THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5459 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 04.11.2011 in C.M.A.No.15 of 2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, whereunder and whereby, the order and decree dated 08.09.2011 in I.A.No.138 of 2010 in O.S.No.24 of 2010 were set aside and temporary injunction was granted restraining the respondents and their men from interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment over the schedule property till disposal of the suit. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The trial Court upon considering the material on record dismissed I.A.No.138 of 2010 in O.S.No.24 of 2010 filed by the plaintiffs for grant of temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. On appeal the first appellate Court granted injunction in favour of the plaintiffs. 4. Grant or refusal of injunction is guided by three well established principles viz., 1) prima facie case, 2) balance of convenience and 3) irreparable injury if injunction is not granted. 5. So far as prima facie case is concerned, the respondents herein /plaintiffs claimed that their grand father purchased the property to an extent of Ac. 0.03 ¾ cents under a registered sale deed. Whereas the case of the petitioners herein /defendants is that the father of the respondents sold Ac. 0.03 cents in favour of the maternal uncle of the petitioners and they claim that it is their ancestral property. Therefore, at this stage, the prima facie title cannot be gone into in view of rival claims made by both the parties. 6. With regard to possession, the petitioners did not file any document to show that they are in possession over the property. Similarly, the respondents herein also not filed any document except the certificates issued by the Village Assistant to show about their possession. It is not in dispute before this Court that the plaint schedule property is a vacant site, which has to be preserved till disposal of the suit so that the right, title and interest of the parties can be decided after adducing necessary evidence in the suit. 7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Both parties are directed to maintain status-quo till disposal of the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J DECEMBER 28, 2011. YVL IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5459 OF 2011 Between : Bandaru Narasimhulu and others. ... PETITIONERS A N D Gandu Sreenivasulu and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5459 OF 2011 28.12.2011 YVL