HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6114 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner submitted a representation, dated 24.02.2011, before the Municipal Corporation of Eluru, the first respondent, alleging that the third respondent is making construction in his immediate neighbourhood without obtaining any permission. His grievance is that the first respondent has not taken any steps. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the second respondent and learned counsel for the third respondent. The third respondent filed a counter-affidavit stating that she has been accorded permission by the Municipal Corporation of Eluru, the first respondent on 22.12.2010 and that the construction is being made strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plain. The petitioner is under impression that the third respondent is making construction without any sanctioned plan. The third respondent has enclosed a copy of the proceedings, dated 22.12.2010, through which she was accorded permission to construct the ground, first and second floors. Therefore, the very assumption of the petitioner is untenable. All the same, the first respondent should ensure that the construction being made by the third respondent is strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the first respondent shall ensure that the third respondent makes construction strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY 14th March 2011 dr