IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 8TH ASWINA 1933 RP.No. 704 of 2011(J) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17895/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------- REMYAMOL, LPSA (MALAYALAM), GOVERNMENT LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, MULLARIKUDY, IDUKKI-685 571, RESIDING AT PERIKILAMKATTIL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 590. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, IDUKKI AT THODUPUZHA, PIN-685 584. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ADIMALI-685 561. 3. THE HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, MULLARIKUDY, IDUKKI-686 564. 4. SHEELA M.N., HEADMISTRESS, GOVERNMENT LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, CHICKANAMKUDY, MANKULAM P.O., PIN-685 565, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 565. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE FOR R1 TO R3 SHRI K.T.SHYAMKUMAR FOR R4 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN RP.NO.704/11 PETITIONER'S EXTS: COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.5.9.11 IN W.P.(C)No.17895/11 TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- Review Petition No.704 OF 2011 in W.P.(C)No.17895 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011 O R D E R The writ petitioner is the review petitioner herein. 2. The Review Petition is filed only to clarify one aspect. In the operative portion of the judgment, this Court while directing the petitioner to furnish the service book, also required the petitioner to make available the PSC hall ticket and identification certificate with photograph, if the same has not been supplied so far. 3. It is pointed out in the Review Petition that actually those documents will have to be forwarded usually by the appointing authority, after receipt from the PSC, along with a copy of the appointment order, hall ticket showing the date and venue of the examination and the identification certificate with photograph to the Head of Office of the school where the candidate joins service. In the case of the review petitioner also the said documents were sent to the Head of Office. Therefore R.P.No.704/11 -2- what is contended is that those documents are not the one to be possessed by the petitioner or to be produced by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent also submitted that same is the procedure. 4. In that view of the matter, it is clarified that the petitioner may not be compelled to produce those documents, namely, PSC hall ticket and identification certificate with photograph and if any documents are required to prove the identity of the petitioner, the same can be directed to be done by the Head of Office. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that service book has already been produced and if so, there will be a direction to the Headmaster of the school to take appropriate action in the matter. With the above observation, the Review Petition is disposed of. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn