1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 5045/2007 (Govind Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 18/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Panney Singh for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that co- accused Monu has been granted bail. It is further contended that it was co-accused Bharat Singh who inflicted sword injury. No sword has been recovered from the petitioner and no specific injury has been assigned to him. From the perusal of the statement of Sanjay, it appears that mainly the allegations are against co-accused Bharat Singh who was said to be armed with sword and inflicted injuries to the injured. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Govind Singh S/o Jai Singh Rajpoot be released on bail in FIR No. 243/07 P.S. Surajpol, district Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP