1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1109/2007 (Dr. Kishor Kalidas Gajbhiye Versus Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli & another) Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.P. Palshikar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sheikh Majid, counsel for the R-2. CORAM :D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 19, 2007. Heard Mr. Palshikar, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sheikh Majid, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2. The counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner in the instant petition is that the petitioner has not been granted proper pay-scale of Rs.8000-275-13500 in view of the Government Resolution as well as other relevant factors. The counsel for the Zilla Parishad, Nagpur makes a categorical statement that the said pay- scale has been granted to the petitioner. 2 In that view of the matter, the cause of action in the instant writ petition does not survive. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE APTE