IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. N0^ _^ y_^' /2003 Single Bench APPELLANT < CLAIMANT ^-. %.< ^^ .... ^^>-' t^ '^- ^^•'^ ^-.Baijnath, Son of Charan, Caste Paswan, aged about 65 years, Occupation Electrician, Resident of Village Charcha, P.S. and Tahsil - Baikunthpur, Present address Surajpur Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja C.G. V E R SUS KESPONDENTS /NON-APPL ICANTS Sharad Kumar Singh ©Chhotu, Son of Satish Kumar Singh, aged about 19 years, Resident of Charcha Staff Golony quarter no. 11, Police Chawki Charcha, P.S. and Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koria Chhattisgarh. ( DRIVER ) Ramcharan, Son of Ramprasad Panika^ ^ y 1 aged about 39 years, Occupation Service,. Resident of Co-operative line Charcha, Quarter no. 31, Police Chawki Charcha, P.S. and Tahsilt .Baikunthpur, District Koria C.G. ( OtMER ) l~ AFPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 of MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1983 RE&D WITH ORDER 43 RULE 1 (A) OP C.P.C. IN TH1 APPELI ( CLAIM^ ^o '^: '^-" RESPONI ' NON-API )-<-?' \. ^e/ ^L (^ \~yc> ^ '^ ^v^v' ..)\v '^^rf 2-A Jagmati, W/o Late Ramcharan, aged bout 36 years, ^ Occupadon - Housewife. •^ ^ ^ -^" 2-B Virendra Kumar, S/o Ramcharan, aged about 20 Occupation-Labourer. Respondent No.2-A 8s 2-B are R/o Village Shivpur [Charcha] Tahsil-Baikunthpur, District Koriya [C.G.j :^ APPEAL 01 WITH ORD] HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MANo. 847 of2003 AnpeUant/ Oaimant Respondents Baijnath Versus Sharad Kumar Singh & Others Aopeal under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehicles Act SB: H«m'bleShriJusUc«N.K.Aearwd. Present : Shri Ashok Shukla with Shri Atanu Ohosh, Advocates for the appellant. Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate for respondent No. 1. ORALORDER (Passed on 14UI day ofJufy, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the ^pellant seeks pennission ofthis court to withdraw this q>peal witii liberty to file claim application before the jurisdictional court i.e. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Baikunlhpur, Distt. Koriya (CG). 2. On due consideration, prayer is allowed and the appeliant is pennitted to withdraw Ihe appeal. 3. Accordingly, Ifae appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order asto costs. 4. Registry is directed to retum tiie certified copy of the impi^ned order on eounsel's famishing aulfaenticated tme copy oflfae same. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge Sahu