IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.6500 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 6.10.2010 Krishan Goenka. ....... Petitioner. Versus Jayanti Parkash Goenka and others. ....... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Shri G.C.Sahapuri, Advocate for the petitioner. .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. The present revision petition is directed against order dated 26.7.2010 vide which Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri has declined the prayer of the petitioner to get the signatures of late Shri Nand Kishore Goenka compared and put the report of the expert to the witnesses of the defendants-respondents. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, I am of the opinion that there is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The petitioner, who has come to the Court on the basis of a Will, had a right to produce evidence in support of his case. Having not C.R. No.6500 of 2010 (O&M) -2- .... done so, he now wants to get examined the signatures of late Shri Nand Kishore Goenka and to put the report of the expert in the cross-examination of the witnesses of the defendants-respondents. Since the petitioner failed to lead evidence in affirmative, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. However, the petitioner has a right to lead evidence in rebuttal. Therefore, he may approach the Court below with an appropriate prayer in that regard at proper time. The instant revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed. October 06,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge