IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.802 OF 2003 Gadkari Santosh Shivmurti & Anr. ...Petitioners. Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation Servants Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. ...Respondent. .... Mr. P.M. Muddar for the Petitioner. Mr. K.S. Bapat for the Respondent. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. April 22, 2008. P.C.: The petition is directed against an order passed by the Industrial Court in a revision against an order of the Labour Court dismissing two complaints of unfair labour practices filed by the Petitioners. The Petitioners were employed in a temporary capacity on 12th May 1986 and on 19th October 1986. A resolution was passed by the Board of Directors of the Respondent which is a Co-operative Bank for the termination of the services of the two Petitioners, amongst 13 clerks who were recruited by the Bank. The Petitioners moved the Co-operative Court on 24th October 1986 and an ad- interim order restraining the Bank from terminating their services was passed on 28th October 1986. The order was vacated on 4th January 1988 upon which, the services of the Petitioners were terminated on 5th January 1988. The Petitioners were admittedly appointed as temporary employees. The Petitioners remained in service between 28th October 1986 and 4th January 1988 only as a result of an injunction which was granted by the Co-operative Court which was eventually vacated. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners has not disputed the factual position that the Petitioners were appointed purely as temporary employees. Similarly, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners has fairly accepted that retrenchment compensation was paid when the termination was effected. In this view of the matter, neither the order of the Labour Court, nor the order of the Industrial Court in revision can be regarded as suffering from any infirmity. No case is made out for exercising the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is accordingly dismissed. ......