IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3887 OF 2010 Between : Mandala Raji Reddy .... PETITIONER A N D Iloni Shashirekha and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3887 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order, dated 13.07.2010 in O.S.No.94 of 2004, on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Peddapalli. 2. Heard both sides. 3. O.S.No.94 of 2004 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Peddapalli, was filed by the respondents herein (plaintiffs) for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties. The petitioner herein filed two unregistered documents before the Court below on behalf of the petitioner. Those documents were rejected on the ground that they are not registered under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 ( for short “the Act”) and so they are inadmissible. The petitioner is claiming the title basing on those two simple sale deeds, dated 10.04.1981 and 10.08.1982, though they are unregistered, but they are validated by the competent Authority. The petitioner also paid the stamp duty including registration as required under Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act 1899. Therefore, the trial Court ought to have received those documents. 4. Considering the above legal position, the impugned order is set aside and the Court below is directed to receive the documents subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility that may be raised by respondents herein in the trial Court. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J OCTOBER 25, 2010. YVL