IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13424 of 2011 Ram Sakal Ray, S/O Sri Yugeshwar Ray, Resident of Village- Mustafapur, Panchayat- Mustafapur, P.S.-Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Samastipur. 3. The Block Development Officer, Bibhutipur, Distt.-Samastipur. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 25.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 04.08.2011, contained in Memo No. 1895, whereby the Block Development Officer, Bibhutipur directed the petitioner to refund the value of undistributed rice at A.P.L. rate supplied in the year 2005-06 under Food for Work Scheme. The petitioner in paragraph 4 of this application stated that he lifted 216.84 quintals of rice in the year 2005-06 which he could not distribute, as no permit was issued for the same. 3. The petitioner submits that in the year 2008 he was directed to deposit the price of undistributed rice at B.P.L. rate and subsequently he deposited Rs.25,000/- towards partial payment of undistributed rice. 4. The impugned notice contained in Memo no.1895 dated 04.08.2011 would be treated as show-cause to which the petitioner would make his detailed representation to the authority concerned within four weeks from today and the same would dispose of within two months thereafter. No coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner subject to deposit of 15 % of undistributed rice at the rate of 10 per kg. The petitioner 2 would be at liberty either to deposit the value of the rice or rice in its present form. 5. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of. Uday/ ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)