WP(C) 2973/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. J.I. Barbhuiya, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. Mr. M.R . Pathak, learned Standing Counsel appears for respondents 1 to 4. 2. The non-consideration of the Nam Doboka Mahammad Ali Baig M.E. Madrassa in Hajoi constituency of Nagaon District for the Government grant, envisaged f or recognized ventures Madrassa is the grievances of the petitioners school, whe re the petitioner No.1 is the functioning Headmaster. 3. The learned Counsel submits that the school in question was recognized a nd is deserving of the Government grant and yet other schools have been selected , by leaving out the petitioner school. 4. Mr. M.R. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel submits that financial assista nce for the venture schools are to be considered on the basis of the latest Gove rnment guidelines notified on 12.1.2011 and continuous recognition of the school is mandatory and there is no scope for any extraneous intervention in selection of venture schools as objective norms are prescribed for the purpose. According ly, the Departmental Counsel submits that direction can be given for considering the claim of the petitioner school in accordance with the guideline notified on 12.1.2011. 5. The petitioners are agreeable for a direction for consideration of their claim under the applicable guideline, as has been suggested by the Departmental Counsel. 6. In view of the above agreement, this case is disposed of at the Motion s tage with the direction to the respondents that Nam Doboka Mahammad Ali Baig M. E. Madrassa be considered for Government grant, along with others, in accordance with the recent guideline notified by the Government on 12.1.2011. 7. The case of the petitioner school may be considered when exercise for si milar schools is taken up by the respondents in the concerned area. It is ordere d accordingly.