IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. No.: 120 of 2011 with C. Rev. Nos.121, 122, 123, 124, 125 & 126 of 2011. Decided on: 01.09.2011. _____________________________________________________ 1. C. Rev. No.120 of 2011. Jaswant Singh. Versus State of H.P. and others. 2. C. Rev. No.121 of 2011. Bhupinder Singh. Versus State of H.P. and others. 3. C. Rev. No.122 of 2011. Tara Singh. Versus State of H.P. and others. 4. C. Rev. No.123 of 2011. Vivek Vasudev. Versus State of H.P. and others. 5. C. Rev. No.124 of 2011. Seema Kumari. Versus State of H.P. and others. 6. C. Rev. No.125 of 2011. Chander Shekhar Sharma. Versus State of H.P. and others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioners are Para Teachers. They have the apprehension that the benefit of judgment dated 4th August, 2011, - 2 - rendered by this Court in civil writ petition No.6205 of 2011 titled Chander Shekhar Sharma versus State of H.P. and others will not be given to them since they are Para Teachers. In Dhananjay Saini versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No.2880 of 2010, decided on 21.10.2010, this Court has made it clear that Para Teachers will be treated at par with contract teachers for all intents and purposes. Therefore, it is clarified that the benefit of the judgment referred to above, shall be extended to the petitioners for the purpose of vacation salary. 2. The review petitions hence stand disposed of (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 01, 2011. (sck/hl).