1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5224 of 2011 Sai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal ...Petitioners Versus National Council for Teachers Education Western Regional Committee & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Mihir Desai for Petitioners. Mr. Uday Warunjikar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Ms.S.S.Bhende, AGP for Respondent No.3 CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 11th AUGUST, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent. Mr.Warunjikar waives notice for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Bhende A.G.P. waives notice for Respondent no.3 3. As short question is involved, Petition is taken up for final disposal forthwith, by consent. 2 4. This petition is filed challenging decision dated 11/21st June, 2011 issued under the signature of the Regional Director, National Counsel for Teachers Education, respondent no.1. 5. The said order proceeded on the basis that the petitioner failed to despatch valid land documents within specified time. However, considering the case made out in the petition, which is undisputable, the said ground is non existent ground. In this view of the matter, the respondent no.1 may have to reconsider the proposal of the petitioner forthwith in accordance with law. 6. The petition is disposed of by recording assurance of the respondent no.1 that the petitioner’s proposal will be reconsidered within six weeks from today. 7. No order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)