IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14712 of 2008 SHANTI DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners are father and mother of one Santosh Shahi, who is alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant with an intent to marry, though a minor of about 16- 17 years of age. Based on the information given by the father of the victim girl Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 178 of 2007 for offences under Section 363 and 366A of the I.P.C. came to be lodged. It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. of the girl does not assign any role or action in facilitating the crime against these two petitioners. He does not deny that there could be an occasion for emotional and irrational action on behalf their progeny, but that should not itself be a ground to deny privilege of bail to these two petitioners. In view of the above submissions, which are borne out from the evidence on record, let the petitioners, namely, Shanti Devi and Raghubansh Shahi, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur 2 P.S. Case No.178 of 2007,subject to conditions under Section 438(II) of the Cr.P.C. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)