IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.205 of 2004 KHAIRUN NISSA Versus GORAKH PRASAD SONI & ORS ----------- For the appellant: M/s Ravi Shankar Dwivedi, Ranjan Kr.Dubey, Shailendra Kumar Dubey, Advocates For the respondents: M/s Chandra Kant and Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocates. -------- 04. 16.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the defendant- appellant-appellant and learned counsel for plaintiff-respondent – respondent no.1. In a suit for declaration of title and other ancillary reliefs both the learned courts below have come to the conclusion that Sharifa Devi was the legally wedded wife of Sudama Pandey and they were blessed with two daughters and three sons, whereas Sudama Pandey developed illicit connection with Sandhya Devi, defendant no.5 and managed to bring fraudulent document in order to affect the title of the plaintiff-respondent over the suit land and that the identity of defendant no.2 was established on the basis of evidence on record and that the evidence on record also proved execution of sale deed by defendant no.2 in favour of plaintiff-respondent no.1 and that plaintiff-respondent no.1 has proved his title and possession over the suit land acquired by him by registered sale deed dated 31.08.1996 (Ext.-3). In the said circumstances, this court does not find any illegality in the said judgments and decree of the 2 learned courts below, nor does it find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. sunil ( S.N.Hussain,J.)