:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3057 OF 2007. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7875 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 7875 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 7875 OF 2007. M/s. Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners. V E R S U S Bharat Petroleum Corp & others. ..Respondents. AND Paramparik Machchhimar Bachao Kruti Bachao Samiti. ..Applicant. --- Mr. Sulip Sen i/b M/s. D. H. Law Associates for the applicants. Mr. A. V. Anturkar i/b Mr. S. B. Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Page for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Rajivkumar i/b M/s. Vyas & Bhalwal for respondent no.3. Mr. Jitendra Pathare i/b Mr. R. V. Govilkar for respondent no.5. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SHINDE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SHINDE, JJ. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SHINDE, JJ. DATE : April 7, 2008. DATE : April 7, 2008. DATE : April 7, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. This is application by a third party, namely, Paramparik Machchhimar Bachao Kruti Samiti, to intervene in this petition. This petition deals with the subject matter of unloading of liquid cargo at the JNPT and the question of permission required for such unloading from any of the Authorities. Mr. Anturkar :2: :2: :2: claims that for unloading the liquid cargo on the jetty, no permission is required even though it is hazardous liquid. He states that for storing such material in CRZ area the permission may be required, however, if the storing is beyond the CRZ area permission is not required. The Interveners are the persons who are affected by the establishment of the JNPT and their grievance is that even though the assurances are given to them to make rehabilitation, the same has not been carried out for them. We find that their grievance does not have any relevance with the present matter. The learned counsel for the Applicant - Intervener states that they are coming here to point out the correct position of law. However, for that purpose the petitioners and respondents are there on record. Not only that, the Authorities who are supposed to take objections and grant permission are also before us. Under these circumstances the presence of the third party is not necessary. In view of this since we find that third party has no locus, neither it is affected or prejudiced as a result of the orders which will be passed in this petition, we refrain to entertain this application. Application is rejected. (S.S.SHINDE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :2008/sss/..