1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15623 of 2011 Muthulakshmi :Petitioner -Vs- The State by, The Inspector of Police, Vigilance & Anti Corruption, Trichy Detachment, Trichy District. :Respondent PRAYER:This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent police, to file a final report in Crime No. 07 of 2010. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondent: Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent police, to file a final report in Crime No. 07 of 2010. 2.Heard Mr.S.Ramasamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner was working as a Special Thasildar for Land Acquisition at Trichy. He would further submit in his argument that for acquisition of land, the petitioner went to Special Thasildar Office, Trichy and received a sum of Rs.5,46,693/- as compensation from the petitioner herein and the petitioner asked him to come after 10 or 15 days for receiving proceedings in order to file appeal before the District Collector, Trichy for enhancing compensation and accordingly, he approached and thereafter, demanded a sum of Rs.1000/- as illegal gratification for issuing the proceedings and on the day of alleged demand made by the petitioner, she was transferred to some other station and she did not receive any amount from the complainant and therefore, she has been falsely implicated in this case due to personal enmity in between her and the complainant and however, she was arrested and was remanded to judicial custody. He would further submit in his argument that a case has been registered on 10.03.2010 and she was placed under suspension by the District Collector, Trichirappalli, on 13.03.2010 on the ground that she was in judicial custody for exceeding the period of 48 hours. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.He would also submit in his argument that the petitioner has filed Writ Petitions before this Court in W.P.(MD).Nos. 6236/2010 & 5592 of 2010 and in both occasions, this Court has directed the District Collector, Tirchirappalli, to consider the representation of the petitioner for revocation of suspension order, but the District Collector, has rejected her claim by stating that the criminal case is still pending. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the respondent police to complete the investigation and to file a final report in Crime No. 07 of 2010 on the file of the respondent. 5.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No. 07 of 2010 and the investigation has almost been completed and the final report will be filed within a period of two months before the appropriate Court. 6.Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and to direct the respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 07 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7.With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) / TRUE COPY / Assistant Registrar To: 1. The Inspector of Police Vigilance & Anti Corruption Trichy Detachment Trichy District 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court Madurai vsg RP/02.01.2012/2P/3C. Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15623 of 2011 30.11.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/