IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2135 OF 2009 Chunilal Beheralal Makwana ...Petitioner V/s. Hirachand Panechand Solanki ...Respondent ...... Mr.G.S.Godbole i/b Mr.J.S.Yadav for Petitioner. Mr.C.K.Tripathi for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 4, 2009. MARCH 4, 2009. MARCH 4, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The order impugned in this Petition is a discretionary order passed by the Court below at the interlocutory stage. Indeed, the Petitioner will have opportunity to cross-examine the witness. Assuming that there is some error of jurisdiction committed by the lower Court in the impugned order, however, the same is capable of being corrected at a later stage. As observed by the Apex Court in : 2 : the case of Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai & Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675 Ors. reported in (2003) 6 SCC 675, in particular, in Paragraph 39, that the wrong done, if any, could be set right and the rights and equities can be adjusted in appeal or revision preferred at the conclusion of the proceedings, no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is warranted. Hence, dismissed. 3. Needless to observe that all questions raised in the present Petition are kept open to be agitated by the Petitioners in the appeal or revision to be preferred against the final decision at the conclusion of the proceedings which will have to be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.