1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2702 OF 2009 (Barikrao s/o Motiram Pawar and anr vs. The State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee, Adv., for the applicants. Mr. P.M.Shinde, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 11/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Counsel. 2. In an offence vide Crime No.87/2009, registered on 30th May, 2009, at Dindrud Police Station, district Beed, for an offence under Sections 420, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of IPC the accused/applicants have requested to enlarge them on bail. 3. The prosecution case indicate that two cheques were forged, rubber stamp of Gram Panchayat was also 2 manipulated/fabricated. Based on such rubber stamp and two cheques, an amount of Rs.7,20,000/- was withdrawn from the Bank by the present accused/applicant through his colleague applicant no.2. The amount, indeed, was deposited in the account of Rohidas Raghunath Pawar, with the same Bank but different branch. I am informed, by order dt.6th July, 2009, application moved by said Rohidas is allowed by this court by directing him to be released on bail of Rs.10,000/-. It is also informed that the amount of Rs. 7,20,000/-, subject of withdrawal, is indeed sealed at the instance of investigator and there is a lock for such withdrawal. 4. The accused applicant no.1 herein was arrested on 16.7.2009. He was in Police custody remand till 23rd July, 2009. The applicant no.2 was arrested on 20th July, 2009 and was in police custody remand till 23rd July, 2009. Now both the applicants are in magisterial 3 custody remand. 5. In the situation, since nothing now is to be recovered from the accused/applicant, the amount which was allegedly siphoned off under false preparation of the documents is safeguarded. The accused applicant herein being permanent resident of village Dhais Tanda, Wadwani, district Beed, further custody is not desired. 6. Hence order: (a) The accused/applicants (1. Barikrao s/o Motiram Pawar and (2) Navnath s/o Achutrao Pawar) be released on their individually furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand). (b) The accused/applicants (1. Barikrao s/o Motiram Pawar and (2) Navnath s/o Achutrao Pawar) shall jointly or severally furnish a solvent security to the tune of Rs.7,20,000/- (Rs. Seven lac, 4 twenty thousand ). On furnishing such solvent security, the orders of bail will come into operation. (b) After release, the accused/applicants shall attend the concerned Police Station whenever so desired, shall not leave jurisdiction of district Beed, for a period of one year. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2702-09crap