1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.313 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2263 OF 2004 Smt. Komalam Ramchandra Nair & ors ....Plaintiffs V/s. Mahim Sampada Co-Op. Hsg Soc Ld & anr ....Defendants Ms. Bina Pai, for the Plaintiffs. Mr G.G. Ketkar, lst Assistant to Court Receiver. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 27 th NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The Court Receiver’s Report is answered in the affirmative in respect of the directions sought in paragraph 9(d). 2. The directions sought in para 9(a), therefore, do not survive. 3. The Plaintiff has already paid ad hoc royalty till February,2010. Thus, no orders on paragraph 9(c) of the report are necessary. 4. The question of the Plaintiffs executing agency agreement will arise only upon the Court Receiver calling upon the Plaintiffs to execute the same after furnishing necessary particulars including the royalty payable. 5. Even if the Plaintiffs do not accept the agency agreement, there is no question of the Court Receiver being discharged as the order dated 17th June,2005 appointing the Court Receiver, requires him in that event to invite bids and to appoint the highest bidder as the agent. Receiver’s report is accordingly disposed of.