1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 497/2009 Mahadeo Satwa Vatkar & 0rs. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Jaydeep D.Mane for the applicants Mr.Kharge,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 7th October,2009 P.C. . Heard finally by consent. 1] This Revision application is filed against the concurrent finding of conviction by the learned Additional Sessions Judge ,Pandharpur and the J.M.F.C.,Pandharpur convicting the applicants/accused for the offence punishable u/s 324 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that all the four accused are taken in custody on the date when the appeal was decided. 2] It is the concurrent finding confirming the order of conviction for the offence punishable u/s 324 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. I do not find any illegality in the judgment and order of the learned Sessions Judge. 2 3] The learned counsel for the applicants/accused submits that at this stage he is not challenging the finding of the conviction, however, prays that as the accused have undergone imprisonment for two months of total sentence of three months the period of sentence be reduced. 4] By consent considering the evidence and facts of this case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants/accused the Revision Application is disposed of with following order. A] The Revision Application is partly allowed. B] The sentence of conviction is maintained. C] The sentence of three months is reduced to the period of imprisonment which the applicants/accused have undergone. D] The applicants/accused be released forthwith in this case. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)