AB 2567/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. A.R. Shome, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State responde nt. By this application filed under Section 438 Cr. P.C., petitioners namely, 1) Shr i Radheshyam Sarkar and 2) Satrughan Singh have prayed for the benefit of pre-ar rest bail, in Connection with Bharalumukh P.S. Case No. 275/2011 under Sections 420/ 468/ 506/ 34 IPC. Perused the case diary. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the materi als available on records, more particularly, the note given by the I.O., I find no sufficient reason requiring custodial interrogation of the petitioners. There fore, prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the above mentioned case, the arresting authority shall release the petitioners on bail of Rs. 20,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount to the sat isfaction of the arresting authority. It is further directed that the petitioner s shall not interfere with the investigation in any manner and shall make themse lves available before the I.O. as when so required for the purpose of investigat ion. Return the case diary. The bail application is disposed of.