IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 11087 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.05.2011 Jagar Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, D.A.G Punjab Ms Sonia G Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 states that the compromise has fallen through and therefore, the respondent is disputing the said compromise. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No. 2, the present petition for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise is not maintainable. Dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 10.05.2011 Judge mohan