IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 129 of 2010. Decided on: August 24, 2010. Budhi Singh Thakur …..Petitioner. Versus Ms. Nandita Gupta & anr. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Ashwani Pathak, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG, for respondent No.1. Mr. K.B.Khajuria, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner complains that the respondents have violated the directions in the judgment delivered in CWP No. 606 of 2010. The issue pertains to the transport contract materials to and from the Cement Factory of J.P. The petitioner claimed that he was entitled to the benefit of Annexures P-3 and P-5 (in the Writ Petition), orders until the Registrar takes appropriate action in terms of the judgment. The stand taken by the first respondent in the judgment is that Annexures P-3 & P-5, orders have been strictly enforced and no direction, whatsoever has been issued to the second respondent for issuing passes as annexed as Annexure P-2. The second respondent is not a party to the Writ Petition. Be that as it may. Since the first respondent has a duty to strictly comply with the judgment, there will be direction to the first respondent to personally intervene in the matter and see that the directions issued by this Court to follow the arrangement as per P-3 and P-5, until the Registrar, Co-operative 2 Societies, takes a fresh decision, are complied with. For any lapse, it is made clear that the first respondent shall be personally liable. Accordingly, the COPC is closed. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 24, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (karan) Judge.