1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO 26 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1718 OF 2007 Sakharam K. Patil .. Petitioner Vs The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors .. Respondents And Jayraj Phatak & Ors .. Contemptuous Mr. Anil R. Mishra for the Petitioner Ms. T.H. Puranik for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATE : 13th APRIL, 2009. P.C.: 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation states that though there has been a delay on the part of Municipal Corporation, a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act has been issued on 08.04.2009. The learned counsel states that copies thereof Rma CONPW2009130409.sxw 2 have been given to the Petitioner and all necessary steps shall be taken for expeditious disposal of the proceeding initiated by the Municipal Corporation. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation states that the proceeding shall be concluded by 30.06.2009. 2. In view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the Municipal Corporation, it would not be expedient to pursue the exercise of the Contempt Jurisdiction. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J) Rma CONPW2009130409.sxw 3 Rma CONPW2009130409.sxw