IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42934 of 2008 MAHESH MAHTO S/O-Sikdev Mahto @ Sukhdev Mahto @ Baleshwar Mahto, R/O-Village-Chamtha Balupar, P.S.- Bachhwara, Distt.-Begusarai…………………………………………………….……Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24.10.2008 Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para-8 of the brief. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is accused of a case which has been registered under Sections 302, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act regarding killing of the informant’s father by the accused persons. The informant received information in the next morning that his father has been shot dead. According to the First Information Report the informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence. The order of the Sessions Judge shows that the case diary contained two sets of evidence – one was that the informant informed about the killing and another set was there was chance of false implication. Submission is that the deceased himself was notorious criminal and was wanted in various cases. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Mahesh Mahto is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties - 2 - of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Dalsingsarai (Samastipur) in connection with Vidyapati P.S. Case No. 59 of 2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)