IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1164 of 2006 JAMUN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5. 22.3.2010. Pursuant to the court’s order a counter affidavit has been filed. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, learned counsel representing the Board, with reference to the statement made in the counter affidavit, submits that that he is handing over cheque bearing no.935468 dated 19.3.2010 for Rs.16,008/ being the interest on belated payment of gratuity and cheque bearing No.935469 dated 19.3.2010 for Rs.88,176/ being the arrears of salary claims to the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that the grievances of the petitioner stands redressed. Mr. Shambhu Prasad Barnwal, learned counsel for the petitioner controverting this position, submits that neither any payment towards unutilized leave salary has been made nor any statement has been made in the counter affidavit in this regard. He also submits that the amount of bonus claimed by the petitioner for the period 1995-96 and 1997-98 has also not been paid by the Board. Mr. Barnwal, however, accepts the cheques during the course of the proceeding giving receipt 2 thereof. In view of the developments aforesaid, it is manifest that almost the entire retiral benefits of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondent Board except the dispute regarding unutilized leave salary and bonus. In the afore-mentioned circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his claim in relation to unutilized leave salary and bonus before respondent no.3 the Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Khadi and Village Industries Board and who shall consider and disposed of the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Needless to add that if the amounts are found admissible to the petitioner, the same should be paid within the same period or the claim raised, should be disposed of by a speaking order. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)