.?:;^._ "^____-_^- C-22 sn^iqii h-U* SD^I shuich ^l^a + 'S^I "^iTiTRfif, dTfl.y'l'i. ^CIKHy 3"^r^¥.,. ^o vji.p. co No- ^"^ "m, 200 o *<r(R'IT (h*1iqi I^^ST' sn^i'roiiWHftg PETmONER VER$US RESPON&ENTS 1. CONd SIN6LE BENCH: HON-BLl 20.6.2008 Shri Parag Kotecha, Shri Satish ©upta,C| ©rievance of the issued an advertiament area by providing financi( purpose, they had introd|i Pariwar Mulak Yojna vide] cbl^'^'l +it^<?l1*'^ fe^ •(.f<ii'(^R ^T 3)P(n Sll^f Amit-3'aiswal, aged about 31 years Shri Vijay Jaiswal. ProprteTor Jai Stone Crusher, R/o Village Ramonujmgar, Distt. Surgujd The State of Chhatt-isgarh, throu 5ecretary, ©nxmudyogDepartmer t>KS Bhawon, Raipur 2. | Chhatt-isgarh adi and 6ramodh> Board, through its Chairman, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur 3. | Sarguja Kshetriya 6ramin Bank through its AAoaiager, Head Offic Vivek Complex, &gam 6ali, Ambil< Distt. Sarguja WRrr pErmoN UMI&ER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE .TETUTION OF IN&IA fe JUSTICE tSHIRENDRA MISHRA ^dvocate for the petitioner. |y. 6ovt. Advocate, for the State. [petitioner is that respondents-outhorities ror development of industries in the village assistance to the industries omd for that iced schemes - Margin Money Yojna and Annexure P-1. The petitioner adopted the l^ ^"T*''"^, ^.'^ '<t 1?»"'@^ '^s^f% ^,>-,JE "''^JSSg II-HC-22 sn^iqir 1^11?; SD^T A*1 ^f^t '3 t '»Hw<f,w\ww, hmvy, •mnfTWirai^.TCc5rto.3o^^ rsK'-------------^ 200 'lq^CT' SD^t ?^[RR'(rf??I prep^xred the Mcu-gin AAoney Yojna, respondents No. 2 and 3aft|ar re^»ondentsauthorities hav those schemes even after completed by -rtie petitio^er petitioner from •the reas\ petitioner under •the above Learned counsel for be disposed of with respondents by filing repres respondents and the same regutations of the re^iondei^ Accordingly, -this pe| petitioner to roise his grie^ance way of representation ond •t^ie No. 2 ond 3 as per rulejs accordance with taw expedi'(i <:bi''if''ffl>;r ^wvfi ^ i^S <Fa<^i< iTSlPgH 311^1 a project and applied for k»an tp l^ar completin^ the formalities. However, -the ^ not gnmted toan to the petitioner under |'he formalities required for loan have been and -they are also not apprising •the j>ns for not sonctioning -the loan to the jcheme. petitioner submits +hat this petition may to -the petitioner to approach the tentation agamst inaction on the part of the be decided in accordance with rules and hts. 1-ition is disposed of with liberty to the before the respondents No.2 and 3 by same Aatl be decided by the respondent |s and regulations of the respondents in iously. i Sd/- : ~ Dhirendra Mishra Judge libejrty n|iay [Tfr^ ^fo^f