IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-14412 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 29, 2011 Rajinder Kaur Chahal ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.Manish Soni, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.J.S,Bhullar, Assistant Adv. General, Punjab for respondent – State. Gurpreet Singh – complainant/respondent No.2 with Mr.Varun Baanth, Advocate. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The petitioner, by filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has sought quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.41 dated February 11th, 2006 (Annexure P1) registered under Sections 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Division No.4, District Jalandhar. Gurpreet Singh – complainant/ respondent No.2 is present in court. He has stated at bar that he has compromised the matter with the petitioner with the intervention of the relatives and friends. Compromise-deed (Annexure P2) has been placed on record. He also states that there is no ill-will left. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.41 dated February 11th, 2006 (Annexure P1) registered under Sections 420 and 506 IPC in Police Station Division No.4, District Jalandhar and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. September 29, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE