HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Civii Revision No. 46 of 2009 Applicant DefendantNo.S Non applicant Plaintiff -vv. Budh Dev Ram, S/o DukhmaRam, aged about SOyears, R/o Village and Post Jingo; District Surguj'a (CG). Versus 1. State Bank of India, Branch Rajpur, District Surguja (CG) through its Branch Manager. 2. Smt. Miio Bai W/o late Gulab Ram, R/o Village Sewari, Post Sewari. 3. Sunil Kumar S/o late Gulab Ram, R/o Village Sewari, Post Sewari. 4. Kumari Anita Daughter of late Gulab Ram, R/oVJIIage Sewari, Post Sewari. 5. Smt. Sukhmaniya Bai D/o late Gulab Ram, R/o Vjliage Sewari, Post Sewari. 6. Maheshwar Ram S/o Happu Ram R/o viiiage and post Rajpur. Respondent No. 2 to 6 are R/o District Surguja (CG). CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVfc PR0CEDURE, 1908 (SinaleBench: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Aaarwal, J.^ Present Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondents. 1. ,^'\ - 2. 3. 4. Sahu ORALORDER (Passed on 13th day ofApril, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instruction, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this revision with liberty to avail appropriate remedy that may be available to him under the provisions of law. Prayer is allowed. Consequently, the revision Is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order asto costs. Learned counsel for the appticant prays thatcertifjed copy of the impugned order be returned to him. Registry is directed to return the certifiedcopy of the impugned order on counsel's furnishing authenticated true copyofthesame. Consequently, ail pending applications stand disposedof. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^.?i"i ...-^