IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25795 of 2009 1. MUNARIK KUMAR RAI @ MUNDARIK RAI 2. SHANKAR RAI @ NARESH RAI 3. LAL SAHEB KUMAR @ LAL RAI 4. MUKHDEO RAI --------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.3 is said 14 years old, a juvenile, needs his trial from Juvenile Justice Board, I am not going to allow him any relief. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. He is directed to get his age assessed by the court where the case is pending including the court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in Complaint Case No. 169 © of 2007 and seek proper remedy from the Juvenile Justice Board. As about rest of the petitioners that is petitioners 1,2 and 4, it is said that daughter of the complainant was already married, having kids from her earlier marriage and petitioner no.3 was minor one, so there was no question to accept the statement of the complainant to marry his daughter with petitioner no.3 and - 2 - only to make pressure this case is lodged. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos.1,2 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, in Complaint Case No. 169 © of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI