CRP 48/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.MADAN B. LOKUR The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 8.10.2010 passed by the Mu nsiff No.2, Guwahati in Miscellaneous (J) No.516 of 2010 in T.S. No.282/2010. In the miscellaneous application, the petitioner has sought implementati on of the earlier order dated 19.7.2010 passed by the learned Trial Court for se aling the electrical line from the main meter to the suit premises in occupation of the petitioner by removing the cut out or M.C. fixed by the opposite party f or disconnection of the supply of electricity. The application was dismissed on the basis of a report given by the Civi l Nazir on 24.8.2010 to the effect that the electricity connection of the petiti oner had not been disconnected. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the Misc. (J) No.516 of 2010 was filed on or about 26th August, 2010, which is after the report of th e Civil Nazir. Under the circumstances, a fresh report either should be called from a L ocal Commission to be appointed by the Trial Court. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the matter is rem itted back to the learned Trial Court for having a fresh report from a Local Com missioner. In view of the above, the revision petition is allowed and the order dat ed 8.10.2010 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the learned Trial C ourt to appoint an advocate as a Local Commissioner. The parties will appear before the Trial Court on 23rd August, 2011 for further proceedings. The cost of the local Commissioner will be borne by the petitioner.