IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 2949 of 1990 Date of Decision: 25.11.2010. Dalip Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. V.K.Jindal, Addl. AG, Punjab for the respondent-State. NAWAB SINGH.J.(ORAL) By filing this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, Dalip Singh - petitioner has challenged the order dated April 27th, 1989 (Annexures P/5) passed by the Secretary to Government, Punjab, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, and the order dated August 29th, 1989 (Annexure P/9), vide which his representation was rejected by the Government. Learned State counsel has stated that since the petitioner has retired on January 31st, 1997 on attaining the age of superannuation, no cause of action survives. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the present petition be dismissed as infructuous. It is ordered accordingly. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 25.11.2010. som