IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2010 / 23RD ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22004 of 2010(A) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- P.K.SUDARSAN, PANDIKADAVIL HOUSE, PARAMBIL.P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 012. BY ADVS. SRI.P.P.JACOB, SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE PANTHEERANKAVE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BAK LTD NO.2110, PANTHEERANKAVE, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 019, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(G) PUTHIYARA, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 004. R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.22004 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has been working as an Accountant in the service of the first respondent bank from 1.6.2009 onwards. As per Ext.P1 dated 29.6.2009, the first respondent directed that the petitioner be reverted to the post of Senior Clerk for the reason that the Internal Auditor is reverted to the post of Accountant. Consequently, due to lack of vacancy, the petitioner is directed to be reverted. 2. According to the petitioner, the Society is a Class-I Credit Society entitled to four posts of Accountants. Therefore, reversion of the Internal Auditor to one of the posts of the Accountant need not automatically result in reversion of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the bank has not filled up the other posts of Accountants, though there are four posts. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 before the second respondent challenging the impugned action by which he is sought to be reverted. In wpc No.22004/2010 2 view of the threat of reversion faced by the petitioner, it is submitted that Ext.P3 may be directed to be disposed of expeditiously. 3. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for the second respondent. In view of the limited relief that I propose to grant, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the first respondent. 4. In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 submitted by the petitioner to the second respondent, as expeditiously as possible and to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing all interested parties. Pending final disposal of Ext.P3, all further action to revert the petitioner from the post of Accountant shall be kept in abeyance. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE css/