MCC No. 203 of 2008 in WPMS No. 324 of 2008 Mr. Parikshit Saini, the learned counsel for the review petitioner, seeks to withdraw the petition. The review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 02.06.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 324 of 2008 (M/S) Manoj Giri S/o Vijay Giri, R/o Village Haripur Kalan, Raiwala, District Dehradun. ……… Petitioner Versus 1. Family Judge, Family Court Haridwar, District Haridwar. 2. Sunita Giri W/o Manoj Giri, R/o 10 Nalpani Road, Dehradun. ………. Respondents Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Bist, Senior Counsel with Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I feel convinced that no case for interference of this Court is made out as far as the execution proceedings initiated by respondent No. 2 against the petitioner are concerned. 2. Apparently, respondent No. 2 initiated the execution proceedings arising out of a compromise executed between the parties on 12th November, 2003, which ultimately culminated into the passing of an order by the Trial Court on the same date. 3. The petitioner is at liberty to contest the execution proceedings on their merits and in accordance with law. 4. The petition is dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 28.02.2008 G