mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2906 OF 2009 Mohanlal Veerchand Parekh ... Petitioner versus Prabhakar Ambrushi Barbole & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. V.V. Purwant for petitioner Ms.S.V.Gajare APP for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 12th November 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Petition is directed against an interlocutory order and I am not inclined to interfere in the exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Furthermore, as held by the Learned Sessions Judge, the causes and scope of Criminal Application 99 of 2009 and criminal application nos.610 and 611 of 2009 are different. The learned Sessions Judge was therefore right in directing that both should be heard independently and not together. There is no merit in the writ petition which is hereby dismissed summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)