..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.296 OF 2008 Mr.Vijay Kaluram Kasurde. ..Applicant. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Mr.J.Shekhar, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the Respondent-State. .. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : MARCH 05, 2008. DATED : MARCH 05, 2008. DATED : MARCH 05, 2008. [IN CHAMBER, 2:35 P.M.] P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail. The applicant had earlier preferred an application for bail which came to be rejected by this Court by order dated 6th June, 2007. Though the application came to be rejected, liberty was granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail in case the trial is not concluded by the end of October, 2007. 3. Looking to the fact that the trial was not concluded by the end of October, 2007 the ..(2).. applicant preferred bail application before the Special Court, Pune and as the said application came to be rejected, this bail application has been preferred by the applicant. It is stated that the trial in the said case is almost over and only one witness remains to be examined. In such case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant at this stage. 4. Application is rejected. 5. In case the trial is not concluded by 30th April, 2008, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)