IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 147 of 2011(U) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33564/2010 Dated 02/02/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: ---------------------- VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VENGOLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, VENGOLA P.O, PERUMBAVOOR-683 554. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS:WRIT PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 --------------- 1. NOORJAHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.IBRAHIM, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THENGOD, KAKKANAD-683 554. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR P.O, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683642. 3. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM RURAL, ALUVA-683 101. 4. RAJU, S/O.VAYARONI, KUZHIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, ARAKKAPPADY VILLAGE, VENGOLA P.O, PERUMBAVOOR-683 554. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA ADVOCATE SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** R.P.No.147 of 2011 in W.P(C) No.33564 of 2010-U ***************************** Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2011 ORDER BASANT, J. Heard. Review Petition is allowed. The judgment dated 02.02.2011 in W.P(c) No.33564 of 2010 is recalled. The review petitioner is impleaded as additional 4th respondent in the Writ Petition. The learned counsel for the review petitioner/additional 4th respondent submits that the averments in the review petition may be reckoned as the contentions/counter statements of the additional 4th respondent in the Writ Petition also. That request is accepted. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent herein/writ petitioner submits that counter affidavit in the review petition may be reckoned as reply affidavit of the petitioner in the Writ Petition. Call W.P(c) No.33564 of 2010 on 09.03.2011. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/ 2