{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.505 OF 2003 Suresh @ Chandrakant s/o Veershetiappa Bawge PETITIONER VERSUS Shakuntala w/o Suresh @ Chandrakant Bawge & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.G.Rodge, Advocate for petitioner Mr.U.B.Bilolikar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs.Yogita M.Kshirsagar, APP for respondent No.2 State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 18th December 2009 PER COURT: 1. Learned counsel for petitioner and respondent No.1, states that the parties have settled and matter and accordingly compromise pursis is placed on record, which is marked as “X” for identification. 2. It is mentioned in the said compromise deed that the petitioner has paid Rs.80,000/- to respondent No.1 towards full and final settlement of maintenance amount. In para 4 of the said compromise deed, it is stated that it is agreed between the parites {2} that the petitioner will file divorce petition to which respondent No. 1 will consent for the decree of divorce. 3. It is urged that as now the matter is settled between the parties, the writ petition be disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at. 4. As the parties have arrived at the settlement, for which they have filed compromise deed before the Court and the Court has also accepted the same. Apart from the compromise, the payment towards full and final settlement of the maintenance amount is already paid by the petitioner to respondent No.1, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the compromise deed dated 14.12.2009. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/cwp505-03