IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC NO.3431 OF 2008 ANJALY SHRIYA, WIFE OF ARBIND KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIKANDARPUR TOLA AT PRANPUR, POLICE STATION MOFASSIL, NAWADA, DISTRICT NAWADA ………………………………………………………PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA 5. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, NAWADA 6. THE CHAIRMAN, DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, NAWADA BLOCK 7. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME WELFARE OFFICER, NAWADA, DISTRICT NAWADA 8. SUNITA KUMARI, WIFE OF PERMENDRA KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIKANDARPUR TOLA PRANPUR, POLICE STATION MOFASSIL, NAWADA, DISTRICT NAWADA ……………………….……………………………………………………..RESPONDENTS ********* 3 13/04/2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by appointment of one Sunita Kumari to the post of Aanganbari Sevika on the ground that the certificates and the marks sheet produced by Sunita Kumari indicating that she had passed intermediate examination was forged and fake. The petitioner agitated her grievances and filed an application before the District Magistrate. Ultimately it would appear from Annexure 7 attached to Interlocutory Application No. 3168/2008 that the District Magistrate has directed that a fresh Aam Sabha should be held and appointment should be made to the post of Aanganbari Sevika. In view of the order of stay of this court no fresh appointment has taken place as yet. The District 2 Magistrate also came to the finding that the marks sheet produced by Sunita Kumari is forged. In view of the fact that the selection had taken place in the year 2007 and since then, no steps have been taken for holding the Aam Sabha, it would be proper that the Aam Sabha should be held and restricted to those candidates who were applicants in the year 2007. Sunita Kumari should also be allowed to apply for the said post along with the certificates showing that her mark sheets etc. are not forged. The appointment would only be finalized after the Child Development Project Officer/the District Magistrate is satisfied that the procedure had taken place in accordance with law and that the certificates produced by the candidates who have been chosen for the post is genuine, so that future complications and complaints should be minimized. The selection process should take place in accordance with the 2010 guidelines. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )