IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2410 of 2009 Between: K. Ravi, S/o. K. Ranganna, r/o. H.No. 2-268, Kummari Street, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 S.V. University, Rep by its Registrar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 Mother Teresa College of Education, Proddutur, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not issuing the marks memo of B.Ed. course to the petitioner herein, despite completing the said course successfully and in spite of submitting the representation dt. 23-1-2009 as illegal, arbitrary, and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to furnish petition the marks memo of B.Ed. Course to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VENKATESHWARLU JEEJULA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.KASAJAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following : Order: This writ petition is filed seeking the following substantial relief. “to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not issuing the marks memo of B.Ed. course to the petitioner herein, despite completing the said course successfully and in spite of submitting the representation dt. 23-1-2009 as illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to furnish the petitioner the marks memo of B.Ed. Course.” None appeared for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondent University submitted that after filing the writ petition, the petitioner has been issued with the marks memo and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned standing counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.24.2.2009 msv