IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-46524 of 2007 Date of decision : 11.11.2010 Dr. Emma Chopra ...Petitioner versus Manoj A. Madnani ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Sagar, Advocate for the respondent. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties stated at the bar that since the main complaint has already been dismissed (in default) by the trial Court, so, the instant petition becomes infructuous. 2. In this view of the matter, the present petition is directed to be dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Needless to say, if the complaint is restored, then the petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh petition in this respect. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) November 11, 2010 Judge naresh.k