IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19420 of 2005 Between: Devireddy Venkata Reddy, s/o Devireddy Erikala Reddy (late). r/o Q.No.C-52, Madaram Township (PO), Adilabad District-504 220. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Galeru-Nagari Srujala Sravanthi-Telugu Ganga Project, Muddanur, Kadapa District-516 380. 2 Talari Obulu S/o Yamavaram poswt, Muddanur Mandal, Kadapa Dist. 3 Talari Subbamma W/o. Munaiah late Yamavaram poswt, Muddanur Mandal, Kadapa Dist. 4 Nallagari Nagalakshmi W/o. Venkatm Reddy Yamavaram poswt, Muddanur Mandal, Kadapa Dist. 5 Chappidi Venkata Konda reddy S/o. Lakshmi Reddy Yamavaram poswt, Muddanur Mandal, Kadapa Dist. RR 2to5 impleaded as per court order dt. 6-9-2005 in WPMP 24970 of 2005 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner :MR. KRISHNAN RAJESH FOR MR.D.RAJAN The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to stop the payment of compensation amount on the ayacut of 2.30 acres of S.No.504/2 Chinthakunta Village, Muddanuru Mandal, Kadapa District and 0.97 acres of S.No.506 Chinthakunta Village either to Mr. Talari Obulu, Nallagari Nagalakshmi, T.Subbamma; or Venkata Konda Reddy and consequently direct the Respondent to pay the compensation amount for S.No.504/2 and 506 Chintakunta Village to the petitioner after the enquiry of the real pattadar from Revenue Records and issue directions to the Respondent to get correct information pertaining to the real beneficiary on the ayacut detailed above from Mandal Revenue Officer, Muddanur and Revenue Divisional Officer, Jammalamadugu.” Sri Krishnan Rajesh, learned counsel representing Sri D.Rajan, learned counsel for the petitioner sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.24693 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NARAGJUNA REDDY, J 27th June, 2008. kvni