IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10372 of 2009 SUDHAKAR PRASAD SINHA, son of Late Munshi Gorakh Nath Lall, R/o Village & P.O. Raghunathpur, P.S. Brahampur, District Buxar. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Health Commissioner-Cum-Principal Secretary to Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Finance Commissioner Cum Principal Secretary to Government, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director in Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Regional Deputy Director, Health Services, Patna Division, Patna. 5. The District Magistrate, Patna. 6. The Civil Surgeon Cum C.M.O., Patna. 7. The Medical Officer in charge, Primary Health Centre, Phulwarishariff, Patna. 8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 9. The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna. 10. The Treasury Officer, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 21.8.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 1 of the writ application. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as on today, the grievances of the petitioner remain only with regard to the payment of provident fund dues, the due amount of leave encashment and difference of pay due to incorrect fixation etc. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his claims, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the 2 petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Patna (respondent no.6). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims, which, according to the petitioner, are still not settled, as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents in support of his claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.6 shall consider the pending claims of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)