IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2009 / 14TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3554 of 2009(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.GIRISH KUMAR, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, 1/1832,PUTHIYA VEETIL, WEST, HILL,KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.3554 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT An application made by the petitioner for replacement of the vehilce and renewal of the permit was rejected by the first respondent as per Ext.P1 proceedings. The petitioner carried the matter in appeal and in Ext.P2 judgment in MVAA.No. 327/07, the tribunal set aside the order and directed the RTA to grant the renewal of permit as sought for by the Petitioner if the request is otherwise in order. The compliant in this writ petition is that although Ext.P2 judgment was rendered as early as on 24.7.2008 and that despite the judgment having become final, the renewed permit has not been granted or issued. Taking into account the grievance highlighted by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to pass orders, consequent to Ext.P2 judgment as expeditiously as possible WP(c).No.3554/09 /2/ and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Needless to say that if there is no meeting within the aforesaid period, it will be open to the first respondent to pass it by circulation. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/