/ CL^s^ fs! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAmSGARHl W.A. No. eiS / 2009 (Arising out oforder dated 1 1-11-2008 passed by the Single Bench of this High Court, Hon'ble Justice Shri S.K. Agnihotri in W.P. No. 6397/2005) §i^..;i:s;^^U ^^•w^^s APPELLANTS / RESPONDENTS: 1. Sub Area manager SECL Gevra Project, P. O.- Gevra, Distt- Korba (C. G.) ..<,'p /•">L> ^.••" ••' \^^-/ O v o^y<^' ^.^\^ ^w-" 'J."y'.v ^y'y RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS 2. Deputy Chief Personal Manager, SECL Gevra Project, P. O.- Gevra, Distt- Korba (C. G.) 3. Area Security Officer, SECL Gevra Project, P. O.- Gevra, Distt- Korba (C. G.) VERSUS (1) Shatrughan Rai, S/o Shri Dhaneshwar Rai, aged about 38 years, Occupation- Driver. <\\\^ • %>" (-•«.^' ^ (2) JoginderPaswan, S/o Shri Mahjar Ram, aged about 39 years, Occupation- Helper. (3) Sudarshan Paswan, S/o Shri Bansropan, aged about 40 years, Occupation- Mason/Carpenter. (4) Gaya Prasad, S/o Shri Bandhu Prasad, aged about 39 years, Occupation- Driver. (5) Vidya Singh, S/o Shri Pujan Singh, aged about 40 years, Occupation- Mason/ Carpenter. ^ %; (6) S. N. Mishra, S/o Shri Nageshwar Mishra, aged about 39 years, Occupation- Welder. (AU R/o Deepika Colony, SECL, Gevra Project, Distt. Korba (Chhattisgarh) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 (1) OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO THE DIVISION BENCHl ACT. 2006 B mOH COURT OF CHHArrESGARH AT BUASFDIl DB: AtmeUants: Resoondents Hon'Me Sfari LM. Qudduai <» ^ Hon'ble Shri Prsuhairt Kumar Mlshra. JJ Writ Appeal Nb.35/2009 Sub-Area Manager, SECL sasA ottiCTS Vs. : Shatrughan Rai and Ctthera AiHBearance: Mr. P.S. Koshy with Mr. Wnod Deshmukh Coiinsel for the petitioners. Miss Sharmila Singhai wlth Mr. Anirito Das, counsel for the respondents. TOrit Appeal under Sectton 2 (l( ofthe CUatttau|Sarh Mi^b Court (Appeal to Dlvlsion Bencsli) Act. 20p6 ORALORDEK (08.04.2010) Per I.M. QUDDUSI. J This Writ Appeal has been filed against fhe impu®ned order dated 11/11/2008 passed by the teamed Sii^le Judge allowu^ fhe Writ Petition. In fa.et, Writ Petition No.2752/2005 is pendii^ before fhis court for adjudication, in wMch, the point involved is whefher the persons employed by fhe contractor m the establishment of the writ appellants includang fhe respondents in thls writ appeal should be treated as the employees of fhe writ appellants and the same is still pendlr^. This matter pertairK to vacating the quarters oecupied by fhe respondents since 1993 and some ofhCTS slnce 1983. Therefore, we are of the opmlon that the ewction •'"iT't'" "t' :-s^ ^"y ^^-t.-.-f^'' W.A.No.35 of2009 iE'ijSS' of the respondents depends upaa the fate of wrtt petition No.2752/2005. Hence, we di^iose of fhis appeal with a direction that tiill di^osal of the W.P.No.2752/2005, fhe respmidents may not be evfcted. The question oferiction (tf the respohdaats wlB depend upon adjudication of that mattCT and fhe appellants may consider tte same. 4. We also feel fhat W. P. No.2752/2005, whieh is pendtag since 2005, be disposed of at an early date, tlierefope, the R^istiy may list fhe ss&d writ petitimi atan eariy date for hearii^ subject to the orders (rfliie Hon'ble the ChlefJustice. 5. Accordii^ly, fhis wnt appeal stands disposal of. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- FrashantKumarMishra Judge Sao