IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9000 of 2008 Between: Gorajala Adinarayan Swamy S/o.late Gorajala veeraswamy Naidu R/o.H.No.21-821, CCS Colony, 75, Doddipalli Post, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Assistant Director, Survey, Settlement and Land Records, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting the survey and fixing the boundaries of the petitioner's land despite making repreated representations, as being arbitrary, illegal and unreasonable and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries in terms of the representation made by the petitioner on 4.3.2008 in respect of the land in Survey No. 26/C situated at Mudasarlova village, visakhapatnam rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 9000 of 2008 Order: It is the case of the petitioner that he made a representation dated 04.03.2008 requesting the 2nd respondent, namely the Assistant Director of Survey, Settlement and Land Records, Visakhapatnam, to survey and demarcate his land situated in Survey No. 26/C of Mudasarlova village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Assistant Director of Survey, Settlement and Land Records, Visakhapatnam, is directed to consider the representation dated 04.03.2008, said to have been made by the petitioner for conducting survey and demarcation of the land in question, after issuing notices to all the necessary parties, and take necessary action in the matter in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 23.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr