Crl. Rev. No.3396 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.3396 of 2010 Date of Decision: 01.04.2011 Bhupinder Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Raman Mohinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a revision against the Order dated 25.11.2010 passed by Special Judge, Ferozepur. The petitioner has filed an application for directing the SHO/Investigating Officer, Police Station, Ghall Khurd to produce the original papers alleged to be prepared at the spot i.e. Ruqa, site plan and memo of personal search of Ramandeep Kaur, accused alleged to be signed by Illaqa Magistrate on 13.07.2010. The said application was disposed of vide order dated 25.11.2010 passed by Special Judge, Ferozepur, wherein a finding is recorded that all the copies of the documents attached with the challan have been handed over to the accused and the accused/petitioner duly signed the same after receipt. It is further noticed in the order that there Crl. Rev. No.3396 of 2010 2 was no such order of Duty Magistrate available on the file which may show that the Duty Magistrate had signed any site plan, personal search memo or ruqa. Moreover, it is admitted that the challan has already been filed. Charges have also been framed. Documents as available with the final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C have been handed over to the petitioner. No order to give a document which is neither available nor exists can be passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out any fault with the order dated 25.11.2010 passed by the Special Judge, Ferozepur. No other argument was raised. No ground. Dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 01.04.2011 JUDGE gurpreet