RFA No. 2205 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 2205 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision : 27.07.2011 Jai Hind and others ....Appellants Versus Smt. Bhaghoti and others. ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Gitish Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate for HUDA. Mr. N.D.Achint, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 4. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) This appeal is filed against the judgment/award dated March 29, 2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gurgaon whereby market value of land has been assessed @ 717 per square yard. The land belonged to one Dhani Ram who died during the pendency of the reference. His four daughters (now respondents No.1 to 4) were petitioners before the Court of Reference. Three nephews of Dhani Ram i.e. appellants herein, also claimed the right of compensation on the basis of registered Will executed RFA No. 2205 of 2010(O&M) 2 by Dhani Ram in their favour. Vide the impugned award reference Court ordered to apportion the compensation in favour of all four daughters and three nephews and all were held entitled to the compensation as per the share determined by the Reference Court. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants, who were the nephews of Dhani Ram, being aggrieved against the apportionment of compensation in favour of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Respondent No. 5- Het Ram, however, is stated to be proforma respondent and appellants are not claiming any relief qua Het Ram so far as this appeal is concerned. Civil miscellaneous application No. 6288–CI-2011 has been filed in this Court to dispose of this appeal in view of the compromise dated 14.6.2010. Along with this application a compromise (Annexure A-1) effected between the parties in the Court of Smt. Archana Yadav, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon and a copy of the order dated 26th March, 2011 (Annexure A-2) have also been placed on record. Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the said appeal be disposed of in terms of said compromise (Annexure A1) and the order dated 26 March, 2011 (Annexure A2) placed on record along with this application. Ordered accordingly. Aforesaid compromise Annexure A1 and order A2 shall form part of the decree. Disposed of. 27.7.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) savita Judge