IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5175 of 2010 1. RAM NIVAS KUMAR S/O SRI HARI KISHORE SHARMA R/O VILL SALALPUR, P.S.PARWARPUR, DISTT-NALANDA Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL, DOORDARSHAN, BROAD CASTING CORPORATION BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 3. DY. DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL DOORDARSHAN, BROADCATING CORPORATION DOORDARSHAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 4. DIRECTOR, DOORDARSHAN KENDRA, BROADCATING CORPORATION OF INDIA MUZAFFARPUR 5. ADDITIONAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GROUP CENTRE RESERVE POLICE FORECE YELHANKA, BANGALORE 04/ 05.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India, who states that for the relief prayed for in the writ application that petitioner should be allowed continuity of service for the period he served the C.R.P.F., petitioner should approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, as relief against the Doordarshan, which is under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of the Union of India, should be first availed by filing the original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). In view of the objection raised by the counsel for the Union of India, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek relief in the light of the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the C.R.P.F. authorities and the Doordarshan authorities in the instant writ case by appending the same with the O.A. which is to be filed before the Tribunal. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)