INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO."b^Sf-)-/2006 SIN6LEBE PETITIONER ^y^' 'y ^' RESPONDENTS .^^> :?->^.-''' ..••'" ^y' .^ i'S^ Sanjay DubeyS/o Shri Satanand ^ Dubey, Food Inspector, Aged about 45 years, , Food & Civil Supplies, Dharsiva Raipur; R/o Kanchan Ganga Colony, '—~~Phase- Harishc-baadra—Margi,Raipur District-Raipur (CG). Versus 1) 2) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Food & Civi Supplies Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Director-cum-Specia Secretary, Secretary, Food & Civil Supplies Department State of Chhattisgarh, District Raipur (CG) 3) Sharma, Food District-Sarguja Prakash Inspector. ^(CG). WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 3:sg'^ipn?pr, ®Tflyi6,[siMi+iy *\mwt shHich ^).., S-7, Wi[ 200^" 3T1^?TT3?F (l?'3s"i'ir) an^iTqiTRaN) cWT3n^Tst)*li«ti s^iraTnferan^r questic|ned therelfore 6-7-2006 Mr. P. Diwaker, Senior Advoi petitioner. Mr. Satish Supta, fceputy No.l <S 2, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant wnt petition of India, the petitioner has of ths order dated 28-6-2006, whe Inspsctor at Raipur, has been trans Ths main challen9e for tran Bearer of the Association, issued in the year 1994 by the ers not have been transferred; (ii) on| from one district whereas, in thi^ transferred; and (iii) the petitione^ whereas number of persons showl places rangin9 between 10 to 17 yec Learned Senior Counsei for has already made representation, b Therefore, in the first ins' representation to respondent No.l writ petition within o period of 10 d shall decide the repr'esentation o'f ;ate with Mr. Adi! Minhaj, Advocate for the ^ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents <»>i<il<n41-fiiiCTTffte^'<K]t<i< ^ari^iTa.n^r Mnder Aftiels 226/227 of the Constitution the legality, propriety and correctness reby the petitioner, who is working as Food ferred to Rai9arh. ^fer is thot (i) the petitioner is the Office as per the ©overnmentinstructions I'while Stste of Madhya Pradesh, he shouid ^ upto 10% employees can be transferred case, more than 12% officiais have been is working at Raipur since !ast four years, |i in Annexure P-7 are workin9 ot various trs. he petitioner submitted that the petitioner ^it copy of the same is not available. 1-ance, the petitioner is allowed to make a ^aising all his 9rievances along acopy ofthis \if/s from todoy and in turn.respondent No.l the petitioner considering the grievQnces XI-HC-78 *n*R1T 9iW^ 'S^f '^WW'f, Wtfl^'KS, Rldl+t^ __ (^.T.T2.^87/ ^ 200<^ 311^1 yach ('iyi?3<!<S,IST) sn^rwR-fi* tTaiT3I1^Ts»1 Soma ,'^ SRrraTBfer-sfi^r - •i- raised by the petitioner within a p| receipt, in occordance with law. T| decided, he shoutd not be reiieved, i'] With the directions aforesaid Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.No.25p disposed of. Psrties are entitled for certilfied copy of this order. °bi<<rci<fl-< *<iii<iTff fei<fl <Ri+di<. ^Slf^TSlT^T sriod of four weeks from the date of its il! the representatjon of the petitioner is he has already not been relieved. !, the petition stands disposed of. 18/Z006 and I.A.No.6468/2006 also stand Sd^- L.C.Bhsdoo Judge L