1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 09 of 2011 Abdul Rajik Abdul Nabbi Sk. and others ..VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S., Rajura, Dist. Chandrapur and 2 others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Y.B.Mandape, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. C.N.Adgokar, A.P.P. for the Respondents. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 2 nd Febru ary , 2011 . Heard. By the present application, the present applicants Abdul Rajik, Lalit Ramesh Prabhawat, Sahebrao Mohan Togre, Mohan Narayrn Potalwar have raised a grievance that they are accused in Crime No. 20/2009, registered at Police Station, Ram nagar, Chandrapur for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 364, 120-B of Indian Penal Code r/w Section 25 of the Arms Act. It is further submitted by these applicants that one of the victims namely Pradeep Nalamwar in the said case was a legal practitioner, practicing at Chandrapur Court and as such, no Advocate was ready to represent them. As such the applicants were deprived of legal assistance in their case. On earlier occasion i.e. on 25/1/2011, learned APP was requested to establish contact with his counterpart at Chandrapur and to make a statement before this Court. Today, Mr. Mandape, who is appointed as a Special Prosecutor in Sessions Case No. 166/2009 and learned APP Mr. 2 Adgokar, on instructions, state that these applicants are being represented through various lawyers. Mr. Mandape, learned Advocate submits that as per his instructions, the sessions Case is at the stage of framing of charge. In view of these facts, in my opinion, the grievance of the applicants is already redressed and as such no further orders are necessary in the application. As such the application is rejected and disposed of accordingly. Registry to inform the order to the applicants accordingly. JUDGE Diwale