IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1526 of 2006 SAVITRI DEVI WIFE OF LATE NANDLAL PRASAD SINHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – NERUT, P.O. NERUT, DISTRICT NALANDA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, VISHWASHARYA BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, VISHWASHARYA BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, VISHWASHARYA BHAWAN, NEW SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION BHAGALPUR. 5. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETERIAT, BIHAR, PATNA . 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BHAGALPUR. ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. S.k. Giri, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. K.K. Singh, Advocate. ---------- 09. 19.07.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Provident Fund Officer, Bhagalpur as respondent no. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the husband of the petitioner while working under the respondent no. 4 retired on 28th of February, 1989 and later on died on 14th of July 2002. It is further submitted on account of giving effect to the promotion which was 2 shifted back from 1985 to 1973, pensionary benefits could not be settled as yet after giving effect to the shifting back of the promotion. It is further submitted that except the payment of provisional pension no other retiral benefits was settled and paid. It is further submitted that as on today correct pay slip is required to be issued giving effect to the extant pay revision with effect from 1st of January 2006. Besides the above, the leave encashment has not been correctly paid as also the payment of GPF and some arrears of salary have remained to be paid. Learned counsel for the State submits that during the pendency of this writ application, the pay slip in respect to the husband of the petitioner was issued on 13th of March 2010 under intimation to the petitioner as contained in Annexure- F to the supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 4. It is further submitted that the other claims of the petitioner as indicated above needs to be verified from the records. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4 with a copy to respondent nos. 6 and 7. In view of the above, in case such representation 3 stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the left out grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues if any, may also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)