IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGAR WRTT PETmON N0. S2^ /2006. SfMGLE BEMCH PETITIQNER: ^b ..••'. ./• villag ^^- ^ .***V\ vl**1 -•**' ...•••"'G.<y;b-"" «^'RohitKumar Verma, S/o Dayalu Ram Verma, aged abo'ut 42 years, residence of village Lodhikapri, Post Parasbode, Tahsil District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ,,<^S;(J>- ^''^''^•t '^1 Respondents ^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministiy D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Officer, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Bemetara, Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIR^CTIONS. XI-HC-78 ^ *flwn shHivti 3^'sipn^pr^ s9Tf1wi6, Riciiyy ..w?^..^.^ l^ ^ 200 3<i^i Mach (liFl'd'!l<i?r) 3fI^TWR-fi* craT3:ii^?ra»< Baive y/ -y. gTarwHfscT^n^T 5,7.2006 Shri O.P. Sahu, counsel for the| Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govj advanoe copy. Heard both the counsel. 8y this petition, the petitioner grant two additional increments to the situated persons and 18% interest be ^ Learned counsel for the application on 15-6-2006 stating that| which is being given to others may application is Annexure-P/4. He order in a similar oase i.e. W.P. No.21 Chtiattisgarh and others) directi'ng res( has obtained degree of B. Ed. on his pass the order for grant of two adv^ Annexure-P/6. He further submitted i.e. the District Education Offioer, Bemj petitioner to wliich leamed counsel for Having heard learned counsel| faots and oircumstances ofthe case, w<i of the case, respondent No.3 is direql and if he is satisfied that the petjtionef for two advanoe increments, then accordance with law. • Wjth the dlreotion aforesaid, th^ *i'ifi-i-'fl-f ·<itidTfffei.Il (Riwi ^sif^Tsn^r 'petitioner. . Advooate, for the State/respondents, on h^s prayed that respondents be directed to (^etitioner as has been granted to sjmifarly ^lso paid. submitted that the petitioner made an the benefit of two additional inorements pe given to the petitioner. Copy of the that this Court has passed an f55/2006 (Smt. Deepti Mishra V. State of int No.3 therein that ifthe petitioner sjiwn oost, then respondent No.3 therein to ance increments. Copy of the order is t^at in the cireumstarices, respondent No.3 rtara be directed to decide the case ofthe I'espondents has no objection. |for the parties and having regard to the [ithout expressing any opinion on the merit (ed to examine the case of the petitioner, is entitled as per the Government Policy |he shouid pass appropriate order, in petitio^ier furthd- submitted resbonds triat petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.^hado° ]udge