/ 1/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.757 OF 2007 Sureshlal Fulchand Doshi ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Machindra Deshmukh i/b. Milind Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mr.Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : 5th May, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Petitioner is challenging the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dated 12/08/2003 whereby his application for return of the property was dismissed. Impugned order discloses that the application was dismissed mainly on the ground that the Petitioner and his advocate remained absent. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that no specific ground has been taken in the petition, giving explanation why Petitioner and his advocate remained absent when the matter was called out. Submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner across the bar that due to personal difficulty neither the Petitioner nor his advocate remained present on that day, is accepted. Impugned order is set aside. Matter is remanded to the Sessions Court. Petitioner shall remain present / 2/ before the Sessions Court on 9th June, 2008. Application to be disposed of by the Sessions Court on merit and in accordance with law. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. ( V.M. KANADE, J. )