IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-5826 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 02, 2011 Dalip Singh and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate,for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Bhullar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent – State. Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate,for respondent No.2. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.194 dated July 15th, 2010 (Annexure P1) registered under Section 406, 420, 498A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') at Police Station Samrala, District Khanna, on the basis of compromise. By order dated February 24th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary, J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record the statements of the parties. In compliance with the same, Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samrala recorded the statements of the parties, whereby, they stated that they have compromised the matter. The compromise-deed (Annexure P3) has also been placed on record. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.194 dated July 15th, 2010 (Annexure P1) registered under Section 406, 420, 498A and 506 IPC at Police Station Samrala, District Khanna and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. August 02, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) gian JUDGE