:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.264 OF 2003 NO.264 OF 2003 NO.264 OF 2003 IN IN IN CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.903 OF 2001 SUMMONS NO.903 OF 2001 SUMMONS NO.903 OF 2001 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.4150 OF 1997 NO.4150 OF 1997 NO.4150 OF 1997 Chandrakant Kalikdas Shah ..Appellant Vs. Vs. Vs. M/s.Veetrag Investment & Finance Company ..Respondent Vs. Vs. Vs. M/s.Premier Brass and Metal Works (Pvt.) Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.M.K.Khatri for the Appellant. Mr.V.B.Naik with Mr.Kantawala i/b.Kantawala & Co.for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & R.S.MOHITE,JJ. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. R.S.MOHITE,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER,2007 : 21ST NOVEMBER,2007 : 21ST NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Naik, the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 states that the very judgment which is impugned in this Appeal has been upheld and confirmed by a Full Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Tangerine Tangerine Tangerine Electronics Electronics Electronics Systems Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Indian Chemicals, Systems Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Indian Chemicals, Systems Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Indian Chemicals, Mumbai Mumbai Mumbai 2004(2) Mh.L.J. 305. 2004(2) Mh.L.J. 305. 2004(2) Mh.L.J. 305. In view thereof, the present Appeal has become infructuous. Hence, the same stands dismissed. 2. In view of the dismissal of the above Appeal, the Chamber Summons No.903 of 2001 also stands dismissed. The Applicant to the Chamber Summons is permitted to take out appropriate proceeding as permissible in law. (R.S.MOHITE,J.) (R.S.MOHITE,J.) (R.S.MOHITE,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)