IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.21308 of 2008 Between: R.Satyanarayana Rao S/o. Kumaraswamy R/o. Ramnagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. Society for Training and Employment Promotion, (A.P.S.T.E.P) Rep. by its Managing Director, O/o. Commissioner of Youth Services, Secunderabad. 2 The Commissioner Collegiate Education, Government of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Director, College Education, Hyderabad. 4 The Principal, Indira Priyadarshini Govt. College for Women, Nampally, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not concluding the disciplinary proceedings in spite of the enquiry oﬃcers reports in letter No.A/179/2000 dated 30-06-2004, and not paying the retirement beneﬁts since 30-04-2002 under the guise of the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, though the Enquiry Oﬃcer held that the charges are not proved, as high handed and arbitrary action, contrary to Civil Service Rules and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice with a consequential direction to pay the retirement beneﬁts to the petitioner with interest from 30-4-2002 to till date. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.21308 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition so as to enable the petitioner to approach the A.P. Administrative Tribunal to workout his remedies. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, leaving liberty to the petitioner to approach the A.P. Administrative Tribunal and workout his remedies as available under the law. No order as to costs. _________​__________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 26th September, 2008. IBL