IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46713 of 2008 1. RAM PRAKASH PODDAR 2. ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR PODDAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 16/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 307, 341, 323 and 504/34 of I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner stressfully relies on the impugned order that the injury report did not confirm the firearm injuries. He next submits that final report recommending proceedings under Sections-182 and 211 of I.P.C. against the informant came to be submitted. Learned counsel for the informant submits that he has antecedents, but does not place anything on record by way of affidavit. In the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with 2 Teghra P.S. Case No.34/02, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. On the date that he furnishes his bail- bonds, the court below shall call for his antecedent report from the Superintendent of Police, Begusarai and only in the event of a negative report shall his bail- bonds be accepted and he be released on anticipatory bail. If there be report of any antecedents of the petitioner the present application shall be deemed to have been rejected. The petitioner for that reason shall be required to be present both, on the date that his bail- bond is furnished and on the date that his antecedent report received is taken up for consideration, so that appropriate follow up action with regard to the petitioner may be taken there and then. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)