IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 13077 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 4, 2011 Khurshid alias Masoom ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present : Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. **** Alok Singh, J (Oral) Present petition has been filed challenging the pre-condition that there should be one local surety to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Both the counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State have placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Moti Ram and others vs. State of M.P. reported in AIR 1978 S.C. (1594) and have stated that pre condition to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing local surety is unreasonable. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order impugned stands modified to the effect that let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh) Judge May 4, 2011 Anand