é H¥$n COURT OF CHHAT'HSGARH AT BILASPUR Petitéaner Edmund Kujur, Sie Late Pitu Kajur. Aged about 67 yrs, Rio House No. 3/585, Ring Road No.2. Shanti Nagar, Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus Respandents 1. sme of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretary. Genera! Administration Department DKS Bhawan. Raipur ic.r:_x \ VI 2, The Additiona! Secretary, Genera! Administraticn Department state cf Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (QGJ 3. Siate of Madhya Pradesh — Through the Secretary, Genera! Administratien Department, VaRabh Bhavan, Bhepai (Mm WRH' PEiiTmN UNDER AR ! ICLE 225 GF THE CONSTWUWQ” OF {NDIA srngle Bench : Hen'ble Mr. 5atish K. Agnihotri, J. 8hr? Mariish Shame, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri M. P. S. Sharia, Deputy Gevt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 ‘& 2. 03$. QRDER (Passed on i'nis 215‘ day of ApriL 2008) 1. With the ccheent ef learned counset appeartng for the parties, the petition is heard tinatty. yo Learned counse! appeartng for the petitioner, on inetructécne: eubmtts that the eetttteher cent’rnes his prayer to consideration of his representation dated 28.8.2006 (Annexure Pits}, pending before the Pri rcipet Secretary, Generet Administration Department. on its own merits. in accordance with iaw. igr. J“4 x,»fv ’ i», gu Jh. cs>_ Thakur u.vg. ' W um ‘ Shri Bhatia, {earned counsei appearing for the resg30ndents/Stat$ aubmits that there is no reason why the pending fepresentaticn wauid net be decided by the cmcemed autharity, expedi:§au3iy. Since the rewesematmn §s pending from 28.8.2003, therefore, it is expedient that the representatien he decided by the concerned euiherity, on its awn merits. in ecccrdance with iaw, within a peried of three menihs fromthe date of receipt ef a copy ef this order. it is ordered accordingiy, in View of the toregcing, this petition etands dieposed ef. No costs. i _“_ ##v i u; L" I Sdj‘ u t u Satish K. Agmhotn V Judge ‘ J.r-iM -,,