CRM-M No.23250 of 2011(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.23250 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.11.2011 Gurbalhar Singh @ Mannu and another ...... Petitioners v. State of Punjab ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Santosh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the complainant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case F.I.R. No.111 dated 19.06.2011 registered under Sections 452, 323, 505 and 34 IPC at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana. On 03.08.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioners and the complainants are neighbours and the occurrence has taken place in the Gali and, therefore, Section 452 IPC is not made out.” CRM-M No.23250 of 2011(O&M) ::2:: Thereafter, learned counsel for the complainant had alleged that in fact the present was a case where Section 307 IPC has been made out. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the injury was subjected to examination by the Board of Doctors constituted by the Civil Surgeon, Ludhiana and the report thereof has gone in favour of the petitioners. On instructions from ASI Bhupinder Singh learned Deputy Advocate General as well as learned counsel for the complainant have accepted these factual assertions. In the circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. In the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 14, 2011 JUDGE ashish