IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31192 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER ---------- POOKUNJU,S/O.PAREETH KUNJU,AGED 60 YEARS PUTHENPURAYIL PUNNAKULAM,AADINAD VILLAGE, K.S.PURAM PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVs. SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR SRI.HARISH R. MENON SMT.M.S.KIRAN RESPONDENTS ----------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM ,PIN 695 004. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN 695 004. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC DIVISION,THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 690 518. 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN 690 518. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. RINNY STEPHEN R2 BY ADV. SRI. SAJEEVKUMAR K. GOPAL, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dlk WP(C).No. 31192 of 2011(Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE LOCATION AND SITE WHEREIN THE POSTS HAVE BEEN ERECTED FOR INSTALLING THE TRANSFORMER. EXHIBIT P2- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 8-10-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 3-11-2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE dlk ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 31192 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is complaining about the transformer that has been installed near the TB Hospital Junction at Karunagapally. He has also filed Ext.P2 request to the 4th respondent for its shifting. 2. In this writ petition what is sought for by the petitioner is an order for the consideration of the representation. Although the standing counsel points out that the materials produced by the petitioner does not indicate any justification for the shifting, still it is a matter essentially for the 4th respondent to consider. 3. Therefore, I direct the 4th respondent to consider the request of the petitioner evidenced by Ext.P2 and that orders thereon will be passed at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge