IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19754 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 21.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of petitioner is that his flour Mill was running by electric power but finding no regular electricity, petitioner decided to get his connection disconnected, applied also and made the last payment on 30.10.2009. Admittedly electric machine was there with all equipments and connection from meter and that remained in his Mill due to finding none to purchase the same. Only suspicion is cast that by using Toka, petitioner would have been running his Mill and basing the same refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 17/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)