IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3140 of 2009 1. DINESH PRASAD SAH 2. LAKHO DEVI W/O LATE JHULAN SAH 3. KAILASH PRASAD @ KAILASH PRASAD SAH 4. TUNTUN PRASAD @ TUNTUN PRASAD SAH 5. ANSHU KUMAR @ ANSHU PRASAD SAH ALL 3 TO 5 S/O LATE JHULAN SAH 6. ANJU @ RANJU DEVI @ RANJU W/O TUNTUN SAH Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAMTA DEVI, D/O ASHOK PRASAD SAH ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 12.9.2008 by learned S.D.J.M. Naugachhiya in case bearing Naugachhiya P.S. Case No. 138 of 2008 by which he has taken cognizance under Section 498 (A)/34 and ¾ of the D/P Act., disagreeing with the final report. The informant had filed the present case against her in-laws stating therein that she was married to petitioner no. 1 on 10.12.2001 but thereafter she was tortured by her in-laws in various ways. She has specifically stated the manner in which each of the accused persons had participated in torturing her despite which the police after investigation submitted final report disagreeing with the version of the informant. I find no illegality and therefore there is no reason to interfere in the matter. In view of such, this application is dismissed. Fahad. (Anjana Prakash, J)