WP(C) 4620/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSITCE ASOK POTSANGBAM Heard Mr.M.U.Mondal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and M<r. G.Sor en, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondents. Let a notice issue calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a Rule should not be issued as prayed for and/or why such further or other order or orders should not be passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. The notice is made returnable within four weeks. As Mr.Soren, learned Govt. Advocate accepts notice on behalf of all the Respondents, no further notice is called for. Pursuant to the order dated 20.8.2010 passed by this Court, Mr. G.Soren, learned Govt. Advocate has placed a written instruction in the form of a letter dated 7.9.2010 wherein the claim for settlement of the land is not disputed by the Govt. In other words, the process for the settlement of land as proposed by the Sub Divisional Land Advisory Committee (SDLAC) in its meeting held on 9.3.20 10 could not be implemented as the encroachers occupying the land in question, h ad approached this Court in WP(C No. 4971/2009 resisting the eviction therefrom, which was disposed of by this Court on 21.11.2009 directing the Deputy Commiss ioner, Dhubri to consider and dispose of the application filed by the petitioner therein for allotment of land in accordance with the provisions of Assam Land a nd Revenue Regulation as well as the land policy of the Govt. of Assam. It was a lso further directed that, if necessary, the application of the petitioner there in shall be placed before Sub Divisional Land Advisory Committee (SDLAC). One of the encroachers, namely, Shri Jyotish Sarkar has also filed Title Suit Case No. 410/2004 in the Court of Munsiff No.2, Dhubri. The case of the petitioner on the basis of the recommendation of the SDLAC shall be finalized within a reasonable period of time once the pending Court cases are dispose of. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands dispo sed of.