IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8936 of 2010 KALOT RAM, son of Late Bawan, resident of Bibiganj, P.O. Danapur Cantt., District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Director General Defence Estate, Ministry of Defence, Rakahs Sampda Bhawan, Palam Road, New Delhi 110 010. 2. Principal Director, Central Command, Defence Estate, Ministry of Defence, Kariappa Road, Lucknow (U.P.) 3. Commandment of Servo Job, Sub Area, Danapur Cantonment Board Office, Danapur Cantt. Distt. Patna. 4. Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Office, Danapur Cantonment, Danapur, District Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 19.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Raghib Ahsan, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for the respondents. The grievances of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of June, 2003 from Class IV post while working under respondent no.4, his full retiral dues have not been settled and paid despite representation, as contained in Annexure 3. Mr Ahsan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation filed by the petitioner did not contain the relevant details so that the matter may be considered. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh detailed representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Office, Danapur Cantonment, Danapur, District 2 Patna (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of eight weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest. and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. In case the representation is allowed, the pensionary benefits may also be revised. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims/any part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)