THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR REVIEW WAMP.Nos. 1098 & 1097 OF 2013 IN WRIT APPEAL NOs. 1082 AND 1084 OF 2011 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao) W.A.No.1082 of 2011 has been disposed of by a Division Bench comprising of Justice Ghulam Mohammed and one of us (NRR,J) by an order passed on 23.11.2011, recording the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that the issue in the said appeal is also squarely covered by the judgment rendered by another Division Bench in W.A.No.110 of 2011 & batch of cases which were passed on 23.10.2011. Hence, following the said judgment and for the reasons given therein, W.A.No.1082 of 2011 along with W.A.No.1084 of 2011 were disposed of. As it transpired, the appellants have approached the Supreme Court against the judgment dated 23.09.2011 in W.A.No.110 of 2011 & batch and the Supreme Court by its order dated 07.05.2012 granted liberty to the appellant to go back to the High Court and file a review, if it is so advised, as regards payment of compensation. Accordingly, the said review applications have been moved bearing Rev.WAMP Nos. 2100 of 2012 & batch. Those review miscellaneous petitions were heard by a Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice V. Eswaraiah & Hon’ble Justice K. G. Shankar and their Lordships by the order dated 28.01.2013 allowed the Review WPMPs modifying the earlier order of reinstatement of the workmen into service by ordering for payment of a lumpsum amount of Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation in lieu of reinstatement with continuity of service benefit. In view of this subsequent order dated 28.01.2013 in a batch of Review WPMPs, the present review applications are moved in W.A.Nos.1082 & 1084 of 2011. It stands to reason that the same order which was passed by the Division Bench which heard and decided the batch of Review WAMPs by its order dated 23.10.2011 shall also be the order in the present case, inasmuch as, the main writ appeal was in fact disposed of following the judgment rendered in the main W.A.No.110 of 2010 & batch of cases. When that order itself has been reviewed, subsequently, it is only proper that the present writ appeals also shall fall in line and the order passed in those review applications should hold the field in these two cases also. Accordingly, both these Review WAMPs are allowed. Order passed in W.A.No.1082 & 1084 of 2011 is set-aside to the extent of reinstatement into service of the workman is concerned and it is made clear that the appellants shall offer, instead, a lumpsum amount of Rs.1,50,000/- in lieu of reinstatement of the workman with benefit of continuity of service. 30 days time is granted to the appellants to draw on any nationalized bank a demand draft in a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- payable at par in the name of the workman concerned and shall disburse the same under registered post with acknowledgment due to the address where the workman is currently residing. With this, both the review petitions stand allowed. _______________________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO ___________________________ JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR 02.04.2015 sp