Cr.Misc. NO. M 3825 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 3825 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION 18.4.2009 Ayyub ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. RS Sihota,Sr.Advocate with Mr. BR Rana, Advocate. Mr. SS Goripuria, DAG, Hry Mr. RS Rai,Sr.Advocate with Mr.Gauttam Dutt, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of Mohd. Hanif that the petitioner along with others had inflicted injuries on the person of Khursid, resulting in his death. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that in the FIR, registered at the instance of Mohd. Hanif there was no specific portion of the body, which was hit by Ayyub with a lathi but improvements have been made by the complainant while appearing as PW 2 to specify the place of injury with a lathi. A reference has been made to the portion of examination where the said improvements have been made in the statement on oath in the court and the portion where the said improvement has been confronted to the complainant. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the statements of Mohd. Hanif (PW 2) as well as Yunnis (PW 3) and the FIR. The petitioner is alleged to have given a lathi blow on the person of Khurshid deceased. This fact prima facie stands corroborated with the Cr.Misc. NO. M 3825 of 2009 2 statement of Yunnis in his statement u/s 161 cr.P.C. as well as in the statement on oath. At this, it will not be appropriate to appreciate the evidence to determine the part attributed to the petitioner, as such learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage has made a prayer that he be permitted to withdraw the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. April 18 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE