SBCWP No.6952/05. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6952/2005. Takht Singh Rathore Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order : September 25, 2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Dinesh Yadav for the petitioner. Shri B.L. Awasthi, Additional Government Counsel. **** BY THE COURT :- This writ petition has been filed with the grievance that respondents have illegally refused to the petitioner the right of consideration for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited attention of the court towards the letter dated 21/6/2005 which has been addressed by the Director Sainik Kalyan Vibhag, Rajasthan, Jaipur to the government inviting their attention to the fact that certificate of Unit Education Instructor Course imparted by the Military Education and Training College & Centre, Panchmadhi (M.P.) is equivalent to B.S.T.C. Certificate of Civilian Teacher. The government was therefore requested to pass appropriate orders by declaring it to be equivalent to B.S.T.C. Course so that the ex-servicemen may get benefit of employment in the education department of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the unit education instructor course has been treated equivalent to S.T.C. in the States of Himachal Pradesh, Madhya SBCWP No.6952/05. 2 Pradesh and Haryana but the State of Rajasthan has so far not taken any decision. Attention of the court was invited to a circular dated 31/1/2001 issued by the Direcor General Military Training (MP & Army Headquarter) addressed to all army commandants. This communication pertains to award of the aforesaid Diploma of Education Instructors Course and contains the syllabus thereof. 3) Respondents have opposed the writ petition and denied that certificate of Unit Education Instructor Course imparted by the Military Education and Training College & Centre, Panchmadhi (M.P.) is equivalent to B.S.T.C. Certificate of Civilian Teacher. 4) But, in the facts of the case, when the Director Sainik Kalyan Vibhag and Direcor General Military Training (MP & Army Headquarter) have recommended so and recommendations to this effect have also been adopted by the various State Governments as stated above, it is considered appropriate that petitioner makes a representation to the respondents giving out all those details. 5) Consequently, the respondents are directed to consider representation and take final view of the matter within three months from the date such representation along with copy of this order is produced before them. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil