THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.17545 of 2009 Dated 15th June, 2011 Between: Sai Abhilash …Petitioner And Central Board of Secondary Education, Regional Office, New No.3 (Old No.1630-A), ‘J’Block, 16th Main Road, Anne Nagar (West), Chennai, rep.by its Regional Officer and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri C.Raghu Counsel for respondent No.1: Smt.A.Chaya Devi The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the Proceedings No.(M)/CORRN/REJECTION/2009/278, dated 16.07.2009, issued by the 1st respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Examination Bye-laws of the 1st respondent and set aside the same and further direct the respondents to correct the name of the father of the petitioner appearing in the Records of the Respondents from Sri Y.S.Rao to Sri L.V.Keshava Murthy.” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri C.Raghu, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to file a fresh writ petition questioning the Regulation of respondent No.1, based on which, the petitioner’s application for change of name was rejected. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.23013 of 2009 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th June, 2011 VGB