IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-32556 of 2011 Date of Decision : 7th December, 2011 Jyoti .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shilesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel on instruction from ASI Gurmail Dass stated that pursuant to interim order of this Court, the petitioner has since joined investigation. It is contended by learned State counsel that the petitioner was named in the FIR as Anchal. However, it is also stated by State counsel that even according to prosecution version, the petitioner was not present in the hotel at the time of raid. In view of the aforesaid, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. Interim order dated 24.10.2011 is made absolute. 7th December, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) 'raj' JUDGE