IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 10014 of 1990 Date of Decision: June 30, 2010 M.K. Aggarwal and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vikas Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. None for respondent No. 3. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. No one has put in appearance in support of the petition. Even otherwise the petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 Shri O.P. Lather have already retired. The petitioners Sarvshri M.K. Aggarwal, R.C. Mehndiratta, R.S. Rana and R.C. Mahna retired on 31.8.2003, 30.6.2004, 31.3.2004 and 31.7.2000 respectively. Even respondent No. 2 Shri O.P. Lather stood retired on 31.7.2000. The retirement of the officers might also be the reason for non- appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) June 30, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2