1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13/06/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.5272 of 2011 R.Pandiarajan ... Petitioner Vs The Commissioner of Police Inspector General of Police Tirunelveli City Tirunelveli. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in connection with the impugned order of suspension passed by him in his proceedings in C.No.K1/15516/2008 CPO 356/08 dated 06.06.2008 and consequential rejection order passed in C.No.K1/P.R.01/2009 dated 04.06.2010 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary an consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all service and monetary benefits within the time limit that may be stipulated by this court. For petitioner ...Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents ...Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Addl. Government Pleader O R D E R Even though the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition challenging the order of suspension dated 06.06.2008 as well as the order dated 04.06.2010 rejecting the request of the petitioner for revoking the order of suspension, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that in view of the fact that the order of suspension was passed on 06.06.2008, three years back and that even the request of the petitioner for revoking the order of suspension was rejected on 04.06.2010, i.e. one year back, the petitioner could be permitted to submit a representation now setting out that the petitioner is kept under long suspension and that a criminal case has not seen the light of the day, the same could be directed to be considered by the respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Taking into account, the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I direct the petitioner to send a detailed representation for revoking the order of suspension to the respondent within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders by considering all the relevant point taken by the petitioner in the writ petition. The said exercise has to be carried out by the respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. The Writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Acounts) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Commissioner of Police Inspector General of Police Tirunelveli City Tirunelveli. +1 CC to the Additional Government Pleader, Sr.No.18292 RR W.P.(MD)No.5272 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 and 2 of 2011 13.06.2011 TR : 21.06.2011 : 2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/