1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3352 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. N O. 5738 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 18 th JUNE, 2010 1 Heard Shri A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant. None present for the respondent though served. 2 There is delay of 770 days in filing the appeal. It is stated that after decision by the Jt. Civil Judge, Sr.Dn., Aurangabad on 30-11-2007, Regular Civil Appeal no. 95/2008 was filed in the District Court, Aurangabad within limitation. However, on scrutiny it was found that the claim of the respondent was above Rs.2,00,000/- and therefore, appeal was required to be filed in this court. In the circumstances, appeal was withdrawn on 26-11-2009 and was filed in this court. 2 Considering the reasons given, in my opinion, delay can be condoned under section 14 of the Limitation Act. Hence, application is allowed. Delay condoned. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb / office /ca3352.10.odt 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 5738 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 18 th JUNE, 2010 . Heard Shri A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant. . Admit. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb / office /ca3352.10.odt