IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1302 of 2006 VIRENDRA THAKUR Versus ANJU DEVI ----------- 2 29.07.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order granting Rs. 1000/- per month as maintenance to the wife opposite party is neither excessive nor illegal. That apart, when this has come on record that the petitioner/husband has also a luxury of having a second wife during the subsistence of the marriage with the opposite party, the first wife, this Court even otherwise would not find any reason for interfering with the impugned order. Accordingly, there is no merit in this application and the same is dismissed. The Court below is directed to ensure that both the arrears and current the amount of maintenance be realized from the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is dismissed. BCJ (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)