[N PETITIONERS (é’ WRIT PETITION (PIL) No. 4331 of2007 : 1. Mrs. Shanti Sahu W/o. Pyare Lal Sahu, aged‘ about 50 years, Occupation — Panch, Gram Panchayat Tulsi, Village — Tulsi, P.S. Simga, District — aipur (C.G.) . Rama Venna S o Firtu Verma, aged about 55 years, Occu tion ~ Panch, Gram Panchayax Tulsi, R/o Village Tulsi, RS. Simga, District Raiyur G.) .Ash Dewangan S/o Bhakalu Dewangan, awed about 43 years, Occupation ~ Up- Saxpanch, Gram Panchayat Tulsi, R/o. Viliage Tulsi, P.S. Simga, District Raipur, (C.G.) . Khelawan S/o Manoo Yadav, aged about‘45 years, Occupation —- Agiculture and Labourer, R/o Village Tulsi: P.S. Simga, District — Raipm (C.G.) VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Shastri Chawk, Raipur. . Ram Khilawan Turkane aged about 45 yrs. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Tulsi, RIO Vitlage Tulsi, P.S. Simga, Distt. — Raipur (CG). . Avinash Das aged — 44 yrs. Member of Nagar Panchayat, Simga, Distt — Raipur (C.G.) .Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Simga, Distt —— Raipur (C.G.) . Bhagbali S10 Purushottam, aged about 38 yrs, Occupation — Contractor, R/o Vilage — Raweli, Tahsil — Bemetara, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) 6. ChiefConservator ofForest, Raipur (C.G.) 7. Divisional Forest Officer, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) x RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR‘ o . \a/ WRIT PETITION PIL UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Coram : Hon’ble Shri Jagdish Bhaua. Acting ChiefJustke & Hon’me Sim map Emmi; Deshmnkh, J. Present: Shn' H.B.Agrawa1: Senior Advocate with Shn' Sudhir Velma, Advocate for the petitioners. r Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1, 4, 6 and 7. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13a; day of September, 2007) The following order of the Coun was passed by Hon’ble Jagdish Bhalla, Acting C‘J.: We have heard learned counsel for the parties. There is an agreement on one issue between thepanies that 195 trees have been fallen by respondent. No. 5, Shri Bhagbali. Without making any comments, as the matter may be subjudice before the Court of law, as neither ofthe party is in a I position to state as to whether the respondent No. 5 has tiled any appeal against his ‘ conviction, the State/Government shall implant more plants in’accordanee with the (Erovermnent notifications. A fair statement has been made by the Government .[eounsel that against faliingv of 195 trees, 975 (195 X 5 = 975) trees shall he r implanted. In light ofthe above statement made by the learned counsel for the State, this petition stands disposed of. ..... / Sd/- l i I Sd-/ Acting Chief Justice Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge