IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 21092 of 2005 Between: Smt.V.Janakamma ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector (C.S.), Nalgonda and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Challenging the order of the 1st respondent-District Collector passed in Revision Appeal No.CS1/1175/2005, dated 05.09.2005, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, after giving an opportunity to the petitioner, cancelled her authorization as fair price shop dealer as she alleged to have been misused 120.28 quintals of food for work rice. Against that order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent-Joint Collector, who confirmed the order of the 3rd respondent by dismissing the appeal. After lapse of 806 days, the petitioner filed revision before the 1st respondent-District Collector. The said revision was dismissed by the 1st respondent on the ground that the ill health of the petitioner is not supported by any documentary evidence. The order passed by the 1st respondent-revisional authority cannot be said to be illegal or improper since the delay of 806 days in filing the revision has not been supported by any other evidence. Further more nothing is prevented to the petitioner to file a revision petition before the 1st respondent-District Collector through an Advocate. Therefore, the impugned order of the 1st respondent is not shown to be illegal or improper so as to call for interference of this Court. The writ petition is devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________ K.C. BHANU,J Dated: 28.09.2005 Dsr