1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.920 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.919 OF 2010 (Terna Shetkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs. Suresh s/o Limba Jadhav & Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 15 th June, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr. KB Jadhav, Advocate h/for Mr. SB Ghute, learned Counsel for the applicant; Mr. PS Chavan, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 and Mr. SD Kaldate, learned APP for Respondent No. 2-State. 2) This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of six days’ delay caused in filing the accompanying application, seeking leave to file an appeal against the Judgment and order of acquittal of the respondent no.1 (original accused) dated 17.11.2009 passed by 2nd J.M.F.C. Osmanabad in S.C.C.No.1815/2003 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3) It appears that from the reasons mentioned in the application, that the 2 applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the said delay of six days is not willful, deliberate and intentional and certainly it is not inordinate and, therefore, the present application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. 4) In the result, the present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) thereof and delay of six days, caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file an appeal, is condoned and the present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P.DAVARE) JUDGE bdv/p/cran920.10