@@ $£§§§§E $W$§i BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. 1S) No. éAd l 2011 / Petitioners : 1. Santosh Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Late Purshottam Lal, Aged about 26 years, Presently R/o Ward No. 19, Khadpadi Para, Kera Road, Dlstrlct . . JanJglrq(C.C¥.) . .CWW‘ " Respondents Versus South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Through its Chairmen cum managing director , Having its Registered Office at Seepat Road, P.B. No. 60, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) /o’ 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, \Qwq State Rehabilitation Department, D.K.S. .Bhawan, Mantralaya, District — Raipur (C.G.) c 3. The Deputy Collector, District- Korba, ,,(C.G.) 4. Sub—Divisional Magistrate, Katghora, District — Korba, (C.G.) WRIT RETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i @7 mmvfémm $sifdnaflé?!’ SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker 21.10.2011: Shri Vivek Sharma counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur Dy. AG for res Shri Pravin Das advocate wh< appear in this case also on behalf of re: Counsel for the petitioner sub issuance of direction to respondent petitioner seeking empioyment _in/ lieu land of his father was acquired by rest not been given employment though his 1.10.2010. Counsel for the SECL submits and decided strictly in accordance with if not already decided. Petition is thus disposed of wil pending application of the petitioner at with law. WWW (WW) pondents 2 to 4. )vnormally appears for the SECL is directed to spondent No.1. nits that a limited prayer of the petitioner is for \lo.1 to decide the pending applications of the 3f acquisition of land. According to the petitioner, iondent No.1 in the year 1986 but till date he has case has been recommended by the Collector on that case of the petitioner would be considered law and on the basis of the policies of the SECL, :h a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the s expeditiously as possible strictly in accordance Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge