1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.688 OF 2009 Dr. Umakant Narayanrao Shelke ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ----- Shri S.B. Rohile, Advocate for the petitioner Shri S.D. Kaldate, A.P.P. for the respondent. ----- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 15th October, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has prayed for directing the police to investigate the offence and register the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even the allegations are there that the police officers have manufactured some documents and have not registered the offence. 3. The learned A.P.P. has taken instructions and based on same, submits that a civil dispute was pending between the 2 parties. The civil suit was pending between the parties and according to learned counsel for the petitioner, the suit has been decreed in favour of the petitioner. In view of the facts of the case, the learned A.P.P. submits that, the police have decided that no case is made out to register the offence. 4. In the light of the judgment reported in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. (2008) 2 SCC 409, the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy to approach the Magistrate. We do not find that even at this stage the case is required to be handed over to any other agency. 5. We find that, in exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction, no interference at this stage is called for. The petitioner may avail alternate remedy. The petition is dismissed. [ SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] fmp/cwp688.09