IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6230 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.9.2010 Nirmal Dass and others ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kumar alias Billoo and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Satbir Rathore, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The prayer of the petitioners for adducing additional evidence has been declined. They have already led their evidence in affirmative and so have the respondents. The petitioners have also led their evidence in rebuttal and after the progress of the trial to that extent, they cannot be permitted to adduce additional evidence as a matter of right, more so in view of the amended provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. The fact regarding the location of Nala was obviously expected to be in the knowledge of the petitioners as it was germane to the controversy in hand. It was their duty to lead their evidence in affirmative. Without establishing essential ingredients required for exercise of discretion by the trial court the petitioners cannot claim any relief in this revision petition when there is no error C.R.No.6230 of 2010 (O&M) -2- of jurisdiction shown to have been committed by the trial Court. Dismissed. 27.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss