THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3854 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioners herein are defendants 2 and 3 in the suit in O.S.No.176 of 2007 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, filed by respondents 1 to 14 herein for declaration and possession of the plaint schedule property. In the said suit, after closing the evidence of both sides and when the matter was coming up for arguments, the petitioners herein filed an application in I.A.No.909 of 2011 under Section 151 CPC to reopen the defendant’s side evidence. The court below, vide its order, dated 30-07-2011, dismissed the said application with costs. Aggrieved thereby, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. I have perused the affidavit filed by the petitioner before the court below, wherein the petitioner stated that the matter was posted for arguments on 01-07-2011 and he is relying on a will, dated 14-03-2001, which was executed by one Dumpa Anasuyamma, wife of China Bapanaiah, in which, he has examined one of the attestor Burlagadda Sriramulu as DW.3, the other attestors and scribe have died. To prove the Will, he has to examine the nearest relation of the deceased attestors and scribe and therefore, he filed the present application. In the instant case, the petitioner has not named the nearest relative of the deceased attestors and scribe and it is also not stated as to when the attestors and scribe have died. The said application filed by the petitioner is bereft of any material particulars. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the court below, after hearing both sides and after considering the material available on record, rightly dismissed the said application and I do not find any infirmity legal or otherwise in the impugned order, so as to call for interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 21-10-2011 Prv