IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11363 of 2011-G Date of decision: 22.12.2011 1. Sh. Diwan Chand son of Sh. Hajmat Ram, resident of village Barigumanu, P.O. Gumanu, Tehsil and Distt. Mandi, H.P., presently serving as a T/Mate in HPSEB Ltd. Division Mandi, H.P. 2. Sh. Bhup Singh son of Sh. Puran Chand, resident of Village Thailer, P.O. Mathu, Tehsil and Distt. Mandi, H.P., presently serving as a T-Mate in HPSEB Ltd. Division Mandi, H.P. 3. Sh. Parma Nand son of Sh. Nihal Singh, resident of Village Thailer, P.O. Marathu, Tehsil and Distt. Mandi, H.P. presently serving as a T-Mate in HPSEB Ltd. Division Mandi, H.P. 4. Sh. Umesh Vaidya s/o Shri Bhup Singh Vaidya, resident of Mandi, Tehsil and Distt. Mandi, H.P. presently serving as a T-Mate in HPSEB Ltd. Division, Mandi, H.P. ...Petitioners. Versus 1. The HPSEB Limited through its Chief Executive Officer- cum-Secretary, with Headquarter at Shimla. 2. The Executive Engineer, HPSEB Limited Division Mandi, Distt. Mandi, H.P. 3. The Executive Engineer, Hydle Investigation Division Largi, Distt. Mandi, H.P. ...Respondents. Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. _____________________________________________________ __________ Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral ) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- -2- “ The respondents may be ordered to pay to the petitioners statutory bonus at the rate of 8.33% of their annual wages from the dates of their initial engagement on daily wage basis till their services were regularized with 9% interest thereon.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered by Annexure P-1, judgment of this court, dated 4.8.2010, passed in LPA No. 92 of 2009. There will be a direction to the respondents to take appropriate action in the matter in the light of Annexure P-1 judgment, referred to above, in case the petitioners are also similarly situated, within a period of four months from the production of copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2011 (Bhupender/Kalpana)I