IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15428 of 2008 Between: 1 B. Upender, S/o. Ramaiah, R/o. No. 13-46, Main Road, Thorrur, Warangal District 2 V. Jaggaiah, S/o. Narasaiah, R/o. Kankara Board Street, Mahabubanda, Warangal District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Dept., of Civil Supplies, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Civil Supplies Bhavan, Errum Manzil Colony, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Rep by its Managing Director 3 The Joint Collector & Ex. Officio Executive Director, AP State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Warangal, Warangal District. 4 The District Manager, AP State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Warangal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, oder or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Tender Notice in No. Movt. 5(1)/State-II/2008-09, dt. 11- 7-2008 issued by the 3rd respondent so far as imposing a condition that the tenderer should have vehicles with a capacity of 25 M.Ts Owned and 10 MTs Leased) for Thorrur MLS Point and 55 M.Ts. (35 MTs Owned and 20 MTs Leased) for Mahaboobabad MLS Point and disqualifying the tenderers who do not have such capacity of vehicles as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory, whimsical, capricious, irrational and unreasonable apart from violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the constitution of India and suffers from non-application of mind and also amounting to unreasonable restriction and consequentially set aside the said condition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.R.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter into the Registry on 13.8.2008, seeking to withdraw the Writ Petition. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order granted by this Court on 18.7.2008 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J DATE: 14.08.2008 CVM