IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16201 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 23, 2009 The Punjab State Cooperative Supplies and Marketing Federation Limited,Chandigarh .....PETITIONER Versus Shri Ved Vyas ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Mr.Jai Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. The Punjab State Cooperative Supplies and Marketing Federation Limited (MARKFED) has filed this petition for challenging the order dated 28.4.2009 (Annexure P6) passed by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, whereby the revision petition filed by respondent No.1 was partly allowed and the matter has been remanded back to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal of respondent No.1 afresh, after taking into consideration the observations made in the order and providing an opportunity of hearing to respondent No.1. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner and going through the impugned order, I do not find any ground to interfere in the said remand order in exercise of the writ jurisdiction of this Court. The revisional authority while considering the order of the Appellate Authority has observed that the Appellate Authority has not taken into consideration various submissions made by respondent No.1, which have been discussed C.W.P. No.16201 of 2009 -2- in the impugned order, due to which a serious prejudice has been caused to respondent No.1. Since the matter has been remanded back to the Appellate Authority to take a fresh decision after considering all the points raised by respondent No.1, I do not find any ground to interfere in such order of remand, as in my opinion no prejudice is going to be caused to the petitioner-Federation if the matter is reheard by the Appellate Authority and a fresh decision is taken. Dismissed. October 23, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE