In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5058 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 04, 2009 Hukam Chand .. Petitioner Vs. Kaka Ram and others .. Respondents Civil Revision No.5059 of 2009 Rajinder Kumar and another .. Petitioners Vs. Hukam Chand and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. G.S. Punia, Advocate with Ms. Gurveen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner (s). A.N. Jindal, J This order of mine shall dispose of two revision petitions No.5058 and 5059 of 2009, one filed by Hukam Chand and the other by Rajinder Kumar and Jaswinder Kumar sons of Purni Devi daughter of Jeona Ram. They have claimed that since there is a dispute between the parties with regard to succession of Jeona Ram and they being the legal heirs of Jeona are necessary parties to be impleaded in the suit, but the trial court for no reasons dismissed their application. At the very outset, learned counsel for Hukam Chand as well as Rajinder Kumar and Jaswinder Kumar have fairly conceded that neither the petitioners would file written statement nor want to lead evidence. However, they may be allowed to join the suit from the stage as it is pending. I have also been informed that the suit is now pending for arguments. Civil Revision No. 5058 of 2009 & Civil Revision No.5059 of 2009 -2- Under these circumstances, it would be expedient in the interest of justice and to avoid dismissal of the suit on the technical ground of non joinder of necessary parties, the petitioners Rajinder Kumar and Jaswinder Kumar are allowed to be impleaded as party from the stage of the suit as it exists today. Trial court is directed to make necessary corrections in the memo of parties and they be allowed to argue the case. These petitions are disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this court for recalling this order. September 04, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge