IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28735 of 2010 SUDHIR SINGH, S/o Sri Deolagan Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 440 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report. Specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner as well as others who have been granted bail by this Court. It has further been submitted in the facts of the case the allegation of specific overt act does not appear to be credible. Considering the same as also during investigation only one other witness named the petitioner and he is languishing in jail since about four years, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Patna in connection with S.Tr. No. 1375 of 2007 arising out of Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 73 of 2004 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will 2 be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. The Court concerned shall duly verify the identity papers of the petitioner as well as the bailors so that that there is no confusion about their identity at a later point of time. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)