1 WP 1297/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1297 OF 2005 Suraj Gorakh Kamble ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. ----- Shri. A.B. Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. N.B. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Shri. B.L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri. G.V. Patil, holding for Shri. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent No.4. ------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 7th JULY 2009 PER COURT : 1) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not contacted or instructed the counsel since last more than 3 to 4 years. It is not known as to whether the 2 WP 1297/2005 petitioner is continuing his Engineering studies. At the initial stage ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause “D” was granted. The counsel for the petitioner is unable to say as to whether the caste claim is pending or disposed of. 2) The counsel Shri. B.L. Sagar Killarikar appearing for the Scrutiny Committee states that if the petitioner appears before the Committee, in case the caste claim is not yet decided, the Committee would decide the same within four months from the date of appearance of the petitioner. 3) The petition is pending since the year 2005. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. Ad- interim relief stands vacated. The Registry to communicate this oder to respondent No.4. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.1297.05