IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.12911 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 22, 2011. Nahar Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged stoppage of the payment of pension and other retiral dues to him including the gratuity without issuing any show cause notice. The petitioner has, however, admitted in the writ petition that he is facing trial in a criminal case under the Prevention of Corruption Act. In these circumstances, though there appears to be some justification for the respondents to with-hold the retiral dues of the petitioner, however, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 18.11.2010 (Annexure P-3) said to have been CWP No.12911 of 2011 [2] submitted by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 22, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE