In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 3334 of 2009 Date of decision: October 20, 2009 Jarnail Singh .. Appellant Vs. Gurpreet Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. A.N. Jindal, J The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ludhiana (herein referred as 'the Tribunal') has awarded a sum of Rs.1,65,000/- as compensation on account of the injuries suffered by claimant-appellant (herein referred as 'the claimant') in a motor vehicular accident. Irrespective of the fact that the respondents have not filed any appeal, the claimant has come up for enhancement of the compensation. Arguments heard. The claimant had suffered only 4% disability and remained hospitalized for 28 days. The Tribunal awarded compensation on the following heads:- 1. For medical bills Rs.123000/- 2. For permanent disability to the extent of 4%. Rs.25000/- 3. For travelling expenses Rs.5000/- 4. For loss of income Rs.5000/- 5. For attendant charges Rs.2000/- 6. For pain and sufferings Rs.5000/- Total Rs.165000/- Learned counsel for the appellant has urged that due to closure of the business, he had suffered pecuniary loss. He was running an electric F.A.O. No. 3334 of 2009 -2- shop and was earning Rs.10,000/- per month. But, this argument was never raised by the claimant before the Tribunal and no evidence has been led as to what pecuniary loss has been suffered by him. No grounds for enhancement. Dismissed. October 20, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge