IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 20TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4125 of 2010(O) AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA 8192/09 IN OS.386/2005 of I ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM PETITIONER(S): 1. P.R.AJITH, S/O.PUSUTHOTHAMAN, T.C.14/2054, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. P.R.ANITHA, D/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, DO. DO. 3. SURENDRAN, H/O.P.R.ANITHA, DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ANANDAKUTTAN SMT.M.A.ZOHRA SRI.R.S.MADHU SRI.MAHESH ANANDAKUTTAN RESPONDENT(S): 1. P.M.ABDUL AZIZ, S/O.LATE PEERU MOHAMMED, A1.SHIFA MANZIL, VILAPPILSALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. P.ABDUL MUNAF, S/O.LATE PEERU MOHAMMED, JASEELA MANZIL, XP/VII/521, THOPPUMUKKU, VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. AYISHA BEEVI P., D/O.LATE PEERU MOHAMMED AVRA-B-27/1 ARAYALLOOR, TIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, S/O.LATE PEERU MOHAMMED, TC14/2092, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. NABEESABEEVI, D/O.LATE PEERU MOHAMMED, DO. DO. 6. BADARUDIN BABU, S/O.LATE PEERU MOHAMMED, DO. DO. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(c).No.4125 of 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 9 th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT The writ petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No.386 of 2005 on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. Eventhough the petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P3 order, as per which the applicants in I.A.No.8192 of 2009 were ordered to be impleaded as additional plaintiffs in the suit, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that since the court below has added a rider to the order of impleadment that the applicants cannot raise any claim in conflict to the claim or interest of the plaintiffs in the suit, the petitioners would be satisfied if the court below is directed to dispose of the suit itself expeditiously. This writ petition is disposed of directing the I Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram to dispose of O.S.No.386 of 2005 expeditiously and at any rate within a W.P.(c)No.4125/2010 2 period of six months of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In case that court is not able to adhere to the time limit it shall send a report to the Registrar of this Court explaining the reason as to why the court has not complied with the time limit fixed by this Court. Dated this the 9th day of February, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj