* 1 * FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2009 W I T H CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.100 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2009 ( RAMESH H.BHANUSHALI V/S.BABAN HARIBHAU PANSARE & ORS.) ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or Court's or Judge's directions and Registrar's orders orders ___________________________________________________________ Mr.S.P.Shetye,adv.for applicant. Mr.D.S.Dube, adv.for respondent. Ms.S.D.Shinde, APP for State. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 20TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. The consent terms signed by the parties, advocate for applicant, respondent no.1 and advocate for respondent no.1 are taken on file whereby the parties have compounded the proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. The * 2 * consent terms are taken on file and marked `X' for identification. 3. In view of compounding of the offence, the Criminal Revision Application is allowed. The judgment and order dated 22nd January, 2009 passed by the 7th Ad- hoc Sessions Judge, Seewri in Appeal No.108 of 2008 and the judgment and order dated 7th March, 2008 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 20th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai in C.C.No.624/SS/2003 are quashed and set aside. The applicant is acquitted in C.C.No.624/SS/2003. The applicant be released from the jail unless required in any other case. 4. In view of disposal of the Revision Application, Criminal Application No.100 of 2009 does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed off. * 3 * [JUDGE]