THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.923 OF 2006 DATE:03-02-2011 Between: M/s. SANA Educational Society, Rep. by Sri Abid Rasool Khan Hyderabad … Petitioner and The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal and Urban Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.923 OF 2006 ORDER: The petitioner has challenged the notification ORR No.207 published in the A.P. Gazette Extraordinary dated 14-12-2005 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, “the Act”) proposing to acquire the lands of the petitioner situated in Survey Nos.29-B and 31 situated at Kondlakoi Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal. 2. The petitioner, claiming to be a minority institution, states that for the purpose of establishing an Engineering College, one Shri Musthafa Abid Khan, S/o. Abid Rasul Khan gifted an extent of Ac.10- 02 guntas of land situated in Survey Nos.29-B and 31 of Kondlakoi Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in favour of the college. The said land was proposed to be acquired by means of issuing a notification for the purpose of formation of ‘Outer Ring Road’. Despite objections filed under Section 5A of the Act, as it was persisted for taking out the said land, the petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the said notification. 3. The 4th Respondent – Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) Unit-V, Outer Ring Road Project, has filed a counter, inter alia, stating that although the land was initially notified under Section 4(1) of the Act, later the said proposal was dropped and no part of the petitioner’s land in Survey No.29-B and 31 of Kondlakoi Village, Medchal Mandal has been acquired. The acquisition proceedings, including the award proceedings were concluded without acquiring the land of the petitioner and without there being any impact on the said land of the petitioner. 4. In view of the categorical statement made on behalf of the respondents that the proposal to acquire the petitioner’s land was dropped, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 03.02.2011 Ksm/Msr