'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilic Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Appellant Plaintiff S.A.No.401of 2007 Nem Sai, aged about 56 yeare, S/o GangaRam Panika.R/o Sarbahara, Tahsil, Pendrar<»d, District Bilaspur (C.G.) versus 1. Mithai Lal, aged about 40 years, Kofurar, S/o Jagatsai Panika, R/o Teekarkala, Tahsii Psndra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. State of M.P. (Now C.G.), Through Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Present : Shri Gautam Khetrapal, counsel for the appellant. Resoondents ORALORDER (Passed on 06.08.2008) Heard on admission. 2. The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the dismissal of Civil Appeal No.35-A/2006 by the ^lditional District Judge, Pendra Road, District Bitaspur by Judgment and decree dated 28 June 2007 whereby the judgment and decree dated 11.5.20)0 passed in Civil Suit No. 87W1999 by the Civil Judge Class-2, Pendra Road whereby the suit was dismissed, was affirmed. 3. Paragraphs 14, 15 and 18 of the judgment of the iowerappellate Court are pemsed. The finding recorded by both the Courts below is based on proper appreciation of evidence, oral as well as documentary. Both the Courts below have held that the appellanVplaintiff. has. failed to establish that he is the sole owner of the suit property 3. In that view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises for determination of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeat is dismissed atthe stage of admission. 4. I.A.No.01 for grant of stay stands disposed of. Sd/- . ,.J DaipRaosahebDestaiukh^ Judge 19»"