IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2429 of 2011 RABINDRA KUMAR @ NAVIN KR. SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. There is specific allegation against the petitioner of committing rape on five years old daughter of the informant. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in medical examination no injury was found on the person of the victim and no sign of rape was found on her and, as a matter of fact, the petitioner has been roped in this case on account of previous enmity. It appears from perusal of the case diary that witnesses have supported the prosecution case and some tenderness was found on the private part of the victim. Moreover, in my view, it is not a fit case for grant of bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Kasba P.S. case no.91/2010 corresponding to Sessions trial no.897/2010 pending in the court of Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. I, Purnea stands rejected. However, the trial court is, hereby, directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within nine months from the date of receipt of the order and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)