H!GH COURT QF JUDiCATURE Ch!HATT'SQARH:B!LASPUR Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Shri S.R. Navak. CJ Wrst Petstion No.6445 OF 20Q5 <? 1 M/?i Para/4i??<s a r?artd P?srth^r?shi!n firtn 'i?w* ' '** "*'*^""" j*' n«n ihrough partner Kanhaiya Lai Nainani aged 72. years S/o late •Jagat Ma! Nainani, R/o Civ!! Llnes, Raipur, Towi-i, Tahsii and District Raipur ('C.G.) ?lf!<srJ 7'? vaiartt -^/A Issf^ i'^nj ****J*^***>! h»,g^"M t »N Jf'WIHt*»rf, ^fft'W lWt^'f J*«^»»h mai Nainani, at M/s Paradise, Kiran Buiiding, •Jaj Stam&h Chowk, Ralpur, C.G. rs /^t-.-—.^i-=*—.—-l—.- -_—.»-1 -^o ...-.». <? /* *jE!5[!S{iysi;n'ja&, a9y*j &t0 yis?. o/&* Kanhaiyalai Nainani, at Paradise, Kiran Rf"!ri!nn Jssi .^ifatnhh r.hAwf<r Rstiniir f^/•S U/ll^IIUIt l^t WWtI •U'**<Ilf>lll*fI IN'ItWlm, I »UIIp*-»01; ^rf-.^rf-. V»r<sifR RssDQndsnSs &ssss€ 5. 6. Stets of Chhattisgarh through sscretary to t'ne department or iocai seif govemment and urban devsloDment. D.K.S. Bhawan. Secretariate, Raipur, C.G. Municipal corporation, Raipur throuah it's CQfnmissionsf. Sardar Mohindsr Singh -Sando so" of 'ate Kripai Singh ai Kiran Buiiding, jai Stambh Chowk Raipur Town, Tahsii a"d District, E?-=Snii;- /rt /'s r^a;pU! ^.u.^ Sardar Sukhdev Singh Sando son of late (!<f*'irka! -^inrfh .^anrin ?»f' Kirian RiHldinrf -laf i t.1 tprwi.i »/i>tyv wv.1 fw»v, ^iith i 111 w.1 t ^iylritifw** i^jf •hr*A> Siambh Chowk, Raipur Town, Tahsii and District, Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Kutdeop Ksuf widow of late Gurusharan Singh at Kiran Buiiding, Jai StsiTrbh Chowk. RsiDur Town. TahsL' snd Disfrict, Raipur C.G.) Sardar Sirat Singh son of Hardeep Singh at Kiran Builuing, Jas Stambh Chowk, Raipur Town, Tahsii and District, Raipur (C.G.) Sardar Ba!jset Singh son of Hardsep Singh at Kiran Buiiding, jai Siambn Chowk, Raipur Town, Tahsii and Distrjct, Raipur (C.G.) Shri Bhishma Kinger, learnec) counsel forth®petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verna, ieamed Dy. G.A. for the State/respondent No.1 Shr' H.B. .Acirswst. 'ssmsci Sr. Advocsts with Shri Psnte Agrawai, iearned counsei for rsspondeni No.2. -2-' QRAL ORDER (Passed on22n'rofbecember 2005) Ths pstitioners ciasmed to bs tsnants of the shops situate at the grQund floor of bui'dsng known as Kiran Buiiding at Jai Stambh Square, G.E. Road, Ra'pur, under respondsnts 3 to 7. ji is aHsged that the State Qovsrnmsnt, ths ^rst r^pondent horein in order to bssutify tho cspitsl csty of Raipur had taks" steps to evict ths pst'tioners frQm the shops. It is syerrsd thst thsro fs sn undorstsnciinQ b6tw©QEirosoQHdonts 1 snci 2 on ths ons hsnd snd fssDopdci^ts 3 to ? on th& othsr hsnd IQ Du!i down ths bui'ding whsre th®petitionsrs' shops are situatsd a"d the Goysrpn'ient wrii*!rl allnf ialEtiam^t'iwja !?inH <^f aniKal 'ar^fl! hv t'&?tr>nn?idt^t'<s '1.^.9 i'n feiV/<Mjr r*f ItlVWIfM Klll-^lk lAl-lrfl I t^AM »-•«/ !<*>.»* •^> •Wt^.MKlI tOI VUt IlrfJ I •VWfrfWI 1«WII >W* f-Wtfc. »I lUttfl/MI v f^sDQnd^nts 3 to 7 on th©sdiscent isnd £>fssenS!v csiisd tho Suodt. of Rsilwsv Po!'cs O^sco ofcniisQS to rsiss s nsw buildiriQ. Et Is cQH^o'sinsd thst thouah ths DstttionQfs srs in sctus' DOSSOSS o" of ths shoos. thoy u/Qra n^f cs'Jsd for discussion. nor thsy WQFQ snsds Dsrtiss to th© undArst3ndinQ srrivod st botwssn th©rssDQndonts 1 snd 2 on the ons hspid 2nd rssDOp.dsnts 3 to 7 on ths QUiQr h.snd. Ths D&titionsfs havo ffirthat' saivorrAd thaf fh^v ^iro ^nrninrt 11v^lihri/v4 frftr" fh^ hi'clnac^ thoy iui u iwi Wt u •»/ii ^/%n U IIAt. M 1-WJ Wtl ^r •'K^ai « •II 15^ Itffl/IIItWW iivti hiiw hoinviii iiyw^ 1.1 ivj CSFTVOP> IP. tho sublsct shQos snd if thsy sro sv'ctsd from tho sho&s thst wouid sffsct thsir sourcs of IlvsHhooci. Wlth th!s abovs D!ssdfncis, ths DotitiQHsrs hsvss souQht for ths fQ!!owf"Q rTtsin rsEiofs '. In VE9W Of ths 'fSCtS tTisntiotisd sbovs. th& Dsti^oriSE' rysost rsso^ctfu!Ev anc! humb'v Dravs thst ths H.Qrs'blo Court mgy l^inHiy h@ pi&ased to isstis s writ of certiQrsri, r^Bp.dsmus, direction or any othsr approp"ate writ for the fQ!!owing reiisfs : s). To cs" for ths records from ths r^sondonte fsistino to the subfQct msttsr for insDsct'on Qf th©rdevsnt pap9rs snc! sdjudicstion of tho disputs. t[\ TQ rlif^Qf thg r$SDOP.d9ntS to fifst construct 2 n?'Ap>ftc:»H h<fi!rfinri wiifhr>!!t nrAlK/'lir-ia ITI fh«& i"tAr^<sf<; ^nfi WiVtfty ititiwt-^Mh w-^^^'wtw *v ..i.w >. i»viv^hU *ni i-u •^o -3 ^'^^^^s^' ^••3; .i;^-^^^1'' rights of the petitionsrs i" rsspsct Qf their tenancy of four portions. iii). To direct the respondents to deiiver vacant posssssion of and induct ths petitioners intQ ths four portions of ths new building abso!ute!y corresponding to ths same arsa, size, tocat'on ofthsir origina! existing shops/port'ons o" ths sams tsrms and conditions as obtain today bstwes" ths &&titiori9rs snd thc rosooTid^Hts No.3 to 7 unlsss. of coutso. both tho Dsrtiss siT!icsfe!s sotfis ^sffsfsnt or nsw f©rfTis In wfitlno by niutus! conssnt snd furthsr dirsct thst sDsrt ffQjn footoath thsre 'A'ou'd bs r*o other CQnstructio" or Qbstructio" i" front of the said shQps/portions SQ that ths denrsed portions ars easily accessib's fQr."' the G.E. Road. iv) TQ a'.'rard costs ofthe pet'tion. >.'} TQ issus a"y other appropriate wnt, order or d'rection sn fa'/our of the petitionsrs and agajnst the rsspondents ss dssmed just and proper o" the facts and in f|^Q c rcuiTtstsncss of th©csso. A carsfu! psrusa! of the rsl'sfs sought in this v/"t pstition '."Qu'd go to show that pstitioners ars sssidng JnjURction pure and si.'T'p!0 to protsct their s!!sged rights o"sr ths subject shops 'n ths capacity of ths tenants undsr rsspondents 3 to 10. ! am of the considsrsd opin'on that the disDUts brouoht before this court is esssntiaily civi! in naturs and aris'/ance of fhs pstjfionsrs is sminent'y a fit subjsct for a suit bsfors th& jurisdictior'a! Court. !n that *"ev.' of ths mattsr, thsrs is "o nssd for me to express any /)*2jrttQrt Qrj fpQi'jt of f^Q mSftSf. it i'S QUi'tQ OftSH ssid snd rs'terstsd by th© CQurts thst-i^-tho CSSQS of Issndsd DrQDOfSsos. dsclsrstion snc! iniunctiQn b1 way of privats law reyisw wou'd bs mors efficacious and cQmpreheRSi'/e thap tho tTssndsmys that msv bs Qfsntsd bv thss Court ursdsr Articis 22S of ths Constitution of !ndia. The writ Court cannot be converted into a Ci'.'i! Court to sntertai" ths kind of gris'/a,"ce which is brought before this Court K' M |iaBat«l<®y -^-:: in th(s prssop.t csss. Furthsr, !t wss cQfitsndsd hy 'Qsmsc! counssl for ths f'haf •f'hia rom«aH^/ av?ajliah!^ hfifnrQ 1-hoi Cih/i! ^ftiirf- in f'ho /^rkntdvf' pir'wuwwi »%/> w *.it*oh vf fw wivfwwt^ *<i v KIIXAWI «-' iwwi vi <-> u i w •k^-i v i > •u'vi^it. »i >.«>*/ •»/•»<>«li.'w^/'^.i. of ths C3SQ Es not sfficsciQus snd it ss 2 tims consuminQ QHQ. ! do not thirlk so. Aft$f 1978 smsndmsnt to C.P.C.. ths C-ivH Courts sr9 confsrrsd with  sxtr^ordinsry oowsr to DSSS SGDroDristo !nt©t'fmofdsrs i" ths csss of ufQencios. oy9n bofQro the sxDifv of statutQlv "otico CQntsmoE3tsd undsr SQction SQ of CPC. B©thst 25 it ir'sy.! do not f'nd snv 'sos! bssis for ths nisin rs!iof SQuoht in this wnt DStltion thst tho rssDQndsnts sh2l! bs dli'sctsd not to cyict th©Detitionsrs frQfn thd subiscf shoos un!sss snd upti! s!i f^f fhom aro nrAviflS<sr) wlfh ?>lftafn<af'iv<a a^/'/^rrtrnr^risfjftn d|<£^wh<ar<a <^!ifth p»B •W »lt*fWh« Itllblll »«»«•••/> I I»llhl V <rf IA-WW1/I I tl I 1 VN«k«*lt»t« t/I'WUt ** I l'»/l-^. trf'Wl-U'tt fiQht csnnot bs trscod froiTs 3"y of tho Drovlsions of T.P. Act or SRV Qthor !aw. !" th$ rssuit. ! dismiss this writ Dotition. howsvsr. fQssrvirtcs I'bsrtv to ths pstitioners to work out their !ega! remedies bsfors the jurisdictiQnal civ'! QOjjr^^ In f^9 QyQpf f^f fhQ DQtJfJQHefS JnStitytlnQ 5U!t b©fQrd ths lurisdictioHS' civi! Court, such Couit shs!! try 2nd disposs of the suit QH its own merit v/ithQUt being in any way influsnced by any of ths Qbssp/atiorss mads by mQ iri this ordor. Thsrs shs!I bo HQ ordsr ss So cost. --------—— Sd/- CAiefjusdce