In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 2890 of 2001 (O&M) Parmal Singh and others ... Appellants vs Union Territory Chandigarh .... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mrs. Ekta Thakur, Advocate, for the appellants. None for Union Territory, Chandigarh. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowners have approached this court for enhancement of compensation of the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that land situated in Village Dadu Majra, U.T., Chandigarh was acquired by the Chandigarh Administration vide notification dated 9.3.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') for construction of houses by Chandigarh Housing Board. The same was followed by notification dated 15.5.1995, issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') vide award No. 500 dated 11.12.1995 determined market value of the land at ` 3,00,000/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections which were referred to the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 5,36,000/- per acre vide award dated 19.2.2001. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal by the landowners. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim of the appellants in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 2989 of 2006 – Union Territory, Chandigarh vs Behal Singh Gill and another, decided on 18.5.2010, whereby the compensation payable to the landowners for the land acquired vide same notification was further enhanced to ` 19,97,581/- per acre. For the detailed reasons recorded in Behl Singh Gill's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 18.11.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge