1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 593/2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19/2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 708/2001 Latika Sharad Joshi and another .versus. Ravindra Vitthalrao Shrikhande - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Cou rt's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Bapat, counsel for respondent/applicant Mr. Bhangde, counsel for original applicants. CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 31 st AUGUST, 2010 This is an application by respondent for recalling of order dated 08.04.2009 passed by this Court rejecting Civil Application No. 19/2009 filed by the respondent/applicant for withdrawal of an amount of Rs.42,000/- deposited by revision applicant. 2] The order was passe don 8.4.2009. The application has been filed on 22nd April, 2010. It is not an application for review of the order. This Court has already decided the C.A. No. 19/2009 on its own merits. The application for recalling of 2 order is also not accompanied by the application for condonation of delay. 3] The learned counsel appearing for the applicant/respondent seeks permission to file additional affidavit in support of his plea that there is sufficient cause for not filing the application within a period of limitation. However, such request cannot be accepted. 4] In view of the fact that this Court has already passed an order on 8th April, 2009, there is no reason to recall the said order. The application is, therefore, rejected. 5] Shri Bhangde, learned counsel appearing for the review applicant in C.R.A., submits that the proceedings in the Civil Court itself have been withdrawn by the landlord. 6] In view of this, the revision application itself does not survive. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit