IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3966 of 2010 MANOHAR PRASAD SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE ----------- 5. 25.2.2011. Heard Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. A.K.Singh, learned Junior Counsel to Mr. Pravin Kumar Singh, appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. It so appears that both the opposite parties as well as the petitioner have preferred Letters Patent Appeals separately against the order passed in the writ proceedings. Whereas the appeal preferred by the petitioner is numbered as L.P.A.No.1715 of 2010, that of opposite party is L.P.A.No.262 of 2011. As both the parties have separately assailed the order of this Court by filing appeals, I am of the opinion that the present contempt application cannot proceed and is accordingly disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)