IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.3592 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.05.2011 Gian Chand . . .Petitioner Versus Amritpal Kaur . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Achin Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) CM No.14185-CII-2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. CR No.3592 of 2011 (O&M) This revision petition is directed against order dated 16.5.2011 by which Rent Controller assessed the provisional rent which is ordered to be paid on 14.6.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the landlord has not brought any evidence on record to show that he has not paid the rent from 1.2.2004. He further submits that it is impossible that the landlord would keep quiet for such a long time if the rent is not paid to him. Be that as it may, the fact remains that there is no evidence brought on record by the tenant to prove that he has paid the rent upto 30.9.2010. This is all matter of evidence which shall be decided by the Court when the same is led before it. At this stage, Court has rightly held that the tenant is liable to pay the provisional rent for the period 1.2.2004 to 30.9.2010. Needless to say that after evidence is led and the Court comes to a conclusion that the landlord has claimed excess rent, the same shall be returned to the tenant, in accordance with law. Revision petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 30, 2011 JUDGE Vivek