1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. SUMMARY SUIT NO.3003 OF 2007 State Bank of India. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Ranjit Machindra Chavan & Anr. ...Defendants. .... Mr. Prasad Das i/b. M/s. Goenka Law Asso. for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 15, 2008. P.C.: The suit, under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been instituted for the recovery of monies due on account of a loan advanced in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- under a personal loan agreement dated 20th April 2005. The First Defendant is the principal borrower while the Second Defendant executed a Deed of Guarantee. The amount has remained due and outstanding despite a notice of demand. 2 The Defendants have failed to enter appearance despite service of the writ of Summons. The Plaintiff has placed on the record an affidavit of service and a compilation of the original documents. Since the Defendants have failed to enter appearance despite service, the Plaintiff is entitled to a decree under Order 37 Rule 2(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The suit shall stand decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules. .....