IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2018 of 2010 SANJAY RAI S/O SRI SHYAM NANDAN RAI R/O VILL. & P.O. RAMPUR SHYAMCHAND, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 5. SMT. KIRAN KUMARI D/O SRI SARAU PRASAD R/O VILLAGE & P.O. RAMUR SHYAMCHAND, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR ----------- 02. 03.12.2010 Annexure-9 is the order by virtue of which one Kiran Kumari has been saddled with the responsibility of operating the account of the school instead of the petitioner. Claim of the petitioner is that he is senior to Kiran Kumari and therefore he has right to operate the account. In absence of any constitutional or statutory right having been established by the petitioner to perform the nature of the duty which he is looking for, there is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the impugned order (Annexure-9). Seniority or juniority is another issue which can be sorted out in another proceeding if the petitioner so wants. The writ application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)