:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION CRI. REV. APPLICATION NO. 261 OF 2004. Smt. Kalawati Vilas Gaikwad ..Applicant. Versus. Shri. Vilas Bandu Gaikwad. ..Respondent. --- Mr. Setumadhav @ Pramod J. Pawar for the applicants. Ms. Seema Sernaik for respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2005. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. FEBRUARY 7, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. From the judgment it is revealed that the applicant is having her shop which is looked after by the applciant and her son. It shows that she has ample income. We have gone through the judgement. We find no reason to interfere in it. Therefore, this criminal revision application is rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :srp/2005/