1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7398 OF 2005 Shri Sidheshwar Shikshan & Krida Mandal, Brahmapuri ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... None for the Petitioner. Mr.V.P.Malvankar, AGP for the State. ... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND F.I.REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. J. J. 16th January, 2006. P.C. : 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. In similar other matters which have come up before us, our attention was drawn to the orders passed by the Apex Court in S.L.Ps. protecting the 2 possession of Zunka Bhakar holders. Considering that the Petition is disposed of by issuing the following directions : The possession of the Petitioner is protected pending the disposal of the S.L.P. before the Apex Court. The possession of the Petitioner be subject to the order passed by the Apex Court. If the Apex Court holds against the Appellant before it, the same order will also cover the present Petitioner herein who will surrender possession in favour of the Respondents. Rule made absolutely accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)