IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 19771 of 2010 Date of decision : 13.10.2011 Darshna Devi and another ...Petitioners versus Divisional Canal Officer and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. P.K. Ganga, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D. Khanna, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that this writ petition becomes infructuous, which may be dismissed as such. Learned counsel for respondents did not raise any objection, in this relevant connection. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for. October 13, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge