_H1GH CGURT OF CHHA’TTISG T BILASPUR @ A A wmT PE'HTEON (,3) 4792 of 2008 s, son of Shri Pati Ram .P‘, At Police Head RD. Mourya, aged 52 year Mourya, working as Dy S Quarter, Durg D£strict Durg (CG), PF i ‘I‘ITONER VERSUS RES?ONDENT 2 State of Chha‘msgar‘n, Through the Secretary, Department of Home 8L Police, Mantra‘aya, DKS Bhawam Rajpur (CG). v TIYUTION OF INDLA WRH PEALI'TEUN UNDE£_ARTICLE 226 OF 'Yr& CONS SB: Honyme Shi'i SatiSh K. A nihotri J. Shri TK. Tiwari; Advocate, appears on behaifof Shri MK. S'hri YS. Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai with Shri MRS. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. B'nac‘iari, Advocate for the pe’ritioner. V 'Presem: GRAL ORDER (Passed an Ta day of September, 2008) tioner doeS owever, the petitioner 1, With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fma‘lly. 2, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submité that the peti not want to preas this petition on merits at this stage. H ay be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities the same may he directed to be decided within a period ot‘three days and within the prescribed time. Shri Thakur, iearned counsel appearing for the State submi representation is made. the same shalt he decided by t within a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt of representation. Shri Thakur. Deputy Advocate GeneraL further submits that no coercive steps ts that if the he concerned authority wait be taken, tih the disposat ot‘the representation. is ”511 t 'n 4. i . ope ami trust that the State Government sha}! eXamine the representation objectively in accordance with law and guideiines, iSSueti by the Government, time to time. » In View offoregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 6. - Consequentiy? LA. No. I, application for grant ofinterim relief, also stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge