IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21059 of 2011 Satish Yadav, Son of Late Judge Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 20.7.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/s.302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 5.7.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.19273 of 2010 but was granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case was not bifurcated for the said purpose. It has been submitted that four accused persons have been jointly charged on 15.2.2011 and, therefore, the petitioner deserves bail in response to the earlier order. Considering such submission, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned 3rd F.T.C., Bhojpur at Ara in connection with S.T.No.84 of 2011 arising out of Narayanpur P.S. case No.5 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Sunil Kumar Yadav, cousin of the petitioner and the other will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving - 2 - genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )