IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6458/2010 Laddu Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 13/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Atul Kumar Jain for accused petitioner Mr. Amit Poonia Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the accused petitioner is that the the prosecutrix went in `Naata' with Kajod amd thereafter some dispute arose between them, which resulted in lodging of false case against the accused petitioner and co- accused. Prosecutrix, in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. stated that her husband deserted her. Even otherwise, there is no allegation of rape against the present petitioner. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he along with co-accused Smt. Manbhar and Moolya helped the prosecutrix in arranging her `Naata' marriage. No interrogation etc. is to be made from the accused petitioner and no case was ever registered against him. Co-accused Smt. Manbhar and Moolya have already been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 8.7.2010 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6220/2010 Smt. Manbhar and Moolya Vs. State of Rajasthan. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail during trial. Resultantly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that petitioner Laddu Ram S/O Shri Chotu shall be released on bail in FIR No. 33/2010 of P.S. Purani Tonk, district Tonk on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 15000/-each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (Mohammad Rafiq), J. Thanvi