IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 290 of 1999 Date of decision: 6th August, 2009 Amar Singh … Petitioner Versus Dildar Singh and another … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) On July 29, 2009, this Court had passed the following order: “In the present case, Case No. 331 dated 9.5.1995 titled as ‘Dildar Singh etc. v. Amar Singh’ was instituted in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ajnala, seeking injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. On 13.6.1995, the trial Court had directed the parties to maintain status quo regarding the suit property. Order dated 13.6.1995 was affirmed by the trial Court on 7.3.1996. Thereafter, the appeal filed was dismissed on 2.12.1998. In the present revision petition also, parties were directed to maintain status quo. A status report be called from the trial Court regarding the outcome of the suit as there is every possibility that by efflux of time, the present revision petition may have rendered infructuous. The Registry may call the report through fax before the next date of hearing. Adjourned to 6.8.2009.” Civil Revision No. 290 of 1999 The Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Ajnala has sent status report, wherein it has been stated that the suit was dismissed as withdrawn on 11th February, 2005. Today, Mr. V.K. Kaushal has caused appearance for the petitioner. He also states that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. As prayed, dismissed, having become infructuous. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 6, 2009 rps 2