HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 4th May, 2009 First Bail Application No. 341 of 2009 Order on the bail application of the accused. 1. Raghuveer Singh S/o Late Chandra Singh 2. Anil Kumar S/o Kamal Narayan …….. Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party Case Crime No. 25 of 2009 U/s 304 and 201 I.P.C. Police Station Pokhari District Chamoli With First Bail Application No. 357 of 2009 Order on the bail application of the accused. Karn Singh S/o Late Surendra Singh …….. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party Case Crime No. 25 of 2009 U/s 304 and 201 I.P.C. Police Station Pokhari District Chamoli Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the accused/applicant Karn Singh; Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the accused/applicants Raghuveer Singh and Anil Kumar; Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State; and perused the record. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; learned counsel for the accused/applicants contended that there is no sufficient evidence against the accused/applicants to involve them with commission of offence and the chain of circumstances is not complete against the accused/applicants; the fact that the statements of Kamal Lal, Sajjan Singh Negi, Sandeep Singh Negi and Pramod recorded on 02/03/2009, 22/03/2009, 22/03/2009 and 24/03/2009 respectively only states that the deceased was lastly in the company of the accused/applicants as per the statement of the witnesses as read over by the learned Addl. G.A.; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused/applicants Raghuveer Singh, Anil Kumar and Karn Singh be released on bail on each executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 04.05.2009 Shiv