IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20586 of 2000 Between: Kum. Padmavathi Devamma, D/o.Narsappa, R/o.C/o.Subba Reddy, 51/102/-A1, Sree Seetharamanagar, Kurnool. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musherabad, Hyderabad. 2 Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Kurnool Region, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner under bread winner scheme is illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as conductor Grade-II or Shramik on compassionate grounds according to the Cricular No.PD-100/99, dated:10.11.1999 issued by the corporation, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems ﬁt and proper under the circumsatances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J September 16, 2008 CVRK