1 S.B. Civil writ petition No.11567/2009 Gram Panchayat, Jhunta vs Judge, Industrial Disputes Tribunal-cum-Labour Court & Ors. Date of Order dated 13.1.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.SKM Vyas, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to petitioner though award was passed by the labour court in favour of the petitioner on 21st Nov., 2002 directing the petitioner to reinstate the respondent in service and the labour court allowed relief of continuity of service of respondent but when respondent submitted application under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 then by impugned award dated 21st Dec., 2008, the labour court, Jodhpur allowed petitioner the salary of Class IV employee with other monitory benefits. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to fix pay of Rs.600/- per month and not the regular salary of a Class IV employee. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the reasons given in award dated 2 21.12.2002 and relief therein as well as the order passed by the labour court under Section 33C(2) of the Act of 1947 dated 21st Nov., 2009. It is clear from the award dated 21st Nov., 2002 that petitioner was directed to take back in service the respondent and it was ordered that respondent's services shall be treated to be continuous services. In order dated 20th Nov.,2008 labour court held that since the respondent was Class-IV employee, therefore, was entitled to equal salary as is given to Class-IV employee and, thereafter granted, the monitory relief. I do not find that the labour court has committed any error of fact or law in passing the award dated 20th Nov., 2008. Hence, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-