1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.804 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.1996 OF 2003 Rabo India Finance Pvt.Ltd. .. Plaintiff Versus Lanyards Foods Ltd. and Ors. through O.L. .. Defendants Mr.A.S.Doctor i/b. Junnarkar & Associates for plaintiff Ms.D.Sahi for O.L. M.S.Dehlvi i/b. Negandhi Shah and Hamayatullah for defendant Nos.8 and 9 Mr.A.P.Nair i/b. Khaitan and Jaykar for defendant No.7 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 6th October 2008 P.C. . Needless to state that for the respondent, Official Liquidator being substituted in place of defendant No.1 company or added as defendant in his capacity as Official Liquidator, there is no question of obtaining leave under 2 Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956. That apart, grant of relieef prayed in the chamber summons does not mean that this Court has in any way dispensed with the requirement of obtaining leave under section 446 of the Companies Act. 2. Perused the chamber summons and the affidavit in support so also the annexures. There is no reply filed. None of the statements therein are denied or controverted. In such circumstances, this chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be carried out within two weeks from today. Copy of the amended plaint be served within two weeks thereafter. Additional written statement, if any, to be filed within two weeks from the date of service of amended plaint. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)