RSA No. 383/2009 10.5.2010 Present: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal,Advocate for the appellants. Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate for the defendants. Shri Budhi Ram,Shri Roop Lal, Smt. Khalelo and Smt. Fullan Devi plaintiffs/respondents No. 1 to 4 filed a suit for declaration and consequential relief against the defendants being the appellants and respondents No. 5 to 20 herein. In terms of judgment and decree dated 15.3.2008, Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No.2,Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur dismissed the plaintiff’s civil suit No. 176/1 of 2005/1998 titled as Bhdhi Ram & Others Versus Shanker & Others. Plaintiffs assailed the same by filling Civil Appeal No. 24 of 2008 which stands allowed by the District Judge, Bilaspur, H.P. in terms of the judgement and decree dated 30.5.2009. Plaintiff’s suit was decreed, declaring them to be in possession of the suit land. The Court below, has considered the material in its entirety while arriving at its conclusion. Defendant’s application for amendment filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC stood dismissed. In the absence of any specific issue the Court below rightly held that the question of execution of the will in favour of the defendants did not arise for consideration before the Court. The will in favour of the plaintiffs (Ext. PW4/B) stands proved by Shri Garib Dass,(PW-5) as also PW-2 and PW-3. The Court below has considered the entire material placed on record by the parties. The evidence has also been correctly appreciated. There is no infirmity, irregularity or perversity in the impugned judgement. The parties have been litigating since 1998. They must put an end to their litigation. In view of the aforesaid observations I find no merit in the appeal. No question of law, much less substantial question of law, arise for consideration in the present appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 10th ,2010(R)