criwp1173.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1173 OF 2010 Rohidas s/o Gangadhar Devahare age 42 years, occ service r/o Umbare, TQ. Rahuri Dist. Ahmednagar At prsent Shanit, Tq. Akole Dist. Ahmednagar .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1 Smt. Ranjana Rohidas Devahare age 35 years, occ. Nil. 2 Datta Rohidas Devahare age 17 years, occ. Education minor u/g of his natural mother respondent no. 1. Both r/o c/o Smt. Mathurabai Rambhau Halmukhe at post Dhas Yerandgaon Tq. Shevgaon, Dist. Ahmednagar 3 The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R.B. Dhaware, advocate holding for Mr. U.S. Malte, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, APP for the State. Mr. Y.V. Kakade, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ===== CORAM : A.V. POTDAR, J. DATE : 5 th OCTOBER, 2011 criwp1173.10 2 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1 Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. 2 Heard finally by consent of the parties. 3 This writ petition is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Criminal Revision no. 231/2006 which came to be dismissed on 29-11-2010 by which the order passed in Criminal Misc. Application no. 8/2002 filed by respondent before the JMFC, Shevgaon, under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was allowed by judgment and order dated 30-11-2006 thereby awarding maintenance in favour of respondents at the rate of Rs. 1,500/- and Rs.800/- per month. 4 It appears that after this writ petition was filed the parties have arrived at compromise and accordingly filed compromise pursis dated 16-9-2011 before this court duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel. Parties are also present before the Court who are identified by respective counsel. It is agreed between the parties that the petitioner has paid criwp1173.10 3 Rs.1,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of maintenance to the respondents which, the respondents have received and waive future right to claim maintenance from the petitioner. The marriage tie between the petitioner and respondent no. 1 was also dissolved and they request that the judgment impugned be quashed and set aside. Parties who are present before the Court state that they have voluntarily compromised the dispute outside the Court and now there is no grievance in respect of maintenance. Compromise pursis dated 16-9-2011 is marked as ‘X’ for identification. 5 In view of the compromise pursis to which the parties have voluntarily agreed, the judgment impugned in Criminal Revision Application no. 231/2006 dated 29-11-2010 is hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Writ petition stands disposed of. ( A.V. POTDAR ) JUDGE dyb