1312lpa464.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR L. P. A. NO. 464 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2011 Madhukar Sadashiv Korde & Another Vs. Mah. Revenue Tribunal Nagpur & Ors. ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri J. C. Shukla Adv for appellant. Shri R. D. Bhuibhar Adv for respondents. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE JJ. DATED: 13th DECEMBER, 2011. Heard Shri Shukla learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Bhuibhar learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 and Shri Pathan learned AGP for respondents 1 and 2. Contention is order of Additional Commissioner which found petitioner in continuous possession and also owner of agricultural lands in question has not been appreciated by the learned Single Judge. According to respective counsel for respondents there is no such finding recorded by Additional Commissioner. We have 1312lpa464.11 2 perused order of Additional Commissioner and said order dated 01.12.1976 does not show the continuous possession as alleged or then any ownership in present appellants. Shri Shukla learned counsel at this stage makes a request for adjournment as according to him Written Statement filed by the petitioner before Civil Court may contain certain assertions to support their claim for ownership. Said document was not shown to learned Single Judge and hence we are not inclined to grant any adjournment on that count. We, therefore, dismiss the present Letters Patent Appeal. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE svk