THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.4486 of 2009 Date: 18-9-2009 Between Garapati Haranath … Petitioner/ Respondent No.1/ Defendant No.1 and 1. Garapati Naveen … Respondent No.1/ Petitioner Plaintiff 2. Garapati Rakesh … Respondent No.2/ Respondent No.2/ Defendant No.2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.4486 of 2009 Oral Order: Heard Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This civil revision petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 02-7-2009, in I.A.No.589 of 2009 in O.S.No.1083 of 2007, passed by the V Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Vijayawada, Krishna district permitting the plaintiff for adducing further evidence. 3. The petitioner herein is defendant No.1, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent No.2 is defendant No.2 in the suit before the trial Court. 4. The grievance in this revision is that the interlocutory application filed by the plaintiff to reopen the suit proceedings for the purpose of examining his maternal grandmother was ordered and the matter was reopened for that purpose. 5. When the very purpose of filing the interlocutory application was to reopen the matter to examine the maternal grandmother of the plaintiff, it is needless to mention that the trial Court examined the proceedings only for that limited purpose of examining the person, who was sought to be examined i.e., no other than the plaintiff’s maternal grandmother. 6. For the foregoing, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. 7. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, subject to the above observation. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 18th September, 2009. Ak