CWP No.1117 of 2008 18.7.2008 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for Respondents 1 to 3. This petition can be disposed of at this stage itself without calling for a reply from the respondents. The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication annexure P-6 dated 19th May, 2008. The petitioner had previously also approached this Court by filing CWP No.677 of 2008. At that time he had not even supplied the copy of the order. This Court vide order dated 5th May, 2008 disposed of the writ petition by directing the State Government to supply the copy of the order decreasing the fares, to the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner was to approach the appropriate forum. According to Shri Neel Kamal Sood, the petitioner filed Revision Petition under Section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act before the learned State Transport Appellate Tribunal and this petition is still pending. It is obvious that the petitioner is suffering due to the operation of the impugned order. Whether the order is to be set-aside or not is a matter for the learned Tribunal to decide on merits. However, the interest of justice demands that the revision petition filed by the petitioner before the learned Tribunal is disposed of at the earliest. Therefore, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the learned State Transport Appellate Tribunal to dispose of the revision petition latest by 18th August, 2008. Dasti copy. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. July 18, 2008 ( V.K.Ahuja ), J. ™