IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38250 of 2010 RAVINDRA KUMAR @ RAVINDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 1.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the allegation, which appears against the petitioner and which has been noticed in the earlier rejection order dated 10.9.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34685 of 2008, the Court is not inclined to direct release of the petitioner. The learned trial judge has reported that in case of the prosecuting agency producing the witnesses, the trial could be concluded within six months in maximum or, may be, before that period. Let the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna and the Additional Superintendent of Police, Barh ( I am informed that A.S.P. is posted at Barh) be directed to direct the Officer Incharge of Barh Police Station to produce all the witnesses of Barh P.S. Case No. 276 of 2006 on a day to day basis before the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II, Barh in S.T. No. 264 of 2007 so that their depositions are recorded on a day to day basis and the learned trial judge is able in disposing of the case in time. Any lack on the part of the officers to implement the present order of this court shall be viewed with seriousness. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna and Additional Superintendent of 2 Police, Barh for information and compliance. Petition is dismissed with the above observation/direction. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)