INTHEHIGHCOLJRI-ORCHI-IATT'ISGARHATBILflkSPUR WritRetiti6n(S)No.l5S3^00a. Petitioner: ResDondents: Rajendra Kumar Gupta, SA?^ late Shri H.S. Qupta, agMab6ut45'years, AssistantQra ll?RegidnalTransportOfficg,,Bi|aSRur:(CG).: \/eTSu& • ' • .•• :' • '-^:. 1. State of Chhattisgarh;' ThroughtheSecretarYTranspQrt, D.K. S.Bhavan, Raipur(CG).. 2. 'T'heTranSportCpmmissipner, , GovernmentQfChhaftisgarh,. •Pandri BusStand, Raipui"(CG), ^ -: , , . : . .:1 '-;/:,: •1 ."^•,....; :;. .:': ..:': ::'. ' .•': E.2? WVRIT PETITION UNDER ARDGLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ^^INDJ^ w ,X,~P y HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1553 of 2009 Petitioner RajendraKuaiar Gupta Versus Respondents State ofChliatdsgarh & aaofher WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,. (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) SIiri PaUav Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. ORDERtOrall (Passed on this lat day ofi?ebruary, 2010) Heard. The chaUenge ia tlus petition is to the suspension order dated 6.9.2007 (Atuiexure.P/1), witih. cQnsequeatial benefits. Leamed coiinsel appeariag for the respondents/State on (h.e basis Qf fhe averments laade ia fhe affidavit dated 10.7.3009 subinits that fhe itnpugned suspension oider has been revoked by order dafed 9.7.2009 (Aimexure R/l). Thus, nothiag siu-vives ia fhis petition for adjudication. In view of fhe above, fhis petition -has becQrae infructuous. However, so far as grant of consequential benefits is concemed, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to inake an appropriate application/representation to tfae concemed authorily to grant consequeatial benefits, in accordaace wifh law, if so advised. For the reasons above-Stated, fhis petition stands disposed of. No ofder asto costs. _. .-;„..—- ••!^>--^^ Tbakmite- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge