.ftr^s ra IGLE u m THE HIfiH COURT QF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. 227 No.. 6^3 .^.. /2010 PETITIONERS •^^^^. .^e^-s^ £>• ..c vir""""~ .*'sv".'\\'6-' •9V-'~ ,,..- :^. ' 0-At.--" ^'' /..^^:';"' " ' ^-'•" r' 2./. Sujan Singh s/o fow6ci^a& ':=e~ Aged about5^-years. Caset :- Gond, R/o Village Batari, Dipika, Tahsil :- Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.) Babu Singh S/o Sukhlal Singh Aged about^y years R/o Village Batari, Dipika, Tahsil :- Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.) -:VERSUS:- RESPODENTS:- ,^s^ ./^^/sS%. /i^^\ F^, /-,,-^_^ -^^, 1» 'V/wM @®iT?1'sw E % ^^.^-^-i:-^f-.^ ^ '^ ^'^••^'^•^^^ s .» V^S-^-SSff". -ta^^'s^'.-y '"'"l-?^'?!^?'-.t;''7'''T'''''' r 2. 3. Sindhu Education foundafion R/o Village Batari, Dipika, Tahsil:- Katghora, District - Korba (C.G.) Through :- Power ofAttorney Holder Shubhram S/o Deepchand, aged about 62 years R/o :- Urja Nagar, Dipika , District :- Korba (C.G.) State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Board Of Revenue, Bilaspur District: Bilaspur, Tahsil 8s District - Bilaspur (C.G.) State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Collector District - Korba (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI©H6©URT?oe^MAW fS'rio!fe;BShchi;;!-!""*b!sM''.JuSt!c^^?'rasha"tKuniarM hral W.P. f227) No.609»201^ PETITIONERS , , Sujan Singh&another VS:1:-.'..,1': ..,:•.:, :( :: . RESPQNDENTS Sindhu Education Foundation & 2 others Pr^c^ht? Mr/KemantGupta, ^yocateforthepetjtipners.^^^^^. Mr.V.K.Dubey.AdygeatewithMr.A.Dub^.^v&cateforrespandenfNo.T NoneforreSpQndent'No.2. 'v^ ; Mr. aanjeey ngarwal, P.i-. for the respondeni iSio.3, ©RDERtOral} (•<8tRNoVern*isF,a010} 1. Heard, 2. The refiefciaimeci in this writ ^ition is for ^ continue interim^orderdated 25.5.201ffl {finnexyrel^^ disposedoffciytheresponde!ntl<lo.2-Boarcl^of:^Revenye.i 3. The petitioners tiave preferFed a reyenue revision before the respondent N6.2- Board of Revenue to chalienge the order passed by the Additionai Gollector, Korba on 03.Q5.2010 ^nnexure R-1) in Case No.3;B-12TA)9-10. tn the said revenue revision an interim relief was granted in favour of the petitionerS on 25.5.2010 0^nh^yreE^5),h6wever,^he'saidinteFirn^^^o^ respondentNo.2-BoarclQfRewenueort 04.10.ZQlC^^mnexure P-1) andthematter was fixedforfinalarguments. • 4; It is informed at the Bar that the matter has been heard finally by ihe Boafd Qf Revenue, however.final orders have notyet been passed. ThisCourt had earlier granted interim relief in favouF of the petitioners direcfing that the interim: reiief )ranted by the Board of Revenue on 25.5.2Q10 shall remain operative. >. Learned counsel forthe respondent No.1 would submit thatsince the matte.r has aiready been heard finally tiylhe Board of Revenue, this petition may be disposed of by continuing the ihterim oraer granted by this Gourt to the effect that interim order granted by the Board of Revenue on 2S.&.2010 shali continue. ; >. Learned counsel forthe petitionerswouldaisosubmitthattheipstitionioanbe disposed of with the aforesaid direction. 7. fft view ofthe above submissrons offearned counsel forthe parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direGtion to respondent No.2-Board of Revenue that interim ordergranted bythe Board ofRevenue on 25.5.20TO (ARnexuc&P-a) shailcontinuetilithematterisfinaiiydisposedofbytheBoardofRevenue. 8. Certifiedcopyasperrules. Sd//- PrashantKumar Mishra Judge ^sfctc/^