IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 66 of 2011(S) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- UDAYAKUMAR C., S/O.CHANDRAN S,"CHANDRALAYAM",NEAR TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, KUNNATHURMEDU PO,PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR ENERAL OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THRISSUR-680001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION,PALAKKAD-678001. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HEMAMBIKANAGAR POLICE STATION,'PALAKKAD-678001. 6. PRADEEP, S/O.BALASUBRAMANIAN,G-4,OLD RAILWAY QUAERTERS, KARUR, KARUR DISTRICT,TAMILNADU-639 001. 7. V.P.KRISHNAN, RAILWAY QUAERTERS NO.122 A & B, RAILWAY COLONY, PALAKKAD-678001 R1 TO R5 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.KAMMAPPU. R7 BY ADV. SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) R6 BY ADV. SRI.R.SREEHARI SRI.K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR 66 OF 2011: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MARRIAGE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF ATHUL KRISHNA, THE SON OF THE PETITIONER AND PRIYA V.P. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 2.2.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY COURIER SERVICE ON SENDING EXT.P3. EXT.P5.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 2.2.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.3. EXT.P6.TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.3. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.) No.66 of 2011-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 28th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner is the husband of the alleged detenu. Detention is alleged against 6th respondent. 2. Today the alleged detenu, the petitioner and also the 6th respondent were present. We interacted with the alleged detenu. We also interacted with the parents of the 6th respondent. We allowed the alleged detenu to interact with the petitioner. We also heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the 6th and 7th respondents. The alleged detenu would say that there is no illegal detention and she is residing in the house of the 6th respondent. She would also say that she is not inclined to go with the petitioner. The petitioner is also not prepared to take her. In view of the situation as available at present, we do not see any reason to further prosecute this matter. Accordingly, we close the matter. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS