THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CRL.P.NO.1820 OF 2008 ORDER:- This application is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.11 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Adoni. On a complaint given by complainant/LW.1, the police have registered a case in Cr.No.118 of 2007 under Sections.506 and 509 IPC and after investigation the police have filed a charge sheet, which is numbered as C.C.No.11 of 2008. The substance of the complaint is that there are disputes with regard to property and the property of the complainant is said to be in possession and enjoyment of Accused No.1 and when she claimed the properties, it was not given and there was said to be threat to her and to her husband and she filed a suit and keeping in mind on 11-101-2007 the accused came and dragged the complainant from outside and threatened her to kill. The accused are threatening due to money and political power and consequently she wanted action to be taken. The police during the investigation have recorded the statements of LWs.1 to 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the allegations in the complaint are very vague and even the charge sheet, which was filed by the police after investigation is also very vague in order to attract any of the offence under Section 506 and 509 IPC and on the other hand the grievance of the complainant was shown as the accused did not allow the complainant to take her properties and as she filed the suit, the accused have telephoned and threatened her with dire consequences. In fact, this part of the allegation in the charge sheet is not alleged by the complainant. The date or the time as to when such threats were given are also not specifically mentioned in order to attract the offence under Section 506 IPC. It is essential to prove that there shall be criminal intimidation to cause threat of life or grievous injury and in order to attract Section 509 IPC, it is necessary that there should be words or gestures intended to insult the modesty of a woman. In fact, the charge sheet does not show as to on what date the said offence was committed by the accused persons. The investigation is not disclosing sufficient material and the allegations are vague. The complaint is also vague about the particulars of the acts committed by the accused. Evidently, the complainant has filed a suit for recovery of possession of property, which is in dispute and the present complaint appears to be the acts to coerce the accused for a settlement and it appears to be apparently an abuse of process of law. In view of the above circumstances, the petition is liable to be allowed. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused in C.C.No.11 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Adoni are quashed. _______________________ N.R.L. NĀGESWARA RĀO,J 03-11-2011 TSNR