1 IN HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 211 of 2007 The Commissioner of Central Excise Thane-I, Commissionerate. ... Appellant Vs. M/s. A.J.Brothers Ltd. ... Respondents Mr. Rohit B.Pardshi,Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Jitu Motwani with Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/.b.PDS Legal, Advocates, for the respondents CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 14th July, 2009. P.C. 1. On behalf of the appellant, the learned Counsel submits that the 2 Appeal can be disposed of in terms of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Union of India vs. Dharamendra Textile Processors, 2008 (231) ELT 3 (SC). 2. Considering the above, as the demand was of Rs.6,62,221/-, the penalty would have to be in the sum of Rs.6,62,221/-. In the light of that, the impugned order of the Tribunal is set aside and the penalty under Section 11AC in the sum of Rs.6,62,221/- is confirmed. Appeal disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)