BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K.CHANDRASEKHARADAS(RETD. JUDGE) & SHRI K.J.THOMAS STANLEY(ADVOCATE) & SMT. SAIRA RAVIKUMAR (MEMBER) THURSDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2011 / 27TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1994 of 2005(D) ------------------------------ CRA.115/2005 of SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM CC.1271/2001 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER/ APPELLANT/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------------------------- MATHEW ANTONY, PALLATHU HOUSE, PUTHIYA ROAD, PALARIVATTOM. BY ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA SRI.S.RUSSEL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/STATE AND COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. K. VARGHESE BABY, KALATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KOLLAKUDIMUGAL, THRIKKAKARA ROAD, PALARIVATTOM. ADV. SRI.ICANS C.CHAMAKKALA FOR R2 SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S FOR R2 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ON 18/08/2011, THE ADALAT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SRI. T.K. CHANDRASEKARA DAS (RETD.JUDGE) AND SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY(ADVOCATE) AND SMT. SAIRA RAVIKUMAR (MEMBER) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- HCLSC(LA) No. 556/2011 Crl.R.P. No. 1994 of 2005 Dated this the 18th day of August, 2011 AWARD We have discussed the mater with the parties and counsels who are present. As already agreed the parties have settled the matter for payment of Rs. 52,000/-(rupees fifty two thousand only) to the 2nd respondent by the revision petitioner. The revision petitioner has agreed that the aforesaid amount of Rs. 52,000/- (rupees fifty two thousand can be withdrawn from the court deposit made by the revision petitioner in C.C. 1271/2001 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate – I, Ernakulam. The second respondent K. Varghese Baby can make an application before the aforesaid court to withdraw Rs. 52,000/-(rupees fifty two thousand) from that court. It has also been agreed that the balance amount in court deposit can be withdrawn by the revision petitioner. The 2nd respondent has made a statement that he is not in custody of document purported to be a title deed for one cent in Sy. No. 198/1 in Poonithura Village and the revision petitioner has accepted this Crl.R.P.No.1994 of 2005 : 2 : statement. In view of the settlement reached by the parties the conviction and sentence awarded by courts below will stand set aside. It is made clear before us that the withdrawal of Rs. 52,000/- (rupees fifty two thousand) is in full and final satisfaction of all claims of 2nd respondent. An award is passed accordingly. sd/- SRI. T.K. CHANDRASEKARA DAS (RETD.JUDGE) sd/- SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY(ADVOCATE) sd/- SMT. SAIRA RAVIKUMAR (MEMBER) //True copy// P.A. To Judge. kp