1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2706 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2019 OF 2008 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2500 OF 2008 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2021 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 9, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Vaspar Fisher Limited, Mumbai – 92 ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Subramanian with Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 26th JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. Perused the affidavit in support of both the Notices of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavits, both the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order are to costs. 2. Office objections, if any are over-ruled. Registry is directed to register both the appeals. By consent of parties, both the appeals are taken up for hearing. 3. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Since both the appeals are against the order of order, we see no substantial question of law involved in these appeals. Both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)