1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Company Application (CAO) No.46 of 2011 In Company Application No.64 of 2005 In Company Petition No.3 of 2001 [M/s. Prudential Cement Ltd. (In Liqn.) v. B.H. Venkatrama Raju and others] Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri Anjan De, Advocate for Official Liquidator. Shri V.P. Marpakwar, Advocate for Respondent No.15. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 14 th January, 2011 This application is taken out by the Official Liquidator for issuance of bailable warrant against the accused Nos.6, 13 and 14. In para 3 of the application, it is stated that the in compliance with the order passed by this Court, summons were sent to these accused persons through the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and the same have been received back unserved stating that the accused are not available at the given addresses. Hence, the prayer is made for issuing bailable warrant to secure the presence of the accused Nos.6, 13 and 14. By an order dated 24-7-2009, by way of last opportunity, 2 the time of one week was granted to the applicant/Official Liquidator to take appropriate steps to delete the accused except the accused Nos.6, 14 and 15 from the cause title. In terms of this order, the name of the accused No.13 was required to be deleted. However, the steps have not been taken as yet. Shri De, the learned counsel for the applicant/Official Liquidator, submits that appropriate steps will be taken within a period of two weeks in respect of the accused No.13. In view of the fact that the summons sent to the accused Nos.6 and 14 have returned back as unserved on the ground that they are not available at the given addresses, issue bailable warrant to secure the presence of the accused Nos.6 and 14 in this Court on 25-2-2011 in the sum of Rs.5,000/-. The same be executed through the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. S.O. to 25-2-2011. Judge pdl