T 8B ^) ^. //" tft IM THE ffl:GH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDlCATURE AT BILASPUR 'fl-RIT PETITION N0 1374/20D2 PETITIONER Lili Kujur w/o Late shri Arun Kujur eged about 40 years. R/o. village oirang. P.o« Gholeng. Distt. Jashpur Nagar (c.G«) VERSUS RESPONDENTS '^t. ?-^3^s'-< s (l) Munku Ram Sarthi s/o aged about 50 years 'oollscfcor' -Jashpur Nagar, Distt. iTashpur (CG) ':.-*":^A,.^'<'" ^-<' >.^o',"^c^'<>^" <>^^ndw^..®->'" ?<(:-'. ,..-• AS-" 2) State of chhattisgarh Through secoretory Home deportment, (3) Director General o£ polics P.H.S. Raipur. (4) Inspector Qeneral of police Bilaspur. (5) superintendent of Police Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur. (6) offiaer Incharge Pollce station uashpiir. \.'y PETITXON UNDER.ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE WNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANGE_ 0£,AgPROPRIATE_?iRXTS_0^ MANDAM]I^S J?I*L./->—~ JTt'^ Lt-i—i/u-n-m-^- :Si'..';^.. i';s''"i;;ls>« HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION NQ.13740F2002 , Lili Kujur Versus Munku Ram Sarthi & Others )n. •^!te (Writ petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate forthe respondent No.1. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 5th day ofJuly, 2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.557 of 2002 stands disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge