Ste". 1 i'v^^ .0- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 208 of2009 PETmONERS : 1. Ma3<han Lal Nishad, Aee about 40 years, Astt. Teachei- S/o Sliri MaiAgu Rain Nisliad Govt. primary Sch. Makrdikhuna Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 2. Daine Say Baghel Age about 41 years, Astt. Teacher, S/o Shri Dava Ram Baghel Govt. Hr. Sec. School Pakhanjur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 3. Girdhar Ram Sinha Age about 44 year, Astt. Teacher, S/o Sliri Shiv Rani SiiAa, Govt. Hr. See. School Lakhanpuri, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 4. Laxmaii Siiigli Kawade Age about 39 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shir Ram Singh Kawade Govt. Hr Sec. School Lakliatipuri, Distt. Kankei- (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Throueh: The Seci-etary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Comniissioner, Public Iiistruction Directoral Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Tlie Distt. Education Officer Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 4. Sliri K.P.Khare Upper Division Teacher, Middle School Govindpur, Annupuma Para, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CpNSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Safish K. Asnihotri. J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 3. 2. (Passed on 29m day of April, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on iiistructions, submits that the petitioners do not want to contest this petition on merits at ttus stage, however, fhey be permitted to make a representation to the authorities concemed, which may be considered and decided in accordance wifh law, as expeditiously as possible. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/'respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, a representation is made, fhe same shall be eonsidered and decided in aceordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. In view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, nofhinm survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 1