wp3321.10.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3321 OF 2010 Shri Babu Alias Babanrao Govind Sawant ....Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. Digambar R. Kawale for the Petitioner. Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 6. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 20th April, 2010 P.C.: 1 The Petitioner has invoked Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, only with basic prayer to direct the School Tribunal, Solapur to dispose of the Appeal No. 4 of 2009, though on 11/03/2010 the School Tribunal, Solapur already observed that the argument of the other side is not yet over and also fixed the matter for arguments. The Petitioner has already completed his argument. The other side is avoiding the same to delay the proceedings. The learned School Tribunal, Solapur is competent and authorized to deal with such situation, specially in view of Section 10 (3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of wp3321.10.sxw 2 Service) Regulation Act, 1977 (for short, the Act). In view of this specific provisions itself, there is no question of passing any order or direction against the Tribunal. It need not be mentioned that the Tribunal is competent to deal with such situation and dispose of the Appeal as one side has already argued the matter. 2 The Petition is accordingly disposed of, with no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)