IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10423 of 2010 LOKNATH PRASAD, S/O LATE CHHATRU MAHTO, R/O MOHALLA PAHARI, P.O. & P.S. SOHSARAI,DISTRICT- NALANDA. Versus 1. THE COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR,PATNA. 2. THE ASSISTANT, PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION),BIHAR, R- BLOCK, ROAD NO.- 6,PATNA. 3. SHRI SHIV PRASAD, DIRECTOR, BIHARSHARIF COLD STERAGE LTD. SINGARHAT, P.O. SOHSARAI, DISTRICT- NALANDA. ----------- 2 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.S. Pradhan, learned senior advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 1st February, 2010 as contained in Annexure-7 this Court directed the respondent no.2 to consider the grievances of the petitioner as highlighted in the previous writ application and the petitioner pursuant to the said order file a representation as contained in Annexure-8 stating details of his claims, however the respondent no.2 has disposed of the representation without considering the points raised by the petitioner in his representation. Mr. Pradhan, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 submits that the claim of the petitioner was considered previously also, however the representation of the petitioner shall be considered afresh and appropriate order shall be passed taking into consideration each and every point raised by the petitioner. Considering the submissions of the parties, the - 2 - order as contained in letter no. 468 dated 20th April, 2010 is, hereby, quashed and the matter is remitted back to the respondent no.2 for passing a fresh reasoned order in accordingly with law considering each points raised by the petitioner in his representation expeditiously preferably within a period of two months on receipt/production of the certified copy of the present order. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)