SSM 1 46.wp.2668.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2668 OF 2010 Shri. Chandraprakash D. Bhasin ....Petitioner Versus Shri. Ratan Vishwanath Koyle and anr. ....Respondents _______ Mr. Prasad S. Dani for the Petitioner. Mr. G. S. Bodbole i/b Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar for Respondent No.1. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 23 rd FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C.: By this Petition, the Petitioner challenges the order dated 1 st February, 2010, by which the learned Trial Judge has directed that if Defendant No. 2 wants to cross examine the Defendant No. 1, he should first cross examine and thereafter the Plaintiff would cross examine the said Defendant. 2. Mr. Dani, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner i.e. the Defendant No. 2 has apprehension SSM 2 46.wp.2668.10 that the Defendant No. 1 and the Plaintiff are colluding parties, and therefore, in the interest of justice the Plaintiff should first cross examine the defendant No. 1. No such material is placed on record to substantiate such an apprehension. Apart from that the Trial Judge has given sound and cogent reasons for passing the order. 3. I am therefore not inclined to entertain the present Petition in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)