^•Y° IN THE HIGHCOURTORJUDICATUREATBILASPUR fC.G.) '» WRTT PEmiON N0. 9'7 /2004 PETmONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. /^•' f ,k.-' •• *«^.~K •••' • ' :\ .•" ^sy- ^"<^-- 3. / ^•/.-" ^^..- y^/ ! ^:'^J> '-<y %^; 4. ^fi/ "F^dcsry p^^o^ 5. o^ °7, -As ^^V'N'V^4^T '^^'•sr-S-s," 6. COURT Smt. Ramlali Rathor W/o Dadua Rathor& D/o. Tejram'" Rathor aged aboutSOyearsR/o-VillageChorbhathi, Post- Gorsi, Tehsil- Jaitahari, District - Anooppyr(M.P.) Union of India ThoroughtheGeneral Manager S.E.C.Railway Zone Bilaspur (C.G.) The Divisonal Railway Manager S.E.C.Railway Bilaspur (C.G.) The Divisohal Personnel Qfficer S.E.g.filailyway Bilaspur(C.G.) TheP.W.I. S.E.C.Railway Pendra road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt.Budhani Bai, Wd/oTejram Rathor, aged about 60 years, R/o- Village - Patan, Post- Gorsi, Tehsil- Jiatahari, District- Anooppur (M.P.) Sitaram Rathor S/o Mahesh Rathor aged about 30 years, R/o- Village - Patan, Post- Gorsi, Tehsil- Jiatahari, District- Anooppur (M.P.) WRIT PETITIONUNDER M¥II@l.ES226/227 OR;THIE CONSTTTUTI^NiiaFlNi&IA. hepetitioherl3egst6submit|t5d:H" |ef-T- | t) PARTICULARSQE'THERBTEFIQNER: ! As shoiwn aboveintt'ffi'Eai.iseWe. ; PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As shown above in the cause title. BijiiitftifiBl ^^ XI-HC.22 SD^I^T ft-fi«hsn^y sh*iil:ft •yf^l psA-e-^^f '3^ rlllSli?J'i<)i':8al'a*iSt f°«awi< .sii^r '^K^•v^'^ ^ .;-,.; ^.^.^&.-.1Q-^.)^-OL< "WHWT^fliait 200 ft^a' sii^i l^nw^ilt!! 3-8-04 Shri F.S.KharS, Advocate forljhe petitioner Shri VinayHarit, Sr. Standinj Heard. Coimselforthe putitiouar petit^oner Leamed coimsel for the service benefits. 'He'&rther submits be given an opportunity 6f filing competent authority of the respond^nts ownmerits in accordance with law. subnuts that the mg.tter relates to |hat for the present the petitioner may pie detailed representatiQu befare the which shall be eonsidered on its ;d> Havingconsidered and witho^t offhe case, in ths opiriion of'tlus <3(|n direction is given felhe petitionM' to| his grievances.be{Qre|thecomp8teut a copy of the petition and this representation being filed, 'the comp^tent decide fhe same otr its owri meritsl possible prefeTably withm three m^nths representation.It is made clear thdt <(lll[cl<fl-t 111'li ^IB^ <Rl«SK . ^; sri:OT sn^i counsel for Union oflndia. expressing any opimon on the merits ;<|(urt, ends ofjustice will be served if a |maKe a detailfiilrepresentatipataising ^utfaonty ofthe respondents ak»gwife (trder, within; a monfh, and on sueh authority oftiie respc nr accordance witfa law as eariy as flCTH the date pf receipt ofthe if any grievance still remairis,the law. ip^tent petitioner may avail the remedy avail^ble underthe With fhe aforesaid observatipB|s, tius petitioh staads disposed of. ConsequentlyM.W.P.No. 17712/2004 and I.A. No. 4609/2004 also stands disposedof. sd/- Fakhruddin 'l^?' ^tfig* '!!i*>:l iir'F