1 cr-apln-5038-09 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLN. NO. 5038 OF 2009 Gagasingh Amansingh Tak ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan Adv. for Applicant Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2 The applicant has preferred this application through jail. The applicant was an accused in CR No. 3282 of 2004 of Hadapsar Police Station, Pune. The said case pertains to M.C.O.C. Case No.5 of 2005. The grievance of the applicant is that there is no progress in the trial in the said case. 3 The learned APP on instructions states that the trial in the 2 cr-apln-5038-09 said case is over and the applicant has been acquitted in the said case by judgment and order dated 8.1.2010. Thus, the grievance of the applicant no longer survives. 4 The learned APP has pointed out that the applicant is involved in two other cases i.e. CR No.45 of 2004 of Chatushrungi Police Station, Pune (Sessions Case No. 385 of 2005) and CR No. 58 of 2002 of Swargate Police Station, Pune (Sessions Case No. 484 of 2004). The learned APP stated that the applicant has been released on bail in both the said cases by order dated 8.1.2010. In view of the fact that the applicant is no longer in jail and he has been released on bail in two pending cases, this application is disposed of as infructous. 5 Advocate Ms. Kuttikrishnan be paid fees as per the Rules. 6 Application disposed of. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]