1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4679 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2004 Tanaji Shamrao Nalavade & ors. Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Shekhar Ingawale for the applicants. Mrs.V.R. Bhonsale, A.P.P. for the respondent. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & R. S. MOHITE,JJ. DATED : 11th January 2005 P.C. Heard Mr.Shekhar Ingawale, the learned counsel for the accused-applicants and perused the judgment of the learned IInd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur. 2. There is direct evidence of P.W.12-Babaso Gurav implicating the accused-applicants of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of I.P.C. The evidence of P.W. 12 is corroborated by medical evidence. At this stage, therefore, it cannot be said that the conviction of the accused-applicants is based on no evidence. The accused-applicants were also not on bail during trial. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that no case 2 for grant of bail to the accused-applicants is made out. 3. Criminal application is, accordingly, rejected. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.S. (R.S. (R.S. MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.)