ABA-447-11.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.447 OF 2011 Trilok Ramanand Singh ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru’ Khalapur Police Station, Raigad ... Respondent None for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP, for the Respondent. Mr. K.S. Patil for the First Informant. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 24 TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. : 1. The Applicant and his Advocate are absent. I have heard Mrs. Mane, the learned APP for the Respondent-State, and Mr. Patil, the learned Advocate for the First Informant. 2. I have gone through the Anticipatory Bail Application. 3. It appears that the Applicant, who is sought to be arrested in C.R. No.193 of 2010 registered at Khalapur Police Station, applied for anticipatory bail by making an application in the Court of Sessions. It appears that the Applicant did not get interim relief during the pendency of the said Application and has, therefore, ABA-447-11.sxw 2 Dixit approached this Court challenging the said order passed by the Sessions Court. The relief which has been sought in the present Application vide prayer clause (a) is that interim order of anticipatory bail be passed in favour of the Applicants in Miscellaneous Application No.369 of 2011 pending before the Sessions Judge, Alibag, Raigad. 4. Mr. Patil, the learned Advocate, who is present on behalf of the First Informant, states that, subsequently, the main application for anticipatory bail, that was filed before the Court of Sessions, has been withdrawn by the Applicant. 5. The present Anticipatory Bail Application is misconceived and not maintainable. The same is dismissed. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]