HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Writ Petition No. 15565 of 1996 Between M/S Rayalaseema Technologies Limited, Hindupur ..Petitioner AND The Hon’ble Industrial Tribunal, Anantapur and others ..Respondents :: JUDGMENT :: 23.3.2007 HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Writ Petition No. 15565 of 1996 The learned counsel for the writ petitioner has filed a joint memo signed by the second respondent as well. In terms of the settlement worked out, the 2nd respondent has received an amount of Rs.60,690/- on 29.1.1997 and acknowledged the said receipt in full and final settlement of all his claims including that of reinstatement. But however, the learned counsel for the second respondent Sri D.Bhaskara Chary has pointed out that inspite of his sending a communication through registered post to his client indicating to him that the aforesaid settlement has been filed into the Court, there is no response from his client and therefore, he is not in a position to assert one way or the other in the matter. Since the joint memo said to have been signed by the second respondent in the writ petition has evidenced that he had received compensation of Rs.60,690/- in lieu of his reinstatement into service and other related benefits from the writ petitioner as a measure of full and final settlement of all his claims, I record the said settlement and dispose of this writ petition. The letter said to have been addressed by Sri Bhaskara Chary, learned counsel for the second respondent is also taken on record of this case. The writ petition is thus, disposed of in terms of the settlement said to have been worked out in between the writ petitioner and the second respondent, but however, without costs. _________________________________ NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO.J. 23.3.2007 psr