1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 434 of 2006 Geeta Bharat Kewlani & ors. .. Petitioners versus Mahendra Mirchandani .. Respondent ... Ms.Asmita Sali i/b M/s.Khaitan & Jayakar for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjay Jain i/b M/s.Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 6th May 2009 P.C.: 1. Learned counsel for the parties hand in the consent terms. Consent terms are signed by petitioner nos.1 and 2 both of whom are present in the court and are identified by their advocate. They admit the consent terms. Consent terms are also signed by respondent who is personally present in the 2 court. He states that he is unable to see. He states that the consent terms have been explained to him by the Associate and he has understood them and have signed them after understanding them. Respondent is identified by his advocate. 2. Consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. There shall be order in terms of the consent terms. In view of paragraph no.4 of the consent terms, petition stands withdrawn and disposed off. (D.G. KARNIK, J)