IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1145 of 2009 BIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH CHANDRA, S/o Late Sadhu Saran Yadav, R/o Mohalla-Punaichak near old post office, P.S.-Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Kiran Kumari @ Baubby, W/o Satya Prakash, R/o Village- Punaichak, P.S.-Shastri Nagar, District- Patna …….. Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 16-07-2010 Petitioner, who is facing accusation under diverse sections of the penal code including sections 498A and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, has assailed the order dated 18-06-2009 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge-II, Gaya in S.T. NO. 695/2009 whereby application filed under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been considered and rejected. While assailing the validity of the order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that going by the allegations no case under sections 307 and 498 A of the Indian Penal Code, is made out. Petitioner is a distant relative. The allegation made against petitioner appears to be super additions. He also made submissions with regard to claim of petitioner that he was not present at the place of occurrence. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 however, supports the order. It is 2 contended that entire mater has already been gone into by this court in Cr. Rev. No. 1445/08, which was filed by the wife of the petitioner. This court disposed of the said matter on19-03-2009. I have heard both sides. It appears that learned court below has considered the materials available on the record and has thereafter come to the conclusion that there is sufficient evidence available on record justifying framing of charge. This court does not find any illegality/infirmity in the order. The application is accordingly dismissed. Sujit (Kishore K.Mandal, J)