ii i" f !:'^;~^^;f-li :1 iLfc BSIxi^o c / ^. 00 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI3GARH AT BILASPUR. W.P. N0.4-S-.Z3 /2005 PETITIONER S3. ^K ..-• ^..^^.... •Os'''.'i^T' ^<.^^>>' ^.^"<>vs' 'st',^^" <r.^''' ^ESPONDENTS ^\* .-^•-^"11%!1 •' ' ^ ^6,1 1Q \& ^MS^ ./A "rf^ K« ffl; jp r:^ ..-^^ ^: Bc. Ajay Kumar Sinha, s/o abrl V. P.sinha, aged about 38 years, r/o ^ratappur Road, Godhanpur, Anb.i.kapur, Distri.et surguja, C.G, VER S O S 1. 'Bia State of Cbhattlsgarh, through Secretary, Department of Higher Educatlon D.K.s. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. /^2. The Comm.tssioner, Department of Higher Education, Government Science College Campus, Ralpur, C.G. 'iT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^^. -^'. ..'• f'^i ^ -••',. .^- /,<<% /c ^t< °^.5>s XI-HC-78 'j-cc) -yiAllri^, u-alt-i'is, RrtK'iy L^s.f.t^i. ^/X-2-3/ 0<,' *11*1<41 ^mq? •••••••••••••••• an^ST traq? (yit^isj.s) SiI^STWR'fi'b aansii^?rgnrt<i> gRlIliR-HlSd 3II^?T *ii|fd4t'l *1WriT^ffe(StitMI'«l'< ^aif^tiOT^?! vr 8.11.2005 Petitiouer by Shri A. K. Respondents by Shri ^f Advocate wifh Shri Pankaj Heard. Pt-asad1, Advocate. .V.S. Moorfhy, Deputy Goi/t. rastava, Panel laiwyer. Shrivastava The present petition seel^ effect that the respondents be| those candidates who have pasjs year 1993 and the persons w^ic fliesis OQ or before 31.12.2002 s dircction of this Court to ttie directed to give preference to ^ed fheir M. Phil degree by fhe tio have subinitted their Ph.D. Uke fhe persons who have [etitioner has further sought a passed fheir NET/SLET. The ^etitioner direction fhat 25 marks be awferded to those candidates who have passed tlieir M.Phil degre|i have subinitted their Ph.D. fhe' |e by 31.12.1993 or fhose who tis on orbefore 31.12.2002. Shri Moorthy appearin; that the respondents wiU. as per fhe aotification dated under;- for fhe respoadents subiuits consifler fhe cases of the candidates |lst July, 2002 which reads as ^ XI-HC-78 *11*1c91^*TT^ vjTyq^l^lrtAl, UlTn'(-f<10, fcirtl'dyt ^s-^3^or 3ii^?T ^ra^ (>jciijej<d) Elli 3iI^?TW R-li4> aaiTSII^STSFWR NET shall remain\ appoinimerd as Lectur^ Ph. D. degree. Hoiveve\ completed M.Phil degree submMed Ph-D'. thesis id subject on or befqre 31^\ from appearing in the candidates fail to obtain pass the JfET examinafiolji.. Sliri Moorfhy also paragraph 10 of fheir retui'4 Aer subii|iitted that the respondents iu have ah-eady laentioned as under: - °10. That neass^ Uchcha Shiksha Seva N\ incorporaie in ihe Note 1\ nlles that ''Firsl ofatt coi) application ofthe NET/S\ who hcaie submitted/<\ December 2002 or M.\ December 1993. In cd candidates the applicati^ considered". Afeo, 2S merit nu\ candidates who have fl <(>l<<fn<i)l *l!initfls'<l •iluii-ci'i ;R3lf^II3iI^?I \the com.pulsofy requirement for eren for candidates havrng [, the candidate who have ]jy 31st December, 1993 or have the univeTsity in the concemed December, 2002 are exempted rET' examination. In case such Ph.D. degree, they shaV have to ary amendjnent in the C. G. yam, 2002 are being made io ofihe am.end.ment 2005 ofthe sideration shall be jnade on ihe ,ET passed candjdates or those .warded Ph.D. prior fo 31st Phil awarded prior io 31st se of non-availability of such ns of other candidates shall be •rks shall also be awarded to een awarded/submitted PH.D. 7-T XI-HC-78 WR^T^'TT^ vS-uci •^WM<A, V>^S\W[S, KfAWy. ^j-^s/ "r 3IT^?Tq^? (ijclfjcj^i) SiI^STq'Tfem; asiTsii^?iri>*ii* /fw^' ^ f- ' l^,,.^ ^f> '';' ^ "V . ^ \ STOT8RVtf^! SI^W 3- prior to 31st December 2C 31st December 1993 in exemption granted as j Regulation 3002. Howevt entitledfor 10 marksfor f In view of the subinissl Moorthy, nofhing survives in petition is disposed of finatly. N| Certi&ed copy, as per Riit^s. <pl<l(CT<I1i *ii*inV»>'ls'<)''(Ril'l-dl'f ^3tf^T3II^ST |02 or M. Phff awarded prior to Weu of NET/SLET due to the <? •>er the protiisions of U.G.C. •r, such candidates shatt not be h-D. orSmarksforM.Phit' bns as stated above t>y fhis petition. Accorduigly 3 order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge