IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12973 of 2009 ANAND MOHAN Versus THE PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS With CWJC No.12974 of 2009 ZEYA AHMAD Versus THE PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS With CWJC No.13047 of 2009 NIRAJ KUMAR Versus THE PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 2. 9.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners in this writ application stating that they passed the Master of Finance and Control Part-I examination. They then cleared the second part also. But when the second part results were declared they were shown not to have passed one of the papers of the first year which earlier they were declared to have passed. No orders are possible at this stage with requiring the University to file counter affidavit. At this stage, learned counsel for the University submits that by a notification nos. A.C/L.C./341 and A.C./L.C./342 dated 12.2.2007 student cell has been constituted by the order of the Chancellor for consideration of such grievance, if petitioners file a representation it shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 2 The writ application is disposed with the direction that if the petitioners file a representation before the student cell, the same shall be considered and disposed off by reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt and presentation of the same considering the urgency of the matter as it involves the academic career of the petitioners. The writ application stands disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)