IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.4329 of 2010 Date of Decision:13.12.2011 Gurdev Singh and others .....Petitioners Vs. Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. H.K. Brinda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.P.S. Thethi, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for respondent No.11. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioners have been promoted on the basis of seniority, which is subject matter of challenge and their seniority has been refixed whereas learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not been given benefit of deemed seniority. In view of he submission made by learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 that the seniority of the petitioners has been refixed and the petitioners have been promoted on the basis of refixed seniority, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having rendered infructuous. However, in case the petitioners are still aggrieved by any action of the respondents, they are at liberty to challenge the same by moving representation with regard to the seniority from the back date and the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass a necessary order in accordance with law. December 13, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE