IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12541 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- PRINCE KUMAR S/O.LATE MADANAN, AGED 41 YEARS HOUSE NO. C.C.21/308,KANHIRATHINGAL HOUSE PALLURUTHY PO,KOCHI-6 ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU SRI.SURAJ KRISHNA B.S. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE CHENNAM PALLIPURAM GRAMA PANCHYATH R REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PALLIPURAM PO, CHERTHALA TALUK ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. C.K.PRABHAKARAN S/O.CHALIUNKAL THARA KARUMBAN POLEKADAVU-THURUTHELKADAVU ROAD WARD NO.1 PALLIPPURAM PO CHERTHALA TALUK. 3. JIJO, AGED 35 YEARS S/O.THANKAMMA, ULLDANKATTIL HOUSE POLEKADAVU THURUTHELKADAVU ROAD WARD NO.1 PALLIPPURAM PO CHERTHALA TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 12541 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T Inaction on Ext.P2 complaint made by the petitioner is what is complained of. The allegation in Ext.P2 is that respondents 2 and 3 have trespassed into the Panchayat property. 2. If as stated, Ext.P2 has been received and is pending, 1st respondent shall consider the same with notice to respondents 2 and 3 as well. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the allegations raised, and it is entirely for the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp