:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 537 OF 2008 Dilip Bhaskarrao Boraste ..Applicant Vs. The Janlaxmi Sahakari Bank Ltd. and anr. ..Respondents Mr. Rameshwar N. Gite for applicant. Mr. Ashish S. Gaikwad for respondent no.1. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for State. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J. Date : November 12, 2008. Date : November 12, 2008. Date : November 12, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant - original accused, learned Advocate for the respondent no.1 - original complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. By the Judgment and Order dated 24/8/2004, the learned JMFC, Nashik convicted the applicant under Section 138 of the N.I. Act in Case No. 2631 of 2001. The appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed by the Sessions Court. Hence, this revision application. :2: 3. The learned Advocate for the respondent no.1 - original complainant has stated that during the pendency of this revision application, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in view of the settlement the respondent no.1-original complainant has already received an amount of Rs.2,02,500/- and in addition thereto the respondent no.1 be permitted to withdraw an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- which is deposited by the applicant before the Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that in view of the settlement, the complainant be permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- which is deposited by the applicant before the Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the complainant further states that in view of the amicable settlement, permission be granted to compound the matter and the applicant be acquitted. 4. In view of the above facts, permission is granted to compound the matter and the applicant-accused is acquitted therein. The :3: complainant is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.One lakh which is deposited by the applicant before the Sessions Court. Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.) (Smt.V.K. Tahilramani,J.)