IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18974 of 2010 HARI YADAV @ HIRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The submission of the petitioner under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code is that there is no eye witness to the assault and named. Co- accused Ramdeo Mukhiya has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 44175 of 2007. Learned counsel for the State points out that three beheaded bodies have been recovered. That the petitioner and Ramdeo Mukhiya are both alleged to the member of an unlawful gang with antecedents of six cases. Only to maintain consistency in the orders of this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bairiya (Srinagar) P.S. Case No. 9 of 2001. The photographs and proof of residence of the bailors shall be appended to the bail bonds which shall be verified through the local Police before final 2 acceptance. Both the bailors must be his father and mother respectively. The petitioner is directed to remain physically present on each date till final acceptance of the bail bonds. The petitioner is further directed to remain physically present on each date in the trial unless the court below on an application in its wisdom exempts from such appearance on any single date. Failure to do so, shall entitle the prosecution to move the trial court appropriately to facilitate trial. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)