1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2008 Kalpanath Hiralal Giri. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents. Mr. R. V. Govilkar for the petitioner. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, APP for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 25TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: This petition has been filed by an Advocate of this Court seeking injunction of proceedings of contempt against respondents. We have gone thorough the petition. 2. The behaviour by respondent No.2 while acting as the Executive Magistrate may not be becoming of an officer if the allegations made against him by the petitioner are taken to be true. However, they are denied by the respondent. We have gone through the whole petition. The allegations are that the lawyer was not allowed to sit in the chair. Certain utterances were made that when their Officer appears before the Court 2 they are not offered a chair or cup of tea or water. Even if these allegations are taken to be true, we do not think they constitute the contempt of this court. 3. For these reasons, the contempt petition is dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. R. JOSHI, J.)