IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.N0f%&7— / 2004 Pin ettioer /’I,(u.Sarita Nirmal D/o Late Ratan Respondents Singh Nirmal, Aged about 22 Years, R/o — Chhote Attarmuda, Near Zila Panchayat Bhawan, Distt. e Raigarh Q (C.G.) We Versus e e LL ‘ m LC dated §i,(i‘.m) 1. ‘{ Union of India Through its Secretaxy State Reorganization Cell, Khan Market, New Delhi. State of Chhattisgarh Through it’s Secretary, Department Of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur—{C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through it’s Secretary Department Of Forest, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal — (M.P.) Chief Conservator of Forest Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. District Forest Officer Production Division, Raigarh—(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER CONSTITUTION ARTICLE OF 226/ INDIA 227 OF THE H ‘ ./' / v/fé/ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI $AT!SH K. AGNIHGTRI, J. Respondents : Union of India 85 Othsrs. WRIT PETET10N HO. 4887 OF 2004 Ku. Sarita Nirmal Petitioner ‘ V€I‘SUS l_. QRAL ORDER (27th June, 2006) The father of the petitioner namely Shri Ratau Singh Nimal died While working as Forester at Produch'on Division of the Raigarh Forest Department at Raigarh in harness on 9.3.2000. Thereafter, the petitioner has made an applicau'on for compassionate appoin‘mlent, which according to the petitioner was rejected, The Government of Chhattiegarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, has directed all the departments to consider cases of all the eligible dependant-legal heir of the deceasedg‘employees, who died in harness between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for compassionate appointment. Accordingly, the Government of Chliattisgarh is directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per its own circular dated 2.2.2006/and also in View of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.3879/ 2004 and other connected matters on its f t \‘ Present : Shri Vinay Pandey, counsel for the, petitioner. Shri SK. Beriwal, counsel for the respondent No. l. Shri LN. Smivastava, Panel lawyer for the State. I own merit, in accordance with law, within a pelicd of eight weeks, on such mpresentation being filed by the petitioner, 5, For the reasons stated above, the writ petition Stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sau'sh K. Agm‘hou-i Judge I