IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22869 of 2010 1. GANGYA DEVI @ JAGEYA DEVI wife of Ram Lakhan Yadav 2. Ram Lakhan Yadav son of late Musafir Yadav 3. Pappu Kumar Yadav @ Pappu Kumar son of Ram Lakhan Yadav------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.7.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.3 is a minor school going boy as mentioned in para- 5 of the petition. He is not entitled for any relief from this Court. Prayer is rejected. He is advised to get assessed his age from the court where his case is pending. Thereafter, pray for appropriate relief may be made from the Juvenile Justice Board. For petitioner nos.1 and 2, it is said that they are old enough and deceased committed suicide as was frustrated due to having no children. Witnesses are there examined in several paragraphs of case diary. It is submitted that there is no demand of dowry from the side of the petitioners but paragraph nos.4.6.7.8.9 and 10 of case diary are referred by the learned Sessions Judge that demand was there, torture was there soon before the death within seven years of marriage, F.I.R is also clear about that and death was not natural one. It is not the stage to consider the defence. The discussed ingredients are sufficient to coming in picture of presumption either for committing dowry death or abetting for suicide with no differences. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner nos.1 and 2 is also rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )