1 cra521.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.521 OF 2010 Kamalakar Baburao Khot & Anr. ...Applicants vs. Sulochana Shankarrao Phatale & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Debojyoti Talukdar for the applicants Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for the respondent nos.1 and 2 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 21, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel for the respondents. After arguing the revision application for some time, the learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicants are not pressing the revision application on merits. He submits that considering the fact that family of the applicants is carrying on business in the suit premises for last about 100 years, time of two years and more be granted to vacate. 2 The learned counsel for the respondents opposes the said prayer and submits that maximum time of six months be granted to vacate the suit premises. 3 The present suit has been filed in the year 2000. As the applicants have made a statement that they are not pressing the revision application on merits, the decree for possession will become final. The applicants will have to give usual undertaking to vacate. Considering the fact that the premises are business premises, and the 2 cra521.sxw the business is carried on therein, time of two years deserves to be granted to vacate. 4 Hence, I pass the following order : i) Revision application is dismissed as not pressed. ii)Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, decree for possession shall not be executed till 21st October 2012 subject to condition of the applicants and all adult members of his family filing usual undertakings to vacate the suit premises. iii)If undertakings are not filed within a period of four weeks from today, decree for possession will forthwith become executable. iv)An advance copy of the undertakings be furnished to the Advocate for the respondent. JUDGE