IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13982 of 2011 Anil Paswan, S/O Sri Chalitra Paswan, R/O Vill. More, P.S. Mokama, Distt. Patna. . . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna 3. The Block Development Officer, Mokama. . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 30.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Mokama Block in the district of Patna, prays for quashing the Memo dated 07.12.2010 as well as 29.07.2011, whereby he has been directed to refund the value of 251. 93 quintals of undistributed rice at APL rate. The petitioner submits that in notice dated 29.07.2011 the aforesaid quantity of undistributed rice has been shown as 285.27 quintals. The petitioner submits that he has already deposited a sum of Rs.1,57,500/- with the respondents vide Annexure-2). Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order 2 dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 20% of the value of 100 quintals of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks. The representation of the petitioner would be disposed of within 10 weeks thereafter. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)