{ 1 } S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6045/2007 KALU RAM SHARMA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF ORDER : 04.09.2009. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Anees Ahmed for Mr. Sanjeet Purohit for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Lohra for the respondents. While exercising powers under Rule 18D(1) of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Workers & Workshop Employees Standing Orders, 1965 Managing Director, Rajathan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur vide order dated 16.10.2001, compulsorily retired the petitioner from services of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation. On 31.05.2004, the petitioner preferred a review petition before His Excellency the Governor of Rajasthan to review his compulsorily retirement made under the order dated 16.10.2001. By this petition for writ, a direction is sought for expeditious disposal of the review petition aforesaid. It is stated by Shri P.K. Lohra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation that as per the relevant Standing Orders, no review petition is maintainable before His Excellency the Governor. { 2 } It is well settled that review is a creation of Statute and review of such an order is impermissible; if Statute do not prescribe to do so. In the instant matter, counsel for the petitioner failed to satisfy the Court regarding maintainability of the review petition before the Governor. An effort is made by counsel for the petitioner for maintaining the review petition as per provisions of Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996, however, those rules are having no application in present controversy as the petitioner was not a civil servant of the State, but an employee of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation. Accordingly, this petition for writ is having no merit, the same is dismissed. It shall be open for the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, if he is having any grievance with the order dated 16.10.2001 by approaching the appropriate forum. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/