(1) wp9638-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9638 OF 2011 Rameshsingh Amarsingh Rathod PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. G.N. Chincholkar, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for Respondent No. 2. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 19th DECEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. The learned Divisional Commissioner has given sound and cogent reasons as to why part of the petitioner's objection has been accepted and the rest of the objection has been rejected. The scope of interference in such matters in our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is very limited. The Court does not possess the expertise to examine the correctness or otherwise of the decisions taken by the District Administration regarding the homogeneity of the Constituency, regarding equitable distribution of the voters (2) wp9638-11 amongst the various constituencies, etc. 2. In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp9638-11