^"^ 1J GF/CT-oT^ In the Honble Hish Court of Chhattishgarh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P. (S) No. ^^^ 2006 ^hW<cl Petitioner .................. .^Srat. Janak Nandmi, Aged 50 years W/o Shri Bharat Bhushan Assistant Teacher, Govt. Navin Primary School, Padbhanappur, Distt. Durg ( C.G.) VERSUS Respondent... ... .... \y The State Govemment ofChhattisgarh. School E'ducation Ministry, Through the Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) D-i^M^ 2., The Blo^k Education Officer, ^ Durg(C.G) y Writ petition under articles 226/22'T pf the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, Certiorari, Prohibition and other suitable WMT or writs, Order or orders, Direction or djrectiong. » The petitioner, above named, furnishes fhe particulars of the wril petition as under :- \ fQ "•*° -/V ^- <^-5>n"/^.^"-' ..••" ^^/' .^s^- ^.^^" ^' -s' HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS&ARH AT BILASPUR SINJSI.E BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. P&titioner WRTT PETmON tS.) N0 712S OF 2006 Ku. Savita Soni versus Respondents State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and cno-rtier Petitioner WRTT PFTTTION fS.l N0 7126 OF 2006 5rat. Janak Nandini Sharma versus Resbondents The State Governnient of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner wprr pFrmoN rst NO 7127 OF 2006 Pramod famar Parakh verajs Respondents Petitioner Resoondents Present State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and anoffier And WRFT pFrmoN rs VNO 7143 OF 2006 Ku. Ri+a Poindey (Now-Smt. Rito Midira yersus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh anct ottiers re. Mr. Ajdy Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain, Ponel lawyer for the State/ qiondents. OltbER (Pttssed on -thrs 21"t cfay of Oecember, 2006) 1. Lepmed counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by fhe decision of this Court- in the case oi Yashwant Kumar ^hwwdv^/ vs. Munleval CapwwtiMi. toury wd aiwthe^. 2. (for the aforefflentioned reasons, ttie writ petitions are diqiosed pf in terms of the decision of this Court- in the matter of ya^iwanf{(umcu'Bharadwcy{Svipr^,subjsc^^o verification of the fact' as to whether the petitioners have acquired B. Ed. • Cert'ificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and furl+ier whe+her they hwe been lid two odvance increments or not. Noorder as to costs. 3. ^ copy of th is order be pfaced on the record of the connected >)(rit petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 Z006CTI)MPJR-C696 Bablu