IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.56 of 2007 SHIV JANAM SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 8. 23.7.2008 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner’s counsel was not present on earlier two days. Perused the record. In the instant writ application prayer of the petitioner is to complete the investigation of the case and apprehend the accused persons. Learned counsel for the State submits that in course of investigation F.I.R. named accused persons were found to be innocent and Jai Ram Singh and Satish Singh were found to be accused and as such, chargesheet has been submitted against them in this case. From the counter-affidavit filed by the State, I find that the case has been properly investigated and the accused persons, namely, Jai Ram Singh and Satish Singh. have been apprehended and produced before the Magistrate and chargesheet has been submitted against them. In view of the above, no further relief can be granted to petitioner and accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. sudip ( S. P. Singh, J )