IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14506 of 2011 Tauhid Ahmad S/O Rasid Ahmad Vill. Bara Bariyarpur, Ward No. 10, P.S.-Chhatauni, Distt. East Champaran. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari, East Champaran. 4. The Deputy Development Cmmissioner, East Champaran, Motihari. 5. The Block Development Officer, Motihari Sadar, East Champaran. 6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bara Bariyarpur, Distt. East Champaran. 7. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bara Bariyarpur, Distt. East Champaran. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 12.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Panchayat Raj Bara Bariyarpur in the district of East Champaran, Motihari prays for quashing memo No.1281 dated 23.06.2011 issued by Block Development Officer, Motihari directing him to deposit Rs. 1,57,126/- towards the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 171.91 quintals. The petitioner submits that he has either distributed or returned the balance rice to Panchayat Secretary of Panchayat Raj Bara Bariyarpur in the district of East Champaran, Motihari except 5 quintals of rice. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would deposit the entire value of 5 quintals of rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within five weeks from today. The petitioner would be entitled to file a detailed 2 representation disputing the quantity of rice that would remain with him. The authority concerned would dispose of the representation within two months thereafter. This court has not expressed any opinion regarding the quantity of rice that would remain undistributed as claimed by the rival parties. Till disposal of the representation, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)