IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1995 of 2009 United India Insurance Company Limited, Jaipur VERSUS Madan Lal Meena son of Shri Gopal Lal Meena & another \ Date of Order :::: March 5th, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, on behalf of Mr. Ashok Mehta, Counsel for the appellant-company *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the appellant-company and perused the impugned order. The question, which has been raised is that the deceased was not employed as workman. The aforesaid question is a question of fact and an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is maintainable only on substantial question of law. In view of the above, the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the appellant-company is not tenable. Learned counsel for the appellant-company has next contended that the learned Commissioner has erred in allowing the interest on the compensation amount with effect from one month after the date of accident. So far as the above contention is concerned, the learned counsel for the appellant-company has relied upon the Larger Bench's decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pratap Narayan Singh Dev Vs. Sriniwas, reported in A.I.R. 1976 S.C. 222. In the facts and circumstances, no substantial question of law arises in this miscellaneous appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The miscellaneous appeal and the stay application are accordingly dismissed summarily. (Dalip Singh), J. ashok/