BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15850 of 2011 1 A.ISMATH BATCHA, 2 I.PYARIJAN, 3 I.BEEMA JAN 4 I.GOUSI NISA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 TO 5 Vs STATE REP BY: 1 THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, (CRIME) MADURAI DT,MADURAI. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI. ... RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANTS For Petitioner : M/S. R.GOWRISHANKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed As A2 to A5 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) IPC., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, on the file of the respondent – Police. 2. Heard Mr. R. Gowrishankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K.S. Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed an offence and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners are in-laws of the de-facto complainant. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the plea of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail may not be considered. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 14/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, MADURAI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGHCOURT MADURAI 4 THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, (CRIME)MADURAI DT,MADURAI. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI. 6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI 1. CC to M/S. R.GOWRISHANKAR Advocate SR.No.43643: DM::2011:DECEMBER:15:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15850 of 2011 2P:8C:: Date :14/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/