IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 5633 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.04.2011 Harnek Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Manohar Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for respondent No. 4 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking direction for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent No. 3 at the instance respondent No. 4. Reply by way of affidavit of Arshdeep Singh, PPS, DSP, Nabha, District Patiala on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. In para 2 of the said reply, it is submitted that complaint dated 10.02.2011 against the petitioner was given to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala by Harchand Singh, respondent No. 2, alleging therein, that the petitioner used abusive language and tried to kill respondent No. 4 as they were armed with weapons. It is not disputed by Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab, on instructions from ASI Gurjant Singh, that as on date, no FIR is registered against the petitioner. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with direction that in case, any FIR is registered against the petitioner or he is wanted by the police in any complaint filed by respondent No. 4 as above, two days advance notice will be given to him. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 21.04.2011 mohan