( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 225 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4703 OF 2008 Santram s/o. Maruti Sanap .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Shri D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.V. Tele, A.G.P. for respondent State. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 03.08.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri D.R. Jaybhar for the petitioner. This Court in Writ Petition No. 4664 of 2008 decided on 11.08.2008 passed following directions in para 4:- “Considering the above position, the order dated 25th March, 2008, passed by the respondent No.3, thereby rejecting petitioner’s application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded back t the respondent No.3 with a direction to decide the said application only after the appeal preferred by the State is disposed of by this Court. Liberty to the ( 2 ) parties to move the Special Land Acquisition Officer after appeal is disposed of by this Court.” 2. It is argued by Adv. Shri Jaybhar that thereafter the application for condonation of delay in said First Appeal, bearing Civil Application No. 1238 of 2008 is dismissed by this Court on 19th November, 2008 and thereafter application Exh.R-4 dated 09.01.2009 was filed. In these circumstances, steps have been taken as directed in para 4. No further direction is given by this Court in the Writ Petition. In this view of the matter, it cannot be said that merely because application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act is not disposed of, there is any breach of order. Hence, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/JUN09/cp225.09