IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14007 of 2009 1. YADUNANDAN PANDEY, S/o- Late Ram Janam Pandey. 2. Girija Devi, W/o- Late Raghunandan Pandey, 3. Gunjeshwari Devi, 4. Nandani, 3 & 4 both widows of Late Ram Niwas Pandey. 5. Rakesh Pandey, 6. Rishikesh Pandey, 5 & 6 both sons of Late Ram Niwas Pandey. 7. Jagannath Pandey, S/o- Late Brijnandan Pandey. All residents of Village- Thori Pandeypur, P.O. & P.S.- Murar, District- Buxar. 8. Binda Devi, Daughter of Late Jagdish Pandey, wife of Shri Ram Jee Pandey, Resident of Village- Chainia, P.O. and P.S.- Koransarai, District- Buxar :--- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Joint Director of Consolidation (HQR) Directorate of Consolidation, 4th Floor Co-Operative Land Development, Buddha Marg, Patna :--- Respondent 1st Set 3. Jagnarain Pandey. 4. Lalbabu Pandey, Both Sons of Late Hira Pandey. 5. Kamta Pandey, S/o- Late Shri Niwas Pandey. 6. Most. Kamla Devi, W/o- Late Kashinath Pandey. 7. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Pandey, S/o- Late Kashinath Pandey. 8. Tinku Pandey. 9. Pinku Pandey : both minor sons of Late Kashinath Pandey, Residented through their mother and natural guardian (Respondent no. 6) All residents of Village- Thori Pandeypur, P.O. and P.S.- Murar, Dist- Buxar :-- Respondents 2nd set ===== 03. 29.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. It appears, the revision application of the petitioners has not been entertained by the Joint Director, Consolidation (Headquarter) under orders dated 12.6.2009 passed in Revision Case No. 246 of 2008 (Annexure- 4) on account of the bar created under Section 10 A of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). 3. It is submitted that in the special facts of the case which has been enumerated in paragraph 9 of the writ petition the bar imposed under Section 10A of the Act ought to have been ignored with direction to the - 2 - petitioners to file their objection before the consolidation authorities. The case as set out in paragraph 9 of the writ petition does not appear to have been considered by the Joint Director, Consolidation (Headquarter) while passing the order dated 12.6.2009, Annexure-4. 4. In the circumstances, I direct the Joint Director, Consolidation (Headquarter), who has passed the order dated 12.6.2009 to reconsider the matter in the light of the submissions noted in paragraph 9 of this writ application after notice to the opposite parties and pass fresh orders in accordance with law. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha, J.)