(CP 50 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2011 Suresh Vithal Jadhav ...Petitioner Vs. Smt. Jankibai Babugir Gosavi since deceased through her legal heirs and representatives Chabubai Ramkirshna Gosavi and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.A.P. Kulkarni for Petitioner Mr.P.G. Sarda for Respondent Nos.2,6,9,11 and 12 Mr.Rahul Kulkarni for Respondent No.10 Ms. Rajalakshmy Mahandas i/b. ALMT Legal for Respondent Nos. 13 to 19 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 9th February, 2011 P.C. 1. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the order passed by the Trial Court under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not been complied by the Respondents. It is an admitted position that the Petitioner has filed an application in the Trial Court under Order 39 Rule 2(A) of the CPC and the same is pending which is numbered as Exhibit -76 in the Trial Court. His grievance is that more than five months (CP 50 of 2011 have passed, yet the Trial Court has not heard and disposed of the said application and, therefore, he was constrained to file the contempt petition in this Court. 2. In my view, it would be appropriate if the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune is directed to dispose of the application filed by the Petitioner under the said provision as Exhibit -76 as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within a period of four weeks from today. 3. Contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Liberty, however, is granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court in the event, the said application is not disposed of within four weeks. (V.M. KANADE J.)