IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2112 of 2009 RAKESH KUMAR, son of Sri Brahamdeo Roy, resident of Village – Dadri, P.S. - Nanpur, District – Sitamarhi. ________ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Govt. Bihar, Patna. 2. Home Commissioner, Bihar, Patna. 3. D.G. of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. Bihar Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 5. Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna. 6. Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna. ________ Respondents For the petitioner: Mr. Ebrahim Kabir. For the Commission: M/s. P K Shahi, Sr. Advocate, S S Sundaram and Vipin Kumar. For the State: J C to AAG-5. _______ 02. 11.02.2009 Petitioner wants quashing of the final publication of results and the appointment on the post of Sub Inspectors of Police in the State of Bihar as well as the stay of annexure-6. Submission is that right from the beginning the whole process has not been fair and the present petitioner stands discriminated because of the procedure adopted by the respondents in the process of selection. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not worthy of any consideration for the simple reason that the issue of such recruitments was a subject matter of the dispute when a large number of writ applications had been filed earlier. After a prolonged hearing and deliberations a decision has come to be rendered in the case of Jay Shankar Prasad v. State of Bihar and others, 2008 (4) PLJR 825. The present writ application is yet another effort to somehow derail the final selection which has already been made after - 2 - the decision of the High Court in the case of Jay Shankar Prasad (supra). The writ application has no merit because it will amount to reopen the settled issue afresh. The same is dismissed. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)