^Cs)\wl°^ IN THE MADHYA PRADESH STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TIBUNAL JABALPURBENCH of 1997 O. A. No. APPLICANT: Shn Kodn La! Eoshale s/o Sfari Harish Chandra Koshale aged abont 31 years, Secretary Grain Panchayat, Bhanwarda» tahsil Bemetara distoctDm-g. vs. . RESPONDENTS: 1. The State. of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Panefa^at Evam Gramin Vikas Department, VallAh Bhawaa, Bhopal. 2. The Snb-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bemetara., disfrict Dnrg. 3. Ttie ClnefExeciitive OfiBcer.JfflipadPanch^^Bemetara, disb-ictDurg. DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION 1. Particulars of the appMcant: Tlie applicant is a citizsn ofthe equalitarian and welfare state oflndia having fiindameatalrights enshriaed in Part III ofthe Constitution oflndia. The applicaatwas ^spoiiited as Seeretary Gram Pancliayat, Bhanwarda, tafasil Bemetara (iigtrict Dnrg on 12.12.95. His service reeord bas been satisfactory tlsroughoiifc His services have been qipreciated. 2. Particulars of the Respondente: As deteiied above in fhe tit!e ofihe application. 3. Particulars of tfae order againrt •'ivhich appiication is made. 'Ilie application is against tfae, foUowmg order:- (i) Order No. 91/ J.P./97, Annexure A/l; (ii)Date: 2.5.97; (iii) Passed by : The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat (iv) Subjsct in brief: Discriminatory, Malafide, arbitrary aad punitive termuialion ofsen'ice, againstthe priiiciples ofnatoraljustice, in colourable exereise of powers on extraaeous and oblique considerations without aay eBipiiiy. 4. T!ie applicant deciares that the snbject-matter of tfae order against wfaieh he wants redressal is within the jiffisdiction ofihe Tribima!. • 0<-^~ . Uperi<lrsriath Awasthi Counsel for the Applieant ^^^'K^.'f I-HC-22 311^1-^ (<•)['* sf^y ^i4{^ ^f??l Sinha T3 "•qi'lllcl''), ^•y'l'i. fadl'M^ SIT^T 'C(5ra? ^w^.^ ^ 1|1<I?11 %*<!* I^^ST' 3il^?[ ?^IW ^rf?<T SB: Hon'ble Shri Maalndra Molian Shrlvastava, J 12.03.2010 caUed p^ssed When fhe matter was petitioner and ftie matter was none appears for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. f\dvoca-te. for the State. The petition is ttierefore di| +i'iii<')iii-f tiiti<!fi4 fezt <r«i«;i< ^aipOTan^T for hearing, none appeared for fhe over. Even in the second round, iiuissed forwaat ofprosecution. Sd/- - ManindraMohanShriyastava Judge ^SvSQ^S:'r;s.:S^