IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1111 of 2008(Y) ---------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SURESH, SON OF KRISHNAN, KILIYA VALAPIL VEEDU, KUNNAPALLI P.O., PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SRI. U.K. DEVIDAS. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ R.P.No.1111 OF 2008 in W.P.(C)No. 26873 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 ORDER This review petition is filed by the State pointing out a mistake in my judgment dated, 4.9.2008 in W.P.(C) No.26873/2008. In the order impugned in the writ petition, the District Collector imposed a fine of Rs.10,000/- on the petitioner and a direction to pay an amount of Rs.30,000/- towards value of the vehicle. I had quashed the direction to pay fine and sustained the direction to pay the value of the vehicle. By mistake, figures were interchanged. This requires to be corrected. Accordingly, paragraph No.3 would stand modified as follows: “Following the said judgment, I quash the direction in Ext.P2 order directing the petitioner to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-. R.P.No.1111/2008 &W.P.(C)No.26873/08 2 However, the petitioner shall pay the amount of Rs.30,000/- demanded as amount in lieu of confiscation of the vehicle, as per Ext.P2”. The review petition is allowed and the judgment in the writ petition would stand modified as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd R.P.No.1111/2008 &W.P.(C)No.26873/08 3