IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.468 of 2008 MANJU DEVI …. Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR AND 2. SACHINDRA SINGH …. Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 3.12.2008. This revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 12th February,2008 passed by Fast Track Court No.V, Samastipur in Cr. Appeal No.81 of 2007/2 of 2007 thereby the court below has converted the conviction of the opposite party from section 365 I.P.C. to section 342 of the I.P.C. and sentenced him to a period already undergone by him, which was more than one year. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order. The grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the court below has not properly appreciated the allegations and evidence and has wrongly converted the conviction of section 365 I.P.C. into section 342 I.P.C. The trial court had rightly convicted the opposite party under section 365 I.P.C. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment. Having regard to the nature of the accusation as well as material available on the record, I am also of the view that the court below has rightly converted the conviction from section 365 I.P.C. to section 342 I.P.C. The sentence under section 342 I.P.C. is one year and the opposite party no.2 had remained in jail custody for more than one year. No case is made out for interference in the impugned order. - 2 - N.H./ Accordingly, this application is rejected. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )