-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5529 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 5529 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 5529 OF 2003 Bhimrao Dhondiba Sarvagod & Anr... Petitioners. Versus Bismilla Nazir Inamdar & Ors... ... Respondents. Mr. R. V. More for the Petitioners. Mr. P. B. Shah for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2005. : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2005. : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. There is no dispute that the injunction was granted by the trial court, which was reversed by the appellate court. However, in the present writ petition, this court after considering the rival contentions, granted status quo on 6th August, 2003. This status quo order is in operation since then. In the interest of justice and looking to the nature of the suit filed for injunction, the status quo order to continue till the decision of the suit. This workable -: 2 :- order has a foundation that the trial court will expedite the hearing of the suit. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)