IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14626 of 2011 1. RAMENDRA NARAYAN ROY, SON OF SRI UPENDRA NARAYAN ROY, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (NPA MANAGEMENT), STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, PATNA-800 001, RESIDENT OF 403, SHEELA RESIDENCY, EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, P.S. BUDDHA COLONY, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA-800 001. 2. KUMAR GAUTAM, SON OF SRI RAM KRIPAL SINGH (RETD. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES), RESIDENT OF ROAD NO. 4, CHITRAGUPTA NAGAR, P.S. KANKARBAGH, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA- 800 020. ---- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. RAJEEV BHARGAVA, SON OF LATE R.K. BHARGAVA, RESIDENT OF RAJENDRA NAGAR, ROAD NO. 6, P.S. KADAMKUAN, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2 27.4.2011 Cr. Misc. No. 57460 of 2007 was dismissed on 2.4.2010 for non-prosecution. The petitioners filed a restoration application vide Cr. Misc. No. 22201 of 2010. The restoration application was also dismissed on 30.6.2010. The petitioners thereafter filed a restoration application (Cr. Misc. No. 5723 of 2011) for restoring the earlier restoration application (Cr. Misc. No. 22201 of 2010) which was allowed on 22.2.2011 and the main quashing application (Cr. Misc. No. 57460 of 2007) was restored. Again the case was listed for admission on 10.3.2011. Nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the quashing application as such the case was once again dismissed. The present restoration application 2 has been filed for restoring Cr. Misc. No. 57460 of 2007 after dismissal on 10.3.2011. This Court finds that learned counsel for the petitioners has not appeared in this case even once. The main quashing application was not even heard on a single date due to non- appearance of the counsel for the petitioners. This Court finds it difficult to allow this restoration application in the facts aforesaid. In the result, this restoration application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)