1 62 chs.299.2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION srk CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 299 OF 2010 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 325 OF 2000 IN SUIT NO.3920 OF 1993 Suraj K. Masand & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Satish M. Upadhyaya .. Defendants And Commissioner of Income Tax-20, Mumbai ... Intervener Applicant. .... Mr. Deepak Y. Chitnis for the plaintiffs. Ms. Sarika Mehra i/b L.J. Law for the defendants. Ms. Suchitra Kamble for intervener applicant in support of Chamber Summons. .... CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 27TH APRIL, 2010 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. In my view, no direction can be issued by the Court to the plaintiff or defendant to pay the dues of the Income Tax. The Income Tax Act, 1961 provides machinery for recovery of the tax dues of an Assessee. The Tax Authorities are free to pursue 2 62 chs.299.2010.doc the remedies available under the Income Tax Act, 1961 or the rules framed thereunder. 3 With these observations the Chamber Summons is disposed of. [ D.G. KARNIK, J. ]