1 Cri.Appln. No.2207.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2207 OF 2011 Anjali W/o Sayaji Sul, Age 35 years, Occu. Household, R/o Tambri Vibhag, Osmanabad Tq. & Dist. Osmananabad ..APPLICANT. VERSUS 1] The State of Maharashtra, (Copy to be served on P.P. High Court Bench at A’bad) ..RESPONDENT ... Mr. S.S. Sawalkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE: 6th June, 2011 PER COURT: 1. This application is filed for bail, in crime No. 118 of 2010, registered in Osmanabad (City) Police Station, 2 Cri.Appln. No.2207.11 Osmanabad, for an offence U/Sec. 376,363,366 r.w. 34 of Indian Penal Code and 3,4,5 & 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The papers of investigation are made available by APP. Heard learned counsels for the parties. The learned Counsel for the applicant vehemently submitted that as other co-accused are granted bail, the present applicant may kindly be granted bail on the ground of parity. He also submitted that the investigation is completed and there is no reason to keep the applicant behind bars. 2. The report is given by victim/prosecturix, thereby alleging that her mother’s sister namely Daivshala Balwande is residing in Kishanrao Chopade’s house, and Daivshala’s daughter Anjali Sul / present applicant is residing neighbor hood to her. The prosecutrix was visiting frequently to the house of Daivshala and there prosecutrix met Anjali Sul. The prosecutrix saw that some unknown persons were visiting Anjali’s house. The present applicant then started introducing her to persons who were visiting her house. The applicant had told to the prosecutrix that in the prostitution business money can be made easily. On 03-05-2010, in the house of applicant one person committed rape on the prosecutrix. The applicant 3 Cri.Appln. No.2207.11 took Rs. 800/- from the said person and she give Rs. 300/- to the prosecutrix. Then the prosecutrix was taken to lodge where she was to stay. The prosecutrix has described the other incidents in which many persons committed rape on her, due to opportunity made available by present applicant. The prosecutrix was taken to various places. The name of the persons who acted as agents in the business, and who used to force the prosecutrix are mentioned in the report. Ultimately, when on the last occasion six persons committed rape on prosecutrix one after another, the prosecutrix became sick and she some how approached police and gave report. 3. On the basis of information given by the prosecutrix, so many persons came to be arrested. It is submission of the learned counsel that the other co-accused got bail, and so the applicant should also get bail. The aforesaid circumstances. show that the applicant dragged the prosecutrix in the business of prostitution. There was no support to the prosecutrix, and the applicant misused this circumstance. 4. In view of the circumstances, it is not fit case for granting bail to the applicant. As charge sheet is filed in the trial Court, 4 Cri.Appln. No.2207.11 trial can be expedited, and the present application stands rejected. [T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] SDM* 2207.11Cri.Appln.