HieH c RT OF cgH‘AmggaaH A1- V mspua ? 3w; or 2mg /THO' / Abdui Rashid Khan (ammjan), 5/0 Lam Ahdu! Hafiz ikhan, gaged abouf 58 years, RIO Gg—52, ,‘New Panchsheel Nagar, Rg‘xipur, ;Tahsn and Dismcaa kgipur, (ca) V ’ Stafeof Chhafi’isgarh, through § The Chief Secremry, Home, D.K.$. Bhawan Raipur. Districfu‘ Raipur,(C.G.) Director Genera! of Paitice. Chha‘tfisgarh smfe, Police Headquarter, } Raipur, Dim-Ect— Raipur. (6.6.). Additions! Police Direqfat‘. \(Adminisfm'rion) Police HeadquarE‘ter. Roipur, Dislriciu Raipur, ($6.) Superintendent of Police, Slate Economic Crlme Investigmion I Bureau, Chhatfiégarh, Raipur, uisl‘ric‘l- Raipur, (6.6.) v ! i Mohammad I.H.l(han, Superintendent of Police (€5WL L Pumni‘ Busti, Raipur, District Raapé‘r, (6.6.) i I wan ,PErITION UNDER AknciLg 226 OF THE i i mm ‘ ON 0F? INDIA ‘5 ”xAlzhQaLs.) 31. ‘ {2001:} ~ m m {Ww m 371 W mfm‘m um??? wW mm Wm m mi 62Wm 3 311%!!! m SB HSN’BLE $HEI éUSIECE; FRIE’E‘INKER 31W$KER 24.012999 Shri Shri Jitendra Ajay Dwived‘i, GuDta, Dy ccuns (1A ior 1 f0} Lha In gtate'. petmoner. V At the outset, counsel the petitioner wants to Withiraw the present petition with 1ibe for issuance of direction to the respondent No.2 for decidh g the pending represeniation of the petitioner dated 19 . 2i 2009 ilnexure 13/4), He submits that the respondent No.2 be directe to decide the representation of the petitioner at the eartiesti Counsel for the State s no objection if the reeresentation of the petitioner is (iecided by te respondent No.2 in accordance with law. Accordingi , the peti ioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty as afores id. The reseondent No.2 is expected to decide the representation of t} e petitioner dated 19.2.2009 [Annexure P/4) expeditiously preferably l 'ithin a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy oii this order. The petitioner wouid be at liberty to file a fresh representation aiso reminding the respondent No.2 of his pending representation. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on merits and the authority would be at liberty to decide the representation.strictiy in accordance with iaw: ' ‘ « n f Sd/— Pritinker‘ 3iwaker t Judge r¥ ' r ji a