\^/ M^.SMJ^LO^CHHArrMjAKH_MimL^^{JR '\e WRlT_PETm<:)N,(C)__No,'2080of2009 RE8PONDENT8 PIHHONER : Vikramjit. Singh Shergiil, S/o Shri Kulvinder .Smgli Shergill, aged about 20 years, R//o Quarter No. 1-A, Street-21, Sector -2 Bhiiai, Dislrict Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1.. Clihattisgarh Swami Vivekana-iict Techiiical Uoiversity, Tlirough its Registrar, Bliilai, DistrictDurg(C.G-) 2» Bliilai Iiistitute of Techiiology, tlirou.gh its Priiicipal, Bhilai Hoiise, Durg, District Durg 3. All India Counsel for Teahnical Education, Itidira. Gaiidhi Sposte Complex, Indraprastfia Estate, New Delhi. WEITPETITION L7NDER ARTICLE 226 OF TI-ffi CONSTmjnON OFmDlA SBj,Hon5ble^MSatishK.Agnfl»otri,J, Present: Shri M.P.S^Bhatia, Advocate for fhe petitioner, Slm Y.SThakur, Advocate for flie respoiideiit No. 1. Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocate for the respOBdent No. 3. OMDER<ORAL) (Passed on 09th day of Juiy, 2009) Heard. . • . 1, ' Leam.ed coimsel appear.mg for the respondent No. 1 submitsth.at normally, after declaration of the result tb.e amwermg sheets are retamed for a period of six moBths and thereafter, the same'are disposed of However, a.s a speci.al ca.se, ift the • answer. ^heets of the petitioner are available, fhe sa.me shall be revalued and. the results;1 would be declared accordmgly within reasonable time. • ". 2. ' In view of the above submission, accordiBg to l.earo.ed coumel appear.mg for/the petitioner, nothing survives m '{his matter for admdication.' . ' • . •• -. 3, Coiiisequently, the writ petition staeds disposed of Sd/- .. _ Sa<tebK.Wb»m Judge \ Att'ilt