HIGK C01URT OF OiIiA%IS<SARH AT BILASPUR PBTITIONER BfiSP-ONDENTS-- 1. WRITPETITIQN^ No.3588 of2007 Sudarsliaii Prasad Dansena S/o Shri 0@pliram Dansena, Aged about 48 years, R/o Behmd B.R.CoId^torage, KangolrRoad, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh). .IVERS'GS ' ;. :::.::.,. : . ^ State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Scfaeduled easte,"SeKsduled Tribe and Backward Class Welfare Department D.K.S. ,Bhawaigl^itralax!atSaipur(CG) 2. The '.Comnussioiier, ^ Devetopment, . •:;:., Raipur'^3;Cj.)^: : [^y^- ! . , 3. Tte: S^eretary, •M^a: Rukamani Sewa •^^Sanstli^Sam&i,Dmiajra^Tah.&D^ . ..•.:.JagdaSmr:(C.(^).^:.,..-- s5s%21:Zt WKTTPETmONlJNKERA3Kn£^226S27:OF THE CQNSTTTUT^ OF INDIA SmgIeBenchiHon'bleJusticeShrlSafishK.Aanihotri. Present: ShriS.P.Kale,Adyocat&&i-3£epetitiorier,~. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate'for the State/respondents I aad 2 ORDER (Passed on 27°'day of June, 2007) ^I. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitkmer as well as for fhe State/respondentsjouitlysubnutthatthefactandquestionoflawinvolved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar ' BharadwajVs.MuiuclpalCorporation,Dui^andanother {2006(11) MPJR-CG 96}, whichhasbeen disposedofvide order dated 03.04:200?. "~ ^, , Leamed cQUnsel.appearingfbTflie.respondents does not coiitrovert &e saidsubmission.: , • r . ., 2..1 AccQr<lmgly,tliewritpe'titionisall6wedmtei'ms ofthe order passed in the case ofYashwant Kumar BharadwaJ Vs. Municipal Corporaflon, Durg and another (Supra), subjecfrfo verification of the faet asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed Examination Cerfificate on his own experises as per fhe circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whetherhehas beenpaidtwo advaaceincremeiitsornot.NoQrder .astocosts. : .:! • .•.-,-,' ^-:_____ Amit... Sd/- Satish K.Agniliotri Judge •^