C.R. No. 6946 of 2008 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 6946 of 2008 Date of Decision: August 19, 2009 Ishwar Singh and another …..Petitioners Vs. Vinod Kumar and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Ashish Yadav, Advocate for the respondents. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Defendants have filed this appeal against the order dated December 21, 2006 passed by Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Rewari, and order dated November 26, 2008 passed by Additional District Judge, Rewari, allowing the application of the plaintiff- respondent for interim injunction restraining the defendant- petitioners from making any interference in the property in dispute by allowing the application under C.R. No. 6946 of 2008 [2] Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff- respondents. Plaintiff- respondents have claimed that they are owners in possession of 6 marlas of land which is mentioned in heading of the plaint on account of a registered sale deed dated November 15, 2006 whereas the defendants claim that the sale deed dated November 15, 2006 based on another sale deed dated April 8, 1988 and that the property claimed by the plaintiffs is different and the boundaries of the property in dispute have not been correctly depicted. I have gone through the orders passed by the Courts below and seen the site plan of the subject matter of the dispute. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to certain photographs to contend that certain constructions have been raised illegally during the pendency of the suit of the plaintiff- respondents in the garb of interim injunction but prima facie counsel for the petitioners has not been able to indicate that the sale deed dated November 15, 2006, for any reason is illegal except for raising doubt regarding the boundaries. In the interest of justice, without interfering in the orders passed by the Courts below, it is deemed appropriate to issue a direction to the trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the suit preferably within a period of 10 months after the receipt of a certified copy of this order by giving short adjournments. The revision petition is dismissed with the abovesaid direction. August 19, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE C.R. No. 6946 of 2008 [3]