IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.10481 of 2011 1. Kamla Chaudhary son of late Kishun Chaudhary, & 2. BirendraChaudhary S/o Kamla Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 26.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that the informant heard two fire shots and suddenly saw his sister-in-law having been injured by the fire arms. He saw the petitioners fleeing away with small guns. The reasons for the occurrence is that previously his brother had been killed in which the petitioner no.1 had been sent to jail and even one year back attempt was made on him and, therefore, he suspected them of having killed. In view of the nature of allegation against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioners at this stage. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, in the background of dispute between the parties and the allegation that they were seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence, they are at liberty to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge if their case is not bifurcated for the purpose of commitment or charge. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)