IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12195 of 2008(B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ M/S.MANGALY GRANITE PVT. LTD., THATTUPARA, AMALAPURAM, AYYAMPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM DT., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, RENJITH GEORGE. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MOHAMED HASHIM SRI.V.M.SAJAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANGAMALY. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AYYAMPUZHA. 3. BIJU THOTTAKARA, THOTTAKARA VEEDU, AYAMPUZHA P.O., THATTUPARA, ERNAKULAM DT. 4. SHAJU KANNON, KANNOTH VEEDU, AYYAMPUZHA P.O., AMALAPURAM, ERNAKULAM DT. 5. CHACKO PAINADATHU, PAINADATHU HOUSE, AMALAPURAM, AYYAMPUZHA P.O., ERNAKULAM DT. 6. PETER EDAPULAVAN, AMALAPURAM, AYYAMPUZHA P.O., THATTUPARA, ERNAKULAM DT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.Balakrishnan Nair & P.N.Ravindran, JJ. ======================== W.P(C).No.12195 of 2008 ======================== Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner seeks police protection for the smooth functioning of a quarry run by him in R.S.Nos.295/9 and 295/10 of Ayyampuzha Village, Aluva Taluk. According to him, respondents 3 to 6 are causing obstructions to the running of the same. If that be so, the petitioner has an alternate remedy to approach the civil court. This view is supported by the decision of this Court in Thilakan v. Circle Inspector of Police - 2008(1) KLT 141. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner and his right to move other forums for appropriate reliefs. K.Balakrishnan Nair, Judge. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess 15/4