1 rast26246.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.26246 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5116 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. Prashant Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 9TH MARCH, 2011 Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. Perused the grounds in the Writ Petition. Learned Counsel for review applicant has submitted that the trial Court has committed error and also by this Court in observing that, by allowing the application for amendment filed by applicant, nature of the suit will change. In fact, there is no question of change in nature of the main suit. 3. I have given due consideration to 2 rast26246.09 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders the submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant-petitioner. Perused pleadings of the review application. There are no specific grounds taken in the review application. Grounds which are agitated by learned Counsel for the review applicant, were agitated at the time of argument of writ petition and those grounds are taken in the writ petition. Nothing has been brought to the notice of this Court, which was not considered at the time of entertaining the writ petition or inadvertently, was not within knowledge of the petitioner. Therefore, this review application is misconceived. No ground is made out for maintaining this Review Application. Hence, same stands rejected. [ S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/Mar11/rast26246.09