IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 12TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27379 of 2010(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- GEEVARGHESE, S/O.DANIEL, KANNANKARA KIZHAKKETHIL, BIJU BHAVAN, PUTHUR MURI, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTS OF SURVEYS, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. JOSE MONY, S/O.JOHN, ERAMATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, CHUNKATHARA, PUTHOOR MURI, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK - 691 560. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.27379 of 2010 (V) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, seeking correction of a mistake in the re-survey measurement, he submitted Exts.P2 & P3 representations before the 2nd respondent. It is stated that despite long lapse of time, orders have not been passed thereon and therefore, this writ petition has been filed. Having regard to the pendency of Exts.P2 & P3, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall consider the application made by the petitioner and pass orders thereon, if these applications have been received and are pending before the 2nd respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg