1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6419 OF 2007 Sanjay s/o Vinayak Sonawane, Age: 31 years, Occ: Nil, R/o. Parner, Tq. Parner, District Ahmednagar. ...PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through the Department of Rural Development and Water Conservation, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7501 OF 2008 ... Shri. A.S. Sawant, Advocate for petitioner. Shri.V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 4. Shri. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 2. The petitioner challenges the certificate issued to respondsent No.3, who was appointed, having 40% disability. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Medical Board, constituted by the State, is the only authorised Medical Board to certify the percentage of the disability of such candidates. 4. Original record was produced before us by the learned Counsel Shri. S.T. Shelke. We have perused the Government Resolution dated 06-05-2004 (Exhibit-B) more particularly clauses 6 and 8. We have also perused the instructions issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik, dated 27-11-2006 addressed to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik, Dhule, Jalgaon, Ahmednagar, and Nandurbar. 5. Considering the original record, we find that 3 the Medical Board at the District level had certified the disability of respondent No.3. In this view of the matter, no interference is warranted, in exercise of our extra ordinary writ jurisdictioin. The Writ Petition is dismissed. 6. As the Writ Petition itself is dismissed, nothing survives for consideration in the Civil Application. Civil Application is disposed of. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] SUT/JUNE10/wp6419.07