IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16003 of 2011 DAYANAND MALAKAR @ CHHOTU SON OF LATE YOGENDRA MALAKAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NONPUR,P.S.TEGHRA,DISTT.BEGUSARAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Pandey For the State : Mr. Addl.P.P. ------ 02/ 09.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Section 307,302 and some other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 17/18 of Criminal Law Amendment Act against 22-23 unknown criminals regarding killing of informant’s husband and causing injuries to informant’s son. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the only evidence which has come against the petitioner is that he was seen in the company of a number of persons prior to the occurrence. Further submission is that many co-accused who were seen in the company of other persons have been admitted to bail by different orders of this Court and two such orders have been annexed as annexures 1 and 2 in which co- accused Manoj Paswan, Raj Kumar Paswan, 2 Rajram Paswan, Raja Ram Paswan, Basudeo Paswan and Chalitra Mahto have been granted bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge I, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 1054 of 2009 arising out Barauni (Birpur) P.S.Case No. 224 of 2003. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )