•S^S^£S!'K'SS5SSSSWS^^SS^!^S^^:^^S <^f=' ^^L- IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) N0.4-2-E'18 /2006 PETITIONER ...•' .***\^'^» ...../^> .^'t?'-'iy .•••'"" ^y" A^r :^.^ ^ RESPONDENZS .ii^-T^^. ^^^^.. ^. ^—^;-"-^ f ^'/c. ^ \ . % ?"'?!.W t7^-,A A i' II I^M^'^1 ^^,i<—-<y "/~%./^ erg^. •^r'. '^5^»»^- a1;,'&-^ .-t.T^A c^&-'^ t.0 ,-lltf ^v,.'^^us ft.. ij>- : ^ GQVind Ram aged about 42 years, S/o. Raju Ram Nirmalkar Occupation Daily Wages employee Water Resources Department Gariyaband, R/o Panduka ( Gariyaband) Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ^:1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Water Resources Department Mantralaya D.K.S., Bhawan .Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer in chief Water Resourees Department Shihawa Bhawan, Civil Line Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 ^^f^-IRi (ISTT3II^IS5TW •Y. iTTOCTTgOTW 3^H(pn?pr, ^Tny'i^, fadi+iy ^.^.^.M^-^20&£ w^w w* (v^y^) ?^(TW^fer3n^' 11A.2006:. ERrafepftr irrcff if teA T^RCT: ^arf^iTsn^T '< Shri Abhay Tiwari, counsel fc|rthe petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Go|irt. Advocate for the State/respondents^ on advanee copy. l-1eard. The petitioner, who ctaims (o be a daily vrager employee in the Water Resources Department, Gai|iyaband, Panduka has preferred this writ petition questioning his transfer ^rder dated 7-7-2006. The main grievance of the jsetitioner is that he is working as a Copyist, daily wager employee in iPanduka and by the impugned ord [Division. Being a daily wager ei the Water Resources Department at sr he has been transferred to Kanker pployee he cannot be transferred, therefore, the impugned order is perv|erse. Learned- counsel for the Ipetitioner submitted Ihat in the |cireumstances, the petitioner may b^ allowed to make a representation to ^he Chief Engineer, Water Resource4 Department bringing thls anomaly to tis notice and in tum, he be directsdtto decide the same, to ^ich leamed sounsel for respondents has no objecpon. Having heard learned counse) for the parties, having regard to the icts and circumstances of the case| and without expressing any opinion >n the merit of the case, the petiti^ner is allowed to make a detailed (epresentation atong with a copy of|this petition to the ChieT Engineer, /ater Resources Department within ^ period of 10 days from today and in irn, Chief Engineer, Water Resoijrces department shatl decide the ipresentation within a period of 30 (lays from Ihe date of receipt of the r^presentation, after considering all tlfie points raised by the petitipner, in ilccordance w'rth law. P.T.O. •.^.wtssiw^^a^ciSSaasw XI-HC-78 3^ "Mi^ici^, ®T(1^'ie,fsidiuy tfTTipfT a»^T<t» ^ 200 3)1^1 4s<«i (*icl!^sl<<ff) a.n^TT q>T R^jtb (WT3T1^TsbH BTiTrarflfN-w^T +l'i|t<'f'fl-f *11H<'lTffte<^<Rl«;K . ^isri^Tsn^T Barve \^ eSl ?cto~ 4nd In the meantime, the effect resped of the petitioner shail rem^ petitioner is decided. With the direction afbresaid, Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.: Parties are entitled for certifi^d operation of the impugned order in (in stayed, till the representation of the ^he petition stends disposed of. ,$265/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofthisorder, Sdl- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.