- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1410 /2003 Nagorao Purbhaji Pawar & six others. ...Applicants.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & another. ...Respondents... ..... Shri Amol Gandhi, Advocate h/f Shri P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel for applicants. Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, APP for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2, though served, is absent. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE: 26.07.2010 PER COURT: - 2 - 1] By this application, the applicants take exception to the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, dated 9.7.2003, cancelling the bail granted to the present applicants for a period of 15 days. It appears that the applicants had obtained bail on 30.5.2003 for an offence punishable u/s.147, 148, 149, 427, 436 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial Court cancelled the bail as it was brought to the notice of the trial Court that the applicants had threatened the prosecution witnesses. The applicants had filed the present application in this Court and this Court granted stay to the order of the Sessions Court on 6.8.2003. 2] In the light of the stay, which had been operating for the last nearly seven years, both the learned counsel for the parties state that the object of filing the present application has been achieved as the trial itself may have been disposed of by the trial Court. Since stay has been operating for nearly seven years, according to me, further relief, which the applicants have prayed for in this application, has been rendered infructuous on account of passage of time. In that light of the matter, therefore, this criminal application is dismissed with no order as to costs. (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/cr26710