IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1341 OF 2009. WRIT PETITION NO. 1341 OF 2009. WRIT PETITION NO. 1341 OF 2009. WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 172 of 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION No. 172 of 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION No. 172 of 2009 Mohol Taluka Sahakari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors ..Petitioners. Vs. The Asstt Charity Commissioner ..Respondent. Mr N. P. Shimpi, Advocate for the petitioner. for the respondent. Mr P. P. Kakade, A.G.P. for the Respondent. Mr Surel Shah, Advocate for Intervener present. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 22nd January,2009. DATED: 22nd January,2009. DATED: 22nd January,2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the petition. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 4.10.2008 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Solapur, Region Solapur holding that he has jurisdiction over the Trust under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the impugned order is bad in law and liable to be set aside. He, thus, submits that there cannot be two legislatures governing the same entity. In his submission, if the impugned order is held to be good then in that event the Charity Commissioner shall exercise jurisdiction under the Bombay Public Trust Act and also the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. He, thus, submits that the petitioner would be subjected to a control by dual authorities which is not authorised in law. Hence the impugned order is bad in law. 3. The learned counsel for the Intervener appearing in the matter, has brought to my notice the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of A.D.R. vs. Joint Charity Commissioner, A.D.R. vs. Joint Charity Commissioner, A.D.R. vs. Joint Charity Commissioner, M.S. 1972 Mh.LJ 571, M.S. 1972 Mh.LJ 571, M.S. 1972 Mh.LJ 571, wherein the Company Registered under the Companies Act, was also registered under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act and such registration was held good. He, thus, submits that the impugned order is in consonance with the law laid down by this Court. 4. Having heard both parties and having examined the impugned order in the light of the judgment of this Court no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. 5. In the result, the petition is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. 6. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, the civil application does not survive. Same is disposed of. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)