IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 6040 of 2006(R) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- P.V. RAMANARAYANAN, “CHIRAMADOM”, PAINGATTERY P.O. NALLUNNADU, MANANTHAVADY. BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.P.V.VARGHESE (KANJIRAMATTOM) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), WAYANAD, KALPETTA. 3. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THIRUNELLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KATTIKULAM P.O. WAYANAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDENT. 4. THE THIRUNELLY SERVICE CO-OPEATIVE BANK LTD., KATTIKULAM P.O. WAYANAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.S. MUHAMMED HASHIM. R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 6040/2006-R APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 16/05/2005. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12/08/2005 IN WP(C) NO. 21291/2005. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G.O.(RT)NO.13/2006/CO-OP. DATED 03/01/2006. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE LETTER NO.C.R.P./126/2006 DATED 27/01/2006. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 31/01/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R3(a): COPY OF THE DOMESTIC ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS HAVING 37 PAGES. EXT.R3(b): COPY OF THE WRITTEN EXPLANATION DATED 30/10/2001 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.R3(c): COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE DISCIPLINARY SUB COMMITTEE MEETING DATED 13/11/2001 AND 22/11/2001 HAVING 2 PAGES. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 6040 OF 2006 R ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th June, 2010. JUDGMENT The connected writ petition WP(C) No: 6072/2006 has already been disposed of recording the terms of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner therein who is the fourth respondent in this writ petition and the petitioner herein. In the light of the compromise, the petitioner has filed a statement praying that this writ petition may be closed and dismissed as settled. This writ petition is accordingly closed and dismissed as settled out of court. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj 2