1 app272.10gp.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 272 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 894 OF 1990 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1583 OF 2010 IN APPEAL NO. 272 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 894 OF 1990 Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. Appellants. Vs. The Board of the Trustees of the Port of Bombay & Anr. Respondents. WITH APPEAL (L) NO. 312 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 894 OF 1990 The Indian Express Limited ...Appellants. Vs. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay and Anr. ...Respondents. Ms. N.Sumanani i/by M/s. Bhatt and Saldanha for the Appellants in Appeal No. 272 of 2010 and for Respondent No.2, in Appeal (L) No. 312 of 2010. Mr. Vinayak Shete i/by Poorvi Kamani for the Appellants in Appeal (L) No. 312 of 2010. Mr. U.J. Makhija i/by M/s. Motiwalla & Co. for Respondent No.1. 2 app272.10gp.sxw ssm CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2010 P.C.:- The learned counsel appearing for the Appellants, in each of the appeals state that the dispute is settled under the Scheme and whatever the amount as agreed is paid to the Respondent and therefore seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Appeals. Mr. Makhija, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1, the Board of the Trustees of the Port of Bombay, also confirm the said aspect. Both the Appeals are accordingly allowed to be withdrawn. The refund of Court fee, if any, as per the rules. 2 Mr. Makhija, the learned counsel appearing for the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, fairly states that the amount is already received under the scheme and therefore, there is no question of executing any decree passed in the suit in question. The said statement is accepted. 3 Appeal (Lodging) No. 614 of 2010, filed by The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, be placed on board for admission on 19/10/2010. 4 In view of the withdrawal of Appeal No. 272 of 2010, nothing survives in Notice of Motion No. 1583 of 2010 and the same is also disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)