COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONTEI^PT CASE (CiViU N0.88 of 2009 PETiTIONER RES.PONDENT Lakhanlai, S/o Mohan Lal Jha, Aged about 64 years, R/o Viilage Arjuni, Tahsll Dongargarh, Dlstrict Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versiss Vivek Dhand, Principa! Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) in CONTEEVIPT PETSTION UNDER ARTICLE 218 OF THE CONSTITUTSON OF iNDIA Appearancej. Shri Anup Majumdar, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Dy. Advocate General fortherespondent. ORAL ORDER (18.01.2010) SUNEL KUIVIAR SINHA^. Heard. Petitioner-Lakhanlai has fiied this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondent for wlljfui disobedience of the order dated 13 of March 2008 passed in W.P.(S)No.6059of2006. This Court while disposing of the aforesaid writ petition passed the following order: "3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks iiberty of this Court to make a detaiSed representation for consideration of his case in the iight of judgment and order dated 28.08.06 passed in W.P. No.4135/04 (M.A. Hakim Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Supra). 4. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State submits that, in the event, the petltioner make a representation, the same -i ^y^ CONTENPTCASE (CIVIU N0.88 of 2009 shall be considered in accordance with iaw expeditiously. 5. In view of the foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of wlth the above stated liberty. No order as to cost." Repiy on behaifofthe respondent has been filed. The respondent has contended that the representation filed by the petitioner has t>een decided vide order dated 26.03.2009 (Annexure R/2). Since the representation filed by the petitioner has already been decided, 1 am not inciined to proceed further in this matter for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondent. In view ofthe above, the contempt petition is liabie to be djsmissed and is hereby djsmissed. i Sd/- SunilKumar Sinha Judge shyna