IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42053 of 2009 JAMINDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the state. Admittedly, petitioner is husband of the victim and there is allegation that he alongwith other accused assaulted her with LATHI. Furthermore, it is apparent from the F.I.R. that the marriage of petitioner had taken place with the informant 20 years ago and this court tried to patch up the dispute of the parties issuing notice but the informant did not turn up before this court in spite of service of notice. Moreover, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I do not think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the concerned court and seek regular bail within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif. Furthermore, learned court below is directed to explore the possibility of reconciliation at the time of hearing regular bail application of the petitioner and if reconciliation takes place between the parties, then in that event, the 2 learned court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to his satisfaction. AKV/PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)