c ^/ \ ^7/— ^111 IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s) N0. UBJ^ OF 2009 PETITIONER Vs RESPQNbENTS ^Panchram, son of Late Shri J.L. Sahu, aged 39 years, Occupation-Service, Presently posted as Shiksha Karmi Grade- I at Government Higher Secondary School, Konari, District Raipur (CG) ^" 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyaan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. TheSecretary, Department of Panchayat <& Rural bevelopment Department, State of Chhattisgarh. , Dau Kalyaan Singh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. ^' 3. bistrict Panchayat (Education), Raipur through its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur (CG) PETITION UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INt>IA HC—78 »tW<»tT§SW<^ "S^f ^i^id^ yal^Ko, "^TRTy ••^-c&l-u°l-y-^2oo«, sn^T^WCrt^) ^it^^fWiN -d®tT311^T9mi^- "g^TOt'8^1 3lf^?T 8B : HON'BLB 8HRI JU8TICB PI|UTINKBR DIWAKBR 03.08.2009 Shri Malay Shnvastava, Shn Ajay Dwivcdi, Dy. G,A. Chatlenge ia fhe present ^qt^pfr^ "^tq^f ^ fa^l <Ft1^K ^afRmsfl^r coijinsel 20.07.2009 passed by responder^t No.l by which the petitioner who is workiag as Shiksha Karmi for fhe petitioner. for the State. betition is to fhe order dated Grade I (Econoiaics) has been traasferred froixi Gtoveramient Hi^her Secondary School, Konari, Palad, Distt. Raipur to Goverrlment High School, Dhaasir, Bilaigarh. Contention of coiinsel fojr fhe petitioner is fhat fhe petitioner was appoiated for fhe jEconomics subject aod except him fhere is ho ofher teacher of] where he is presenfly posted. Hi^ petitioner is said to have l{ rationalization schenie but even |fhe said subject in fhe school further contention is fhat fhe ken traasferred under fhe tf* fhis scheine is appUed as it is, fhe petitioner caEmot be treajted as a surplus teacher. His contention is fhat the petition^r was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade I on 9.8,2008 aad |iU completion of his probation period, he should not have been 1|raasferred. Conteution of counsel for |fhe respondents/State is fhat let fhe petitioner make a si^itable representation to fhe aufhorities conceraed which wojiild be decided ia accordaiice .wiUiJav^J\)Jthis^ropositio^^€^ [ T "•'J"-"^ "!lx "l%S|s^, | •A^ '^. '••!'»'..^XI-HC—78 ^^ ^i k'li^ WT 3?!^? ^^li^ IV/ ^-^ 'ysr '^i<<i<n^, yiTii^4i<o, fc«yii-M^< ^,.^^-.......w-..^...^..^ft/..., HW^ Sb^Seb' ^I^T ^W (^^3^^) '^iIW^ft^^it^ uie peuuoner stiowea ms agre^ uiterkn protection tiU fhe decided by fhe aufhonties conc^raed rep(resentatic Accordiagly fh.e petition ohl^f<ri41^ 'WT^lf ^ 'feT^ Tf^^R '^'siRTH^T^T ;ment. However, ne prays tor an resentation of flie petitioner is is disposed of wifh a direction fhat if tlie petitioner m.akes a ^epresentation to fhe aufhorities conceraed wifhia a period ofte^. days froia fhe date ofreceipt of copy of* fhe order/ftxe aufhorjties conceraed shaU decide fhe same wifhin. a further period ol| tliree weeks froni fhe date of its receipt. TiU fhen fhe order imp so far as it relates to the petitio^ier. Ligned shatl be kept ia abeyance Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^