1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1871 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri K.D. Jha for the Petitioners. Shri Prem S. Gidwani for Respondent No.1 -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2010 P.C.: . The Petitioners are the third parties to a suit filed by the 1st Respondent against the 2nd and the 3rd Respondents. The suit filed by the 1st Respondent is specifically under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. 2. A Chamber Summons was taken out by the Petitioners praying that the 1st Respondent be directed to implead them as party defendants. By the impugned order, the said Chamber Summons has been dismissed. 2 3. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, I do not find that a case for interference is made out. The suit is filed under Section 6 of the Specific Reliefs Act, 1963. Issue of title is never decided in such suit. Even if the issue of title is decided, a separate suit filed by the parties on the basis of the title is not barred. It is obvious that the decree passed in the suit will not bind the Petitioners. Considering the limited scope of a suit under Section 6 of the said Act of 1963, the Chamber Summons has been rightly rejected. No case for interference is made out. 4. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)