IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7074 of 2011 Ajeet Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar -------- 06/ 06.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and admittedly, marriage of the petitioner had taken place on 29.5.2010 in a temple but subsequently, the informant as well as other family members were not allowed to meet with the deceased on account of non- fulfillment of illegal demand of dowry. It is alleged that in the night of 18.6.2010 informant got a message from one Parmeshwar Mahto that his daughter had been killed by her in-laws and the dead body had already been disposed off. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that marriage had taken place in a temple. So, question of demand of dowry does not arise. It is also contended by him that information regarding death of the deceased was properly given to the informant and after giving information, dead body of the deceased was cremated. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case no. 124/2010 is, hereby, rejected, at least, at this stage. It appears from perusal of the prayer portion that case of 2 the petitioner is still pending in the court of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur whereas the petitioner is in jail custody since 22.7.2010. Accordingly, the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur is hereby, directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of Sessions in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt of this order and after commitment, the trial court shall take all possible steps to conclude the trial of petitioner as early as possible. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)