THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.806 of 2002 DATED: 15-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner- complainant, questioning the order, dated 11-04-2000, passed in P.R.C.No.8 of 2000 by the learned I Additional Munsif Magistrate, Gurazala. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner herein gave a complaint against the respondents 1 to 5 herein-accused, alleging offences punishable under Sections 354 and 323 IPC and the same was taken on file as P.R.C.No.8 of 2000 and the learned Magistrate dismissed the same. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner herein preferred the present revision. 3. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 4. In my considered view, this revision is not maintainable for all purposes. It is a judgment of acquittal and when once a judgment of acquittal is passed, the only remedy left open to the petitioner is to file an appeal against the order of acquittal, as provided for under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C., but not a revision invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. For this reason, this Court finds no merits in this revision. 5. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 15th July, 2010. Tsy