IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6236 of 2009 DINESH YADAV @ DINESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Section 420 and other provisions of the Penal Code. It is submitted that in an accident caused by the petitioner his vehicle was seized. He has been enlarged on bail in the Police case lodged in pursuance of the accident. The allegations presently are of having presented fake insurance document for release of the vehicle from the Court. Counsel for the State submits that the Insurance Company to which the document was sent for verification has expressed doubt about the genuineness of the policy. The Insurance company by its letter dated 1.7.2008 has clarified that it can express a final opinion after fully enquiry into the matter. Let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Class Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Complaint Case No. 805 ‘C’ of 2008. If after the enquiry report is submitted by the Insurance Company to the Court where the release application is pending and - 2 - the Insurance Company does not stand by the genuineness of the Insurance certificate, the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist class before whom Complaint Case No. 805 ‘C’ of 2008 is pending shall be at liberty to cancel the anticipatory bail of the petitioner when he shall require to surrender and seek regular bail. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)