mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.482 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.588 OF 2008 Jibhau Vittal Bagul Applicant versus Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. and another Respondents Ajay Varma i/by H.E.Palwe for applicant. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th April 2009 PC : 1. Heard advocate for the applicant. The authorised representative of the first respondent is present. In view of the settlement between the parties he has no objection for condonation of delay. Accordingly the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. (A.S.OKA, J.) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.588 OF 2008 Jibhau Vittal Bagul Applicant versus Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. and another Respondents Ajay Varma i/by H.E.Palwe for applicant. S.S.Pednekar, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 13th April 2009 PC : 1. Learned advocate for the applicant has placed on record the consent terms duly signed by the applicant and one Dinesh B. Patil, Chief Accountant of the first respondent. A true copy of resolution conferring the authority in favour of the said Dinesh B. Patil is annexed to the consent terms. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant has tendered an affidavit of said Dinesh B. Patil. He stated that on instructions of the applicant he identifies Mr.Dinesh B. Patil. In the said affidavit it is stated that he has been authorised to record settlement as per the terms and conditions incorporated in the ((-3-)) settlement. 2. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The affidavit is taken on record and marked "Y" for identification. 3. In view of the consent terms, the impugned judgements and orders are quashed and set aside and the applicant is acquitted of the offences alleged against him. Criminal Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (A.S.OKA, J.)