1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 2550 of 2011 1. S.Kalidoss 2. S.Veeramakali 3. S.Sathya 4. S.Maridoss 5. S.Ramadoss 6. G.Muthu ... Petitioners Vs 1. The State rep. by the Inspector of Police All Women Police Station(Town) Madurai(Crime No.31 of 2009) 2. G.Sumathi ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No. 175 of 2010 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai and quash the same. *** For Petitioners : Mr. S.Thirupathy For 1st Respondent : Mr.L.Murugan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For 2nd Respondent: Mr.J.Karthick O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking for the relief of quashing the proceedings pending against them in C.C.No. 175 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter was amicably settled between the parties viz., petitioners and the second respondent/ de facto complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the parties viz., the petitioners and the second respondent/de-facto complainant signed and filed the Joint Compromise Memo before this Court on 01.03.2011. Therefore, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the proceedings pending in C.C.No.175 of 2010 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, is liable to be quashed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. The learned counsel appearing for the de-facto complainant submitted that the matter was amicably settled between the parties viz., the petitioners/Accused and the de- facto complainant and both the parties signed and filed the Joint Compromise Memo before this Court. 4. Heard Mr.S.Thirupathy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the first respondent and also Mr.J.Karthick, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. I have also perused the materials available on record including the Joint Compromise Memo signed and filed by both the parties. 5. It is seen that as per the submissions of both the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the de-facto complainant, the matter was amicably settled between the parties in this case. It is also seen that both the parties viz., the petitioners and the de-facto complainant also filed a Joint Compromise Memo, dated 01.03.2011 before this Court. 6. Both the parties viz., the Petitioners and the de- facto complainant also appeared in person before this Court and stated that the matter was amicably settled between them. It is seen from the affidavit as well as the statement made by parties before this Court that the de-facto complainant is not interested in pursuing the matter further. 7. In view of the sequence of events and in view of the compromise reached in between both the parties, on 01.03.201, there is no reason to proceed with the case in C.C.No. 175 of 2010. Hence, the Proceedings initiated against the petitioners C.C.No. 175 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai is hereby quashed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai 2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai 3.The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station(Town), Madurai 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai +One Cc to Mr.S.Thirupathy, Advocate, SR.No.10523 vsg rl/6c – 5.4.2011 Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 2550 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/