IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. 23835-M of 2007 Date of Decision:22.02.2008 Ajay Saroha and others .....Petitioner Vs. The State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. B.S.Saroha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for respondent No.2- complainant. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. The prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of FIR No.204 dated 1.8.2006 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Sonepat District Sonepat, Haryana under Sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC and consequent proceedings thereto. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the disputes about the Will of deceased Mukhtiar Singh, the father of petitioner No.1 and complainant stand amicably settled and all the suspicions about the Will stand removed. Reliance has been placed upon a Five Judge Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, 2007(3) Law Herald (P&H) 2225. The facts stated by the petitioner are not disputed by counsel for respondent No.2 in affidavit filed before this Court. The factum of the matter having been compromised between the parties is not disputed. Once the matter has been compromised between the parties, no useful purpose will be served by proceeding with the prosecution. Accordingly, considering the law laid down by this Court in Kulwinder Singh's case (supra), FIR No.204 dated 1.8.2006 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Sonepat District Sonepat, Haryana under Sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC and all proceeding consequent thereto are quashed. The petition is disposed of. February 22, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE