1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1665/2008 (Bhanu Prakash Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of order : 20.05.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Petitioner Bhanu Prakash Mathur present in person. Mr. D.S.Sodha for the respondent. By the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed as under :- “It is, therefore, prayed that by issuing appropriate writ, Order or Direction the respondents may kindly be directed not hold any election without publishing the voter list and deleted the those names whose not full fill for the requirement of the Section 23 (1) of the rule 1993.” Mr. D.S.Sodha, counsel appearing for the respondent No.4 submits that the election has already been held and result has been declared on 15.4.2008 and new body after having been elected has been constituted. However, the petitioner submits that election has not been held on 15.4.2008 but has been held 2 on 27.4.2008 and result thereof has been declared on the same day. In this view of the matter, there arises no question now to restrain to the respondents to hold the election since the election has already been completed and result thereof has been declared and new body has also been constituted. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he may challenge the election itself if the remedy provides for challenging the election. The writ petition has become infructuous and it is therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 3 S.B.CIVIL MISC. STAY PETITION NO. 2879/08 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1665/2008 Date of order : 20.05.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Petitioner Bhanu Prakash Mathur present in person. Mr. D.S.Sodha for the respondent. Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed as having become infructuous, the stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp