C.R.No.6694 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6694 of 2007. Decided on August 27, 2009. Yashpal and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Bhagat Industrial Corporation Limited. .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Neeraj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioners are the successors-in-interest of judgment debtor Jagmal Singh, who was a partner of M/s Laxmi Sales. Vide order dated 04.12.2006, the executing Court while deciding the objections under Section 47 CPC, had held that objector Jagmal Singh, now deceased, remained liable to pay decretal amount and the objections under Section 47 CPC, of the objector were dismissed and it was held that his legal heirs Yashpal son, Neelam and Picco daughters, and Satya his widow, would be liable to the extent of share acquired by them from Jagmal Singh from firm M/s Laxmi Sales. Thereafter, the decree holder was . . . 1 C.R.No.6694 of 2007 directed to supply information pertaining to the share which was acquired by the LRs of Jagmal Singh in order to satisfy the decree. Thereafter, objections were filed against the attachment of the property of petitioners. The said objections were dismissed vide order dated 06.09.2007. As per the provisions of CPC, adjudication of claims and objections to attachment can be filed under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC. Order 21 Rule 58 (4) CPC reads as follow :- '(4) Where any claim or objection has been adjudicated upon under this rule, the order made thereon shall have the same force and be subject to the same conditions as to appeal or otherwise as if it were a decree.' In view of above said provisions, the dismissal of the objections against attachment could be challenged by filing an appeal. The revision petition is, thus, not maintainable, as such, it is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail legal remedy available to the petitioners in accordance with law. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 27, 2009. rka . . . 2