Crl.M. No. M-15374 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-15374 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.7.2009. ... Bant Singh and another ................ Petitioners vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. G.B.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab Sh. Arvind Mittal, Advocate for the complainant ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) As per allegation of the prosecution, Bant Singh and Gurpreet Singh – petitioners No. 1 and 2, have instigated the other co-accused to inflict injuries upon Kehar Singh, father of the complainant- Randhir Singh. Simranjit Singh and other 8 co-accused have taken away Kehar Singh forcibly in a jeep and have inflicted injures on his legs resulting in fracture on both the legs. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the accused have been falsely implicated. Crl.M. No. M-15374 of 2009 -2- In reply to the above submission, learned State counsel has submitted that Bant Singh is facing trial in another FIR bearing No. 133 dated 29.8.2008 under Sections 324/34 IPC, registered at P.S. Morinda, District Ropar. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides. The admitted rivalry is between both the parties. So far as, petitioner No.2 - Gurpreet Singh is concerned, he is nephew of Bant Singh. As per State counsel, he is not facing trial in any other case. So, his application for anticipatory bail stands accepted and the order dated 5.6.2009, qua petitioner No.2 – Gurpreet Singh is made absolute. So far as, petitioner No.1 – Bant Singh is concerned, I am of the considered view that he is not entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the bail application of petitioner No.1- Bant Singh stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 21.7.2009. Judge chugh