1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.9368 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 M/s "Sri Thirumalai Industries", represented by its Proprietor,Mr.T.Srinivasan, S/o Late Thiruvenkatam,152, A, South Car Street, Thirupparankundram,Madurai-625 005. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Chief Engineer/Distribution, TANGEDCO Ltd.,(TNEB), Chennai South Region, 802, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 2. The Superintending Engineer, CEDC,Chengalpattu. 3. Sr. Resident Audit Officer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 802, Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondents PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order made in Lr.No.CED/CSR/EEP/AEEP1/F.P.O.No.09/09-10/D 336/2011, dated 25.07.2011 passed by the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner ... Mr.Pala Ramasamy For Respondents ... Mr.K.Mahendran Special Govt. Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order made in Lr.No.CED/CSR/EEP/AEEP1/F.P.O.No.09/09-10/D 336/2011, dated 25.07.2011 passed by the first respondent and quash the same. 2. Heard Mr.Pala Ramasamy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the Chief Engineer/Distribution, demanding certain amount. 5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the authority has not taken into consideration the Board Proceedings No.3 dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 12.02.2001. He pleads that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation to the authority and that this Court may direct them to consider this matter in the light of the Board proceedings. 6. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondents, if so he desires and as and when such representation is received by the respondents, the respondents are directed to consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioner's claim and the Authority shall decide the matter on its own merits. 7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1. The Chief Engineer/Distribution, TANGEDCO Ltd.,(TNEB),Chennai South Region, 802, Anna Salai,Chennai-600 002. 2. The Superintending Engineer, CEDC,Chengalpattu. 3. Sr. Resident Audit Officer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 802, Anna salai, Chennai-600 002. W.P.(MD)No.9368 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 22.08.2011 ssl PA/07.09.2011/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/