HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.11287 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and with their consent, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner states that shop No.34 in the Complex bearing Door No.4-142 and 4-143 constructed by Sathupally Nagara Panchayat has been leased out in his favour by registered lease deed dated 21.11.2009 executed by the second respondent and the lease is for a period of three years up to 30.07.2012. He is running a tea stall in the said shop. It is stated that at the instance of Councillor, Gram Panchayat, has passed a resolution to widen Ayyagaripeta road on which the complex constructed by the Gram Panchayat is located. It is stated that if the road is widened, the shop of the petitioner would be demolished. It is further stated that although he has not violated the terms and conditions of the lease deed, the respondent No.2 is taking steps to evict him and demolish the shop. 3. It is to be noted that the petitioner is only a lessee and one of the shops in the complex is admittedly constructed by the Gram Panchayat. Whether the Gram Panchayat has passed any resolution to demolish the building complex in order to widen the road and whether such a resolution is illegal or not the issues in the writ petition, since no such resolution is under challenge in this writ petition. Suffice it to state that the petitioner is a mere lessee and at his instance road widening, if any, taken up cannot be stopped. However, as the petitioner has the subsisting lease and running business for livelihood, he cannot be thrown out abruptly. It is, therefore, directed that without adequate notice, the petitioner shall not be evicted from the premises. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ 12th May 2010 kvr