IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 2ND ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 1420 of 2008(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOLLY KURIAKOSE ,W/O.KURIAKOSE PUNNOORPILLIL HOUSE,IRINGOL PO, KURUPPAMPADY. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, RAYAMANGALAM, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE KUNNATHUNAD. ADDL.R4: RAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT (SPECIAL GRADE) RAYAMANGALAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. (IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 16.9.08 IN I.A. 11643/08) ADV. SRI.N.K.KARNIS FOR ADDL.R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.1420 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner's contention in this writ petition is that Ext.P1 application, submitted by the petitioner for assignment of certain land, is not being considered by respondents 1 to 3. 2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 4th respondent - Panchayat also. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 4th respondent – Panchayat submits that they have no objection in the Government assigning the land to the petitioner. In the above circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 application and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with the Kerala Land Assignment Act and Rules, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 1st respondent for compliance. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd