IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3555 of 2010 DR. BISHUN PADA DUTTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.2649 of 2010 DR. NAWAL KISHORE PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.585 of 2010 SUBHASH CHANDRA GHOSH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.586 of 2010 PROF. NAGENDRA PRASAD VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.587 of 2010 DR. PARAS NATH SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.1414 of 2010 DR. KRISHNA ACHARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.1415 of 2010 DR. AJAY KRISHNA KEOLYAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.1416 of 2010 DR. (SMT.) SHAKUNTALA VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.1418 of 2010 DR. RAM NANDAN SHUKLA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.1419 of 2010 DR. MADAN PRASAD SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. 2 with MJC No.1420 of 2010 DR. RAJESHWAR PRAASAD SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.1421 of 2010 DR. MAKESHWAR PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.2753 of 2010 DR. YUGAL KISHORE PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with MJC No.2648 of 2010 DR. INDU KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 04. 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the respondent – University. In view of the show cause stating the details of the payment and the calculation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the above contempt applications need not proceed further and the same are accordingly, disposed of. It will be open for the petitioners to bring it to the notice of the concerned authority with regard to any discrepancy in calculation. In case such discrepancies are brought to the notice of the Registrar of the University the same may be looked into. In view of the above, since the order has been 3 complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same stands disposed of. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)