1 ao1066-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1066 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1300 OF 2010 Vidyadhar Anil Pawar .. Appellant V/s. Mumbai Housing & Area Development Authority & Ors. .. Respondents ..... Mr. Atul B. Deshkar for the appellant. Mr. Hitesh P. Vyas for respondent No.3. Mr. R. R. Sharma for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 9, 2011 P.C.:- The learned counsel appearing for the appellant on instructions of the appellant states that the Appellant is accepting the impugned order of return of plaint. He prays that time fixed under the impugned order to receive the plaint be extended. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, time granted under the impugned order to 2 ao1066-10 receive back the plaint is extended by a period of six week from today. If the plaint is not received back within the stipulated period of six weeks, the same will be stands rejected without reference to the Court. 3. Civil Application No.1300 of 2010 does not survive and the same is disposed of. 4. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. JUDGE