-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 241 OF 2010 Santosh Eknath Chavan. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. R. D. Suryawanshi for the petitioner. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 15, 2011. P. C. : 1. By the order dated 11th March 2004 passed in Complaint [ULP] No.465 of 1993, the respondent was directed to make the complainant- Petitioner herein permanent in employment with effect from 13-6-1991 and extent all the benefits of permanency to the complainant to which he is entitled under the law. This order was subsequently modified by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5341 of 2005 and the respondent was directed to grant permanency to the petitioner with effect from the date of filing of complaint, i.e., 13.12.1993. 2. Dr. Sanjeev Kamble, Dy. Director of Health Services, Mumbai Circle, Thane has filed affidavit. He has placed on record the letter dated 19th March 2011 of the Government of Maharashtra at annexure-I. He has also annexed at Annexure-II letter dated 1st srp -: 2 :- April 2011 of Dy. Director, Health Services, Mumbai Circle. By these letters the petitioner is given permanency in employment as per the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur as modified by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition. There appears to be some delay in implementing the orders of the Industrial court. However, Mr. Sanjeev Kambale in his affidavit has tendered an unconditional apology for such delay. Apology is accepted. 3. I find that the grievance of the petitioner does not survive in view of the fact that he has been given benefit of permanency as contemplated in the order of the Industrial Court which was modified by this Court. Hence, contempt petition is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)