IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6087 of 2010(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.SANKARANARAYANAN NAIR, S/O.RAVNUNNI NAIR, PACHERY HOUSE, THIRUVEGAPPURA, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, OTTAPPALAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THIRUVEGAPPURA VILLAGE, OTTAPPALAM. **4. THE COMMISSINER BOARD OF LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL 4TH RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 19.03.2010 IN I.A. 3676/2010 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 6087 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated, this the 19th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned proceedings have already been subjected to challenge by filing Ext.P4 Revision Petition before the additional 4th respondent and that the same is pending consideration along with the I.A. for stay filed therewith. 2. After hearing both the sides, this Court finds that the matter could be disposed of without entering into the merits, but for directing the additional 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the statutory Revision Petition as borne by Ext.P4. 3. Accordingly, the additional 4th respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment; of course after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that till such appropriate orders are passed on Ext.P4, all further coercive proceedings stated as being pursued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc