IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 566 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 17.09.2009 A.C. Joshi ... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, AAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No.2. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) Counsel for the petitioner states that in this case, gratuity has been released to the petitioner under the service rules of the respondent Corporation. However, according to him, the petitioner is entitled to the gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. If the gratuity is paid under the said Act, the petitioner is entitled for more amount towards gratuity. In view of the conceded position that the petitioner has the alternative remedy under the aforesaid Act to approach the Controlling Authority, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the authorities CWP No. 566 of 2009 -2- under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. September 17, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE