D.B. CIVIL HABEAS CORPUS PETITION No. 5113/2008 (Kailash Vs. State & Ors.) Date : 29.7.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. HON'BLE MR. CHAND MAL TOTLA, J. Mr. Teja Ram Choudhary for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. As per facts stated in the petition, the petitioner and corpus are not married and they only have interest in marrying each other. According to the petitioner, he prepared the papers, affidavits and application for contracting marriage with the corpus through Arya Samaj, however, the petitioner could not successfully contract marriage as according to the petitioner, parents of the corpus are not allowing corpus to contract marriage with the petitioner. Therefore, according to petitioner, corpus is in illegal detention. It is further submitted that corpus is major and take her own decision. We do not find any material or even pleading sufficient to draw inference that corpus is in illegal detention. Habeas Corpus petitions are not meant for bringing the corpus so as to fulfill the wish of the petitioner. In view of above, we do not find any merit in the Habeas Corpus petition and the same is dismissed. (CHAND MAL TOTLA), J. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. bjsh