- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.152 OF 2004 Smt.Indrapatidevi alias Indra Ambikaprasad Pandey. Petitioner Vs. Maa Bharti Education Society & Ors. Respondents -- Shri Shaikh Nasir Masih i/b M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the petitioner. Shri N.V.Bandiwadekar with Shri Dilip Bodke for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Shri S.N.Gawade, AGP for respondent No.6. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J DATED : 23rd NOVEMBER, 2004. P.C. 1. Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of the order dated 20th June, 2003 passed by the School Tribunal directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner within 40 days, the petitioner has not been reinstated in the service. Undisputedly, subsequent to the said order, the respondents have filed the Writ Petition No.8609 of 2003 wherein there has been direction to maintain status quo. Consequently, the question of enforcement - 2 - of the order dated 20th June, 2003 passed by the School Tribunal, at this stage, does not arise. 2. In addition thereto, in view of the decision passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Mohammad Salam Anamul Haque v. S.A.Azmi & Ors., Mohammad Salam Anamul Haque v. S.A.Azmi & Ors., Mohammad Salam Anamul Haque v. S.A.Azmi & Ors., reported in 2001(1) Mah.L.J. 249, the question of initiating contempt proceedings for non-compliance of the order passed by the School Tribunal does not arise at all. Hence, the proceedings are disposed of and dropped as being rejected. The notice stands discharged. -----