IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40075 of 2010 HRIDYA NAND CHAUDHARY . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 02/ 09-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the victim lady in a complaint case lodged in December 2008. It appears from Annexure-2 that in 2009, petitioner filed an application under Section-9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking restitution of conjugal rights. It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he wants to keep his wife with him. As a husband petitioner has special responsibility to keep his wife with dignity and honour. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. In case, petitioner surrenders within ten weeks and satisfies the court below that there has been compromise between him and his wife, in that event, he shall be enlarged on bail on the date of surrender itself 2 in connection with Complaint Case No. 1617/2008 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas/Sasaram. No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner for a period of ten weeks. If cost is deposited, let this order be communicated to the court concerned by fax. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)