IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2009 / 15TH PHALGUNA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1095 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN COC.237/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER:- --------------------------- DR.KUNHAMMA GEORGE, W/O GEORGE, AGED 61 YEARS,PROFESSOR IN MEDICINE, ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES HOSPITAL, PARIYARAM,KANNUR DISTRICT, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.28/3083, TAGORE NAGAR, PONNIATH CROSS ROAD, KADAVANTHARA,COCHIN 20 BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DR.K.BHASKARAN, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR, ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, PARIYARAM, KANNUR- 670 502. 2. SHRI K.KARUNAKARAN ,AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL COMPLEX AND ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, PARIYARAM, KANNUR 670 502. BY P V SURENDRANATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... CONT.CASE(C) NO. 1095 OF 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2009 JUDGMENT Even as a preface, it needs to be noticed that this matter has to end. 2. The petitioner was working as Associate Professor in Medicine in a substantive post in the State of Manipur. From that government service, she joined the Academy of Medical Sciences, Pariyaram on deputation basis. Later following different events, this court issued Annexure A judgment, holding that the petitioner stood absorbed with effect from 15.11.1999. That writ petition was allowed directing that all consequential benefits shall follow. With the passage of time, issues arose as to whether the total outstandings were paid or not and still as to what would be the total outstandings. 2. On a discussion with the learned counsel appearing on either side, it was thought fit that the parties should have a peaceful end to this litigation. It was noted that the petitioner had been working in some other establishments at least for COC 1095/2008 2 some period. Taking into consideration the entire amounts, that would have been due, it is ordered that if the petitioner is paid an amount of Rs.7,50,000/-, which is less than one third of the total amounts, the matter should be left to rest. In the result, this case will stand closed on the respondents paying an amount of Rs.7,50,000/- to the petitioner within two months from now. Cont.Case ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/9/3