IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34050 of 2009 PAWAN SHARMA SON OF SHAMBHU SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SITANABAD, P.S. BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT. SAHARSA ------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.35243 of 2009 1. SHAMBHU SHARMA 2. BANDHU SHARMA BOTH SONS OF LATE BINDE LAL SHARMA 3. RANJEET SHARMA SON OF SHAMBHU SHARMA ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SITANABAD, P.S. SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT. SAHARSA. ------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 379, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(x) of the S.C./S.T. Act. Taking into consideration the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners and the injury report of Mahendra Paswan reveals that he has sustained simple injuries whereas it has been submitted that with regard to Kamleshwari Paswan, no report has been received from the PMCH and the chargesheet was submitted without the report having been received, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Saharsa, in connection with Simri Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 46 of 2009 (G.R. No. 398 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioners are directed to appear before the Officer-in-Charge, Bakhtiyarpur, for the next six months and the Officer-in-Charge will ensure that the petitioners do not in any manner threatened the informant and if they are found to be doing so, appropriate report will be made by the Magistrate concerned who will thereafter proceed for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse. S. Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)