IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 17626-CII of 2011 in/and Civil Revision No. 1381 of 2011 Date of decision: November 14, 2011 Brij Bhan .. Petitioner Vs. Jaibir .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.K. Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.S. Kohli, Advocate for the applicant- respondent. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 10.1.2011 (Annexure P3) passed by the trial court. Having examined the impugned order, it transpires that the trial court not touch the core controversy and passed the order without application of mind. As a matter of fact, the court needed to have framed the appropriate issues which arises out of the pleadings of the parties before directing the parties to lead evidence over the same as the issues are the back bone of the case and apprise the parties of direction and scope of evidence to be led in the case. In the circumstances, the instant petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the trial court is directed to examine the pleadings on the next date fixed before it, and thereafter, frame all the appropriate issues afresh which arise out of the pleadings of the parties. November 14, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge