CRM -M No. 32850 of 2009 Sanjiv Kumar and another vs. State of Punjab and another Present: Mr. R.K.Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Anter Singh Brar, Senior DAG, Punjab. *** Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral) This is a petition for quashing FIR No. 48 dated 25.04.2005, under Sections 498-A, 307, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur on the basis of a compromise stated to have been arrived at between the parties. An affidavit of complainant has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-2 wherein she has stated her no objection if the aforesaid FIR is quashed. Mr. Simran Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of respondent- complainant Sharda Devi and has confirmed the factum of compromise. Complainant is also present in Court and has admitted the contents of her affidavit Annexure P-2. It is pertinent to mention here that no injury attracting Section 307 IPC is made out against the petitioners as there is no medical evidence of poisoning. Learned Senior DAG has also confirmed this fact. Consequently, in view of the fact that the allegations are not very serious, and in view of the decision of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR(Crl) 1052, this compromise is accepted, the present petition is allowed and FIR No. 48 dated 25.04.2005, under Sections 498- A, 307, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kahnuwan, District Gurdaspur as also subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. This would, however, be subject to payment of Rs.20,000/- as costs to be deposited with the CRM -M No. 32850 of 2009 -2- State Legal Services Authority, Punjab by the complainant. Let the complainant produce the receipt of the payment of costs before the Trial Court on 02.02.2010 As the main petition has since been allowed, all the pending criminal miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE December 21, 2009 sunita