1 A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.612 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.561 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.786 OF 2007 Faizan @ Fouzan F.Shaikh .. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Ms.Rashmi Gangwane i/b.Mr.Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : JUNE 22nd ,2009. P.C. Heard learned Advocate Ms.Gangawane i/b.Mr.Gole for the applicant who is convicted for the offence punishable under section 392 read with section 397 of Indian Penal Code. As appeal was admitted by this Court and the appellant was released on bail. The appellant had given surety of 2 one Mohd. Asgar Mohd. Siddique. Now by the present application, it is prayed by the accused that said earlier surety may be discharged and in lieu of said surety another surety by name Imtiaz Ahmed Syed Ali may be accepted. This prayer is made by the accused as his earlier surety do not want to continue his surety and want to withdraw for obtaining the passport for going to Haj pilgrimage. 2. Considering the prayer following conditional order is passed. On the trial court accepting any other solvent surety as per the condition of bail, the present surety shall stand discharged. Till the final acceptance of the new surety either named in the applicant or any other person, present surety shall continue. On appropriate application by accused before the trial Court, necessary action shall be taken by the trial Court in view of the present order. 3. With these direction, present application is disposed of. (A.R. JOSHI, J.)