IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.16626 of 2010 Date of decision 27 .9.2010 Union of India and another ... Petitioners Versus I.D.Vijh and others ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. IS Sidhu ,Advocate for the petitioners 1.To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2.Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The Union of India has challenged the order dated 15.1.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for brevity 'the Tribunal') accepting the claim of the Original Applicant- respondent for payment of his medical bills. The Tribunal has based its decision on an earlier order passed in OA No. 706 Pb. 2005 'Shalo Ram v. Union of India and others'. The view of the Tribunal was upheld by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 981 CAT of 2007 decided on 22.1.2007. Even the Special Leave Petition has been dismissed. Having heard the learned counsel we are of the view that the Division Bench judgement of this Court dated 22.1.2007 (P.5) cannot be distinguished on facts and law nor any thing has been urged for taking such a view. The matter is covered against the petitioners and in favour of the Original Applicant- respondents. The writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge ( Ritu Bahri ) 27 .9.2010 Judge okg