IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3522 of 2010 1. MD. ARIF @ MD.ARIF MALLIK @ TUNU 2. SHAMIMA KHATOON @ KHALDA ARIF @ KHALIDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NIKHAT TABASSUM @ RUBI ----------- 2 29.01.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are husband and wife, seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Sections 498A and 406 of IPC. Petitioner no. 1 is brother-in-law of the complainant whereas petitioner no. 2 is wife of petitioner no. 1. Learned counsel, referring to Annexure-5, states that the husband of the complainant had already lodged a criminal case against his wife in which charge-sheet was submitted and cognizance has been taken. He next submits that petitioners live separately in Patna. It is next contended that the allegation against the petitioners is general and omnibus. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in connection with Nawadah Sadar Town P.S. case no. 444 of 2009 (arising out of Complaint 2 case no. 1264/09) subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )