IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2011 / 22ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 15739 of 2011(N) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- NIMMIMOL,AGED 22 YEARS, AKKILETHUMELEMURIYIL,PUNTHALA.P.O,VENMONEY, ALLAPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADSV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE,KULANADA BRANCH REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF MANAGER,KULANADA, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER,STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE,KULANADA BRANCH, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT - 689 645. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER,STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE,KOTTAYAM - 686 501. BY ADVS. SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 15739/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF LETTER NO.AGMIV/K DATED 04/05/2011 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06/06/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF CIRCULAR NO.RPCD.PLNFS.BC.NO.83/06 12/05/2000-01 DATED APRIL 28, 2001 ISSUED BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.15739 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed stating that the petitioner is a 4th year B.Tech degree student of Udaya School of Engineering in Tamil Nadu. According to the petitioner, she applied for an education loan of Rs.4 lakhs and it was sanctioned. It is her case that however she was disbursed only an amount of Rs.1,95,000/-, it is alleged that the Bank has refused to disburse the balance amount. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to direct the respondents to disburse the educational loan for her higher studies. 2. In the writ petition apart from the allegation that the petitioner has sought a loan of Rs.4 lakhs, the petitioner has not produced any material to substantiate the said contention. On the other hand, along with the statement filed on behalf of respondents 1 to 3, they have produced the loan application made by the petitioner, as Annexure II. W.P(C) No.15739 of 2011 2 This document shows that the amount of loan applied by the petitioner is Rs.2,05,000/-. It is also stated that out of this amount, Rs.1,95,000/- has been disbursed. Thus on the materials available there is nothing to show that the petitioner applied for Rs.4 lakhs or that any amount is refused to be disbursed by the Bank. In these circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC ab JUDGE