IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1180 of 2009(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. RONY VARGHESE, AGED 22, S/O.M.V.VARGHESE, MANGALATH HOUSE, KURISUMOOD P.O, CHAGANCHERRY, KOTTAYAM. 2. RAMJITH R. AGED 22, S/O.G.RAMADASAN NAIR, SIVAKRIPA, ARAMADA P.O, THIRUMALA, TRIVANDRUM DT. 3. ANTU EAPEN THOMAS, AGED 22,S /O P.C.THOMAS COCHIN SHIPYARD QUARTES, PANAMBILLY NAGAR, COCHIN 682 036. 4. K.ARAVIND AGED 22, S/O.K.RAVEENDRAN, KEERAMKULANGARA VARIYAM, PATTIKKADU P.O, TRISSUR. 5. MINTA PAUL, AGED 22, D/O.K.J.PAULOSE, KULANGATTIL HOUSE, KOLENCHERY P.O, ERNAKULAM. 6. ABHILASH JOHN, AGED 27, S/O.E.D.JOHN, CHINCHU 1/4094, WESTHILL, KOZHIKODE DT. 7. SHAN J. AGED 22, S/O JAHANGEER, BREEZE LAND, THEKKUMKARA, PULLICHIRA P.O, KOLLAM 691304. 8. ASHISH KURIAN, AGED 22, S/OK.F.KURIAN, KUTTIKKATTU HOUSE, GREEN PARK APT. AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. WPC NO.1180/09 -2- 9. RAKESH BABU, AGED 22, S/O SURESH BABU, ALATTU HOUSE, MUPPATHADAM P.O, ALUVA 683 110. 10. PRASEETHA U. MENON AGED 22, D/OK.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, KIZHAKKEPALAKATH MANICKAMANDIRAM HOUSE, KONATHUKUNNU P.O. 680123. 11. SHINOS P.M. AGED 22, S/OP.A.MEERAKUTTY PANIKKARUKUDY HOUSE, CHELAMATTOM OKKAL P.O.683550. 12. KANNAN A.G., AGED 22, S/O.V.ASOKAN, NANDANAM, VIKAS NAGAR, PALATHANAM P.O, KOLLAM 21. 13. ANU JOSEPH, AGED 22, D/O JOSEPH, KAZHUTHUVEETIL HOUSE, VELLIAPPALLY P.O, PALA 686574. BY ADV. SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN SRI.M.N.SANJITH SRI.JAISON JOSEPH SRI.P.S.BASTIN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYM REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 1180 OF 2009 (M) ==================== Dated this the 12th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are MBA students. Exts.P1 to P13 are the pay-in-slips evidencing payment of the revaluation fee and Exts.P1(a) to P13(a) are the applications made by them for revaluation of the papers mentioned therein. The complaint in this writ petition is regarding the delay on the part of the University in revaluing the answer papers and declaring their results on that basis. Petitioners submit that as a result of the delay, they will not be in a position to appear for the campus recruitment. Having regard to the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, I dispose of this writ petition directing that if the applications referred to above submitted by the petitioners are otherwise in order, the respondents shall complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp