/ C¢ {m Laww Bmm S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I'I‘ISGARH AT BI SPUR CH TTISGARH S) WRIT PETmo No.é&39 /2006. 1. Durga Prasad Sahu, son of Rooplal f, Sahu, aged about 41 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi Lcdhi Khapri, Block Development Saja, Education Dist. Bematara, District Durg Durg, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER: Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The”, Secretary School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The District Education Officer, / Bematara, Dist. Durg, Chhattisgarh t 3. The Block Education Officer, Block J/ 4% Saja, Dist. Durg. C,G. ('5 a L ‘ \@ §§ N \ r 71’ 9WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 26 I F THE \% 3‘ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , r g y ' f n‘ 3aW, 'Ww,W .ia2.e.é§.2...6.%9ag m m / XI-HC-22 mm WW m m m w ‘ padma 16.11.2006 Shri OP Sahu, counsel for ‘rhe petitioner. Shri Sandaep‘ Yadav , hy 6A for- fhe msponden‘l's / Stow. Heard. If is no? dispu'red by Adminis‘rmi'ive Tribunal in i reached i'rs finality. Having considered ar bo‘l’h 1he parties and withou' the case, it is directed representation along with c Authority within a period of shall decide that representation in an objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation after sed by the petitioner and the impact of Tribunal dated 31.01.2000 in the OA considering all the points rai the order passed by the No.1452/1998. With the aforesaid dirfction, the petition stands disposed of: Sd/- f V.K. Shrivastava Judge the State that the order passed by the 3A No.1452/1998 dated 31.01.2000 has uments advanced by learned counsel for r expressing any opinion on the merit of that petitioner may Submit detailed opy of this petition to the Competent lone month from today; and who, in turn m