^ <!y c-^.\4/- IN^ E^lH(mC^URT^FJtCT)KMTURE^A^ ^Y/'^CHSUtri^^ '••, : tt^^^'.n GlVII.iaBVISIONNO. /2004 PETITlONER APPLICANT ^^y^. .^^< .>^ RBSPQNDENT NONi-APPtIC^T 'Abdul:Khair (Writtgn as Atednl Khair Khaii in jydgement of lowelr court) |S/ o. MoUd. Ghahi, siged about 48 years, R/o. Mahamaya Roa4, Ainbikapur, P.S. 8s Tahsil-Ambikapur, Occupation T.1. Police - Cham.pa, Disti-ict - Janjgir. At Present - Bharti Nagar, pilaspur VERSUS ! Smt. Rasda Begum, D/o. Uafe Abdul Ghani, W/o. Mr. M.A. Mansoori, aged abput 47 years, R/o. Jarhagarh,'IP.S. & Tahsil - Ambikapur, Distt. iSurguja (C.G.) CIVILREVISIONU/SEC.1150FC.P.C. Si. B B) li;' -ikfe ''iflIH Et' ]li il ii' aaBaaa 1s^itNliIliiiI^^^^ll Biill IKw HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSSARH AT BILASWR CIVIL REVISION N0.153/2004 APPLICANT : AbdulKhair Vereus RESPONDENTS ; Smt. Rasda Begum CIVIt.REVtSIONUNOERSeGTK>N11SOfiG.P.<S. fSinate Bench: Hon'ble Mr.N.K. Aaarwal. J.) Present : StwiSunll Tripattii, counsel forttie applicant. Shri Syed MajidAli, counsel forflon-appjicant ORALORDER (Passed on 14th dayof*lanuary, 2010) This revision is directed against the orter <teted 02-88-2004 passed by Flrst Additlonal District Judge, Ambikapur, (Surguja) in Wsc. ChnlAppealNo.170003 whereby ?nd urtiereunder tKe appetlate Court modified the order passed by Civft Judge, Ctass-t, Ambikapur in Succ^sion Case No.16C001 dated 04-03-2003 and hetd that the daughter of the deceased is entitled fbr 1/6*1' and the son is enffUed for 1/3td share in the movable property i.e. cash, omaments and share certificates left by the deceased, hence this revisfon; 2. Learned counsel for the applirantcoutd not point outany itl^ality in the share allotted by the ^spellate Court. tndisputabty, the pa»ttesare governed by Hanifi branch of Mohammedan Law. As per pereonat lawof the parties, son gets doubie ttie share for Which the daugttter is enttlal for. Here in this case, the deceased teft four daughtare and omson behind him. Therefore.the appellate Court has rigWy altocated Uie ?hareas 1/3 t6 son and 1/^1 to each ofthe daughteps ofthe deceased. 3. In view of above, since»the leamed appellate Court has not committed any jurisdfctional illegality in passing the order, ttie re^sion Iteble to be and is hereby dismissed. r-—^~~^'\ :• sa/- '- N.K.Agrawal Judge ^