IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2009 / 11TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18455 of 2009(B) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. K.A.VARGHESE,S/O.ANTONY, KUMBALAMTHANAM HOUSE,KATTAPPANA. 2. C.D.SOMAN,S/O.DAMODARAN NAIR, CHERUPURATH HOUSE, 20 ACRE,KATTAPPANA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. KATTAPPANA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,KATTAPPANA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THOMAS @ TOMY, CHEERAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KATTAPPANA. 3. PHILOMINA @ LILLY, CHEERAMKUNNEL HOUSE, KATTAPPANA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.18455 of 2009-B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P4, a statutory order issued by the Grama Panchayat Secretary in relation to the grant/refusal of building permit. That is an issue that has to be adjudicated in appeal/revision before the competent authority. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the said order has been issued without dealing with one of the aspects stated in Ext.P2 judgment of this Court. In fact, that judgment was only one which required expeditious consideration and disposal of the matter. That, by itself, does not provide cause of action for the petitioners to seek redressal in writ jurisdiction, by-passing the adequate efficacious alternate remedy which is available WP(C)18455/09 -: 2 :- under the statute. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed, without prejudice. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/070709