IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 812 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Banwari Lal .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 678/2010 U/s 18/27 of Drugs & Cosmetics Act and 409, 420 IPC, PS Rudraprayag, District Rudraprayag. August 31, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and no recovery of the alleged drugs have been made from his possession. He further submitted that the applicant has got no previous criminal history and he is in jail since 12.7.2010. Learned Addl. GA for the State argued that the accused applicant is employed as Ward Boy in a hospital and he was taking illegal advantage of it. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Banwari Lal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Rudraprayag. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 31.8.2010 PRABODH