HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.20452 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner, who is a Constable in Central Reserve Police Force, seeks directions by way of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in allotting the land to an extent of Acs.5.00 covered by Survey No.19-10 situated in Kalavagunta Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, in favour of the fourth respondent-APIIC as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that he was assigned and granted patta for the aforesaid land vide patta No.470, dated 17.11.2005. It is submitted that though the petitioner is the owner and possessor by virtue of patta granted to him, the said land was allotted to the fourth respondent along with some others, which is illegal and arbitrary. When the matter came up for consideration on 18.08.2010, it was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader for Revenue to get instructions. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Government Pleader has produced written instructions, dated 18.08.2010, issued in Roc.No.A/801/2010, stating that originally the land in question was assigned in favour of the petitioner by issuing DKT patta, but as he violated the conditions of patta by not cultivating the land from the date of assignment, the Tahsildar by order, dated 29.01.2010, issued in Roc.No.A/56/2010, cancelled the assignment in his favour and resumed the land to the Government. It is submitted that after resuming the said land, the same was allotted to the fourth respondent-APIIC, which in turn has transferred the said land to NTPC-BHEL Power Projects Private Limited, which manufactures power equipments. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 5 and Sri P.Roy Reddy, learned counsel for the fourth respondent. The order, dated 29.01.2010, passed by the Tahsildar in Roc.No.A/56/2010, cancelling assignment of the land in question in favour of the petitioner is not under challenge in this writ petition. Further, it is to be noticed that the subsequent allottee of the land question i.e., NTPC-BHEL Power Projects Private Limited, a joint venture company, is not made a party respondent to the writ petition. In that view of the matter, no directions as prayed for can be granted. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Tahsildar, dated 29.01.2010, in Roc.No.A/56/2010, it is open to him to avail the appropriate remedies available to him under law to question the said order. Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) Dt.25.08.2010. VGB