IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Criminal Appeal No.^L'2- /2010. ^j^, APPELLANTS: 1. Dharamram @ Dharam @ Ghuran, (InJail) son of Kashiram Panika, aged about 42 years, Occupation Driver. ^o ^^ \j^o^'^^.'u' * 2. Anil @ Anil Kumar Das, son of Dharam ...•''"IA ',^^\\^''"'r Das Panika, aged about 21 years, ^ ^"^\^^ . ."'^T^V^^ 8-^ occupation Student, residence village ^^A.--' r^ Tinadfai Chirmiri, Police Station Chirmiri, w District Korea, Chhattisgarh. Versus Respondent: State of Chhattisgarh, Through Potice Station Lakhanpur, Sarguja, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374/2) OFCODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE. 1973. -i y .U! \w 3?n^T ^»T^Jcb WITSTT^T^RW ^ • ^^ '^ ^ Tumane *II*<CTI <i»*ii<n T^T r<ii&iKn<li, ^Tii<-i<i<o, fs|<rii-<-i'j,< . <3-.A.^^>(<-J^ /^fo "C?A~T^200 31T^T TRRT (^cif^<^) (s'wittTC ^fta 3TT^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan e»ii<<fci<flwiTn1ET^Tt ^ fe^t <P»i^$i< ^'sfRms^rT^T Shrivastava. J. 27-09-2010 Shri C. P. Lahre, counsel for th|e appellants. Shri A. K. Shukla, Panel Lawy^r for the State. Heard. Learned counsel for the appeplants submitted that the appeltants have already filed an appeal against flhe impugned judgment of conviction and order of-sentence, which is regi^tered as Criminal Appeai No.365 of 2010 and this appeal has been inadv^rtently filed. Office note shows that the earltier appeal (Criminal Appeal No.365 of 2010) has been dismissed on 01-0f-2010. At this stage, learned cour] withdrawal of the instant appeal with for restoration ofthe appeal which wa| isel for the appellants prays tor liberty to take appropriate measures 5 filed in the earlier point oftime. As prayed, the instant criminaf appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No such liberty is necessary. This or<per shall not come in the way of the appeltants for taking appropriate step^ in accordance with law. Sd/- Mauindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^i^Cin ^-5JN ^p^T^-, (f-^'<^:r -/-F'S./S47—2^030-1,00,000,