^^ ^ \^v W<CTI »*<1<1» 75ET ^i^ici^,.^Tti^^i<o, f®i<ni^^< .^...M..lri.?.-...l.fc^oo 3TI^?T J^ (liq^q<i4) SFil^T^t^W ^OTT ^Tl^T s^^w ^y^- ^.y ^, ^Rrrw^ftn^n^T APPLiGANT COMPLALNANT Heeram^iii Shukla, sou of Shri Raghun^tli Prasad Shukla, aged about 57 years, ^raach Manager, Buaspur Raipur Kshetiiy|t Grajniii Bank, Brao.ch Bilaspur (CG), F^/o Maiachaura, Seepal Road, BUaspuil Talisil and Distt. BUaspm' (CG) Yeysus RBSPQNDBNT Shri R, GramLiti CGn'TEMFT FETITIGH OhU, Chairmaa, Chhattisgarh ?aak, Saruta Colony, Raipur (CG) UffDBRSSCTiGN 215 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA K&AD WITH SECTION 12 OrTME CONTEMPT t>FCOURTACT sB: HON.SHRI DHIREHDRA MI l^i-snno Nouc appears for the applic Shri Asiiish Suraiia, Adv, f< Even io. second caU, uone a| I.A. No. 1 This is aii application for ta The application is allowed, Leaaied counsel for tli€ respondent No, 1 was dtrected to above tlie respondent No. 2 aiid \- determiauig the seniority flowuig document filed by the respondei^t dated 17-3-2008, it was couten^ prepared as per tlie direction 4)1^^^ ^Wdf'^'fe^t <P^^s< '^3TRTH3Trt^ HRA, J |ant. \r tlie respondent, |3pears for the applicaat, |^mg document 011 record, pocument is takeu on record. respondent submits that the ^.ssign Uie seniority to fhe petitioner ^raiit conseqnential benefits by re- |from ftiis petitioii. Referrmg to tlie along wim application i.A, No, 1 <fied mat fhe cuiTent seniority list t>f tliis Court, has been filed as ^RT^k ^^r^"ll^ <1^1'<KIIN—FS/95—11/2008—1 ,00,000. T .^" ";^ ^ i! ^,^^. '; i ':''A:'1:1." y ?: ^\ ^. -. .^' /' *II*ICTI sn*iici» TroT "MI^Kt^, ^Tl1^41<o, [®|<rtH^< ^- P, f^o. l^o fo-^- '"^100 ^?I 'f^K (^3q^r) W^T ^T ^Jcfr ^IT^T^T w^s^ .t [ •?7 J1M ^wiW ^fta 'SH^T dni< Anuexure R-2 aiid iii tlie said sdni< fiiids place at Sr. No. 14 wher^as place at Sr. No. 16. He furtherl wim efiect from July, 1987 has ^iid an affidavit to this effect is in vie\v of Uie submissidn respoudent, me order passed b^ WlUl. The couteBipt proceediags| The contem.pt petition is issiqn ^niority list, tiie naine of fhe petitioner tlie naine of V.Y. Joglekar finds subniits that cous^quential benefits ^lready been graiited to the petitioner ^lso filed. made by leamed counsel for fhe this Court is substaiitially compUed a|c or»i^(<vi<fli'RR^ff"? f^^l <f^i^K ^^tRFTa^r are dropped. 'CQrdmgly disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^ira^r ^ET g$["n^r^R^wr—FS/95—i 1/2008—1,oo,ooo.