IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR SATURDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2007 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 3608 of 2007() ------------------------- SUO MOTU REGISTERED AS PER THE ORDER IN CRRP 2499 OF 2007 DATED 30-11-2007 PARTIES 1. SREEKANTAN NAIR, KH/P/TVC, SOUTHERN RAILWAY DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THYCAUD RESIDING AT QUARTER NO.93, RAILWAY QUARTERS, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. 3. D.RADHAMMA, W/O.VIJAYAKUMARAN NAIR, V.R.BHAVAN, MEPPOOKKADA, MALAYINKIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M. NAZAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.3608 of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of December, 2007 ORDER This Crl.M.C. was registered suo motu consequent on the receipt of letter No.C.C.191/02 dated 20.11.07 addressed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram to the Registrar, High Court of Kerala pointing out a mistake in the final order dated 27.6.07 passed by this Court in Crl.R.P No.2499 of 2006. Actually what was intended was that in the event of default in making the payment, the revision petitioner should suffer the sentence imposed on him by the lower Appellate Court. However, due to an inadvertent oversight, instead of stating the lower Appellate Court, in the order it was wrongly stated as “ the trial court”. Hence the last sentence in paragraph 4 of the final order dated 27.6.07 in Crl.R.P.No.2499 of 2007 will stand corrected to read that in the event of default committed by the revision petitioner, the sentence imposed on him by the lower appellate court, shall revive. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj /True Copy/ P.A To Judge Crl.R.P.No. of 2007 2