L^PC^ 11^1/05 A995 PBS'ITIOI'aS&S 32 S tii rh about 33 :»poste t » * 11 n.p S.BohaB, s/o shci Kawalram Yadav» aged about 35 yeaESi M ^ »t-«, Secretary, Departmant of T 2, Sbiv Nath Mandal,0"E9*M.P. lcfc t 4«Sub Divisional offieer, Divisioa NO.1 3odla» M.P* 5.3ub-Divisional Officer, wafcar Resources.t Ghhirpani Aouvibhag so.2, Ra.jaandgaon* M •P • »»•»•» ngiaai-flla»I i;BIIIRi>l>rijllu i!i: iC—78 sii^r w R-ii* tTO5tI^l!B1 A ^5ET "lll^lcf'4, ®T1'1'y<l6,fadl'My _..Ml..y)...^l^ 311^1'q^q? (1Ng»I?;I) &-W|t)R ^ffea ^k^l tuiiAJf • &A 02.09.3009 Shri Amit Verma., couns SIi-ri.'Vivek Siis.nsi's-. P.L; •Case of the petitionerst Lsbour/ ChoukM&i's in ihe ye^ posxs tiil issuaace 01 terintt! thereafter tlie other tenairtati(tn Counsel for fhe terrauiation order dated 4.8. 5.9.1995 and on tlie strenl petitioners coatm.ued on. fb.| second termiaation ori.er stayed later on by order d^ petitioners furtb.er subiaits i\ has issued a circular aad tak4 of fhe persons who were ap^ those who are working for thel petiltione subsequ^nt in view of th.e subseque fl^e circular dated 5.3.2008 petitioners submits that he a petition with Hbe'rty to luake respondents seekmg regulariz a diicction to tlie conceraed r< +l*tid4l'i "RFRff ^f fs*<^ <f^it^K ^ 3tfW37lt?[ ;1 for fhe oetitioiiers. ihr- t'h.= %tctt-f=1 101' ilS is fha.t thev were appouiied as 1989 aad corLTiaued on the said ation order dated 4.8.1995 and order dated 31. l.2000. tioners subiaits that tbe first .995 was stayed bv fhis Court on yh of fhe said stay order fhe ; said posts tiU passing of ftie 31.1.2000 which was also ited. 16.2.2000. Counsel for the lat on 5.3.2008 the Govemiaeat :n a decisios to consider the cases !eiiited prior to 1998 and also of dtited last ten yeai~s. ;qu4n.t developnieuts aiid issuance of at tliis stage counsel tor fiie |ay be permitted to withdraw this t representation to fb.e conceiTied ariz^tion of service. He aiso prays for [spondents to consider tb.e case of '^TB^T^FIKfetf 1-iH illliBt RlffifeJted»i**.d •:v^^s. '.^^ -^ an^[ q;T (<;-ii°(i ( 'tTSff STI^T sh*llq'i 4|- 'TSI '^W\v\ii, •&v\wi<a, hwwy. _........k4:£..^.)....^/0^. / 3n^I'(T^T (l?tl«Citl) WIIW ^ftti 3lA?I •a.- fhe petitioners ia. fee Ugbt of tiji circulars issued 'by the Goveruij 1imit niav also be fixed for det petiuoaers. To this prayer of co-uiisel for the respondeats/ Sti( Accordiilgly, fhe petition Hberty as aforesaid. If tfae peti't| the conceraed respondents wit) receipt of copy of this order, exuected tQ decide fhe sasie -d inontlis froia the date of its rei i.e legal posinon aiid the various tent. He subiuits that soine tmie :idiag tlie representa.tion of the the counsel for the T>etitioners, \cte has no objection. lis dismissed as witlidrawii wifh loiiers niaKe a represeutaQoa to bin oue laonfh from. the date of |tlie concemed respondeats are dfh.ui a further period of three |;eipt strictly in. accoiuan.ee with This Court has not expres the ca.se aad the authorities e K'presentation of f&e petitioner; taking irito consideration the respect of regularization ofgove cbl'yld^'l w^v^ ^ "fe^ <pt|<^i< ^affin sii^i Ised aav opinioa on fhe inerits of bnceraed are free to decide the su'icftv ia accordaiice witll law ;irculars and ttie guidelitifis in jnruent eiuplQyees. •.. Sd/- pritinkerDiwakar Judge •4'iii.