C.W.P. No.1802 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.1802 of 2009 Date of Decision: 11.01.2010 Mohan Parshad .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents 2. C.W.P. No.1803 of 2009 Ranbir Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5. Mr. Anand Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ` -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The orders in challenge before this Court are termination issued to the petitioners, who were similarly placed and who were working in Dwarka Cooperative Supply Marketing cum Processing Society, Bhiwani. The termination was effected on the basis that employment had been offered under a Scheme, C.W.P. No.1802 of 2009 -2- which was operated with the funds provided by the Director Rural Development, Department and since the projects had been over, they could not be continued in service. Even at the time when the order was issued by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani as a Chairman of District Supply and Marketing Society, the services of the respective petitioners were regularized only on temporary basis. No specific Recruitment Rules or Regulations are shown before me to support the contention that the petitioners have any security of tenure. If there is any statutory violation or if the contentions of the petitioner were that the services could not be terminated except by complying with any statutory provisions, the petitioners shall have remedy elsewhere in an appropriate Labour Court and it cannot be challenged through a writ of certiorari. 2. The writ petitions are dismissed with a liberty to the petitioners to challenge the termination, if they advised, before a competent authority-Labour Court by seeking an industrial adjudication through the reference of the Government. 3. The writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 11, 2010 Pankaj*