S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1215/2005 Kishna Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 9.7.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Manish Shishodia, for the petitioner. Mr.VR Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Mr. M.L. Khatri, for the complainant. This is dispute in relation to interim custody of vehicle, which is a bus, which as per the petitioner was the subject matter of alleged sale dated 24.9.2002 and the purchaser and the seller both are claiming the custody of the vehicle. As per the order dated 21.4.2003, the interim custody was given to non-petitioner Jai Kishan on furnishing 'supurdignama' of Rs.1 lac and a surety of an equal amount. According to the learned counsel for the non-petitioner the possession of the vehicle has already been delivered to non-petitioner. From the order dated 21.4.2003 a period of five years has already passed and the trial of the case is likely to be completed in short period. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also filed a civil suit, which is pending. In view of the above reason, this Court directs the trial court to decide the main criminal case itself and thereafter pass appropriate order in accordance with law in relation to the custody of the vehicle. The order dated 21.3.2003 is not interfered with, in the facts mentioned above. Accordingly, the misc. petition is dismissed with a direction to the trial court to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the order. A copy of the order be sent to the trial court forthwith. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. Sanjay Tanwar/-