WP(C) 301/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.NK SINGH Heard Mr. DR Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Roy, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents. As agreed to and prayed for by the learned counsel of the partie s, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at this stage. The only case of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the petitioner was not given chance to file objection in Bikijai Case No.1/ Misc/97-98. Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain lapses in proceeding the said Bakijai case as the order itself spea ks very clearly. Copy of the order sheets of the said Bakijai is annexed as anne xure-4 to the present writ petition. It is surprising that Bakijai case, which was put up on 30.11.97 , was lingering for a considerable period and only on 15.11.10 warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner. In nowhere of the order sheet of the said Ba kijai case, there is any order that the notice was duly effected to the present petitioner before issuing the warrant of arrest. It appears that the learned Bak ijai Court directly issued warrant of arrest to the present writ petitioner. It is the further case of the petitioner that the petitioner was not given chance to file objection to the said Bakijai case inasmuch as no prop er notice was issued to the petitioner for that case. In the above factual background, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that Bakijai Court shall give opportunity to the present p etitioner to file his objection and further allowing him to put up his case. The warrant of arrest issued by the Bakijai Court is hereby recalled. Petitioner sh all appear before the concerned Bakijai Court on 01.03.2011 with the certified c opy of this order. The learned Bakijai court is to take up necessary steps purs uant to the direction of this Court in this case.