IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11220 of 2005. 1.Md.Yashin Khan son of Late Md.Salim Khan. Resident of Mohalla Nasariganj, Pathantoli, P.O.Bataganj, P.S.Danapur District Patna….Petitioner. Versus 1.The State Of Bihar. 2.The Secretary, Department of Primary, Secondary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Deputy Secretary to the Govt., Deptt. Of Primary, Secondary and Adult Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.The Director, Man Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 3 29.06.2011 Heard the parties. Petitioner has made a prayer for issuance of direction to the respondents to absorb his services as clerk cum-typist in view of the fact that the appointment of the petitioner has been found valid/regular by duly constituted committed to ascertain the persons who were regular employees of non-formal/adult education, Bihar. In the year 1993, the Adult Education was abolished and the services of the employees who were on ad hoc basis under the Adult Education Programme were terminated but those employees, including the petitioner, who were appointed by following the due process, i.e. after advertisement, interview etc. were allowed to continue. In April 2001, the Government had taken a policy decision to abolish the Adult Education. Accordingly, the services of the persons who were terminated filed several writ petitions, including C.W.J.C.No. 13009 of 2001. The petitioner also challenged his order of termination in the present case. During the pendency of the writ petition, the Government, vide Memo No. 425 dated 10th February 2006 (Annexure-A to the counter affidavit) has taken a decision to reinstate all the retrenched persons, including he petitioner who were appointed in different departments. Name of petitioner is at Sl. No. 24 in the aforesaid letter and, hence, there is nothing left to be decided in the writ petition and the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as being infructuous. Jay/ ( Shivaji Pandey,J.)