(Delay Condonation Appl. No.7733 of 2013) (Review Appl. No.428 of 2013) (Intervention Appl. No.11018 of 2013) In WPSS No.1181 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hrishek Lakhera, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Anjali Bhargava, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/review applicant. No representation for the intervener. Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is 238 days’ delay in filing the review application. Delay condonation application has not been opposed by the other side. Delay in filing the review application is hereby condoned. Delay condonation application is, thus, allowed. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the review application is misconceived as the controversy involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment given by this Court in the case of Bhuwan Chandra Kandpal reported in (2005)1 UPLBEC, 6. He submitted that at the time of hearing of the case, the order was passed in the presence of Chief Standing Counsel but subsequently on misconceived advise, review application has been filed. Learned State Counsel admitted the fact that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Bhuwan Chandra Kandpal reported in (2005)1 UPLBEC, 6. In view of the above, the review application is dismissed. All pending applications stand disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) 16.04.2015 Arti