IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2561 of 2009 GANESH MANDAL & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 26.2.2009 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. On the own showing of the petitioner the order passed under section 30 of the Bihar Land Ceiling(Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act is subject to a revision before the Board of Revenue under section 32 thereof. That being so, this application in absence of availing the statutory alternative remedy is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the Board of Revenue. It goes without saying that as the petitioner under misconceived advice was availing the remedy before this Court in stead of statutory remedy under section 32 of the Act, any application filed now by the petitioner before the Board of Revenue would be considered on merit after condoning the delay in filing of such application. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)