IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6232 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.10.2009 Mohinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus Rattan Lal and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sherry K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 10.2.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, dismissing the petitioner's application for impleadment as a party-defendant in a Civil Suit for permanent injunction filed by the first respondent against the 2nd respondent. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagadhri, dismissed the application of the petitioner after observing that the controversy in the Civil Suit pertains to khasra No.458, whereas the petitioner is stated to have purchased the plot comprising khasra No.451. C.R. No.6232 of 2009 (O&M) 2 It is also on record that the petitioner has also filed a Civil Suit in which the first respondent as well as some other persons are impleaded as defendants. If that is so, the appropriate course for the petitioner would be to move an application either for clubbing both the Civil Suits together or to entrust the same to one Presiding Officer so as to avoid the possibility of contradictory findings. The petitioner, however, on the basis of the sale deed pertaining to khasra No.451, cannot force the respondents to implead her as a party-defendant. With these observations, the revision petition is disposed of. Dasti. 29-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE