IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 17523 of 2009 Between: M.Mohan Reddy and another. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Commissioner of police, Hyderabad and two others. .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 17523 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners approached this Court and filed the present writ petition questioning the action of the official respondents in interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property bearing plot No.47 in Sy. No.129/1, admeasuring 417 square yards, situated at Venkatgiri Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for Home, appearing for R-1 and R-2 and Sri M.Karuna Sagar, learned counsel for R-3. 3. On written instructions, the learned Government Pleader for Home submitted that the respondent-officials are not interfering with the petitioners’ peaceful possession and on the basis of a complaint given by the 3rd respondent, a case in Crime No.8 of 2000, for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 and read with Section 34 IPC, has been registered and after investigation, a charge sheet was filed and the same was numbered as C.C.No.3 of 2003 and the accused therein were acquitted by the trial Court on 19-02-2008. But, however, the property involved in the said crime and the property, which the petitioners claimed, are different and it is clearly clarified that the respondent-officials are not at all interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners’ property. 4. In the light of the said written instructions, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ November 18, 2009 Note: Issue C.C. in three days. B/o. Kvr