2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 145 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6546 OF 2005 (Shri Harhar Mahadeo Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Watephal V/s. State of Maharashtra and anr.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 02.09.2009 1. Heard Adv. Shri A.S. More for the contempt petitioner. He drew my attention to order passed on 22.12.2005 in Writ Petition No. 6546 of 2005. The Court has given following directions in para 2 of the said order. “2. The learned counsel for the University has categorically stated that the University would take an appropriate decision in conformity with the communication dated 21st October, 2005, and submit the proposals to the State Government, with its remarks / recommendations within the permitted time frame. In view of this statement, 2 nothing survives in the petition. The same is disposed of. C.C. expedited.” 2. The statement is made by the University that it would forward the proposal to the State Government with its recommendation/remarks and it appears from the document produced with Exh. “C” that the proposal was sent to the Government. In view of this the University has complied with the undertaking or statement made before before the Court. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is any breach of order of the Court. No directions were given to the Government. 3. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/SEP09/cp145.08