IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.R. No. 95 of 2010 Decided on: 30.3.2011 Shri Kuldip Krishan Sood …Petitioner Versus Punjab Tourism Development Corporation …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent submits that Gulmohar Tourist Complex (Holiday Home) Ltd. has already moved an application for impleadment as Decree Holder before the executing Court. Consequently, the present civil revision is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 30, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No