‘ x ks ‘ W WW/A mm amw § IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAR!;LAI I}_ILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO HIJTQLQAQ WRITE PETITION UNDERIA’RTICLE 22$mQ-jij‘ljE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, _ K , Smt. Sheek) Khalkhw, aged about 49 years, wife of Shri Vecen‘l: Khalkho, occupatiQn »— A555t. Teacher, presently working m5 Head Master, Govt rlmary ochool -— Taraimar, Vlkas Khand Dharcunmqarh Dlst Ralgarh (C(J) ' EELITIONER ‘VERsus ‘ ‘ 1./ State'of'ChhatisgE.I|"I1, through — Secretary, Departmcml: of Tribal, Dau Kalyan-Singh Bhawan, Raipur /(c.G.) 2. Asst Commlssmnm Tribal Dlstt gG) / 3 s 3. Jomt Dmctor ( ury, A/c & /Pen5Ion), Brlaspur (CG) ’ . Block Educatmn (miter, Block ~Q,,, 4 y Dharamjargarh DML R—a-‘rrrandrgaeHRmgank (CG) Deptt o y " é @ l t t ’ , Tu l RE§9ONDENf§ f am.W (W) W31 V1200 mmm WW fs€TmR %w‘f%m$n%¥1 SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan 05-08-2010 Shri A. N‘ Bhakta, counsel fort Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel ‘La‘ advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel‘ appearing f petitioner is entitled to benef'rt of two she having passed B.Trl. examination cost. It is submitted that the issue i ionger res integra and the same has Supreme Court in the case of Asha 2009 (ill) MPJR (SC) 59. it is furthe taken a similar view in his ord W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned co attention of this Court to order dated No‘124 of 2009, wherein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) a another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, Shrivastava J. 1e petitioner. wer for the State/respondents on or the petitioner submits that the advance increments on account of before her appointment at her own lved in the present petition is no n finally decided by the Hon’ble Saxena vs. State of MP. & Ors., submitted that this Court has also r dated 06-02-2009 passed in nsel for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in' Writ Appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court d the order passed by this' Court in rections have been issued for ftwo advance increments as per he State of Madhya Pfadesh, after etition. ndents submits that case of the the same lines. i consideration of the case for grant circular dated 21-09-1974 issued by verification of the facts pleaded in the Learned counsel for the res petitioner would also be considered o , E§F§$fl3 —“FS/ l 47—2/20] 0 — 1 , 00 ,000. n o e WW W (W) @ tame M,,,d¢a \