IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7626 of 2011 DHARMENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the house of Sakhi Chand Yadav was raided where the arms were recovered. Sakhi Chand Yadav named two persons, namely, Chunchun Yadav and this petitioner to have fled away from place of seizure. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the statement of Sakhi Chand Yadav has not been recorded in the case diary which has not been controverted by learned A.P.P. It is submitted on behalf of the State that other witnesses have stated that the petitioner fled away from the place of occurrence. The statement has been made in paragraph no. 10 of the petition that the 2 petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No. 75 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)