IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3233 of 2011 1. SUDARSHAN THAKUR SON OF LATE CHANDRADEEP THAKUR 2. SHAKUKNTLA DEVI W/O SUDARSHAN THAKUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUMITRA DEVI W/O SRI MANTU THAKUR D/O DEVI THAKUR. ----------- 2 09.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that out of the wedlock, there is one baby child, but the husband is not taking care of the complainant or the child. It appears that during considering the anticipatory bail before the learned court below, the parents shown ignorance about the husband. In that view of the matter, the petitioners are ready to allow the complainant to reside in the house and enjoy the share of the property of the son of the petitioners without any hindrance. Considering the aforesaid stand, let the above 2 named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 333/2010 Tr. No. 2364/10, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bond of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted and the learned court will monitor, for a period of six months, that the petitioners should comply the undertaking given before this Court, and when the court gets satisfied that the undertaking was substantially complied then the bail bond will be finally accepted. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)