IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2273 of 2010 Date of Decision: 07.09.2010 Narinder Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Ranjit Kaur Kohli and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. J.S. Mehndiratta, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3 ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 21.11.2008 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri as well as order dated 24.11.2009 passed by District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri thereby dismissing the ad interim injunction application moved by the plaintiff-petitioner. Both the Courts below have observed that no injunction can be granted against the true owner. Plaintiff-petitioner is claiming himself to be in possession in property. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3 has fairly stated that suit for possession/eviction has already been filed by respondents No. 2 and 3 herein against the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondents further states that there is no question of forceful dispossession of the plaintiff-petitioner. In view of the filing of suit for possession/eviction, status of the plaintiff shall be decided in a suit filed by respondents No. 2 and 3 against the plaintiff for eviction/possession. C.R. No. 2273 of 2010 2 In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents that plaintiff shall not be dispossessed forcefully and shall be dispossessed in accordance with law and in view of the eviction suit, no further order is required to be passed. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) 07.09.2010 JUDGE reena