IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15478 of 2008 SUKAN YADAV son of late Gorakh Yadav, resident of Mohalla Shankar Nagar, Chandwa More, P.S.-Ara (Nawada), Dist.-Bhojpur. ….. …… Petitioner Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.Kamala Tiwary son of Hira Tiwary, resident of Mohalla- Shankar Nagar Chandwa More, P.S.-Ara Nawada, Dist.-Bhojpur ….. ……Opp.Party. ----------- 2. 23.6.2010. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has prayed for quashing of the order dated 18.9.2007 passed by learned Fast Track Court No.III, Ara in Cr. Revision No.169 of 2006. By the said order learned Fast Track Court No.III. Ara, has affirmed the order dated 24.6.2006 passed by Sub. Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Ara. By order dated 24.6.2006 the Sub. Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Ara, has converted the proceeding of section 144 of the Cr.P.C. to a proceeding under section 145 of the Cr.P.C. In view of rejection of the revision petition, this court is not inclined to entertain the present petition, which has been filed in the garb of a petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C. This amounts to second revision which is not permissible under section 397(3) of the Cr.P.C. Besides this, the Sub. Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Ara, has passed the order on 24.6.2006 and it was affirmed by learned Fast Track Court No.III., Ara, on 18.9.2007 i.e.about two years back. I do not find any material to exercise inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Code of Criminal 2 Procedure and, accordingly, the petition stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)