^' COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT Maliant Ashish Das Guru, Shri Mahaat Ram Bali Das Shastri, Sarvarakar, Thakur Ram Chaxidra Swaiai Maadir, Jaitu Sao Math, Purani Basti, Raipur (C3iliattisgarh] Versus 2. TIie CoUector, District Raipur (ClAattisgarh) KegistraT, Tnists(CoUector), CIiliattisgarh PubUc Raipur Shri Mahendra Kuisiar S/o. Notktiown. •awal, Shri Vyas Narayan Not kno%7n Agrawal, S/o. o, 0 10. ShriJ.N.Thakur, S/o. Notknown Shri Ajay Tiwari, S/o. Notknown Shri Shiv Kiimar Agrawal S/o. Not knoyi'n Shri Ramesh Kuiaar Agrawal s/o. Notlaiown Shri Rain Bihan Agrawal, s/o. Not known Respondent No, 3 to 9 inenibers of the Panch CoEunittee, Of5ce of Jaltu Sao Mafh, Piiraiu. Basti, Raipur (CG'j Superintendent of Police, Raipur 11. StatiiMl House Officer, Pohce Station Puraai Basti Raipiu- (CG) T3 !: Hon3-jle Mr^_Satish_K. Agaihotri, J.i Shri S.S. Rajput, cc'iinsel for fhe petitioaer. Shri A.S.KachIiawana, Goveniment Advocate for the State .?— 'assed oa this Stb day of Decembei- 2007] 1. Leamed couiisel appeariiig for fhe petitioner submits fhat fhe petitioner does not want to contest flie petition on inerits at fhis stage. However, the petitioner be permitted to niake a representation to fhe GoUector. 2. Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Govemraent Advocate tbr fhe State/aufhorities has no objection if the representation is m.ade before the CoUector aiid the CoUector ia tum will decide the saine in accordaace v>dth law as expeditiously as possible on inerits alter aiTordiiig proper opportunity of hearuig to the petitioner. 3. With fhe above observation, fhis petition staiids disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sugim.a