IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5591 of 2009 1. ABHIJIT CHAURASIA @ PANKAJ 2. Bishwanath Mandal @ Chaurasia Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.5.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State and for the complainant who has appeared suo motu. The petitioners are the husband and father-in-law apprehending arrest in a complaint case under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Court below has observed in the concluding portion of the order as follows:- “In such view of the matter the very factum of lawful and legal marriage of the petitioner with the complainant does not appear to have been well established. The case brought for his abduction is earlier on the point of time i.e. two months before” This Court finds it difficult to appreciate the order of refusal to grant anticipatory bail after the aforesaid conclusion. There appears to be no co-relation between the discussion and the final order passed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Complaint case No. 748C of 2008. (Navin Sinha,J.) A.Kumar