In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 4176 of 2006 (O&M) Ran Singh ... Appellant vs Land Acquisition Collector, SYL Canal Project, Patiala and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. This order shall dispose of the aforesaid appeal filed by the landowner seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that land of the claimant situated within the revenue estate of Village Doomcheri, Tehsil and District Ropar, was acquired vide Notification dated 7.10.1985, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by the State of Punjab for construction of Sutlej Yamuna Link Canal. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the compensation @ of Rs. 72,500/- per acre for chahi, Rs. 50,000/- per acre for barani, Rs. 45,000/- per acre for banjar and Rs. 40,000/- per acre for gair mumkin kadim kind of land. The learned court below, on reference under Section 18 of the Act, enhanced the compensation to Rs. 1,05,000/- per acre for chahi, Rs. 80,000/- per acre for barani, Rs. 60,000/- per acre for banjar kadim and Rs. 47,000/- per acre for gair mumkin kind of land. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA. No. 3304 of 2006 – Malkiat Singh and others vs Land Acquisition Collector and another, decided on 11.1.2010, whereby the appeals filed by the landowners were dismissed, and award of the learned court below was upheld. Since this court has already upheld the award of the learned court below, the present appeal filed for enhancement of compensation does not survive. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 12.7.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge