1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2028 OF 2008 Rampati Ramsurati Goswami ..Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Crown Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. .... Mr. D.K. Ghaisas for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 3rd April, 2008. P.C. : A finding of fact has been arrived at by the Labour Court at Thane that as a matter of fact there was no relationship of employer and employee between the Petitioner and the Respondent. That finding of fact is based on a consideration of all the evidence on the record. The Labour Court has further come to the conclusion that the Petitioner was in fact a labour contractor and a copy of the agreement between the employer and the Petitioner was produced on the record. Though the Petitioner sought to controvert his signatures on the agreement and other documents including his own affidavit, the Labour Court has come to the conclusion that even a bare perusal of the signatures with 2 the signatures on admitted documents will show that the Petitioner had signed the documents. The Petitioner also admitted during the course of the cross examination that he had not filed any documentary proof on record showing that he was working as a jobber since 1st January, 1985 and that he had not filed any documentary proof showing that he has not received all wages. The ultimate finding which has been arrived at by the Labour Court is on the basis of the evidence on record. This Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitutions would not be justified in substituting its own conclusion with the conclusion which has been arrived at by the Labour Court on the basis of the evidence. There is no merit in the Petition which shall accordingly stand dismissed. *****