IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.6558 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.10.2010 Sikandar. ....... Petitioner. Versus Deepmala and others. ....... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Shri A.K.Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner. .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. No legal infirmity has been pointed out in the impugned order. The grant of injunction or denial thereof is always a matter of discretion in the Court and unless some illegality which is palpable on the face of it, is shown to have been committed by the Court below, the revisional Court ought not to interfere. Noticing the facts of the instant case, the petitioner has been restrained from alienating and raising construction on the suit land whose title is in dispute. In this view of the matter, the impugned order cannot be said to be suffering from any perversity which would warrant interference in it by this Court. Dismissed. October 08,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge