* 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 631 OF 2009 Central Bureau of Investigation Anti Corruption Branch, Mumbai .......Applicant V/S. Sarabjot Singh and Ors. .........Respondents * * * * * * Mr. Ejaz Khan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.L. Maneshinde i/by. Ms. Snehal V. Khairnar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, APP for State- respondent no.2. Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 14 January, 2011. P.C. : 1. Both the counsel state that nothing survives in the Criminal Revision Application in view of the chargesheet being filed about a year back. The learned counsel for the applicant, however, has some reservations about an opinion expressed in the impugned order * 2 * towards its end. The same reads as follows : So in view of the detailed reasons, I find that further detention “ of the accused in judicial custody will amount to pre-punishment to them and it is likely that these accused; if continued to be kept under detention then they will likely to come in contact with hard core criminals in jail and will learn act of committing offences of more severe in nature.” 2. The apprehension felt by the applicant, as well as, his counsel is that the opinion expressed in the order may be used in future by accused persons while applying for bail. He requests for expunging the remarks from the order. There is no need to expunge the opinion expressed therein. It would be sufficient to record that the opinion expressed therein shall be treated as relevant only to the case. Criminal Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn. [Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J]