IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28014 of 2009 Abhishak Kumar Singh, son of Upendra Kumar, resident of Mohalla-Naya Bazar, P.S.-Tatarpur (Kotwali), District- Bhagalpur Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Pintu Kumar Pandey @ Pramod Kumar Pandey, resident of Mohalla-Golgahat, P.S.-Tatarpur (Kotwali), District- Bhagalpur. ----------- 2. 05.09.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this application under Section 439 (2) of the Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail, which was granted to the opposite party no.2 vide order dated 12.06.2009 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in B.P.No.624/09. Heard Mrs. Pravina Kumari, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C.Jawahar, learned counsel for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after granting of the bail, the petitioner has been threatened by the opposite party no.2 several times. The learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner cannot be considered at this stage. The petitioner may file a petition before the trial court, if such threatening is given. 2 After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties, it appears that the contention of the learned counsel for the State is correct. I do not find any ground to interfere with the orders. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance, if and when such occasion arises before the learned trial court, which shall be considered by the learned trial court. In the result, this application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)