CWP(T) No. 6992/2008 21.09.2010 Present: Mr. Bhim Raj, vice Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. S. Rana, Asstt. A.G. for the respondents There is no dispute that petitioner was not paid salary for the period of vacation. Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the Division Bench of this Court in Baldev Singh vs. State, CWP No. 415 of 2000. They submit that the facts are similar and the directions issued by this Court in the aforesaid case be applied mutatis mutandis to the facts of the instant case also. Ordered accordingly. 2. The present petition is disposed of with the observations that the directions issued in the aforesaid case shall apply mutatis mutandis to the facts of the instant case also. Consequential action be taken within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, failing which thereafter petitioner shall be entitled to interest @9% per annum. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. September 21, 2010 (rana)