IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1346 of 2010 LALLAN PRASAD son of Sri Ram Prasad Lal, resident of village Karserua, P.O. and P.S. Darigaon, (Sasaram), Dist. Rohtas…appellant. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 2.The Joint Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Rohtas, (Sasaram), Dist. Rohtas. 4.The Consolidation Officer, Sasaram, Dist. Rohtas 5.Laljit Singh son of Dahin Singh, R/o village karserua, P.O. Darigaon, (Sasaram) P.S. Sasaram, Dist. Rohtas…respondents. ----------- 3 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties at length. Learned counsel for the appellant presses I.A. No. 7601 of 2010, filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of five days in preferring this appeal. It is evident that the delay in filing the appeal is nominal & fit to be condoned. However, we are of the view that the appellant has no case on merits. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that the writ petitioner, who is the appellant herein, had preferred the writ petition against the appellate order who had remanded the matters to the learned first authority. The learned Single Judge up- held the order as a result of which the matter has now to be examined on all issues of laws and facts by the first authority. We agree with the order of the learned Single Judge. Law is well settled that the superior court normally 2 does not interfere with an order of remand because no adverse orders in such cases is passed calling for interference. It goes without saying that it will be open to the parties to raise all issues of laws and facts available to them before the authorities under the Consolidation Act. We do not find any merit in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. (S.K. Katriar, J) M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )