HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3170 OF 2011 ORDER: Plaintiff is the petitioner herein. This revision is directed against the orders passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge at Khammam in I.A.No.107 of 2011, which is moved by the respondents who are the defendants in the suit. The respondents herein were found by the Court as not cooperating in completing the evidence on their side. Therefore, the Court seemed to have passed an order on 03.12.2010 subject to certain conditions and terms contained therein. That was also not complied with and hence the suit was posted for arguments of the parties. At that stage, present I.A.No.107 of 2011 has been moved to receive the document, which is at page no.20 of the paper book filed in the writ petition. It is a communication sent up by the plaintiff addressing the first defendant in the suit intimating the balance amount of Rs.6,563/- outstanding as payable as on 31.08.2004. 2. Learned Judge has assigned the reason for allowing the I.A, as only with a view to provide an opportunity, the I.A. was allowed. 3. Heard Sri M. Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the plaintiff is a very big company having establishments at various places in the country and consequently maintains its books of accounts very carefully and to avoid any overlapping of transactions or events, it meticulously follows a code system, by which it can become immediately clear as to the office or establishment where from the transaction is generated. In the instant case, document sought to be marked by the respondent bearing the code No.408. Hence, the learned counsel submits that code No.408 has no connection whatsoever with the suit claim. 4. I am afraid, this is not a place where this contention can be appreciated. This contention is very much available to the plaintiff to be urged before the Trial Court. It is for the Trail Court to take the same into account and consideration. 5. However, what I observe is that the suit is instituted as long back as in the year 2003. It is rather sad that it has not been allowed to be completed so far, for one reason or the other. Therefore, the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge at Khammam is directed to take all such steps and measures required to dispose of the suit O.S.No.5 of 2003 within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, it being an old suit. 6. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with this order at the admission stage. _____________________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao 09-09-2011 SP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3170 OF 2011 09-09-2011 SP