IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2937 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.7.2010 Rajinder Singh .. Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. …. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the respondents. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(a) That respondents may very kindly be directed to quash the order dated 18.5.2010 Annexure P-5 and 20.5.2010 Annexure P-6. (b) That respondents may very kindly be directed to transfer the petitioner in his station of choice as per transfer policy.” 2. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Annexure P-2 and see whether 2 the petitioner can be accommodated as per Annexure P-2. Till such orders are passed, the interim order passed by this Court shall continue. Copy dasti. (Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 13, 2010 (Kuldip Singh), (GR/Veena) Judge. 3 petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer as per Prayer 1 . It is seen from the reply that the transfer was made on account of annexure P-1 complaint. According to the petitioner, there is no proper either for the complaint and the allegations are also vague disputed by . It is seen that no inquiry was conducted on the administrative side on the complaint, as to its authenticity or varsity. The education should have atleast verified asked to the varacity of the allegations. Petition is disposed of and it will be open to the Ist respondent to verify the allegations as raised annexure R-1 and there is no substance in the allegations, it will be open to the first respondent to pass appropriate orders till the exercise is undertaken as at the order passed by this court is continue. (Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 13, 2010 (Kuldip Singh), (GR/Veena) Judge. 4