C.W.P. No.20544 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20544 of 2009 Date of Decision: 07.01.2010 M/s Bhagat Ram Kanhiya Lal and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Present: Mr.R.M. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. To a claim by the petitioners, who were allottees in an Old Market that was subsequently denotified that they will be considered for priority in allotment when a New Market was constructed and notified, respondent Nos.2 and 3 have filed their short reply in which it is stated in para 5 that in view of the fact that 19 shops still remained unsold with the Market Committee, Jhajjar, a decision has been taken to consider the claim of the petitioners and all such other persons for allotment of shop plots on reserved price in terms of Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules, 2000. C.W.P. No.20544 of 2009 -2- Rules prescribe a particular procedure and it is stated that the petitioners have to apply for allotment in Form A of the Rules. 2. In view of the reply filed by the respondents conceding to the position of the claim of the petitioners could be considered and eligibility would be determined by the Allotment Committee as per the rules, I am of the view that no further direction need to be given except to state that the petitioners may apply for allotment in the manner contemplated under the relevant Rules. On such application filed by the petitioners and other persons, who may be lawfully entitled to allotment, the Allotment Committee shall consider the claims of the petitioners and issue suitable orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of applications in the relevant Forms. 3. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 07, 2010 Pankaj*