IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 3585 of 2008 CM No. 3587 of 2008 and RSA No. 1209 of 2008 Date of Decision: 21.11. 2008 Rama ...... Appellant Versus Gian Kaur ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 3585 of 2008 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of two days in refiling the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No. 3587 of 2008 No grounds have been shown that this application conforms to the requirements of Order XLI Rule 27 C.P.C. Consequently, the same is dismissed. RSA No. 1209 of 2008 This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondents for eviction of the RSA No.1209 of 2008 appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to deny that the findings regarding the ownership of the respondents and the fact of the property having been let out to the appellant are questions of fact. He has not been able to persuade me that these findings are either perverse or can be held to be not arising from the material on the record. Learned lower Appellate Court has primarily relied upon two facts, (i) that in an earlier suit the appellant himself described the respondent as wife of Kartar Singh and (ii) the contention of the appellant that the property was let out to him by the ex wife of Kartar Singh in 1984 could not hold water since by that time that lady had already obtained divorce from Kartar Singh and he was also living. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 21, 2008 sunita