IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36657 of 2010 AYODHYA YADAV, SON OF LATE PRAYAG YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 353, 427, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioner kept absconding for about seven years even though he was named in the First Information Report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for commitment or for framing of charge and in case, it is done so, his bail shall not be considered. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)