view of the facts as stated above, the request made by the petitioner there is no merit and no order, as sought for can be passed. 4. Though the petitioner sought for enlarging the time for paying the instalment due, since the Court has already shown indulgence on one occasion, I do not think that continued indulgence is to be shown in the matter. The review petition fails and it is, accordingly, dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge ms