1 WPNo.371.11 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 371 OF 2011 Mr.Arvind Keru Gavali & ors. ... Petitioners v/s State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.S.Pakale i/by Kirankumar J. Phakade for petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Mr.R.D.Rane for respondent Nos.5 and 6. Ms.Priyadarshini A. Birje for Resp. Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R. Y. GANOO, JJ. DATED: 8TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C.: 1. Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4 on instructions states that the petitioners, except petitioner No.14 has already been appointed according to the merit list. Petitioner No.14, however, has been called upon to comply with formalities of producing proof regarding eligibility and in particular caste claim. Subject to that, even the said 2 WPNo.371.11 petitioner would be issued an appointment order forthwith. The above statement is reiterated by the counsel appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6. 2. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. Mr.Pakale for the petitioners however submits that they would be shown as juniors as per the date of reporting. No such case is specifically stated in the petition. As and when that occasion arises the concerned petitioners would be free to pursue proper remedy in that behalf which will be decided on its own merits. 3. Writ petition disposed of accordingly. ( R. Y. GANOO, J. ) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) 3 WPNo.371.11