IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 18753 of 2004 Between: 1.Smt. Valusu Sunitha, W/o Sri Ramanatham, R/o House No. 4-298/B, Bheemaram, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 2.Sri E. Rajendra, S/o Sri E. Rajamouli, R/o House No. 4-298/A, Bheemaram, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 3.Smt. Adepu Kouslya W/o Sri Gouraiah, R/o House No. 4-298, Bheemaram, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 4.Sri Palle Ashok Reddy, S/o Sri Joga Reddy, R/o Gantupalli, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 5.Penumuchu Chowdaraiah, S/o P. Kistaiah, R/o Thimmapur Village, Yelakathurthy Mandal, Karimnagar District. 6.Sri Dongala Srinivas Reddy, S/o Ram Reddy, R/o Thimmapur Village, Yelakathurthy Mandal, Karimnagar District. 7.D. Rosamma, w/o Laxmaiah, R/o Thimmapur Village, Yelakathurthy Mandal, Karimnagar District. 8.Smt. Sandru Veeralakshmi, W/o Late Sri Kedari, Hasanparthy Village & Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Station House Officer, PS. Kakatiya University, Bheemaram Gram Panchayat, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 3 Sri Pulla Sadanandam, s/o P. Gattaiah, R/o Chintagattu Village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondents in not taking any action against the 3rd respondent and not providing police protection to the petitioners and their properties in spite of written complaint dated 4-10-2004 , is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide police protection to the petitioners and their properties, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.CH.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --- The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of the fact that they made a representation on 04.10.2004 before the second respondent-Station House Officer, P.S. Kakatiya University, complaining about the high handed action of one Sri Pulla Sadanandam and requesting to provide necessary Police protection to the petitioners as well as to their properties since they are apprehending danger to their lives, the respondents 1 and 2 have failed to take any action. The petitioners state that the said representation has also been received by the second respondent on 04.10.2004 itself. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 04.10.2004 and to take necessary action in accordance with law expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________ 13.10.2004 Note: Issue CC in two days (b/o) VGB To 1 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Station House Officer, PS. Kakatiya University, Bheemaram Gram Panchayat, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 3 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 4 2CD copies