1F: 2005 N.“ wk.” .(‘ u v..‘\,,rm,.r_r.(,.r.i .., 4 wm Nam-«w, mm (Wu) ' ammm mmmm F . '§fg‘€t awifhqm FETWONERS: 1. Am! Bagga, $/o Shri Harbamh La! Bagga, Aged about 3O years, thraugh Power of Attorney Saurabh Bagga, 3/0 $hri Harbansh Lal Bagga, Aged abeut 24 years, RIO Bagbahra, TahsH & District Mahasamund (CG) 2. Rashmi Bagga, Wfc Aim Bagga: through Fewer of Attorney Saurabh Baaaa S/o Shri Harbansh La! Bagga: Aged about 24 years, Ric) Bagbahra, Tahsii & District Mahasamund (CG) RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Genera} Administration Deoartmeni, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipuMCG) . 2‘ CoHeotor, Mahasamund, District 1 Mahasamund (CG) i 3. Food Officer, Mahasamund, Dis‘zrict Mahasamui’id {CG} I 4. Surendra Kamar Jaiswai, Dy. i Secretary, Urbao Deveiopment i ‘ Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 5. Niharika Baiik Singh, Collector, Disirici Mahasamund (CG) g 5i RK. Kashyap, Food Officer, District : itiahasamund (CG) i 7. Unien cf india, Through ihe K"\ Grievances, Pension & Personnel Department of Personne! & Training, Khan Market, New Deihi. k $inqie Banch: Hon’bie $hri Dhirendfa Mishra. J. 10-8-2069:- Shri Prateek Sharma, con nsei for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deput? Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No1 to 3‘ Shri Kasif Shakeei, Centre! Govtgsmnding Counsel for respondent No7. Heard on LA. No.2, appiication for amendment in the cause titte. The application is allowed and counsel for the petitioners is directed to carry out amendment in the petition during the course of the day. The petitioners have fiiefd this petition for direction to respondent No.2, Coilector of Mahasamunclito accept the aooiications of the petitioners and decide the same within the stipulated period. Learned counse! for the petitioners submitted that confiscation orooeeding in relation to the trucks beionging to the petitioners seized in connection with offence under section Essential Commodities Act is pending in the Court of Coliector and show cause notice of Annexure-P/2 has been issued to petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.1 after receiving show cause notice has submitted appiications before the Coiiector, however, the Coiiector has refused to accept any appiicatioh presented on behaif of the petitioners in 4 cases. in the circumstances, theiCoiiector, Food Section, Mahasamund may i i i , i A .._.. Www LJ, W s wnwaeamx WW W 200 Maw am mm mm (ma) mm swim __,-_ of EWWW WW“ aiax‘fw aw Secretary, Ministry of Pubiic Wm (néwslbawm mm (W21) mm%qi$ ammm manm m ¢ b WW§§€TW %H aimm ..... be difec‘ted ta accept the appii ations fiied an behaif 0‘? the petétioners and dacide the same in accordance with iaw. Learned counsel §or the State submitied thai he has no objectior: if the instant petmon is disposed fwiih the aforesaid direction. in View of the submissi s made by learhed counsel for the parties, the instant petition is dispceed of with liberty to the petitioneis to fiie fresh application before the conce ed Coiiector in the food cases parading against the petitioners and on s ch appiication being filed, the same shaii be considered and decided by th concerned authorities in accotdance with iaw. f'i i sit/— « Dhirendm Mishra Judge Ben/e