IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14327 of 2008 Between: Guguloth Somala S/o.Bena H.No.1-1-1 Bhadrachalam Road Paloncha(V&M) Khammam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector/Agent to Government Khammam District 2 The Project Officer I.T.D.A Bhadrachalam,Khammam District 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Paloncha,Khammam District 4 The Tahasildar Paloncha(M) at Paloncha Khammam District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1 to 4 in taking appropriate action on the representations of the petitioner dt.19-5-2007&25-5-2007 to protect the property admeasuring ac 6-05 gts in Sy.No.20 situated at Paloncha(V&M) Khammam District as illegal,arbitrary,and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents take immediate action on the said representations of the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 14327 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. This writ petition has been filed by Guguloth Somla with a prayer to issue a writ or direction preferably a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 4 on the representations dated 19-5-2007 and 25-5-2007 seeking protection of his possession in respect of land admeasuring Ac.6-05 guntas in Sy.No. 20, situated at Paloncha (V & M) Khammam District as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for social welfare for respondents. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of the property and he apprehends dispossession by some non-tribal and therefore, he seeks direction to the respondents to give necessary protection to the petitioner. 4. Indisputably there is no dispossession of the petitioner from the lands in occupation. If he apprehends dispossession from the private parties, he has to take recourse to the Agency Court as provided under Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924. Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, is wholly misconceived. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 4th July, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 14327 OF 2008 4th July, 2008.