[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.378 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.379 OF 2008 Shri.Prabhakar Shrikrishna Khandekar ..Applicant Vs. Shri.Vasant Dattatraya Paranjape and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Shadab Peerzade advocate for applicant Mr.Vinod Bapat Adv. for Respondent Mr.A.S.Shitole A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 2, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-orignial accused, the respondent-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Complainant and accused are present in Court. 2. By judgment and order dated 29.1.2008, the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. Court No.9 Pune has convicted the applicant under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in CC No.12999 of 2007. Appeal preferred by the applicant came to be [-2-] dismissed, hence, this revision. 3. The learned advocate for the complainant has stated that during the pendency of these revision applications, parties have amicably arrived at the settlement among themselves and they have entered into Memorandum of Understanding so also one Deed of Cancellation has been executed between the parties. Copies of Memorandum of Understanding and Deed of Cancellation have been tendered which are taken on record and marked as ‘X-1’ and ‘X-2’ for identification. In view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, matters are compounded and the accused are acquitted thereunder. 4. Revision Applications are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]