IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 8484 of 2010 Date of decision: January 28, 2011 Inder Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Chander Singh and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court. The trial court in its order dated 3.10.2008 while relying upon the demarcation report Ex.P4 observed as under :- “..... It is clear that the defendants have encroached upon killa No.6/2. As per jamabandi Ex.P1, the plaintiff is owner of he suit property measuring 1 kanal 4 marlas of killa No.6/2. Therefore, defendants have no right to interfere as defendants are not owner of the suit property of killa No.6/2 measuring 1 kanal 4 marlas. Therefore, in these circumstances, issue No.1 is hereby decided in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.” There is no denying a fact that the appeal against the said judgment was also dismissed. The judgment debtor also made a statement in the court that he has no connection with killa No.6/2 and he would not interfere in the same. As such, this petition is dismissed, however, the possession would be delivered in accordance with the decree passed by the trial court. Copy of the order be sent to the trial court for compliance. January 28, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge