rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.123 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.123 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.123 OF 2007 IN IN IN MISC.PETITION NO.1 OF 2000 MISC.PETITION NO.1 OF 2000 MISC.PETITION NO.1 OF 2000 IN IN IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 734 OF 1996 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 734 OF 1996 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 734 OF 1996 Smt.Basantidevi H.Jaiswal ..Plaintiff V/s. Raviprakash R.Jaiswal & Ors. ..Defendants AND Sureshchandra R.Jaiswal & Ors. ..Co- Respondents Mr.Vivek Gupta i/b.Gupta & Gupta for the Plaintiff. Mr.M.M.Vashi & Associate for the Respondents. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR J. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . This Notice of Motion is taken out for interim reliefs in the above petition for revokation of the probate issued by this Court. The parties have not insisted on reasons for the following orders : (1) The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (b)(3). : 2 : (2) Mr.Vashi states that reference to Room No.10-11 even in the proceeding intitated by the Respondents was through inadvertence and in fact the reference ought to have been to Room No.11-12. In view thereof he makes a statement that the Respondent is not interested in Room No.10. In view thereof, the Respondent is restrained from dealing with in any manner Room No.10. (3) Mr.Vashi further states that the properties mentioned in prayers (a)(1) and (a)(2) have been dealt with as stated in the affidavit in reply and in particular paragraph 5 thereof. The statements contained therein are accepted. In view thereof, no order is necessary in respect of prayers a(1) and a(2) of the Notice of Motion. 2. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. *******