THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.16749 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner, who claims to be a resident of Proddutur town, Kadapa district, filed this Writ Petition, being aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 3, in considering the representation made by him raising certain objections as to the licence proposed to be granted in favour of the 4th respondent for running a Bar & Restaurant at the premises bearing Door No.7/289 and 7/290 of Proddutur town. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. A perusal of the material on record shows that the primary objection raised by the petitioner is that the premises where the Bar & Restaurant is proposed to be located has no parking space and that it is situated in a residential area. Since the representation made by the petitioner was received by the respondents 1 to 3 on 24.7.2006, it is for the respondents to consider the objections raised by the petitioner before granting licence as sought by the 4th respondent. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 to 3, to consider the objections raised by the petitioner in his representation dated 24.7.2006, and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. It is needless to mention that the 4th respondent shall be given an opportunity to put forth his version as to the allegations made by the petitioner before passing appropriate orders. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 11th August, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.16749 OF 2006 11th August, 2006. Between: B.V. Karan Kumar Reddy. .. Petitioner. And The Commissioner for Prohibition & Excise. Nampally, Hyderabad and three others. .. Respondents.