APPLN.3077-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 3077 OF 2010 Alisager @ Salim Bootwala ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. A. A. Udapuri & J. A. Udapuri i/b M/s. Udaipuri & Co., for the Applicant. Mr. J. P. Kharge, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Shaheen Khan Naqshandi, Syed Masoom, for Respondent No.2. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2010 P.C. 1. This criminal application has been filed by the applicant for quashing the criminal complaint filed by respondent No.2 herein, for the offence punishable under S. 498-A of I.P.Code. It is submitted that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and consent terms have been filed in the Family Court at Bandra. Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. She states that she has no objection if the criminal complaint filed APPLN.3077-10 - 2 - by her is quashed by this Court. Perusal of the consent terms, were filed by the parties in the Family Court at Bandra, reveals that respondent No.2 has agreed to give her no objection for quashing the criminal complaint. 2. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of - B. S. Joshi & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. [(2003) 4 S.C.C. 657], in my view, there is no reason to reason to refuse the prayer of quashing the complaint. Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is accordingly disposed of. Bail bonds furnished by the applicant in the criminal case in the trial Court stands discharged. [ V. M. KANADE J.]