i A^ <?t^%.a^M! r^ 'etitioners ll writ PeSition (C) Ho. S031of2007 1. Mohan Lal S/o Vishnu Prasad Chandrakar, Aged about 55 years 2. Teieshwar @ Chhotu Chandrakar S/o Mohan Lal Chandrakar Ased about 26 years 3. • Digeshwar S/'o Mohan Lal Chandrakar Aged about 30 years 4. Narendra S/o Mohan Lal Chandrakar, 3QSO QDOUI \5^ ySafS 5. Smt. Ram Pyari VVidow of Vishnu Prasad Chandrakar, aged about 78 year-s Al! resident of villacie Kurud, Tahsi! Kunjd, District - D'namtari (C.G.) sDonff Pi?s!ntif?<s: Present: 1. Karmchand Sundrani S/o Arhtma! Sundranj Aged about 49 years 2. Dr. Baijeet Slngh Kukreja S/o Niranjan Singh Kukreja aged about 65 yeare Both resjdent of vil!age Gobra Naya para Razim, Disirict Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Ku. Rati Bai Chandrakar D/o Bhag'A'at Chandrakar aged about 23 years 4. Smt. Smita Bai Chandrakar D/o Bhagwat C'nandrakar aged about 26 years Both through Bhagv/at Chandrakar S/o Rampyare Chandrakar R/o Kurmipara Azad C'nowk Kurud Tahsil District Dhamtari (C.G.). t No.8 5. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Dhamtari. District Dhamtari (C.G.) Writ Petition und-erArticle 227 ofthe Constitution.ofjndia Shri Vishnu Koshta, counsei for the petittoners. ^ ^fr-'assed QH 10' The respondents No. 1 and 2 filed a Civii Suit before the Civil Judge for possession and permanent injunction wherein the tempo'rary Injunction was granted by order dated 21 Februaty, 2007. Aggrieved by the same the defendants flied an appeai which 'was aiso dismissed -after due consideration by order dated 14-09-2007 confirming the ordsr ^}.. trial Court. Aggrieved by the same the defendants/petitioners have approached this Court. Matter is pending before the triai Court. However, both the Courts below have found it a fit case and granted temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiffe. Petitioners pray that the said order may be reversed. This Court has taken into consideration the power of judicial revlew under ArticEe 227 of ths Constitution. ! am of the considered oplniors that the inferim injunction has been granted by the both the Courts after consldering the facts and circumstances ofthe case. Thus looking to the stage of the case whlch is pending before She Court beiow, this Court/of the opinion that no interference is warranted with the impugned order unde.r Article 227 of the Constitution of india. Accordingiy the petition is dismissed. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice ffVn'h-