IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF NOTICE OF NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2142 OF 2003 MOTION NO. 2142 OF 2003 MOTION NO. 2142 OF 2003 IN IN IN INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 681 OF 2003 APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 681 OF 2003 APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 681 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income-tax, City-VII, Mumbai. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Namrata Exports P.Ltd. ... Respondent. Mr A. D. Kango for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 23rd April 2007. DATED : 23rd April 2007. DATED : 23rd April 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Perused affidavit as well as additional affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion seeking condonation of 108 days delay. Sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)