IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24252 of 2010 PAPPU CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 21.05.2010 in a case registered under Sections 272,273 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it has come during investigation that the premises were occupied by Santosh Kumar Choudhary and Dhiraj Chaudhary. Moreover, Dhiraj Chaudhary has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc.NO.2020 of 2010. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has never been involved in similar type of case and statement to that effect has been made in paragraph no.10 of the present application. Considering the fact that the petitioner was never involved in similar type of case and similarly situated accused 2 has been granted bail, let the petitioner, Pappu Chaudhary, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-( Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Saraiya P. S. Case No. 225 of 2009. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)