WP(C) 62/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for se tting aside and quashing of the Annexure-8 order dated 5.9.2008, by which her se rvices as temporary copyist in the establishment of the Chief Judicial Magistrat e, Hailakandi was dispensed with. The petitioner has also prayed for setting asi de and quashing the Annexure-9 advertisement issued thereafter for the post of C opyist/LD Assistant. The prayer of the petitioner is to regularize her service a s copyist instead of filling up the same by following the procedure envisaged in the recruitment rules. Mr. K.K. Dey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that si nce the petitioner had continued in the particular post for a fairly long spell, her prayer for regularization is required to be considered by the Chief Judicia l Magistrate, Hailakandi. On the other hand, Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned State Couns el referring to the decision reported in (2006) 2 GLT 654 (FB) (Jiten Kalita Vs. State of Assam & Ors.) submits that the petitioner cannot claim automatic regul arization of her service dehorse the recruitment rules. In view of the above, the relief prayed for by the petitioner ca nnot be granted. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of providing that it wil l be open for her to participate in the regular selection process. Writ petition is disposed of.