IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12160 of 2009 1. SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE LAGANDEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAITIYA, P.S. SONEPUR, DISTRICT SARAN. 2. MEENA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE ABHIMANYA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FATCHPUR, P.S. SHAKUND, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR ---PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FINANCE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, REVENUE LAND REFORMS DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMEMT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR. 6. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, BHAGALPUR. 7. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ESTABLISHMENT, BHAGALPUR. 8. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, BHAGALPUR. 9. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 14.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are serving as Mohri in the Collectorate at Bhagalpur. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the Collector, Bhagalpur to consider their case for grant of Assured Career Progression benefit as other Mohris junior to them have already been granted such benefit and one such order is contained in Annexure-1 to this application, wherefrom it is evident that others who were junior to the petitioners are allowed such benefit. Highlighting the aforesaid grievance petitioners have represented before the Collector, Bhagalpur under representations dated 21.8.2006 and 12.8.2006, Annexures-2 and 2/A. 3. Let the Collector, Bhagalpur consider the two representation dated 21.8.2006 and 12.8.2006, Annexures-2 and 2/A in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case, within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In case, the Collector is not inclined to grant ACP benefit to the petitioner then she shall be well advised to pass appropriate orders indicating reasons as to why petitioners be not allowed the ACP benefit. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)