IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6788 of 2010 1. NAGESHWAR BHINDWAR,s/o Late Chhutharu Bhindwar 2. Chandrakala Devi,w/o Nageshwar Bhindwar 3. Ajay Kumar Bhindwar @ Ajay Bhindwar,s/o Deonath Bhindwar 4. Shisupal Bhindwar,s/o Suryanarayan Bhindwar 5. Santosh Bhindwar,s/o Hari Narayan Bindwar 6. Dharampal Bhindwar,s/o Late Chhutharu Bhindwar 7. Surya Narayan Bhindwar,s/o Late Chhutharu Bihndwar 8. Deonath Bhindwar @ Devnarayan Bhindwar,s/o Late Chhutharu Bhindwar All resident of village-Parsabirbal, P.S.-Chhatapur,District-Supaul. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 12-04-2010 Heard Mr. Girjanandan Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chhatapur P.S.Case No.77 of 2009 dated 03-06-2009, registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is a case and counter case vide Annexures-1 and 2 respectively from both the sides. It is also submitted that the informant, Manish Kumar, and petitioner no.2, Chandrakala Devi, are employees of the same school and there are some dispute regarding payment of certain dues with the accused persons and for that reason some occurrence had taken place. It is also 2 submitted that offence under Sections 307 and 379 of the Penal Code are not applicable in the present case and other offences are minor and bailable one. Petitioners no.2 to 8 are said to be members of the mob and no specific allegation of assault has been made against them. Though petitioner no.1 is alleged to have assaulted by iron rod on the head of the informant, but no corresponding injury was found on his head. In the aforesaid background, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in the above noted case, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)