IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 334 of 2009 Pankaj Rawat and another ........... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ............ Respondents ............... Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, Asst. Govt. Advocate for the State. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Advocate and upon perusal of the material placed on record, I do not find any ground warranting quashing of the First Information Report. The petition deserves to be dismissed. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 08.06.2009 A