XI-HC—78 ^BTI^T ^iT fqii^ TT^T 'STT^T^RfN)' 3^5T -q|<410^, ^•(-l^^, fsf(?'>l-H^< ,^.p.Hb. i^;°&07- W^v\l sb^lcb ^ 200 3TT§[yr V^K ( 4<i(^<^) '^ffwnftn 3?n^i SB : HON^BLB SH DHIRBNDRA MI8HRA. J, CR. M. P.fcffO. 152 OF 2007 PETITIONERS Vs. RESPONDBNT The Kots coun^el 2S.T.2007 Shri Saatosh Soni, Shri G.K. Beriwal, Dy. A.| The petitioners by fhe Cr.P.C. have prayed for pendiag ia the Coxut of Judicijal Section 498 A read with Sectiota Dowry Prohibition Act. <=t)l<Llf<n<fl'rl <Hl^<vff ^fe^ Tf^TE^K ^3?RF[W^T 1. Dhajrmend Kumar Kaanauje, aged about 30 | ycars, Son of Late Ravichaadx^ Kanjaauje, Pawaa Niwas Juna BUaspur, Teh^il and District Bilaspur (C.G.) Dia^sh Kuniar Kaanaiue, Son of Rav^chaadra Kaiuiauje, caste Soni, aged abo^t d28 years, rcsident of Baniyapara, Jzin^ Bilaspur,, Ku, [Sunita, daughter of Late Ravichaadra KaEijaauje (Soni), aged about 29 years, resi^eut of Baaiyapara, Juna B!laspui\ 4. Smtl Shayama BaiKannauje, wife of Late Rav^chandra Kaanauje (Sord), ^ed 56 resident of Baaiyapara, Juna yeails, Bila^pur State of Chhattisgarh, through P.S. aJi Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) for the petitioners. r. for the State. ^astaiit petition under Section 482 of of Criminal Case No. 286/2006 Magistrate First Class, Korba under 34ofI.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of quas^uaent ^ ^- XI-HC—78 3:TT^T ^FT kv\\^ ^T^T -STT^T $b^lch ^ 3^cT ^|NI<7'><4, ^>TQ'y<l<S, (sf0W^< ^l^dl *^Jch •••—••—-—•——-—••— "^ 200 3TI^T XT5R? ( 4<^?l<s'<i^ ) ^iTW ^TT ^T^T Sobi The grounds urged by are fhat inarriage of the coinplamant Snit. Ashabai after mamage when she was| opined that she was canyiag husbaad and other faauly parental home and left her a false report agaiast the petitioners in the naaie of that froin a perusal of fhe cha| alleged harassinent was of action arose within the juns| In fhese circumstaaces, filed before fhe trial Court, hov| Annexure D-1. I have heard leanied the order of Annexure D-1 asl iiled along with the mstaat Froin perusal of fhe complamaat has made harassed her in fhe name ofl Washing Machiae ete. aad be^ Tata Suino jeep and left her considermg the aforesaid act attega1|ions <=bi<4f<n<fli 'W^ '^.f^^t' <p3i^i< '^'3?ftW3TT^T flie learaed counsel for the petitioners p^titioner No. 1 was solemnized with So|oi on 19-6-2002, however mimediately exanuiied by the Doctor, fhe Doctor >rcgnaacy. In fhese circumstaaces, fhe 24einbers took the coiaplamaat to her ;, Thereafter, fhe coiaplainaat lodged that she was harassed by the of dowiy. It is further contended Aajrge sheet, it would be evident that the at Biiaspur and no part ofcause juris|diction of Mahila PoUce Station, Korba. iinder Section 178 ofCr,P.C. was ^ever the same was rcjected by order of th^re peqtioners deifciaad ha|rg< perpetrated appUc^ition coitasel for the petitioners, I have perused also the F.I.R. and the charge sheet petltion. i<npugned order, it appears that fhe agaiast the petitioners that fhey demaad of Motorcycle, Hero Honda, |it her aad ultimately tbey took her ia a i^i her parental house, The trial Court |of ffae petitionei^ and considenng fhe 3^ST ^1-41^^, ^rn'H41(o, fsf<?l>t<-!^< C^fYl.P. Mo.i^-^/^oo^. Nl*<d( *l<|cb """"""•"""""""""""""""""•"""•"^ 200 3H^?T X?5T^ (^^<^) '^ ^tT^T^T R^Jcb 'TOT WCT '^W^ '^nwHf^T^n^T alsb par|sntal aUegations appearing in the ct|a held fhat fhe offence was form of leaviag her at her nanie of deniand of dowry. Sct petitioners ia fhis application evidence which can be raised and fhe saine canaot be adju^ 482 ofCr.P.C. Therc is no The petition beiag devoi4 aad it is disraissed at adndssiob Consequentiy, I.A. No, l, :t|arg€ groujad CM^f^i<iil '!TR^f 'S ftTst ipyi^K '^^tRFT3^?T ^arge sheet aad F.I.R., has prima facie coimnitted by fhe petitioners ia fhe place after harassing her ia fhe far as other defence agitated by fhe |is concemed, tih.e same are matter of t>y tfae petitioners at appropriate stage licated ia a proceediag under Section available for quashment of FJ,R, of substance is liable to be disnussed st^e. ^ 2007 also staiids dismissed, Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge GRPRJ — FS/246—2/2007 — 50,UOO. Ki