IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1598 OF PETITION NO.1598 OF PETITION NO.1598 OF 2006 Laxmi Charitable Trust & Anr..Petitioners Vs. Vice Chancellor, the University of Mumbai & Ors....Respondents Mr. S.C. Naidu i/b. C.R. Naidu for the petitioners Mr. R.A.Rodrigues, for the respondents. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 18TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. It appears that the petitioners had applied to the respondent for transfer of management of certain institutions to respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 in turn appointed a Committee. Counsel for respondent NO.2 is not in a position to inform the Court as to whether the Committee has submitted its report. Considering the above the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions:- (i) If the Committee has not already submitted the Report they should do so by following due procedure within four months from today. (ii) Onthe Committee submitting the report the Vice Chancellor to decide within two months from the date of receipt of the report from the committee or if the report has been received to decide the same within two months in terms aforestated. Rule made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J). V. MOHTA,J).