.t^^.^r^ INTHE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVETR ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. Applicant : VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ RESPQNDENTS J.NAL AT RAIPUR >of1998 Deoprakash Gandle Aged about 33 years Son of Shri Kishandas Gandle Resident of Village & Post Deori (Sangwa) Thana, Block & Tah. Mungeli Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) (Ex-Mansevi Sahayak Shikchhak, previously appointed on due selection and eligibilities against the vacant post of Asstt. Teachers, under the Edn. Deptt. of Govt. of M.P.) (1) StateofM.P. . Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) (2) Commissioner of Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., Directorate of Public Instructions, (DPI Offiee), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal (M.P.) (3) Deputy Director of Public Instructions Govt. of.M.R, Education Deptt. Educat.ion Distt. Bilaspur, P.0. Bilaspur (M.P.) (4) Block Education Officer Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. . RCLMungelLTah._Myngeli, Distt. Bilaspur (M.P.) /\EElicatLon under section 19 oftheAdministrativeTriburialAct 1985 (No.13 of 1985') read with Articles 14_16. 21 .& 311 of the Constitution of India. considered with Principles of Natural and Social Justice. HIGH COURT OP CaHHATHSGARH ATBIUUWUR Wrtt Petttion (S.llfo. 2SS4 of 2008 Petitioner Deoprakash Gendte Versus Respondents State of Madhya Pradesh ThTough- Sccretaiy School Education Departinent andofheis 8B: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. AgnMiotari, J Shri Alok Nigaca, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Sint. Anju Ahuja, Advocate for fhe respondents. ORDBR ( 24A August, 2006) The foUowing order of the Coiirt is passed by 8atid» K. Agaihotrl, J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitroner subinits fhat fhe Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jablapur by order dated 2.3.1998 passed in O.A. No. 888/1997, has granted reUcf to thc similarty situated appBcants. In view of that order, fhe petitfoner wants to make a representation to fhe State/authorities for considering his case, to which leanied coiinsel appearing for fhe State/respondents has no objection. 2. Acconlingty, fhe petition is disnnissed as withdrawn, wifh Uberty to naake a representation if so advised, No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Thakur