c ^-1 €T~ff 2- 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.S No... .....%%§&...../2010 PETITIONER: t ..-y' ^^ ^y' ^TV^ .<A'. iy "*"' ^' ..'!" Anup Kumar Chaturvredani, ' Aged about 48 years, S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Ghaturvredani, presently posted as Senior Agriculture Development Officer in the office of Deputy Directpr, Agriculture, Fertilizer Quality Control Lab, Raipur (C.G.) ^ ^.- ^" ^- ^' RESPONDENTS: i.,&l?^^i {^^.^ j w^./~ VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secret^ry, Department of Agriculture, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) / 2. Director,Agriculture Directorate of Agriculture, IGKV Campus, Krishak Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^3. Assistant Director, Agriculture Fertilizer Quality Control Laboratory, Labhandi Farm, Raipur (Ghhattisgarh) ^" 4. Basant Kumar Sahu Presenfly posted as Rural Agriculture Development Officer, Block and Disbrict Mahasamund (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF \s .( J .^- MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- HTGH COIJRT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BTTA8PUR WRIT PETmON ('S) No. 3858 of2010 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Aiiup Kiimar C'ha.tar^eda.m, VRR8IJS State ofChhattisgarh & Ancrther, PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ne Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Jitendra Pali., Advocate fbr the petitioner. Slm Shashaiik Tliakur, Panel La-wyer for the State/rcsponde$it No. 1 to 3. ORBER (ORAT.) (Passed on 11th day ofOctober, 2011) 1, Leamed coimsel appearing for the State submits tliat the petitioiier has already Gontmued a* the origmal place ofpostmg for more than one year on account of interim order grasited by this Court 27.07,2010, The StMe may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view piiblic interest and admimstrative exigency. S'hri Thakw flirther submits that'llie StMe sha.il not insist. iipoii compliance of the impugaed order dated and 15»07,2010 . (Amiexiire P/l) m respect. ofthe petifioner. 2. At this stage, when no ef&ct could be givesi to the impiig^ed order dated 15=07.2010 (Aimexiire P/l) on accoimt ofthe mt.erim order dated 27,07.2010, thus, it. is not newssa-ry t.o go into l^gality and validity ofthe aforestated impiigned order. 3. In view of the above^ accordmg to ieamed comi^el appearmg for the petitioner^ nothing survives iu this petitiosi for adjudicatioii. 4, Accordmgly, the petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge