1 S-3 D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5507/06 (Sailendra Singh Vs. U.O.I.& Ors.) Date:- 02.08.2007 HON'BLE MR. RAJESH BALIA,J. HON'BLE MR. MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA,J. Mr. Shambhoo SIngh, for the appellant. Mr. V.K.Mathur, for the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, no interference can be made in the order passed by the Tribunal in refusing the relief in the matter of claim for reconsidering the case of the petitioner for offering appointment on compassionate ground after the death of his father while in service on 4.2.2001. The application of the petitioner was turned down on 7.3.2003 considering that his case does not fall in priority on the basis of financial status. The petitioner has, therefore, moved an application for reconsideration of the financial status on 2.2.2005. The respondents were not inclined the issue. Therefore, petitioner has filed an original application No.157/2005 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench Jodhpur after considering the material on record. The Tribunal found that the petitioner's case has not been rejected only on the ground of certain terminal benefits given to her family of the deceased. The Committee has also considered the various aspect of the matter and they have come to 2 the conclusion that his case was not as indigent as that of the others were recommended. No doubt, the letter is not so happily worded were produced before the Tribunal showed that the petitioner was not falling in the most indigent condition and the persons who were in most indigent were only recommended for appointment. In these circumstances, it is not a case in which any interference can be called for. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA),J. (RAJESH BALIA),J. arti