;--1 ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT. BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No.....S(().^&........2011 PETITIONERS. <^\^y ^»•'€^ /^y ~ ^' ../o/ ^>- 1. Chhannulal Banchhore, aged 56, years, S/o Shri Brijlal Banchhore U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Teligundra, Tahsil Patan Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2. Nohar Singh Verma, Aged 57 years, S/o Shri Johansingh Verma, Head Master Govt. Middle School, Khamhariya, Tah. SE Distt. Durg C.G VERSUS RESPONDENTS /:S<5AM%\ '•'"I\ \'-'. \ /;::",/ ^•~<!f- \"l-\ i^n?^ l?i |^^aiS!F^ y%/ •~..^'^; (C?; (1) The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) (3) Block Education Officer Patan, Distt. Durg C.G. (4) Principal, Girls Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bemetara District Durg C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR BilANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. ^1. COCTRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIi.ASPQ'S »: KOK'BLB MR. JUSTICE PRiTIKIiER DIWAKBR PBTITIOMEKS versus Chhaaulel Baiidihore & othei-s Staie of'C.G. & Otbers Shri Soinkarit Verma, couzisel fcr the petitioners. Shri Praveea Das, Dv. G.A. for tlie State. Wi& me coaseiLt offhe parties, tl-ie aiatter is heard, finally. The petitioners were iaitiaUy appoiiited as Aasistant Teachcrs on a fixed pay ofRs. 100. After co'mpleaon oft'beir probation period, they were graDted regular pa.y scale ofRs. 169-300. Learaed counsel for t'te petitioners suoinits that tlie above iss-iie Iias bcen considered by flie M.P. State Admiiiistrative Tribuiial, Jabalpur in 0-A. No. 2745/89 foefaveen MadhiAant Yadu and 56 ofaers Vs. State of M.P. and ot'hers, whereia -it was beld faat the sirajlarly sitiiated teachers axe entitled to regi.ilar pay sca-le wi'fh effect froai the date ofiiiitial appo^tmest. Ttie .tnatter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreiae Court. The appcal wag dismissed by the Hon'ale S-dT.ireiae Coiirt upholding the decision of tne Tribuiial to tlie effect fb.at tlie 'T'cachers/ Assistamt Teacaers are entitled to regiilar pay scsle from. the .date of irutial appointinent. It is furtber subro.itted that tfeis G';urt while consideriiig the same issue in W.P. fS) No. 4725/2006 hetween Awir Sai Rani & Others Vs. State of Chha.ttisgarh and Others by order dated 01.09.06 a3owed the petitioaers to make icpresentation withix; a period of tea days, raising all the grievaiices. Accoixtiagty the petitioacrs are gisjntecl liberty to 'tuake a. representation r&ising aU bis grievaEices ia the iight of tlie aTbresaid judgmeEt asd fae circiilar dated 05.01.2011 (Annexiu-e P/5}, aiid iii ^ turu the conceraed respondent is directed to deci.de fb.e represeatatioa, if aay, in accordance with law, on its owii merits, witbiti a period of eigM weeks fi-om the date of receipt of tlie representatiou subject to verification of tfae facts. In view of the foregoifig, tt-iis petitioil is disposed of. No orcler ss to costs. Judge