Civil Revision No.3902 of 2010 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3902 of 2010 Date of decision: July 18, 2011. Dera Aasaan Jogian & Anr. ... Petitioner(s) v. Amarjit Sharma & Ors. ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): The petitioners had filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, relatives, attorneys, party men or any other person acting on their behalf not to interfere in their peaceful possession on the suit land, description of which was given in the head note of the plaint. The trial court declined to grant ad-interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC. Aggrieved against the same, petitioner- plaintiffs preferred an appeal (Annexure P-2). The Court of District Judge, Patiala had also dismissed the appeal. A Coordinate Bench of this Court, on June 30, 2010, had passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that after the death of Mahant Dina Nath, petitioner claims himself to be Mahant Civil Revision No.3902 of 2010 -: 2 :- being 'Chela' (spiritual son of Mahant Dina Nath), while defendant Parminder Nath is also claiming himself to be Mahant being 'Chela' of Mahant Dina Nath. He further states that in such a situation, right of succession is to be decided and property should be preserved and none should be allowed to create third party interest. Notice of motion for 3.8.2010. Parties are directed to maintain status quo pertaining to the nature and possession of the property in dispute and not to create third party interest till further orders.” Counsel for the parties are in agreement that in case suit is decided within a stipulated time frame, they will have no objection in case the interim order dated June 30, 2010 continues till the conclusion of the trial of the suit. In view of the broad consensus arrived at between the Counsel for the parties, the present revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the trial court shall decide the suit within two years from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Till then, interim order dated June 30, 2010 shall continue. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] July 18, 2011. Judge kadyan