IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15402 of 2011 Gopal Pandey Versus Ashok Kumar Pandey & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 13.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that if the five daughters of late Satya Narain Pandey added as plaintiff, there will be conflict in interest between the petitioner and the five daughters. From perusal of the impugned order dated 05.07.2011 passed by Subordinate Judge X, Patna in title eviction suit no.64 of 2002, it appears that only substitution application has been allowed and the five daughters are directed to be added as party. There is no mention in the ordersheet that they will be added as plaintiff in the suit. It is well settled that the plaintiffs who have got conflicting interest cannot be added as plaintiff in the suit. From perusal of the writ application, it appears that the petitioner has not made the said five daughters who have been allowed to be substituted as party-respondent in this writ application. From perusal of the impugned order, it further appears that the learned Court below has assigned reasons for allowing the application and, therefore, I find no jurisdictional error. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)