:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2005 Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd ..Petitioner vs. Mrs. Suraj Neelkanth Raskar and Ors. ...Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 1742 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1742 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1742 OF 2005 Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd ..Petitioner vs. Mrs. Shalini Neelkanth Raskar and Ors. ...Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 1679 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1679 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 1679 OF 2005 Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd ..Petitioner vs. Master Pranav Prasanna Raskar and Ors. ...Respondents P.S. Dani for the petitioner. Mr. D.A. Patil, AGP for State. S.A. Valsee for Respondent no.3. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 23RD DECEMBER, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. The order in revision dated 22.11.2004 directs that the objections to be considered under Rule :2: 107(19)(A) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rule, 1961 in the course of execution of an award passed under section 91 of the Maharashtra co-operative Societies Rule, 1961. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no reasons need to be given for passing the following order. 2. I am of the opinion that the order does not require interference in view of the fact that the issues raised can be expressly determined by the Recovery Officer under Rule 107(19)(A) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rule, 1961. All issues on merits are legally kept open to be determined by the said officer. The said Officer is directed to determine the objections raised by the Respondent no.1 within a period of 3 weeks from today and passed appropriate directions thereof. All the three writ petitions are disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs. sd/[ ***********