IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.752 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR, SON OF TALKESHWAR RAJAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJA BIGHA, P.S. + P.O. RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. ……………………………………….............PETITIONER/APPELLANT. Versus 1. THE GENERALMANAGER (PERSONNEL),PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, HEAD OFFICE, BHIKHAJCUM PLACE, NEW DELHI. 2. THE ZONAL MANAGER, BIHAR ZONE, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, NEAR R. BLOCK, PATNA. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, MAGADH RANGE, A.P. COLONY, 110-370, DISTRICT-GAYA. 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, BRANCH OFFICE, RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. ……………………………………RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT. ----------- For the Appellant : Mr. Bhuneshwar Prasad, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Prasant Vedesen, Advocate. ---------- 3. 6.1.2010. The appellant being dissatisfied with the order dated 8.8.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.6334 of 2006 has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal. We have heard Mr. Bhuneshwar Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Prashant Vedesen, learned counsel for the respondents-Bank. On a perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge, it is clear that the learned Single Judge has 2 accepted the plea of the Bank that the appellant was merely engaged for the period that he had claimed. That apart, there is no scheme for regularization and, therefore, no right accrues in favour of the appellant. In view of the aforesaid, we do not see any merit in this appeal. Hence, it is dismissed without any order as to costs. P.S. (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)