:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1079 0F 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1079 0F 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1079 0F 2007 Archana Arvind Tulsulkar, Petitioner. Vs Lazaras Elias Rodrix & ors Respondents. Mr M.D.Parab, for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 4TH JULY, 2007 DATED : 4TH JULY, 2007 DATED : 4TH JULY, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition is directed against concurrent findings recorded by the three authorities below in R.T.S.proceedings. A disputed entry appears to have been made in pursuance of the orders passed by the Civil Court in R.C.S.No.40 of 1993 holding the registered sale-deed dated 28.4.1980 in favour of respondent no.1 as valid and legal. I find no reason to interfere with such order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. If the petitioner has any right in the property it is always open for him to adopt appropriate proceedings in the court of law. This writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.Bhosale,J.)