^(Y0fl\ :"'(• ·i5.fi r5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUKE :CHH&TTISGARH: BIIASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. : ._ytK OF 2006 PETITIONER Ishwari Prasad Kashyap aged 39 yrs. s/o Shri Chhabi Ram Kashyap r/o Gram : Masani Tah : Lormi Di&tt: Bilaspur CG VERSUS - RESPONDENTS ./• ,.^ \'k--<y..^ ..^/ ^^ l'^''^.--"' »<6': ^" ^i 4"". ^' &' 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through : The secretary to the Govt. of CG Department of Panchayat D.K.S. Bhavan : Mantralay Raipur CG /'' (-' The Joint Director Panchayat s Social Welfare Distt-Bilaspur CG The Chief Executive Officer Tah - Lormi Distt- Bilaspur CG Sub Divisional Officer(Revenue) Tah-Lormi Distt-Bilaspur CG .5. Gram Panchayat : Masana 'Through : The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat- Masana Tah-Lormi Distt - Bilaspur CG Shri Parsadi Das Jangade s/o Shri Sakha Ram Jangade Sarpanch :Gram Panchayat- Masana,Tah-Lormi Dlstt - Bilaspur CG ~^'v::^f!'Tr-.r: HRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF JU&ICATURE CHHATnSSARH: BIUS'UR Smgle Bench: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. W.P.No. 3085 of 2006 Petittoner Iswxri Prasad Kashyap Versus Reqiondents State of Chhatt-isgarh & others Shri Anurag Shrivostdva, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy, 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1. 2 and 4. Shri Sandeep Dubey, counsel for the respondent No. 3. Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel for the respondents No. 5 and 6. ORAL OR&Bl (4th Septamber. 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits on instructions that the relief sought for in this petition has been gnmted by •the respondents. Thus, nothing survives in this inatter, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents do not opposed the submission made by learned counsel oppearing the petitioner. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as hwing become infructuous. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge