THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4291 OF 2006 ORDER:- Heard Mr.M.M. Hussain, learned counsel for petitioner and though served none appeared for the respondent. The only grievance of the petitioner in this case is that even though earlier an application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act is filed to send the document for comparison and amount has been deposited as directed, however, the same has come back mainly on the ground that signatures for the relevant period are not available and yet the Court below without giving opportunity passed the order closed the application, which is not correct. Having heard the counsel for petitioner and on perusal of the records, it is seen that since the petitioner was apparently not heard on the aforesaid objection, it is felt that opportunity should be given for reconsideration. Accordingly, the revision is allowed and I A No.1314 of 2005 is reopened. The Court below is directed to consider the application afresh and dispose of the same in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the parties. No Costs. _______________ B PRAKASH RAO,J DATE: 17.6.2010 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4291 OF 2006 Date: 17.6.2010