1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6967 OF 2010 Mir Saheb Sheru Sahsb Deshmukh ... PETITIONER VERSUS The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri M.V. Ghatge, Advocate for the petitioner Shri N.N. Jadhav, A.G.P. for State Shri G.R. Ingole Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 to 10 ..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 11th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. A motion of no confidence has been passed against the petitioner, who was holding the office of Sarpanch of Village Panchayat, by majority of more than two-third of the members. The resolution of no confidence adopted by the members of the Village Panchayat was a matter of challenge before the Collector in an appeal by the petitioner. It is the contention of the petitioner that, although a notice was issued in respect of holding of meeting at the office of Village Panchayat, however, the venue of the meeting was changed and the same was held at a different place i.e. at a school. It has resulted in failure of the petitioner in attending the meeting, which has caused serious 2 prejudice to the petitioner. The very fact of holding of meeting at the school, as contended by the petitioner, is controverted by the respondents. The text of the resolution also indicates that the meeting was actually held at the office of the Village Panchayat. Considering that the petition raises disputed questions of facts, in exercise of powers conferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for. The petition is devoid of merits, hence, same stands dismissed. R.M. BORDE JUDGE fmp/wp6967.10