HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR C.R.P.No. 5102 of 2009 ORDER No representation for the petitioners. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners was absent on 10-12-2010. Earlier, notices sent to the respondent were returned unserved. This Court by order dated 04-02-2011, permitted the petitioners to take out fresh personal notice by registered post with acknowledgment due. The matter underwent several adjournments. There was no representation for the petitioner on 26-11-2010 and 04-02-2011. No steps were taken to serve notices on the respondent. 3. I have perused the entire record. There are no merits in this revision. 4. The petitioners herein filed an application under Order 18 Rule 17 read with 151 CPC to recall P.W.2 for marking the certified copy of a simple sale deed filed in O.S.No.49 of 2005. The respondent filed a counter and contended that no foundation was laid in the pleadings with regard to the alleged sale deed and original document is not filed and even the original document is unstamped. The lower Court has upheld the contentions of the respondent. 5. Admittedly, P.W.2 is not a party to the document which is sought to be marked. The petitioners have not explained as to what happened to the original document. Moreover, the document is copy of the original sale deed and it appears that original document itself is not impounded. When there is no foundation laid in the original pleadings with regard to the original document which is unstamped, no purpose will be served by receiving such document, because it is inadmissible. 6. I do not see any illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the lower Court. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. In the circumstances, no costs. ________________________ Justice B.Chandra Kumar Date: 10-06-2011 KVR