Crl.M.No.M-10103 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-10103 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 6, 2010 Iqbaljit Singh and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.S.Athwal, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.35, dated 13.3.2010, under Sections 323, 324, 341, 148, 149 and 120-B IPC subsequently added Section 326 IPC, registered at Police Station Mahilpur, District Hoshiarpur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully. The allegations against the petitioners-accused are that petitioner-accused Bhupinderjit Singh was armed with datar and petitioner- accused Iqbaljit Singh was armed with sword. They alongwith Inderjit Singh caused injuries to three persons, namely, Jaspal, Sandeep and Harpal with sharp edged weapons. Jaspal, Sandeep and Harpal received one injury each on their heads besides other injuries. Petitioners are the main accused and actually caused injuries to the injured with sharp edged weapons. The petitioners alongwith co-accused had come on tractor and stopped the injured on the way and caused injuries. No accused has been Crl.M.No.M-10103 of 2010 (O&M) -2- arrested so far. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, petitioners are not entitled for extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition filed by petitioners-Iqbaljit Singh and Bhupinderjit Singh, for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed being devoid of any merit. 6.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge