1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 9748 of 2011-E, 9749 of 2011-E, 9750 of 2011-E, 9751 of 2011-F & 9752 of 2011-F . Decided on: 16.11.2011 1. CWP No. 9748 of 2011-E Sohan Lal Vs. State of H.P. & others 2. CWP No. 9749 of 2011-E Prem Sukh Vs. State of H.P. & others 3. CWP No. 9750 of 2011-E, Lal Man Vs. State of H.P. & others 4. CWP No. 9751 of 2011-F, Bhagat Ram Vs. State of H.P. & others 5. CWP No. 9752 of 2011-F, Ram Singh Vs. State of H.P. & others Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Ms. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State H.P, decided on 15.7.2010 and CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & another and other connected matters, decided on 16.12.2010. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 3. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgments, referred to above, and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith the representation(s) and copy of the writ petition(s) as 3 well as copies of the judgments, referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. 4. With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 16, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.