BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16202 of 2011 ANNAMALAI NADAR ... PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI, PALAYAMKOTTAI , TIRUNELVELI-2 CR.NO. 33/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENTHUR PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b), 465, 467, 468, 471 and 420 I.P.C. in Crime No.33 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A1 and he has been implicated on the allegation that the petitioner having settled the property in favour of other accused, again said to have executed the sale deed in favour of the de-facto complainant and the incident said to have taken place in the year 1989. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the the petitioner has been arrayed as A1 and he has been implicated on the allegation that the petitioner having settled the property in favour of other accused, again said to have executed the sale deed in favour of the de-facto complainant. It is submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. The fact remains that the alleged incident said to have taken place as early as in the year 1898 and further the entire allegations are borne out by records and documents. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter, he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TENKASI 2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE DCB, TIRUNELVELI , PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI-2 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. P.SENTHUR PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.44437 ssk/21.12.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16202 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/