IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.310 of 2004 RAME MURMU Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 29.7.2008. L.P.A.No.100 of 1995 was dismissed by order dated 17.12.2002. For its restoration, petitioner filed M.J.C.No.310 of 2004. On 9.2.2005, when the matter was taken up, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner but the Court showing indulgence, granted the petitioner time till 14th of February, 2005 to remove the defects. Peremptory time granted by order dated 9.2.2005 was not carried out and accordingly, M.J.C.No.310 of 2004 was dismissed. Thereafter, petitioner filed M.J.C.No.2132 of 2005 for restoration of M.J.C.no.310 of 2004. By order dated 6.12.2007, said application was allowed and M.J.C.No.310 of 2004 was directed to be restored subject to the petitioner complying the order dated 9.2.2005, if already not complied, by 7.12.2007. The petitioner did not comply even that order and in that view 2 of the matter, order dated 6.12.2007 restoring M.J.C.No.310 of 2004 had lost it efficacy. We are of the opinion that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the application. Application stands dismissed accordingly. (C.K.Prasad) (Dr.Ravi Ranjan) ahk