IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2375 of 2004() ------------------------------ CRA.228/2002 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, THODUPUZHA CC.753/1998 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, PEERUMEDU .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT --------------------------------------------------------- BABU, S/O.MATHEW, KOCHUPURACKAL, MEPPUZHA BHAGAM, MUKKUDOM KARA, KOKKAYAR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------- STATE-S.H.O. PERUVANTHANAM, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P. No.2375 of 2004 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated, this the 13th day of March, 2009. ORDER Revision Petitioner stands concurrently convicted for an offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C. He was the accused in C.C.No.753/1998 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Peermade. 2. Pending this revision, the de facto complainant/injured as well as the revision petitioner have compounded the offence and have filed Crl. M.A. 2483 of 2009 under Sec. 320 Cr.P.C., seeking leave to compound the offence and to record the composition. 3. The permission sought for is granted and the composition is recorded. This will have the effect of acquittal of the revision petitioners of the offence punishable under Sec. 420 I.P.C. within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 13th day of March, , 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj ani.