(3 ^ r\Q^ L..-' BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C)NO. ^\^ / 2011 PETITIONER / ...-• ^ \%^r ^ b^^^"~...^ f. » -- ^y5^' <<*s-'~ -/••" RESPONDENTS Pradeep Kumar, S/o. Shri Banarsi Das, Aged about 41 years, R/o. PatthalgoanjT Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, IVIantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) /2.Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) ,/3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA V PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C)NO. 7181 OF 2011 Pradeep Kumar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others '^\ ~' (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State with Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, is also present. ORDER (Passed on this 01 day of December, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel forthe parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, learhed Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by the Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court,submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, which without affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been withdrawn by subsequent notice dated 26.11.2011 . A copy of the said notioe is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, aGcording to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition foradjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. TheNagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unauthorized structure, as the same is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the cases of the persons concerned. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ashok