THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.353 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.23047 of 2009, complaining of inaction on the part of the respondents 1 and 2 for the alleged unauthorized construction made by the 3rd respondent. The writ petition was disposed of, on 14-12-2009, directing that, in case the 3rd respondent has submitted an application for regularization, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, duly considering the objection, that may be raised by the petitioner, and if no such application is pending, the 2nd respondent shall initiate action against the unauthorized construction. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondents did not implement the directions issued by this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2, and learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before this Court, a copy of the proceedings dated 22-03-2010, issued by the 2nd respondent. It is mentioned that the application filed by the 3rd respondent for regularization was rejected on the ground that the construction was made subsequent to 15-12-2007. So far as the other direction, as regards action against the unauthorized construction is concerned, it is mentioned that the 3rd respondent filed W.P.No.15639 of 2009, and that an interim order was passed in W.P.M.P.No.20567 of 2009. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that there was any wilful disobedience on the part of the 2nd respondent. It is felt that the petitioner has to await the outcome of W.P.No.15639 of 2009. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner herein has got himself impleaded in W.P.No.15639 of 2009. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed. It is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedies, depending upon the outcome of Writ Petition No.15639 of 2009. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.08-06-2010. KO