IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.257 of 2009 Between: 1 M.Koti Reddy S/o.Narsi Reddy R/o.Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 2 Kamatam Subba Reddy S/o.Rosi Reddy R/o.Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 3 Sareddy Venkateswar Reddy S/o.Mahananda R/o. Perambattulavaripalem Village, Kurichedu Mandal, Prakasam District. 4 Sarangi Mastanaiah S/o.Bala Kotaiah R/o.Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 Sambampati Samuel S/o.Devadanam R/o.Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The A.P. State Financial Corporation, rep. by its Branch Manager, 2nd Lane, Bhagyanagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 Mallisetti Nageswara Rao S/o.Venkaiah R/o.Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Notification published by the 1st respondent Corporation is Saakshi Telugu Daily Newspaper dt. 23.10.2008 inviting sealed tenders-cum-bids in respect of properties shown at item Nos.1 and 3 i.e. land admeasuring Ac. 4-56 cents in Sy.No.24/2, land admeasuring Ac. 2-46 cents situated in Sy.No. 99/1 and land admeasuring Ac.2-17 cents in Sy.No.130/2 of Kurichedu Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently set aside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. K.ARUNA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.S.RAMCHANDRA RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.257 OF 2009 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 27th January, 2009 IBL/MSV