IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2010 / 14TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 22936 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. LIJU R., AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, PULIVELLAYIL VEEDU, PONMANA P.O., OALAMTHURUTHY, CHAVARA, KOLLAM, WORKING AS CASUAL WORKER, T.P.UNIT, KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., CHAVARA. 2. SUSHAMA R., AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.VENUGOPALAN NAIR, PYTHOLI PUTHUVAL VEEDU, NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM, WORKING AS CASUAL WORKER, T.P.UNIT, KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., CHAVARA. 3. G.RATHEESH KUMAR, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.KUNJUKRISHNA PILLAI, KIZHAKKE VEEDU (NADUVILA VEEDU), VADUTHALA, PONMANA, PUTHENCHANTHAI P.O., WORKING AS CASUAL WORKER, T.P.UNIT, KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., CHAVARA. 4. R.SATHEESH, S/O.K.RAGHAVAN, AGED 28 YEARS, KALYANI KIZHAKKETHARA, KODAMPANADU NORTH P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA-691552, WORKING AS CASUAL WORKER, T.P.UNIT, KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., CHAVARA. BY ADV. SRI.V.E.ABDUL GAFOOR SRI.A.MOHAMMED SAVAD RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., P.O.CHAVARA, KOLLAM-691 583, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LTD., P.O. CHAVARA, KOLLAM-691 583. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. M/S.B.S.KRISHNAN ASSOCIATES, SC. KMML FOR R1-2 SRI.K.ANAND (A.201) FOR R1-2 SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN FOR R1-2 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22936 OF 2010 (N) ===================== Dated this the 5th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are casual employees of the 1st respondent, who were engaged under the dying in harness category. According to the petitioners, by Ext.P13, Company had recommended for their regularization and the matter is pending before the Government. It is stated that, in the meanwhile, Company issued Ext.P14 notification for recruitment to the post of Worker Grade II, and that if the recruitment materialises, they will be loosing their chances of regularization. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. Standing counsel has obtained instructions in the matter, and according to her, the Government have by order dated 20/4/2010 rejected Ext.P13 proposal made by the Company. It is stated that, in that view of the matter, petitioners have no right whatsoever to object to Ext.P14. 3. Now that according to the Company, Government have rejected Ext.P13 proposal by order dated 20/4/2010, unless the petitioners succeed in invalidating the said order, petitioners WPC No. 22936/10 :2 : cannot seek any effective relief in this writ petition. Therefore, I leave it open to the petitioners to seek their remedies against the order dated 20/4/2010 issued by the Government. 4. Taking into account the submission of the counsel for the petitioners that they were not communicated order dated 20/4/2010 and also in order to enable the petitioners to seek remedies against the said order, I direct that, on the production of a copy of this judgment, 1st respondent shall serve on the petitioners a copy of the order dated 20/4/2010. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp