IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3196 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3196 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3196 OF 2008 1.Shri Namedo Santu Charoskar, 2.Shri Navnath Kalu Ingale, 3.Shri Sanjay Balasaheb Dhule, 4.ShriPundlik Santu Charoskar, .. Applicants. Vs The State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent. Mr Rameshwar N. Gite, for the applicants. Mr K.V.Saste, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 18/11/2008 DATE : 18/11/2008 DATE : 18/11/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Gite, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr.Saste, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.I-44 of 2008 of Pimpalgaon police station. The said crime has been registered against the applicants for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 395 and 397 read with 34 of IPC. It is alleged that the applicants committed dacoity on 4.4.2008 at about 2.45 am and robbed the complainant when he was in his house. It is alleged that they robbed gold bangles of the wife of the complainant and one mobile phone. In the course of investigation, a test identification parade was conducted in which the complainant and the other witnesses identified applicant nos 3 and 4. There is also recovery at the instance of applicant nos.3 and 4. Insofar as applicant nos 1 and 2 are concerned, they were neither identified in the test identification parade nor is there any recovery at their instance. Hence, I am inclined to enlarge applicant nos. 1 and 2 on bail. Insofar as applicant nos. 3 and 4 are concerned, their application for bail is rejected. It is pertinent to note that applicant nos 1 and 2 do not have criminal antecedents at their credit. Hence, the following order. 3. Applicant Nos.1 and 2 to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.35,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to conditions that they shall report to the concerned police station every Wednesday and Saturday between 7 and 8 pm for a period of six months and thereafter on every alternate Saturday till conclusion of the trial. 4. The Application of applicant nos 3 and 4 is rejected. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)