IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 478 of 2004 (M/B) Riayast s/o Hamid R/o Village Todakalayanpur, Pargana and Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar …… Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Collector, Haridwar. 2. District Panchayat Raj Officer, District Haridwar. 3. Jaipal Singh s/o Manfool Singh, R/o Village Todakalayanpur, Pargana and Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar ….. Respondents ……. None for the petitioner. Mr. N.C.Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 & 2. None for respondent 2 and 3. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 25.04.2006 25.04.2006 A