IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.238 OF 2009 Gulab Abdul Rahim Patwegar ...Applicant Versus Badasha Iman Patwegar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Abhijit Adagule for the Applicant. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 26th JUNE, 2009. P.C. : Heard, Mr. Adagule, learned Counsel for the Applicant. 2. By the impugned order passed under section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the learned Member, M.A.C.T., Kolhapur, has corrected the arithmetical mistake. The learned Counsel for the Applicant does not dispute the arithmetical mistake. He only submits that already similar application was preferred and the same was dismissed for default and therefore, the present application is not maintainable. Since, the previous application was not decided on merits, I do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the Applicant, so as to exercise my jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Civil Revision Application is, accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)