IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30172 of 2011 1. Gulshan Pandey son of Vinod Pandey 2. Sintu Pandey son of Chotey Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 29.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant who appeared suo motu. The petitioners are named accused in this case besides other 4 persons with allegation of assaulting the prosecution side by iron rod on leg. Submission is that police after investigation submitted charge-sheet against four others for minor offences and exonerated these two petitioners. However, cognizance has been taken against all for the offences under which the case was instituted. There is counter version also and parties are litigating for long and series of cases are against each other. Considering the facts and circumstances, in the event of their arrest/ surrender before the Court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in connection with Angarghat P.S. Case No. 75 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the Court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever, is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Saif/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)