bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 799 OF 2007 Mr. R.N. Kakatkar ... Petitioner V/s KSB Pumps Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Kiran Bapat for the petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 13TH APRIL, 2007. 13TH APRIL, 2007. 13TH APRIL, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the order of the Labour Court passed in Complaint (ULP) No. 1 of 1998 and the order passed in Revision Application (ULP) No. 169 of 2005, 2. The petitioner has filed the complaint under Section 28 read with Item 1(a), (b), (d) and (f) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act before the Labour Court. The Labour Court came to the conclusion that the petitioner was not an employee as defined under Section 3(5) of the MRTU & PULP Act and under Section 2(s) of the I.D. Act. The Labour Court also concluded that the petitioner had not been forced to resign as complained by him. The 2 Industrial Court in revision took the same view considering the judgment of the Labour Court. 3. In my view, there is no need to interfere in the findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below that the petitioner is not an employee. 4. Hence, the petition stands dismissed. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)