IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9040 of 2011 MOSTT SITA DEVI WIFE OF LATE SONE LAL HARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARBATTI, P.S. VISHVIDHALAYA, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, BHAGALPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BHAGALPUR, BHAGALPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BHAGALPUR. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 19.5.2011. Heard Shri Swapnil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Amish Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.4, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1/State and Smt. Pravina Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3/Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation. The petitioner, in the present writ petition, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of admitted retiral dues under different heads of her husband, who was to retire on 31.5.2004 as Safai Karamchari from Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation, but died on 30.5.2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to file representation before respondent no.2. 2 In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.2/Municipal Commissioner, Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation and respondent no.3/Chief Executive Officer, Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the respondents i.e. respondent nos.2 and 3 are directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, they are required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)