IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25957 of 2008 PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ YADAV @ PAPPU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 31.07.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence under sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and section 33/41/42 of the Forest Act and section 52 of the Indian forest Amendment Act, 1989. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the first information report it would appear that there is no allegation to the effect that the stone chips alleged to have been carried out was procured from the protected forest area. It is further submitted that as a matter of fact the petitioner is an old licensee and had obtained the said chips on a valid document as contained in Annexure-2 i.e. the receipt dated 03.03.2008 with respect to purchase. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Yadav @ Pappu Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Suryagraha P.S. Case No. 47 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)