IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930 WA.No. 1022 of 2007() ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25478/2006 Dated 31/01/2007 .................... APPELLANT(S): NOT PARTY TO THE WRIT PETITION: ------------------------- V.P.SAIDALAVI, AMAN HOUSE, FEROK COLLEGE ROAD, RAMANATTUKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI. T.P.KELU NAMBIAR (SR) SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS ---------------------------- 1. SARASA THOMAS, W/O MATHEW PAUL, VENDRAPPILLI HOUSE, EROOR P.O., TRIPUNITHURA. 2. HOLY FAITH BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD., REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, 34/2353, MAMANGALAM, KOCHI- 682 025. * 3. KERALA BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION (ER NO.121/06), REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, 372-A/47, PALLIKKAVU TEMPLE ROAD, VADUTHALA, KOCHI-682 038.(DELETED) *R3 IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DT. 10.9.07 IN IA. 740/2007. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO THE LOCAL SELF GOVT. (M) DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, GOVT. OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. W.A. NO.1022/2007 6. THE REGIONAL TOWN PLANNER, REGIONAL TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 7. THRIPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THRIPUNITHURA. 8. CORPORATION OF KOCHI, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, KOCHI-11. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA ADV.SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC.COCHIN CORPN. SRI.K.T.THOMAS SRI.V.M.KURIAN FOR R7 SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM FOR R2 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/01/2009, ALONG WITH WA NO. 1223 OF 2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY, Ag.CJ & V.GIRI, J. =========================== W.A.Nos.1022 and 1223 of 2007 =============================== Dated this the 12th day of January, 2009. J U D G M E N T Koshy, Ag.CJ. Learned Judge after quashing Exts.P3 and P7 directed to pass fresh orders on all applications filed on or before 28.8.2006. In view of the interim direction, this Court directed to consider the applications filed by the appellants also. Accordingly, orders were passed. Since fresh orders were passed in favour of the appellants, no further orders are necessary. Unless the above orders are set aside at the instance of any person, this order has to be taken as valid and can be acted upon. If anybody is aggrieved by those orders, they are free to file appeal. These writ appeals are disposed of accordingly. J.B.KOSHY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. V.GIRI, JUDGE bkn/-