1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPP) No. 1226 of 2010 in Criminal Application No. 1891 of 2010 (D) Smt. Ramkali Mohan Beniwal ..VERSUS.. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S., Frezarpura, Amravati. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. C.V.Navlani, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. P.V.Bhoyar, A.P.P. for Respondent / State. CORAM : Prasanna B. Varale, J. DATED : 22 nd Decem ber , 2010 . Heard. This is an application for speaking to minutes in respect of the order dated 16/12/2010 passed by this Court in Criminal Application No. 1891/2010, thereby granting bail to the applicant. Learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that while granting regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., by mistake it is mentioned in first paragraph as “under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for pre-arrest bail to her as she is apprehending arrest”, whereas the applicant is already in custody, due to which the learned Sessions Judge, Amravati is unable to comply with the orders of this Court. Perused the application. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed. The sentence “under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for pre-arrest bail to her as she is apprehending arrest as she is apprehending arrest” as appeared in the order dated 16/12/2010 in Criminal Application No. 1891/2010 be read as 2 “under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail”. The rest order and the terms and conditions of bail shall remain as they are. The application is disposed of. Hamdast permitted. JUDGE Diwale