THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO A.S.NO.1058 OF 2002 Dated. 01-12-2010 Between: The Special Tahsildar, La Unit-IV, Jangareddigudem …Appellant Vs. Billa Rama Rao and others ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO A.S.NO.1058 OF 2002 JUDGMENT (Per NRLN,J) This appeal is filed against the order in O.P.No.107 of 1990 questioning the enhancement of compensation for an extent of Ac.0.40 cents to Rs.8,000/- per acre as against the amount of Rs.4,500/- granted by the Land Acquisition Officer. An extent of Ac.10.28 cents of land situated at Vegavaram village of Jangareddigudem Mandal was acquired for formation of Vengalaraya Sagar Project. A draft notification was given on 10-04-1986 in respect of Ac.0.40 cents of land in Sy.No.297/3- B belonging to the claimant. After conducting an award enquiry, the Land Acquisition Officer fixed the market value at Rs.4,500/- per acre for dry land and Rs.6,000/- per acre for wet land. As the original owner Billa Gangamma died, the claimants were added as legal representatives, after reference to the court. On behalf of the claimants, PWS.1 to 4 were examined and Exs.A-1 to A-14 were marked. On behalf of the Land Acquisition Officer, RW.1 was examined and marked Ex.B-1. The lower court after considering the evidence on record and the legal position, enhanced the compensation to Rs.8,000/- per acre and for the extent of Ac.0.40 cents the value of the appeal is Rs.1,400/-. The points that arise for consideration are :- (1) Whether the enhancement granted by the learned Senior Civil Judge is legal and sustainable? (2) To what relief? POINTS:- The learned Senior Civil Judge has taken into consideration the Ex.A-14 whereunder in O.P.No.32 of 1990 for the land acquired for similar purpose the court has enhanced the compensation to Rs.22,000/- but did not take into consideration the market value, though the land in both the claims is under the same reference. Taking into consideration the evidence of PWS.1 to 4 and the other sale particulars, the lower court has enhanced the market value, which is minimal. The lower court also has taken into some potentialities and the income yielding from the nature of the land. There are absolutely no reasons to find fault with the enhancement granted by the lower court. Therefore, the appeal suit is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the points are answered. Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J _______________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J 01-12-2010 TSNR