Maia IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER: Janak Ram Pandey, aged about 58 years S/O Shri Gowardhan Prasad Pandey, working as Assistant Grad HI, Tairshii ofsce, Patthalgaon District—Jashpur Nagar. (C.G.). // RESEONQENTS: 1. State of C.G. Through: The Secretary, Department of Transport, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) State of’C,G. Through z The Secretary, Rajasv Avam Apda Prabandhan Vibhag, D.KS‘ Bhawan Raipur, 4. Secretary, Urban Administration and D.K.S Development Department, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 5. Collector, Kabirdham, District— Kabirdham, (C‘G.) 6. Collector, Jashpur, District — Jashpur, (C.G.) / na»940§\7/& VA / é a; l 07?; Chhattisgarh In&astructure Development Carporafmn, Through its Managing Director C.I.D.C Sastri Chawk, Raipur, ~ (ca); Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Mastrucmre Development Department, Divisional Office, Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION _ OFQ INDIA. FOR, THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NAWVOFHMANDAMUS CERTIORARJA PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR, ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONsr: T EWWWW . Lo POM» $90»? H WW 0 m W >m () This ‘ . WOwowh .. W200 WW mm (13W) mmm r2- absorbed in various de impiementation of the Ab WWW wmm WW WW $dmm No.97/201O (State of Chhattisga decided on 27/8I2D1CI to the effect particuiar department or instiiuie forwarded the case of the petitione‘ be considered in accordance with i Having regard to the facts the case of absorption of the i V absorption and poiicy decision of ti’ With the aforesaid observat Dsepii 'for consideration. Learned State counsel submits that the case of the petitioner wouid aiso A i ons, the petiti§tinaily disposed of. Sd/— v Maniridra Mohan Shrivastava Judge WWW, W—Fsmo—z/zm 1—1,so,ooo. t partments of the Government in orption Peiicy and that the petitioner is going to retire on 31st ugust, ZG’tG, it is directed that the case of the petitioner for bsorption shali be considered by the concerned respondent a thermos strictly in acoOrdance with the Ruies of Absorption ramed by the respondent No.1, as expeditiousiy as possibie. ., Learned counsel for the etitioner submits that the petitioner is also simiiarly situated and therefore, di ction may be issued for consideration of his case for absorption in tenns of the olicy of the State Government at the eariiest, as the petitioner is going to retir on 36/06/2311. The order dated 6/8/2mt‘) passed in A.K. Dwivedi (Supra) as further been clarmed in Review Petition and Others v. A.K.Dwivedi and another) that there was no direction for absorption in a He further submits that iocai body has situation of the case, as aforestated, as the petitioner is going to retire on 30i0?f1 1, the respondent authorities may consider )etitioner, in accordance with the rules of e State, as ordered in A.K.Dwivedi (supra).