IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4310 of 2010 1. IMTIYAZ AHMAD S/O ABDUL SAKUR R/O VILL.- DHUNDHIBAGH, P.S.- BARARI, DISTT.- KATIHAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KATIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KATIHAR, BIHAR 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER KATIHAR, BIHAR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION KATIHAR, BIHAR 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BARARI, KATIHAR, BIHAR 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER BARARI, KATIHAR, BIHAR 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SUKHASHAN PANCHAYAT BARARI BLOCK, KATIHAR, BIHAR 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SUKHASHAN PANCHAYAT BARARI BLOCK, KATIHAR, BIHAR 9. THE DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KATIHAR THROUGH ITS MEMBER ----------- 2 20/12/2010 The Court fails to understand the ground under which impugned annexure which is a decision rendered by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority should be interfered with in view of the clear finding recorded therein that petitioner has failed to produce necessary certificates for verification and examination of his claim. Failure on the part of the petitioner cannot be a - 2 - ground to entertain a writ application and give a direction for reconsideration. There being no merit in this writ application, it is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)