IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11447 of 2008. Decided on: 30.12.2010. Suman Kumari. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate, General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in CWP No. 2880 of 2010, titled as Dhananjay Saini versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 21.10.2010. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents-State to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No