IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33567 of 2010 SHATRUDHAN RAI, son of Baijnath Rai Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 03.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of impugned order that the name of this petitioner surfaced in further statement of the informant, who stated before the I.O. that some villagers disclosed the name of petitioner before him. The contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that except the aforesaid material there is nothing against the petitioner and so far as the aforesaid evidence is concerned, the same is nothing but only creation of police officials. The criminal antecedents of the petitioner has been called for and it appears from the report of Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna that except one case the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, 2 above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri. S. K. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)