IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16145 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- UDAYAKUMAR.V., MAROTTIKKAL HOUSE, T.V.PURAM.P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST-686606. BY ADV. SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, KOTTAYAM-685007. SC SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHAN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16145 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER EXT.P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD EXT.P3- THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.4.11 EXT.P4- THE TRUE COPY OF THE THREATENING NOTICE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY GRAMA PANCHAYATH (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDG P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................... W.P.(C).16145/2011 ....................... Dated this the 16th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is before this Court by way of second round of litigation. 2. Petitioner started a chick breeding centre within the jurisdiction of the concerned Panchayat. When interception was made, he approached this Court by filing W.P.(C). 29879/2010 which culminated in Ext.P3 verdict. As per the said verdict, petitioner was relegated to approach the concerned authorities for getting necessary sanction giving appropriate direction to have it considered and finalized in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing. It is stated that the petitioner satisfied all the requirements by approaching the concerned authorities and has moved the respondent for considering and passing appropriate orders on Ext.P2 which however, is still to be acted upon and hence is under challenge. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent as well. W.P.(C).16145/11 2 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, there will be a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P2 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs