THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL NO.232 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: The appellant herein is the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the decree and judgment in A.S.No.21 of 1999, dated 29.8.2003, passed by the VII Additional District Judge, Madanapalli, confirming the decree and judgment passed by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Madanapalli, in O.S.No.264 of 1992, dated 30.3.1998, this second appeal has been preferred. Both the courts below have concurrently held that the plaintiff has failed to establish his possession and enjoyment over the plaint schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit and therefore he is not entitled for permanent injunction. In view of the aforesaid concurrent findings, I do not see any substantial question of law that arises for consideration to admit the second appeal. The second appeal is accordingly dismissed. __________________ 21.8.2009 kpr