1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.530 OF 2009 IN MISC.CIVIL APPLN. NO.473 OF 2009 (MRS. LINATA MILIND KULKARNI...Vs..MILIND SHRIDHAR KULKARNI.) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Applicant Mrs. Linata Kulkarni in person. Shri Aniruddha Choube, Advocate for Applicant/Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JULY 07, 2009. 1. Since the applicant in Misc. Civil Application No. 473 of 2009 had claimed that she was residing at Akola and therefore, the proceedings in Family Court at Nagpur be transferred to Akola, and since the Non-applicant had contested this fact, the question of appointment of Commissioner to find out whether the original applicant resides at Akola arose and it is, therefore, that the this application has been filed by original non-applicant for appointment of commissioner. 2. It seems that the original applicant does not want a Commissioner to be appointed, as can be seen from 2 her reply. Her claim that, question as to whether she resides at Akola had already been decided, has to be rejected, since adjudication she refers to in paragraph 9 of the order of the learned Civil Judge Senior Division is in different context. 2. In any case, since the original applicant does not want a Commissioner to be appointed, the reasons for opposing such a prayer would be oblivious. 3. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE RR.