1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Second Appeal No.181 of 2007 [Mainabai B. Nikam Vs. Shashikala B. Thakare & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.L. Khapre, Advocate for the appellant. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 01st November,2007. Heard. The defendant no.8 is aggrieved by the share allotted to plaintiff and defendant no.1 quantified by the decree. The challenge is based on entitlement of defendant no.1 and her sons, on the ground that the marriage of defendant no. 1 was void. This issue has been answered in negative by the Trial Court and said finding is confirmed by the First Appellate Court. The Appellant has not been in a position to demonstrate as to how said finding is perverse or otherwise wholly impermissible. The appeal, therefore, does not raise any Substantial Question of Law. 2 Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|