IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2011 / 5TH SRAVANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 577 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.242/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.S.LOOKOSE, S/O.SAMUEL, KADUNKAL HOUSE, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.RADHIKA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KRISHNAMMA (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER, HRM, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDUTHY BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.PULIKOOL ABUBACKER, SC, KSEB FOR R THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J. CHELAMESWAR, C.J & P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No. 577 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar, CJ. When the matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the respondent Sri.Pulikool Abubacker submitted that the judgment dated 3.9.2010 in W.A.No.242 of 2010 has since been complied with by the order of the respondent dated 22.3.2011, which is filed as Annexure R1(a) along with the statement filed on behalf of the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however submitted that though the abovementioned order confers some benefit on the petitioner, the judgment of this Court in W.A.No.242 of 2010 is not fully complied with and therefore, the learned counsel prays that the Contempt Case may be closed reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge Annexure R1(a) order in so far as it denies the grant of all the benefits going by the abovementioned judgment in the Writ Appeal. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is closed with liberty as prayed for. J.CHELAMESWAR, CHIEF JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE vgs