IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12866 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR SON OF LATE KAILASH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- NAUZAR GHAT, DIWAN MOHALLA, P.O.- JHAUGANJ, P.S. KHAJKALA, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, LAND RECORDS AND MEASUREMENT (BHU ABHILEKH AND PARIMAP) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, BIHAR SURVEY OFFICE, GULZARBAGH, DISTRICT- PATNA 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that his father retired in the year 1983 while working as a Press Attendant in the office of the respondent no.4 and later died on 18th December, 1993. Thereafter mother of the petitioner started receiving the family pension and continued to receive the same till her death on 1st July, 2004. It is submitted that the petitioner is physically handicapped and as per the Government’s decision which has been reiterated in the letter no. 4112 dated 21st December, 2006 written by the Treasury Officer, Patna to the respondent no.4. The petitioner after the death of her mother has no source of income and till date no sanction order has been issued for payment of the handicapped family pension. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 with copy to the respondent nos. 4 & 5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)