..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1065 OF 2008 Ramzan Surav Khan Pathan. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Ms.A.A.Agarwal, Adv. for applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. DATED : 22nd July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.200 of 2007 of Dehu Road Police Station, Pune. The said case is under Section 302 of IPC. 3. Eye witness Surekha Gaikwad and other eye witnesses have specifically stated that the applicant along with coaccused Sharnappa pulled the deceased Baby Nanda out of her house. Thereafter they poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. The applicant poured kerosene on the person of Baby Nanda and coaccused Sharnappa set ..(2).. her on fire. The learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that victim Baby Nanda in her statement has not named the applicant. However, the learned APP has pointed out that Baby Nanda has stated that one Ramzan Shaikh pulled her outside the house and he along with Sharnappa set her on fire. However, it is seen that four eye witnesses, including Surekha have specifically named the applicant and the role played by him. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that no TIP has been held in the present case. As far as this aspect is concerned, it is seen that the witnesses have stated the name of the applicant, hence, there is no question of holding TIP. Thereafter it was submitted that no description of the applicant has been given by any of the witnesses. As far as this aspect is concerned, it is seen that the applicant has been named by the witnesses. In such case there is no question of giving description of the applicant. The material on record clearly implicates the applicant in a crime of serious nature. Hence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Application for bail is rejected. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)