ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1427 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1427 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.1427 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2007 Ganpat Attamaram Dhaygude ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Mr.Rahul S.Kadam for the Applicant. Ms.U.V.Kejariwal, APP for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL : BILAL : BILAL NAZKI & NAZKI & NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 27TH JANUARY, 2009. : 27TH JANUARY, 2009. : 27TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The Applicant is suffering for life imprisonment and has been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. His earlier bail application was rejected by an order dated 5th March, 2008. There is no change of circumstances from 5th March, 2008 till date. However, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that accused No.6 was granted bail on 17th October, 2008 by this Court, therefore, there is a change of circumstances. 2. We do not find ourselves persuaded, after going through the record, that there is a case for bail of the ( 2 ) present Applicant. The Applicant as well as the other accused were on bail even during the trial. They were facing the trial under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the the IPC and have a life imprisonment. The Applicant has not been in jail for more than even a year. 3. As such, the Criminal Application is rejected. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL (BILAL (BILAL NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.) NAZKI, J.)