J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUOICATURE AT BILAS,PUR (C.G.) PETCT.tOIIERS. </-'d^ ^T ^f.f ^y y^<yf ^ty^: <-• -<<° -•• <^-' Writ Petitlon No. ^'7 of 2003. i (1) Lal Sai son of late Shri Hari Bhajan, aged about 45 years, resident of village Maheshpur (Gadhi Tikara) Tah. Surajpur, Distt. SurgLlja (C.G.). (2) Ilandu son or late &hri Sukhal aged about 60 years. (3) Bal Sai son of late Shri SuKh Rara, aged about 70 years. (4) Hel Sai. son of Mohar Sai, aged about 65 years. (5) Suna son of shrl Shiv Bhajan, aged abo'-lt 65 years. petitioner No.2 to 5 are resident or village .'isheshpur, (Gadhi TiKara), Tah.SuraJpur, -Olstt. Eurguja (C.G.5. V E R S U S RtiSPGNDEN'X'; ^ ./' •^^" „;. n A .(1) State of Chhatfcisgarll 'il-irougn : Eecretary, Forest Deoartment, D.X.S.Bhawan Ra-Lpur (C.G.). (2) State of Madhya Pradesh Through : The Secretary, Forest Department, Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). (3) Chief Conservator of Porest, (Development) , Madliya Pradesh Bhopal (M.P.). (4) Chief conservator or Forest (Development), Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.). —ii 1 ^; (5) Conservator or Forest, Surguja, J^mbi^apur (C.G.). (6) Divisional Forest ©fficer, South Surguja D-Lvlsion, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (-C.G. ) (7) Range Orficer, Surajpur Range, Distt. SLirguja (C.G.). (8) Gollector, Surguja Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.y.). (9) Kuraar Sal son of Shrinath, aged about 30 years, Sarpanch of village. Maheshpur, Tah. Surajpur, Distt. SurgLija (C.G. ) . (lO)Manager son of Govardnan, 'aged about 45 years, resident of village Maheshpur, Tah. Surajpur, -Distt. Surguja (C.G.). (11)Dalpat son of Kalam Kanwar.'Tah. Surajpur, D-Lstt. Surguja (C.G.). ViRIT PETIT-ION UND2R ARTICLS 226/227 Qp TKE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT, MMIQAMUS , DIRECTION. . .ETC i;i'-i. 'i •:i: 7..;'% Lal Sai & Others State of Chhattisaam & Others PETITION UNDER ART!CLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF iNDIA A^iS? ivIr. Satlsh K. Shri V.K.Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Shashank Thakur, Pane! Lav/yer for the S1 (Passed on 30th day of September, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appeBring for the petitioner submits that when the petltion was fiied, there was no scheme for rehabilitat'on of forest iand oustees. Since, the neiw scheme under the Scheduied Tribes and other Tradltlonal Forest Dweliers (Recognition of Forest Right) Act, 2006 has come, wherein it has been provlded to conslder ths cases of forest land oustees for rehabiiitation, the petitioner seeks permtssion of t'nis Court to withdraw thls petition 'A'ith iiberty to take recourse of appropriate forum under the provisions of iaw. 2. Learned counsei appearing for other side has no objection. 3. AccordlnaSv, the writ petition is dismissed wsth the above stated ,Sd/.. 1 K; Judge iiDenv. ishck