IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 256 OF 2007 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3558 OF 2006 Danjibhai N. Babaria .. Plaintiff V/s Balkrishna Sonu Manjalkar & Anr. .. Defendants Mr.Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiff None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J, VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 17TH JULY 2008 P.C.: 1. This suit is filed on the basis of a Bill of Exchange drawn by Defendant No.1 and accepted by Defendant No.2. The execution of the Bill of Exchange and the acceptance thereof is not denied. There was no reply to the Plaintiff’s advocate’s notice demanding payment. In the affidavit in reply, it is contended that the Defendants signed the Bill of Exchange on a misrepresentation that the document was to be used as a reference to obtain a visa for the Plaintiff’s son. There is nothing to substantiate this defence. In fact, two similar suits have been decreed. Further, after filing of the suit, a cheque has been issued for payment of Rs.80,000/- which has - 2 - not been honoured. 2. There is no defence in the suit. 3. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgment is made absolute and the suit is decreed as prayed. Refund as per rules. 4. The original documents are taken on record and marked "A" collectively.