IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.19976 of 2011 Date of Decision:21.10.2011 Amarjit Singh .....Petitioner Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. V.K. Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is for direction to the respondents to decide the suspension period of the petitioner with effect from 22.6.2009 to 26.8.2009 as required under Rule 7.3(1) of P.S.E.B. Main Service Regulations, 1972. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suspension period of the petitioner is not being regularised in spite of passing much time. Under Rule 7.3(1) of the said Rules, the competent authority is under obligation to decide the suspension period of an employee after reinstatement but nothing has been done. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent- authorities were required to regularise that period, but there is nothing on record that whether any such representation was made. Keeping in view the limited prayer of the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case such representation is made by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, the claim of the petitioner in C.W.P. No.19976 of 2011 -2- representation be decided in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter. October 21, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE