1 CRI.APPLN.NOS.3661/2009 & 4031/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3661/2009 (Angad Dhondiba Deokate Vs. The State of Mah.) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4031/2010 (The State of Mah. Vs. Angad Dhondiba Deokate) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.NV Gavare, Adv. for applicant/accused Mr.VH Dighe, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 6 th January, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused submits that the applicant since retirement has now settled at Osmanabad. Fresh address is given to learned APP. Simultaneously fresh address will be given by the applicant/accused to the Investigator at Nashik. The conditions of attendance between 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m. on every Sunday, vide order dated 30.09.2008, is not warranted due to persistent cooperation from the applicant/accused to the Investigator. The learned APP also informs almost entire investigation is complete, barring receiving samples 2 CRI.APPLN.NOS.3661/2009 & 4031/2010 for voice recording of the applicant/accused. In the above situation, the application for relaxation of the conditions is allowed. 3) By another application being Criminal Application No.4031/2010, the State has urged to cancel the bail granted in favour of the applicant/accused, as he has not been cooperating and furnishing the necessary details for voice recording. 4) Mr.Gavare, on instructions, informs that the applicant/accused will make himself available to the Investigator on 27th 28th and 29th January, 2011 and will cooperate in any course of investigation that is left over and demanded by the Investigator. 5) In the light of the above statement, cancellation of bail as sought by the State, is not warranted. The application of the state is rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/