IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1669 of 2010 Date of Decision : March 15, 2010. Inder Pal Singh Bagga .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.B.B.Bagga, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this Civil Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the disciplinary proceedings as well as the consequential orders dated 5.6.2008, 8.9.2008 and 13.10.2008 whereby the punishment of stoppage of three annual increments with cumulative effect has been imposed upon him and his review application has also been turned down. After arguing the case at some length and keeping in view the fact that seriously disputed questions of fact are involved in this case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach an appropriate forum. As regards the petitioner's grievance regarding implementation of the order of punishment in a manner to cause maximum C.W.P.No .1669 of 2010 2 harm to him, the petitioner shall be at liberty to represent the Competent Authority and if such a representation is made within a period of one month from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Competent Authority in accordance with the Rules/Instructions, within a period of two months thereafter. Dasti. March 15, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE