[^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.l WRIT PETITION N0. /2004 PET1TIONER ^A^ /\^w l^f^ ^t^ ,.-:A%/" . .<^ <^/ RESPONDENTS -rCT^^^ Y^'l'/ y^ M/s. J. P. Agrawal, A registered Firm- Head Office- Amarkantak, Distt: Shahdol, through its Partner, Shri Gayaprasad Agrawal, Aged about 39 years, S/o Late Shri J.P.Agrawal, R/0 Amarkantak Road, Pendra, District: Bilaspur (C.G.). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Housing, Urban Administrative and Environmental, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Collector, Bilaspur, Distt.: Bilaspur (C.G.). S.The Nagar Panchayat, Gaurella, Through the Chief Municipal Officer, Gaurella, Pendra, Distt.: Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. M/s. New Narmada Transport Co.,Pendra Road through its Proprietor Sukdev Singh, R/0 Amarkantak Road, Pendra, Distt. : Bilaspur (C.G.). ,/' /' /" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 3TT^^T^T f^TT^3T^T ^iW^cT t\ ^ ^. ../ ^^ v^ '^ ^ ^" 3^ ^n^M4, SxftWT^, Rl<rll1M^< ?^ ^WWS^RI^ ^ 200 W^T^cH'W^cT 19.7.2005 When the matter is| behalf of the petitioner, 4)I^Id41^ ^l^ldT ^* te^ <1^R:?R ^3Tt^T3T1^T called out, none present on |o representation is made. Shri Sanjay K Aga|rwal, counsel for respondent No.3. Shri Sunil Mersa, co\insel for respondent No.4. Counsel for respon|dent No.4 subinits that the niatter pertains to contracj t for the year 2003. He further submits that since the p|etitioner was not a registered contractor in the State (^f Chhattisgarh, therefore, his tender was not accepted, has already been^e^ecute^ by respondent No.4 and even in the year 200^ the ^etitioner has withdrawn the earnest money which was In view of the above for non-prosecution, |deposited by hini. |fact, this petition is disniissed Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^§[f^r)