n;n-~:* ® @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF C HATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NOW?! 2006 WRIT PETITION ( PETITIONER K . Ashok Kumar Shandilya S/o Shrl Ramadhar Shandilya, aged about 26 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Janpad—Panchyat Madanpur, Pali, District-Korba (C.G.’) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh 1 ‘ through Secretary Panchyat & Rural Development Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Korba ‘ Dist Korba (C.G.) The Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Katghora Tahsil—Pali Dist. KOrba (C.G.) Tahsildar Pali Tahsil Pali Dist. Korba (C.G.) ' Prabhu Ram Yadav Secretary Gram Panchyat Madanpur, Dist. Korba (C.G.) ‘l Hemlal Up-Sarpanch Gram Panchyat Madanpur, Janpad Panchyat-Pali Dist. Korba (C.G.) Ramdulare Kanwar, Panch of Ward No.7. Babulal, Panch of ward No.8 Santram Kanwar, Panch of ward No.3 ' Sumit kunwar, Panch of ward l No.l ”3a,.fmyk 7‘)')2vé' Smt. w Devi, Panch of ward No.6. Smt. Dhankunwar, Panch of ward No.2.‘ Ganesh Singh Kanwar, of ward No.16. Mohan Das, Panch of ward No.l8. Hinohha Ram, PanCh of ward No.ll. Sawant Singh, Panch of ward No.10. Kumari Laxmi Raj, Panch of ward No. l2. Smt. Sushila Bai. Wwrgi MR” K '/d Panch Panch of xw lba CpN/o‘o 2_._ :l8) . :19) Lambodar Das, Panch ofmward " 1% No.17, the .6 to 19 all resident of Gram Panchyat Madanpur, Janpad Panchyat Pali bist. Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/” OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI, MNDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERES: W No ‘\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. (C) No. 7171 of2006 SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. mihotri, J Shn' R. S. Patcl, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Utkamh Velma; Depuiy Govt. Advocate for the respondents No, 1 to 4. Thakur O R D E R ( Passed oh this 15th day of F‘ebmmy, 2M7) The following omer of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agihotri, J. 1. Leained counsel appealing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail statutoty remedy of appeal. In View of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn og with the aforestated liberty. 3. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the petitioner, retaining photocopy of the same, on record. i Sd/— . I 3 Satish K.Agnihotri ; ‘ Judge = Petitioner Ashak Kumar Respondents State. of Chhattisgarh