Court No. –1 Writ Petition No. 3160 (S/S) of 2001. Harish Chandra Paneru ……………………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others. …………………Respondents. -------------------------- Hon. P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in L.T. Grade and after one Year his appointment was cancelled and the services of the petitioner was terminated. The petitioner was again appointed after a day of his termination. Now the petitioner is working till date. The subsequent appointment of the petitioner itself indicate initial appointment of the petitioner was not illegal. Therefore, one day break shall be ignored for the purpose of seniority and other benefits in service. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (P.C. Verma, J.) R.P. Singh 15.6.2001