1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.8.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL.O.P.(MD).Nos.10245 & 10246 of 2011 CRL.O.P(MD)No.10245 of 2011: 1.Kondaiyan 2.Pommuthai 3.Karthick 4.Radha 5.Velmani 6.Dhandapani : Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1 to 6 Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Aravakurichi Police Station, Karur District. :Respondent/Complainant 2.R.Nagalakshmi @ Ramya :Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER IN CRL.O.P(MD)No.10245 of 2011: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in Crime No.496 of 2010 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Aravakurichi Police Station, Karur and quash the same. For Petitioners: Mr.S.Gokul Raj For Respondents: Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 :Mr.Dhandapani-Party in person CRL.O.P(MD)No.10246 of 2011: 1.Dhandapani 2.Perumal Naicker 3.Pommuthai 4.Kondaiyan 5.Velmani 6.Nagalakshmi : Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1to6 Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karur, Karur District. :Respondent/Complainant 2.Ramya @ R.Nagalakshmi :Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER IN CRL.O.P(MD)No.10246 of 2011: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in Crime No.9 of 2011 on the file of the All Women Police Station, Karur and quash the same. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 For Petitioners: Mr.Dhandapani(Party in person) For Respondents: Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 :Ms.Nagalakshmi(Party in person) COMMON ORDER Today, even though the Advocates are not present, the petitioners 1 to 6 as well as the second respondent are present, in both the petitions, before this Court and they have filed a Memo of Compromise and in that, the second respondent herein gave a complaint against those petitioners under Sections 147,294(b), 323 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.496 of 2010 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.10245 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and under Sections 498(A),406, 506(i)IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act in Crime No.9 of 2011 on the file of respondent police in Crl.O.P(MD)No.10246 of 2011. 2.Now the matter is settled out of Court and they are living happily and hence, the second respondent has no objection to quash the same and the second respondents, in both the petitions, do not want to pursue the matter. 3.Recording the submissions made by both sides as well as the Memo of Compromise received by this Court to the effect that the matter has been settled out of Court, these Criminal Original Petitions are allowed and both the F.I.Rs are quashed. Encl : Copy of memo compromise Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To, 1.The Inspector of Police, Aravakurichi Police Station, Karur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karur, Karur District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +2CC TO MR.S.GOKULRAJ, ADVOCATE SR.28312, 28313 Gsr : SR : 07.09.2011 : 2p/6c CRL.O.P.(MD).Nos.10245 & 10246 of 2011 19.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/