Criminal Misc.-M No. 30184 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 30184 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.10.2011 Jagdish and others .. Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. N. S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G. S. Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were earlier arrested and released on bail by the court below, as all the injuries were found to be simple in nature. Offence under Section 307 IPC was added more than four months after the date of occurrence. The injury is attributed to Manoj, however, he was found to be innocent during enquiry. He further submitted that the petitioners as well as the complainant are neighbours and compromise has been entered into between the parties. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that in the supplementary statement of Mukesh recorded on 13.7.2011, he had alleged injury on his head by Manoj with an axe. However, on enquiry by Deputy Superintendent of Police and considering the medico-legal report, Manoj was found innocent as the injury did not match with the allegations made by Mukesh against Manoj. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above and also the fact that offence under Section 307 IPC was added more than four months after the registration of the FIR and the alleged injury is not attributed to any one of the petitioners, in my Criminal Misc.-M No. 30184 of 2011 [2] opinion, they are not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. They are directed to appear before Investigating Officer on 31.10.2011 at 10.00 AM for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 17.10.2011 mk