IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl. MC. No. 3544 of 2011() (C.C. NO: 785/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KASARAGOD) .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 5:- 1. M.MUSSAMBIL, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.HUSSAIN HAJEE, RESIDING AT RUKSANA MANZIL, G.H.S. ROAD, SHIRIYA, P.O.SHIRIYA, KUMBLA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. HUSSAIN HAJEE, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM, RESIDING AT RUKSANA MANZIL, G.H.S. ROAD, SHIRIYA, P.O.SHIRIYA, KUMBLA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. AYSHA, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.HUSSAIN HAJEE, RESIDING AT RUKSANA MANZIL, G.H.S. ROAD, SHIRIYA, P.O.SHIRIYA, KUMBLA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. RUKSANA, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O.MOHAMMED AYOOB, D/O.HUSSAIN HAJEE, RESIDING AT BISMILLA MANZIL, POYYA, NEAR UPPALA GATE, P.O.UPPALA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 5. MOHAMMED AYOOB, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.MOIDEEN HAJEE, RESIDING AT BISMILLA MANZIL, POYYA, NEAR UPPALA GATE, P.O.UPPALA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS:- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. FATHIMATH SABANA, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O. (LATE) IDDINKUNHI, RESIDING AT ARIMALA, P.O. BADAJE, MANJESHWAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. R1 BY SMT. JASMINE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R2 BY ADV. SRI.AJEESH S.BRITE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: SP Crl. MC. No. 3544 of 2011() PETITIONERS' ANNEXURE :- 1. ANNEXURE - I - COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN C.C. 785/2010 BEFORE THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE'S COURT, KASARAGOD. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. SP N.K. BALAKRISHNAN,J. ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No. 3544 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011 ORDER Petitioners are the accused in CC. 785/10 of CJM, Kasaragod. The offence alleged against them is under Section 498A r/w 34 IPC. The first respondent is the de facto complainant therein. It is submitted by both sides that the entire matter has been settled out of court. She is represented in this court by her counsel. Affidavit has been filed by the first respondent stating that the entire matter has been settled. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this petition is allowed. Further proceedings in 785/10 of CJM, Kasaragod is quashed. N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. smvd