Criminal Revision No.2380 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2380 of 2010(O&M) DATE OF DECISION: October 3, 2011 Amar Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Girotara, Asstt. AG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Sanjay Vashist, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 5. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The respondents were tried for offences under Sections 323/325/34 IPC. Three of the accused were summoned under Section 319 of Cr.P.C. though not challaned as accused. The Trial Court recorded order of conviction against all the respondents and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year coupled with fine of `1000/-each. The respondents filed an appeal against the same and appellate Court has maintained the conviction, but has granted the concession of probation to all the respondents-accused. The complainant, accordingly, has filed this petition to seek quashing of the order granting probation to the respondents. Consideration for release on probation is a statutorily Criminal Revision No.2380 (O&M) -2- recognized requirement and is to be legally considered by the Court having invoked that statutory jurisdiction. The Court, in my view, has rightly allowed the concession of probation to the respondents-accused. It not be a fit case where this Court should invoke its jurisdiction where powers have been exercised in accordance with law unless there is any unfair application or want of jurisdiction. Thus, the impugned order does not call for any interference. Dismissed. October 03, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE