C-482 No. 21 of 2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.06.2006 passed by the learned Session Judge, Haridwar in Criminal Revision No. 157 of 2006, Ashwani Kumar Vs State. Brief facts giving rise to this petition are that the proceedings under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. was initiated before the S.D.M., Roorkee. The S.D.M., Roorkee passed the order dated 06.02.2006 directing therein the illegal construction should be removed. Against the aforesaid order, a revision was preferred by the respondents No. 4 and the revisional court observed in the judgment that the order passed by the S.D.M., Roorkee was without issuing any notice to the revisionist. The revisional court has also observed, the procedure envisaged under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. has not been followed by the S.D.M., Roorkee. Therefore, the order passed by the S.D.M. is bad in the eye of law. Heard Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned order passed by the revisional court. The revisional court is perfectly justified to remand the matter to the court of S.D.M. for deciding the matter afresh. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is dismissed in-limine. However, I direct the S.D.M., Roorkee where the dispute is pending to dispose of the matter under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. expeditiously without causing any unreasonable delay as well as in accordance with law. (B.C.K., J.) 09.01.2008 ASWAL