84 CriminalRevision No162 of 2003OSMl 1 a In the HighCourt of Punjaband Haryanaat Chandigarh CriminalRevision No162 of 200308M1 Dateofdecision 29441010 Hans Raj etitioner t Versus fI 0 State of Punjab C0 e e C5 CORAM HONBLE MRS JUSTICE SABINA 1 S e1 0e Present Mr PTiwana Advocate c None for the 2 MrAmandeepSinghRai AAG Punjab 0 RR 1 0 4 C0 SABINA Je Petitionerwas convicted for an offence under Section 15 17 I of The IndiatlMedicai Council Act 1956 for short the Act1 vide dated 232003 passedby the Sub Divisional Judicial NabhaIide order of the even date the petitionerwas sentencedto undergorigorousimprisonment for a periodof one year 1 with a fine of Rsl 0001 Aggrievedby the same the petitioner preferred an appealand the same was dismissed Jide judgment dated16 102003 passedbythe AdditionalSessions JudgePatiala However sentence of the was reduced from one year rigorousimprisonment to SlX monthsrigorous Hence 8 Batra Amit Sh. Charanjit Batra 2012.10.11 13: 08 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 85 V No162 of 2003OSMl 2 the presentreviSIon petition Prosecution case as noticedby the AppellateCoun in para20f its is herein below h Il After of Ietter ExP7 bearingNo54 171 999 from Civil Surgeon Patiala by SSP he fotwardedthe same to SHO concerned to 1 the appellants and other quacks a registercase LetterE P7 was issued in pursuance of directions 0 0 High Court of Punjaband Haryanato issuedby Honble X C5 action againstthe quackswho are practicing in Pm X systemof medicines without any Z bySMO in that respectwas of List and name of appellantfiguresin that Iist at Sr the X No4 with ExPe7 After recordingendorsements c4j theabove receivedIetter FlR le copy of which is on Qo ExPm31was againstappellantand others 7 Z Appellantwas found dealing in systemof Clm theyear 1996 andafterwardsin the area of medicines tn Hira Nabha under name and styleof Janta Clinic without Iicence or permitof the P and that is whyFlR againsthis registered Il As per the case the petitionerwas found practicing Ill without a relevant Iicence Both the Courts 9 belowhave carefullygone the evidence available on record Batra Amit Sh. Charanjit Batra 2012.10.11 13: 08 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document wr 86 1 b 5 35 Revision No 2162 of 2003O8MI 3 52 Criminal 219 Oo andhave givena findingthat the petitioner was dealingin business 1 any Iicence The well reasoned 61 of saie of medicines of theCourts below call for no interference However keepingin view the fact that the is facingthe criminal 1999 it would be justand expedient to Since the year reducethe sentence qua of the petitioner to already Im r byhim 0 0 conviction of the petitionerunder Section 1 0 1531 of the Act is maintained However the sentence qua I C9 is reduced to alreadyundergoneby of the I him Fine hasalreadybeen depositedbythe petitioner Z The stands disposedof e 1 C6 ISABINAI C JUDGE April 9 2010 17 Z anita t 1m 1 4 e 1 Batra Amit Sh. Charanjit Batra 2012.10.11 13: 08 True Scannend Copy Of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document