IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1464 of 2011 BETWEEN M. Jamadagni. ... PETITIONER AND The Circle Inspector of Police, Town circle, Ongole, Prakasam District and another. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S. NARENDRANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking directions by way of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the civil rights of the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a permanent resident of Seetharamapuram in Ongole town of Prakasam District and is carrying on the business of Granite Marketing and Trading and by involving him in false cases, the respondents are interfering with his civil rights. In the said background, the petitioner seeks direction to the respondents not to interfere with his civil rights. 3. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home that the petitioner is accused in the following crimes: 1. Cr.No.207 of 2010 under Sections 447, 427 read with 34 IPC; 2. Cr.No.208 of 2010 under Sections 447, 427, 506 read with 34 IPC and 3. Cr.No.188 of 2010 under Section 8 (c) read with 20 (b) of NDPS Act. It is stated that all the cases are pending trial before the Court. Further, it is stated that in view of petitioner’s involvement in the above cases and by watching his unlawful activities, a rowdy sheet was opened against the petitioner, which is in force. 4. Although petitioner claims that his civil rights are interfered with by the respondents, in view of his involvement in the cases aforesaid and also the rowdy sheet against opened against him, there is no basis for the allegations of the petitioner that the respondents are interfering with his civil rights. It is also to be noticed that neither the subject matter of all the said crimes nor the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner is the subject matter of this writ petition. In that view of the matter and in view of submissions made by the learned Government Pleader, I do not find any ground for grant of directions as prayed for. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J February 8, 2011 DSK