IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24588 of 2009 1. SOGARATH PASWAN, son of late Soman Paswan 2. Urmila Devi, wife of Sogarath Paswan 3. Fulen Paswan, son of Sogarath Paswan 4. Anil Paswan, son of Sogarath Paswan 5. Ratilal Paswan, son of Sogarath Paswan 6. Bharkaliya Devi, daughter of Sogarath Paswan All residents of village-Hirniay, P.S.-Rosera, District-Samastipur---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Two of the offences are non-bailable. For that it is said that Ram Sogarath Paswan ordered, thereupon all the accused persons including petitioners assaulted the informant by means of slaps and lathi. Fulen Paswan has been specifically alleged for causing assault by means of the blunt end of Khanti while Ratilal has been alleged for causing assault by brick. Co-accused Fulen Mahto has been alleged for snatching Rs.3,000/- cash, a wrist watch and a torch which is only a super-addition due to enmity prevailing from earlier as a case was filed on behalf of petitioner no.1 against the members of the informant party including offences under section 353 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(1) ( x) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Injuries are opined simple in nature. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of - 2 - the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur, in connection with Rosera P.S. case no.71 of 2009 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )