HIGHCOURTOFGI-U-iArrtSG^RHiCTfflU^PUR W. P. (S) No. 13&9 of 2007 Petilioner : Kumari BhushantiBilunge, O/oShri S. Bilunga, aged about41 years, R/o Firangipara, Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) Respondents Versus :1. StateofChhsrttisgarh, Through Secretary, EdiKSrtton Departmerrt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Direcfan' of PuMic Instructton, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. JusUce Satish K. Agnlhotri. Mr. Kumaresh Thwari, Advocate for ttie Petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govl. Advocats for toe responctents/Stete. ORDER (Passed on this 12 day of March, 2007) The peUtioner Is working as Upper Ohrislon Teaeher in the govemment school. In the course oS her services as Upper Dwiston Teacher, the petitioner has obtainal B.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses in the year 1%?0-91 (P/3). Leamed counsel appearing for the pefifloner submite that the quesBon involved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Eiamination CertificatB on her own expenses, is entiUed to twoadvance increments. According to leamed counsel fw the prtitioner, the peBttoner is enUded to tiw advance increments in view of the decisron of ttiis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {20W (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtamed B. Ed. /B.T.I. ExaminaUon Certificate on thehr own eigienses, are covered by the T V. •, cireular dsrted 24.1258 (Annexure P/7) issa^t by the State Govemment ofMadh^Pradesh. Learned counsel for the peBUoner furttwr sutmiNs that the iacts and question <rf Isw involved in the (»esent case are squarely cevered toy decision of this Couft in the ease of Yashwant Kumar Kia-adw^ Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which tesmed counsel appearing for the respondents fiairty cwicedes and agrees vwth the averment made by leamed counsel appearin&for flie petitioner. Accordingly, the wrtt petition is atl<med in tem»ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Nlunicipal Corporafion, Durg and anofter (Supra), subject to verificaUon of tte fact as to whether Vhe petiUoner has acquired B. Ed. Examinaton CertifiGats on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and furttier whether she has been paid two advance incren»ntsor not. No oreler as tocosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge