IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40277 of 2009 MURTAZA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 7.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The court refused the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail by order dated 17.7.2007 in Cr. Misc. No. 29435 of 2007. The renewal prayer is made on the ground that the parties have compromised and that they are living together in the house of the husband. The petitioners should surrender and pray for regular bail and file a compromise petition, if it has not been filed, in the court of S.D.J.M. Purnea in connection with Complaint Application No. 1062 of 2006. If the court is satisfied about the genuineness of the compromise after making enquiry in that behalf, the court shall be at liberty to admit the petitioners on bail without feeling its hands fettered by the earlier rejection orders. The petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned observation/direction. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)