IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. 23272 M of 2009 Date of decision:- 3.2. 2010 Haroon petitioner vs State of Haryana and another Respondent Present: Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate. Mr. SS Goripuria, DAG, Hry Mr. Neeraj Gaur, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner apprehends arrest pursuant to the summoning order issued by Magistrate in complaint u/s 323/506 IPC. Learned counsel for the complainant has put in appearance to oppose the petition contending that the complaint is u/s 376 (2) (g) IPC and that on investigation the FIR was cancelled by the police with the connivance of the petitioner. Since the dual version regarding offence u/s 376 (2)(g) IPC has already cropped up and the petitioner apprehends arrest in a private complaint; the liberty of the petitioner has not prejudiced the appearance of the complainant as a witness; the probability of tampering with the evidence is remote, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner will put in appearance before the summoning court by 27.2.2010. In case of petitioner doing so, he will be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds for a sum of Rs.30,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the said court subject to the condition that the petitioner will not make an attempt to tamper with the evidence and will not absent himself without any sufficient cause. February 3 ,2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE