bsb : 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2200 OF PETITION NO. 2200 OF PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2006 2006 2006 Mrs. Meena Mukund Deorukhar ... Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ¦ Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s ¦ Orders Order or Directions and ¦ Registrar’s Orders ¦ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Shubhangi Chavan holding for Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner. Mrs. U.V. Kejariwal, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & S.B. MHASE & S.B. MHASE & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, NISHITA MHATRE, NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED: 6TH DECEMBER, 2006 6TH DECEMBER, 2006 6TH DECEMBER, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner to register a F.I.R. as against Mr. Shekhar Bhikaji Madhaikar. It is pertinent to note that, initially a complaint was given as against the four persons and the C.R. has been registered against the four persons. Now the bsb : 2 : complainant petitioner wants to improve this case and add some more persons. Such a course is not permissible under Section 154. However, if in further investigations the investigating officer finds that there are more accused than the accused stated in the complaint, then the petitioner may consider to include the names of those persons. However, at this stage, this is not a case for an intervention by this Court. We, therefore, reject the petition. ( S.B. MHASE, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. )