IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2039 of 2006 ANIL PRASAD JAISWAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 9. 2.3.2009 In the order dated 6.2.2009 in the third line of the second paragraph instead of the word “appointed” the words “recommended for appointment” should be read. In the same order in the second line of third paragraph the date of death should be read as “10.11.2004” instead of “10.11.2000.” In para-2 of page 2 of the said order instead of the words “recommended for his appointment on class IV since there were no vacancy in class III post” it should be read as “recommended for his appointment on class III post and if there were no vacancy in class III then in class IV post.” The order dated 6.2.2009 is accordingly modified to the above extent. S.Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)