CR No. 1546 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1546 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 07.03.2011 Satpal ....Petitioner Vs. Vijay Kumar and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 12.02.2011 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dasuya, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') for additional evidence, was dismissed. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the record of the Company is very much necessary to prove the sale deeds as null and void. Heard, earlier the petitioner had summoned Ashwani Kumar to prove the record of the company, but he stated that he is not in possession of the record as he had handed over the record to Ishant son of Vijay Kumar, Director of the Sarthak Construction Company, New Delhi. In these circumstances, the opportunity provided to the petitioner could not be said to be completed. He could not summon Ishant as he never knew that he is now the Director in CR No. 1546 of 2011 2 possession of the record. Therefore, this petition is accepted. The impugned order dated 12.02.2011 (Annexure P-4) is set aside and the petitioner is granted one opportunity to summon Ishant son of Vijay Kumar, Director of Sarthak Construction Private Ltd. alongwith record, as mentioned in the application Annexure P-2. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this Court for recalling this order. Copy of the order be given under the signatures of the Court Secretary of this Court. (A.N.JINDAL) 07th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp