THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5775 OF 2010 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the docket order dated 26.6.2010 in I.A. No.411 of 2008 in O.S. No.129 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur. 2. The brief facts are, the respondent/plaintiff filed Original Suit No.129 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur against the petitioners/defendants for grant of permanent injunction in respect of plaint schedule property, and made therein interlocutory application No.561 of 2008 for grant of interim injunction pending disposal of the suit. The trial Court granted ad-interim injunction on 15.5.2008 in the said application. Thereafter, the respondent/plaintiff filed the present interlocutory application no.411 of 2008 seeking police protection for implementation of the interim injunction order alleging that during subsistence of the ad-interim injunction, the petitioners/defendants are trying to disturb his possession. In the said application, the trial court ordered to issue police aid for implementation of the ad- interim injunction till disposal of I.A. No.561 of 2008. Challenging the same, the petitioners/defendants preferred the present revision. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The impugned order reads thus: “In the result, this application is allowed. Issue police aid for implementation of Ad-interim injunction orders dt.15.5.2008 till the disposal of the I.A.561/2008. The police aid is subject to the result of I.A.561/2008.” As seen from the impugned order, it is only a consequential order passed in pursuance of the ad- interim injunction order dated 15.5.2008. So long as the ad-interim injunction is in favour of the respondent/plaintiff, the petitioners/defendants are restrained from trespassing into the schedule property. But, as they were violating the said order and trying to interfere with the possession of the respondent/plaintiff and dispossess him, the latter filed the present petition for police aid to safeguard his possession over the property. Therefore, the trial court rightly passed the impugned order granting police aid for implementation of the ad-interim order dated 15.5.2008 till disposal of I.A. No.561 of 2008 and subject to result in the said application, and there are absolutely no grounds to interfere with the same. 5. However, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that evidence on plaintiff side is completed in the suit and it is coming for defendants’ side evidence. Therefore, the trial Court is directed to make an endeavour to dispose of the suit as early as possible subject to other old and part-heard cases. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 28.1.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5775 OF 2010 28.1.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5775 OF 2010 28.1.2011 Between: G.SAtyanarayana & another …Petitioners And G.Nagendra …Respondent