IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16080 of 2011 Date of Decision.22.09.2011 Ram Rattan son of Bhajan Lal and others .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana through its Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, Civil Secretariat, Haryana, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the writ petition may be treated as representation and a decision is taken by respondent No.2 within a particular time. 2. The writ petition may be treated as representation. The 2nd respondent will consider the petitioner's claim and take appropriate decision in accordance with law within a period of 8 weeks. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 22, 2011 Pankaj*