IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.230 OF 2008 Mrs. Sandhya Pramod Godse ...Petitioner. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Sagar Joshi, adv. For the Petitioner. Mr. A.I.I.Patel, AGP. For the Respondent No.1. Shri Shankar S. Deshmukh i/by Sanjeev J. Rairkar, advs. for the Respondent No.2. Shri A.M.Joshi, adv. for the respondent no.3 CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : APRIL 22, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 In Writ Petition No.1998/07 by the order dated 3rd May, 2007, this Court had stayed the order passed by the management to declare the petitioner as surplus. After that the petitioner has been reinstated. This contempt petition was filed alleging that salary has not been paid to the petitioner. In fact, there is no order passed by this Court directing management or education officer about payment of salary or arrears. Therefore, question of committing breach of such order does not arise and contempt petition does not lie. - 2 - 2 Petition stands dismissed. 3 However, petitioner shall be at liberty to take appropriate steps for the recovery of the salary amount. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)