M w Q3 €%fm% \ fggw ggm In thg Hon’pk High Court of Judicature of Chhattisggrh at X'I W.P.NO. Bilasgur (CG) 71’? ff 2006 C 5 ) Petitioner } Chaitram Chandrakar, aged 49 yeaxsw {z / w Son of Shri Patiram Chandrakar, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Boys Primary School, Chankhuri, R/o Village Oteband, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ~1. The State Govemmont of Chhattisgaxh, t Through — The Secretary, ‘ Tribal Welfare Department Minisoy, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Ofiicer, Durg V 3. Block Education Officer, JEW, District Durg (C‘G.) 5V Writ Petition Under Articles 226(227 at The Canstitutivn 01 India Prohibition tor the issuance and at for WRIT other in suitable the nature writ at or MANDAMUS writs. order certioraril or order; t l direction or directions. #frf_ Wf!’ ‘ m , , ( j ) g HE6H CGURT OF CHHATTIS§ARH AT BILA SPUR W, P. (s) No. 4951 cf 2006 Pe‘ri'fibner : Chaifmm Chandrakar- Versus Responden-rs : Stafe 59w. of Chhaf‘risgarh 6: others Singk Batch: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusiice 5a1§sh K. Agnilwtri. Shri May Shrivas‘mva, Iidvoou‘re for 1‘he Peii‘rioner. 5min Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt Advocafe far fhe respondenfs/Sfa‘te. O R D E R (11m Semember, 2006) Ia Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits tha'!’ whi!e working as Assisi'an‘f Tzachari the pafitionzr has gone on framing 1'0 improve his quaHfiL-afions on his own expenses and acquired B‘Tl. Emminafion 5er1’ifiaa1’e in fhg year 1992 from the Board (if Higher 5ec9ndary Educaiion, Mudhya Pradesh, Bhopal. According ‘ro learned ceungei far the petifimer, fhe petitioner is emifled +0 :Pwo advance increments in view ef the decisizm 9 f this Court in the case of Yeshwent Kumar Bharedwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, burg and another- {2006 (II) MPJR-56 96}. This {hurt in the 5:15.. ef Yeshwant Kumar Bhemdwaj Vs. Municipal €arecmtion. Durg and another (Supra), came to the ‘)is @ condusion Thai fhe feacher-s, who had obtained B.T.I. Examinafion Cerfifica're on his own expenses, are cavered by fhe circular- dafed 24.12.98 (Annexure P/Z) issued by fhe S'mfe. Govammem of Madhya Pradesh Learned counsel for The pe'rifioner fur'rher- submi'fs Tha'r 'I'he facts and question of law involved in fhe presem' case are squarely covered by decision of ihis Cour‘l’ in The case of Yashwan't Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipa! Corpora‘rion, Durg and anofher (Supra), +0 which learned counsel appearing for the respondenfs fair!y concedes and agrees wi'rh fhe avermen+ made by !earned counsel appearing for fhe pefi'noner. Accordingly, fhe wri‘r petition is aHowed in terms of 'l'he order passed in ‘Hqe case af Yashwan'!’ Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpora'fion, Durg and’anofher (Supra), subjecf f0 verifica'l'ion“ of “the faci' as 'l’o whether fhe pe‘l'i‘l’ioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Cerfifica‘l’e on his own expenses or not No order u/ as fo costs. J Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur r