C^ 5^° IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^t( 2-3 / 2009 PETITIONERS ./•'^p\v «!sy'" sy'^y' <€/f ^ 1. LALIT KUMAR DEWATA S/o Shri. Chaturbhuj Dewata Aged about 47 years, Employed as Supportive Teacher, Block Resource Centre, Basana, District: Mahasamund (CG) 2. ROHIT KUMAR PATEL S/o Shri. Krishna Chandra Patel Aged about 46 years, Employed as Supportive Teacher, Block Resource Centre, Basana, District: Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through: The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, RAIPUR-492001 fCG) The Mission Sanchalak, Rajeev Gaadhi Shiksha Mission, (State Prqject Office) RAIPUR-492001 CCG') The DistrictProjectCoordmator, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District Project Office situated in Jila Panchayat, MAHASAMUND District: Mahasamund (CG) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ; 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS :- Same as given in the Cause Title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS :- Same as given in the Cause Title. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH : BiLASPUR WR!TPtJiTiON (S) N0.4315 OF 2GOS PETiTiONER Smt. j.tender Lamba Versus Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others And RESPONDENTS W.P.iSi Nos.5381, 5448. 5450. 54S1, 5483, 5484.5485,5584.575S.5785. 57S3,5805, SS13, 581S, 5819, 5820,582S,5S3S, 5889, 5890, 5891,8018, 6094,6204,6339,S340, S423, S438,5290,5518, 5533, 5578, 5S11, 5S61, 5S91,5811,5317, 5927, 5930, S521 & S822 of 2S09. (Writ Petitions under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pf&sent:- Shri H.B. Agrawai, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meera Jaisv/al, Shri P.P. Sahu, Shri Maieen Siddiqui, Shri P.R. Paankar, Shri Manoj Paranjape, Shri Uttam Pandey, Shrs C.J.K. Rao, Shri Roop Naik, Shri A.S. Rajput, Shri K.S. Pawar, Shri Ajsy Shrivastava, Shri R.R. Soni, Shri V.K. Pandey and Shri Ashwani Shukia, Advocates for the respective petitloners. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate Generai for the State of Chhattssgarh and its authorities. ORD5R (ORAL'. (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2009) 1. With the consent of iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the peutions are heard finaisy. 2. in this batch of matters it has been brought tc the notice of the Court that the transfer orders have been passed witftout compiying with the policy and In some cases the orders having been executed aiso require reconsideration. 3; Shri Thakur, iearned Dy. Advocate Genera! appearing for the State, on instructions, very fairiy submits that all the cases of the petitioners pending consideration before this Court shaii be considered afresh, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the oarties concerned, to examine asto whether the transter liUKJi Qowri orders have been passed in accordance with the poliey and tiii that time the petitioners herein shali not be disturbed. !n view of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners nothing survives in these petitions for adjudicaticn. Accordingiy, u'-.e petitions being W.P. (S) Piios.4315, 5S81, 5448, 545S,5451, 5483,5484,5485, 5584, 575S, 5785,57S3,5805, 5813, SS15,5819, 5320, 5825,5833, 5889, 5890, 5891, 501S, SOS4, S2C4, S33S, 6340, S423, 5438, 5290, 5513, 5533, 5S78, 5S11, 5SS1, 5691, 5811, 5817, 5927, 5930, 5S21 & SS22 of 2008 are disposed of. However, on ths basis of submission made by the learned Dy. Advocate Gensrai, it is made ciear that the peationers hersin shaii continue on iheir respective places of posting. as obtalns today, tiii disposai of their respective cases, 'm accordance with Saw and on its own merits. No order asto costs. Sd/- ^atishK.Agnihotri Judge