LPA No. 1636 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1636 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 01.12.2010 Hans Raj Gupta and others -----Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ---Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 25.02.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.P. No. 11029 of 2009. The appellants were not party in the proceedings before the learned Single Judge when C.W.P. No. 11029 of 2009 was disposed of on 25.02.2010. 2. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, learned counsel for the appellants has raised some legal issues and has argued that the judgment is not well based and the earlier judgment dated 02.11.1993 rendered in C.W.P. No. 7732 of 1993 may not apply. However, all those issues may have to be considered by the learned Single Judge in appropriate proceedings which may be taken out by the appellants. LPA No. 1636 of 2010 (O&M) -2- There is a remedy available to the appellants before the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, they are relegated to any suitable remedy before the learned Single Judge. 3. The appeal stands disposed of. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE December 01, 2010 Atul