1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.586/2004. : : Bharat Mal Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : : Date of Order 25.8.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Prahlad Singh for the petitioner. Mr.B.L.Awasthi, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the State. The grievance has been raised by the petitioner that his application for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III has illegally been not considered and action of the respondents in not considering his case for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III in spite of the fact that the respondents decided to give appointment to Siksha Sahyogis who were earlier appointed on temporary basis should be held to be illegal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Government vide its order dated 7.11.2001 granted relaxation giving directions to the concerning officers that those who have earlier given their services as Teacher Grade- III/Siksha Sahyogi on contract basis, should be given one 2 more chance of service and if they fail to acquire the qualification of BSTC/B.Ed. within three years from the date of their appointment, their services shall not be regularized and they are not allowed to continue. The respondents in reply to the writ petition have stated that the respondents vide order dated 30.9.2000 provided that the candidates who fulfill the requisite qualification, terms and conditions for the appointment and pass the bridge would be eligible for appointment. As per order issued by the State Government, those who were worked as Siksha Sahyogis were required to submit application till 31.1.2003. The petitioner however, submitted his application on 26.6.2003. Hence, his case could not be considered. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is a resident of rural area he could not come to know of this notice and, therefore, the respondents be directed to at least consider his case by relaxing the requirement of submitting application within time limit fixed. If that be so, it is upto the respondents to grant relaxation. On fact, however, no case is made out of mandamus for directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner. Petitioner may however make representation to 3 the respondents for grant of relaxation. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.40.