CWP (T) No. 8591 of 2008. 21.12.2010 Present: Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. From the Attendance Register (Annexure R-1), annexed by the respondents, it is quite apparent that the petitioner remained on leave. By taking a lenient view, respondent No.3 sanctioned 34 days leave of the kind due. No fault can be found with the decision taken by the respondents. Consequently, it can not be said that any legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge December 21, 2010 CS