IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 276 OF 2009 ESPERDIAO RODRIGUES ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH STATE SECRETARY AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Addl. Government Advocate for respondnets no. 1, 2 and 5. Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for respondents no. 3, 4 and 6. Mr. G. Teles, Advocate for respondents no. 7. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 28th April, 2009 P.C. The matters are being considered by this Court since long. Petitioner in Writ Petition no. 276/2009 has contended that action for demolition of his structure is initiated only because of the efforts made by him to remove the illegal structure of respondents no. 7 and 8 and attempts made by him therein to show the collusion between the Sarpanch/Panchas of Village Panchayat of Carmona. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 7 has contended that there are no malafides in the matter and the structure raised by him is not illegal at all. Learned Counsel appearing for Village Panchayat has tried to refute the allegations of the malafides and bias and has contended that the decisions on behalf of Panchayat are being implemented through Sarpanch. He has also contended that the notices were issued under the signatures of Sarpanch and this was the practice being followed everywhere in State. After noticing the error, the same has been rectified and after withdrawing earlier notices issued by the Sarpanch, the proper notices signed by the Secretary have been issued. 2. Though, the learned Counsels have tried to assail the actions taken against the interest of their respective clients, at this stage, we find ourselves unable to pronounce anything finally. Accordingly, on the last date of hearing, parties were informed that first action pending since long against the structure of respondents no. 7 and 8 be completed in time bound manner and thereafter, the action against the structure of petitioner in Writ Petition no. 276/2009 be completed in time bound fashion. 3. Today, upon instructions respective Counsels agree to the arrangement. Hence, without recording any finding in relation to points in dispute, we direct respondents no. 3 and 4 i.e. the Secretary, Village Panchayat of Carmona and the Sarpanch, Village Panchayat of Carmona to complete the action in relation to alleged illegal/unauthorised structure of respondents no. 7 and 8 by end of June 2009. The consideration of action and action if any, in relation to alleged unauthorised action of petitioner in Writ Petition no. 276/2009 shall be completed in the next period of two months by 31.8.2009. 4. The adverse orders passed against parties or final notices can be challenged by aggrieved parties in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. 5. In view of this arrangement, as the action has been initiated by Village Panchayat afresh against these structures, the notices impugned in the present petitions do not survive. Consequently, the proceedings in appeal filed by respondent no. 7 before the Additional Director of Panchayat is also rendered infructuous and the same is disposed off. 6. Writ Petitions are disposed of as above with no order as to costs. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. *am/-