\\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRi RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J. r* Q -^ ^ Applicants Appellants Non-appljcants Respondents M.C.C.No. 312 of 2011 1 Smt Subhash Bhardwaj, aged 28 years, W/o Late Sri Balkali Bhardwaj 2 Ku. Pushpa Bhardwaj, D/o Late Balkali Bhardwaj, aged 13 years 3 Arvind Kumar Bhardwaj, s/o Late Balkali Bhardwaj, aged 10 years 4 Ku. Archana Bhardwaj, d/o Late Balkali Bhardwaj, aged 5 years 5 Ajay Kumar Bhardwaj, s/o Late Balkali Bhardwaj, aged 3 years 6 Jageshwar Bhardwaj, S/o Late Khaaghari Bhardwaj, aged 58 years Ail R/o Village - Akharpali Tahsil Korba, PS Korba Distt Bilaspur (MP) Now Distt Korba, Chhattisgarh Versus 1 Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation throygh its Managing Director of Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Deveiopment Corporation, Raipur (CG) 2 Kaliram, S/o Faguram Vishwakarma, aged 32 years, Driver, Rajnandgaon, Motor Stand, Occupation, M.P.S.R.T.C. Workshop, Raipur C.G. ApDlication for restoration ofMCC No.229 of2011 Present : Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsel for the petitioners. ,^' ..^' 1., MCC.No. 312 of 2011 N tl-^ ORDER £th (15InSeptember,2011) The following order of the Qourt was passed by RajeevGupta,C.J. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 2) The petitioners are seeking restoration of MCC No.229 of 2011 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 25.04.2011. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners' counsel on 25.04.2011, when MCC No.229 of 2011 was taken up for hearing was based on bona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C. No. 312 of 2011, therefore, is allowed and MCC No.229 of 2011 is restored to its original number. nimmi Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge