IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.926 of 2010 1. INDRAJEET RAY S/O RAM UDGAR ROY R/O VILL DHAIDH, P.S.KHANPUR,DISTT-SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SAMASTIPUR, DISTT-SAMASTIPUR 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KHANPUR, DISTT-SAMASTIPUR 5. THE SARPANCH, GRAM KACHAHARI GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BISHANPUR AABHI, P.S.KHANPUR, DISTT-SAMASTIPUR ----------- 3/ 03/08/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner states that he was appointed as Secretary, Gram Kutchery on 24.10.2007. A controversy arose with regard to equivalence of ‘Madhyama’ to ‘Matriculation’ for appointment. This led to a retrospective amendment after orders of this Court of the appointment rules notified in January, 2009 with retrospective effect from 31.1.2008. This aspect has been considered by this Court in more than one order. It is incomprehensible why the authorities insist on individual petitioners bringing individual orders from this Court, multiplying litigation. This writ petition is disposed off in similar terms as C.W.J.C. No.1316/2010 including the directions given therein to the respondent authorities. - 2 - Let such appropriate decision in light of the discussion contained in C.W.J.C. No.1316/2010 be taken by the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development within a maximum period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)