e' !'!('. 01 %K u (^P(<SQ ^ ^s ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGAmiAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (St No.^^A'? /2006 ^^...-- Subaro @ Sukwaro, wife of Shri Baldeo Singh, aged about 23 years, Caste Gond, occupation- Sah Sahayika, R/o Baku-ama (Peeri Mahua) Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja, (C.G.) ^^ PETITIONER rl^< ••*' >-••''.-,s'3<J\^-"' ^s^'^"" y6°'^...---"" RE8PONDENTS '/•e,. i''^'*' fl ^^y S>~^y ""^^'s-;-.^: x^ -.c^^f ^yc' VERSUS 1^1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deptt. of Wonaen and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2, The Du-ector, Women and ChUd Welfare Deptt. Old Nurses Hostel Raipur, C.G. ^3. The Collector, Ambikapzir, Distt. Surguja, C.G. / 4. The District Programine OfGcer, Women and Child Developsient, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, C.G. ^/5. The Project Officer 85 Ex-ofGcio Secretary of Healfh, Women and Child Welfare Deptt. Project Preinnagar, Distt. Surguja, C.G. / 6. Chief Executive OfBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Preiaanagar, Distt. Surguja, C.G. /7. Snit. Sanapatiya W/o Prainod Kuniar, aged about 18 yrs, caste Baiyara, (OBC) occupation house ^wife, R/o village Peeri Mahua, (BakiriEna) PO. Nawaparakala, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja C.G. WRIT PETITION'UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH CQURT OF CHHATT1SGARH : BILASPUR PETITtONER WRIT PETITION (S) N0.5420 OF 2036 Subaro @ Sukwaro RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Atanu Ghosh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 1st day of April, 2011 ) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permissionof this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to other statutory forum, which may be available under the provislons of law. 2. Leamed counset appearing for other side has no objection. 3. lt is ordered, as prayed fpr. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. 5. Certified copy of the impugned order may be returned back to the petitioner on retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- SatisbK.Agmhotrl Judge 7^ Ashok