1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION No. 2572 of 2010 Shaikh Haider Shaikh Amir ...Petitioner Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ...Respondent ..... Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the Petitioner ..... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 29th MARCH, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment and order in complaint (ULP) 53 of 2006, dated 14-01-2009. The Learned Member, Industrial Court, Jalna, in para No. 5 of its judgment and order has considered the point of limitation as well as contention of the petitioner about his entitlement of salary, increments and other benefits. The Learned Member, taking into consideration inordinate delay in filing the complaint and also the fact that, there are no specific pleadings by the petitioner in complaint, has rejected the complaint. 2 2. After hearing the counsel appearing for the petitioner and after careful perusal of the judgment and order passed by the Learned Member, Industrial Court, Jalna, I do not think that the case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction. Hence, Writ Petition is rejected. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) SDM* WP2572.10