^.v^^^^- HIGH COUR^ OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIlAjPUR WRIT PETmONrS^ No. 4930 of2008 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Smt. Ritei Surange W/o Uday Surange, Aged about 46 years, occupatioti Principal Govemment Hi^i School Tulsi Baradora, District Raipur (C.G.) VER8U8 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throu^i the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Raipisr District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer^ Raipur, Distriot Raipur (C.G.) WMTPETTTIQNUlSIDERARTICyBS 226/227 OF THE CONSnTmiON_aFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. l1'!^^ Present: Sfari Anil Gulati-, Advocate fbr the petitioxier. Sliri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govenuiient Advoeate fortfae State/respondeiits. ORALORDER (Passed on 08" day of Septemba-, 2008) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up fw hearmg fmally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instmetiQn, submils that Ae petitioner does not want to contest tfais matter on merit. However, the petitioner may be permitted to file a rq)resentation before the respondent-aiithorities, in light ofthe judgment and order dated 03.04.2006 passed in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR<;G 96). 3. Shri Bhatia; leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits fhat in the event a rq>resentation is made, the same shall be considared and deeided in accordance wifh law; on its own merits, within a period offour weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 4. hi view ofthe above, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto eosts. Aamt Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge