IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5273 of 2009 Anwar Karim Ansari, son of Late Molvi Abdur Rahim, Resident of Village-Chahunta, P.O. and P.S.Haspura, District-Aurangabad, at present residing at Flat No. 303/4093, Emarat al Aziz Apartment, Mohalla-Chitko- hra, P.O. Anisabad, P.S. Gardanibagh,District-Patna. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Joint Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department (Management) Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Superintendening Engineer, Tirhut Canal Division No. 1, Gandak Project, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources, Department (Vigilance) Bihar, Patna. 6. The Executive Engineer, Tirhut Canal Division No.1 Gandak Project, Muzaffarpur. 7. The Accountant General, Government of India,Bihar,Patna. 8. The Treasury Officer, Secretariat, Treasury,Sichai Bhawan, Patna. ……………………………………. Respondents. ----------- 2. 24. 04. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that for redressal of his grievance petitioner has earlier filed a representation before Respondent No. 1 dated 25. 6. 08, as contained in Annexure-3. However, the same remained unconsidered as yet. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner proposes to file a representation before Respondent No.1. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks along with certified copy of present order, the Respondent No.1 shall consider the same and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously - 2 - preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, in case representation is disposed in favour of the petitioner, the Respondent No. 1 shall simultaneously issue necessary order so that grievance of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be redressed of without delay in the light of the order passed on his representation. With the above observations/direction the writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)