IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5167 of 2010 GAURAB SHARMA, SON OF SRI SATYENDRA SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SABDALPUR, P.S. MAKHDUMPUR IN THE DISTRICT OF JEHANABAD. …………………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Mantu, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ------------ 3. 25.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code. This is a case in which a boy of 14 years was kidnapped for ransom and he has allegedly taken the name of this petitioner alongwith others in his statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that several other co-accused persons, namely, Rishi Bhushan Sharma, Guddu Kumar alias Lakesh , Gudul Kumar, Rinku Kumar alias Shekhar Kumar @ Doctor, - 2 - Mukesh Sharma alias Fatulia and Deepak Kumar alias Chandan, have already been granted bail by different orders of this Court as contained in Annexures-‘3’ series to the Supplementary affidavit. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 5.12.2007. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Gaurab Sharma, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the F.T.C.-III, Gaya in connection with S.T. No.165/09 arising out of Gaya Muffassil P.S. Case No.74 of 2007, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will make statement on affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take - 3 - steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)