HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS^RH AJ BIUtSPUR Writ Petition No.6147 of 2000 COftAM; Hon'ble Shri S.R. Noyak, CJ & Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshrnukh , J. Petitioner Smt. Ratnamala Meshram, W/o Vinoyak /SAeshram, Asstf. Professor (Zo»logy), ft/o F-2/11, New Civil Lines, burg (M.P.) Versus Respondents 1. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Throuflh Principal Secretary, beptt. Of Higher Education, Vallabh Bhavan], Bhopal (M.P.) 2. The Cbmmissio'ner, Higher Eduoatfon, 5a'fpuda Bhavart, Bhopal. 3. The Principat, 6ovt. 6irls Colle9e, &urg (W.P.) 4. M.-P.State Adiriinistrative . Tn'bunal, Jabalpur through its Registrar. A Shri V.&Tamaskar, Counsel with Shri P.P.Sahu, for the petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, Dy. (3o^t. Adyocate for respondents/State ORAL ORDER (Possed on 4th January 2006) The following oral order of the Court was pcissed by S.R.NAYAK, C.J. The first respondent in W.P.No.3874/2000 is the petitioner herein. In this writpetition, she has prayed for the follpwing reliefs: - (i) That theHon'blecourt nwybe pleased todirecl-the Respondent No.l fo 3 fo poy back wages from 15-11-1992 till the decisjonof this case. That, the Hon'ble' Court may be pleased tp clirect Re^aondent No.l to 3 to give seniority from 'tl'ie do'teofjoininginservice. i.. 1 '<-,' j :il ii i f> •?'N ;4^^1 (&K« •-8.- Ciii) That, tfie Hon'ble Court may be pleosed to direct tfte Respondent No.l to 3 to give increment, leave and otiier consequential benefits. 2. We have perused •the avermenl's in the writ petition particular averment in paragraph 3 of the writ petition. The above reliefs are sought essentkilly on the basis of •the judgment of the A\.P. State Administrative Tpibunal (for skort the Tribunal) dated 29.10.1999 in O.A.No.942/1993. 3. The aboye order of the Tribunal wo;s assailed by the State and its authorities in W.P.No.3874/2000. We, by a separats order pronounced today, allowed fhnt writ petition fited by the State and its tiuthorities and set oside the order of •tlie Tribunal dated29.10.1999 made in O.A.No. 942/t993. In that view ofthe fflatt-er, the very bosis for seekirig releif in this wn't petition disappears.ond tfieFefore, the writ petition is tiabte to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, we dismiss the writ petition for4he reasons stated by us in the order passed in W.P.No.3874/2000. 5. No costs. Sd/.T ~^~ (3iief Justice V. Sd;- Ditip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge