IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3855 of 2008 Between: 1 A.Jaipal Reddy S/o. A.Raji Reddy Resident of Plot No. 1280/B, 8--293/82A/1280A, Road No. 64, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad- 500 055. 2 A.Rama, W/o. A.Jaipal Reddy Resident of plot No. 1280/B, 8-1-293/82A/1280A, Road No. 64, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Principal Secretary to Govrnment, Revenue ( Excise) Secretariat A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise Andra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Managing Director, APBCL, Hyderabad. 4 Commissioner of Distilleries & Breweries. Andra PRadesh, Hyderabad. 5 Mr. M.G.M.Maran, Managing Partner, M/s. Kamal Wineries, No.1, 9th Street, Dr.Radhakrishna Salai, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. SANDEEP REDDY SARMA FOR MR.S.RAVI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the aforesaid reasons, it is humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order especially in the nature of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent not to consider any proposal of the firm for new tie-ups or tenders and renewal of License ( DM2 ) ( M ) for the year 2008-2009.” Sri Sandeep Reddy Sarma, learned counsel representing Sri S.Ravi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11th JUNE, 2009. kvni