REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 244 of 2011 (O&M) in -1- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 16868 OF 1990 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: August 19 , 2011. Parties Name Vijay Kumar Katyal and another ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. T.P.Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (oral) Order. This application has been filed to review an order dated April 25, 2011, on a ground that some facts were concealed from the Court, when that order was passed. To say so, reliance has been placed upon an application filed by the respondent – State, by way of an objection to the order passed by the Lok Adalat on January 5, 2001. By making reference to the pleadings in paragraph No. 5, it is stated that not only the existence of Mandir is admitted, rather it is stated that the Government is ready to REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 244 of 2011 (O&M) in -2- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 16868 OF 1990 maintain the same. In view of above, counsel argues that the information given to the contrary at the time when this writ petition was dismissed was not correct. We are not impressed with the argument raised. In paragraph No. 3, it is specifically stated that common platform meant for placing and auctioning of the agricultural produce in front of shops No. 30 to 48 will not be able to be constructed, resulting into failure of the whole development plan of the New Grain Market, if the land in dispute is released from acquisition. It is further stated in paragraph No. 4 that the so-called Mandir was constructed over-night, when the notification was issued. It is further case of the applicants that the Mandir exists in 4 Acres of land. At the time of arguments when order was passed on April 25, 2011, a site plan was placed on record, which clearly indicates that the small building stated to be Mandir falls in the road alignment. We had seen the site plan and found that it was correct. No case is made out for review. Dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge August 19, 2011 DKC