C-78 PBTITIONE ^T5Er;:ZTRTraRT, u>-a1<(i<|<ft, Rrtl^^ ^ *l 1*1Wl ^^TT^ 3TT^9T q^cp (4cli^<sl<Ei) ^200 3n^^TcpTR-l|cb cT2n3Ti^?Ta?Hr<p ?^IT^^rf^T3n^$T W.P. (81 fcio.6557 of 2008 PETITIONER Virend^a Kumar Ratre, S/o Late Shn Gaapat jaged about 32 years, R/o Ohm Nagar, Jarhabpaata, Bilaspur (CG) Ratre, Jarhablhata IVersus RESPONDENT8 1. State o^ Deparfca(ient 2. Coianiis Raipur 3. District Chhattisgarh, through- Secretaiy, Exise lient, State of Chhatdsgarh, Raipur (CG) |sioner of Exise, State of Chliattisgarh, ICG) jExise Of&cer, Bilaspur (CG) Writ Petition under A»ti41e226 ofthe Coastitution ofladla S.B Hon*ble Shri Dhirendral 25.11.2008 Shri Ashok Dubey, Shri P.K. Bhadiui, Pane| Heanl. The petitioner by the ia|5 fhe respondents to conside^ coiapassionate appoiatment dated 23.9.2008. Leamed counsel for <he pressirig tibds petition at this file appUcation for com.pas4ionate format as per circular of filiag ofsuch appUcation, the same wifhia fhe speci&ed [period. cpi^frt41vi +ij^oT^?f^St ^Fji^-ei^ ^ 3Tf^T OT^^T Mishra. J. cou4sel for fhe ^titioner. Lawyer for fhe State. staat petition has prayed for direction to the case of the petitioner for giviag slccordiag to the circular of Annexure P-3 ^he petitioner submlts fhat he is not |stage; however, he may be permitted to ^ionate appomtrtteat m the prescribed Aimlexurc P-2, dated 10th June 2003 and on furt|ier direction to fhe respondents to decide S^SK^. ^oET T^iqioq, y-rfl^<l<i, Rlril^^ *l 1*10)1 ^TTqp 3TT^$T q^P (^clijd^) ^200 3TT^?TcpTf^Tfq? c1i2n3T^?T?CTt<l? ^^TT^R^f^T3n^$T cyTOfcrf^T WTc^'^'fer^t ^R^K ^3Tf^HOT^$T Learaed counsel for the S|ate submits that in case, fhe petitioner files appUcation for compassij^nate appomtoient in fhe prcscribed fonnat before fhe respondeut I|ro.2 along with copy of fhis order, the same shaU be considered and (lecided by fhe respondent No.2 as per policy of fhe State Govemmeii^ within a period of three monfhs from fhe date ofreceipt of appUcatio3|L. In view of fhe above sliibmisskm of leamed counsdl for ft parties, the iastaat petition is (pisposed ofwith liberty to tiie petitioner to file appUcation for coii^passionate appomtoient before the respondent No,2 in fhe prescrit{>ed format alongwith copy oftfais order. On such appUcation beiag file^1, the respondent No.2 shaU decide fhe same wifhm a period of fhreje months J&om fhe date of rc<^ipt of appUcation. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge