With the consent of learned counsei appearing fer the parties, the petiiion is heard §rraiiy. 2) Learned senior counsel appearing for the peiitioners submits that the petition scheduie iand has been aiietteci to the petitioners bye the respondent NM subiect to terms and conditians 0n'5-9-2608 ?6 riaQH QQI§§f§ @F $HH§T?€%£E§H i EEL§$F3~§§ W§§T iFETiTEGN $3 m}. $€$$ G? 2%ii3 1H Nils A‘E Fm Privaié Limited, a campany mcomerated Lander the reiévarii pmvéxgiens of we QQmpames Act, 1356 havmg Et$ Head omce at Agrawa! Bhawan, Vidya Nagar, Biiaspur — 495 001 (CG), through its Director, Mr, Ashok Kumar Agrawai. 2. Ashok Agrawai, aged about 44‘years, $on of iate Jagmohgnda$ Agrawal, lndian Citizen, Shareholder and Director, M/$ AS. Fun Pvt. Ltd., Agrawai Bhawan, Viéya Nag-an Bilaspur {CG}. 9ETEH€3NEE$ § ‘krsw 1. Chhattisgafh Siaié §rxfiustriai RE$P€>N§ENTS Deveicpmsg! Qgrper’aiisn Limited, a publif; Ségcmr undertaking 0f éha State of Chhattisgam and a Gamgany Encarparaiea‘ under ’thé {EQmpanias Ad, 1356 hawing me zegiaiezeri emse at Jeevan Bima Marg, Pandari, Raipur —- 492 G64 {6G}, through Ei§ Managing Eirecior. 2. M/s Grana‘ Motors, a partnership firm, having its principai office, near Tifra Railway Croesing, Biiaspur (CG). (Wrii' petitien under Ariieie 2‘26 0f "i'ne Ceristiiution 9f iriéiia) $irigie Eerie?! : i-ionibie Shri 3aii$h K egnii‘acairé, J. $reeen€ :- Shri Him eradhe, Sr, Adveeaie wiih Shri K. Sharma, Advecate fur ihe petitionere. Nailed, couneei fer ihe reepondent Shri Ayaz i\io.§/CSI§C. €3R£L GQQER A u 9th iPeeeed an u‘iis 1 day or Neeemiser, 2£§$§ v$ (Arme-xure—P/3}. Thereafiér, wrwani m ihe ietter 0f mien? dated, f9-9-2Q08 (Annexure-Pi5) the psaiitioners haw commied wiih aii the reqaii'emeni$ anti deposited the requigiie amount. The ca$e is aenciing consideratien before the ?\./i.aria0§n::i Difectcwr ChE’yaftisgarh €im93 d gt m3 eveiogme % rxrneiaurww i waited frnrshérw‘“i‘SrD Emit n0 a¢ii0n has bean iaken fiii daie Th9 peti‘iimeri- have marie & 2’3—1Gm‘26a8 rémégen'iaiians 0r: 8-16-2f368 {Afméxuré-Pi?) fAm’:§xt9re—PI8). in Learneci counsel appéaiing rm behaif 0f the rESponden‘i No.1/CSIDC submits that ihere is n0 réasorx as it: why perxding repre$eryiaiiori shouid mi be considereé, if: accordance wiih law, as éariy as p0$sibie preferabiy within a period of iwo weeks. 4} in View of the forerioing, according i0 ieamed counsei far ihe , tiiioriers nothing wmaina Inihis‘etitioii far acijudicai'iori. However, i “v d r‘oumai %e:~‘-K$ uberiy io maim an anpiicailon f0? ¢i0pping of ihé aiiagéd cosi$irur3tior1 on tne peiiiion sméduie iand. 5) iiberiy is réséWéci i0 iiie gwiiiiargérg i0 make appmpriaie amiica‘tion beforrh h in Ci a uhariiiesg, if $0 advised. 8) With the aféresaid absei’ilaiions the petiiian Siamjs aiaiygecior Thér p cipniVLiICbi3iJi$ niec CH: censicieri'ne above-stake: repre3$ntati0as of the paiitianers within a period of two w k irom the date nf rereipi of a copy of ihis order in accordance witn iaw, on Its‘own merits. 7) Consequently, i.A.i\io.1/2008 for grani of inierim reiief also etande‘ disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge I Gown 4". ;”’6' " ‘