IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10324 of 2011 AZAD ALI & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 420 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner no.1, namely, Azad Ali, has already been arrested. Hence, his anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. So far petitioner no.2,namely, Quasim Ali is concerned, though he was not apprehended at the spot when the raid was made by the police at gambling place but it is alleged that motor cycle of the petitioner was found parked at the gambling place. The statement has been made in paragraph no.10 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of 2 accusation, let the petitioner no. 2, Quasim Ali, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Katihar Town (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 17 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)