Crl.M.C No.2066/2008 Page 1 of 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C No.2066/2008 % Date of Decision : 04.07.2008 Sher Singh & Others ….… Petitioners Through: Mr.Vikas Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner along with petitioner No.1 in person. Versus State & Another ......... Respondents Through : Mr.Amit Sharma, APP for the State along with complainant Smt.Usha in person. SI Shri Rajender Singh, IO is present. CORAM :- * HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. * I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. It is disclosed that respondent No.2 has settled her disputes with the petitioner No.1, her husband, and other family members of the petitioner No.1. Pursuant to the settlement between the petitioner No.1 Crl.M.C No.2066/2008 Page 2 of 3 and respondent No.2, husband and wife, the maintenance has been paid to the respondent No.2 and she has also got money in the form of fixed deposit in the name of her daughter. The application for maintenance filed by the petitioner under Section 125 of the Code of Civil Procedure has also been settled. The respondent No.2 and the petitioner No.1 has also agreed that the daughter from the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 will stay with the respondent No.2. In the circumstances, respondent no.2 does not wish to continue the proceedings pursuant to FIR No.200/2006 registered at Police Station Anand Vihar under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and she seeks that the same be quashed against the petitioners. Let the statement of Smt.Meenakshi, Respondent No.2, be recorded. The Investigating Officer, Mr.Rajender Singh, Sub Inspector, has identified Smt.Meenakshi, Respondent No.2, and Shri Sher Singh, petitioner no.1. Statement of Smt.Meenakshi, Respondent No.2, has been recorded who has deposed that she does not want to continue proceedings arising out of her complaint being FIR No.200/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station: Anand Vihar. Learned counsel for the State has also no objection. No useful purpose Crl.M.C No.2066/2008 Page 3 of 3 would be served by continuing the proceedings in the facts and circumstances. In the totality of facts and circumstances, FIR No.200/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station: Anand Vihar, and all the proceedings arising and emanating therefrom against the petitioners are hereby quashed. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. Dasti. July 04, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. ‘Dev’