IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 23293 of 2003 Between: M. Sanjeeva Rao, S/o M. Satyanarayana Rao, S.B.S.M. Junior College, Khajipet, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner and Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner and Director of Intermediate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 4 The Correspondent, S.B.S.M. Junior College, Khajipet, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not considering and passing appropriate orders on the proposals submitted by the 4th respondent dated 15-03- 2003 and my representation dated 17-06-2003 for granting approval from the date of joining into duty by the petitioner as illegal, improper, unjust and arbitrary and in clear discrimination and further direct the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders on the proposals dated 15-03-2003 and my representation dated 17-6-2003 forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.UMAPATHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : None appeared The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: It is stated that the petitioner is working as a Junior Lecturer in Chemistry from 04-9- 1998 onwards in the fourth respondent college. The fourth respondent Junior College vide its letter 15-3-2003, submitted proposals to the first respondent for the appointment of junior lecturers in Chemistry. As the said proposals of the fourth respondent was not considered, the petitioner made a representation dated 17-6- 2003 before the first respondent to consider his service as junior lecturer in Chemistry from 4-9-1998 as recommended by 4th respondent college vide its letter dt.15-3-2003, but the said representation has not been disposed of so far. 2. A counter has been filed admitting the said proposals sent by 4th respondent and also the representation made by the petitioner. 3. Admittedly, the said representation of the petitioner was not considered and disposed of so far. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 17-6- 2003 in the light of the recommendations made by 4th respondent vide its letter dated 15.3.2003 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ 3/8/2004 V. ESWARAIAH, J Kvrk To 1 The Commissioner and Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner and Director of Intermediate Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 3 The Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 4 The Correspondent, S.B.S.M. Junior College, Khajipet, Kadapa District. 5. Two CCs to GP for Education, High Court of AP, Hyd. (OUT 6. Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court of AP, Hyd.(OUT)