1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Writ Petition No.1500 of2008 Shri Suryabhan Maruti Avhad .. .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Mah. & ors. .. .. Respondents Ms.Tripti Shetty for Petitioner. Mrs.V.R. Bhosale, APP. ---- CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. Dated : 17th August, 2009 P.C. : 1.We have heard Ms.Shetty, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2.The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Nashik thereby accepting the C-Summary Report submitted by the Police into the investigation made on a complaint filed by Shri Sanjay Tanaji Kanoor on 28.10.2006. The said complaint was not filed by the Petitioner and, therefore, the Petitioner has no locus to challenge the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Nashik. 3.Even otherwise, from the record, we have noted that on 2 the charge of submissions of bogus diesel bills, the Petitioner was proceeded against by his employer and was removed from the service. He had approached the Labour Court, but did not succeed in getting the relief of reinstatement. The incident was stated to be of 17 th February 2003 and the complaint, for the first time, was lodged by Shri Sanjay Tanaji Kanoor on 28.0.2006. The company had deputed some of its officials to visit the petrol pumps at two different locations and the action of dismissal from the service was taken against the Petitioner. We have perused the report submitted by the Police which has been accepted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class. Even if the complainant was aggrieved by the same, he could have filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Sessions Court. The complainant is not before us. 4.The Petition is rejected. [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]