WP(C) 4/2004 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA . By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a directio n to the respondents to allow her to continue in service as Anganwadi Worker in the centre called Barbakra Lahkarpara Anganwadi Centre. She has also prayed for setting aside and quashing of the order dated 17.12.2003 passed by the Child Dev elopment Project Officer, Hajo laying down certain conditions of appointment and to allow her to continue in the post of Anganwadi Worker. It is the case of the petitioner that since she was appointed as Anganwadi Worker against a particula r post, the same very post could not have been put to advertisement once again. The petitioner apprehends termination of her service. In the counter affidavit filed by the Respondent No.3, it has been state d that the petitioner was appointed as Anganwadi Worker without any selection pr ocess and thus, there is no impediment in issuing the advertisement for filling up the post of Anganwadi Worker. It has been stated that the selection process i s complete and the Select List has also been prepared. The petitioner has not filed any affidavit-in-reply denying the stand of the Respondent No.3 that she was appointed without following any due procedure of selection. None appears for the petitioner. Ms R. Chakraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Go vt. Advocate, Assam submits, in reference to the counter affidavit filed by the Respondent No.3, that the petitioner having not been appointed through the selec tion process, the Respondent No.3 rightly issued the impugned order. Considering the matter in its entirety, I do not find any infirmity in t he Annexure-IV impugned order dated 17.12.2003. Accordingly, the writ petition i s dismissed and the interim order dated 27.1.2004 stands vacated.