Crl. W. P. No. 1471 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. W. P. No. 1471 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 23, 2011 Paramjit Kaur .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : None. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Telegram sent by Paramjit Kaur to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court has been registered as instant criminal writ petition and listed on judicial side. It is alleged in the telegram that petitioner's husband Bhupinder Singh was illegally taken into custody by police of Police Station Khalchian on 10.07.2011 and has been detained by the police illegally. In reply filed on behalf of State of Punjab, averments made in the telegram were denied. It was alleged that petitioner's husband Bhupinder Singh is neither wanted in any case of Police Station Khalchian Crl. W. P. No. 1471 of 2011 2 nor detained in the Police Station or or after 10.07.2011. Reply be way of affidavit of concerned SHO, filed today in Court regarding service of notice on the petitioner pursuant to order of this Court, is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Averments made in the telegram have been denied in this reply as well. It is also further mentioned in the reply filed today that ASI Boota Singh, accompanied by Jaspal Singh and Manjit Singh, went to inform the petitioner for her appearance in this Court, but she refused to accept the message. Statements of Jaspal Singh and Manjit Singh have also been annexed with the reply, wherein they have stated that petitioner and her husband Bhupinder Singh are residing at their house. None has appeared for the petitioner in spite of service of notice on her in the aforesaid manner, which is valid service. On the other hand, from the statements annexed with the reply, it appears that petitioner's husband Bhupinder Singh is residing with the petitioner. Averments made in the telegram have been denied by the State in the reply. In view of the aforesaid, no further order or action is required in the instant criminal writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. September 23, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE