IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 80 of 2005 Braj Kishore Singh …Petitioner. Versus Union of India and others …Respondents. Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Kumar Sah, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite strenuous efforts for about more than two years, the petitioner has not contacted the learned counsel inspite of communications in this behalf having been addressed to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would have no objection if the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 2. Dismissed as not pressed. Avneet (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 6.4.2010