IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 7151 of 2006 Between: K.Satyanarayana Rao S/o.Rama Rao Bhagyanagar, Karimnagar District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent Engineer, Panchayat Raj circle Adilabad 2 The Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj Division Z.P.office compound, Adilabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the writ petitioner and contemplating to recover the seigniorage charges at the enhanced rates as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and discriminative and declare that the respondents have to deduct the seigniorage charges at the old rates as mentioned in the agreement dated 17.7.2004 in agreement No.28/SE/2004-05 in respect of the work construction of four(4) rural road woks in Adilabad District under PMGSY- Phase-III-APIIIA-0146 or in alternative direct the respondents to revise the estimates by providing reimbursement of the diﬀerences in seigniorage charges as per G.O.Ms.No.217dated 29.9.2004. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.H.SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:08.09.2008 kdl