IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4217 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 09, 2011. Sohan Lal Tea Stall .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.J.J.Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated 9.7.2008 (Annexure P-1) calling upon him to explain the alleged illegal construction raised by him. The petitioner submitted his reply dated 17.7.2008 (Annexure P-2) and thereafter, no action appears to have been taken in the matter. The petitioner's grievance is that even without deciding his objections against the notice, the authorities of the Market Committee, Bilga, District Jalandhar, are harassing him. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views with regard to the legality of the construction raised by the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the C.W.P.No .4217 of 2011 2 same with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the reply/objections submitted by the petitioner to the show cause notice dated 9.7.2008, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Till then, no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 09, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE