SWGCS :-""\f ^ ? ym^t •^Aufi' jpAGE^No^-.s^ ,-J > ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^' (CHHATISGARH) y/...„„„„„...„„ S;?' / WRIT PETITION f227) N0.: 72009 S.B. / -^ ^//^/ s ^?^^ 5y PETITIONER: - ^ .? Non-Applicant % Jfl ^Jy/ Chowa Lal Chandl-a^ar. S/0 1-ate Shri Ramdtian Chandrakar, By Profession- Cultivator/ Farmer, R/G -yillage- Kowajhar, Tahsil- Mahasamund, Distt. -Mahasamund [C.G.] : VE RSU^: RESPONDENTS: -^ 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Revenue-Department,D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] 2. The Board Of Revenue, Board at Raipur, -DJstt. Raipur [C.G.] ' ^ 3. The Additional Commjssiorier, Rai p u r Divisjon, Raipii r [C . G. ] §1 ^JiiitctT' -: WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2270F THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA FOR THE ISSUANCEOF THE DIRECTION fS), or ORDER rST:- 11 11-1 <^ HIGH COURtOFCHHAtTISGARHATBlLASPUR SinateBencfuHon'bteStirtJusticePrashantKumaFMishra PETn-tONER RESPQNDENTS WntPetitiorif227lNo. 1748 / 2009 ChCTflratjalChandrakar Vefsus ^teofChhaUl^arhandothers. ShriJ.A. Lohani.counsel fortlie petitioneF, Shri VinodTekam, Panel 1-awyerforthe State/respohdentNo. 1 &3. WRlTPETItlONUNDERARTICl.E2270FTHECONSTffUTIONOF ;::W1^1/:;:;;^,:;'...:...-^ •'.'.^.^ ORAl.ORDER (13.12.2010) The peUtioner has preferred the petiflon undet Aittete 22Z of the Cons tionoflrKttaseeldngt|uashment<(fttieorder<teted46/04QO(?2and 08^05/2002 pas^ttytheAdditiona(Com(niSSK>ner,ftaipurl3nflsioh. C2) Rrom tb|:cl!B<:;u(nie^^ tt^ proc^edings Under tWe^^iliTO W Agr^ was injtiated against the petitipner. The Competent Authority passed (inal order on06 aune, 1980 holding thafthepBtitionefsfatherhotds 31.30 acres^o^ surplus land. The Competent Authority thereafter opened the matter again on the basis of report by the Superirtendent land records (Gei^^ concluded that the petitioner does not hold any surplus land. ^ Tlle Additioinal Qoinmi^ioner, l^ipur I^sion inffi^ revision proceedi»^ynderASectiCTi42of^^ to fte Act,19 ^ aiwl|Sh(W^uae^|oti(^^sis^ 2W^992Cten^reF^. tnthftwder^t^ vffltpe^onAdditionalCOmmis^or^hasgbservedthatJn^ lopportunitytt^ff^Qnerh^rK^fif^^ 2, ^•> andinthisviewtrfthematterthepeWoner^^re^ainedfrom^nteringinto any transaction or (noving any application forcorrectton of recorris pertaining to the lands in qy^ion. TOe peMionCT (Anhexure P^, howeveronsthel^sof^^itKinalCp^ orderdated 1^)4/2002. ametTiowasissuedtott^^^ on08 May,2002^ichisatpage25ofthewrtt^p^ to have moved an applit^onfpTva^r^ofthesaidm him beforetheBQardofR^^uetTouffivei'flieBoaKtofReventredeclioedto entsrtairi the applieatron CTi^e re^ befbreitwhen^tneofficeof^romss^ OfficeoftheGommissionerl^tieenre-e^titjsl^ttiema^ be referred to the Additiorial Commisstoner for a^jMdJcation. r •..•"..'.••":. •;. ' '. •• ~ •.•" ; •' (4) Frora th®chB>no|ogyi|M^iiora^^Ra^e^ ^1he;a^^ Act; 196Q wou app^that^^ beftTCfteAdditioraieoinmissionerlnexereis&ttffK)^ the Act, 1960. In thesaid procejKling hottces ^re j$stJS!d 'tQ ttie^etroonerwi :28^1992.11; ;:..,.•.:•:: '.'- @ In view of pendency of the proGeedinflS^^^b^^ Commissionersinc®lastmbreWan18year8^thiswnt^pe^^^^^^ v^hadirectJ<mtotheAclditiohalGommissicmeF,R^|MiFl3^ the proGeedingsundeFSectj6n42oftheAct,19TOm^ Cau^Notlcea(^instthepetitioneron28^)9f199^^nexureP/3),aseari^ as possible and Rreferably^^in^ peTlc^offt^^nth^^ presentatioRofcertiflSclfiopy^QfllifeOKler, (6) hto order as to coste. Sd//- PrashantKumarMishra TJudge "•T^ ,AJ3EJ-/