IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2011 / 22ND ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1026 of 2011(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18088/2011 Dated 18/07/2011 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED, S/O ABDUL REHIMAN, 35 YEARS, SAMMANATH-HOUSE, CHEMBODE, PANANDATTUKARA P.O, THRISSUR DIST.(CASHIER TRAINEE, SECTION OFFICE, K.S.E.B,O/O, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR ) BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. ROOPKALA JAGATH AGE AND (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER) SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1 2. ABDUL REHMAN SAIT, AGE AND (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER) CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. RAJAN P, AGE AND (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR-1 4. JINADEVAN TS AGE AND (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WADAKANCHERY DIVISION, WADAKANCHERY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. PIN 680001 BY ADV. SRI. K.S. ANIL, SC, KSEB. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 1026 of 2011(S) APPENDIX: PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A: CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) No.18088/2011 DATED 18.7.2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE B: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 28.07.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT No. 4 THROUGH PROPER CHANNEL. ANNEXURE C: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ISSUED BY THE AE TO THE RESPONDENT No.4 DATED 28.07.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE. Kp/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------------- Cont.case(C) No.1026 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 18088 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that the directions in the judgment dated18.7.2011 in W.P(C) No.18088/2011 have been complied with. In view of the said position obtained in this case, the above contempt petition is closed. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE jma //true copy// P.A to Judge