1 cr.apl.no.4068/2006 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4068 OF 2006 (Jagu s/o Balasaheb Deshmukh vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.B.S.Kudale, Advocate for the applicant, absent. Mrs.S.D.Shelke, APP for respondent State. Ms.Maya R.Jamdhade, Adv., for respondent no.3, absent. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:13/10/2011 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Perused the petition. Heard learned A.P.P. 3. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged registration of the FIR (Crime No. 96/2006), registered at Sengaon Police Station under Sections 393 and 506 of IPC as well as under Section 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and under Section 7(1)(5) of Protection of Civil Rights Act. 4. According to the complainant, he was abused after his caste and was assaulted. Petitioner has challenged factual aspect of the matter. 2 cr.apl.no.4068/2006 5. The factual aspect cannot be adjudicated at the stage of quashing. Whether abuses were given and assault was caused to the complainant has to be investigated and, in the event of the investigation leading to filing of charge-sheet, the truth has to emerge only upon conclusion of the trial. 5. In this view of the matter, we are satisfied that the pendency of the petition does not advance the cause of justice, it rather repels it. 6. We, therefore, dismiss the petition and vacate the interim relief. We, however, grant to the petitioner four weeks' time to appear before the Court and apply for bail. 7. With above direction, petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE ... agp/4068-06crapl