IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3094 of 2009 RAM CHANDRA TIYAR S/O KAILU TIYAR R/O VILLAGE- POTHIA, P.S.- BIHARA, DISTRICT- SAHARSA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16/03/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner is an accused of a case which has been registered under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant has alleged that the petitioner has raped her and on protest he has bitten on her chick, breast and etc. It appears from the earlier rejection order that the doctor has found corresponding injury of teeth bites on chick, breast and etc. of the informant. Submission is that though the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected twice by this court but there is no substantial progress in the trial. The petitioner has remained in custody since 7.3.2007. There is direct allegation against the petitioner that he has committed rape and the allegation has been corroborated during the medical examination of the informant. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected again. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer - 2 - for bail before the trial court if the informant does not support her case in course of evidence before the trial court. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)