wp7437.08 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7437 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.S.R. Sapkal Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Sapkal Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.R.P. Phatake, A.G.P. for Resp. No.1. Shri.S.T. Shelke Advocate for Resp. Nos. 2 and 3. Shri.S.V. Suryawanshi Advocate h/f. Shri. P.B. Shirsath Advocate for Resp. No.4. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2010. 1. The Petitioner claiming to be a voter, has challenged the election of Respondent No.4. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that total votes polled were 1327 but later on the same were detected to be 1312 only. There was defect in the electronic voting machine. wp7437.08 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2. The Respondent No.3 filed affidavit in reply. We have perused the same. There is an alternate remedy to challenge the election of a elected candidate. Even otherwise, the issue raised in this Petition cannot be gone into, in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is dismissed. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J.] [NARESH H.PATIL,J.] asb/DEC10/wp7437.08