IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 384 of 2002 (M/B) Avinash Sharma S/o Sri Om Prakash Sharma, R/o Mohalla Devtan, Jwalapur, District Haridwar. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. Nagar Palika Parishad, through Adhishasi Adhikari, Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar. 2. Adhishasi Adhikari, Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar. 3. Collector, Haridwar/ Administrator, Nagar Palika Parishad. 4. Ankush Sharma S/o Sri Vashudev Sharma R/o Gori Shankar Ashram, Haridwar. …….. Respondents Mr. D. Barthwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 3. None for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. D. Barthwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Alok Singh, Senior Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. D. Barthwal, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 12.07.2006 12.07.2006 G