IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 398 OF 2009 Ninad R. Thatte …Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.. …Respondents. ---- Mr. Jaideep Lele i/b Mr.Bharat Rathod, for the Petitioner.. Mr. H.J Dedhia, APP for the State. ---- CORAM: A.S. OKA, J. DATE: 7TH JULY, 2009. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is being prosecuted for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Kothrud Police Station at Pune. The petitioner was granted bail by an Order dated 26th March 2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, at Pune. An application for cancellation of the bail was made by the respondents before the Sessions court. By an order dated 27th January, 2009 the Sessions Court has cancelled the bail granted in favour of the Petitioner. The order of bail was cancelled on the ground that the petitioner failed to report to the Police Station from 1st September 2008. : 2 : 2. When this Petition came up before this court, on 8th June, 2009, Petitioner was directed to attend the concerned Police Station on 15th June, 2009 at 11.00 a.m. and he was directed to co-operate in the investigation. By the said Order this Petition was directed to be finally decided at the stage of admission. When this Petition came up on 22nd June, 2009, the learned APP for the State stated that in terms of order dated 8th June, 2009, the petitioner has attended the concerned Police Station. The only grievance made by the APP was that the Petitioner was not residing at the address disclosed in the writ petition. In terms of the direction issued on that day, the petitioner has filed an affidavit dated 25th June 2009 in which he has set out his permanent address, Cell Phone number as well as temporary address. 3. It is not in dispute that now charge sheet has been filed. The impugned order shows that initially the Petitioner was directed to attend the Police Station on every Saturday. The said order was later on modified and the petitioner was directed to attend the Police Station on every 1st and 15th day of month till filing of charge sheet. Now the charge sheet is filed. The Petitioner has attended the Police Station in terms of the above Order. The petitioner has furnished his permanent and temporary addresses as well as Cell number. Hence, the impugned order : 3 : deserves to be set aside. 4. Hence, I pass the following order: a) The impugned order dated 27th January 2009 is quashed and set aside and order granting bail passed on 26th March 2008 is restored. b) The Petitioner will file fresh bail bonds within a period of six weeks from today. c) The Petitioner shall report to the concerned Police Station once in a calendar month till the end of Trial. JUDGE