THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 7th August 2009 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1472 and 1496 of 2009 1. C.R.P.No.1472 of 2009 Between: Edara Nageswara Rao, S/o.late Suryanarayana, Hindu, Agriculture, R/o.Venkatapalem Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. …PETITIONER AND 1. Alla Swarathi, W/o.late Seshaiah, 80 years, Hindu, House Wife, R/o.Venkatapalem Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. And six others. …RESPONDENTS 2. C.R.P.No.1496 of 2009 Between: Edara Nageswara Rao, S/o.late Suryanarayana, Hindu, Agriculture, R/o.Venkatapalem Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. …PETITIONER AND 1. Alla Swarathi, W/o.late Seshaiah, 80 years, Hindu, House Wife, R/o.Venkatapalem Village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. And six others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1472 and 1496 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: Heard both the sides. Since these two revisions are connected, they are taken up together for disposal. In these two revisions, petitioner-plaintiff seeks to assail the orders rejecting his request for issuing summons to the witnesses proposed to be examined. The case of the petitioner is that having regard to the fact that the proposed witnesses are not immediately traceable and their address is not available and hence, sought for some time. Having found that the application is filed at a belated stage where the evidence on defence side is also over, the Court below did not find favour with the request of the petitioner and rejected his request. However, liberty was given to examine the proposed witnesses without aid of the Court y issuing summons. In view of the said observation, absolutely there are no merits to interdict with the orders of the Court below. Both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 7th August 2009 RRB