IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12290 of 2004 Between: A. Papaiah, s/o Balaiah, Fishermen Cooperative Society, R/o Kotapally, Peddamul Mandal, Ranga Reddey District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Fisheries, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Director of Fisheries/ Ex. Officio Deputy Registrar of Coop. Societies, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Fisheries Development Officer, Miminpet, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ forbearing the respondents from giving effect to the enquiry report of the 3rd respondent (FDO, Mominpet) dated 17-6-2004 and also the show cause notice of the 2nd respondent in R.C.No. 510/B/2004, dated 28-6- 2004 after declaring the same as illegal, void and without jurisdiction, Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.INNAYYA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12290 OF 2004 ORDER : The main writ petition is filed challenging the show-cause notice dated.28-06-2004 under which the petitioner herein was called upon as to why he should not be disqualified from the post of the President of Fishermen Cooperative Society, Kotapally, Peddamul Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under Section.21-A(d) of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act,1964 for the reasons specified there under. Though this Court initially granted interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned show cause notice, subsequently after hearing both the parties by order dated.22.11.2004 the said order was vacated. The petitioner has not challenged the said order dated.22.11.2004 nor any other ground is made out before this Court to show that the impugned show cause notice suffers from any error of jurisdiction warranting interference by this Court. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. 1st December 2008 *TSNR