IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 13.5.2009. S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.41/2009 RSRTC & Another Vs. Jagdish Pooniya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri R.P. Singh } Shri J.K. Singhi}, for the petitioner. This revision petition has been listed from defect side as barred by limitation of 250 days. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed for condonation of delay and it has been submitted that the delay occurred on account of time consumed in the formalities for taking a decision to file the revision petition. Suffice it to say that the contents of para 2 of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act are not sufficient to make out a case for sufficient cause in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Para 2 reads as follows: “That the decision to file special revision has been taken and that has taken some time in the official formalities.” A look at the contents of the application in my view are absolutely vague and therefore the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act deserves to be dismissed. The application is accordingly dismissed. The revision petition and the stay application are accordingly also dismissed as barred by limitation. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS