(^' HIGH COURT OF THE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case(C) No. 122 of 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR Keshav Prasad Patel, S/o. Shri Nandhari Ram Patel, Aged about 62 years Ex-Terex Operator, Grade-B, Katkona Colliery, S.E.C.L. District Koriya (C.G.) Versus Mr. Kuldeep Prasad, General Manager, S.E.C.L. Baikunthpur Area, District Koriya (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 10 & 120F THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 2150F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Ashok Shukla and Mr. Atnu Ghosh, Advocates for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (10.05.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on admission. Petitioner- Keshav Prasad Patel has filed this petition for initiation of proceeding of contempt against the respondent, General Manager, S.E.C.L., Baikunthpur Area, District Koriya (C.G.) for non-compliance of the order dated 29th of January, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 6314/2000. This Court while deciding the said writ petition by order dated 29th of January, 2010 directed vide Para-11 as under:- "11. In view of the foregoing, it is a fit case wherein the matter should be referred to the Age Determination Committee for determination of ageof the petitioner as aforesaid, having regard to the various provisions of Implementation Instruction No. 76. It is ordered accordingly." v It appears that after passing of the said order, the matter was accordingly referred to the Age Determination Committee which considered the matter in light of the direction issued by this Court i.e. particularly in light of the Implementation Instruction No. 76, and thereafter found that there was no merit for correction of date of birth in case of the petitioner and his date of birth as mentioned in the service records i.e. 26.10.1939 has to be maintained. After Contemot Case (C) 122 of 201 1 vatti receiving report of the Age Determination Committee, General Manager issued a communication dated 3.5.2010 (Annexure-C/2) to the petitioner and clarified the above situation. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any violation of the order dated 29th of January, 2010 passed by this Court. The Contempt Petition, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge