1 WP6804/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6804 OF 2010 Kalpana H. Patil ...Petitioner v/s State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr R.K. Mendadkar for Petitioner. Mr C.R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND N.D. DESHPANDE JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2010. 2 WP6804/10 P.C. :- 1] By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order of the Scrutiny Committee holding that the claim of the petitioner that she belongs to Mahadeo Koli, Scheduled Tribe is not valid. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perusal of the record shows that many of the close relatives of the petitioner are Koli by caste as per the record. The Scrutiny Committee has given a list of such close relatives in the order. The caste of the real uncle of the petitioner is recorded as Koli. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that nine of her relatives have been given validity certificates because of High Court s order and also by the Scrutiny Committee. He wanted us to adjourn the matter so that he could submit copies of the Vigilance Cell reports in those cases. In our opinion, it will not be appropriate to adjourn the matter when there is so much material placed on record in this case. The order of the Scrutiny Committee goes to show that the caste of the 3 WP6804/10 petitioner is Koli and not Mahadeo Koli, we find that there is no room to interfere with the order impugned. Petition is therefore rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. (JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH) (JUSTICE N.D. DESHPANDE)