IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2771 of 2010 1. Sanjay Kumar Thakur son of Ramdas Thakur, resident of mohalla- Nai Bazar, P.O. and P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra (Saran) 2. Sunil Kumar son of Shyam Narain Prasad, resident of mohalla- Chhota Telpa, P.O. and P.S.- Chapra Town, District Chapra (Saran) 3. Surendra Kumar son of Ram Ashish Prasad, resident of mohalla Chhota Brahmpur, P.O. and P.S. – Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra (Saran) 4. Narendra Kumar son of Jai Nath Rai, resident of Mohalla- Chhatradhari Bazar, , P.O. and P.S. – Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra (Saran) 5. Jitendra Kumar Singh son of Indradeo Singh, resident of mohalla- Rauja, , P.O. and P.S. – Chapra Town, District Chapra (Saran) 6. Dharmendra Kumar son of Jai Nath Rai, resident of mohalla Chhatradhari Bazar, , P.O. and P.S. – Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra (Saran) 7. Manoj Kumar son of Mohan Prasad, resident of mohalla Mauna Mohar Nagar, , P.O. and P.S. – Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra (Saran) 8. Arun Kumar son of Raghu Nath Singh, resident of mohalla Ratanpura Garha, , P.O. and P.S. – Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra (Saran) Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Shri Girish Shankar 2. Divisional Commissioner, Saran at Chapra namely Smt. Anchal Arya 3. District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra namely Shri Pankaj Kumar Pal 4. Deputy Development Commissioner, Saran at Chapra namely Shri Sushil Kumar 5. Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Chapra namely Shri Santosh Kumar 6. Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Chapra namely Smt. Shobha Devi ----------- 05/ 16.05.2011 By filing show cause, opposite party nos. 5 and 6 have informed this Court 2 that in compliance of the enquiry report of the Deputy Development Commissioner, Saran at Chapra, bearing Memo No. 160 dated 29.4.2011 and 161 dated 29.4.2011, the contempt petitioners have been informed under Memo No. 276 dated 9.5.2011 and other letters, copy whereof shall be furnished to the counsel for the petitioners by tomorrow, that their engagement in the Nagar Parishad, Chapra was illegal and violative of the Government circulars. In view of the contents of letter no. 276 dated 9.5.2011, Annexure-B to the show cause and other similar letters, copy whereof shall be furnished to the counsel for the petitioner by tomorrow and the enquiry report dated 29.4.2011, I am satisfied that the orders of the High Court dated 16.2.2010, Annexure-1 has been complied with and the contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of granting the petitioners liberty to challenge order bearing 3 Letter No. 276 dated 9.5.2011, Annexure-B to the show cause and other similar letters together with the report dated 29.4.2011. Arjun/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)