W , / “Op IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) NO. g0! 6 / 2011 Shiv Kumar‘ Khufe S/o Lafe Shri PeTi‘rioner' g§ <2 \Wiymg $g‘wv qgwm. ...... f::hU::r:::r:c::::W Jhadu Ram Khufe, Aged about 41 Mldd|e School Bumdwur Bash Block ‘ Versus Sakfi, Dis‘rt Janjgir Champa-(CCI) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION ' OF INDIA RespondenTs : /’ 1. STa’re of Chhaffisgarhihrough - The Secretary Educafion Depar‘rmen’r, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, DisT’r. Raipur: (C.€v.) Disé‘ricf Educa‘rion Officer, Dish‘. Janjgir‘ Champa—(C.G.) ,3. Joim‘ Direc’ror, / Accoum‘ and Treasury, Dish‘. Bilaspur— (6.6.) 4. Block EducaTion Officer, B!ock EZGB Mm CGUR’I‘ OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR s3 : aownm MR. JusTICE pRxTmKER DIWAKER W.P.gs).N_o_. sciaizou Shn‘ Anil Singh Rajpug counsal for the petitionar. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. AG. for the State. WRITm PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTKTUTIGN OF INDIA ORDER (30.08.201 1) Counsal for the pétitiona“ submits that thc petitioner is Entitled to benefit of two advance incremsnts on acccunt 0f he: having passed 8.71}. examination in the year 199i bafore his appointmém af hi$ own cost. it is submitteki that The issue. involveéi in the prétseil‘i ,stition is no longcr res integra, and the sanm has battn finaliy ‘ decided by the Hon’ble Suprsms Court in {he oasc of Asha Saxena Vs. State of MJ’. & Ors. 2009 {HQMPJR (SC) 59 as well as by this CO art in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corpota‘tion, Durg 8r. Anothtir 8r, Gopssh Kumax Verma v. The State of Chhattisgarh :3: Another. it is fuxther submitted that the instant pstition is squarely covsmd by the decision as afomstated. Thus The petitioner may bs psrmitted to make rsyressntation for deciding his (as: in the light of the aforesaid dscision, subject to verimcation of the facts as to Whether the petitionm‘ has acquired 3.111. ce-rtiiicats on his own axpensss before anterixlg inm séwice. Counsel for ths patitionsr submits that now the $tati: Govt. has also issued ail ordar on 5. 1.201 1 (Annexme p/4;. ' Counsel for tho Stats submits that in the svenr of making any representation by ths petitionsr, the same wouid be. considere(§ and PETI’NONER Shiv K Lunar Khum versus RESFOND§NTS Slam af QG. <35 ¢> decided , in accovdance With law ami in tha light of the dacixions 01" the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena, (supra) as Well as this Count in Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj (31mm; and Goycsh Kumar Vcrma (supra) Within a period of three months from the date of receipt of tho ropresan faiton . In View of above, tho petition is disposed of‘as Homing survives 1'11 the some for adjudicarion. ’ Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge