MCsW-W‘Jg IN THE MADHYA PKADESH DMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL B NCH AT BHOPAL o O.A.N0. 4/1999. SM'I'. SUDHA SHRIVASTAVA, Marking as Assistant Teacher (Sangeet)G@vt. Girls Higher Secanéary Schebol , Shantinagar, RAIPUR<MP). Vs. RESPONDENTS . o 1- THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Depar ment @f Schaol Educatian, Val labh Bhawan , Mant ralaya , BHOPAL. 2— THE DIRECTOR Dlrecterafe of Public instructlmxs Near Chetak Brld ge Gau‘tam Nagar, BHOPAL . Publlc Insutructiong , Ralpur Dlvn. RAxPUR(wP). APPLICATION UNDER SECI‘ICN 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIvg TRIBUNALS ACT , 1985 . AP PLI CANT Through 1ts Secret ary 3- THE. ¢OINT DIhECI‘OR, A W \e‘xb g3 mamm amméarm mmmmésr WW§wm aiwmw SB: Hon’ble Shri Manlndra Mohan Shivastava, J. 22.01.2010 - When the matter wa called for hean‘ng, nous appealed for the petitioner arid the matt r was passed over. Even in the second round, none appears for th petitioner. Shxi Axvind Dubey, P el Lawyer for the State] respondents. $ -, Return filed by the re pondents shows that all the grievances raised by the petitioner in e instant petition have been redressed and therefore the instant p tition is 'diSposed of with liberty to the " petitioner to revive the peti on if cause of action still survives. Sinha A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner: /// a / sé" em 'waSw‘qa w““‘°‘ws:é%e / 4 WWT-a; Lmtgiglzngr... Q1120 mam (W) / \