Sa^SLE B£N| IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPj (C.G.} WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3,0, fe OF 2006 (SERVICE MATTER1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION_QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIQRME, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND/OR A SUITABLE DIRECTION OR ORBEE TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER PETITIONER: </' Hemant Kumar Namdev Age-36 years ^- ^S/o Late Shri L.P. Namdev, .a.Te.a.cher,. Central .lall ^A^--;-^^-^.. Presently postedjs. ^...-•~ •-——-—- 1—1 7-:-'"'->'".''•?" ..•••""" Ambikapur, District- >* .»--&* 1 - -*** . .---^ .„ ...... •^.-- t-f^'.f ^^£- Surguja (C.G.). ^<<...- ^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ralpur ^^3tr??*%, .__ 7 -"--——- •--•---,-.-.--. W '".--—:~N'?'t , (C.G.). <! -s ^•^ ^T-" S \\ ^l. i • 3s^^< ;¥.•;.;. ./ *&' ^f '%ri?y „ ^ ^-^^^on^ ^^^^'^ ^ ° 'i^ .jy^^- ^^ s ^l. InspectorGeneralofPolice (Prison) Jail Headquarter, Central Jail premises, Raipur (C.G.). DETAILS_OF THE PETITIQN -fS ,-.«' r^- XI-HC-78 3^'S(FTRra', giTny'16, Rli-liyy ^l^dl fhWfh •U);fA\D,.;^.(?.|.^...^. ^^Q ^ 3n^?TT3g? (>yi^si<^r) an^rwf^iN; (PIT3n^rsht(ich Ban/e 5TOTW d1?cr sti^r 21-7-2006:- Heard Shri Sandeep Dubgy, a Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/re|spondents, on advance copy. By the instant'petition, the peti dated 23-6-2006 passed by respon been transferred frCTn Central Jail, Anrjbikapur to Distrtet Jail, Raigarh. Leamed counsel for the petiti^ner submitted that the petitioner's wife IstakingtreatmentatAmbikapur. Moi Ambikapur has written a letter that petjtioner should not be fransferred. cireumstances, the petitioner may jeover, the Superintendent, Central Jail, there are no offteers, therefore, the Counsel further submitted that in the be allovfed to make a detailed representation to respondent No.1 antl he be directed to deckte the same, to which learned counsel for respondent^ Having heard leamed counsef facts and circumstances of the case, the merit ofthe case, the prayer mad^ just, fair and reasonable. Thweforel detailed representation along with grievances to respondentNo.1 withif lurn, respondent No.1 shall decide tl| days from the date of receipt crf the after oonsidering all the points raise< law. WHh the direction afor^aid, th^ petition stands dfeposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.28p9/2006 stands disposed of. Partiesare entitled for certified|copy ofthis order. l=hi<ifct41-i Hi><til'^''te^<faiwi<. ^sri^Tsn^r unsel for the petitioner and Miss Dipali ioner has questioned his transfer order ent No.1 whereby the petHioner has has no objection. for the parties, .having regard to the and without ecpressing any opinion on by leamed counsel for the petitioner is the petitioner is aflowed to make a copy of this petition rafeing all his a period of 10 days from-today and in ie representation within a period of 30 epresentation, in an objective manner, by the petitioner, in accordance with Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. Ifr