1 cp-300-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY PETITION NO. 300 OF 2010. Ganatra Finance Private Limited. ..Petitioner. vs. Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, Mumbai. ..Respondent. .... Mr. A.W. Ansari, for Petitioner. Ms. Jyotsna Pandhi, for Respondent. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER 2010. P.C. The Company Petition is taken out by the Director of the Petitioner Company under sections 560(6) ad 560(7) of the Companies Act, 1956 for setting aside of the order dated 18th November 2009 of the Respondent, striking off the name of the Petitioner Company and seeking restoration of the registration of the Petitioner Company. 2. The learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent states that he has no objection if the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). However, the Court may direct the Petitioner Company to make good the offences arising out of non- compliance of sections 266A to 266G, 159 to 162, 166, 220, etc. of the Companies Act, 1956. 3. The Company Petition is allowed in terms of prayer 2 cp-300-10 clauses (a) to (d). However, the Petitioner Company shall file all statutory returns and compliances elecronically under the various provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 with the Registrar of the Companies within a period of eight weeks from today. The Petitioner Company has stated that the Company shall make appropriate Application under section 621A of the Companies Act, 1956, for compounding the aforesaid violations/ offences. The statement is accepted. 4. The Petitioner Company shall pay cost of Rs.10,000/- along with Form No.21 to the Registrar of the Companies. 5. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. 6. The Company Petition is accordingly, disposed of with no order as to costs. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]