IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21096 of 2009 AJIT KUMAR MAHTO @ AJIT KUMAR MEHTA, Son of Mahendra Mahto, Resident of Village- Israur, Police Station- Deo, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). . . . Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 28.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that both the parties are neighbours. There was some altercation, no doubt, with otherwise grudge. The allegation regarding committing of theft after entering into the house was attributed which, during investigation, finds no support from reliable witnesses, so charge- sheet was submitted for the offence under bailable Sections. Petitioner was allowed bail by the police itself. Cognizance has been taken for the offence under Sections 457 and 380 of Indian Penal Code and again he is apprehending his arrest. Considering the allegation, petitioner has already been allowed on bail in the case and there is no reporting about misuse of privilege of bail so granted to him, he is ordered to continue on the same bail granted in connection with Deo P.S. case no. 53 of 2008 / Tr. No. 1500 of 2008 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Aurangabad. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Mandhata Singh, J.)