GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2619 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 2619 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 2619 OF 2004 IN IN IN CRI. CRI. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 915 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 915 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 915 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant versus Vasant Kisan Pathare & ors ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri B.H.Mehta APP for State. Shri M.S.Mohite for Respdt. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.C. V.C. V.C. DAGA, JJ. DAGA, JJ. DAGA, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 13TH JUNE, 2005 13TH JUNE, 2005 13TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Application for condonation of delay allowed for reasons mentioned therein. Heard the ld. APP on merits of the application for leave to appeal. Taking into consideration the elaborate discussion made by the ld. Judge in paras 15, 21 and 22 of the judgment holding that the evidence of eye witness was not trustworthy and acquiting the accused on the basis of evidence as stood on record, we see no reason to interfere with the well reasoned order of the learned Judge. Leave therefore rejected. ...