IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:9987 of 2005 Between: A.S. Pagdi, S/o. Late Setu Madhava Rao Pagdi, R/o. H.No. 5-25/B, Vivekananada Nagar, Road No.8/25-A, Habsiguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. byits Principal Secretary, Agriculture & Co-operation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Limited, Rep. by its Liquidator, appointed by the State Government, Rashtrapathi Road, Secunderabad. 3 The Sale Officer, The Prudential Cooperative Urban Bank Limited, Rashtrapathi Road, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.NARENDER The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “Under the above facts and circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to auction my house bearing No.5-25/B, Road No.8/25-A, situated at Vivekananda Nagar, Habsiguda, Hyderabad is as arbitrary, contrary to law and unconstitutional and also in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the direct the respondents Bank to receive the amount from the Petitioner under one time settlement (OTS) scheme framed by the Bank and the Government.” At the hearing, Sri C.Narender, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of this submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2008. kvni