A L < rt'y BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (C) N0."'?'^ ^ / 2011 PETITIONER ^?^ .;J.--:<^F-" ,....-" ^^^-^^ .-s^ wW'" ^-<e'\ _..-•'" ^a&"" RESPONDENTS Mahabir Mittal, S/o. Shri Satyanarayan Mittal, Aged about 55 ^^ years, R/o. Patthalgoani"Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Depariiment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) '^// :S T ^'^. _. _ ....^ ^ __._.__ *-^"" 1 /RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA NINCTI t6*(Ttb 'S'ST ^ww^, BDly'Ko, [°«'iiyg< ..^..Q.^..^.^ 200 SV^i VI h-»* WI 3IWI *HI* Deepii 3i]^IV ('yi^^) iww ^ifta sii^t SB: Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohdn Shrivastava. J 02-12-2011 Shri Saurabh Dangi and Ms\ Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Deputy ] Govemment Advocate for the StaU '»i<ii?i«iliinsif ^ fezt <Fai*<;i< ^sifaiisn^i Bulbul Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Advocate General aiong with Shri Arun Sao, Learned counsel for the pari|es submit that an order has been passed in the ideniicai cases arising from the ^ame area and on account of simitar notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Lailurtia, Raigarh. Not disputed. Accordingly, this writ petitijan is also disposed off on the same terms. However, the Nagar Panchayat w(ll not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the pere^n concemed. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorizec) or unauthorized structure, as the same is in dispute, before passing the orde)', after considering the cases of the persons concerned. Mahindra Mohan Shr'vastava (irei'ftiiMi^TCsi, K 8 i?3 HB Bl -f.S/140—f/2011—I.SU.UttO. 4.