1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION M.C.A. NO.81/2008 Sujata Dhanve Petitioner Vs. Amol Dhanve Respondent Mr.A.R.Pitale,advocate for the petitioner None for the respondent CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 26th November,2008 P.C. 1] The petitioner has sought transfer of the petition for divorce filed by the respondent at Beed which is at the distance of 450 k.m. from her place of residence in Thane District. The petitioner and the respondent are employed. The petitioner has a government job whereas the respondent is employed in a company. There are no children. 2] The petitioner herself did not appear to be interested in continuing the marriage. In the circumstances I see no reason to transfer the matter subject to the respondent paying reasonable cost to the petitioner for attending the Court at Beed. 2 3] In the circumstances the application for transfer is rejected subject to the respondent paying the petitioner a sum of Rs.2,500/- for every visit that the petitioner is required to make to Beed for the purpose of the said litigation. 4] The amount shall be paid prior to every date of hearing .The trial Court shall proceed with the matter only if the amounts are so paid. The M.C.A.is disposed of accordingly.