IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.973 of 2007 The Managing Director, the Nawada Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Nawada. ...Respondent- Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar. Patna. 3. The Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5. The Branch Manager-cum- Loan Manager, Nawada Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Nawada. ... Respondents.... Respondents. 6. Narendra Kumar, son of late Musafir Singh, resident of Mohalla- Ram Nagar, P.S. and Dist.- Nawada, presently Chairman, Board of Directors, The Nawada Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Nawada. .... Petitioner--- Respondent. 7. Nawal Kishore Prasad Singh, son of late Jageshwar Singh, resident of village- Oraina, P.S. Nawada Muffasil, District- Nawada. 8. Bangali Paswan, son of Late Rameshwar Paswan, resident of village- Bhanail, P.S. Akbarpur, District- Nawada. 9. Kavindra Deo, son of late Musafir Singh, resident of Mohalla- Ram Nagar, P.S. and Dist.-Nawada. 10. Shanti Devi, W/o late Yamuna Ram, resident of village- Asharhi, P.S. Nawada, District- Nawada. ... Intervener petitioner- Respondents. ----------- 08- 7.5.2010 The respondent Bank through the Managing Director of the writ proceeding is in appeal questioning the validity of the order dated 30.10.2007, passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 1609 of 2007. 2. We have heard Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh, and Mr. Ram Suresh Roy, learned counsel representing the 2 appellant and the private respondents respectively. It appears that election/co-option in issue was held in the year 2003. The normal tenure of the office is 05 years which expired in 2008. The election process for constitution of the Board has already begun inasmuch as the elections at the primary level have been completed. 2. In that view of the matter, we are of the view that the present appeal has lost its significance/relevance and the same does not require to be dealt with on merits. We only clarify that the findings recorded by the learned Single Judge, in the circumstances, shall not enure to the benefit of any one of the party to the proceeding. 3. This appeal is accordingly disposed of. (S K Katriar, J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.) S.K.Pathak/