IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10940 of 2008 1. MAHESH LAL RAM @ MAHESH MOCHI SON OF LATE MISARI RAM. 2. SADANAND RAM SON OF LATE BHUMI RAM. 3. MD. SULTAN ALI SON OF LATE HAIDAR ALI. 4. NAZIYA KHATOON DAUGHTER OF LATE HAIDAR ALI, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHANIYA BAZAR, POLICE STATION BANMANKHI, DISTRICT PURNIA----PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, PURNIA. 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BANMANKHI, DISTRICT PURNIA. 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, BANMANKHI, PURNIA. 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BANMANKHI, DISTRICT PURNIA. 6. MD. ABUL HASSAN 7. MD. SIDHIK, BOTH ARE SONS OF MD. HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MOHANIYA BAZAR, POLICE STATION, BANMANKHI, DISTRICT PURNIA---RESPONDENTS. ---------- 03. 04.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State as also counsel for the private respondents. 2. Perused the impugned order dated 19.12.2006 passed by the Collector, Purnia in Revisiona Case No.45 of 1998, Annexure-1 and considered the submission of the counsel for the petitioners as also the private respondents. It appears the Collector, Purnia has passed order impugned on the basis of the report of the sub-ordinate revenue authorities, who reported that Purcha was issued in favour of private respondents without any inquiry as to whether private respondents were landless and entitled for grant of Purcha. It is evident from the order that private respondents had their own land and house and were not entitled for grant of Purcha. The Collector having heard the parties recorded such finding recalling the Purcha issued earlier. 3. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 19.12.2006, Annexure-1 and the writ application is dismissed. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.) 2