IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 267 of 2008(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36399/2007 Dated 10/12/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------ M/S. EMSONS TREAT WOOD LTD., NALAM MILE, ERUMATHALA, ALUVA-683 105, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M.J.PAULOSE. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- 1. THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE FOR SALES TAX EXEMPTION (L & M), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.TEK CHAND THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P.No.267 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 36399 OF 2007 G ==================== Dated this the 27th day of March, 2008 O R D E R The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of delay, since Ext.P6 that was sought to be challenged was of 14/6/06. However, this review petition is filed on the ground that it was only under cover of Annex.A that Ext.P6 was conveyed to the petitioner. Even accepting the argument to be true, Annexure A is dated 22/1/2007 and the writ petition was filed only on 7/12/2007. Thus even accepting the case of the review petitioner, the writ petition can be seen to be belated. I do not find any circumstance warranting review of the judgment. Review petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp