1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1488 OF 2008 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2009 M/s Trimbak Investments & Finance ..... Petitioners Services Ltd. & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..... Respondents Mr.Mihir Gheewala, Advocate for petitioners Mr.P.P. Shinde, APP for State Ms.Duhita Lewis i/by Prasad Das,Advocate for respondent no.2. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 30th July 2009. PC : 1. In this Writ Petition for quashing complaint under Section 403, 406, 409 read with 34 Indian Penal Code, the petitioners file the present application stating that the petitioners and respondent no.2 have arrived at out of court settlement and signed consent terms dated 29th July 2009 in that regard. The parties desire to compound the complaint in respect of offences that are compoundable and seek quashing of the proceedings in respect of the offence which is non compoundable i.e. offence under Section 409 Indian Penal Code. The consent terms signed by the parties and their respective Advocates are taken on file and marked “X” for identification. The affidavit of respondent no.2 tendered stating that he has no objection for quashing of the complaint as prayed is taken on file. The parties are allowed to compound the complaint 2 in respect of offences punishable under Sections 403 and 406 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code. As regards the offence punishable under Section 409 read with Section 34 is concerned, the complaint in that regard is hereby quashed. The Criminal Writ Petition is disposed off in terms of consent terms. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition, the Criminal Application No.243 of 2008 does not survive, the same is accordingly disposed off. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.)