IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.143 of 2001 Laungbati Devi @ Launglata Dev Versus Abdul Matim Ansari & Ors ---------------------------------- 27 10-8-2011 I.A.No. 2091 of 2010 This is a compromise petition filed by appellant nos. 1 to 6 and respondent nos. 1 and 9 of this appeal. Mr. Ratan Kumar Sinha, Advocate, appears on behalf of the appellants and Md. Iqbal Asif Niaze , Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 9. It has been stated in paragraph nos.9 and 15 of the compromise petition that only appellants and respondent nos. 1 and 9 are concerned with the suit properties and rest of the respondents are only formal parties. It has been further stated in paragraph no.8 of the compromise petition that respondent no.9, Md. Zakir Hussain, has executed deed of special power of Attorney in favour of respondent no.1, Abdul Matin Ansari, appointing him as his Attorney and authorizing him to enter into compromise with the appellants and accept the said compromise before the Court. In view of the aforesaid statements made in the compromise petition, the compromise petition is accepted and this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise 2 which shall form part of the decree. roy ( V. Nath, J.)