IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11049 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.JOHN, ANSONS GROUP, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, UNION AUTO BUILDING, MUNICIPAL JUNCTION, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHANGANCHERRY. 2. THE CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN, CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).11049/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner who claims to be an Architect, submits that amount is due to him from the 1st respondent Municipality for the work he had executed. According to him, despite requests for payment, amount is not paid. Therefore, representations have been made, the last of which is Ext.P7. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P7 also and therefore the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the pendency of the representation, I feel, at this stage, that the grievance of the petitioner will be redressed if the Municipality considers Ext.P7. Therefore I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs