il^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. ^ /2011 PETITIONER ^^^^••^^ ^.^•^^'^^;:.-- ^<t^"^n sies^" ^-:"':"'-<^> RESPONDENTS 1.- f^- / pr, S;/^ ^ fa?(^['S-'T-l ( Devendra Kumar Poya, S/o Keshav Lal, aged about 28 years, Forest Guard at Dornapal, R/o Village Dornapal, Tahsil & Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh- Through :- The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Conservator of Forest, Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Divisional Forest Officer, Sukma, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA, 2.' 3. HICrH COIJRT OF CHHATri8<'TARH AT BTTASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION ('S) No. 5365 of2011 DevCTAa Kum.ar Poya. RESPONDENT8 VRR8IJ8 State ofChhattisgaA & Others. WRIT PEIITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF £\TDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Agmhotri,.!. Present: Shri N.K.Cfaatt.erjee^ Advocate fi^r the petitioiier, Sliri Shashaiik Tliakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/resposideiits. O R DE R (Passed on 12m day of September, 2011) 1. L-ea-med coimsel a.ppea.rmg for the petitioner Biabmits that vide order dated 15,07:2010 (Aimexi^re P/l), th^ petitiosier, working a.s Forest Guard at Raage Doma.pa.1, Forest Division Sukma, Jagdalpun ha.s been tra-nsferred to Ka.nker, on the (jptioii of the CoBsen/'ator of Forest Ka.nker, on liis own reqiiest. However, t.he petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new place of post.mg. Shd Chatterjee fiirther submits that onee the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the govermneiit to that it is complied with immediately. He relies on a decision oft.he Snpreme Court m Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v, State of/l^am & others, m svpport. of his oont.eHt.ioii tha-t if the order is Bot complied with, a. direction caa be issiied for enforcement thereof 2. Leamed coimsel appearing for the St.ate/resnondeiits sixbmits tliat tiiat iftlie tramfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Aimexiire P/l) is still m exist.ence and has not been complied with- appropriate woyld be takeii to comply with the order, 3, Ifthe aforesa.id transfer order is st.ill in existeiice, the govemmeBt i.s imder a-n obligation to comply with the same a.t once. It is a.ccordmgiy directed that the tramfer order shall be complied with forthwitk within a period oftwo weeka. 4. Accordisigly^ tUs petitioB is disposed of • sd/~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (1996)108cc567