Criminal Misc. No. M- 10769 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M- 10769 of 2009 Date of Decision: 1.5.2009 Didar Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Ms. Gagan Geet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Ashok Goyal, Advocate for the complainant. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present petition has been preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 97 dated 27.3.2009 registered at Police Station City, Tohana, District Fatehabad, under Sections 285, 452 & 506 IPC and 25, 27, 54, & 59 of the Arms Act. On 22.04.2009, this Court had passed the following order:- “Grievance made by the complainant is that sister of the complainant had instituted a case under Sections 498-A & 406 IPC against the Criminal Misc. No. M- 10769 of 2009 2 petitioner-husband. Paramjit Kaur had to depose in a divorce case against her husband-petitioner on the day of occurrence. It is alleged that she was restrained not to depose as she had not agreed. Accused/petitioner had come to the house of petitioner and had fired two shots. Counsel further submits that in the present case no injury has been caused. Such a bald allegation that two shots had been fired outside the house can be levelled by anybody. Issue notice of motion to learned Advocate General, Haryana, for 1.5.2009. At this stage, Mr. Ashok Goyal, Advocate, has caused appearance for the complainant. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, petitioner(s) shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. Petitioner(s) shall join investigation as and when called for. Petitioner(s) shall also abide by the conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” Counsel for the State, on instructions from Subhash Chander, Assistant Sub Inspector, stated that petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State and order dated 22.4.2009 passed by this Court, interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner is affirmed till filing of the report under Section Criminal Misc. No. M- 10769 of 2009 3 173 Cr.P.C. On submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. petitioner shall furnish regular bail-bonds to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. With the observations made above, the present petition is disposed off. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge May 1, 2009 “DK”