-Y IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH ^c^-&-_ CONTEMPT E^H¥eir[C] N0. 39^- of 2011 "li'-f.^ ''S-^''^ s S'Yi' "-''-i^ .'a £^wfc. n APPLICANTS pR . piQSSi-'- OiKS3"1 1. Sandeep Verma, S/o Late Shri Ambika Charan Verma, aged 41 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Sanitary Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh R/o SB-5, Sri Sai Vihar, Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar, New Purena, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Gopi Chand Dewangan, S/o Late Shri Awadh Ram Dewangan, aged 46 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Sanitary Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh R/o Lakhe Nagar, Infront of Surjeet Cycle Store, Mahadev Ghat Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Rajendra Kumar Soni, S/o Late Shri Sonal Lal Soni, aged 50 years, Occupation-Service, presently working as Sanitary Inspector, Municipal Corporation, r:: Raipur, Chhattisgarh R/o Qtr No.625, Purani Basti, Bandhwapara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh A RESPONDENT Conteninor vs Shri Rajesh Sukumar Toppo, Commissioner, Municipal C^orporation, Raipur, Malvi Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. CONTEMPT PETITION ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2011 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION IS1 N0.2316/2011'^BETWEEN SANDEEP VERMA & OTHERS VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS ^ 7=r r, 'g'fflTFTe', TsCTWy Cffld.:.Q?^.)^3?..2// ai^^tfiFiW 'Bqtair^TaPlN; -.-..- L- g|^S 'avfi (Tpiy^i) ^Tqf?rah wv^ ^ 'fe'a d^CTR * .afRrri sn^s SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moh^n Shrivastava, J. 11-11-2011 Shri Malay Shrivastava, couitsel for the petitioners. l-1eard. Learned counsel for the peti 16-06-2011 passed by this Court petition was finally disposed respondent/contemnor to consid^r the case of the petitioners in accordance with the policy of regi^larization dated 05-03-2008 and the judgment of the Supreme Court i^i the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Uma D^vi (3) and others, (2006) 4 SCC 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners Court was communicated to the re| 28-06-2011, and thereafter, the S| |submits that the order passed by the ^pondents vide representation dated tate Government vide memo dated that the respondent was directed to| for regularization. Though, no sp^ reasonable time and the matter c time. Taking into consideration th that it may involve consideration of tioners submits that vide order dated n W.P.(S)No.2316 of 2011, the writ off with a direction to the 23-07-2011 also informed the resp|ondents to comply with the order of the Court, but till date, no decision ii)) the matter has been taken. A perusal of the order passe)! by this Court on 16-06-2011 shows consider the claim of the petitioners cific time limit has been fixed, the order passed by the Court, is req|jired to be complied wjth, within a nnot be kept undecided for a long ^nature of exercise required to be undertaken in the matter of consid^ration of claim of regularization, and more than one person including the petitioners, instead of issuing noti^e at present, this petition is finally ·imT.BR ^•<ig?!i7»RT,(Wii?ira—ys/i4o—2/2011—i,50,poo. ^ i ^ ^i^^IF^?^ ^ '•1'1'-. 'tSs1: •f;^B- .-s'' TST "^qTqRTlT, '^TnTpTiS', fsRTOy •' <. P^E) sn^wSFn^ wncRA'ng^iN; ^aiwgftti snt?i z-1 •iiTqfeR^ 3FTCB i[ -fe€!'sfsf^K ^" 3Ite sfi^m Tumane been complied with, serious vie' contempt proceedings would be ini disposed off, observing that if the r^spondents does not comply with the order of the Court within a periojl of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, the p|etitioners would be at liberty to revive the contempt petition and if it is foitid that the order of the Court has not )v of the matter will be taken and jiated against the respondents. )^ /- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^