IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8657 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 12, 2010. Smt.Santosh Kumari .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner while working as a Clerk in the office of the District Education Officer (Primary), Kapurthala, remained under suspension from 22.10.1991 to 26.11.1991. Later on, she was exonerated from the charges and the departmental proceedings were dropped. But her suspension period has not been allegedly regularized despite various representations followed by a legal notice dated 8.1.2010 (Annexure P-4), served on her behalf. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.2 to take an appropriate decision regarding regularization of the suspension C.W.P.No .8657 of 2010 2 period of the petitioner, as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 12, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE