IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^)G-?^OF 2009 PETITIONER Kamta Ram Thakur, S/o Bishali Ram Thakur, aged about 67 years, Retired Head Master, R/o Majhar Katta, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur (CG). ,'A RESPONDENTS /\. /5. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of.SC/ST Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, District Raipur (CG). Block Education Officer, Department of Tribal Welfare, Block Gariyaband, District Raipur Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). Sr. Accounts Officer, Office of the Accountant General, > Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ...^ix ^•:^^ '^ ^ .^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATn8GARHAT_B!LASPUR WRIT PETmON (8V No. 2074 of2009 PETmQNER : KamtaRaml-hakw. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRn^PETITIONUNDERAR'nCLE226QFTHECQNS^^^^^^ INDIA SB:Hon9bIeShrtSatishK.Agmhotoi,J, Present: Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forfhe State/respondeht No. 1 to 3. Shri R.Pradhan, Advocate forthe respondent No. 4 and 5. Om)ER(ORAL) (Passed on 14th day of January, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment ofretiral beneiits matter- may be referred to the pension coimmttee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) aiid other comiected m<atters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuaiit to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.200^ passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of ChhaUisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by fhe judgment and order dated r ,-'•^••1.^ ' .^a^.'"% i ^S^ J ^Jrf-^ ^mwvi^. 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appearing for fhe parties. 3. Tfais petition is accordingly disposed ofin the same teiins i.e. tlie office ofthe Advocate General is directed to send the ease to fhe ComiYiittee, within a period of 15 days trom fhe date Qfrec^iptofa copy ofthe petition from the petitioner and this order. lliereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance witii law, after affordmg proper opportumty of hearing to the petitionw. The petitioner aiid the officers concemed may file additional dociunents, ifnecessary. Tlie etitii'e exercise, including payment ofretiral dues, ifany.tothe petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy offhis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy ofthe petition to fhe leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwardmg the same to the Committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Axnit