1 C.A.NO. 2021/09. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2021 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1521 OF 2004. Manisha @ Baidu d/o Ashruba Jadhav ...Applicant. VERSUS Satyanarayan s/o Gangabhishan Bhakkad ...Respondent. ... Mr.M.A.Tandale,Advocate for the applicant. Mr.M.M.Patil ( Beedkar), Advocate for respondent. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 29th September, 2009. COURT’S ORDER: 1. The application seeks payment of the amount which the appellant had deposited after admission of the appeal. The respondent No.1/claimant is entitled to this amount even prior to disposal of 2 C.A.NO. 2021/09. the appeal mainly because the main question in this appeal is as to who is liable to pay the compensation? Whether it is the appellant here or the respondent No.3-Insurance Company. If the appellant succeeds in getting absolved, it would be the respondent No.3-Insurance Company, who would be liable to compensate the respondent No. 1/the claimant. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) of this application. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp