' 18 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2288/2010 RUPENDER SINGH & ORS Through versus .... Petitioner Mr. Neeraj Bansal, Mr. S.K. Pandey and Mr. ManoL Advocates. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .... Respondent CORAM: Through Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP. ASI Kamlesh, PS Palam Village. Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. for the respondent No.2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER 30.08.2010 Respondent No.2, Ms. Sapna is present in person. Let her staLement ' be recorded on oath. I have heard the statement made by the respondent No.2. Matrimonial disputes had resulted in registration of FIR No.88/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, police station Palam Village against the petitio11ers. The parties have in the meanwhile settled their differences and have separated. Decree of divorce has been passed. The petitioners have paid Rs. 4 lacs to the respondent No.2 in terms of the settlement. Charge sheet has not been filed in the present case. I Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified No useful purpose will be served in continuing with the investigation ) in view of the settlement. Accordingly, the FIR No.88/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 Indian Penal Code, police station Palam Village and the proceedings emanating therefrom are set aside/quashed. Dasti. AUGUST 30, 2010 NA / ·l l L-. SANJIV KHANNA, J. I