IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15556 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.03.2011 Ram Sarup ....Petitioner versus The Chief Scientist, Haryana State Remote Sensing Application Centre (HARSAC), HAU Campus, Hissar and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Jaiveer Chandail, Advocate, for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) There is no representation for the petitioner. Counsel for the first respondent is present. The petitioner claimed that he was working as a Clerk in the first respondent's office and that he was entitled to be regularized. The issue of regularization will be governed through statutory rules and the manner provided by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka Versus Uma Devi and others-2006(4) SCC 1. Any right of the petitioner will be governed by the said decision. The writ petition is disposed of in the above said Civil Writ Petition No.15556 of 1989 (O&M) - 2 - manner and leaving it to the appropriate authority to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law in the light of the above said judgment. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 18.03.2011 sanjeev