IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40406 of 2011 1. Balley Pahalwan @ Balley Ray, S/o. late Ram Dhayan Rai, 2. Ranjit Kumar, S/o. Balley Pahalwan @ Balley Ray. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 01.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Birju Prasad stated at bar that final form has been submitted against the petitioners. He has further submitted that petitioner No.1 has been arrested so the application of petitioner No.1 has become infructuous. Since the petitioner No.1 has been arrested, his application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous and accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In view of the facts stated in the F.I.R. relating to offence under Section 302, 307 & 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 537 of 2004 and statement made in the affidavit in support of bail application, in my opinion, it is a fit case in which applicant No.2 should be released on bail. Accordingly, the applicant No.2 Ranjit Kumar shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing sureties to the satisfaction of A.D.J. 1st, Danapur. Mkr. (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.)