THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.19809 OF 2010 29th December, 2010. Between: GANTA BHANU PRAKASH .. PETITIONER AND STATE OF A.P. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.19809 OF 2010 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) The petitioner’s pleadings are totally deficient. So much the requisite details too are wanting. However, what we could gather from his submission is that the admission to the course of IIT was completed in the month of June, 2010 and on the strength of comparative merit of the petitioner and the respondent 3 at the relevant point of time which reveals that the petitioner had only 537 marks to his credit, whereas respondent 3 had 538. The latter being better in merit was admitted to the course. Subsequently, the petitioner claims to have got 540 marks on revaluation somewhere in the month of July, 2010 as contended by him. Thus, what emerges on the basis of the submission so made is that the selection of respondent 3 was inevitable because of her superior merit. In the given factual background, we find no fault with the admission accorded to the respondent 3. Dismissed. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 29th December, 2010. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO.19809 OF 2010 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 29th DECEMBER, 2010.