IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4719 of 2010 1. AYODHI PASWAN, SON OF RASIK LAL PASWAN. 2. BASUDEO PASWAN, SON OF BALDEO PASWAN. 3. SAHDEO PASWAN, SON OF BALDEO PASWAN. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KEWLA, POLICE STATION-BHIMPUR, DISTRICT-SUPAUL. ……………………………………………………PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………..OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioners : M/s. M. Nasrul Hoda Khan and Md. Nafisuz Zoha, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 23.2.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody since 21.10.2009. It is stated that the petitioners could not appear in the case as no notice was served upon them. It is also submitted that there is no other criminal case against the petitioners except the present one. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, (1) Ayodhi Paswan, (2) Basudeo Paswan and (3) Sahdeo Paswan, are directed to be 2 released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Assistant Sessions Judge- II, Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No.113/1982 (S.T. No.28/93), with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners must be their close relative or their family member, who will file affidavit before the court concerned giving full genealogy showing their relationship with the petitioners. Further, the petitioners shall remain present before the court concerned on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates, the court concerned will be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)