IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 24TH DECEMBER 2009 / 3RD POUSHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 634 of 2009() ----------------------------- CRA. NO. 355 OF 2004 OF ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (FAST TRACK COURT – III), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM C.C. NO. 546 OF 2002 OF J.F.C.M ., VARKALA REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/ACCUSED: --------------------------------------- KHADER PILLAI, ABDUL SALAM, K.R.MANZIL, THOKKADU, PANAYARA, CHEMMARUTHY VILLAGE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT-COMPLAINANT STATE: -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON 24/02/2009 PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl. R.P. No.634 of 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated, this the 24th day of February, 2009 ORDER In this Revision filed under Section 397 read with Sec. 401 Cr.P.C. the petitioner challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed by the courts below for an offence punishable under Sections 447 & 427 IPC 2. I heard the learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Even though the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner assailed on various grounds the judgments of the Courts below, I see little scope for interference. The findings recorded by the courts below are on the basis of appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence. Both the courts below have believed the prosecution witnesses. Sitting in the rarefied revisional jurisdiction, this Court will be loathe to interfere with the concurrent findings. I do not find any error, illegality or impropriety in the findings recorded by the courts below. This Revision which is devoid of any merit is accordingly dismissed confirming the conviction entered and the sentence passed against the revision petitioner. Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009 V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj