IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( MAIN ) NO. 345 OF 2009 STATE, THROUGH THE POLICE INSPECTOR, WOMEN POLICE STATION ... Applicant Versus MR. MOHAMMAD GAUS KHAN ... Respondent Mr. C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for the Applicant/State. Coram:- R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:- 19th January, 2010 P.C. This is an application filed by the State invoking Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code for cancellation of bail of the Respondent which was granted by the learned President of the Children's Court by Order dated 01.07.2009. The Respondent is an accused in Crime no.3/2006 registered at the Women's Police Station, Panaji, for offences punishable under Sections 342, 366-A, 293, 376, 511 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C., Sections 4, 5 and 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 and Sections 2(y)(II), 8, 9 of the Goa Children's Act, 2003. 2. The Respondent-accused filed an application for bail which came to be granted by the said Order dated 01.07.2009. The learned Sessions Judge has taken into consideration the fact that in the first statement of the victim girl, there was nothing incriminating stated against the accused. It was only on the basis of the supplementary statement that the accused was arrested on 24.06.2009 as also the fact that the exact dates of the commission of the acts alleged against the accused were not disclosed, no medical examination of the girl was conducted and also the fact that the victim girl has already married and delivered a child. The learned President of the Children's Court has also taken into consideration the fact that the Respondent is having permanent residence in Goa and he is doing business there and, therefore, there is no apprehension or likelihood that he would not be available for further investigations. 3. In my view, no fault could be found with the reasons mentioned by the learned President in granting bail. It is not the case of the State that the Respondent has misused the bail granted to him. In that view of the matter, no case for cancellation of the bail is made out. 4. The application is accordingly rejected. R. M. SAVANT, J. arp/*