IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 6761 of 2005 Between: Erri Rajeswara Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Salakpur Village, Maddur Mandal, Warangal Dist., ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Panchayat Wing), Warangal District, Warangal. 2 The District Panchayat Officer, Warangal, Warangal District. 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Warangal, Warangal District. 4 Sri Gudipe Danaiah, S/o. Veeraiah, Salakpur Village, Maddur Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the connected record from the respondents and issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the order passed by the Respondent No.1 in Proc. N.1759/2003/A2/A3-1, dt. 24-02-21005 reinstating the respondent No.4 as Sarpanch of the Village Salakpur, Maddur Mandal, Warnagal District as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and against the provisions of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act and be pleased to set aside the same and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KUMBAMSUDERSHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 6761 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed questioning the order of the first respondent dated 24-02-2005 directing reinstatement of the fourth respondent herein as Sarpanch of the Grama Panchayat. No interim orders were granted by this Court and the term of the fourth respondent as Sarpanch also stood expired. Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 28-11-2008 KLP