1 2367.99-wp+ bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2367 OF 1999 WITH APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2261 OF 1999 Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Gopal Krishna Sengupta ..Respondent WITH MISCELLANE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.592 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2367 OF 1999 WITH APPLICATION NO.2129 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1439 OF 2001 Gopal Krishna Sengupta .. Applicants Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Smt.A.A.Mane, APP for State. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 2, 2011 PC. Counsel absent. On 22nd February, 2002 a statement was made by Mr.Mogre, that the petitioner has moved Advocate General for taking appropriate steps against respondent No.1 under the provisions of Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971 and consequently the matter was removed from the Board. Nothing is informed as to what has happened in the action initiated 2 2367.99-wp+ by the petitioner. Since alternate efficacious remedy is resorted to, and the Division Bench, on 23rd September, 2002 in Miscellaneous Application No.51/2002 has recorded not to proceed with criminal case instituted by respondent Gopal Krishna Sengupta & Ors. against the Company, its Directors, Executives, Law Officers, Advocates, Counsel, Share Brokers etc. without previous leave of the Court and the proceedings are stayed till disposal of said Miscellaneous Application No.51/2002. I do not see any reason to further continue with the present prosecution initiated by the petitioners. Petitions accordingly dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.)