IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23458 of 2011 Anuj Prasad, Son of Dayanand Sao, Resident of Village Saksohra, P.S. Saksohra, District Patna. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 08/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1276 (C) of 2008 for the offences punishable under Section 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with general allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc., in spite of being blessed with three children in nine years of wedlock and all the four (complainant and her three children) are residing at parents place of the complainant. Submission is that petitioner still intends to resume and continue the matrimonial life with the complainant and their children and to further strengthen his intention, offers to pay a sum of Rs. 1,200/- (One Thousand Two Hundred Only) per month to the complainant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court/authority. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing of an application before the court below stating such intentions as stated above, in the event of his arrest/surrender 2 before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1276 (C) of 2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)