In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5185 of 2009(O&M) Date of Decision:September 10, 2009 Baaz Singh --Petitioner versus Jaswinder Singh and others ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA *** Present: Mr.Padam Jain,Advocate, for the petitioner *** SABINA J. Petitioner – Baaz Singh has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 17.8.2009 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Sultanpur Lodhi. Baaz Singh -plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from taking forcible possession of the land in dispute or interfering in any manner in his peaceful possession. The said civil suit No. 110 was instituted on 1.5.2009. Jaswinder Singh, Balwinder Singh and Ranjit Singh filed Civil Suit No. 124 of 22.5.2009 restraining Joginder Singh, Baaz Singh, Sukhchain Singh, Nirmal Singh and Dalip Singh-defendants from interfering in their peaceful possession regarding the same property in dispute. The petitioner moved an application under Civil Revision No. 5185 of 2009(O&M) -2- Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code in the suit filed by Jaswinder Singh and others that proceedings in the said suit be stayed. Vide the impugned order, application for stay of suit has been dismissed by the trial court. Hence, the present revision petition. Both Baaz Singh and Jaswinder Singh and others have filed to suits for permanent injunction qua the same property claiming themselves to be in possession of the suit property. Learned trial court had rightly dismissed the application moved for stay of the proceedings in the suit filed by Jaswinder Singh and others as both the suits can go on simultaneously. The proceedings in the later suit are not liable to be stayed as in both the suits plaintiffs have claimed themselves to be in possession of the suit property and have sought permanent injunction against the defendants from interfering in their peaceful possession in their respective suits. The trial court had rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioner. Parties, if so advised can move the trial court for clubbing of the suits so that they can be decided together. Accordingly, no interference is called for. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE September 10, 2009 PARAMJIT