3»®3^»»He*s ^ BEFORE_^HS_STATS^AOMINISIRATIV]S- TRBUN^ AT JABALPUR... :-s".-2. l Origioal Application No.__'„ol 1995. A1PELICANT *** Bet-ween. TI-LAN SIl-^H VSRMA S/0 B.&.VS IA, Aged about 57 years/ Assistapt Pro£essor, Sovernme ot Soie ooe College, Baj0andga6D,(M.P.). Aod j, .RESPQNDENT3 **•* 1. State o£ Ma d bya Pradesfa, Througb its SeGretary, Btaopal,, 2» CoBiriiissiooery Hig feier Educa tio D, Bhopal. 3^ Additiooal Director, Higher Educatioo, Raipyr Bastar Div is io D, Raipur,(M.P.). APPLICATIQ6?.0NDE^,SECTION 19 OF ®iSA0MINISTAATIVE IBIBUNALS ACT.1985. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRFT PETITION (8) No. 1063 of2005 APPLICANT RESOPNDENTS NON-APPLICANTS Than Singh Veima. VERSUS State ofM.P. & 2 others. APPLICATION UNDER 8ECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALACT,1985 SB: Hon*Ne Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Sliri N.N.Roy, Paiiel Lawyerforthe State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 27th day ofOctober, 2009) 1. The matter is called for heai'ing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is dir€^tedto send a copy ofthis order to the petitioxier, forthwith. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit