1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3193 OF 2010 1 Shri Bapuso Bhiva Patil & ors. .... Petitioners vs Shri Dagdu Krishna Patil(Kamble) .... Respondent Mr. A.M. Adagule for the petitioners. None for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 16th April, 2010 P.C.: 1 The petitioners/employer has challenged the order of grant of amendment in favour of the respondent/employee in a Compensation Petition under the Workman's Compensation Act. There is a dispute about the date of cause of action/accident. By this amendment, the court has permitted the employee to correct the same. The petitioners/employer are disputing the various aspects including this date also. 2 Considering the reasoning given, I see there is no reason now at this stage to interfere with the same as ultimately, it is necessary to give opportunity to both the parties, basically when parties need to substantiate their own case based upon their respective pleadings. If that is so, the order so passed need no interference. 3 However, it is made clear that the petitioners are entitled to raise all appropriate pleas or defences as are available under the law, including of 2 limitation. The Court to consider the same accordingly. 4 In the result, the Petition is dismissed with the above observation. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)