1 3 S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.101/2008. Sanwar Lal Vs. Rock Phosphate Mazdoor Sangh & Ors. Date of Order :: 23rd April 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Sanjay Mathur, for the petitioner. ..... BY THE COURT: Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the impugned order dated 14.03.2008, with reference to the copy of plaint as produced on record by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is unable to find any jurisdictional error in the order impugned wherein the learned Trial Court has, while rejecting the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), observed that the question about authority and competence of the plaintiff to maintain the suit would essentially remain a matter of evidence; that the dispute in the present suit in relation to the trade union concerned cannot be said to be covered under the Industrial Disputes Act and other objections regarding notice etc. could also be decided only in the suit. The plaintiff has essentially filed the suit seeking the relief of perpetual injunction while alleging constitution of the 2 executive by the defendants to be illegal and cause of action having arisen for the defendants proclaiming such constitution of the executive on 18.02.2008 and for the defendants not refraining from using the name of the plaintiff Mazdoor Sangh. Looking to the nature of the suit as discernible from the plaint averments, it cannot be said on the reasons and grounds as stated in the application that the plaint is required to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Impugned order calls for no interference. The revision petition is, therefore, rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI ), J. Mohan/