IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.844 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 29.04.2011. Vipin Kumar ....................Petitioner v. Chandigarh Administration and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Ms.Ritu Punj,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Karan Sharma,Advocate for Mr.Sanjay Kaushal,Advocate for respondent no.1-UT Chd. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) CM No.11135-CII/2011. Instant application under Section 151 CPC has been filed by the petitioner for withdrawing the revision petition bearing NO.844 of 2011, fixed for 30.5.2011 on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. The revision petition No.844/2011 is directed against the order dated 4.1.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh whereby in appeal the order dated 4.5.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)Chandigarh under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC granting temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner was set aside and the appeal was allowed. Plaintiff/petitioner Vipin Kumar had filed a suit for declaration that he was exclusively running the business of sale of IMPF, beer and scotch in the premises/shop no.89, Sector 46- C,Chandigarh and Krishan Kumar, defendant no.2 had no concern with the licence granted with the consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant no.2-Krishan Kumar from claiming any right on the basis of licence granted in favour of the plaintiff for the year 2009-10 and for further mandatory injunction directing the Chandigarh Administration to renew his licence for the year 2010-11. Alongwith the suit an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC for grant of temporary injunction was filed. Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) granted injunction vide order dated 4.5.2010 in favour of the plaintiff/petitioner. Against the order dated 4.5.2010 two appeals were filed one by Chandigarh Administration-defendant no.1 and the other by Krishan Kumar- defendant no.2. Both the appeals were decided by the learned Additional District Judge vide common order dated 4.1.2011, whereby the appeals were allowed and the order dated 4.5.2010 was set aside and the application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff/petitioner was dismissed. Notice of the application. Mr.Karan Sharma, Advocate who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of Chandigarh Administration-respondent no.1. He has no objection if the Civil Revision bearing No.844 of 2011 which is fixed for 30.5.2011 is taken up today and dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the agreed stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, the miscellaneous application is allowed and CR No.844 of 2011 is dismissed as withdrawn. 29.04.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge