:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3693 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3693 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3693 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 431 OF 2003. CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 431 OF 2003. CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 431 OF 2003. AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3694 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3694 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3694 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 433 OF 2003. CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 433 OF 2003. CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO. 433 OF 2003. -------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.M. Joshi for the applicant. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : 09.09.2004 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the parties. In substance, attempt in this application is for review of order dated November, 11, 2003. It is well settled that criminal Court has no power to review its own order except for the limited purpose of correcting :2: clerical mistakes. Viewed in the perspective the present application is misconceived. Counsel appearing for the applicant, however, submits that the parties have arrived at amicable settlement and for which reason this Court should entertain the present application and compound the offence on the assumption that the prosecution is still pending as the applicant is presently under going the sentence awarded by the court below as confirmed by this Court. It is not possible to accept this submission. The remedy of the applicant may be elsewhere but it is not open for this Court to recall the case which is already decided on merits. Hence both these applications fail and are dismissed.