1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.179 OF 2008 Raosaheb Vishwanath Tagad and anr. .. Appellants (Orig.Accused) Versus State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri S.J.Salgare, Advocate holding for Smt.S.S.Jadhav, Advocate for appellant No.1 Shri Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for appellant No.2 Shri K.J.Ghute Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.1 Shri V.S.Bedre, Advocate for respondent No.2 - absent CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ DATE : 5th March 2010 PER COURT : 1. This appeal has been circulated before us for effecting a correction in our judgment relating to the number of the Sessions trial. This Court, by its judgment dated 18.2.2010 partly allowed the Criminal Appeal and maintained the conviction of appellant No.1 while acquitting appellant – original accused No.2. It appears that at paragraph 1 of the judgment the number of the Sessions Case which was quoted by us was 144 of 2007. The aforesaid number was quoted by us on the basis of the copy of the judgment provided in the paper-book. It appears that from the record and proceedings that the same number was quoted in the original judgment which, however, came to be corrected subsequently to “Sessions Case No.144 of 2006”. It, therefore, appears to be a clerical mistake in our judgment and, therefore, needs to be corrected. 2 2. We accordingly direct that in paragraph 1 of our judgment the number of the Sessions Case i.e. 144 of 2007 be corrected to read as “Sessions Case No.144 of 2006”. Certified Copy, if issued to the appellants be issued afresh after carrying out the necessary correction. 3. Consequently, we permit the appellants to effect the necessary correction in the memorandum of appeal and the paper-book. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) (vvr/179.08criapeal)