IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14718 of 2007 SHAMA AFROJ, D/O KHURSID ANWAR, R/O VILLAGE LAHSANIA, P.S PATHAI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ. 2.DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, EAST CHAMPARAN. 3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, EAST CHAMPARAN. 4.SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PAKRI DAYAL, EAST CHAMPARAN. 5.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PATAHI BLOCK, EAST CHAMPARAN. 6.BLOCK EXTENSION EDUCATION OFFICER, EAST CHAMPARAN. 7.DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MOTIHARI, EAST CHAMPARAN. 8.DASRATH MAHTO, S/O LATE PRAHLAD MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE DEVAPUR AT PRESENT MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, DEVAPUR, EAST CHAMPARAN. 9.GANESH PRASAD YADAV, S/O SARYUG PRASAD YADAV, R/O VILLAGE JUGULIA, PS MADHUBAN DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN AT PRESENT PANCHAYATA SECRETARY OF PATHI EAST PANCHAYATA AND DEVAPUR PANCHAYATA, PS PATHI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 25.11.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Having regard to the fact that the claim of arrears of salary of the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 55,000/- has been not only admitted by the respondents but in the counter affidavit filed by them in paragraph no. 6, it has also been stated that the due salary of the petitioner up to October-2007 has already been paid, would make this application infructuous specially 2 when the petitioner did not controvert such facts mentioned in the counter affidavit copy whereof was served on his counsel on 08.10.2009. That being so this application has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)