IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30753 of 2009 MD.IQBAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.34983 of 2009 RASHID Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 5.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State. Petitioner Md. Iqbal of Cr. Misc. No. 30753 of 2009 is said juvenile. So he needs his age assessed by the court where the case is pending including the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi in Nanpur P.S.Case No. 53 of 2009 and pray for bail from the Juvenile Justice Board. With such observation, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. For petitioner namely, Rashid of Cr. Misc. No. 34983 of 2009 it is said that he was armed with a piece of wood only with no specification of his assault lacking intention to kill which occurred only after some altercation but all the six accused have been shown causing assault though after some altercation but different weapons. If the intention was not to kill can never be scrutinized at this stage. The act to assault is collective act of all the accused. So no liberal view can be taken for this petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is also rejected. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)