:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1618 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.R.V.Bansode h.f Smt.Samidha Dongre, Adv. for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 18TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Considering the fact that the Application made, did not even point out as to how Section 48(1) of the land Acquisition Act, 1894 could have been invoked. Secondly, an order of 7.4.1983 of the Collector being relied but the acquisition proceedings commencing in 1985 culminating in an Award, so also, taking of possession and handing over to persons who are entitled to the same, the Commissioner is right :2: :2: :2: in refusing to oblige the petitioner and re-open the acquisition proceedings, which are already concluded. There is no case made out for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, with this order of the Commissioner which subserves public interest and also the object and purpose of the Resettlement Act. Petition dismissed. No costs. ********