IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 211 of 2011 Decided on: 26.09.2011 Rishu Vats …Petitioner. Versus Rashmi Vats …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Ritta Goswami, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that in the main petition filed for divorce by mutual consent, arrangements have been made for visitation rights. 2. In view of this statement, the petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. (Deepak Gupta) Judge September 26, 2011 (rajni) 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?