IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2009 / 19TH SRAVANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 598 of 2009(S) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: -------------- HARI.P.K, S/O. NARENDRAN.P.K, AGED 29 YEARS, SADANAM, MANHAPPATTA.P.O, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM - 676 123. BY MR.KALEESWARAM RAJ, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SREEKUMARAN.G, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SMT. KRISHNAMMA.B, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), THE KERALA STATE ELECTIRICITY BOARD, VAIDHUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY MR.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB FOR R1 & R2. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------- Contempt Case (C) No.598 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of August, 2009. J U D G M E N T Alleging disobeyance of the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-I judgment, the petitioner has filed this contempt case. The 1st respondent was directed by the judgment to consider Exhibit P11 and take appropriate action in accordance with law and give a due reply to the petitioners within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Annexure B1(a) is the reply thus furnished to the petitioners. The respondents have filed a counter affidavit also. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the averments in the counter affidavit cannot be supported in law and that a proper assessment has not been made so far which is evident from the counter affidavit itself. It is pointed out that the petitioner has already filed W.P.(C) No.22481/2009 challenging Annexure B1(a). C.C.(C) No.598/2009 2 Therefore, relevant issues could be considered in the said writ petition. The petitioner will be free to urge all the contentions raised herein in the said writ petition in support of his plea. Leaving the said remedy open, this contempt case is closed. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp