IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15926 of 2007 Inamul Haque, son of Late Ramzan Ali, Resident of Village-Rampur, Kesariya, District-East Champaran. ………….. Petitioner. VERSUS 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The B.N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura through is Registrar. 3. The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura. 4. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura. 5. The Controller of Examination, B.N. Mandal University, Lalu Nagar, Madhepura. 6. The Managing Committee of Millia Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad B.Ed. Teachers Training College, Lalbagh, Purnea. ………. Respondents. ----------- 04 17.02.2009 The petitioner had come to this Court for declaration of his results of B.Ed., for which examination was conducted by the B.N. Mandal University for the Session 1995-96. A reference to Annexures 4, 5 and 5 A would show that petitioner was fully aware that in the Tabulation Register (T.R.) marks in several subjects were given except in Paper IIIrd , where he was shown absent, it is because of this reason marks sheet was not issued. In the counter affidavit filed today University has shown the marks for Paper IIIrd. They have stated that answer book is not available and as such petitioner was given average marks which comes to 44 in respect of Paper IIIrd but still he has failed because in Paper IVth as rightly recorded he had secured only 25 marks and as such irrespective of the marks of Paper IIIrd he would have failed in any case. I am surprised at the attitude of the petitioner. Once petitioner knew his marks because he categorically states in all his 2 communications that in Paper IIIrd he has been shown absent, as per Tabulation Register (T.R.), he knew that he had failed in Paper IVth, which included entry in Paper IVth, he had failed so whatever be result in Paper IIIrd. Whether he was rightly or wrongly shown absent he had failed over all. Even if he has given 100% marks in Paper IIIrd the result would not have changed he would have failed. Results have now been declared no further grievance is left. The writ petition is disposed of as such. The consequence of petitioner failing he has to reappear in the examination to get the said degree. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)