HIG;H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITigNIS ) No, 33W of2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Raj Kumari Yadav Aee about 46 year, Astt. Teaeher W/o Shri Basant Kumar Yadav Priniary Girls School Mana Basti Block -Dharsiva, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Govt. of Chhattissarh Through Secretarv, Tribal Wetfare Departinent & Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Distt. Education Qfficer Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Treasury, Aecounts & Pension Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRITJ'ETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST1TUT10N OF INDIA.; Sinsle Bench : Hon'Me Justtce Shri Sattsh K. Agmhotri. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Sia-i Y.S.Thakur, Govt Advocate fortSie State/respondents. OKDER (Passed on 20Bl day of June, 2007) 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that fhe fact and question of law mvolved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durj and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvertthe said submission. f In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Go\'t. of Chhattwgarh and another) and other coniiected matters, decided by this Court on 15- 12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by tfae Secretary. Board of Secondarv E.dueation. Bhonal and the prospectus of Diploma in Educafioo Examination, it was clarifies that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Trainiag Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed, Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The Sfate Govt. ofChhattvsgarh and another) (Supra). 3. Accordingly, the wi-it petition is allowed in terms ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge Asnit