rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3900 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3900 OF 2005 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3900 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT NO.3118 OF 2005 SUIT NO.3118 OF 2005 SUIT NO.3118 OF 2005 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.Jayesh Bhatt for plaintiff. Mr.Girin Pandit for defendant nos.4 and 5. Mr.Swapnil Bangar i/b.ALMT Legal for defendant nos. 6 and 8. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR J. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR J. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR J. DATE : 28th September, 2007. DATE : 28th September, 2007. DATE : 28th September, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The plaintiff seeks protection in respect of the flat over which the court receiver has already been appointed. The court receiver is defendant no.8. In that view of the matter, it is necessary to consider the appointment of the court receiver in this suit at this stage. The rights, if any, of the plaintiffs would be safeguarded by the following order : :: ORDER :: i. The court receiver shall give notice of any application concerning the said flats to the plaintiffs at least 72 hours in advance. Further the defendants shall not make any application in respect of the said flat in suit no. 1957 of 1993 or in any other proceedings without giving plaintiff’s advocate 72 hours notice. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of with liberty to apply.