1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1941 of 07 Sumitra v. EO and ors ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------- Mr A. Shelat, Advocate for petitioner Mr G. Mishra, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr P.D. Kothari, AGP for respondent no.2. Coram : D.K. Deshmukh and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 17.9.2007 Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 states that the respondent no.1 is willing to reconsider the order dated 13.2.2004 in view of the order of the Tribunal dated 30.11.2005 and fresh decision will be taken and communicated to the petitioner. He also states that an opportunity of being heard will be afforded to the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 further states that respondent no. 1 will complete the process as expeditiously as possible, at 2 any rate, within a period of eight weeks from today. In our opinion, in view of this statement, grievance of the petitioner does not survive. Petition disposed of accordingly. Judge. Judge. hsj