SCA/4197/1993 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4197 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE ====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ====================================== K R SHASTRI & others Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & others ====================================== Appearance : Mr. Nikhil S. Kariel, for M/s. Tanna Associates for the petitioners Mr. Kalpesh Pandit, Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondents. ====================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE Date : 27/02/2008 SCA/4197/1993 2/2 JUDGMENT ORAL ORAL Mr. Nikhil S. Kariel, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this petition in view of the statement on oath made by the deponent of the affidavit-in-reply in paragraph 8 and sub- paragraph 10, as under: “8. With reference to para 6, 7 and 8, I say and submit that the respondent will like to rely on the relevant orders. Government do not contemplate any change either in the Recruitment Rules or in the present set up of the Directorate of Insurance so long as the staff and officers of the Directorate attend their office work in an efficient and professional manner. Even after the merger, the Insurance Wing has been allowed to keep its identity totally separate and distinct from DAT. The pay scales, recruitment criteria, staff pattern and all related matters have also been kept separate. So the merger does not in any way alter the position so long as staff attends their work in the efficient manner.” Permission as prayed for is granted. This petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. The interim relief stands vacated. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to move this Court in case of difficulty. (ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy)