BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twentieth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13910 of 2011 1. JEYABAL 2. DHANALAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.8 & 9 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THATHAINGARPET POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO.167 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 366(A) IPC in Crime No.167 of 2011, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the victim girl, who is hardly aged 15 years, was kidnapped and she was married to the son of the second petitioner by name Mr.Anand. The said marriage had been solemnised in violation of the Prohibition of Child Marriages Act 2006, which is an offence under Section 9 of the said Act, which is cognizable and non bailable. Apart from that if the boy had sexual intercourse with the girl, which makes an another offence of rape. Apart from that the earlier petition filed by the petitioners in Crl.OP.(MD) No.11982 of 2011 was dismissed by this Court on 14.09.2011. In such view of the matter, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. sd/- 20/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATHAINGARPET POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. SR : 29.10.2011 : 1P/3C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13910 of 2011 Date :20/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/