IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8235 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 06, 2010. Tajinder Singh and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns Clause-15 of the appointment letter dated 1.12.2006 (Annexure P-3). Reliance is placed on an earlier decision as well as the interim orders passed by this Court in some other cases. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have served the respondents with a legal notice dated 3.2.2010 (Annexure P-13) to which there is no response so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to take cognizance of the afore-mentioned legal notice dated 3.2.2010 (Annexure P-13) and dispose of the petitioner's claim by passing a C.W.P.No .8235 of 2010 2 speaking order, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE