IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Regular Second Appeal No.297 of 2007. Date of decision: 08.09.2008. Smt.Sharda Devi …Appellant Versus Smt.Niri Devi & Others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Appellant: Mr.G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Janesh Gupta, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud,J. This is the plaintiff’s appeal against the judgment of two Courts below dismissing the suit for declaration and possession of the land measuring 11 Bighas 16 Biswas as described in the plaint. The plaintiff approached the trial Court on the basis of a will executed on 9.3.1998 bequeathing the land in her favour and claims that the defendants have wrongfully interfered in the suit land. In order to prove their claims, the parties led evidence which was considered in detail by the trial Court which held that there was no existing or subsisting will in favour of the plaintiff as 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 pleaded. The Court referred to the provisions of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act holding that it should have been witnessed by two more witnesses in the manner provided therein and the propounder should call at least one of the attesting witnesses as a witness. The plaintiff herself had appeared as PW-1 stating that the will had been executed and no attesting witness was examined. Learned counsel for the appellants has urged that the will was proved in accordance with law. From the judgments of both the Courts below I do not find that the claim of the plaintiff has been established in accordance with law. No question of law much less substantial question of law arises for determination in this appeal. There is, thus, no merit in this appeal which is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. All miscellaneous applications shall stand dismissed. September, 8, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.