IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.1634 of 2011 Date of decision : 28.1.2011 Multan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to the submission that the appeal which he has preferred against the order of reversal be decided expeditiously. He contends that the appeal has been pending since October 2010 but no date has been given to him. Further contends that even the application for stay has not been decided and that the remedy that he has resorted to his statutory one. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the case of the petitioner in appeal and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. If for some reason the said authority is prevented from deciding the main appeal due to any constraint then the application for stay shall be decided in the first instance. Needless C.W.P.No.1634 of 2011 -2- to say that all the authorities are expected to dispose of the matters before them as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months. 28.1.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss