C.W.P. No. 5030 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 5030 of 2010 Date of Decision:- 17.10.2011 Neelam .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manohar Lall, Addl. AG Punjab. Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Brar, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). The petitioner claims to be the daughter of riot victim. She further claims that being daughter of riot victim, she is in illegal possession of H.No. 1331-C, Phase X, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali for the last two years, therefore, she claims that the said flat which belongs to GMADA- respondent No. 3 be allotted to her. Learned counsel for respondents pointed out that in an earlier petition filed by one Amarjit Singh s/o Jodh Singh, i.e. C.W.P. No. 17981 of 2009, he claimed to be in possession of the said flat. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the petition there is no averment how the petitioner is riot victim. There is no evidence that she is actually in possession of the said house for the last two years. In absence of all these facts, we are of the C.W.P. No. 5030 of 2010 -2- opinion that no relief can be granted to the petitioner and no direction can be issued for regularizing the alleged illegal possession of flat in favour of petitioner, under the riot victim scheme. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 17.10.2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) reema JUDGE