IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 452 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITOIN NO. 589 OF 2003 THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY .. APPLICANT Vs. RAJENDRA SETHI @ RAJA SETHI & ORS. .. RESPONDENT Mr. S. K. Shinde with Mandar Goswami i/b D. N. Salvi for the applicant Mr. P. V. Havnur for the respondents 1 and 2 CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 13/8/2010 P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present application was filed because respondents 1 and 2 were in arrears of rent. Counsel submitted that in view of the fact that arrears have now been paid and Mr. Havnur, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 has made a statement that the rent will be paid regularly, he has instructions not to press the present application. The application is disposed of as not pressed. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)