1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.24 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1870 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7595 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: Smt. Nishita Mhatre, & Shri M. T. Joshi, JJ. Date : 1st August, 2011 Shri L.V. Sangeet Advocate, for the appellant. Shri G.J. Pahilwan, Advocate, holding for Shri N. K. Tingre, Advocate, for the Respondent. ------------- 1. The appeal is directed against the order passed on 17.12.2008 by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.7595 of 2006. The appellant takes exception to the directions issued by the learned Single Judge to complete the formalities as directed by the Grievance Committee with respect to the service book of the respondent-employee. 2 2. The main contention of the learned Advocate for the appellant is that since, according to the appellant, the respondent was compulsorily retired in the year 1996, when another Principal was in office, his service book cannot be completed by the present Principal. 3. The argument of the learned Advocate is required to be stated only to be rejected. If this contention of the learned Advocate were to be accepted, then in no case would the service book be completed, if the incumbent Principal retires. 4. Appeal dismissed. Civil Application also stands dismissed. (M.T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) pnd/lpa24.09