IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 26TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 27528 of 2007(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BEST ARTS AND SPORTS CLUB, NAVODAYA, NORTH MILLUMPADY, THENGODE P.O., KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682030 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT ANI K.A. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KAKKANAD. 4. FATHER ANTONY KARAYIL, CARMELITE OF MARY IMMACULATOR, KARAKKAMURI ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682011. 5. M/S FRAGUS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, HIG 5, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 27528 OF 2007 B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th September, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, a Club, complains that the 4th respondent is developing some land on the strength of an order passed by the 1st respondent in his favour under the Land Utilisation Order. In my view, the petitioner is a stranger and none of its rights are affected. Be that as it may, the Land Utilisation Order itself provides for alternate remedies. In view of this, I do not find any ground to entertain this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-