IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1337 of 2010 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 3200/2004) 1. Basant Kumar Prasad S/O Ram Prasad Raut R/O Vill.- Hati, P.S.- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani 2. Vijay Kumar Dutta S/O Late Chiranjiv Lal Dutta Vill.- Sisauni, P.S.- Harlakhi, Distt.- Madhubani 3. Saiful Islam S/O Md. Kasim Vill.- Makrampur, P.S.- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani 4. Surendra Prasad S/O Ram Prasad Raut Vill.- Halti, P.S.- Pandaul, Distt.- Madhubani ---- Appellants. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Selection Committee Through Its Chairman District & Sessions Judge, Madhubani 3. The District & Sessions Judge, Madhubani 4. The Registrar, Civil Court, Madhubani ----- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 11.8.2011 Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. The present intra court appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been filed against the order dated 15.7.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3200 of 2004 (Basant Kumar Prasad & Ors. Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) by which the writ petition filed by the appellants was dismissed. The appellants had filed the writ petition against the appointment made to the posts of process server under the Judgeship of Madhubani. The appellants had only made allegation with regard to the process of selection being 2 initiated without coming up with or disclosing any specific contravention of the procedures which could have taken cognizance by the Court. It is also a fact that the appellants themselves were applicants for such posts but could not ultimately succeed. From the record it appears that the due course as prescribed under law had been followed i.e., there was issuance of advertisement followed by interview and finally the list of successful candidates was prepared. In that view of the matter the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that with regard to the selection nothing substantive had been demonstrated regarding discrimination or breach of condition of appointment. After hearing learned counsel for the appellants and upon perusal of the materials on record, we do not find any infirmity with the order under appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah,J.)