1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION (M) NO.84 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION (M) NO.84 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION (M) NO.84 OF 2006 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.98 OF 2005 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.98 OF 2005 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.98 OF 2005 Mrs.Medha Prakash Kamble ...Applicant Mrs.Medha Prakash Kamble ...Applicant Mrs.Medha Prakash Kamble ...Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. Prakash Vasant Kamble ...Respondent Prakash Vasant Kamble ...Respondent Prakash Vasant Kamble ...Respondent ----- ----- ----- Smt.I.M.Koparkar for Applicant Smt.I.M.Koparkar for Applicant Smt.I.M.Koparkar for Applicant Mr.Murlidhar Kale i/b. Mr.U.B.Nighot for Respondent Mr.Murlidhar Kale i/b. Mr.U.B.Nighot for Respondent Mr.Murlidhar Kale i/b. Mr.U.B.Nighot for Respondent CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 24TH APRIL, 2006 DATED: 24TH APRIL, 2006 DATED: 24TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. Considering 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. Considering 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. Considering the facts disclosed in the application sufficient the facts disclosed in the application sufficient the facts disclosed in the application sufficient cause being shown for absence of Advocate for the cause being shown for absence of Advocate for the cause being shown for absence of Advocate for the applicant when the appeal was dismissed on 27th March applicant when the appeal was dismissed on 27th March applicant when the appeal was dismissed on 27th March 2006, the application is allowed in terms of prayer 2006, the application is allowed in terms of prayer 2006, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 4(a). The Family Court Appeal No.98 of 2005 is clause 4(a). The Family Court Appeal No.98 of 2005 is clause 4(a). The Family Court Appeal No.98 of 2005 is restored and be fixed for hearing after vacation. restored and be fixed for hearing after vacation. restored and be fixed for hearing after vacation. 2. The application stand disposed of. 2. The application stand disposed of. 2. The application stand disposed of. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.)