CRM-M No. 3080 of 2011(O&M) **** Joginder Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another Present: Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Gill, DAG, Punjab. Mr.Balwinder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in private complaint bearing No. 87 dated 12.02.2008 titled as “Joginder Singh and Mahla Singh and others”, under Sections 420, 418, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 167, 148, 149 IPC, pending in the Court of SDJM, Talwandi Sabo. Interim order was granted in favour of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the complainant has argued that the present is a case which is totally based on documentary evidence and the guilt of the petitioner is open and shut. I asked learned counsel appearing for the parties as to how much time they would take to lead their respective evidence. Learned counsel for the complainant states that six months time be granted to the complainant to lead his entire evidence provided that the matter is not derailed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner would lead his entire evidence within three months. It has further been mentioned that the matter is fixed in the first week of August, 2011 for evidence. In this view of the matter it is directed that the learned trial Court shall decide this case on or before 31.05.2012 and will seek necessary extension in case it is not able to so decide the same for the reasons beyond CRM-M No. 3080 of 2011(O&M) -2- its control. However, the interim order dated 15.02.2011 made in favour of the petitioners stands confirmed. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE July 26, 2011 sunita