IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7273 of 2010 KUSUM KUMARI W/O RAM PUKAR SAH R/O VILL. AND P.O.- DHABAULI, P.S.- MUFFASIL, BEGUSARAI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI 3. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI 4. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER (C.D.P.O.), BEGUSARAI, GRAMIN, BEGUSARAI 6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 7. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, DHABAULI PANCHAYAT, DHABAULI, BEGUSARAI 8. MUKHIYA, DHABAULI PANCHAYAT, DHABAULI, BEGUSARAI 9. KUMARI RADHA @ RADHA KUMARI W/O RAM DAYAL SAH R/O VILL. AND P.O.- DHABAULI, P.S.- MUFFASIL, BEGUSARAI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI ----------- 2. 27/01/2011 Grievance of the petitioner is in respect of selection process in which, as per her claim, a candidate with lesser marks has been appointed as Anganbari Sevika ignoring the petitioner. Paragraph 8.2 of the Government Guidelines dated 14.6.2010 prescribes for an appeal/representation before the Collector in such matters, which upon receipt, the Collector has to dispose of in a time bound manner. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the Collector in terms of said paragraph 8.2 of the said Guidelines. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)