IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.916 of 2009 JAI NANDAN MAHTO SON OF LATE SARYUG MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GOPALPUR CHANDWARA, P.S. AURAI, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3 BHRIGU NATH UPADHYAY, DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. BALI RAM PRASAD, REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION),DARBHANGADIVISION, DARBHANGA.......................... .............. . OPP., PARTIES ----------------------- 3 10-2-2010 Naresh Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. A long and detailed order contained in annexure-A to the show cause has been passed by the concerned committee in compliance of the order of the writ court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has not been passed after giving opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and it is not an order in accordance with law because the relevant facts have allegedly not been considered objectively. The aforesaid issue cannot be appropriately dealt with under contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that if so advised, he may challenge annexure- A before appropriate forum in accordance with law. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) - 2 -