IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Criminal Misc. No. M-7606 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2008 Sushil Singh Bisht .....Petitioner Vs. Seema .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Mohinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** RAJESH BINDAL J. The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the Court below wherein in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C, interim maintenance of Rs. 1,500/- per month has been fixed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class vide order dated 6.6.2007 which was upheld in revision by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh vide order dated 28.1.2008. Though the claim of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is working as a labourer and earning Rs. 80 per day but there was no material evidence on record to prove that. In the absence thereof, a very meager sum of Rs. 1,500/- per month was fixed as interim maintenance. In view of the above facts, I do not find any justification to interfere in the impugned orders. Dismissed. March 25, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE