:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (M) NO. 146 & 147 OF 2005. IN FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 89 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 89 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2005. 2005. 2005. Sachin D. Raskar ..Applicant. Versus. Sou. Meenal Sachin Raskar. ..Respondent. --- Mr. U.B.Nighot for the applicants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE JJ JJ JJ DATE: DATE: DATE: JULY 11, 2005. JULY 11, 2005. JULY 11, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. By these applications, the applicant is making request that pending the appeal, execution, operation and implementation of the judgment and order dated 21.2.2003 passed in Petition No. 13 of 2001 to the extent of granting permanent alimony of Rs.2,000/- per month kindly be stayed. In fact, during the pendency of the appeal, the amount of alimony is required to be paid and therefore the applications are hereby rejected. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.) :srp/2005/ :2: :2: :2: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 88 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 88 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2005. 2005. 2005. AND FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 89 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 89 OF COURT APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2005. 2005. 2005. Sachin D. Raskar ..Appellant. Versus. Sou. Meenal Sachin Raskar. ..Respondent. --- Mr. U.B.Nighot for the appellant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE JJ JJ JJ DATE: DATE: DATE: JULY 11, 2005. JULY 11, 2005. JULY 11, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Admit. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.) :srp/2005/