RSA. No.2776 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA. No.2776 of 2008 Date of Decision: 05.08.2010. Daya Kishan and another .……Appellants Versus Kunj Behari and others ……Respondents Coram:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr.Anil Ghangas, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. P.C. Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 6. Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate for respondent No.7. L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) With the intervention of the Court, parties i.e appellants and respondent Nos.1 to 6 have arrived at amicable settlement. Joint statement regarding settlement has been recorded separately. The said statement is reproduced hereunder:- “Stated that the parties have effected amicable settlement in the case. Projections in dispute raised by the appellants are 20 inches in width. According to settlement, appellants shall demolish the projections to the extent of half width i.e 10 inches and shall retain the projections of 10 inches width only. Necessary demolition to this effect shall be done within one month. Thereupon the claim of the respondents shall stand satisfied. However, if the appellants fail to demolish the projections to the aforesaid extent within one month, the appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed. The appeal be disposed of accordingly.” RSA. No.2776 of 2008 -2- The appeal has thus been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the above statement which shall form part of the decree-sheet. 05.08.2010. ( L. N. MITTAL ) A. Kaundal JUDGE