1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2983/2002 Sagram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: - 4.11.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. PP Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Chouhdary, for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners' contention is that they were qualified for the appointment on the post of Shiksha Sahayogi in the Rajiv Gandhi Golden Jubilee School and when the applications were invited, they submitted their applications and they were duly selected and have been assigned to the various Gram Panchayats referred in the order. The petitioners were sent for 30 days training which they have already completed and respondents were required to give appointments to the petitioners in the Gram Panchayats mentioned in the Annex.1. Then on 30th June, 2002 an order was issued by the Dy. Director (Junior), Elementary Education, Bikaner conveying that interim stay order has been granted by the High Court against the appointment to the para-teachers (like petitioners), therefore, no appointment be given. There is a reference of the DB Writ Petition No.1659/2002 (wrongly mentioned as DB Appeal No.1659/2002 in the order dated 30th March, 2002). The contention of the petitioners is that there was no blankate stay order against according appointment to the petitioners and that was made clear by the Division Bench of this Court in another writ petition no.1879/2002 vide order dated 1st June, 2006. Be it as it may be, according to the petitioners, even the DB Writ Petition No.1659/2002 has already been 2 dismissed by this Court as petitioner already withdrew that writ petition no.1879/2002, which is apparent from the order dated 30th May, 2002 placed on record by the petitioner. The record of D.B. Writ petition no.1879/2002 was also called. It is clear from the reply submitted by the State that the State admitted that the petitioners were selected for the post in the meeting dated 6th June, 2002 and they were sent for training, which they have already completed, but because of stay order passed by the Division Bench of this Court, the appointments were not given. In view of the subsequent event that the above referred to petitions have already been dismissed by this Court, therefore, there is no hurdle in giving appointment to the petitioners in accordance with rules. Therefore, the present writ petition is allowed with the direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the individual petitioner for according the appointment to them on the post for which they have been selected and were sent for training. The process be completed within a period of two months from today. [PRAKASH TATIA],J. cpgoyal/-