IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 625 OF 2006 PROF. MARIA ELSA NORONHA WOLFANGO ....Petitioner DE SILVA (DECEASED) THROUGH HER LEGAL HEIR MR. ANTONIO SEQUEIRA Versus MRS. RICARDINA EMILIA GUEDES DE ....Respondents ALMEIDA DE SILVA NORONHA (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS Mr. S. K. Kakodker, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Joel D' Souza, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. P. Kamat, Advocate for Respondent nos. 1(b), 2, 3, 6 & 7, LRs of R.no. 4 & 5 (a, b, & i). Coram:- J. N. PATEL, J. Date:- 27th December, 2006 P.C. Heard. 2. The petitioner/original plaintiff has taken exception to the Order dated 20.12.2006, passed by the Trial Court. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the issues have not been properly framed in the matter and it would prejudice the case of the plaintiff and, therefore, the issues deserve to be re-framed/re-casted as per the draft issues submitted. 3. This is a Supreme Court expedited matter. The whole controversy rests on the interpretation of the Will through which the parties are claiming their respective rights. This Court finds that though according to the plaintiff the issues framed by the trial Court are not happily worded, this may not be a reason for this Court to interfere in the matter. The parties can proceed to lead their respective evidence as it will not be proper for this Court to interfere in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction at this stage. Parties are well aware of the lis between them. Therefore, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. Expedite authenticated copy. J. N. PATEL, J. arp/*