[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION {LODGING} NO.34 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION {LODGING} NO.34 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION {LODGING} NO.34 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3912 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.813 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.369 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3157 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3157 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3157 OF 2007 IN REVIEW PETITION {LODGING} NO.34 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3912 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.813 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.369 OF 2006 Nina Anil Shah .... Appellant Vs. Kusum Bhaskarrao Gorule @ Geetanjali Ganesh Sohane .... Respondent Shri S.M. Sakhardande for the Appellant/ Review Petitioner. Shri M.P. Rao, Senior Counsel with Dr. (Mrs.) R.R. Ajinkya for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 P.C: P.C: P.C: Heard. It is the contention on behalf of the appellant that there was error on the part of the arbitrator in calculating the liability towards the expenses. The learned counsel for the appellant states that in order to enable the appellant to move necessary amendment to the memo of the appeal and thereafter to [2] take appropriate proceedings, the appellant craves leave to withdraw the present petition at this stage. The petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of. In view of the above, the notice of motion accordingly stands disposed of. (Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) sjs/S7rpl34.7 sjs/S7rpl34.7 sjs/S7rpl34.7