Civil Revision No. 6650 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6650 of 2010 Date of Decision: 11.10.2010 Sushil Kumar Jain …Petitioner Versus Sanjit Kumar and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Harsh Aggawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The landlord is aggrieved against the impugned order dated 13.9.2010, passed by the Rent Controller, Faridkot, whereby the other legal representatives of the deceased/tenant Puran Chand were allowed to be impleaded as respondents to the eviction petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this exercise was undertaken by the respondents, at a very belated stage, only to cause delay in culmination of the proceedings. He has further submitted that the entire evidence of the landlord has been concluded and the last opportunity was granted to two legal representatives of the tenant, when the application was filed by another legal representative. He has further submitted that this has been done only to defeat the rights of the landlord to have an early decision of the eviction petition. I find no infirmity in the impugned order dated 13.9.2010, Civil Revision No. 6650 of 2010 2 passed by the Rent Controller, Faridkot, as other legal representative of the tenant ought to have been given an opportunity to defend the eviction petition. However, to allay the apprehension of the petitioner/landlord that this will delay the culmination of the eviction proceedings, the Rent Controller is directed to decide the eviction petition within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the observations made above, the present revision petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge October 11, 2010 “DK”