IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38895 of 2010 1. Prameshwar Yadav 2. Sonama Devi --------------------- Petitioners Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 4 27.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation that needs no corroboration for petitioner no.1-husband as on his initiation notice was issued to the complainant-wife. The case was sent to Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Complainant-wife appeared for five dates but petitioner no.1 did not appear for a single day that further goes to show that differences are there in between the wife and husband only. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.1 is rejected. For petitioner no.2 who is mother-in- law, prayer for anticipatory bail on her behalf is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya in Complaint Case No. 118 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)