IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6947 of 2009 DR.SHAILENDRA MISHRA, S/O SRI SITARAM MISHRA, R/O MOHALLA-NAYA BAZAR, SAHARSA, P.S.+DISTRICT-SAHARSA. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. BHUPENDRA NR.MANDAL UNIVERSITY THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR OF BHUPENDRA NARAYAN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. 2. VICE-CHANCELLOR, BHUPENDRA NARAYAN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. 3. REGISTRAR, BHUPENDRA NARAYAN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. 4. CHANCELLOR, BHUPENDRA NARAYAN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, MADHEPURA, RAJ BHAWAN, BIHAR. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4 18.08.2010 In this writ application petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 02.04.2009 passed by the Chancellor directing to place the matter of transfer of petitioner before the transfer committee for his transfer “from Purnea to any other college either at Saharsa or near to Saharsa except R.M.College, Saharsa where he was earlier posted.” It appears that earlier petitioner was transferred from college in Saharsa which was challenged before this Court in CWJC No. 5051 of 2008. This Court found that the petitioner had already represented the Chancellor against his transfer. Therefore, this Court disposed of the writ application by order dated 30.04.2008 with a request to 2 the Chancellor to expedite the disposal of petitioner’s representation. Pursuant to the said request of this Court, the Chancellor disposed of the representation, vide Annexure-9, with the aforesaid directions to the University. Thereafter, the petitioner was transferred to B.N.M.V. College, Sahugarh, Madhepura modifying the earlier posting of the petitioner at R.L. College, Madhavnagar, Purnea. The petitioner again represented. The matter was placed before the transfer committee. The transfer committee found that the Chancellor had directed the University to place the petitioner in Saharsa or near Saharsa. The present college i.e. B.N.M.V. College, Sahugarh, Madhepura is only 16 K.Ms from Saharsa. Therefore, the posting of the petitioner was in strict compliance to the orders of the Chancellor and representation of the petitioner was, therefore, rejected. Learned counsel for the respondents informs this Court that the petitioner has already joined at his transfer place. This Court does not find any error in the order passed by the University as the 3 same has been passed strictly in compliance to the orders of the Chancellor. After going through the orders of the Chancellor, this Court finds that the order is just and proper and in the facts and circumstances the Chancellor had rightly directed the University to place the petitioner in any college in Saharsa or near Saharsa. In the circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in the writ application and the same is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)