IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.197 of 2011 Date of decision : June 28, 2011 Saukat Ali Khan @ Baba Sahib Gaikwad …Petitioner. Versus Dr. Naveen Kumar Sharma and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents : None. Deepak Gupta, Judge(Oral) This petition is totally without merit. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of amount, alleging that the defendants, in connivance with each other, assured the plaintiff that his daughter would be admitted to the Medical College and the amount was paid to defendants No.1 and 3. The assurance was also given by defendant No.2. 2. Defendant No.2 moved an application that his name be struck off from the array of the defendants, on the ground that there is no allegation that any amount was paid to him. 3. I have gone through the entire plaint. The gist of the plaint is that all the defendants were conniving with each other and cheating the public by assuring that their children would be got admitted in the Medical Colleges. At this stage, I do not want to go into the merits of the case, Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… but a reading of the plaint discloses a cause of action to sue against the petitioner-defendant No.2. Therefore, there being no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. Pending applications also stand disposed of. June 28, 2011(sd) ( Deepak Gupta ), J