C.W.P. No. 11495 of 2011 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 11495 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 6,2011 Amit Ohri ................................................. Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. A.P.Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Mr. Puneet Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant District Attorney Class-III post, under the Sportsman Category. In pursuance to the selection process, Gagan Goklaney was selected. He was not allowed to join on the ground that as per eligibility criteria for the sports category he was not having 'C' Grade Certificate. A C.W.P. No. 10205 C.W.P. No. 11495 of 2011 [ 2 ] of 2010 was filed by Gagan Goklaney which was disposed of by giving a direction to the competent authority to examine the case of Gagan Goklaney in light of the recruitment rules and the guidelines issued for appointment to the post of Assistant District Attorney Class III Post under Sports category in accordance with law. Till date, no decision has been taken by the competent authority and the post is lying vacant. The petitioner has made a representation dated 14.6.2011 (Annexure P-8) to respondent No.1 wherein he has stated that his sports gradation certificate of 'C' Grade with one first to third position in state level championship supersedes Mr. Gagan Goklaney 'C' Grade certificate of representation of district in state level champion, therefore, he is eligible to be appointed. The writ petition is disposed of by giving a direction to respondent No.1 to pass a speaking order on the representation (Annexure P-8) made by the petitioner within a period of four weeks. 6.7.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE