IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11627 of 2011 1. Surendra Paswan, son of Dayanand Paswan(Husband). 2. Dayanand Paswan, S/O Late Somar Paswan( Father-in-law). 3. Suma Devi, W/O Dayanand Paswan(Mother-in-law). All R/O Manka, P.S. Akbarpur, District-Nawada………………………………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Bijay Paswan, son of late Nanku Paswan, resident of Village- Bhare, P.S. Fatehpur, District- Gaya………………………………………………………………………..Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 29.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner no.1 being the husband and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed four years prior to the occurrence. There is accusation of demand of motor cycle and chain. There is general accusation against entire family members including the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 and it appears that the brother of the husband and his wife have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr.Misc. No. 39439 of 2010. Since thrust of accusation is 2 against the husband, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.1. Hence his anticipatory bail application is rejected. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 128 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)