IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 2ND ASWINA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 5709 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.256/07 OF ANCHAL POLICE STATION : PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: ---------------------------------------- SREEKUMAR P.V., AGED 28, S/O. BABURAJAN, THUZHATHALOL VEEDU,PANAYAMCHERRY, ANCHAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE(PUTHIYIDAM) RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT: ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA (SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANCHAL POLICE STATION), REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J. ---------------------- B.A.No.5709 of 2007 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of September 2007 O R D E R Second application for anticipatory bail. Earlier application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner/second accused was rejected by this court as per common order dated 24/8/2007 in B.A.Nos.5174 & 5357. 2. Once an application for anticipatory bail is dismissed by this court on merits and the petitioner wants this court to consider the application for anticipatory bail afresh, it is trite that the petitioner must show change in circumstance. Except elapse of time, no other change in circumstance is even urged. The learned counsel for the petitioner attempts to reiterate the contentions which were raised already in the earlier application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner cannot, expect this court to consider the prayer for anticipatory bail afresh, except on the ground of change in circumstances. No such change of circumstance is shown to exist. 2. This bail application is in these circumstances dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge B.A.No./07 2 B.A.No./07 3 R.BASANT, J. CRL.M.CNo. ORDER 21ST DAY OF MAY2007