[1] IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1119 OF 2008 Ashok B. Desai .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Sarvasri P.K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Counsel a/w Pankaj Savant i/b M/s. Khaitan & Jaykar for the Petitioner. Sarvasri Ravi Kadam, Advocate General a/w Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for the Respondent No.1. Sri J.G. Reddy for the Respondent No.2. Sri K.K. Singhvi, Senior Counsel a/w Ms Archana Joshi for the Respondent No.3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SRI R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & SRI A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: JULY 23, 2008 P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. In view of the statement made in the affidavit in reply by the Corporation that the proposed scheme will be implemented by the Corporation itself, the learned Advocate for the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition. 2. Before parting with the matter, we must place on record our displeasure for the manner in which some of the members of the public behaved with the officer and staff of the Corporation on 20-6-2008 of which the [2] videograph was taken and was screened for our perusal. It is to be noted that the officers apart from their regular duties were performing the duties pursuant to certain directions issued by this Court and considering the same, interference therein could be dealt with under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. However, at this stage, we do not propose to take any such action. We hope and trust that the concerned members of the public will behave in decent manner with the officers and staff of the Corporation henceforth. With these observations and with the said liberty, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of. (A.A.Sayed, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/J8wp1119.8 sjs/J8wp1119.8 sjs/J8wp1119.8