-A. P. f^~7-S ~? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI R.L. JHANWAR, J. IVIisc. A-ppeal No. 285 of 2004 Appellants Claimants 1 Smt. Rajrani Athwal, aged about 48 years, w/o. late Shri B.S. Athwal. 2 Amit S; Athwal, aged 20 years, s/o late Shri B.S. Athwal. 3 Ku. Bhawna Athwal, aged 18 years, d/o late Shri B.S. Athwal. All resident of Qr.-No. 6-B, Street SectorlO, Bhilai. VERSUS -8, Respondents Defendants 1 Anjl Khan, aged 34 years, s/o Mohd. Sagiruddin Khan, R/o Shrinath Babulane, Kolkata district Howrah, Kolkata (West Bengal) 2 Mohd. Muslim S/o Shri B. Khan, R/o Shivpur, Howrah, Kolkata (West Bengal) 3 The New India Insurance Company through Divisional Manager, Thakkar Chamber, G.E. Road, Power House, Bhilai C.G. 4. Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Plant, BhilaiC.G. / 5. National Insurance Company, Branch No.11, Bhilai, Thakkar Chamber, G.E. Roardt in front of Project Auto, Bhilai C.G. Merno of Misc. Appeal under Section 173 of the IVIotor Vehicles Act Present: Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Shri Sudeep Agrawal, counsel for the appellants. .^r^ W!&S,SS& ~"1 ^J ^fy None for respondents No. 1 , 2 and 4. Shri Shree Kumar Agrawal, Senior Counsel with Shri Anand Gupta, counsel for respondent No.3. Shri Raj Awasthi, counsel for respondent No.5. . ORDER (18th April, 2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. This is claimants' appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the 5 Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg (for short 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 29.11.2003, passed in Claim Case No. 108/2000. 2) As against the compensation of Rs. 19,70,0007- claimed by the appellants/ claimants, unfortunate widow and children of deceased Bhupendra Singh Athwal, by filing a claim petition under Seetion 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, for his death in the motor accident on 11.10.2000, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.6,82,500/- as compensation along with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of actual payment. 3) - The Tribunal on a close scrutiny of the entire evidence led before it held-'that deceased Bhupendra Singh Athwal died on ^ , / account of the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident on 11.10.2000; the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle Truck bearing registration No.W.B.03-8935; as the above offending vehicle Truck on the date of the accident was insured with the New India , :^^-t^fea.'^^ ;, 1^gs^,,'^ Insurance Company Limited and the Insurance Company could not establish any breach of the policy conditions, the Insurance Company was liable to pay compensation to the claimants. 4) As the respondents have not filed any appeal against the award, the above findings recorded by the Tribunal have now attained finality. 5) The Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased at Rs.7,500/- per month and Rs.90,0007- per annum. By deducting 1/3 of Rs.90,000/- towards the personal expenses of the deceased, the daimants' dependency was assessed at Rs.60,000/- per annum. By multiplying the annual dependency of Rs.60,000/- with the multiplier of 11, the compensation was worked out to Rs.6,60,000/-. By awarding further sum of Rs.22,500/- under other heads, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.6,82,500/- as compensation to the claimants for the death of deceased Bhupendra Singh Athwal in the motor accident. The Tribunal further directed payment of interest on the above amount of compensation of Rs.6,82,500/- @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of actual payment. 6) Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Shri Sudeep Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the Tribunal has erred in •- . / ' assessing the income of the deceased at Rs.7,500/- per month on the basis of his net salary; in selecting the lower multiplier of 11; and inawarding low cpmpensation of Rs.6,82,500/- only. 7) Shri Shree Kumar Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Arland Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No.3, the New "'S-s, •i-^i® India Insurance Company Limited, the insurer of the offending vehicle Truck, on the other hand, supported the award and contended that the compensation of Rs.6,82,500/- awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper compensation in the facts and circumstances of the present case. 8) Shri Raj Awasthi, learned counsel for respondent No.5, National Insurance Company Limited, the insurer of the Scooter, which the deceased himself was driving at the time of the accident, also supported the award. 9) Deceased Bhupendra Singh Athwal on the date of the accident was aged about 47-48 years. He was working as Junior Executive in Bhilai Steel Plant. His salary slip for the month of August2000, (Ex.P/23) reveals that his basic-pay was Rs.6,325/- and he was gettingdearness allowance of Rs.4,693/- per month. The above salary slip further reveals that Rs.579/- and Rs.120/- were being cteducted from the salary of the deceased towards income-tax and professional -tax. The total of basic-pay and dearness allowance of the deceased comes to Rs.11,018/- (Rs.6,325/- + Rs.4,693/-). By deducting the sum of Rs.579/- and Rs.120/- towards income-tax and professional-tax, the salary of the deceas^d relevant for the purposes of assessment of the N , / compensation comes to Rs.10,319/- per month, which for the sake of convenience is rounded offto Rs.10,000/- per month and Rs.1,20,000/- per annum, The Tribunal apparently has fallen into error in assessing the income of the deceased on the basis of his riet pay only. We, therefore, propose to recompute the compensation taking the income ofthe deceased at Rs.10,000/- per month and Rs.1,20,000/- per annum. 10) By deducting the usual 1/3rd of Rs.1,20,000/- towards the personal expenses of the deceased, the claimants' dependency is assessed at Rs.80,000/- per annum. 11) Considering the age of the deceased and his widow, we are ofthe opinion that multiplier of 12 would be appropriate in the present case. 12) By multiplying the annual dependency of Rs.80,000/- with the multiplier of 12 the compensation works out to Rs.9,60,000/-. The claimants are further entitled to receive Rs.5,000/- towards funeral expenses; Rs.5,000/- for loss of estate; and Rs.5,000/- for loss of consori:ium to the widow. The claimants, thus, become entitled to receive a total sum of Rs.9,75,000/- as compensation for the death of deceased Bhupendra Singh Athwal in the motor accident. 13) For the foregoing reasons, the appeal filed by the appellants/ claimants for enhancement of the compensation is allowed in part. The compensation of Rs.6,82,500/- awarded by tKe Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.9,75,000/-. The enhanced amount of ^compensation of Rs.2,92,500/- shall carry interest -^ , / . @6% perarinum from the daje offiling ofthe claim petition till the date of actual payment. 14) Respondent No.3 the New India Insurance Company Limited is granted three months' time for depositing the total sum of Rs.2,92,500/- along with interest due thereon @ 6% per •; i^^ ~i<!>?... W" " ^ II annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of actual payment, before the concerning Claims Tribunal. 15) No order as to costs. Sd/- L ChiefJustice Sd/- R.L. JhaBwar Judge subbu