1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2448 Of 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai .. .. ..Appellant. Versus M/s. Lever India Exports Limited .. .. .. .. ..Respondent. Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant. Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, senior Advocate with Mr.Nishant Thakkar and Mr.Rajesh Poojari i/by M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 7th January, 2010. P.C. : 1. The only question urged at the hearing, in support of the appeal by the revenue is the applicability of the provisions of Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The question pertains to assessment year 2002-03. The intimation in pursuance of which a refund was granted was dated 20th February 2003. The order under Section 143(3) by which refund was withdrawn was passed on 28th February 2005. In the judgment of this Court dated 15th April 2009 in Income Tax Appeal No.198 of 2009 [Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Bajaj Hindustan Limited], it has been held that Section 234D was brought on the Statute Book on 1st June 2003 and 2 the provision does not have retrospective effect. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises in the appeal. 2. In view of the answer which has been furnished to the first question, the second question which has been formulated in the memo of appeal, becomes academic. The appeal accordingly stands dismissed. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)