IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46589 of 2008 RAM CHANDRA DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.12.2008 Heard Sri Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 307 etc IPC and the petitioner is said to have pierced a Chura into the rib cage of the informant from his back. The learned Sessions Judge in his order has indicated that it was a protrusion measuring 1”x1/2”x captivity. Regard being had to the nature of the allegation and the seriousness of the injury, I am not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. However, as soon as the informant of the case is examined by the trial court the petitioner could renew his prayer for bail before the trial court itself. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )