IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2008 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1930 WA.No.339 of 2008 ----------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.No.559/2006 Dated 11/01/2006 .................... APPELLANTS: RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4:- ------------------------------------------------------ 1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM BSNL, KERALA CIRCLE, TRIVANDRUM - 695 033. 2. THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM BSNL TELECOM DISTRICT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TELECOM, BSNL, ATTINGAL. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.KESAVANKUTTY. RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1:- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. S.BABU, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.SRI.N.SEKHARA KURUP, TEMPORARY STATUS ATTAINED CASUAL LABOURER, O/O THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER TELECOM, BSNL, ATTINGAL, RESIDING AT "VILAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU", CHERUMANNOORKONAM, KARICHAYIL, ATTINGAL P.O. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS, SANCHAR BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.(DELETED) (THE NAME OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS DELETED AS PER ORDER ON I.A.NO.227/2008 DATED 24-3-2008) R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.A.SHAFIK THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 24/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.A.No.339 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 24th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties to the lis, the matter is taken up for final hearing. (2). The one and the only direction that was issued by the learned Single Judge while disposing of the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner was to consider the request of the petitioner for regularization of his service in accordance with law and with all sympathies, if possible. The appellants/respondents in the writ petition have already implemented the orders passed by the learned Single Judge by passing an order dated 5th January, 2008. If for any reason the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he will naturally question the same before appropriate Forum. In that view of the matter, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE MS