KBP 1406-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1406 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.651 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITON NO.1624 OF 2009 Shri.Eknath Shankar Paradhi, since deceased through his legal heirs 1a.Smt.SumanEknath Paradhi and ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Bhikaji Laxman Bhuwad ..Respondent ......... Dr.P.K.Deshmukh, for petitioners. Mr.Vijay Ghorat, for respondent. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 27 th August, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. A case for restoration is made out. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “a” and “b” ( A.S.OKA, J. ) KBP 1406-09.sxw 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.1624 OF 2009 Eknath Shankar Paradhi ..Petitioner Vs. Bhikaji Laxman Bhuwad ..Respondent ......... Mr.Dr.P.K.Deshmukh, for petitioners. Mr.Vijay Ghorat, for respondent. ......... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 27 th August, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. As a remedy under the statute is available to the petitioner, this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not entertained and the same is rejected by keeping the statutory remedy of the petitioner open. 2] To enable the petitioner to adopt the appropriate remedy, the decree for possession shall not be executed for a period of six weeks from today. ( A.S.OKA, J. )