IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11063 of 2006 Between: Andhra Electronics Ltd., Plot 34 & 35, Industrial Development Area, Kakinada, E.G.District, rep. by its Managing Director, B.N. Larayana, S/o. B. Viswanatham, H.No.2-4-12/1, Girij Street, Sai Nagar, Kakinada, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., ( Government of A.P. Undertaking Having its - Registrered Office at Hyderabad, rep. by its Genral Manager. 2 The A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Zonal Office, Industrial Development Area, Kakinada, E.G.District, rep. by its Zonal Manager. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Letter No. 69/A/KKDII/92/387 dt. 31.3.2006 as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents:MR.K.V.SIMHADRI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 2nd respondent passed in Letter No. 69/A/KKDII/92/387 dt. 31.3.2006 as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction.” At the hearing, Sri O.Manoher Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by proceedings, dated 02.04.2008, the Zonal Manager of the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited revoked cancellation order, dated 31.03.2006 and restored plot Nos.69 to 72 to the petitioner. The petitioner also filed an affidavit to this effect. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition is accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 06.06.2006 is vacated and WPMP.No.13767 of 2006 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 13th AUGUST, 2009. kvni