IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37933 of 2008 MURARI YADAV S/o- Govind Yadav, R/o- Village – Farrampur, P.S.- Ariyari, District - Shaikhpura Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under sections 323, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the complainant has filed the present case with false allegation. As a matter of fact, the petitioner is always ready to keep the complainant as legally wedded wife. He further submits he filed a compromised petition in the court below. However, the complainant disputed the fact that the signature over the said compromise petition is not of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner for demand and torture has made in the complaint. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case. I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. - 2 - Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)