[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3927 OF 2008 Ganesh Antram Gangne ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Sudhir Halli Advocate for Applicant Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2009 DATE : JANUARY 12, 2009 DATE : JANUARY 12, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No. 265 of 2006 of Bhosari Police Station, Pune. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant submitted that no role of actual assault has been attributed to the applicant. This fact is not controverted by the learned APP. Thereafter, it is pointed out that co-accused Sudhir Laxman Dengale [-2-] has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 10.10.2008 and the case of the present applicant is the same as that of Sudhir Laxman Dengale and hence, the applicant may be released on bail on the ground of parity. The learned APP admits that the case of the present applicant is the same as that of Sudhir Laxman Dengale. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 4. The applicant-Ganesh Antram Gangne be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.twenty five thousand only) with one or two sureties of the like amount subject to the condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station on every first and third Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. till the conclusion of the trial. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]