^?-r^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. '? t/^?^/20l0 PETITIONERS ^ ./^ O / ^j s^^ ^%y .o.^ir/'y A^y wy ^^/'y ' ^".?" ^! RESPONDENTS: / %\ a; ^- 1^ ^ <^ \<^ / ^ ^^ ^•^ 1. Ku. Bachnika Padhi, D/o Late Shri Rendudhar Padhi, aged about 49 years, resident of Village & Post Bakavand, Jagdalpur District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ,2. Shekhar Prasad Joshi, son of Shn Lalit Prasad Joshi, aged about 52 years, resident of Village 8s Post Baniyagaon, Vyaha- Bhanpyri, Jagdalpui-, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh / 3. Krishna Chandra Panigrahi, son of Shri Ganpati Prasad. Panigrahi, aged about 47 years, resident of Village Kawangaon, Post - Guriya, Vyaha- Bbanpuri,- Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ^4. Ugrashen Joshi, son of Shri Ram Bharosa Joshi, aged about 50 years, resident. of Para .Munda Gudha, Village & Post Kumli, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattigarh . :- ^5. . Sukhrara Singh Thakur, son of Shri Sitaram Singh Thakur, agcd about 55 years, residerit of Village 8s Post - Baniyagaon, Vyaha- Bhanpuri, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh VERSUS / \. State ofChhattisgarh, . / Through: The Secrefary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur; Chhattisgarh ^•2. Director . Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhaftisgarh 3. CoIlector[JagdaIpur] . District - Bastar, Chhattisgarh : A. Distriet' Education Officer, Jagdalpyr, District —Bastar, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNUER ART!CLE-226^F_THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA OT^T ^FT R-t TT^n •iflRi?T sft*fi<s ^^ •<<i-4i<?PT, yiii.M'Kc, fsidiy^ ,..U.P..e^..)...t^.:.ai^ sn^r'q^? (y<f^«<<iT) tsnw^fcfsii^i 8B : HOS'BI,B MR. JUSTK3E PRtTfflaEBifnmHEBR 23.09.2010 Shri Anupam Dube^, coun^el Shri Vaibhav Gaverdhan, Grievance of the petition^rs though they have been selected f<| till date their appointment orderj submitted that selection of the p) 2010 but they have not been give|-i (Annexure P/6J. Counsel for the petitioner to fhe respondents for issuing petitioners. State counsel subinits t1 representation before the respo^dent decided after considering all th^ with law. Accordin^y, the petition^i petition with the aforesaid Ubertjy. fresh representation by the pefit from the date of receipt-pf cop^ respondent No.4 to pass approprjate It is made clear that this t on merits of the case and the auf to decide the representation in ac|< ^il^tn*di 'RW^if "if "fe^t <fo)^!< ^3ifOT3i!^n for the petitipners. t.1. for tftcState. ^rs in the present petition are tbat |ir the post of Assistant Teachers but fe have not been issued. It has been stitioners was made on l»tFebruary benefit ofcircuiar dated 09,6.2008 ^ubmits that direction may be issued ^ppointment order in favour of the |iat let the petitioners make fresh N0.4 and the saine vrould be aspects of the case in accordance rs are pemiitted to withdraw this '. In the eventuality of making any ioners within a period of two weeks f of this order, it is expeoted from ate order in accordance with law. ;ourt has not expressed any opinion .hority concemed would be at libgrty :ordance with law. ___-———- -&wkat