SINGLE BENCH ® Q C4¢Im¢ IN THE HCN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(5)No. B52é /2o11 PeTiTioner‘ <, Kapoor' Singh Parihar‘, Aged abou‘r 56 years, S/o Lafe shri P.R.Singh, Sub Divisional Officer of Police, Bha‘l’apar‘a, Dish‘. Raipur—(C.G.) Versus Sfm‘e of ChhatfiSgar‘h, Through - The Principle Secrefar‘y (Home) Government 0f Chhaf’risgar'h, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur, Disf’r. Raipur—(C.G.) The Avar Secrefar'y (Home), Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur‘, Disff. Raipur—(C.G.) The Superim‘endenT of Police, Dis‘r’r. Raipur-(C.6.) Rujesh Khare Sub Divisional Officer of Police, Nagari Sihawa, DisTf. Dhamfari—(C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Respondems W HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.3526 OF 2011 (Writ Petition underArticIe 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri A.S. Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER (Passed on this 9th day of September, 201 1) Heard Iearnedcounsei for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that under the transfer policy of the Police Department dated 01.04.2006 (Annexure P/5), it is provided that the Sub-Inspectors and Inspectors, if have completed 54 years of their age, they should not be posted in Naxal affected areas and they should be posted in other area. Shri Rajput further submits that the petitioner has completed 56 years of age and, as such, he may not be posted in a Naxal affected area. It is next contended that the representation dated 15.06.2011 (Annexure P/4) of the petitioner has also not been decided till date. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State submits that if the representation of the petitioner, as aforestated, has not been decided till date, the same shall be considered and decided, as expeditiously as possible. It appears that the authorities have completely ignored the above-stated policy while passing the impugned transfer order dated 13.06.2011 In the said circumstances, the authorities are directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the light of the above stated policy and pass appropriate order on his representation dated 15.06.2011 (Annexure P/4), within a period of two weeks. It is further directed that till the representation is decided, the impugned order dated 13.06.2011, in respect of the petitioner, shall not be given effect to. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sdl- PETITIONER Kapoor Singh Parihar Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others