IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 23881 of 2010(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- AMEENA BEEVI, SAJEENA MANZIL, VARUMEL KIZHAKKETHIL, PUNALUR PAPER MILLS POST CHALAKKODU, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY SRI.K.T.THOMAS (KANNAMPALLIL) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PUNALUR SUB DIVISION, PUNALUR,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUNALUR POLICE STATION, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. HASSANKUTTY, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PATHEKKAR,CHEMANTHUR PUNALUR 691 305 4. MAHEEN CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PATHEKKAR,CHEMANTHUR PUNALUR 691 305 5. SULTHAN BEEVI SHALIAN MANZIL, CHEMMANNOOR, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 691 305. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. R4 BY ADV. SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.23881 OF 2010: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.8.2009 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PUNALUR. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 13.11.2009 IN WPC NO.31504/2009 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 20.11.2009 BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16.1.2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 20.7.2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.23881 of 2010-I ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 2nd day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. Petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “i. to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 & 2 to provide adequate protection to the life of the petitioner, and her family from respondents 3 to 5 and their men. ii. to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Ist and 2nd respondents to take action on the complaints of the petitioner as appearing at Exhibit P3 to P5.” 2. We heard the learned counsel for the parties. Allegations are made against respondents 3 to 5. According to the petitioner, there is a civil suit pending and respondents 3 to 5 are threatening the petitioner to withdraw the civil suit. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 3 to 5 submits that, the parties are relatives, they are not parties to the proceeding and no threat is caused by respondents 3 to 5 and that they have no intention to cause any threat as alleged in the writ petition. We record the said submission. WPC NO.23881/2010 -2- Besides recording the same, we make it clear that, in case there is any threat made by respondents 3 to 5 to the petitioner as alleged and it is brought to the notice of the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent will look into the complaint, and, if it is found to be genuine, action shall be taken to give adequate protection for the life of the petitioner as against respondents 3 to 5. We also make it clear that, we have not gone into the merits of the allegations made by the petitioner and further that the Civil Court/forum shall be free to decide the case untrammelled by anything contained in this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.C.HARI RANI) JUDGE. MS