1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4179/2009 Alka Birla vs State of Raj & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : - 4.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. PS Bhati, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's grievance is that petitioner is not allowed to have re-evaluation of his answer books and as per the rules only re-totaling is allowed. The petitioner's contention is that he applied for re- totaling and also submitted application under the Right to Information Rules. The petitioner's re-totaling result has not been declared and his application filed under Right to Information Rules have not been responded. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the facts of the case. Since there is no provision of re-evaluation of the answer books, therefore, she is not entitled for re- evaluation of the answer book and he appeared in the process of selection and after taking part in the examination she has challenged the said procedure. So far as re-totaling 2 is concerned, that application according to the petitioner is pending, therefore, this writ petition cannot be entertained on this ground also. The petitioner has approached the authorities concerned for obtaining the information by filing the application under Right to Information Rules and complete procedure has been given in rules that how the application is to be treated and dealt with and in case any grievance remains then how the grievance can be redressed by the appellate authority. In view of the above reasons, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-