\^ l<eHC©URTOF6HHAT11SeAPttlATBILASPWt ^JWitPefi)Uon(STNo?3lT2l?2fiiSf —- PeUtt'oner Respondenta t. ^ Sharin Kant Bubey S/e Shri Ghanshyam PrassKl Dub^.aged 53 years, Head Consteble No. 7519 RW, Out Po^ E L S S<aith East Central Railway (now tmdw the oider of removal (R»a seTviee), residing at Rahway Qyartsr No. 115®,Zone @ Bhilai Maishaling Yard, Bhitai, OsWctDufQ (C&^. Versus 1. The tAiton of hidia, through the Sscretary, Ministty of Ralhim^s, fteil Mantralay, Hew DeSm. 2. The Chltf Security fcoromissioner. RPF, South Ea^ Central Railway, Bilaspur (CG) 3. The D^»uty Chlrf SecufUy Con»ni»fener, RPF. Sariii East Cenbal RaSway, Bitaspur (CQ) 4. The Dhnsional Secuitfy Commissionw cum DiseipBnaiy Auttiority, RPF, SQU»I East Cenfral Railway, Raipur (CT5) 5. Shri GA Gaitail, Inspaetw, RPF Post Bhatapara, South East Central Rajlway, Bhatapara <C<3) Appeirrted asEnquiryOtficer. 6. Shri A.K. Lal, IPFjBMY. Po6t Commander, RPF, Marehallfr^ Yard. «iUai(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE <X»ISTITUTION®F INDIA SB: Hon'ble h4r. Justee Satish K. ^Bnihatri Shri Shrewan Chanctol, AA^ocsrte tor Iha l^lfioner. Shri P.S. Ifeshy, Advocate for Bie respondente No. 2 to 4. RBLER 2. 3. B/- (Passed on this 13"' day ofJune, 20®7) Leamed counset appMmng forthe pditkMierseeks peftnission of this Court to wiUidraw thts petUion wtth Uberty to raake a representation bsfora ttie respondent-authoriUas, to wrtrieh leamed counsel appearingfor the re^aondents tto. 1 to 4 hre no objection. tt Is ordered accordtngty. Thewrit petitton is acGordingly disiri»eds®wittKkawn witti theabove stated Itberty. | cj; ,^tisSiiK.giniU{ ••;<hKlge;"'?s:?^''' *,•