IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2311 of 2006 RAMESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA, S/o Late Chit Lal Sah, R/o Village – Bishunpura Bakhraur, P.S. Sidhwalia, Distt. – Gopalganj …………………………………………...…. Plaintiff…. Petitioner. Versus 1. RAMASHISH PRASAD, S/o late Chit Lal Sah, 2. Most. Maheshi Devi, W/o late Basudeo Prasad Sah, 3. Chandra Prakash Gupta, 4. Om Prakash Gupta, 5. Prem Nath Prasad, 6. Amar Nath Gupta, 7. Prabhu Nath Prasad, 8. Santosh Kumar Gupta, O.P. Nos. 3 to 8 all are sons of Late Basudeo Pd. Sah and all are residents of Village- Bishunpura Bakhraur, P.O. Bishunpura Bazar, P.S. Sidhwalia, Distt. – Gopalganj ……. Defendants …. Opposite parties, 9. Shashank Devi, wife of Prem Kishore Prasad, D/o Late Basudeo Prasad Sah, R/o Village and P.O. – Chautarwa, Distt. West Champaran …. Defendant …. Opposite Party, 10. Tara Mati Devi, wife of Moti Lal Gupta, R/o Village Bakhraur, P.O. Bishunpura Bazar, P.S. Sidhwalia, Distt. – Gopalaganj …. Defendant ………………………………….. Opposite party, 11. Jainendra Kumar Sah @ Solan, 12. Binod Kumar Sah, 13. Sanjay Kumar Sah, 14. Bhola Shankar Sah, All 11 to 14 sons of Late Ram Akbal Prasad Sah, 15. Manju Kumari, D/o Late Ram Akbal Pd. Sah, All 11 to 15 are residents of Village - Bishunpura Bakhraur, P.O. Bishunpura Bazar, P.S. Sidhealia, Distt. – Gopalganj … Defendants – opposite parties, 16. Bhavasgari Devi, W/o Rajendra Prasad, D/o Late Chit Lal Sah, R/o Village – Pyarepur, P.O. Devapur, P.S. Barauli, Distt. – Gopalganj ….. Defendant …. Opposite Party, 17. Girja Devi, W/o Hira Lal Sah, D/o late Chit Lal Sah, R/o Village - Bakhraur, P.O. Bishunpura Bazar, P.S. Sidhwalia, Distt. – Gopalganj …………..… Defendant … Opp. Party, 18. Jhagru Raut, son of Jitu Raut, R/o Village Jalalpur Kala, P.O. Bishunpura Bazar, P.S. Sidhealia, Distt. Gopalganj …. Defendant ………………………………. Opp. Party and 19. Jumrati Mian, S/o Gulzar Mian, R/o Village Bishunpur, P.O. Bishunpura Bazar, P.S. Barauli, Distt. Gopalganj …. Defendant ………………………………………………. Opposite Party. ----------- For the Petitioner:- Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate. --------- 4. 15.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 This application is directed against the order dated 07.11.2006 passed by the Sub Judge II, Gopalganj whereby the additional written statement filed by the defendant no. 1 had been accepted by the concerned court subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1000/-. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the court below ought not to have allowed the petition at the belated stage. The court below after considering the rival submissions of the parties had accepted the additional written statement subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1000/- in the interest of justice. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. This Civil Revision is dismissed. dk ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J. )