IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.307 OF 2008 Dada Subhana Gophane since deceased ) through his legal heirs : ) Sagaji Dada Gophane & Ors )..Appellants Versus Mr.Gotiram Laxman Vadari (Pawar) )..Respondent ---- Deepa S.Matwankar i/by B.M.Purandare for the appellants. Mr.R.M.Hondre i/by P.N.Joshi for respondent nos.1 to 4. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 21.04.2008. PC 1. This is a defendants’ appeal against the decree of possession and injunction in favour of the plaintiff. The decree has been confirmed by the appellate Court. The suit lands were 1H & 98 Ares out of Gut No.765. The plaintiff’s suit which was filed in the year 1992 was filed on the footing that he was the owner of the gut number and defendants had purchased 2 hectors leaving behind his ownership in respect of 1.98 hectors. It appears that in respect of the 2 hectors, suit for specific performance was decreed in favour of the defendants. 7/12 extract was for the year 1993-94 which indicates both the names and the 2 hectors shows against the defendants’ name. In the year 1996-97 : 2 : the name of the defendant is shown as owner. This extract is however, pending the suit. The defendant has not been able to show any documents of title. In my view, as regards possession, there is concurrent finding of facts and hence, there is no substantial question of law involved in the Appeal. Second Appeal is therefore, dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)