IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19043 of 2003 Between: 1 K.Sri Hari Rao, S/o. K.Raghunath Rao, R/o. Sirpur Kagaznagar, Adilabad District. 2 P.Hanmanth Rao, S/o. P.Muthyam Rao, Q.No.B-25, SPM Colony, Sirpur Kagaznagar, Adilabad District. 3 K.V.Kishan Rao, S/o. K.Madhav Rao, Village: Mandamarri, Adilabad District. 4 K.Ram Mohan Rao, S/o. K.V.Kishan Rao, Village Mandamarri, Adilabad District. 5 K.Jagan Mohan Rao, S/o.K.V.Kishan Rao, Village Mandamarri, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad. 2 The Senior Branch Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, Adilabad Branch, Collectorate Road, Adilabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or directive more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in issuing the notices under A.P. Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 and taking the coercive steps for recovery of the amounts under the Act as wholly arbitrary, highly illegal, unjust, impracticable and unconstitutional. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B.RAMMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI DURGA REDDY THIMMAYYAGARI The Court made the following: ORDER: As there was no representation, when the writ petition was called for hearing on 23-06-2009, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal.” Today also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J June 24, 2009. KTL/ASP