IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.267 of 2010 Dr. Birendra Narain Chaubey, son of Late Pandit Gariba, Nand Shastri, Resident of Village- Diliyan, P.O. Koath, P.S. Dawath, District-Rohtas, at present Medical Officer, Sadar Hospital, Buxar. ………………………..Petitioer. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 22. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. K. N. Chaubey learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anirudh Mishra, learned counsel for the informant as also Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that informant had sustained some injury during certain other occurrence. Whereafter, he was admitted at Sub Divisional Hospital Buxar, for his treatment. The petitioner is said to have prepared his injury report. According to the informant, subsequently, there was some interpolation in the aforesaid injury report. The petitioner has denied the entire prosecution case. Learned counsel for the Complainant has opposed the prayer tooth and nail but has conceded that the petitioner is still in Government service. Be that as it may, the petitioner, namely, Dr. Birendra Narain Chaubey, , in the event of his arrest/surrender shall be enlarged on bail within a period of four weeks from 2 today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2009 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. and with a further conditions (a) that one of the bailors must be Government Servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (c) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)