IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5788 of 2011 1. BIJENDRA YADAV 2. Hanuman Yadav 3. Pitambar Yadav 4. Shyam Yadav @ Shyam Sunder Yadav …………Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 384 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners is of demanding One lacs rupees as extortion, resorting to firing and ultimately taking away Ten thousand rupees. The informant is the Up Pramukh of Barh Prakhand. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that from the FIR itself it is apparent that none received any injury and the present case has been filed in the background that the petitioners and others filed complaint case against the informant for misappropriating money of the various scheme on 8.3.2010 on which enquiry was ordered by the SDO on 11.3.2010. Thereafter a case with similar accusation being Barh P.S. Case No. 149 of 2010 was registered. After investigation the same case was found true only under Sections 341, 323 and 504/34 I.P.C. When the petitioners were granted bail on 2.6.2010 by the learned Court below then the present case was registered on 7.6.2010 making similar allegations. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the background in which the present case has been lodged clouds bonafide of the accusation, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM Barh (Patna) in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 177 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)