I/mr C3)7 .K/ / '60 c{ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR §CHHATISGARH) w. P. N055Lg OF 200g TITIONER Nirmal Farm Machinery through its :B‘Kuin‘qh ‘ M“M3“ Panchmukhi Ravindra,S / o LateP.B.G.Rao,aged about R/o Pulgaon, G. E. Road, Durg, District Durg (C. G) VERSUS ESPONDENTS 1. Panchram BandeS/oArjun @ Shyam Ratan Bande, Satnami,R/ 0 Villags— Katul Bord, Durg, Tahsil 8n Distt. :'.w';jn4.:> V“ . " ' ' 2. District Consumer Forum, \ s 3. Chhattisgarh State Consumers Disputes Redressel Commission, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) x1 g‘w/wwgww( Durg (Chhatusgarh) . “Q . a"'K V‘ Durg District Durg (C.G.) fW" , ,,.. ., w“ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226[227 OF THE ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN ATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS ORDER OR ORDERS: ’ PE R W C N M WRIT PETITION No. 978 of2003 OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Am}i 0g} J. Present: Shri Amit Venna, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. O R D E R (Passed on 25d; day ofNovember, 201 1) . Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks pelmission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition. 2. It 1's ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. s ’ u f’ Sd/- ‘s Salish K Agnihotn' if i ‘/ 1 Amit @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR N W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIO Judge \. ‘J ; R PETITIONER Ninnal Farm Machinery. VERSUS RESPONDENTS Panchram Bande & Others.