IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1821 of 2005 Between: Smt. Kalapala Vazram W/o.Late Gangayya @ Ganga Raju Hamlet of Ankalampadu, Kamavarapukota (M) West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kamavarapukota Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. The Ankalampadu Grama Panchayat, rep. by its Secretary Ankalampadu, Kamavarapukota (M) West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the proposed action of the respondent to demolish the residential hut and to dispossess me from an extent of 0.04 cents out of 0.11 cents situated in s.No.345 of Ankalampadu Village of Kamavarapukota Mandal, West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The writ petition is filed for declaring the proposed action of the respondent to demolish the residential hut and to dispossess the petitioner from an extent of 0.04 cents out of 0.11 cents situated in Survey No.345 of Ankalampadu village of Kamavarapukota Mandal, West Godavari District, as arbitrary and illegal. 2. When the matter was taken up admission on 07.02.2005, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested time for producing relevant documents regarding the claim of the petitioner that she has been in possession of the house in question for the past 70 years. Today, when the matter is taken up admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been produced any of such documents relating to the possession of the house in question by the petitioner though he sought for adjournment. 3. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed. No or as to costs. ____________________ (ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J) Date: 16.06.2005 Ksn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kamavarapukota Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. The Secretary, Ankalampadu Grama Panchayat, Ankalampadu, Kamavarapukota (M) West Godavari District. 3. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL}