IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 9TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 18TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5199 of 2010() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.169/CR/TVM/06) .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------- FAZIL,S/O.YOUSUF,FAZIL NIVAS, KARIMBUVILA,NJARAYILKONAM,MADAVOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KILIMANOOR. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH C.I.D,HOMICIDE AND HURT WING-1, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK V. RAMKUMAR, J. ..................................... Bail Application No. 5199 of 2010 ..................................................... Datedthis the 9th day of September, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 8th accused in Crime No. 169/CR/TVM/06 for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148 and 302 read with Section 149 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 09.05.2006. The petitioner was arrested on 17.08.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE ln