IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2010 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35865 of 2010(G) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- C.RAVEENDRAN, S/O.CHATHUKUTTY, AGED 60 YEARS, KALATHINGAL PARAMB, NADUVATTOM, P.O.NORTH BEYPORE, KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SMT.K.A.ANGEL TREENA SMT.ARLISS TRENCY ANTONY RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, PALAYAM BRANCH, KOZHIKODE-638 052. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.ANJU P.NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 35865 of 2010 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner had mortgaged a property for availing of loan from the respondent Bank. Default was committed, as a result of which, the Bank filed a suit and obtained decree. In the execution proceedings, the mortgaged property was sold and the Bank itself purchased the same. Now, by making Ext.P3 representation, petitioner seeks re-conveyance of the property. 2. Although the learned Standing Counsel for the Bank disputed the claim of the petitioner and contended that the petitioner does not have any right to claim re- conveyance of the property, having regard to the fact that Ext.P3 representation is still not answered, I dispose of the writ petition, directing that the respondent will consider th representation and pass appropriate orders thereon and communicate the same to the petitioner. This shall be done, W.P.(C) No.35865/10 : 2 : as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge