IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14212 of 2010 NATHO RAI, S/o Harihar Rai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 05.05.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 452, 307 and 326/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail on merits by order dated 29.10.2009. Considering the same, I am not inclined to review the same. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it definitely within nine months in view of the serious nature of the offence. For the reasons of speedy trial the trial court is directed to resort to Sections 62 and 66 Cr.P.C. and also cancellation of bail of the co- accused in case he is on bail if he fails to appear for reasons of misuse of privilege of bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)