IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 Mat.Appeal.No. 865 of 2008() --------------------------- OP.111/2005 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA .............. APPELLANT/RESPONDENT : ------------------------------------------ LILLI KUTTY, D/O. KOCHUMUKALIL ELIYAMMA, SALEM BHAVAN, KARUVATTA MURI, ADOOR VILLAGE & TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT / PETITIONER : ------------------------------------------- SAJU MON, S/O. CHACKO, BETHEL PEZHUVILA VEEDU, POOYAPPALLY MURI, POOYAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK BY ADVS. SRI.IYPE JOSEPH SRI.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------- Mat.A.Nos.865 of 2008 & 15 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. These appeals are between a husband and wife. The husband filed O.P.111/05 before the Family Court for dissolution of marriage. The wife filed O.P.173/05 for recovery of certain amounts, including value of ornaments. Wife's suit was decreed in part and the husband's application was allowed. During the pendency of these appeals by the wife against the aforesaid, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and have filed I.A.2986/11 in M.A.865/08 and I.A.2998/11 in MA.15/09. That results in a settlement of the disputes between the parties and is a compromise. We record terms of the said compromise and the decrees of the court MA.865/08 & 15/09 2 below will stand regulated by the terms of the said compromise. The appeals are ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR, Judge. kkb.14/12. //True Copy// P.S.to Judge