1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2710 OF 2010 Sant Bhagwan Baba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Limbodi Taluka Ashti, District Beed, Through its Secretary, Shri Vijaykumar s/o Karbhari Gholhar, Age : 38 years, Occu. Service, R/o Ashti, Taluka Ashti, Dist. Beed ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, in the Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Fort, Mumbai - 32 2. The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune 3. The Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad 4. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Beed ..RESPONDENTS Mr Vithal M. Chate, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr K.J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ DATE : 20th April, 2010 2 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V.HARDAS , J ] Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has tendered before us copy of judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.345 of 2010, Asha Sevabhavi Sanstha vs. State of Maharashtra & others, and companion petitions, dated 8.4.2010. The learned A.G.P. for respondents states that in the light of the said judgment, the respondents would reconsider the proposal of the petitioner, in accordance with law, before 31st May, 2010. In the light of that statement and in the light of the judgment adverted above, therefore, this writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondents for a decision of the proposal of the petitioner afresh, in accordance with law, before 31st May, 2010. The decision on the proposal of the petitioner be communicated to the petitioner. 3 Rule made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE amj/wp2710.10