IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14886 of 2009 SUDAMA URAON son of Ram Hari Uraon, resident of village Mandha, Police Station Rohtas, District Rohtas… Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner : Mr. S.A. Hussain, Advocate, For the S t a t e : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 4 08.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under sections 147/148/149/452/449/302 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act and section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the fardbeyan was recorded on 05.12.2007, but it was sent to the court on 07.12.2007, and, thus, apparently there is delay of one day. It is further submitted that there is possibility of his name having been added in the first information report subsequently. It is stated in the first information report that 40-50 extremists had surrounded the house, however, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, though he was only named as leading the group of the extremists. It is further submitted that it has come during the course of investigation that one Mumtaz 2 Khan had enmity with the deceased and he was the person, who had organized the occurrence, however, he has been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13524 of 2009. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has not only been named in the first information report, but in the protest petition also, which had been brought on record of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13524 of 2009, the informant had named him alleging that he was the leader of the group of the extremists and after committing the crime he fled away with other accused persons. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail for the present. This application is dismissed at this stage. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)