IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10224 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 28, 2011. Tejinder Pal Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of auction dated 4.3.1992 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Naib Tehsildar, Sales, Noormahal, District Jalandhar, which has been further upheld in appeals/revision by respondent Nos.3, 2 & 1, respectively, vide orders dated 12.2.2004, 16.10.2007 and 12.1.2010 (Annexures P-8, P-11 & P-14). The controversy pertains to limited auction of the land measuring 7 kanals 11 marlas held on 4.3.1992 for the persons of reserved category of Scheduled Castes. Respondent No.6 who admittedly belongs to the Scheduled Caste Category was the successful bidder. The petitioner claims to have filed objections against the above mentioned auction on the CWP No.10224 of 2011 [2] plea that he was in physical possession of the land in question. The objections were turned down and his plea that he was in physical possession of the land was also rejected by the Naib Tehsildar, Noor Mahal, vide order dated 11.9.1992 (Annexure P-7) and the said order was never impugned by the petitioner. The petitioner does not belong to the reserved category of Scheduled Caste and it is not his case that he was deprived of participation in the limited auction held on 4.3.1992. The Authorities below have concurrently found no illegality or irregularity in the auction held in favour of respondent No.6. That being the finding of fact, no interference by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction is called for. Dismissed. July 28, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE