IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22479 of 2011 Vishwanath Yadav S/O Late Ganga Ram Yadav, resident of village Teghra, Police Station Babubarhi, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, H.R.D., Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 3. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 4. The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. 5. The Principal, Chethwar Mahto Janta (C.M.J.) College, Donwari Hat, Khutauna, District Madhubani. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 20.12.2011. Heard Shri Arun Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to S.C.17 appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/State of Bihar and also learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 4/Lalit Narayan Mithila University. The petitioner, who retired on 31.7.2008 as Reader and head of the Department of Mathematics from Chethwar Mahto Janta College, Madhubani under Lalit Narayan Mithila University, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay the total amount of Rs.2,85,006.25 relating to difference of salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to Annexure-1 to the 2 writ petition and it was submitted that the College had already issued certificate showing the dues of difference of salary. On perusal of the writ petition, it appears that petitioner, without demanding justice before the competent authority, has directly approached this Court. Accordingly, the court is of the opinion that petitioner, if so advised, may file representation before respondent no.3/Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University in respect of claim made in the present writ petition within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the court expects that respondent no.3 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing the dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within two months form the 3 date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)