1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5100 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.5100 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.5100 OF 2005 Sanjiv R.Chimbulkar ...Petitioner Versus Maharashtra State Financial Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents Shri Vishwanath Talkute for the petitioner. Shri M.P.Rege for respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2006. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2006. DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2006. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Talkute learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Rege learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 - Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC). 2. In my view, the objection to the territorial jurisdiction of the District Court at Thane, is a issue which can be raised by the petitioner in case he is aggrieved by the final 2 order passed by the District Court in proceedings under Section 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. Admittedly, the final order is an appealable order. Therefore, all such contentions, as are raised in the Petition, can be raised in case the final order is adverse to the petitioner. It is not necessary to interfere at this interlocutory stage and in my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)