IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3255 of 2005. Date of Decision: 22nd April, 2009. Gurmail Singh & Ors. ....Petitioners through None Versus Santa Singh ...Respondent through Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner/plaintiff has directed this Revision Petition against the orders dated 16.2.2005 and 19.5.2005 passed by learned trial Court and the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur respectively whereby his application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC has been dismissed and that order was affirmed in appeal. There is a serious dispute between the parties regarding Path/Pahi 'ABCA' situated in Khasra NO.815. While issuing notice of motion, this Court, vide order dated 17.6.2005 directed the parties “to maintain status-quo with regard to Path/Pahi 'ABCA' situate in Khasra No.815. The afore- stated interim order was made absolute while admitting the revision petition. Learned counsel for the respondent states that despite his best efforts, he has not been able to contact the respondent. According to him, it appears that the matter has been compromised. Be that as it may, even if the suit is still pending, the fact remains that the interim order directing the parties to maintain status- quo is operating from last over four years and in these circumstances, I do not deem it necessary to go into the merits of the case. Consequently, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that if the suit is still pending, the parties shall maintain status-quo regarding Path/Pahi “ABCA” situate in Khasra NO.815, till the disposal of the suit. April 22, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE