IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.129 OF 2009. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.129 OF 2009. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.129 OF 2009. IN IN IN SUIT NO.3608 of 2001. SUIT NO.3608 of 2001. SUIT NO.3608 of 2001. Deepak Misrimal Jain ..Plaintiff versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ..Defendants and Daksha Deepak Jain & Anr. ..Applicants and State Bank of Hyderabad ..Respondents Mr.B.Saraf i/b. K. Thakordas & Co. for applicant Mr.H.C.Pimple for B.M.C. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 4th February, 2009. DATED : 4th February, 2009. DATED : 4th February, 2009. P.C. 1. Applicants want that they should be permitted to renew the bank guarantee No.13 of 1990 dated 21.8.1990. The said bank guarantee was given as the original plaintiff who has now expired had withdrawn certain amount from the Court. In my view the Chamber Summons can be disposed of by passing the following order to enable the applicants to renew the bank guarantee. If such permission is not granted there shall be no cover -2- for the monies which have been withdrawn earlier. Hence the Order. ORDER . The present applicants are permitted to renew the bank guarantee bearing No.13 of 1990, dated 21.8.1990, issued by State Bank of Hyderabad, Vile Parle Branch, towards withdrawal of Rs.17,14,454.98. This renewal shall be for a period of one year from the date of renewal. 2. Respondent, State Bank of Hyderabad are directed to take steps to renew the bank guarantee in terms of this order. 2. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. State Bank of Hyderabad, Vile Parle Branch shall act upon the copy of this Order duly authenticated by the P.A. of this Court. 4. Chamber Summons disposed of accordingly. -3- (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)