IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5934 of 2010 (1) Sushma Devi, wife of Anil Prasad Gupta (2) Anil Prasad Gupta, son of Ram Swaroop Gupta both Resident of village and P.S.Hariharganj, District-Palamau (Jharkhand)…………….Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ……………………Opposite Party ----------- 2. 17.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are the sisters-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased, petitioner No 2 is husband of the petitioner No. 1. they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 34 of 2007 registered under Section 304B and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No. 1 is the married sister of the husband of deceased. She resides at her matrimonial home in the district of Palamau with her husband (petitioner No.2. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners have nothing to do either with the affairs of the deceased or with the demand of dowry. Considering the fact that the petitioner No. 1 is residing in the district of Palamau and petitioner no. 2 is doing - 2 - his business at Jamshedpur, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of Shushma Devi and Anil Prasad Gupta are allowed. They are directed to be released on bail on appearance within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 34/2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. MKchy (Mridula Mishra, J.)