IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Application No. 1364 of 2010 In Special Appeal No. 19 of 2010 Geeta Chauhan, W/o Chatar Singh Chauhan, Village Pata P.O. Koti Colony, District Dehradun. … Appellant. Vs. 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Industry, Dehradun. 2. Director Geology and Mining Unit, Industrial Directorate, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. …Respondent. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State-respondents. Date March 12, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Special Appeal is directed against the Judgment and order dated 17.02.2010 of learned Single Judge passed in Writ Petition No.85 of 2010 (M/S), Geeta Chauhan Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another, on the ground that the petitioner has completed ten years of service from the date of his appointment in the year 1999 and a direction be given to decide representation of the petitioner for regularization of his service. We have perused the order dated 17.02.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge has categorically held that from a perusal of para 4 of the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner was working intermittently and there is no evidence to show before the Court to indicate that the petitioner has worked continuously from the date of his appointment in the year of 1999. 2 In view of the Apex Court judgment in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others Vs. UmaDevi (3) and others [(2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases 1] no direction can be given to the respondents to regularize the petitioner de hors the Rules. Consequently, we do not find any merit in this appeal, which is liable to be dismissed outright. The Special Appeal is accordingly dismissed. All pending applications stand disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia,J.) (B.S.Verma,J.) 12-03-2010 12-03-2010 RCP