C.Revision No. 32 of 2011. 07.05.2011. Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma,Advocate, vice Mr.N.K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondents No.2 and 3. C.Revision No. 32 of 2011. This revision petition has been directed against the order dated 12.01.2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chamba, on the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, filed in Civil Suit No. 70/2010. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the said suit the respondent No.1 has prayed directions against respondents 2 and 3 for restoring electricity connection in the premises in question over which the respondent No.1 is claiming some right. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already filed a suit for possession against respondent No.1 regarding the same premises and that suit is also pending. In the present suit an application has been filed by the petitioner simply on the ground that since in the earlier suit, the petitioner is claiming possession of the suit premises, therefore, the petitioner should be impleaded as party in the present suit. The present suit has been filed by the respondent No.1 against respondents 2 and 3 and it has not been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the present suit any relief has been prayed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner. The petitioner has failed to make out any case for impleading him as party in Civil Suit No. 70/2010. There is no error of jurisdiction in the impugned order. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. CMP No. 220 of 2011 The application infructuous in view of disposal of revision petition. (Kuldip Singh), Judge. May 7, 2011. (krt)