1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 369 OF 2009 Kamla Enterprises .... Petitioner vs Mehboob Sheikh Jafar .... Respondent Mr. P. Patel i/b. Mr. Rajiv Narula i/b.M/s.Jhangiani Narula & Associates for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Rochiramani i/b. M/s. Bhaskar & Co. for the respondents. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 16th July, 2009 P.C.: 1 In a Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act), as there is an agreement of arbitration, parties have decided to refer the matter to the Arbitrator. However, they have agreed for interim arrangements as per the Minutes of Order dated 16.07.2009, marked “X”. The same is signed by the parties as well as their respective Advocates. The statement is made that it is well within the frame work of law and the record and there is no third party involved. The parties are present in the Court also. 2 In view of this, the present Arbitration Petition is disposed of in terms of Minutes of Order dated 16.07.2009. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)