1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 6056/2007 (Sangita D/o Ramdasji Bahirseth vs. Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. CORAM: D.D. SINH A & Smt. V.A.NAIK , JJ. DATED: 22 nd January, 2008. *** Heard Mr. S.R. Narnaware, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. N W Sambre, for Respondent no.1. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner has pressed only prayer clause (i) in the present Petition and prayed that the issues which are raised in the petition and pertaining to Prayer Clauses (ii) & (iii) may be kept open. Shri N.W.Sambre, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 Scrutiny Committee, makes a statement that the caste claim of the petitioner is referred to the Respondent No.1 - Committee on 9.10.2007 by the petitioner, and as per the provisions of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Nomadic Tribes ( VJs), Nomadic Tribes, Special backward Classes and Special Backward Category ( Regulation of Issuance and Verification of ) 2 Caste Certificate Act, 2000, the Committee is expected to decide the same within a period of six months, if not already decided. 3. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for Scrutiny Committee, the cause of action pertaining to prayer clause (i) does not survive. Keeping the other issues open, Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE sahare