4 HIGH COURT OF JUDSCATURE CHHATT3SGARH : BSLASPUR SJngSe Bench : Hon'bte Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ. Wrjt Petition No.5917 OF 2005 PETITIONERS 1. 2. 3. 4. ^ 6. Geetanjati Sahu, D/o Shri L.R. Sahu, Aged about 21 years, S^veta Bhakru; D/o Shri Arjun Bhakru, aged about 22 years Vandna Dewangan, D/o Shri Jayant Kumar Dewangan, aged about 23 years Priya Sahu, D/o Shri N.K. Sahu, aged about 20 years Rachna Daddha, D/o Shri Vijay Daddha, aged about 20 years Vibha Arjaria, D/o Shri D. Arjaria, Aged about 20 years Ail are students of Second Year (4th Semester), M.B.B.S. Course; Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) versus RESPONDENTS 3. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Heatth, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhav^an, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh tnstitute of Medicat Scjence through : Dean, Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science, Bilaspur, Distt. Bitaspur (C.G.) Guru Ghasidas University through Registrar, Guru Ghasidas University, Koni, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Writ Petstion No.317 OF 200S PETITIONER Madhukar Baghe!, aged about 23 years, son of Shri Fekuram Baghel, resident of viilage Chataud, Post Dhondhetata, District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 2. 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department ofHealth and Famity Welfare (Jncluding Medical Education) D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G) Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur, through the Chancellor / The Governor Chhattisgarh, Raj Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -^as^^-^^.—.~. -2.- 41 4. The Director Medicai Education State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C.G.) 5, The Medical Council of India, Evan a Ga.lib Marg, New Delhi through its Registrar / Authorised Signato^, New Deihi. Present : Mr.V.R. Tiwari, iearned counsei forthe petitioners (W.P. No. 5917 of 2005). Mr. S.K. Chandel, learned counsel forthe petitioner (W.P. No.317of2006) Mr.Yash'want Slngh, iearned Governrnent Advocate for respondent State of Chhattisgarh. Mr.Manindra Shrivastava, learned.Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amrito Das; iearned counset for CiMS and University. Miss Samta Jain, iearned counsel for MCI. ORAL GRDER (Passecton 28th February, 200S) Since the points invoived in these writ pet.itions are substantially sjmilar, they wsre ciubbed, heard them together and they are being disposed of b-y this oommon order (2) The points that arise for decision-making in these writ petitions, it is stated at the Bar, are seized by the Apex Court in Writ Petition No. 6314 of 2005 and connected wrtt petitions flted under Articie 32 of the Constitution. tn that view of the matter 1 dispose of att these writ petitions, teaving open all the contentions raised by the parties in these writ petitions in their respective pieadings. No costs. (3) Having considered the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners for extension of stay as wef! as the opposition raised by the University, i think it just and reasonable to continue the stay for a further period of one month from today. Accordingiy, i direct that interim order, wherever granted in this bateh of writ petitions, shatl be in operation for a further perioct of one month only from today. Chief Justice ^^