AB 705/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also hea rd Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. CD, as called for, has been produced today. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused petitioner, as a fake CID Ins pector, met the informant and demanded some amount of money. At that time, he wa s wearing his uniform. It is verified from the CD that the accused petitioner is in fact a CID inspector. He holds an identity card issued by the competent depa rtmental authority and as such, there is no doubt that he is a CID Inspector. Ho wever, it has been found from the CD that he went to the informant’s place for t he purpose of investigation which was not assigned to him. There is also nothing on record to show that any disciplinary proceeding has bee n initiated against him. However, the inquiry report dated 16.02.2011 submitted by DSP, CID, Assam, is available on the record. The accused petitioner has already appeared before the IO concerned and his stat ement has also been recorded. In my considered view, although the accused petitioner has committed some miscon duct, I find that there is no chance of his absconding or jumping the bail, if t he same is granted to him inasmuch as he is a regular government employee and a permanent resident of Guwahati staying with his family members. In view of the above, the interim bail order passed by this court earlier, is he reby made absolute on the same terms and conditions and also on the condition as prescribed under Section 437(3) of CrPC, 1973. The bail application stands disposed of.