IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16877 of 2008 Between: Smt. Noorjahan Begum W/o. Abdul Rahaman R/o. Sirpur (T) Village & Mandal, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tahsildar (.M.R.O.), Mandal Sirpur (T), Sirpur, Adilabad District. 2 The Sub - Collector, Asifabad Division, Asifabad, Adilabad District. 3 D.Sravan S/o0. Mukteshwar R/o. Sirpur (T), Adilabad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the intended proposals of the respondent No.1 & 2 herein deal with the 5acres of the petitioner's land in Sy.No.520 situated at Sirpur (T), Adilabad district to the respondent No.3 for re-assignment without passing any orders as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violating of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CHINDAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondents 1&2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition the petitioner is challenging the action of respondents 1 and 2 proposing to reassign the agricultural dry land which was assigned in her favour in the year 1999 admeasuring Ac.5.00 situated in Sy.No.520 of Sirpur (T) Village and Mandal, Adilabad District in favour of the 3rd respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the matter is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. It is the case of the petitioner that she was assigned the subject matter of land in the year 1999 by the then Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Sirpur (T) and since then she is in possession and enjoyment of the said land by cultivating soya bin crop. While so, the 3rd respondent stating that the Mandal Revenue Inspector, Sirpur has granted him patta for the said land, is carrying on bricks in the said land for making some construction over there by damaging the crop, and, therefore, she made an application on 19.7.2008 to the Tahsildar, Sirpur, the 1 st respondent herein to take necessary action against him but so far no action has been taken on the said representation and, therefore, she ﬁled the present writ petition seeking necessary directions to the 1st respondent. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner was granted patta for the subject matter of land and if the third parties are encroaching into her land, the petitioner has to approach competent court. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent is interfering with her possession of the subject matter of land by carrying bricks over there. The Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer has nothing to do with the said issue. If the 3rd respondent is interfering with the petitioner’s possession over the land without any authority, the petitioner has to approach the competent civil court and obtain necessary orders. This Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot direct the Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer to resolve the civil dispute between private parties. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE: 5.8.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Tahsildar (.M.R.O.), Mandal Sirpur (T), Sirpur, Adilabad District. 2 The Sub - Collector, Asifabad Division, Asifabad, Adilabad District. 3 2 CCs to Govt.Pleader for Roads & Building, High Court of A.P. Hyd. 4 2 CD copies.