142 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, C.J. AND HON'BLE SHRI D.R. DESHMUKH, J. WRIT PET1TION N0.6344 OF 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Vs. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ^ Kamla W/o. Thaleshwar Rajwar, Aged about 20 years, Caste Barber. Vidage Karwan, Present Address: C/o. Nanka Thakur, Village Karwan, Police Station Paratppur, Potice Out post Bhatgawan, Tehsil Surajpur, District Sarguja (C.G.) Thaleswar Rajwar, S/o. Devendan Devnandan, S/o. Not known Dapanhin W/o. Devnandan Chainsai Rajwar, S/o. Devnandan .All by caste 'Rajwar, Village Haripur, Police out post Bhatgawan, Sarguja (C.G.) Superintendent of Police, Sarguia at Ambikapur (C.G.) Human Right Commission, Stete of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. Present: Shri Pramod Verma, learned Addl. Advocate General with Shri Utkarsh Verma, iearned Dy. G.A. forthe State of Chhattisgarh. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, iearned counsel for respondent No.1. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24th July, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by D.R. Deshmukh, J. Heard. (2) Learned Addl. Advocate General has drawn our attention to the fact that Session Triai No.230 of 2003 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal &»^^ 143 -2-' t:... i/- v- Code in which petitioner Kamla was a witness has already resulted in acquittal and now after a considerable lapse of time it is merely an attempt of the petitioner to get the case reopened on the ground that before she testified in the trial Court she was actually abducted. It was also submitted by the learned Addl. Advocate General that after enquiry, it has been found that the allegations made by the petitioners herein in the letter petition fited in this Court do not have any substance. (2) In view of the aforesaid submission thereappears no necessity to take any further steps. (3) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^