1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2833 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5381 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.2835 to 2850 OF 2008 CA 2833/08 IN WP 5381/08 : Latabai Shamrao Markad & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2835/08 IN WP 5378/08 : Madhukar Vishram Alhat & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2836/08 IN WP 5379/08 : Sikhdev Budha Badade & Anr. ... Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2837/08 IN WP 5048/08 : Nashik Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Karmachari Sanghatana, CITU & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik 2 Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2838/08 IN WP 5380/08 : Namdeo Trimbak Mandalik & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2839/08 IN WP 5045/08 : Govind Nivruti Shring & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2840/08 IN WP 5047/08 : Nashik Mahanagarpalika Kamgar Karmachari Sanghatana, CITU & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2841/08 IN WP 5049/08 : Shantaram Narayan Sabale & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2842/08 IN WP 5050/08 : Ambadas Ramchandra Vidhate & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... 3 CA 2843/08 IN WP 5259/08 : Dinkar Baburao Bhangare & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2844/08 IN WP 5382/08 : Sugandhbai Narayan Waghmare & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2845/08 IN WP 5377/08 : Barku Pitambar Patil & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2846/08 IN WP 5041/08 : Balu Madhavrao Wagh & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2847/08 IN WP 5042/08 : Mandabai DagduShertate & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2848/08 IN WP 5043/08 : Madhav Anant Nagarkar & Anr. ...Applicants. 4 Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2849/08 IN WP 5044/08 : Nana Pandharinath Thete & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... CA 2850/08 IN WP 5040/08 : Sadashiv Eknath Jadhav & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The Commissioner, Nasik Municipal Corporation. ...Respondent. .... Ms.Seema Sarnaik for the Applicants. Mr. M.L. Patil for the Petitioner in W.Ps. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 10, 2008. P.C. The order of the Industrial Court was stayed by a Learned Single Judge of this Court when the petitions were admitted. Though in the Civil Applications, wider reliefs have been sought, which by the very nature, cannot be granted at this stage, having regard to the fact that by the interim order, the judgment of the Industrial Court has been stayed, at the hearing the the Civil Applications, only a limited 5 prayer has been sought. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants has submitted that it is likely that the Nasik Municipal Corporation may advertise fresh posts and, in the event that this is done and the applicants apply for the posts, their applications may be considered in accordance with law. Without conceding that the Municipal Corporation is likely to advertise any posts in the future, Learned Counsel for the Corporation states, should an advertisement be issued in the future, and any of the applicants apply for the posts so advertised, their applications should be considered objectively and strictly in accordance with law. In view of the statement made on behalf of the Municipal Corporation, no further reliefs have been sought in the Civil Applications which are accordingly disposed of. It is clarified that this order shall not be construed as a mandatory direction to the Municipal Corporation to issue orders of appointment.