1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 11. CA/8984/2010 (RAJENDRA BABURAO SURYAWANSHI V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS) In RC/884/2010 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.B.K.Pawar, Adv., h/f Mr. A.B.Kale, Adv., for the applicant. Mrs. S.D.Shelke, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:8/10/2010 1. Heard. Since non compliance of office objections resulted in dismissal of the writ petition and in the exercise there is delay of 63 days, however, considering the reasons assigned by the learned Counsel, the delay is condoned. The order dt.11.2.2010 is recalled. The petitioner to deposit costs of Rs.2,000/­(Rs.two thousand) with the respondent State. Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE AGP/8984­10ca