IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3556 of 2011 Date of decision: 20.05.2011 Satya Prakash Sharma …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …. Respondents Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J.(Oral): The petitioner who is Senior Assistant is aggrieved by Annexure P1 the impugned transfer order. The main ground of the petitioner is that he has only less than two years service to retire from service. But the fact remains that the petitioner has been working in the office of S.D.M., Rampur, for the last more than four years. In case, there is any other convenient and suitable vacancy available, the petitioner may point out the same before the second respondent in which case the second respondent will consider the same and take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. In case, the petitioner is relieved in the meanwhile, it will be open to him to avail leave of kind due till orders are passed as above. 2 2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja ), May 20, 2011 Judge (BSS/Jai)