THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.452 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners-Accused approach this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.157 of 2008 of Changomla Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The fore father of the complainant late Sri Nagi Reddy, S/o.Venkat Reddy had land admeasuring Ac.13.08 guntas in Sy.No.286/1 sitauted at Pedda Ummenthala Villge, Pudur Mandal and after his death, the complainant and others got the said land as his legal representatives and the revenue authorities also issued pattadar pass books and title deeds in their favour. On 08.08.2008 when the complainant went to the office of Tahsildar for the purpose of certified copies of the pahanies, he came to know that petitioners 1 to 3 herein without any manner of right sold away the land in Sy.No.286/1 admeasuring Ac.13.08 guntas, in favour of petitioners 4 and 5 by playing fraud and got registered the document No.3944/2007. Basing on those documents, they are making attempts to get the names of petitioners 4 and 5 by deleting the names of complainant and others. Hence, the complaint. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly conceded that as far as petitioners 4 and 5 are concerned, they are genuine purchasers. Without knowing the dispute between the petitioners and the respondents, they purchased the land. In view of the same, the present complaint on the file of Changomla police station in Crime No.157 of 2008 is hereby quashed against petitioners 4 and 5. As far as petitioners 1 to 3 are concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that they purchased the land from the father of the present respondent-complainant on 16.03.1971 and also they are in possession and they attain the pattadar passbook also and the same is now under challenge before the Joint Collector and in view of the same, no offence is committed by the petitioners herein. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent- complainant submitted that no such sale deed was in existence and that the said sale deed is not executed by the respondent’s father in the year 1971. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that original suits are pending before the civil Court arising out of the same issue. This Court heard the entire arguments and perused the records. The genuineness of the allegations cannot be looked into by this Court. Whether the allegations are false or true to be investigated by the investigating officer. Hence, this Court is of the view that this is not the stage to interfere with the investigation. Hence, this Court is not inclined to pass any order as prayed by petitioners 1 to 3. In any event, considering the submissions made by the petitioners counsel, the respondent-Inspector of police, the investigating officer is hereby directed to collect all the material papers produced by the petitioners herein to ascertain the genuineness of the allegations in the complaint and after completion of the same, file final report either way before the concerned Court. With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. ___________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Date: 29.07.2010 Rns