IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11572 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no. 721(c) of 2004 in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 427 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Munger. It appears that initially, the complaint case was lodged which ultimately registered as a police case. Though, the accusation is that an agreement was made between complainant and the petitioner for transfer of the land for Rs. 40,000/-, out of which, Rs. 30,000/- was paid and the complainant was ready to make payment of rest Rs. 10,000/- but in spite of that, the sale deed was not executed. It further appears that the accusation was fond false and final form was submitted and cognizance has been taken on protest on 31.10.2005 2 when the present bail application has been filed in the year 2011. The processes under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have also been issued and then the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was filed. This court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks keeping in view that the accusation was found false by the police and dispose of the regular bail application of the petitioner preferably on the same day. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)