IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.21755-M of 2010 Date of Decision:7.9.2010 Rajesh .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.59 dated 31.7.2009 registered under Sections 302/506/148/149 IPC at Police Station Rohrai District Rewari. It is contended that as per the allegations in the FIR, Pawan @ Rinku gave Pharsi blow on the head and Yogesh gave Jelly blow on the head as well as right leg below the knee, whereas, no specific injury is attributed to the petitioner. Besides, 14 other person are named in the FIR. However, they were found innocent during investigation. Surprisingly, the challan is filed only against Pawan and the present petitioner. As per the FIR, the role of the present petitioner is similar to the 14 other co-accused, who were found innocent. Moreover, a complaint is also filed by the complainant and in the said complaint, the allegations in the FIR are repeated. Meaning thereby, the complainant is consistent in his stand qua the role attributed to the petitioner and the other 14. Even then, they were Crl. M. No.21755-M of 2010 -2- found innocent. Thus, the major portion of his allegation is found false. Faced with above situation, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Udayvir, states that during investigation it was found that the petitioner had inflicted injury on the waist of the deceased. Whereas, no injury on the waist is mentioned in the post mortem report. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rewari. 7.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE