1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT Nand Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.2062/2009) S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Date of Order :- 30.09.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.CHAUHAN Mr.Ankur Rastogi, for the petitioners. Ms.Alka Bhatnagar, Public Prosecutor. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the FIR, FIR No.221/2009, dated 01.08.2009, registered at Police Station Dadabari, Kota City for offences under Section 447, 420, 467, 471 and 120-B IPC. According to Mr. Ankur Rastogi, the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners have nothing to do with the plot in question. Therefore, they are needlessly being roped in by the complainant in the present case. He has submitted certain documents which buttress his case. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is, indeed, a settled principle of law that the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing a FIR is extremely limited. At the initial stage, when the investigation is in progress, this Court is not empowered to look into any 2 documents which may be used by an accused for his defence. Whether the accused is involved or not, whether he is in legal or illegal occupation of the plot in question, are issues to be investigated by the police. Therefore, this Court is not in a position to speak on these issues at this moment. A bare perusal of the FIR reveals a prima facie case against the accused- petitioners, of course subject to the finding of the police in the investigation. Therefore, no reason has been made out by the learned counsel before this Court for interfering with the said FIR. In this view of the matter, the Criminal Misc. Petition is devoid of any merit. It is, hereby, dismissed. (R.S.CHAUHAN)J. Manoj Solanki-