1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.263 OF 2007 Union of India .. Petitioner v/s. M/s. Hindustan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. and another .. Respondents Ms. N.V. Masurkar with Mr. P.A. Vyas for the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Sen i/by M/s. Federal & Rashmikant for the respondent No.1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2007 P.C. The scheme has been sanctioned for respondent No.1. The petitioner were aggrieved by the scheme and preferred an appeal. That appeal was dismissed on 22.6.2005 on the ground that there was no illegality and as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner applied for recall of the order. By the order dated 28.12.2005, that was dismissed. The petitioner aggrieved by that order had preferred the petition on 19th January, 2007. The petitioner has not taken any step for more than a year after dismissal of the appeal. There is not a single averment in the petition explaining the delay in filing the petition. 2 2. In our opinion, considering that, this is not a fit case for interference and more so, the scheme has already been sanctioned. With the above observation, petition disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (R.M. SAVANT, J.)