WP(C) 2630/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. D. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. D. Sai kia, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents. Appearing on behalf of the respondents, Mr. Saikia, learned counsel, has submitted that pursuant to some complaints received by the respondents/authorit ies concerned, an enquiry has been made into the selection process, which had be en conducted pursuant to the advertisement, in question, and having found some a nomalies in the conduct of the selection process, the select list has been cance lled and the respondents/authorities concerned have taken a decision to hold sel ection process afresh and that all the candidates, who had applied in the earlie r selection process and were found eligible, would be allowed to participate. In view of the submissions noted above, Mr. Baruah, learned counsel, submits tha t the petitioner does not want to proceed with the writ petition. This writ peti tion, therefore, stands closed with liberty granted to the petitioners to approa ch this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.