IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15571 of 2009 1. REENA KUMARI W/O RAJESH KUMAR, R/O VILL- GADRINA, POST- MOTIPUR, P.S-KARJAIN BAZAR, DISTT- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, RAGHOUPUR, DISTT- SUPAUL 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BIRPUR, DISTT- SUPAUL 5. THE MUKHIYA MOTIPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, POLICE STATION, KARJAIN BAZAR, DISTT- SUPAUL 6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT MOTIPUR, P.S- RAGHOPUR, DISTT- SUPAUL 7. DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, SUPAUL ----------- 2. 14.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 27.8.2009 terminating her services as Anganbari Sevika, issued by the District Magistrate, on the alleged ground that on the date of inspection i.e. 13.3.2009 she was found absent as reported by the Sub-divisional Officer. Learned counsel relies upon a report of the C.D.P.O. dated 3.8.2009 to submit that on the date concerned she had gone to appear at the Intermediate examination with the approval of the authority. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the disposal of this matter with appropriate directions to the District Magistrate to take a fresh decision in accordance with law dealing adequately with the report of the C.D.P.O. dated 3.8.2009 also. The order dated 27.8.2009 is, accordingly, set aside only for that limited purpose and shall not result in automatic reinstatement of the petitioner, which shall necessarily depend upon fresh appropriate decision by the District Magistrate. 2 Let the same be done within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)