HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT – NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 113(S/B) 2003 Prem Singh S/o Sri Darshan Singh, R/o village Simalth, P.O. Chipalghat, District Pauri Garhwal. ….Petitioner. Vs. Additional Director, Animal Husbandry Department, (Uttaranchal) Gopeshwar, Chamoli, And two others. ….Respondents. Sri G.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.: Heard Sri G.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel who has accepted notices on behalf of the respondents. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the termination order dated 30.06.1999 passed by the respondent no.2, further with a prayer for a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to restore the services of the petitioner as Class IV employee in the Department. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought by him through writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 20.09.2001 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition no. 1647 (S/S) 2001 Sukhdev Prasad and two others vs. Additional Director, Animal Husbandry Department (Uttaranchal) Gopeshwar, Chamoli, as such, the present writ petition may be decided in terms and observations made4 by this Court on 20.09.2001 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition no. 1647 (S/S) 2001 Sukhdev Prasad and two others vs. Additional Director, Animal Husbandry Department (Uttaranchal) Gopeshwar, Chamoli. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent has raised no objection at this Stage. 2 Considering this, the present writ petition is allowed in terms of judgment and order dated 20.09.2001 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition no. 1647 (S/S) 2001 Sukhdev Prasad and two others vs. Additional Director, Animal Husbandry Department (Uttaranchal) Gopeshwar, Chamoli. (M.M.Ghildiyal, J.) July 13, 2004: NCM: