IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1929 RSA.No. 239 of 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.7.2004 IN A.S.NO.52/2001 OF SUB COURT, VADAKARA UPHOLDING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.06.2001 IN OS.NO.226/1999 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, NADAPURAM APPELLANT/APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT -------------------------------------------------- KOILOTH KRISHNAN NAIR, S/O.KALLIANI AMMA, AGED 72 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT NELLIYULLA PRAMBIL, KUTTIADY AMSOM, OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH SRI.ANIL GEORGE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5 ------------------------------------------------------ 1. NARKOOTTUM CHALIL KUNHURAMAN NAIR, S/O.KELU NAIR, AGED 58 YEARS, MILITARY SERVICE, RESIDING AT THEKKAN MANALIL, THRIVENI NILAYAM, PALLIKKUNNU AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, KERALA STATE. 2. KALLULLATHIL NANU, S/O.KELU, AGED 41 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, RESIDING AT NELLIYULLA PARAMBIL, KUTTIADY AMSOM OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. 3. KANNACHANDI ALI, S/O.AMMAD, AGED 45 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT KURUNGOTT, KUTTIADI AMSOM OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. 4. PUTHENPURAYIL ABDU JAMAL, AGED 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT KURUNGOTT, KUTIADI AMSOM OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. 5. PUTHENPURAYIL PATHOOTTY, S/O.MOIDU, AGED 26 YEARS, SWASTAM, RESIDING AT KURUNGOTT, KUTTIADI AMSOM OORATH DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.BEHANAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 26/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- R.S.A. NO. 239 OF 2005 C and C.M.APPL. NO. 173 OF 2005 in R.S.A. NO. 239 OF 2005 C -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th February, 2008 JUDGMENT In spite of granting enough time, the defects are not cured. C.M.Appl.No.173 of 2005, the petition for condoning the delay of 27 days in filing the Regular Second Appeal, is, therefore, dismissed for default. Consequent on the dismissal of the petition for condoning the delay, the Regular Second Appeal is also dismissed for default. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to take steps to cure the defects within two weeks and to file an application for restoration of the Regular Second Appeal. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- R.S.A.NO. 239 OF 2005 C JUDGMENT 26th February, 2008 -------------------------------------------