THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.29229 of 2010 Dated 29th November, 2011 Between: M/s.Sri Gajalakshmi Parboiled Modern Rice Mill and others …Petitioners And Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, rep.by its Chairman and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Kamatham Govardhan Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri P.Sriraghu Ram Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5: Sri O.Manohar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed assailing the order, dated 05.06.2010, of respondent No.1, whereby it has determined Fuel Surcharge Adjustment (FSA) for the financial year 2008-2009. At the hearing, it has come out that a batch of writ petitions, filed raising identical issues and questioning the order of respondent No.1, which is impugned in this writ petition, was disposed of by a learned single Judge of this Court on 29.07.2011 in Indian Cements Ltd. and another vs. Chairman, APSERC, Hyderabad and others[1]. A perusal of the judgment in the aforesaid batch of cases shows that the learned Judge set aside the impugned order of respondent No.1 with liberty to the DISCOMs to file applications afresh, claiming FSA, and directing respondent No.1 to consider and deicide the same in accordance with law, if and when such applications were filed. Having regard to the above judgment, which applies in all fours to this case, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the said judgment and to the extent indicated therein. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.37222 of 2010 and W.V.M.P.No.91 of 2011 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th November, 2011 VGB [1] 2011(5) ALT 188