,^r!'a^, r i.^gg^ i 1 ''isSp^'l | ilt^ '^/ ^h. "^?- .^•y '^S^SS^ ,-.?..-' iia •^<?!SFtt^E&ftlB^ WR1T^ET!TION (S) N0.4873 OF 2008 Sewaram Ray, aged 52 yeare, S!o Late Shrl Ramadhin Ray, Assistant Orade-111 Nam iungaiow Dewari, Tahsii Dondiiohara, District Durg (CG). Versus 1. State Government^f Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Revenue and Apada Prabandhan Department Mintetr^, D.K.S. ihavi/an, Raipiir (CG). 2. Coiiector, Durg. (Writ petition under Artksie 226 of the Constitution of India) Unale Bench : Hon'&ie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. 'resent:- Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitionsr. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General ror the (Passed on this 4tn day of September, 2008) With the consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finaity. 2) Learned counsei appearing for fhe petitioner submits thaf the petitionei- does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities within a period of three days and the same may be direcied to be Ronsidered and declded, in accordance with lavi»;within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, iearned Dy, Advocate Generat appearing for the StaSe submiis that if the representation is made, the same shalS be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance v-flth iaw, on its own merits, within a Deriod of two weeks from the date of receipt of the 4) Shri Thakur further submits that no coercive ste|» shall be taken against the petitioner, tiil the disposai oft'ne representation. 5) i hope and trust that the State Govemment shail examine the representation objectively in accordance wifh iaw and guideiines, issued by the Govemment time to time. 6) in view of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to Uown 7) Consequently, S.A.No.1, for interim reiief also stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agi Judge