IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24548 of 2011 Gopal Prasad Agrawal @ Gopal Prasad, son of late Ramji Lal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 11.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Considering the nature of allegation that only 32 bags bearing the mark of F.C.I was found in the godown of the petitioner and the submission that such bags are evidently available in the market, let the petitioner who has fair antecedents, in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 68 of 2011, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit 2 shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)