1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3835 OF 2010. Akola Chillies Company. -: VERSUS :- Mehamoodullah Habihullah, Chilly Trader. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2010. Heard Shri B.N. Mohta, learned Counsel for petitioner. The suit for money decree was rejected and Regular Civil Appeal was also dismissed. Thereafter its review was sought contending that certain material documents were not looked into. That review has been rejected on 20.07.2009. That rejection of review is questioned in present Writ Petition which is filed on 16.06.2010. Shri Mohta, learned Counsel contends that the Appellate Court has not considered the grounds for review on merits, and has only found that the review is not 2 maintainable. His effort is therefore to urge before this Court the failure of Trial Court as also the Appellate Court to consider the written notes of arguments placed before it by the petitioner/plaintiff. He has invited attention to paragraph no.15 of the impugned order to substantiate his contentions. The Reviewing Court has found that review under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. is not the remedy for correcting the erroneous decision. It has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court to conclude that there is no error apparent and it has also found that the filing of Second Appeal challenging the original judgment dated 14.09.2005 in Regular Civil Appeal No.153/2004 was the right remedy. I do not find anything wrong with the application of mind by the Appellate Court. There is no perversity or jurisdictional error. Petitioner ought to have filed Second Appeal in accordance with law. In view of this present Writ Petition is rejected. No costs. l JUDGE Rgd.