ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8192 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 8192 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 8192 OF 2008 Rajendra Pratap Bhavsar ...Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Yamunabai Shivram Appa & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Tushar Sonawane i/by Mr.Pritesh Bohade for the Petitioner. Mr.M.M.Sathaye for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 17th December, 2008. : 17th December, 2008. : 17th December, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. The Petitioner-tenant, after decree of eviction in favour of the Respondents-Landlords on the ground of bonafide need, moved an amendment application to bring on record subsequent events as Respondents-Landlords got possession of adjacent shop in the same premises. 2. The Appellate Court rejected the said application for the delay and latches. The subsequent possession of the premisses of adjacent shop as the pleas in support of this has already been raised, therefore, by putting on record more material which in my view need to be considered in the dispute of landlord and tenant ( 2 ) of this nature. 3. The submission that there is a delay in filing this Writ Petition has been answered in para 13 of the Petition. 4. In view of this, in the interest of justice to give full opportunity, I am inclined to grant this amendment, however, keeping all points open to Landlords-Respondents. 5. It is also made clear that the Petitioner-tenant should co-operate and see that the matter should be disposed of as early as possible without further delay. Even on earlier occasion though undertaking given, the tenant-Petitioner sought adjournments by way of one or other grounds and delayed the proceedings of eviction. 6. The Petition is accordingly, allowed. No costs. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)