IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 254 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO BABULAL CHINTAMAL KUMAVAT Versus SMT.PUSHPABEN SAKHARAM PANKHEDKAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE UNSERVED for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 18/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT On elevation of the learned counsel for the petitioner as a Judge of this court, notice was issued to the petitioner. However, it has come back with the report of the bailiff dated 3rd March, 2000 that the petitioner had died 2 or 3 years previously and there were no heirs residing at the premises. The heirs and legal representatives of the petitioner have not taken any steps to bring themselves on record of the petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. ******* hki