HIGH COURT OF CIEATTISGARJ’I AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2823 of 2007 T’ETITIONER Smt, Lily Sahu, W/o Laxmag Ram Sahu, Agad about 38 years, Occupation Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Toma, Block — Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur [C.G.] VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District —Raipur [0G,] 2. The Director, Public Instruction, D.K.S. Bhawaa Raipur, District — Raipur [C.G,] j 3. The Joint Director, Pubiic Instruction Raipur 7 " Division? Raipur [C,G,] 4. The District Education OmGer, District — Raipur {QGJ RESPONDENTS 5. Block Education Ohicer, Abhanpur, District — Raipur [C.G.} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 22’? OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Mr. Shivcndu Pandya, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 8m day of May, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein is asto Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of initial appointment or h‘om the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the Statelrespondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) \ No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowedrvide order dated 7. l 1.2006. 3. In View ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. L Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge , Ami! @