HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILAsPUR W.P.[Sl No. 5560 of 200‘7 PETITIONER Rewamm Sahu aged 57 years Son of Iats Shri Ramsingh Sahu, Peon, Municipal Corporation, Durg. Versus w2m‘tzg«awmowmm¢ a .o A h V REsPONDEms 1 Municipal Coxpomu'on, Durg ' Through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Durg 2 Ramkisan Patel, Chaukidar/Peon, Municipal Corporation, Durg (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indial Aggearanc : Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the peu'tioner. oRAL ORDER (23.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the peu'tioner argues that the petitioner was im'tially appointed as Zan'baksh by order dated 31.10.86 in Municipal Corporation, Durg. Thereafter, he was working on the post of Peon in Account Section. Thereafter, by order dated 12.5.2006, he has been directed to work as Rani Choukidar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by this ‘ order, the cadre of the petitioner has been changed, therefore, the order is bad in law. I have perused the contents of the order (Annexure-Pi’l). The order simply says that the petitioner, who is working on the post of Peon in Account Section, is being transferred to Main Oilice to work as a night Watchman. The order clearly shows that it was a transfer of the department, not that of the &“(a >W.P.(S).No. 5560 of2007 post or cadre. This is clcar &om the wordiugs used in the order and also mm the heading ofvertical column No.3. In View of the above, I do not find any force in the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition has no merit, the same is not worth admission and it is accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti