dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1777 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1777 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.1777 OF 2008 M/s.TVC Sky Shop Ltd. & ors. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents. Mr.Harinder Toor i/b. M/s.Mohanty & Associates for the petitioners. Ms.P.H.Kantharia, APP for respondent no.1-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & : BILAL NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 14th January, 2009. : 14th January, 2009. : 14th January, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. There is no case made out by the petitioners to quash the Criminal Complaint No.1809/SS of 2005 which is filed by respondent no.2 under Section 138 read with 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, as the complaint itself shows that a cheque was given by the petitioners for an amount of Rs.26,59,342.50 ps. which got bounced from the Bank on the ground that "payments stopped by the drawer". Therefore, prima facie there is a case for the trial. The petitioners submits that they have also filed a complaint against the respondents under Section 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and, therefore, this Court should order that this complaint should be heard and clubbed together. Such a prayer can be made before the learned Sessions Judge in an appropriate application. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to make such an ( 2 ) application, if so advised. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL (BILAL (BILAL NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.)