IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1963 of 2011 BRAJESH KUMAR @ KARAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010 under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act was registered on the basis of self statement of A.S.I. of above stated Police Station. Petitioner is named in the first information report and it is stated that he with the help of other accused killed his wife Ritu Singh. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had solemnized his love marriage with the deceased and the deceased had belonged to upper caste community whereas petitioner is a member of Scheduled Caste. It is further contended by him that the above stated love marriage was not liked by the family members of the deceased and subsequently, the family members of the deceased in collusion with Sujit Singh, who happens to be Mausera brother of the deceased, committed the murder of the deceased and taking in collusion, the local police lodged this false case against the petitioner. It is also pointed out by him that after the alleged occurrence, it is the petitioner, who informed about the incident to the Police Station. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as 2 well as submissions of the parties, particularly, this aspect of the matter that none has seen the actual killing of the deceased and except the so-called confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against him, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ashutosh Khetan, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )