: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.201 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.201 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.201 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.1075 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.1075 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.1075 OF 2008 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,Raigad ...Applicant V/s. Ankush Mahadeo Gaikar & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Ramesh K. Cheulkar, Advocate, for the Applicant. Mr.T.J. Mendon, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 17TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 17TH MARCH, 2008. DATE : 17TH MARCH, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate appearing for the applicant and Advocate for the 1st respondent. Office noting shows that private notice is served to the 2nd respondent. 2. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]