IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4300 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.7.2010 Bhupinder Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Gopal Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Divya Vishavjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The only grievance made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in this revision petition while impugning the order dated 22.4.2009 is that there is collusion between Kulwant Singh, the original landlord, and one Gopal Singh, who is said to have purchased the property. The property in question is owned by several persons and it was subjected to a suit for partition and the partition having been effected, warrants of possession have been issued qua respective shareholders. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that he being a tenant, his eviction is imminent and he is being threatened with dispossession and also with deprivation of the property which is likely to be demolished. He, therefore, states that the objections which he had filed in the execution proceedings ought to have been answered in his favour. C.R.No.4300 of 2010 (O&M) -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the plea raised herein is totally without any merit. The valid proceedings in execution of decree in a partition suit are being conducted in which the shares of the respective persons are to be given. If any shareholder had sold the property to someone else then also the petitioners cannot stall or question such a transfer and if he is faced with the threat of eviction or demolition of the tenanted premises, then in that eventuality he has a right under the law which he can avail of, but the objections in execution proceedings are certainly not the answer to the grievance which has been made by the petitioners and hence rightly declined. Dismissed. 14.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss