IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-21224 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.8.2009 Gyano Devi .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. B. S. Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. On 5.8.2009, after noticing the following contentions of counsel for the petitioner, interim bail was granted to the petitioner: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in the FIR got registered by her daughter- in-law due to matrimonial dispute. There was no demand of dowry ever. In fact, the son of the petitioner and the complainant could not settle in their matrimonial home due to temperamental differences. Son of the petitioner, the husband, has already been released on regular bail. The petitioner is a senior citizen and is not keeping good health.” It is not disputed that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 5.8.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 19.8.2009 mk