IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19413 of 2011 Bhikhari Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 08-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although the petitioner is named in the first information report but no specific overt act has been attributed against him. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation, one witness, namely, Jai Kishore claimed that the petitioner had gone with Sugandhi Yadav and also fired causing injury to one, Kamla Devi. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the aforesaid so-called injured, Kamla Devi was never examined by the doctor nor any injury report was produced in course of investigation. Learned counsel for the informant points out that after institution of this case, the informant received a threatening through mobile. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Bhikhari Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Shahpur (Bahoranpur) P.S. Case No. 20 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)