IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5816 of 2011 alongwith CWP No. 5817 of 2011. Decided on: 1st August, 2011. CWP No. 5816 of 2011 Ishwar Dev ….. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another …… Respondents. CWP No. 5817 of 2011 Vishwa Dev ….. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim benefit of adhoc and tenure services rendered by them. It is seen that some period is as J.B.T. teacher and some period is as Shastri teacher. As far as J.B.T. is concerned, that period will count only for the purpose of pension as per Rule 13 of the Pension Rules. As far as the adhoc/tenure period in the post of Shastri is concerned, in case the same is followed by regular appointment, that period shall be counted for the purpose of increments and pension, in view of judgment in LPA 36/2010. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice Ist August, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (rana/hl) Judge.