Criminal Misc. -M No. 28974 of 2011 (1) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. -M No. 28974 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.11.2011 Narinder Saini and another .. Petitioners versus State of Haryana .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Y. S. Turka, Advocate, for petitioner no. 2. Mr. Anmol Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. Vide order dated 23.9.2011, bail petition on behalf of petitioner no. 1- Narinder Saini was dismissed as infructuous as he was arrested. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to petitioner No. 2 Prince, in FIR No. 12 dated 22.1.2011, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 506, 307 IPC at Police Station Barara, District Ambala. While granting interim stay of arrest on 28.9.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for petitioner no.2 were noticed:- “Learned counsel for petitioner No. 2 submitted that he is a juvenile and is a student of 10+2 class. His examinations are to commence from September 30, 2011. As per the FIR, injuries on the basis of which, offence under Section 307 was added are attributed to Vikas @ Vicky. Sumit has been arrested. Pre-arrest bail application bearing Criminal Misc. -M No. 20301 of 2011 filed by Vikas @ Vicky was dismissed by this court on 14.07.2011. All other injuries were found to be simple.” Learned counsel for petitioner no. 2 submitted that petitioner no. 2 has only been attributed fist blows to the injured. He has joined investigation. Criminal Misc. -M No. 28974 of 2011 (2) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions ASI Sunder Lal, did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, petitioner no. 2 is not required to be taken into custody. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to petitioner no. 2 on 28.9.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 30.11.2011 Judge vs