w •••^. ./' ^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ieri$ W.P.NO. s/€3^~12006 ^ PETITIONER --.,^.i Dr. Tahir Hussain Jafari S/o S. Dilshad Ali, Aged about / ....-•^ ^ ^ 60 years, Principal in Govt. ^ ^..^ "<^ ^>v ^•ffS^ '"v^" ^-••::' ^y ^ Girts CoKege Durg, District Durg, R/o. Durg, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Dr. N.P. Dixit Professor, Govt. Science College Durg, District Durg (C.G.). \^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT RESPONDENTS: 1 -^^s^^ l,^em^. ''^' ^ ff^^\ . ^-^ fc^to^'ftl ?4^ (-.;:.}' II ~"^^ %„'°^ ff^.' ^B°^ *^:,9,&a XI-HC-78 v^-OTi^-qiqirt^i, 'Ey^Fis, fcic^i^-iy^ ^IH^I ^TT^ .W"A."^.tts..^.J.l<'.^4^.f^^^Q 3TT^9T q^P (^^TS) ^^TcpTf^TT^ ^H3TT^$T^1Fn^ 'v-.. /..\ ,,-r v "'- ^T^t^R ^Tf^T OT^^T prmci^al 24.10.2005 Shri Sudhir Verma, c< Shri Paakaj Shriva advance copy. Heard. The petitioner, who i$ presentiy wbrkuig as District Durg, has filed fhis proBiotion ao-d transfer ord( By tih.is order, ttie p post of pnncipal of gradiia college aad sent from Du: petitioner submits that caiicer. He is undergouig Hospital, BhUai Nagar, B^ would uot available to tlie ^ Leanied counsel for tliis petition niay be dis| opportuiiity to file a detail<| aufhority aiid concemed a| the representation witbin Court aiid io. ttiat period ttij stayed. CPI<<f<l)<nv1 ^!+tC^T^'I^L<3 ^fvi^j^ ^3lf^T3Ilt9T |>unsel for tiie petitioner. ^tava, Paiiel La\^yer for the State ou tbe shown to be aged about 60 years aad ia Goven^ment Girls Coy.ege, Durg, |writ petitiou chaUengiiig the vaMdity of |:r dated 14.10.2005 (Annexure-P/ 1). ^titioner has been promoted from the |:e coUege to principal of post graduate :g to Korba, Leanied couusel for th.e petitioner is suffering froin boue [regular treatiaent frpm. B.S,R, Caiicer •lliilai. He subniits that these facilities fe'titioner if he wlll be sent to Korba, petitioner prays that for the present, s|posed of and he may be given an ?d representation before the coiiceme.d juthority may be directed to dispose of |the stipulated period granted by tiiis ^ traiisfer order of the petitioner may be tftie r XI-HC-78 \j-oc| r<4M\0<<, V>X\\^ifK?, Rlrtro^ ^,^^.^.-^.^.'..^.o.^^ioo 3rT^5Tq5R?(^crf^6n5) ^^T<y»Tf^rt<^ ^PH3H^$T^WP -r ^in ^^ .^ ^' y ^ V '^ ?';i:mwr^rf^T3n^$T ^^ 1 the prayer for graQ.t of stay particularly consideriiig th. cpi<lfc$<n<1 ^!^toT^'fet<l ^^•C!1< ^ai^rsn^T This liaiited prayer ijaade for filuig bf representation is not opposed by fh.e State coiiri^el. However, fhe State counsel opposes ui th.at period. Considermg the fact{s and cu'cumstances of the case • aiid p circumstance th.at tlie petitioner is a patient of bone caacer, I ao|i iiicltned to dispose of this writ petition with. Uberty ui favour offlie|petitioiier that if so advised, he Biay file a detailed representation al|ong with the certified copy of this order aiid copy of tfae writ petttion aad other docum.ents about his medical toreatiiient, before Ijlie concenied authority withiii a period of 15 days frora today aii^l if such a representation is filed, ihe coucemed authority shatl c| preferably within a fnrther re.sult of tlie representat petitioner. In tlie meaiitime, it j has not been relieved till period fhe represeutation f its efficacy after period of 2 Certified copy be deU^ered by toBiorrow. ispose offhe saaie as early as possible ^eriod of6 weeks/after 15 days aiid the ion shall be coiii33iunicated to tlie hereby directed fhat if the petitioner today i.e. 24.10.2005, he shall not be reUeved for a further perio^ of 2 niontlis from today during which iled by the petitioner shaU be disposed of. This order regarduig. st^y of traasfer shall automatically loose m.ontih.s from today. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge