1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.01.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Writ Petition (MD)Nos.536 and 537 of 2011 N.Thangavel ... Petitioner in W.P.No.536/2011 Krishnamoorty ... Petitioner in W.P.No.537/2011 Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The District Collector cum District Magistrate, Dindigul District,Dindigul. 3.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Sempatti, Dindigul District. ... Respondents in both W.P's Common Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 11.01.2011 preferred by the petitioners in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.K.A.Nandagopan Additional Government Pleader COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made an endorsement indicating that the prayer made in the writ petitions have become infructuous. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 In view of the endorsement so made, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Ad) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The District Collector cum District Magistrate, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Sempatti, Dindigul District. +one cc to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No.3350 W.P.(MD)Nos.536 and 537 of 2011 27.01.2011 ps/pm SMA/23.2.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/