IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2822 of 2009 BIJAY BHUSHAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 2 01.09.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant application has been filed for alleged violation of order of this court dated passed in C.W.J.C.No. 9606/2009 in which it had been observed that if he petitioner files representation, the same would be disposed of preferably within two weeks from the date of receipt of order with further direction that tender in question would not be finalized till disposal of representation above. Show cause filed by Executive engineer, RWD, Saharsa dated 27.11.2009 states that the Superintending Engineer on 16.7.2009 had issued direction for preparation of comparative statement of both the bidders, namely, the petitioner and the Jai Mata Di Construction. In pursuance thereof, the deponent prepared a comparative statement and submitted to the S.E. on 5.8.2009 in which it was apparent that petitioner quoted 3.5 percent less rate, whereas latter Constructions agency quoted 15 percent less rate. As such, work order to Jai Mata Di Constructions was issued. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that deponent had no information regarding the order of the court passed on 17.8.2009, as no order/letter had been received in his office on 17.8.2010, therefore work order was issued on 2 17.8.2009 in favour of Jai Mata Di Constructions. In view of above, this Court does not find that there is deliberate violation of order of this court. The instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge any subsequent action of respondents, if he is so aggrieved. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)