(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION [S] NO. 694/2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 151/1996. 1.Smt. Tarabai Shivram Kopul and others. VERSUS 1.Swaminath Malleshwar Kopul [since dead through lrs.] Ushabai S. Kopul and others. ________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 09, 2011 Heard Shri V.R. Choudhari, the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants. By the above Civil Application, the applicants/appellants seek condonation of delay of 23 days in filing the application for bringing the legal heirs of respondent no.2 on record. The reasons why the delay has occasioned are mentioned in the Civil Application. None appears for the legal heirs though served. Hence for the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, the same is allowed. Resultantly, the delay of 23 days in filing the application for bringing the legal heirs of deceased respondent no.2 on record stands condoned. (2) Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. ........... Civil Application (S) No. 696/2010. Heard Shri V.R. Choudhari, the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants. By the above Civil Application, the applicants/appellants seek to bring the legal heirs of the respondent no.2 on record whose names are mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the Civil Application. By an order passed today, the delay in filing the above application has already been condoned. None appears for the heirs though served. The Civil Application is, therefore, allowed. The learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants to amend the cause title of the Appeal so as to incorporate the names of the legal heirs. On such amendment being carried out, issue notice to the newly added respondents, returnable on 9th March, 2011. In addition to the Court service, the learned counsel for the applicants/appellants to serve the newly added respondents by RPAD, and file affidavit of service. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. (3) Civil Application (S) No. 695/2010. Heard Shri V.R. Choudhari, the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants. By the above Civil Application, the applicants/appellants seek setting aside abatement qua the respondent no.2. By an order passed today on Civil Application No.696/2010 the heirs of respondent no.2 are already ordered to be brought on record. Resultantly, the above Civil Application would have to be allowed. The abatement qua, the respondent no.2, therefore stands set aside. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Rgd