IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2007 / 1ST SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 12307 of 2007(M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ----------------- 1. C.D.CHANDRAN, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.DAMODARAN, CHEMMANCHIYIL ANAYIRANGHAL PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. RAMDAS.C.M., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, CHEMMANCHIYIL ANAYIRANGHAL PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. SAIPATHY RAJ, EETTICAL, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 4. SANTHOSH, PUTHENPURACKAL, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 5. PRASANTH, BAGLAPARAMBIL, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 6. M.C.SAJIMON, MADAKKATTU, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 7. SANTHOSH, S/O.NARAYANAN, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 8. REJI, S/O.SHAMUEL, MANIYAKUNNEL, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 9. SALVINAYAN, VADAKKEKARA, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. 10. RAVI, KARODVEETTIL, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHANTHANPARA POLICE STATION, IDUKKI. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOPPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. SURESH, S/O.SIVAN, ASARIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ANAYIRANGHAL P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.M.VARGHESE SRI.ROY THOMAS SRI.MATHEW SEBASTIAN MARAYOOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.12307 of 2007 APPENDIX PETITIOINERS' EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 7.4.2007. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE P.R.RAMAN & K.HEMA,JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.12307 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Raman, J. The petitioners seek for a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to give police protection to the life of the petitioners and allow him to reside in 50 hectors of revenue land in Anayiranghal dam site till the disposal of W.P(C).No.30456 of 2006. As regards the latter prayer is concerned, no such relief can be granted in a separate Writ Petition. Such a prayer if at all has to be sought in the same Writ Petition. 2. As regards the prayer made for police protection, in the counter affidavit filed by the fourth respondent it is submitted that nobody is residing in the area now in question, including the fourth respondent, since the land belongs to the Government. In such circumstances, no police protection as such can be granted. The above Writ Petition is thus dismissed without prejudice to the contentions raised in W.P(C).No.30456 of 2006. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.