HON’BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. YETHIRAJULU W.P.No.21943 of 1998 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking to declare the order of the first respondent, dated 29-07-1998 as bad, illegal, and void and to set aside the same. The petitioner is a Trust established to run the educational institutions. At the instance of the sixth respondent, an enquiry was conducted by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 87 of the Endowments Act (for short ‘the Act’) and passed orders holding that the petitioner trust is a charitable trust under the Endowments Act. The Deputy Commissioner forwarded the order to the second respondent for confirmation as required under the Act. The second respondent, instead of confirming the order, remanded the matter to the Deputy Commissioner for fresh disposal according to law by keeping in view of the observations made by him in the body of the order. Against the said order of the second respondent, a revision petition was filed by the sixth respondent before the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the Government, while requesting the Commissioner to send a detailed report along with the connected records, suspended the orders of the second respondent, dated 06-07-1998 until the further orders. Challenging the said memo of the Government, dated 29-07- 1998, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner contending that the sixth respondent ought to have preferred an Appeal under Section 88 of the Act to the District Judge, whereas he approached the Government and the Government has no power to pass the impugned order, therefore, he requested to set aside the same. The order, dated 29-07-1998 was passed by the Government of A.P. suspending the orders passed by the second respondent, dated 06-07-1998. But subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the Government of A.P. through the memo, dated 28-12-1998, passed the following order: “The orders issued in Government Memo No.54351/Endts.II(1)/98-1, dt.29.7.1998 are hereby withdrawn. The Commissioner of Endowments Department, is requested to take necessary action in the matter accordingly.” The Government, after receipt of the report from the second respondent, issued another memo, dated 28-12-1998 withdrawing the earlier memo. Therefore, no cause of action survives to consider the present writ petition on merits. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. __________________ Dr. G.YETHIRAJULU, J Date: -03-2008 YCR