..'"*^~ ./^e-^€^ ^ Sinila Benck BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.C.C.No43"7/2011- AopIicant/Appellant:- g^msurat S/o Ramcharan Teli aged about 62 years R/o at villiage Jamdeie Tahsil Surajpur District Sarguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS :- 1 Shivmangal Goand S/o Sukhram ,aged about 47 years; ^"1. Agarsai S/o SuKhram Goand ,aged about 49 years; R^ V ^A^ ^s^--^:v '^e^--<^.' o f' i.Suphal S/o Gariba Chamar ,aged about 42 years ; ^4. Pradhan S/o Baiga aged about 57 years; ^.5. Sukhlal S/o Kanwal Sai aged about 42 years; fi-'fi. Shivlal S/o Rengu aged about 42 years ; All above Respondents R/o at Villiage Jamdeie Tahsil Surajpur District Sarguja (C.G.) . -7. State ofChhattisgarh ,Through Collector Sarguja (C.G.). ^ Application seekins <'the 'Testoration of Second \\ • ~^~ appeal.NjB;94/2011,dismissed for Non prosecution vide order dtd. ~»^ 18/03/2011 .passed by this Hon'ble Court •T5g-^fpii?ra,'g^twre. ^iray 3TT^T •VfSR wqciT g>w<h (1(. 'TFI. 200 Iq^g' •sW^T^T h-n'h sv^i sti^i<=t) •yt^t S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Sahu SII^ITRIIWBfet 29.04.2011 . Shri Siiresh Pandey, Advoc: Ms. SangeetaMishra, Pane re^toration Heard on application for Leamed counsel appearinj that the counsel for the app^llant account of bona&de mistake, th^ was dismissed on 18.03.2011, n( file. On due consideration, I am| applicant has succeeded in e^ absence, therefore, the applicat 94/11 is restored to its original A copy of this order be pla|i file and fhe same be listed for h^ til'iln'il'i 'WRff 4 'fec?t <r'=it$i< ^; aipatf an^i ite for the applicant. Lawyer tbr the State. ofSANo.94/11. ^ for the appllcant submits could not appear on :refore, SA No. 94/11, which iay be restored to its original satisfled that the coiuisel for (plaining the cause of his lon is allowed and 8A No. flle. ced on record of the original aring after srnnmer vacation, Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge •^g [TN!?RTa