IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 35463 of 2004(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- C.P.AJAYGOSH, PROPRIETOR, C.K.P.GRANITES, MAMALA P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRIPUNITHURA. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PUTHENCRUZ. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB FOR R1 TO R4 SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB FOR R1 TO R4 SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B SRI. SANTHALINGAM, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ds WP(C).No. 35463 of 2004(V) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2003 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2003 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 26.08.03. P4: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 03.03.2004 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C.No.9512 OF 2004. P6: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2004 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P7: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.09.2004 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. P8: COPY OF THE BILL DATED 15.10.2004 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P9: COPY OF THE BILL DATED 15.11.2004 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P10: COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN THE YEAR 2004. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE B.P.RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - W.P.C. NO. 35463 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the Board. 2. The grievances of the petitioner is that the petitioner's premise which is registered as a Small Scale Industry was entitled to be given electric connection under LT IV(A) category with effect from 16.06.1999, the date on which he was given connection. Ext. P2 order issued by the 4th respondent would establish that the petitioner was entitled to get electric connection under LT IV category. Said order was issued only with effect from March 2003. Hence the petitioner submitted Ext. P3 appeal requesting the 2nd respondent to give the benefit of Ext. P2 order with effect from 16.06.1999. W.P.C.No.35463/2004 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that on the request of the petitioner, he was given commercial connection and therefore, the petitioner cannot say that the order is bad. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and accordingly dismissed. B.P. RAY, JUDGE. ds