IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2445 OF 2003. OF MOTION NO. 2445 OF 2003. OF MOTION NO. 2445 OF 2003. IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2705 OF 2003 NO. 2705 OF 2003 NO. 2705 OF 2003 Anuradha Shridhar Gadgil. ] .. Plaintiff Versus 1. Nirmala Gopal Nene & Ors. ] .. Defendants Mr.N.D. Jaywant for the plaintiff. Ms.Manjiri Parasnis i/b Girish Godbole for the defendants. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C. : 1. Considering the fact that this Notice of Motion is pending since 2003 without any ad-interim order, there is no case which need to be considered for granting reliefs as prayed in this Notice of Motion now. By order dated 8th September 2003, it has been observed that the plaintiff can always be compensated in terms of money considering the claim of the plaintiff. All points are kept open. The plaintiff is at liberty to take out appropriate Notice of Motion or such other : 2 : proceedings, if necessary, based on the existing facts. 2. In view of the above observation, this Notice of Motion is disposed of with liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] [srpasha@hc]