IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 29092 of 2008 Between: R.Lalith Mohan ..... PETITIONER AND Government of A.P. rep. By its Principal Secretary and two others .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.SRI HARSHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.NO.29092 of 2008 ORDER This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged action of the respondents in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of plot bearing No.48 situated in Sy.No.74/3 admeasuring 25 square yards forming part of M/s.Ravi Co-operative Housing Society Limited, East Maredpally, Secunderabad and interfering with the construction activities in the plot. When the matter is taken up for consideration it is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in identical circumstances W.P.No.9037 of 2007 was filed by one of the purchasers from M/s.Ravi Co-operative Housing Society Limited and this court after hearing both the parties by an order dated.05-06-2007 disposed of the said writ petition directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner therein. It was also observed as under:- “it shall however be open to MRO to implead the petitioner herein if not already impleaded in the pending L.G.C and seek appropriate orders from the special Court. This Court further requests Special Court constituted under Andhra Pradesh Grabbing(Prohibition) Act,1982, to dispose of LGC No.167 of 1997 expeditiously whether or not the petitioner is impleaded by the revenue officials. The writ petition with the above observations is accordingly disposed of. No costs.” The learned Government Pleader for Revenue who accepted notice for the respondents has not disputed the fact that the petitioner herein is also similarly situated. Accordingly, following the order in W.P.No.9037 of 2007 this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order extracted above. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J 31ST December,2008 *TSNR