IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 672 OF 2008 SHRI. DEMU P. VERNEKAR ... Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND S.D.O. TISWADI AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No. 1,2,3 & 5. Coram:- A. P. DESHPANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 15th November, 2008 P.C.: In view of the order that we propose to pass we do not deem it necessary to issue notice to respondent no.6. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer in the petition by seeking a direction against respondent no.1 for deciding a representation dated 28/02/2007, a copy of which is filed on page 21 of the petition. The learned Counsel appearing for respondents no. 1, who is seized of the representation submits that the matter is now fixed for evidence on 27/11/2008. He further assures that a decision would be given by the respondent no.1 within a period of 3 months from today. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application before respondent no.1 seeking intervention in the proceedings. In view of this statement, nothing survives in the Writ Petition and the same is disposed of. A. P. DESHPANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH