IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 5427 of 2004 AND WRIT PETITION No.6079 of 2004 WRIT PETITION No.5427 of 2004 Between: M/s.Faza Foundation, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Dr.Zia S.Mehdi, Arif Nursing Home, R/o.D.No.31-1-16, Lakshmi Street, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam-53020. ..... PETITIONER AND Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION NO : 6079 of 2004 Between: M/s.Faza Foundation, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Dr.Zia S.Mehdi, Arif Nursing Home, R/o.D.No.31-1-16, Lakshmi Street, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam-53020. ..... PETITIONER AND Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondent: SRI.N.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MPL. CORP. VSP) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.5427 AND 6079 of 2004 COMMON ORDER: These two writ petitions are filed apprehending demolition of the building constructed by the petitioner. At the hearing, Sri P.Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is common in both the writ petitions, submitted that after filing of these two writ petitions, the petitioner applied for regularization of the unauthorized constructions in pursuance of building penalization scheme introduced by the State Government, vide application No. BPS Zone II, Ward 15, SR 156. Learned counsel submitted that in view of this subsequent event, none of the issues raised in these two writ petitions need be adjudicated on merits. In view of the same, both the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petitions, WPMP No.7070 of 2004 and WVMP No.1391 of 2004 in Writ Petition No.5427 of 2004; and WPMP No.7899 and WVMP.No.2128 of 2004 in Writ Petition No.6079 of 2004 are dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 26.02.2009 v v