skc 1 CAW-1025-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1025 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1138 OF 2004 The Sangli Sahakari Bank Ltd. Mumbai ..Applicant / Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Haridar Toor i/b. Mr. Mr. S. G. Bane for Petitioner / Applicant. Mr. S. N. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Prashant Darandale i/b. Mr. Vijay Patil for Respondent No. 2. Ms. Sapana Rachure i/b. T. N. Tripathi & Co. for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : D. D. SINHA & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. 07 June 2011. P.C. : Heard the counsel for the applicant/ petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1, counsel for the respondent No.2 and respondent No. 3. 2. Civil application is moved by the petitioner / applicant seeking permission to amend the petition. The counsel for the applicant has brought skc 2 CAW-1025-11 to our notice that the writ petition was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide Order dated 31st August 2004 on the ground of alternate remedy. The matter was taken to the Apex Court and the Apex Court vide Order dated 16th November 2010 set aside the Order of the High Court and remanded back the matter to the High Court with liberty to the petitioner to move the High Court for appropriate orders during the pendency of the petition. The applicant has filed the civil application for amendment and is desirous of bringing the subsequent events on record. The counsel for the respondents seeks time to file reply. 3. Since the applicant vide civil application proposes to bring on record the subsequent facts, we allow the civil application, appropriate amendment be carried out in the petition within a period of four weeks from today. Liberty is given to the respondents to file their reply / additional reply to the amended pleadings of the petition. 4. Civil application is allowed in the above terms. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (A. R. JOSHI, J.)