IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11309 of 2009 LUTAN RAJAK s/o late Ram Kishun Rajak , resident of village Sankarwar Tola,Bari Durga Ashtan P.S.- Mokama, District-Patna. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary Urban Development Depatment,Govt. of Biohar,Patna. 2. Nagar Parishad, Mokama, Patna through Special Officer, Mokama Nagar Parishad, P.S. Mokama, District-Patna. 3. The Executive Officer – cum – Authority Incharge, Mokama Nagar Parishad, P.S. Mokama, District-Patna. 4. The Accountant, Nagar Parishad Mokama, P.S. Mokama,District-Patna. ----------- 2 7.9.09 Learned counsel for Nagar Parishad, Mokama appears and states that the petitioner retired on 31st August, 2009 and his retiral dues are being worked out and would be paid very soon. In my view, apparently there being no dispute, being raised by the respondent. There is no difficulty in disposing of this writ petition with a direction that the total pre retirement and post retirement dues of the petitioner would be calculated by the respondent- Nagar Parishad, Mokama and paid to the petitioner in full within three months from today along with payment details of the accounts and head under which payments are being made must also be disclosed.The Executive Officer of Nagar Parishad would ensure the same. The writ petition stands disposed of. Needless to say that if the petitioner has to furnish any paper or document, the Executive Officer has to intimate the petitioner in writing immediately in this regard, so that there is no delay in compliance of the order. singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J)