1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.2945 of 1999 Bhimrao Rama Mahadik since deceased through his heirs: Shri Sitaram Bhimrao Mahadik & ors. Petitioners Vs. Shri Namdeo Manu Mang (Sakat) & ors. Respondents Mr.G.C.Sawant for petitioners. Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, AGP for resp.no.9. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. June 3, 2008 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners who had filed Revision Application No.92 of 1989 before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and the said revision has been dismissed by the impugned order dated 25/9/1997. . The petitioners had approached the ALT, Khanapur to fix the purchase price under Section 32-G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 ("the Tenancy Act" for short) and the said application was dismissed on 28/1/1985. The petitioners, therefore, filed Tenancy Appeal no.20 of 1985 which also came to be dismissed by the Sub Divisional Officer on 31/1/1986. By the impugned 2 order, the MRT has confirmed the concurrent findings recorded by the ALT as well as the SDO. . It was noted by all the authorities below that earlier, similar application was filed and the tenant was issued a notice on 24/8/1960 and the application was dismissed on 26/10/1961 and the said order was not carried in appeal by the tenant who was predecessor of the present petitioners. Under these circumstances, a fresh application could not have been filed by the tenant and, therefore, the ALT had rightly rejected the application in the second round. Hence, no interference is called for in the concurrent view of all the authorities below and, therefore, this petition must fail at the threshold. The same is hereby rejected. (B.H.MARL