IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25514 of 2009 MD.EKWAL S/o Md. Imtiyaz Ali Khan Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. F.I.R. is though for kidnapping but none is named. As submitted, family members are there only to state petitioner’s name but all of them are stating about their coming to know the name by the victim, who is examined himself in the case in which he does not name anyone, rather stating that culprits were naming abc only. In the case, victim voluntarily came back his home but he remained for several days in captivity of accused persons. So, any kind of evidence including identification in a parade which is possible which is possible only after petitioner’s arrest but they are evading it. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)