CRM No. M-26569 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-26569 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 5.5.2009 Raj Brinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. H.S. Bath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Mr. PS Goraya, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that son of the petitioner and the complainant (respondent No.2) have arrived at a compromise. The matrimonial dispute has been settled and Raj Brinder Singh son of the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 both are living together at the moment. Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from Head Constable Surenderpal Singh, who is present in Court) affirms this fact. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated October 20, 2008 is hereby made absolute subject to conditions envisaged by Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE May 05, 2009 'rajpal'