IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.16355 of 2009 Between: Gantipalli Danayya. … Petitioner And The Circle Inspector of Police, New Port Police Station and four others. … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.16355 OF 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1, 2 and 4 in interfering with the construction activity of the petitioner’s house in Plot No.965 measuring 160 sq.yds., situated in S.No.153, 155, 274 at Yethapalem Layout, Dibbapalem R.H.Colony, Pedagantyada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and for a consequential direction directing respondents 1, 2 and 5 to grant protection in construction of house in the petitioner’s plot. 2. This Court while issuing rule nisi was pleased to direct the respondents-officials to proceed with the investigation into the crime registered, but however, the said investigation shall not come in the way of construction of house by the petitioner. Despite the said order, as the members of 4th respondent are interfering with the peaceful possession, the petitioner approached the respondents and gave a representation on 13.10.2009 requesting them to provide required police protection and as the police have not initiated any action, the petitioner again approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 3. Heard both the learned counsel. 4. Having regard to the fact that the application seeking police protection was given by the petitioner on 13.10.2009, this court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the respondents-authorities particularly the Commissioner of Police–5th respondent, to complete the investigation. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents-authorities particularly the Commissioner of Police-5th respondent, to look into the said representation and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. _____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J. 25th November 2009. lmv