IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 5457 of 2009(B) ---------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. DR.C.G. SREEVIDYA, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGADATANTRA, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DR.M.N. JAYASREE, LECTURER (TUTOR), DEPARTMENT OF AGADATANTRA, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DR. SHIJI.R.S, LECTURER (TUTOR), DEPARTMENT OF AGADATANTRA, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DR. SEEMAJA.G, LECTURER (TUTOR), DEPARTMENT OF AGADATANTRA, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THRIPUNITHURA. BY ADVS. SRI.V.K.SATHYANATHAN SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, AYURVEDA MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, INDIAN SYSTEMS OF MEDICINE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ...2/- WP(C).No. 5457 of 2009(B) -2- 4. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT AYURVEDA COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. DR. SANDHYA R., KALADIVAIDYA MADOM, T.C. NO. 26/2084, CPRA 139, CHIRAKKULAM ROAD, G.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1, R2 & R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...3/- WP(C).No. 5457 of 2009(B) -2- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : PROCEEDINGS OF THE D.A.M.E. DTD 18.1.2003. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE KERALA GAZETTE NO. 1462 DATED 4.8.2007 SPECIAL RULES FOR KERALA STATE AYURVEDA MEDICAL EDUCATION. EXT.P3 : G.O.(RT) 365/09/H&FWD DTD 7.2.2009. EXT.P4 : G.O.(RT) 366/09/H&FWD DTD 7.2.2009. EXT.P5 : REPRESENTATION TO THE HEALTH MINISTER DATED 13.2.2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 5457 Of 2009-B -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn