r- Kngl^BeneU c/^^y. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR fC.6.) WRIT P^TITION fS) N0. -46 3R OF 2006 PETmONER .^fe5y>. !•< C^A>-'"'1 .-•• ^•^ ?^ ..-•"" ,c>^0>^-^ ,<-l->- <r..--" ^s^^--' ^<t°'''\ ..•••'" ^ &® RESPONDENTS ..^^0^ 1 <%^!.^'»* to* Smt. Jamita, Wife of Shri Fakhruddin, aged about ^ years, Resident of RajakachharBEiia, Vitlage Tanchayat Navaparakala, Block Premnagar, Dtstrirt Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. , State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Women and Cftitd Development, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. . The Commissioner, Women and Child Development. (C.G.). 3. ' The Collector, Ambikapur, Distrtct Surguja (C.G.). 4. > Tfte Programme/Project Officer, . Women and Child Development (Project), Premnagar, District Surguja (C.G.). 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Premnagar, Dlstrict Surguja (C.G.). 6. t Smt. Urmila Wife of Shri Sukhnandan, Resident of Lalmatiyapara, Village Panchayat Navaparakala, Btock 'remnagar, District Surguja (C.G.). r W^^S^^-'^ WRFT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRFT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECnONS. vs Sff^ Vi R-<l=h ^^ •<ii'4i<?i<i, ynlyKo, fqdi^y '-\ Sll^I'q'R? ('^^fy^tt) Wiiw^toan^t S.B: Hon'ble Justice Mr. Pritiriker Diwaker i-07-3 IVIr. P.P. Sahu, counsel fofthe petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Sinah Thartur, Deputy Advocate General for iiic oiaie/resporiucuis IMO; i io entedain iih Challenge in the present 11.5.2006 and 11.8.2006 (Ann^ No. 4 whereby certain ap Aaaanwadi Karvakarta- This Court, while petitioner had aranted stav 3-8.2006. Counsel for the State poi| aiternative remedy of filing the Aaganwadi Appointment Schem| in view of the above seeks Dermission to withdraw file appeal before the Collector. filed the writ petition before thisl barred; therefore the Authority point of limitation liberaily. Accordinaly, the writ with aforesaid iibertv. 'h'rit oetition is to the orders dated jxure-P-6) passed by respondent apoointrtients were made on the post of cpl<lf^l^'i ^IMt^ ^f f%^ <P»I^R ,E^".,< aining the arievance of the her favour vide order dated hts out that the oetitioner has an ]appeal under Ctause 11 B of the ta stat^ment, counsei for the petitioner t|ie present petition with liberty to (-le further submits that as he has Court; his appeal wouid be time Inav be directed toconsider the oetltion is dismissed as withdrawn u. t' .-y^^'^*... t-'f JS' ~-,. 'CSi. ^' ^s. • '°' %. 3 % 1 ^"«SS^^ j vwy; s-0*:sc-78 sn^i v\ R-ii* 'tT^T 3TI^?T"9RW ^ .' ("' ^:^-LII'iil<ri'!-l, ®ill'y<t<o,[sK'll'Hy «n*i<fli shiich "^200 sn^iTT^? ('yi'l'i'C?) TOnw^fro 3i)^i -2-- tlte It is directed that if the| decided bv the Collector within receipt of the same lanorina As this Court has arantj 30.8.2006, the interim prote<ttion petitioner till the decision of th|s With the above of. obsentet appeai is filed, the same would be three months from the date of point of limitation. id stay in favour of the petitioner on will continue in favour of the b appeai. ^tion, the petition stands disposed wpifcrit^ 'qmsff ii fest <fatsi< ^STfOT 311^1 Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge ^.