IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2899 OF 2005 Shri Shivaji Vasant Patil ...Petitioner Versus Sou.Varsha Shivaji Patil & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Kuldeep S.Patil for Petitioner. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 9, 2005. DECEMBER 9, 2005. DECEMBER 9, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. I see no infirmity in the approach adopted by the Courts below. Counsel argues that the amount specified by the Trial Court towards maintenance is excessive. I see no substance in this submission. The gross salary of the Petitioner as found by the Courts below is over Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) and even after : 2 : providing deduction, the Petitioner would get in hand over Rs.7,650/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty). If it is so, the maintenance amount awarded by the Trial Court, having regard to the attending circumstances can be said to be just and proper. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.