IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.782 of 2010 RAJEEV KUMAR S/O NAND KISHORE SINGH, R/O B-170 P.C.COLONY, P.S. KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT- PATNA. --PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.SWETA DEVI, W/O RAJEEV KUMAR, LOHANIPUR, KADAM KUAN, PATNA. --OPP.PARTY 3 25-10-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this case, being husband of the informant, carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. It further appears that during the pendency of the case one petition for compromise was filed but, as submitted, it could not sustained and the wife left the house. Sole petitioner intends to resume and continue the marital life with the informant but no step towards the same appears taken. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of production of proof of filing application before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking restitution of 2 conjugal rights with an offer and undertaking to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand) per month towards ad- interim maintenance subject to any order of competent authority on the point and begin with the payment, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Kadamkuan P.S. Case no. 470 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation or one single default in payment, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad