IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1703 of 2011 1. RAM BABU ROY SON OF RAJ NANDAN ROY 2. RAJ NANDAN ROY SON OF LATE PALAMU ROY, BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF MUKSUDPUR, P.S. MINAPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR …. PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.1.2011 Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the petitioners be kept on the record. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 29.11.2010 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No.886 of 2008, by which the trial court has rejected an application u/s.228 Cr.P.C. The Counsel for the petitioners submits that initially the case was instituted u/s.302/34 I.P.C., but subsequently there were materials during investigation which warranted submission of charge sheet u/s.306 I.P.C. but the same was not done nor has charge been framed in the said section alternatively. Since it is the demand of the petitioner to frame an alternative charge u/s.306 I.P.C., I would direct the trial court to consider framing of charge alternatively also u/s.306 I.P.C. to meet the ends of justice. With these observations, the application is allowed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J.)