IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9354 of 2009 Date of decision:04.05.2010 Partap Singh ….Petitioner versus Union Territory, Chandigarh, through Estate Officer, Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ------ Present: Mr. Rajiv Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ----- K.Kannan, J (Oral) 1. The writ petition challenges the order of cancellation of allotment for non-payment of installments for allotment of a booth. It is an admitted case that the property was allotted the booth for a price of Rs.70,500/- and after payment of 25% of cost, the balance was to be paid in the shape of 3 annual installments. It appears that the petitioner fell into default and after due notices, the cancellation order was issued. 2. The allotment relates to a small shop and since the amount involved is not large, I only directed the parties to bring a memo of calculation that would include interest and penalty. The Assistant Civil Writ Petition No.9354 of 2009 - 2 - Collector, Estate Office, U.T., Chandigarh has worked out an amount of Rs.1,21,039/- as the amount upto 10.01.2010. The amount shall be rounded off with subsequent interest ,as well, to Rs.1,25,000/- and the said amount shall be paid within a period of 4 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order. The impugned order of cancellation of allotment is set aside. If the amount is not paid as directed within the time stipulated, the order of cancellation of allotment and resumption of property already made, shall stand revived. 3. The writ petition is ordered on the above terms. There shall be however no directions as to costs. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 04.05.2010 sanjeev