IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 6‘25 W.P.(S) No. .......... of2010 V Pramod Kumar Oraon, S/o Sahju Ram Patel, aged about 32 years, R/o Village Gadha Gamharia, Post— Gamharia, Distt— Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER Versus /V l. State of Chhattisgarh through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Jashpur Nagar, Distt— Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. .u' 2. Block Education Officer, Jashpur Nagar, Distt— Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS N WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH C01 IRT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT EH ,ASPI IR WRIT PETH‘ION (S) No, 62.55 0f20 10 g; Pramod Kumar Oman) VER SI J'S RESPONDENTS : Staie of Chhaitiggarh & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF ”II-1E CONSTITUTION OF mDlA SB: Hon’ble Sim Satlsh K. Agmhntm J. Present: Shri Sameer Kujur, Advocate fer the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respotldents. ORDER gORAL) (Passed an 11 day 0f Camber, 201 1 J 1, Leamed‘cmmsel apyearing for the State submits that me petitioner has already continued at the nriginal place of posting for almost. one year on accmmt of interim order granted by this Court 28‘102010. The State may be granted liberty to pass appropriate oréem keeping in View public interest. and admim'straiive exigency, Shri Thakur further submits that the State shall not: insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated and 31.08.2(J10 (Annexme P/l) in respect ofthe petitioner: 2. At. this stage; when no effect could. be given to the impugmd order dated 31.H8.2010 (Ahnexnre P/l) on account of the interim order dated 28,102010, thuss it. is not necessary to go into legality and vaiidity of the aforestated impugied order. 3, In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordinglya the petition stands disposed oi: No order asto costs,IT ” Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 3 sw-