(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 914 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 224 OF 2004 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N.N. Sardessai, advocate for the applicants. Mr. R. G. Ramani, advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATE : 17th December, 2004. P.C.: Heard Mr. N. N. Sardessai, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. The applicants have filed Writ Petition No.224 of 2004 but in the petition memo the names of the legal representatives of respondent no.1 were not incorporated and, therefore, this application to amend the petition memo accordingly. 2. Mr. Sardessai has placed before me a certified copy of the application at Exh.16 filed in Misc. Civil Appeal No.83/2000 on or about - 2 - 9th June, 2002, for bringing on record the names of the said respondents, i.e. Walfrido Olderico Jose Lactancio S. da Conceicao Antao and by Order dated 4th March, 2003, the said application came to be allowed by the lower Appellate Court. 3. However, it appears that when the impugned Order came to be passed on 3rd March, 2004, the names of the legal representatives of respondent no.1 were not incorporated in it. 4. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 5. However, it is made clear that the petitioners would have to approach the lower Appellate Court for correcting the names of the parties in the impugned Order and file a fresh copy of the same. - 3 - 6. Issue fresh notices to the newly added respondents in Writ Petition No.224 of 2004. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. mc.