1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3722 OF 2009 WITH REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO. 16246 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 361 OF 1997 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing Review Application and also for review. Both applications are taken up for hearing with consent of the parties. 2. Heard Adv. Shri A.S. Shelke for the applicant and Adv. Shri D.R. Shelke for the respondent. This Court mainly relied upon Exh. “D” which is produced along with Writ Petition itself, which 2 states that in the year 1986-87 the Government has not sanctioned any budgetary provision and therefore all work in the division was closed and as such it was not possible to pay salaries/wages to the workers. The Government has given sanction to the continuation of the division up to 31st December, 1986 only and thereafter this division was to be closed and under the circumstances notice of retrenchment was given under Section 25 (f) of the Industrial Disputes Act. It is not stated in the application that the contents of this notice dated 27.11.1986 were false to the knowledge of the Executive Engineer, who signed the letter and issued order of retrenchment. Merely because some other workers are now working in some other sub-division, would not by itself 3 mean that the statement made in the termination letter Exh. “D” were false. This Court has considered all aspects in the judgment. In my opinion, this is not fit case where review can be allowed. In these circumstances, this application for condonation of delay, so also review is dismissed. No costs. Date: 06.07.2009 [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/JUL09/ca3722.09