IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16466 of 2010 DILIP KUMAR, SON OF SRI RASHBIHARI YADAV Versus THE UNION OF INDIA THRU. CBI. With Cr.Misc. No.17240 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA, SON OF SRI ANANT SHUKLA Versus UNION OF INDIA THRU.C.B.I. ----------- 3. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 25.3.2010 and the investigation is already complete and the charge sheet has been submitted and also that the entire case is based only on documentary evidence which is already in custody of the court, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, C.B.I.(South), Patna, in Special Case No. 01 of 2009 arising out of SPE/CBI ACB Patna RC No. 1 (A) of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to 2 the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)