IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.231 OF 2005 Shri.Tukaram Laxman Jadhav ...Petitioner Versus Shri Sudhakar Ganpatrao Sambre & Anr...Respondents ...... Mr.M.M.Sathye for Petitioner. Mr.C.T.Chandratra for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 9, 2006. MARCH 9, 2006. MARCH 9, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The grievance in this Petition is that the Respondents who are Talathis, taking advantage of that position, have carried out amendment in the Revenue records. The Petitioner apprehends that on the basis of that amendment, the Petitioner would be now dispossessed inspite of ad-interim stay for delivery of possession granted by this Court on 14th January 1994. Insofar as the change brought : 2 : about in the village record, that cannot be subject matter of contempt, as there is no stay in that behalf. However, as the Respondents through Counsel assure that the Respondents will not precipitate the matter any further and abide by the ad-interim stay for delivery of possession order passed on 14th January 1994, which assurance is accepted, no further directions are required in the present Petition. 3. Petition is disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.