ST' l $-; IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P.fCI NQj3/^ /200? PETITIONER .of\^ 4^* Q>\£ 0^ ^ T£)./~ <•'•• . .. ^<'y. VA°:''\ ..•'"" ^^y '^.-- <?<8F",&.-"' RESPONDENTS Pawan Kumar Agrawal Managing Director Mohan Jute Mills Limited Raigarh (C.G.) & Raigarh Properties Private Limited, Raigarh (C.G.) Acting Through: Subhasis Mallick S/o. Late Shri D.P. Mallick The Personnel Officer of Mohan Jute Limited Raigarh (C.G.) As constituted iawful attorney Mohan Jute Mills Staff Colony Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS -?-1. State of Chhattisgarh Through -Coflector of Stamps Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Shri P.M. Rakhecha Executive Director Raigarh Jute and Textile Mills Limited, 36 Chowranghee Road, Calcuta 700071 (W.B.) 3. Board of Revenue Through : The Presiding Member Board of Revenue, Bilaspur (C.G.) &>1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN QFINDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BltASPUR Writ Petltion (0 No. 131S of 2Q07 Petitioner Pawan KumarAgrawal Vereus Respondents SB: Hon'bte Shri SatiBh K.AanUietei. J. Present: Mr.RaghawndraPradhan.counselforthepetittoneiF. Ms.SunitaJaln,Panellawywfertheresp<MadentsNo. 1 and3. ORDER (Passedon this 8th day ofMarch, 2007) 1. By thls peBUon, filed-under Arficte 227 (rfthe GonsBtutlon af Indla, th» prtttonw chaltenges Ihe wilidity o( tbe im^igned order dated 9.11.2006 (P/1), passed by the Board of Revenua, BitepurteAppeal hto. 13/SA./B- 106/^2006, whereundw thea|i|Beal><itad faytiiap^Bsnerwas rqedad onthe ground ofctelay. 2; Tt»p^ittoner wtth the memo of appeal fited beftire the Boaid ofRewnue, Bitaspur for condonaUon of delay tn ffllng fte appesrtff^, wherem he has statwtas under:- "2. That the appeal is (adualty barrad by the BmitaB<m dtie te justiflabto ground. That, theorderdatel 27.9^05 wsBdispatehed by the respondent Nb. 1 on datad 29.1150% Whlch was Tecesve by the appellant after a week of Ihe cUspatehed dato and ffie respondent No. 1 fawan Kumar ^rawal MWE®U^|Dlreclor o( Mohan Jute MiBs Ltd. was unter compkte ba* re^ during^^^^ perk>d of time on nrtuc*i the order was passed, dispateh«land stW he has not yet completefy rasovered as he has under gone byflass su^gery of heart but as soon as he fBlt litHe l^ter health condiBOT he appolnted Shri Sutasish Mallick, Personnel OBteer as 9 attom^ to deal witti th®case on dated 02.032006 rtKolleoNaand ttie attomey toft Kolkotta on thevery nertd^e en (toted 03.03^X16 and reachad Bilaaptn' on dated 04.CQ.2006? Mtt'the counsel on 04.03^006 WBning and atler discussion in the casa, pnpared tt» case on CB.03.2006 by appQinBng the counsel. Hene»^tf»delay. The copy of the medicat ceifificates to this regsud areannexed <s Ann®(ureA-3" 3. The respondents, in their reply, trave not rontrovertBd the reasons given by tte petitioner for condonatlon <rf delay, excef* the bafcl ^steinent ttBrt the delay may not be condoned. fcwnis fyittor ^rted that eertBiesrtB was notananged date-wiset 4. I have heard leamed counsel apf»aringfor Sie paittte and gonB ttroygb the pteadlngs bdore the Board of Rewenue. 1 am of tt»<»»iskterect opinion thsrt tha peUttoner tias sutoniBsd resBorabto anrf satfelwtiwy reasons for condonaUon of ctelay, brt fce Board of Rewnw hes not conshtored the feets in preper contort. Thus, Uw (mpug»»denter dated 9.11^)W (P/1), ps ^d t^ Bie Board QS Revenue, Bteepur is sel sakte. The matter is renaitted back to the Board ofRevenue, Bitespur fordfeposat on merit. 5. ThewritpetiUonisaccordir^ilyaltowed. Noorda'astBcosts^ 6. Consequentty, M.(W.)P. No.87»20)E7,^inds dlsproed A Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judge