:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8890 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 8890 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 8890 OF 2005 Prasanna Uttam Vatkar ..Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Shri Vilas Tapkir Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur AGP for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2006 DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2006 DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The Petitioner challenges the Order dated 12.9.2005 passed by the Respondent No.2. 3. The claim of the Petitioner for employment on compassionate grounds has been rejected as the petitioner’s father is already employed, as also while the petitioner was minor, his guardian was also employed in Satara Zilla Parishad. :2: 4. The rejection of the claim for employment on compassionate grounds having been made for valid and lawful reasons, there is no question of interference therein in the writ petition. However, in case any Government Resolution could come to any assistance of the Petitioner, nothing prevents the Petitioner from making a proper representation to the Respondent No.2 for such employment and in case such a representation is made, the Respondent No.2 may consider the same in accordance with the provisions of law. With this observation, the Petition is rejected. (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)