IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.708 of 2007 GYANESHWAR PRASAD S/O LATE UMA SHANKAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- SONATATH, P.S.- TOWN DARBHANGA, DISTRICT-DARBHANGA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DARBHANGA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,DARBHANGA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DARBHANGA. ----------- 8. 1.7.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the grievance, which has remained not redressed as yet, petitioner propose to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2. In case, such representation is filed giving the relevant details and the supporting papers, if any, along with certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks. The respondent no.2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised in this writ application in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months of receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, in case, any - 2 - N.H./ amount admissible and found payable, the same could be paid to the petitioner preferably within a period of three months thereafter. While making the payment, the authorities shall also consider with regard to the admissible interest payable on account of the delayed payment. This writ application is disposed of with the above observations and directions. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)