s' ^ ^618 HSGH OOURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition <S} No. 1939 of 2008 Petitioners hw»»*w 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Versus ResponcSents 1. 2. 3. 4. Deen Bandhu Khaperdy, S/o Shri Bhagrathi Khaperdy, Age about 55 years, U.D.T., Govt. Giris Mictdte School. JanakpurWard, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Lakhan Lat Patel, S/o Shri Beer Singh Patel, Age about 56 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schoot, Aamajhota. Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Gokut Ram Mariaim. S/o Shri Ayatu Ram, Age about 55 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. N.D.H.S. School, Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (G.G.) Ghastya Ram Markam, S/o Shri Sukh Dev Markam, Age about 54 years, ^stt. Teacher, Primary Schooi, Poosaghati, Distt.-Kanker(C.G.) Naresh Kumar Sa4>utai, S/o Shri B.K.Sa4)utai, Age about 57 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. N.D.H.S. School, Kanker, Distt.- Kanker (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretery, Education & Tribat Department, D.K.S. Bhavan. Ralpur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) District Education OfRcer, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) Treasury, Account & Pension, Disft. Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 228 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Sjngle Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Shri AJay Shrivastava. Advocate for the petjtioners. Smt. Smitha Ghaj, Panel Lawyerfor the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of April, 2008) 1. The petttioners were appojnted initially, on a fbeed pay of Rs. 1(X)/-. The petitioners were thereafter, granted regular pay scale on comptetion of the probation period. %, /^.^. i i ^1!^^^ ^ ^^1^^^ 'ft I,Y ^:^.' '^s^-- Thakur The question of law invoh/ed herein is, asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of jnitial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counseS appearing for the petitioners, as wetl as teamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State, jointiy submit that the facts and question of law. involved in the present writ petition. are the same aslo that of in WP.(S) No. 813/2007 ( Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & anottier), which was adowed vide orcter dated 12.2.2007. tn view of the above-stated submissions made by teamed counsel appearing for the parties, frie writ petltion is allowed jn the same terms i.e. petJtioners are entltlect for regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of injtial appointment, subj'ect to verification ofthe facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge ^