IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the June 09th, 2006 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.491 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Indra Pal S/o Natthu Singh R/o village Sampatpur, Anandpur P.S. Rudrapur, District U. S. Nagar ….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ….. Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No.896 of 2006 Under Section 304B, 201 IPC P.S. Rudrapur District U. S. Nagar _______________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri S. K. Mandal learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. It was contended that the present applicant was not residing in the house where the deceased and her in-laws were residing. It was contended that the averments made in the FIR as well as in the statement are vague. It was further contended that the wife of the complainant has stated that when they went to the house of the in-laws of the deceased, the present applicant-Indra Pal has demanded a motor-cycle and dowry. It was further contended that the said averment does not find place in the FIR. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (J. C. S. Rawat, J.) Dated 09.06.2006 LSR