IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1880 of 2011(H) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- MALAVIKA T.SURESH, D/O. SURESH BABU, AGED 15 YEARS, CAPTAIN OF GANAMELA GROUP, HOLY FAMILY CGHS., THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER SURESH BABU, S/O. CHOTHI, THUPPALY HOUSE, P.O.PATTIKKAD, PANANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE GENERAL CONVENOR FOR KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2010-2011, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR-680 001. 4. THE APPEAL COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR), THRISSUR REVENUE DISTRICT-680 001. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DILEEP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 1880 of 2011 H ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Thrissur Revenue District School Kalolsavam, petitioner's team participated in the item 'Ganamela'. They were given 2nd prize with 'A Grade'. According to the petitioner, they were denied the prescribed form for filing an appeal. It is contending that the assessment of performance by the Judges was erroneous, this writ petition is filed. 2. According to the petitioner, their performance was superior to that of the first prize winner team. Every participants will believe that their performance is the best. However, in this writ petition, no materials are produced to show that the evaluation by the Judges is erroneous. Therefore, this Court will not be justified in upholding the petitioner's contention. Added to this, it is a fact that the first prize winner team has not been impleaded in this writ petition. W.P.(C) No.1880/2011 : 2 : In such circumstances, this Court will not be justified in passing any order as sought for. Therefore, I am not persuaded to interfere with the matter. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge