1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6332 OF 2009 Krantikari Jaihind Sena, a Political Party, registered with Election Commissioner of India, having its Office at 98, 2 nd floor, Esplanade PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS Mr.R.N.Kachave, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.V.H.Dighe, learned AGP for respondents/State (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 24/09/2009 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition filed ostensibly in public interest by the petitioner which claims to be a political party registered with the Election Commissioner of India, New Delhi and has a object of taking up cognizance against the corruption in the Co-operative Banks. The petitioner in the petition alleges several irregularities in the functioning of Nanded District Central Co-operative Bank. In this petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari for calling for the records of respondent no.2,3 and 17, and also prays for directing for appointment of an independent 2 agency to investigate and submit a report to this Court. By virtue of prayer clause B to the petition, the petitioner prays that an appropriate action against the persons guilty including attachment of personal properties of the ex-directors of respondent no.17 be initiated. Other prayer clauses are in respect of ad interim reliefs. The petitioner has annexed to the petition Exh.B. It is a reply submitted by the authorities pursuant to the request for information made under the Right to Information Act. Upon perusal of the aforesaid communication dated 20/09/2007 it appears that on account of certain erroneous decisions being taken by the Directors of the bank, the officers of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies, Latur have already taken certain action against them including action u/s. 88 of The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. It appears that certain appeal has been filed before the Minister wherein certain orders in respect of stay to the inquiry has been passed. 2. In the light of the aforesaid communication and in the light of the fact that the authorities have already taken cognizance of the grievance made by the petitioner, according to us, no cause for interference is made out particularly in the light of the fact that the authorities have already taken cognizance and consequently this petition sans merit and is summarily dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/SEP 2009/wp6332-09