^1 c ^•^^ IN__THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR M.C.C No. -763/2010 (Arising out ofWP (S) No. 36.96/.2005)'-: OldO.A. No. 76/19^8" S@r w €11 APPLICANT: PETITIONEI Dwarika Prasad Chandrakar, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Kali Ram Chandrakar, R/o Village Nandgaon Post Belsonda, Tahsil and District ..-^\77 ^ .1^^' r'u^t rseisunaa^ ,.^•^"1 ^'^ , A^) >l^ Mahasamund (CG) ^^ ..^^ ^^...-•••"' VER S U S ^ RESPONDENTS: 1, State of Madhya Pradesh now State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Public Works Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). Pramukh Abhiyanta,' Satpura Bhawan, Bhopal 5. 6. Mukhya Abhiyanta (East) Lok Nirman Vibhag (B/R) Raipur M.P. Adhikshan Yantri, Lok Nirman Vibhag (B/R) , Raipur Mandal, Raipur (CG). The Karyapalan Yantri, Lok Nirman Vibhag (B/R) M:ahasaraund Sambhag,, Mahasamund 493445 (CG).' The Collector, Raipur , District Raipur (CG). APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETmON DISSMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -HC-22 sn^r^r f^iwsTri^r ^TW^rf^ Despti •^Ef ^iqiQiq, ^Til^^Ko, fN^TRTy 3^7t?T 'q^W Mc.c.^..:.^4^ 'i^^ST" 'sn^i'^^iw^riN SB;Hon'bieShriManindraMohan ^N^ft^ ^P^ff 'H ^S TT^R ^T3^W W^T Shrivastava,J. 07-12-2010 Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsei |?or the applicant. Shri Satish Gupta, Govemm^nt Advocate for the State/tespondent Nos.1 and 6 on advance copy. Heard on i.A.No.1, appiicati^n for condonation of deiay in fiiing restoration appiication. Taking into consideration the inciined to condone the delay in fiiing Accordingiy, the appiication is ^iiowed. Deiay in fiiing restoration appiii cause shown in the appiication, 1 am estoration appiication. ?ation is hereby condoned. in the application for restorati^n, it has been stated that the petition was dismissed for want of-prosecut|on as the counsei eariier engaged at Raipur nor the applicant was knowir SPC was aiso not served. As the SP^ know about the dSsrnissaS of the petitil and certifled copy has been obtained been fiied. Taking into consideration the j opinion of this Court, case of restoratj| Accordingly, this application i^ about the listing of the case and the p v^as not served, iong after, he came to jsn. Thereafter, a counsei was engaged |and then the resto?~ation appiication has ^rounds ui~ged in the appiication, in the t>n of the petitEon is made out, aiiowed. The order of dismissai dated 22/2/2010 is hereby recaiied and th^ writ petition is restored to its originaj number. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge [^ ^fep>