i‘N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHI-iATTiSGARH AT BILASPU’R WRISJNO. 65%“) 12009 PETITI‘ONER: / Muriidhar Choudhary Sju Late Bhagirathi’ Choudhary Aged about 60 years, Head Master Primarv School, Bansia, Block Raigarh, District Raigarh (0G3 VERSUS RESWNDENTS /1. State of Chhattisgarh: Through; The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Dis’triCt Edocation Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) / 3. ThevBlock Education Officer, Block Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANOAM’US CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. Amit HIGH COURT OF CHHATT15GARH ‘ BiLASPwR WRIT PETETION §Sl No.6260 OF 200$ PETmONER Mummar Choudhary Versus RESPGNDENTS State of Chhamsgarh and others {Writ petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Siegke Bench : Hon’ble $hri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present :- Shri D. R. Patei, counsel for the pe’I3tioner. $hri P. K. Bhaduri. Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. oRAL ORDER (Passed an this 29th day- cf october, 2009) With the consent of iearned oouneei appearing for ihe parties, the petition is heard hnaiiy. 2} Learned counsei appearing for the petiticner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. Hewever, iearned counsei subrnits that the case is squareiyi-oovered by order dated 24—8-1 982 passed by the Madhya Pradesh $tate Administrative Tribunai‘ Jabaipur in QA. No 2745/1989 (Madhukant Yaeiu ane‘ >58 Gthere Ve. State of MR and Others). The said order passed by-the Ti‘i'ounai has been taken to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court was pieased to confirm the order passed by the Tribunal by order dated 34—19% in SLP. (C) No.6892/93. Shri Patei submits that the petitioner has made representation dated 01~O6-2i)99 (Annexure-P/Z) before the respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided tiii date. 3) Shri Bhaduri, teamed Panei Lawyer for the State submits that the nending representation of the petitioner snail be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in aooordance with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt ot a copy of this order. 4) tn View of foregoing, according to iearned counsel for the petitioner nothing survives in the matter. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. x ,2f) l . Sd/- “ Satish K. Agnthotrt ' i Judge Wk i l i, l . l: l i