1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 540 OF 2009 Tata Capital Ltd. .... Petitioner vs Anand S. Oberoi .... Respondent Mr.Nikhil Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture for the petitioner. Respondent present in person. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 2nd September, 2009 P.C.: 1 The parties have settled the matter and accordingly re-scheduled the instalment of the loan and accordingly entered into fresh contracts. Therefore, the parties have filed the consent term dated 02.09.20098, taken on record and marked “X”. The respondent is present in Court. The consent term is signed by the respondent and the Advocate for the petitioner. There is no dispute about the signature as well as authorisation. 2 In view of this, the petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms dated 02.09.2009. No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)