LPA No. 1663 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1663 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 01, 2011 Sulakhan Singh …Appellant Versus POLC, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-I, Chandigarh, Sector 18A, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Harchand Singh Batth, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, Acg. CJ. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against judgment dated 18.08.2010 dismissing the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner-appellant. The finding of the Labour Court as well as Learned Single Judge is that the appellant- workman has not produced any single document to show that he was appointed or engaged by the management-respondent. The appellant-workman did not adduce any evidence to prove his case. The documents marked as W-1 to W-173 did not have any value to prove the aforesaid fact and related to entries in the cash sales control register and preparation of sales supply vouchers. The concurrent findings recorded by the Labour Court as well as learned Single Judge do not warrant interference in this appeal. LPA No. 1663 of 2011 (O&M) -2- 2. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. 3. Keeping in view the dismissal of appeal on merit, we do not wish to pass any order on the application seeking condonation of delay in filing of the instant appeal. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE November 01, 2011 Atul