IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.309 of 2008 Date of Decision : 24.08.2009 Balbir Singh ...Appellant Versus Dilawar and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Defendant No.1 is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby the suit of the plaintiff-respondents restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff was decreed. The plaintiff has claimed that the stand of the defendants that they are tenant and that the possession is not that of tenant. The present appellant had filed a suit for declaration and preemption claiming possession over the suit property as that of a tenant. The said suit was dismissed and has attained finality with the dismissal of R.S.A. No.4104 of 2007. In view of the findings recorded in the proceedings inter se between the parties in respect of the property in dispute that possession of the appellant is that of a tenant, the findings recorded therein, will not give rise to any substantial question of law. Dismissed. 24.08.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE