IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24411 of 2008 Between: 1 Sri. M.V.S.K Appa Rao, S/o. M.V.K.N. Appa Rao, R/o. 3-A, Orchard Court, 123, Chamiers Road, R.A.Puram, CHENNAI - 28. 2 Sri M.V.P.K.K.Appa Rao, S/o. M.V.K.N. Appa Rao, R/o. 503, Nathvillae Apartments, Road No.6, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the District Collector, Krishna At Machilipatnam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nuzvid, Krishna District. 3 The Tahsildar, Nuzvid Mandal, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering and disposing of the representation made by the petitioners dated 27-06-2008 for conducting of survey and demarcation and ﬁxation of boundaries of the land to an extent of 0.70 cents situated in R.S.No.450 of Nuzvid Town of Nuzvid Mandal, Krishna District, as being illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to conduct the survey, demarcate and ﬁx the boundaries forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24411 OF 2008 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioners is that they submitted a representation dated 27.06.2008 to the 3rd respondent- Tahsildar, Nuzvid Mandal, Krishna District, seeking survey and demarcation of their land in an extent of 0.70 cents in R.S.No.450 of Nuzvid Town and Mandal, Krishna District, but the same has not been considered till date. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Since the only grievance of the petitioners is of non- consideration of their representation, without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondent- Tahsildar, Nuzvid Mandal, Krishna District, to consider the representation dated 27.06.2008 submitted by the petitioners, seeking survey and demarcation of the land referred to above, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 7th November, 2008 IBL