IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2775 of 2010 1. Mahesh Kumar Sharma son of Late Satya Naayan Sharma, posted as Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur, resident of Flat No.4/C,Shreekunj Apartment, Bose Park, M.G.Road, District Bhagalpur. 2. Ved Prakash Sah son of Late Shrinivas Sah, posted as Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur, resident of Nayatola, Gumati No.1, Bhkhanpur, District Bhagalpur. 3.Ram Chandra Mishra son of Late Hari Nandan Mishra, posted as Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur, Resident of Quarter No.0/2, Bhagalpur College of Engineering Campus, P.O. + P.S.Sabour District Bhagalpur. 4.Manikant Mandal son of Late Basudeo Mandal, posted as Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur, Resident of Quarter No.0/3 Bhagalpur College of Engineering Campus, P.O. + P.S.Sabour District Bhagalpur. 5.Krishnanandan Prasad son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad Singh, posted as Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur, resident of Quarter No.0/6 Bhagalpur College of Engineering Campus, P.O. + P.S.Sabour District Bhagalpur. 6.Dhirendra Prasad Kumar son of Late Basudeo Kumar posted as Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur, resident of Quarter No.1, Bhagalpur College of Engineering Campus, P.O.+ P.S.Sabour District Bhagalpur …. Petitioners. Versus 1.State Of Bihar. 2.Sri Ravi Kant, the Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.Sri Bhagwan Singh, the Director, Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of Bihar,Patna. 4.Sri Bhanu Pratap Sharma, t he Secretary, Finance Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ….. Respondents. ----------- 5. 28.09.2011 Heard the parties. It is not in dispute, as is apparent from Annexure- A to the show cause that an order has been passed by the Principal Secretary of the concerned Department on 13th September 2010 in purported compliance of order of this Court contained in Annexure-1. In that view of the matte, this contempt petition is finally disposed of but with liberty to the petitioner that if he is not satisfied with the order on merit, he may challenge the same through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. Jay/ (Shiva Kirti Singh,J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)