IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3033 of 2006 RIZWAN KHAN Son of late Phool Mohammad, resident of Village, Semari, P.S., M.H.Nagar(Daraunda)Dist-Siwan………… Petitioiner Versus (1) STATE OF BIHAR (2) Sheikh Khalid son of late Mazid (3) Guddy @ Sarfaraz son of late Sheikh Abdul (4) Nashim son of Hamuddin (5) Sheikh Naushad son of Abdul Haque (6) Sheikh Sadique son of Mahiuddin (7) Ali Afsar son of Mahiuddin, all residents of Village-Semari, PS, M.H.Nagar (Daraunda),Dist-Siwan………… O.P. ----------- For petitioner:- Mr. U.K. Mishra, Advocate For State:- None. 2/ 15-Oct-08 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner who is informant of a criminal case submits that while transferring the criminal case from Siwan to Gopalganj this Court directed for expediting the trial but the same was not done. This Court is not persuaded to interfere in the matter in exercise of contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is therefore disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner that if so required he may move the concerned court for expediting the case and for redressal of his grievance. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)