IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 11073 of 2005 Between: 1 Vatsavayi Sitamma W/o Late Vatsavayi Subbaraju r/o Chinamallam Village, Penugonda Mandla, West Godavari District 2 Smt. P. Suryakantham W/o P. Sivaramakrishnam Raju r/o Chinamallam Village, Penugonda Mandla, West Godavari District 3 Smt. Bh. Renuka Devi W/o Narayana Raju r/o Chinamallam Village, Penugonda Mandla, West Godavari District 4 Smt. T. Jenny W/o Balachanddra r/o Chinamallam Village, Penugonda Mandla, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of A.P., rep by Principal Secrtary, Revenue (Endowments) Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner, Endowments Departmetn, Government of A.P., Hyderabad 3 The Executive Officer, Sri Kesava Swamy Devasthanam Chinnamallam (V), Penugonda Mandal, West godavari District 4 The Asst commissioner of Endowments, Eluru, W.G.Dist. R-4 is impleaded as per court order dated 04/01/06 in wpmp 217/2006. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondnet No.3 in issuing Notice NO. 13, dt `7-3-2005 in Form No.I under Rule 5 (1) of G.O.Ms. No. 379 Revenue (Endowments IV) Departmetn, dt 24-5-2003 by invoking the provisions of Section 83 of the Act 30/1987 as unconstitutional, ultra vires the section 83 of the Act 30/1987 and set a side the same and declare that the proposed action of the respondents to evict the petitioenrs from the land to an extent of 7-46 cents inSy. No. 167/1 of Chinamallam (V), penugonda Mandal West Godavari District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of India and for a consequential order directing the respondnets notto evict the petitioenrs herein from the abovesaid lands and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstnaces of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned Counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dt. 30.4.2009 seeking to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the letter, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 11073 of 2008 Dated: 1.5.2009.