1 S/4 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12004/2010. Smt. Navajot Chhabra & Anr. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. .. Date of Order :: 23rd December 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Talat Bari, for the petitioners. Mr. B.K. Mehar, Government Counsel. Mr. D.S. Dev, for the respondent No.4. Ms. Navajot Chhabra, petitioner No.1 present-in-person. Mr. Deepak Kumar, petitioner No.2 present-in-person. Mr. Krishna Kumar Pareek, ASI, Police Station, Anupgarh. <><> BY THE COURT: This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners Navajot Chhabra and Deepak Kumar, aged 21 years and 28 years respectively, stating that they have contacted marriage with their freewill and consent at Arya Samaj, Pilibanga. However, according to the petitioners, the persons related with the petitioner No.1 are extending them threats and, therefore, a request has been made that the respondents authorities may be directed to provide appropriate police protection to them. Looking to the subject-matter, the learned Government Advocate Shri B.K. Mehar was requested to put in appearance and to take complete instructions. 2 Today, the learned counsel Mr. D.S. Dev has also appeared for the respondent No.4, the mother of the petitioner No.1. The learned Government Counsel Mr. Mehar has appeared with the Investigating Officer Mr. Krishna Kumar Pareek, A.S.I., Police Station, Anupgarh with the case diary of FIR No. 568/2010 that has been registered on the report made by the respondent No.4, the mother of the petitioner No.1. Both the petitioners are present in person and they have been identified by Mr. Talat Bari. The petitioner No.1 clearly states that she has contacted marriage with the petitioner No.2 of her own freewill and wants to live with him. The petitioners submit that there are some threats extended by the family members of the petitioner No.1. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the A.S.I. present-in-person in the Court today is directed to ensure safe passage of the petitioners to Anupgarh and to take the statements of the petitioner No.1 and so also ensure that her statements are recorded before the Judicial Magistrate concerned. The respondents shall further ensure that the statements of the petitioner No.1 are also recorded before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Anupgarh where the respondent No.4, the mother of the petitioner No.1 is said to have made an application for issuance of search warrant. 3 The respondents may proceed with the pending cases in accordance with law but so far the present petitioners are concerned, in the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, it does appear appropriate to observe that if any complaint is made by the petitioners, it shall be required of the respondents to provide them proper protection. The writ petition is allowed to extent indicated above. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. /Mohan/