1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2048 OF 2010 Mr. Anil Waghu Khilare. ..Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. S.R.Patil for the Applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP. For the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 06/5/2010 PC : 1 This is an application for grant of bail. The applicant is shown as an accused in C.R.No. 562/2006 registered by Kothrud Police Station for the alleged offences under sections 302,307,143, 147,148,149,109, 120B of the IPC, Section 3(25) of the Arms Act and Section 3(1), 3(2) and 3(4) of the MCOC Act. Deceased is one Sandeep Mohol. It is the case of the prosecution that he has enmity with the accused No.1 Sachin Pote. The complaint is filed by eye witness and he states that when he was 2 travelling along with witness Ramesh Bhosale and the deceased Sandeep Mohol their car was way laid by persons who came on motor cycles. The glass of their car was broken and Sachin Pote fired shots on the deceased killing him . As far as present applicant is concerned, he is specifically named in the FIR as one of the person who came on the motor cycle. He is also named by second eye witness Ramesh Bhosale. Advocate appearing for the applicant states that he is entitled for bail on the ground of parity with accused Rahul Taru. In so far as Rahul Taru is concerned, he was not named in the FIR or by the other witnesses and he was not identified in the identification parade. He was also not identified by the constables who are eye witnesses and no role was attributed to him. In this view of the matter, there is no case of parity. Hence, application is rejected. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)