- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF OF OF MOTION NO.1865 OF 2003 MOTION NO.1865 OF 2003 MOTION NO.1865 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1918 NO.1918 NO.1918 OF 2003 OF 2003 OF 2003 Rajraj R. Verma ... Plaintiff v/s Jatashankar R. Verma and ors. ... Defendants Mr A.R. Mishra for Plaintiff. None for Defendants. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH J. DATE : 13TH AUGUST 2004 - 2 - P.C.: - 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None appears for the defendants. I have also perused reply filed by the defendants. Ad-interim order has been granted in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) which is operating since 28th July 2003. The learned counsel appearing for plaintiff submits that Court Receiver should be appointed since the suit has been filed under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. In my opinion, considering the relationship between the parties, it will not be appropriate to appoint Court Receiver on the property at this stage. Interest of the plaintiff can be protected by confirming the ad-interim order dated 28th July 2003. Ad-interim order dated 28th July 2003 is confirmed. Notice of motion is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Personal Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ----------------