IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2009 / 4TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 548 of 2009(U) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8207/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/FIRST RESPONDENT IN WPC: --------------------------------------------------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.VIJAYARAGHAVAN, S/O.KRISHNAN,MANAGER, IMPAL,NO.22 LAL GANGA MANSION, GURU NANAK MOTOR MARKET, MOUDHAPARA, RAIPUR 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,KAKKANAD. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P. No.548 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 8207 OF 2009 (U) ===================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2009 O R D E R Review petition is filed pointing out that there was an omission on the part of the counsel in not pointing out the pendency of MACA 841/06, filed by the KSRTC against the award in OP(MV) No.1573/91, the compensation of which was ordered to be paid as per the judgment in the writ petition. 2. However, it is now disclosed that apart from getting the appeal numbered and notice ordered in the petition for condoning the delay, neither has the appeal been admitted nor is the award stayed by this Court. 3. In view of this, I do not find any reason to review the judgment. Review petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp