IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 21287 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: December 19, 2008 Ravinder Kumar …Petitioner Versus Chief Administrator, HUDA and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allot a plot to the petitioner by honouring their statement made in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) Rohtak, dated 1.2.2008 (P-3) and in view of the consequential order of the even date passed by the Trial Court in Civil Suit No. 436 of 2002/2004 (P-4), wherein the respondents have admitted the claim of C.W.P. No. 21287 of 2008 the petitioner and made a statement to the effect that Plot No. 66-A would be allotted to him in lieu of Plot No. 31 in the New Sabzi Mandi, Rohtak. The petitioner has also placed reliance on letter dated 20.8.2007, sent by the Chief Administrator-respondent No. 1 to the Executive Officer, Market Committee, Rohtak-respondent No. 3 regarding allotment of Plot No. 31 (P-2). However, needful has not been done. The petitioner has also sent a representation dated 29.4.2008 (P-5) but of no avail. Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representation dated 29.4.2008 (P-5) sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) December 19, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2