1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1803 of 1981 The Bombay Film Labo.Pvt.Ltd .. Plff versus The Union of India .. Deft Mr. R.C.Shah with Mr A.B.Nagvekar i/b Solomon & Co for Plff None for Deft CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 30th June, 2005 : 30th June, 2005 : 30th June, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The defendant has not filed the written statement for a period of 24 years. Learned counsel for the planitiff does not press the prayers (b) and (d). Remaining claims are money claims. In the circumstances, suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clauses (a) (c) and (e). 2 D.G.KARNIK, J