IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CM No. 16116 of 2011 in CWP No. 20422 of 2011 Date of decision November 30, 2011 Amanpreet Singh ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. G. S. Tangrali, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). CM No. 16116 of 2011 C.M.is allowed. The writ petition is taken up for hearing immediately. CWP No. 20422 of 2011 The writ petition seeks for a mandamus directing the government to withdraw the security given to the third respondent. The petitioner's grievance is that the third respondent has several criminal cases pending against him. It shall be for the State to decide whether a person with so many criminal proceedings pending is entitled to security cover or not. The matter cannot be treated as one of the public interest, for the petitioner to convas. The writ petition is consequently dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 30, 2011 archana