IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25736 of 2009 1. Randhir Jha, 2. Ranveer Jha, both sons of Shri Keshav Narayan Jha, 3. Keshav Narayan Jha, son of Late Ishwari Jha, 4. Radha Devi, wife of Shri Keshav Narayan Jha, all of Mohalla Chhoti Khanjarpur, Jhauwa Kothi, New Colony, PS Barari, District Bhagalpur – petitioners. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Kumari Abha Rani, daughter of Shri Devendra Nath Jha, Balkrishnanagar, Surkhilal Bhatta Road, PS Barari, District Bhagalpur – opp. parties. … For the petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the S t a t e : Mr. Manish Kumar No.II, A.P.P. For opp. party no. 2: Mr. Amarnath Jha, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocates. 2 23.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. On 24.1.2009 the court below had allowed the informant to produce witnesses on an application filed by her under section 311 of the Cr.P.C. subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/-. Subsequently the court became vacant on 21.2.2009. On 27.3.2009 the informant filed a transfer petition which was allowed and the case was transferred to Shri V.K.Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class. On the next date, i.e. 20.4.2009 an application was filed on behalf of the informant that he is ready to deposit the cost of Rs.1000/- and produce witnesses which was allowed by order, dated 11.5.2009. In the facts of this case I do not think that there is any anomaly in the order and the informant opposite party is directed to produce the witnesses on the next appointed date in the court below failing which the court should close the case and allow the petitioners to produce witnesses or any other witness in their defence. This application is, thus, disposed of. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)