1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2045/2009. : : Subhash Chand & Anr. Vs. Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur & Ors. : : Date of Order 29.4.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. B. P. Sharma for the petitioner. 1. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with the prayer that Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur be directed to decide application filed by petitioner filed before that Commission under Section 26 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, in an appeal filed against the order of State Commissioner Redressal Forum. The Tribunal has vide its order dated 4.1.2008 deferred decision of such application observing that the same shall be dealt with at the time of filing appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the Tribunal has not passed any order on the 2 application of petitioner, neither the appeal nor the revision petition would be maintainable before National Commission for Consumer Redressal, therefore, writ petition is the only remedy. 3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no extraordinary reason to entertain the writ petition particularly when appeal has not yet been decided by State Commission. If and when appeal is decided, the petitioner would have remedy of filing revision petition against such order before the National Commission. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed as being misconceived. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.46.