IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1903 of 2006 Between: Smt. Reddimasi Veeramma, W/o. Hanumantha Rao, R/o. Pandurangapuram Village Palvancha Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director General of Police, Government of AP., Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Khammam, Khammam District. 3 Mr. Tirupathi Rao, Sub-Inspector of Police, Aswapuram Police Station, Aswapuram, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. A.SREEKANTH REDDY FOR MR.PALLE NAGESWAR RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners pray that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to disconnect the service connection No. A018643 installed at the premises situated at Plot No.2, Chandragiri, Annapurna Complex, Trimulgherry, Secunderabad of the Petitioner.” At the hearing, Sri A.Sreekanth Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri Palle Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.2297 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 4th JUNE, 2009. kvni