IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11225 of 2008 Decided on: 21.12.2010 Sanjeev Kumar and another …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr.Y.W. Chauhan, Advocate vice counsel. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Y.W.Chauhan, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 21, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No