IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1895 of 2007 STATE OF BIHAR & ORS Versus MATHURA PANDEY & ORS ----------- 5 30.09.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 26.3.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge, F.T.C. II, Aurangabad in Title Appeal No. 87 of 2006/84 of 2006, whereby he has rejected the petition filed Under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In the opinion of this Court, this Civil Revision having been filed against the aforesaid order, which is interlocutory in nature, would not be maintainable in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur Vs. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in ((2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 659) and Surya Dev Rai Vs. Ram Chander Rai and others, reported in ((2003)6 Supreme Court Cases 675) as well as by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. 2 However, the petitioners, if they so desire would be at liberty to convert this Civil Revision into a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within two weeks after Durga Puja Holidays, failing which this Civil Revision shall stand rejected as not maintainable without further reference to a Bench. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)