IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.181 of 2010 RAM PRASAD BHAGAT, S/O LATE BABU LAL BHAGAT, R/O HARIGANJ CHOWK, P.O. KATIHAR, P.S. KATIHAR, DISTT. KATIHAR. ----Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA NAMELY MR. B.P. SHARMMA, I.A.S. 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY ANJANI KUMAR SINGH. 3. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY DHANANJAY KUMAR . 4. THE B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY MADHEPURA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, NAMELY KUMARESH PRASAD SINGH, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. 5. SHREE RIPUSUDAN PRASAD SRIVASTAVA, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 6. SHREE KUMARESH PRASAD SINGH S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 7. SHREE RAJ KISHORE PRASAD SINGH, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA. 8. SHREE SURESH PRASAD YADAV, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PRINCIPAL, D.S. COLLEGE, KATIHAR. ---Opp. Parties. ----------- 4. 1.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party-University. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the University stating therein that the order of this Court has been complied with by passing a reasoned order dated 24th of July, 2010 on the - 2 - representation of the petitioner and necessary payments have been made to him. The said reasoned order has been communicated to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although payments as indicated in the order have been made to the petitioner, however, interest over the delayed payment of pension as also the gratuity has not been paid as per the statutes, besides the gratuity has not been correctly calculated. Considering the submissions of the parties, since the order of this Court has substantially been complied with, the contempt application need not proceed further. However, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the concerned authority of the University with regard to his further claim, which, according to the petitioner, still subsists. If such claim is filed, it goes without saying that the same shall be considered expeditiously. The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)