IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 178 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.18640/2001 Dated 25/05/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS: ---------------------------------- 1. M/S.INDUSTRIAL SEWING SYNDICATE 39/3822, ALAPATT CROSS, RAVIPURAM, COCHIN, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIX, MRS.PARVATHY, W/O.GOPAKUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, 39/3822 ALAPATT CORSS, RAVIPURAM, COCHIN. 2. MRS.PARVATHY, W/O.GOPAKUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, PROPRIETRIX, M/S.INDUSTRIAL SEWING SYNDICATE 39/3822, ALAPATT CORSS, RAVIPURAM, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER RESPONDENT(S): /RESPONDENT --------------- THE NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD., (A GOVERNMNET OF INDIA ENTERPRISE), S-67, G.C.D.A. COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, MARINE DRIVER, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, COCHIN-682 031. MR.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC FOR THE RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.178 of 2010 in O.P. No.18640 of 2001(R) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 25th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The writ petition was dismissed by judgment dated 25/05/2009. The review petitioners herein, who are the writ petitioners, are seeking review of the judgment on the ground that although in relation to the transaction, which was the subject matter of the writ petition, there was a criminal case and they have been acquitted. 2. In my view, the fact that the petitioners have been acquitted by the Criminal Court by Annexure A1 judgment is inconsequential in so far as the judgment in the writ petition is concerned. Therefore, I see no reason to review the judgment, and the review petition is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg