^A^^ INTHEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (d} N0. )2^1 OF 2007 PETITIONER ^ t '^./•' -A^-' a l?-r\' 0\\< < ^y.^ ^•^'^ ^?" .^' [,yy 9'y Smt. Lalita Devi, aged about 30 years, W/o Shri Gangaram Mandavi, Anganbadi Worker, Ekikrit Mahila Bal Vikas Seva Pariyojana Canth - Gram Sakha, Distt. Rajnandgaon. (Chhattisgarh) « VE RS U S RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector (Mahila) District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) Distt. Mahila and Balvikas Adhikari, Distt. Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) 3. Project Officer, Mahila and Balvikas Seva Pariyojana, Tehsil Block - Chuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOrL OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF hflANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUJTABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: f"~c?'r f-M. JRT OF CHHA'mS(iAKH AT BILASPUR T PE TITION No. 1351 of2007. Petitioner Smt. Lalita Devi Versus State ofChhatti.sgarfc & Others. Present Smt. Smita Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner. Deepali Pandey, Panei Lawyer for the ts 1 to 3. (Passed on 9sl ofMarch, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for petrtioner, on direction, submits that the petitioner does not wants to press any other ground at this stage except that the petitioner be permitted to make a representation before the competent autfaorit^' and the competent autliorit}7 be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, withia a stipulated period of time. It is ordered accordingly. 2. However, if a represeatetion is made by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the competent authority within a period ofsix weeks from the date of receipt of rspresestation, in accordance with law as oer Angan Badi scheme. Amit This writ costs. dismissed as withdrawn. No order as is d'sm Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge