IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.895 of 2010 1. BRAJ MOHAN PRASAD S/O LATE NANHAK RAM R/O VILL, P.O&P.S- NAWHATTA, DISTT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ESTABLISHMENT), ROHTAS, SASARAM 5. CIRCLE OFFICER, ROHTAS, DISTT- ROHTAS, SASARAM ----------- 3. 26.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. It appears from the pleadings in the writ application that the petitioner has rushed to this court without properly representing before the authorities for grant of time bound promotion. The pleadings in para 11 are considered wholly inadequate. If the petitioner files a representation within a period of 30 days from today let the same be considered and disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)