IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2009 SHRI. HARISHCHANDRA SHIVA SAWANT ... Petitioner Versus SMT. NANDA SHAMBA SAWANT AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. D. J. Pangam,Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Thalmann Peireira, Advocate for respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 22nd November, 2010 P.C. Heard Mr. Pangam, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pereira, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. This revision is directed against the order rejecting an application under Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. for dismissal of the Regular Civil Suit no.7/2009 filed by the respondents in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bicholim. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties, I find that the order passed by the trial Court rejecting the application cannot be said to be in excess or without jurisdiction. This is not a fit case in which the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII, Rule 11 of C.P.C. Hence, the application is dismissed. 4. Needless to mention that all the defences of the petitioners in the suit are kept open. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA