HIGH GOURT GF CHHATTI$GARH BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON ND 365 OF 200A Rash; Prmects Pvt registered uri‘der Chandra Meme Second Fiaer Room ; No 4-A Calcuna R/a 7—A Ashok Bundmg, Avenue Ko!kata 700 029 Ltd a Company Jitendra Agrawal Slo Shn LP aged 35 years the Companies Act 1956 at 2-A Ganesh (WE) through its Dnector ‘ Agrawal havmg its reg‘stered office 1 1 1 Southern (W3) Versus 9 $ Mummpal Corporation Rmpur through its}: Commrssmner Munrcrpat Corporationg Raipur (CG) Corperatron G E Road, EsPoNDENTs Commrssroner Muntcrpal Offiue No 2 (Awas Prakoshth; Ralpur (CG) cle 226i2¢7 0f the Constnutlon of tndra) Smgle Bench Han ble 5hr! Satmh K Agmhatn, J (Wat petltion under Arti Shn Rageev Shnvastava counsel for the petitioner Shn B.P. Shanna Advocate wrth Shn K Sharma counset fo the respondents Shn Vrshnu Koshta counsel for the mtervener t ORAL OR (Passed on trus 29‘“ day or July, 2093) Learned counset apoeanng for the respondents submrts that the work With regard to attotment of ptot or grant of permrssron to cortstt'uct house has been assrgned to the Rarpur Devetopment Authority (for short “the RDA“) He further submrts that he reoresents the RDA atso and the RDA on rts shalt own consrder merits wrthm the gnevances a perrod of of four the weeks petltroner rn aocordance wlth law 3 ‘ ‘ ' 2) before the authontles lf ' ame ehalt also The rntewener may also file an oblectton r permrsarble under the law lf such an objeotron ls fled the s v be oonsndered In accordance wrth law . 3) ln Vlew of the above accordmg to learned counsel for the petrtroner nothrno sun/wee In thus petrtron Accordingly the wnt petrtron ls ‘4) drsposed of quently; I l.A.No.4588/2004 also ‘ ‘ stands ‘ dispsed of. a L Conse @ R r V o E