IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1418 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26112/2007 Dated 06/10/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: --------------------------------- R.SHEELA, PRINCIPAL, TECHNICAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL (THSS), CHADAYAMANGALAM, RESIDING AT D-73, FOREST OFFICE LANE, VAZHATHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S)RESPONDENT NO.2 IN THE WP(c): ------------------------------------------------------------ MR.(PROF) V.SUBRAMONY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O.VENKITA RAMAN.K, DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT (IHRD), PRAJOE TOWERS, VAZHATHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. SRI.S.SUJIN, SC FOR IHRD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Con.Case (C) NO. 1418 OF 2009 (S) ======================== Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T By Annexure A 1 judgment, WP(C) No 26112/2007 was disposed of making reference to Ext.P12, which suggested existence of one vacancy in the College of Engineering at Karunagappally. Petitioner was given freedom to make representation to the respondent and the respondent was directed to consider her request. Accordingly, Annexure 2 representation was made, on which Annexure 3 order has been passed. The order states that there are other seniors than the petitioner, who are equally qualified and opted for posting to the vacancies identified by the petitioner. 2. Having gone through the direction in Annexure A1 judgment and the manner in which Annexure 3 order has been passed, I am not persuaded to think that this order makes out a case of willful disobedience of the direction of this Court warranting proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. COC No.1418/09 :2 : Therefore, contempt is closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek her remedies against Annexure 3. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp