IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2006 SHRI VINAY H. PRABHU VERLEKAR, ....Petitioner MAPUSA GOA. Versus NISHIT M. PRABHU VERLEKAR AND 2 ....Respondents ORS., Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. S. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2. Coram:- V.C.DAGA, J. Date:- 3rd August, 2006 P.C. On the motion made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, he is allowed to withraw this petition. It is needless to mention that if the petitioner decides to file another affidavit bringing in tune with the documents available on record, in that event, it would be open for the trial Court to consider as to whether or not the said affidavit should be taken on record, on its merits, after hearing the parties to the suit. With these observations, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. V.C.DAGA, J. ssm.