:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1543 OF 2005 IN WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.555 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Tracstar Investments Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Ms. Y.D. Ghawale i/by Roys Law Firm for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 16TH JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. There is a delay of 86 days in preferring the appeal. There is affidavit in support showing cause, has been filed. 2. Heard parties. Considering the cause shown the same would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) :2: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.555 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Tracstar Investments Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Ms. Y.D. Ghawale i/by Roys Law Firm for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 16TH JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. By separate order similar question has been answered by us in Wealth Tax Appeal No.554 of 2005. For same reasons as set out therein, the present appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO,J.)