;i:l HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS - WKTT PETITION No. 651 of 2004 Naryodhan Singh, S/o Shri Ramprasad, aged about 48 years, Agriculturist, R/'o village - Sarbahara, Tahsil - Pendraroad, Distriet Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Tfarough: The Secretary, Cooperative Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryailit, Head Office, Bilaspur (C.G.), Through: The ChiefExecutiveOfBcer. 3. The Branch Manager, Zila Sahakari Kendriya Baak Maryadit, Braueh Office Pend-aroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.) i 4. The Additional Supenintendent of Police, Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Shri N.H.Kanwar, Additional Supemitendent ofPolice, Pendraroad, DistrictBilaspur(G.©.) WMT PETmONUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Sattsh K. Asmhotri.^, Present: ShriRakesh Pandey, Advocate forfhe petitianer. Sfari SatishGupta, Govemment Advocate forflie State/ Respondent No. 1 and 4. ORALORDER (Passed on 06tB day of February, 2008) 1. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the non-allotment of loan by the respondent-Bank, has filedthis petition seekirig a writ/du-sction to the respondent No. 3 to advance Ifae remaining amount of loan to the pefitioneT, whidi was sanotioned for the purposes of excavatien and constructionofwell andpurehase ofdiesel pump. 2. On query, leamedcounsel elearly admits that th®ioan was sanFtioned fbrthe purposes ofexcavation and constructiotiofweUandlpurdhaseof iSnnt JU^ 't-l' !TH diesel pump at village Sadhwani on the land bearing Khasra No. 1/40 admeasuring about 1.90 acres. Oa enquiry by the Bank, it was found fhat the petitioner, after havinj obtained Ihe amount in two instalhnents, started excavation and constFuetiou of well at villaee Sarbahara? at some different land. The respondent-Bank, after having come to know aboutthe illegal use ofthe loan amount by fhe petitioner for the purposes of excavation and construction of well in some other area and not on fhe allotted area, declmedto release the remaining amount ofloan. The petitioner is unable topoint out how non-release ofbalanee amount is illegal when the petitioner himself is excavating and constructing well on the place for which fhe amount of loan was not sanctiened. The petition is devoid ofment and there is no statutory or legal right alleged to have beeh infiinged by the action offtie respondent-Bank. Thus, thispetitionis dismissed, summarily. No order astocosts. | Sd/- 1satish K. Agnihotri Judge