-:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6331/1997. Surendra Singh & Others. VERSUS State of Raj. & Ors. 06.11.2006. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Ripudaman Singh, for the petitioners. Mr.Ajeet Bhandari, for the respondents. ***** Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that in the matter acquisition proceedings have already been completed and the award has been passed way back in the year 1999. It is also submitted that the petitioners No.5, 6 and 7 who submitted before the respondents that they may be allotted land in lieu of compensation and the land was allotted to them in pursuance of their application. In view of the above, I do not find any good ground to interfere in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In case the petitioners No.1 to 4 are also desirous of taking the similar relief from the respondents, they may approach the respondents by means of the application and the respondents shall consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law. In case the petitioners No.1 to 4 are not satisfied with the award passed, they would be free to challenge the same or seek enhancement in accordance with law. The time spent in the pendency of the writ petition may be condoned on making an application before the appropriate forum. -:2:- The writ petition as well as the stay application stand disposed of, as above. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.