-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3839 OF 2005. Shriram G. Jaiswal. ..Petitioner. Versus Smt. Radhabai B. Vedant & Ors. ..Respondents. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : September 30, 2011. P. C. : 1. None appears for the petitioner. Perused the office submission dated 26/9/2011 and order dated 4/8/2011 passed by this Court. The cause title of the petition itself shows that Respondent nos. 1 & 2 are already dead and therefore they are not brought in the present writ petition. It further shows that respondent nos. 3 & 4 are not the contesting parties in the trial Court and therefore writ petition is not directed against them. In effect, therefore, writ petition is filed against respondent nos. 5 & 6. On 4/8/2011, this Court passed following order. “It appears that the Registry has been unable to serve the notice on the respondent nos.5 and 6. The advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that one final opportunity be given to him to comply with the office objections. At his request and as last chance, two week’s time is granted to do the needful. Liberty to serve srp -: 2 :- privately is also granted. If the service is not effected on the respondent no.5 and 6 within this period, the writ petition to stand dismissed as against the unserved respondents without any further reference to this Court.” 2. The petitioner could not comply with this conditional order, therefore, writ petition stood dismissed automatically as against respondent nos.5 & 6, same is accordingly disposed of as such. (RANJIT MORE, J.)