IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 191 of 2009 Krishna Ram Arya …Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent no. 3. None for respondent no. 4. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would not press this petition, if the official respondents reconsider the claim of the petitioner and grant him a fresh posting. 2. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 states that respondent nos. 1 and 2 will reconsider the posting of the petitioner afresh, as has been sought by him. 3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Resultantly, the interim order passed by this Court shall stand automatically vacated. The respondents are directed to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for a fresh posting within one month from today. 4. The instant writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 26.3.2010 Rathour