A^l^ HI&H COUKT OF CHHATTISeARH. BILASPUf W.P.(CrtNo.7030/2009 er Art-icle Z2o of th®Constitution of .India] P.K. Sharma, 5/0 Rawraffl Shsrmo. Exscutive /~U^£;-.——iS^.^^—^4.1.. —.^ u.i-;^.— :— /.—A..-^.-.—..—„-: ^"TTiCST"^ FPSSSf'Tiy w'Or^lfiy '!i1 -"i HTy'0""y53V3€Ty: Cooperative, Fincince and DevelopiTient, Bilgspur, a^^u af'out o^ y'^^,- K/o G;' Oistrict Ra.jnandqcion iC@] ^-^-1 .-,1—..,+C;'5 .,^,- !&/- /':":i I ;—- 16-»:^,_*.-,-i-..— s-t^^Q uuc.'yi ^fe., yr;?., ^./u 'w'viE .p-irfKSt, "s.'^.;:;^?Eu^uun, •^ - ••• . .- .. - — ^ f - ' - . . . . . . J . ...^- ^ . ^ 1. C'Hi li^TTi5£i€iti^H re nr,r>'a'»ywasay'i C:—.— — - Jt i*v-.^^<.{—u.——8- ITiS4Ft^;*S "^f3U '^*%VKiUy-?i%ii E uorp&r •4-. Ua'-'%€/jv?= D/if^S:" —^•^- ur, TKrouqn iTS mana<3inq 2. Collector-cuni-Pr'esia'ent, Distriet *^ HTy€^?y^Tvu5tTy1 <-OC'pKr€TT!V©^ rinsiHCS Ci'rlO Deveiopment Corporation, Durq. o ei...t~.~-.i—*-s—^-—*--^^~-Ai^x- ?Si.—/^^ ^?L°p~SriHTSHSiS?iT OT F'OiiC®,UUr^^, ^».@;, •~®sent; s ^s' Mr. 1 .K. 1 iwar', AOvocate A .^. .._ f__ -/b-_-_;_-_--__—^*_»--___-•- /V". /trun jao, c'cvernmsnT *idvoccTe ror the oetitioner. Tn-s rs.Sooncisn' f\ f^ A -?~t e^ »s c: d on 01 2i Bv tiiis inrfit oetition 1tie oetitioner is orayina for direction to resoondent No.l to eonsider the ietter of Annexure P-7 duted 15.9.2009 and further direction to the resoondent No.4 to make enauir'v as oer directions issued bv this Court and not to fiie charae sheet. 2. Briefiv stated. 'f-acts ot the c&se are that the oetitioner wus working as Executive Orficer under the resoondents No.l d 2. TTie Sub Divisionaj MuaiStrats. Dura on the basis ot reDort of the Naib iehsildar. Dut'a. on comulaint by one Ashok Baade. conducted enuuiry and submitted enquiry reoort that the oetitjoner arid other two persons ha»<a preoared loati cases in' a uianned manner bv tabricatina seais arid aiqnatures or the NaJb Tehsildar & the Sariitari/ InsDector and therebv at'temDted tu comniit serious economic offence. In rhese cir'cumstances. it wus rscommended thut criminal case be ceqistered aaainst thsm and di.sciulinary Drocesdinas should aiso be initiated. . ,.- - ^^ya^ ^^Es» Ths oetitioner und one S.P. 5harma fiied writ ostition bearinq W.P. (Cr.i No.7100/08 ror auashina of the comDlaint dated 5.1.2006, however. ths same was dismisssd with an observation that a case has t-een made out •ro initiate criirsinai case aaainst the oetitioners. While disi'i'iissinci the Detition it was further observed that the uetitioner's rsav r&iss objectiOns durinu inveatiaation or Itiereafter. if so udvised. The oetitioner herein filed another writ Detition bearinq W.P. iCr.i No.2627709 Oi-id the same waus disDosed of nith a direction ftiat if no action is 'taken 0.1 rhe letter (Annexure P-7). Jt is exoediem' that ths responstent No.l may hear the oetitioner bef'ore takina any decision on 4. W.r. Tiwari. iearned counsei ror the oetitioner submil's that arter pcssiriq of the above order or Annexure P-5. the Detitioner submit'ted ."eDresentation cla'ted 22.10.2009 (Annexure P-6i before -rfie resoondent No.l, however, instead of decidina the reoresentation. the resDondent No.2 forwarded the same to the Coliec'ror. He further .submits rhat in the nieanwhiie 'i'he respondents concerned are contempiatinq to fiie charae shest aoainst the Detitioner. 5. rrom oerusai of the order dated 5.1.2009 {Annexure P-4) it is elear that the petitioners writ oetition for auashina of 'i1ie comDiuint has been diSiriissed with an observation that Drima facie a case has been made out ro initiate: criminai case against the petitioner. 3. Xn yiew or the above order. the resoondents cannot be restrained rrom fiiina charae sheet aciainst the oetitioner. 7. Accordinaiy. the instant oetn'ion 'iS without anv substance. the sarne d&se'cve.s ro be dismissed and it is, accordinaiv. disniiSsed. ..---"" \- s^^ta ^^