IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 16935 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 15, 2010 Dinesh Kumar and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. D.S. Pheruman, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the respondents. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The petitioners have approached this Court with the grievance that the land belonging to them, as shown in rough sketch plan based on Shizra Aksh, described as Khasra No. 47/1 was released from acquisition but no passage was left to the released land. It was land-locked area. In the affidavit dated 9.3.2010, filed by Shri Arvind Mehtani, Senior Town Planner, Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation, it has been stated that as per the lay out plan, the land comprised in Khasra No. 47/1, which form part of the land reserved for commercial and institutional purposes, has been acquired. It has been decided by respondent No. 3-HSIIDC that a 16’-6” wide rasta (passage) C.W.P. No. 16935 of 2009 through Khasra No. 47/1 would be maintained so as to provide approach to the land of the petitioners, comprising in Khasra No. 47/10. A copy of the lay out plan showing the land of the petitioners along with the passage thereto has been placed on record as Annexure R/1. The aforesaid passage has been marked in light green colour on the site plan (R/1) attached with the affidavit. The other grievance of the petitioners is that they should not be dispossessed from the acquired land till the time the possession of the plot is handed over to them, if on consideration they are found entitled. In case the claim of the petitioners is rejected then they shall handover the vacant possession of the land in question to the respondents within one week from the date of receipt of such order of rejection. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the respondents shall remain bound by the statement made in the affidavit dated 9.3.2010, for granting passage and consideration of the claim of the petitioners for allotment of plot, as observed above. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) March 15, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2