IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25955 of 2011 1.Bishwa Nath Mishra, Son of Late Nageshwar Mishra. 2.Rajeev Kumar Mishra @ Kanhai Mishra. 3.Sanjeev Kumar Mishra @ Gopal Mishra @ Sanjeev Mishra. 4.Bimal Mishra @ Vimal Kumar Mishra. Petitioner nos. 2 to 4 are Sons of Bishwa Nath Mishra. 5.Mahakant Mishra, Son of Late Rajendra Mishra. All resident of village Anandpur, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar. -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 26/08/2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest, in connection with Protest being C.R. No. 133 of 2008, arising out of Tajpur P.S. Case No. 59 of 2004 for the offences punishable under Sections 363/365/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph no. 1 and in the prayer portion of the application regarding number of case etc. All the five petitioners are named accused in this protest complaint arising out of Tajpur P.S. Case No. 59 of 2004 with allegation of kidnapping of minor daughter of the complainant. Submission is that due to land dispute a false case was lodged and police after thorough investigation finding the case false, submitted final form and protest complaint petition was filed after 2 prolonged enquiry, cognizance has been taken. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Protest being C.R. No. 133 of 2008, arising out of Tajpur P.S. Case No. 59 of 2004, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for three years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)