C.R. No. 2543 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2543 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.09.2010 M/s. P. Gian and Company .... Petitioner Versus M/s. Lajpat Rai Rajeev Kumar and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Rajan Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.D. Bansal, Advocate for the respondents 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed assailing order dated 22.3.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.) Bathinda whereby an application for additional evidence was declined. The brief facts of the present case are that plaintiff has filed suit for recovery of Rs. 4,01,964/-. Plaintiff's main case is that plaintiff issued one cheque amounting to Rs. 1,00,000/- to the defendant which defendant has deposited in his Bank account being maintained with the Indian Bank, Branch Bathinda. It is further contended by the plaintiff that the cheque deposited by the defendant in his account was encashed and entire amount of the cheque was deposited in the account of the defendant. Both the learned counsel for the parties fairly stated that C.R. No. 2543 of 2010 2 present petition be disposed of with consent in the following terms:- (i) Official of Indian Bank shall be summoned by the plaintiff through dasti summons and that official of the Bank shall be called to place on record statement of accounts of the defendant. (ii) Learned trial Court shall fix any date convenient to the trial Court for summoning, examination and for producing relevant entries of the defendant accounts before the Court and on that date official of the Bank shall be examined. (iii) Plaintiff shall pay Rs. 10,000/- as costs, Rs. 5,000/- to the plaintiff and Rs. 5,000/- to the District Legal Aid Committee. Parties shall appear before the trial Court on 8.10.2010. Petition stands disposed of with the consent of learned counsel for the parties in the above terms. (ALOK SINGH) 22.09.2010 JUDGE reena