IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 466 OF 2009 SHRI. BUDO ENDO GAONKAR AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. SITA PANDU GAONKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Ms. Susan Linhares, Advocate for the Petitioners. Coram:- A.H.JOSHI, J. Date:- 30th July, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate Ms. Susan Linhares. Though this petition is strongly and persuasively argued, learned Advocate for the petitioners is not able to demonstrate as to how the petitioners are able to come out of finding that plaintiffs' claim being barred by Re-judicata. 2. On this sole ground, plaintiffs do not have prima facie good case nor balance of convenience in their favour. Impugned order is therefore seen correctly passed. 3. Therefore, petition has no merit and is dismissed. A.H.JOSHI, J. at*