IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11242 of 2003 JATESHWAR PURI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 24.9.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was initially appointed as Seasonal (Revenue) Collector in the year 1961. Thereafter his services were regularized in the year 1993 and he finally retired on 31.10.1996. He submits that all the retirement benefits have been paid to the petitioner by calculating his actual service with the respondents. As per their calculation which has come 12 years and 9 months approximately. He submits that as per his instruction the petitioner has actually worked with the respondents for the period much more than that. Therefore, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to verify his records and on the basis of material available with him, he may be allowed to file a representation along with the evidence for adding that period also towards his service period for calculating all payment of retrial benefits. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the authority concerned with necessary proof of his actual working with them. After considering the representation and going through the proof produced by the petitioner, if the authorities come to a conclusion that the petitioner is entitled for counting of his service for some more period, they shall pass consequential orders for revision of the retrial benefit on that count and all consequential payments shall be made to him as expeditiously as possible. Md.S. (J.N.Singh,J.) - 2 -