IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 14283 of 2011 Date of Decision: 08.08.2011 Major Singh and another .Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Kewal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of mutation proceedings before the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Raikot, District Ludhiana, Nachhattar Kaur, respondent No. 4, has sold property in dispute in favour of the petitioners, therefore, the petitioners are necessary and proper party in the mutation proceedings and must be heard before sanctioning the mutation either in favour of Gurpal Singh, respondent No. 5 or in favour Nachhattar Kaur. Learned counsel states that the petitioners shall move an appropriate application before the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Raikot, District Ludhiana, respondent No.2, therefore, they may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (ALOK SINGH) 08.08.2011 JUDGE som