IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2065 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2065 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 2065 OF 2006 Shri Amarnath G. Sharma ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 6 ors. ] .. Respondents Ms. Prachi Tatke i/b V.A. Sugdare for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 23RD APRIL, 2007 P.C. : . The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the grievance of the petitioner will stand redressed if the representation made through a Notice given through Advocate Ranjit A. Thorat dated 21st March, 2006, which is at Exhibit-C at page 37 is directed to be decided by the respondent No.2-Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The grievance is that the said representation is not being disposed of on its own merit by the respondents. 2. We, therefore, direct the respondent No.2 that the representation dated 21st March, 2006, made through : 2 : Advocate Ranjit A. Thorat which is at Exhibit-C to this Petition at page 37 be disposed of on its own merit by passing a speaking order, after giving hearing to the petitioner within a period of 8 weeks from today, if it is already not disposed of. If the said representation is already disposed of by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, the copy of the said order shall be furnished to the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [R.S. MOHITE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]