IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22821 of 2008 RAGHUNANDAN MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 18.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case for the offences registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith three named accused persons made firing over the husband of the informant while they were coming on cycle. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegations are false and petitioner has been implicated in this case on account of previous enmity, as stated in the FIR. It is further submitted that on the alleged date of occurrence he was not present since he was attending the meeting before the Regional Labour Commissioner, Lucknow, as per the certificate dated 17.04.2008, as contained in Annexure-3. Learned counsel for the State, on perusal of the case diary as well as the postmortem report, submits that as per the allegations in the FIR, as supported by the postmortem report, two fire-arm injuries have been found on the body of the deceased. In view of the allegations made in the FIR, as also the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)