1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 279 OF 2009 Goverdhan S. Hemnani ...Applicant. . Vs. Daulat Lakhi Cancer & Ors.. ...Respondents. ---- Mr. G.A. Tambe, for the Petitioner. Ms. Nirmala Gopal, for the Respondent No.4 ---- CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 5 th FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.: 1. In the present Civil Application, the applicant prayed that applicant be allowed to serve respondent nos.1 to 3 by way of substituted service. 2. For the reasons stated in the paragraph-2 of the Civil Application, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under: “Applicant be allowed to serve the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 by way of substituted service, viz.(i) by affixing the Duplicate Copy of Summons and true copy of the Petition on the Notice Board of the Hon’ble meant for the purpose and (ii) by publishing an extract of the Writ Summons in 2 the “Free Press Journal”, English News paper and in Marathi Newspaper “Sakal” circulated in Pune. The Applicant further prays that Respondent No.3 be allowed to be served through the Office of the Commissioner of Mumbai, Crawford Market, Mumbai” 3. The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K. TATED,J.)