IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 5696 of 2009 Petition under Section ____ of CPC., to revise/against the order dated ______ in NO : of 0 on the file of the court of the Between: Mohd. Khaja Moinuddin S/o. Md. Imam Ali Kistapuram Village Sathupally Mandal Khammam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Pattan Rahmath Khan S/o. Madar Khan R/o. Kistapuram Village Sattupally Mandal Khammam District 2 Pattan Abdul Mazeed Khan S/o. Madar Khan R/o. Kistapuram Village Sattupally Mandal Khammam District (RR 2 is not necessary party) .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD MUMTAZ PASHA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.SURENDER RAO The Court made the following : PSR,J. C.R.P.No. 5696 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Admittedly, there is no positive finding by this court that the first respondent herein – Pattan Rahmath Khan is in possession of the property. What all the order passed by this court is only status quo, without any finding as to possession of the property, by any of the parties. Such being the order passed by this court, it is not a case for granting any police aid. Hence, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. In the result, the civil revision petition is allowed. The order impugned herein is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. December 14, 2009. *BVS