1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 655/2008 M/s. Ashlesha Power Controls ..vs.. Kalim Khan Kadar Khan. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Saboo, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tambde, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 5 th September, 2008 1. This is a petition filed by the employer challenging the interim order passed and confirmed by both the Authorities, thereby directed the petitioner/non applicant to reinstate the respondent to his former post in service with continuity till decision of the complaint and further directed the respondent to file written statement. This order of dated 08.02.2006 has been confirmed by the Industrial Court by order dated 11.12.2007, therefore, the present writ petition. 2. This Court by order dated 13.02.2008 issued notice and directed to maintain status quo. The said status quo has been in force till this date. 3. Without observing anything on merits of the matter, one thing his very clear that the observations as 2 recorded are of prima facie nature. In view of the disputed facts on record including even of the relationship of the employer and employee as agitated, goes to the root of the matter. The detailed enquiry and trial is necessary to adjudicate those issues. In this background, it is necessary that the complaint as filed by the respondent need to be adjudicated/decided as early as possible to avoid further delay in the matter including the rights of the parties in either way. 4. In view of this, I am of the view that the complaint pending before the Labour Court, Akola be disposed of as early as possible preferably within six months. The parties shall cooperate to see that the matter could be disposed of in the given time. 5. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside keeping all points open. The petition is accordingly allowed with no order as to costs. JUDGE kahale