IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.918 of 2010 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4221 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Ram Babu, S/O Shri Ram Naumi Ram, R/O Village & P.O. Dighwalia,P.S. Raghunathpur, District Siwan At Present Posted As The Circle Officer Cum Block Development Officer, Alinagar, Darbhanga. .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar In The Department Of Disaster Management, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Additional Commissioner, Disaster Management Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 6. The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 7. The Under Secretary To The Govt., Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 8. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga. 9. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Das Singh, AC to SC 12 ====================================================== 3 24-11-2011 Heard the parties. The appellant is aggrieved by an observation of the Writ Court that no interference is required with the order of suspension because there is no illegality in it. The submission is that the writ petition has been dismissed primarily in view of availability of alternative remedy of preferring an appeal under the relevant rules. Patna High Court LPA No.918 of 2010 (3) dt.24-11-2011 2 Hence, according to leaned counsel for the appellant, no prejudice should have been caused to the case of the appellant by observing that there is no illegality in the order of suspension. Considering the limited grievance raised on behalf of the appellant and considering the submission that he has already preferred a review/ appeal, we clarify that the observation that there is no illegality in the order of suspension passed in respect of the appellant on 10.2.2010 shall not be taken into consideration by the authority competent to decide the review/ appeal preferred by the appellant. With this observation, the appeal is disposed of. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)