IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 332 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.36169/2010 Dated 01/02/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- BABY NAPPALLY, S/O.THE LATE SHRI.N.MANUEL PRESENTLY WORKING AS HEALTH SUPERVISOR, C.H.C.MUKKOM,KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- DR.K.T.RAMANI, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case (C) No. 332 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 31st day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of violation of Annexure III interim order in the writ petition, which reads thus: “There would be an interim order to the effect that until Ext. P1 final seniority list is changed by a process known to law, promotion to the post of Deputy District Education and Media Officer shall be strictly in accordance with Ext. P1 seniority list.” The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondent has not violated the said order insofar as no promotion has been effected of anybody. This is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. What he submits is that the promotion ought to have been made in accordance with Ext. P1 seniority list. Insofar as there is no direction in Annexure III order to make any promotion in accordance with Ext. P1 seniority list , I do not think that any proceedings are called for in this contempt case. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.