TA No.156 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.156 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision. 05.08.2010 Neelam wife of Balaje daughter of Sh. Late Rajender Singh s/o Sh. Tara resident of village Sieay Pana Kaliram Nayia, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar. ......Appellant Versus Balaje son of Sh. Jagtu resident of village Kharkara, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak ......Respondent Present: Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) C.M. No.19465-CII of 2010 Application is allowed. Reply is taken on record. T.A. No.156 of 2010 1. The application is for transfer of the case pending at the Court at Rohtak to be transferred to the Court at Hisar on the ground that Rohtak is father away than from Hisar. The counsel for the petitioner states that she has to travel 100 kms., while for Hisar, she has to travel only 35 kms. The issue cannot be resolved for transfer only on the ground of what is convenient. It is stated by the TA No.156 of 2010 (O&M) -2- petitioner that the husband is threatening her. It is nobody's case that the husband has any special clout at Rohtak, which he does not have at Hisar. There is no good ground for a transfer. If she has any problem relating to expenses to be incurred, she will be at liberty to apply to the Court for maintenance which shall include the travel expenses for every date of hearing . When such an application is moved, the Court shall consider the same and pass appropriate order to fix a sum for her expenses incurred at every hearing date from her village to the place where the case is pending. 2. The application for transfer is dismissed with the liberty as aforesaid. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 05, 2010 Pankaj*