^s^.' "^^ ifS: •1} c-.f^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCGI ^^— M.C.C. N0. ">l 72008 fW.P. N0. 1625 OFO 2005) w^ '^~ o^ '^ ('Arisina outoforderdt. IS.lO^G^bassed in W.P. No/1625/2ah APPLICANT ^;^ t)|(,2-</^ ^^ ^•^^^^ y^"",,,.-^" NON-APPLICANTS ^ik I ^ i' ^j ^^.// ^ £.;1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Panchram Kenwat aged about 56 years, son of Shri Bhagau Ram, resident of village Dunwarpara, Sub Tah. Baradwar, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) ankura, vikas Khand Pithora, Tah and Distt. Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - The The Secretary, Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Collector Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) District Land Acquisition Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) Union of India, through the Ministry of Industries and Mining, New Delhi. Chhattisgarh Mineral Development Corpn Ltd New Shanti Nagar, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur (CG) through its Managing Director. The Managing Director/ M.P. State Mining Corporation Ltd. Paryavaran Bhav/an, Areara Hitls, Bh6/pal (MP) The Naib Tahsildar, Tah. Baradwar, Distt. Janjgir--Champa (CG) s eS ifX. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION N0. 1625 OF 2005 DISMISSED IN DEFAULTON 18.10.2008^- -^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR AppHcant Respondents M. C. C. No. 398 of 2008 Panchram Kenwat .Versus State of Glihattisgarh & otliers APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P. No. 1625/2005 (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri A. N, Bhakta, Advocate for the applicaat, Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Law}^er fbr the respondents No. 1, 2, 3 &7. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent No.7. O RD E R (orall (Passed on tius 14th day ofDecember,-2009) Heard. The appMcant has filed this appUcation for restoration of the Writ Petition No. 1625/2005 ( Panchram Kenwat Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disinissed for waut of prosecution by order dated 18, 10,2008. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents subiaits that ia the facts of the case, they have no objection if the appHcation for condouation ofdelay in fiUng the appUcation for restoration ofthe writ petition is allowed. Having regard to the facts situation, the appUcation dated 27.11.2008 (I.A.NQ. 1) for condonation of delay in filing application for restoration of the writ petition, is ordered, as prayed for, The delay is condoned. Reasonable and sufiicient cause has been shown. The Writ Petition No< 1625/2005 may be restored to the original file, subject to payinent ofcost ofRs. 500/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee, wifhln a period oft\vo weeks. In view of the above the appUcation is disposed of. A copy of this order niay be placed on record in Writ Petition No. 1625/ 2005 and the same niay be listed for hearing. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge m