1 ASWP-9924-2010 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9924 OF 2010 Jyotsna H. Patil ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents Mr.Uday Warunjikar for petitioner. Mr.Dilip Bodake for resp.nos.3 and 4. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. August 20, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Warunjikar, the learned counsel for the petitioner who claims to be working as an Assistant Teacher in the Secondary School run by the respondent no.3 – Society continuously from 18/6/1996. The 2 ASWP-9924-2010 grievance raised in this petition is that despite her representations she is not being paid the regular salary. It is also pointed out that her appointment has not yet been approved by the respondent no.2. 2. Shri Vaibhav Patil has filed affidavit in reply on behalf of the respondent no.3 and the Deputy Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Thane has filed affidavit in reply on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2. Reference has been made to the letters dated 29/3/2007 and 4/8/2008 addressed by the respondent no.2 to respondent nos.3 and 4 calling upon them to submit the proposal seeking approval for the appointment of the petitioner and one more Assistant Teacher as against three vacant posts. However, the proposal submitted thereafter is not in complete requirements. 3. We have been assured by Mr.Bodake, on taking instructions from the management, that a fresh proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner shall be submitted within a period of two weeks from today with due compliances and the respondent no.2 shall process the said proposal and pass his final order within four weeks from the receipt of the proposal. 3 ASWP-9924-2010 4. Petition is disposed off in terms of the above directions. All other claims are left open. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)