\.'^ COURT OF ^ CHH.4TTES6ARH AT BIL4SPUR i.1131/2005 ^Z^- : ^3/o ^ CORAM: Hon'ble Shri S.R.Nayak. Chief Justice & Hon'ble Shri D.R.Deshffiukh, J. Sirdhar Ram Sdiu, S/o Bhanu aged about 35 years, R/o vi P.0. Khapri, Tahisi and P.S. &urg(Ci5) t-f-'Ww it-i ^ Shon. tiistt. Respi "ts ./ •-.. •'l- 6. Fcghni Bai, W/o Late Punu Ram Sahu.aged about 35 yeo.rs. Maheswhari, b/o Late Punu Ram Sahu, aged about 17 years. A'tahesh, S/o Late Puhu Ram Sahu, aqed about 15 years. Tu!si Bai, D/o Late Punu Ram Sahu, aged about 13 years. Pushpa, &/o Late Punu Ram 5ahu, aged about 11 years. 6omti Bai, W/o Late Balmukund, aged about 70 ·yeo.rs. From the side of appellants No. 2-5 guardian .Mother-Smt Faghni Bai, AU resident of Viilage Bori, P.0. apri, Distt. Durg(C6) , Komal Ram Sahu, S/o Sudharshan ftam Sahu, aged about 23 years, R/o ViHcge Parsahi, P.0. Khapri, Rahsil Balod, distt. Shri N.S.&liurandar for the appellsnt. OR.4L ORDER (Passed on 15.2.2006) " ^ . The foltowing oral order of the Court was passed by S.R.NAYAK, C.J. —2-- — -2- An^ard 1. The award passed by the Coromissioner for Workmen Compensation is assailed oniy on the ground that there was no relationship of.emptoyer and employee between the appellant herein and the deceased Punu Ram. 2. We have perused the impugned award. Having perusei; particularly yAat is observed and concluded by the Commissioner i" par'agraphs 5 & 8, it cannot be said that factual findlng recorded by the Commissioner is perverse fo" want of legcl evidencs. We are satlsfied that the finding recorded by +he Commissioner for Workmen CorRpensation is b-ased on substanti'.'e legal evidence. Be that as it » rcay, this case does not involve any substantia! question of !aw. The point urged by the learned counsei "elates to appreciation of evidence and accepting the riva! pleas of the parties on merit. Looking from any ang'e, there is no merit En this appeal. It is csc.scrdingly disniissed. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judae