IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18282 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ABRAHAM MATHEWS, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.LATE M.E.MATHAI, U.D.CLERK, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, RESIDING AT: KANNANPARAMPIL MURUPPEL, KUZHIKKALA P.O., KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 4. MANAGER, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 5. N.R.USHA, A.R.CASHIER, DPO ALAPPUZHA (UDC KAP III BATTALION, ADOOR). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON ON 11/06/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.18282 OF 2010 (I) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P4 order, petitioner was promoted as Store Assistant and was posted to K.A.P, IV Battalion, Kannur. 2. Aggrieved by the posting, he approached this Court by filing WP(c).No.13676/2000. In that writ petition, this court passed Ext.P5 order directing to consider the request made by the petitioner for modification of the transfer order. On the day previous to Ext.P5 order, Ext.P6 order was issued reposting the petitioner to Wayanad. 3. After making representation against Ext.P6 order, petitioner again approached this court and filed WP(c). No.14308/2010. That writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P8 judgment directing that Ext.P7 representation be considered. 4. Subsequently, in compliance with Ext.P5 order passed by this court in WP(c).No.13676/2010, the 2nd respondent issued Ext.P9 order, posting the petitioner as Cashier, DPO Idukki. 5. Petitioner is still aggrieved and has now approached this court on the 3rd occasion, stating that there are vacancies in Pathanamthitta and Alappuzha and that he should be considered. WPC.No. 18282/2010 :2 : 6. As already seen the request that was directed to be considered in Ext.P5 order was that he should be posted in a place near to Pathanamthitta. By Ext.P9 order, that request has now been allowed. Therefore, this court will not be justified in again directing that the petitioner should be accommodated either in Pathanamthitta itself or in Alappuzah District. Therefore I am not persuaded to entertain the writ petition. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/