IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17271 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 11.11.2009 Urmila Devi and others ... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Ravindra Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioners, who are wife, sons and daughter of Govind Prasad, working under the UHBVNL and is now not traceable, have filed the instant petition for setting aside the order dated 7.9.2006 (Annexure P- 10), whereby claim of petitioner No.1 for family pension has been rejected on the ground that since prior to the receipt of the un-traced report of the employee from the police, his services were terminated, therefore, petitioner No.1 is not entitled for family pension. After arguing for some time, counsel states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the said termination order in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. November 11, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE