IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No.171 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: November 29, 2011 Smt. Kamla .....Petitioner VERSUS Balraj ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. SK Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Bal, Advocate, for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has been allowed a maintenance of `3500/- by noticing that there is an increase more than three times in the salary of the respondent. Earlier, she was getting `1000/- as maintenance. More than three times increase in the maintenance has now been allowed. In addition, Mr. Bal appearing for the respondent also points out that the petitioner is staying in a house provided by the respondent, part of which she has given on rent for which the petitioner is earning a sum of `2500/-. In view of this factual position, no case for enhancement of the maintenance is made out. Dismissed. November 29, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE