1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2336 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.378 OF 2005 Baban Ananta Kamble Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.S.N.Bhosale, Advocate appointed for appellant. Mr.D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.R.S.DALVI,JJ. January 09, 2006. P.C. . Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the applicant who has been convicted and sentenced by the learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Baramati for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 498-A of IPC. The said order has been challenged in Criminal Appeal no.378 of 2005 but belatedly and hence this application for condonation of delay. . As per the office note the delay caused is of 155 days. The applicant states that he was ignorant of the limitation period to file the appeal and he was shifted from Baramati Sub-jail to the Yerwada Central Prison. In addition he has elderly parents and, therefore, there was no one to seek legal 2 advice. . We are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned and hence the application is allowed. (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)