IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45036 of 2007 1. HITAISHI BUILDCON PVT.LTD. THRU.RAKESH CHANDRA MALHOTRA 2. RAKESH CHANDRA MALHOTRA 3. MADHU MALHOTRA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRITISH GAURAV ----------- 2. 19.01.2009 The petitioners claim to be a builder and its officials. They agreed to sell flat to Opposite party no. 2. Differences between them led to filing of a case before the District Consumer Form at Patna registered as Case No. 95 of 2007. It is the contention of the petitioners that in the proceedings before the Consumer Form the petitioners offered the possession of the flat as also the keys thereto. The proceedings under the Consumer Act were disposed off accordingly. In light of the aforesaid development, the petitioners and Opposite party no. 2/complainant have filed a compromise petition before the court below signed by both of them. The offences alleged in the complaint case no. 2893 C of 2006 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Patna filed by Opposite party no. 2 are compoundable. If the parties have filed a compromise petition, the court below is required to consider the same appropriately in accordance with law and dispose it off by a reasoned and speaking order. Let the same be done within a maximum period of six weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. This application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)