IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.19725 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 22, 2011 JAGBIR SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYAN & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Jashandeep Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Respondent No.4-Mukesh Kumar has been appointed Lambardar for Village Reveli, Tehsil and District Sonepat, by Collector, Sonepat. Appeal and revision petition filed by the petitioner have been dismissed. I have considered the comparative merit of respondent No.4 and the petitioner, as given out in para-6 of order dated 28.3.2007 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Collector. On perusal of the impugned orders, I find that the comparative merit has been considered to arrive at a conclusion that respondent No.4 would be more suitable to be appointed as Lambardar. The impugned orders do not call for judicial review. No ground for interference in extra ordinary writ jurisdiction is made out. The petition is dismissed. March 22, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?