RSA No.1876 of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1876 of 2007 Date of Decision:17.08.2010 Jaswinder Singh & anr. .... appellants Versus Rakesh Kumar & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.H.S.Grewal,Advocate for the appellant Mr.Vivek Verma, Advocate for the respondents **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This is plaintiffs' second appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the Lower Appellate Court, whereby the declaration in favour of the plaintiff-appellants granted by the trial Court that they have become owners of the suit land by way of adverse possession, was set aside. This Court in the case of Bhim Singh & Ors. Versus Zile Singh & Ors. 2006(3)RCR Civil 97 and State of Haryana versus Mukesh Kumar & ors.RSA No.3909 of 2008 has authoritatively held that a suit for declaration on the basis of adverse plea is not maintainable on behalf of the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the appellant was unable to controvert RSA No.1876 of 2007 2 the aforesaid well settled proposition of law. In this view of the matter, I find no merit in this appeal. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 17.08.2010 neenu