IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2791 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 11, 2011 Gurdeep Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.K.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner concededly is a witness only. Whether the application moved by a witness for additional evidence would be maintainable or not is doubtful. It is for the prosecution or the defence or for the Court to see what evidence is required in the interest of justice and proper decision of the case. Witness apparently would be interested only for giving his version. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in the impugned order passed by the Court, which has apparently allowed the prayer of the petitioner though partly. Dismissed. November 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE