IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2175 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:29.03.2011. Shri J.J.Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Shri Ramesh Sood ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Notice of motion. At this stage, Ms. Hemani Sarin, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/landlord. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he would not press the revision petition on merits, rather he has prayed for granting sometime to vacate the demised premises as the petitioner/tenant, who is 69 years of age and is in possession of it since the year 1976, would find difficulty in finding alternative accommodation for the purpose of running his business. In view of above, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed on merits. However, the petitioner/tenant is granted six months' time from today to vacate the demised premises i.e. on or before 30.09.2011. This order shall operate subject to filing of an undertaking by the petitioner/tenant in this regard before the learned Rent Controller concerned within 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and also on making payment of the entire arrears of rent, if any due, within a period of 4 weeks from today and shall also keep on paying the monthly rent to the respondent/landlord on or before every 10th of each calendar month. It is needless to mention that in case of any violation of the undertaking, which is to be furnished by the petitioner/tenant before the Rent Controller, he would make himself liable for action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. March 29, 2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge