IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1126 of 2011 Prince Kumar @ Pinish Mahto @ Pinish Kumar son of Rameshwar Mahto, resident of village- Pir Nagar, P.S.- Naokothi and Distt- Begusarai. … Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .. Opp. Party. ------- For the Petitioner :Dr. Amrandra Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Udai Pratap Singh, APP ------- 2. 09.09.2011 The accused- petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the judgment dated 29th July 2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai in Cr. Appeal No.72 of 2010 by which the order dated 12.4.2010 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in Nawkothi P. S. Case No. 90 of 2008 (G.R. No. 3310 / 08) under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act has been confirmed and the appeal has been dismissed. The main contention of Learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a juvenile declared by the Juvenile Justice Board. He filed a petition for grant of bail which was rejected by the learned Juvenile Justice Board vide order dated 12.4.2010, whereafter he filed Cr. Appeal No. 2 72 of 2010 which has been dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge on the ground that the petitioner was arrested at the spot with firearms and ammunition to murder informant and witnesses of this case and he is involved in two other cases of murder and one case of extortion and attempt to murder. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.8.2008 and under the provision of Juvenile Justice Act maximum punishment for a juvenile is three years only. The petitioner has been in custody for more than three years in this case. Learned A.P.P. for the State could not controvert the contention of the petitioner while opposing the prayer. Considering the detention of the petitioner in custody, the impugned order is set aside. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in connection with Nawkothi P. S. Case No. 90 of 2008 (G. R. No. 3310/08) with 3 following conditions;- (i) One of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. (ii) The father of the petitioner will take care of the petitioner and he will produce the petitioner in the Court if and when required. In case of absence on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds would be liable to be cancelled. (iii) The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or in any other offence. (iv) In case of violation of the terms and conditions of bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the learned Juvenile Justice Board and he will be liable to be taken into custody. In the result, this revision application is allowed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)