HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH,BILASPUR w.P.(c1 No.1025‘12oos PETITIONERS 1 Gajanand‘ Prasad Pandey, S/o Shri Dev Dutt Pandey, aged about '71 yeais, R/o Village 8r. Post — Bclsan', P.S‘ 8a Tahsil — Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (QG‘J Lakhan Lai Sahu, S/ o Dashrat‘n Prasad Sahu, R/o Nagoi, RS. — Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 Smt. Alka Shukla, Wfa Shri Rajkumar Shukla, aged about 35 years, Through — Power of attorney Shn' Rajkumar Shukla, S/o Shri Gopi Kishan Shukla, aged about 42 years, R/o Near Santoshi Mandir, Main Road Torwa, RS. — Toma, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) New India Assurance Company Ltd. Through — Divisional Manager, Division Offlcer, in nont of Rajiv Plaza, Bus Stand, Tahsil and District Bilaspur {C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIDN OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Counsel for the petitioners; ORAL ORDER (18.2.2003) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission By way of this Writ Petition iiied under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the validity of that part of the order dated 19(09/2007, by which, their application med under’Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure for impleadment of Punjab National Bank, Branch 2 W.P.(C) No.1025f2008 Bamla, Takhatpur, Distn’ct Bilaspur, as a pmty—rsspondent has bsen dismissed by the Claims Tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the tractor in question was pumhased through a loan sanctioned by the aforesaid Branch of Punjab National Bank and the oiiicers of the Bank says that they had deposited the premium of insurance of the tractor with the New India Assurance Company Ltd., whereas, the Insurance Company has taken a plea that no such premium was received, therefore, in such situation, the said application was med for impleadment of the Bank as a party— xespondent. In fact, this appears to be a dispute between the borrower and iinancer and for that, a tinancer would not be a necessary party to be impleaded in a Claim Petition on account of motor accident caused by the vehicle in question ' In the opinion of this Court, the Claims Tribunal has not committed any irregularity while rejecting the said application. The petition has no merit and the same is dismissed at the iix xi ‘ . sw‘ “Ti” Sum] Kumar sinha (v .r, wan Judge motion stage itself. l