1 wp2242.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2242 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.D. Sonwane holding for Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2011 Labour Court found departmental enquiry vitiated on 18th February, 2010 while answering preliminary point. The petitioner-employer questioned it by filing Revision Application under Section 44 of the M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act. Learned Member of Industrial Court found that the said Revision was not maintainable. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of this Court reported at "2001 LIC 1536" ( M.S.R.T.C. V/s Nanuram Verma). 2. It is apparent that as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment reported at "AIR 1975 S.C. 1900" ( The Cooper Engineering Ltd., V/s P.P. Mundhe) such challenge has to wait till final adjudication 2 wp2242.11 of controversy by the Labour Court. I therefore, do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. With liberty to petitioner to raise his challenge again before appropriate Forum in accordance with law, present Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp2242.11