1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 263 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1276 OF 1989 Vishwanath Ramji Mandade. .. ... Petitioner. Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. .. ... Respondents. Mr. N. M. Ganguli for the Petitioner. Mr. G. S. Hegde for the Respondents. CORAM : F. I. REBELLO & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 15TH MARCH, 2010 P. C.: The petition has been dismissed by order dated 25th January, 2000. Notice of Motion has been taken out in the year 2009. In our opinion, considering that the petition is disposed of, the present notice of motion will not be maintainable and hence dismissed. It will be open for the petitioner to take such recourse to the law as may be entitled to in law. Sd/- (F.I. REBELLO,J.) Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 290 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1276 OF 1989 Vishwanath Ramji Mandade. .. ... Petitioner. Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. .. ... Respondents. Mr. N. M. Ganguli for the Petitioner. Mr. G. S. Hegde for the Respondents. CORAM : F. I. REBELLO & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 15TH MARCH, 2010 P. C.: This notice of motion is in the nature of review petition. The order was passed by a Division Bench of which Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. C. Daga is still available. In the light of that, Registry to place this notice of motion before the learned Chief Justice for appropriate directions within one week from today, considering that the petition was disposed of on 25th January, 2000 and the notice of motion is of the same year. Sd/- (F.I. REBELLO,J.) Sd/- (A. A. SAYED, J.)