IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-23855 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.8.2009 Kartar Singh .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. D. S. Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Rajesh Bindal J. This is a petition for issuance of a direction to respondent No. 2 to look into complaint (Annexure P1) filed by the petitioner and take appropriate action as per rules. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner submitted complaint (Annexure P1) to respondent No. 2, but no action has been initiated on the said complaint. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U. P. and others, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 392, such a petition for direction to the police for investigation or registration of FIR could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra-ordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 27.8.2009 mk