1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2560 OF 1994 The State of Maharashtra, Through the Executive Engineer, Medium Project Division, Jalgaon. ....Petitioner. Versus 1] Vishnu Dudha Mahajan, At & Post : Tamaswadi, Tq. Parola, Dist. Jalgaon. 2] The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jalgaon. ....Respondents. Shri. K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for the petitioner. Shri. ,S.R. Shelke Advocate for the respondent No. 1. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 15th July, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties submit that by Government Resolution dated 24/11/2000, some persons working on daily wages in the Department were absorbed on regular basis. However, the case of the present respondent No. 1 has not been considered for the reason that the present writ petition is pending. In 2 view of the afore said position, respondent No. 1 /employee is permitted to make the representation to the petitioner / State Government which shall be considered by the State Government on its own merits. 2. In view of the fact that, the Industrial Court has granted reinstatement and continuity in service with full back wages to the respondent, by an order dated 28/02/1994, by recording a finding of fact that there was non compliance of Section 25 F and 25 G of the Act, the matter does not call for interference under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that the other employees who were appointed on same day and terminated on the same day were absorbed in service, in view of the Government Resolution. Hence, all these aspects shall be taken into consideration by the State Government, while considering the representation of the respondent No. 1 / employee. 3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. However, there shall be no order as to costs. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] SDM*2560.94(J)