1 WP 7220/2009 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7220 OF 2009 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. A.M. Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. Vishwanath Talkute for respondent no.2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 20TH JUNE 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 raises a preliminary objection about maintainability of the writ petition and submits that the petition has become infructuous. 3. On 16th December 2008, the petitioner made an application at Exhibit­63 (Exhibit­H to the writ petition) praying that the execution proceedings no. 149 of 1990 be stayed. That 2 WP 7220/2009 application was rejected by the Court. Thereafter the petitioner filed another application at Exhibit­72 for review of the order of refusal of the stay. By the impugned order, the trial Court rejected the application for review. 4. Counsel for the respondents­decree holder submits that the execution proceedings has since been completed and the properties are already divided in execution of the decree. There is no question of further proceedings of Darkhast and the writ petition has become infructuous and as such disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)