IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 3975 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 25, 2010 Krishan Kumar …Petitioner Versus Roshan Lal and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for Jaskirat Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1,2 and 8. Mr. Rajan Bansal, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Mr. Binderjit Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Plaintiff-petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.04.2010 of the Appellate Court, whereby ad-interim C.R. No.3975 of 2010 injunction granted by the learned Trial Court, restraining the defendants not to alienate the suit property, was vacated. It is the settled principle of law that any alienation made during the pendency of the suit, shall be hit by the principle of lis pendens, irrespective of the fact that ad-interim injunction application is dismissed or allowed. In view of the above legal position, no further order is required to be passed. Petition is disposed of accordingly. November 25, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2