IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24857 of 2009 RAMESHWAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.8.2009 Heard. Regard being had to the quantity of the seized Ganja from the possession of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to review its earlier order contained in Annexure-1. However, the Court finds from the rejection order that only three witnesses which include the I.O. of the case also are to be examined and in the estimates of the Court a timeframe of six months to be counted from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order could be sufficient for the trial Judge to conclude the trial of N.D.P.S. Case No. 10 of 2007 which is pending before the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran, else, the petitioner could be approaching this Court with the fresh prayer for bail. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)