AB 1070/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C. R. SARMA Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Al so heard Mr. K.Munir, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. This is an application filed under Section 438 IPC seeking pre-arrest ba il in favour of (1) Sri Hemendra Kumar Gogoi, (2) Mrs. Ranuprova Buragohain and (3) Sri Himangshu Raj Gogoi in connection with Barbaruah PS case No. 52/2011 und er Section 406/417 IPC. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted th at the petitioners No. 1 & 3 are State Govt. employees and petitioner No.2 is a bank employee. The allegation made by the informant of this case as revealed from the F IR is that on 22.9.2010, the marriage of the daughter of the informant was settl ed with the petitioner No.3 in presence of the petitioners No. 1 & 2 and accordi ngly the Ring Ceremony was performed. As alleged by the informant, subsequent to the said Ring Ceremony, the p etitioners refused to marry the daughter of the informant and thus cheated the d aughter of the informant and other members of the family of the informant. Considering the entire aspect of the matter and the nature of the allega tion brought against the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the release of the petitioners on bail, will not adversely affect the investigation, inasmuch as, their custodial interrogation is not necessary. In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners in connection with the above mentioned case, the arresting autho rity shall release them on bail of Rs. 10,000/- each with one surety of like amo unt to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. Bail application is disposed of.