HIGHJT'OURI QEniUQLCmAILJRmE Qw'lliTIlSGARJ‘i ;§L'=A§PLLB ’ Shlvprasad S/o Balwant $mha Age 28 Yrs ‘ R/o VIN Kopra Distt Ralpur , Mahesh Kumar Ahwa Sic Jal Sungh R/o Mam Road Mana Camp, Raipur Nahonal Insurance Co Ltd By DIVIsmnal Manager Mebm Mahal GE Road Ralpur (CG) PJ§§ent Shn Raja Sharma learned counsel for the appellants (ORAL ORDER) (Passed on 15‘“ February, 2005) The followmg order of the Court was passed by Dlhp Raosaheb Deshmukh J ln a death case the appellants have preferred this appeal for enhancement of compensation on the ground that learned MACT has failed ‘ to consrder the Income of the deceased from the occupatron of motor mechanic and also from the garage run by hrm However on perusal of the rmpugned award passed by the learned MACT we fmd that the appellants _ drd not adduee any evidence relating“ to'the assertion made by them. ‘ l l g , ‘ / / 1 1 I _ CORAM HON’BLE SHRI S R NAYAK C J HON BLE SHRI D R DESHMUKH J I 1 MA. N0.1 124 OF 2005 \ AEEEnLnLANJ'; 1. x Smt APPLICANT Dipaln‘anl Singh Wlo Sohanla! ' ' Chlma t _ Aged About 45 . Sohanlal Chlma S/o S/o Lambhoomal Aged 48 Yrs Both R/o Devbhog, Teh Garlaband Dlstt ’ ’ “Although, they“ have stated‘that the deceased had employed six person$ in his garage, yet none was examined by them. Learned MACT also observed that-appellants did not examine either the owner of the garage or tiled any, ‘ ' document whatsoever to Show the income from the oecupation cf motor; mechanic. In that View 0f the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the compensation of Rs.)3,20IDOO/~ awarded by the learned MACT does not call for any interference. The appeal is devoid of merit and it is acnordinglyi dismissed. No. costs; Sty; l ”I sci/- l l .v > ifaDiliy naosaheb Dishinukh/ ‘ J 6‘ chiefR Justice l Jud‘ge,1l‘ . .1 gxll,‘ g l( _ , l. l