IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56259 of 2007 PRAMOD KUMAR S/O LATE SHEO PRASAD --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHEO PRABAT VISHWAKARMA S/O RAM LAKHAN VISHWAKARMA --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 04 09.09.2010 Petitioner has approached this Court calling in question the order dated 07.02.2007, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna in complaint case no. 1466 C of 2001 whereby his application seeking discharge filed under Section 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was considered and rejected. Aggrieved by the said order petitioner moved learned Sessions Judge in Cr. Rev. no. 129 of 2007 (Pramod Kumar vs. The State of Bihar). Learned revisional Court considered the materials on record and came to the following conclusion in paragraph no. 10:- “10. In my opinion there is sufficient material on the record to frame charge against the petitioner and the learned Magistrate has rightly rejected the petition of the petitioner for discharge. I do not find any legal or jurisdictional error in the impugned order passed by the court below and it is accordingly confirmed.” Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. Submits that pursuant to the order impugned charges have already been framed and trial has commenced in which several witnesses have been examined. This Court finds no merit in the present application, which is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)