THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3179 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 04.07.2011 passed by III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada in I.A.No.702 of 2011 in O.S.No.961 of 2009. The petitioner/plaintiff, who filed the suit for permanent injunction against the respondent/defendant to restrain him from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule shop under the name and style “HOLLYWOOD TEA AND FASTFOODS” at Shop No.1 in Sri Krishna Devaraya Municipal Complex, Eluru Road, Arundalpet, Vijayawada-2, filed the above Interlocutory Application under Order XXVI Rule 9 C.P.C for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note down the existing physical features of the plaint schedule property. In the affidavit filed in support of the suit, it is stated that on 31.05.2011, the defendant being accompanied by one Vijaya Bhaskar, Noorjahan and his son Jawar Hussain broke open the locks and removed all his valuable items from the petition schedule property and since then the defendant has been illegally staying in the said premises. It is further stated that the defendant is trying to alter the structure and other physical features of the petition schedule property to screen away the evidence existing as on the date of filing of the suit i.e., on 20.06.2011. On dismissal of the said Interlocutory Application, the present revision is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. Since it is the admitted case of the petitioner/plaintiff that he was dispossessed from the plaint schedule property on 31.05.2011 and since then the respondent/defendant is in occupation of the same, appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the plaint schedule property does not serve any purpose. Further, in view of the contention advanced by the respondent that the Corporation Authorities themselves sealed the property, as the defendant fell in arrears of lease amount and that after the lease arrears were paid by the defendant, the Corporation authorities broke open the seal and handed over the keys to him on 31.05.2011, the Court below rightly dismissed Interlocutory Application. In view of the same, the impugned order does not suffer from any manifest illegality warranting interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J Date: 12.08.2011 va