Ca 910/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.910/2011 IN S.A.NO.278/2005 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms.Kalyani Tulankar h/f Mr.S.B.Deshmukh for Applicant Mr.Ajay Joshi for Res.2 and 3 CORAM- G.S.Godbole,J. DATE- 28th SEPTEMBER,2011. P.C. . On 7/9/2011 the following order was passed. “ This Civil Application prays for substituted service of notice on Respondent Nos. 2B(i) and 2B(ii) who are also Respondent Nos. 1A and 1B. Mr. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1A - Neela Shrikant Kale, who is also Respondent No. 2B(i). Mr. Joshi states that Respondent Nos. 1B and 1C who are two daughters of Respondent No.1 are married daughters and that their addresses will be furnished to the Advocate for Applicant within two weeks and, alternatively, he will also take instruction as to whether he can get vakalatnama from them. Statement accepted. List after 3 weeks. ” Mr.Joshi has handed over the addresses of Respondent no.1-B and 1-C to the Advocate for the Applicant. Ca 910/11 2 In view of this, the Civil Application for substituted service does not survive and the same is disposed of by granting liberty to file fresh Civil Application, if so arises in future. G.S.Godbole,J.