IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CIVIL CONTEMPT NO. 117 OF 2008 Lajpat Rai Kapoor ….Petitioner. Versus Dharamveer Singh ..Contemnor/Respondent. Present: Ms. Indu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Ms. Indu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioner along with other persons had filed a writ petition being Writ Petition No. 685 of 2005 (MS), in which the following order was passed:- “Heard Sri Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel who accepts notice for respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. The writ petition is admitted. Issue notice to respondent nos. 5, 6 and 7, returnable at an early date. The respondents may file counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List thereafter. CLM Stay Application no. 3732/05:- Heard. Until further orders of this Court parties shall maintain status-quo in respect of the property in dispute. Application is disposed of accordingly.” Now the petitioner contends that the order of status quo has been violated, inasmuch as, the name of the petitioner has not been recorded in the revenue records. This contention of the petitioner is wholly misplaced, inasmuch as, there is no positive direction of the Court directing the revenue authorities to take any such positive steps as is being contemplated. 2 In the counter affidavit filed by the State, it has been stated that the order has not been violated and the status quo still remains. In view of the above, this Court is of clear opinion that there is no contempt made out, as has been alleged. The contempt petition is wholly frivolous and is hereby dismissed. Notices are also discharged. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 6.1.2011 Rathour