IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 26410 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.M. ABOOBACKER HAJI S/O.A.V.MUHAMMED, ARAKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, EDASSERY P.O.,THALIKKULAM VILLAGE BY ADV. SRI.C.ANILKUMAR (KALLESSERIL) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STAE WAKF BOARD REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, VIP ROAD, KALOOR, COCHIN-682017 2. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE & ANTI- CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 3. A.A.MUHAMMED, ARAKKAVEETTIL, VICE PRESIDENT(NOW ACTING AS PRESIDENT) VADANAPPALLY, THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLYP.O.,680614 4. VADANAPPALY,THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE,VADANAPPALLYP.O.,680614 REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. ADV. SRI.A.A.ABUL HASSAN, SC, WAKF BOARD FOR R1 SRI.K.P.MAJEED FOR R3,4 SRI.K.SHAMEER MOHAMMED FOR R3,4 SR.GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.26410/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT REPORT DATE 28.2.2011 FILED BY MR.K.A.IBRAHIMKUTTY,AUDITOR BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTAITON DATED 13.8.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.8.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS ANNEXURE R1(A): TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT 15.10.11 OF THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 26410 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a member of the Vadanappally Thekke Jama-ath and a Convenor of the said Jama-ath and its properties. The grievance of the petitioner is regarding the delay on the part of the 1st respondent in initiating further action on Ext.P2 complaint made by the petitioner. 2. However, a statement has been filed by the learned standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent where it is stated that the 1st respondent had appointed an auditor to audit the accounts of the aforesaid Jama-ath and that on receipt of the audit report dated 28/2/11, Ext.R1(a) notice has been issued to the Jama-ath in question. It is also stated that, on receipt of the reply and after hearing the concerned parties, the Board will take further action in the matter. 3. From the above averments in the statement filed, it is obvious that the 1st respondent has already taken cognizance of the manner in which the affairs of the Jama-ath are being conducted. Now that Ext.R1(a) notice also has been issued, the WPC No.26410/11 :2 : only order that is required to be issued is that the 1st respondent should take a final decision on Ext.R1(a) and then take further action in the matter. This the 1st respondent shall do at any rate within 6 months of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp