\^^y. ^y^^-"^ 0&/?>-'-"'...-••"" 6ESI'tf ''SesE li a '"> '•J* ~~' •^. ^v-'\^ .? ^ ( -y&^, IN^HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH fS-'" WRIT PETITION f <? 1 N0. 72"72_y2006 PETITIONER Baisakhu RamS/o- Shri Rama Aged about 59 years, R/o- VillageDhangaon Tahsil-Lohara, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1 State ofChhattisgarh Through-the Secretary, Water resources Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Sub-Divisional Officer Kharkhara, Mohdipat Canal Project Sub-Division no.l, Sambalpur District-Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7272 rf2QQ6 Petitioner Baisakhu Raai Versus . Respondents State of Ghhattisgarh & anofher 8B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agaihotri, J Sbxi Aaoop Maj'uindar, Advocate for the petitioaer. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govenunent Advocate for thc respondents. ORDBR (Passed on this 25A day of.Jamiaiy, 2007) 1, By fhis pctition, fhe petitioner, who has worked for morc thaa 15 years as Gangmaa secks a relief that tiie petitioner being permanent gangman be retired at the age of 62 years iu accordance wifh the Chhattisgarh Shaslaya Sevak (Adhlvarshfld-Ayu) Adhimyam, 1967 ( for short fhe Act, 1967') read with Fundamental Riile (for short 'F.R.^ 56. 2. The indisputable facts are that the petitioner was cmployed as gangmHQ. According to kamed couasel for the petitioner, hc attained the status of permaaent employee, as defined imder Rzde 2(c) of fhe Chhattisgarh fWorkcharged and Contiagency Paid Emptoyees) Pensioa Rules, 1979 ( fi)r short the Rules, 1979'), fiamed under Article 309 of the Constitutiou of India. After having attained fhe status of fhe permanent emptoyee the petitioner would rctwe on attauung the age of 62 years on superanniiation under fhe provisioiis offhe Act, 1967. 3. Shri Anoop Majumdar, leamed counsel appearixig for . the petitioner would submit that fhe case of ttie petitioner is r % squarety covered by the decision of this Court passed on 4th Janiiary, 2007 m W.P. No. 108/2005 (Oovind Vs. State of Chhatdsgarh & ofhers) and other connected matters. Smt Anju Ahuja, learued Deputy Govenuneat Advocate, does uot dispute fhe submissions made by leamed counsel for fhe petitioner. Accordiagly, the petitiouer, who is permaaent gaagman, is entitled to retire on attamiag fhe age of 62 years in accordance with the Act, 1967. The petition is accoidingly aUowed. No order as to coste. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur