1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the First day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.7958 of 2011 K.SRINIVASAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAPPAGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO.156 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 307 I.P.C., in Crime No.156 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and a false case has been registered against him for the offence under Sections 294(b), 324 and 307 I.P.C., and the investigation is considerably over and he apprehends for arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital and the investigation is going on. He would further submit that the petitioner has 5 previous cases and he is a history sheeted rowdy and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 19.06.2011 at 3.00 p.m., and a case has been registered on the same day for the offence under Sections 294(b), 324 and 307 I.P.C., and the injured was discharged from the hospital and even though, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner has 5 previous cases and he is a history sheeted rowdy but, the respondent police has not taken any steps to arrest him and even though he was neither interfered with the investigation nor absconding from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 01/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAPPAGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR. No.25461 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7958 of 2011 Date :01/08/2011 RJ/2.8.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/