IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2039 of 2011 BHARAT YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he gave garasa blow on the head of the informant’s son as well as on the leg of the deceased. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner refers Para 65 of the case diary in which the injury report of informant’s son has been incorporated. It is contended by him that the head injury of the informant’s son has been found simple in nature and so far as the deceased is concerned, even if, it assumed that the petitioner gave garasa blow to the deceased, then also, the said blow was given on the leg of the deceased. Moreover, in course of post-mortem examination, no injury on the leg of the deceased was found. It is also pointed out by him that some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by this Court. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer submitting that there is specific allegation of giving garasa blow against the petitioner and the injured has received altogether six injuries and similar the position of the deceased. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 70 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )