INjngE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATHSGARH AT BHASPUR ^ M.A.NO/ K^-/2005 APPELLANT:' •Aml Kumar Diwan S/0- Ajay Kumar Diwan Aged about 40 years R/0- Sundar Nagar Raipiir Distt- Raipur (C.O.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:- V- ^ ^3, / ^ Nirbhay 'Hiakur S/0> Firat TbaSsw Aged about 55 years DulaurinBai W/0- Nirbhy Thakur Aged about 50 years Khomlal S/O-NirbhyThakur Aged about 25 years AU residenf of Barbaspiu- P.S.- Gatapar Tah.- Khairagarh Distt- Rajnanc^aon (C.G.) Preetana Sonwani S/0- Dayaraia Sonwani Aged about 41 years R/0- Near Saimandir Raipzir P.S.- PuraiuBasti Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) Qi^ ^) The National Insiu-ance Company Limited Branch Rajiiand^ion (C.G.) MBUOOFAPPEAL UNDBR SBCnOH 173 OF MOTBR VEHICUE ACT 1988, Intrim Amount Awarded - Rs. 50,000/- 3o XT-ne—' 3:5^'^1'><1^,®T(1'M'1(S,fs|C)l<-iy *<INdl *^ll«b .:..5&.:..L%J. W^ 200^ ar^r-qsR; (ipfgggtr) sn^y ?n R-ii.'* wi an^l stitii'* ^•~^" ;.< ^mw^iteisii^i APPBLLANT V^rsus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 25.04.2007 SI^ri Vivek Rattiore, ShriR.N.Jha, counse <frl<)Id'ifl'i *iwcif^fe^ <f^tt$i< ^'3ffiTH3II^5T Aail Kumar Diwan, S/o. Ajay Kumar Diwan, Aged about 40 years, R/o. Simdar Nagar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Nirbhay Thakur, S/ o. Fu-at Thakur, Aged about 55 Years. Dulauriu Bai, W/o. Nirbhay ThakuT, Aged about 50 years Khoialal S/o. Nirbhay Thakur, Aged about 25 years. AU resident of Barbaspur P.S.-Gatapar, Tah. Kbairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Preetam Sonward, S/o. Dayarata Sonwani, Aged about 41 years, R/o. Near Saunaadir, Raipur, P.S.—PuraaiBasti, Raipur Distt. Raipur(C.G.) TIie National Insuraace Coiupany Limited, Braach Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) cottasel for the appeUaut. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. ^l ^EET.arpn^r, riTf1y'l<i, Rl^l^y *IINdl *t)l* .....M^.^:...|.^^........^... antw vw (4c)t^«(<8T) snt^i.wfeFtfgT WH3IRW sCTW ^ TOIIWdfefSII^1 Shri Sourabh Sharaaa, cou4sel for respondent No.5. Heard. This appeal is directed agajinst the m.terim award dated p7.12.2004 passed by Additio^ial Motor Accident Claims Tnbunal, Khau-agarh whereby a sjuin of Rs. 50,000/- has been tovarded to the claiDiaats. [ Leamed counsel for fhe a^peUaut submits that durmg ^endency ofthis appeat final aw^rd has been passed aad the ^astaut appeal has becoine urfruc^uous. Accordingly, fbie appeal is +l'i|I<'t41-f *ii*iiniii1:s^t <fa*(i< ^srfgiTSii^i Idismissed as haviug becomie tolructuous. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge GRPRJ—FS/246—2/20Q?— 5C.OQO. I-^'Cp!]: i!;