Narayaa prasad %dav,aged aibout 45 years» S/o ghri Agnuram %dav, Ass^tant Teaeheif, posted at Bal ashram Pat-halgaoa. Bistriat*-Jastipur , Chha-ttisgarb. i^<'y'".. ^^•"y"...-'' • ' PE'riiiosiBa c..v :,.<.°:.^ IH •EHE HXGH GGORT O? JUBICAW&E AT BIIASPUR (C.G.) WBIt PBTITICai N0. £oj OS- 2801 State o£ ehbattlsgaEb, ; Ihrougb fhe Seeretary Bepartineat o£ 'I'ribal mlfare . D.K.Buiidings, Baipur* Colleetor* Kaigarh, District Saigarb. AssistaBfe eianaissioner< Tr.lba.l. Bevelopaeat* Raigaifti. Bloek aaueation OfficeE, i VUcas Khand Pat&algaon, Sistrict Jasbpur. S-bate Aaninistrativs Iribuaal, Baipur (GbbattisgaiA)* RESB'OHBEN'ES WKI'r PETI'CieaS VtmSB. AR2XCXBS 226/227 OF IHE QIXtSTI'SSTIBS ©E'.'iaSIA sn^i^i R-)i+ 3H^?I sh^tl^ •Mt?a 2.5.2001 e l - 0!!! 3H^?T 'V305 (.yS'^'iSS) an^i ^giw 'rfttt Shri Prashant Mishra the petitioner. Dr.K.K.Shukla, learn' respondents. learnea eoynsel for ^d Dy.A.G. for the Madb^a Sbri Hishra learraed petit.i.oner si.ibBiits tbat unjusttfied in making tbj order iropugned that tbe of tbe school had.-forged) to bim, the order on wbi) was dated 24.7.1999 arad Seeretary, SCate o£ Education Departmen-t. H( the said Deputy Secretar|s directions ^iven by the the 'deparCTent, but the held tbat tbe petitloner| letter dated 24.7.1999 by the chlef Seere'bary the Principal o£tbe the letter of the Si that letter dated 24.7.' Principal Secretary. H^ because o£ .tbe tbe petitioner has been to face serious schlool lecreflary 9l9 etoserva.tllons cons equ^aces chl^T<11<<iT1 'RFT^ff ^f 'fS1^ <[<ii-(^.l< ^siPgtTan^r -&~"1: iounsel for the frhe Trlbunal was tfe observations in tbe fcetitioner or Principal soine order. Aceording .|2h'rell.ance was placed ^as issued Uy tbe Depaty Pradesh, School Ife fiirther submlts that rly had referred to certain jprincipal Secretary o£ •ribanal has wrongly was relying upon the ajlleged -to be issu ed He submits that ia fact after inisreading quoted in bis OE.der was issued by the furtbee sdbmits that, made by tbeTribiuaal |saspended and t»e is litsely Dr« Sh^kia, learned v GRPRJ—FS/311—1/2001—50,000. :t ...riff ^- S-i55 —C-J: ORDERSHEET THBCOURT. Date&f arderor i Proeeedmg Q^er orPFOceeding witb agnature ofRcesidisg OfQcer .of 199 Deputy Afivocate ©eneral,referring to paras 13, 14 and 18 of the order impugned sutem.l.ts piiiat the Trlbunal Was aBsolutely justlfied in holjdlng that tbe pet-i.tioner had fprged the alleged letter. In our opinj.on, tbe petitloBer must filfe a review petltion before ,fche 1'rtbuna^>ringii|g to theaa notl.ee of the learnedMember o£ itb^ Tribunal that letter Anaexure-P/5 was issue4 by the Deputy Secretary- and it was referrln^ to certain instruGtions of the PrinGipal Secretary aneK'the Prlriel.pal crf the School aafl prctoably mlsreading tfae letter o£ tbe Beputy Seeretary recorded In his 3e tter that be was issaing orders in aceerclaace wi'lf.h ^..iwc-i^^ the dtreetioiis o£ the ehJ.ef/Seerefcary. The petitioner is free to approach ttie Trlbunal with a review petition. The petition is dl.spesed o£. C.C. to parties on payraent. SigBatuteof ^artiesor FIeageis wfeere aeeessaEy -(^_ Sd/- Chief Justice .^•..JL Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge lli