IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 1481 of 2000 Between: Velicheti Papa Rao son of V.Ramakrishna Rao Village Adminstrative Officer, Palangi Village UnderJavaram Mandal W.G.Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Secretary of Govt . Revenue (VO ) Department The Govt of AP Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector Eluru, West Godavari Dist 3 The Joint Collector O/o the collectorate Eluru, W.G.Dist 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Unrajavarm Mandal, West Godavari Dist 5 The Registrar, AP. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or direction, order or Writ, more particulalry one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for continuing his services as Village Administrative Officer Palangi Group of Village, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari district by passing an order on his representations dated. 15/12/1999 till today is arbitrary, unreasonable, andconsequently direct the respondent No. 1, to consider the case of the petitioner for continuation of his services as Village Administrative Officer to Palangi Group of Village, Undrajavaram Mandal, W.G.District till the issuance of Notification for filling up the said post on permanent basis by taking into consideration of the orders passed by the principal Secretary to Govt., of AP. Revenue Department vide Memo. No. 90885/VO-2/98-1, dt. 4/01/1998 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri Justice GHULAM MOHAMMED) When the matter was called on 17.2.2009 none appeared and there was also no representation. Hence the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ______________________________ SANJAY KUMAR , J Dt. 19.2.2009 KA ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Secretary of Govt . Revenue (VO ) Department The Govt of AP Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector Eluru, West Godavari Dist 3 The Joint Collector O/o the collectorate Eluru, W.G.Dist 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Unrajavarm Mandal, West Godavari Dist 5 The Registrar, AP. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad 6. 2 CCs to G.P. for Services-I1, High Court of A.P. Buildings, Hyderabad 7. 2 CD copies