IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 11169 of 2006 TAPESHWAR PRASAD MISHRA, S/o Late Ganesh Prasad Mishra, Resident of Village- Hissinabad Sanghat Mohalla P.O. Japala, District – Palamu (Jharkhand). ....... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Aurangabad (Bihar). ............. Respondents ----------- 2 08.04.2011 Sri Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition almost all the grievances have already been redressed. However, he submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with an indication that if still some grievances exist the petitioner may file representation before respondent no. 3/Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Aurangabad (Bihar). Smt. Shalini Raut, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate No. 3 has got no objection. In view of stand taken by the parties the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as indicated above and if such representation is filed it is expected that same will be examined in accordance with law and disposed of preferably within three months from the date of filing of such representation. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)