1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.3638 of 2008. In Crim. Writ Petition No. 315 of 2008. Laxman Tukaramji Durge – applicant. Vithoba Bhisikar. Vs. State of Maharashtra. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri M. K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant. Shri A. S Fulzale, APP for State. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 23rd JANUARY 2009. 1. This application is filed for speaking to minutes and for review of the order dated 9-7-2008. 2. Review is sought on the ground that similar prayer was made by the co-accused before the learned Sessions Judge in Revision Application No.611/2007, which application is dismissed. This point was argued on the last date, and the petitioner was called upon to show as to whether the present applicant was the applicant before the Sessions Court in the Revision application, which has been dismissed. 2 3. Admittedly, the writ petitioner in W.P. No.315 of 2008 was not the applicant before the Sessions Court. 4. The position that no interference was done by the Sessions Court does not operate to preclude exercise of jurisdiction by this Court in a writ petition filed by the co-accused. 5. In these premises, no indulgence is called for,. 6. Criminal application is rejected. JUDGE Sbm