N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGA- 9 [W NO W3 ZPJS’‘J . ‘ 93 120 -01 a t Teacher Government Prnnar School Kosamnara ‘ Bloc a1arh D1str1ct—Ra1arh C G ,Rg g ( ) VVS ERVSU " v ESPONDENT ate o atlsgar hrough The Secretary chool Educauon ‘ Departmen K S Bhawan Ralpur (C G he D1strlct Educatwn Of1cer a1a lstrlct Ralgarh (C G ) h Blcok Educatwn Officer, lock Ra1garh Dlstrlct Ralgarh RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLF 226 OF THF‘ ONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN ERTIORARY OR ANY . THER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC I RIL ‘ ‘ AT BILASPUR mt Jyot1 Bala Dewangan o S W/ hrl Hemkant Dewangan, Age bout " 46 years Ass1stan u y,- W ‘ k - S d ' RS St f Chhth a T S t ‘ D ) ' T f r ~ ‘ iRgrh D ‘T o ‘ B , ‘W C ' " 'C , ’ ' O RIT PETITION 5)» NO 41L99I1 , W ( 200 Smt Jyoti Baa ewangan l D arh‘ahdVer gOths . S télréSpondents‘ o dvance copy st Th fd y, tan eacer on a xe pa pd glr erio she was granted reua I d f th ptt bttd tht e Learne counse! appearing or e eiioner sumie a the 1ssu 1nvolved In the case Is as to wheter he pettt ner Is entlte o regular pay scale h t ld t ' rth effect from the ate of rnltral aorntment or ater comleron of probat w d pp f pt ro g w 21.: We, x h dd by th Mdhy Pdh e: The Issue Involved erein was consrere e aa raes Stat Admativ I O A N 2745/8 (MdhktYd d 56: inistr bunal Jabalpur In o 9 auanrau an chers are entrtled to regutar pay scale wrth effect from the dat I appointment The matter wa, tak x appeal was dismissed by the ”o n the Tribunal to the effect h ‘ a egular pay scale from the date hn ;Vmod Tekam Pa S nel { n}, a ORAL DRIER 3 ' a e ' e " r o ’iabve‘ a‘edsubmissions madeVbylIea'rned counsel fo'rt 4. In View ofthéo sttf‘ he :ptie§‘ the Writ petiti9n is disposed of Vin the ’same terms‘ he. the jiétitiOner is g y h h if she stand on th b he Madha Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal Jabalpur in O A No 274 o ukant Yadu supra) and subsequently confrmed by order date 3-01 1994 assed by the Hon‘bie Supreme Court in S L P o an g f dly. rant relie accoring at, ranted tibert to make a represetation if so advised to‘consider er case 1 e same footings as per order dated 24-08 1992 passed y t y 5 f 89 Madh ( d? 0 p N 6892/1993 d, \ o order as o cost N t s. at/— anndra Mohan S Judge # i i - i hrivastava; é® r s Mi ,- i