IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4254 of 2010 Smt. Shakuntala Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 2 18.10.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the order of the Court has been complied with and necessary payments have been made. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although payments have been made, however the payment on account of group insurance and gratuity has been made after good delay, and as such, the petitioner is entitled to payment of interest. Besides the above, it is submitted that the department has recovered a sum of Rs. 19900/- from the retiral dues which was not justified in law and petitioner proposes to bring to the notice of the concerned authority for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Considering the submissions as also the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. However, in case petitioner brings the aforesaid grievances to the notice of the concerned authority, the same may be looked into in accordance with law. The MJC application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)