%^ k ^ HG—7S ^T W Is.-li* «fl7%?iaiirw *IIHWI %*n^ TSf "t)|q|(nq, ®t|)yi<c,fsjdl+iy L^-PLs^ /^o-^Li'S^ sn^r T^T (lici^'si<SS?) TOIIW ^fsg sn^i PETITIONER Sint.1 Meena Siagh aged about 52 years, W/o of $hri Sbivinaagal Singh, Rcsidcat of Prim|ary School, North Jhagrakhand, Dist^ict-Korea (CG) RESPONDBNTS 1. Sta Dep^artinent D.Kl 2. 3. The Kon 4. S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRANDRA MISHRA. J. 30.09.2008 <^T<rf^fh^ ^TFRff '^f tS^ T^H^TC ^aifirElsii^r Versus of Chhattisgarh, through -Secretary, of School Education, Maatralaya, S. Bhawau, Raipur (CO) Prii<iary Thit tidyc Korfc, Thej Penbiou Distaict Education Officer, Korea, District- ;a, C.G. School North Jhagarakhand, >ugfa Headinaster, Siaghi CoUieiy 'atiou Socicty, iJhagarakhaad, Distt.- :a (CG) Director, Directorate, PubUc Institution, Bada, Raipur (CG) Writ Petitioa U/A 236/227 ofthe Coastitution oflndia Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dyl Shri R.K. JaiswaJ, coilnsel for the petitioner. GA for the State. Heard. Wifh the consent oftl^e parties, the matter is heaid finaUy. By this petition, th^ petitioner, who is working as Assistant Teacher hi Primary Schoo|, Jhagrakhaad, Dista'ict-Korea is claimiag the benefifs df 5th Pay Coi|imission at par with their counterparts ia the Goverainent Schools. Tjhe 5th Pay Cominission was to be granted •w jTS:t»;tnCSttlBB!ai |||iin.| |!""-n'i?rinr-j',:--: .-<£s—» —78 'ysi -<ii-4i(y)q, a'lal'M'ie, [»«v)iy^< WqcffWqRl [f2^N? TTawfi sf^v Tra^T (ljcif^<^T) wnw^f^faii^r 2L with effect from 1.1.1996 4i accordauce with the Madhya Pradesh RevisionofPay Rules, 1998. This Court by fhe judg^nent aad oider dated 6.2.2007 in the case ofSmt. A LaU Vs. State of <|;hhattis^»haad otfaer cormected matters (W.P. No.4108 of 2005) held) aided schools are eatitled foi) Pav Couunission. After the ffled this petition on 25.9.204 respondents authorities, whi' pending cousideration befo^ authorities are accorduigly dated 2.8.2008 (Annexure accordance wifh law, on its] <vwifi<Ai 'WRff'? 'test <pii^i< ^iaffimsn^CT that the teachers working in GoveiTQinent fhe benefit of recommendations of fhe 5th decision of this Court, the petitioner has )8 claimiag the same relief. Leamed couasel appe^ring for the petitioner submits that fhe petitiouer has niade represe^itation ou 2.8.2008 (Aanexure P-2) to the :h was not considered at atl. In view of fhe fact fb^t fhe representation of ttie petitioner is e authority concemed, the respondents directed to cousider her representation 3-2) pending before respondent No.l in own nierits, in the light of the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 pa^sed by this Coiut in the inatter ofSmt. A LaM (Supra). The petition is accordi^igly disposed of. •-s' ^ ^^ ^^^ lEin'inramwwanf ,11 ^^^-^TT'^-H' ^^K _o& ^i ifT »ia^^ WTOtSttBBiTO^SBlR