IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12865 of 2001 AMRENDRA NARAYAN SINGH Versus BIHAR STATE CO-OPERATIVE LAND DEVP.BANK & ORS. ----------- 5. 24.09.2008 In this writ application, learned counsel also urged inapplicability of Rule 74 (b) (ii) of the Bihar Service Code, an aspect which has already been discussed in the order passed today in CWJC No. 3646 of 2000 and negated. It is additionally urged that the counter affidavit states that the service of the petitioner “was not found satisfactory”. Therefore, the order of compulsory retirement was a punishment. This Court finds it difficult to accept the submission that the words cast stigma. No other ground has been urged to demonstrate that the order of compulsory retirement was merely a camouflage for otherwise what was punitive. There is no merit in the writ application. It is likewise dismissed. If there be any arrear for salary or pension despite the impugned order, quite naturally the Respondent-Bank is required to consider that aspect of the matter and pass appropriate order thereupon in accordance with law and pay legitimate dues of the petitioner within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)