[1] SBCW PETITION NO.16243/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.16243/2010 BRAJMOHAN Vs. CIVIL JUDGE(JD), JHUNJHUNU & ANR. DATE :: 13.12.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. S.S. Sunda, for the petitioner. **** Heard learned counsel for petitioner. The plaintiff/petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 26.04.2010 (Annexure-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jhunjhunu, whereby his application to summon original 'Bahi' from the then Thikana Malsisar has been dismissed. Learned counsel for petitioner, at the outset, submitted that the learned trial Court has rejected his application on the ground that it was the duty of the plaintiff to obtain certified copy of the document and the same should have been produced along with an application with a prayer to summon the original record, but he did not obtain [2] SBCW PETITION NO.16243/2010 certified copy of the document and the same has not been filed along with the application. In these circumstances, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to move fresh application along with certified copy of the document with necessary prayer to summon the original record. Prayer is allowed. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/ [3] SBCW PETITION NO.16243/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL MISC. STAY APPLICATION NO.8659/2010 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.16243/2010 BRAJMOHAN Vs. CIVIL JUDGE(JD), JHUNJHUNU & ANR. DATE :: 13.12.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. S.S. Sunda, for the petitioner. **** Since the writ petition itself has been dismissed, therefore, this stay application does not survive and the same also stands dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/