CRR No. 433 of 2011 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No. 433 of 2011 of 2011 Date of Decision : 03.11.2011 Shashi Bala …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana. None for respondent No.2. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This Court on 05.09.2011 has passed the following order :- “Learned counsel for both the parties state that they have compromised the matter. The petitioner has stated that he has deposited an amount of ` 1,25,000/- as full and final settlement of the amount involved in the case. The learned counsel has agreed to deposit an amount of ` 13750/- as amount of costs with the Haryana Legal Aid Services Authority so that the compromise could be matured. Adjourned to 5.10.2011.” CRR No. 433 of 2011 of 2011 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that even `13750/- has been deposited as costs with the Haryana Legal Aid Services Authority, therefore, judgment passed by the courts below, convicting the revisionist for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, should be set aside. Since matter has been settled amicably and entire cheque amount has been paid to the complainant and costs have already been paid to the Haryana Legal Aid Services Authority, as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, present revision petition deserves to be allowed. Allowed. Impunged orders are set aside. ( Alok Singh ) November 3, 2011 Judge Anand