IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14041 of 2006 DAROGA SINGH, SON OF LATE PADUM SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – MAGADH VIHAR, H.NO. 26-B, P.S. – GARDANIBAGH, DISTRICT - PATNA Versus THE BIHAR STATE CO-OPT.BANK LTD. THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN, THE BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD. HEAD OFFICE, ASHOK RAJPATH PATNA -4. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, THE BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ASHOK RAJPATH, PATNA – 4. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE BIHAR STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ASHOK RAJPATHY, PATNA -4. 4. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, (PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATION) THE BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ASHOK RAJPATH, PATNA -4 5. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (FINANCE AGRICULTURE) THE BIHAR STATE CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ASHOK RAJPATH, PATNA -4 ----------- 11. 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit stating therein that the grievance of the petitioner which has still remained to be paid by the respondent is detailed in paragraph – 4 of the supplementary affidavit. A reply to the said affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Bank. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the reply is not specific with regard to the claim made in the aforesaid paragraph -4 and as - 2 - such, petitioner is entitled to the claims as made in paragraph -4 of the supplementary affidavit. However, with regard to the claim for provident fund amounting to Rs. 2, 10, 370/- it is submitted that petitioner will ventilate his grievance in an appropriate proceeding. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that in case petitioner raises any grievance which has been remained unpaid on account of his retiral dues, the same shall be looked into. In the above circumstances, it is submitted that for redressal of the grievances, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order explaining the claims made in paragraph 4 of the supplementary affidavit, the respondent no. 3 shall consider and dispose of the same. Upon such consideration if any amount is found payable the same shall be paid to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months on receipt/production of the certified copy of the present order. It goes without saying that if any amount which is ready for payment, however awaiting certain formality to be completed, the petitioner shall be communicated - 3 - about that formality, and after completion of the same the amount shall be paid even before the expiry of two months as indicated above. Upon reconsideration if any fund is found not payable, the petitioner shall be communicated the same along with the reasons for not allowing the claim. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.),