THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14381 of 2006 Dated 29th June, 2010 Between: Kaiku Venkateshu. …Petitioner And The Station House Officer, Maidukuru and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao Counsel for respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Home The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in Crime Nos.86 and 95 of 2006 as illegal and arbitrary. On the basis of the reports given by the petitioner, the abovementioned two crimes were registered. As the follow up action including investigation and filing of appropriate reports before the jurisdictional Magistrate was not taken by the Police, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, it is, inter alia, stated that on the report lodged by the petitioner on 26.05.2006, Crime No.86 of 2006 was registered for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 355 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(i) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘SC ST Act’) on 25.05.2006 and in pursuance thereof, Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Mydukur, was directed to take up investigation. He has further stated that he has instructed Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Mydukur, to complete investigation expeditiously and file charge sheet. Subsequently, another report was lodged by the petitioner on 08.06.2006, which was registered as Crime No.95 of 2006 for the offence under Section 3(i) (x) of SC ST Act and that the Investigating Officer has examined as many as eleven witnesses and recorded their detailed statements. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that in Crime No.86 of 2006, charge sheet was filed after deleting Section 3 of SC ST Act and the case was taken cognizance by the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Proddatur, as C.C.No.121 of 2006 and that the said case ended in acquittal of the accused on 20.06.2009. With regard to Crime No.95 of 2006, a final report was filed by the Police referring the complaint as false on 30.07.2006. Having regard to the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the case does not require further adjudication. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Liberty is, however, given to the petitioner to pursue his further legal remedies. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, W.P.M.P.No.17911 of 2006 filed by the petitioner is also dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th June, 2010 GHN