IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 541 OF 2008 ANTONIO BRAGANZA AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus PEDRO JOAO BRAGANZA AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. M. B. D'costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. Abreu Lobo, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shivan Desai, Advocate for the respondent no.1 to 3. Coram:- SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. Date:- 15th April, 2009 P.C. This writ petition can be disposed of by passing directions alone since the order that is challenged is an order of dismissal of an application with regard to the issue of witness summons for production of records of Unit Trust of India. The application has been dismissed on the ground that the specific officer of UTI was not summoned. Thereafter, the plaintiff in the suit closed the case. The plaintiff who is the petitioner herein seeks to have the records of the UTI produced. The relevant officer of the UTI shall produce the records as mentioned in the witness summons issued by the Judge. The officer is only the witness for production of the documents. Hence the closure of the petitioners' case does not matter. I am told that a preliminary decree has been passed. The documents produced by the relevant officer of the UTI shall be considered at the time of making accounts. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. SMT. R. S. DALVI, J. lh/.