HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION No:14417 OF 1998 Dated: 12.7.2006 Between: 1. A. Ramulu and two others. *W.P. is dismissed as far as 1st petitioner is concerned as per the order dated 9.6.1998 ..Petitioners And 1. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Water supply, Panchayat Raj Department, Karimnagar and others. ..Respondents. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION No:14417 OF 1998 ORDER: When this matter has come up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition insofar as the 1st petitioner is concerned, has already been dismissed vide orders dated 9.6.1998 and insofar as petitioners 2 and 3, there is an interim direction of this Court to consider their cases for allotment of works in accordance with Memo No.87931/RWS.II/89-3, dated 4.10.1990 issued by the Secretary to Government PR & RD department. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the tenure for the execution of the work is only for 1997-98 and the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. The above submission is recorded. In view of the submission made by the learned G.P. and also in view of the fact that the tenure of the work in question is confined to 1997-98, I feel that nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication and as such, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 12th July, 2006 Nn/Gurc. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:744 OF 2005 28.1.2006