IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 98 of 2009(J) ------------------------------ PETITIONER : ---------------- MOHAMMED.C. PULAKKOTTIL HOUSE, P.O.MONGAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN RESPONDENT : ----------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 98 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Exhibit P1 is the proceedings of the respondent revising timings of the petitioner. In so far as the trip reaching Kozhikode at 7.59 A.M is concerned, the petitioner was aggrieved and therefore he filed M.V.A.R.P. No.112 of 2008 before the Tribunal. The Tribunal disposed of the revision by Exhibit P2 order allowing revision and directing the 2nd respondent to modify the time 7.59 A.M. mentioned in Exhibit P1 as 7.56 A.M. But the modification as ordered by Exhibit P2 has not been carried out and revised proceedings have not been issued by the respondent. Reading of Exhibit P2 shows that the Tribunal has allowed the revision to the extent as mentioned above. Therefore, what is required is that the respondent should carry out the same. In view of this, it is ordered that the respondent shall on the production of the copy of this judgment, issue proceedings revising the timing of the petitioner in terms of Exhibit P1, at any rate within two weeks of its receipt. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm