IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30249 of 2011(E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) : ---------------------- LESLIE PHILIP, M/S.LESLIE CONTROLS, AC ROAD, PERUNNA, CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.MANSOOR B.H. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. ING VYSYA BANK LTD., THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY BRANCH MANAGER, ING VYSYA BANK LTD., THIRUVALLA-689 101. 2. GENERAL MOTORS TECHNICAL CENTER INDIA PRIVATE LTD., 3RD FLOOR, CREATOR BUILDINGS, INTERNATIONAL TECH PARK, WHITE FIELD ROAD, BANGLORE-560 066. R1 BY ADV. SRI. R.S. KALKURA, S.C., BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING : NS W.P.C. NO.30249/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23/2/2009. P2 : COPY OF THE NEW AGREEMENT FOR WHOLESALE PARTS DISTRIBUTOR SUPPLY AGREEMENT. P3 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20/1/2010 SENT BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P4 : COPY OF THE BANK GUARANTEE DATED 24/5/2011 FROM ING VYSYA BANK PVT LTD., THIRUVALLA ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25/5/2011 SENT BY PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT. P6 : COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 21/10/2011 AND REPLY. P7 : COPY OF THE EMAIL DATED 29/10/2011. P8 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22/10/2011 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. P9 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29/10/2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P10 : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7/11/2011 SENT BY PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE NS. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30249 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T What is sought in this writ petition is to direct the respondent, Bank from invoking the Bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner. First of all, the respondent is only a scheduled Bank which is not at all amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this court. If at all the petitioner has any grievance, it is a matter which is to be adjudicated before a civil court. Therefore I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition and it is dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge