IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.24 of 2008 VIJOY KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE BALMIKI PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA GACHHI TOLA, P.S. AND DISTRICT BEGUSARAI-------PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DR. MISHRILAL THAKUR, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 3. DR. NARESH KUMAR JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE GRGISTRAR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 4. SRI UDAY CHANDRA JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE FINANCE OFFICER, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 5. DR. BALMIKI PRASAD SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PRINCIPAL, GANESH DUTT COLLEGE, BEGUSARAI --------------------CONTEMNORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. WITH MJC No.25 of 2008 CHIRANJIVI PRASAD SINHA, SON OF LATE HARI NANDAN PRASAD SINHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA HANAKH, P.S. AND DISTRICT BEGUSARAI ------------------PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DR. MISHRILAL THAKUR, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 3. DR. NARESH KUMAR JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE GRGISTRAR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 4. SRI UDAY CHANDRA JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE FINANCE OFFICER, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 5. DR. BALMIKI PRASAD SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PRINCIPAL, GANESH DUTT COLLEGE, BEGUSARAI --------------------CONTEMNORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. WITH MJC No.26 of 2008 SURENDRA PRASAD CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE YUGAL PRASAD CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA GACHHI TOLA, P.S. AND DISTRICT BEGUSARAI -------------------PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DR. MISHRILAL THAKUR, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 3. DR. NARESH KUMAR JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE GRGISTRAR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 4. SRI UDAY CHANDRA JHA, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE FINANCE OFFICER, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 5. DR. BALMIKI PRASAD SINGH, SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PRINCIPAL, GANESH DUTT COLLEGE, BEGUSARAI --------------------CONTEMNORS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. WITH MJC No.2829 of 2005 DR.HEM NATH JHA, SON OF SHRI SHULPANI JAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALHA SOUTH, P.O. BALHA, NORTH, P.S. RAJ NAGAR, DISTRICT MADHUBANI ----------------PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HIGHTER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. - 2 - 2. DR. RAJMANI PRASAD, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, VICE CHANCELLOR, L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA 3. DR. KUMARESH PRASAD SINGH, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGISTRAR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 4. SHRI RITESH CHANDRA JHA, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FINANCE OFFICER, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 5. PROF. KEDAR NATH JHA, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL, HARSH PATI SINGH COLLEGE, MADHEPUR(MADHUBANI), L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA-----------OPPOSITE PARTIES. WITH MJC No.2647 of 2007 PROF.SATYA NARAIN TEWARY, SON OF LATE KESHAV PRASAD TWEARY, NAYA GANGA SAGAR NEAR MARWARI COLLEGE, DARBHANGA, UNDER LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, RETIRED AS PROFESSOR, P.G. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY FROM L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA, DISTRICT DARBHANGA ------------------PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR (SRI RAJMANI PD. SINGH) L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 3. THE REGISTRAR (SRI KUMARESH PRASAD SINGH) L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA 4. THE FINANCE OFFICER(SRI RATISH KUMAR JHA) L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA------------------OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 14. 30.03.2009. Counsel for the University, Shri Partha Sarthi states that the admitted dues of the petitioners have already been cleared and information to that effect has been given to them under letters dated 21.3.2009 and 19.3.2009. He has also produced the two letters. Let those letters be taken on record and in view of the contents of the letters counsel for the petitioners have chosen to withdraw these contempt applications, which are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to dispute the contents of the aforesaid letters before the competent authorities, if they are aggrieved thereby. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)