IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 255 of 2002 Gopal Singh Gussain, Son of Sri Dharm Singh, Resident of Village- Devarara Post Office- Tungeshwar, Presently posted as Library Clerk, Government District Library, Chamoli at Gopeshwar. ….Petitioner Vs Sri R.C. Chamola, District Inspector of Schools Chamoli and others. ..Respondents Sri Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri B.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents. Dated: - 17-4-2008 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard. By means of this contempt petition, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondents for flouting the order dated 7.2.2008 passed by this Court in Writ petition No. 752 of 2002 (S/B) Gopal Singh Gussain Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the order of revision has been assailed in the writ petition wherein the interim order was passed by this Court and the same is annexed as annexure No. 3 to the contempt petition and it was directed by this Court that “ Meanw hile, it is provided that since the petitioner is w orking in class III post since 1996, in case there exists any vacancy in class III after the transfer of respondent No.4, the petitioner shall be allow ed to continue.” The grievance of the petitioner is that he is not being paid salary and there is no full compliance of the Court’s order. It is pertinent to mention here that there is no specific order to pay the salary in the interim order passed by this court in writ petition. The contempt Court cannot substitute its own 2 order. The contempt court can only see whether the order has been complied with or not? In compliance of the Court’s order, the petitioner is working in class III post. Learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents made a statement at bar that the order had been complied with. The compliance order has been annexed as annexure No. C.A.1 to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.3 wherein the petitioner has been continued in Class III post. The contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are hereby discharged. However, the petitioner, if, so feel, aggrieved by non- payment of the salary, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum as provided under the law available to the petitioner. All applications stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma,J) M.K. 3