IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 285 OF 2009 IN APPEAL UNDER ARBITRATION ACT NO. 1 OF 2010 STATE OF GOA THROUGH EX. ENGINEER P.W.D. ROADS NORTH PANAJI ... Applicant Versus M/S. GAMMON INDIA LTD. ... Respondent Shri S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Shri P. Talaulikar, Additional Government Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 12th January, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. Shri M. S. Sonak, learned Counsel for the Respondent has opposed the prayer for condonation of delay. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, we find that the delay of two days deserves to be condoned. Delay is condoned. Application is granted to that extent. NARESH H. PATIL, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.