IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1448 OF 2005 Mrs.Uma Chakaravarti. ...Petitioner . Versus. State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. Shri R.M.Jayakar i/by M/s.M.V.Jayakar & Co.for the Petitioner. Ms.Rajashree Gohavi A.P.P. for the Respondents 1 & 2. Ms.M.V.Deshmukh with Mr.Vikram Pai and Mr.B.R.Pai for the Respondent No.3. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED : 13th May, 2005. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. The learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.3. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.3 states that the Petitioner and the Respondent No.3 are residing in the same flat and the minor child is residing with them in the said flat and there is no move to keep the child in the Remand Home. 3. In view of the statement it is obvious that the Respondent No.2 cannot send the child to the Remand Home. 4. For the reasons stated above, there is no need to : 2 : entertain the writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. 5. It is made clear that I have not made any adjudication on the merits of the allegations made by the Petitioner against the Respondent No.3. 6. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of the order. Judge.