IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.732 of 2009 ABDUL JABBAR ANSARI Versus MD. ASJAD ANSARI & ANR ----------- 2/ 18.05.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. As regards three amendments as per paragraph 1 and 2 of the petition seeking amendment filed by defendant in their written statement, those amendments do not appear of much consequence but as regards the change in stand as per paragraph 3 of the amendment petition, that was likely to have its own effect on the ultimate disposal of the Eviction suit . Under the present provision of Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure the party seeking the amendment of his pleading has to assign reasons as to why the fact sought to be incorporated, could not be incorporated by him in spite of his due diligence. It may appear from the very statement given in paragraph 3 of the amendment petition that pendency of the suit could be arising in 2008 which appears a subsequent event and does not appear of any consequence as regards nature and import of the suit. This Civil Revision petition is allowed with the aforementioned observations. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)