IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9999 of 2005 UMA SHANKAR PRASAD Son of Late Kalika Prasad resident of Chitragupta Nagar Araria, P.S. and District-Araria. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. District Magistrate, Araria. 3. Deputy Collector,(Establishment)Araria. 4. District Provident Fund Officer, Purnea. 5. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. with MJC No.2266 of 2006 UMA SHANKAR PRASAD Son of Late Kalika Prasad resident of Chitragupta Nagar Araria, P.S. and District-Araria. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR through the District Magistrate Araria, namely Sri Upendra Kr. Roy. 2. Sri Upendra Kumar Roy, District Magistrate, Araria. 3. Sir Janki Sharan, Deputy Collector Land Reforms cum Deputy Collector (Establishment), Araria. 4. Sir Navin Kumar Singh, District Provident Fund Officer, Purnia. 5. Sri Gautam, Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ----------- 3 19.03.2010 Heard Mr. Vinit Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner on instructions of Mr. Uday Bhanu Roy, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned J.C. to S.C. 8 for the State, Mr. Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for the accountant General and Mr. R.K. Singh learned A.C. to S.C.19 for the State in the contempt application. The parties are in agreement that the grievance of the petitioner as set out in the 2 writ petition as also which was subject matter of the contempt application, stands redressed during the pendency of the proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner however, endeavours to dispute the calculation of the provident fund of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, the writ petition as well as the contempt application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to raise his claim before the District Provident Fund Officer, Purnea with appropriate calculative details demonstrating that he is liable for further payment of amount towards G.P.F. dues and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of such representation. As a consequence of the disposal of the writ petition and the contempt petition, the rule if any, issued in the contempt proceeding, stands discharged against the opposite parties. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J.)