SJpjl.glX Dr^^ c<^ //-^r^_ ^- IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^> ^:^\^' -. ^v\^>"~ ^ ^" ^" W.P.(SINO. USt^S /2010 ^ Ranban Das, S/o Heera Singh, aged about 23 years, R/o. village Machaha, Post Badra 'B', Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) /" ^'' WRIT PETITION UNDBRARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. '^^5^^,;'- -HC—78 ^^T^T'f^TbF Wff ^R?T'^7RT°F 'T-'-nNiiiiiiiiiiiiiauf' T ^ST ^Nicri^, ^^1^^i(o, fs<diy'j,< .-.„„..:.. [.f^cs/r-^^^ji ^m^T (b^i^ ....*.—........v........................,...-,.^^/^ ^TT^T 'q?R7 ( yif^^) /0§ •^nw^f^sn^?? SB : Hoa>ble Shri Masiisadra Wohaa Shrivastava, J. 9.8.2010 Shri Soinkant Verma, c< Smt. Smita Ghai, Panejl advaace lcopy. The petitioner was iiii1 fixed pay ofRs.100/-. After c granted regulai' pay scale. t^ally appea^nig Leaiiied counsel issue iavolved in the case is regular pay scale with effect after completion of probation The issue irivolved h| Pra-desh State Adniiiiistrativd [Madhukant Ycsdu and 561 where.io., it was held tli.at tlie regular pay scale wifh effect niatter was takeu up to fhe Petition (CivU) No.6892/ 1993J Hou'ble Suprenie Court uphc^] efiect tliat the Teachers/Assi^ scale froin fhe date of uiitial "cftl^f^<U1 "HT^ft ^ fe^ iF^^K i7^W3?rt?T 'unsel for tiie petitioner. 1 Lawyer for fhe State/respondents, on appoiated as Deputy Teacher on a >mpletion ofliis probatiou period, he was for tlie petitioner subniitted tliat the LS to whether the petitioner is entitled to froni the date of io.itial appointaient or >eriod, ^reiii was considered by tlie Madhya Tribimal, Jabalpur in O.A.No. 2745/89 Offeers ^ Stafe cif il€P. &. ^thers), siniilarlv sitiiated teachers ai'e entitle.d to $:om fhe date of initial appomtaient, The ^lon'ble Suprciae Court ia Special Leave The said petition was dismissed by the Idiag the decision of fhe Tribunal to the ^tant Teachers are entitled to regular pay a}ppoio.taient »....L fc^: '~^^^& iCI-ftC—78 '^^-•."'•" ^'i ^•v:';^ ^TI^T ^r'f^rbF ^Tl ^S^ SD^W Praveeii '3'^T "4|^t<^iq, ^Tl1^<|<o, fs<diyy 'WT^IT 'gRI^?""""""""""""""""""""" """"^ 200 ^I^?T XRW (^i^^T) ^ ^»)l^(<?l<i1l'^TR^ft "^ fe^t <l^l^l< ^3?ftR^??^r Leamed counsel appeaj|iag for fhe petitioner further subaiits tliat fhis Court, while consider|rLg the sarae issue ia Amar Sai Rcun Ss Others v. State of ChhnttisjfGrh & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006, by order dated 01-09-2006J representation withio. a period aiid ftie Circular dated 13-011 concemed respoudent is direcj atlowed the petitiouers to make a ^ften days, raisiag atl fhe grievaaces. Accordiagly, the petiti^ner is graated Mberty to aiake a representatiou raisiag aU griev^iices ni fhe Mght of aforesaid judgment -2009 (Annexure P-6) aad ia tum, the bed to decide fhe representation, if any, in accordance wifh law, on iljs own nxerits, wifhio. a period of eight weeks froin tlie date of rec^ipt of tlie representatiou, subject to verification of fh.e facts. In view offhe foregoiiig, to costs. th.is petition is disposed off, No order as Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge t~-