1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 5759/2000 (Jairam Vithu Urkude VERSUS Manohar Vithobaji Haradave & 15 others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Shri Dhore, counsel for the appellant. Shri Khajanchi, counsel for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JULY 9, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This Court had, by an order dated 26.09.2007, allowed the application for condonation of delay of 2 Years and 280 days in filing the appeal only on the condition that the appellant pays costs of Rs.10,000/- to the respondents within a period of 2 weeks from the date of the order. Though a period of more than nine months has lapsed after the passing of the order dated 26.09.2007, the appellant has not paid the costs of Rs.10,000/- to the respondents. The counsel for the appellant makes a statement that though several communications were issued to the appellant asking the appellant to pay the costs, the appellant has not responded to those communications and has not contacted the counsel for the appellant. 2 In this view of the matter, the order passed by this Court on 26.09.2007, so far as it allows the application of the appellant, is revoked. The civil application stands dismissed. JUDGE APTE