IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6183 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 6183 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 6183 OF 2008 Shri Ashok Sadashiv Kulkarnin and others. ... Petitioners. V/s. Smt.Mhasoba Devalaya Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondents. P.D.Dalvi for the petitioners. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 1st September 2008. DATED: 1st September 2008. DATED: 1st September 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 4th August, 2008 passed by the Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court, Mumbai whereby the appeal filed by the respondent- Society was allowed and the judgment and order passed by the Co-operative Court, Kolhapur in Dispute No.281/2005 came to be quashed and set aside and the dispute came to be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of case of Vasundhara Ashokrao Patil v. Rajaram Bapu Vasundhara Ashokrao Patil v. Rajaram Bapu Vasundhara Ashokrao Patil v. Rajaram Bapu Sahakari Bank Ltd. Sahakari Bank Ltd. Sahakari Bank Ltd., 2003 (4) Mh.L.J. 315. 3. No case is made out by the petitioner to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Court below is a reasonable and possible view. Petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)