THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15207 of 2008 ORDER: Although the matter is listed under the caption ‘interlocutory’, at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for hearing and being disposed of by this order. In the Writ Petition, petitioner is questioning the action of respondents 1 to 3 in not taking steps against the fourth respondent pursuant to notice, dated 03.06.2008 issued under Section 462 of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’). It is the case of the petitioner that though the fourth respondent is making constructions after issuing notice under Section 462 of the Act, no further steps have been taken by respondents 1 to 3. During pendency of the Writ Petition, it appears that final notice was issued to the fourth respondent for removal of unauthorized construction under Section 636 of the Act and further steps were also taken for removing the unauthorized structures. In view of issuance of notice to the fourth respondent under Section 636 of the Act and further steps taken by respondents 1 to 3 for removing the unauthorized structures, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that no further adjudication is necessary in the Writ Petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th AUGUST, 2011. kvni