// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.104/1994 With S.B. Cr. Misc. (II) Stay Appl. No.269/1994 {Shayad Ahmed Vs. Khatija Bano} Date of Order :: 7th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri P.R. Choudhary, Counsel for petitioner None present for respondent #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The husband-petitioner preferred this revision petition challenging the impugned order dated 27th January, 1994 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur, whereby the application filed by non-petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C., was allowed and the petitioner was directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.400/- with effect from 30th March, 1992 i.e. the date of application, with costs of Rs.500/-. Although, this revision was admitted but no interim order was passed by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner // 2 // contended that the court below committed an illegality in awarding the amount of maintenance and further that the same was at higher side. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of finding recorded by the court below and, after considering the same, I find that looking to the income of the petitioner the amount of maintenance awarded by the court below appears to be absolutely justified. I do not find any merit in any of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed. Consequent upon dismissal of the revision petition itself, the stay application, filed therewith, does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//