IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2009 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 268 OF 2009 MASTER NILU ANAND KHUTTKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SUDHAKAR DESSAI AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. Naik, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. D. Navelkar, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Coram:- A. S. OKA, J. Date:- 25th June, 2010 P.C. The office noting shows that notice issued to the second respondent through the Court in Karnataka has been duly served. Prayer for condonation of delay is opposed by the learned Counsel appearing for the third respondent. 2. The appeal is preferred by the original claimants for enhancement in compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Considering the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). A. S. OKA, J. SMA