IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2010 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9476 of 2010(H) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SUJESH.M.S., SANTHINAGAR, JYOTHIS, S.G.P.(P.O.) SHORNUR-2, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS.MR.T.MADHU SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTARAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9476 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein was a student of Government Engineering College, Sreekrishnapuram for B.Tech Information Technology. The petitioner appeared for the 3rd and 5th semester supplementary examinations in June 2009. When the results of the same were published in February 2010, the petitioner failed in two papers in respect of the 3rd semester examination namely, Engineering Mathematics III (IT 2K 301) and Discrete Computational Structures (IT 2K 303). Exhibit P1 is the application submitted by the petitioner for revaluation of the above subjects. The petitioner also failed in three papers of the 5th semester examination namely, Graph Theory and Combinatorics IT 2K 502), Information Theory and Coding (IT 2K 503) and Digital Data Communication (IT 2K 504). The petitioner submitted an application for revaluation of the said papers also, as per Exhibit P2. W.P.(C) No.9476/2010 2 2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider and take appropriate action on Exhibits P1 and P2 applications for revaluation submitted by the petitioner. It is submitted that unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to complete the process of revaluation. In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation and communicate the results thereof to the petitioner within a period of two months. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp