IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.150 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Azam S/o Farjand ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 19, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.503 of 2009 Under Section 307 of IPC P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri R.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State and also perused the record. In brief, the prosecution story is that Kunwar Singh lodged the FIR at P.S. Kotwali Roorkee alleging that on 18.12.2009 at 02:30 PM his daughter was coming back from tuition. The applicant having jug of acid in his hand was chasing his daughter. The applicant asked his daughter that he would finish her because she does not obey him. Then the applicant has thrown acid on his daughter due to which she received injuries. Thereafter the applicant fled from the spot by hurling abuses. With the same averments, Kunwar Singh, father of the victim, lodged the FIR on the same day at 04:30 PM at P.S. Kotwali, Roorkee, District Haridwar. The victim was medical examined at Combined Hospital, Roorkee and following injuries were found on her body:- i) Blister present over right side of head ii) Blister present over right side of face iii) Blister present over right side of neck iv) Blister present over left side face near neck v) Blister present over left side neck vi) Blister present over both side chest vii) Blister present over dorsum of right foot viii) Blister on dorsum of right hand and left hand. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the said case and no case u/s 307 IPC is made out against the applicant. Per contra, learned brief holder for the State has submitted that on 18.12.2009 the applicant thrown acid on the body of the victim due to which she received number of burn injuries on her body. The contents of the FIR get corroborated from the medical report. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and on perusing the medical report and looking into the seriousness of the offence, I am of the view that the applicant does not deserve bail. The bail application is liable to be rejected and is rejected accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 19.03.2010 RG