IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22037 of 2011 1. Amal Kumar Son Of Raj Kishore Singh Resident Of Fardo Gola, Rewa Road, Bhagwanpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur 2. Pankaj Kumar Anand Son Of Dr. Sachchida Nand Prasad Singh Resident Of Villaege And P.O. Deoria , P.S. Deoria, District - Muzaffarpur 3. Priyanka Kumari Daughter Of Raj Kishore Singh Resident Of Shiv Nagar, Fardo Gola, Rewa Road, Bhagwanpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District Muzaffarpur 4. Miki Kumari Wife Of Prashant Kumar Resident Of Shastri Nagar, Bibiganj , Bhagwanpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur 5. Amit Kumar Son Of Raj Kishore Singh Resident Of Shiv Nagar, Fardo Gola, Rewa Road, Bhagwanpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur Sadar, District Muzaffarpur 6. Rajesh Singh Son Of Ramchandra Singh Resident Of Village And P.O. Deoria, P.S Deoria, Districtmuzaffarpur-----------------------Petitioners. Versus 1. The Bihar Sanskrit Shikha Board, Bihar, Patna Through Ths Secretary 2. The Chairman, The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary, The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna -------------------Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 14.12.2011 The case of the petitioners is that after completing the course of Secondary Examination, 2011, they submitted their examination forms with requisite fee to the Respondent Board for their appearance in the examination which were accepted by the Board. The petitioners appeared in the examination and all of them have received lesser marks in several subjects. According to them, they have made applications, which are Annexures-1 series, on 27.9.2011 mentioning the subjects in which they have received lesser marks and have paid requisite fee for re-evaluation of the marks but however, the same were not complied by the respondents and are still pending. Having heard the parties, this Court is of the opinion 2 that it would suffice if a direction is issued to the respondent no.3 to dispose of their applications dated 27.9.2011 in accordance with law. With the above observation this writ petition is disposed of. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.)