IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 5230 of 2002 Between: Kandi Raji Reddy, S/o. Venkaiah, R/o. Alganoor Village, Thimmapur (M), Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar. 2 The S.I. of Police, P.S.L.M.D. Colony, Karimnagar. 3 Kandi Malla Reddy, S/o. Late Adi Reddy, R/o. Alganoor Village, Thimmapur (M), Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein not to call the petitioner and his family members to P.S. and not to compell them to settle the civil dispute between the petitioner and 3rd respondent and also not to prevent the petitioner and his family members from cultivating their lands in Sy.No.137/c extent Ac.2.14 gts(dry) situated at Algunoor vg., Thimmapur Mandal, Karimnagar District by duly declaring the ation of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the civil dispute and also life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members without following due proceedure under law is nothing but illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 & 21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 5230 of 2002 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged action of the second respondent-Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S.L.M.D.Colony, Karimnagar, in calling the petitioner and his family members to the Police Station and in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the third respondent. It is also alleged that the second respondent has been preventing the petitioner and his family members from cultivating their land to an extent of Ac.2.14 guntas in Sy.No.137/C, Algunoor Village, Thimmapur Mandal, Karimnagar District. This Court, while directing rule nisi, by order dated 01-04-2002 in W.P.M.P.No.6576/02 ordered that the second respondent shall not prevent the petitioner from cultivating their lands in question. The said order continued to be in operation all through. In the counter affidavit filed by the second respondent, the allegation that the petitioner was called to the Police Station and that the second respondent was interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the third respondent has been categorically denied. It is also stated that on 03-12-2001 the petitioner as well as the third respondent appeared in the Police Station and they filed petitions against each other in respect of certain attacks. The second respondent made an entry in the general diary and referred the third respondent to Government hospital since some injuries were found on his person. During the course of the enquiry, the second respondent came to know that both the parties were having civil disputes and the same were pending in the Civil court and accordingly they were advised to get the matters settled in the Civil court. It is also stated that the second respondent has no interest with the third respondent and the allegations levelled against him are false and without any basis. Having regard to the version of the second respondent in his counter affidavit denying the allegations made by the petitioner and in the absence of any other material controverting the stand taken by the second respondent, no further enquiry is necessary in the writ petition. Accordingly, recording the statement of the second respondent in his counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 05-02-2009 KLP