IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38474 of 2010 KUNDAN THAKUR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.38656 of 2010 1. PAPPU SAH 2. RAM UDAY THAKUR @ RAM UDAR THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 22.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Allegation is about kidnapping followed by rape and theft. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that Ajay Sah is mainly alleged for kidnapping, who married with the girl. Rape if committed by Ajay Sah and Shambhu Sah not by petitioners. Specifically it is said that when the kidnapped girl came in contact of her family member’s allegations have been levelled against these petitioners also being relation of Ajay Sah. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No.115/2009 corresponding to G.R. No.1895/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62