WP(C) 1516/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. E. Ahmed, learned counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. B.J. Ghosh, lea rned Govt. Advocate, for the respondents. The petitioner’s basic grievance is that he has been working as Muster Roll Work er since 01.01.91 and services of persons, similarly situated as the petitioner, have been regularized, but the petitioner has been denied the same benefit. A query was raised by this Court as to who are those persons, whose services hav e been regularized. In this regard, it needs to be noted that the affidavit, whe reby the petitioner has supported this writ petition, avers that it is true to t he knowledge of the petitioner that services of persons, similarly situated, hav e been regularized. It is, now, submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that the petitioner has alre ady made an application, under the Right to Information Act, 2005, to furnish th e names of those persons, who have been regularized. This shows that the petitio ner does not know, as on today, as to who were the persons, whose services have been regularized. In such circumstances, the very ground on which the entire wri t petition was founded, collapses. Situated thus, this writ petition, as sought for on behalf of the petitioner, is hereby disposed of on being withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised. No costs.