IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20566 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR BHASKAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4/ 18/08/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was highly unlikely that a person would give the PIN number of his A.T.M. Card to another to withdraw money. He next submits that there is no statement that the cheque in question was verified by the Bank officials from the specimen signature card and it was confirmed that it was not the signature of the complainant. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 17.6.2010 in connection with Complaint Case No.1809/09 pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, is hereby confirmed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)