((-1-)) HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2721 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6787 OF 2004 The State of Mah and Ors. ... Applicants Vs. M/s. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.Nitin Deshpande, A.G.P. for Applicants. Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh i/by Mr. A.V. Anturkar for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 22, 2008 DATED: JANUARY 22, 2008 DATED: JANUARY 22, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . By an interim order, we had granted interim relief in terms of Prayer Clause (d). The State has approached this court apprehending that if they do not deposit the amount, they will be in contempt. . On consideration of the contentions advanced and considering Prayer Clause (d), the same is referable to prayer Clause (c) which can only be granted at the disposal of the Petition. Hence, we issue following clarification: (1) The excess if any to be calculated and the report to be filed before this court. There is no need to deposit the excess, if any and that will be ((-2-)) subject to final order in this petition. . Both the parties to appear before the Collector who will after hearing the parties pass appropriate orders and submit report to this court. . On behalf of the Petitioner, the learned counsel submits that the calculation be done on the basis of "Class-I revenue village". On behalf of the Revenue, it is contended that the calculation has to be made on the basis of N.A. order passed in respect of the present interest. The Collector to submit an independent report in respect of the contentions advanced by the parties. . Civil Application disposed of accordingly. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)