1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.252/2008 Rama Kishan Sangwa vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 21.1.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Anand Purohit, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner adverse orders were passed against the petitioner on 7th June, 2003 which had two effect, one removal of petitioner from service and another for recovery of certain amount. The petitioner, therefore, challenged the said order Annex.1 by preferring revision petition, which was allowed vide order dated 13.8.2003 by the Hon'ble Minister and the petitioner was reinstated in service. However, so far as monitory liability is concerned, for that, the appeal of the petitioner is pending. According to learned counsel for the petitioner even during the pendency of the appeal for the same amount, new notice was issued by the Asstt. Registrar, Cooperative Society, Nagaur and ultimately, an order was passed on 29th Nov., 2007 by which the concerned authority recommended the action against the petitioner under Sections 21(1), 32(17), 33(b) and 25(b) as well as 2 also directed to take action against the petitioner departmentally as well as on the allegation of embezzlement etc. For this even FIR may be lodged. According to learned counsel for the petitioner,when matter is pending before the appellate authority then the Asstt. Registrar, Cooperative Society had no jurisdiction to pass the order. Since the subject matter is the same, which is pending before the appellate authority and appropriate relief can be obtained from the appellate authority by the petitioner, therefore,this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. For any interim relief also, the petitioner may approach the appellate authority by moving appropriate application and the same may be considered by the appellate authority strictly in accordance with law. With this indulgence only that petitioner may approach the appellate authority, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. The Hon'ble Minister is expected to pass appropriate order so that the petitioner may avail any remedy if the order goes against the petitioner. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.Goyal/-