THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.8435 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner/A2 questions registration of F.I.R. in this case relating to offences under Sections 468, 474, 120-B and 420 IPC. The petitioner without impleading the de facto complainant seeks quashing of F.I.R. in this case. 2. In the report, the de facto complainant, who is the Task Force Sub-Inspector of Police, states that his enquiries revealed that the accused claiming themselves as Chairman and Director etc., floated three institutions under the names of Golconda Vidya Parishad, Golconda National Universe and National Institute of Secondary Education with their respective web sites and that those institutions are not affiliated to any University nor recognized by University Grants Commission and that the accused gave lucrative advertisements in Deccan Chronicle offering 100% pass guarantee for one sitting courses like Diploma, Under Graduation, Post Graduation, under several schemes of studies like Arts, Commerce, Science, Engineering, Veterinary, Agriculture, Business Management and Health Sciences by conducting formal examinations with lab facilities and preparing fake educational pass certificates and that nearly 250 candidates joined with the accused. 3. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the Task Force Sub-Inspector of Police conducted panchanama and other activity even prior to registration of the case. The de facto complainant, who is the Task Force Sub- Inspector of Police, did not make the said exercise during the course of any investigation, but during the course of suo motu enquiry on the basis of advertisement given by the accused in Deccan Chronicle newspaper. Value of the said evidences collected by the de facto complainant prior to registration of the case in the police station, is a question which has to be urged at the time of final arguments of the case after trial by the lower court after institution of charge sheet in this crime, in order to judge weight to be attached to that part of evidence collected prior to investigation. This is too earlier stage for this Court to consider the said aspect. It is evident that the intention of the petitioner is only to stall investigation into grave allegations in F.I.R. There are no grounds to interfere in the matter under Section 482 Cr.PC. 4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. __________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J September 16, 2011. LMV THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.8435 OF 2011 16.09.2011 LMV