IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.38382 OF 2009 1. SAIJDA KHATOON @ SAJJO KHAN, WIFE OF AZIM KHAN 2. SAGUFTA, DAUGHTER OF AZIM KHAN 3. RAHMAN KHAN, SON OF AZIM KHAN 4. AZIM KHAN, SON OF LATE SALIM KHAN ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BIHTA, POLICE STATION RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT AURANGABAD …………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ARMANA KHATOON, DAUGHTYER OF AHSAM KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHAIRA, POLICE STATION RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT AURANGABAD ……………………………………………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES ****** 2 17/11/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has filed this application challenging the order dated 15.09.2009 by which the Court below has refused to discharge the petitioner in a case under Sections 376, 511, 341, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the same occurrence, one Rahman Khan was involved for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court below has distinguished the case of Rahman Khan with other accused persons and has separated the case. I find that there is no anomaly in the impugned order. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)