*W BIL Aspug/C§HAI scARH ‘”TT Writ Petition No. 15g of 2001 PETITION UNDER ARTIGJES 205/587 b) OF THE CONSPITUTION OF INDIA rvi w pE'rITmNER ~ gM'SHEo MURTI TIwARI, Son of Shri Gaya Prasad Tiwari, aged about 59 years, presently posted as Sub-Inspector (Police) at Thana Kurud, Distt .Dhantari residing at Kurud.‘Distt .Dhamtari _ VERSUS 1\,/srATE OF CHHATTxssARH, Through the Secretary! Department. of Home! Mantral aya, RAIPUR C.G-. DIRECI‘OR GENERAL POLICE PHD, commissioner' s Office, compound, RAIPUR C.G. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari c.c;. RE SPONDENP S \; ira’anw ( ‘lokuv (niacnm Ama.csvLr-DI-.u e “mun. in.» mm, unamm.’ ‘ rmu m”) \ j .‘. -vd v Hagm‘ w I ‘ I PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONsrITU'rIoN '1 or INDIA FOR IssUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION AND/OR ORDER. L f . ; “i g; i \ V I ‘ ‘ XI-HC—22 3mm mm . V. .1659/01 “arm a Wmmw 0.2.. ‘WW!§WW aawm " That the petiticner a£ter his successfu department and shal o£e16 months i.e. o 31.1.2003." I have nothing to c writ petitioner.c However ‘ supported by the affidav regards the date of reti inclinedeto bold that no issued in as much as to tioner on the eve of retireme t from hardshipgto' we writ pet view should be an important po1nt while consideringthe transfer of a government servant. The writ petitioner is said ' In the few facts and circmnsta‘nces of the gesent case; I have recorded above, in my view in stead of allowing the prayer for time nade by sending this matter to the state Trimnal. be disposed of today its of transfer issued on 17 [in the gesent facts and \ ‘impugned’uo‘rder of transferxss‘ued In the result, the on 17.7.2001 by the Director General of Police,Raipur is ionerxshal 1k be a110wed to continue ement.’~-~I—’tid.s stated at the Bar that m served. uponzxaie petitioxer tilldate order of relief has been 1/2001 50,000, is on the verge/of retirement ' L exemplary service in the police be retiring just after a period mment on the service record o£ the since this statement has been t. I‘have no reason to doubt as ement. on this score alone. I; am order of transfer shouldhm been i o so would certainly cause in umerabl :o be on medical leave. q the state counsel and in stead of the matter should =lf In my View the impagned order .7 2001 is unreasonable and unfair 4 ~ V/ circumstances of the case. set-aside.'rhe writ pet‘it e at Kuru’d until his retir GRPRJ FS/3 ‘11 ooé + service. This act in my_