IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. 36459-M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : JANUARY 14, 2010 SUBEG SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNAJB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. SPS Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 438, Code of Criminal Procedure, for grant of bail in FIR No.179 dated 4.11.2009 under Sections 307, 324, 323, 341, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sadar Malout, District Muktsar. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is 70 years of age. A simple injury has been attributed to him. Learned counsel for the respondent-State states that the petitioner has joined investigation. The age of the petitioner is 70 years. It has also been confirmed by the learned counsel for the respondent-State that the petitioner has been attributed a simple injury on non-vital part of Criminal Misc. No. 36459-M of 2009 2 the body. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. Order dated 23.12.2009 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions :- i) the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required; ii)the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii)the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. This order shall enure till 10 days after the petitioner receives a notice of filing of final report u/s 173, Cr.P.C, within which period, the petitioner would be at liberty to apply for regular bail. January 14, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?