THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.989 OF 2009 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 BETWEEN: TATINENI GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY . PETITIONER AND T.RAJYA LAKSHMI (MINOR) . RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.989 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 12.6.2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.564 of 2008 in M.C.No.214 of 2004 on the file of Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for Trial of Jubilee Hills Bomb Blast Case cum Addl. Family court, Hyderabad. 2. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 24.6.2009. R1 received the notice and entered appearance through Sri.M.Veera Pratap Reddy. 3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties this revision is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is no relation of husband and wife between the petitioner and the mother of R1 and in which case any order of maintenance granted in M.C.No.214 of 2004 is inexecutable. In support of his submission, he refers to the findings recorded in O.P.No.478 of 1996 on the file of Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for Trial of Jubilee Hills Bomb Blast Case cum Addl. Family court, Hyderabad, wherein the petition filed by Smt.T.Vijaya Lakshmi, mother of R1 herein for restitution of conjugal rights ended in dismissal on 30.10.2006. 6. Learned counsel appearing for R1 submits that thought the marriage of mother of R1 with the petitioner may not be legal but still R1 is entitled to claim maintenance. 7. I am not inclined to adjudicate upon the entitlement of maintenance to R1. It is suffice to say that the order of maintenance granted to R1 is in operation and unless and until it is set aside it continues to be in force. R1 filed Crl.M.P.NO.564 of 2008 seeking recovery of arrears of maintenance pursuant to the order passed in M.C.No.214 of 2004. Learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for Trial of Jubilee Hills Bomb Blast Case cum Addl. Family Court, Hyderabad directed the petitioner herein to pay half of the amount including Rs.10,000/- already paid. When the entitlement of R1 to claim maintenance as per orders in M.C.No.214 of 2004 remains in force, there is no illegality or irregularity in the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.564 of 2008. 8. In view of the above, this revision fails and it is hereby dismissed. 17th September, 2009. ( B.Seshasayana Reddy,J ) tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.989 OF 2009 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2009