IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6612 of 2011 1. Hridya Narayan Singh S/o Late Tepan Singh 2. Jaonandan Singh S/o Late Sheo Sagar Singh 3. Krishna Nurarti Singh S/o Late Sudarshan Singh 4. Ramesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Muneshwar Sharma All R/o vill. Jamalpura, P.O. Korawan, P.S. Naubatpur, Dist. Patna ---Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna . 2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Bihar State Road Development Corporation LTD. Patna. 4. The Chief General Manager, Bihar State Road Development Corporation Ltd. Central Mechanical Workshop campus Near Patna Airport, Sheikpura, Patna-14. 5. The Deputy General Manager (Technical) Project Implementation unit, Bihar State Road Development Corporation Ltd. Camp office at Jaipal road, Off Bailey Road, Suraj Villa Apartment, Patna. 6. The Chief Engineer, State Highways Division, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 7. The Executive Engineer, State Highways Division, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 8. The District Magistrate, Patna. 9. The Land Acquisition Officers, Patna. 10. The District Forest Officer, Patna. 11. The Land Acquisition Deputy Collector, Patna Collectoriate, Patna. 12. M/s Ramky Infrastructure through its Chairman Hydrabad, Local office Jat Dumari, Near Parsa Bazar, P.S.Parsa, Dist. Patna. 13. Ashwini Kumar S/o not known to the petitioners, resident of vill. Gaura Jagdishpur, P.S. Naubatpur, Dist. Patna. ---Respondents. ----------- 03 10.05.2011 Both sides present. Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, learned counsel submits that the petitioners sought information under the Right to Information Act wherefrom it has appeared to the petitioners that orchards belonging to them are not going to be acquired. Learned Advocate General states that the respondents will see to it that orchards of the petitioners are not acquired or disturbed while taking steps for construction of State Highways. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitioners are, 2 however, agreeable to the acquisition of land other than orchard if so required by the respondents. In the light of the said information, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the application. Permission is accorded. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)