In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No. 12643 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2011 Bachittar Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that respondent No.3 is sleeping over the complaints (Annexures P-1 and P-2), therefore, he may be directed to decide the complaints (Annexures P-1 and P-2). Without expressing any opinion on the merit or the maintainability of the complaints (Annexures P-1 and P-2), respondent No.3 is directed to take a decision on Annexures P-1 and P-2, in accordance with law, if Annexures P-1 and P-2 are legally maintainable, at the earliest. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 20.07.2011 sk.