IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 25441 of 2008(D) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER : ---------------- C. MOHAMMEDKUTTY, S/O. ABDULLA, CHAMARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, THUVOOR, VAKKAD, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT : ----------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING : WP(C).No. 25441 of 2008(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT :- EXT.P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE S.T.A.T. IN M.V.A.R.P. NO.72/2008 DATED 18.03.2008 -TRUE COPY- P.A. TO JUDGE V.GIRI, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.25441 OF 2008 ------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is operating a regular stage carriage on the route Purathur - Koottai, has sought for a revision of his own timings. The application was rejected by the Secretary, RTA. Petitioner preferred a revision before the S.T.A.T. The same was allowed with a direction to consider the petitioner's request for revision of timings. Petitioner's grievance arises from the fact that further steps have not been taken by the respondent. Hence, the writ petition. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to take further steps pursuant to Ext.P1, and consider the petitioner's request for settlement of W.P.(C) 25441 of 2008 2 timings, in a timing conference to be convened in that behalf. Needful shall be done, as early as possible. It is made clear that the respondent shall consider the petitioner's request in accordance with the list of priority maintained in that behalf in his office. V.GIRI JUDGE pac