1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3420/2010 ( Shri Rajendra Balaji Shrirang -: VERSUS :- Sau. Aruna W/o Rajendra Shrirang & others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri M.M. Ghatole, Adv. for petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 28, 2010. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. Contentions – Trial court has erroneously recorded a finding that monthly income as alleged by respondent – wife is not denied by petitioner. With the assistance of learned counsel, I have perused the reply filed by petitioner opposing the application under section 24 for Hindu Marriage Act. In entire reply, there is no denial of that income and the specific income is not specified. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE Tambaskar.