IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15879 of 2009(D) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ KUPPAYANDI PILLAI, S/O.KANTHIMATHI PILLAI, KUNNTHU HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. BY ADVS.MR.DINESH R.SHENOY MR.G.HARIKRISHNAN (TRIPUNITHURA) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ - THE PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, O/O.PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, NORTH PARAVUR. MR. T.A. SHAJI, SC, MUNICIPALITY PARAVUR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.15879 of 2009-D = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT When this case is taken up today, the limited plea on behalf of the petitioner is that the impugned order has fixed a time limit of seven days for demolishing the building in question, while the petitioner has a statutory period of thirty days prescribed for filing the appeal. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is ordered directing that the period of seven days stated in the impugned order will be treated as thirty days, instead of seven days, to enable the petitioner to file appeal and seek interim relief from the Tribunal. All other issues are left open. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/110609