.^^^r 'c^ ^-••'^ ^ plftS^ AaWd ....^^^3 ^\^^ -£i^f9 ^-'s^''IA" ^-•-•" c ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P^,NO.U^../...../2009 PETITIONERS 1 - Sangeet Rao S/o Shri Naraseya, age about 56. year, R/o Qr.No. 14-C, Street No. Avenueue -C, Sector-7, Bhilai Nagar, Dist. Durg (C.G.). VERSUS 1 - The Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai. Tah. & Distt. Durg (C.G.) The Dy. General Manager (E.T.L.) Bhilai Steel Plant Bhilai, Distt.-Durg (C.G.). 3- 'UnionofIndia^ Steel Authority oflndia Ltd., Through-Chairman, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^1 <sp ^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BJLASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.6927 OF 2009 PETmONER Sangeet Rao Versus RESPONDENTS The IVIanaging Director, Bhliai Steei Plant & Others OWrit Petitlon under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of Sndia) Slngle Bench : Hon'bfe Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J, Present > Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. QRDER,(^Ay. (Passed c?n thTs 5 day ofMay. 2010) By this petitlon, the petitioner seeking a relief of grant of salary, which has been stopDed on account of certain ioan advances. it invoives disputed question of facts with regard to advancement of loan, Interest accrued thereon and adjustment with salary^ There is no complain of Involvement of question of iaw or infringement of iegaf or any other-right of the E?etitioner. 2) In vlew of foregoing,'the writ petjtion is dismissed. However, Siberty is reserved to the petitio'ner to take recourse to competent Civil Court, if so advlsed, as per the provisiorss prescrlbed underthe law. Sd/- . , Gowri SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge