IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29524 of 2011 Pappu Paswan son of Nand Lal Paswan @ Nunulal Paswan, resident of Mohalla-Baraitola, P.S.-Industrial Area, District- Vaishali Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 28.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Industrial Estate P.S. Case No.1 of 2010 registered for the offence punishable under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired in course of investigation in confessional statement of some of the co-accused. Apart from this, there is no other material against the petitioner. Taking into consideration nature of allegation and the fact that the case is still under investigation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed. After some argument learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Prayer is allowed. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular, the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced in any manner by this order. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)