IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.6839 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: MAY 06, 2009 Neena Rani .....PETITIONER Versus The Punjabi University, Patiala and another ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Mr.R.K. Chopra,Sr. Advocate, with Ms.Maninder, Advocate, for the petitioner. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Since three months' contract period of teaching has already expired, learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage the petitioner does not want to press this petition. Dismissed as not pressed at this stage. However, it will be open for the petitioner to approach this Court if in her place some other teacher/lecturer on contract or ad hoc basis is appointed. May 06, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE