APPP-426-11==.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.426 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.960 OF 2011 Fayyaz Abdul Hakim Shaikh ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ D.N. Nagar Police Station ... Respondent Mr. Rakesh D. Dave for the Applicant. Mr. M.R. Tidke for the Respondent-State. The I.O. is present in person. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 9 TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. It is a fact that in spite of the bail order, that was passed in favour of the Applicant on 8th July, 2011, the Applicant continues to be in custody on account of his inability to furnish a surety in the required amount. APPP-426-11==.sxw 2 Dixit 3. Mr. Dave, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that the Applicant is ready to deposit some cash as security and, in addition, would make his father and mother stand surety for him. This seems to be reasonable. 4. It is, therefore, directed that the Applicant be released on his furnishing his father and mother as sureties for him in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each, and on his depositing, additionally, cash of Rs.10,000/- to make up the total bail amount. It is clarified that, if the father and mother of the Applicant offer themselves as sureties for the Applicant in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each, the Court may not insist on Solvency Certificate from them, though other particulars and details, such as relationship, address, occupation, etc., may be verified. 5. The Criminal Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]