IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2074 of 2011 MAHESH BIN @ KHOKHA, SON OF KHEDAN BIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner was refused bail on account of the fact that he has remained absconding but was granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge but in fact, charges have been framed even before the order was passed by this Court on 25.11.2010. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha, West Champaran, in Sessions Trial No. 180 of 2004 arising out of Naurangia P.S. Case No. 14 of 1997 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the elder brother of the petitioner namely Ramdev Bin. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the 2 bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)