WP(C) 1797/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. MG Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. AK Sarka r, learned Standing Counsel, NF Railway, appearing on behalf of respondents. The petitioner has been working with Railway Protection Special Force (RPSF), as a Constable since the year 1999 and he is presently posted as a Constable in 4t h Battalion, RPSF, New Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. The petitioner was declared unfi t due to colour blindness. The petitioner has accordingly been placed on superan nuary post in the 4th Battalion, RPSF, New Jalpaiguri, West Bengal. On having be en declared unfit due to colour blindness and having been reduced into category of fitness, the petitioner made a representation, dated 14-07-2004, addressed to the respondent No. 3, namely, Inspector General, Railway Protection Special For ce, New Delhi, for an alternative job under the NF Railway, Lumding Division. In terms of the various guidelines, which have been issued in this regard, the res pondent No. 6, namely, Divisional Railway Manager (P), NF Railway, Lumding, pass ed an order, on 17-02-2009, clearing the petitioner for posting, as a Coaching C lerk, at DMR/Agartala. By the letter, dated 17-02-2009, aforementioned, responde nt No. 6 also clarified that the petitioner may be directed to undergo the initi al training before his absorption as a Coaching Clerk. By the said letter, dated 17-02-2009, communicated to the respondent No. 4, the respondent No. 4 was acco rdingly requested to spare the petitioner and direct him to appear, for his trai ning, as indicated in the letter, dated 17-02-2009, aforementioned. Despite the letter, dated 17-02-2009 aforementioned and a representation already , made, in this regard, by the petitioner to the respondent No. 4, the responden t No. 4 has not yet released the petitioner. In consequence thereof, the petitio ner has not been able to report, at ZRTI/APDJ, for initial training before being absorbed as Coaching Clerk at DMR/Agartala. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent No. 4, the petitioner has, now, file d this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking is suance of appropriate direction(s) to be issued to the respondents, in general, and to the respondent No. 4, namely, Commanding Officer, 4th Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, New Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, in particular. Appearing on behalf of the respondents, Mr. Sarkar, learned counsel, submits tha t because of certain official formalities, the petitioner’s release from the 4th Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, could not be effected and that the process is in progress to release the petitioner as required in the present cas e so as to enable the petitioner report for training. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is dispo sed of with direction to the respondents, particularly, the respondent No. 4, na mely, Commanding Officer, 4th Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, New J alpaiguri, West Bengal, to do the needful in accordance with law as regards rele ase of the petitioner from the 4th Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, so as to enable the petitioner report for training in order to facilitate the pe titioner’s absorption as a Coaching Clerk. The whole exercise, so directed, shal l be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy o f this order by the respondent No. 4. The petitioner may furnish to the responde nt No. 4 a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition a nd annexure thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the respondents. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall stand dispo sed of.