^. PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH : BILASPUR WRiT PETiTION fSI N0. 2032 OF 2009 D.R. Kurre, S/o Shri Sakha Ram Kurre, aged about 48 years, Employed as Assistant Grade-IIS, O/o Executive Engineer, E8M, L.M. Tube Well & Gate, Raipur Div., Water Resources Department, Raipur, Resident of Janata Qr< No.1, Sndravati Colony. Raipur (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh. through ihe Secretary, Water Resourc^ Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur - 492001 (CG). 2. The Superintending Engineer, Administration, O/o Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resourc^ Department, Raipur - 492001 (CG). 3. The Chief Engineer. Mahanadi Godavari Basin, Water Resources Department, Raipur-492001(00). 4. The Executive Engineer, E & M, LM, Tubeweit and Gato Div., Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, Raipur - 492001 (Writ petltion under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of Jndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :• Shri B.P. Rao, counsej for the petiUoner. Shri Aiok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate with Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this20IFrdayof April, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merit. at this stage. However, learned counsel prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consid^- the pending representatlon of the petitioner (Annexure P/12) within a stipulated period. 2) Shri Bakshi, learned Govt. Advocate appearing with Ms Ghai, Jeamed Panel Lawyer for the State, submits that if the representation of the petitioner is pending. the same shatl be considered and dedded in accordance with law, on jts own merits, as early as pcesible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3) In view of the foregoing, according to learned counsel for the petitioners, nothing survives jn this petition for adjudication. 4) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sausi^suboui judge