IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3302 of 2010 CHANDRASHEKHAR UPADHAYA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 03. 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the opposite parties. The Court in C.W.J.C. No. 18508 of 2009, from which the present contempt application arises had more than adequately observed that once the petitioner had superannuated, the question of any promotion granted to him without passing the Accounts examination etc. were irrelevant as the master servant relationship stood severed. The apprehension of the petitioner from the letter dated 19.6.2009 of the technical advisor is therefore misconceived. No recovery can be made from the petitioner on that ground. From Annexure-K dated 9.5.2011, of the show cause issued by the Treasury Officer, addressed to the opposite parties in the third supplementary show cause, it stands confirmed now that only orders for recovery of Rs.75225/- had been passed on 16.7.2001, but, in fact, no recovery had been effected. The Writ Court had prohibited any recovery. If, no recovery has been affected, the order of the Court does not stand flouted. The contempt proceeding stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)