IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2576 of 2010 VIKASH JEE @ VIKASH BHUIYAN @ KRISHNA BHUIYAN Son of Mahangu Bhuiyan, resident of Village-Kevala Kala Tola Julmadih, P.S. Dumaria, District-Gaya............................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 03.02.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 452,380, 436 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but thereafter he was named in the further statement of the informant without explanation as to why initially he had not named the petitioner, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 05.08.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Dumaria P.S. Case No. 24 of 2009 subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and(iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police 2 papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. It has been fairly submitted that the petitioner is an accused in some other cases and there is likelihood of being him implicated further. So, I direct that the petitioner should report to the Superintendent of Police, Gaya, with a copy of the present order within 15 days of his release from jail custody. He shall attend the office of the Superintendent of Police, Gaya, every two weeks and his conduct will be kept under watch for the next six months and if it is found wanting in any manner a report about the same will be made by the Superintendent of Police to the court concerned, who will then initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail. U.K. (Anjana Prakash,J)