HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER Applicaat Resposidest Non -Applicaiit Versus C. R.M.P. No.582/2009 Narbedeshwar Paadey, S/o Shri Moti Paadey, Aged about 65 years, R/o C-4, Priyadarshini Nagar, Bilaspur, P.S. Civit Liae, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. BUaspur (C.G.). D.P, Mishra, S/o Late A.K. Mishra, Aged about 64 years, R/o C-4, Priyadarshtni Nagar, Bilaspur, P,S. -CivU Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. 4. PETITION U/S 482 OF THE CODB OP CMMINAL PROCEDURE. (SB :Hon?ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.| Present:- Shri A.S. Ansari, Advocate for the petitioner. ORAL- ORDER (Passedon 11/11/2QQ9) This petition under Section 482 ofthe Code ofCrimiaal Procedure, 1973 (ia short <fh.e code?) for quashnient of the order dated 13/ 10/09 passed by fhe IVfh Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur m ciimmal revision No, 161/09 affirmmg the oi-der dated 2/9/08 passed by fhe Cliief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur whereby leained Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken tlie cognizaiice of tlie oSence under Section 420 of the Indiaa Penal Code agaiast the present petitioner, Quashment is prayed on tiie ground fhat witiiout ao.y prima facie evidence for taking cognizan.ee learaed Chief Judicial Magisti'ate has taken the cognizaace and thereby committed an illegality, Leai-ned counsel for fhe petitiouer are heard. Copy offhe order impugned and copy ofottier documents are perused. The crimmal complamt is based on mamly two documents sale deed executed by tiie petitioner m favour of fhe respoudent dated 8/5/03 2-— g 6. whereby fhe disputed laad 6 x 33 ^ sq, ft. ofground floor has been given to tlie respondent for exclusive use ofway subsequenfly by second sale deed dated 27/3/08 petitioner has sold the ground floor to aaother person aad has meationed ftie sale deed oth.er purchaser wUl use ftie aforesaid passage jomtly witli present respondent tiiese tavo sale deed is executed by fhe present petitioner contaiamg contradictoiy condition causing prejudice to the respoiident. After appreciating the inaterial available on record leanied Chief Judicial Magistrate has takeu Uie coguizance, I do not fiad aay extra ordmary exceptional case for iavoking extraordiaary itiherent jurisdiction. ConsequenUy, fhis petition is liable to be dismissed aad it is hereby disiaissed, Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^