IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9996 of 2010 Date of decision: 07.07.2010 Puran ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Pankaj Chugh, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 78 dated 22.01.2010 registered under Section 376, 506, 511 read Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sadar, District Hisar. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI-Satbir Singh, states that evidence of the prosecutrix has been recorded, wherein, she has specifically named the present petitioner and has corroborated the prosecution story. The remaining evidence is yet to be recorded. No ground for grant of bail is made out. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 07.07.2010 mohan