IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38886 of 2008 BAJRANGI KUMAR YADAV @ RAM BABU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner who is stated to be younger brother of the husband apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Penal Code. An FIR by the Chaukidar states that the deceased was killed by her father-in-law and buried in the backyard. That the relation between the deceased and her husband were not good and who had also taken Rs. One lac from her parents for learning Computer and wanted more money. The FIR makes no reference to the petitioner at all as even being present. It is his further defence that he was employed in a private firm M/s Arcon Engineers Pvt. Ltd. at New Delhi and was not even present in the village on the date of occurrence busy with his employment at New Delhi. Considering that the name of the petitioner does not find mention in the FIR, but that his name has merely been included in the last portion of the FIR as a family member, the plea of alibi, this Court considers it proper to direct, that let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till submission of chargesheet when this Court expects that in the nature of allegations the plea of alibi shall be appropriately investigated, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Darbhanga in Singhwara PS Case No. 81 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)