1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO.66 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3159 OF 2008 Mr.Vijay P. Dharwadkar. ...Petitioner. Vs. Mrs. Kavita V. Dharwadkar. ...Respondent. .... Mr.Vijay P. Dharwadkar, Petitioner in person. Ms.Kokila Kalra for the Respondent. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. June 25, 2008. P.C.: Review Petition is thoroughly misconceived. No ground for review has been made out. The order dated 5th May 2008 records that the parties were present before the Court and that a settlement was arrived at between them which was duly understood by the parties. The Consent Terms have been signed by the parties and by their Advocates. The statements which have been made in 2 paragraphs 7 and 8 of the Review Petition furnish no ground for a review and they are merely an afterthought to avoid compliance of the obligation which has been cast upon the Petitioner to provide maintenance. There is no merit in the Review Petition which is accordingly dismissed. .....