IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA COM PET No.12 of 1999 SANTOSH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA Versus M/S MELMOPLAST PVT.LTD.& ORS ----------- 6. 6.8.2010 This company petition was earlier admitted on 17.9.1999 and notices were directed to be issued to the opposite parties. Since the opposite parties were evading service of notice, steps for substituted service were directed to be taken by advertising it in two newspapers, namely, “Aaj” and “Indian Nation” by order dated 30.3.2001. It appears that no steps were taken by the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that he had no instruction in the matter on 17.1.2002. In the above circumstances, it appears that neither the petitioner nor anyone else is interested in pursuing the present company petition and it is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )