IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.385 OF 2008 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO.61 OF 2003 IN SESSIONS CASE NO.565 OF 1998 Dhirajlal @ Dhirubhai Thadeshwar .. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.Vipul Jain h/f.I.A.Bagari for the Applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : MARCH 31ST, 2009. P.C. Present Application is filed for restoration of earlier dismissed criminal Revision No.61 of 2003 dated 26th March, 2004. The dismissal was ordered as the office objections are not removed within stipulated period by the Advocate for the Petitioner. 1 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. Ms. Shinde for the Respondent State. It appears that along with the present criminal Revision No.61 of 2003 there is another criminal Revision No. 57 of 2003 preferred by another accused. Both these Revisions challenging the order of rejection of respective discharge applications rejected by Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the offences punishable under section 364, 365, 387 read with section 34of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It appears that the stay to the proceeding before Sessions Court is already granted by this Court. In order not to waste any more time, both the criminal Revision Applications can be taken up for final hearing as similar such order was passed by this Court dated 7th July, 2008. In the meantime, till next date whatever office objections which are yet required to be cured by the applicant those shall be removed. 5. In view of the above directions, present applications for restoration are allowed and disposed of. Criminal Revision Application No.61 of 2007 be restored to the file and be sent to the appropriate Court alongwith criminal Revision Application No.57 of 2003. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) 2 3