IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20274 of 2010 Kumari Sunita Paswan, wife of Dilip Kumar Paswan, resident of village Vishnupur, Baitha, P.S. Pusa, District- Samastipur …………. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.The Director, ICDS, Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Collector, Samastipur 4.The District Welfare Officer, Samastipur 5.The Child Development Project Officer, Pusa, District- Samastipur ……………. Respondents ----------- 3. 25/03/2011 Petitioner has challenged the order of the Collector dated 26.8.2010, as contained in Annexure-17, by which her engagement as Anganbari Sevika has been cancelled on the ground that she belongs to Scheduled Caste category whereas majority of beneficiaries of Centre No.43 belong to backward category. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the initial mapping of the beneficiary area of the Centre, majority of Scheduled Caste category was found, which fact can be ascertained from the documents, and if necessary, by re-mapping of the beneficiary area again. Against the order of the Collector, petitioner has remedy of appeal before the Commissioner. 2 In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before the Divisional Commissioner against the order of the Collector. If such an appeal is filed, the Divisional Commissioner shall consider the same on merits, without going into the question of limitation, shall call for the records, shall hear the parties, and if necessary, shall get further verification made in respect of the population of the beneficiary area and thereafter shall decide the same in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of appeal by the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)