HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Q No. 5398 of 2007 Oo+;+; Aivind Dubey, S/o Late Amamath Uubcy, Agcd about 38 ycara, K/o Ramaaujganj, District Surguja titioner Versus Respoadents l. State of ChIiattisgaA, Thiough : Sccrctary, Nagariya I'rashasan, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CQ) 2. Magar Pancliayat, Kamaniijganj, Through : Chief Municipal OfGcer, Nagar Panchayat, Ramaaujgary, District Surguja (CG) 3. Sub-Divisional Ofiicer (Revenue), Rainaaujgaaj, Distt. Suiyjja (CGj 4. CoUector, Surguja, District Siirguja {C.U.) WRIT PBTXTION UNDER ARTICLE 326 OF THE CONSTITU'nON OF INDIA SB: Hon'fclc Stiri Satisb K. Affl.ibotsl. J yiin Manoj Faranjpe, Advcreate tor ttie petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate C^eneral for the respondents l, 3 and 4. ¥- ORDE R ( PsssRd on this 7& day ofSeptemhRr, 2007) the 1. Learaed counsel appeai-ing for the petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to press any other prayer, except fhe prayer No. 7. l. 2. Learned counsel appeariag for the respondents/Slate submits that the prayer No. 7.1 of the petitioner to fhe extent that he shall not be disposisessed from fbe caateen shade No.2, Nagar Panchayat, Rainanujganj, ft)rcibly or by extra judicial metliod, without fonowmg the pnovisions of law, caanot be opposed on the -2- simple ground that if aay dispossession is caiTied out withoul following the due process ofknv, the same shaU be iBegal. 3. In view of the foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. The respoudents No. 2 aiid 3 are diiected not to dispossess the petitioner iiom the canteen shade No.2 Nagar Paiichayat, Ramanujgaiij, forcibly or by extra judicial method, without following the provisions oflff^. , _ Sd/- Thakur SatishK.Agnihotri Judge E^