IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 1003 of 2011-B. Decided on: 02.12.2011. ___________________________________________ Bal Krishan and Others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in a case on the similar facts, one Shri Mast Ram son of Smt. Jhusi Devi, village Thanaga, P.O. Devna, Tehsil, Renuka, district Sirmour has been regularised as water carrier against regular post. If that is so, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petitioners on the analogy of letter date 25.9.2010 whereby Mast Ram son of Smt. Jhusi Devi has been regularised as water carrier against regular post with effect from 1.4.2008. The decision towards regularisation of the petitioners shall be taken by the competent authority within a period of ten weeks after the production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner before respondent No.3. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations and discussions, made hereinabove, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 02, 2011. (sck).