1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100/2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3017/2004 (Decided) Ku. Sheelabai Mahadeoji Nagalwade ...Versus... Mrs. Abha Shukla, Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development, Nagpur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for petitioner] [Smt. S.S. Wandile, Adv. for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 20.06.2008 An order in respect of which contempt petition is complained of is date 13.9.2004, which directed the respondent to decide application for condonation of delay as well as appeal within certain period. Smt. Wandile, learned A.G.P. submits that accordingly application for condonation of delay as well as appeal were decided, as stated in paragraph No.9 of the affidavit though there was some delay that was attributable to the petitioner. The fact, however, 2 remains that there is full compliance of the High Court's order. Not only that paragraph No.9 of the affidavit gives good news for the petitioner that there was an order of reinstatement along with back wages. In view of this, Contempt Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw