Petlti©ners Respondents Plaintlff COURT OF AT Wrlt Petition No.STtS of 2005 Aniruddh Nath Singh Di'ed and dsletsd 1. Av/desh Kymsr Slngh S/o Late Aniruddh age. ab.39 yrs. 2. Kuntl Bai VV/o late Antruddh, age. Ab. 60 yrs. Both resj of Amgaon Tah. Lundra DJst.Surguja 3. Rukhmani W/o Saiik Singh D/o Lste Aniruddh age.ab.46 yrs. R/o Pratapgarh. Radhapur, T§h. SeeSapur, DIstt.Surguja 4. Chandan Slngh W/o Loknath D/o Late Aniruddh age.ab.43 yrs. R/o Mukhdega. Tah.LalSunga DJstt.RaEgarh Versus 1: Bharat Agaria S/o-Mana, Aged about 35 years, R/o yiSiage-Amgaon Tahsii-Lundra Distt-Surguja (C.G.) 2. State of C.G.Through Collector Surgujs (C.G.) (Writ Petltion underArtlcle 227 ofthe Constitution of indla) Mrs.Hamlda Ssddique, counsel forthe petltloners. Mr.Arun Shukte, counse! forrespondent No.1. Ivlr.Vinod TeRam, Panei Lawyer for respondent No.2/State. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sliarma, J.) ORDERCORAU (2-8-2011) 1. By this petition under Artlcie 227 of the Constitution of india the pstltloners have cnaiienged the iegality and propriety of the order dated 27.9.2005 by ths 4th Civsj judge Ciass-li, Amblkapur, in CMS Sult iMo.27A/05, whereby the Court bslow has declded the issue rsgarding jurisdlctlon of /ourt as negative and has hsld that sult Is maintalnable. clvll Coi "%^\ ^ ."''""^ -t il^ '^.ll:.^:-^^"'^ ^- 2. After some arguments, Searned counsel for the petltioners sesks to wlthdraw this wrlt petltion Vv'ith iibertyto. approa.ch before the revlsJonaE Court. 3; Aasordingiy, the v/rit petltion Is dismissed as y/ithdrawn wlth the aforesaid liberty. Certlfied copy of the order Impugned be returned to the counsei for the pstitioners after furnishjng duiy photostat copy ofthe same. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge (^.