ssp 1 WP 424 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2011 Rajesh J. Masurkar .....Petitioner versus Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.S.S.Redekar, for the petitioner. Mr.Milind More, AGP, for the respondent-State. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATE: 20 th OCTOBER, 2011 P.C. 1. The above petition takes exception to the order dated 25-09-2009 passed by the High Power Committee, whereby the High Power Committee has observed that the petitioner has failed to point out the cause of action against which the petitioner has approached the High Power Committee. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that initially the name of the petitioner was not appearing in Annexure II. Thereafter, the petitioner’s name is included in Annexure II. Taking into consideration the said fact, in our view, the High Power Committee was right in observing that the cause of action against which the petitioner has approached, cannot be deciphered from the application. In that view of the matter, no case for interference in invoking the writ jurisdiction is ssp 2 WP 424 of 2011 made out. If the petitioner in future, has any grievance in connection with the implementation of the said scheme, he can approach the concerned authority. If the petitioner approaches, needless to state that the authority concerned may consider the application/representation of the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law. 2. In view of what has been stated above, the writ petition to stand disposed of. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )