s^^ ^ 1 ^S^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COIIRT OF GHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS i.s' W.P.(S)No. 16"^ /2010 y ! ;': '' • .; Smt. Ranjana Singh Thakur, W/o. Sachchidanand Singh Thakur, aged about 42 years, R/o. Ring Road, Namnakala, Ambikapur, District Surguja(C.G.) VERSUS ^ ' ^ 1] State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raigur (C.G.) I f <^ „ . . „„ 2.] Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) • . ., ^ • : . . : • "! 3] Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Surguja, District Surguja ^C.G.) 1. 4] Collector (Tribal 'Welfare), Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ^ • 5] Principal, Higher Secondary School, Rampur, Block Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) . .^"tiEill ^^•:lii 1111. sm WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA 1] PARTICULARS OFTHEPETITIONERrS): HC-22 SIT^I^I Pw* sv^y sh^icfr tifia 'ysi -^W\v\^, »TTI<i'i<6. fiiciiyy 31T^?T IR^? _..Uy..Q.:).....U:. IIICTI a>*<l°h m.^ 200 iq^CT' SII^ITRIIWHfpT SB: Hou'ble Shri Manindra Moltan Shrivastava. J. 16.4.2010 Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Shri Prasunn Bhaduri, coutisel for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents. P4nel Heard. By this petition, the 10th March, 2010 (Annexure P-| been changed from Higher Secondary School, Bishrampur| peqtioner Secijindary Learned counsel for the never made any application applied for posting at Higher submitted that a representatiorl Welfare)/respondent No.4, on no decision has been taken. Taking into consideratioa| respondent No.4/CoUector appropriate decision on the period of 3 weeks from today. <<!l'i<icl<il-< 'RFRlf 4 fezt <Ffltil< ^SlPaqSD^I has challenged the order dated by which the petitioner s posting has School, Rampur to. Girls Higher Ipetitioner submits that the petitioner 9pr modification nor anyone else ever |Secondary School, Rampur. It is also has been made to the Collector (Tribal (2.3.2010 (Annexure P-6), but till date the grievance raised by .the petitioner, (1[ribal Welfare) is directed to take ret?resentation of the petitioner within a [Tft^tfi^ ..•isS-' ii^ .•;*'. ff a. gt ""gxfHC-22 ^ an^rw h-»*sn^i 9ti+iict) yl?fl Praveen s"' •g^ ^)i<<icii|, ^y'iti. rsii'iiyy sy^y xra-g? ,^..U.^.2.J.67^< 'fN^si' IIIICTI sblich 200 311^1 TRnwHfect 2. petitic|ner Until then, if the joined, status quo shall b representation of the petitioner With the aforesaid obseijvations, the petitioia is finally disposed of. In view of the above ordeit Certified copy as per rule ch)'4te'lfl'ri TnTi^f "^ 'f§x5ri'<Ri<^i< ii'SlPffq 311^1 has not been relieved nor anyone maintained until decision of the , I.A. No.l, also stands disposed of. SdA 'S : . Manindra Mohan Shrivastavat Judge