'S^SiSrf" SS3sfSS"!,f:!£-^\;;^B? ....^Nr. ^5^^-""" ^•-•"" ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISGARH at BILASPUR . ^LF'' /^o ^: WMT PETITIONfcjNO. ^t^q'S / 2006 y PETITIONER te?^(- ^n?^ ^^'cu ^^ QVJS.^ 10 ft. 0. %^' Lakhanlal Patwa S/o Shri. Ramayanlal Patwa Aged about 36 Years, Resident of- Street No. 2, Village- Damaroo, Lavan Road, Balodabazar, Dt.: Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1 /-' State of Chhattisgarh, Throuzh: The Department ofTransport, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR-492001 The Regional Transport Authority, RAIPUR-492001 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE^ OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC. HI6H CO;RT OF JUDIC4TURE CHHATnSSARH: BILASPUR Single Beneh: H<m'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. W,P.No.4392ofZQQ6 Petitioner Lakhanial Pa+wa Versus Respondents ; Sta-te of Chhatt'isgarh &others Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay 5. Agarwat, Sovemment Advocate for the respondents. OR&ER »«h ( 29Tn <4ugust. 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner- has applied for permcment permit under Section 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on 23.5.2006 before he respondent No.2. Ths petitioner has also availed the provisions of Sections 59, 70 cnd 71 of the Act for the purpose of adjudication of his above apptication for permanent permit. The route for which the petitioner has applied is Baloda Bazar to Sidhori via Lavan, Kasdol, Knrgi and Baloda Bazar to Raipur via Palari, Kharora, Sargaon. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner, at this stage submits that the reqiondents be directed to 'consider and decide the opplication of the petitioner, pending consideration befors tiie reqsondent No.2 since 23.5.2(X)6, in accordance with hw wi'thin a reasonable time, to which leamed counssi appearing for the re^iondents haye no objection. 3. The Respondent No.2 is accordingly directed to consider ond disposs of the application of the petitioner, if any, on its ovm merit, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. For the reasons stated above this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu