IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5181 of 2008 Date of Decision: 03.09.2009 Gurbachan Singh and another ....Petitioners. Versus Jaspal Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. S.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondents. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral) In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the defendant-petitioners have impugned the order dated 14.08.2008 passed by the trial Court whereby an application filed by the petitioners to lead secondary evidence in the form of a letter dated 17.9.1983 addressed by an Advocate to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court informing him about a compromise and withdrawal of the decretal amount, and another document, i.e. the report of the official of this Court dated 04.10.1983 vide which that letter of the Advocate was proposed to be placed on the file of the Regular Second Appeal in the High Court, was dismissed. A perusal of the impugned order shows that it has been recorded that the contents of the two documents which were sought to Civil Revision No. 5181 of 2008 2 be produced on record by way of secondary evidence, could have been proved by other mode of proof. However, the aforesaid two documents, copies of which are attached as Annexures P1 and P2 along with this petition show that it is the only letter addressed by the Advocate to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) and another is the note put up by the official of this Court to place the said letter on record in the regular second appeal. No relevancy of the aforesaid documents with the controversy involved has been established. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that there is no illegality or perversity in the order impugned herein which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, finding no merit in the present revision petition, the same is hereby dismissed. September 03, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) seema/gbs JUDGE