IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34010 of 2011 Bimli Devi wife of Parsuram Mandal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 17.10.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is only circumstantial evidence against the petitioner and he is in custody since 21.10.2009 and undertakes to be physically present on each date during trial, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. 3rd, Purnea in connection with S.T. No.167 of 2010 arising out of Amour P.S. Case No.126 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Chaman Lal Mandal, brother-in-law of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if she is - 2 - she shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner shall be physically present on each date during trial and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, her bail shall stand automatically cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )