IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.653 of 2009 Date of decision: May 11, 2009. Sarif Mohmmad ...Petitioner(s) v. State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri S.P. Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ravi Dutt Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Shri Sidharath Batra, Advocate for respondent(s) No.2 & 3. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - (Oral): The petitioner seeks a mandamus to respondents No.2 & 3 to issue allotment letter in his favour in respect of plot no.348 Sector 27, Panchkula. The petitioner has been allotted the said plot under the ousteees quota. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, the respondents have filed their counter affidavit, which is taken on record. It is revealed from the pleadings that land comprising Khasra/Khatauni No.359/420 was owned by Gaffar s/o Dasondha, namely, the petitioner's father, whereas the land comprising Khewat/Khatauni No.376/499 was jointly owned by the petitioner and his three brothers, namely, Mangat Ram, Nazir Hussain and Akbar Mohammad. Plot No.348, Sector 27, Panchkula has been allotted under the oustees policy in lieu of acquisition of Khewat/ Khatauni No.376/499 only. The petitioner has already produced the no objection certificate/affidavits of his three brothers to the effect that they have no objection if the allotment letter of the plot is issued in favour of the petitioner alone. The respondents though do not have any serious objection against issuance of the allotment letter in favour of the petitioner, however, it is their case that the petitioner might have been allotted another plot in lieu of the acquired land comprising Khewat/Khatauni No.359/420 which was owned by his father, Gaffar. The petitioner, on the other hand, has already filed an affidavit to the effect that no plot in lieu of the acquired land owned by his father has been allotted. The petitioner's case is that no plot has ever been allotted to his father or to him under the oustees policy except the plot in question for which he has already submitted the no objection certificates from his three brothers. In this view of the matter, however, subject to the verification, if any by the respondents to ascertain the petitioner's entitlement, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the allotment letter in respect of plot no.348, Sector 27, Panchkula be issued in favour of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Dasti. May 11, 2009. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge