IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1875 of 2009 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS PATNA REGIONAL OFFICE, WHICH IS AT PRESENT SITUATED AT PIRMUHANI MORE, P.O.-KADAM KUAN, P.S.-GANDHI MAIDAN, TOWN AND DISTRICT-PATNA. ……………………………… PETITIONER Versus 1. CHINTA MANI SINGH, WIFE OF LATE KAMENDRA BHUSHAN SINGH. 2. ARDHENDU SHEKHAR, SON OF LATE KAMENDRA BHUSHAN SINGH. 3. GYANENDU SHEKHAR, SON OF LATE KAMENDRA BHUSHAN SINGH. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-IBRAHIMPUR, P.S.- SARAIYA, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF MAJHOLIA ADARSH NAGAR, P.S.- SADAR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 4. SMT. RAGNI TIWARI, WIFE OF ANAND KUMAR, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- BRAHAMPURA, P.S.-BRAHAMPURA, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 5. LAL BAHADUR SINGH, SON OF LATE SURAJ SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-IBRAHIMPUR, P.S.-SARAIYA, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. …………………………… RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 8.7.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in this application seeking modification of an earlier order dated 24.4.2009 in M.A. No. 35/2009 is that despite a clear observation made in the last but one paragraph by this court in the aforesaid order directing the tribunal for passing an appropriate order on review application as well as interlocutory application filed by the petitioner, no order has been passed till date. The scope of modification/review is well circumscribed and therefore if there is no time limit fixed in the earlier order of this Court dated 24.4.2009, there would be no occasion for this Court to now fix such a time 2 limit by modifying the said order. It goes, however, without saying that if the tribunal has been approached by the petitioner, it is always expected from the tribunal that it would dispose of the matter as early as possible. With the aforementioned observations, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)