1 CP-142-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 142 OF 2011 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL N. 31 OF 2005 Sayed Aqueel Ahmed Quadri ... Petitioner (Orig. appellant) vs. Nooruzia Qadri .. Respondent (Org.appellant/contemnor) Mr. A.A.Maniyar,Advocate, for the petitioner. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 2nd August, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is a former husband of the respondent. In the petition filed by the respondent, decree of divorce was passed by the Family Court. That decree was challenged by the present petitioner in the Family Court Appeal No. 31/2005. That appeal was disposed of by the Judgment and order dated 18.7.2009 and decree of divorce was confirmed by the High Court. The High Court by the aforesaid order also directed the present petitioner to pay amount of Rs.5 lakh to the respondent. The amount was to be kept in fixed deposit in the name of their son Sayed Reyhan Ahmed Quadri but the fixed deposit receipts were to remain in 2 CP-142-11.sxw custody of the respondent. She was also allowed to withdraw the interest amount and utilise the same for the education/medical expenses of their son Sayed Reyhan Ahmed Quadri. The petitioner has filed this Contempt Petition contending that she is not using the money for that purpose. No such grievance is made by the son, who is a beneficiary of that order. The son is living with respondent. He could move appropriate application for violation of that order if he has any grievance. I do not find any substance in the present Contempt Petition. 3. Therefore, the Contempt Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)