WP(C) 4765/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The case of the petitioners is that they are selected candidates for get ting the licence of S.K. Oil agency. However, they have not been issued with the licences and so they are not in a position to carry out the agency. Mr. S.M. Ab dullah P. learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the orders of this Court in various other writ petitions. He submits that the case of the petition ers needs to be considered by the Deputy Commissioner, Goalpara. Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate submits that the se lection having been conducted way back in 2000, its validity has long expired. M oreover, the petitioners cannot claim S.K. Oil licence as a matter of right. Considering the matter in its entirety and as agreed to by the learned c ounsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of providing that the Depu ty Commissioner, Goalpara may take on record the grievance of the petitioners an d dispose of the same in accordance with law facilitating which the petitioners may make a representation to the Deputy Commissioner who in turn shall dispose o f the same in terms of this order. No opinion is expressed regarding the merit o f the case of the petitioners and the same is left to be decided by the Deputy C ommissioner, Goalpara strictly in accordance with law.