IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7243 of 2011 SHIV SHANKAR SINGH @ SHANKAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 being father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively and petitioner no.3 being the husband of the victim are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation against the petitioners is of torture and performing second marriage of petitioner no.3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that after marriage petitioners came to know that the complainant was earlier married to one Upendra Singh. It appears that the petitioner no.3 (husband) filed the divorce case on 28.10.2009 when the present complaint was filed on 16.12.09. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the 2 petitioners that the petitioner no.3 has not performed second marriage. Considering the fact that divorce case was filed at earlier point of time, let the petitioners, Shiv Shankar Singh @ Shankar Singh, Saroj Devi and Sunil Kumar Singh, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint P.S. Case No.2345 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)