IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40515 of 2009 MD.AZIMUDDIN @ APPEAL, Son of Md. Yashin R/o village Bakhri Kol, P.S. S.K.Nagar, District Purnea. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Tabassum Ara, W/o Md. Azimuddin @ Appeal, D/o Md. Semiruddin, R/o Bharaiya, P.s. Phalka, District Katihar …. Opposite parties ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar , Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Indu Bhushan, Advocate ------ 2 26.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and opposite party No. 2. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 2.6.2009 and he is ready to keep opposite party No. 2. with full dignity. Learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 submitted that earlier also a Complaint Case No. 2030 of 2007 has been filed by the informant under 2 Section 498A of Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. In that case a Bench of this Court vide order dated 5.6.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18534 of 2008 has granted provisional bail and remitted the matter to the Court below with direction that if the disputes are settled and the complainant back to the matrimonial home, the bail should be confirmed. Let the certified copy of the order dated 5.6.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18534 of 2008 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner be kept on record. It is stated that, thereafter, the matter was settled and bail was confirmed by the Court below. However, thereafter again the petitioner started torturing the informant leading her to again file criminal case. In that view of the matter I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. This application is dismissed. However, if so advised, the petitioner may renew 3 his prayer for bail after three months. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)