,.,..^^^^ ^ \^-"f""^^\.^''"Y ,......-"* g-s;)"^3--" ^ ^3^d- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. AT - BILASPUR -^°—^F2^^6 ©jyjslong®ss^ ^ FIRSTAPPEALNO. APPELLANT ^' ,SI\4T. NEELAM BHATIA WIFE OF SATBEER SINGH BHATIA, AGED - 27 YEARS D/0 SARDAR KULBEER SINGH NIL.^MBER VIHAR, 40 BLOCKL N0. C, DUMDUM ROAD, KOLKATA, (W. B.) VERSUS RESPONDENT 7" .SATBEER SSNGH BHATEA SON OF TRILOCHAN SINGH BHATIA ,AGED - 27 YEARS JQ HIG - 75, MAHARANA PRATAP NAGAR, KORBA DISTRICT - KORBA (C. G.) .-<^_^ APPEAL UNDER SECTIQ11 - 19 t)F FAMILY COURT ACT. The appellartt most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under - 3ii^T ^T 'f^rNr 'cTm3^?^RN^ ^. ^'v\'\ Sahu -Y- (.^^ -s^ ^TpqMq, •^=rrarK?, t^Tray ...^.,^......../...-,....,.............^ ^QQ ^ ^?r ^^ (^f^-^?) ^prr^R''Rf^T ^t^r D.B. Hon»bleShri Justice N.K. Hoa^ble SJtoi Jystic OulaiilL^g^ywal & Miiahajuddixi, JJ. 22.06.a011 Shri Ravish Veraia, Advoc^te Shri Yogesh Paadey, Advoc^te Shri Veraia, leamed coui} subinits fhat he tried his level b4st dated 01.02.2011 but the appella^it In view of above, no opti^) disiniss the case for non coi^ipl 01.02.2011. Accordiagly, the appeal is court's order. No order as to costfe. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge -W4t^T^ ^M^ '^ 'feT<t 1:kT€K •^ for the appellant. for the respondent, sel appearing for the appellant for conipliance of court^s order is not responding. in is left with this coiirt but to lianice of court/s order dated dismissed for non compliance of Sd/- G. Minhajuddin , Judge |