IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10510 of 2008 MADUSUDAN NATHANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 23.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Challenge is to the order of rejection of the petitioner under section 9 of the Public Demand Recovery Act by the certificate officer. The order impugned contained in annexure- 4 is dated 10.4.2008. Many a things have been stated in the writ application by learned counsel for the petitioner to shake off the liability of payment of road tax of the truck in question. The certificate officer after examining all the papers has come to a considered opinion that the documentation and evidence produced does not inspire confidence because the affidavit regarding sale of truck is fake. The reason given by the certificate officer under section 9 of the Act seems to be in order. No interference is required. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)