IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.P(M) No. 891 of 2008. Date of decision: September 26, 2008. Sandeep Chauhan …..Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. …. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the applicant : Mr. G.S.Rathore, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. Advocate General. Kuldip Singh, Judge (oral). The petitioner has filed this application, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for releasing him on bail in FIR No. 116 dated 12.6.2007, registered at Police Station, Barmana under Sections 342, 328, 392, 34 IPC. The respondent has filed status report. 2. Heard and perused the record. The petitioner had earlier filed Cr.M.P.(M) No. 725 of 2008 for releasing him on bail in FIR No. 116 dated 12.6.2007 registered at Police Station, Barmana, which was dismissed on 25.7.2008, certified copy of the order dated 25.7.2008 has been placed on record. The facts have been given in detail in the order dated 25.7.2008, therefore, I am not repeating the facts of the case again. The learned counsel for the petitioner has Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? …2… submitted that present application has been filed on subsequent events and changed circumstances. He has submitted that prior to the arrest of the petitioner in the present case he was pursuing Computer Engineering Course from NIIT at Delhi and because of his arrest in the case, his continuation in that course has been hampered. He has submitted that in case petitioner is released on bail then he will be in a position to continue with his studies in Computer Engineering Course. He has also submitted that petitioner wanted to appear in JBT entrance exam, which was fixed on 7.9.2008. The mother of the petitioner is suffering from mental depression because of the arrest of the petitioner in the present case. He has submitted that investigation in the case is complete and continuous detention of the petitioner is not required. 3. The learned Additional Advocate general has submitted that bail application of the petitioner has already been considered and dismissed by this court on 25.7.2008 and after 25.7.2008, there is no change of circumstance for releasing the petitioner on bail. He has submitted that the case was registered on 12.6.2007 and the petitioner surrendered and was arrested on 1.7.2008. In between he left Computer Engineering Course at Delhi, hence there is no question of petitioner’s continuing with the said course. The JBT entrance exam of the petitioner even as per petitioner was over on 7.9.2008. There is nothing on record to show that the mother of the petitioner is suffering from mental depression or there is nobody to look after the mother of the petitioner. …3… 4. I have considered the rival contentions. The petitioner has placed nothing on record to show that he is continuing with Computer Engineering Course at Delhi. The JBT entrance exam of the petitioner even according to the petitioner was fixed on 7.9.2008. There is nothing on record that the mother of the petitioner is suffering from mental depression or there is nobody to look after his mother. Moreover, this is no ground for releasing the petitioner on bail. The petitioner has failed to make out any case for releasing him on bail. Resultantly, the application is dismissed. 5. Any observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion over the merits of the case. September 26, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ) (Hem) Judge.