8 F ( 0 L — - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH \S b W.P. C N0. , Of 2007. PETITIONERS :- /f.‘ Nandlal Nathani, aged 46 years, son PLAINTIFFS of Asardar Nathani, resident of Kasturbanagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and . District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), Rajkumar Railwani, aged 29 years, son of Arjun Das Railwani, resident of Nehrunagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS :- .. Vinod Kumar, aged 38 years, son of Tekchand, Rakesh Kumar, aged 33 years, son of Tekchand, . Kishun Bai alias Bisun Bai, aged 51 years, daughter of Tekchand, Prabhabai, aged 34 years, Wife of Shobhamani Upadhayay, resident of Innont of Kalika Nagar Silver Bal School, Ti&a, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), . Smt. Kejabai, aged about 76 years, widow of Tekchand, Respondent no. 1 to 3 and 5 resident of Chakarbhata Camp, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), I?” We KY RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS ; , . @ 6. Laxminarayan Dubey, aged 50 years, son of Mukhidas Dubey, resident of Village Bodri, Mohalla Bhatapara, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgaih), 7. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). Tahsil and District Dufg (C.G.), \ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITIJTION OF INDIA w:\7 XI—HC—78 c . o....‘.o.‘..oo.o.o.oo \ WWW WWW m m w m WW wW %3TIT\<W311%$ 5-2-2UU‘7‘ b‘m‘i k'anKaj Agrawal, H€ard. This petition is dire passed bv th€ 31d Additiona i—Ai 2006, wiléreby application of the defendants for amenciment in een allowed. )r the petitioners submits that the t was not supported by an affidavit of application has been allowed, contraiy to 1preme Court in the matter of S‘uiem i —v- U‘nton of indict reported in (2095} 6 SCC €544. i have heard learned counsei for the petitioners. i have gone Through the judgment cited by the petitioners as also the impugned ion for amendment has been allowed and opinion that there is no illegalitv in the g grave injustice or failure ofjustice to the enerence m? this Court in the exercise of rticle '2’2'7 of the Constitution of India. The petition is liable to be disnwiissecl at the admission stage itself and is Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Advocatf: for thc pgiitimmrs. cted against the order of ammxuxe P-S 11 District JudgE, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. the wntten statement has i: Learned counsei f: appiication for amendmen defenc‘iants, even then the law 181d down bv the '§ Advacate Bar Associatim order whereby the applicat this Court is of considered impugned order occasionin parties, which calls for int Jurisdiction vested under A herehv dismissed. Judge a ,_...,. hire P.T.O. WW7WW wP(c>:m.;gg /Qoo;z mW<W>