Q Q/ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C)No. ‘qglB [2011 PETITIONER : Krishi Sakh Sahakari Samiti Kena Maryadit, Raipur, Registration No. 1247, through: its Member namely Harihar Barik, S/o. Vaishtam Barik, aged about 63 years, R/o. village Jalgarh, Post Chattigirola, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2] Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 3] Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Bank Maryadit, through: its Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahakari Bank Maryadit, Head Officer, Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4] Chief Executive Officer, District Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5] Nodal Officer, District Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 22 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA scq/ MN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 7813 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDERWARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA Y“; SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. AQ‘lgotri. J. Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1 and 2. O R D E R (Passed on 16m day ofDecember, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press other reliefs: except that the petitioner may be permitted to make a fresh representation to the respondent No. 1 to consider his application on the basis of several recommendations and resolutions, and in turn the respondent No. I may be directed to consider his representation in accordance with law, on its own merits and pass appropriate order, at the earliest. 2. Shn' Sao, learned Government Advocate appearing for the I State/respondent No. l and 2 submits that if such a representation is made: the same shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with law. 3. In View of the foregoing; the respondent No. 1 is directed to consider his representation as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks horn the date of receipt of the representation, on own its own merits and perspective and in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/— SATISH K. ANGNIHOTRI Judge PETITIONF‘R : Krishi Sakh Sahakan' Samiti Maryadit, Raipur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of