1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- WRIT REVIEW No. 40 of 2003 DEVI SINGH V/S STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Mr. DC SHARMA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. Anand Purohit, AAG, for the respondent Date of Order : 11.5.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- Heard counsel for the parties. Perusal of the order, passed in DB SAW No. 508/98 which is sought to be reviewed being dated 8.3.2002 shows that thereby the appeal was found to have become infructuous and was dismissed as having become infructuous. May be that some statement of learned counsel for the State was recorded about the employee having been paid remuneration as per the directions of the court until he discharged functions as cook, and he having been retired and to be no more in service. The review seeks to assail that these statements were wrong. 2 In our view, in view of the fact, that may be by recording whatever statement, since appeal was dismissed as infructuous, and no interference, even remotely, was made in the order passed by learned Single Judge, in that view of the matter the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs as granted by learned Single Judge, and is in no manner adversely effected, by whatever statements were made by learned counsel for the State in appeal. In that view of the matter we need not review the order dated 8.3.2002. The review petition is dismissed accordingly. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /jgoyal/