AB 1825/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Heard Mr.S.K.Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Goswami submits that steps were taken in the correct address of the o pposite party No.2 as indicated in the registration certificate of the concerned vehicle . Referring to the provision of Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 , learned counsel submits that presumption may be drawn regarding service of notice on the said opposite party. Mr.B.S.Sinha, learned Addl. P.P, Assam appears for the opposite party No.1. Considering the office note dated 23.1.2012 and the provision of Section 27 of G eneral Clauses Act, the Opposite party No.2 is hereby declared to have been se rved. The related application is for condoning the delay of 131 days in filing the related criminal revision petition. On a consideration of the averments made in the petition, I am satisfied that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the related Crl Revision . Accordingly, the delay of 131 days in filing the related Criminal Revision peti tion is condoned. Misc . Case stands allowed.