IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 27714 of 2007(Y) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- MARKOSE P.V., S/O VARGHESE, AGED 62 YEARS, PALAKKAL HOUSE, OCHANTHURUTHU P.O., VYPEEN-682508. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 3. TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOCHI. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.27714/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE PHOCOPY OF THE RELEVANT ORDER UNDER RULE 15(1) OF 3RD RESPONDENT BEARING NO.L.O.547/1968. EXT.P2: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT ON REGISTRY ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT NIL. EXT.P3: TRUE PHOCOPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS PAID BY THE petitioner FOR THE ABOVE EXTENT OF LAND. EXT.P4: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS VIDE REFERENCE NO.A2C/839/91 DT 31.12.1991. EXT.P5: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE INTIMATION ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT 15.10.2004. EXT.P6: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.5024/07 DT 14.2.2007. EXT.P7: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT ORDER DT 30.7.2007. EXT.P8: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDNETS DT 1.8.2007. EXT.P8(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 27714 OF 2007 (Y) ==================== Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance is regarding the land value fixed in Ext.P1 assignment order passed by the 3rd respondent. It is seen that aggrieved by this, the petitioner has already approached the 2nd respondent by filing Ext.P8. 2. Taking into account the pendency of Ext.P8 appeal filed by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P8 with notice to the petitioner and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp