IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.A. No. 23‘93 (2005 APPELLANT] /Radhe Lal Sahu, #— PLAINTIFF aged about 60 years, S/O Late ShriPusau Sahu, Adopter Father Late Shri Sahadev Sahu, R/O — House No. 33/930 (Oid) 33/1047 (New) Guru Ghasidas Ward Near Railway Crossing, Telibandha, Raipur, Tehsil and District — Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS EFENDANTS ¥ /1. Shri aged Tarachand about Sahu, 34 years, 5/0 Late Shri Pyarilai Sahu, Shri Rikhiram “Sahu, aged about — 39 years, S/O Late Shri Pyarilal Sahu. ,Shri Laxminarayan Sahu, aged about — 27 years, S/O Late Shri Pyariial Sahu. Shri Ganeshram Sahu, aged about — 41 years, S/O Late Shri Pyarilai Sahu. Shri Jagdish Sahu, aged about — 44years, S/O Late Shri Pyarilal Sahu. Shri Daniram Sahu, aged about — 47 years, S/O Late Shri Pyariiai Sahu. (Ail are resident of Viliage Telibandha, Guru Ghasidas Ward, Near Raiiwav Crossing, Infront of Durga Mata Mandir, Raipur, Tehsil and Distljict ~ Raipur, Chhattisgarh, QL 7.§ Smt. Soni Bai, aged about /K — 34 vears, W/O Shri Budharuram Sahu, RIO — Sahupara, Near Panchavat Bhawan, Matagaon, Tehsil and District — Raipur, > Chhattisgarh. L ’ggg Biraji 65 years, Bai, W/o aged Late about— Shri Pvariia! Sahu. Sukhia Bai, aged about 65 years, W/O Late Shr‘l xii, Pyarila! Sahu, Sr. 8 & 9, RIO — Telibandha, Guru Ghasidas Ward, Near Raiiway Crossing, infront of Durga Mata Mandir, Raipur, Tehsi! and District I 1 e Raipur, Chhattisgarh. g Smt. Kamala Bai, aged about — 50 years, W/O Shri Vijav Kumar Sahu, R/O V§Hage - Sondongri, Post — Tendua, Tehsil & District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. L~1iggv Smt. about Kusum — 42 years, Bai, aged W/O Shri Lakhan Sahu, RIO — Village Khamtrai Ward No, 10, Tehsii & District — Raipur, Chhattisgarh, a«we Kumari Bai @ Khujji Bai, aged about — 39 years, , WIO Shri Dhanaram Sahu, RIO — Viiiage Talibandha Guru Ghasidas Ward Ambedkar Nagar, Tetisii & District — Raipur, Chhattisgarh, ~ M / ISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE ‘ cnDE 9F {EVIL :3R0CE130RE P / 13. Smt. Bhuneshwari Bai, aged about — 32 years, W/O Shri Samaru Ram Sahu, R/O Villége Sondongri, Post — Téndua, Tehsi! & District — Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Q» ‘ 14, Smt.( Phqieshwari Bai, ;fr aged about — 28 years, W/O Shri Raj Kumar Sahu, R/O ViHage Near Sarora-Sondongri, Post — Tendua, Tehsil & District — Raipur, Chhattisgarh. D 15f.” K Shri Kishore Keshwani, S/O —- Unknown, H.P.L.P. Gas Cylinder Transporting Contractor. Shri N.L. Sahu, S/O Unknown, Pooja Furniture. Shri Mohit Ram, S/O — Unknown, Ram Hair Cutting Saioon. (Ail are resident of Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh) K § - / 18X State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Collector, v Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,. XIuHC-22 x. 4: IT is evidah‘r Them“ m1 Affar‘ d husband and wife. 10332606 ’ Shri Kishore Bhadurii cc 5hri Amiyakan‘r Tiwarh r . Shri 6D Vwwam, 5w respandenf No.18.“ 1 Heard or: admission an injuncfion. Appeikmf fiied a sui‘r fa passession om (The‘gréuiqd ‘fha‘? aEso fiied an applica‘rion undg ,or gmnf 0f Temporary injunc “Hm daim 0f The appeHan'i'. ; aafh 0f Sahadam appziicm’r Hved WE‘hH Bigahin Bai. 5ui+ propar‘i’y is m passasgian of‘rr’es‘pom‘anfg N91 To 17. - In revmuz record 3mm of fhé: mme 0f respqmdem N94 .- 6km fhé suiT praper’w an The basis sr‘ded as owner of Thesui’f Brobar‘w nor r r I Es in possessiein of The same x sLzi‘r proper‘ry has been recarded m The ashram éahu. Respondenis are chimin of Wil! execu‘red by Bischir} 3d. > Naifhér annellan‘r is rec r r unseé far The appalla‘n‘i‘. ' :ounsel for‘respendems No.1 To 17. Iammem Adaocma for The 5mm i d M.(C.)?.No.347/2005 for fempdmry‘ r daciam‘fion, parmamerrr injunc‘i‘ion and he is adopfed Son of. }m‘e Emhadev. He r GrderiXXXIX Ruie 1 &, 2 of The'CPC ian‘ Respmqdems 1 ‘m' 1—4 and 17 denied 5ahadev 5ahu and Eisahin 8:15 were If he had ‘amy righ? aver The surf mew g XI—Hc—zz m pmpér‘i’y, his righfs are profec 0f Proéérj'h/ Aaf i882} Afprg IraspohdéMs No.1 'fo' 17 gnd éome . The name of bne of ‘E’he res:Pmad racord. Takimg im‘ro cons§d£mfior1 1%ese farc‘vs, m my opiniam, princigimd of irreparabie irijury ah‘d baidmce of cmvemgrme ‘daes no? find favour of The appeHw’r. 7 Laamed Trim caurT afier dué avalua‘réon of f’na ma‘i’arial avmlahie on racsrd r‘ighfly dismlissad The appiicgf’ion by ?he impugwd I ordgr da’rad 2E.12.2004 and h” ides m? ca” fw any inferféiéencfé by This Cougaf.‘ Thereforaa ‘i'ha app 2a! fiiéE hy ‘i’he aprgellam? is dismisa‘ed. summari iy. M.(C.)P.No.347/2OG§, L43 Nos.1iOi/2OC5 3x 6?Oi’200é smn‘ éisgesed of accprdimgy. . Sd/' padma Ed undgr Secfiom $2 of i'ha Trmmfer. :em‘, #15 properw i£uin possessiom of t of fhe proparw has baen ragcrded m l am's (raspwdem‘ N¢.1}) §n The revemue / Vijay Kumar Shrivastava} v 1 Judge ‘ d