-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.4 OF 2008 PETITION NO.4 OF 2008 PETITION NO.4 OF 2008 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1375 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1375 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1375 OF 2005 Ramchandra Jiwaji Deodhar (since deceased his legal hieris and representatives) ...Petitioners vs. Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for the Applicant Mr.R.M.Pethe i/b Mr.R.G.Ketkar for Respondent No.1 Mr.Atul Damale for Respondent No.2. Mr.Amogh Parlikar for Respondent No.3 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. D.B.BHOSALE,J. D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2008. : JUNE 20, 2008. : JUNE 20, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The petitioners have filed this Application seeking Review of the order dated 4th July 2007. Mr.Deshmukh, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that though the submissions in respect of section 139 (1) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act,1949 were quoted in the order dated 4.7.2007, they have not been dealt with. I have perused the order. I find no merit in the contentions urged by Mr.Deshmukh. In the order dated 4th July 2007 this court has recorded the reasons for dismissing the Second Appeal after considering the submissions advanced by the learned Counsel for the Appellants. No case is made out for review. Review Petition is rejected. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE