[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2447 OF 2008 Shri.Girish Krishnan and three others ..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Dilip Shukla i/b SBG & Asso. Advocate for Applicants Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.386 of 2008 of Malad Police Station, Mumbai. The said case is mainly under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC. 3. The applicant no.1 is husband of the complainant. The applicant nos.2 and 3 are father in law and mother in law of the complainant and applicant no.4 is brother of applicant no.1. [-2-] 4. In her complaint, the complainant has stated that she was illtreated by the applicants. The applicants tortured her and harassed her for not bringing dowry. She was also illtreated as the demand for car was not met. The complainant has stated that her husband and mother in law made her to take some pills against her wish without prescription of the Doctors. The said pills were given to cause abortion of the foetus which she was carrying. Due to said pills, the foetus got aborted. In the complaint, the complainant has given specific acts of torture and illtreatment at the hands of the applicants. In the complaint, she has also stated that her husband forcibly took eight gold bangles from her. The material on record clearly implicates the applicants, hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 5. Application is rejected. Applicants are granted time till 21.8.2008 to surrender. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]