IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41536 of 2009 NAND KISHORE PRASAD @ NAND KISHORE SAO SON OF LATE BHATU SAO, R/O BADI SANGAT, P.S.- JEHANABAD, DISTRICT- JEHANABAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01/02/2010 Heard Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered against unknown under Sections 302/34, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant was sleeping with her husband. She saw bleeding from the neck of her husband. He was brought to hospital but he could not survive. She suspected that on account of property dispute he might have been killed by other family members. Submission is that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The informant has not seen the assailant. Petitioner’s name has come in the statement of two witnesses who have been examined under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. on 23.5.2009 in which they have suspected the role of the petitioner also. It is further submitted that had the petitioner participated then he should have been named in the FIR itself. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be 2 released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M./concerned Court, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 11 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)