{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.568 OF 2009 Nurji Janglya Padvi PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.S.Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr.N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 2nd September 2009 PER COURT: 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not pressing for the reliefs at prayer clause “B” and “C” of the petition and only restricts relief in so far as prayer clause “A” is concerned. In the light of that, therefore, the petition is dismissed in respect of the reliefs in prayer clause “B” and “C”. Since only relief at prayer clause “A” is pressed in this petition, registry to register this petition as civil writ petition and thereafter to place the same before appropriate Bench. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/cwp568-9