G^ {ff^^ ff IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.lNO. 1111- /2010 PETITIONER: y. ^.%<^v^.. ^:^^""^ '.p:.--;^^'" 'e^i^ ••'M{!y9^ ,.-" ^•"-~~ <?<" -h.-'' ^.\- <t^' RESPONDENTS '"^. 'Lalit Mohan Tiwari S/o Shri Gaya Prasad Tiwari, aged about 70 years, (Retired Assistant Teacher) R/o vmage 85 Post Bandarchuwa Block Kansabel, District Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, School Education Departinent D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Accountant General Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Dista-ict Education Officer Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Block Kansabel, District Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRn'PETmON(S) No. 1117of2010 PETITIONER : LalitMohanThwari. RESPONDENTS VERSUS : State of ChhaBisgarh & Ottere. Writ Petitton Under Artide 226/27 OfTte ConsUtutton Of India SB: hton'bte Shri Satfeh K. AflnBiobl. Jl. Present Shri D.R.Patei, Advcwate (br the petltitxier. Shri AV.Shridhar, Pan^ Lawyer tor the State Shri Kashif Shaked, Advocate for the reqanderi; No. 2. ORALCmreR (Passed on 17fc day of Ktereh, 2010) With the consent rt teamed couns^ appeanng for the partles, the matter is hearei flnaliy. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the p^ttKxiw submlts ttiat the case, tietng payment of retiral bwieflts matter, may be r^enedto the paiston committee. 2. This Couit, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642SU)4 (Ba#ia Mand^ v. Tfie Staie trf Chliatti^aiti S Ottier^ and otter connected maBere, directed the Committee to conslder the matter of reUral dues as the disputed que^ion of facts were inwlved. The CommMee was consBtuted by 8ie State Govemnwnt, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2EX» passed in W.P. No. 1961ffl(%)6 (Smt Keja Bai Chmdistar l<fe StalB GovemmentaMliMw^ and order dated 13.03.M08 passed tn M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (Slate cf Chhattisgaih & Offie/s y. Ba/jn^fi Manftatand ano»e/i.ThiK, Uiis petitton is squarely covered by the judgment and onier cfated 31" of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642^)04 Baynaih Mandal (supi^ as submttted by leamed counsel appearing fior the parties. 3. With the conserrt of the parties, this peUtton is accontingly dtqaosed of In the same tBrms l.e. the ofSce af the Advocate Qeneial is dlrected to send tha case to ttie Committ^, wimin a penod of 15 days from ttie date of receipt of a copy of the pefilion ftom the peiitkaier and this order. Thweafter, the Committee shatl issue nottce to the pefittoner and the officers coiKemed, withln a further pertod of 15 days. The CommMBe stall condder and pass order, In accoidance with law, after affbiding proper opportunity of hearing to the p^Uioner. The pettttoner and the offlcere concerned may (tte addtttonat documents, if nece^aiy. The artlie exerei^, induding payment af rd:iai dues, S any, to ttie petitioner fae completed vwttun a period of four months " fromthedateofreceiptofacopyotttilsoider. - 4. The petitioner shatl supply extra copy of the petitlon to the tearned counsel appearlng for the respondents for foiwaidlng the same to the CommW!M^ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^: