IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13959 of 2004 MAHENDRA SINGH, Son of sardar Tirlok Singh Chhabra, Acting President, Prabandhak Committee, takhat Sri Harimandirji, Patna City-8 Police Station Chowk, District Patna, Bihar ----------------Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner, Secondary Education Bihar Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15 4. Chairman Vidyalya Sewa Board through Comissioner, Secondary Education Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15 5. Sri Sunil Kumar, Secretary Vidyalya Sewa Board, through Commissioner Secondary Education Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna-15 6. The District Education Officer Collectorate Patna-1 7. Sri Raja Singh son of late Sohan Singh, Harimandirji Gali, Patna city, Police Station Chowk, District-Patna 8. Sardar Kamaljit Singh, Principal Sri Guru Gobind Singh Boys High School, Bare Ki Gali, Patna City-8 9. Kushal Kishore Son of Suresh Chandra Singh, Muhalla Lal Imli, Police Station Chowk, Patna city-District-Patna 10. Dharampal Prasad, Teacher, Sri Guru Gobind Singh Boys High School, Bare Ki Gali, Patan city-8 ----------------Respondents. ----------- 6. 11.08.2010 The primary objection raised on behalf of the private respondents is that the petitioner is not a claimant to the post and has no direct conflict of interest in the matter of appointment of teachers in the school in question. In addition to that it is also stated that the writ is neither for a writ of quo- warranto nor it is levelled as Public Interest Litigation. As such it is merely a case by a busy body trying to interfere with the affairs of the institution in question. 2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working President of Prabandhak Committee and he has a vital interest in the affairs of the school. If the petitioner is holder of an office of responsibility then he has all the powers to exercise by carrying the committee with him. The objection raised on behalf of the respondents seems to be correct. The Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application in the present form. It is dismissed. Anand Kr. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)