IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 1057 of 1995 Between: 1 Smt. K.K.D. Jhansi Lakshmi Bai, W/o L. Krishna Reddy, R/o 29-12-44, Venkataramana Street, Suryarao pet, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 2 Smt. M. Nalini, W/o Sri S. Ram Prasad, R/o 29-10-36, Narasimharao Naidu St., Suryarao pet, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist. 3 Dr. T. Rama Devi, C/o Sri P. Subhash Babu, Plot No.14, TEachers Colony, Patamata, Vijayawada.10 ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P., Rep by Secretary, Finance & Planning, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Government of A.P., Rep by Secretary, Education Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Govt of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Durga Malleswara Siddartha Mahila Kalasala, Rep by Secretary & Correspondents Vijayawada, Krishna Dist.,. .....RESPONDENS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioners are entitled to be promoted as Lecturers in the aided Vacancies earmarked in the department of Telugu, English, & Commerce as per the G.O.Ms.No.127, and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioners to the posts of Lecturers in Telugu, English and Commerce in 4th respondent college and pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem it proper in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/SC.KODANDA RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Sri G.Vasantha Rayulu Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: G.P. for Education The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is represented on behalf of Sri C.Kodandaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the writ petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as the petitioners who sought promotion as Lecturers were subsequently promoted as such. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Needless to state that the interim order of status quo passed in the W.P.M.P. merges with the final order and does not subsist any longer. No costs. _________ 28-6-2005 asp To: 1 The Secretary, The Government of A.P., Finance & Planning, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary, The Government of A.P., Education Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Govt of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad.