IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 358 OF 2006 NO. 358 OF 2006 NO. 358 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 976 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 976 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 976 OF 2006 Surang Investments Pvt.Ltd. ... Appellants. Versus. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ... Respondents. Shri Milind Vasudeo i/by Chandani-Kumana & Associates for the Appellants. Shri Vinod Mahadik for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : KSHITIJ R.VYAS, C.J., & : KSHITIJ R.VYAS, C.J., & : KSHITIJ R.VYAS, C.J., & ABHAY ABHAY ABHAY S.OKA, J. S.OKA, J. S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : June 13, 2006. : June 13, 2006. : June 13, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17th April 2006 passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the petition on the ground that the Appellants have already challenged the order dated 6th February 2006 by filing a statutory Appeal before the Court of Small Causes, Bombay. Since the Appellants have resorted to the remedy of statutory Appeal, we hardly see any reason to entertain this Appeal. In our opinion, the learned single Judge was justified in rejecting the petition. This appeal is accordingly dismissed. CHIEF CHIEF CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE JUSTICE ABHAY ABHAY ABHAY S.OKA, J. S.OKA, J. S.OKA, J.