1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.191 OF 2010 Dighi Koli Samaj Bombay Rahivashi Sangh ...Petitioner. v. Shri A. Senthil Vel & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. C.K.Bhangoji i/by R.K.Mendadkar ,advs. For the Petitioner. Ms Rutuja Ambekar ,adv. For the Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. A.I.I.Patel, AGP for the R.Nos.2 and 4. Ms Samindia Surve a/w Shri Nirav Shah i/by M/s. Little and Co., advs. For the R.No.6. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JULY 21, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard. By the impugned order dated 9th July, 2009 in P.I.L. No.42 of 2009, Division Bench of this Court had directed the respondents to ensure that the water supply scheme should be fully implemented within a period of six months. Contempt Petition was filed by the original petitioner contending that the said order was not complied. However, the learned counsel for the respondents have pointed out that in Civil Application No.1 of 2011 taken out in the said P.I.L.No. 42 of 2009, Division Bench has passed an order on 21st January, 2011 granting permission to issue work order for installation of Water Supply Scheme by 15th February, 2011 and installation of Water Supply Scheme 2 shall be completed and will be made fully operational within 18 months from the date of issuance of the work order. It means period for compliance of the original order has been extended upto 15th August, 2012. In view of this, question of taking action for contempt does not arise 2 In the result contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)