1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3978/2005 (Chand Mohammad & Ors. vs. Sate of Rajasthan & Anr.) Date of order : May 07, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.N.S.Khileri, for the petitioner. Mr.N.M.Lodha, Addl. Advcoate General. Mr.Tarun Joshi, for the respondent RPSC. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to re-evaluate the answer-sheets of the petitioner. Learned Additional Advocate General and the counsel appearing for the RPSC submit that the identical controversy came to be considered by this Court in Udai Singh vs. State of Rajasthan, S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2145/2005, which came to be decided vide order dt. 4.12.2006. While dismissing the writ petition, this Court held that there is no provision for re- evaluating the answer-sheets, which has been affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court. In this view of the matter I do not find any merit in the writ petition. 2 The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in the light of decision of this Court in Udai Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra). Stay petition also stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-