HI§E€ €GURT $F CHH&TTHSGARH aILA$PUR €3nM.PJ€m 9% Qi' 206‘? FETETIGE VNDER $ECTEOP€ 4-82 a}? Ci“.¥.€§. Aypearance: Shri Ankit Pandey, Counsel for the p€ti1i0nen Shri SuSh€1 Duhey, Gavt. Advecatf: far t‘mi Siam on advanca copy. GRAL GRDER {04.07.20G'?} $UP€EL KUMAR $§NHA, J. Haai‘d mi afimissiou. If. appears that an int€r€m mainfm‘iance in the hum of Rs.400/- was gTzmtad ‘to the wifaby ‘rha concerned Magigfrats against which, the. crimina1 Rm’ision wa$ fHed bafore fhe Sessiims Judge, which. was akin mjecttif}. Léiarn ed counsel for thf: pa‘fitim‘ler argues that the amount 0f 'mtarhn mainfenance iS not in accn'i‘dance Wi‘rl‘i law. I have g0n€ fhrmlgh the impugned m‘dai‘s of fh€ two courts below. Thaw appaars to be no €1l€ga1ity in such ordora passod by the courts below. Tho provisionS of sacfjon 125 of Cr.P.C. am enacteii for social juStico a‘od eSpecially to profacf the. womon anrl children as also the old and infirm poor parents and falls Within tho constitutional swaap of Articlr: l. (Q) reinforcad by Alticle 3§ of the: Conatitution. The provision givas afloat 1:0 natural and fundamental AEFLI€A§Ti Shaifyat Khém, 3/0 Muhammaci PETITIONER Khan, aged about 45 years; occupafion Business, msident of Gram Jahara Tola, Thalia Lohara Distt. KabirDham (C.G.) ‘. Versus EGE—&P?LE€ABET;’ Shaidmmisha danghier of Salim RESFGNDEHT Khan, agcd aboui’ 4G years, rcsic‘wnt of Gram Jahara Tola, Thana Lohara District Kai'air Dham {C.G.) ‘2 CI‘.M.P. N0. 96 £2007 duiy of a man to maintain his: Wi'Fr—t, Childmn and pa‘rentg $0 hng a<. In Vi-EW of the above: and aka in viii—w of Ls‘heiaw, fhm‘e is no merit in tha pefjfion. @ tha moh‘on stage ifseh". thfiy are unable To maintain thamsaWes. fhe: contmlts 01" {he orders passai} by the com [Rao/ ThE pefiiion . is net worth ESion —~-‘\J and it is dismiSsed at Sd/- SUNIL KUMAR S Judge /