R.F.A. No.329 of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No.329 of 2007 Date of Decision:20.07.2011 Hawa Singh through his LRs and others ......Appellants Versus State of Haryana through Land Acquisition Collector, Jind .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Sunil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr.Anjum Ahmed, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent. **** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in the present appeal is squarely covered and is liable to be disposed of in the same terms of the judgment dated 02.02.2011, in a bunch of appeals, decided along with main R.F.A. No.2106 of 2006 titled as State of Haryana Vs. Banwari and others, passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (Rajesh Bindal, J.), the operative part of which is, as under:- “Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the issues raised in the present set of appeals are similar to what was raised in the appeals which have been disposed of vide judgments dated 19.1.2011 passed in RFA No.2564 of 2005 – Kailasho and others Vs. State of Haryana and dated 20.1.2011 passed in RFA No.2112 of 2006 – Pawan and others Vs. State of Haryana, whereby this court while setting aside the impugned awards, remitted the cases back to the learned court below for fresh decision after permitting the parties to lead further evidence to justify their claim. Acquisition in the present set of appeals and the cases already decided is for the purpose of construction of various small drains in the same area. R.F.A. No.329 of 2007 2 The learned court below also determined compensation in the same manner. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgments, the present appeals are also disposed of in the same terms. The parties through their counsels are directed to appear before learned District Judge, Jind on 5.3.2011. It would be appropriate if District Judge clubs the cases with the cases remitted earlier. The learned court below shall dispose of the cases expeditiously preferably by the end of year 2011 after affording adequate opportunities to both the parties, may be by giving short dates.” In this view of the matter and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their valuable assistance and after deep consideration of the entire matter, the impugned award is set aside and the instant appeal is hereby disposed of in the same terms of the judgment dated 02.02.2011 of this Court in Banwari and others's case(supra). The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the concerned Court of the Additional District Judge, Jind, on 22.09.2011, for further proceedings. July 20, 2011 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) seema JUDGE R.F.A. No.329 of 2007 3