IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24083 of 2008 ------ 1. SHANKAR DEO GUPTA @ SHANKAR DEV GUPTA 2. SHAMBHU PRASAD 3. ANIL PRASAD ……………………………………………………………..PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pipararhi P.S. Case No.100/2006 for the offences registered under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the allegation in the F.I.R. is absolutely incorrect and false since there was a family partition in the year 1978 and the land in question from where Shesham tree is alleged to have been taken by the petitioners did not belong to the informant. He further submitted that other co-accused persons having similar allegations to that of the petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail as per the order dated 20th November, 2007 passed in Cr.Misc. No.47417 of 2007 contained in Annexure 9. 2 Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that petitioner no.1 Shankar Deo Gupta @ Shankar Dev Gupta, petitioner no.2 Shambhu Prasad and petitioner no.3 Anil Prasad, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Pipararhi P.S. Case No.100/2006 (G.R. No.524/2006, Tr. No.1208/2007) within a period of four weeks, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistarate, Sheohar, Sitamarhi in connection with the aforesaid case, on the condition mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)