IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14503 of 2011 1. Prem Sagar Singh S/O Sri Vidyanand Prasad R/O Vill.-Khapura, P.S.- Kako, Distt.-Jehanabad. 2. Ajay Kumar Yadav S/O Jagarnath Yadav R/O Vill.-Pratap Sagar, P.S.- Dumraon, Distt.-Buxar. 3. Santosh Kumar Singh S/O Sri Ram Bihari Singh R/O Vill.-Mohali, P.S.-Arrah Muffasil, Distt.-Bhojpur. 4. Avinash S/O Sri Kamla Nayan Sharma R/O Vill.-Shivnar, P.S.- Mokama, Distt.-Patna. ---Petitioners. Versus 1. The Union of India Through Secretary, Deptt. Of Home, New Delhi. 2. Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi. 3. Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Sector, Patna. 4. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur. 5. Commandant, 11th Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Salgadih, Tamar, Jharkhand. ---Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 20.10.2011 Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. S.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent are present. No counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent has been filed. On 05.09.2011, this Court passed the following order:- “Both sides present. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present application be also disposed of in terms of order passed by a Bench of this Court in batch of writ petitions being CWJC No. 19731 of 2010 and analogous matters disposed of on 14.1.2011. It appears that the case of the petitioners stand not on same footings inasmuch as they had filed a representation before the authorities which was considered and disposed of by a well reasoned order which has been impugned in the present writ petition ( Annexure-7 series). Learned Assistant Solicitor General prays for and is granted five weeks to take instruction and file counter affidavit. Post this matter after six weeks as zero item.” It is submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied if they are 2 permitted to make a representation for consideration of their cases in the light of order passed by this Court in CWJC No. 19731 of 2010 and analogous matters/ cases. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent Union of India, in view of the said stand taken by the petitioners, does not object disposal of the case in the aforesaid terms. This Court, in the facts and circumstances of the case, permits the petitioners to file a representation within a period of 04 weeks along with a copy of the present order whereafter the respondent no.4 (DIG, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur) shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a reasonable time in any case within a period of 06 weeks of its filing/presentation. If the petitioners are able to make out a case based on the order passed in CWJC No. 19731 of 2010 and analogous matters/ cases, the authorities shall consider the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Let it be recorded that this Court has not gone into the merit of the case. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)