IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 431 OF 2005 COMMUNIDADE OF ASSAGAO REP.BY ITS SPECIAL ATTORNEY MR. CAJETAN RAPOSO, MOIRA,BARDEZ GOA. ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE SECRETARY(REVENUE) AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. G. Xettigar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. M. Salkar, Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. A. N. S. Lawande, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for the Respondent no.4. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for Respondent no.5. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 23rd June, 2009 P.C. The Mapusa Municipal Council as also learned Government Counsel state that as acquisition of site i.e. Assagao plateau is not possible, alternate site is already proposed and Government has initiated steps to acquire that site. 2. In view of this statement, the learned Counsel for petitioner states that, for the present, the grievances made by petitioner may not survive. However, he adds that long continuous use of Assagao plateau for indefinite period may not be legally possible and right of petitioner to object to the same should be left open. 3. Accordingly, the same is left open and, in view of the statement made, we dispose off the Petition as infructuous. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*