IN THE rnsii COJET OF KARNATAA AT bANJ 2 bOE Dated the 26th day of May, 1998 BEFORE TrL. ItN’aE Mr. JUbTICE A.J. bVASxfiVA BTWE: . Kariyappa, Hindu, major, 5/0 xr. K. isredappa, resident of Viswa Rupini, Kanj unatt Extension, Millaghatta Chanrl left side, Shimoga .. P2TI2IONERS (By Sri Jaypee Associates) A N D 1, Tue tate of Karnataka by its Secretary, iusLng and Uroan Development Dept., h.. Bfllding, Bangmio.1, 2. The Cin, Shimoga Urban Developnt Autherity, Shimoga 0 *0 RCSPONPE’TS (Sti K.H. Japadeesh, Sen. for El) Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Cortitution of India pr 5 ying to isn the preliminar) notification d 0 ted 1Z-11—92 (vide: AnncLre-B) by responrent_2 an Ghe imugned final notificati n dated 21-5-94 (vide: Annemre-E) by resondent-1, This petition coming on fo oreliminary hearing this d9 j, after notice to RI, the Court nae the fol1oing;— g’ Pg Th It is awItte tht tha etitioner is only a tlder of an agreennt of sale executed by the1eev in xspect of certain lands, It is also dinitted that t petition filed by th original olmers in d,P.!o,l3323/95 challenging tt notifications iuipugned in this petitien has been dismissed. It is needless to state tht the 2etitioner, who is a holder of an agrseunt of sale is entitled only to claim conpensation and that he has no locus st 8 ndi to question the 1egaiit of the acqui sition proceedings. Even otheise, this petition is not a1ntainab1e in view of the dsmIssaI f the Writ petition filed by the venor of the petitioner. This çetition, therefore, fails nd ceo3inglj zje ted. - I - sm/O5Q638 \,