IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11286 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. Narinder Kumar. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr.Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he had completed 10 years un-interrupted service and has completed more than 240 days, but his case for regularization has not been considered. Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-4 which shows that the petitioner has completed 155 days in 1993. However, thereafter the petitioner has completed more than 240 days in successive 10 years. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents-State to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization within a period of two months after production of certified copy of judgment, with all consequential benefits. (Rajiv Sharma) December 21, 2010. Judge (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No.