IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38780 of 2010 1. GOPAL SINGH 2. SUDAMA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 29.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Lawyer for informant is also present. After negotiation between complainant and these petitioners, petitioners’ company Jyanti Agro Fruits Private Limited agreed to appoint the complainant as stockiest of Koshi range for which Rs. six lacs in two instalments was paid. Later on complainant was made no- stockiest, but admittedly is returned half of the amount and for half; three cheques issued, but are bounced. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that any amount received by them is deposited to company’s account for which only company had to make payment and three cheques for three lacs are issued, but petitioners are not issuer of cheques and now have left the company also. So fixing liability against them rejection of their prayer of anticipatory bail is not justified. I agree with the learned counsel for the 2 petitioners. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No.22/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)