M— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pemjnn No. [832; 2mm / pmmomm Hariah Kum Axiim Jaiti Tatha Anusuphit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.). Collector (Adivashi Vikas Shakha}, Jag @ 0 d“ c g“ ar Khurendra dalpur (0.07,); Aesistant Director, Adiln Iaiti Tatha Anusuchi’c Iati Vikas Wbhag, Cullectorate Bmldmg JagdaipmiEaster) (CG). “226 2 7 OF THE E OF A WET m THE CERTIORARI ETC.OR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE. CONSTITUTIDN QF INDIA FOR {SSUANC NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AN? MATTER, OTHER DIRECTION ‘ OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IE THE Details of the petition. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONER :Rs per sause title. Jg‘ A Sf a Shri Kriahna Ram Elurendra, @x fw‘.‘ aged abaut 39 years, working as ab Aesmiant Teacher at Hlgher [V \ $1; ' g I Z \9 , (n%‘7 ; $econda1‘y Schoal, Orcha, / Rio Village- Munjal Gandi, Pegt $6 4.. “ Chaxmak Kanker Q9'59 Q‘ b ‘Diatrict— (Utta: Easter J (ca) —versus— RESPQNDENm ; 1. State of Chham'sgaxh, Through the Secretary Adim Jaiti Tatha Anusuchit Jan‘ Vikas Vibhag, Manualaya, Raipm XI—HC-ZZ \3\ 1N, smarter W‘Gfaa WWW&’I‘MTWR $WW Wmatm A 29-7-2004 Shri Prashant Jaiswal, {Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Prashant Mishra, Addl. Adv. General with Shri Sudhir Agrawal. Panel Lawye: for £he state. Heard on LA. No. 4322/[20'04 for exemption from finng the typed ccpy of the oo ts. Application ls allcwed The petltioner is exampted £xom filing typed copy of the d cuments. Heard. Counsel ior the petiti er submts that the matter 1s exactly simllar to that ot .P. No. 1465/2004; He prays for similar ordexg Counsel :Eor the petiti er submits that. earlier transfer order was passed as per ure P-l dated 30-6-2003 ané his name appeared at Sr. No. 3 . It is stated that transfer order has not been cancelle . Once a person as transferred and his transfer is not can elleda there 1s no JustJilcation in keeping him in earlier ace. It .Vis submitted that because of Lok Sabha electi ns and‘ Vidhan Sabha elections, he was not relieved and no the election are over. therefore. he may be reliev d. He relied on a decision in case of Bir Balrang Kumar state of Biha‘r and others reported in A’IR m 1987 S 1345 to contend that in mm th cases dnvolving identical q“ stions‘, similar order should be passed to avoid possibility of contradictory judgements in same ease» Having considered the f cts and circumstances of the case and material on recor it is directed that if the transfer order has not been cancelled then he be relieved within a period/of threewe ks from the date of production \of certified copy of this o der» ._ ‘ ‘K [View c ‘ n x - e d, The petition is accordingly disposed of. In View of the above o der. the “.W.P, Nod 1636f2004 an‘d LA. No. 4321/2004 a1s Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge stand disposed 9f. Certified copy as per ulesw—w” \y/ 1% w XI—HC—22 3a:mmE%E m¥@;%aK§? xké) 311%? m Wm.2.9...:.‘.P.“;°...2...l§§2l.2°04 m m Tam? 311%?! am Efé‘v! aqrzwr ma?w mmw&wmm$ xa mgx $ 31W“ am ‘