IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11160 of 2009 Date of Decision : June 29, 2010. Bhula Ram .....Petitioner versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has averred that he was owner in possession of land measuring 87 kanals 8 marls within the revenue estate of village Kheri Nangal which was acquired by the Haryana Government for development and utilization of Sector-24, HUDA at Panipat. He submits that though in the draw of lots, he was not successful for allotment of plot under the Oustees Quota, however, such an allotment cannot be confined to one urban estate only, rather the unsuccessful oustees need to be offered plots in the other urban estates developed by HUDA in the same town. This claim has been put forth by the petitioner before the respondent- authorities vide representation dated 17.10.2008 (Annexure P-7) which is stated to be still pending consideration. C.W.P.No .11160 of 2009 2 In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula and the Administrator, HUDA, Rohtak to consider the above mentioned claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. June 29, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE