IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.37659 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 JAGROOP SINGH & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. VR Lamba, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.140 dated 19.11.2010 under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471-A, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Ghall Khurd, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-1). 2 Para-1 of the preliminary submissions of the reply filed on behalf of the respondent-State discloses that investigation has been concluded. It has been found that the accused have no concern or connection with the alleged embezzlement of the amount. On that count, cancellation report has been prepared and is pending approval with the senior authorities. 3 In view of the stand of the respondent-State, the cause Criminal Misc. No.37659 -M of 2010 (O&M) 2 of action does not survive in favour of the petitioners. 4 The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 5 Respondent-State is directed to ensure that the cancellation report is filed within a period of three weeks from today. Before filing the cancellation report, complainant/respondent No.2 shall be notified at the address given in the petition. Complainant/respondent No.2 would be at liberty to avail of alternate remedies. September 13, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?