IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38959 of 2010 1. MEENA DEVI 2. MUKESH KUMAR 3. MANJU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 30.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are in-laws other than husband of the informant, alleged for causing torture upon the informant but as submitted for the demand of dowry also while the marriage is solemnized in the year 1998.Informant is mother of two children of 11 years and 8 years. She is residing with her husband in Delhi. Petitioners can be alleged for advising him, but that also cannot be justified as husband has already filed a Matrimonial Case No.26/2010 for restitution of conjugal right which further goes to show the differences in between wife and husband. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sikarahana at Motihari in connection with Dhaka Pachpakari P. S. Case No.48/2010,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)