THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITON NO.2065 OF 2011 CIVIL REVISION PETITON NO.2174 OF 2011 CIVIL REVISION PETITON NO.2238 OF 2011 CIVIL REVISION PETITON NO.2957 OF 2011 COMMON ORDER: The orders under challenge in these Civil Revision Petitions are based on applications supported by an affidavit allegedly filed by the Manager of the plaintiff. Among other grounds, the said applications were also rejected by the Court below as there was nothing to show that the said Manager was authorised by the plaintiff to file the said applications. In the absence of an authorisation by the plaintiff, authorising such an application being filed, the Court below cannot be said to have committed any error in rejecting the I.As. The order of the Court below, under challenge in these revision petitions, do not, therefore, necessitate interference in proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Sri A. Hanumantha Reddy, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the plaintiff himself would file appropriate applications before the Court below in this regard. It is made clear that the orders passed by this Court will not preclude the plaintiff from filing applications and, on such applications being filed, the said applications shall be considered by the Court below strictly on their merits, and in accordance with law. All the four Civil revision petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 16.09.2011 MRKR