-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3868 OF 2008 Shri Shihaji Kisan Khilare : Applicant (Petitioner) V/s. Shri Bhairvanath Shikshan Sansha & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.S.V.Pitre for the applicant. Mr.A.M.Joshi for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.A.P.Vanarse, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for resp. nos.3 & 4. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2009. P.C. Heard. 2. Mr.Pitre, the learned counsel for the applicant, submitted that there is no dispute that throughout the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal, there was an injunction, as a result of which the applicant was in the employment of the School. Mr.Joshi, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2, however, points out that by the impugned order, the Tribunal has rendered a clear and -: 2 :- categorical finding that the applicant has resigned from the services and that resignation was not forced upon him. In fact, Mr.Joshi points out that the Tribunal has recorded the respondents’ submission that it was the applicant’s own contention that there was instances of his misbehaviour with girl students and there was talk about the same in the village where the School is situate. The applicant submitted his resignation voluntarily in that background. It is true that the Tribunal has not rendered a particular finding about the applicant’s conduct, but there is no doubt that the Tribunal has come to a clear finding that the applicant’s resignation was voluntary and not forced. 3. In this view of the matter, there is no merit in the prayer that there should be an interim injunction as granted during the pendency of the appeal before the School Tribunal. Therefore, the prayer for interim relief is rejected. 4. Civil Application stands disposed of. S.A. BOBDE, J.