IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1000/2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.885/2009 Subhash M.Satam Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.M.G.Shukla for the applicant Mr.J.P.Kharge,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . This appeal is filed against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act by the learned Special Judge, Greater Bombay by judgment dated 7/7/2009 .The appellant/ accused is convicted for the offences punishable u/s 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to suffer R.I.for two years and fine of Rs.5,000/- i/d to suffer S.I.for six months. The learned counsel submits that in the present matter the complainant was not examined and there are many discrepancies in the evidence. 2] The appeal is admitted. 3] The learned counsel for the appellant prays for bail . The appellant has already been released by the learned Special Judge by invoking provisions of section 389 of Criminal Procedure Code . The same bail to continue with fresh surety . 4] Bail application stands disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)