THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT APPEAL No.157 of 2011 JUDGMENT (per BPR,J): The appellant is the unsuccessful writ petitioner, who invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in W.P.No.13395 of 2002 seeking cancellation of appointment of the third respondent as Executive Officer of Santhoshimatha Temple, Safilguda by the proceedings dated 18.07.2002. The main ground on which the appointment of the third respondent was challenged was that the institution has not been notified under the provisions of Section 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short ‘the Act’) and therefore, there could not have been such appointment. Since Andhra Pradesh Gazette No.33, dated 15.08.2002 discloses that the said Temple has been notified and published under Section 6(c) (i) & (ii) of the Act, the learned Single Judge did not find favour of the petitioner’s contention and accordingly dismissed the writ petition by order dated 09.07.2010. Hence, this appeal. During the course of arguments, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the respondents have issued fresh orders on 05.03.2011 appointing the Executive Officer of the Temple. In view of the same, the order dated 18.07.2002 impugned in the writ petition needs to be set aside and the same is accordingly set aside. However, insofar as the fresh order dated 05.03.2011 is concerned, it amounts to fresh cause of action for the appellant. In the circumstances, the writ appeal is allowed only to the extent of setting aside the order dated 18.07.2002 impugned in the writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. B.PRAKASH RAO, J P. DURGA PRASAD, J Date: 16.03.2011 va