WP(C) 1437/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr R. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mrs VL Singh, le arned counsel for state respondents; and Mr AK Goswami, learned senior counsel f or respondent nos.6 to 15. The petitioner by the present writ petition has challenged the communica tion dated 11.1.2010 issued by 10(ten) members of the Murkang Chelek Anchalik Pa nchayat expressing no-confidence against the petitioner as president; the resolu tion dated 18.2.10 adopted in an emergent meeting of the panchayat held under th e chairmanship of the vice-president resolving to forward the proceedings thereo f to the Dhemaji zilla parishad; and the communication dated 20.2.10 issued by e xecutive officer of the anchalik panchayat addressed to Dhemaji zilla parishad i ntimating the latter that initially 10(ten) members had moved the no-confidence- motion, out of which 7(seven) had withdrawn themselves there-from, and again 6(s ix) members wanted to know and discuss about the matter. It is not in dispute that the zilla parishad is yet to decide on the com munication issued by the executive officer of the anchalik panchayat, and the me eting to discuss no confidence motion against the petitioner is also yet to be c onvened. In view of the above, the present writ petition is premature, and hence is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum if any adverse decision is taken against him. No costs.