1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.30742 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.636 OF 2011 Nilabai w/o Sahebrao Ghuge & ors. ..APPLICANTS VERSUS Dwarkabai Bagoji Sangale & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr S.I. Nandode, Advocate holding for Mr R.J. Nirmal for the applicants; Mr M.D. Joshi, Advocate for respondents no.1, 6 & 7 CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 2nd December, 2011 PER COURT : Heard. 2. This Civil Application is filed to take on record copy of the sale deed executed by Dwarkabai i.e. respondent no.1 herein, in favour of Balaji Eknath Sangale. It is the contention of the Counsel for the 2 applicants that possession of son of Prayagbai is admitted by respondent no.1 Dwarkabai. Therefore, this document be taken on record. 3. On the other hand, Counsel appearing for respondent no.1/original plaintiff submits that this document was not referred anywhere, either in the written statement filed before the Trial Court or before the Lower Appellate Court. The said document is having no relevance with the subject-matter involved in the Second Appeal. 4. Upon hearing the Counsel for the parties and upon reading such copy of the sale deed, I find that absolutely there is no substance in the application. Application stands rejected. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) amj/cast30742.11