^n -'4 HIGHCOURTOFeMHATTISGARHATBILASRUR Writ Petition <S\ No. 4108olZQQ8 Petitioner Respondents Vereus 1. 2. 3. 4. Nandan Sahu, aged about 61 years, S/o Late Shri Chhetu, Occupation - retired Gangman _(Laboui) in perrrianent gartg, Office of Sub Dh/isional Officer, Sub Diyision No,2, FWD,-Dutg, Tah & Dist.- Duig (C.G.), resident of Gram Post Basni, Tahsil Dhamdha. Distrrct Durg (CG). State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Public Works Department, DKS. Bhawan, Raipyr(!GJQ) EngineeMn-Chief, PuUjc Works Deparbnent, near "Raj Bhawan", Disfrid-Rajpur(C3B.). ExecutJN'e ^Engineer, Public Works DepatSnent,Distrrct-Dyig(e.GJ The Stifc> Divisronal Offlcer, Sub Dhrtsion N0.2, Publte Woric Depatfinent, District- Dyrg (C.G.) WRTT PETITOINUNDERARTICLE2260FTHE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K. Agnihofri, J. Shri Rakesh Anthony.Advfteateforthepetitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, DqiufyAdvocate Generat for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passad on ttiis 29th day <rf July, 2008) J»- 1. 2. Wrth the consent of learned counsel appearing for ttie parties thematter is heard finally. Leamed counset appearing for the petiGoner submits ffiatthe petitioner, being a permanent gangman, is entitl®!toserve up fe) the age of 62 yeare, in the light of the judgment and order passed in the matter of -Oovind & others \fe. State of C.G. &0thers {2Q07 (2) C.9,M.N. wherein It is held that the permanent ggngmen are enUtted to l^ retired ijia ili 4. Thafcur -^ ^T- onattaining the age of 62 years, in irecorelance w the provisions <rf the Chhatlisgarh Shaskj^i Seyak (Adhiyarshjfd-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967. Learned counsel fiirthersubmits that Uiis has been clarified by the Public Worte Department, Govemment of Chhatfisgarh. In its circular dated 3.9.2007 (Annexure P/1) also. Despite that, the pefifioner has been asked to reiire on attaining ttie ags of 60 years. Be that as it may, when the matter has been adjudicated and proper order has been passed by tte State Government, consequent thereupon.it is not necessary to adjudicate upon. The i^tioner mayfite a representation before Bie concemed authority to deckte his representation in view of the judgment and order pa^ed in the matter of Govind (supra) and the order datsd 3.92007 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Stat®^ovemment, In tt»eevent representation, if any, is made by the petitioner, the same shalt be consictered and dedded, in accordance wth law, within a period oftwo weeks from the date of representation. Withthe aboved'ireGtion.thispelitionstandsdtsposedof. ^y awtn