1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1043/2002 Mulji Harji Patel (Deleted) Legal Representatives : Meenaben wd/o Mulji Patel and others ...Versus... Shri Rampratap Ramchandra Dharmadaya Fund through its Trustees -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [S/Shri A.V. Bhide & M.M. Pathak, Advs. for applicants] [Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for respondents] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 25.07.2007. The applicants being aggrieved by the concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below have filed this civil revision application. Shri Bhide, learned Counsel for the applicants made following submissions ; (1) That the Trust accepted rent even after 2 termination of tenancy. (2) That the Trust filed suit without permission under Section 51 of the Bombay Public Trust Act. (3) Certified copy of Schedule – I was not produced in the Trial Court. Having heard Counsel for the rival parties and having gone through the impugned judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, I find that both the Courts below have concurrently negativated the above submissions. Looking to the legal position, I do not think that the Courts below have committed any error in answering the issues against the petitioner. The findings being concurrent and correct, the Civil Revision Application is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw