1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No.2716 of 2009 In Writ Petition No.1106 of 2009 (The Wardha Nagri Sahakari Adhikosh Bank ltd. v. Regional Provident Funds Commissioner, Nagpur) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.S. Ghate, Advocate for Petitioner. Dr. R.S. Sundaram, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2009. The learned counsel for the respondent states that presently enquiry under Section 7A of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Act, 1952 is only going on. He further states that in that enquiry undertaken for determination of provident fund dues, the petitioner- employer is not co-operating and, therefore, some summons/show cause notices were required to be issued. In the circumstances, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the respondent-Department in that enquiry. Liberty to move for interim order after the said enquiry under Section 7A of the Act is over. At present, Civil Application No.2716 of 2009 is found to be premature. The same is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE pdl.