IN THE HIGH COURT OF J^INCATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITIONNO. B 13 /2006 PETITIONER ^V-l"^ ^M\^- /<,J^.-t" ^v'" ^" \^--' '"^y" -•< Rin@ia f. ^li^ Vrindavan Pradhan, S/o. Tosh Ram Pradhan, Aged about 46 years, Gramin Dak Sevak (Delivery Agent), Rural Postal Service, Village & P.0. Kotarliya, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS .«*•" RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India, Ministry of Information SE f Broadcasting, Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, NewDelhi- 110001 Through its Member (Personnel) 2. The Chief Post Master General, Chhattisgarh Circle, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Supdt. of Post Offices, Raigarh Division, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Supdt. of Post Offices, Chhindwara Division, Chhindwara (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI, PROHIBinON AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT ORWRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ^rs 1 \ Bablu HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. 813 of 2006 Petitioner ; Vrindavan Pradhan Versus Resoondents : Union of India others Singie Bench: Hbn'ble Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Akhiiesh^&alpati, Advocate for the Petitioner. .AAr. V.S. Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bhisma Kinger, 5tonding counsei of the Union of India/respondents. ORE5ES (Passed on 19th Day of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel cppearing for the petitioner at the threshoid submits that the petitioner does not want to press any otiier prayer, except prayer No. 7.3 for ssek'mg a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner with regard to the change of his place of posting within Chhattisaarh Circle on •rtie promotion post of Postman instead of Chhindwara Division. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to grcint of the same prexyer. 3. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the representation dated 5.3.2005 (Annexure P/ll) pending before the Member yersonnel), Post and Telecom Board, New Delhi within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the concerned authorities forthwith. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _- Satish K. Agmhotn Judge