* 1 * Appln. 1964.2009.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1964 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2009 Sitaram S. Shetty ..... Applicant vs. Bhasker Hande & Anr. ..... Respondent Mr. KishorH. Hase for V.S.Kokitkar, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Amol B. Patl for respondent No.1. Mr. P.A. Pol, APP for State/respondent No.2. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 24TH AUGUST, 2009. PC : 1 This application is filed for condonation of delay of 94 days in filing application for leave to file appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th September, 2008 passed by the learned Magistrate. The said Judgment and order is of acquittal of the respondent under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. 2 The reason as made in the application for condonation of delay reads as follows: “The Applicant states that, the Applicant was out of station for some * 2 * Appln. 1964.2009.sxw period. Thereafter, taking advised and collecting papers and making financial arrangement appellant has filed this appeal as early as possible.” 3 The above grounds sought to be made out are absolutely vague and without necessary particulars. The applicant has not stated during which period he was out of station. He does not specify collection of papers to be done, was from whom and from where and how much time was taken for the same. He also does not specify from whom and how he was required to take advise which added to the delay. Thus, there is no case was made out for condonation of delay. Hence, the application is rejected. 4 In view of the rejection of the application for condonation of delay the Criminal Application for leave to file Appeal and the Criminal Appeal filed also stands rejected. [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.]