IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6785 of 2011 Decided on: 25.8.2011 Smt. Kamlesh Naryal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, CJ (oral) The petitioner has two grievances:- I) Her JBT service is not counted as qualifying service. II) The ad hoc service followed by regular service as OT is not counted for the purpose of annual increments. 2. As far as JBT service is concerned, the same would count for the purpose of pension being qualifying service, but not for the purpose of increments. As far as ad hoc service followed by regular service is concerned, the same would count both for pension and increments, in view of the decision of this Court in LPA NO. 36 of 2010. The needful, in the light of what is held 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? above, shall be done within a period of four months from the -2- date of production of a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 25, 2011 (Bhupender/K. Attri)