IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10470 of 2010 1. KIRAN MISHRA W/O NAGENDRA MISHRA R/O SHUBH APRAJITA APARTMENT , NADANPURI, P.S.SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTT-PATNA Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG, PATNA-800001 THROUGH ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG, PATNA-800001 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR-CUM-REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICER, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG, PATNA-800001 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG, PATNA-800001 6. THE REGIONAL MANAGER , STATE BANK OF INDIA JUDGES COURT ROAD, PATNA 7. THE SENIOR MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA RAJA BAZAR BRANCH, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA ----------- 3. 05.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Employees State Insurance Corporation. After some argument leave is sought to withdraw this application to avail remedies against the impugned order before the Employees Insurance Court under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. If the petitioner files any application before the Insurance Court seeking interim relief, it is expected that the Insurance Court shall consider and dispose of such application at the earliest. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)