;.k. 1 - ' ^ '(d2-— IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILAM*UR (CHHATnSGARHl W.P.(Art227)No.^^J-l of2010 PETITIONER /: Applicant Judgement •'^••••—-•"^^^'^]:^.. ^^b¥^^:2i^........ RESPONDENT Applicant Decree Holder Ramlakhan Sahu, son of late Purushottam Lal Sahu, Village Manendragarh, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) Versus Banshilal Soni, son of late Jawahar Mal Soni, VUlage Manendragarh, Disti-ict Korea (Chhattisgarh) WRn* PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTmjTlON OF< INDIA K!i 'Ks'SfSB ^sS^ ass •g na B 11!":.^ ^•M 88 »w?^». m. HK3H «HHA1"nSQftRI-I^TBlt.ASa,lg Wntl:>etiUtmlE227i^iB.236»t*20W 'S':: „••-':.a:an^?<.fe- Petitioner Applieant Jydgnient debtor Respondent Applftsnt Decree Holder :Ramlal^anfc»Sahu,». SpR^"liOC"^..lat9;-. ',PtmaS|)ottam^g:j^t^32g||ug:3%i9s^ Mai'MMitfragart'^^w' ^iasiti<el*:-w» oFes<fe .jpihattlsprh).;;:3®:"w'*l!';'"'"' Verslis '':::':' ;,, .' ''^' Banstjilal Soni, se»n^>ftaf JawaHar Mal Stffii. ^llage ;Maj iuj||8iB^Wl^sB;|| Korea^ehhattisgarhii !(.!)»- m ^Si^:/ (IAMP!^ittonun<leFArticle227ofthe^©OHStitirtto oflnelis^ '(SB::,Hon'trfe:.Mr.'T.t>.ShWCTia,J^-..K;l'..:-i*"^—;' li>resetrts'l.l;';''-:-:'::'.^i.?;''' '-/'.' : ::-,1.:;^^,..^.,:;, ": - •is;;s^i*."'w'^ ^ Mr.H.B./iigran^ Sertor<^reet<^ »^ •,,petiti<mer' •'l.-.'.'^ ;'•...:,,'',;^ Mr-ParagKrtecha, Gounseltortherespondant. /,.%;"y|(Paise|liiJiil|BBiBiii,,,M':::::'^^^/^' 1. ^Heard.'::.-•'•'•.:••^l:'::i:''.'.i:^^':'::'1^^ -:' :',• '?.: :: 1; 2. lhaTOperusedWeorder^stod17^^03;(^^exyre^ ^dgeC1^4t, Mariendragarh, m ExB<^ion©iMit^ We C^l dudge Gaa^ll tas clismiss^tht?^^ p8tttionief/judgiment?dy^ for dism^.a^W?^ ground effull satBlacBon ofthederiree. \,'.^^:,{^i^:^y^ 3. Leamecl counsel forthe pstttioner submtethatthedecrMwasferwtctIon afwi arrears <rf ra^ ineluyhT®^i^^ oftl^sutt,^^ enteredtnto^ 2^ern»ito 5i3.t999a^ satisfied only on e delhrery of ths posse^ten tf fcrtheranee ofsuch ^reemeirt, ttwpeWoneEfjudgment^ overthep<^TCstontethere^ondei^eereehoiawon5^.19 anct1he resirondenttias i^W (Wtifk^efr^ll saBs*aK;tlon^<^^^^ therespondentisnoterrtittedfor^ny®(9cutkwyrec<^ 4. Leamed counsel Rlacad relianw ^n^tlW OTratt&^ltai^ ^a^it«&^^^ •Mfe:Lal.Shand::I^Hc-Gharital^^r^^ which^ Apex ©ourthasheklttialiuinm^sion un<te<^ "n'r'fi1ffiiffiRfl-''''fi: —-2-.: C.P^ ist^e«ide» ancl^uffciei ^dism ^ <^:be-reiNeretf:onadri^slon.l'',^...';^''-..^;s 5. Onthe rth^rhand.^rrredc^ ai^ submitsthatWe p ftetitioneronS^.ISMand^as^ex^^ of <te^e has been sati^ money ^SSVy:3:'-fS!WSws execuUenfor^hreecwryina^wclar^ DecreehoNercancertitytWesaB'^^iimoflhec^^ notcertiftedbyth&yeere^Md^rin^heCourt.thenlt-e^ satisfactttm^^frdeGreearadl^ecreeholdeTis^^^ sams.! :'. ':: ,::•;, •;•;.'''.•'' :-: ' ' : ,. .- A:..l',,..'.,;^...>/^,;'w.;.i.;.K;i--iteit!^^^^^^^^^ & <Serfifi<^te^ated5^.1%8;vimttentyUwrs^ond8nts^^ been saUsfledand tw hasobtained oniypi^^ decroe hdder has fll^ ®e6<aiti^p^ satisfiedthenTOneypaitWthe^eGT^ :.-';2l.Rute2-or^^C;;ff.O.,:.':'^;:^^./:^^ Bl. 7.^As;'t ldllby;the'Ap^,eeurt:^tri^the'R3aittB^ th? presenf resRondent has nc< actt^ittecti thaeoult,the»Bfore,?itiscliffiWlttohold1Hrt^tTCrwt^fee^ 8. OR th&afore%hi?|rouna^ane^th8©MIJuc^^^^C^ ^oblectisn ofthe peBtioner ana tas procw Civll ^Judge Glgss-W has not; coh'mifttBtt^^ a^ Uia ol^eettonbftHep^onw.tclo^nGtflncla^ 9.COnsequently,t^prtition^ngdav^^ni^is^Uat^^te ftisherebydlsmissecl.NoorelerastoGOSts. sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge