-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1129 OF 2006 Smt. Veena Motilal Kurnawal ...Petitioner Versus The Administrative Officer and ors. ...Respondents Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the petitioner. Mr. Nitin Jamdar for respondent No.2. Mr. R.D. Rane, Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: H.S. BEDI , C.J., & V.M. KANADE , J. DATE: OCTOBER 04, 2006. P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly given up the question of adjustment of surplus teachers raised by him in the writ petition. He has, however, urged that the respondent-department was bound to comply with the Government Resolution dated 30th January, 1996 and the letter dated 15th July, 2004 with regard to the ratio of students vis-a-vis teachers and also to the appointment of coordinators and Supervisors as per the requirements of the Department. We accordingly direct that Respondent No.1 shall look into this matter and if it is found that there is merit in the petitioner's stand on these two -2- issues, take such action as is deemed appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J.