IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-8622 of 2009 Date of decision: July 29, 2009 Ram Dayal & others -Petitioners Versus State of Haryana -Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral) Mr. Sharma submits that petitioners No.2 & 3 have been roped in the case only to put pressure. According to counsel, allegations levelled in the FIR are mainly against petitioner No.1, qua whom application for anticipatory bail has already been dismissed as withdrawn. Otherwise also, in the facts & circumstances of the case, petitioner No.1 is not entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Abhey Ram submits that petitioners No.2 & 3 have already joined the investigation pursuant to order dated 2nd April, 2009. Under the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed qua petitioners No.2 & 3 namely Bhurwai & Rinku and the interim order dated April 2, 2009 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. [Rajan Gupta] Judge July 29, 2009. 'ask'