IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2201 of 2007 Date of Decision:- 27.02.2008 Sharanjit Kaur ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate vs. Smt.Bhan Kaur and others ....Respondent(s) through Mr.M.S.Sidhu, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 21.3.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby an application under Order 1 rule 10 read with Order 6 rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, moved by respondent No.1 for impleadment as plaintiff has been allowed and the amended plaint in which respondent No.1 is one of the plaintiffs in her individual capacity, has been taken on record. The facts may be noticed briefly. Parminder Singh, Narlep Kaur and Bhagwant Singh are minor children of deceased Randhir Singh. They have filed the present suit through their grand-mother against their own mother, i.e. the present petitioner, seeking declaration that they are the exclusive owners in possession of the estate left behind by their deceased father. They have also sought decree for permanent injunction to restrain their petitioner-mother C.R. No.2201 of 2007 -2- from alienating the suit property. In the accompanying revision petition, namely, Civil Revision No.3206 of 2007, which has been allowed vide a separate order of even date, it has already been prima-facie held that there is conflict of interest between the minor children and their petitioner-mother. She has concededly executed an agreement in favour of a third party surrendering the lease rights (for a period of 99 years) of her deceased- husband for a paltry consideration. It is for this precise reason that the minor children have filed the present suit against their mother, through their grand-mother. Respondent No.1, namely, the grand-mother of the minor children, has now moved the application for her impleadment as plaintiff in her individual capacity also as she being the mother of deceased Randhir Singh, is also one of his legal heirs. Her application has since been allowed by the learned trial Court vide the impugned order. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and in the light of the above noticed facts when there appears to be no conflict of interest between the minor children and respondent No.1 i.e. their grand-mother, no legal error has been committed by the learned trial Court by impleading respondent No.1 as a plaintiff. Dismissed. February 27, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE