1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.181 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.180 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Shrihari P. Davare, J. Date : 07.04.2011. 1. Heard Shri R.D. Biradar, learned Advocate for the applicant and Shri M.L. Dharashive, learned Advocate for the respondent. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant (original complainant) for condonation of delay of 40 days caused in filing accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal. 3. Shri Dharashive, learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the present application, 2 vehemently, and submitted that the same bears no substance and, therefore, deserves to be rejected. 4. Considering the contents of the application and also considering the rival submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that delay has been explained by the applicant, satisfactorily. Moreover, said delay does not appear to be willful, deliberate or intentional, and hence, same deserves to be condoned, in the interest of justice. 5. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and delay of 40 days caused in filing accompanying application for leave to file appeal, stands condoned and present application stands disposed of, accordingly. pnd/criap-181.11 (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.)