IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1898 of 2009 1. Amit Kumar Keshri son of Gopal Prasad Keshri R/o Mohalla Marwari Bazar, P.S and District Samastipur, District Muzaffarpur …..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Rita Devi wife of Late Diesh Das and daughter of Devki DasR/o Mohalla Bahadupur, P.S. and District Samastipur 3. Ankit Kumar son of late Dinesh Das R/o Mohalla Bahadurpur, P.S and Distirict Samastipur….Opposite parties. ---------------- 3 13.12.2011 The husband petitioner has preferred this revision petition under section 19(4) of the Family Court Act against the judgment and order dated Ist September 2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court in Maintenance Case no. 8 /189 of 2003/2005 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2000/- to the O.P. nos.2 and 3 who are wife and minor son for their maintenance @ Rs. 1000/- each per month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State and perused the impugned order. It appears that the learned principal Judge has considered the case of both the parties and their evidence adduced in their favour and has come to the finding that the O.P. nos. 2 and 3 are the wife and minor son of the petitioner. They have no means to support themselves whereas the petitioner has means to maintain them which is being refused by the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed. M.Rahman/ (AmareshKumar Lal, J) 2 M.Rahman