HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 347 of 2009 (M/S) Jasvinder Singh Gil …. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …. Respondents Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 6th March, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. This is a classic case of a petition being frivolous. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that although he had been provided a gunner, the expenses for the same is not liable to be taken from the petitioner. In case, the petitioner wants a gunner, he must abide by the conditions imposed by the State authorities including the expenses which the State authorities require for providing such gunners. There is absolutely no anomaly in the order impugned. Writ petition is dismissed in limine being totally devoid of merit. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 6.3.2009 Avneet 2