SINGLE RIT PETITION UNDEk ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION oF mom. FoR ,tssUANcE nF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMu's” CERTIORARI ETc. W @ } 339” IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3 7 00 /2006 UR. Venna,‘ W/o-Shri U.R. Velma, Aged about 42 years, Presently working as Health Worker / Health Centre a / Primary Centre — Lakhanpur, Division— Charama, Distt. North Bastar (Kanker), Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS ' State of Chhatt1sgarh§ Raipur, Chhattisgarh. a l 2. Collector; Kanker, Distt. North Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chieflwl/ledical & Health Officerf \ Distt. North Bastar, Karrker; RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh. XI-HC—78 WW,W,W a? Maviwmxag o ¢o¢oooo.o‘... ..o.o. 'u‘rg 200 WW (W) mmm WWW WWWEfWWA évmm ‘ mmwm 7.8.2b06 Heard Mr, Pankaj Shrivasta’va, Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. By this petition the petitioner has chalienged his transfer order dated 21.7.2006 whereby he has been trarsferred from Sub Heaith Centre, Lakhanpuri, Division Charama, District North Bastar to Primary Heaith Centre, Koyiibeda. -The main grievance of the pe passed byv respondent No.3-Chief M dated 6.7.2006 passed by responder the transfer poiicy, whereas, responi order dated 6.7.2006 and it ought to h: Therefore, iearned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be aiiowed to make a detaiied representation to respondent No.2 and in torn, he be after following the procedure envisaged in the which Mrs. Ahuja, learned Dy. Govt. Adv. for Advocate for the petitioner. Advocate for the State on advance copy. titioner is that the impugned order has been edicai & Health omcer modifying the order 1t No.2—Coliector, Kanker in accordance with tent No.3 was not competent to modify the we been done by the Coilector himself. directed to decide the representation transfer poiicy for the year 2006-07, tc the State has no objection, Having heard learned counsel & circumstances of the case, withoUi case, the petitioner is aiiowed to make within 10 days from today aiong with respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law after considering the objection raised by the petitioner and also the transfer policy for the year 200607 within 3O d in the meantime, the effect 21.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) in respect petitioner is already not relieved. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P,No.30é 0/06 & l.A. No.7432/06 also of. Certified copy as per rules. for the parties and having regard to the facts expressing any opinion on the merit of the a detailed representation to respondent No.2 copy of this petition & annexures and in turn. ays from the date of receipt of representation. & operation of the impugned order dated of the petitioner shall remain stayed, if the stand disposed / Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge 3f (1§/v l