: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.149 OF 2010 Shrirang Baban Nangare & Ors. ... Applicants V/s. Chandrakant Shripati Pachange ... Respondent Mr.Sachin Punde for Applicants Mr.Jaydeep S. Deo for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: MARCH 4, 2010 P.C.: 1. The applicants have moved this Court against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial Court as well as the appellate Court of the Small Causes Court, Pune. Both the Courts have found that the respondent-landlord had established his case that he required the suit premises bonafide. They have found that his requirement was reasonable and that greater hardship would be caused to the landlord if the decree was not passed in his favour. The Courts have also considered the fact that the applicants have not cared to establish through evidence that they had sought alternate premises and, therefore, the trial Court has therefore decreed the suit. The appellate Court has confirmed the view taken by the trial Court. 2. In my view, the findings recorded by the Courts below cannot be termed as erroneous nor is there any jurisdictional error which requires to be corrected by this Court. 3. Civil revision application dismissed.