IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21760 of 2010 GAURISHANKAR JHA @ DINKAR JEE, S/o Late Kameshwar Jha. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 28.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 353, 324, 326, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Considering that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report in the present case for which two officials and five villagers lost their life, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge in case it is done the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered. At the time of renewal of his prayer for bail the petitioner shall specifically state that he is not an accused in four cases mentioned in the criminal antecedents forwarded by the S.P. East Champaran in the present application and has been remanded in the seven cases which have been mentioned. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)