C'Ssifl'S '€, Sf0t!°v*k ^'!.i"t^^.'^. yt-^i^E'l (O c/Fi tf0 (2) THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARtLAT PETITIONER ^-l" <:^;. ;;-<>n\ ^. ^••'rf^'^-7" .^'•;' RESPONDENTS .-o J ,d11 ^ ^>^'€ ^ o' tOy ovy WRiT PETiTiON (S) N0.2-5 & /2QOQ=f- Bhukhan LalTiwari Age about 46 years, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Shri Rampyare Lal Tiwari Govt. Primary School, Ban Bhibhouri, Block - Tilda, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State Government ofChhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Distnct Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block Education Ofticer Tilda, Raipur (C.G.) ^ <<^ ^>.t<' %^ WRiT PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF LNDIA HISH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 298 of 2(K)7 Petitioner ; Bhukhan Lal Tiwari Versus Respondents ; State Sovemment of ChhattiS9arh and o't+iers SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish (C. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Ajay Shrivaslnva, Advocate for 1+ie petjtioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panet lawyer for the wspondents/State. ORDER (Passed on -rtiis 19th Dayof January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition is similar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State fiovemment of Chhattisgarh & otiiers), which was afiowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They -fzirther Submit that the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counselfor the parties, the writ petition is altowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur