IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14719 of 2008 Between: Sai Simha Tower Flat Owners Welfare Association, Regd.No.1757/2005, D.No.10-87, Indira Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its Secretary B.Ramadas, S/o. Late Pydiyya, aged about 58 years, F.No.403, Sai Simha Towers. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner. 2 G.Vasudeva Rao Sai Simha Towers, D.No. 10-87, Ward No.68, Indira Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in taking action against the illegal construction be carried by 2nd respondent in deviation of sanctioned plan as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to demolish all the illegal constructions made by the 2nd respondent contrary to the sanctioned plan in premises bearing H.No.10-87, situated at Indira Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.HARINATH GUPTA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.(SC FOR VUDA)N.RANGA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been filed by Sai Simha Tower Flat Owners Welfare Association, represented by its Secretary, B.Ramadas assailing the inaction of Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation-1st respondent on the representation submitted by the petitioner-Association with regard to unauthorized constructions carried on by G.Vasudeva Rao-2nd respondent. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the petitioner-association submitted representations on 19.12.2005, 30.12.2005, 18.01.2006, 23.01.2006, 07.07.2006, 27.07.2006, 14.08.2006 bringing out the unauthorized constructions made by the 2nd respondent and the said representations remained unattended. Thus, the petitioner approached this Court invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner with regard to unauthorized constructions allegedly made by the 2nd respondent and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after putting on notice to all the affected parties, including the 2nd respondent. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. _________ 10-07-2008 Note: Issue CC by one week. (B.O) rkk