(tau <, wmT PETmGN hie/$2.057 120 Dhani Ram Bhagat aged about 5Q years s/whur Sai rlo Kherkatta Tehsif— Pathaigaon, District—Jashpur (€.G.) VERSUS RESPQNDENTS: - 1‘. State 0f Chhattisgarh Through Department secretaw of revenue ff D,K.S. Bhawan Raipur. (C13) The Cailector Jashpur, Distt— Jashpur (C.G.) The Tehsildar Pathalgaon, Distt—Jashpur (6.6.) . Patwari Haika no, -4 Tehsil, Pathalgaon, Distt.- $ashpur (6.8.) Lanu Uraon slo Mussadi aged about 55years r10 Kherkatta Tehsil— Pathalgacn, Distriet-Jashpur {c.G.) Dhan singh aged about40 years S/o Lall‘u Ram rlo Kherkatta Tehsil— Pathalgaan District— Jashpur (C.G.) Ram Sai aged about 55 years \ Mahinath r/o Kherkatta Tehsil- Patha!gaon District—Jasheur (6.6.) .‘ Somu aged about 23 years s/o Madhur Sai r/o Kherkatta Tehsil- Pathalgg Distric— Jashpu (C. . WRIT PRTITION UNDER ARTICLE 26! 27 OF THE CONSTITUT iNDlA FOR {SSUENCE A WRIT 1N THE NATURE OF MAM 03 " f . “ . . an' t r 4 I E XI-HC~22 §ahu, Advecate. by Miss Shannila Singhai, Deputy Péti‘iionm by Shri Satyendra S Respandants N9. 1, 2 and 3 0vt. Advacate. By thiS writ petition undcr A1 l ndia the petitioner has chalkngai ’ e T€hsiltiar, Pathalgaon iil Mu a. 362,! 1 measun‘llg 0.680 heciar s heal {kleied and the lami has spondentg No. 5 am& 7. It has bean mmationai 1h th 8 are relativas of the pgtitioxmr. ° file §etiti011€r had fxléd a ci sixmdsms N0, 5 and ?’ iii the 37 ha51’a No, 58,!3, 99,!2 am 362 udga pa'sssd. m6 judgmem on 31 d &ec1'e€d the S1111 in fawour of -sharei‘. AgaiESi the judgment Dhai‘amjaigaj‘h for d€c2arati911 hereafter revenue recerd. e I have heard leaned coudasel ticle 226}227 of the Censtimtiefi of he ordei‘ dated V 1 1,_1;;.,J(999 passed by on Case No. 966‘feganiing W, Khaera jg which the game of the petiiiener ezl meansfen‘eauja the earns of the Kaetiticu that the respondents No. 5 e father, graad mailer 6211131 uncle u : 1 suit 4. agaiiist the lather 1‘ L ef the 19271 befele the Civil Judge Class- cf their title 011 the lagd having of Vi11age~Kherkatta Lealneel Civii 3.1972 in/C-ivil Suit No‘ 9~A,I1§?’1 e e father of the petitioner and other ed by the trial Ceurt Civil Appeal {iiemissed vide judgment dt. 24th name of father of the 1G . 1 m a a e o 2 x e 6 L { : “L o p” e h XI—HC-22 mmmm _ z, Walllcu U . x order passai by thii TahSildar ujlder S€ciii011 44 of fhé Chhattii L€an1€d comrsel for the 1 not supplying catiflsd copy psii‘donor is not able to flle appE th€ potitionei‘ drow attention 9976,! 2003 application-for exan ordor dt. 1 1. 1. 1999, and toward iiled. aloag with thiS application. Annsxuro P/S is tho a; potitionfsr in the Court of Tohs which there is a remark dt. 8 W%a%—da?§§ (a / any case relating to the Village trier}. Learried counsel for the p be clirected to supply certified c the petitioner to tile an app learned Deputy Govt. Advocate Having heard learned c the facts and circumstances o Vappmach the Tehsildar afre certified copy of the order dt. 1 is directed to supply certified c Ls appolable boforé', the 83.0, Rovenue ;garh Land Révgnue Coda, 1959. )atitionor submito that tho Tohsildar is 3f the impugned ordor thorofore the a1 before tho S.D.O. ¢L€am€d comisel for of tho Court toxrardo tho I. A. No. ption from filing the certifred copy ofthe S the documents Annexure Pi 5 and Pf 6 plication dated 1.8.2003 tiled by the ddar, Patthalgaon, District- Jashpur in 3.2003 ‘W W or aa% W I” . This remark reveals that neither Kharkhatta is pending nor it was ever titioner submits that the Tehsildar may py of the order dt. 11. 1.1999 to enable before the S.D.O. Revenue for which as no objection. 's el for the parties and having regard to the case the petitioner is allowed to by filing an application demanding .1. P999 and the Tehsildar, Patthalgaon py of the order dt. 1 1. l. 1999 passed by \ ."... 1/” / I s e o X1—HC—22 a&$gwmRH%a him 1'11 Muiatian Cass No. 966 r€ pen‘aai of 15 days from the daté petiiionan Thereafter $16 petitimm bafore t11€ SDI), Ravenua. With tha aba‘m directions th: Paties are €I1tit1€d for csrtifi gamimg Khasra No. 362i 1, within a of iiHng of the appHcation by ths r would ha at liberty to file an appaal’ Ls peiition is fmaéE’yfdiSposed. ed copy of this orc’ler. Sdl- ‘ L.C.BHABOO ' Judge \m