*1* wp.3212.11.940.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3212 OF 2011 Ramchandra Parvati Rangat. ..Petitioner -Versus- State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents .......... Mr.Rahul S. Kadam, for the Petitioner. Mr.Shriram S. Kulkarni, for the Respondent No.7. Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 29th June, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard both sides. There is no reason to interfere with the order of the Minister, Department of Revenue & Forest dated 20.01.2011 because that does not decide the issue of right, title and interest in the immovable property. The argument of the Petitioner is based on the apprehension that some revenue entries which have been made during the interregnum would influence the Trial Court while deciding the suit. The argument, so also, apprehension is not well founded. The Trial Court will adjudicate the issue of right, title and interest of the parties before it in the immovable property, on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence led before it. The Trial Court will not be influenced by such revenue entries as they do not confer any right, title and interest on the parties. In the light of this clarification, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)