X x ‘ C IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR {CG} WRIT PETITION NO. lg (”4‘ I 2002 PETITION‘ER DINESH KUMAR SAHU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, ,S/O. SHRI PHOOLURAM SAHU, CAS‘TE—TELI, R/ O. VILLAGE~PANCHAYAT KHURSUNI‘ TAH AND ‘ BLOCK DEVELOPMENT—GUNDERDEHI, DISTT. . DURG (C.G.) VERSUS ROHIT KUMAR SAHU, S/O. SHRI CHHANULAL SAHU, AGED ABOUT 34 RESPONDENTS ) 1 B,;«~§§-$f ;.«‘;1’/éUNDERDEHL Mg YEARS, ND R/o. BLOCK VILLAGE DISTT. DURG. KHURSUNI, DEVELOPMENT TAH PRESIDING OFFIOER, POLLING BOOTH 'NO. ,6. VILLAGE~KHURSUNL TAH AND BLOCK GUNDERDEHI, DISTT. DURG (CG) ~ PRESIDING OFFICER, POLLING BOOTH "NO. 7 VILLAGE KHURSUNI, TAH AND BLOCK DEVELOPMENT—GUNDERDEHL DISTT. DUBG (CG) RETURNING OFFICER, (REVENUE) PATAN, HEAD QUARTER DURG, DISTT. DURG (CO) 5) SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PATA, DIST’I‘. DURG (CHHATTISG’ARH) /r‘ 7 OF THE " RIT’PETITION - . N UNDER I ARTICLES 226)22 / CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. Q < ‘ N ’ . (W /@ WW,WW,W. ' 5’.:..P.‘..H9.l..‘..l.§.[. ML W H1200 mm (W) WW§WW mmmm ' %aaTf—r?mm 09. 1 0.2006 Shri SP. Sahu. counsel for ”(ha n€titionen Shri Arun Sac) Govt. Advocats for 1~€snondent3 No. 2 to 5. None for resnondant N0. 1. V Heard. L€a111ed counssl for 1h€ netitionsr submits that bv affhxx of tinm. the Drassnt netirion 1i.as rendorad infructuous. thamfort‘, ho iS noi nressing this pctition. Th6 Dstition iS dismis 36d as; not Drassged 196mg infructuous. l _ Sdl- unil Kumar Sinha " Judge P.T.O. S