IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4691 of 2008. Decided on: 02.08.2010. __________________________________________________________ Kamla Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : None. For the Respondents. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 to the post of Kahar-cum-Sweeper in Government Primary School Bharli, Tehsil Paonta, District Sirmour, H.P. The case of the respondents, in a nutshell, is that the petitioner appeared for interview alongwith respondent No.4 before the duly constituted Selection Committee. I have perused the select list. The petitioner secured 17.5 marks and respondent No.4 has been awarded 20 marks, under various categories as per the Scheme. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.4 has been 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - adjusted by the duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. Moreover, no malafide has been alleged against the members of the Selection Committee. 2. Consequently, there is no merit in the petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. The respondents are further directed that in future the select list shall be displayed on the notice board at least for a period of three weeks to enable the candidates to acquire knowledge about their marks. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. August 02, 2010. (sck).