HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR WritPeti.tionfaNQ.3Q48of2C>08 c;., Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. ! 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Shashaak Khetau, S/o Shri Sunil Kumar Klietaii, aged about 24 years, R/o Ganeshram Nagar, Raipur, ISahsil aad District Raipur (CG) State of Ch.hattisgarh, Tbrougli the Secretaiy, Department of Revenue, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Ctthattisgarh) State ofChhattisgarh, througfa the Secretary, Deparbment of Industries, Mantralaya, DKS BIiawau, Raipur (CIihattisgarh) Director, Directorate of ladusfries, Chliatysgarh, Paadri, Raipur District, Raipur (ChUattisgarh) . CoUector, Raipur, District Raipur (Chliattisgarh) Ghliattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, Jeevan Beeaia Vyayaaayik Parisar, Paadri, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Distnct Industries & Trade Centre, Raipixr through its General Maaager, Raipur (CIihatfisgarh) Sub Diwisional Of6cer-cuni-Land Acquisition OfBcer, Raipur (Chliattisgarh) WRIT PETETON UNDER ARTICLE 226 &F_THE CONSTmmONOP INDIA. (SB: Hon'ble SIm SatisfaK. AgitihotriJ.) Shri Saajay K. Agarwal, Advocate with Shri Sudeep Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri AIok Bafcshi, Oovt. Advocate for the resp&xidents/State. Shri Ayaj Naved, Advocate for fhe CIihattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporatioii Ltd. ORDBRtoran - (PassedonthisI7&dayofJuly,2009) Heard. 1. Shri Ayaj Naved, leamed coimsel appeanng forfhe Chhattisgarli State ludustrial Devetopment Corporation Ltd., on fhe basis of the retum dated 2.3.2009, filedmWritPetition (C) No. 2688/2008, subiuits that thfi Special Secretaxy, Gkivemmeirtl iaf CUiatds^tii, Coimnerce and Industeies Departtnent, by lietter ' n i Tiialiur dated 15th September, 2008 has informed the CoUector, Raipur fhat fh.e Qovemxneiit has tatcen a decision not to acquire the laad of villages Dhansuli aad Sankri for estabUshnieut of uprale park ia Raipur district. Shri Alok Bakshi, leamed counsel appearuig for the respondents/State subinits fhat the appropriate notification, de-notifyiug the acquisition of land ia regard to the nott&cation m. question, shaU be issued by the CoUector, Raipur, ittrmediately. In view of the foregoing, accordiag tolearued counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothiug siuvives in fhis writ petition for adjudication. The petition is accordiagly disiaissed'as haviug beeom.e mfructuous. No order asto costs. : Sdl- \ t- SatishK.Agmhotri j ^ - Judge. ___-—JI