IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44516 of 2008 BADRI RAI, son of Sahdeo Rai, resident of village Mohammadpur Tola Dumma, P.S. Keshariya, District – East Champaran Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 09.02.2009 Heard. The case has been registered under sections 364 and 366A of the I.P.C. Story is that the accused persons acting so as to fulfill the wishes of co accused Jitendra Rai, abducted the lady Madhu Kumari so as to getting her married to Ram Naresh Rai, a brother of Jitendra Rai. The contentions are manifold like, offence under section 364 of the I.P.C. is not made out and that section 366A IPC is also not attracted. The further contention was that other similarly situated accused Chandar Rai and Baidyanath Rai have been admitted to bail by this court. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor resisted the prayer for bail by submitting that the lady has supported the story of being abducted for the purpose of being married to said Ram Naresh Rai. He also drew the attention of the court towards the medical report which indicated that the lady had been sexually assaulted. Defence is also of the lady herself eloping with accused Ram Naresh Rai and changing her stands in pressure. Be that as it may, considering the orders granting bail to similarly situated accused aforementioned, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) - 2 - with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge FTC III, East Champaran at Motihari in Kesaria P.S. Case no. 84 of 2007 (S.T. No. 618 of 2008). Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)