IN 1 ingi$ Be'ngh THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ‘ f 1 : BILASPUR \ W.P. (S) No; w“ OF 20h / I , Kavita Vaishnav, Age -22 year, D/o Shri Vijay Kumar Vaishnav R/O Village- Aakola,P.O.-Konargarh Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State Of Chhattisgarh . Through — Secretary Panchayat D. K.S. Bhavan Raipur Dist. Raipur (C.G.) ‘ 2. Collector Korba, Dist. Korba (C.G.) Block Education Offlcer Pall Dist. Korba (C.G.) 4. / Janpad Panchayat Though — Chief Executive Officer Pali, Dist. Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ruuu puuxu Ur Ll-IHATTISGARI-I AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2410 of2011 PETITIONER : Kavita Vailshnav VERSUS z WRII PEIITION UNDER ARHCLE 226 01* 1HE CONSLIFUTION OF IN DIA RESPONDENTS : ' State of C attisgarh & Others. SB Hon’ble Sim 9amhli Agmhotm J Present. hm Ravmdra Sharma, Advoca‘te appears on behalf of Shrl H.V. Shanna, Advocate for the fpetitiomr. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORDER g0RAL) (Passeo on 6 day ofMay, 2011) :1. At the very outset. learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue involved in this case is with regard to order dated 22.02.2011 passed by the Collector, Korba, which came up for consideration before this Court in Seema Dubey v. 'Srate bf Chhattisgarhi & Other connected matters. This Court, after hearing Val} the parties, considered the issue and passed the order in Seema Dubey (supra). This petition may also be disposed of accordingly. s 2. Thus, having regard to the facts situation of the case, wherein the issue involved 1n beema Dubey (supra) as u ell as 3n this case are one ‘ and the same the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in .Seema‘Dz/zbey (su r . Sci/- é: ’ SatishK Agmhotl" .1 E 5 ' Judge ‘ i .// W.P.{S) No. 1520/201 i, decided on 29.04.2011 i a . x ; ‘