Criminal Misc.No. M- 28876 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No. M- 28876 of 2010 Date of decision:- 25.10.2010 Sarwan and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M. Anand, Addl. A.G. Haryana. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.252 dated 5.8.2010, under Sections 323,452,386,387,506,148,149 and120-B IPC and under Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Safidon, District Jind. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 30.9.2010, passed the following order:- “ Contends that petitioner No.1 and complainant were depot holders in the same block Safidon and that one complaint was made by petitioner no.1 against the complainant, which was enquired into by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Safidon, who gave report Annexure P1 against the complainant. Further contends that complainant was having grudge against petitioners and hence, this false FIR has been lodged against them. Criminal Misc.No. M- 28876 of 2010 -2- Further contends that complainant is involved in 18 other cases. Further contends that it is a case of no injury and that no recovery is also to be effected from the petitioners. Notice of motion for 25.10.2010. However, petitioners are directed to join the investigation and in case they are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have joined the investigation in pursuance of the said order. It has been stated by learned counsel for the respondent- State that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 30.9.2010, granting interim bail to the petitioners-Sarwan, Parvesh and Mukesh, is, hereby made absolute subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. October 25, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE