IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 20827 of 2010 Date of decision:3.12.2010 Harshdeep Singh Devgun @ Harry Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh,Sr.Advocate with Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate. Ms. Gagan Mohini, AAG, Pb Mr. SS Khaira, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case of murder of Charanjit Singh by his son Simratpal Singh. So far as petitioner is concerned, he has joined Simratpal Singh and facilitated the crime by holding the arm of Charanjit Singh. The other arm was held by Mandip Singh. Mandip Singh has been granted the concession of bail. Learned counsel for the complainant has contended that when Mandip Singh was granted bail, the relevant evidence was not brought to the notice of the court. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the material witnesses have already been examined and that the investigating officer is yet to be examined. For the purpose of bail, the case of the petitioner is at par with that of Mandip Singh. The petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond/ surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial court. December 3 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE