Single Bench WRIT PETITION Nog 7 é lf2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) / Sunil Kumar Shrivastava, aged about 46 years, son of Shri Mohanlal Shrivastava, Gram Sahayak, “Presently posted at Gram Panchayat Deewanpur, Janpad Panchayat — Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) PETITIONER' VERSUS RESPONDENTS i State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, ’ Department of Panghayat and Social Welfare Services, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Collector, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) The Collector, Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) The Joint Director, Village Panchayat and Social Welfare Services, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) / g . Chief Executive Off1cer, Janpad Panchayat Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22/OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, Xl-HC—78 W wmm ................................... m 200 s w P no méa) , meIW<W) mmm anéal anéamiwm > awméam mm#wm aimanéa 31 . 98. 2005 The petition was dismissed as withdrawn o 15.06.2(105, with liberty to file an appeal before the conc rned authority in accordance with law. Learned counsel for he petitioner submits that an appeal was sent to through pro er ehanne'l Le. it was sent'by Registered post. As indicat in the envelop annexed herewith at page 24, the envelop indicates first on 18.07.2005 that "lene se in r kiya" and thereafter on 21.07.2005 "absent”. was sent by any other method r not. as alleged by the petitioner hat the appellate authority declined to accept the appeal, f om the postal remark. ln view of earlier order ated. 15.06.2005 passed by this Court, this petition stands di missed. is as Mr. AN; Bhakta, learned counsel for the petitioner. . Government Advocate for Mr. Arun Sao, learned the State of £hhattisgarh. LANo. 7053 of 2005 This is an appiication far rgent hearing. The application stands di posed of. The petitioner has ied earlier writ petition W.P.No.2339 dated 31.12.1998 passed by Joint Di ector, Panchayat and Sociai Welfare Services, Biiaspur Div ion, Bilaspur. the order l of 2005 cha ienging lt is not clear as to whether appeal lt is further not clear, Sdl- Satish K. Agniimtri ‘ Judge e