CWP(T) No. 7830/2008 11.11.2010 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Madhu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for respondents-state According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Tek Chand vs. State of H.P. & Ors., CWP(T) No. 5206 of 2008, decided on 5.3.2010, copy of which is taken on record. I find that facts are almost identical. 2. In reply-affidavit dated 23.8.2001, respondents have made the following submission: “Admitted to the extent of record that the applicant was working as Carpenter Grade-I when he was working on daily waged basis up to 31-3-1998 with the respondent/department and no comments on the academic qualification of the applicant.” 3. Petitioner has been working as a Carpenter Grade-I since 1988. Consequently directions issued in Tek Chand (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to the facts of the instant case also. Consequential benefits, if any, be given from the due date i.e. 1.4.1998. Action be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. It is clarified that amounts due, if any, be also disbursed within the aforesaid period, failing which, thereafter petitioner shall be entitled to interest @9% per annum. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. November 11, 2010 (rana)