CWP No. 2914 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 2914 of 2011 Date of decision: 07.07.2011 Surjit Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigami Limited and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. K L Arora, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) The only grievance raised in the petition is that the respondents are not counting the work charge service toward regular service for grant of pensionary benefit to the petitioners. It is not disputed before me that the issue raised in the petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered in CWP No. 4763 of 2006 titled as Ranbir Singh versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others, decided on 26.02.2008. This judgment was subsequently upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and copy thereof is CWP No. 2914 of 2011 2 annexed with the petition as Annexure P-7. The respondent/Board, however, says that the service records of the petitioners are required to be verified. The present writ petition is disposed of in terms of order, Annexure P-8. The Board would be at liberty to verify the service records of the petitioners. Let the needful be done within a period of two months from today. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 07.07.2011 mohan