1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY C IVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 104 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 58 OF 20008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APEAL NO. 59 OF 2008 Uday Mahadeo Tamboskar .. Applicant. V/s. Mrs. Apurva Uday Tamboskar .. Respondent. Mr. S.S. Dubey for the Applicant-husband. Mr. S.C. Thatte for the Respondent-wife. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : 19TH JULY, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this application, the applicant-husband prays for stay of operation of the impugned judgment and order requiring the applicant to pay maintenance amount to the wife in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- per month towards accommodation charges and further sum of Rs. 4000/- and 3000/- per month each to the children (total 3 children). In other words, the applicant is liable to pay aggregate amount of 2 Rs. 23,000/- per month to the respondent-husband. It is submitted that the applicant is willing to pay monthly maintenance as was agreed before the lower Court even during the pendency of this appeal. It is stated that the applicant used to pay sum of Rs. 20,000/- per month to the respondent-wife. If so, we decline to grant stay as prayed by the applicant in as much as the increase by virtue of impugned decision is only to the extent of Rs. 3000/- per month. The lower Court has recorded reasons for determining the said amount payable by the applicant towards maintenance on monthly basis. Accordingly, both these applications are rejected. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)