CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: October 19, 2011. Parties Name Balwinder Singh ...APPELLANT. VERSUS State of Punjab ...RESPONDENT CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina PRESENT: Mr. H.S.Gill, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate, for the appellant. Mrs. Gurveen H. Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab Jasbir Singh, J. JUDGMENT Balwinder Singh, the appellant, in Criminal Appeal No. 983- DB of 2002 along with his father Resham Singh and mother Gurnam Kaur were put to face trial for commission of an offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC in FIR No. 72 dated August 21, 1999, for committing murder of Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur wife of the appellant (accused), CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -2- named above. Vide the impugned judgment dated August 21, 1999, the appellant was convicted for commission of an offence under Section 302 IPC and on December 2, 2002, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- with a default clause. However his father Resham Singh and mother Gurnam Kaur were acquitted of the charge framed against them. The State of Punjab has filed Criminal Appeal 752-DBA of 2003, titled as State of Punjab v. Resham Singh and another, to lay challenge to their acquittal. To dictate order, facts are being taken from Criminal Appeal No. 983-DB of 2002. Marriage of appellant Balwinder Singh was solemnised with Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur more than 14 years before the date of occurrence. Out of the wed-lock, two children were born. On receipt of beatings at the hands of the appellant, she died on August 20, 1999, which led to the registration of a criminal case against the appellant and his parents. Prosecution was launched against the accused persons on a statement Ex. PA, made by Waryam Singh (PW3), brother of the deceased, wherein he has stated that “he is a resident of Gobind Nagri Faridkot and is an agriculturist by profession. He has two brothers and two sisters. His sister Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur, now deceased, was married to accused Balwinder Singh son of Resham Singh of village Rameana about 14 years back and their cohabitation resulted in the birth of two children, namely, Amandeep Kaur aged 12 years and Shamsher Singh aged about nine CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -3- years. After three years of the marriage, accused Balwinder Singh started harassing Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur and he also used to give beatings to her. He turned her out of the matrimonial house thrice after giving beatings to her. However, with the intervention of Sarpanch Harjit Singh of Bholuwala and other respectables, they sent her to her in-laws' house, but her husband Balwinder Singh and his parents Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur continued compelling her to bring money from her parents and they told her that she was of black complexion and that in case she did not bring the money from her parents, then she would be deserted. On 19.8.1999, the complainant and his father Surjan Singh came to know that Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur had been caused injuries by her husband Balwinder Singh, her father-in-law Resham Singh and mother-in-law Gurnam Kaur and in order to enquire about that fact, they visited village Rameana. On reaching there, they learnt that the accused had taken Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur to some private doctor at Jaitu Mandi. Then they went to the clinic of that doctor and finding Gurnam Kaur in serious condition, they after making arrangement of conveyance brought her to GGS Medical College Hospital, Faridkot, where the doctor gave her treatment, but she breathed her last during that night. The complainant further stated that on their way to GGS Medical College/ Hospital, Faridkot from Jaitu, Gurnam Kaur @ Jagdish Kaur told them that at about 2.00 p.m. her husband Balwinder Singh gave her invisible injuries and when her husband was giving beatings to her, then his parents Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur accused were instigating him to give more beatings to her and to finish her and they were saying that they would pursue the case after selling their land. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -4- The motive behind the occurrence is that the accused persons did not want to rehabilitate Gurnam Kaur deceased due to her dark complexion and they used to compel her to bring money from her parents for her rehabilitation in their house. The complainant further stated that all the accused in furtherance of their common intention committed the murder of Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur by inflicting fatal injuries to her.” Statement of Waryam Singh (PW3) was recorded in a Hospital at Faridkot, the same was sent to the Police Station, which resulted into registration of an FIR Ex. PA/1 against the persons named above. In the morning on August 21, 1999, the Investigating Officer prepared an inquest report of the dead body (Ex. PE) and sent it for post-mortem examination, which was conducted by Dr. K.K.Aggarwal (PW1) at 3.45 PM. He then reached at the spot and prepared a rough site plan of the place of occurrence with correct marginal notes. He also recorded statements of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Appellant Balwinder Singh was arrested on August 29, 1999. During investigation, Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur were found innocent and their name was put in column No. 2 of the final report. However, during trial, they were summoned to face the prosecution by invoking the provisions of Section 319 Cr.P.C. As per law, copies of the documents were supplied to the accused. They were charge-sheeted, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution produced seven witnesses and also brought on record documentary evidence to prove its case. On conclusion of prosecution evidence, statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Incriminating material existing on CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -5- record was put to them, which they denied, pleaded innocence and false implication. Appellant Balwinder Singh further stated as under: “My wife Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur was suffering from 'Menorrhoea' (Vaginal bleeding) and was taken to Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, where she was got admitted by me and at that time some documents were got signed from me. I am separate in mess and residence from my parents. On that day my mother and brother's wife (Bhabi) had gone to the parental house of my brother's wife and my father had gone to the fields and I was alone in the house. I had sent a message to the parents of the deceased Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur about her condition on account of Vaginal bleeding and about her admission in the hospital upon which they reached the hospital. I am innocent. Shamsher Singh and Amandeep Kaur our children were also not present at the time when I took my wife to the hospital on account of bleeding.” Similarly, Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur took up a stand that they were living separate from Balwinder Singh, and has nothing to do so far as the incident in question is concerned. They also led evidence in defence. The trial Court, on conclusion of the trial, found appellant Balwinder Singh guilty of the offence with which he was charged and accordingly he was convicted and sentenced vide the impugned judgment and order, as mentioned in the earlier part of this judgment. Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur were found innocent and they were acquitted. Hence CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -6- these appeals. Heard counsel for the parties. Shri H.S.Gill, Senior Advocate, counsel for appellant Balwinder Singh, by making reference to the evidence on record, has vehemently contended that Smt. Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur had died a natural death. She was suffering from some disease, which led to her death. To say so, reference was made to the deposition made by Shamsher Singh (PW4) son of the deceased, in which he has stated that his mother was ill, on account of which he was called from the School to the house. In the alternative, counsel prayed that the offence under Section 302 IPC is not made out against the appellant. At the maximum it may be a case of simple hurt. No weapon of offence was used. As per allegation of the prosecution, only fist and kick blows were given by the appellant to the deceased. Against Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur (Parents of the appellant), it was only allegation that they had been encouraging the appellant when he was giving beating to the deceased. No injury to the deceased has been attributed to them. By making reference to the defence evidence on record, it is stated that both of them were found innocent during investigation, thereafter were summoned to face trial, they were living separate, which fact is proved through the deposition of DW1 Tarlok Rai, Inspector-II, Food and Supplies Department, who has proved separate ration card in the name of Resham Singh. In the said ration card, names of only two members of the family were entered. DW2 Tej Kaur has also stated that they were living separate from appellant Balwinder Singh. Counsel prayed that the appeal be allowed and the appellant be acquitted of the charge CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -7- framed against him. He further prayed that the appeal filed by the State be dismissed. Prayer made has vehemently been opposed by Mrs. Gurveen H. Singh, the State counsel, who by making reference to the statements of PW3 Waryam Singh, PW4 Shamsher Singh and the medical evidence on record argued that guilt of the accused was proved on record. Son of deceased Shamsher Singh (PW4) has categorically stated that her mother was severely beaten up by the appellant and that Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur were encouraging him to give more beatings to his mother. It is further submitted that it was so disclosed to Waryam Singh (PW3), when the deceased was being taken to the Hospital. She prayed that the appeal filed by Balwinder Singh accused be dismissed, whereas Cr. Appeal No. 752- DBA of 2003, filed by the State, be allowed and the respondents therein be convicted and sentenced for the offence with which they were charged. So far as Balwinder Singh, appellant- accused, is concerned, it is virtually proved on record that he had caused injuries to his wife by giving her fist and kick blows. Statement of PW4 Shamsher Singh (son of the appellant) is very clear and it inspires confidence. The boy has specifically stated that in his presence, his father had given fist and kick blows to his mother. His mother became unconscious. Waryam Singh (PW3) has stated that when he was shifting the deceased to the hospital, on her way, she told that she had been beaten up by the appellant. Post-mortem on the dead body was conducted by Dr. K.K.Aggarwal (PW1) on August 21, 1999, at 3.45 PM. He observed that rigor mortis was present in all the four limbs of the deceased. The inner CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -8- aspect of the Salwar was stained with blood and a blood-stained pad was lying inside the thighs. Small clots of blood were coming out of vagina. He observed the following injuries on the person of the deceased: “1. Reddish brown abrasion 1.5 cmx x .5 cm was present on the left labia majora. Pubic hair was blood stained. On dissection of the abdomen, there was a retro paritoneal haemotoma on the posterior part as well as haemotoma underneath the parietal peritonium anteriorly in the area of 20 cms x 10 cms. There was a small tear over the mesentery measuring 3 cms x 1 cm. There was haemotoma over the pelvic colon also. About 200 cc of reddish coloured fluid and clotted blood was present in the pouch of the douglas. Rest of the organs were normal.” It was further opined that the injuries were ante mortem in nature and cause of death was due to haemorrhage shock as a result of the abdominal injury, which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. In the statement of above witness, it is clearly stated that only one external injury was present over the pubic region of the dead body. It is further stated that there was no external mark of injury over the abdomen. Taking note of the evidence on record, it becomes apparently clear that the death had occurred on account of injury caused by the appellant to the deceased. At the same time, it is to be noted that the deceased has not used any weapon of offence. He had also taken the deceased to the hospital. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -9- It is on record and also admitted by PW4 Shamsher Singh (son of the deceased) that his mother was ill on the date of incident. The said fact is also coming out from the reading of the statement made by PW1 Dr. K.K.Aggarwal. It appears that there may be some wear and tear in the family life of the deceased and the appellant, on account of which beating was given by the appellant to the deceased. However, at the same time, there is nothing on record to show that the appellant intended to kill the deceased. At the same time, it cannot be ignored that he had given injury to the deceased at a very sensitive part of the body, that too with a great force. This fact is proved when we look into the medical evidence on record. Internal injuries to the deceased in her abdomen were very severe. In view of facts of this case, it is not possible to convict the appellant for commission of offence under Section 302 IPC. His offence is covered under the provisions of Section 304 part II IPC. To that extent, order of conviction stands modified. Under similar circumstances in the case of Sumer Chand v. State of Haryana etc., 1998(1) RCR ( Criminal) 399, a Division Bench of this Court has observed thus: “We find considerable merit in the sole contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant. The reading of FIR clearly makes it out that insofar as appellant is concerned, he had given only one injury, even though on the head of Amit Kumar. He did not thereafter either give any injury to Amit Kumar or to Bhagwat Parshad. It is not clear from the medical evidence as to whether Amit Kumar died on account of the injuries that he CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -10- sustained on his head. The death of Amit Kumar could well be on account of septicaemia. In fact, it is clearly stated by PW1 Dr. J.R. Chauhan that death was on account of septicaemia. The doctor, however, did not further clarify as to whether septicaemia was the direct result of the injuries. On the other hand, PW11 Dr. M.R. Passi had stated that there were less chances of septicaemia creeping in the skull underneath injury No. 2 of Amit Kumar unless the wound had been opened. The Surgeon would open the wound for the sake of treatment and possibility of infection could not be ruled out after opening of the wound because there was never 100% fool proof sterlization. From reading of the evidence, referred to above, it is thus clearly made out that Amit Kumar could have developed septicaemia because of operation also. That possibility, in any case, cannot be ruled out. If that be so, surely, appellant cannot be pinned down for an offence under Section 302 IPC. He is, however, held guilty under Section 304 Part II IPC and convicted accordingly. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that ends of justice would be fully served if the appellant is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years. We order accordingly. The order regarding fine that was imposed by the learned trial Judge is, however, maintained and so also the consequence of non-payment thereof.” CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -11- To the same effect is the opinion of another Division Bench of this Court in the case of Gian Chand and another v. State of Haryana Criminal Appeal No. 509-DB of 1998, decided on September 1, 2008. In that case also, taking note of a fact that only one injury was given and the assault was not repeated, offence was converted to one under Section 304 Part II IPC in place of Section 302 IPC. Same is the situation in the present case. It is not possible for us to believe that the appellant had an intention to kill the deceased. The marriage was solemnised between the appellant and the deceased more than 14 years ago. Couple was blessed with two children, who were studying in a school. There is no history of causing injury to the deceased by the appellant. Earlier to the present incident, matter was never referred to the police. In view of above, statement of the prosecution witnesses that the appellant wanted to get rid of the deceased as she was not of a fair colour is not believable. It appears that the injury might have been caused in a huff on account of some family dispute. So far as Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur are concerned, it is admitted on record that during investigation, they were found innocent. Even as per case of the prosecution, no overt act has been attributed to them in causing an injury to the deceased. It is only allegation against them that when appellant Balwinder Singh was giving beatings to the deceased, they were encouraging him. It appears that on account of death of Gurnam Kaur alias Jagdish Kaur, her brother Waryam Singh (PW3) has made an attempt to falsely implicate the parents of Balwinder Singh also in this case. The CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -12- statement of Shamsher Singh (PW4) was recorded after more than 2 ½ months of the date of incident. It is also coming out from the record that after death, the minor children were taken away by the maternal parents and were living with them when Shamsher Singh deposed in the Court. It has also come on record that Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur were having a separate ration card and were living separate from their son Balwinder Singh. It has also been said so by DW2 Tej Kaur, a neighbour, who has further stated that the deceased was suffering from a disease and was under treatment at the time of her death. In view of facts, mentioned above, Criminal Appeal No. 983- DB of 2002 is partly allowed, conviction and sentence awarded to appellant Balwinder Singh under Section 302 IPC are set aside. Instead, his conviction is converted into one under Section 304, Part II IPC and he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of eight years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. Balwinder Singh, appellant is on bail. He be taken into custody to undergo the remaining part of his sentence. So far as Criminal Appeal No. 752-DBA of 2003 is concerned, the State counsel has failed to indicate any infirmity so far as acquittal of Resham Singh and Gurnam Kaur is concerned. Opinion expressed by the trial Court is as per law and facts on record. No misreading of evidence has been indicated. In view of ratio of the judgments of the Supreme Court in State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran, (2007) 3 SCC 755 and in Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415 and Mrinal Das & others v. The State CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 983-DB OF 2002 -13- of Tripura, (Criminal Appeal No. 1719 of 2011), decided on September 5, 2011, no case is made out to interfere in this case. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal No. 752-DBA of 2003 is dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( Sabina) Judge October 19, 2011 DKC