WK @ Pi THE HIGH CQURT OF JUDECATURE AT BILASPUR WRET PETITION NO. 4%07 120% PETITKQNER Smt. F.Y.Khan, W/o $hri Abdui Arshad, aged M) years, Qccupatian- Service presently pasted a; Staff NurSe at Community Heaith Centm Dengargafh, DiStrict Rajimn dgaan {' 1G,)“ / ~VERSUS- State of Chhaitisgarh thraugh Sssratarv Departm cm 0f Héavith' an}! Fam ilv Wcifarm D.K.S.Bha.van, Rajpur {CG} Chiaf Médiaal and hmlth Officer, Rainandgaan {C(12) mack Medical Officar‘, Khairgarh, D istrint Kabir Dham BieckMc‘iical Dfficer, Cmnmunitv Health Centra‘ Dangargark Districi Rajn an dgaun (£16.) Chief M edicai Officer» Dantewara District Dakshin Bastar {QGJ WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 22§i227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF {NBIA FDR ISSUANCE {3F A SUH‘ABLE WRET: ORBERS OR DIRECTION. @ 3a aw,. mxg, ?Wg€ GRER} FS/B’SG 15.2.2005 Shri Rajeev ShrivasTava, co nsel for the pe‘rifioner‘. Shri SudhirAgrawaL Panel awyer' for ‘rhe S‘l'aTe/r‘espondenfs. Heard on admission. Learned counsel fo‘r‘ The pe Hioner submits 141a? the pefm'ioner was working as STaff Nurse in Comm ni'ry Heal‘rh Cen‘rrel Dongargarh. Vide order da‘red 31.7.2004, she w s Transferred from Dongargarh To She was relieved rom Dongargarh on 9.9.2004 and has Khai mgarh. joined of Khairagarh on ‘l'he same ay. The Transfer order was celled vide order da‘l'ed 13.9.2004 (Annexure P-Z). In pursuance to is cancella‘rion order, she was relieved from Khairagarh on 7.10.2004 (A nexure P-3). She submi‘l'fed her joining a'l' Rajnandgaon on 7.10.2004‘fro where 1he pefil’ioner viias relieved on The same day To join >a‘r Dong rgarh (Annexure P-4). Till Then The peTiTioner was having no grifvance. However, vide order daTed 26.10.2004(Annexure P-6), The eTiTioner was again Transferred from Dongargarh To DanTewara. Her ame appears aT serial number 15 in The aforesaid order dmd 26.10.20 Learned counsel for The pe iTioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner is a lady and she has been frequenTl Transferred by The auThoriTies of The STaTe, Therefore, presenTly she ay be allowed To make a represenTaTion /A 12/2000#50,000. g /’/ ’F/ 7 E‘ggi‘w §§§§€$ PLIL’07 «gEiZQG Lf "W aTé§fEWZ§ arwém W? ($m%> l ‘ w‘m 31% é ‘ I §¥W a“ XI—HC 78 WWW wgc mm (Wm) wmm mammmw ““W‘W‘ ‘L' Whwz¥wm aa—atmm before The concerned au‘l’horiw and The aufhor'i‘ry concerned should be directed To decide The represe.nTaTion wiThin The sTipulaTed period and The peTiTion be disposed of acco rdingiy. The aforesaid limiTed p‘ayer made by learned counsel for The V peTiTioner is noT opposed by The STaTe counsel. Accordingiyj The prayer is allowed. IT is direcTed ThaT peTiTioner may .file a represenTaTion wiThin a period of 10 days along wiTh The copy of This order and a copy of This wriT peTiTion and if such a represe ToTion is filed, The auThoriTy concerned shall decide The some wiThin a period of one monTh from The doTe of receipT/filing of The some by p ssing a reasoned order in relaTion To The grievances raised by The peTiTio er. WiTh The aforesaid iob‘ rvaTions, The peTiTion sTands finally ,7/. r {b disposed of. l; ConsequenTIy, Ii A. Nos. 31/2005 di 8886/2004 and M.W.P.No.4755/2004 sTand displosed of. /¢////S/dl_il§ \ / ‘i‘i sumiKumaY smhal “age K.