CR No. 1520 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1520 of 2011 Date of Decision: 04.03.2011. M/s Ramrajya Clothing Private Limited .......Petitioner Vs. Employees State Insurance ......Respondents Corporation & others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed an application under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act 1948 challenging the demands made by respondents vide impugned letters. Vide impugned order dated 5.1.2011, the evidence of the petitioner was closed. Hence, the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Director Sudershan Kumar Lath has already tendered his affidavit before the trial court. The petitioner only wants to produce the director as its witness. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. Although, due opportunity had been granted to the CR No. 1520 of 2011 -2- petitioner to lead its evidence but the ends of justice require that one more opportunity be granted to the petitioner to enable him to examine its Director Sudershan Kumar Lath as a witness. In case, the petitioner is allowed to examine the said witness, the lis between the parties will be disposed of on merits. Moreover, the other side can be compensated with costs. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The trial court is directed to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to examine Sudershan Kumar Lath as a witness subject to payment of ` 5,000/- as costs. (SABINA) JUDGE March 04, 2011 Gurpreet