HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3810 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 1.06.2011 passed in I.A.No. 1185 of 2010 in O.S.No. 3117 of 2009 by the VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Petitioner herein is the plaintiff. He filed suit viz., O.S.No. 3117 of 2009 for cancellation of decree dated 17.7.2006 in O.S.No. 3278 of 2005 on the file of VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and delivery of possession with consequential perpetual injunction. Petitioner herein also filed I.A.No. 1185 of 2010 under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC to implead the proposed parties as defendants 4 and 5 in the suit and in the I.As. The Court below dismissed the I.A holding that without the proposed parties being impleaded also, the issue in the suit can be effectively adjudicated upon. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Court below committed an error in dismissing the petition, as the impleadment of the proposed parties as defendants to the suit is necessary for proper adjudication of the issues involved in the suit. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the material made available on record. The Court has to see before impleading any party to the suit whether the presence of such party is necessary for effective and complete adjudication of all the questions involved in the suit and whether without such presence, the questions involved in the matter cannot be completely decided. The Court below thought it fit that without proposed parties being impleaded also, the issue in the suit can be effectively adjudicated upon and rightly dismissed the I.A., considering the circumstances of the case. In view of the above, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the Court below and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 23.09.2011 KA