IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 09-02-2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.1893 and 1894 of 2011 M.P.Nos.1 + 1 of 2011 The Presidency Club, Rep. By its Honorary Secretary, P.Chander, Fair Lawns, 51, Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai-8. .. Petitioner in both the writ petitions Versus 1.The Entertainment Tax Officer, Egmore-I Assessment Circle Spurtank Road, Chetpet, Chennai-600 002. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Zone IV, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai (Central) Division, PAPJM Buildings, IV Floor, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. .. Respondents in both the writ petitions Prayer in W.P.No.1893 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the third respondent in M.P.No.1 of 2010, dated 15.11.2010 directed against the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No.404/TNET/2006- 07, dated 27.11.2009, and to quash the same, and direct him to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner on merits. Prayer in W.P.No.1894 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the third respondent in M.P.No.2 of 2010, dated 15.11.2010 directed against the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No.404/TNET/2007- 08, dated 27.11.2009, and to quash the same, and direct him to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner on merits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sriprakash For Respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan (AGP) (Taxes) COMMON ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petitions and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and in view of the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that he has no objection for condoning the delay of 176 days, in filing the revision petitions, before the third respondent, the said delay is condoned and the third respondent is directed to number the revision petitions in question and to decide the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the authorised representative of the petitioner club. The writ petitions are disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To 1.The Entertainment Tax Officer, Egmore-I Assessment Circle Spurtank Road, Chetpet, Chennai-600 002. 2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Zone IV, Chennai-600 006. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai (Central) Division, PAPJM Buildings, IV Floor, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 1 cc To The Spl.Government Pleader, SR.9952 2 cc To Mr.N.Inbarajan, Advocate, SR.9539 Writ Petition Nos.1893 and 1894 of 2011 la(co) pmk.14.3.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/