IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.957 of 2008 MANJU @MANJOO JHA Versus BISHNUKANT @ VISHNUKANT MISHRA ----------- 2 8.7.2008 Heard counsel for the judgment debtor- petitioner. The petitioner assails the impugned order dated 24.4.2008 whereby and whereunder an application filed by the decree holder-opposite party to the effect that the report of the Pleader Commissioner submitted during the course of trial should be taken into consideration by the new Pleader Commissioner appointed by the Executing Court for locating the land in question under the decree has been allowed. In the opinion of this Court the objection of the petitioner to the aforementioned order does not have any basis specially when the lower appellate Court had clearly recorded a finding as with regard to the earlier report of the Pleader Commissioner who had submitted such a report during the continuance of the suit. The lower appellate Court in fact had also upheld the report of the Pleader Commissioner while approving the finding of the trial court on the ground that his such report had remained undisputed inasmuch as even after filing of objection by the parties against such report the same was approved and accepted. In fact, in view of the matter if the Court below being the executing court has come to a finding that the earlier report of the Pleader Commissioner, would be helpful for locating the suit property and has directed the new Pleader Commissioner to look into that report for his assistance in locating the property, such order cannot be faulted either on the ground of material irregularity or jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being devoid of any merit must be and is hereby dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)