1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 180/2008 (Arjun Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 28/04/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. M.K.Garg for the petitioner. Mr. S.K.Vyas, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers as also statements of the witnesses so far recorded more particularly the statement of injured PW-8 Gopalram as also the Doctor who medically examined him and prepared the injury report PW-2 Dr. M.L.Meena. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the injured has exaggerated the case assigning various injuries to various persons. Except the injury No.1, other injuries are on non-vital parts and the petitioner is in custody for more than six months. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Arjun Ram S/o Chuna Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 53/2007 P.S. Deshnok, district Bikaner, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with 2 two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP