SRJ 1 wp-1387-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1387 OF 2010 Anandibai R. Sawant & Others ..Petitioners vs. Dadaso Pandurang Desai & Others ..Respondents Mr. Pratap Patil, for Petitioners. CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE :1st APRIL,2010 P.C.:- 1] The Petitioners are the Plaintiffs. A suit filed by the Petitioners have been partly decreed. An Appeal preferred by the Petitioner is pending before the District Court. The suit was decreed on 30 th October, 2003. The Petitioners preferred an appeal on 19 th January, 2004. When the Appeal came up for hearing on 26 th October, 2009, application was made by the present Petitioners for amendment of the Plaint. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. 2] Considering the stage at which the application was made, at this stage, no interference is called for in writ jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of India. The impugned order is capable of being SRJ 2 wp-1387-10.sxw challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioner against appellate decree, if the same be adverse to the Petitioner. 3] Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out for interference. Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J.)