IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 35627 of 2010(C) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SMT.M.V.RATHIDEVI,MADAPPILLIL HOUSE, DEVIKULAM, PIN 685 613,(ASSISTANT SALES WOMAN, THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, TALUK DEPOT,MUNNAR, PIN 685 612) BY ADV. SRI.T.R.RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL MANAGER,THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, KOTTAYAM 686 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT MANAGER, THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, TALUK DEPOT, MUNNAR, PIN 685 612. ADV. SHRI N.D.PREMACHANDRAN,SC,SUPPLYCO FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 35627 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF ORDER NO.M5-01/2009 DATED 12.02.2009 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD 4.11.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD 4.11.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITINER BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNNAR. EXT.P4: COPY OF ORDER NO.E1-5/10 DTD 27.11.2010 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE PETITION DTD 28.11.2010 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R1. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE VISITING REMARKS OF THE MUNNAR DEPOT DTD 15.05.2009 OF THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.35627 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is an Assistant Sales Woman in the Munnar depot of the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation. She has filed this writ petition challenging the order transferring the petitioner from Munnar to Nedumkandam. The respondents have filed their counter affidavit stating the circumstances under which the petitioner had to be transferred from the Munnar office for maintaining the discipline and decorum of the office. I do not propose to narrate the conduct mentioned in the counter affidavit in this judgment, since the petitioner now confines her prayer for a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. I have heard both sides. I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd