((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1478 OF 2007 V.Rama Rao Petitioner versus C.L.Meher & others Respondents Amol Patankar i/by V.K.Rode for petitioner. V.Y.Kejriwal for respondents 1 to 3. H.J.Dedhi, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd April 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for first to third respondents. My attention has been invited to order dated 29th November 2004 passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.387 of 1994. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has been filed on the basis of subsequent order passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai which is annexed to the petition. The said order of the High Court is passed in the petition for quashing under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the ((-2-)) present petitioner. By the said order the petition was dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to urge all the contentions before the Trial Court. The Roznama of the proceedings shows that the charge is not yet framed and the application for discharge made by the petitioner is pending. 2. In the circumstances, at this stage, this petition cannot be entertained. If the Trial Court passes an order which is adverse to the petitioner, the petitioner can always approach this Court by filing a fresh petition raising the same contentions which are raised in this petition. 3. Accordingly, subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. All contentions on merits are expressly kept open. The Trial Court will expeditiously dispose of the application for discharge. (A.S.OKA, J.)