IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11901 of 2011 ANIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 341, 325, 354, 504, and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the accused persons to have made assault and specifically alleged against these petitioners to have taken gold chain of the informant’s wife. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that both sides have serious land disputes and nothing has been recovered from the petitioner. Moreover, the accusation, except under section 379 of the I.P.C. are bailable and the other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 8181 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the - 2 - petitioner namely, Anil Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Atari P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)