Regular Second Appeal No. 331 of 2008(O&M -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 331 of 2008(O&M) Date of decision : January 10, 2011 Karnail Singh ....Appellant versus Ranjit Kaur and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for respondent nos. 1 to 4 L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) CM No. 25.C of 2011 Allowed as prayed for. CM No. 26.C of 2011 The application is not opposed by counsel for the non- applicant/appellant. The application is accompanied by affidavit and document Annexure A/4 depicting date of birth of respondent no. 4 Gurpreet Singh to be 1.12.1986. He has, thus, attained the age of majority. In view of the circumstances mentioned in the application accompanied by affidavit and certificate Annexure A/4, the application is allowed. Respondent no. 1 is discharged as guardian of respondent no. 4 who has Regular Second Appeal No. 331 of 2008(O&M -2- since attained the age of majority. Respondent no. 4 is allowed to defend the appeal in his individual capacity. However, he is also being represented by his mother respondent no. 1 as his attorney. The application stands disposed of accordingly. RSA No. 331 of 2008 Learned counsel for the parties state that parties have effected compromise dated 23.11.2010 which has been signed by appellant and respondent no. 1 and also by counsel for appellant and counsel for respondents no. 1 to 4. Respondent no. 1 is also said to be attorney of respondents no. 2 to 4. Learned counsel for the parties state that the appeal be disposed of in terms of written compromise which is now marked as Annexure 'C'. The appeal has, thus, been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise effected between the parties, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise Annexure 'C' which shall form part of judgment and decree sheet. Counsel for the appellant states that post dated cheques in terms of the compromise shall be handed over by the appellant in the name of respondent no. 1 alone within seven days from today, as agreed by counsel for the parties. The case was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre functioning in this Court for effecting compromise as the parties are related inter-se. Although compromise could not be effected in the Mediation Centre on account of non appearance of respondents, the parties however pursuant to reference made by this Court are said to have effected compromise Annexure 'C'. Consequently as prayed for by counsel for the Regular Second Appeal No. 331 of 2008(O&M -3- appellant, court fees paid on the instant second appeal is ordered to be refunded to the appellant. ( L.N. Mittal ) January 10, 2011 Judge 'dalbir'