IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48825 of 2008 SHYAM SUNDER VISHWAKARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner:Mr.Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ----------- 2. 19.12.2008 Heard. The petitioner prays for grant of bail in a case instituted under sections 328,379 and 411 IPC. As per the allegation in the FIR, the petitioner is said to have offered some edibles to the informant, as a result whereof he became unconscious . Counsel for the petitioner, referring to the FIR as well as the statement of the informant made under section 164 Cr.P.C., submits that there is apparent contradiction. He further submits that the informant has admitted in the statement u/s 164 that he got back all his belongings . It is also highlighted that the medical examination report does not disclose administration of any intoxicated medicine/articles. The petitioner is said to be in custody since 19.4.2007. Having regard to the fact that the alleged stolen articles has been restored to the informant and also keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is in custody for a pretty long time, this Court is persuaded to grant bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 8000/-(eight thousand) with two sureties of the - 2 - like amount each to the satisfaction Addl.District and Sessions judge, FTC IV, Gaya in Rail p.s.case no.65/07/Sessions Trial no.79/07/637/07 on the condition that one of the bailors should be close/own family member. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )