THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3811 OF 2011 ORDER : 1. The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 18.07.2011 in I.A. No.267 of 2011 in O.S. No.452 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 to send suit promissory note to the Forensic Hand-writing Expert for examination with regard to age of the ink used for the signatures of the petitioner/defendant and the age of the ink used for scribing body of the promissory note, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The respondent/plaintiff filed Original Suit No.452 of 2009 against the petitioner/defendant for recovery of money basing on a promissory note. When the suit was coming up for the evidence on defendant’s side, the present application is filed. The defence of the petitioner/defendant is that the suit promissory note was fabricated by the respondent/plaintiff in collusion with one Sri P.Jayachandra, Advocate, who obtained his signatures on blank promissory notes as a security of his fee in civil suits. Science has not so developed to determine age of the ink. The defence of the defendant that the suit promissory note was given for the purpose of security, has to be proved by the defendant in some other manner. Therefore, the trial Court rightly dismissed application and there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 09.09.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3811 OF 2011 09.09.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3811 OF 2011 DATED 09.09.2011 Between: Bandi Munaswamy …Petitioner And N.Venkatesan …Respondent