Crl. Misc. No. M-17508 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-17508 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.7.2010 Heena and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Balkar singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5. He submits that both respondents No.4 and 5 are present in court and they have reconciled the factum of marriage of the petitioners. Learned counsel assures the court that respondents No.4 and 5 shall not harass the petitioners in any manner. Learned State counsel submits that in view of statement made by counsel for respondents No.4 and 5, the prayer made in this petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under these circumstances, he may be allowed to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 9.7.2010 'rajpal'