fasswswawwHWtjsSf.,- ^^ ^%3^^"" RESPONDENTS .'^'."l •^v, 1 S.R. KEU^ ) S? c^\^/i ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.l .P.fC) N0. ^^^/ /2007 Smt. Vimla Yadav,Wife of Shri Subhash Yadav, aged about 30 years, R/o. Village Pindari Balopat, Tahsil and P.S. Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS Dilmati Yadav, S/o. Abhivcharan Yadav Narmada Mahant, Sanjay Mahant Wife of /^4. Munu Bai, Wife of Jangidas Mahant All Resident of Village Pindari Balopat, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer (R) and Prescribed Authority, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) r21 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ SIIcSt'^1 r<-ii.<* 3(1^51 sftfh^ ^ffgtt Praveeii T ^SET-SIPIRTO, '®^fteTis.ftMiuy W*)?IT Wfl^) 3TT^?T XRT^ ^^..^^7 fq^I" 31I^rTOnW<tf?<T SB : Hou'ble Shri Maniadra 1 Pradhfen Mr. Raghavendra Ms. Meena Shastri, Mr. Suryakant Mi State/respondent No.4. counsel for the petitioner. couhsel for respondent No.3 ^hra, Panel Lawyer for the This petition has beeiji correctness and validity of tljie which the election petition dismissed bv fhe Election TriD)unal Leamed counsel for th; needs to be adjudicated on mj It could not be disp^ respondent No-3-M'unnu Bai| in the office of Sarpanch. provisi<|>ns In view of the Panchayat Raj Adhmlyam, 19(93 No.3 was elected as Sarpancl|i tenure ofrespondent No.3 is m this petition are now t>i<iln<ili IIICT ? 1yA <[«I«K ^aipin sii^i Blohan Siirivastava, J. iiled by the petitioner assailinj order dated 29"1 June, 2007, by filed by fhe petitioner has been ^ petitioner submits fhat this case brit. Lited by any of th.e parties fhat 'was elected on fhe vacancv caused contained- in Section 9 of fhe 'i, the penod for which respondent is 5 years. Therefore, the period of ifherwise over and the issues raised acadehiic Accordingly, this petiti^n is finaUy disposed of as having been rendered uilructuous. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge fTJtyT if<?^