IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M 34197 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 3.2.2009 Dhapan Devi and others ...Petitioners Versus Neeru Bala ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr.PS Jammu, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.SK Jain, Advocate for the respondent. *** Harbans Lal, J. This petition has been moved by Dhapan Devi and others under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in a complaint case No.525- 1 of 2008 dated 11.9.2008/13.9.2008 bearing caption Neeru Bala vs. Sunil Kumar and others (Annexure P-1). I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Vide order dated 24.12.2008 passed by this Court, the petitioners were directed to appear before the learned trial Court within two weeks from that day or the date fixed by the trial Court, whichever was earlier and the petitioners were not to be taken into custody till then. The learned counsel for the petitioners has produced a photostat copy of the order purportedly passed by Mr.SK Sharma, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sirsa on 2.1.2009. As would be apparent from this order, the petitioners, in compliance with the order dated 24.12.2008 passed by this Court, have furnished the requisite bail bonds. This being a complaint case, the interrogation is not required and no recovery is to be effected. So, the order dated 24.12.2008 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of. February 3, 2009 (Harbans Lal) gsv Judge