1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5368 of 2010 Udayan Anil Patil VERSUS Panjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyalaya (Maharajbagh Zoo) and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. K. N. Shukul, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Awachat, Advocate h/f Mr. A. M. Sambre, Advocate for the R.No.1 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 5th August, 2011. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ, order or direction to set aside the approval granted by the Central Zoo Authority of India, New Delhi to the transfer of one female Royal Bengal Tiger from Maharajbagh Zoo to the M.C. Zoological Park, Chhatbir, Punjab. Mr. Awachat, the learned counsel holding for Mr. A. M. Sambre, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 states that the respondent no.1 is not desirous of transferring any tiger from Maharajbagh Zoo, either male or female, to any other Zoo in India. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 states that in future, in case the respondent no.1 decides to transfer the tiger from Maharajbagh Zoo, the same would be done after following due procedure prescribed by law. 2 In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.1, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale