^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. A^peUante Non-appicants Respondents Applicants tVI.A.C.No.216of2008 1. Ramadhar S/o Late Sukhan Lal Kewat, agedabout45years,R/oBadiKonj,P.S. Koni,.Tah. & Distt.iBilaspur (CG) 2. Om Pral^sh S/o Ramadhar Kewat, aged about R/o Badi Koni, P.S. Koni, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (CQ) Versus 1. Gore Lal S/o Jhanglu Gadewal, aged about 48 years, |R/O Koni, P.S. Koni Distt. Bilaspur (CG) 2. Bajaj Aliiance i General Insurance Company Limited, through Branch Manager, Branch Office- Rajendra Nagar Chowk, Tjah & Distt. Bilaspur Miscellaneous apDeal underSection 173 of the Nlotor Vehicle Act, 1 988 Present: Shri Manq K. Sinha,counseifortheappellants. ORALORDER (Passed on 15.02.2008) Heard onadmission. ; (2) Learned counset for the appellants submitted that the Tribunal has awarded the compensation primarily against the insurance company and also made a stiputationin the award that iftheinsurance companydoes not pay the amount within a period of 2 months, interest at the rate of 9% wiil be payabie by the insurance company. At the same time, the Tribunal has aiso ordered that interest at the rate of 9% per annum shali be borne by the appetlants i.e. ownerand driver also. (3) Learned counsel for the appellants prays for permission to withdraw this appeal while submitting that he woutd make anapplication for review of sub-para (2) of Para-11 ofthe impugned award dated 21.9.2007 passed by the VIIIth Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (FTC) Bilaspur in claimscase No.49/2006. (4) In view of the submission,this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellants are at liberty to have recourse to such remedy as may be avajlable to them under iaw. Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh