^^' ^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Second Appeal N0. ^°'?''/2003 APPELLANT: / Vijay Kumar Yadav /DEFENDENT ..^ S/o Dhaadhuram Yadav Aged about 36 Years Occupation-Proprietor-Vijay Hotel Buji Bhawan Chowk .Raigarh \<^y^T/ / Teh. & Distt. Raigarh [Chhattisgarh] ^\. t;^'< / <^.-/^ VERSUS ^/yy. i>"^'.^/ ^'^ ^yy RESPONDENT: PLAINTIFF ^ .^" /' w ^Bhagirathi Sharma 9.- ^ ^ KS/O Rameshwar Prasad Sharma ^ Occupation -Business R/o Thethwar para ,Raigarh Teh. & Distt. Raigarh [Chhattisgarh] SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE t asss;K LOKADALAT Chliattisgarli Hi^ S.A.No. 707 of 2003 AppeUant : VgayKumarYadav -Versus- Respondent : BliagiraAhj SIiarma 4.8.2007 Shri A. K. Athatey, Advocalte with the appcUanf Shn Vg^ Kumar Yadav. j Shri H. ^. |Patel and StiLri RajendraTripatN, Adwacateswifh fhe respomlent [BliagijTa^ Sharma, Thc appellaTit has liled tlie application datcd 17th Fcbniary, 2007 mider Ordcr 23 Rule ^rcad with Sectton 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure wifh^^^^f^ wifh.fhe appeal^'|:;^^ TYxlay fUe| ajFypeIlant an^ faawe fited jomt application for c^omprMEi^ .Adalat, At fhe re^uest bffearned cou^ tbe mstter is tal^n up m fhe l^^^^/^ Tfae parti^Si faave filed compromise petst^ ya 1^ M^wm% teHn:-: • . • ': ' l,'.l .;,:..„ ^Bo&j fhte pail^ court bcca^ witMr^ jthe seoond ^ fhe respondcnt Bha^trafhi Sfaarma h^ not^^^^^^^^^^ the appettent gi^possessicmalK^^ In view of t^e above fhe second appeal No. 7ff7/'2Q03, ajrismg out offhe judginent and dccrce dated 25.8.2003 passedlbyfheFirst Additkmal District Jydgp, Raigarli ia Civil Appeat No. 9-A/20Q3, ^taods disposedj ^^^^^^m peculiar facts a^ 1. as to costs. Sd/- (J^i^tice Satfeh K. ^gnihotri) I Membcr- Loifcil^dalat High Ccmrt ofCh]i{|tttis^^ BILASPUR Sd/- tcmliey- ',lligh||||i||o| il^ililffigl'ijj'1 ^ ?- ^ ai ^•^^^y^siS'S^S;^^