Cr. Rev. No. 156 of 2010. 25.4.2011 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Petitioners namely Govind Singh, Rattan Singh and Suresh Singh in person. Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate for the applicants/complainants. Complainant Siya Ram and Madan Singh, injured in person. Ms. Subh Mahajan, Dy. A.D. for the respondent. Cr. M. P. No. 237 of 2011. This application has been preferred under Section 320 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by complainant Siya Ram (PW1) and Madan Singh, injured PW2 in the case.. The petitioners were convicted by both the Courts below under Sections 452, 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and were ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs.500/- under Section 452/34, IPC and six months and fined Rs.250/- under Section 342/34, IPC and in default of payment of fine, the order of the trial Court was retained. The story as set out by the prosecution against the petitioners are that on 9.8.2001 Siya Ram son of Shri Madan Singh, resident of Village Chamiara, Tehsil and Police Station Shillai, District Sirmour, H. P. lodged FIR No. 46 of 2001 under Sections 452, 324/34, IPC at Police Station, Shillai on the allegations that they were resident of Chamiara and engaged in the occupation of agriculture. There was some dispute with respect to the land for which the petitioners assaulted injured and complainants. The applicants pleaded that now the matter has been sorted out between the parties and the petitioners have tendered unconditional apology before the gathering of the village elders and have undertaken and promised not to act in this manner in future. Both complainants Siya Ram and Madan Singh are present in the Court today and their statements on oath have been recorded separately. They have supported the averments made in the application. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both complainants. They stated that they have made their statements without any pressure, inducement or threat of any kind whatsoever. In this view of the matter, this application is allowed and permission to compound the offences is granted. I am supported by a decision of the Full Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kulvinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another, (2007- 3) 147 PLR 439. The necessary consequences under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall ensue. Criminal revision and all pending applications disposed of accordingly. (Dev Darshan Sud),J. April 25th , 2011. (jai)