1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.APPA 228 OF 2010. STATE OF MAH. THROUGH ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, NAGPUR. VS PRABHAKAR GOVINDRAO PAUNIKAR ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri V.A. Thakre, APP for applicant. Shri A. S. Mardikar Advocate for the respondent. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 29th March, 2010. 1. This is an appeal against acquittal by the State. 2. The accused respondent was tried for an offence punishable under Section 7, 13(1)(e) r/w Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 3. Learned Special Judge had arrived at the conclusions against the prosecution which are recorded in paragraph no.26 of the impugned judgment. 4. The charge was that the assets held by the accused were disproportionate, and were in excess of the legitimate sources than 2 Rs.6,10,585/-. The Court has found that the prosecution did not take into independent income of Smt. Sitabai – wife and Mr. Ashish the son, was not taken into account. 5. These findings are not shown to be erroneous and contrary to record. Therefore, this appeal does not call for interference. 6. In the result, the application and appeal are rejected. Judge |mule|