1 SSK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 102 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2545 OF 2006 Shankar H. Rajanna & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority & Ors. ....Respondents and Matoshree Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ....Applicants. Mr. Kunal Cheema, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P.G.Lad, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 7. Mr. R. N. Kachare, Advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr. J. Reis with Mr. Y.M.Choudhari, Advocate for Respondent No.6. Mr. Madhav Jamdar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 10 to 42. Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar, Advocate for BMC. Mr. Atul Rajadhyaksha, Sr.Counsel with Mr. G. S. Godbole, Advocate for Applicants in Chamber Summons No.102 of 2010. CORAM : F. I. REBELLO & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATE : 18TH JUNE, 2010. P.C.: This is an application by the Applicants to implead them as party Respondents in the writ petition. The Applicants have filed an independent 2 writ petition (lodging) no.956 of 2010 which is also on board. The Petitioners in the present petition has sought a motion for redevelopment of the suit property. The case of the Petitioners in writ petition (lodging) no. 956 of 2010 is that they are entitled to redevelop the property. Considering that, if any, relief is given to the Petitioners in the present case, it will affect the right of the Applicants. In the light of that, the chamber summons is made absolute interms of prayer clause (a). 2. The Petitioners to amend the cause title within one week from today. 3. Office to place both the petitions on board on 2nd July, 2010. (R. V. MORE, J.) (F. I. REBELLO, J.)