c ^ . l otf IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. /2011 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 1. •^'/^^u •<^^/4>''' ^p^.7 ^/ Shobha Ram Sahu S/o Shri Latel Ram Sahu, aged about 52 years, Upper Division Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School, Ranigaon, (Middle Depot.) Block- Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through: - Secretary, Department ofEducation Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District -Bilaspur (C.G.) The Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Ranigaon, Block- Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A..---^ ^^y^ ']/vfi<^ ^-a^ HIGH COURT OE- CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR versus Shobha Raro. Sah' Stste ofC.G. &-, Others Shri Ajay Baril<;, cou'nsel &r tlie petltione SIrri Praveeii Das, Dy. G.A. for fhe Stete. lixe< With tiie consent offfe oarties, rjie m.atter is heaTd finallv. 'T'he petinoner was iaitiaBy appouited ss Deputy feacher 011 a pay ofRs. 150. After completion ofhis probation period, he wa.s regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300'. Lea.m.ed counsel for the petitioner subiaits that Ae above issue has been considered by the M.P. State AdiaiDistrative Tribuaal, Jabalpur .in O.A. No. 2745/89 'toetweeu Madiiiikailt' Yadu aiid. 56 others Vs. State of M.P. sad others, whereia it was lield fhat the similsrly sitiiated teache.rs are entitled to regulai' pay scale 'wit'h. effect froiEi the date of iiutial appointmeat. T'he tnatter was talcen up to the Hon'ble Supreiae Couil. The appeal was dis.niissed by the Hon'ble Supre.ine Court upholdiag tlie decisioa of the Triburial to the effect fhat the Teachers/Assistaii.t.Teachers are entit'ed 'to reglllerpay scale froai tte da.te of iTiitaal anpointment. It is further subaiitted that this •Court wliUe consideriag the sasie issue m W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006 ^between Avnar Scd Rmn. S. Others Vs. State of Chhatl.isgarh cind Others bv order dated 01.09.06 aUowed tiie pctitioncrs to naake a rEpn:sentaaoa wiSiio. a period often days, raisirig al! fhe grievances. Accordingly tls.e petitioner is grasited tiberty to make a represeutation raisi&g aU. his grievances iii the light of tlic aforesaid judgment aad thc circular dated 05.01.2011 {AiinexLire P/2), and m /£^'\ ff A _.,_ % vWf'St, (3 y/ ^h nun tlie coi'i.cera.ed respcndent is directed to decide fee represeatation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own inerits, v^itbin a period of eigllt weeks from. the date of receipt of fhe re-presentadon subiect to verification of tb.e facts. In view o'f t&e forego-ing, this petition is disposed. of. No order as to costs. Sd/- ! Pritinker Diwaker ,-^