^^~ iN THE HIGiH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W._p-_Nu^ _ J^^'-_T_/2uOb ^A^^ ^^i^i il?iGaB s'aSiN WtW!Sf PETITIONER snyamacnaran Kai; Agea aDout 3lyears, S/o. Shri Laideo Rai, R/o. v'jilage B PO! Singibahar, Tah. Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (CG) RESPONDENTfS ^11 ^y".. ^^v ?^>"^ .^y ^yy '^y' 31 ^4^ .-^^\ ° ^ ^^ 'c^^" J1 v"tR5Ub State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Tribal 'vVeifare Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan; Raipur (CG) Loiiector, uantewaaa, Distt Dakshi'n Bastar, Dantewada (CG) uirector, pancnayat ana Gramin viKas Vibhag, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ChieT Executive Orficer, Janpad Kancnayat; Bnairamgarn, District uantewada fCU) Block Educatton Officer, Janpad Pancnayat, Bhairamgarh, District uantewada (Cb) 61 Chief Executive Officer, -^ Ziia Panchayat; Dantewada, District uantewada (Ctj) <-" WjRIT PETITJON UNDEKAgTiCLE 226/2Z7 OF THE CONSTITUT'ON OF !NDiA HIOH COURT OF JDDICATURB CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Sisgf.e Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. Mo. 1224 OF 2006 Petitioner : Shyaiaacharan Rai Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, coi-msel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Otwaai, panel Jawyer for fhe respondents. ORAL ORDER (25th Mach, 2006) 1. This petition chaUenges the iinpugaed order dated 30.11.2005, (Annexure P-8), passed by ftie respondent No.5, whereby the OfBcer Incbarge of Primary School Medpal, Block Bhairamgarh, District Daatewada, has been directed that the order dated 20.10.2005, (Aanexure P-5), passed by the Jaapad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, appointing Shiksha Kamii, Grade-III, be not gwen efFect to wifhout permission of Distnct Collector, Daatewada. 2. Learaed coiinsel for fhe petitioner subnuts fhat the petitioner was duly selccted aad appoin^ted as Shiksha Karmi Grade-IJI, vide order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P- 5), passed by fhe respondent No.6. 3. The petitioner was informed fhat the entire selection process appointing Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, has been canceUed. It is further conteaded that fhe petitioner has not received any written inforaaation as yet about canceltation of fhe selection proceedings, or tus appoiatment. 4. Leamed coimsel appearing for the respondents No.l, 2 aad 3, subinits fhat the petitioner has never joined pyrsuaa^to ^.. his selection and appointment as Shiksha Kamii, Grade-III. It was further subinitted that snice the entire selection proceedings have been quashed and new selection process has been initiated, the petitioner does not have any right to fhe appointment. 5. Be that as it inay, leamed cozuisel for the petitioner submits that fhe petitioner has inade a representation, (Aonexure P- 10) to the Secretaiy Schedufed Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backward Classes, Welfare Departnien.t, Govemiiient of Chliatdsgarh, therefore, the respondents inay be directed to decide fhe said representation wifhin a stiputated period. 6. Having heard leamed coiuisel for the parties, ia the facts and circuinstaiices offhe case, the respoadents are directed to consider aad decide fhe representation (Amiexiire P-10), in. accordance wifh law, within a period ofthree weeks, fi^oin the date ofreceipt/production ofcopy offhis order. 7. In view of foregoing, fhis petition staads disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge c^'