// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4130/2008 Harish Kumar Meghani S/o Shri Vadhu Mal Meghani Versus Jaipur Nagar Nigam and Others Date of Order ::: 09.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Dinesh Kala, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction in the trial court against the defendant Jaipur Nagar Nigam and in that suit the applicant-respondent No.3 Ramesh Kumar filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead as party in the suit. The trial court, after considering the submissions of the parties, allowed the application and directed to implead the applicant as defendant No.3 in the suit. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and also the reasons assigned by the trial court in the impugned order for allowing the application of the applicant-respondent No.3 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and, after considering the same, I do not // 2 // find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error so as to interfere in the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//