IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5977 of 2010 LAKSHMAN SHARMA son of Phanilal Sharma, R/O/V-Piprakhurd, P.S.-Bhaptiyahi, Dist.- Supaul. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 3.3.2010. Heard Mr. Arun, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State. The Petitioner is in custody in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No.35 of 2004 registered for the offences under sections 406/34 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was appointed as an agent for construction of Panchayat Bhawan under Jawahar Rojgar Yojana scheme. In scheme no.2 of 1991, the allegation against the petitioner is that though he received payment, but he did not complete the work. In the first information report other agents were also made accused, who were allotted work under different schemes. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition, submits that the petitioner is in jail since 9.4.2009 and he is ready to co-operate during the trial. He also submits that some of the accused persons have been granted bail by this court. Without going into the merit of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No.35 of 2004 with a condition that on each and every date he shall remain present in court failing which 2 his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, if due to any exigency, it is felt that the petitioner may not appear on a particular date then prior permission will have to be taken from the court concerned. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)