ot^ (9 IN THE HTGH COURT OP JUDICATURE BTLASPUR, CHHATTI.S.GARti P. No.^-186/03 ^ P2TITIONER w»] Jayant Kumar Parkar S/o Let Sri G» R» Parkar aged about 24 year •village and post Rajim, Thanapara, Disto Raipur (C»G^) VS RS U S RESPOND^TS t ^' .-^" •••::^'^^' s? ,e'<vl^ ^^.\f- 'a"-^- !• State of Chhattisgarh Through $- Its Secretory Scheciule Tribs/ Schedule Cost/ Other Backward Class & Minority^ Developnent Deptt* D^^S^ BhaxAran, Ralpur (C^G-) ^2- Assitant Commissioner Triba.1 Development Department Dantewada, Distt» Dantewada 3^ Block Education Officer Tribel Deveiopment Department ''Chhindaarh, Distt* Dantewada PETITI ON UNDER ARnCLE , 226/227p^THE_'^^TITUTIOK,_OF^J:ND.IA ntair— ff?----— r- XI-MC-22 3.T^7r^{ K7[T^ .H^T ^^^^ '3=[T^T c^ .^ ^s[ •^PT|^R. i^WH'4^. f^^rey 3TT^T T^T^ TSl^c(ll ^^^•; '•---••--•'•-*--•v^ ^^ 'f^<£T' ^ "* 1 mfa'^g,4g>^;< 22-12-2005 Petitioner by Shri 5. f . ^-^^4fi- Shri Vivek Sharma, Panet LawyerJ Heard. This case relatesJx) compassional emptoyee sen/ing in the State. Learned counsel for the petitionerj categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1 - in batch of cases bearing W.P. No.1322/; passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He ^rays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. Learned counsel for the State doe^ of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision employees who died on or after 1/11/199|7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at thattime. In view of the submissions mac)1 without expressing any opinion on the m^ including filing ofthe petition before this (Rourt. With the aforesaid observations, t^is petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for comptiance. ^ Advocate. for the State. e appointment consequent upon the death of an 1-1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that 002 involving the same question orders have been not dispute the above fact and state that the State to consider the cases of dependants of those |e by learned counset appeanng for the parties, Irits ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice will be sen/ed if a direction is g1v^n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner in accordance with the poiicy prevalent at the time of death of the em^loyee concerned. If the pefrttioner found eligible, appointment orders witl.be issued as ea| petitioner is also directed to renderdue c^ any grievance still remains, the' petitior^ th. !y as possible on or before 30"' April,.20Q6. The >-operation to the authorities. tt ismade clear that if ?r may avail the remedy available under the law wil! be obliged to communicate the order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [-(ira <i^4 •ym