1?%?^ ,..^.S^"V .^% ^ i ^^^^^^^^^^^^t '"^•0<p< : JN THEHIGHCOUR'FOFOTEieATURECHHAmSGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.NO W^-r'.2005 SlNCitBBENCN Petitioners t) 2^ Resoondents 1) / G \?ssdst • ^^"'~' : : 3) Inderpal Singh, S/o Shri Surendra Singh.AgedabOT.it .3 lyeaTS. ' Smt. ^l'ieelawatt, W/o ©hanan Singh,Aged about 85 years. (Both,R/o.C-41, Sector-4, Devendra Nagar, RaipurfC.G.) Versus State pf Ghhaftisgarh: Throygh the Secretary, Urban Deyelopinerit Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C-G-)-: ;.,.1'-:''.:.,^ The Municipal Corporation Raipur- Through . its Comraissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur ^•Q^ ::. .;.:.'.:: - -:': ;;:1;::'.. RaipuEY ©e^lQRinent^^Ltothon^ Throug&^ifs, ©hieE;3§xecnitrye^(^ -G.E.RoadiRaipur^tC.Gl.j^' WRTT PETITIONUNDERAR'E[CLE22ia!22'E©E'TM@ CONSTITUnONOFINDIA' XI-HC-22 an^r^r (d.-litl) 3TI^?T Vf^9 SfilWi •TSf '<<NI<1<<, ®Tfl<+'l<o,(sK-lltiy HTi-lcfTsniicti 3TI^TiT?W , . ^.^^...m^l^ a'n^TSTcTRRtrfsa' 15-6-2(M5 Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. AdyocartB for the petitioners. Shri yashwont Slngh, 6^ Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sri <=bi<ilfi<11-i tiiticiTitte':3'<rSi«i< ^3Tf^T3f^?T Advocate with Shri ©.Mukhopaelhyaya, [A. tnkes notice for respondent No.l. I. Advowite wi'th My Scngeeta Mishra, Advo<ate takes notice for rea^oridentsNo.2 emd 3. Heard. WiTh •the consent of ^ounsel for •the poa'Ttes Itiis petition is passed by this Court- in W.P. being di^}oseel of on the sa(ne terms of the order doted 4-3-2008 f^o.2082/2004. Aceordingly, •Ae petition w disposed of wi-th a direcljion Ihat the petitioners are altowed to make a detailed represen-iati^n raisin9 alt their points and grievances to The R&A within a pertod of sholl decide +he representatijm of the petitioners within two months from the date of receipt petitioners already ocquired, 3/idira Sandhi Commerciat C 10 ctays from today cnd m turn, The R&A of the same in an objective manner consicterjng all Ihe points r^ised by the petitioners. If tiie R&A reaches to the conckision tho^- in view of •the RDA's policy decision Ihe petitioners are entitted for 40% land in exchange of tha land of the •then they can consitler 1+ie claim of the petitioners for allotment of 40% iand preferably, if avaihble, in inplex, Oevendra Nagcsr, Safpur or any other land whidi is mxeptabJB.to the petitioners. In case, partiailar . (q^^fg^) XI-HC-22 S^ •<l|t||Ct<<, ^Tily'lti, !«1111<iy< 3Ti^?riTCw llHMlstiiian """"""""'"" W]; 200 ft^s;"""""""" ^sn^TrsRT T^-ira sn^r ^nN;Hf?? +i'ii(ci'ifl-i t^Wcff?' ts^S <Ri^i< i; sri^nT aii^T Barve lond 'is not available, then ft&A can conskler the allotment of o-rtier lond in consultation with the tetitioners. Consequently, M.(W.yf. No.1762/2005 and I.A. No.4263/2005 also stand disposed of. PartiesareentiTledfotcertifiedcopyoflhisorder. ___ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge