^ HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPinR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Writ Petitton No. 5921 of2005 Ram Pyare Yadav son of Kashi Chaudhari, aged about 57 years, Agriculture Development Qfficer, posAed at present at Cirde Salkanpur, Block Tirla, District Dhar (MP). \7ERSUS 1. State of Chliattisgarh tlirough the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, DKS Bhawan, Raipiir (CG). 2. The Director, Agricultiire Departmeiit, Indira Gandlii Krishi Vishwavidyalaya at Labhandi, Raipur (CG). 3. The Collector, Jashpur Nagar (CG). 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Agriculture, Jashpur Nagar (WKTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA) rSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnahotri,J.) Present : Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1, 3 and 4. ORALORDER (Passed on 15th ofFebruaiy, 2008) I- Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was employed by the then State of Madl^a Pradesh and was posted as Agricultiire Development Officer. Dimng the period from Augiist, 1990 to October^ 2002, the petitioner was posted within the territorial jurisdiction, which fell in the present State of Chhattisgarh. On allocation, the ser^ice of the petitioner was allocated to the State of Madhya Pradesh and accordmgly the petitioner joined the service in October, 2002 in the State ofMadhya Pradesh. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to payment of leave encashiiient, LTC, medical reimbursement bill, arrears of salary etc. for the period from 31.07.93 to 19.12.2002, which camiot be considered and decided m the preseiit writ petition filed in this Court. 3. Pursuant to MP. Reorgamzation A,ct, the State of Chliattisgarh can^ed out from the erstwhile State of Madhya Pradesh 011 01.11.2000, aiid L... ^Nir- 4. thereafter the serviees of the petitioner was allocated to the State of Madhya Pradesh, thus, the case ofthe petitioner camiot be considered at tliis point of time as the cause of action arose durmg existence of old State ofMadhya Pradesh and the petitioner is posted in the present State ofMadhya Pradesh. Thus, petition is not mamtainable on the yound oflack ofjurisdiction. Petition is aecordmgly dismissed. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge