IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.764 OF 2005 Bhausaheb Maruti Shermale ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Uday Warunjikar for Petitioner. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. None for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 13, 2005. APRIL 13, 2005. APRIL 13, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. I see no reason to depart from the approach adopted by the lower Court for rejecting Application for delay in filing Revision Application preferred by the Applicant, as can be discerned from Para 3 of the order. : 2 : 3. The reason as recorded cannot be found fault with and if it is so, the conclusion reached by the lower Court was inevitable. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.