IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 29965 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 2.12.2011 Kulwant Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Ms. Gagan Deep Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion on 30.9.2011, the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed: |It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that on the bare reading of the FIR offences under Sections 376, 379 IPC are not made out against the petitioner nor is he in any manner associated with the same. He has been roped only on the ground that he had taken the lady back to his husband and this he has done on the request made by the husband of the complainant. He contends that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation and cooperate with the same.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI- Narinder Kumar, submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the stand of learned counsel for the State, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 30.9.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 2.12.2011/mk