IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2009 SRI DEVI BHUMIKA VETAL DEVASTHAN, PALYEM, PERNEM THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY MR. MADAN JAIRAM PARAB AND 5 O ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE SECRETARY(REVENUE) AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. P. S. Lotlikar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 29th January, 2009 P.C. Heard. 2. This writ petition has been preferred against the order passed by the Government on 29.09.2008 whereby it dissolved the Managing Committee of Sri Devi Bhumika Vetal Devasthan, Paliyem. The main contention of the petitioner is that the Government did not hear them before passing the order dated 14.01.2009. 3. Notice of this petition was issued to the respondents. 4. The respondents/State has appeared. It is fairly conceded by the respondents' counsel that if at all, the Court feels that hearing was not given to the petitioner when the order dated 14.01.2009 was passed, the respondent is ready to give such hearing to the petitioner. In view of this submission the order passed by the Government on 14.01.2009 is set aside and the matter stands remanded back to the Government with a direction that the Government should give notice to the petitioner to show cause as to why the report of Mamlatdar should not be accepted. It is after giving this notice of hearing to the petitioner, the Government may take decision on merits, as deemed fit and in accordance with law. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. lh/.