1 SSK/56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8333 OF 2009. M/s. Jai Vijay Tractors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Sangli Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. N. K. Khasbardar i/b. Mr. N. P. Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Narendra Walawalkar, Sr.Advocate with Mr. G. H. Keluskar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 26th MARCH, 2010. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The Respondent No. 1-Bank filed Dispute No. 750 of 2002 against the Petitioners for recovery of an amount of Rs.42,28,660.32 paise. The Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 have also filed Dispute No.964 of 2004 against the Respondent No.1-Bank for recovery of amount of Rs. 89,52,000/-. One more dispute is filed by Respondent No.1 against the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.2 to 4 i.e. Dispute No.147 of 2004 for recovery of an amount of Rs.5,74,681/-. 2 3. The Petitioners filed an application at Exhibit “78” in Co- operative case No.750 of 2002 with a request to the Court to club all the three disputes together and record common evidence. This request was rejected by the Co-operative Court. The said order was subsequently confirmed by the Co-operative Appellate Court in Appeal at the instance of the Petitioners and therefore, the present petition. 4. The Petitioners’ above request was rejected mainly on the ground that the subject matter of all the three disputes are totally different and therefore, if any common evidence is recorded, it will create hurdle and complication. After perusal of the disputes, I find no error in the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed. 5. The Co-operative Court No.1, Sangli, however, is directed to decide the Co-operative Case No.750 of 2002 filed by the Respondent No.1, Co-operative Case No.964 of 2002 filed by Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 and Co-operative Case No.147 of 2004 filed by Respondent No.1, one after another. (R. V. MORE, J.)