1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 10086/2010 Manoj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 11.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Sanjay Gangwar - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State Mr Anurag Kulshreshtha – for complainant BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter. Recovery of Rs.2 lacs has wrongly been related to this matter, in fact, it was arranged for his sister's marriage. Petitioner was not otherwise named in the FIR. It is a case where NGO was given funds by the company and out of total funds given, a sum of Rs.12 lacs were spent on purchase of material for kids. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor so also learned counsel for complainant have opposed the bail application. It is stated that after placing the cheque and getting a sum of Rs.35 lacs in the 2 NGO's account , a sum of Rs.12 lacs were withdrawn from ICICI bank. A sum of Rs.2 lacs recovered from the petitioner were containing slips of ICICI bank. Looking to the aforesaid petitioner is directly involved in the matter and hence he may not be enlarged on bail. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma