1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO: 2988 /2009 (Nitin Madhavbhai Sonu vs. State of Maharashtra ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order Mr Atul Pande, Adv. for applicant Mr Anup Parihar APP for Respondent C ORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 29th August, 2009. Heard. The applicant is seeking bail in connection with Crime No. 277/2009 reported at Bhandara Police Station, for offence punishable under sections 302, read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code as also 3 (2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It appears that earlier, the applicant had moved the learned Sessions Judge, Bhandara who, by order dated 24.7.2009 rejected the bail in Misc. Criminal Application No.151/2009. 2. Learned APP has objected the bail on the ground that investigation is pending; the matter is serious and complicated. The first informant informed about oral dying declaration by her son Sandip Meshram about which the learned Advocate for the applicant contended that FIR was delayed. Be that as it may; considering the circumstances, I think the bail application will have to have to be moved by the applicant after charge- sheet is filed in the present case, in view of the fact that it is a case of homicidal death as the Doctor opined that death was caused due to injury on vital organ i.e.lung with massive haema thorax as also the contusions and abrasions noticed on the body of the deceased, as mentioned in Column No.17 of the PM notes. 3. At present, bail cannot be granted as the investigation is pending 2 into the serious accusations. Application is rejected. The applicant is at liberty to move the trial Court for bail, after charge-sheet is filed. JUDGE. sahare