1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 4403 OF 2011 (Sachin Yogesh Talwar and anr. VS. The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. P.P. Khandagale Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. Anil Kasliwal (Jain), Advocate for respondent no.7 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 26.08.2011 P.C.:- 1. The Petition involves disputed question of fact. It appears that there is a dispute between members of the family over the right to the license. 2. Such a disputed question of fact cannot be adjudicated in the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]