IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2007 / 15TH PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 227 of 2007(L) IN OP.NO.33720 OF 2001 REVIEW PETITIONER:PETITIONER: V.HARIDASAN NAIR, S/O.VALAPPIL MADHAVI AMMA, KACHERI AMSOM & DESOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SATHISH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVENMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER (LR), LAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION, KOZHIKODE. 4. CORPORATION OF KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ R4 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------ REVIEW PETITION NO. 227 OF 2007 in O.P.NO. 33720 OF 2001 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of March, 2007 O R D E R The contention raised by the review petitioner in the Review Petition that a plot on the northern side of his property was excluded from acquisition, is not taken as a ground in the Original Petition. It is also not clear from the Review Petition whether the plot which is alleged to be excluded was included in the notification and subsequently excluded. The grounds raised in the Review Petition are not sufficient to exercise the jurisdiction of review. The Review Petition lacks merits and it is accordingly dismissed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------ ------------------------ R.P.NO. 227 OF 2007 IN O.P.NO.33720 OF 2001 O R D E R 6th March, 2007 ------------------------