IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2268 of 2009 1. PUTURBA DEVI @ PUTUKHA DEVI, D/o Ramjee Bind 2. SABITA DEVI @ BABITA DEVI, D/o Ramji Bind 3. RINKU DEVI, D/o Ramji Bind 4. GYANTI DEVI @ JANTI DEVI, D/o Ram Prit Bind. All are residents of Village – Korma, P.S. – Ghoshi, District – Jehanabad. ….. Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SMT. SONAMANTI DEVI, Wife of Rajesh Bind @ Bam Bind, resident of village – Korama, P.S. – Ghoshi, District – Jehanabad, at present village – Kela Bigha, P.S. – Telhara, District – Nalanda. …. Opp. Parties. With Cr.Misc. No.3254 of 2009 1. RAMJI BIND, S/o late Chamaru Bind 2. SHIV RANI DEVI, W/o Ramji Bind 3. RAMPRIT BIND @ BASUDEO PRASAD, S/o late Chamaru Bind 4. KARI DEVI, W/o Ramprit Bind @ Basudeo Prasad. All are residents of Village – Korma, P.S. – Ghoshi, District – Jehanabad. ….. Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SMT. SONAMANTI DEVI, Wife of Rajesh Bind @ Bam Bind, resident of village – Korama, P.S. – Ghoshi, District – Jehanabad, at present village – Kela Bigha, P.S. – Telhara, District – Nalanda. …. Opp. Parties. ----------- 04/ 30.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the O.P.No. 2. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a complaint case registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 307, 314/34 of the Penal Code. Counsel for the O.P. No. 2 states that she is not willing to resume the matrimonial relationship with the petitioner husband as he had assaulted her which led to termination of pregnancy, which fact is mentioned in the complaint petition and was also found true by the - 2 - Principal Judge. In view of aforesaid statement of O.P. No.2, I am not inclined to consider the prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail in the event of arrest. They are directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today. The case of the married Nanad of the complainant be considered by the court below with sympathy. DKS/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)