IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20008 of 2009 SHIVJEE YADAV @ SHEOJEE YADAV son of late Ram Balak Yadav, resident of village Tartar (Jagir Tola), Police Station Ghoshwari, District Patna… …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…. … Opposite Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Premchand Yadav, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 3 06.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has been made accused in a case under sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The concerned mobile phone had been recovered from the possession of the daughter of one constable, namely, Arjun Prasad, who in his statement has stated that he had obtained this mobile from this petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner, though, had been aqrrested on 11.09.2008, he has not been put on test identification parade. Thus, the submission is that there is nothing to show the complicity of the petitioner in this case. Learned counsel for the State submitted that though it is correct that the concerned mobile had been 2 recovered from the possession of the daughter of the police constable, however, he has stated that he had obtained this mobile from the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner is accused in several criminal cases. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, Shivjee Yadav @ Sheojee Yadav, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each on the condition that one of the bailors must be close relative of the petitioner to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in G.R.P. Mokama P.S. Case No. 20 of 2007. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)