1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2010 AND STAMP NUMBER ( APPLN.) NO.3984 OF 2009 Shri Umesh Salgaonkar ... Applicant V e r s u s M/s. R. P. Souza & Co. ... Respondent Mr. P. Rao, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J DATED: 30TH JULY, 2010. The First Appeal preferred by the Appellant has been dismissed for non prosecution by order dated 16th February, 2009. The Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the process fee was not paid by the Appellant. In M. C. A. No. 6 of 2010, the Applicant has given reasons as to why the process fee could not be paid. In the applications, the reasons have been set out as to why the delay is caused in making an application for restoration of the Appeal. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and restoration of Appeal. Hence, the applications are disposed of by passing the following order : O R D E R (A) M.C. A. No. 6 of 2010 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). 2 (B) Stamp Number ( Appln.) No. 3984 of 2009 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) subject to condition that process fee will be paid by the Applicant in the Appeal within a period of three weeks from today. If compliance is not made within the stipulated time of three weeks, the order of dismissal of Appeal will stand. A. S. OKA, J at*