IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30696 of 2008 LALAN SAHANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 26.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. of a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and is in custody since 22.2.2008 without being put on the Test Identification Parade. The rejection orders itself indicates that one Rabhuir Yadav had named the petitioner as one of the persons identified by him as amongst the dacoits. The contention is that the said Rabhubir Yadav had also filed a case prior to the present case and in that case the petitioner has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 30693 of 2008 and, as such, the reason is very much apparent for implication by the same man. The further contention is that not being put on the Test Identification Parade nor found in possession of any theft property the petitioner is still languishing in jail. Let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his 2 furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/-( three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Sikrahana in Raxaul P.S.Case No. 170 of 2007. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)