IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.10357 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 19, 2010 HARDEEP KUMAR @ DEEPU ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for bail in FIR No.201 dated 20.8.2009 under Sections 324, 341, 506/34 and Section 307 (added lateron), Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Division No.5 (also known as Police Station, Civil Lines), Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that, admittedly, the petitioner has not been attributed any injury. I have considered the contention. As per the recital in the FIR, Sema, Manda, Deepu and Ravi way-laid the complainant. Sema inflicted blow on the left side of abdomen Criminal Misc. No.10357 -M of 2010 2 on the person of the complainant with a knife; Manda inflicted a blow on the right side of the abdomen of the complainant with a knife; Ravi raised a lalkara to kill and Deepu alias Hardeep Kumar (petitioner) tried to inflict a blow with a knife but the complainant ran away and the blow did not hit the complainant. It transpires that the petitioner has been in custody since 6.11.2009. Investigation has already been concluded and the challan has been filed. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, including the fact that, admittedly, the petitioner has not caused any injury on the person of the complainant and also the fact that the petitioner is a witness against the complainant in the FIR (Annexure P-2), and therefore, false implication cannot be ruled out, the petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Ludhiana. April 19, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?