IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PIL NO.93 OF 2008 Shri Sudhir Pralhad Barge and another ... Petitioners Vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. S.M. Oak i/by Mr. Sagar Joshi for the petitioners. Mr. R.M. Kadam, Advocate General with Ms. Jyoti Pawar, Additional Government Pleader for the State. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P. DESHPANDE , J. DATE : 14TH JULY , 2008 P.C.: The learned Advocate General appearing for the State submits that the Government has decided not to give effect to the circular dated 4th July, 2008 for the current academic year. They will examine the matter and take appropriate decision for the next academic year and affidavit has also been filed in the court today which is taken on record. Consequently, nothing survives in this Public Interest Litigation in view of the statement made by the learned Advocate General. 2. Public Interest Litigation is disposed of as having become infructuous. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.