IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0. /?' ^~^ /2006 'ffljllLE ©ENC gyi^u' PETITIONER <• ,..••* 'v° -.•••'. -.-•* ^^> ^•^c"..--""" ^€^y >-'.;.<^? Bansh Bahadur Singh, S/o late Alam Sai, aged about 41 years, occupation service, R/o viUage Chandan Nagar, PO. Premnagar, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) ^y" -•«y -fl^' >'<??- ^' RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) District Education Officer, Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3) Collector, Distt. Surguja, (C.G.) 4) Assistant Block Education Officer, Premnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER^ARTIC_LE 22^/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3IKW?iT W\v sn^i **ii<*'gita pa.^dte- t->^ ?^ IrJ^ ~TS[ •<i|i<41d<<, aflly'is, '(SRrreiy • •—p;^^ss^^ -3-> _.^^L...L3(Rlt>^2i OT^ITOIIWHita 1_M-208e Shri Ashok Kumar ShuMa, c< Shri Sateh Gupta, Dy. Govt. Heard. Learned counsel for the p« |>unsel for the peUUoner. lAdv.fortheState. ItiUoner submtte fliat the petitioner, who is an Assistant Teacher, has been trans(|erred during ban period a»dagainst the policy. He submits that he has submitte<jl a repr^entetfon but Uie sane has not been decided. Counsel for the Stete submits Having considered and withou the opinion of this Court, ends of ji «Bi<iici<<hTW^^ fsi^ifN^R ^T STfiOT SII$!ff that for the present the petitioner may be givan an opportunity of ffling the detailed repjresentation befare the competent authority of the respondents, which shall be consider^d on its own merits. in Efficordanc®with tew. Prayer is not opposed by the cjaunsel for the petitwsner. expressing anybpinlon on the merits ofthe case, in (istice wlll be served if a cBrec*ion is given to the petftipner to make a detailed repre^entatron afresh raislng his grtevances brfore the competent authority of the resporKleihts atong with a copy of the petition and this order, within 15 (Ssys from today, and on sucjh representation being filed, the comp^ent authority of the respondents shall decide the s^me pn its own merits in accorctance with law as early as possible preferably withln favo moni(hs from the date of receipt of the representaition. Learned counsel for the petitio(ier submits that the petitioner has not been relleved and he may be altowed to continue. | It is directed that if the petititiner has not been relieved, he may be allowed to continue tin the representatlon is decl<led. It is made clear that ifthe petitfoner has already been relieved, this order'will not erttitte the petitioner to rejoin at the earlier ptace of posting; | With the afbresaid observatK)rjs, this petition stands disposed o(. Consequently M.W.P.No. 131]2/2006alsostendsclisposedp^ Cettified eopy as per rutes. Sd/- Fak'nruddin Judge [Tft^i^3^[