IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.994 of 2009 UMA SHANKAR TRIPATHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03. 08.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly acknowledges that the State of Jharkhand was not a party respondent in C.W.J.C. No. 6772 of 2001. Learned counsel for the State points out that after the order on the writ petition the petitioner has represented before the authorities at Jharkhand, where he posted for implementation of the same. This Court does not find it possible to proceed any further in the contempt jurisdiction. If so advised, the petitioner may appropriately utilize the order of this Court in an appropriate proceeding before the Competent Forum in the State of Jharkhand. The application stands disposed. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)