1 CRA No.255/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLN.NO.255 OF 2011 KAMAR ALI SHAH MAHBOB ALIL SHAH AND ANR VERSUS MOHD ABDUL GAFFAR AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.PV Mandlik, Sr.Counsel h/for Mr. Gandhi Amol S. & Mr.Afzal Hussain Mr.PR Katneshwarkar, Adv. For Resp.Nos.1 to 13; Mr.SS Bora, Adv. For Resp.No.14; Mr.MBW Khan, Adv. For Resp.no.15 ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2) In this Civil Revision Application, it seems the translation placed on record did not depict correct version of the document. Consequently, the plaintiff desired to produce correct translation. Incidentally, learned Presiding Officer, Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, is also well-versed to read original document which is in Urdu. The production sought of corrected translated copy was to facilitate the advocates/litigants, consequently, no prejudice 2 CRA No.255/2011 would be caused, if it is taken on record, even during the evidence of plaintiff or at the stage of cross-examination of the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff/revision applicant to pay costs of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees two thousand) to respondent nos. 1 to 13 collectively. 3) The Civil Revision Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/