IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 22558 of 2006 Between: 1 Ch. Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Somanatham, Thorrur Mandal, Warnagal District. 2 P. Bhaskar, S/o. Ramachandram, Thorrur Mandal, Warnagal District. 3 P. Maneswara Rao, S/o. Baraiah, Thorrur Mandal, Warnagal District. 4 S. Venkateswarlu, S/o. Lachaiah, Thorrur Mandal, Warnagal District. 5 O. Venkataiah, S/o.Laxmaiah, Thorrur Mandal, Warnagal District. 6 L. Ram Reddy, Narsimhulpet (M), Warangal District. 7 B. narsimha Reddy, S/o. Ramchandra Reddy, Zaffargadh (M), Warangal District. 8 S. Marudwathi, D/o. Purushotham, Duggondi (M), Warnagal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Project Director DPEP/SSA, O/o. Commissioner & Director of School education, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The District Educational Officer,-cum-Project Coordinator- DPEP/SSA, Warangal District, Warangal. 3 The Addl. Project Coordinator DPEP/SSA, Warnagal District at Warangal. 4 The Mandal Educational Officer, Duggondi (M), Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the common orders in O.A.No.5975 & 8164/2005 dt. 18.09.2006 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal as illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and contrary to the Scheme (SSA) and consequently set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO :22558 of 2006 ORDER: (Per the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) On 24.4.2008, when this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent and the matter has been posted to today under the caption of dismissal. Today also, in spite of the matter being posted under the caption of dismissal, the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned G.P. that the matter is squarely covered by the Judgment of this Court passed in W.P.No:20705 of 2006. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ___________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice G. Chandraiah Dated:25.4.2008 Gurc/nn THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO :22558 of 2006 (Division Bench Order delivered by Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) 25/04/2008 ,