IC-78 ^^q-qiyirt«,Ui-CTl<«<10, fqwi-dy ^^.c^^s-^0'7^ *11*1rtl ^TTqi •--•—••••—••—-•••-• ^200 3ii^?T<ratp (ijciijci^) an^STipTR'ii* aanan^STiCTiip ?;?aT8R^Tf^t3IT^9T PETITIONER Surendra Kumarl Versus RKSPONDBNTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Kumar Dhruw, son of late Rishl Dhruw, aysd about 47 years, Emplo^ed as Assistant Grade III, O/o Execut^ve Engjnee^, MRP, Etem Division No. 2, Ru^ri, Residing at Irrigation Colony, Sanka^a, Distt. Dhamtari (CG) Statt Seci) D.I Thel K.IS Dep^rtment Rait|ur SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA 26-11-20( AdvocAte Shri B.P. Rao, Sushri Sunita Jain, With consent of the petition is heard finally. Leamed counsel for present, the petitioner <biyIri''i1-1*11tldTItfsl<3 '(RlWK iRarf^Tan^?! of Chhattis^rh, through the itary, Water Resources Department, i. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipiir (CG) Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources irtment, SihawaBhawan, CivU Lines, Chief Engmeer, Water Resources icnt, Mahanadl Project, Raipur The] Dep^ (CG)[ The] Executive Engneer, M.R.P. Dam Divi^ion No. 2, Water Resources Dep^rtment, Rudri (CG) WRIT PETITION UNtfrat ARTICa-E 226/227 OP THB CONSTllTUTIONOFBtDIA ;, for the petitioner. Ifanel Lawyer, for the State. |leamed counsel for the parties, fhe m$y fhe petitioner submits that for fhe be glven an opportuirity of filing C-78 ^^ ^EET ^i<iirt<<, y-(Tl'M<is, Rrti'<iy'< - U5-P.G-0 Mo.^^0^/0^ WlcST^Tff^ ....................................^200 311^91 CRcp (ljc|(jc|cg) 3lI^?T<RTR-li* ;?WT3n^?TsFqtER ^- ^RTTWHfelsn^ST aAd li|berty detafled representation bei): leamed coiinsel for fhe St4t Having considered the merit of the case, in| justice wfll be served if make a detailed represent^tion competent authority of th|E this petition and order, and on such representatio^i of fhe respondents may accordance wifh law, as period of three montfas representation. The petition is dispos^ wittun d^cide elarly chl'i|fri41-111*1dl'^'lsld '<(ul'«l'( ^ari^Tsn^sT 3re the coiiqwtent authority, to which te has no objecdon. without expressmg any opirdon on the opinion of tbis Court, ends of is granted to the petitioner to raising his gievances before fhe respondents aloiig wifh a copy of a period of one month flnm today ^i beuag filed, the competent authority fhe same on its own merit, in as possible, prefer^bly within a from the date of receipt of the ^d of accordingfy. Judge