IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14816 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M.SIRAJUDEEN, PERFUSIONIST, DEPARTMENT OF CARDIO THORACIC SURGERY GOVERNMETN MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.H.HAMZA ROWTHER SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 3. THE SECRETARY, PAY REVISION COMMISSION - 2010, KERALA STATE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. ADV. SMT. NISHA BOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.14816 Of 2011-B ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T The main relief sought for in the Writ Petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P14 representation wherein the petitioner has pointed out certain anomalies in the pay revision. 2. The petitioner is working as Perfusionist in the Department of Cardio Thoracic Surgery, Government Medical College, Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram. Initially, the petitioner was appointed under the Health Service Department as Lab Technician Gr.II from 24.11.1988. Thereafter, he was inter- departmentally transferred to Directorate of Medical Education and appointed in the Medical College, Thrissur. He was promoted after acquiring the required qualification and he joined as Perfusionist in the Medical College Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram on 16.5.1994. According to the petitioner pay scale fixed for the said post is in a lower scale than that of Tutor in Laboratory Technology, Tutor Technicians, Lecturer in MLT, etc. The petitioner placed his grievance before the Pay Revision W.P.(C)No.14816/11 -2- Commission in the light of Exhibit P10 order as per Exhibit P11. But, their recommendation also did not redress the grievance of the petitioner. It is in these circumstance that Exhibit P14 has been submitted. 3. The learned Government Pleader on getting instructions submitted that in such cases, the competent authority to take a decision is the Finance Anomaly Ratification Cell attached to the Finance Department. 4. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of with a direction to the Finance Anomaly Ratification Cell attached to the Finance Department to consider the grievance raised by the petitioner in Exhibit P14 representation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition to the 1st respondent for compliance. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge