IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 11383 of 2009 Between: Abdul Khaleel S/o. Late Abdul Sattar D.No. 5-89, Upstairs, Behind Lubaly Dargah, Kurnool. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank Rep. by its Chairman Head Office: P.B. No.65, Kadapa - 516 001. 2 The Senior Manager cum Enquiry Officer Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank Regional Office: Krishna Nagar, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring all the proceedings leading upto and including the proceedings No.458/HRD-IR/PP/1064/09 dt. 8-5-2009 of the 1st Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, amounts to victimisation, capricious, bad in law, violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Writ Petition No.11383 of 2009 ORDER: Though the learned counsel for the writ petitioner made an attempt to draw my attention to the contentions canvassed in the writ petition on merits, upon re- consideration, makes a submission that the writ petitioner may be permitted to appropriately submit his submissions in furtherance of the impugned show-cause notice, so as to enable the disciplinary authority to take into consideration and account the further submissions which the writ petitioner intends to make. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel, Ms.Uma, who submits that the disciplinary authority will not be reluctant to entertain any such additional submissions, if the same are made in quick time and they will also be taken into consideration before final orders are passed. If the respondents have not passed any final order so far, they may not pass any final order within next the 15 days time. The writ petitioner may submit his additional submissions on or before 22.06.2009, so that the same may also be taken into consideration and account, while passing the final orders. As requested by this Court, Ms.Uma, learned Standing Counsel, undertakes to convey this order to the disciplinary authority, so that final orders may not be passed pursuant to the impugned show-cause notice immediately. With this, the writ petition stands dismissed. The order of dismissal shall not be construed as expressing any opinion on the merits canvassed in the writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J Dt.11.06.2009. VGB