s s »ni \ "~v" ^ ^ IN THB HIGH COUBI OF JODICAIUHB AT JABALPUB ..(M£l WEII PBI'IIION N0. lbt^ 1/2000 PETIIION UNDEB ABTICLES 226 AND 227 OF 1'HE CONSIITUl'IOI OF INDIA S££^£IO B '/f7 P.B.S.Oil Industries Limited, in ( A company^fcorporated under the Companies &ct5certificate of in- corporation No.3846/87) Industrial Area ^ Arymi 5.8hamtari ^ District Dhamtari. Through Director^ Shri Shyam agrawal^ aged about son of Shri SurajEial Agrawal, resident of Sadar Bazar^Dhamtarl^ (MP). Versus EESPONDBSiTS s 1» State of Madhya Pradesh, Ihrough Secretary^ Labour DepartMent^ Government of Madhya pradesh; Vallabh Bhawan,Bhopal (IIP), 'i^..K^M^ i" . ' /j """"' "^- IJ 2- Presiding Officer, Labour Court^ Baipur. h 3- Assistant, Labour Commissioner^ fiaipur. 4- Labour Commissioner^ Madhya Pradesh^ Indore, (Pv 5° Chhatisgarh ohrimik Sangh, Ihrough Secretary^ Shr^, Soop Chand Chandrakar, Ifll+G l/5l,Amdi Nagar, Bhilai, District Dui-g (MP). T^ XI-IiC-22 'STT^T ^T ! f^W 3Tlt¥T "^TI -y^- -^qpTR^^ '^fhm^, ^. ^...W.E...l*3.l/QO....^ ^ •^^ST' 31T^? '^^I^R ^f^I, 22•lt•2001 t Shri Gautam S ^f^t^fPT ^TR^t' ^ feT^ Tf^?K ^T 'SIT^R"'BTTS^T Shri H^B<»Agr4wa1 fo^ the petitioner^ haduri for the State^ shri R^K<»Gup^a for the respondent no^S^ The petitione^ is aggrieved by the refej&ence alreacbf made before the l.abour Court by the State on j 15»1^99^ Preliminary obj^ctiontaken on behalf of the respondent is that since the matter is already pendin^ before the labour Court^ jthe^jpetitioner should agitate ^^j^ 9 AL^^L C^l4^ ' this point^flt is submit^ed that it is premature for the petitioner to approach t^is Court before the issue as regards jurisdiction is ^ecided by the labour Court^ Mr^H^B^Agrawa^L counsel for the petitioner subw raits that since tbe jurisdiction of the labour court is questionedlsi by the petit^Loner^the labour court can not decide the issue of juri^diction^ In my view th^t is not the correct position of law, Jurisdiction can any forum or court where be certainly raised before Ow the matter 1s pending^ No doubt^ if aggrieved by the find|Lng of the labour court.the peti- <c€^T~ tioner should pursue the| ^^^^^^^^.^...^-^ matter before the^ 'T.'.T""1"""""""""'"""'"'—" ^ ^TI^T^T f^Nr^T^T ^lNT^TfN ^?T'q513R (tS<=ti^<^ ) >2.» 3:H^T'^H^RT5fin In the result.this pe] direct the labour Court two months fr^n the date Tfae petitioner order before tbe learned C<iC^today® tb -^zjf^q^ iTTO^r ^ft^ ^<^K ^" ^rf^T^ 3T^F .ifcion is dismissed* I would decide fche matter mot later than ^f recei^t of this order^ shall produce a copy of this pLabour Court, Sd/- Chief Justice '-^