IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 692 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRA.398/2005 of SPL.COURT SPE/CBI-II & IV ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM ST.2268/2001 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I, PARAVUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): CRL.REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUS ---------------------------------------------------------------- SAJEEV, S/O.PARAMESWARAN, KALAPPURACKAL HOUSE, KARUMALLOOR KARA, PARUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. 2. T.K.BABU, S/O.KESAVAN, THAIKKUTTATHIL HOUSE, AYYAMPILLY, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN FOR R2 SRI.K.S.RAJESH FOR R2 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.A. IBRAHIM THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-2-2010 , THE COURT ON 24/02/2010 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 692 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 24-2-2010 ORDER The accused in S.T. No. 2268 of 2001 on the file of the J.f.c.M.I, North Paravur for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 2043 of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the superior courts shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani. /true copy/ P.S. to Judge