IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7042 of 2008 Decided on: 06.09.2010 Manmohan Singh and others. …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioners are seeking directions to the respondent- State for counting the tenure service rendered by them followed by regularization for the purpose of pensionary benefits and increments. This question is covered by the judgments rendered by this Court in Paras Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No. 7712 of 2008, Thakuri Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP(T) No. 4357 of 2008 and Sita Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, LPA No. 36 of 2010. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioners for counting the tenure period followed by the regularization for the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- purpose of increments and pensionary benefits with all consequential benefits, within a period of three months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 6, 2010 (K. Attri)