c^ \ S gfilE IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W-P.S.No. s~~}^\ /10 PETITIONER Lalji Sahu, S/o Shri Parasram Sahu aged about 52 years, Lab Tech. Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^^c ^^y^ k" .•'..tS'-' .<3 ". ^'. ^ y^}' ...••4^ VERSUS l.-^State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3. ' Shashtri Shikshan Samiti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT QF CHH^°I1SGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE 8HRI JUSTICE PRniMKBRDXWAKBR W.P.ISt N0. 5791/2010 Lalji Sahu Versus State ot'C.G. & Others WRIT PBTITIOS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDU Shri Neeraj Choubey, counsel for the petitioncr. Shri V.V.S.Moorfhy, Dy. A.G. for the State/resps. l & 2. ORDER {07.10.2010) Grievan.ee of the petitioner in the present petition is fhat he is the eiaployee of Govenunent Aided private educational institution aud though he is entifled for the benefit of 6th Pay Conunission as recomniended bv the Goverament for the govcnunent einployees but fhe same has aot been given to hirn. Accorditig to fhe petitioner earUer also when ttie benefit of 5th Pay Coniinission was refused to petitioner aad siimlariy placed persons, writ petitions were fUed before this Court and ultimately after passing of order by this Court the benefit of 5th Pay Coianussioa was granted to thein. 2. Counsel for fhe petitioner submits fhat ends of justice would be served if at this stage the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition aad direction be issued to fhe respondent N0.1 for decidiag fhe pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/5) dated 11.6.2010. 3. Counsel appearing for the State submits that fhe representation has been inade by the petitioner direcfly to thc Chief Minister whereas he is required to make suitable representation to respondent N0.1. He subinits that the case of the petitioner and similarly placed persons for grant of 6ih Pay Coinmission is akcady uxider consideration and let the petitioner inake a fresh icpresentation and fhe same woiild be decided in. accordance wifh law. 4. Accordingly, fhe petitioner is pennitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid Mberty. In fhe eventuatity of fiting a fresh representation by the petitioner before the respoadent N0.1 wifbin a period of one inonth froin fhe date of receipt of copy of fhis order, it is expected froin ftie said authorities to pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible preferably wifhia a period offour inonfhs frosi fhe date ofits receipt. 5. It is made clear ttiat fhis Coiu-t has not expresscd any opimon on merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at Uberty to decide the saine strictty ia accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge