IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 2771 of 2010 Jyoti .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. P.K. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner had earlier filed a Civil Writ Petition No. 12039 of 2009 before this Court to challenge the action of the respondents in denying her the appointment to the post of Guest Teacher in Chemistry. As per the petitioner, her application was not accepted by the respondents. It was also stated that the post was not properly advertised. While disposing of that writ petition, this court had noticed that District Education Officer (DEO) was seized of the infirmity and liberty was granted to the petitioner to represent her grievance before the DEO, who was directed to pass an appropriate order. As per the counsel, order Annexure P-7, therefore, was passed to the effect that the entire selection/appointment was quashed. This order subsequently was reviewed and the impugned order, Annexure P-8 was passed. Annexure P-8 has been passed pursuant to the direction issued by this Court earlier passed in CWP No. 12039 of 2009. The DEO has gone through the merits and Civil Writ Petition No. 2771 of 2010 -2- demerits of the case. DEO found that the petitioner failed to produce evidence in support of the grievance so her application was not accepted. Mr. Nehra would make reference to the inquiry held in this regard, which was then relied upon by the DEO to pass the impugned order. Primarily, it is a dispute relating to the factual controversy, which had been determined and decided by the DEO. No interference as such is called for. Dismissed. September 01, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE