^ivssjors {5'ss 39 £2 l^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRJT_APPEAL No.^5'^ _QFSee9.5e^O (Arising out of order dated 23/11/09 passed by the Hon'ble Justice Shri Dhirendra Mishra in WP (C) No. 3973 of 2009) APPELLANT CpsV\^\6'\ey) Vipra Arts, Commerce & Physical Education College, through-PrincipaJ, Near Pt. R.S. University, Doraar Talab, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ./^.. /, '5' ,° .••'\7 V •' - ^ -N .••' Fr'' ^ ^•'^ P ^^'7 <?•• s"' /: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, School Education, D.K.S Bhavaa, Raipur (C.G.) ^"2. The Registrar, Pt. Ravi Shankar University, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Affiliating University) ^-3. The Director, Westem Regional Committee, Nationa! Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E) Manas Bhavan, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (M.P.) •/4. Member Secretary cum Appellate Authority, National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) Hans Bhavan, near Tilak Bridge, Bahadur Shah Jafar Marg, New Delhi. /5. The Director, State Council1 fbr Educational Research and Training, (S.C.E.R.T.), Shankar Nagar, Raipur . (C.G.) - ^ WRIT APPEAL UNDERSECTION.2(1) OETHE CHHAmSGARH HIGH COURT (APPEALTO THE DIVISION BENCH) ACT 2006 ^ n^ HIGH COURT OT CHHAniSSARH AT BUASPUR DIVISION BBICH: HON'BLE SlflU LM.CKJDDUS & HCT*'BLE SHR1 H.K.KEWMWL.JJ. VmiT APPEAL N0.220010 APPELLANT Vs RESPONDEWTS Vipra Arts, Corrmeree & Physical Educatipn . Coltege ^te (rf ChhEtfttegaih & 5 others Present Mr. P.S. Koshy, Advocate ft»rthe appetert. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Oy. A.G. tw tha Stato. ORALJUDGMENT . > , (Passed on 06" July, 2010) I.M. Quddusl. J; 1. Heard on I.A. No.1^ applicatkm for condonatton of delay in filmg tfie writ appeal. 2. For the reasons assigned inthe appljcation for condonatjon of dehay, we are of the opinion that ttie appedant has sati^E(ctorUy exptained the detey and accordingly, the applfcation is altowed and delay is condoned. 3. The writ appellant has fited this writ anaeal against the impugned order datBd 23.11.2009 ptesed by the teamed Sjngte Judge in W.P. (c) No.3973Q009 dismissmg the wrtt petition. 4. Since the niatter relates to recpgnition of B£d. course for tho.Madenric sessron M09-10, we are ncrt indined to IntBrfere at this stage as the writ appeal has become inftuctuow due to end of tt» sesston 2009-10. Howevsr, thfe will not debar the writ aCT»llantfrom mqviro (resh ap^afion for grant of pecogniUon for the current session and if such anrifeaBon is moved by the writ swellart, fte same shall be processed and deckted by fte competent authorily concemed in accordance ynth law without beir^ influenced by the jm|»ignedorder dated 23.11.M09 passed by the teamed Single Judge or <he order |»»edin this wrtt appeal. It is furtter made degr thirt rejectton of the appUcation (iw; grant of recognifion for the sreapn 2009- 10 shall not be treated as disqualification. 5: Tl)p impugned order dated 23.11.2009 passed by fts teamedSingte Judg& in W.P. (c) ^to.3973rt)9 is modified to th6 above extent. 6. The writ appeal is disposed accordjngty. No order as to costs. ^ Roshan/- Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge \ S3^»'