IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10969 of 2008. Decided on: 21 st December, 2010. Sanjay Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H. P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4 and 6. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 5. : Ms. Kamlesh Shandil, Advocate Vice Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Kamlesh Shandil, learned vice counsel for respondent No. 5 submits that the petitioner had already been issued appointment letter. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 21, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.