IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18794 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03. 11.11.2009 The only reason why this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ application is because the locus or status of the petitioner has not been stated in so many words. Submission made is that petitioner is an authorized representative of a contractor namely, Gauri Shankar Yadav. There is no explanation as to what is the basis for relationship and what it means in the present writ application. The Court also fails to understand as to why this Gauri Shankar Yadav is shying away to throw a challenge to the tender awarded in favour of another contractor. This is a proxy litigation which has been launched by the petitioner for reasons best known to him. The writ application is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)