IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1187 (M/S) of 2008 Tek Chand .……… Petitioner Versus Swami Sarveshwar Muni, Trustee and President Shri Swami Bhumanand Trust (Udasin Ashram) Gopal Mandir Compound, Uttarkashi ……… Respondent Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. JUDGMENT Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Vide order dated 5.5.2007, the learned trial court rejected the petitioner’s application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. The revision filed against this order met with the same fate because the learned revisional court vide order dated 25.4.2008 dismissed the revision petition. It is against the aforesaid order that the present petition under Article 227 has been filed by the petitioner in this Court. The learned Courts below have rightly rejected the petitioner’s application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. because the application was misconceived as well as it was frivolous and non-maintainable. A bare look at the plaint does convince me that no part of Rule 11 of Order 7 C.P.C. was attracted in this case because the plaint did not at all deserve to be rejected in terms of this provision of law. Since the plaint did disclose a cause of action, 2 it was also properly valued as well as no part of the plaint suggested that the suit was barred by any law. Petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 29.7.2008 Avneet