IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2170 of 2008 SUSHILA KUER & ANR Versus BINDESHWARI PRASAD & ORS ----------- 2 16/1/2009 Heard Mr. V.Nath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. The issue with regard to death of Vijoy Prasad which was sought to be made subject matter of execution case levied in the year 1996 had to be gone into only on the basis of some evidence. The petitioners coming to the shoes of the judgment-debtor has tried to obstruct the execution case by taking plea that Vijoy Prasad had died before passing of the decree and for this purpose after the decree was passed a death certificate dated 6.12.1996 was sought to be filed on 18.7.2008. Such death certificate by the court below has been found to be a suspicious document and therefore not admitted in evidence. The court below cannot be said to have committed any error because the document in question has been also placed before this Court and the same does not appear to be genuine as it is not in the 2 prescribed printed form. Accordingly, this application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed with a direction to the court below to ensure that the execution case of the year 1996 is definitely disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is, however, made clear that dismissal of this Civil Revision Application will not prejudice the petitioner in any manner in completing the remaining part of the execution proceeding pending in the court below. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar