HIGH COURT OF SHHATTQSGARH AT BELASPUR ‘ DNISEON BENCH CORAM‘. HGN’BLE SHR! RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON’BLE SHRI SUNHL KUMAR SENHA, J. Writ Appea! No.213 of 2009 Anneilant Prahlad Singh, S/o Bhukhu, aged (Pet'itioner) about 4? years, Rio V'iiiage Jagmahant, Past Mahant, Tah & Distt Janjgir - Champa (CG) VERSU$ State of Chhattisgarh, through Department of Transportation, DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Ra%pur (CG) Resaondents 2 Divisiowl Manager, Chhattisgarh infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, Bus Stand, Biiaspur (CG) Presiding Officer, Labour Court, BHaspur (CG) WW Anoeai under $ectlon 2 l1) of the Chhattlsqarh (Apnea! t Dmisron Bench) Act 20% Present : Shri SP Kare, counsel for the appeuant. Shri Arok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for respondent No1. Judqment (5m January, 2mm The foilowing judgmeni of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, Cart. Shri Alok Bakshi, teamed Government Advocate has raised a preiiminary objection about the maintainabiiity of the writ appeal on the ground that the impugned order dated 05.03.2009 was passed by the teamed Single Judge in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Articie 227 of the Constitution of india. o 2) From the contents of the writ petition including the grounds taken for chaiieng ing the order passed by the industriai Caurt in the appeai fiied by respcndent No.2, we have no manner of doubt that the impugned order was passed by’ the iearned Singie Judge in exercise ofjurisdiciion under Article 227 ef the Constitution of indie. 3) i impugned order dated 05.03.2009 passed in WP No.652D/2005, is not maintainabie. 4) not maintainabie. sd/‘ . i z > (y Sunil Kumar Smha Judge The writ appeai, therefore, is dismissed as Sd/- Chief Justice