IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2008 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1317 of 2008() ------------------------------ C.C.NO.409 OF 2006 ON THE FILE OF THE J.F.C.M-1, MANJERI REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------ REMANI @ ROSAMMA, W/O.JOSEPH AUGUSTINE @ OUSEPH, ADAKKAKUNDU, KARUVARAKUNDU P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED & STATE ---------------------------- 1. JOBY JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH, NHARAKULATH HOUSE, ADAKKAKUNDU, KALIKAVU P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. BEENA, W/O.JOSEPH, NHARAKULATH HOUSE, ADAKKAKUNDU, KALIKAVU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. SOUMYA, D/O.JOSEPH, NHARAKULATH HOUSE, ADAKKAKUNDU, KALIKAVU PO., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVEENDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.1317 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10 th day of June, 2008 ORDER The revision petitioner, who is the de facto complainant in Crime No.45 of 2006 of Kalikavu Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 323 read with 34 IPC, challenges the judgment of acquittal dated 23.01.08 in C.C.No.409 of 2006 on the file of the J.F.C.M-1, Manjeri. 2. The learned Magistrate after a careful evaluation of the oral and documentary evidence came to the conclusion that the prosecution has failed to prove that the accused had voluntarily caused hurt to Pws. 1 and 2, as alleged by the prosecution. That finding is a pure finding of fact based on evidence. This Court sitting in revision will be loathe to interfere with the said finding. I, therefore, find no good ground for admitting the revision. Hence this revision petition is dismissed as in limine. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj