1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1039 OF 2009 (Gangadhar s/o Sakharam Tonde vs. Zilla Parishad, Buldana and another) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2009 Heard Shri Dhatrak, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is directed against the show cause notice dated 30.12.2008 issued by the respondent no.1 whereby petitioner is called upon to give his explanation within seven days from the date of receipt of the said show cause notice, which is issued on the basis of enquiry report submitted by the Enquiry Officer. Shri Dhatrak, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that petitioner has submitted his explanation/reply to the respondent no.1. However, decision in this regard has not yet been taken. In the circumstances, cause of action in this regard, in our view, is premature and we are not 2 inclined to show indulgence at this stage. So far as prayer clause (ii) of the petition is concerned, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent Authority for redressal of grievance in respect of non-payment of subsistence allowance. If the petitioner approaches the competent Authority in this regard, we expect the competent Authority to decide the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law at the earliest. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE khj