CR No. 1545 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1545 of 2011 Date of Decision: 07.03.2011. Bansidhar .......Petitioner Vs. Devinder Kumar and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Gaurav Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff has filed a suit for possession. The defence of the petitioner-defendant was struck off vide order dated 31.1.2005. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application to lead his evidence. Vide impugned order dated 24.1.2011, the said application was dismissed by the trial court. Hence, the present petition by the defendant. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. The defence of the petitioner was struck of vide order dated 31.1.2005. The petitioner filed a Civil Revision No. 8414 of 2010 challenging the said order and the same was dismissed as withdrawn on 23.12.2010. The application by the petitioner for permission to lead the evidence was liable to be dismissed as the CR No. 1545 of 2011 -2- defence of the petitioner had been struck of vide order dated 31.1.2005. In view of the above factual position, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE March 07, 2011 Gurpreet