IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 16.08.2011 Crl.W.P.No.1452 of 2011 Mehar Singh …Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK Present: Mr. H.P.S.Aulakh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shubhra Singh, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Ms. Shubhra Singh has filed short reply by way of affidavit of Mr. Chander Parkash, District Magistrate, Rohtak, pointing out that none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to furnish the surety bonds and that the order of furlough has since been expired on account of expiry of six months. After going through the averments made in the petition as well as in the affidavit, we find it difficult to accept that having obtained an order of furlough, the petitioner shall not furnish surety bonds. However, without going any further into the said aspect, we order that the competent authority shall accept the surety bonds on behalf of the petitioner as and when submitted within a period of one month. With the said direction, the present petition stands disposed of. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 16.08.2011 (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) Vimal JUDGE