IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.575 of 2008 KAMAL KUMAR PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the appellant : Mr.Ramendra Prasad Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate ----- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----- Dated, the 11th September, 2008 Even if, we assume that the appointment of respondent no.5 was bad in law, in our view, by efflux of time, the appellant was not entitled to any relief in writ jurisdiction. It is admitted position that the subject appointment of ‘Sikhsa Mitra’ was for a period of eleven months ensuing from 03rd March, 2003. Eleven months expired on 3rd February, 2004. Obviously, no relief could have been granted by the court to the petitioner, even if it was held that the appointment of respondent no.5 was bad in law. 2. Dismissal of writ petition by the Single Judge does not call for any interference. 3. L.P.A. is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil