IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 384 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 63 OF 2008 M/S. DUKLE CONSTRUCTION AND 5 ORS., ... Applicants Versus MR. DOMINGOS ANTONIO MONTEIRO AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. S.D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 30th July, 2010 P.C: Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the Senior Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The respondents have filed their reply and at paragraph 3 thereof they categorically state that they have been and will abide by the order passed by this Hon'ble Court and they shall not park their vehicles in the suit property, nor commit any act, in breach of the order of injunction passed by this Court dated 4.3.2009. 3. The said statement is accepted. 4. The learned counsel for the applicants states that there are some vehicles parked in the suit property, which statement is disputed by the learned Senior Counsel for the respondents. Needless to say that no vehicles can be parked in the suit property. 5. In view of the said statement the application stands disposed of. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-