skt/- 1 3.caw.1250.2010 wp 6836.2009.sxw SIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1250 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6836 OF 2009 Chirag Ashish Ved ... Petitioner Vs. Ashish Mahendra Ved ... Respondent ...... Mr.V. Mishra, for the petitioner. Mr.Mukesh Pabari for the respondent. ...... CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 27th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. By this Civil Application, the petitioner seeks to have the order of passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Mumbai on 6 th January 2010 set aside and direction to allow the petitioner to examine witnesses. The prayer in the petition is itself for a direction to the Family Court-II, Bandra, Mumbai for issuance of summonses to two witnesses. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that those two witnesses have been summoned and examined. Therefore, the purpose for which skt/- 2 3.caw.1250.2010 wp 6836.2009.sxw this petition was filed has, in fact, has been achieved. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by refusal by the Family Court to permit the petitioner to examine two more witnesses. This refusal came by an order dated 6 th January 2010 which is altogether a new cause of action. A different order is being challenged. The application is misconceived and it is rejected giving a liberty to the petitioner to seek such remedies as he desires to prosecute. [ R.C.CHAVAN, J. ]