1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 155 OF 2008 (Vasant Ramkrishna Chaple vs. Dr. B.D. Mahajan & Anr. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 08, 2008. Heard Shri Shende, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Deopujari, AGP for the respondents. The learned AGP points out that as per directions dated 6.4.2000, the petitioner was called upon to submit his comments upon Enquiry Reports within four weeks and after considering those comments, the disciplinary authority was to pass final orders within a period of eight weeks. He points out that even till today, the petitioner has no where stated that he accordingly replied within four weeks and submitted his comments on the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer. He points out that the petitioner has all the while insisted upon starting of fresh disciplinary enquiry. Shri Shende, Advocate states that the petitioner was not informed correctly by his earlier advocate. 2 It is not necessary for this Court to go into that controversy in this matter at this stage. The present Contempt Petition, as filed, does not make out any case for initiation of contempt proceedings. The same is, therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.