IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25289 of 2011 Kshatri Yadav, son of Late Ramotar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that facts of the fact reveals that there was land dispute between the parties who are agnates and in the heat of passion the petitioner is said to have assaulted the deceased on the head on account of which he died. Further submission is that now the charge has been framed. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C.-4, Khagaria, in connection with Sessions Case No. 174 of 2011 arising out of Khagaria Mufassil P.S. Case No. 462 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and 2 the other shall be the brother-in-law of the petitioner namely Gaurav Kumar. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)