IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.273 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.355 OF 2010 Mr. Shivshankar R. Yadav ...Appellant. v. The M.C.G.M. ...Respondents. Mr.D.J.Lulia, adv. For the Appellant. Smt.K.K.Soran, adv. For the Respondent/BMC. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : MARCH 23, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 The trial Court refused ad-interim relief pending the notice of motion. Taking into consideration the controversy, in my considered opinion, following order will meet the ends of justice: i Respondent shall file reply to the notice of motion within two weeks from this date and the trial Court shall hear the parties and dispose off the notice of motion within three weeks thereafter. Pending the notice of motion, the structure as shown in the commissioner's report shall not be demolished without following the due process of law. However, it will not come in a way of the Municipal Corporation if it wants to issue notice for demolition and proceed as per law. - 2 - 3 Appeal stands disposed off accordingly. 4 As the appeal itself is disposed off, civil application no. 355/10 does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)