BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.11074 of 2011 1 M.MANIKANDAN 2 MARIMUTHU 3 M.ILANJIYAM 4 A.LATHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION GOLDENT ROCK, TRICHY, CR.NO.27/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SANKAR GANESH Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498(A) and 306 I.P.C., in Crime No.27 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that he is not pressing this petition for anticipatory bail in respect of the first petitioner and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. He further submitted that the petitioners 2 to 4 are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners 2 to 4. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners 2 to 4 demanded dowry along with first accused and due to which, the deceased has committed suicide by strangulation in the first petitioner's house on 09.06.2011 for which initially a case was registered under Section 174 of Cr.P.C., but now it has been altered into 498(A) and 306 IPC and the investigation is considerably over and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as not pressed in respect of the first petitioner and also considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 to 4 with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 4 are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.VI, Trichy, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 2 to 4 shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners 2 to 4 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners 2 to 4 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 24/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, TIRUCHY 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHY 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION GOLDENT ROCK, TRICHY 1. CC to M/S. N.SANKAR GANESH Advocate SR.No. DM::2011:AUGUST:26:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11074 of 2011 Date :24/08/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/