IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition ( Criminal) No. 123 OF 2011 (1) Smt. Mamta W/o Sri Narayan Singh (2) Narayan Singh ………….Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …….Respondents. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ in nature of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioners. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners are major and they solemnized the marriage on 15.2.2011 at Arya Samaj Mandir, Sarda Nagar, Chauk, District Saharanpur U.P. The copy of marriage certificate issued by the Arya Samaj is annexed as annexure no.2 to the writ petition. Respondent no.4, has become annoyed with the marriage of the petitioners. Hence, she along with other relatives started harassing the petitioners by adopting illegal means. Hence, this writ petition. Heard Mr. A.V. Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Amit Bhatt, AGA for the State and perused the material available before us. Having considered the submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that it is not a case in which a writ in the nature of Mandamus can be issued at this stage. However, we direct that respondent no.2 i.e. S.S.P., Dehradun for providing the adequate security from respondent no.4, the S.S.P., Dehradun after assessing the entire situation at the spot, shall do the needful in the matter. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of finally. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Nirmal Yadav, J.) 24.2.2011 kuldeep