IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2802 of 2009 Punam Kumari, W/O Sri Girija Prasad, resident of village Akhtiyarpur (dih Palli), P.S. Paligunj, District- Patna ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Director, Integrated Child Development Services Program, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Bihar, Patna 3.The Divisional Commissioner, Patna 4.The District Magistrate, Patna 5.The Additional District Magistrate, Patna 6.The District Welfare Officer, Patna 7.The District Statistical Officer, Patna Collectariat, Patna 8.The Child Development Project Officer, Paliganj, District- Patna. …………. Respondents ----------- 3. 08/04/2011 Petitioner has challenged newspaper notice issued from the Directorate, I.C.D.S., as contained in Annexure-5, which shows that petitioner’s engagement as Anganbari Sevika at the concerned Centre has been cancelled. Petitioner has also challenged a communication of the C.D.P.O. dated 9.5.2008, as contained in Annexure-6, intimating her that under the orders of Director, I.C.D.S. her selection as Anganbari Sevika has been cancelled. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly accepts that the Director, I.C.D.S. has no power under the Guidelines to cancel selection of Anganbari Sevika. He also accepts that though enquiry was held and 2 petitioner was found to have committed irregularity in running the Centre, but no notice was issued to her by the Director, I.C.D.S. before passing the orders for cancellation of her engagement. In view of such admitted position, this writ application is allowed. The newspaper notice, as contained in Annexure-5, and the communication of C.D.P.O., as contained in Annexure-6 are quashed so far petitioner is concerned. However, this does not preclude the respondents to take action in accordance with law, as may be required. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)