IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 58 OF 2010 SHRI. FATEHSING HINDURAO PATIL ... Petitioner Versus SMT. RUPALI FATEHSING PATIL @ RUPALI MANIKRAO DESAI, ... Respondent Mr. Abhay Nachanolkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 15th June, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr.Abhay Nachanolkar,learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Shivan Dessai, learned Advocate for the respondent. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 7.5.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ponda in maintenance application no.7/2009 granting interim relief under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code. 3. Mr. Dessai,learned Advocate for the respondent placing reliance upon the order dated 19.7.2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.58/2009 submitted that in view of the said order which has been passed in reference, the remedy of revision is available to the petitioner and the Writ petition filed at the instance of the petitioner is not maintainable. 4. Mr.Nachanolkar, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment in the case of Joaquim D'Souza Vs. Mrs. Milinda Rosy D'Souza and others in Criminal Writ Petition No.58/2009 relied upon by Mr. Dessai,the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file revision application against impugned order. 5. Since impugned order is revisable, liberty is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Needless to mention that petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy that may be available in law. 6. Writ Petition stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn