IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2009 / 31ST BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 26523 of 2009(O) -------------------------- AS.359/2009 of DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR OS.695/2007 of I ADDL.M.C.,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M/S.PREMIER WIRE PRODUCTS DOOR NO. 43/536, SEMETHERI JUNCTION CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE KANAYANNUR TALUK, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS. 2. ANTONY GALDEN PAIVA, S/O.LATE ANDREW SUNNY PAIVA, AGED 41, PANDARAPPARAMBIL HOUSE,ERNAKULAM NORTH P.O., ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK. 3. TONY PAIVA, S/O.LATE ANDREW SUNNY PAIVA, AGED 46, PANDARAPPARAMBIL HOUSE,ERNAKULAM NORTH P.O., ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.C.CHARLES SRI.M.POLY MATHAI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (SIDCO) T.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C).No.26523 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September 2009 ------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed seeking the following relief. Direct the Additional District Judge, Thrissur to dispose of Ext.P3 immediately and at any rate within a week. 2. Petitioner was the plaintiff in O.S No.695 of 2007 on the file of the Munsiff Court, Thrissur. Suit was one for a declaration of right of way and for injunction, and the respondent was the defendant. Suit was dismissed. Against the decree and judgment dismissing the suit petitioner preferred an appeal and that appeal numbered as A.S No.359/09 is pending on the file of the Additional District Court, Thrissur. In that appeal the W.P.(C).No.26523 OF 2009 Page numbers petitioner has moved an application for interim injunction against the respondent which is yet to be disposed of. Petitioner seeks directions / orders to the court below for expeditious disposal of that interlocutory application, a copy of which is produced as Ext.P3 in the writ petition. 3. The respondent has entered appearance. I heard the counsel on both sides. I direct the learned District Judge to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 application as expeditiously as possible at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv