1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.336 OF 2000 Ashokkumar Jain & co. ..Petitioners. V/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. and V.N.Mittal & Ors. ..Opponents. Mr.S.L.Kanuga for Mr.S.P.Kanuga i/b M/s.Kanuga & Kanuga for petitioners. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : MARCH 20, 2006. DATE : MARCH 20, 2006. DATE : MARCH 20, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. This contempt petition has been disposed of by order dated 24th November, 2000. Inspite of undertaking the advocate Mr. S.B.Jaisinghani & Mr. S.B.Samant have not filed Vakalatnama for the Respondent Nos.1,2 & 3 & 4 respectively. The matter was notified on 6th March, 2006 when no appearance was made for the petitioner. The advocate was given time to file Vakalatnama, failing which office was ordered to issue show cause notice as advocates Mr. Jaisinghani and Mr. Samant failed to file Vakalatnama. Office issued show cause notice which is sent to both the advocates on 14th March, 2006. Inspite of that, no steps are taken to file 2 Vakalatnama even till today. None appears even today. The only course open is to issue show cause notice against the Advocate Shri Jaisinghani & Shri Samant calling upon to show cause as to why this court should not proceed to initiate contempt action against them for not filing Vakalatnama inspite of undertaking given in that behalf as also of recommending case for initiating action for professional misconduct to the Bar Council of Maharashtra. 2. Notice be issued to the advocate Shri S.B.Jaisinghani and Shri Samant advocates on record for respondent Nos.1,2 & 3 & 4 respectively on the above terms returnable on 4th April, 2006.