j- c^ BEFORE THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIseARH ATBILASPUR (C.6.) W.P. (S} N0. (^^<S7- of 2010 PETITTONER RESPOJMDENTS ?/<^. ^yy ^yy/y /< ^^' ^•\J. y-, •^ ^ ./. ;y -°p'~ /" .\^^ "'' £^^<'te.jj; •^L ^// ^^s.^^/ ir. Ram Krishna Pandey, Son of late Shri Pt. L.P. Pandey, aged about 69 years, R/o. Near Karma Chowk, fianpati Nagar, New Changora, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1.. 2, ^^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariate, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (,C.G.) The Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Through the Registrar, Rauipur (C.&.} The 1-fead of the Department, (H,O.D.), School of Studies In law, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE C'ONSTITU'TTON OF IN&IA PARTCCULARSOF THE PETETEONER As meritioned in the cause title. ~3;sr-<fi<<id<<,®Ti).H'iiB, fsidi-y^-s. ..kt:..B...Lt?.>....M?:....6.6^2j<5 ?T'q^T( an^rwi^ifw ^T-sn^r'g^Nr <ftl*ifCTeil'T TTW?ff "^f fe^ <^^R ^affinsn^r • ur*w»K¥»orc* IUTO -TT'F<a'ytT/<ic* »id>rTt¥iuu"EMOT^tnrAirspi 30.11.aoio Shri Saiueer Behar, counsl •l for ffae petitioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, y.L. for the State. Counsel for tlie petitioBier subinits that he niav be permitted to withdraw fhis petition with liberty to pursue his pending reprcsentations da.te|d 14.9.2010 & 21.10.2010 (Aanexures P/2 & P/3). He how^ver, subiaits that direction niay be issued to tbe aufhority concemed for deciding his rep.resea.tation. Couusel for the State subtnits fhat he Iias nootojection if the pending representation of f4e petitioner is beuig decided by ttie aufhoritv concemed ia accosidance wifh law. Frotn the petition, it is cl^ar fhat fhe Vice ChanceUor to wli.oia the representation has b as a party. Be that as it inay, fhe petjtioner would be at liberty to file fresh icpresentation before res^ expected that fhe same would law. It is niade clear fhat thi opiaion on merits of the case) would be at Mberty to dec.ide| accordaace with ]aw consideringl ;en inade has not beea an-aved )ondent N0.2 aud ia tum it is Ibe decided in acconlance wiffa Court has not expressed aay and the aufhority concemed the representation strictty ia alt fhe aspect oftlie case. c^y^s y^s^