IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.67 of 2007 IMTEYAZ AHMAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 28.7.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that initially the case has been filed for quashing of the F.I.R. Now the petitioner states that he has filed amendment petition for quashing of the order taking cognizance. Learned counsel submits that there is a bonafide land disputeand as such no case under section 379 of I.P.C. is made out. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that this criminal writ application would not be maintainable and the petitioners ought to file a quashing application against order taking cognizance.I am in agreement with the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to convert this writ application into one of Cr.Miscellaneous application under section 482 of Cr.P.C. AnilK.sinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)