IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2858 OF 2008 Ejaz Ahmed and others. ... Petitioners Vs. The Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents Mr. Gulam Rasoolkhan for the petitioners. Ms. Geeta Jogalekar for the BMC. Mr. Chetan Kapadia i/by M/s. Kishore Thakordas & Co. for the respondent No. 3. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 17TH JUNE, 2009 P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that she has taken instructions and according to the instructions received by her, construction has been completed and the Corporation has started the process of issuing completion certificate as well as occupation certificate. However, she submits that in the present writ petition, the petitioner hardly had an interest. Despite that, the Corporation would hear the petitioners and pass appropriate order. 2. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in this petition. Necessary order shall be passed within six weeks from today. Writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.