IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 356 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------- NIRMALA P KUMARAN, WD/O LATE PA KUMARAN, KADAMBARI Versus ONGC LTD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR CHETAN K PANDYA for Petitioner No. 1 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR RAJNI H MEHTA for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 11/07/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr.Mehta waives service of rule. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing today. Mr.Mehta produced on record copies of the letter written to the petitioner's Advocate Mr.C.K. Pandya, dated 6th June, 2001, as well as letter dated July 4, 2001, with Annexures, which are taken on record. Mr.C.K. Pandya confirms that he has received cheque No.49963 dated 5.6.2001, drawn on the Union Bank of India at Cochin - 682 035 of LIC of India for Rs.1,08,514/-, in the name of the petitioner being in full and final settlement of her claim in this petition against these respondents. A copy of the letter, along with a xerox copy of the cheque, is also taken on record. Mr.Pandya states that his client will send the discharge receipt to LIC of India, and a copy of the same will be went to PRBS, ONGC, Tel Bhavan, Dehra Dun - 248 001, during this month. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to make representation to LIC, Cochin, for interest on the aforesaid late payment of Rs.1,08,514/which was lying with LIC. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No costs. 11th July, 2001 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) *** (apj)