IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8957 of 2009(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. T.U.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.UNNI, THARAYIL HOUSE, KALLUCHIRA, WEST KACHERIPPADY, KOCHI-6. 2. BONNEY RAPHAEL, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.RAPHAEL, PUNNANPURAKKAL HOUSE, 15/2312. PALLURITY, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.C.SAJITH SMT.T.J.MARIA GORETTI SMT.T.V.SHELJA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA. 2. R.D.O., FORTKOCHI. 3. M/S.P.C.JOSEPH & SONS TIMBER MILLS, POOPANA, PALLURUTHY, REP.BY P.J.JOSEPH, P.J.LASER. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.8957 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT The allegation in this writ petition is that the 3rd respondent has reclaimed and reduced into his possession 9 cents of property in survey Nos.1166 and 1435 of Rameswaram Village. Petitioner submits that Ext.P1 report of the Tahsildar and Ext.P3 report of the Village Officer confirms this position. The complaint in this writ petition is that though the matter is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent has not taken any action in pursuance to the report. If as stated by the petitioner the issue relating to the alleged reclamation of the Purambokku land is pending consideration of the 2nd respondent it is for the 2nd respondent to take action thereon. This obviously can only be done only with notice to the 3rd respondent also. WP(c).No.8957/09 /2/ Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action in this behalf with notice to the 3rd respondent. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.8957/09 /2/