:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1763 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 1776 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.P.D.Dalvi, Adv. for the petitoners. None for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. This is not a fit case for interference under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inasmuch as, the Authorities want to satisfy themselves as to whether the petitioner has indeed purchased the entire land or portion thereof. Further, such of the portions as are earmarked for public use have been properly taken into consideration or :2: :2: :2: not, is subject to inquiry by the Authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Enquiry does not prejudice the petitioner’s case, inasmuch as, either in the pending civil suit or by instituting a substantive suit the petitioner can assert his right, title and interest in the subject immovable property or any portion thereof. Keeping all such remedies open, this petitions are disposed off. No costs. sd/- *****