CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10816 OF 2007 -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: February 15, 2008 Parties Name Smt. Santosh Kumari ..PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Navdeep Monga, Advocate, for Ms. Pooja Satija, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahavir Sindhu, D.A.G., Haryana, for the respondents- 1 to 5. JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral) Order. By filing this writ petition, petitioner claims that she be promoted to the post of Sanskrit Teacher from the date when her junior was promoted against the said post. When notice of motion was issued, following contention of counsel for the petitioner was noticed by this Court: “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been illegally over-looked in the matter of promotion to the post of Sanskrit Teacher despite her being fully eligible for the same as she had done B.A. with Sanskrit as an elective subject. Counsel for the petitioner has relied on Appendix B (Rule 7) of the Haryana State Education Schools Cadre (Group-c) Rules, 1998 in this regard. He has further submitted that the persons CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10816 OF 2007 -2 junior to him have been promoted as Sanskrit Teachers.” Shri Sindhu has placed on record copy of order dated February 8, 2008, which indicates that the petitioner, like her juniors, stood promoted against the post of Sanskrit Teacher in officiating capacity w.e.f. June 7, 2007. We make it clear that as the petitioner has not worked for the period in question, she be not paid any monetary benefit. Only deemed benefits of notional pay etc. be given to her as per law, as have been given to the respondents No. 6 to 10. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( Jaswant Singh) February 15, 2008. Judge DKC