IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9975 of 2010 1. HARI HAR MANDAL S/O SONE MANDAL R/O VILL.- RAMPUR, P.S.- RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. with Cr.Misc. No.8176 of 2010 UMESH SAH, S/o Rameshwar Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 364 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners’ name was disclosed in the confessional statement of the co-accused Radhe Sah as being involved in the present kidnapping for ransom and they have also criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, since the said Radhe Sah has been acquitted by the court below after full fledged trial, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioners’ case shall not be bifurcated for purpose of commitment and framing of charge. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)