1 prod-10-wp-7610-7611-2011.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srj WRIT PETITION NO.7610 OF 2011 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7611 OF 2011 Smt. Nisha Sagar .. Petitioner V/s. Rakesh B. Gandhi & Another .. Respondents. Mr. Shardul Singh with Mr. U. P. Amin i/b. B. Amin & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. S.A. Sawant i/b. Shantilal & Co., for Respondents. CORAM : G.S.GODBOLE, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2 The papers are produced and request for stay of the impugned order dated 8th September, 2011 was made. The learned Advocates was, therefore, requested to address the Court on merit. The learned Advocate appears for the Original Plaintiff is also heard. 3 All that has been done by the impugned orders is appointment 2 prod-10-wp-7610-7611-2011.sxw of the Court Commissioner to inspect the suit premises. Suit for eviction is filed on various grounds including ground of unauthorized addition and alteration. In my opinion, this order is purely interlocutory order and has been passed in the aid of the final relief which has been prayed for in the suit. It is not in dispute that the Plaintiff had requested for inspection which is the right of the Plaintiff under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and said inspection was not given. 4 No interference whatsoever is called for. Hence rejected. (G.S.GODBOLE, J.)