1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.90 OF 2010 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1360 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2007 IN CASE NO.CC-IV/5 OF 2005 Shree Gopinath Krupa Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. ...Plaintiffs/ Disputants Vs. Smt. S.K. Sachdeva ...Defendant ----- Ms. Madhu Hiraskar i/b.Chitnis Vaithy and Co. for Plaintiffs/ Disputants ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs. Though several attempts have been made by the Plaintiffs to serve the Defendant, the Defendant could not be served and, therefore, they have pasted the copy of the Notice of Motion on the outer door of the flat where the Defendant was residing. The Plaintiffs have filed affidavit on service dated 8th February, 2010. None appears on 2 behalf of the Defendant, though she was served. 2. For the reason stated in the affidavit in support, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Place the Chamber Summons on board on 2nd March, 2010. (V.M. KANADE J.)