IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 1 EILASPUR w.P.Na. ’9 < /2oox‘ ’ PETITIONER 3 Krishna Kumar, Arvind Kumar through Krishna Kumar Agrawal, aged about 42 years,resident'of MANNNMMMH arm Ambik apur , C hhatt is garh . VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 . Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspun , Chhattis garh. Dinesh Kumar Agrawal,son of mprakash Agrawal,resident of Main ro ad, Lakhanpur, district Sarguja, ehhattisgarh. NrnMwm»V m; MF MN ¢ Nr, ” , HF F ’ wNm M F PETITION QNDER ARTICLE 226 -/ 227 9F 111E CONSTE- TUTION GF INDIA mMMMMNWMMMFhhM” .._.<.H m »m, XI-HC-22 WW, Chnattisg‘ayh, B ilas pur ‘ w.P. mums/2001‘ ‘ . ..... . ..... >.‘i 199 §/2/2oo1 Heara Mr. Prashant mshrai learned counsel for the petitioner and shri' N.K.- Snikla, learoed Dy.A.G-. for respondent no . l—State. The matter is séid to be pending bfare STAT at Walior. {It appears that the petitiuxier has already approached the said 'Authority for disposal Iqf. the/petition. . It is stEted‘ti'iat mueh delay has beentaused in the aisposal of the tnatter, It ;s heped that ,the said huthor‘ity shall expedite disposal of the matter. At this stage, it appears that this Court need nottggssue any specific direction. \r r . . V . . ‘ with the above obs er? ation, this tetition is disposed ‘V fof . J i sd/_ i ‘ Chief Justice ;