IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.1655 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.08.2011. Sunil Kumar ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1 – State. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) This revision is directed against the order dated April 16th, 2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Sirsa, whereby, he dismissed the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail filed by the complainant in case bearing First Information Report No.149 dated October 3rd, 2008 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code registered in Police Station Nathusari Chopta against respondents No.2 and 3. 2. Cancellation of bail has been sought on the ground that the accused threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. 3. There is no evidence worth the name to prove that the petitioner was ever threatened by respondents No.2 and 3. Had it been so, he could very well initiate the proceedings against them in accordance with law. 4. In view of this, the petition is devoid of merit and is, therefore, dismissed. 10.08.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) neetu JUDGE