IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO : 21980 of 2008 Between: Ragam Shivkumar Yadav, S/o. late Augamaiah, R/o. H.No. 4-1-49, Kowkoor, Hakimpet, Malkajgiri Mandal, Secunderabad - 500 078. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Joint Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet, Medak District. 4 The Tahsildar/M.R.O., Warangal Mandal, Medak District. 5 Dr. B. Vidya Sagar Rao, S/o. Ramarao, R/o. Cheriyal Village and Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not suspending the order of the 3rd respondent passed under reference No. D/4086(4056)/07 dated 28-08- 2008 during the pendency of the Revision No. F3/50/ROR/08 before him, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the 2nd respondent to pass an appropriate interim order suspending the order of the 3rd respondent passed in D.No. 4086(4056)/07 dated 28-08-2008. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking to issue a writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent-Joint Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy, in not suspending the order of the third respondent-Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Siddipet, Medak District, pending revision ﬁled by the petitioner against the order of the third respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the second respondent has now passed orders rejecting the stay petition ﬁled by the petitioner pending disposal of the revision. Inasmuch as this writ petition is ﬁled only against non-granting of stay pending the revision and since it is now stated that the stay petition is rejected by the second respondent, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J Date:06.10.2008 sj/nrg ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy.. 2 The Joint Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 The Revenue Divisional Offcier, Siddipet, Medak District. 4. The Tahsildar/MRO, Wargal Mandal, Medak District. 5. 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Building, Hyderabad. (OUT) 6. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}