^— ^ ^ 11:1 (^ s-^ d( IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. N0. ^-& ^^ J2005 PETITIONER /. Dev Narayan Ram S/o Shri Ram Kishan, aged about 45 years, R/o Village Pratappur, P.S. & Tahsil Pratappur, Dist : Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS RBS^ONDENTS .,?&€>^ \^%/" yy/^ ..-•^'.. y"\^' ^ ^'^%^ ^ ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Collector of Surguga, Ambikapur, Dist : Surguja (C.G.). 2 Tahsildar of Pratappur P. S. & Tahsil Pratappur, Dist : Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L_:___... |^%^:3:-T XI-HC-78 ^wf ^ww^, t?-al^-i<i<»,^irtK-iy^ HPTc5T ^m^ • p-f-^o—<to°7... .. ^200^ 3TT^5T q^cp (licrf361^) 3n^^T^Tf^ric^ ^3TT^^T^HN) ^m^R^Tt^T^^T 13,6.2005 Shn Bhupendra Siagtj.; Shri P.S. Koshy, Shrivastava, Paiiel Law}rer fdp Heard. The petitioner after a| from sendce by order dat^ Sarguja, Ambikapur. This Admittedly, no appeal was tliat instead of fiUiig aa apj Bient was made and in dated 15.3.2005 was pass| sayiiig that the 22.12.2004 is dismissed. petitioner has not challen^ 08.11.1999byfflinga has directly conie to this At tiiis stage, leaiiiec| that the petitioner raay be appeal before ttie conceiTie^ •M.P.(C.G) Civil Seivices (Cla^ 1966, He also submits baiTed som.e observations bd if tlie saine is filed along\¥i^ delay. ., counsel for tlie petitioner, ty Advocate General witli Shri Paiikaj r fh-e State on advance copy. puirsuaiice thslt cM^[o41'ri ^i*-ic^'^Tsl-<S1 \Fjt<«i>( ^ 3Tf^T 3TT^5T depaitsiiental enquiiy was renioved t^d 08.11.1999 passed by CoUector, ^rder has been filed as Annexiirc P-5, agamst this order aad it appears l^eal, sonie appUcation for reappoiat- of fhe same, aiiother order ^d by the Upper Collector, Sarguja for reappoiatinent niade on outcome at this stage is that the |ed the validity of fhe order dated appeal against the sanie aad in this petition, counsel for the petitioner submits ^iven a Ubert}7 to file a departniental ^. authority under the provisious of .si&cation, Control aa.d Appeal) Rules since the appeal has become time made for consideration of the appeal PI aii application for condonation of applicatjion 1|he depai|tmental coutrt 0 ^ccT --<iiqirt<4, tp-a1<<i<i<s, fqoi^y1< <1MOI ^TT^ 3TT^^Tcy5Tf^=rtm ^m3T^^T^3m^ ^<0 .lft).:.?:..^.p.'...fls.p.G.^. 3Tf^?T q?q? (^cli^cl^) ^200^ ^T^TT^^f^ 3T1^$T -Z-- Lookuig to the facts prayers are allowed. The writ petition is to the petitioner to file aa a^ alongwith tlie a.pplication forj tliat if such aa appeal is f alongivith aii application for| anihoritv shaU consider the dispose of the appeal io. acco^ It is made clem' tliatl opiiiion on nierits of the cas^ delay whicli is uwolved iii fh^ Consequently, I.A. No. stand disposed of C,C. as per rules. a^id circumstances of the case, these AT \j ^S SP'/FS/2005 - 20,000 <Pl^fc'>41rl^l^c<>T^feL3^R?l^-cR ^3ri^T31I^9T pejrmitted to be wifhdrawn wifh Uberty tpeal before the competent aiithority [condonation of delay. It is observed EUed witliiii one month from today lcondonation of delay tlie concenied 4-pplication for condonation and shall t'daiice witli law. this court has aot expressed aiiy as^ or ia relation to fhe condonation of inatter. 1591/2005 and I.A.No.3788/2005 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge '^^ iv^\^