IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9903 of 2010 Date of decision: 08.02.2011 Veena Rani ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. Sidrath Sarup, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Mr. Sidrath Sarup, DAG, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Ved Parkash, states that all the accused, including the petitioner have since been acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Kaithal on 07.10.2010. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 08.02.2011 mohan