IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1273 of 2008 AJAY KUMAR SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 24/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 8.11.2007 reverting him to the status of a daily wager after his regularization. It is the specific assertion of the petitioner in paragraphs-21 and 22 of the writ application on oath that no show cause notice was issued to him before issuance of the impugned order. Learned counsel for the State finds it difficult from the recital contained in the impugned order to satisfy this Court that a show cause notice was issued, much less of the reasons why the order of regularization was being withdrawn. The impugned order dated 8.11.2007 on both counts, whether it be violation of the principles of natural justice by failure to give a 2 show cause notice or whether it be violation of the other aspect of the natural justice to give reasons in the order, the order is clearly unsustainable in its present form. It is accordingly set aside, without prejudice to the rights of the respondents in accordance with law. The writ application is allowed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)