IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44092 of 2009 1. PAVITAR MAHTO 2. SATYA PRAKASH MAHTO ----------------Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. As submitted, a case is lodged at petitioners’ hand also against the informant party for incident of the same day. Both the allegations were investigated by the I.O. in which allegation leveled from petitioners’ side was found true only. A recommendation was made by the I.O. to file a case under sections 182 and 211 IPC for false prosecution even then cognizance is taken and petitioners are apprehending their arrest though only non-bailable offence was under section 380 IPC. In the facts of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Runnisaidpur P.S.Case No. 94/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)