V ' SMGLEJEIGH / L? H66 Q: [7W 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. WC? Y OF 20140.. (D PETITIONERS :1. Lakhan Lal Verma, S/o. Shri Ram Dayal Verma, aged about 55 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Jhanki, Block— Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) Lakhan 1a1 Sinha, S/o. Shri Samliya Ram Sinha, aged about 54 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Nayakbandha, Block—Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Hemlata Thakur, W/o. Shri Dwarika Singh Thakur, aged about 54 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School Abhanpur, Block—Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) Nohar Singh Dhritlahare‘, S / o. Shri Sukhchand Dhritlahare, aged about 52 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School QNayakbandha, Block-Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) k g “nah x “Pm-4: VERSUS RESPONDENTS x. State of Chhattisgarh, Through :1The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) /3. Block Education Officer, Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) 14. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 51 6L . N’Q ($7 W~$1 w 200 mm (Wm WWW WW WWW mm§wm *Wm SB : HON’BLE MR. JUST10E IHKER DIWAKER ' 29:19.,2G10 Shxi Somkaxrt Vanna, cou Se} for th€ petitioners. Shxi Vai‘bhav Goverdhan, .L. for the State. Grisvance of the petition rs in the present petition are eacher or: a fixed pay scale of that they were appointed as Dy, Rs. 100-150 for a period of tw years ami after completion of probation, they were granted re lar pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Contention of the counsel for the petitioners is that they are entitled for regular pay so e with effect from the date of initial appointment and their ase is squarely covered with number of decisions passed y this Court and also the judgment rendered by the MR State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in o.A. No. 2745/89 g adhuiimnt Yadu a5 56 Others Vs. State of M.P. 85 Others) erein it has been held that similarly placed teachers are e11 ‘tled for regular pay scale from the date of their initial appointm nt. e panics that the matter was taken up by the State to the Ape Court but the appeal was also It is not disputed by both dismissed by the Apex Court holding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled for regular pay scale from the date of their initial appointment. In View of the above subtm'ssion made by the counsel for. the parties, the petition is disposed of in the same terrns i.e. the petitioners are granted liberty t‘o make a. representation, if so advised, in the light of the aforesaid judgment and the circular " 0 P T ‘ h p ’ XLEC—J8 W W, W13, 949$) WW ”7\ W §\C. W1 (p 200’ Wwm§ri33§m WWW WWW mwm WW§WW éwimanéw dat€d13.1.2009 (Annexure 13/7) and in turn, the concamed respondent is directad to considqr their case on its own men'ts and in its perspective. If the pctitioncrs stand on the same footing as per order passed by flie State Administrate Tribunal in Madhukant Yadu (supra) and : Supreme Court in Special Leave 7 order dated 3.1.1995, the petitio relief accordingiy. It is expected fmm the sta order after due scrutiny .ofthe fac Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker mbsequently coniirmed by the >eetion (oiva) No. 6892/93 by ners may he entitied to same te authorities to pass suitable ts. Jhdge