IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No.89 of 2006 Bakshi Chand … Revisionist Versus State of Uttaranchal & four others … Respondents Dated: June 02, 2008 Sri K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the applicant/revisionist Sri Harish Pujari, learned Adll. G.A. for the State HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment order dated 25.03.2006 passed by Sessions Judge, Dehradun in S.T. No.208 of 2004, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has acquitted the respondents – Karnail Singh, Jarnail Singh, Balbir Singh & Smt. Talwa Devi, for the offence punishable u/s 304 IPC. Sri K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist stated at bar that he does not want to press his revision and submitted that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist at bar, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dharam Veer, J.) Rajeev Dang