IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.510 of 2006 1. SHYAM BABU PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SON OF SRI SATU MAHTO, R/V AABGARIA, P.S. MOHANPUR, DISTRICT PATNA, AT PRESENT WORKING AS ORDERLY, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA 2. MD. ISHTEYAQUE, SON OF MD. MUSTAQ, R/M PIRBAISH LANE, P.S. ALAMGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA, AT PRESENT WORKING AS DARKROOM ASSISTANT, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA 3. RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY, SON OF SRI BALLI CHAUDHARI, RESIDENT OF NEW AREA, JAKKANPUR, P.S. JAKKANPUR, DISTRICT PATNA AT PRESENT POSTED AS ASSISTANT PUMP-MAN, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA 4. MATHURA SHARMA, SON OF SRI BHAGIRATH SHARMA, R/V NADIAMA, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI, AT PRESENT POSTED AS CARPENTER HELPER, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA 5. SUBHASH MALAKAR, SON OF SRI AWADH BIHARI BHAGAT, R/V KARPI PURWARI MATHIR, P.S. KARPI, DISTRICT ARWAL, AT PRESENT WORKING AS PUMPMAN, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA 6. UMA SHANKER PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA PRASAD, R/V MANER TELPA, P.S. BIKRAM, DISTRICT PATNA, AT PRESENT WORKING AS LIFTMAN, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA 7. MADAN MISHRA, SON OF SRI MUKTESHWAR MISHRA, R/V UDHURA, P.S. DALLUPUR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR AT PRESENT WORKING AS LIFTMAN, I.G.I.M.S. PATNA. 8. RAMASHISH THAKUR, SON OF SRI FEKAN THAKUR, RESIDENT OF GEUTAMNAGAR, JANTA ROAD, PATNA, AT PRESENT POSTED AS HOSPITAL ATTENDANT, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA-------------PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DEEPAK KUMAR, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MEDICAL EDUCTION, FAMILY WELFARE AND INDEGENOUS MEDICINE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DR.(CAPT) DILIP YADAV, THE DIRECTOR, I.G.I.M.S., SHEIKHPURA, PATNA 4. DR. BANI HADDAR, THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, I.G.I.M.S., PATNA -------------OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 14. 1.4.2009 It appears in compliance of the orders of this Court passed in the connected writ application as also in the contempt application, the services of the various Class-IV employees of the Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna was considered by the Standing Committee and ten of them have been regularized under officer order dated 25.3.2009, Annexure-2 to the fifth supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 3 and 4. In the circumstances, this contempt application is disposed of with liberty to others that if they are not regularized subsequently then to ventilate their grievance before this Court. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J) - 2 -