IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29316 of 2011 1. Ranjeet Yadav, son of Arjun Yadav 2. Ravindra Yadav, son of Bhuna Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 24.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 504, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner No. 1 assaulted the Informant with sword on his head on account of which there was a hair-line fracture, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner No. 1 at this stage. The prayer for bail of petitioner No. 1 is rejected. However, since the occurrence took place on account of a minor dispute, the petitioner No. 1 may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated. With regard to petitioner No. 2, since injury attributed to him was found on non vital part, let the petitioner No. 2 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 68 of 2011, G.R. No. 662 of 2011, subject to the following conditions: (i) 2 That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)