THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.1490 of 2010 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order, dated 25.01.2010 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narsipatnam, dismissing I.A.No.240 of 2009 in A.S.No.5 of 2007 filed under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC seeking to examine the Advocate Commissioner before the trial Court and to mark his report as additional evidence. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material on record. 3. The suit was filed for declaration and permanent injunction. In the said suit, the Advocate Commissioner, who was appointed to inspect the land in question, had submitted his report, for which, the respondents/defendants filed their objections, but the petitioner has not filed any objections. After the suit was dismissed and the above said appeal has been preferred, the petitioner now sought for examination of the said Advocate Commissioner on the ground that the trial Court has not appreciated his report in proper perspective. When there is an objection for the report of the Commissioner, the petitioner/appellant has not even attempted to file his objections before the trial Court nor specifically pleaded that the Commissioner be examined. By the order impugned, the lower appellate Court observed that the trial Court had elaborately discussed the report of the Commissioner and held that the same is not helpful to the petitioner. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the lower appellate Court after considering the material on record and several decisions relied on by the counsel on either side, has rightly dismissed the I.A. by the order impugned and the same need not be interfered with by this Court. 4. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:16.07.2010 sj