IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24496 of 2008 SINGHESHWAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.7.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement of one of the eye witness was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which he has named some persons but not the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Singheshwar Mahto is directed to surrender before the A.C.J.M.Lakhisarai within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.Lakhiksarai in connection with Halsi P.S.Case no.22 of 2004 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)