^<i;::^^Ks:^:S^aj'^ti ^•^^-^j'o-u^^~/;y*'^'S'iirysww$ ^''••B^W-sWsK.Wft ~l"'"s^^^^^^is HON'BLE IN THE HIGHCOURTOF CHMffmSHGARH AT BllASl*U /Y[^-C^W^/ff?[~~ <^(C) NO.-556/200S) APPELLANT ^FSE OMENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THROUGH DIVISIONALMANAGER,DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO.-2, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CHAWLA COMPLEX, DEVENDRA NAGAR ROAD, RAIPUR, TAH. & DISTT.-RAIPUR C.G. (INSURER FOR TRUCK N0.- C.G. 04 G70532 AND BOXER MOTOR CYCLE N0.- C.G. 04 C/2212) -*"i x ft:» m •>-':' ^RESPONDENTS ^ Vrs. SMT. KIRAN SAHU AGE ABQUT 29 yrs., WIDOW LATE DINESH SAHU '?.^../-'^" ^•t "5> 2. ESHWARYA KUMARSAHC AGE ABOUT 3jYRS. S/0 LATEDINESH SAHU. RESPONDENT NO.-l) AND 2 R/0 VILLAGE KHAMHARDIH, SHANKAR NAGAR, RAIPLTR, TAH, & MSTT.- RArPUR (C.&) MINOR RESPONDENT NO.-2 GCARGIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.-l SMT. KIRANSAHD PARAMJEET SINGH AGE ABOUT 40 YRS. S/0 HARBAKHSHSINGH, R/0 HOUSENO.- C.H.440, M.P. HOUSING BOARD COLONY , TATIBANDH THANA AMANAKA RAIPUR. , TAH. & DISTT. BILASPUR C.G. (OWNEROF VEHICLE TRUCK NO.-C.G. 04 G-0532) PARASNATH SAHU S/0 LATE PITAMBAR SAHU AGE ABOUT 38 YRS, R/0 VILLAGE KHAMHARDm, RAIPUR, TAH. & DISTT.- RAIPUR C.G.(OWNER OFVEHICLE BAJAJBOXER MOTOR CYCLE N0- C.G. 04 C/2212) APPEAL UNDERSECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 * -te£ Respondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DS^: Hon'bleShri Justice I.IVI. Quddusi and Hon'bleShriJusticePrashantKumar Mishra IVIiscettaneoUs ApReal (C.)No.746^t20Q7 The Orientallnsurance Co. Ltd. versus Smt. Kiran Sahu and others Present: Shri Sudhir Agrawal, counsel for the appellant, Shri Shivendu Pandya, counsel fpr respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Basant Kaiwartya, counsel forrespondent No.4. None forrespondentNo.S. i 1 MiscelianeoysARBeaLynder_Sectiori173 ofthe_Motor Vehicies Act ORAL ORDER (Passed on 22nd February, 2011) Per I.WI. Quddusi, J.: Heard. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company challenging the awarddated 1-2-2007 passedby the 8t Additional Moto.r Accidents Claims Tribunal, F.T.C., Raipur in Claim Case No.60/2006 on the ground that theclaim petition was filed by the insured but subsequentty he died and as such the legat representatjves of the insured are^not entitled to get the compensation. r 3. Brief facts of the case, according to the claimants, in short, are that on the date of accident, i.e,, 24-8-2002, at about 11 P.M., deceased Dinesh Kumar Sahu, having got seated his friend Liladhar Sinha behind him on a motor cycle Bajaj Boxer bearing registration leBai siq o\ aAiAjns (ou p|noM pue IUBLUIBIO sqi ^o qteep eq} uo sieqe p|noM )ov 94t P 991. uoiioos Jspun ps|y Ajnfui |euosj9d jo^ aiiep e )eqi p|8L| usaqseL) 11 qoiqM ui 'ge dlftl ZOOZ yiV 'sjai^o pue niqeg 'SA jeiiioue pue ieg iiBMBeqg "lius u! tjnoo q6jH L|S8pejd eAqpB|/\| sq) jo uoispsp qouag ||nj QIQ p MeiA ui 'jeqynj 'g •^661. 'se|ny S3101149A JQIO|/\| qjeBsiueqqo/qsepejd eAtjpe|/\| 04} p gzz S|ny pue )QV 34t P 891. uo'PSS -ispun pspiAOjd 96 leunquj.sLuieio aqi Aq auop eq 0} Ajinbua ^o JsueLU e si siqi -}ou jossunfu! ^o }[nsej e SB eoe|d >|OQ} qiesp eq) jaijtaifm 01 se umou^f }ou si t| •s •AuedLuoo souejnsui/iueLUiep -UOU 3L|) UO UOIlBSUSdLUOO Q^ Aed 0} At!|!qe![ Guipioy nqeg jELun» LjseuiQ p9seso9p eq) ^o uos pue S^IM ''s'! 'stUBLUiep aqi ^o jnoABj ui -/009'8Z'£'syP Luns e pepJBMe [eunqui SLUIEIQ e^i •^ '-/000'09'91-'SyP UOj)BSU8dlU03 BUILUIBIO pSJJSpjdSBM (,PV 941, M(J0^93uaq)8961. 'toy sspiqeA -ioto|/\| sq} ^o 991, uoitoeg japun uoiiBoiidde uy 'tuaLu^eaj) 6uunp peip 9|-| 'BMO|/\| uoiieig aoiiod SL|t o) pepodej SGM lueppui SL)} pue }ueuJiB3J} jo^ peziietidsoLj SBM 8|-| 'iuspiooe sq( ui uosjsd 314 uo seunfui snoAauB psuietsns nqes Jeiunx LISSUIQ '^onj) sq) q}iM peysep pue epAo JO}OLU eqi uo psoueieqLU] }o6 nqeg jeujn^ qseuiQ '>|onjt aL]} p Gui^jed tus6!]B9u 0} 9hQ •A|)U86!|6au ||i|/\| eoiy ueise|/\| jeeu uoiiipuoo }je}s ui pe^jed SBM zggo 3 t'o OO'ON uo!iejtsi63J Buueeq ^om} e 'peoy jezeg Bpoieg - jndiey uo 'SLU!! )BL|) }v '-indiey 01 eqepjeN 86e|[!/\ LUOJJ 6uiiuo3 SGM 'iuiq Aq ueAup Buioq 'zi.gz 3 t'o OO'ON z y. i:.,:,»p31 ^-c ;T—..-^1'"SS" '-'^..•-.IL^'Sil1''" llall Gopal representatives exceptas regards the elaim for pecuniary loss tothe estate of the claimant. In fhe instant case, it is necessary to determine by the Claims Tribunal as to whether the death of the insured was as a result of injuries sustained in the accident in question. 7. In view of the above, we allow the miscellaneous appeal in part, set aside the impugned award and remit thematter back to the Claims Tribunal to decide it afresh in the light ofthe observations made above. The record of the Claims Tribunal shall be sent back without delay. The parties shall appear before the Claims Tribunal 1 . • ' .. •• on 15th April, 2011. The parties shall be alloived to amend their pleadings, adduce further evidence, file doeuments or get the documents verified and thereafter decision shall be taken afresh. The amount which is in deposit shall remainin deposit and shall not be disbursed to anyone till a fresh award ismade. However, the amount shall be deposited by the Claims Tribunal in anationalized Bank in a fixed deposit scheme. There shall be no order as tocosts. =J' ' Sd/- ^ LM-Quddusi 1, Judge :f '/ Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ;1,,"1-