IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1428/2008 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Poonmaram & Anr. 09.04.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri Pritam Bijlani, for the appellant. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. I have perused the impugned award dated 15.2.2008. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the learned Commissioner while assessing the compensation has taken the disability as 80% while the claimant himself has admitted that he can drive the vehicle even now and possessing a driving license for the same. Learned counsel for the appellant was fair enough to supply the copy of the statement of the claimant and his cross examination thereon. I have perused the said statement The claimant in his statement no doubt has admitted that he can drive the vehicle. But at the same time the claimant has further clarified in the cross examination that he maintain the driving license only on account of the fact that some time he may be required to drive the vehicle, though in his examination-in-chief he stated that he cannot now perform the duties of a driver. Thus the statement has to be read in its entirety and no portion can be taken in isolation. The learned Commissioner has thus not committed any illegality in determining the amount of the compensation which is just in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 1976 ACJ page 141. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal as well as the stay application are accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS