Cr.MP(M). No. 2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent. Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. List on 27th August, 2010. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) Cr.MP(M). No.921 of 2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr.T. S.Chauhan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent. Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. List on 20th August, 2010. The petitioner shall not be arrested till the next date. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) Cr.MP(M). No. 413/2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr.Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also learned Additional Advocate General. The order dated 14th May, 2010 is confirmed. The petitioner shall be bound by all the conditions as contained therein. The petitioner shall apply fresh for bail when the challan is put up in Court. The petitioner shall not abscond from the jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge,Mandi. The petition is disposed of. Photo copy of order dated 1.5.2010 passed by Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Mandi in Cr.MP. No. 143 of 2010 in bail petition filed by the other co-accused Prakash Chand, who has since been released on bail by the learned trial Court, is taken on the record of the case. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) Cr.MP(M). No. 869 of 2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr.Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent. Heard. Order dated 12th August, 2010 is confirmed with the condition that the petitioner shall apply fresh for bail when the challan is filed in Court. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) Cr. Rev. No. 28/2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr.Ajay Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for the respondent. Certified copy of the trial court judgment be filed within a period four weeks from today. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) CMPMO. No. 264/2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Rajiv Sood, Advocate for respondent No.2. CMPMO. No. 264 of 2010. Admit. CMP. No. 733 of 2010, No orders at this stage save and except that the impleadment of the petitioner in the suit will be subject to determination as to whether the petitioner is necessary party to the suit. Learned counsel submits that despite the impleadment, no chance to file written statement has been granted. A direction is issued to the learned trial Court that the petitioner be granted an opportunity to file written statement in accordance with law. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) CMPMO. No. 479/2009. 19.8.2010. Present: Ms. Ambika Kotwal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the Respondent. CMP. No. 830/2010. Heard. Photo copy of the order withdrawing the complaint by the respondent before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Amb, recording that the complaint stands withdrawn on 29th April, 2010 and the statement of the respondent of the same date have been filed on the record of the case. Prayer made on behalf of the respondent that the amount awarded to her in lieu of the full and final settlement arrived at between the parties be released, which prayer is not opposed. Accordingly, it is directed that a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- be released to the applicant-Reeta Kumari and the amount be remitted in her Bank Account as given in this application. A further direction is issued that the remaining amount of Rs.6,00,000/- be invested in Fixed Deposit in equal share i.e. 3,00,000/- each in the names of the two minor daughters, namely, Meena and Richa. This amount shall not be released to anyone except by prior permission of this Court. The application is disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) Cr.MP(M). No. 884/2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr. K.B.Khajuria, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for Respondent-State. This court has been informed that the investigation is practically complete and that the challan will be filed in the trial Court. The petitioner is in judicial custody. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads that no offence is made out against the petitioner as he has married to the prosecutrix. This court has also been informed that five other co-accused have already been released on bail by the learned trial Court. In these circumstances, a direction is issued to the learned trial Court that the petitioner shall be released from the judicial custody on the following conditions that: (a) The petitioner shall not interfere or tamper with the prosecution evidence or in any manner try to overawe or influence the prosecution witnesses; (b) The petitioner shall not obstruct the smooth progress of the investigation; (c) He shall not abscond from the jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge ,Chamba; (d) The petitioner shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Chamba. (e) It is clarified that in the event of violation of any of the conditions imposed, the petitioner shall be taken into custody forthwith without reference to this Court. A further direction is issued that the petitioner shall attend the trial on each and every hearing except when exempted by the Court in accordance with law. It will be open to the prosecution to apply for imposition of any other or further condition if it deems necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Dev Darshan Sud), J. August 19, 2010(R) CWP. No. 2440/2009. with CWP. No. 3901 of 2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for Respondents. At the request of made on behalf of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Principal Kendria Vidhyala, Shimla is impleaded as party respondent. Let notice of this petition be issued to the newly added respondent for the limited purpose to ascertain as to whether the petitioner has been granted detailed marks sheet of 8th Standard examination. List on 27th August, 2010. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) CWP. No. 3901 of 2010. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General for Respondents. List along with CWP. No. 2440 of 2009 on 27th August, 2010. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R) CWP. No. 188 of 2009. 19.8.2010. Present: Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Addl. Advocate General For respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.5. It is not disputed before me that the controversy is squarely covered by the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP.No. 1096 of 2010 decided on 17th May, 2010 titled Raksha Devi and others Vs. State of H.P. and others. This petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the judgment aforesaid. The case is sent to the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi for decision in accordance with law and in terms of the directions issued in the judgment. The petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. August 19, 2010(R)