IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15733 of 2007 RANJAN KUMAR GUPTA @ RANJAN KR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 4/7/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks the relief of selection to the post of Panchayat Teacher in the reserved category of a handicapped person. He is aggrieved by his non-selection despite having higher marks. The controversy is cut short by reason of Annexure-10 issued by the statutory authority under Rule-18 of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 recording the finding that the petitioner had been wronged and giving directions for his appointment. A supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner today that the statutory authority had written to the District Magistrate that certain other functionaries were not complying with the order of the statutory authority. Learned counsel for the State fairly conceded that these are purely administrative matters. The Court refuses to take the administrator’s burden. The writ application is, therefore, disposed with directions to the official respondents to ensure that administrative decisions are implemented and that this Court is not compelled to perform the role of an administrator. - 2 - Let such compliance be done within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )