IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11711 of 2008. Decided on: 01.04.2011. ___________________________________________ Deep Raj. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Madan Lal Tomar and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No.6018 of 2008, decided on 22.3.2010. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. Annexure A-5, dated 15.12.2004 is quashed and set aside. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. April 01, 2011. (sck).