IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1940 of 2011 Date of decision: 21.4.2011 Bhagwan Singh … Petitioner versus Jaspal Singh and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for recovery of damages. He is aggrieved with the order dated 22.1.2011 by virtue of which his application for additional evidence has been dismissed. The facts, in brief, are that the plaintiff had examined Dr.Kuldip Rai Garg as a witness stating that the arrival of Bhagwan Singh in the hospital was at about 8.30 PM on 14.5.2005 and he medico-legally examined him at 8.40 PM. Now it has been claimed that in fact, Bhagwan Singh was admitted in hospital at 8.30 AM and not 8.30 PM as inadvertently stated by the said doctor. Further elaborating, the ruqa regarding admission of Bhagwan Singh was sent at 9 AM, which indicates that he was actually admitted in hospital at 8.30 AM and not 8.30 PM. Heard. A bare perusal of the impugned order indicates that what had been stated by Dr. Kuldip Rai Garg is from the MLR and as such, re-examination of the said doctor will not serve the purpose as he would again depose according to what had been recorded in the MLR. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out as to for what purpose, C.R. No. 1940 of 2011 -2- examination of the Investigating Officer is to be conducted. In this back- drop of the facts, the application for additional evidence has rightly been dismissed by the trial Court. No intereference is called for. The revision petition is dismissed. April 21, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE