-^••vJ't-.'V U ^-^•V^'u'^-^-J'^^-^-^-^-'u- ^- ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR c ^- ^ MISC. APPEAL NO/ 0A?F 2009 Sfl&le fi@Bcfi ^^' MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNbER ORbER 43 RULE 1M/CObE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 Appellant faintiff < •» ^<^:^^" ^WW'..G^^' ^^^ -^..^ ^••••t' Resoondents /befendants €^ ^Bratap Rai Ahuja - Choudhary, S/o Shri Laxmandas, R/o Kashyap Colony, Bilaspur Tehsil<& Oistt. Bilaspur (C.G) Versus l.^.. Jai Bhagwan Agrawal, aged 53 year S/o Late Bhunduram Agrawal, R/o Vidyanagar Ward No. 14, House No. 309. Tehsil <& Oistt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Suresh Kumar Kachchwaha, aged about 35 years, S/o Late t)auram Kachchwaha, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Pachrighat, Tehsil and bistt. Bilaspur (CG) 3. Rajkumar Kachchwaha, aged 45 ^ years, S/o bauram Kachchwaha, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Pachrighat. Tehsil & bistt. Bilaspur (CG) >• Pawan Kumar Kachchwaha,aged 38 years, S/o Dauram Kachchwaha, R/o Bus Stand, Imlipara, Tehsil <& Distt. Bilaspur (CG) 5,. Smt. Jamuna BaiKachchwaha, aged 65 yeas, Wd/o Dauram Kachchwaha, R/o Juna Bilaspur, Pachrighat, Tehsil <& bistt. Bilaspur (CG) 6^ Smt. Ranno Bai, aged 37 years, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar Kchchwaha. © ^" -7. Vikki Kachchwaha, S/o Late Krishna Kumar, aged 13 years, minor, through Natural Guardian Mother Rannio Bai, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar Kachchwaha. ^- ^, Komal Kachchwaha, through Natural Guardian Mother Rannio Bai, Wd/o Late Krishna Kumar Kachchwaha. (Sl.No.6 to 8 R/o of Sabji Mandi, Katni, Tehsil <& Distt. Katni (M.P.) (Note: Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the refusal of temporary injunction application , though filed U/s 151, Code. of Civil Procedure) y \dwi ^i^irt^, y-rfl<^i<&, Rlrtw^ ^- ..!vl.fc......J.&6., iTTTR5T^^7^ 3T1^5TcpTR^icb wnsn^srawte ^ A^l>/ Sahu 3H^9T traq? (ijcl^clc^) ^20^ ?^<HWr ;Hf^T 3T1^5T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K, 01.2.2010 Shri Sanjay S AgrawalJ Shri HB Agrawal, Sr.| cPI<4lo<TlT1 411+1«V^"f^<-£lxf^l^l^ ^ 3lKl+< 3IT^"5T Aaarwal Advocate forthe appellant. 'Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for respondent No. Shri Rajesh Kumar Shs|rma, Advocate for respondent No.4. None for other respond) Shri Sanjay S Agrawal,) submits that the appellant sh^ the time granted by this cour) the appetlant counsel, Shri| appearing for respondent No| ents. learned counsel appearing for appellant »11 cooperate in disposal of the suit within t. In view of above submission made by HB Agrawal, learned senior counsel 1 submits that the respondent No. 1 is ready not to continue with th^ construction work over the suit land till disposal of the suit. In view of above, the a(|)peal is disposed of and it is directed that the respondent No. 1 shall over the suit land till disposal The appeilant is also d ^ot continue with the construction work ofthesuit. < rected to cooperate in the matter so that the suit may be decided withii|i the time a6 granted by this court. With the above directi<|>n, this appeal is disposed of. No order asto costs. Certified copy, as per n Ijles. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge