Bail Appln. No.2 of 2008 Case No ........................................ „ Order (s) with signature (s) PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. P. SUBBA, JUDGE The order dated 6th January, 2009 passed earlier shows this petition as disposed of. It, however, appears that the observation regarding disposal of the matt:er crept into the order through inadvertence. Accordingly, the part of the order which shows that this matter has been disposed is hereby recalled. Heard further arguments. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in the course of his further submission stated that the pet:itioner herein apprehends arrest in connection with the same FIR bearing No.RC-21/2008 of the Sikkim Vigilance Police as in Bail Appln. No.5 of 2009 - Kunwar Onkar Singh vs. State of Sikkim. It is stated that even though he is not named in the FIR, his father Kunwar Onkar Singh who is the former Managing Director of SDL has been named and his apprehension is based on the fact that he is an employee of the SDL presently working in t:he capacity of Executive Director. It is further submitt:ed by the learned senior counsel that vide order passed today in the above-mentioned Bail Application concerning the same FIR the petitioner Kunwar Onkar Singh has been granted anticipatory bail with certain conditions. Since the facts and law applicable in the present case are similar, the learried counsel prays that the petitioner herein may also be granted anticipatory bail wit:h similar conditions. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor raises no serious ob].ection to such prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Considered. Since facts in this case are identical and the law applicable to the case is same, I find substance in the Case No. „..E.?.i.I.A.P.P.I.P .... vy.9...?..9.f 2008 ia] No, Date. Order(s)withsignature(s) 1 2 3 submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner such, I am of the view that similar order is called for. Accordingly, this bail application is disposed of w following order:- (i) The pet:itioner shall be released on bail event of his arrest by the police/ar authority in connection with RC-21/2008 Sikkim Vigilance Police on his furnishing pe bond of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs with one reliable surety of I:he like amount satisfaction of the arresting authority. (ii) The petit:ioner shall not make any thr inducement to any person or persons acqu wit:h t:he facts of t:he case so as to dissuade from disclosing it either to the police or Court. He shall not maintain any contact w employees working in the SDL and intera them until t:he investigation is over. (iii) He shall make himself available to t:he I.0. Vigilance Police Station, Gangtok for interro as and when required by the I.0. (iv) He shall not leave the country witho previous permission of the Court unt investigation is completed. (v) This order shall remain operative for a pe one month from the date of this Order, meantime, the petitioner may approac competentcourtforregu|arba„,frv,se Judge 15-04-2009