1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Criminal Writ Petition No.2730 of 2008 Vilas Rasiklal Shah & anr. Petitioners Vs. The Senior Inspector of Police, Panchavati Police Station, Nashik & anr. Respondents With Criminal Writ Petition No.2731 of 2008 Rajendra Rasiklal Shah Petitioner Vs. The Senior Inspector of Police, Panchavati Police Station, Nashik & anr. Respondents Mr.R.D.Soni i/b. M/s.Ram & Co. for petitioners in both the petitions. Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, APP for State in both the petitions. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN S. DALVI,JJ. August 3, 2009. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr.Soni, the learned counsel for the petitions in both the petitions and we have noticed that C.R. No. 152/2006 came to be registered on 5/5/2006 pursuant to the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, First Class 2 at Nashik on 13/4/2006 in a private complaint and, therefore, the investigation has been set in motion as per the order of the competent Court. On completion of such an investigation a report is required to be filed by the Investigating Officer in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class. Hence the petitioners may have a remedy to appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class and if any charge-sheet is filed, they may either apply for discharge or apply for quashing of the case. 2. We do not find any reasons to entertain these petitions at this stage and if any of the petitioner have applied for anticipatory bail, undoubtedly such applications will be decided on their on merits. The petitions are disposed as withdrawn. (SMT.ROSHAN S. DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)