* 100 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)12490/2009 S P SAKUJA Petitioner Through; IVIr. IVIunendra Kr. Singh and IVIr. A.K. Singh,Advocates for the petitioner. versus COMIVIISSIONEROF POLICEAND ANR Respondent Through: Mr. N. Waziri, StandingCounsel with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER % 15.10.2009 Learned counsel for the respondents has produced original file before the Court. The photographs show that the shop is provided with a rollingshutters and it is wrongly recorded in the impugnedorder that the doors have not been provided with a rollingshutter. It is further stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the other statements made in the impugned order passed by the Joint Commissionerare incorrect and the Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified J > ^ wiringis completelyconcealed. In view of the factthatthe impugnedorder incorrectly records that the rolling shutter was not provided^ it will be appropriateif the respondentscarry out fresh inspectiontoday itself. In case concealedelectricalwiring has been provided and the petitioner has compliedwith statutoryprovisions,temporarylicensewill be issued in the evening or by tomorrow morning. ^ With the aforesaid observations, writ petition is disposed of. Dasti to counsel for the parties under the signature of Court Master. OCTOBER 15,2009 Ag SANJIV KHANNA,J