1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 11 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIN NO. 167 OF 2004 Hardikar's New Shorthand and Typewriting Institute ... Petitioner Versus Smt. Pramila Narhari Paranjape and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. V.B. Naik along with Mr. D.A. Ahuja i/by M/s. J. Shekhar and Co. Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Chandana Salgaonkar Radia, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2010 P.C. At the end of his arguments, Mr. Naik seeks to withdraw the review petition in view of the decisions of the Apex Court in Commissioner of Incomer Tax Vs Seth Govindram Sugar Mills, reported in AIR 1966 Supreme Court 24 and in the case of Mohammad Laiquiddin and another Vs. Kamala Devi Misra and Others reported in (2010) 2 Supreme Court Cases 407. The review petition is allowed to be withdrawn. At the request of Mr. Naik, it is 2 clarified that as the concession rendered on 21.9.2010 related only to the nonexistence of the firm that was registered on 21.5.1968 and any argument available to both the sides in respect of registration of the firm is kept open. Mr. Naik also seeks liberty to file a fresh suit by newly constituted firm bearing the same name. No liberty is required to be granted since the new firm being a new entity will always be at liberty to file a fresh suit. Mr. Naik tenders certified copy of the interim order dated 5.2.2003 passed by Small Causes Court, Pune on the application at Exh. 5 filed in Civil Suit No. 44 of 2003. This order is continued till 22nd November, 2010. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)