THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.21145 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled challenging the order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 25.08.2008 under which the Certiﬁcate of Registration in favour of the petitioner-ﬁrm was cancelled in exercise of the power conferred under Clause 31(b) of the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985. Since against the impugned order an alternative remedy of Appeal is available under the statute, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of granting leave and liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy of Appeal. No costs. 26.09.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No: 21145 of 2008 Between: M/s. Maheswari Fertilizers Rep. by its Proprietor B.Siddareddy S/o. Pedda Sidda Reddy, R/o.D.No.6/405, Nandimandalam, Pendlimarri Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Fathemaidan, Abids, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Director of Agriculture (Regular) Kadapa District. 3 The Mandal Agriculture Officer, Pendlimarri Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 The District Collector, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ or order or orders or direction declaring the impugned orders passed by the 2nd respondent vide Memo ROC No.B/13/2008, dated 25.8.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of Fertilizers Control order 1985 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. U.SUMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: