I.' .^: ,rt HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IVI.A.fCINo. 311/2007 SSngle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. ADDellants Claimants Respondents Non-applicants 1. P.Vijaya,D/OLateR.Anantrao, Aged about34 yrs. 2. R. Ravindra Kumar S/0 Late R. Anantrao, aged about 39 years. All R/0 Tatibancjh Colony, P.S. Amanaka, Raipur Tah & Distt. Raipur Versus 1. Mangal Jeet Singh @ Manjeet Singh, S/p Balbir Singh aged about 22 yrs. R/o Near Employnient Office, Pandari Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (CG) 2. Nand Kishore Rathi. S/tf B^nshi Lal Rathi R/o Vill-Bhanpuri Raipur, Tah & Distt. Raipur (CG) | 3. The National Insurance Co. Ltd Through: pivisional Manager, Divisional Office Mobin Mahal, G.E. Road Raipur (CG) Present: ShrrP.M.Shriwas.learnedcounselfortheappellants ORALORDER (Passed on 14ttr March, 2007) The following oral order of the Court was passed *by Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. 2. Heard. The only point urged by the learned counsel forthe appellants is that the multiplier applied by the learned M.A.C.T. was yvrong. However, a perusal of para 13 ofthe impugnedaward shows that the deceased was aged 73 or in any case was more tlian 65 years of age, atthetime ofaccident. 3. In this viewofthe matter.the multiplier 5 was rightlyapplied by the learned M.A.C.T. No ppier point was ui^ed by the learned counsel for the appellants. This ap^eal is dismissed being devoid of merit. '\ •.., ss>^^ »>osa^