HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICITON Dated Nainital the 10th September, 2008 First Bail Application No. 651 of 2008 Order on the bail application of the accused. Gurveer Singh @ Ladi ….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …Opposite Party Case Crime No. 76 of 2008 U/s 2, 9, 39, 50 and 51 of Wild Life Protection Act Registered on the basis of F.I.R. dated 14/06/2008 Police Station Gadarpur District-Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the applicant; Mr Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for respondent/State; and perused the record. The fact that the leopard skin has been recovered from the possession of the accused/applicant; the accused/applicant was arrested at the spot; the Arresting Officer has stated in the memo of recovery that the independent witness could not turn u p to become the witness of the recovery, so the recovery was made in present of the police officials; and immediately after recovery, the said skin was indentified as skin of Leopard by the Deputy Rangers, I do not find any good ground to grant bail to the accused/applicant. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused/applicant is rejected. Misc. Application Nos. 1875, 1902 and 2142 of 2008 are disposed of. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 10.09.2008 Shiv