C482 No.581/04 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Restoration Appln. No.369/2010) Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. for the applicants. Mr. GS Sandhu, GA for the State. The petition has already been decided on merits by this Court on 15.4.2010 and it was not decided for want of prosecution. Hence the restoration application is not maintainable as per law and rules. Even learned counsel for the applicants also unable to show any law or Rules about the maintainability of the restoration application against an order, which has been passed on merits. Resultantly, this restoration application is rejected being misconceived. (D.V., J.) 08.10.2010 Rajeev Dang