Coy. Appeal No. 1 of 2005. 17.03.2008 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.4 and 5. Coy. Application No. 40 of 2007. We have been informed by the learned Counsel for the applicant that the applicant has purchased the property in question when the same was put to auction by the Court itself. The sale deed has been executed in the light of the directions issued by this Court. However, the revenue authorities are sitting over on certain entries and they have not corrected the same, though the application of the applicant is pending for the last two and half years. Interest of justice will suffice, if the revenue authority shall ensure the disposal of the application pending. Accordingly, we direct the revenue authority concerned to dispose the application of the applicant in accordance with law and various orders passed by this Court, i.e. within a period of three months from the date the certified copy of this order is served upon the authority concerned. In the light of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the applicant the application has become infructuous. Order accordingly. Costs easy. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. March 17, 2008. ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (tr)