THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P. Nos. 24, 29 and 46 of 2011 Dated. 11–02-2011 C.R.P.No. 24 of 2011 Between: Bokka Muniah and another. …Petitioners Vs. Kudupudi Padmavathi. …Respondent C.R.P.No. 29 of 2011 Between: Bokka Muniah and another. …Petitioners Vs. Kudupudi Padmavathi …Respondent C.R.P.No. 46 of 2011 Between: Bokka Muniah and another. …Petitioners Vs. Kudupudi Padmavathi …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.Nos. 24; 29 and 46 of 2011 ORAL COMMON ORDER: These three revision petitions are directed against interlocutory orders of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District in O.S.No. 128 of 2009. The revision petitioners are the defendants in the suit. It is now stated by Sri G. Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the revision petitioners that after filing of these revision petitions, the suit itself was disposed of and a decree was passed in favour of the respondent-plaintiff and that in the circumstances, the revision petitioners would prefer appellate remedy and would urge the issues raised in these revisions in the appeal. In view of the assertion made on behalf of the revision petitioners, the revision petitions are dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Dated: 11-02-2011 Pvks/*