IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No.143 of 2005 Parag Aggarwal …Petitioner Versus State and another …Respondents Dated:16-04-2010 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. List has been revised. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. I have heard learned A.G.A. for respondent no. 1. I have seen the complaint and perused the other material available on record. I am of the view that entire material needs assessment of the evidence which is to be collected by the trial judge during the course of the trial. In the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry with regard to the accusation of the petitioner at this stage specially under the circumstances when the evidence is still incomplete and hazy. I do not find any abuse of process of court in this case and no flagrant injustice is caused to the petitioner. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. The interim stay order, if any, stands vacated. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) SP