IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17344 of 2007 1. Ash Narayan Singh Son of Late Ram Ishwar Singh 2. Jitendra Singh, son of Ash Narayan Singh 3. Biteshwar Singh, son of Ash Narayan Singh 4. Bittu Singh, Son of Ash Narayan Singh 5. Shivaji Singh, Son of Late Ram Ishwar Singh All ( 1 to 5 ) are resident of Village- Rampur Diyara, P.S.Maner, District-Patna 6. Vishwanath Singh Son of Raj Kishore Singh, resident of Mohalla –Durga Mandir, Boring Road,Patna and Raja Bazar Sahpur , P.S. Budha Colony, District-Patna --------------------- Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Bebi Devi, Wife of Om Prakash Singh , resident of Village- Dhmar, P.S. Ara Muffasil, District-Bhojpur ------------------ Opp.Parties. ----------- 6 13-07-2009 This application was heard along with Cr.Misc.No.13471 of 2007 and during its pendency it was submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise and, therefore, these matters should be disposed of on the basis of compromise. From perusal of the records, it appears that in Cr.Misc.No.13471 of 2007 the petitioners have sought to impugn the order whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 395 and 412 I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act and the affirmation thereof in Cr.Revision No.65 of 2005. Moreover, it appears that the case has already been committed to the Court of Sessions where it is numbered as Sessions Trial No.57 of 2006, the quashing whereof has also been prayed for. Since the offences, whereunder cognizance has been taken, are not compoundable, no compromise so far as Cr.Misc.No.13471 of 2007 can be recorded. - 2 - So far as Cr.Misc.No.17344 of 2007 are concerned, heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary , the learned counsel for Opp.Party no.2 , the complainant of Complaint Case No.1404( C) of 2006. Both the learned counsels have submitted and agreed that the parties have already entered into a compromise and a proper compromise petition will be filed in the court of Sri B.Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ara or his successor in the office within a period of three weeks positively In the event such a compromise petition is filed, the learned trial court will dispose of the matter keeping in view the fact that the parties have settled their disputes and differences and Sections 406,420, 506 and 120B I.P.C. whereunder cognizance has been taken are compoundable. In the result Cr.Misc.No.17344 of 2007 is disposed of in terms stated above with liberty to the parties to file a compromise petition in the court below within three weeks peremptory. So far Cr.Misc.No.13471 of 2007 is concerned; it shall be decided on merits. NKS/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)