C ff- <-^ 8er>®h IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.S No... ...^. .^..~JC^.. .../2009 Anup Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Revati Raman Mishra Aged about 51 years, R/o Bramha Path, Ambikapur Dista-ict Sarguja (CG) PETITIONER: ^<«y .?>•-' RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. 3. Cenfaral Bank of India Through the Managing Director Chander Mukhi, Nariman Mumbai - 400 021 Point Sarguja Kshefa-iya Gramin Bank Through the Charrman Head Office Kum.ar complex, Mahamaya Gl'iowk, Ambikapur, Distarict Sarguja (CG) Shri Vurendra Kumar Gupta Chairman, Sarguja Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Kumar complex, Mahamaya Chowk, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG) 4. Inquiry Officer (Branch Manager) Sarguja Kshetriya Gramm Bank, Branch Kumda, Disfa-ict Sarguja (CG) PETITION UNDER^^RT!CLE^26^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRETS AND DIRECTIONS:- HIGH COURT OF CHHAITISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3232 of2009 PETmONER : Anup Kumar Mishi-a. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Central Bank oflndia & Others. WRlT PETITION UNDER AR11CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satisfa K. Aeniliotri. J. Present: Shri Varun Shanna, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 and 4. OKDER (ORAL) (Passed oa 01st day of April, 2010) Amit 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has fiied this petition impugning notice dated 23.05.2009 (Annexure P/l) whereby imposition ofpenalty was proposed. During pendency of fhis petition, the tmal pumsliment order has been passed and tliis petition has become uifructuous. 2. Shri Sharma JMrther submits fhat the petitioner may be pemiitted to take up the matter to the appellate authority against the final order of punishment ofremovaj from service. 3. Be that as it may, it is not necessary to graiit any liberty to fhe petitioner as this is for the petitioner to take recourse to any other forum, vyhatsoever may be available to the petitioner under the provisioiis of law. Since the final order ofpunishment is not under challenge in this petition, this petition has become inlhictuous. 4. Accordingly, ttie writ petition is dismissed as having become urihictuous. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge