1 cam.187-2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 187 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2010 Nabanita Jena ..Applicant. Vs. Prakash Kumar Pattanayak ..Respondent. ----- Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil, for the Applicant. Mr. A.G. Damle, for the Respondent. ---- CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 06, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed for stay of the impugned judgment and decree. It appears that during the pendency of this appeal, learned counsel for the respondent-husband had made a statement that the respondent would not remarry, and in view thereof no ad-interim order was passed. 2 cam.187-2010 3. Mr. Damle, learned counsel for the respondent even today, on instructions, states that the respondent does not intend to remarry. Hence, the civil application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. The civil application is disposed of. (M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.) ( D.B. BHOSALE, J.)