•'f .r^&S?^. /r~~" 'Sft. ^ Petitjonei \\s, Nathuram, son of Bdhram, aged about 61 years, Personal No.14482, resldent of Street No. 38, Qr.No.3-B, Sector-7, Bhiiai N'agar, DistrlcS Durg (CG). Versus ^ Responcients 1) Managing Director, Bhiiai Steel Piant, Bhiiai, District Dur" fChhsttisQsrhy "o -^—•••"""—•^^—•••j- 2) Labour Court, through its Presiding OrRcer, Labour.^Court, Durg (CG). •\, 3) industriai' Court of Chhattisgarh, through its President, Near City Clock Tower, G.E. Road, Rslpuf (CG). SV\/rit Petltion under Article 227 of the Constiiution of india) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri H.B. Agrawa!, Sr. Advocate with Shri Pankaj AgrawaLcounsei fc the petitioner. Shri GaLitam Bhaduri. counsel for the resDondents. ist (Passed on I" day ofMay, With consent of iearneci counsel appearing for both the parties, tne matter is heard finailv. "- 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks compliance of the order dated 6-10-1985 passed by the Industrial Court, in this petitfon. 3) No adjudication is required in the present case as the petitioner seeks compliance ofthe order passea' by the industrial Court. 4) • Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the order passed by the industrial Court, has been oomplied with in its letter and spirit and entire amount, whatever due fo him, has been paici. 1 nie?- •'afBMiO ja^uitud i ~/PS > 'sisoo oise jspjo ON 'io pssodsip si uoi}!i9d eyi 'A|6uipjooov 'jsBeuj s'w uT§SA!f<jns 6u!4}ou 'uoipsjip SAoqe 341,0 MBIA u| (g •saiyea psiusouoo 34} oi soitou 6u|nssi jsye siiiuouj esju} 10 pousd e uiyiiM suues ai)} spioap pue (s/d sjnxsuuv) fr8/aid^'t?OS 'OM lesddv ui pessed sg6i.-OL.-9 pstep jspjo syt p soueiidujoo oi pjeBsj UI!M ssindsip lenpe^ oiui >joo! 01 psissnbsj si +jnoo leuisnpu! siii 'soiisni 10 isaj3}ui su2 ui 'snLti 'seindsip lenpBi SSAIOAUI eseo syi 'AELU 11 SE ^eui ag (g