IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 27069 of 2008(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SETHUKUMAR, S/O. MACHIMUTHU, CHEMBRAVALAPPIL, MUTHALIYAR STREET, SHORNUR. BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SHORNUR POLICE STATION, SHORNUR. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 3. SHORNUR MUNICIPALITY, REP.BY ITS SECRRETARY,MUNICIPAL OFFICE, SHORNUR. 4. SUBRAMONIAN, S/O. MANICKAN MUTHALIYAR, CHEMBRA VALAPPIL, MUTHALIAR STREET, SHORNUR. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 & R2 ADV. SRI. MANSOOR B.H.FOR R3 SMT. C.SEENA FOR R3 SRI.R.SREEHARI FOR R4 SRI.R.VENUGOPAL FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.27069/2008 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PERMISSION GIVEN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER AS PER THE BUILDING RULES. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 22/08/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE Kss K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.27069 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 27th November, 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner has approached this court alleging that the 1st respondent, the Sub Inspector of Police is harassing him at the instance of the 4th respondent. The petitioner owns 5.5 cents of land in Survey No.231/1 of Shornur Village. He is constructing a residential building there in accordance with Ext.P1 building permit granted by the Shornur Municipality. The 4th respondent is a neighbouring property owner. He apprehends that if the petitioner demolishes the northern compound wall of his property, that may affect the 4th respondent. He attempted a civil suit before the Munsiff Court, but it was dismissed. Later, he moved the 1st respondent and now the 1st respondent is interfering with the petitioner's construction and threatening him. Hence this Writ Petition. 2. Learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that the 1st respondent received a petition from the 4th respondent. Both parties were summoned to the Police Station. On realising that it is a civil dispute, parties are advised to approach the civil court. WPC.No. 27069/08 2 Learned Government Pleader further submitted that the Police have no intention whatsoever to harass the petitioner. This submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE srd M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE WPC.No. 27069/08 3