IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15677 of 2011 Date of Decision : 07.09.2011 Krishan Kant ... Petitioner versus State of Haryana & another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Addl. AG, Haryana. Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M.Kumar, J. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the answer key has already been furnished to the petitioner and therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. The aforesaid fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. (M.M.Kumar) Judge September 07, 2011 (Gurdev Singh) sonia Judge