1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.08.2011 Coram The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R.BANUMATHI and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.RAJENDRAN Contempt Petition No.829 of 2011 D.Sivakumar .. Petitioner Vs Mariyam Barjana Shadhiq Revenue Divisional Officer Dharmapuri Dharmapuri District. .. Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.18663 of 2010 dated 08.09.2010. For Petitioner .. Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondent .. Mr.M.Venugopal, Spl.Govt.Pleader (CS) ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by R.BANUMATHI, J.) Alleging willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated dated 08.09.2010 made in W.P.No.18663 of 2010, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition. 2. We have heard Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Venugopal, Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. In the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Order dated 08.09.2010 made in W.P.Nos.18662 and 18663 of 2010, we have directed the authority – respondent to consider the case as per the documents and pass orders. The Order reads as under: "4. Taking into consideration the petitioners have made applications as early as 15.12.2008 and 14.07.2008 respectively, we direct the respondent to consider the above said applications of the petitioners and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order, the authority will independently consider the case as per the documents and evidence to be adduced by the petitioners, after holding due enquiry and giving opportunity to the petitioners. The petitioners shall also send a copy of the applications along with a copy of this order. The writ petitions are ordered accordingly. No costs." 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent has not considered the matter and passed orders within the time stipulated by this Court and thereby committed disobedience of the Order. 4. When the Contempt Petition was posted for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent has submitted that the Order of the Division Bench dt.8.9.2010 has been duly complied with and to that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 effect, he produced the proceedings of the respondent in Na.Ka.5702/2010(A4) dated 22.08.2011 and a copy of which is also furnished to the petitioner. 5. Inasmuch as our order dated 08.09.2010 has been complied with, though belatedly, we do not find any willful disobedience of the Order inviting continuance of the Contempt Proceedings and the Contempt Petition is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings in accordance with law. SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2011. COURT OFFICER (O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the orders/judgments/Decrees in this format. KS(CO) SMV/22/09/2011 To R.D.O., Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/