c^ieo^. IN VOGQ COURT CHHATTISGASH AT SB.ASPUR W.P.(s)No. ...^........J20 PETITIONEB:":.. ^webRam Sato S/o Sfari Kactara Ram Sahu aged about 46 yeais, Assistant Teacfaer Middie Schoot Badara: Tola, Biok- C3Auria District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^^^" ^" ..••" ^•^'y/Y-'"" ^^•A' A®'T w: •s-' \^ ^••' y^: ,..-•" VERSUS y RESPONDENT8 : ,L: Stete of Chhattisgarh Throu^i Secretaiy Department of Edacation Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) /' ^•'s ^ ^ r<,'.^&^ 2: Disttic^ Edueatioa Officer, Chhuria, <<t":?^ 1 (1 [/r\ DistrictRajnandgaon(C.G.) ^^\^ '".c^ ec^^/. G.6 ^3: BIock Education Offlcer Block \o Cfafauria District - Rajnaadgaon G^'1' (C.G.) / WMT PETmON V/A 226/277 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSVANCE OF WRITS IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIOSARI AN& FOROTHER SUITABLE WRITSA?®DIRECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly and re^iectfuliy begs to submit as under.- MSLCSSJKTW CKHATIZS6ARH AT BILASPUR SW6LEBENCH L HON'BLE Mft. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. Petitioner WRTT PETTHON (S.) N0. 464 OF 2007 t-temrai Kumbhkar versus Respondents : Slate of Chhattisgarh <md others WRFT PFTITION (S.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoonclents versys Siddharth Choure State of Chharttisgarh and o-thers WRIT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Keaondents Panch Ram 5ahu State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTTPEmiON ^S.INO^ 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents ywsus Manharon Lul Prthauro State of Chhatl'isgarh and ol+iers WRTT PFTTTION (S.l N0. 4680F 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Yoggoya Datta Baghel State of Chhatt'isgarh nnd others WRIT PETmON tS.) N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner yersus Resoondents Shib Khoperchxy State of Chhdttisgarh and others WRTT PETmON tS.) N0 470 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Radhey Kishun Patcl Storte of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETHTON t6.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner : Atongon Lal versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond olhers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Dhal Smgjn Sonwani State of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETTTION (S.l N0. 473 OF 2007 Petjtioner Respondents versus Onknr Lal Sonboir Storte of Chhattisgarh ond olhers WRTT PETTTEON (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petrt'ioner : Shiv (Cumar Sharma versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON tS.) N0. 475 OF 2007 Petitisner Reaondents versus Rajendro Kumar Sogar State of Chhatl'isgarh and olhers WRTT PETITION (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus AAakhankil Thakur State of Chhcrttisgarh and others WRTT PFrmON (S.) N0. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner verais Resoondents Fool Chand Kamleshwar State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PFTTriON (S.) N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner versys ftespondents Rajendra Kumar Dewongan State of Chhatt-isgarh and others And WRTT PETinON (S.t N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents wrsys Jaymt Kumor Shendey State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others 1. Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitwners. Mr. Sushil t>ubey, ©ovemment Advocate for 'the StaWrespondents. OROER ffassed on 24th Dey of Januory, 2007) Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioners as imell as leamed Govemment Advoccrte appearffg for the State/re^pondents jointly submit that 1he facts and question of k»w mvolved m the present batch of writ petitions are squarety covered by the decision of this Court- m the cose. of yealwmrt' Kmiar Wwradwe^ vs. Munlepal Corpmwtton. ^lMy emd aiwthM^. 2. In subsequent cases. i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (Sopesfi Kww Vwimim. Ths State Swf. of C'hlwHiywh wid mwthw) and other connected matters, decided by -this ^_^-^a5@i6t S|^ Courton 15-12-2006, puraimt to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Seconckiry Education, Bhopal and -the prospectus of biploma m Education Examination, it was ctarified that •the nomenckiture of the Basic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed ond renamed os Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, -the D.Ed. Cert-ificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jBopedi Kumar Vermavs. The State Sovt. of Chhatlisgarh and evwt/iet) (Supra). 3. For •the aforementioned reasons, -the writ petitions are di^iosed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashmmt f&imar BfiaradHwj (Supra}, aibject to verification of -the fact as to trfiether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./tS.Ed. Certificates at -their own expenses as per the circutars ctated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 <md fur-ther whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of 1+iis order be ptaced on the record of •the connected writ oetitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 Z006ffI)MPJR-C696 Thakur