IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 148 of 2003 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10059 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT PANCHAYAT Versus RAMESHKUMAR CHIMANLAL SHAH -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 148 of 2003 MR HS MUNSHAW for Appellant No. MR KR KOSHTI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 03/09/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) Almost identical Letters Patent Appeal No.309 of 2002 is dismissed today by us by a detailed reasoned order. Except the fact that there is some difference in facts of the case, all other points involved in this appeal are the same. Therefore, for the reasons recorded in Letters Patent Appeal No.309 of 2002, this appeal is also dismissed. (B.J.Shethna, J.) (Ravi R. Tripathi, J.) *Pvv