IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51567 of 2008 SIKANDAR MAHTO @ SIKENDAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that suspicion is only there leveled against the petitioner. He was working at Panjab but I find no substance in the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Circumstance prevailing in the case is sufficient to conclude that the petitioner’s involvement was there in killing the deceased. Further I find no substance in the submission that father in law will not kill his son in law. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI