IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 189 of 2010 Date of decision : 13.1.2010 Jagdish Chand ....Petitioner Versus Khem Chand ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. In the impugned order itself, the learned Trial Court noticed that the evidence of the plaintiff was being closed in view of the fact that no witness on behalf of the plaintiff was present on that date inspite of the fact that the plaintiff-petitioner had already availed of sufficient opportunities and he had not been able to produce any evidence inspite of the fact that 11.10.2009 was the last opportunity granted for the purpose aforementioned. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to challenge the factual inaccuracy of the observations made by the learned Trial Court that the petitioner had already availed of sufficient opportunities for adducing his evidence. He only raised a plea of compassion which is not entertainable in view of the fact that it was a case pertaining to the year 2006 and sufficient opportunities had already been afforded to the plaintiff- petitioner to adduce his evidence. The petition shall stand dismissed accordingly. January 13,2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE