y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTlSGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetitionrS)No. 1451 of2009 PETITIONER : D.P. Gedam S/o late Shri B.L. Gedam, aged about 46 years, Employed as Assistant Grade III, O/o Superintending Engmeer, Ground Water Survey Circle, Water Resources jDeipartaient, Civil Lines, Sihawa Bhawan, Raipur, residing at Ralpur. VE^iUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretaiy Water Resources Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur 492001 (CG). 2. The Engineer in Chief^ Water Resources Department, Sihava Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur 492001 (CG). 3. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Pariyojana, Raipur (CG). 4. The Superintending Engineer, Gi'ound Water Survey Circle, Water Resources department, Civil Lines, Sihawa Bhawan, Raipur 492001 (CG). (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTnJTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnihotri J.) Present : Shi'i B.P. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shi-i Y.S. Thalcur, Deputy Advocate General with Shi-i M.P.S. Bhatia, DeputyGovt. Advocate for the State. -^- ORALORDER (Passcd osi 19th day ofMarch, 2009) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing flnally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat for the present fhe petitioner may be given an opportunity of filing the detailed representation before the competent authority, to which leamed counsel appearmg for the respondents/State has no objection. Sahu 2. Having coiisidered and without expressing any opinion on merits ofthe case, inthe opinion ofthis court, ends ofjustice will be served ifliberty is graiited to tlie petitioner to make a detailed representation raising his grievances befbre the competent authority ofthe respondents along with a copy ofthe petition and this order, within a period ofone monfh from today aiid on such representation being filed, the competent airthority ofthe respondents may decide the same on its own merit, in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within aperiod ofthree months from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 3. With the aforesaid observation, this petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge