IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2009 / 1ST SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 3563 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): 1. SRI.HUSSAIN, S/O.MUHAMMED HAJI, AGED 40 YEARS, MANKADA HOUSE, THANNALA VILLAGE, THENNALA KARA,THIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MOIDEENKUTTY HAJI,S/O.MOHAMMED HAJI, AGED 73 YRS,MANKADA HOUSE, THENNALA VILLAGE, THENNALA KARA, THIRURANGADI TALUK. 3. JAMSEEL,D/I,.MOHAMMED HAJI,AGED 21 YRS,M ANKADA HOUSE, THENNALA VILLAGE, THENNALA KARA, THIRURANGADI TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL) SRI.T.V.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRURANGADI. 4. MANKADA ETHEENKUTTY, S/O.KOYAKUTTY HAJI, MANKADA HOUSE, THENNALA KARA, THENMALA VILLAGE, THIRURANGADI. 5. MOHAMMED, S/O.ENTHEENEKUTTY, MANKADA HOUSE, THENNALA KARA, THENNALA VILLAGE, THIRURANGADI. 6. MOOTAPARABAN KUNJU MOIDEEN, S/O.KUNJUTTY HAJI, MOOTAPARAMBAN HOUSE, THENNALA KARA, TIRURANGADI TALUK. 7. MOOTAPARAMBAN SAMAD, S/O. HASSAN, MOOTAPARAMBAN SAMAD, S/O.HASSAN, MOOTAPARAMBAN HOUSE, THENNALA KARA, TIRURANGADI TALUK. ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO 7 SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL FOR R4 TO 7 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 3563 OF 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF FIR CUM FI STATEMENT DT.28.12.2008 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF FIR CUM FI STATEMENT DT.21.1.2009 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF INTERIM INJUNCTION ORDER IN IA 2224/08 PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF COURT DT.5.12.2008 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.9.1.2009 PREFERRED BEFORE R3 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECIEPT FO COMPLAINT BEFORE R3 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT.23.1.2009 BEFORE R2 EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.3.2.2009 IN WPC 3563/09 EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF COVERING LETTER DT.5.2.2009 SERVED ON R3 EXT.P9 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.65/009 DT.6.2.2009 EXT.P10TRUE COPY OF OP TICKET ISSUED TO SULAIMAN EXT.P11TRUE COPY OF OP TICKET ISSUED TO SAMEER EXT.P12TRUE COPY OF OP TICKET ISSUED TO ABDUL SALAM EXT.P13TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT.6.2.2009 SUBMITTED BEFORE SI OF POLICE EXT.P14 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME 66/09 DT.6.2.2009 EXT.P15TRUE COPY OF PHOTOPRINT SHOWING THE PRESENT LIE OF THE ENTRY TO THE PETITIONER'S HOUSE EXT.P16TRUE COPY OF THE DISMISSAL ORDER DT.4.4.09 IN IA 317/09 IN OS 47/09 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR EXT.P17TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER DT.29.6.09 IN IA 518/09 IN CMA NO.10/09 OF DISTRICT COURT, MANJERI EXT.P18TRUE COPY OF PETITION DT.1.7.09 BEFORE SI OF POLICE, TIRURANGADI EXT.P19TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DT.2.7.2009 ISSUED BY SI OF POLICE, TIRURANGADI TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------- WP(C) NO.3563 OF 2009-Y -------------------------------------------------------- Dated 23rd July 2009 Judgment RAMAN, J. A detailed order was passed by this court in this Writ Petition on 6.2.2009. The said order is still continuing in force. After hearing the parties, we find that the dispute is regarding a pathway. This court, by the above said order, has made it clear that the property belonging to a private party without acquiring the same, cannot be used as a pathway and it is also directed that the property should be restored to its original position. 2. In so far as the situation has not been peaceful, it is necessary to continue the order of police protection to maintain law and order. We do so. If there is any dispute regarding the pathway, it is open to either of the parties to approach the civil court. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sta WPC 3563/09 2 WPC 3563/09 3