1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION A.O.NO. 1300/2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1593/2008 Sakib Constructions and Ors. Appellants Vs. Miten Shah and Ors. Respondents Mr.V.R.Tripathi i/b Mr.M.J.Shetty for the appellants Mr.S.H.Khan,party in person for the respondents CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 16th December,2008 P.C. 1] The only grievance is that a proper notice of the application in respect whereof the order passed was not given. It is stated that there was no obstruction to the order dated 16th October,2008 . I will presume this to be so although I am not quite convinced . I am not convinced in view of the interpretation sought to be placed on order dated 16th October,2008 to the effect that the access to the room on the ground floor was only for the purpose of intercom facility. The sentence in paragraph 3 is clear.The petitioner was directed to allow the members of the society to operate the intercom facility and to access the room on the ground floor where the society's office is situated. Even assuming that there was any bonafide misapprehension on the part of the petitioner the same is now clarified. The access to the room shall be provided in addition to the intercom facility . 2 2] Thus,even assuming that the impugned order ought not to have been passed by the trial Court the order dated 16th October,2008 shall be implemented as clarified. 3] A.O.is disposed of accordingly. 4] Civil Application is also disposed of accordingly.