Criminal Misc. No. M-25164 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-25164 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 1.10.2008 Sunder Lal Maloo ..... Petitioner vs The State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Jasjit Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. The prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 54 dated 31.1.2008, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 506, 120-B IPC, at Police Station DLF, Sector-29, Gurgaon. The first bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this court vide order dated 3.4.2008. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Criminal Misc. No. M-11444 of 2008 for anticipatory bail. The same was dismissed as withdrawn with the statement that the petitioner was intending to settle the dispute with the complainant. Without there being any development in the case and without the petitioner having surrendered before the authority and joining investigation, he filed Criminal Misc. No. M-14199 of 2008 under Section 482 Cr. P. C. for quashing of FIR which was dismissed on 30.5.2006. The present petition is third in the series for grant of pre-arrest bail. A perusal of the facts stated in para 27 shows that against the order passed by this court declining to quash the FIR, the petitioner filed SLP before Hon'ble the Supreme Court where the order of this court was upheld. The only new issue sought to be raised in the present petition is that the petitioner now intends to settle the dispute with the complainant and ready and willing to arrange another flat in the similar area and building measuring 1200 square feet at the old rates. However, this court does not find this to be a new development which could entitle the petitioner to approach this court third time for grant of anticipatory bail, once his earlier petitions have already been dismissed and the petitioner is avoiding arrest for the last eight months. Criminal Misc. No. M-25164 of 2008 2 For the reasons mentioned above, I do not find any merit in the present petition for grant of anticipatory bail. The same is accordingly dismissed. 1.10.2008 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge