1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.566/2004. : : Tikam R. Tanwani Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. : : Date of Order 23.9.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Sajid Ali for Mr.Prahlad Singh for the petitioner. Mr.B.L.Awasthi, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the State. The petitioner, who was working as Librarian in P.G.College, has approached this Court with the prayer that the respondents be directed to give him benefit of revised upgraded scales of pay recommended by University Grants Commission in terms of memorandum dated 24.4.1993 and subsequent memos from the date of his initial appointment with arrears and all consequential benefits with interest. The petitioner has further prayed that respondents be directed to grant him senior and selection scales in terms of memorandums dated 5.8.1993 and 30.1.1995 as per the Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scales for Government College Teachers including Librarians and PTIs) Rules, 1999 and accordingly fixed his pay in UGC pay scales and senior 2 and selection pay scales from the dates the same became due to him. Shri Sajid Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court in Laxmi Narain Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : RLR 2002 (1) Pg.771. Learned counsel argued that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment but simply because the petitioner did not approach the Court, the respondents have refused him granting such benefits. Shri B.L.Awasthi, Additional Government Counsel though opposed the writ petition, but was not in a position to distinguish the case of the petitioner from that of those whose writ petitions were allowed by this Court in Laxmi Narain Sharma (supra). In view of the aforesaid decision, I am inclined to allow this writ petition in the same terms in which the writ petition filed by Laxmi Narain Sharma & Ors was allowed. The petitioner would be entitled to the same benefits as were granted by this Court to those petitioners by the aforesaid judgment. 3 Compliance of the judgment be made within three months from the date copy of the judgment is produced before the respondents. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/-