IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 10619 of 2000 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ AMINABANU ISMAILBHAI MARU (MODEN) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JB DASTOOR for Petitioner MR MA QURAISHI for Petitioner No. 1 MS HANSABEN PUNANI, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1-2 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 2-3,5 MR EE SAIYED for Respondent No. 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 23/08/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms Hansaben Punani, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. E.E. Saiyed for respondent no.4. 2. Rule returnable today. Ms. Hansaben Punani, learned AGP waives service of rule for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. E.E. Saiyed waives service of rule for respondent no.4. 3. On a joint request the matter is taken up for final hearing today. 4. In order to avoid unnecessary controversy on issues which are not germane to the main relief sought by the petitioner, the Court has been able to persuade learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent no.4 to come to an agreement. 5. Consequently by consensus it is directed that the petitioner shall report for work at the premises of respondent no.4 on 30th August 2002 at 11 a.m., and on her so reporting, she shall be given the same work which was assigned to her upon the alleged termination of her services, and on the same terms and conditions. 6. In view of the aforesaid directions issued by consensus, no further orders are necessary in the present petition. Rule is accordingly made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no order as to costs. ******* *ar*