IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.04.2009 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.Nos.30189 & 30190 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.36640 & 36641 of 2004 Mrs.H.Vijayalakshmi .. Petitioner in both the WPs vs The Executive Officer, Porur Town Panchayat, Porur, Chennai-600 116. .. Respondent in both the WPs Writ Petition No.30189 of 2004 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the application dated 13.08.2004 for plan sanction in regard to Plot No.54, 55 & 56 in Survey No.5/4, 5/3 Sapthagiri Nagar, Porur, Chennai-116 without insisting for production of NOC from Tamil Nadu Housing Board. Writ Petition No.30190 of 2004 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the application dated 12.07.2004 for plan sanction in regard to Plot No.7 in Survey No.4/3, Sapthagiri Nagar, Porur, Chennai-116 without insisting for production of NOC from Tamil Nadu Housing Board. For Petitioner in both WP's : Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondents in both WP's : Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, AGP ORDER These writ petitions have been filed for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the applications of the petitioner, dated 13.08.2004 and 12.07.2004, for plan sanction in respect of Plot Nos.54, 55 & 56 in Survey Nos.5/4, 5/3 and Plot No.7 in Survey No.4/3, respectively, in Sapthagiri Nagar, Porur, Chennai, without insisting on the production of a No-Objection Certificate from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. 2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that several orders have been passed by this Court https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ directing the concerned town panchayat to consider the applications for plan sanction without insisting for the production of a No- Objection Certificate from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. One such order has been passed by a learned single Judge of this Court, in W.P.No.15 of 2009. 3.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had not refuted the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4.Hence, the Respondent is directed to consider the applications of the petitioner, dated 13.08.2004 and 12.07.2004, for plan sanction in respect of Plot Nos.54, 55 and 56 in Survey Nos.5/4, 5/3 and Plot No.7 in Survey No.4/3, respectively, in Sapthagiri Nagar, Porur, Chennai, without insisting on a No-Objection Certificate from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. 5.Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ssv To The Executive Officer, Porur Town Panchayat, Porur, Chennai-600 116. +2 ccs to Mr. Srinath Sridevan, Advocate, SR.No.18433 & 18434) W.P.Nos.30189 & 30190 of 2004 MSM(CO) SRA 15/05/09 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/