t Sinflie8wch RESPONDENTS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. _^<6^T CONTEMPT PBTKNOW- N0. Vb^ OF2011 ^^ PETITIONER Shyamji Sahu S/o Late Jagatram, aged about 70 years, R/o Village salta, Post Sargaon, Via Bilha, District bilaspur C.G. VERSUS 1. Shri S.N. Panda , District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. Shri R. N. Pandey, Principal Higher Secondaiy School Pathariya, District Bilaspur C.G. COWTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ JVITH SECTION 14 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT The petitioner most respectfully submits as under:- J^ WA •^A iw^*...•:.1'^^;"., % *<.:/.I^ tl-HC-22 "k "-—^ y 't -. ^ .J ^^^/A^ ^^H'i.- ^n^T^f %^3Tli^T>' ^rRT^F^Tf^TT, ^L ^- '3^ ^|HH<11, ^Tl1^41^. fa^l^y StT^T T^ra? (Q HW^l ^Wch 3n^ ^l^ _....d^....£M^Q^Ji^ ^....__.....-....^_............^ ^^ T-?-^* l^fsr' .-^rO ^^fr^r^fi^'^i ....„..,.......——^-^^"-? <sM^fd<flT1 'HFI^ff ^ f^T2t iFt^K ^3^R3^?T nManindra Mohai^ Shrivastava..J. Shri Dashrath Prajapati, coun|sel forttie petitioner. Learned counsel for the petiti^ner submite ttiat vide opder datwi 7/5/C^ passed in W.P.(S) No.1021/09, the Court directed that the amount whi<d passed, the amount which was r< order of recovery was quashed and ttie h has been recovered shall be reftinded back to the petitioner witti simpte int^rest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after ttie order was /ered has been refunded. However, th@ amount of interest, till date, has hot been paid. In his submission, this amounts to willful disobedience ofth|e order passed by the Court. From memo dated 26/2/10 (^ sought necessary ailocation of funfs for payment of interest of Rs.3,894/- from the District Education Officer, Q that till date, the amount of interestl ordered for payment of simple inte| bound to make payment of interest^ limit is fixed, the amount of interesl nnexure C/2), it appears that the principal •ilaspur. It has been stated in the petition has not been paid. Once ttiis Court has •est, the res|X)ndtent authorities are duty to ttie petitjoner. Even though, no time is liable to be paid wtttiin a reasonable time. Considering that vide mern^) dated 26/2/2010, the Prindpal sought disbursement of fund from the Disl|-ict Education Ofncer, instead of issuing notice to respondent No.1 at thi^ stage, the petitioner may submit the representation to respondents 1 an<^ eariiest. In case, ie interest is no| two months from the date of receipl revive this petition. With the aforesaid observatiol 2 for reiease of amount of interest at toe t paid to the petitioner within a period of of copy of the order, the petitioner may is, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge