: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2008 IN R.C.S. NO.135 OF 2002 Sudhakar B. Shetty ....Applicant V/s. Chief Officer, . Nallasopara Municipal Council ....Respondent Mr.S.A. Tawate for the Applicant. Mr.P.S. Dani for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. I am not inclined to grant an application under Section 24 for transfer of the case on the basis of the allegations made. 2. Apart from the bare words of the Applicant, there is nothing on record that substantiates the allegations regarding incorrect recording of evidence. If the evidence was incorrectly recorded presumably the parties would have filed a pursis in respect thereof. They did not do so. 3. I have no doubt that the learned Judge would : 2 : be capable of controlling the Court and the advocates. Indeed if there is any misbehaviour by the advocates, the learned Judge ought to and will no doubt take care of the same. 4. Further in respect of some of the contentions raised in the transfer application, it is always open to the Applicant to raise the same in appeal if the order is against the Applicant. I have no reason to believe that despite the alleged power being wielded by the parties and/or their associates in that area, the learned Judge would be uninfluenced by the same. 5. In the circumstances, the Misc. Civil Application is therefore dismissed.