g IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MACA No. 40/2010 RADHA DEVI Date of Decision: September 29, 2010 .....Appellant through Mr. R N Singh, Advocate , VETSUS ARUN KUMAR SAINI AND ANR. ..... Respondents through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA 1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? Without going into the merits of the case, the learned counsel for the appellant states that he will be satisfied if a sum of { 2,000/- in addition to the sum of < 2,5001- already awarded under the head - 'loss of income', is awarded to the appellant. ln this view of the matter, the Insurance company is directed to pay a further sum of < 2,000/- to the appellant within four weeks along with interest thereon @ 7.5o/o per annum from the date of filing of the petition. With this direction, the appeal is disposed of. SEPTEMBER 29, 2O1O PC. Page L of3 rD MACA No.40/2010 Signing Date:12.08.2024 17:00:54 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified