1 cra515-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2010 Chandrabhagabai Anant Jadhav and ors. ..Applicants Vs Dilip Tarakishor Kirtane and ors. ..Respondent -- Mr.Mandar Limaye, for applicants. Mr.R.A.Ronghe, for respondent nos.1 and 2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22 nd NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C: Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for respondents. 2] As recorded in order dated 23 rd September, 2010, the applicants are not pressing the Revision Application on merits and they are seeking time of at least two years to vacate. The applicants have shown willingness to file undertaking to vacate. Learned counsel for respondent opposes the said prayer by pointing out that the litigation is pending for more than 12 years as the applicants have filed a suit for declaration. 3] The applicants have made a statement that they will not press the 2 cra515-10.sxw Revision Application on merits. Therefore, the decree for possession will attain finality. Moreover, they have shown willingness to file undertaking to vacate. The suit is of the year 2003. The decree relates to a small residential premises. If this Revision application was to remain pending in this court for final hearing, the same may not have reached final hearing for few years. Time to vacate deserves to be granted till 31 st October, 2012. 4] Hence, I pass the following order:- (a) Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. (b) Notwithstanding dismissal of Revision Application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 31 st October, 2012 subject to the applicants and all adult members of their family filing usual undertakings to vacate in this court. The undertakings shall be filed within four weeks from today. (c) If the undertakings are not filed within the stipulated period of four weeks from today, it will be open for the respondents to forthwith execute the decree. (d) There will be no orders as to the costs. [A.S.OKA, J]