-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 4149 of 2007 Pravin Surajmal Lunkad ..Petitioner vs. 1. The Authorised Officer Krishna Valley Coop.Bank Ltd. and others ...Respondents Shri R.S.Datar for petitioner. Shri Sandeep Kurne i/b Shri U.R.Manakapure for respondent no.1. Smt.V.S.Mhaispurkar, A.G.P. for respondent no.2. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 7th January, 2008 7th January, 2008 7th January, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar on 18th April, 2007 in the Revision Application which was preferred by him to challenge the order of the Authority under sec.88 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Authority by order dated 10th April, 2007 rejected the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the proceedings under sec.88 and directed that the matter will proceed further. The petitioner is one of the person against whom the action is initiated. He challenged the order before the Divisional Joint Registrar who has refused to interfere only on the ground that he is one who -2- has directed initiation of the proceedings. The petitioner has no objection for appearing before him and arguing his revision application. 2. To my mind, the petition can be disposed of by directing the concerned Divisional Joint Registrar to hear and dispose of the revision application afresh in accordance with law without being influenced by the observations in the order dated 18th April, 2007. Both sides agree that they would appear before the Divisional Joint Registrar aon 15th January, 2008. The Divisional Joint Registrar to then proceed with the revision application and dispose it of expeditiously. Petition is disposed of. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)