IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 404 of 2006 (M/S) Yashvir Singh S/o Sri Tara Chandra, R/o Village Mohammadpur Jatt, Post Office, Gurukul Narsan, Tehsil Roorkee, District Hardwar. ……Petitioner Versus Deputy Registrar Firms Societies and Chits, Uttarachal 8-A, Bangali Mohalla East Canal Road, Dehradun and others. …Respondents. Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Date: July 30, 2008 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 9-3-2006 passed by the respondent No. 1 (Annexure No. 23 to the writ petition) whereby the result of the election of the committee of management was declared. Briefly stated the facts are that the petitioner filed the writ petition No. 110 of 2005 (M/B), Jasvir Singh Vs. Registrars Firms Societies and Chits, Uttaranchal, which was decided by this Court on 25-8-2005 with the direction that the result of the election may be declared and the signature of the Manager of the newly elected Committee of Management shall not be approved till the dispute is decided by Registrar Firms Societies and Chits Uttarakhand within 30 days disposing of all the objections finally. It was also directed that all the points raised in the writ petition shall be considered by the Registrar, Firms Societies and Chits Uttarakhand and if he finds any dispute, then he may refer the dispute under Section 25 to the Prescribed Authority. Further, the question of newly inducted members shall be decided by a reasoned order and if no dispute is found, then Registrar shall refer the mater to D.I.O.S. for approval of signature of newly elected Manager. If the dispute is referred to Prescribed Authority under Section 25 of the Act, then Prescribed Authority shall decide the dispute within two months from the date of receipt of reference. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that as per Section 25 of the Act, the matter was referred by the Registrar Firms Societies and Chits to the Prescribed Authority/ S.D.M. Roorkee. The matter was referred on 21-12-2005 to the Prescribed Authority/S.D.M. Roorkee and the Prescribed Authority finally decided the lis under Section 25 of the Act on 14- 12-2005. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has stated that the order passed by the Prescribed Authority has been assailed by the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 25 of 2006 Yashvir Singh Vs. Sub- Divisional Magistrate and others. The result of the election of the Committee of Management was declared in compliance of the Court’s order passed in writ petition No. 110 of 2005 (M/B), Yashvir Singh Vs. Registrar Firms Societies and Chits Uttaranchal and this order was not challenged by the petitioner in Special Appeal because the order was passed by the consent of the petitioner himself. Since, the order was passed in the said writ petition by the consent of the petitioner himself. Hence, the order for declaration of the result cannot be set aside and further more the petitioner has also assailed the order for declaring the result of the election of the Committee of Management by filing fresh petition. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is hereby dismissed. All pending applications stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma, J.) 30-07-2008 MK