1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR 1. S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLI NO.4082/2010 Lakhan Singh Vs. State 2. S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLI NO.5262/2010 Kalua @ Man Singh Vs. State Date of order : 28/7/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri D.G. Chaturvedi) Shri Rajneesh Gupta on behalf of Shri Shri Kant Meena )for the petitioners. Shri G.S. Rathore, P.P. for the State. ****** It is a serious matter in which the petitioners while supplying copy of the challan papers to the learned PP, did not accompany therewith copy of 58 pages containing call details between the accused persons. The Court took a serious view of the matter for this lacuna and on that basis summoned the I.O. to explain as to why he did not conduct the investigation in correct direction. I find that in both the bail applications although challan papers have been filed, but the call details were withheld. Not only the challan papers were filed in the bail applications, but they were also supplied to learned PP. In the common practice that is adopted by the Court when challan papers are supplied by learned counsel for the petitioner to learned PP and also to this Court, it is not considered necessary to either summon the case diary or challan papers as the matter proceeds on the basis of mutual faith. 2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Consequently, the bail application of the accused petitioners stands dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/