BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P S No. ’13 (70 [2011 $i“gl& @Qnch :y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. .... ..... . .... . .. PETITIONER : Shambhu Lal Sahu, S/o. Bisauharam Sahu, aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher in the Government Girls Middle School Deori, Bhatapara, District Raipur, R/o. Parsuram Ward (Motibadi), P.S. and Tahsil Bhatapara, Dist‘ Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS :1/ RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.Si Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) x 2. District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3.” Block Education Officer, Development Block— Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) sawmamnam @ &" wFé>M LISQO II “marWm 1H 200 311W m mafigu) v ‘ "’" T WW 'qrrz'sw 1? w tf‘mgrt &3 sifrw m B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mo an Shrivastava 12-08-2011 Wmm‘a Shri A.K.Prasad, counself r the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel L wyer for the State. Heard iearned counsel fqr he parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while in service, the the year 2000 on his own expenses and cost, petitioner obtained D.Ed degree after taking due permission from he Department. He submits that in such case, in view of Govt. Circular dated 24/ 2/1 998, the petitioner is entitied to two advance increments. lt is further submitte that the aforesaid issue has been decided in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bha adwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Burg and another, (2006 (ll) MPJR CG 96 & Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another .P.(S) No.41 30/2005), Learned counsel for the tate — respondent submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representati , the same shail be considered and decided in accordance with iaw and in the lght of the decisions of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj ra) & Gopesh Kumar Verma (Supra). ln view of the foregoing, rothing survives in this petition and the petition is accordingly disposed off. Sd/- ' Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge S J. n o ( p