IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4490 of 2010 1. SATYA DEO PRASAD, SON OF LATE YAMUNA PRASAD, 2. SHANTI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI SATYA DEO PRASAD 3. PAWAN KUMAR @ CHUNNU @ PANNU, SON OF SRI SATYA DEO PRASAD 4. PRAVIN KUMAR @ PRAVEEN ANAND @ CHOTI, SON OF SRI SATYA DEO PRASAD 5. PANKAJ KASHYAP, SON OF SRI SATYA DEO PRASAD ALL ARE RESIDENT AT MOHALLA, “SHANTI BHAWAN” BAHADUR PUR, MAIN ROAD KANKARBAGH, NEAR BIHAR MOTOR WORKS, P.O. LOHIA NAGAR, P.S. PATRAKAR NAGAR, DISTT. PATNA – 800 020 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MRS PUJA, DAUGHTER OF SRI RAM NAGINA CHAUDHARY, RESIDES AT MOHALLA, SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR, ROAD NO. 2, HANUMAN NAGER, P.O. LOHIA NAGAR, P.S. PATRAKAR NAGAR, DISTT. PATNA. – 800 020 ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3. 16.09.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the First Information Report bearing Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2009 instituted for the offence under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that now the petitioner has arrived at a settlement which is apparent from Annexure-8 filed on behalf of the petitioners. In pursuance to the direction contained therein, the petitioners are handing over a Cheque of Rs. 4,50,000/- to the Opposite Party No. 2 bearing Cheque No. 535667 dated 27.8.2010 of Bank of Baroda in token of which the counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2 is affixing its certificate on the margin of the ordersheet. 2 The counsel for the Informant has also supported the stand of the petitioners that now they have arrived at a settlement. In view of such, the First Information Report bearing Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2009 lodged against the petitioners is hereby quashed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)