IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.205 of 2008 RAJMATI DEVI, W/O Late Suresh Mishra, resident of Village & P.O. Chattia, P.S. Malahi, District-East Champaran. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran. 4. The Civil Surgeon, Motihari, East Champaran. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar Government, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna. 6. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Pahaladpur, East Champaran. 7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Motihari, East Champaran. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 27.11.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of provident fund dues. It is submitted that on perusal of paragraphs 7 and 8 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.6 it would appear that the necessary papers for payment of the provident fund dues of the petitioner were sent to the District Provident Fund Officer, Motihari (respondent no.7) as per the registered post vide letter no.93 dated 4.4.2008 by the In charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Prahaladpur, East Champaran. The petitioner, however, has not received the payment. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims 2 as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the Civil Surgeon, Motihari, East Champaran (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, respondent no.4 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that grievances with regard to the payment of the provident fund dues could be settled at the earliest and admissible dues could be paid to the petitioner with statutory interest. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)