IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 125 of 2007 Dr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, S/o Sri Ram Niwas Sharma, R/o 177 A Ashutosh Nagar, Nehru Marg, rishikesh, District Dehradun. ….Petitioner Vs. Smt. Manisha Panwar, Secretary, Medial and Health, State of Uttarakhand, Dehradun (Amended). …….Respondent Sri Tapan Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned brief holder of the respondent. Dated: -11-10-2007 Hon’ble B.S. Verma , J. Heard. By means of this contempt petition, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondent for flouting the order dated 22-6- 2006 passed in Writ Petition No.309 of 2004 (S/B), Dr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Uttaranchal. The Division Bench of this Court passed an order on 22-6- 2006 that:- “However, the petitioner is directed to move a fresh representation along with the certified copy of this judgment passed by this Court before the respondent No.1 and respondent No.1 is directed to disposed for the representation of the petitioner by speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.” Learned brief holder of the respondent made a statement at bar that he order has been complied with. The compliance order has been annexed along with Counter affidavit and it reveals from the order dated 13-7-2007 that the representation of the petitioner has been decided by speaking order. The contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notices are hereby discharged If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order, which has been passed on the representation, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum as provided under the law available to the petitioner. All applications stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma,J) M.K.