CRM- M 33818 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 33818 of 2011 Date of decision : December 15, 2011 Gian Chand, ...... Petitioner v. State of Punjab, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No.105, dated 4.5.2011, registered under Sections 302, 498-A, 34 of the IPC, at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar. On 11.11.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that there was a delay of two years in lodging this FIR and that the petitioner is the uncle of the husband. He has further argued that the mother-in-law has already been released on bail.” Apart from that, counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody since 22.8.2011. Counsel for the respondent is not in a position to deny these assertions. CRM- M 33818 of 2011 ::2:: In these circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Jalandhar. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 15, 2011. JUDGE `kk'