IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 13257 of 1993 Between: 1. Sripathi Srinivasa Rao, R.S.I.Quarters, Guntur. 2. K.Venkat Rao,S/o Satyanarayana, R.T.c.Colony, Guntur. 3. T.Narasimha Rao,Age 34Yrs., Rajas Garden, Guntur. 4. G.Anuradha,W/o Bhanoji Babu, Chandramoulinagar, erd line, Guntur. 5. T.Srinivasa Rao, Age 24Yrs., C.6 ZPP Quarters, Guntur. 6. N.Jimbo, S/o Ananda Rao, Lalbahadur Nagar, Guntur. 7. B.Immaniel, age 32Yrs., 5yh ward, Repalle, Guntur Distirct. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its Chief Secretary, G.A.D, Secretariet Building, Hyderabad. 2. Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep.by its Chairman, Hyderabad. 3. Union of India, rep.by its Cabinet Secretary, New Delhi. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents as arbitrary, illegal and direct the respondents to implement forthwith the A.P.P.S.C. Selection list regarding Group IV-c of May,1989. So far as the petitioners are concerned, basing on their selection in accordance with the notification No.1/89 published on 2-1-1989 and selection made in accordance with the same notification by the 2nd respondent by appointing the petitioners to the Category of posts Group-IV-C in A.P. Government after declaring if necessary the A.P. Administrative Tribunal and Act 1985 as unconstitutional and ultravires and pass such other writ or order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.B.DEVADAS Counsel for the Respondent : Government Pleader for GAD The Court Made the Following : ORDER: There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 17.06.2004. Consequently the matter has been posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, the Writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. 24-06-2004 klp ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //True copy// SECTION OFFICER To 1. Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its Chief Secretary, G.A.D, Secretariet Building, Hyderabad. 2. Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep.by its Chairman, Hyderabad. 3. Union of India, rep.by its Cabinet Secretary, New Delhi.