IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.8004 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.12.2011 Amrit Lal Prashar -----Petitioner Vs. Kusam Gupta -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. 1. This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the impugned order of eviction passed by the authorities below on the ground that the same is required by the respondent-landlady for her bona fide needs. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted before this Court that instead of challenging the findings of the authorities below, the petitioner will be satisfied if he is granted time to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady upto 31.8.2012. C.R. No.8004 of 2011 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner shall make the payment of arrears, if any, within two months from today and shall keep on paying the future rent by 10th of every month till the date of handing over of the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner shall also file an undertaking before the Rent Controller to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises as stipulated above within one month from today. 4. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is dismissed and orders of the authorities below ordering eviction of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises are upheld. However, the petitioner is granted time upto 31.8.2012 to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady, subject to the condition of making payment of arrears of rent, if any, within two months from today, and that the petitioner shall keep on paying the future rent in advance by the 10th of every month and further that he will file an undertaking before the executing Court within one month from today that he will hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady on or before the expiry of the time granted by this Court i.e. 31.8.2012. 2 C.R. No.8004 of 2011 5. The petitioner shall be bound by the submissions made before this Court on his behalf. It is also clarified that in case of any violation of the aforesaid conditions, the eviction order shall come into force immediately. It is also made clear that in case the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlady, as stipulated above, the respondent- landlady may initiate contempt proceedings against him, in addition to execution of the impugned order. December 22, 2011 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ak JUDGE 3