1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7857 of 2011 alongwith CWP Nos. 7858 & 7859 of 2011. Decided on: 22.9.2011 1. CWP No. 7857 of 2011. Ganga Ram Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 7858 of 2011. Nathu Ram Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 7859 of 2011. Narain Dass Vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim benefit of untrained period of service. That issue in principle is covered by the decision of this Court in Hira Lal versus State of H.P. & another in CWP No. 319 of 1997, decided on 17.6.2008. It is pointed out by the learned Deputy Advocate General that the petitioners in these 2 cases are Drawing teachers, whereas petitioner in Hira Lal's case was a JBT teacher . But it is seen from Annexure P-2 and various other orders that no distinction has been made between Drawing teachers and JBT teachers. 2. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, in the case of the petitioners, for counting the untrained period of service, in the light of the judgment, referred to above, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioners. 3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. September 22, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.