1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3305 of 2008 [Gangaputra Macchimar Sah. Sanstha Ltd. Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. K.R. Lambat, Adv., for the petitioner. Mrs. Ketki Joshi, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. P.C. Madkholkar, Adv., for the respondent no.4. ----- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATE : 20th July, 2009. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. K.R. Lambat for the petitioner, learned AGP Mrs. K. Joshi, for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and learned Adv. Mr. P.C. Madkholkar for respondent no.4. 2. It has been pointed out to us that the issue of area extension of respondent no.4- Society was pending in a Revision under Section 152 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act before State Govt., and that revision has been dismissed as barred by limitation. Thereafter, a separate Writ Petition is reported to have been filed challenging that order. 2 3. It is apparent that validity, or otherwise, of allotment of Borada lake to respondent no.4-Society, which has been assailed in present Writ Petition, depends upon the adjudication of the said Revision/Writ Petition. 4. In the circumstances, learned Adv. Mr. Lambat for petitioner states that keeping all issues open, Writ Petition should be allowed to be withdrawn. 5. Writ Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3