1 2325.10-wp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2325 OF 2010 Paulson Joseph Pallitra ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. Ms.Rashmi Gajwani i/b. Ganesh Gole for the petitioner. A.S.Shitole, APP for the State. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 14th June 2011. P.C. : The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order of externment. It is the contention of the petitioner that since the impugned order infringes fundamental rights of the petitioner, the petitioner can approach this Court directly in its jurisdiction under Articles 226 of the Constitution. She placed reliance on the judgment of learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Dhananjay Manohar Sapkal v. State of Maharashtra, 2005 Mh.L.J. 2 384. 2. No doubt that non-exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court on the ground of availability of an alternate remedy is a rule of self-restraint. However, in the present case, no case is made out to entertain this petition in extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. Petition is, therefore, rejected on the ground of availability of alternate remedy of filing appeal to the State Government. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)