SBCWP NO.7830/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7830/2009. Sunil Kumar Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order:- July 10, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Sushil Pujari on behalf of Shri Arvind Kumar Gupta for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT:- Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner was initially appointed on 22/5/1986 on the post of Lower Division Clerk in the Department of State Insurance and Provident Fund on daily wage basis. His services were abruptly terminated by the government order dated 29/2/1988. At his instance, industrial dispute was raised and the Labour Court vide award dated 2/1/1992 held the termination of the petitioner as illegal and accordingly issued directions for his reinstatement in service with continuity with 50% back wages. Writ petition filed by the respondent-State against the aforestated award being SBCWP No.2352/1993 was dismissed vide judgment of this SBCWP NO.7830/09. 2 court dated 9/9/12005. Petitioner was thereafter not permitted to rejoin the duties. Petitioner was initially appointed in the year 1986, he has completed more than 22 years of service with the respondents. He served upon the respondents legal notice for demand of justice saying that his services be regularised. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment of Apex Court in Secretary of State Karnataka Vs. Umadevi and ors. : AIR 2006 SC 1806 and also relied on the Circular of the State Government dated 23/6/2007 issued on that basis. Government has recently taken a policy decision to regularise the services of such ad hoc/temporary/ daily wage employees who have worked with them for more than 10 years in terms of para 53 of the aforesaid judgment. Having regard to the facts of the case, inspite of directly entertaining this writ petition, I require the petitioner to make representation to the Director State Insurance and Provident Fund Department who shall consider and decide the same keeping in view the judgment of Smt.Uma Devi supra and the policy decision recently taken by the government within a period of three months from the date of decision. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil