FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.807 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Sanjay Bhatia for the Applicant. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 27/2/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Though the matter is placed for order, the advocate for the applicant has argued the matter on merits. The point is raised that the complainant has made the proprietary concern as party and the sole proprietor is separate accused. It is sought to be argued that this will cause prejudice to the Proprietor. I fail to see what prejudice will be caused to the proprietary concern. The Proprietor may be punished for the acts committed by him for and on behalf of the firm or otherwise if the same amounts to an offence. There is no substance in the application. Hence, application is rejected. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)