IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 516 of 2005 Between: 1 T.Narasimha Rao rep by GPA T.Shyamsundar H.No.12-5-44, Moosapet, Balanagar Mandal. 2 T.Padma Rao rep by GPA T.Shyamsundar H.No.12-5-44, Moosapet, Balanagar Mandal. 3 T.Prabhakar rep by GPA T.Shyamsundar H.No.12-5-44, Moosapet, Balanagar Mandal. 4 T.Parameshwar rep by GPA T.Shyamsundar H.No.12-5-44, Moosapet, Balanagar Mandal. 5 T.Pramod rep by GPA T.Shyamsundar H.No.12-5-44, Moosapet, Balanagar Mandal. 6 Smt.T.Lalitha rep by GPA T.Shyamsundar H.No.12-5-44, Moosapet, Balanagar Mandal. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner Survey Settlement&Land Records 2 The District Collector, Medak Dist at Sangareddy. 3 Revenue Divisional Officer at Sangareddy 4 Mandal Revenue Officer at Jinnaram Manda Medak Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in attempting to assign the land bearing old Sy.No.139,140,145,146,162,163,164,165,171,179, and 181 corresponding to new sy.No.s181 and 182 in all measuring 189.24 acres situated at Kajipally Village, Mandal;Jinnaram, Medak dist as arbitrary and illegal and consequently pleased to direct the respondents not to cause obstruction in peaceful enjoyment of the petitioners over the above lands and pass such further order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.VIJAY KUMAR HEROOR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the admission stage made the following: ORDER: The petitioners claim to be owners of different extents of land in Survey Nos.181 and 182, situate at Kajipally village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak district. The petitioners allege that by mistake, their lands were wrongly mentioned as poramboke lands in the revenue records. The petitioners further submitted that they made an appeal No.P5/143/94 before the 1st respondent to rectify the said error. Questioning the action of the respondents in not disposing of the above appeal, the petitioner filed W.P.35038 of 1997 and the same was disposed of by order dated 23-4-1999 directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioners within a period of three months. It is alleged that in spite of the orders of this Court, so far the 1st respondent has not disposed of the said appeal. It is also submitted that the petitioners made a representation-dated 10.12.2004 to the 1st respondent to implement the orders of this Court dated 23.04.1999 in W.P.No.35038/1997, but the same is not being considered. Hence, the writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for revenue. Both the counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the stage of admission with the following direction; The 1st respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10-12-2004 and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Dated: 24.01.2005 Dsr/Tvk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To: 1 The Commissioner Survey Settlement&Land Records 2 The District Collector, Medak Dist at Sangareddy. 3 Revenue Divisional Officer at Sangareddy 4 Mandal Revenue Officer at Jinnaram Manda Medak Dist. 5 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 6 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MVK}