IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1059 of 2011 SINOD SINGH @ TINKU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased. According to prosecution case itself, the marriage of the deceased had taken place five years ago but subsequently, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment on account of illegal demand. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that during course of the investigation, independent witnesses have specifically stated that deceased committed suicide as there was some quarrel between her as well as the petitioner on a very petty issue. In support of his contention, he referred Paragraph Nos. 13, 14 and 15 of the case diary. Admittedly, the deceased died in other than natural circumstances but in course of investigation, some witnesses have stated that she committed suicide. It would appear from perusal of the first information report itself, that she spent her life near about five years in her matrimonial home. So, the question of illegal demand after such a long time appears to be doubtful. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Dehri (Indrapuri) P.S. Case No. 238 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )