IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2010 / 10TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 290 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.25614/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- INDIAN NATIONAL ANGANWADI EMPLOYEES FEDERATION (REG.NO.05/18/89 AFFI.NO.11946) STATE COMMITTEE, MARINE BUILDING, CHANGANASSERY, REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, MATHEW KULANGARA, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.JACOB, RESIDING AT THURUTHY P.O. CHANGANASSERY-686 535. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.GOVINDA SWAMY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SMT.USHA TITUS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHRI.P.P.GOPI (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE, DIRECTORATE OF SOCIAL WELFARE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- COC.NO.290 OF 2010 (S) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Violation of Annexure-1 order passed in WP(c).No.290/2010 is alleged in this writ petition. By that order this court directed that Anganwadi Workers/Helpers in the different Anganwadi Centres in the State shall not be selected by a committee which is constituted in terms of para 7 of Ext.P1 Government Order in the writ petition. Petitioner submits that by approving Annexures- 6 and 7 ranked lists as per Annexure A5 order, the interim order passed by this court has been violated. 2. However from Annexure R2(b) order it is seen that realizing the mistake the respondents themselves have recalled the approval to the sanctioned lists and directed that no appointments shall be made and appointments, if any made, shall be recalled. 3. From the above, it is evident that the respondents themselves have realised the mistake and rectified the same. Therefore there is nothing warranting initiation of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. Contempt petition is closed. vi (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE WPC.No. /09 :2 :