1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.4 of 2007 Abdul Kaleem Ab.Kadar and ors. .vs.. Noorjahan Begum Syed.Rashid and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.Anjan De,Adv.for the appellants. Mr.S.C.Bhalerao, Adv. for resp.no.1. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J. DATED : 4th January, 2010. 1. This appeal arises from interim order dated 19/8/2006 by which the appellants have been restrained from disposing of the suit property to any person pending the hearing of the suit. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the order cannot be sustained since the same is passed despite the fact that the appellants have disposed of the property to 70 persons, who are not made parties to the suit. Para no.9 of the impugned order indicates that the property sold is not the entire suit property and something is left in the hands of the appellants. At least, in respect of the portion left the order cannot be said to be unjustified. 2 2. Mr.S.C.Bhalerao, learned counsel for the respondents, makes a statement that the trial in the suit has already commenced and the recording of evidence has started. In that circumstance, the learned counsel for the appellants requests that the trial court be directed to dispose of the suit as early as possible. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of with direction to the trial court to make every endeavour to dispose of the suit as early as possible. JUDGE. chute