IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2340 OF 2003. OF MOTION NO. 2340 OF 2003. OF MOTION NO. 2340 OF 2003. IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 3619 OF 1997 NO. 3619 OF 1997 NO. 3619 OF 1997 Tiju Giri & Anr. ] .. Plaintiffs Versus Panchan Giri. ] .. Defendant Mr.Anil Mishra for plaintiffs. None for defendant. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 12TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C. : 1. Heard. This Notice of Motion has been taken out by the applicant-plaintiff for practically executing the Consent Decree passed between the parties dated 6th February, 1998 for running the business. Another prayer is for appointment of Receiver under Order 40 for taking possession of the suit premises and to implement the said Consent Decree. Admittedly, all these prayers are after the Consent Decree in question. : 2 : 2. The Notice of Motion, therefore, is not entertainable. Parties are at liberty to take appropriate steps according to law. This Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] [srpasha@hc]