WP(C) 3222/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BP KATAKEY Heard Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. P Roy, lea rned State counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioners in the present petition have challenged the notice inviting tend er dated 30.4.2010 issued by the President, Batadraba Anchalik Panchayat counter signed by the Executive Officer of the said Anchalik Panchayat for settlement o f the markets including the Balisatra Bi-weekly market for the period from 2010- 11 under the provision of the Assam Panchayat Act on the ground that there is un reasonable fixation of the earnest money and in some cases such earnest money fi xed was at 100% of the value of the market. Mr. P Roy, learned State counsel on instruction has submitted that the said NIT has been withdrawn for such defects and on the same date another tender notice d ated 30.4.2010 has been issued fixing the earnest money required to be deposited in respect of the different markets including the Balisatra Bi-weekly market. M r. Roy, the learned State counsel has also produced a copy of the said tender no tice reflecting the earnest money required to be deposited, a copy of which is k ept on record. Mr. Sarma, in view of the aforesaid, submits that the grievance of the writ peti tioners has been met and no cause survives in the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed. It is, however, open to the petitioner to approach this Court if occasion arise, challenging the order of settlement that may be passed pursuant to such sale no tice.