IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 866 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34125/2009 Dated 27/05/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- K.NARAYANI AMMA,AGED 85 YEARS, W/O.LATE M.C.RAYARAPPAN NAMBIAR, KARANANKOOTTATH, ERUVESSY P.O., CHEMPERI (VIA), KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.V.C.JAMES, SRI.M.A.FIROZ. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- SRI.R.K.SINGH, IAS, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, (FFP DIVISION), LOK NAYAK BHAVAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI - 001. BY SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA, BY ADV. SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss COC.NO.866/2011 S APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX.1: COPY OF THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT FORWARDED TO THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AS PER COMMUNICATION NO.14904/FFP/A1/2002/GAD DTD. 7/06/2003. ANNEX.II: COPY OF JUDGMENT DTD. 27/05/2010 IN WP(C) NO.34125/2009 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. ANNEX.III: COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DTD. 7/06/2010 OF ANNEX.II JUDGMENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Con. Case (C) No.866 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner complains of non-compliance with the directions in Annexure II judgment. In Annexure II judgment, I directed the respondent herein to consider the recommendation of the State Government and to pass appropriate orders under the Swathanthratha Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The counsel for the petitioner submits that an order has been served on the counsel for the petitioner today only. Therefore, admittedly there is delay in complying with the directions in the judgment. For driving the petitioner to file this Contempt Case, to get a judgment of this Court implemented, the respondent has to pay costs to the petitioner. Accordingly, while closing the Contempt of Court Case, I direct the Con. Case (C) No.866 of 2011 -2- respondent to pay costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the petitioner within three weeks. The said costs shall not be debited to the exchequer and the same shall be out of the pocket of the respondent personally and if he does not pay the same within three weeks, the same shall be recovered from his salary and paid to the petitioner within another month. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/