IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 11th Day of August, 2010. Ist Bail Application No. 754 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Suchita Gaeen W/o Shri Mukund Gaeen R/o Village Gurugram No.2 Shaktifarm, Police Station Sitarganj, Dist- Udham Singh Nagar ….…....Applicant(In Jial) Versus State of Uttarakhand ………..Opposite Party Arising out of F.I.R. No. 84 of 2010, Under Section: 304B I.P.C and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Police Station: Sitarganj District: Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. M.K.Ray, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate, with Mr. T.C.Aggarwal, A.G.A., Present for the State. Applicant Suchita Gaeen, who is in jail in connection with Crime/F.I.R. No. 84 of 2010, relating to offence punishable Under Section 304 B I.P.C., 2 and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought her release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant is a woman. She is mother in law of the deceased. It is pleaded that no specific role has been assigned to her in the First Information Report . It is also pointed out on behalf of the applicant that Post Mortem Report shows that cause of death could not be ascertained. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of this case, this court is of the view, that applicant deserves bail. Bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Suchita Gaeen be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. (Prafulla.C.Pant.,J) Dt. 11.08.2010 NP