IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15492 of 2010 RAM VINAY YADAV . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 03/ 04-Oct-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner has raised a grievance that respondent No.5, Surendra Yadav a co-villager of the petitioner has started making construction on a land which is a part of public road. The matter involves issues of fact and hence it will not be proper to take up this dispute as public interest litigation. The writ petition is disposed of. 3. However, since the petitioner has alleged that the land is by way of public road which is being encroached, hence, the Circle Officer, Tekari, Gaya, Respondent No.4 will look into the matter which has been brought to his notice on 11.08.2010 through Annexure-2 and take proper action in accordance with law. If the encroachment is on public land particularly on road, then as per provisions of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 action may be taken as 2 early as possible preferably within two weeks from the date of a production/communication of a copy of this order. 4. In case, the petitioner is not satisfied with the steps taken by the Circle Officer, he would be at liberty to approach Civil Courts for appropriate relief. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)