IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10467 of 2009 1. BISHMILAH ANSARI son of Md. Serajuddin Ansari, Resident of Village Narhan, Police Station Raghunathpur, District- Siwan. 2. Md. Ekbal Hussain son of Md. Rahman Ali, Resident of Village Mobarakpur, Police Station Krishnagadh, District Bhojpur (Ara). 3. Rohitash Kumar son of Sri Motilal, Resident of Mohalla Gola Road Danapur Cantt. Police Station Danapur, District- Patna. 4. Vinod Paswan son of Sri Bindeshwar Paswan, Resident of Village Pranpur Berui, Police Station Hazipur Sadar, District Vaishali (Hazipur). 5. Umesh Kumar singh son of Sri Jagdish Singh, Resident of Village Gansadih, Police Station Town, District Rohtas. 6. Kaushal Kishore Prasad son of Sri Ganesh Ram, Resident of Village Sri Rampur, Police Station Manjhi, District- Saran. 7. Pawan Kumar son of Sri Hans Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village Ottee, Police Station Sourbazar, District- Saharsa. 8. Pramod Kumar Prasad son of Sri Shyamlal Prasad, Resident of Village Balia, Police Station Maharajganj, District- Siwan. 9. Santosh Kumar Yadav son of Sri Ramadhar Yadav, Resident of Village shahjahanpur, Police Station Rampur Karkhana, District Devaria (U.P.) 10. Kishore Lakara, son of Late Johan Lakara, Resident of Village Durjan, Police Station Ranka, District Gadhwa (Jharkhand). . . . . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 5. The Commissioner Saran Division, Chapra 6. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saran (Chapra). . . . . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 25.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are the Assistants-cum-Clerks. They were appointed against the Advertisement No. 22 of 1998 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000/-, as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in - 2 - C.W.J.C. No. 13577 of 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under order dated 17.12.2007, Annexure to this application, against which the State respondents preferred L.P.A. 522 of 2008, which was also dismissed under orders dated 29.09.2008, Annexure-5/1 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.09.2008, Annexures 5 and 5/1 to this application. 4. Let the District Magistrate, Saran (Chapra) consider the representation of the petitioners, as contained in Annexure-6 to this application in the light of the aforesaid two order dated 17.12.2007 and 29.09.2008, Annexures 5 and 5/1 to this application and pass appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Uday/ (V. N. Sinha, J.)