IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1464 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20791/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.M.JOHN, S/O.MATHEW, AGED 53 YEARS, KURUVINGATTU KUZHIYIL HOUSE, NEDUMPURA VILLAGE AND P.O.,THALAPPILLY TALUK,TRICHUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM SRI.BIJU K.ELIAS SRI.JEFF JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- E.J.POLY,EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS DIVISION, PWD OFFICE, CHEMBUKAVU, TRICHUR-680020 GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case(C) No. 1464 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th day of January, 2011. J U D G M E N T This contempt case is filed by the petitioner in the writ petition complaining of non-compliance with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. In that judgment, I directed the respondent to take appropriate action to redress the grievance of the petitioner raised in Ext. P1 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. An affidavit has been filed the respondent, wherein, it is specifically stated that the whole situation is because of the conduct of the petitioner himself. Although the petitioner sought time to file a reply affidavit on 15.12.2010, no reply has been filed. Today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation for the the petitioner. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.