THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM SECOND APPEAL No.1126 of 2011 JUDGMENT: This defendant’s second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 08-03-2011 of the learned Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam in A.S.No.215 of 2009 preferred against the judgment and decree dated 14-07-2009 in O.S.No.1676 of 2005, whereby, the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam allowed the suit and declared the liability of the appellant herein for the decretal amount with costs, of Rs.3,36,000/- with subsequent interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till decree and at 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization, on the principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. 2. The respondent filed the suit for realisation for the amount borrowed by the appellant-defendant herein under the suit pronote dated 22- 02-2003. The appellant admitted execution the blank promissory note but pleaded that he had handed over the same to the husband of the respondent and subsequently had discharged the suit promissory note and took return of the promissory note and also obtained letters from the husband of the respondent, wherein the husband of the respondent had acknowledged that he had received amounts under various cheques and no dues are payable from the appellant. According to the averments in the written statement, the husband of the respondent allegedly created a blank promissory note in the name of the respondent with the assistance of his henchmen. 3. The trial Court, after consideration of the evidence on record including the oral evidence of the plaintiff, the scribe and the attester of the suit pronote and considering other material on record, concluded that the plaintiff established execution of the suit pronote and borrowal of the amount and accordingly decreed the suit. 4. On independent and cogent analysis of the evidence on record, the appellate Court concurred with the said finding. 5. In the circumstances, no question of law let alone a substantial question of law arises for consideration in this second appeal. The Second Appeal is therefore dismissed at the stage of admission, after hearing the counsel for the appellant-defendant. No order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 18-10-2011 kvr