IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2417 OF 2008 Shashi Gupta .. Petitioner Vs. The Union of India and another .. Respondents Mr. Mathows Nedumpara i/by Mr. Vikas Mahangare for the petitioner. Mr. D.A. Athavale with Mr. Rui Rodrigues for the respondent No.1. Mr. R.R. Gade i/by M/s. R.R. Gade & Associates for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ & S.A. BOBDE, J DATED : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the contentions raised in this writ petition before the appropriate forum in the pending appeal. He further says that he was always willing to argue the matter before the concerned authorities. However, relevant documents were not produced. This is disputed by the counsel for the respondents who states that the relevant documents have been annexed to the reply filed in response to the application of the petitioner. Be that as it may, we consider it totally improper to decide the same in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is disposed of. Liberty as prayed is granted. 2. The documents which the bank has relied upon for the purposes of holding the petitioner liable will be produced before the authorities concerned, if not already produced. Once these documents are produced on record and copies thereof are given to the petitioner, the question of inspection does not arise. Counsel for the petitioner also prays for leave to move the Appellate Authority for interim orders in the pending appeal. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J