-VL;-^". -I- ^_________ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAlWATBILASPUR Misc. Appeal So /2004 Appellant Respondent FR*i!?SiO Devanand Pal, S/o Agnu RamW " Aged About 21 Years, R/o Villagfc Seoni, PS Abhanpur Teh. & Distt. Raipur VERSUS ^ 1. KapilKakkad, '' S/oTilakRajKakkad, Aged About 20 Years ;H1 ..yy \.y -2; TilakRajKakkad ^ S/o S.R. Kakkad BothResident of Punjabi Colony Katora Talab Raipur (CG) (^- S.^The National Insurance Company Limited, Through, Divisional Manager, Division OfSce, Mobim Mahal, GE Road, Raipur Teh.A Distt. Raipur (CG) ^>peal U/S 173 of The Mptor Vehicles Act, 1988 For Enhanceaent Of Opmpensa-tion Amount *11tC91 ?SW ^BET <^|l<41rt<4, U-^'<1<I<S, Rrtltl^ .M.A.,.^;3:&i w^zoo^ 3K^?T(R!P ('ilfgffi) sn^T^iR'ii* aairsn^aiFiiw 8TOT«R^lftcT 3II^CT UViaUNyhNUH HWf&EafSAK. PATNftlK <3», &HOMBLE^wswn»lKAiGiUMcnrra. j. 10.08.2005 M.A^to.578of2004 Heard Mr. Raja Shanna, Mr. J. A. Lohani, leamed counsel Rakesh Kumar Jha, teamed Insurance Company. This is an appeal under S^i Act, 1988 for enhancement of dated 07.04.2004 passed by 111 ^ Tribunal, Ralpur in Claim Case Nc|. only a sum of Rs.1,300/- was 4< •favour of the appellant for injuryl appeltant on 09.04.2002. On 18.07.2005 when the the Court was of the opinton pennanent disability after the <;ou(t the order dated 18.07.2005 the open to the respondent No.3 to ofthe appellant, in the meanwhBe. Now an aptriication has has received an offer from respoij to settle the daim of the appellantl at Rs.85,000/- in addftion to the amourt atready/paid to the app^llant pursuant to the impugned award. <bW(ri41'11Wc'(l'^'(sl<9 •<Rntsi\ ^3lf^T3II^?T l^arned counsel for the appellant, for respondents 1 & 2 and Mr. c|ounset for respondent No.3 / i<'ction 173 of the Motpr Vehicles tompensatton agalnst the order ^dditional Motor Accident Claims i.47 of 2002. By the said award ^warded by the said Tribunal in |in the accident suffered by the c^se was listed befbre this CQUrt, t|iat the appellant suffered frbm had a look at the appellant. tn qourt also observed that it will be eikter Into a settlement of the claim be|8n fited by the appellart that he ^dentNo.3 / Insurance Company FS?2005-20;OOQ ^^ "^3 XI-HC-78 •yWftf^ty^i,s ^^^^siitSS< ^Fra%^TR? .M.:.A...S3.S gn^TBT^lici; ?raislTS?T**ii* ~i5 Sarma '-<: *'<'fc" \ .-..chSysts^'.'1 *<iic'l 't'Is^stlnit^p! iia !73W- '"•''""•a^gri^naii^p^^.g;; TI-ie~counsel'Wffie"ippel^ B~ana~responaenf~No73~ao~ra; dispute the fact thatjthe settlemetit has been made betweenthe appellant and responcjent No.3. | j This appeal isj disposed of|witHa direction that r^spondent No.3 shall pay a furt(ier sum of R^.85,000/- to the appell|int within one month from toda^. Theimpug^ed award ofthe Tribunal stands modified accordlngty. | Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge J ' ] Uul QS-30