1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1277 OF 2006 Jayantilal Deepchand Parmar .. Petitioner. Vs. Dinesh N.Dhumawat & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.S.R.Page for the petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for respondent no.1. Mr.P.A.Pol A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.1 and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By this petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 10.4.2006 passed by the Sessions Court on the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision against the order "issue process" passed by the learned Magistrate. By that order the delay was condoned on payment of cost by the petitioner. I perused the order as also the petition. I do not deem it appropriate to interfere with the discretionary order passed by the Sessions Court condoning the delay and I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: . The Sessions Court shall decide the revision 2 2 2 challenging the order "issue process" passed on the complaint under section 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. . With these directions the petition is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)