IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 4135 of 2005 Between: 1 M/s. Reddy Wines, Begumpet. Rep. by Mr. K.V. Ramana Reddy S/o. Tirupathi Reddy, aged 40 yrs, R/o. B1-Block, P.No. 38, Mayuri Apartments, Mayuri Marg, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 2 M/s. Knockour wines, Begumpet, Rep. by G. Rama Rao S/o. Rajeswar Rao, aged 48 years, R/o. 1-11-245, Shamlal Buildings, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 3 M/s. Milan wines, Begumpet, Rep. by G. Chalapathi Rao, S/o. Rajesara Rao, aged about 38 years, R/o. 1-10-9/3, Main Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad .... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Proh. & Excise Superintentent Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Proh. & Excise, Government of A.P. at Hyderabad. 4 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue (Excise-II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring G O Ms.No. 184 Revenue (Excise-II) Dept. dt. 7-2-2005 of the Resp. No.4 as illegal, arbitrary unjust and set side the same and issue a consequential direction to the 1st respondent herein to renew the licences of the petitioners forthwith and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.DHANANJAY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner and admitted to by the learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 344, 345, 346 and 347 of 2005 dated 22-3-2005. In the circumstances, following the said judgment this writ petition is disposed of by and in terms of the observations and directions made therein. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 25TH April, 2005 tvk To 1 The Proh. & Excise Superintentent Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Proh. & Excise, Government of A.P. at Hyderabad. 4 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue (Excise-II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 5) 2 CD copies 6) 2 CCs to Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise, High Court of A.P. Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}