fi: HI&H COURT OF CHHATTTS6ARH AT BILA9?UR W. P. (5) No. 1432 of2007 Smt Sialini Singh D/o of Siri K.S. Pendro, aged about 50 years, R/o Teachers Colony Pasan, Korba, Distt- Versus 1. State of C.&. - Throuqh-The Secretary, Oepartment of Tribal Wetfare, Mantralaya &.K.S. Shawcin Raipur (C.6.) 2. Commissioner, Triba! Weifare Department, Ravi Shonkar University Campus, ftaipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Welfare Department Cottectorate Campus, Korba (C.6.) 4. Principal ©overnmentHigher &condary School, Paaan, Korba (c.e.) >irg!e Bench; Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. '. Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawye.r for the State/respondents. ORbER (Passed on this 13th &cy of AAarch, 2007) 1. Learned counset appearing for the petitioner submits that the petiti'oner is working as Assistant Teacher. The petitioner B. Ed. Examination certificate on 23.5.1994, on his own expenses. 2. Learned counsel appearing for +he petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher, wrfio obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenas is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to iearned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of yashwant Corporatson, Durg and another {20Q6 Cd) AAPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. teunicipal Corporation, Durg cnd another (Sjpra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the ssh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of !aw involved in the present case are square!y covered by decision of fnis Court in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bhapadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporotion, Qvsy and another (Supra), to which learned counssl appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by learned counse! appearing for the r-^t^l petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is attowed in terms of +he order pas-sed in the case of Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verificationof the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own e>qienses as per the circuiars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge <: ^hash