IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU_R_XC,.GJ. WRIT PETITION (C) N0; 6 / ° ^ OF20Q7. /~ o PETITIONERS : DEFENDANTN0.1TO 3 and 9 -/y/ -yx^"'./ j^w^' ^^<^" y^''^/ 1. Adltya Singh, aged 35 years Son of Shrl Balram Singh Rajput Kshatriya Resident of Tilakanagar, Bilaspur (C.G.). / 2. Vfjendra Singh, aged 35 years Son of Shri Vijaya Singh Thakur Rajput Kshatriya, Resident.of Beside the Saint Francis School Ameri Roacl Bilaspur (C.G.). >{-•" A1 r^ ..'*'., .A-3 ^~i:'' 3.' Daller, aged 56 years Son of l-ate Shri Gangapal Patel, Resident of ..^. Village Nirtu, Tahsil Takhatpur, n\ (^ / District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. Sanjay Shrivastava, Patwarl Circle No. 16, Takhatpur, District Bilapsur (C.G.). RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFF VERSUS J 1. Shri Kedarnath, aged 65 years Son of Late Shri Lakshmi Prasad, Resident of Takhatpur, presently residing at Gondapara, Bllaspur (C.G.). DEFENDANTN0.4 DEFENDANT N0.5 DEFENDANT N0.6 2. Rama Patel Son of Mangalu Ram Patel; 3. Ram Avtar @ Chini Patel Son of Mangalur Ram Patel; 4. Ramcharan Patel Son of Mangalu Ram Patel; s ' ^i .- s,*!e*'Saasaii -;.3iBSa»i^£fESi CS5?C'®n»»w"^—s ''3 / DEFENDANT N0.7 5. Batariya Bai widow of L.ate Mangalu Ram Patel; DEFENDANT N0. 8 6. ' Ram Krishana Patel Son of Mangalu Ram Patel; /' DEFENDANTN0.10 7. All the resident of Vlllage Takhatpur, Tahsil District Bllaspur (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Bilaspur (C.G,). W.RQ: PETITION UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONS3TI:U_TION_OF INDJA.1950, FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE_.NATtJR£_-Q-F CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, ETC. AND FOR OTJ±ER_APBR(1PEIAT1:; WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION_QF^ DIRECTIONS^ ^ ^- SD^I^iT K.'u* svi^f *^)^ flflcf iiu •h; y- 'S^I ^WW^, wAwie, hwwjf. ,^^^}...^-^ 'i^^r" ^ in*<ni g»>i[^> 200 an^rwiwgfta S.B. Hon'ble Shri Jiisttce fil.K. Adai'wal 18.03.2011 <»>H[(?i4i'Tln^^''^fs*<i1 <F>i<rii< ^sriigtisn^n Shri Preetam Tiwari, Advoca^e forthe petitioners. Shri Santosh Bharat, Advoca^e for respondent No. 1. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel ]La\vyer for the State. Leamed counsel appearing |br the petitioners submits that the matter has been compromiseq petition has become infhictuous. Accordingly, the petition is infhictuous. No order asto costs. bet^veen the parties and the dismissed as having become Sd/- N.K.Agarawal Judge f-qt^ ^fe-ir