IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 20453 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MRS MARY JOSE, W/O.JOSE, AGED 45 YEARS KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, MARIKA PO PALAKUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 686 662 2. JOSE K.K., S/O.KORA KURUTTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, MARIKA PO PALAKUZHA , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 686 662 3. THOMAS THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS VIRIPARAMBIL HOUSE MARIKA PO PALAKUZHA,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 686 662 BY ADV. SRI.C.J.JOY SMT.SHOBA NAIR SMT.VALSAMMA KURIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DY.DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS KAKKANAD PO, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, PALAKUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PALAKUZHA PO, KOOTHATTUKULAM ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 686 686 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM 6. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER ERNAKULAM. 7. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD REP BY THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER GANDHI NAGAR,ERNAKULAM. WP(C).No. 20453 of 2010(F) 8. MELVIN GEORGE, W/O.GEORGE PROPRIETRESS , M/S. THOMSON DESIGNER TITLES P.O.MARIKA, PALAKUZHA ,KOOTHATTUKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 686 662 9. THANKACHAN GEORGE PUNNOOS MYAAKKAREPPURATHU (H) MARIKA PO PAKKUZHA,KOOTHATTUKULAM PIN 686 686,ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS,SC,POLL.C.BOAR FOR R7 SRI.N.K.KARNIS FOR R3 SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN FOR R8 & 9 SRI.NIREESH MATHEW FOR R8 & 9 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI K.RAMESH FOR R1-3,5 SHRI N.K.KARNIS FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 02/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.20453/2010-F ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move again if required. The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.8 and 9 submitted that writ petition has been filed suppressing material facts. Whatever that be, the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms