IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 34 of 2010 Harmet Singh Cheema ……… Petitioner. Versus Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun and another .……. Respondents. Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Advocate for Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailendra Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Date of Judgment: 06.09.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) In view of the decision taken by the respondents to cancel the examination and to conduct re-examination, the purpose of the present writ petition has been served and, accordingly, the same is disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 06.09.2010 06.09.2010 Amit