z/ \c% \ u\9\ %?( HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTXSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5537 01‘21107 PETITIONER : Frances Lakda S/o. Late Sheel Baush Lakda, aged about 38 years, Rio ViHage and post Shigj Bahar (Jatatoli), Tah. Farsabahar, P.S‘ Tapkara, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) . State of Chhattisgarh, Through: - The Secretary, Department ofHome, D K S Bhawan, Raipur (C G ) , { 2. The Dxrector General 01 Police Pollce Head Quarter { State of Chhattlsgarh, Ralpur (C G ) VERSUS 3. Inspector General or Pohce Bllaspur Range,” Bnaspur (C G ) Supermtendent ofPolice Anuppur (C G ) Supenntendem of Pohce, Bllaspur (C G ) 'Umon of Indra through - its Secreiary ‘ Public Gnevances Cal} Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market New De1h1 Q\AUI‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA SB' Hon’ble Shrl Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present. Sim Sourabh Dangl Advocate tor the petmoner r Sim Ajay Dwwed1, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No 1 2 3 and 4 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10m day of January, 2008) amed counsel appeaung for the petxtxoner does not want to press this petltlon on ment at this stage However learned counsel prays that the respondent authontles be directed to consnier his representatmn dated‘ 09.07.2007 (Annexure PB), expeditiously, in accordance with law, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State has no objection. In View of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of with a direction‘toy the respondent No 3 to consider and decide the representation as stated above, expedmously: as far as poss1ble preferably Wtthm a period of three weeks from the date ofrece1pt ofa copy ofthls order Sdl— Sat‘sh K Agmhotn Judge