IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2011 / 17TH SRAVANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 429 of 2011(S) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32984/2010 Dated 29/10/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WPC -------------------------------------------------------------- B.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR @ B.R.NAIR, S/O.N.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, K.G.S.D.DEPARTMENT, L.I.C. OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT H.NO.GRA-245, GOWRISA, PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4 BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S. SRI.T.PRASAD RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.A.K.DAS GUPTA, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, YOGAKSHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI-21. 2. SMT.D.VIJAYALEKSHMI, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PERSONNEL), THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, YOGAKSHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI-21. 3. SRI.R.K.DUBEY, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY(PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION) PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL OFFICE, THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, YOGAKSHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, MUMBAI-21. 2/- -2- COC.NO.429/2011 4. SRI.M.R.KUMAR, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THE ZONAL MANAGER, L.I.C. OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI-12. 5. SRI.SAJI PAUL, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, L.I.C. OF INDIA DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN,SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Cont. Case No. 429 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 8th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this contempt case without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take all his contentions in the writ petition. Permission is granted and the contempt case is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/