6 d^- ^o-/ •'C.lm IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. S/?3 /2010 PETITIONERS < ^ tc'.4 \ov\^>y ^ "••'w'^' ^^y j^ sS' ,<* ^ff' -' evsi~ . •' ^ .. ..••• <i< &^r S /;'"'Si=i. _S(V <,sv'^ :-^6-"»..<^ ,<5 wy^ 2^" ^ 1. Dullu Ram Sori, S/o Shri Mahadev, aged about 47 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Dumarpita, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2'. Paikeshwar Manjhi, .S/o Gulab Singh Manjhi, aged about 45 years, Head Master, Primary School, Kushkona, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Gorakhnath Yadu, S/o Jaglochan Yadu, aged about 45 years, Head Master, Primary School, Dhugiyamunda, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Prakashchand Sinha, S/o Makund Ram Sinha, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Kuthkona, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) -/ RESPONDENTS ^fC"1"'"'u'^ .^•"^^'fg '-toM3t^'-^' ^t ^~ -^tl- ^^^. ./A^' '%y'1 B-g^"".^ ,.^_«.a'S' i^^^^'-"'' 5. Naresh Chandra Tandilya, S/o Shri Ganesh Ram, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Kumhadai Khurd, Block Devbhog, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1: State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ' District Education officer, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Coramissioner, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development, Department, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Devbhog, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ 'I-HC—78 .\ -o *ll*ldl th*ll<h -ysf -^w\c\^, fiiiS\w\'a, rq<ni^y ^...^:..(?.-..^3..A..:...^^.^200 sn^na'^ (ijql^qi,^) ssiv w fi.-n* WI 3il^T aiiif TCTIW^ c'W^I ^NOT^ wraf ^ feat TfSre?r ^; aifgii 3d^( •?BTH^TBI,E-MR. JL'ST!CB_PR!T_tKKBRDIWAKER 09.09.2010 Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsi^l for the petitioners. Smt. SmitaGhai, P.L. forthe^tate. Grievance of the petitioners 11)1 the present petition is that thev were appointed as Assistant Teachet-s, thev have oassed B.Ed./'D.Ed. examination at their own expensi{s dunng seivice, however, the petitioners have not been granted two increments as per circuiar dated24,12.l998. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts and auesticn of law involved in the present petitjion are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the matter |of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwai Vs. Muaictpal Corporatioa, Dufg ^ Another, 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96 & the petitioners' are also entitled for two increments as oer circular dated 24.12:98. This fact is not disputed by thi State counse!. !n view'of above, the petition| is disposed of in terms oi' the decision ot fhis Court in the matter (sf 1?ashwaat Kumar BbaTadwaj (supra), subject to verification oi fche f^.cfc as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed/D.Ed certificate ^t their cwn expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.98 and furthe two a.avance increraents or not. wnether tftey nave been paicl Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge