IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3233 of 2010 BAIDYANATH JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 2 07-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University. It is the case of the petitioner that due to incorrect facts being pleaded by the University in C.W.J.C. No. 793/88, the services of several employees of the University including that of the petitioner were terminated and although the appellate court in appeal preferred by the petitioner and others held that incorrect facts have been pleaded by the University and directed for rehearing of the writ petition, since the writ petitioner had obtained relief from the University, writ petition was permitted to be withdrawn by order dated September 12, 2008 without placing the correct facts which would have warranted relief to the petitioner also. The order of the writ court dated 12th September,2008 contained in annexure-2 shows that all aspect of the matter were considered including the effect of earlier observations made in the writ proceeding on 17-4-1998 and it 2 was observed that since the writ petition itself was sought to be withdrawn, the interim observation would be of no value to any one. Besides such observation the writ court further observed that any party being aggrieved will have the right to approach the proper forum for redressal of their grievances. We are of the considered view that if the petitioner has any grievance against the University, he must seek his remedy through any other proceeding and not through the contempt application. Hence, this application is dismissed with the liberty aforesaid . Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)