f- ^ ZN THE H33SH ©O^RT ©P J^DICATI?RE AS? BZLAgPUK (C.©.) WRIT RErCTlGNBrO. 8 2JS ©p2©04/ SET1i®EN '^ld.-y-l.%amar£'Dwive^i ,!§/©'•;3hri'l-IRamanaR<3lt»rivedi,'1 agei9 about 4©',years, R»si(3®nt©fNg>use N©•'821,•Sitatound, :®ti»afi r•(U«P.) PE'EITXONBK X N © 1 * The -St.at e',.,ii,,,;|hhat;tligari3^, Threugh .tfee .^seere'feary itei^rtmeAt:; e€;...»)m6/:-: ntral^a^ E>»K.s. gail^ling, Raipar » Tehsil and Bistrict mipur (GG) • 2» ' 3<h.e ms>erinten<ll@n't ©fSfelice^ ;:Satguja^ /' \^<;^ 3>. Distriet ,Mibik:ai>ur (CG)« ^ ~ - / qA'')'f ^. • 3* Stati@n; iteu'.a.^ :©ft4c@rB'^.llcse 'atafcien^,; . ^ ^ -. ^ ^ NY .Mty;^twali,-aArguj©,,DistriGt^M5capur^(ic©). ^ 4. (3^^, ^>.i@eriEffe.ent(|^t«'! .. ', • l\^y^)° ©is-fcriet^ail, saltanpur, ^^'x.<-'^>^ A .. Distrlct sultanpur (UP). ^y^'^^ ^.^^:"- ^^ '^- . '^ ^.-' ^ <<^ ^ / o ' , /:" HSBEAS CGRP® PETZTION X3NEtSK ARTlGEiR 226 KEAD Wl ^EIICL?? 32 0-? CONSTITUTION OW IWDI^ XI-HC-22 3TT^T^F)T {^;rN?3TT^T SbHl^iffl^T ^. 3^T ^NKri^, ^T{l<M^<o, RldW^i 3ll^l^5<ch^ flTO^rTgww"'"""'"'""" ^ 200 f^RS^ ^l^l^dlW^cf Divisioia Beaeb: Hon'ble Shrl A.K. Pataalk, Hoa*ble Shri Fakliruddin^J, 16-03-2005 Heard Mr. Shailendrsi pctitioncr aad Mr, Prarac|' Advocate General for tlie StaN This is a habeas SlnibTikar^n nwivedi, hrothet stated ro. fhe petition are ia Distiict Jail; Sultanpiir toefore the leanied Chief 26-12-2003 in comiection Sections 302, 201, 120-B Sections 25/27 of the Arrns) City KotwaM, Ambikapur Judicial Magistrate Sliublikaraii Uwivedi up eMended the remand iip fo 5|- his production buf he was the learaed Chief Judicial Mr, Dubey, leamed that under Section 167 ofthi M^gistrate hps to aiithori^ person lor aay particular CM^?<n41Ti ^i*4<nT^:te1c^t'<Rl^.l< ^3rf^T<3TI^?T I.J. 85 th^t Judlicial |Dubey, learaed counsel for fhe icjd Vcrma, lcaracd Additional of Chhattisgarh. c^rpus petition for release of e^ of tlie petitioner. The facts ^s Shubhkaran Dwivedi who was I (Uttar Pradesh) was produccd Magistrate, Ambikapur, on ^ith crime No.416/2003 under bf the Indi^in Pen^] Code ^nd Act registei^ed at PoHce Station ), Thercaftcr, thc Chicf tlie poUce remaad of fco 30-12-2003 and thereafter 1 -2004 and fixed 19- 1 -2004 for produced by the PoHce before (Ch^iattis.garh), saactibned 5|-1 n|ot Mafeistrate, coijinsel pe^iod for fhe petitioner submitted Code ofCrtminal Procedm'e, tlie the detention of an acciised and ia the abeeixce of such (^^fe^) XI-HC-22 3TT^T^)T {^rwan^r ^HT^^cT © 3^ "ill-qid^, diTf1y<|<^, fc|diy^< ^-^.15:>MQ;.i^5/dfol. w^^Tawr^"""""^^4""^^ 200 [c|<)<4 w^T^rrafR^cT --2- Magisttjate authorization by the 1 will be iUegal, He siibmits Shubhkai'au Dvvivedi was Magistrate only up to 19|- Shubhkai'ao. Dwivedi beyon(| On 17-1-2005, this C<^ 14-6-2004 sent. by tlie Sultaiiptii' (UUax' Piudesh)| Registiy of this Court t<| Superiiitendeiit, Distiict respondent No.4 askiag hinji which Shubhkaraa Dwivedi (Uttai' Piudesli) aiid pim 17-1-2005, the rcspondenl] copies of papers which been detamed ia custody atj several crixniaal cases. Mr, Dabey, leaiiied c| (hat m ttie event Shublil: custody m connection witl^ Uttar Pradesh, he niay n<|>i accoiint of Crizae No, 416J 120-B of I.P.C. aud Se.ctioi|is ffaough no order has shdw bedn <=M^I<n4i-i ^iH^iT^fte^^^K ^3Tf^T3TT^T ^ the detentiou of fhe accused fchat in tliis case tlie detentiori of tutliorised by llie Chief Judicial -1-2004 aiid any detention of 19-1-2004 ismegal. ^urt after perusiag the letter dated Superintendent^ District Jail, ^rcspoudeul No.4, du'ected llie send commuiiication to the ^il, Sultaiipur (Uttar Pradesh)- to send full facts of fhe case in. l©laiigiii^hing iii jail of Siiltaxipur luaul to tlie. said oixler daled No,4 has communicated some that Shubhkaraii Dwivedi has [Sultanpur Jail ia connection with ^itusel for tlie petitiouer ^tibudts :araii Dwivedi is released from tlie aforcsaid cases pendiag ia t be released froin cu^tody ou 2003 under Sections 302, 201, 25/27 of the Aiiu^ Act €veu passed toy fhe leamed Chief (^^fe^) XI-HC-22 f^ 3ST ;?TRn^ra', «IT{I'HII(S, f°idl^^< ^l^l^ct»^^ HTH^TT^vRT^T ^;"'"'""""'"' ^ 200 3TT^T^)T f^t^3TI^T $h^icb^f?cT Sh^lcb^T 3T[^?T5^<rTStR:^f?cT -3-1 <=hi^f<n^^ ^i^<nT£fte^t<r3i^J< ^31'f^q'3TI^T Ainbikap|ur Judicial Magistrate, Shubhkaran Dwivedi beyond We Jiiid a lot of force N Dubey. The record of the Ambikapur has been called catled upon Mr. Praxaod General to go through tlie sai<| whether cuiy order has beei Magistrate from wtdch fhe 0)2 tliat the defention of authorised beyond 19-1-2004| Mr, Verma, learaed siibiiiilled that tlie records produced before fbe Court Magistrate has passed order| D\vivedi in coixnection wifh. tlie said orders passed by| Aiiibikaptir, Shubhkaraii D|1 beforc fhe Chief Judicial tlie fact that orders have Magistrate, Arabikapiir for would show tliat the detenti been aullioiised bv the On a penisal of the in crime No.416/2003 it ikap^ur, authorizing fhe detention of 119-1-2004. tlie aforesaid suUxiiissiou ofMr. le^iraed Chief Judicial Magistrate, ft>r and is before fh.is Court. We Verjiia, learaed Additional Advocate W records and teU tlie Court as to pas^^ed by tlie Chief Judicial >urt caa come to tfae conclusion Stlubhkaraii Dwivedi has been w<fruld Additional Advocate General t>f llie Chief Judicial Ma^isliule show fhat fhe Chief Judicial for production of Shubhkaraii crime No.416/2003 but despite fhe Chief Judicial Magistrate, wivedi i^ uol beiug produced Accordmg to Mr, Venna, passed by fhe Chief Judicial of Shubhkaraa Dwivedi .on of Shubhkaraa Dwivedi has 19-1-2004. of Cliief Judicial Magistrate to iis tliat no express order M^istrate bebn pxjoduction Magi^tiute btiyoud re4ords apgears ('N'^r) i3£.a.:t.'RPff'?S3®-.': XI-HC-22 W^T^T ^qwani^T ^in^^rfN 3^ ^itAii^^, ^fi^T?, teray irraw^n^^r.^^i^200 w^r^cn'^K^N A- ^iqfe^T inTRTt'^'fe^t ^RSK ^^ri^TOT^ has beeu passed by the Shubhkaraii Dwivedi beyond Magistrate for detention of 19-1-2004, However, ordere have beeu paysed by tlie Chi^f Judicial Magistx'ate li'oui tiiiie to time for production of Shubtikaraa Dwivedi before the Chief Judicial Magisteate, Ambtkapu|r ifi coiinection wifh crime No. 416/2003. Till now the ^odd order for production of Shubhkaraa Dwivedi before the Chief Jiidicial Magistrate, Auibikapui', has uot btkeu coiu|plied willi aiid it appeai^ froui fhe documents filed by ffae r^spondent No.4 before us fhat this is because of fhe fact tiiat Bhubhkaraa Dwivedi is now m cu^tody io. connection with o^her cases in Courte ia Uttar Piadesh aiid the Cozirt.$of Utt4r Pradesh have been passiiig orders fiuxu tuiie to tmie regai^ttig deteudou of Shubhkai'au j Dwivedi. As aad when SIiut|hkaraii Dwivedi is produced |sed by the Chief Judicial |the Court in coiinection with J pursuaat to fhe oixiers pa^; Magistrate, Axnbikapur, before i crixne No,416/2003^ it will be ^Iways open for Chief Jiidicial Magisliule, Anibikapur, to authorizmg the detention oj accordaace wifh law. As yet as see, orders have been passed by pasy appixjpiiate orders Shubtikaraa Dwivedi m ^he position staiids aU fhat we fhe ChiefJudicial Magistrate, Aiabikapiir for prodziction of SI^ubhkaran Dwivedi before fhe ICourt ui couiiectiou willi llie afofe^aid case. In aay case, at fhis st ;e no reUef for rclease of Shubhkaran I)wivedi^nom_^e_Qisj^ct^mL-Sultanpttp-^U4^^^^ XI-HC-22 ^TI^T^T ;R"n^3:n^i- ^ri^^fiipf ! "^ Pathak ^f'\^ "^ ^& y l^ ^£T^FTf^T, ??Tfhl^, ^^TO'y . \^:?-^D^^~1 W^TB^T^T^S^I' ^T^feT^ WT^ff^ tWt ^f^ZI^" ^3^Tf3n^T Pradesh) caa be passed by tjiis Court ia this habeas corpus petition as he appears to J^e detaiaed isi ciistody ia the District JaU, Stdtaiiptu (Utttii' Pi'adesh) iii couuectiou vvitli other crimmal cases pendmg |ii fhe Courts in Uttar Piadesh. Wifh tiie aforesaid objseivatioiis, fhis habeas coxpus petition stands disposed o£ The records of thf. Chief Jiidicial Magistrate, Aiubikapur, be ^eut back for^biwilti. _-—— - Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge (^y^)