IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION N0. 5vi( /2005 /APPLICANT Kejuram Sinha, aged about 55 yyears, son of Shri Ledgaram Sinha, Candidate (Looser), Ward No. 22, Ward Meniber, Electoral symbols - Indian National Congress, "Haath Ka Panja" resident of Gaya Nagar, Durg, Tah. And Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS NQN-APPLICANTS .*' <>^' ^^/ ?1^/ «<"^ <t\^' ^" rf"' B.L. Agrawal, District Collector and Returnkig Officer, Nagar Palik Nigam, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam Durg, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Mandawi, Naib Tahsildar, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Smt Bhulan Bai, wife of Rakesh Kuinar Gupta, Councfflor Ward No.2, Rajeev Nagar, Durg, Nagar Palik Nigam Durg Distt. Durg (CG) /" Anand Kumar Yadav, son of Not known, Independent Candidate, Ward No.2, resident of Rajeev nagar, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 6. ^•~ Raman Lal Dewangan, son of Dashrath Lal Dewangan, Independent Candidate, Ward No.2 resident of Rajeev Nagar, Durg (CG) J- Loknath Sahu, son of Not known, Independent Candidate, Ward No.2, resident of Rajeev Nagar, Durg, Distt. Diirg (Chhattisgarh) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 441-F f2) OF THE CHHATTISGARH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1956 vjCT|iyi«iri^,w-^ww, firtif-iax WH^lfRW <"• ^.W^ .^/^s— 3(I^9TV (ijclijd.d) / sn^sTwfericR aairsn^OTd'tfici) B^tTW^feTMI^ST wals urosecutlon None for the parti^ Once fhe case w^ day, but for waiit of prosecut] passed over. Now, the case h| appears for tlie appUcaiif. The revision is di^ applicaat.. <pi<i(CT<S1i*ii*ffflT^fe'<9 '(["it^;i'< iR3iKl*i3ii^?r •s. called out during the course of the on behalf of tb.e applicaiit, it was is beeu caUed out again, but none laissed for want of appearauce of the Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge i^