WP(C) 4001/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N.SARMA The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is the notice of no confid ence motion dated 31-3-09 issued against the petitioner. The petitioner is the President of 15 No. Dakhin Sarukhetri Gaon Panchayat. Seve n out of ten members having lost confidence against the petitioner, raised a no confidence motion on 31-03-09, The petitioner not having convened the meeting, t he Secretary of the Gaon Panchayat intimated her to convene the meeting on 14-9- 09. It is further contended that on earlier occasions certain allegations were l evelled against the petitioner by some members praying for necessary enquiry an d the matter was inquire through the BDO of Sarukhetri Development Block in whic h some of the allegations were not found to be correct and no opinion was furnis hed regarding other allegations. Thereafter the no confidence motion was issued against the petitioner. It is contended that the signatures of two members of th e Panchayat having been found forged only five members brought the no confidenc e motion against the petitioner. Whether the signatures of the two members are f orged are the disputed question of fact which cannot be decided by this Court at this stage. Mr. J. I. Borbhuya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the mem bers of the Panchayat submits that there is no forgery in respect of the signatu res and all of them joined hand in issuing the no confidence motion against the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the aforesaid stand of the learned counsel is not su stainable. Considering the matter in its entirety and upon perusal of the materials on reco rd, I do not find any reason to quash the impugned notice. Accordingly I do not find any merit in the writ petition and it stands rejected.