IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2009 / 18TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19222 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOHAMMED RAFEEQUE ALI K., S/O.ALI KALAPPADAN, KALAPPADAN HOUSE, PATTARKADAVU, DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.M.LISHA SMT.SIMLA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHIPPALAM. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPPALAM. BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN - STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.19222 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner had completed the LLB Degree Course. The college, in which the petitioner had studied, is affiliated to the Calicut University. The petitioner had appeared for the 10th Semester Examination held in September, 2008. But, when the result was published, he failed in one paper viz., Human Rights Law. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by him, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the results of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in September, 2008 . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the result of the W.P.(C)No.19222 of 2009 :: 2 :: revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to 10th Semester LLB Degree Examination held in September, 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge