- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.5804 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.1556 OF 2004 Ram Dnyanoba Kabnure ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Arfan Sait Advocate (appointed) for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for State ... WITH CRI.APPLICATION NO.5640 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO.1508 OF 2004 Mani Ayyaswami Acharya ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Arfan Sait Advocate (appointed) for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for State ... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 7, 2006 DATE : MARCH 7, 2006 DATE : MARCH 7, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. These two applications have been filed by two different accused for condonation of delay. Both - 2 - these appeals arise out of common judgment and order of conviction. Since from the date of conviction, the accused are in jail and therefore, the delay is condoned in both the applications. Both the appeals are admitted. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]