1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 43. WP/151/2010 (VIJAY GANPATRAO PUJARI V/S THE STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.G.Chapalgaonkar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Kadethankar, Adv., for respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 served. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 1/10/2010 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner, being sued by the Bank in Special Civil Suit No. 67/2007, before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, did not prosecute the same diligently, faced the brunt of "No W.S.Order". The suit is at the stage of hearing. Considering the nature of controversy and the time lag in between passing of the order and this date, it will be expeditious and explicit also to allow the defendant to tender his written statement before the 2 learned Judge seized with the matter. However, the condition precedent would be, the petitioner, as defendant, would be depositing an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs.one lac) with the Bank directly within one month from today, shall additionally pay Rs.2,000/- as costs, to be deposited before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad. 3. The order under challenge, though need not be faulted, however, in the fact situation, is set aside with above directions. Writ Petition allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/151-10wp