EFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF BILASPUR LLANT N—APPLICANT NO 2 ‘ ' Through Branch Manager ‘ \ Insurance Campan, Raendxa aga Chowk B11aspur ) ’V‘ERSIUIS, 1' k}; Hetram Sa‘hu; aed about‘ ears", .sQno Mayaram Sahu, ' {2 i ed bdt 38 year's Wife ‘ Nonibai ‘Sahl,’ ag au , RTS ESPONDEN K11 Rekha aged 1 Hetram Sah d d 0 dh i j Ku Geeta about 1 years augter ~‘A11 res1dent o Vlage Jaljalpur 1sr1ct anJgII-Cham {a (Chhattlsgarh) prese B CI v PE O y j Nr (C G ‘ g 39‘ iy ‘f 4 years daughter of u f ll Dt ‘E’J nt XI-HC—78 3am, Wm, ,wo. ..o... o..o... WW W ‘ Cc). ‘ss’qéoé a1 00 @ . WW (W) W WW matwm WW wW = $a§wm 18.09.200E Shri H. B. Agrawal, learnet !earned counsel for the appel!ant. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the ar preferred by the appeilant/lnsuranc arising out of the same accident h; dated 19-6-2006 ‘l have perused the impugned z award and grounds of appeal. This appeal has been prefern on the ground that the driver of the r have driving licence at the time of has faiied to substantiate that piea considering the facts and circumstar appeal is devoid of substance and stage. i Sr. Counsel with Ku. Sangeeta Mishra, >pellant submits that MA. No. 708/2006 e Company against the impugned award is been dismissed by this Court vide order ad by the appellant/insurance Company only motor vehicle involved in the accident did not laccident. However the insurance Company by adducing any evidenCe, therefore, after Ices of the case. l am of the opinion that the merit and the same is dismissed at motion Sd/ - Dhirendra Misma Judge P.T.O. - r,g WW W