IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6170/2010 Decided on:6.10.2010 _____________________________________________ Anjana Devi and others. …Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366 and Mool Raj Upadhaya versus The State 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 of Himachal Pradesh and others, reported in 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of work charge status strictly in accordance with the principles laid down in Gauri Dutt and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366 and Mool Raj Upadhaya versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, reported in 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316 with all the consequential benefits. Needful be done within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 6.10.2010 *awasthi*