IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5017 of 2010 Date of Decision: 11.08.2010 Gurwinder Kaur .……Petitioner Versus Sudhneet Singh ……Respondent Coram:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been instituted by Gurwinder Kaur for directing the Guardian Judge to expeditiously dispose of the guardian case instituted by her against respondent-husband for custody of the minor child. Perusal of the zimini orders reproduced in the revision petition reveals that the petitioner herself is at fault for the delay in the disposal of the case because on large number of dates of hearing fixed for her evidence, she did not produce her evidence. Consequently, it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to plead before this Court to direct the Guardian Judge for expeditious disposal of the case, when the petitioner herself is delaying the disposal of the case by not leading her evidence. Having said as aforesaid, the Guardian Judge is directed to dispose of the guardian case in question as expeditiously as may be practicable keeping in view the docket of the Court. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. 11.08.2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) A. Kaundal JUDGE