B IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.'"7,^ Lf ^, /2011 PETITIONER /^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Meera Bhargav, W/o. Late Shri N.P. Bhargav, Aged about 50 years, Occupation-Housewife R/o. Rajkishore Nagar, Near SBI Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Health 8s Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.^ The Finance Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Chief Medical 85 Health 3'. 4. 5; 6'./ Officer, Bilaspur (C.G). The Block Medical Officer, Coramunity Health Centre, Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) The Director, Health Services, Raipur (C.G.). The Accountant General, Pagaria Complex, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 '3?ni?r ^r t^^ri^" wiia^rwtT -^- ^"T -4i<)i<n^, ©flly'Ko,fsioiK-iy .11.^.1.... SII^T •q?R7 (•ipi^q^i;!) t^ITWWinStI^I 28.6.2011 Mr. Ashok kumar 8 Ms. SunitaJain, Pan^l With the consent ofl petition is heard finatly. Leamed counsel matter m.ay be referred to ap^earing for fhe parties submit tKat the the Pension Comruittee. Nb filcts This Court, in V/.P.I State of Chhattisgarh 8s dfa-ected the Committee to| the disputed question of constituted by the State G^ 19-06-2006 passed in Cfusidrakar Vs. State Goi and order dated 13-3-2008 (State of Chhattisgarh a^id another). Thus, tfais petiti(|>n and order dated 31st JanuArv [(Baijnafh Mandal (suprajj] appearing for the parties. 4>!'4fd4i'1 1TR??! ^* feE^t •CM^.K ^aifipTsn^r kla, counsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State, on advance copy. leamed counsel for the parties, .fhe ).4642/2004 [Baynath Mandal Vs. Tf-w fpthers) and other connected matters; lconsider the matter of retrial dues as were involved. The Coiumittee was j>veminent, pursuant to the order dated [W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bdi [lemment of Chhattisgarh and othersi, passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and is squarely covered by the jiidgment r, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642/2004 as submitted bv leamed coiuisel 7)l'^:.''.s^:;',^-i;:^?',;?l ^ XI-HC—78 SlRff qiT R-li* W SW^V shli* Praveen 'S'-SI "41^1d-4, 8itl1<-l'l6, rsj<'ll+flj,< ^?l-q^r(' TOiiw^fean^i 'L This petition is acc4 terms i.e., the ofnce offhe case to the Committee, wit? receipt of a copy of this issue notice to fhe petiti|i further period of 15 days. order, in accordance wifh 1{ hearing to the petitioner. Tpie may ffle additional docum|i includtng payment of reti|ral completed within a period of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall to fhe State counsel as well for fransfemng the same t4 tt)1^^4t-! ^W^ ^f fe%t <f^-fc$K ^; sifw sn^r rdingly finaUy disposed of in fhe same \dvocate General is directed to send the tiin a period of 15 days from fhe date ol irder. Thereafter, fhe Committee shall sner and oflicers concemed withia a The Committee shall consider and pass a.w, after affording proper opportimity of petitioner and the officers cdncemed ents, if neGessary. The entire exercise, dues, if any, to the petitioner, be rfthree months from the date ofreceipt supply one complete set of tlie petition as counsel for the Accoiintant General the Committee. Sd/- : ManindraMohanShrivastava; Judge