IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2007 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1929 SA.No. 931 of 1994(C) --------------------- AS.50/1991 of I ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD OS.124/1986 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD .................... APPELLANTS: ----------- 1. VELLACHI, WIDOW OF VELAN. 2. CHANI, S/O.VELLACHI. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- MOIDEEN, S/O.MOHAMMEDKUTTY RAWTHER, RESIDING AT KOPPANNUR, ELAPULLI AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK. (DIED) 2. NOORJAHAN, WIDOW OF MOIDEEN. 3. AZEEZ, S/O.LATE MOIDEEN. 4. AZHAR, S/O.LATE MOIDEEN. 5. AYUB, S/O.LATE MOIDEEN. 6. HAKEEM, S/O.LATE MOIDEEN. 7. ANSARI, S/O.LATE MOIDEEN. ALL ARE RESIDING AT KOPPANUR, ELAPULLI AMSOM, PALAKKAD TALUK. (SUPPL. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS THE LRS OF DECEASED SOLE RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DT. 1/6/07 IN IA.283/01) BY ADV. SRI.A.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.S.SEBASTINE SRI.H.BADARUDDIN (FOR R5) THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. ------------------------------------------ S.A.NO. 931 OF 1994 ------------------------------------------ Dated 2nd November 2007 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel appearing for appellants submitted that subsequent to filing of the appeal respondent died and legal heirs of the respondent are not attempting to trespass into the plaint schedule property and appellants do not have any apprehension of a trespass by them. Learned counsel also submitted that appellants are now in possession of the entire building and in such circumstances appeal may be disposed. Recording the submission appeal disposed accordingly. No cost. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj. ============================= M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. JUDGMENT S.A.NO.931 OF 1994 2nd November 2007 ============================