IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 423 OF 2008 ANKUSH R. NAIK ... Petitioner Versus SUJATA SANZGIRY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Agnelo F. Diniz, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M. S. Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Iftikar Aga, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. Vahidulla, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 17th July, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. A. F. Diniz, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner. The Award between the parties was made rule of the Court by Order dated 3-6-1994 under Section 17 in terms of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The proceedings for execution were filed on 28-8-1994 much before the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 came into force on 25-1-1996. The said proceedings were bound to be continued and terminated in the designated Court under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940. There is absolutely no merit in this petition. The same is hereby rejected in limine. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.