$-5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1437/2011 % SHIV DEVI Petitioner TInrougli Ms. Shashi Jaiswal, Adv. versus NAND KISHORE & ORS. Respondents Tlirougli Mr. D V Goyal, Adv. for R-1 to R-8 Ms. Ritu Guaba, APP for State/R-9 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 23.09.2011 9 1. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and respondents No.l to 8 have amicably settled the issue vide FIR No.402 dated 12.05.2004 under Section 498A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 at PS Nangloi, Delhi against the respondents No.l to 8 by the petitioner. 2. Ld. counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner does not want to pursue the case further in the light of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 12.09.2011. 3. Ld. counsel for the respondents No.l to 8 submits that as per compromise total amount agreed to be paid by the respondents was Rs.1,50,000/- and out of which Rs.50,000/- was paid at the time of Signing Date:27.08.2024 16:57:17 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified r withdrawing the execution petition and Rs.25,000/- has been paid at the time of filing the first motion for divorce. It is also agreed that Rs.75,000/- shall be paid to the petitioner at the time of filing second motion. 4. In these circumstances, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the petition. Liberty granted. 5. CRL.M.C. 1437/2011 is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Needless to state that if the terms of MOD are not complied with the aggrieved party has a right to challenge the same. SURESH KAITJ SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 vid