•Y c -gr- t eyv^ INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (<3) N03 F 2009 PETITIONER ^.^ ^.^•rA^' ^ Anil Kumar Kori, aged about 39 years, S/o Shri B.V. Kori posted as Assistant Grade II, Water Resources, Sub Division No.2, Baikunthpur Distt Korea (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Water Resources Department Mantralaya, D K S Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) syf"~ 2. Under Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Mantralaya, D K S Bhawan, g?~ Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Sub Division Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE^F WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION^R DIRECTIONS.ORDEROR ORDERS: -78 ?6^ T5T ^l*lld'4, (?Ti1y'i(o, (SK'ii'Ml< i^r^^-^^-^-^^k^^ sn^?r •q'w C^s^V) ^tt11<'1*li'^ *11*1^11 N ISI<1 <l'II<'5t<. iKaifTOOT^i 9^1 W W wn sn^i »iim ^TOT^tel3II^B HOS'BLS SHRI JUSTICE 16.0-7.2009 Shri Ashish Shrivastava ^j,,.., h: "•iai^:"'-^ '4 ;.-f ^^ ^. .^ •!,P!',.t})e,. petitioner, SrinSrwnd Dubey, P.L. .-.'..'lChagghRe in the oresl •36.06:260§'<iknnexureP/i] va: with Shri Akhilesh Daipati, counsel br the State. ent petition is to the order clated ^sed by respondent Nb. i by which the petitioner who is working as Atsistant Grade II has been transferred fronrs'Aan.office of Sub Diw^ional Officer, Water Resources Sub Division No.2, Bai.kunthpur i|o Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Kachhar, bilaspur. • ' Contention of counsel fct" the Detitioner is that the wife of the oetitioner is working as In chailee Headmistress at Govt. Gsris Higher Secondary School, Manendrage|rh, District Koriya and on account of the impugned transfer order, bi^ family' would be disturbed. CounseFfor the State cobtends that let the petitioner make a representation to the responderf: No. 1 and the same would be decideci m accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioneit agrees to make a representation an.d submits that a direction may b^ issued to the authority concerned to decide his reoresentation exoeditiously in accordance with law. Accordingiy, the petition ]is disposed of vi'ith a direction to ' the petitioner to ma2<e a representation within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the copj' of this order, the same would be decided within a period of three 'tveeks from the date of its receipt. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^