1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7401 OF 2008 Chandrakumar Tirthadas Goplani .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and another .. .. Respondents Shri A. P. Bhandari, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Kadam, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1, 3 to 6. Shri P. P. Chavan, Advocate for the Respondent No. 7 and 9. Shri K. P. Chawre, Advocate for the Respondent No. 8. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 03RD AUGUST, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ Per B. R. Gavai, J.] : 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition and seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with further liberty to make representation to the liquidator, raising his claim. 2 2. Since the liquidator has already taken over the charge of the respondent No. 7/bank, we do not propose to entertain the present petition. The petition is, therefore disposed of as withdrawn. 3. It is further made clear that, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation, so as to raise his claim before respondent No. 9. If such, claim is raised before respondent No. 9, the respondent No. 9 shall consider it in accordance with law. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/August 09