IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.14008 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: December 21, 2006 Satbir and others ….Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others …. Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT: Shri Babar Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of Quo Warranto or Certiorari for quashing the appointment of the candidates similar to respondents No.5 to 44. According to the petitioners, the aforesaid similar candidates did not possess the requisite qualifications. After perusal of the record, we find that the candidates whose selections have been challenged have not been impleaded as party in the present writ petition. Consequently, we find that the present writ petition is not maintainable in the absence of the selected candidates. In this view of the matter, we dispose of the present petition with a liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by impleading all the necessary parties. (Viney Mittal) Judge December 21, 2006 (M.M.S. Bedi) KD Judge