IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3003 of 2006 MANOJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 11.5.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Opposite parties. The allegation is with regard to non-compliance of an interim order dated 11.7.2006 in CWJC No. 7376 of 2005. It is fairly acknowledged that the writ application came to be finally disposed on 28.3.2007 alongwith analogous cases. In the final order this Court noticed that no counter affidavit had been filed and in that background leave was sought for by the petitioner to file fresh representation to be disposed within a specified time with directions to pass a reasoned and speaking order on denial of the claim or any part of the claim. The interim order dated 11.7.2006 on which the contempt application is founded has merged with the final order dated 28.3.2007. If the petitioner is aggrieved by non-compliance of the order dated 28.3.2007, his remedies are different and constitute a different cause of action. The application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar - 2 -