IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1023 of 2008 MD. TABREZ ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.& ORS ----------- 05. 07.07.2009 The petitioner has prayed for an order for reinvestigation into Masaurhi P.S.Case no. 363 of 2006 under sections 279 and 304(A) IPC which was investigated by the Police and on completion of investigation, charge-sheet for the offences under sections 279 and 304(A) and 427 IPC has been submitted. Petitioner’s contention is that a charge-sheet for offence under section 302 IPC needs to be filed and for that re- investigation is necessary. In this case, FIR was lodged under sections 279 and 304(A) IPC. The contention of the petitioner could be considered only when he would have filed a protest petition against the investigation or he would have approached the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate for a prayer under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C for investigation and which remedy is available to him as alternative remedy. The learned Chief judicial Magistrate, on consideration of the facts and circumstances and also the evidence collect ed during investigation could decide the prayer of the petitioner. In view of alternative remedy already available to the petitioner, I find no need to entertain this application at this stage. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as such. Jay/ (C. M. Prasad,J. )