IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23760 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.P.ABDULKHADER, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.MAMMAD, THASHREEFA MANZIL, CHENGALAYI, CHENGALAYI VILLAGE, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD SRI.SAJU J PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. THE KANNUR MEDICAL COLLEGE, ANJARAKANDI, MAMBA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 611. SR GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23760 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ALLOTMENT MEMO ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE INCOME CERTIFICATE DATED 10.11.10 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHENGALAYI EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE PROFORMA REPORT DATED 12.1.2011 MADE BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 27.7.2011 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28.7.11 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KANNUR, TO THE COMMISSIONER OF ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS EXT.P7- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J .............................................. W.P.(C).23760/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner was a Village man in the Revenue Department. He retired from service in the year 2009 and according to him, his annual income is Rs.51,535/-. It is submitted that the daughter of the petitioner, Thashreefa K.V, was selected for admission to MBBS Course and was allotted to the fifth respondent College. It is the case of the petitioner that the benefit of fee concession has been denied to his daughter. However, Tahsildar submitted Ext.P5 to the District Collector confirming that the petitioner is eligible for fee concession and according to him, the District Collector has submitted Ext.P6 report to the second respondent. In the said circumstances, petitioner has also submitted Ext.P7 representation to the second respondent. In spite of having done all these, orders have not been passed thereon as a result of which the benefit of fee concession has been denied to the petitioner's daughter. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. From the facts as noticed above, it is evident that Ext.P7 representation and also Ext.P6 report of the District Collector are W.P.(C).23760/11 2 pending consideration of the second respondent. In that view of the matter, I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P7 in the light of Exts.P5 and P6 referred to above, and orders thereon shall be passed, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs