IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.998 of 2007 1. DR. ARUN KUMAR SINGH 2. DR. ANITA SINGH, W/O- DR ARUN KUMAR SINGH BOTH ARE RESIDENCE OF H-28, DOCTOR’S COLONY, KANKARBAGH, P.S.- PATRAKAR NAGAR, PATNA-20 Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA 3. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, PATRAKARNAGAR POLICE STATION, PATNA 4. MR. RAM PRAVESH JHA, ASSISTANT SUB- INSPECTOR OF POLICE-CUM-INVESTIGATING OFFICER OF PATRAKARNAGAR P.S. CASE NO. 25 OF 2007. 5. DR. R.P.SINGH SON OF LATE RAMGULELA SINGH, RESIDENT OF H-21, DOCTORS COLONY, KANKARBAGH, PATNA-800020. ----------- 12 01.07.2009 Petitioner has filed the present writ application invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. They have prayed for quashing of the F.I.R. of Patrakarnagar P.S. case no. 25 of 2007 dated 28.4.2007 instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners fairly states that during the pendency of the present proceeding, the police concluded investigation of the said case and submitted chargesheet whereupon the court in seisin of the matter has already taken cognizance. The petitioners, therefore, now want to challenge the order taking cognizance. There is no dispute that the Criminal Procedure Code provides adequate remedy to the petitioners if they are aggrieved by the order taking cognizance and desire to challenge the same. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the 2 petitioners states that they shall file application/proceeding putting in issue the said order of the learned Trial Court by which cognizance has been taken. Having appreciated the fair stand taken by the counsel for the petitioner, this court does not propose to proceed further with the present writ application. The application is accordingly disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )