IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12181 of 2009 1. GAURISHANKAR BHATTACHARYA @ SHANKAR BHATTACHARYA 2. REKHA BHATTACHARYA --- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that some allegations are made in the complaint petition. Thereafter a divorce case also filed on behalf of complainant but making contradictory statement as in the complaint petition the act of other family members was more serious than the husband while in the divorce case she has stated that she resided to her matrimonial house for two days only with her husband, thereafter to her parental house. Further submission is that the demand is also not constant. Earlier it was for the cash of Rs. 10,000/- along with fridge and colour T.V. Later it was either half of the share of her father or rupees two lacs. According to learned counsel, she is not adamant to reside with her husband and prayed for divorce also but only to pressurize all the family members have been - 2 - made accused casting different contradictory allegations even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No. 559 of 2008, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI