w.P. c. No. ya Q} OF 2011 Vijay Swarnkar son of Shri Sadhuram, aged about-56 years R/o Villag€~ Sariya, Tahsil— Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C‘GJ PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS l./ State of Chhattisgarh through Secretéry Nagriya Prashan Awam Vikas Bibhag, 7’ D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 4 2. Nayab Tahsildar, Sariya Tahsil— Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). Chief h Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sariya, Distt. Raigarh CG WRIT PETITION . UNDER ARTICLE 225 TIM ‘ I rm» CONSTITUTION OF _ INDIé w g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri M.K. Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents and respondent/ Nagar Panchayat - Saria. O R D E R (Passed on this 15th day of December, 201 1) 1‘ At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the respondent authorities have decided to withdraw the impugned notice dated 18-11—2011 (Annexure -— P/1), as no sufficient time was given, and if necessary fresh notice shall be issued affording proper opportunity of hearing to the respective person to put fonNard their case, if any. 2. ln view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- SATISH K. ANGNmOTm Judge WRIT PETITION (C) NO.7077 OF 2011 PETITIONER Vijay Swarnkar Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others