1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.202 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2144 OF 1996 Kashinath Shriram Rajput, R/o-Vidyanagari, Taloda, Dist-Nandurbar. ...APPELLANT. VERSUS Krishi Utpanna Bazar Samiti, Taloda (Through its Secretary), Taluka-Taloda, Dist-Nandurbar. ...RESPONDENT. ... Shri.A.G. Magare Advocate for Appellant. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2 2. The learned counsel submits that the Appellant had sufficient evidence in support of his claim that he has actually worked from 1st January, 1970 to 31st August, 1977 and therefore he is entitled for overtime wages. 3. We have perused the Judgment and Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.2144 of 1996. On merits this issue was considered by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge in Para 6 of the Judgment, observed that, after going through the Judgment and order passed by the Labour Court, it is apparent that there is no finding recorded as to whether the Petitioner/Appellant has actually worked for the period from 1st January, 1970 to 31st August, 1977. 4. After hearing the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the Appellant and after perusing the relevant documents on record, we do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the 3 learned Single Judge. The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/SEPT10/lpa202.10