IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42687 of 2010 MUKUL SINGH @ ANIL SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Theft is said super-addition. Demand of ransom is said improbable as real dispute is in between informant and co-accused Uma Singh nephew and uncle in relation. Petitioner and co-accused Wakil Singh are witnesses to deed executed in favour of wife of co- accused Uma Singh. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti (Chkand O.P.) P.S. Case No.175 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)