S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.398/2009. Mubeen vs State of Rajasthan) Date of Order :17.01.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr Rahul Tiwari, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S.Rathore, PP for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused Umardeen has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate bench and the case of the petitioner stands on better footing then the case of the co-accused. It is stated that otherwise the allegation for receipt of Rs.18 lac exists against Hakam. Thus, looking to this, petitioner may be granted bail Learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, has opposed this bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Mubeen on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.103/2008 registered at Police Station- Tapukada, Alwar for the offence under Section 420 IPC provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (M.N. BHANDARI),J.