HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR W.P.No.3881 of 2011 Dated: 09-03-2011 Between: Ms. Sk Afrin Sultana …Petitioner AND The Registrar, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR W.P.No.3881 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) In this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to appoint her to the post of Typist or Junior Assistant in pursuance of employment notification No.1/2010/Estt. Dated 1.11.2010 by relaxing the age of the petitioner by 65 days. When the writ petition was taken up for admission on 18.2.2011 this Court pointed out that the appointment is governed by State and Subordinate Service Rules and does not fall under A.P. Judicial Ministerial Service Rules, and Section 2(c) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 excludes the jurisdiction of the Tribunal against any officer or servant of the Supreme Court or of any High Court or Courts subordinate thereto and the Wakf Tribunal is not administratively subordinate to the High Court, which does not have any control over the staff of the Wakf Tribunal on administrative side, and therefore, the petitioner has to first approach the Tribunal in view of law declared by the Apex Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others [(1997) 3 SCC 261] but he cannot directly approach this Court by way of the present writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner sought for time and hence, the matter was adjourned to 21.2.2011 on which date there was no representation. In spite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for orders’ on 1.3.2011, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner in spite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Since the post in which the petitioner sought to be appointed does not fall under the A.P. Judicial Ministerial Service Rules, the present writ petition cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedies available to her before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs. ________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. __________________ MARCH 09, 2011 N.RAVI SHANKAR, J. Tsr.