IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 990 of 2008 Mohar Shree & others ….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ….. Respondents Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the Sate. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the Sate. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner and, as such, the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer concerned against the present petitioners namely Mohar Shree, Mahaprakash and Pradeep @ Tillu. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. The police is likely to submit the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 11.12.2008 shall remain operative till the chargesheet is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 01.04.2009 LSR