CWP No.7685/2010 01.07.2011 Present: Mr. R.K. Gautam, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State. M/s T.S. Chauhan & Anil Chauhan, counsel for Pollution Control Board. Mr. Trilok Jamwal, counsel for Electricity Board. This petition was filed by the petitioner-company challenging the action taken by the H.P. State Pollution Control Board directing the H.P. State Electricity Board to disconnect the electricity supply to the industry of the petitioner. During the pendency of the petition, we had directed the restoration of the electricity, on the company filing an affidavit that it would comply with all the norms. Thereafter, a Committee was constituted to take samples of the effluents and the Committee has submitted its report. According to the report of the Committee, all norms are being complied with by the company. In view of the above, petition is disposed of and the company is permitted to function. It is, however, made clear that the H.P. Pollution Control Board shall keep on monitoring the unit. Keeping in view the fact that the unit- company had caused pollution, which had affected the area, in question, it is burdened with costs of `25,000/-, which amount shall be paid to the State Pollution Control Board …2… CWP No.7685/2010 and the Board will use the amount for improving the environment of the Baddi-Barotiwala area. Pending applications also stand disposed of. ( Deepak Gupta ), J July 1, 2011(sd) ( Sanjay Karol ). J.