IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6891 of 2009 RAVINDRA PRASAD, son of late Ramdevan Prasad, resident of village – Jamaluddinchak, P.S. Khagaul, District – Patna. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through Secretary, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi. 2. East Central Railway having its office at Hajipur, through General Manager, Hajipur, Vaishali. 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna. 4. The Senior Divisional Engineer, (Co-ord) East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna. 5. The Senior Finance Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna. 6. The Senior Divisional Engineer (3), East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna. 7. The Divisional Engineer (3), East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna. ----------- 04. 17.12.2009 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, with the many facets of dispute emerging from the pleadings of the parties the Court is of the opinion that evidence will have to be led and evaluated and for which right forum would be raising the dispute before an Arbitrator. The Court therefore disposes of the writ application with liberty to the petitioner to raise or demand an arbitration with all the issues raised in the writ. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)