IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3980 of 2005 BHUVANESHWAR PRASAD SON OF LATE SHRI BAIJNATH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF DHARAMSHALA ROAD, TOWN, POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT KISHANGANJ. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DAPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, PATNA –I 3. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, PATNA –I. 4. THE B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALONAGAR, MADHEPURA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 5. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, BHUPENDRA NARAYAN MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOONAGAR, MADHEPURA 6. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOONAGAR, MADHEPURA. 7. THE L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 8. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 9. THE FINANCE OFFICER, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 10. THE PRINCIPAL, MARWARI COLLEGE, TOWN POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT –KISHANGANJ. ----------- 8. 06.07.2009 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State, copy of which has been kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and also the University. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent – University that a counter affidavit has been filed stating that all the payments made to the petitioner during the pendency of the writ application. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that - 2 - the grievance with regard to arrears of salary has not been redressed as yet. Learned counsel for the University submits that the aforesaid grievance shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner proposes to file representation before the respondent no. 5 within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such representation is filed, respondent no. 5 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the claim for arrears of salary expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed could be redressed without further delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)