HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Petitioner Respondents Writ Petition fa No. 2920 of 2009 j i Ramesh Agrawal, Environm.ental activis|; aud nieinber "Jan. Chetana", S/o (late) SIiri Jai Narayan Das Agrawal, laged about 55 years, R/o Naya Ganj, Raigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. Versus 1. 1. 2. 3. ThakuT Union of India, through Secretary, Mirustry of Environment & Forests, C.G.O. Coniplex, Lodhi Road, New Dettu. 2. Chhattisgarh Euwu-onTnent Couservation Board, through Member Secretaiy, 1 Tilak Nagar, Shiv Mandir Chowk, Main Road, AvantiVihar, Raipur, C.G. 3. Regional OfiBcer, Ghhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, T.V. Tower Road, Raigarh, C.G. 4. CoUector/ District m.agistrate, District RaigarhC.G. 5. M/s Smghal Energy Pvt. Ud., 201 Madaa Coinplex, Main Road, Shaakar Nagar, Raipur, C.G. through Shri Saajay Agrawat, Director. (Writ Petition under Article 226 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnihotriJ.) Ms Sudha Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri KashifShakeel, Advocate forfhe respondent No. 1. Shri Paxikaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Shri Vivek Sharm.a, Panel Lawyer for fhe respondent No. 4. ORDERJmrall ( Passed on this 27th day ofjuly, 2009) Heard. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, ou iastructions, subiaits fhat the petitioner seeks pemiission of this Court to wifhdraw fhe writ petition on the gTQund on subsequent development i.e. holdu^ ofpublic hearmg. However, Uberty m.ay be granted to the petitioner to iSle a fresh petition, ifja aew cause ofaction arisesor survives. Leamed counsel appeariiig for the respoudents have no objection. The writ petiticai is accordmgfy disiiiissed, as withdrawn with theabove-stated liberty. i ~— ' • Sd/- SatistaK.Agnihptnjl Judge