1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2838 OF 2009 Shriram S/o Dhondiba Chate Versus State of Maharashtra and others. *** Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate i/b Mr. S.J.Salunke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. In Crime No.155 of 2009, registered with Ambajogai Police Station, pre-arrest bail is sought for offence punishable under section 302, 143, 147, 148, 149 read with 34 of I.P.C. 2. The counsel for the accused/ applicant informs the accused/ applicant is 60 years old and a tuberculosis patient and the death of the victim is by self consumption of poisonous substance witnessed by several persons and on political rivalry several villagers, including the present applicant, are falsely implicated. He assets, even the police have registered offence against relations, including the widow vide Crime No.156 of 2009 for having taken 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. the dead body of deceased to the police station for pressurising police. 3. At this stage of the matter, without adverting and subtracting anything, the fact remains F.I.R. of the widow allegedly claimed to be eye witness, indicts the accused/ applicant with specific role, gave rise to C.R. No.156 of 2009. The postmortem notes display injuries sustained/ suffered by the deceased. In the situation, no pre-arrest bail. Application rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:28/08/2009. ans/2838