THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No :5961 of 2009 ORDER: Petitioner-A1 apprehends arrest in Cr.No.36 of 2009 of Panjagutta police station, Hyderabad registered for the offences under Sections 379 & 420 IPC. 2. The accusation made against the petitioner is that he requested the de facto complainant to give his cell phone and thereupon he used the cell phone and whisked away from the scene along with the cell phone. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent- State. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that A2, who is stated to be associate of the petitioner, came to be arrested on 10-01-2009 and the cell phone, allegedly belonging to the de facto complainant, has been recovered. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 6. As seen from the remand report of A2, it is the petitioner who committed theft of cell phone belonging to the de facto complainant. 7. In that view of the matter, petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail. However, he is at liberty to surrender before the concerned Court and move an application seeking bail on which event, the concerned Court has to dispose of the same expeditiously, preferably on the same day. 8. In the result, Criminal Petition is dismissed. ____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 11th August, 2009 Tsy