.^' .-»'' ^" liatti IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. ...^.(L....2002 PETITIONER .'•&•- ••<*•°< »•• y- -•^•^s^^".- ^O. •••",c,W-^'Q7^-'' f^-^AVi'3^^"" ^^t"i..--[v" As.^ RESPONDENTS: Prabhat Kuinar Khalkho S/o Preiu Chandran Khalkho Aged about 32 years. R/o Village Katni, Post Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS x State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Adim Jati, Anusuchit Jati, Pichhada Warj and Alpsankhayak Deptt. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Coniinissioner, Adiin Jati, Anusuchit Jati, Pichhada Warg and Alpsankhayak Deptt. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Block Education officer Sitapur. Distt. Surguja. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •,•'''i iBIF'ffl' laKiiMilaiBiiNaaiiiUBBB XI-HC-22 '3^:"<ll'ctl<ai,.sAi*re^{« i iy, HWCTI StlWI'h^^^,,.^^ I., :M^3BSSTfla! l:R^i?b <wi^%i ^*ti<*> rw e-- ^\^Q &^tI^T ^^<t 22.01.2003 Shri M.V.Paranjape, Gounsel Shri Raii.bu-Sm.gh, G.A, for Though this ;iaatter is Ustei adinission, oa the prayer of leam' wifh fhe consent of State couasel, tlle admiission stage. The challenge iu fhis writ ^j dated 21.11.2002 whereby the at GoveramLent Boys Higher transferred iu fhe saine capacilyj diseloses the CoIleGtor, Daatewadal [for ftLepetitioner. tb.e State. . To begin. \vith, it inay be sta servicc aad pcrson who .holds a his transfer. tt is within fhe defemune as to where a partiGul£( b^ pQstect. However, there iiiay laay be examiaed by fhe Court .cases wllgre aa eittployee has beUii ^<-fo^t 'RP^f ^ f^^ tf^'^.K .^? 3^F3IT'SB^T jl .for hearing on fhe question of |d couiisel for the petitiQner and [fhe inatter is beiag disposed of at stition is to fhe order of transfer pet{donerwho was working as U.D.T; Seccjadaiy School, Sitapur has been itd" Dantewada aad as fhe order is to give him a suitable posting. •d fhat trarisfer is aa uicidence of IJTaiisferable post catinot object to jurisdiction of fhe einployer to r einployce should or shoiild not be soine eases of traasfer 'whicli fsd these would nonaaHy be fhe subjecfed to frequent transfG|FS 1»! l:!:|3fil§Bel-2E: SiI^W^T I^^Rota^ft . ^Jlfl<!t^^f^<f 1^, il,iii!.ilrr-lllTO wS?s t-MwsKs -*-- or the transfer is by way of particular person by bringiag hixil| person was tiausferred aad scnf^ui joined tfaat particular place of Interference ihay be justified iu any proposed nonns or principlei uiiaffected aad no detruiient is hbrassment or to accominodate a back to the place froia where fb.at out the •TiLcuin.bent wlio had tr^risfer of the previous incuinbent. lases of niala fide or iD&action of transfer ought aot to be entertaiiij of teansfer, ia fhe opinion of tfae] above baGkground. The case oftiie petitioner ls| servant einployed as an Degree College, Sitapur' withia petitioner was also posted. It ij Sitapur, on two occasions ttie ^ called Bhusu fi-oni where he thereafter the impugned order ha It is tUe sublnissidn ofthc in fact, hasbecn passcdduriiig'l iil-session itwill disturb the ,^f '^T^^F^TR^IJ^1^5 tf<4'^^ ^'sf^nsH^ff Where career prospects rsinaui ;aused, chatlenge to an order of ;d. Thusthe chaIlen.Ke t6 an order Court, is to be corisidered ia the that his wife is also a Govenunent AssisNnt Professor ia fhe Govenliuent Ijhe district of Siirguja where thei ^ stafed; fhat aiter his postiug at ;titioner was attached to a place ^tas shifited tlack at iSitapur and ^beeapassed. . . '^] •'.\ •[ aetitjoiicr that fhe unpugned'order,' st|ic t)aH Reiiodaiidsijice it is in fhej ,1;,] stttdies ofhischildreii.^ItKasseiitiectl •iWil B81 N' r ini XI-HC-22, 3-0:i -i)i •iM-q; ywsife, sii^'^r R-ii.+'sii^g <»^-F ^(I-^ that fhe order is also ?liable~to be lietng a Governnieat servaat, bot4 are to be posted, as far as INi :1 SB^T ^Riiwafi'g -3- ^ossible, at ttic saiiie'place. Agaul! ^ubniitted aaepFeseiLtati&a. ; In thc abovc view of fhe in, ^dvised, fhe petitioner laay subnu.1 1-espondent N6.2 poiatiag out his g| jSles such a representatipn by 318t fl ^e considered-aad dispQsed ofon ilj t'the tran^Ter fhe petitioiier has |tter, fb/e Court feels fhat if so a fi-esh representation to the yevanee. In case the petitioner IfJailuary 2003,1 fh®same shaU own nients, witlun a penod ,of, |two weeks fi~oiii receipt thiei^of. Wfaile considering fhe] ^presentation, fhe Aufh.orily sliall ^uideliiies issued by Ihe State Govi posting of both husjaalld aad wife^^ same place ifboth;fhe husbaad an^ Fhe Gkwenuneirt^iaay also consi)ler ftie postmg of bcrth, the aetitioiier aad Iiis wife, at aiiy place In fhe uitermi,;itisdirect^(| ahready been relieyed., ,the AuthorHy| c»nt)'i<i')-)'*ifflaT%}^Ezt<fa^li : .^<yPd*l siTiw- ict aside because Iu& wijfe also blsQitaike mto dQnsideratioir tiae ;n±mentregarding transfei' aact; 1 s4araspossibIe,isa§Ejaieatthe| wife'are ia Govemiaentservice. luifhe State.- the decision is taken oa tu%isprcse]^tatiOQ. ^ ffiatfif tlie petitiQDcr ^has no|tr /•''••. •. •' ' '•'•'•. ' • '''• ':'••'••' ••" ';":''' /[ '.. inay .pcnnit hiTn to eontiirue tiH -l!a: ^? •m :if- '!.t ;;11 XI-HC-22 'S'SI •^WIWf^ffSs'WtfKffKtKiyf. w*WCTgi*((«ii ^'f-.^^g^^]^ sti^rqii fa-li'h SD^t ^lflw1B^ ^plpiw* -<=?—~ slAttAWWSfeT -M- Witb the above observatjon^ disposed of. Gonsequentty, I.A.l^o.8494/2002 for urgent hearing also staads disposed of. Certified copy as pcr rulcs. Q ^ ^ ., Judge 'bKfcl'S't HNWffIS'A <&tt(l< ^•3ff<R3n^8 aad directions, the petitioner is