IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18340 of 2010 1. BUCHCHI DEVI 2. Badhu Rajak @ Budhu Rajak 3. Munni @ Munni Devi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Informant’s daughter disappeared. Petitioners have been shown helping Munna Rajak with whom victim lady eloped or kidnapped. She appeared also. Her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. is recorded but only her coming to the family in which she names all the family members of Munna Rajak including petitioners but at the same time stating about her taking away to Lakhnow by Munna Rajak and in that course, no objection was raised on her behalf. Thereafter, she was taken to different places with the help of the petitioners but in reality it was the act of Munna Rajak either consented by the victim girl or her own lust but in any case refusal of anticipatory bail cannot be justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a 2 copy of this order in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 24 of 2010, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Katihar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)