24.wp.3867.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3867 OF 2009 Sambhaji Dagadu Hendre. ..Petitioner. Versus Pune Municipal Corporation and 5 others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.P.D. Dalvi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.P. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P., for respondent No.5. Mr.S.S. Patwardhan, Advocate for respondent No.6 .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH, AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.:- 1. By this Petition, the petitioner claims that his representation against the order dated 6.10.2008 is not decided by the Commissioner and, therefore, the Commissioner should be directed to decide that representation. The petitioner has made representation against the order dated 6.10.2008. By that order, all that has been done by the Education Officer is that respondent No.6 has been directed to look after the charge of the Headmaster. She is neither appointed as 24.wp.3867.09 2 Headmaster nor even incharge headmaster. All that has been done is that she has been asked to look after the post while continuing on her post. There is no rule that while making such arrangement, rules of seniority is to be applied. There is no substance in the representation of the petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by directing the Commissioner to decide such representation. Writ Petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (K.K. TATED,J)