CRM -M No. 33856 of 2011 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM -M No. 33856 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.11.2011 Lal Chand ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present Mr. D. S. Bishnoi, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anmol Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, who is accused in FIR No. 145 dated 2.9.2011, registered under Sections 15, 27-A, 61, 85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station City Jakhal, District Fatehabad. Allegations in the FIR are that on 2.9.2011 one Subhash Chander @ Sunil was apprehended at the spot with poppy husk weighing 40 kgs. Thereafter, on his interrogation, he disclosed name of the petitioner and co-accused Ramu regarding delivery of the poppy husk in question, resulting into registration of case against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Neither the petitioner was apprehended from the spot nor any recovery was effected from him. The disclosure statement made by co-accused, on the basis of which the petitioner has been falsely implicated, has no value in the eyes of law. The prayer is for grant of pre-arrest bail. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that though the petitioner was not arrested from the spot, however, during investigation, it has come on record that recovered contraband was delivered to Subhash @ Sunil by one Ramu son of Gurjant Singh @ Janta CRM -M No. 33856 of 2011 (2) through some unknown person in Car No. HR 15-C-8987. The mobile number of said unknown person was 9813622011. It has also come on record that the petitioner was using that mobile got issued by him in the name of one Vinod son of Hanuman, resident of Village Bejalpur. He further submitted that the petitioner is in the business of selling drugs. The prayer is for rejection of prayer for pre-arrest bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail. Though the petitioner was not arrested from the spot, however, during investigation it has come on record that the petitioner had supplied the poppy husk in question to the other accused. He was using mobile got issued by him in some other name for doing the illegal business of drugs. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 23.11.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge