IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.592 of 2010 SURESH RAM, S/o Gulab Ram, R/o Vill. & P.S. Brahmpur, District-Buxar. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 28.04.2010 Heard both the parties. This revision application is filed against the Judgment and order dated 28.01.2010 passed by the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C. 2, Buxar in Cr. Appeal No. 38 of 2007. Sentence is only pressed referring that the parties are next door neighbour having differences at different points which may not be expressed but allegation is about petitioner entering into the informant’s room after scaling the roof by means of stair caught her hand and on objection, he came back and abuse her also. Though it is believed by passing concurrent finding but unbelievable circumstance entitles the petitioner for relief on the point of sentence. He should be released after admonition on execution of probation bond even then he remained in custody since 19.04.2010 which can be minimized to the period undergone. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence which is modified and minimized to the period undergone and the above named petitioner is directed to be released forthwith subject to deposit of fine in the Court below, if not wanted in any other case. Rest of the judgment and order dated 28.01.2010 passed 2 by the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-2, Buxar in Cr. Appeal No. 38 of 2007 and the Judgment and order dted 04.07.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Buxar passed in G.R. No. 1405 of 2004/Tr. No. 912 of 2007 are hereby affirmed. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)