IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6003 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 17, 2010 Gram Panchayat Village Ramgarh. …Petitioner Versus Pirthi … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 31.08.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jind, whereby the learned Appellate Court has admitted the appeal against the order passed by the learned Trial Court on an interim injunction application and further directed the parties to maintain status quo. C.R.6003 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the garb of status quo, respondent herein wants to dispossess the petitioner herein. Learned counsel further states that Appellate Court be directed to pre-pone the hearing of the appeal and appellant therein shall be informed by the petitioner about the date fixed preponing the appeal. He further states that in view of the above, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned Additional District Judge, Jind, is requested to pre- pone the hearing of the appeal and to hear the appeal within fifteen days from today. Date so fixed by the learned Appellate Court after pre-poning the appeal shall be informed to the learned counsel for the appellant therein by the learned counsel for the petitioner herein. A copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners under the signatures of the Reader. September 17, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2