subsIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.464 of 2006 1. Dudh Nath Yadav, son of late Laxman Yadav, resident of Village Bhuli Chakari, P.S. Raghu Nath Pur, P.O. Khujwa, Dist. Siwan. 2. Bishwa Nath Yadav, son of Ram Ekbal Yadav, resident of Village and Post Office- Khujwa, P.S. Raghu Nath Pur, Dist. Siwan. -------- Intervenors/Petitioners Versus 1. Ramdas Gor, son of late Puran Gor. 2. Dhup Nath Gor, son of Ram Tapesha Gor. 3. Shiv Nath Gor, son of Ramdas Gor. All resident of Village Bhuli Chakari, P.S. Raghu Nath Pur, Pokhejwa, P.O. Khujwa, Dist. Siwan. ---------- Plaintiffs/Opposite Parties 4. The State of Bihar through Collector, Siwan, P.O., P.S. & Dist. Siwan. 5. The Collector, Siwan, Dist. Siwan. 6. The Circle Officer, Circle Raghu Nathpur, P.S. Raghu Nathpur, Dist. Siwan. ---------- Defendants/Opposite Parties ----------- 6 30.08.2011 In view of the fact that the civil revision application has been restored today, this Court has also heard counsel for the petitioners on merit. In the considered opinion of this Court, the application, filed by the petitioners under Order-1 Rule-10 C.P.C. for being impleaded as party, was correctly rejected by the Court below, inasmuch as, the title suit, filed by the plaintiff as with regard to seeking declaration of title of land, in question, was being defended by the District Board and other defendants and, 2 therefore, there was no question of the petitioners being added as a party to the suit. The plea that the petitioners wanted to sub-serve the public interest will have no meaning in law, inasmuch as, the said suit was not filed in representative capacity. If the petitioners have any grievance of his own, they can definitely file their own independent suit but, there would be no question of their being impleaded as parties in the suit, in hand. This Court, therefore, does not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order and this civil Revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)