1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1987 of 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1987 of 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1987 of 2005 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1986 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1986 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1986 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra : Applicant. versus Chandrakant Yashwant Agre : Respondent. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. DATED : MARCH 10, 2006. DATED : MARCH 10, 2006. DATED : MARCH 10, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. So far as Criminal Application No.1987 of 2005 is concerned, it is filed by the State for condonation of delay of 141 days in filing the 2 2 2 appeal. The Respondent is served. Nobody is present for him. No affidavit-in-replay is filed. Heard the learned APP. The Explanation given for delay is found satisfactory. Hence the Criminal Application No.1987 of 2005 is allowed. Delay is condoned. Criminal Application is disposed of. 2. So far as Criminal Application No.1986 of 2005 is concerned, it is for leave to file appeal. Heard the learned APP. Leave is granted. Appeal is admitted. Put up the appeal for hearing in due course. [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI]