SBCWP No.10373/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10373/2010. Roop Narain Dinesh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order:- December 15, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Suresh Pareek for the petitioner. ******* BY THE COURT:- Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that respondent No.4 is raising a Commercial Four Storied Building on a plot of the size of 225 square yards, which was alloted to Smt.Nathi Devi, sister of the petitioner under Rehabilitation Scheme. According to Condition Nos.11 & 12 of the allotment letter, allottee was required to comply with the conditions for allotment, failing which, land shall liable to be resumed with the State Government. Petitioner approached the Jaipur Municipal Council but no action has been taken because authorities of the Jaipur Municipal Council are in hands and gloves with respondent No.4. It is further contended that respondent No.4 is raising construction beyond the permissible limits and contrary to the bye-laws and that no such valid permission has been with him inasmuch as, he is power of attorney holder of SBCWP No.10373/10. 2 petitioner's sister Smt.Nathi Devi and Smt.Nathi Devi expired but the Jaipur Municipal Council is not examining the documents of respondent No.4. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the material on record, instead of directly entertaining this writ petition, I require the petitioner to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer of the Jaipur Municipal Council, which shall consider all his arguments and dispose of such representation after hearing respondent No.4 within a period of one month from the date of its making. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J. anil