IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.976 of 2003 NAWAL KISHORE SAHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 10. 3.5.2010 For the same relief, it is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner approached the District Consumer Forum, which passed an order in his favour. The same was challenged before the State Commission by the Bihar State Housing Board which set aside the order of the District Consumer Forum vide order dated 5.2.2003. This Court by its order dated 22.5.2008 had directed learned counsel for the petitioner to seek instruction in the matter. Despite time being granted repeatedly, no such instruction is available to learned counsel for the petitioner, except that a vague statement is made that the said order dated 5.2.2003 of the State Commission has probably been challenged before the National Consumer Commission. The petitioner having invoked the jurisdiction under the Consumer Protection Act, it would not be appropriate for this Court to again examine the same issue in a parallel proceeding. It is for the petitioner to pursue the remedy provided under the said Act. - 2 - In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ application is dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )