**1** IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.340 of 2010 Deity Shri Dwarkadhees Maharaj VERSUS Girraj son of Shri Karan Singh Jat & Others Date of Judgment :::: 11th January, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. J.P. Goyal, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner-plaintiff against the order dated 01.10.2009, whereby the learned Appellate Court has allowed the application under Order 41 Rule 27, C.P.C. filed by the defendants for taking certain revenue documents on record. The learned Court below has come to the conclusion that the documents are relevant and necessary for the purposes of the determination of the real issue and further that the documents being revenue record and public documents and more than 75-years old, no exception can be taken to the same. **2** Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that in case the learned Appellate Court wanted to allow the application an opportunity ought to have been afforded to the plaintiff-petitioner for leading evidence inrebuttal, so far as the additional evidence being allowed in appeal is concerned. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the impugned order, I am of the view that the impugned order does not call for any interference in the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. However, so far as the plea of the petitioner-plaintiff for being permitted to lead rebuttal evidence against the additional evidence allowed by the learned Appellate Court is concerned, it will be open for the plaintiff-petitioner to move an application, along with the documents on which the plaintiff seeks to rely upon before the learned Appellate Court and the learned Appellate Court would decide the said application in accordance with law. Subject to the above, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/