(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3018 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3018 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3018 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2941 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.2941 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.2941 OF 2001 Sunil Prabhakar Chavan & Anr ...Applicants Versus Shri. Mukund Pundlik Rasal & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mrs. Nirmala Mangnani, Adv. for the Applicants. Shri. M.S. Karnik, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri. D.A. Dube for Union of India. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicants and Respondents. 2. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out to recall our order dated 24.11.2004 whereby the above petition was dismissed in default. Hence, the Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Place Writ Petition No. 2941 of 2001 on board for final hearing on 21.1.2005.