IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1385 OF 1983 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.509 OF 1985 For Approval and Signature The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.K. KESHOTE --------------------------------------------------------- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether their lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950, or any order made thereunder ? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? --------------------------------------------------------- SHREYAS KELAVANI TRUST & ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: In SCA No.1385 of 1983: None present for the petitioners MR SR DIVETIA, APP, for Respondents In SCA No.509 of 1985 MS MAMTA VYAS for the petitioners MR SR DIVETIA, APP, for Respondents --------------------------------------------------------- Coram: S.K. Keshote,J Date of decision:10.7.97 C.A.V. JUDGMENT The first matter was called out for hearing in the first round, then in the second round and lastly in the third round, but neither any representative the petitioners or somebody else is present on their behalf. 2. In both these Special Civil Applications, challenge has been made by the petitioners to the Government Resolution No.GAC.1077-339197-G dated November 10, 1978, and as such, they are being disposed of by this common order. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners appearing in Special Civil Application No.509 of 1985 very fairly conceded that this Resolution has come up for consideration before this Court in another petition and this Court has held the same to be valid. Further, that in view of the said decision, nothing now can be said more in this petition and the same may be decided in the line of the previous decision of this court. The learned counsel for the respondents also does not dispute the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in Special Civil Application No.509 of 1985. 4. As the validity of the Resolution impugned in these petitions has already been examined by this Court and the same has been held to be valid, nothing now needs to be decided in these matters as these Special Civil result, these Special Civil Applications fail and the same are dismissed. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted by this Court, stands vacated. No order as to costs. ....... s