1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2007 Meghna Parekh Nee Vora. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ... Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4324 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra. ... Applicant. V/s. Sudhir Trimbaklal Parekh & Ors. ... Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2491 OF 2008 Meghna Parekh Nee Vora. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ... Respondent. Mr. Amit Desai i/b. V.M. Sharma for the Applicant in Revn. 274/07. Ms. Racheeta R. Dhuru for the Respondents in Revn. 274/07 and W.P. 2491/08. Mrs. P.P. Bhosle, APP for the Applicant in Appln. 4324/09. Mr. S.V. Kotwal for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in Appln. 4324/09. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 28th JANUARY 2010. P.C. :- During the pendency of this Revision Application it appears that the State has preferred an application seeking leave to challenge the acquittal of the accused. 2 2. In terms of the amendment in Cr.P.C. and more particularly, Section 378 thereof, by the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 2005 which has been duly notified, the application seeking leave will have to be heard by the Court of Sessions. Accordingly, by consent of parties, the record is transmitted to the appropriate Sessions Court which shall deal with the application so also the pending Revision Application in accordance with law. Registry to send the R & P expeditiously. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)