IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 263 OF 2006 M/S AL-NAFEES FROZEN FOOD EXPORTS ....Petitioner PVT.LTD., NEW DELHI. Versus GOA MEAT COMPLEX LTD.,THROUGH ITS ....Respondent MANAGING DIRECTOR, PANJIM GOA. Mr. Yogesh Nadkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Rakhi Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- V.C. DAGA, J. Date:- 3rd August, 2006 P.C. On the motion made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, he is allowed to withraw this petition, with liberty to challenge the impugned order, if at all the petitioner is required to challenge final award in future. Needless to mention that all rival contentions are kept open and that the participation of the petitioner in the arbitration proceedings will be without prejudice to its rights to challenge the impugned order and shall not constitute waiver on its part. V.C. DAGA, J. ssm.