CW 8661/09 {1} In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench Judgment ** S.No. / Civil Writ Petition No. / Cause title 1. 8661/2009 Prakash C.Choudhary Versus RPSC 2. 8662/2009 Kishore Kr. Prajapt & Anr Versus RPSC 3. 8665/2009 Saroj Kumari Syoran & Anr Versus State & Ors. 4. 8666/2009 Enayat Khan Pathan & Anr Versus State & RPSC. 5. 8670/2009 Keshav Singh & Ors Versus State & RPSC 6. 8672/2009 Savitri Meena & Ors Versus State & Ors 7. 8673/2009 Dinesh Chand Sharma Versus State & RPSC 8. 8675/2009 Pinki Sharma Versus State & RPSC 9. 8678/2009 Ajay Kr. Garg Versus State & RPSC 10.8679/2009 Mahipal Singh Versus State & RPSC 11.8682/2009 Virendra Singh & Ors Versus State & RPSC 12.8685/2009 Radha Jat Versus RPSC 13.8686/2009 Meenakshi Verma Versus RPSC & Anr 14.8688/2009 Naresh Sharma Versus State & RPSC 15.8689/2009 Alpana Sharma & Ors Versus State & RPSC 16.8691/2009 Dallaram Garsia &Ors Versus State & Ors 17.8551/2009 Nandram Meena Versus State & RPSC Date of Order : 08/12/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Advocates for petitioners Sarva Shri SK Gupta, HR Kumawat, Anil Upman Anshuman Saxena, Neeraj Sharma, Chandra P.Sharma, Kamal Gupta, Pushpendra Psoingh, Rajesh Bhamboo, Rishi Kr. Sharma, TanveerAhmed, & Kaleem A.Khan Mr. SN Kumawat, for respondent-RPSC Mr. Ganesh Meena, Govt. Counsel for State All these petitions being based on common facts involving identical controversy raised at the bar are being decided together at joint request by present order. Being eligible for the posts of Teachers (Sanskrit)/General Teachers Gr.III advertised by Rajasthan Public Service CW 8661/09 {2} Commission Ajmer (“PSC”) vide notification No.1/Exam. ”Ga”/Adhyapak/Sanskrit Shiksha/2008-09/1125/dated 20/06/2008 petitioners submitted their applications for the post of Teachers (Sanskrit)/General Teachers Gr.III but their candidature was rejected only on the premises of either having filled up wrong post Code or failed to fill up post Code in OMR sheet being appended to the application form or having been made available to the applicants through downloading from internet website of respondent-PSC – by virtue whereof, they were not permitted to appear in Teacher (Sanskrit)/General Teachers Gr.III competitive examination, 2008 which was scheduled to be held on 22/07/09 as is evident from press notification dt.02/07/09. Under interim orders all of them were provisionally permitted to participate in process of selection and appear in aforesaid competitive examination, 2008 subject to production of proof regarding “Bar Code” and declaration of result of their participation was made subject to permission of this Court. However, pursuant to interim orders, Admit cards were issued to respective petitioners. Counsel submits that controversy raised herein has been decided by this Court CW 8661/09 {3} in CWP-8359/2009 & bunch of others (Naval Kishore Sharma Versus State & Ors.) on 30/11/09) holding ad infra: “In the light of what has been observed (supra), all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondent-PSC to declare result of participation of the writ petitioners who have appeared under interim orders of this Court, by wide publication & circulation including through internet website of respondent-PSC within fifteen days and if placed in the merit list, respondents are directed to consider them for appointment as per order of their respective merit prepared by respondent-PSC in pursuance of advertisement dt.20/06/08. No costs.” Consequently these petitions are also disposed of in terms of judgment dt.30/11/09 quoted supra. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p3/ 8661CW09(17)-Dec8BarCodeTchrSnsk.doc