l U lQATURE gHHATI§§AR: §ILA (Division Bench) Hon’bie Shri S.R. NAYAK, CJ & Hon’hleShri Satish K.Agnihotri, J MISC, APPEALNOATG OF 2005 Mr. Goutam Khetrapai. learned counsel for the appeilants. ORAL ORDER Pased on 28m of’November 205) (e 6 The following Orer of the Court was assed by d p i S.R. Naak CJ: y This ppeal arises out o a personal Injury case hat waei contended beiore us by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the Tnbunal ouht to have awarded a sum of Rs 40,300! towards future l 11§H G¢RLQF iUD TH §PUR . \ a f W g Ahpeéuant Badku Ram Claimant Aged about 45 years, Slo Hagaru Charmkar. Rio Khparidih, P.S. Biiaigarh, / District Raipur (CG) VERSUS Respondent; (1) Teras Ram Aged about 4O years, S/o 'Duryodhan Sahu R/o Churela P.S. &.Tahsil: Bilaigarh, District Raipur (CG). ) (2) I Anand Ram S/o Ghasidas Sahu R/o Bhataaon, P.S. & Tahsii: Bilaigarh. District Raipur (CG). (3) The New india insurance Co Ltd. Branch Omce Hand Fioor RDA Building, Barren Bazar, Raipur (CG) Present: _. w x medrcal expenses but Instead It has awarded only a sum of Rs 20 000/ under the said head (2) ’ ‘ Havihg heard ‘Ieamed ccunsal fov the appeliant and having l perused the impugned award and other material papers appended to the ‘ appeal we cannot take any exception to what is'a'warde’d by the Tribunal under the hwd future expenses to be incurred towards medical treatment Though It was claimed by the claimant that he requires a sum of Rs 40 000]— and odd towards future medical expenses m support of that plea he has not produced any evidence The doctor who treated hlm Is also not examined In the absence of substantial legal ewdence the Tribunal has awarded a sum of R520 OOOI- towards future medical _ expenses and therefore we cannot condemn that part of the award as , u unreasonable or atbitrary No other pomt was urged before us to assail the l lmpugned award passed by the MACT The appeal rs devoid of merlt lt s accordingly dismlssed however with no costs \ I t