IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43061 of 2010 SMT. MUNNI AGRAWAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant was an old employee of the accused persons with respect to the business of sale of battery. It is also alleged that the accused persons kept 2% of sale with themselves for several months and paid only Rs.3,000.00 per month to the complainant for shop expenditure, but when finally the complainant asked the accused persons to return the said amount for the marriage of his daughter, they refused. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that the entire allegation is absolutely false and frivolous. It is also submitted that there was no partnership between the complainant and the accused persons with respect thereto. He further states that the complaint has been filed only to coerce the petitioner to pay the alleged amount to the complainant, although there is absolutely no material to support the claim of the complainant. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this - 2 - order in the court below, petitioner, namely Smt. Munni Agrawal shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of likewise amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Vivek Bhardawaj, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Complaint Case No.2429C/2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)