1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.65 of 2006 In Criminal Appeal No.48 of 2006 Ashish Domnic Warawale & anr. Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra Respondents Mr.A.M.Memon for applicants. Ms.A.S.Pai, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. February 08, 2006. P.C. . Heard Mr.Memon, the learned counsel for the applicants who have been convicted and sentenced by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 307, 392 and 394 read with Section 34 of IPC as well as under Section 120-B of IPC in Sessions Case No.112 of 2004. The said order of conviction and sentence has been challenged in Criminal Appeal No.48 of 2006 but belatedly and hence this application for condonation of delay. . As per the office note the appeal is beyond time by 23 days and we are satisfied that the said delay deserved to be condoned. 2 . Hence the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)