1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.145 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.842 OF 1994 . Tardeo Properties Pvt.Ltd. : Plaintiffs. Versus Suvarna Amrut Co-op Housing Society Ltd. And others : Defendants. And Smt.Indira Kashiram Khamkar & ors. : Respondents. Mr.Avinash Joshi i/by Mulla and Mulla for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Sunita Komkar i/by Sameer Tendulkar for Respondent Nos.3(a) to 3(c) CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J DATED : NOVEMBER 14, 2008 P.C. 1. By the above Chamber Summons, the Applicants/Plaintiffs seek to bring the heirs of Defendant No.3 on record. The heirs of the Defendant No.3 are mentioned in the Schedule to the Chamber summons as Respondent Nos.3(a) to 3(c). 2 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.3 (a) to 3(c) has no objection to the Chamber Summons being allowed. 3. The Chamber Summons is, therefore, allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks from date and amended copy of the Plaint to be served on the concerned parties within four weeks thereafter. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]