IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.9445 of 2011 Date of decision : 26.5.2011 Som Parkash ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Randhir Sharma Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner makes a grievance of the promotions of private respondents who were promoted prior to the year 2001. He has made a grouse of this belatedly in 2011 by filing the instant writ petition. The plea of the petitioner that the loss is recurring cannot be accepted as he has suffered the consequences of this action of the respondents which he alleges to be erroneous for the last 10 years. The legal notice also was served in 2010 much belatedly and thus I am of the opinion that the writ petition is hit by delay and latches. Consequently, there is no ground to interfere. Dismissed. 26.5.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss