(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5493 OF 2011 Sagarabai Raosaheb Surnar & another PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.M. Mane, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 4th OCTOBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: The petition involves various disputed questions of facts, which cannot be gone into by this Court under its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition is, therefore, rejected. Needless to say, in the event the petitioners avail of alternate efficacious remedy available in law, rejection of present petition will not come in the way of the petitioners while availing of such a remedy. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp5493-11 (2)