HiGi-i (:OHRT 9F CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ PetitEon £3: No. 2345 of 206g Peti‘tioner PL. Pandey! Sio. Late Shri Bhuwan La! Pandey, aged about 6S years, Retdv Professar, Rm. Ravi Nagar, Sindhi Co!any, Jarhab‘nata, Biiaspur (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department (1f Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawam Mantra¥ay3 Raipur {CG}. 2) Commissioner, Higher Education, Raipur (CG; 3) Governing Body!Managing Cammittee, CMD CQHege, Biiaspur (CG). 4) The Prindpai, DMD. PG Col§ege, Biiaspur (CG; Resgol‘itientS (Writ Petrtiorr under Artiste 226 of the Constitution cf india.) SE: i-ion’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihoiri, J. "Pié§“éh"%i'"“‘“§iziii?éigHd'ié"Tfiijét‘Hi‘beuEéei for the nerrtioner‘ I Shri Rajeev Shrivastavé, counsel for'thé roopondents No. 3 and 4. ORAL ORDER (Pasged on 3'“ day of Juiy; 2008) The petitioner, who was working on the post of Professor in C.M.D. Coiiege, Biiasouri has uled this petition for grant of benefit of ieave encashment on the ground that the employees of private coiieges are erititieo to get the benefit of leave encashment. 2) Learned oounsei appearing for the respondents No. 3 and 4 submits that the case of the petitioner shaii be considered in accordance with the ratio iaio down by the Hon‘bie Supreme Court in the matter of $taoe of Rajasthan & another Vs. Senior Higher Secondary schooi: Lachhmangarh.& others ( 2005 {1 0) SEC. 346), within a period of six weeks. 3} tn View of the above, nothing survives in the matter. ~ 4) The petition is acoordihgiy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sdl- ‘i Satori K. Agnihmyr i: Judge fail} i ¥ -r my; , ,