IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28949 of 2010 1. ARVIND SINGH 2. RANJIT SINGH 3. MADHESHWAR SINGH 4. SATYENDRA SINGH ----------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 1.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is case and counter case. Theft no doubt may be ornamental. General and vague allegation of abuse in name of caste to humiliate may also be ignored but two of the petitioners namely petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are specifically alleged for abuse in name of caste to humiliate, not entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner nos. 1 and 2 namely Arvind Singh and Ranjit Singh is rejected. However, they are directed to surrender in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar (Aurangabad) in Khudwan P.S. Case No. 01 of 2010 and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order on the same day. So far petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are 2 concerned, their prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos. 3 and 4 namely Madheshwar Singh and Satyendra Singh shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar (Aurangabad) in Khudwan P.S. Case No. 01 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)