G IN THE HIGH COURT QFJUDICATUREAT BILASFUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^ /2U03 PETTTIONERS ! ^" ^ 'O 's^' -• ^^^- ^/./ ^•-^ ^ --—"^.,^ ^^•F^ :T»" ^> ''fr-.'^'s?-'^ ./ ^^^' ^~.,.».^-f ,~v>? y^\-^' 1, Ram Ratan Kashyap s/o Gokul, aged 55 years, r/o village-Kutighat, Block'Akaltara, P.S. Pamgaih, district Janjgir Champa (CG). 2. Nokhram s/o Chhotan, aged 48 years, n'o viilage- Kutighat, Block Akaltara,P.S. Pamgarh, district- Tanjgir Champa (C.G.). 3. Bhagwat Prasad Jaiswal s/o Bishambar Piasad, aged 42years. 4. Radhabai widow ofBishambar Prasad, aged 60 yea-rs. 5. Anant Ram s/o Amar Singh, aged 61 years. 6. Manglu Kewat s/o Ramlal, aged 55 years. 7. Ramayan Sahu s/o Baijnath Sahu, agsd31 ysars. S. Kanhaiya Sahu s/o Bitu, aged 65 ysars. 9. Namdeo sio Samaylal, aged 50 years. 10. Janakram s/o Gangaram, aged 65 years. 11. Guharam Jaiswal s/o Gangaram, age.d 55 years. 12. Daduram s,'o Ghasiram, aged 62 ysars. 13. Rajendra Jaiswal s/o Chamru Jaiswal, aged 30 years. 14. Phool Bai widow ofBalaram, aged65 years. 15. Shriram s/o Bhawaai, aged 70years. 16. Sukhbai w/o Sukhsagar, aged 30 years. 17. Chandra Bhan s/o Gajadhar, aged 30 years. 18. Shyam Sharan s/o Kasfairam, agsd48 yeais. 19. Leelaram s/o Bhagirathi, aged 55 years. 20. Chamarian widow ofAktiram, aged 65 years. (All iVo vill^e-Aarasmeta, Block Akaltara, P.S. Pamgarli, district Janjgir Champa<C.G.). -VERSUS- 1 .State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaty, Department ol'Revsaue, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur. 2.Coliector, Janjgir Champa. S.Superintendent ofPolice,Janjgir Champa. 4.Station House Officer, Police Station-Pamgarh, district, Janjgir-Champa. 5.8hri Kori, Sub tospsctor ofpolics, posted at police station-pamgarh, district Janjgir Champa. 6. Lafarge India Limited through its Managin^ Director,Gopal Nagar, Bilaspur. 7. The Sub Divisioaal Magistrate,Janjgir Champa. WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION/OF INDIA FO&JSSCANCE OF A SUITAB1E WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. !^ ?^-t^^;^'""'1'.^^^.fWgiS^^ XI-HC-22 .?"^[a-:! 5THW TfTf^. 'Kfi.-iS.^W^^,^S ^^yy^-^s.wy-y' swayssasss!r I, ^IRpre, 'feciTR3T /...<' liK't! S^Ni'h ^...'-?7.£/?3 an^r'^K'rt'TW?"'' WUV,<?H 'qp-T"ff ^ Is^t Tra^l\" ^? arfigir snt^i 20.02.. .2003 Shri Rajeev Shrivastav^. Counsel for the Petitioner. State by Shri Ranbir S^ngh Govt. Advocate. Heard. Shri Shrivastava subn^lts that wifhout there being any acquisition ofland and with^ut any payment ofcompensatton thereof, the mming operat^ons are beuig carried out by respondent no.6. The petit^oners further submit that they have made representation^ to' Sub-DMsional OfBcer and CoUector. Report was alsolgiven to the Superintendent of Police concemed as weU. Having heard and considered the facts and circumstances of the case, Inaterial on record it is directed that the petitioner may mejke representation afresh to the CoUector along with fhe peti^ion and copy ofthis order and on such an application belng givlng opportiinity of b flled, the Collector shall, after g to the other side, pass an -z [r^% sfwv XI-HC-22 'TSI'^li^lcKf, 'S^te'IS, 15RTO5< ^...^...AIA/. 'BE a:n^lq;l ^ 3JT^?I g?niq7^rft?[ •6. l.,<!—y .4w:^ysi 'XSS:t' +i<<I<'l41'l tITCRff ^ 'f^st <r«i«l< i; srfitTTT STR^I ~^S^ 5.[sysa^i^to5:^a.^ appropriate order in accordaiice with law^ In case, any adverse order is passed, the j appropriate proceedings. are entiUed to file With thls observation/Ube^ty aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of. Conseque^itly, I.A.No.1035, 1036 and M.W.P.No. 399 of 2003 also statid disposed of. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- Fakhriiddin Judse