IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5501 OF2005 Miss Swarooprani Subramanya Bhatt ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Milind Vasudeo i/b. R. Ravindran, for the Petitioner Mr. R.D. Rane, Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. P.P.Chavan with Ms. Deepa Chavan i/b. Little & Co., for Respondent NO.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ, F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ, F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ, DATE DATE DATE :5th :5th :5th September,2005 P.C. . The petitioner has challenged the assessment of marks and also challenged the vires of the Rules. The Apex Court has held that the Rule does not postulate reassessment. The Board has produced the papers. We have gone through the papers and satisfied ourselves, that all the questions were corrected. The papers were also moderated. Considering that, it is not necessary to go into the vires of the Rules. Hence, petition rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (DR. (DR. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)