^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF .TUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition No. f'2,3 ? /2006 BS!IS Petitioner: A-;^ ^^•""..-- ^^•^•^,---" •••".•S^X'"' :sP"'-.\'<A'\o;-"' ^f-f" R6§pondents : ^'^ 1. ^ ^ <* .-4<^-^ ^ -^ \y ^ ^^ 2. ^ 3. / Ku. Rashmi Parganiha D/o Late Shri Vinod Kumar Aged about 20 Years, R/o Vill.- Taralim, Tahsil & Thana- Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, through it's Secretary Department of. School Education D.K.S. Building Raipur (C.G.) The State of Madhya Pradesh through it's Secretary Department of School Education Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal (M.P.) Block Education Officer, Teh. Berla Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Bematara , ^ Distt. Durg (C.G.) .-s's / 5. Union of India, through The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension Third floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICAL 226/227 OF THE CQNSTDMaONJ3F INDIA. b Jfi Xf-HC-22 -3S[ ^tCTRTO, ^•^y1!®,'f^RTOy STI^I'ERI K;-ti<* anN .•g?t[W(riN •^j.1 » H/- 'WWn'chHlsh 1q^? < ., ;^f w^^ ^.,...............................,...^ sn^r wiTwgfsd -aa^seee—- Shri Sameer Behar, obuns^l for the petitioner. qiplRTif^T WRif fl feT3T <f»lt<l< iTSlpOTsn^i . . Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. A|' theState of Ghhattisgam. Shri S.K. Beriwal, Sr. Panell Heard. , I Learned counsel forthe p^l was wirking as Assistant Teach^i thereafter the petitioner appliea for] it is further submitted that in batcrt G. & Shri Satish Gupta, Dy'; Govt. Advocate for Lawyer, for Union of inciia. :ttioner submits that the petitioner's father, who •, died during service period on 4/8GOOO and compassionate appointment whioh was.denied. of cases bearing W.P. No,1322SOQ2 involving that the State of Chhattisgarh h^ dependants of those employees accordance with the policy prevalen) in view of the submissions parties, without expressing any opif this 'Court, ends ofjusticewili be the same qitestion orders have beejn passed by this Court on 20-12-2005. Heprays that similar orders may be passed i^i this case also. Leamed counsel for the St^te does not dispute the abbve fact arid states 1^8 taken a decision to consider the cases of I'who dled on &r after 1-11-1997strictly ih atthattime. — / made by learned eounsel appearing for the iijiionon the merits ofthe case, in the opinion of |served if a direction,is given to the State of Chhattisgarh andthe authoritles cojicerned to considef and decide the caseofthe petitioner in accordance with the po| father If the petitionerfoynd eligibi^ possibie preferably within a period of ofcopyofthisorder.TheRetitioner ij authorities. ^ With the aforesaid observatio^iSi this petition stands disposed of. Certified copyas per ruies. Copy to the State counsel. cy prevalent at ihe time of death ofpetitioner's appointmert ordere wili be issued as early as four months from the date ef receipuproduction . also directed to render due co-operation to the Sd/- I;akbruddin Judge [T^^f^