1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4039 OF 2010 Bhagwam Kondiba Bangar .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Shrimant Mundhe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 19TH JULY, 2010. PER COURT : . The limited relief which the petitioner has sought for in this petition is to direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider and decide the application submitted by the petitioner for correction of the record of rights of the petitioner. The respondents in their affidavit in reply particularly at paragraph 6 have stated that U/Sec. 32 (1) of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act 1947, the respondent No. 3 has passed an order on 10.06.2010 for paper 2 publication and the application of the petitioner would be finalized expeditiously. 2. Shri Tambe, learned Assistant Government Pleader states on instructions that the pending application of the petitioner would be delt with and decided in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today. We accept the aforesaid statement as an undertaking to the Court. 3. On the basis of said statement, learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, seeks to withdraw this writ petition as the relief stand substantially granted to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn on accepting the statement made in the affidavit as well as the oral statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/July 10