t^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) No. 2408 of2008 PETITIONER APPLIC^NT RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICA.NT Zila Sahkari Kendriya Banlc Maryadit Througli: The Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpur, Dist. Bastar (C.G.) ^7ERSUS : 1) The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarli, Raipur(C.G.) 2) The Joint Registrar, • Co-operative Societies, Raipur(C.G.) 3) The Deputy R^gistrar, Co-operative Societies, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar. 4) K-N.Mishra, S/o Late Shri R.N.Mishra, Ex- Lamps Manager, Bamkot Salsia, at Preseiit R/o Rajendra Nagar Wai'<i Jagdalpur; Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRTT PETITION U/A 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND1A SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocate for tlw pctitioaer. Shri Y.S.Thakw, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/ respondent No. 1 to 3, ORALORDER (Passed on 28m day of April,2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner-Bank submits that fhe respondent No. 4 was terminated from service after proper enquiry on 19.04.2005. The respondent No. 3, thereafter quashed the temiination order m an appeal flled by the respondent No. 4, oii 09.01.2007 (Aimexure P/l). Being aggyieved, the petitioner-Bank preferred aB appeal before the Joint Registrw, Cooperative Societies, alongwith an application for stay ofthe order dated 09.01.2007 passed by the Deputy Registrar. The Joint Registrar dismissed the applioation for stayiag the order dated 09.01.2007, on 16.05.2007 (Amiexure P/2). The petitioner, thereafler preferred a revision which was also dismissed cn 25.02.2008 ~^n (Amiexure P/3) on the ground of non-mamtamability. Thus, fliis petition. 2. Shri Bharat leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after dismissal ofthe application for stay, the Joint Registrar, reBpondent No. 2 is not deciding the appeal which w^ flled in the month of Febmary 2007. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 3. In normal course, this Court should siot entertam such petition seekmg a directionto the quasi-judicial authority for disposal of appeal. However, in the facts situation ofthecase- the petitioner is at Hberty to make an application before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, to coasider aiid decide the appeal expeditiously, 4. In view ofthe fbregoing obsen/ations, fhis petition stasida disposed o£ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^^c.