SB: iiéWELE $§i§ EiiimWE‘ Petitioner \‘mt. Accusad w \A i HRA,J. Sheeia Vm‘ma, aged about 3.) years, n, ppampm Sf magal‘, N 681‘ ‘ 3 uuv pur, A ‘vu;u‘_.;; . ‘ H011 £9 Poucc: i I about 4.; years, 510. ag Bo‘miE, agea f‘kamrxof Dan Qn'h ‘ tap Colonv, Bilaspur, Police station rmm‘h, Bilaspur {c.G.) an Rmmmvr mf vumym mw Fm, 1 12-12—265}? Sm‘t. Hamida Sickiqui, UO Heard. BV this patition mlder tit ictiou 4S2 of The C1‘.P.C., th€ petmoner has praVEci for quaShing of t‘Ihe order (iamd 23.1l.2007 passed in "ompiajnt Case N0.§Ut5/U:) ‘i buaspur. The oniy gmum‘i urged t dufinq the pendency of tine Magistrate, the complainant Adalai umier Section 2'2 {a} OI {for V'short', herein afier referr sought hy"'t11e complainant per (’2) of Secfion '22 C of the Act of apphcationv is mach: unaer s1 ‘ Chmadan Lei Vanna, Shiv W311i " No.370 Tempie, {Deepuperal §IaTlOI1 5 vunud; y v “‘MI, ‘Tan)anar, QugTQhsil and Di gist Rilae‘pntiCLG: 111se1 for the pstmoner. )3? Kemed Chief Judicial Magisirate, V the petitioner iil U115 petition is mat Complaint Case before Chief Judicial also approached the permanent Lott e Legal Sewices Authorities Act, 198i to as the Act of 1987) and the relief s to the same dispute and sub—section 1987 specifleallv mentions that atter an basection (l) of Section '22 C to the weu em WW,W FS/s9— 3/2007 —30,ooo, h e t s h ' i WW,W,W m WCwmPN°“59>1/a 200 mm (WW) E16 l ‘ A