IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32953 of 2009 MATAR MIYAN s/o Md. Hasim Miyan resident of village- Ghorahat, P. S. Manjhi Distt- Saran at Chapra. … Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Considering that the recovery from the house of the petitioner is not only of firearm but a large number of other materials to show that person in possession of such materials was also manufacturing illegal arms, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner even when he would take a plea that the house in question does not belong to him exclusively or that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There being recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner and that too in a steel trunk (big box) inside the house of the petitioner, it would be difficult to accept even the story of plantation. The petitioner claims to be in custody since 20.5.2009 though the court below records the date of custody since 25.5.2009. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completing one year of his further judicial custody. 2 At the same time, as the petitioner is already in custody and charge-sheet has already been submitted, this Court would direct the court below to take up the trial of the petitioner keeping in view that the petitioner is sole accused and the witnesses also are official witnesses and therefore the trial of the petitioner may be concluded within the aforementioned period of one year. If the trial is not concluded in the aforementioned period of one year, the petitioner shall have liberty to initially move before the trial court for grant of bail and the trial court will have to spell out reasons for not concluding the trial. Only thereafter, the petitioner may approach this court for bail. With the aforementioned observations, this application is dismissed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)