IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6768 of 2011. Decided on: August 19, 2011. Naresh Sood. Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) That the orders dated 28.6.2011 vide Annexure P-9, issued by the Respondent no. 3, relieving the petitioner from Dharamshala to Shimla may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) That the Respondent No. 1 may kindly be directed to redress the hardships by setting aside the orders dated 28.6.2011 vide Annexure P-9 by considering and adjusting the petitioner on other equivalent vacant posts as in ground (j) & (k) above without discriminating him when, the respondents have given the benefit of adjustment/retention at the same place or at nearby stations to other similar employees and even otherwise also in view of the ailment of the petitioner vide Anenxures P-14 and P-15, his approaching retirement, factum of couple case besides other hardships forthwith.” 2. According to the petitioner in the case of the similarly situated persons, they are adjusted in the equivalent posts. Particulars of a few are given in the grounds (j) & (k) of the writ petition. The petitioner has submitted Annexures P-10 and P-11, representations and the same are pending before the first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondents to look into Annexures P-10 & P-11, after adverting to the submissions made there in and also adverting to the submissions which are noted above and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of 2 production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. We are informed that the petitioner is on leave. It will be open to the petitioner to continue on leave of the kind due till orders are passed as above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 19, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (vs) Judge.