IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38602 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 2/ 01/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence in a complaint case under Sections-498A of I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act. that allegedly the complainant herself re-married, can be more appropriately considered or examined before the court below where the complainant is presumed to be properly represented on each date in the trial. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. The court below shall ensure that the prayer for regular bail is not rendered infructuous awaiting confirmation from the complainant of her re-marriage. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)