IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27623 of 2011 Bimla Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 17.08.2011 The matter has been listed for consideration of restoration application. This Court permitted the petitioner to make submission on merit to which he agreed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner had earlier approached this court for grant of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 17905 of 2011. said matter was considered and disposed of by order dated 26.03.2011 in the following terms: “After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application in order to move the court below for regular bail. Permission is accorded. The application is permitted to be withdrawn.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the mother-in-law and, therefore, requires sympathetic consideration. Considering the order dated 26.03.2011 and the facts pleaded in the application, in my view, the second application seeking anticipatory bail is devoid of merit. It is accordingly dismissed. Since I have considered the main application on merit, the application seeking restoration delves into insignificance. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )