IN _ ____.. THE HIGH - _ ___—~——~\N COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.1spNo'. LMLS [2010 PETITIONER /‘; Om Prakash Gupta S/o Shrl Mohan Prasad Gupta aged about 38 years i R/o Ramanujganj, P S Ramanujganj, Dlstt Surguja C G ) VERSUS RESPONDENTS . 1‘. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). /2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department Ambikapur Surguja', Surguja (C.G.} \\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION “\M OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT i ,‘ or A‘m . _ M DIRECTION xx ' ORDER TO DO JUS_:1‘ICER. IN THE MATTER - m WMPC$)MH’QYX}DE 206 mmm ammm WW7§WW a; % E an M. : horn ‘ M me anri m I‘waniiiura s J i'v‘umlai-i i. H a'ruri‘v‘asia‘v‘a. J. G3aG8-201 0 3hri R.F.Sii1gh, counsei for petitioner. t e Shri Vinod Trek-am, Pai‘uei L f far ihe Biateiresp‘iicieiit$. a e Heal Q. ;;:_, me g peiidanei‘ ¢ Subimts that me petitEm’uer 33 eniitieti i0 benefit of ‘rwo advai ce ii‘ICI‘emems an accau'rui of he havmg paSseci B.T.i‘ eXamii‘la‘uon be-fore hi$ appoimmeii’i at his own uos‘n. it ifs $ubrnitted ih-ai frue Esme invoivea‘ in the meseni pétiiicm is no ior‘ger ies iii‘egra am? L.mo samé has beeii miv uemu bv ‘i‘né Hoo‘bie Suoreme Couif ii‘} Lthe ua5e OI : iiSIia a 5’Xeiia r ’v’S‘. f i‘viF. 6': $f$n lu3§ ‘m {iii} u ‘ mini}? mm t3i. I m as. an ‘ ii is iullner submiiieci ‘Li‘lai i‘h‘E Couri ha$ aiSfJ ‘Lakéi’l a $imiial View ii‘l if" order oateti 66-02-260§ oa$sed cooruoer for ihe oetirioner r‘urkher d 3 aiierrtior: of rhio Cour? io orcier daiod 2g-G4-26‘1'G paoseo‘ irr Wrii Apoe-ai Gofi24 of 266$, wherein reiying uporr rho juo‘grneot of trio Supreme Cour: Err e case of ii‘xeiia 3axerua (supra) arid ihe order paeserj bv this Coun‘ io ari ther Writ Aopeai No.87f‘2G6'E, oiireciioras 13V Learned Ccumei abpeafiiig f u -. mu. A _ i'rl WPIS)NO.625? of 2008. Learrie CL r W o: iiie ease for gram ef fvvo ari‘v‘erice a— Ime issueci .. U‘y’ ixme bfale e e u uhy’a i. e been issueci for eorisicierai iricremenie a3 per eircui-ar uareu -O" ”'“”“ Prae‘eei‘i, after verifieafieri of iiie fac S pieaciecf ir: ii‘ue pefiiierl. x Learrueci eourreei fer fhe re perrderifs suuinus that fhe caee of fhe pefifiorier vvouie‘ aieo 0e coheie‘ere eh ihe same iihee. n "a- in View 0f the eiaiemeni rrr cie above, fhie petitior: is fihaiiy oiieposed on J: mm- wun a . L: direciiori to the reepond hi aufhorifies fo cohsio‘er arid decide me r T‘i S fé O h i 2 r d mm (Wu) m zoo .aegw mmm ?12naTré’¥Ian'qiai Emma?“ mumffwm assimwéw ér cii‘euiar J 1 fmac‘i‘lya = , fa rracieax . after veriuc-aliori in i of a iaefiuu af eighi weéxs ‘ zwom ‘“may. ‘ \ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ciaim 0f ihe betitioner for gran? of _:,_;-_‘ M ,-..-. .m-H :.A a LU”. m uateu 4 I-uv-Ialq Ibsuea uy lne ma e ”n: me [361$ L pleaaea g x: ir‘l ume péliLiGH u Wiirlii‘l : avg{xx—; ‘ ~_n Sdl- two ari'v'aruce meremenis a$ 'p ®