1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1346 OF 2004 IN ARBITRATION SUIT NO.2266 OF 1986 Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal. ... Plaintiff. vs. 1.Yogindra Navinchandra Mafatlal & others. .... Defendants. And 1. Mrs.Pravin Rasesh Mafatlal & others. ...Respondents --- Mr.F.Dubhash i/b. Vigil Juris, for Plaintiff. Mr. F. Sayed i/b. M.K.Ambalal & Co., for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 7th December, 2005 P.C.:- 1. This is a chamber summons taken out by the plaintiff for bringing legal representatives of deceased defendant no.2 on record. According to the learned Counsel appearing for plaintiff, the proposed 2 Legal representatives of the deceased defendant no.2 have been served. None appears for them. They have not filed any reply opposing the chamber summons. In the absence of any reply, accepting the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the chamber summons at face value, the chamber summons is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. ---