IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 19442 of 2006 Between: 1. Smt. K. Srivani, W/o. K. Venkat Rao, R/o. H.No. 6-12-24, Namdevwada, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 2 Smt. L. Chandrika, w/o. Krishna Mohan, R/o. Vinayaka Nagar, Housing Board Colony, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 3 Smt. M. Raukmini, W/o. Linga Reddy, R/o. Sayanna Compound, Namdevwada, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 4 Smt. D. Satyavathi, W/o. D. Nageswar Rao, R/o. Madavanagar, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. …. PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad. 2 The District Cooperative Officer, Nizamabad District Cooperative Office, Nizamabad. 3 The Chief Executive Officer/Person Incharge, The Indur Vanitha Cooperative Super Bazar, Nizamabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting the elections to the committee of the Indur Vanitha Cooperative Super Bazar, Nizamabad, as bad, illegal and against the Bye-laws of the society and the provisions of the A.P., Cooperative Societies, Act, 1964 and consequently direct the respondent to conduct the elections of the committee of Indur Vanitha Cooperative Super Bazar, Nizamabad forthwith, the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.N.MUKUNDA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for Respondent No.3: Mr.Ch.Janardhan Reddy The Court made the following : Order: Sri K.Mukunda Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA,J DATE:29.2.2008 msv