é @ HIEH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILASPUR Wm» Pa+i+ion (s) Na. 3931 af 2003 Petifioner Mnhzsh Kumnr BaghzL Son 0f 5hri Ehupsingh Baghel, @ed about 49 years, R¢sident of Civil Line, Beme‘l’nm, Dis+ric+ Bur-9 (C.G.). Versus Raggandan'ts 1‘ 5mm of C11ha++isgarh, fhraugh 1h2 Secremry, Departmem of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhuwan, Raipur (C.6.). 2. Th2 Cammissianar, Raipur Divisian, Raipur, (C‘GJ. 3. The Coiiacfor, DIS‘h‘icT burg (C.6.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGN$TITUTION OF IbibIA’ sangle Bench : Han'bie Mr. swish K. Agnshom, J. Shri P. P. Sahu, Advom‘ra'for ‘H'ie pefi'rioner. Shri Yashwan‘t singh Thakur, Depuw Advocam 6enera§ for the respondenTs/Sta‘re. ORAL CJRDER (Passed on fhis 23"“ day of Juiy, 2008) With ‘Hnz canan'r af learned counsel appearing for +he parties, 1h: pe'ri'rion is heard finaHy. 2. Learned counsel appearing for 'the pefi'fioner submi-t-s fha‘l' 'fhe pe'ri'rianar does na'r wan? +0 press +his pe‘ti-I'ion an meri‘rs, a? +his stage. Hawever, 'l‘he pe‘l'i‘l'ianer may be permi‘H'ed in make a represem'a'rion befm'e fhe cancemed nu'l'horifies wi‘rhin a period of fhree days and #he same may be direcied 1’0 be considered and decided, in attordance wi‘i‘h iaw, wi'rhin 'the prescribed 'Hme. Shri Yashwm+ Singh Thakur, Ianme& Depu'l‘y Advamfe Gemmi, .oppeoring for fhe mspondenfs/S-roi’e submi-rs fha'r if +he represemafian is made by 'H'Ie pE'I-H'ionar, fhe same dmH be cansiderad‘ and decided by-fhacancemed au‘t’horify, in aacardanm wi‘l'h hm, an H's own mari'rs, wH‘hin a period of Mo weeks from +he da'l'e af receip? af fhe represen‘rnfian. 5hri Thakur further submi-fs +ha1' no mercive steps she“ be mkzn, fin 1he dispo$l af +he represenfafion. In view nf ‘H'ie foregoing, ‘H'se pe'ri'fion sfands disposed of. No order asfo cos'rs. sw— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur