IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34556 of 2011(T) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ RESHMA.B. NAIR, AGED 19 YEARS, D/O. P. BHAKARAN, “MIDHILA”, 1ST FLOOR, VARITHODE, OPP. VIJAYA BANK, OLAVAKKODE P.O., PALAKKAD PIN: 678002 BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. UNIVERRSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 673635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERRSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN: 673635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DST WP(C).No. 34556 / 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1: COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE PETITIONER IN I AND II SEMESTER EXAMINATION IN B.TECH ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING. EXT. P2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 12.12.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT. P3: COPY OF THE CHELLAN RECEIPT DATED 12.12.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DST ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34556/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of one paper in the 1st and 2nd semester B.Tech Electronics and Communication Examination vide Ext.P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs