Crl. Misc. No.M-13307 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-13307 of 2010 Date of Decision: May 7, 2010 Parminder Kaur …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Anurag Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered at the instance of her father alleging that the petitioner was married to Karnail Singh and had illicit relations with Manpreet Singh. Karnail Singh committed suicide on account of the immoral activities of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had married Manpreet Singh after the death of her husband Karnail Singh on June 29, 2009. She had also filed a petition for protection in the High Court Crl. Misc. No.M-13307 of 2010 [2] alongwith Manpreet Singh and a direction had been given by the High Court to the SSP, Ludhiana on December 1, 2009 for appropriate action. It is claimed by the petitioner that on account of greed, the property which is to be vested in petitioner after the death of her husband Karnail Singh she has been falsely implicated by her father. Counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that offence of abetment to suicide is not made out if seen in context to Section 107 IPC. No overt act is attributed to the petitioner indicating that she had, in any manner, abated suicide of Karnail Singh. I have heard counsel for the petitioner at length and considered all the submissions. The petitioner in enquiry has been found to have illicit relations during the life time of Karnail Singh. The date of death of Karnail Sigh is June 29, 2009. Within less than a period of six months, she performed marriage with Manpreet Singh. While approaching High Court for protection Parminder Kaur and Manpreet Singh had not impleaded Pal Singh, complainant as there was no threat to their life and liberty at the hands of the complainant. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, it will be premature to arrive at any conclusion that the death of Karnail Singh did not have anything to do with the illicit relations of the petitioner with Manpreet Singh to whom she has married immediately after the death. In view of the above circumstances, there are no extraordinary exceptional circumstances to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner. All the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner may constitute a good Crl. Misc. No.M-13307 of 2010 [3] ground for grant of regular bail but I do not find any circumstance to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. In case the petitioner surrenders before the Illaqa Magistrate or investigating officer, her application for regular bail will be decided expeditiously by the Court of competent jurisdiction. May 7, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE