IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4424 of 2008. Decided on: 14.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Ashok Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondents No.3 and 4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that due to intervening developments, he has instructions from his client not to press this petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 14, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?