IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 01-07-2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.9439 of 2007 O.A.No.728 of 2001 G.Balasubramanian ..Petitioner Versus 1.Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Chennai -9. 2.Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 3.Commissioner, Chidambaram Municipality, Chidambaram. ..Respondents Prayer: Original application No.728 of 2001 filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal,on abolition, transferred to the file of the Court and renumbered as W.P.No.9439 of 2007 seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to disburse the following pensionary Benefits admissible to the Applicant i.e. 1. Provisional Pension amounting to 90% of the pension of the Applicant. (2). General Provident Fund and (3). Special provident fund. For Petitioner : Mr.S. Ilamvaludhi For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Government Advocate O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to disburse the following pensionary Benefits admissible to the petitioner i.e. 1. Provisional https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Pension amounting to 90% of the pension of the petitioner. (2). General Provident Fund and (3). Special provident fund. 3. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition and the second respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition , within a period of fifteen days from today and on receipt of such representation, the second respondent is directed to consider the claims of the petitioner and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Chennai -9. 2. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 3. The Commissioner, Chidambaram Municipality, Chidambaram. + 1 c.c. to Mrs. S. Anitha, Advocate. S.R.No.28086. + 1 c.c. to The Government Pleader. S.R.No.28007. Writ Petition No.9439 of 2007 SGL (CO) GSK 03.07.2009. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/