4 HIGH URT'OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPU ’ . Miscellaneous Appeal No 621 of 2004 APPJC‘ 1. Rlkhl Ram Patel son of Purunshottam age IANTS: . d 45 years Smt Nlrmala DeVI Wife of Rlkhl Ram Patel aged 40 years Both are reSIdent of Vlllage Sondlha Police a > VStatlon Ramkola TahSIl Ramkola Dlstt "' Sarguja (Chhatttsgarh) 1' ' Versus - . Jagdish Kumar son of Peyare'lal’ aged 55 years vehicle owner reSIdent of A—29 Matabadi Gate Dhandu Ram market,‘ Bawana New Delhl . a Ramesh Chandra Jat.s‘on”of Amo Ram: aged 23 years resident Binhana Police Station Mehma Distt. Rohtak ‘Hariyana. National Insurance Company limited ‘Bharati house Third l‘loor 4/24 Asaf Ali . Road New Delhi 110002 f . , ‘35- , {MiScellaneous civil appeal under Section 173 of the Motor:Ve.hicles Act} Present: I’ o Mr J S Baraik counsel for the appellants None present for respondents No 1 & 2 No representation 1s made Mr Raj Awasthi counsel for respondent No Divisio‘n Bench; - V, Hon’ble‘Mr. T.P. Sharma an Hon’ble Mr.:R.N. Chandrakar J d J E;— ORAL ORDER‘ (16-9-201 0) s - T.P harmé, J- By this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 the appellants have challenged the award dated 28 2 2004 passed by the 3' Additionat Motor ACCIdent Claims Tribunal Ambikapur (for short ‘the Claims Tribunal) in Motor Acmdent Claim Case No 32/2002 on the ground of inadequate compensation CO R I - DIONAPPLICANTS: 3 d . A te as e ar nrte th v c de fld l on ac h t of their son Amtt Kuar ad 22 yes w died In moto acetdent on 179 2001 tt tie espondent No1 s drrvrng the oedrg vehrcle tk bearmg egrsratlon No R 4/A 8576 ownd by respodent No 2 ad Insred wrt respond o 3 gaint the carm of Rs1220 00 h Ctarms Trrbunt has ardd compenstion of s per h ce of th pties ufotuna moer & father of Amlt Kumar (sme ceased) have e calm petm on count of te deah m ge ar ho r - At ha m r wa ffnn ruc rt H 6 e ‘ n n u h ent N As l 0/— te a awe a ’ Rs 1 63 ZOO/- . We have hd Ieared coel fr the rtres persed the award f tmpugned a reor of the Calms rlbunal ' . . y ' . . ; “Ff“ V n nsl e lt u at the l d orr a t sessd c o > n t ar cops er e ol espod sus ha a of unmr xpene ou an corct l l a c en e rn c t ul a mup ad ha euct nly 3' penal expense and hreby the Caim Tribuna s warded sufforent “W3 3 Il ' ear n uns o pa u nd cd t T .- .Learned coue for th appelans sbmits th Carms Trrbunal has not applie cect multiplier hs no ase corret mcome f the ‘ deceased ad has no awded adequate menation ; On the oth hand learnd cunse for rnent No 3 opposes the ‘ appeal and bmit tt In case of deth arred son deductron of personal ess wld be 50% d re mutrplrer woud be 10 In cse of larm by parts but In th peset ase he Claims Trrbna has pplied ltilier of 16 n s dded o 1/d for rso s te l l ha a compention sa . 0n peusal recr it revea ha te a bunal h‘as rrey r of od ls tt h Clims Tri COctl co onsiderin t i ’nl t ' ‘ 3d erna n l m s ' fnd any sc fr enhancement I the coatlon awarded by te ope o n mpens h un ly, t aal sam e t b se heey sed N ore as o oss . \ , I V f/ .L,_~—-"> . e I “:w‘vp- nun I assessed inme of the deceased Cg he deducton ofoy V ' > 1/r as psol expenses ad appying the ultiplier of 16 we do not ' , ‘Claims Tribal Consequent he ppe Is dev0Id of merit e Is liabl o e dismisd and It Is rb dismis o dr t ct I , R ' Sd/_ . sofa” 4"’I Sd/- > 'T.P. Sharma RN Chandrakar . Judge l >l -o ,,,Jud_9e I