: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7986 OF 2006 Phakira S. Sadafule ....Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.A. Rajashirke i/b Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the Petitioner. Mr.P.P. Kakade, AGP for Respondent No.1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C. : 1. The Petitioner had come earlier to this Court. This Court by an order passed in Writ Petition No.3096 of 1999 on 19.6.2000 permitted the Petitioner to make a fresh application and the same was to be considered by the Committee. The Petitioner thereafter made a fresh application and the same to be considered. The Petitioner was informed by the communication on 23.2.2006 that he had been unable to produce necessary documents set out therein and as said the request was rejected. 2. This is purely a finding of fact. It is not the case of the Petitioner that he had produced the : 2 : documents. No interference is called for in the exercise of our extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence the Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)