1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1030 of 2010 Sanjay v. State of Maharashtra and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr O.Y. Kashid, Adv for petitioner Mr C.S. Kaptan, Adv for respdt no.3 Mr S.M. Puranik, Adv for respdt no.4 Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 28th February 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Caste Scrutiny Committee (respondent no.4). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that caste claim of the petitioner as belonging to “Thakur” scheduled tribe is pending for verification before respondent no. 4 Committee and, therefore, prays that direction be given to respondent no. 4 Committee to decide the same within the stipulated period. Learned counsel for respondent no. 4 Committee has no objection if such direction is issued. 3. In the circumstances, we dispose of present writ petition with direction to respondent no. 4 Caste Scrutiny Committee to decided the caste claim of petitioner, if not decided earlier, within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order in accordance with law and 2 procedure applicable in this regard. Till then, services of the petitioner need not be disturbed which is subject to the decision of the Caste Scrutiny Committee. JUDGE JUDGE joshi