^30c THB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB ATmLASFUR W.P N0. /36 0^/2003 PEiniOMERS ->^?* Ss-'^' < •""."°,wv!C^"" ^^^2, ..»'s>^.~;;-~ \^^rP VER8US RESPOBDENTS ftCtW^ CW'1 3. ^. OM PRAKASH AGED 30 YEARS, SOW OF 8HRI ISWAR[ PRASAD RATHORE, R/0. GRAM NANDAUI? KHURD, TEHSIL SAKTI, DISTT. JANJGIR, CHAMPA(CG) BANWARILAL AOED 26 YEARS SON OP LATE G.P. DEWANGAN, R/0. ADBHAR, TEHSIL MALKHARAUDA, DISTT. JANJGIR CHAMPA (CG) DHARMENDRA ^PHAUHA AGED 25 '"YEARS, SOW OF LATE BHARATLAL CHAUHAN, R.O. SENDRI, THANA BARADUAR, DISTT. JANJGIR CHA.MPA (CG) OF -. THE STATE CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SEGRETARY GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, DKS BHAWANRAIPUR 2. COLLECTOR DISTRICT JANJGIR CHAMPA 3. 8TATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMIWISTRATION j ,, , DEPARTMENT, VAIAABH BHAWAN, BHOEAL (MP) <; UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL ~ AND TRAINING, (STATE REORGANI8ATION CELL), NEW DELHI. WRIT PETITION LNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF TIIE CDNSTITUTION OF INDIA v @ HIGH COURT Of JUDICATURB CHBEIATITOGARH : BIIASPUR SINGLEBEiNCH : HON'BLESHRISATISHK.AGNIHOTRI.J. WRIT PETITION N0.3602 OF2(»3 Petitioners Respondents versus Om Prakash aad otfaers The State of Chhattisgarh aiid othera Present ': Mr. Sanjay KTUnar Agrawal, couxisel for fhe petitioners. Mr. V.V.S.MurtIiy, Depu<y Advoeate Oeneral with Mr. Maa^li Upadhyay, Panel Lawyer for respondents No.l and2. Mr. S.K.Beriwal, Standing Couusel for respondent No.4/Uiuon oflndia. None for respondent No.3. ORAL 0&DBR .„! > JI!S;!JU (20aAprU,r2006) Leamed coTinsel for' the petitioners submits fhat the fafher ofpetitioner No.l, namcly, Shri Iswari Prasad Rathore died on 27-7-2000 in hamcss while working as Asstetant Grade-III in Jaapad Paachayat, Malkhaiauda ffiajasva-Sfhapna). The father ofpetitioner No.2, namely, Shn G.P.Dewaxigau died ou 8-5-2000 in hamesswlule workiag as Asstetaat Officer of Soil Conservation in Asstetant Soil Conservation Departincnt aad fhe father of petituiner No.3, n.amely, Shri Bharatlal Chauhan died on 31-10-2000 in hamess while workiag as Forest Guard iu Forest Departinent of fhe Gtovenunent. Leamed coiiasel for fhe petitioneis further submits fhat thc petitioners, beiag dependcnt-legal Iicirs, appUed | imaiediately Gppal -'i- thereafter for coinpassionate appointment, but tiU date, fheir cases for comp^sionate appoiatment have not been decidcd. 2. The Goveminent of ChtiattisgarU, by its circular dated 2- 2-2006, has directed all flie departments to consider c^es ofaU fhe eligible dependaat-legal heir offhe eniployees, who died iu hamess betweeu 1-11-1997 to 31-10-2000 for com.passionateappointment 3. Accordiagly, fhe Oovcnuaent of Chliattisgarh is directed to consider fhe cases of the petitioners as per its own circular dated 2-2-2006 aod also in view of fhe order dated 20-12-2005 passed by fhis Court in Writ PetitionNo. 1322/2002 and ofher coimected matters, on fheir own merit, in accoidaace wifh law, on such representations bciag filed by fhe petitioners. 4. For fhe reasons stated ^bove, fhe writ petttion staads disposcd of. No order as to costs. Certt&ed copy as per rules. Sd/- SatishK.Affiu F Judge