1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NOS.12985/2010; 12986/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4188/2009. (Maroti Gangadhar Sakhre Vs. Pradeep Basaji Gaikwad and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.AV Patil, Adv. for applicant; Mr.PR Katneshwarkar, Adv. for Respondent No.1. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 25 th October, 2010. ... 1) Exhaustive submissions are advanced by both sides. 2) By CA No.12985/2010, the applicant/teacher has urged to direct the respondent/management to comply with the directions of this Court dated 15.06.2010, while entertaining the relief of management (Disha Kendra) to pay entire amount of back wages from the date of dismissal of the employee, dated 12.03.2007 till the date of order of the School Tribunal dated 29.01.2009. The other compliances are also indicated. 3) The grievance of the applicant/teacher is, these directions are not adhered to by the writ petitioner/management in its letter and spirit. 2 4) Mr.Katneshwarkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner/management emphasized and supported the calculations carried by the management/petitioner. However, I find, the directions of this Court, referred to above, will have to be read in juxtaposition to the directions issued by the learned Presiding Officer, School Tribunal. No further dissection to both the orders is warranted. 5) Since Mr.Katneshwarkar has questioned the legitimacy of the calculations carried by the applicant/teacher, it would be better if the writ petitioner/management get such calculations in tune with the orders of the School Tribunal and this Court, confirmed from the concerned Education Officer and to tender a chart to that effect before this court before the next date. Hence, following order - 6) The writ petitioner/management shall approach the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Nanded to get correct calculations of eligibility of the applicant/teacher, which will be in tune with the directions of the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal and of this Court;This exercise to be done within two weeks from today. 7) After such certification from the Education Officer, the 3 petitioner/management will ensure to deposit such of the amount in this Court. 8) From the deposited amount in this Court, an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees one lakh and fifty thousand) be paid over to the applicant/teacher – Marothi Gangadhar Sakhre, on his furnishing surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar of this Court. 9) The aforesaid exercise to be carried out within a period of six weeks from today. 10)CA No.12985/2010 disposed of as above. 11)CA No.12986/2010 is not pressed as the very advertisement issued by the writ petitioner/management specifies that the appointment will be subject to outcome of the writ petition. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/--043