IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4261 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.392/2003 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), THRISSUR CC.579/2000 of JUDL. MAGISTRTE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ RAVINDRAN, S/O.AYYAPPU, KUNNAMKODE HOUSE, MAMMIYOOR DESAM, GURUVAYOOR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/STATE & COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- 1. JOSEPH, S/O.JACOB, PANACKAL HOUSE, MAMMIYOOR DESAM, GURUVAYOOR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKADU TALUK. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M. NAZAR SRI.RANJIT BABU SRI.V.V.JOY THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HARILAL, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = Unnumbered Crl.R.P.No......... of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18th day of July, 2013 O R D E R There was no representation for the Revision petitioner, despite the postings on 19/03/2013, 05/04/2013, 27/05/2013 and 18/06/2013. Though there was no representation on 27/05/2013, the Revision petitioner was given an opportunity to cure the defect within one week. But the defect has not been cured so far. Therefore, this court finds that the Revision petitioner is not interested to prosecute the revision petition. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. K.HARILAL, JUDGE. Stu //True copy// P.A to Judge.