a W‘V‘Q?”@Vz,c$ IN THE MADHYA PRADESH STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIB AL,JABALPUR CRIGmAL APPLICATION Ncg2o$$ of 1997 APPLI CANT :- Soor Shyam Gaikwqd,s/o Heeralal Gaikwad aged 30 years,upper Division Teacher. Gcvt. Middle Scgool of Tribal Welfare Deptt . .Bhanbeda , Shiksha Vikas Khand and Tahsil Bhanupratappur Dist .Bast‘ar M.P. Permanan'a r/o Ghorda Tah.Bhanupratappur Dist Bastar Jagdalpur M.P. Versus NGN AFFLICANTS :- 1.State of M.P. through the Secretary Tribal Welf. are Deptt . BhOpal M . P . 2.Add1. Commissionerxribal Wm Development B astar Jagdalpur M . P . 3. Head Master Govt Middle School of Tribal Welfare Deptt .Bhanbeda,Tahsil ,Bhanupratappur Dist . Bastar .Jaddalpur 4. D.S.Netam,Superintendant,Balak Ash- ram Konta,Ta.h Konta Dist Bastar.M.P. APPLICATIQN U/s 1’9 9F Tm; ADMINIsTaATIva TRIBUNALS ACT 1985 DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTR! J. WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 2283 OF 2005 Petitioner i Soor shyam Gaikwad Versus Resgondents State of MP. and others Present : None appears forthe petitioner. Mr. V.V.s. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate Generai with Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on 9‘ Day of March, 2007) The petitioner, whiie working as Upper Division Teacher Middle School, Bhanbeda was transferred to Baiak Ashram Konta as Superintendent on the same terms and conditions, vide Impugned transfer order dated 30-6-1996 (Annexure A-2). 2. The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. vide interim order dated 1-9-1997, directed for maintaining status quo, as was existing on that day. 3. Be that as it may. with the passage‘of time, this petition has become infruetu‘ous as period of transfer is not applicable forever. At this point of time, there is Xno question to examine the validity of the impugned transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency,’ Without inSisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. it is well settled principle of iaw that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decided as to where a particuiar ofticerlemployee be posted keeping in View public interest as weii as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere oniy in the case of \ W proved maia tide, non-competence of authority passing the transfer orde¥ and transfer order not being in conformity with the ruies and regulations. 5. In View of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as t costs. i t Sdl— \ Satish K.Agnihotri Judge i T L Subhash m o