mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3038 of 2008 Sau Sagunabai G. Pawshe & ors. .. Petitioners versus M/s.Triveni Constructions & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.M.S. Kumthekar for the petitioners. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 18th July 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In so far as the view taken by the trial court that the suit has been properly valued and is covered by the provisions of clause 6 Rule 4(j) does not merit any interference. 3. The grievance of the petitioner that other contentions were raised before the trial court but have not been addressed need not be examined in this court for the first time. The petitioner is free to take out fresh application before the trial court calling upon the trial court to address those questions on its own merits which application will be decided in accordance with law. This liberty is granted having regard to the fact that in the impugned order only one issue has been addressed regarding valuation of the suit. Other contentions which were raised by the petitioner have been adverted to in paragraph nos.3 and 4 of the order but those issues have not been considered which is obvious for the points formulated by the court in paragraph no.7 of the order. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)