IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 482 of 2008(G) ---------------------------- OP.1082/2003 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... PETITIONER : PETITIONER ------------------------- RAMADEVI, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O JANAKI AMMA, RATNAVILASAM HOUSE, AIXKADU MURI, KODUMON VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENTS : RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. SHAKTHIDHARAN NAIR, AGED 47 YEARS, RAMAN PILLAI, MANGALAPPALLIL HOUSE, ARUVAPPULAM MURI, ARUVAPPULAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 2. RADHA, AGED 43 YEARS, PUTHUPPARAMPIL VEEDU, ATTACHAKAL P.O., KONNI, NOW RESIDING AT MANGALAPALLIL HOUSE, ARUVAPPULAM MURI, ARUVAPPULAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ Mat.Appeal No.482 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 ORDER/JUDGMENT BASANT, J. I.A.No.2014 of 2009 The application is not pressed and may now be dismissed in the light of the acceptance of the decree for divorce in O.P(HMA) No.170 of 1997 of the Additional District Court, Pathanamthitta it is prayed. Request accepted. This application is dismissed as not pressed. C.M.Appl.No.1478 of 2008 This petition is to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the appeal. Parties have settled all their outstanding disputes. This application is not opposed. We take a lenient view. Petition allowed. Delay condoned. Mat.Appeal No.482 of 2008 When this Mat.Appeal came up for admission, counsel for both sides submit that all the pending disputes between the parties have been settled and compromised. Decree for divorce in O.P.(HMA) No.170/97 referred above is accepted by the Mat.Appeal No.482 of 2008 2 appellant and I.A.No.2014 of 2009 is dismissed as not pressed. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has, in full satisfaction of all her claims including the order passed in O.P.No.1082 of 2003, received an amount of Rs.3,25,000/- and has no outstanding claim against the respondent. In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the appellant prays that this Appeal may be dismissed as not pressed recording the fact that the impugned decree has been satisfied by the respondent. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is accepted. This Mat.Appeal is, in these circumstances, dismissed as not pressed recording the further fact that the amount due under the impugned decree has already been paid and discharged by the respondent. No cost. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/-