ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 7174 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 7174 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 7174 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.R.P.Walvekar for the Petitioners. Mr.S.D.Rairikar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 20th October, 2008. : 20th October, 2008. : 20th October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Petitioners have challenged the notification issued by the Respondent. The suit is at the stage of framing of issues. The challenge as already raised in the plaint, the Plaintiffs want to add more details to support their case. Therefore, at this stage, keeping all points open and as the challenge is to the government notification, I see there is no reason not to grant full opportunity to the plaintiff-Petitioner. 2. The Respondents are at liberty to ( 2 ) raise all the defence/pleas available under the law. 3. Taking all this into account, the amendment as claimed is granted subject to above observations. The Petition is, accordingly, allowed. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]