IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.14 of 2009 UNIT TRUST OF INDIA & ORS Versus SRI RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD ----------- 7. 20-Jul-09 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that name of the respondent is incorrect because during the pendency of the writ petition it was brought to the notice of the writ Court that by the gazette notification dated 20th April, 2002, the name of this respondent has been officially accepted as Ravi Verma in place of Ravi Shankar Prasad. Paragraph-2 of the judgment and order of the writ Court dated 4.12.2008 supports the aforesaid submission. Learned counsel for the appellants has no objection in correcting the name of the respondent from Ravi Shankar Prasad to Ravi Verma. In the facts of the case, let Ravi Verma be read in place of Ravi Shankar Prasad as name of respondent. To that extent the 2 cause title of order dated 01.07.2009 shall stand corrected. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Anjana Prakash,J.)