IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8832 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Gita Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4. Respondent No.5 ex-parte. Ms. Kanta Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.C. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.6. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.6 to the post of Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Gania, Tehsil and District Shimla, H.P., for which the interview was held on 23.7.2002. The suitability of petitioner and respondent No.6 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has secured 19 marks and respondent No.6 has secured 20 marks. Since the suitability of both, i.e., petitioner and respondent No.6 has been 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the duly constituted Selection Committee. 2. Consequently, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck).