HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 18th May, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 357 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Sikhuresh Bahaduri S/o Shyamlesh Bahaduri ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 228 of 2010 U/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali, Ranipur District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Ms. Anjali Noliyal, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri G.S. Sandhu, the learned G.A. for the State. The applicant is not named in the first information report but his name cropped up during the investigation. The co-accused who was responsible for cheating and playing fraud by giving a job in the Railways has already been in enlarged on bail by an order dated 7th April, 2011 in 1st Bail Application No. 173 of 2011, Jagdeep @ Jagdish Vs. State of Uttarakhand. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting anything further on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 228 of 2010, U/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B I.P.C., on his depositing a sum of Rs.50,000/- before the court below and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 18.05.2011 Shiv