IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2010 / 10TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16446 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.ASHRAF, S/O. P.K.KUNJU PUTHAVELIL HOUSE, KOORKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.H.HAMZA ROWTHER SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, THRISSUR. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, THRISSUR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 16446 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 31st day of May, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext. P3 order by which the petitioner's application for mutation of his property has been rejected by the 1st respondent. Since the petitioner has got an effective alternate remedy by way of appeal as provided under the Transfer of Registry Rules, I am not inclined to exercise my discretionary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext. P3 in an appeal as provided under the Transfer of Registry Rules. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.