IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1932 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2009 Suman Khanna .......Petitioner Versus Prem Kumar ....Respondent Present: Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner states that the tenant has surrendered possession of the property to the landlord and wishes to place on record the affidavit of the tenant. The notice has not been even issued to the respondent and it is not possible to vouch for the contentions put forward. 2. The civil revision petition is dismissed on the statement of the landlord that no order of the Court is necessary. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 29, 2009 Pankaj*