IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22445 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.01.2011 Sudesh Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Babbar Khan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anil Rathee, Addl. A.G. Haryana for respondents No. 2 and 4. Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Advocate,for respondents No.3& 5. **** RANJAN GOGOI, A.C.J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have received some assurance from the respondent- authorities that their grievances would be looked into and settled in accordance with law. He has, therefore, prayed for disposal of this PIL by an order directing the legal notice dated 09.12.2010 (Annexure P-3) to be disposed of at an early date. Having regard to the issues involved and the prayer made, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this PIL by directing appropriate orders to be passed on the legal notice dated 9.12.2010 (Annexure P-3) within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In the event the petitioners continue CWP No. 22445 of 2010 [2] feel aggrieved by such decision that will now be taken by the respondents, it will be open for them to approach this Court once again, if they are so advised. (RANJAN GOGOI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) 28.01.2011 JUDGE 'ravinder'