IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3171 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 14, 2011 Bal Krishan Parmar .. Petitioner Vs. Parminder Kaur and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. J.S. Mehandiratta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.P. Setia, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This petition assails the order dated 2.2.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hoshairpur, whereby the application filed by the respondent- wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act has been allowed. The respondent has appeared before me and states that she is ready to go with the petitioner from the very court room. She states that she has four children and is suffering desertion also, whereas, the petitioner is levelling baseless and false allegations of adultery upon her. It has also been stated that the petitioner had also moved an application for restitution of the conjugal rights, which was withdrawn later on. Learned counsel for the respondent has also produced photo copy of his bank statement showing balance of `19,78,663/- besides, copy of the certain F.D.Rs in the name of the petitioner. That apart, the petitioner has purchased certain property from the year 2008 to 2009. As such, the petitioner being man of means could maintain his wife. The maintenance awarded appeared to be quite reasonable. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. March 14, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge