THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3802 of 2009 Dated:21.08.2009 Between: Varada Kota Satyanarayana. …Petitioner and Smt.Varada Parvathi, And another. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3802 of 2009 ORDER: Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are mother and son. They filed a suit, being O.S.No.170 of 2006, for maintenance against the petitioner, who is the husband of the first respondent and father of the second respondent. They also filed I.A.No.1857 of 2008 for interim maintenance of Rs.3,000/- to first respondent and Rs.2,000/- to second respondent. The Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Narsapur, allowed the application of the respondents as prayed for. Against the said order dated 23.03.2009, the petitioner/defendant filed the instant Civil Revision Petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the learned Senior Civil Judge suffers from error and that though there being no material to show that the petitioner owns agricultural land, the learned Judge proceeded in a wrong manner. Secondly, an extent of Ac.1.13 cents was settled in favour of first petitioner and an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- was paid to her. This Court has perused the order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge. It appears, the petitioner did not adduce any evidence to substantiate his claim that he settled immovable property and also gave cash to first respondent for maintenance. In his counter affidavit he did not specifically deny the allegation that he was doing money lending business. There was no proper denial. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any infirmity in the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 21.08.2009 vs