IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5769 of 2010 VIKASH MAHTO @ CHHOTU @ VIKASH @ CHHOTU MAHTO S/O KAPILDEO PRASAD VERMA @ WAKIL MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 31.03.2010 Heard the application for anticipatory bail for offence under Section 3 of the Railway Property Unlawful Possession Act regarding the recovery of thirty meters of railway cable. However, one of the accused apprehended who disclosed the names of three persons, who fled away from the place of occurrence and said accused disclosed the name of this petitioner amongst the persons who were at the place of occurrence. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 3. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 4. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today and if he surrenders and prays for regular bail that will be considered on it’s own merit without being prejudiced of this order. S.A. (Gopal Prasad, J. )