f-5 CTsl^g ^B ^&^In{C .^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION {0 N0. /4^ /200^- PETITIONER ^sP" Jitendra Kumar Tamrakar, aged about 22 years, S/0 Shri B.P. Tamrakar, R/o E-l,Mungeli Naka, , Tamrakar, K/o li;-l,Mungc .''•i'\cc-i<" ..••"'' Bilaspur, District Bilaspiir [C.G.]. 7:-£^^~ •••"cS^"^.'15"" VERSUS y^ tS^ .s" ^^I^PONDENTS :- ^lf State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare/Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] Giun Ghasidas University, through- Registrar, University Campus, Koni, BUaspur [C.G.]. <k 3] Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Science, Through- its Dean, Pratap Chowk, Bilaspur [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION IWDER ARTICLE a«/^7OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTTPETmON (C) No. 147 of2007 Jitendra Kumar Tanuakar VERSUS RESPONDENTS : • State ofChhaftisgarh & Othea-s And WSrr nTIONUNDERAR'nCI£226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Sattsh K. AsnBiotei. J. Present: Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERfORAU (Passed on 10th day of August, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petiUoner submits that in vjiew oftheE retum filed by the respoadents/State, nothing survives n Ifais petition for adjudication at this stage and the petition has become infi'uctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for ofher side does not contoovert Ihe above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is discrissed as having beeome inJructuous. r ~ ~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri