1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 699 of 2007 SURESH KUMAR V/S INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL & ANR. Mr. SANDEEP SHAH for Mr. PRADEEP SHAH, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. MR SINGHVI, for the respondent Date of Order : 18.1.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI DEO NARAYAN THANVI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned Industrial Tribunal by the impugned award while finding the retrenchment to be invalid awarded a compensation of Rs. 10,000/-. That was challenged by the workman by filing a writ petition, and the learned Single Judge by the impugned order enhanced the compensation to Rs. 60,000/- from Rs. 10,000/-. When this appeal was listed for admission on 24.9.2007 referring to the judgment of Jaipur Development Authority Vs. Ram Sahai reported in JT 2006(9) SC-520, it was found that relief of reinstatement cannot be given. Then, the learned counsel submitted, that the appellant has become age barred for any other employment and, therefore, 2 higher compensation may be awarded to him. Precisely for this purpose show cause notice was issued, for considering the question as to whether the amount of compensation ordered to be awarded to the appellant by the learned Single Judge is just or not. In our view, ends of justice would be met if the compensation is further enhanced to Rs. 75,000/- from Rs. 60,000/-. It may be observed here that learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to satisfy that as on the date the appellant has become age barred for seeking any other employment. The appeal is accordingly partly allowed as above. ( DEO NARAYAN THANVI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/