IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36462 of 2009 PINTU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 24.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 29.3.2009 in relation to Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 56 of 2009 which was registered under sections 376, 457, 380 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel is that it is a case of false implication. Petitioner was apprehended from his door step, brutally assaulted and the present case came to be lodged. The falsity of the case can be made out that the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR is that he committed rape in the last night on the daughter of Bakrudal Paswan but Bakrudal Paswan has not lodged any FIR. If the offence as alleged is true then it is said that the petitioner only tried to steal the box from the house of the informant in the mid of night and the other allegations are of street kind and, therefore, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. From the above kind of materials which have come during investigation coupled with the medical evidence, let the petitioner, namely, Pintu Singh be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara in connection with Ara Mufassil P.S. Case No. 56 of 2009. One of the sureties to be executed by the brother of the - 2 - petitioner, namely, Manish Kumar Singh and other by close blood relation of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. Petitioner will cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel and he will not intimidate the witnesses. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)