IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 616 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25/04/2008 in WP NO : 9263 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sri Kakarlapudi Radha, W/o. late Venkata Ramabadra Raju, R/o. Satyavaram Village, Payakaraopet Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Tahsildar, Payakarao pet Mandal,Payakaraopet, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam Division,Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.V.V.N.NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Heard the learned Advocates. The petition itself has been filed at the stage when an enquiry is pending to find out whether the appellant is an encroacher. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that till now no final decision has been taken by the authority and, therefore, in our opinion, the petition is premature and the learned Single Judge is right in dismissing the petition. The appeal stands disposed of as premature with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 27th June, 2008. _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR