IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 37419 of 2007(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- CHETTIKKAD COIR VYAVASAYA CO.OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO. 173, CHETTIKKAD, NORTH PARUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THANKAMANI. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.R.KIRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SALE OFFICER/INSPECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COIR PROJECT OFFICE, NORTH PARUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SARASWATHI,W/O. LATE BHASKARAN, C/O.SAJEEV, HOUSE NO. 204,WARD NO.10, VIP COLONY,VEDIMARA, MANNAM P.O. NORTH PARUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== W.P.(C)No.37419 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 11th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader appears for respondents 1 and 2. Having regard to the nature of the directions being issued hereunder, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with, preserving his liberty to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. 2. Petitioner obtained an award against the late husband of the third respondent, who was at one time the Secretary of the petitioner Society. That has snowballed into execution proceedings. Through this writ petition, the petitioner Society seeks orders interdicting the third respondent from alientating the properties which are under attachment and stated to be covered by certain WPC37419/2007 -:2:- agreements by which late Bhaskaran and his son had agreed to pay off the outstandings. 3. The aforesaid facts would show that the domain of this Court does not require to be extended because, the first respondent, the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies and the second respondent, the Sale Officer/Inspector of Co-operative Societies have sufficient authority under the Act and the Rules to pass such orders as are necessary to ensure that the execution proceedings are carried to its logical end and still further that no alienation takes place in violation of the execution proceedings. Under such circumstances, respondents 1 and 2 are directed to ensure that the execution proceedings in question are expedited and enforced finally within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a WPC37419/2007 -:3:- copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.