t^^^l^- 0 •9W?3 ^•T.l.tlllOi IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WritPetitionCCINo. ^^l of 2010 PETITIONERS : i. Ramautaar Agrawal, Age - 76. S/o Late Nanhemal Agrawal; 2. Smt. Satyabaala Agrawal, Age ^9. w/o Ramautaar Agrawal / ;-?ft'i »• 9, South Avenue, Chaube Colony, Raipur G}21?^ ^e^ ^ A"' ' ^A\ RESPONDENTS: Versus ^- l. Naya Raipur Development Authority, Thro' its Chief Executive Officer, OfBce at: Near Mantralaya, Mahanadi Gate, Raipur(CG) 2. Collector (Revenue), Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA {^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL^PuR WRITPETm iA'0_Na 3773oi'2010 . PETITIONERS : Ramautaar ^awal & Others. RESPONDENTS : Naya Raipur Development Authority & Otfaers. WRiT PE-ITnON "UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA ri.J. Present: Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.KaclAwaha, Dy. A.G. forthe State/respoadents. (Passed on 06ttl day of October, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that his land was ac.quired way back in tlie year 2007 by the respondent No. 1, but till date, compensation has not been paid to the petitioner and even the same has not beea ascertained till date. The Chief Executive Officer, Naya Raipur Development Authority, Raipur has ^wittento the Collector, Raipur on 29.04.2008 (Annexure P/l). Tlie saine is stili pending consideration and the petitioner has been deprived ofliis land without payment ofcompensation. Shfi Kachhwaha, leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for Ihe State/respondents 1 and 2 submits fhere is dispute witfa regard to nature oftiie laid as accordiag to the respondents, it is a non- irrigated land and according to the petitioner, it is an irrigated laiid. However, the respondent authorities are going to detennine and give compensation to the petitioner as early as possible, havin^ regard to the nature oftiie land. Shri KacUhwatia furfher subntits that the letter dated 29.04.2008 shall be considered and deeided at ihe earliest within a period offour weeks. Iii view of the foregoing, aecording to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nofhing survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordiiigly, the writ petition is disposed of. __._—— Sd/- SatiAK.Ag"'bow| Aimt