IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 31ST BHADRA 1932 RP.No. 828 of 2010(H) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.13874/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- M.T.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN PILLAI, MELAKOMATTU HOUSE, THAZHAM P.O., MALAYALAPUZHA, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.RAMAN KARTHA SMT.MANJU R.KARTHA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SC SRI. P. GOPAL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.828/2010 in W.P(C) NO.13874/2010 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2010 O R D E R The grievance of the petitioner is that, though the writ petition was disposed directing consideration of the representations, respondents are likely to be influenced by the observations in the judgment. However, a reading of the last paragraph of the judgment itself shows that this court has clarified that the consideration of the representations shall be untrammeled by the observations in the judgment. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the Review Petition. Review Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/