1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10801 of 2011 CHANDRA SHEKHAR AZAD - Petitioner/s(s) Versus MANOJ KUMAR SINHA & ORS – Respondent/s(s) --------------- 02. 12.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application is filed against the order dated 06.04.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge 2nd, Munger in Title Suit No.99 of 2001 whereby the learned Court below allowed the application filed by the defendant-respondent no.1 for examining expert to compare his disputed signature. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is already a report submitted by an expert after comparing the disputed signature. The learned Court below without setting aside the said report of the expert has allowed the defendant respondent no.1 for comparing by another expert. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that the plaintiff has got compared the signature of the defendant appearing in Exhibit-1 with specimen signature of the defendant by a private expert and, therefore, the defendant applied for comparing by another expert to be appointed by the defendant. The learned Court below also observed that it was submitted before the Court below that now the defendant- respondent wants to obtain a collusive report which was negatived and Court below said that the point shall be decided only after perusal of the report that may be submitted by the expert. 2 In view of the above fact that only the learned Court below has permitted the defendant to get compared his signature by his expert, no injustice has been done to anybody. In view of the above fact, in my opinion, it is not a case where it can be said that any grave injustice has occasioned because of the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)