1 c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OE CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIONUNEER ARTICLE 226/22'Z.,OE _,_^fLL._._____ '- THE CGNSTnffiFION OF DMDIA * WRIT PETITIONNGfc OF 2004 PETITIONiER ..•• ^^ ^^ &^~ 1»'^"' ^.^'SP?-"^ ..•• ^^"" JAI BUDHADE'V SELF HELP GROUP, ACTmG THROU0H FTS PRESIDENT SANTOSH KUMAR DHURVE, S/o.SITASAM EttlURVE ^gL^.^^t ^Di-ajKyts, sio.sLipLtUM ^'"^is'r //<A©EDABOUT 29'mARS, .^"" > / K/FIVTTJ A(~ffiRTRi?ryMAy R/O.VILLAGE BIRKONA? TAHSIL KAWARDHA, DISTRICT KABIRDHAM CC.G.). VERSNS RESPONDENTS 01) STATEQFCHHATTISCjARM W' ^,^£~ ^. ^ 02) 03) 04) &SOCIALWELFARE I^AItrMENT,GO^'FERlsMBM^Q^ CHHATTISGARH, D.KL.S.BIMVAN, RAB>UR(C.G.) JANPAD PANCHAyAT, KAWA HA,ACTD<KjTHRQUGH ITS CHIEE EXECLJTI]yE Gffi'FICER, DISTRJC'I' KABIRDH^M (|Ci©.). DIRECTOR,PANCHAYATAND SOeiAL WELFARE, GC^ERNMENTOF CHHATTESGARH(RAlpyK) JAILjA3£MISELFHEI^|CiiyL)1HP CBHAD^MAiES¥A:S^^^ '\?II.LA©E!BIRKONA,ITXHS!IL K.S^ATOI^raSTB^ KAilRDHA3\<I.(^.G.).!.A£'Il]:I'ff^. ISIRiWGHITSPRESIDEN'Ii |ii n l''^~; •"^":r'f^.' WRIT PETITION CNDER ARTICLE 226327 CW THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANGE OF APPROPRtATE WRIT / WRItS, ORDER / ORDERS DBRECTIONyDIREt'TIONS ETC.^ aa^aq? ??'^t&^GK!?H ^ X t. u .ii-t^ <-wa^)<<, •®A<!I*IS,Sna^y flwarai*M«* it^.^AU^ 6-2-2004 Shri K.A. AnsQri,counse( Miss Sharmila Singhai, E respondents 1 to 3. Smt.Renu Kochar, Heard. The petitioner. has 226/227 of the Gohstitution dated 13-1-2004 passed by No.50-B/12t/2003-04whereb^ rejected thestoy application o'i Brief facts giving rise -^ ' group was gron'ted a leose o^ purposes of fishin9 and <»ri a^ on 20-12-2002 fop a period o| Sahaita Sainuh aibmitted ah 1 t)e^)ite the| foct thdt there was not properly constitut?cl^ orderdated 8-12-2003 t»nd Chief Exeajtive Officer, pursuanca of this order- Ponchayoit, • Kawdrdha has ' di] for the petitioner. eputy Sovt. Advocate takes notice for couns^l for respondent No.4. «iH'(ff's^^^B^y1^^B^^l^st » prje'ferred this petition under Articles |»f Ind'ia, being ttggrieved by -the order j+ie tiiRector of Panchayat in revision the leamed Director of Panchoyat has the petitioner. |o this petition are tha-t- thejpetitioner C>arri tank of village Birkona for the heemeht. Annexure-P/lQ, was executed j: 10 years. Against that l.akshmi Swa Ippeal before the Colleetor, Kawardha. 4ais no ground of oppeal and the oppeal The ColtecTor allowed The appeal vide c4icelled theorderdated 23-12-2002 of »|iinpad Panchayat, Kiawardha and in t|e Chief Exeeutive Gffice;r, iJanpad j^cted the petitioner to hany over w dilAWW 8?<Wi a^B a^s ^^a \J ^•a)»()j^j^t<j,aialwis, Riowiii.t sn^ ^g» WtW flKIRS -H^ asStfl ?<ait8<t -yisa "2- possession of tarik to Janpad challehged the order of Collecto< the revision before 'the Directoij and the petitioner hdsputin fish AfTer the execution of The execution of the order of Colle) Panchayathas rejected the stay allowed to The petitioner to tak^ 12-2-2004 cmd the revisionis pendj I have heard the learned Learned counsel for the p^ has already deposited the lease tdking the tank on tease •tfte peti'j tank in the first instance of Rs.-4i instcnce the petitioner put thj 21,000/-. The petitioner has depf: money i.e. Rs.10,523 and 10,532 » 1 Therefore, the petitioner should. On theother hand, learnedl that •t+ie Collector found tha'l Ponchayat, Birkona executed OL ahy decision could have been agrtement, leafce q>)<^'l^ SWvS^ fc*3 ^aS^t ^T ^Effl <Slt2[% Panchayat. The petitioners have ?|' dorted 30-8-2003 by way of filing j, Panchayat, 6ovt. of Chhattiqarh ^eeds worth Rs.40,700/- in the tonk. r, dn tipplication for stay of ^tor was moved, but the Director, ^pplication aaid one month's time was out the fishe^ from The tonk by (n9 before the Oirector, Panchayat. co|insel for the parties. ll-itionsr submits that the petitioner |noney up to June, 2004 and after |k>ner hos put th®fjsh seeds in the 160Q/- and 4900/- ond in the second •i^ fish %eds of Rs.10^00/- and ><>sited two instalments of the lease |n the Jonpad Panchayat, faryalaya, .t^allowed to continue fishing. |counsel for re^)ondent No.4 argyed the Executive Officer, Joaipad in favour of the petitioner before tal^en by Janpah Panchoyat andl order w ffii-ac-22- sa^i^! a^CT h:ii^f<* ^i^n ^' •3^^ICTra'f, a-ulwn, fa'araa'^ SII^T jaa^ *!PW<) aiiif M 2fl0 ' fa'tK^T' ^if^^fl ^t<iNt^i%^ •3' were passed by the Collector to Panchayat took the decision on got vacated from the petitioner Janpad Panchayat resolved to gi N0.4 ond executed the lease d< 5th June 2004. Having heard the leamed <til<ll<!Wl'l +l|t|fif'ff fe'ci tfa*sy< ^T o^a*i!oit^H set aside the lease deed. The Janpad 22-12-2003 that the tank should be md vide resolution dated 31-12-2003 ye the pond on lease +o respondent in favour of respondent No.4 on cbunsei for the parties ond having regard to the focts ond circumstijinces of The case,|if the lease money has already been deposited by •ijhe petitioner till June 2004 and in pursuance of the execution of th| agreement of the Chief Executive, Jonpad Panchayat the petitioner ^ut the seeds of the fish in the pond amounting Rs.40,000/-. I deem i^appropriate to direct the Oirector, Janpad Panchayat to decide theijevision within a period of one month ond till th®nthe petitioner should |iot be dispossessed from the tank, With the direction aforesfl|d, the writ petition stcmdsdisposed of. Parties are entitled for cert] fied copy of this order. Sdi- L.C.BHADOO Judge IIs