IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2010 / 5TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 654 of 2010(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36323/2009 Dated 13/01/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER: PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROBIN C.VARGHESE, CHANGETHU HOUSE, KAIPATTOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. P.VIJAYAKUMAR MR. C.R.REGHUNATHAN MR. M.V.ASHIM MR. B.HARRYLAL RESPONDENT: RESPONDENTS IN THE WRIT PETITION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., CHANDANAPPALLY BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY MANAGER, PATHANAMTHITTA, POST CHANDANAPPALLY, PIN-689 648. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, (AUTHORISED OFFICER UNDER SARFAESI ACT), FEDERAL BANK REGIONAL OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 645. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R. P. No. 654 of 2010 in W.P. (C) No. 36323 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 27th day of July, 2010 ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the only grievance projected in the Writ Petition is that the petitioner might be permitted to clear the entire liability by way of 'OTS' Scheme, instead of making the petitioner to satisfy the same by way of installments. The learned counsel further submits that, the petitioner had already approached the Bank by filing an application as borne by Ext. P2, though no specific figure has been given therein expressing the offer. 2. In the above circumstances, the review petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to file a proper representation with a concrete suggestion as to the amount, for which the liability is sought to be settled, which shall be preferred within one week from today. On receipt of the same, the appropriate orders shall be passed by the respondent Bank, extending such benefit to the permissible extent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks thereafter. The liability of the petitioner will be subject to the outcome of the orders to be passed by the respondent Bank. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd