( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 900 OF 2010 Biyani Mantri and Company, Jalna APPLICANT VERSUS Prateek Traders, Jalna RESPONDENT .... Mr. Satyajeet S. Bora, advocate for the applicant. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 1st September, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. Inspite of service, none appears for the respondent. 3. It appears from the impugned judgement that issuance of the cheques in question is not in dispute. The acquittal is rendered by the impugned order, for the reason that the respondent had no need to issue two (2) different cheques for the same liability. It is necessary to reconsider the relevant aspect as well as the question of the presumption available under the Negotiable Instruments Act. In this view of the matter, the application is allowed. Leave to appeal is granted. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln900-10 ( 2 )