0§)m)/_\‘ CD BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) @émw Bmw WRIT PETITION [SI NO. —.7?§a OF 2010 1. Kishor Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Muralidhar Gupta, Aged about 45 years, Occupation— Assistant. ”I Teacher, Primary School, Bhengari, 'Tahsil— Gharghora, District Raigarh (C.G.). 2. Keshav Prasad Patel S/o Shri Niranjan Prasad Patel, Aged about 48 years, Occupation- ll PETITIONERS Chintamani Patel S/o Shri Mohar Singh Patel, Aged about 41 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Jhariyapali, Tahsil- Gharghora, District Raigarh (C.G.). 4. Mohan Lal Chauhan S/o Late ,l‘ Shri Baraturam Chauhan, Aged about 41 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Saraipali, Tahsil— Gharghora, District Raigarh (C . G.) . Narayan Prasad 'Rathiya S/o Shri Kunjram Rathiya, Aged about 4O years, Occupation— Assistant School, Bulekera, Tahsil— Gharghora,‘ Teacher, Primary Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Konpara, Tahsil— Gharghora, District Raigarh (C . G .) . Primary School, Bhagora, Tahsil— Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). Khel Kumar Patel S/o Shri Ghasiram Patel, Aged about 42 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Rodopali, Tahsil— Tamnar, District ' Raigarh (C.G.). Subhash Chandra Gupta S/o Late Shri Jaidev Gupta, Aged about 42 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Uttar Regaon, Tahsil— 10. VERSUS RESPONDENTS r District Raigarh (C.G.). Lakhan Kumar Patel S/o Shri Nandlal Patel, Aged about 41 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). Anjan Kumar Chauhan S/o Shri Krishna Lal Chauhan, Aged about 38 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Kesharchuwan, Tahsil- Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.). Ashok Kumar Patel S/o Late Shri Chamar Singh Patel, Aged about 42 years, Occupation— Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Mauhapali, Tahsil- Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.. 1] State of Chhattisgarh, ) Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawall, Department, Raipur (C.G.). 2] Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raigarh, Tahsil 8L District- Raigarh (C.G.). \ 3] Block Education Officer, Block— Tamnar, Tamanar, District— Raigarh (C.G.). 4] Block Education Officer, Block— ‘Gharghora, Gharghora, District- Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMDTANCES OF THE CASE. . a . “\\\ ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \ WRIT PETITION (S) No. 250 of2010 PETITIONERS : Kishore Kumar Gupta & Others. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri S.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER t I (Passed on 20 iE day of January, 2010) By this petition, the petitioners, who are Assistant Teacheis, are aggrieved by the order dated 11.11.2009 wherein the petitioners were granted seniority from the date of their joining in other Division/District. They further pray for quashing of the final gradation list dated 24.07.2009 (Annexure P/l). There is no dispute that the transfer of the petitioners were made on their own request and policy dated 24.6.1976, referred in letter dated 11.11.2009, provides for counting of seniority on the date, the petitioners as Assistant Teachers joined the new Division or District. The State has acted in accordance with the policy of the State - Govemment. Even there is no challenge in this petition to the aforesaid policy decision and as such, its validity cannot be examined. Thus, no interference is required in this matter. 3. Accordingly, the petition being devoid of merit, is dismissed at the motion stage itself. 4. No order asto costs. Sd/- SATISH K. AGNH-IOTRI Judge