1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 619/2008 (Sau. Rajani Ashok Gulhane Vs. U.O.I. & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2008. Heard Mr. Kothari for the petitioner. In the present writ petition, it is not in dispute that the order under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Securitization Act) was passed way back on 20/11/2005. Though the petitioner had challenged the said order, under Section 17 of the Securitization Act, however, the time prescribed for filing the said application was only 45 days and since the same was filed by the petitioner beyond the period of 45 2 days, and for want of a specific provision to condone the delay, the appropriate authority has dismissed the said application for condonation of delay, as well as the application which was filed against the order dated 20/11/2005. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has not challenged the order dated 20/11/2005 passed under Section 13(4) of the Securitization Act as well as the order passed under Section 17 of the said Act. The petitioner has suffered both these orders. Consequently, the orders have attained finality long time ago. In such peculiar facts and circumstances, the petitioner will not be able to derive any benefit from the interim orders passed by the Apex Court in the year 2007 in Special Leave Petition No. 17573/2007. Petition suffers from lack of merits. Same is dismissed. The counsel for the petitioner seeks three weeks' time to approach the Supreme Court, and prays that the present order may be stayed. 3 Since the order under Section 13(4) of the Securitization Act was passed way back in 2005 and since we have dismissed the writ petition, the request is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE RMP