IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23738 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. GIRIJA P.K., D/O.SANKARAN P.K., AGED 21 YEARS, PADANAYAKATHU KUNDIL HOUSE, KIZHUMURY P.O., PULASSERY VIA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. AKHIL A. BALAKRISHNAN, S/O.A.K.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 22 YEARS, AROKKARAN HOUSE, GANDHI NAGAR MAIN, CHEROOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23738 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 27.8.11 EXT.P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 27.8.11 EXT.P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERVIEW CARD/ADMISSION MEMO ISSUED BY THE DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA DATED 1.7.2011 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23738/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech (Electrical and Electronics) regular Degree Examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs