bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3967 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3968 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3969 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3970 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3971 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3975 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3976 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3977 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3978 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3979 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3980 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3994 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. Central Bank of India ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 9TH JULY, 2009 1. All these appeals are barred by limitation. Admittedly, no notices of motion are taken out. There is no prayer for condonation of delay. No sufficient cause is shown. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C. DAGA, J.)