PNP 1 WP5571-25.7.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5571 OF 2011 Kolhapur District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. ..Petitioner. versus State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents. ..... Mr. Sushil Nimbkar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. ...... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. 25 July 2011. P.C. : The Petitioner has moved the Collector, Kolhapur under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Collector has issued a notice dated 6 July 2011 listing the case for a hearing on 12 July 2011. The apprehension of the Petitioner is that the Collector may proceed to conduct an elaborate enquiry for adjudication contrary to the law laid down by this Court in Trade Well v. Indian Bank1 At this stage, we have no reason to presume that the Collector would not follow the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court. The Collector would be conscious of the fact that he is bound by the law laid down by the Division Bench. We therefore do not propose to exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. In the event that the Petitioner is actually aggrieved by an illegal 1 (2007) All Mah. Law R. (Cri) 1357. PNP 2 WP5571-25.7.sxw decision, it would be open to them to take out appropriate proceedings. We accordingly dispose of the Petition by directing the Collector to take an expeditious final decision on the application under Section 14 within a period of one month from the date on which a copy of this order is placed before him. (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta J.)