HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27861 OF 20011 ORDER: The petitioner was employed as a Conductor in the Miyapur – II Depot of APSRTC. He was removed from service on disciplinary grounds. Aggrieved by the order of removal, he filed I.D. No.167 of 2009 in the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad. An Award was passed on 10-11-2010 directing reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service, but without back wages. The Award was published on 05-02- 2011. Shortly thereafter, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 31-03-2011. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have not extended the benefit of the Award. He made a representation on 05-02-2011 the Depot Manager, Miyapur-II Depot, the 3rd respondent herein. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. For one reason or the other, the petitioner was not reinstated into service in compliance with the Award passed in the I.D. On account of the fact that the petitioner was not reinstated before he attained the age of superannuation, the respondents are under obligation to extend the monetory benefits, if any, in terms of the Award. Since the petitioner is no more in service, the representation made by him needs to be examined at the earliest. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to pass orders on the representation, dated 05-02- 2011, submitted by the petitioner, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J October 12, 2011. KTL