IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40847 of 2009 1. BAIJNATH SINGH @ BAIJNATH PANDEY, SON OF LATE SUDISHT SINGH 2. KARI PANDEY, SON OF BAIJNATH SINGH @ BAIJNATH PANDEY BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE NIPINIA, P.S. PHULWARIA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAMODARPUR, P.S. SONEPUR, DISTRICT SARAN (CHHAPRA) ---- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 9.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband is the main person who has made demand of dowry. The allegation against the petitioners is omnibus in nature. Considering this aspect, petitioners Baijnath Singh @ Baijnath Pandey and Kari Pandey are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Complaint Case No. 2484 of 2008 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)