1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1757 OF 2009 (Doma s/o Shiva Dongre through LRs Smt. Gayabai wd/o Doma Dongre & Ors. vs. Nilkanth Raghobaji Dongre) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 15, 2010. Heard Shri Dhabe, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Futane, learned counsel for the respondent. The impugned order removes para 7 from additional written statement filed by legal representatives on record. The reason is it is contrary to para 19 of written statement already placed on record by the deceased. Shri Dhabe, learned counsel states that after said para 7 was incorporated in additional written statement, matter proceeded further and the case was at the stage of recording of evidence. Shri Futane, learned counsel states that as the legal representatives have taken a plea contrary to the plea of original defendant, trial Court has correctly removed that portion. It is an admitted position that subsequently evidence of parties is also closed and the matter is at the stage of final arguments. 2 In Writ Petition No. 4314 of 2009 disposed of today, this Court has made the suit time bound. In view of this subsequent development, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. The challenge to impugned order is kept open and the petitioners – defendants are at liberty to challenge the order, if occasion therefor arises, after final arguments. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.