IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 16624 of 2008 Between: Yakula Govardhan S/o.Y.Rajasekhar rep.by its father and Natural Guardian Y.Rajashekar R/o.Rampuram(V) Mantralayam(M) Kurnool District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Techonologies Rep.by its Deen (Governing Council) Besides Telephone Bhavan Saifabad Hyderabad 2 Stateof A.P rep.by its Principal Secretary Higher Education Department Secretariat Hyderabad 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Adoni Town Kurnool District 4 The Tahasildar Taluq Officer Pattikonda(M) Kurnool District 5 S.Venkatesh S/o.S.Appayya Jonnagiri Z.P High School(V) Tuggai(M) Kurnool District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not including the name of the petitioner in the provisional list /final list for admission in to I.I.I.T(RGUKT) in Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Techonologies and admit him to the course by declaring the action of his non selection as arbitary illegal and void and pending disposal of above wp to direct the respondents to reserve one seat belonging to BC D category in Rayalaseema Region for admission into I.I.I.T at Kadapa under the 1st respondent University or in other two universitys and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.H.SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 16624 of 2008 O R D E R : Since there was no representation for the petitioner on 22-04-2009, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-04-2009 KLP