IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4169 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 09, 2011. Guljeet Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Lakhwinder Singh Padda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was appointed as a Teacher in Computer Faculty on contract basis. The petitioner got married at a place which is stated to be about 50 kilometers away from the place of her posting. She allegedly due to back ache could not travel and resigned from the aforesaid service. Her resignation was accepted. The petitioner, after a break, made a representation to the respondent-authorities that she may be allowed to withdraw her resignation and finding no response, has served the respondent-authorities with a legal notice dated 25.11.2010 (Annexure P4). During the course of hearing learned counsel for the petitioner though could not point out any provision in terms whereof the respondent- C.W.P.No .4169 of 2011 2 authorities could review their decision of accepting the petitioner's resignation and/or to allow her to resume her duties, nevertheless, if there is any such provision, let the claim of the petitioner be considered in accordance with such rules/policy decision. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the above mentioned claim of the petitioner which also finds mentioned in the legal notice dated 25.11.2010 (Annexure P-4) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 09, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE