THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.575 OF 2011 25th July, 2011. Between: STATE OF A.P., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME (POLICE) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER .. APPELLANTS AND HAREN VENTURES PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN SINGAPORE AND HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 3, TEMASEK BOLUVARD, 01-K10 SNUTEE CITY MALL, SINGAPORE 08983 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED REP. SRI.SRIRAMOJI PREMKUMAR AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.575 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 1. Heard learned Advocate General, as also Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned senior counsel for the respondents. Regard being had to the fact that the money is likely to go out of the country by dint of the impugned direction, we made it clear at the outset that grant of interim stay sought in the Miscellaneous Petition cannot brook the delay. Responding to our such inclination, Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned senior counsel for the respondents contended that it would be appropriate to finally dispose of the Writ Appeal itself, accordingly appeal is taken up for final disposal at the very admission stage. 2. As observed hereinabove, the impugned direction in effect, permits the writ petitioner - respondent to transmit the money to Singapore, a foreign country, coupled with the fact that the direction is passed without hearing the appellant, we are of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be met by setting aside the impugned order. Contention of Sri.Vedula Venkataramana, learned senior counsel for the respondent – writ petitioner that setting aside of the interim direction would influence the writ court to the detriment of writ petitioner’s interests, does not call for any deliberation, for the simple reason that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, obviously the interim matter has to be decided on its own merits. 3. In the aforementioned backdrop, this writ appeal succeeds. Impugned order is set aside. Respondents in the writ petition shall file counter within ten days, with an advance copy to the other side who shall be at liberty to file rejoinder within three days thereafter. Interim Relief matter shall be posted before the writ court for consideration along with the writ petition as per roster in the week commencing from 16.08.2011. Needless to say that our request to the writ court to consider the interim matter can by no stretch of imagination prevent it to dispose of the writ petition itself. Writ Appeal is allowed. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 25th July, 2011. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.575 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 25th July, 2011.