CLCON No. 54 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Sri Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri B.D.Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondents. As per the submission raised by learned counsel for the Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. – Sri B.D. Upadhyay, the representation was made by one Sri Prem Ram, which created confusion in the Department, as there was no person ever employed with the name of Prem Ram in the Power Department. Although the submission raised by learned counsel for the respondents appear to be hyper technical, but even in the interest of justice, I think that it would be proper that petitioner Prem Lal S/o Dhumoo Lal be directed to move the representation with the correct name of Prem Lal before the Department concerned within a period of 15 days and thereafter, the Department shall consider the representation and decide the same within 15 days. In case, the representation of the petitioner – Prem Lal is not decided within a period of one moth from the date of filing the representation by the petitioner before the Department concerned, then the petitioner shall have afresh cause of action to file the contempt petition before this Court. However, at this stage, I do not find any justification to continue the contempt proceedings against the respondents furthermore. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. The notices issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C.K., J.) 30.07.2009 ASWAL