IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-11067 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 18th April, 2011 Som Nath and another … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sandeep S.Majithia, Advocate for the petitioners. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.313 dated 24.07.2010 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Amritsar under Sections 323, 341 and 506 IPC. Complainant-Respondent No.2 in the impugned FIR stated that his elder daughter Rekha was married with petitioner No.2-son of petitioner No.1 in the year 2004. A matrimonial dispute arose between them due to which a number of cases are pending against each other. A grievance has been made in the impugned FIR that husband of daughter of the complainant has involved them in various cases only to harass them. On the day of occurrence, the complainant along with his daughter had gone to meet his advocate and when they were near the corner of the Court, petitioner No.2 accompanied by his father blocked their way, gave a threat and abuses, and also dragged them. When an objection was raised the accused gave slaps to the complainant. Criminal Misc. No. M-11067 of 2011 (O&M) In the present petition, the petitioners have made a grouse that various complaints have been submitted against them to various authorities and therefore, the present incident is nothing but a counterblast. A perusal of the present petition reveals that the petitioners have also filed four complaints in various courts, in which complainant- respondent and his daughter (the aggrieved wife) have been summoned to stand trial along with the other members of their family. A possibility that the petitioners made an attempt to threaten the wife and gave slaps to her father-complainant cannot be ruled out. In the present petition, no averment has been made regarding the stage of investigation. The petitioners and family of complainant-respondent No.2 are engaged in fierce litigation. Disputed questions of facts are involved in this case. Hence, this Court cannot entertain the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE April 18, 2011 rps 2