IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.13316 of 2011 Date of Decision.27.07.2011 M/s Vijay Rice Mills Dhuri Road Malerkotla, Distt Sangrur through its proprietor Ajay Kumar s/o Sat Bhushan Garg .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Room No.410, 4th Floor, Punjab Mini Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the deficiencies as pointed out in the impugned order are removed. The Director shall reconsider the petitioner's claim for allotment. The petitioner states that the documents which have been referred to in the impugned order were never demanded previously but he is prepared to submit the same and remove the alleged deficiencies. The petitioner may apply to the Director with the requisite documents in the manner referred to in the impugned order and on such submission of documents, the Director shall duly take a decision and communicate the same within a period of four weeks from the date of supply of the documents by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, dispensing with notice to the respondents at the stage of admission. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 27, 2011 Pankaj*