Regular Second Appeal No. 3196 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 3196 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.1.2009 *** Paramjit Singh Appellant VS. Harnek Singh & Ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. R.S. Athwal, Advocate. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction against the respondent-defendants, but lost concurrently before the two Courts below. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and have perused the paper book carefully. The very genesis of the case of the plaintiff i.e. agreement/ compromise dated 5.10.1999 was found to be un-registered one and it was held that the plaintiff cannot derive any benefit from the same. Admittedly, the plaintiff delivered the possession of the suit property to defendant- respondent No.1, who further sold the same in favour of defendant- respondent No.2, but the said sale-deed was not challenged by the plaintiff. Even in the earlier suit filed by the plaintiff compromise dated 5.10.1999 was disbelieved and the suit was dismissed. All these facts rightly took the Courts below to conclude that compromise dated 5.10.1999 has no legal sanctity and the plaintiff is not entitled for the relief claimed. Nothing has been shown by learned counsel for the appellant to take a contrary view. No ground is made out to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below. No substantial question of law, which is sine qua Regular Second Appeal No. 3196 of 2008 2 non for admission of appeal is made out. The appeal is wholly without merits and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE January 12,2009 Jiten