W C/f” \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.€$’r£ /2o1o (SBA PETITIONER Munu Dau Dewa11gan S/o Shri Shiv Prasad Dewang‘an, aged about 63' years, Occupation Retired Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School, Madanpara, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) Present R/o Village 85 Post Sakti, Akharabhatha Ward No. 10, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ‘Commissioner Tribal Welfare *Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.j Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, r. Madanpur, Kharsia, District- Raigarh (cc) Joint Director Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. wwwwm WW weaawo ggw/ W200 mm (Wu) WWW wmm mmw WW1§WW §73f§rqané¥t .3: HON’BLE JUST1CE MR. ?R 5 lTl 08-1 0-2010: Shri Manoj Jaiswai, counse for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, PL for th State. Grievance of the petition r in the present petition is that though he is entitled to get the b neflt of Ruie 22-D of Fundamental Ruies, on the basis of various circuiars (Annexures P/2 & P/3) issued by. the State Governme t, titl date same has not been granted. Contention of the couns l for the petitioner is that his representation (Annexure P/4) d ted 18.9.2010 is atre‘ady pending and ends of justice wouid be ser ed if at this stage, the petitioner is permitted to withdrawn the petitio with a direction to the respondent No.3 to decide the pending repre entation. State counsei has no obj ction if the representation of the dance with iaw. in View of the above, the p esent petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent o. 3 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner a expeditiously as possible. KER DIWAKER petitioner is decided strictly in ac it is made clear that this Co rt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authorty concerned would be at liberty to deoide the representation in accord ce With iaw W. Sdl- Pntmker Diwaker Judge r