^' l<y c§. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT^ILA^PUR, Writ Petition No.5b2-pf'2J)Q4 PETITIONER: ^1 ..^\ ,..-".^V^J ^°\^^.T^' <^'>^i^" '^ ^- ^c>:y ^^y ,...^^-"' £<<'' ^ RESPONDENTS: (^T ..€^^M...y ;;^" \^.; .^^ <y Y. Jokhan Prasad Gupta, son of Late Devendra Prasad Gupta, Aged aboutQ<>years, Resident / of Ramanujganj Road, Ambikapur [C.G] Versus 1. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Through: The Secretary, Danganiya Raipur. 2. The Superintendent Engineer (08&M), Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Ambikapur -^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 22^ & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA The humble petition of the petitioner above^ianied._ XI-HC-22 =F (S) ^o? ^NM4, '^ftW^, f^cnKrl^ sn^r ^ra? ^^:M(?.:...€^/^^ '^S^t" ^WC'TI^W^ 200 ^n^i^T f^lich ^l^i 'SRW^I^ ^IT^T'^cn^R'nfi^f 12.04.2004 Sljri Shri Ajit Siiigh, Adv, with Shri Yashwaat Sin.gh, G.A..f^ Hem-d. Leaiiied coi-insel for the petij was prosecuted for the offence pi] 420 QiflieLP.C. as aresultof^ been termin.ated, It is/ furtlier STJ •been acquittcd of th.e charges an| represeirtatbns' thereol^ tiie •sanie| siibmitted tiiat fbr the preseut .e| direction is given to fhe petitioner competent Authorit}r of responde^ tlie competent Authorijy of respon'l . Ha^ing heard, aii.d withou| merits of 'the case, ia -tlie opinion | seived if a directbn is given.to representation raisiiig his grievaiil of tlie i^spondents along with a <] '5Rzlfef^t;T 'HPR^f'? fe^t ^^K ^ ^rf^W 3?T^T ri Alok Sur for the petitioner. >r tlie State. ioner sui3initted:.that the petitJDuer inishable uuder Sections 419.an.d hich tlie petitioiier's seivices have bm-itted- that SLibsequeufly he has 1 tli.ough the' petitioner. has made ha^e' not been considered by th.e Electdcity . Board. Leanied cou|nsel for t3ie petitioner, however, h ads of justice will be seived if a fco make fresti represenfatbn to the its, which shall be considered by ients. expressiag aiiy' opiiiion on tlie )f.fhis Court, ends ofjustic'e willbe the' petitioiier to.snake a detailed •es before the • competeut autiiority •opy of the petition aiid this ·ord.er, [Tf^^f^f l^ >L--^ XI-HC-22 Z^ ^l^ld<4, ^xl1^^<o, t^ITCTy 3TI^?T '<T5T^ M,P^o<5~^ WHcrfF%NI<^ M 200 "^R^" ^sn^r'^T f^w^i^r '^1W^?^T ^ 3?R^I ^<H^R ^rfi^T ^-.1 vrithio.. 15 days,' and on -such. •ompetent authority of the respond^ ?wn merits in. accordaiice wttii la^ :aiiy as possible. preferabty witSim) ecclpt of the representation. It is ^iacle cleai' that if ajiy grievaiice till. reBiaiiis, tlie petitioner may ava4 the re-medy under tlie la¥7. With tlie aibresaid obsexvatioijis, tlii.s petitioii staiids disposed f. C.C. as per rules. '^TZ!feFft;T T?W^ff"? fe^ <(^l^l< ^ 37f^w ^n^r 'epresentation beiag filed, fhe nts shaU decide the same ou its by passiag reasouedk order as fc¥o m.onths'. froni the clate of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^tt^'^T