IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4950 of 2010 Between: K. Satyanarayana .. Petitioner AND Gummala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana & another .. Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4950 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri M.M.M. Srinivas, learned counsel representing Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao, learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 2. Learned counsel submitted that subsequent to the passing of the order of interim stay of confirmation of sale subject to deposit of 50% of decree debt including interest and costs as on the date of deposit within four weeks on 09.11.2010, no deposit has been made in compliance and hence, the interim stay granted therein stood vacated. Though personal notice of the second respondent was served, none entered appearance for the second respondent/judgment debtor No.1. Though notice of the first respondent is not yet returned personally served, the learned counsel submitted that their information is that the wife of the revision petitioner filed a claim petition in respect of item No.2 of the execution petition schedule property in E.A.No.217 of 2009 which is pending before the Executing Court and consequently, this revision questioning the issuance of sale notice to the revision petitioner is no longer necessary. 3. Accordingly, in the light of the submissions of the learned counsel, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as unnecessary. No costs. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 18th February, 2011 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4950 of 2010 Date: 18th February, 2011 KL