1% IN THE Hi.GH COUPT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN:GALORF... bATED THIS THE 5Th DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR,JUSTINE A,J. SADASHIVA WRIT PETITION No. 6225/1995 /1 BETWEEN. Kantakshi Asnna(Adult) w/o Vamana Shenoy, Nalkedatettu, Hitte Village, Karkala Tq., D.K., rep by her Power of Attorney Holder N.Keshav Shenoy, s/o Varaana Shenoy, Nalkedabettu, Nitte Village, Karkala Tq.,D.K., since deceased by her L.Rs:— I. Neenakshi, aged about SO yrs., w/o Nagesh Kink. 2. Canesh Shenoy, aged abcut 43 yrs., s/o Late Vamana Shenoy, 3. N..Nadhava Shenoy, aged about 41 yrs., s/o Late Vaman.a Shenoy. (I 4. N. Gopai. a< 1.The.n*oy, aged about 38 yrs., sb Late Varnana uhe.noy. 13.2.1998. 5. N.Kesha.va SheiFioy, aged about 35 yrs., s/o Late Vantana Shenoy. 6. N.Ananda Slenoy, aged about 30 yrs., s/o Late Vanian.a Shenoy. All are r/o Nalke.dabettu in Hitte Village, Karkala Tg., Post Nitte., Udupi Eist., ... Petitioners iBy Sri V.V.Upadhyaya, AND: i. Th State of Karnataka rep by the Deputy Commissioner, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, DK 2, The Land Acuisition 0 fficer & the Asst, Commissioner, Kundanura Division, Kundapura, 3 The Asst,Executive Engineer, No.3 Sub—Division, Public Works Department, Karkala, D,K, . Respondents (By Sr. K,H,Jaqadish, GA) This Writ Petition file•••d under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, prayIng to declare the acquisition proceedings as inv?:.:lid and quash ths demand for possession of the schedule lands as. disclosed under notice dt 22.2,95 and 25,2.95 at Annex—F & H. and etc., This Writ Petition coming on fhr final disposal this day, the Court made the following ORDE P The petitioner has filed this. petition under Articles 226 of the onstitution of India to declare the acquisision proceedinas relating to her land measuring 25 cents in 256/4c as invalid and to cash the notices dated February 22, 1995 and February 25, 1995 per innexures—F & H respectively by the Asst Executive Engineer—respondent No.3, 3 le Tht çetitnner app’aar to ‘ave traertaken construction in Sy.Nc.2’F of Ntta Viii. or lbnicl i’et. cc Ivbb r ‘oirdf c tnt ion of PacubieraeKottigerara Road. In view of ,,Eze -nie t of coi’truc bra y the pet tlcin r, rd •apcrJey ts ednt” 6 1 XeP era H recua’ng hr tc stop the construction 3 tsr ii hoic, rig t at a j or ruct’na bail rig ra ri dy St t l aci art dri on I r failure necessary action -acui be. token te demolish te we her nsc. grivtab ti sa notce e p itS ir e flied us patS ion fr t raliafa rrer.t. or:e3 in •Ie Li rst peragrah of thés der 3. This petitior :r libi tc. bt c.ir. ed aor want. cf j..ar’ictazs in re ard ‘0 t”t ac ..i’itior 4 . ‘1 ta it a. r 4 t a s regarda the dat aria n’rttr of not afiction unCer hirh “-r cc s a tca to avr t en a’juir u. ‘0 t 1 44 . tot tx test t secure the -artict.:dr of ac-Tu:sitbon —.coceedin;s. Ntavcarzaaerirda Sty dt h4vebe ma to rn at tic at ula of he c.iu tao 4 In th absence of partscu±ars of acquisition by its notification date anA numbeL and the purpose for which the land was acquirec, the petitioner cannot mainair this petition for want of cause of action. Tb’s ttition is, therefore, liable to be tismised for want of farta(ulars rlating to te caue of ection and tie re 1 ief to b granted. 3. in th recult, this petition fails and accordingly dismissed, Rule discharged, leaving liberty to the petitioner to initiate such proceedings as permissibl in law to get her right pro ected in resrect )f sc’udul oroporty if she has any. 5, in the circumstances of the rase, thRre is no oroar as to cst, 6. ri K. .J gno t, tn tnued CGl. : roitted to iil ono o app rnc ‘ tun our wek Sd! JUDGE ckl/698 4