IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1011 of 2006 SAYEEDA KHATOON Versus NAND KISHORE SAH & ORS ----------- 5. 21.10.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons mentioned in the impugned order this Court would not find any ground to interfere with the same. The eviction suit is of the year 1974 and that could not be kept pending on the ground of non-appearance of the defendants who infact did not choose to appear despite publication of notice in the newspaper. The court below has infact considered all aspects of the matter in correct perspective. Moreover when an earlier application of the same nature of one Md. Shoaib was rejected by the Court below, such order had been also confirmed by this Court by dismissing his civil revision application and thus there would be no justification in taking a different view while reconsidering the same issue in as much the petitioner, the sister of Md. Shoaib has an absolutely identical case. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. This civil revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)