IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1224 of 2006 KAMLA DEVI & ORS Versus KAMLESH KUMAR MAHTO @ MANNU ----------- 2 21.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. The approach of the Court below, rejecting to admit certain documents being not on record by the defendants/tenants, cannot be said to be suffering from any material irregularity or jurisdictional error. However, taking into consideration the interest of justice as also the explanation that the original defendant Rohan Prasad had died and the burden of prosecuting the litigation came on the petitioners, who were not aware of such documents, this Court on an offer given by the Counsel for the petitioner to suitably compensate the complainant/landlord by paying a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), would direct the Court below to take this documents as mentioned in Annexure-3 to this application into evidence on making payment of aforesaid amount within a period of two months from today. The petitioners however must complete their evidence at the earliest so that the eviction suit of the year 2000 gets disposed of expeditiously preferably within a period one year from the date of 2 receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this civil revision application is allowed and the Court below is directed to take the documents of the petitioners as contained in Annexure-3 on record on payment of Rs. 10,000/- by the petitioner to the plaintiff/opposite party within a period of two months. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)