IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 12062 of 2010 in/and Civil Writ Petition No. 6099 of 2010 Ajit Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Civil Writ Petition No. 6099 of 2010 The affidavit of Sh. H.N. Singla, Executive Engineer, Haryana Public Works Department (B&R) Branch, Narnaul is handed over in the Court, today. After making reference to the order passed by this Court, it is disclosed that the petitioner has already been paid salary upto 17.11.2005 and the remaining salary from 18.11.2005 to 31.07.2005 has been calculated as Rs. 5,16,490/- out of this Rs. 83,000/- has been deducted as GPF and Rs. 280/- as GIS subscription, which has been credited in these respective accounts. The balance amount which to be paid is Rs. 4,33,210/-. A draft of Rs. 1,00,000/- has already been paid. The remaining amount has also been deposited in the accounts of the petitioner through District and Sessions Judge, Narnaul on 09.08.2010. It is also stated that in future, monthly salary of the petitioner will be deposited in the account opened in the name of the petitioner, which is to be operated Civil Writ Petition No. 6099 of 2010 (O&M) -2- under the guardianship of District and Sessions Judge, Narnaul. It is disclosed in the affidavit that the Chief Secretary to the Government of Haryana has been requested by the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to the Government, Haryana to issue instructions to the effect that such an employee who become 100% disable and unable to attend the office may be given full salary with increments till the date of superannuation so that financial hardship and agony to such employees can be avoided. Mr. S.S. Dhillon, Secretary, PWD (B&R) Haryana is present in the Court pursuant to the direction issued by this Court. He has assured the Court that action is in hand on his part to get the instructions issued to the Chief Secretary so that such like cases do not reoccur in future. The present writ petition is thus become infructuous and is disposed of as such. C.M. No. 12062 of 2010 Since the Court has already appointed the Guardian on behalf of disabled petitioner, there is no need to pass any order for impleading the applicant/mother of the petitioner to be a party to this writ petition. Application is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 01, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE