V6rsuS Respondsnts 1, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W'Iit Petition No. 4252 of QOHE Petitioner Smt. S. Dhanalaxmi, W/o S. Mohan Rao, aged about 44 years Assrstant Teacher M VN Rao Niemonal pm Mlddle $ch001 Khursrpai Zone 3 Bhilai District Ding (C G) State of Chhattlsgarh through Secretary Education MVN Rao Memorial pre Middle School Khursrpar Zone 3 Bhilat District Durg (C G) School Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Head Master Department D K S WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22f) 3a 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB, Hqn’ble Shn Satmh R. Agmhotn J.) Shri Anoop Majmndar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No. l. 03‘ Thaku: (Passed on this 24th; day of June, 2009) Heard. Laalned counsel appeanhg for the peh‘tioner submits that in View of the averments made by the respondents in para 3 of the return, filed on 12.9.2008, to the effect that “the main grievance of the petitioner with regard to the benefit of 5‘11 Pay Commission has been nothing survives fo adjudication in this writ petition. Thus, this Writ petition has become infmctuous. Learned counsel appealing for the respondent/State has no objection. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge _,V.v-—”~""‘ J £2 O R D E R goral) reSolved",‘ r