THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.4810 OF 2011 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 18-8-2011 passed in IA No.3919 of 2009 in OS No.305 of 2004 by the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned order passed by the Court below. 3. The petitioners herein are defendants in the suit, filed the above IA under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC to reject the plaint in OS No.305 of 2004, in the interest of justice. The suit in question was filed for recovery of money by the respondent herein. The petitioners seek to reject the plaint only on the ground that as per the terms of the agreement dated 1-12-1999 said to be entered into by the parties, there is an arbitration clause to refer the matter to arbitration in case of any dispute between the parties as to the terms of the agreement and, therefore, the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff without having recourse to arbitration clause is not maintainable. By the impugned order the Court below having considered matter observed that the petitioners have no right to make a request to refer the matter to arbitration which is the subject of matter suit, when they have no right to seek relief under the provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It was stated that the payments under the contract are concluded payments and voluntarily admitted to be due to the respondent herein. Cause of action is a bundle of facts and therefore rejection of plaint cannot be ordered in routine manner. In the instant case, the suit is of the year 2004 and it is borne out from the order that issues are framed and the matter is coming up for trial. 4. In the circumstances, the impugned order passed by the Court below does not warrant any interference by this Court. In the result, the civil revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed, at the admission stage itself. __________________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated: 25-11-2011 Nrg