IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHA'ITISGAK'I) WRIT -mT1TIéN Mm gmy) OF 2.002;; PETITIO NERS Umesh Kumar Sahu, son of Shri Bhagirathi Sahu, aged abcut 35 years; resident of Da&ar Niwas,Model Town Nehru NagaryBhilai,‘ District Durg, (C.G,) Rakesh Kurhar Vermsr, sonof Shri ‘ Khemlal Verma, resident of Village KhaaiE,’ Past—Samewara'.‘ 1: Tehsil-Chhwikhaaan, r ‘ i District Rajnanagaon. (c.G.) ‘ 3. Rajendra Kumar Sahu,sonof Shri Lachhu Ram Sahu; resident of Dani Tola Wara,“ Dhamtariw District Dhamtari, (C‘;G.) w Surya Kant vex-ma, s'on of Shri Khemraj Vermamgaa ahmesident of Village Kamthawost-Manala: District Rajnand gamii (C .G.‘) Yogesh Kumazj‘ Sahu, son of Shri Chhoteial Sahu,‘ :esiaent ef- near over bridgemhalmard NoilOii § Station Para,Raj nandgaon (C.G.) 6.‘ Jitendra‘Kuimarv Kaushik‘g‘son of shri K.¥’.Kaushik,resiaent of Village and Post-Lailunea District—Raigarh, (C.G.) Smt. Yogmaya Sahu, wife of Shri Rajenara Kumar Sahu,‘ resident of Da‘ni Tola Waré, Dhamtari. D istrict Dhamtari,_(c.G.) Sanjay Shrivastava, son‘of Shri S .L.Shrivastava, reswent of village Kaohhe ,Tehsil 4Bhanupratappur‘ _ Dstrict-Karma, (0.6.) " "‘20In 1.‘ i 2 s 9. Smtzg Triveni Sahumife o£ shri AnilKumar Sahu‘,‘ residet of Gokulpur, Rudri Roadinhamtari. (c.G.) g Prahlad Fate1,sen ei Shri Makundi Patel, resident of village and wst Nanéni Khundni-izmhamdha) District Durg,’(C.G.') YE RES POWE N’I‘S The State of Chhattisgarh.through its Secretary,Department af Health and Family Weifare, Mantralay,D.K.S.Building‘, Raipur'xcoGo) The State of Madhya Pradesh‘; through its Secretary,Department =_; of Health ané Family Welfare“, « Mantralay, Vallabh Bhawanahopal, (M.P.) 2- : The M.P.Boar:d of Ayurvedic and Unani Systemof Medicine ana Naturopathy.Bhopa1. (M.P.) through L} its Registrar,$hyamla Hillas, Bhopal. (M.P.) Chhattiégarh Board of Ayurvedic aw Unani system o£ Medicine and Naturopathy ,‘Raipur , through the Registrar.Raipur, (c .G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 223/227 OF THE‘CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1‘. Particulam of the Petitioners As per cause title. 2. Particulars of the Respondents g As per cause title: .l03ont’ @ HW,W6,W mm w£aaé>§11xaL XI-HC—22 WW 23-3-2005 ‘ ‘ ' ' Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiw ari, Advocate the petitioners. Slui Vivck Shauna, Panel Lawvcr for State. Shn’ Sanjay Ku. Agraw a1, Adv. for respondent no. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that order has been passed by this Court in similar writ petition. State Counsel is not il >_ a, position to dispute this fact. In View of the onler da ted 24-4-2001 passed in WP. No. 558 of 2001 (Zahjrull Khan and another —v- State of Chhatfisgarh and others), all the aspects contained in the pmsent petition can be examined by the Competent Authority at. the time of consideration. In the result, this petition is disposed of wiLh Lhe direclion that [he petitioner be given requisite form for enrolmert and the same be examined on Authority keeping in View the High Court in WP. No. i287 of The petitioner should enclose a fonn while submitting the [onus for enrolment. i Ceruiied copy as per miles: i merit by the Competent judgment rendered by M‘P 1990 decided on 6-5-1997 copy of that order with the (i« ( Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge QM“ (@W) e a