^^r ^ ^^ ^.. "w^ ^^ ^. ^n^T^T'f^vbF WT^TT^T sti*iw 7o5T ^{WW^\, ff>T[\W\Q, [®l<ni'M^< *II*<CTI »*iici»•••••"""""•"—••"•"••••""•—•""""•^ 200 ^ff^f 'IPRr (yif^q^T) <s«ll<<R« a3TT^T GM^(<;l<iil 'RTR^Jf'? 'felst <P»l^l< ^3TfilH3^ST (Slnol®Bench; Hon'bte Mr. Justic®Dhirendra Mishra) W.PJ (s) No.5298/2008 (Petition U/A |226 of Constitution of India) Petitioner Vs. BSpunuc 1. 2. 3. 4. Prescnt: Mr. Devendra Potel. Advocate Mrs. Snita 6hai, Pcaiel L(B(»yep ^am Kumflr1 ©upta, S/o Late Shri icndra ©upta, cyed about 19 yecrs, ]€! Churkidih/ Post: Lanigaon, t>isn. ! (Chhatti^orh). State of Chhatti^erh, Throu9h the Secretcry, Department of Forest, Mantraloya, Dau Kalyan Singh G^iawan, Raipur (Chhattis9crh). Prjncipal Chief Comervator of Forest, Sar9ujo Circle, Anibikapur, District Surguya (Chhati^<rh). Conservator of Forest, Sarguja Forest Ar«i,Distt. Sirguja (Chhatis9crh). Divisional Forest Officer, North Sangqja Forest Board, Aniblkapur, District Surgiya (Chhatisgarh). :or the petitioner, For respondents. 22.9.2008 Heard. ^T^^ ^Z[ ^UII^, —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. XI-HC—78 ^TT^T ^TT f<4i4> TT8TT 37T^Tsn^i<=h ~3^r •^i^io^, yitii-M^Ko, fsicni'y^< HWW\ ^lNlch ^ 200 3^r Tra^> (i°ifi<s«^) ^fTW ^f^T 3:TT^T 2: 8y this petitiwi under petitioner Iws prayed for a di representatiwi for compassionot Undisputed facts are Raanchandra 6upta, who was wo\ No.4, died on 10.5.2002. appointment as per scheme becember, 2006 after ottaininj rejected vide order dated 13-7.; dflrt-e of birth of the petitioner 23.5.2006 i.e. after four yearsj [s not entitled After hearing leamed petH-ioner was minor at thetimji became eligible for per scheme of the appointment after a perjod of| Court there \s no illegatity orj interference and the petition Accordingly, the petitioi^ The for cwnpassioho-tle flppointment timle compassion^te Sovernmtnt I^T T7TT^if "^* fc^l ^fa^K '^^rRFr^TT^r AA-icte 226 of the Constitution of India, the i^ection to the respondents to consider his iot|e qipointment. Ithcrt- fort-her of the petitioner namely I'king as Forest 6uard under the respondent petitioner q»pli«i for compassKmocl'e the Stort-e 6ovemmerrt- in the month of the mojority. However, his application was »007(Annexure P-l) with on observation tho* (s 23.5.1988. as such, he dttained majority on lof the deort-h of his fother and therefore, he QS per scheme of fiovernment. co|jnsel for the parties and consklering tho* the of death of his fflcther in the year 2002, he appointment only aft'er four years and as he was nct entitled for compassionate four years, in the considered opiniwi of this infinnity in the impugn&d order warranting deswves to the dismisscd. is dismissed. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^v