CW 208/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.208/2009 Bharti Sanwlani Versus Jagdish Tikkiwal & Ors. Date of Order ::: 20/02/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Ganesh Sharma, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed by petitioner (plaintiff) assailing order dt. 28/11/2008 (Ann.8) passed by Rent Tribunal (Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn)/Judl.Mag. No.5), Jaipur City. Petitioner (plaintiff) filed suit before the Tribunal U/s 9 of Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (“Rent Act”) for adjudication. However, as per provisions of Rent Act, all documents on which plaintiff wants to rely, has to be filed at the time of presentation of the plaint, itself. After written statement was filed and also rejoinder filed by petitioner (plaintiff), evidence was led by both the parties by 08/08/08 and the matter was ripen for final hearing, at this stage, petitioner filed application dt.11/11/08 U/s 21 of the Rent Act with the prayer that two alleged relevant documents, viz. (i) business directory of year 2007 and visiting card – extract whereof placed as Annexures 6 & 7 for being taken on record. Learned Rent Tribunal after taking into CW 208/09 //2// consideration submissions, observed that no justification has come forward from the side of plaintiff that if it were relevant documents, why could not have been produced at the relevant stage either at the time of filing of the suit or even at a later stage when evidence was being led by parties. After taking note whereof, it was observed that matter has ripen for final hearing and there was no justification for the delay in producing documents in question. This court does not find any manifest error which may call for interference in the order impugned. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/208CW09Fb20Rnt.doc