IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28098 of 2008 ADHIK YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12.09.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the State and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Initially a case was registered under Sections 341, 323, 354 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code on 01.03.2008 on the written report of informant Genda Prasad Verma that his minor daughter Sangita Kumari was dragged and attempt was made to outrage her modesty. It appears from Annexure-2 that the victim has given her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in the Court on 05.03.2008 that is after four days of occurrence in which she has stated that she was raped. Submission is that the victim was medically examined and the doctor has not found any evidence of rape, so Section 354 is not made out. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant has submitted that the victim is a minor and the witnesses have supported the case during investigation. The First Information Report is the written statement of the father of the victim. He in his statement has made out the case which comes under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Adhik Yadav is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha (Manikpur) P.S. Case No. 46/2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)