IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13519 of 2011 Vikash Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 12.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Jewelleries, mobiles, cash and other articles are looted in a dacoity committed in the house of informant and from petitioner’s possession a looted mobile is recovered. It is explained by the petitioner that the same was gifted to him by his phuphiya Sasur and further for his arrest, a complaint is also lodged on his behalf that he was arrested in the case on 22.01.2011 and remanded on 29.01.2011 makes the allegation more serious as to defend himself from having in his possession one of the looted mobiles is involving an agency in criminal activity. What happened in between 22.01.2011 and 29.01.2011, its purpose is missing. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)