1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 816/2007 (Yamunabai Shamrao Warke VERSUS Manager, Western Coalfields Limited Nagpur & another ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Lahiri, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Darda, counsel for the R-2. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : MARCH 5, 2008. Heard. The counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition, in fact, is directed against the communication dated 06.01.2006, whereby the petitioner is denied employment by respondent on the ground that she is a second wife which, in fact, is not proved. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file the representation against the said order to the respondent no.2 within a period of one week and prayed that if such representation is made, respondent no.2 may be directed to decide the same within the stipulated period. Mr. Darda, the learned counsel for the 2 respondent no.2, states that if such representation is made, the respondent shall consider the same afresh according to law and procedure applicable in this regard and also consider the grievance of the petitioner on its own merits and decide the same within six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.2, no fresh direction to the respondent no.2 is necessary. However, it is made clear that the impugned communication dated 06.01.2006 shall not come in way of reconsideration of the issue afresh by the respondent. However, if the representation is rejected, the order dated 06.01.2006 shall come into operation automatically. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE APTE