IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36636 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.P.REGHUNATHAN, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.K.P.PURUSHOTHAMAN KARTHA, MUNNATHERY MADOM, NANDIPULAM, THRISSUR - 680 312, NOW WORKING AS LOWER DIVISION CLERK, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), THRISSUR. 2. T.A.MURALI, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.ANANTHANARAYANAN T.S., THULUVAN PARAMBIL HOUSE, MATHUVARA, THRISSUR 680 553, NOW WORKING AS LOWER DIVISION CLERK, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), THRISSUR BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATIVE (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE REGISTRAR (CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), OFFICE OF REGISTRAR (CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. /2/ 6. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), (CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY), THRISSUR. 7. THE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY, POOKKODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THRISSUR. 8. THE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY, MATTATHOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THRISSUR. By Govt. Pleader Smt. Anu Sivaraman THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.36636 OF 2009 (Y) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are working as LDC in the office of the 6th respondent. By Ext.P1, the 3rd respondent required the 4th respondent to intimate the names of two junior most LDCs for deployment to Local Self Government Department. It would appear that accordingly, among the claimants the name of the petitioners were included in Ext.P3. 2. Later, on being informed that there are employees who are still juniors to the petitioners, the 4th respondent issued Ext.P4 to the 6th respondent requesting for particulars of such employees. Particulars have not been furnished in response there to. At the same time the petitioner apprehends implementation of Ext.P3. It is in this circumstances the writ petition is filed. 3. Although, Government Pleader was directed to get instructions in the matter, no instruction is forthcoming in regard to the 4 persons mentioned in the writ petition. In the circumstances stated above, it is for the 6th respondent to consider the matter, in the light of Ext.P4. This the 6th respondent WPC.No. 36636/09 :2 : shall do within 2 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 6th respondent before 29.12.2009. It is directed that until a decision is taken on Ext.P5, Ext.P3 ins o far as the petitioners shall not be implemented. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/