IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28969 of 2009 1. KAMLESH PRASAD 2. SUDHA DEVI 3. BABLU @ BALLU 4. SARVADEO LAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.09.2009 Let it be recorded that the present application as against petitioner no.4, namely Sarvadeo Lal has become infructuous as he has been arrested during the pendency of the application. Petitioners have approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 498A of the Penal Code. Petitioner nos. 1, 2, and 3 are in-laws. It is contended that the direct allegation is against the husband. The complainant and husband were residing at Bangalore. It is next contended that the husband of the complainant is already in custody. The allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner nos. 1,2 and 3, namely, Kamlesh Prasad, Sudha Devi and Bablu @ Ballu, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 04 weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Rohtas Sasaram in connection with 2 Sasaram (T) P.S.Case no. 523 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)