HMTXE $E§~3§E§ IN THE HIGH coukT OF CHHAmseARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s), No; ‘7 :7) 77 OF 2010 BETWEEN X, 1. Ajam Beg S/o LaTe Shri Rain Beg , aged abou‘l' 35 years, occupaTion \ service, PosTed as ElecTrical AssisTanT, Nagar Panchayaf Deokar R/o Ward No. 12, Deokar, Dis’rric’r Durg (C6). 2/ Girdhari Sinha 5/0 Shri Shivdayat Sinhu , aged about 42 years, occupation service, PosTed as Senefary Inspecfor, Nagar PanchayaT Deokar R/o Ward No. 1, Nadipar Deokar, DisTricT Durg (CG). . 3. /' Arjun GupTa 5/0 Shri Sidhram Gupfa , aged about 41 years, occupation service, Posted as Pump Attendent, Nagar Panchayat Deokar R/o Ward No. 5, Kesharwanipara Deokar, District Durg (CG). 4:“ Santosh Nishad 5/0 Shri Krishna Nishad , aged about 36 years, occupation service, Posted as Time, Keeper, Nagar Panchayat Deokar R/o Ward No. 6, Bramhanpara Deokar, District Durg (C6). 5.6 Sajar Beg S/o Shri Ismail Beg , aged about 33 years, cupation service, Posted as Pump Attendant , Nagar Panchayat eokar R/o Ward No. 15, Musaimanpara Deokar, District Durg CG). ~ 6.]Laxminarayan Sihore S/o Shri Kejuram Sihore , aged about 42 years, occupation Service, Posted as Tractor Driver, Nagar Panchayat Deokar R/o Ward No. 6, Main Road Deokar, District Durg (C6). 7. Munna Sinha S/o Shri Shivdayai Sinha , aged about 36 years, occupation Service, Posted as Plumber, Nagar Panchayat Deokar ‘R/o Ward No. 11 Beachpara, Deokar, District Durg (CG). 8. Santosh Sweeper S/oi‘shlri‘Ratnu Sweeper , aged about 30 ' ”years, occupation service, Post’ed as Sweeper, Nagar Panchayat ‘ Deokar R/o Ward No. 14, Dewanganpara, Deokar, District — Durg (CG). ' W77! / D c f 9. Budhar'u Nishad 5/0 Late Shri Khorbaham Nishad aged abouT 43 years, occupafion service, PosTed @s Chowkidar‘, Nagar‘ Panchuym‘ Deokar' R/o Ward No. 11, Beechpam Deokar', Disfr‘ic’r Dur'g (CG). AND @ PETI‘IIONERS k’f‘ The S‘rafe of Chhatfisgar'h, through The prihéiple Secremr‘y, Urban Deparfmen‘r of Administration Development Manf’mlay af D.K.S. Bhqwan, Raipur (CG). ; J7 of 2.“ The Under Administration and 'Developmen Raipur‘ (CG). 3. The Director, Directorate of U'rbhn Adminisfrafion and Dev‘e‘iapmen’r Deparimenf, Chhaffisgarh, Raipur (CG). g: V 4. The Nagar Panchayaf Deokar, fhraugh its Chief Municipal Officer, Deokar, Disfricf — Durg (CG). e Secrefary, Depurfmen‘r and Urban t, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, KN WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITLTUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS @ J Arun PETiTmNER§ ‘ RE$PONDENT x@ tiQH'hQOUREOF §HHATTISGARH : $ILA$?UR WRIT PETITION (S) N07??? OF 201Q Ajam 399 & Others Vefsus The $tate of Chhattisgarh & Others (Wvit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of mdia) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihbtri, J. u.~-.um..-..-w.-n.-3—...we.-1....-a..."....~_‘~mmg.uuw.-._’-.m.mm“...n.‘.~~«.¢u~4u«ans.m-.-.M Present :— Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitionere. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri PP. Sahu, Advocate for the respondent No.4; “awn...“ A mu»... mwmn»h.mwn.”. OR§§R §Q§AL1 (Paseed e22 this 25 day of February. 201 1) _ At the very outset, learned oounsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present petition as well as in a Others v. state or Chhamsgam & omers’, which was considered and decided by this Court on 2U.01.2011, are identical. , the said issue was reconsidered in Virendra'Des Manikpwi & omens 10.02.2011. Thus, the instant petition is squarely covered by the orders this court in Dhaniram & Others’ and Virendra Das Manikpun' Dhaniram Thereafter passed by & Others? .2. ‘ in view of v. rhe state or Ghhaztisgam & others? by this cum an- the eubmission made by leamed counsel eepearing for th parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of. the orders passed in Dhanirsm & Others’ and Virendra Des Manikpun‘ & Others? Sd/- r Satish K. Agnihotri I Judge wly 1 w;i=‘.(s) No. 6798 of 2010, decided on 20.1 .201 1 2 were) Nor 7450M 2010 , decided on 10.22011 ”4, e