IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2450 of 2010 1. DINESH CHAUPAL, son of Hare Ram Chaupal, resident of village Ufraul, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District Darbhanga 2. Amrika Kumari @ Amirka Kumari, D/o Hare Ram Chaupal, wife of Indal Chaupal, resident of village Ufraul, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District Darbhanga, presently resident of village Mahrajpur, P.S. Kusheshwar Asthan, District Darbhanga Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.2.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with an offence under section 302 and other allied offences of the Indian Penal Code. Their explanation is that in fact some of the accused have already faced trial in connection with the present case and they have also been acquitted. Further submission is that petitioner no.2 is a lady. Normally this Court would not be inclined to even consider the prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with an offence of the year 2004 but taking into the fact that petitioner no.2 is a lady, this Court would direct that if petitioner no.2 Amrika Kumari @ Amirka Kumari would surrender in the court of the S.D.J.M., 2 Biraul at Benipur, Darbhanga within a period of four weeks from today, she will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in Ghanshyampur P.S.Case No. 10/2004 to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also on a condition that she must remain present in course of trial on each and every date and absence of any single day during the trial would entail the consequence of cancellation of her bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 is hereby rejected. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/