IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.2127 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.01.2011 Uma Soni ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Ashok Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that in view of the Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment Act 2008 in Section 372 appeal against the acquittal is maintainable by the complainant-victim. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has no objection in it. Present petition is allowed. Order dated 22.5.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, is set aside. Revisionist is directed to appear before learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon on 10.2.2011. On that day, learned Sessions Judge shall either hear the appeal for admission or shall fix any date for the purpose of admission. (Alok Singh) Judge January 27, 2011 R.S.