Crl. Misc. No. M- 10748 of 2009 Vijay Kumar vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.M.S.Sindhu , Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. Mr.A.K.Saini, Advocate, for the complainant. **** While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 22.4.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had got married to Punam, daughter of the complainant. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana as well as the complainant for 29.5.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Nathu Ram, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. Poonam, daughter of the complainant, is also present in Court and has confirmed her marriage with the petitioner. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 22.4.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE May 29, 2009 anita