c "I^° XN SHE HI©HGGPaT ®F>?UDI<3ATOEB AT BILAS]BUB (G.S.) mi'E' SETITX®NG. ll3s O? 2001 „/ BB'EWSSN Eu^aal •M.wari S/o- Shri Kedai? 'ttwari, aged aboat years, Eesideals af I»alah»a]eala, Bos't 'I'usdafe,MahasamHai3, ..••:'^ ^\-'^/ EB"CZTIC R X S B • .^v'% iK&Y" ••\w<v ^•••' .-•'.•^. <^.3-^' ^^^"".. ^y. 2* ^-' App&tlate Ayt.hori'fey/censeBvator of Stearests BaipttF BtvisioR, QAa'fctisgari'i* ©f'E'ieer'of Rares'fc BBard Mahas?iBUBd(Seiieral ) Board of Borest , Mahasanaid. GelleetoE, Bist.irie'fe Mabasamund. ic' State ef Cbhafetlsgarh, threugh the ©alleetorDls'ferlct Mahasaraaad. SSSWSBE8W WEE'E-;.nE3;I2IiaS.:OTfBER"ftRTieESg:::2267S27&©tR'lBB WSSS'S'S'EVSTSW, @? »BI» ;XI-HC-22 sn^rqCT f^iraisn^T %i]R;g1?(f <-5< A 3^ •^l'llld'4, 8nflu'16, Rltnwy •fl*tdTSt>*1iq)^^3^^ (qo<a Sfl^lBWKRdfer 10-8-2005 Shri H.V.Sharma, Advocati 5hri Yashwant Singh, 6ovtj Learned counsel for petitioner has inadvertently 226/227 of the Constitution oi dated 19-3-2001 passed by the whereas the petitioner ought before the District Judge. Th^ petition with tiberty to prefer Judge against the sud order. The petitibn is dismissed In view of this order, I.A. cbiitcf'in-i t)itic)i'ffte^<fa'Ki< ^aTRtffw^r for the petitioner. - Adv. for the State. t^e petitioner submitt'ed that the pre^erred this petition under Articles Indiaa90Linst the appellate order ponservator of Forest, Chhattisgarh to have preferred appeal/revision i^refore, he wonts to withdraw this oypeat/revision before the District ds withdrawn ywith liberty aforesaid. psto. 4126/2001 stouids disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge — (tft^y^) 1& "^ N.