IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19675 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ REKHA.T., HOUSE NO.8/241, TD WEST GATE, SOUTH CHERALAI, MATTANCHERRY P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 002. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRA NATH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686 560. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19675/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE FINAL YEAR B.COM EXAMINATION. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY DATED 14.7.11 ALONG WITH FEE PAID RECEIPT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 15.7.2011 ALONG WITH FEE PAID RECEIPT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 19675 OF 2011 (H) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a B.Com student. The petitioner had appeared for the third year examination in Paper XII viz. Capital Market and Financial Services and she could get only 53 out of 80 marks. She expects more marks in this subject. She applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp