1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1873 OF 1998 Bhor Kamgar Union & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Bhor Industries Ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.M.Palshikar for the petitioners. Mr.K.S.Bapat for the respondent. Mr.Nivrutti Mellari Shivtare, petition No.2 present in person. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 19TH JULY, 2010 P.C.: 1. The petition has been filed by the Union against the respondent in respect of claims of an employee i.e. the petitioner No.2. Consent terms have been handed over by the parties duly signed by the petitioner No.2, the Director of the respondent and their respective advocates. Petitioner No.1 which is the Union has not signed the consent terms. The General Secretary of the petitioner No.1 Union is unwell and according to Mr. Palshikar, the Union has no objection 2 for these consent terms being handed in, as asserted in the letter dated 16.7.2010, which is taken on record. 2. The consent terms are accepted, taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 3. Writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms. ..... 3