1 C.A. 13329/2009 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13329/2009 PRKASH S/O PUNDLIK DOIWAD AND ANOTHER VS. DIGAMBAR S/O VITTHAL HOKARNE AND OTHERS Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 18th July, 2011. Mr. G.O. Wattamwar h/f Mr. S.G. Rudrawar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. G.N. Choncholkar, advocate for respondent No.1. 1. Heard. 2. The applicants’ apprehension at this interim stage is that the respondents are taking advantage of the impugned judgment passed by learned District Judge and they would initiate construction of the disputed road and thereby obstruct his right to use the same as road. To this, Shri Chincholikar the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, on instructions, stated that his client has no intention to erect any construction on the area occupied by disputed road. In view of this statement, the application is not pressed. I hope that the respondents shall not obstruct the appellants’ user of the disputed 2 C.A. 13329/2009 area as road, till disposal of second appeal. 3. C.A. disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE,J.] ts k/2011/July18/ca13329.09