IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5840 of 2011 PRAMOD MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Although the petitioner is not named in the FIR but it appears from submission of the parties as well as impugned order that the alleged motorcycle has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused, Rafique Ansari has already been granted privilege of bail and the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 12.08.2010. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Mairwan P.S. Case No. 134 of 2010 stands rejected. However, if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six months from the date of receipt of the order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)