IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 3779 of 2010 Date of decision: 3.3.2010 Sham Lal Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. LS Sidhu, Advocate. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. This order will dispose of three connected petitions filed by Sham Lal (Cr.Misc. M 3779 of 2010), Vijay (Cr.Misc. M 4213 of 2010) and Raju @ Raj Kumar (Cr.Misc. M 4231 of 2010) in case FIR No.22 dated 10.3.2009 u/s 323/341/342/382/506/148/149 IPC registered at P.S. Islamabad, District Amritsar at the instance of Edvin Paul that he was attacked by petitioners and others. So far as Sham Lal petitioner is concerned, he has been attributed a lalkara. He is stated to be incharge of grave yard and has also filed a suit for injunction against the complainant. He is stated to be 90 years of age. So far as Vijay petitioner is concerned, he has not been attributed any injury and so far as Raju @ Raj Kumar is concerned, he has also not been attributed any grievous injury. Two main accused of the petitioners have been arrested and released on regular bail. The petitioners having already joined the investigation, can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. In view of the above, the petitions are allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners, they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that the petitioners will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. The petitioners will not commit the similar offence, of which they are accused of during the pendency of the trial. March 3 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE