1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD).No.3051 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Mrs.J.Gnana Pushpam, W/o.Kadarkarai, Secondary Grade Teacher, Appavu Middle School, Arulachi, Vasudevanallur Range, Tirunelveli District. : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Correspondent, Appavu Middle School, Arulachi, Tirunelveli District-627 760. 2.Mr.R.Rajendran, The Enquiry Officer, Appavu Middle School, Arulachi, Vasudevanallur Range, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Vasudevanallur, Tirunelveli District. 4.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the first respondent dated 10.03.2011, quash the same and consequently, directing the first respondent to give all the relevant documents which was asked by the petitioner in her representation dated 15.02.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For Respondents 3&4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 O R D E R ******* Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of respondents 3 and 4. In view of the limited order to be passed hereunder, I am not ordering notice to respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition challenging the impugned notice of the first respondent dated 10.03.2011, asking the petitioner to appear for an enquiry and consequently, directing the first respondent to give all relevant documents, which were asked by the petitioner in her representation dated 15.02.2011. 3. The main reason that has been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition is that the documents sought for by the petitioner were not furnished to her. It is also stated that a representation has been given seeking such documents. However, the same was not considered so far and the documents sought for by the petitioner were not furnished to her. In such circumstances, the relief that has been sought for by the petitioner should be only directing the first respondent to provide with all documents. But, however, the petitioner is challenging the impugned notice of the first respondent dated 10.03.2011 and consequently, seeking a direction to the first respondent to give all documents, which were asked by the petitioner in her representation. The petitioner's intention seems to be to drag on the enquiry. 4. In view of the above stated position, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to provide the necessary documents to the petitioner, which are necessary for the enquiry. The petitioner can also be permitted to peruse the documents, a copy of which could not be furnished to the petitioner. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 To 1.The Correspondent, Appavu Middle School, Arulachi, Tirunelveli District-627 760. 2.Mr.R.Rajendran, The Enquiry Officer, Appavu Middle School, Arulachi, Vasudevanallur Range, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Vasudevanallur, Tirunelveli District. 4.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli. SML rl/5c – 16.3.2011 Order made in W.P.(MD).No.3051 of 2011 Dated:- 16.03.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/