C.W.P. No. 12296 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 12296 of 2010 Date of Decision 15.07.2010 Satbir Singh Sandhu -----Appellant Versus Union of India and another ---Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. J.S. Jaidka, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. Kumar, J. The instant petition emerges out of the order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (for brevity 'the Tribunal') . There are categorical finding recorded by the Tribunal that the petitioner was appointed on contractual basis as Officer Incharge of ECHS, Poly Clinic at Air Force Station, Sirsa (Haryana) vide order dated 31.01.2007. The terms of the clause (i) of the agreement clearly specify that the nature of appointment is purely contractual and temporary in nature and he was engaged for a period of 11 months. According to Clause (iii), his remuneration was fixed at Rs. 15,000/- per month. Accordingly, the petitioner was intimated on 30.09.2009 that the term of C.W.P. No. 12296 of 2010 -2- appointment has expired on 02.11.2009 and he was to be relieved on 03.11.2009. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length and find no substance in the instant petition. Once the petitioner was appointed on contractual basis for a temporary period of 11 months then he could not have claimed anything more than what contract has given. He was intimated on 30.09.2009 with regard to his relieving w.e.f. 03.11.2009, no right of the petitioner can be said to have been violated. He cannot be held entitled to any enquiry, no case is made out for admission of the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) JUDGE July 15, 2010 Atul