IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL. B. RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2008 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12220 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ACCELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO. LTD. EP/IV/513, EZHUPUNNA P.O., ALAPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT, CDR.RAJU MATHEW BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, KPFC BHAWAN, C.V.RAMANPILLAI ROAD, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. BY SRI. T.K. KUNHABDULLA -SC FOR R1. SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN – SC FOR R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL. B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.12220 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims to be a High Tension consumer of electrical energy for the purpose of seafood processing and freeze drying process. According to it, such establishments were categorised as HT I, while the tariff revision proposal was made by the Commission, however that in the final tariff order, they have been classified as HT IV Commercial category. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P6 statutory petition for review of that decision. It is stated that on 17.4.2008 certain matters relating to commercial consumers in the sector of seafood process who are low tension consumers are being considered by the Commission. It is directed that if Ext.P6 is received and is pending, the same will also be taken and appropriately considered, if the petitioner makes appropriate appearance before the Commission. The writ petition is disposed of as above. THOTTATHIL. B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE Acd