\ / ^^.. '^s^^wSw^^^S^S&SS^ ^^••^^•^F-^^^^'f^'^y. IN THE HIGH COURT OF MftDHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR W. P. N0 , _ _^3__/1996 Pet.itioner: y ^espondents: Satram das s/o Goverdhan Das GeBQ€hiy R/G Budhwari Bazar^Bilaspur^Distt-Bilaspur(MP) V E R 3 U S 1) Union of India throughGeneral Manager^ South Eastern Railway^Gaxrden Heach^ Calcutta-43. 2)Estate Officer, South Eastern ^ailway^Bilaspur» Writ petition -Under ArtiCiale 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India* Petitioner above named begs to submits as under:^ XI-HC-22 3^- ^l^ld^, ^Tfi^4!?, f€l^l^y 3T^?T M5(ch. WNc<TT^<11ct)^^.,f?-..^.3j5j 7W 200 ^TI^T^T ^FTT^^TT^T $b^ll<=t) ^Rct ^ y 3TI^?T ?^[T^ ^f^T Ghl<4ld41rl ^IHdT^te^^^^ ^3Tf^T^RT 06-04-2005 None appears on Shri Vinay Harit, Sr.] counsel for the respondent^/ RaOways. Heard, Leanied counsel foil fairly submitted that fhe offhe petitioner, Advocate with Sixit Preeti Budhia the rcspondents/ RaUways vexy petitioner is occupying fhe shed No. 13 aUotted to him in Bia|dhwari Bazar area aad the Railway Adiniaistration has no imin^diate plEins ofevictuig fhe shop.it is fiirthcr stated that cveu|ofhcrwisc his righte as a licerisec are subject matter of aa^ther writ petition filed by him aloiigwifh. a large nuniber pendiag consideration of Budhwari Beusetr Vfinpeiri is disposed of at tihis stag< eventuaUly adses. of his fellow Ucensees, which is fhis Court as W.P.No,845/2001 <?s« Union ^fImSicL In vicw offhc statein€|nt/sub£aissioiiBiade, thls pctition 1 witli Uberty to file afiresh ia case Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (^^f^)