IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 29928 of 1997 Between: 1 C.Muneppa S/o Muneppa 2 M.Chenagappa S/o Gundappa 3 S.Narayana Reddy S/o Obul Reddy 4. M.Murugesh S/o Pedda Narayanappa. PETITIONERS AND 1 Principle Secretary, Revenue Department Govt of Andhra Pradesh Secretatriat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector,Chittoor, Chittoor Dist 3 The Joint Collector,Chittoor , Chittoor Dist 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor Dist 5 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ganavaram Ganavaram Mandal, Chittoor Dist 6 M.Thippamma W/o Late Rami Reddy T.Kurabarahalli Village,Thippadoddi Post,,Mudigaramagara H/oGadduri Mulbagal Taluqu,Kolar Dist, Karnataka State. 7 A.Chenga Reddy S/o Gangi Reddy J.K.Kothapaelle Village,Gangavaram Mandal, Pathikonda post, Chittoor Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ direction or order preferable in the nature of Certiorari calling for all connected records including the impugned order of the 1st respondent in Memo No. 14856/Asn.4(2)/ dt.09.09.97 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to law. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support there of and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B. Rajendra , Advocate for the Petitioner and of G.P for Revenue for the Respondents 1 to 5 and of Sri K.G. Krishna Murthy, Advocate for the Respondent No.6. ..2 ..2… THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER “The learned Government Pleader for Assignments seeks time to ascertain the information as to whether the then Secretary to the Government had brought to the notice of the Honourble Minister for Revenue, Government of Andhra Pradesh specifically, that the Government does not have the power to entertain the Revision in question, or not. If for any reason, the then Secretary to the Government had failed to bring it to the notice of the Minister concerned, the Government is now directed to show cause as to why costs be not imposed recoverable from the salary and allowances of the individual concerned. Registry is directed to list this writ petition on 12th September, 2007 under the caption’ for judgment .” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 The Principle Secretary, Revenue Department Govt of Andhra Pradesh, Secretatriat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector,Chittoor, Chittoor Dist 3 The Joint Collector,Chittoor , Chittoor Dist 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor Dist 5 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ganavaram Ganavaram Mandal, Chittoor Dist 6 M.Thippamma W/o Late Rami Reddy T.Kurabarahalli Village,Thippadoddi Post,,Mudigaramagara H/o Gadduri Mulbagal Taluqu,Kolar Dist, Karnataka State. 7 A.Chenga Reddy S/o Gangi Reddy J.K.Kothapaelle Village,Gangavaram Mandal, Pathikonda post, Chittoor Dist. 8. The Registrar, Judicial , High Court of A.P., for kind perusal. 9. The Section Officer, Writ Posting Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 10. One CC to Sri B. Rajendra, Advocate (OPUC) 11. Two CCs to the G.P.for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 12 One spare copy. RV RV Dated 30.8.2007 HIGH COURT NRRJ Dated 29.8.2007 Note: Registry is directed to list this writ petition on 12th September, 2007 under the caption’ for judgment .” ORDER W.P.No. 29928 of 1997 RV Dated 30.8.2007 HIGH COURT NRRJ Dated 29.8.2007 Note: Registry is directed to list this writ petition on 12th September, 2007 under the caption’ for judgment .” ORDER W.P.No. 29928 of 1997