(1) RA. 60.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.60 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7200 OF 2008 Bansi Mukta Dhokare .. Applicant VERSUS Shaila Eknath Hande and ors. .. Respondents Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, Advocate h/f. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for the Applicant ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 9TH AUGUST, 2010 (IN CHAMBER : AT 4:30 PM.) ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned counsel. Review is sought on the ground that the First Appeal referred to in the judgment was on different grounds. It is argued that in the First Appeal no. 732 of 2002, main contention was regarding non-service of the summons. Considering the paragraph no.6 of the judgment in the said First Appeal, it is explicit that the main contention was to the effect that the said land was allotted to the share of the defendant no.1 i.e. (2) RA. 60.2010 petitioner-Bansi. That was the ground which was rejected by the first appellate Court. 2. It appears that again and again, the petitioner raised identical grounds and, therefore, the compensatory cost has been awarded. No substantial reason to review the judgment and order. Hence, Review Application is dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp