IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.13 OF 1985 Dr.Mrs.Shailaja Girish Bhatia ...Petitioner Versus University of Pune & Ors. ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.Pethe i/b Mr.R.S.Ketkar for Respondents 3,4,6 & 8. Mr.Mhambre, A.G.P. for Respondent/State. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 14, 2006. MARCH 14, 2006. MARCH 14, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None appears for the Petitioner. The Petitioner was represented by Shri Justice A.P.Shah, as he then was, as Advocate on record. After elevation of Justice Shah, no steps have been taken by the Petitioner to engage another Advocate. The Court notice was sent to the Petitioner which has been received back with the remark that the Petitioner is not residing at the given address and : 2 : the present whereabouts are not known. In that sense, the Petition will have to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. There is additional reason as stated by the Counsel for the Respondent. According to him, in view of the subsequent developments, nothing survives in this Petition. 3. Be that as it may, Petition is disposed of for non-prosecution. Notice issued to Respondent is discharged. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.