032% (Writ Peu'tion Under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shn' Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Praveen K. Dhuxandhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 6th Day of November, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appean'ng for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner prays tor Withdrawal of this peu’ubn with libelty to make an appropriate application before the concerned authon‘ty for inclusion of his name in the voter list of Gurur, Dishict Durg. However, the concerned authority may be directed to consider and decide the application, in accordance With‘Iaw, on its own merits, within sn‘pulated period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/ State has no objection to the above submission. 3. In View of the fomgoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above-stated liberty. Consequently, M(W)P No. 46 16] 2004 is also dismissed. However, the concerned authority is directed to consider and decide the application, if any, in‘ accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of one month nom the date of receipt of the application. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotrii' Judge [W 5W o? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’l‘l‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Wn’t Petition No. 4256 of 2004 Petitioner Isha Prakash Sahu, S/o Han' Ram Sahu, aged about 38 years, R/o‘Gurur, Ward No.6, Dist. Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State ‘ of Chhattisgar, Thmugh Chief Secmtary, Office situated at Secmtan'at, Raipur (CG) 2. Collector, Durg (Registrar Election), oi£ce situated at Durg (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional OE’cer, Balod (Delegated Registmr, Election), O$ce situated at Balod, Dist, Burg (13.6%.). 4. Tahsildar, Gurur (Sub—Regisnar Election), Oilce situatedrat Gurur, Dist. Durg (C.G.) ‘