I H E HIGH (.OUR'I OF jUDlLA'l URI: AT BILA5P HA1 l‘ISGARH WRIT I’El‘]'l'l()N PLOI (498 #12002 ‘ K.K.NaLh Aged about 60 years‘ S/o Late Shri Kamini Kurnar Nath, Sub Divisionai OfTlCer. E/M FOM Sub Division. W‘R,l)epartment, RnigarlL Chhattisgarh ERSU S ’ I / ape of Chhattisgarh hrough its Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department; DKS Bhawan Mammlaya, Raipur‘ Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Engineer. Hasdeo Bangn \‘v’ater Resources Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Executive Engineer. VVater Resources Department“ Light Machinery Gave Divisinn‘ Bilaspur. Chhatisgarir 4. RG’Jain Sub Engineeri (EEérM & Light Machinery) Divisional ()f'iice. Biiuspur, (’Ihhattisgarh 5. Madhya Pradogh Adminigtrative Tribunal, Bench ‘x‘lipur .g cuRf EEg' 4’ DismctRaipui Ihhmtisgarh. .1 ii J vi CLERKv'tfgc); Ag. trmsrua H UR *‘ x1_Hc.22 3w W, Wm; W sm‘éyi m » I WiWmFwP/Wlqg?a% 2091’, ma 311w W R ‘ m mm—g fgqg Tm 17- 10-2002 ‘ Shn‘ P.Diwaka1‘, counsel for th‘e peu'u'oner. Shri Sanjay K Agalwal, Dy. Advocat€ Ganeral for respondent \Ios. 1 to 3. Shn' Rambir Singh, Govt. Adv, for the respondents No.4. Vide order dt. 30—04—2002 the petitioner Who, at the relevant time, was incharge of the omce of Sub Divisional Omcer, Raigarh was transferred as Sub Divisional O$cer Hasdev E] M] R851? Sub Division, Dani, Korba. This onier was subje‘Lt matter of challenge in O.A, No. 486/2002 before the M.P. Adminis‘mative Tribunal, Raipur Bench, Raipur. The said O.A. was dismissed on l7-7~2002 and that order is subject matter of challenge in this w tit petition. Admittedly, the petitioner is to retire on 31—10-2002. It is his i case that While he was posted at Bilaspur he was directed to join as Sub Divisional Ofhcer, Raigarh in the vacancy caused due to the death of the Sub Divisional Onicer, Raigarh on 03-06-200 1. While he was at Raigarh, the impugned order transferring him to Hasdev 3/ M] R851? Sub Division, Dani, Korl)a was passed. According to the petitioner, since he has just three months of service before superannuationJhe ought not to have been transferred as this, apart [Tie W )/ XLHC-22 méw an faiai mw petitioner hands over the charge pension and post retiral benehts, om causing dimculty in obtaining fwould alsi) cause dislocation aS’after three months he would again be required to m0ve out. The ’I‘ribu. ual hadiniu'ally granted interim pmtccu'on thereaftcr the O.A. was di smissed. When the matter came up i‘Counsel very fairly stated that Sim about Hteen days .the State Govermment will not disturb him and he Bilaspur where he was initially will be permitted to Continue at posted, subject to the condition that he should, within three days, hand over the charge of the o$ce a1 ; Raigarh where he was posted by way of stop gap arrangement. R ecording such submission, the petition is disposed of. According Ly, it is ordered that in case the € .t Raigarh wimin three days, he shall be permitted to join at Bilasl iur, where the Government shall give him a suitable posting. Consequently LA. No.4870/O 2 for urgent hearing also stands disposed of. Certined copy as per rules. Sd/— P.C‘Naik Judge before the Court, learned State :e the petitioner is to retire after -MV , {humimsytninwnuMn “Wm,“ 7