1 RPF No.12/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.12 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.429 OF 2009 Mr. Rajiv Ram Labhaya Suri .... Petitioner (Ori. Appellant) Vs. Mandakini D. Bhalerao & Ors. .... Respondents (Ori. respondents) Mr. P.G. Lad, i/by Mr. A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Bhate i/by Mr. S.K. Sthalekar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 30th July, 2010 P.C. 1. This petition for review of the order dated 25th September 2009 passed in the above appeal. Perusal of the said order as also the order impugned in the appeal shows that during the course of the argument in the suit before the trial Court, the learned counsel for the appellant made a statement that the appellant had restricted the suit to the dispute pertaining to the gate. The gate in question was North-East gate. On considering the relevant documents i.e. Agreement dated 11th October 1990 (Exhibit 16) and the consent terms filed in S.C. Suit No.4772 of 1995 (Exhibit 10), it was held that the trial court had correctly decided the 2 RPF No.12/2009 dispute and there could be no view contrary to the same and the appeal was dismissed in limine. 2. According to the applicant, the order under review does not appreciate the facts of the case properly. The remedy of review is not available for such corrections. Hence, the review petition is dismissed as not maintainable. (SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J)