IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.472 of 2002 1. BIHAR STATE BOARD OF HINDU RELIGIOUS TRUST, Patna through its Chairman, Vidyapati Marg, Patna. 2. Manik Chand Sarraf, Son of late Bihari Ram Sarraf, Resident of Bari Tola, Ward No.4, Buxar Town, P.S. and Anchal-Buxar, District-Buxar. …….Plaintiffs/Petitioners Versus 1. RAM JEE PRASAD SINGH, Son of late Mahadeo Singh, Resident of Village-Purana Chauk Buxar, Ward No.3, Buxar, District-Buxar. 2. Most. Sarswati Devi, W/o Sri Lakshman Prasad Singh, Mohalla-Purana Chauk, Buxar, Ward No.3, Buxar. 2K. Dulhin Manju Devi, Wife of Sri Gopal Jee Prasad Jaishwal, Resident of Village/Mohalla-Pirnagar Gora bazaar, Gazipur, District-Gazipur (U.P.), Sewayat, Sri Bihari Jee, Radhika Jee, Baldeo Jee, Sri Rajeshwar Jee, Sri Mahabir Jee, Murtiyan, Resident of Mohalla-Purana Chauk, Buxar Town, P.S. and Anchal-Buxar, District- Buxar. …..Defendants 1st Set/Opp. Parties 1st Set 3. Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Shiva Jee Bhayee Singh, Resident of Charitra Bank, Buxar, District-Buxar. ....Defendants 2nd Set/Opp. Parties 2nd Set 4. Smt. Chintamani Devi, Wife of Ram Jatan Singh @ Jitan Singh, Resident of Village-Sarimpur, Ward No. 1, P.S. Buxar Audyogik, District-Buxar. 5. Ram Brat Singh. 6. Sudarshan Singh. 7. Hriday Narayan Singh. All sons of Shivnath Singh, Resident of Village- Sumeshwarsthan, Charitra Bank, Ward No. 9, P.S. and Anchal-Buxar, District-Buxar. ……..Defendants 3rd Set/Opp. Parties 3rd Set ----------- 25/ 21.04.2011 No body appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the present Civil Revision application. The present Civil Revision application has 2 been filed against the order dated 18.02.2002 passed by learned Sub-Judge III, Buxar in Title Suit No.54 of 1991, whereby the prayer for amendment made on behalf of the plaintiff-petitioner was partially allowed and partially rejected. The suit is pending since 1991. It also appears that this Civil Revision application was dismissed on one or other ground for four times earlier and was restored by different orders passed by this Court, which goes to show that the petitioners are very careless and negligent in prosecuting the present Civil Revision application. On perusal of the impugned order also, this Court does not find any legal infirmity in the impugned order. Accordingly, the Civil Revision application has to fail and it is dismissed. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of Title suit no.54 of 1991, if not already disposed of. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)