1 crap1766.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1766 OF 2011 [Ganesh s/o Vinayak Patil vs Atmaram s/o Mahadu Patil and ors. ] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri V.S.Mane, advocate for the applicant Shri Joydeep Chatterjee, advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3 Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent no.4 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 21 st April, 2011. PER COURT :- 1 Issue notices to the respondents. Shri Joydeep Chatterjee, learned counsel waives service of notice for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Shri S.G.Nandedkar, learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for respondent no.4. 2 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3 This is an application preferred by the applicant, namely Ganesh Vinayak Patil i.e. the brother of deceased Sangita Patil, seeking permission to allow him to intervene in Criminal Appeal No. 1434 of 2011 and oppose the same by assisting the Additional Public Prosecutor in the said matter. 2 crap1766.11 4 For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the present application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ thereof and applicant i.e. brother of deceased Sangita is permitted to assist the learned Additional Public Prosecutor while conducting the hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 1434 of 2011 and present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap1766.11