THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.3168 of 2005 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the third respondent in dismissing the petitioner without following the procedure established by law, as unconstitutional and consequently direct the second respondent to call for the records produced by third respondent. There is no necessity of going into all the details. After elaborate arguments advanced by the learned counsel for petitioner, it came to light that the writ petition in this shape is not maintainable and therefore, the learned counsel seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition permitting the petitioner to invoke alternative remedy of filing a Claim Petition under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the appropriate Tribunal/Labour Court. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn permitting the petitioner to file Claim Petition under Section 2-A(2) of the I.D. Act before the appropriate Tribunal/Labour Court. On filing such claim petition, the same shall be entertained and decided by the Labour Court on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 7.4.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.3168 of 2005 7.4.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.3168 of 2005 Date: 7th April , 2010 Between: Chinnaswam Gandhi .. Petitioner And The Sub-Inspector of Police, Narsingi Police Station, Rajendranagar Madal, R.R. district & others. .. Respondents