HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.5054 OF 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 15-09-2009 in C.M.A.No.23 of 2006, on the file of the Principal Senior Judge, Kothagudem, wherein the said appeal filed by the petitioners herein, was dismissed, confirming the order dated 04-07-2006 in I.A.832 of 2006 in R.C.C.No.1 of 2002, on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the records. 3. The petitioners herein are the tenants in respect of the schedule premises and the respondent is the landlord. The respondent filed R.C.C.No.1 of 2002 for eviction of the petitioners initially on the grounds of willful default and bona fide requirement for personal occupation. Subsequently, according to the respondent, the petitioners have indulged in certain material alterations and structural changes to the building during the pendency of the RCC. The respondent, therefore, filed I.A.No.832 of 2006 seeking amendment of the RCC by raising an additional ground for eviction alleging that the petitioners have unauthorizedly effected material alterations and structural changes to the schedule building. The petitioners opposed the same. The learned rent controller, by the impugned order dated 04-07-2006, allowed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners/tenants filed C.M.A.No.23 of 2006. The learned Senior Civil Judge, by the impugned order dated 15-09-2009, dismissed the said appeal. Hence, the civil revision petition by the tenants. 4. According to the respondent, the material alterations and structural changes to the building are effected during the pendency of the RCC. It is well settled that either of the parties to the proceedings is certainly entitled to bring to the notice of the Court any subsequent event that has taken place during the pendency of the proceeding in respect of the subject matter of the proceeding and seek necessary amendments so that the Court can mould the relief in such a way that the subsequent events are also duly taken note of. It is stated that as no stay was granted by this Court while admitting the civil revision petition and, on the other hand, it was directed that the pendency of the revision petition shall not be an impediment for proceeding with the trial of the case, the trial Court has, in fact, proceeded with and evidence was adduced by both sides in respect of the proposed amendment also, whereunder an additional ground for eviction was added. It is also stated that the matter has now reached the stage of arguments. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in view of the pendency of the present civil revision petition, the petitioners could not focus their attention on adducing evidence pertaining to the proposed amendment concerning the additional ground of eviction and an opportunity may be given to them to adduce further evidence. 5. In the circumstances, having regard to the fact that recording of the evidence of both sides has since been completed and the matter has reached the stage of arguments, it is considered imprudent at this stage to go into the merits of the case and decide whether the amendment allowed by the rent controller and affirmed by the appellate authority is sustainable or not. As the parties have adduced evidence on all aspects, including the additional ground pleaded by way of amendment, the learned rent controller would decide the matter on merits without in any way being influenced by the observations made in the impugned order at the interlocutory stage while allowing the proposed amendment. The parties are also at liberty to adduce such further evidence as they may deem necessary pertaining to the additional ground pleaded by way of amendment. Having regard to the fact that the RCC is of the year 2002, the learned rent controller is directed to dispose of the same at an early date, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 29th March, 2011 Note:: Issue cc in one week B/o Lrkm.