IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2008 / 5TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 25504 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ R.K.MOIDEEN KOYA AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.AHAMMED KUTTY R.K.HOUSE, NADUVANNUR, KOYILANDY BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY VADAKARA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE SECRETARY THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY VADAKARA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 25504 OF 2008 J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of August 2008 J U D G M E N T Exts. P4 and P6 are under challenge. 2. By Ext. P4 though extension sought for by the petitioner was granted subject to settlement of timing, request for conversion as LSOS was declined. Against Ext. P4, petitioner filed M.V.A.R.P. No. 186/08 and that was rejected by the Tribunal. It is in these circumstances Exts. P4 and P6 are challenged. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made reference to Ext. P9 judgment where, orders denying conversion was passed by the RTA and confirmed by the STAT were challenged and was interfered by this Court and the matter was remitted back for fresh consideration by the RTA. I am satisfied that the petitioner is also entitled to similar treatment. 3. Accordingly, following Ext. P9 judgment and the judgments referred to therein, I quash Ext. P4 to the extent conversion is W.P.(C) No. 25504 OF 2008 -2- declined and Ext. P6 confirming the same. The matter shall be remitted back to the 1st respondent which shall consider the same as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-