IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12742 of 2009 KUMARI HEMLATA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 7.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners who are Anganbadi Sevikas are before this Court with an apprehension for termination of their services allegedly on a grievance raised by respondent nos. 15 to 18 who were stated to be unsuccessful candidates. The apprehension is based on letter dated 16.7.09 from the Office of the Lokayukt at Anenxure- 5. The order directs a final decision to be taken with regard to the selections made. No writ petition can lie on mere apprehension which may or may not turn out to be true. This Court can not issue any writs on apprehensions. It is only if events have taken a conclusive turn which leads to only one conclusion. can apprehension form a cause of action before a writ Court. Such is not the case presently. All that the order dated 16.7.09 directs is that appropriate action be taken in accordance with law. A Division Bench of this Court in 2004(2) PLJR 833 has held that Anganbadi Sevikas cannot be removed from service without issuance of a formal show cause notice and consideration of the cause shown. 2 The order dated 16.7.09 has therefore now to be processed and proceeded with in accordance with the law laid down by the Division Bench and any action contrary to the same shall be invalid in law. The writ application stands disposed off with the aforesaid observations. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)