^^— Y s^.u^.1^^^.--^^^^.^ \. ^^ -^" PETITIONER IN_..THtlHK3H COUBT ©FJUDICJWJRE OF m^D-HIA PRADESH AT JABX1..PUR Wfit.pefcifcion HB^>^JI ^D/94 BH^GWANDAS KHAHPXRI'^/ aged ^^ years, son of-'Shri Babulal Khaiaparlya / occupatlon conferacfcor^ fehrough his reoognised agenfc and son Prakash Khamparlya^ resldent of Tillage Pondi Khurd^ Tahsil Sihora^ Disfcrict Jabalpur, M.P. Versus <^ 1 Union of India, "\ through the Secreta?&Y^ Minlstry of SMpping & Trapsporfc^ Road .^ing^ New telhi RESPONDENTS SX.. .z'"^,... ^ .2 Shri K.N. Khare, Executtve Bngineer^ Mational HiAway Division, Jagdalp^r^ Bisfcfc* Basfcar, MePo 3 Superlntending EBgineer, sratlonal Highway Bivislon^ Raipur, D^stfc^ Ralpur, M^p. PETITIGN 17KDER ARTICLE 226 GF TI1E CONSTITaTION_ OF INDIA ^.-.- ^- ""^s^ ;^fe^%5 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITIQN N0.3996 OF 1994 Bhagwandas Khampariya Versus Union of India & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : hlon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.l/Union of India. None for the respondent No.2. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 26th day of July, 2011) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. Th^ petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter 2. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner as well as to the respondent No.2 forthwith. —— Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Gowri