1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.8415 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 M.Senthilvel .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable and Endowment Department, Sivagangai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable and Endowment Department, Virudhunagar. 3.S.Muthuvel Pillai, 4.M.Sellaiah Pillai 5.K.Pitchai Muthu 6.P.Senthil 7.G.Mahilamboo Thevar .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the second respondent from enforcing the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.807/2011/A4, dated 06.07.2011 till the conclusion of revision pending on the file of the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Swaminathan For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Anandha Raj Govt. Advocate For R3 to R7 : Notice is dispensed with O R D E R ********** This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from enforcing the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.807/2011/A4, dated 06.07.2011 till the conclusion of revision pending on the file of the first respondent. 2. Heard Mr.G.R.Swaminathan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandha Raj, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for R-1 and R-2. 3. In view of the order which is going to be passed, notice is dispensed with for R-3 to R-7. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 5. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the first respondent is directed to take up the revision petition filed by the petitioner, dated 16.06.2011, for expeditious disposal. The first respondent may also consider the interim application said to have been filed by the petitioner for stay, so as to avoid any untoward incident consequent to the order of the second respondent. The stay petition shall be disposed of, within a period of fifteen days from today. If any third party will be affected by the nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner, or by any order to be passed, the authority shall hear such person to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its merits as per law. 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. pm Sd/- Assistant Registrar[Records] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable and Endowment Department, Sivagangai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable and Endowment Department, Virudhunagar. W.P.(MD)No.8415 of 2011 Dated:29.07.2011 2P/3C RPB 29.07.2011[I.T.] https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/