CW 7349/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7349/08 Smt. Choti Devi Khara Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 01/08/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. V.D. Gathala, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed by petitioner with the grievance that one of the respondents added as No.6 she submitted application in pursuance of advertisement Ann.1 dt.28th January, 2008 after expiry of last date of submission of application form which was 15th February, 2008. As such, she could not have been considered for participation in the process of selection in pursuance of advertisement [supra]. There is no material on record which could substantiate submission made by counsel that application submitted bythe respondent No.6 was much after the expiry of last date notified in the advertisement [supra]. Apart from it, her representation which has been annexed as Ann.4, it appears that she sought clarification of being resident of Goodliya and as per norms local resident is given preference and according to representation Ann.4, her percentage is 53.54. No adverse inference can be drawn from her representation that she has submitted application in pursuance of advertisement after expiry of CW 7349/08 [2] last date notified by the respondents. Suffice it to say that as per her representation she appears to be meritorious in comparison to petitioner whose name finds place in the select list which has been placed on record as Ann.5. Consequently, this court finds no substance in the writ petition, the same stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA7349CW2008 1-8.doc