: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.596 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.754 OF 2004 Bank of Baroda ....Plaintiff V/s. Vinodkumar Chand, Prop.of M/s.Hallmark Computer ....Defendant Mr.Nitin Nikam for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD AUGUST, 2005. P.C. : 1. This is a usual bank suit to recover the amounts due under a demand promissory note executed by the Defendant for the value received. In fact the correspondence indicate that the claim in suit is admitted. 2. There is no affidavit in reply. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s notice of demand. There is no defence to the suit. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff undertakes to tender the compilation of the original documents within two weeks from today. The : 2 : documents if tendered, to be accepted by the office. 4. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgment is made absolute and the suit is decreed as prayed with costs. . Refund as per rules.