IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2011 / 12TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 30909 of 2008(D) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): 1 ---------------------- SUDHARMA, AGED 45 YEARS, W/O. THAMARAKSHA PANICKER, LEKSHMI SADANAM, NEAR KUKKU THODU SCHOOL, CHAVARAKA VILLAGE,KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OOF POLICE,TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CBCID), MUTTADA, TRIVANDRUM. 5. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,REPRESENTED BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CBI, SPE, ERNAKULAM. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.B.VINOD R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY,SC, C.B.I. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 30909/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DATED 19/05/2008. P2: COPY OF THE POSTMORTEM REPORT DATED 19/05/2008. P3: COPY OF THE PREPAID CALL HISTORY. P4: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE ACTION COUNCIL DATED 28/05/2008. P5: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED NIL. P6: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27/06/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 30909 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2011. JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the CBI and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the 5th respondent to conduct investigation in respect of Crime No. 313 of 2008 of Chavara Police Station. The learned Public Prosecutor states that the investigation is completed and the police has decided to file the charge sheet against the accused after taking orders from the ADGP (Crimes). Therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this case. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv