IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 925 of 2008 Kamal Padalia @ Kanti Ballabh Padalia S/o Late Prem Ballabah Padalia ……..Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …….. Respondents Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate assisted by Mr. C.S. Dumka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Breif Holder for the State. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate assisted by Mr. C.S. Dumka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. After due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; averments made against the petitioner in the F.I.R.; the fact the F.I.R. prima-facie discloses cognizable offence against the present petitioner; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. Consequently, the CLMA No. 7822 of 2008 also stands dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 23.12.2008 Shiv