IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3966 of 2010 GIRIJA NANDAN PANDEY S/O LATE SRIPATI PANDEY R/O VILLAGE + P.O.- SHEOTAR, P.S. ATARI, DISTT.- GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER NAWADA, BIHAR 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 02. 08.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner retired on 30th of June 2002 as Head Master from High School, Ramanpur, Nawada. The primary grievance of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed on 12.03.1962 by the Managing Committee of High School Dhadhour and the said school was granted permission for establishment with effect from 01.01.1963 and the full recognition of the said school was on 01.01.1965, and as such, his pensionable service ought to have been counted by the respondent State with effect from 01.01.1963 when the concerned school was granted permission for establishment. Thereafter, petitioner joined the other school namely, Kanhaiya High School, Madwa, Nawada on 01.07.1975. However, petitioner continued to receive his salary from the previous school 2 that is Dhadhour High School till 22 of November 1979. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance after his superannuation, petitioner represented his grievance for calculating the pensionable service with effect from 01.01.1963 by filing a representation dated 24th of March 2004, however the representation of the petitioner has remained unconsidered till date. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law taking into consideration the relevant circulars of the State Government. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, respondent no. 3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised in his representation in 3 accordance with law and disposed of the same by reasoned order expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The order passed on such representation may be communicated to the petitioner by post under registered cover. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)