IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION No. 635 of 2009 (MS) Hari Singh ……..Petitioner. Versus Union of India and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Krishi Shukla, Advocate for respondent no. 1, 2 and 3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondent no.4. 1st May, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The short case of the petitioner is that he is running a shop opposite Mansa Devi Rope Way in Haridwar. Although the petitioner has not specifically stated, it appears that land on which the petitioner is running the shop belongs to the Northern Railway and in any case, it is under the control of Northern Railway. This is in fact the statement made at the bar by the learned counsel for the Northern Railway as well as by Sri Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar / respondent no. 4. Moreover, it has been admitted that a premature writ petition has been filed inasmuch as the petitioner has only been given notice by the Senior Section Engineer (Works), Northern Railway, Haridwar / respondent no. 3 on 8th April, 2009, wherein the petitioner has been requested to remove his shop from the land of the northern railway. Therefore, in case, the petitioner has any grievance, he may approach the authority, which had issued the notice to him and the concerned authority will deal with the reply of the petitioner in accordance with law. It is made clear that this court is not giving any comment as on merit of the matter, it is expected that the respondents i.e. Northern Railway and the Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar will act in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 1.5.2009 Rathour