IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14184 of 2008 Between: Mir Akbar Ali S/o. Mir Mohammed Ali R/o.H.No.8-4-369/404, Swaraj Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Inspector of Police, Women Police Station, South Zone, Hyderabad. 2 Smt. Maleka Shahnaz D/o. Shaik Mahaboobn R/o. H.No.20-4-209, Shalibanda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in summoning the petitioner and his family members to the Women Police Station, South Zone, Hyderabad without registering any crime and directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.40,000/- to the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : This Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed alleging that the 1st respondent is frequently summoning the petitioner and his family members to the Women Police Station, South Zone, Hyderbad, without registering any crime and also coercing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.40,000/- to the 2nd respondent, for the purpose of settling the disputes between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent in respect of which a case in Cr.No.236 of 2006 was registered in the 1st respondent Police Station against the petitioner and others under Sections 498-A, 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The first respondent has filed a counter affidavit denying the every allegation in the writ petition. In the circumstances, no further proceedings are warranted. The Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 23.7.2008 cvm