IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4957 of 2004 BETWEEN Sri Tirumala Traders, Kurnool District. ... PETITIONER AND P. Seeenivasulu Setty. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. B. VENKAT RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: MR. K. RAJANNA The Court made the following: ORDER: This revision petition is at the instance of the decree holder, in O.S.No.201 of 1990, who sought execution of the decree in E.P.No.62 of 2002 against the respondent by seeking his arrest on account of his neglecting to pay the decretal amount. The executing Court had dismissed the EP under the impugned order dated 24.06.2004 on the ground that the decree holder must exhaust all other alternative modes before seeking arrest. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there were identical questions raised in CRP.No.5151 of 2004, which was allowed on 24.10.2006 by this Court by setting aside the impugned order of the executing Court and directing it to issue warrant of arrest and proceed in accordance with law. The said order in identical circumstances fully covers the present case as well. Learned counsel also points out another order of this Court in CRP.No.5031 of 2004 dated 31.10.2004, which was also allowed by reiterating the reasons in the order in CRP.No.5151 of 2004 dated 24.10.2006, referred to above. In view of the above, this civil revision petition is also allowed setting aside the impugned order. There shall be similar direction to the executing Court to issue a warrant of arrest of the respondent and proceed in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J September 28, 2011 DSK