THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5196 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.131 of 2006 filed for declaration of title and injunction. As some of the documents were not filed, respondents/defendants filed I.A.No.332 of 2010 in the said suit seeking to receive the documents, which are shown in the annexure. The said I.A. was allowed by the Court below vide order, dated 02.08.2010. In this Civil Revision Petition, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no reasons have been recorded by the Court below in the impugned order while allowing I.A.No.332 of 2010 filed by the respondents. A perusal of the annexure clearly indicates that the documents, which are sought to be filed, are cist receipts, pattadar passbooks, title deeds and pahanies etc. In the affidavit filed in support of I.A., it is stated that the documents were pledged with the bankers for securing crop loans as such there was delay in filing those documents. In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of I.A. and also nature of documents, which are sought to be filed, I do not find any illegality, which warrants interference in the impugned order allowing I.A.No.332 of 2010 filed seeking to receive the documents listed in the annexure, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and it is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 20th JUNE, 2011. kvni