HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA, Ag. CJ. & HON’BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. Writ Petition No. zso ¢f 2002 Pe‘titioner: Sunilv Kumar Shrivastava, S/o. Shri S N L Shnvasmva, aged about 40 years Mllk Collectlon Supewlsor, Vetennary Semces, Jag&alpur Dist Bastar (C G ) Versus 1. sate of Chhamsgarh. Through : Secreiary. Veterinary Services, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Director, Veterinary Services. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Additional Director, Veterinary Services, Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Veterinary Services. Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar (C.G.) 5. State Administrative Tribunal of MP. & Chhattisgarh Bench at Raipur Through Its Registrar RDA Bmldmg, Raipur (C G ) Wnt Petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India Present . Smt Smlta Ghar, counset for the petitioner Shri Yaswant Singh Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 23“ Ju , 2007) The foliowing oral order of the Court was passed by Hon’ble Jagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. This writ petition is directed against the order passed by the State Administrative Tribunal. Raipur rejecting the claim of the petitioner on the ground that alternative remedy of \ ~1‘ available. nforms that an appeal has been etitioner on 24-1 2-2601 and the same is sti Learned codnsei for the petitioner could not indicate any illegality in the order passed by the Tribun of the said order the according to him is still pending. appeal/representation against the impugned order is gLearned counsel for the petitioner i ‘ tiled by the p ll pending. al and in fact in compliance petitioner had already med an appeal which ln such circumstances, interest of justice would ”t” same if an uthorities concerned to decide me appeal same has not already been tiled by the petitioner expeditiously, if the decided. endeavour is made by the a WittLthe abLoeobservation. the writ petition stands disposed of. Ag chle‘ .4 Jus‘ice r as l §amh K n HE gm if Judge ’ Sw‘ 7 ‘ ' Sd/ nimmi