(1) wp7252-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7252 OF 2009 Dilip s/o Sonu Shewale & others PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. M.A. Thorbole, advocate holding for Mr. P.R. Patil, advocate for the respondent No. 5. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 2nd AUGUST, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. The petitioners are Retailers who claim that manufacturers are enjoying `unjust enrichment' because the Retailers have been forced to pay octroi although the Maximum Retail Price (M.R.P.) consisted of a component of octroi which the manufacturers obtain from the customers. An affidavit has been filed by the State indicating that the M.R.P. includes the octroi. It has also mentioned the manner in which the M.R.P. is fixed. 2. In our opinion, this petition is not (2) wp7252-09 maintainable as the grievance of the petitioners is against the manufacturers indulging in `unjust enrichment' and not against either the State or the Municipal Corporation. The petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] npj/wp7252-09