1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3690 OF 2010. Maulana Azad Shikshan Prasarak Va Krida Mandal .vs. The State of Mah. & others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.R. Joharapurkar, Advocate for petitioner, CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 17, 2010. The petitioner has challenged the rejection of his proposal for opening a secondary school in Urdu. The proposal has been rejected by the respondent No.1 on the ground that the facilities are not available in the school and there is no recent agreement of tenancy. We have perused the documents on record and Mr. M.R. Joharapurkar, learned Advocate for petitioner, has also submitted a true certified copy of the report, which is marked ‘X’ for identification, which shows the existence or otherwise of facilities. We find that the Block Development Officer has not been able to ascertain various infrastructural 2 facilities such as the number of rooms in the building where the school is proposed, the existence of bathroom and the existence of furniture. There is neither a tick-mark affirming the existence of these facilities nor denying the existence of these facilities. Moreover, it seems that the updated tenancy agreement has also not been submitted to the authorities. In the circumstances, it is difficult to see why the decision rejecting the petitioner’s proposal should be interfered with on the ground that it is unreasonable. In fact, we find that in the petition, there is no positive statement on oath that the aforesaid facilities are all available. In the circumstances, there is no merit in this petition, which is hereby rejected. Judge Judge J.