1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETN. NO.2682/2010 Abhimanyu D. Pachpor and others -vs- Malutai D. Warade and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Adv. Shri P.S. Patil for petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 21, 2010. 1) Heard Advocate Shri Patil. He contends that after examining the suit, as filed, direction to pay deficit court fee was issued and hence subsequent effort by amendment to avoid payment of that court fee is not justified. According to him, court fee is payable as on the date of filing and amendment is also being sought in a suit, which has been filed with all causes and prayers. 2) The respondent/plaintiff is sister, who has filed suit for partition and separate possession. After this order, she has given up her claim for entitlement to substantial portion of suit property. 3) Considering this position and in view of the liberal treatment given to ladies in the matter of payment of court fee, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Objections raised by Advocate Shri Patil is kept 2 open for consideration on merits in the Suit at final hearing. Petition is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Khunte