1 WP 10236/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10236 OF 2010 (Mininath s/o Somnath Nannavre Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.R.Chaukidar, Adv., h/f Mr. N.C.Garud, Adv., for the petitioner. Mrs. V.A.Shinde, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Respondent Nos.3 to 5 served. Mr. S.T.Shelke, Adv., for Respondent no. 5. ... CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND S.B.DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE:July 6th, 2011 ... 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, seeking permission to appear for Departmental Examination, as a special case, and in view of Rule 6A inserted vide the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Service Post Recruitment Examination (Amendment) 2 WP 10236/2010 Rules, 1999 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961. He further submits that, in view of the communication dated 11th Nov.,1994 ( Exh.H to the writ petition), the Chief Executive Officer has discretion to allow one or two more attempts, as a special case, to an employee, such as the petitioner. 3. We do not wish to express any opinion in respect of the submission advanced by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and, we are satisfied that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by following order. (i) The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. (ii) If the petitioner makes representation, within a period of four weeks from today, the same may be considered on merits in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and, preferably, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. We hope that the Chief Executive Officer shall communicate the order passed on the petitioner's representation immediately thereafter. 3 WP 10236/2010 It is made clear that while passing this order, we have not examined the merits of the case. (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) ... AGP/10236-10wp