IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.164 of 2010 KASHI NATH RAI, BRANCH MANAGER, INDUS IND BANK LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ASHOK LEYLAND FINANCE) RESIDENT OF LUV KUSH TOWER, EXHIBITION ROAD, PATNA ………………..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA ZONE, PATNA 3. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GAYA 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEEMCHAK BATHANI, GAYA 5. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, NEEMCHAK BATHANI POLICE STATION, DISTRICT GAYA……………………………….…………………..RESPONDENTS ----------- For the Petitioner: M/s Alok Kumar Shahi & Archana Sinha, Advocates For the State: Learned Addl. Advocate General No.8 *** 2. 26.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that proper investigation is not being made by the local police in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.3/06 on account of which the Indus Ind Bank Ltd., of which petitioner is the Branch Manager, is suffering huge loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inaction of the local police, the accused persons have taken undue advantage and by producing fake documents, have - 2 - got Poklain machine released in their favour. She submits that a direction be issued to the higher officer of the district police to supervise the case to ensure proper investigation of the case. In the circumstances, petitioner is given liberty to file a proper application before the Superintendent of Police, Gaya in this regard and raise all his grievances before him. As and when such a petition is filed by the petitioner, Superintendent Police, Gaya shall look into the matter, make necessary enquiry, as may be required under law, and take steps for expeditious and objective investigation of the case. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)