”/oévw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER s Q. (r): . \W,\;’$ /5 / J\ VERSUS /1. ' Shivanlal Patel S/o Shriram Patel Aged about: 45 years, Occupation Service, Posted Peon/ward boy, C‘H.C. Sarangarh, Distt Raigarh (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Health Services, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS The Director Health Services, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Raigarh, District Raiigarh (C.G.) Chief Medical Officer, R'aigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Medical Officer, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Suresh Kumar Patel S/o Bramha Prasad, Aged about 47 years, Occupation Service, Assistant Grade—II, Office of Chief Medical omcer, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Wins.) No. 196 /2011 / , W 3mm, gahwg, WW SB : H N'BLE . JUSTI 17.16.2611 Shri Manoj Jaiswal, Ac Shri Y. S. Thakur, Dy. Learned counse! for thougl’L the petitianer is ent post of lower division clerk same has not been gran petitioner has already 10.02.201 1 vide Annexure l been decided by respondl direction may be issued. representation of the pei possible. Learned State counsel petition it is not clear as entitled for any promotion objection if the pending representation of the petitioner is decided in accordance with law if not already decided. CE PgJTINEER DIWAKgR ivocate for the petitioner. A.G. for the State. the petitioner submits that :itled for his promotion to the from that of Ward Boy, the ted. He submits that the made representation on P-8 but the same has not ant No.4. He submits that for deciding the pending :itioner as expeditiously as submits that from the to whether the petitioner is or not. However, he has no w 9i? U mm‘y‘p‘w “(H200 mm(®i3a§e) WWW ammonia; mofsam smarts! XLHC~78 WW, gm,m petitioner would be decided by the concerned authority in accordance with law ayp expeditiously as possible if not decided. It ‘is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the pending representation of the peditioner strictly in accordance with law after due scrutiny of the facts. v . ~ " Sdl— Prit'mker Biwakar 3udge Adi ....w‘..e.:.g2,..!.§i%:€.)33 mm m zoo m WW (Wu) mam ammm m Hmm WW rma’f ff “W3W a: aim m Accordingly, the pe1tition is disposed of with a direction that the penq‘iing representation of the