HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.592 of 2001 JUDGMENT: This revision is directed against the order dated 20.07.2000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sathupalli, in Crl.M.P.No.1115 of 2000 in P.O.R.No.27/OR/98-99 refusing to receive charge sheet. 2. The brief facts of the case are that after completion of investigation in P.O.R.No.27/OR/98-99 registered against the respondents herein, the Forest Section Officer, Sathupalli, filed charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sathupalli, on 07.04.1999. The Office of the said Court returned the charge sheet with certain objections on 21.04.2009. Complying the objections, the Forest Section Officer, Sathupalli, re- presented the charge sheet on 25.04.2000 with a petition in Crl.M.P.No.1115 of 2000 to condone the delay of one year twenty days as the delay occurred due to misplacement of the record. The learned Magistrate dismissed the said petition by an order dated 20.07.2000. The same is questioned in this revision. 3. Heard the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. 4. Having perused the record, this Court is of the view that there are no valid grounds to condone the abnormal delay in re-presenting the charge sheet. In my considered view, the Court below is justified in returning the charge sheet. Further, the alleged offence took place in the year 1999 i.e. about 11 years back. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the revision, at this length of time. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. ______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 8th July, 2010. CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.592 of 2001 (Dismissed) 8th July, 2010 CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 592 of 2001 DATE:08.07.2010 Between: State, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. … Petitioner and Peddam Raghavulu and others … Respondents