^ O.A. N0. /2000 BEFORE THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR ^9 i?/^ y^ll^' -Ato...'7?.5..SZ^ Filed today..i..'^-\-0-'ls3J^r RAMMANOHAR DONGSARE, Aged about 56 y-ears S/0 Shri Deepchand Chief Municipal Officer, Tahsil Lormi Distt. Bilaspur Versus 1. Govt. of M.P. through the Secretary Urban Administration & Development Vallabh Bhav.an Bhopal 2. The Collector, Janjgir-Champa (M.P.) •by Shri- -^..^--^-W^ For Regi^lrar, M. P. Si'aie /iA-'n. Tribunal, RAI''UR. Chairman, Nagar Panchyat, Lorml Distt. Jam tii-r M.P. i¥!?jf?^- ^''!^"L~fL~~ Non applicants ORIBIHAL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT 1985 1. PARTICULARS OF THE APPLICANT As detailed above in Cause Title of the application. , 2. PARTICULARS OF THE NON APPLICANTS: As detailed above in the Cause title of the application. PARTICULARS OF ORDERS. AGAINST WHICH ORIGINAL APPLICATION IS MADE : i) Details of impucrned order : -/-a.^73_CLO_Q ^C-22 '*<.^ e> ^7 v "S^'^PIRFI, yi&'y'l'i. faai'M^ StR^T 'VRK . .7^ ^^^^.....^..^.....^..4{/^ •^^sr' 311^1'%I R-li* sbt|l°b 'BIia sii^i'?R[IW :afei <*l<4i<']<B-l 114cif '9 felSt <Fa|«^K i? sipg'q snt^i Sinha call^d When tKe matter was petitioner and ftie inatter was none appears for the petitioner. for hearing, noiie appeared for fhe toassed over. Even in the second round. Shri Arviiid Dubey, Panel Lal Takiag iato consideration •U petition, petition is luiaUy dispij to revive if aav cause of action < Copy offhis onler be sent to ^?ver for ti.ie State. te nature of controversv ruvolved ia tlie ^sed of resen'ing liberft' to the petitioner ptill survives for consideration. i'die petitioner. Sd/- ManmdraMohanShrivastava Judge