IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CH HATFISGARH WRIT PETITION No. Q? 9f GK or: 2mm \ ‘5’ PETITION ER Versus Laxminarayan Patel, aged about 41 years, S/o Nanhurma Patel, presently posted and working as Assistant Teacher, Government Primry School, Chantipali, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya,Raipur (Chhattisgarh) District Officer, Raigarh i. .. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA o‘l‘ga 2. Director, Public Directorate,Raipur v‘/% @:2\%v\‘\ -§lV \G‘ xb\\5l’\. \ 3. Collector, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Raigarh, Q. y W oi; .. 4. District Education Raigarh, District (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE 2E8-2064 . On a mention being made, this case is taken up. Petitioner/s by Shn' H ”£~ $5M /A"N‘ DyrG‘Aw ancl Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shn V Hsard. The matter relates to transfer of the petitiener from the respective place. Counsel for the petitioner/s aubmi Xed that the transfer of the petitioner/s has been effected‘illegally in éontravention of law aid policy. State covnsel opposed it. ons, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Comt, ends ofjustice will be served if a direction is given to the petitioner/s to make detailed representation raising hiS/her gn'evancas and gounds before the State Govermneht/competent authority of the respondentsalong with a copy of the petit on and this order, Within 10 days, and on such representation being filed, the State Gover went/competent authority of the respondents, under the law, shall consider and decide the same on its otm‘ merits in accordance with laiv as early % possible preferably Within six wééks from the date of receipt/production ~of State by Shri V.V.S. Multny, Dy'. Advocate General: with Shn' Satish Gupta: Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers. Having heard. and considered the rival contenti at“ any grievance of the petitioner/s remains: law. With the aforesaid observations, th s petition stands disposed of. stands disposed of. Li”: Copy to State counsel for complianlce. “ Consequently MrWPw if any, also Certified copy as per rules. , /"/ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge on of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice. the same be considered on its own rierits, Counsel for the petitioner/s prays that after the decision of the representation if he:’she may be allowed td avail the remedy available under the law. It is open to the pe :itioner to avail the remedy available under the [ea era—a