IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2010 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9480 of 2010(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PUSHPALATHA, W/O.NARAYANANUNNI, VADAKKEPPATT HOUSE,THIRUVEGAPPURA,OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE, OTTAPALAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,THIRUVEGAPPURA VILLAGE, OTTAPALAM, 4. SANKRANARAYANAN,S/O.RAVUNNI NAIR, PACHERY HOUSE,THIRUVEGAPPURA,OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 9480 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that the property purchased by her from the 4th respondent for valid sale consideration is being proceeded against by the Revenue authorities, in respect of the amounts stated as recoverable from the 4th respondent who is the 'defaulter'; stating that the conveyance is hit under Section 44 (2) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, which is under challenge in this Writ Petition. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P5 order passed by the 2nd respondent in this regard has already been subjected to challenge by filing Ext.P6 Revision Petition under Section 83 (1) before the first respondent. It is stated that the petitioner has also preferred Ext.P7 Interlocutory Application for stay; which is pending consideration before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is mainly to cause the above proceedings to be finalised immediately; lest irreparable loss and injuries should be caused to the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who submits that the issue in the present Writ Petition is very much WP(C) No.9480/2010 2 connected with the subject matter of WP(C) 6087/2010, which was filed by the defaulter, i.e., the 4th respondent herein and after considering the facts and circumstances, this Court has already directed the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in the Revision Petition stated as filed by the said respondent. 4. In the above circumstance, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 Revision Petition in accordance with law, of course after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all concerned, which shall be finalised as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that all further coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance till such final orders are passed on Ext.P6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc