/ (L/F io<7. in THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.(S) N0. I\^ /2010 Mahavir Prasad Sharma, S/o. Shri Ramkrishna Sharma, aged about 54 years, Acting Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Bodri, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, R/o. Near Munnu Lal School, Gondpara, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) ^~ OK' -^^ \o ,\*: ^ w^ ^•^ <^^° -^n> <!•• •:.'-'' L^' ^ :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner-cum-Director, Regional Office, Urban Administration and Deveiopment, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Municipal Officer, Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) [T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAITiSGARH : BiLASPUR WRiT PETITION (S) N0.1104 OF 2010 RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Wrlt Petition 'jnder Article 226 of the Constitution of India'i Sinate Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. 'esent:- Shri Ramakant Pandey, counoel for the pet Shri Atok Bakshi, Govt. 2. Gowri ie petitioner. :he State. /D-a—*<-t^A,A 11^<" -^ "7th -l-3a< A? a<-s-AH ''?ftl< rt\ ^rfiSsaiisU ^ii i.Hisb i f ueiy ufl iVKS^^il; ^.u?y? With the consent of iearned counsei appearing for the parties, the petitlon is heard finaiiy. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petinoner seeks permission of thls Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to pur.sue the representation dated 30-10-2009 (Annexure - P/3) pendine before the respondent suihorities. Learned counsei aiso prays thst the respondent authorities may klndly be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner at the eariiest. Learned counsel appearing for, the State submits that if the representation of the petjtioner \s pending, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own perspective, «vithina period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In view of foregoing, accordlng tolearned counset appearing for the petitioner nothiRg survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy; the writ petition is disposed of^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge