THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1237 of 2010 Dated 20th August, 2010 Between: Nadigadda Kattameedi Mohammed Yunus. …Petitioner And Nadigadda Kattameedi Nazeera Sultana and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K. Mallikarjuna Reddy for Sri P. Veera Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri B.S. Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 8: None appeared The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of the order dated 03.02.2010 in Transfer O.P.No.53 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Kurnool. The father of the petitioner filed O.S.No.131 of 2006 in the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Fast Track Court, Nandyal, for declaration that gift deed dated 03.06.2005 executed by him in favour of respondent No.1 is void and unenforceable. He has also sought for a consequential permanent injunction. Pending the said suit, the petitioner’s father died and the petitioner and others came on record as his legal representatives. Respondent No.1, who is the wife of the petitioner, filed O.S.No.51 of 2006 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, for dissolution of her marriage with the petitioner. The petitioner filed O.S.No.573 of 2006 in the same Court against respondent No.1 for restitution of conjugal rights. After coming on record in O.S.No.131 of 2006, the petitioner filed Transfer O.P.No.53 of 2009 in the Court of the Principal District Judge, Kurnool, for transfer of O.S.Nos.51 and 573 of 2006 from the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, to the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Fast Track Court, Nandyal, to be tried and disposed of along with O.S.No.131 of 2006. This application was dismissed by the learned District Judge under the impugned order. In the order under revision, the learned District Judge reasoned that the evidence in O.S.No.131 of 2006 was closed long back and that in view of the stay granted by the District Court in Transfer O.P., the said suit was not disposed of. The learned District Judge further observed that the subject matter of O.S.No.131 of 2006 has no nexus with the two suits filed by the petitioner and respondent No.1 which are pending in the Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Nandyal. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner made strenuous efforts to convince this Court that all the three suits have intricate connection with each other, I do not find any merit in this submission. While O.S.Nos.51 and 573 of 2006 raised the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.1, O.S.No.131 of 2006 pertains to the dispute relating to the gift deed executed by the petitioner’s father in favour of respondent No.1. Therefore, there is no connection whatsoever between the said suit and the other two suits. The District Court very rightly declined the request of the petitioner for clubbing of the three suits and I do not find any error in the order under revision. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the C.R.P., interim stay granted on 01.04.2010 and extended on 27.04.2010 and 02.06.2010 is vacated and C.R.P.M.P.No.1688 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th August, 2010 GHN