HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WP. (3) No.7“339 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 Sukhdev' Khamhari S/o- Juru State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Schoo! Educatron, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (CE) District E&ucation Officer, District- Mahasamund (06.) Biock Education Officér,_ Biock ~ Saraipaii, District“ Mahasamund (6.6.) CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDiA Appearance: Shri F.S. Khare. counsei for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL CRDER (20.1 2.2%?) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Hcard. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale wet. the date of initial appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in 0A. No.2745/‘89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. and others), wherein, it was held that the simiiariy situated teachers are emitted to regular pay scaie wet. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’bie Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civii) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunai to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie from the date cf initial appointment. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTI Khamhari, aged about 57 years, Gccupation- Assistant Primary School Baradok Dist(ict- Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Cour, While considering the same issue in. Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No‘813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted reguiar pay scaie wef. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsei for the parties ioi‘ntiy submits that this case is ’ decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar squareiy covered by the Sahu and another (supra). in View of that, this petition is allowed in the same terms. However, this order shall be subject to ati verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge 7 vatti t