:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO.172 OF 2005 PETITION NO.172 OF 2005 PETITION NO.172 OF 2005 Bijesh Jamnadas Thakker . ...Petitioners vs. Rajdeep Realtors P.Ltd ...Respondents ------- Ms.Agnes Jiwani i/by.Thakore Jariwala & Co. for the petitioners. Mr.Kadam i/by.Kadam & Co. for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. 18th 18th 18th January, 2007. January, 2007. January, 2007. P.C P.C P.C :- :- :- 1. Both sides do not dispute that in a suit which has been filed against the respondent, a consent decree has been passed by this court. One of the terms in the consent terms is that the petitioner would not proceed to wind up the respondent company, as long as decreetal amount is paid and the decree is satisfied. In the light of this development, Company Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition as and when the occasion arises. sd/- :2: :2: :2: (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)