IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34841 of 2010 SANJEET SAH @ SATYAJEET SAH son of Rama Shankar Sah, resident of Mohalla-Bhagwanpur Chhatti Fardogola, P.S.-Sadar, Dist.-Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.3.2011. Heard Mr.Prabhakar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who apprehends his arrest in connection with Town P.S.Case No.378 of 2007 registered for the offence under sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. The petitioner’s name in the case has surfaced on the basis of confession of Pintu Kumar, who disclosed that he had purchased the stolen car from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and Pintu Kumar both were drivers and they were in inimical terms and the petitioner was apprehending that he may be falsely implicated by accused Pintu Kumar and, as such, as per the statement made in paragraph-9 of the petition, an informatory petition was filed on 5.7.2007 in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur on 5.7.2007. In the facts and circumstance of the present case, the court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for extending privilege of anticipatory bail. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of one 2 month from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P.S. Case No.378 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)