IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2007 / 5TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 133 of 2002() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.3300/1991 .................... APPELLANT: (PETITIONER) ------------------------------------- V.PURUSHOTHAMAN, OPERATOR GRADE III, TRANSFORMERS AND ELECTRICALS KERALA LTD., ANGAMALY P.O. BY ADV. SRI.A.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN (SR.) SMT.PRABHA R.MENON SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR RESPONDENTS: (RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 & 8 IN O.P) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE TRANSFORMERS AND ELECTRICALS KERALA LTD., ANGAMALY, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TELK, ANGAMALY. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. A.K.PAVITHRAN, O.G.III, CL.NO.1656, TRANSFORMERS & ELECTRICALS KERALA LTD., ANGAMALY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS SRI.M. PATHROSE MATHAI SRI.S.A. NAGENDRAN (SR) SRI.PREMJITH NAGENDRAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. =============================== W.A. NO. 133 OF 2002 ====================== Dated this the 26th day of June, 2007 J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. We find no error in the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge to be interfered with. Leave was granted to the petitioner on condition that the period of leave would not be reckoned for the purpose of seniority and other benefits. In such circumstances appeal lacks merits. Hence dismissed. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp