1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.363 of 2011 Mukhdeo Yadav . Versus The Rajendra Agriculture University & ors. ----------- 4. 01.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for appellant and the learned counsel for the Rejendra Agriculture University. As directed, learned counsel for the University has produced before us the answer-sheet/copy of the appellant and of other respondents. On perusal of short-hand dictation taken by the appellant in Hindi, we find the same is not in shorthand but in the longhand with few common abbreviations at some places. Hence, from the papers relating to the test of the appellant in Hindi shorthand and typing for the post of Personal Assistant, we are satisfied that he was rightly held not qualified because he failed to show even knowledge of Hindi short- hand, much less any proficiency. We may indicate that in our order dated 11th July 2011 we had given an option to the appellant to indicate his willingness for taking a short-hand test in Hindi in presence of both the counsel to be organized in the court premises under our orders. For records it is made clear that the appellant did not show his willingness for such test. In such circumstances, learned counsel for the appellant rightly requested us to decide the matter on merits after perusing the answer-sheet and relevant papers. We do not find any good reason to take a different view than that taken by the writ court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. It is made clear that the appellant will be at liberty to substantiate his allegation by lodging formal complaint before the authorities of the University that some of the respondents were selected for the post of P.A., although they do not possess requisite qualification. 2 If such allegations are made by the appellant and substantiated, the authorities of the University are expected to take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law without much delay. Jay/ ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) ( Shivaji Pandey, J)