%MH *wi Xl-HC—78 WAHM f—~v n ur m wniai , 111,200 mmmw ammamas anésiqazs (W) > A mmmanéet 359—2305 The pa?i*’rioner has pre‘ 227 0f “rha Cmsfifufion of l rmé carréc‘mass of ?he order Civii Judge, (Jessi, burg, wh€ Durg had rejecfet} ‘i'he appiica‘ 38 Ru‘e 5 of fha C.P.C. for a’r'h JF'nm‘ We Cour‘r was rm‘f sm‘ pe‘fmoner herein 'w‘haf resp: proparw in ardgr 1’0 defect? 1‘? passed agaimsf respondems he T; have heard ieamed c pefi‘rior], maferial cmd Jihz imp ’ihe appiica‘iion (Annexure-P/ CEC. fha‘? defendant N91 ha is preparimg T’ar disposing m: forced #0 make paymem of paseed agaims’r him, #herefg menTioned m ”the appiicca’r Respmdenm herein m ‘fheir omsfcmdi‘ng agaim’s‘r Mm and men‘rioned 'in ‘rhe. Wam#'1%étm $Wanéa1 1 Shri Amp Mujumciar, co unsei “for The pe‘ii‘rianerx Ferred “‘rhis wri’r pE'fiTion under ArTicie qdia quasw‘iomiwg ”mg $egaih‘y, proprie‘ry da'fed 22-7-2005 gassed by The Firs+ :r‘eby kamed Hrs? Civil Judge, CEass-E, :‘ian fiied by f’ne peTiTioner under Order achmam‘ before judgmen’r (m fha ground sfiead wi’riq fha mafaria! Wed by ‘Fha ndam's are Eikaiy f0 dispose m: The 2 decree uhimm‘ely which is going f0 be Fem. ounsei for ihe pe‘riiioner, perused ihe ned arder. If has been mem‘ioned in -) fiied Lmder Order 38 Rule 5 m‘ “rhe dosed businese of merchandiee aha! he ‘ he shop and building so i'hdi’ he is mi The decree, which is ’ui’rima‘ieiy ’ro he e, ii ishecessary Thai ihe buiidihg on be ai'iached before judgmehi. repiy have sicx’red iha‘i‘ no umoun‘i is the building which ihe pei‘iiioner has v ‘f\ a g o‘rherwise, fha‘r fhe defendan‘ gxecufioh of my decree ‘E’hu‘f’ r (a) is abouf fo disp proper‘i’ytor (b) i$ abou'r 1‘s remav from fhe iacal Hm 1"ne Cour‘r may direc‘r produce and place prope Therefore, in order +0 piace same ma'rerial befare 1‘} are abou‘i 1‘0 dispose of irhe pr r, wh‘h im‘em‘ To obs‘rruc’r of“ delay lhe my be paseecl agains‘i’ him, )se of irhe whole or any pam‘ of his a ihe whole or' any par? of his proper-W H's of ihe jurisdicfion of The Cour‘r, ihe defendan‘l To furnish securi‘i’y, To “Ty cf fhe disposal of The Court safisfy The Cour? fhe plaii’ififf has To ‘ 1e Cour? which shows Tho‘f defemlan‘is periy. Perusol of ihe above opplicofion shows ThaT The peTiTioner h s noT been able To make ouT o case whereby fhe CourT is scd'isfi d fho’r ihe respondem's are abou? Tom dispose of ’rhe groper’fy ih or er To defeaT execuTioh of The decree V which is likely To he passed og insT him. Mere apprehension connoT be made o basis. The peTiTione is required To saTisfy The CourT by \ 3"”:Sf2005 ~ 20,000 mmqi$ , ..... . .......... "nup- W20 maimmyfaaa) 0 mamm mamma Wmaw‘mmn ammam w&;_ aammst - i3 no shop in Thi£ building, as such The appiica’fion be rejecfed. As has -\'\V x been menfioned‘abave, fhe Tri xi Ceum‘ has rejec‘fed The applicafion of The pe’ri‘tiwer an The gmLmd ma“? ‘rhe Cour? is noT sa’fisfied WHh we affidavif r’Hed by The pwifione r. Rule 5 of Order 38 of The C.P.C. emvisages fha? “(1) Wheranf any smge of a suit n‘he Cour? is safisfied, by affidavi'r or' ‘ .’ gg 1mm amiai mzoo . . ...... .. ...... . ........