- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.83 OF 2000 FROM ORDER NO.83 OF 2000 FROM ORDER NO.83 OF 2000 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2005. : FEBRUARY 15, 2005. : FEBRUARY 15, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the Appellants. The Appeal is preferred by the original Plaintiffs for challenging the order dated 18th January 2000. By the impugned order, in the Notice of Motion taken out by the Appellants ad-interim relief has been refused. From 18th January 2000 till today there is no ad-interim relief operating in favour of the Appellants. Hence, Appeal cannot be entertained. Appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. 2. It is obvious that the Notice of Motion, if pending, and the suit filed by the Appellants will be decided by the trial Court on its own merit without being influenced by the impugned order and the confirmation thereof by this Court. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.