THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI Civil Revision Petition No. 5966; 5969 & 5973 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: These civil revision petitions are directed against a common order dated 6th November 2009 made in I.A. Nos. 3129, 3130 and 3131 of 2009 in O.S. No. 302 of 2007 on the file Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Revision petitioner herein is the petitioner/plaintiff and respondent is the respondent/defendant in all the petitions. The revision petitioner filed the above three applications in I.A. Nos. 3129, 3131 and 3130 of 2009 to reopen the case, to receive documents by condoning the delay and to recall P.W 2 for marking the said documents respectively on the ground that the said document was misplaced at the time of filing of the suit and he secured the same till recent to filing of the above petitions. The respondent therein opposed the petitions by filing a counter. The court below after hearing both the counsel and upon considering the material on record dismissed all the petitions. Aggrieved against the same, the present civil revision petitions are filed. Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner respondent. A perusal of the order under revision goes to show that the petitioner wants to produce a document which according to him shows the relationship between the parties, but on the other hand, since the respondent is not disputing the jural relationship of tenant and landlord as between them, the learned judge of the court below dismissed the petitions having opined that the petitioner before him is not entitled for seeking reopen or receiving the document or recall of PW2 as prayed for. The learned judge further observed that when the main suit is posted for arguments after the evidence on both sides was completed, the applicant filed the above applications and that the document sought to be marked is not relevant for the adjudication of the dispute. In view of the cogent reasoning adduced by the learned judge, I do not see any illegality or irregularity in the common order under revision and it needs no interference. Therefore, the present civil revision petitions are dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. ____________ 17-12-2009 Kvrk THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI Civil Revision Petition No. 5966; 5969 & 5973 OF 2009 17th December 2009