IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 933 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 30/06/2008 in WP NO : 9816 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: K.Ramachander S/o.Kanakaiah presently at Godavarikhani Depot, H.No.9-4-618, Near Millenium Boys Hostel, Sapthagiri Colony, Karimnagar. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Managing Director, Office at R.T.C. Cross Roads, Hyderabad. 2 The Works Manager - I, A.P.S.R.T.C. Zonal Workshops, Karimnagar. 3 The Regional Manager , A.P.S.R.T.C. Karimnagar Region, Karimnagar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MS.R.KAMESWARI Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.P.RAJANI REDDY The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by an order date 30-6-2008 passed in W.P.No. 9816 of 2008, this appeal has been ﬁled by the appellant- employee of APSRTC. For the administrative reasons, the appellant has been transferred from one Zone to another Zone. It is pertinent to note that a criminal case was ﬁled against him in relation to the suicide of an employee of the workshop and he was kept under suspension for some time. He did not have cordial relationship with other employees and, therefore, the respondent-employer was constrained to transfer him on the administrative grounds. Upon hearing the learned Advocates and upon perusal of the impugned order, we do not see any inﬁrmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge and, therefore, in our opinion, the learned Single Judge was right in rejecting the petition. In the course of hearing of the appeal, learned Advocate for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is having some health problem due to damage caused to his spine and for that reason it might not be possible for him to do hard physical work. If it is so, the appellant may make a representation to the respondent-employer with details regarding his ailment with supporting medical evidence and in that event, we hope the respondent-employer shall consider the application of the appellant with due sympathy. In view of the above observation, the appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs. _______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 28th August, 2008. GRR