IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32409 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JUSTIN JOY, S/O. RAJAYYAN, AGED 41 YEARS,RAJA BHAVAN, KOTTUKUNNAM P.O. VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DILEEP, S/O. DARMASHEELAN, AGED 29 YEARS, VILLAYILVEEDU, KOTTUKKUNNAM.P.O VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU.P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 005. 2. ABDUL SALAM, S/O. POOKUNJU, AGED 44 YEARS, ARAMAN ROCK PRIVATE LTD., KEEZHAIKONAM, NELLANADU.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 006 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32409/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1(A)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 14674 DATED 18/10/2011 ISSUED FRO 6 MM METAL BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P1B)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 455 DATED 19/11/2011 FROM 6MM METAL BY A.C. CRUSHER EXHIBIT-P1(C)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 127 DATED 21/11/2011 ISSUED FROM 6 MM METAL BY ANANTHAPURI BLUE METALS EXHIBIT-P2(A)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 10285 DATED 09/08/2011 ISSUED FOR 12 MM METAL BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2(B)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 14938 DATED 24/10/2011 ISSUED FROM 12 MM METAL BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2(C)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL ON. 212 DATED 09/11/2011 ISSUED FROM 12 MM METAL BY A.V. CURSHER EXHIBIT-P2(D)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 11288 DATED 22/11/2011 BY M.K.V BRICKS AND BLUE METALS PRIVATE LIMITED. EXHIBIT-P3(A)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 14352 DATED 12/10/2011 ISSUED FOR DUST BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3(B)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 43548 DATED 26/11/2011 ` ISSUED FOR DUST BTY POABS GRANITE (P) LTD. EXHIBIT-P3(C)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 3974 DATED 05/10/2011 ISSUED FOR METAL DUST BY NEENA CRUSHER INDUSTRY. EXHIIBIT-P3(D)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 118 DATED 02/11/2011 ISSUED FOR DUST BY A.V. CRUSHER EXHIBIT-P4(A)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 15632 DATED 08/11/2011 ISSUED FROM 6 MM METAL BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4(B)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 15615 DATED 08/11/2011 ISSUED FOR 20 MM METAL BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4(C)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 15673 DATED 09/11/2011 ISSUED FOR 20 MM METAL BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P4(D)- TRUE COPY OF THE BILL NO. 15180 DATED 28/10/2011 ISSUED FOR DUST BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE REQUESTING PUBLIC CALL TO PARTICIPATE IN DHARNA BY THE CHAIRMAN AND CONVENER OF JOINT COUNCIL. WPC NO.32409/11 -2- EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT1.11.2011 ADDRESING CHIEF MINISTER. EXHIBIT P8: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT 7.11.11. EXHIBIT P9: TRUE COPY OF NEWS REPORTED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER MALAYALA MANORAMA DT 29.11.11. EXHIBIT P10:TRUE COPY OF E NEWS REPORTED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER KERALA KAUMUDI DT 29.11.11. EXHIBIT P11:TRUE COPY OF COPY OF THE NOTICE DT 22.11.11. EXHIBIT P12:TRUE COPY OF REPORT PUBLISHED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER MADHYAMAM DATED 30.11.11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32409 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioners, the quarry owners including the 2nd respondent had increased the price of quarry products which was complained of before the 1st respondent. It is stated that thereupon the 1st respondent convened a meeting of all concerned and that accordingly on agreement with the parties, the prices were fixed. 2. Now what is complained of is that, violating the said agreement, 2nd respondent is selling his products at higher prices. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 3. Since the case of the petitioners is that the 2nd respondent is violating an agreement that was arrived at in the presence of the 1st respondent, it is for the 1st respondent to interfere with the matter. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition leaving it open to the petitioners to move the 1st respondent and the 1st respondent shall take appropriate action in the matter. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp