1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.273 OF 2008 Narsingh R. & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. Union of India & Anr. .... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.275 OF 2008 N.K. Nagwekar & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. Union of India & Anr. .... Respondents AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.23 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.276 OF 2008 S.R. Pandey & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. Union of India & Anr. .... Respondents Shri T.R. Yadav for the Applicants. S/Shri Deepak Rai i/b Suresh Kumar for Respondent No.2. 2 CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 2, 2010 P.C: Considering the pendency of older matters, particularly contempt petitions of the year 1992, the prayer in the present applications cannot be considered. The applications are rejected. The applicants may renew their request in January, 2011. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)