IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** FAO No.849 of 2007 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 06.04.2010 **** Hasan Basri and others . . . . Appellants VS. Suresh and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: None for the appellants. Mr.Gopal Mittal, advocate for respondent No.3. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) As per office report, learned counsel for the appellants has not filed fresh address of respondent No.4, therefore, notice could not be issued and notice issued to respondents No.1 & 2 have not been received back served or otherwise. This case is of year 2007. It is still at the stage of service due to the reason that neither the learned counsel for the appellant has provided correct address of respondent No.4 for the purpose of service nor he is available today. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 06.04.2010 JUDGE vivek