1 crr187-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER'S REPORT NO.187 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.3366 OF 2008 Piyush J. Gandhi & Ors .. Plaintiffs versus Shreekrishna M. Varde .. Defendant Mr.N.A.Bandodkar, 2nd Assistant to Court Receiver, present. Mr.T.R.Yadav i/by K.K.Pandey for the defendant. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 28th September 2011. P.C.: . None appears on behalf of the plaintiffs though served with the copy of the report. It is stated in the report that the original defendant having expired that he was appointed as an agent of the Court Receiver, therefore, directions be issued and particularly as to whether the Court Receiver can take forcible possession of the suit flat with the help of police. 2 Mr.T.R.Yadav appears on behalf of the heirs and states that it was the wife who has informed the plaintiff so also the Court Receiver that 2 crr187-11.doc the sole defendant-Shreekrishna Varde has expired. His wife Bina Shreekrishna Varde, Pranav Shreekrishna Varde and Devesh Shreekrishna Varde are the only persons who are occupying this flat. The wife is ready and willing to execute Agency Agreement with the Court Receiver and she shall do so within a period of two weeks from today. Statement of Mr.Yadav to this effect is accepted. If the wife executes an undertaking and states that besides her and her two sons, none other are occupying and using the suit flat, the Court Receiver shall permit her to continue as an agent but without prejudice to the right, title and interests of the parties to the suit. Report is disposed off. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)