1 wp 8187.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8187 OF 2011 Eknath Santukrao Patil .. Petitioner Versus The Deputy Commissioner (Supply), Aurangabad Division and others .. Respondents Shri P. S. Dighe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri P. P. More, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. Shri M. L. Dharashive, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 18TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Shri Dharashive, the learned counsel raises a preliminary objection and submits that an alternate remedy is available under Clause 24 of the Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities (Regulations of Distribution) Order 1975. Shri Dighe, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the impugned order is passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. The directions of this Court while remanding the matter were not followed and even the documents were not supplied. All these 2 wp 8187.11 factors can be taken into consideration by the State Government, where the revision can be filed. 2. In view of the alternate remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition and I dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under Clause 24 of the above referred Order. Shri Dharashive, the learned counsel states that an alternate arrangement is made. Shri Dighe, the learned counsel submits that no such arrangement has been made. The parties shall maintain status quo for a period of 15 days from today, so as to enable the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 11