Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No : 3015 of 2008. Date of Decision : 13.07.2011. Kusum Sood …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? - For the petitioner : Mr. R. R. Rahi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A. K. Bansal, Addl. Advocate General, for respondent No.1 to 4. : Ms. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.5. Surinder Singh, J. (Oral): The learned counsel for the parties have fairly and squarely admitted that the present case is covered by the judgments of this Court passed in CWP (T) No.7712/2008 decided on 19.05.2009 by the Hon’ble Single Judge and Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P. and LPA No.36/2010 decided on 15.07.2010 by the Principal Bench of this Court. Thus, the petitioner is entitled for counting of her tenure service followed by regular service for the purpose of increment and pension, whereas the increments stand paid, - 2 - the relief sought is now for pension, therefore, the respondents are hereby directed to count the tenure service of the petitioner towards the pension of the petitioner as per circular EDN-A-CHHA (15)-4/1994 dated 02.11.1995 issued by the respondent-State. For the above stated reasons, the matter with respect to the pension be finalised within a period of two months from today, failing which the respondents shall pay interest @ 6% per annum from the date it fell due. The petition stands disposed of. 13th July, 2011. (Surinder Singh), k.sharma Judge.