IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 2ND MAY 2008 / 12TH VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 14005 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. SUHAIR.N.K., S/O.MOHAMMED N.K., CHATHAPARAMBIL, KODIYATHOOR, MUKKAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 602, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. SAJEER.K., S/O.KUTTY HASSAN, KOTTAKADAVATHU, CHERUVADI P.O., MAVOOR-673 661, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAIJU. S SRI.T.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM. BY SC SRI.P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).14005/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner pray for a direction to the University to declare the result of re-valuation of the answer sheets of the petitioners sought for under Exts.P3 and P5. 2. I heard learned Standing Counsel for the University also. 3. In my view, the University should take steps to see that the answer papers of the petitioners are revalued within a time frame. 4. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to complete the re-valuation of the answer papers sought for by the petitioners under Exts.P3 and P5, as early as possible and communicate the results to the petitioners, at any rate, within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C).14005/2008 2 It is made clear that the direction will be operative on condition that both the applications are in the proper format and also in compliance of the formalities prescribed under the regulations. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs