:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.1309 OF 1990 Empress Tin Factory Pvt.Ltd. & anr. .. Petitioners v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents Ms.Meena Doshi for the petitioners. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17th June, 2005 P.C. Ms.Meena Doshi, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite her best efforts, she has not been able to seek any instructions from the petitioners. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners is fair enough to submit that the constitutional validity of sections 25(O) and 25(R) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been upheld by the Supreme Court and in this connection, she has nothing further to say. 3. For want of instructions and in view of the fact that vires of sections 25(O) and 25(R) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have already been :2: upheld and the learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the said relief, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. We order accordingly. Rule is discharged. No costs. (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, J.) J.) J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.)