HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4054 of2008 PETmONER : Ku. Ashalata Gupta IXo Shri Madan Lal Gupta, aged abovt 43 years, working as Assistatit Eng?aeer^'PuNic Health Engineering, PrqJec* Divisioii No. II, 8ul> Divisi<mNo. III, District Raipur (QMhatt&gaift) VER8US ...... , . .. ..,,,. -. RESPONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through ^cretary, Departmeot of PubUc H|alth Et3^e|^^ Mantralaya, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Engmeer-isi-Oiief, Departewift of Publw Haaltili Engineering, Civil Lines, Raipur (CUhattisgarii) 3. Executive Engineer, Dejpaxtmetrt of I^Iic Kealtih Engmeermg, Prqject 8ub INvision Ne. IH. Disteict Raipur (Chliattisgarh) 4, Sanjay Khote, Assistant En^ine^r, C/o Qffice of Chief Engiaeer, ^ubUc Ifealth En^aeemig, EiAiUc Health Engineering, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) . WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OE IMDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. » Present: Shri Saruay K. A^rawah Advoc^te ferthe petitioner. Smt. SmitaGhai, P^iel Lawyer withShEiY.S.ThaJkur,D^puty Ajdvocate General fw fhe 8tate^esp©ndetrts1 te 3. ORAJLORDER (Passed on 28th day of July, 2008) , 1. With the consetit ofthe parties, ihc matter is taken up for hearmg faalty. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thM the petitio^er does iiot want to press this petition on merits at fhis stage. However, the p^titionqk may be paimtted to make a representation befbre tie concemed aufhorities witfiin wperiod of three days and the same may be directedto be decided withinthe prescribed time. 3. Shri Thakur. leamed counsel appearing fbr the State submits tfiat iftfae repx^sentation is made, fhe same shaU be decided by fhe concenwd airthwity witihm a paiod oftv?o weeks from. the date of receipt of representation. Shri nialaur, B>eputy Advocate General, forther submits that no coercive steps shall be tafcen, tfll tie disposat ofthe representatson. ^ 4. I hope and trust that the State Govemment shall exainme tiie r^presentation objectively in accordance with law and guidelines, issued by the Goveraiment, time to time. . -.: . •••-' .' --: ; -' 5. In view offoregoing. the petition staads disposed of. No order asto cos^s. 6. Consequently. IA. No. 1, application for stay/interim reliefc also stancte dispesed ©f, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt