IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1485 of 2009 ROHIT ABHISHEK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 27.02.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the CBSE and the learned Counsel for the DAV Public School CBSE, New Punaichak, Patna. In view of the moulded submissions on behalf of the petitioner, not objected to by the respondents, this Court does not consider it necessary to incorporate the entire facts and counter facts of the case. The petitioner admittedly does not have the mandatory 75% attendance under Bye-law no. 13.2 of Chapter 4 of the Bye- laws of the CBSE which becomes an impediment in permitting him to appear at Class X Examination. Learned Senior Counsel Shri Rajiv Kumar Verma for the petitioner submits that the young boy, at this stage, is unable to make up his mind whether he would like to continue within the same institution in the next academic schedule to appear at the Class X final examination or whether he would like to obtain a School Leaving Certificate to pursue his studies at another institution. Shri Chitranjan Sinha learned Senior Counsel appearing for the DAV Public School submits that the School has no objection to either of the options that may be chosen by the petitioner. The writ application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)