DB Habeas Corpus Petition No.128/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No.128/2010 Anil Jain & Anr. Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 25/10/2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.KOTHARI Mr. Vinay Mathur, for the petitioner Mr. Rajendra Yadav, G.A., for the respondents Mr. Sharad Purohit, for the detenue-Kum. Arti Mr. Vidhyadhar Doodi, SHO, P.S. Manak Chowk, Jaipur *** This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the parents of Kumari Arti for her production as it was alleged that she had been abducted on or about 15th September, 2010 by Bhavesh Patel @ Pintu Patel and he has taken Kumari Arti from Jaipur to Gujarat in District Anand. Notices were issued with the direction to produce Kumari Arti before this Court and in pursuance of the aforesaid notices, Kumari Arti was produced before this Court on 22nd October, 2010. After the Police Party brought Kumari Arti and Pintu Patel from Anand District of the Gujarat, on the request made by the learned Counsel for the State accompanied by SHO, Police Station Manak Chowk, Jaipur, the case was taken up on 22nd October, 2010. With a view to afford an opportunity to Kumari Arti, who as per material on record including her marksheet of the Secondary School Examination, 2006, Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, date DB Habeas Corpus Petition No.128/2010 [2] of birth being 09/10/1990 is 20 years of age and accordingly, is a major. Despite the above, she was remanded to Nari Niketan at Jaipur with the direction to produce her before this Court so as to allow sufficient time to Kumari Arti to make up her mind as to what she wants to do and where she wants to go. Kumari Arti is also said to have entered into marriage with Pintu Patel and a Certificate to this effect has been sought to be produced before this Court, but authenticity of which is challenged inasmuch as the date of marriage is said to be 15th September, 2010, whereas on 15th September, 2010 both Kumari Arti and Pintu Patel were in Jaipur. However, we would not like to go into all the aforesaid questions as that is not the scope of this petition. Since the detenue Kumari Arti has been produced before this Court and as per the record, she is a major, nothing further is required to be done in this petition. Kumari Arti is free to proceed in the manner she likes. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [S.S.KOTHARI],J. [DALIP SINGH],J. FRBOHRA128Habeas CorpusPet10 25-10.doc