IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2008 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 CRP.No. 1394 of 2004 ---------------------- ( AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.7582/97 IN OS.825/1997 of II ADDL. MUNSIFF'S COURT,THRISSUR.) REVN. PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS --------------------------------------------------------- 1. KATREENA, D/O.CHOVUKKARAN THOMAKUTTY, HOUSE NO.X/857, TEKKE ANGADI, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. ELYAKUTTY, D/O.CHOVUKKARAN TOMAKUTTY, HOUSE NO.X/857, TEKKE ANGADI, THRISSUR. 3. KUNJETHY, D/O.CHOVUKKARAN THOMAKUTTY, HOUSE NO. X/857, TEKKE ANGADI, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS: --------------------------------------------------- THRISSUR KALDAYA SURIYANI PILLAI, REPRESENTED BY TRUSTEES: 1. PAUL, S/O. MULAKKAL INASU, CHELAKKOTUKARA DESOM, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. JOHNSON, S/O.ARIMBOOR MOOPPAN ANTHAPPAN, CHEMBUKKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. CRP.No. 1394 of 2004 3. THOMAS, S/O. MAPRANAM ANTHAPPAN, KURIYACHIRA DESOM, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 4. PAULCY JOSEPH, S/O.CHEERAMBAM JOSEPH, CHEMBUKKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 5. IGNATIOUS, S/O.MANGALATHUKARAN ANTHONY, CHEMBUKKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 6. JOSEPH JOHNY, S/O.KANGAPADAN JOSE, NEHRU NAGAR, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 7. INASU, KUNAMTHUMKARA DESOM, OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 8. ANTONY, S/O.CHOVUKKARAN DEVASSY, CHEROOR DESOM, VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. ............................................... C.R.P. No. 1394 OF 2004 .................................................. Dated this the 11th December, 2008 O R D E R This Revision came up in the defect list. The Registry has got telephonic information that O.S.No. 825 of 1997 on the file of the II Addl. Munsiff's Court, Thrissur, from which this Revision arises, was disposed of on 11.04.2008. The order impugned in this Revision was passed in that Suit. The Civil Revision Petition has therefore become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk