CR 192 of 2007. 24.3.2009 Present: Mr. B.C.Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, counsel for the respondent. When this revision petition was taken up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the dispute has been amicably settled between their clients. They drew the attention of this Court to CMP 89 of 2009 which has been filed under Order 23 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure stating therein that the vacant possession of the premises in dispute was to be handed over to the respondent on or before 7.1.2009. It is undisputed before me by the counsel representing both the parties that such possession has in fact been handed over on that date. The compromise also envisages that the respondents will not claim any arrears of rent and that nothing is recoverable from the petitioner herein. This statement is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for the respondent. It is also agreed between them that now no other or further claims or disputes exist between the parties with respect to the present suit premises. It is directed that the terms and conditions contained in CMP No. 89 of 2009 shall form part of the settlement as arrived at -2- between the parties. This revision petition is disposed of. All pending applications shall stand disposed of and interim orders vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. CMP 89 of 2009. Heard. The terms and conditions as contained in this Miscellaneous Petition are not disputed. Parties have agreed to be bound by the settlement arrived at between them. This petition is accordingly allowed. The terms and conditions as contained in this application are made a part of this order and shall bind both the parties. March 24, 2009 (PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.