^' ^L< BSFOR3 THE HON' BL.E HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIU.SPUR. W. P .No. •^'Z-B7^?005. itionsr Respondents •'v'i ow ^.^ :> : Ajit Kumar Ngir aged 36 years, son of P.G.K. Nair ^ V-5> Vardhnan Nagar? RAJl\fANDGAON. Versus. STATE £;cvr cp £.4 Ihk.ciiie,^ (1) The Chief Sscretary Govt. o£ Chbattisgarn* Raipur. (>2) Cbief Engineer, P.W.D. (B & R) Raipur. ^ . ..<^ /•<§?•' k^'y ^'.^•'' .^ (5) (4) The Collect.or, Rajnandgaon. ^?%^--" *?L>'' -^yrly' 'y^y »yy Sxecutive .@3glnser» P.W.D. B & R Divlsion, Rajnandgaon. ^ 'w'ri.t Petitlon under Ar-fciole22'6/227 of the Constitution oS. India.: •!..-t/____ *- XI-HC-22 •4. 's^ -<11*<M<<, a'alu'is, 1»«lii'Mi< I'p.^s-g? II*<CTI ginirai •^ 2003 fa'b<»' 311^1 ^iT h-u°h sv^v stiHich •yfen ^i^i '?^n^ yiiti Shrivastava, counse Shri Rcanbir Singh Marhas, The petitioner has preferr^ 226/227 of the Constitution consideration of his case for compas^ The petitioner's case is that ^ who died at the age of 57 years and the bread. Therefore, the petiti) appointment, but the respondents petitioner in a foir- manner. Even ©oyt. Advocate for the State/ this writ petition under Articie ]pf India, seeking petitioner before the State Adni! Beneh vide order dated 29.05.2000 appiiccrit (petitioner herein) regan ground be decid'ed by the non-applic month from the date of receipt o- order, the respondents are not pass representation on 02.06.2000 (Anni his motiier, but nothing has been mother of 1+ie petitioner on 19.08. Ashwani Kumar Sharma on comi +l^i<Ti4lH ^w<'ft*'^ fs^ <^!i^i< '^atpOTsri^ii |e is the son of Late Smt. C.K. Nair, there is nobody in the famiiy to earn ;ner is entitled for compassionate ar^e not considerin9 the request cf the fose No.435/2000 was filed by the i[iistrative Tribunal and the Raipur ordered that the application of the •^iing appointment on compassionate li4ints within a period of one and half order. But in spite cf that ng any order. The petitioner fited a !.xure P-3) and death certificate of .p8, the respondent ha'/e appointed ((assionate grounds, whereas, the (^y ^n-HC_78 HWyH eR^W -S^ ^yq^Tq^ »Tiiy<i6,MPTray ..tA3..'..^...^.^l2/ ^ . A 3TT-??? 'q°!^r ('~i?r:i^';T,i ^EC^I qTf T*^?^' | "I-'"' •^ii^^S Sl^E») ; i^gitR'gfs? sn^i -2i ^rtlrl'm 'q'tm? ~S. TSfi Tra^R 3;' SfRrq &TTt?l' ietitioner's application was already p6ndin9 on l+ie date. Astliemollier 1 of the petitioner was already known tp the respondents, the respondents i - B -ap ^ave malafidety and arbitrarily n6t considered the case of the setitioner. The Executive Engineer, PW&, Rajnandgaon, wrote a tstter |ated 16.10.98 to the Superntendent Engineer, PWD ond ^uperintendent Enginesr, burg Circle |wrote a ietter on 02.12.98. I have heard the learned couns^i for the pcrties. j Leorned counset for the petitjoner submits that the respondent ^uthorities are behaving in an arUitrary manner sind thsy are nst fconsidering the case of the petltiorjer. He further submlts that the ! ^etitioner may be allowed to make a detaiied representation ancl the 1'espondents be directed to dec|de the represantation within a 1 l^asonable time to which the learned ^ovt. Advocate has no objection. i . 1 t-iaiving heard the learned co^insei for the par'ties iind having i-egard to the facts and circumstai-|ces of the case, the petitioner is tllowed to make a detailed represenf'ation reytrdmg his appointment on pompassionate grounds within a p^riod of ten days from today to sspondent No.2 and in turn, reqpondent No.2 shall consider Ths fepresentation and pass approp^iate and reasoned order and fcommunicate the same to the peti-^oner within nvo jn^nths from the fiate of receipt of the representatipn.'7 71ie petFi'ione?' is ma+ured for pompassionate appointmen-t- and theqe is vcconcy, then why respondent N 1 fB- ^Vj :—7S ^^ '^SPVvPf, •aviww, 'feTRiy .^.^.^.^.SZ 3 (Tpt^^q) ^msiRWWtiw 3 W-iif -fW' ^'sfiwTsniw ^•^^S^W Soxna. No.2 ia not considering his cos4, the reasons are best respondent No.2. In the given pdf'wd if nothing is done by respondertt 1 • I • No.2, then the petitioner is at liber^y to move 1+iis Court agnin. 1 ...^. .' . . i' ^ With the above observatior|s ond dir-ecticns the petition stonds In view of this or^er, M.(W.)P.No.2090/2003, LA. Nos.7043/2003 and 8261/2003 alsi( stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certi-fjied copy of this order. ____.-- Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge c^s«ts Ei:ri'!:i""f::'--;:"--":-