IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14125 of 2009(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.M.HUSSAIN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.PAREETH,MUHAMMED ALI,KARUMAKATTE HOUSE, KUMARAPURAM.PO,PALLIKKARA,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,ERNAKULAM DIST. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(R/R),KUTTANADU TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE,KUTTANADU TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIAL BOARD,REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. 6. THE SECRETARY,KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIAL BOARD,VANCHIYUR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. THE PROJECT OFFICER,DISTRICT KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIAL OFFICE,ERNAKULAM. R5, R6 BY ADV.SRI.K.P.HARISH, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.14125 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner availed a loan from the 5th respondent. He has repaid it following certain earlier litigations. Certain deposits were made under protest. As of now, the 5th respondent has returned the documents offered to create security interest. Therefore, it is clear that the loan has been repaid. The only surviving contention is regarding the request of the petitioner for refund of certain amounts paid towards collection charges. That is a matter pending finalisation before the 6th respondent in the form of Exts.P4 and P5. Learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 states that Exts.P4 and P5 would be taken up, considered and disposed of in accordance with law, at the earliest. Recording this submission, it is directed that Exts.P4 and P5 shall be decided upon after hearing the petitioner and action taken in terms of such decision within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.25/5.