IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25013 of 2004 Between: 1 Smt. Mamidi Sobharani, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, 4th Ward, Amadalavalasa Municipality r/o. Bodepallipeta, Amadalavalasa, Srikakulam District. 2 B. Jagannadha Rao, S/o. B. Krishna Rao, 7th Ward r/o 7-2-193, Amaoalavalasa, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 State of A.P. rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Chief Commissioner Land Administration, Govt. of A.P. Hyderabad. 3 Director of Collegiate Education, Govt. of A.P. Hyderabad. 4 Amadalavalasa Municipality, Rep by its Commissioner, Amadalavalasa. 5 District Collector, Srikakulam District. 6 Principal, Government Degree College, Amadalavalasa .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in shifting the Government Degree College to the new premises at Kanakadri Tank Bed, without obtaining Municipal sanction and contrary to the A.P. Education ct as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to construct a building at Mettakivalasa as proposed by the 4th respondent at the cost of the 4th respondent and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.VISWANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1to3.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R : When this writ petition came up for hearing on 24.06.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and therefore, it was directed to be listed on 26.06.2009 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:26th June, 2009. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}