IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7760 of 2011 NIHAR BHUSHAN BANERJEE & ANR Versus GOPAL CHATTERJEE & ORS ----------- 4 3.5.2011 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the impugned order this Court finds that the trial court has rejected on the ground of delay in moving the amendment application. Though the application for amendment sought to add the facts based on subsequent events, no reason has been recorded as to whether the amendment sought will change the nature of the suit. Therefore, without notice to the respondents in order to avoid further burden on respondent the impugned order is set aside. The trial court is directed to reconsider the application of the petitioner for amendment afresh after hearing both the parties in the light of the observations made above. The writ petition is disposed of. AnilKrSinha ( Prakash Chandra Verma, J.)