n IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) VIO.<,~S{{^OF2QQ8 PETITIONER : ,^(2,^.1:-^"$' s ^''.."f'^y' '^..-••'l'a \@'-' (§^--'"" y.'-" a«»- k-iW RESPONDENTS : ^' . "^ •&' w. 'y^ iww i ^^ K X^ M i.'iy;i.C"'—€^" •S' '%>:*"' ais€rsy '""•^MWS^' V .t Sunil Ghodeswar, S/o Jhumuklal Ghodeswar, aged about ^. 35 years, presenfly posted and working as Draftsman in the office of the Assistant Land Conservation Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG). Versus 1. • State of Chhattisgarh, Through i . the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). 2. Deputy Secretary, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 4. Assistant ^L^nd Conservation Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IHon. Mr. Justice Prltink ^jf s . *f\ w Writ (S) .8 of 2001 DCTITSftM.CB ES'fC i; s i B^F^^-^ VERSUS Suni! Ghodeswar. State of Chhattisaarh and others. Shri Shashank Thakur counsei for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain PL forthe respondents/State. Lli With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the mafier is heard finaliy. Challenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 23.9.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.1 v/hereby the order dated 7.7.2008 transfemng the petitloner to Rajnandgaon as Assistant Soii Conservation Officer from Dhamtari has been cancelied thouoh the said order has aiready been exeouted, in v'iolation ofthe transfer poliey. T'iThis petition was filed on 30.9.2008 and the stay was granted in favour ofthe petitioner vide oro'er dated 13.10.2008. Contention of the counsel for the parties is that this Court may quash the impugned transrer order by giving liberty to the respondents to -I' pa-ss fresh order ifadministrative exigencyso warrants. in view of the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and iooking to the fact that the petition was filed on 30.9.2008 and stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 13.10.2008, the impugnea order o'ated 23.9.2008 so far as it reiafes to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the respondents shafi be free to pass the order afresh if administrative exigency necessitates the same. 'With the aforesaid obser/ation, the petition stands disposea' i-p <JI. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge