IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16948 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- D.RAJASANKARAN, S/O. K.DAMODARAN 'RANJINI' J.N.ROAD, POERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. R.RAMADAS RESPONDENTS: --------------- THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (WORKS CONTRACT AND LUXURY TAXES, MALAPPURAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No. 16948 of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 02nd day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved of the demand made by the respondent, particularly as per Ext.P10, directing the petitioner to satisfy a total liability of Rs.7,43,237/- towards the balance amount of tax as well as interest, which according to the petitioner is not correct or sustainable. 2. The case of the petitioner is that, huge amounts are liable to be repaid by the respondent by way of refund, on finalization of the assessment proceedings, particularly as revealed from Ext.P4, wherein an excess tax of Rs.1,24,226/- was paid by the petitioner, which has been ordered to be given credit to, in respect of the assessment year 2001-'02. Ext.P5 reveals that, the liability of the petitioner in respect of the assessment year 2001-'02 is 'Nil'. In Ext.P7, it is stated that there is an excess payment of Rs.1,10,246/-. Over and above these, reference is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to Ext.P10 itself, whereby the amount due in respect of year 2005-'06 has been shown as Rs.2,28,978/-, whereas the amount paid by the petitioner is given as Rs.5,05,405/-, thus showing substantial excess payment. It is without any regard to the said amounts to be refunded to the petitioner, that the respondent has chosen to realize the interest W.P. (C) No. 16948 of 2010 : 2 : from the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, there is no amount liable to be paid by the petitioner under any circumstances and the petitioner has preferred Exts. P12 to P14 petitions for rectification, which are stated as pending before the respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without finalizing the said proceedings, the respondent is proceeding against the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent is directed to consider Exts.P12 to P14 petitions for rectification and pass orders in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear, till such final orders are passed on Exts.P12 to P14, all further proceedings, pursuant to Ext.P10, shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd