IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) FRIDAY THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN //PRESENT// THE HON`BLE SRI JUSTICE: VILAS V AFZULPURKAR COMPANY APPLICATION No. 7 OF 2013 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 57 OF 1999 IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND IN THE MATTER OF M/S. SIRSILK LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Between: 1. G. Arun Kumar, S/o. Late Sri Pullaiah. 2. G. Kiran Kumar, S/o. Late Sri Pullaiah …. Applicant AND 1. The Official Liquidator, High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the Liquidator of M/s. Sirsilk Limited (IN Liqn) 2. District Collector, Adilabad District. 3. The Tahsildar, Sirpur Kagaz NagarMandal, Adilabad District. 4. The Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District. (The Respondents 2 to 4 made party with the permission of Hon`ble Court) … Respondents COUNSEL FOR APPLICANTS: Sri N. Indrasena Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1:Sri M. Anil Kumar for Official Liquidator Company Application under Rule 9 of the Companies Court Rules, 1959 r/w. Section 391 to 394 r/w. Sections 78, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of dispossession of the applicants from the property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.50 cents in Sy. No. 101 in Kosini Village of Kagaznagar Mandal, Adilabad District including house bearing No. 3-3-93/C, pending disposal of the above Company Application on the file of the High Court; The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case) ORDER: “Learned senior counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to implead the District Collector, Adilabad District, the Tahsildar, Sirpur Kagaznagar Mandal, Adilabad District and the Sub Collector and Special Officer, Sirpur Kagaznagar Adilabad District as respondents 2, 3 and 4. Permission is accorded. Notice to respondents 2,3 and 4. Personal service is permitted and petitioners counsel to file proof of service. Print the name of G.P. for Revenue for respondents 2 to 4. While the learned counsel for the Official Liquidator seeks time to get instructions and file report, the respondents 2 to 4 are directed not to undertake demolition of the premises, in question, till the matter is heard on 27-01-2014. List on 27-01-2014 by which date the petitioners to file proof of service and respondents 2 to 4 as well as the learned counsel for the Official Liquidator to file their reports”. JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ..2.. To 1. The Official Liquidator, High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the Liquidator of M/s. Sirsilk Limited (IN Liqn) 2. The District Collector, Adilabad District. 3. The Tahsildar, Sirpur Kagaz NagarMandal, Adilabad District. 4. The Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District. (ADDRESSEES 2 TO 4 5. Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 6. One CC to Sri M. Anil Kumar, counsel for the Official Liquidator (OPUC) 7. One CC to Sri N. Indrasena Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 8. One spare copy. Ksv HIGH COURT Ksv Date of drafting: 03-01-2014 VVAJ DATE: 03-01-2014 NOTE: POST ON 27-01-2014 ORDER COMPANY APPLICATION No. 7 OF 2013 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 57 OF 1999 DIRECTION