1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.560 OF 1994. Namdeo Vithobaji Bhange .vs. Zilla Parishad, Wardha, through its C.E.O. and others. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. Miss P.S.Laplikar, Adv. holding for Adv.P.D.Meghe, for respondent no.1. Coram: ANOOP V. MOHTA and C. L. PANGARKAR, JJ. Dated : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2008. None appeared for the petitioner again. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 has pointed out an additional submission dated 20/8/2008 based upon the return already filed on record. Para nos.2,3,4 and 5 of the additional submission are reproduced as under - 2 2. It is respectfully submitted that the present respondent vide its order dated 26/8/1994 condoned the said break. Copy of the said order is annexed herewith as Annexure-R1/A. 3. It is further submitted that this respondent paid difference of gratuity and pension amounting to Rs.18,296/- on the basis of said order on 31/3/1005 and petitioner also issued receipt to that effect. The copy of said receipt dt. 31/3/1995 is annexed herewith as Annexure-R1/B. 4. It is further submitted that this respondent again paid Rs.2,552/- to petitioner on 4/1/1996 towards difference of pension for the period of 1/1/1995 to 30/9/1995 and petitioner signed a receipt. The copy of the said receipt is annexed herewith as Annexure R1/C. 5. Similarly, the petitioner also received an amount of Rs.6909.60 on 3 7/10/1994 towards arrears of salary. The copy of said receipt is annexed herewith as Annexure R1/D. Thus there is nothing to be paid to the petitioner as petitioner received all the benefits claimed in this petition. In view of said documents filed on record, nothing survives in the petition. Hence, same may kindly be disposed off. In view of this, there is nothing survived in the petition, as the respondents have considered and granted benefits as claimed in the petition. The present petition is, therefore, disposed of. JUDGE. JUDGE. chute 4