: 1 : caw.3268.2005 vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3268 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2914 OF 1994 Babhurao Shankar Gavale .. Applicant V/s. The President Bahiramdeo Education Society & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Anilkumar Patil for the Applicant Mr.J.D. Khairnar for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3 Mr.Amit Ghorte for Resp. No.2 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. (IN CHAMBER) DATED: NOVEMBER 14, 2011 P.C.: 1. The Application has been filed for reviewing the order passed by me on 7.7.2005. This order was passed in the absence of the respondent. According to the respondent, the name of his advocate was not shown on the Board and, therefore, his advocate was unable to remain present in Court on that date. 2. No material has been shown to me to indicate that the appearance of the respondent’s advocate was not shown on the Board : 2 : caw.3268.2005 on 7.7.2005 when the order was passed. Assuming a caveat has been lodged as stated by the review petitioner, it would not necessarily mean that the order has been passed in his absence because the name of his advocate was not shown on the Board. 3. Mr.Patil, learned advocate for the petitioner, sought to argue several other points in order to indicate that the observations made by me are contrary to the observations of the School Tribunal. In my opinion, this is not a ground for review. 4. Civil application is therefore dismissed. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)