IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-9987 of 2011 Date of Decision: 01.04.2011 Satpal Sidhu ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ....Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to take appropriate action on the application of the applicant for protecting the life and liberty of the petitioner by providing security to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, vide his order dated 26.02.2011 had recommended to the ADGP Security, Punjab Chandigarh to provide security to the petitioner. It is contended that the said recommendation is still pending before the ADGP Security. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to ADGP Security, Punjab Chandigarh to look into the representation (Annexure P-7) and decide the same in accordance with law within two months from the receipt of a copy of this order. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 01.04.2011 JUDGE gurpreet