SCA/3309/1998 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3309 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KS JHAVERI ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== GHANSYAMSINH TAKHATSINH SOLANKI - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MRS DT SHAH for Petitioner No(s).: 1. M/S PATEL ADVOCATES for Respondent No(s).: 1,2. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 3. ================================================================== CORAM : HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KS JHAVERI Date : 18/07/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT . 1. The petitioner by way of this petition has prayed for the following reliefs:- (A) to issue writ of writs, in the nature of mandamus and/or prohibition and/or any SCA/3309/1998 2/2 JUDGMENT other writ or writs or orders or directions' (B) to direct the respondents to pay the benefit of resolution dated 17.10.1988 and 10.11.1997 of minimum time scale of Rs.750/- + D.A. + Medical Allowance + H.R.A., etc., with benefit of Public Holiday and ear leave to the petitioner from 1.1.1993 onwards; (C) to direct the respondents to treat the petitioner as the employee governed under Resolution dated 17.10.1988 and 10.11.1997; (D) to direct the respondents to pay the difference of wages to the petitioner with other monetary and non monetary benefits from 1.1.1993 onwards till the date of payment as if the petitioner is eligible to get the same' (E) ....... (F) ....... 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the Full Bench Decision of this Court in the case of Gujarat F.P.G.& F.W. Union v. State of Gujarat reported in 2004 (2) G.L.R. p. 1488, the aforesaid reliefs cannot be granted. Hence, the petition stands disposed of. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief if any, stands vacated. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/