^ @3 s IN TtE HXGH C00RT OF C.HffiffTXSGARH AT BILASPBR WEUT KTITIOH N0. 13| OF 2006 PETITIOHBR 8 .jaadhaw Prasad SaTaa., Son of late ,.^-^<9''"",....- < "'^w!':\l.\ 3b--" ..l.iU^^'<\-"'' ^•- ^'..'- .&..-•" RESPONDENTS Navagarh, Oistricb : Janjgir - Chaapa ( C* G ) VERSI® 1. State of Chhattisgarh through tbe Secretary, Ministry o£ Bo»s, D.K.S. Bhavaa< Raipur. /'i, The Director Seaeral of Police, Raipur ( C'G ) ^-^ ^^ ^3. The Inspector Genesal of Police, Bilaspur, Bilaspar Range, Bilaspur ( C'S ) ^ 4. The Superintendent of Sblice, Janjgjlr - Champa ( C'S ). miT PETITION 13HDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTXON OF IHDIA. r XI-HC-22 •g3['atPIR'PT, el'al'M'i®.Isl<Ylltf'P -T 031 .^.:.£^°..:..).;3J/QG wwn'wffi^ wi 2<x 3D^iq:I f<-ii?b 3)1^[ ^*1 <i^ i- aii^ryowafef 13-1-2008 .Visbw^karma. 2!8 Stalte ;E|rh einijloyees Petitioner.by Shri D.K.' Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Adyocatt With conseat, heard finaUy. This case relates to compass|i death of aa. einployee serviag ia fhe| Learaed couiisel for fhe peti^io of the einployee has occurTed on earlier, It is further subniitted No. 1322/2002 involving tbe same Court on 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Leamed counsel for fhe states fhat fhe State of Cbhattisj cases of dependants of those strictiy in accordance wifh the poU<jy In view of the subinissions parties, without expressiiig any opiL opinion ofthis Court, ends ofjustjc the State of Chhatdsgarh aad fh^ decide fhe case of fhe petitioner i4 the tune of deafh of fhe eniployee appointinent orders wffl be issued 2006. The petitioner is also authorities. It is inade clear fhat inay avail the reniedy available un<jl before fhis Court. With the aforesaid obseryatiotts Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, order to the rcspoadents for Advocate. ^, for the State/respondeitts. ionate appointment consequent upon the IState. - .^ioner categoricaUy sfated that, fhe deafh i-6-2002 i.e. after 1-11-1997 andnot |fhat in batch • of. cases bearfng W.P. tiuestion. orders have been passed by fhls ^hat similar orders niay be passed iu this coiapli^iice. ^T^'Mlf T7TR?if ^ fe^ <f<ii'^lt ^siPgiisn^r KiV ntade ot)iruon does aot dispute the aboye fact and has takcn a decision to consider ftie who died on or aflter l/ 11/1997 prevalent at that time. by leamed counsel appearing for the on thc incrits of fhe case, ia the :e wffl be served if a direction is given to authorities concemed to consider and accordaace wifh the poUcy prevalentat c|3ncemed. If the petitioner found eligible, early as possible on or before 3Qth April, to render due co-operatipn to the grievaiice stiU reaiains, the petitioner l<jler the law uicludiag filiag of fhe petition dirtcted ifjaay >, this petition staads disposed of. who w3l be obliged to coiiununicate the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (?C^k- / 3' ^y^ [Tit^tR§^f