IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18165 of 2010 PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN BIND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7/ 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is alleged for torture for demand of dowry. Defence is that complainant was living in adultery with brother-in-law for that divorce case was filed and before appearance in that case, this complaint is filed to create a defence but in the instant case on request of petitioner, notice was issued to have some talk but refusal by the petitioner was the result appears corroboration of the alleged torture not entitling petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)