Crl. Misc. No.M-15150 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-15150 of 2011 Date of Decision: 19.05.2011 Kamruddin ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ....Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to the official respondents to take legal action against the accused in case FIR No.110 dated 21.03.2011 under Sections 363/366-A/120- B/420, 467/468/471 and 494 IPC registered at Police Station Sector 55, District Faridabad. The facts, in short, are that the daughter of the petitioner and her husband filed Crl. Misc. No.M-7649 of 2011 seeking protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of present petitioner. The said Crl. Misc. was disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Faridabad to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law. Thereafter, the present petitioner filed Crl. Misc. No.M-18158 of 2011 seeking modification of the order dated 11.03.2011. The Crl. Misc. No.M-18158 of 2011 was disposed of with the following order :- “ This is an application for recalling of the order dated 11.03.2011 passed by this Court also to initiate legal proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. Crl. Misc. No.M-15150 of 2011 2 A perusal of order dated 11.03.2011 passed in CRM No.M-7649 of 2011, shows that the only direction issued by this Court was to the Superintendent of Police, Faridabad, to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law. The said order has no bearing and is not an observation on the validity of marriage between the parties or otherwise. Therefore the same requires no modification and does not require to be recalled as it does not come in the way of the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy, in case, the petitioners have committed any criminal offence or otherwise. Civil Misc. Application is disposed of accordingly.” The FIR already stands registered on 21.03.2011 under Sections 363, 366-A,120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 494 IPC. Therefore, no further direction is required to be passed as prayed for in the present petition. Moreover, taking into account that the girl had herself appeared along with her husband and had filed Crl. Misc. No.M-7649 of 2011 seeking protection, it is doubtful whether any offence under Sections 363, 366-A, 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 494 IPC as prayed for in the present petition is made out. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner further states that in another case, this Court had ordered for registration of FIR under Section 376 IPC. However, no such order has been brought to the notice of this Court. Even otherwise, each criminal case is on the basis of its own set of facts. Dismissed accordingly. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 19.05.2011 JUDGE gurpreet