IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2011 / 10TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 1807 of 2011(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- U.P.BEERANKUTTY, URALIKUTH, PALOOR, ALLI P.O., MUKKOM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE-673 020. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.MANOJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb WP(C).No. 1807 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 30.07.2010 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 1807 OF 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a stage carriage operator operating a stage carriage service on the route Mukkom – Thekkumkutty – Thottakkad – Kooderenhi – Thiruvambadi – Cheruvadi – Chennamangaloor via Vallathipara – Pannimukku – Karamoola – Thiruvambady Estate – Kodiyathur – Manassery and Kolamundai on the strength of a regular permit. He applied for a variation of the permit and that was granted by the Regional Transport Authority, Kozhikkode, as can be seen from Ext.P1 proceedings dated 30.07.2010. This writ petition is filed contending that though more than ten months have passed thereafter, till date, the time schedule have not been settled and the variation has not been endorsed on the original of the permit. 2. When the writ petition came up for hearing today, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted on instructions that after the writ petition was filed, a timing conference was held and the timings were settled on W.P.(C).No. 1807 OF 2011 2 02.02.2011. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of the writ petition with the direction that, if till date, the variation has not been endorsed on the original of the permit and a copy of the proceedings settling the timings have not been issued to the petitioner, the respondent shall take necessary steps in that regard expeditiously and in any event within one week from the date on which the petitioner produces a copy of this judgment before the respondent. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE dmb