IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28223 of 2008 RAVI @ RAVI SHANKAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 02.09.2008 Heard. The father of victim, whose statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. has been copied in paragraph no. 33 of the case diary, is the informant alleging that this petitioner in connivance with his wife, i.e., mother of daughter and son, kidnapped them. The defence is that the wife of the informant, that is, the mother of the lady Puja Kumari had got her daughter married to the present petitioner and there was no occurrence of kidnapping or abduction. The young lady appears making a statement as indicated above under section 164 Cr.P.C. and she alleged of forcible kidnapping of herself, her mother and her little brother Rohit Raj and thereafter her confinement and rape. The doctor has found signs of rape upon the lady. Might be that the lady could be above 18 – 19 years of age in the face of her clear statement, I do not find it a case for grant of bail to the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. pkj (Dharnidhar Jha, J)