-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Contempt Petition No. 131 of 2007 in Writ Petition No. 1671 of 2007 Ram Bahadur Koilal Shrivastav ..Petitioner Vs. 1. Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others ...Respondents Mr.R.A.Yadav for petitioner. Mr.J.G.Aradwad Reddy for respondent no.1. Ms.Shobha Ajithkumar for respondent no.2. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J 22nd October,2007 22nd October,2007 22nd October,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In Writ Petition No.1671 of 2007, Division Bench passed the order on 30th July, 2007 permitting the petitioner to make the representation within two weeks from 30th July, 2007 and directing the Colony Officer, G/South Ward to consider the same within six weeks therefrom. Pursuant to the said order a representation was made and hearing was fixed by the said authority on 23rd August, 2007. Thereupon, he considered all the documents and the oral submissions and passed his order on 29th September, 2007 which has been duly communicated to the petitioner. 2. This Court has not directed that the petitioner -2- would be declared eligible. All that this Court has directed that his claim should be considered. That has admittedly been done. Merely because the order is not favourable to the petitioner, it does not mean he can file the contempt petition. The contempt petition is not a remedy. Remedy of the petitioner is to file substantive proceedings to challenge the order of the authority and raise all the grievances including one that the order of this Court is not implemented in letter and spirit. The contempt petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)