BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of July Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.8960 of 2011 KUTTY @ CHITAMBARAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.556/2010, THANJAVUR, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S. RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 388 and 506(i) of I.P.C. in Crime No.556 of 2010, on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner/Accused No.3 has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.556 of 2010 under Sections 302, 201, 388 and 506(i) of I.P.C. He further submitted that the specific overt act against the petitioner is that he demanded money from the defacto complainant for not disclosing the commission of offence to others and hence, he has come forward with this application for anticipatory bail. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A3 and investigation is over and charge sheet has been filed and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 5. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, this court could find that Charge sheet has been filed which has not been taken on file and the petitioner is history sheeted rowdy. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Considering the fact that the case has been registered under Sections 302, 201, 388 and 506(i) of I.P.C. I am inclined to direct the petitioner to surrender himself before the District and Sessions Court and to file an application for bail and in the event of filing such an application, the learned District Judge concerned is directed to consider the bail application as expeditiouly as possible. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- 26/07/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, THANJAVUR 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S. RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.24779 ssk/29.07.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8960 of 2011 Date :26/07/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/