y^- 'ia. [} v IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CMHAmSGARH WRIT PETITION No. 9^-2.0F2004 PET3TIQNERS ..-^ .-^^< . ^<^^ ^^^ ~ 2. ^-' ^w' <-'^"..--' '^^ •"" Versus RESPONDENTS K. R. Bhalavi,aged about36 years, S/o Shri B. L. BhalavS, presently posted as Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Mandi Board, Jagdalpur, district Bastar (Ch+iattisgarh) T. Toppo, aged about 38 years, S/o Late Shri Benjamin Toppo, presently posted as Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Mandi Board, Ambikapur Mandi, Ambikapur, district Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Agncultural Marketing Board (Mandi Board)throughits • Managing Director, Raipur 1 (Ghhattisgarh) 3. The Agriculture Production Commissioner, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Agriculture, Mantralaya, D. K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ft ^—x^WRFT PETrFION UNDER AR-TICLE &6/227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L'^US '^^^^^^^^J-^^^ 33-HC-221 'S^ •^MivPf, ^•fll'M'ls, 1°<cli^y "%;(W3II^ .te..;£ '0..-.^.^2- 3i)S?[ TOIRR'gftCT 30.06.2004 las^i tbr tfae petitifluer. rer for thc State, Slui Sameer Behar, coiinsell Stori Alok Bakstii, Panel Shri Ranbir Smgh, Counscl|forTespondents/B€>ard. Heard. Tbe matter is such where thi Chliatlisgarti Rajya Kiislu Vipaiu4i Boaid. wav pruiuoljed aud uow fhcy arc bdng tcvcrtcd. It is sul^nuttcd fhat fhc pctitioncrs wcrc proniotcd on purcly adhoc baais 0(1 13.5.2002. Shri Ranbir Singh subnuta docunient (Annexure R-2). It is discuesed by the Board and the conclusion that the proinotions ^vere not vaUdly inade and they have to be scrutiniized. He subiujts fhat pursuant theieto, iiotices have heen issiicd. Somc ofthe pe|ftion(TS Tiave filcd thc reply. Leamed counsel appeariag repty of fhe petitioners will be ccjnsidered and they will be heard and aRer ticarmg the petitioners t^ie onlers will be passcd. ^^F^i ttn^ ^ TS^ ^F^^K cft" 3lP(!H3!I^T petitloners wtio are worktag m that retum hag been ffled witfa subnutted that fhe niatter was Boaxd priina fecie caiue to fhe for fhe Board submits fhat fhe -* > ^- • ['q^^F^T "l':,ll",,t!i' W-**- XI-HC—78 ^s? "^i^id^, ®'fl1wi<a,fa<-iiy;i< 3®^!^ wi^CT»'?iW*iro m In view of fhis submissionl already notfiled, wifhia 10 da^s same shall be consideicd and fhe petitmners may file replies, if fiom today and fhereaftcr tfae c|ecided by the Board as carty as possibty preferabty wlttun 2 |nonths (hereafter, after gndng oppommity ofhearing. Tffl fhe dcefeioa te takcn, pie pctltfoners may be continucd ou their piumolioiial posts. Wifh ttus obscrvation, fhis Conscqucnify, applicatioa diaposedof. .Cc^) ti* C^'We^aAQ^ C.C.as per rules. ^ctitkna staads dfaposcd of. jfor ad-intcrini xclicf afcso stands Vu^ -^- -^L Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge