G3) %¢’ 0 ,U r? N THE HIGH CDURT {3F JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR£CHHAmSGARH) WRrr 951mm NG54H {20057 B‘HIGNER : y /Z) Gapat Prasad Txwari Sfe Madhav Prasad' 7:777 Tiwari mad abaut— 5? years Chain Dag Ehirttahare 510 Budham Ram ”if: ‘ Dimijahare Aged abaut ~50 yeam. Mahatmr La! Sahu 550 Ude Ram Sahu Aged abaut 53 years Sewak Ram Thakur Sit) Sadhu Ram Thaku Aged about 40 veal“; Mohan Das Mahant SIG Khikh Das Mahant‘l Aged abant 48 yams, Ram$h Kumar Dhmw Sfo Chaitu Ram Dhmw Agéti about 3Q yaam, K.R.Lahara Sfo KS'Lahare Agad abwt —53 years Gyan Chant! Pamyani 510 GP. Parpyani Aged absut 4B yeaws, A“ ate warkmg as Stha! Sahayak {Tune Keemr) at the Dfii-ie afAnubhagiya Adhikari, Bh’atapara Nagar‘NmnalfNol, Tah- Bhammra, Distt Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : REEFQNDENTS - : 1} /The state of Chhath‘sgarh Through : Engineer in Chief Office at CM! Lines Raipur, Digi- Raipur C.G (:hief Engineerehanka’r Nagarm Raipun Distt— RaieurLG. The Superintendeiwt Engineer, Imgafjén pepartment, EM! Unee Ramur. The Executive Engineer, Inigaeen Depattment., Qffice —~ Di§ent Divig'tm Ne3, Tilda , Disii — Raipur (C.G.}” ~ I P 4 The Eecrelaw£nance Denartment, D.K.S, Bhawar}, Raipur (3.6. 5) The Secremrwmgation Department, DKS, Bhawan, Raipur C.G. PET—{USN L§NDER ARTECLE 2‘25 3v. 22? OF THE CONSTUUHDN SF INDIA FGR ISSUANCE OF APPRSPRIATE WRHE DIRECTIDNS ANDICHQ ORDERS BETAILS GF THE PEHTI§N XI~HC—78 ‘EW,WI§,W v mam WWW WW§WW %aq%waa1%$r ‘ representation Mmmm 9.3.2005 Shri S. C. Verma,'( Ounsel for thr: p€titioners. ‘Shri U.N. S. Deo, State] respondents. Heard. Leamed 001111361 petitioners are Working the State. r He. submits that presently they Irrigation Department of are getting pay scale of FLS. 2750/- with increment of Rs. 70/— per annum. He further subiFnits that according to the new fixation of ' pay scale, they are entitled to get their salary in the pay scale of Rs. 4500-125-70‘00. V Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that presentlyithis petition may be disposed before respondent No.5, herein representation in the sti}: This limited pra§ er, made by learned counsel for the petitioners is not oppose by the State counsel. Government Advocate for the ‘for the petitioners submits that the as Sthal‘ Sahayak(’1‘ime Keeper) 1'11 the of with a liberty to the petitioners to file. a L the Secretaiyminance Department), and he may be directed to dispose of the ul‘ated period, prescribed by this Court. The prayer is allo .d. v WW w zoog" . mmmtrae) XI’-HC~78 mm w 200 ‘ 'x r