IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1163 of 2006 YAMUNA LAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 1.10.2010 Heard learned for the parties. The only reason why this Court does not want to entertain the claim of petitioner is that the claim and benefit of time bound promotion is being made from the year 1981 and the writ application filed in 2006 when the scheme has already been withdrawn as far back as 1.1.96. If the respondents have granted 1st time bound promotion to him he should be happy. This court is not willing to consider the claim of the petitioner due to delay and latches on the face of it. Even otherwise the stand of the respondent is that the petitioner is not eligible for second time bound promotion. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)