IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.253/2011 PAPARAO GANPATRAO DESHMUKH ..VS.. ABDUL RAFIQUE MOHD. SALAUDDIN Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. J.J. Chandurkar, advocate for the appellant Mr.A.S. Kilor, advocate for respondent CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : 23.09.2011. Heard Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law: 1] Whether the lower appellate court committed an error in rejecting the registered document of sale deed exhibit 30 and the other documents on record in the absence of cogent and satisfactory evidence? 2] Whether the lower appellate court committed an error in considering the irrelevant circumstances as suspicious circumstances, shrouding the registered document of sale deed and thus whether the lower appellate court applied perverse approach in the matter? Mr. Kilor, counsel for respondent waives notice on behalf of respondent. CIVIL APPLICAITON CAS NO.820/2011. Heard. Prima facie, the appellant /plaintiff is the owner of Survey no.590 for 1.21 hectare out of 7.95 hectare of Mouja Chandol, of district Buldhana under the sale deed, there is no reason why the appellant should not be allowed to continue in possession or occupy the area purchased by him. Hence injunction in terms of prayer clause (1) of the application is granted. JUDGE SMP