HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ. WRIT PETlTlON No.1202 OF 2002 PETiTmNERS: 1. Jain-Ul-Hasan, Aged about 60 years, S/o Shri Abdul Hasan, Rio Viilage: Telaidhar, Tehsii: Sitapur, Dist. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 2. Deep Narayan Gupta, Agedgabgut 40 years, S/o Late Shri Ramdhani Sao, R/o Village: Ghuturma, Tehsil: Sitapur, District: 'Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 3. Ram Avtar Gupta, Aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shri Rooplal Sac, R/o Village: Ghuturma, Tehsil: Sitapur, Dist. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4. Anwar Hussain, Aged about 55 years, Sfo Md. Hussain, R10 Village: Telaidhar, Tehsil: Sitapur, District: Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 6. Deo Narayan Gupta, Aged about 45 years, S/o Ramdhani Sao, R/o Village: Ghuturma, Tehsil: $itapur, Dist. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 7. Deodhari Prasad Gupta, Aged about 41 years, S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan, R/o Village: Ghuturma, Tehsii: Sitapur, Dist. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 8. Ganesh Prasad Soni, Aged about 4O years, Slo Kailash Soni, R/o Village: Vandana, Tehsil: Sitapur, Dist. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) - Versus - RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the secretary, Department of Agriculture, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5. Timan Ram, Slo Shri Ramnath Kanwar, R/o Village: Ghuturma, Tehsik 'Sitapur, Dist. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 2. State Agricultural Marketing Board, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti. Simpur, District: Surguja (C.G.) 4. Coilector, Surguja, District: Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 5. Sub Divisionai Officer (Revenue), Sitapur, District: Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 6. Chhattisgarh State Civil wifoiies Corporation Limited, Through its District Manager, Ambikapur, District: Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 7. State Bank of India, Branch: Batauii, District: Surguja, Through its Branch Manager. 8. Shri C.L. Banjare, S.D.O. (Rev), Retired, C/o Collector, Surguja at Ambikapur, District: Surguja (C.G.) Present: Mr. Sameer Behar, counset for the petitioners. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State! respondents No.1, 4 & 5. Mr. Vimiesh Bajpai, counsel for respondent No.6. ' Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Qamrul Aziz, Advocate for respondent No.7. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 9'“ March, 2007) As on today, in my opinion, the relief sought for in this writ petition does not survive for consideration of this Court. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is also of the same opinion. 2. ln that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed ‘ . of as having become infructuous. Ordered accordingly. ‘k :‘