P373 No: ® The Commissioner, , ‘s'. ifge€€wg" £510"‘ n) ( r. iO ‘4’ \~‘£.‘ i. Tribal Welfare Department \ 0‘ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, a Tribal Welfare Department .‘tl D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 4) Assistant Commissioner, Trib'al Welfare , Jagdalpur, Distt- Bastar (C.G.): The Collector, District Bastar at Jagdalpur (op). x 6) Thehgimk Education Officer, l ee Biockmakadi, Distt-eestar (C.G.) to A. Ga Ef?.-/’\'STUZ\'1 x. V 5 W“ j 3mm 3mm 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITI®N NO. \s"?$ I2005. L it PETITIONER Lakhiram Taram, S/gaukkuqw-Vwm i q ~aged about Lxoyears, a? o? v . Occupation- Service, Assistant Teacher‘(Tribal Department), i4 3&4 Primary School Udenga, Tribal Development Block Makadi, , (3‘9 < Distt. Bastar, (C.G.) Q Q‘. °g$ e: ."""( fs‘g’ sv‘°\\ ; ss‘e' VERSUS RESPONDENTS: / 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secreatry, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) CO\ (2) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE NSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 mm WW 27—4—2005 Shri Subhash Yadav, wunsel for The pe?i1'ioner. 5hri Sundeep Dubay, 5 A. for fhe 51'ufe/respnndenfsp Heard bo‘rh ‘Hae ccunse . The peTiTioner has erred This wr‘h‘ peTiTion under ArTicie 226/227 of fhe Consfi‘t‘ufion f India. The main grievanca 0 fhe pe‘ri’rioner is 'rhaf he is no? being reiieved‘by respondem No in compliance of The arder dafed 5-9- 2003 passed by The Cgmm onen Scheduled Tribes and Ssheduiad‘ ‘ €asfe's, Chha‘h‘isqarh. The case of fhe pei'iT oner is fha'f vide cr&er dad-ed 5—9-2003 fha pe‘rmoner was Tmn‘ ,er-red from Primary Schoo! Udenga, Devebpmen‘r Block Makad ’ DisTricT Easmr To hshmm Shuiap Jhadkarse, Developmenf Qio k burg Kondai, Disfricf Kanker. Afkr issuance of fhe Transfer o : 'rhe Eiec‘fion Commi5$ion of India has issued a no‘rificm‘ion for ate Tion of fhe Stufa Assambiy, Therefore, fhe pefifioner- was no? rdie ed. Even offer fhe elecfions are over, respondenf No.2 is no? r iieving The pe'rh‘ioner‘ l‘T hos been menfioned fhnf in fhe simii r sifuofion wrif pefi'rion No.3819/2004 " I, was filed by Dadurom O‘Hi ThaTThe peTiToner be reiieve and new he has been reiieved. A fore This Cour? and This Cour? direcfed p f . i i i i r I XI-HC—22 Bar‘ve HR . Sinae iimifed prayer ‘as been mada fhaf 1+ae pefi1ioner ba reiieved in pursuance of ‘fh fronsfer arder 5'a1'ed 5-9-2003, if is, fherefur‘e’,‘ directed fhu‘r if T a order is sfi“ in force and fhe same has no? been-uncalled, Then res onden? No.2 shal! relieve the pe‘rifianer‘ in arder‘ 1'0 enable him To join is &u1'ies a? The new piace. WHh “the dSrgc'rbn afo Consequen+ly, M.(W,)P also sfand disposed of. Parfies are enfif‘ed for said, fhe paH'ien smnds dispcsad of. No.1238/2005 and IA. No.3074/2005 cer'fified copy of *his order. i" sw- f L.C.Bhadoo Judge