1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5893/2003 (Narendra Kumar Acharya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order : 18/01/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. Manish Shisodia for the petitioner. Mr. Rameshwar Dave, Dy. G.A. for the respondents. BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only grievance raised by the counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents be directed to decide the representation/ notice filed by the petitioner Annex.4 dated 25.7.2003 before the respondents in the light of judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in D.B.Special Appeal (Writ) No. 169/1998 decided on 12.2.1998 as affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 6030/98 decided on 9.9.1998 (State Vs. Kishan Kumar Pandey). It appears that after the notice dated 25.7.2003 almost thee and half years have elapsed, and therefore, it would be appropriate to direct the petitioner to make a fresh 2 representation to the respondents within 15 days from today and if the petitioner makes such a representation, the same shall be decided within three months therefrom in the light of judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in D.B.Special Appeal (Writ) No. 169/1998 decided on 12.2.1998 as affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 6030/98 decided on 9.9.1998 (State Vs. Kishan Kumar Pandey). To the extent indicated above, the writ petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp