J W 1 _1mHuygggggwgguyl||||l I 4 1N Ta HIGH écURT OF MADHYA PRADEsH Air JABALP‘ ; f M.P,No. ~ 1991 wagw ggéwwgagjiigvl ‘ Q PETITIGNER : Santosh Vedeo HousevPrOpnieta Smt. Prafullabai W/o Shri Shankarrao kt ? Raate, R/o Khairagarh aged about Ward 53 No.7,’Khairagarh, years, District Rajnandgaon. x x -Ver SUS- 1. State of M.P¢ through COllector Rajnanégaon. h 2. S;D.O. Kpairagar. REONDENTS SP ‘ ONSTITUTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE C OF INDIA mnmw.» d k, ¥ ‘ J\# ‘ ; ,‘/ “ ”Jw M gym“. 14.3“? ak x n" r a PETITION XI—HC—22 Wm ~ nwyND‘QJL 5] m zoo 4[ Shri Sandeep Dubey, Gov Heard‘ When The maffer is caned, 5hri Ranbir Singh submifs fha‘r Ku‘ Cour‘l'. He fur'iher submh‘s fhai' she r bu'l' no reply has heen senf by fhe she prayed Tha‘l' no ins'rrucTioh and lr. ‘Vide order da'red 28-2-2065, 5.P.C. rhe Registry issued 5.P.C. on 5-3-2005 l5, Ku. Sharmila Singhai appeared and z Vakala'mama and fa seek ins'l'rucfion er on 25-6-2005 also, she appeared. ia‘r pe‘fi’rioner is no? responding. s since The 5.P.C. has already been . pefi‘rioner is no? appearing, if appears s‘i'ed in pursuing The peTiTion. The inferim order gran‘re for- non-prosecu‘rion. Sdl- L.c.B.HADoo Judge ii} Singhai is busy in some o'rher fried To can’mcf ‘H’Ie pe'fi'rione pe‘rifioner, fherefor'e, she hac 5.P.C. be issued 1'0 'fhe pe‘rifione was directed 1'0 be issued and ' for 2—5-2005. 0n 2” May 20c prayed for 15days‘ fime 1’0 fiii from ‘H'Ie pe‘ri‘i'ioner. Thereaf'f Now a requesi’ has been made “H Under The circums'rance issued 1'0 fhe pe'ri‘i'ioner :ind The Thai“ ihe petitioner is nof infere The pefifion is dismissed 1’. Adv. for The Sink" I d earlier is vaca‘fed. (sew) m I mm‘ mm wxiasw ‘ m.ma1%a WW§WW égwm ‘*~ 10-8—2005 Shri Ronbir' Singh, Advocm‘e appears on behalf of Ku. Sharmila Singhai, for The pe'l’i‘l'ioner'.