1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1261 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2375 OF 2000 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Vijay Patil , Advocate, for the applicants. Ms Nikita Trivedi i/b YKS Legal for Original Petitioner. Shri P.P.Chavan, for respondent no.5. Shri S.K.Chinchalikar, AGP, for respodnent nos 3 to 6. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 14/08/2009 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this civil application, the applicants have made the following prayer: “(a) It be declared that the order of status quo dated 26.7.2000 in main Writ Petition does not apply to the plots Nos 47, 17, and 46, CTS No.495, Sadar Bazar, Satara, belonging to the petitioner nos 1,2 and 3 respectively and the Collector of Satara, respondent no.3 herein, be T 2 directed to issue necessary directions to correct the City Survey record and delete the entry made in the City Survey Record on 21.11.2003.” The applicants were not parties to Writ Petition No.2375 of 2000. In the writ petition in paragraph 20, the petitioners have made a statement that out of 52 plots, 36 plots have already been sold to different persons and they have made constructions on most of the plots. The applicants are also amongst those 36 plot owners. This Court, while admitting the writ petition, directed the parties to the writ petition to maintain status-quo as on the date of the order as regards their respective possession of the property in question. Admittedly, the applicants were not parties to the petition. In view thereof, it is made clear that the order of status-quo does not bind the applicants. With these observations, the civil application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3