49# S- * IN TIIE HIGH COURT OF + w.P.(cRL) 1364120rr AFAQ HUSSAIN Through: VETSUS STATE & ORS DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate. 7 ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Urvi Kuthiala, Advocate for Mr' Rajesh Mahajan, Standing Counsel for the State with SI SatYendra' CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 03.10.2011 By this petition the Petitioner seeks registration of FIR. In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors-, 2004 (7) scc 768, Minu Kumari & Anr. v/s state of Bihar & ors (2006) 4 SCC 359 and Aleque Padamsee & Ors v/s UOI & Ors, 2007 (6) SCC I7I has held that since an altemate remedy of filing a complaint case under Section 200 Cr. p.C. along with an application under Section 156 (3) Cr. P.C. is available to the petitioner, the writ petition seeking directions for registration of the FIR is not maintainable. Since an alternative remedy is available to the Petitioner he is at liberty to approach the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for the same' The present petition is dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the learned Metropolitan Magistrate by filing a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. read with Section 156 (3) Cr.P'C' fi^r"Xfr" /7-79-- 'MUKTA GUPTA, J. ocToBER 03, Z0lll'vn' Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified