1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 383 OF 2010 (Vilas Dharmaji Nerkar vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 13, 2010. Heard Shri Khamborkar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sonare, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 4, Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 and Shri Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 6. The petitioner was not party to proceedings before the lower authorities and is rival in business. Shri Gupta and learned AGP have raised objection about maintainability of the petition. According to them, the petitioner has no locus and status and alleged unhealthy competition will not cloth him with any right. Shri Khamborkar, learned counsel states that the petitioner is having his licensed business just adjacent to the premises where Respondent No. 6 has started business. He, therefore, states that it adversely affects the license and business of the petitioner. The petitioner cannot challenge the order of the Hon'ble Minister in Revision on that ground. If he 2 has any legal ground, he is at liberty to agitate it before the Competent Court. Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.