THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 13968 of 1997 Oral order: The petitioner is seeking the relief of absorption in respondent No. 3-DRDA. The respondents ﬁled counter inter alia stating that even before this Court passed the interim order, the petitioner was relieved on 30.06.1997. It is stated that the writ petitions ﬁled by similarly placed employees in W.P. Nos. 23865 and 14010 of 1997, were dismissed by this Court. Apart from the averments in the counter, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that respondent No.3-DRDA itself has been closed. Since respondent No.3-DRDA itself has been closed, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 31.01.2007 KSR