@#@#@#@#@#@#@ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO:1149 of 2006 DATED: 20-11-2006 Between: Smt.G.Nirmala ..... APPELLANT AND 1. The government OF Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad and 4 others. .....RESPONDENTS @#@#@#@#@#@#@ JUDGMENT:(per The Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) Aggrieved by the interlocutory order, passed in W.V.M.P.No.3477 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.31225 in W.P.No.24301 of 2005 dated 09-10-2006, the present appeal is preferred, by the petitioner in the writ petition. The learned Single Judge, by his order dated 09-10-2006, modified the earlier interim order dated 15-11- 2005 leaving it open to the respondents to take further steps for appointment by considering candidates who are eligible as per the notified vacancies. Heard Sri V.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant. Since the appeal is preferred against an interlocutory order, we do not consider it appropriate to adjudicate the appeal on merits, more so, when the writ petition is yet to be finally heard. Since all contentions now raised before us can be raised during the final hearing of the writ petition itself no prejudice can be said to have been caused to the petitioner-appellant necessitating the writ appeal being heard on merits. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. It is, however, made clear that any promotions made shall be subject to the result of the writ petition. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J _______________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 20th November, 2006 SKM