1 wp9582-10.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9582 OF 2010 Vaijanta Machhindra Shinde & Ors .. Petitioners versus Vasudeo Tayyappa Shinde (deceased) through his legal heirs Kisan V. Shinde & Ors .. Respondents Mr.P.G.Sarda for the petitioners. None for the respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 28th JULY 2011. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Sarda appearing on behalf of the petitioner. He apologizes for not being present on the earlier date. With his consent, the petition is taken up for admission. 2 Having heard him, I am of the opinion that it is not necessary to interfere with the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune. The order passed by him confirms certain directions 2 wp9582-10.doc with regard to revenue entries. The petitioner despite such revenue entries, can approach the Civil Court which they have already approached and seek appropriate declaratory and other reliefs. The adjudication by the Civil Court is on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence placed before it. There is no necessity of clarifying that the Civil Court is not being influenced by the orders made by the revisional authorities. Despite such orders, the petitioners can seek interim as well as final reliefs from the Civil Court. Keeping open all contentions in that behalf, the petition is dismissed. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)