1 SBCW NO. 238/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 238/2009 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Shri Lalaram etc. and Anr. Date of Order : : 23.03.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. L.K.Purohit, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. By the instant writ petition, the petitioner State has challenged the Award dated 7.9.2006 (Annex.3) passed by Industrial Dispute Tribunal and Labour Court, Jodhpur (for short 'the Labour Court' hereinafter) whereby the Labour Court held the respondents entitled for the selection scale from the date when they were declared semi-permanent. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents are not entitled for the selection scale from the date when they were declared semi-permanent. In State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Farooq Ahmed and Anr. 2005 (1) RLW, (Raj.) 565, Full Bench of this Court held that where a person is appointed on adhoc/ temporary basis in 2 SBCW NO. 238/2009 accordance with the rules and in time scale, the period of adhoc/ temporary services rendered by him/her, before his/her regularisation, should be counted for the purpose of grant of selection grade on completion of 9.18 & 27 years of service, as the case may be. In view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Farooq Ahmed and Anr. (supra), the writ petition is devoid of any merit and it is therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp 3 SBCW NO. 238/2009 S.B.CIVIL MISC. STAY PETITION NO. 470/2009 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 238/2009 Date of Order : 23/03/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. L.K.Purohit, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the petitioners. Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed, the stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp