IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6075 of 2010 KUNDAN KUMAR, Son of Bindeshwari Mandal, resident of Village-Piprahi, P.S. Gamahariya, District-Madhepura. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10-03-2010 Heard Mr. Kamal Kumar Sinha,,learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. K.P.Dubey, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Complaint Case No.524 of 2007 for the offences under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and under section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner while pressing the bail petition submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.9.2009 and the petitioner is ready to co-operate during the trial if he is granted bail. Learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and while referring second page of the impugned order he submits that the conduct of the petitioner shows that even he has got no respect for the orders of this Court.He was granted anticipatory bail with a condition that he will take steps - 2 - regarding re-conciliation. Anticipatory bail was granted for a period of one month. Even after expiry of one month, neither this petitioner took any step for re-conciliation nor he appeared before the court. Subsequently after issuance of warrant of arrest the petitioner was arrested. Learned counsel for the complainant also submits that the petitioner was arrested while he was going to solemnize his second marriage. In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J)