o , fr 'a 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2324/2OLO RAVI DAYAL & ORS ""' Petitioner Through Mohd. Khursheed, Adv. ver"sus STATE & ORS ..... ResPondent Through Mr. Arvind Kr. GuPta, APP' Inspector Bani Singh, PS Lahori ' Gate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER % 22.O7.20L0 Respondent No.2, Ms. Manju Dayal is present in person. Let her statement be recorded on oath. I have heard the statement mad.e by Ms. Maju Dayal, respondent No.2. This is a case of matrimonial dispute and after mediation the .,, respondent No.2 and petitioner No.1 are living and residing together as .L husband and wife. Respondent No.2 and the petitioner No.1 state that they are living happily together for last more than six months. lt is pointed out that other cases have also been withdrawn. Keeping in view the facts of the present case, I feel that it is in the interest of justice and parties that FIR No.325/2005 under Sections Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 2-/ 498-A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, police station Lahori Gate and the proceedings emanating there from should be quashed. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 4" - tlL L- SANJIV KHANNA, J. JULY 22,aOLO NA2, 4 -{ J ,4.