Criminal Revision No. 795 of 1999 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 795 of 1999 Date of Decision: 28.01.2008. Tarsem Singh Khatkar …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for the State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Mr. Chatrath has taken me through FIR No. 294 dated 26.8.1998 registered at Police Station Sadar, Paitala, under Section 353 IPC and has stated that Tarsem Singh, petitioner, was apprehended and was got released by his sons but there is no allegation against him having caused the injuries. Therefore, offence under Section 353 IPC is not made out against him. No statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. on the challan has been placed. Mr. Chatrath has taken me through the order dated Criminal Revision No. 795 of 1999 2 18.12.1998, framing charge wherein it is only stated that heard, finding a prima facie case, a charge under Section 353 IPC is made out. Though this order, is sufficient, but it would have been better in case contentions of learned counsel were noticed and dealt with. Without going into controversy, I remand the matter to the trial Court saying that after hearing the petitioner and taking into consideration all his contentions, order will be passed afresh whether petitioner is guilty of offence under Section 353 IPC or not. In view of the terms discussed above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 28, 2008 “DK”