IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-28140 of 2009 Date of Decision: 09.12.2009 Satpal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. M.K. Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. B.S. Thind, Advocate for the complainant. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the recovery of kirpan is yet to be effected. However, it has not been denied that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, the order dated 08.10.2009 passed by this Court is made absolute and the petition is, hereby, allowed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 09.12.2009 JUDGE gurpreet