1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2007 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2007 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 149 OF 2007 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 79 OF 2007 Mrs. Milan Laxman Tandel .... Applicant Vs. Mr. Laxman Keshav Tandel .... Respondent Ms. Geeta Mulekar for the Applicant. None for Respondent CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ A.A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. 1) Heard. 2) For the reasons stated in the application, we find that it is not necessary to give notice to the Respondent in order to restore the petition. The petition came to be dismissed on account of default on the part of Lawyer. 2 3) Application is allowed. Appeal is restored. 4) Two appeals be listed for admission in next week. 5) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is also an application for condonation of delay in filing the matter, which is not restored. Learned counsel for the applicant to furnish the number of the application for condonation of delay. 6) S.O. one week. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.N. PATEL, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.N. PATEL, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.N. PATEL, J.)