IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 5TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 29614 of 2010(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M.P.PRASAD, `PADMAPRASADAM', KALAPPETTY, KUZHALMANNAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SMT.A.R. PRAVITHA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE TAHSILDAR, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD-678 701. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUZHALMANNAM, PALAKKAD-678 702. 3. RAGHAVANKUTTY @ RAGHAVAN UNNI, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, MANNADIAR, SANTHOSH NAGAR, PIRAYARI P.O., PALAKKAD-678 004. 4. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.BALASUBRAMANIAN NAMBEESAN, PUZHPAKATH, KALAPPETTY, PALAKKAD-678 702. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.29614 of 2010 (B) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T What is sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P8 objection filed by him against Ext.P7 application. 2. According to the petitioner, Ext.P7 application was filed by the 4th respondent for mutation of 3 acres 49 cents of land comprised in survey No.130/A/2 of Kuzhalmannam 2 Village, over which the 4th respondent has no right. It is stated that pointing out the above, Ext.P8 objection has been filed by the petitioner. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, raising the aforesaid contention he has filed Ext.P8 and orders on Ext.P7 has not been passed so far, there is no reason why Ext.P8 objection shall not be considered as and when Ext.P7 is taken up for consideration. 4. In that view of the matter, without expressing anything on merits, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent, before whom Ext.P8 objection is filed, to forward Ext.P8 WP(C) No.29614/2010 -2- to the 1st respondent, who shall consider Ext.P8 also as and when Ext.P7 application of the 4th respondent is taken up for consideration. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before respondents 1 & 2 for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg