IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8402 of 2005 Between: Smt. Chava Adilakshmi, W/o. Ch.Venkateswarlu, Gowtami Purified Drinking Water Plant, H.No.2-3-40/1, Shantinagar, Dornakal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The M.R.O., Dornakal Mandal, Dornakal, Warangal District. 2 The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Dornakal Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the Water Plant of the petitioner being run at Premises bearing No.3-2-40/1, Shantinagar, Dornakal, Warangal District as without jurisdiction, power or authority, illegal, arbitrary offending art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct respondents not to interfere with the activities of the petitioner in running the water plat at premises No.3-2-40/1. Shantinagar, Dornakal, Warangal District and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.SUDHIR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 8402 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents in interfering with the water plant of the petitioner being run at premises bearing No.3-2-40/1, Shantinagar, Dornakal, Warangal District is arbitrary and illegal. When the matter was taken up for admission, learned counsel for the second respondent, under instructions, stated that the respondents were not interfering with the activities of the petitioner in running the water plant in the premises in question. Recording the same, this Court by order dated 27-04-2005 directed the respondents that they shall not interfere with the activities of the petitioner without following due process of law. No counter affidavit is filed by the respondents and the learned counsel for the petitioner sates that in view of the interim orders, there is no interference as on today by the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the running of the water plant by the petitioner in the premises in question in any manner whatsoever without following due process of law. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 28-11-2008 KLP