CF‘m// i IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT- BILASPUR WRIT PgTmoN (S) No. H22 Dr OF 2006 PETITIONER : " P. L. CHANDRAKAR, AGED — 64 YEARS, SON OF BORRA CHANDRAKAR, ‘ . RETIRED As — RURAL AGRICULTURE EXTENSION OFFICER, FROM O/O s. D. O. (AGRICULTURE), TAH. & DISTRICT - DANTEWADA R/O VILLAGE — KATIYARRAS, P. O. — KUPER, DISTRICT — DANTEWADA (C. G.) . VERSUS Qixqm‘y RE$$ONDENTS g :1. STATE OF CHHA‘I—I'ISGARH, THROUGH - THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, / D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR /2/.ACCOUNTANT ‘ THROUGH - ITS GENERLA SENIOR OF ACCOUNTS C.G., OFFICER, 12/27, RAMAN MANDIR WARD, ‘ 'FAFADIH, RAIPUR (C. G.) t A ' Writ Petition U A — 226 & 227 of Constitution of India r g‘ I . XI—HC—78 m w , m , m . LJK?§%?:¥Z. 1H 200é mm (YEW) WW .o Mr. V. Deepak Rm: counsel fm‘ The pzfifioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Depufy Gavf. Advoca‘re for fhe STafe/respondenf No.1, on advance copy. Mrs. BR. Mai‘ry, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. S.K. Beriwal, Cen’rr‘ai Govt Counsel for responder 1‘ No.2, on advance copy. Heard. Main grievance of The pefif oner in This wrif pe‘rifion under Arficies 226 <5: 227 of fhe Cons+i+mion of India is fhai' offer his refiremem‘ even ‘i‘hough he was en‘iii‘led for GPF amoun‘i To fhe Tune of Rs.1,47,775/-, he has been paid oniy Rs.84,531/- on 1-5-2064 and 'ihe remaining amoun'r of Rs.63,244/— has no? been paid. Learned counsei for fhe pefiiioner submifs fha‘i The lei-fer dafed 3-1- 2006 (Annexure P-Z) wrifien by he Sub Divisional Agriouifurai Officer, Danfewada makes if clear fha‘l' on 3-1-2006, fhe 5.0.0. had made i'i clear fha‘l‘ ihe pefifioner is enfi‘rled for urfher amounf of Rs.63,244/- and along wifh the said lei-Tar missing deposif :glips were also affached. However, smée . no order has been passed by r spanden‘r No.2. Learned counsel furfher submifs ‘l'ha‘i' Therefore, The p fi‘l'ioner may be allowed ‘l‘o make a 'represenfai'ion f0 respondeni' No. and responden‘l No.2 be direcfed To decide fhe same, lo which learne counsel appearing for The responden‘l's have no objec‘l‘ion. Having heard learned couns l for fhe parfies, having regard i'o fhe facis and circumsfances of ihe cas ,i'he prayer made by learned counsel for , . P.T.O. WWW WW§WW wmm mwm %a1f%man%:1 _\\v ‘ 14—8-2006 XI-HC-78 Q § H W , W , W Wm..w.$i§iuuu . ‘ ‘ Q37 W zoo/é mm(W) WWW mmm ..l\_ \ WW§$¢W WWW “ 2" %a1f%man%:1 ¥$oma ' ‘rhe pefifioner is just fair and reasonable. Therefore, The pefifioner is ailawed fo make a defaiied represe n‘rm‘ion raising all his grievances annexing a copy of fhis wrif pemion and it; annexures To respondenf No.2 wifhin 15 days from foday and in furn, respondem‘ No.2 is direci‘ed fa consider The case of ihe pefi‘i‘ioner for enfi‘i‘iemenf of fhe remaining GPF amoun‘r alcng wifh infehesf up To fhe dafe of paymeni‘ a1' i‘he usuai mfe of inferes? and pass appropriafe order for final pa/men‘r wi‘rhin a period of 60 days from The da‘re of receipi' of The represenfaf on, in accordance wifh iaw. Wi’fh fhe direcfion aforesaid, fhe pe‘iifion sfands disposed of. Parfies are enfi‘ried for cer-‘ified copy of fhis order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ‘ RT.O. ’