1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2009 (Abdul Rajjak Abdul Majid & Ors. vs. Abdul Rauf Abdul Gaffar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 25, 2009. Heard Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for the appellants. The challenge is to the concurrent judgments and decrees delivered by the Courts below. The case of the plaintiff was based upon oral partition and the defendant pointed out that there was in fact a registered partition dated 4.5.1958. The Courts have found that the plaintiff could not substantiate his case of oral partition and further concluded that the written partition vide Exh. 54 was produced in original before it and was established. They also found that said written partition was given effect to and was acted upon by the parties. The mutation entry No.4298 was filed vide Exh. 63 in connection with said said partition. It is, therefore, obvious that the concurrent application of mind is neither erroneous nor perverse. As no substantial question of law 2 arises in this Second, it is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.