IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.667 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.667 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.667 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.91 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.91 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.91 OF 2006 IN IN IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 610 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 610 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 610 OF 2005 IN IN IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.404 OF 2004 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.404 OF 2004 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.404 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.874 OF 2001 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.874 OF 2001 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.874 OF 2001 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2061 OF 2001 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2061 OF 2001 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2061 OF 2001 Sudarshan Kumar Luthra .. Applicant V/s Pravin Padamshi Gada & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.O.A.Das for the Applicant. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondents though served. The learned Counsel for the Applicant undertakes to file affdiavit of service. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 47 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)