IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8263 of 2009 WAIBHAW KUMAR, son of Ashok Kumar Gupta at present C/O Lalou Prasad Gupta, Pathar Ki Masjid, Tekari Road, P.O. Mahendra, P.S. Sultanganj, District- Patna Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi 2. The Secretary, Central Board of Secondary Education, Government of India, New Delhi 3. The Secretary (A.I.E.E.E. Unit), Central Board of Secondary Education, Government of India 4. The Secretary, Central Counseling Board, C.B.S.E., New Delhi 5. The Regional Director, A.I.C.T.E., Eastern Zone, Kanpur, U.P. ----------- For the Petitioner :M/s Pramod Misrha & Pramod Kr. Mishra, Advocates For the A.I.C.T.E. :Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate 02/ 20.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner appeared in the All India Engineering/ Architecture Entrance Examination (AIEEE)-2009 conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the CBSE), as would appear from his admit card, Annexure-1 to this application. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he belongs to O.B.C. category, as has been certified by the District Magistrate, Patna in his certificate dated 19.6.2008, Annexure-3 series, yet the petitioner has not been considered for being admitted in the National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology, Ranch, Jharkhand, although the candidates in the O.B.C. category who secured lesser marks than him in the O.B.C. category has been recommended for such admission. 4. Let the petitioner represent before the Secretary, CBSE, Respondent no.4 along with a certified copy of this order, 2 who should consider the same and pass reasoned order indicating the reasons in brief as to why petitioner has not been recommended for such admission. Necessary order in this regard be passed as early as possible, in any case within three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. It goes without saying that if the representation is allowed, petitioner shall be admitted in the aforesaid course. 6. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)