^i^ CtliS'* cy ' ^T^ IN THE HON'BLEJIIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH ^T BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 5^/^^ /2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS z^ ••''Q'y . '^/ ff' ,^fe-"" ^ ^/ /: Jeevrakhan Lal Patel S/o. Shri Shiv Prasad Patel Aged about 61 years, R/o. Ward No. 7, College Road, Dongargaon, Distt.- Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) VERSUS , 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) ^3. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^-4. Treasury Officer, Rajnandgaon, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ".<<t'~ y HIGH CQURTOP^HH.ATTISGARH: BILASPUR WrUPetiypntSLNp. 5476 of 2009 PetiUoner Jeevrakhan Lal Patel -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition uiider Ardctes 226 offhe Constitution oflndia) Sin^e Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Aguihotri, J. Shri Soinkant Venua, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. O^RD^ERtorall (Passed on this 24 day of September, 2009) Heard. ' 1. This case pertaias to grievance of non-grant of retiral dues/pension. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on • ni'-uiuti.;'!-, ;?,.braits that the u^d'sr inay be referred to the pension coinniittee. 2. This Coi l, in the matter ofW.P.No.4642/2004 (Baynath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected raatters, directed the Com.inittee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were iavolved. The Coiamittee was constituted by fhe State Govemm.ent, pursuant to fhe order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Goverrunent of CUfciattisgarh and others), and order dated 13.3.2008 passed ia M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh aad others Vs. Baijnath Maudal aud anofher). Thus, fhis petition is squarely covered by tbe judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 passed m W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijiiafh Mandal (supra) as submitted by learaed counsel appearuig for the parties. 4. TIris petition is accordmgly disposed ofin the same terms i.e., the office of fhe Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Coininittee, withia a period of 15 days from fhe date of receipt of a copy of this order as weU as a copy of the petition fix>m the ....'SS^^SE.L^ ^' .'^as^& /•^••'St. B ^^sS^S^^ ^ 'tfc,, •at-»'" rst^»^f' -''-T:.'s'<--^7t'^' 5. ^L. petitioner. Thereafter, fhe CoiDinittee shaU issue notice to fhe petitioner and ofScers conceraed within a further period of 15 days. The Coxaiiuttee shaU consider and pass order, in accordaace wifh law, after affordjng propcr opportunity of hearuig to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerued saay file additional docuinents, ifnecessaiy. The entire exercise, iacluding payinent of retiral dues, if auy, to the petitioner, be coinpleted withia a period of four inonths froni fhe date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaU supply one coinplete set of the petitiou to fhe State counsel for transfemng fhe saoie to the Coiitmittee. TbatoiT Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge