IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42709 of 2008 SHATRUGHAN MAHTO, son of Pachu Mahto, resident of Village Bidupur, P.S. Bidupur, District Vaishali ----- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.442/06 for the alleged offences registered under sections 420, 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is Computer Clerk. The allegation is with regard to fraudulent payment against the cheque in question. It is submitted that the further allegation is that writing of token number in the cheque was interpolated by someone and a different token number was written over it and the informant alleges that he did not receive the payment against the cheque in question. It is submitted that the Bank has also lodged an F.I.R., as contained in Annexure 3, wherein it has been alleged that the holder of the cheque has received the payment and he somehow or the other got interpolated the token number over the cheque in question deceiving the Bank. Notwithstanding the above, it is submitted that the petitioner has no role with regard to the receipt or payment of the cheque in question. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender 2 in connection with Hajipur (Town) P.S. Case No.442/06 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)