IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22162 of 2009 SMT.LEELA SINHA @ LILAWATI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI BINOD KUMAR @ BINOD KUMAR SINGH @ TULSI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MOLDIAR TOLA, MOKAMA, P.S. MOKAMA, DISTT- PATNA. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. ROJI KUMARI, WIFE OF ALOK PRIYA AND DAUGHTER OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAITPUR, P.S. BARAHIA, DISTT. LAKHISARAI. ----------- 6. 28.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State and the informant who has appeared in compliance of the orders of this Court dated 7.10.2009. 2. Earlier attempt of the petitioner for grant of bail in the event of arrest in the instant case was refused by this Court under order dated 30.4.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No.43349 of 2008 with direction to surrender in the court below within four weeks and apply for regular bail. By filing the present petition, prayer is to reconsider the earlier order dated 30.4.2009 and admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest on the ground that on the earlier occasion, the copy of the complaint petition filed earlier by the informant RoJi Kumari herself was not perused by this Court as the same was not appended with the earlier - 2 - Cr. Misc. application. 3. It is submitted with reference to the statement made in the earlier complaint that the allegation that the petitioner administered poison to the informant/complainant RoJi Kumari does not appear to be true in view of the statement set out in the complaint as after lodging the complaint the informant/complainant went to her parents house and petitioner had no occasion to administer poison to the informant/complainant at her parents house and the allegations set out in the F.I.R. that petitioner administered poison to the informant is wholly false. Such submission has been noticed only for being rejected as it was for the petitioner to have annexed the copy of the complaint while filing the earlier petition but having not annexed the copy of the complaint and argued the matter on the basis of the statements made in the F.I.R. and the court having taken notice of the contents of the F.I.R. and rejected the prayer for grant of bail in the event of arrest on the earlier occasion under order - 3 - N.H./ dated 30.4.2009 with direction to the petitioner to surrender in the court below within four weeks and apply for regular bail, the petitioner having not obeyed the direction of this Court and taken another chance, I am not inclined to reconsider the matter and the application is accordingly rejected with direction to the petitioner to surrender forthwith. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)