IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH APPEAL SUIT NO.2058 OF 1995 Between : Samudrala Bala Pandurangaiah ...APPELLANT A N D State Bank of India …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH APPEAL SUIT NO.2058 OF 1995 ORDER: This Appeal Suit, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 04.09.1995 in O.S. No.33 of 1987, whereunder and whereby, the suit filed for recovery of money, was decreed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. 3. The appellants are defendants and respondent is the plaintiff in the Original Suit. Originally O.S.No.33 of 1987 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Markapur, was filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money against the appellants herein. The said suit was decreed in favour of the respondent. 4. Today the matter is listed under the caption “for withdrawal”. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants filed a letter dated 09.03.2010, issued by Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Markapur, in which it was stated as follows: “To whomsoever it may concern. “ This is to certify that Sri Samudrala Bala Pandu Rangaiah Prop of Santhi Niketan Slate Works Auca Account No.11013517445 paid a sum of Rs.90,000/- as full and final settlement of the above said loan account under compromise settlement and closed on 09.03.2010” 6. In view of the same, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that since the matter is settled out of Court by paying the entire amount to the Bank towards full and final settlement of loan amount, therefore, the appeal may be closed. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal suit is dismissed as withdraw. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH SEPTEMBER 21, 2010. YVL