IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17066 of 2009 MAHESH PRASAD S/O LATE SHRI DARBARI RAM R/O MOHALLA- BRAHBATRA, P.S.- ARRAH TOWN, DISTT.- BHOJPUR ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH IT'S CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE COLLECTOR, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH 3. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER-CUM- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA PARISHAD, BHOJPUR AT ARRAH ---Respondents ----------- 2. 8.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of retiral dues as also certain arrears of salary etc. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had filed a representation before the Collector, Bhojpur at Arrah (respondent no.2), but still his claims have not been settled as yet. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the grievances as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file two separate representations for respective grievances before the District Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhojpur at Arrah (respondent no.3). In case such representations are filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a 2 period of six weeks, respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the admitted retiral dues of the petitioner could be paid without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)