IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3015 of 2011 Dr. Binoy Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3. 08-11-2011 Civil Review No. 174 of 2009 stood dismissed on account of non-compliance of peremptory order at pre notice stage. The petitioner had only to add respondent No. 15 of the writ petition as a party in the Review petition. This ought to have been done within time allowed by peremptory order. However, considering the explanations mentioned in this restoration application, the prayer for restoration is allowed and Civil Review No. 174 of 2009 is restored to its original file on the condition that respondent No. 15 of the writ petition must be added as respondent in the Review application in course of the day, failing which this order shall stand recalled. Mkc/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)