IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT KAPIL KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF JA. AND ORS. S.B.Cr. Revision Petition No.69 Of 2009 under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated August 29, 2008 Judge, Family Court No.1 Jaipur whereby the compromise made by the petitioner and the respondnet No.3 was attested and Rs.3,000 per month was allowed as maintenance and costy of litigation in the amount of Rs. 1,000 was also granted. In Lok Adalat. Date of Order : February 25 , 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Shashi Shekhar Gaur, for the petitioner Smt. Rekha Madnani, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Rajesh Jain for the respondent. BY THE COURT : This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated August 29, 2008 of the Judge, Family Court No.1 Jaipur whereby the compromise petition submitted between the petitioner and the respondnet No.3 was attested and Rs.3,000 per month was allowed as maintenance and cost of litigation Rs. 1,000 was also granted. 2. On reading the petition filed by the petitioner and the orders passed by the Judge Family Court, it appears that the parties i.e. Petitioner and the respondent, who are husband and wife compromised the matter and their compromise was attested by the Judge Family Court Jaipur on August 29, 2008. On the basis of the compromise the application filed by the respondent was also decided on August 29, 2008 and she was allowed maintenance in the amount of Rs. 3,000 per month as per the compromise and further Rs. 1,000/- as cost of litigation. The application of the parties under section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 was submitted to the Lok Adalat constituted as per the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act. Sub section (2) of Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, provides that every award made by a Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute, and no appeal shall lie to any court against the award. The order/award passed by the Judge Family Court which constituted Lok Adalat on August 29,2008 is final and binding on all the parties to the dispute and no appeal shall lie to any court against the award. Thus the order of the Judge Family court passed as per the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act as mentioned above is a final order and the same is not appealable and thus become final. The revision petition filed against the said order is not maintainable. The revision petition being devoid of merit is liable to be rejected. 3. In the result the revision petition is rejected. Since the main petition has been dismissed, the stay application also stands rejected. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J OPPareek/