II»ICTI «t*<ith ~5^ ^l^l^l^, ^)Tl1-!HII<o, f®l<rtl-y^< ^j^..^.<;j.2......^a..i.y. •^200 ^rr^r XR^ ( ^I^^T) ^I^T ^)T'RprbF ^?T 3TT^?T sti^w '^TTW^ri^f 3TI^T PETITIONER Mathura agcd ab< Veteiiiiai' V^rsias RESPONDENTS 1. State of ( Veterinary Maiitrala^^ 2. Director, V 3. Joint Uu BUaspur ((?G) WntPetitioniinderMtiele S.B. Hon'fele Shri Dhirendra Mi 16-10-2008 Shri Gautain Bhadun, cou Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy GA Grievance of the petitionei were workiiig as Swachchaka^ Veteriiiaiy Servdces, Bilaspur u| Director, vide order dated 12.5. pay-scale to the petitioner arid was subsequently witlidrawn P/ 11) passed by the Jouit Di^ Being aggrieved by flie above or| writ petition (s) No.3264 of 200^ ohS^fd^l'l T?m^f ^* fe^t <f^^i< ^ ^itRlH 3T1^[ |Prasad Khare, S/o GuharaiH Khare, ^ut 40 ycars, Occupation Swccpcr- Hospital-Baror, Distilct Bilaspur (CG) phhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Departinent DKS Bhawaii, k, Raipur (CG). leterinaiy Services, Raipur (CG) lector, Vetermary Services District 226 ofthe Constitutioa oflndia shra^ J. asel for Uie petitioner. tlie State. fcr is that tiie petitioner and other uiiie iii the office of flie Dy. Director, tider tiie State Goveriiment. The Dy. 1.999 (Anuexure P/8), graiited rcgular ^ther employees. However, the sam.e v|ide order dated 9.2.2000 (Annexure t'ector, Veteriiiaiy Services, BUaspur. tler, one Vishnu Prasad Daliire filed a >$ before tih.is Court and fhe same was ?1T^7T 8N^T^||^, ?T5R^-m^—FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. ;^5^fe^. /.^ '^ .^^s^- % 1^sy^ t W^T ^)T ^Jcb WT ^H^T si»*iich ^l 11*1^1 CT»11<t» T^T T<ji^i<n^, ^Til^ji<o, [®scni^^< . ^-^.c^ S^3-7 "Wl 200 ^ ^n^?i ^r^ ('4Gi(i<si^) WTOT Tlf^T 3TT^l allowed vide. order dated 28til held eiititled for regular pay-i Jjily, 2006 (Annexure P/ 13) aad he was sc4e w.e.f. 12th May, 1999. Leamed counsel for tlid petltion may also be disposed oj of Vishnu Pf'asad Dahire (supra)) On the otlier harid, leani^ case the petitioiier files represei shall be considered aiid decidedl the order passed ui the case of Iii view of above submis$ tlie iiistaiit petition is disposed a detailed representation befoijc grievaiices raised ui tliis petitio|a. tlie saoie shaU be considered m ternis of the order pass^d expeditiously. CM^I<^<fll ^FI^f ^ ft^ TN^TC ^r 3tRm 3?n^?T petitioner submits tih.at Uie uistaiit m temls of order passed ui the niatter d counsel for the State submits tliat in -tation agaiast his grievances, the sanie by tiie competent auftiorifry ui terais of Ushnu Prasad Dahire (supra). lons of leamed counsel for the pardes, ofwith UberU' to tlie petitioner to make the respondent No.3, raismg aU his L. On such representation being made, ad decided by the competent autliority ui Vishnu Prasad Dahire (supra.) Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ?iT^7T ^r^ ^uii^, ^i^i<Jii<=< —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000.