IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2873 of 2011 Diksheet Ravesh Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Surender Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has already been selected. His grievance is that the criteria, which has been adopted, is vague. The counsel would submit that some better criteria could have been adopted and the petitioner primarily has gone down in merit because of the criteria being what it is. It is for the respondent-department to fix a criteria before making a selection. That criteria would equally apply to all the candidates. Apparently, there is no vagueness in the criteria as formed and as such there is no case made out for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. February 16, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE