IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3313 of 2009 RAM LAKHAN SINGH Versus MAGADH UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 2. 19.3.2009 Heard Mr. Dinu Kumar, counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Binay Kant Mani Tripathi, counsel for the Magadh University as also counsel for the State. The petitioner has retired from service on 29th February, 1992 and he still feels that something more is payable to him on the head of retirement benefit. As a matter of fact this Court would find that the only grievance of the petitioner which can be legitimately looked into is one which has been raised in paragraph 1 to the writ application pertaining to amount of revised pension confined to Rs. 34,160/- as raised in the said representation. This Court therefore would make it clear that only the claim as highlighted in Annexure 1 of the writ petition has to be considered and disposed of by the Registrar of the University who must pass a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of 2 this order and if any amount is found payable in terms of the aforesaid decision the same may also be paid to the petitioner in the next one month. This application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/