IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2008 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 9312 of 2008(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ VIDHYADHARAN, AGED 67 YEARS, PLAVILAKATHVEEDU, T.C.5/515, NEETHI NAGAR, 159, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.AHZAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SECRETARY, VATTIYOORKAVU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 9312 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 19, 2008 JUDGMENT The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P2 putting the petitioner on notice that he shall vacate from the premises mentioned therein on the allegation that it is a puramboke land. Disputing the contents of Ext.P2, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 and filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P2. 2. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P2 is only a notice, in my view, it is a matter for the 2nd respondent to decide in the light of Ext.P3 objection now filed by the petitioner. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 2nd respondent shall take a final decision on Ext.P2 in the light of Ext.P3 and after putting the petitioner on notice and after affording him an opportunity of hearing as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. In the meantime further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 will stand WP(C) 9312/08 Page numbers stayed. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-