IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 11TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4805 of 2010() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.130/2010 OF CHIRAYINKEEZH POLICE STATION) CMP.4776/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I,ATTINGAL .................... PETITIONER/A 8 ---------------------------------- NAZARUDHEEN @ AYILAM NAZEER, S/O.MUHAMMED SHAFI,THEKKEVILA VEEDU, AYILAM DESOM, MUDAKKAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HIRTHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.4805 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2010 ORDER The petitioner who is the 8th accused in Crime No.130/2010 of Chirayinkeezh Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 342, 365, 395 I.P.C. & Section 27 of Arms Act, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 10/2/2010. The petitioner was arrested on 28/7/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj