IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13924 of 2011 Upendra Prasad S/O Shri Brijnandan Yadav R/O Vill.- Hawanpura, P.O.- Bhandari, P.S.- Rahui, Distt.- Nalanda Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary Department Of Food Civil Supply, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary Rural Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Commissioner, Magadh Commissionary, Patna 5. The District Officer-Cum-District Magistrate District - Nalanda At Biharsharif 6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nalanda At Biharsharif 7. The Director, District Rural Development Authority, Nalanda At Biharsharif 8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biharshariff, Nalanda 9. The Block Development Officer, Rahui, Anchal- Rahui, Distt.- Nalanda ---------------------------------- 2 14.09.2011. The petitioner, who is the licensee under the 1984 Unification Order as well as under the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 prays for quashing the memo no. 883 dated 8.6.2011, issued by the Block Development Officer, Rahui, directing him to refund Rs. 32,84,003/- the value of 2341.9 quintals undistributed rice under Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojana at APL rate of Rs.13.70/- per kilogram. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The 2 aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner submits that he has been asked to return huge amount in a short time. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern this writ application as well. This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 15% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10/- per kilogram or the rice itself in present form within four weeks, if already not deposited. This order would not come in the way of petitioner and other dealers similarly placed, if they want to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20 %. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)