1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETIION NO.6072/2009 Ram Kishan Kaswan vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :3.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA. Mr.RS Choudhary, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner was transferred vide order dated 28th June, 2008 wherein it has been mentioned that he has been transferred on his request. The order dated 28th June, 2008 was challenged before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur. The State Government by order dated 3rd July, 2008 issued corrigendum and as per the State Government, in the transfer order of the petitioner by typing mistake it has been mentioned that he has been transferred on his request. The petitioner's contention is that he never requested for his transfer and, therefore, the order of transfer dated 28th July, 2008 is illegal. The Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal in order dated 5th June, 2009 accepted the plea of the State Government that non-payment of the relevant allowances to the petitioner has been mentioned inadvertently by mistake and his 2 transfer is not on his own request. Since the State Government has made it clear that transfer was not made on the request of the petitioner therefore the tribunal was right in holding that there is no illegality in the order passed by the State Government to transfer the petitioner vide order dated 28th July, 2009. Hence, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. cpgoyal/-