HJGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR DJVISIONBENCH CORAM: HGN'BLESHRIRA^EEVGUPTA,e.J.& HON'BLESHRIRANGNATHCHANDRAKAR,J. Misc. Appeal No.1093 of 2004 Appellants Claimants 1. c ;' -: (, 2. 3. 4. h: ^l' Respondents Non-appljcants '^".k- Ramkumari Soriwani wd of Purushottam Lal Sonwani, aged aboutSSyears. Ku. Gyan Sonwani D/o Purushottam Lalagedabout17years. Harish Sonwani S/o PLurushottam Lal.agecjabout 14years, Romart Kumar S/o Purushottam La! agedaboutlSyeai's, AppjiGant No. 2, 3 & 4 are represented by Mbther Rarrikymari Sonwani wd pf Puryshottam l-al, Al! Tesidence 6f vi|lage Chherikhedi, P.0. Mandir IHasaud, P.S. Telibandha, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur ;.<C.G.);1':-,,-^^ VERSUS Sardar Pal Singh S/o Bachhan Singh R/o P.VV.D. Road Kolkata 35, through Kolkataj Road jines, Bhanpurl Rjng Road no.2, P.0; Birgaon, Raipur,C.G. Pappu Singh S/o Amrika Singh, R/o 1/1A Chemik Street, Kolkata, Ring Road no.2, P.0. Bii^aon, Raipur, 'C.G.^'.-.,. -,:;:1.-- :. •-:: The United Iridia Insurance Company. 102 A Sri Ariyinda Sarani, KolKata, Hath Bagan through D.M. Kutchhari Chowk, Madina Manjil, Rajpur, distt. Raipur (C.G.) Budhram Sonwanl S/o Nunau Ram Sonwani, agedSOyears, <:::.^ c €• ^ 6. Bhagwati W/o Budhram Sonwani aged 55 yeare, both are R/o Nava Gaon, P.0. Godi, dist. Raipur, C.G. Ram BaiW/o Purushottam Sonwani, R/o vill. Bohardih, P.0. Palaud, Raipur, C.G. ApDeai underSectiQn 173 ofthelVlotorVehiclesAct. 1988 Present: Shri S.C. Verma, CQunsel for theappetlants. Shri Dashrath Gupta, counsel forrespondent No.3. ORDER ^th (28tn0ctober,2010) The foliowjng order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Shri Dashrath Gupta, learnedcounsel for respondent No.3 the United India Insurance Company Limited, points out that appellants No.2|Ku. Gyan Sonwani, No.3 Harish Sonwani and No.4 Roman Kumar, before filing of this appeal for enhancement on 17-09-2004, hadfiled another appeal for enhancement on 10-08-2004, whichcame to be registered as M.A.No. 930/2004 and is pending for hearing. 2) Shri S.C. Verma, learned counsel for the appellants, in view of the aboye fact, seeks permission towithdraw the appeal filed by the appellants' for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, vide award dated 15.04.2004, passed in Claim Case No.02/^Q3^with _ the liberty of representing appeitants No.2 c. -^' Ku. Gyan Sonwani, No.3 Harish Sonwani and No.4 Roman Kumar in M.A.No. 930/2004. 3) Permissiongranted. 4) With the above iiberty, the appeai is disr^issed as withdrawn. 5) The Tribunal's records received in this appeal be tagged withM.A.No. 930/2004. Sd/- ChiefJustice 7 subbu Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge jy T^^ ci ~:"! 1