1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1950 OF 2010 (Sayyed Farooque Sayyad Usman vs. S.D.O. Buldhana & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 17, 2010. Heard Shri Palshikar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Respondent No. 2, who has become owner of land under Section 49-A of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, sought permission under Section 57 of the Act read with Rule 31(A(e) to sell part of it. That permission has been granted by S.D.O. by impugned order dated 20.05.2003 that order has been maintained by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal vide its judgment dated 02.02.2010. The contention of the petitioner is, he is ex-owner of that land and, therefore, he is entitled to its restoration. The authorities have found that the petitioner could not establish that he is ex-owner of the land and in any case he has no connection with that land now. Before this Court the petitioner has produced a copy of sale deed dated 02.05.1969 and according to him as per that sale deed his grand mother purchased the property in dispute. 2 In view of the orders passed under Section 49A of the Act, it is apparent that the sale is totally irrelevant. The petitioner has not produced before this Court any orders passed under Section 49A confirming ownership upon Respondent No.2 and the petitioner has not disclosed whether he has challenged that order at any time. In view of this position, I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.