1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. No. 573 of 2010 In FA (St) No. 1791 of 2010 Smt Sapna and anr v. Sau Anjanabai and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr A.M. Gedam, Adv for applicants Mr S.A. Kalbande, Adv for respdts Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 17 h June 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length. There is delay of 351 days caused in filing first appeal. It is stated in the application that the applicants were sick and bed-ridden for long time and could contact their counsel only on 19.1.2009 and thereafter appeal has been filed. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the application on the ground that grounds set out are false. He submits that if at all application is to be allowed, the same may be allowed subject to payment of heavy costs. 3. For the reasons stated in the application and in the interest of justice, I am 2 inclined to condone the delay. Delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1000/- to be paid to the counsel for contesting respondents within four weeks from today. 4. Appeal be registered and placed for admission chronologically. Judge. Hsj