1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1795 of 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 683 of 2008 Pandharinath S. Rangnekar .. Applicant versus Mr.V.K.Banatwala & Anr. .. Respondents ... Mr.Pradeep Havnur for the applicant. Ms.H.Y.Shah for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 12th November 2008 P.C.: 1. Heard counsel for the applicant and respondent no.1. None present for respondent no.2. 2. The dispute relates to a car parking space. According to the applicant, a suit car parking space was allotted to him while according to the respondent 2 no.1, that car parking space was allotted to him by the respondent no.2 is the builder and promoter of the scheme. On my repeated query to the counsel for the appellant to show any material on record that the suit car parking space was allotted to him and/or was given in his possession, the learned counsel was unable to point out any material showing that the suit car parking space was allotted to the applicant. The trial court has held against the applicant. In the circumstances, applicant is not entitled to any interim relief. Hence, the application is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J)