#30 20.12.2010 Present: Mr.M.P.S. Kasana along with Mr.B.K.Bharti, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person. Ms.Fizani Husain, APP for the State along with S.I. Rajender Singh, P.S. Prashant Vihar. Mr.Kuldeep Anand, Advocate for the respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. +Crl.M.C. No.3909/2010 1. This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No.48/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar on the complaint of respondent No.2. 2. Ground for quashing is that the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left them. 3. Both the parties confirm that they have amicably settled the matter in dispute and pursuant to the settlement, they have obtained consent divorce decree. It is stated by the parties that as per the terms of settlement, copy of which is placed on record as Gompromise Deed, the petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of ?5,00,000/- to respondent No.2, out of which ?4,00,000/- has already been paid and balance ?1,00,000/- is paid today, vide Bankers cheque No.566012 dated 9.11.2010 for ?1,00,000/- drawn at State Bank of India, Azad Pur. 4. Both the parties submit that they have signed the original of the Compromise Deed and placed the same on record in token of their having settled the matter. A Signing Date:05.08.2024 16:58:50 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified V 5. Respondent No.2 states that she has settled the matter with the petitioner of her own accord without any inducement or threat and now there is no dispute left between the parties and that she does not want any action against the petitioner and that she has no objection if the FIR No.48/2010 registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar and the proceedings arising out the same are quashed. 6. Ms.Fizani Husain, learned APR for the State submits that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, there is no purpose of continuing with the investigation of the case and the State has no objection to the quashing of the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same. 7. Since the parties have arrived at a settlement and now there is no dispute left, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the matter alive and prosecuting the petitioner. Accordingly FIR No.48/2010 registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 8. Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement. 9. Petition stands disposed of. DECEMBER 20, 2010 (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE