IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 2nd Bail Application No. 110 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Smt. Sakiran .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of FIR No. 44/2010, U/s 304-B IPC, PS Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar. August 10, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mohd. Azim, Advocate for the applicant sand Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. First bail application of the applicant was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 4.6.2010. Hence, the second bail application has been moved on their behalf. Learned Counsel for the applicant argued that co- accused Smt. Noorjaha and Mohd. Asif have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 6.7.2010 and 4.8.2010 and the present accused appellant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Smt. Sakiran be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.8.2010 PRABODH