IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.6021 of 2010 and 4245 of 2011 CRP.No.6021 of 2010 BETWEEN Tuduri Shyam Sunder and two others. ... PETITIONERS AND Jhade Madhav and others. ...RESPONDENTS CRP.No.4245 of 2011 BETWEEN Tuduri Vital (died) per Lrs. ... PETITIONERS AND Jhade Madhav and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V.V. SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: MR. P. LAKSHMA REDDY GP FOR ARBITRATION The Court made the following: ORDER: The dispute between the landlords and the protected tenants with regard to two different survey numbers is the subject matter of these two revisions. 2. The parties have now reached settlement amicably whereby the landlords as well as the protected tenants have settled their mutual dispute by entering into a memorandum of compromise. For entering into an effective compromise, the petitioners in each case have sought impleadment of proposed respondents to these revision petitions. The said implead applications, being not opposed, were ordered today. Along with the implead applications, the petitioners have also filed memorandum of compromise separately in each of the revision petition together with applications to record the respective compromise vide CMP.Nos.7748 and 7749 of 2011 respectively in each of the revision petition. 3. All the parties in both the revision petitions together with their respective counsel are present in the Court and all the parties have identified themselves and confirmed the terms and conditions of the compromise and agreed to abide by the said compromise as a full and final settlement among all the parties. In view of the above, the applications, being CMP.Nos.7748 and 7749 of 2011 respectively for recording compromise filed under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in each of the revision petition, are ordered and each of the civil revision petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 9, 2011 DSK