HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE GHHATTISGARH ; BU-ASPUR SINGLE BENCH : Hon'bleShri S.R. Nayak, CJ. Writ PetiUonNo. 637 OF 200S PETITIQNER .» M/s Shree Nakoda Ispat Ltd., Near raihiray crossing Mowa Raipur-492(X)7 Through Manager, Shri Rajendra Tjwari, S/o Shri B.N. Thwari, Aged about 32 yeare, Raipur (C.GJ .<if RESPONDENTS \fersus 1. Unionoflndia Through Secretary, Minisfry ofRailways NewDelhi. 2. ^General Manager, S,E£.Railway, Headquarters Offlce, Bilaspur(C.G.) 3. The Chief Commercial ^4anager SEARailvray Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. The Sr. DIvisional Commercial Manager, S.E.C.Railway, District-Bilaspur Present:ShriH.S.Ahluwalia.learnedcounselfortheDetitioner. Shri AbKishek Sinha, teamed counsel for the caveatora. ORALORDER (Passedon 7'" February, 2006) The complaint brought before this Court by vray of this writ petition could be a complaint that could be made before the Tribunal as envisaged underSection 36 <rf the Railways Act, 1989 (for short 'the Acf). The dispute brought before the Court essentially falls within the domainof appreciation of facts; therefore, it Is appropriate that the petitioner, in the first instance, should workout statytory remedies provided under the Act. .J ^. -£ /^.'sA. aaiisnf }3iq3 -/PS •euiffiossoiqonuiinoqtjMjspjos^udojddessBdpuestUBssqtjapisuoo ||ei|s leunquj. sqi teifl pstsn4 si tj 'py a4»^ 9e uoitase japun |eunqui ayi aJo^sq jepjo 4ioin30|je}U! jo^ uoiieoiiddB yB LBIM BUO|B luiBidujoa seiu jauoiiiisd sifl;! ieifl psissjip s! i! 'JOAaMOH •pessjiusip AiBujpJoooe S! ti -uomsd ijJMsiifl uiBysiue o} suiiosp | 'punojB ijoijs siifl uo •ssipsusj Aioir4B)s snoioeoua 'eAiieujqiB Buiisneipo inoifliA uonniBSuoo S4»p ggg aiogjV-ispunvnoo SIIB 0} qsm otjsuoiljod siBJO^ uoBB3y!(snfous! sjsqj. .y <i-L ^ —-e—