Criminal Revision No.792 of 1997 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.792 of 1997 Date of decision: February 27, 2008 Gurinder Singh Dhillon … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. T.S.Sangha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Narinder Singh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General Punjab for the State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Petitioner was posted as SP, Headquarter, Amritsar. Two- fold grievance was made before me by the petitioner. Firstly, cancellation report submitted ought to have been accepted by the Magistrate. Second grievance is that on the same day, there was no occasion for the Magistrate to record the supplementary statement of the complainant. Before I could dwell on the merits of these two submissions, Mr.Sangha, anticipating from the tenor of observations made by this Court, prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition to raise all arguments at the appropriate stage before the court below. However, Mr.Sangha further stated that certain observations made in the summoning order may affect the service prospects of the petitioner, who is holding a very responsible post. Mr.Sangha has further stated that the Criminal Revision No.792 of 1997 2 observations made in the summoning order will have an over-reaching effect. Summoning order is not a final order. Neither it convicts nor acquits the accused. The observations made therein are only for a limited purpose for summoning the accused. It is the final judgment of the Court, which is always to be construed against any person tried of the offences. Nothing more is required to be said. With these observations, present revision petition, as prayed is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to raise all arguments at the appropriate stage, in accordance with provisions of law. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] Judge February 27, 2008. rps