IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE NIENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.21554 of 2006 Between: Pathi Satyanarayana & others. … Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri P. Nagendra Reddy This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21554 of 2006 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 to 3 in not producing respondents 4 and 5 before the concerned Magistrate for recording their statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and subsequently trying to arrest the petitioners before recording their statements as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct respondents 1 to 3 to produce respondents 4 and 5 before the concerned Magistrate Court for recording their statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and till then not to arrest the petitioner in crime No.128/2006 on the file of Rudravaram Police Station in the interest of justice.” At the hearing, Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.27341 of 2006 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19.06.2009 ES