IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1338 of 2007() ------------------------- CRRP.53/2005 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC)-1 MANJERI MC.50/2003 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MALAPPURAM .................... PETITIONER(S): REVISION PETITIONER ---------------------------------- 1. PATHUR KUNHIMOHAMMED, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMAD HAJI, VARIATH HOUSE, THOZHANUR P.O., RANDATHANI POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.MUJEEB RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. SARA, D/0 KATTIKULANGARA ABU HAJI, KATTIKULANGARA HOUSE, CHENGOTTUR P.O MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. P.GOPINATHAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 1338 of 2007() APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE -A : COPY OF THE ORDER IN M.C. MO.50/2003 PASSED BY J.F.C.M. COURT, MALAPPURAM ANNEXURE -B : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.11.2006 IN CRL.R.P.NO.53/2005 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, (ADHOC-1), MANJERI //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sou. K. HEMA, J ---------------------- Crl.M.C.No.1338 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated 19th August, 2011 O R D E R This Crl.M.C was filed as early as on 24.4.2007. Even after expiry of about four years, steps were not taken. Therefore on 17.3.2010, an order was passed by this court as follows: “Take steps in four days failing which this petition shall stand dismissed”. 2. Several postings are seen given after the said order, over a period of more than one year. On 17.7.2011, another bench of this court passed the following order: “This is an application to review the order dated 17.3.2010. Place this matter before Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema, who has passed the order.” 3. This case was posted before this bench and it was found that no petition for review was filed. Therefore an order was passed to verify whether a petition is filed for review. Registry has verified and found that petition to review is not received. 4. When this case is called today, there is no representation for petitioner. In the above circumstances, as per order dated 17.3.2010 this Crl.M.C stands dismissed. Communicate this order to the court below. Sd/-, K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou. // True copy //