HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petttion (S) No. 1936 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondente 1, Smt. Saroj Sahu, W/o Shri Maya Ram Sahu, Age about 46 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prtmary School. Jodhapur, Block - Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) SSate Govt. of Chhatttegarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department. D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. (C.G.) District Education Officer, Dlstt. ~ Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrwastava. Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1^ day of Aprit, 2008) The petitionerwas appointed initiatty, on a fixed pay of Rs. 1200/-. The petitloner was thereafter, granted regular pay scale on completjon of ttie probation period. The question of law invoh/ed herein is, asto whether the petStioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of jni'tial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State. jointly submit that the facts and question of law, involved in the present writ petitlon, are ttie same asto that of in W.P. No. 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain Vs. The State Government of Chhattisgarh snd another), which was disposed of vide order dated 10.11.2006. __ ..<^^ - 2-- 4. In view of the above-stated submissions made by tearned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petttion is disposed of in the same terms i.e. petitioner Js entitled for regular pay scale w.e.f. (he date of inftjal appojntment, subject to verification of the facts. No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge