IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2583 of 2009 1. MAHENDRA SAHANI, SON OF LATE BHORI SAHANI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARBANNA, P.S. BAIRGANIA, DISTRICT – SITAMARHI. 2. RAM LAKHAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAIRGANIA, P.S. BAIRGANIA, DISTRICT – SITAMARHI. 3. UMESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, SON OF LATE JWALA PRASAD SRIVASTAVA, RESIDENT OF VILAGE MAKURAHAR, P.S. BAIRGANIA, DISTRICT – SITAMARHI. 4. SAMBHU SARAN SINGH, SON OF LATE JAGARNATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHATIYA, P.S. RAMGARHWA, DISTRICT – WEST CHAMPARAN. 5. SHEO SHANKAR PANDIT, SON OF LATE JAMUNA PANDIT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAKURHAR, P.S. BARAGANIA, DISTRICT – SITAMARHI. 6. RAM BABU PRASAD, SON OF LATE SRI RAMJI SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SRIPUR, P.S. GHORASAHAN, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. 7. PRABHUNATH KUWAR, SON OF LATE BHAGWAT KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAGIRAHA, P.S. GHORASAHAN, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. 8. BINDESHWARI PRASAD, SON OF LATE KAWAL PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SRIPUR KASBA, P.S. GHORASAHAN, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. 9. LAXMAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE THAG MAHATO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SRIPUR KASBA, P.S. GHORASAHAN, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. 10. PREM CHANDRA PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAMDEO MAHTO VILLAGE – JAMUNIA, P.S. JHARKHAR, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. …………. PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, B.R.A. BIHAR UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARPUR. 3. CHAIRMAN, BIHAR THROUGH SECREATRY, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, PATNA. 4. SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (HIGHER EDUCATION), BIHAR, PATNA. 7. SECRETARY, R.B.P. COLLEGE, BAIRGANIA, SITAMARHI. ………….. RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------- 04/ 12.08.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are claiming to be founder non- teaching employees of R.B.P. College, Bargania. They claimed to be appointed by the Governing Body. The 2 grievance is that when the State Govt. has decided to grant financial aid to such affiliated colleges the Governing Body of the college has fraudulently submitted names of strangers in the list of non-teaching employees, excluding the petitioners, who are founder non-teaching employees. Petitioners should have approached the Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary) by filing their representations as their grievance can be considered by the Board itself. The list of teaching/non-teaching employees is to be supplied to the Higher Education Department through Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary) by the Governing Body of the College, for recommendation to the State Govt. for releasing grant. I do not find any merit in this application, far being entertained under the writ jurisdiction. It is dismissed. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)