1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.1016 of 2008 In Writ Petition No.5449 of 2006 Mr.Ibrahim s/o. Mohd. Kasu & anr. Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents Mr.P.L.Bhujbal with Ms.Naeem Shaikh for applicants. Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, AGP for resp.nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.G.Surana i/b. Mr.C.N.Gole for resp.no.4. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. April 21, 2008 P.C. . Writ Petition No.5449 of 2006 has been admitted by this Court on 9/2/2007 and the petition impugns the interlocutory order dated 13/2/2006 passed by the Slum Tribunal in Appeal No.54 of 2005, by which Appeal No.54 of 2005 was remanded for fresh decision. The said appeal on remand has been decided and on 25th August 2006 the application has been allowed. It is thus clear that on the day this petition was admitted, it had become infructuous in asmuchas the impugned order dated 13/2/2006 ceased to subsist. Hence this civil application has ben filed 2 by the petitioners seeking leave to amend the petition memo. The power of attorney of respondent no.4 has filed an affidavit and opposed the amendment. . Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, I am satisfied that the amendment sought for is required to be allowed and hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Petition memo be amended within one week. . It is further clarified that the stay order granted on 9/2/2007 has ceased to exist in asmuchas the proceedings pending before the Competent Authority had already terminated on 25/8/2006. (B.H.MARL