IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16301 of 2011 Dina Nath Pandit Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. The petitioner is husband of the deceased and he is languishing in jail custody since 07.05.2010. It is admitted case of the informant that he got telephonic message on 22.01.2010 to this effect that his daughter having burn injury had been admitted in NMCH. It is also an admitted case of the informant that having got the aforesaid information, he reached at NMCH and met with his daughter. It is alleged that his daughter disclosed that she was put on fire by her in-laws as well as petitioner. Admittedly, the deceased died on 15.02.2010 in course of her treatment and after that, the informant lodged the present case. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on 22.01.2010, the petitioner had given his fardbeyan disclosing this fact that the deceased was caught in fire accidentally, It is also contended by him that just after the above said incident, the deceased was taken to hospital by the petitioner and his other family members and also informed about the incident to the informant through telephone and thereafter, the informant came at NMCH on 2 the same day but he never lodged the case against the petitioner and his family members before the death of his daughter and nor disclosed this fact before any person that his daughter was burnt by the petitioner and his other family members. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Dina Nath Pandit be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Khajekala P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)