C8) BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BIASPUR CHHATTISGARH Writ-Petition No.^SS^/'2003 /' Petitioner : Nan Singh Yadav, S/o late Shri P.S. Yadav, aged about57 years, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Jagargunda, District Dantewada(CG) Versus Respondents : \1. .-•* .s?<3'i ^t"^ Ns^A^ ..•.•''^sy*' ^"\1^- ^?^ ..^.^^••''" •^cy&^>"' T 'T*'^<A c> ^^ ^' z. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home (Police) D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (CG) The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Headquarters, Raipur (CG) y PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ 3 "'lgl^'l'f' .:'i ^•s:t '; 'i' :i Si!:-!-i,'li1 r .":;. i HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILA8PUR Sinj^e Bench: Hon'ble SIu-i Satish K. AgaUtotri, J. W.P. No. 2352 of 2003 Petitioner Respondents Versus Nan Singh Yadav State of Chhattisgarh Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Goverument Advocate for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (20th July, 2006| 1. Learaed counsel appearmg for tfae petitioner, subnuts that the petitioner has opted for Voluntary Retu-cinent by application dated 19.12.2002 (Aanexure P-1), stating that fhe petitioner be permitted to take retirement w.e.f. 31.3.2003. The State/respondents fafled to take any decision on the appUcation offhe petitioner tiB 31.3.2003, when tbe petitioner proceeded on retireinent 2. It is further subinitted that the petitioaer has been coinpulsoiy retircd by the Govenunent by order dated 4.12.2003 (Annexure P-4). AH the retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner, except payiaent of salary aad other benefits for fhe period from 31.3.2003 to 4.12.2003. Learaed counsel &r the petitioner confines his prayer, accordingly to permit the petitioner for maldng representation to the respondents/authorities iu respect ofpayment of salaiy and ofher benefits for the period froin 31.3.2003 to 4.12.2003. Leamed counsel appearfng for the respondents, does not dispute the fact as stated above. For fhe reasons stated above, the petition has becoine infi-uctuous, except the prayer in Para 7 (IV) for which the petitioaer wants to inake a representation to the respondents/authorities. The petitioner is accordiagly pennitted to inakc a representation to the respondents/authorities for grant of salaiy and other benefits for the period fiiom 31.3.2003 to 4.12.2003. In fhe event, such appUcation is inade fhe respoudents/aufhorities are directed to consider the appUcation on its own inerit, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks, fium the date of receipt of fhe representation. Accordiagly, the petition staads disposed of. No order as to costs. - Satish K. J^nihotri Judge &»"!