IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2009 / 29TH SRAVANA 1931 OP.No. 10826 of 1998(L) ----------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K.P.SANTHOSH, S/O.KUNHAMBU, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.KAY CEE TRANSPORT, STATE BAZAR, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD. 3. STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.V.BHASKARA MENON, SC, KSRTC SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR R4 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2009, ALONG WITH OP NO. 7168 OF 1995 OP NO. 10701 OF 1998 THE COURT ON 20/08/2009 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P. No.10826 OF 1998 ---------------------------------------- Dated, 20th day of August , 2009 JUDGMENT This writ petition was once dismissed as infructuous. Subsequently , R.P.No.803/2007 was filed on the basis of which the earlier judgment of this Court dated 7.12.2006 in this writ petition was recalled. This Court, by order dated 23.8.2007 in CMA No.357/2007 in the review petition, passed an order to the effect that, “in case the vehicle KL.13.P 4599 has valid permit, for the only reason that the O.P.No.10826/98 was dismissed, the petitioner shall not be prevented from operating the vehicle”. In the review petition, the petitioner has stated that as per the decision of the authority, the permit was renewed which was in force till 13.1.2009. No order is seen produced before this Court to the effect that said permit was subsequently renewed and having valid permit in force at present. So, factually, the writ petition became infructuous and accordingly, the same is dismissed. V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE kvm/- -:2:- V.K.MOHANAN, J. O.P.No. JUDGMENT Dated:..