C. Review No. 54 of 2007 24.9.2008 Present: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for the respondents. The learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of memorandum dated 24.9.2008 whereby the disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against Mr. Manmohan Singh Parmar, Executive Engineer. The respondents are directed to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a period of six months positively. The learned Additional Advocate General has also placed before the Court for its perusal, copy of letter dated 19.9.2008 whereby the State has agreed to get the matter re-enquired from the office of the State Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau, H.P. The copy of letter dated 19.9.2008 is permitted to be taken on record. Consequently, the Additional Director General of Police is directed to entrust the inquiry to the Superintendent of Police (Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau), Shimla. The Superintendent of Police (Vigilance & Anti Corruption Bureau) shall conclude the inquiry afresh within a period of one month from today. It is clarified by way of abandoned precaution that if after the conclusion of fresh inquiry any person is found guilty, the necessary consequence would follow including registration of F.I.R. It was only at the instance of the petitioner that the illegalities committed by the functionaries of the State surfaced. He deserves special appreciation for the efforts made by him. The petitioner can be termed as a ‘whistle blower’. The society needs the persons like the petitioner to take cudgels against the unscrupulous persons. It was only at his instance that an inquiry was got conducted by this Court from the Vigilance. One person has already been put under suspension and the departmental proceedings have been initiated against him. The role of the State is appreciated only to the extent that it has agreed to get the other issues re-enquired as per the previous order dated 9.9.2008. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the review petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. September 24, 2008. (cr)