IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2504 of 208 (O&M) Date of Decision 01.09.2009 Prem Pal ...... Petitioner VERSUS Rajpal Singh and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjay Vij, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 13.03.2008, passed by Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Gurgaon vide which the order dated 11.11.2006, passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurgaon, dismissing the application for injunction of the respondents-plaintiffs (herein referred as 'the respondents'), has been set aside. Arguments heard at length. The sale was effected by Smt.Saroj Bai in the year 2006. She had inherited the property from her mother Smt.Ram Bai (mother of Smt.Saroj Bai). Learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on two power of attorneys, executed by Smt.Saroj Bai and Smt.Ram Bai in order to ascertain their title but these documents cannot be prima facie proved to be the document of title. As such, no injunction with regard to alienation in favour of respondents could be granted as they have failed to prima facie show that they are the owners of the property. Coming to the question of possession, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded that parties are co-shares. Both the parties have consented to maintain status quo during the pendency of the suit. Accordingly, this petition is partly allowed. The status-quo with regard to alienation is vacated. However, the parties shall maintain status quo with regard to possession during the pendency of the suit. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 01.09.2009 mamta-II