IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2011 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13616 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.GIRIJA, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, ERATHU VADAKKADATHUKAVU.P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ SMT.P.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645. BY G.P.SMT.SUDHADEVI.N. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.13616 of 2011 ---------------------------- Dated 17th May, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed on being aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of transfer. In fact, raising grievances against Ext.P1 the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation. It is still pending before the second respondent. The petitioner sought for an expedite disposal of Ext.P2 representation. In the said circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In case an order in favour of the petitioner would affect any other transferees under Ext.P1, they should also be heard prior to the passing of orders on Ext.P2. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS // true copy // P.S. to Judge