IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9841 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Pushpinder Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Navlesh Verma, learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that since the agreement entered into by respondent No.5 is over, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?