IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8293 of 2000 Date of decision:26.08.2009 Devi Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D.S.Nalwa, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) The writ petition seeks for mandamus against the Government for taking up prosecution under Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act or in the alternative for reinstatement as per the award of the Labour Court. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the prosecution had been launched subsequently and the workman had also been reinstated. The writ petition has, therefore, been rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 26.08.2009 sanjeev