s/ XI-HG—78 's^s "^i^id^, ®tily'is,fsjdiy^< sn^r qn ft-ii'* OTI sn^i *tii^ ^rafepN wraf •?-fsi^ ^snwan^r fSinqle Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P. [s (Petition U//\ 226/2J PET1TIONERS 1. Punni aged; Driv^ 2. Bali ageq agecj ageq 8. Vija^ Shr( helpt 9. Aruj a9e<| Me1JE 10. Dwcjr agef No.6168/2006 j27 of Constitution of India) Lal Sahu, S/o lae Naththu Lal Sahu, about 53 years, posted as Road Roller ;r |Ram Sahu, S/o Bishnu Ram Sahu, aged abou|t 59 years, posted at Chowkidar 3. Chaitram Sahu, S/o Ramai Sahu, aged 56 year^, Posted as Chowkidar 4. Jailc|l Sahu, S/o Hagru Ram Sahu, aged about 41 y^ars, posted as Labourer 5. Bhadwati Prasad Sahu, S/o Mehattar Sahu, 41 years, posted as Labourer 6. (Sirdhari Lal Sahu, S/o Bhukhau Ram Sahu, 37 years, posted as Labourer 7. Tor4n Lal Sahu, S/o Mehattar Ram Sahu, 38 years, posted as Helper Kumar Shrivastava, S/o &.K. 'astava, aged about 52 years, posted as r Kumar Tandan, S/o Guhri Ram Tandan, about 43 years, posted as Assistant r Reader ika Prasad Sahu, S/o Dukalha Ram Sahu, about 39 years, posted as Pump Opejrator 11. Bad worK Prasad yadav, S/o. Ram Vishal Yadav, age^l about 40 years, posted as Pump operator 12. Shrjram Sahu, S/o Sakha Ram Sahu, aged abo^t 41 years, posted as 1-lelper/Clerical />> "<%. 1. '<a^-.,"s?- XI-HG—7! TST -^WM<i, 0ial'(-l'l<o, [cKII-M^ a^TT^r C^SI^T) 3n^r qn !i;-iicii 'HSTT 3?n^T^>^iqi TOTWafsa ani?i -z' wifepih qrfHf ^ fesr TfSre^R ^raflwsii^r JethU 13. abou' 14. &ahr 15. Shivl Tn'pt Hetp) 16. Atm<! aboul 17. Dev< Mis^ 18.Raml agea| 19. Rarnij aboul 20.1 abotj 21. Komij aboif ZZ.Makf 42 y( 23.Hem} Marl HelFJi 24. S.P. aboil' 25. Netj age-q 26. Balaj aboij' 27.Mant Gandsh Ram Sahu, S/o Nandu Ram Sahu, aged 37 years, posted as Helper Chantfrika Prasad t5ahre, S/o Ram Bhau r^e, aged bout 46 years, posted as Helper Kumar Tripathi, S/o Shri Ram Dulare ^thi, aged about 41 years, posted as >^r Ram Sahu, S/o Mohan Lal Sahu, aged jjl- 57 years, posted as Pump Operator jsh Kumar Mishra, S/o Rameshwar 1^'a, aged about 57 years, posted as helper Kumar Nishad, S/o Nandu Ram Sahu, |about 37years, posted as Helper ^yan Nishad, S/o Jati Ram Nishad, aged aboujt 44 years, posted as helper Gan^sh Ram Nishad, S/o Fagua Nishad, aged 51 years, posted as Chowkidar Singh Nishad, S/o Bodhan Nishad, aged 42 yeo.rs, posted as Time Keeper lan Lal Nishad, S/o Bodhan, aged about ;ars, posted as Helper int Kumar Markam, S/o late Milau Ram <am, aged about 20 years, posted as Hel|^er ]Chhatterjee, S/o K.L. Chatterjee, aged 42 years, posted as Lineman Ram Nishad, S/o Kartik Ram Nishad, about 44 years, posted as Helper |Ram Verma, S/o Puranik Lal Verma,aged jt 37 years, posted as Helper )har Lal Yadav, S/o Bhukhan Lal Yadav, agecj about 55 years, posted as Time Keeper. 28.KirtjinSingh Maravi,5/o Late Ajit Singh XI-HG—78 '3^ •<<i'4icn^, E!>t)ly'i<o, fsisiiyy Sli^T ^VK (Tjqfgq^l?) 3^v w Wi* g«nant?twqNi TOTOT Tlfgff sn^t y ^PTferft1; "WERfl ^ feig ^ Mar ipi, aged about 41 years, posted as pump oper<jitor. 29.Tihar)u Ram Sahu, S/o Late Moti Ram Sahu, agedjabout 61 years, posted as Chowkidar. SO.Jagdjsv Ram Sahu, S/o Late Dukalha Ram Sahi^, aged about 4 years, posted as Choidkidar. 31. Kanhjaiya Ram Sahu, S/o Oayaram Sahu, aged abouj' 55 years, posted as Chowkidar. All the [ietitioners are working in the office of Chhattis^garh State Industrial Developmeht Corporafion Limited, Urla, Raipur (C6) Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Sta-1 Oep^ Raipjur 2. Chh Ltd. Beeiba Raiplur 3. Chh thn (C6 Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharwani,Advocatefc{i Mr. Y.S. Thakur, &y. Adv. Gener'c^ Mr. Ayaz Naved, Advocate for r^ Mr. Sanjay S. Agarwal, Advocate) of ChhattiS9arh, through- Secretary, irtment Industries, &.K.5. Bhawan, •(C6) ittisgarh State Industrial Development through-its Mana9in9 Director, Jeevan Ni9am Commercial Complex, Pandri, •(C6) ittisgarh Ispat Bhumi Ltd. (CJ.B.L.) ugh-its Managing Director, Urla, Raipur the petitioner. for respondent No.l-State. spondent No.2. for respondent No.3. XI-HG—78 sn^r qii fs-ijq? <TSIT ^TT^T^RI^ A 'S'ST ^iqidti, ©•til.y'Ko,fq<niyii< sn^r ^^K (^3siyr) —^ <*wi<-t*fl-) •WR?ii •?fsvi ^f 16.10.2008 Learned counsel for the submit that after passing of (Annexure P-3), the respondent 8.7.2008 and accordingly, the ins- In view of above submissioln instant petition is dismissed as h^ving become infructuous. letitioners and respondent No.2 herein •he impugned order dated 23.10.2006 No.Z-CSIDC has recalled the same on ant petition has become infructuous. of learned counsel for the parties, the .-^°- s^a^svtta ^^"