IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32311 of 2011(L) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHOBITHA , D/O.SHAJAHAN, FIRDOUSE MANZIL, MAHATMA NAGAR PALLIMUKKU, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN SMT.R.S.SREEVIDYA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER,KOLLAM KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 001. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION,KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 011 3. SALIM ,S/O. ABDUL RAZAK INCHAKKAL HOUSE, PALLIMUKKU KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 001. 4. SALIM, MANAGER OF 3RD RESPONDENT INCHAKKAL HOUSE, PALLIMUKKU KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 001. 5. PRAKASH, AUTORIKSHA DRIVER GOPALASSERY VADAKKEVILA, KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 010. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 32311 of 2011(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1:- A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF the PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE TH 1ST RESPONDENT DT.23/11/11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.32311 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose The petitioner, a lady complains that respondent Nos.3 to 5 her neighbours are threatening her and members of her family with danger to lives and limbs. According to the petitioner, the party respondents are antagonized with her as the petitioner purchased a property upon which the party respondents were having an eye. Every now and then, the party respondents are coming over near to the petitioner's residential house and creating difficulties for the petitioner. The petitioner is living under constant fear on account of the respondents. 2. Sri.Dhanesh Mathew Manjooran, the learned Government Pleader has taken notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. Having considered the averments in the Writ Petition, the various materials placed on record and W. P. C. No.32311 of 2011 -2- the submissions addressed before us by Sri.C.Rajendran, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Dhanesh Mathew Manjooran, the learned Government Pleader, we feel that in the nature of the relief which we are granting to the petitioner, the same can be granted and the Writ Petition itself can be disposed of even without notice to the party respondents. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at this stage itself in the following terms:- The 2nd respondent before whom a copy of Ext.P1 is submitted will treat the above copy as the original itself and conduct a detailed enquiry into the same. As part of the enquiry the 2nd respondent can summon or meet respondents 3 to 5. If the enquiry reveals that there is truth in the allegations of the petitioner that there is subsisting threat to the peaceful life of the petitioner and members of her family from respondents 3 to 5, 2nd respondent shall take requisite steps by ensuring that the lives and limbs of the petitioner and members of the family are safe and also that W. P. C. No.32311 of 2011 -3- petitioner and members of her family are able to reside peacefully in their residential house. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE Sd/- K. HARILAL JUDGE kns/- //True Copy// P. A. TO JUDGE