IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4813 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.R.SHAH ========================================================= 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? --------------------------------------------------------- BHAVESH JAYANTILAL POPAT Versus STATE BANK OF SAURSHTRA --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 4813 of 1994 MR KJ KAKKAD for Petitioner No. 1 MR SB VAKIL for Respondent No. 1-3 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 4 --------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.R.SHAH Date of decision: 22/04/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT The petitioner stamp vendor in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India had prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents No. 1 to 3 to direct the respondent No.2 to accept the amount of challans of the petitioner, if he is found in queue before 2.30 p.m. for purchase of stamp paper etc., and not to refuse amount of challans of the petitioner when he is found in queue by making any other arrangement so that the petitioner can get required stamp papers etc., from the Treasury Office, Rajkot on the same day as per the challans. 2. Today, when the matter is called out Shri Kakkad, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner stated that the petition is of 1994 and the grievance made in the Special Civil Application is related to the incident of 1994. Today, we are in 2004 and due to modernisation the services of the Bank might have been improved leading to change in rendition of services by the Bank and therefore he requests this Court that the petition be disposed of as not pressed at this stage. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present Special Civil Application is disposed of having not pressed. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. rmr. [ M.R. Shah, J. ]