1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8199 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Thankavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Distirct. 3. The Inspector of Police, Edayakottai Police Station, Dindigul District. 4. Manivel 5. Dhandapani, S/o.Malaichippa Gounder 6. Kanthasamy 7. Dhandapani, S/o.Muthusamy Gounder 8. Ananthiappan 9. Velusamy ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.06.2011 and to take appropriate action pursuant to the same within a stipulated period that may be specified by this Court. For Petitioner ... Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.D.Venkatesh for R4 to R9 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.06.2011 and to take appropriate action pursuant to the same within a stipulated period that may be specified by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Heard Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.D.Venkatesh, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 9. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. At the outset itself, this Court is not inclined to go into the issue raised by the petitioner as this matter is inter se between the petitioner and the third parties relating to participation in the temple festival. 5. However, on notice, the respondents 4 to 9 appeared through the learned Counsel and stated that the temple festival is going to be conducted on 14.09.2011 and there is no impediment for the petitioner to participate in the same. 6. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that the allegation of ex-communication of the petitioner is not correct. The police shall ensure protection of all the devotees without any discrimination. 7. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Distirct. 3.The Inspector of Police, Edayakottai Police Station, Dindigul District. +1 CC to Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Advocate (SR.No.31221) W.P.(MD)No.8199 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 13.09.2011 rsb NSV/13.9.11/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/