ssp 1 WP 1449 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1449 OF 2010 Saifuddin Dawoodbhai Lakdawala and Ors. .....Petitioners versus Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.A.V.Anturkar i/by Ms.A.R.Awasthi, for the petitioners. Ms.Kiran Bagalia, for respondent No.1. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Govt. Pleader, for the respondent No.2. Ms.V.S.Gharpure, for respondent No.3. Mr.B.A.Phadnis i/by M/s.Utangale and Co., for the respondent No.4. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 25 th NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. During the course of hearing, it is pointed out by the learned Govt. Pleader that he has received instructions from Mr.Kakani, Deputy Secretary, Urban Development Department, that before issuing final Notification under Section 32 of the M.M.R.D.A.Act, the objections of the petitioners were not taken into consideration and the petitioners were not heard. 2. In view of the same, it is pointed out that the objections of the petitioners will be taken into account and on that basis, final Notification under Section 32 of the Act, if required, will be issued. ssp 2 WP 1449 of 2010 Considering the said aspect, the petitioners are now directed to lodge additional objections within a period of two weeks from today and after considering the objections of the petitioners, if any, appropriate final decision may be taken in connection with the issuance of the Notification under Section 32 of the Act. 3. In view of the above, nothing further survives in the above petition, which is accordingly disposed of. It is clarified that the contentions of both the sides are explicitly kept open and we have not examined the issue on merits. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)