IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2008 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 660 of 2006(C) --------- ------------------------ PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. K.P.NARAYANAN, FULL TIME MENIAL, G.H.S. BANDADKA, BANDADKA P.O., CHENKALA (VIA), KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. K.KRISHNAN, FULL TIME MENIAL, G.H.S.RAVENESWAR, RAVANESWAR P.O., PALLIKKERE (VIA), KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. K.KARUNAKARAN, FULL TIME MENIAL, OFFICE OF THE A.E.O., CHITTARIKKAL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. K.NARAYANAN, FULL TIME MENIAL, OFFICE OF THE A.E.O., HOSDURG, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 5. P.SANTHAPPA NAIK, FULL TIME MENIAL, G.H.S.BANDADKA, BANDADKA P.O., CHENKALA (VIA), KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 6. P.GANGADHARAN, FULL TIME MENIAL, G.H.S.S.CHEEMENI, CHERUVATHOOR (VIA), KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 7. T.SANKARAN, FULL TIME MENIAL, OFFICE OF THE A.E.O., CHERUVATHOOR, CHERUVATHOOR P.O.,KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARAGOD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 660 of 2006(C) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 - A LIST SHOWING THE DATES OF APPOINTMENT OF A PETITIONERS AS PART TIME AND FULL TIME MENIALS IN THE CONTIGENT SERVICE. EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. 6133.N 3/2000/G.EDN. DATED 25.3.2000. // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE rhs KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.660 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 18th December, 2008. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer :- “ Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ direction to the respondents to grant time bound higher grade to the petitioners reckoning their part-time service also.” Since the petitioners have sought for a writ of mandamus, it is for them to approach the second respondent. In the event of the petitioners approaching the second respondent within two months from today, their grievance will be duly considered and appropriate orders in accordance with law with notice to the petitioners will be passed within another four months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.660 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 18th December, 2008.