1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5970 OF 2009 Vilas S/o.Ramrao Gore PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another RESPONDENTS Mr.S.S.Thite, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.S.V.Kurumkar, learned AGP for respondents. (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 10/09/2009 PER COURT : 1. By this petition, the petitioner questions the issuance of a show cause notice to the petitioner u/s. 45(1) of The Maharashtra Agriculture Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Since the petitioner has already submitted to the jurisdiction of the authorities, according to us no interference is warranted in the exercise of our extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of The Constitution of India. In any event, if any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy available in Law. In the light of that, we are not inclined to interfere in the present petition. We however direct that in the event 2 an order adverse to the interest of the petitioner is passed in the proceedings which is sought to be challenged in this petition, the aforesaid order shall not be given effect for a period of 2 weeks from the date of communication of the order to the petitioner to unable the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available in Law. In the event of application for stay of the said order is moved before the appropriate authority, the authority shall decide the same uninfluenced by the fact that we have directed that the adverse order should not implemented for 15 days. 2. Writ petition is accordingly summarily dismissed with the aforesaid directions with no order as to costs. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/SEP 2009/wp5970-09