IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13615 of 2011 Nawal Kishore Kunwar son of late Balram Kunwar, resident of Village/Mohalla Musapur Dih, P.S. Samastipur, District Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chairman, District Board, Samastipur. 3. The Secretary, District Board, Samastipur. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 19.8.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction regarding designation of respondent no.4 in course of the day. Heard Shri Arun Kumar Bhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Tej Pratap Singh, learned A.C. to S.C.17, who appears on behalf of lrespondent no.1 and Shri Prabhat Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.6.2009 as Steno Typist from Zila Parishad, Samastipur, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay all his retiral dues. In paragraph-5 of the writ petition, it has been stated that despite filing representation, the authority concerned has not paid any amount of post 2 retiral dues. The claim of dues has been mentioned in paragraph-6 of the writ petition, which are as follow :- (i) Gratuity 3,20,265/- (ii) Leave Encashment 1,94,100/- (iii)Salary due from 41 months 4,88,667/- (iv) Benefits of ACP Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already filed representation before respondent no.4 and as such writ petition may be disposed of directing him to make payment or to take decision on representation. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed representation before respondent no.4 within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.4 3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)