IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 34129 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAHAJAN, S/O. PRABHAKARAN, MEYYARAPPALLIL, POOTHIKADU P.O., POOMALA, SULTHAN BATHERY. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUKUMARAN SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SULTHAN BATHERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 2. SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, SULTHAN BATHERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, WAYANAD DISTRICT ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT: 3. AHEMMED KUTTY, CHELAKKAL HOUSE, POST BATHERY, WAYANAD. (R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A.NO.33/99) ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON FOR R1 SRI.K.M.SATHIANATHA MENON FOR RESPONDENTS SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL FOR ADDL.R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.34129 of 2007 ================== Dated this the 18th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed this writ petition complaining that the directions in Ext.P5 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions have not been complied with the Panchayat. In that order the earlier decision of the Panchayat was set aside and, the Panchayat was directed to give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner herein on the complaint filed against him and to take fresh proper action if any, on the complaint. The learned counsel for the Panchayat submits that a decision has been taken to renew the licence of the petitioner. This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge