IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4444 of 2009 Between: G.Gangadhar ..... PETITIONER AND V.Palani .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4444 of 2009 ORDER: Heard both the counsel. The petitioner is the defendant. Respondent/plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.1/2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Punganur for recovery of money based on a promissory note. The petitioner/defendant filed I.A.233/2009 under Sec.45 of the Indian Evidence Act to send Ex.A2 Promissory Note to the Expert of Forensic Laboratory to detect the age of the ink of two signatures of the defendant, age of the ink of the signatures of the scribe, attestor and the running matter. The said application has been dismissed by the Court below, against which this civil revision petition is filed. It is stated that there is no dispute with regard to the signatures of the defendant on the said promissory note. If that be so, the only course that is open for the defendant is to put forth his defence by adducing cogent evidence or cross examining the witnesses of the plaintiff. I am of the opinion that the Expert cannot give exact date of signing of promissory notes. The Court below considered the said contentions and rightly dismissed the application of the petitioner/defendant. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the said order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 06.11.2009 Dsr