1 Cr.Appln.1249.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1249 OF 2010 [Vishnukant Gangadhar Chandegave VERSUS Smt. Kantabai Gangadhar Chandegave] Mr. VIvek Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondent Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. It is the grievance of the applicant that by keeping him in dark, his Advocate has obtained his signature over the consent terms and accordingly in the Lok-Adalat, the proceeding was compromised. Under the circumstances, he wants that the order passed with consent in Criminal Application no. 188 of 2007, which was pending in the Court of J.M.F.C. Udgir be quashed. No other reasons are given. 3. In the Lok-Adalat, in presence of panchas and the Judge after recording the verification of the terms, the order is passed. There are no allegations 2 Cr.Appln.1249.2010 that any such procedure was not followed. Even the order passed in compromise in Lok-Adalat is not appellable. In the circumstances, the Criminal Application is dismissed. Sd/- DT. : 13.04.2011 [ M.T. JOSHI, J. ] arp