IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37114 of 2009 1. RAM ROOP YADAV S/O LATE FAKIR YADAV R/OVILL HAIDARPUR, P.S. PANDAUL, DISTT- MADHUBANI 2. MEENA DEVI W/O LATE SHIWA JEE MANDAL R/OVILL HAIDARPUR, P.S. PANDAUL, DISTT- MADHUBANI ……PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …….OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02. 11.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners have filed application for anticipatory bail for the offences under Section 498(A), 323, 341, 386, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant is the wife of co-accused Hari Chandra Jadav @ Harish Chandra Yadav. Allegations are specific against Hari Chandra Jadav @ Harish Chandra Yadav. So far as Meena Devi is concerned, she is alleged to have illicit relationship with husband of the complainant due to which the complainant has been ousted from her sasural. Counsel for the petitioners submits that cognizance has been taken only under Section 498(A) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fact that petitioner No. 1 is the old person and regarding petitioner No. 2 Meena Devi, as no cognizance has been taken under any other Section except under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code which can - 2 - not be enforced on her as she is not a family member, both the petitioner are allowed anticipatory bail. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their appearance before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond f Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 792 of 2008. Shageer (Mridula Mishra, J)