HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITON No. 1638 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.508 of 2008 in the Court of the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the petitioner for eviction from the premises and recovery of arrears of rent. The trial of the suit commenced. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.No.1668 of 2009 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC with a prayer to reject the plaint. The ground pleaded by the petitioner is that the respondent was staying in United States when the suit was filed; and the general power of attorney executed by him is defective. The plea was elaborated by making reference to the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act and other provisions of law. Through its order dated 12.03.2010, the trial Court dismissed the I.A. Hence this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. The rejection of a plaint by the Court, either on its accord or at the instance of the defendant results in serious consequences, viz. denial very entry to the plaintiff into the Court. Such a step can be taken only when specific grounds on which the plaint is rejected fit into those mentioned under Rule 11 of Order VII CPC. In the instant case, the petitioner pointed out certain defects in the general power of attorney through whom the suit was filed. Even assuming that the general power of attorney suffered from any defect, it is a matter to be tried after recording evidence. If the defect is serious enough, the petitioner can insist on framing of an issue touching the same. It cannot be a ground constitute for rejecting the plaint. The trial Court has taken a correct view. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:30-06-2010 Note:Furnish copy within three days bo usd