IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1273 of 2009 NARESH RAI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----with----- Cr.Misc. No.262 of 2009 1. SATAI ROY 2. Pankaj Roy 3. Mostt. Munni Devi 4. Dhrupati Devi 5. Prem Lal Yadav 6. Pappu Kumar Roy @ Pappu Roy 7. Kailash Roy Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 04.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Defence pleading is not found sufficient for acquitting innocence even for the bail, as according to the defence, petitioner no.3 was married to one Abhishek. Thereafter, she fell in love with the deceased which was being opposed by the family members of petitioner no.3. If that was the fact, how the deceased went there and family members allowed him to take petitioner no.3. Thereafter, the hanging is found in a premise where the deceased were acquainted with availability of the rope, so he asked the petitioner no.3 to stay at a distance and hanged himself, while the allegation is about killing by the arms. So, I find it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)