IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Misc.Petition No.M-35619 of 2009 Date of Decision: 16.12.2009 Banta Singh. ....... Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others. ....... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Shri S.K.Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. praying for issuance of a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to investigate the case and to take action as per law and to register an F.I.R. against respondent no.3. The petitioner has contended that he was selling crops to respondent no.3, who was a Commission Agent; that the said respondent has filed a civil suit on the basis of a pronote and receipt dated 21.5.2006 for reovery of an amount of Rs.6,21,500/-; that the suit is frivolous and is based on a fake and forged document and that respondent nos. 1 and 2 be directed to initiate proceedings against the said respondent after registering an F.I.R. Crl.Misc.Petition No.M-35619 of 2009 -2- .... I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the material on record. The petitioner is alleging that the pronote has been fabricated. He has filed the instant petition in the year 2009, whereas the suit its was initiated in the year 2006. Prima facie, it is obvious that the petitioner has come up with this plea as an after-thought. In view of this fact and also in view of the observations of the Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu Versus State of U.P. And others, 2008(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 392 (S.C.), the instant petition is without any merit and is, therefore, dismissed. All pending miscellaneous applications are also dismissed in view of the above. December 16,2009 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge