IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15651 of 2011 DEEPAK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 365, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. In the F.I.R. specific accusation was against Satish Thakur who alleged to have forcibly married the informant’s son with his daughter. The name of the petitioner sprang up in 164 Cr. P. C. statement of the victim boy to the effect that he went with a girl Rakhi on a motor cycle, on way he met with Rani when he left Rakhi and again met with Rakhi thereafter it is alleged that this petitioner and others took him on motor cycle where forcibly marriage was performed with Rani daughter of Satish Thakur. The 164 Cr. P. C. statement of the victim boy reflects that before he is being taken to house of Satish Thakur he was met with the girl Rani which not only clouds the 2 statement of victim boy but the entire accusations, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 334 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)