IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9337 of 2009 MANJU KUMARI, WIFE OF SHRI SHEO CHANDRA RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KERAWAN, P.S. ISHUAPUR, DISTRICT CHAPRA, SARAN---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SARAN DIVISION AT CHAPRA. 3. THE DY. DIRECTOR WELFARE, SARAN DIVISION, CHAPRA. 4. THE COLLECTOR OF SARAN, CHAPRA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ISHUAPUR BLOCK, SARAN, CHAPRA. 6. THE BAL VIKASH PARIYOJANA PADADHAKARI, ISHUAPUR, BLOCK SARAN CHAPRA. 7. SMT. JYOTI WIFE OF RABINDRA KUMAR ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KERAWAN, P.S. KERAWAN, P.S. ISHUAPUR, DISTRICT SARAN, CHAPRA---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was appointed as Anganwari Sewika at Centre No.7 of Kerawan Panchayat within Ishuapur Block in the District of Saran. There was complaint against her appointment which was entertained by the learned Divisional Commissioner, Saran in his Janta Darbar, whereafter matter was enquired into by the Deputy Director, Welfare, Saran Division who submitted his report bearing letter No. 41 dated 19.2.2009, Annexure-9 to the Collector, Saran at Chapra and in the light of the report of the Deputy Director, Welfare appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled by the Collector, Saran under order bearing Memo No. 207 dated 19.3.2009, Annexure- 8. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the Commissioner, Saran Division nor the Collector, Saran have ever heard the petitioner and the order cancelling the appointment of the petitioner dated 19.3.2009, Annexure-8 is absolutely without jurisdiction and should be set aside as violative of the principles of - 2 - natural justice. 4. I was inclined to accept the submission but instead of entertaining the writ petition myself, I deem it expedient to direct the petitioner to file representation before the Commissioner, Saran Division indicating in details as to how her appointment was rightly made and the report of the Deputy Director, Welfare is factually incorrect as the same is contrary to the mapping position. The Commissioner, Saran Division shall be obliged to consider the matter in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation. Any appointment made in the meanwhile on the post from which petitioner has been removed shall be subject to the result of the representation of the petitioner. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)