HI€§H €QUR’F QF CHHA’E‘TISGARH, EILA§PIIR wmgg m: 374g g: 2mg PETETE$E§3§R Radh.eshyam Singh Thakur, sfo Shri " Manharall Singh, agéd about 60 wars, R/ o Adawh Colony, Bi}aspur(CG) Versus _EE$?ONDEHT5 1a Stata of Chhattisgarh thraugh the Secretaiy, Civil Supplies 3a VCcnsunmr Pr0t€c1ion Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur{C,G.) ‘ 2. The: Dimctar, Ciml SuppHc‘S :85 Cansumar Protaction D6partment, Raipur(CG) WRIT ?ETiTi3w ETEDER ART!CLE 2.2 3F THE CONSTITUEGE’ OF INBEA AEEearance; $11117. Anamd Kmnar Tiwaxi, cmmse} for the pa1iti0uer, Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genm‘a]. for the: State on advance, copy. GRAL GRBER g16.07.2ocsg SUNEL KUMAR SIHHA, J. H6m‘d fmally with, the‘conseut of the, partifx Th€ petitioner, who ig working on the. pogt of Assistant Foad Officer, has bean t]"anSfen‘6d from BilaSpur to Kota 011 admiluistra‘iivs greunds Vida order dated W11 July,2008. L€arnet1 commas] for tho petitioner submits that as per ordor (iated 293.2008 (Annexure P/ 1), tho date of suporarmiiation of tho potitiouar is 30.9.2008 and themfore, this diopiacamem of the potitionor ai, the verge of his miirsmelit wouid create great haiiiohip for him, which also runs contrary to the epixit of the Policy framed by the Government on. 2.9m May, 2008. He takes me to clause 5.5.3 of the said. policy and submits that though the etitioner is hein sent at a. (iiffeteut )laoe in the same district1 which is his home rlistrict also, but it would create. many 5d it’ticulties to the petitioner at the time of final settlement after his 2, W.P.( S LNG. 3742/2008 mtirement. He prays for quashm ent of the order of franSfer of fhe pefitionmx Oh th6 other hand, learned Dy. Advocate Gmwml for the State op130Ses these arguments. However, he also daes not dispute that the petitioner 3'3 going to lethe 011 30.9.2008 and only about 2 1/2 months are left for his retirement. Considering the facts and circumstaaces of the case, I deem it proper to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the concerned authority for taking decision 011 the same. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a (thiection that if so advised, the petitioner may tile a detaiied tepresentatjon before the concerned authon'ty within a period of: 15 days from today for setting aside the order of transfer and if such a representation is tiled, the concerned authority shal] dispose of the same at the earliest, keeping in mind the period left for retirement of the petitioner. It is further directed that tiil the decision on the representation is taken, the order of transfer of the petitioner shall not be given edect to. The petition stands finally disposed. of. ‘ Sunil Kumar Sinha ; Judge