IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 554 of 2010 With Stay Application No. 5581 of 2010 1. Daljeet Singh S/o Balkar Singh R/o Haridwar Road, Laksar, Near Sugar Mill Laksar, Laksar, Distt. Haridwar. 2. Rijwan Khan S/o Nishar Khan R/o Village Naroj Pur, P.S. Laksar District Haridwar. 3. Shakil Khan S/o Nishar Khan R/o Village Naroj Pur, P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar. 4. Sanant Kumar S/o Kanwar Pal Village Pralhadpur, P.S. Khanpur District Haridwar. 5. Deepa Singh S/o Fauji R/o Village Bhadhiwala District Muzaffarnagar. ...…………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Sr. Superintendent of Police District Haridwar. 2. Station Officer P.S. Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. 3. Rajesh Kumar S/o Rati Ram R/o Village Gordhan Pur, P .S. Khanpur, District Haridwar. ...…………. Respondents Mr. S.P.S. Panwar, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ms. Sangeeta Bhardwaj, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate, present for respondent No. 3 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2 2) By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report / Crime No. 158 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 420, 506 of I.P.C., police station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. 3) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3 are the recorded co-sharers of the land of Khasra No. 108M and 111, situated in Village Naroj Pur, police station Laksar, District Haridwar. It is pleaded that it was the complainant, who failed to turn up to get the agreement registered on 21.02.2010. 4) Perusal of the first information report discloses that the complainant was made to pay Rs. 10,00,000/- for sale of the land, but neither the money was returned to him, nor the land could be transferred. It is stated by the complainant in his statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. that petitioners No. 1, 2 and 3 under the false name made call to the complainant, and he was made to believe the facts which did not exist. 5) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. 3 6) Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed with the observation that if the petitioners, namely Daljeet Singh, Rijwan Khan, Shakil Khan, Sanant Kumar and Deepa Singh surrender before the court concerned, or arrested, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 5581 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. August 03, 2010. H. Negi