1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 521 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.183 OF 2010 Sarjerao Keshav Patil .... Applicant. v/s The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent. Mr. Shekhar Ingawale for the applicant. Mrs. M.R. Tidake, APP for the State. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for suspension of order of conviction passed by the trial court convicting the present applicant for the offence punishable under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. Several submissions were made by the learned Counsel for the applicant pointing out discrepancies in the prosecution case. 3. In my view, submissions made by the learned Counsel 2 for the applicant cannot be accepted particularly in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in K.C. Sareen v. CBI, Chandigarh reported in (2001) 6 SCC 584. Hence, the application for suspension of the conviction is dismissed. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Liberty is given to the applicant to apply for fixed date of hearing. 4. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)