In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.25474 of 2008 Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah Vrs. The State of Bihar **** /2/ 17.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the husband of the complainant, Rinku Devi. He is not named as accused in the complaint petition. There is no allegation against him in the complaint petition even then cognizance has been taken against him as he is husband of the complainant. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Sah, is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of his surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 314 of 2006 (Tr. No. 3171 of 2008) to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )