IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2010 / 18TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21419 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ABDUL SALAM.T., PART-TIME URDU TEACHER, A.U.P.SCHOOL-CHEMBRAKULAM, COYALMANNAM, KOTTAI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, A.U.P.SCHOOL- CHEMBRAKULAM, COYALMANNAM, KOTTAI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678572. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, COYALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 4. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN FOR R2 TO R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21419 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T In the matter of denial of approval of appointment as Full-time Urdu Teacher by group “C” diversion, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P7 revision petition dated 17.6.2010 before the fifth respondent. The said revision petition was filed after unsuccessfully resorted to the remedies available under the statute before respondents 2 and 4. The second respondent rejected the claim of the petitioner as per Ext.P3. In the revision preferred against Ext.P3, the fourth respondent affirmed the order in Ext.P3 and rejected the revision as per Ext.P5. The contention of the petitioner is that the entitlement of the petitioner to get appointment and approval as a Full-time Urdu Teacher by group “C” diversion was not properly addressed by any of the authorities. In such circumstances, considering the fact that Ext.P7 revision petition is now pending before the fifth respondent, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the fifth respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 revision in the light of relevant Government Orders expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two WPC No.21419/2010 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner may submit supplementary representation pointing out all the relevant Government Orders along with a copy of this judgment. C.T.RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) vps WPC No.21419/2010 3