IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8608 of 2010 Date of Decision: 12.5.2010 Jagjit Singh ....Petitioner. Versus The Additional State Transport Commissioner and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to decide the application dated 10.5.2006 (Annexure P-2) filed by him for variation of condition of Mini Bus Permit, i.e. for variation of route by way of diversion from Gobindpura-Bareta via Sirsiwala-Dayalpura to Gobindpura-Bareta via Jalvehra and subsequently extension up to Kulrian from Bareta. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said application is pending before respondent No.2 since 2006 and prays that a direction be issued to him to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, it is considered appropriate to dispose of this matter without issuing notice of motion to the respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the application (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order. May 12, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE