IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 769 of 2008 National Centre for the Performing Arts ..Petitioner vs. 1. C.S.Ram Narayan and anr. ...Respondents Mr.K.M.Naik i/b Mr.S.P.Salkar for petitioner. Mr.Ravindra Sakpal i/b Mr.Rajesh Gehani for respondent no.1. CORAM S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 5th May, 2008 5th May, 2008 5th May, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Revisional Authority had refused to dismiss the revision application on the ground that the same is not maintainable because the workman has accepted a sum of Rs.25,000/- in full and final settlement, according to the petitioners. 2. In my view, any larger controversy need not be decided in this case because the order is interlocutory. The impugned order refuses to dismiss the revision application preferred by the workman only on the ground that he has accepted the amount allegedly in full and final settlement. It is not as if the petitioner is precluded from challenging the final order in the revision application. If the same are adverse to the petitioners, then, while impugning them, the petitioners can raise appropriate pleas with regard to refusal of the revisional court in dismissing the revision application at the threshold. All pleas are kept open and this Court has not expressed any opinion in that behalf. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with the above clarification. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)