IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48085 of 2008 1. SHAHEEN PARWEEN @ SHAHEEN 2. Naznin Bano @ Naznin 3. Shagufta Yasmin @ Yasmin 4. Md. Danish 5. Zainab Khatton 6. Ghulam Mohammad 7. Md. Wahid …………………………………… Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.12.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A, 406 of the Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition act. It is submitted that petitioner no. 7 is not a family member. In the complaint case filed by husband of the complainant i.e. Complaint Case No. 1088 of 2007 against the complainant and her family members, they have been enlarged on regular bail. In the nature of the litigation between the parties nothing has been placed before this Court to grant any difference in treatment to the petitioners in view of nature of the allegations by granting them anticipatory bail. This application is therefore rejected in so far as petitioners 1 to 6 are concerned. Any application for regular bail on behalf of petitioners 1 to 6 shall be considered by the court below in accordance with law in like manner as granted to the accused in Complaint Case No. 1088 of 2007, keeping in mind grant of regular bail to the complainant and others in the complaint case filed by the husband when the allegations against the present petitioners are generalised and the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in 498A matters, without being prejudiced by the present order. Considering that petitioner no. 7 is not a family member let him surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Gaya in Complaint Case No. 1357 of 2007. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)