1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 517 OF 2008 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 70 OF 2007 Anil Karorimal Agarwal ....Plaintiff. Vs. M/s Shivom ....Defendant. ---- Mr. H.C. Mehta i/b Mehta & Co., for the Plaintiff. Mr. S.J. Khera, for the Defendant. ---- CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C. 1. This is Plaintiff’s Chamber Summons for amending the plaint. According to the Plaintiff there were typographical errors as regards the particulars of the bills referred in paragraph 2 of the plaint. The proposed amendment, no doubt, seek only to correct the alleged typographical errors as regards the date and amounts of the respective bills referred to in paragraph 2. 2. There can be no objection to the amendment on the ground that it changes the cause of action. The proposed amendment does not even seek to introduce a cause of action leave alone change the cause of action. However, Mr. Khera, learned Advocate for the Defendant submitted that the issue of limitation ought to be left open. If these are only typographical 2 errors there would not be any question of limitation, If, however, there is a substitution of the bills as contended by Mr. Khera, then it is clarified that the amendment shall operate from the date of the Chamber Summons and not from the date of the filing of the suit. 3. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is disposed of accordingly.