IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO:28126 of 2008 Between: K.Prabhakar, S/o. Laxmaiah, R/o. Togarpalli Village, Kondapur Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, (Civil Supplies), Medak District, at Sangareddy 2 The joint Collector, Medak District, at Sangareddy 3 The Tahasildar, kondapur Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 1st Respondent not disposing the revision despite the elapse of more than two months is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and as such the same is declared as illegal and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent to revoke the suspension order passed dated 23.10.2008 in impugned proceedings No.B/127/2008 suspending the authorization of the petitioner's Fair Price Shop Dealership of Togarpalli Village, Kondapur Mandal, Medak District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and unconstitutional besides being violative of principles of natural justice an consequently set- aside the same by entitling the Petitioner to function as Fair Price Shop Dealer. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SYED LATEEF Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in not disposing of the revision filed before him by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order, dated 21.07.2008 passed by the second respondent, as arbitrary and illegal. There is no necessity of going into all the details. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has already filed a revision petition before the first respondent aggrieved by the order, dated 21.07.2008 passed by the second respondent in dismissing the appeal filed by him. The grievance of the petitioner is that so far, no orders have been passed thereon. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the revision petition purported to have been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order, dated 21.07.2008 passed by the second respondent, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ________________ C.V.RAMULU, J 24th DECEMBER, 2008 kvni