IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2010 / 27TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6315 of 2010() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.3585/2010 .................... CRIME NO.819/2008 OF VADAKKEKARA POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ APPLICANT/5TH ACCUSED ------------------------------------------------------------------ BAIJU K.K., S/O. KUTTAPPAN, PARACKAL HOUSE, KUMARANALLOOR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA - REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. .................................................... Bail Application No. 6315 of 2010 ..................................................... Dated: 18.10.2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 5th accused in Crime No.819/2008 Vadakkekara Police Station for offences punishable under Section 489A,B,C and D read with 34 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 9.12.2008. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the petitioner is the maker of the fake currency notes of the denomination of Rs.500/- by using computer techniques and the investigation is still in progress and the petitioner is an accused in yet another case of a similar nature. 3. Having regard to the grave nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the impact on the economy of the system and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj