Civil Revision No. 3291 of 2007 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 3291 of 2007 Date of Decision: 14.11.2008 Tikka Ram …Petitioner Versus Smt. Sarla Gupta and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vikram Preet Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Jagga, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Before instituting a petition under Section 13 A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) being a specified landlord, Baldev Sahai landlord had filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act on the ground of personal necessity. Learned Rent Controller came to conclusion that personal necessity of the landlord is made out. Against this, an appeal was filed. Appeal was decided on 15.5.2007 and the learned lower Appellate Court had upheld the personal necessity of the landlord. Since alternative prayer of the petitioner has been accepted in Civil Revision No. 4783 of 2003, the same is also accepted in the present case. Mr. Arora states that the undertaking to be filed in Civil Civil Revision No. 3291 of 2007 2 Revision Petition No. 4783 of 2003 be also considered to be an undertaking filed in the present case. Therefore, in view of the orders passed in Civil Revision No. 4783 of 2003, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 14, 2008 “DK”