IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WA.No. 1358 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19430/2010 Dated 07/07/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): / PETITIONER -------------- P.C. SANTHA, SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HANDICRAFTS APEX CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED (SURABHI), ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): / RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. STATE OF KRALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 6 95033. 3. KERALA STATE HANDICRAFTS APEX CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED (SURABHI) MANNANCHERIL BUILDING, KANNANTHODATH LANE, VALANJAMBALAM,ERNAKULAM - 682 016, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS FOR R3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. ---------------------------------- W.A. No.1358 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 1st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. The appellant, as a suspended employee, challenged her suspension in Writ Petition before the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge after calling for the inspection report found that if allegations made are proved, the same amount to misconduct warranting punishment. So much so, the learned Single Judge refused to interfere with the suspension. However, the petitioner in the Writ Petition is given freedom to apply for revocation of the suspension. 2. In the Writ Appeal, we have heard learned Government Pleader also. On going through the inspection report and the findings therein, we do not think the appellant's allegation, that she is victimised at the instance of the Union and she has not W.A.No.1358/2010 -2- committed any irregularity, is acceptable. However, we dispose of the Writ Appeal by directing the respondents to complete enquiry and take action, if any proposed, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This Writ Appeal is disposed of as above. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JUDGE) jg