IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 4752 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRL.M.P.7314/2011 of J.M.F.C., CHALAKUDY .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2:- ----------------------------------- 1. RAJAN, AGED 48, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, KULAKODU HOUSE, THIRUMALA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUDHEESHKUMAR, AGED 42, S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, PAVITHRA NAGAR, NOW RESIDING AT MEDAMUKKU, T.C.41/213 NO. HOUSE OF SINDHU, NASAR HOUSE. BY ADV. SRI.P.SHAIJAN JOSEPH RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:- ---------------------------------- SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALAKUDY POLICE STATION, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. MR. M.S. BREEZE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 4752 of 2011 ..................................................... Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2011. ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.1457 of 2010 of Chalakudy Police Station, Thrissur for offences punishable under Sections 465, 466, 472, 473 and 475 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 20.10.2010. The petitioners were arrested on 19.05.2011. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the petitioners had produced fake identity card and forged title deeds for enabling the accused in a case before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chalakudy to be enlarged on bail. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making B.A. No. 4752 of 2010 2 themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv