IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42452 of 2010 1. MD. MAJLIS, SON OF MD. NATHUNJI 2. MD. SAMSO, SON OF MD. WASIR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 376(2)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were refused bail by an order dated 13.8.2010 vide Cr. Misc. 22493 of 2010 with liberty to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge in case the trial was not bifurcated. Considering that now charges have been framed against all the accused persons, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II, Begusarai, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 965 of 2010 arising out of Cheria Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 7 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the mother/father/brother of the petitioners. The 2 bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)