IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 676 of 2008 Satish Kumar and others …….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate vice Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate vice Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder has given statement that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. 3. Mr. Pawan Mishra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 has further submitted that chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioners before the Court concerned and the Magistrate has taken the cognizance on 21/10/2008, as such, the petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Interim order dated 28. 08.2008 stands vacated. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 05.12.2008 Shiv