1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5858 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra .Applicant V/s. Pralhad Daulat Harale .Respondent Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, APP, for the Applicant - State None for the Respondent CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned APP for the applicant  State. 2. This is an application for leave to file an appeal against acquittal of the respondent by the learned Judicial Magistrate F. C., Pimpalgaon(b), Taluka Niphad, District Nashik for the offences punishable under Sections 127, 42(1) of the Bombay Forest Act, 1942, under Sections 1-A(2)(b)(c)(d)(h)39 of the Bombay Forest Act, 1942 and under Sections 88(1) 2 (11)(2), 52(2), 64, 66, 67, 65(a), 54, 55, 56, 58, 72, 73, 74 & 83 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The allegation was that the respondent had installed a saw mill in a field bearing Gat No.384 opposite respondent's house in village Kasbe Sukene. There is nothing to show that village Kasbe Sukene was a part of reserved forest or the saw mill within the prohibited distance from a reserved forest. In view of this, leave refused. Appeal dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)