IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2843 of 2006 ANIL KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 21.7.2009 No one appears for the petitioner. By order dated 18.4.2006, this Court had quashed the orders of the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority, by which the petitioner had been dismissed from service on the ground of violation of the principle of natural justice and permitted the respondents to proceed to conclude the enquiry within a period of six months. The petitioner has filed the present application claiming wilful violation of the above order. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party No.4, Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur, it is stated that the departmental proceeding has already been concluded and the petitioner has been directed to be reinstated in service by the District Order No.362 /2007. It is further submitted that subsistence allowance has been paid to the petitioner after treating his entire period of dismissal as period of suspension. In the above circumstances, no case for initiating contempt proceedings is made out against the opposite parties. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)