:1: 6.11-rpa bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.6 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1603 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1301 OF 2010 New Akash Ganga CHS Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Rajiv Datta & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Abhishek M. Pungliya for Petitioner. Mr.D.H.Mehta with Bharat Punekar i/b. Yatin R. Shah for Respondent No.1. CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI,J. DATE :- MAY 4, 2011 P.C. 1. The present petition is filed for two purposes. Firstly; according to the petitioner, there is a typographical error in the second line of paragraph No.1 of the order dated 2nd February, 2011 passed in the Civil Application No.1603 of 2010, secondly; for review of the said order dated 2nd February, 2011. 2. In so far as the speaking to the minutes of order is concerned, it appears that in the second line of first paragraph the word “mandatory” has been erroneously transcribed. The same be deleted and replaced with the word “prohibitory”. 3. In so far as the prayer for review is concerned, in the order dated 2nd February, 2011, the Court has given elaborate reasons for passing the order. In that view of the matter, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record to warrant invoking review jurisdiction. The Review Petition, therefore, stands dismissed. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)