IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-28197 of 2008 (O/M). Date of Decision : November 10, 2009. Rajbir Singh ...... Petitioner(s). Versus. State of Punjab and others. ..... Respondent(s). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. K.S. Kahlon, Advocate, for the petitioner (s). Mr. C.S. Brar, D.A.G. Punjab, for the respondent-State. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for respondent-State, on instructions from H.C. Darbara Singh, Police Station Patti, states that the cancellation report was filed before the learned Area Magistrate, Patti. On a protest petition filed by the petitioner/complainant, the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patti, has not agreed with the cancellation report and has directed for re- investigation of the case. In the light of the fact that the Magistrate has ordered re- investigation of the case, counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage. However, he submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner, if at subsequent stage, police does not investigate the matter properly, the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action. With liberty aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed at this stage. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE November 10, 2009. sjks.