^^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATnSfiARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227) N0 ^^ /2011 PETCTEONER/ Non-ADplicant No. 2 RESPONDENTS 9^:^ ^c^^- w > Non-ApDlicant Non-ADplicant Non-ApDlicant Non-Applicant Non-Applicant Smt. Deenki Bai, D/o Late Shri bashrath Ram, Caste- Korwa, R/o Purani Basti, Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.6.). VERSUS 1. Binda Lal, S/o Late Dani, aged about 22 years, Caste- Korwa, R/o Village—Rani Road, Purani Basti, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) Amicus curiae - his mother Rajmati Wd/o Late Dani, caste - Korwa, aged about years, R/o Vitlage - Rani' Road, Purani Basti, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.6.) (died) (Applicant) 2. General Public 3. Pdnch Ram (dead) omitted his legal reprehensive (a) Sukwara Bai, Wd/o Late Pancharam, aged about 65 years. (b) Firturam, S/o Late Panchram, aged about 45 years. (c) Firtram, S/o Late Pancharam aged about 40 years. ^|lB1^®BiiN'^w*UUA!riiilau<*^"luu^^ Non-Applicant (d) Chhote Lal, S/o Late Panchram, aged about 35 years. All are residents of Village Aanchhimar, Korba, Tahsil and Distt.- Korba (C.6.) WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTCCLE 227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA. r .1^ pS(i-in:F: •Si^'V.l.^x'-f HIGH COTJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BHASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 2095 of 2011 PBTITIONER RB8PONDBNT8 Smt. DeenM Bai VBRSU8 Btnda Lal & others (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA1 (SB: Hon'ble Mr. N,K.Ai®CTirol,J.l Present : Shri Pushpendra Patel, Advpcate for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed oa 21.04.2011) 1. Heard on admission. 2. The instant petition, filed under Article 227 of tlie Constitation of India, calls in question tfae legalily and propriety oforder dated 17.03.2011, passed by the Ist Ciffil Judge, Class I, Korba, in Succession Case No. 08/95, whereby fhe petitioner's prayer for adjoumment was rejected by fhe trial court. 3. Brief facts of the case are fhafc Succession Case was filed by the respondent Bmda Lal in fhe year 1995 and since fhen the case was pending. Despite several opportunities granted, the petitioner failed to adduce evidence, and therefore trial court dismissed fhe prayer made by the petitioner for adjoumment. 4. I have heard the counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order uupugned. !Si!ii»Si Sabu 5. Lookmg to the fact that succession matter was pending since 1995 and contesting defendant have already adduced their evidence, in the considered oplnion of fhis coiirt, the trial court has not coinmitted any fflegality in rejecting the petitioner's applicatton for adjoumment warranting interference of fhis court under Article 227 of the Constitution oflndia. 6. It is Well settied principle of law that this Coiirt, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, should relrain itself from interfering with fhe order passed by the Court below, except in such cases where perversity, UIegality, Irregularity or jurisdictional error is writ large on the face of the record, which is not ui the present case. 7. The petition has no merit and fhe same is accordingly dismissed. No order asto costs. -—" Sd//- N.K. Agrawal Judge