IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 18755 of 2000 Between: ..... PETITIONER AND .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ } ORAL ORDER: None appears. Since the learned counsel for the petitioners was not present nor was there any representation on his behalf on 27-08-2008, writ petition is posted ‘for dismissal’ today. Today, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioners is not present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _______________ 28th August, 2008 SKM