z KEM/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Singla Bench M.A.No. 0mg? /2003 x y Wgi’ Appeal valued at Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand). Mg» APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ‘ ‘ ACT 1988 Appellant : /’United India Insurance Company Ltd.- (Ngll-Applicant ‘N0.1) Through : lts Divisional Manager, ‘ (Applicant No. 2) 3* 2. Budhr'nani D/o Ramprasad, aged 2O years, caste - Bhuiyan Gorelal S/o Ramprasad, s a; aged lO years, caste - Bhuiyan (Applicant No. 4) 4. Sharda D/o Ramprasad, aged 7 years, caste - Bhuiyan Respondent No. 3'& 4 are minor Through Ad—litem Guardian, Ramprasad (respondent N0. 1) All are resident of village Lakhanpur, P.S. Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) #1 A (Applicant No. 3) I t @zi La é’ Divisional Office,‘Main Road, Korba, Tah. &_Distt. Korba (C.G.)‘ ”W6 .6‘5 “2.x“ c_,Y\"'Q(:g,‘.J9‘ VERSUS Respondents afgfaApplicaiit No. {if l) ls. Ramprasad, S/o Bangali if), aged 4O years, caste - Bhuiyan (Ne’ii—Applicant No. 2) § 5 Subhash Agrawal, S/o Devi Agravyal, aged 35 years, Caste - Agrawal, Resideht of Village Lakhanpur Bus Stand, é” P.S. Lakhanpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) R fen-Apphcant No. 3) ~6. Krishna, S/o Ramjeet Harijan, ‘ if” aged 27 years, occupation- Driver Resident of Village Bandha, i u ‘ t P.S. Lakhanpin‘, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) E XLHC-w 73 ym m—mu “ya “wmvm Erma Y‘aWRaHE r x ”m7 . 03.11.2004: - Shri Dashrath counsel for the appeHant. Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of ‘the iagt that the final order'has been passed by the Tribunal nothing survives for consideration in this appeal. « Consequently, the appeal is 3dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- - Chief Justice Gupta, sir/safest a» a? we? {gaskets}