CW 13775/09 { 1 } In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.13775/2009 Ramesh Chand Yadav Versus RSRTC & Ors Date of Order ::: 05/11//09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Manoj Kr Madhani, for petitioner Counsel submits that petitioner was supplied/served with inquiry reports of four charge sheets, followed by show cause notice dt.28/10/09 (Ann.4) seeking his explanation and asking him to appear for personal hearing. Basic bone of contention urged by Counsel is that reasonable opportunity of hearing has not been afforded to him to submit his explanation while serving him notice dt.28/10/09 (Ann.4). Counsel further suhmits that apart from inquiry report, other material including statements recorded in course of disciplinary inquiry were also demanded by him through his application/representations (Ann.2 & 3) which made him unable in submitting reply to the notice served. It appears from the record that copy of inquiry reports in regard to four charge sheets was served upon petitioner alongwith notice dt.06/10/09 (Ann.1) and as per his own saying, report of inquiry was served upon him CW 13775/09 { 2 } on 09/10/09 and was called upon to submit his written explanation pursuant to notice dt. 06/10/09 (Ann.1); since he failed to submit his written explanation, he was given last opportunity vide notice dt.28/10/09 (Ann.4) to do so and also to appear in person for hearing, if advised. As regards copy of inquiry report, it has already been served upon petitioner and in regard to statements recorded in course of inquiry, if not served and caused prejudice to him, which can always be raised in reply to notice served (Ann.1) accompanied with report of inquiry and which will certainly be examined by disciplinary authority while taking final decision in accordance with disciplinary rules. However, at this stage, this Court finds no justification to interfere U/Art.226 of the Constitution, while final decision has yet to be taken by disciplinary authority. Consequently, writ petition is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 13775CW09Nov5-DsDE.doc