IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.102 of 2009 JARINA KHATUN WIFE OF LATE TAIYAB HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARANA, P.S. KUSHESHWARASTHAN, DISTT. DARBHANGA ……PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIATE, PATNA 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA COMMISSIONARY, DARBHANGA 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA COMMISSIONARY, DARBHANGA 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARBHANGA, DIST.- DARBHANGA 6. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BIRAUL, DISTT.- DARBHANGA 7. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE POLICE STATION,KUSHESHWARASTHAN, DISTT. DARBHANGA 8. RAKESH KUMAR, SUB-INSPECTOR CUM INVESTIGATION OFFICER, KUSHESHWARASTHAN, DIST.-DARBHANGA ….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 11.02.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that on the basis of information given by her, Kusheshwarasthan P.S.case No.133 of 2008 was registered on 13.8.2008, but the case is not being properly investigated nor the accused persons are being arrested. Having heard Mr. Manoj Kumr Jha for the petitioner, A.C. to G.A.IX for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner shall be well advised to approach respondent no.5, Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga for the redressal of her grievance. Needless to state that in case petitioner approaches respondent no.5, he will take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion in regard to the claim made by the petitioner and that shall be examined by respondent no.5 in accordance with law. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)