C.R.No.2713 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2713 of 2007 Date of decision : 18.12.2008 Joginder Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus Ranjit Kaur ......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER ..... Present : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ... MAHESH GROVER, J. This revision petition is directed against the orders dated 18.10.2004 and 27.7.2006. The petitioners suffered an ex parte decree against them. An application for setting aside the decree was moved which was dismissed in default. An application for restoration of the said application was moved which was pending and in the meantime execution proceedings were preferred by the decree- holder/respondent. In the execution proceedings the petitioners took up the objections that his application for setting aside the ex-parte proceedings was pending. The objections were dismissed and the appeal against that order was also dismissed. While dismissing the objections, the court of competent jurisdiction had taken into account the fact that the attachment of the property of the petitioners was effected on 9.12.2000 and the petitioners were duly served with the C.R.No.2713 of 2007 -2- notice under Order 21 Rule 66 C.P.C. But despite service, no objections were filed. The objections were filed subsequently on 2.8.2001 and even after filing the objections they were proceeded against ex-parte. It was further noticed that the decree in question was passed ex-parte and an application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. was pending for setting aside the ex-parte decree. But the facts are, however, to the contrary. In fact, the application was dismissed. The Court, therefore, rightly concluded that it was merely an attempt to delay the execution proceedings. No infirmity has been show to have been committed by the executing Court. In this view of the matter, there is no merit in the revision petition and the same is dismissed. 18.12.2008 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss