1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16150 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2054 OF 2010 Dr. Anuradha D/o Harikisan Loya .. APPLICANT VERSUS Dr. Tanaji J. Chavan & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R.F. Totla, advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for the State. Mr. N.B. Suryawanshi, advocate for respondent no. 3 and 4. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 2 nd DECEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1 This is an application for intervention. 2 The applicant has placed reliance on the Original Application no. 11/2009 before the learned Administrative Tribunal. The learned tribunal has kept the original application filed by the applicant pending in view of status- 2 quo granted by this court. 3 From perusal of the order passed by this court, it would appear that this court has only granted status-quo. Status-quo would only govern the party’s interest. This court has not stayed the effect and operation of the judgment passed by the learned tribunal. 4 In this view of the matter, we dispose of the intervention application by observing that the pendency of Writ Petition no. 2054/2010 would not be an impediment in the way of learned tribunal in proceeding further with the original application filed by the applicant. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb/office/ca16150.10.odt