IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R No. 6213 of 2002. Date of Decision: 18th December, 2008. Municipal Council, Sirsa ....Petitioner through Mr. Navin Mahajan, Advocate. Versus State of Haryana & Ors. Respondents through Mr. R.D.Sharma, Sr. DAG, Haryana. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This revision petition is preferred by the Municipal Council, Sirsa against the order dated 23.11.2002 [Annexure P-7] passed by learned Additional District Judge-cum-Executing Court, Sirsa whereby various properties owned by the petitioner – Judgment Debtor were ordered to be sold in order to satisfy the claim of the landowner, namely, respondent No. 3 in a land acquisition matter. The State of Haryana acquired the land for Municipal Council, Sirsa for establishment of an Auto Mobile market at Sirsa. The land was owned by the Punjab Wakf Board. It appears that over two crore rupees were to be paid as compensation to the Wakf Board. The non-payment of the said amount prompted the Executing Court to pass the aforementioned impugned order in an application under Order 21 Rule 11 CPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of this revision petition, a sum of Rs.1.5 crores was deposited on 1.10.2003 and another sum of Rs.56,65,858/- on 2.11.2004 in the Executing Court. He further states that in this manner, the entire claim of the landowner stands satisfied. That being so, the order dated 23.11.2002 is set aside as there is no legal necessity to sell the attached properties when the decree has already been satisfied. Disposed of as infructuous. December 18, 2008. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE