IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3352 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 17, 2011 Chander Mohini … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another … Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of seniority and promotion. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondent authority to consider this aspect of the matter. Petitioner submits that she would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. 2. The respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light of the decision referred to above within 2 a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment referred to above and a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the respondent. 3. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 17, 2011 (PK/Jai)