IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2008 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 206 of 2008(M) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.13981/2003 .................... PETITIONER --------------------------- ABDUL ASHRAF (LEGAL HEIR OF LATE K.A.MARIAMMA, MALANAD PERFUMERY INDUSTRIES) TAJ NAGAR, NAINARMOOLA, KLAMPADY P.O. KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (LB) INVESTIGATION BRANCH, AGRL.INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX, KANNUR. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF AGRL.INCOME TAX AND SALES TAX, KANNUR. 3. BOARD OF REVENUE (TAXES) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR) TALUK OFFICE, KASARGOD. BY G.P. SRI.K.P.PRADEEP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.206 of 2008 in O.P. No.13981 of 2003 .................................................................... Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2008. ORDER Even though there is no ground to interfere with the judgment in review petition, I feel some modification is called for atleast in the cause title because petitioner in the O.P. is no more. The review petitioner is substituted as petitioner in the O.P. Besides this, petitioner is granted time till 30.3.2008 to clear the arrears in terms of judgment and only if payment is made as above, the petitioner will get the benefit of waiver of interest under the judgment. The review petition is disposed of as above. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms