IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3832 of 2011 RITESH KUMAR RAI @ CHHOTU SON OF LATE RAMJEE RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BACHARI P.S. PIRO IN THE DISTRICT OF BHOJPUR….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2. 04.02.2011 The petitioner is in custody in relation to Shahpur P.S. Case No. 151 of 2009 instituted under Sections 394, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report nor was arrested soon thereafter. The allegation is that the informant and his nephew were returning after collecting cash from their bank. They were intercepted and the nephew protested. He was shot died on the spot, the miscreants fled away with the money. It appears that subsequently the three persons who are supposed to be involved in this incident were later arrested by the police, who confessed in another case, in which confessed being involved in the present case. It is submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated, merely because they were implicated in one case and now series of cases, they are being implicated as such his suspense. 2 Be that as it may, petitioner is said to have been identified in the T.I. Parade. I may also get that one of the co accused Munna Rai had came to this Court and his bail was rejected in Cr. Misc.26336 of 2010 by order dated 10.1.2011. With observation that the trial should be expatiated and completed preferably within nine months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to renew for bail. Let similar order be done in the present case. This application is rejected. Devendra/ ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)