'S^t •^wm<i,w^ww, faciiyy *<i*«ii fl»*n^» •W[ 200 9> SfI^T ll'n (i^?f3SI^tf) 311^1 'V! R-)i<* '(CT 3H^F »*ti<ft ?-«ti<(Rttf^tl ^tfl^fl APPELLANT: Petitioner -V RESPONDENTS: ViS!l Hon. Shri Dhlrendra iVlishra & : Hon. Shri R.M. Chandrakar. >JJ. Shri L.C. Das, counsei forthel Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawv4r cp!<ifCT<fli timflf'^ Fs^l <r»K^.x ^T^iRm aii^i Subhash Dhuba!, S./o Shri Shankar Dhubal, aged about 38 year, panc&ayat Karmi (Secretary), Grarn Panchayat Baitari, R/o Viliage Baita'i. Tahs" Sara'pail, District Mahasamund (CG) •rsus- State of Chhattisgarh acting through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Weifare Department, D.K.S. iuilding, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) Deputy Director, Panchayat and Sociai Weifare, District Mahasamund (CG) Chief Execut've Officer, -Janpad Panchayat Saraipaii; Distrtct Mahasamund (CG) Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Mahasamund (CG.) Sarpanch, Grsm Panchayat Baitari, Janpad PansSayat, Saraipali, Tahs'! . Saraipal', , Qistrict Mahasamund (CG) appellaht. for the State. '(HO'61-4 M<1 iii;»llfMIUal-ii -11/2008—1,00,000. 35 ''^s/' ^^s^,t ^sf '^WM^, &-^W\Q, hviwy. NTHCll a»*fiqi "W( 200 3]I^?I^V (>i?tsi't?) au^lv l<-li«b "(rar sn^i %qw 33've iWltilT ^lfCT •Ml^tt ^- Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counse| Ths appellant being aggrie^ 2007 passed in W.P.(S) No.72.46/2C From perusal of the order, it| foy the appeiiant has been dismiss< glternatjve, efficacious and sfatutc Chhattisgarh Panchayat (Appeal ari has preferred th's appeal on the gi sntertained the writ petition and cji matter of Roopiai Nayak Vs. Stat^ apflel Learned counsel for the disposed of with ilt^srty to the appe] the 'ight ofjudgment in the matter o| Learned counsel for the ress: is disposed of with the aforesaid'terl In view of the submissions rt the instant appea! is dispo^ed, appropriate reviewpetition inthe !y Nayak (Supra). DhirendraMishra Judge i*l'<f~l4)-< ^lldf'^ls^ <("it$i< ^? sifiiH aii^ff for respondent No.5. led by the srder datsd 7 December, 107 has preferred this writ appeai. appears that the writ petltion preferred |d on the ground that the appeiiant has ^ry rerr'edy of filing appeal under the Revision) Rules, 1995. The appeilant bund that on similar facts this Court has isposed of the same on merits in the of Chhattisaarh and others reported ofr tellant submits thai thls appea) may be iant tp file appropriate revlew petition'in Rooplal Nayak (Supra). te haye no objectio" ifthe appeai •ns. . lade by Jearned c61fl=>se! for the partifes, f with libertv to the aogeliant 'to file ofjudgment in the matter of'Roop'a! Sd.'- R.N.Chandrakar Judge KB •I@ a as »1]*1<0<1<l!i)iT'p"lloUI <W-!i<;'li«l—I;S/»5 —11/2008—1,00,000.