IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11600 of 2008(E) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24/03/2008 IN IA 3258/07 IN IA 1964/06 IN OS.259/1986 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,KOZHIKODE .................... PETITIONER: RESPONDENT NO.24: ----------------------------------------------------- FAISAL P.K., S/O.LATE M.P.ABOOBACKER, MALAYIL PARAMBIL, THEKKUMTHOTTAM, POONOOR, UNNIKULAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH SRI.C.MURALIKRISHNAN (PAYYANUR) RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS 1 TO 24 & RESPONDENTS 1-23 & 25 TO 34: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PUTHEN PEEDIKAYIL AYAMMAD, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, KEDAVOOR AMSOM, PUTHUR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 2. SISTER PATHAYI, DO. DO. 3. SISTER AYISHA, DO. DO. 4. SISTER KADEEJA, DO. DO. 5. IMBICHI @ MOIDEEN, DO. DO. 6. ABOOBACKER, DO. DO. 7. HUSSAIN, DO. DO. Kss ..2/- ...2.... WPC.NO.11600/2008 E 8. MALIYEKKAL ALI, S/O.LATE AYAMMED, KEDAVOOR AMSOM, PUTHUR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 9. BROTHER YOOSAF, DO. DO. 10. ABDURAHIMAN, DO. DO. 11. SAINUDHEEN, DO. DO. 12. NAFEESA, DO. DO. 13. SAHARA, DO. DO. 14. PATHUMMA, W/O. 16THE PLAINTIFF. 15. MUHAMMED, S/O.IMBICHI MAMMI, KEDAVOOR AMSOM, PUTHUR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 16. MALIK DINAR, DO. DO. 17. SAFIYA, DO. DO. 18. ASSYA, DO. DO. 19. ASSAINAR, DO. DO. 20. SALMAN, DO. DO. 21. ISMAYIL, DO. DO. 22. SHAHAR SAN, DO. DO.~ 23. SHAVAD, DO. DO. 24. PATHUMMAYI, W/O.IMBICHI MAMMI, DO. DO. 25. MOIDEEN, S/O.AMMAD, PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL, KEDAVOOR AMSOM, POONOOR DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 26. MALAYIL PARAMBIL THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL EHAI UMMA, -DO- -DO- Kss ..3/- ...3..... WPC.NO.11600/2008 E 27. MUNDAPURATHU THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL PATHUMMA, DO. DO. 28. VADAKKEPARAMBIL THAMASIKKUM IYATHUMMA DAUGHTER IMPICHI AYISHA, DO. DO. 29. VATTIKKUNNUMMEL THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL CHERIYATHUMMA, DO. DO. 30. KARINCHOLAMALAYIL THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL AHAMMEDKUTTY, DO. DO. 31. PANDIKKAL THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL ABOOBACKER, DO. DO. 32. POZHAMKUNNUMMEL THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL KHADEEJA, DO. DO. 33. KANHIRAPOZHI THAMASIKKUM PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL AMINA, DO. DO. 34. PUTHENPEEDIKAYIL PATHUMMA D/O.AMINA, KOYILANDI TALUK, UNNIKULAM AMSOM, POONOOR DESOM EDAKANDY. 35. AMINAKUTTY DO. DO. 36. KHADEEJA, DO. DO. 37. KUNHA DO. DO. 38. MUHAMMED DO. DO. 39. MARIYAM DO. DO. 40. ABOOBACKER, DO. DO. 41. N.P.MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.KOYASSAN, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KIDAVOOR AMSOM, POONOOR DESOM. 42. MADATHILPARAMBU KUNHAYISHA, DO. DO. Kss ...4/- ..4.... WPC.NO.11600/2008 E 43. CHAKKITTAKANDI IMPICHI PATHUMMA, W/O.KALANDAN, P.O.KUTTAMBOOR, NARIKKUNI. 44. MALAYILPARAMBIL AMINA, W/O.LATE ABOOBACKER, MALAYIL PARAMBIL, THEKKUMTHOTTAM, POONOOR, UNNIKULAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. 45. LAILA, DO. DO. 46. SAFIA, DO. DO. 47. SATHAR, DO. DO. 48. MUNDAPPURATHU AHAMMED KUTTY, KOLIKKAL, UNNIKULAM P.O. 49. ABOOBACKER, DO. DO. 50. SULAIMAN, DO. DO. 51. AYISHA, KOLIKKAL, DO. DO. 52. VATTIKUNNUMMEL THAMASIKKUM MOIDEEN, S/O. LATE ABDULLA, VADAKKEPARAMBIL, KOLIKKAL, UNNIKULAM P.O. 53. ABU, DO. DO. 54. RAZACK, DO. DO. 55. ITHATHU, DO. DO. 56. ABDURAHIMAN, DO. DO. 57. AKBAR, S/O.IMPICHI MAMMI, THATTANCHERI, KOLIKKAL, UNNIKULAM P.O. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 11600 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred against the order of the II Addl. Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode, in IA 3258/07 in IA 1964/06 in OS 259/86. 2. The said application is one for auctioning the right to take the usufructs from the decree schedule property and deposit the sale proceeds in the court. According to them, as per the decree the defendants are liable to provide share of mesne profits since 1986. 22 years have lapsed and a finality has not been attained to the litigation till now. Since the preliminary decree provides for mesne profits from the defendants, one cannot find fault with the application of this nature and the court blow has considered it in a proper perspective and has only directed to sell the right to take usufructs from the property in auction among sharers. 3. It is the only possible and feasible method which will protect the right of the parties and therefore, I do not want to interfere with the order rendered by the learned Subordinate Judge. At the same WPC NO 11600/08 2 time, since the matter is of the year 1986, it is desirable that the proceedings are expedited and if there is any stay from the High Court, that fact may be brought to the notice of the High Court. I also make it clear that let the amount be deposited in a Nationalised Bank from the court so that ultimately the parties will be able to get the interest portion also according to their entitlement. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps WPC NO 11600/08 3 WPC NO 11600/08 4