M.C.C. No.1660/2011 30.11.2011 Shri Amit Nagpal, learned counsel for the applicant. This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of W. A. No.8/2011. In the writ appeal on 8.2.2011 in the presence of the learned counsel for the appellant an order was passed that the default should be made good within two weeks failing which this appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court, yet the default was not made good. Now this application for restoration of the writ appeal has been filed with vague averments. If the restoration is ordered by the Court, merely making of an application, the peremptory order would cease to have meaning and respect from the litigant. Normally it is for the litigant to make good the default without waiting for an order of the Court, immediately after default is pointed out by the office. If the litigant does not make good the default after office report and thereafter fails to do so even after a peremptory order of the Court, the case should not be restored lightly. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application for restoration is allowed and the writ appeal No.8/2011 is restored to its file subject to following two conditions:- (i) That the applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- as costs with the High Court Legal Services Committee without one week and shall furnish a receipt thereof. (ii) The default pointed out by the office shall be complied with within a period of two weeks. (Sushil Harkauli) (Alok Aradhe) Acting Chief Justice Judge AK