I , 0g (0% ® (o H IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wmt PETITION (C) Naéqtw /2o11 IN THE MATTER OF: PETITIONER M/s Indus Smeifers Lfd., A company duly registered under “me Companies Act, T956, having its Registered office at 205, Samia Colony, Main Road, Raipur, Chhaiiisgarh, Through ifs Director, Laiit Kumar Singhania, S/o Late Shri N.L. Singhania, Aged about 57 years, R/o 28, College Road, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh” b" VERSU$ RESPONDENTS i. State of Chhattisgarh, Ministry of Mineral Resources, Through its Secretary, // D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2. The District Collector, District— Kanker, Chhattis‘garh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR CERTIORARI *wr—ta mm , Wrmtrér, {mm : ' ‘ Wy WW: 1 mam war (aairvma) 31m Em 1%}? awn “ma! WW 7% w?” a'erw $E : Hon’bie $hri Manindra Moha é $hrivastava J. 2’! 4 1 ~2a11 Shri Ankit Singhai, counse! fer the peiitioner. e This petition has been f§ied by ihe petmoner aggrieved on acceun’: of inactian an ihe part of i’ne responde ts in decéding grant of prcspeciing Ecense far H’Gn Ore. Learned caunsel for ihe peiner submifs €hait the peiitioner iniendmg 20 ebtain prespecting iicense had su' miféeci an appiicaiion befere the compeiera‘z aaii‘zority 0f ihe State Governmem o 2Q£L§4f03 in prescribed preforma eiceg with yequis§€e fee. When no decisim w éaken on fee appiication, an appiicaiion was made for éecision sf the app§icati n feiioweé Jay varioue reminders. Learned ceuneei fw €he peiiiioner sebmiis 2' ai a meme was issued is ihe eetitieeey on 24f’i2i0g {Annexare FE} fixing ihe d ite cf heaé'ing 0n “12im‘f1: 0‘ ii is eteéed the? the peéii’joeer 1 company submified its repiy l informeeon with reieveni enciesufes ekmg with. ie‘t‘ter datevj 12i01f13 b i even ihereafter, the mai‘ier has remeh‘aed ,eending and ne decisica has been ’ ken‘ He suhmiis the? ihe reepeedee‘zs may be direcied i0 take a decision in f’ne . ai‘aer as his appiice’zicn came? be aiiowed ta remain pending witheui any decision nde§niieiy. On ‘ihe etieer hand} ieamed $tei’e ceuneei eubmiis that the peiiiien i piemaiure esno deeisien on petiiion ris iepresentetien has been taken. Taking into censideraiion the ubm ssion made by ieamed colmsei fer the pariies, for ii'ne present, 'nierest of ju tice wouid be served if e directiem is issuee‘ i0 tee respenderiis 2c take decision en eiii'ioner‘e appiice’cierz fer grarri oi preepeciing X Ms. $umia Jain, Panei Lawy for the Staie 0n advance copy. i iicei‘iSe. I r ....I_.‘ mam yew gamma, weenie—Fen 4o—-2 /2cn i—i ,soma éto a . 7 “ha «MW vr'mm {mm Def CD 1w £4119 QigmT§3W awe?W (Yqf-vmsx) mmfidr‘g ”m mW mx3‘‘1 .m ~ m r Q V ' ismmhwéf§%@mx r éa x??? 311%?! m ,I \mv,‘ Accom‘mgw, the respcndents are directeci to d‘eside geti‘tioner‘s app§§cation for gyanf 9f ,érospectirag iicen$e, siaéckiy in $Ccomiance with Eaw, §§hin a period of w- ihree months fram the date sf receim o§ cspy cf ms omier. We peswor: is §ina§iy eiisposed bff. at xs made mew tha‘r tms oun has mt expressa-i any opinion ora me merits ané ciaém fer gyant of pmspeatmg iéce nse. \ Sd/- v - Mamndra Mohan Shrlvastava Judge Deepii ‘