IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION(L)NO.1330/2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.521/1992 Henkel Chemicals(India)Ltd. Petitioner Vs. M/s Garware Nylons Ltd.& Ors.(in liqn.) Respondents And Pravin Mahadev Dhole Applicants Vs. M/s Accumen Investment & Finance Pvt.Ltd.& Ors. Respondents Mr.Anand Grover a/w Ms.F.Moosa i/b Ramesh Mahadik for applicant Mr.S.Ramakantha Dy.O.L. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 15th January,2009. P.C. 1] In all 170 workmen of the company in liquidation seek an order setting aside the order dated 18/6/2004 passed by the learned Judge in favour of the respondents confirming the sale of the property in favour of the respondents upon their paying proportionate value on account of the land having been found to be in excess of what was originally mentioned. 2] It was submitted that ,the fact that there was excess land was admitted ,indicates that the order was passed on an incorrect representation by the Company and the purchasers. It was further submitted that the order was passed without following the normal procedure. 3] This contention does not arise on an application for setting 2 aside the order . The order has admittedly not been reviewed . This contention can only be raised in an application to review the order. Application is disposed of accordingly.