IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.352 of 1977 HARI NARAIN KOERI & ORS Versus MOST JHIRIA ORS ----------- 31 18.07.2008 Ravi/- Mr. Rangnath Choubey, advocate appears for the appellant and he submits that the appellant has compromised this appeal and has filed the compromise petition under I.A. No. 1626 of 2008 and he (Ashok Kumar Singh) has also signed on the affidavit attached to the compromise petition. So far the difference in signature as reported vide office report dated 26.6.2008 is concerned, the learned counsel says that the signature in Vakalatnama was written by the appellant in some haste, so it looks some different from the signature on the affidavit but the texture and tenor of the both signatures are similar and he confirms about there being similar. The learned counsel says that he, being confident about the signature of the appellant has also signed in the compromise petition. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, advocate appering for the respondents submits that the respondents have compromised this appeal in terms of the compromise and respondents have also signed the affidavits attached to the compromise. He further submits that being satisfied about the compromise and its having been signed by the respondents. He has also signed the compromise as the counsel for the respondents. Thus, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise as under I.A. No. 1626 of 2008. The compromise will form part of the decree. (C. M. Prasad, J.)