é; x1 @3 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Single Bench : Hon’ble ShriSR. Nayak.C.J. Writ Petition No.3831 of 2003 N.Pal, S/o Late G.N. Pal Aged about 66 years. R/o Old R,T.O. Road, Ku‘dudand Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITIONERS 1. 2. R.C. Franklin. Sfo Late A.S. Franklin, aged about 65 years, Rio Chandni Chowk, Kududand, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Manoranjan Elkana, S/o Late M L Elkana, aged about 37 years, Rio Majhwapara, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Tah. & District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Wiliam Ram Slo Shri P.R. Ram, aged about 65 years, R/o Kududand, Biiaspur 'Tahsil & Dist. Bilaspur (CG) Herold Walter. S/o Late B.L. Warter, aged about 63 years, Rlo Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur Tah. & Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) Philip James, S/o Late W. James, aged about 64 yrs., Rlo Civil Court Road, Kududand, Bilaepur, Tah. & District Bilaspur (CG) versus Church of Christ Mission ln lndla, Kududand, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Clo Shri lshwari Lal, aged About 70 years, S/o Late Pyarelal, Secretary, Church of Christ Mission In India, R/o Kududand, Bilaspur Tah. & Dist. Bilaspur (CG) RESPGNDENT Mr. Manindra Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Amrito Das, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondent. resent : ORAL ORDER (Passed on 17m. February, 2006) This writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution arises out of an application filed by the respondent - plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. P @D The trial Court rejecied the applicai‘ion. When that was chalenged before l the appeliate Judge, the same was allowed and temporary injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff. The matter was carried to this Court by way of Civil Revision No.494 of 2001 and this Court. having entertained the civil revision, by its order dated 10-10-2001. made an interim arrangement allowing both the warring groups to pray for the Lord in the subject Church and that order has been in operation tili date. The suit is of the year 1998. it must be in a very advanced stage. The order made by this Court on 10-1 0-2001 has been in operation till date. i think that the ends of justice would be met by directing the same order to continue till the disposal of the suit and directing the iearned trial Judge to hear and dispose of the main suit within a time-frame. in that View of the matter, i dispose of the writ petition and direct that the interim order made on 10- 10-2001 in Civil Revision No.494/200’i shaii be in operation tiii the disposal of the suit. The learned trial Judge is directed to expedite the trial of the suit and dispose of the same as early as possible at any rate within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the learned trial Judge forthwith. It is directed that the iearned trial Judge shall not be influenced by any of the order made by the learned appellate Judge or by this Court and the suit should be decided on the basis of evidence that may be adduced by the arties. No costs. p Sdl- Chief Justice