IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4163 of 2010 JAYANT PRASAD SAHA, SON OF LATE RAJENDRA LAL SAHA, RESIDENT OF RAJMAHAL, P.O. RAJMAHAL, DISTRICT SAHEBGANJ, JHARKHAND, PIN-816108, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF SARYUG APARTMENT, PATLIPUTRA COLONY, FLAT NO.303, P.S. PATLIPUTRA, DISTRICT PATNA, PIN- 800013. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NEW SECRETARIAT, VIKASH BHAWAN PATNA. 3. THE CHAIRMAN, BUREAU OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES (FINANCE DEPARTT.), BIHAR, PATNA, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. JOINT DIRECTOR, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, BUREAU OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES, BIHAR, PATNA, OLD SECRETARIAT. 5. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BELTRON BHAWAN, PATNA-23, SHASTRI NAGAR-800023 THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 6. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. BELTRON BHAWAN, SHASTRINAGAR, PATNA-23. 7. THE MANAGER, ADMINISTRATION, BIHAR STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. PATNA- 23. 8. SRI R.N. SINGH, EX-MD BELTRON BHAWAN, B.S.E.D.C., BELTRON BHAWAN, PATNA-23, CHANDRA BHAWAN, LOHIA NAGAR, MIG KANKARBAGH, P.S. KANKARBAGH, PATNA-23. ----------- 02. 04.05.2011 From the averments made in the restoration application it is evident that C.W.J.C. No.12676 of 2002 was earlier dismissed for default under orders dated 26.3.2009, whereafter the same was restored but again dismissed for default under orders dated 17.9.2010. In view of the default made by the counsel for the petitioner twice, I direct him to deposit 2 Rs.1,000/- with the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee within one week from today and to pay Rs.1,000/- to Sri Nalin Bilochan Tiwary AC to Mr. Shivajee Pandey the counsel for Bihar State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd., within the same time. On deposit/payment made C.W.J.C. No.12676 of 2002 be restored to its original file and number with direction to the counsel for the Corporation to produce the resolution of the 91st meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation held on 30.9.2002, whereunder decision was taken to terminate the appointment of the petitioner on the ground that the same was made illegally. Restoration application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)