IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (S/S) NO. 1446 OF 2001 Madan Singh Bisht and another. ………….Petitioners. Versus State of U.P. and others. …….Respondents. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 2 and 3. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos. 1 and 2. A statement has been made by Mr. Alok Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioners at the bar that the instant Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. On the basis of the above statement, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 17.6.2010 Rathour