IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11421 of 2009 RAJU MISHRA @ RAJEEV KUMAR MISHRA son of Lakshman Mishra , resident of village- Lakhnour, P.S.- Lakhnour, District- Madhubani. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 06.05.2009 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the complaint case in the prayer portion. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner had earlier moved an application for grant of anticipatory bail along with other accused persons namely, Sanjeev Mishra & Laxman Mishra vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34851 of 2008. The application on behalf of Sanjeev Mishra was dismissed as infructuous as per order dated 28.08.2006 as he was arrested during the pendency of the application. By order dated 23.09.2008 the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of this petitioner was rejected and case diary was called for consideration of the prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner Laxman Mishra, who was later allowed anticipatory bail by order dated 22.10.2008 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on account of certain confusion with regard to the name of the accused persons namely, Raju Mishra @ Rajeev Kumar Mishra and the co-accused namely, Rajeev Jha, it could not be clarified by the petitioner that the specific allegation was against Rajeev Jha and there was absolutely no allegation against the petitioner Raju Mishra and on account of the above confusion of learned counsel appearing on behalf of this petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 34851 of 2008 could not clarify. Consequently the application of this petitioner was rejected. Learned counsel appearing for the State on perusal of the complaint in question is not in position to refute the submissions of the petitioner that there is absolutely no allegation against this petitioner namely, Raju Mishra. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur in connection with Madhepur ( Lakhnour ) P.S. Case No. 195 of 2006 arising out of complaint Case No. 474 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) Manish/-