1 S.B. CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.11/2006. M/S. D.R.D. AGENCY, JODHPUR VS. KRISHANA RAM & ANR. DATE OF ORDER : 10.03.2008. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. B.C. Mehta for the petitioner. By the order dated 25.04.2006, this Court while accepting the appeal preferred by appellant Krishna Ram assailing validity of the award dated 28.07.2003 passed by the sole arbitrator held that the non-awarding of interest can neither be construed to be imperfect or an obvious error because it is a discretionary relief which was open to the Arbitrator to grant or not to grant. The Court while holding the case of non-award of interest, quashed the order passed by the learned District Judge that was relating to grant of interest to the extent of @ 12 per annum. By the instant petition, review of the order aforesaid is sought on the count that as a matter of fact, the case was relating to the award of interest and not to the non-awarding of the interest as held by the Court under the order dated 25.04.2006. It is relevant to note that a review petition was 2 filed by the State Government (SBC Review Petition No.15/2007) angainst an order of similar nature and that came to be rejected by the order dated 15.11.2007, that reads as follows: “S.B.C.RVW No.15/07 State & anr.vs.Poosa Ram & Anr. DATE OF ORDER :- 15.11.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD Mr.JPS Choudhary, for the petitioners. Mr.Rajesh Joshi, for the respondents. No case for review is made out. Order has been passed in just and proper manner. The Review petition is dismissed. (BHAGWATI PRASAD)J.” In view of the fact that the review petition of the State Government on the same count has already been dismissed, I do not consider it appropriate to take any different view. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/