1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 1079 OF 2009 Suryakant Ramdas Patil and another Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. A. S. Gaikwad, Advocate i/b Mr. A. J. Talhar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard counsel. There is chequered history of litigation between the parties. During the course of investigation by letter dated 15th January, 2008, by outward No.66 of 2008, Police Inspector, Jalgaon City Police Station, Jalgaon, has indicated this Court in terms of letter of Assistant Registrar No.34022 dated 3rd August, 2007, in Criminal Writ Petition No. 266 of 2007, that the offence, subject matter of present proceedings, for alleged misappropriation of the funds, has been investigated by the police and in the investigation it revealed that the complaint is under misconception of facts as the withdrawal of Rs. 3,10,000/- was to meet the court expenses at different 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. levels and to protect the interest of the labours. According to the investigator, "C" Summary report is filed before the learned J.M.F.C. In the situation, counsel withdraws the application. It is accordingly disposed of. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:02/09/2009. ans/1079