IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4913 of 2008 Naresh Kumar Kaushik Vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula & others Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.Som Nath Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has challenged the appointment of respondent No.3 for the post of Lineman (Practical) Instructor in Industrial Training & Vocational Education Department, Haryana. As per the petitioner, respondent No.3 has been appointed in the category of Ex-servicemen, but was not eligible in terms of the experience and qualification prescribed. In response to a notice of motion, reply has been filed. It is rather pointed out that the petitioner was also considered, but was found less meritorious. It is also pointed out that respondent No.3 possesses the Trade Proficiency Certificate in Electrical Fitter Signals and had seventeen years service experience in the Army for the performance of these duties. Counsel for respondent No.3 has referred to certificate, Annexure R-3/1 issued by the Corps of Signals. Mr.Rathee says that this certificate has been considered and the same would satisfy the requirement of the qualification and also the experience of the petitioner as prescribed in the advertisement for the post. Rather, in the reply it is disclosed that the petitioner did not have the requisite qualification as he was only working as a Clerk (Stores Keeper). I do not find any cause or reason to interfere in the writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. July 26, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE