^- 1 c .rv^ INTHEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH 03 WRIT PETITION N0. l-^2-S~ /2005 PETITIONER -te? -<i^ (• <<^ ^ ^ ^y^ ^^.^ Versus Nand Kumar Chandrawanshi, S/o. Chandrika Prasad Chandrawanshi, aged about 46 years, At present resident of Village-Bhareli Post Kharhata Block-Bodla, Tatisil 85 Distt. Kawardha, (C.G.). < ,^ <yo -^ % o^ s-;>- ^ 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (C.G.). ^ 2) Director of Public Instructions, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office) Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) <^3) Deputy Director of Public Instruction, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Education Department, Education District Bilaspur, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^':s (^& XI-HC-22 '^o? ^WW^, ^Tll^^Ko, i®S<rtW^< ST^T'^I W\^ 3TI^T 5^^\^ ^f^a ^... w y y •^Y ^ V^r L- ^' '^ w^^ c^ NSN<r(l <5hHlcb 3ff^?r ^^K _..^.:f.J..^ll^... "^ 200 •I^^T' ^TI^T'^HW^'cT 25.4.2003 Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for^the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Agrawal., Panel La^yer for the State. Heai'd. The case of the petitioner is| State of M.P, conducted a test for 4 that the Education Department of erstwhile he appointment of Assistant Teachers in the Government Primary Schools. In t|iat test the petitioner was selected and vide order dated 8.10.1982 he was a^pointed at the fixed pay of Rs.350/- per month. However, the eervices of tll' and vacancy which arises on acco| services was filled by the State of| making representations for consi^ering the petitioiier to the appointment o?i the post of teacher. Further case erstwhile State of M.P. took a decil of Shiksha Karmi but same is] Chhattisgarh. Learned counsel for the allowed to make a representation and respondent No.2 be directed t^ counsel for the respondent has no facts and circumstances of the representation within a period o receipt of the representation after petitioner in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid Consequently, I.A. Nos.295( Certified copy as per rules. chl^id^l"* ^w^ ^ ^S <F^^K ^T 3?rf^FT 3TT^T e petitioner were discontinued on 30.4.1983 Ant of the discontinuation of the petitioner?s M.P. Thereafter, the petitioner is regulariy ?f the petitioner is that in the year 1997 the .^ion to appoiiit the ad-hoc teachers in place not being implemented by the State of ^etitioner submits that petitioner may be o respondent No.2 raising ail his grievances decide his representation, to which leanied ^bjection. Having heard learned cou3|isel for fhe parties aiid having regard to the {^ase, the petitioner is allowed 16 make a ten doys from today to respondent No.2 raising all his grievances and in ti.|rn respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner w^hin another three months from the date of considering all the grievances raised by the the petition stands disposed of. /05 c3s 2957/05 also stand disposed of, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge