IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6693 of 2011 1. Pawan Kumar SON OF SRI HARINANDAN PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF GAMHARIYA P.S. SAUR BAZAR, DISTRICT SAHARSA. 2. SUNIL KUMAR SON OF SRI THAKUR PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF KHURASAN, P.O. RASOLPUR, P.S. BANMA ITHARI, SAHARSA. 3. ASHOK KUMAR YADAV SON OF SRI SHITAL PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF SAKARPURA, P.S. MADHEPURA, MADHEPURA. 4. UMESH KUMAR SON OF LATE MAHESHWARI PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF SATOKHAR, P.O. KATAIYA, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, MADHEPURA. 5. SURESH YADAV SON OF SRI JAIKRISHAN PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF RUPAULI, P.S. SIGIYAUN, P.S. GAMHA RIYA, MADHEPURA. 6. RANJU KUMARI DAUGHTER OF SRI TARNI PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF SUKHASAN, P.S. MADHEPURA, MADHEPURA. 7. ASHOK KUMAR BHARTI SON OF SRI MAHENDRA PRASAD YADAV RESIDENT OF SATOKHAR, P.O. KATAIYA, P.S. SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2 05/08/2011 Petitioners had approached the High Court earlier but chose to get their names deleted in C.W.J.C. No. 302 of 2009 for whatever be the reason. This writ application is again being filed looking for a relief or direction that they be given an opportunity for consideration for regularisation on the ground that they have worked in daily wage capacity between the years - 2 - 1989 and 1993-94. Thereafter they had been removed because the college in question was closed. The only reason for filing this writ application is that the government has extended cut off date for consideration of the claims of such daily wager from 1985 to 1990 which would be evident from annexure 2 to the writ application. Annexure-2 has some relevance for the people who have been working in any capacity or remained associated with the respondents but it cannot be interpreted in favour of such people who had ceased to work or were disengaged more than 15-20 years ago. No case for any direction is made out in this writ application in the facts and circumstances of the case. This writ application is dismissed even otherwise being barred principles of constructive res judicata. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)