gst 1 cra51.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2011. Pushpam Plaza Pvt. Ltd. ... ..... ..... ..Applicant. V/s Moinuddin Allarakha Banatwala & Ors. ..... ..Respondents. Mr.Ashok Daver i/by M/s.Mulani & Co., Adv. For the applicant. Mr.S.A.Bhagwat, Adv. For respondent No.1. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 13th April, 2011 PC: By way of present revision application the applicant challenges the order dated 19.12.09 vide which an application filed by the present applicant for obstructing the execution of decree in respect of 135C came to be rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the obstructionist- applicants are purchasers who have purchased the plot of 135/B from Roshani Mehta and as such they have also a right to use 135/C for parking vehicles. 3. Learned trial Court has found that the applicants have failed to produce any material on record to show that they have any right in respect of plot No. 135(C). On the contrary learned trial Court has found that the documents produced on record by decree holder i.e. Malmata Patrak shows that the plot No.8(c) which has been renumbered as plot No.135(C) was owned by Maunddin Banatwalal who is executor of the will of Mr.Talathi. 4. In that view of the matter it cannot be said that jurisdiction exercised by the learned trial Court has been exercised with material irregularity so as to warrant interference in revisional jurisdiction. Revision Application stands rejected.