Criminal Misc.-M No. 26453 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 26453 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.10.2011 Ladi Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Gurbir Singh Toor, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …. RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing notice of motion on 1.9.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on account of party faction in the village. It is alleged that the petitioners on behest of certain panchayat members of the gram panchayat had demolished the wall. The complainant was also one of the panches of the gram panchayat. He was not eye witness to the occurrence as the FIR was got registered by him in terms of the facts disclosed to him by one Gurmail Singh alias Mela. He further submitted that no one had suffered injury even though it was suggested in the FIR that Bachan Kaur, who was supervising constructions of wall, was beaten up.” Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have already joined investigation. Criminal Misc.-M No. 26453 of 2011 2 The aforesaid fact is confirmed by learned counsel for the State on instructions from Head Constable Balwinder Singh. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the petitioners on 1.9.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 03.10.2011 sharmila