WPMS. No. 218 of 2010 Hon’ble V.K.Bist, J. Sri Zafar Ullah Siddiquie, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Present, petition has been filed for setting aside the Orignal Suit no. 188 of 2009 Smt. Garima Agarwal Vs. Ashish Goel pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haridwar. Brief facts which are relevant to the present controversy are that the respondent instituted suit under section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Court of Judge Family Court, Haridwar which was registered as case no. 203 of 2006. The suit was dismissed by the learned Judge Family Court, Haridwar. Aggrieved by the order passed by Judge Family Court, Haridwar the respondent filed First Appeal no. 67 of 2007 in this Court. The appeal was finally disposed of on 7.11.2008 in terms of compromise executed between the both parties. According to the settlement deed the petitioner was required to pay Rs 7,50,000/- within a period of 6 months from that date towards full and final settlement claim of respondent as “Stridhan” and ailment and claim of her own maintenance. As per compromise the petitioner was also required to pay Rs 7,50,000/- in the name of his minor daughter Kumari Gulika Agarwal within a period of 90 days from that date. The petitioner deposited the required amount of Rs 7,50,000/- in the name of his minor daughter Km. Gulika Agarwal and handed over a bank draft to respondent on 31.03.2009. But the amount of Rs 7,50,000/- to respondent could not be paid with in time. In the mean time the respondent instituted a Suit No. 188 of 2009 for recovery of Rs 7,50,000/- along with interest and other expenses. After institution of suit the petitioner paid the remaining amount of Rs 7,50,000/- to the respondent in the month of February 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits before the Court that though the entire amount of settlement between the parties has already been given to the respondents for harassing the petitioner and is pursuing the present suit and he requested that the suit can not be proceeded in view of the compromise arrived between the parties on 7.11.2008 and also in view of the judgment delivered by this Court in First Appeal No. 66 of 2007. Since the remaining amount of Rs 7,50,000/- has been paid during the pendency of the suit, this Court will does not think it proper to entertain the petitioner at this stage. It will be open for the petitioner to move an application before the Civil Judge (Senior Divison) Haridwar, mentioning therein that the entire amount has been paid by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 16.03.2010