CRM-M No. 23615 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: January 07, 2011 1. CRM-M No. 23615 of 2010 Ajay Kumar vs. State of Haryana 2. CRM-M No. 24708 of 2010 Sandeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana 3. CRM-M No. 27119 of 2010 Kiran Kumar vs. State of Haryana 4. CRM-M No.28414 of 2010 Randeep Singh vs. State of Haryana Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, Mr. Bipan Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Garg, Advocate, Mr. J.S.Mehandiratta, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate for the complainant. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This order shall dispose of CRM-M Nos. 23615, 24708, 27119 and 28414 of 2010 since they all emanate from the allegation that these four petitioners along with one Prem Tyagi made embezzlement of approximately ` 1.14 Crores for a period from 01.04.1999 to 31.03.2008. CRM-M No. 23615 of 2010 2 The sum and substance of the arguments raised by various learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is to the effect that their individual client(s) have been subsequently arraigned without any specific misdemeanour. All of them have argued that their client(s) did not had any role in the embezzlement. Interestingly, the embezzlement itself has not been denied. It is not disputed that apart from these five there was no other employee of the society. Similar application of Manager Prem Tyagi bearing CRM-M No. 21912 of 2010 has been rejected as far back as on 25.08.2010. I find no difference in these cases from that case. Consequently the above said bail applications are dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 07, 2011 sunita