AB 2053/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. C. Baruah, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. B. Baruah, Advocate appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. P.P., Assa m. Smti. Manju Begum is the wife of the petitioner No.1, She filed an FIR w ith the Officer-in-Charge of Ghoramara Police Station alleging inter-alia that s he is mentally and physically tortured by the petitioners on account of her fail ure to satisfy their demand. Accordingly, Lahowal P.S. Case No.73 of 2011 was re gistered and investigated into. The petitioners herein apprehending their arrest in connection with the aforesaid case have filed this petition under Section 43 8 CrPC for privilege of pre-arrest bail in view of the facts and the grounds con tended in the petition. From the first information report, it appears to us that after the marriage with petitioner No.1, she had been mentally tortured on acco unt of her failure to satisfy their demand. She was also driven out by the petit ioners with a condition that she might come back to their house if she could sat isfy their demand. Accordingly, on 25.5.2011 when she came to her matrimonial ho me, she was again assaulted and mentally tortured for not fulfilling their deman d. Mr. C. Baruah, learned senior counsel in support of the application, con tends that the allegation of demand of dowry made by the first informant in the first information report is false and fabricated and at no point of time she had been tortured for dowry. In view of the submissions advanced by Mr. Baruah, learned senior counse l, we are constrained to make the survey of the materials available in the case diary wherefrom it appears that the first informant has been mentally and physic ally tortured on account of failure to pay the dowry as claimed by them. However, Mr. C. Baruah, learned senior counsel by bringing the Annexure- D to this petition to the notice of this Court submits that the allegation of to rture by her husband and in-laws are false, fabricated and manipulated. She is b eing divorced on 8.5.0211. On account of divorce on 8.5.2011, there was no reaso n for her to come to her matrimonial home on 23.5.2011. It is also submitted by Mr. Baruah that she acknowledged the Annexure-D on the same day i.e. on 8.5.2011 . The facts situation, Mr. C. Baruah, learned senior counsel prays to abso lute the interim order provided on 12.7.2011. The facts and the materials having been meticulously gone through, we fi nd force in the submissions of Mr. C. Baruah, learned senior counsel. Accordingl y, we would not be hesitant to order the interim provided on 12.7.2011 absolute. It is accordingly done so. The bail application stands disposed of.