IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29671 of 2011 Mukesh Kumar @ Pradip Kumar son of Ram Lakhan Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 12.9.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Dighwara P.S. case No.12 of 2006 (Sessions Trial No.796 of 2010) instituted for the offence u/s.364A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner’s name transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused, for which he is in custody since 23.7.2007, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. The Trial Court (1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra) is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order to the S.P., Saran at Chapra and the S.P., Saran at Chapra is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )