IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAIKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWD DATED THIS THE 18” DAY OP JULY 2011 BEFORE THE HONELE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO CR1 HNLP1ONNo1%4j91i BETWEEN: Smt. 1<alamma. W/o. Some shekar Harohe1avadi. Age: 46 years, 0cc: Household work. R/o. Yallamma Housing Society Rajatgiri. Dharwad, District Dharwad. ... Petitioner (By Shri P.1K. Sanningammanavar, Advocate) AND: Raveendra. S/o. Hanumanthrao Belamkar, Age: 50 years, Occupation: Proprietor, Sangam Transport, R/o. Sangam Transport. Bankapur Chowk, Hubli, District Dharwad. . . .Respondent This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the order dated 29.07.2010 passed in C.C No.737/2004 by the 11 Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) and III J.M.F.C. Hubli and the order dated 21.03.2011 passed by the 1 Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad sitting at Hubli in Criminal Revision Petition No.119/2010. This criminal petition is coming on for admission, this day the Court made the following: - ORDER This petition is filed seeking to convert the proceedings under 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act from summons procedure to warrant procedure. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to say as to what advantage he is getting in converting the summons case into warrant case. 3. It is seen that the petitioner has approached the Sessions Court in proceedings under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, knowing fully well that an interlocutory order is not revisable. In view of the fact that the petitioner is unable to satisiS’ this Court as to the advantage he would receive in converting a SummonS pr(3edure to warrant procedure. I am of the opinion that this petition is filed for protracting the trial before the learned Magistrate. Hence this petition is dismissed. Sd,’ JUDGE Rsh