IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl Misc. No. M-27556 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 09, 2011 Mamta Rani .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. J. P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Rewari is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application Annexure P-2, made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Rewari to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application Annexure P-2, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. September 09, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE