1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9275 OF 2009 Shri.Vishwanath Shivram Pawar. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Maharashtra State Electricity Board and others. ...Respondents --- Mr.S.M.Sabrad, for Petitioner. Mrs.A.R.S.Baxi, for Respondent nos.1 to 3. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY,2010 P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondents states that the gratuity that was payable to the petitioner in accordance with law has already been paid to him and so far as the amount of provident fund is concerned, in case the petitioner appears before the respondent no.2 on 15.2.2010, his 2 cheque of provident fund will be handed over to him. The learned Counsel further states that interest as per law on the amount of provident fund will also be paid. The statements are accepted. In view these statements, the petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to adopt a remedy that may be available to him for recovery of interest,in case he is aggrieved. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (A.R.JOSHI, J.)