•r ^ e- HIGHCOURTOr^HH^mSGAMI^BILASPUR W.P.WNo.6009 ot 2007 PETITIOWBR RESPONDENTS 3. 4. Purushottam Patel, S/o. Late SIiri Chliabi Lal Patel, aged about : 45 years, R/o. ViUage : Ghueechuwaxi, Tahsil : Sakti, Distt. Janjgir - CIiainpa(C.G.) Vcrsus State of Chliattisgarh : Through : Secretary; Aadun Jati Tatba Anushuchit Jati Developnient Departmerit, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) TIie Coininissioner, Aadim Jati Tatha Anushucit Jati Developnient Departiaent, Raipur (C.G.) Assistaat Coirunissioner, Tribal Department, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) The Prmcipal, Govt. Higher Secondaiy SchQQl Tuman , BlocK : iKartala, Distt.rKorba (C. G.) WRTT PETITION UNDBR ARTICfcE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTIONOPINDIA Appearance: Shri P.K. Patel, Counselfor the petitioner. SIiri Sumit Vemia, Pahel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. . , . , • , . . : • ORALpRDBR (09.1Q.2007} SUNILKUBdAR SINHA, J " Heard. - . ; ' The petilioner, who is worMng on the ppst ofLecturer, has been traasferred by order dated 29.6.2007 froia Govt. HigUer Secondafy SGho0l, Tuman, District Korba to Govt. Higher Secpndary School, Barpali, Dtetrict Korba. Kearned counsel for the petitioner subiuits fhat tbere is n.0 Higher Secondaiy Schopl at Barpali, it has wrongly been mentiQiied in the order. Secondly, he aiyies fhat suice fhere is BQ pqst of Lecturer and fhe petitioner holds post of Leeturer, therefore, joiaiag ofthe petitioner caanot be taken ui fhe said School. He subiaits fhat iu this regard, a certificate ofPruicipal :l*?s^toggi;^Ste!(BiSI8BW?.as'M'®w'£ J-f f ;W.P.(S)No.o009 of2007 of Barpali, High Schbol has been ffled along wifh I.A. No.2. He also subtnits that in fhis regard, a nieiuo has been sent by the Assistant Coitunissiouer, Tribal Developinent, Korba to fhe Coimnissioner, Tribal Developnient, Raipur on 2.8.2Q07 (Aiuiexure-P/2). A perusal of the said nieino would show that in fact, fhere is no post of Lecturer iu Barpali School and for fhis, the Assistaat Coininissiouer has recoiuinended for caaceUation of the traasfer order. Leamed couiisel for the petitioner submits that eveu after sendiug of fhe said comniuxucatioa by the Assistant CQminissioner, no order has been passed tiU date. Haviag heard the leamed cbunsel for the petitioner as also the leam.ed counsel for Uie State, having gone through fhe contents ofthewritpetition, ia fhe opinion offhis Court, ends of justice would be selved, ifa direction is issued to the petitioner to file a fresh represeiitatiou along wifh copy ofthis order aad copy of fhis writ petition before fhe concemed aufhority aad fhe conceraed authority is directed tp dispose of fhe same at the earliest. . Consequenfly, this petitton is disposed ofwith a direction fhat if so advised, the pefitioner m.ay file a representation along with copy of fhis order aad copy of writ petition before fhe concei'ned authority and if such a representation is filed, the concemed aufhorily shdll dispose ofthe same at the earliest, so fhat, the controversy raised by the petitioner inay be set at r^t for ever. With the above observation, this petitioii staads fiiially disposed of. SunilKBmar Sinha Judge vatti