IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2008 / 20TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 18110 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHAMEER, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.MAJEED KUTTY SHEEBA MANZIL, KIZHAVOOR, MUKATHALA P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.L.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY BOARD OF PUBLIC EXAMINATION, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR GOVERNMENT EXAMINATIONS, POOJAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR GOVERNMENT EXAMINATIONS, PARIKSHA BHAVAN, POOJAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 18110 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, the petitioner sought the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent to scrutinize the papers in the presence of the petitioner as applied to by the petitioner in Ext. P3 as expeditiously as possible. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P3 application submitted by the petitioner.” 2. Earlier, the petitioner approached this Court seeking revaluation of his answer papers by filing W.P(C) No. 8975/2008, which was dismissed. Thereafter, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition. He has not produced any material in support of his contentions in the writ petition. But the petitioner asserted before me that the scrutiny of his answer papers was without the answer papers and the respondents do not have his answer papers in their possession. In view of the categoric assertion, I asked the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether the petitioner is prepared to pay costs of Rs.15,000/-, if the assertion of the petitioner is found incorrect. After getting instructions from his client, counsel for the petitioner submitted before me that if the petitioner's assertion is found to be incorrect, the petitioner is prepared to pay costs of Rs. 15,000/-. On that condition, I directed the learned Government Pleader to produce the answer papers of the petitioner. 3. Today, the learned Government Pleader produced the answer papers of the petitioner. It was perused by the petitioner himself and he admits that those are his papers. That being so, the assertion made by the petitioner is found to be incorrect. Naturally, he is liable to pay the costs for the inconvenience caused to this Court and the respondents. Accordingly, I dismiss this writ petition with costs of Rs. 15,000/- payable to the respondents. The costs shall be paid within W.P.C. No. 18110/2008 -: 2 :- one month from today. The answer papers are returned to the learned Government Pleader. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.