IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA, 1930. WP(C).No. 38280 of 2007(F) PETITIONER: DR.SUNITHA KUMARI S., AGED 38, W/O.V.K.UNNI, VATTAMATTATHIL HOUSE, HOUSE NO.7/369-B (AMRA-67) AMBADIMOOLA, KAKKANADU P.O., KOCHI-682 030. BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENTS: 1. THE KALAMASSERRY MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KALAMASSERRY MUNICIPALITY, KALAMASSERRY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SRI.MATHEW KUTTY, ZHAKAPADATH HOUSE, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 38280/2007 -------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED DT. 30-3-2005. EXT.P2 REPORT DT. 15-10-2007. EXT.P2(a) SKETCH OF PUBLIC ROAD. EXT.P3 ORDER DT. 23-10-2007. EXT.P4 COMMUNICATION DT. 31-10-2007. EXT.P5 COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER. EXT.P6 NOTICE DT. 12-9-2007. EXT.P7 REPRESENTATION DT. 1-11-2007. EXT.P8 REPRESENTATION DT. 1-11-2007. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 38280 of 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 29th August, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks implementation of Exts.P 3 and P6 orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer and the Municipality by which the 5th respondent has been directed to remove obstruction to a pathway through which the petitioner sought right of way. The only objection of the 5th respondent is that a civil suit in respect of the same is pending. 2. The 5th respondent has no case that he has obtained any stay of the orders of the authorities. That being so, respondents 1 and 2 are liable to implement Exts.P 3 and P6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to see that Exts.P 3 and P6 are implemented within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/