1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2378 OF 2008 (Sanjay Santoshkumar Patni vs. Dy. Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2008. Heard Shri Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kothari, AGP for respondents No. 1 and 5 and Shri Ghare, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Respondent No.4 has pointed out that he has cleared all dues of Respondent No.3 – Bank and Respondent No. 3 – Bank has also issued a no due certificate in his favour. Respondent No.2 – Recovery Officer has also stated the same facts and he also mentions that the petitioner was communicated to collect back the amount deposited by him with the Bank. In these circumstances, it is apparent that in present writ petition, the arguments of Shri Sharma, learned counsel about the propriety or otherwise of alleged action of Respondent No.3 in cancelling the auction in his favour cannot be looked into. The challenge in present writ petition is 2 rendered infructuous for the present. However, liberty to the petitioner to challenge the actions of Bank in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. With this liberty, writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE *GS.