1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 26. CA/13576/2010 (PRABHAKAR VS. THE STATE) In WP/2489/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.Nandode, Adv., h/f Mrs.Ujwal Agrawal, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.Kadam, Adv., h/f Mr.K.J.Ghute Patil, Adv., for respondent no.4 & 5. Mr.M.P.Tripathi, Adv., for R.8. Mr V.G.Shelke, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:8/10/2010 1. Heard. The non removal of office objection in time resulted in petitioner facing dismissal of the writ petition by order dt. 13.1.2010. There is already delay of 202 days in making the application. The lapses on the part of the petitioner, apparently, are not deliberate and certainly are unintentional. The delay is condoned. The writ petition is restored to original position by recalling the order 2 dt.13.1.2010. The petitioner to pay costs of Rs.1,000/-. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/13576-10ca