1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3332 OF 2004 Parmeswaran Rajendran Pillai ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Ashish Chandra Rao with Mr. Sanotsh Narwade i/by M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner Mr. Ravindra Lokhande, A.G.P., for the State Mr. S.K. Shinde for the High Court. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO AND R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: JUNE 16, 2010 P.C.:- This was a petition filed not to shift the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal to the Small Causes Court Building Annexe on some floors. 2. A reply was filed by the Registrar General, pointing out that the shifting has been completed, and three Courts are 2 functioning since 5th January, 2004. It is further set out that the Bar Association has not made any serious grievance about the location of the three Courts. It is also pointed out that the administrative decision is that the M.A.C.T. Courts are to be retained at the same place as per the decision of the learned Chief Justice. 3. The issue regarding the location of the Courts is an issue which can be decided by the High Court on its administrative side. The High Court, after considering various aspects, can take a decision. In our opinion, that is in the larger interest of the administration of justice. If the petitioner has still any grievance, it will be open to him to put his grievance addressed to the learned Chief Justice for consideration by the Court. 4. With the observations and opinion, the petition is disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (R.V. MORE, J.)