WP(C) 560/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI Heard Ms. S. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. VL Singh, l earned Government Advocate, Assam. As agreed to by the learned counsels for the parties and in view of the subject matter involved and furthermore as written instructions has been receive d by the learned Government Advocate, Assam, final orders in the writ petition i s being passed at the admission stage. The petitioners in the two writ petitions claim to be registered owner o f vehicles bearing registration No.NL-04/A-2583 (Tata 407 Truck) and AS-05/B-666 7 (Tata 709 Truck). According to the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.506 of 2010, his v ehicle was requisitioned by the District Administration of Karbi Anglong from 25 .10.1997 to 15.11.1997 and again from 1.1.2009 to 2.9.2009. Similarly, according to the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.480 of 2010, his vehicle was requisitioned for the period 27.7.2007 to 31.12.2009. As the bills submitted by the petitioners on account of requisition compensation amounting to Rs.3,62,260 (in W.P.(C) No.560 of 2010) and Rs.7,20,219/- (in W.P.(C) No.480 of 2010), had remained unpaid, th e present recourse to writ remedy has been invoked. The written instructions received by the learned Government Advocate, As sam, as placed before the Court, does not raise any dispute with regard to the o wnership of the vehicles, as claimed by the petitioners or the requisition of th e same for the period mentioned in the writ petition, details of which has been noticed above. The said instructions, which have been received by the learned Go vernment Advocate from the Superintendent of Police, Karbi Anglong District are to the effect that vehicle number NL-04/A-2583 (Tata 407 Truck) was used by the personnel of 12 JAK Army Regiment, Camp-Bokajan and 16 Bn. B.S.F. Camp-Chokiholl a during the period of requisition. The said instructions are also to the effect that vehicle number AS-05-B/6667 was used by the personnel of 16 Bn. BSF, Camp- Chakiholla during the period of its requisition. The Superintendent of Police, i n the written instructions, has stated that requisition compensation as would be due is to be paid by the requisitioning authority. In the said instructions, it has been further mentioned that the requisitioning authority is the District Ad ministration of the Karbi Anglong District. In view of the above instructions received by the learned Government Adv ocate, Assam, which has been placed before the Court, the only conceivable order that both the writ petitions would call for is to direct the Deputy Commissione r, Karbi Anglong District to work out the details of the requisition compensatio n that would be payable to the petitioners for the requisition of their vehicles keeping in mind the period for which the vehicles remain under such requisition . The Deputy Commissioner, Karbi Anglong District will complete the aforesaid ex ercise including payment of requisition compensation, as may be found due, withi n a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Consequently, both the writ petitions shall stand disposed of in the above terms. The written instructions placed before the Court by Ms. VL Singh, learne d Government Advocate, Assam shall remain on record.