1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 724/2008 Smt. Kusum Chandrakant Raut vs. State of Maharashtra &another. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. CORAM : R.Y.Ganoo,J DATE : 25.08.2009 Rule was issued on 26.2.2008. 2. I have heard Mr. D.V.Chauhan with Mr. P.G.Thombre, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Kale, learned A.P.P. for the State. None for respondent no.2. 3. As the matter was called out, learned Advocate for the petitioner applied for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file discharge application if at all charge sheet is filed against the petitioner. 4. The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that order dated 26.2.2008 was passed on the following terms. “Interim protection to the applicant from arrest for the offence punishable under Section 406 read with Section 34 of the 2` Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 31/08 P.S. Frezarpura, Amravati.” 5. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that this order be continued for some time to enable the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings to protect her liberty. The request for withdrawal of the petition can be granted. The request for continuation of protection granted vide order dated 26.2.2008 for the limited period can be granted. Hence, the following order is passed; i) The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file discharge application if at all charge sheet is filed against the petitioner. ii) No views are expressed on merits of the matter. Iii) Protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 26.2.2008 to continue in favour of the petitioner till 19.9.2009. iv) Petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate proceedings to protect her liberty. Petition stands disposed in the above terms. JUDGE patle 3`