ladda wp­3427­10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3427 OF 2010 Ravindra Arjun Sawant ...Petitioner Versus Smt Naliniraje Ravhojirao Jadhav ...Respondent Mr Anil S. Gawas, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr S.G. Karandikar, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 8th September, 2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This writ petition arises out of the proceeding under section 70 (b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (the Tenancy Act for short). The petitioner’s application under the said Section was dismissed by the Tahsildar and this order is confirmed by the Sub Divisional Officer and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, in an appeal and ladda wp­3427­10 revision respectively. Thus, there is concurrent finding of all the three Authorities below that the petitioner could not make out any case for declaration under section 70 (b) of the Tenancy Act. Admittedly, there is no documentary evidence in petitioner’s favour including in the form of 7-12 extract. The concurrent finding is also recorded that the petitioner is not in possession of the suit property. In fact, in a civil proceeding there is injunction issued against the petitioner by the civil court. 3. That apart, the petitioner, in order to prove his case, has examined one Vasant Narayan. This witness in his cross-examination has admitted that the petitioner is serving in MSEB. He has further admitted that the petitioner do not possess agriculture implements. He has further stated that the suit property is not being cultivated and there are naturally grown wild bushes in the suit land. Taking over all facts and circumstances into consideration, I agree with the finding recorded by the lower courts that the petitioner failed to make out any case of his tenancy on the suit property. No error is pointed out in the impugned order so as to enable me to interfere in writ jurisdiction of this Court under article 227 of the Constitution. Petition is dismissed. (RANJIT MORE, J.)