THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.18329 of 1999 Dated: 08.02.2010 Between: K.V.Subramanyam and another. .. Petitioner. And The Government of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariate, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings in Memo No.2335/CE.II.1/96-9, dated 24.12.1998, on the file of the 1st respondent-Government of A.P., and quash the same as illegal and against the directions issued by the Government from time to time, and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners from the date of their appointment. It appears, the 3rd respondent-CSR Sarma College, by its order dated 29.08.1984, appointed the petitioners as part-time boys in its College, and they joined duty and continued as such. Thereafter, in pursuance of the proceedings dated 11.05.1994 issued by the 2nd respondent, the 3rd respondent submitted proposals dated 19.11.1994 to respondents 1 and 2, for regularization of services of the employees, including the services of the petitioners, working in its college, after getting the same approved by the Departmental Promotion Committee in its meeting held on the same day itself. The 1st respondent, after considering the case of the petitioners, through their memo dated 24.12.1998, rejected the same, on the ground that they have not completed the required period of ten years service as on 25.11.1993 to regularize their services, in terms of orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.112, Finance & Planning Department dated 23.07.1997 read with G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance & Planning Department, dated 22.04.1994. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. There is no necessity of going into all the details. It is suffice to notice that in catena of judgments, this Court held that, for reckoning 5 years of service as full time employee and 10 years of service as part-time employee, for the purpose of regularization of the services of the employees as per G.O.Ms.No.112 dated 23.07.1997 read with G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994, the date of consideration of their cases is to be taken into account, but not the date i.e., 25.11.1993 as mentioned in the impugned memo. Admittedly, in the case on hand, the petitioners were put in service for more than 14 years as on the date of consideration of their case on 24.12.1998. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the impugned memo is liable to be set aside and is, accordingly, set aside, and the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners afresh in the light of the above observations, and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 08.02.2010 Note: Issue CC in one week B/o v v