1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LG.) NO. 22 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 425 OF 2010 Devang Dinesh Parmar ...Petitioner Versus University of Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents The Petitioner, in person, present Mr. R.A. Rodrigues for Respondents No. 1 and 2 Mr. J.S. Chandnani for Respondent No.3. CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE: MARCH 26, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. 2. This Review Petition has been filed by the petitioner for review on the ground that the learned counsel for respondent No.1- University has made an incorrect statement while this Court disposed of the Writ Petition, which he contradicts by application for obtaining information from the respondent-University under the Right to 2 Information Act, 2005, when it is specifically stated that as per existing Ordinance, there is no provision to give provisional admission. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1- University has placed before us a Circular dated 11th June, 2009 issued to all the principals of colleges from the Dean, Faculty of Law. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 3. We do not think that this is a ground for seeking review. Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissed. J.N. PATEL, J. A.P. BHANGALE, J.