IN TPIE HIGH COURT. OP JUDJC^TUTiE AT ! JAB.ALPUR. W.P.SO._ ^jLf^ OF 1999. ^ PETITIONER RESPOKDENT ^ Mahant Rambali DQS^ Sar^arQkar^ Shri RadhaKrishna Math Manair^ Kawardha, District KMQSDHA. (K. P. ) Versus» " State of Madhya Pradesh^Ythrough th° Oollector,_KAWARDHA. (M.P<) • £E^TI^gN_UNDER ARTId,E-22,6/227 -OP\^ON^TITUnON__OF_INDIA, ^•ws.wsiaM ii^\ ^. '^ 'f^A i\\\ HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRtT PETITiON N0,2146 OF 1999 ^ Petltloner Mahant RambaSI Das Versus ResDonderit State of Madhya Pradesh - WRIT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satlsh K. Agnlhotri, J.) Present:- Shrl Anup JVIajumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State» (ORAL) (Passed on thls 08th day of August, 2011) lAJMoJ, This Is an application for of the ¥mt petltlon on the grounds therein. • Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objeetion. Appilcation Is ordered as for, Conseqyentjy, the wrlt petition is dismlssed'as w.Jthdra¥/n, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^shok'