IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2634 of 2010 1. MRS. UMA SINHA W/O MR. DHIRENDRA KUMAR R/O EAST INDIRA NAGAR, KANKARBAGH, PATNA-20 AND PERMANENT R/O VILL.- LODIPUR, P.O. & P.S.- NAGARNAUSA, DISTT.- NALANDA 2. SRI DHIRENDRA KUMAR S/O SRI TUNNA PRASAD R/O EAST INDIRA NAGAR, KANKARBAGH, PATNA-20 AND PERMANENT R/O VILL.- LODIPUR, P.O. & P.S.- NAGARNAUSA, DISTT.- NALANDA. --------------PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA 2. THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY NEW DELHI, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY 3. THE TELECOMMUNICATION REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY NEW DELHI 4. BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. 4TH FLOOR, UDAY BHAWAN, FRASER ROAD, PATNA-1, THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANAGER 5. THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PATNA THROUGH ITS C.E.O. 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATNA 7. SMT. KANAK KUMARI W/O SATYENDRA KUMAR R/O EAST INDIRA NAGAR, KANKARBAGH, PATNA-20.------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4 22-04-2010 We have heard Mr. R.K. Rajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nirmal Kumar, learned counsel for the State. In this Public Interest Litigation the basic grievance is for installation of the Telegraph Tower on the roof of residential house of respondent no.7. That 2 apart, it is put forth, similar circumstance do exist where there is violation of Telegraph Act and Rules. Regard being had to the lis in question, we are only inclined to direct, it is open to the petitioners to bring it to the notice of the competent authority under the Telegraph Act and Rules who shall deal with the matter in quite promptitude. If a representation is made with the requisite details to the competent authority, the same shall be dealt with by scribing cogent and germane reasons. If there is any other grievance with regard to installation of any machine on the Public Road, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the competent authority. With the aforesaid observation/direction the writ petition is disposed of. (Dipak Misra, C.J.) Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)