1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2010 Rahul Uttam Yewale & Ors. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.V.V. Purwant for the Applicants. Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for the State. Ms.Pratibha Borade for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : MAY 3, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 has filed affidavit of respondent no.2 who is present in Court. Respondent no.2 in his affidavit has stated that he was under an impression that the present applicants are employees of the main accused, however, after having come to know that the applicants are similarly situated as the complainant, he has no objection if the FIR against 2 the present applicants is quashed. 2 I have mentioned the facts of this case in my order dated 5th April, 2010. After having stated the facts, I have also mentioned that the applicants, prima facie, do not appear to be the employees of the original accused. The facts mentioned in the said order are treated to be incorporated in this order. In view of the affidavit in reply filed by the respondent, therefore, Criminal Application filed by the applicants is allowed. 3 The FIR dated 24th November, 2009 lodged by respondent no.2 which is registered vide C.R.No.206 of 2009 at the Vijapur Naka Police Station, Solapur, is quashed qua the applicants only. 4 Application is allowed and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)