IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL In Writ Petition No. 1080 of 2010 (M/S) Sanjeev Lal S/o Late Captain Chaman Lal R/o F-3 Meedo Plaza Rajpur Road Dehradun District Dehradun. ……Petitioner Versus 1. Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority Dehradun through its Secretary, 12 Preetam Road Dehradun. 2. Vice Chairman Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority Dehradun, 12 Preetam Road Dehradun. …….Respondents. Mr. M.S.Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rahul Consul, Advocate for the respondents. Dated:-30-06-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel of the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 15.05.2010 annexed as annexure No.5 to the writ petition passed by the respondents. The impugned order is only the show cause notice. The petitioner has also filed objections on 20.05.2010 against the show cause notice annexed as annexure no.6 to the writ petition. Objections has already been filed by the petitioner before the Vice Chairman, Mussorie Dehradun Development Authority Dehradun, which is still pending. There is no ground in the writ petition that the authority who issue the show cause notice is competent to issue show cause notice. The writ petition is not maintainable against show cause notice. 2 The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authority stopped the construction work of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the respondents shall decide the objections of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 30-06-2010 JM