IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18346 of 2010 YAMUNA RAJWAR, S/o Lakhan Rajbanshi. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act. By order dated 29.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 1451 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail with observation to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Now the charge has been framed on 09.04.2010 vide Annexure-3. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 163 of 1999 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit 2 giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father/wife of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)