Crl. Misc.No.M 21311 of 2010 # 1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAT AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 21311 of 2010 Date of Decision:-28.10.2010 Sanjay Kumar & Anr. ......Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana & Anr. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, Advocate for Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Additional Advocate General Haryana. *** JASWANT SINGH, J. Prayer is under section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of FIR No.134 dated 13.4.2010 under Sections 379, 420, 467, 471 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station Sadar, Gurgaon and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit dated 17.7.2010 (P2). In the FIR allegations levelled by the complainant against the petitioners are that petitioner no.1-Sanjay was working as Clerk with the complainant and used to perform all types of work of the complainant including that of money transaction from the bank. Petitioner no.1 used to Crl. Misc.No.M 21311 of 2010 # 2# get transfer the money of the complainant in his bank account. On coming to know about the said fact complainant removed him from the job. After sometime petitioner no.1 again came to the complainant and confessed his guilt and asked him to re-employ him but the complainant refused and on this pretext petitioner no.1 with the help of petitioner no.2 had stolen three cheques bearing no.014971, 014972 and 014793 from the car of the complainant and received a sum of Rs.28,00,000/- by way of these forged cheques and has cheated the complainant. While issuing notice of motion parties were directed to appear before the learned Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of the compromise and submit its report regarding the genuineness of the compromise. Report (Mark-A) in the shape of letter dated 14.10.2010 of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon forwarded by letter dated 15.10.2010 of learned District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon has been received. From the perusal of the above said report it is revealed that the matter between the parties has not been compromised as the complainant has not received his full and settlement amount as agreed between him and the accused. In view of the aforesaid report, I find no ground to invoke jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of the aforesaid FIR. Dismissed. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 28th October, 2010 Vinay