yf fe-1 -Qr^l i iOOOi 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W. P. N0. ^S35 /2005 y\ PETITIONEX<- ^/ ^<yy ^>'^p-"y •^^^ . ^'%^" ' ^y ^".^ ^- RESPONDENTS Harish Chandra Upadhyay S/o Shri Roop Narayan Upadhyay, aged about 60 years, R/o Gandhi Nagar, Ambikapur, Dist: Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^^'^ "Q" '_(f /..^ ^2. Director General of police, Head of Police Department, Raipur (C.G.). / 3. Superintendent of Police, Surguja at Ambikapur (C.G.). 4. Joint Director, Funds, Accounts 8& Pension, Bilaspur (C.G.). WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ '..^a ^wT -^WM^,ynlxi''!<s, 1^c!>TOy<< ^ HTTO?T^^T^ ^;£..^.P.;.^%^. ^§Tq^P (1IC?^C^) ^•t: . 3S 3TI^^T^T^lt^ ^srTOT^'^T^'m^ • Sarma IT^IT^^f^r^^T 11.07.2005^ Mr. Bhupendra Singh, learne<| Mr. Vivek Sharma, tearnec( Chhattisgarh. Learned counset for the petit) working as Constablewhen he retire^ The petitioner challenges his date o< Learned counsel forthe resp^ relief, the petitioner had filed earlier 2004. This Court vide order dated oner submits fhat the petitionerwas on superannuation on 30.09.2003. birth in this petition. >ndents submits that for the identical a writ petition i.e. W.P.No.1196 of 27.04.2004 (Annexure P-6) while disposing ofthe saidwrit petition, ofcjserved thatthe competent.authority will decide the representation ofthe petitioner as early as possibte, preft from the date of receipt of the repre According to the petitioner, authorities on 11.05.2004. The au<horities have decided the issue of payment of retiral benefits but the au| of date of birth. Now learned coun^ direction may be issued to the respo ofthe petitioner on the issue of date !n view ofthe above, the resp issue of date of birth ofthe petition^rwithin a period ofone month from the date of receipt of copy ofthis orc Even after decision, if any gi qTPTT^fl^ WTeyT'^'fe^t ^RSR ^srf^^sn^T counset for the petitioner. Panel Lawyer for the State of ^etitioner on having been filed bythe ^rably within a period oftwo months ^entation. :|ie representation was made to the thorities have not decided the issue ?el for the petitioner submits that a i^dents to decidethe representation jof birth expeditiously. tondents are directed to decide the ier. i^vance survives, the petitioner is at liberty to seek remedy under the taw.j tn view ofthe foregoing, the (^etition stands disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 ..y ^: