sr^ "^^ ^ 'cs ff' 1%;S;^Z-^;^ 5''l^<': ^w ?.;'•" ^ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTiSOARH: BLLASPUR Writ Petition (S> No. 8163 of 2008 Smt. Kodia Bai, Wto. t-ate Rameshar Sahu, agsd about 60 yearSi R/o. Pandrikaia, P.0. Baldevpur, P.S. Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G). 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Uie Secretary, Public Works Dspartment, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) Superintendent Engineer, PWD Durg, Manda! Di'st - Durg. 3) Executive Engineer, PWD (E D"."slon OfRce, Khairagarh Rajnandgaon (CG). Dlstt. 4) Sub Divisiona! Officer, PVVD (B&R), Sub- Divjsion Offics, Khairagarh, Dist Rajnandgaon (CG). ^- r (Writ Petition under Articies 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri H.S. Ahluvrafia, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General forthe Stete. :th Passed on this 1S'" day ofSeptember, 2003$ With consent of iearned counsel aDDeari is heard finaliy. for the parties, the matter 2) This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retirai dues. 3) This Court, m the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath MandaS Vs. The StaSe of Chhattisgarh & ofhers) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the dlsputed qusstlon of facts were invoived. The Committee was constituted by ths State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and othsrs), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. —•'2- ^/' "<>--., No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandai (suora)) as submitted bv learned counsei aDDearina for the oarties. 4) This petition is accordingty disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, withm a period of 15 davs from the date of receiDt of a CODV of this order as well as a copy of the petition from the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shal! issue notice to the petitioner and ofRcers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shal] consider and pass order, in accordsnce with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the offices's concerned may file additional documents, if necessar^. The entire exereise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petittoner, be compieted wlthin a period of four nnonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5) The petitioner shall suppiy one compiete set of the pefition to the State counsel for transfemng the same to the Committee. 8) In case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionary dues, it Is not necessary to fiie a writ petition before ttiis Court directly. The representation/application can be moved before the Psnsion Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shal! not refuse to entertain the reprssentation/application, if so fiied directty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihptn Judge t-z)