1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.669/2008 (Narsingh Karva vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 26, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Prabhat Ojha, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that normally the payment is made by cheque and even if any amount alleged to have been collected by the petitioner from the firms situated in M.P., it has not been established and the same has not been placed in the police investigation diary. It cannot be said that the petitioner has embezzled any amount. On the contrary, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and contends that there are allegations against the petitioner of embezzling the amount and misappropriated the amount, which he collected from the various firms and did not deposit with the complainant and thus, committed the offence of misappropriation. Be that as it may, in such 2 matters, custodial interrogation is necessary and, therefore, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-