IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1519 of 2010 MOHANALAL LOHIYA & ORS. Versus LALMUNI DEVI & ANR. ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kr. Pandey, Advocate ------ 3 08.09.2010 As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in limitation application. A limitation petition has been filed for condoning the delay of about 17 days in preferring the M.J.C. No. 1519 of 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and from the averments made in paragraph nos. 3 and 4, it appears that the petitioners were prevented by sufficient cause from preferring this M.J.C. application within time. In above view of the matter the limitation petition is allowed and the delay in filing of M.J.C. No. 1519 of 2010 is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider the M.J.C. No. 1519 of 2010 on its own merit. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2 This application has been filed for restoration of C.R. No. 1505/2007 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 19.2.2010. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the petitioners, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No. 1505/2007 is restored to its original file and number. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)