1 CR.APP.NO.1917/2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1917 OF 2009. Mohan Murlidhar Aghav ...Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ... Mr.U.B.Bondar, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs.S.B.Wadmare, APP for the respondent. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 29th June, 2009. COURT'S ORDER: 1. The applicant and two others are accused of committing offences punishable under Sections 354,452, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The complainant, however, accuses the applicant as main perpetrator. She said on 1st of May, 2009 at about 10.00 a.m. the 2 CR.APP.NO.1917/2009. applicant came and touched her with an intention to outrage her modesty and thereafter he assaulted her with kicks and fists. When she raised alarm, her family members approached and the applicant assaulted even them. While this was going on, two companions of the applicant rushed to the spot and they too assaulted the complainant and others. I am told that the applicant's two companions are granted anticipatory bail. But the role of the applicant described in the complaint is that of the main perpetrator. I am not inclined to accept the argument that this was a case of false implication. There is strong prima facie case against the applicant, I am not considering this as a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Application stands rejected. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp.