Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7078 OF 2008 Vishwanath Ganpat Jadhav & anr ..Petitioners. vs. Union of India and ors. .. ..Respondents. None for the Petitioners. Mrs. S.V.Bharucha for Respondent No.1. Mr Milind Sathe with Mr C.D.Pate i/b M/s. Junnarkar & Asso.for Respondent No.2. Mr B. Colabawala i/b Madekar & Co. Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 27, 2009 P.C. 1. When the matter is called, none appears for the petitioners. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents have drawn our attention to section 10 (2) of the Petroleum and Minerals, Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User In Land) Act, 1962; wherein there is a provision that if the amount of compensation determined by the Competent Authority under sub-section (1) is not acceptable to either of the parties, the amount of compensation shall, on application by either of the parties to the District Judge within the limits of whose jurisdiction the land or any part thereof is situated, be determined by that District Judge. None present. Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (K.K.TATED, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)