IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2102 of 2010 1. HAZARI MAHTO S/O KAMAL MAHTO, R/O VILL- BHARWARA, P.S SINGHWARA, DISTT- DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, PROSECUTION DIRECTORATE, BARAK NO,.5, OLD SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA-8000015 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DARBHANGA 4. THE DISTRICT PROSECUTION OFFICER, DARBHANGA 5. SENIOR ASSITATN PROSECUTION OFFICER, PROSECUTION DIRECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE ASSISTANT PROSECUTION OFFICER DISTRICT PROSECUTION OFFICER, DARBHANGA ----------- 2/ 10/08/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner moulds the submission to submit that the application be permitted to be withdrawn as the petitioner proposes to represent before the authorities for revocation of the suspension. If the petitioner as an employee represents before the employer, this Court expects the same to be considered expeditiously in accordance with law when the withdrawal of the writ petition shall not prejudice the right of the petitioner to have his representation considered. The application is disposed as withdrawn. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)