THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11537 of 2010 Date: 1.6.2010 Between: Nunna Grama Raithu Kuli Samkshema Sangam ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh Through Collector, Krishna District, Machilipatnam and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Not present Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 5 : G.P. for Fisheries The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 11537 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “To issue an appropriate writ or order or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in passing the impugned proceedings of Cr. No. A2/625/09/DCRR, dated 4.5.2010 confirming the impugned orders of the 2nd respondent vide proceedings Cr. No. A3/1646/2009, dated 07.11.2009 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to carry on the toddy business in respect of Toddy Cooperative Society Kondayapalli Village, Doma Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the enquiry regarding the power of the State Task Force Inspection on 23.5.2009 and pass such other order or orders.” At the hearing, Sri B. Sai Ram Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded that under Section 63(2) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968, the petitioner has an effective remedy of an appeal to the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise against the order passed by Respondent No.1, which is impugned in this writ petition. In view of the availability of an efficacious, alternative remedy, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy at his discretion. If the petitioner files such an appeal, the appellate authority shall dispose of the same expeditiously. No costs. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 1st June, 2010 pnb