BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15147 of 2011 LATHA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C-5, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI. (CRIME NO.2258 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.GANESAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition for Charging of Exorbitant Interest Act in Crime No.2258 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. She has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard Mr.A.Ganesan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that due to monery dispute, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and she is an innocent person and she did not commit any crime as stated in the complaint. He would also submit in his argument that she is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would requet for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioners. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is a woman, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, concerned on executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai , and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation and she is directed not to indulge in similar crime in future. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 22/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C-5, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. A.GANESAN Advocate SR.No.41001 rl/6c – 24.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15147 of 2011 Date :22/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/