C3 HIGH coun'r OF cnmmsGARH. nxLAspun Writ petition (sy go.2224 of zoos Smt. Neera Bai Wfo." Knndan Ram Yadav, aged about 65 years R10. Village, Past &. Tehsil Lohara, District Durg (C.G.) PETITIONER Versus State of Chhath'sgarh, Thmugh the. Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Manhalaya Raipur, C.G. Engineer in Chief, Puhlic Works Dcpartment, Near Akashwam', Raipur, C.G. 3 Chief Eng'neer, Public Works Depaltment, Near Akashwam', Raipur, CG, 4 Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Balod Division, District Durg, 0G. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Appearance: Shri N.K. Vyas, counsel for the pefitioner. 8111i Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Gavt. Advocate for the State] respondents RESPONDENTE mm. omen (110430031 SUNIL KUMAR BINHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner snhmifs that the facts and question of law involved in the pmsent writ peiih'on are Similar to that of W.P.No. 4135/ 2004 (M.A. Hakim ~Vs- State of M.P. (Now C.G,) and others), which has already been disposed of by onier dated 28.8.2006. Against the order passed in the said case, one S.L.P. was filed in. Supreme. Cmut which was also dismissed. He further submits that thereafter, a review petition was iiled, which was also dismissed. Thus fhe case is squarely covered by the said decision. 2 w.P, (S) No.2224 of 200s Shri Ajay Dwimadi, Dy. Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State. submits that it is not in dispute that this matter is covered by ‘fhe decision of NLA. Hakim’s case: (Supra) and this petition can be disposad 0f in the terms of the order passed in MA. Hakim’s CaSC. In vim of the above joint sfatement made at thc bar, this petition is disposed of in terms 0f the order passed in W.P. No, 4135/2004 (NLA. Hakim -Vs- State of M.P. (Naw CG.) and others), which was dacided on 28.8.200E. However, the mh'efls} claimed in the writ yetition and to he granted to the petitioner in ierms of the moat passed in W.P. No. 4135/2004 (MA. Hakim’s case (supran shall be subject to the vermnaiion of the fads plonded by the. petitioner in the writ petition. No onier as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vath' 9,“ -:"’"ZJ".