..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1174 OF 2003 Balu Pandharinath Takale. ..Appellant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the Respondent-State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 16th April, 2008. DATED : 16th April, 2008. DATED : 16th April, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2003 passed by the learned Special Judge under the MCOC Act, Pune in Special Case No.4 of 2002. By the said judgment and order, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 3(i)(ii) & 3(4) of Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years and pay fine of Rs.5,00,000/- in default R.I. for one year. The appellant has ..(2).. undergone the sentence of imprisonment as well as the in default sentence and he has been released from prison. 3. Mr.Warunjikar the learned Advocate for the appellant states that he has no instructions from the appellant to pursue the appeal. 4. In view of the above facts, this Appeal is disposed of as not pressed. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)