mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3885 OF 2003 Ganpat Khanderao Pharande Applicant versus Suryakant Nathu Pharande & ors. Respondents None for the applicant. Chandrakant N. Chavan for respondents 1 to 8. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 09th February 2009 PC : 1. None appeared for the applicant when the application is called out on two occasions. The learned counsel for the first to eighth respondents states that the applicant or his advocate has not handed over to him the amount of costs of Rs.3,500/- till today. In view of this statement, it appears that the applicant has not complied with the condition precedent imposed by order dated 6th October 2006. As payment of costs was a condition precedent, it is obvious that in view of the default of the applicant, the order of dismissal of Criminal Application No.3885 of 2003 now stands. (A.S.OKA, J.)