IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10259 of 2011 ================================================== == TAPESAR YADAV @TAPESHWAR YADAV - Petitioner/s(s) Versus MOHAN LAL YADAV & ORS - Respondent/s(s) ================================================== == Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY NO.- 5 For the Respondent/s: Mr. ================================================== == CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO DATE: 04-07-2011 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO) ________ 4. 04.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 24.8.2009 passed by the learned Sub Judge-6th, Gopalganj in final decree proceeding in Title Suit No. 16 of 2001 whereby the learned court below has rejected the objection of the petitioner to the pleader commissioner’s report. Since the rejection of the objection will amount to confirmation of the pleader commissioner’s report, on the basis of which now the final decree will be 2 prepared, the petitioner has got the right to file appeal against the decree under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Therefore, I am not inclined to examine the correctness or otherwise of the impugned order in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may challenge the order in the appeal that may be filed by him against the final decree. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)