IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27677 of 2008 Between: S.Venkataiah S/o.Rachaiah R/o.H.No.1-9-252/10/F, Ramnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Potti Sriramulu Telugu University, rep. by its Registrar, Public Gardens, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularazing the services of the petitioner to the post of attender or attender-cum-cook on par with junior to that of the petitioner as the same is illegal and in violation of article 14, 16 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. the date of regularization of the juniors to that of the petitioners and pass such further other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent: MS.B.H.BHARATI DEVI The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by S.Venkataiah assailing the action of the respondents in not regularizing his services in the post of Attender-Cook on par with his juniors. The petitioner claims that he was appointed as Attender-Cook on 11.12.1989. He filed W.P.No.24271 of 1998. The said writ petition came to be disposed of directing the respondents to pay the pay-scale attached to the post of Attender-Cook. He is being paid minimum pay-scale attached to the post of Attender-Cook. It is the grievance of the petitioner that many of his juniors’ services have been regularized giving benefit of G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance & Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, dated 22.04.1994 and so far as the G.O. is concerned, but his claim is not considered. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that his case for regularization under G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994 is not being considered. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of his services as Attender-Cook, if he is eligible in accordance with guidelines issued under G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. _______________________ (B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J) Dt:19.01.2009 kdl