GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4915 OF 2005 IN CRI. CRI. CRI. APPEAL NO. 842 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 842 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 842 OF 2005 Haseen Ahmed Qureshi & anr ...Applicant versus Ashok Desai and others ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Rakesh kumar i/b M/s.Legal Vision for the appellant. Mr. R.S.Apte for Respdt.9 Mrs. P.H. Kantharia APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & R.C. R.C. R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. CHAVAN, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 8TH AUGUST, 2005 8TH AUGUST, 2005 8TH AUGUST, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Application for restoration of writ petition rejected, in view of the fact that the writ petition was decided on merits. The petitioner has remedy apart from criminal complaint of filing civil suit or taking such other remedies as statutorily provided. The writ petition dismissed basically for availability of alternate remedy wherever it is necessary. Therefore there is no need to restore this writ petition. Petition accordingly dismissed. ....