(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 3144 of 2009 The Vice Chancellor, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, & Another. .. Petitioners. versus Shri Balchand s/o. Nanu Rathod. .. Respondent. .................. Mr. S.D. Shelke, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.R. Choukidar, Advocate, for the respondent. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 22ND JUNE 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 21st February 2009, passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the University and College Tribunal, Aurangabad, in Appeal No. BAMU-03/2008, thereby allowing the appeal filed by the respondent, setting aside the order of dismissal and remanding the matter with a direction to hold fresh enquiry. (2) 2. Mr. S.D. Shelke, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the Tribunal has not considered the evidence of handwriting expert in proper perspective and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in law. 3. The Tribunal has given sound and cogent reasons for holding that the enquiry conducted by the Enquiry Officer was not proer and, as such, found remand to be necessary. 4. No perversity could be found with the approach adopted by the Tribunal, so as to warrant interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/wp3144