^ -^^ c IN THB HON»BLBHIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR ^'^ ^" PETITIONER M.C.C. No. ^ W 12010 ,K.P. Goswami v^l^ .....^•3;E'i<::Att/"" lA :..s'::^^f^ ^.^^b'";^^a^-1 S/o Late Shri Narayanpuri, aged about 51 years, Laxmi Nagar, Prince Colony, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) RBSPONDENTS VBRSUS 1.^ The state of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2^ Assistant Commissioner ^ribal Welfare Department, District Raipur (C.G.) Project Officer, Kamar Development Authority, Gariaband, District Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RBSTORATION OF WRIT PETITION IS} N0.7201/2009 K.P.GOSWAMI VS. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OTHERS DISMISSED ON ?5.1(^2010 FOR WANT OF PROSECTTTION r— ^ct-^ ;:r^^ y ^ "-^ ;?^ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BiLASPUR M.C.C. No. 271 OF 2010 PetitiQnej- K.P. Goswami VERSUS Respondents : The State of Chhattlsgarh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFWRIT PETITION (S) No.7201/2009. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. ashoK Present: Shri Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORDERfORALl (Passed on this 10t)1 day of August, 2011) i.A.No.l^ This is an appiication for condonation of delay. Learned counsei appearing for the State respondents submits that the explanation as required under provisions of law, has not been submitted in the appiicatlon for condonation of delay. Thus, the appiicatlon of the petitioner for condonation of dejay may not be condoned. Having regard to the facts situation of the case, wherein, there is a delay of 40 days. The delay in filing may be compensated by impos'rtion of some cost. Thus, the deiay is condoned subject to payment of Rs.2000/- as cost to the High Court Legai Aid Committee. 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the counsel for the petitloner could not appear on account of bona Hde mistake, therefore, W.P.(S) No.7201/2009, which was dismissed on 25.02.2010, may be restoredto itsfiie. 2. Reasonabie and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(S) No.7201/2009, is restored to the originat file. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ petition and the same be Sisted for hearing. SatishK.Agnihotn Judge