IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1634 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 8.9.2009 Kewal Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Satyajit Singh Majithia, Secretary and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. GPS Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.21313-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1634 of 2009 As per the averments made in this case, vide order dated 28.4.2008 passed in CWP No.6908 of 2008, the respondents were directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, which was attached as Annexure P-1 with the aforesaid writ petition, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the aforesaid order. It is the further case of the petitioner that the aforesaid certified copy of the order dated 28.4.2008 was forwarded by this Court to the aforesaid respondents. The petitioner also submitted a copy to the respondents and in spite of the aforesaid fact, the respondents have failed to pass any order thereon. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Without going into the merits of the averments made in this petition, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, attached as Annexure P-1 with CWP No.6908 of 2008, (if not already decided) within two months from the date COCP No.1634 of 2009 (O&M) -2- of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is needless to say that if the aforesaid representation already stands decided, the respondents shall communicate the same to the petitioner. September 8, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE