IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2444 of 2005 M/S Technico Steel Industries through its proprietor Nishant Banka, son of Sri Pawan Kumar Banka, Devi Market, Chowk, Patnacity.. …..Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, 2. Finance Controller, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, 3. The Superintending Engineer (Electrical) Bihar State Electricity Board, Shivalaya Market, Patna, 4. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Mittanghat, Patnacity, P.S. Khajekalan, Patnacity. ……..Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate, Mr. Akileshwar Singh, Advocate ………….. 4 15.07.2011 By filing this writ application, the petitioner seeks direction to the respondent authorities to refund or make adjustment of minimum guarantee charge for the period 1996-97 to 1999-2000 as per Industrial Policy introduced by the Government of Bihar. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents wherein a stand has been taken that incentive given in the 1995 Industrial Policy is applicable from 1.9.1995 and not prior to that. However, it has also been stated that the petitioner is required to furnish all relevant document before the General 2 Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, PESU to show his entitlement so that a decision could be taken by the concerned authority deciding as to whether the petitioner is entitled for the incentive flowing from the policy of 1993 or 1995. Petitioner also places reliance upon an order passed by this Court in CWJC No.168 of 2003 (Annexure-2) in identical manner. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner file a detailed representation appending therewith all relevant documents to the General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, PESU within four weeks from today along with a copy of this order. If the same is filed, the authority concerned would consider and decide the matter in view of the representation of the petitioner within six weeks thereafter after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. This disposes of the writ application. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)