I /, 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV, 1ss/2009 & CM No.lQ o lQ t2009 (to be numbered) CHUNNI LAL ,.... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Adv. versus MAKAT RAM ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER o/o 22.12.2009 After addressing arguments at some length, counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving .the right of the petitioner to approach the Additional Rent Controller by filing an application under Order 37 Rule 4 CPC for setting aside the impugned order of eviction, in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench passed in the case of Mohd. Quresh vs. Roopa Fatedar, reported as.ILR 1990 Delhi 16, followed by this Court in the case of Prithi Pa.l Singh vs. Satpal Singh, reported as 20O6 (133) DLT 686. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application. HIMA KOHLI,J DECEMBER 22,2009 sk Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified