IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.2384 -M of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 11, 2011 ARUN KHURMI ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. JS Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. SC Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondents 4 to 6. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner, as he apprehends danger from respondents No.4 to 6. 2 Reply on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has been filed. 3 As per preliminary submissions, FIR No.3 dated 8.1.2011 under Sections 323 and 336, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Division No.4, Ludhiana, was lodged on the basis of statement of the petitioner. 4 Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Baljit Singh, has also apprised the court that Criminal Misc. No.2384 -M of 2011 2 no incriminating material has been found in the aforesaid FIR and, therefore, a cancellation report would be filed within four weeks from today. 5 It has been said in the reply that the police has not been able to trace any perception of threat to the petitioner and, therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner is without any foundation. 6 In view of the stand of the respondent-State, no further directions need be passed. 7 The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. August 11, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?