IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2007 / 23RD ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 30325 of 2007(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SRI.M.G.HARIHARAN, ASST. ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR SMT.C.B.SUMA DEVI SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE. R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/10/2007, THE COURT ON 15/10/2007 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.30325 of 2007 .................................................................... Dated this the 15th day of October, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner currently working as a Sub Engineer is aggrieved by the fact that the provisional seniority list as evidenced by Ext.P4 has not been finalised so far. He had filed his objections to Exts.P4 and P4(a) which is dated 6.2.2003. The petitioner is due to retire on 31.12.2007. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for the first respondent and the learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent, W.P. is disposed of directing the first respondent to look into Ext.P7 and take a decision thereon to see that the provisional list published as per Exts.P4 and P4(a) is finalised. Needful shall be done by the first respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If petitioner's claim is found to be acceptable, then necessary remedial action should be taken keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner is due to retire on 31.12.2007. V.GIRI Judge pms