c'^^. '•.y'SOV "BP' 'ES'T/t.ZJT dn*r'fe'a'Tl»1l d^'BF rf^'S.J'U'A.'PflPTO/I.AISXJ. ^- WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^6Si OP 2009 1.' )^ ^. v^i ^.^bf ~.^cr^y .r /-^ya^ '••* h" <^'^' y" <?y i?- RESPONDENTS Shrirani Joshi son of Sadaram Joshi, aged about --46 years, Oceypation Serviee (L.D.T.') Poated at Balak Ashram, Jagargunda, Tahsil Konta, District Bastar;(C.G.) . R/o village & post Mohjari, Tahsil Lanji;DiStrict Balaghat (M.P.) Mosuram Maurya Son of Shri Meghnath Mauiya, aged about 45 years, Oecupation Service (L.D.T.), Posted at Balak Ashram, Burdih, Tahsil Konta, District BastarfC.G.). R/D village & Ppst Dimrapal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastai- (C.G.) VERSUS • ; 1. ' State o.f Chhattisgarh, • through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department,' Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Comn-tissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. 'Collector, District CoUectorate, Bastar, District Bastar (G.G.). 4. fThe Secretary',--Mata Rukhmajii Sewa .Sansthan Sainiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil & Districf Jagdalpur (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BtLASPUR WRITPETlTION(SyN0.5662 OR 2009 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Shriram Joshi & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writpe8UonunderArticte226oftheConstitution of India) Single Beneh: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. ^nihofri, J. Present: - Shri Amiyakant Tjwari, counsd for the petiUoners. Ms SunBa Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. A. Tumane ORDERfORAU (Passedon this 5 day ofOctober, 2009) 1. Wrth tte consent of teamed coun^ appearing for fte parties, the petition is heard flnally. 2. LeamedcQunselappearingforthepetittoneresubmitsthatttie in^tant petition is squarely covered by the decision of tNs Court rendered in Smt A. Lall v. Stote of Chhatttsgatti & Others , thusttiepeUtioneremaybepermtttadtomak8arq)Fesentattonto decidetheir case in the light ctfafore-stateddwision.subjectto verificatlon asto whether the respondent No.A Institute is a Govemment aided school and ttie petltioners are the teacher withinttiesanctionedstrength. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Stata submits that in ttie event, the petitioners make a representation, the same will be considered and decicted, m accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from thedate of receipt ofthe r^»resentation. 4. In view of foregoing, aecording to the learned counsel appearir^ for flie petitionere, nottiing survwes in thte petUon for adjudication. 5. Accordingty, Vhe writ petition is disposedof. ^-^ saP^so^^ ^^ 1 2007 (1)BU 265 IMil •t'ijli)f(tif<r^i3;llffl ITTT*}' '••'—"^^siS&^^ 'A»iyiMAl4iU3%ULU<ljK^UrfaiUB3SS^