IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9444 of 2007 CHANDESHWAR PANDEY,S/O LATE GAJADHAR PANDEY, R/O VILLAGE-ISMAILCHAK, P.S.- SONEPUR, DISTRICT-SARAN AT CHAPRA. …………………PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM CHAIRMAN COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE, SATAN AT CHAPRA. 3.THE DIRECTOR CUM SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 4.THE COMMISSIONER, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, VISHWARIYA BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 5.DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, SARAN AT CHAPRA. 6.THE ROAD TRANSPORT OFFICER, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SARAN AT CHAPRA. …………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 06.04.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Admittedly the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, where the father of the petitioner was working and whose death has given a cause of action to the petitioner to claim his appointment on compassionate ground is itself in precarious condition. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, is hardly functioning and in fact has not been able to muster sufficient revenue even to pay the salary to its working employees. In such view of the matter, this Court would find it difficult to direct the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation to do the impossible task of employing the petitioner on compassionate ground. Let it Ranjan be noted that the whole matter relating to the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation is sub-judice before the Apex Court which is monitoring the functioning of the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, therefore, this Court would not like to add any financial burden on the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation by asking them to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)