HIGH COTIRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR PETITIONER WntPetittoii,(SlNo..2.u62of2007 Smt. Jermina W/o Ram Kumar EUa Aged about 26 years, Caste Uraon, R/o Village Soor P.S. & Tah. Sitapur Distt. Surguja (CG). VERSUS RES^NDENT^ : 1. State of Cl-Aattisgarh Throudi: The Secretary DepartmeHt of Womesi Atid Child Development.DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Coiiimissioner, Women and Child Development, Raipur (CG). 3. The Collector, Surgiija Distt. Surgiya (CG). 4. Tlie District Programme QfBeer, Women and Child Development, Surgiija (CG). 5. Tiie Pi-qject Ofncer, Women and CIiild Development Sitapur, Distt. Surgiya (CG). 6. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, Distt. Surgiija (CG). 7. Smt Jagrita W/o Girdhari aged about 27 years Caste- Teli, R/b vilhge Soor P.S. & Tah. Sitapur Distt. Surgiya (CG). (WK!I PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sstish K. Aeiiihotn. J.) Preseat : Sliri Rahu! Mislira, Advocate for the petitioner. Sbri S.K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer forthe State. Saha (Passed on 22nd ofJaimary, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petttioner submits that reinedy of statutory appeal is availabie to the petitioner and the petitioner waiits to avai! flie said remedy. 2. In view of the availabiUty of remedy of statirtory appea!, there is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances' warraitmg interference under Article 226 ofthe Constitirtion oflndia. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, a iiberty is reserved to the petitioaer to take recourse to remedy of statirtory appeal, avai'able to hiiii, underthe provisions oflaw. 4. Delay, on account ofpeiidency ofthis matter, should not be a reason for rejecting the appeal on the ground ofdelay. _——- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge