HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. VENKATA RAMANA SECOND APPEAL No.416 OF 2001 ORDER: Memo filed on behalf of the appellants is available. Sri Virupaksha Dattatreya Gouda, learned counsel for the appellants, requests to dismiss this appeal recording the fact that this dispute is settled outside the Court and that the respondent No.2 has executed two sale deeds in respect of the plaint schedule property – one in favour of the wife and son of deceased-appellant No.3 under registered sale deed No.4576 of 2021, dated 01.5.2021; and another in favour of the son of appellant No.1 under registered sale deed No.4573 of 2021, dated 01.5.2021, for valid sale consideration. 2. Original memo contained two sale deeds with the same document numbers “No.4576 of 2021, dated 01.5.2021”. Learned counsel for the appellants clarifies that the second sale deed executed in favour of the son of the appellant No.1 is bearing No.4573 of 2021 dated 01.5.2021. A copy of the corrected memo is filed by him now. 3. In view of the same and since the matter is adjusted outside the Court in terms stated, this Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs. All pending petitions stand closed. Interim orders, if any, granted stand closed. ___________________________ M. VENKATA RAMANA, J July 23, 2021 vasu