IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2007 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 3979 of 2007(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ VALLIAYAMMA, W/O.MURUGESAN, CORPORATION COLONY, KOTTAPPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, CORPORATION BUILDINGS, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN. R2 BY SHRI.C.N.SURESH BABU, SC, KOZHIKODE COPRN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J. ========================= WP(C).No.3979 OF 2007-W. ========================= Dated this the 21st day of February, 2007. J U D G M E N T The petitioner, it is stated, had worked under the 2nd respondent Corporation during the period 1973 to 1975 as a Badali Scavenger. According to her, she had worked so in the leave of a number of persons. It is contended that she is entitled to be absorbed into service with the benefit of regularisation of service under the respondent Corporation against one of the posts befitting to her qualifications, eligibility and experience. 2. Ext.P2 representation filed by the petitioner is pending with the 2nd respondent. 3. Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent, on instructions, submits that the request made by the petitioner in Ext.P2 will be considered with reference to the relevant records and the result communicated to the petitioner. 4. I feel that a time frame will have to be fixed WP(C).No.3979 of 2007. 2 by this Court for the disposal of Ext.P2. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 on merits, pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment together with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for due compliance. K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE. kvs/-