IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 8142 of 2009 Date of Decision: 6.4.2010. Jasbir Singh --Petitioner Versus The Vice Chancellor, Panjab University and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. M.L. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.L. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioner is claiming refund of the fee on the basis of the Govt. of India Instructions dated 14.4.2007 (Annexure P-3). A true copy of this document has been produced by the respondents. It appears that the document produced by the petitioner is tempered one. As a matter of fact, in view of the Govt. Instructions, the petitioner is not entitled to refund of the fee unless the seats falling vacant are filled up by the last date of admission. In the reply filed by the respondents, it is categorically stated that as many as 42 seats remained vacant as on the last date of making admissions. Under these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. In view of the fact that the tempered document has been filed, the petitioner should have been burdened with heavy costs, however, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads that the petitioner is a handicapped and thus the costs are not being imposed. Dismissed as withdrawn. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 6.4.2010. lucky