1 2 cam.227.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 227 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2006 Yashoda H. Shettigar. ... Applicant Vs. Harish N. Shettigar. ... Respondent ----- Ms. Sushma Singh for the Applicant. Ms. Sharila D’Souza i/b M/s. Umesh Shetty and Company for the Respondent ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 13 th August, 2010. P.C. Although, explanation offered in the application is unacceptable. However, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the advocate, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c) on condition that the Advocate on record for the Applicant shall personally pay costs of Rs.1,500/- to the High Court Legal Service Authority within two weeks from today, failing which office to treat this application having been dismissed for non-prosecution without further 2 2 cam.227.10 reference to the Court. If above order is complied with in time, restored appeal shall proceed for final hearing as per its turn in the following week. [ A.A. SAYED, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]