1 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. SECOND APPLICATION FOR BAIL/ SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE NO.869/2007 IN S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.606/2007 (Chandan Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) ... Date of Order: August 06,2007 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. Pradeep Shah, for the appellant-applicants. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicants and the Public Prosecutor. Perused the impugned judgment and order as also the record of the trial Court. Admit. Issue notice. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant and the Public Prosecutor for the State on the application for suspension of substantive sentence. Having considered the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the short sentence awarded to the appellant-applicants, I think is just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to the appellant-applicant. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence of imprisonment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, 2 Jaisalmer, vide judgment dated 25-7-2007 in Sessions Case No. 17/2006 against appellant-applicants (1) Chandan Singh S/o Roop Singh; and (2) Sagat Singh S/o Daulat Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before this Court on 11-9-2007 and whenever ordered to do so with the incorporation in the bond that as and when he will shift his place of residence, he will intimate to this Court and his lawyer about his new place of residence. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs