HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGA H AT BILASPUR Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. $anjay Agrawal, Son 0f Ram Awtar Agrawai, aged about 4'0 years, Proprietor — Anupam Patra Udyog, Choubey Coiony, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (MR) State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgavh), through— Secretary, Schocl Education Department. Vallahh Bhawan, BHOPA! (MP). The Commissioner, Public instructions, Schoal Edueatrcn Department, BHOPAL (MP). The Deputy Director, Public Instructions, Schoei Edueation Department. KANKER DI$TT. BASTAR (MP). PETETQIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGNST‘TUTION OF {NDIA single Bench : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. None appears for the petirroner. Shri $umesh Eajaj, Govt. Advocate far the respondents/State. Amit , (Passed on this 27‘” day of July, 2007) A‘ The matter is eelted for hearing twice. On both the occasions none appears nor any representation is made on behaif of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. in view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Writ Petition No. 1W5 of 1998 GRDER @ /