S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 670/2009 Smt. Neetu Rathore Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of order : 16.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Mukesh Patodia for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The only grievance raised by the petitioner is that the petitioner applied for the post of Prabodhak and was called for interview and faced the same, but her result has not been declared so far. In my view, it would be appropriate to permit the petitioner to make a detailed representation ventilating her grievances to the respondent No.3 within a period of one week from today and if such a representation is made, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same utmost expeditiously preferably within one month therefrom. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 1329/09 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 670/2009 Smt. Neetu Rathore Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of order : 16.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Mukesh Patodia for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp