IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6208 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR @ PAPPU SINGH S/O-Late Chandrika Singh @ Nathuni Singh, R/O-Vill-Saguni, P.S.-Masaurhi, Distt.-Patna. ………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR …………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 30.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 11.11.2008. Just after three months again bail application has been filed here. The petitioner is husband of the deceased in a case under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and the death is allegedly caused within four years of marriage by the greedy in-laws. Submission is that the petitioner has done is best to provide proper medical care to his wife who accidentally got fired. The prescriptions etc. were available. The petitioner has rebutted the presumption and so no offence under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code is made out against him. The 2 injured was brought to the best hospital which has specialized in treating the injury of the burnt. Despite all that the victim could not survive. The petitioner is husband of the deceased and his role cannot be equated with others, so far as his duty towards his wife concerned. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)