IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 3651 of 2007 SIYA DEVI, wife of Sri Chhedi Choudhary, Resident of Village-Fulkia, at present Bariarpur Bazar, P.S. Bariarpur, Distt. Munger… …Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 3. The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Munger, 5. The Treasury Officer, Munger, 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna… …Respondents with CWJC No. 5345 of 2007 VAIDEHI DEVI, wife of Late Naresh Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla-Sarvodaya, P.S. Begusarai, Distt. Begusarai… …Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 3. The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai, 5. The Treasury Officer, Begusarai, 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna… …Respondents with CWJC No. 6143 of 2007 KUNTI DEVI, wife of Late Sita Ram Sharma, Resident of Village-Kalyantola, P.S. Bariarpur, Distt.-Munger… …Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2 The Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 3 The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Bhagalpur, 5. The Treasury Officer, Bhagalpur, 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna… …Respondents 2 For the Petitioners : M/s Siya Ram Shahi & Ram Sewak (in all cases) Choudhary, Advocates. For the State : Mr.Birendra Kumar,AC to SC 12 (In CWJC Nos. 3651 and 6143 of 2007) For the State : Mr. Abinash Kumar, AC to GA 10 (In CWJC No. 5345 of 2007) For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. J.P. Karn, Sr. Advocate (In all cases) ----------- 4 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Since the facts of these writ applications are on similar flooting with the consent of the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Petitioners, in all the writ applications, seek directions to the authorities to fix their scales after grant of 2nd Time Bound Promotion from the dates described in paragraph 1 of all the three writ applications. In view of the stand taken in paragraph no. 9 of the counter affidavit filed in the year 2009 in C.W.J.C. No. 3651 of 2007 that necessary promotion orders will be issued soon after putting up the matters before the Education Establishment Committee, the State was directed to file fresh affidavit regarding the subsequent development. 3 However, despite adjournment granted twice to learned counsel for the State, no fresh affidavit could be filed. In above view of the matter, all these three writ applications are being disposed of with direction to the concerned District Superintendents of Education, Munger, Begusarai and Bhagalpur, to consider the grievances of the petitioners. If a fresh representation is filed along with a copy of this order by the concerned petitioner before the District Superintendent of Education concerned, the same should be considered and disposed of within three months on its own merit and in accordance with law and, in case, the decision is taken against the petitioner(s) then the order should be a reasoned one and in any case, a copy of the order should be communicated to the petitioner(s). SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)