THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.794 of 2001 DATED: 29-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner, questioning the judgment, dated 09-02-2001, passed in C.C.No.347 of 1999 by the learned IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada, whereby the 1st respondent- accused was acquitted of the offences under Sections 138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for brevity, ‘the Act’). 2. Petitioner herein filed a complaint under Sections 138 to 142 of the Act, alleging that the cheques that have been issued by the 1st respondent herein-accused, in discharge of the debt due to the petitioner herein are bounced. The learned Magistrate numbered the said complaint as C.C.No.347 of 1999. However, as the complainant was called absent and not made any representation, he dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused. Aggrieved thereby, complainant-petitioner herein approached this Court and filed the present revision. 3. As the notices sent by the office were not served on the respondents, this Court directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to take out fresh notices and also to furnish the correct address of the 1st respondent herein- accused. Further, this Court by order, dated 06-11-2009, clearly observed that in the event of the petitioner failing to furnish the correct address of the 1st respondent on or before 04-12-2009, this revision stands dismissed. 4. Office has put a note that the learned counsel for the petitioner failed to furnish the correct address of the 1st respondent herein. In the light of the said office note, it is clear that this revision stands dismissed insofar as the 1st respondent is concerned. Now, this revision lies only against the 2nd respondent-State, which is a formal party and therefore, no orders need be passed in this revision. 5. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 29th July, 2010. Tsy