IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2011 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1933 RCRev..No. 353 of 2010() ------------------------------ RCA.6/2007 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC-I), MANJERI RCP.35/2005 of RENT CONTROL COURT, TIRUR .................... REVISION PETITIONER(APPELLANT IN THE APPELLATE COURT AND PETITIONER IN THE TRIAL COURT) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANDRAN,S/O.POTTEKKATTU SANKARAN, TIRUR TALUK AMSOM AND DESOM,POOKAYIL BAZAR P.O., PIN 676 107. BY ADV. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN THE APPELLATE COURT AND IN THE TRIAL COURT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RUKHIYA @ KUNHIBEEVI UMMA, D/O.PULIKKALAKATH KUNHIMOHAMMED HAJI,NIRAMATUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, TIRUR TALUK,NIRAMATHUR PO, 676 109. 2. VAHIDA,D/O.PULIKKALAKATH KUNHIMOHAMMED HAJI, NIRAMATUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, NIRAMATHUR PO - 676 109. 3. SAMAD, S/O.PULIKKALAKATH KUNHIMOHAMMED HAJI, NIRAMATUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, NIRAMATHUR PO - 676 109. 4. SHARAFUDHEEN,S/O.PULIKKALAKATH KUNHIMOHAMMED HAJI, NIRAMATUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, NIRAMATHUR PO - 676 109. 5. MOIDEENKUTTY,S/O.PULIKKALAKATH KUNHIMOHAMMED HAJI, NIRAMATUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, NIRAMATHUR PO - 676 109. svs ................2/-... ...2... R.C.R. NO.353/2010 6. PATHUMMAKUTTY UMMA, W/O.PULIKKALAKATH KUNHIMOHAMMED HAJI,NIRAMATUTHUR AMSOM AND DESOM, TIRUR TALUK,NIRAMATHUR PO 676 109. 7. PAREEKUTTY,S/O.PULIKKALAKATH ABDUL KHADER ALIAS BHAVA,TIRUR AMSOM , PORUR DESOM, POOKAYIL BAZAR PO, TIRUR TALUK,PIN 676 107. 8. ABOOBACKER,S/O.PULIKKALAKATH ABDUL KHADER ALIAS BHAVA,TIRUR AMSOM , PORUR DESOM, POOKAYIL BAZAR PO, TIRUR TALUK,PIN 676 107. R1 TO 8 BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------- R.C.R.No.353 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of June, 2011 Order Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The revision is filed by the landlord. His claim under Section 11(3) of the Act was concurrently found to be not bonafide. Mr.S.Vinod Bhat, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the landlord is no more. We feel that this is a case where the need which was projected by the landlord will not survive. We close the R.C.R on that reason without examining the merits of the grounds raised in this revision. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. srd 2 3