IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5111 of 2006 SHEO NATH PRASAD SON OF LATE RAM JEEVAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIBIGANJ MAIDA TOLI BHATHA, P.O. DANAPUR CANTT., P.S. DANAPUR, DISTRICT PATNA. … … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEE’S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SERPENTINE ROAD, R. BLOCK, PATNA, BIHAR. 2. THE ASSISANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEE’S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, PATNA, BIHAR. … … RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 14.2.2011. Today again, on call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. However, Mr. Rajeev Verma, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna is present. In this case, a counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of the respondents. It was submitted by Mr. Verma, learned Senior Counsel, that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. In this case, on 11.2.2011 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner whereas learned counsel for the respondents was present. The petition stands rejected due to non prosecution. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)