1 APPLN 5610 OF 2010 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5610 OF 2010. Yashwant Ramchandra Jadhav .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents. Mr. Nihar Ghag and Mr. Ranjit Deshmukh i/b R.R. Sonawane and Mr. M.B. Shirsat, for the Applicant. Mr. J. P. Kharge, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 23th December, 2010 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a Director of a Corporation which is registered in Nagpur and had duped people in Konkan area. The offence which is registered is in respect of misappropriation of Rs.1,04,000/-. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not at all involved in the misappropriation of any amount, but in order to show his bonafides, he would deposit Rs.10,000/- as he is one of the Directors of the Corporation. It is not clear as to why the applicant's custodial interrogation is required. In view of this, in the event of applicant's arrest in CR No.47 of 2008 registered at Devrukh Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, he be released on bail on his 2 APPLN 5610 OF 2010 furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions:- i) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- within a period of two weeks from today, before the learned trial Court which the learned Trial Court shall invest in the nationalized bank to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result of the trial. ii) If the applicant fails to deposit the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, the order shall stand revoked. iii) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by C. I. D. Pune on 30th December, 2010 at 10.00 a.m. and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; v) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. i) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with 3 APPLN 5610 OF 2010 the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)