THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22508 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner feels aggrieved by an order of removal from service. He has availed the remedy of appeal and review. Sri P.V.Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the order of removal is contrary to law and suffers from several legal and factual defects. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy by way of an industrial dispute. This Court would consider the feasibility of interfering with the order of removal of a workman, if only it is passed by an authority, who is not conferred with the jurisdiction or whether it is passed in patent violation of principles of natural justice. In the instant case, the order of removal was passed, after conducting domestic enquiry. The petitioner can avail the remedy under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The power of the Labour Court is far wider than that of this Court. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy of raising an industrial dispute. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dt:11.08.2011 GJ