Sjngie Ben©h / ^—zr 0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. ^3 ^° OF 2009. PETITIONER ^--BITikham Lal Sahu, S/o. late Shri Nirbhay Ram Sahu, aged about 61 years, Retired Deputy Ranger, R/o. Near of Electricity Office, Bortara Road, Gurur, District Durg (C.G.) V ERS U S RESPONDENTS ^ ^%^ ^•M^' ^•^'y' '^^.'•1 ^yv <rr^~~Sta.teof Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) The Accountant General, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3^-—Divisional Forest Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^s HIGH COURT OF CHI-SATTISGARH : BSLASPUR WRiTPETJTJON_(SlNO._5330_QF_2009 Bhikham Las Sahu RESPGNDENTS Versus State of Chhattlsgarh & Others (Writ petition under Artjcie 226 of the CorsStitution of Indla) SIngae Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Vsrma, counseS for the petitioner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyer for the State» Ms Fouzia Mirza, counsei for the respondent No.2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on th.'s 17th day of September,2099) 1. With the consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, th© petition is heard finaiiy. 2. By the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for directlon to the respondent No.2 to correct his GPF account and show the exact iotal amount deposited sn the GPF account, as there is a - difference in the amount shown In' hls pass book of the GPF account and in the AG siip issued by the respondent No2. 3. Learned counsei appearing for the petitloner, on instructions, 3ul3mlts that the petitloner does not v^ant to contest this petition on merits at this stage and prays that the petitloner may be permjtted to make a representatlon to the respondent-authorities to consider hls case withln stipulated time. 3. Learned counsel appeanng for the respondent No.2 submlts that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same shali be consldered and declded, in accordance with taw and on ite own merits, as expeditiousiy as posslble, preferably within a perlod of to/o months from the date of recelpt of the representatlon. 4. In view of foregoing, accordjng to tne learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, nothing survlves in this petltion for adjudication. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition Is disposed of. Gowrl Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge