1 19.wp8062.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8062 OF 2011 Mr. Naresh Thakur & ors. ....Petitioners. Vs. The Hon’ble Minister for Cooperation Mantralaya & ors. ....Respondents Mr. S.M. Sabrad, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- NOVEMBER 16, 2011 P.C. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard Mr. Sabrad, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. In view of the order which is proposed to be passed, service of Rule on Respondent No. 5 is waived. 2. Perused the earlier order dated 20/6/2011 passed in C.A. St. No. 15704 of 2011 in Writ Petition No. 3927 of 2011 as also the order dated 30/9/2011 passed in this Petition. Mr. Sabrad makes a statement on 2 19.wp8062.11 instructions that there is further subsequent development namely Managing Committee Elections have been conducted and the present office bearers who are Petitioners have lost election. Naturally they will have to hand over the charge to the newly elected Managing Committee. However, there is an apprehension about the Administrator taking charge from the Society. It is therefore directed that till disposal of the Revision Application filed by the Petitioners before the State Government, the Administrator shall not take charge from the Petitioners. It is further directed that this will not however operate as a stay in favour of the Petitioners in so far as their obligation to hand over charge of the management to the newly elected Managing Committee is concerned. The newly elected Managing Committee will be handed over charge by the Petitioners without raising any objection or without relying upon this order or the pendency of the Revision Application before the State Government. With the aforesaid clarification rule made partly absolute with no order as to costs. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)