IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15058 of 2009 KUMAR AMRENDRA PRASAD VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 26.11.2009 This matter has come at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that in fourth paragraph of the order dated 11.11.2009 due to inadvertence instead of respondent no. 3 it has been mentioned as respondent no. 2. Accordingly, let the word “respondent no. 2” in the aforesaid paragraph be read as “respondent no. 3”. The order dated 11.11.2009 is modified to the above extent. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)