IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35346 of 2009 NARAYAN PRASAD son of Late Hari Nandan Prasad, resident of Registry Office, Mahua, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner had earlier approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail which was refused as per the order dated 19.11.2008 vide Annexure-1. It is submitted that the petitioner is a scribe and he has been implicated in this case although the complainant and the party to the deed have compromised and there remains no dispute. It is further submitted that the complainant has compromised with this petitioner as well which would appear from Annexure-3. It is further contended that one co-accused has been allowed anticipatory bail as per the order contained in Annexure-4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1987 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)