IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16100 of 2008 Chandra Kishore Yadav, Son of Sonay Yadav, resident of Village- Barerwa, Police Station- Triveniganj, District-Supaul --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Narayan Sah, Son of Late Dukhan Sah, resident of Village- Jagur, Police Station-Triveniganj, District-Supaul --- Opp.Parties. ----------- 03 28-06-2010 Today again when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. On 25.06.2010 when the case was called out, none had appeared. However, the case was adjourned for a day with an indication that no further adjournment shall be granted. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of the order dated 14.1.2008 passed in Cr.Rev.No.168 of 2007 by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Supaul . By the said order. the learned Fast Track Court has rejected the revision petition preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 12.6.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Triveniganj P.S. Case No.130 of 2006, registered under Sections 447,379,504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In Triveniganj P.S. Case No.130 of 2006, the police after investigation had submitted final form. However, the learned Magistrate by its order dated 12.6.2007, while accepting the final form, ordered to proceed with 2 the complaint case, which was instituted on the basis of protest petition. I have perused the order of the revisional court. The revisional court has examined the materials available on record and assigning a detailed reason has rejected the revision petition, which was preferred against the order dated 12.6.2007. I have perused both the orders, i.e. 12.06.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and order dated 14.01.2008 passed by the revisional Court. I do not find any merit in the present petition nor I am inclined to entertain the present petition filed in the garb of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which amounts to second revision and the same is barred under Section 397(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J )