^ Ti^ /rit Peiitison (Sl No. 5844 of 2007 1 'j Smt. Uma Bai Rai.qir, Aaed 46 years, W/o. Late Gokul Prasad Rai.air. 2) Dinesh Kumar Rajgir, Aged 24 years, S/o. Late Gokui Prasad Rajgir. 3) 4) 1) h/laheksh Kumar Rajgir, Aged 23 years, S/o. Late Gokui Prasad Rajgir. Ravi Kumar Raigir, Aged 19 years, S/o. Late Gokul Prasad Ralgir. All petitioners are r/o. Krishna Nagar, Juna Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary', Department of Schooi Education, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2) The District Education Officer, Biiaspur, Dlstrict Biiaspur (CG). 3) Smt. Urmila Bai Rajgir, aged 53 years, W/o. Late Gokul Prasad Raiair. r/o. Krishna Nagar, Juna Bilaspur, Distriot Bllaspur. 4) Ajit Kumar Rajg'ir, Aged 36 years, S/o. Late Gokul Prasad Rajgir, vi'orklng as Assistant Teacher, At Govt. H.S.S. Khamhariya, Block i^asturi, District Bilaspur (CG), r/o. Krishna Nagar, Juna Biiaspur, Distriot Bilaspur. /'.VVrit PeSition under Article 226 of ths Constitution of india) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satssh K. Agnlhotri, J. S.hr.i R.K. Keshawani, counsei for the petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha; Deputy Advocate General for the State. assed on 19°' Fe St ?1) Bv t'nis petition, the petitioners, who are wife and children of the deceased Goku! Prasad Rajgir, are ciaiming retiral benefits. (2) Learned oounsel appearing ror the petitioners submit that on 19.06.2006 in W.P. No. 196-1/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgar'n and others), this Court passed the foiiowlng order: "L- ".....In turn, the A.G. Office is getting incorrect information and not able to give authority letter at the time of retirement of an empioyee, therefore, a committee consisting offoilowing officers te constituted: (1) Special Secretary (Finance), (Chairman), (2) Any officer of the rank of Additionat Secretary of La**' Department, (Member), (3) Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, (Member), (4) Deputy Accountant General (Funds), (Member), (5) Joint Secretary (General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgam), (Member cum Secretary)" (3) Learned counse! appearing for the Statesubmits that pursuant to the above order a Committee, oonsisting of the above-stated officers has been constituted to look into the grievances of the retired empioyees, in respect of reiirai aues. {4) Learned counsei appearinci for the State further submits that the said Committee is in existenoe and all the dispuies, raised by the petrLioners in this petition, may be decided by the said high power Committes, within prescribed tims. (5) In this petition, the dlsputed question of facts with regard to the retiral dues (supra) are Invoived, whio'n cannot be decided by this Court, as the disputed questtons of facfs can be resoived by the high povrer committse (supra) in consuitation with the retired employee and the ooncerned officers. Thus, 1 am of the considered opinion that it would be iust and expedient to direct the above Committee, so constituted, to look into the disputes and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law (6) Acoordingly, the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall Issue notice to t'ne aggrieved retired emptoyee and the officers concerned, within a furt'ner period of 15 days. The Committee s'nall consider and pass order, in acoordance wit'n iaw, after affording proper opportunity of nea.'ing to the empioyee. The emp'ioyee -3 concerned and the offjcers concerned may fiie additional documents, if necessar/. The entire exeroise, including payment of retiral dues (supra), if any, to the petittoner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt ofa oopy ofthis order. (7) Extra copy of the petition will be suppiied to learned counsei appearing for the State for orAvard transmission tofhe Committee (8) In visw of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge