IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.18 of 2011 Barho Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3/ 7.7.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who has filed the present application seeking special leave of the court to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sherghati in ComplaintCase no. 259 C of 2004 / Trial No. 134 of 2010 / 129 of 2011, the court finds that appropriate reasons have been assigned after proper appreciation of the evidence of witnesses. To cite a few illustrations, the complainant had put down the time of occurrence 12 A.M. but, the witness, as per him, who was accompanying him at the time of occurrence while he was returning from Sherghati Civil Court, like, P.W. 2, states as if the occurrence took place at 2 P.M. There is enmity admitted between the parties, so much so that P.W. 5 has stated that the complainant had been sent to prison after he was made an accused due to having assaulted the respondents of this case. Besides, there was a land dispute and a proceeding under 188 Cr.P.C. was also said to be drawn up. In this background, the court below had considered the evidence of each and every witness in accordance with law and has come to a conclusion that the story told by the witnesses as also by the complainant were not inspiring confidence of the court. 2 To remind myself about the principle of law as regards upsetting the order of acquittal, if two views are reasonably possible and one of the views, which has been taken by the court appears one of the two reasonable views, then order of acquittal has not to be disturbed. Going by that view, the court does not find any merit in the application seeking special leave to appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)