THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.2261 of 2009 ORDER: Aggrieved by the order dated 02.04.2009 passed in I.A.No.41 of 2009 in O.S.No.1068 of 2001 on the file of the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge’s Court (Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner herein laid the suit O.S.No.1068 of 2001 before the Court below, against respondent Nos.1 to 13 herein, seeking a preliminary decree for partition of the suit schedule property and allotment of 1/16th share to him out of the share of defendant No.1. When the suit was at the stage of arguments, he filed the present petition I.A.No.41 of 2009 praying the Court below to implead the proposed parties i.e. respondent Nos.14 to 36 therein as defendants 14 to 36 in the suit and it was his case that defendant No.7 executed registered sale deeds in favour of the proposed parties in respect of the suit schedule property and therefore they are necessary parties to the suit. Defendant No.10 resisted the said petition by filing counter. The Court below, after detailed consideration of the matter, dismissed the petition, by the order under revision. Heard the learned counsel on record and perused the order under revision and other material made available on record. It is to be seen that the suit is filed in the month of December 2001 and the record reveals that respondent Nos.7 to 9 filed their written statement in the month of August 2002 itself, wherein they have categorically asserted that the suit schedule property was sold to various persons by way of registered sale deeds in the month of July 2001 i.e. much prior to filing of the suit, and that the petitioner-plaintiff, though aware of the said fact, has purposely not impleaded the purchasers as parties to the suit. Even if it is assumed that, at the time of filing of the suit, the petitioner was not aware of the sale of suit schedule property to third parties and therefore he could not implead those purchasers as parties to the suit, he could have at least taken steps to implead them, immediately after going through the written statement of defendants 7 to 9, which was filed long back in the year 2002, but he did not do so, and having kept quiet for a long period of seven years and when the suit is at the stage of arguments, he came up with the present petition, seeking impleadment of the purchasers of the suit schedule property as party defendants to the suit. It is also brought to the notice of the Court that the defendants got marked the documents, indicating sale of suit schedule property to third parties, as Exs.B20 to B33, in the year 2008 itself, and despite that, the petitioner has not taken any steps to implead the purchasers. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that there are no bona fides on the part of the petitioner in filing the present application belatedly at the stage when the suit is coming up for arguments. The Court below has rightly dismissed the present application, by the order under revision, which warrants no interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The civil revision petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 23rd April, 2010 IBL