1 (WP 916 and 917 of 2011) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 916 OF 2011 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 917 OF 2011 Milind Vasant Dhond & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. Warna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.K.S. Patil for Petitioners Mr.S.N. Bhosale – AGP for Respondent nos.2 and 3 Mr. Amit Borkar for Respondent No.1 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 1st March, 2011 P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents submits that the Petitioner has an alternate remedy to file a revision application before the Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, and unless he exhaust the same, available to him, he cannot come to this Court by filing a writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 (WP 916 and 917 of 2011) 2. In my view, there is some substance in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Respondents. Under section 154 of the Co-operative Societies Act, the Petitioner has a remedy to file a revision against the order passed by the Assistant Registrar under section 101 of the Co-operative Societies Act. The writ petition, therefore, is not maintainable. Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to exhaust the alternate remedy for filing a revision application under section 154 of the Co-operative Societies Act. (V.M. KANADE J.)