C.W.P. No. 4235 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 4235 of 2008 Date of decision : 24.3.2008. ... Neelam Rani ................ Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh.Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner ... Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has laid challenge to the selection of respondent No.5, as a Lecturer (Guest Faculty), in the month of October 2006. Earlier also, the petitioner came to this Court by filing CWP No. 2551 of 2008, wherein it was her grouse that selection of respondent No.5 has been made contrary to the provisions of Policy of the State of Haryana with regard to selection of Guest Faculty Lecturers. That writ petition was disposed of on 15.2.2008 directing the authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner, wherein similar allegations were levelled. Vide impugned order dated 7.3.2008 (Annexure P-5), her representation has now been rejected. C.W.P. No. 4235 of 2008 -2- In the impugned order, it is specifically mentioned that for the post in question, 15 applications were received. Those, which were not as per the norms, were rejected. It was further stated that application of the petitioner was also rejected because alongwith her application, she has not annexed any proof of her residence. It is necessary to mention here that as per the Policy to select Guest Faculty lecturers, preference has to be given to the residents of the same village. It has specifically been stated in the impugned order that selected candidate belongs to the village in which appointment was made. No other point was raised. In view of the above observation, no case for interference is made out. Dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( K.C. Puri ) 24.3.2008. Judge chug