IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10335/2011-D Decided on:30.11.2011 _____________________________________________ 1. Smt. Ram Devi Gupta wife of Sh. Nand Lal Gupta, Ex. Head Teacher Arki, Tehsil Arki, District, Solan, H.P. 2. Smt. Dhanwanti Gupta wife of late Sh. Hem Raj Gupta, resident of House No. 180, Ward No.8, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. Ex. Centre Head Teacher. 3. Smt. Champa Gupta wife of Sh. Pyare Lal, resident of village Paramehlog, Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, H.P. Ex. Centre Head Teacher. 4. Late Sh. Pyare Lal Gupta through Smt. Champa Gupta Ex. Centre Head Teacher, resident of village Paramehlog, Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, H.P. 5. Smt. Jai Vanti Gupta wife of Sh. S.P. Gupta, resident of Ward No.6 Main Bazar Arki, District Solan, H.P. Ex. Centre Head Teacher. …Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of H.P. through Principal Secretary (Education) with Headquarter at Shimla, H.P. 2. The Director of Elementary Education with Headquarter at Shimla, H.P. 3. The Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Solan, H.P. …Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. 2 Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioners claim that they are entitled to be promoted as Centre Head Teachers with effect from the date their juniors were promoted. It is seen that some incumbents on the identical facts were granted benefits vide judgment Annexure P-1 delivered in CWP (T) No. 4249 of 2008, decided on 10.4.2009. We find that the said judgment has been implemented also as rightly informed by the learned Deputy Advocate General. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of. The petitioners may submit their individual representations to the second respondent giving therein their service particulars and also pointing out the instances where the juniors were promoted. In the event of such representations being filed by the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today, the matter will be duly considered by the second respondent and in case any of the junior had been promoted the petitioners before the Government shall also be given promotion with effect from the date their juniors were promoted. The needful 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3 shall be done within three months thereafter. We make it clear that in case any incumbent junior to the petitioners had been given undue promotion, the second respondent shall review the same with notice to the concerned incumbent(s). The pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 30.11.2011 *awasthi*