WP(C) 5844/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. The case of the petitioner for consideration of his case for appointment on comp assionate ground has been rejected by Annexure-’O’ letter dated 26.10.2009 on th e ground that the petitioner had submitted his application after two years of ex piry of his father and that there was no specific recommendation of the D.L.C. B ongaigaon. Mr. B. Ramchiary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, referring to the Annexure-’F’ communication dated 28.9.2005 made by the Superintendent of Taxes, Bongaigaon to the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Finance (Taxation) Department, forwarding therewith the application submitted by the pet itioner for appointment on compassionate ground, submits that on the face of it, the plea of the respondents that the petitioner had submitted his application a fter two years of expiry of his father, is not correct. He further submits that if there is no specific recommendation of the D.L.C., the S.L.C. ought to have c onsidered that aspect of the matter towards directing the D.L.C. to furnish nece ssary information. Ms A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department submits that if there was any irregularity in considering the case of the petitioner as per the stipul ated guidelines, the respondents are ready to do the needful in the matter afres h. In view of the above, the respondents are directed to re-consider the case of th e petitioner as per the yardsticks and parameters for appointment on compassiona te ground, as has been laid down in Achyut Ranjan Das v. State of Assam & Ors re ported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 and in Faziron Nessa v. State of Assam & Ors, reporte d in 2010 (4) GLT 340. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.