THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA SECOND APPEAL No.711 of 2009 Date: 30.10.2009 Between: Pakala Bhaskar … Appellant And Vikram Sambasiva Rao … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA SECOND APPEAL No.711 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: On the last occasion, when the matter came up for consideration, learned counsel for the appellant was not present. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”. 2. Despite the matter being posted under the caption “FOR DISMISSAL”, today when the matter is called, learned counsel appearing for the appellant is not present and there is no representation on his behalf. 3. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 30.10.2009 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA SECOND APPEAL No.711 of 2009 30.10.2009 (Msr)