Cr. Revision No. 150 of 2009 12.05.2010 Present: Mr. S. D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Upadhya, Advocate, for the respondent No. 1. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent No. 2. Learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Shimla disposed of the appeal on the statements of learned counsel appearing for the parties, as instructed by the respective parties whom they were representing that a particular sum of money will be paid on or before the next date, failing which the appeal would be deemed to have been dismissed. Without going into merits of the respective contentions of the parties herein, this petition is allowed for the reason that the liberty of a particular can not be circumscribed by the statement made by counsel. It would be a different matter all together in case the petitioner herein had made his personal statement in the form of an undertaking. I express no opinion on merits of the case of the parties. I am also alive to the conduct of the petitioner herein which is writ large. I need not so say anything further as it may prejudice the case of the parties. In these circumstances, this case is remanded to the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla. The parties shall appear in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla on 31st May, 2010. A direction is issued that since the case is hanging fire since the year, 2002, the learned Sessions Judge shall dispose it of not later than 30th June, 2010. No adjournments shall be granted to any of the parties. This Revision Petition is disposed of. May 12, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), (KRS) Judge