IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 381 of 2003 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- MUKTABEN W/O VINUBHAI HANSRAJ Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Criminal Application No. 381 of 2003 MS KRISHNA U MISHRA for Petitioner No. 1 MR RM PARMAR APP for Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH Date of decision: 05/05/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Rule. Mr. R.M. Parmar appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is preferred for releasing the petitioner on furlough leave. 2. This application was moved by the petitioner before the I.G. Prison on 27-5-2002 and the same has been rejected on the ground that the person whose name was given, was not ready to give surety in favour of the petitioner. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. as well as the material on record, this petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on furlough leave for a period of two weeks days from the date of actual release, on usual terms and conditions. The petitioner is directed to give name of a person for giving surety in favour of the petitioner and said person shall give surety in favour of the petitioner. Rule is made absolute. D.S. is permitted. (Kundan Singh, J.) /JVSatwara/