WPCRL No. 649 of 2010 With Stay App. No. 6339 / 10 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for respondents No. 1 and 2. Heard. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report dated 24.07.2010, lodged by respondent No. 3, which is registered as Crime No. 237 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 342, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, police station Kotwali Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners, who are mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the complainant, are innocent. They have falsely been implicated in the dowry harassment case. However, on going through the contents of the first information report, this Court finds that there are serious allegations against all the accused. With the first information report the complainant has filed the medical report. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case for interference with the investigation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners, namely Munni Devi, Krishan Singh, Arvind and Shital surrender before the court concerned, or arrested, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (St ay Application No. 6339 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 04.08.2010 HN