Cr.MMO No. 183 of 2009 04.01.2010 Present:- Ms. Neena Guleria, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. A.K.Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P.Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No.4. The dispute is with respect to a particular house. According to learned counsel for the petitioner the house is on Khasra No.258 and she has also submitted that according to other side, the house is on Khasra No. 257. But the fact remains that the dispute is with respect to the house whether it is on Khasra No. 258 or on Khasra No. 257. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the suit has been filed by respondent No.1 Nand Lal with respect to property in question and that suit is pending. The findings of the Civil Court would be binding on the parties. The learned Sessions Judge has recorded a finding that there is no illegality in the order of the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate when he dropped the proceedings under Sections 107/150 Cr.P.C. on 7.12.2005 after the expiry of six months. The - 2 - learned Sub Divisional Magistrate vide order dated 10.1.2006 has held that instead of he himself deciding the dispute under Section 145 Cr.P.C., it will be more appropriate if the matter is adjudicated by the Civil Court. The learned Sessions Judge has rightly appreciated the material on record. There is no error of jurisdiction. The learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to make out any case, resultantly, the petition is dismissed. January 4, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ) (GR) Judge.