WP 919/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.919/2011 _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for petitioner. Shri V.D. Godbharle, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. Having considered the prayers in the writ petition and the annexures, we are satisfied that this writ petition can be conveniently disposed of without issuing notice to respondent nos.3 & 4. The petitioner is seeking direction to respondent nos.3 & 4 to pay her salary from March, 2004, till this date and continue to pay WP 919/11 2 the same. We are not examining whether the petitioner was paid her salary, whether she is entitled for salary as prayed for in the petition, and whether the petitioner can seek arrears of salary from March, 2004. We are also not examining whether the petitioner is in service as on today. We are keeping all questions open to be considered by the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani. The petitioner has made representation on 13.8.2010, for the reliefs as prayed for in this petition. Mr.Barlinge, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that her representation is not considered by the Education Officer till this date. In view thereof, he submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Parbhani, is directed to consider her representation on merits in accordance with law. Hence, we pass the following order. Respondent no.3 shall consider the petitioner’s representation on merits in WP 919/11 3 accordance with law after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and to respondent no.4. We once again make it clear that we have not examined the merits of the case and respondent no.3 shall deal with the petitioner’s representation dated 13.8.2010 in accordance with law and un-influenced by observations made in this order, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) Dt/- 23.03.2011 ndk/c2331112