IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11198 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ACHUTTY, W/O. UNNEENKUTTY HAJI, AGED 65 YEARS, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, HAREESH M.S., S/O. GIRIJA KUMARI, RESIDING AT HARISREE, P.O.MANKADA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ANGADIPPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPL. GRADE), REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, ANGADIPPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE), P.O.ANGADIPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SPECIAL GRADE SECRETARY, ANGADIPPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL GRADE), P.O.ANGADIPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. V. MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.11198 OF 2010 (Y) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P3, an order passed by the respondent Panchayat rejecting an application made by the petitioner for a building permit. In this writ petition the petitioner mainly relies on Ext.P6, the Government Circular dated 21.4.2009 and the grievance is that Ext.P3 order is passed without considering Ext.P6. A reading of Ext.P3 shows that the Panchayat has not considered Ext.P6 at the time when this order was issued. 2. In view of this, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the Panchayat shall on the production of a copy of this judgment reconsider the petitioner's application, taking into account Ext.P6 also. Fresh order in the matter shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that this court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :