IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 241 of 2011 Date of decision: April 07, 2011 Narender Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Saroj Bala and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This petition assails the order dated 6.12.2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sonepat, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the petition was dismissed. After hearing learned counsel for the parties at length, I reach the conclusion that Sushil Kumar against whom the allegations of adultery have been levelled is a necessary party. The trial court appears to have taken wrong view of the matter, therefore, the impugned order deserves to be se aside. Resultantly, this petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the amendment sought for by the petitioner is allowed. April 07, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge