1 85 fa.1774.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1774 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. H.V.Mehta for the Appellants. Mr. R.N.Shah with Mr. Sanjay Udeshi i/b M/s. Sanjay Udeshi and Company for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26 th September, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Appellants. 2 The Appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 9 th March, 2010 passed by the learned Judge of the Employees’ State Insurance Court, Mumbai by which the application made by the Respondents under Section 75 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) has been allowed. By the impugned order, the order dated 9 th December, 1998 passed by the Appellant under Section 45-A of the said Act has been set aside. 2 85 fa.1774.11 3 After having perused the impugned judgment and order, I find that no substantial question of law arises. The finding of the learned trial Judge is based on the legal evidence on record. Hence, no case for interference is made out. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. [ A.S.OKA, J ]