IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2008 / 29TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 30878 of 2008(A) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------------- 1. FENU K.A., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.K.S.ABDUL AZEEZ, P.D.ROAD, T&R CROSS ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM. 2. SHINSHA.S., AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SHAMSULHUQ, “SHAH MANZIL”, MUTTAKKAVU, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM. 3. SHABIR.N.S., AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.N.A.SEETHI, “NAMBITUNNILATH HOUSE”, P.O.MATHILAKAM, PUTHIYAKAVU, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, UTY OF CLT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI, J. =============== W.P.(C).No.30878 of 2008 - A =============================== Dated this the 21st day of October, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners have completed B.Tech Course from the MES Engineering College, Kuttippuram, affiliated to the University of Calicut. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by the 1st petitioner in two papers, 2nd petitioner in four papers and the 3rd petitioner in two papers in the 4th Semester Examination, they had applied for revaluation. They are aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the B.Tech Examination. Their application for revaluation is pending before the respondent. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioners in relation to the B.Tech Examination, December 2007, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six W.P.(C).No.30878 of 2008 - A 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the applications for revaluation are in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, JUDGE. bkn/-