1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAW NO. 1425/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4568 OF 2009 (Sub-Divisional Engineer & Anr. vs. Maroti Amrutrao Bramhankar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 11, 2010. Heard Shri Jaiswal, learned AGP for the petitioners and Shri Saboo, learned counsel for the respondent – applicant – employee. The respondent was on daily wages and has been ordered to be reinstated without back wages. The Labour Court in reference proceedings has awarded this relief. The respondent, therefore, has filed affidavit contending that he has no source of livelihood and no income. Hence, as per provisions of Section 17-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, wages last drawn by him be directed to be deposited. The learned AGP is opposing the request of the applicant. He points out the reply filed on affidavit to show that office records of the petitioners reveal that respondent is working “as a labourer in some agricultural field”. It is not necessary for this court to go into all these niceties. The petitioners can be directed to provide work to the respondent as per his standing in seniority 2 list as and when work is available. Accordingly, with said directions to the petitioners, the present civil application is disposed of with liberty to the respondent to approach again, if he has any other grievance. JUDGE *GS.