IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.429 of 2010 MUNNA CHOUHAN, Son of Kailash Chouhan, R/o Tarapar, P.S. Ariari, District Sheikhpura ……. Petitioner Versus AMITA KUMARI @ ARUITA KUMARI, wife of Sri Munna Chouhan, D/o Ramadhin Chouhan, R/o Daulatpur, Kumbhra, P.S. Ghoshwari, District Patna. …. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate ------- 2 28.04.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph no. 1 of the petition. Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that this civil revision is directed against the order dated 17.2.2010 passed in Title Suit (M) / M.T.A. No. 32 of 2007, whereby the order of closure of evidence led on behalf of the opposite party dated 8.2.2010 has been recalled and applicant was directed to cross-examine the opposite party, if the affidavit of her cross-examination in-chief is brought on record. It is fairly submitted on behalf of the 2 petitioner that order being of interlocutory in nature, also in view of the law laid down by this Court in Jagdish Pd. Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and anr., reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, 442 the civil revision may not be maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision to avail any other remedy which would be available to him under law. In above view of the matter, this civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)