^i'S^"-*-^^ ;V-..v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH At BILASPUR SinaleBench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshniukh. J. Civii Revision No. 72 of 20GS ApDSicants ' 1. ShYami-si!,agedabout50years;"S/Q BabutelLodhi, , .:-t 2.v Bhushan lai, aged about 30 years, S/o Bhushanlai Lodhi, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (DefendanVRsspondentNo«3&4) Bdth are residentofjvilJage'Garraja'absiJ Khairagarh, DistrictRajnandgaon.(C.G.) Versus ,' ".;;, ,' '••:;:-..;'..':.c:'.;.' i .••"'. ..' . ' •• '- '".•' • "•'•, ^ Non-appilcants ', ..••^A. Kanwai Ram, aged jabout 51 Jyears^S/o Babulai, Caste Lodhi, Agricutturist Resident of Viiiage Gar?Bpar,^T'&hsil Khairagarh, DistriotRajnandgaon^^ , .•f-:f°':.:'. .' , -\ " ':,(PIaintJTS»ppeHant)"^:: ^ 2; Babulal, aged about 75 yQafe,; ^o^alya Lodhi, resident of village Garra, i~Bhsi!^ ' Khairagaro, Di^rictRajnandgaoh^.cl^). (Defendant/RespondlenfNo.l^ 3. Ketki Bai, ag^ aBout 70 years,.^Wo Babuiai. (Dead),. (Defendaiit/R@sp$|r5d€nt^ , " -,- No.2)1~liroughfegal.|Re^^ 3-a,;^Smt;Grya'Bai,3gedra Babulai, VWo Baimukund Lodnj,:R®sident of: • Viijage : Maliroomkala, -^^^^^^^- •Khairag.arfcJ"./. •••.Yrl' .';..'• ,„"";"••' .;:.;':.:^:/':'1"; 3-b Smt. Amarik Baj, aged aboyfc 46 years, D/o Babulal Lodhi,^WA3 Babulal Lodhi, Resident jDf.lViiiage' Singhauri, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) ;3-c ^Smt. Sumjtra: Bai, i^ged abbut 43 years, D/o Babuial'Lodhi, W/o-Santu La] Lbeihi, : Resident of Viliage Singhauri, laiisil' Khairagarh, DJsfcrictRajnandgaon, (C.G.) 4: State of Chhattisg^rh, Through Collector Rajnandgaon,;Dis!:fictRajnandgaon(CG) (Defendant/RespondentNo.5) Cjvil Revisjoii under Seetion 1 fS of the CiviSJ3r<x:edyre^^iB^^ Present ;:;:' •• .. •'/•r.;-'.,^^^^ .':. ^ -;-/i'T;',. -z:-;:-' -:..' ' :':':-;:;-^:::1;-^ Shri Rakesh Paridey^ courisel for theapplicants. y^ ;y ShriAkhjI Agrawal,jPanel LawyerfortheState/respp ORALORDER , . (Passed pn 30" ofApnl,2008> Heard on admissjon. (2) Zh^^appiicants-areaggrsevedbyanofderdN^^ ^^^^:-: ^g^^g^v^ ';.-;.-;-:• theAdditional DistrictJudge,;K^ ^^':.':"" . '.„ '.. ''. :.:-'^ ^'^i£^^^ deiay in fiting the appeai w^Kondoned.^^^^T^ ^ ..^^- •^. I! lyll 11:1 ,T 11-07-2005 preferfedCiviiAppeaI No.S-A^OOS, beingaggrieved bythejudgment and deoree dated 28-03-2005 passed by the Cjvil Judge Ciass iiKhairagarh in Civi! Suit No.S-A/2001. Anapplication underSection 5of, the Limitation Adwas fifed before the Additional District Judge, Khairagarh which shows that the appellanVplaintiff-Kanwa! Ram was suffering from Hepatitis 'B'. Two medical certificates were filed and the appeiJanVpiaintiff alsoiadduced orat evidence of Ashwani Kumar, A.W.2 and Beni Ram,A.W.3 besides his own testimony. The learned Additional District Judge, Khairagarh has by a well reasoneci order condonedthe deiay.NosuohiiiegalJtybrsnfirmityQrjurisdict^onaierrorisseen the jmpugned order as would justify any interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. ' (3) in the result, this revision being devoid of merit is dismissed at the stage of admission. l,A.No,1, an application for stay also stands dieposed of. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Turnane