In the High Court of Travancore-Gochin Before Their Lordships The Hon'ble Sh±i. K.>.Govinda Pillai, Judge & The Hon'ble Shri. Joseph Vithayathil, Judge • A.S.31 of 19b0 O.S.241 of 1123, Prl.Munsiff's Court, Shertallai. Appellant - plaintiff:- '\ Narayanan Sankara Panickar residing at Kannethu Veettil alias \ L I ! Shertallai. /j .Kaliathu, Perumbalam Muri, Vatuthala Mattathilbhagom Pakuthy, By Advocate Shri. K.N.Narayanan Nair Respondents - defendants 2 to 13:- 1. Narayanan Vasudevan Pillai residing at Kakkara Veetil alias T.hattaril, Kodamthuruthu Muri, Thuravoor North Pakuthy, S.hertallai. 2. Narayanan Sankara Pillai of Do. 3. Kutty Amma. Bhargavi Amma of Do. f thudi Veetil, Aroor Muri and Pakuthy, Do.Ialuk. 7. Govindan Neelakanta Pillai of Do. 8. Kavamma .Ka.rthyayani .Am.ma. of Do. 9. Govindan Prabhakaran Nair of Do. 10. Kavama Lekshmi Amma of Do. • & 11. Goviridan Paraineswaran Nair of Do. minor. ¢ • 4. Bhargavi Apa 'I'hankamma of Do. • Bharavi Amma Sarojini Amma of Do. 6. Govindan lesava Pillai residing at Kalappurakkal alias C.heru- 12. Leksnmi Amma. Savithri Amma of'Do. minor. Guardian of minor respondents 11 and 12 is their mother t.he • 10th respondent. 1st respondent by Advocate Shri P.Narayana Pillai This appeal suit having been .heard on 1-7-198, the court on the same day delivered the following:- Judgment The plaintiff is the appellant. His pr~yer is only for a remand. ;-·~ I .f•, y 2. for his evidence. He .had to produce copy of the decree in O.S. 703 o£ 1113 of the Shertallai .Munsiff' s Court. He got a copy only after 1 / the suit was decreed on 30-11-1124 though he had applied for the same on 14-2-1124. We got thit information from the copy obtained by the party and shown to us at the time of argument. lie was how- V 'I costs or this, court will Q terms. If he pays Rs.40 to the other side towards the court on or before 10-7-1903, the decree of the lower ever negligent to .some ·e_xtent and so we can allow a remand only on r· · · · stand reversed and the case sent back for fresh trial and disposal. i. r t In that event there will be no further order as to the costs of this court. The institution fees will in the event of remand be · refunded to the appellant. If the costs ordered are not paid the appeal will stand dismissed with costs. Sad.K.S.Govinda Pillai, Sd. Joseph Vithayathil, Judge Judge • (True copy) · 1st July 1953 1st respondent's advocate Shri P.Narayana Pillai nxiris±sft states that he received on 7-7-1953 Rs.40 as costs of the appeal t L. from Shri K.N.Narayanan Nair, the advocate for the appellant. 1? Sd. Registrar , I. Compared by:-. I t.. A.S.31 of 19b0 Judgment.