1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4166 OF 2009 Shantibai Francis Farel and Anr .. Petitioners Vs Josphine Francis Lobo and ors .. Respondents Mrs Neeta P Karnik, for the petitioners. Mr Ganesh K Sovani, for respondent no.1. Mrs Sangita S Lidkar, for respondent nos 2 and 3. Mr R.M.Patne, AGP, for respondent no.4. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 26/11/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition arises from the orders passed by the revenue authorities in RTS proceedings. There is no dispute that Regular Civil Suit No.276 of 2003 is pending before the Civil Judge, Jr Dn., Vasai, wherein the question of right, title and interest in the suit land and the question of heirship of Manu and Francis are involved. Similarly, Revision Application, bearing no.61 of 2006 between the same parties, is pending before the Divisional Commissioner, Kokan Division. In view thereof, in my opinion, the order of remand impugned in the T 2 present writ petition directing the Tahasildar to conduct an inquiry into the heirship of Manu and Francis, requires to be kept in abeyance. Hence, I pass the following order. The order dated 13.3.2009 passed by respondent no.4 in RTS Revision Application No.283 of 2007 shall remain in abeyance during pendency of the aforementioned Regular Civil Suit No.276 of 2003 and Revision Application No.61 of 2006. The Civil Court as well as the Divisional Commissioner shall decide the proceedings pending before them on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in these proceedings by the revenue authorities. It is open to the parties to approach the revenue authorities afresh for effecting necessary changes in the record of rights on the basis of the final outcome of the proceedings pending in the Civil Court and before the Divisional Commissioner. It is open to the parties to file appropriate application before the Court and the Divisional commissioner before whom the aforementioned proceedings are pending for expeditious hearing. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 3