1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4153/2009. Smt. Tulsabai Ramkrishna Manusmare and others -: versus :- Shri Sopal Ramrao Pathe Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 16, 2010. Heard Shri V.J. Dharkar, learned counsel for petitioners and Shri R.B. Mehadia, learned counsel for respondent. It is apparent that fact of sale dated 09.12.1970 was within the knowledge of petitioners/plaintiffs at the time of institution of the suit. In view of this position, the refusal to permit the amendment by Trial Court cannot be labeled as erroneous or perverse. The petitioner is given liberty to challenge the impugned order after final adjudication of the suit, if occasion therefor arises, as I am not inclined to interfere with the matter at this stage. Writ Petition is thus dismissed, with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.