IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 Tr.P(C).No. 13 of 2008 ------------------------------ OS.132/2005 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD ..................................... PETITIONER ------------------ PREMAKUMARY,D/O.LEELA DEVI AMMA AGED 42 YEARS,RESIDING AT KUNNUMPURATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, CHITTAZHA, PANTHAPLAVU MURI VATTAPPARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.K.KUSUMAM RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. SUKUMARAN NAIR,S/O.KOCHUKRISHNA PILLAI AGED 52 RESIDING AT KADAYIL VEEDU, CHITTAZHA, PANTHAPLAVU MURI, VATTAPPARA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SEETHA, AGED 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT KADAYIL VEEDU,CHITTAZHA, PANTHAPLAVU MURI,VATTAPPARA VILLAGE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== Tr.P.(C) No.13 OF 2008 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of January 2008 JUDGMENT This transfer petition is filed to transfer O.S.No.132 of 2005 pending before the Family Court, Nedumangad to the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram for disposal. A perusal of the transfer petition would reveal that the matrimonial dispute has started as early as in 1994 as O.S.No.369 of 1994 and evidence was also finished from Thiruvananthapuram Family Court. Meanwhile there was formation of Nedumangad Court and therefore the case was transferred to the said court. So, it is very clear that the evidence is over and what is to be done now is to hear the arguments and dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Though the case is renumbered as 2005 it relates back as early as 1994 and therefore the court must be concerned about the case and therefore I direct the Family Court, Nedumangad to give preference to this case, hear the arguments and dispose of the matter within a time frame of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that both Tr.P.(C)13/2008 -:2:- parties should be given opportunity to argue the case. Tr.P.C. is disposed of as above. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-