IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. (T) No. 5112 of 2008 Decided on: 9th November, 2010 Jagdish & others Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge For the Petitioners: Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate For the State: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma Deputy Advocate General For respondents No. 2 to 4: S/Shri T.S.Chauhan and J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocates. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That the impugned Annexures A-10 & A-13, dated 6.5.1998 and 8.6.98 may be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondents No. 1 to 3 may be directed to continue to employ the applicants on the same posts which they were holding before the issuance of Annexure A-10. (iii) That respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 may be directed to explore the possibility of providing alternative employments to the applicants in any Government Departments, Public Sector Undertakings, semi-autonomous bodies and other development projects under execution or likely to be executed in the near future.” 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General, inviting reference to the reply affidavit, submits that the petitioner was only employed by the Society and it was not managed by the State. In view of the stand, thus taken in the reply, in case the petitioner still has any grievance left, he may pursue the same under the H.P. Co operative Societies Act. In the event of petitioner pursuing the same, the same shall not be rejected only on the ground of delay. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Justice V.K. Ahuja ), November 9, 2010(K) Judge