CRM No. M 20445 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 20445 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.07.2010 Vinod Kumar and others ........ Petitioner Versus State of U T and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. APS Deol, Advocate with Mr. Daldeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D D Sharma, APP for the U T Chandigarh -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) CRM No. 38368 of 2010 This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for placing on record the true translation of the FIR. Application is allowed. A copy of the true translation of the FIR (R-1) is taken on record. Main case It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that earlier FIR No. 247 dated 20.06.2010 under Section 323, 452, 506, 147, 148 CRM No. M 20445 of 2010 2 of Indian Penal Code, Police Section 39, Chandigarh was registered against the petitioners. They were arrested in the aforesaid FIR under the said Sections. However, they were released on bail vide order dated 22.06.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh. Thereafter, Suresh Kumar died on 23.06.2010 and an offence punishable under Section 304 IPC was added. Accordingly, the petitioners filed the present application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 304 IPC in the same FIR in which they were earlier taken into judicial custody. Mr. D D Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for UT, Chandigarh, on instructions from ASI Paramjit Singh, although did not dispute the above said position and stated that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner, pleaded that they were in judicial custody only for one day and were released as the injured was alive. Moreover, the petitioners are not appearing in the Court and notices have also been issued to the surety. No ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. However, taking into account the fact that nothing is needed to be recovered from them, they are directed to appear before the trial Court and in case application for bail in the offence under Section 304 IPC is filed within one week from today, the same shall be decided on merit within four days. The petitioners shall not be arrested till the filing of the application. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 29.07.2010 mohan