^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Petitioners WntPetitipn (SLNo. 5Q37 of2PQ6 1. 2. Siat. Vijay Laxmi Bari, wife of Shri Kamta Prasad Bari, aged about 42 years, resident of Azad Ward No.13 Nawapara, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Snit. Gayatri Devi v.~ife of Sliri Devendi-a Prasad Gupte, aged about 33 yeara, resident of Gurughasidas Wari No.16, Kedarpiu', Ambikapur, District Surguja (C. G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Cbliattisgarh, tlirough fhe Secretar}', Departtuent of Wouien aiid Chiid Developnient, D.K.S. Bhavaa, Raipur (C.G.). The Conuiussioner, Woiaen aad Cluld Development, Raipur (C. G.) The CoUector, Ambikapiir, District Surguja (C.G.) The Project OfBcer, Women and Cbild Developiaent, Ainbikapur, Distdct Suiyija (C.G.) The District Pi-ogranuae Officer, Woiaen and Chfld Development Am.bikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) The Coniiaissioner, Municipal Coi'poration, Aiubikapiir, District Sui'guja (C. G.) Siat. Usha Devi wife of Rajkumar, resident of Nawapara, Am.bikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Sint. Uniula Das wife of Narayaa Das, resideat of Kedai'pur, Arubikapiu-, District Surguja (C.G.) 2. 4. o. b. /'. 8. (Writ Petition underAi-ticle 226/227 offbe Constitutiou oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms Sunita Jaiu, Paael Lawyer for fhe respondents No. 1 to 5. ( Passed on this 24T-h day ofJune, 2009 ) Heard. 1. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subniits ftiat fhe petitioner prays for withdrawal this petition wifh liberty to take recourse to the statutory appeUate foruiu, as provided under provisions oflaw. 2. 3. Tbatur Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State lias no objection. The writ petition is dismissed, as witfadrawn with the above- stated liberty. Interim order dated 14.9.2006 stands vacated. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge