1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7044 OF 2010 Balasaheb s/o Sopanrao Jadhav and anr. ..Petitioners Versus The State Election Commission, through Commissioner and ors. ..Respondents Mr.C.V.Thombre, Advocate for petitioners Mr.S.T.Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.S.K.Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent-State CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 5th August 2010 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioners challenge the formation of the wards and the reservation provided in the said wards. Mr.Shelke, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 points out that the election programme has already been declared and the polling is scheduled to be held on 8th of this month, i.e. after about three days from today. 2. In that light of the matter, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere in this petition and this petition is, therefore, dismissed with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/7044.10wp)