1 caw-52.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 52 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7653 OF 2010 Tabassum Juber Patel & another. ... Applicant. V/s. Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation and another. ... Respondents. A.C.Singh i/b. D.R.Shah for the applicant. N.R.Bubna for respondent No.1. A.V.Anturkar i/b. R.D.Suryawanshi for respondent No.2. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 11th January 2011. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. Perused civil application. 2. It is brought to our notice that two stop work notices dated 22nd December, 2009 and 8th October, 2010 were issued. It is also brought to our notice that after issuance of such notices much water has flown and the Corporation had an occasion to go into the various questions raised by the petitioner and pass appropriate 2 caw-52.11 orders in that behalf. However, the fact remains that none of these stop work notices as yet has been withdrawn by the Corporation. 3. Mr.Anturkar submits that in view of pendency of the petition, the Corporation thought it fit not to pass any order. 4. Be that as it may, we hereby make it clear that pendency of this petition shall not come in the way of the Corporation, if the Corporation desires to pass appropriate order withdrawing stop work notices. The Corporation is expected to pass appropriate order within one week from the date of communication of this order. 5. Mr.Anturkar makes a statement that till the Corporation passes an appropriate order, respondent No.2 shall not undertake any further construction activity. In this view of the matter, no further orders are necessary on this civil application. 6. Mr.Bubna undertakes to communicate this order to the Corporation. At the same time other parties are also directed to inform this order to the Corporation. 7. Civil application is disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)