CWP (T) No.13848 of 2008. 19.11.2009. Present: Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. Respondent No.2 initiated process for filling up the post of TGT (NM) as per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules. The written screening test for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (Non-medical) was conducted on 5th June, 2005. 723 candidates qualified the written test. The personal interview was held w.e.f. 17.3.2006 to 29.4.2006 and 16.5.2006 to 18.5.2006. The petitioner also qualified the written test and was called for personal interview. She has submitted an application under SC (UR) category. Respondents No.1 and 2 have recommended the names of 242 candidates under different categories/sub categories. Five remaining posts of SC (WFF) category could not be recommended for want of suitable and eligible candidates. The petitioner could be considered only against her category i.e. SC (UR). She did not fall under the zone of consideration on the basis of merit list prepared by respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Kaundal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently argued that the candidature of the petitioner should have been considered against the remaining unfilled five vacancies of SC (WFF). This plea merits rejection. The petitioner belongs to SC (UR) category and her candidature could not be considered against SC (WFF). Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. 19th November, 2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)