C.R. No.5329 of 2011 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5329 of 2011 Date of decision: September 2, 2011. Harjeet Singh ... Petitioner v. Palla Singh @ Kirpal Singh & Ors. ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 29.8.2011 passed by the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Giddarbaha whereby she had closed the evidence of the plaintiff on the ground that the plaintiff, having availed numerous opportunities, has failed to conclude his evidence. Shri Surinder Garg, Counsel appearing for the petitioner- plaintiff, has stated that the plaintiff intends to examine four witnesses, i.e., plaintiff himself, Deed Writer – Gulshan Kumar Manchanda, Vikramjit Singh and Mukhtiar Singh, attesting witnesses of the Will. Counsel states that the entire evidence shall be produced by the plaintiff at his own risk and responsibility on one date. Therefore, the Counsel prays that one effective opportunity be granted for examination of the plaintiff's evidence. In view of the aforesaid prayer made by Counsel for the C.R. No.5329 of 2011 -: 2 :- petitioner, the present revision petition is accepted. It is ordered that the trial court shall afford one effective opportunity for recording evidence of the above stated four witnesses. Since the petitioner has caused delay in culmination of the proceedings, he is saddled with costs of Rs.5,000/-. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] September 2, 2011. Judge kadyan