.I , ) I ,1R nd aanr UO-U6.IUUf Present : FJane for the peiiiioner [',4r UCay Gupta for respondent No.1 l'triC) tr-o. 5379i2000 There is no appearance on behalf of the peiitioner, This posiiion has coniinues' since the year 2003. The peiiiioner seeks to impugn the appointment of respondent lrJo.z as Junior weH*, The ground of challenge is that ihe said respondent was ineligihle io appiy in ihe Sshedule Trihe caiegory, The alfegaiion made is that the petitioner was ihe only ST candidaie and that the second respond.eni is from ihe sc category and noi ST category. The other ground is that the ceriificate supplied by ihe respondent irJo.? was false ancj coufd not have treen reiied upon. A noiificaiion/document annexed along wiih the petition as Annexure-E discloses that.k?rarr exciuding ihose in SC's are considered at Scheduie Trihes. Learned counsel appearing on behaif of the respondents submiis thai the second respandent was in fact from the communiiy known as .tr#rana which is a Scheciule Tribe, fJe has produced a copy crf the saici ceriificate for that purpose, In view of the above position and having regard io the thai the appointment was made sometime in ihe year 1gg7 qnd grievance in ihese proceedings was raised in 2000, the petiticrn dismissed rh,J^M*L s.RAVli.IDRA BHAT, J. AUGUST 08, ?OO5 nllIttvt act ihe is SACHKHAND Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified