CWP(T) No. 6904/2008 23.08.2010 Present: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. Petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “i) to declare that the appointment letter ANNEXURE A/1 issued in favour of the applicant is legal and valid; ii) to direct respondent No.2 to accept the joining report of the applicant; iii) to send for the records of the case; iv) to award costs of the petition in favour of the applicant.” 2. For the post of Vidya Upasak respondents had issued an advertisement. Petitioner applied for the same and was duly selected. Petitioner was asked to produce the original certificates and documents before joining. At that stage it was discovered that petitioner did not fulfill the eligibility criteria by securing minimum pass percentage in his Matriculation. 3. Hence order of selection was withdrawn. It is this order which has been assailed by the petitioner. 4. Having gone through the petition I am of the view that no legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Pass percentage of 40%, as is evident from Annexure A-2 pages 10 & 11, was for the reserved category and not to the general category. Petitioner claims to be from general category and not from OBC, SC/ST categories. Hence, the present petition being devoid of merit is dismissed. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. August 23, 2010 (rana)