IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18480 of 2009 MAHESH CHOUDHARY Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is a case of embezzlement in which payment is made showing completion of the work, while only part work was done and liabilities fixed regarding embezzlement of the excess amount but submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that work was to be done by Executive Agent and verified (measurement was to be done) by Junior Engineer then only bill is passed. That is the work of this petitioner but no liability can be fixed upon him for refusal of his anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Birpur, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)