IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH F.A.O No.1032 of 1998 Date of Decision.09.11.2010 Ashok Gautam son of Shri Ram Chander, resident of WZ-44, Uttam Nagar, Extension, New Delhi ......Appellant Versus Naresh kumar son of Shri Khazan Singh and others ......Respondents 2. FAO No.1033 of 1998 Sube Singh Yadav son of Kalu Ram Yadav resident of D-52, RXH-245 Raj Nagar, Part-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi ......Appellant Versus Naresh kumar son of Shri Khazan Singh and others ......Respondents Present: None for the appellant, Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for the insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the insurance company is present and ready. There is no representation for the appellant. 2. The appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non-prosecution. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 09, 2010 Pankaj*