Criminal Misc. No. M-22335 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-22335 of 2009 Date of decision : 15.12.2009 Tinku Kumar @ Anil Kumar and another ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR No. 64 dated 06.04.2009 registered under Sections 363, 366-A IPC at Police Station Rajpura, District Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out at the outset that petitioner No. 2 has already made a statement before the investigating officer stating that she has married petitioner No. 1 of her own free will. Thus, no offence is made out against petitioner No. 1. According to the counsel, investigation of the case is still pending. Learned counsel for the State submits that investigating officer shall be asked to take into consideration the statement made by petitioner No. 2 while submitting his final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, no further orders are called for. The petition is disposed of. Criminal Misc. No. M-22335 of 2009 2 In case, however, petitioners are still aggrieved, it will be open to them to avail of the remedy available to them under the law. 15.12.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE