IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6008/2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5240/07 Chandrabhan Janjilal Ahuja ..vs.. Dinanath Pathrabe =================================== CORAM: A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATE:26.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this application, the respondent seeks correction of the judgment. It is the case of respondent that at page 6 of the order dated 7.8.2008, instead of stating “I am, therefore, not inclined to permit the petitioner to urge this point taken in the petition.” it has been mentioned “I am, therefore, inclined to permit the petitioner to urge this point taken in the petition.” There is an inadvertent error in the order. Therefore, the same is ordered to be corrected by inserting word “not” after the word “therefore”, at page 6 of the said order dated 7.8.2008. Registry to carry out necessary amendment. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE smp.