IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2010 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 1605 of 2010() ------------------------- C.C.NO.1057/2009 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,CHALAKKUDY PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ---------------------- ANNIE THOMAS, W/O. THOMAS P.A., PLAKKAL HOUSE, MALA - PALLIPURAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT & STATE ---------------------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI B.JAYASURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== CRL. M.C. No.1605 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 6th day of May, 2010 O R D E R This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a direction to the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chalakkudy to consider the bail application to be filed by the petitioner in connection with C.C. No.1057 of 2009 on the same day of its filing and to pass such other orders or reliefs as this Court deems it fit in the interest of justice. Petitioner is accused in C.C. No.1057 of 2009 of the trial court for offences punishable under Section 291 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 24(1) and 43 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution Act), 1974. According to the petitioner there was failure on her part to appear in the trial court for a day and consequent to that, a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued to her. 2. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. 3. Though as per the version of petitioner a Non-Bailable CRL. M.C. No.1605 of 2010 -: 2 :- Warrant was issued to her for her absence for a single day, I am unable to issue any such direction as prayed for in the light of decisions of this Court in Martin v. State of Kerala (2004 [2] KLT 1037) and Pappachan v. Muthu (2005 [2] KLT 76). Having regard to the circumstances stated before me I direct the learned Magistrate to dispose of the application for bail if any preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed with the above direction. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv