CF-5 -a-d •mKi K EP^ri- Ku.iS Q 75 n A^ tn+h ..•••".y- \0?">''l<i.-*^* ..••' i.<^.y-:iii^A\'V" kA'i ^y ;c^'' ..ay ^-' \^' ^- ^GOYi^ r^^r' ci, nyeu dutji Assistant Teacher, !n .Sc.hnni i^WdVciiil, r-Champa (C.G.) re, S/o. Shri hare, Aged about 45 tf^" School - Jarve (Champa), 3. ../ Harprasad Kurrey, S/o. Hira Lai Kurrey, Aaed abo'jt 38 vears, k - Baioda, ;a ii/.'o. : > iion, D.K.S, ifinn '2. Di / Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur District Education Officer, Distt. - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) g j HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 875 of 2007 Petitioners Itesponctents Petitioners Dhoni Ram Banjare and others Versus Re^iondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others W. P. (5) No. 876 of 2007 Petitioners : Hemant Kumar Ratre and another Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others And W. P. (5)No. 887 of 2007 Birbal Prasad Sonwoni ond others Versus Reqiondents : Sta-te of Chhatt-isgarh &others Single Bench: Honfcle Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for -the Petitioners. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for the S'tate/resfiondents. ORDER (Passed on this 14th day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers m the govemment schoot. In the course of -their services os Assistont Teochers, the petitioners have obtained B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses before 1.3.1999. 2. Learned counsel <q)pearing for the' petitioners submits thdt the question irivotved, herein osto whether the teachers, who obtained B.T.I. Excunination Cert-ificates on their own expenses, are entitled to two advwice increments. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of -this Court in -the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporotitm. Durg and another {2006 CD3 AAPJR-C696}. This Court in •the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, t)urg and cnother (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who hod obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their ovm expenses, are covered by •the circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/7) issued by the State fiovernment of AAadhya Pradedi. 4. Leamed counsel for tiie petitioners furHier submits •that the facts and question of taw involved in the present ca«are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mimicipal Corporation. Durg and another (Supro), to which leamed counsel cppearing for the respondents fairly concedes oid agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appeanng for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, •the writ petition is altowed in terms of the order passed in -the case of yashwarrt Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Cwporation. Durg and another (Supra), aib^ct to verification of the fact us to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Examination Cert'ificotes on their own expenses os per the circuhrs dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 ond furt-her whether they have been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. Boblu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge isa