IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATVRE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO.(48^0F 2005 PETITIONER/ DEFENDANT / Mukesh Khemam, S/o Shri Pokar Das Khemam, Partner, M/S. A.R. Drinks, R/o Opposite Durga Maiidir., Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.). Versus RESPONDENT/ / 1 PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS/ /2 DEFEN7DANTS .,M w / ^ 47 ^' ^§%^ "^ss^^^^ BankofBaroda, Through Manager, Main Branch, Raipiir at Mahavir Goushala Complex, Modhapara, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.). M/S A.R. Drinks, Partnership firm registered under tbe Indian Partaership Act 1932, Netaji Chowk, Shyam Nagar Road, Katora Talab, Raipiir, Tahsil aad District Raipur (C.G.). Shri Rajesh Veera, S/o Shri Lakfamasi Veera, Partner, M/S A.R. Drinks, R/o Street No.4, Fafadih, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.). Kamlesh Khemani, S/o Pokar Das Kliemam, R/o Infront of Durga Maadir, Katora Talab, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). Pokar Das Khemani, R/o lufroiit of Durga Mandir, Katora Talab, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipiu- (C.G.). ^) 6. Lakhmashi Naiiji Veera, S/o Late Shri Nan Ji Veera, Through Adarsh Guest House, M.G. Road, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 ^n^r^r ^ri^w^r ^ri^F^Tfer Gowri ^ 3^ ;:^TT^R, ^Tfi^^Ko, fa^ll^y 3i <^i Ms<cn _..^;^.^A[°^ N^dl**<ich'*'v<r"v*<<~p<>'"r"f*^ 200 fcR^S 1 w -3TI^T?^IRR:^feT Ghi<l<T<n<ift<i ^Hcnslt^te:^><^i<^i< ^^Tl^TTCTiRT 18-4-2005 Shri Hari Shankar Patet, c4unselfor the petitioner. Heard on I.A.No.2822/20^5 for exemption from filing the eertified copy of Annexure-P/1. Shri Patei, learned counstl for the petitioner submits that earlier civtl revision was preferred by the| petitioner before this Court againstthe impugned order dated 15-1-2001 KAnnexure-P/1) herein anct certifled copy or the sald order has been nied aKtngwith that case. Uncier the circumstancesl the apptlcatlon (t.A.No.2822/2005) is atlowed and the petitioner is ex^mpted from flling the certffled oopy of Annexure-P/1. Heard. The instant petition is pref€|rredunder Articte 227 ofthe Constitution of tndia chaltenges the order <pated 15-1-2001 passed by the Vtth Additional District Judge, RaipurJ in civil suit No.6~A/2000, whereby the Court declined to give opportunity|to fead evidence, A bare perusat of the rec^rd, it reveals that the Court below has mentioned the opportunities whictjt have been given priorto passing ofthe orderdated 15-1-2001. !n view of the above, no ca| under Article 227 of the Constitutl raise the grounds in appeal, if so se te made out for exercise ofjurisdiction ion of India, hcwever, the petitioner may desire. If such grounds are raised in an appeat the same shalt be conside^ed in accordance with law. With the aforeeaid obsen/ajtions the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.).P,N|).1150/2005 and I.A.No.2821/2005 also^ stand disposed of <-^ ^-- Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (4i^^(<9^) ^