IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1241 OF 2009 Between: Mopidi Konamma ..... PETITIONER AND S.Rama Subba Reddy .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1241 OF 2009 O R D E R : This revision petition is directed against the order dated 12.02.2009 in I.A.No.100 of 2009 in O.S.No.191 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur, whereunder the plaintiff’s request for amendment of plaint was rejected. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff, who filed the suit for recovery of money towards the value of damages for the alleged breach of covenant of title. The defendant filed a written statement contesting the suit claim and admittedly, both the parties adduced their oral and documentary evidence. While the suit was coming up for arguments, the plaintiff/revision petitioner filed I.A.No.100 of 2009 under Order 6 Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code, seeking amendment of the plaint. The said application was dismissed by the Court below by order, dated 12.02.2009 and aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The material available on record shows that the plaint initially filed itself contained a specific plea that due to fraud played by the defendant the plaintiff was deprived of the land and incurred loss. By virtue of the proposed amendment, as no additional plea was sought to be added, the Court below had rightly dismissed the application for amendment of plaint. The discretion exercised by the Court below, on application of mind to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material already available on record, warrants no interference by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ​_____________ Date: 22.03.2010 G. ROHINI, J. Ivd