IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1066 of 2008 MD. SHABBIR @ MD. SHIBBU & ANR Versus UMA DEVI & ORS ----------- 3. 8.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court merely because the petitioners have been added as a party in T.S.No. 14/1993 will not confer them right to be also added as a party in T.S.No. 9/1993 (the present suit), out of which this civil revision application arises. The grievance of the petitioners that they would be affected by the outcome of the judgment and decree in T.S.No. 9/1993 is to be noticed by this court for its being rejected because if they have not been made party they will never be found by the decree passed in that suit. So far the grievance of the petitioners with regard to subject matter of these two suits being the same, this Court after comparative reading of the prayer portion of T.S.Nos. 9/1993 and 14/1993 would find that they cannot be said to be exactly similar covering the same suit land. However, if the petitioners can demonstrate 2 before the court below by filing a self contained analogous petition that both the suits in effect are pertaining to the same issue and are almost identical, the court below would consider this prayer of the petitioners to make both the suits analogous. Such decision of the court, however, will be absolutely based on its appreciation as with regard to the nature and scope of T.S.Nos. 9/1993 and 14/1993. Be that as it may, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this civil revision application is dismissed with the aforementioned observations. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/