^ " ?l " ^-* -3 ^•i) ^i:^':. L^L.^ M (f j^^-y^L- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. (Sl No. 1200f?- PETITIONERS ...^ -M/ ~w/ /^ ^•' J'-' .-'• ^/ ^.d^ \0^ ^^"^" G^ ^ ^ A^" ^ w ^- RESPONDENT'S ^ Smt. Shakun Manikpuri, W/o. Shri Ravidas Manikpuri, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girl's Middle School - Bankisite, Block - Katghora, Distt. - Korba(C.G.) Bhuneshwar Datta Mishra, S/o. Shri Bhikhar Datta Mishra, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Abhaypur, Janshiksha Kendra Bhelwadih, Block - Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education / Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-) ,2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District- Korba (C.G.) ^3. District Education Officer, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Katghora, Distt. -Korba VERSUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS. DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. f^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIb^SPUR W. P.rS) No. 77 of 2007 Petitioners : Smt. Manju Shrivastava and cnother Versus Respondtmts : Stoite of Chhatti^arh and others w. p.rs^ No. 80 of 2007 Petitiorters : Ramkrishna Pcndey and another Versus ftespondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and o+hers And W P.rS) No. 83 of 2007 Petitroners : Smt. Shakun Manilqauri and cnother Versus Respondents : Staite of Chhatt-isgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. Anil Singh Ra^»ut,Advocate for ihe petitioner(s). Mr. ^rvind Dubey, Panel kwyer for -Hie respondents/State. ORbER (Possed on this 16th Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners os well as for the Starte/re^ondents jointly aibmit thot the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and o+hers v& Stata 6ovemment of Chhattisgarh A others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of tow involved is also the same. 2. In view of the ofcove stated submissions made by feomed counsel for the part'ies, these petitions are allow»d in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by -tiijs Court in W.P. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (SushiJ Tm»ari and others vs. State fiovemment of Chhatf-isgarh A others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of 'this order be placed on record in other connected writ I. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge