IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5489 of 2007 Date of decision: 21st October, 2008 M/s Sukh Dayal Tilak Raj … Petitioner Versus Murari Lal … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Arun Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Duvanshu Jain, Advocate for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondent – landlord states that the petitioner – tenant has vacated the premises and has delivered the peaceful vacant possession to the landlord. Mr.Arun Jain accepts the statement made by the Counsel for the respondent. In view of the statement made by the respondent – landlord, present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE October 21, 2008. rps