: 1 : conp-5-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2010 IN APPEAL NO. 445 OF 2004 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 359 OF 2001 IN SUIT NO. 1144 OF 2000 Union of India .. Petitioners v/s. Indrajit Diwanchand Makad & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Mr. S. R. Rajguru for the petitioners Mr. V.N. Bodke with Ms. Madhu Hiraskar i/b Chitnis Vaithy & Co. for respondent nos. 1 to 7. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 26th NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel on both sides. Perused order dated 21st January, 2009 passed in Appeal No.445 of 2004 in Notice of Motion No. 359 of 2001 in Suit No.1144 of 2000. After hearing learned Counsel on both sides, it is clear that there was some misunderstanding on the part of the respondents in this petition as to what exactly they were required to furnish to the petitioners for the purposes of complying with the : 2 : conp-5-10=.sxw order dated 21st January,2009. Mr. Rajguru indicated to the respondents that respondents as per order dated 21st January, 2009 are required to submit accounts as observed in para 3 of the said order. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents upon instructions states that respondents shall comply with the order dated 21st January, 2009 within 6 weeks from today. The undertaking given by learned Counsel for the respondents is accepted. With this, contempt petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)