C^Uecro IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. IL&64 OF 2008 PETITIONERS ISKSW <?• <" ./^ ,y^ '.••'' .• ^..••t^"' ..••'" <.-;''^'" ..•-•'"" ^y^" .• c^^'y'' ^'"••, ..•«(i).y' ••"' .V9~r>7~ / 2-61% ^,c<-®^ 10 KBSPONDENTS 1. Rama Shankar Rai s/o Late Shri Bandhu Rai, aged about 54 years, Assistant Teacher, Public Higher Secondary School, Baghbahra, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 2. Tulsi Ram Dadsena s/o Hari Ram. Dadsena, aged about 58 years, Upper Division Teacher, PubUc Higher Secondary School, Baghbahra, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. Hargovuid Prasad Mishra, s/o Shri Chaturbhuj Mishra, aged about 60 years, Upper Division Teacher, Public Higher Secondary School, Baghbahra, Dista-ict Mahasamund (C.G.) 4. Munna Lal Sahu, s/o Shri Jait Ram Sahu, aged about 47 years, Upper Division Teacher, I^-iblic Higher Secondary School, Baghbahra, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ^VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.). 3. District Education Officer, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICT-E 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^^3 '.^ -.'^"'•^ u :J'l ^sS/ /y ^y^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: olLASPUR yjnQle Dencn: HOn'oie ynri rflaninara. monan onr!yasiava, WRiT PETiTION i3j N0, 'e'c. i i i iuNfcKS KcarUivUfcn Karna onar'Kar K'ai &. >i omers versus State of ChhattiSuai'h & 2 others :S"^LiC'<^Sf '^iali i r^HUpwHi UUDQy, COUalSSl TOE U)0 pSuIIOIiSiS. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy' Auv'ocate GeneraE aiof Satlsh GuDta. Govt. Advocate for the State. iy wiln i>nri ^"%^S A S ^*tii3w£S^^"^2 v-fru"4E- WrS.L/£iF\ ^^S-h i...... . ^^ li's'" ijune, ^u neara. 'i. Lssmsci counset appeanny Tor ine peiiiiorier suDfn'is insi ine pouiiorsei's wno 'w'ere M.ssisiani ieacners, passeu oii examinaijon ai inerr own COSES anu expense uetore entry inio service a'nu tnereTore tney are entitieo iu grant OT z auvance incremenis on me D-asis OT cireuiar u'aiea <;i/uyi'T»/4 issuea DY ine State Goverriment. it is s'ubmltteu that the conuoversy invoived Iri the present petitlon Is cover^u by the judgrnent of SuprerTie Couu In tti^ case QE Ashs Saxena v. State of M.P. S others, 2009 itl iviPJR (Supi'erne Court) page 5S anu oro'er uateu 4/3UU1 u passea in v'v'nt Appeai No.o/i'ua anu aiso orusr uaieu 28/04/2010 passeu in WritADDeai No.124/09. It is submitteu that iri fne aforesaid decision. it has been heid that those 'vvho have obtained B.EurBT! deHi'ee at theii' ovr'n expense oeiore eniry inio serv'ice; ine'y are enijiieu 10 'wo aavance incremenis. i. Learnea counsei TOF ine responaenis suorrijis inai ine case or ine 'peuiioner 'wiii ue consiuerea m accoruance Vt'iin ine aToresaiu oruers anu AS^- ne.csssary oroers vvouiu De passea arter uue venncation OT ine Facts pieaueu in ine peiiuon on sausracBun mai ine peiiiion is covereu DV ine aroresa'u QeciSiun. ^?. EH view OT ine guove SLaieiTierEis. IHIS peiiu'on is Tiriaiiy Cjisposeo O?T vVi'?n iny -E-^A.-..^ ----;.!--.!.L- --^- -^^-. ..-^L:^-^-S- ^:-:.-. ^.- -_„--. _^ uirecHon 10 responaents 10 consia'er ine case 01 tne Detftioner's ciaiiTi ror grant OT tw'o aQ'vance inGferfE^nts In tn@ lipht of luyprrisnt of th@ Supremo Couil En ths case Msna oaxena v. s^iaie OT E'yi.r'. & onisi's, ^uui? m i'vir'jr; (oUDfeFTis L'ourt) page 5S and order ds.ted 4/3/2010 passed iri VVrit Appeal No.87/09 anu also order dated 29/04/2010 passeu in Writ Appeal No.124/0s. in case, it is faunc' tnai me cases or ine peutioners are iQeniicai, ine Deneiii OT iwo aavance incremenis snaii 'oe exTenueu 10 irie ueu'Eioners. asS'^SS'* vviin ine aToresaiu ODseryaiions, ine peuiion ig Tinsiry uisposeu 017. Sd/- f Manindra Mohan Shrivastava| Judge ? FT^S^