c:'-{?'^( INTHEHIGHISOURTOFCHHATTI^GAKH AT BILASPUR WmTPEmTTON N6.^^/2005 ;/'.. -t PETITIONER DEFEND^NT : y^ Bhismdev S/6 Bhagatram, Aged about- 42 years,R/o. Village- Tilaimal, Pdtwari Hal-ka NO.-T7, Rev&nue^Circle- Khamhai-pali, .TahsiJ- ;^ SaraipalF, ^^^^^© .Matidsdmund (C.G.). ; ' ^~~" RESPONDENTS ^1- Pl.AlNriFFS /^ dated. VERSUS Mus. Gupfa Bai D/o Chdkrqdhar, Aged about- 70 years, Cgs.te- Aghdna,^R/o. yillage- Charbhql'a, Tahsil- Sdraipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.). Dubkunwar D/o. Chakradhar, Agedctbout-55years,R/o.Village- TilaiFnal, E'olice Station & Tal-isil- ^araipdlj^Djstric'l'-MdhQsqi-nund. ©ajpati S/o. Bara trg m, Ag ed abouf- 55 years, Villqge- Tilaimal, Police Statibn & Ta hsiI- Sara ipali, District- Mahasamund (C.G.). VMTPETfTIONUNDE^ARTISMS^OFTHECONSTSTVTION ^'•'C>F^Bf/k.':.':'.-::,;.':'.1''' ••^•t%y..;s^s..-"-^ 5ili:ilii^l' ~^l;.^i.A^"---^:: ^-'~ XI-HG-22 •s^•^s3ssSj'33 vs, (wwy aii^r'w . 'ft-fi'* 3TSSI sbtli* ^ l • '-l.fJ-Pi.'^^'^S. inwiTWfiw •^300^ ^S^SI' sn^f's^giwtitw imder docunkcrit 6.3.800® W.P;Ko.5448/aOOS Shri P.K. Patel, cpunscl feij Heanl bri adnussion. Ttiis is a pet&Kttt filed- 'UIKJI of India; against ttteOTde;r'dateti| CivUJiidgp 'Cl^s-A, Saraipall appears tUat'tIie respomlcnts/pl that the registered WiU-deed-da^ be also declared a foi^cd relief <rf pcrmanenf itynnction. suit] after filing^ 6f IIic written applieation tuuler OEder 6, Rule-[ fhe plaint aad^thiBy sought thc owncr offhe propcrty on the | •wray of adverse ;{x>ssessfon. ;^Tbc| appUcation for ameadmcnt beenffed. . A perusal ofthc platnt for reliefbfdec]aratiori sind the Will-dieed to be a foi^ed is fited at the preliminary stagc that the plainfifFs have also perif possessKm^ tibere^appcars to bc Artfcte 227 afthe Consti.tu.tion |23.8.%05 p^scd by the Comt bf ^i Ctoff Suit No. 13-A/2004. It )£mitifi& filed a suit ICM- declaratioa 'bWld<fl-I^Ws'if'^:!®3t<r»lt(l< ^T SlPtTO 311^1 " thepeytionier. ted ?26.2.%)04 be canc^ted and it along witti Uie Con.scqueatial IDtu-mg thie pendeaicy ofthe Gwil |statetnent) thc ^riainJtifiK fifed aa 117 of th&C.P.C; for amcndanent of fbatihcy luay be dectered |li£ isQfperiectipn ofthen'tMcby lcai-ned tral Judge alloiwcd flieir; wUfch fhis writ pcti.fKxn. fa^s aineildnient aga^ast wojald show that the samc was'fited pcxin|Etneut injunctioa o&tlic gtound of (ioct^meat -and if axiy such a^plieation |ft»rmcorporafmg thc aritendmjcnt icted fhiei^ titteby -way ot adverae i^p-ffle^Uty in (Be ordcr of the triaij XI-HC-22 'ysi 'WW^, 'SiSwiiijhwv'y. sn^rw R-ii* aifisi 5h+llcti 'y^T StM^ l^ :1^/ 3ni[?r iRra? W--P- s''l-i:ti KWCTI Sbtllch ••^^00^" fcl'biiST" SD^ItBITWC^lfcT pu^polse Judge by anowing fhe' appUcatjt C.P.C. Tfae •underlyiug prmciplet fhe Coiirt inay at any tnnc pteadiBgs 6n such telins a^ that magr;be doae fin- the ia controvcrsy between the | undcitying principles is that i^ fhe miiltipllcity '&f Utigations is 'aUbwed pibvidcd tiie saihe is peiidingbcftire^thcQnu-t.; There agpears to 1ae iio^iB|i Coyrtbetem, The petitibn has s^unmarity. ' pplicatjonjuuler OBdcr 6,rlRute: 17^of •thc <+ai^^i'i-4i4-(^['^f^:^ <T;<]i<^i< •^ 3lPOT3)l^[- . ^^uiuler Rute 17' OifOrder fi is that apow cdther af fhe i»rty^^ soiuiilaoas wfaK^inay b^just ^ ^aefermiBing the reat.giiussti'on: parties. Qne of the' ^importatrt- Vy aKXMpbiatmg^ aa lamend1116111? ^tcweii.ted that amendment aiEy be ^rithia the scope of th.e Hs ah»ady ' ^Uty nr the otdeis passcd by fllc i.merits aad thfisauteis disattescd DIQ Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge ['lf^ ^Ra^