AO No. 213 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent. Delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The court finds from the impugned order that a prima-facie case was made out by the plaintiff for grant of a temporary injunction. The trial court accordingly restrained the appellant from demolishing the shop on the land in question except in accordance with law. The Court below granted the injunction after prima-facie forming an opinion that the land did not belong to the Nagar Palika. The learned counsel contended that the ownership of the land was with the Nagar Palika upon which an unauthorized construction had been made. It is a matter of evidence which has to be considered by the court below. The appellant may file such evidence which will be considered by the court below. At the present moment, a prima- facie opinion was formed by the trial court, on the basis of which it came to the conclusion that the existing construction should not be demolished except in accordance with law. This court does not find any palpable error in the impugned order passed by the court below. The appeal is accordingly is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 20.07.2010 Shiv