FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE L.P.A.(ST) NO.19588 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr O.J.Menezes with Mr I.S.Mecwan, for the appellants CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED: 14.10.2005 P.C.: Heard the learned Advocate on merits of the Letters Patent Appeal. Though it is titled as a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, in pith and substance the prayers relate to quashing of order passed by the authority subordinate to the High Court, essentially it is invoking the powers of superintendence of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution. It is settled position in law that an appeal against such order is not tenable. Hence the Letters Patent Appeal dismissed, as not tenable. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR,J.)