IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2010 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1201 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19627/2010 Dated 24/06/2010 ) PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------- M/S.ROMAN TARMAT LTD,REGISTERED OFFICE AT GENERAL VAIDYA MARG,GOREGAON EAST,MUMBAI-400 063 HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT MANIMADOM, AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,PIN-688 561,REP BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER,SRI,R.ANANTHA NARAYANAN. BY ADV. SRI.E.P.GOVINDAN RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT: --------------------------------- SMT.PRASANNA S, THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER(WC& LT)OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES,ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SRI V.K. SHAMSUDEEN. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. C.O.C. No. 1201 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 10th December , 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the Contempt Case no longer subsists, in view of the fact that the representation preferred by the petitioner has been considered and an order has been passed on 02.11.2010, a copy of which has already been served to the petitioner . The learned Counsel also submits that the petitioner would like to pursue the matter by filing appropriate proceedings challenging the said proceedings and hence the Contempt Case is not pressed any further. In the above circumstance, this Court does not find it necessary to proceed with the contempt proceedings any further. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to challenge the order, if at all, he is aggrieved in any manner. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk