IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35949 of 2010 1. RAMASHISH BHAGAT @ RAMASHISH BHAKT 2. MANOJ BHAGAT @ MANOJ BHAKT 3. RAM PUKAR BHAGAT @ RAM PUKAR BHAKT 4. RAM CHANDRA BHAGAT @ RAMCHANDRA BHAKT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 21.12.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1905 of 2009 for offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 379 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel that cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for offence punishable under Sections 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and that whereas offence under Section 323 is bailable, the allegation of theft is a super imposition merely to implicate the petitioners against a non-bailable offence, let the petitioners, namely, Ramashish Bhagat @ Ramashish Bhakt, Manoj Bhagat @ Manoj Bhakt, Ram Pukar Bhagat @ Ram Pukar Bhakt and Ram Chandra Bhagat @ Ramchandra Bhakt in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order be released on bail upon each one of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Sri A.K. Manjhi, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1905 of 2009 subject to the condition stipulated under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)