IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9927 of 2009 TARIQU MAHMOOD @ CHAND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 9.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A loaded pistol has been shown recovered from the petitioner’s possession which is doubted on the ground that the petitioner was taken from his house without any cause, apprehending otherwise for a complaint was filed on behalf of petitioner’s father against the police then only showing ante dated recovery this case is lodged and the petitioner is in custody since 14.12.2008. Custody of the petitioner would be taken for a liberal view but his act that filing of the complaint by his father against the police makes the matter serious that also on the basis of the complaint. The petitioner if so taken and kept in custody of the police as per allegation of petitioner’s father was within the two or three days of the recovery and more skill is applied, thus I find it not a fit case for bail. Prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI