IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 33710 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.11.2010 ... Paramjit Singh (minor) through his mother ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab Sh. Tarunveer Vashisht, Advocate for the complainant ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner by alluring 3 year old boy has committed unnatural sexual intercourse with him. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a juvenile. As per medical report, there is no evidence of unnatural act. So, the petitioner is entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. I have considered the said submission, but do not find any force in that submission. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of anticipatory bail. The fact whether the petitioner is a juvenile or not, could be determined by the Juvenile Court. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 29.11.2010 Judge chugh