IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11141 of 2009 Between: Dasari Bhaskara Rao, S/o. Chinthaiah, Bayyanagudem, Koyyalagudem Mandal West Godavari District .... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintending Engineer/Operation APEPDCL West Godavari, at Eluru 2 The Divisional Electrical Engineer/Operation, APEPDCL Nidadavole,West Godavari District 3 The Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation, APEPDCL Gopalapuram, West Godavari District ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly the one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his impugned Memo No.DEE/0/ NDD/ADM/JAO/C1/D.No.07-09 dated 31.1.2009 and to quash the same holding it as illegal, arbitrary, malafide unjust and against the principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in his services as Line Inspector, APEPDCL, Bayyanagudem, Koyyalagudem Mandal, West Godavari District, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER:- After making submissions for a while, when the attention of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner has been drawn to the fact that the order of suspension is an appealable order, so that the Appellate Authority will be in a better position to appreciate both the questions of fact and law involved in the matter, the learned counsel seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, leaving and preserving the liberty to pursue such effective alternative remedies as are available to him, including preferring an appeal to the Appellate Authority, so as to enable him to consider and deal with the contentions canvassed therein, on merits. Granting the said liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. __________________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.) 9th June, 2009. lmv/ksld