{1} FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATIO NO.4453 OF 2009 Padma P. Mali Vs. Rajshree R. Tajule IN FA ST NO.7790/09 Office notes, office memorandum of coram, appearances, court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri B.R.Warma, advocate for applicants Shri *** Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J. Date: 24th June 2009. 01- Heard learned counsel for the claimant. There is delay of five days in seeking to challenge the order dated 24/11/2008 by the learned Chairman MACT, Parbhani rejecting to entertain the petition under Sec.140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The delay is apparently no deliberate. The right accrued to the claimant should not be scuttled on this technical aspect. Delay is condoned. Application is allowed. [K.U.CHANDIWAL] JUDGE /mda/0609/ca4453.09