IN THE HIGH COURT OF JU&ICATURE AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION N0. •z. OF ^©©- ^3t.E?' .,--•'.,;-;^x-o u PETITIONER (Defendant No.l) Kamal Kishore Agarwal, son of Shri Nathmal Agawral, aged about 40 years, resident of Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil <& District Bilaspur (C6) Vs RESPONDENTS (Plaintiff & defendants No.2 to 7) ..••"J^rl >^^^> ^y^ 3^€<^ ^^•^ 1?£^^ G^ 1. Nathmal Agawral, son of Late Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, aged about 63 years, resident of Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur-, Tehsil <& District Bilaspur (C6) 2. Smt. Sarla Devi Agarwal, wife of Shri Nathmal Agarwal, aged about 57 years, resident of Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur (C6) 3. Manoj Kumar Agawral, son of Shri Nathmal Agarwal, aged about 37 years, resident of Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur (C6) 4. Vinay Kumar- Agawral, son of Shri Nathmal Agarwal, aged about 30 years, resident of Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur (C6) 5. Smt. Sandhya Rani Agarwal, wife of Shri Naresh Kumar Agarwal, aged about 32 years, r-esident of Dhillon Complex, Jawahar Nagar, Raipur (C6) 6. Smt. Dimple, wife of Shri Arvind Mittal, aged about 26 years, resident of Katghora, C/o M/s Ashok Rice Mill, Katghora, District Kor-ba (C6) 7. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Raipur (i;6) REVISION UNOER SECTION 115 OF THE CO&E OF CIVIL PROCEbURE. 1908 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. 1239 OF 2011 Nathmal Agrawal PETITIONER/ PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS Versus Kamai Kishore Agrawal and others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA CIVIL REVISION N0. 2 OF 2011 Kamal Kishore Agrawal PETITIONER/ DEFENDANT N0.1 RESPONDENTS (Plaintiff & Defendants No.2to7) Versus Nathmal Agrawal and others. REVISiON UNDER SECTION 115 OFTHE CODE OF CIViL PROCEDURE. 1908 i (Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.l Present : Shri Virendra Sharma, counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(227)No. 1239/2011. Shri Kshitij Sharma, counsel for the applicant in C.R. No.2/2011. Shri Vinod Tekam, counsel forthe State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 18th day of March, 2011) Both the parties in the above matters are aggrieved by order dated 09-11-2010 passed by Civil Judge, Class-ll, Kasdol, District Raipur in Civil Suit No.l-A/2010 whereby and whereunder on defendants' application filed under Order 7 Rule 10'& 11 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as''the CPC'), the Trial Court has held: the suit would be maintainable only with respect to property situated within its territorial jurisdiction and declined to entertain the defendants' application filed under Section 10 read with section 1,51 of CPC. 1 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. ^^iaSSSSi r^ aBpnp -/PS •jo pssodsip sje uoisiAey IIAIQ pue uoi)!<ad )UM 'uoi}eAjasqo sAoqe 94} 4)i/v\ •L •AlBuipjoooe psioajip si ynoQ |eui SL|} pue Me| qijM aouepjoooe ui siuaui UMO sii uo ynoo [eui 341 Aq pspiosp aq 0) psjinbej si auies 9t|} 'peujsouoo si QdO ^o 1,31, uojioes 4}iM pesj oi. uoiioss jepun uoiieoiidde ,siuepua)8p se sei 03 '9 spise iss Aqsjay si QdO i° I.S l. uoipss W./A peaj i. i.s O I. 3|ny apJQ japun uo|teoi]dde ,s}uepU3j9p Q} pje6sj qiim peuBndiu! jspjo aq} 'OAOqe uiejey pauoiiueLU suoseej 34} JQJ •g •ynoo Jnedseiig p uoipipsunf 84} uiqijM A|}Jed pue uoitoips.unf |BUO}UJS} s)i uiyiiM A|yed 'S}OU)S!P OM) ui psieniis A}J3dojd 3|qeAOLuiui 0} BuiieieJ )ins sq) uieyaiue o) uoipipsunf pei| ]jnoo |eyi 341 se L|onLU se ui uoipipsunf (no^iiM si od0 jo 1,91 uoiioag 4)iM pesj n'SO^ s|ny Z JSpJQ .ispun uoj}eo!|dde ,stuepus^9p uo jepjo s.ynoo |BU) 34} 'eAoqe 94} jo MSIA u| •^ •pejentis si Aysdojd eij) p uoijjod Aue uoipipsynf esoqM jo siiiuii |eoo| 04} uiqiiM ynoo Aue ui pa}nt!}sui eq Aeiu }ins 341 'stinoo luajsjyip ;o uojtoipsunf 9L(} UIIOIM aienijs AlJedojd siqBAOLULUi 'O} BUOJM JO^ uoitesuediuoo jo 'fiuipadssj ^siisj uieiqo 01 si iins e ajaqM 'QJO ^o Zl uoiioes jsd sy 'lJnoo jndse|ig ^o uoipipsunf jeuo^jjei uiqijM Aiyed pue MO|3q }jnoQ p uoiioipsunf |euo.|uj9} uiqiiM peientis A|}jed Aysdojd siqeAOiuiui o} psdsaj 4}iM peiy sem moiaq jjnoo SM) ajo^sq tins 341 •£