IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3941 of 2003 Between: 1 J. Manemma W/o Hanmya Naik R/o Ram Reddypally Village, Kulkacherla Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 2 Vana Samrakshana Samithi Rep by its Chair Person; A. Buggaiah R/o Ram reddypally Village, Kulkacherla Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Special Chief Commissioner of Land Acquisition Andhra Pradesh Nampally, Hyderabad 2 the District collector Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Domalaguda, Hyderabad 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kulkacherla Mandal Ranga Reddy District 5 The Divisional Forest Officer, Hyderabad. O/o The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Aranya Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad 6 The Forest Range Officer, Pargi Ranga Reddy District 7 Gram Panchayat Mujahidpur Rep. by its Sarpanch, Mujahidpur Kulkacherla Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 8 Sri K. Harishwer Reddy MLA Pargi, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.S.SATYAM REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for Respondent No.7: AGP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a writ of mandamus to set aside notiﬁcation, dated 11.06.2002 issued by respondent No.1, by which, Survey Nos.153, 154, 156, 157 and 161 to 164 of Ramreddipally Village were proposed to be included in Mujahidpur Revenue Village. Heard Sri S.Satyam Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and perused the record. A perusal of the impugned notiﬁcation shows that the same was in the nature of a notice calling for objections from the persons interested against the proposal to include the above-mentioned survey numbers in Mujahidpur Gram Panchayat on the eve of creation of a separate Revenue Villages for Mujahidpur and Ramreddipally covering the respective Gram Panchayat areas. In my considered view, the said notice does not in any manner aﬀect the rights of the petitioners, because they are entitled to ﬁle their objections to the impugned proposal and respondent No.1 has the obligation in law to consider such objections, if any ﬁled, objectively before taking a ﬁnal decision as to whether the above mentioned survey numbers should be included in Mujahidpur Revenue Village or Ramreddipally Revenue Village. It is only in the event a decision adverse to the interests of the petitioners is taken that a cause of action will arise for the petitioners to assail such a decision. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioners to ﬁle their objections to the impugned proposal within a period of four (4) weeks from today. On receipt of such objections, respondent No.1 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders before ﬁnally notifying the Revenue Villages. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st SEPTEMBER, 2008. Note: issue copy in one (1) week. B/o kvni