..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2469 OF 2008 Ravishankar Ramashankar Singh. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.A.T.Lalla, Adv. i/b. Lalla & Lalla for applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 6th August, 2008. DATED : 6th August, 2008. DATED : 6th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.II-03 of 2008 of Nerul Police Station. The said case is under the NDPS Act. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that coaccused Roshan Singh was granted bail by this Court and the case of the applicant is similar to that of Roshan Singh. The learned APP has contended that coaccused Roshan Singh was found in possession of 515 grams of charas and the ..(2).. present applicant who was accompanying the coaccused was found in possession of 997.6 grams of charas. The learned APP has pointed out that the commercial quantity is above 1000 grams. He has submitted that the quantity of the contraband found with the applicant is almost commercial quantity. 4. Looking to the quantity found with the applicant, I find that the case of the applicant is not similar to that of coaccused Roshan Singh who was found in possession of only 515 grams of charas. Though the quantity of the contraband does not fall under the commercial quantity, I am not inclined to grant bail. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)