IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4533 of 2009 RAJEEV KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 10.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioners in CWJC No. 11489 of 2008 and analogous cases disposed on 25.3.2009. The petitioner is also a non teaching staff of the Project School during the phase 1984-85. The prayer, therefore, is for disposal of the writ application in terms of the aforesaid order of this Court. If the Court has considered similar matters and passed certain orders, it is for the respondents then to examine any claim before them of being covered by any orders of this Court. If the respondents find justification in the claim of the petitioner, this Court expects them to accord similar treatment to such persons without requiring them to obtain individual orders from the High Court, accordingly multiplying litigations and casting burden on an already overburdened Court. Needless to add that at the time of such consideration the respondents shall have the full liberty by independent application of mind, by passing a reasoned order to hold that the petitioner was not covered by a particular order of this Court which he claims, but the order of the respondents must set out reasons why that particular petitioner was not covered by any order of the court, but only after adequate opportunity to the person concerned to meet the grounds on which the State proposes to distinguish his case. The writ application stands disposed with the aforesaid observations. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)