1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 317 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No. 1606 of 2007 [pending] [The Divisional Controller, MSRTC Vs. Sk. Wakil son of Sk. Tannomiya] With Letters Patent Appeal No. 318 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No. 1558 of 2008 [pending] [The Divisional Controller, MSRTC Vs. Sk. Wakil son of Sk. Tannomiya] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Letters Patent Appeal No. 317/09 : Mr. V.G. Wankhede, Adv., for the Appellant. Mr. Mishra, Adv., for the respondent. ----- Letters Patent Appeal No. 318/09 : Mr. V.G. Wankhede, Adv., for the Appellant. Mr. Mishra, Adv., for the respondent. ----- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATE : 08th September, 2009. The question is whether appellant was given an opportunity to prove the misconduct by learned Labour Court. We have heard Adv. Mr. Wankhede for the 2 appellant and Adv. Mr. Mishra for respondent. The respondent was a driver and misconduct against him was in relation to an accident suffered by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation s passenger bus. The challenge that the opportunity was not given does not appear to have been raised before Revisional Court, i.e., Industrial Court. The learned Single Judge has, in this background, admitted Writ Petitions, but refused to grant interim relief. In these circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere in the Letters Patent Appeals. Letters Patent Appeals are dismissed. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3