Criminal Revision No. 1093 of 1989 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 1093 of 1989 Date of Decision: 29.01.2008. S.S. Bhatia …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Jaspreet Singh Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for the State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In case FIR No. 101 dated 14.11.1988, when the charge was to be framed, learned Public Prosecutor conceded before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, that no evidence is available against Jodh Singh, father-in-law of Maninder Kaur. Considering the entire evidence, learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, discharged Jodh Singh, father-in-law, and framed charge against Inderjit Singh, husband. Since Inderjit Singh was charged for an offence under Section 304-B IPC on 5.9.1989, the trial qua him may have concluded. Once the learned Public Prosecutor conceded that there was Criminal Revision No. 1093 of 1989 2 no evidence against Jodh Singh, father-in-law and he was discharged, after 20 years, there is no material before the revisional Court to interfere. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 29, 2008 “DK”