-jtSlirer jiaaiiii J» jndre'g 'uv/AvVf ao4B3np',T IJBfiSU: ('0'3)BdatBqO '^ (•0-3) s"3'G iroiui- •AJ'B+3J39S-:4SnOjqj^ J ('O'O) BdtuBt{3-ji8ftiBf -•USiQ °qys-yo[g 'jtidusqa 'poqog 0 "'S T "°LL 'SJBSA Qt7 inoq'B s§V '-TOAAUB^ vw^ UIT<5 0/s :i s?srs?TA' -JI3 (•O'O)TOTIU D "USICI 'MBS-:SI30t3 'BpJB§BN[ /•—--^-^^„ SBJBJ uqg o/g 'jaqoBsj^ I.UB}SISSV 'SJBSA ('O'O) t'"u»?q3 -Jlgl >t^' •roqog' AJBulUa 'l.i 'SJBSA 6£ WOqB Aiqg uqg o/g . j 'j.auQVS^ },u'eiSffiSY ?V 'JWAUBg pBSBJj [01 .i-Sj ¥!.3 iLiLXA^^ 3. BIock Education Officer. Block- Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Present: Shri Aiav Shri Arvind Dubey, Pa Tt Advocate for the petitioner nel Lanyer for the State ' I5?^i?' sth ^c (Passed on 5U1 ofApril, 2007) The question of law involved herein asto whether the Detitioners are entitled to regular nav scale w.e.fthe date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Leamed counsel appearias for the petitioners as v'ell as for the State/'respondents jointly submit that the facts and quesrion of }aw involved in the present writ petition are the as to tha.t of in W.P.fS) No. 5976/2006 xnc. <" & Othei'sl which was allowed vide ordsr dated7.il.2006. 3. In view ofthe above-stated 'submissions mads by learned counsel for tfae oarties. the writ >n is m tt saine tenns. No order as to eosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge