IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition PIL No. 133 of 2009 Sushil Dungrakoti. .……… Petitioner Versus The Secretary, Department of Excise and others. .………. Respondents. None for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) List revised. None appeared for the petitioner in the pre-lunch session. None has appeared for the petitioner even in the post-lunch session. On the last date of hearing, i.e. on 09.11.2009, this Court passed the following order: “Sri K.N.S. Rautela, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State / respondents. We do not find any specific allegation against the respondents which would indicate that they have violated the Excise Rules. Two weeks time is allowed to the petitioner to file a supplementary affidavit indicating the alleged violation of the Rules.” Despite the aforesaid order, no supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner, indicating any violation of the rules. In view of the above, we are of the view, that there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. The writ petition is accordingly hereby dismissed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 25.03.2010 25.03.2010 G