17 JD SHRS s-p"NAYAK' C"J-_. 2, 7" 5. versus 1. Machhua Sahkari Samiti Rajnandaaon, P^P^&ented Ballu Ram Nishad S/o Shn OmQncll Nishad, About37 •Jat Maa Samiti Marayadit, at Biock Mohala, Dlstrict (C.G.) of Chhattlsgarh, Through The of Panchayat & Devetopment, •D.K.S. Raspur (C.G.) The Department of Panchayat < Ne-arD.K.S.Bh-awan, (C.G.) Th®Coitector, District Rajnandgaon. C.G- The Chief Executive Officer, Distnct Rajnandgaon, S/o about 33 Years, Representing Machhua S-amuh, Gram^ panchayat Gotatola, BSoc.k Rajnandgaon, C.G. presoQt ^ '^'^^^^^^^^^- . GA-:ior^e^s^. ^Sa^a^J^^^IW^^WW^:, ^: Syh^sTn^ ieirnedG^^the^o,^. £.^i^Jai^^mea'counsel fo^spondertN^^ ^ £'eS R'aj'puTtonedcounsel for respondentNo^ 4-r2- ^t -2.- 'i iMdNNniNnii'r ^.; IIBIN^. on 31st January, The brought the Court by way of thls wrlt to the ©ntitiemeniof the rivai to fishing right In a tank ^ituate in Gotatola, Btock in whlch is as Tank'. it the was to the fifth on an-d tliat right was on for a The petitjoner here'n, aggrieved by the of the responrtent in renewing'fishing riuht in favour of the fifth for a up to 30/06/2004, preferred a revision to the Colfector, the third respondent herein. When the revision by the petltloner was pending before th@ tnlrd re^pondent, It the renewai of jn favour of the fifth up to by the by an 30/08/2002. in the the fifth respondent aiso filed to the the cancellation. The respondent the revlslons and by hls order 28/01/2003 the to the fourth re^pondent to oonslder the question of of of fi^hlng nght in of the no-rms and guldeilnes by the Department. The fourth re^pondent did not of the within six tho in the the of in the- 18/07/2003. as an the for of and the respondent entertaining the said of the an order on 17/01/2004 granting fishing right to the petltioner for a period of five years. The fifth respondent besng aggrieved k -3- 4-^ ^1^ . by th@ said order ^referred an to the Director, Dep-artment of and the The the and the of the respond-ent by his orderdated 05/05/2004. The fjfth respondent flied a v/rlt W.P. NO.-1351 of 2004 that in thls Court and thb Court by Ite order 04/06^2004 of the writ petition resen/ing liberty to the petltioner to prefer a revision to the Government the order of the above of the second Accordlngiy, the fifth reviston to the and fhe flrst by the order the and to the fifth for the endlng This- writ petition js the order of the Government, (2) ! for the if i may say so. was s fjaw on the part of the in fishlng rlgh? to the pe+ltfoner vide 17/01/2004 for a of fjve years, j say this, because, the of of fishing right granted by the fourth re3pondent on 30/06/2001 up to the period ending 30/06/2004 was admittedly by the. pemioner herein before the third rQspond^nt. As alreaQy out supra, the r^vision by tne the a was by the the to the fourth for of the thu-s, the herein without the fifth respondent ms m respondent moved an appJicatlon the ColSector and 3ought gmnt of of fJ3hlng right for a period of five \L &^^ 4-^i ^3 -^f- years. !n that vlew of the no coutd be to the of the Govemment 09/05/2005. .in Tank was not to the fifth in iaw 30/06/2005. Therefore, the of the hgs to be In accord^nce with. law, In vlew of the while dbmlssing thls wrlt petltlon, i dlrect re^pondente 3 and 4 to up appropriate immediate to auotlon the fishing right of'the "GotatoEa Tank" Btrictly in accordance with law, No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice