..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2028 OF 2008 Mr.Shrikant Shyam Shivdasani and 2 others. ..Petitioners. Versus Dr.Divya Shrikant Shivdasani Nee Dr.Aruna Arjan Sadarangani and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Ganesh Gole, Adv. for the petitioners. Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. Dr.Divya Shrikant Shivdasani, Respondent No.1 in-person. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th December, 2008. DATED : 11th December, 2008. DATED : 11th December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners - orig.accused, the respondent No.1- orig.complainant who is appearing in-person and the learned APP for the State. 2. The respondent - wife has lodged C.R. No.19 of 2003 at Mahim police station, Mumbai against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 354, 387, 506(ii) read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. The said case is now numbered as C.C. No.302/P/2003 which is pending before the learned ..(2).. Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Bandra, Mumbai The said FIR came to be lodged on account of matrimonial disputes between the parties. 3. It is stated that in the matrimonial proceedings before the Family Court at Bandra, the parties have amicably settled the matter by filing consent terms. The respondent No.1 - orig. complainant who is appearing in-person has stated that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not wish to continue with the prosecution in C.R. No.19 of 2003 and the said C.R. may be quashed. 4. In view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C.277 2003(3) S.C.277 2003(3) S.C.277, the prayer of the petitioners can be considered. Hence, C.R.No.19 of 2003 of Mahim police station, and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)