IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 901 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Kamar Alam .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 765/10 U/s 394, 397, 411, 120B IPC, PS Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. ___________________________________________________________________ Dated: October 8, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and even the recovery of articles shown to be made from the possession of the applicant have not been identified as per law before the Magistrate and he is in jail since 16.5.2010. He also submitted that co-accused Sunil Kumar and Neetu @ Dharamveer have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 12.8.2010 and 13.8.2010 respectively and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM Pauri Garhwal. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) October 8, 2010 Rdang