:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.113 OF 2008 Shri.Ramchandra S. Patil. ..Appellant. Vs. Shri. Shankar S. Patil and ors. ..Respondents. Mr.D.B.Patil for the Appellant. Mr.M.R.Suryawanshi for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 16th June,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is a second appeal filed by the original defendant no.2. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are the real brothers of the plaintiff. Both the courts have found that the plaintiff was in possession and the decree is for injunction. There is concurrent finding that there was partition between the brothers in the year 1954 and different shares were allotted to them. It is sought to be contended that the real dispute is between the respondent No.1 and 2 who are having adjoining land to each other and the appellant has his land beyond the land of the respondent No.2. It is always open for the defendant No.2 to disturb the possession of the plaintiff notwithstanding that his land is not contiguous. In my view, there is no substantial question of law in the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed. C.C. expedited. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)