THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.NO.13913 OF 2004 18-01-2010 BETWEEN; V.Satish ...Petitioner vs. The Government of A.P. rep. By its Principal Secretary and three others. ...Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.NO.13913 OF 2004 ORAL ORDER: (Per GR,J) Heard Sri M.Kondal Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner an the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education for responden Nos.1 to 3 and Sri P.Kamalakar, the learned counsel for the 4t respondent. The inaction of the 2nd respondent in initiating action against the 4t respondent in respect of the alleged misappropriation of funds to the tun of Rs.23,41,000/- by the 4th respondent as revealed by the proceeding dated 31-03-2004, is the grievance in this writ petition filed in publi interest. Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 27-10-2009 the 2n respondent issued proceedings dated 31-10-2009 suspending th management of the 4th respondent for failing to comply with the earlie orders dated 09-09-2009, directing the management to remit the amount o Rs.23,41,000/-. Against the order dated 09-09-2009 of the 2nd responden directing the correspondent of the 4th respondent to remit the amount o Rs.23,41,000/- into the joint account, the management preferred an appea under Section 86(b) of the A.P. Education Act,1982 before th Government. By the orders in G.O.Rt.No.19 Higher Education (VC.1) Departmen dated 08-01-2010 the State Government allowed the appeal and set asid the order of the 2nd respondent dated 09.09.2009. In the circumstances the basis for the grievance of the petitioner n longer subsists. The petitioner if aggrieved by the order in G.O.Rt.No.19 i at liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings separately. On the analysis above the writ petition is dismissed. No order as t costs. ______________ GODA RAGHURAM,J __________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 18th JANUARY 2010. TSNR