IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 224 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED ROOPCHAND HARIMAL LALVANI Versus KESHAVLAL BAPALAL SWAMI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 224 of 1992 MR RJ OZA for Petitioner No. 1 .......... for Petitioner No. 2-3 MR NILESH A PANDYA for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 02/09/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Oza, learned advocate for the petitioner states that in view of the instructions received by him from his client, he wants permission to withdraw this Civil Revision Application. Copy of the letter received by Mr.Oza from his client is kept on record. 2) Permission to withdraw this Civil Revision Application is granted. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. No costs. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek