-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.768 OF 2006 NO.768 OF 2006 NO.768 OF 2006 Ramesh D. Kadam and anr. ...Appellants v/s Dnayndev S. Dhobale and ors. ...Respondents Mr G.S. Godbole for Appellants. Mr P.R. Arjunwadkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 27TH JULY 2007. -2- P.C. :- 1. The appellants are original plaintiffs. They have filed the suit for removal of encroachment but the Appeal Court, after carefully examining the entire record, has held that the plaintiffs have not ben able to prove that they are in possession of land less than what they are entitled to be in possession of. They have also not succeeded in proving that the defendants are in possession of land in excess of entitlement. These are essential findings of facts. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------