WP(C) 945/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By means of this writ petition the petitioner, Mrs. Jyotika Deka, has c hallenged the selection and appointment of the respondent No. 6 as Anganwadi Wor ker by order dated 10.01.2011. The centre in which the respondent No. 6 has been appointed is Singimari Bagicha Asrampara Anganbadi Centre No. 48. The respondent No. 6 in her counter affidavit has alleged that the petit ioner has made forgery of her HSLC certificate and with that forgery she has par ticipated in the selection. By order dated 06.06.2011, Mr. T.C. Chutia, learned Standing counsel, SEBA was requested to obtain instruction regarding allegation of forgery in the HSLC certificate. As per the allegation, the Admit Card No. 1 01215 bearing Roll N5-554 No. 134 on which the petitioner has placed reliance i s a forged document. On receipt of the instruction, Mr. Chutia, learned Standing counsel, SEB A submitted that the allegation of forgery was correct. According to the petitio ner she has passed HSLC examination in the year 1995 and HSSLC examination in th e year 2000. It was submitted on behalf of SEBA that the Roll N5-554 and No. 134 belonged to one Shri Indrajit Mandal of Tangla Model High School who appeared i n the HSLC examination in the year 1995 and passed in the third division and no t that of the petitioner. The aforesaid instruction was furnished by Mr. Chutia, learned Standing counsel, SEBA by letter dated 14.06.2011 addressed to him by the Secretary, SEBA. When t he matter was taken up on 27.06.2011, none appeared for the petitioner. There wa s also no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 29.06.2011. Today learned c ounsel for the petitioner referring to Misc. Case No. 2229/2011, submits that he wants to withdraw himself from the engagement as counsel for the petitioner. T he said Misc. Case has been filed by the engaged counsel himself. On being asked as to whether any intimation was sent to the petitioner or not, learned counsel submits that she was informed over telephone and not in writing. Above aspect of the matter need not detain us in view of the fact that the petit ioner has not come forward to deny the aforesaid stand of the respondents that s he has forged the HSLC certificate of 1995. In view of the above and that the petitioner has not come forward with clean han d and has taken recourse to forgery, this writ petition is dismissed granting li berty to the SEBA to take appropriate action by way of lodging FIR etc. against the petitioner which will unearth the racket regarding forgery of certificates e tc. Writ petition is dismissed.