IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9338 of 2001 Between: Musti Ravinder, S/o. Late Bichaiah, Thangedpally Road, Poddutoor, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 Bheem Reddy, Sub-Inspector of Police, Shankerpally Police Station, Shankerpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus," declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in interfering the civil dispute and encroaching on the private rights of the Petitioner by daily visiting the residence of the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere civil dispute as well as not to visit the house of the Petitioner without due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.LAXMAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.M.Laxman, submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 21-06-2005 vs To 1 The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 Two C.Cs to the G.P for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 2 CD copies.