IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2011 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 8818 of 2011(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAFIA, W/O.SULAIMAN K.M., AGED 47 YEARS, VADAKANGADI HOUSE, PULLUTTU NORTH P.O., KODUNGALLOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001. 2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KODUNGALLOOR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULLUTTU VILLAGE OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001. 4. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KODUNGALLOOR BRANCH, KODUNGALLOOR REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER-680 664. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN FOR R4 SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH FOR R4 SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR FOR R4 SRI.MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 8818 of 2011(B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- P1 :- COPY OF THE BANK STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. P2 :- COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 4th RESPONDENT P3 :- COPY OF THE DEMAND PRIOR TO ATTACHMENT NTOICE P4 :- COY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE u/s.7 OF R.R. ACT P5 :- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2nd RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE ami/ C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 8818 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T Considering the statutory remedy available under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), this Court was not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, as gesture of indulgence, further recovery steps were stayed through an order dated 21.3.2011, subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.1 lakh, within two weeks thereof. Subsequently, on the basis of an application filed by the petitioner, the time stipulated for payment was extended till 25.4.2011, subject to condition of payment of a further sum of Rs.1 lakh on or before 25.5.2011. 2. It is conceded by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, no amount has been paid till date in compliance of the interim orders. 3. Under such circumstances, I am not inclined to 2 W.P.(C).No. 8818 of 2011 entertain this writ petition any further, in order to exercise the discretionary jurisdiction vested on this Court. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, Judge ami/