IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.396 of 2009 1. NAND KISHORE RAI, S/O- LATE BIBHUTI RAI 2. RAJESH KUMAR. S/O- NANDKISHOR RAI BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISHUNPUR, – ARRA, P.S. GORAUL, DISTRICT VAISHALI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.02.2009 Heard the parties. The Offence alleged is under Sections 363 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code Petitioners are the father and brother of the co-accused Manish Kumar who is alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that these petitioners have been implicated in this case falsely and on perusal of the statement of the victim girl under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it would appear that she married the co-accused Manish Kumar on her own. It is further submitted that during the trial of Manish Kumar vide Sessions Trial No. 359 of 2006, the informant of the case is deposed that his daughter (victim girl) has said that she had married with co-accused Manish Kumar on her own. It is further submitted that informant has also deposed that he has married his daughter at some different place. Considering the facts and circumstances, it is - 2 - directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur in connection with Kurhani P.S. Case No. 185 of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)