‘6 IN THL H1cH CCLhT O KPNATAKt AT 3NALORE bated this the 18th day of March 1998 1E HONbL1 . JUTICE v.P. hOrN KbMR EV1TI1ION NO.7992—94/1998 Between: 1. iudu1ee, W/o.G,Hussa n ab, JuLnm3 Masjid Stret Bellary. 2. S.Njranjan 0 S/o.S .Pompanna, Jumma Masjic3. btreet Bellary 3, Sathyanarayana Kakani /o,rinarayana Kcikarii Flower traet, Bellary. . . .PcTTINiR (By ha1iri Pati v. for r1 ,V.iKatgeri, dv.) Ard; 1 Deputy Comriission€r of Conrercii Taxes (Assesmerts) Be1lar. 2. Chi f Jucici1 Maoistrte, FiLst Cia s1 B€iiry (y 2nt,.-ujat, CI-, lois rit I-etiticn is filed under Articles 22b and 227 ci toe Constitutrcn ci India with a prayer to direct te rd to dispo’e ci t c a ph— e2e cations tiled b the petitioners vioe Jsnnexure t, £1, and £2 dt.21.1.1998, 22.1.1998 and 23.1.1998 respectively. This Writ Petition ccnina on fir Prelimina Hearing this day, the Court mpde the following: The petitioners can.1ains that though petitioners are not dic partners of MIS. AadhaKrishna Trading Company, baL ui Colony, àellary, still, treatin,j traan as partners, steps nave been taken to recover the aues. the petitiGners submit that they hove made an alication in t’as behalf befc.re the first respondent on 22.1.1996 vide Anrn.xure k, £1. and £2. The. grievance C.’ It petitioners i that the 5o 1 0 a rlirotor a S Ft t &etn disjosed ol till toay. 2. 1 have heard aut.ujatho, 1 arned Govtrmrent Pleaaer. Wit out osnj mt the details of tie submission, I feel it will setve the ends of justice at I direct the first rest ondent to examine ant pats appro priate orders on Annexure—E, 1.1 and £2 filed \ètbr/ ii “I I. o C) • ,‘la * t I ng I i’t 0 ‘Co ‘Cl It 0 t P. 0 0 ag 0 2 Ph