IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Writ Petition No.1430 of 2007 Date of Decision:15.01.2008 Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Renu Bala Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 8. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. Respondent No.5 is present in person in Court and also the detenue- Urmila. She states that factum of her marriage with the petitioner was not disclosed to her parents otherwise she had married with the petitioner and wants to go and live with him. She further states that her parents did not permit her to live and join the company of the petitioner for the reason that they were not in knowledge of the fact that she is married with the petitioner. Respondent No.5, who is present in person in Court states that in case she is willing to live with the petitioner, he has no objection to her living with him. The petitioner had taken the detenue- Urmila from the Court. In view of the stand of the parties, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. January 15, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE