IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7794 of 2008 RAGHU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.5.2008 Heard. This is a case under Sections 384 & 386 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 406 & 420 of the IPC. As per the allegations the motor cycle of the informant was stolen and the petitioner had visited in his house and demanded Rs. 5,000/- for release of the motor cycle, which was lying with Kalyan Yadav. This petitioner again visited his house along with one unknown person and again demanded money and threatened that if the money is not paid to them he would be killed. Ultimately the money was paid on the promise by the petitioner that the motor cycle would be returned, but the same was never returned to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the role of the petitioner has only to inform the informant regarding the release of the motor cycle and demand of money and he is in custody since 25.10.2007. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner, I do not feel inclined to release the petitioner on bail. His prayer for bail is, therefore, rejected for the present. DKS/ (Rekha Kumari,J)