:1: 1675.11-wp bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1675 OF 2011 Harishchandra Pandurang Keni & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Nausli N. Wadia & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.G.S.Godbole i/b. Mohan V. Kanade for Petitioners. Mr.Arif Bookwala i/b. S.B. Amini for Respondent Nos.1,2 and 4. CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI,J. DATE :- APRIL 25, 2011 P.C. 1. The order impugned is purely interlocutory. In any event, if the order in the suit is adverse to the interest of the petitioners and is required to file an appeal, the petitioners can very well challenge the impugned order, under the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1A of the Code of Civil Procedure. In that view of the matter, no case is made out to interference with the impugned order, in the extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. The petition is, therefore, rejected. 2. In view of the fact that the suit is of 1995, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the hearing of the suit and conclude the same within one year from today. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)