CR No. 6762 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6762 of 2010 Date of decision: October 14, 2010 Paramjit Kaur and another ...Petitioners Versus Tej Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. KS Jawandah, Advocate, for the petitioners. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. The petitioners/plaintiffs have preferred this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the order dated 6.9.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurdaspur, closing their evidence by order. It is a case where several opportunities were granted to the petitioners to produce their evidence. No doubt, a perusal of the proceeding orders, re-produced in the grounds of revision, reveals that initially the witnesses examined by them were not cross-examined by the other side on the objection taken by them regarding the piece meal recording of the evidence. The examination-in-chief of those witnesses was completed on 12.10.2009 and thereafter they were to be produced by the plaintiff for their cross-examination. On 28.7.2010 an adjournment was granted to the plaintiffs for producing their evidence, subject to the payment of costs. On the next date their evidence was closed by order. Several opportunities were granted to the plaintiffs to produce their evidence and it CR No. 6762 of 2010 2 was only thereafter their evidence was closed by order. No ground is made out for interference in the impugned order of the trial court, which was passed after granting so many opportunities to the petitioners. The revision petition is dismissed accordingly. October 14, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE