C-78 *11*1CTI JSW g!5cT-i|l«lri^,t»Tntl<ts7R«l'«S'' ,^K2./^.;..^C(^ 3T[^?TV (l^p^) ^200 sn^CTtpi R-ii<t> ?rai3ii%?isi)*( STOTm-HRd3IT^»T PETITIONER G.D. Pr^ Mohan I District vt ^sad, Aged about 44 years, S/o Shri prasad, R/o Village Kargi Road, Kota, ^lilaspur [CGy RESPONDENTS 1. StateofC Through Departme 2. Joirit Labour Seci|etary, 3. 4. Deputy Departme 5. Assistant 6. Chief Ele^ Block, 7. Election Ashoka Rd Writ Petitron under Article S.B Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mlishra, J. 10.11.2008 Mr. Parag Kotecha, couns^l Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. AG fc| The petitioner, who is ^ transferred from Bilaspur to (Annexure P/7). The pedtioner lagainst the above ti-ansfer order Ivide interim order dated 7.10.: |was disposed ofvideorder dated [transfer order was stayed for lcircumstances, it is not necei tftt'ylddl-l lllril'if S •(Riit^ix i|) Slf^H 3|A»I FSUS Labour ihattisgarh, Secretary, Ministry of •j-it, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) r.Labour Department, Raipur (CG) Cc|mmissioner, Raipur (CG) r^irecfor, (Estt). Head Office, Labour tit, Raipur (CG) ..abaur Commissioner, Bilaspur (CG) ^toral Officer, Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Ma.tltralaya, Raipur (CG) ;bmmission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, (ad, New Delhi. 1226 of the Constitutioa of India for the petitioner. rtheState. ^orking as a Labour Inspector, was r^gdalpur vide order dated 22.9.2005 Ipreferred a Writ Petition No.4945/05 |and execution of the order was stayed 2(p05, Subsequently, the petition itself 8.9.2006 with an observation that the |a period of one year and in these jsary to go into the validity of the EKii 1 --——r^ 3n^?T<BTR-)itb natT3n^9Td>li<fr ^ccT ^TRTTcCT, t»-<Tl<i<i<»;Rrti'ny lltlOl^'TT^ sn^ST iro> ('j^tg^E) ^200 /^ BTOTW'HlSd 3D^?T 2- iinpugned order, and the respo|ndent insist upon compliance of tjhe 22.9.2005. However, the respon|dent order as disinissal of the petitio| the petitioner froin his present p|l aut^orities are expected not to impugned transfer order dated authorities interpreting the above n, have initiated proceedings to relieve lace ofposting. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Ad'c|ocate fairly submits that in case the the order of Annexure P/3 considered and decided in the period of three weeks from the General appearing for the Sfate Ipetitioner files Tepresentation against 4ated 22.9.2008, the same shall be of order ofAnnexure P/2, within a of receipt 6f representation. lifeht dhte In view of submissions instant petition is disposed of representation against fhe order authority of the respondents. saine shaU be considered and d< order of Annexure P/2 passed three weeks. In the meanwhil' from his present place of posting <niofn<ni iiinl *t"fal<l •(Rlt^K iSsri^TSiftn (|)f leamed counsel for the State, the w(th liberty to the petitioner to file fresh |ofAnnexure P/3 before the competent O^i such representation being made, the ^cided on its own merits in the light of b^ this Court, within afurther period of ;, the petitioner shall not be relieved i, till his representation is d^cided. Sd/- :'. Dhirendra Mishra Judge