IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28453 of 2009 Rajesh Ranjan Poddar Versus State Of Bihar Thru.Vig. ---------- 02/ 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Vigilance. At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that trial of the petitioner is in full swing and up till now four to five prosecution witnesses have already been examined. It is pointed out by him that the petitioner had filed a petition before the learned court below under section 207 of the Cr.P.C as only part police papers had been supplied to him but without disposing off the aforesaid petition, the learned court below framed charges against the petitioner and started recording evidences of the prosecution witnesses. He also submitted that no doubt, the aforesaid petition has become infructous but the petitioner should be permitted to raise above stated point at appropriate stage of trial. Leaned counsel for the Vigilance submitted that there is no need to give any observation because the petitioner has every right to raise legal point at any stage of the trial. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to him to raise above stated point at the appropriate stage. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to raise his plea at appropriate stage. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)