IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRIMINAL REVISION No2 3/2006 APPLICANT S‘ingia Banch Ram das Jangde S/o Late Kunjram Jangde aged about 44 years R/o Balco nagar P.S Balco Nagar District Korba C.G. VERSUS — / 1. Smt. Kunti jangd‘e W/oRamdas Jangde aged about 35 years . Sateyndra Singh S / o Ramdas Jangde aged about 20 years. . Rajendra Singh S/o Ramdas Jangde aged about 18 years. . Ku. Satyalata D/o Ramdas Jangde aged about 16 years. .Ku. Shilpa D/o Ramdas Jangde aged about 14 years. . Laxmendra Singh S / o Ramdas Jangde aged about 10 years. Non-applicant no. 4 8a 6 through its natural guardian mother Smt. Kunti Jangde both R/o LIG—74 Rajendra Prasad Nagar Korba District Korba C.G. . M CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397 RM! 401 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 & SECTION 19(4)'6E‘ FAMILY COURT , ACT . z I" NONAPPLICANTS XI—HC-78 EW,W,W mm o ...§t»:.t%€.>£:.?k%mg zooé mm (W) ’mwmé’fwsré‘rm mwm 35mm .5/10/20Q6 Shn' Y. Chaturvedi; cotmsei for the appellant. None for non-applicants Wthough served. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for the ‘appeliant, on being asked repeatedly by this Court, is unable to point 0111 any illegaiity or manifest error of law as VW i} d justify any interference in exercise of revisional jurisdictien by the ourt'. On beingasked, he is not even able to answer whether the applicant has led any evidenCe ‘before the Family Court relating to his income or whether the applicant owns agricultural lands and conducts agricultural operation. i I~M £02m L9F mauJ.” k. In this View of the'rnatter, this‘criminal revision No. 243/2006 is dismissed in liming. In-View ofthe above, MCarP No. 78-l{200’6 also stands dismissed. l Sdl— Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh l Judge [r1 K, .. . i‘ > ih 1‘) Priya l t i