IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18206 of 2009 1. RENUKA KUMARI W/O ADITYA KUMAR RAI R/O VILL HARPUR ALOTH, P.S.MUSRI GHARARI, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR I.C.D.S. DIRECTORATE GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. COMMISSIONER DARBHANGA DIVISION , DARBHANGA 5. THE COLLECTOR SAMASTIPUR, DISTT-SAMASTIPUR 6. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER SAMASTIPUR, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR 7. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER SAMASTIPUR(RURAL), DISTT-SAMASTIPUR 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY HARIPUR ALOTH, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR 9. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ HARIPUR ALOTH, DISTT-SAMASTIPUR ----------- 2. 17.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. It is not in controversy that before removal from the post of Anganwari Sewika , show cause notice was issued to the petitioner only whereafter the impugned termination dated 7.6.2007 was passed by the District Magistrate, Samastipur. Her appeal against the same before the Commissioner has also been rejected on 14.9.2007. Relying on 2004(2) PLJR 833 this Court finds no procedural infirmity in the decision making process warranting interference in the writ jurisdiction. However, the supplementary affidavit 2 raises a new ground which is acknowledged not to have been raised either before the District Magistrate or the Commissioner in appeal. It is submitted that certain others, details whereof are mentioned at Paragraph 3 of the supplementary affidavit were likewise shown cause and were removed by order of the same date passed by the District Magistrate but are nonetheless being retained in service. This application is disposed off with the observation that if the petitioner files an application before the District Magistrate alleging hostile discrimination, the same is required to be considered in accordance with law and disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order when appellate order shall not fetter the hands of the District Magistrate to that extent as the Commissioner had no occasion to consider the issue of hostile discrimination. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)