\. zsfr N01133S yaaNn Noiiiiad (•9'0)jndse|!g 'peoy >jui-| '|eq3 qooep 'deAqse^ iifv uqs eie-i o/M deALflse» iisejd '^LUS 'Z ('O'O) jndseiig 'USIQ 'aui-i IIAIQ - uoiteig soiiod e]!4B|/\| qBnojqi qjeBsiyeqqo ^o a^eis 't. siNaaNOdsay ('d'l/M) epempuiqo 'OIUIIQ yesH uiep 'peoy eAisjej o/y ||v sjeeA'fe^'i.noqe paBe 'deAL|se>| jeiunx [luy 9ie-| o/S deAqsex n>|U]4.@ II.LUV "L|S '£ Tf •sjeeA Q£inoqe pe6e 'deAsL|e>i jeuun» qsiufey o//v\ 'deAqse^ ]>|A9Q @ e>||v 'lius 'Z sjeaA Q^jnoqe peBe 'deAL]se>| jeiunx |iuv 91.e~| o/A/\ 'dBAqse>| leqqeino •1019 •\, ...4<'^^ ^..,-^:" K^Z/ ^I^-ON •d-IAI'^3 yndsvnia iv aynivoianr do lynoo HOIH 4^ f '».-' ..-^ f^, ~^if:.^-j^^S" -HC—78 's^ ^ww^, 0xi1y<i6, 'fN^iray .'^.:.9.'.±:.],^ 311^1 'T^i' ('^li^*!^) sn^r w R-ii<* W(I 311^1 stil4 ISB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan ShrivastavauJ. 60^7-2011 'renwflfef afi^i Shri Parag Kotecha, counsd for ti|ie Shri Rakesh Jha, Deputy Governifnent Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, counfeel This petition underSection 482 ofjthe ^uashing of criminal case No.305/08 p^nding lass, Biiaspur. Learned counsei for the petitionej |ay respondent No.2 alleging cru^ty, the I'ead with Section 34 IPC against the pe{ hefore the criminai Court after submissidn [he petitioners and the complainant / ^micably. It is staied that the petitionere| ^eiations and various disputes betwee(i taarticuiariy, in view of the death of the hi for the petitioners further submits that) ^ubmitted an appiication before the Courf ^ame was rejeoted as not maintafriable) ;rPC has been fiied. Learned counsel |he Supreme Court in the case of B.S;,4 Chhatti^garh Paiel and others v. State of ^uch cases, upon compromise, the crimjnai jlf offence under Section 498 -A have befei <:b'Plfcl4t'l 'WT^lf ^f 'f^st' <f»l^l< ^aiRn-sii^i petitionere. [fnent Advocate for the State. for respondent No.2. CrPC has been fiied by the petitioners for in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1 |s submitted that though a report was iodged j)olice registered offence under Section 496-A titioners. Whiie the matter remained pending of chalian by the police, the parties namely i|espondent No.2 have settied their disputes |and respondent No.Z have deveioped cordial the parties have finaliy come to an end itsband of respondent No.2. Learned counsel the petitionere and respondent no.2 have beiow under Section 320 (1) of CrPC but the Thereafter, this petition under Sectton 482 ^ar the petitioners reiies upon the decisron of ..loshi and others v. State.ot'Harvanaand bthers, AIR 2003 S.C. 1386. and order ^assed by this Court in the case of Rajendra and another (Cr.M.P. No.307f1u). in crimjnai proceedings on aiiegatjon of commission s^n quashed. + T XI-HC—78 's^ -^wwi, WTI\W , hv\wy. C.^rv^. \^o • ?l?f-| 311^1IRq? (1pf3^ll) an^T W h-H* ^v ^PTI^ ^i^ y :ih Deepti waiw ^ifro 3ii^i R 1|0 erid fantily Learned State counsei submits permit compromise. Learned counsel for respondeitt counsel for the petitioners and submit^ settiement and respondent No.2 has family dispute has been brought to an From the perusai ofthe petition it is reveated that the petitioners and disputes in the iarger interest of the husband of respondent No.2 isno morej. an applicatibn fbr compounding, before fiied an affidavit before the Court beiow no coercion or compulsion and she o|r peacefui iiving in the family,'has The pelitioner No.1-Smt. Kashyap, petitioner No.S-Shri Amit Kashyap are present in the Court and their disputes and are iiving peacefuiiy. Considering the submissions |the petition is aiiovrod. The criminal |Case No.305/08 are hereby quashed. |that the provisions of Section 320 does not as maintaiited GulAbbai maoe c?>l<l[<'iql*l ';TTO^f ^f 1^^ <pt|^.l< ^aifiiiisn^r No.2 supports the contemion of learned that the parties have entered into amicabie grievance against the petitioners and the for determination to live together peacefully. weil as the documents atong with the same, 1-espondent No.2 have amicabiy settled their and Deacefui life. it is also noted that the j. It is aiso notedthat both the parties moved |he Court below and the respondent no.2 has ateo before this Court to submit that ihere is her own wiil, in the larger interest of the iii|ed cordial relations with the pet'rtioners. Kashyap, petitioner No.2-Smt. Alka l^ashyap and responderrt No.2-Smt. Preeti tttey jointiy submit that the parties have settied and in view of discussions made as above, pijoceedings in the Court beiow under Criminai Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge +