olt IE 2.*IN THE HIGH COURT OF' -r- cRL.Rtiv.P.3t2008 SIJRESH AIIUJA DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr. Jagjit ..... Petitioner Singh, Advocate. versus STATD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Aryind Kumar Gupta, App for the State. COITAM: IION'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHAIINA ORDER 01.10.2010 1-hc present revision petition is directed against the order dated 12th septcrnber, 2007 by which the learned tr.ial court has allowed the application unde^' Section 216 of the code of Criminal procedure,l)73 and lras directed that thc charge be framed under Section 420 of thclldian Penal Code, 1860 in respect of alleged acts of cheating by the petitioner against Mr. c.s. Anand and Mr. Davinder Singh Kohli (wrongly mentioned in the impugned order as Ravinder Singh Kohli). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioncr has settled the matter with both Mr. C.S. Anand and Mr..Davinder Singh Kohli. I-Ie accordingly seeks permission to withdraw the present revision pelition and file relevant docurnents/papers before the trial court. Accordingly, the revision petition is disrnissed as withdrawn with libertv I L Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified l1 TI as prayed for. The FIR in question was registered in the year 1990 on a cornplaint made by Ms. Amarjit Kaur Kohli. The petitioner has already settled the matter with Ms. Amarjit Kaur Kohli. As the case is very old, the learned trial court will take up the case at the earliest and dispose of the same expeditiously. /t -/C llr ( -' Lt SANJIV KHANNA. J. ocroBER 01,2010 "Y ,I