1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 185/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1058/2009 (D) Pradip Keshaorao Tikhe ...vs.. Shri Rajgopal Deora, Divl. Commissioner, Amravati and othes =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 23rd November, 2009. Heard Shri S.B.Solat, learned counsel for the petitioner. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner since according to him, respondent has not considered his representation in accordance with the Resolutions, issued by the Government. This court had directed that the representation for transfer of the petitioner be considered and decided within a period of 4 weeks. The petitioner himself has placed on record the order showing that the representation has been decided. The order shows that 2 the name of petitioner appears at Serial No.379 in respect of representations made by those persons, who desired transfer. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal has found that there are many, who have made representation for transfer on same ground prior to petitioner is not entitled to be transferred and has rejected the representation. If the petitioner feels aggrieved thereby, he has liberty to challenge the said order once again. Contempt Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE. Diwale