TSKSSSlWasiKKSaSWSi.aS'ESW - &3?it£.t;i£iai'&""'<, ' , ^•iW^S-:^'" ~ ' /"! L-^> IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR s;.»u®8^.-'<-**« M.C.C. No. 6 of 2010 APPLICANT (OutofW.P.No.2618 pf 2001 J M/s. Shakti Construction, a Partnership Firm, duly registered under the Partnership Act, 1932 ^vs' ^f^MX PETITIONI ?i«tft^St' under the Partnership Act, 1932 ..%1M5?^ having office at Santrabadi, «i-i8""'^'^S^i Station Road, Durg (C.G.) ^*. . ^^-^l • ^ ^y »«<' NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS ^^T^ '"^*~»^^ Versus :1) Municipal Corporation, Bhilai constituted under Section 9 of M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, having office at Supela, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) :2) Superintendent of Police, Special Establishment (Lokayukt) Durg, District Durg (C.G) :3) Deputy Superintendent of Police, LokayLikt, Raipur (C.G) :4) Assistant Engineer, C.S.P.D.C.L. Supela, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) 490 023 APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIQN OF W.P.No.2618of2001 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT PETITIONER M.C.C. No.605 of2010 Ms. Shakti Construction. VERSUS NON-^PLICANTS : Mumcipal Corporation, Bhilai & RESPONDENTS " APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. N0. 2618 OF 2001 Present: Smt. Meera Jaisvi'al, Advocate for the applicant. Shi-i Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawv'er for the State. :tb-j (Passsd on 11'" day of November, 2010) 1. Leanied counsel appeariiig for the applicaiit submits that the eounsel for the applicant could not appeai' on account of bonaficle mistaks, fherefore, Writ Petition No. 2618/2001, wfaich. was dismissed on 05.10.2010 may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufllcient cause has been shown. Writ Petitioa No. 2618/2001 is restored to the original file. 3. A copy of this order be p.1aced on record of Ihe original writ petition and the same bs listed for hearmg. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit .