HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR Petitionere 3. lofZOfiZ Sunder Lal Dewangan Age about 37 year, Astt. Teacher S/o shri Bhuwan Lal Dewangan Primary School Singdai Block Rajnandgaon Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C^3.) Dharmendra Lat Agrawal Age about 36 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Late Shri Shriram Agrawal Govt. Middte School Dewaribhat [Amalipar Khairagharh] Block - Rajnandgaon Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G^ -, Bhuwan Lal' Patel Age about 47 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Shivcharan Patel Govt. Primary School Bhodiya Block Rajnandgaon Distt. - Rajnandgaon <C.G.) ' :. Smt. Tumeswarislnrta Age about 37 year, Astt. Teacher W/o Shri Jeewan Lal Sinha govt. Girls Primary School Mohadr. Btock - Rajnandgaon Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department & Education DepartmantD.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. - Raipur (G.G.) Distt. Education Officer, Rajnahdgaon Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Astt. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Rajnandgaon Dlstrict - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Block Education Officer Rajnandgaon / Khairagarh Distriet - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Treasury, Accounts Raj'nandgaon District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) QWrit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Justice Satish K. Aanihotri Present : Shri Somkant Verma, coynsel for $he petitioriers. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. AdvocatefortheState/ respondents. iSiaStisasa, IR 2. 4. tndu tPassedon28tn.)une, The question sf law involvi^^hereiiT ijs^as^ to^ whether tbe petitioners are-errtitled to reguSr pay scaK^w.e^lsiKe date.of initia! appotntment or from tlie'date ofcgiitSptetiQ8^isK%obatJon period.. .': '^'.1..'' .S,._''^-'.3::1.- '.. ^'^..:S-:.3 ^•-'.^..•';--'.' Leamed counsel appearing^jfertfte petjtiQnejs^well as fpr^tiw State/respondents.jointly sybmif,ttiat.thie^^te?and questiQn^)f- iawinvolved in;th©preseni.wri{petitiQh,areiI&&-sanietoti'iatof in W.P. No.l'iBSQCUS (SeraaJTiteiaVs^TheStateSovemment of Chhattisgarh' & another), wllicB' was:;all6wed vide order dateri 10.11:.2QQ6.' . ":. . .„"?.:..;: .^.G:-:;._ . ' . ' ; However, ths^State govemment is at!jtoetty?t$?"verifythe appointmentQr4hepetitionersinordertttfiRd^^whethsrthe_- fact of the present case ar& identical-AQ^ttal ofM.P.(S5 No. 1463/2006 :<sttpra)"' • ' . ^. .^. . In view of the ahove-stated submissjons made'by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition-js aiiovi^d in the samg terms. No orderasto coste. , , - . 'y .jj : • Sd/- • Satish K. Agnihotri Judge !'..'$St:i^ •-^^i-iSi.iiES-1-