IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2011 / 6TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20616 of 2011(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHEENA ABRAHAM, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (UPSA), A.U.P.S. VAZHIKKADAVU, VAZHIKKADAVU P.O., MALAPPURAM – 679 333. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM - 679 001. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NILAMBUR – 679 329, MALAPPURAM DIST., R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. V. VIJULAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.20616/2011-B: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL APPOINTMENT ORDER DTD. 17/06/2002. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 02/06/2004. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE GENERAL ORDER. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PART OF THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE SERVICE BOOK OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 13/05/2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 20616 of 2011-B - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is seeking for a direction to the Government to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 representation within a time frame. 2. The prayer made in Ext.P6 is to grant approval of appointment from 2.6.2004 to 31.1.2006. The approval of appointment of the petitioner granted by the Government as per Ext.P3 is only with effect from 1.2.2006. The petitioner was appointed for different periods previously, from 18.6.2001 to 31.3.2004. According to the petitioner, she became a Rule 51A claimant, as the appointments on two different spells were approved. It is also pointed out that there was no protected teacher to fill up any vacancy. 2. It is upto the Government to take a decision on Ext.P6. Therefore, there will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Ext.P6 representation after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that I have not expressed anything on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. The petitioner wpc 20616/2011 2 will forward a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the Government for compliance. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/