IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3121 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3121 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3121 of 2006 IN IN IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.2 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.2 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.2 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3120 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3120 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3120 of 2006 IN IN IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.3 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.3 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.3 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3122 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3122 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3122 of 2006 IN IN IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.4 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.4 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.4 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3123 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3123 of 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3123 of 2006 IN IN IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.5 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.5 OF 2006 SALES TAX APPLICATION (LODG.) NO.5 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Sales Tax ..Applicant. V/s. Blue Chip Tex Fuel Industries Ltd. ..Respondents. Mr.Vinay Sompal for applicant in all the Motions. Mrs.N.R.Bhadeka for respondent in all the Motions. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 13TH OCTOBER, 2006. DATED : 13TH OCTOBER, 2006. DATED : 13TH OCTOBER, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- All these Motions seek condonation of delay in filing the applications. The delay in all these matters is of 5 days. It is explained by the affidavit filed by the Dy.Commissioner of Sales Tax (Court Matters). A reply has been filed by one Mr.Nand - = : 2 : = - Khemani to oppose the motions and Mrs.Bhadeka appearing for respondents has submitted that the delay should not be condoned. 2. We have perused the affidavits in support as well as the one in reply. In our view, the affidavit in support given sufficient explanation as to why the application could not be filed within the period of limitation provided. All the Motions are, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay condoned. Applications be numbered. 3. All the Notice of Motions disposed of accordingly. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)