// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No.638/2009 {Smt. Kamla Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Another} Date of Order :: 8th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Niranjan Singh, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for petitioner. This petition, on behalf of wife petitioner, is directed against the order dated 5th February, 2009, passed by the Sessions Judge, Jalore, whereby the revision of the petitioner was allowed and the amount of maintenance of Rs.500/-, awarded by the trial court under Section 125, Cr.P.C., was increased to Rs.1000/- per month. Being aggrieved with the same, the present petition has been preferred for enhancement of the amount of maintenance. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the trial court and the revisional court both misread the statement of PW-1 Smt. Kamla and committed an error in less // 2 // awarding/enhancing the amount of maintenance. It is contended that she demanded Rs.2500/- per month, therefore, both the orders are liable to be quashed by this Court. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. During the course of arguments, he also referred the statement of PW-1 Smt. Kamla, who, in her examination-in-chief, specifically stated that in case a sum of Rs.1000/- per month is awarded for her maintenance then it will be appropriate. It appears that the judgment passed by the Sessions Judge is based on the statement of PW-1 Smt. Kamla herself and, in these circumstances, I do not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the Sessions Judge; even otherwise there is no abuse of process of law so as to interfere with the impugned order under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. I do not find any merit in this petition. Consequently the criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //Jaiman//