IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 14TH AUGUST 2009 / 23RD SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 22612 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ UNNI.P.T., MURALIKA, KALARKODE, SANATHANAPURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA. (KUTTAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK) BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), ALAPPUZHA. 2. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), KUTTANAD, ALAPPUZHA. 3. KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.B.NO.85, KALA NIVAS, T.C.27/156,157, CHINMAYA LANE, KUNNUMPURAM, NEAR AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.RAMESH SRI.P.V.MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 22612 OF 2009 (V) ===================== Dated this the 14th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner retired as the Secretary of the Kuttamangalm Service Co-operative Bank on 31/1/2005. In this writ petition, what he complains of is regarding the delay in getting pensionary benefits that are due to him from the 3rd respondent. It is stated that the delay is for the reason that the 2nd respondent has not certified the correctness of the particulars in the pension docket with reference to the service details that are furnished in the pension docket itself. Petitioner states that the matter is still kept pending before the 2nd respondent and as a result of which the disbursement of pension is getting delayed. Taking into account the above submission, I dispose of this writ petition itself directing the 2nd respondent to verify the service particulars provided in Ext.P4 pension docket and if the same are found to be correct, give certification as required in Ext.P4. This shall be done, on the production of a copy of this judgment so that further delay regarding the claim of the petitioner for disbursement of his pension could be avoided. WPC 22612/09 :2 : Needless to say that once the pension docket duly certified is received, the 3rd respondent shall take necessary steps for disbursement of pension without any further delay. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp