IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25995 of 2009 FUL KUMARI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 08/ 31.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Ful Kumari Devi and learned counsel for opposite party no.2 Umesh Sharma. This petition has been filed by petitioner Ful Kumari Devi for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to her husband Umesh Sharma (opposite party no.2) and his parents (opposite party nos.3 and 4) by this court vide order dated 02.06.2008 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21096 of 2008. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner Ful Kumari Devi that she had instituted a Complaint Case No.3181 of 2007 against opposite party nos.2 to 4 for offences punishable under sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code as well as sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but by order dated 02.06.2008 passed in Cr.Misc. No.21096 of 2008 the said accused persons were directed to be enlarged on bail on their submission that they were ready to keep her with them as legally wedded wife of Umesh Sharma with due dignity, affection, care and security but they were never ready and willing to keep her with them and they had been treating her cruelly and hence this petition has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos.2 to 4. On several previous occasions this court as well as learned counsel for both the parties tried their best so that the dispute between the said wife and husband may be resolved, but 2 all the efforts became futile. On 17.02.2010 the petitioner as well as her husband (opposite party no.2) stated that they were ready and willing to live together in the house of opposite party no.2 peacefully and affectionately without creating any problem for each other and hence realising a bright chance of compromise between both the sides, the petitioner was permitted to go along with opposite party no.2 to his house and report after a month to this court about the developments and accordingly the case was directed to be listed on 31.03.2010. Today the petitioner Ful Kumari Devi as well as opposite party no.2 Umesh Sharma are present in court. The petitioner states that she had gone to the house of opposite party no.2 but there she was ill-treated and it was apparent that opposite party nos.2 to 4 were not ready and willing to keep her with them. On the other hand, opposite party no.2 states that he and his parents were throughout ready and willing to keep the petitioner with them peacefully as legally wedded wife of opposite party no.2 as per their undertaking given before this court on 02.06.2008 in Cr.Misc.No.21096 of 2008, but the petitioner herself was not ready and willing to live there and was threatening to teach them a lesson. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it transpires that there is no chance of compromise between the said parties and hence there is no point in continuing with this petition as there are oral statements of both parties with respect to compliance of order 3 of this court dated 02.06.2008 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21096 of 2008. It may further be noted that no case has been lodged by the petitioner against her husband, namely opposite party no.2 with regard to any offence committed by him during the pendency of this petition. In the said circumstances, this court does not find any reason to interfere with the order of this court dated 02.06.2008 passed in Cr.Misc.No.21096 of 2008. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )