IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (C) NOMQ$£ OF 201 1 PETITIONER / Sunil Lakda S/o Shri Jai Masih Lakda, aged about 48 years, Occupation Advocate, practicing in the District & Sessions Court Ambikapur, Chamber No. 7, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS /1. State of C.G. through the Secretary Tribal Development Department DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. Chhattisgarh Antyavasayee Sahkari Vikas Nigam Ltd. A Government of C.G; undertaking through its Managing Director, B—9, Sector 5, devendra Nagar Raipur C.G. The District and Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. The Collector Surguja (Ambikapur), District Surguja C.G. 5. The Chief Executive Officer, District Antyavasayee Sahkari Vikas Nigam Ltd. Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G’. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUSICERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. V " / ‘IMAY THIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, x f3 V Present: b) HTGH CO{ FRT OF CHEATTISGARH AT IEHLASW ER W ,. N) WRIT PETXTYGN (CA Na. 4722 nf‘Qm 1 .PETE _ I ‘ NLR : Sum} Labia. R F SFONDENTS : State of CG, 8c Othgrs‘ VRR SI IS SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnilmtri, J. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TEE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shri Rakesh Pandey. Advoczite for the petitioner. Shii Afar; Sac}, Gavmmieni Ad‘mcaie fer the State/reap ‘iiatmi N0; 1 and 4, ORDER ORAL {Passed on 10 (lay of Octcber, 2G1 1) Challenge in thm peti‘iion is to the arder dated 11:082011 (Annemre Pll) gassed by the regpondent No, 5, whereby ihe pefitioner has been directed to stop the eemmercial activiiies camed on bv the petitioner in room No, ’7 a1: the District 8; Sessions Court campus: Ambikapur, ailotted to him and further, to remove the temporary shed consmleted or: a, plot of land within the same campus. Shri Sac, learned eounsel apoearing for the State submits that the petitiooez; who is an A‘dvoeate, was in the possession of the above premises for earryiog out. his professional work but the petitioner has installed ohoto-copier machine. computer system and is performing co‘rmnereiai activities which is against. the terms and conditions of the aliotment order dated 02,08,2010 (Amexure R/il t Learned eounsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the premises in dispute was. allotted to the oetitioner for his £0 professional work, howsverg during rainy saasog a tampm'aiy shed was constmcted with the pauniwion of the Additional Collector: Ambikapur. Now? the rainy ssason is overg th‘m, the temporary shed is not required and the same would be removed by the petitioner within a. period of seven. days, Shri l’andey further submits that. the photo-copier machine inetalled, as alleged by the respondent authorities: would also be removed withm a. pexiod of seven days. In View of the above: nothing survives for adjudication in this netition. The allotment of the room No. 7 to the yetitionert as aforesta1e¢ shall eontinue, however? on verification, if the State/resnondents find that the needful as aforestated by teamed counsel for the petitioner is not done and the terms and eonditions the allotment of the above premises are not followedl the authorities shall be at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation and direction the writ petition is /' . disnosed of. Sd/- ; f Salish K.Agnihau~i ‘ Judge Amit