: 1 : JO-367-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGES ORDER NO. 367 OF 2010 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.794 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 2324 OF 2007 Haresh T. Bhatia & Anr. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Vipul Mathurdas Thakkar & Ors. .. Defendants ......... Ms. Manorama Mohanty i/b S.K. Srivastav & Co. for the plaintiffs ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2011 P.C. : 1. By the draft Judge’s order, the plaintiffs want that possession of the part of the suit premises be given to them by breaking open the locks which are in possession of defendant no.1. According to plaintiffs, arrangement was arrived at in the consent terms to take possession of the premises by the plaintiffs. In the draft Judge’s order, no sketch is drawn so as to clarify as to which portion of the premises should be handed over to the plaintiffs. In view of this, this draft Judge’s order : 2 : JO-367-10=.sxw cannot be signed by the Court. It stands disposed of with no orders. Liberty is granted to the plaintiffs to place proper draft Judge’s order with proper sketch with dotted mark as regards the premises in which possession is sought. The judges order is disposed of in the above terms. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)