:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2764 OF 2003 PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2764 OF 2003 PIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2764 OF 2003 WITH WITH WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 605 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 605 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 605 OF 2004 Kewal R. Semlani ..Petitioner versus Shree Siddihi Vinayak Ganpati Temple Trust Management Committee & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Ramesh Soni with Mr. Shakti Singh Champawat i/b. M/s. Khaitan & Jayakar for the Petitioner. Mr. S. G. Surana for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 13. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr. K. R. Belosey, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 14 to 16. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 5TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This writ petition was filed in public interest for the reliefs mentioned in paragraph 29 of the petition. The main relief claimed was that the Government should frame and publish a criteria for proper and transparent assessment of the applications for, and the quantum of financial aid and the manner of its disbursement to genuine and :2: needy institutions. Various orders were passed by this court. A Committee headed by Justice V. P. Tipnis was also appointed, which gave its report. The Advocate General informs that the Guide-lines have been framed and they have already been published and notified and have come into force. Therefore, the said main relief is granted. We do not think that it will serve any purpose to keep the matter on board. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to the Report of Justice Tipnis. According to him, this Report pointed out certain irregularities in disbursement and recommended appropriate action. The Government would look into this aspect of the matter and if they feel that there is any need to have enquiry in the matter to fix responsibility, they may do so in accordance with the law. 3. Learned Advocate General stated that arrangements were made by this court for disbursement of amounts on account of medical relief. Those arrangement shall also come to an end and the amounts shall now be disbursed in accordance with the newly framed Guide-lines. :3: 4. Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 5. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, notice of motion does not survive, and the same also stands disposed of. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)