IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31727 of 2008 Md.Jahangir, son of Md. Kalim, village Banaudha, PS Mufassil, District Munger – Petitioer. Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 2 6.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that charges have been framed under sections 25(1B)A/26(ii) of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that section 26(ii) of the Arms Act would not be applicable in this case and as such the case would be triable by a Magistrate. The court below has taken into consideration the fact that the petitioner was not manufacturer of arms, rather, the fact is that the petitioner was in possession of prohibited arms, namely, a 9 mm automatic revolver. Possession of such arms entails a punishment up to ten years. In the circumstances this court finds no illegality in the impugned order. This application is dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)