IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 10080 of 1999 Between: Sk.Sardar S/o.Sk.Mahaboobali O/o.Divisional Engineer (Transco) O&C Division, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Divisional Engineer (Elec) (Transco) O&C Division Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. 2 The Additional Assistant Engineer (Operation-Transco) Kamareddy Town, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of Certiroary, calling for the records relating to the impugned Memo.No.DEE/O&C/KMR/Adm/E2/D.No.89/99 dt.12-4-1999 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same by holding the impugned memo is illegal, irrational, unjust and connot be justified in the eye of law and pass such other order or orders, as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.VENUGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 28-02-2008, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ____________ 29-02- 2008 usd