FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1869 OF 2008 [Shri. Shivaji Baburao Kapre V/S. Sou. Vandana Shivaji Kapre & Ors.] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : Shri. Vilas B. Tapkir, adv.for the petitioner. Shri. S.P. Kadam, adv. for respondent no.1 and 2. Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for State-respondent no.3. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKHARI, J. DATED : 8th FEBRUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Perused the concurrent orders granting maintenance to respondents no.1 and 2. 3. Both courts have held that the material placed by the wife on record shows that there was a marriage between the petitioner and her. That is also supported by witnesses who were examined by the wife. The courts below have recorded that not only the petitioner did not cross-examine the witnesses, but, also failed to step into the witness box to prove his case that there was no marriage. There is no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of facts which are rendered after a scrutiny of the entire material. There is no perversity or error disclosed warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. (JUDGE)