1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4163 OF 2007 (Rajendra Sadashiv Lanje and another .v. Jt.Charity Commissioner and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri M.M. Sudame, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri S.Y. Deopujari, AGP for the respondent No.1. Shri S.K. Borkar, Advocate for the respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 05TH MARCH, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By way of present petition, the petitioners challenge the order passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur dated 16th August, 2007, thereby appointing the respondent No.4 as a Member on the ad hoc Committee appointed to manage the affairs of the Secondary Education Society, Sakoli. Shri M.M. Sudame, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that while appointing the respondent No.4 as Trustee, the authority has not considered the judgment of this Court in the case of Ramkrushna-Appa s/o Vishweshwar-Appa and others .v. Krushna s/o Udaybhanji Ingale and others (2005(3) Mh.L.J., 729). 2 However, upon perusal of the order passed by the authority impugned herein, it was noticed that since there was no name suggested by contesting parties unanimously, the authority had appointed a person who was suggested by the general body. In that view of the matter, this Court directed the learned Counsel to place on record the resolution passed by the General Body of the said Society unanimously. Copy of the said resolution is placed on record along with the pursis filed by the learned AGP. The perusal of the resolution would reveal that the name of the respondent No.4 is suggested by the general body. In that view of the matter, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The petition stands rejected as such. JUDGE *rrg.