IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.328 of 2011 ASHOK SINGH, SON OF LATE MUNI LAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 24.6.2010 on merits but had renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that the Informant is purposely trying to delay the trial on some pretext or the other. The Informant has appeared here and opposes the prayer for bail and is unable to explain as to why he was not appearing in the court below. Considering that on merits, I have already refused bail, I am not inclined to review the said order. However, the Trial Court will impose adequate cost on the Informant or his brother if he fails to appear before the Trial Court to purposely delay the trial, since he is appearing before this Court to oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner but he is conveniently taking time before the Trial Court. With these observations, the application is disposed off. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)