IN IHE HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (G.G.) sg'?!teH.. "ss ^' "'s^ ?-l'^^^-i;;l; ;-i^:-3^i; W.P. N0. ;~f CS 6 /2 002, PETITIONER VS. KESPONDBNTS Suresh Kumar Singh s/o Shri D.P.Singh aged about 30 years Project Officer posted at Bistrict Janjgir-Champa, R/o Sarkanda Bilaspur (C.O.) 1. State of S.G. through .s'f"rA\yA Commissioner/Special Secre-bary ^©%^^.^'v'*' Qovt. of C.O. Department of Women '^ *• ^"'z^?- •>' c^~ .•^0-'^" ^•x'";^"is1^- &•<••• arsd Gbild Ogvelopment D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (c.G.). 2. Dy. Director (Es-tb) department of Woinen and child developmen-fc Kaipur. 3. Oollector, Distt. Janjgir-Ghanpa (C.G.) 4. District ProQramme Officer Departmen't of Women and child developraent Distt. Janjgir-Champa, C23 5. Chief Executive Officer. Jila-Panchayat, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (G.G.). PETIT3:ON_UN3:>ER ARTIGLE 226/227 OF CONS'TITOTION OF INDIA. 1!' XH1C-22 •sa^rw ji ' ^itt?> ^i^a ^^ SW^ tfl^^! a •K.' A«i-<l<<jlW^'8BSw<s,:&w-tai,<. lw<?wa)*Hth^M^..^^.M^/2^^ ^.^.^..^^.^...^..^^^ '®re^' ^^t %«IPU<,^i^a 03/03/2003 Shri Ravish Verma.coui3.se ShriSaiijayK.Agarwal, Dy Heard, for £hepetitiorier. •» B..G. for the State. 2DOI The grievance offhe writ p< his salary Jbr fhe period June, salaty for fhe earfier period, ac< siace been paid. ^ It is the case ofthe petitioi^r all alone aad attending his offieid a wrong assuiuption tliat hc was .das pay salaiy to him. It is the furt|icr though nuniberiof^ representatic|Eis attention is beiitg paid fo fhejn, prejudiced for il0n-psjyinent of sajary. Cdnsidermjg ten limited petitioner at the time of hearui^ that no usefiil guipose would be: wnt petitipn as it cari be disposejJ <Wqt<t'EH'i*UW11 ^ TS%T^^^^^ ^&^FtpK^fl ;titioner is to non-payment of to December, 2001. fhe ordiug to fhe petitioner has that thougU he was present duties, respondentno.3, on not present on duty, did not case of the petitioncr that have been subnutted, n6 ith the result that he is being ^tith na1|i.ire of grievaaGe raised toy ffle the Couit is of 1ihe opuiiQn served inteeping peading pie of at the adimssion Stagel l>y »ia s ^: •^ai ! 3a-HC-22 "3^'"eiiann«i^^wB»'»e,US<<'fWI^. *it*i<'«taiNi«n ^i^ T-"-^ ; , iaii^rw i 'iil^* ^B§?I ;|^*WfT'H%0 K'" herefii aa appropnate curecupn TQ xtie W fhe inatter. Accordiilgly, fhis writ directuig the respondent no.3 petUfoner'g represeatation by 31st fhe petitmner aa opportainity consequences are to: foUow. In irievaiice thereafter, he shall appropriate forum.. With the afor^Said observatij petitiou is disposed of. tt>l<rfiW^5JW^^'^^ ^R$R PT<*itl^-fl iOUdtiUluu.3 lu Lu4uu''c iuto- petition ism. disposed ofby ^- • . to take a decisioll-on fhe |\ilarch, 2003 after giviag to rf hearfng and thereaftpj ;ase the petitioner has any be free to approach the ns auddirections, fhiswrit Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge -ai !I^Sl PH