{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8016 OF 2007 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.51 OF 2005 Divisional Controller, MSRTC, Ahmednagar APPLICANT VERSUS Ramnath S.Aher RESPONDENT ....... Mr.M.K.Goyanka, Advocate for the applicant ....... [CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 26th November 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. As the Letters Patent Appeal itself is dismissed, the present civil application does not survive and hence disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] drp/B10/ca8016-07 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.51 OF 2005 Divisional Controller, MSRTC, Ahmednagar APPELLANT VERSUS Ramnath S.Aher RESPONDENT ....... Mr.M.K.Goyanka, Advocate for the appellant ....... [CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 26th November 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. We have perused the impugned judgment and order. We do not find any error or perversity in the impugned order dated 27.06.2001, passed by the Single Judge (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.). 2. We are not convinced with the grounds raised in the Letters Patent Appeal. No case is made out. The appeal is dismissed. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] drp/B10/ca8016-07