IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18463 of 2009 INDU KUMARI D/O SHEO JANAM PRASAD, R/O VILL-PIPRA, P.S-BARAULI, DISTT- GOPALGANJ. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, SARAN DIVISION, AT CHAPRA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GOPALGANJ 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, null GOPALGANJ 7. THE REGIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER-CUM-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRMME COORDINATOR, GOPALGANJ 8. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, BARAULI, GOPALGANJ 9. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFIER, BLOCK-BARAULI (GOPALGANJ) 10. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BARAULI, GOPALGANJ 11. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MAHAMADPUR, NILAMI, P.S- BARAULI, BLOCK-BARAULI, DISTT- GOPALGANJ 12. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PRANCHAYAT RAJ, MAHAMADPUR NILAMI, P.S- BARAULI, BLOCK- BARAULI, DISTT- GOPALGANJ ----------- 2/ 26.04.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. The pleadings in the writ application only disclose that petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra on 10.03.2003 and continued till 07.01.2004. There is nothing to show that that she was given extension on other two occasions, for the period of eleven months each. There is no merit in this application. This application is dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)