IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9995/2008 {Ramkhiladi Chaturvedi Versus State of Rajasthan & Others} Date of Order :: 15th September, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Malkhan Chaturvedi for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned notice dated 29th August, 2008 issued under Section 91(6) of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the land in dispute over which he has trespassed is a pasture land but he has constructed his house, therefore, some reasonable time may be granted to him to remove his possession. He further submits that he made a representation for regularisation of his land but without considering the same, he is being dispossessed. 4. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and examined the documents annexed with the writ petition. -2- The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that land in dispute is charagah i.e. pasture land. No one can even acquire the khatedari rights over the pasture land. The petitioner has no right whatsoever to get his so-called possession over the pasture land regularised. I do not find any illegality in the impugned notice issued to the petitioner to remove his illegal possession, so as to interfere with the same. So far as grant of time to remove illegal possession is concerned, the petitioner should approach the appropriate authority in this regard. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK