THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.506 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner has questioned the action of respondents 1 to 4 in interfering with his life and liberty. It is the case of the petitioner that there are disputes with regard to monetary transactions between him and the fifth respondent. It is stated that the fifth respondent obtained loan with regard to business transactions and in that regard, he issued a cheque in favour of the petitioner on 04.01.2011 but when the same was presented, it was dishonoured on 06.01.2011. It is the grievance of the petitioner that at the instance of the fifth respondent, the fourth respondent is interfering with his life and liberty by calling him to the Police Station frequently and directing him to settle the dispute with the fifth respondent. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that no cases are registered against the petitioner and the allegation of the petitioner that respondents 3 and 4 have asked him to settle the matter with the fifth respondent is incorrect and baseless. It is further submitted that the respondents - police did not interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members at any point of time, and his presence is also not required, as no crime is registered against him. Although it is the case of the petitioner that there is interference by respondents 1 to 4, based on the written instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home stated that there is no interference by the respondents – police and as no crime is registered against the petitioner, his presence is also not required. In the absence of any material in support of the case of the petitioner and in view of the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4 that there is no interference by the respondents - police with the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as in the disputes existing between the petitioner and fifth respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. However, I make it clear that any such further complaint will be viewed seriously. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 28th JANUARY, 2011. kvni