IN THE ‘HIQH CQURT OF CHHATTISGABH AT §ILASPUE WRIT PETITIQN IS) NO. H33; OF 2Q10 L'a‘a Ram Patet 5/0 Late shri ’Dataram Patel, aged about 65 Retired Patwari R/Q Vinage— Pokargaon Lanoonga, District— Raigqrh, (C.G.). ‘ PETITIONER years, Occupation- Post— Birsiy'a, ‘ 1 VERSU§ RESPQNDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District— Raipur, (C.G.). CoHector, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, (C.G. Sub Divisionai Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (.G.). ‘ , /2. /3. Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Sub Division Gharghoda, District~ Raigarh, i (C.G.). @ @ i 5. Sub Divisional Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh! (C.G.). ‘ WRIT PETITIQN gm 226 OF THE cogsmTgTION ’ _——/ OF INgiA ‘ Revenue Inspector, Revenue Division, Laiiunga, Tahsii— Gharghoda, District- Raigarh, (C.G.). ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (Si N0. 1337 of 2010 PETIT!ONER : Lala Ram Paiei. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgam & Others. Writ Petition Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of india SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotn’, J. Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents‘ ORAL ORDER With the consent of ieamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finaily. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. 2. This Court, in the matter of WP. No. 4642/2004 (3aljnatl7 Manda] V. The State of Chhaa‘lSga/h & omens) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retirai dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Ke/a Bai Chandra/tar Vs. sew Governmentand owerst and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (swag of Chhazzfsgarh & Others V. Bayhath Manda] andanomei). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31“ of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Bali/7am Mandel (supia) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the partiess p) (Passed on 303 day of March, 2010) With the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate Genera! is directed to send the case to the Commtttee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a § IA copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the ‘ Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the ofhcers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The petitioner shall supply-extra copy of the petition to the teamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the some to the Committee.