IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1786 of 2008 ARJUN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS ----------- 2. 19.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner had come to this court earlier originally challenging the charge memo and the notice given to him of difference of opinion with the enquiry report as also for quashing those finding in the enquiry report indicting him. It appears from Para 36 of the counter affidavit that during pendency of the writ application the departmental proceedings have been completed and final orders of punishment have been passed. The writ application has therefore become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. If so advised the petitioner may challenge the final order of punishment in a freshly constituted writ application. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)