IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.696 of 2005 DEOKI DEVI, Wife of late Binod Sao, Resident of Village-Naki (Lohchi), P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District-Munger. ……Petitioner Versus 1. MADAN MOHAN CHAUDHARY. 2. Ganga Chaudhary. Both are sons of late Devi Narayan Chaudhary and are resident of Village-Naki (Lohchi), P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District-Munger. 3. Raj Kumar Yadav, Son of Babu Lal Yadav. Resident of Village-Bikrampur, (lohchi), P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District Munger. 4. Ganga Sao 5. Radhey Sao. 6. Subodh Sao. All are sons of Hitlal Sao and are resident of Village -Naki (Lohchi), P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District-Munger. 7. Ashok Sao, Son of late Jamun Sao. 8. Bikash Sao, Son of Bindd Sao. Both are residents of Village-Naki (Lohchi), P.S. Haveli Kharagpur, District-Munger. 9. The State of Bihar. ……..Respondents ----------- 2/ 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to G.P.-8. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the validity of the order dated 01.09.2004 passed in Misc. Appeal No.5 of 2004 by learned District Judge, Munger dismissing the aforesaid appeal of the petitioner and affirming the order dated 17.02.2004 passed in Title Suit No.116 of 2003 by learned Sub-Judge 1st Munger, whereby the prayer for injunction made on behalf of the plaintiff-petitioner herein was rejected. 3. After having heard the parties, this Court finds that title suit was filed in the year 2003 and learned courts below after having recorded concurrent finding of facts rejected the prayer for injunction made on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it is difficult for this Court to take a different view, but interest of justice would be subserved, if the title suit filed by the petitioner itself is directed to be disposed of at an early date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his instructions, pleadings of the parties are complete and issues have been settled. Therefore, without going into merit of the validity or otherwise of the orders impugned, this Court directs the learned trial court to take up the suit of the petitioner on priority basis and endeavour should be made to dispose it of on its own merits at an earliest possible time, and it must be disposed of within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)