IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2008 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 29695 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: 1. ARUN.K.V., NEST, TC, 5/2282, KOWDIAR, JAWAHAR NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. BRIJIN.S., TC.69/737, JUDEY BHAVAN, POONTHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. JAYAKUMARI.L., KESAVA VILASOM, MUTTAKKAD, THIRUVALOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. LAKSHMI.M.R., SRAYAS, KOLLAI THOPPU, ULLOOR, MEDICAL COLLEGE PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-11 5. SUNILKUMAR.K.L., KESAVA VILASOM, POONKULAM, VELLAYANI PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. ANJU, SOMA VILLA, AYANAMKUZHY, VENPAKAL ATHIYANNOOR, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1. MARY MATHA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHN OLOGY, PALIYODE, KARIKARTHALA, DALMUGHAM PO., NEYYATTINKARA. 2. MARY MATHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (REG.NO.284), TC.25/242(5), 4TH FLOOR SOUNDARYA BUILDINGS, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001., REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, NEW DELHI, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 4. DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. FOR R5 SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R3 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.29695 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 24th October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are employees of the Mary Matha College of Engineering and Technology. According to them, they secured appointment by payment of huge refundable deposit. They now seek refund of the same. Exhibit P8 representation is pending before the respondents. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader and learned standing counsel for the 5th respondent. It is submitted that the 5th respondent has no jurisdiction to look into the grievance highlighted in Exhibit P8. In the circumstances, the writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue Exhibit P8. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma 2 3