5 ^l^-C ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No &)3.^ / 2011 PETITIONER Chhagan Lal chandrakar S/o Shri G.S. Chandrakar, Aged about 49 years, Occupation - Lecturer, Govt. 1-1. Sec. School Kohka Bhilai Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS .4 ^y ^y<^:.. ^^^nV'" '.-/- pi ' „ ^"r ^M^ ,»-•" •:•'• '>, p?-,'-.-^,','* ' } ' r. /* tTO"^l'e.i.J , "-. \ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (- (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^\ S k3£?,:-Si^ !•; || "^££^-—.9 ;j %, . .1-,? ^-y HIGHCQURTOFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 926 OF 2011 Chhagan Lai Chandrakar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others 2. (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Present;- Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORDER(ORAD (Passed on this 14 day of February, 2011 ) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petltioner is entitled to benefrt of two advance increments on account of the fact that the petitioner has passed B.Ed. examination before entering into the service, at his own cost. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived in the present case is no longer res integra, as the same has beenconsidered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxsna v. State of M.P. & Ors.1 as well as by this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Munidpal Corporaffon, Durg and anothe^ and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Ch.hattisgarh and another3. 4. Learned counse! further submits that the instant petition is squareiy - \\ covered by the decision as aforestated. Thus, the petitioner may \be oermitted to make a reDresentation to decide his case in the ' 2009 (llt) MPJR (SC) 59 22008-{il) MPJR-CG96 3WP(S)No.4130of2005 ^ '^ 6. ^ ? !ight of aforestated decisions, subject to verification of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. certificate on his own expenses before entering into service. Learned counsei appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counset appearing forthe petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ao'.w! Sd//- pr^to»tKlunar Judge ^istaa