r: g C rg~ (QdG‘fl/i (D IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(5)No. £523 yé /2009 ETITIONERS // 1. Rafnakar- Singh, S/o LaTe Shr'i Raj Pr‘a’rap Singh, aged abou‘r 59 years, Upper Division Tgacher‘, Govt Middle School, Bur‘funga, Block — Khadgawa, Dish‘. - Koriya (6.6.) Smf. Samswa‘ri Thakuy/ D/o Lafe Shr'i N.P. Thakur, aged abou‘r 55 year's, Upper Division Teacher a‘r Govt High School, Chitfajhor', Block— Nor'fh Baikum‘hpur, Dis’r‘r. -Kor‘iya (C.6.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS /2 1. Sfm‘e of Chhaf‘risgar‘h Through :- The Secrefar‘y, School D.K.S. Education Deparfmen'r, Bhawan, Raipur‘ (C.G.) 2. Director of Public Insirucfions, Chha’rfisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Disfric’r Education Officer, Dis’rT.Koriya (Baikunfhpur) (C.G.) P R WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA‘ @ HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.6257 OF 2009 (Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinle Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. resent :- Shri A. S. Rajput, counsel forthe petitioners, P Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents‘ ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 04 day of November, 2009) With the consent of Ieamed counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard nnally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners» submits that the petitioners do not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, learned counsel submits that the case is squarely covered by order dated 248-1992 passed by the Madhya PradeshIState Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 53 Others Vs. sate of M.P. and Others). The said order passed by the Tribunal has been taken to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court was pleased to I confirm the order passed by the Tribunal by order dated 3-1-1 994 in S.L.P. " (C) No.6892/93. .Shri Rajput submits that the petitioners have made representation before the respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till date. 3) Shri Roy, learned Panel Lawyer for the State submits that the pending representation of the petitioners shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the date ofeceipt of a copy of this order. 4) ln view of foregoing, according to learned counsel for the petitioners lnothing‘fsurvives in the matter. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. However, this order shall be subject to verification of facts averred in the petition. , \_ Sd/- 2km SatishKAgdghmra 1 > ‘. Judge L Turnane r PETITIONERS Ratnakar Singh Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others