IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21494 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ P.J.CHACKO, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.JACOB, RESIDING AT PITTAPILLILL HOUSE, KADAVOOR P.O., POTHANICAUD. BY ADV. SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR SMT.V.SHYLAJA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21494 OF 2009 (F) ===================== Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that against Ext.P3 order issued under Section 68 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, he and other Directors of the Kadavoor Service Co-operative Bank Limited have filed appeal before the respondent. It is stated that pursuant to Ext.P4 notice of hearing, the appeal was heard by the respondent on 17/6/2009. It is stated that despite the hearing as above, orders have not been passed. Complaining delay in the disposal of the appeal, this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the appeal filed by him and others against Ext.P3 has already been heard and orders have been reserved, there is no reason why orders should not be passed without any inordinate delay. 3. Taking into account the averment of the petitioner that the appeal was heard on 17/6/2009, I direct that if the said averment is factually correct, the respondent shall pass orders on the appeal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 WPC 21494/09 :2 : weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp