IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30227 of 2008 BIBI RAYEESA, wife of Md. Tabrej, r/o Vill. Bairiya, PS Narpatganj, District Araria Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.10.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the wife of brother of the husband of the complainant apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner stands in the position of a daughter-in-law herself like the complainant. She has been falsely implicated only because of her relationship by marriage to the husband of the complainant. There is no overt act attributed to her. This Court finds it difficult to appreciate the rejection of anticipatory bail of the petitioner by the court below even while it notices grant of anticipatory bail to other family members by this Court5. The only reason for rejection is that the husband has not been granted anticipatory bail., It is unfortunate that despite guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in 498A matters by the courts below, orders of the present nature, continue to be passed, refusing to accept responsibility for passing reasoned order on mechanical premises burdening this Court with unnecessary bail applications. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today when she shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Araria in Complaint Case No. 780C of 2007. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)