THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WA No.1211 of 2003 Between APSRTC And K. Chandramouli and another THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WA No.1211 of 2005 Oral Judgment : ( Per Sri GM, J ) Heard. This Writ Appeal is directed against the judgment rendered by the learned single Judge allowing the Writ Petition instituted by the 1st respondent-Conductor. The 1st respondent while working as a Conductor in the appellant-Corporation, a check was conducted, pursuant to which disciplinary enquiry was initiated and ultimately the 1st respondent was removed from service on 16-8-1994. He therefore raised a dispute before the Industrial Tribunal which was taken up as I.D.No.56 of 1995. The Industrial Tribunal after holding an enquiry conﬁrmed the orders of removal holding that the 1st respondent-Conductor is responsible for the allegations made against him, hence, he approached this Court in W.P.No.21739 of 2001. As per the charges there was issuance of tickets from diﬀerent blocks rather than from the block which is concerned. The learned single Judge of this Court while adverting to the charges held that the charge as framed does not reﬂect any allegations to be construed as misconduct against the 1st respondent and that there was no clear mistake in issuance of tickets from the block, other than the block concerned even though the said blocks were not at all issued by the Depot Manager, inasmuch as the employee entered the complete details of the ticket numbers sold by him to several passengers, faithfully. It is also further seen from the record that the 1st respondent having sold the tickets has deposited the money into depot and that he has also entered the ticket details in the records, which shows that the conduct of the 1st respondent is bona ﬁde one. Hence, no misconduct is attributable. In the circumstances, order of learned single Judge in allowing the Writ Petition directing reinstatement without any backwages needs no interference by this Court. The Writ Appeal is meritless and is accordingly dismissed conﬁrming the order of the learned single Judge. The appellant-Corporation is directed to reinstate the 1st respondent within four weeks from today. No costs. GM, J NRR, J Dt 2-12-2011/kk Note : Issue cc in three days THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WA No.1211 of 2005 2-12-2011