IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6451 of 2011 RANJAY SHARMA @ RANJAY KUMAR SHARMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4. 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional public prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report and it is stated that he alongwith two other accused persons were seen fleeing from the place of occurrence. Although, except the aforesaid material, there is nothing against the petitioner but, admittedly, the alleged occurrence took place in the year 2002 and petitioner surrendered before the court below on 30.07.2010 and para 28 of the case diary reveals that the properties of the petitioner was attached in execution of process issued under section 83 of Cr.P.C. on 05.06.2007. The aforesaid fact clearly reflects that petitioner evaded his arrest near about 10 years . Although, one co-accused having similar allegation has been granted privilege of bail by this court but the said accused was released on bail on 08.07.2002 i.e. just after the institution of the present case. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case I do not think it proper to release the petitioner on bail in connection with Belaganj P.S.Case No. 147/2000. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. He is informed that the case of the petitioner is still pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya for commitment. If that being the position, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya should commit the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions within 15 days from the date of this order in accordance with law and if after commitment of the case of the petitioner, the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six months from the date of commitment order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Nitesh ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)