IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2008 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1930 WA.No. 1213 of 2008 ---------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) No.16409/2008 DATED 3-6-2008) APPELLANT: PETITIONERS: --------------------------------------- 1. JULI JOSE.K.J., KAITHARAN HOUSE, PANDIKUDY, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM. 2. C.M.MARY VIMA, CHENNAT HOUSE, KOLLASSERY ROAD KONAM, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6. 3. RINU PAUL.K., KANNANKERIL HOUSE, KUMBALANGI P.O., WATER TANK ROAD, KOCHI-7. 4. DEEPA.A.G., ATHIRUKUZHIYIL HOUSE, E.S.I. ROAD, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6. 5. ANNA.M.E., MULAKKARA HOUSE, NEAR MALAT BAKERY, NORTH KUMBALANGI P.O., KOCHI-7. 6. REMYA.T.R., THAZHUPPI PARAMBIL HOUSE, KUMBALANGI P.O., KOCHI-7. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. W.A.NO.1213/2008 -2- 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING TRUSTEE, SREE DHARMA PARIPALANA YOGAM, SREE DHARMA PARIPALANA YOGAM SCHOOL OF T.T.C., SREE NARAYANA NAGAR, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6. R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------ W.A.No.1213 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 11th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT A.K.Basheer, J. The appellants who are stated to be pursuing TTC Course in Sree Dharma Paripalana Yogam School at Palluruthy have preferred this writ appeal challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge rejecting their prayer to declare that they are entitled to complete the said course on the strength of the admission given to them based on Exts.P2 and P3. 2. It was noticed by the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition that the appellants did not have the requisite minimum marks for admission to the TTC Course. 3. Having perused the impugned judgment and other relevant materials on record, we do not find any reason to interfere with the finding entered by the learned Single Judge. Moreover, in Ext.P9 judgment, a Division Bench of this Court, headed by the Honourable Chief Justice, had already held that those students who did not have the requisite minimum marks for admission in the TTC Course cannot aspire for permission to continue the course. The writ appeal fails, and accordingly it is dismissed. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE MS