THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.288 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: After considerable amount of debate at the bar, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that, the ends of Justice would be better served if the appellant in the second appeal who is the first defendant in the suit is granted reasonable time for liquidating the decretal amount completely. 2. I consider that the suggestion of the learned counsel for the appellant deserves to be accepted. Commencing from January, 2012, the appellant is granted nine months time to liquidate the entire liability arising out of the decree by making deposits every month. Any default committed by him in making the deposits to the credit of the suit in two succeeding months in making the deposit, the decree holder will be entitled to execute the decree without further reference to this Court. On the other hand, if the first defendant/appellant makes deposits each month, the decree may not be executed for a period of nine months. 3. I have not seen any substantial question of law arising for me to admit the second appeal. Hence, with the above observations, the second appeal is dismissed at the admission stage. _______________________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO 16th December, 2011 Sp