Court No. 2 Civil Writ Petition No. 1163(M/S) of 2002 Smt. Asha Shah and others ........................ Petitioners. Vs. Prescribed Authority/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital and others. ........................ Respondents ............................................. Hon'ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Sharad Sharma as well as Sri P.C. Bisht, learned counsel for the respondents Nos. 2 & 3 and learned Standing Counsel. Since the appeal has been decided by the appellate court in terms of the compromise entered between the parties before him, now it is not open for the petitioners to back out. So far as controversy between the parties is concerned, that has come to an end. Learned counsel for the parties informed that there is condition in terms of compromise for renovation of the building and it is to be done according to the provisions of Special Lake Area Development Authorities Act, 1986. Renovation of a building obviously is to be done in accordance with the provisions contained in Special Lake Area Development Authorities Act, 1986. The Prescribed Authority shall see that the appellate order is enforced in letter and spirit. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of finally. (P.C. Verma, J.) 05.03.2003 P.Singh