D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO. 37/2008 Jagat Kumar Nahta v. State of Rajasthan & ors. Date of order : 25.04.2008 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI ... Mr. B.L.Maheshwari for the appellant Mr. B.L.Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Advocate Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State. By the order impugned, the learned Single Judge of this Court noticing the grievances of the writ petitioner that his application for grant of route permit is not being disposed of by the Regional Transport Authority, directed the authority concerned to consider the application of the writ petitioner as well as other applicants which are pending or those who may now apply for grant of permit on the on the said route in view of available vacancies on the said route. Learned counsel for the appellant mainly assailed the order impugned on the ground that his application alone was required to be processed by the authority and not applications of others, as they have never come to this court nor such prayer was made on their behalf. On plain reading of the order impugned it appears that the learned Single Judge of this Court, to avoid further complications, directed for disposal of the application of the writ petitioner along with others. This order obviously was passed owing to the - 2 - circumstances that all such applications for same route should be considered together. By passing the order impugned, in our view, the learned Single Judge of this Court has not committed any error nor the order impugned can be said to be without jurisdiction. For the reasons aforementioned, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. (M. N. BHANDARI ) J. (NARAYAN ROY),C.J. mathur/