1 S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.1041/1996 LRs. of Thakur Umaid Singh. vs. Madan Singh. Date : 9.11.2006 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Om Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh for Mr.S Srimali, for the respondent. - - - - - The order dated 9.10.2006 was a per-emptory order. Office has reported that PF notices have not been filed in compliance to the Court's order dated 9.10.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to submit that he has filed notices within three days from the date of order i.e. 9.10.2006 but he could not submit any date. Be it as it may. Office was directed to re-check today and the office has reported that PF notices have not been filed. In view of the above, office has wrongly listed the matter in the Court as in the light of the order dated 9.10.2006, the revision petition already stands dismissed. Therefore, this revision petition is dismissed for non- compliance of the order dated 9.10.2006. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya