IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 558 of 2007. Nusrat Mohammad Ali Qureshi ..Applicant. Vs. Aadish Abdul Mulla & Ors ..Respondents. Mr G.H. Keluskar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr S. R. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent-State. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 23.06.2008. DATED : 23.06.2008. DATED : 23.06.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Perused the petition and the material available on record. 2. He submits that the entire submission revolves around the appreciation made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in his judgment and order dated 12.4.2006 in Session Case No. 492 of 2005. 3. Needless to mention that this Court not being a Court of appeal cannot reappreciate and substitute its view in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. Revisional jurisdiction is not only limited in scope but discretionary. The Court interferes in the revisional jurisdiction only in exceptional cases of flagrant miscarriage of justice as held by Apex Court in the case of State of Rajasthan v. Gurucharandas Chaddha, AIR State of Rajasthan v. Gurucharandas Chaddha, AIR State of Rajasthan v. Gurucharandas Chaddha, AIR 1979 SC 1895. 1979 SC 1895. 1979 SC 1895. No such case is made out by the applicant. 4. In the result, the revision application is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.)