IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15096 of 2007 Between: 1 G.Manohar Kumar S/o Late Gopal Naik R/o H. No. 7-1-632/200 Bupunagar, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad 2 G. Mahender Kumar S/o Late Gopal Naik R/o H. No. 7-1-632/200 Bupunagar, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, P. S.Kushaiguda, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in interfering with the freedom and liberty and dary to day affairs of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 21 of Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 and his subordinate Police officials not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful living inany manner, and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper inthe circumstancesof the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15096 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Home for respondents. The petitioners allege that the 2nd respondent is unlawfully interfering with their liberties and is calling them to the police station asking them to bring the original documents pertaining to the property and at the instance of one Amarender Reddy, the 2nd respondent is doing so. The 2nd respondent has filed a counter affidavit denying the allegations of unlawful interference with the petitioners’ liberties and freedom. It is stated in the counter that on the basis of a complaint of one Amarender Reddy dated 17-03-2007 with regard to the fraudulent transaction in respect of plot No. 316 in survey Nos. 13 and 14, Valluvar Nagar, Ammuguda, crime No. 152 of 2007 has been registered under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC against four individuals (the petitioner is not included) and during investigation of this complaint certain persons were examined after notice is issued, but not the petitioner. To this counter filed on 04-09-2007 there is no affidavit in rebuttal by the petitioners. The petitioners therefore sub silentio accepts the averments of the counter affidavit. On the aforesaid analysis, the conclusion is legitimately compelling that the writ petition is filed without a justifiable cause. It is accordingly dismissed with costs of Rs.1,000-00 (Rupees one thousand only). ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 04-07-2008 Pvks/*