FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS __________________________________________________________________________________________ 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10145 OF 2011 ,In FAST/19067/2011 CHAGANBAI BABURAOL WAGH AND ORS VERSUS SANDEEP ROADWAYS TRANSPORT COMPANY AND ORS ... Advocate for applicants : Mr. Kudale Bhagwan S. Advocate for Respondent 3 : Mr. S.V. Kulkarni ... CORAM : A. V. POTDAR, J. Dated: November 16, 2011 ... PER COURT : 1. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 absent even though duly served. 2. By present application applicants have prayed to condone delay in preferring appeal against the judgment and award passed by the Civil Judge, Sr.Dn., Beed in Workmens Compensation Case No. 7/2000 dated 4-12-2004. 3. Perusal of the impugned judgment shows that the award is passed against respondent nos. 1 and 2 and insurance company was exonerated and the petition was dismissed against insurance FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS __________________________________________________________________________________________ company. Perusal of the contentions raised in the application discloses that the applicants are not aware about the remedy available to them under law. It appears to be satisfactory explanation. 4. In view of this, delay stands condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘A’ and ‘B’. It is hereby made clear that even though delay is condoned, applicants will not be entitled to interest, if any, in case the applicants succeed in first appeal. With this clarification, application stands disposed of. Registry to register the accompanied first appeal. ( A. V. POTDAR, J. ) ... dyb