IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15761 of 2011 JITAN MISTRY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the prayer portion, inadvertently, in place of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, it has wrongly been mentioned as Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar. He seeks permission to make necessary correction. Permission is accorded. Let the counsel for the petitioner make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the application during course of the day. Taking into consideration that the petitioner is cousin father-in-law of the deceased and admittedly, father- in-law of the deceased has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 10.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5111 of 2011, let the petitioner, namely, Jitan Mistry be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No. 40 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)