IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19753 of 2008 KRISHNA KANT SRIVASTAVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for the offence under sections 406 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the informant has lodged the present case for ulterior purpose. It would be evident on perusal of the document contained in annexures 3 and 6 to the effect that the vehicle was purchased from the informant after receiving no objection certificate signed by the informant as well as by the leasing company, who had financed for purchase of vehicle in question. The petitioner has also brought on record a copy of the money receipt as contained in annexures-7 and 7/1 towards payment of price of the vehicle. As such, the allegation that the petitioner was driver of the informant and fled away is totally incorrect. Considering the above, it is directed that the petitioner, Krishna Kant Srivastava, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabd P.S.Case No.8 of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)