HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR S.B. : HON'BLEMR.SATISHK.AGNIHOTRI.J. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1678 PETITIONER ^- RESPONDENTS Smt. Mridula Tripathi, W/o Shri D.K.Tripathi, Aged about 44 years, Wo Devnandan Nagar Bilaspur. (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through:- Secretary, Education Department, ).K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of School Education ).K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education officer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Mr. Kumaresh Tiwan, Advoeate for the petitioner. Miss. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER i^nd (Passed on 221U ofMarch, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mmricipal Corporation, Aniit Durg and another (2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for ths respondents does not controvert tfae said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra); subject to verification of the fact as to whetfaer the petitioner has acquired M.Ed. Exsmination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and l.1999 and farther whether she has been paid two advance incremeats or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge