1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Amk SUMMARY SUIT NO. 194 OF 2004 The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. .. Plaintiff Vs. Studio 2100 & Ors. .. Defendants AND SUMMARY SUIT NO. 195 OF 2004 The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. .. Plaintiff Vs. Studio 2100 & Ors. .. Defendants AND SUMMARY SUIT NO. 196 OF 2004 The Kerala Hotels and Resorts Ltd. .. Plaintiff Vs. Studio 2100 & Ors. .. Defendants Mr. Karl Tamboli a/w. Mr. Z. A. K. Najam-es-sani i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Plaintiff. Mr. A. M. Saraogi for Defendant Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : MRS. R. S. DALVI, J. DATE : 15th April, 2010. P.C. 1. The plaintiff has filed three suits for recovery of separate amounts mentioned in the prayer clause of the respective plaint. In the Summons for Judgment taken out in the three suits by a common order the defendant is directed to deposit Rs. 15 lacs. The amount was not 2 deposited. The plaintiff became entitled to obtain an ex- parte decree in each of the suits. 2. In the appeal filed by the defendant, which is rejected, the defendant was granted two weeks additional time to deposit Rs.15 lacs. 3. That time has expired on 13th April, 2009. 4. The plaintiff is entitled to an ex-parte decree in each of the three suits. 5. Mr. Saraogi on behalf of defendant states that the defendant has taken out another Notice of Motion which is not numbered to obtain further time to deposit. 6. Since the plaintiff has become entitled to decree, all the above three suits are decreed as prayed. There shall be 2/3rd refund of Court Fees in each of them. 7. The original document of the plaintiff along with copies of the certain documents by way of secondary evidence are filed in Summary Suit No. 196 of 2004 (R. S. DALVI, J.)