IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No. M-27817/2010(O&M) Date of decision: 21.9.2010. Kuldip Singh Lambardar ....................Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.HS Dhindsa,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Prayer under Section 438 Cr.PC is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.142 dated 6.8.2010 under Sections 419, 466, 467, 471, 200, 205, 120-B IPC, PS Tanda, Distt.Hoshiarpur. It is apparent from the record that one Panna Lal was accused in case FIR No.109 dated 29.5.2006 under Sections 307, 326, 324, 148, 149 IPC, PS Tanda. He was granted bail on furnishing of bail bonds and surety bonds. He furnished surety bonds of one Manjit Singh son of Hardial Singh resident of Village Masitpal. During trial accused Panna Lal jumped bail resulting into forfeiture of his bonds and notice to surety. It was then noticed that the surety of Manjit Singh son of Hardial Singh was found to be false. As per allegations in the present FIR petitioner-Kuldip Singh Lambardar has identified one Manjit Singh son of Jaswant Singh resident of Village Kharal Khurd as Manjit Singh son of Hardial Singh resident of Village Masitpal, who was owner of the land as stated in the surety bond. It is not in dispute that till today Panna Lal is an absconder. Learned counsel has referred to order dated 14.9.2010 (P1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court whereby in a subsequent FIR on identical allegations petitioner has been granted interim bail. It is evident from a perusal of the aforesaid order that the aforesaid facts were not brought to the notice of the Court. Be that as it may, keeping in view the nature and gravity of the allegations, no ground for anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. 21.9.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge