IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 968 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 968 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 968 OF 2006 1. Vijay Anna Pawar & 12 ors. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. The SRA & 5 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Anil J. Rege for the petitioners. Mr. Milind More, AGP, for the respondent No.1. Mr. P.K. Samdani, senior counsel i/b Shah & Sanghvi for respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 19TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : . The SRA Scheme was sanctioned in 1995. 2. It is a case of the petitioners herein that since their claim was rejected, they have preferred Appeals which are pending with SRA and the Appeals have not been disposed of. Considering the above, we direct respondent No.1 that if the Appeals preferred by the petitioners herein are still pending, to dispose of those Appeals within 12 weeks from today. Copy of the : 2 : order being served by the petitioners on SRA. Rule made absolute accordingly. Sd/- [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] Sd/- [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]