'SS^^sf..f^S^^S^ ^' HIGHCOURTOPCNHAmseARHATBttAa'UR Writ PetKion fst No. 36 of208f Pefitioner S.R. Sahu Sfo Lats Shri Banshi Lal Sahu, aged atuut 50 yeare, occupafion serviee, Poated as Personal Assi^ant at Forerf Dwfeion Ratgarh, Tahdl and EMstrict Rsugah (CG) Versus Respondents 1) The State of Chhattfegarti, thtough ttre Secretaiy, Fcwest Departmeni, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan. Rawur 2) The Upper Seeretary. Forret Department, Chhatb'sgarh, DKS Building, Raipur (CG) 3) Shri K.K. Anand, Pereonrt Assistant^enior Personal Assi^ant, Forest t^ision Dharamjaigartt District Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETiTSON UNDER ARTICLE 226027 OF THE CONSTiTUTIOM OF 1NDIA SB: Hon'ble.JusticeShri Satish K. Agnlhotri Presenfc Mr. Prashant JayErewal, 8r. Adweatewith Mr. Sanlolp Jayasweil, counsel for the petitkmef. Mre. AnjuAhuja, Dy. Govt. Ach/OGatelwtherespondenW^ste. ORDER ^ (Passed on this ielhdayofApril. 2007) 1. The petltioner has flled thts pett'on chatlenging ttis bansferoKters dated 6-7-2006 (Ann®(ureP/3)& 7-7-2006 (Annemre W^. By virtue tf the interim order dated 4-10.2006, passed l^ tbis Court, the petiConer is continuing at the original place of posUng. 2. Be that as^tt may, orffli the passage cfttme ftte petftton has become infructuous, as period <rf transfer fe not applicN)teforew. At this point of flme there is no question to examlne tte valkiify of the hansfer order. However, the respondent is at Mberfy to pass appropriate orders, keepng in view Ihe public intere^ and administrative exlgency, without insf^ing on compliance crf the impugned transfer oKters./ • , ^ 3. In vlew of ttie above, this |»tiBonstands dtepo^d of. No onter as tocods. f R^u Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge S®il