IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3106 of 2011 VIJAY KUMAR RAJAK @ VIJAY RAJAK & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Admittedly, marriage of the deceased had taken place in the year 2001 and she died in the year 2010. Furthermore, it is an admitted position that case has been registered under sections 498A, 306, 328/34 of the IPC but contents of the first information report disclose that as per informant’s version his daughter was subjected to cruelty on account of family feud. Moreover, having similar allegation mother-in-law of the deceased has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 4.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 3062/2011. Although petitioner no.1 is husband and petitioner no.2 is brother-in law of the deceased but in course of hearing, learned counsel for petitioners drew my attention towards annexure 2 which is photo stat copy of the petition said to be filed by the informant before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur disclosing the fact that he had lodged the instant case in some misconceptions. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioners, Vijay Kumar Rajak @ Vijay Rajak and Navin Kumar Rajak @ Navin Rajak, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Samastipur in Sarairanjan P.S. Case no. 51 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)