Crl.M.No.M-25778 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-25778 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 7, 2010 Davinder Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Bhupinder Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.45969 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-25778 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.140, dated 5.7.2009, under Sections 307, 186, 353, 34, 332, 279, 427 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Petitioner was on bail and facing trial. He absented from the Court on 4.6.2010, when the case was fixed for evidence of the prosecution. Though an application for his personal exemption was moved, however, the same was not accepted as only one OPD slip was produced and learned trial Court came to the conclusion that the same was a procured one, as even the ailment allegedly suffered by the petitioner was not clear. Hence, his bail bonds were cancelled and to secure his presence non-bailable warrants were issued. However, the petitioner did not appear before learned trial Court. Earlier as well, he had filed application bearing Crl.M.No.M- 18520 of 2010 for grant of anticipatory bail before this Court, however, the Crl.M.No.M-25778 of 2010 (O&M) -2- same was dismissed on merit by this Court vide order dated 2.7.2010. However, petitioner was directed to appear before learned trial Court within two weeks from the date of that order. It was also directed that in case he appears before learned trial Court and applies for regular bail, the same be decided on merit on the same day after giving notice to the State. Despite that he did not appear before learned trial Court and filed another petitioner before this Court for anticipatory bail. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Davinder Singh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 7.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge