HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2113 of 2009 Petitioner R. B. Shanna, son of Deochand Shanna, aged about 64 ysam, Retired Upper Division Teacher, Higher Boys Secondaly School, Bagicha, Post Bagicha, District Jashpur, residence of Girls High School Road Bagicha, Post Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. -Versus- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, th1ough Respondents Secretary, Tribal Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Jashpur, District Chhatu'sgarh. 4. Collector (Tribal We1£are Depaxtment) District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. (Writ Petition under Articles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Apihotri, J. Sbri C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1, 3 and 4. Ms Sharmila Singhai, Advocate for the respondent No. 3. O R D E R (Passed on this 24m day of April, 2009) 1. This case pertains to grievance of non—giant of Ictiral duesipension. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, stigmits that the matter may be referred to the pension committee. 2‘ This Court, :in the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8n others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 .passed in W.P.No.196l[2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh . \\\ and others), and order dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 \x \ \of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and \ \ Thakur @ another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31“ January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642i 2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the ofhce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy‘of this order as well as a copy of the petition hom the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and olticers concerned Within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and .the officers concerned may hie additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petin'oner, be completed within a period of four months n‘om the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel for transferring the same to the Committee. In case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionaxy dues, it is not necessary to hle a writ petition before this Court directly. The representationlapplication can be moved before the Pension Committee, as stated above. The Pension Committee shall not refuse to entertain the representation/application, if so tiled directly. Sd/- l Satish K. Agnihotri; Judge