^ ^l.l'09 o11 -ys? '^TPTR;R, ^tt1'y4i<o, f^ray ^RWW^Pff^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ~ 200 -W^T ^^^ (T(^r^r) STI^T^T ^Jch ^^T3T^T^?W '^H^R ^rf^ ^K^ W^Pft^ 'W?^ ^ fe^ <r?i^E< ilT^tRR^I^T PBTTTIONBR Kantiram aged Achholi, aboilt Veysus Nisliad Raj, Son of Late Jagaiinatli, 58 years^ R/o Durga Chaiira, VUlage Iprla, Dharsiva, Distt Raipur (CG) RESPONDEWTS 1. The Gfcneral 2. Ro^d The Ar^ Jail Food Direct^r, Laiie, P| The E4( BuildiF|g Bandi^ The throug|i aad 9^ Ciicusj W^lT EBTirIUU uNDER. 3. 4. b. »B:HON. 8KRS DHiRENDRAj The petitiouer while 1 Manager, F.C.l, Ring Road, Chour4ha, Telibaadha, Raipur (CG) :^a Maiiager, F,CJ, Madeena Building, [, Raipitr (CG) C|orporation of India, fhrough Managing Direct^ HQ New De.Uii, 16-20 Barakhamba ?ew Dellii tecutive Dtrector, F.CJ, Dhiraj Asma Buildir|g, Near An.on.t Kanekar PoHce Statioii, (East), Mumbai - 400 05 1 E4iployees Provident Fund Organization Commissioner, Regional Ofiicer -8th Floor, Mayur Bhawaji, Conuaught / New Delhi 226 OF THB CONSTITUTIOn AtTICLB iOF INDIA MISHRA. J S-1-2009 Shri Suresh Taiidan, A4vocate, for Uie petitioHer. Shri B,P. Gupta witli $hri Roshaa Dubey, Advocates, for the respondents / Food Corporati^n of India. ^orkuig as Diistiiig Operator, under respondents ni Mahasam.uu|i, has taken voluiitaiy retireiaent ui October, 2004, however his ^ension has not been fixed uor he has been paid tlie oUier retiral du^s eveii after 4 years of his retireBieut. ^^; '^.^w-78 ^ri^T^R^TW ^T^T ^T^F^RNT ^ -B^E? •^n^r^zr^ ^ti<)<ri<j^, f^^i^^< -_....^..£.L^...^.G;..2.1..Z?../^ '^mW^PTT^""""'""""" """"""""""""""""^200 ^TTT^^ ( ^lf^^) ^m^T ^rfN a^i ^± ^prf^pft^ 'qTR'^ff ^ ft^ llW^R ^-Stf^qf ^fT^T Coi^pors^ion Learaed couiisel for pressmg this petitiou at fhisj iile fresh representatiou for before the respondents No. 3j his representation aiid decid^ Shri B.P. Gupta, respondents/ Food petitioner files fresh represei^tation 4 monUis. in view ot me suDnus pailies, mis petitioii is rsiove a representation beforej grievaa.ee, mid the respondeht aad decide me sanie withinj receipt ot representation, ^he petitioner subinits that he is uot stage, however, he prays for liberty to (ixing of pension aad ofher retiral dues who m tmii, may be clirected to process fhe saBie wifhin a specified period, leained counsel appeaiing for Uie of India submits that ui case the L, the same shaU be decided wifhm disp^sed ision Biade by leanied counsel for the of wifh Ubeity to the petitioner to the respondent No. 3 for redressal ofhis No. 3 is further directed to consider a period of 4 montlis fi'om me date of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge