IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE NINTH(9TH) DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Crl.P.No.5820 of 2010 & Crl.P.No.6019 of 2010 Crl.P.No.5820 of 2010: Between: Pitla Pandu & another … Petitioners-A.2 & A.3 And: Kanchana Thyagaraj & 2 others … Respondents Crl.P.No.6019 of 2010: Between: L.R. Srinivas … Petitioner And: The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & 2 others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Crl.P.No.5820 of 2010 & Crl.P.No.6019 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners and respondents in both the matters present. Sri L.N. Bhadriraju (learned counsel for the petitioners in Crl.P.No.5820 of 2010 and Sri K. Satyanarayana Murthy, (learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.6019 of 2010) and Sri Eranki Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents in both the petitions, are also present. 2. It is stated by both the parties that they have resolved the dispute amicably outside the Court and entered into compromise and that in terms of compromise, civil suit OS No.352 of 2010 on the file of the I Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Secunderabad was also disposed of. The respondents-de-facto complainants states that in view of the compromise entered into, they are no longer interested in prosecuting the case any further against the petitioners in both the matters. 3. Having regard to the fact that the disputes have been settled out side the Court and both parties have entered into compromise and the respondents are no more interested in prosecuting criminal proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.233 of 2010 of Gandhi Nagar PS, Hyderabad, it is considered that no useful purpose would be served by continuing further proceedings against the petitioners in Cr.No.233 of 2010 of Gandhinagar PS, Hyderabad. It is therefore considered a fit case to invoke inherent powers of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash further proceedings in Cr.No.233 of 2010 of PS Gandhinagar, against the petitioners in both the petitions. 4. In the circumstances, further proceedings in Cr.No.233 of 2010 of Gandhinagar PS, against the petitioners in both the petitions, are held liable to be quashed and are accordingly quashed. 5. In the result, both the criminal petitions are disposed of as stated above. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 09.12.2010 bss