HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2507 OF 2011 14th September, 2011 Between Veggalam Srinivasa Rao, S/o Rambrahmam, Age: 50 years, Occ: Business, R/o Gandhi Chowk, Khamma, Khammam District. …. Petitioner And 1. Bommidi Srinivas, S/o Ramakrishna, age: 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o Gandhi Chowk, Khamma, Khammam District and 2 others …. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2507 OF 2011 ORDER: The third defendant in the suit is the petitioner herein. He calls in question the legality and validity of the orders passed by the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, in I.A.No.48 of 2011. 2. I.A.No.48 of 2011 was moved in O.S.No.148 of 2004, by the petitioner in the company of defendants 1 and 2 in the suit, seeking to mark two documents as exhibits on behalf of the defendants. The two documents that are sought to be marked are, one the field sketch demarcating the land in survey No.334 as 334/1 and 334/2. The second document sought to be marked is village account No.3, Adangal / Pahani for the year 2009-2010. The said document relates to land situated in Survey No.334. The petitioner has filed his written statement in the suit and specifically mentioned that they have purchased land situated in Survey No.334/AA (2), whereas the survey numbers mentioned in the two documents that are sought to be marked are different. They do not bear the survey No.334/AA (2). Therefore, the Court below has rightly refused to receive those two documents in evidence as exhibits. 2. I do not find any infirmity or illegality committed by the Court below, for me to exercise revisional jurisdiction. The revision is therefore dismissed. No costs. _____________________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao 14th September, 2011 SP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2507 OF 2011 14th September, 2011 SP