HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1220 of 2010 (M/S) Km. Mamta Joshi (Minor) .…Petitioner Versus Board of School Education Uttarakhand ...Respondent Mr. Girish Chandra Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Seema Sah, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondent to revaluate/scrutinize the copies/answer sheets of all subjects of Intermediate Examination, 2010 and also for issuance of new mark sheet to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner appeared in Intermediate Examination, 2010 with the subjects Hindi, English, Geography, Economics and Pol. Science from D.S. Govt. Inter College, Peora, Nainital. Her roll number was 083831. He further submitted that the petitioner has excellent academic career. She also did very well in her papers but marks awarded to her are less than her expectation. Therefore, she applied for scrutiny and deposited the requisite fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that in these circumstances the answer sheet of the petitioner be revalued. This prayer of the petitioner cannot be allowed in view of the fact that there is no rule which provides 2 revaluation and also in view of the law laid down in the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in (1984)4 Supreme Court Cases 27, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Seth & Others. However, since the petitioner has applied for the scrutiny and deposited the requisite fee in time, respondent is directed to scrutinize the answer sheets of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order. The writ petition is disposed of. Interim Relief Application No.5707 of 2010 also stands disposed of. (V.K.Bist. J,) 16.07.2010 Arti 3