IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR iseiii CONTEMPT CASE (Ct No. 5 L| /2011 PETITIONER p(63®^-"-;_„.., 0^d--^jS CONTEMNORS RESPONDENTS »-°? ^ Dronacharya Singh Thakur S/o Shri Krti Singh, aged about 41 years, R/o Village- KaramtEira, post Dadhi, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Amrit Xalkho Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur (C.G.) 1. 1^"% <7» 2. Shyam Lal Yadav (S.L. Yadav) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Sahkari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank, Durg (C.G.) 3. Gridhar Tamrakeir S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture ' and Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 4. Dr. Jai Singh Rajput S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 5. Sanjay Deshmukh S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 6. Nathmak Kothari S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture gu-id Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 7. Anup Chandrakar S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture and. Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 8. Vishal Das Kurre S/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 9. Smt. Keja Bai D/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture and Rural D.evelopment Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 10: Smt. Lata Patel D/o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) 11. Smt.'Nilima Singh TekamV^o not known to the petitioner, R/o Member District Co- operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank, District Durg (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 10. 12fiii 14 CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 03^2.2010. PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT. IN WRITPETITON (Cl No.7041/2010 DRONACHARYA SINGH THAKUR Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SBOTHERS ^ 1 s" •^^..i^v. sr"^ ^ S S--...._XI-H^22 s %%?~^ "~s" '''"'^Qi 9 ^R^ ^ & 'S^ '^W\v\t\, ^W\iS, hwwy. 1111CTI 9)WW sn^r ^^K ^.a.±..r.^..(c.2^^^1/ "^ {q^T" sn^i^r R-<i.«bsii^r sft^ - •yfin u SIT^I'?R'I%1: trit?! 2—02-2-f i| ^^TI P)^ ]^c,y!l<, (^evhjt] /cv f^ p&,fltLe^v}[ i^S^-n^J C^^^fe] ^ ^•A? p£^X^>n^ pv-<-^4 ^ (^,}H^^il ^ ^e ^eA^"^ Cei"si^-r'^ 4^e- niJ-v^i- ife^a/fct-oT, Ivia^t }n ^ ^ . . . . . DeJjti^e^ . ^e peMt^"^ M >i-r rr\'i^}-e^ .kl; h( tf}14-k^y-«fl^\ (^rAe?^^ CLec^'-y^, cbi'4^<i)Tf +ii+4(yil ^ f^l^t <F*i-wi< i73riigiT3[I^T Sd/- Manindra MohanShrivastava Judge FTft^ 7'f's"