THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Contempt Case No.267 of 2011 Dated 20th June, 2011 Between: M.Krishnaiah Goud and another …Petitioners And M.A.Mannam, Panchayat Secretary, Kollapur Gram Panchayat, Kollapur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri L.V.S.Nagaraju Counsel for respondents: Sri P.Raghavender Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of order, dated 22.02.2011, in W.P.No.4263 of 2011. By the aforementioned order, this Court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the stalls in their occupation. It was also directed that respondent Nos.4 and 5 shall indicate the alternative proposals for rehabilitation of the petitioners and other similarly situated persons, who prima facie appear to be in occupation of their respective stalls for a long time. The petitioners pleaded that the respondents have demolished their shops with bulldozers on 22.02.2011 in spite of their showing the order of this Court. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent Nos.3 and 4, it is inter alia stated that the bunks belonging to the petitioners and others were demolished with their consent only after allotment of alternative sites and that therefore the order of this Court was not violated. As no proceedings in writing were issued allotting the alternative sites, Sri P.Raghavender Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, has taken adjournment on 06.06.2011 to enable the respondents to issue formal proceedings for this purpose. Today, when the case is taken up, the learned Standing Counsel placed before the Court resolution, dated 09.06.2011, of the Gram Panchayat, wherein it has resolved to allot alternative sites to 22 persons, including the petitioners, for running their respective petty businesses. A copy of the resolution is served on the learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of the above events, I am of the opinion that the petitioners cannot have legitimate grievance with the allotment of alternative sites. In the event the sites allotted in pursuance of the above noted resolution are not handed over to the petitioners, they shall be free to seek revival of this contempt case. Subject to the observations made hereinabove, the contempt case is closed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th June, 2011 VGB