IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9200 of 2010 Yashpal Gulati .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. John Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. S.S. Dalal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled to serve upto age of 60 years on account of the fact that he is suffering from disability of 70%. The petitioner had submitted himself before the Medical Board constituted by the P.G.I. Rohtak on more than one occasion, but no report has been furnished. As per the requirement of law, this report is essential requirement for grant of extension. The petitioner has already retired in September, 2010. Let the petitioner obtain the report from P.G.I. Rohtak about his disability, for which he has already appeared. If the petitioner makes an application in this regard, the PGI Rohtak will submit the medical report. In case, the petitioner is needed for further medical examination, he may be so informed. If as per the report, the petitioner is found to be suffering from the extent of disability, which would entitle him to serve upto 60 years, he may approach this Court again. The writ petition, at this stage, is disposed of as per the above direction. April 20, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE