WP(C) 4525/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Nr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner as wel l as Ms. D. Sinha, learned CGC. The petitioner is an aspirant for the post of Constable (GD), CR PF, but he has been found medically unfit on the ground of (i) Umbilical Hernia & (ii) Deformity of Nails. On a review medical examination on the basis of the a ppeal filed by the petitioner the finding of deformity was again confirmed. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it has been s tated that the deformity was so obvious that there was no doubt in diagnosis. It has also been stated that had there been any doubt, the Review Medical Board wo uld have consulted the specialist. It has also been stated that if the fitness c ertificate of the Medical Officer of Government Hospital is to be considered as final and exhaustive by the review medical board, then constitution of such medi cal board will be meaningless. What has emerged from the aforesaid stand is that in the review examination of the petitioner, there was no specialist doctor in respect of the area in which the deformity was detected. To quell any doubt regarding medical incapacity of the petitione r, it will be appropriate for the CRPF authority to constitute another Review Me dical Board in association with a specialist doctor, may be from CRPF itself to conduct medical test afresh in respect of the petitioner. Let the fresh exercise be carried out as expeditiously as possib le, preferably within 30.6.2011. Depending upon outcome of such review medical e xamination, the respondents may take further necessary follow up action. Whateve r may be the outcome of such review medical examination, the results thereof may be communicated to the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of.