IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 27902 of 2010 Date of decision:9.11.2010 Anoop Petitioner vs. State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr. Arvind Thakur, Advocate. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case, registered at the instance of Mukesh Kumar alleging that he being a driver of a four wheeler, was carrying 122 cartons of chicks on 13.8.2010 to be taken to the destination Radhey Sham Poultry Farm. While the complainant was inquiring about the location of the poultry farm, the petitioner along with another person approached the complainant and disclosed him that his name was Radhey Sham, as a result of which the truck carrying chicks was taken to the poultry farm of the petitioner. The recovery of chicks has already been made. It will be debatable if the complainant knew the petitioner or that the petitioner was able to commit the robbery of the chicks, carried in the truck of the complainant bringing the action of the petitioner within the ambit of Section 390 IPC punishable u/s 392 IPC. Since the recoveries have already been made, it does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 22.9.2010 is hereby confirmed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. November 9 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE