IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3493 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR RAI . Versus POONAM DEVI . ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent. The petitioner is stated to have filed Matrimonial Case No. 40 of 2006 against the sole respondent seeking divorce. Matrimonial matters deal with the issue of two human lives and deserve a different consideration from the routine litigation. The Court considers the pendency of the same for four long years as sufficient ground to give direction for its expeditious disposal without granting any frivolous and/or unnecessary adjournment to either party so that the suit itself may be concluded at the earliest. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)