CRM No. M 27379 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 27379 of 2009 Date of decision: 18.04.2011 Dr. Gurpreet Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sahni, Advocate for Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. J S Brar, AAG, Punjab for the respondent State None for respondent No. 7 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents not to harass the petitioner or call him to the police Station, Phase XI Mohali or PS Fatehgarh Sahib without following the provisions of Section 160 Cr.P.C with further prayer that the police belonging to Police District Mohali and Fatehgarh Sahib be directed not to compel the petitioner to hand over his son to Smt. Narinder Kaur wife of the petitioner or to interfere in the lives of family of the petitioner without due CRM No. M 27379 of 2009 2 process of law. None has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 7 in spite of service. Reply has been filed by the State. As per the reply filed by the DSP, Fatehgarh Sahib, no FIR is registered against the present petitioner at Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib and nor is he wanted by the Police Station at Fatehgarh Sahib. As per reply filed by the DSP, City II, District SAS Nagar Mohali, DDR No. 16 dated 28.04.2009 has been got registered against the petitioner at Police Station Phase XI, Mohali by respondent No. 7 who is wife of the petitioner. There was a dispute between the petitioner and respondent No. 7 over the custody of the child. The child with his own will and with the consent of both the parties went to respo0ndent No. 7. Both the parties agreed with the said decision and put their signatures on the DDR. Respectables also put their signatures on the same. It is also stated that now no other complaint or case is pending against the petitioner at Police Station Mohali. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 18.04.2011 mohan