a yrimm mmwmmwmwwm mamL; wmxwmw ‘ x n my H Mm ,‘ W, mm HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Case (Civil) No.30412008 i CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT Appearance : Mr. Sunii Sahu, Counsel forthe petitioners. Mr. Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.K.Mishra, Counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER vi ~ (30.03.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. r Heard. The petitioners have tiled this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondents for the l ' alleged default in compliance of the order dated 29.09.2008 passed in W.P.(S) No.5460/2008. This Court while hearing the aforesaid writ petition “xx passed the following order on 29.09.2008 : t \ . PETIT10NERS 1 Santosh Kumar Sonwani, S/o Duj Ram Sonwani, Aged about 22 years, Occupation Gram Rojgar Sahayak R/o Village and Past Kapisda,Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Ku. Santoshi Chandra D/o Shri ‘Shiv Prasad Chandra, Aged about 20 years, Occupation Gram Rojgar Sahayak, R/o Village and Post Sanjay Gram, Tahsi! Champa, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.)V Versus RESPONDENTS O.P. Choudhari, Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Pramod Kumar ‘Harit, Chief Executive Officer, ~ Janpad Panchayat, Bamhnidih, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) m W “WMWQJAE W‘wmw WM I > Contempt Case (Civil) No.3n4I2008 “29.9.2008 'Mr. Awadh Triphthi, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate takes notice on behalf of respondent No.1 & 2 and prays for three weeks‘ time to File reply to the petition. Time, as prayed for, is allowed. One extra copy of petition along with annexures be supplied to learned counsel for the State. On petitioner’s taking necessary steps within seven days, issue notice to respondent No.3 & 4 as per rules. Heard on l.A., No.1, application for grant of interim relief. ‘ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were duly appointed as Gram Rozgar Sahayak vide order dated 29.08.2008 of 'Annexure P-3 by respondent No.4. However, after the petitioners have already joined their assignments vide Annexure P-5 & P~6, the respondent No.3 vide order dated 18.09.2008 of Annexure P—1 has cancelled the permission earlier granted for appointment of the petitioners herein. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, purely as an interim measure, it is directed that order dated 18.09.2008 of Annexure P-1 shall not be given effect to till the next date of hearing. ln view of above order, l.A. No.01 stands disposed of. List the matter after three weeks. ’Certined copy as per rules.” As stated supra, vide order dated 29.09.2008, it was directed that the order dated 18.09.2008 (Annexure P/1 in the writ petition) shall not be given effect to till the next date of hearing. However, on the next date of hearing i.e. on 10.12.2008, when the matter was called out, no one appeared on ' behatf of the petitioners, therefore, the matter was adiourned. On the subsequent date of hearing also i.e. on 26.10.2009, there is no direction for extension of the interim order passed on 29.09.2008 and it was never extended thereafter. it is stated at bar that the tenure of appointment for which the main writ petition has been med has already ended on 29.08.2009, as according to learned counsel for the \\ Contempt Case (Civil) No.30412008 I petitioners, the petitioners were given appointment for a period of 1 year vide order dated 29.08.2008. Since the tenure of the appointment has already elapsed and the order dated 29.09.2008 was not extended after 10.12.2008, I do not deem it appropriate to admit this petition for further hearing. 'Aocordingly, the Contempt Petition is dismissed summarily. Sdrh Sinai! Kumar Sinha Judge shyna