1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 1052 of 2007 STATE V/S SMT PREM LATA Mr. NM LODHA,AAG, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. JAGDISH VYAS for Mr. VD VYAS, for the respondent Date of Order : 11.1.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties, and perused the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge. It is informed by the parties that the reference application had been withdrawn by the private respondent in January, 1996. It is contended by the learned counsel for the private respondent that it was in view of the impugned order passed in July, 1995 that the reference was withdrawn. Be that as it may. The learned Single Judge had found that the award was already made assessing the compensation @ Rs. 7,000/- per Bigha. Then, thereafter it could not be downwardly amended apart from the fact that it has already been found that the reasons for reducing the award are baseless. All said and done by the impugned order 2 the award originally passed has been restored, and in our view, the award could not be reduced after having been made as it crystallizes the rights of the parties, and Land Acquisition Act does provide a mechanism for setting aside the award without following that which could not be unilaterally reduced, and if reduced, the writ petition has rightly be decided may be for different reasons but then we are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order in our appellate jurisdiction though for different reasons. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. ( MOHAMMAD RAFIQ ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/