HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4062 OF 2009. DATED 17TH OCTOBER, 2009. Between Amara Prabhakar …Petitioner and Maddineni Venugopal naidu …Respondent. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4062 OF 2009. ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of CPC is directed against the order dated 29.04.2009 made in E.P.No. 211 of 2007 in O.S.No. 2 of 2002 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Pottisreeramulu Nellore District. When the respondent/decree holder filed Execution Petition for sale of the E.P. Schedule property, the petitioner/Judgment debtor filed counter stating that the schedule property is an apartment and prior to the filing of the suit, plots were sold by the partners of the firm and that the schedule property is not an individual property and it is a firm by name M/s. B.V. S. Constructions and that the Judgment Debtor is having 31 paise share in the said firm. It was further stated that Execution Petition is liable to be dismissed since 31 paise share is not obtained by the judgment debtor separately. Considering the rival submissions, the Executing Court held that the Decree Holder/respondent can sale the share of the Judgment Debtor/petitioner in the E.P. Schedule shown to an extent of 31 paise. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision petition is filed by the judgment debtor. The learned Counsel for the petitioner/judgment reiterated the same stand as was taken in the Execution Petition. He submits that unless and until 31 paise share of the petitioner is obtained separately, Execution Petition cannot be ordered. The amount for realization in the Execution Petition is Rs.2,13,616/-, whereas, according to the petitioner, he owns more than one plot in the apartment. The objection raised before the Executing Court shows dishonest on the part of the petitioner. I am of the opinion that the trial Court has not committed any error in rejecting the objection raised by the petitioner-judgment debtor. The Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly the same is dismissed. No order as to costs. ------------------------ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU DATED 17TH OCTOBER, 2009. Msnr.