IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.32926 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 CHARANJIT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Kulbhushan Soi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. CM Munjal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.17 dated 19.5.2010 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1). 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent- State contends that before filing of the petition, final report under Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure, had already been filed before the concerned Magistrate and, therefore, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 3 I have considered the contention of learned counsel for the respondent-State. Criminal Misc. No.32926 -M of 2010 (O&M) 2 4 During investigation, certain evidence would have been collected so as to nominate the petitioner as accused. Without considering the said evidence/material, adjudication in this petition is not possible. 5 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. September 7, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?