pvr 1 A226-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.226 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3726 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2655 OF 2009 Ms.Kusum @ Krishna Rajesh Kothari. ...Appellant vs. 1.Mukesh @ Praveen Vasantkumar Chandan & Ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.D.H.Mehta with Mr.M.S.Bhandari i/b. Mr.Pranjali Bhandari,for Appellant. Mr.Ramchandran N. with Rohan Cama & Chirag D. i/b. Narayanan & Narayanan, for Respondent 1. Respondent no.2 in person present. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED: 18th July,2011. P.C.:- 1. In an administrative suit, the Court has made an interim order protecting the interest of pvr 2 A226-11 all co-sharers. The learned Counsel appearing for appellant submits that some flats are lying vacant in the Wadia property and therefore, Receiver should have been appointed on those flats. Perusal of the additional affidavit shows that the allegations made in that regard are absolutely vague. The appellant may be a co- sharer in the property. Therefore, he should have sought inspection of the property and after inspection of the property he should have filed affidavit making specific averments in that regard in the affidavit. In the absence of any specific averments being made, the learned Single Judge has rightly dealt with that aspect of the matter. There is no substance in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) ---