IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CM No. 2403 of 2011 and C.W.P. No. 3007 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 14th February, 2011. Chanan SinghGill Petitioner through Mr. R.K.Dadwal, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Monica Chhibbar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner retired as an Accounts Clerk/Junior Assistant from the Municipal Council, Majitha, District Amritsar. The non-payment of full retiral dues has promoted him to approach this Court. On 17.12.2010, learned counsel for respondents No. 4 and 5 furnished the details of the amount already paid to the petitioner and had maintained that all the dues except those which are to be ascertained after completion of the Service Book for which a direction stood issued to the Regional Director, Local Bodies Department, Punjab, have since been paid. The petitioner has filed an additional affidavit, which is taken on record, giving details of the amounts which according to him are yet to be released. Having heard learned counsel for the parties at some length and considering the fact that a substantial part of the retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondents No. 3 to 5 to consider the claim of the petitioner as contained in his reply/affidavit filed today and if anything is found due, the same be released to him within a period of three months. If it is found that the petitioner is not entitled to any additional payment, a speaking order in this regard shall be passed and conveyed to the petitioner. Disposed of. Dasti. February 14, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE