IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4813 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.01.2011 Muni Lal . . .Petitioner Versus Rajinder Kumar . . . Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) CM-19180-CII-2010 Application is allowed as prayed for. CM-19181-CII-2010 Application is allowed as prayed for. CM-520-CII-2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. CM-521-CII-2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. CR No.4813 of 2010 (O&M) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue of relationship of landlord and tenant was raised before the learned Appellate Authority on the ground that the property in dispute is not linked with the sale deed by which Rakesh Khanna had become the owner. It is submitted that in order to prove the said fact, two documents were relied upon, i.e. sale deed dated 10.06.1997 and partition deed dated 07.04.1999 which have not been dealt with by the learned Appellate Authority. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this revision petition in order to file review application before the learned Appellate Authority. Dismissed as withdrawn. January 12, 2011. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE