IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1157 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR Versus RANJITA KUMARI & ORS ----------- 3 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner assails the order dated 4th September, 2009 passed in Maintenance Case No. 155 of 2003 whereby the Family Court has directed for payment of maintenance amount of Rs. 2500/- per month to the applicant for the said case with a litigation cost of Rs. 2000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on perusal of the impugned order and on appreciation of the evidence adduced it would appear that the order cannot be sustained in law. Besides, it is submitted that the application filed under section 125 Cr. P.C. before the Family Court was not maintainable. Having considered the submissions of the parties and on perusal of the impugned order, I do not find any error in the order. The writ application accordingly stands dismissed. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)