THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.M.P.Nos.14165 & 14166 of 2011 and CRIMINAL PETITION No.12513 of 2011 ORDER: Petitioners/A-1 & A-2 approached this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.632 of 2010 on the ﬁle of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Heard. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the de facto complainant and the petitioners are present. The de facto complainant ﬁled a copy of her PAN card, whereas the petitioners ﬁled their respective oﬃce identity card and votor identity card, in proof of their identity. A compromise petition, duly signed by both parties, is also ﬁled before this Court praying the Court to permit both parties to compromise the matter. Along with this compromise petition, memo of compromise, duly signed by both parties, is ﬁled narrating the mode of compromise. Further, another miscellaneous petition seeking permission of the court to compound the oﬀence is also ﬁled before this Court. The de facto complainant ﬁled her aﬃdavit along with the petition ﬁled for compounding the oﬀence. In the said aﬃdavit, it is stated that since the elders and well wishers intervened and settled the disputes between the 1st petitioner and the de facto complainant, the de facto complainant agreed for the settlement. When questioned, the complainant stated that she had no objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners. In view of the settlement arrived at between both parties, this Court is of the view that by invoking the provisions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the proceedings against the petitioners can be quashed. Accordingly, the miscellaneous petitions, ﬁled for compromise and compounding the oﬀence, and the criminal petition are allowed quashing the proceedings against the petitioners/A-1 & A-2 in C.C.No.632 of 2010 on the ﬁle of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. ______________ RAJA ELANGO, J. 25.11.2011 v v