Ewrzaz: ;w,“ asg‘ {m %ta WRIT PETITIGN (C ) No. qgga 0f 201 1 PETITIONER: /'Smt. Teja Kurre W/o Shri Artidas Kurre, aged about 42 years, Ex. Sarpanch, Gram Pancliayat Paraswani(k) R/ o Village Paraswani, P. S . Bhatapara (Rural), Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG) . IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i Versus RESPONDENTS: /1. The State of Chhattisgarh, ' through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Sub Divisional Officer (R)& ’ Prescribed ‘ Authority (Panchayat), Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT Si: CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR {Writ Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of india) ' Sing§e Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agni‘notri, J. Present :- shri Arvind Sinha, Advocate f0: the petitioner. § Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Generak for the State. ORDER £0RAL) (Passed on this 05‘“ day of Auust, 201 1) The petitioner §mpugns the order dateei 21.06.2011, whereby, on, account of non-presence eithe‘ petitioner in the preceedings, which was initiated against the petitioner for an aiieged embezzlement 0f the Panchayat funds. Learned couneei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to fiie response to the show-cause notice, which was issued vide order dated 19.10.2010. However! the warrant of arrest shouid be quashed, as the petitioner has faiied to appear on certain dates. 3. , Be that as it may! in a casewhere presence of petitioner is tequired, the petitioner must make herself avaiiabie on the date of hearing, as there are serious charges against the petitioner. if for want of presence, a warrant has been issued, the petitioner has iiberty to approach the authority concerned and make an appiication for oanceiiation of warrant on the grounds may be availabie to the petitioner for non-presence on the severai dates. in View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed with the above- stated iibenyi ‘ 5d/‘ ‘ g], Satish K. Agnihotri i i Judge Ashok WRIT PETET10N (C) NO 4350 OF 2011 // PETWONER Smt. Teja Kurre (y Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others