1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4110 OF 2009 University of Pune ....Petitioner V/s. Sanjay S. Jain ....Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5419 OF 2007 University of Pune & Ors. ....Petitioners V/s. Sanjay S. Jain & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.P.J. Thorat for the Petitioners. Mr.S.G. Aney, Senior Counsel with Mr.J.G. Reddy for Respondent No.1. Mr.P.I. Khemani, A.G.P. for Respondent No2.and 3 (In Writ Petition No. 5419 of 2007. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 29TH JANUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. Mr.Aney has invited my attention to the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Ranjit K. Rajak v. State Bank of India, 2009(5) Bom. C.R., 227. The judgment is indeed relevant not only in this matter but in all similar matters. 2. It is however, not necessary in the present case for me to deal 2 with the judgment and the issues that arise in the above Writ Petitions in view of what has transpired. Mr.Aney states that the Respondent does not desire reinstatement in the Petitioner – University and will not even seek any reinstatement in the Petitioner – University based on the impugned orders. He further states that the Respondent is also not claiming and will not claim back wages awarded by the impugned orders. In view thereof, the Petitioner’s grievances in the Writ Petitions do not survive. 3. The Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of as not pressed.