4. ^- ; snTf^ '^ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. M'-S^I /2010. PETITIONER: ^" Srat.Munni Bai, wife of Bharat Rain, aged about 50 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Rajouti, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents ^ V .^^ ^s^ ^'.••"^K^"" .^^^^ . v* ....•<^^' ^y 7- ^"^ / ' T%>" i 1.r State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3C Asst.Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Block Education Officer, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4551 OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Munni Bai Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others rc\^3 (Writ Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. J [ "'l^N Arun Present:- Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 25th day of January, 2011) 1. hleard learned counsel forthe parties. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been appointed as Assistant Teacher on 17/02/87 (Annexure P/2) and before joining of her service, the petitioner has obtained her B.T.I. certificate in the year 1982 from Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal (Annexure P/3). It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra as the same has been finally settled by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State ofM.P. & Ors. . 3. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar view in its order dated 6-2-2009 passed in W.P. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in W.A.NC 124 of 2009 wherein relying upon the judgmeAt of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another W.A.No.87 of 2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe facts pleaded in the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. 5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1,974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of 8 weeks from today. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge 1 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59