BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14229 of 2011 1. AROCKIARAJ 2. PRAVEEN 3. PIPET 4. NISHANTH 5. KARUPPAN @ PRADEEP 6. SAHUNTHALA 7. ARPUTHAM 8. PRASANTH : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2,4 to 10 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALGUDI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.424 OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDI Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused Nos.2,4 to 10 in Cr.No.424 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant and his son. They sustained only simple injury and after treatment, they have been now discharged. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to previous enmity, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners are entitled for anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the fact that the injured have been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions: 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. Sd/- 01/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, LALGUDI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LALGUDI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.37515 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14229 of 2011 Date :01/11/2011 NSV/3.11.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/