1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 231/2006 Sunil Prabhakarrao Patil ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and 6 others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: A. P. LAVANDE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 6 th September, 2007 Heard Mr. S. D. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the petitioner, Mrs. K. P. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 7 and Mr. N. P. Dhote, Advocate for respondent No. 5. None present on behalf of respondent No.6, though served. Mr. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been regularised in the service of the School run by respondent No. 6. However, salary for the period from December-2005 to October-2006 has not been paid. He further states that the petitioner will make representation to respondent No. 6 for payment of salary from December-2005 to October-2006 within a period of four weeks and a direction be issued to decide the same within a reasonable time. Since, the main grievance of the petitioner has been already met, nothing survives in the petition. Insofar as payment of salary for the period of December-2005 to October-2006 is concerned, the petitioner is granted liberty to make representation within a period of four weeks to 2 respondent No. 6. In case, such a representation is made, respondent No. 6 shall decide the same within a period of six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE kahale