HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1087 of 2011 Date : 25.03.2011 Between : Thatiparthi Ravi Raja Chakravarthi & another. …..Petitioners And Sapparam Sulochanamma. …..Respondent HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1087 of 2011 ORDER : This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed, aggrieved by the order, dated 02.02.2011, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudur, in I.A.No.484 of 2010 in O.S.No.400 of 2003. At the outset, it is to be noticed that the suit is of 2003, filed by the respondent for injunction simplcitor. After completion of evidence in the suit, the application in I.A.No.484 of 2010 was filed by the petitioners, seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features of the land and existence of shed in the suit schedule land. The said application was dismissed by the Court below. Hence, this revision. It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that for effective adjudication of the issues involved in the suit, appointment of Advocate-Commissioner is necessary. From the findings recorded by the Court below, it is clear that series of applications were filed by the petitioners, right from 2003 and the conduct of petitioners shows that they are trying to protract the litigation. Further, to gather evidence on behalf of parties, no Advocate-Commissioner can be appointed under Order 29 Rule 9 CPC. For the aforesaid reasons and for the reasons recorded by the Court below, I do not find any ground to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 25th March 2011 ajr