IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22005 of 2009 MOST.URMILA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 19.11.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the sister of the informant was poisoned to death in the matrimonial home at the hands of her husband and the present petitioner. It has come during investigation that this petitioner had developed illicit relationship with the husband of the victim. Considering the allegations and the materials available on record as also the facts reflected from the impugned order, this Court is not satisfied that a case for extension of privilege of anticipatory bail is made out. Prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Let petitioner surrender in the Court below and apply for regular bail which shall be considered and disposed of by the Court below on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order passed by this Court in the present proceeding. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)