FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8056 OF 2006 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.P.S.Dani for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Borkar for respondent no.2. Mr.K.S.Patil for respondent no.1. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 3RD MARCH, 2008 DATED: 3RD MARCH, 2008 DATED: 3RD MARCH, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition is directed against the orders of the courts below by which the application at Exhibit-20 filed by respondent no.2 for adding him as party to the dispute bearing Co-operative Case No.201 of 2000 has been allowed. I perused the dispute so also the orders impugned in the present writ petition. It appears that looking to the nature of rival claims of the parties, namely, the petitioner and respondent no.2 the courts below have held that respondent no.2 would be necessary and proper party in the dispute. Considering the concurrent findings of the courts below so also the provisions contain in section 94(3)(a) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and considering that the order impugned is interlocutory in nature, in my opinion, it does not warrant interference by this court under Article 227 of the Constitution. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)