IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 6275 of 2006 1. Shaikh Miya Rashid and others ..Petitioners vs. 1. Public Works Department’ and another ...Respondent Shri Tushar Kale i/b Shri U.P.Warunjikar for petitioners. Shri A.H.Palekar, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 14th June, 2007 14th June, 2007 14th June, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Perused the interlocutory order which has been delivered during the course of hearing of the suit. There is no reason for interfering with the same at this stage. Needless to state that the instant order does not preclude the petitioners from challenging the impugned order and findings therein in case the final order in the suit is adverse to them. Needless to state that while the final order is under challenge all contentions including the one forming part of the present petition would be available for being urged. Petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)