IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.06.2010 C.R.No.4949 of 2009 Jaspreet Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ghumand Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. S.S.Salar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.R.Nohria, Advocate, for the respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 17.03.2008, whereby an application for ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit property was dismissed. Such order was affirmed in appeal on 03.08.2009. The said order is also subject matter of challenge in the present revision petition. Defendant No.1 is the father of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is said to be a member of the joint Hindu family, who is owner of the land in dispute. The petitioner alleges that his father defendant No.1 has alienated the property in favour of defendant Nos.2 to 5, who are none else but the other sons of defendant No.1. The petitioner has sought restrain order against further alienating of the property by the defendants. The suit is for declaration in respect of title of the plaintiff over the suit land. In view of the said fact, any alienation of land during the pendency of the suit is hit by the doctrine of lis pendence and will not confer any legal or equitable right in favour of the transferees. C.R.No. 4949 of 2009 In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial Court, which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 30.06.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2