smm § 3:354 1 @ (’ P Zm’b/L/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION 1S) No. 42-9 OF 2007 Government Servant Assistant Teacher at Govt. Primary School, Chhindauly, Block and District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS R‘ESP.%DENTS /1) State of C.G. through Secretary Department of School Education, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). /2) District Education Officer, District Mahasamund CG.) Bloek Education Officer, Block Bagbahra Distt Mahasamund {c.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Mahasamund and District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22g OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDI ‘K : C A PETITIONERS X1} Smt. Vina Sahu, W/o. Shri Ashok Kumar Ganjvi, aged about 34 years, Occupation—Govt. Servant, Assistant Teacher at Govt. Primary ' wW‘H School Kotanpali, Block Bagbahra and District Mahasamund \D\ 0.7”“ WM \)\@¢\§bry” 0x ($1.3 x" f :2) (C.G.). b Smt. " Ganga G1lahre, . W/o. Shr1 . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILAsPUR W, PJSI Ea 414 of 2007 Pe‘féfioners : Sa'fya Pmkash Verma aw o+hers Versus Respondeni's : Sfafe of Chhaf'risgarh and ofhers And w, P45} No, 429 of 2007 5B: Hon’ble Mr. Jus‘rice 5a+ish K. Agniho'fri. J Present Ms. Hamida Siddique, Advoca‘re for fhe pefi‘ricner-(s). Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Governmer‘if Advcca+e for ‘Hne respandenfs/ swfa. 0 R D E R (Passed on \‘his 23rd Day of January , 2007) 1. Leamed counse! appearing for 'i'he f§e+i+ioaers as we” as for We 5+a+e/responden+s joinHy submH fhai’ 'H1e fac+s af fhe presanf wrif pefi'fions are simShr‘ 1'0 fha'f' of Era W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwari and afhers vs. Sfa'fe Governmen+ of Chhaf-risgarh & ofhers), which was allowed Vida order- da'l‘ed 7,11.2G06. They furfher' submi+ fha‘l' fhe quesfion of iaw involved is aiso fhe same. . In View of fhe above-sfafed submission's made by ieamed counsel fer fhe par-fies, fhe wrif pe+§+i0n5 arg aHowed in farms af fhe order da-red 7.11.2906 pagsed by fhi's Courf in WP. (5.) No. 5976/2006 9i (Sushi! Tiwuri and ofhers vs. 5+a+e Governmenf of Chhaffisgarh :31 \3. A cooy of This order be ploced on record in ofher connecfed wrif ofhers). No order as +0 cosfs. 4 pefifion. Sdl— . Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 3 Thakur i i ‘ _ Peii‘rioners : Smi Vina Versus ResporiuJen'fs : Shfe of