'"% y ^. ii ^h ^ XI-HC—78 'ysf ^l^ld^, ^•H<t<o, fs|<ni^lj,< L<^cs3 ^^39 *11*1CTI «»*1ieC» "^ 200 ^ 3TT^?T TR^F ((1GI^<S<<^) gTT^T^T RTlJch TT^ STT^T sb^lJch Respondents 1. '^nw^f^Tsn^T •etitioaer Versus Moti Lal Sharma, A{ Qrade-I (Eilstwhile Transport Sarju Bagi4 and Distt. Q <^l^fd<fly1 "RT^f ^* 'fe^ iF^I^K ^73tf^H 377^11 ^harma S/o Late Shri Sukh Ram ^ed about 59 years^ Retired Driver Madhya F>radesh State Road (porporationj, Posted at Bilaspur, R/o |ha, Azad Nagar, Masan Ganj, Tahsil }ilaspur (CG) State ofCh|iattisgarh, Through JThe Secretary, Department of Ti'ciiisporlat|iuii, Maiitralaya, DKS BIiawaii, Raipur (CG) Managi(ng The Adhosarachbia (Parivahan Director, Vikas Nigam frabhag), Raipur (CG) The Assist^ Lekha AniJ Nidhi (Regi^ Indira Gan<j (CG) The Divisioilial AdhosaracN (Pai'ivaliaii The Divisioijial Adhosaraclil Bilaspur, T^ The Region^l Kannacharl Coiiiplex, Raipur (CG]| Chhattisgarh |it Commissioner, bhag No.4, Kannachari Bhavishya t>nal Office), Block-D, Scheme No.32, |hi Vyavasahik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur Manager, na Vikas Nigam Chhattisgarh :>rabliag), Raipur (CG) Accounts officer, na Vikas Nigam . Chhattisgarh, llisil 8s Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Comi-nissioner, Bhavishya Nidhi, Nav Bharat Rajbaiidlia NIaidaii, Raipur, Disll. t- .',yy^-. '^ if JA •...,, ^^.,/XL-HG—JS -^E£7ST-?' HWW <»»*(ra» '3'sf '^t<41d<ll, 8>tii^4l<o, [®l<ni'!H14,< ^;..A?^..»S^ •^200 3TI^?T TRRT ( y<?^<st^) 3^T^T ^T f^'lJcb ^T^ff 3^?T $^^ich Khan ^^TW^feTSTI^T ^4 S.B. Hoii?ble Shri Dhireadra MishaA, J 19.9.2008 Shri Deepak Jain, counsel for|the Shri MPS Bhatia, Dy. Govt. A(j The instant petition is direct< not deciding the pension case of the| of his retirement since the petition| from Chhattisgarh State Infrasti-nctural <the Corporation^ w.e.f.31stJanu4y? foi-warded the case of the petitione| (Annexure P/2) and again sent a letj respondent No.3. Learned counsel for the peti^ disposed of with liberty to the petij before the Regional Commissioner| raising his gi'ievances raised in thi^ coricerned authorities in accordance) with Leained counsel for the State In view of above, the instantj petitioner to make a detailed repi^e within a period of two weeks from this petition, who, in turn, shall within a period of three mont^s representation, in accordance with 1| ^pri^Fft^ 'RT^if ^f 'fexst ipyi^K ^3TRfH3T^T petitioner. |v. for the State. |d against inaction of the respondents in [petitioner even after more than five years sr has already retired from his services Development Corporation (in short r, 2003. The Corporation has already for fbdng of his pension on 28.5.2003 Ler dated 24.5.2005 in this connection to ioner submits that this petition may be ;ioner to make a detailed representation KaiTnachari Bhavishya Nidhi, Raipur, petition, which may be decided by the law. has no objection to the above prayer. Ipetition is disposed of with liberty to the tesentation before the respondent No.6, |oday, raising all his grievaiices raised in (^ecide the saine expeditiously, preferably froni the date of receipt of such ^w. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 4-