:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2243 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2245 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NOS. 414/2006 AND 416/2006 Hanumant Arvind Gangatirkar. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ........ Ismail L. Shaikh. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ........ The Sangli Salary Earners’ Co. Op. Soc. Ltd. ..Applicant/Intervener). And Hanumant Arvind Gangatirkar. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .......... The Sangli Salary Earners’ Co.op. Soc. Ltd. ..Applicant/Intervener). And Ismail Lalahmed Shaikh. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. Umesh Mankapure i/by J.Shekhar & Co. for the applicants. Mr. Rajesh More, APP. for the State. Mr. Pratap Patil for the Intervener. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 28/6/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. :2: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The replies tendered by the A.P.P. are taken on record. 3. These are anticipatory bail applications made by two clerks of the Salary Earners Co.op. Society Ltd. On perusing the F.I.R. lodged by the Chairman of the society, it is clear that he had appointed Chartered Accountant and found that there is misappropriation of amount of Rs.8,28,735/-. These two applicants were working as clerks at the relevant time. The amount is yet to be recovered. The Branch Manager who was refused anticipatory bail is absconding. In my view, not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, both the applications are rejected. 4. In view of the above order, the intervention applications made by the society do not survive and therefore, disposed of. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)