IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24648 of 2008 MD. NAFISH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Renewing the prayer for bail under Section-376 of I.P.C., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that D.N.A. report does not support the allegations. Learned counsel for the informant opposing the application submits that he has filed an application disputing the validity of D.N.A. report itself before the court below. Be that as it may, this Court considers the negative report as sufficient ground to enlarge him on bail. The objection of the informant to the same is a matter to be more appropriately considered during trial. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, 1st, Katihar in Complaint Case No.1674/05, Tr. No.16/07. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )