W/7 C9 $ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. “gm /2009 $ingle Banch Iv _ w./' 1. ’7 Uttam Singh, s/o D.NI Singh, aged about -4O Years, R/o Sonumuda, Devarpara, Raigarh, District— Raigarh (C.G.) 2./Reshamlal Kondh, S/o Labhoram Kondh, aged about 41 years, R/o.— Madhubanpara, Near Mahamaya Mandir Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3. ”Shiva Kumar Das,S/o Munudau Das, aged about 45 years, R/o.- Dimrapur, Puri Basti, Rgarh, Tahsil & District- Raigarh (C.G.) Sanji Kumar Yav /o Shyaml Yadav aged about 32 year, R/o.— Bagha Talab, Daupara, Raiarh, Tahsil & Distric Raigar (C.G. PETITIONERS - an ai 4. J v ad, S la s g t- h ) VERSUS /V C\ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Th rough- the Secreta ry, Department of General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Municipal Corporation, Raigarh through- Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS OF INDIA RESPONDENTS TITUION .mw (Wu) 51‘“? WWW ammm‘ 01139.2009 ’ 'Shri Amit Shanna, counsel for the petitioner. Ms, Sunita Jain, P.L. for the State. At the outset, counsel withdraw thi$ petition with Hbe: {i before the Commissioner, Mun further submits that direction 1 representation of the petitioner e makes any such representation in accord ance with 1aw. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawu with the aforesaid liberty. Pritinker Diwakel" Judge WWW}?! for the petitioner wants to .‘ty to iiie representation afresh .cipal Corporation Raigarh. He nay be issued for decicling the Xperiitiously. Counsel for the State has; no objection if the petitioner and the same is being decideri Wm§f§ém ewm Sdl-