IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7854 of 2011 Kulwant Kaur Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Delhi and others Present: Mr.H.C.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Claiming to be the purchaser of a property, which has been purchased much prior to the attachment, the petitioner has approached this court to seek quashing of the order of attachment. If the property is not under any charge and has been purchased by the petitioner, it would be appropriate for him to approach the authority which has issued the attachment without hearing him, where the issues can properly be gone into by the authority concerned. With this observation, no case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. May 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE