IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. R.S.A. No. 260 of 2006. Decided on: 13th September, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Krishan Kumar and others. …Defendants-Appellants. -Versus- Virender Kumar Jaiswal. …Plaintiff-Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the appellants. : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Ms. Shikha Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge: R.S.A. No. 260 of 2006 & C.M.P. No. 817 of 2010. Heard. Allowed. In sequel to order dated 21.07.2010, the parties have arrived at a compromise. The parties have jointly filed this application under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The compromise has been effected in terms of the conditions enumerated in paragraph No. 2 of the application. The same shall form integral part of the judgment. 2. Consequently, in view of the terms and conditions enumerated in Sub-paragraphs No. (a) to (c) of Paragraph No. 2 of the application, the judgment and decree shall stand modified to that extent only. The decree sheet be drawn accordingly. The parties are directed to obey the terms and conditions punctually. The appeal stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. September 13, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No.