IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2 OF 2005 IN PETITION NO. 65 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : Prothonotaries orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Ms.M.Munim i/b. Rajesh Kothari & Co. for the plaintiffs. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 28th January 2008. DATED: 28th January 2008. DATED: 28th January 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The learned counsel for the plaintiffs has filed purshis seeking discharge. Discharge cannot be granted on the basis of purshis. For that purpose motion would have to be taken out preceded with notice to the plaintiffs. 2. However, since learned counsel for the plaintiffs makes a statement that she has no instruction to proceed with the suit, suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)