IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 12.11.2010 C.R.No.5215 of 2010 (O&M) Yunish ...Petitioner Versus Fiyaz Ali Khan and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Devinder Sangwan, Advocate, for Mr. M.S.Tewatia, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by the learned trial Court on 07.08.2010, whereby an application for permission to lead evidence in rebuttal was declined. Two issues have been framed by the learned trial Court. The onus to prove such issues is on the plaintiff. Since, onus to prove of none of the issues is on the defendant, the plaintiff cannot be permitted to lead evidence in rebuttal. Such is the view taken by the Division Bench of this Court in a case reported as Surjit Singh and others Vs. Jagtar Singh and others, 2007 (1) RCR (Civil) 537. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial, which may warrant any interference by this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 12.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE