1 47 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2327/2009 (J.V.V.N.L., Jodhpur Vs. Lal Chand & Anr.) Date of Order :: 22nd April 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Sumeet Mehta,for the petitioner. .... BY THE COURT Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material placed on record, this Court is unable to find any reason to consider any interference in the order dated 18.11.2006 as passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Sriganganagar setting aside imposition of the penalty by the petitioner in the sum of Rs.14,870/- against the consumer. The learned Lok Adalat has recorded the finding that the Petitioner Company has failed to establish by cogent evidence that the consumer indulged into theft of electricity while interfering with the service wires. The learned Lok Adalat has also pointed out the submissions of the consumer that the enquiry report was not drawn in his presence. Looking to the overall facts and circumstances, the view as taken by the Permanent Lok Adalat appears to be a possible view of the matter; and the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error leading to manifest injustice. There is hardly any reason to consider any interference in this matter in writ jurisdiction. This writ petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. 2 s.soni