1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4344 OF 2009 Said Alimastan Shaikh .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Shekhar Bhise for the applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 17th November, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. By this application, the applicant prays that this court may pass the order that two sentences imposed on the applicant be allowed to run concurrently. 3. The learned A.P.P. objects the prayer and submits that the applicant was convicted in two different cases, one by the Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No. 280/PW/2006 and another by RMA appln4344-09.sxw 2 the Sessions Court of Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 329 of 2006. Two offenses involved were entirely different and not connected with each other and the trials were separate and convictions are also separate. 4. In view of this, the prayer of the applicant cannot be granted. The application is rejected. 5. The learned counsel for the applicant shall inform the order to the applicant who is in jail. (D.G. KARNIK, J.) RMA appln4344-09.sxw 3 RMA appln4344-09.sxw