IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11794 of 2009 Date of decision: 08.09.2011 Amarjit Singh ....Petitioner Versus The Punjab State and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Amit Jhanji, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Mr. Jaswinder Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, has fairly stated that petitioner entered into the disputed premises as a lessee, therefore, before initiating proceedings of eviction, termination of his lease is required, as provided under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. Learned State counsel states that let present petition be allowed and eviction petition be dismissed with liberty to the State to initiate fresh proceedings after issuing notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, present petition stands allowed. Impugned orders passed stand set aside. However, respondents shall be at liberty to initiate fresh proceedings after termination of the lease of the petitioner in accordance with law. (Alok Singh) Judge September 08, 2011 R.S.