^ ^^""^•^ ..>''" ^•s .&- wm^E sa,c PETITIONER IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (St N0. T2>63>6 /2010 ' Balbhadra Dhruv S/o Shri Jodhi Dhruv, Aged about 45 years, R/o Village - Jonka, Post - Latwa, Baloda Bazar, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS l.< State of Chhattisgarh, Through :- Secretary, Urban Administration & Development, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Municipality Officer Municipal Council, Baloda Bazar, District - Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITIONER UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATUREOF MANDAMUS.PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^ -_TLe>. —78 .. 3tI^I^Tft5[W ^ITI 3IR?I Wqiq; "SSf -t||A(|c|t|, yT)1y<|(a, fs|^iyy ^~}^o- ~sea£,/^ q>° •W^T 'Wf; (TpFg^q) 'EWIW ^lftrt an^l SBjHon'bieShuManindraMoii datfed 21.07-2010 Shri Sunii Otwani, counsel Ms. Smita Ghai, Panei aavance copy'. Learned counsel for Qovemmenfs policy of regulat regularise as one time msasure of the judgment of the Supreme Karnataka and others v. Uma( case of the petitioner aiong witi( consideration and vide memo datfed the Chief Municipai Officer of reievant proposais for such cdf proposais were fowarded after p4 In the matter had so far been takeh. Taking into consideratton Court, it wouid be approprtate to f| Accordingiy, respondente are ci-airn of the petitioner in accordajice case, grievance ofthe petitioner i^ petitioner to take recourse to suc( theiaw. 'tiwfciiil-i •v^i^ fs^S <r»i^i< ^sffinan^n anShrivastava, J.~ forthe petitioner. 4-awyer for the State/respondent No.'i on thje petitioner submite that in view of it'isation dated 5/3/2008 promuigated to irreguiar appointments, in accordance with (jiourt in the case of Secretary, State of Devi (3) andothers (2006) 4 SCC 1, the other empioyees has been taken up for 11/3/08, Regionai Joint Director required liAunicipai Councii, Baioda Bazar to send hsideraBon pursuant to which necessary [ssing resoiution. However, no final decision keh. phe nature of grievance raised 'oefore this |naily dispose off the petition with directions. dii|ected to take appropriate decision on the with iaw within a reasonable period. in stili not redressed, it wouid be open for the (i remedy as may be avaiiabie to him under Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ;