1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 739 of 2001 (Arvind Govindrao Gosavi Vs. Sadashiv Trimbakrao Kulkarni & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 21 st October, 2008 Heard Shri Anup Dhore, the learned counsel holding for Shri A.K. De, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has expired during the pendency of the writ petition and the legal heirs of the petitioner, if any, have not approached the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE RMP