(D ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ringleBencft WRITPETITION (C) N0. '^P^/ / 2011 PETITIONER ^^-. 'sy^!'^! RESPONDENTS Chandradeep Mittal, S/o. Shri Bajrang Mittal, Aged .about 22 years, R/o. Patthalgoan^'Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) .y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THECONSITUTION OF INDIA :} t^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 7186 OF 2011 Chandradeep Mittal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others ^) (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General forthe State with Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, is also present. ORDER (Passed on this 01st day of December, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate Generalappearing with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by the Chief Muhicipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court, submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, which without affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been withdrawn by subsequent notice dated 26.11 .2011.A copy of the said notiee is taken on record. In view of the above, aGCording to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unauthorized structure, as the sarne is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the cases of the persons concerned. , -_ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 3. 4. ashoic