IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 1353 of 2008 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 27.05.2009 The Haryana Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd., Panchkula .... PETITIONER Versus Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Haryana, Panchkula and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Loura, Advocate, for respondent No.3. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioner – Haryana Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd., Panchkula, which is a registered Society under the Haryana Co-operative Societies Act, 1984, has filed the instant petition for quashing the order dated 27.9.2006 (Annexure P-8), passed by the Additional Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Haryana. Vide the said order, the revision petition filed by Sahib Singh – respondent No.3 against the order dated 6.5.2004, passed by the Administrative Committee of the Board of Directors CWP No. 1353 of 2008 -2- has been allowed and the order of penalty dated 23.8.2002, passed by the Managing Director has been modified. Counsel for the petitioner submits that Shri S.P. Sharma was one of the members of the Administrative Committee, who decided the appeal filed by respondent No.3 and confirmed the penalty. The same officer has heard the revision filed by respondent No.3 and set aside the order of the Administrative Committee. This factual position has been conceded by learned counsel for the respondents. They also state that they have no objection if the order of the revisional authority is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Haryana, to decide the revision filed by Sahib Singh – respondent No.3, afresh in accordance with law. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 27.9.2006 (Annexure P-8) is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Haryana, to decide the revision filed by respondent No.3, afresh in accordance with law. Both the parties are directed to appear before the Registrar on July 15, 2009, who is further directed to decide the revision, after hearing both the parties, by passing a speaking order, within three months from the date of appearance of the parties before it. Petition is accordingly disposed of. May 27, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE