FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8319 OF 2010 “Surekha Pundalik Wagh Vs. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Parag P. Shahane, Advocate for petitioner Mr. B.V. Wagh, AGP for respondent No.3. Mr. R.P. Phatke, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. V.R. Sonwalkar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- P.B. MAJMUDAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :- 2nd May, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] The grievance of the petitioner is that her tribe claim is pending before the respondent No.1 Committee since long and no decision is taken in this behalf. According to the petitioner she is not getting appropriate service benefits because her tribe claim is pending. 2] Considering the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner, in our view, the Committee is required to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner, expeditiously. Hence, we direct the respondent No.1 committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, latest, by 30th August, 2011. In case the tribe claim is decided in favour of the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8319 OF 2010 “Surekha Pundalik Wagh Vs. The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 petitioner, it will be open to the petitioner to pray for appropriate relief from the employer on the basis of the said order. 3] Subject to what has been observed hereinabove, writ petition is disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] [P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.] grt/-