SBCWP1648/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1648/2010 Suman Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 02.04.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Kailash Katara, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has illegally been removed from the post of Gram Rojgar Sahayak on allegation that he received illegal gratification for issuing job card. In fact, petitioner was not even authorized to issue job card and this allegation has falsely been made against him without any basis because job card is issued by Secretary of Gram Panchayat. Even though petitioner was removed from the office on 16.07.2009, but his salary for period from 01.01.2009 to 16.07.2009 has not been paid. Having regard to nature of allegation against petitioner and the enquiry which has been held by respondents, I do not deem it appropriate to interfere in the matter so far SBCWP1648/2010 // 2 // as discontinuation of petitioner from the post of Gram Rojgar Sahayak is concerned. However, grievance of petitioner for non-payment of salary/emoluments for period from 01.01.2009 to 16.07.2009 may be justified. In that respect, petitioner is required to make a representation to District Programme Coordinator/District Collector, Bharatpur, who shall, in turn, examine grievance of petitioner and if it is found that he has not been paid employments/salary for the said period, then the District Programme Coordinator/District Collector, Bharatpur shall ensure payment of salary to him. Representation shall be decided within a period of three months from the date it is made. Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//