@ SINGLE BENeH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH BILASPUR‘ WRIT PETITION Is.) No. .wRHF 201 1 / x, Dr R S Dlvedl Balkunth Prasadp¢§&:§§fl aged about 61 years workmg ds Assistant Vetsrinary Surgeon R/o‘. nsar Veterinary Hospital Surajpur, District Suruja (C.G.), V VERSUS / PETITIONER r I 1 ‘ State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, General Administrative ‘ Department D K S Bhawan, Ralpur (C G ) State of Chhattlsgarh Through . The Secretary, Veterinary V Health Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C G ) 3 Director, Veterinary Health SerVIces, OppOSIte Gul utang Bahadur Garden, G E Road V Ralpur (C G ) . Dr. Arun Kumar Singh, Assistant Veterinary Surgeon, Office of Deputy Director, Veterinary Health Service Ambikapur, District r Surguja i (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CON§TITUTION OF ENDI‘A. LumJaJA¢AA£+~Z n-m Ar Ha nwngtiiiamium m (is g RESPONDENTS 4 HEGH COURT GF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SE : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.(Si.NO. 6890 {'201 1 PETETIONER Dr‘RS. Divadi V&1‘Su S RE$PGNEEI€TS State of Chhatiisgarh 8a ’Qthers Shri T.K.Tiwari, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, RL. for tbs State. WRIT PETITION U DER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTXON OF ' INDIA ORDER (23.11.2011) ChaHenge in the present petition is to the order dated 29.102011 (Annexure P/S) passed by the respondent N013 by which the charge of the post of Deputy Director, Veterinary Surgeon has been given to the respondent NO.4 who according to the petitioner, is much junior to him. Contention of Shri Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner is that as per circular dated 4.8.2011 issued by the General Administration Department, it is the petitioner who should have been given the charge of the said post. Counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a detailed representation to respondent NO.8 and in turn the respondent No.3 be directed to decide the said representation. State counsel submits that the petitioner has no vested right to be posted at the particular post and it is for the department to decide as to which officer is to be posted in a particular post. He however has no objection if the petitioner makes any such representation and the same is being decided by the respondent NO.8 in accordance with law; The petitioner is permitted to Withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Needless to state that in the eventuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner, it is expected from the respondent N03 to dece the same in accordance with law. Accordingly; the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at iiberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law, i Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge id