IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8452 OF 2005 Khimji @ K.M. Parmar .... Petitioner Vs. Dr. Mangalsingh Dagdusingh Rajput & Ors. .... Respondents Ms Gauri Godse for the Petitioner. Shri P.S. Dani for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: DECEMBER 15, 2006 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. Both the Courts below on detail analysis of the evidence on record have arrived at the concurrent finding on the issue of sub-letting of the premises and the premises being in exclusive possession of the respondent No.3 on account of sub-letting. The said finding being clearly borne out from the records and the same cannot be said to be perverse nor requires any interference in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the impugned orders do not suffer from jurisdictional error and therefore the petition fails and is dismissed. (R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/1215wp8452.5 sjs/1215wp8452.5 sjs/1215wp8452.5