-: 1 :- wp-1990/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1990 OF 2010 Mrs. Jyoti Sandeep Kale. ..Petitioner. Versus Shri. Sandeep Y. Kale. ..Respondent Ms. Sangita Lidkar a/w Mrs. Neeta Karnik for the petitioner. Mr. Anilkumar Patil for respondent. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : August 11, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. By the impugned order the petitioner's application so far as it relates to relief of grant of interim maintenance to the daughter Anjani is rejected. The petitioner wife and respondent husband both are dentist. Main proceeding, i.e., Petition No.426 of 2009, is filed by the respondent husband against the petitioner-wife under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. In the said petition, the petitioner-wife has filed an application at Exhibit-12 for various reliefs, including the relief for grant of interim maintenance to daughter Anjani at the rate of Rs. 5,000/- per month. The court below by the order impugned, has rejected the petitioner’s prayer for grant of interim maintenance to their daughter and rest of the prayers claimed in application Exhibit-12 are directed to be heard at later stage. 2. Learned counsel for the respective parties argued the matter for srp -: 2 :- wp-1990/10 sometime. Thereafter Mr. Anilkumar Patil, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions from his client, who is present in Court states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay an amount of Rs.3,000/- per month from March 2010, to the petitioner-wife towards the interim maintenance of their daughter Anjani. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to accept and amount of Rs. 3,000/- per month towards interim maintenance for daughter Anjani. Statements of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties are accepted. In view of the statement, petitioner’s grievance so far as interim maintenance to daughter is concerned, it does not survive. The impugned order is modified in terms of the statements recorded above. The petition stands disposed of. 3. Mr. Anilkumar Patil, learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent will deposit arrears of interim maintenance in the trial Court within the period of three weeks from today. Statement is accepted. Respondent is further directed to go on depositing Rs.3,000/- per month towards the interim maintenance of daughter Anjani in trial Court on or before 10th day of every English calender month. The petitioner wife is at liberty to withdraw the said amount. (R.V. MORE, J.)