1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1077 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3659 OF 2003 Subodh K. Shetye ...Plaintiff Vs. Prabhakar Mehta ...Defendant ----- Mr.Kunal Cheema for Plaintiff ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff. 2. None appears on behalf of the Defendant, though he has been served and though affidavit in reply has been filed by him . 3. The Plaintiff seeks amendment in paragraphs 1(a) and 11 of the plaint. It is stated in the affidavit in support that in the third line of the cause title of the plaint, correction has to be made and instead of the word Mehboob the word Maimoon may be inserted. It is further stated that in paragraph 1A, an additional averment is to be made to the effect that 2 the Defendant is dwelling at the address mentioned in the cause title of the plaint and in third line in paragraph 11, the Plaintiff seeks to add one more line by mentioning that the Defendant is dwelling within the jurisdiction of this Court. 4. In my view, no prejudice will be caused to the Defendant if the Chamber Summons is allowed since the Plaintiff is seeking to give further particulars in paragraphs 1A and 11 and also for the purpose of making a correction of an inadvertent mistake which is occurred in cause title of the plaint. Hence, Chamber Summons is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. 5. Chamber Summons is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)