IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13837 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 09, 2010. S.K.Jain .....Petitioner versus Food Corporation of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 29.5.2001 (Annexure P-3) whereby penalty of recovery of Rs.20470/- has been imposed upon him, as well as the order dated 27.4.2005 (Annexure P-7), which was communicated to him on 7.11.2009, dismissing his appeal against the said recovery order. I have gone through the impugned orders and the relevant record. In my considered view, no case to interfere with the impugned orders in exercise of writ jurisdiction of this Court is made out. The disciplinary authority has categorically held that the petitioner, without any authority and following the due procedure, has caused a loss of C.W.P.No .13837 of 2010 2 Rs.1,63,760/-. As the Railways Authorities have refused to indemnify the FCI's claim in this regard. The disciplinary authority has, however, directed the petitioner to make good the loss to the extent of 1/8th share only. The findings returned by the Disciplinary Authority are based upon correct appreciation of the material on record and warrants no inference, especially when the petitioner wants re-appraisal of the evidence by this Court. Dismissed. August 09, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE