1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6262 OF 2010 Dr.Ramdas s/o Gyanuji Narwade, Age 56 years, Occu.Service as Civil Surgeon, R/o H.No.1142, Sainagar, N-6, CIDCO, Aurangabad ..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Public Health Service Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 2. The Director, Directorate Office, Arogya Bhavan, 5th Floor, St.Johns Hospital Campus, P.D.Mello Road, Mumbai 01 ..RESPONDENTS Mr.Rajendrraa Deshmukkh, Advocate for petitioner Mr.S.K.Kadam, Assistant Govt.Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ DATE : 16th July 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V.HARDAS, J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays vide prayer clause (B) to the petition to issue writ directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 27.1.2010, which is said to be pending. 3. The Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.582 of 2010 had expressed hope and trust that the State Government would take an early decision in respect of the recommendations made in favour of the petitioner. However, it appears that no orders has been passed in respect of the representation of the petitioner dated 27.1.2010. 4. In the light of the fact that the said representation is pending, we allow this petition, and direct the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, if pending, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. Rule made absolute on the above terms with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE (vvr/6262.10wp)