THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.5124 OF 2011 ORDER: 1 Heard Sri Rajanikanth Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2 A perusal of the report given by the prosecutrix in Cr.No.189 of 2011 would show that it does contain allegations, which attract the offences falling under sections 448, 354 and 509 r/w 34 of IPC. 3 The plea of the petitioners is that there is a property dispute and earlier an incident occurred in which the first petitioner’s wife was assaulted and that was registered as Crime No.188 of 2011 of the above P.S. and the present case is filed only as a counter blast to that. The learned counsel for the petitioners also invited my attention to the relationship between the parties and argued about the improbabilities in the present case. It may be noted that all these aspects pertain to disputed questions of fact and cannot be decided in this petition. Hence, I see no ground to entertain this petition and it is accordingly dismissed. 4 However, with regard to the arrest of the petitioners, and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, which relate to property disputes and the earlier case, the police are directed to keep in view the provisions of Section 41 Cr.P.C. before taking a decision about the arrest of the petitioners. ------------- 06.07.2011 Kvsn