IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1249 of 2008 Date of decision:16.03.2009 Smt. Safeedi ...Petitioner versus Tejpal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is against the order of the Appellate Court dated 14.02.2008 permitting the petition to set aside the ex parte decree of compromise vis-a-vis only the minor children and allowing the compromise to subsist against the mother, Safedi. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Safedi had not entered into compromise nor was she present in the Court and the order observing that the decree would be binding on Safedi was wrong. The counsel for the respondent has no objection to setting aside the decree as against the mother also, who admittedly was not present in the Court and who had not signed any compromise. The revision is accordingly ordered directing the compromise to be set aside even against the interest of Safedi. 2. The revision is allowed in the above terms. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 16.03.2009 sanjeev