IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43466 of 2010 1. GOSAIN YADAV 2. Anil Yadav 3. Rajiv @ Jichho Yadav 4. Birendra Yadav 5. Sushil Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission is that apparently this case is false one due to previous enmity. Allegation begins with earlier pendency of case filed on behalf of complainant. In that continuation, petitioner no.1, his son and two nephews are alleged for making an attempt to commit rape upon the complainant, snatching of her chain and ring without mentioning specific overt act. Theft is said ornamental. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 874 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Naugachia, Bhagalpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)