IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22845 of 2008 DASO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. no.25847 of 2008 Pankaj Yadav Versus The State of Bihar ------------------ 4. 7.8.2008 Heard. The case relates to an incident of dacoity committed by the petitioners and others in which a boat loaded with bags of maize was taken away by the accused persons. Recovery of the boat or maize was made from the persons other than the petitioners, namely, Akhil Yadav and Rajendra Yadav, who were named in the F.I.R. The contention is that the petitioners have been named merely because the informant heard their names being called by companion accused persons as was the case with other accused persons also. It was contended that it could not be the perfect identification and the two petitioners ought to have been put on T.I.P. Learned A.P.P. has taken me through some more paragraphs of the case diary in which the witnesses examined have clearly stated that they have identified the accused persons while they were committing the offence, considering which the two petitions are dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha, J )