1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE: 09-03-2011 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.(MD).No.2754 of 2011 K.Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Seranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4.K.Vanamamalai 5.K.Sundara Selvi ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of s Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to dispose the petitioner's application dated 06.02.2011 and transfer the patta as per the deed of will in respect of the property in Survey No.516, Sub-Division Nos.3A2A2, 3B11c, 3B1A2 and 3B2B situated at Nanguneri South, Tirunelveli District within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :: Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For R.1 to 3 :: Mr.K.Balasubramanian Addl.Govt.Pleader For R.4&5 :: No appearance ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved against the inclusion of the third and the fourth respondents, namely, the son and daughter of the petitioner in the patta in question, by the Tahsildar. Added further, he has included those names without proper notice to the petitioner. The petitioner has already sent a representation dated 06.02.2011 to the District Revenue Officer, who is the appellate authority. As per https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 the Act, the petitioner is entitled to file an appeal to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli District. 2. Mr.K.Balasubramanian, learned Government Pleader would contend that instead of approaching the Revenue Divisional Officer, the petitioner has sent a representation to the District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District. Therefore, he would contend that the petitioner may be directed to send a representation to the Revenue Divisional Officer concerned to redress his grievance. Heard both sides. 3. As rightly contended by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the petitioner instead of filing an appeal to the Revenue Divisional Officer, he has sent a representation to the District Revenue Officer, who is the revisional authority. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to move the appellate authority, namely, the Revenue Divisional Officer concerned as against the order passed by the Tahsildar. With this observation, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Seranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 5756 ssm ssk/29.03.2011 /5c -2p/- W.P.(MD).No.2754 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/