1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.919 OF 2010 Ramchandra Nana Shinde ...Petitioner v/s The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents Mr S.G. Deshmukh i/b Mr R.A. Shelke for Petitioner. Mr S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R. JOSHI JJ. DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] The petitioner had approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal making grievance against the order terminating his services. The MAT disposed off his original application by order dated 9th March 2005, set aside the order terminating his services but granted liberty to the employer to continue departmental enquiry. The petitioner has filed this petition claiming a direction to the respondent No.2 not to hold departmental enquiry, grant permanency in service to the petitioner and pay full back wages. In our opinion, the petition is not only misconceived and misdirected but it is unnecessarily filed in this Court. For directing the respondent No.2 not to hold departmental enquiry, we will have to set aside the order passed by the MAT, that order has been passed in the year 205. A petition challenging that order cannot be entertained in the year 2010. If the petitioner was not aggrieved by that order when the order was made and he is aggrieved because that liberty is being 3 misused, then the remedy of the petitioner was to approach the MAT requesting to recall its order granting liberty. So far as other reliefs are concerned, those reliefs are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the MAT. Petition is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE A.R. JOSHI )