SINGLE 6ENCH 6F-(-^,)^- m THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^ /2006. -A PETITIONER Devashish De IMuzumdar S/o Late Shri. D.N.De Muzumdar Aged around 36 years, Unemployed. Residing at: Qr. No.MIG-316, i^.-^".^- NewBorsiSectorNo.2, ^/^? ^.^ .••'" ff ^•L.W /x>y / ^ %••• BHILAI - 490001 Tehsil and Dist.: Durg (CG). .^J:>' ^ ^" RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^:^:^ ..'^. Vf ^ -'-*..' "^ •'g ',r'^ -<B.A yi'xs. ..:'"n ^.A ^ 1. The Managing Du-ector (SAIL), Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). 2. The Deputy Manager, (Personnel-Recmitment) Bhilai Steel Plant, BfflLAI-490001 District: Durg (CG) ' ' • ^. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. NLANDAMUS ETC. r XI-HC-78 3n^rw R-ii<*> TOTSn^Tstitliiti '^ Soma +111WI ShHrai 'S^ •-VWW'tt, ff'rn'M'Ko, Rldiyy .\j^{\fyi.^T.tajf.... ^q- 2()0(' aTr^?rV^K (icl^'s"i.ff) OT3TW flfer 3TI^T cbi^F(<i<LnTi iTra^ff ^' fe^ <Ri-wi< ^isri^Tsn^r 30^-2W6 Heard Mr. B.P. Rao, counse|l for the petitioner. By the instant writ petition ijnder Artfcte 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that the the petitioner for compassionate a|3pointment on account of the retirement of the petitioner's mother on medfcal grouf The .case of the petitioner is in S-4 of Medical Department of ground the mother of the petitionei espondents t>e directed to consider the case of id. that his mother was employed as H.A. (Nursing) Bhilai Steel Plant. Subsequently, m medical • was deolared Permanent Medical Unfit for the job by the Medical Board of Bhil^i Steel Plant. Based on that, the petitioner's mother was discharged from sen/lc^ vide order dated 26-8-1997 and on that basis, the petitioner submitted a represe|ntation for compassionate appointment. Even after the lapse of 6-7 years, the re|spondents have not oonsidered the oase of the petitioner for oompassionate appoirltmert. l|itioner submitted that on similar ground number [compassionate appointment, whereas, the case l|ered. Therefore, the respondents be directed to Learned counsel for the pel| ofpereons have been appointed or( of the petltloner is not being oonsld| consider the representation of th4 petitioner and pass appropriate order in tl-e matter. Having heard leamed oouijisel for the petitioner and having perused the petition and the documents, the ptayer made by learned counsel is just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, respondenl) No.2 Is dlrected to scrutinize the representation submitted by the petitioner for com|3assionate appointment and pass final order on the application oonsidering the appointment, in accordanoe with th^ policy of respondent No.1. With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy ofthis order. oase of the petitioner for compassionate the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P.T.O.