(L3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’N‘ISGARH ' BILASPUR W.P. tC) No. 163 01‘2009 Petitionels 1. Kirtandas, S/o Govinddas, aged about 50 yams. Sujan, S/o Bhagau, aged about 36 veals Santxam, S/o JugafSingh, agei aboilt 42 ycau-s. 4. Smt. 'l‘ala‘bai, W/o Damian, aged about 65 years. WN- Deasi Ram, S/o Nohar Singh, ag6d about 41 years. Sukdco, S] o Lal Singh, aged about 4O years. Kartikram, S/ o Ramcharan, aged about 55 years. 8. Mayamm, S/o Ramnath, aged about 38 yeam. 9. Tularam, S/o Ramnath, aged about 42 yeam. 10. Shyamnath, S/o Makhnu, aged about 39 years. 1 1. Mohansai, S/ o Selhu, aged about 35 years. 12. Mohittam, S/o Nanki, aged about 43 Slears. 13. Fagulai, S/ o Dayaram, aged about 52 years. 14. Aghan Singh, S] o Bisahu, aged about 52 years. 15. Ram Prasad, S/o Bud‘hram, aged about 32 yeaxs. A11 petitioners are leside'nt of Gram Panchayat Ganjai Bhauna, Janpad Panchasrat Sarangarh, District Raigarh C.G. Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, thmugh the Secretary Panchayat Depariment, ‘DKS Bhawan, Raipur (LG. 2. The Collector, Raigarh, Distdct Raigarh C.G. The Sub Divisional O$cer (Revenue),, Saxangarh, District Raigarh C.G. The Gram Panchayat Ganjai Bhauna, 4. Through the Secretaly, Tahsil Sarahgarh, " Distddt Raigarh C.G. ‘ Chhabilal Netam, S/o Moharsai, aged about 45 years, Panchayat Karmi, Gram Panchayat Ganjaibhauna, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh QG. WRIT PETITION UNDER AR’I‘ICLE 22b OF’I‘HE CONSTITUTION OP‘ INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satisn K. Agninoni J.) Shxi Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate General with Shn’ Shashank ’I‘hakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. l to 3. . AW ORDER V '1 U (Passed on this 14m Day ofJanuary, 2009) 1. The petitioners seek a direction to the Iespondents No. 2 and 3 i.e. Collector Raigarh and Sub Divisional O$1cer (Revenue), Sarangarh, District Raigarh to issue ration caxds to the petitioners and further provide them rice under Mukhyamantri Khaddyan Sahayata Yojna, every month and to take action against the respondent No.5, as per law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the pe1itioners are not getting rice at the rate of Rs. 3/— per k.g. as prescribed under the scheme. Thus, they have made complaint (Annexure P/3) to various authorities. l-le submits that the Collector, Raigarh may be directed to take appropriate action on L the complaint tiled by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondenm/ State has no objection to the above submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4. In View ofthe above this petition is disposed ofwith the direction to the Collector, Raigarh to look into the matter and pass aPPl‘OPriate order, in accordance With law. ‘\ Sdl— i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge