HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON^BLE SHRI RAJEEV 6UPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Misc Appeal No.S97 of 2008 «\ Appellants RESPONDENTS 1 Smt Urmila Bai W/o Late Purushottam Yogi, aged about 37 years 2 Kumari Takeshwari D/o Late Purushottam, Yogi, aged about 19 years 3 Ku Puja, D/o Late Purushottam, Yogi, agedabout15years 4 Kumari Maya, D/o Late Purushottam, Yogi, aged about 12 years 5 Bhupesh Kumar S/o Late Purushottam Yogi, aged about 9 years 6 Sagar Yogi, S/o Late Purushottam Yogi, aged about 65 years 7 Smt Vimla Bai, W/o Hemnath Yogi, aged about 65 years All resjdents of Ward No.5 Pandeypara, Balod, Tahsil and PS Balod, District Durg (CG) Versus 1 Vinay Kumar @ Dinesh Bajpai, S/o Late RAmshankar Bajpai, aged about 41 years, R/o Behind New Bus Stand, Baiod, PS and Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG) 2 Brijesh Kumar Bajpai, S/o Naini @ Vinay @ Dinesh Bajpai, aged about 21 years, R/o Khamtarai, Tahsil and District Raipur, At present R/o Near Bus Stand Amapara, Balod, District, Durg (CG) 3 Rajesh Mishra S/o Ram Lakhan / -• ^9 Mishra, aged about years, jR/o Bhanpuri, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur, (CG) 4 The New India Insurance Co Raipur (CG) Through : The Branch Manager, New India Insurance Co. Power Hosue Bhilai, Tahsii and Distrcit Durg Appeal under Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehides Act. 1988 Present : None for the appellants. None for respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, counsel for respondent No.3. Shri Dasarath Gupta, counsel for respondent No.4. ORDER (18th November, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice padma Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge