IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5268 of 2009 DINESH KUMAR SHUKLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : GP 18 ------ 2. 24.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The claim in this writ application is for the difference of arrears of salary of the I.Sc. trained pay scale to the petitioner with effect from 1.4.1985 but has been given from 31.5.1991 and to pay arrears salary of B.Sc. trained pay scale from 1.4.1991 to 1996. Learned Counsel for the State has no objection to the disposal of this writ application for consideration of the claims by the respondents after verification of records in terms of the order dated 15.11.2006 in CWJC No. 15325 of 2005. However it is observed that it would be open for the respondents to satisfy themselves that the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid order and in the event that they come to the conclusion that the case of the petitioner is different they shall be at liberty to do so but only after passing a reasoned and speaking order on the ground of difference for which the benefits of the aforesaid order cannot be given to the petitioner within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)