THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.11845 of 2006 Dated: 15.06.2006 Between: Ch. Ravindra, S/o Ch.M. Rao, Torruru, Junior Assistant, APSRTC, Warangal District. .... PETITIONER AND APSRTC,rep. by the Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.11845 of 2006 Order: The petitioner is working as a Junior Assistant in the respondent-Corporation at Torruru Depot. While so, respondent No.3 passed orders dated 06.04.2006 transferring the petitioner to Asifabad Depot in Adilabad District, on the ground of long standing. Since his wife is working as a School Assistant at Mataid village, Warangal District, the petitioner having regard to the orders issued in Circular dated 26.04.1984, made a representation dated 28.04.2006 to respondent No.2 requesting him to cancel the said transfer orders and retain him in the present Depot. But, the respondents-Corporation have not taken any action thereon so far. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. According to the petitioner, his wife is working as a School Assistant at Mataid village, Warangal District, and having regard to the orders issued by the respondents-Corporation in Circular dated 26.04.1984, which states that when both wife and husband are employees, they have to be placed at a particular place, the petitioner made a representation dated 28.04.2004 for his retention at the present place, where his wife is also working, in terms of the Circular, but the respondents- Corporation even though passed the transfer order on 06.04.2006, they have not passed any orders on his representation till date, and the same is still pending consideration before the respondents-Corporation. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, and having regard to the fact that the representation dated 28.04.2006 is still pending consideration by the respondents-Corporation, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondents-Corporation are directed to consider the representation dated 28.04.2006 of the petitioner for his retention at the present place in the light of its Circular dated 26.04.1984, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 15.06.2006 Nsr/Ksr