HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr. ) N0.830I2011 PETITIONERS 1 RESPONDENTS Mallu Kewat, S/o Late Tangu Kewat, Aged about 70 years Bahuri Bai, W/o Mallu Kewat, Aged about 65 years Rajkumar Kewat, S/o Manu Kewat, Aged about 45 years Smt. Shivmati, W/o Rajkumar Kewat, Aged about 42 years Smt. Radha Bai, W70 Late Dil Santosh Aged about 31 years Umesh Kumar Kewat, S/o Rajkumar Kewat Aged about 19years. All residence of Vinage and Post Mallar, Tahsit Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Superintendent of Police, Bilaspour, District Biiaspur (C.G.) Collector, Bilaspur, District Biiaspur(C.G.) Station House Officer, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Vikram Singh, S/o Ramnath Singh, Aged about 28 years, R/o 27 Kholi, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Vikrant Singh S/o Shiv Singh Aged about 28 years, R/o Gram Newarl Post Mallhar Thana & Tehsii Masturi, District Bllaspur (C.G.) 2 WRIT PET!TION (Cr. ) NO.830I2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : None for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the state. e_# _ ...... ORAL ORDER (11.02.2011) y;” SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, even in two rounds, this Court is ieft with no other way except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- b