IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19399 of 2011(Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- BIJU, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.M.N.RAJU, MAZHUVANPILLY HOUSE, KOODAPUZHA, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SYNDICATE BANK, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, CHALAKUDY BRANCH, CHALAKUDY, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DIST. PIN - 680 307. 2. AUTHORIZED OFFICER UNDER THE SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT (CHIEF MANAGER), SYNDICATE BANK REGIONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. 3. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA & LAKSHADWEEP), PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM PIN- 680 036, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. R1 & R2 BY SRI. R.S. KALKURA, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19399/2011-Y: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 10/11/2010 ISSUED BY THE R.1. BANK. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 11/03/2011 OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL IN S.A. NO. 140/2011 TAKEN DOWN BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE NEWS PAPER ADVERTISEMENT ISSUED BY THE R.2. DTD. 10/06/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 19399 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 18th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 notification for sale of the petitioner's property under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner admits that the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal and obtained an order of status quo, despite which, Ext.P4 notification has been issued by respondents 1 and 2 is the grievance of the petitioner. I am of opinion that now that the appeal is pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the petitioner has to take up the matter with the Debts Recovery Tribunal itself. Without prejudice to that, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge