IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 4th day of January 2006 Bail Application No. 21 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Virendra Singh @ Veeru S/o Dharam Singh R/o Village Pachapakhariya P.S. Banbassa District Champawat …Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 1888 of 2005 Under Sections 376, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1) XII, 3 (2) V Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, P.S. Khatima District Udham Singh Nagar By the court Hon’ble B.S. Kandpal, J. The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 1888 of 2005 Under Sections 376, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1) XII, 3 (2) V Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, P.s. Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar. Heard Sri R.S. Sammal learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The First Information Report reveals that the applicant has been assigned the specific role of committing rape upon the prosecutrix. The medical examination report of the prosecutrix also shows that her age is between 12 and under 16 years. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any sufficient ground to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 04.01.2006 ASWAL