1N THv tm‘H COURT OF JUDICz-m JRE Ar“ BLLASPUR (Via T1$GARH, / VJ. P. N0. Q 3 GF 26G?) PETITIONER {K/Imod Prasad Gupta, v/o f /’ X» RadhamohaVl Pd Gupta f ‘, ’\\%n. g aged about years R/o ‘ House No.350,ward No.5, Dhimrapur, Dist. Raigarh Chhattisgarh. . State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Commercial Tax (Excise), Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan Raipur \Chha tlsgarh) Commissioner (EXcise), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) . Collector (Excise) District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) District EXCise Officer Raigarh (Chnattisgarh CLE 926 OF' THE W R RIT PEWL‘ION JNDF {.VRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ' ORDERS: Petitioners above-named most respectfully submit as under: lSg PARTICUIARS OF TEE PETITIONEIé ' N AF ,f/ As mentioned in the Cause Title abgyea' n, 7- it _ , " z . 1‘ L/ XI-HC—-78 maugmlgg m 200 H&wum$(§%§mg) «mwmew :gmwfs‘am Wm T§Qim Hmamamha kaifmm Division Bench ' Hon‘bie Shri whn‘rendra Misma, & Hen’hle $hn RM. Ghandrakar JJ {0 11 0/201 0: Common order. passed se parately in W.P.No.649/O3, Krishna Kumar Ujjaine Vs. State of CG and 0th s. including this petition. Signed and dated Howe er, while dictating the order‘ it was noticed that the issues involved in W.P‘f\ 05.1 1 T6/O3‘ 1573/03 & 1536/03 are entirely different. therefore. the aforesaid cases are hereby delinked / Sd/— / Sd/— \DHmENDRAmsHRA if: u CHANDRAKAR I v ‘ 1 xx Judge '1 :i’k Judge i ; 3");