1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.33 OF 2006 Mr.Trilochan Singh Sachar and ors Petitioners Vs Gaganpreet Kaur and anr Respndents Mr Shriram Shirsat for the petitioners. Mr Bipin Joshi for respondent no.1. Ms M.M.Deshmiukh, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 8th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 8th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 8th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent no.1-original complainant have jointly requested to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.832/P/2000 pending against the petitioners on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court at Kurla, Mumbai. It appears that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and annexed a copy of the Consent Terms to the writ petition at Exhibit-B. Parties are present in the Court. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in B.S.Joshi and B.S.Joshi and B.S.Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Anr-(2003) 4 Supreme others Vs. State of Haryana and Anr-(2003) 4 Supreme others Vs. State of Haryana and Anr-(2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675 Court Cases 675 Court Cases 675, the criminal proceedings and the FIR under section 498A read with 34 of IPC are quashed. The petitioners are set at liberty. The undertakings 2 2 2 given by the parties in the Consent Terms at Exhibit-B filed before the Sessions Court are accepted. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy expedited. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)