: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO.22940 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO.22942 OF 2008 Gulam Nabi I Khan & Ors. ..Appellants. Vs. M.M.R.D.A. (MUIP) & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.C.G.Gavvekar i/b.Mr.R.P.Ojha for the Appellants. Mrs.Kiran Bhagalia for Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 DATED : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 DATED : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The impugned order warrants no interference. If the structure falls within the roadline, the Respondents are entitled to remove the same. In fact this is the effect of the orders passed in the Writ Petition also. 2. It was submitted that an officer of the first and second Respondent ought to visit the site to determine the roadline. That they no doubt will do. The only question is whether after demolishing the structure it was illegally reconstructed again, partly on the roadline. There is nothing on record which indicates conclusively that the : 2 : reconstructed structure is not within the roadline. However, it is made clear that only that part of the structure which falls within the roadline will be removed for the purpose of the road widening project. 3. With the above clarification, the Appeal from Order is disposed of. Nothing survives in the Civil Application which is also disposed of as such. ***