IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1737 of 2007 RAJENDRA SINGH Versus SITA DEVI ----------- 3 28.8.2008 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. A finding of the court below holding the petitioner being an unfaithful son and a dishonest husband, does not need any interference by this Court specially when it is found that he is not even maintaining his mother and his wife. There being ample evidence on record that the petitioner is employed in the Government as a Constable and thus in a position to meet the expenses of maintenance so granted for his wife to the tune of Rs. 5,000/- per month, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, this civil revision application being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed and the Court below is directed to ensure that both the arrear and current amount of the monthly maintenance as directed by it in the impugned order is realized from petitioner within a period one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order failing which the Director General of Police is directed to deduct the said amount and pay the same to the wife of the petitioner as directed by the Court below. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)