IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-30928 of 2009 Date of Decision:1.4.2010 Malkiat Kaur .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Chautala, A.A.G. Punjab. Mr. G.S. Nahel, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) It is stated that the present petitioner is daughter of the deceased. It is further stated that no role has been attributed to the petitioner in the FIR. However, subsequently, statements of Chand Singh and Jeet Singh were recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. wherein it was stated that the present petitioner was trying to stop her husband from quarreling with her father. Thus, there is no allegation against her. She is in custody since 21.5.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangrur. 1.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE