WP(C) 3211/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The matter relates to seniority dispute between the petitioner and the r espondent Nos. 5 and 6 as Additional Mondal in the District of Dhubri. According to the petitioner he is senior to the said two respondents. Heard Mr. D.A. Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. U.K. Nair, learned Standing counsel, DLR. I have also heard Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. Since the matter involves disputed question of facts, I am of the consid ered opinion that ends of justice would be met if a direction is issued to the D eputy Commissioner, Dhubri District who is the appropriate authority to take on record the Annexure -5 representation dated 24.05.2010 in which the petitioner h as raised his grievance as has been raised in the writ petition and shall decid e the same upon hearing all the parties involved. The petitioner may obtain the certified copy of this order and produce the same before the Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri alongwith a copy of the writ petition and on receipt of the same, the said Deputy Commissioner may dispose of the represe ntation in accordance with law after hearing all the parties. Entire exercise s hall be carried out as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months fr om the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order alognwith a copy of t he writ petition and its enclosures. Since the particular exercise is now required to be carried out by the D eputy Commissioner, Dhubri needless to say that any absorption made in the regul ar post of Mondal during the pendency of the representation, same will be subjec t to the outcome of the same.