IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26571 of 2010 MAULI YADAV, SON OF ASSO YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 29.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. By an order dated 6.8.2010, the matter was posted after one month with the obvious intent to grant bail to the petitioner on the said date. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of A.D.J.-I, Barh, Distt. Patna, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 709 of 2010 arising out of Ghosawari P.S. Case 46 of 2002 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and 2 thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)