CE:%_ @. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) /, PETITIONER: Respondents / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. District Education Offlcer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. / r3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRIT PETITION (S) No. ZOO /2011. "x:, ‘ xi§i§§t§tar 9 Upendra Singh Kanwar, son of Mohit , Ram Kanwar, aged 49 years, working as Asst. Thacher, residence of Village 4 ’\ and Post Baisma, Police Station 09% \WT Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. w Ar versus HIGH COURT OF CHHATTfSGARH AT BELASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No‘ 800 of 2011 ’ WRW PETIT!0N UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Honbie Shri $atish K. Aqnihmri, J. P h Hish Kut Adocte fo te pter resent: Sri ar hiya. va r h eition. Shi A ir Pel Lawer or he Satespodt. r .V. Srdha, an y f t te/rnens Ped on 1‘“ dy Fy 01 1} (ass 0 a 0f ebruar, 2 s 1. > petitioner s nitia oin a stan eacer ixd pay . 3OO er pietion ratio ei‘ a grted reguiar ay scai. 2. Lne ue pparin te pitioner sums ta he ssue inv a s r h tio eiie ruie ,pa a a itia ntnt e mpition f proation perie. 3 The issue involve, rei a coer by 'e My Prs Sat dminisrative rinal, abaipu 0. Noe 275/8 Man a‘n 6 te V tai f P others, whrei it i a th smiii sitaed eachr r etie o guia pay ci e. date f inia poin. T atet akn t onbi o tii apntmet he mt was te up o H'e Suprme ur i piai e eiton iv . /. Th i t petition was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitied to reguiat pay scaie from date of initial appointment. , 4. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner also submits that this oourt, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others Vs. State of ORDER (ORAL) The wa iily appted s Assit Th on a fe of Rs I-. Aft cem of pobn prod he ws an p e . eard consi aeg for h et bit ht t i voied in ihe cse is ato whethe, te peiiner is ntld to egr y scle wet the dte of inl appoime er aftr coe o b d . d hen ws neideo ih adha adeh te At Tbu Jr in A 49 (dhukat Ydued 5 ohr§ s. Se o M. & ) en was hed tht e iary ut tes ae ntid t rer sae wf the e Cot n Sec Leav Pti (Cii) No 689293 e sad PETITIONER : Upendra Singh Kanwar VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others Chhatfisgarh & others [WE (S) No‘ 4725/2006} by order dated O1 09.2006, aNowed the petitioners to make a representation along with copy of the petition and annexures within a period of ten days, raising ali their grievances and in turn the ccncemed respondent was directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within a period of 38 days from the date of receipt of the representation. Accordingiy, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising aii his grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any. in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the h representation ln view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge