Civil Revision No. 1025 of 1988 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1025 of 1988 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.10.2010 Union of India and another .....Petitioners Versus Harnam Singh and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioners. Shri Sushant Batish, Advocate, for Shri R.K. Battas, Advocate, for the respondents. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The present petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Executing Court on 3.11.1987, whereby the Executing Court ordered that the payment already made should be adjusted towards the costs, interest, solatium and the market value of the land acquired. The issue whether the payments made by the Judgment Debtor from time to time are to be adjusted towards the costs, interest or principal amount has been adjudicated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India, 2006(8) Supreme Court Civil Revision No. 1025 of 1988 (O&M) [2] Cases 457, wherein the principles as to how the part payments are to be adjusted in satisfaction of the awarded amount have been explained. In view of the said fact, the impugned order passed by the learned Executing Court cannot be sustained. Consequently, the present revision petition is allowed. The impugned order passed by the learned Executing Court is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Executing Court for passing the order afresh keeping in view the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh’s case (supra). [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 11.10.2010 ds