1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.471 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1193 OF 2010 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO.472 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1194 OF 2010 Gorakhnath Tukaram Shedge .. Appellant. Vs. Smt.Muktabai Bhimaji Shedge & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the appellant. None for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 21/09/2010. PC: 1. These two appeals are arising from separate judgments passed in regular civil appeal nos.17 of 2003 and 49 of 2007. By these judgments the appellate court has confirmed the judgments and orders passed by the trial Court in regular civil suit nos.308 of 1996 and 309 of 1996. The parties and the issues involved in these appeals are similar. Only the lands and the registered mortgage deeds dated 22.2.1979 and 26.5.1980 are different. Hence both the appeals are disposed of by this order. The question that falls for consideration is whether the court below was right in interpreting S 2 the document as mortgage deeds. According to the plaintiff, both the documents were mortgaged deeds whereas according to the defendant/appellants they were absolute sale with condition to repurchase the land. Mr.Bandiwadekar, learned counsel for the appellant at the outset submitted that if both the documents are read in entirety they would clearly show that it was sale transaction and not mortgage as claimed by the plaintiff. Mr.Bandiwadekar submitted that that it was sale transaction only on the basis of the consideration. As a matter of fact the consideration shown in the documents itself supports the case of the respondents-plaintiffs that it was mortgage. I have perused the documents so also the interpretation made by the courts below of the documents in the judgments impugned in both the appeals. The court below, in my opinion, has considered the documents in proper perspective and have rightly held that they are mortgage deeds and decreed the suits for redemption of mortgage. I do not find any reason to disturb the findings of fact. No substantial question of law is either raised or involved in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed. Consequently, the civil applications are also disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)