swam BEW 'c Mw/J’f x E HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N01204:»: 2005 Dr. Aditya Prasad Tiwar‘I, son of late Shri Bhagwati Prasad Tiwari, aged about 69 years. resident of Danteshwari Marg, Near New Colony, KushaIpUr, Raipur (C.G.) VERSus State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Departmentof Higher Education, D.K.S. Building, s Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G‘.) Commissioners, Department of Higher Education. (Non Govemment , Educational Institution) (Pension Cell) Science v College Compound, RaipUr (C.G.) Director, Directorate ofHigherEducatidn, Raipur(c.e.) PETITIONER PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 3W,?fim§,f§amg{ 3® u uu.u. n n mw '2%% i: am < u ..-nuuunnnu... n“mun..u.. WWW WW QEWW Shri Samc‘r B€ha e u Shri Akhil Agra aancg opy. Heard. Leanmd Couns petitiner is a retirecl P1 S.N.G,l CoHeg Mng petitioer rther slim fixation f reviseipay Vth y i a peion d gratuit w pti ma rp setO xus/3 6 W4 b a en arned couns the petition makes mitedpraye hat or resent et n may be. disposed ofith iieetion. o a ea in al y th rd br th o i n he ce h 7 ) unsel or the petitions , co f } al, a11€1 awyar for t Stat€ on for petitioner sumi‘hat te feeor. e has etired or} 31. .97 from C.Cr.). Learned counse f0? the s hat the petitioner s eed for ale on the basis of comntion of thereafte e eitled o fixation of rrrs tc. H alo uts tha‘it the the btst h \s H r 1 i ( } it t i ntitl : remeda i r h is nt fr h aea e e s sbmi etioner‘has de e natins vide Amlere—P 8 ut no action hs be Le el f r er a li-r t f the p pi 'o w a d t tile tresh reprsent o ong with cop of is oer efoe 'e cncerned author ad t oncernd autority may be directed t ecid e ithin stipulated perio grante y this ourt. C his lid pe n s a l T imte ray is ot oppoe by the Stte counse. The prayer seems to be reasonable and it is allowe. .\.—3 “un”. Wnunnn W§w 31.03.£005 “ dv c d o 1 e ué n fu ; o d S( pa commiSson m L P L he ns an y i o de th s' ‘erw d d b d , WW m mmw ‘ WM§WW E2 ., > %31f?man%¥r ' ‘Consequsntly, if so advised, the, petitioner may file afresh V k ‘represantation within a perod. of one month fmm today along with copy [of writ petition and copy of this order before the competent authority and i? such representation, is filed, the loompetent authom'ty shall clispoée of the same as early as _\' possible preferably within a period of 3 months from the date o£ receipt of representation by reasoned order on each and every point raised 'by the petirimer. The copy of order shall be communicated to the peritoner by the authonty concerned With the aforesaid observatrons the petmon stands finally disposed of. fr h ,r/‘XA ‘ Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha . l Certiiied copy as per rules. (9%W)