1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.460 OF 2007 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.731 OF 2006 Sheru Thaku Ajwani & Ors. .... Plaintiffs Vs. Smt. Sneha Lata Rajan Nikale & Ors. .... Defendants Ms Sushma Singh (in support) for the Plaintiffs. CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED: APRIL 30, 2010 P.C: Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiffs. Perused the affidavit in support of the chamber summons. The plaintiffs have prayed for permission to amend the plaint as per the Schedule annexed to the affidavit in support of the chamber summons. The chamber summons is not opposed, though the defendants are served. According to the learned counsel for the plaintiffs, the proposed amendment is necessary to decide the suit. The amendment, as proposed, is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within 2 three weeks. Copy of the amended plaint be placed on the record and so also copy be served upon the defendants. Chamber summons accordingly stands disposed of. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)