:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 346 OF 1991 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 346 OF 1991 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 346 OF 1991 Sambhaji Ganapati Patil ..Appellants Mahadeo Nana Goud (Ori.Accused 1 & 2) versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. B. R. Patil with Mr. Amol Patankar for the Appellant No.1. Mr. Rajendra Shirodkar for the Appellant No.2. Mr. A. M. Shringarpure, APP for the Respondents - State. Mr. B. M. Gawade, supporting the Respondents - State. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & V. M. KANADE, JJ. V. M. KANADE, JJ. V. M. KANADE, JJ. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER,2005 DATE : 20TH DECEMBER,2005 DATE : 20TH DECEMBER,2005 OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT : OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT : OPERATIVE PART OF THE JUDGMENT : . For the reasons separately recorded, the following order is passed : ORDER ORDER ORDER . Appeal is allowed. :2: . Conviction of the appellants - original accused Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 302 read with 34 of IPC, is set aside. They are acquitted of the charges. They are on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled. . In view of the above, Criminal application No. 6917 of 2005 for modification of order dated 25.6.1991, Criminal Application No. 7127 of 2005, Criminal Application No. 7128 of 2005, Criminal Application No. 7129 of 2005, Criminal Application No. 6341 of 2005, all for review and/or recall of order dated 25.6.1991, filed by different applicants, does not survive. The same are therefore rejected. (D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) ( V. M. KANADE, J.)