IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10162 of 2011 ==================================================== BANSHI LAL RAI - Petitioner/s(s) Versus HARE KRISHNA RAI & ORS - Respondent/s(s) ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. NAGENDRA RAI For the Respondent/s: Mr. ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO DATE: 04-07-2011 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO) 2. 04.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 2.4.2011 passed by the Munsif – 2nd, Chapra in Title Suit No. 28 of 1993 whereby the learned court below has exhibited some documents under Section 90 of the Evidence Act which was produced by the respondents. Since the documents have already been exhibited in this case, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order because it appears that all the documents are thirty years old and have been marked under Section 90 of the Evidence Act. If the petitioner, so advised, may raise these questions about 2 the reliability of the said documents at the time of final hearing of the suit. The learned court below shall consider the same. With this observation, this writ application is dismissed. S.S (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)