IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-4521 of 2009 Date of Decision:18.1.2010 Gurpreet Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned State counsel does not dispute that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant states that in spite of joining the investigation by the petitioner, 100 grams of Gold is yet to be recovered from him. It is further stated that the value of the said Gold as on today is Rs.1,50,000/- out of which a draft of Rs.60,000/- has already been handed over to the complainant vide order dated 7.10.2009. In view of the above, order dated 17.2.2009 is confirmed subject to deposit of Rs.90,000/- within one month from today which shall be kept in the fix deposit and subsequently released to the party, who finally succeeds. 18.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE