1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LPA NO. 251 OF 2009 IN W.P. NO. 2415 OF 2009 (Sanjay Laxmanrao Yeul vs. Awajisiddha Maharaj Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & F.M. REIS, JJ. JUNE 19, 2009. We have heard Shri Wathore, learned counsel for the appellant at length. There appears to be no reason to entertain the appeal against the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Admittedly earlier Writ Petition No. 1914 of 2008 was filed by the same petitioner and it was dismissed by this Court on 21.10.2008. In the next proceeding which was filed by the respondents, this Court in Writ Petition No. 704 of 2009 observed that the present petitioner is trying to delay the process of auctioning of the property without paying a single pie to the respondent society. The learned Single Judge has observed that after the upset price is re-fixed by the authority, the present petitioner again approached this Court challenging the recovery certificate. In spite of repeated queries, the learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to answer that when the same pleas were available in Writ Petition No. 1914 of 2008 why the present petition has been 2 filed. It may be noted that the earlier writ petition was dismissed because the mandatory requirements of Section 154(2A) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, were not complied with. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the said provision has not been complied with till today. In the circumstances, there is no merit in the present appeal and hence the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.