IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 610 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19/04/2008 in WP NO : 19199 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Smt. Anjana, W/o. Sri Ravinder Kumar, R/o. 21-1-714, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad - 500 002. 2 Smt. Sunitha, W/o. Sri Gopal Agarwal, R/o. 21-1-714, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad - 500 002. 3 Smt. Sunitha Agarwal, W/o. Sri Mukesh, R/o. 21-1-714, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad - 500 002. 4 Smt. Sheela, W/o. Sri Vinod Kumar, R/o. 21-1-714, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad - 500 002. 5 Smt. parol Agarwal, W/o. Sri Sravan Kumar, R/o. 21-1-714, Rikab Gunj, Hyderabad - 500 002. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Office of Collectorate, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 Special Deputy Collector, O/o. Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), International Airport, Shamshabad At Collectorate, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, To Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, A.P., Hyderabad. Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants:DR.I.SUJATHA M/S. I.L.N.SASTRY, LAW OFFICE Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 610 of 2008 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Anil R.Dave, CJ) The order dated 19.04.2008 passed in writ petition No.19199 of 2007 has been challenged in this appeal. We are in agreement with the findings of the learned single Judge to the effect that the appellants/petitioners ought to have raised all contentions when they had filed a petition on the same subject at an earlier point of time. Writ petition No.6823 of 2006 filed by the present appellants/original petitioners had been rejected by this Court at an earlier point of time. The points, which could have been taken in the said petition, were not taken and therefore, the writ petition with which we are dealing, was rejected by the learned single Judge. We do not see any illegality committed by the learned single Judge while rejecting the petition. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. _________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 24th June 2008 ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J ajr To 1 The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Office of Collectorate, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 Special Deputy Collector, O/o. Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), International Airport, Shamshabad At Collectorate, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Principal Secretary to Government of A.P., Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.