IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.8370 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 28, 2011 PARGAT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS GURTEJ SINGH & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Ashu Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. JS Thind, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) In view of the findings recorded by the Superintending Canal Officer that a person would get Wari/turn of water to irrigate his fields, as per Northern India Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, on the basis of first come first serve, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that let the petition be disposed of as not pressed. This is in view of the contention of learned counsel for respondent No.1 that as per site plan (Annexure R-2), the field of the petitioner is getting irrigation from Point 'B'. The field of the petitioner is earlier to the field of respondent No.1. The respondent No.1 is getting turn of water after the petitioner. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as not pressed. March 28, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?