In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.20898 of 2008 Sanjay Kamat @ Sanjay Choudhary & Ors. Vrs. The State of Bihar **** /3/ 24.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners were not named in the first information report registered for offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Informant is father of the deceased. During investigation, after two days of the institution of the first information report further statement of the informant has been recorded at paragraph 46 of the case diary where it is said that name of these petitioners were disclosed in connection with death of his son. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant when came to know about his restatement, dated 29.08.2007, recorded in case diary, he himself filed a protest on 11.10.2007 stating that he never made such statement. In fact, the police is trying to protect the real culprits and bringing investigation in a wrong direction. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, (1) Sanjay Kamat @ Sanjay Choudhary, (2) Dinesh Choudhary and (3) Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Choudhary, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Madhubani (Rahika) P.S. Case No. 306 of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )