FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5357 OF 2011 "Sayeed Aaref Husaini s/o. Akhtar Husaini Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. AM. Karad, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 9th AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to make application/complaint to the concerned authority under Section 10(1)(h) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, seeking disqualification of respondent No.4 for being a councillor, mainly on the ground that respondent No.4 has failed to pay the arrears of dues towards the corporation within the stipulated time. 3] This petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. If the petitioner makes any such application/complaint, same may be considered on merits, in accordance with law and without being influenced by this order. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5357 OF 2011 "Sayeed Aaref Husaini s/o. Akhtar Husaini Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 It is needless to mention that concerned authority shall issue notice to respondent No.4 and grant him an opportunity of being heard before entertaining the application/complaint made by the petitioner against him. It is made clear that we have not examined merits of the case. All contentions of the parties are kept open. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-