IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.870 of 2008 ANAND MAHTO Versus SMT. KIRAN KUMARI DEVI & ORS ----------- 3 3.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that by the impugned order directing the petitioner to lead evidence first, the court below in fact has shifted onus on the petitioner. From a bare perusal of the impugned order it would be absolutely clear that what has been decided by the court below in the impugned order who among the defendants has to lead evidence first after completion of evidence of the plaintiff. Nothing has been decided beyond that and therefore, such apprehension of the petitioner with regard to onus is absolutely misconceived. With the aforesaid observations, this application is dismissed. shahid (Mihir kumar Jha,J)