IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3012 of 2011 Jaswant Rai Vs. The Union of India, New Delhi and others Present: Mr.A.K.Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner was working in a Bank and is claimed to have shown bravery, for which he was eligible to receive `50,000/- as grant, besides out of turn promotion in terms of a policy framed by the Bank. The Bank has declined the prayer on the ground that the role attributed to the petitioner is not reflected in the FIR. The Bank has, however, allowed `50,000/- to a gunman for showing bravery in the same incident. The counsel has referred to certain documents to point out that the petitioner has also shown bravery and was injured also. It would be well within the knowledge of the Bank as to who had performed which act as incident was inside the Bank. To contest the same would mean that the court is being asked to go into disputed questions of facts, which may not be within the scope of writ. I am also not fully convinced that the policy as framed by the Bank would be enforceable through writ. Prima-facie, the policy introduced by the Bank is not statutory or of a binding nature. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. February 17, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE