IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24391 of 2010 NARSINGH SADA, S/o Late Kaleshwar Sada. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently some witnesses stated that the petitioner along with co- accused person were talking about theft to be committed of Bolero Jeep. However, there has been no recovery from his possession and there is only one other case pending against the petitioner which fact will be verified by the Magistrate concerned. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 09.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jeewan Lal, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea (or his successor) in connection with Sadar Dagarua P.S. Case No. 372 of 2009 (G.R. No. 2604 of 2009) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will 2 give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother/brother of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner’s family has no property so the Magistrate concerned will consider the viability of the releasing petitioner on PR Bond as surety of his family members mentioned above after due verification of their identity. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)