1 S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 959/2006 Daulat Singh vs The State of Rajasthan & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 13.2.2007 HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI G.S. SARRAF Shri AK Singh,for the petitioner. Shri SN Tiwari, Public Prosecutor. Shri MS Purohit, for the respondent no.2. <><><> This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 12.1.2006 of Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bikaner by which the application of the petitioner filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for impleading the respondent no.2, father- in-law of the deceased Surgyan Kanwar as additional accused in the case under Sections 304-B, 498-A and 406 IPC was dismissed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent no.2. The power conferred under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is an extra ordinary power which should be used very sparingly and only if compelling reasons exist for taking cognizance. I have gone through the order of the Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bikaner very carefully and I find that it is a reasoned order. The 2 learned court has discussed the evidence available on record in right perspective and I have no reason to take a different view in the matter. There is no ground for interference. The revision petition, therefore, stands dismissed. (G.S. SARRAF), J. cpgoyal/-