IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33865 of 2010 MADAN PRASAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 4.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. It is stated that petitioner committed theft of paddy and also assaulted the complainant and the aforesaid misdeed was committed by petitioners on the strength of forged sale deed in respect of the land of the complainant. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that, as a matter of fact, disputed land stood in the name of the ancestor of petitioner no.1 who subsequently transferred the said land to petitioner no.2. In view of the above stated land dispute, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, it is ordered that petitioners( Madan Prasad, Rehana Khatoon and Sohram Mian @ Soharab Mian @ Sohrai Mian @ Sabram Mian) in the event of arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no. 2534C of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))