IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 3543 of 2003 Between: 1 V.Sricharan Reddy, S/o.V.Sreenvisa Reddy, R/o.3-10-20/9/1, Ramanthapur, Gokhale Nagar, Hyderabad. 2 K.Harish Kumar, S/o.K.Venkata Laxman, Viswajyothi Aprartments, Brahmanwadi, Begumpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary, A.P.State Council of Higher Education, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Secretary, Board of Adult Education & Training Pankha Road, New Delhi. 4 The Secretary, Board of Adult Education & Training Southern Regional Officer, 4-5-403, Sulthan Bazar, Hyderabad. 5 The Correspondent, St.John's College of Engineering, errakota, Yemiganur, Kurnool dist., 6 The Cortrespondent, J.B.Institute of Engineering, Yenkapally, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy Dist., .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of order or direction more particularly one in the natue of writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondents in purporting tocancell the admissions of the petitioners in B.E. Course for the academic year 2002-2003 on the ground that as per the Notification of the d1st respondent dated 6.8.2002, the pass in Uttara Madhyama Course from the Board of Adult Education is not equivalent tointermediate course is illegal, arbitrary and direct the respondents not to cancel the admissions of the petitioners and permit them to prosecute and complete higher studies on the basis of pass in Uttara Madhyama Course and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3543 of 2003 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the interim order granted on 27-02-2003 stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 29-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SAM}