IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5875 of 2010 SINTU SINGH & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 19.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under sections 147, 379, 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant stated that he and the accused persons were coming to their house by Pune-Patna Train . Thereafter they all got down on Patna and boarded Danapur Sahebganj Intercity. It is alleged that petitioner no.1, Sintu Singh called 7-8 more boys and when the train started proceeding from Hatidah station, the accused persons along with their supporters ran away with the informant’s bag. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner had clean antecedent and submits that the instant case has been lodged on account of civil dispute between the parties and there was no reason that they should steal away the informant’s bag. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners no.2 and 3, namely, Raushan Kumar and Pintu Singh, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest/surrender - 2 - within six weeks from today, in connection with GRP Mokama P.S. Case No. 33 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Railways, Patna, subject to the condition laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. I am not inclined to grant bail in favour of petitioner no.1, namely, Sintu Singh. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. If he surrenders in the court below and seeks regular bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of on the same day, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J ) BTiwary/