1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.2105 of 2008 [N.K. Shukla & ors. Vs. State of Mah. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.V. Samarth, Adv., for the petitioners. Mr. A.D. Sonak, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7. ----- CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND A.H. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 18th October,2008. Heard. In view of the Affidavit-in-Reply filed by the respondent no.6, and more particularly para 5 thereof, even the second prayer for reimbursement does not survive, as it has been clearly stated in the affidavit that the amount recovered from the petitioners can be adjusted towards Non-agricultural Assessment for the next year. Hence the petition is disposed of as infructuous. Judge Judge 2 |Hedau|