..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2008 Pappu @ Sandeep Kantilal Sanghvi. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Ms.Revati Mohite - Dere, Adv. for applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig.accused is seeking discharge in Sessions Case No.543 of 2005 which relates to C.R.No.233 of 2005 of Wanwadi police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The applicant has not been named in the FIR. No eye witness implicate the applicant. There is no recovery at the instance of the applicant. The learned APP states that the only material against the applicant is statement of coaccused. ..(2).. 4. In the present case the investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has been filed. No material has been pointed out by the learned APP except the statement of the coaccused. As the case is under IPC and the investigation is over, the said material cannot be taken into consideration. Hence, I am of the opinion that there is no legally admissible material against the applicant. Hence, I am inclined to discharge the applicant from C.R. No.233 of 2005 of Wanwadi police station, Pune. 5. The applicant - Pappu @ Sandeep Kantilal Sanghvi is discharged from C.R. No.233 of 2005 of Wanwadi police station, Pune. 6. Criminal Revision Application is allowed in above terms. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)