CR No. 5784 of 2010 -1- ***** IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 5784 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.09.2010 Parsin Kaur .......... Petitioner Versus Jagjit Singh & others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. G.S. Chahal, advocate for the petitioner. **** VINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the order dated 19.5.2010, passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Sangrur, vide which the order of status quo passed by the learned trial Court on an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure stands vacated. The learned lower appellate Court in order to protect the rights of the petitioner has directed that in case the defendant / respondents alienate the property they would be required to make a stipulation in the sale deed that the civil suit is pending qua the ownership of the land, so as to grant protection of Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act to the petitioner / plaintiff. The petitioner, therefore, can not be said to be prejudiced CR No. 5784 of 2010 -2- ***** by the order, to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. No merit. Dismissed. 09.09.2010 (VINOD K. SHARMA) 'sp' JUDGE