IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12946 of 2006 ABHISHEK PUSHPAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Jha-2, Advocate For the State: Mr. Juhi Kumari, A.C. to S.C.III. ---- 2. 20.4.2010 The petitioner has been emboldened to approach this Court despite the earlier rejection of his writ application, being C.W.J.C. No.9038 of 1995, by order dated 16.1.1997 on the basis of a subsequent decision of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jyoti Kumari vs. The State of Bihar and others: 2005(4) PLJR 507. The case of the petitioner has been rejected by a reasoned order which mentions the facts relevant to the decision which are evidently quite different from the facts in the case of Jyoti Kumari (supra) which is a case confined to that of a dependent whose both parents were at one time in Government service. The present case, in fact, is squarely covered by a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Vishal Kumar vs. The State of Bihar and others: 2004 (2) PLJR 453. In view of the fact that the petitioner’s earlier writ petition has been rejected, the - 2 - present writ petition is not maintainable. In any case, in view of the aforesaid decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Vishal Kumar’s case (supra), the writ application appears to be wholly misconceived and it is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )