m THE HIGH COURT OF cHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G.) w.P. No. £9 3’ /2005 PETITIONER . . RITESH KUMAR DUBEY, S/o Shri Deo Dutt Dubey, Aged about 21 years, R/ o. Village— Amora (Amanara), Block- Akaltara, Tehsil & District— Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary Panchayat 83 Rural Development Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rair. The Collector, Janjgir, C The Sub Divisional Officer, Janjgir, District— Janjgir— Champa (C.G.). Te Chie Executive Offlcer, Janpad Panchayat— Akalara, District— Jajgir—Champa (C.G.). District Educaon Officer, Janjgir, District— Janjgir—Chamapa (C.G.). Block Education Officer, Akaltara, District— Janjgir—Champa (C.G.). The Headmaster, Primary School— Amanara (Amora), District— Janjgir— Champa (C.G.). The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat— mora, Block- Akaltara, District— Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Uttara Kumar‘ Sahu S/o Laxmi Parasad. Residence of Village- Amora, Block— Akaltara, District- Janjgir—Champa (C.G.). District— Janjgir-hampa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The above named petitioner respectfully beg to submit as under: f’ pu h f n ti A / x XI-HC—78 .oéo.oo. [p N o m5 200 WW(W) WWW WWW WWW WW WW $aaf§qané¥r 14.,032905 Shri PK Patel; counéel Advocate for the State/respondents shri U.N.s. Dec, Gov; N0. 1 to 7 on advance copy. Heara. L The main contention o that teooondent No. 8 has ill Samw'da Shikslm Karmi, G 6min Fattcllay'at Atnota, Bl (CE). Leamod courtgel for th was firstlygppointetton the Sa oancellsd on a complaint mat submits that about the said mz WP. No. 3798/2004 which main grievance is that durii respondent No. 9 has been No.8 which is quite'unjustitie d. Learned counsel further su/bniitstlmt/ for the petitioner. fieamed counsel for the petitioner is egally appointed ‘respondent No, 9 as ‘ade—HI in primary school Amanara: )ck-Akaltara, District—Jam gir—Champa [e petitioner submits that the petitioner id post and his earlier appointment was 1e by respondent No. 9 itseif. He also ttei', he has tiled a Writ petition hearing is'pending before this Court. Now the 1g the pendeney of the said petition, appOinted by' the Sarpanchx’respondent 4‘ , XI-Hc—78 WWWW W P 0 695 2905' Wmooot§ooooo‘oooo§o0o g1 200 mm‘wiwr) ’ WWW? mmm mmakmmk WWW wg’ 9 amfawm a representation in this regard 1 as also been filed as rAnnexure-P/l. I havepenised the record ofihe case. The Writ petition of sue a dispute cannot be entextained by this Court particularly inthe circumstance when the petition in relation to cancellation of app intment of the petitioner is pending before this Couxt. Ifthe petitio, r succeeds in that petition, the result of same will be followed and if any appointment is made in between that period, that will automatioally‘ be subject to decision of the earlier petition. I am not inelined to entertain this petitionrat this stage. With the aforesaid obser Iations, the petition stands dismissed. .Sd/Z. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge