5/9 \W/\ gmgw amt! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wpfeéTNo. ((4 /Z /2o1o PETITIONER: Manmohan Patel S/o Shri Nand Ram Patel, aged about 43 years, Occupation Service posting as Peon at Government High School, Bhupdeopur, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) R/o Fuljharia Para Ward No.2, Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C. G.) VERSUS / RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. “’iThe Block Education Officer, Block Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) / 4. Digamber Prasad Patel S/o Kanti Kumar, Aged about 37 years, Occupation Service posting as Assistant Grade III, Block Education Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Purshottarn Lal Darshan S/o Peelu Ram Aged about 37 years, 3 ‘1‘” 4n @é wy..§?:..(2u.)..§?£g:...§.uz b: 200 mm (Wu) WWW ammm WWW?! WWW f§€Im %a1’%mwé¥1 $3 : HON’gLE MR. JUS’HCE PR 99. 1 12$ 13 Shn' Manoj Jaiswalj couns Shri Vivek Shaxma, PL. f0: Grievancg of the petitions: though ha is entitled for his pron the post of Waterman (Peon) but to hixn. it has been furthor conte juniors Le. respondrmts 4 to v ignoring the case ofthe petitiooe .‘ State counsel submits t} representation before the resp. decided in accordance with. law é of fhe case. According1y, the petition is the petitioner to make a repres within a period of one momh frc this order and m tum‘ it is e) decide. the same Within a furthex date of its receipt. 1t is made clear that this opinion on merits of the case would be at Eberty to decide t with iaw. ‘ TKNKER DEWAKER :1 for the petitioner. :the State. m the present petiiion is that rotion. to the post ofAG-IH from the same has not been granted :rided bv the petitioner that the 3 have been given promotion lat 1et the petitioner make a N02 and the same would be :fier considering ail the aspects L disposed of with a direction to entatiofa before the resp. No.2 m the date of receipt of copy of 'pected from the resp. No.2 to period of four months from the Couit has not expressed any ami the authorii’y concemed 1e same strictiy in accordance Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker i Judge J,