The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.18973 of 2009 Dated 3rd June, 2010 Between: Gokula Padma …Petitioner And The APSRTC, rep. by its Regional Manager and 2 others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.K.Mahesh for Mr.G.Ravi Mohan Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr.K.Madhava Reddy, SC for APSRTC Counsel for respondent No.3: --- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd respondent in not initiating any action against the 3rd respondent for performing second marriage as the same is illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 3rd respondent in pursuance of Regulation 25 of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Regulation 1963.” Sri K.Mahesh, representing Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.24795 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 3rd June, 2010 lur