SA No. 35 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Shri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the plaintiff/appellant, and perused the impugned judgment and decree dated 01.04.2009, passed by first appellate court (Additional District Judge/IVth Fast Track Court, Haridwar), whereby said court has reversed the decree passed by the trial court and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff/appellant. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that the plaintiff/appellant instituted suit No. 346 of 1993, and suit No. 61 of 1994, with the plea that the plaintiff was in possession of the land situated in plot No. 37 from the period prior to zamindari abolition. The plaintiff/appellant sought declaration of his ownership over the land in suit. The defendants/respondents contested the suit and pleaded that the land in suit is zohar (pond) and it vested in Gaon Sabha. It was further pleaded that after the plaintiff occupied said land, proceedings under Section 122 B of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, were initiated against the plaintiff, which were decided in favour of the defendant/respondent and the plaintiff was directed to be evicted. Not only this, the plaintiff was directed to pay compensation for illegal occupation over the land (which was a pond). The trial court decreed the suit but the first appellate court after discussing the position of law, set aside the judgment and decree, passed by the trial court and dismissed the suit. Having gone through the impugned judgment and decree, passed by the first appellate court, and after considering the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned judgment and decree, passed by the lower appellate court. There is no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The second appeal is dismissed summarily. (P. C. P., J.) Dt. 06.07.2009 S