BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11939 of 2011 1. MANIVANNAN 2. KODI 3. PARAMESWARI 4. CHILLADI @ SURESH 5. AMUTHA 6. VELLADURAI 7. KARTHI 8. BALAMANI : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 to 8 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPARANKUNDRUM POLICE STAION, MADURAI DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.211/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.HEMAKARTHIKEYAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 427, 454, 294(b), 506(ii) and 379 (NP) of I.P.C., in Crime No.211 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A8 in Crime No.211 of 2011. He further submits that on the basis of the complaint given by the first petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.199 of 2011 under Sections 307 I.P.C. against seven persons and hence, the husband of the defacto complainant was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. As the counter blast, the petitioners are falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have caused damage to the house hold articles of the defacto complainant and the value of the damaged article is worth about Rs.60,000/- and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the occurrence has been taken place on 28.08.2011 and even though the petitioners were not arrested neither they interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Madurai, subject to the following stringent conditions:- (i) The petitioners 1 and 2 shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each to the credit of Crime No.211 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Madurai; (ii) The petitioners 3 to 8 shall deposit a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Forty Thousand only) together to the credit of Crime No.211 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Madurai; (iii) On such deposits they shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Madurai; and (iv) The petitioners shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Madurai daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. (v) The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 09/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.6, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPARANKUNDRUM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. K.HEMAKARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.30961 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11939 of 2011 NSV/13.9.11/2P/6C Date :09/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/