IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.5 of 2009 BARANIYA DEVI & ORS Versus NARAIN DAS & ORS ----------- 2 16/1/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order directing delivery of possession in terms of the decree does not suffer from any error muchless jurisdictional error. The plea taken by counsel for the petitioner that there was vagueness in the decree as place was not mentioned in the decree has been dealt with by the court below and it has been recorded that such vagueness was clarified after perusal of the judgment. That being so, if the Court has gone into this issue to find out with regard to execufibility of the decree, at least this Court will not interfere with the same in exercise of power under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court below is directed to ensure that the delivery of possession is effected within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy 2 of this order. With the above observation this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar