IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20807 of 2010 VIKASH KUMAR @ GULLU, Son of Kamal Nayan Sharma, resident of Village- Dihani, P.S. Bihta, District- Patna......................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 23.06.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 29.01.2010 in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that one Chappal was recovered which belonged to the petitioner. The informant has disclosed that the accused persons were naming as Bablu, Kunal and Rakesh whereas the petitioner’s name is Vikash Kumar @ Gullu. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the statement to that effect has been made in paragraph no. 13 of the petition and the Motor Cycle which was seized, the petitioner is the bonafide owner of the said Motor Cycle and father of the petitioner has been forcefully made witness in the said seizure. Learned counsel for the State, however, submits that there are circumstantial evidences against him as Chappal of the petitioner has been recovered. 2 Considering the fact that there is only circumstantial evidence against the petitioner, let the petitioner, Vikash Kumar @ Gullu be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur, Patna, in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 85 of 2009. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)