FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.143 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Shri Vikas Mali, for the petitioners. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. DATED: 08.02.2008 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. In this writ petition, the petitioners have made the following prayer. (a) That the order passed by the Ld. Civil Judge Junior Division Islampur, below Exh.17 in Regular Darkhast No.182/86 and the consequent order dated 22.11.1990 passed below Exh.1 in Regular Darkhast No.182/86 and the order in Appeal dated 11.10.1996 passed by the Addl.District Judge Sangli in Regular Civil Appeal No.33/91 be quashed and set aside." It appears that earlier a civil revision application was filed in this court against the very same orders which are impugned in the present petition. The civil revision application was dismissed vide order dated 28.11.2002 as not maintainable. The petitioners,thereafter, on 13.12.2007 filed the instant writ petition. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, Darkhast proceeding is still pending and that has not been finally disposed of. If that be so, it is always open for the petitioners to challenge the order disposing of the Darkhast proceedings finally. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India deserves to be rejected on the ground of delay and latches. The writ petition accordingly fails and disposed of as such. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)