IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8379 of 2008. Decided on 6th December, 2010. Sumitra Sharma and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioners are claiming salary of the vacation period. This issue is no more res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 415 of 2000, decided on 1st September, 2008, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to release and pay the salary of the vacation period to the petitioners, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 06, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -