IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20834 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AJI, S/O.MOHAMED BASHEER, NEDIYAKALA PUTEHN VEEDU, KUMMANNOOR P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE POLICE CHIEF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 14. 2. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TYHIRUVALLA POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLA. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KONNI POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27-7-2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT COPY TO 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL (TRUE COPY) PS TO JUDGE. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C). No. 20834 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The petitioner has approached this Court complaining that he is being harassed by the 4th respondent Sub Inspector of Police, Konni and also by the Circle Inspector of Police, Thiruvalla, the 3rd respondent. On the basis of instructions received from the two police officers, Mr. T.K. Vipindas, Govt. Pleader submitted that the 4th respondent wanted the presence of the petitioner in connection with the complaint received from a party within the limits of that police. That complaint has been settled between the parties and the petitioner's attendance is no longer necessary for the 4th respondent. But the third respondent Circle Inspector of Police wanted the details of the petitioner in connection with the investigation of Crime No. 341/11 wherein the offence alleged is theft in a temple. It is not WP(C). 20834/11 -2- known whether the petitioner will have to be arrayed as accused in the above case. In the circumstances, we are inclined to dispose of this writ petition recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader and directing the third respondent and for that matter, any other police officer, to issue notice to the petitioner, if the petitioner's attendance is required in connection with investigation of any crime or any other matter. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) ksv/-