IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36629 of 2008 CHANDAN KUMAR SRIBASTAV @ ANAND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.9.2008 Heard. The informant lodged a report for his motor going missing probably on account of theft of the vehicle. The record of investigation, which is the seizure memo, indicates that the vehicle was recovered from the house of the present petitioner. The contention is that the vehicle was probably put at there by Ward Councilor with whom the petitioner had some enmity, so as to implicating the petitioner. It appears too far fetches defence to accept. The petition is dismissed. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)