IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.18687 OF 2009 TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE Between: Yeppa Prabhakar .... Petitioner. And: The District Panchayat Officer, Sangareddy, Medak District and 3 others ....Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.18687 OF 2009 ORDER: The matter is coming up for admission. Heard the counsel for both sides. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not granting permission in pursuance of application dated 7.7.2008 made by the petitioner for constructionof building in the petitioner’s land situated in Survey No.599/A2/2 in an extent of 0.07½ guntas of Gajwal village and Mandal, Medak District as illegal, arbitrary and pass such suitable orders. It is stated that the petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.0.07½ guntas by virtue of registered sale deed vide document No.3677 of 2008, dated 11.6.2008. It is further stated that the petitioner submitted an application dated 7.7.2008 to the 3rd respondent for grant of permission for construction of R.C.C. building. The 3rd respondent gave an endorsement dated 19.7.2008 on the application made by the petitioner to the effect that the same would be considered during the next meeting of the Gram Panchayat. It is also stated that the 1st respondent issued a Memo dated 26.03.2009 to the effect that a civil suit is pending in O.S.No.111 of 2008 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge Court, Siddipet, Medak District between Sri Khaja Virasat Ali and Gande Yadagiri with regard to some boundary dispute in between them. It is also stated that the petitioner again made a representation to the 1st respondent on 21.8.2009 and requested for grant of building permission in pursuance of his application dated 7.7.2008. But however, the respondents have not considered the application of the petitioner in accordance with law. Certain further facts also had narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. It is stated that the writ petitioner filed a representation dated 21.08.2009 submitted to the 1st respondent. It is no doubt brought to the notice of this Court that the Gram Panchayat is the competent authority to consider the application of the petitioner for granting building permission. Further it is stated that the Surpanch enimically disposed of the writ petitioner. Be that as it may. Inasmuch as the representation, in detail dated 21.08.2009 had been made to the 1st respondent, let the 1st respondent look into the grievance of the petitioner, as reflected in the representation dated 21.08.2009, and dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. The Writ Petition, is disposed of, accordingly. No order as to costs. _______________ P.S.NARAYANA, J September 08, 2009 GK. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.18687 OF 2009 DATE:08.09.2009 GK.