IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5332 OF 2008. WRIT PETITION NO. 5332 OF 2008. WRIT PETITION NO. 5332 OF 2008. Kacharu Lahanu Kedar & Ors ..Petitioners. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors ..Respondents. Shri Anilkumar Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr A. H. Palkar, A.G.P. for the respondent-State. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: 14. 08. 2008. DATED: 14. 08. 2008. DATED: 14. 08. 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. Perused the Petition. 2. Having seen the enquiry report dated 29.6.2006 under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act the inferences drawn are prima facie, unsustainable in law. As a matter of fact, inferences drawn are prima facie perverse. In this view of the matter, if second enquiry is ordered, no fault can be found. The persons facing enquiry cannot be said that they would be prejudiced because of the second enquiry report. Needless to mention that the outcome of the second enquiry as on date cannot be prejudged. ( 2 ) 3. Looking to the amount involved and prima facie material available on record and showing non compliance of the provisions of the Act, while making deposit of Shriram Co-operative Bank, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is dismissed in limini, with no order as to costs. (V (V (V.C.DAGA DAGA DAGA, J.)