1 nma66.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 66 OF 2010 IN APPL/806/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1195 OF 2009 Sunita Siddheshwar Shinde ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Ware Education Trust & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Rajesh Patil i/by Mr. Dushyant s. Pagare for the Petitioner. Mr. S.J. Panicker for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. M.M.Jadhav, APP for Respondent No.3. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 28th October, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. This Notice of Motion is filed for condonation of 86 days delay in filing the Appeal. Considering the grounds mentioned in the Notice of Motion the delay is condoned. 2 So far as the main issue is concerned, it is the case of the Appellant that when she is about to confirm in the service, she was compelled to sign a letter of resignation at the residence of the trustee whose husband was a 2 nma66.10.sxw ssm police officer. It is the say of the appellant that the matters of other three teachers which were rejected by the School Tribunal, are pending before this Court. With a view to see that the real issue as raised is required to be examined, the notice of motion is allowed. 3 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-Management states that on merits he has a good case. We will consider the same at the time of hearing the Appeal. 4 The Notice of Motion is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal be listed, now, for admission on 22nd November, 2010. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)