IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 29TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7043 of 2008(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.K. JOSE, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. KURIAKOSE, CHIRAKALKUDIYIL HOUSE, WARD NO.XIX, ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.MANU GOVIND RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ANGAMALY MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, ANGAMALY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SRI. NANU KUTTAN, S/O. AASARI VELAYUDHAN, AAVANAMKODE HOUSE, ANGAMALY. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 7043 of 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of February , 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that though the first respondent Municipality took action as per Ext.P2 for abating the encroachment on the municipal puramboke by the second respondent, till this moment the action has not been finalised. 2. I do not propose to go into the merits of the grounds raised or the genuineness of the grievance voiced. But, it seen that the Municipality has initiated action as per Ext.P2 and continued by Ext.P6. It is only appropriate that the Municipality brings the action so initiated to logical conclusion by conducting such enquiryies/measurmeent as are warranted, at the earliest. Accordingly, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing the first respondent Municipality to finalize the action initiated under Ext.P2 and continued under Ext.P6 at the earliest WPC No.7043/2008 2 and at any rate within six months of receiving a copy of this judgment. It is needless to mention that before final order was passed, the second respondent and the petitioner will be heard by the Municipality. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk