:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1 OF CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1 OF CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1 OF 2007 2007 2007 P.A.Nathan ..Petitioners. Vs. Sanjay R. Shinde & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.M.P.Vashi for the Petitioners. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, A.P.P. for the State of Maharashtra. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007 DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007 DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The entire petition is based on a submission that the Civil Court in a proceeding based on an evidence brought on record, has come to the conclusion that the stamp receipts that were issued were fabricated documents. The matter is in Appeal. 2. As the matter is in appeal and the findings are open for consultation, it will not be a fit case at this stage to exercise the contempt jurisdiction. Hence the petition is dismissed. :2: 3. It will be open to the Petitioner after the Appeal is disposed of, if he is so entitled to in law to move by way of fresh petition. 4. Contempt Petition accordingly disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (F.I. REBLLO, J.)