RSA No. 108 of 2003 20.11.2008 Present: Shri M.S. Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant. Shri A.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents 1 to 4.f193 CMP No. 1092 of 2008 A prayer is made by the appellant in this application for withdrawal of the appeal as having been compromised by setting aside the judgment and decree passed in Civil Suit No. 75-1 of 1988/87 by the learned Sub Judge Ist Class, Ghumarwin, which is subject matter of the present appeal. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not oppose this prayer. This application is accordingly allowed and judgment and decree passed in Civil Suit No. 75-1 of 1988/87 by the learned Sub Judge Ist Class, Ghumarwin, which is subject matter of this appeal is set aside. Accordingly, the judgment in appeal of the District Judge, which confirmed this judgment, is also set aside. Ext.P1 gift deed is upheld in favour of the appellant. The present appeal is dismissed as having been compromised. CMP No. 476 of 2008 Infructuous, in view of the appeal as having been compromised. RSA No. 108 of 2003 Since the judgment and decree of learned trial Court as affirmed by the learned Appellate Court has been set aside as compromised, this appeal does not survive and disposed of as such. The gift deed Ext.P1 in the suit is upheld in favour of the appellant. All interim orders stand vacated. All pending miscellaneous application (s) also stand disposed of. November 20, 2008(ms) (Dev Darshan Sud), J.