IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 26297 of 2010 Date of decision:24.9.2010 Sarabjit Kaur Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. NS Sodhi, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner is married sister-in-law of complainant Ramanjit Kaur, who is daughter of Roop Singh, posted as DSP Vigilance, Sangrur. It is contended that no specific allegation or specific attribution was there against the petitioner. Neither any overt act is attributed nor any article was entrusted to her, as per the allegations in the FIR. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the contents of the FIR. Prima faice the allegations against the petitioner appear to be vague and uncertain and do not constitute any offence of misappropriation. Learned counsel submits that the case is fixed for consideration of charges. After considering the arguments of counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can always be discharged by the trial court on consideration of the nature of the allegations and the prima facie evidence gathered while considering the case for framing of charges. With liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas and seek an order of discharge on the basis of the material, forming part of report u/s 173(2) Cr.P.C. the petition is disposed of as pre-mature at this stage. September 24 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE