IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.3311 OF 2005 PETITION ST.NO.3311 OF 2005 PETITION ST.NO.3311 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 369 OF 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 18th March, 2005. : 18th March, 2005. : 18th March, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner is unable to point out whether the contentions which are sought to be raised in the Review Petition were raised before the first Appellate Court. A perusal of the points for determination framed by the first Appellate Court does not indicate that the said contentions were urged by the Appellant before the first Appellate Court. There is no error apparent on the face of the record and hence the Review petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.