IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2008 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 23144 of 2005(E) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. K.N.PEETHAMBARAN, AGED 58, S/O.NARAYANAN, KIZHUKKOTTATHIL HOUSE, KOZHIPPILLY P.O. KOTHAMANGALAM, VEHICLE SUPERVISOR, RTD. K.S.R.T.C. KOTHAMANGALAM. 2. T.G.AYYAPPAN NAIR,A GED 58, S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR, AMBILY, WEST DESOM, DESOM P.O. ALUVA, VEHICLE SUPERVISOR, RTD. K.S.R.T.C. N.PARUR. 3. O.O.PAILY, AGED 58, S/O.OUSO, OLATTUPPURATH HOUSE, EDAVANAKKAD, P.O.ERNAKULAM, CONDUCTOR, RTD. K.S.R.T.C. N.PARUR. 4. K.I.SAMSUDDEEN, AGED 58, S/O.IBRAHIM, EDANAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUTTAM P.O. THAIKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, INSPECTOR RETIRED K.S.R.T.C. ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYAKUMAR SRI.V.N.MOHANADASAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C. ALUVA. 3. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C. KOTHAMANGALAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C. N.PARUR. BY SC ADV. SRI. JOHNSON P. JOHN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.23144 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2008 JUDGMENT When this matter was taken up for hearing, it is submitted by counsel for the respondents that the writ petition has become infructuous in respect of all the prayers except interest on Provident Fund. In regard to the claim for statutory interest payable to the second petitioner, if the said petitioner has any such complaint, it is for him to bring it to the notice of the first respondent by filing appropriate representation. If such a representation is filed by the second petitioner before the first respondent within one month from today, the first respondent will consider and take a decision thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter. Subject to the same, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb