CWP 9295/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH SB Civil Writ Petition No. 9295/2010 Smt. Pushpa Raut Vs. State of Raj. & ors. DATE OF ORDER : 02/08/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Virendra Lodha, for petitioner. Petitioner stood retired from service on 31/07/1999 and the retiral dues were also paid as per the petitioner's own saying in 2000-01. However, it appears that he made representation with regard to the delay in payment of retiral dues and claiming interest thereof but the representation so made was also rejected in 2002 and the petitioner was informed that there is no delay which can be attributed to the respondents in making payment of the retiral dues. Instant writ petition has been filed after almost more than 8 years of the communication being made and the petitioner appears to be satisfied by the communication. The submission made that the petitioner is entitled for interest over the delay in payment of retiral dues, in the facts of the instant case, is without substance for the reasons that the petitioner was satisfied with communication and has not taken any action at all. Apart from inordinate delay, which remained unexplained, in the opinion of this Court, after the CWP 9295/2010 [2] communication was made no contrary material has come on record that delay was attributable to the respondents and in such circumstances, it cannot be said that the decision of the respondents was arbitrary which may call for interference. Consequently, the writ petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu-9295-CW-2010-final.doc