0403ca9466.08.sxw 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. C. A. NO. 9466/2008 IN FAST NO. 19013/2006 The Collector, Buldhana & another Vs. Vishnu Namdeo Garkal & another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 04th March, 2009. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Learned Advocate appearing for the respondents strongly opposes the application. The reasons stated in the application are neither convincing nor the delay is well explained. The usual ground is taken that because of the procedural difficulties the delay is caused. But, there are no details to show the reasons of the delay. Even considering the merits of the matter, the Reference Court has awarded the compensation @ Rs. 9,842/- per acre. The area of the land acquired of the 0403ca9466.08.sxw 2 claimants is to the extent of 0.38 H.R. and the compensation awarded to the claimants/respondents is Rs. 9,350/-, after considering the sale instances. I see no reason to say that the compensation is exorbitant. On the contrary, considering the material on record, the Reference Court has awarded just and fair compensation to the claimants. There is no reason to show any indulgence in the enhanced compensation arrived at by the Reference Court. In view of these facts, the application is rejected. JUDGE wwl