1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CAF No.2439/2010 in FA No. 979/2010 Sayyad Nazir Sayyad Nafiz Vs. Pir Mohammad Haji Sheikh Mohammed and another. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. A. M. Ghare, Adv. for the appellant. Mr. S. P. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondent. C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK, J. DATED : 21st DECEMBER 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that similar injunction as prayed by prayer clause (i) was not operating in favour of the appellants in the trial Court. Hence, the prayer made in the civil application cannot be granted as in case the respondent alienates the property or creates any third party interest during the pendency of appeal, the said transaction may be hit by principles of lis pendence. C. A. is disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar.