IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8880 of 2010 RAM DAYALU SHARMA SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAHPUR, KHURD, P.S. GORAUL, O.P. KATAHARA, DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, MECHANICAL (NORTH BIHAR) PATNA 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, MECHANICAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.H.E.D., MECHANICAL DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PAY FIXATION CELL, MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA ----------- 2 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is not being paid the retiral benefits on the pay-scale of Rs. 3050-4590/- to which he is entitled as the authorities have not taken any decision in this regard finally although the matter was sent by the respondent no.3 to the respondent no.4 for taking appropriate decision. It is submitted that on account of not deciding higher pay scale of the petitioner the full retiral dues are not being paid causing serious financial hardship. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, - 2 - petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 with copy to the respondent nos. 4, 5 & 6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and in case the representation of the petitioner finds favour the pensionary benefit of the petitioner may be revised. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)