BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.7580 of 2011 RAVI @ RAVICHANDRAN :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNA NAGAR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR.NO.1397 OF 2011. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.BALAN Advocate For Respondent : ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2 filed this petition seeking for anticipatory bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 464,466,467,471 r/w Section 420 IPC,in Crime No.1397 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police 2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A2 in Crime No.1397 of 2011 and a case has been registered against three persons under Sections 464,466,467,471 r/w Section 420 IPC. The de-facto complainant has given a complaint stating that when he went to the District Court for making arrangement for sureties to his friend, A1 and the petitioner/A2 approached the de-facto complainant and submitted that they are ready to make arrangements for sureties and demanded Rs.2,000/- from the de-facto complaint and on suspicion he lodged the said complaint. He further submits that already A1 and A3 were arrested and enlarged on bail.The petitioner/A1 apprehending arrest who is none other than the husband of A1.Hence, he seeks for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Government Advocate(Criminal Side) submits that the petitioners and others demanded Rs.2,000/- for production of sureties. Hence, the de-facto complainant has given a complaint. He further submits that the petitioner is having one more case and the investigation is going on. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, it could be seen that the alleged occurrence took place on 16.06.2011 and a complaint was given on the same day and a case has been registered against the accused. Considering the fact that one more case is pending against the petitioner, I do not find any merits to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, I am inclined to direct the petitioner to surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and to file a petition for bail and in the event of filing such a petition, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, is directed to dispose of the petition as expeditiously as possible. With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. sd/- 16/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:VI, Madurai. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai City. RP/19.08.2011/1P/5C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7580 of 2011,Date :16/08/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/