IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WA.No. 1848 of 2011() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32020/2011 Dated 01/12/2011 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ THARIYAN,S/O.OUSEPH,3/661,VADASSERY HOUSE,ELINJIPRA DESOM,CHALAKUDY(VIA), THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENT(S): / RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, O/O THE R.T.O.IRINJALAKUDA, PIN-682503. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THRISSUR. MR.SEBASTIAN CHEMPAPILLY, SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ. .................................................................... W.A. No.1848 of 2011 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011. J U D G M E N T Ramachandran Nair, J. This Writ Appeal is filed against the interim order dated 01/12/2011 in the Writ Petition declining to stay collection of motor vehicle tax pending disposal of the Writ Petition. 2. The appellant, admittedly, is in possession of vehicle, which has Tamilnadu registration, though his case is that he started using the vehicle only after changing the registration in his name and after obtaining fitness certificate. Since the learned Single Judge has not considered the Writ Petition on merits and is still pending, we feel the appellant can raise all the contentions before the learned Single Judge. However, we do not think there is any scope for modification of the interim order issued by the learned Single Judge. Consequently, we dismiss the Writ Appeal. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jg