IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29431 of 2011 Date of decision : December 06, 2011 Kulwinder Singh and others ....Petitioners versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. DS Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab with Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for the complainant L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Accused Kulwinder Singh and three others have filed this petition for anticipatory bail in cross version under sections 324, 323, 34 IPC and section 326 IPC added subsequently of case FIR No. 49 dated 26.8.2011 under sections 341, 324, 323, 336 IPC and section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Dhilwan, District Kapurthala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Grievous hurt caused by sharp weapon falling within the purview of section 326 IPC is attributed to petitioner no. 1 Kulwinder Singh. Therefore, in my opinion, he does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. However, only simple injuries are attributed to petitioners no. 2 to 4. Criminal Misc. No. M-29431 of 2011 -2- Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Balwinder Singh, stated that pursuant to interim order of this Court, petitioners no. 2 to 4 have already joined investigation. In my opinion, they deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. In view of the aforesaid, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant petition qua petitioner no. 1 is dismissed whereas the instant petition qua petitioners no. 2 to 4 namely Paramjit Singh alias Karamjit Singh, Baljit Singh and Lashkar Singh is allowed. Interim order dated 19.10.2011 is made absolute. ( L.N. Mittal ) December 06, 2011 Judge 'dalbir'