IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 LA.App..No. 502 of 2005() ------------------------- LAR.55/1999 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... APPELLANT(S): APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ADDL. GOVT. PLEADER BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.C.R.SHYAM KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS/RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- M.A.KARIM, AGED 58, SAMAJAM, MADANVILA, PERUMATHURA P.O., CHIRAYINKEEZH TALUK. ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL,JJ ------------------------------------------------- L.A.A No.502 of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J Eventhough apparently attractive grounds have been raised and further submissions were raised before us by Mr.C.R.Shyam Kumar, the learned Senior Government Pleader, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal any longer. Having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that the market value of the land under acquisition arrived at by the learned subordinate judge is more or less the correct market value at the relevant time. The enhancement awarded by the reference Court towards the value of the coconut trees also cannot said to be excessive. We dismiss this appeal, however without any order as to the cost. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K.HARILAL JUDGE ab