IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1931 CRP.No. 1005 of 1998(B) ----------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19/02/1998 IN IA 3222/97 IN I.A.3935/94 IN OS.468/1992 of PRL.S.C.,THALASSERY .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): --------------------- K.C.LAKSHMANAN, 21 PRIYA NETHAJI PALKER MARGH, CHATKOPUR, BOMBAY - 400 084 RETD. BY COMMANDER OF INDIAN NAVY, ELAYAVOOR AMSOM, KEEZHTHALLI DESOM. BY ADV.SRI. PARTHASARATHY SRI. R. BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. K.C. SAKUNTHALA, ELAYAVOOR AMSOM KEEZHTHALLI DESOM 2. K.C. YESODA, VARDHAMAN NAGAR R.P. ROAD, KUKKUNTHU, WEST BOMBAY 400 080, ELAYAVOOR AMSOM KEEZHTHALLI DESOM, KANNUR TALUK. 3. DR. JAMNADAS, NAROTHAM RAVALID, MAHALAKSHMI TEMPLE COMPOUND RESIDING AT THULASI BHAVAN BOMBAY 400 026. 4. K.C. MUKUNDAN, ELAYAVOOR AMSOM KEEZHTHALLI DESOM, NOW RESIDING AT NAHOOR MUKUND ST. PAULOSE COLONY AT NO.23, BOMBAY 400 080. BY ADV. SRI. P.N.K.ACHAN (SR.) SRI.SHEJI.P.ABRAHAM THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P. NO: 2016 OF 1998 IN C.R.P. NO: 1005 OF 1998 DISMISSED. SD/- (M.K.JOSEPH) SD/-(M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE JUDGE 12.11.2009 // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE dl/ K. M. JOSEPH & JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.R.P. NO: 1005 OF1998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th Day of November, 2009. O R D E R K. M. Joseph J., This petition is filed against the order passed by the Court below rejecting the application filed by the second defendant in the suit to determine the issue regarding equities and reservations before the Commissioner is appointed in the suit. The court below, while considering the application filed, took the view that the matter can be agitated before this court and having found that decree is merged in the appellate decree, that petition was dismissed. No doubt, there is no merger as such. Since the matter was is pending in appeal, we do not wish to interfere with the order. Accordingly the C.R.P. is dismissed. K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE. dl/