1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRA No. 72/2008 Savita Samirsingh Suryavanshi Vs. Nareshsingh Pratapsingh Chauhan and 2 others . Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATED : 17h April, 2008. Heard Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the applicant. By this revision application, the applicant takes exception to the order dated 1.3.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Criminal Revision No.7/2008 by which revision filed by the respondent against order dated 2/9/2005 passed by J.M.F.C., Achalpur in Regular Criminal Complaint Case No. 68/2005 has been quashed and set aside. The applicant is the wife of Smirsingh Suryavanshi. She filed the above Regular Criminal Complaint case alleging offences punishable under Section 494 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code against her husband and 19 others including respondents herewith. Learned Magistrate issued process against the present applicants for offences under Section 494 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code which the Revisional Court quashed and 2 set aside. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant and having perused the record, I find no infirmity in the impugned order. The Revisional Court is right in holding that no case is made out by the applicant that respondents abetted for commission of offence under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code by Samirsingh, the husband of the applicant. There is no illegality or jurisdictional error in the order to warrant interference in exercise of Revisional Court jurisdiction. Hence, Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. JUDGE Ambulkar