IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 26307 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- THOMAS , AGED 52 YEARS, S/O OUSEPH, KOMBARAKKARAN HOUSE, NADAVARAMBA, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SMT.P.A. ANITHA RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, POOMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SHRI NOBLE MATHEW. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ. ................................................. W.P.(C ) No. 26307 OF 2008 ................................................... Dated this the 6th November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Kurian Joseph, J: The Writ Petition is filed for the following reliefs: “I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7 representation and pass appropriate orders within such time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. II. Call for records leading to Ext. P4 and issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing Ext. P4. III. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to endorse the change of ownership in the revenue records in accordance with Ext. P1 sale deed as requested by the petitioner, within such time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. IV. Issue such other orders, writs or directions as are deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court. V. Award cost of this proceeding to the petitioner. ” 2. It is seen that the request for mutation was turned down on W.P.(C ) No. 26307 OF 2008 2 the ground that relating to the said property one Writ Petition (W.P. (C)No. 34337 of 2005) and an Appeal ( R.F.A. 608 of 2006) were pending before this court. W.P.(C)No. 34337 of 2005 was disposed of as per Ext. P6 judgment. R.F.A.No. 608 of 2006 is pending. Now the prayer is to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7 representation subject to the result of the appeal. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take appropriate action on Ext. P7 in accordance with law, expeditiously. We make it clear that we have not considered the matter on merits either with regard to the claim made by the petitioner or with regard to the subject matter of the appeal. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk