1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1856 OF 2009 CFL Capital Financial Services Limited ...Petitioners Versus IndusInd Bank Limited & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Pratik Sancheti with Mr. J.K. Mitra i/by M/s. D’Lima & Associates for the Petitioners Ms. V.D. Jaisingh for Respondent No.1 Mr. R.A. Rodrigues for Respondent No. 14. CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE: MARCH 26, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. 2. The only contention raised before us by the petitioners is that due to the introduction of Section 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956, the petitioners would not be in a position to comply with the order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, II, modified by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, which are impugned in the petition. 2 3. The order dated 20th January, 2009 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal correctly explains the dilemma in which the petitioners find themselves. 4. Therefore, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter in the exercise of our Writ Jurisdiction. The petition is dismissed. J.N. PATEL, J. A.P. BHANGALE, J.