IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9811 of 2006 Sujeet Kumar Sharma, Son of Sri Rambasawan Sharma, R/o Sabajpura, P.s. Danapur, District – Patna …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna 3. The Collector, Patna 4. The District Education Officer, Gaya 5. The Block Development Officer, Danapur, Patna 6. Seema Devi, Mukhia, Jamaluddinchak Gram Danapur, Patna 7. The Headmaster, Primary School, Sabajpur, P.S. Danapur, District – Patna …..Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s Ramesh Singh, Purshotam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Kundan, A.C. to G.P. XI ----- 2 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to move before the newly constituted appellate authority under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Sewa Sert) Niyamawali, 2006 ( as amended by Amendment Rules 2008) (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules). Learned counsel for the State raises no 2 objection. Permission is accorded. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail the forum of appeal. If such an appeal is filed by the petitioner within eight weeks from today before the concerned appellate authority, the same shall be considered on its own merit and disposed of in accordance with law within the time prescribed in the Rules. It is made clear that this Court has not formed any opinion with regard to the merit of the case of the petitioner. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)