t- 11 cr^^^^ ^ ^^l^^'3' IN THE HIGH COURT OF^JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITIONNO. tf-S.^ /2006 PETITIONER / S. IVIOHAN RAO, S/0. SHRI S. JAGANNATHAIVI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ,.-••" ,. HEAD IVIASTER, IVI.V.N RAO IVIEMORIAL PRE ./rt^.--"' ...••'TMIDDLE SCHOOL, KHURSIPAR ZONE -3 . <5P>W.<^'''"" ..•"'" BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (C.G.) ./^ ^7'~ ^v'.y R^PONDENTS ^i^^ ^•°'" - GV VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 2. DIRECTOR, PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, PENSION BADA, RAIPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner humbly begs to submit as under:- ^lWMWffW oyc|<-qiqjn<t,gs^FI3,f^R:I3? .......^.....^l^ 3I^?liwp(^fgd^) an^T^iR-ll* (rai3ii^?rap:ite ^" ?^II<R^lfi(T ST^V 4-4-2006 Shri Anoop Mazumdar, eoun ^n<ifCT<Ili llinTtTfeliSI <R|+5;H ^arf^Tan^r sl for thc patitioner. Shri Vinay Pondey, Panet Lcnfyer for the State. Heard. Learned counsel for the p4titioner siAmits that under Rule 330) of Chhattisgorh Ashaskiyal Shlkshan Smsthon (Adhyapdko Tatha Anya KarnKichflriyon Ke Ve't^mo Ka Sandaya) Adhtniyun, 197B, the petitioner isentitled toget th|e benefits whero the fiofrernment grant is beirg given to the sc|»le uwresponding G<ate9ories of employees in fiovernment educatiotial institutions. On the other hofri, learne^ submits that the petitioner h( coimset appearing for theState, strcn^itaiiiwy filed this petitlon without servin9 nDtice for denion^ofjusttee. In that view of the mattet, Shri Mazumdar, leomed counsel for the petitioner, prays that tt|e petitioner may be permitted to m<d<e a ctetailed r'epr'esentation b^fore the competent outhority of the respondents, w»hich shall be| consideped on itg own merits in accordonce with IONI. I The prayer is not opposed ^y the other side. Hoving considered and wit|iout expreastng <my opinioh on the merits of the case, in the opinim^ of tMs CMirt, ends of juatice will be served if o direetipn is givn •(o the petitionw to moke a detafled representation rtBsifg his gr\ SP/FS/2605- evonces before the competent .Wei^tfKtlOi.t^-W^w^e, Rlci |y'< r" [pF t^^vfo^ ifllcitl^RTqp 3n^T^r8TlfT aqTaii^tamiw Sowri sroiSR^iftaan^T 3ntswray(1g^fgEi%) ~J~ ^ authorlty of the re^ondents alon^ wiitCTJl'i *ii*inT*rRl^l'iRi'(<;I< ^aiRpTsii^?! Nrith o copy of the petitton and this order, within o period of one n^onth, ond on such rcppesentction being flled, the competent authori-t^ of the rc^»ondcnts^Kdl decide the same on its own meritd in <^cordance with kwr ce early as possible preferably withina perrod rf three months from the date of receipt of the r'epresentation, It i^ made cletir that if amy grievcuwe still remains, the petitioner may m^it the remedy availtfcte under the 1(U»includiiy •filirg of petition. With the aforesaid obs^rvutions, this petition stands disposedof. ; C«Ttifiedcopy as per rutes. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^/ ^^ •Sh