THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5760 of 2011 ORDER: Respondent No.4 filed O.S.No.152 of 1992 in the Court of the District Munsif, Hindupur against the vendor of the petitioner, by name A.R.Venkateswar Rao, Hindupur Municipality and two others for declaration of easementary rights to use an open space marked as “ABEF” as passage and for perpetual injunction against the defendants therein from interfering with his easementary rights. The suit was compromised between respondent No.4 on the one hand and the vendor of the petitioner on the other and in terms of compromise, a decree was passed on 21.09.1996. The right of respondent No.4 to use the passage was acknowledged. The petitioner initiated various proceedings before different authorities alleging that respondent No.4 made construction on a public place, contrary to the terms of compromise decree. He made representations, dated 29.03.2010 and 13.09.2010, to the Municipality, respondent No.2 herein. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. A perusal of the record placed before this Court by the petitioner discloses that his grievance was mainly as to the violation of terms of the compromise. Extensive reference was made to the decree in almost every proceedings. If the decree is violated by respondent No.4, it is for the authorities concerned to initiate proceedings before the same Court. On the other hand, if the petitioner feels that he cannot seek enforcement of the decree, he has to file a separate suit and establish his rights. The Municipality cannot be expected to take any steps when the matter is covered by a decree passed by the civil Court. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:13.04.2011. kdl