IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26119 of 2009 SUNIL SINGH @ SUNIL KUMAR SINGH @ SUNIL KUMAR SUMAN, son of Shri Maheshwar Singh, village Mandaidih, P.S. Patepur, District Vaishali Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.9.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Prima facie the delayed version of the wife and the father of the deceased, more than two months of the occurrence, would not inspire confidence for the purposes of implicating the petitioner to be the assailant of the deceased. None-the-less the police had proceeded on that basis and the prosecution still have to prove the case but then considering the fact that the petitioner had remained unnamed for a period of 60 days in which period the wife of the deceased has already taken steps for release of the amount of insurance and thereby was conscious of her right and obligations, the petitioner is correct in contending that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Be that as it may, considering peculiar feature of this case, as noted above, this Court is inclined to grant bail 2 to the petitioner. That being so, the petitioner, Sunil Singh @ Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Kumar Suman, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Tisiauta P.S.Case No. 42/2008. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/