IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33758 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR MANDELA @ MANOJ YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 6.10.2010. Heard Sri Amrit Abhijat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. On perusing the impugned order and the statement of the victim which is one of the enclosures as Annexure-2 to the present petition, it does not appear possible for this court to enter into the factual matrix of the case and pass an order after perusing the police records. The same could be done by the court of Sessions as and when the case, i.e., Chhatapur P.S.Case No.154 of 2007 is committed to it. As and when the case is committed to the court of Sessions and it decides to hear the accused persons under Sections 227 and 228 of the Cr.P.C., it shall peruse the materials in the case diary deeply and record its reasons as to what offence could be said to be committed by this petitioner on facts collected so far by the police. If the facts do not constituted any offence then the petitioner shall stand discharged by the court below. With the above observation, this petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)