IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1665 (MS) of 2009 Pulkit Arya …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no. 1 and 2. Dated: September 25, 2009 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for direction to the respondent no. 2 to allow the admission to the petitioner in BAMS Course 2009-10. During the course of the argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is topper in Ayush Pre- Medical Test-2009 (UAPMT-2009) in OBC category and he has been granted valid fresh caste certificate. He confined his prayer to the extent that his representation-dated 15.09.2009 (contained in Annexure-4 to the writ petition) may be decided by the respondent no. 2 expeditiously. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel does not have any objection to this prayer. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that respondent no. 2 shall decide the representation-dated 15.09.2009 (contained in Annexure-4 to the writ petition) of the petitioner expeditiously. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Let a certified copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties today itself on payment of usual charges. (V.K. Bist, J.) VKG 25.09.2009