IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.22470 of 2010 BADHO MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 364 A of the I.P.C. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Three persons namely Subodh Singh, Gopal Singh and Mantu Ram were abducted. Mantu Ram and Subodh Singh have not named this petitioner. One Gopal Singh has named this petitioner in para.-71 of the case diary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aforesaid Gopal Singh has taken the name of the petitioner in the statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. He further submits that the father of Gopal Singh also stated that statement of Gopal Singh under Section 161 of Cr.P.C is correct. Petitioner has been taken in custody on 24.04.2010 and the case is of the year, 2004. The petitioner has three cases against him. In view of the fact that the petitioner has surrendered late on 24.04.2010 and also involved in three other cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after three months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)