1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2578 OF 2009 DFS India Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. .. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner of Customs ... Respondent Mr. V.R. Dhond i/by Crawford Bayley & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 17TH MARCH, 2010 P. C.: The Petitioner has approached this court on the ground that the Customs Authorities could not have seized their products as they were meant for display/distribution/supply/sale located at duty free shops at the departure terminal of Chhatrapati Shivaji Air Port Mumbai. An interim relief was sought which was declined. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner moved Supreme Court where the Hon’beo Supreme Court was pleased to pass the following order : “The petitioner is challenging the Order passed by the High 2 Court where the petitioner was declined interim relief. The petitioner is permitted to carry on the sale of Cigarettes and other Tobacco products in the departure terminal subject to fulfilling the conditions of Section 32 of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003. The Respondent-Department is directed to release the stock subject to the petitioner fulfilling the above conditions. The special leave petition is disposed of accordingly.” Considering that the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the Petitioner is permitted to carry on sale of Cigarettes at the departure terminal, in our opinion, the final relief can be granted to the Petitioners in terms of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Order accordingly. Petition accordingly disposed of. (A.A. SAYED,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)