1 CRA-500-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 500 OF 2010 Shri Parashuram Vitthal Nazare ... Applicant (Orig. accused) Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respnodents None for the applicant. Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the respondent No.1 State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 15th April, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the applicant. 2. There is a conflicting report from the Police Inspector Ichalkaranji and the letter from the Superintendent of Police. The letter from the Superintendent to the Police Inspector shows that the summons for service on respondent No.2 were received and sent to the Police Inspector. However, the report from the Police Inspector shows that his office has never received the summons and, therefore, could not be served. Now the notice be served and report be submitted within 8 weeks. 2 CRA-500-10.sxw 3. The applicant is permitted to serve the respondent No.2 by RPAD/Speed Post/Courier and to file an affidavit of service within 8 weeks. If the affidavit is not filed, the application shall stand dismissed in default. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)