THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14954 of 2010 Date: 29.6.2010 Between: M/s.Aunkur Bio Tech rep by its Proprietor K.Raja, NTR Nagar, Hyderabad. ………...Petitioner. And The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture Opp.L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. …… Respondent. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14954 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by M/s.Aunkur Bio Tech represented by its Proprietor K.Raja with a prayer to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the manufacturing and sale of petitioner’s bio-products, which contains Amino Acid and See-Weed Extract, as illegal and arbitrary. When the writ petition came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader for Agriculture takes notice on behalf of the respondent. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Agriculture appearing for the respondent. It is submitted by the learned counsel for both the parties that identical writ petitions have been disposed of and one such writ petition being W.P.No.11336 of 2009, wherein the following order was passed: “It is agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by order dated 26.02.2008 of this Court in Writ Petition No.3913 of 2008, by which the writ petition was disposed of with the following directions: “(a) It shall be open to the petitioner to submit a sample of 5 Kg of each product dealt with by them, together with the corresponding literature throwing light upon the manufacturing process as well as the contents thereof, to the respondent herein; (b) Within four (4) weeks from the date of submission of the samples and the literature by the petitioner, the respondent shall get the same analyzed in a suitable laboratory and intimate the result of the analysis to the petitioner; (c) In case, the analysis reveals that the products dealt with by the petitioner answer the description of the products mentioned in Schedule-III to the Control Order, the petitioner shall be entitled to deal with the products, only after obtaining licence under the Control Order. (d) If the respondent fails to intimate the result of the analysis within four (4) weeks from the date of submission of the samples and the literature, it shall be open to the petitioner to deal with the products notwithstanding the impugned letter and the memo, as long as the products are not insecticides or chemicals.” As this writ petition is identical to the above said writ petition, the same is disposed of in terms of the said order. The directions contained in the said order and reproduced above shall form part of this order.” In view of the directions given in the above referred writ petition, this instant writ petition is also disposed of giving the same directions. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to analyse the samples within a period of eight (8) weeks from receipt of the samples. It is further submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that several ryots have been complaining abut the quality of the products manufactured by the industries being run in the name of Bio-tech. It is made clear that if such complaints are received, the respondent shall be entitled to take appropriate action, according to law, against the industries including the petitioner. No costs. ______________________________________ JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date:29.6.2010 mrb