IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14870 of 2005 KRISHNA KUMAR TIWARI son of Shri Bikarma Tiwary, resident of village-Sallahpur, P.S.- Mohammadpur, Dist.-Gopaplganj. ……. ……..Petitioner Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA through Secretary, Defence, Government of India, New Delhi 2.Director General of E.M.E. Army Head Quarters, New Delhi 3.Director-in-Chief, Medical Service, Army Head Quarters, New Delhi 4.P.A.O. (OR) Record Officer, E.M.E., Secunderabad. 5.Controller of Defence, Accounts, Allahabad. ……. ……Respondents ----------- 5. 4.2.2011. Heard Mr.Diwakar Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India. Since the petitioner retired from Armed Forces (Army) and he has prayed for retiral dues, the court is of the opinion that the matter cannot be adjudicated by this court. The retiral dues is covered under the definition of service matter in Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. In view of the provisions contained in section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, it is directed to transmit the record of this case to the Armed Forces Tribunal (East Zone) located at Kolkata, West Bengal. Office may take steps for transmitting the record to the Tribunal. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)