IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 5316 of 2011 (O&M) Dinesh Bajaj .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Joginder Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. In this case, the cancellation report has already been prepared. The same is lying with the D.S.P. If the investigating agency decides to file the cancellation report, the petitioner has a right to contest the same. If the petitioner is having any grievance against not registering the FIR for the real allegations made, he has an alternative remedy of filing a complaint before the Court of Magistrate as has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Versus State of U.P. And others, 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 392. Having regard to the nature of allegation as has been made by the petitioner and revealed during the course of arguments, all offences even if made out, are non-cognizable. It is not a fit case for issuing any direction as prayed for. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. November 30, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE