IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9561 of 2010 1. SAHJANAND SINGH, S/O LATE RAMCHARITRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE BARKI KHARWAN (LALABHADSARA) P.S. DULHIN BAZAR, DISTRICT- PATNA CUM RETIRED S.I. B.M.P. -8 BEGUSARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE D.M., BEGUSARAI. 3. THE COMMANDANT B.M.P. -8 , BEGUSARAI. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BEGUSARAI. ----------- 3 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 1st of December 1999 from the post of Sub-Inspector of Police from the office of respondent no. 3, although the petitioner has been paid a sum of Rs.1,55,531, however, the petitioner is still entitled to more amount which would be apparent on perusal of the deduction chart annexed with the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for example on perusal of the deduction chart annexed with the counter affidavit it would appear that deductions have not been properly accounted for with the result the calculation of the GPF is not correct whereas the petitioner is in a position to demonstrate before the authority with the help of the deduction chart prepared by the department itself that he is entitled to more GPF amount. It is submitted that the persons who were on the post of the Constables, they have been paid more than the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that, in case petitioner points out any discrepancy in the deduction chart with regard to the GPF, the same would be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his grievances with regard to the payment of the GPF, petitioner proposes to place his claims before the respondent no. 4 by way of representation stating details of his grievances as also copy of relevant document in support of his claims along with certified copy of the present order with a copy to respondent no. 3. In case such representation is filed within a period of four weeks the grievances be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation upon consideration and verification of the GPF account, if any amount is found payable the same may also be paid with interest permissible under the rule. However, if the claim of the petitioner is not found admissible the same may be informed to the petitioner with reasons assigned thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)