CW 3282/07 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.3282/2007 Kailash Chand Versus MACT Dausa & Others. Date of Order ::: 18/05/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Liyakat Ali Khan, for petitioner Instant petition has been filed against the compensation awarded in MACT Case No.236/03 in permanent Lok Adalat vide order dt.13/10/06 (Ann.1). It is not in dispute by petitioner that total compensation awarded to petitioner was Rs.43,000/- and complete amount in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties, was received by him. His only objection is that compromise has not been signed by petitioner and his lawyer without instructions acted upon entering into compromise on his behalf. Suffice it to say that once petitioner signed Vakalatnama in favour of his lawyer who has full authority to act upon his behalf as power of attorney for all practical purposes. If lawyer has arrived at compromise on behalf of his client, he cannot be considered to be at fault particularly in the facts of instant case, when petitioner accepted amount of compensation under impugned order passed on compromise in CW 3282/07 //2// course of permanent Lok Adalat and his acceptance of amount implies to draw inference of his consent made. This Court does not find any manifest error apparent on record, which may call for interference in the order impugned. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/3282CW07May18Ds.doc