((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.674 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.225 OF 2003 Ratan Lath HUF Plaintiff versus Purushottamlal M. Rungta Defendant S.P.Dalal i/by Dalal & Co. for plaintiff. D.D.Madon with Deyri Colobawala i/by Madekar & Co. for defendant no.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22nd June 2005 PC : 1. Heard Mr.Dalal for plaintiff and Mr.Madon for defendant. Perused the plaint and the annexures thereto. 2. In the affidavit in reply, apart from the fact that defendant denies having signed the statement, additionally, issue of limitation is also raised. Further issue raised on affidavit is pertaining to the genuineness of the Power of Attorney on the strength of which present suit is instituted. All these aspects raise triable ((-2-)) issues. Further, the plaintiff has recovered a sum of Rs.10.00 lakh. This is a fit case where unconditional leave should be granted. Suit transferred to the list of commercial causes. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)