THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 150 OF 2011 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 21.1.2011 in I.A. No.1106 of 2010 in O.P. No.935 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Hyderabad. 2. The brief facts are, the petitioner herein is wife of the respondent herein. The petitioner filed O.P. No.935 of 2009 before the court below, against the respondent for divorce. During pendency of the Original Petition, the respondent filed I.A. No.1106 of 2010 to direct the petitioner to handover Master Vijaya Avish Reddy, who is their son, to him on his third birth day i.e. on 18.1.2011, from 5.00 PM to 10.00 PM for celebrating the birth day. The trial Court, vide the impugned order, directed the petitioner herein to bring the child to Ramakrishna Mutt, Opposite to Indira Park, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad, from 2.00 PM on 30.01.2011 and the respondent was permitted to see the child between 2.00 PM to 4.00 PM. Challenging the same, the present revision is preferred by the petitioner/wife. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The apprehension of the petitioner is that there is threat to the lives of herself as well as the child. Except the bald allegation, no material is filed to substantiate the same. So, the contention of threat in the hands of the respondent cannot be accepted. Admittedly, the respondent is the father of the Ward, who is aged about 3 years. The trial court only ordered for custody of the child for only two hours on 30.01.2011 to his father. Father has every right to see his son. Therefore, the trial Court rightly ordered the petition. 5. But, having regard to the circumstances of the case, instead of at Ramakrishna Mutt, the petitioner is directed to bring the ward to the residence of Smt. D.Pramada, Advocate (who is present here and agreed therefor) at 3.30 PM on 30.01.2011, and the respondent can see and spend with the ward from 3.30 PM to 5.30 PM in the residence of Smt. D.Pramada, Advocate. 6. With the above modification, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 29.1.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 150 OF 2011 29.1.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 150 OF 2011 29.1.2011 Between: J.R.M. Sravanthi …Petitioner And Anjireddy Vijay Rahul Reddy …Respondent