HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.4937 of 2007 ORDER: Petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.166 of 2006 dated 02.07.2007 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. On a complaint dated 13.08.2004 given by the petitioner, a case has been registered against the respondents 1 to 7 in Crime No.120 of 2004 for the offence punishable under Section 448 of I.P.C. by the Station House Officer, Madannapet Police Station. After investigation, the S.H.O., Madannapet P.S. filed a final report, on 18.02.2005, under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. before the VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, referring the case as of civil nature. The said final report was submitted after giving a notice dated 28.02.2005 in Form No.96 to the petitioner-complainant, which was served on the petitioner-complainant on 18.8.2006. Since the petitioner-complainant did not file any objection petition, the VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, by order dated 25.08.2006, accepted the final report submitted by the police and closed the proceedings. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.5622 of 2006 in SR.No.5422 of 2006 in Crime No.120 of 2004 seeking to reject the final report and also to take cognizance of the case after condoning the delay. However, the learned VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderaabd, by order dated 10.10.2006, refused to entertain the said petition. Questioning the said order, the petitioner filed Crl.R.P.No.166 of 2006 and the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, by order dated 02.07.2007, dismissed the said revision petition. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner-complainant. Apparently, the trial Court accepted the final report submitted by the police and closed the proceedings vide its order dated 25.08.2006. The petitioner-complainant did not challenge the said order and therefore, the said order has become final. This Court is of the considered view that if the petitioner has any grievance against the order of the trial Court dated 25.08.2006, he should approach either this Court or Sessions Court, but not by way of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., and Section 5 of Limitation Act or under Section 397 Cr.P.C. I find no merit in this petition. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 14.06.2010 Gsn.