-H f^'3 ^^ff^ ?.t- '5Si:i^ts' Tji-t.u'.it 1«5-8<-';.•':: /.sr-y? THE CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No....\,2\\......./..2011 PETTIONER ^^ ,^v^^!> ^•-<{^" ..--^\ ^-•€^'..-<^ ^'^v' ..^ \^.....^\ Vs-'' RESPONDENTS 2. Jagdish Kuraar Dhruv, S/o Shri Am.ar Singh Dhruv, Aged about 22 years, Village Thakurpali Block Bagbahra District Mahasamund (C,G) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary Panchyat and sa&iii- wetfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) &ktJi^r e^eCAtinW- &|rlsf'^'» Janpad Panchyat poudi Uproda District Korba (C.G) p^ish, Kav'&l WRIT PETITION UNDJ^ ARTICLE U/A-226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR ^-»...;rs!^<. /^'^ "%, H 'ViSS^. t) .¥ "S, "!;-..„<!<" ,.t? '^. ^Ss^ .^ ^&lasfe^ HIGH COUR'F.OF ©HHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1311 OF 2011 PETITiONER RESPONDENTS Jagdish Kumar Dhruv Versus State of Chhattisgarh & AnoBier C/Vrit Petition under ArBcle 226 ofthe Coretitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for ttie petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for fte Stato. ORDERfORAD (Passed6nWis10m^lay<rfMa^ 1. Learned coynsel a earjng for the^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Rerrnjssion of thjs^eourt towithdraw this petition wifeBtoerty to ? pureue th'8 representation idated 5.2.2011 (Anjrw<ure P-5); wherein, itis^tati^ ftiat^^^ was neilher practicable nor possibte to r®S®ysiiTlSFmption andappear inttie counseling on 27,12.2010. a 2. Accordingly, fte Collector, Kprba is directed to look into the , gri8V$ii^(tf^ P^itipner, asrepresentedtoNm<m 5.2.2^ (Annexyre P-5), as early as possible, |M^ferably^wiyTin a ; perjod oftwo weeks from ttie date pf recejptpf a eepy ofttiis ; prder andjaass an appropria(e prder, in ac^prdanGe wntMaw/ ; 3. Accordingly, Ihe writ petitlpn is djsmissed as withdrawn with the abov® stated observation. —:— /- Satish K. AgBihotri asl-iok iiiiin '^Si