1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 130 OF 2011 (Surajsingh Gulabsingh Chitodia vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.R. Wagh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 20, 2011. Heard Shri Wagh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yengal, APP for the respondents. The petitioner is owner of fire arm. The said fire arm is a licensed fire arm. The petitioner was asked to deposit said fire arm with the concerned authority on account of election on 17.09.2009. Accordingly, the petitioner deposited the firearm. The grievance of the petitioner is that the elections are long over, however, despite repeated requests the fire arm has not been returned to the petitioner. The learned APP states that the fire arm has been returned to the petitioner on or about 03.04.2011. This fact is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 In this view of the matter, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive, hence the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.