1 jpc/­ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 588 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO. 564 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 588 OF 2009 Arjun Ramchandra Nanaware .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents Shri Vishwanath Talkute, for the Applicant Shri S. A. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent­State CORAM :SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 14th October, 2009. P. C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This revision application is filed against order dated 24th September, 2009 of the Ld. Sessions Judge, Satara allowing the appeal filed by the State and setting aside the order of the Ld. JMFC of acquittal of the applicant accused from the offences punishable under Section 498­A, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant accused submits that the Learned Sessions Judge Satara, who has allowed the appeal has cancelled the order of maintenance of Rs.1000/­ which was awarded to the wife in the Revision preferred by the present applicant, and at that time held that there is no justifiable reason for the wife to stay away from the 2 husband. However, while deciding the Appeal under Section 498­A, the same Judge has taken a contrary view. 4. It appears that the applicant has arguable case, hence the Revision application is admitted. 5. So far as bail application is concerned, the Learned Sessions Judge allowed the appeal and by invoking powers under Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure allowed the bail application. 6. The same bail granted is continued with fresh bond. 7. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) jpc/­