xx $§§§$L£ EWQ? ’ BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.)_ w.P. 227 N0. “3&0 anew-2a! PETITIONERS 41 Fulmat, Wd/o. Pilalal Satnami, aged PLAINTIFFS about 65 years, R/o. Santkanwar Ram Ward, Bhatapara, Post, P.S. and Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) I 2. Kunjbihari Satnami, S/o. Pilalal @ Piladas, aged about 54 years,eR/o. Santkanwar Ram Ward, Bhatapara, Post, P.S. and Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. Qhumman Das Gehani, S/o. DEFENDANTS Khirumal, aged about 70 years, R/o. Station Ward, Bhatapara, Post, P.S. and Tahsil-Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The COllector, Raipur (C.G.) Anup‘ Kumar Agrawal, aged about 42 years Swarup Kumar Agrawal, aged about 39 years, Bharat Kumar Agrawal, aged about 37 years, No.3 to 5, S/o. Rammurti Agrawai, R/o. Nayapara Ward, In front of Main Post Ofhce Bhatapara, Post, P.S. and Tahsil-Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA gW glGj‘l COURT OF CHHATTISGARMT BILASPUR WP. (227w0. 360 OF 2011 PETITIONERS PLAINTIFFS Fulmat and another. Versus Ghumman Das Gehani and others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTiTUTlON OF H‘JDIA L§inqle Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Agarwal, J.) Present : Shri Raghvendra Pradhan,counse|forthe petitioners.‘ ORAL ORDER Kvr (Passed on 25‘“ day of January, 2011) Shri Pradhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise the grounds at appropriate time in appropriate proceedings. 2. Liberty is granted, as prayed for. 3. AccordinglY, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid iiberty. r w- r- Sdl— N.K. Agrawal Judge /