IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8812 of 2009 RAJENDRA MANDAL Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. B.P. Pandey, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.C. Giri, Adv. For the State : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 4/ 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Shortage of articles from the establishment of Khadi Gramo Udyog is taken as misappropriation, which is replied by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the shop was being attacked. F.I.R. was lodged, threatening of accused persons was also informed and lastly, petitioner proceeded on long leave finding one of his associates transferred and another suspended. His further submission is that one Baban Bihari Singh entrusted for the safety of establishment which never can exonerate the petitioner from the liability. If lock could have been broken then liability would go upon Baban Bihar Singh, which was found intact and lock was opened and inventory was prepared. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)