1 cas737 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.737 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.32 OF 2011 Mamal Tulsiram Jagtap & Anr. ...Applicants vs. Rukmini Parasaram Suryavanshi and ors. ...Respondents Mr.Amit Parkar for the applicants Mr.V.B.Rajure for respondent no.2 Mr.V.V.Yadav for the respondent no.3 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned counsel for the third respondent. Affidavit of service of notice of first respondent is taken on record which contains acknowledgment signed by the first respondent. The second appeal is admitted for final hearing. 2 The applicants are the original plaintiffs. Though the suit is partly decreed by granting a permanent injunction, the claim for exercising the right of pre-emtion under section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act,1956 has been rejected. In the circumstances, a limited interim relief prayed for as against the respondent nos.1 and 2 deserves to be granted. 2 cas737 3 Hence, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE