1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.430 OF 2002 1. Shri B.S.Kamble 2. Shri A.D.Wakode 3. Shri G.K.Doiphode 4. Shri D.S.Bhosale 5. Shri Rambhau Kapse 6. Shri Suresh Karpe 7. Shri Anil Tingote 8. Shri Y.G.Kadam 9. Shri Sandipan Savte 10. Shri Sadashiv S.Sangde 11. Shri S.V.Tupkar 12. Shri Laxman Patil 13. Shri Ashok Kamble 14. Shri S.S.Gadre 15. Shri G.S.Kolhekar 16. Shri Ramrao Waghmare 17. Shri J.B.Sonkamble 18. Shri Y.M.Shelar 19. Shri Bhimrao Kasture 20. Shri Raju Kolte 21. Shri R.V.Ambhore 2 22. Shri Tukaram Jondhale 23. Shri Dayaram Kasbe 24. Shri N.S.Kolimbikar 25. Shri Prabhakar Bhosale 26. Shri A.T.Hingole 27. Shri Sakharam Kandhare 28. Shri Suresh Ambulgekar 29. Shri M.T.Godghase 30. Shri Babu Jadhav 31. Shri Ramesh Indurikar 32. Shri Uttam Davane 33. Shri Gautam Walve 34. Shri S.P.Sakhare 35. Shri M.P.Waywal 36. Shri V.Z.Gavate 37. Shri V.K.Godbale 38. Shri V.M.Bhadre 39. Shri Suresh Sadavarte 40. Shri Rajesh Shelke 41. Shri Irbaji Waghchoure 42. Shri G.M.Shewalkar All Major, R/o Nanded, District Nanded .. Petitioners 3 Versus State of Maharashtra through Govt.Pleader/Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad .. Respondent Shri V.G.Gangapurwala, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioners Shri K.S.Patil, A.P.P. for respondent-State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ DATE : 16th February 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V.HARDAS, J.) 1. A communication addressed to this Court came to be registered as Criminal Writ Petition No.430 of 2002. Pursuant thereto, several orders had been passed by this Court in respect of the allegations made in the complaint. This Court by its order dated 25.11.2002 had appointed Advocate Shri V.G.Gangapurwala as an amicus curiae in this petition. Pursuant thereto, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor states on written instructions from the Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Nanded that a charge-sheet has been filed on 6.1.2005 against the five accused and the criminal case is now posted before the Special Judge on 7.4.2010. In that light of the matter, therefore, according to us the reliefs which are sought for by the petitioners in this petition have been rendered infructuous. This writ petition, therefore, stands dismissed as infructuous. We quantify the fees payable to Shri V.G.Gangapurwala, 4 learned Counsel appointed as amicus curiae on behalf of the petitioner at Rs.5,000/- (Rs.Five thousand), for the valuable assistance rendered by the learned Counsel to this Court. Petition is accordingly dismissed. Rule stands discharged. 2 Shri Gangapurwala, as a gesture of his concern for the welfare of the Advocates, states that the amount quantified as fees payable to the learned Counsel would be donated by him to the High Court Bar Association Library, Aurangabad. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) (vvr/430.02criwp)