® ?)aO]/? IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W.P.(S) No. mém /2009-. ’I/ MANOJ KUMAR HARKANDE S/O Shri. Sudhakar Narayan Aged about 34 Years, Unemployed Resident of : Near UCo Bank, Ramnagar, BMY-CHARODA District : Durg (CG) VERSUS / (I, RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER‘ARTICLE 226 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. Union of India, Through : The General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Zone, G.M. Office, PO : BILASPUR — 495001(CG) 2. /V The Dy. Chief Personnel Officer, Head Quarters’ Office, Personnel Department, South East Central Railway, BILASPUR ~495001 (CG) 3. /The Divisional Railway Manager, (Personnel) S.E.C.Railway, Raipur Division, RAIPUR — 492001(CG) W V/ _ p Q§:o’b _'J S' Uon India ad others ni of n .e it ‘ Ms. aushin l onse or ponns Qim .12-s) ggr P;a&nt Kmr Mi§hmug a In‘ this w igrg rwc‘a the entire recruitmen tO ly d 108 (AnnexurexP‘imi by sh§equent notification dated -20 -).V The petitioneryha ,ampraygq igtsetting aside the order passed by the. QgntraiAdminimatiygImmiggbaipqr , (henceforth: ‘thg Tribunar) _. on 6-52009 (Annexure, , P-6), in o.A. rit petition the petitnernhasmygd ‘foncenatign of t pQess camedoutmbywempgment notification ated 1-8-20 -m u 1-109 (Annexure. P2 s binds/2009 and the letter dated 2-2-2009 (Annemretz-s) issued by the respondents and __to_,_dite9i the__[e$pondents to conduct fresh selection/written test after making necessafyggewgreiaxation in the advertisement dated 11~8-ZOp8 (Annexure P-1). 2. Before the Tribunal the petitioner had ciaimed the simiiar relief and had challenged the Validity [of the notiftcationdated 11-8-2008 T(Annexure_ P~1 ) videwhitchlappliceationse were?,ihvitedwttomteligihtevand HIGH couRT OF cHHATTIseARH AT auspya _‘ . _ ‘io 2 tam. , _ $hrLB.P..Rao:Qo,,unswJformeh petigner, Na Ai, cul fthe resdet; A: ( 1L2oo W5 meritorious Scout and Guides candidates for iiiling up 2 graoanoies in Group-C category in pay-scale Rs.3050—4900_and 6 vacancies in Group—D category in pay-scale Rs2550-3540a9amst,.3§0ut rand Guides quota over. SEC Railway. The ba§i9,contentign&ra§edgpy;he' petitioner before the Tribunaiwa‘s thatthough herisweligibigyfroriaroups- ‘ c and D categories posts as «he fuitills the prescribededucationai qualification yet since‘he is over-aged his application has not been considered for the posts. The Tribunal hastmeentionertjnnaragraph 2 of the order dated 65-2009 (Annexure~P-6),,that “it is admitted that he is not within the age limit prescribed vide aforesaid notification”. 3. The Tribunal dismissed the original applicationbyorder dateds- H 5-2009 (Annexure P—6) and has granted liberty to the respondents to carry out the selection process in terms of rules and law. 4. ln the return tiled before this Court; the respondents have stated that the recruitment process for filling of theppsts in, GroukQ category against Scout and Guides quota for the year 2008-09 for Raipur Division is complete and the competent authorityhae gtantedapproval for provisional empanelment of Mr. Digamberlal and Mr.g/A‘.MNageshwar / Rao. 5. The petitioner has not amendedgthe, wrlt tion,.!9...§Ha.Y.,the above named two persons in the writ petition,tthei:efqr,e,vin View of the completion of the selection process, the instant wnt petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Gopol I s, Sd/— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Judge