7 ^. WBi»""i CF0000058987' ^ t^ c- Father<s Name ^a S-SsaS' Sentenced to /- APPfiiAl 0"' PKEgCN'!!H -/ Bame ~^^\<3 .S.S^f ^ Residence' Di 's\^\r ^ar;; c:^^T«Xin—SiiTOSCl <ff • o" ^7-7- 1"i- TJnder $ ction-:3-^2.T-? c • tpy ^sy--v\'m o Ln ''r^'rt'^C. S,T. .^.- [SgA/^. It is explained to the'-prisonel- fhat if^6'statss or lisheg to be represeEted by a legalpractitior.er the Appellate Court will not'prodeed with the basa for s'even days unless the legal practitibner app.ssrs. If the legal practitioBer does nct appear •uith in sevai days hs may be haard at all if the prisocer states that he does not wish to be represaated by legal practi-oner the court aay proceed at once T4.th the case and Tid.il not be obltged to gi.ve a hearing to aiiy legal practi- tionsr who ahould appear. 1. Da'fcs 6f sppILcatioB for copy of Ju.lgement ;- 2. Date of whichdopy received ;- 2-7-7-?^- 3, Date ori which ^peal.sent ;- ^<./^.7.-p^ yS/ r~ No. -32<^S-~ Name ~^g^^lSl__M°L 4. whether. the prisaier wiahed to be represented of no'fc. ^>s Continued in 7YW^ i'7 7/^LJaii aaeLl p^-^Y N•0. /2 7 yfco c-7Le<5^ \\. Oated £-.9 ' 7 - 9 ,<^_ Forwarded to the CHI®'JtrDICTAI MAGIgTOATS ]^=?g-clp. t g^V'i'., togather wifch £ copy of;judgement or ol'dsr paased in 'y " csee for favour of transmissibn to the. proper Appiy.a'ts GO^- giperint Oate of receipt In CiJ.M's Office. Date of rsceipt of record to sccompany. •3!E>')y(^/ Memo of Appeal of •fehe.^pelliate Court. Wo. Oated. ^tt./ porwarded to the „ 2&JSS;i<9^ .Tt'^M.^O<< C.J'.Magl.strste. -t. V TPTpn^TTT^P ^B^ •^ii^irt«,u-al'<-i<id,feirti<('iy'< .c^..t..^o1>.l^ an^si iraq? (ijcitjci^) 3TR?T!ETRRfcp ni'.iTsn^iiTaitfrai ®'Rll8Rwft?rail^si <t»i<<[o<i1i*ii*ic'ii'^''l«l<3<Ri'(i;R ^igrf^Tsii^si Divisjon Bench: Hon'bie Shri Fakhruddin, j& Hon'bie Shri Dilip Deshmukh 26-u7-2u05 None appears for the aplpeiiant Shri J.D. Bajpai, Govt.l and Shri RavindraAgrawai, Heard. Learned State counsei Ganga has been granted independence Day and reiea^i 15-8-2000. .When the case is ca| counsei is present. it is indica^ive not interested in pursuing his In the above the Apex Court rendered in th^ Others vs. State of Bihar Advocate/Addl. Public Prosecutor Lawyerforthe State. Pahe Isubmits that the appeiiant Pusami |special reprieve on the eve of jed from Centrai Jail, Jagdalpur on |ied neither the appeiiant nor his of the fact that the appeiiant is appeai any more. and in the iight of decision of case of Ram Naresh Yadav and circumstahces r^ported in AiR 1987 SC 1500, the appeal is di^missed for non-pr<jisecution Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^^rw