( 1 ) Cri.Apln4784-4728-4727-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4784 OF 2010 1. Nandlal Dalsing Chanwal 2. Subhash Harchand Machiye 3. Ashok Chattarsing Bhoplavad, R/o Wakdi, Tq. Jamner, District Jalgaon APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT .... Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, advocate for the applicants. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for the respondent/State. .... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4727 OF 2010 Chandrashekhar @ Shekhar s/o Padmakar Wani (Dehadray), R/o Wakadi, Tq. Jamner, District Jalgaon. APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT .... Mr. R.J. Nirmal, advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent/State. .... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4728 OF 2010 Dnyaneshwar s/o Jagannath Auoti, R/o Wakadi, Tq. Jamner, District Jalgaon. APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ( 2 ) Cri.Apln4784-4728-4727-10 .... Mr. R.J. Nirmal, advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent/State. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 9th December, 2010] PER COURT : 1. All the three (3) applications are being disposed of together. 2. Heard learned advocates for the parties and learned A.P.Ps. 3. It appears from the investigation papers that the incident dated 8th September, 2010 occurred on account of political rivalry, or dispute between the two (2) groups. It was outcome of earlier Village Panchayat election which took place on 22nd August, 2010. It appears that some of the allegations are exaggerated in both the F.I.Rs. The injury certificates show that Ranjit Pardeshi and Vishal Bhoplewar sustained minor injuries. 4. Considering the rival submissions and the record, I find that the arrest of the applicants is not essential for ( 3 ) Cri.Apln4784-4728-4727-10 the purpose of investigation. It would suffice if their presence with the I.O. is secured. The learned advocates for the parties submit that the applicants are ready and willing to abide by the conditions of asking the applicants to remain present before the I.O on each day till the investigation is completed. 5. Considering the reasons stated hereinabove, the applications are allowed. The applicants are directed to be released on bail on furnishing of the bail bonds in sum of Rs. 15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) each, before the Arresting Officer, in the event of their arrests, and on further condition that on each day, from ensuing Sunday onwards, they shall appear before the Investigating Officer between 5 p.m. and 8 p.m. and cooperate with the I.O. in the course of investigation, by producing any record or instrument as may be required during the investigation. The failure of either of the applicants to appear before the I.O. for three (3) consecutive days will entail recall of such liberty. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln4784-4727-4728-10 ( 4 ) Cri.Apln4784-4728-4727-10