IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2008 / 9TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3957 of 2007(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PALAKUZHA PANCHAYAT AYURVEDA PHARMASUITICALS, SAHAKARANA SANGHOM LTD.NO. KVIND (E) 111, KARIMPANA.P.O., PALAKUZHA REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT P.U.BABY. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR (RR), MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.HARISH,SC,KERALA KHADI BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).3957/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 29th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, a Co-operative Society, engaged in the manufacturing of Ayuvedic Medicines, availed a loan from the first respondent, Kerala Khadi and Village Industries Board. Re-payment of the same was defaulted which led to proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act as evidenced by Ext.P1. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.T.A.Unnikrishnan, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent Mr.K.P.Harish and the learned Government Pleader Mr.Mathew George Vadakkel. 3. Mr.Unnikrishnan submits that the petitioner proposes to pay the entire amount as demanded by the first respondent without raising any objection as to the quantum of the said amount, provided some reasonable time is granted. He further submits that generally first respondent affords certain concession to Co-operative W.P.(C).3957/2007 2 Societies and that may be extended in the case of the petitioner also. 4. After hearing the learned counsel on both sides, writ petition is disposed of directing that further proceedings in pursuance of Ext.P1 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of three months from today, provided the petitioner pays the entire amount as demanded by the first respondent either in lump or in instalments, without raising any objection as to the quantum of the demand so made, on or before 31.3.2008. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs