»?PWWWW^ ~3"^[ ^NJ<n^, ^Tll^^!^, fa<riTy^< __^..C5)^:. •^ 200 ^IT^T <IT5f^ (^Gif3^?) a?ni^^i1^^ ^T^sii^rr ^W=F ^'R?lW^ft^3^T ^RfeRN^TR^f ^fetzt Tf^TT ^'3:tfeH3??^T Sinale Bench; Hon'ble /^p. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.Pc^No.7^'2009 (Petition U/A 226 of the'ponstitution of India) Petitioner Vs RESPONDENTS Smt. Sari Aged abc Main Hini Raipur- ( Bhataparc 1. State 2. 3. The Dir< Governm The Dis1 (C.G.) 06.2.2009 Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt, Heard. |ta Verma, W/o Shailendra Verma, |ut 41 years, Assistant Teacher, [li &irls School, Bhatapara, Distt. P.G.), R/o Gandhi Mandir Ward, |, bistt. Raipur (CG) jof Chhattisgarh, Through, The Secretarjy bepartment of Educcition, Mantralcjya, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.<5.) ^ctor Public Instruction, Chhattisgar-h ^nt Raipur, C)istt. Raipur (C.G.) |rict Education Officer, t)istt. Raipur for the petitioner. Advocate for the State. The petitioner, who was in|tially appointed on the post of Assistant Teacher in the Sch^ol Education bepartment of the State ^overnment, is aggri|eved by the action of the respondents in not adding two jadvance increments in her l^ ^;^^- ^i^^ K^T^J^^;r3^—^/95—l 1 /200H—i.00,000. T" ^ n .^~ -•" 7^r '^^prr^T^, ^Til^^i^, ra^rR^: ^WWIS %»H •W[200 311^T^ (^3^?) ^i^r^T^fw ??^T ^T^T iW^ x' --^ ^<nw^^3^r salary even though she did her ^ expenses before joining on the p\ Learned counsel for the petitioners case is squarely cov^red by the decision of this in W.P. (s) No.591/2009 betwe^n Preetam Singh Parihar and others Versus The State of Chhat-^isgarh and another decided by this Court and this petition may bjs disposed of in terms of the ;=bi^^^1^ 1nTR^f ^f t^st l1^R5^ '^'3ffiW37?^T l.Ed. Examination at her own >st of Assistant Teacher. 3etitioner submits that the direction given by this Court in the biforeSQid matter. The above fact has not beejn disputed by learned counsel for the State. In view of above, the instan^- petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to make payment of two advance increments to the petitioner fromj the date of her appointment within a period two months from tojday. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications mad4 by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. No order as to costs. ] Sd/- j Dhirendra Mishra 1 Judge v^^ ^^ .(^T^^^T^^t^Ttsr—FS/9S—! 1 /2008-? ,00-000,