IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 7143 of 2009 Date of decision: 3.12.2009 M/s Sahib Cables and Wires Industries, District Jalandhar. ..Petitioner Vs. M/s Pragya Plastic, Delhi-32. ..Respondent. CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Sabina. Present: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. *** SABINA, J.(ORAL) Respondent decree holder filed execution application dated 19.3.2004. Petitioner filed an objection petition and same was dismissed vide impugned order dated 27.10.2009. Hence, the present revision petition. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be dismissed. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that when the petitioner had put in his appearance, the address given by the petitioner for service of summons for judgment was M/s Statesman Sahib Cables and Wire Industries, Industrial Enclave, VP Credo Randhawa Masanda, Jalandhar through its Proprietor Shri Trilok Nath. In these circumstances, the Learned Executing Court rightly held that since the petitioner himself furnished his address at the time of his appearance for service of summons, as stated above now he could not take the stand that the Firm M/s Statesman Sahib Cables and Wire Industries, Industrial Enclave, VP Credo Randhawa Masanda, Jalandhar was not his Firm. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by the decree, he is at liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate forum. Therefore, the impugned order does not suffer any irregularity or illegality warranting any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 3.12.2009 (SABINA) poonam-II JUDGE