(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 670 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 670 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 670 OF 2005 Prabhakar Vasudeo Mukadam & 2 Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Laxman Syamsundar Patil & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Ms. Gauri Godse, counsel for Petitioners Mr. V.Z. Kankaria counsel for Respondents 1 to 11. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 22ND MARCH, 2005 DATED: 22ND MARCH, 2005 DATED: 22ND MARCH, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard Ms. Godse, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Kankaria, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 11. Perused the affidavit in reply filed by him. 2. This petition can be disposed of by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Kokan Region to hear and decide the Revision Application No. TNC 112/B/2005 within a fixed period. 3. It is accordingly directed that the said Revision be heard and decided as per law and after hearing the parties concerned within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of writ from this Court. Needless to (-2-) mention, the proceedings in the appeal will not proceed further unless the revision is decided. 4. Writ to go forthwith to the authorities below i.e. the Revisional Authority as well as the Appellate Authority. 5. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above directions.