IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 24TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 30701 of 2004(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. ANJU ALBERT B.TECH S-7, RAJAGIRI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY KAKKANAD P.O. 2. JELU JAYARAJ, B.TECH S-7 RAJAGIRI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY KAKKANAD P.O. 3. ARUN BASIL VARGHESE B.TECH S-7, RAJAGIRI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, KAKKANAD P.O. 4. NIKHIL JOSE, B.TECH S-7, RAJAGIRI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY KAKKANAD P.O. BY ADV. SRI.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, REJAGIRI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.MUHAMMAD YOUSUF, SC, M.G.UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 30701/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF THE UNIVERSITY ORDER (U.O.) NO.AC A.IV/1/11614/B./2004 DATED 7.8.2004. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER NOTIFICATION. EXT.P3 COPIES OF THE APPLICATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 30.9.2004. EXT.P3(a) COPIES OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPTS. EXT.P4 COPIES OF THE REPRESENATIONS DATED 20.8.2004 & 7.10.2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE. jg C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 30701 OF 2004 -------------------------------- Dated, this the 13th day of February, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioners approached this Court for a direction to the University to permit them to write the examination and this Court vide interim order dated 19/10/2004, permitted the petitioners to write the examinations subject to further orders with regard to publication of results. It is seen that petitioners were not qualified to write the seventh semester examination as they have not passed all subjects up to fourth semester. Learned counsel submitted that later some relaxation has been made by the University and even those who have not passed up to fourth semester can write the examination. If there is change of regulation, then I see no reason why the petitioners should be declined the benefit. This writ petition is disposed of directing the University to publish results, if not already done, in accordance with the current examination regulations. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) jg