IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6858 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 26, 2010 Rajwant Kaur. …Petitioner Versus Brig. K.S. Randhawa (Retd.). … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that matter can be amicably settled through the intervention of the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Learned counsel further states that application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Trial Court on the ground that wife is a retired teacher and is getting pension of Rs.9500/- per month and she is also getting C.R. No.6858 of 2010 rent from the house constructed by her husband. It has been further observed by the learned Trial Court that husband is also retired Brigadier and is getting pension. I find no ground to interfere with the impugned order. Petition is dismissed. However, learned Trial Court is directed to refer the matter for amicable settlement before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. October 26, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2