Sing?e Bench IW^^ U- \a^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S) No. ^/E;^ of 2011 PETTTEONER ^y^.' ^%~^-^' '•:y ..-T t RESPONDENTS 2. Kameshwar Singh, S/o Atma Singh, aged about 50 years, Headmaster, (Sovt. Girls Primary School, Petala, Block-Sitapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary, Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Distn'ct Education Officer, • Distt. Surguja (C.G.) ^3. Block Education Officer, Block , Sitapur, Distt. -Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETCTEON UN&ER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTEON OF INQIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRFT QR MANbAMUS/OIRECTEON OFOTHER APPROPRIATE WRFT. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISe&RH AT BILASPUR • tafwa^^v w eu'oir -iTTCMr*tr^is i • W.P.fSlNO. 6159/2011 Versus Kaineshwar Singh State of C.O. & Others WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 O? THB CONSTITUTION OF ISDIA Appearaace: Shri Aiul Siagh Rajput, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bfaaskar Pyasi, P.L. for fhe State. ORAL QRDER (17.10.2011$ With the consent oftbe pardes, fhe matter is heard finasly. The petitioner was initiaUy appoiated as Assistant T'eacher in the year 1981 on a fixed pay of Rs. 150. Afier complction of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scate ofRs. 169-300. Learaed counsel for the petttioner subnuts tttat the above issue has been considered by fh.e M.P. State Admiaistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 betweeu Madbukant Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. aad ofhers, whereia it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entifled to regular pay scale witti effect froia fhe date ofinitial appoiatinent. The laatter was takcn up to ftie Hon'ble Suprenie Court. The appeal was disnussed by fhe Hon'ble Supreine Court upholding fh.e decision of the Tribunal to fhe efFect that fhe Teachers/AssistantTeachers are entifled to regular pay scale from fhe date of initial appointnient. It is further subinitted fhat fhis Court while coasideruig fhe sauie issue in W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006 between Anuxr Scd Ram & Others Vs. State of Chhaitssgarh and Others by order dated 01.09.06 atlowed fhe petitioners to niake a representation wifhiu a period often days, raisiug aB fhe grievaaces. jj Accordiiigly the petitioner is graiited Uberty to inake a representation raisuig all his grievances iu fhe Ught of the aforesaid judgment aad fhe circular dated 27.12.2008 & 5.1.2011 (Aimexure P/4 & P/5), and in tura fhe concemed respondent is directed to decide the represeatation, if any, in accoidance wifh law, on ite own nierits, wifhin. a period of eight weeks froiu fhe date of receipt of tbe representation subject to verification ofthe facts. In view of fhe foregoiag, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritiitker Diwaker .Judge