IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43094 of 2009 1.CHHOTEY LAL SINGH @ CHHOTEY LAL CHAUHAN son of Deo Raj Chauhan 2.Sri Ram Chauhan son of Dhan Raj Singh 3.Hari Shankar Mishra son of Bhaij Nath Mishra Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.43834 of 2009 1. JEERA DEVI wife of Lal Saheb Chauhan 2. Lal Saheb son of Ram Pujan Chauhan Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under sections 128(i), 270, 364, 365, 423 and 424 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the alleged kidnapping had been done for the reason of execution of sale deed and not for ransom and the complaint is delayed by one month, let the petitioners above named who are in custody since 22.9.2009 and have no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No.57 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (a) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (b) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. - 2 - (c) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Md.S. (Anjana Prakash,J.)