IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2637 of 2011 RAM CHARITRA SINGH & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and Sri Ahtasham Ali Khan learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is against one Arun Kumar to have first got another person added as Co-account holder, then credited a cheque issued by the L.I.C. which was encashed through ATM. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of the said Arun Kumar who alleged that the petitioners used to assist him to open fake account. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that no recovery has been made from the petitioner nor it is alleged against the petitioners to have opened forge bank account. It is further submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. This contention has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. 2 Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners namely, 1. Ram Charitra Singh, 2. Raman Kumar, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 215 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the petitioners shall be accepted provisionally which only be confirmed within a period of two months when it is found that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)