1 ® /^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF .TUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILPASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 13-78 /2005 PETITIONER Ajay @ lfe]i! Banarsi age 34 years (Head constable no<19) S/o late Naindas Banarsi R/0 police chowki chlntalnar Post j'agarguda Tahsil: Konta Distt: Dantewada (C. G.) RESPONDENTS ^ fe^^ ..•<.A^"'.^'^A< VERSUS / 1) ....'•y'./'--"^' ^•:y:../-'". <<i"'>< 1^-< 2) 3) State of Chhattisgarh Through: - secretary Department of Home Affair Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) Dy. Inspector General of Police (Admin.) Police Head Quarter, Raipur (C.G. ) Superintendent of Police Distt : Dhamtari / 4) Superintendent of Police District Dantewada(C, G.) "~'-'l«c-^>^.. "^^- ^", r'sv^ ^^^^ v ^^ ^., 4N 1^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IjINDIA FOR ISSUEANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT (S) OR ORDER(S) OR ^ IDIRECTION (S) •^ \jTyq <-qrqic)<<, tPTTl<<i<i<o, Rrtwyx »-^.^P^o:..f^.MA^^ *11*101 ^TT^ 3TT^5Tq^P(^c|i^<£;) ^200 OT^$T<^T R^Jch cT2TT3TI^$TSF^N? ?^T^R ^ff^T 3TT^$T coitasel slt 13.06.2005 ShriY.C. Sharma, Shri. AkhU Agrawal, advance copy. Heard on adiaission, Learaed counsel for | petitioner earUer posted Dhamtari only on 22.5.200p order dated 02.8.2004 transferred frora Dhaxatari fh.e petitioner also subinifs| 02.8.2004, the petitioner impugned order has been c^i fhat fhe petitioner had P/2 on 9.8.2004 and repiJE Supenntendent of Pollce t4 same has not been decided ^ Learaed counsel for present, the petition inay b^ coinpetent authonty to petitioner wifhm the stipul^.1 order of the petitioner is origiaal place of posting or| other thaa Dantewada Distrfc hds stipiil^ited <pi<iFo<i1vi +ii^oT^'(^^9 ^Ri^i<< ^3rf^T3TT^5T for fhe petitioner. Paael Lawyer for fhe State on fhe petitioner subimts fhat the Daatewada was toraasferTed to and fhereafter, by fhie iaipugned (Annexure-P/1) he was again 1:0 Daatewada. Learaed counsel for tiiat io. pursuance of order dated already joiaed ia Daatewada aiid ^mpUed by him. He furtlier submits le^. a representation vide Annexure- 'sentation was duly forwarded by the concemed aufhority but the so far. fhe petitioner prays fliat for the disposed ofwifh a direction to fhe 4ecide the representation of fhe period, so that if the toransfer c^nceUed, he inay conie back to his he may be posted soinewhere else ct. SP/FS/2005-20,000 r.f ^wT^l^iio)^, tp-al<«<i<»,Rirtw^ ^,^^.y...ft.^...m.^^2oo 3TT^$T q^q? (ijc||i^<s|<g{) OT^^T^Tf^H^ cT2TT3Tl^^Tg?^t^ ^a^ cpi^fo<i1ri^i+tcl>Y^r(^L<S) <<^-$<<< ^3lf^T3II^$T This limited prayer i4ade by learaed counsel for fhe petitioner is not opposed by l^amed counsel for fhe State. The prayer is aUowed. Let a copy of said rcp|resentation dated 9.8.2004 along with. a copy of writ petiUon ^nd copy of fhis order be filed by fhe petitioner before the coxn^etent authority within a period of one monfh from today aad ip such representation is fUed, the conipetent authority, shatl reasoned order as early as plossible preferably within a period of two raonths from. the date ^f filing of representation. Wifh fhe aforesaid o finally disposed of Certified copy as per n^les, ^ C, SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^.ispose of the same by passmg bservations, fh.e petition staads Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge t^