IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.786 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 M/s.Cheminova India Ltd., )..Applicant Versus Suchitkumar Deshmukh & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Subodh Desai i/by Nilesh S.Das for the applicant. Mr.B.G.Tangsali for respondent no.1. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre APP for the State. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 16.9.2008. PC 1. This is an application for leave to appeal. The accused has been acquitted for committing an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. On perusing the impugned judgment and order and the record & proceedings, I find that the acquittal is based upon cogent and acceptable reasons. It was the defence of the accused that the five cheques in question were amongst 54 cheques which were given to the complainant in the year 2000 as security deposit. A letter to that effect dated 31.7.2000 was produced in the Court. PW-1 who was a Company Secretary of the complainant-company however, displaced ignorance as to whether 54 blank cheques were given or letter dated 31.7.2000 was received. : 2 : The view taken is a possible view. In my opinion, not a fit case to interfere in an appeal against acquittal. Hence, leave refused. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)