IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 931 of 2010 Date of decision:- 10.8.2010 Amrit Pal Singh and others ......petitioners vs. Mr. M.S. Sandhu, Principal Secretary ......respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab for respondent.s HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) This Court vide order dated 10.12.2009, directed the respondents to consider the petitioners for promotion from the date his juniors were promoted and grant consequential benefits. In pursuance of such direction, reply has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and it has been found that petitioner No. 1 does not meet the required bench mark for promotion whereas the petitioners No. 2 and 3 have been promoted w.e.f. 30.5.2008. Learned Counsel for the respondent states that the order in respect of pay fixation shall be passed within a period of two months. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is dismissed as having been rendered infrucutous. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 10.8.2010 preeti