^UKn1 8.B. : HON'BLEJUSTICESHmSATISHK.AGNIHQTRI WRIT PETITION < S ) No. 2509 of2007 : Radhey Shyam Sahu, S/o. Shri Halalkhor Sahu, aged about 50 yeara, Assistanf Teacher.Govt. Hr. Sec. School - Kuagondi, Block - Dondi, Distt. Durg(C.G.) -VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary Department ofEdueationi/Tribal Wetfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Direetor Publie Iiistruction Clihattisgarh Govt. Raipur. 3. Disti-ict Education Officei-, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Distt. Durg(C.G.) WMTPETmON.LWDER ARTICJ^EJ26;OrTHECONSTrTUTlQN:QFI]^^ Present: Shri A.S.Rajput, Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri Vinay Paiidey, Paael Lawyer for tlie State / respondents. (Passedon 24U1 dayofApril, 2007) . 1. The question oflaw involved hereia is asto whetherthe petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.ffhe date ofinitial appointment or from the date ofcompletion ofprobatioa period. 2. Leamed cpunsel appearing for fhe petitioners as well as for tiie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question oflaw involved infhe pr^sent writ petition are fhe sameas to that ofin W.P.(S) No. 4725/2006 (Amar Sai Ram & Others Vs. State ofCUiattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide orderdated 01.09.2006. €» In view ofthe abQve-stated submissions made bv leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same temis. No order as to costs. Aniit ISd/-,,ft,,;., SatishK<Agmliotri Judge