tlNGLE BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION fC) N0. ^ t9 / 2011 PETITIONER: ^"" ^<^ J^--""^' Ganesh Prasad Agrawal S/o Late Jagatram Agrawal about 46 years, R/o. Ambikapur Road, Pathalgaon, Tahsil, Pathalgaon, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :f. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2." The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh(C.G.) 3. Deputy, Divisional Forest Officer, Lailunga, Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh(C.G.) 4. Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Lailunga, S'. Forest Range Officer, Kapu Range, Forest Division Lailunga. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTIC /^ „ 1 "^^y^'^^':^ ^' ^i • ''•^.siy' 'V ^f: '^ ^//^ H1GHCOURTQFCHHATTISGARH:BILASPUR PETITIONER Gowri WRIT PETITION (C) N0.5619 OF 2011 Ganesh Prasad Agrawal Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passedonthis21stdayofSeptember, 2011) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State fairly submits that if the applications dated 3-3-2011 (Annexure - P/9) and 9-3-2011 (Annexure ~ P/11) are pending consideration before the authorities concerned, the same shall be considered and decided, 'n accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Learned counsel further submits that in the meantime, no action in respect of the confiscation of the vehicle in dispute be taken. 2. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge