IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-895 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.10.2010 Risal Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Sanjay Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Hooda, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel has stated that I.G. has already directed to re-investigate the case and a fresh investigation is in progress. In this view of the matter, the instant petition becomes infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such. Needless to mention that, if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the re-investigation of the case, then he would at liberty to file fresh petition in this connection. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 15, 2010 naresh.k