IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6481 of 2000 Between: 1 Smt. Pedda Kasturi, W/o. Varahalu, R/o. Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam. 2 Smt. Tammineni Seethamma, W/o. Satyam, R/o. Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam. 3 Smt. Pedda Suryamma, W/o. Prakasa Rao, R/o. Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam. 4 Smt. T. Lakshmi Andalamma, W/o. Krishnarao, R/o. Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam. 5 Smt. Y. Lakshmi Kanthamma, W/o. Balaram, R/o. Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of A.P, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling , Visakhapatnam. 3 Visakhapatanam Urban Development Authoeity, Rep by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. 4 Surveyour, Office of the Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:SRI BOYA RAVINDER REDDY FOR MR.R.M.REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE FOR R1,R2 & R4 SMT V.PREETHI REDDY FOR R3. The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ or order with the following substantive relief: “to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in handing over the non-surplus property of the petitioners and other legal heirs of Sri S.Sanyasayya, admeasuring 10,500 sq. mts. situated in Survey No.2/1 of Madhavadhara village, Visakhapatnam, to the 3rd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner in respect of the said property of the petitioners and the other legal heirs of late Sri S.Sanyasayya and to pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems ﬁt and proper.” At the hearing, Sri Boya Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri R.M.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted and the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequal to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.8570 of 2000 is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 14.10.2008 v v