IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10529 of 2011 RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 376, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the victim went to Mutton shop for purchase of mutton and from there she went traceless. Thereafter, the dead body of the victim girl was recovered. It is alleged that Lallu Sahani, Raju Lottery wala, Gaurab Singh and Bijli Paswan used to keep bad eyes on younger daughter of the informant, namely, Nilu Kumari. It is submitted by senior counsel for the petitioner that the petioner is not named in the F.I.R. and no witness has named the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that hear say witness named accused persons including the petitioner as they took liquor in the company of other F.I.R. named accused persons. 2 Considering the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and suspicion nature of accusation subsequently surfaced in the investigation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Saharsa Rail P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)