HIGH CO U’RT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W'rit Petitim: § S} N6. 3955 611098 J’ETjuTgQNEg i KP. Patel aged ’4'9 years son of Shri Tikaram Patel? 4 Ma1saya Palan Prascsr AaIyakwLa' Matsaya Ixrlshak Vtkaeh Ablukaran Amwara Block Dhamdha, D1str1ct- Duro (CG} VERSUb . State of Chhattlsgam Through Secremry knshl' (Matsaya Palan) Vlbhag, Raipm I Director F1shene‘; State (Jovt 0t Chhamsgarh Tmhandha, Ralpur (CG) 3. ' Commmmner Rap/a Nnvachan Ayag, DKS Bhavan Rama; (CG) ; 4. Tarkcshwar Vsrma, Matsaya Palan Prashar i Karyakarfa, Hasda Block Berla. (WRH‘ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITU’HUN OF INDIA} (SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt Advocate for the State. RES?0NDENTS ORAL ORoER (Passed on this 24‘“ day omuly, 2098) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. V2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this Stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make. a representation before the concerned authority within a period ofthree days and\the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3. Shri Sao,‘ learned counsel appearing tor the State, submits that if the representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the concerned authority, in accordance withlaw, on its ownmerits, within a period ot’two weeks from the date ot‘receipt ofrepresentation. . Shri Sao further submits that no coercive steps shall be taken, till the disposal ot‘the representation, 5. In view ofthe foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. NO order asto costs. . Consequently, IA No ()l application tor grant of interim rehet also stands disposed 0t 7/» t "A Satish K. Agnihmlli‘ Judge K (/2/ " r~,—a—'-“*~""‘ \ i r g i" Sci/- i di‘tfi‘t ‘ .