IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8496 of 2009 Sanyukta Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----- 3. 09.08.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 26.8.2008 and 31.12.2008 passed by the District Magistrate and in appeal by the Commissioner, Munger, declining to consider her for appointment on the post of Anganwari Sevika. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the claims arise out of appointment under the Jamalpur Scheme after bifurcation of Bariarpur Block and Haweli Kharagpur Block. The impugned orders proceed on the premise of restructuring of vacancy in pursuance of the bifurcation of the Blocks. He relies upon an order of the Commissioner himself in Misc. Appeal No. 2 of 2011 in which he has given direction to consider for appointment. The objection of the State that any consideration and appointment has to be subject to actual availability of vacancy consequent to the reorganization of the Blocks, is a matter to be more appropriately considered by the Commissioner in light of his own order dated 11.4.2011 in Misc. Appeal No. 2 of 21011. Let the petitioner represent before the Commissioner, Munger, in light of the aforesaid discussion along with necessary materials to enable the Commissioner to pass fresh appropriate orders after hearing all concerned within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)