1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.3368/2009. : : Manish Kumar Rajwani Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. : : Date of Order 22.4.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. R. N. Mathur for the petitioner. Dr. Y. C. Sharma for the respondent-University. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed with grievance that respondents have not awarded correct marks to petitioner and prays that the respondents be directed to revise his marks upwards for their mistake in issuing admission card to him with a wrong roll number. 3. Shri R. N. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner was issued admit card with Roll No.2593 and when he went to examination hall he was told that another candidate with the same roll number was already there and in process to getting the 2 admission card corrected in which the petitioner was alloted Roll No.2523. In that process, his 35 minutes were lost and which adversely affected the merit of petitioner because he had to attempt the question paper in a hurried manner. It is, therefore, prayed that respondents be directed to compensate the petitioner by allowing bonus marks or conducting a special examination for him. 3. The respondents have clarified that merit of the petitioner was not at all affected by issuance of admit card with different roll number. That mistake was corrected in the examination hall itself and petitioner did not suffer adversely due to that because petitioner had attempted all 133 questions of Part-I of subject paper and has secured even higher marks than other papers in which he started examination on time. Learned counsel have clarified that in the normal course, a candidate is not permitted to take examination when he reaches the examination hall with delay of 15 minutes. Petitioner did not submit any representation to Center Superintendent. It is contended that the counseling for allotment of seat has already taken place but he could not succeed on merit. 3 4. In view of clarifications made by respondents especially that even as per revised merit, which was revised from Merit No.933 to 883, petitioner could not appear sufficiently high in the merit of PG examination and petitioner attempted all 133 questions, this writ petition is dismissed. The respondents cannot be required to hold a special examination for petitioner especially when examination was held on 15.2.2009 and writ petition was filed on 23.3.2009. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.S/4.