IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4277 of 2009 Shambhunath Singh, Son of Late Ram Rakhsha Singh, resident of Village- Hussaipur(Jagdeo Sirisia),P.O.- Hassaipur, P.S. Amraur, District- Saran…………………………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus 1. The East Central Railway through its General Manager, Hajipur, Bihar. 2. The Deputy Chief Engineer, E.C.Railway, Hajipur. 3. The Commercial Officer, E.C. Railway, Construction, Head Office, Hajipur. 4. Triloki Pandey. 5. Bulendar Pandey. 6. Anil Pandey. All sons of Late Ganesh Pandey, resident of Village- Piyarpurwa, P.O. Ishrauli, P.S. Marhaurrah, District-Saran. 7. Ram Chandra Rai, Son of Late Uasu Rai. 8. Bhagelu Mahto, Son of Dhanai Mahto. Both residents of Wajid Borha, P.S. Marhaurrah, District-Saran. 9. Sheo Mangal Mahto, Son of Bhushan Mahto. Resident of Talpuraina, P.S. Marhaurrah, District-Saran. 10. Bacha Rai, Son of Lakhan Rai, resident of Wajidpur Borha, P.S. Marhaurrah, District- Saran. 11. Ram Nath Prasad, Son of Bhushan Mahto, resident of Village- Talpraina, P.S. Marhaurrah, District-Saran. 12. Rajmani Devi, W/O Late Rajnan Pandey, resident of Wajid Bhorha, P.S. Marhaurrah, District-Saran. 13. Sipahi Mahto, Son of Algu Mahto, resident of Village- and P.O. Mirjapur Marhaurrah, District-Saran. 14. Banarsi Rai, S/O Late Lurki Rai, resident of Village- Wajid Bhorha, P.S. Marhaurrah, District- Saran. 15. Abhi rawan Rai, S/O Late Balak Rai, resident of Village- Wajid Borha, P.S. Marhaurrah, District- Saran…………..……...Respondents. 2. 02.09.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities not to release the payment of compensation to respondent nos. 4 to 15 for the land acquired by the Railway appertaining to Khata No.99 Khesra 2 Nos. 315, 322, Khata No. 305, Khesra Nos. 327, 347, 314 and Khata No. 326, Khesra No. 395 situated in village- Bazid Bhorha Thana No. 45, Anchal- Marhaurrah, District-Saran till disposal of Title Suit No. 619 of 2008 pending before the learned Sub Judge I, Saran at Chapra. In view of this Court, the petitioner should file his appropriate objection in the concerned land acquisition proceeding when it is expected from the concerned authorities to dispose of the same in accordance with law. With the above observation, this writ application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)