.'B^^'A ^.* ^>^^-^ y^" Other Matter (S.B.; IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G. W. P. N0. ^f. _2-2006 t 1 ^^^^% H^?S. iSi^ss' aeu Petitioner Satrupa Bai Wd/o Late Girdhari Lal, Aged about 3 1 years R/o Village fSdhi, Tehsil - Patan, Dist : Durg- (C.G.1 Versu_s Resuondents 1. ,-'-^' •r?r^. ^,'^/- % G o 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The PnncipteX" Secretary, ^ Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Supdt. Of Police, Durg, Dist : Durg-fC.G.l WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA \ ..J\ tW 'a:' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH :BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA.J, PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P. No.696/2006 Satrupa Bai Versus State of Chhattisgarh and another Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitytion ofliidia Appearance: Shri N.K. Chaterjee, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondents. ORAL- ORDER (Passedon 13.01.2011) Heard. 2. Considering that this petition has been filed in the year 2006 praying for proper investigation and for compensation and learned counsel for the parties are not in a position to inform the Court the result of criminal case, this petltion is finally disposed off, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court if the cause still survives for consideration. 3. In so far as claim for compensation is concemed, if the petitioner moves appropriate application before the Collector, Durg, the claim for compensation shall be considered ^and decided in Praveen -2- accordance with the provision contained in Rule 12 (4) of the Scheduled Castes 85 Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 and the compensation shall be paid to the petitioner, if not already paid. Sd/- ^.M. Stazvastava 3udge -:1 .l-^l 1,>!''S'-' ~'x -i-^ •;~1~