1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. No.5001 of 2006 in MCA (Review) St. No.7763 of 2006 in W.P.No.435 of 2006 (D) (Wainganga Bahuuddeshiya Vikas Sanstha and anr. vs. State & Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM : D.D.Sinha and R.C.Chavan, JJ. DATE : 25.04.2008. Heard Mr. B.G.Kulkarni, Adv. for the Applicants and Mr.Kankale, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondents. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective parties. Perused the Civil Application No.5001 of 2006, which is moved by the applicants for condonation of delay in filing Misc. Civil Application (Review) St. No.7763 of 2006. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, delay is condoned. The Civil Application is accordingly allowed. M.C.A.(Review) St. No.7763 of 2006 Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties on merits and perused the impugned order passed. Perusal of the impugned order shows that, this Court vide order dt. 3.4.2006, 2 merely expected the N.C.E.T. to take a decision according to law and procedure applicable, after taking into consideration the reply filed by the petitioner to the show cause notice dt. 8.10.2007 issued by the N.C.E.T. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for showing indulgence in the limited review jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, the review petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssj