IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37350 of 2011 1. Santosh Tiwari, Son of Mitthu Tiwari. 2. Dhiraj Tiwari, Son of Anil Tiwari. All resident of village-Siswa, P.S.-Daudpur, District-Chhapra ………Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ……….Opp. Party. ----------- 2 14.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The name of the petitioner has transpired in course of investigation in a case registered for the offence under Section 379/311 of the Indian Penal Code. The boy from whom the stolen mobile set has been recovered has named the petitioner as one of the accused who escaped with the amount snatched from the informant. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is, hereby, rejected. In case, the petitioners surrender and seek bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 305 of 2010, pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Darbhanga, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced in any manner by order of this Court. Sanjeet/ (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)