IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W. P. (Cl Tfo.^S / 2006 Petitioner «.<•' .^."B ^ ^'y''- t^^y^ .-••' ,•-->•'! ^-' X'- ^Q^' .,,...• ':::•'•*" \ t.'.^-1''1'"' s-'-"' >:,rf>"^ <y"" ^.•r^y. C-)^" .t"^' ^y'"' Versus ^-"' Sunil Sultaniya, aged / about 43 years, son of Shri f ^cS'—Hari Ram Sultaniya resident of Dabhra, Kharsiya Road, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Respondents .co^ -A^0^lli^ ^.u- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, -^ through - the Collector, Raigarh 2. Municipal Council Kharsia, / through its C.M.O. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The Sub Divisional Officer , (Revenue), Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/22^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTERIORAI ETC OR ANY QTHER DIRECTIONS OR ORDER yb HIQH COTOtT OF CHHATnSGARH ; BILASPXm Writ Petition (Q No. 6366 of2006 Petitioner Suml Suttaxiya,- ayd. about 43 yeara, son of Shri Hari Ram Sultaaiya, icsidcnt of Dsibhra, Kharsiya Road, Ra^arh, Distt. Raigarh (CQ) Vcisus Respondents 1. State of CIlhattisgarh, fhrough fhc CoUector, Raigarh. Muiucipal Coiincil Kharsia, throu^i its C.M.O. Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) The Sub Divisional OfRcer (Revcnue), Kharsia, Distt. Rai^arh (C.G.) 2. 3. (Writ Petition under Article 226 offhe Constitution oflndie^ (SB: Honlate Shri Satteh K. Agnjhotri J.) Shri Amit Sharaia, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt Advocate for the respondente No. 1 aad 3. Shri B. D. Cruru, Advocate for the rcspondent No.2. ORDBRtorall (Passed on thls 3rd Juty, 2009) Heard. Learued couasel appcadag for fhe respondent No.2/Municipal Council Kharsia, on instructioiis, submite that at ptesent the laad in question is not required for any purpose of fhe CouacU. In future, if the laad ia questioa is required, the same shall be done in accordance with law, after affording prapcr opportunity ofhearmg to fhe petitioner. In view offhe above clear aad unambiguous submission xnade by learned counsel appearfng for the respondent No.2, according to leamed counsel appearfng for fhe petitioner, nothu^ survives in this writ petition for adjudication. The petition is accordingly, dfaposed of. No oider asto costs. ThAur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge