IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2061 OF 2008 Shakeel Hasan Patni .... Petitioner V/s. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors. .....Respondents Mr.Jaideep Mitra a/w Munir Merchant, for the Petitioner. J.G.Reddy, for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mrs.S.M.Modale, for respondent Nos.5 & 6. Mr.M.V.Pandey, for respondent No.7. Mr.S.G.Surana, for respondent No.8. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C. 1. The learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is eligible to get accommodation on the basis of the scheme undertaken by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. During the course of hearing, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has shown willingness to approach the respondent-corporation with necessary evidence in connection with the eligibility of the petitioner and to point out as to whether he is eligible as per the scheme to get the transit accommodation and permanent accommodation later on. 2. Permission to approach the respondent-corporation by way of such representation is granted. The petitioner to make representation before the respondent-corporation within a period of two weeks from today. The respondent-corporation shall consider the eligibility of the petitioner after considering the evidence on record. If the decision of the respondent- corporation is adverse to the petitioner, it will be open to the petitioner to approach High Power Committee in this behalf. The High Power Committee shall take decision in this regard within a period of four months from the receipt of the application/representation from the petitioner. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for respondent No.8 states that the developer will provide transit accommodation to the petitioner, irrespective of the fact that whether he is eligible or not or alternatively may offer compensation to the petitioner. He further states that till transit accommodation is made available to the petitioner or compensation is paid to the petitioner, if any, the structure of the petitioner will not be demolished. However, in the eventuality of giving transit accommodation or payment of compensation, the respondent No.6 thereafter, will proceed for demolition of petitioner's premises. No arguments other than the above, is canvassed before us. In view of what is stated hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of. Ad-interim order granted earlier stands vacated. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )