IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 76 of 2009 Vipin Bihari Lal ………… Petitioner Versus Union of India and others .…...……. Respondents Present: Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Standing Counsel (Union of India) for respondent No.1. Mr.Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 4. Ms. Beena Pande, Standing Counsel (State of U.P.) for respondent Nos. 3 & 5. Coram : Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, Chief Justice Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Judge Date of Decision : 09.03.2011 Barin Ghosh, C. J. (Oral) It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the petitioner has joined the State of Uttar Pradesh, the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) ( Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 09.03.2011 P. Singh