CWP(T) No. 9843 of 2008. 22.12.2009. Present: Mr. P.P.Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Bansal, Addl. A.G. for the respondents. CWP(T) No. 9843 of 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner was engaged as beldar on 1.1.1990, thereafter he was engaged as work inspector on 3.2.1996. The petitioner has been regularized as beldar on 10.1.2003. The petitioner was engaged on two assignments for different periods. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that on this point a Division Bench of this court has given a verdict, and, therefore, the petitioner intends to file a representation to the competent authority and a direction be given to the competent authority to decide the representation within some reasonable time. The prayer of the petitioner has not been opposed. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of with the direction that petitioner is at liberty to file a representation to the competent authority regarding his grievance for regularization on the post of work inspector within a period of four weeks and from the date of receipt of such representation alongwith a copy of this order, the competent authority shall decide the representation by a speaking order within a further period of six weeks with due notice to the petitioner. In case decision on the representation of petitioner goes against the petitioner, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the court on the same cause of action. The petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. December 22, 2009. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge.