(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 445 OF 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri M. B. D’Costa, Senior Advocate with Shri J. A. Lobo, advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. P. Lawande, advocate respondent no.1. Shri S. D. Padiyar, advocate for respondent no.2. Shri Sudin Usgaokar, advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. Shri J. P. Mulgaokar, advocate for respondent no.5. CORAM : SMT. N. N. MHATRE & P. V. HARDAS, JJ. DATE : 5th January, 2004. P. C. The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that the occupancy certificates are being granted by respondents no.2 to respondent nos. 3 and 4 without following the rules as applicable. A compliance report was called for by the Court which indicates that the revised plans approved by the South Goa Planning and Development - 2 - Authority, have been approved by the Margao Municipal Council. Respondent no.5 is still examining the sewerage, drainage, development of road widening area, etc. Learned counsel for respondent no.5 states that this aspect will be considered within a period of six weeks from today. Once this formality is completed, respondent no.2 shall issue occupancy certificate in accordance with the law and rules applicable. Petition disposed of. SMT. N. N. MHATRE, J. P. V. HARDAS, J. mc.