IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 887 OF 2006 Dr. Sandeep Krishna Shirali ... Petitioner V/s. Municipal Corp. of Greater ... Respondent Mumbai & Ors. None for the petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for respondent No.1. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for respondent Nos. 4 to 8. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 18th April, 2006 : 18th April, 2006 : 18th April, 2006 P.C. . The order of 2nd March, 2006 has noted the statement of the petitioner that the terms have been arrived at between petitioner and respondent Nos. 4 to 8. No doubt, the respondent Nos. 4 to 8 were asked to file affidavit. On behalf of respondent Nos. 4 to 8 the learned Counsel makes statement that temple has been constructed but not on the petitioner’s land. The statement is accepted. In view of the above, petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]