CWP-T No.2133 of 2008. 06.01.2009 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondents. It is not disputed by the petitioner that his brother was gainfully employed in the H.P. Road Transport Corporation. There is a specific bar in the memorandum dated 18th January, 1990 to the effect that in all cases where one or more members of the family are already in Government service or in employment of Autonomous bodies/Boards/Corporations etc., the State/Central Government employment assistance should not under any circumstances be provided to the second or third member. In view of the categorical bar imposed in sub clause (c) of clause 5 of memorandum dated 18th January, 1990, the writ petition has no merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. January 06, 2009. (sck)