IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14061 of 2010 DHANANJAI PASWAN son of Late Basudeo paswan. Resident of village- Birwar, Police Station Mahishi, District- Saharsa. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sarita Devi wife of Dhananjai Paswan, Daughter of Bhola Paswan, resident of village- Mahisarho, Police Station- Mahishi, district- Saharsa. ----------- 6. 03.03.2011 It is apparent that the marital discord between the two that is the husband petitioner and the complainant opposite party No. 2 is not because of any demand of dowry for the simple reason that the marriage had taken place in the year 1998 and the couple blessed with a son who is about ten years old. It is apparent that the discord is because of the petitioner developing intimacy with some other lady. The solution to this problem is not the prosecution, the solution to the problem is not imprisonment those would only aggravative problem. The Family Judge and other Judicial Officers should keep in mind the matter before deciding such cases in a mechanical manner as deciding pure and simple criminal case. Efforts should have been made at that level itself to bring about conciliation without forcing the parties to travel to Patna again and again which is not only time consumption but is expensive as well. In such situation in my view it is apt that in event of arrest or surrender of petitioner in relation to Complaint Case No. 1666C of 2009 instituted under Section 498A read with Dowry Prohibition Act and pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. Be that as it may, in the event of his arrest or 2 surrender, let the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-( Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Complaint Case No. 1666-C of 2009, subject to the condition, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)