IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.1135 of 2010 (Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated 20.11.2009 in WP.No.25256 of 2009.) BETWEEN A. Janardhan Reddy. ... PETITIONER AND Sri. Pradhyumna, Joint Collector, Chittoor and two others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. JALLI KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: By order dated 20.11.2009 in WP.No.25256 of 2009, this Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor district, to complete the enquiry against the petitioner within a period of three weeks and in the event of failure to do so, he was directed to restore the authorization of the petitioner and supply essential commodities to his fair price shop so as to enable him to distribute the same to the card holders, pending the enquiry. 2. It is now stated by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies that under proceedings dated 22.07.2010 the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chittoor, having completed the enquiry against the petitioner, restored the petitioner’s authorization taking into account the fact that he is an experienced dealer. 3. In the light of the aforestated developments, it is clear that there is no willful disobedience to the order dated 20.11.2009 in WP.No.25256 of 2009 warranting exercise of contempt jurisdiction by this Court. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ SANJAY KUMAR, J April 21, 2011 DSK