BERGS t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ~2>€-3 ?,/ 2005 R.P.Tiwari. S/o Sbri M.P.Tiwari, /\".-:'t^.--'' .-••'' Aged about 50 .years, 'l'own inspector, P.S.BijapUr, Dist : Dantewada-(C.G-) ^s^ n," .•• f.'l.-'' ..••' /ys^^ .•-A\' ..^ ^•..^. / ' ^^-"' ^-- Kespondents 'versus ./ -A: ^•y- ^ ^i^ ^y ^' f-> 0s ^ ^t>- '>. o- ^'^ State ot Cij.hattisgari'i Through - Secretary Home (Police) Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.). The Director General of Police, Raipur, Dist : Raipur-fC.G.) The Superintendent of Police, Dantewada, Dist: Dantewada-(C.G.) WRIT PE.TITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ffiBB XI-HC-22 3II^?TW R-ii'fisn^r s»i*fi<»>^ilea TS? "i)l<lldi|, ®Tn«'i6,[^owy ii*(<ir *<i«»> 3ll^l M^«h •<r****l**-**t-ti^lt-<*lil«*W^ 200^ {^<><d, 3fi^<i BWKjTtlftiT Heard 5hri Suresh Vermo Shrivastava, Pane! Law'yei is working a^ &istrict-DQntewada, has beenl Ralnsndqaon vide imDugned He turther submits that thouqh] the petitioner hcs not been relii that tihe order ot transter ha^ Drays that .the Detitionsi Dursuance ot the said transfer <i On tha other hand, learnl not in a position to rnaKe any the trcmster order by now. 1 have heard learned have also perus&d the records opinion that this petition can be atthis +i<iff<41-i ii*«i)ffte^t<Ri«i< ^SI^HSTI^T , counss! tor the petitioner and Shri tor the State on advance cooy. he petitioner submits that the own insDsetor' in P.5. Bi.jaour, transterred trom Dantewada to dated 16.10.2004 (Annexure P-1). the order was issued on l6.10.(iOU4. not been yarled or canceiled. He to be relieved in sd State counsel submjts that he is regardinq the existence ot coilirfse tor the Dartles ot ienoth and ot the writ petition. 1 am ot the disposed ot by Dassinq c. conditiona' XI-HC-22 3^ •<ii<iici'si, t9Tfl«'is,I'lcuuy 3ll^l^ia<h II*<CTI snii<n ••••••••••••••••••••• g^ 200 f^^[ 3?I^5TTT R-o'* sn^r shfiti titsa sfi^Kwiwafer ~i.- <tll<ltcf*n-f 11HCTI fflsxfl <RltCK ^srf^ffsn^T s«<i>A V"! 1<^ ihe Detitioner was trl if the imouoned order of tr< and the same !s in existenc^ trom hjs Dfesent Dlace of a oeriod of >J :ertitied copy o1- this order disoosed ot. anstepr&d by order dated 16.10.ii004. mster" has not besn cancelted or varied ;, then the Detitlons" shall be rsiieyed aostlng in oufsuance. ot the imDUQned days from the date of Di'oduction ot setore the comgetent a'-ithority. observations. this ConseauentSv, /A.W.P.i^0.3004/2005 and I.A.No.6882/2005 Certified CODV' as per r] Sd/- SU^KumarS,nh Judge a