'5r xv ‘EJm K 7:, H§GH CGURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILA$PUR WP. (C) No, 182 of 2007 iHE‘ Petitiane.’ Praveen Deevan. Aged 35 years. 6/0 Goverdhan Deewan, R/o Viliage Tumgacn, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thr. $ecretary, Respondents Gavemment of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat & Ruyai Beveiopment Department. D. K. 5. Bhawan‘ Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Direator, Directorate of Panchayat, Chhattisgam‘ Raipw (C.G.) 3. The Coiiector, District Mahasamund (CG) 4. Sub Divisional OEiicer (Revenue) & Prescr§bed Officer, Mahasamund (C6,) 5. Chief Executive Officgr. Janpad Panchayat. Mahasamund (C.G.) 6. Smt. Annapurna Sahu, Aged about 39 yeas, Wig Tut—swam sahu, Rm, Post Tumgaon‘ Tahsil & Mahasamund (C.G.) 7. Dharénendra Kumar Dh'war. Sic Koduram Panch — Vinage Panchayat Tumgaon. Tahsii & District Mghasamund {65.} .. WRIT PETITIGN UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE (:ONSTWUTIGN 6F #NDIA 5B: Hcn’b'le ML Justice satish K. Agnihatri $hn' P. S. Koshy, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Pane! Lawye: far the :espendeme No. 1 to 4. $hri Mano} Paranipe. Advacate fcf the respcndent No.6. (\ , Shri S. C. Vefma, Advocate fer the respendent No.7. O R D E R ( Passed on this 10‘" day 0f May, 2007} 1. Learned counse! appearing for the respondent No.6 and ieamed counsel appearing for the respondent No.7 submit that the grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order dated 23.12.2006 (Annexure P/1) was passed by the Director. Pancheyat. Chhattisgarh in Case No. Thakur 7 @ 97!A-89l05-06 (Dharmenrm Dhivar Vs. Annapurna Sahu & others). without af¥crding an oppoftunity of hearing to the petitioner. That order may be quashed and the matter may be remanded back to the Difector‘ Panchayat for considering therapproprrate applicationlrevision afresh‘ after grving an opportunity of hearrng to aH the concerned parties, I rncluding the eetrtiener. I)» Learned ceunser apoeering fer the petitioner submits that in View of the submissions made by learned counsel apoearing for the respondents No. 6 ano‘ 7. nothing sunritres in this matter. in View of the above the order dated 23.12.2006 (Annexure Pit) is, ()a quashed and the matter is remanded back to the Director‘ Panchayat for hearing the appropriate application/revision afresh, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to at! the concerned parties and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. \ 4. in View of the foregoing. this petition is aiiowed. No order as to costs. i Sd/— ‘ Satish K.Agnihotri i Judge i