IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1313 (MS) of 2009 Sri Deepak Kumar Thapliyal …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioner had sought certain information from Information Officer, Rural Development Department. Since the petitioner was not satisfied with the reply received to that information, he moved an appeal. In appeal against certain information, the petitioner was given the information. Consequently though the petitioner dissatisfied filed a second appeal, the Information Commissioner considered the matter and came to the conclusion that the petitioner was satisfied with some information and dissatisfied with the remaining information. It was further view of the Information Commissioner that the information supplied to the petitioner were sufficient and sufficient compliance has been done under the Right to Information Act, 2005. 3. This Court is also of the view that sufficient compliance has been made in the present case by the public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 as has been rightly held by the Uttarakhand Information Commission. No interference is therefore, presently called for. The writ petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 4. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 19.12.2011 Virendra