IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2009 / 5TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17655 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHAKRADHARAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, THOTTUMKARA THAZHATHU, POOTHOTTA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.ASWIN GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. 4. VIJAYAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, THOTTUMKARA THAZHATH, PUNNAKKAVLI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, POOTHOTTA P.O., ERNAKULAM. MR.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC FOR KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.17655 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T When this case came up for orders today, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Board produced a copy of the order dated 08/05/2009 passed by the Additional District Magistrate over-ruling the objection raised by one Mr.Sasidharan for drawing the line to the premises of the 4th respondent and permitting the line to be drawn. It is stated that it is on the strength of this order that the line was proposed to be drawn. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this order was passed without notice to him. If that be so, it is up to him to challenge the said order and seek appropriate orders. Therefore, reserving the above liberty to the petitioner and leaving open all the contentions raised in the writ petition, the writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg