IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 5190 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 31st March, 2010. Kamini Roy Petitioners through Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate. Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Notice of motion. Mrs. Charu Tuli, learned Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice. Keeping in view the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to ask the respondents to file counter-affidavit. The petitioner is aggrieved at the impugned orders dated 23.03.2008 [Annexure P-1] whereby the benefit of three increments granted to her w.e.f. the date of acquiring the qualification of Giani/Prabhakar has been ordered to be withdrawn. The petitioner also seeks a Mandamus to direct the respondents to release the pension and other pensionary benefits to her on the basis of the actual pay drawn by her till retirement. So far as recovery is concerned, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy is squarely answered in favour of the petitioner by a Full Bench decision of this Court in Budh Ram v State of Haryana & Ors. 2009[3] PLR, 511. Consequently, the recovery order is hereby quashed. Recovery, if any, effected from the petitioner, shall be refunded within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Adverting to the claim of the petitioner that she is to be granted the pensionary benefits on the basis of the actual pay drawn by her till retirement, this Court vide order dated 02.03.2010 passed in CWP No. 16323 of 2008 [Smt. Sudarshana Devi & Anr. V State of Punjab & Ors.] has constituted an Officers' Committee to look into such like claims which essentially require verification of the individual facts. The writ petition qua the afore-stated relief, is accordingly disposed of by relegating the petitioner before the Officers' Committee, who shall consider the afore-stated claim in accordance with the Rules/Government instructions and keeping in view the facts of individual case and shall make appropriate recommendations after hearing the petitioner in person. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Till the Committee takes any decision, the petitioner shall continue to draw her retiral benefits as per the reduced/re-fixed pay. Disposed of. Dasti. March 31, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE