wp7089­09.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7089 OF 2009 Nasaruddin Abdul Razaak Mulla and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.Rakesh Bhatkar for petitioners Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 21st July 2011. P.C.: 1] There is no reason to interfere with the orders which have been passed by the authorities during the course of insertion of revenue entries. The fact that they have made some observations with regard to physical possession of the parties to the litigation by itself and without anything more, cannot be of any significance and importance. A civil suit before the competent civil court is admittedly pending. That would be decided on the basis of oral and documentary wp7089­09.doc 2 evidence led by the parties. There is no reason to assume that the civil court would be influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order as it is the only forum which will adjudicate on the right, title and interest of parties in the subject immovable property. Finding that there is no basis for such apprehension and when proceedings before the competent civil court are pending, there is no reason to interfere. Petition is dismissed. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)