§§N§LEI $E§§$H @ $ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) Nogoqu 0f 2010 ETITIONER : (émt. Sheel'a Dubey, Wife 'of Shri 'R. Dubey, aged about 44 years, Assistant , Teacher, ' Government Primary Schocl (BOYS), Fingeshwar, Block Fingeshwar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus ESPbNDENTs :1 /The State of Chhét‘tisgakh through Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, :3) ”ahandrashekhar Mishra, son of' not known, Teacher' , . Government Middle School, £ Beltukri, Block Fingeshwar, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE " CONSTITUTION OF INDIK I P / ’ R G.E.Road, 'Raipur (Chhattisgarh) :2) District Education Officer, Raipur, “District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Wmw’PC5) 504a/1o H1200 m'm (Win) WWW mmm mmafsam W;Wm'fiwm ‘ %a1%mw%m Counsel for the pefitionelr refemed i0 the gradaficm Eist {annexure P- 1} from which it is found. that the peiiticner is placed over a11d-above the respondent No.3. Ii is also stated. in the petition that ihe petitioner holde qualification of M.A., B.Ed. a11d belongs to general category. Further contention of the petitioner is that he has neve1 been communicated with any adverse remark nor any Deparlmental Enquiry is pending and I tili date he has not been punishid by thEt depaxtmsmt. in View of the averment de in thls petition it appears that junior to the petitioner has been promoted. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to Withtlraw this petition with liberty to file re resentation before respondent. No.2. He further submits t x: ‘ \ SB : HGE‘PBLE MR. JKISTECE PRFFENKER DEWAKER 93.99.2010 ! Shli KS. Pawar comwd fc y the pef'it oner. 'Smt, Smite; Ghai, P.L:f0y 1he Statm $ Grievancs of tha petition“? is that though me petitionar has preferreé areprcsemation aggrieved by her sugersession, the same has not been decided til‘i date. . aimost in similar facts and circumstances? this Court las passed th4e order dated 23.8.2010 {Annexure e5; in W.P.(S) No. 4745/2010 and considering the said. order, the . espondent No.2 may be directed a h t WWWW mm..m££§; (OW/o 7% 111 zoo mm (Wu) WWW WWW WW WWR mmm ‘ *Wm € to decide the representation of me petit£oner m accordailce with law. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to Withdraw this petition with Eberty to file praper representah‘oa before the respondent N02 within three weeks from the date of receiyt of copy of this order and in tma it is expectexi from the competent authoriiy to decide the representation as expeditiously as possible preferably withiiq three months from the date of receipt of copy of the said representation. If grievance of the petitioter is not redressed, it wou1d be. open to the petitioner to take recourse to such remetiy as availabie to him under the law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ¥ “Ll:€*