1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. L.P.A. No. 332/2011 in WRIT PETITION NO.2499/2011 (D) (Krushna s/o Upasrao Bondre and others .vs. Gajanan s/o Vitthal Bondre and ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 05, 2011 Heard Advocate Shri A.R. Ingole for the appellants/original petitioners and learned Additional Government Pleader Smt. B.H. Dangre for respondents no. 7 to 11. The learned Single Judge of this Court has noticed that dispute was about mutation and the Special Civil Suit No. 779/2009 is already pending. The Revisional authority observed that though the partition deed was executed, the present appellants did not bother to get their names mutated till death of father of respondents no.1 to 6. It has been then found that mutation proceedings are only for fiscal purposes and do not confer any title or ownership over the property in dispute. Thus all the relevant aspects are looked into and thereafter a particular view has been reached. We 2 do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. L.P.A. is accordingly disposed of. Liberty to the appellants to move for expeditious disposal of the civil suit. JUDGE JUDGE halwai