1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2684 OF 2009 (Hanuman s/o Narayan Phad and another vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.J.Salunke, Adv., for the applicants. Mr. S.P.Daund, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 14/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Salunke extensively. The accused/applicant Hanuman is a Forest Guard, allegedly on the verge of retirement while accused/applicant no.2 Anil is his son, who owns the tractor. 2. Both the applicants seek to enlarge them on bail in the event of their arrest in crime No. 60/2009, by exercise of powers under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. 2 3. At this stage of the matter, without adverting to the merits, I find that there is specific role attributed to both the applicants; Hanuman and his son Anil, however, presence of Anil could be stated to be by chance but the role of accused applicant Hanuman is specific, he has coordinated collection of the amounts of the labour without making remittance to the labour. The statement implicates accused/applicant Hanuman. Consequently, following order: ORDER a) The application moved by Hanuman Narayan Phad is rejected. b) The application of Anil s/o Hanuman Phad is allowed. In the event of his arrest in Crime No. 60/2009 registered with Police Station Kurunda, district Hingoli, the accused applicant Anil s/o Hanuman be released on furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.ten thousand). 3 c) The accused Anil shall attend concerned Police Station on every Sunday between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. till filing of the chargesheet. d) The accused/applicants will not coerce the labours who have recorded statement against the accused persons. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2684-09