HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Surendm Pr'asad, 5 Shri Chandrabhanu, aged aouf 55 years, Assis’ran'r Teacher, Janpad Primary Schoo Lailunga, loc Lailunga, is‘rr'ic’r— Ragarh (6.6.) a 2. Daur'm Gupfa, S/o Lafe Shri Abhimm‘ Gupta, age abou’ 54 yrs, Assisfun’r Teaer unpad Primary School, Subra, Block- Lailunga, Disrric‘r- Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Chim‘a Ram Pa’rel, S/o Shri Malik Ram Paml, aged abou 54 year's, AssisTan’r Teacher, Governen’r Primary $chool, Kekrajria, Block— Lailunga, Disfric'r Raigarh .G.) . Benu Ram Gupi’ S/o Shr Dhani Ram Gupta, aged abouT 57 years, Assisfan‘r eacher, Governme‘ Primary School, Bhedimuda (B), lock- Lailunga, Districf— Raigarh (C.G.) Pe’ri’rions er Versus Responden’rs S’ra’re of Chha'rfrh, Through Secrefary Educa'rion Depar’rmem‘, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (C..) 2. Dis’rricf Education Offier, Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Blck Education Officer, Lailunga, isga , G c o District - Raiga (6.6.) rh SB: Hon‘bie Mr. Jutice s Satish K. Agnihotri, J ri Anil Moury, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh a iss Sunita Ja, Panel awyer for the respones. M in L dnt ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 17*” Day of June, 2008) 1. With the consent of Iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. / 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were appointed as Deputy Teacher on fixed pay scale of W. P.(5) No. 2918 of 2008 /0 b l; Bk- D i ch J d r ea ’ t m ha (C 4 a, i T nr B 3 I Rs. 10. Affer‘ complefion of probatién period, The efifinér‘s were ganted regular pay scale. He ur’rher submifs ’rha‘r fhe issue involved i Te case s asTo whe'rher The peTiTioers are enTiTied To regular pay scale .e.f. Te aTe of iniTial appoinTmenT or aer mplen of probaTion period. . The issue involved, herein was consiered y The Madhya Pradesh STaTe AinisTrTie ribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 275/89 (MadhukanT Yadu and 6 oThers Vs. STaTe f .P. (Si oThers), wherein iT as held ThaT The smilarly siuaTed Teae are enTiTled To regular pa scale w.e.. he daTe of iniTial appoinTmen T maTTer was Taken-up T The Hon ble Supreme Cor he appeal s imsed by The Hole Supre CourT upoling The eon o The Tbunal To The effecT ThaT The Tchers/AsnT Teachers are eniTled regular pay cale from The daTe of iniTil appoinTmenT. In view of Th above sTaTe submission made y learned counsel or The paTies, he wiT peiTion is disposed of n h sa Terms i., The eTiTioners are granTe Iiber To make a represenTaTion, if so advised, rTo consider Their caes, if They sTan on The same ooTings as r The , orer ‘daTed 248.1992 passed b The dhya Prade STaTe AdminisTraTive ribunal, abalpur, in O.A.N. 2745 of 89 (MahukanT Yadu) (supra) and ubeuely confirmed by The order daTed 3.1.1994 passed b The Hon’ble Supreme our in Special Leave eTiTin (Civil) y CT Po No. 68923 and granT reief accordingly. . view of The foregoing, Te peTiTion is ispose o. No order asTo In h dd f cosTs. Sd/- ’i Satlsh K Agnlhotrl Judge s’r"¥(~... _, _. 'Thakur 0/- po r f n h i n w h d fT coTio d b dmav T 4 5 o M w i T chrs y f T T he o uT T wa dsis nb em hd dcusi f rl easusTa T To s a . e s b f r T r T i Te me e. p d Ty s d f, pe d . y Ma sh T J o d ssqnT /9 l