THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.12471 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri T.S.Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. At their request, the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner filed application dated 02.05.2009 seeking approval of his building plan for constructing a house. He also paid Rs.12,920/- as fees along with the said application. Earlier, on 10.09.2008, the petitioner had applied for lay out regularization by paying Rs.35,774/- and regularization orders were passed thereon. On 01.10.2009 the Tahsildar, Malkajgiri Mandal, informed the Deputy Commissioner, GHMC that these lands were Government lands and that a No Objection Certificate should be obtained from the Collector, Ranga Reddy District, for construction permission. The said letter of the Tahsildar dated 01.10.2009 was the subject matter of challenge in W.P.No.3187 of 2010. This Court, by order dated 16.02.2010 in W.P.M.P.No.4203 of 2010 in W.P.No.3187 of 2010, granted interim suspension of the operation of the proceedings dated 01.10.2009 issued by the Tahsildar in respect of lands belonging to the petitioner herein. Sri T.S.Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, would contend that, despite the said proceedings of the Tahsildar being suspended, the respondent-GHMC was not considering the petitioner’s application for grant of permission to construct a building. Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, on instructions, would submit that since W.P.No.3187 of 2010 is still pending, the Corporation had not granted permission. Learned counsel would fairly state that the respondent-Corporation would examine the petitioner’s application in accordance with law without reference to the proceedings of the Tahsildar dated 01.10.2009 and, if the conditions prescribed under the GHMC Act, Rules, Regulations and Bye-Laws made thereunder, have been complied with, grant permission subject to the result of W.P.No.3187 of 2010. In view of the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel, I consider it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s application for grant of building permission in accordance with the provisions of the GHMC Act and Bye-Laws made therein and other statutory provisions applicable for grant of building permission in accordance with law within a period of four {4} weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With reference to the proceedings of the Tahsildar dated 01.10.2009, which has been suspended by the order of this Court dated 16.02.2010, it is made clear that any order passed by the second respondent on the petitioner’s application, including grant of permission, if any, will be subject to the result of W.P.No.3187 of 2010. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _______________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J) 7th June 2010 Note: CC by one week B/O RRB