IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1946 of 2009 Date of Decision : 30.11.2009 Partap son of Munshi .....Petitioner versus Karambir and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the petitioner-defendant against whom the ad-interim injunction application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jind, vide order dated 7.9.2007 but on an appeal preferred by the respondent-plaintiffs, the afore-stated order dated 7.9.2007 has been set-aside by the learned Additional District Judge, Jind, vide the impugned order dated. 6.3.2009 and ad-interim injunction granted. While issuing notice of motion, the operation of the impugned order dated 6.3.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jind, was stayed by this Court. C.R. No.1946 of 2009 (O&M) 2 During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiffs informs that the main suit itself is now ripe for arguments and as per his instructions, the arguments have also been concluded. Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the suit and also in view of the above noted stage of the suit, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Court to conclude the hearing and decide the suit on merits as early as possible preferably before 31.12.2009. Till then, operation of the impugned order dated 6.3.2009 shall remain stayed. Disposed of. Dasti. 30-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE