IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2009 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15300 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- AMMA CHARITABLE TRUST, IRUMPANANGAD MURI, IRUMPANANGAD P.O., KOLLAM DIST, PIN 691 505, REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, P.K. LEELAMMA. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), K.S.F.E. LTD., KOLLAM. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DIST. 3. K.P. SAJI, KUZHIYIL PUTHENVEEDU, AMBALANTHUKALA P.O., KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DIST. 4. DR. VASUMATHI, D/O. VISALAKSHI, JITH BHAVANAM, KOTHUMBIL, NEDUVATHOOR MURI, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 6. LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV.MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ............................................................... W.P.(C) No. 15300 OF 2009 .............................................................. Dated this the 3rd June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Challenging Ext.P4 order passed by the 5th respondent/District Collector, confirming the sale of the concerned property, the petitioner has approached the 6th respondent by filing Ext P5 revision petition under section 83(1) of the Revenue Recovery Act, along with Ext.P6 petition for stay. The grievance of the petitioner that coercive steps are being pursued against the petitioner on the basis of Ext.P4 order notwithstanding the pendency of the above proceedings before the sixth respondent, which hence is under challenge. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the sixth respondent is hereby directed to consider Ext.P5 memorandum of revision and Ext. P6 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. However, it is made clear that till appropriate orders are passed on Ext.P6 petition for stay, all W.P.(C) No. 15300 OF 2009 2 further coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 will be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of . P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk