IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40329 of 2010 DILIP YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report and a suspicion has been raised against him by the informant. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge that during course of the investigation, deceased was seen along with First Information Report named accused Nandjee Yadav and so far as petitioner is concerned, his voice was heard in the night from the house of the aforesaid Nandjee Yadav. Furthermore, the witnesses stated that when the dead body of the deceased was taken out from well, petitioner along with aforesaid co-accused, Nandjee Yadav were present there but they refused to identify the dead body of the deceased. Apart from the aforesaid circumstances, it appears that there is nothing against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as materials collected by the Investigating Officer during course of the investigation, above named petitioner, Dilip Yadav, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 115 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)