{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8677 OF 2010 Abhimanue s/o Shankaryya Kalyan Petitioner Versus The Dean, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad & others Respondents None for the petitioner Mr. K.G.Patil, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE : 18 th November, 2010 PER COURT: 1 When the matter was called out in the morning session, none appeared for the petitioner. On second call also, non appears for the petitioner. 2 By way of present petition, the petitioner claims compassionate appointment on the ground that petitioner’s father and mother were working with Respondents. It is the contention of the petitioner that other similarly circumstanced persons, whose parents were working with respondents, have been granted compassionate appointment and as such, the petitioner is also entitled for the same. {2} 3 In the reply filed on behalf of respondents, it is categorically stated that in view of the policy of the Government, it is not permissible to appoint wards of the retired Class-IV employees, except in case of those, who have retired on medical ground. 4 Insofar as the other contention of the petitioner regarding wards of other employees being employed, it has been categorically stated that some of such appointments were made somewhere in the year 1990. It is, however, categorically stated that after 1990, no such appointments have been made by the respondents. In that view of the matter, no merit is found in the petition. 5 Writ Petition stands dismissed. K.K.TATED B.R.GAVAI JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp867710