IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12954 of 2005 Vinay Kumar Singh, son of late Arya Nand Singh, Resident of village Basti Jalal, P.S. Dighwara, District Saran………………………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Engineer-in-Chief cum Special Secretary, Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, Tube-Well at Patna. 4. The Superintending Engineer, Tube-Well Circle, Saran at Chhapra. 5. The Executive Engineer, Tube-Well Division, Chhapra………………………………………………..Respondents. For the petitioner :Mr. Dronacharya, Advocate. For the respondents :Mr. Shashi Shekhar Pd. Sinha, AC to GP-17 ---------------------------------- 02/ 25.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to pay the admitted bill of the petitioner for the works done by him as Class-II contractor in the Irrigation Department vide L.C.R. Agreement No.01 of 1993-94. 3. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the parties as well as the materials on record, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Executive Engineer, Tube Well Division, Chapra (respondent no.5) along with an application giving details of the dues with interest claimed by him. If such an application is filed within 15 days from today along with a copy of this order, the said authority shall consider the same and shall decide it by a speaking order in accordance with law within four months thereafter. If any amount or interest is found admitted and payable, it should be paid to the petitioner immediately thereafter. - 2 - However, if any amount or interest is not found admitted and payable in the said order, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. Harish (S.N.Hussain, J.)