[^K 'Si.. MI<3M(^UR^©KgHH/^IS6^HAtBIl^ M;GlC.N6.3l1df2010 APPl-ICANT: Appellarit M/sShadani Buildeir^^apartngrship firm; 'duly registere^ wuncler^ "the Partnerehip Act, havine|%6fnce a^^^ Sant SHadani; NagEir, IDh^mtari Road,Tahsil&District;Raipiur(CG) Versus NON-APPLIGANT: Respondent M/s Begraj Agrawal,^ Rai'U'jershiR firm.with Head QfficeatC-S'i.lVIIG/ Shailendra Nagar,;i F^ipur ^(CG) Present Address N@£irfR'aHlajani Nurshling Home, SKankar- Nagar, Raipur(CG):....-.:,:';'::;,:.'^:;.:'1:;-;- Present: Dr.Shailesh ShriSachih , counsel forthe applicant. Rajputj cbunselforthe respohdent. Division Behch: Moni'bleSHri DhirendraMishra& . HOn'bl&iSnriR;N.ehandrakar.J.J.% ;^^,:R.D.EIR'; ... • .1: !' ./ r :r(25-6.-2010);;;;:' •: •- '- : \'1 .^•^..."^ 1. The appliGant Kas filed i this MC;G and prayed for retymiof barik guSraritee fumisRed by tHe^pplicantlTerem^^fo^ aldhg withtheirapplicatiohdatecl 27-8-2007 in Arh. Appeal No.25/2007 {M/sShadani BuildersVsi. M/s BegrajAgrawal). :''/ : iw^^^^^^^^^^^^ 2. The above ArbitrationAppeal was disposed of by this Court vide^orde^ dated 2W March, 2009, howeVer, while passihg^^^ there isnOorderregardingban^gyaranteefurnishedbytlieapplic^t^^ 3. SHri Ahuja, learned cbynsel for the applicant submitted?tliati the respondent has alreaciyinitiatedexeeUtioriproceeaings;ofthe^ passed in theirfaVourbeforetheDjstritrtJudge.Raipurandimn^ property of theapplicarit these circumstances, applicant may be returned District Judge, Raipur fdr| A/2007. Bssass^ :^^^:^^.^jK^SsSi^^^^^iis^ ^?^'Bl^ssss:s^^^^ is likely to be attached and auctioned. In original bank guarantee furnished by the or the same may be transferred to the including the same in Arbitration Case No.9- 4. Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondent and submits that he has no objection if bank guarantee is directed to be transferred to the Court of the District Judge, Raipur for attaching the same inArbitration Case No.9-A/2007. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the original record of Arbitration Appeal No.25/2007 and final order dated 2nd March, 2009. 6. Since there is no order regarding bank guarantee furnished by the applicant in the above order, we areof the opinion that bank guarantee furnished by the applicant should be transferred to the Court of District Judge, Raipurfor including the same inArbitration CaseNo.9-A/2007. Ordered Accordingly. Compliance should be done forthwith. Barve 7 MCC is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- DMrendra Mishra Judge •s. Sdl- R.N. Chandrakar Judge