Before the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur (MJJ wp ¥ 5$23a’ /98. ¢ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constituticn of India for issuance of a writ of Certiorari and mandams and any other Writ. directioh or oder: getitioneg Sukh singh 8/0 late Mohanlal Sahu. Security Guard, personnel No.—45687. H.S.C.L. Bhilai, Rp- Village—Ram“. (joba). Postr- Deokar, Tahsil— Saja. Distt.— burg (M.P.): :V ersa s: ggsponaents; 1. General Manager,H1ndustan $tee1 1 Works Construction ltd. Bhilai. Duct. mtg (M.P. ) . 2. Industrial Court of M.P. Raipur Bench. Krishna Sedan. HIG- 16. Shankar ”agar: Poo o 'Raipure f3. L$0ur cOurt: PcOo Burg ‘MOPO) The petitioner begs to submit as under :— ?articulare of the petitioner: As given in cause tit]. a. contd. 2/--- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 5530 of 1998 Petitioner Sukh Singh Vcfsus Respondents General Manager & ofhers SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justica Satish K. Agnihotri, J Smt, Mcra Jayaswai, Advocatc for the pciitioncr. Shn' H. B. Agarwal, Senior Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. O R D E R ( Passefi on this 19m day of Febmm‘y‘, 2007) The followmg arder of the Court is passed by Satish K. wihotri, J. 1. The petitioner while working as Security Guard was transferred from Bhilaj to Neyveli { Madras) on the same terms and conditions vide impugned..transfer order dated 13.4.1993 (Annexure A] 3). Tins Court vide order dated 11.12.1998 declined to grant interim relief. 3. It is well settted principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular otticer/employee be posted keeping in View public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this ..\ Court can interfere only in the case of proved malafide, non.- competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. . Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has become infmctuous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. The respondents aie at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View the public interest and administrative exrgency. In View of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. OL i ‘ Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .