IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No. 3894 of 2009. Decided on: 23.2.2010. Surinder Singh. …Petitioner. versus State of H.P. & another …Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The petitioner has filed the Writ Petition with the following prayer: “ a) Because such an act of omission and commission on the part of the respondents whereby they have no regularized the petitioner from due date, i.e., 17.09.2006 and has also not counted the entire period of petitioner rendered on contract basis for the purposes of increments and seniority etc., is illegal, arbitrary, malafide, discriminatory and against the well-established principles of natural justice as well as violative of the mandatory provisions of the Constitution of India.” Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- It is seen that the petitioner has already made a representation vide Annexure P-7, before the second respondent. Accordingly, we direct the second respondent to look into Annexure P-7 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months on the production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the Writ Petition and Annexures. In case the petitioner was not granted opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. With these observations, the petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice. ( R.B. Misra ), February 23, 2010 Judge. ( tr/ks)