THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.17377 of 2009 DATED: 21.08.2009 Between: Smt. Mahmooda Begum and others. .. Petitioners. And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy, Medak District, and others. .. Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents 1 and 2. It appears, there is a dispute as to the entries made in the revenue records against Sy.Nos.1170 and 1171, totally admeasuring 75.16 gts situated at Ameenpur village of Patancheru Mandal, Medak District, which was leftover while conducting resurvey to Sy.Nos.96/6 and 96/7 (old) re-numbered as Sy.Nos.154 to 159 and Sy.Nos.160 to 168 respectively, and in that regard, pursuant to the application submitted by the 3rd respondent seeking correction and inclusion of his name in the revenue records in respect of the aforesaid lands, the Assistant Director (Survey & Land Records) conducted survey and allotted the aforesaid Sy.No.1170 for the land to an extent of 32.30 gts. found to be deficit in Sy.Nos.154 to 159, and Sy.No.1171 for the land to an extent of Ac.42.26 gts. found to be deficit in Sy.Nos.160 to 169 and issued Supplementary Sethwar, and by his letter dated 15.04.2004, sent the same to the 2nd respondent-Mandal Revenue Officer, Patancheru, requesting him to implement the same in the revenue records and, ultimately, the 2nd respondent issued proceedings dated 29.04.2004, directing the Village Panchayat Secretary, Ameenpur, to implement the Supplementary Sethwar issued by the Assistant Director (Survey & Land Records), Medak at Sanga Reddy, as per the allotment of new Sy.Nos. 1170 and 1171 to the land admeasuring Ac.32.30 gts. and 42.26 gts. respectively, in Phaisal patti for the year 2003-04, by recording the name of the 3rd respondent herein in the Pahani for the year 2003-04. The grievance of the petitioners is that aggrieved by the orders dated 29.04.2004 passed by the 2nd respondent, they preferred appeal before the 1st respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy, but so far the 1st respondent has not disposed of the said appeal. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the 1st respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal purported to have been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 29.04.2004 passed by the 2nd respondent, as per law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 21.08.2009 Note: Issue CC in three days. B/o v v