IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18368 of 2008 NAVIN SINGH @ NAVEEN KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.7.2008 Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the informant. Let it be kept on the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner was earlier denied bail. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that almost all the witnesses have been examined except the Investigating Officer of the case. There is least possibility of tampering of any evidence in this case. Of course, the petitioner was instrumental in extending the period of trial. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-FTC No.4, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sessions Trial No.176/2007, with a direction that the petitioner shall attend each and every date of his trial in person and he will not be instrumental in extending the date of trial and no adjournment, specially in respect of cross- examination of the witnesses shall be granted.. SKBOSE (Subash Chandra Jha)