IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3486 of 2011 JAGNARAIN RAM DUSADH S/O LATE PANCHAM DUSADH R/O VILL ORAGAR, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DIST. KAIMUR AT BHABHUA --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA 3. THE D.M. SHAHABAD, ARA 4. THE D.M. ROHTAS AT SASARAM 5. THE D.M. KAIMUR AT BHABHUA ---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02 24.02.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner has filed the present application seeking a direction upon the concerned respondent including the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua for payment of muavaza with interest for land(s) acquired by them. With regard to the title of his land(s), he has attached Annexure-1 which is copy of the records of right wherefrom it appears that Thaga Dusadh was recorded as under raiyat (darmiyani hakdar) in respect of land(s) appertaining to khewat no. 1/3. It is the petitioner’s case that land(s) was/ were acquired by the respondents soon after vesting of zamindari rights. Such issue is now being raised for the first time before this Court after several decades. This Court, in that view of the matter, is not inclined to entertain the present application and issue direction/writ/order based on the scanty pleadings on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that some identical applications filed by other claimant was similarly dismissed but with the observation as under:- 2 “At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be approaching the Court of competent jurisdiction for the relief. Petitioner is at liberty to do so.” Learned counsel for the petitioner handed in a copy of the order dated 06.01.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 62 of 2011 (Kanhaiya Dusadh vs. State of Bihar & Ors) which is kept on record marked X. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court while dismissing the application observes that petitioner would be at liberty to approach Court of competent jurisdiction for ventilation of his grievance(s). Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)