/€?m’a Z (2) lN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IS) No. 47> %2oo7 : /Nirbhay Ram Netam PETITIONER ' S/o Shri Lachohhan Ram Netam Age about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. SChOOL Temri, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. StateGovt.ofChhattisgarh Through :Secretary, Schooi Education Department Ministry, D.K‘S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 02 / 2. Director of Public Instruction Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Bemetara (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / r y ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. A5NIHOTRI J WRIT PETITION (5.) NO. 437 OF 2007 Nirbhay Rum Ne'l'um versus Sfa're Govt of Chhaf‘risgurh and ofhers Presenf : Mr. Ajay 5hrivusfava,counseifor The pefifioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey. Panel Lawyer for 1he Sfme/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 24*“ Day of January, zoos) 1. Laarned counsel appearing for The pefi‘l'ioner as well as learned Ponel lawyer appearing for me Sfafe/respondems join'rly submi'l’ fhaf fhe facfs and quesfion of law involved in “the present wri‘l' pei'i'iion are squareiy covered by fhe decision of fhis Cour? in 'rhe case of Yashwanf Kumar' Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Comorarian, Duty and anofber‘. 2. In subsequent maes, i.e., Wri‘i' Pefi'rion (5.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hemanf Kumar Wshwakamm vs. 51am of Chhafh‘sgarh and afhers) and other connecied mafiers, decided by 'ihis Cour'i' on 12-12-2006, pursuant +0 fhe memo da‘l'ed 23-1-1995, issued by ihe secrefary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and 1'he prospectus of Diploma in Education, (p? Examination, H' was clarified 'rha'l' ‘I'he nomenclufure of ‘l'he Basic Training Ins‘ri'tufe, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Dipioma in Educaiion, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, #he D.Ed. Cerfifica‘i'e holders are also covered by fhe decision in Wrif Pe‘l'i'rion (5.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hernam‘ Kumar l/Ilshwakarma vs. 51w: of C71haf1'is'garh and afher$ (Supra). 3. For The uforemenfioned reasons, fhe wri'l' pe‘li'l'ion is disposed of in terms of 'lhe decision of fhis Court in +he maf'I’er of Yadiwanf Kumar Bharadwqi (Supra). subject 1'0 verification of fhe fad as to whether +he peli'l'ioner has acquired D.Ed. Certificate of his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and furfher whe'lher he has been paid 'i'wo advance incremen‘is or not No order as 1'0 costs. ‘ Sd/— ' Satish K. Agnihotrl f Judge ‘ i 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 p