IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11788 of 2010(W) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- SUSHITHA SUSEENDRAN, D/O.C.P.SUSEENDRAN, "MANGALYA", VALIYIL PARAMBA, P.O.WEST HILL, CALICUT-5. BY MR.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE. MR.HANSON.P.MATHEW, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT. BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11788 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner completed B.Tech(Information & Technology) course from the A.W.H. Engineering College, Kozhikode. Even though the petitioner completed the course, she has not passed in three subjects each in the 3rd, 4th and 5th semesters and four subjects in the 6th semester. The petitioner has submitted applications for revaluation as per Exhibits P1 to P4. Exhibits P1 to P3 are the applications for revaluation of the three subjects in the 3rd, 4th and 5th semesters and Exhibit P4 is the application for revaluation of four subjects in the 6th semester. 2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to revalue the answer sheets of the petitioner for the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th semesters based on Exhibits P1 to P4 and publish the results forthwith. It is submitted that unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.11788/2010 2 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to complete the process of revaluation. In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation and communicate the results thereof to the petitioner within a period of two months from the late date of receipt of the application. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp