Ul 2BB BXSH @eTO2 OF 8BB^SI8@ABB 13; B$MSPTO Iteit y»Uti@alfe# A^ ^>"^ ^^" ,.^^y ^-y' ^,.,^ ,-.....................:.^^ ^' BBSPQBBBII'E. Devaaattd TaAa^, S@a oi Sarix-aa W^agir yad*v» A®ldaboixt 32 3reA3?<<i BeiB&deat ot taldea aiiai3UWtBa»aap Aatid^ »^»• KBOSAPAIII^ Mstt»i0»BA(0*&») ABsttilB^iatCT^ (Bxaaf) ©JSff AS2SAS ^WnSBSJJSt^ K©»$»Bxus?®a(e*s^ ji^ fmmsw^vB^ ssssssss 226/221 @p ^iS^iSJSQ^W'W-SSBWw •3Tit?T ^7 ^N^^ iH'ft^ 04/05/21001 :- '^T^IWmK^f^T Noine for the petit^oner. Shri A.G. Ansari a4d Shri Manindra Shrivastava, learried counsel £or the r^spondent. On 16/04/2001 this t^AsaU-^dab^ to identify Court ©ayproceed further '^ ^T£ft^'RT^ff ^ ^fe^t TN^$R ^T •3?RR ^T?^T Court qpeeifically directed that i£the petitioner do^s not appear in person oe ^<3- his answers-books, the in the matter^ In facti the petitioner is avoidiiig ap|>earance in the Court mainly because the answer-books |iave already been seen in the Court and it has been fou<id that his answers were correctlyvalued* It is|infortuQate that neither th< petitioner oor his counse^. is preseiat in the Court« The petition isdi|smissed wit^ costs. The respondent shall be entit|Led to RS^QOO/- &s costs. Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge rt