1 28-caw-901-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY srj CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.901 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1925 OF 2011 Claudio Joseph Rego & Another .. Applicants (Orig. Petitioners) V/s. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical Limited .. Respondent. Ms. Bhavana Mhatre, for the Applicants. Mr. R.N. Salgaonkar i/b. S.A. Salgaonkar & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATE : 20th APRIL, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 This application is preferred by Original Petitioner for re- calling the order dated 16th March, 2011 by which the Writ Petition was dismissed for default. 2 28-caw-901-11.sxw 3 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that because of personal difficulties, no one appears on behalf of Applicant when the matter was called out. 4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which read as under:- “ that the Order dated 16.3.2011 passed in Writ Petition No.1925 of 2011 be restored to file and be heard on merits.” 5 Civil Application disposed off accordingly. (K.K.TATED, J.)