IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.26143-M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : NOVEMBER 3, 2009 URVINDER SINGH @ SONU TALWAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. KK Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from HC Kewal Krishan of Police Station, City Nawanshahar, states that the petitioner has joined investigation. The documents given by the petitioner have been analysed. No incriminating material could be gathered against the petitioner to, prima facie, formulate an opinion that he is involved in committing offence as reported under FIR No.169 dated 21.10.2008 under Sections 468, 420, 467, 471, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.26143-M of 2009 2 Nawanshahar. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. Order dated 25.9.2009 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions :- i) the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required; ii)the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii)the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. This order shall enure till 10 days after the petitioner receives a notice of filing of final report u/s 173, Cr.P.C, within which period, the petitioner would be at liberty to apply for regular bail. November 3, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?