@ SINGLEBENCH IN THE HON»BLBHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(CINO. ^7h / 2011 PETITIONERS /' -.^^^ i^^" c^s^" ^ •^^ 1. Bhagirathi Shiksha and Sewa Samiti registered under the Provisions of 1973 Act having its registered office at Nagar Panchayat Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa Through - Its President Rajesh Mishra, S/o Mr.R.K.Mishra, Aged about 32 years, R/o Vinobha Nagar, Bilaspur-(C.G.) ^ 2. Lal Bahadur 'Shiksha Mahavidyalaya, Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa Through - Its Principal R.K.Kashyap S/o Shri R.L.Kashyap, Aged about 45 years R/o Deendayal colony, Qr.No.623, Mangla, Bilaspur-(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^T- The National Council For Teacher Education Through - The Member Secretary, National Council for Teacher Education, Hans Bhawan, Wing-II, Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, Near - R.T.O., New Delhi - 110 002 T^- The Regional Director Western Regional Committee, (W.R.C.) Manas Bhawan, Shyamala Hills, Bhopal, M.P.-462 002 73- The State Council of Educational Research 85 Training, Through : - Director, State Council of Educational Resarch 85 Training, B.T.I Campus, Shankar Nagar, Raipur-(C.G,) ^ 5) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCEOF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PRQHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER d^a 7- The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^57 GuruGhasi Das Central University, Through - Its REgistrar, Bilaspur- (C.G.) ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (O N0.4176 OF 201 1 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Bhagirathi Shikstia and Sewa Samiti &Another Versus The National Council For Teacher Education & Others (Writ Petition under Article226 ofthe Constitution of tndia) SingSe Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri SunSi CMwani, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate fbrthe respondent No.1 & 2. Shri Arun Sao, Govemment Advocate for the State. ORDER<ORAU (Pa$sedortthisQ2"dclayofAu9ust,2011) LM^o^. • • ...,,..,. .- ^ This ss an appiication fpr exem^jon ftrom filing type copy. Itis ordered as prayedfpr. Heard ieamed counsel appeannig forthe parties. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the peltftionere submits that the petitioners haye preferred an appeal on 12.05,2011 (Annexure P-7) against the orderdlated 3.5.2011 (Annexure P-^) before ttie respondent No.T. The appeal has not been consldered and decMed titl date. The petitjon^r institute is suffering on accountof non- decision oftheappeal. 2. Shri Pyasi, tearned counset appearing for the resppndenf No.1 & 2 submits that the statutoryperiod prescribed fordeciding the appeal Is three months under Ruie 11(4) of the National Council for Teacher Education Rutes, 1997. Hefyrthersubmitsthatstepswould be taken to decide the appeal atthe earliest. 3, In view of foregoing, it is directed that the respondent No.1 may decide the appeal as expeditiousiy as possible, so that if th® petitioners succeed, they may get advantage of counseling, which has aiready commenced from 1 st August, 2011 flll 8th Aygust, 2011. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^^