bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1848 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. D.K.Enterprises ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b.Mrs.Anamika Malhotra for appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry a/w. Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1902 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. CAM Enterprises ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1922 OF 2009 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Radheshyam Agarwal ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1933 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. F.E.Dinshaw Charities ..Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. 1. Delay in filing the above appeals is ranging from 29 days to 114 days. Admittedly, all these appeals are barred by limitation. No notices of motion are taken out. There is no prayer for condonation of delay. No sufficient cause is shown. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)