1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 500 OF 2006 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 1052 OF 2006 IN REJECTED WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. MARCH 01, 2006. Heard Shri Khapre, learned counsel for the petitioner – applicant and Shri Madkholkar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 for sometimes. Shri Jaiswal, learned AGP appears for respondent No.2. After hearing the counsels, I find that ULP Complaint of which the impugned order was challenged in rejected Writ Petition is still pending. It will not be, therefore, proper for this Court in the facts and circumstances of the case now prevailing to interfere with that interlocutory order at this stage. In view of this, I find that the arguments being advanced need not be considered in more details. In the interest of justice, delay of 345 days in filing Misc. Civil Application St. No. 1052 of 2006 2 is condoned subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- to High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur, within a period of two weeks from today. If the costs are so paid, office to register MCA St. No.1052 of 2006. Misc. Civil Application No. 1052 of 2006 This Court by separate order condoned the delay. If the costs as ordered therein are paid and this MCA is restored, the order dated 17.1.2005 passed by the Additional Registrar shall stand set aside and the rejected Writ Petition No. 77 of 2005 shall stand restored back to file. REJECTED WRIT PETITION NO. 77 OF 2005 In view of the observations made above, the order impugned herein is only interlocutory order passed in ULP Complaint. Said ULP Complaint is still pending. I find that the matter before the Labour Court is already fixed for recording of evidence. In such circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter in writ jurisdiction. The proceedings in said ULP Complaint No. 169 of 2003 pending on the file of Labour Court, Akola are 3 expedited and the Labour Court is directed to decide the said complaint finally on merits as early as possible and in any case within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order to it. In view of these directions, nothing survives in writ petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.