IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35889 of 2008 SIDHESHWAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.09.2008 Heard. The case is under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had chased Deepak Yadav and fired on him, but Deepak Yadav escaped and the shot fired by this petitioner caused fire arm injury on the back of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that dispute between the parties due to election is admitted in the FIR itself. Further submission is that the petitioner has been implicated due to that dispute. It is also submitted that the pillet injury was simple in nature. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year of incarceration. Kundan (C. M. Prasad, J.)