THE HI0GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 320 of 2009 Sandeep Agrawal S/o Late Sri Bhagwan Agrawal …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ..…. Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; document filed by the parties; and perusal of the entire record, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 22.04.2009 Shiv