•^' C^^h'/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDJCATEJRE AT BILASPUR (C,G«) ^ ^' i ^- pETITIONER RESPOIMDENTS -..>^^" Mrit petition No.<3>S^7 of 2003. Manharan Singh S/o Ripudaman Singh aged 54 years, Occupation — Govt. Service, resident of House No, H-2 Jrrigatlon Coiony, tTagdalla^Champa^ Distt, Janjgi.r-Charapa (C.G.) V e r s u s s 1< State of Chhattisgarh Through : Collector, Janjglr Distt. J'anjgir-Champa (C .G. ) 2. S.D.0•(Revenue) Champa , Distt^ tJanjgir-Chamapa (C«G») 3, The Tehsildar, Champa Distto Janjgj.r-Chainapa (C^G.)< 4« The Mininiata Bango Bandh Division No<.2 Champa Throgh : The Execative^Ej^-te^e^ Champa ^ Distt, Janjg ir-Chainpa (CG) 5. The Additional Collector Janjgir Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C,G*) ^^--p£IlTIONJI!^E^.^T.?.CL,E.,..2.2.6yj32,^M«^ OF IND3A —I- '~1 u^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITJONER WRIT PETSTION N0.3557 OF 2003 iVlanharan Singh RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattlsaarh & Others (Writ Petition under Artide 226/227 ofthe Constitutlon ot India) Sinate Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Go^rt. Advocate for the State. Gowrl ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 18th day of March, 2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions,none appears nor is any representation made on behaSf of the petttioner. The petltioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) In vlew of the above, the wrlt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge