drp {1} Cri. Application No.117/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.117 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.6 OF 2011 Raju Daulatrao Sale APPLICANT VERSUS Bharti Raju Sale RESPONDENT ....... Mr. S.S.Shinde, Advocate for the applicant ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 31st March 2011 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay of 34 days, caused in filing criminal revision application challenging judgment dated 10.08.2009 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court Aurangabad in MA. No.34/2009. 2. Though the respondent is duly served, yet she chose to remain absent. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay is condoned. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln117-11 drp {2} Cri. Application No.117/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.6 OF 2011 Raju Daulatrao Sale APPLICANT VERSUS Bharti Raju Sale RESPONDENT ....... Mr. S.S.Shinde, Advocate for the applicant ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 31st March 2011 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondent. Call for Record and Proceedings. List the revision for admission after receipt of the Record and Proceedings. Parties be put to notice that this revision is likely to be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln117-11