IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2011 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 926 of 2011(M) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINOD P., UPSA, THIRUVANGOOR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THIRUVANGOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VADAKARA 4. THE MANAGER, THIRUVANGOOR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THIRUVANGOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. (NAME OF R3 CHANGED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.1715/2011 DT.1.2.2011) R1 TO R3 BY G.P. SMT. M.R. SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONERs EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF R3 EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR DT.25.3.2009 EXT.P4-TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF R2 DT.20.10.2009 EXT.P5-TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF R1 DATED 26.6.2010 EXT.P6-TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT.4.12.2010 EXT.P7-TRUE COPY OF GO DATED 15.6.2004 EXT.P8-TRUE COPY OF GO DATED 10.6.2006 EXT.P9-TRUE COPY OF GO DATED 26.2.2011 // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 926 of 2011-M - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of April, 2011. JUDGMENT The matter relates to the challenge against approval granted to the appointment of the petitioner on daily wage basis for different periods covered by the impugned orders which are produced as Exts.P5, P6 and P9. 2. The appointment of the petitioner was approved on daily wages in the light of G.O.(P) No.169/04/G.Edn. dated 15.6.2004 and G.O.(P) No.104/08/G.Edn. dated 10.6.2008. 3. Along with I.A. No.5891/2011 the petitioner has produced Ext.P9, a copy of G.O.(P) No.56/11/G.Edn. dated 26.2.2011 whereby the above Government Orders have been modified and appropriate directions have been issued with regard to the approval of appointment. The petitioner seeks for the benefit of the said Govt. Order. Exts.P2, P3 and P4 orders will show that there is total rejection of approval of the appointment. The Government by Ext.P5, directed to approve the appointments for the period from 19.7.2006 to 31.3.2007 on daily wage basis and from 1.6.2007 on scale of pay basis. For enabling the Government to take a fresh decision, the impugned order Exts.P5 to the wpc 926/2011 2 extent to which the appointment is approved on daily wage basis for the period from 19.7.2006 to 31.3.2007, is quashed. In other respects it is not interfered with. Appropriate orders will be passed after hearing the petitioner in the light of Ext.P9 Govt. Order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/