BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10813 of 2011 1 PAULRAJ 2 SATHIYASEELAN 3 BALAJI 4 VANCHI KAPEEN VIKNESH ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 4 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.449/2011 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S. R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos A1 to A4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 363 and 506(i), IPC, in Crime No.449 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first petitioner is the first accused, the second petitioner is the father of the first petitioner, the third petitioner is the friend of the second petitioner and the fourth petitioner is the friend of the first petitioner and the false case has been registered against the petitioners. He further submits that the girl Gunavathi who is the second year B.E student and she is a major and eloped with the first petitioner and she got married and HCP filed by the father of the victim girl in that the girl was produced and she submitted that she had got married with the first petitioner herein who is the first accused in criminal case then only the HCP was closed. Today, the first petitioner and the victim girl Gunavathi has been present before this Court along with his husband and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the HCP has been disposed of that since the victim girl is a major and joined with her husband and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of the petition. 4.Considering the rival submissions, the alleged occurrence took place on 01.08.2011 and the complaint given by her father of the girl and the case has been registered under Sections 363 and 506(i) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ IPC. Today the victim girl was present along with her husband and produced her I.D. Card and she is also a major and she was admitted and express her willingness to go along with her husband, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkotai, Virudhunagar District and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 05.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 29/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate SR.No.29764 akm/05.09.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10813 of 2011 Date :29/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/