IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12988 of 2011 JAY NARAYAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 03.05.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Vigilance. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 11.02.2011 in connection with Vigilance Case No. 12 of 2011 on the allegation that he accepted rupees three thousand as bribe for mutation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order of mutation is passed by the Circle Officer and not by the Karamchari and admittedly, petitioner was working as Karamchari at the relevant time. It is further contended by him that allegation maker is a political person and he got implicated the petitioner in a false case. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for Vigilance opposed the prayer pointing out this fact that without report of the Karamchari, the order of mutation is not possible and the petitioner was caught red handed accepting the bribe as stated above. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. - 2 - 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Vigilance-II, Patna in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 12 of 2011. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )