IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 143 of 2010 Date of decision: 25.11.2010 Raj Kumar …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Add. A.G. No. 1 and 2. For the respondents: Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. No. 3, 4, 10, 14 and 24. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) This petition is totally misconceived. The allegation of the petitioner is that in view of the order (Annexure P-2) partition proceedings cannot take place in the village. This objection may be raised before the Officer before whom such partition proceedings are pending and the Officer is directed to decide the same in accordance with the law. With these observations the petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 25th November, 2010 (Deepak Gupta) ™ Judge 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes.