IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23376 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 15, 2011. The Ran Vijay Cooperative Transport Society Ltd. .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Minderjeet Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-Cooperative Transport Society seeks a direction to the State Transport Authority to allot it an alternative route No.25 instead of route No.39 initially allotted to it. The above stated relief has been sought by the petitioner- society vide a representation dated 1.8.2011 (Annexure P-4) also, to which no response has been received by it so far. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider and dispose of the the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner as CWP No.23376 of 2011 [2] contained in the representation dated 1.8.2011 (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. December 15, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE