IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT APPEAL NO : 778 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in WP No : 844 of 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Suvvari Appanna, S/o. Sriramulu, Hindu, Korlakota Village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... APPELLANT AND The District Collector, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.B.M.PATRO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following J U D G M E N T: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ): Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is nothing, prima facie, on record to show that an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- was released under ‘Food for Work’ scheme and not an amount of Rs.1,30,000/-. In these circumstances, we do not think that any interference is called for with the order of learned Single Judge. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ (Bilal Nazki, ACJ) 19th April, 2005. _________________ (Dr.G.Yethirajulu,J) vrn To 1. The District Collector, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 2. Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 3 Two C.D copies