IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8481 of 2009 AMARNATH KUMAR SAO @ AMARNATH, son of Sri Kishori Sao, resident of village-Govindpur(Kali Asthan), P.S.-Fatuha, District- Patna---------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. no.10299 of 2009 Om Sao, son of Shri Kishori Sao, resident of village-Govindpur, P.S.- Fatuha, District-Patna-----------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus State of Bihar ------------------- 2. 9.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that only to pressurize business transactions with the informant this case has been lodged. Otherwise also in course of business if there was any dispute that never constitutes offence either under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code or under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code as mens ria lacks there. There is no document to corroborate from where the grains were unloaded and no witness to say that the petitioners were running the business of wheat. In my view also, allegation leveled against the petitioners does not justify their arrest. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Karpi P.S. case no.96 of 2008, the above named petitioners of the two petitions shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )