•sf 'W'caSiSoi. f&njVs'W ffut&ifiliaE' ^rSfeASro&' fc., o.y VSTt_fSS'Z7TW^ig}^Hct* I ^4 /2flM f ipStiTses^BSts ^ ^ ^o ^vy , ff^yx /.--^^>/ ^^ >/^c;\^" .'••'<^@^ -y, ^' l* QB'vSatiraiB Xasayap son a.f Siwi B®oSaraya 'Kastiya® agefi 49-years Res.'ttaQat esf eaaBdliDara. Sastgarla Thidia Pasigarh aistr-lct ffaFijgsr- <3aaB")a» Oi»Bsr aivislea Teacher Oevt. MlMie Sohool ^i palcarlya (Jbeel aaj M®ck • &aacatl®aitfialtara RIstrlct •TcffljgAr-CtMajpa (C.G»}. ^•2. Bfeayat Prasad-DbdreRiara' ageel 3]. jeaxa SOR' ef-Sfarl iffi'eraw SIaa'raiSra SesiSwt ®f%l.Ita<geXhafcel'a;P@st. : Bargawaa :'V3.a'' alta.ca Blsfet. 'TaSjglr-e&aiBBa. V-ppes 'Blvy. slea Teacher Parsa'nl* wEspwwwes WHIT pBTTTIW ^?1». . Sttefee ofGtos&tlsgara^ a'liaaa^to 1'iae; Secreiidry •iiiii».i.n i»iB'i Q^:.»iS*^KiausR.aalFttr ai'stt. SalmriC-G.^' • ^2. Tfe®at;reetBr Pifllia.la •Xa sfe»iAles - Separtaeat. iSalme Mstb.aalwr (C.S.), / 3. iMstcl.ct SfSiGat.&a Offl-GeE, :3'»i3t)<P QIst^:,,,-3'aBJ§lr- -Qiam^a tC.G.}., ; /4,' S.o'cK^ BfiacatAsa.Offi'eei:^' , al-tara Ba.st.ciet'JaBJgir- Gbampa ,S:e.@«). MiTTtl.S ^22g::: OF tE®:t it *1WiriBi! ii nuiii-mi.ihj 1 lftdTOmiHtt*ffNt(» <aMr^EtroT:rca;.Cw:::o'r®r3k lii' -:l;:j ^ ^-f HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 156 of 2010 Petitioners Govtndram.Kashyapfisanother Versus Respondeuts State of Chliattisgarh aud bthers (Writ Petition uiider Article 226 oftfae Coustitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Suiya Kaut Mishra,Advoeate for the petitiLoners. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDERtOrall (Passed on this 13th day ofJaauaiy;, 2010) Heard. i Leam.ed counsel appearuig for fhe petitioners subnuts that the petitioners were appoiated as Assistaat Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 150/-. After completion of probation period, fhe petitioners were granted regiilar pay scale. Leamed couusel further subinits that the issue involved in. the case is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale wifh effect fiioin fhe date of initial appointiaent or after coinpletion ofprobation perfod. The issue iavolved, heieiu, was cousidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Adininistrative Tribuaal, Jabalpur in O.A.No. 2745/89 (Madhukaat Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & ofhers), wherein it was held fhat the smularly situated teachers are eatifled to regiilar pay scale w.e.f. fhe date of initial appoiutment. The inatter was taken up to Hon'ble Supreaie Court ia Special Leave Petition (CivU) No. 6832/93.The said petition was dismissed by fhe Hon'ble Supreuie Court upholdiug the decision of fhe Tribunal to fhe effect that the Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entitled to regular payscale froin fhe date of initial appointment Leamed couasel also subinits fhat this Court, while consideruig the same issue ia several writ petitions, this Court aBowed the I'MI <t 5. 6. Thdcur ^- 1.^ — petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures wifhina period of ten days, raisiug aU fheir grievaaces aad ia tum the coucemed respondent was directed to decide the representation ia aa objecti.ve inaaner within. a period of 30 days from the date of reeeipt of fhe representation. Aceordiugly, fhe petitioners are graated liberty to inake a representation to the concemed aufhorily. It is expected fhat fhe representation laay be considered aad decMed in accordaace with law withiu a icasonable period, subject to verification offacts. In view offhe above, the petition staads disposed of. No order asto costs. 1 - sd/- t SATISH K. AGNMOTRI ' Jydge <*