-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 8450 of 2009 M/s. Aditya Diamonds & Others. ..Petitioners. Versus Small Industries Development Bank of India. ..Respondent. Mr. S. B. Nagar i/b M/s. Global Law Offices for the Petitioners. Coram : S. B. Mhase & R. M. Savant, JJ. Date : October 8, 2009. P. C. : 1. Heard. The Petitioner has challenged the order dated 25th August 2009 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai in M. A. No. 178 of 2009 in Appeal No. 59 of 2009. By the impugned order the Petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 1 crore with the Registrar of the Appellate Tribunal. This order is in consonance with the provisions of the Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. No case for interference is made out. The Petitioner desires that the above-stated appeal preferred by the Petitioner should be heard without depositing the said amount, which -: 2 :- according to us would be contrary to the provisions of law. We therefore refrain from entertaining the above petition which is according rejected. 2. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner makes a request for extending the time for deposit of the said amount. We are not in favour of extending the time and the prayer to that effect is accordingly rejected. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)