»i (^ 1 -'> ,^^y •^--" IN THE WRIT PETITION fS) N0. 'S OAf OF 2011 BETWEEN 1. Ajay S/o Kistiori, aged about 27 years, by caste- Oumar, Occupation-Labourer R/o Village-Charcha Colony, Bandhpur Stop Colony Charcha Distt. Korea (C.G.). initial date of appointment 26.04.2007. ^l. Mukesh Kumar, S/o Late Shri Videsfii, aged about 27 years, Occupation-Labourer, R/o BTC Colony, Ward No. 14 Charcha, Distt. Korea (C.G.). initial date of appointment 09.10.08. 3. Suresh Kumar S/o Late Shri Videshi, aged about 31 years, Occupation-Labourer, R/o BTC Colony, Ward No. 14 Charcha, Distt. Korea (C.G.). initial date of appointment 30.04.2007. 5l^^y@j.The State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Prmciple ' / . £&^^ Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ^ll,-^ ^y 2. The Under Secretary, Government of ChhattiSgarh, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). PETITIONERS AJLD 3. The Joint Director, Urban Administration and Development, Raipur (CG). 4. The Munidpai Council, Shivpur Charcha, District Korea ^hrough its Chief Municipsl Officer. Municipal Councit, Shivpur Gharcha, &Istrict Korea (CG). t iii ^ ^5. The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Shivpur Charcha, District Korea (CG). RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THECONSITITUTION OF^INDIA E3 [pt y c^ 25 Priya HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. JustJce Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No. 3061 of 2011 Petitioner Ajay and others VERSUS Respondent State of Chhattisgarh and Otbers Present: Shrl Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioners. Smt Smita Ghai, PL for theState. ORDER (13^7.2011) At the outset, Shri Tripathi submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petitioh with libertyto file the revision before the competent authority in view of the order passed by this Court (Annexure P-4) dated 1 0.02.2011. He further submits that a direction be issuec( to the competent authority todecide the ease in the light of the order passed by this Court and also varibus circulars issued bythe State. 2. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. 3. In the eventuality of filing of any such revision, it is expected from the competent authority to decide the same in accordanee with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge < * '(;