1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.282 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant V/s. Laxman Babu Jadhav & anr. ..Respondents Ms.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P, for the State CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 2ND JUNE, 2008 P.C. . This is an appeal for enhancement of sentence against the respondent Nos.1 and 2 who have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 427 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent Nos.1 to 2 have been convicted and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- in default to suffer further simple imprisonment for three months. In so far as Section 427 is concerned, they have been sentenced to suffer further R.I for one year and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- each in default to suffer further S.I for three months. Both 2 the sentences are to run concurrently. 2. We have heard the learened A.P.P and also perused the findings recorded by the learned Trial Court. We find from the facts recorded that there is a dispute amongst the members of the same family pertaining to property. The incident was of the year 2002. The learned Trial Judge after considering various aspects including a dispute between the parties after convicting the accused Nos.1 and 2 has sentenced the respondents. 3. In our opinion, it cannot be said that the learned Judge has not applied it' s mind to the facts while imposing sentence. 4. No case is made out for enhancing the sentence already imposed. In the light of that, application is dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) 3 (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)