gliR&^S^Sfi-iai (Y^J IN THE HIOH COURT GF JUBICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^oif2—/2Q03 PETITIONERS ^- /' >' ^••^ •^y •••y<^v^' ..y^" '<-?" RESPONDENTS ^l^ ^-^ y^ ^t^^ VERSUS 1» Janki Bal w<3/o tJanardan Verma aged 66 years; 2» Dhanendra Kumar s/o Janardlan Verma aged 42 years ; 3* MaJLkulal s/o Janardan Verma aged 38 years; 4, Cbandra Shekhar s/o Janardan Verma aged 45 years; AAl cultivators and resident of vtllage Rawan^ Tahsil Simga/ in ttae Policd Station of Suhela Qistrict Raipur (C. Q.) 1. M/s Grasim Cement Indlustries Limited Unit at Bawan (through the Maha Prabtaaneltaak) tahsil Simga^ District Raipur C.G. ) 2 ^ Vice-Chairman^ (Personnel and Administration) M/s Grasim Cement In<3ustries Limited^ Unit at Rawan Tahstl Siroga District Raipur (C.G# ) 3y State of Chhatfeisgarh through the Secretary^ ©epartmentof tevenue, Qovt,of Ctthattisgarh Raipur (D.K^Bhawan^ Raipuir) 4. Sub-Divisional Offieer, Bhatapara^ (Revenue)^ Tahsil - Bhatapara, District Raipur (CG) 5. The Collector, Raipur* Distriet Raipur (C.G. ) ^. Union of 3[n<3ia» throiagh the Chief of Secretaxry (Oepartinent o£ Mining and Industries)^ New Delhi. Cont<3..«>2 ^' •t. •' :-2-1 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 ANfii 227 ©FTHE CONSTITOTION OF INDIA F©RISSyf OP WRIT IN THE NATORS OF MANDAWS CERCIQRARY, PROMIBITION ETC. OR ANY AE'PROPRIATE WRIT. ©IRECTIGN©R©StDER. '^^:- ^r-;., ^aaKa S:fS^?ffS--S XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T f<rli<=h 371^1 5t)^ich "yf^a >j<>/' ^ ^ ^^t v^ll^td<4, ^flWT^, M^l<4^< sn^ ^^ WHCTi ^rRT^ 200 'fN^ST' ^TT^T'^TT^H: ^rftcf cbl^f<n<flr1 'HFI^f^ 'fec3t <f^l^l< ^ 3rf^FT 37T^T (SB : Hon'ble Shri Satish K AgnllliQtrl, J-) 21-10-2008 Shri J R. Verma, counsel for \ Shri Shashank Thakur, respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Rajendra Agrawal, Pa(iel Lawyer for the State/responclents No.3> 4 & 5 On the request of learned c<| the respondents, four weeks tim4 is granted to file return to the issue as to why aft^ tand oompensation has not been learned counsel for the petltioners,| been acquired iSSegally, / Learned counsel for the he petitioners. counsei for the unsel appearing for |r acquisitton of the |'>ajd According to land in dlspute has ? peti1| suppiy copy of the petition alongl learned counsei for the State durin^ oners is dlrected to wlth annexures to course of the day. M.(W^.P.No. 1851/2003 This is an application for inte^jm relief. Learned counsel for the p^titioners does not want to press this application. Accordingjy, the application nressed. s djsmissed as not Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge [Tri'^ ^Ra^