IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA 1671 of 2011 Date of decision:6.4.2011 HVPNL Petitioner vs. Phoolpati Respondent Present: Mr. KS Malik, Avocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The courts below have decreed the suit of the plaintiff- respondent holding as a fact that she fulfilled all the eligibility conditions laid down in the policy and was, thus, entitled to be regularized w.e.f. the date other employees were regularized i.e. 23.10.2003. Learned counsel for the defendant- appellant has contended that vide memo dated 27.8.2008 the policy had been withdrawn, as such the plaintiff was not entitled to be regularized on the basis of the policy. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and gone through the judgments passed by the courts below. The courts below have rightly declared memo dated 27.8.2008 as illegal and rightly held that the plaintiff- respondent is entitled to be regularized from the date the other employees were regularized. No ground is made out for interference in the current finding of fact. No substantial question of law is involved. Dismissed. April 6 ,2011 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE