... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1063 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1063 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1063 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.781 OF 2006 FROM ORDER NO.781 OF 2006 FROM ORDER NO.781 OF 2006 .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri Rakesh M. Pandey for the Applicant. Shri R.A.Yadav for the Respondent No.6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : MAY 04, 2007. : MAY 04, 2007. : MAY 04, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the Applicant and the sixth Respondent. As per the impugned order the sixth Respondent has already reconstructed the structure. The limited prayer in this Application is that the sixth Respondent should not be allowed to occupy the structure. Such a prayer cannot be granted after the sixth Respondent has occupied the suit structure. It is obvious that occupation of the sixth Respondent of the reconstructed structure will be subject to final outcome of the Appeal. Subject to what is stated above, Civil Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE