1 CAW 926 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 926 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3439 OF 2008 Nitin Kumar Hanumant Salunke and Ors. ….Applicant Vs. Mahalaxmi Nagri Seva Sanstha and Ors. ….Respondents ----- Mr.S.D. Thokade with Mr.Siddheshwar B. Kalel for Applicants None for the Respondents ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 20th April, 2011 P.C. 1. Mentioned not on Board 2. This is an application filed for modification of the order dated 25th February, 2011. 3. It is submitted that this Court had directed that a Returning Officer, preferably a person working in the Co-operative Department should be appointed and he should hold elections within a period of eight weeks. The writ petition was disposed of in the aforesaid terms. It is now submitted that the Returning Officer has not obtained the provisional as well as the voters list and, 2 CAW 926 of 2011 therefore a direction may be given to the Returning Officer to publish the provisional as well as final voters list and the order may be, accordingly, modified. 4. It is not possible to accept the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners. By the said order dated 25th February, 2011, after giving a direction to the Returning Officer to hold elections in accordance with law within eight weeks, the writ petition was disposed of. If the Petitioners have a grievance regarding the manner in which the elections are being conducted by the Returning Officer it would constitute a fresh cause of action and the said grievance cannot be redressed by seeking modification of the order passed by this Court dated 25th February, 2011. 5. Hence, it will not be possible to modify the said order. The Petitioners are always at liberty to challenge the decision taken by the Returning Officer in accordance with law. The application, therefore, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (V.M. KANADE J.)