1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10225 OF 2009 Abdul Rauf Mohd. Subrati .... Petitioner vs M/s. Paras Transport Company .... Respondent Mr Dilip N. Mandavia for the petitioner. Mr. V. P. Vaidya for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 16th April, 2010 P.C.: 1 The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 10.11.2009 whereby his application to re-call the witness was rejected by giving reasons. The learned trial Judge is master of his proceedings. He needs to exercise the discretion judicially. At this stage, the reasoning so given for rejecting the application, in the facts and circumstances of the case, cannot be said to be perverse or bad in law. However, it is made clear that the questionnaire so put by application dated 10.08.2009 by the petitioner, if the Court thinks is irrelevant and not necessary, but the petitioner submits otherwise, this aspect can be gone into at the time of argument or at appropriate stage of the proceedings. With this, no interference is called for in the impugned order so passed. 2 The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)