THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.366 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.6226 of 2011 challenging the proceedings, dated 14.02.2011, through which he was required to stop the construction. Interim order was passed on 10.03.2011 directing that the respondents shall not demolish any structures in H.No.12-13-705/9/A, SSR Enclave, Tarnaka, Lallaguda, Secunderabad. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have demolished part of the compound wall despite the interim order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The dispute is about the existence or otherwise of a passage. The petitioner enclosed certain area with compound wall. The neighbours are said to have complained that the petitioner has encroached certain area connecting the road. Obviously, the respondents felt that the compound wall ought not to have been constructed. Before demolishing the compound wall, they ought to have put the petitioner on notice. Be that as it may, no damage as such was caused to the main building. What is demolished is a small portion of compound wall. Even now, the layout can be verified. Hence, the contempt case is closed by directing that the respondents shall verify the area where the petitioner constructed the compound wall with reference to the approved layout. If it emerges that the petitioner did not encroach any lane shown in the layout, it shall be open to him to construct the compound wall at the place where it existed. On the other hand, if it emerges that the area concerned is part of any lane, he shall not be entitled to do so. It shall be open to the affected parties to approach a Court of law, if they are so advised. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.29.04.2011. kdl