IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 10200 of 2011(Y) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MANDAKINI, AGED 34, W/O.LENIN, ARANGATH HOUSE,VADANAPALLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD SRI.SAJU J PANICKER SRI.LIJO KURIAN JOSE RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE C DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN -695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, THRISSUR .PIN -680001 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY NO.V, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, THRISSUR .PIN -680020. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER VADANAPALLY VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD,THRISSUR, PIN -680 506. 5. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES THRISSUR BRANCH REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PIN- 680 020. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN R5 BY ADV.SRI.M.L.SAJEEV, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.10200/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 04/12/2009 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 04/12/2009 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P3 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 04/12/2009 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P4 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 04/12/2009 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P5 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09/01/2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. P6 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15/12/2009 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P7 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 02/01/2010 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P8 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 08/02/2010 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE HON'BLE MINISTER FOR REVENUE TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND. P9 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19/07/2010 FROM THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P10 COPY OF THE RECEIPTS SHOWING THE RECENT PAYMENT OF THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND DURING OCTOBER & NOVEMBER 2010. P11 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02/02/2011 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER HUSBAND. P12 COPY OF THE WRIT PETITION (CRL)NO.131/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT WITHOUT EXHIBITS. P13 COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE DOCTORS OF THE CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 10200 OF 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a defaulter in payment of kuri instalments to the 5th respondent Kerala State Financial Enterprises. The 5th respondent initiated revenue recovery proceedings through the other respondents, which is under challenge in this writ petition. This Court passed three interim orders in this writ petition as follows; On 11.4.2011, “There will be an interim stay against further steps of recovery pursuant to Exts.P1 to P7 notices provided the petitioner remits a total sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) in two equal instalments falling due on or before 30-4-11 and on or before 25-5-11. Post on 30.5.11.” On 30.5.2011, “Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the writ petition as well as the present I.A to the standing counsel for KSFE. Show the name of Adv. M.L. Sajeev in the cause list. Post day after tomorrow”. and On 1.6.2011. “I.A.No.7473/2011. The prayer for extension of time stipulated for compliance of the interim order is opposed. Considering the facts narrated in the accompanying affidavit, petitioner is directed to make payment of a sum of Rs.2.5 lakh on W.P.(C)No.10200/11 2 or before 30.6.2011. Post the I.A. for further consideration on 4.7.2011”. The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the interim orders have not been complied with. 2. In the above circumstances, insofar as the liability is not disputed by the petitioner, I am not inclined to further extend the discretionary jurisdiction of this Court to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.10200/11 3 W.P.(C)No.10200/11 4