HIQH GGURT OP CHHATNSGARH AT BBLASPUR sstVi^Pw^ss^Bawyyns^pwmx^ TOWAKSK PBTITIOWBRS CR.M.P. N0. 271/2009 1. AnilaKumari, D/o. RamAvtar, aged about 45 years, Caste Keshanvaai, R/o, Bauripara, P.S. Ambikapur, Distt, Surguja (CG) 2. Kedar^ S/o. Jagdish, aged about 48 ye^rs, r/o, Baunpara, P.S. Anibikapur, distt. Sui^uja(CG) 3. Ganjha, S/o. Madhu Thakur, Caste Kanwar, r/o. ViBage Parsa, P.S. Ambikapur, Distnct Surguja (CG) RBSPONDBKT8 4. yersms t. Sonu, S/o. Baadhany R/o, Vills^e Parsa, P,S. Ambifeapur Distt. Surguja (CG) Srikiimaii E)wivedi, S/o, Ramji Dwivedi, r/o. Bauripara., Ambikapur, P,S, Ambikapur, Distt Surguja (CG) 2. The State of Chhattisgarh, Throu^i titie CoUector, Sarguja Ambikapiir Distfc Sux^uja (CG) APPLKSATIOW UHDBR SBGTK1W 482 <»rTHB <X»DBOP CRIMINAL PROCBDURB. X973 Appearaiice; Shri A.K.Prasad, counsel fi>r fhe petidoiiers, Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. for fhe State/rcsp. No.2. <^AL OM>BR (17.06.2009) The pxeseixt petiflon haa beeii filed by the petiticmers wha:eby fhe court below has rejected llieir applieatioii for discliarge, Leanied counsel for fhe petitioiiers contends fhat once after eaquixy^ ffcie poUce has fouxid fhat there is no substance m fhe complaiiit ffled by ffae complamadt fhea fhe courts below ought nQt have iaterfered ia the coxxiplaiiit case, I have heard coiiiisel for fhe parties aad also peniaed the record, The Courtbelow, after gomg througli ffae record^ had e5£ercised its jurisdiction in accordaace with law amd I find no illegality in the same, The petltion has no substaiice and the saaie is accordiagly dismissed at the motioii stage itseif. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge