IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 76 OF 2006 THE ELECON CONSTRUCTION ....Petitioner PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI JOSEPH MATHEW, MARGAO GOA. Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS ....Respondents SECRETARY(POWER) AND 3 ORS., Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. K. Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 27th February, 2006 P.C. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already been supplied with the tender documents. He, therefore, craves leave to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the points raised in the petition. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.