IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WA.No. 323 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19579/2009 Dated 19/02/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC ----------------------------------- GOPAKUMAR B.NAIR , PROMOTER & BUILDER, SERENE PARK, GBN SPACES, PB.NO 5710, HOTEL SILVER SAND COMPLEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER 1,2 & 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WPC. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT TOWN PLANNER, TOWN PLANNING OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ADVOCATE SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR FOR R3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS FOR R1 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.CHELAMESWAR, C.J. & P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.A.No.323 of 2010 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT J.Chelameswar,C. J. This writ appeal is preferred by the first respondent in W.P(C).No.19579 of 2009 aggrieved by the judgment dated 19-2-2010. By the said writ petition the respondents herein challenged Ext.P7 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. By the judgment under appeal the writ petition was allowed, Ext.P7 was quashed and the matter was remitted back to the above mentioned Tribunal for fresh adjudication. 2. During the pendency of the instant appeal, by order dated 10th March, 2010 this Court issued certain directions indicating the matters which are required to be considered by the Tribunal. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up the learned counsel for the appellant Sri.D.Kishore, submits that the Tribunal has now W.A.No.323 of 2010 -:2:- disposed of the matter and the decision of the Tribunal is in favour of the appellant herein. In the circumstances we do not see any reason to proceed further in the writ appeal. The writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. J.CHELAMESWAR, Chief Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. J.CHELAMESWAR, C.J. & P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.A.No.323 of 2010 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 29th June, 2010