IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.221 of 2009 Date of decision:30.03.2009. Smt. Suman Kumari and others ...Petitioners Versus Raghbir Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Gagandeep Garg, Advocate, for Mr. Pavit Singh Mattewal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Parminder Singh -I, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. (ORAL) It being common ground that the only purpose of the impugned order is to ensure that the defendants – petitioners are not able to evade the execution of the decree, if any ultimately comes to be passed, the learned counsel for the defendants – petitioners states at the bar that he is under instructions from the defendants – petitioner to state that the suit property would not be sold off till disposal of the petition. As the learned counsel has made that statement under instructions from the defendants – petitioners, it is accepted by the learned counsel for the respondent. In the light thereof, the petition shall stand allowed. The impugned shall stand set aside. However, the defendants – petitioners shall abide by the statement made today by their learned counsel. A copy of the order shall also be forwarded to the Sub Registrar, Garhshankar for compliance. Disposed of accordingly. March 30, 2009 (S.D.Anand) vinod Judge