IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 5516 of 2011 Date of decision : 28.03.2011 Shri Chand Vats ...Petitioner versus State Information Commissioner, Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, the State Information Commission (for brevity “the SIC”) has directed the respondent to supply the information at point No.2, mentioned in application (Annexure P-1), vide order dated 19.11.2010 (Annexure P-9) but the same has neither been supplied nor the complaint/representation (Annexure P-11) filed by the petitioner was decided by the SIC. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the record, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1 to decide the complaint/representation (Annexure P-11) within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. March 28, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge