IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22756 of 2009 MANOJ RAI @ BADRI RAI, SON OF JAILAL RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANNORA, P.S. KALYANPUR, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The offence alleged is under Section 366 (a)/120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. As a matter of fact, victim girl and the petitioner have love affair and on account of that petitioner and victim girl married with each other. They are having child of two months. It is further submitted that victim girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. stated that she is aged about 21 years. However, the court recorded the statement she is aged about 19 years. She married with the petitioner with her own consent and living peacefully. Certified copy of the statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. produced by the petitioner is kept on record. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 34 of 2008 Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)