1 oswp-1947-11 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1947 OF 2011 Hemant Makkar .. Petitioner Vs. R.D. National and W.A. Science College and ors. .. Respondents Ms. Rajni Sinha a/w Amarsinh Shinde i/by Legal Eye Associates for petitioner. Ms. Tanu Mehta Tiwari i/by Nivit Srivastava for respondent no.1. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DECEMBER 05, 2011. P.C. The petitioner’s limited prayer was for photostat copies of the answer-sheets to be supplied to him. The learned counsel for the respondent – college opposed the said prayer on the ground that so far as the junior college is concerned, it is the HSC Board which has to frame the Rules and not the respondent – University and, therefore, the guide-lines laid down by the University would not be applicable in this case. She also submitted that the respondent no.1-college is not against the verdict for 2 oswp-1947-11 supply of such photostat copies of the answer-sheets for the paper in Mathematics, if the court otherwise direct, or HSC Board frames the Rules for future. She placed before us the original copies of six answer-sheets of the petitioner’s son. We direct that one photostat copy of each of the six papers be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner immediately and contentions of the petitioner about the assignment paper in the second unit test as well as the theory paper in the first unit test are concerned, the learned counsel for the college submitted that in the theory paper of the first unit test, the petitioner’s son scored zero marks and in the assignment of second unit test, he did not submit the paper and, therefore, he could not be awarded any marks. These issues cannot be gone into by us. The petition is accordingly disposed off. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)