:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 441 OF NO. 441 OF NO. 441 OF 1988 1988 1988 Rusi Munchersha Toddyal. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Smt. Radha Burnier & Ors. ... Defendants. None for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 27TH 27TH 27TH JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . This matter was placed before the Court on 28th August 2008 and the Plaintiff’s Advocate sought time on that day. He had come without copies of the pleadings. Office was directed to supply copies of pleadings to the Plaintiff’s Advocate and the matter was adjourned for four weeks. 2. None is appearing after the matter has appeared before me. 3. It is in such circumstances and when the order passed on 28th August 2008 clearly records that the Suit will be dismissed for want of prosecution, that there is no alternative but to dismiss the Suit for want of prosecution. The Suit is accordingly dismissed. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)