IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21920 of 2009 VIJAY RAM @ BIJAY RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.08.2009 This is the second anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner. Earlier by order dated 12.09.2006 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35702/06, prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected. Counsel for the petitioner submits that charge sheet has been submitted. Thereafter, investigation was completed and Final Form was submitted in case of the petitioner. However, cognizance has been taken against the petitioner by the Magistrate. Considering the fact that merit of the case was earlier considered by this court and cognizance is also there, I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, it is rejected. However, in case, the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the court below will consider subsequent developments which took place after rejection of the petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail. akv (Mridula Mishra, J.)