IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6488 of 2008 ANIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he fired at the informant which caused injury on non-vital part of the body of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that both parties are Gotias and there is a case and a counter case between them for the occurrence of the same date and in fact the prosecution party had gathered to snatch the rifle of the petitioner due to which the petitioner had to fire in his self defence which caused the said injuries. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 30.10.2007. On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that the petitioner and one Nagina Yadav fired at the informant and both the shot hit the informant. He further submits that the prosecution case of direct allegation against the petitioner is supported by several persons. - 2 - In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner, namely Anil Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Silao P.S.Case No.313 of 2007. sunil ( S.N.Hussain,J.)