c-F L-f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M. c. c. NO. 336'" /2010 (S.B.l. APPELLANTS DEFENDANTS \^y ^^ ^S€f^ BB^ :1. Ram Sunder, Son of Shri Laxmi Narayan, aged about 00 years, resident of Torwa, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (since deceased). Shri Ratan Shukla, Son of Shri Ram Sundar, T. T. E., aged about 50 years, Resident of Torwa, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (since deceased). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Smt. Munni Bai. Wife of Shri BabuLal Soni, aged about <^9 years, Resident of Khaparganj, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (since deceased). 2. Babu Lal Soni, son of Shri Gaya Prasad Soni, aged about §0 years, resident of Khaparganj, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (since deceased). (i) Rajesh Kumar Soni, aged about 31 years, o ^ ^:): (ii) Shyam Kumar Soni, aged about 29 years, (iii) Smt. Kiran Soni, aged about 30 ' years, wife of Shri Jagdish Prasad Soni, (iv) Smt. Sadhna Soni, aged about 36 years, wife of Shri Laxmi Narain Soni, Resident of BALCO, Korba, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (v) Kumari Swati' Soni, aged about 24 years, (vi) Kumari Kalpna Soni, aged about 33 years, DBFENDANT N0. 3 RESPONDENT All Sons and daughters of Shri Babulal Soni; Nos. (i), (ii), (iii), (v) and (vi) All residents of Khaparganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C. G.) C^P.^v^^l^ 7. The State of,Chhattisgarhu Through : the Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICANTS ..^sys&i^ 1. Smt. Urmila Shukla, aged about 63 years, widow of Shri Shriratan Shukla, 1'C1^ : ^~^> 2. Shri Ranjan Shukla, aged about 35 years, son of late Shri Shri Ratan Shukla, Railway Electric Driver, Both Residents of Torwa, Bilaspur (Near Shiv Mandir) Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3. Smt. Nalini Awasthi, aged about 44 years, wife of Shri Praveen Awasthi, (daughter of late Shri Ratan Shukla) Resident of Vidhya Up Nagar (Kediya Gali), Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4. Mrityunjay Shukla, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Ratan, Shukla, Graduate Trainee, P.C.I. Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) Permanent Address Resident of Torwa, Bilaspur (Near Shiv Mandir) Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION QF SECOND APPEAL NQ. 330^2000 :HC—78 ^RTT^I^T^N? <cCT^?^T'^T?N? <- ^ r" MTR^fT ^^n^) 's's^ '^FTT^T, ^ri^R^, ^<'ii'y^< ^LC..L.t^l.!A?.L.ili b "^.200 Sn^T'q^T (^3S^) ^^nw^^^n^i SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kunkar Misfara. J. 02.07.2010 Shri Rmn Kumar Tiwari, c<|>i Leamed counsel submits tb applicants in MCC has not Leamed counsel submits tftat deceased, appellant and have notj their name has been mentioned at The explanation The MCC is treated to hav^ at tiie end oftiie cause title. Leamed counsel is heard oi filingtheMCC. Qn due considea-ation application, the delay in filing MCp Leamed counsel is fiirthef Qn due consideration restoration application, the MCC isj The order dated 5/01/2010 SecondAppeal No. 330/20p0 antl an^ J^..^ chl^fd^l^ ^??^f ^ 'fe^ <R»i^K ^^tRRW^T |>unsel for tiie applicants. lat as per office objection, name oftfie been n^entioned in appropriate place. since the applicants are legal heirs of been substituted m fhe second appeal, the bottom ofthe cause title. appea^ to jbejustified. been filed by Ihe applicants mentioned o4 application for condonation ofdelay in for the reasons mentioned in the 1C is condoned. heard on fhe restoration application. for fhe reasons mentioned in the allowed. jn second appeal is recalled. is restored to its ori^nal number. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge