IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITON N0. ^^57 2004. PETITIONERS:- :-1) Av£ /y ^y ^ .<•> <•' / Ai<e':v-' K" RainBhan Tiwari, S/o- Shn Prahalad Prasad Tiwari, Aged about 29 years. Constable No. 534 R/o- Police line Karlee Distt- Dantewada Dantewada (C.G.) Ramlal Yadav, S/o- Late Ram - khUawan Yadav, Aged about 45 years Head Constable no. 07, R/o- Police Station Kistaram Distt- Dantewada Dantewada (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS:- •^^ . ' i<^ ^%s& .^"^vG^ ^ 1) Union oflndia Through- Secretary, PubUc grievances and Govt. oflndia. 2) State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Department of Home(Police) Raipur(C.G.) 3) State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: Secretaiy, Departement o Hoine (Police) Bhopal(M.P.) 4) Inspector General ot Piolice, Bstear Range, Jagdalpur(G.G.) ^...-'..c',c^;.^f^ (2) 5) Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur(C.G.) 6) Superintendent of Police Dantewada, Distt- Dantewada (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICUB 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION < mDIA. i._L T'ff STR^ gifp d ) "4iAii(ri<^, E?tf!y'is, 3n^is^T(^i3^T) ^PifeplNtV^ ^ TftZT TfsKy STSfR'qsi'^T Shri Vinod Lai Chandam,| Advocate for tliepetitioners. Shri Vinod Shrivastava, Q.A-, forthe State ofChhattisgarh. Application for urgent he4ring is allowed. Counsel for the petitionek submitted tiiat in similar matter bearim W.P. No. 578/04, orders have b^en passed. He prays that similar order may be passed inthis case also. Prayer is not opposed by 1jiis other side. Having considered the f4;ts and oircumstances ofthe case, material on record and in view of 'the jlidgment cited above and further the legal positiori, the action of tlie State) Authorities m not relieving tlie petitioners cannot be sustained and the petit|oners are entitled for relieving. Accordingly, the petitionjis allowed. The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners within 15 days from the date ofproduction ofcopy of this order. Consequently, M.W.P. NJ3. 2018/2004 stands disposed o& Certified copy as per rule^. Sd/- Fakhruddin 1 Judge ^5