IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.885 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.885 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.885 OF 2008 Shri Raja Shrikrishnan Iyer .. Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent. Mr.V.N.Shingnapurkar for the applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 9th April, 2008. DATED : 9th April, 2008. DATED : 9th April, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard rival parties. 2. The learned A.P.P. for the State could not file any counter affidavit to oppose the application of the applicant contending that the Investigating Officer could not get any material against the present applicant and, therefore, the applicant is not required by the Investigating Officer. In view of this statement made by the learned A.P.P., learned Counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move the application once again, if required. However, he submits that if the Investigating Officer desires to take the present applicant in custody, he shall give 72 hours notice to the applicant. The prayer made is reasonable. The learned A.P.P. has no objection for giving 72 hours notice, if required. The applicant also undertakes to co-operate with the Investigating Officer and to attend the concerned police station and and when required. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)