IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14204 of 2008 1. UDAY NARAIN TIWARI, SON OF SACHIDANAND TIWARI. 2. NIRMALA DEVI, WIFE OF UDAY NARAIN TIWARI, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PUCHHARIA, P.S. SANGRAMPUR, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN, -PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. RAM PYARI DEVI, WIFE OF SHACHIDANAND TIWARI, RESIDENT OF PUCHHARIA, P.S. SANGRAMPUR, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. –OPP.PARTIES 6. 07.11.2008 It is alleged in the complaint that petitioner no.1, who is son of the complainant, took rupees two lacs from the complainant in order to meet the necessary expenses in relation to a case filed against the petitioner no.1 under Sections 304B, 201 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that in the said case the petitioner no.1 was acquitted. It is also alleged that after acquittal petitioner no.1 was requested to return the sum of rupees two lacs. That has not been given, instead the petitioner no.1 took away forcefully two boxes from the house of the complainant containing cash and other articles worth about two lacs rupees. Having regard to the nature of the allegations, I think a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. Let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or 2 surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, in Complaint Case no. C-2079 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Crimional Procedure. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad