IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2010 / 10TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15198 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- A.B.SABU, AGED 53, S/O.A.K.BHASKARAN, AYYANGATH HOUSE, POONITHURA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COCHIN CORPORATION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE MAYOR, COCHIN CORPORATION CORPORATION COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM. 3. T.K.RAMAKRISHNAN CULTURAL TRUST, PACHALAM P.O., NEAR P.J.ANTONY SMARAKA CULTURAL CENTRE, PACHALAM REP.BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE. 4. E.K.NARAYANAN SMARAKA TRUST EDACOCHIN, REP.BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE. 5. KORU ASAN SMARAKA TRUST, PONNURUNNI REP.BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE. 6. COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA (MARXIST) REP.BY ITS DISTRICT SECRETARY, LENIN CENTRE, COCHIN-17. 7. SECRETARY TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 8. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO REVENUE AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 9. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS CHEIF SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM. SHRI S.RAMESH BABU FOR R1 & R2 SMT.S.SUDHA DEVI FOR R6 TO R8 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.15198/10 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENTS 7 AND 8 AND BEFORE THE MINISTER FOR REVENUE AFFAIRS. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE BUDGETARY RESOLUTION AND THE FORWARDING LETTER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER REPORT WITH REGARD TO THE ATROCITIES COMMITTED AGAINST THE OPPOSITION MEMBERS PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DT.7.5.10. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT WITH PHOTOGRAPH SIGNING THE SAME BY JUSTICE SHRI V.R.KRISHNA IYER. TRUE COPY T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.15198 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the resolution taken by the Council as evident from Exhibit P2. The objections raised by the petitioner are in respect of item Nos.4, 5 and 6. The learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation submitted that in the light of the controversies that have arisen, Corporation is withdrawing the decisions in respect of items 4,5 and 6. It is also submitted that the Corporation will place the entire matter in a properly convened meeting of the Council for its consideration. The same is recorded and the Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn