IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No.672 of 2010 Date of Decision:9.8.2011 Ajit Singh .... Appellant Versus Lashkar Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia Present: Mr. Anish Setia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.(Oral) The present regular second appeal has been filed by Ajit Singh defendant No.1 to the suit. Lashkar Singh respondent No.1-plaintiff had instituted a suit for permanent injunction restraining Ajit Singh and his two sons namely Jasbir Singh and Sukhbir Singh not to block/stop or obstruct flow of water to the fields of respondent-plaintiff from the Bore of the Tubewell existing in the suit land. Detail and Description of the suit property has been mentioned in the head not of the plaint. Today, Ajit Singh is present in the Court. His statement has been recorded separately. The same be read as part of this order. Ajit Singh has stated in his statement that he will not block or obstruct flow of water from the Bore of the Tubewell in the suit land and he will facilitate irrigation of the fields in possession of the plaintiff. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate, counsel for respondent No.1 states that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the statement made by Ajit Singh. Mr. Setia also has made similar prayer. Ordered accordingly. 09.08.2011 ( Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) rajeev Judge