IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5605 of 2010 1. MD. FIROZ ALAM S/O MD. FAYEZUDDIN R/O VILL. AND P.O. PACHPAKHARI, P.S. DHAKA, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA-1 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, EAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI), BIHAR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, EAST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DHAKA, EAST CHAMPARAN 6. THE RANGE EDUCATION OFFICER, DHAKA, EAST CHAMPARAN 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER CUM BLOCK TEACHER EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE, DHAKA EAST CHAMPARAN 8. THE PRAMUKH GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ DHAKA, EAST CHAMPARAN 9. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PACHPAKHORI DHAKA, EAST CHAMPARAN ----------- 2 05/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is merit in the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, East Champaran is a non speaking and cryptic order which does not disclose the reason for rejecting the claim of the petitioner. - 2 - From a perusal of the said order the Court is convinced that the Member concerned has failed to give reasons based on which claim of the petitioner has been rejected. In absence of the same it is difficult for this Court to either certify correctness of the order or whether there is infirmity in the order which requires consideration. The impugned order passed by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority in case No. 260 of 2008 dated 25.08.2009 is hereby quashed and the matter is remitted back to the Appellate Authority to re- hear the matter and pass a detailed reasoned order in this regard. This writ application is allowed accordingly. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)