-^ . (^CA^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUBE AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. !3>^^S /2003 PETITIONER r^ / ^^'^' o^10^' A'.t A.R. Paigwar, son of Osman Julius Paigwar, aged about 37 years occupation Sub Engineer, Department of Public Works, Pendra Road Division, Resident of Ganga Vihar, Pendra Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) VER S U S RESPONDENTS 1. ^^'^"" •-•" r<p;A --* \€^" State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary, Department Public Works Mantralay, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Executive Engineer, Department of Public Works, Pendra Division, Pendra Road, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) The Sub Divisional officer, Department of Public Works, Sub Division Marwahi, distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /2^1 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 °3~^ T^WW^, ^Tll^Ko, !®|<y1W^< 3Tfi^T 1q^? SingSe BencfiiY^ oftheconstitutiohoflndia. ^eyv^ce - ^1^^' HI+1Cftl «)H|cb ^"fcTi^T^""'"""1q^"""'"^e .^..:£.....^SB , ^r—— "ff^ 200^ -^^^^V^-- 3?T^T'^T (^iw 3?1^T 5t»^w 1yRa 14,11.03 t' .-,- ^ ij. + ^H^T-'^<1T^R ^%a Shri Sanjay patel^ counsel for the petitioner. Shri praveen Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/ resoondenfcs, Hear<3 both the coiinsel Bythis wr.it petitionl undsr Article 226/227 of the| Constltution of India, the petltioner seeks to challeng< fche order dated 29,09,2003 |by whlch he has been transfejr [from pendra. Division, pendra |Road to Narayanpur Sub Divisi |Jagdalpur, The petitloner is ^ork ing a s Si.lb-Engineer, PWD ,j |since 07.02.96 at pendra pivision, pendra Road &nd he ^as transferred vide order pated 29.09,2003 frompendra pivision^ pendra Road to ^arayanpur Sub Division^ Jagdal.our. The contention <^t^t<!1<i)l ^W<vff'? f«Lc;l <P»1^1< ^3?rf^R3?^T W--3^^l^ / fetltic Pr9se[ irftt- «*•! ^'^ 'ed The^ dfawn-i n^'' on,., i-SCi oftey^^ prescnt-dl council f-3i onc2er;.t/!'jo! it n-^y be ^ ^—../.2i a-^^ ^c^- ..^-1 ~F ^ -{- ^TT^T^T f<^Jcb 3?TT^T SftHW <Mf^a f .1,' /-.^. 3?I^?T M3<cb ( ^cit^qeT) -y^r 3T?^?l ?^!T^R «^a of the petitiorier is tha^ order received by the petlitioner , he was already r el eived by order dated (} the petltioner ^ that tl^ and was oass^ln the back rQlxeved from the daty i4 ±s-sueS''lby the Electlon C^ •; -..^? ^••^^. ^. / ^Learned counsel fc|»r the petitioner sabmits that ^ •the'pe'titioner may be al^ resoondent No^l for whictl appearing on behalf of ti^e State/r espQndents has no objectiono Having heZird the and having regard to the case, the petitioner is ^ mentioning a 11 his griev4 ten days from today and 4 declde the r epresentatio4 of receiot of the same o of the petitioner in an ^ or der o oetifcion stands dis^osed Consecj-uen 11 y / M ^ (v 10205/2003 also stand c3i; par.ties are entit or der, eh{^?^141'1 "RPT^f ^* 'fe1^ if^^K ir^m^n^t before the actaal transfer 7ol0o2003, The grievance of iis transfer order is mala fide datCo The petitioner has been viiolation of the directions ^ '\~ 'nimlssion of Indiao ?'.-^^d owed to makei representation i] thQ learrAed panel Lawyer earned coansel for oarties facts aiid circamstances of the- llowed to make reoresentation nces to resoonaent ^.To.2 within ,n tuirn, res,oondent No.l shall within sixty days from the da'te >nsiderjlng all the grievances tojective manner with a reasoned With the above dirlections and observa.tions the" of. )P.No.3222/2003 and I o A. No : ^)osed ofo ed fcx .certified .coo^ GRPRJ[—FS/;^- 9 /2001—/,oo/o<?u Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge + <<- ^/