1 APPLN 4684 OF 2010.sxw vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4684 OF 2010. Sandip Pawar .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. P. M. Bopardikar, for the Applicant. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 13th December, 2010 P.C. 1. The applicant who had diverted the funds to the tune of Rs.61 lacs from the account of M/s Tata Motors, seeks enlargement of bail on the ground that the trial has not yet commenced as he was granted liberty by this Court, by order dated 17th December, 2009 in Criminal Application NO.4907 of 2009, to file fresh application for bail if the trial is not over within a reasonable period of time. Considering the nature of applicant's involvement in the alleged offence, applicant is not entitled to bail on merits. As far as trial not being over in reasonable period, the learned APP undertakes to instruct the Police Prosecutor Incharge of the case pending before J.M.F.C, Court No.4, Thane, to see that all the witnesses are kept present on the date as fixed by the learned 2 APPLN 4684 OF 2010.sxw J.M.F.C. The learned Magistrate shall also ensure that the case be taken up for early hearing considering the cases of other under trial prisoners pending before him and shall dispose of the same as early as possible. The application is rejected. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)