IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.243 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Dhyan Singh ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: 8th March, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.02/2010 Under Sections 498A, 452, 323, 504, 506 of IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Revenue Police Station Silari, District Tehri Garhwal ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant as well as Sri Nandan Arya, AGA for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR are general in nature. He further argued that the applicant has never demanded dowry from the complainant. It is further argued that the co-accused Bahuran Singh has been granted bail by the Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal vide order dated 5.2.2010. It is pleaded that the applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 28.01.2010. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Dhyan Singh released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tehri Garhwal. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 08.03.2010 RG