..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2058 OF 2008 Ashok Gena Sarvade. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.E.A.Sasi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 1st October, 2008. DATED : 1st October, 2008. DATED : 1st October, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The prayer of the petitioner is that R.C.C.No.122 of 2005 and Sessions Case No.260 of 2005 be tried together. Regular Criminal Case No.122 of 2005 arises out of C.R. No.116 of 2007 and it is pending before the J.M.F.C., Mohol. Sessions Case No.260 of 2005 arises out of C.R. No.114 of 2005 of Mohol police station and it is pending before the Sessions Court at Solapur. On perusal of the FIR in both the cases, it is seen that the incident and the complainant in both the cases are different. One ..(2).. incident has taken place at 6 p.m. and the second incident has taken place at 8:30 p.m.. The accused persons in both the cases, as is seen from the FIR, are different. The injured persons in both the cases are also different. Though the incident has taken place on the same road, looking to the facts of this case it cannot be said that both the incidents are part of the same transaction. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioner has placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Balbir vs. State of Haryana and Balbir vs. State of Haryana and Balbir vs. State of Haryana and another another another reported in 1999 AIR SCW 4124 1999 AIR SCW 4124 1999 AIR SCW 4124. In the decision on which reliance is placed, the case was of murder and both the cases pertained to same case of murder. In the present case, the facts are quite different. Looking to the fact that the complainants and injured persons and accused persons in both cases are different and both the incidents have occurred at different times, no case is made out for trying both the cases jointly. Writ Petition is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)