1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO.440 OF 2005 IN SUM.SUIT NO.2321 OF 2001 Rukmini Rajendra Machha. ..Plaintiff. V/s. M/s.Multi-Arc India Ltd. ..Defendant. Mr.Chirag Balsara i/b Raj Baid for plaintiff. Mr. Rakesh Kumar i/b Kamlesh Singh for defendant. Mr. R.C.Parekh, representative of defendants. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the parties states that parties have amicably settled their disputes out of the court. The same is reduced in writing in the form of consent terms. The consent terms are duly signed by the both the parties and their respective advocates. Both the parties are personally present in the court and accepted the contents of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record, marked ‘X’ for identification. Accordingly, suit is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Refund as per rule.