Sr. No. Orders IN THE ItrGH COURT OF DELItr AT NEW DELIII w.P.(c) 5964t2O03 EX-NAIK SANWAT RAM ..... Petitiorrr Though Mr. M. K. Gaur, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajinder Nischal, Advocate. CORAIttr HON'BI,E MR" JUS'ilCEMT]KUL MI'DGAL TION'BT.E MR" JUSTICE ILR. MALITOITRA ORDER 9o 24.08.2005 1. Rule D-8. Wirh the coosent of the leamed counsel for the parties, the unit petition is taken up fmfinal heaing. 2. By ttris writ petition ttre petitioner pays for issue o-f urit of mandamus against the respondent to restore the service pension of the gntitioner for the Period from t3th Augrist, 1963 to 31't August, t9?E and grant of pension for DSC Service fq tre period tom 1d September, 1978 to 3Ld August, zfffJ,. It is also pleaded in the writ petition that the petitircner had not been granted the optioo under O-M- dated 3'd uol a oRs. Mrch, 1983. 3. AUGUST ?A,2OO5 ld(b The counter affidairit filed by the respondent abbe,(es the option exercised by the petitioner onZd Apnil, 1983 by which his qption under the said O.M. dated 3d March, 1983, has been exercised. In ttris view of the matter! no further relief cao be claimed by the petitioner. The writ petitiron is thus dismissed as having become infrrrcnrous. All pending applications also stand disposed of- MUI( ^^1., -f) UL MUDGAL,J rl H.R. MALHOIIRA,J TERS 01r05 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified