C ^{7ro ^- IN THE mOH COURT OF CmiATTISGARHATBILASPUR WMTPETITION fS) N0. fS^ /20Q€c^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER ..••-•^ h-y. <v Sl $PONDENTS y ^-' ^.^\ •^&^ ^ "• -^Svinash Chandra Xalco, aged about 49 years, son of Shri Jhumar Juis Xalco, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Higher Secondary School, Patratoli, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS L State of Chhattisgarh, through - S'ecretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2., Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. HMH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 117 of 2007 Petitioners : AAansingh Khonde and others Versus Respondents : Stute of Chhatt'is9arh and o-thers W. P.(S) No. 118 of 2007 Petitioners : Tejram Bhogo* ond o-thers Versus Respondents : State of Chh<rttiS9arh ond o'thers W. P.(S) No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanjcy Kumar Smha Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond onother W. P.fSVNo. 126 of 2007 Petitwner : Bhuvneshwar Prasad PratVwn Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond others W. P.fS) No. 127 of 20)7 Petitioner : Kulrunjan Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgtirh and o-thers W. P.(S) No. 128 of 2007 Petitioner ; Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents : Stete of Chhatt'isgarh ond onother W. P.(S\ No. 129 of 2007 Petitioner : Philos Akshoy Mukut Ti99a Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and onother W P.(S} No. 130 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Pnsadi Bhogat Versus Respondents : State of Chhorttisgarh and ano-ther W. P.fS) No. 131 of 2007 Petitioner : Sa9ar Sai Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers W. P.fS) No. 133 of 2007 Petitioner : Inus Bek Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh ond ono-ther W. P.(S) No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Baliram Nicgat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond onother W. P.(S) No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chondra Xalco Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9<irh and o-thers W. P.(S} No. 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashikata Bhcgat Versus Re^iondents ; State of Chhattisgarh ond cuwther W. P.(S} No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhfl»idyramBhagat Versus Respondents : Storte of ChhartiS9arh ond another W. P.(S) No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementaia Tigga Versus Respondents : 5tate of ChhaftiS9arh and another W. P.(S) No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Krishna Ram Patel Versus Respondents ; State of Chhffttisgarh and others W P.fS)No. 147 of 2007 Petitwner : Laxminanyan Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and oiw-ther W. P.fS) No. 149 of 2007 Petitwner : Smt. Atoxi Miliyoni Toppo Versus Reqwndents : State of Chhatt-isgarh ond onother W. P.fS) No. 150 of 2007 Petitkmer : Smt. Rajmoni Versus Respondents : S'tute of Oihatt-isgarh and others W. P.IS) No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Chamru Raun Nagdeo Versus Respondents : State of Chhatti^arh and o-thers W. P.(S) No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanesh Ram Pradhan Versus Respondents ; S-tate of Chhatt-is9arh ond another W. P.(S) No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotelal Khanna Versus Respwidents ; State of Chhatt-is9arh and another W. P.fS) No. 165 af 2007 Petitioner : Ramkumar Choudhari Versus Responden-ts : State of Oihattisgarh and another And W. P.fS) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijnwhan Noyak Versus Reqiondents : State of Chh<rttiS9arh and ano-ther SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. A^hutri, J Preaent: Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mrs. Any Ahuju, Oeputy Swemment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey,Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lowyer for •the respondents/State. ORDEft 0>assed on -this 17th Day of Jonucuy, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioners as well as for 'the State/respondents jointly submit -that the facts of the present writ petitions are simikir to -that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sudtil Tiwari and o'thers vs. State Sovemment of Chhatl-isgarh & o-thers), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit thot -the questkm of law involved is also the some. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions flnade by leamed counset for •the parties, these writ petitions are allowed m •terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 pussed by *is Court- in WP. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari ond others vs. State fiovemment of Chhattis9arh A o'thers). No order as to costs. SiAhosh 3. A copy of this order be ptoced on record in other comiected writ petition. -—— sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge