IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9331 OF 2005 Smt.Sushila Annasaheb Patil & ors. Petitioners versus Balasaheb Annasaheb Patil & ors. Respondents Mr.S.D.Patil for petitioners. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd January 2006 PC : 1. Heard Shri Patil for the petitioner. It is not necessary to entertain this petition because of the observation of the Lower Appellate Court that the Applications Exhibits 92 and 97 in Regular Appeal No.4 of 2005 would be considered along with appeal itself. Needless to state that all observations made in the impugned order would not influence the Lower Appellate Court when the petitioners raise appropriate contentions on merits of the case. Further needless to add that in the light of the findings of the Lower Appellate Court, the contentions be dealt with uninfluenced by observations made in the impugned order. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)