1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2660 OF 2010 (Jeevan G. Barai vs. Rakesh S. Bodad) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 15, 2010. Heard Shri Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner. The trial Court has rejected the prayer of the petitioner – defendant to declare his witnesses as hostile after noticing that the application was moved after their cross examination was complete. Shri Pande, learned counsel has pointed out that in examination-in-chief only the witnesses have turned hostile and their cross examination was really not necessary. He further states that the junior who attended the case on his behalf on the relevant date, was not aware of the technical requirements and hence did not seek leave immediately before the beginning of cross examination. I have perused the records. I do not find any perversity in the impugned order warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Hence, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the interim order after the suit is finally disposed of, in case occasion therefor 2 arises, writ Petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.