.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.355 OF 2008 Rajesh @ Chhotya Shantaram Raut. ..Petitioner. Versus The Deputy Inspector General (Prison). ..Respondents. .. Ms.Smita Gaidhani, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. DATED : MARCH 18, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is praying for furlough. The petitioner had preferred an application for furlough which came to be rejected on the ground that earlier when the petitioner was released on furlough he did not surrender in time. On that occasion the petitioner surrendered 2014 days late. The petitioner had absconded and eventually he had to be .{2}. traced by the police and brought back to prison. We cannot find any fault with the concerned authorities for rejecting the application for furlough. No interference is called for. 3. Writ Petition is rejected. 4. We quantify the fees of appointed Advocate Ms.Smita Gaidhani, at Rs.500/- (Rs.Five Hundred Only). [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]