THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 598 of 2009. Km. Jyoti Fartyal D/O Sri Sher Singh Fartyal. … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder for the State-respondents. Date August 27, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Restoration Application No. 710 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on restoration application and perused the record. This writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 2-8-2010. The petitioner has moved the restoration application to recall the order of dismissal dated 2-8-2010. The application is duly supported by an affidavit. Grounds shown in the affidavit, accompanying the restoration application, are sufficient to recall the dismissal order dated 2-8-2010. The restoration application is allowed. The dismissal order dated 2-8-2010 is hereby recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original number. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant the benefits of Government Orders dated 15-5-2006 and 28-6-2006 to the petitioner and absorb her as Shiksha Mitra in district Nainital. The 2 petitioner has also sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the honorarium to the petitioner on the post of Shiksha Mitra in view of the said Government Orders from the date from which the Education Guarantee Scheme Centre of petitioner was upgraded to Primary School Lalitpur Beria, Block Ramnagar. The petitioner claims that he had passed intermediate examination in the year 2003 and subsequently, she completed graduation degree course in the year 2006. The petitioner also claims to have been appointed as Shiksha Anudeshak in EGS Centre Lalitpur Beria, Blcok Ramnagar, district Nainital, by the Village Education Committee and since 1-7-2006, she had continuously worked in the said EGS Centre. The said EGS Centre was upgraded to primary school and a direction was issued to the Block Education Officer to adjust one of the Shiksha Acharya as Shiksha Mitra as per G.O. dated 28-6-2006 by the District Project Officer concerned. The grievance of the petitioner is that the benefit of the G.O. dated 28-6-2006 has not been extended to the petitioner and she has not been paid any honorarium as admissible to Shiksha Mitra. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Brief Holder for the State. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner has already made representation to absorb her as Shiksha Mitra in view of the aforesaid Government Order and the Block Education Officer Ramnagar also recommended the case of the petitioner to the Additional District Education Officer (Basic) Nainital for absorption of the petitioner in the vacant post of Shiksha Mitra. The petitioner has also annexed Government Order dated 28-6-2006 (Annexure-6 to the petition) to show that the State Government had directed the authorities concerned that theShiksha 3 Acharya/Shiksha Anudeshak working in the EGS Centre, which are upgraded to Primary School, shall be deemed as Shiksha Mitra and they would be paid honorarium @ Rs. 4000/- per month. In the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation before the authority concerned for adjustment in the said Primary school or any other Primary School as Shiksha Mitra. If the representation is made, the Authority concerned/Additional District Education shall decide the same expeditiously by a speaking and reasoned order, considering the prevailing Government Orders and the recommendation already made by the Block Education Officer, Ramnagar (Annexure-7 to the writ petition). With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP