IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 3183 of 2006(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.L.JOHNSON, S/O.M.I.LONAPPAN, AGED 55 YEARS, PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER (RETD), HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL, MAPRANAM, (MUTHIPEEDIKA HOUSE, VARAKKARA, THRISSUR-680 325). BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. THE HEADMISTRESS, HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL, MAPRANAM (VIA), IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE FOR R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.3183/06 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF GO(P)NO.380/1994/13/FIN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DT.9.6.94. EXT.P2: COPY OF GO(P)nO.458/1994/FIN. OF THE GOVERNMENT DT.3.8.94. EXT.P3: COPY OF FORM OF EXERCISING OPTION DT.8.9.94. EXT.P4: COPY OF OBJECTION OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR. EXT.P5: COPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.B3-8866/05/N.DIS. OF THE DIS.EDL.OFFICER DT.21.11.05. EXT.P6: COPY OF REPLY OF THE PETITIONER DT.29.8.05. EXT.P7: COPY OF ORDER NO.E3-9987/04 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR. EXT.P8: COPY OF REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONDENTS' EXTS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.3183 of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a retired Physical Education Teacher. He retied from service on 31.3.1995 from the Holy Cross High School, Mapranam. 2. The dispute herein is regarding the audit objection raised as per Exhibit P4. The said audit objection was communicated to the petitioner as per Exhibit P5 and the petitioner submitted a reply as per Exhibit P6. 3. The Deputy Director of Education rejected the reply as per Exhibit P7 and aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed a petition styled as a revision petition before the Government as per Exhibit P8. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that so far no orders have been communicated on Exhibit P8. In Exhibit P8, the petitioner seeks for an order to drop the audit objection raised against his Selection Grade fixation from 5.1.1995. W.P.(C)No.3183/06 -2- 5. In the light of the plea raised by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Exhibit P8 after hearing the petitioner, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment to the Government for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn