IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5762 of 2011 BIKASH PRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the Complainant. The petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned Counsel for the petitioner and the complainant on instruction submitted that both sides are ready to reconcile. However the complainant has apprehension about assault and abuse being made by the petitioner for which during pendency of the present case some information was given to the Police. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that that the petitioner undertakes not to ill treat the complainant henceforth. The contention of the petitioner that he is paying maintenance has also been controverted by the learned Counsel for the complainant. Considering the aforesaid stand, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail provisionally for a period of six months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 1491 ( C ) of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the petitioner and the complainant appear before the Court below on 29.4.2011 when the petitioner will take her to her matrimonial home to keep her as wife with full dignity. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below on two eventualities i.e. either on restoration of matrimonial harmony substantially or the complainant refuses to reside with the petitioner. Snkumar/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)