IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. 3370 of 2009 Date 3.7.2009 Hardeep Singh and another Petitioner vs Bant Kaur and others. Respondent Present Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. While allowing the amendment enabling the plaintiff- respondent No.1 to take the plea that the property in dispute is ancestral, the trial court vide order dated 18.5.2009 (P-5) has safe guarded the rights of the defendant-petitioners by simultaneously giving a direction that the plaintiff shall be given only three opportunities to complete the entire evidence as she has availed of six opportunities for leading the evidence. The amendment allowed seems to be necessary for the final determination of the nature of the property, which is claimed by the petitioners on the basis of a Will. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. July 3 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE