/ f $ way ‘ . OQ IN THE HIGH COUgT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WPNO. 2Li6l I‘2001 PEI‘I'IIONERS :’ 1. RBShukla S/o lac Shri ARShukla, Aged about 50 ms, Sub D'visiona] OtiioaEandula, Wm Resom Depannmlt Sub D'vision N03, DSmCt *1 Dng 2 BKShulda, S/o Shli BRShulda, Aged about 45 yam, ,/ _ Sub Fnginea, Tandula, " Wm Rwourow Sub D'viSio No.3 g m .3. AKMxmhjee, S/o Slm' AKMIkhmjee; Aged about 45yw‘s, Sub Elginea'. Tandula, ‘ <’ ('3 Wata Rwom Sub D'vision No.3 . Durg ‘ 4. Kishor Shanta S/o Shri HL.Shmm, Aged about 44 years, Sub Enginea' Tandula, , h Water Raounm Sub D'vision No.3 ‘ '< Dug. /' ' r’ k/sgommmgmh Thr‘cmgh Seaetmy, Wm Rosouroos Depanmmt, DKHIML Raipur. .AVH f ’ 2 ShimmeshPaiila, I-bn’ble Mnista‘, WM Rwourow and E‘nm DepalmLGovt of Chhatiisgam, Raipur. ‘ 3‘ Shri NSEmdoriya, Chief Engnea Mni Nhm Bmgo Project, Elaspur. 4. Sm Adminisuan've Tn'bunal, Raipur Batch Through its ,x RW. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER / Writ Petition No. 2461 of 2001 R.B., Shukla and otters is: State of duhattisgaxh & ors. a?n’ Goran” Hon‘ble Shri Justice K.H. N.Kuranga, C.J. Hon 'ble Shri Jim tice Fakhruddin , J. Present: Shri Prashant Mishra. Adv. o“ For Petitiore rs Dr. N. K. Shukla, Addl. A. G. vd 3! Shri Abhid’xek Sinha, Adv. O R D;'£v R 'lhe following order of the Ootrt was passed by K.H.N.Kuranqa, C.J.- a x 'me petitioners have in wis petition sought for setting aside the ordeB dated 20.11. 2001 passed by the State Administrative Tribunal. Raiyur Bench’ respondent No.4 herein in O.A. No. 1185 of 2001 which has been produced as mnexure- A in the petition and also the order dated 9.11.2001 (Annexure- A/l). It is not <iis uted that ‘as against the order dated 9.11. 2001 (Annexure-A/l) appeal lies to the state Government. 'Iherefore. ; we are HIGH COURT OF QiHATTlSGARH AT BILASPUR For Resporiden ts . K, /..w ¢ of the opinion that with liberty to petitioners to file an appeal against the orders (Annexure—A/l), the petition can be disposed of. It is accordingly disposed of. However. the petitioneBs are at liberty to challenge the order dated 9.11.2001 (Annexure-A/l) before the State Government within one month from today. If such an appeal is filed‘ the State Governmmt would dispose of the appeal on its own merits after hearing the parties within yfe month. If an application for grant of stay is made before the State Qpvernment, the Government would dispose of the same in accordance with law after hearing the parties. No order as to costs. Parties are entitled ,m for certified copy of this order. \‘a \ ‘ 9/14-2-2002. Er ” ’ 371112-2002 ’ \ Sdl- \-/// H SW" f 1 Fakhruddin . "\/ I\ €hief Justine Judge