IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4411 of 2011 Ashwini Kumar Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 21.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Failure of the counsel to point out a law in his favour by virtue of which a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for his retention would surely not help the petitioner. No direction in this regard can be given by this Court. Admitted position is that the petitioner’s engagement was on contract for a period of 11 months and now the authority have opined that there is no work to utilise the service of the petitioner in the centre. They have decided to terminate him. Termination of contract will not come within the ambit of Article 226. If the petitioner feels that there is violation of contract he has remedy under the common law and not the writ jurisdiction. This writ application is dismissed with the above observation. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)