WPMB No. 484 of 2001 (Old No. 12045/2000) Hon. A.A. Desai, C.J. Hon. P.C. Verma, J. None for the petitioners though called twice. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. Stay order dtd. 6-3-2000 is hereby vacated. (P. C. Verma, J.) (A.A. Desai, C.J.) 23.07.2001 C.J.’s Court Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12045 of 2000 The Medical Practitioners Vs. The State of U.P. and Accociation, Jawalapur another another Hon’ble N.K. Mitra, C.J. Hon’ble O.P. Garg, J. Heard Sri Pramod Bhardwaj learned counsel for the petitioners which is an association of medical practitioner. A list of the members of the petitioners association has been brought on record. There are 80 members of the petitioner’s association. The association has challenged bye laws which has been framed under section 298(2) and 204 of the Nagar Palika Adhiniyam, 1916 by which the medical practitioners have been required to obtain licence on payment of certain charges. A number of petitions of the similar nature has been filed. Connect and list writ petition No. 40471 of 1999. In the meantime recovery against 80 members of the petitioner association whose name have given in the list filed alongwith. The supplementary affidavit shall remain stayed provided each one of the members deposits licence fee with respondent no. 2 by 31st March, 2000. If they do so the amount of licence fee shall be kept in separate account, by respondent no. 2. The respondent no. 2 shall invest the same in fixed term deposit in some nationalised Bank so that it may earn interest initially for a period of one year. This deposit shall be subject to the ultimate decision of this writ petition. In the event of failure of the petitioner to deposit the amount aforesaid, the recovery proceedings shall revive. (O.P. Garg, J.) (N.K. Mitra, C.J.) Dt. 6.3.2000 N.A.