-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 1501 of 2006 in Review Petition (Stamp) No. 26678 of 2005 in Writ Petition No. 4276 of 2005 State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Applicants Versus Mayankumar Jaising Bhagat ... Respondent Mr. C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader, for the applicants. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar with Ms. Helen Mandlik for the respondent. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: JUNE 15, 2006 . P.C. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having perused the averments in the application, in our opinion, the applicants have sufficiently explained the delay in filing the Review Petition. Civil Application is made absolute accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. -2- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Review Petition (Stamp) No. 26678 of 2005 in Writ Petition No. 4276 of 2005 State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus Mayankumar Jaising Bhagat ... Respondent Mr. C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader, for the Petitioners. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar with Ms. Helen Mandlik for the respondent. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: JUNE 15, 2006 . P.C. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the petitioners have not made out any case for review. Review Petition being devoid of any merit is accordingly dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.