|lND[A^ RU@SJ,t\^_^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE :CHHATTISGARH:BILASFUR FIRST APPEAL (M) N0 : -^S 2011 .3 ° SC"'! APPELLANT APFLICANT ^ / \\ ^ o ^Vunal Kiunar Srivas aged 35 yrs, s/o Shri Anand Ram Srivas r/o Near Dudhadhari Mandir Mathpara, Raipur, Distt-Raipur CG -VERSUS- RESPONDENT J3EFENDANT imt Vmita Srivas aged 27 yrs, w/o Shri Vimal Kiunar Srivas r/o : Shri Radheshyam Srivas Rajwade Sadan, Banaras Road Ainbikapur, Distt-Slu-guja CG APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1984 •^ff'^-^^Sy ^*-. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR. G. MINHAJUDDIN. JJ. First Appeal (M) No. 25/2011 Vimal Kumar Srivas Appeilant Applicant Respondent Defendant Vs Smt. Vinita Srivas h ^ Present: Mr. AD Shrivastava, counsel for the appellant. Mr. JSP Chandrasen, counsel forttie respondent. ORDER (Oral) (1stDecember,2011) Per I.M. Quddusi, J; Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have arrived at a compromise outside the Court and the compromise deed has been filed along with application IA No.02 i.e. application for taking the compromise deed on record. Therefore, on this ground, he has filed an application IA No.04 for withdrawal ofthis appeal. In view ofthe above submission, the application IA No.04 is allowed and consequently, th^^ppeqj is dismissed as withdrawn^ Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge "^ -II '^^^