THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.No.1020 of 2010 ORDER: This revision has been filed challenging the order dated 12.05.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.154 of 2010 in Crl.A.No.244 of 2010 by the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the de facto complainant failed to prove that the cheque in dispute was issued for discharge of the debt and the surrounding circumstances create suspicion about the very issuing of the cheque for the purpose as stated by the de facto complainant and that these facts are not taken into consideration by the trial Court. 3. It is true that, for suspending the sentence of imprisonment, reasons have to be recorded, but that does not mean that a detailed order should be passed by the appellate Court. 4. In the circumstances, the sentence of imprisonment shall be suspended on condition of the petitioner executing a bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the appeal before the appellate Court. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. _____________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J Date:27.05.2010 sj