IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2008 / 1ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22178 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ CIJU SARA ABRAHAM, D/O. P.V. ABRAHAM, PLATHANATH HOUSE, KANNAMTHANAM P.O., MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM SAMSON RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 22178 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 23rd July, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner appeared for the B.Com. Degree examination in March/April, 2008, the result of which was declared on 18-6-2008. Dissatisfied with the result in one paper, namely, paper XII-Capital Market and Financial Services, the petitioner is stated to have filed an application for revaluation of the answer paper. The petitioner seeks expeditious completion of the revaluation process. 2. I have heard the standing counsel for the University who points out that the petitioner has neither produced the application nor the chalan receipt. Counsel for the petitioner would point out that the petitioner has quoted the chalan receipt number in the writ petition. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluation process, if the petitioner has applied for the same, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application has been received and is in order in all respects. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.