IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 15701 of 2008 Between: K. Jangaiah S/o. Lingaiah R/o. 21-2-520, Ghansi Bazar, Hydeabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Secretary, Regional Transpot Authority, South Zone, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the notice issued in vide proceedings in R.No. 3212/HS/2008 dt. 14-7-2008 and quash the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) Seeking a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the notice in R. No. 3212/HS/2008 dated 14.7.2008 issued by the respondent, whereby the petitioner was called upon to pay a tax of Rs.73,400/- for release of his road roller bearing Registration No.ABM-8210, in terms of the directions issued by this court in WP No. 14435 of 2008 dated 8.7.2008 and consequently, to quash the impugned notice, the present writ petition is filed. Previously, the petitioner filed W.P. No. 14435 of 2008, which was disposed of by this court on the condition of the petitioner paying the tax amount due as assessed by the Officer after deducting the amount, if any, paid, by order dated 8.7.2008. In compliance of the said order, the respondent, has served the notice impugned in this writ petition calling the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.73,400/- towards the tax due. The grievance of the petitioner is that neither any breakup figures are furnished in the demand notice for raising such a huge demand of Rs.73,400/- nor any notice was given to the petitioner before passing the impugned order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport. Having regard to these facts, we dispose of the writ petition leaving it open to the petitioner to make appropriate representation to the respondent to furnish breakup figures in calling upon him to pay a sum of Rs.73,400/-. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ________________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan July 24, 2008 MAS ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}