IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2341 of 2010 ALOK KUMAR, S/o Sri Krishnandan Prasad. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2761 of 2010 RAJU KUMAR SINGH @ RAVI KUMAR, S/o Sri Nagendra Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.3381 of 2010 SHYAM KUMAR, S/o Sri Upendra Prasad Singh @ Upendra Pd. Sinha. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 419, 420 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant in the course of investigating into the fraudulent withdrawals from bank accounts through ATMs stumbled upon one Krishan Murari Parmar with cheque of one Raju Kumar Singh and on inquiry Krishan Murari Parmar disclosed that he was an LIC agent and Raju Kumar Singh had given him a cheque for deposit in his account. The said Raju Kumar Singh had been introduced to him through his cousin brother Shyam Kumar. The trail led to one - 2 - Alok Kumar who stated that one Akash had told him to operate two bank accounts and withdraw money from them for which he would be getting half of the amount. This further led to the officials of Union Bank who stated that certain persons on the pretext of being higher officials of the bank had induced some persons to deposit money in the two accounts being effectively operated by Alok Kumar. However, the submission is that no complaint has been filed by any of the persons who had been induced to deposit money in these two suspected accounts and therefore no offence whatsoever is made out against the present petitioners. Taking into consideration the aforementioned facts as also that they have no similar kind of case pending against them, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 171 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit - 3 - giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)