IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10844 of 2004 Between: Thotamsetty Sree Ramulu, S/o. Venkatasubbaiah, Obula Reddy Palli Village, Talupala Mandal Kadiri Taluq, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Manager, Andhra Bank Branch Office, Talupala, Talupala Mandal Anantapur District. 2 The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office Andhra Bank Kurnool Kurnool District. 3 The Chief Manager, Andhra Bank New Town, Ananthapur Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not releasing the loan a sum of Rs.1,44,000/- sanctioned by the 2nd respondent by his proceedings dated 1-6-2004 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to release the loan amount of Rs.1,44,000/- sanctioned by the 2nd respondent by his proceedings dated 1-6-2004 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.R.REDDY KOVVURI, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: MR.N.RAMA MOHAN RAO (SC) The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, aggrieved by non-release of the sanctioned loan to an extent of Rs.1,44,000/- for purchase of Motor and for laying Pipelines for agricultural purpose. 2. According to the petitioner, he made an application for grant of loan of Rs.1,44,000/- which is stated to be the cost of the motor to be installed in his agricultural land and also for laying pipelines. On the application forwarded by the first respondent, the second respondent-Bank has already sanctioned the loan. But, however, on some allegations against the petitioner, the first respondent is not releasing the said loan amount. Hence, the petitioner has come with the present writ petition. 3. When this matter came up for admission on 30.06.2004, while ordering notice before admission, the respondents were directed to get instructions. But, however, none appeared today when the matter is listed for admission. 4. Under the above circumstances, the first respondent is directed to release the loan amount to the petitioner, if sufficient security is provided for the above loan amount within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________ 8-07-2004. Note: Furnish CC in two days (B/O) ES/VGB To 1 The Manager, Andhra Bank Branch Office, Talupala, Talupala Mandal Anantapur District. 2 The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office Andhra Bank Kurnool Kurnool District. 3 The Chief Manager, Andhra Bank New Town, Ananthapur Ananthapur District. 4. 2 CD copies.