CF0000087945 j‘ ‘4 £lt§hw§igigowggyggm Pmmsrl AT JABALpUa / } ~ wwgtrma Crinnnal hevisivn Ng.__ m /1990 Non—appliggnt§L—1.Jugna son‘of §andoo Uragn, aged about 4O yearo, cultiVator, resident of village Turwa Aoma, Disto.Rgigarh.',o 2.The $tate o£ M.P. hEVlSlON PETITION UNDER/SECTION @92g4gl,‘ ’C&1MINAL PROCEDURE CODE. ‘ 2 _ _ 5 Applicants:_ Prem‘Sai son of Tibllo Uraon, aged about 4O years, Gurwari wife of Frem Sai, aged abcut £y, # 37 years, # Charan Sai son of Tibilb”Uraon5 aged 85‘years, ‘ g. Munni Bai wife of Charan Sai, aged- W/ about 28 years, Kheso Uraon 16%4;?g son of Tibllq4 aged about 32 years ’ j Mst: Aodo, wife of £5eoo, aged ‘xabout 26 years, kijhan son of Tibllo Uraon, aged about 40 years, 4 Raji'SOn aged' of iiblls urson, about 50 years, A11 cultivators & resicent of village t“: ?urwa $amg,tahsil ?athél Gaon, District. Raigarha Versus XX H” 78 WW,W,W . a GD\R€9§ WWW a W M WW (W) mww ammm mafaasném WW§WW éwifmm 1-3‘4—2GQ? Mn Sanjay Agrawai, coun M Anand Verma! Advd Shrivastava, comsei far nan-apgJ Mr. SR. Sahu‘ Pane} Law 'r!eam. 1 As per ihe kas‘i arder dg Magisimte, Paihafgaan was sui 2005 o? the 0f§icer Ea—charge, i has beén destmyed an 35-1 9924‘ Th§s revisicm peéxiiicm und ‘zhe Cr.P.C. ha$ been preferred ardef daéed 2-2-1993 pa$sed Raigarh in Criminaf Appea; Sasmns Judge allowing ‘Ehe rex hemin sei aside the order of ho3ding fhai mmappikant No.’ mon%hs §mm ihe daté a? amfm iiwere§ara he is enimad m‘ p05$e O¥igénai fib was ca§ied §o 3am by ithe 0%ice? inwcharge, Re has bee“ desiroyed and therefar respEmive pm'iies. § ‘ nave, ! perused the impug wder i‘t has been categoécaw himsei‘f has f1}ed rep§y ihai‘ afiear € ‘ \ ee! fw ihe appiicanis. kafe, appears an behaw of ML Ashish licant No.1. ‘fyer fOY the State/non-appiicant N02. :eed 31—3—20e5, record o7” the Executive nmonea‘. As per the fepon daied 2&8- evenue Record Room, Raigarh, record; rm acccun‘: o? eiapee cf fime. er Section 3e? read with Sec’iien 491 0‘? by the appiicen‘és beirrg aggrieved by Erie by ‘ihe ”rs‘ Additional $eesiens Judge, No.37i89, whereby learned Additionai iisiorr periiicn fiied by nen-aepiiceni No.1 ihe $ub Divisioriei Officer, Pai’neigacn herein was in possessiom within €wo ariera under Sec%ion 145 of the Cr.P.C. 351w}. r, bar es per ihe repert dared 286-2005 rehue Recerd Reom, Raigarh, ‘r‘ne record e, no other recere hee beerr predeced by gned order dated 2-1-1§Q0. in the eaici men‘iiorreci mat aepiican? No3 hereirr aking Rs.2,GOO/‘ the iane’ in questiori was ts'arisfes‘wd in the name 0f non-applicant N91 herein After scrutinizi'ng ihe evidence 9f éhe pafiies adoused m the pmceedings of Sectkm 43 CrPC , ieamed Additienai Sees ene Judge reached to the conciusion iha’: won-apwican’i No.1 hereir} was if pesseseie‘n 0f the weal in questien. 3 do not fwd any inegalify or %nfi;‘m§ty m the erder in quesiien. Therefore, there is‘eo meri? in ihis revieion, same is !iabie to be dism§seed and ii' is hereby d§smiseed. Pa‘aies, r‘ i;‘ they are si’?! a§g¥ievedj can eppmech the eivi: Com for éeciaé‘etion of we. Sd/- L.C. BHADOO T Judge xx—HC 78 WW. G3 .§%QQ9 , k ’<\ (aW Mr W m (WW) WWW ammmia: ‘ W‘HFéam WMifz‘ém %$i1%m€m%¥i