IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.11474-75-C of 2008 in RSA No.4372 of 2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.11.2008 Kamla Devi and others .... Appellants vs. Naresh Kumar and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajive Bhalla. Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the applicants-appellants. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the respondents. **** Rajive Bhalla, J, (Oral) CM No.11475-C of 2008 and RSA No.4372 of 2002 (O&M) Prayer in this application is to decide the appeal in terms of the written compromise duly signed and executed by the parties to the present appeal. Counsel for the parties state that they have no objection, if the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise deed (Annexure C-1) dated 22.11.2008. In view of the statements made by the counsel for the parties, the compromise (Annexure C-1) is taken on record. Challenge in this appeal is to judgments and decrees dated 23.12.1999 and 11.06.2002, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Jagadhri and by the Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri. The dispute in brief is that the respondents filed a suit claiming ownership on account of the appellants' failure to redeem a usufructuary mortgage. The learned trial court decreed the suit with respect to 1/5th share. In appeal, the first appellate court accepted the appeal and decreed the suit in its entirety. RSA No.4372 of 2002 (O&M) -2- During the pendency of the appeal, parties have resolved their differences and arrived at a compromise (Annexure C-1). In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the appeal is disposed of in terms thereof. The judgments and decrees passed by the courts below are modified accordingly. The compromise shall form part and parcel of the decree. Decree-sheet be drawn accordingly. 28.11.2008 (Rajive Bhalla) sk Judge