1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION M.C.A.NO.100/2007 Ashwini Dhairyasheel Bhosale Appellant Vs. Dhairyasheel T.Bhosale Respondent Mr.R.S.Khadapkar for the appellant Mr.Sachin Shetye i/b Ms.RevatiMohite-Dere for the respondent CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 12th December,2008 P.C. 1] Admit.Heard finally. 2] I am not inclined to transfer the matter from Satara to Vardha. 3] The petitioner does not allege that she is not physically and mentally fit to travel to Satara which is at the distance of about 1,000 K.M.. She, however, states that it is difficult for her to undergo this long journey. On the other hand on behalf of the respondent it is submitted that the petitioner is physically and mentally fit to undergo the journey from Vardha to Satara. The custody of the only child , a daughter, aged six years is with the respondent. The respondent intends examining several witnesses including the authorities of the school in which the petitioner was employed ,who reside at Satara. The petitioner has been attending the Court at Satara for about two 2 years in connection with the interim application for the custody of the child. In the circumstances the balance of convenience requires that the matter be heard and tried in Satara . In the circumstances the M.C.A. is dismissed subject to the respondent paying to the petitioner the costs for each visit to Satara in connection with the litigation fixed at Rs.3,000/- per visit. M.C.A.is disposed of accordingly.