IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 992 of 2008 BHANWR LAL V/S COMMISSIONER,C.A.D.,IGNP,BKN & ORS Mr. DK PARIHAR, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. KR SAHARAN DYGC, for the respondent Date of Order : 20.7.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the impugned order of the learned Single Judge, and that of the Tribunal below. It has been concurrently found that the petitioner has not shown that he may be entitled to encashment of any such leave, and leave was available in his leave account. In that view of the matter, when by the orders Annexure-4 and 5 his absence has been regularised only by granting extra ordinary leave if necessary, it cannot be said that the impugned orders require any interference in our appellate jurisdiction. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/