^^^^^ rw in;c'^"r'31 ^^ f 0" ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.fS) N0.^63>/2010 Ajmulla Ansari, S/o- Shri Mainuddin Ansari, Aged about 31 years, R/o- StaffQuarter, Domanhill, P.O.-Sonawani, Chirimm, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS Collector, Korea, Distt,. Korea, Chhattisgarh. ^ p^o" ^^" ^-\" ,.^^ >^^^ ,^^--^ Rasid Rasid, S/o- Not known to the petitioner, Aged about-Not known to the petitioner, (Presently working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Primary School-Majhagawa (Education Department), Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea.C.G. Najnin Bano, D/o- Not known to the petitioner, Aged about-Not known to the petitioner, (Presently working as Shiksha Kanni Grade-3, Primary School-Patna (School Education Department), Tehsil- Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea. C.G. President, General Administration Committee, Jaapad Panchayat-Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea, C.G. ChiefExecutive Officer, Janpad Panchayat- Korea, (Baikunthpur), Distt. Korea, C.G. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -^ ^^ '3FT f<-<icb '<T8TT 3TI^T $^^ic^ Praveen '5^T ^|A||d^, ^tll'M^Ko, [®I<?1I<M^< xixdi *^i*-^-W-2-2'^° 3TI^T TT^T ( ^t^^T) ^200 '^TTWHf^T 3^?T <=M^f<n^ll TTPR^?f ^f fe^t <p3l^l< <^3tfw3TT^?r SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mlohan Shrivastava, J. 23.6.2010 Shri Pawan ShrivastavaJ counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, ^&nel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.l, on advance copy. Submission of learned ct)unsel for the petitioner is that aggrieved by certain appointments of Sljiiksha Karmi, petitioner had preferred a statutoiy appeal under Sectiojn 91 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam read with Secticjn 13 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shikshakarmi (Bharti Tatha ^ of Chhattisgarh of Chhattis| Rules, 1995 before the Ccj Authority under the Rules. It is submitted that thoij |eva Ki Sharten) Rules, 2007 and Rule 3 ^arh Panchayat (Appeal and Revision) ^llector, who is constituted Appellate .gh this appeal was filed on 5.9.2008, the same has not so far been decicjled and kept pending. Taking into considerati^n the nature of grievance raised, this petition ij finally disposed off ^jvith a direction to respondent Nol/State to decide the appeal expedit^ously, preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of rec^ipt of copy of this order, subject to the cooperation by the petitioner. It is made clear that thi^ merits of the case. Court has not expressed any opinion on Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge