IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1038 of 2010 LALITESHWAR CHOUDHARY @ LALIT CHOUDHARY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3 24.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The instant writ petition has been filed for a direction to respondents to restrain respondent no. 3 from filing cases one after another against him and his family. He further submits that on account of previous enmity in course of six months between November 2009 to May 2010, the respondent No.3 has filed as many as 6 to 7 cases. One case has even been filed by one of the henchmen of respondent No. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has filed counter affidavit stating that the last case, after investigation was found to be true against the accused persons except Amit Choudhary vide charge-sheet No. 35 of 2010 dated 30.4.2010. So far as the grievance of the petitioner that respondent No. 3 has filed one case after the other, he may approach the S.P. Darbhanga, by way of representations, who would look into it. It is observed that no one should be allowed to encroach upon the court’s time or time of authorities to wreak personal vengeance by filing one case after the other. The writ petition is disposed of Devendra/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)