S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3475/97- Smt.Rukamani Bai vs. Asstt.Engineer & Ors. Order dt: 2/2/2009 1/2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3475/97 (Smt.Rukamani Bai vs. Asstt.Engineer & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER : 2/2/2009 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.D.K.Parihar, for the petitioner. None present for the respondent. 1. This writ petition is directed against the award of Industrial Tribunal dated 31/10/1996, whereby, Industrial Tribunal rejected the claim of petitioner workman and held that petitioner has not worked for more than 240 days in any one year prior to her termination from service w.e.f.1/7/1983. 2. The Industrial Tribunal in its award dated 30/10/1996 has given categorical finding that the petitioner Rukmani and Papudi were two different persons and petitioner could not take advantage of working days worked by Papudi as no evidence on record established that these were two names of the same person daughter of Bhuraji. The petitioner only worked for intermittent period between July, 1979 to January 1983 but in no single one year she had worked for more than 240 days and, therefore, question of compliance of Section 25 F of S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3475/97- Smt.Rukamani Bai vs. Asstt.Engineer & Ors. Order dt: 2/2/2009 2/2 the Industrial Disputes Act did not arise and her termination was not illegal. 3. Having gone through the impugned award, this Court finds no valid reason to interfere with the impugned award and the same contains finding of facts based on relevant evidence and, therefore, said findings cannot be said to be perverse in any manner. There is no force in the writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. Item no.s-9 baweja/-