IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2430 of 2009. Decided on: 19th June, 2010. Deep Ram and others. ….. Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioners : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondent department may kindly be directed to grant the work charge status/regularization to the petitioners w.e.f. the year 2003/2004 instead of the year 2007 with all consequential benefits as per the direction of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the interest of justice and fair play.” It is submitted that the case is covered by the decision in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 supp. (2) SCC 316. Therefore, the petitioners may file appropriate representation before the second respondent within two weeks, in which case appropriate action, in the light of the judgment referred to above, shall be taken by the second respondent within another one month. The petitioners may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent. 2 The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 19th June, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr/khem) Judge.