IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3472 OF 2005 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.1227 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1761 OF 2002 Anant G. Malik ....Appellant V/s. Castrol India Ltd. ....Respondents Mr.Abhay Kulkarni for the Appellant. Mrs.Swati Desai i/b Haresh Mehta & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay of 20 days. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)