1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3951 OF 2005 Namdev Damu Shine & Anr. ...Petitioners. Vs. Nasik Municipal Corporation & Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr. S. M. Oak for the Petitioners. Mr. R. V. More for Respondent No.1. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. January 30, 2006. P.C. Considering the earlier order of this Court, it will not be possible to grant the relief as prayed for. However, considering the contention of the Petitioners that he is entitled to construct in terms of the approved plan and has already applied for completion certificate, if any order of demolition is issued on the Petitioners by Respondent No.1, the same not to be acted upon for a period of two weeks from the date of service of the order on the Petitioners in order to enable the Petitioners to take such steps as they are entitled to in law. With the above observations, the petition to stand 2 disposed of. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)