BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15865 of 2011 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP. BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SELLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. CRIME NO.1949/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : NO REPRESENTATION FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR BAIL UNDER SEC.439 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- There is no representation for the petitioner and even though the case is passed over to 12.30 p.m., there is no representation then also. 2.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.According to the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for bail for the offence under Section 8(c) r/w 21(B) of NDPS Act registered in Cr.NO.1949 of 2011 by the respondent police. 4.The allegations made in the petition would go to show that no recovery was made from the petitioner and he has not involved in the said incident and he voluntarily surrendered before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Madurai. 5.However, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the total seizure was 600 gms of heroine without any valid licence. He would further submit that this is a serious offence and if or any reason, the petitioner is released on bail, there is a likelihood of absconding and witnesses may likely to be tampered. 6.Considering the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court finds that the observation made by the learned Principal Special Judge for NDPS act cases, Madurai that the illegal possession of 600 gms of heroine is commercial quantity appears to be sound. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 7.Hence, I do not find any reason for differing with the view of the learned Principal Special Judge for NDPS Act cases, Madurai. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 07/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SELLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15865 of 2011 Date :07/12/2011 2P/4C RPB : 12.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/