IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11798 of 2010 SANJAY YADAV, SON OF PRABHU PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395, 412 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The Informant has alleged that his truck was intercepted by a Bolero Jeep and two trucks and a robbery was committed. His truck was also taken away by the miscreants. Thereafter, when the matter was intimated on the wireless, the Bolero vehicle was intercepted and two persons were arrested with Arms. One of the trucks which was used in the dacoity was also intercepted and the petitioner was found sitting on the seat. This obviously shows the complicity of the petitioner in the present occurrence. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the seriousness of the nature of the offence. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)