BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of January Two Thousand Ten PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN CRL OP(MD) No.433 of 2010 1 SARAVANAN [A-2] 2 ADAIKKAPPAN @ ADAIKIKAN [A-3] 3 ALAGU [A-4] 4 RASU [A-5] 5 MANOHARAN [A-6] 6 KAVIRAJAN [A-7] 7 NALLATHAMBI [A-8] 8 RAJA [A-9] 9 ADAIKKAN [A-11] 10 THIYAGU @ THIAGARAJAN [A-1] 11 P.L. RAJENDRAN [A-12] 12 BAGURUDHEEN [A-10] 13 V. SENTHILKUMAR [RANK NOT MENTIONED] 14 BASKARAN [RANK NOT MENTIONED] ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP. ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNAMARAVATHY POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.8 OF 2010 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.R.M.ANBUNITHI GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- Petitioners 1 to 12 are arrayed as A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A 7, A-8, A-9, A-11, A-1, A-12, A-10 and petitioners 13 and 14 are unname accused in Crime No.8 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police Apprehending arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Section 143, 341, 294(b) IPC and Section 7(1)(a) of Criminal Law Amendment Act they seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners woul submit that since the Government properties sought to be alienated i favour of the private parties, they registered their protest and hence they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thi Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in th event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Distric Munsif-cum- Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District and o executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousan only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of th learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that th petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of one week and, thereafter, as and when required fo interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditio stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 4. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrat within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is mad ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stand dismissed. sd/- 20/01/2010 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNAMARAVATHY POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. + 4 CC TO M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ ADVOCATE SR.NO.1637. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.433 of 2010 Date :20/01/2010 2P/9C RPB 21.01.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/