{1} Cri. Application No.1553/2011+2 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1553 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT VERSUS Vilas s/o Nagnath Khedkar & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.K.Tambe, APP for applicant State Mr. S.J.Salunke, Advocate for original complainant ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 14 th July 2011 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicant State has challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-3 Parbhani, dated 16.12.2010, in Sessions Case No.11/2010 acquitting respondent-accused for an offence punishable u/s 498A, 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. We have heard learned APP for the applicant and we have perused the record and proceedings. Upon such perusal, according to us, this is a fit case for granting leave. Accordingly, {2} Cri. Application No.1553/2011+2 application is allowed. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. Appeal stands admitted. Action u/s 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code, be taken by the trial court, by issuing bailable warrant for Rs. 15,000/- each against respondent-accused. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/B11/criapln1553-11 {3} Cri. Application No.1553/2011+2 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2682 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1553 OF 2011 Murlidhar Bapurao Phatke APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.J.Salunke, Advocate for applicant Mr. S.K.Tambe, APP for State ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 14 th July 2011 PER COURT: 1. By this application, original complainant seeks leave to assist learned Public Prosecutor in the conduct of appeal in this Court. We have heard Shri.Salunke, learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP and for the reasons disclosed in the application, application is allowed and permission, as prayed for, is granted. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/B11/criapln1553-11 {4} Cri. Application No.1553/2011+2 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.214 OF 2011 Murlidhar Bapurao Phatke APPELLANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.J.Salunke, Advocate for appellant Mr. S.K.Tambe, APP for State ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 14 th July 2011 PER COURT: 1. This is an appeal challenging acquittal of the respondents-accused. Since we have already granted leave to the State for filing appeal against the acquittal, this appeal is admitted. Learned APP accepts notice of admission of the appeal on behalf of respondent No.1. This appeal to be heard along with the State appeal. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/B11/criapln1553-11