1^'^ IVi ? -? ttOTOR VEHICLES ACT. 1988 APPEL.i,A?\iT/: .(Insurer) National Insurance Company Ltd., Throu9h its Assistant Manager, B-l, Taha Compiex, 2nd Floor, Rin9 Road No.2, Priyadarshirii Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. - Versus- RESPONOENTS/: /(Driver) (Owner) r^ •03'. ^- ^ cA^ ^i.y '/ f^y '^ ^ f ^? / ^ ^o?.f / (Claimants) \^y ^ 3 ^w^ .* hu ' . 'a v 4 V 5. Alimuddin, S/o Rabu! Sansari, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. A.S.©eet,5/oP.s.6eet, R/o Sector-08, Bhi!ai, t5istrict: Durg, Chhattisgarh. Smt. Sasitade'/i Aahire, Widow of Late Lakshya Kumar, Aged about 32 years, Caste: Satnami. Ravikant Aahire, S/o Late Lakshya Kumar, Aged about 17 years, Caste: Satnami. Kurn. Sarita Aahire, D/o Late Lakshya Kumar, Aged about 15 years, Caste: Satnami. . . Respondents/claimonts No.4 & 5 are minors, they are represented through their mother Smt. Sasitadevi Aahire, respondent/ciaimant No.3. TBBi:' G Respondents/claiinants No.3 to 5, all residents of Village: Bhathri, Tikripara, Police Station: Takhatpur, Tehsll: Mungeli, bistrict: Bilaspur. Presently residersts of Bhartiya Nagar Shanti, Nikunj Nagar, Behirrd Nigam Colony, Bilaspur, District; Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. v^"^ E— HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQAKH ATBILASPUR MISCELLANEGUS APPEAL N0. 1287 OF 2004 APPBLLANT/' lusuTer : NaLioiial Iiisuraiiee Couipaiiy Ltd. versus Alunuddia and ofhers. APPEAL UNDES SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE»ACT, 1988 Dlvision Bench: Hon Die Shri I.M. Quddusi 85 Hon'ble Shri G. Minh&iuddin, JJ. Preseat; Slii'i Goutam Khetrapal wifh Sliri Avuiash Chand Sahu, counsel for fhe appeUant. None for respondents No. 1& 2 tliougli served through paper publication. Shri Keshav Dewangan, counsel for claimants/Respondents No.3 to 5. ORALGRD@£ (Passed on 3rd dayofAugust, 2011) Per I.M. Quddusi, •J. -t. The owner was serveu fhrough paper pubUcation and no one appears on behaif of him aiid fherefore, we proceed ex-parte agaiiist hku. 2. Tliis appeal has been filed against fhe Impugned award dated 27-11-2004 passed by tlie Eighfli Aduitional Motor Accldeiit Claims Triburial (F.T.C.), Bilaspur (for short tlle Tribmialj m Claim Case No.05/2004 by uie appellant/Iasurance Company, in so far as it relates to fastenliig fhe UabUity to pay CQmpensation upon it. 3. Brief faLCts of fhe case are that responderits No. 3 to 5 are wtfe aiiu rauior cliudren of fhe deceased Lakshya Kumar, respectlvely. The deceased was workuig as constable m thc police department. On 12-06-2002, wliule gouig to-liis home after' coicipleting liis duty, the deceased ^;^^^^"-';.-f>;"ss"^;~'B:'.L^;;^3^^^^^^^^s=%^'^*i^'i!'T5fi J—^-i- -„- •.^•'- •uop.BgusdttToo Aed o^ siqBTj ppq uagq sAisn lou pThoo ./CTTBduioo soi.rejnsui w^ 'yjspToo^ jo a-^ep gq} TJO 30U31SpC3 LCT ;COT{od OU SBM a,r3qi 3oiT[s '8e6T '13V 33trejnsi.Tt 3W J" SA-t'9 UOTP3S JO UOTSTAOjd 3tp JO M3TA TU •^ , •^tTappo^jo s^Bp aqi ajojsq Lpnui psnaoi.reo XpB3.j[e S^A -fonod grp. sv AreeTmoQ aoirejnsTTi ST.P Aq Abr[od aip 8iing:jo uoTtsanb OOT^SBA a-raT.p. 'ajojajsqj, •g-ON 'VN lusronoop SB p^yj uasq osie aA^q -jsu^]: si:{i jo s^draogj ipisod svj^ 'fsod pajaiSTggj -^q SOOS-EO-i-0 uo .ja^jBajSTp pTTB S005-IO-SS uo Aonod jo uorirenaoTreo aqi joj yjas uoperoTT.m gqi pSAOJd prre jQ'Swey^ tpTTejg 3T.ri SBA oqA (l-^,VN) 'R3PI3 tTT-{Op T.Xrg ss3i.nTdi siy paonpard SBq AjBdTOco 3orrejn8ui/T.treir[9cTdB aip ^eq^ punoj uggq saq IT 'TBunoj-Jj, sroreio sip jo pjoos-i ax.^ jo -[esnjad uo '9 •pajnouoT.TSTp SBM mnTnJsjd 9Tp joj sntoTp gip s^ luappoBjo sifBp sip ajojsq ps^soTreo 8RA &3T]Ol3 3lp 1^1-^1 SBM [eunqpj, snrreio arp ajojaq ATediiioo aouejnsTji/iT.reiiad'dB sqi jo •B9{d az{jL •-<oi[od JO SUOTlTpUOO J.O qOBSjq SBA 3J3q} JST^aqA U33S 9q ^OUTJBQ II Tpng sv. pw pain svai 30ue..m.si.TT jo /fonod aip. jo Adoo ou 5BTR punojg sqi uo syjeinrep grp. cn uop.Bsusdtaoo Aad 01 3{q^n ppq uasq s^q ATredrooo aoT-re-m.sui/y.reYl3ddv 'G •spaaq snoT-.reA japTin -/T88'I8'OS"sa jo uoTiBsuaditroo IB'I.O-J. lUTTirrep TBunoj-Jj, STIITOTO gip Qjojaq (iiov £>T-R» voqs joj) ^3V S3pn.pA wv>Vi 3T-n jo 99T uortoag japtm uoiiTiacT 'e paiQ: paq 'paseaoap ai.njo sjraq ^gai §UT9q s^uemTep aqj, '47 •(?[0njj,) 9pTq9A 8UTpU9JJO aqi.jo J3AUp STp ISIiregB p3J3lSTg3J S^M- Odl 3^P JO t'OS UOpOSg JSpT.m S3U3JJO ire 'iusppoB 3T_T} o^ pjegaj TJJ -^ods aqi. uo payp aq zpn^A jo imsaj v se i[onjj, aqj. jo jsAup sr.R jp gi.nATJp yjySySsu prre qs%j 01 snp 'S'OM yjspTjodssj sqi. .<q pauMO OT 90/0 -2,0 "O'O "ON UOpBJ^STgsj gurjRSq ?[3n-jj, .'Cq paqsBp SBA 8. Haviag regard to the facts aiid clrciimstanees of the case, we ai'e of the opiruon fhat the appeal is Uable to be aUowed aad the same is hereby allowed. 9. The pai~t . of Uie award by wliich fhe appeUant/InsLU'aace Company has been held liable to pay compensatlon is set aside aiid tiie appellaat/Insuraiice Company is exonerated from its liability to pay compensation. However, it wiU be open for the clalaiaiits to recover the amount of compensation from fhe owner of fhe vehicle. 10. Tlie ainouiit wliich has ali'eady been deposited by fi'ie appeUaiit/Insui~aiice Company shall be rcfunded to it. 11. No order as to costs. Sd/- [.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- G,Minhajuddin Judge K-;