IN THE .HIGH COURT OF MADHYAPRADESH AT JAEALPUR. 6% :e 1994 PETITIONER z P—K: Dubey son of Shrl R.N‘Dubey, MISC .PETI’I‘ION N9 / (“3 ‘2? Vivek Rlcheriya, Sub-Englneer, SADA,Ratanpur,d:Lstr1ct Bllaspur We ; r VVIVVNM P ITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ’INDIA ’ % ‘ Em my “9‘ wig M19331”... Pr ‘ Asstt. Engineer, SPECIAL AREA DEVELOP- mm; Authority; Ratanpur,dlstrlct ‘aY .Aévmk Bllaspur MP. wmww“ “Mama: mm gxx Versus ‘EE%&PONDENTS. H State of Madhya Pradesh,through .WWwW‘HWV I ‘ wgd’m k The Secretary,Housing and ’ " Env1ronment Department M‘Pq .aaoxaAL. Chairmari, Special Area Develyment Authority.Ratanpur, - cum - Collector, Bilaspur MP. m|In|c||Flg|u|yo|mLuyHum *rhe Hunieipal @xmcli. Ratanpi me£ mimiciyal wstri¢t Bilasp ’i’ t“ WU) m ‘rnkgg TEEN Th Ohiwah wag“ v ska %e tanpur . \Q:Go of India ‘ Develop o-f the I hence 11 o£ the 2 a the MJ (here i: u [W ~ n ‘ GH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR LM WRIT PETITION No. 808 of 1994 P.K.Dubey. VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh & Others. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. AgnihotriLJ. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1. Shri Vikram Dixit, Advocate on behalf of Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. I ORAL ORDER (Passed on 02“ day of February, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner r may not be interested in pursuing the matter. \ 2. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner, forthwith. i sw- ‘ -SATISH K.AGMH0TRI ’Judge