FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO. 30 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 30 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 30 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2003 ------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.G.Kudle for the petitioner Shri C.R.Sonawane AGP for State. Shri G.S.Kulkarni for Respdt.4. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 27TH JUNE,2006 27TH JUNE,2006 27TH JUNE,2006. P.C. 1. This Review Petition is directed against our order passed in writ petition No.1222/03 on 17th November 2003. According to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, certain factual errors have occured in the order and therefore the order is liable to be reviewed. The errors if any, are obviously an error of judgment and consequently, review is not the remedy. The proper remedy is to challenge the order in appropriate court. Hence review petition is rejected. ...