1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (Z) NO.550/2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.54/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.943/1996 (D) [Deoram Kisanji Chandewar .vrs. Navodit Education Society and others] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 10, 2011. Heard Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, Shri Ansari, learned counsel holding for Shri H.D. Dangre, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2, Shri A.S. Fulzele, learned AGP for respondent nos.3 and 4 and Shri Prashant N. Shende, learned counsel for respondent no.5. Perused the application which seeks disposal of appeal in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise are incorporated in application itself. The application is signed by respondent nos.1 and 2, 2 their counsel, appellant and his counsel. Learned AGP for respondent nos.3 and 4 and learned counsel for respondent no.5 state that they are not aware of any such compromise. It is apparent that appeal filed by respondent no.5 challenging his termination was pending before the School Tribunal and after its disposal, the said respondent is challenging it before the High Court. In this situation, without prejudice to the rights of respondent nos.1, 2 and 5 and without casting any obligation upon respondent no.3, the application is allowed. Compromise, as produced, is taken on record. The appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms thereof. The appeal is thus partly allowed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande