,,~^iSVSs Pl 13 lasss; f^i i^ffy^ 'IT'^e i^. ^ressni: Nirmat Singh, S/o Gurubacfian Sin^ Aged about 29 years, R/o Sector Qtr. No. 29, S-3, Bhilai, District (C.G.5. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Departrnent Mantralava, D.K.S. Bt of Transport, 2. Re.aiona! ~ Trans Authority, 3. 4 Chhattisgarh, Raipur. Secretary./ R.T.0. Rai .G.' !. Astam, R/o. Takiyapara, Dur^ Shri B.K. Rawat, learned counsel for the appetlanl n Kisnor ttpnsral fs eneral fer respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. •th order or' the Court was passed by Kajeev Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2. Appellant - Nirma! Singh has fiied this writ appeal against the orcier dated 31-03-2008, passed in W.P.(C) No. 1900/2008 whereby ths appeiiant's writ petitlon challenging the order dated 29-06-2006 ^•~-^:>. '^ 'f, c-:»-^ i .p 16 passed by Regional Transport Authority was dismissed on the ground of availabillty of the efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal tt- lant eouid not has an alternative remedy of fiiing an ^- iatsd. 29-06-2006 against the said order. 3. Shri 3.K. Rawat, Is dispute that the appellant sppea! against the order Transport Authority. 4. ' On due consideration of the su&missions of iearned counsei for the parties, v/e do not find. any infirmlty in th.e impugned order v'/hich may warrant interference in this writ appeal. 5. The writ appeai,.therefore; is liabie to be dismissed and !s 'by dismissed summarily. Sd/- Chief Justice Sun s<u- _. a^umarSinba 3udS<