IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR (cg .) l gimme-gawk . M.c.c. No. 5/ /2005 LLN SECOND APPEAL NO. 64/2001) JRF§PONDENTS ’ X“ 1 Hariram,sonofMayaram, aged about 35 years esudent of Village Konari, Tah. Baloda Bazar, Distt Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through : Collector, Raipur (CG) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND APPEAL NO , /64[200 The Appellants/Plaintiffs, named above, most humbly and respectfully submits as under:- /' APPELLANTS ‘ /1. Bhago Bai Wd/o. Latelu Sahu PLAINTIFFs aged about 40 years, 2 Blha Bal Wife of Peersan Latel (i ‘Sahu aged about 21 years E, Pusaiya Bai (Minor),aged about i \Q-Jy {fi’v’g ‘ 18 years, aged about 16years, ‘ : 9 KH3\& [Q‘{: . 4; Gouri Bai, aged (y .d No. 3 and 4 are minors through their natural guardian mother kgé “9: Bhagobai Wife of Latelu Sahu. All are resident of Kauhrod, as ,af; Q'é‘g Tah. Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS WW \ m...€Q:.Q-C—No- 5 W I /:<O 200 of ENWW WWI $Ww€w Eshri SK Guha, counsei for the appncams. Heard on MCP N6. :55 deiay in fiiing the MCC~ For ihé reasons staied in We appiica‘cion, ii is aiioww. 1dOHe€i This is an appiicatian 07 re NG. 64i‘2‘3u1. case. waa ii$ted or; zU-H- , 2530"} ,' but sinceShri Aiak Aradhz, Advocate has no? shi‘iiea here, iiqeiafere iiie appeiiaw‘i coLid not be reprewn'tea and the case was dismissed ior non-p suffer because of couiisei, ihe appiication is aiiowed. The Sesond Appeai Ne. Maw? is /‘ resioree' i0 its originai number. fizuua for cmdonation 0? The deiay in fi'iing the appea: is co s‘toz‘aficn of $etsond .Appea! Caumei submits that the $ince iiie party shouid not GSeCU‘iiOn. Sdl- f akhruddin i Judge New F