IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2008 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 3653 of 2008(I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- K.M.NAZEER HUSSAIN, S/O.KUNHARAMMU, VELLAKULAM HOUSE, P.O.PERIMBALAM, VIA.MUNDUPARAMBA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 2. HYDRALI, S/O.HYDROSE, KONNOTH HOUSE, ALANALLOOR, MANNARGHAT. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.3653/2008 I APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 10/10/2007. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT PROPOSING TO CONVENE THE TIMING CONFERENCE TO 27/12/2007. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT ON 29/12/2007. 2ND RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R2(A): COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE DTD. 19/08/2000. EXT.R2(B): COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 26/10/06. EXT.R2(C): COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN MVARP.NO.197/07 DTD. 17/09/07. EXT.R29D): COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.7708 DTD. 28/02/2008. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 3653 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer in this Writ Petition is to direct the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P1 and P3 objections while considering the request of the 2nd respondent for change of timings in respect of stage carriage No.KL-09 H/6771. 2. In the counter affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent it is stated that, pursuant to Ext.R2(c) and R2(d), request for revision of timings is liable to be considered by the 1st respondent. If that be so, there is no reason why Exts.P1 and P3 also are not considered when the matter engages the attention of the 1st respondent. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent that as and when the request of the 2nd respondent for revision of timing is taken up for consideration, petitioner shall WPC No. 3653 OF 2008 2 also be put to notice and his objections, vide Exts.P1 and P3 shall also be considered. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ttb WPC No. 3653 OF 2008 3