IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45239 of 2010 RAJESH KUMAR, S/O- DIWAKAR SHARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NEETU KUMARI, D/O- SOMESHWAR PRASAD 3. DHIRAJ KUMAR, S/O- DIWAKAR SHARAN. ----------- 2 26.03.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is husband. He has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a complaint case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 498A and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. As per allegation in the complaint, the marriage was solemnized in the year 2004. Soon thereafter demand was made on behalf of the petitioner and other family members for purchase of a flat at Delhi. It is also the prosecution case that after some time, she was taken to Delhi where cruelty was perpetrated on her and ultimately she was dropped at Bettiah Railway Station on 3.1.2008 asking her to go to her parental house. Learned counsel submits the while the petitioner was away in connection with his employment in Delhi, the complainant developed illicit relation with his brother. He has filed a suit seeking divorce in Delhi on 4.6.2008 which was not held maintainable at Delhi by order dated 2.1.2010 as contained in Annexure-2 whereafter the petitioner filed a complaint at Bettiah. It appears from the prosecution case that the victim was carried to Delhi and 2 there also she was subjected to torture at the hands of the petitioner. Having regard to the allegations contained in the complaint and the materials reflected from the impugned order, this Court is satisfied that no case for anticipatory bail is made out. It is accordingly rejected. Let the petitioner surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and apply for regular bail which shall be considered and disposed in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)