E'B ^:, 9'^ APPT.irr'ANTS APPUCANTS (No. 1 to7 were pennonei'sNo. to ^G. 27- wsre ReviewFetiuOiiNo.7_of2008 1. Smt. Somwati Arora, aged 90 yrs. Wd/o late Sliri Bodhraj Arora, R/o Naharpara, Raipur, GG. 2. Smt Kuma.ribai Khetpal, aged 50 yrs. w/o Sbri Mulchand, r/o Byron Bazar, Raipur. 3. Dr. Raindeo Mandhani, aged 43 yrs. s/o late Shri Gordhandas, r/o Shaiiendra Nagar, Raipur. 4. Amarial Klietpal, aged 52 yrs. S/o Shri Mamkinal, r/o Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, CG. VERSUS 1. Smt. Vijay Laxini Sharma, aged about 55 years, Wd/o late Govind Prasad Shanna, resident of Deepak House, Jalgrih Marg, Tikrapara, Raipur, CG. 2. Deepak Sharma, s/'o of iate shri Ram Gopal Shamia, aged about 28 years r/o Deepak House, Jalgrih Marg, Raipur CG. 3. Prakash Shamia, s/o late Shri Ram Gopal Sharma, aged aboirt 27 yrs. r/o Deepak House, Jalgrih Marg, Tifcrapara, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur, CG. 4. Smt. Ashalafa ?>.4ighra, W/o 8'iri Jagdamba Prasad Mislira, D/o Late Shri Ram Gopa3 Shanna, aged about 45 years, resident of 13-B Babaram Ghosh Laae, Kolkata 5, tehsil and district Koklata, W.B. 5. Smt. Hemlata Shanna, W/o late Dr. Yogesh Sharma,d/o Sliri Ram Gopal Sharma, aged about42 yeafs, resident ofDeepal House Jalgrih Marg, Tita-apara, tahsil aad dist. E-aipur CG. 6. Snit. Pushpalata Chaturvedi, W/'o Sliri Ramesh Chndra Chaturvedi, D/o Sliri Rani Gopal Sfaaraia, aged about 38 yeai^, Deepak House, Jalgrih Marg, Tikrapara, tahsil & digtrict Rjiipur, CG. 7. Smt. Premlata Vashishtha, w/o Shri Krishna Kant Vashislitha, d/o late Sbjri Rani Gopal Shamia, aged about 36 years, resident of Deepak House, Jalgiih Marg, Tikrapara, tahsil & district Raipiir, CG. 8. Raipur Municipai Corporatui, RDA Section, Raipur CG. 9. The State of Chhattisgarh tlirougli the Chief Secretary, DK Singh Bhawan, Secretariat, Raipur, CG. 10. Smt. Kunwar Bai Yadu w./o not hiown, piot No.C-3, C-4, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 11. Smt. Godawa" Bai, w./o not kno'vn, plot No. C-17, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur C.G. 1 l.A. Bharat VAlechha, s/o Shri Hridaram, aged ahout 32 years. ll.B. Amit vralechua, s/o Shfi Hridaraai, aged about 29 yeacs. Both residents ofPiiraiii Basti, Raipur. 12. Bairaj Singh Chauhan s/o not known, aged about 30 yrs. Resident ofPension Bada, Raipur CG. 13. Shri Gurbachan Singh Rai, old Sales Tax QfiRce Compound GE Road, Raipur CG. 14.8mt. Sudha Shukla C/o Viuod Kumar Shukla, Prof Agricultiire College, Raipur CG. 15. SSiri Babulal Shrivastava, Plot No. C-21, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur CG. 16. Nand Kishore Tiwari, S/o Shri S.P.Tiwari, 26, Vivekanand (..- Colony, Raipur, CG. 17. H.S. Paraskar, at Plot No. D-251, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur CG. 18. S.S. Rajput, resideat of Jhatka Shop, Lendi Talab, Raipiir CG. 19. Kanhaiyalal s/o not knowu, plot No. D-248, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, CG. 20. Snit. DayaBai,atplot D-249, ShailendraNagar, RaipurCG. 21. G. Abbas, C/o LIC oflndia, Divisional Qffice, P.B. No. 10, Pandri, Raipur ,CG. 22. Smt. Sheela Bai, w/o Shri Laxman Das, Katora Talab, Raipur C.G. 23. Smt. Pushpa Devi, w./o Mohan Lal, aged about 45 yeans, c/'o Bajaj Travelling House, Near Jairam TaBdes, Raipur CG. 24. Amrit Rao Magar s/o Mohan Rao Magar, Marathapara, Dhamtari, Raipur, C.G. 25. Manoharial S/oNarayan-Das, aged about40 yeara, c/o Baba Hardasrain General Stores, Baiijari Chovrfs, Raipur, G.G. 26. Narayan Das, s/o late Shri Shvaldas, C/o Baba Hardasram General Stores, Banjari Chowk, C.G. 27. Smt. Shanti Devi Pandey, Plot No. D-252, ShaUendra Nagar, Raipiir C.G. (Application for review under ordei' 47 Rnle l ofCode ofCivil Pi'ocedure) CSB: Hon'MeMr.SatishK.Aeiuhotri. J.) Present : Sfari Bhishm Kingat-, Advocate for the petitioners: None for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 20th ofFebnuuy, 2008) 1. Shri Bhislim Kingar, leamed couiisel appearing for tfae review petitioaers subnrits that the review petitioners coiifme their review to the extent df grant of similar benefits as granted to therespondents No. 3 to 20. The review petitioners herein were interveners in W.P. No. 1177/1985. The intervenera in the course ofthe argiiments did not take any stand, however, adopted the contentions oftlie leaiied couiisel appearing for the respondents No.3to20. 2. It is well settled principal of law that the interveners have no right to claun any reliefin the petition. The iiiterveners can either support case ofthe petitioner or for the respondents, therefore, it is not necessary to deal with the interveners separately as tfaeir grievances were ideirtical to that ofthe respondents No. 3 to 20. Since tfae interveners are similariy situated like respondents No. 3 to 20, they are entitled to the same relief. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, this review petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sahu satis^sd/: ^fntt Otfi