IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24616 of 2008 Between: Rachmalla Venkat Swamy, S/o. Late Pochaiah, R/o. Siddanthi, Shamshabad, Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Cyberabad Police Limits, Gachi Bowli, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Station House Officer, Shamshabad Police Station, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Sir Syed Bin Aslam, S/o. late Asam Bin Salah, R/o. 23-3-118, Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Abood Bin Aslam, S/o. Asam Bin Salah, R/o. 23-643/1, Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing to the Respondents No.1 and 2, to investigate into the matter with regard to the complaint made by the petitioner, dated 5-8-2008 made to the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, pertaining to the forgery committed by Respondents No.3 and 4 in respect of his signature and his late brother R. Sailoo Signature on the Registered Sale Deed Document NO.s 928 and 929 of 1998, dated 10-8-1998, registered in the Office of the Sub-Registrar, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District and take appropriate legal necessary action in the matter. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.SURYA KARAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.24616 of 2008 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though he had sent his complaint to the respondents 1 and 2 by way of Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due on 05.08.2008, the same is not being registered and investigated into by the official respondents. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has placed before this Court a copy of the First Information Report in Crime No.15, registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by the petitioner, to show that the complaint lodged by the petitioner has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC. In view of the same, nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. The writ petition is, accordingly, closed. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 25.11.2008 v v