IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 31st day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 384 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Rakshpal .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No. 382/2009, U/s 392, 411 IPC, PS Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. _______________________________________________________________ March 31, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Atul Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and he was arrested on 21.12.2009. Thereafter he was taken in police remand and on 7.1.2010, Rs. 6500/- has been shown to be recovered from the house of the applicant on his pointing out. He further submitted that the said money shown to be recovered belongs to the mother of the applicant and the same is not out of the looted amount. He also submitted that the applicant has got no previous criminal history, who is in jail since 21.12.2009. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Rakshpal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 31.3.2010 PRABODH 2