S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5858/08 Rajrani & ors. vs. Managing Director, Tata Teleservice Ltd. and ors. Date of Order:- 2.2.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA Mr. BS Sandhu for the petitioner. Mr. VK Mathur for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Before framing of the issues, application has been submitted by the plaintiff for incorporating certain facts in support of his already taken plea. The trial court was also of the view that the plaintiff- petitioner can argue on the points which he has taken in the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, at the time of arguments. In that situation, there was hardly any reason for trial court for denying the amendment in the plaint so as to enable the defendant to file reply to the plea taken by the plaintiff by way of pleading. The order of the trial court, therefore, deserves to be set aside. Therefore, the writ petition of the petitioner is allowed and order of the trial court dated 16.7.2008 is set aside and the application of the plaintiff, which will provide the facts more specific, is allowed. (PRAKASH TATIA)J mlt.