IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46348 of 2007 BABULAL THAKUR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 07.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The two petitioners are husband and wife as stated by the counsel. O.P. no.2 has filed complaint case which is complaint case no. 851 C/2003, cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under sections 498(A), 323, 406 and 494 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel submits that it is a case of false accusations and assertions because petitioner no.1 has already married with petitioner no.2 have several children. He has nothing to do with O.P. No.2 and because O.P. No.2 was impleaded as a party and she has appeared through a counsel but despite several indulgence and adjournments there is nobody to rebut the assertions of the petitioners. Looking at the generality and allegation which have been made in the complaint petition, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, let the petitioners namely Babulal Thakur and 2 Seema Devi, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 851 C/2003 subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)