:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.9 OF 2007 PETITION NO.9 OF 2007 PETITION NO.9 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.749 OF 1997 NO.749 OF 1997 NO.749 OF 1997 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.193 OF 1993 PETITION NO.193 OF 1993 PETITION NO.193 OF 1993 M/s.Ajanta Engineering Corporation ..Petitioner Vs. M/s.Dattatraya Krishna Sandhu Brothers Chembur Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Atul Rajadhyaksha, Senior Advocate with Mr.V.V.Jogalekar i/b. Pardiwala & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.F.D’vilre, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vatsal Shah i/b.Madekar & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.H.BHATIA, J.H.BHATIA, J.H.BHATIA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2007 : 27TH JUNE, 2007 : 27TH JUNE, 2007 (In (In (In chamber at 2.30 ) chamber at 2.30 ) chamber at 2.30 ) P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents. We have perused the order dated 10th November,2006 and also the subsequent correspondence entered upon between the Petitioner and the Petitioner’s former Advocate. 2. The learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner has referred to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Smt.Jamilabai Abdul Kadar Vs. Smt.Jamilabai Abdul Kadar Vs. Smt.Jamilabai Abdul Kadar Vs. Shankarlal Shankarlal Shankarlal Gulabchand and Others AIR 1975 SC 2202, Gulabchand and Others AIR 1975 SC 2202, Gulabchand and Others AIR 1975 SC 2202, :2: especially paragraph No.8. However, the learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner fairly conceded that the Petitioner has not taken any action against his former Advocate, till date. The learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents also referred to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Byram Byram Byram Pestonji Gariwala Vs. Union Bank of India and Pestonji Gariwala Vs. Union Bank of India and Pestonji Gariwala Vs. Union Bank of India and others others others AIR 1991 SC 2234 AIR 1991 SC 2234 AIR 1991 SC 2234 and also the subsequent judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Jineshwardas Jineshwardas Jineshwardas (D) (D) (D) by LRs. and Others Vs. Smt.Jagrani and another by LRs. and Others Vs. Smt.Jagrani and another by LRs. and Others Vs. Smt.Jagrani and another AIR AIR AIR 2003 SC 4596 2003 SC 4596 2003 SC 4596. 3. We do not find any ground made out for review. Having regard to the aforesaid judgments in Byram Byram Byram Pestonji Pestonji Pestonji Gariwala Vs. Union Bank of India and others Gariwala Vs. Union Bank of India and others Gariwala Vs. Union Bank of India and others and Jineshwardas (D) by LRs. and other Vs. Jineshwardas (D) by LRs. and other Vs. Jineshwardas (D) by LRs. and other Vs. Smt.Jagrani Smt.Jagrani Smt.Jagrani and another and another and another, we are not inclined to entertain the Review Petition. Hence, the same stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)