IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.129 of 2010 MD. MUNNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is not only a juvenile rather below 12 years at the time of incident which minimizes the gravity of the offence levelled against him. Kidnapping of the informant’s son is reported, which is submitted working somewhere in Delhi and petitioner’s bail is refused by Juvenile Justice Board taking into consideration the nature of the offence and further probability of mixing in gang of criminals. In appeal his age at time of passing the order 19 years has further been taken as one of the grounds for in the circumstance stated above. Petitioner remained in custody since 12.1.2009 which entitles him for bail which has not been considered either by the Juvenile Justice Board or by the appellate Court. This revision application is allowed. The order dated 5.12.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 2009 passed by Govind Prasad Singh, Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Munger and the order dated 16.3.2009 in Cr. R. Case No. 21A/2001 passed 2 by Juvenile Justice Board, Munger , is set aside. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Munger in G.R. No. 21A/01, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his father who shall keep the petitioner under his observation and produce him whenever he is required in this case. P. Kumar (Mandhata Singh, J.)