75 ^ ^75^) Division B»ne^ THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A3l J3ILASPUR WRIT APPEAL N0. HZ | QF 2011 APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS 1. Gu.ru Ghasidas University Bilaspur throi^gh F?c;g:istrar, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) -^' ^' 2. Examination CGJ'I troller, Guru Ghasidas. University Bilaspur (Clihatfcisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ PBTITIONERS if v),^ .y .\^ Ly>^/^ A^x^ W:A^ /y/^' ^ ^"^•"...- ^".c/-y 5. 6. ^ 7. Lata Yadav, D/o Late Balrarn Yadav , aged about :1.9 years Years, student of B.A Part-I R/o R K Nagar,Bilaspur (CG) Chitralekha Mannewar, D/o Chhattulal MannewoU', aged about 19 years, student of B.A Part-I, R/o Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) Hemlata Dewaiigan, D/o Shri Hetram Dewangcin,aged about 19years, student of B. A. Part-I, R/o Dabripara, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur '(CG) Rukmini Yadav , D/o Shri Mohanlal Yaclav, agecl about 19 yrs, student of B.A.Part-I R/o Ram Nagar, ^Lingiyadih Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) Koushilya Patel, D/o Shri Pawan Patel, aged about, 19 yrs, student of El.A.Part-I R/o Bharat Chowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspur (CG) Nisha Kashyap, D/o Shri Vishnu Kashyap, agecl. about 19 yrs, student of B.A.Part-I R/o Chingrajpara, Eiilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) Padmini Chandraka r, D / o Ramchandra Chartdrakar, aged about 19 years, stuclent ofBAPart-I, R/o Sliyam Nagar Lingiyadih, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) ^ '? ..4tr;''~:"^ /<?/ ^^^^ ^ i 8. Mamta Sahu, D/o Dlzanuram Sahu, aged about '19 years, student of B.A. Part-l, R/o Ram-ayan Chowk, Chir:i|2;rajpara Bilaspur, Dist. Bilasi>ur (CG) 9. Ragini Dewangan, D/o Shri Vijay Dewangan, aged about 19 yrs, student of B.A Part-I, R/o Amariya Chowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspur (CG) 10. Shakuntala Mathur, D/oShri Jitendra Mathur, agecl about 19 yrs, student of" BA Part-I, R/o Chingrajpara, Eiilaspur Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 11. Pratibha Yadav, D/o Shri VijayYadav, aged about 19 years, student of B.A» Part-I, R/o Ganesh Chowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspur (CG) 12. Anamika Soi'ii, D/o Shri Ashok Kumar Soi-ii, aged about 20 years, student of B.A Part-II, R/o Kapi] Nagar, Sarkanda, Biiaspur (CG) 13. Jyoti Thakur, D/o Shivkumar Thakur, aged about 20 years, Student of B.A Part-II, R/o Bandhwapara, Eiilaspur (CG) 14. Kavita Patel, D/o Chanclrabhan Patel, aged about 20 years, Student of B.A Part-II, R/o Ramganj Nagar, Bilaspur (CG) 15. Kavita Patel, D/o Kedarnath Patel, aged about 20 years, Student of B.A Part II, R/o Khamtarai, Bilaspiir (CG) 16. Vimla Patel, D/o Sohanlal Patel, aged about 20 years, Student of B.A Part II, R/o R.K. Nagar, Bilaspu.r (CG) 17. Shubhra Dhurve, D/o Shri R. N. Dhurve, aged about 20 years, student of B,A Part-II, R/o Ramagreen City Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) .y^ INNB^ ./^^^ /.^? l^ Je;^,l^ -A0l^tn7^/ ^ ^-^L-L^/ '^mc^/ 1 18. Savita Sahu, D/o R. 1C. Sahu aged about 20 yea.rs, student ofB.A Part-II, R/o Devnandan Nagar, Bilaspur, Dist Bilaspur 19. Rashmi Thakur, D/o Shri Dharmendra Thakur, aged about 20 years, stuclent of B. A. ParMI. R/o Malhar, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 20. Amarjyoti Jaiswal, D/o Shri Roshanlal Jaiswal.aged about 20 years, student of E5.A Part- II, R/o Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Disfc, Bilaspur (CG) 21. Shatrupa Kashyap, D/o Shri Vishnu Kashyap, agecl about 20 years, student of B.A, Part- II, R/o Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur, Disfc. Bilaspur (CG) 22. Versha Sahu, D/o Shri R.S. Sahu, aged about 20 years, Studenf of B.A Part-II, R/o Jagdamba Colony,EyiEiypur(CG) 23. Sunita Yadav, D/o Shri Dev Prasad Yadav, aged cibout 2 1 years, student of E}.7\Part-III, R/o Kapil Nagar, Scirkanda Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 24. Jyoti Pa.ndey, D/o F'rabhat Pandey, aged about 21 years, student of B.A Part- IH, R/o Khaira Bada, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 25. Bhuneshwari Prajapati, D/o Devi Prasad Prajapati, aged about 21 years, student of B.A Part-III, R/o Oppt. SECL, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 26. Santoshi Dhuri, D/o Late Shri Jeevan Lal Dhuri, aged about 21 years, stuclent of B.A Part-III, R/o R. K. Nagar, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 27. Kiran Yadav, D/o Shri Baghan Yadav.aged about 21 years, student ofB.A Part-III, R/o Bandhwapara, E?il.aspur @ ^ 28. Rashmi Patel, D/o Shri M. L. Patel, aged about 21 years, student ofE^.A Part-III, R/o Bandhwapara, Bilaspur 29. Rajeshwari Dhuri,D/o Shri Baharon Dhuri,aged about 21 years, studentofB.A F)art-III, R/o Vill.Pandhi,Bilaspur[CG] 30. Minakshi Tiwari, agecl about 21 years,D/o Shri Rajkumar Tiwari, student of B.A Part-III, R/o Chingrajpara, E?il<aspur 31. Ranjita Sidar, aged al)out 21 years, D/o Shri Shivhor Singh student of B.A Part.-Hl, R/o Kapil Nagar, Bilaspur[CG] 32. Amrit Nirmalkar, aged about 21 years,D/o Shri Gangaram Nirmalkar, student ofELA.Part- III, R/o Melapara, Chantidih Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (CG) 33. Santoshi Rajak, aged about 21 years, D/o Shn Lalram Rajak, student: ofB.A.Part-III, R/o Ratan Hotel, Bilaspur (CG) 34. Tara Patel, aged about 21 years, D/o Shri Chamar Singh Patel, student of"E3.A.Part-III, R/o Chilhad, Dist. Bilaspur 35. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Higher Educatioii Department, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyai:i Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chh.a<;tisgarh) 36. Shaskiya Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Though Principal, Seepat Road,Bilaspur (Chhat:tisgarh) 37. Smt. Sunanda Maravi, Assistant LecUirer (Hindi Subject) Shaskiya Mata Sabari Naveen Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (GG) WRIT APPEAL UNDBR SECTION 2 ifl 1_OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH ACT, 2006 READ WITH RULE 158_J1_0]LO|: CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT RULES, 2007. .A€FWQ^.. /y^-:^^ fe7 .^\°.^ I'.^i '^^y HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH^MLASPUR DB: HON*BLB I.M. QUDDUSI & HON*BLB G. MINHAJUDDIN, JJ, W.A.No.421/2011 Vs. RBSPONDENTS Lata Yadav aad others ItSWWIN^: l^ W.A.No.468/2011 Vs. W.A. No.449/2011 Vs. W.A.No.433/2011 Vs. WRIT APPEALS UNDER SECTION 2(11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPBAL TO DIVISIQN BBNCHI ACT. 2006 RBAD WITH RULE 158 110) OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH CQURT RULBS. 2007 APPELLANTS Gum Ghasidas Universityand anofher APPELLAS9TB Gum Ghasidas Universilyand aiiother RE8PONDBNT8 Renu Jaiswal and ofhiers APPBLLANTS Gum Ghasidas Universityaad aaother RESPONDBNTS Maya Dubey aad ofhers APPBLLANTS Guru Ghasidas Universityand another RESPONDBNTS Maaisha Gupta aad othera^ APPEARANCB: Mr. Ashish Shrivastava aiid Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, counsel for fhe appeUaats ia all fhe writ appeals. Mr. V.C. Ottalwar counsel for respondents 1 to 34 in W.A.421/2011, respondents 1 to 27 m W.A.468/2011, respondents 1 to 60 m W.A. 449/2011 and rcspondents 1 to 24 inW.A. 453/2011 Mr, Viaay Hadt, Deputy Advocate General for fhe State/ respondent no.35 ia W.A, 421/2011, respondent no,28 ia W.A.468/2011, respondent No.61 in W.A.449/2011 and respondent no.25 inW.A. 453/2011. Mr, P.S. Koshy, appears on behalf of Sunaada Maravi/ Respondent no.37 in W.A.421/2011, rcspondent no.30 in W.A.468/2011, Respondent no.63 in W.A.449/2011 & Respondent no.27 m W.A.453/1 1. Per I.M. OUDDUSI. J. ORALORDER (18.11.2011) 1. The above writ appeals have been filed agamst fhe common impugned order dated 08,08.2011 passed by fhe leamed Siagle Judge in W.P(C).Nos.l581, 1626, 1673 and 1580 of 2011 aUowiag the writ petitions, The learaed siagle Judge has held fhat the petitioners satisfied fhe basic requirements of attendaace; fhus tiiey shaU be treated as regular students for fhe examination wherein they had already appeared and fhe result of fhe said exainiaation shall be declared forthwith within a period ofone week fi-om today so fhat fhe petitioners could not be deprived ofadniission to furfher higher courses. 2. W.A. No.421/2011 rclates to W.P(C ).No.l581/2011 (Lata Yadav and others -vs- State); W.A.468/11 relates to W.P.(C ). 1626/11 (Renu Jaiswal and others -vs- State); W.A. 449/11 relates to W.P (C). 1673/2011 (Maya Dubey and others Vs. State) and W.A. 453/11 relates to W.P (C ). 1580/11 (Mamsh Oupta and others Vs. State). Siace fhese appeals iavolve smular facts and question of law, fhey are being disposed of by fhis coinnion order. 3. AppUcation has beeu filed ia each writ appeal on behalf of fhe respondent-stadents who were petitioners iii fhe writ petitions prayiag that the appeUaats/Universily herem.be directed to declare thej4? results of fheir respective courses ie,, B.A,, /B.Com., /B.C.A., (Part-I, Part-II aad Part-III) in the interest of justice, However, ia Paragraph 2 offhe application it has been prayed for a direction to the appeUaat University to declare ttie results of fhe respondent students tareatirtg fhein as private studeuts as fhey had appeared for fhe fiinal exaoiiaation of said courses held ia acadenuc session 2010-2011, 4. In view of tkie above, learaed counsel for the appeUants has submitted that fhe writ appeUants have no objectiou to declare the result of fhe respondents as private students. 5. Siace therc is no objection on tiie side of fhe writ appeUants, we dispose of all fhe four writ appeals with a direction fhat the results of the respondent-stadents shaU be declared treatiag fhenx as private students, 6« The ixnpugned order dated 08,08.2011 passed by the learaed siagle judge shall staad modi&ed to fhe above exte^t^ Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Rao ^