fr H1GH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR WntP£tit3on(S>]vo.408§Gf2008 P1ETITIONER : Yamuna Prasad Upadhyay aged about 48 years, son of Shri Ramlakhan, Resident of I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). VERSUS RESPQNDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Admmistrator/Principal l.E.M. School, Jhagrakhmid, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada,Raipur(CG). (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrrUTtON OF INDIA) (SB: Hoii'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnihotri, J.) Present : Shn R.K, Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel LowyQr for the State. .QRAL.ORD.ER (Passed on 29 day ofJuly, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner claims to be an Assistant Teacher, working in I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), mn aod maiiaged by the respondent No. 3. The petitioner without giving details as to what is the riatiire of the School, why the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed this petition, praying that tiie respondents be directed to grant benefits of 5 Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is ditYicult to decide the issue involved for want of adequate materials with regard to grant of 5th Pay Commission to the employees. ^^i^s^s^^^swa ttg "4. This Court has already considered and decided the same issue on 06.02.2007 in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. No. 4108 of2005) aiid other connected matters. 5. It is not necessaiy to approach this Court directly when the law on a particular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a represeutation to the concemed autliorities, ifso advised, in the Ught of law settled by this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (Supra). 6. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sahu ,/"• ^ [ 2007 (1) BLJ 265