^^&^i^S ;":M^^?=^i? (T_^^^Y ^ -© l^t^j t^ i^^^i°!jf%^ 3l.t BfcS^'IJi'! <0 IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) No. [6-b\ Of2010 I^TEnONERS: y /^\ \^/7 r"^ y^ -^ s y r' 1. H.N. Pandey S/o Late Shri B.P. Pandey, aged about 54 years, presentty posted as Sub Divisioaal Officer, Forest, Narayaapxir, Distdct Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh, R/o Karbala Road, Bilaspur, District BUaspur (CG). 2. Lawrence Ekka S/o Late Shri Hyush Ekka, aged about 54 years, Sub Divisional OfBcer, Forest, posted at Ramanujganj (Surguja )R/o Mahuwa Para, Fundurdihari, Ambikapi.ir, District Surguja (CG). 3. Alok Chaadra Rishi S/o Late Dr. D.P. Rishi, aged about 55 years, Assistant Consenrator of Forest, Depuly Maaager, C.G. State Mmor Forest Produce, CG, R/o Grace Home, Ring Road No.2, Jarhabhata, Bflaspur (CG). f\"^ ^f RESPONDENTS; Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through ffae Secretary, General Admimstration Departtnent, Mntralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). S. The Secretaxy, Forest Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Chhattisgarh, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ~3^ ^Wv^f, VSr{\WI'c, f°1'?1iy^<. ..^..ti)..Mo:..!.&..%!.../..1.o.. T(W? ( •amsn^iwiiw /t- Oeepfi SB^ HQn'ble^SbtLB.anindraNlsh^n Shrn 15-04-2010 Shri Suryakant Mishra, counsel for Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govt copy. Grievance of the petitioner as considering case ftir grant of 4 scate pn whereas ofRcers junior to them namely S been granted this benefit of scate promotii: P-4). Petitioners submit that they are and theyare fully eligible and entitled for been made by the petitioners, frie same hd In ttie petition, it has been stated representation ID respondent authorities representation of petitoner no.1 and In these cireumslances, in the o(\ would be served in issuing direction to nes| ofthe petitioners and take decision thereo| months from the date of receipt of copy cj copy of the petition along with fre^ representation made earlier wthin one m| this Court has not expressed any opinion ( shall take decisfon on petittoners' In view offbregoing, the petitiopjsj entttled petitic|ner represenilatton '^l'itfe'l^i ^T^tf "^ t^St ^N^R ^sffin sii^i astwa..!. (he petitioners. ^dvocate for respondents on advance v^nfilatsd in this petition is that urfiile jimotion, petitioners have been ignored ri S.N.Ojha and Shri L.R.Sahu have )n videorder dated 23/06/09 (Annexure to benefit of time bound promotion fhe same. Though representation has ^ failed to evoke response. jin oath that the petitiQners have made jfor redressal of the grievance though no.3 has been placed on record, iinion of this Court, interest of justice (sondent No.2 to consider the grievance (i by speaking order within a period of 3 this order. Petitioners shall submit a representation in continuation of [>nft from today. tt is made clear that >n the merits of ttiis case. The authority stricfly in accordance with law. pnally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge VltlOl Site tp'nctt', im.l i?IR —FS/I47—2/2010 —1,00,000. ia