IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21355 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.08.2011 Manmeet Singh . . .Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.A.P.S. Deol, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.Ramanjit Singh Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sukant Gupta, Advocate, for UT, Chandigarh. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner is not attributed any overt act which could attract Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. This fact is conceded by learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from ASI Dharambir Singh. He has rather submitted that the petitioner was though present with the other accused but he has neither pushed the complainant nor caused any injury to him. He further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation on 21.7.2011 in terms of order dated 18.7.2011 and is no more required for further investigation. In view thereof, order dated 18.7.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 23, 2011 JUDGE Vivek