Crl. Misc. No.M-26613 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-26613 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 29, 2010 Sukhpal Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) No doubt, the case of the prosecution rests upon the circumstantial evidence which is considered to be a weak type of evidence, since only investigating officer remains to be examined, as such it is deemed inappropriate to express any opinion weighing the strength of the evidence against the petitioner at this stage. Dismissed. Crl. Misc. No.M-26613 of 2010 [2] November 29, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE