IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No. 69 of 2008. Decided on 6th January, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Dharam Pal Pun. ….Petitioner. -Versus- Gurcharan Singh Puniah and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. K.D. Sood and Mr. Rajnish K. Lall, Advocates. For the respondents. : Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. K.D. Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the petitioner is permitted to retain the demised premises till the building plans are duly sanctioned, he has instructions not to press this petition. 2. Mr. Satyen Vaidya, learned counsel for respondents fairly submits that the petitioner/tenant shall not be evicted till the building plans are duly approved in accordance with law. 3. Consequently, in view discussion/observations made hereinabove, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/landlords not to evict the petitioner till the building plans are duly approved. It is also agreed between the parties that the use and occupation 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? charges will be `500/- per month. This amount shall be paid by the tenant regularly to the landlords. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge January 06, 2011. (bhupender)