IN T? HIGH COURT OF KAR’ATAK AT BANG4IO DATED T13 TT 5th DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEF ORE TIE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. MOHAN KJM WRIT PET! 030 1998 ET WEE N: Yallappa S/s Ningappa Sindnal, Kajar, residing at Toranagatti, Taluka Ramadurga, District Belgaum. ,,,PETITIOR (By Sri G.Balakrishna Shastry, Adv.) AND: 1. The Additional iaabour Court Hubli, by its presiding Officer, District Dharwar. 2. Katkol Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha Limited, Katkol, Taluka Ramadurga, District Belgaum by its Chairman. •6 .REpOZENS (By Sri T.P.Nabiar, Adv.) This writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the Can stitution of India with a prayer to quash vide Annx.A dt.11.3.98 by Ri. This writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day the Court made the fol1owing: —2— OR D ER There is no appearance for the petitioner. The claimant in question is alleged to have dismissed frorn service in the year 1976. He raised a dispute after a lapse of 19 years, i.e. in 1996. One do not what is tP rGason for the delay in raisir the dispute. has made certain allegations in the claim statement. None of the allegatiorniade are sufficient to enlarge the period, There is no explanation explaining the delay. Therefore the Labour Court was justified in rejecting the reference. I do not find ny ground to interfere with the award of the Labour Court. 4rit petition is duismissed. ksp/n av