IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 18963 of 2010 Date of decision: 16.12.2011 Anu Arora ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Ms Seema Arora, Advocate for Mr. C M Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anjum Ahmed, Addl. A G Haryana for the respondent State Mr. Kewal Krishan, Advocate for respondent No. 2 Mr. B S Mittal, Advocate for respondent No. 4 and 5 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be dismissed as the same has been rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 16.12.2011 mohan