IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-6013 OF 2008 Date of Decision : 11-3-2008 Hira Lal ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Mukesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate RAJESH BINDAL J (ORAL) This is a petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent Nos. 2 to 7 by this Court on the allegations that respondent Nos. 2 to 7 have mis-lead this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents had cheated the petitioner by selling the property of which they were not the owners. The anticipatory bail granted to the respondents was confirmed by this Court on the statement of the prosecution that the respondent Nos. 2 to 7 had already joined investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required. As far as ownership of property is concerned the same is matter of record. There are no allegations that the respondents have in any manner, misused the concession of bail. In my opinion, no case for cancellation of anticipatory bail is made out. The petition is dismissed. March 11, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) rekha Judge