IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3552 of 2010 UDESHWAR KAMTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3. 18.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Opposite parties. It is submitted that in pursuance of the fresh inquiry done the petitioner has been exonerated and therefore is entitled to be reinstated with all consequential benefits. There being no such order in the writ petition, which only directed a fresh enquiry to be held in accordance with law during which the petitioner shall remain under suspension, but shall not be reinstated and that has been complied with in the fresh enquiry report. The remedy for the petitioner, if any, and if so advised, lies in a fresh writ petition only. The objections of the Opposite parties that the petitioner has not been exonerated are matters to be examined in a fresh writ petition only. The MJC application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)