1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR L.P.A.No. 73/2011 in W.P.No. 2436/2010 Municipal Council, Bramhapuri vs. Harishchandra Balkrishna Bhashakhetre. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. R.J.Kankale, Advocate for the appellant. CORAM : S.A.BOBDE & MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATE : 25.2.2011 Heard. The only contention, raised by the appellant- Municipal Council in this appeal, is that the learned Single Judge ought not to have held that the complaint is tenable under the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P.Act since there is a dispute about relationship of employer employee. We find from the Judgment of the learned Single Judge that the learned Single Judge not accepted the plea of the appellant inter alia on the ground that no proper pleadings were set out to show how the complainants were not employees of the Municipal Council and they were the employees of the contractor particularly when the complainants were working from the year 1992. The learned Single Judge has observed that the appellant failed to establish by any documentary 2` evidence to show that the respondents were working under the contractor. On the contrary, R.W. 2 Ramdas Thombre stated that there was no document to show that they were working under the contractor. The learned Single Judge has, thus, upheld the findings of fact considered by the two courts below. We see no reason to interfere with the Judgment of the learned Single Judge. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE patle