7 iingi® 'ss IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR _^^_. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) N0. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. ^ A'.-A .^^ ^yy^ ..-••"'^•n.y a.^ ^y^ '^y .••"' ''•y\'~i/.-- 2. 3. 4. '/'" Agrawal S/o. Mansharam, aged about 62 years, R/o. Agrasen Marg, Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Sectary, Departa'nent of General Administration D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Registrar of Trade Mark, Intellectual property Bhawan, S.M. Road, Antop Hill, Mumbai - 400037 Registered Partnership firin, Place of business Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Murlidhar Agrawal S/o. aged about 55 years, Anand Kumar Agrawal S/o. 5. aged about 53 years, -^ 6. Har Prasad Rathore S/o. Ramratan Rathore, aged about 35 years, tJS Respondent No. 4 to 6 ar& R/o. Ganj Chowk Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE i ashoK PETITSO H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WR!T PETiTiON ('Q N0.3873 OF 2011 iabulal A.grawal ft:j';!sl'i.l:1 •.i''~"r&'. j|-,^.4-t4"fTtf;':=?*l!-i°CT""'i"^'~°~" versus State of Chhattisaarh & Others 'rit Petition under Articie 228 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri B.P.Sharma with Shri Amit Sharma, Advocates for the respondents No.3 to 6. (Passed on thls 20th-day of September, 2011) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition wit'n liberty to take recourse to alternative statutory appellate forum, avaiiable under the provisions ofSection 91 ofthe Trade Marks AcS, 1999 (for short 'theAci, 1999'). No oblection from other side. Learned counsei further submits that since the petitioner was pursuing this petition bonaficte in this Court. Thus, the time spent in the High Court may be condoned. in view of the fact that in the matter, ruie has been issued on 13.09.2011. Thus, the time spent in t'ne High Court shal! be condoned whiis computing ihe iimitation period, as provided under sub Section 1 ofSection 91 ofthe Act, 199S. Accordingly, the writ petliion is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. Ru!e stands discharged. ——=: Sd^-.''.,,,;'. Ii:N;lii hK.Agmteetn i Judge p,