IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16200 of 2010 HABIB ALAM @ BABLOO, SON OF ABDUL RAHMAN RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- QR. NO.14, SAMANPURA, POLICE STATION SHASTRINAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections-385, 386, 34 of the Penal Code against the subscriber of one mobile number and the other land line number given in the First Information Report itself. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is neither the subscriber of the mobile number nor of the land line number. It is also submitted that during investigation it transpired that the two numbers belong to Md. Khalid and Santosh and petitioner is being dragged in the case as it is said that he is friend of Md. Khalid. Let petitioner surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below and if the court below is satisfied from the materials collected in the case diary that petitioner is not connected with either the mobile number or the land line number refereed to in the First Information Report then the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.354 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. Until such satisfaction is made by the court below no coercive steps be taken against the - 2 - petitioner. it is however, made clear that the moment it comes to light that petitioner is owner of either the mobile number or the land line number the bail allowed to him be cancelled and he be taken in custody forthwith. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)