W.P. (227) NO. PETITIONER / VERSUS RE5P0NDENT$ / x 1. p a€€f§ dduyw 2. Ax/ / f 3%§£$§.E§E§%€% / & i) C QFtcs7 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 7 96‘2/ of 201 Ar'vind Shrivas’rava son of a’re Ambika Pmsad, aged about 62 years, SmT. Urmila shrivasmvu, wife of Arvind ShrivasTava, age abou 60 year‘s, BoTh R/o QuarTer No. IG‘371, JanTo Colony, Pudumnobhpur, Durg, Disfr‘ic’r Durg (6.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / Romesh Chandra Ver‘ma, son of late Bhara‘r Chandra Lal Verma, aged 55 years, Occupafion Lec‘rurer, Tribal Welfare Deparlmen‘r, Ranandgaon, R/o. M—Zl, Lalbag Housing Board Colony, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 0 l d T L OF THE TTISGARH j I I r § 1 l I I J J { ‘ r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (227) No. 7602/2010 , PETITIONER : Ramesli Chandra Verma Versus RESPONDENTS : Arvind Shrivastava and another Apgearance: Shri Atul Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (22. 12.20 10) Petitioncr is heard on admission. (2) The only prayer made in this writ petition is for a direction to the learned trial court to decide the petitioner’s application under section 13 (6) of the C.G. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 and further to decide the suit within three months. (3) From the document annexed with the writ petition it would appear that the 4la1nt1ffs suit for eviction tiled against the respondent/defendant is pending since August 2009 and in view of the failure ofthe defendant to deposit rent in accordance with section 13 (6) of Act, I961, he has moved an application under section 13 (6) of the Act which remains undecided and there is no material progres in the suit. (4) In view ofthe above and on perusal ofthe order sheet recorded ’by the trial court (Annexure P-S), this court deems it tit to direct the r s way“ x trial court to take up’the application under section 13 (6) of the Act, 1961 and make endeavor to decide the same within a period of three months oom the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. (5) Learned trial court should also make endeavor to dispose of the suit as early a§ possible. (6) With this direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed. Sdl- ‘ f ;i11 .i f Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge