1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10358 OF 2010 Vikas Premraj Suryawanshi .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.P. Tiwari, advocate holding for Mr. N.L. Choudhari, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Khandare, GP for the State. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE : 24 th NOVEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Petitioner claims that though he was selected against the permanent post in the year 2001, respondent no. 5 had issued appointment order only for the period till 30 th April, 2001 and the approval granted by the University was also for limited period. 2 Petitioner’s services were already terminated by the management. Not only that, being aggrieved by said termination order, he had also 2 preferred an appeal before the learned College Tribunal. The same is dismissed way back in 2004. 3 In this background, the claim of the petitioner that he should be granted re-instatement is without any merit hence rejected. Petition stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb/office/ wp10358.10.odt