IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T)No. 5839 of 2008 Date of decision: 4.8.2010 Hari Singh Hans .. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & Another …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The application was filed before the Tribunal with the following reliefs:- “(ii) That the Respondents 1 and 2 may kindly be ordered to conduct an inquiry in the matter immediately and Respondent No.2 may also be ordered to conduct an inquiry immediately into the allegations made in this petition and struck off the names of the persons who have got their names registered in the District of Lauhal & Spiti illegally and Respondents 1 and 3 may also be asked not to offer employment to such like candidates.” 2 2. In the reply at paragraphs 3 and 4, it is stated as follows: “3. That the original application is not maintainable in the present form as the applicant has not challenged any specific order by which he is feeling aggrieved. It is submitted that the Department of education only sends the requisition to the concerned Employment Exchanges according to vacancy position to sponsor the names of the eligible candidates for interview. The names of the candidates are registered by the Employment Exchange of the concerned area. It is further submitted that the interviews for the various categories of C&V were held by the District Education Officer(Keylong) w.e.f. 19.04.1999 to 29.04.1999. The requisition was sent to the Distt. Employment Exchange, Keylong and on the receipt of the names sponsored by the Employment Exchange the call letters were issued to the candidates for interview. 4. That the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Tribunal is not disputed.” 2. In view of the reply as above, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the Government, in which case the Government will duly consider the matter with notice to the petitioner and appropriate action will be 3 taken in accordance with law within another four months. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 4, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (GR/Vt) Judge.