IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 9035 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ ABDUL SALAM,PALANJI KOCHUTHARAYIL, PADANAIRKULANGARA SOUTH,KARUNAGAPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, R.D.O.OFFICE,CHENGANOOR. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, KRISHNAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 9035 OF 2009 (Y) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that his land is a fully developed garden land, but however is described as paddy field in the revenue records. It is stated that in order to maintain the coconut trees already planted, he has to put soil in the land and seeking permission for the same, he has filed Ext.P2 before the 2nd respondent. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P2, despite Ext.P3 report, submitted by the 3rd respondent. Since the complaint of the petitioner is regarding the delay on the part of the 2nd respondent in passing orders on Ext.P2 in the light of Ext.P3, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 2nd respondent shall consider Ext.P2 in the light of Ext.P3 report. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp