6- (^(t^r/ IN 2HE HIGH OOURT OF JUBIC^TORE CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPyR W.P N035'6,8/2003 / PETITIONER» KESPONDENTSt J^t^ ^ss^ .,-"''.'c^%.^ •^' ^ Manish Kuisar Tripathi S/o Late Sri ®P Tripathi aged abOfat 34 years^ P©stBtearrietad Marwahi ©istt• Bllasptir.Chhattisgarh tVersiis? !• State of Chhattisgarh^ Thr©^gh»Seeretary^ EctacatiOQ jDepartraent Nantralay I2GS Bhawan* Rai@ar(c»G) 2« joiat Dlrector^ Office of Joint Director, Pablic Educatlon Sargiaja Distt. ^ribikaEar(^) 3. Dy» Director^ Ediacation, BaildiBthptar^ Distto Korea " CSbh9l:tisgarh PETITION imDER AKPICE^ 22ife/22<f OF THE gONSTiroTION OF IHDIA —•-'t ~¥ XI-HC-22 3?t^i'^I Rri[oh 3T^T st>^ict> 'yR^ JLk^ (^iVfj J%^ ^^ '3^'?:qT%?R, ^Ttlw«o,fa<rt^y ^w^-^-^^-k5 ^S(H<sf88 ^hHI^ Ect^^ ^ff^i ^ctWi ^r^a 1^< Deshnkukh, mactit>n 11.2.2004 Petitioner by Shri Vinod Respondents by Miss Shamiila The petitioner has preferred th| of India being aggrieved by the macti| petitioner is that he is son of late Shri | No.3 at Baikunthpur on the post of ^ service leaving behind no other D.P.Tripathi is suffering great hardshij B.Sc., M.A. and B. Ed. thereby he is application on 26.12.1997 to fhe foroy^rded the appUcation to the Resp^ Thereafter the petitioner was makmg have not appointed the petitioner, be allowed to make a representation to 1 be directed to dedde the same, to whid Having heard leamed counsel circumstances of the case the petition^ Respondent No.2 within a period of 1| will decide the representation within points raised by the petitioner in tl| accord^nce with the orders, mles and Witfa the above observations Consequendy I.A.No. 102224/^ Parties are entitled for cerrified on^c thib 4»?^{<^^HiHvS ^ Ie^3 <(^^K ^? ^Pd^ 3H^T e^rqmg Res^ondent thoi^h in^ukh, Advocate. 5inghai, Deputy Go^rt. Advocate. |s petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution on the part of the respondents. The case of the |D.P.Tripathi who was working with the Respondent VEead Clerk. He died on 21.11.1997 while he was in family members, therefore family of l^te to maintain itself. The petitioner is educated up]to |ully qualified for the post of Lecturer. He made pxi No.3, for compassionate appointmen^ who ^ndent no.2 vide letter dt. 2.2.1998 (Annexure P/3). rc|presentations to the respondents but the respondents he is fully qualtfied. Therefore/the petitioner may (the Respondent No.2 and the Respondent No.2 may leamed counsel for the State has no objection. |for fhe parties and having regard to the facts and is allowed to make a detailed representation to the days from today and in tum the Respondent No.2 further period of three months considering all the |e representation, by passing SL reasoned order in r^ul^tions relating to compassionate appointment. hi| petition is dlsposed of finally. J003 stands disposed of. - ——— <|opy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^3i