IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1390 of 2011 BAL MUKUND RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 28.02.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case instituted in 2002 in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 384, 406, 420, 342/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that some investments were made in a company in which petitioner was the Manager. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that part of the payment was made to the complainant and petitioner is ready to make the rest of the payment on settlement of the account. It is further submitted that other similarly situated accused person has been granted anticipatory bail vide A.B.P. No. 37 of 2009. Let learned Court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner considering the fact that other similarly situated accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Court below and after taking undertaking from the petitioner that he will make payment of the rest of the amount and also considering the age of the petitoner, preferably on the same day, if petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)