WP(C) 5198/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr.A.D.Choudhury learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Als o heard Mr.M.K.Misra learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Ms. R.Bora learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department as well as Ms.M.Bordoloi learned St anding Counsel, BTC. The service of the petitioner has been terminated by order dated 19.1.20 09. Mr Choudhury submits that in the present proceeding, the order of terminatio n is not under challenge. However, he submits that the authority should pay the admissible arrear salary to the petitioner, to which he is entitled. Mr.Choudhur y further submits that the petitioner had worked up to August, 2009 as the termi nation order was not served to the petitioner till then. Ms.Bordoloi, learned St anding Counsel, BTC submits that in some other similar writ petitions, this cour t has passed order to verify such claim and then to pay the admissible salary, s ubject to the condition that necessary budgetary provision is made by the State Government. Mr.Misra, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, confirms t he said position. In view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsel appearing f or the parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing the BTC authority to verify the case of the petitioner in respect of his claim for payment of salary up to August, 2009. If upon such verification, it is found that the petitioner is entitled to receive any arrear salary, same may be paid to the petitioner, su bject to the condition that budgetary provision is made by the State Government. Entire exercise shall be carried out as expeditiously as possible, prefe rably within four months from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order to the appropriate authority. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations and directi ons. However, there shall be no order as to costs.