. P. No. ——— Gyxjeet Singh Man, S/o. urudayal Singh Man, aged >about 42 years, R/o. Q. No. l—C/66, Bishrampur, Dist.— Surguja (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS l. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Ministry D.K.Bhawan, Raipur/(C.G.) Officer incharge of Police Station, Ambikapur (Dehat) Dist.—Surguja (C.G.) Officer incharge of Police Station, Civil Line, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Ram singh Manager, National Garrage, GE Road, Raipur 5. Nitant Shah, Director, National Garage, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.) 6. Shashank Shah, Director, NationaliGarage, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.) 2. W ¥¥ £ 7. Anurag Tiwari, Field Officer, Magma Leasing Ltd. Bilaspur (C.G.) 8. Jitendra Bajpai Field Officer, Magma Leasing Ltd. Bilaspur (C.G.) Shri Vishta, Manager Magma Leasing Ltd Bilaspur 10. Ravi Budhia, Director Budhia Motors, (Sub. Dealer of National Garage), Manendragarh Road, Ambikapur, Distt.*Surguja (C. .) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 6/2 7 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i § o5ios[2oos ‘ 1 l I i i i r i Shri J.K. Shas’rri, counsel for the petitioner. § Shri Rajesh Pandey, GAAfcr fhe Stéte. Considering the nature off the pfayer made, the matter is ‘taken up during the vacation arrd‘on the prayer and consent of the learned counsel for the petitLoner and the respondent, then éma’tter is being disposed of at th: admission stage itself: The grievance of the writ I. etition is to the inaction on the ‘part of the Police Authorities in not taking action and carrying the investigation in terms of thcj report :lodged by him at Police / Station Ambikapur (Dehat). Accordingly the limited prayer § I I i } 1 I . ‘ 5 I f ‘ ‘ . ¢ x i i made by the lealned counsel f( r the Lietitioner at the time of 4 I ‘ i hearing is for a direction to bé issued to respondent n02 to investigate the matter and take appropriate action thereafter in accordance with law. In reply learned State counsel submits that necessaiy steps shall he taken in that regain by e4 Investigating OfElcer. ”wMM‘N‘ i d rt ~ i IXIj-Hcaz z E L ‘ Z é J _- L; ‘ ‘ _ ' ‘ ‘ ‘ 3‘ , L 1 In ths hght of the above E‘ , “aidiéposed of w1th a dlrectlon ‘ i i ‘ Eaippropriate' stsps in accordancc ‘ gbyi the penuoner It' 1's t } V .expressmg ally oplmon on _ i . ,ponsequences Will naturally mveshgatlon earned out by the t ’j E 1n v1ew of the above thls ConSequently, M W P No 1473/ 4820/ 2003 for healing I;A.No.4819j 2003 for urgent he; s - lbmjssions, this writ petition is , ' to respondent n62 to take V i with law on the report lodged madtt‘cleai“ fthat the Cburt is ngt _ : I 'he merits of the case and ollow on the hams of the (tuthonttes g . writ petition stands giisposed of. ’003 forf interim reh'ef, g..A.No. ¥ sunlmer vacation and n'ng also stand disposed of. * . ‘~ ‘1 P.C.Naik Sd/- ‘ t i“o Judge I 1 \