AB 240/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. SK Sinha, learned counsel for the accused petitioners and Mr. B S Sinh a, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor for the State. This application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by accused peti tioners namely Musstt. Rahela Begum Choudhury @ Rahela Begum and Musstt. Lechu Bibi @ Hasna Begum seeking bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Ka rimganj Police Station Case No. 586 of 2011 under sections 304 (B) of the Ind ian Penal Code . The prosecution case is that the informant’s sister met with an unnatural death within one and half years of her marriage. The learned counsel submitted that after the marriage, the husband and wife are living separately. However, this story has not been supported by witnesses. On t he other hand , independent witnesses have stated before the I.O. that even befo re the incident of unnatural death there was village meeting on the allegation o f demand of dowry and torture upon the deceased. Petitioner No. 2 is the mother in law of the deceased. In view of death of her d aughter-in-law within one and half month and other evidence available in the cas e diary, I am of the opinion that this petitioner does not deserve the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Hence ,prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner No. 2 i s rejected. However, with regard to the petitioner No.1, it was submitted that she is marrie d to another family and lives at another village. In view of the aforesaid statement, anticipatory bail is granted to the petition er No. 1 . The I.O. is directed to release the accused petitioner No.1 on furnis hing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the s atisfaction of the arresting authority in the event of her arrest. The petitione r shall appear before the I.O. as and when required for interrogation. Anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.