c ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. ^2^z 7 OF 2004 PETITIONERr f^S'SSSf gs RESPONDENT8: ^yy ^c^1 ^ t^.':'- '/ . ,'f ". \;1 i ^¥^1 D^ Smt. Anjila Kujur, W/0 Jerum •&af^ Kujur, Aged about 41 years, presently posted as Project OfBcer, Integrated Child Development Project, Dharamjaygarh, Distaict Raigarh (Chhatdsgarh). Versus 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Woman and Child Development and Social Welfare, D.K.S. BuUding, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Commissioner, Directorate of Woman and Child Development Department, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Collector, Disto-ict Raigarh (C.G.). 4. District Woman and Child Development OfGcer, Raigarh "^...'l! "•>... 1^IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WIVi^K ^^ r4l4l<riiil^»!flKf?^,;Kawii< snit?r 'qsra? •z^ Hre<ai (hwi* ^I..;:"1^01/^ 208 fq^ET' SIl^IW k-^'M Sl^V ?t»*li<h ^%cf 'afl^l ¥RHW^lfOT 'sbi'iilfi'il-f w^i ^ fs^S <P>]<SI< ^3I^OT31R?I iff '•-.i; 88, Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Counsel| Shri Satish Gupta, D}'. Go-vt Advoj Application. for urgent hsaring is a^l for ftis petitioner. ;ate for the State. Leamed counsel for the petitioner has been transferred from Dharamjais Submits fliat the petitioner 'i'Ao is a lady tfh to Darbha, District Bastar. ^ide Annexure - P/l, 15-7-2004, TOth4> a period of 10 months. He further subnsits tfast she belongs to Scheduled issued bv the State Govei-nment, vide yribe categon' and as per the circular i|imexure - P,'5. dated 6-8-2003. such persons sliould not be transferred affaia and again on admnustrative yoynd. It is pointed out by the leamed S submitted any representation in this regard Haiing considered and ndthout es fhe case, ia the opinion of this CourL ends i^ate counsel that ihe pstitioner has not l>efore tfae competent authorities. fressing any opinion on fbe merits of |ofjustiee wiB be sep.'ed if a direction ia given to the petitioner to make a detaflep representalion raisine her grie^ances bsfore the competent authority of the r^spondents along with a copy of the petition and fhis order, witlria 15 days, an^ eompetent autboiity of tbe respondents sh4 accordsnce with law as earty as possible date of recsipt of the representation. It y remains, the petitioner may svailthe remed}! ''iVith the aforesaid observations. thisl on such represeatation being filed, the fl decide the same on its own merits in preferabh' TOtIiin sis.weeks fi-om fhs mads clear that if any grievance still available under the law. petition staads disposed of. Consequently M.W.P.No.l9S9/20(}4 and LA.No. 5083/2004 aiso stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Fakhruddin Judge