IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8801 of 2010 1. BIMLA DEVI 2. MINA DEVI 3. SHABIYA KUMARI 4. YODHI YADAV 5. PRAMOD YADAV 6. RAJO YADAV @ RAJINDAR YADAV 7. BALCHAND YADAV ---- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02. 12.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are seven in numbers, have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act on the strength of complaint lodged by the complainant. The allegation appears to be general in nature. This Court further finds from the impugned order that earlier to this husband of Sunita Devi, namely, Chhotu Yadav, had filed a compliant case against the present complainant. Cognizance appears to have already been taken. Prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail was not entertained, and in fact, rejected considering the submission that summons have been issued. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Lakhisarai, in connection with Complaint case No. 196( C)/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)