Criminal Miscellanious No.29992 OF 2006 In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1. SANJAY KUMAR. 2. AJAY KUMAR 3. DILIP KUMAR ALL SONS OF LATE RAJENDRA PRASAD. 4. SMT. RITA DEVI, WIFE OF DILIP KUMAR. 5. REENA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF LATE RAJENDRA PRASAD. 6. MOSTT. URMILA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAJENDRA PRASAD ALL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MURARPUR, GAUTAM BUDHA ROAD, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT GAYA. 7. PRADEEP KUMAR, SON OF SHRI RAGHU PRASAD. 8. RAGHU PRASAD, SON OF LATE KISHUN RAM, BOTH RESIDENT OF MOHALLA TEKARI ROAD, NEAR BARA MORE, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT GAYA. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. SHIV NANDAN PRASAD, SON OF LATE BHAGIRATH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA PURANI GODOWN, GAYA, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT GAYA. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioners :- Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Advocate For the State :- Matloob Rab, A.P.P. For O.P. No. 2 :- None. P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT. SHEEMA ALI KHAN S.A. Khan, J. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 28.4.2006, passed in Complaint Case No. 281 of 2006 taking cognizance for offences under Sections 144, 147, 323, 341, 380, 427, 457, 504, 452/34 and 120B of the - 2 - Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the occurrence had taken place due to a land dispute. There is more than one case pending between the parties. The dispute is for a land bearing Holding No. 108, Ward No. 3, Mohalla- Purani Godown, P.S. Kotwali, District Gaya. 3. I do not find any illegality in the order taking cognizance. This application is accordingly, dismissed. Patna High Court, Dated the 28th April, 2011 N.A.F.R./Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)