IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.468 of 2008 SHITAL PODDAR & ANR Versus GANGADHAR PODDAR & ORS ----------- 2. 29.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order appointing a Pleader Commissioner at the request of the defendant opposite party cannot be even said to be deciding any issue and as against such order normally the civil revision could not have been filed. Order 26 Rule 9 C.P.C. gives such power in the court for appointing Pleader Commissioner and that power exercised by the court cannot be said to be jurisdictional error. Mr. Durga Nand Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, however submits that the court below has actually restrained the petitioner plaintiff from entering into the suit premises. In the opinion of this Court there is no such direction in the impugned order. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. This application being misconceived is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/