BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13132 of 2011 VASUKI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.516/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.RAMU ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDY GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR BAIL UNDER SEC.439 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No.516 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the offence one under Section *307 IPC altered into 302 IPC. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the injured had gone to the house of the accused in a friendly manner. The other accused in this case is the husband of the present petitioner. Subsequently, the mother of the injured had gone to the house of the accused, where she found the injured with burn injuries on his body. On the basis of the complaint preferred by the mother of the injured, the present case has been registered. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the injured has been discharged on 30.09.2011 itself. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would take me through the first information report as well as the confession statement said to have been given by this accused. A perusal of the record would go to show that the injured had gone to the house of the petitioner with a bad intention by making sexual overtures towards the petitioner, who is a married woman. According to her confession, in order to protect her modesty, she caused those injuries. The petitioner was arrested on 24.08.2011 and the occurrence was on 19.08.2011. 5.Having regard to the nature of allegation made against the petitioner and the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and all other attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. 6.In the result, this petition is ordered and bail is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions:- [*] https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [i]The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal; and [ii]The petitioner shall report before the All Women Police Station, Kodaikanal, everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 10/10/2011 [AMENDED AS PER THE ORDERS OF HON`BLE COURT MADE IN MP[MD]NO.1/11 IN CRL.OP.[MD]NO.13132/2011 VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 20.10.2011 BY SNJ] / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KODAIKANAL. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, NILAKOTTAI. 5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL. 6 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. M.RAMU ADVOCATE SR.NO.36385. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13132 of 2011 Date :10/10/2011 2P/8C RPB : 11.10.2011 RPB : 21.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/