-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Chamber Summons No. 1156 of 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1861 OF 2008 Gopichand P. Godhwani. ..Plaintiff. Versus Shyam Godhwani & Anr. ..Defendants. Mr. A. J. Panicker for the plaintiff. Mr. Milind Jadhav i/b Madusudan Nair for defendant nos. 1 & 2. Ms. Khyati Ghevaria i/b M/s. Dhru & Co., for the defendant no.3. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : February 8, 2010. P. C. : 1. At the outset the learned counsel for the plaintiff makes a statement that he is restricting this chamber summons to the extent of amendments sought in clauses (c) & (d) of the Schedule. Regarding rest of the amendments he seeks liberty to file fresh chamber summons. Liberty is granted accordingly. 2. By the proposed amendment in terms of clauses (c) & (d) of the Schedule, the plaintiff is seeking to bring on record legal heirs of the deceased defendant no.2. This amendment is not seriously opposed by the learned counsel for defendants. Chamber summons is accordingly allowed to the extent of amendments sought in terms of clauses (c) & (d) of the Schedule. So far as rest of the proposed amendments are concerned, the -: 2 :- plaintiffs are at liberty to take out fresh chamber summons. All contentions in this regard are kept open. Chamber summons stands disposed of. (R.V. MORE, J.)