IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6788 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:15.09.2011 Virender Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Kewal Krishan Makkar ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Gagan Oberoi, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the respondent. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) Sh. Gagan Oberoi, Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioner, on instructions from Sh.Virender Kumar-petitioner, who is present in the Court, states that the civil revision petition be dismissed as not pressed as the parties have compromised. Sh. Krishan Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent, on instructions from Sh.Kewal Krishan Kumar-respondent, who is also present in the Court, does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the compromise having been effected between the parties, this petition is ordered to be dismissed as having become infructuous. September 15, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE