-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.9359 of 2007 Shri Balkrishna Ramchandra Kolhe and others ..Petitioners vs. Sou.Sharada Ashokrao Mahale and others ..Respondents Miss Leena Patil i/b Shri M.S.Karnik for petitioners. Shri P.S.Dani for respondent nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 23rd January, 2008 23rd January, 2008 23rd January, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The order of the Trial Court below Exh.73 in Reg.Civil Suit No.100 of 2003 read as a whole does not rule out and in fact permits exhibition of the documents which are produced on record. Thus, all documents shall be exhibited but the parties will have to prove their contents in accordance with law is the ultimate conclusion in the impugned order. 2. Notice was issued only because an apprehension was expressed by Miss Patil that despite these observations the Trial Court is not allowing the documents to be exhibited and in fact they are not marked as such. Both sides -2- do not dispute that the documents have to be marked as such. If that is not already done, then, the Trial Court shall mark them as Exhibit, but, merely because they are exhibited does not mean that their contents are proved. Both sides agree that the contents will have to be proved in accordance with law. With such clarification the petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)