1 CP 323-09 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.323 OF 2009 Vasant Sawalaram Chila ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents & ors Mr.Kamlakar Koli, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP, for Respondent No.3 Mr.Vijay Patil, Advocate, for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 30TH JULY, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. On 15th April, 2010, this Court had already observed that Contempt Petition is not tenable. Since the learned Counsel for the Petitioner took time, it was adjourned to 10th June, 2010. Again on 10th June, 2010, it was pointed out that the Commissioner whose order is alleged to be disobeyed is not a Court sub- 2 CP 323-09 ordinate to this Court. Therefore, there is no question of contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 about disobedience of order of such Commissioner. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner still refers to Section 62 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. This has already been discussed in the order dated 10th June, 2010. The matter was adjourned only to enable the learned AGP to clarify as to how the person concerned describes himself as Nyayadhish. 3. Contempt Petition is misconceived. It is, therefore, dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)