IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4345 of 2010 Date of Decision : 16.7.2010 Ramesh Chand ....Petitioner Versus Banwari Lal and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The present revision petition is directed against the order dated 7.8.2009 vide which the evidence of the petitioner was directed to be closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner is granted one opportunity to lead his entire evidence. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is totally misconceived. The petitioner was given several opportunities to lead his entire evidence and the impugned order was passed on 7.8.2009, whereafter the defendants had concluded their evidence. In these circumstances when the present petition has been filed after a delay of about one year, the petitioner does not deserve C.R.No.4345 of 2010 -2- any indulgence from this Court. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 16.7.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss