skt/- 1 50.wpl 859.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 859 OF 2010 Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ... Petitioner Vs. Uttan H. Bambale ... Respondent ...... Ms.Kavita Anchan i/by M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for the Petitioner. Ms.Pooja Thorat for the Respondent. ...... CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATE : 27th JULY, 2010. P.C. 1 The Officer of the petitioner and the respondent is present in Court. The advocates of both the parties present. There shall be an order in terms of Consent Terms, duly signed by the Officer of the petitioner as well as the respondent and the advocates of the parties. The respondent is present in Court states that he understands the Consent Terms and has signed the same. The respondent is explained that he is not given any monetary benefit for the period between his dismissal and reinstatement and that he shall have to start his employment again. The Consent Terms is taken on record and marked ‘X’. 2 The Writ Petition disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.]