IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7612 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SURESH SADABHAI PARMAR Versus COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 7612 of 2001 MS R SRIVIDYA for Petitioner No. 1 MR ANMOL SHARON for Petitioner No. 1 Mr. M.R. Mengde, AGP for Respondent No. 1-4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 01/12/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Ms. E. Shailja for the petitioner and Mr. Mengde, learned AGP for the respondents. Learned advocate Ms. Shailja appearing for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the order of appointment issued by the respondents in favour of the petitioner dated 11.11.2003 and has submitted that in light of the said order of appointment, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Copy of the order of appointment of the petitioner dated 11.11.2003 produced by the learned advocate Ms. Shailja is ordered to be taken on record. Considering the fact the grievance of the petitioner has been satisfied in view of the issuance of the order of appointment in favour of the petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for withdrawal of this petition is granted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. It is clarified that the petitioner has withdrawn the present petition in view of the Condition (14) of the order of appointment dated 11.11.2003 that unless and until the present petition is withdrawn by the petitioner, the petitioner will not be permitted to report for duty by the respondents. In view of such condition, the petitioner has withdrawn the present petition. DSP Today. Dt.1.12.2003. (H.K. Rathod,J.) Vyas