IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26013 of 2008 ARUN KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 1.9.2008 This matter has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears that by order dated 30th of July, 2008, the petitioner Arun Kumar Jha was allowed anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, as prayed for in the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by mistake in the prayer portion of the petition, it was written that in case the petitioner is granted bail, he may surrender and furnish bail bond to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani instead of Jhanjharpur. Accordingly, as prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition, in course of the day. As prayed for, the petitioner may surrender within a period of four weeks from today before the Sub-Divisional Judicial 2 Magistrate, Jhanjharpur District Madhubani in connection with C.R. No.829 of 2007 (T.R. No.2283 of 2008) and furnish the bail bond as ordered in the earlier order dated 30th of July, 2008. The order dated 30th of July, 2008 is modified to the above extent only. The order dated 30.7.2008 and the present order may be communicated to the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur District Madhubani in connection with C.R. No.829 of 2007 (Trial No.2283 of 2008) at the cost being deposited by the petitioner. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)