THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3739 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.284 of 2005 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur, against the respondents, for the relief of injunction, in relation to the renewal of a tobacco barren licence. The 1st respondent is his brother and the 2nd respondent is the representative of the Tobacco Board. The trial of the suit commenced. The 1st respondent took the plea that the petitioner gave his consent for transferring his rights in the licence and a document was filed in relation thereto. The petitioner filed I.A.No.892 of 2010, with a prayer to send the document for analysis by an Expert. The application was allowed. However, the Expert took the view that, in the absence of any undisputed signatures on contemporaneous documents, executed by the petitioner, it would not be possible to express any opinion. The petitioner did not supply any contemporaneous documents. However, he filed I.A.No.78 of 2011 for the same purpose. The trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 04.05.2011. Hence, this revision. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The request of the petitioner to send the disputed document for an analysis by an Expert was acceded to and no result ensued, on account of non-availability of contemporaneous documents. The present application filed by him is for the same purpose and he categorically stated that he does not possess any contemporaneous documents. The trial Court took the view that same result would ensue, even after this application is ordered. This petitioner is not able to point out as to how the situation would improve, if the document is sent for opinion, for the second time, without there being any contemporaneous documents. Further, the petitioner can substantiate his plea by adducing other evidence. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:09.09.2011 GJ