1 CA-5013.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5013 OF 2009 Antush Walmiki Chitalkar .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri V.V. Purwant for the Applicant. Ms R.V. Newton, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 24, 2010 P.C: On 4-11-2008 a dacoity took place in which ornaments worth Rs.7,35,000/- were stolen. A report was given by the jeweller's servant who did not have the detailed description of the property stolen. On 5-11-2008 the jeweller gave a detailed description of 17 items which were stolen and added that it was possible that the stolen property may be more than what he had described. The applicant and other miscreants were apprehended. Sixteen out of the 17 items described by owner of the jewellery shop were recovered at the instance of the applicant. The co-accused who were bailed out are Hanumantha 2 CA-5013.09 Jadhav, Dharmaraj Shikalwad and Manjunath Jadhav. Some silver articles worth about Rs. 10,000/- each were recovered at the instance of Hanumantha and Dharmaraj. The description of the articles stolen in the statement of Madhukar Palankar matches with the articles which were recovered at the instance of the applicant. In view of this, though the applicant has not been identified in the T.I. parade, he is not entitled to bail on the ground of parity since the other two accused who were bailed out and at whose instance silver articles were recovered seems to have received a minor part of the booty. The application is, therefore, rejected. The learned trial Judge would expedite the hearing of the case. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)