HON'BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO. 1046 OF 2006 Between: M. Aparna & others ..... Appellants AND The Municipal Corporation of Warangal, Rep. by its Commissioner, Warangal & another .....Respondents :: J U D G M E N T:: Counsel for the appellants : Shri J. Prabhakar Counsel for respondent No.1 : Shri C. Narender Counsel for respondent No.2 : Shri V. Durga Nageswar Rao Dated: 23.10.2006 Per G.S.SINGHVI, CJ This appeal is directed against order dated 22.03.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.17949 of 1999 whereby he declined to entertain the appellants’ prayer for quashing communication dated 25.11.1998 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Warangal. After arguing the case for some time, Shri J. Prabhakar, learned counsel for the appellants made a request that his clients may be permitted to withdraw this appeal as also the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate legal remedy against the decision of the Municipal Corporation and also claim other reliefs. Learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Warangal and Kakatiya Urban Development Authority say that they do not have any objection, if the appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal along with the writ petition and they are given opportunity to avail other remedies. In view of the above, this appeal as also Writ Petition No.17949 of 2006 are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellants to avail appropriate legal remedies against the decision of the Municipal Corporation. They shall also be free to seek other reliefs, which may be admissible to them in accordance with law. While disposing of the appeal in the manner indicated above, we make it clear that order impugned in the writ petition shall not operate as a bar to availing of the appropriate legal remedies by the appellants. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23.10.2006 ksld