IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34589 of 2011(W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SMT.RATNAMMA.C, SREENARAYANA BHAVAN, ALUMMOODU P.O., MUKHATHALA VILLAGE, KUREEPALLY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM - 691 001. 2. G.KARTHIKEYAN, S/O.GOPALAN ACHARY, MALIYIL KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU, AKKAL BHAGAM, PANMANA, EDAPPALLYKOTTA P.O, CHAVARA, KOLLAM - 691 583. R1 BY ADV.SRI.MUHAMMED SHAH, GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG WP(C).No. 34589 of 2011(W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.978/1980 DATED 22.03.80 OF THE SANKARAMANGALAM S.R.O. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30.12.2008 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.02.2009. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 14.11.2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE DG ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34589/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Alleging non compliance of Ext.P3, petitioner filed Ext.P4 under Section 147 Cr.P.C before the first respondent. In this writ petition what is sought for is a direction to the first respondent to expeditiously conclude the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4. In the nature of the relief that is sought for, I do not think it necessary to issue notice or hear the second respondent. 2. Having regard to the facts as stated above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent to conclude the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 in accordance with law, with notice to the second respondent also. This the first respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the contentions raised. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs