r" PetitiQJier Respondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BiLASPUR Writ Pelltson (Sl No. 714 of^08 A.R. Sahu, Son of Late Shri Bhojram Sahu, aged about 46 years, resident of P.N.T. coiony, Type tt/7, Bairan Bazar, Raipur, presentiy Sr. TOA (G), Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1) Union of tndia, througn Secretary, Department of Teiecommunication, New DeShi. 2) Chief General Manager, Tetecom, Chhattisgarh, Cjrcte, Bharat Sanohar Nigarm Limlted; A Govemment of india Enterprise, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3) Teiecom Distrlct Manager, Bastar, Jagdaipur, Chhattisgarh. (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon'bte IVIr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenfc Shri Manindra Shrivastava, Sr Advooate with Shri Amit Verma, counsel for the petltioner. Ms. Sharmiia Singhai, Asst Soiicitor General forthe reponndent No.1. Shri R.M. Soiapurkar, counse! for the respondents No. 2 and 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 8th February, 2008) Learned counsei appearing for the respondents submit that request Setter dated 18-8-2006 (Annexure P/5) addressed to the AGM (Admn), Raipur, has not been considered so far. Learned counsei further submits that the same shati be considered in accordance with !aw and on its own merit, as eariy as possible preferabiy within a period offour weeks. 2) in view of the categoricai statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, according to learned counset for the petitioner, nothing sun/ives for adjudication in this matter. 3) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. SatishK.Agnihotn Judge