IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1509 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIGILANCE ----------- 2/ 7.4.2010 Having heard Shri Vishwanath Prasad Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Shri Arbind Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the Vigilance Department, the court finds that the learned trial judge has taken note of the directions of the Apex Court and after framing of charges on 5.10.2009, as many as nine witnesses have been examined by it. Learned counsel for the Vigilance submits that eleven more witnesses have to be examined and they could not be examined on account of vacancy in the court which has now been filled up. Considering the allegation against the petitioner as contained in the FIR, the court is not inclined to direct his release especially when SLP has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner should take trial which is going on with some ado. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)