IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.2941 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-14 ..Appellant. Vs. Rajkumar Sandeepkumar HUF ..Respondent. .... Ms Suchitra Kamble i/b Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. B.V. Jhaveri with Ms Priti Shukla for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. 20th January, 2010. P.C. : Counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue states that the first question which arises in the appeal is covered against the revenue by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in CIT v. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers Pvt. Limited ([2009] 310 ITR 421). Insofar as the second question is concerned, counsel appearing for the revenue states that it is covered against the revenue by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the Commissioner of Income Tax v. Varundevi Shorewala (ITA (L) 2487 of 2009 decided on 30th November, 2009). In the circumstances, no substantial question of law arises in the appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)