THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 9347 of 2004. DATED: 27-11-2006 Between: M/s Saleem Metal Industries, represented by Sri Mohd. Haroon Ansari. …Petitioner and The Commissioner for Workmens Compensation Authority And Assistant Commissioner of Labour Cirle-I Ranga Reddy District and another. …Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 9347 of 2004. Oral order: This writ petition is misconceived. It seeks a writ of Prohibition against the order of the 1st respondent dated 16-4-2004 in W.C.No.41 of 2000 whereby the 1st respondent- a quasi- judicial authority and the Commissioner of Workmens Compensation directed the writ petitioner to deposit the specified amount with the specified quantum of interest. As against this order, the petitioner has also subsequently filed C.M.A.No. 3694 of 2004 under Section 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1981 (for short ‘the Act’). As the petitioner has availed the appellate remedy, this writ petition need not be adjudicated. Even otherwise, no writ of Prohibition lies after an order is passed by the quasi-judicial authority and no certiorari would be maintainable in the context of an available alternative remedy which has already been availed of. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 27th November, 2006 GRR