IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2007 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1929 SA.No. 616 of 1993(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13/11/1992 IN OS 424/82 PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, NEDUMANGAD IN AS.332/1987 of IIIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM . .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT/(PLAINTIFF) ------------------ KASIMKUNJU MUSALIYAR ARIFA BEEVI, PUTHUVAL PUTHEN VEEDU, PALLICHAVEETU MURI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, FROM ROADARIKATHU VEEDU CHARUMMOODU, PUTHUKULANGARA MURI, UZHAMALACKAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI HARUN-AL-RASHID, T I ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENTS: APPELLANTS/ (DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2) ---------------------- 1. KASIMKUNJU MUSALIYAR ABDUL RAHUMAN, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, CHARUMMOODU, PUTHUKULANGARA MURI, UZHAMALACKAL VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK. 2. KASIMKUNJU MUSALIYAR SALAHUDEEN, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, CHARUMMOODU, PUTHUKULANGARA MURI, UZHAMALACKAL VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI G .S . RAGHUNATH, M RAMASWAMY- R1 & 2 THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23 /05 / 2007 , ALONG WITH SA NO. 652 OF 1993 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. ------------------------------------------ S.A .NO. 616 & 652 OF 1993 ------------------------------------------ Dated 23rd May 2007 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel appearing for appellant submitted that in spite of registered notice sent and served, appellants did not give any instructions and therefore learned counsel is compelled to report no instructions. Appellant called. Absent. Appeals dismissed for default. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj. ============================= M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. JUDGMENT S.A.Nos.616 & 652 OF 1993 23rd May 2007 ============================