RFANo.95 of 2010 (O&M) 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. RFA No. 95 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on 30.8.2010. State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, Panchkula --Appellant Vs. Maharana Partap Rajpoot Welfare Society (Regd) Yamuna Nagar --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Anjum Ahmad,Addl.A.G.Haryana, for the appellant None for the respondent Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) This order shall dispose of five appeals bearing. R.F.A.No. 95 of 2010 (O&M) (State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, Panchkula Vs. Maharana Partap Rajpoot Welfare Society (Regd); R.F.A.No. 96 of 2010 (O&M) (State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, HUDA, Panchkula Vs. Ram Bhaj and others); R.F.A.No. 97 of 2010 (O&M) (State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, HUDA, Panchkula Vs. Inder Sharma); R.F.A.No. 98 of 2010 (O&M) (State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, HUDA, Panchkula Vs. Narinder and R.F.A. No.317 of 2010 (O&M) (State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, Panchkula Vs. Jaspal and others, as a RFANo.95 of 2010 (O&M) 2 common question of law is involved in these appeals, therefore, these are being disposed of by a common order recorded in R.F.A.No. 95 of 2010 (O&M) (State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, Panchkula Vs. Maharana Partap Rajpoot Welfare Society (Regd). Brief facts of the case are that vide notification dated 28.8.2001, issued under Section 4 of the land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act), followed by a notification dated 30.8.2001 issued under Section 6 of the Act, land measuring 2.06 acres of Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, was acquired for a public purpose, namely for development and utilization of land for construction of road in Sector 18,Part-II, Jagadhri. The Land Acquisition Collector, (for short,the Collector) vide his award No.13 dated 27.3.2002 awarded the compensation of the acquired land @ Rs.6,00,000/- per acre . Unsatisfied, the landowners preferred objections under Sections 18 of the Act against the award passed by the Collector, before the Civil Court for adjudication, where the compensation has been enhanced vide impugned order dated 23.4.2007 to the tune of Rs.11,32,800/- along-with all the statutory benefits as per the provisions of the Amended Act. Learned counsel for the appellant has brought to the notice of this Court a decision of this Court in a bunch of 51 cases rendered in the main RFA No.6 of 2008 titled as State of Haryana Vs. Seema Rani and others decided on 8.12.2008, which pertains to the acquisition of 60.94 acres of land situated in village Gobindpura, Tehsil and District Yamuna Nagar for the same construction of road in Sector 18 Part-II, Jagadhri, vide notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 (for short,the Act), dated 28.8.2001 followed by a notification issued under RFANo.95 of 2010 (O&M) 3 Section 6 of the Act dated 30.8.2001, where the Collector had awarded compensation @ Rs.6,00,000/-per acre of the acquired land which was further enhanced by the learned District Judge, Yamuna Nagar to the tune of Rs.11,32,800/- per acre . Both the landowners as well as the State of Haryana were still not satisfied with the award of the learned District Judge,Yamuna Nagar therefore the appeals were filed before this Court. The appeals filed by the landowners were allowed only to the extent that for a depth of 100 meters on Jagadhri- Yamuna Nagar bye-pass, the value of the land was assesses @ Rs.2000/- per square meter whereas the appeals filed by the State of Haryana were dismissed . As a matter of fact, the present appeals are also covered by a decision in the bunch of cases rendered in main RFA No.6 of 2008 State of Haryana Vs.Seema Rani and others decided on 8.12.2008. Learned counsel for the appellants could not point out any error in the order of the Court below for the purpose of reducing the compensation. In view thereof, all the appeals are hereby dismissed in limine. 30.8.2010 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge