-i' C^r IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSlNO ^ &?.^ /2010 WRH PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETmONER RESPOMDENTS N>. ,<^y<w <^/-^rfc"' /A'- <t.•^•' Ravindra Kumar Tiwari,..agedabout 41 years, son of Shri S.P. Tiwari occupation - Lecturer, Presently working as Lecturer, Govt Girls Higher Secondary School - Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Educatioh, Dau Kalyan Singh ^hawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Distt. (CG) 3. ' Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & ^Pension), Bilaspur (CG) Principal, Govt Girls Higher Secondary School - Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 4. $ iiiwseeiesssisassia^Si^^ ^*'3^, fcl. ^ Xi-HC—78 '^SS •<ll<)l(y)q, ®Tliy'|<o,fqMI.My .M.B.<^J...Z'.6.^.s^ sn^r 'q^F (1pf3;^) SfS^I SBT R-fi<* WT 3?T^?T ^)*jiq» TODW^ftn 311^1 Tumane SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivbstava. J. 18-08-2010 ShriTarun Dansena, counsel forth^petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the| Statefrespondents on advance copy. l-1eard. Learned counsel appearing for the [tiet'tjoner submits ftatthe petitioner is enfitled to benefit of two advance incremetits on account of he having passed [ at his own cost It is submjtted ttiat no longerres integra and the same ^upreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., 200p (»9 WJft (SC) 59. It is further B. Ed. examination before his appointmenl the issue invoh/ed in the present petition i^ has been finally decided by the Hon'ble ^ submitted that this Court has also lakeri 06-07-2010 passed in W.P.(S)No.3250 of 2[)10. On the other hand, submissfon of Ijearned counsel for the respondents- State is that this petition has been fited withjsut making any approach to the State Government. He prays that ifthe petitioner 111«<[<'l<BltII^B ^ 'fel^t <fa|<^l< ^? StfilIT 3^51 a similar view in his order dated 'Moufd make representation, the same will be considered on ite own merits and in ^ccordance with taw. In this view ofthe matter, 1 am not jjiclined to entertain this petitjon atthis stage. It would be open for the petitioner t<> approach the State Govemment by making appropriate representation, claimirjg parity of treatment on the basis of ordere reisrred to above. In case such repr^sentation is made, respondents shall decide the same in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, th^ petition stands disposed of. Sd-1 Manindra Mohan Shrivastava •-~a^-,,-, Judge &\ i-.. !