HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION No. 12917 OF 2000 Thursday, the Eighth day of July, Two Thousand and Ten Between Ch.Samson (died) Per L.Rs. Ch.Suseela and others Petitioners AND The Govt. of A.P., Rep. By its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others Respondents THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO. 12917 OF 2000 ORAL ORDER: Seeking to declare the order dated 01.06.2000 issued by the third respondent in Rc. No. 2697/2000-A authorizing the fifth respondent herein to operate the transactions and accounts of fourth respondent Society, of which the petitioner was Paid Secretary, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondents to continue services of the petitioner in the fourth respondent society, the present writ petition is filed. The deceased petitioner was appointed as Paid Secretary on 15.7.1978 and he joined the fourth respondent society as such on 1.12.1998. It is his case that few months prior to June, 2000, he suffered paralysis and taking advantage of the same with a view to wreck vengeance against him for participation in the union activity of filing W.P. 18057 of 1999 seeking payment of the revised pay scales, to which fourth respondent was also a party, wherein interim order were also passed and for non-implementation of the same, they filed Contempt Case No. 322 of 2000, the fourth respondent passed resolution dated 19.5.2000 to the effect of removing him from service. In that scenario, the second respondent has issued the impugned proceedings without first examining his fitness to discharge the duties as Paid Secretary. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by order dated 1.11.2000, the impugned orders were suspended and, therefore, the petitioner shall be deemed to be continuing in service of the fourth respondent society. He further submits that the petitioner has died on 10.6.2002 and, as such, the legal heirs of the petitioner shall be entitled to the benefits. Evidently, pursuant to the grant of interim direction, there does not seem to be any reinstatement of the petitioner inasmuch as no material is filed before this court evidencing joining of the petitioner in the fourth respondent society. In that premise, I do not see any reason to entertain the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari July 8, 2010 MAS