IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6663 of 2007 Shyamawati Karan, wife of Late Bishwanath Prasad, resident of North Patel Nagar ,End of Sahdeo Path, Guru Sahay Lane Nagar, P.O. Keshri Nagar, Police Station-Patliputra, District-Patna ---------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Vice-Chancellor, Patna University, Patna 2. The Registrar, Patna University, Patna 3. The Development Officer, Patna University,Patna 4. The Principal, Magadh Mahila College, Patna 5. The State of Bihar, through its Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna ----------------- Respondents. ----------- 04 17-05-2011 Heard Sri Dinbandhu Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.1 to 4/ Patna University, Patna and Smt. Parnita, learned A.C. to Government Pleader no.7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. However, some grievances are required to be redressed by the Respondent authority, for which it was submitted that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the competent authority. The prayer of the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for the remaining grievances has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the Respondents. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach Respondent no.2/ Registrar, Patna University, 2 Patna for redressal of the remaining grievances by filing a proper representation within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.2 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, Respondent no.2 is required to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time. It goes without saying that if Respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid time. The writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )