C/f: Tab 2,.— IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU WRIT PETITION [s1 No. $56 (2007 PETITIONEQ :-/wAmit Kumar Shrivastava son of Shri Ramchandra Lal Shrivastava, aged about 25 years, Occupation- service, Presently posted as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, at Boys Primary School, Durgukondal, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District — Kanker [Chhattisgarh] NATURE'OF M$NDAMUS‘ CERTIORARI A§D(OR A SU;TABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE. N r EERSUS :VRESPONDENTS :- 1] /" Secretary State of Chhattisgarh, through- Department of Panchayat and Raipur Social [Chhattisgarh Welfare, ]. ,D.K.S. Bhavan, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District North Bastar, Kanker {Chhattisgarhj $ J " 3] / The Chief Executive 1A! \D? 93G“ ¢ 9“» Panchayat, Durgukondal, Officer, Janpad District North Bastar, Kanker [Chhattisgarh] ' ;«-4] Boys Primary School, Durgukondal, Primary through~ its Head Mistress, Boys School, Durgukondal, Tahsil— Bhanupratappur, District Kanker fChhattisgarh] HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No. 686 of 2007 PETITHONER Amit Kumér Shrivastava VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Sourabh Sharma counsel for the petitioner. Shri Raghvendra Verma counsel for respondent No.3. WRIT PETHTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON3TITUTION OF INDIA O R D E R (03.07.2009) With the consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Chaiienge in the instant petition is to the order dated 14.12.2006 (Annexure P-2) passed by respondent No.3 whereby the petitioner was transferred from Boys Primary School, Durgukondal to Primary School Medho, Kanker, in violation of the transfer policy. This Court entertaining the grievance of the petitioner had granted stay in his favour vide order dated 6.2.2007. ln view of the fact that the petition was filed on 24.1 .2007 and the stay was also granted in favour of the petitioner, the transfer .. . order so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the State Government would be at liberty to pass an order if the administrative exigency so warrants. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge j