1 AP504/08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.504 OF 2008 Edward Paul Machado ...Petitioner v/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...Respondents Mr Anoop Sharma with Mr G.K. Tripathi for Petitioner. Ms Minoo Siiodia with Mr Nikhil Agarwal and Mr Kaushik N. Singh i/b M/s Rustomji Ginwala for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 1ST APRIL 2011. 2 AP504/08 P.C. :- 1] The learned counsel appearing for petitioner, who was claimant before the learned Arbitrator, submits that the dispute that has been decided by the learned Arbitrator, did not fall within the arbitration clause. This contention is not available to be raised by the petitioner when the petitioner  claimant had invoked the arbitration clause. If the dispute did not fall within the arbitration clause, it is for the petitioner to explain why he invoked the arbitration clause. It is obvious that there is no substance in the petition. Petition is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH )