SRJ cont.pet-82-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.82 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.250 OF 2009 Sheshnarayan D. Tiwari .. Petitioner V/s. Mumbai Housing Area & Development Authority & Another .. Respondent. Mr. T.R.Yadav i/b. Piyush Shah, for Petitioner. Mr.R.J.Mane, AGP for Respondent Mr.P.B.Pawar, Dy, Engineer, MHADA, present. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J.. DATE : 4th November, 2009. P.C. : 1] Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in support of the Contempt Petition. I have also heard the learned A.G.P appearing for Respondents. 2] The breach alleged is of the order dated 12 th March, 2009 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.250 of 2009. The Division Bench recorded the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent that the SRJ cont.pet-82-09.sxw 2 representation made by the Petitioner will be decided within a period of 6 weeks from the date. 3] The learned A.G.P appearing for the Respondents on instructions states that hearing has been afforded to the Petitioner and the documents submitted by the Petitioner have been sent for scrutiny. He further states that scrutiny is likely to take some time. He further states that an order will be passed on the representation and the same will be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of 6 weeks from today. The learned A.G.P. states that he has made the aforesaid statement on instructions of Shri P.B.Pawar, Dy. Engineer, MHADA. The statements are accepted. 4] In view of the statements, it is obvious that this is not a case in which at this stage, a proceedings can be initiated against Respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. By accepting the aforesaid statement made by the learned A.G.P on instructions, the Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J. )