: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1355 OF 1988 SUIT NO.1355 OF 1988 SUIT NO.1355 OF 1988 Hypro Pesticides Pvt.Ltd. .. Plaintiff. Versus Centaur Syndicate Corporation .. Defendant. Mr.Jagannathan V. i/b.B.H.Vyas for plaintiff. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 6th AUGUST, 2007. DATE : 6th AUGUST, 2007. DATE : 6th AUGUST, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Mr.Vyas, appearing for the plaintiff had been repeatedly requesting for adjournments in this matter and this Court had permitted him to firstly contact his client, after establishing contact, if any, to get instructions or if instructions are forthcoming to take further steps in accordance with law. After sufficient time was granted on each of these grounds, Mr.Vyas informed me that the plaintiff Company is in liquidation. That was the statement made on the last occasion and recorded in the order of this Court. Now, Mr.Vyas states that the liquidator could not be contacted nor any details : 2 : of the liquidation proceedings are known. These cannot be state of affairs in each and every matter, which is pending in this Court from 1988. The Court has been accommodating the Advocates even if their clients are not responding or their appearances are not withdrawn. . That does not mean that the Advocates are not bound to assist the Court and its officers. It is inconceivable that the details of the liquidation proceedings from the Gujarat High Court and the Official Liquidator attached to it are not available with Mr.Vyas. . Be that as it may, I am not inclined to grant any further adjournment. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)