abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 66 OF 2008 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 950 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 836 OF 1999 Rajendra Pratap Gupta .. Petitioner V/s Eena Shyamlal Teckchandani .. Respondent Mr.S.H. Mishra for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 28TH APRIL 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. The office note discloses that the petition is barred by limitation. There are also two other office objections, on account of which the review petition is still on the lodging number. 2. Notice of Motion No.402 of 2009 taken out by the petition for condonation of delay in filing of the review petition has been withdrawn by the petitioner today. As such, the delay is not condoned. The review petition is therefore barred by limitation and is dismissed as barred by limitation. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)