IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30166 of 2009 SONU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.09.2009 Learned counsel is permitted to correct the typographical error of the date in paragraph 9 of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2008 in a Police case under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 of the Arms Act. The submission is of false implication. When he was sleeping at home, he was taken into custody of the alleged recovery made from under his pillow. Let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajendra Das, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jamui in Jamui P.S. Case No. 274 of 2008. Considering that the witnesses are primarily official and the petitioner has antecedents of three cases, let the trial itself be concluded within six months for which purpose the court below shall be at liberty to appropriately deal with the petitioner, if necessary, notwithstanding the present order. If circumstances so warrants, summons/warrants to the official witnesses shall be served through the Director General of Police, Bihar, who shall remain answerable for the appearance of the official witnesses. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)