IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3399 of 2011 Date of decision: 23.5.2011 Smt. Anju … Petitioner versus Smt. Sarabjit and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Satinder Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the grand-mother of the minor child Gautam. In a petition under the Guardian and Wards Act filed by natural mother Smt. Sarabjit, interim custody of the minor child Gautam was given to her. Smt. Anju, the grand-mother, filed an application for taking back the custody of the minor on the ground that Sarabjit has gone abroad on study visa, leaving Gautam in India. The said application has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 28.2.2011 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Division), Hoshiarpur. Hence, this revision. Heard. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that there is no dispute that Smt. Sarabjit has gone abroad on study visa but with the averment that she is returning in February 2011. The application has been dismissed vide order dated 28.2.2011, meaning thereby that by that time, she must have returned but there is no reflection in this regard in the impugned order. There is also no indication as to what is further length of her stay abroad. In this back-drop, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the Court concerned to decide the application C.R. No. 3399 of 2011 -2- afresh in accordance with law, without being influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. May 23, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE