[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.740 OF 2005 Abdul Kadar Shaikh ..Petitioner Vs. CEO, Slum Redevelopment Authority and & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.G.S.Godbole with Mr.Asif I.Patel Advocate for Petitioner Mr.G.D.Utangade Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.M.More AGP for Respondent No.3. Mrs.A.K.Savla Advocate for Respondent Nos. 7 & 8 Mr.Kamlesh Patel for Respondent No.5 in person present ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 16, 2006 DATE : JUNE 16, 2006 DATE : JUNE 16, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioner claims an independent right in SRA Scheme. The authorities concerned after considering the matter, have rejected the claim of the petitioner. Another reason given is that the petitioner was found residing with his mother. In the Electoral Roll, mother is at serial No.618 and [-2-] the petitioner is at serial No.619 G-40. Once that be the case, the authorities below were right in rejecting the claim of the petitioner. We make it clear that we are not deciding the right or any claim of Shaikh Famida Umerali. 3. With the above observation, petition stands disposed of. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]