IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8828 of 2006 BINDA RAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 3.1.2011 It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a typographical error in the order dated 1.12.2010 passed in the present case. At page 2 in the last sentence reference is made to 5th Pay Revision Commission dated 1.1.1986 and similarly in the last but one paragraph the same dated 1.1.1986 is repeated, it should be read as 1.1.1996 at both the places. State has no objection. In my view, the correction is necessary. It is allowed. Let 1.1.1986 at both the places, as noticed above, be read as 1.1.1996 in the said order. singh (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J)