IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2008 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10916 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.756/2008,IA.797/2008 IN OS.613/2004 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ G. NARAYANA PAI, S/O. GOPALA PAI, VAYALAPURATHU, THIRUMALABHAGOM P.O., THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, PIN-688 540. BY ADV. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THURAVOOR KARSHAKA SANGHOM NO.40/79, CHAVADY, THIRUMALABHAGOM P.O., REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PIN-688 540. 2. N. BALACHANDRAN, ADVOCATE, CHERTHALA (COMMISSIONER IN O.S.613/2004) BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 10916 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of April, 2008. = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = J U D G M E N T This writ petition is preferred against the order of the Munsiff Court, Cherthala in I.A.Nos.756 and 797 of 2008 in O.S.No.613/2004. I.A.No.756/08 is a petition filed by the Advocate commissioner for disbursing an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- for restoring the electric connection and the other application is for appointment of an assistant and also to fix the fee and travelling allowance of the commissioner. The court after considering the entire matter appointed Sri.K.B.Suresh as the assistant of the advocate commissioner with a remuneration of Rs.1,500/- per month and gave out considerable directions. The court also pointed that the commissioner is permitted to engage Sri. Mathew Alexander as advocate of the sangham till the newly elected management take a decision as to his continuation in the employment. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the administration in the hands of a commissioner cannot be prolonged in the interest of the sangham and therefore W.P.(C).No. 10916 OF 2008 2 prays for an early election to be conducted as per the Rules. In this application I am afraid that I cannot make such a direction to consider the scope of the suit and if a petition for conduct of an election is moved before the court below by any of the parties that may be considered with reference to the subject matter of the suit, the applicability and feasibility and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE bkn/-