THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No.3925 of 2008 Dt.20.10.2010 Dr.Ms.Mamidi Mamatha … Petitioner Vs. 1. The Telangana University, rep. By its Registrar, Nizamabad and another … Respondents O R D E R: The petitioner assailed the action of the respondent University in not considering her candidature for the post of Associate Professor in Botany pursuant to the notification No.1 of 2007 dated 12.12.2007 and sought a consequential direction to consider her case and appoint her to the said post. By interim order dated 25.02.2008, this Court directed the respondent University to permit the petitioner to appear before the selection committee for the post of Associate Professor in Botany along with others and directed the respondent University to consider her case for appointment if she was found eligible as per law and was selected. It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent University that pursuant to the above order, the petitioner faced the selection interview but her candidature was rejected on merits. The prayer in the writ petition has therefore worked itself out. Needless to state, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of her candidature, her remedy lies by way of a separate proceeding and the same cannot be agitated in the present writ petition as it stands. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J 20th October, 2010. PNV