IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13650 of 2006 PROF.DR.KRISHNADEO SINGH son of Late Suresh Prasad Singh, resident of House No.84, Nawab Colony, Tilkamanjhi (Police Line Road), P.S.-Tilkamanjhi, (Kotwali), Town and District-Bhagalpur …….. …….. Petitioner Versus 1.The T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, through its Registrar 2.The Vice Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 3.The Registrar, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 4.The Finance Officer, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5.The Headmaster of the Department, Post Graduate Department of Political Science, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 6.The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 7.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Deptt. of Finance Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 8. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Deptt. of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 9.The Director, Deptt. of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna ……… ……… Respondents ----------- 11. 25.4.2011. Mr.Purushottam Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Mr. Anil Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 5 and Mr. Equbal Asif Neyazi, learned A.C. to G.P.-4, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition save and except prayer for merger of 50 dearness relief in his basic pension other grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. It was submitted by Mr. Jha that the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan & Ors. Vs. T. M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur) and other connected writ petitions. It was further submitted that so far as amount of group insurance is concerned, the petitioner may be granted liberty to file 2 representation before the authority concerned. The submission of Mr. Jha has not been refuted by learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case the writ petition, so far as merger of dearness relief on basic pension is concerned, is allowed in terms of the order dated 3.12.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan & Ors. Vs. T.M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur). So far as prayer of the petitioner for filing representation for the amount of Group Insurance is concerned, prayer is allowed. The petitioner may file appropriate representation before respondent no.2 i.e. the Vice Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. If such representation is filed, it is expected that respondent no.2 will examine the same and pass order in its right perspective without any delay preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)