IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.588 of 2008 BAHADUR PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 19.9.2008 KHAN Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a government employee and working in the office of the Police office itself. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and in an enquiry he has not been found as an accused. He further submits that the petitioner has apprehension that he may be arrested any time. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner should move for anticipatory bail instead of approaching this court in criminal writ jurisdiction. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to move for anticipatory bail before the learned court below. In the meanwhile, the petitioner shall not be arrested for ten days in connection with Munger (Kotwali) P.S.Case No.339 of 2000. (S.P.Singh,J)