(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 871 OF 2009 Najbunnisa d/o. Hasankhan Pathan i.e. Wajbunnisa w/o. Syed Rehmatulla, Age : 48 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Aurangapur, Post Kurla, Taluka & District : Beed. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary of Women & Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Zilla Parishad, Beed, Through its Chief Executive Officer, R/o. Beed. 3. The Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Service Scheme Project, C/o. Panchayat Samiti Office, Beed. 4. The Head Master, Central Primary School, R/o. Kurla, Taluka & District : Beed. .. Respondents. .......................... (2) Mr. Milind M. Patil (Beedkar), Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. H.K. Munde, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr. S.K. Naikwade, Advocate, for respondent no.4. .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. It is the contention of the petitioner, that though the petitioner was duly qualified for being appointed as "Aanganwadi Karyakarti", she has been denied appointment. It is further contention of the petitioner, that the petitioner at the time of consideration, was S.S.C. failed and, as such, eligible to be appointed. 2. Mr. H.K. Munde, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 and 3, Zilla Parishad, submits that at the relevant time, qualification of the petitioner was only 7th Standard and, as such, she did not possess the necessary qualification. (3) 3. Mr. M.M. Patil (Beedkar), learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that now the petitioner has passed S.S.C. examination. 4. In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3, it is stated as under : " It is submitted that the petitioner can be considered after acquiring necessary qualification in future. " 5. In the light of the aforesaid statement made, on affidavit, by the respondent Zilla Parishad, and since the petitioner is now possessing the qualification, the respondent, Zilla Parishad, shall consider the case of the petitioner, taking into consideration her past service and her qualification, as and when vacancy arises. 6. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp871