IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.31536 of 2011 BETWEEN Shaik Rahamath Bee. ... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Kadapa and five others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. M.N. NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: ORDER: Petitioner states that she has already given representation on 14.02.2011 for restoration of her assigned land followed up by another representation dated 22.08.2011. However, on the ground that the fourth respondent is in possession, the petitioner was given a notice under Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 2007 dated 18.10.2011. 2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that after considering the explanation, orders are likely to be passed by the Tahsildar with regard to the show cause notice, referred to above. 3. Since petitioner as well as the contesting respondents are said to have ﬁled their explanation/replies to the show cause notice together with the pendency of petitioner’s applications for restoration of possession, referred to above, it would be just and appropriate to direct the third respondent to consider the applications of the petitioner along with the reply to the show cause notice and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties including the private party respondents herein, within two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 7, 2011 DSK