IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 200 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2011 SHRI RAMESH K. GAD ... Applicant Versus SHRI LAXMIKANT A. RAIKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri C.A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.2. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 17th October, 2011 P.C.: Heard Shri Arun Bras De Sa, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and Shri C.A. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2. 2. The above petition challenges the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge dated 30/08/2011 whereby the appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed. The applicant was found guilty of having committed an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and, accordingly, was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a term of two months and also directed to pay compensation in the sum of Rs.1 lac and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner/applicant states that the applicant is prepared to deposit the said sum of Rs.1 lac and, according, to him he has a good case on merits to assail the impugned judgment and as such prays for the suspension of the substantive sentence of imprisonment. In any event, the learned Counsel states that the applicant is prepared to compound the matter with the respondents. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the impugned judgment is suspended subject to the applicant executing a bail bond of Rs.15,000/- with a surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The applicant shall also deposit the said sum of Rs.1 lac in this Court at the time of the execution of the said bail bond. 5. Application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. NH