IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50050 of 2008 RAVINDRA RAWAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 304B, 498A of the Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission on behalf of the petitioner, the father- in-law is that the allegations admit that he was not present on the date of suicide. The allegations are for demand of dowry. Whether it be Section 306 or 304B of the Penal Code is hardly relevant. In today’s world of modern communication, the physical absence is hardly relevant. The application is dismissed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)