IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8397 of 2008. Decided on: 29th May, 2012. _____________________________________________________ Shakti Saran Parbhakar, S/o Shri Gurucharan Dass Parbhakar, R/o House No. 842/3 Amarpur, Nahan, presently serving as P.A. in the I.P.H. and PWD, State Workshop (Nahan Foundry), Nahan, Distt. Sirmaur. ………….Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through the Secretary (PWD) with hqrs. at Shimla. 2. The Engineer in Chief, H.P.P.W.D., U.S. Club, Shimla. 3. The Superintending Engineer, IPH and PWD Circle, State Workshop, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. 4. The Executive Engineer, IPH and PWD State Workshop, Nahan, Distt. Sirmaur. …………Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Rajender Dogra, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record a copy of the calculation made by the respondent-department towards the redressal of grievance of the petitioner. The petitioner has been held entitled to higher pay scale for officiating on the higher post for 23 days. The same now be released to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 29, 2012. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - - 3 -