IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 896 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: February 08, 2011 Harbans Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Ravinder Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 27.1.2011 (Annexure P1) passed by the trial court whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed by order. Arguments heard. The case was fixed for leading ex-parte evidence of the petitioner. However, it has been submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioner had taken the summons but the same could not be served due to the strike in the office of Sub Registrar West, Ludhiana. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to provide the petitioner three months to conclude his evidence failing which the evidence of the petitioner shall stand automatically closed. However, the court would provide assistance for service of the summons on the witnesses. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents as the respondents are already ex-parte before the trial court. February 08, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge