THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 14844 of 1999 Dated: 25.03.2010 Between: V.Kanaka Lakshmi … Petitioner And The Superintending Engineer, A.P. State Electricity Board Medak and 2 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No. 14844 of 1999 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a certiorari to call for the records relating to the award dated 30.04.1998 in I.D.No.98 of 1994 on the file of the Labour Court-II, A.P. Hyderabad and to quash the same being arbitrary and illegal. The said I.D.No.98 of 1994 was filed by the Writ Petitioner under Section 2-A (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 aggrieved by the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 07.06.1994 instructing the Assistant Engineers not to engage part time contingent employees and to dispense with their services. It was alleged that pursuant to the said instructions issued by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner was orally instructed not to attend the duty from 01.06.1994 even though similarly situated persons were continued in service. A counter was filed before the Labour Court by the respondents stating that the petitioner was not an employee of the Electricity Board and she was not even appointed as a contingent employee. It was further stated that the practice of engaging NMRs and casual labour was dispensed with in the Electricity Board long ago as departmental employees were posted to attend such work in different divisions. Having heard both the parties, the Labour Court recorded a finding that the petitioner had failed to prove that part time contingent posts were existing in the Electricity Board and that she had worked as a contingent employee at any point of time. Accordingly, I.D was dismissed. On a careful consideration of the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the Labour Court since the same are based on proper appreciation of the evidence available on record. This court is also satisfied that the findings did not suffer from any glaring perversity or unreasonableness. Hence, the impugned order warrants no interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Date: 25.03.2010 KLP