IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3673 OF 2010 Prashant U. Sanap .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents Mr. S.S. Redekar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for State. Mr. Yogesh Rawool, Advocate for respondent no.2 Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 12th January, 2011 P.C. 1. This petition is filed to challenge the order dated 3rd December 2010, by which the learned Additional Sessions Court, Vasai rejected the application filed by the applicant for his discharge as surety for respondent no.2, the accused in C.R. II/55/2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13 (1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act. The applicant states that though at the time of hearing of the application, he had kept repsondent no. 2 present in the Court, who was willing to furnish another local surety, the Sessions Court rejected the application on the ground that there was no reason specified for withdrawal of surety. The learned counsel for respondent no.2 states that he will furnish another local surety within a period of two weeks from today to the satisfaction of the Sessions Court. On such surety being furnshed, the petitoner be discharged as surety for respondent no.2. With this order, the petition is dismissed. (Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J)