IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21486 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:21.11.2011 Mohd. Ramzan @ Rachpal Singh and another ...Petitioners versus State of Punjab, through Secretary Home, Civil Secretariat, Punjab, Chandigarh, and others. ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr.R.S.Modi, Advocate, for the petitioners ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners seek for protection for life and liberty on the ground that they have performed nakahnama voluntarily being adults on 08.11.2011, but they are apprehensive of being harassed by their respective relatives. The petitioners' complaint is that they have sought for protection through representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala. The issue has been dealt with by the Bench of this Court in Pardeep Kumar Versus State of Civil Writ Petition No.21486 of 2011 (O&M) - 2 - Haryana-2008(2) ILR 62. In terms of the said judgment, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, shall afford such protection as the law permits. 2. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 21.11.2011 sanjeev