C.W.P No. 15176 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 15176 of 2008 Date of decision : August 28, 2008 Smt. Urmila Matkan, ...... Petitioner through Mr. Dinesh Malhotra, Advocate v. Bank of India & others, ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J The present petition has been filed challenging the demand notice, dated 26.12.2007, issued by respondent No.1-Bank, under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short “the Act”). It is not disputed that an earlier notice also issued under Section 13(2) of the Act was challenged by way of filing CWP No.12666 of 2004, which stands decided. Counsel for the petitioner has urged that the decision of that writ petition would not impact the present petition, since the issues raised herein were not decided by this Court in the earlier case. In our opinion, this would be no good ground for adjudicating C.W.P No. 15176 of 2008 ::2:: this writ petition, since the same would be hit by the doctrine of res judicata/ constructive res judicata. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed, with, however, no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE August 28, 2008 'kk'