IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsP Writ Petition (under Art. 227) No.3143 bf 2010 Rajput Kahstriya Mahila Samaj; Registration No.S/R. District Raipur/307 House No.48/324, Lohar Chowk, Purani Basti, Raipur (CG) (wrongly typed as Lolar Chowk), through its Secretary Smt. Mamta Rajput, W/o Shri Gulab Singh Rajput, aged about 40 years, R/o Near Danteshwari Mandir, Kushalpur, Raipur(CG) PETITIONER: -Versus- 1. Basant Kumar Thakur, Slo Chanduiai Thakur, aged about 62 years, R/o Shanti Chowk, Purani Basti, Raipur ' Khedulal Pandel, aged about 70 years, S/o late Kunjlal Pandel, R/o Lohar Chowk, Purani Basti, Raipur (CG) (wrongiy typed as Lolar Chowk) Urmila Pandei, aged about 40 years, W/o Jagmohan Pandel, R/o Lohar Chowk, Raipur (CG) Shobha Chouhan, W/o Sanjay Chouhan, aged about 30 years, Archana Pandel, D/o Khedulal Pandel, aged about 27 years, Ashaial Pandel, D/o Khedula Pandel, aged about 24 years, Raja Pandel, S/o Khedulal Pandel, aged about 18 years Resp. No.4a to 4d are R/o Lohar Chowk, Purani Basti, Raipur (CG) Smt. Tara Tiiwar, aged about 45 years, R/o Lohar Chowk, Raipur (CG) Smt. Laxmi Pandel, aged about 50 years, W/o Bharat Pandel, R/o Lohar Chowk, Raipur (CG) RESPONDENTS: Present: ‘ Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Sin Ie Bench: Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra J. t \ / , ORAL ORDER f (2-7-2010) H u l \ ‘\ . By the instant petition, the petitioner has impugned the order of Annexure-P/1 whereby learned 9‘“ Civil Judge, Class-2, Raipur has rejected the application of the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the CPC for impleading the petitioner as defendant in the suit filed by respondent No.1 . , fter going through the impugned order and the reasons assigned for A rejecting the application, it is seen that the application has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner society itself was registered after institution of the suit and the application was filed after 9 years of the institution of the suit in the year 2010. in the circumstances, i flnd no illegality, infirmity or jurisdictional error committed by the court below in the impugned order warranting interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia. Barve . The petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/— g Dhirendra Mishra Judge V} i l L l l l l / .