IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18890 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR @ SANTOSH RAI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner no. 1 being the husband and petitioner no. 2 is the younger brother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498 (A), 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that a joint application has been filed in Divorce Case No. 183 of 2009 by the husband and wife to the effect that they want to leave separately. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, namely, (1) Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Rai (2) Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Rai in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 714 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 2 However, petitioner no. 1 (husband) bail bond only be accepted by the Court below after verifying all the contents of the joint petition filed in Divorce Case No. 183 of 2009 as contained in Annexure-2. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)