WP(C) 6004/2004 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. U.K. Gos wami, learned Standing counsel, Education Department. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.06.04 by which earlier notification dated 01.03.2003 (Anneuxre-3) was cancelled. As per Annexure-3 not ification, the Assistant Teacher with Graduate degree working in intermediate sc ale of pay in Provincialised High Schools/Higher Secondary Schools would be enti tled to count their seniority from the date of their initial appointment. Howeve r, the said benefit would not be conferred to Classical and Hindi Teachers and n o financial implication would also involve. The said notification having been wi thdrawn by the impugned order dated 07.06.04, the petitioner filed the instant w rit petition primarily on the ground that before issuance of the impugned notifi cation no opportunity of being heard is given. Admittedly, so far as the Assistant Teachers working in High Schools/Hig her Secondary Schools are concerned, they are two different and distinct cadres, namely intermediate cadre and graduate cadre. Merely because one is a graduate working in the intermediate scale of pay, he cannot claim that he should be plac ed in the graduate cadre. The State Govt. having taken policy decision to withdr aw the earlier notification dated 01.03.2003 by the impugned notification dated 07.06.04 and the same being made applicable as a whole, it cannot be argued that each and every teachers should be given an opportunity of being heard. By the i mpugned notification dated 07.06.04, rules governing the field have been restore d which were done away with by the earlier notification dated 01.03.2003. The ma tter being one of the policies of the Govt. and nothing having been shown that t he same is arbitrary and/or malafide, no interference is called for. For all the aforesaid reasons, no relief can be granted. Accordingly, th e writ petition is dismissed. However, dismissal of the writ petition will not p reclude the petitioner to approach the Govt., if so advised.