Crl. Rev. No.368 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.368 of 2010 Date of Decision: 04.08.2010 Smt. Meena Kumari ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. This is a revision against the Order dated 25.05.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bhiwani, vide which, the respondents/accused persons have been acquitted from the charges against them under Sections 420/406 IPC. The facts in the present case are that the petitioner contacted Administrator of Baba Mumgipa College, Shorewali Gali, Bhiwani for taking admission in LL.B. and had submitted her original certificates along with Rs.2500/- as fee. She also appeared in the examination of LL.B from the abovesaid College but when no enrolment and registration number was provided to her and her result was not declared, she was forced to file complaint against the College. Finally, an FIR No.105 dated 27.03.2000 under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the respondents. Crl. Rev. No.368 of 2010 2 Heard. Meena Kumari-complainant appeared as PW-2 and admitted that she had appeared in the examination at Pilani Centre on Roll No.1008. She admitted that she gave her examination in the year 1997 under Roll No.1008 at B.M. Law College, Pilani. Tejpal Sharma son of Balu Ram Sharma appeared as DW-1 and deposed that the affiliation was provided to a College on the basis of report of Board of Director of the University and produced on record the minutes of meeting for the year 1996-97 as Ex.DW1/A, vide which the affiliation was provided to Baba Mungipa College, Bhiwani for the year 1997-98 vide Memo no.22. He also deposed that he had brought the Gazette as Ex.DW1/B, in which, at page No.52 against Roll No.1008, Meena Kumari was declared as fail. With respect to Rs.2500/- having been paid by her, the complainant could not produce any receipt. In view of the above, no fault can be found with the finding that the petitioner appeared from the B.M. Law College, Pilani under Roll no.1008 and she had failed in the examination. Thus, there is no ground to interfere with the Order dated 25.05.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bhiwani, vide which, the respondents/accused persons have been acquitted from the charges against them under Sections 420/406 IPC, is made out. Dismissed. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 04.08.2010 JUDGE gurpreet