IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41594 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 15.3.2011 Heard Ms. Madhuri Lata learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C. Jawhar counsel for the State. This case was registered under Section 25(1-b) a/26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, recovery was of a country made gun and five cartridge. The contention is that prior to the alleged occurrence the informant of Bikram P.S. Case No. 130 of 2010 had lodged a report and the investigation was entrusted to one A.S.I Dharmendra Kumar, but without assigning any reason it is not known as to how and why the officer in-charge of the said police station himself went to investigate that particular case. The contention is that the officer in-charge is in-connivance with the informant of earlier Vikram P.S. Case No. 130 of 2010 and he by transplanting the alleged recovery of arm and ammunition has falsely implicated the present petitioner which is further highlighted by the fact 2 that no other person that the brother of informant of Bikram P.S. Case No. 131 of 2010 was being associated with the search and seizure of the arms. It is contended that it is a case of false implication. Regard being had to the facts and circumstance of this case, let the petitioner namely, Manoj Kumar Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 131 of 2010. Prakash (Dharnidhar Jha,J.)