IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4976 of 2010 Between: Sakhamuri Prasada Babu … Petitioner And Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.V.L.N. Sarma Counsel for respondents 1-5: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4976 of 2010 ORDER:- The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that despite complaints made by him against respondent No.6, respondent Nos.4 and 5 have not been taking any action. Though this case was adjourned on 04.02.2010 to enable the official respondents to instruct the Government Pleader, at the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home reported no instructions. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner has been making complaints against respondent No.6 for allegedly entering into the area in which he is authorized to carry on cable network business apart from destroying the cable wires, amplifier boxes and fibre optical material belonging to him. The petitioner’s grievance is that despite the said complaints, none of the official respondents have taken any action. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.4 and 5 to examine the complaints of the petitioner and take action according to law, if they are satisfied that the complaints disclose commission of offence by respondent No.6. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.6410 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 23.03.2010 ES Note:- Issue C.C. in one week. ES