FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.7538 OF 2004 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Ms.R.C.Nichani for the petitioners. Mr.R.A.Thorat for respondent nos.1 and 2A. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 4TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 4TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 4TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: . Ms.Nichani, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this petition on merits and submits that in view of the findings recorded by the courts below on the point of possession it may be observed that the petitioners’ possession shall not be disturbed by the respondents without following due process of law. Mr.Thorat, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2A fairly stated that the respondent nos.1 and 2A shall not disturbed the petitioners’ possession without following due process of law. He further submits that in fact respondent nos.1 and 2A have already initiated the proceedings before the appropriate court and are following due process of law for getting back possession of the suit premises. In the circumstances this petition is disposed of as not pressed. It is made clear that the petitioners’ possession shall not be disturbed by the respondents without following due process of law. This order is without prejudice to the rights of the parties as may be available in law. The writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)