IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2008 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 991 of 2008() ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ SOOPPU K.K., S/O.KUHAMMED, KOODATHANKANDY HOUSE, AVADUKKA, PERUVANNAMOOZHI, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.KUNHABDULLA RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE RURAL, VADAKARA. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\ PERAMBRA POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. M/S.KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED, 4TH FLOOR, THADIKKARAN CENTRE, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI - 25. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/03/2008 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.991 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th day of March, 2008 ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that respondents No.1 and 2 namely Superintendent of Police, Kozhikode rural and Sub Inspector of Police, Perambra Police Station, who were bound to register a crime on the complaint of the petitioner alleging the commission of cognizable offences, have refused to discharge their statutory duty. Hence, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to register a crime and commence investigation. 2. The remedy of the petitioner is not to approach this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C, in the light of the recent pronouncement of the Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others 2007(13)SCALE 693. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of, leaving the petitioner to the remedy of filing a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C or by preferring a private complaint under Section 190 read with 200 Cr.P.C. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj