MC 2168/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Mahmmud, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. PK Roychoudhury, l earned counsel for the opposite party revision petitioner. The applicants, by the present application have prayed for vacation/modification of the interim order dated 11.3.2011 whereby and whereunder the operation of th e order dated 12.12.2010 passed in title execution case has been stayed. It has been submitted by Mr. Roychoudhury, learned counsel for the opposite part y/revision petitioner that in fact the proceeding in title execution case has no t proceeded thereafter. The revision petitioner is the decree holder who instituted the aforesaid title execution case the further proceeding of which has been stayed, which would not affect the right, if any, of the applicants. More over the revision petition is directed to be listed for admission hearing on 11.1.2012. In view of the above, I am of the view that the interim order is not required to be interfered with at this stage. The Misc. case stands closed.