-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.161 OF 2006 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2006 Shri.Pradeep Vishnu Puranik ..Applicant Vs. Smt.Sujata Pradeep Puranik ..Respondent Mr.Nitin P.Deshpande Advocate for applicant Mr.Vijay Patil Advocate for respondent CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 DATE : SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in our opinion, the following order will meet ends of justice;- (a) The applicant shall continue to pay the maintenance to his sons Kunal and Anuj till they start earning their own income as ordered by the -2- trial Court. (b) The applicant is directed to deposit sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rs. Ten lakhs only) in this Court. On such deposit being made, the Registrar General is directed to invest the said amount in a nationalised bank on usual terms. Six monthly interest accrued thereon, should be handed over to the 1st respondent and the 1st respondent shall deposit it in joint account which is opened in the name of applicant’s sons. Needless to say that the said amount of Rs.10,00,000/- will abide by the final orders which may be passed in the Family Court Appeal. Paragraph 6 of the operative part of the impugned order shall stand substituted by the above. (c) Four months’ time is granted to the applicant to deposit the said amount of Rs.10,00,000/-; (d) Civil application is disposed of in aforestated terms. [ SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.] -3- [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]