1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1848/1997 Arun Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. DATE OF ORDER :: 06.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr.PP Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr.Vinay Jain, for the respondent No.2 By this petition for writ following directions are sought by the petitioner :- “(a)- the respondents may kindly be directed to make payment of the salary to the petitioner in the regular pay scale of the post of Class IV employee / Security Guard from the date of his initial appointment and the arrears of the salary may be paid to the petitioner alongwith interest @ 24% per annum. (b)- the respondents may kindly be directed to regularise the services of the petitioner on the post of Class IV employee / Security Guard from the date of his initial appointment with all consequential benefits and reliefs as if he was never denied the same. (c)- the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to declare that the petitioner is an employee of the respondent No.2 and the respondent No.2 is the employer of the petitioner. (d)- any other appropriate writ, order or direction which is found just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2 At the threshold, it is stated by the learned counsel for the respondent Bank that as a matter of fact, the petitioner is no more working with the Bank from last about a decade and as such, whatever relief claimed by the petitioner in no way can be accorded. The fact regarding non-continuation of the petitioner in service has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner because of want of knowledge. In view of the statement given by the learned counsel for the respondent that the petitioner is not working in the Bank, no direction can be given regarding grant of his regularisation in service or regarding grant of regular pay-scale as applicable to the post of Security Guard working with the Bank. The petition for writ is dismissed as having become infructuous. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. rm/