IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 22601 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 23, 2011 Dr. Sri Bhagwan Tyagi. ….Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Pawan Girdhar, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent-Gram Panchayat (respondent No.5), as well as, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, have made statement at the Bar that petitioner shall not be dispossess without adopting due procedure of law. Both the learned counsel have stated that an appropriate proceeding for CWP No.22601 of 2010 eviction against the petitioner shall be carried out either under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act or under the Public Premises Act. On the statement of the learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. August 23, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2