MC 886/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AC UPADHYAY Heard Mr GN Sahewalla, the learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms Senapati, th e learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr N Choudhury, the learned co unsel for the respondent No. 3. It is stated by the learned senior counsel that the respondent No. 2 is not a fo rmal party. However, the impleadment of the respondent No. 2 as party responden t appears to be inconsistent with the law laid down by the Apex Court. The resp ondent No. 2 is accordingly deleted as a party respondent in this case. The Registry is to make necessary and consequential correction in the cause titl e. The application is for restoring the connected writ appeal, which was dismissed in default of prosecution on 4.3.2011. As the application is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents, the application is allowed. Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of.