IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 389 of 2007() ---------------------------- OPHMA.1811/2005 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- SIVANKUTTY, S/O.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, AGED 35, PULIMATH VEEDU, PADIKULAM, PULIMATH P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MURALEEDHARAN NAIR, S/O.APPUKUTTAN PILLAI, ARAPRA VEEDU, ELANPA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SHINA, D/O. KAMALA BAI AMMA, AGED 31, CHANDRA VILASOM, KANAL BHAVAN, NILAMEL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * C.M.Application No.1450 of 2007 and Mat.Appeal No.389 of 2007 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of May 2010 O R D E R & J U D G M E N T Basant,J This appeal filed in 2007 remains in the defect list even now for the reason that steps have not been taken to get service effected on the sole respondent. In spite of specific directions issued on 24/11/2009, no steps have been taken so far. There is no representation for the appellant today. Inference is irresistible that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. 2. In the result, this appeal and the application for condonation of delay are dismissed for non-prosecution. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge both in the application for condonation of delay and in the Mat.Appeal The learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to give notice to the learned counsel for the respondent who was appearing for the respondent before the court below.