1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3723/2010 Smt. Shilabai Sukhdeorao Raibole and another ...Versus... District Sainik Social Officer, Amravati Tq. & Distt. Amravati and another --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri N.R. Saboo, Adv. for petitioners] CORAM:- S.A. BOBDE, J. DATED :- 13.08.2010 The petitioners have challenged the order of stay granted by the Industrial Court. By the impugned order, the Industrial Court stayed the reinstatement granted to the petitioners by the Labour Court. It appears from the order of the Industrial Court that the stay was granted because the Industrial Court is of the view that the status of the respondent – employer that is to say whether it is an industry or not needs to be gone into and that moreover, prima facie there is no vacancy with the respondent - employer for cooks. The observations of the Industrial Court are obviously made prima facie. The impugned order being interlocutory, it would not be proper to interfere with it. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. However, in the circumstances of the case, the Industrial Court is directed to decide the revision as expeditiously as possible and not later than six months from today. JUDGE SSW