SIflOi I* P""'.^^ -•:^s ^^=" ^^€1^— (2) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W,P. ISJ Np.J 141/2007 PETITIONERS /-" ..••'". ^;'^".. S^K~^ f<>--'" ...^^y ,.,.-^¥^' "^ ..f ^y^^ >>' ,r*.,i'> .^^./^ ^^ ^v" ^ .^ ^- ^' 4. /6. KishorKumarSao Aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri Jiryodhan Sao, Govt. Middle School, Kohka, Blo.-Dongargaon, Distt.-Rajanandgaon (C.G.) Balram Chandrakar Aged about 50 years, Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri Puk Lal Chandrakar, Govt. Primary School, Karamtara, Blo.-Dongargaon, Distt.-Rajanandgaon (C.G.) Toran Singh Nishad Aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, S/o Late Shri Banihar Nishad, Govt. Primary School, Badgaon, Block- Chhuria, Distt.- Rajanandgaon (C.G.) Rikhi Ram Sahu Aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri Bala Ram Sahu, Govt. Primary School, Hardi, C.R.C. -Hardi, Distt. - Rajanandgaon (C.G.) Sunil Kumar Bhagwat Aged - 41 Years, Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri B. M. Bhagwat Govt. M.H.S. School, Rajnandgaon Distt. - Rajanandgaon (C.G.) Vani Vilas Gautam Aged - 42 Years, Assistant Teacher, D/o Shri Bharat Singh Gautam Govt. Middle School, Kanharpuri, Distt. - Rajanandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS (3) VERSUS ,1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Director Lok Shikshan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y ^ ^- [GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASP1 S.B. : u9' SLE MR. SATISH K. AGNII WRIT PETITION (S.) No. 1245 of2007. Respondents Kishor K-umar Sao & Versus State CTOi.'t. ofChhattisgari Others Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for State / to3. (Passed on 8fll ofMm-ch, 2007) »- Leamed counsel appsaring for the petitioner submits that the estion of law involved in this petition is govemed by the circular dated 20.01.1987. The High Court of Madhya o) otkers has considered the issue and disposed of the said matter in following tenns:- .Inviewofthis si by Counsel for parties, this petition is disposed of by giving followiag directions. The respondent No. 1 sfaall consider petitioner's representetions referred to a'bove and dispose of the same at aii early date; preferably within a period of3 cionths trom the date of communic&tion of this order in aceorclance wrth law, keepini 2. circulars issued bv the Sta.te Govt. as also the directions given by the Tribunal in similar Leamed counsel appearing for the parties would jointiy submit aod admit tb.at this case, bei.ng similar ia nature, is square.ly covered by the decision ofthe Madhya Pradesfa High i.n the case otIndrweerSinsh 's' 3. I'! view ofths sforestated reasoos. this ostitioii is disoosed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/-. Satish KAgnihotri Judge 2004(2) M.P.H.T. 3 (NOC) Amit