IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11468 of 2009 1. MUKESH ROY 2. Amerika Devi 3. Rinku Devi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 17.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between the both the families for the incident of the same day. There is case and counter case. Both the family members have been injured receiving injury from acid. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are married daughters of Ramujyar Ray, while petitioner no.1 is son. Vague and omnibus allegations have been levelled against them. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 171 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Rosera (Samastipur) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)