IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA. Cr.MMO No. 254 of 2011 Date of decision: 28.12.2011. _______________________________________________________ Ms. Sunita Anand, W/o Mr. Sunil Anand, R/o D-60, Defence Colony, New Delhi. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through the Secretary (Home). 2. Ms. Urvashi Dogra D/o Late Col SC Dogra (a) r/o Torrentium Sartaj Mannor, Bruckhurst,Shimla (HP) Also- (b) R/o 481, Sector 29, Noida. …..Respondents. Petition under Section 227 of The Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No. 19 of 2011 registered against the petitioner at PS (East) Chotta Shimla, under Sec. 541 and 506 IPC and also the Summoning Order dated 23.09.2011 issued by the Ld. JMIC (1), Shimla in case No. titled State of HP Versus Sunita Anand and another, along with the final report under Sec. 173 CrPC and all proceedings arising out of the said FIR. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the Petitioner : Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl.A.G. with Mr.J.S.Rana, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No.1. Kuldip Singh, Judge ( Oral). The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petition is likely to fail on technical grounds and, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh. ____________________ Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes …2… The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Cr.M.P. No. 985 of 2011 is also disposed of in view of disposal of the main petition. December 28, 2011 ( Kuldip Singh), (krt) Judge.