1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4643/2007 (Rajpal and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 27/09/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. G.R.Punia for the petitioners. Mr. V.R.Mehta Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers, more particularly the statement of independent witness Jogendra Singh who has narrated the entire story in his statement with regard to the deceased Kavita and her sister Monika and their marriages and conduct during their marital life. From the statements of witnesses available on record, it appears that the deceased Kavita married to Satish and they had been living separately and the present petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law who are residing separately. Almost all the witnesses stated that the deceased and her husband had been residing separately. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and mainly the fact that the allegation is against husband of the deceased Satish, without commenting on the merit of the case, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Rajpal S/o Thakar Ram and 2 Reshma Devi W/o Rajpal be released on bail in FIR No. 216/07 P.S. Sadulshahar, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP