IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2941 of 2011(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ALEXANDER WELLINGTON , SWAN HOUSE, K.P.2/828, NALAMCHIRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEROORKADA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695005. 4. SHYAM AYINIPULLY, P.A.9435308, OCEAN TOURISM AND CARGO LTD, DUBAI, U.A.E 5. SISUPALAN.K, KASI, SRA NO.12, NALAMCHIRA PO,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695015. ADV. SRI.S.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR FOR R5 SRI.RAJU SEBASTIAN VADAKKEKKARA FOR R5 GOVT.PLEADER, SMT.CHARISHMA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT.15.2.2009 ISSUED BY H.H.SHEIKH AHAMED OBAID AL MAKTOUM EXT.P2: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DT.23.2.2009 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE CHEQUE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ADCB, AJMAN BRANCH. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE E-MAILS D.23.3.2009 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE LAWYERS NOTICE NO.0076/IN/2010 DT.14.2.2010. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE EMAILS DT.10.12.2010 AND 21.12.2010 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER'S LAWYER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P8: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.23.1.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P9: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.5.6.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.2941 OF 2011 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 5th respondent. We dispense with notice to the 4th respondent having regard to the nature of the directions being issued hereunder. 2. The Writ Petition contains certain averments touching certain transactions. We are not impressed to go into such matters. The quality of any relationship between R4 and R5 also need not be gone into here. Not only that, it is not within the jurisdiction of this Court to decide on any disputed questions of fact, which may ultimately revolve around the allegations and counter allegations. All that is required is that any complaint of threat to the life of the petitioner will be appropriately attended to by the competent police officer. Under such circumstances, leaving open all other issues, we W.P.(C) No.2941/2011 2 direct that R1 to R3 will ensure that any complaint of the petitioner regarding any threat to life will be appropriately taken care of, in accordance with law. Writ Petition ordered accordingly. (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps