IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.M-13427 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision; May 7, 2010 Shashi Bhushan Randev and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA,J.(ORAL) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. Heard. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.3, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on representation/application, already made to him by the petitioners for protection of their life and liberty. Hence, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.3, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on representation/application, for protecting their life and liberty, which is the right of every citizen under Article 21 of the constitution of India, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioners. 7.5.2010 ( Ram Chand Gupta ) meenu Judge