^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S.) N0. ^"L'^-^ /2010 PETITIONER: ^^/ 41r ;-^- ^y Baratram Washing S/o Shri Hauram Washing, Aged about 49 years, Upper Division Teacher Governmetn Middle School, Faraswani, Block Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) •^'./\.. <?!w y VERSUS "<' ^ ^ RESPONDENTS 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh: Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Janjgir, Distt Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Block Dabhra, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. 3. w PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURTOF CHHATTSSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETiTION (S) N0.2270 OF 2010 Baratram Washing Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutjon of tndia) SlngEe Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Present :• Gowri Shri D.R. Patel, Advocate forthe petitioner.' Shri M.P.S.'Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 6m day of May, 2010) 1. Learned counseS appearing for the petstioner subiTiits that the petltjoner was appointed Inltialiy as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay cn probatlon. After compietion of his resp^^tive probation period, the petitiooer was grarsted regu!ar pay scale. Learned counsei further subniits that the sssue snvoived in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entlied' to regular pay scale w.e.L the date of initia! appoinftment or after compielJon of probatioo period. 2. Leamed counsei for the partles Jointiy sybmit that the jssue Invoived herein was considered by the i^adhya Pradesh State Admiiiistrative Tribunai, Jabaipur (for short "the SAT} in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukanf Yadu and 56 others vs. State ofM.P. & othei"s), wherein it was heid that the slmilariy situated teaohers are entltled to reguiar pay scaie w.eJ. th.e date of initiai eppointnnent. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Sypreme Coyrt, uphoidiiig the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scaie from date of ioitiai appolntment« 3. in view of the above submissions made by learoed counsei for the partles, the petitioner is granted Isberty to make a representation to the respondent authorities, if so advised, to consider his case and pass appropriaie order, on its ovvn merit and in its perspective, in the Sight of the order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequentiy confirmed by the Sypreme Court in Specia! Leave Petitioii (Civil) No. 6892/93 by order dated 3-1-1994. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. Sausu^fibatri judge