1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1105 OF 2002 The President, Vithal Rukhmai Shikshan Sanstha, Kilaj, Tq. Tuljapur, Dist. Osmanabad (Dhanraj s/o. Madhav Shinde, Age 37 yrs., Occu. Agri., R/o. Kilaj, Tq. Tuljapur, Dist. Osmanabad) and another ....Petitioners. Versus Niloba s/o. Dnyanoba Kale, Age 32 yrs., Occu. Service, R/o. Kilaj, Tq. Tuljapur, Dist. Osmanabad. ....Respondent. Shri. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioners. Shri. V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 28th June 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard Shri. Jadhavar, learned counsel for petitioners and Shri. Sakolkar, learned counsel for respondent. This matter was admitted on 3.9.2007 and an interim relief of stay to the impugned order passed by 2 the School Tribunal at Aurangabad was granted. By consent of the learned counsel the matter is heard finally. 2. The order dated 29th of August 2001 passed by the School Tribunal at Aurangabad is challenged in this writ petition. By the impugned order, the petitioners are punished to pay fine of Rs. 5000/- and they were directed to deposit the same on or before 13.9.2001. The punishment was imposed for disobedience of the interim order passed by the Tribunal for continuation of respondent in service. 3. The stand of the petitioner management before the Tribunal was that the services of the respondent were never terminated, on the contrary, the respondent was placed under suspension and the inquiry was pending against him. The main appeal was pending before the Tribunal. However, the learned counsels for the parties informed the subsequent events which had occurred pending the decision of the appeal. It is informed that the Management of the petitioner school has been transferred to some other society and the respondent No. 1 is continued in the services of the said school. The order impugned in the present petition was passed pending the decision of appeal No. 57/2000. 4. In view of the fact that the respondent No. 1 is continued in services of school, which is transferred to another management and the appeal has not been decided, the order impugned in the present petition 3 is quashed and set aside as there remains nothing to be adjudicated. The writ petition, therefore, stands disposed of. No order as to costs. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/wp105.02