IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.47 OF 2005 Aaron Abraham Varsulkar ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Rajiv Patil i/b Mr.Milind Sawant for Applicant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 11, 2005. JANUARY 11, 2005. JANUARY 11, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Application for bail is misconceived. It is conceded that Applicant has already been convicted by the Sessions Court and against that decision, matter was carried in appeal before this Court, which view has been affirmed. In other words, no proceedings are pending either before the Sessions Court or this Court. If it is so, it is not open for this Court to entertain the Bail Application as filed. It will be open to the Applicant to take recourse to remedy, as may be : 2 : permissible by law. 2. If such Application is filed, the appropriate Authority may consider the same expeditiously, in view of the reason stated that the Applicant’s daughter is getting married on 26th January 2005. The said Application be disposed of in accordance with the rules. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.