THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1424 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 15.12.2009 passed in I.A.No.1047 of 2008 in O.S.No.246 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District. I.A.No.1047 of 2008 was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to localize the survey number of the schedule property and to note down the measurements and physical features of the schedule property. It is the case of the petitioner/plaintiff that localization of the survey number of the schedule property by appointing an Advocate Commissioner is very much essential for the purpose of his case. It is the case of the respondent/defendant that according to the petitioner/plaintiff, the property in Ex.A-1 sale deed and the suit schedule property is one and the same, and as such, there is no necessity for appointing an Advocate Commissioner. The Court below, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, observed that since the revenue authorities were examined and the relevant revenue records were also marked, the question of appointment of an Advocate Commissioner does not arise, and accordingly dismissed the I.A. by impugned order. Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and having perused the material on record, since the revenue authorities were examined and the relevant revenue records were marked, and since the Court below elaborately dealt with the matter, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order warranting interference by this Court with the impugned order. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J 30th April, 2010 GHN