w lm/A S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT RILASPUR LCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO.[ g 5 L! /201 1. /, PETITIONER: Bisahu Ram Sahu, son of Kartik Ram Sahu, aged about 53 years, working as Upper Division TeacherE-bmy - mm}, Hvah scml M401 Esmct Baloda Bazax (Education), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents 1. /State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawa.n, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. A,,/!A,,, K 2. District Education Officer, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh. /’ 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Rajpur, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WW , A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1554 of 2011 Bisahu Ram Sahu. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri C.J.K.Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for the State/ Respondents. Present: ORDER ORAL (Passed on 22“ day of March, 20-1 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Durg & Another] and Gopesh Kumar Verma v. State Government of Chhattz‘sgarh & Anotherz. He further submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent authorities which may be decided in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents does not controvert the above submission. Shri Gupta further submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law and in the light of the decisions of this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj (supra) and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), as expeditiously as possible. 1n view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. M Mwy / sal- Amit V“ om Judge , srmSH K ANGN‘H W 1 (2006) II MPJR CG 96 2 w.P.(S) No. 4130/2005 PETITIONER /