HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 5738 of 2010 Dated: 23.08.2011 Between: B.Saroja and 2 others. … Petitioners And M/s. Shriram Chits Pvt., Ltd., and 2 others. … Respondents HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 5738 of 2010 O R D E R: The 1st respondent herein is the decree holder in O.S.No.1410 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. While passing the said decree for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,91,2000/- with interest, the Court below permitted the defendant No.1/revision petitioner No.1 herein to pay in instalments at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month till the realization of the decretal amount commencing from July, 2010. Alleging that the defendant No.1 failed to pay the monthly instalments, the decree holder filed E.P.No.44 of 2010 and the court below issued a warrant for attachment of the movables of the judgment debtors. Alleging that the judgment debtors/revision petitioners resisted the execution of warrant, the decree holder filed E.A.No.61 of 2010 for police assistance. The said E.A.No.61 of 2010 was allowed by order dated 22.11.2010 and aggrieved by the same, the judgment debtors filed the present revision petition. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is represented by the learned counsel for both the parties that the attachment of the movables has not yet been effected in view of the fact that the revision petitioners have been paying the instalments at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will continue to pay the monthly instalments regularly in terms of the judgment and decree in O.S.NO.1410 of 2006 till the decree is satisfied in full. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no need for police assistance as ordered in E.A.No.61 of 2010. Accordingly, the order under revision dated 22.11.2010 is hereby set aside and the revision petition is disposed of recording the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the monthly instalments would be paid by the revision petitioners regularly in terms of the judgment and decree in O.S.NO.1410 of 2006 till the decree is satisfied in full. No costs. _______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 23.08.2011 KLP