IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7620 of 2010 SACHIDA NAND SINGH @ PUDIN SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 11/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections- 302, 307/34 of Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act to urge false implication is that it is highly unlikely that when the ‘Barat’ came for the wedding of the petitioner’s daughter at this stage when petitioner had the time to meticulously assaulted the deceased rather than to see his prospective son-in-law and others. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No.30/2009. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)