Fj(>^'T<*^S!?;^^>."^-^^^.^^^-*»18feS'^i.#.l^^ C-^ \enf] S'NSl ^? .1^5-^ a- ^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(S) N0. ,1^ OF 2011 PETITIONER: James Masih, Aged About- 63 Years, S/o- Late Shri Mohan Masih, R/o- Shakti Nagar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT(S): e.^-v' •0-?%ci< ^ ^.?.'^^ ....••••'"-l ^C^J ^-*°'' ^:^^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Public Works Departments, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2-Engineer- In- Chief Public Works Departments, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) S.Executive Engineer Public Works Departments, Division-Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) 4.Accountant General, Office of the Accountant General, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^s~at^ s' ^^& ,-h i^yL.J'l ;T"i Versus James IV!asih State of Chhattisgarh & Others ¥RITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF INDIA Mr.S. As Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petitloner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State/ respondents No.1 to 3. r\4s. Niiima.Verma, Advocate for'She respondent No.4. •2. (Passed on this 4In day of March, 2011) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the sension committee. TThis Court, in the matter ofVV.P. No. 4642/2004 {Baijnath Manda! v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Commlttee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constltuted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 oassed in W.P. No. 1961/20C Keja Bai Chandrakar v. State Govemmentand others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 {State of C'nhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Manda! and anothei). Thus, this ostltiQH !s SQiisrslv cQVsrsd bv ths iudoinsnt snd ordsr d2i8d 31 of January, 2008 passed In W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by iearned counse! appearing f&r the parties. ^ 3. This petitlon is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the offlce .of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case to the nCommittee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shaii issue notice to t'ne petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shali consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and t'ne officers concerned may fiie additional documents, if necessan/. T'ne entire exercise, including payment of retira! dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. T'ne petitioner shail supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearina for the respondents for Tonivardina the same to the Committee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge