IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10698 of 2011 JAWAHAR MAHTON & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioners are not named in the FIR. It appears from perusal of impugned order that daughter of the deceased claimed to have seen the petitioners committing the alleged crime. But in my view, if the daughter of the deceased had seen the petitioners committing the alleged crime, their names would have certainly appeared in the fardbeyan of the informant who is none else than wife of the deceased. Furthermore, it appears that some witnesses have claimed to have seen the petitioner fleeing away from the place of occurrence just after the alleged occurrence but admittedly, one co-accused having more or less similar evidence, has already been granted privilege of bail by this court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioners, namely, Jawahar Mahton and Ram Babu Sahni be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)