... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3915 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.23838 OF 2002 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri C.M. Lokesh for the Applicant. Shri Praful B. Shah for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 08, 2006. : JUNE 08, 2006. : JUNE 08, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant. Shri Shah appearing for the Respondents stated that clients have withdrawn papers from him. Perusal of the Application for condonation of delay shows that delay is of more than one year. In view of the averments made in Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. However, the Applicant will have to pay costs to the Respondents. Accordingly, Application for condonation of delay is allowed subject to condition that the Applicant will pay costs of Rs.2,500/- to the Respondents within period of six weeks from today. Payment of costs will be a condition precedent. Deposit of the amount of costs in this Court within the stipulated time will be treated as sufficient compliance with this order. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE