ii^'sS?^ ^ /' HIGH COURTJiFCHHAmSGARH. BIU^SPUR WRTT PETITION (C l N0.1260/2010 PETmONER Smt. Sindhu Shukla. agal alaout48 years, W/o Shri Suryakant Shukla, R/o t28, Hanuman N^ar, near Katlbadi Chowk Raipur (C.G.) Vereus RESPONDENT Regional Transport Authortty, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDtA Appearance: ' Mr. Santosh-Gupta, Counselforthepetittoner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, PanelLawyer forthe respondent. - ORALORDER ^—-^ (26.03.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard finally wifti the consent of the parties. Petitioner- Smt. Sindhu Shukla has fited this patition for issuance of necessary direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur to consider and decide her appUcation for grant of regular stage carri^e permit on the route Rajim to Raipur vla Nayapara, Abhanpur, Mana Basti and back 4 sin^e trip daily. According to the petltioner, the appli<ati<m for grant of permit has been filed on 06.10.2008 and no decision has been taken till date. Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that if the application has been filed by the petitioner for grant of regular stage carriage permft and the same has not been dlsposed of till date, the Regienat Transport Auttiorrty shall tlispose of the same at the eariiest in accordance with law. WRFT PETITION (Cl N0.1280^810 In vtew of the above submisstons nade by learned Panel Lawyer^or the respondent, tMs petltion is dtsposed crf with a dirastlon that if the concerned R^ional Transport Authority has not declded the application dated 06.10.2008 filed bythe petitioner for grant of regular stage camage permtt for the above route till date, the same shatt be disposed of in accordance with taw, as eariy as posslble, prefeobly within a period of 10 weete from the date of pr<xtucti<xi of a eeitified copy of this order by the petttioner before thesaid authortty. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petifion stands finally disposed of. _—— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge shyna