1 Cri.Appln.No.35 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2011 Krishna Lifestyle Technologies & Ors. ... Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Satyavrat Joshi i/by Ms. Vidhi Partners, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 07, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/accused. In the proceedings under section 138 of N.I. Act being C.C.No. 3916/SS/ 2009, an application for compounding of offence in terms of section 147 thereof was moved. The same was turned down. However, by virtue of subsequent directions of this court dated 22.3.2011, the cheque amount was deposited by the petitioner in the capacity as accused before the learned Court. This is reiterated by the learned counsel supported by receipt of such deposition. 2 Cri.Appln.No.35 of 2011 2. On 8.8.2011 this court recorded though served none appears for respondent no. 2 and fresh notice to respondent no. 2 was issued. Inspite of such communication no participation from respondent no. 2. Considering the fact situation, as the amount is deposited by the petitioner on 6.4.2011 before the learned J.M.F.C. CBD Belapur, the purpose of the complaint is achieved. The process issued by the learned Judge in C.C. No.3916/SS/2009 is quashed and set aside. Application is allowed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)