IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13598 of 2009 1. NITU KUMARI W/O SRI HANUMANT LAL VILL.- NARSAND, P.S.- HASPURA, DISTT.- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) 2. Hanumant Lal, Add-Do- :------ Petitioners. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS MINISTARY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE C.R.P.F., GROUP CENTRE, HYDRABAD, DISTT.- HYDRABAD, STATE- ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE C.R.P.F., GROUP CENTRE, A- LANKA, BANGALORE, DISTT.- BANGALORE, STATE- KARNATAKA 4. THE COMMANDENT 110, BATALIAN C.R.P.F., SUBHASH NAGAR, DISTT.- NIZAMABAD, STATE- ANDHRA PRADESH, PRESENT ADDRESS- 110, BATALIAN, C.R.P.F., LANEPURA, DISTT.- AWANTIPUR (JAMMU KASHMIR) 5. THE COMPANY COMMANDER, E/COMPANY- 110 BATALIAN C.R.P.F., P.O.- KATA RAM (POLICE STATION), DISTT.- KARIM NAGAR, STATE- ANDHRA PRADESH ----------- 4. 04.01.2010. Counsel for the petitioners has filed supplementary affidavit in paragraph 2 whereof he has given the names of six constables who have been promoted ignoring the claim of the petitioners although the eclipse caused by punishment of censure imposed on them is already over. 2. Having heard counsel for the petitioners and the Union of India, I direct the competent authority, namely, Respondent No.4 to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion, as early as possible, in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 3. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)