AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1411 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.401 OF 2009 Sunil Kashinath Chandanshive ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. S.R. Chitnis, senior counsel i/b Mr. V.V. Purvant for the applicant. Ms. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : 23RD MARCH, 2010. P.C.:- 1. The applicant was charged for offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 307 read with Sections 149 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code; under Section 4 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act and under Section 37(1)(a) read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The appeal filed by the applicant has AJN 2 been admitted. This is his bail application. 2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out that the other accused have been released on bail. It is, however, not possible for us to release the applicant on bail because there is no parity between the present applicant and the other accused, who are released on bail. The applicant is apprehended from the place of incident with a chopper. FIR has been lodged immediately after the incident. PW-2 Vittal Hingne has clearly attributed a role to the applicant in the actual assault. Hence, no case is made out for bail. 4. The application is rejected. [MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.]