IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1175 OF 2010 Balkrishna L. Mhatre ....Petitioner V/s. Kamalu J. Mhatre & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Rajesh Datar for the Petitioner. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2010. P.C. :- 1. In the facts and circumstances of this case, the impugned order warrants no interference. The Plaintiff/Respondent has already relied upon an earlier report of the T.I.L.R. That report is not only not admitted but challenged. The mere fact that the order appoints the same authority to make a report, would not prejudice the Petitioner/Defendant. It however requires to be clarified that the report made pursuant to the impugned order would not be conclusive against the parties. The learned Judge has observed that the same would bring on record the factual aspect which is not entirely correct. It is always open to the parties to challenge the same. Further the report itself would have to be proved by the parties desiring to rely upon the same. 2. With the above clarification, the Writ Petition is dismissed.