IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15478 of 2009 SURENDRA PRASAD Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Irregularities were found while advancing the loan. In a reality, the loan was advanced only in the name of the beneficiaries but after impersonation, it means that no loan amount was given to the real beneficiaries. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that at the latter stage of the enquiry, petitioner’s name transpired showing his role as person, who collected applications of loan and submitted to the Bank. Thereafter, there was impersonation. According to the learned counsel, petitioner has no concern with that. His role came to an end after submission of the application. Anyway he was benefited by the act of the Bank, none has appeared to state, even then petitioner is apprehending his arrest, which can never be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 274 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)