1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.987 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.988 OF 2008 M/s Rajesh Industries & Anr. ... Petitioners in both the petitions. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents in both the petitions. Mr. Tejas Bhide i/b Harihar Bhave for the Petitioners. Mr. A.T. Javeri, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. Mr. P.N. Patwardhan for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: A.S. OKA, J. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. 1 It appears that amicable settlement is not possible. The second petitioner has since expired. The result of the order impugned is that appeal against conviction preferred by the petitioners stands dismissed. Hence, Revision Application is maintainable for challenging the said order. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to convert these petitions into criminal revision applications. 3 Amendment be carried within six weeks from today. 2 After amendment is carried out this petition be placed for hearing. If amendment is not carried out, Petitions will stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE