CWP No.13895 of 2010 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13895 of 2010 Date of Decision: 06.08.2010 M/s. Puri Construction Pvt. Limited ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. AG, Haryana. ..... Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State. With the consent of the parties and in view of the prayer made in the petition, the petition is being disposed of at the motion stage. The petitioner is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 claims to be a Real Estate Developer in and around the National Capital Territory of Dehli. The petitioner had earlier obtained various licences in terms of the Haryana Development and Regulation Urban Areas Act and deposited the licence fee in accordance with the rules. Petitioner however, later withdrew some of the applications for grant of licences. It is stated that the amount of Rs.2,13,91,282/- is refundable to the petitioner on account of fee deposited by it. The petitioner has made an application dated 28.04.2009 for refund of the excess amount of the licence fee. The grievance of the petitioner is that the licence fee CWP No.13895 of 2010 2 has not been refunded to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No.2 is directed to decide the application of the petitioner (Annexure P-3). In view of the above submission, petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to say that in the event, the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 06.08.2010 sharmila