IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 12198 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.09.2010 Dharminder Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Arun Gosain, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) As per the allegation in the FIR, accused Raman Kumar applied for housing loan on the basis of fictitious sale deed which was allegedly executed by Surinder Kaur in favour of Raman Kumar. On investigation, it came to light that some body else has impersonated in place of original Surinder Kaur as the photograph of the impersonator is not the same as the original Surinder Kaur. It is, therefore, apparent that the matter needs investigation and the concession of anticipatory bail may scuttle the same at this stage. The present petitioner identified the lady who impersonated as Surinder Kaur. No ground. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 27, 2010 mohan