—\ 1N THE HIGH CwRT OF CHHATTiscARH AT BILASPUR WP. (S) 2m. PETITKWER : Jggdish prasad Shanna, aged about 74 years, Son of Late .Shri Thakur Prasad Shanna, Resident of Clo-PK. Shanna Chhota Bazar,Post— Chin‘miri, District- Ko’rea, (CG) V E R S U S ESPGNiiENTS: 1.7 $tate of Chhattisgarh, Through— Secretary, Hepartment of Tribal, Mantralaya, (Education) D:K.S. Bhawan; Raipur (CG) 2. /The Account General, Chhattisgrah, Raipur. 3. (The Joint Director, Lekha Kosh Avam Pension, Ambikapur,‘ no District— Surguja (CG). 4f Block Education officer, Khadgawan, District— Korea, CG. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT 1N THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI RX X X PROHIBETION AND FOR OTEER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS: R Wm.."Mg;Nm.2;7.2..é/Qi°200 amtm (Wu) WWW 3211mm WW wm $31‘mm WWaanaw 83: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mlghan shrivastag J. 17.6.2010 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, coun‘swl for the pen'tioner. Shn' Bhaskar Payasi, R‘pel Lawyer for the State] respondents No. 1, 3 8t, 4. ‘ Shri Anand Velma, Stan ng Counsel for respondent No.2. Heard. Learned counsel for th petitioner submits that the pe‘itioner retired on 31$ December, 199 mm the post of Head Master. Initially, the petitioner was paid Rs.46,725/- only. Though sevelal represen tions were made to the sheet that full payment of GPF has not been made, petitioner did not hear anything of communicau'on dated 11.4.2007 (Annexure P-4) shows that om e of Accountant General, Chhattisgarh has required Account omcer of the omce of Accountant General, Gwalior to send relevant reco s of the case of the petitioner. Leamed counsel for the pet'm'oner s s that so far, the gn'evanceof the petitioner regarding less payme t of GPF has not been redressed. Taking into consideratio the nature of controversy involved, it would be in the interest ofjus ' e to direct respondent No.2 to consider , the gievance of the petitioner with regard to alleged less payment of GPF. Respondents No.1, 3 &. 4 will provide full cooperation in the matter of hnal decision regarding payment of GPF‘. Taking into payment of G.P.F. was made hom respondents. A perus i d u 't mmm wmm mmm wwfs¢m *Wm is consideration that the petitioner retired long back, the entire exerce shall be completed with an o umr limit of 4 months Rom the date of receipt of copy of this order. {Counsel for respondent No.2 pmsent in the Court is directed to communicate the order of this Court to respondent No.2. With the aforesaid obse rvau’ons, the petition s dually disposed i 0E. 1'» Sd/- e4, Mamndra . Mohan ShrivastiaiviaAr \ m; M. E ‘w ‘ Judge mm E200 mm (WEI) :- 2*