IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23466 of 2010 RADHEY TANTI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.7.2010 Heard. In spite of the order directing virtually the release of the petitioners on bail on account of non-conclusion of the trial, the learned Judge has placed specious reasons for not releasing the petitioners on bail. The direction of the Court was as follows: “In case the judgment is not delivered in one year’s time, the court below shall itself release the above named petitioner on bail on execution of a bond to its own satisfaction.” It is a matter of concern for this Court that the lower courts appear insensitive to such orders passed by this Court as if they are not obliged to accept them. I believe, the learned Judge was matured enough and understands the implications of the order. I leave the matter at that. Let the petitioners, namely, Radhey Tanti and Ram Lagan Dharhi be released on execution of bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Barh, Patna, in Sessions Trial No. 730A of 2006 arising out of Barh P.S.Case No. 320 of 2005 Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)