IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO :1178 of 2010 Dated: 19.3.2010 Between: 1. K. Srinivas Reddy and another ..... PETITIONER AND The Osman Gunj Extension Co-op. Housing Society Limited, through his Secretary, Nandlal Vyas,Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:1178 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 16.02.2010 passed in I.A.No.121 of 2010 in R.A.No.43 of 2010 by the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, the present civil revision petition has been preferred. The revision petitioners are the tenants and the respondent is the landlord. The respondent-landlord filed RC No.230 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Rent Controller for fixation of Fair Rent. The Court below fixed rent at the rate of Rs.2,750/- per month from the date of petition with further enhancement of 10% every year on the existing rent. Feeling aggrieved by the orders of the Court below, the petitioners- tenants carried the matter in appeal. Along with the appeal, the petitioners-tenants filed the above application seeking to grant stay of operation of the order of the Court below in the above RC. The lower appellate Court granted interim stay on condition of the petitioners- tenants depositing half of the fair rent fixed by the Court below in R.C.No.230 of 2007. Aggrieved by the conditions imposed by the lower Appellate Court, the petitioners-tenants filed the present civil revision petition. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. It is the case of the revision petitioners-tenants that the eviction petition filed by the respondent-landlord is pending and the question as to whether there is a jural relationship between the parties or not is a subject matter of eviction petition and in the meanwhile, the respondent-landlord filed the above RC and there are malafides on the part of the respondent-landlord herein and therefore, the conditions imposed by the lower appellate Court are bad in law. Feeling aggrieved by the conditions imposed by the lower appellate Court while granting stay of operation of the order passed in R.C.No.230 of 2007, the present revision has been filed. The relief that is sought for in this revision is purely confined to the imposition of the conditions. Pending adjudication of the appeal, imposition of conditions by the lower appellate Court would not cause any prejudice and if the petitioners-tenants succeed in the appeal, they can avail the remedies that are open under law, to recover the same. In this view of the matter, I feel that the conditions imposed by the lower appellate Court while granting stay, are justified and they do not warrant any inference and hence, the revision petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 19th March, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:1178 OF 2010 19.03.2010