(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 6358 OF 2009 Eknath s/o. Damu Patil, Age : 41 years, Occupation : At present Nil, R/o. Indira Lalwani Nagar, Jamner, Taluka : Jamner, District : Jalgaon. .. Petitioner. versus Sabhapati / Sachiv, Krushi Utpanna Bazar Samiti, Jamner, Taluka : Jamner, District : Jalgaon. .. Respondent. .......................... Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V.Y. Patil, Advocate, for the respondent. .......................... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER 2009. (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 4th March 2009 passed by the learned Judge of the Labour Court, below Exhibit U-9 in Complaint (ULP) No. 39/2008, thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner, for interim relief, under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 29th June 2009, passed by the learned Member of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon, in Revision Application No. 22/2009, thereby dismissing the revision filed by the present petitioner. 2. Since the petition arises out of concurrent findings of fact and that too, in interlocutory proceedings, I am not inclined to entertain the same in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. 4. However, taking into consideration the facts of the case, the learned Judge of the Labour Court is directed to expedite hearing of Complaint (ULP) No. 39/2008, filed by the petitioner, and decide the same on its own merits, as far as possible within a period of six months from today. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE bgp/wp6358