IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 31015 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BHADRAKUMAR, PARAMKIMAMVILA VEEDU, EZHUKONE.P.O, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 31015 OF 2008 P ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P1. By Ext.P1, property of the petitioner is put up for sale. The case of the petitioner is that he is an abkari contractor and is aggrieved by Ext.P1. Ext.P1 is a notice issued under section 49 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act intimating the sale for realising a total sum of Rs.16,60,710/-. According to the petitioner, he has filed a representation before the Tahsildar seeking details of the demands except the demand D2 1648/99. It is also stated that a vast extent of property, 37.75 ares, is sought to be sold and the property is very valuable. The sale is posted on 23.10.2008. I do not think this is a fit case where I hold up the sale. Subject to the right of the petitioner to seek such remedies as are available, if he is so advised, against the sale of the property, writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 and give the details as sought for in Ext.P2 within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE