IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16813 of 2007 AJAY PANDEY @ MITHILESH PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 10. 17.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the informant. This case was fixed for settlement of the dispute between husband and wife. During settlement it was agreed between the parties that the petitioner should provide some maintenance for his children. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready to transfer the land of Khesra No. 1142 having an area of 11 katha 14 dhurs which comes within his share. It is also submitted that copy of this supplementary affidavit was served on the counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party. It appears that opposite party is not satisfied with the offer made by the petitioner. The petitioner has remained in custody for about four and half months. Considering the aforesaid period of custody undergone by the petitioner, the provisional bail earlier granted to the petitioner is confirmed. Shageer (Sheema Ali Khan, J)