^Gl IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(Q No. 72010 PETITIONER ,\1°^ Y^^^: . ^-.^^Y^-^ ^-V°'.^^'J^/3..'···:;"' .^':' <3\\-:i'" RESPONDENTS :'Q7nn"T,T*f^"^ ' Arjun Singh Thakur, Son ofAnand Ram Thakur, aged about 50 years, retired Assistant Teacher, R/o. Paneka,Near Basantpur, Rajnand- Gaon, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.), 2. Joint Director, Kosh Lekha Awam Pension, Shankarnagar, Raipur(C.G.), 3. - Lekhadhikari, Kosh, tekha Awam (Sji. Pension, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION U/A. 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF MANDAMUS, AGAINSTTHE RESPONDENTS 1 E8F—~ w !> l"<aES» HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1106 of2010 PETITIONER : ArjunSinghThakur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WR1TPETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri V.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for fte State/respondeiits. OKDER(ORAL) (Passed aa 07th day of Jmuary, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitioner submits that the case, j» being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to th& pension comnuttee. 2. This Court, inthe matter ofW.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to tlie order dated 19.06.2006 passed m W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Charidrakar Vs. State Govemment and others)asi& order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of' Chhattisgark & Others v. Baij'nath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This petition is accordingly disposed ofinthe same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days fromthe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthe petition from 1he petitioner and tfris order. Therea-fter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a lurtfaer period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportumty ofhearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and fhe officers concemed may file additional documents, ifnecessary. The entire exercise, including payment ofretiral dues, ifany, to the petitioner be eompleted within a period of four months from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy oflhe petition to the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. 'Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge