IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.238 of 2009 CHOTEY NARAYAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 4. 06.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. From the order passed in the writ application of the petitioner it appears that petitioner intended to file a representation before the respondents for payment of remaining amount of dues of salary. In the circumstances, the writ application was disposed of with a liberty to petitioner to file a representation before the respondents within a period of one month and the same was directed to be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation by a speaking order. From Annexure-B it appears that the representation of the petitioner was considered and a speaking order was passed denying his claim. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he has remedy by way of filing a fresh writ application - 2 - against the same. So far as order of this Court is concerned, the same stands substantially complied with. In this view of the matter, this contempt proceeding is dropped. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)