1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.WRIT PETITION NO.626 OF 2008 (GOVIND GULABRAO AMBULKAR..Vs.. GOVERDHAN BAPURAO CHARPE & ANR..) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri M.D.Modak, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri S.S.Doifode, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2008. 1. This petition is directed against rejection of applicant's revision by learned Sessions Judge. The petitioner/ original accused had applied to the trial Court vide application Exh.41 for production of certain documents in the custody of the applicant. This application was rejected by the trial Magistrate propelling the petitioner to the Court of Sessions, which, by the impugned order, rejected the revision. 2. The applicant should have realised that his turn to tender evidence would come only after the entire prosecution evidence was taken and he was examined under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. At that time, he could state that he wanted to tender defence evidence, get necessary summons issued to the witnesses as he desired to examine in his defence, and also get summons issued for production of documents as he desired to be produced for proving his case. 2 Even thereafter should his application be rejected he does not have to rush to the Court of Session since even that order would be interlocutory order and he would have to wait for judgment to be rendered. And if he finds anything adverse he could then challenge the judgment, raising all these grounds. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of. JUDGE RR.