IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6349 of 2010 KHALO MUKHIYA @ KHALO NISHAD @ KHALU MUKHIYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 10.05.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 302 IPC. Learned counsel, referring to the F.I.R., states that petitioner, at best, can be said to be order giver. It is next contended that other accused persons, who were constituting members of the group involved in killing of the victim, has/have since been granted bail by this Court(Annexure-3). It is next contended that he is in custody since 26.7.2009. Learned A.P.P. does not dispute this position. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Barh, in connection with Maranchi P.S. case no. 36 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailers will be own/close family member of the petitioner (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions without any 2 cogent/satisfactory reason, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and thereafter the Trial Court will be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )