1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2062 OF 2005 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.393 OF 2005 Mr.Ketan Rukhana ... Petitioner. vs. 1. M/s.Manisha Enterprises & others. .... Respondents. --- Mr.Rajiv Narula i/b. M/s.J, Narula & Associates, for Petitioner. Mr.S.S.Purohit i/b. M/s.Mohit & Co. , for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 7th December, 2005 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for both the sides. Perused the affidavit filed in support of notice of motion. No reply has been filed by the respondents. In my opinion, following order would meet the ends of justice:- (1) The notice of motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). (2) The Petitioner is directed to pay as and by way of cost of 2 this notice of motion Rs.10,000/- to the respondents. Notice of motion is disposed of. ---