: 1 : cwp-95-11=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.95 OF 2011 Dr. Leeja Hemant Vettiyadan .. Petitioner v/s. Mr. Vettiyadan Hemant Scaria .. Respondent ......... Ms. Ushaji Peri i/b Mr. Mihir Desai for the petitioner Ms. Deepa Matwankar for the respondent ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 19th APRIL, 2011 P.C. : 1. It is seen that the petitioner had filed custody petition namely Petition No. D-73 of 2009 against the respondent to have the custody of the daughter namely Ishita. In the said custody petition, from time to time, three applications were filed and reliefs sought in these three applications were of independent nature. It is noticed that the learned Judge of the Family Court has from time to time disposed of those three applications and orders are passed. The petitioner by this petition has challenged all the three orders by filing a common petition. In my view, in order to sort out the things in a proper manner and to enable the : 2 : cwp-95-11=.sxw respondent to deal with each application and each order distinctly and properly, it was necessary for the petitioner to file separate petition challenging a particular order. In my view, challenging three orders in one common petition is not a proper method to deal with those three orders. 2. In view of this, the petitioner is directed to file three separate petitions challenging each order separately. With this, petition stands disposed of. All contentions are left open. This court has not expressed any views on merits of each of the order. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)