HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ~WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 391 OF 3909 ; Ashwml Kumar Verma age 36$years * S/o Shn C P Verma R/o Kukaradeeh Police Station Tumgaon Dlsmct Mahasamund (CG) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Regional Transport Authority Ralpur' (CG) (Writ petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble shri Satish K.«Agnihntri,4.l. PETITIONER RESPONDENT Present :- Shri Uttam Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 22"“ day of January. was) r With the consent of learned counsel appearing for theparties, the petition is heard tinally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner submits that the petitioner has tiled applications for grant of permit before the respondent on 7-9-2007' (Annexure-PM) and on 1&8—2008 (Annexure-PI2), which, are still pending consideration. 3) Learned counsel appearing forthe State/respondent submits that there is no reason asto why the applicationspf the petitioner, as stated above, should not be considered within reasonable time i.e. 15 days from the date of tiling of the applications. Leamed counsel further submits that the above-stated applications. shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a periodot three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) in view of the clear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the Statelrespondent,. according to leamed counsel for the petitioner nothing remains in this petition for,adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petitionstandsdiSposed of ‘ Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri x Judge Gowri "