FORM- I NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON AFTER ADMISSION (SEE RULE 18) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: GOPALAKRISNA TAMADA CONTEMPT CASE No.141 of 2003 Between: Smt.Koyyapu Suramma PETITIONER AND 1. K.Ramayamma 2. K.Satyanarayana 3. K.NarasingaRao 4. The Superintending Engineer, I&CAD, Z.P.Junction Visakhapatnam. 5. Sri.G.RamamohanaRao, Executive Engineer, I&CAD, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram –2. 6. The Assistant Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury Office, Vizianagaram. RESPONDENTS TO 1. The Superintending Engineer, I&CAD, Z.P.Junction Visakhapatnam. 2. Sri.G.RamamohanaRao, Executive Engineer, I&CAD, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram –2. WHEREAS your attendance is necessary to answer the charges of the Contempt of Court viz. to punish the respondent authorities for violating the judgement of the High Court in CMA No.2778/1998, dt.28-11-201, with a consequential direction to pay all benefits that the petitioner is entitled to including the arrears of pension forthwith You viz, 1. The Superintending Engineer, I&CAD, Z.P.Junction Visakhapatnam. 2. Sri.G.RamamohanaRao, Executive Engineer, I&CAD, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram –2. Are hereby required to appear in person before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad on the Twenty ninth day of April 2004 at 10.30 A.M. and show cause why you shall not be punished or other appropriate order be not passed against you for Contempt of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. You shall attend High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in person on 29-04-2004 at 10.30 A.M. and shall continue to attend the High Court on all days thereafter to which date the case against you stand as adjourned and until final orders are passed on the charge against you, and this Court further made the following Order: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar) Admit, Registry is directed to issue notice to fourth and fifth respondents directing them to appear before this Court at 10.30 a.m. on 29-04-2004. Continued…. …2… The sixth respondent is represented by a counsel and filed counter stating that she was not a party either to the O.S. or to the appeal and she is only arrayed as party respondent in the present contempt case. Further, fourth and fifth respondents are the officers concerned to implement the orders of this Court and the Sixth respondent has no objection to pass the bill for payment to the petitioner on the orders of fourth and fifth respondents. In the circumstances, the presence of the sixth respondent is dispensed with. List the contempt case under the caption for appearance on 29-4- 2004. DEPUTY REGISTRAR To, 1. The District Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. (In duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit for service on the respondent No.4 and return to the High Court before 29-04-2004) 2. The District Judge, Vizianagaram District. ((In duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit for service on the respondent No.5 and return to the High Court before 29-04-2004) 3. The Superintending Engineer, I&CAD, Z.P.Junction Visakhapatnam. 4. Sri.G.RamamohanaRao, Executive Engineer, I&CAD, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram –2. (By speed post along with a copy of petition & Affidavit) 5. Two spare copies. jsw HIGH COURT JC J & TGK J DATE: 29-03-2004 NOTE: POST ON 29-04-2004 FOR APPEARANCE OF RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT AT 10.30 A.M. NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE C.C.NO.141 OF 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: GOPALAKRISNA TAMADA CONTEMPT CASE No.141 of 2003 (Contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent authorities for violating the judgement of the Hon’ble Court in C.M.A.No.2778/1998 dt.28-11-2001, with a consequential direction to pay all the benefits that the petitioner is entitled to including the arrears of pension forth with.) Between: Smt.Koyyapu Suramma PETITIONER AND 1. K.Ramayamma 2. K.Satyanarayana 3. K.NarasingaRao 4. The Superintending Engineer, I&CAD, Z.P.Junction Visakhapatnam. 5. Sri.G.RamamohanaRao, Executive Engineer, I&CAD, Vizianagaram Division, Vizianagaram –2. 6. The Assistant Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury Office, Vizianagaram. RESPONDENTS FOR THE PETITIONER: MR.S.SRIRAMACHANDRA MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.6: MR.VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI, ADVOCATE The Court made the following ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar) Admit, Registry is directed to issue notice to fourth and fifth respondents directing them to appear before this Court at 10.30 a.m. on 29-04-2004. The sixth respondent is represented by a counsel and filed counter stating that she was not a party either to the O.S. or to the appeal and she is only arrayed as party respondent in the present contempt case. Further, fourth and fifth respondents are the officers concerned to implement the orders of this Court and the Sixth respondent has no objection to pass the bill for payment to the petitioner on the orders of fourth and fifth respondents. In the circumstances, the presence of the sixth respondent is dispensed with. List the contempt case under the caption for appearance on 29-4- 2004. Ss/-P.VANA KUMARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY // Section Officer To, 1. The Assistant Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury Office,Vizianagaram (By speed post along with a copy of petition & Affidavit) 2. Two Spare copies. jsw HIGH COURT JC J & TGK J DATE: 29-03-2004 NOTE: LIST THE CONTEMPT CASE UNDER THE CAPTION FOR APPEARANCE ON 29-04-2004. ORDER C.C.NO.141 OF 2003 DISPENSING WITH THE PRESENCE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.6