Im‘ 1%E %IGE% CG5R'!’ OF EUBICATURE aT BIIASPUR, CHHATTISGARH MISC. APPEAL N§. x . 20a / PPELLANT f4g/e Natignai Insurance Co. Ltd. " INSURER _ Through its Branch Manager, Branch at B/l, Taha Compbx, Priyadarshini Nagar, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) - ISC. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MGTOR VEHICLE ACT , / V E R S U S ‘ §PONDENTS 1'. Smt. Jaswant Singh Bhagra, CLAIMANTS //UW/o Manindrapal Singh, aged about 38 ‘. Prem Deep Singh Bhagra, (L ‘ .. we! K4) ,éjl S/a Manindrapa! singh, aged about 21 years .54“) w- ....‘ ' gag} Both R/o Mahamaya Road, Ambikapur, Tehsi} : Sarguja, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) R€SPoNDENts “ . Raniit Singh Tuteja, S/o Shri J.sfTuteja, aged about 7o afs / y 4. Ravindra Singh Tuteja, S/o Shri Sardar Ranjit Singh Tuteja, aged about 4O years Eoth R/o Tej Medical Stores, Near Bus Stand, Babupara, Ambikapur, Tehswa'oistrict Sarguja (CMsgarh) ¢ MMN ....r._._ XI‘HC—22 31.3.2003 Shri Saniay K. Agrawal with 5111i Prateek Sinha, counsel for the appellant. Hcald. The appellamt has filed [ 10.10.2002 passed‘by the Illrd Tribunal, Ambikapur'in Claim compensation towards no fault at the offending vehicle (MaJuti Biief facts of the case are \ olved in am accident occmred on Van) No. MP 027/34163 was in 14.8.2000 where the husband of claimant] respondent no. 1 namely Mauindra Pal Singh died. The s re$ppnd¢nt no.3 and insured claimants filed claim on the gro r‘» because of accident on account The learned Tribunal b I liability on Insurance Company involved in the accident. The trl unal while holding so opined that the legality and the effect of considered at the time of fm liabilitv is on both the owner an A perusal of the record sh Ws'that it is not disputed that the - death has taken place as a re liability has been &ed on both d vehicle was said to be owned by y the appellant Company. The d that the death has taken place rash and negligent dlivin’g. impugned order fastened the d held that the said vehicle was appeal against the award dated dditional Motor Accident Claims insmance cover note would be hearing and also held that the Ihsurance Company. ult of motor accident. No fault e owner as well as the Insurance [ddW 1 h ' ’