1 Cri.Appln.No.5058/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5058/2010 (Vashishta s/o Limbaji Borade Vs. The State of Maharashtra) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SB Rohile, Adv. for applicant; Mr.NB Patil, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 11 th January, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) The accused, in custody from 22.6.2010 for instrumental in homicidal death of his father, seeks release on bail. 3) The Counsel for the applicant/accused submits that the applicant could not be instrumental in eliminating his father, his father could have been done to death by other anti-social elements, as his father had clash with a Dhaba owner – Shivaji Chavan and, therefore, suspicion creeps in against others and could not be to the shoulder of the accused/applicant. 4) Having gone through the investigation papers, there is statement of Ghanshyam having seen the deceased running two days prior to the incident, informing 2 Cri.Appln.No.5058/2010 him that his sons and wife are after him to alienate the agricultural property and he feared death to his life. In the statement of one Jindas Chavan, Electrician, he stated that on the day of events, saw three persons, heard conversation about transfer of the property from the field of said deceased Limbaji. A boulder is recovered. The ghastly act, at this stage, points finger to the accused as person responsible to eliminate his father. No case to entertain bail application rejected. 5) The observations are prima facie in nature. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/