BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15574 of 2011 SELVAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUKOGARNAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.379/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.11.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 8C r/w. 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.379 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. Heard Mr.T.Antony Arulraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for bail in favour of the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the petitioner was found in possession of 1.250kg of ganja and the same was seized by the respondent police. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has two previous cases and the investigation is still pending and the plea of the petitioner for the grant of bail may not be considered at this stage. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner has two previous cases and the investigation is still pending and if for any reason, the petitioner is released on bail, there is a possibility of absconding or tempering of witnesses during the investigation and therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 29/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUKOGARNAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 3. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, SUB JAIL, PUDUKOTTAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate SR.No.42125 SR : 01.12.2011 : 2P/5C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15574 of 2011 Date :29/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/