1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MCA NO. 100/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4406 OF 2008 (Laxmibai Mukundrao Deshmukh & Ors. vs. Durwasgir Hiragir Giri & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 30, 2009. Heard Shri Darda, learned counsel for the petitioners/ applicants and Smt. Khade, learned AGP for respondent No.3. This Court has found that the petitioners have got alternate remedy and therefore writ petition was disposed of. The ground for review is that Sub-Divisional Officer is likely to raise technical objections and it is also argued that the issue stands concluded because of earlier judgments of the High Court. If that is the correct position and orders are shown to Sub-Divisional Officer, I do not find why Sub-Divisional Officer shall raise any technical objection unnecessarily. No case for review is made out. The present MCA is, therefore, disposed of as misconceived. JUDGE *GS.