IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Misc. Application No. 1051 of 2011 In Criminal Misc. Application No. 1008 of 2009 Chand Mahrotra. ………. Applicant. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. ..…. Respondents Present : Mr. Raj Kumar Verma, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for the respondent no. 2. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Sri Chand Mahrotra applicant is present in person along with his counsel Sri R.K. Verma while Sri J.S. Virk, learned counsel is present on behalf of respondent no. 2. Heard upon Misc. Application No. 1051 of 2011, which has been supported with the affidavit of Sri Chand Mahrotra. It has been stated in the affidavit that both the parties have entered into a compromise and the certified copy of the compromise has been annexed with the affidavit. Paragraph 6 of this compromise states the term that chargesheet no. 93A / 2008 pertaining to crime no. 108 of 2008 under section 498A IPC read with section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, shall be dropped and connecting to that petition no. 1008 of 2009 pending before this court should be allowed. So as per the terms of the deed of compromise, this petition is allowed, with the result chargesheet no. 93A of 2008 pertaining to criminal complaint case no. 228 of 2009 (State Vs. 2 Chand Mahrotra) and order of cognizance dated 20.05.2009 passed therein, by the Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI, Dehradun are hereby quashed. Misc. Application No. 1051 of 2011 is also disposed of. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 09.09.2011 SKS