IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 15558 of 2008 Decided on: 23.08.2010 Bhag Chand …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the intervening development. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge August 23, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?