l EHGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASF UR Wrig yetigon (S) 1N). 3964 of 2MB x Dharmenéra Tanciiya S/o Shri RP. Tamiiya, aged about 36 years, occupation service, posied a3 Patwari Haka No. 26 Toynar, Tahsil Bijapur, Distt. Bijapur (CG). VERSUS . Th6 State of Chhattisgarm through the Secretary Department 0f Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Coiiccior, Bijapur, Dk's'fi. Bijapur (CG). Sub Divisional Officer (Revcnue) Bijapur, Distt. Bijapur {CG}. 4‘ Talisiidar Bijapur, Distt. Bijapur (CG). (WRIT PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF T:fE CONS THUTION OF INDIA} ($3: HcnWIJe Mr. Satisil K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : r Dr. Sanjeet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner, L)g» i)x S'mi Arum Sao, Gcvi. Advocaic for the State/respondents. 0m 0Rmm (Passea. an 24m day muggy, 2mm) . With the consent ot'the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing tinaiiy. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide transfer order ciated 25.06.2007 (Annexure W1 }, the petitioner has been transferred from Patwari Hatka N0. 26 Toynar; Tansit & Distt. Bijapur to Distt. Bastar. He further submits that the Hamster order date 25.06.2007 has not been eompiied with as the petitioner has not been relieved from the oid ptace ot‘posting to gem new place ofposting. Q) .- Be that as it may, it is heyond ones comprehension as to why transfer order which are passed in the puhiéc interest and administrative exigency, has not been given effect to immediately. Since this fatis within the'jnrisriietion of administration, it is net appropriate to interfere with the same. However, the respondents are expected to give effect to the transfer order dated 23.06.2007 as eariy as possibie. With the above Observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 7'7: Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Eahu PETITIONER RESPGNDENT " S