1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4744 OF 2007 (Devrao Sitaram Chande .v. Subhash Sitaram Sable and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri R.R. Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.M. Ghare, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Shri D.B. Yengal, AGP for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. 29TH APRIL, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. The Tahsildar, at the instance of the respondent No.1, by exercising powers under Section 5 of Mamlatdar Court Act, 1906, granted injunction in favour of the respondent No.1 restraining the petitioner from obstructing suit way. This order of granting injunction in favour of the respondent No.1 was confirmed by the Sub Divisional Officer by an order dated 26.03.2007 in a revision filed by the present petitioner. The petitioner challenges legality and propriety of this order by filing present petition. The petitioner submits that the learned Sub Divisional Officer has ignored the observation of this Court in Writ Petition No.1320/2006 whereby the matter 2 was remanded back to decide the issue in controversy afresh. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Sub Divisional Officer has considered the issue of limitation as was raised by the petitioner before this Court in Writ Petition No.1320 of 2006. The learned Sub Divisional Officer also considered spot inspection report dated 13.04.2005. The Tahsildar as well as Sub Divisional Officer have concurrently held that the petitioner obstructed the respondent No.1 in using the suit way. In that view of the matter, the injunction granted in favour of the respondent No.1 and against the petitioner by the Tahsildar came to be confirmed by the SDO in revision. I do not find any error in the approach adopted by the lower Courts below and, therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in the concurrent findings of facts by the lower Courts below in exercise of my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This order will not prevent the petitioner from approaching in any alternate forum, if the same is available in accordance with law. JUDGE *rrg.