IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2410 of 2009 Date of decision:-25.5.2011 Gurparkash Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge in this revision petition is to the order dated 14.3.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (A), Patiala whereby accused Raj Kumar has been convicted under Sections 326,452 and 506 IPC and all the other co- accused have been acquitted. As per version of wife of the complainant namely Ravinder Kaur, it was accused Raj Kumar who had caused injuries to the complainant and as per opinion of doctor (Ex.PW4/C) it was not mentioned that these injuries were dangerous to life. Even in the MLR the doctor had never stated that injuries were dangerous to life and there was no blood vomiting and blood was not coming from the nose of the complainant. As per evidence of PW5 Dr. Aarti there was no bruise, swelling on the cheek and did not mention that any tooth was missing. In view of the above, no ground to interfere is made out in the order dated 14.3.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (A), Patiala. The criminal revision is dismissed. May 25, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE