IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.652 of 2008 RAJA RAM PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.5.2008 Heard. This is a case under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though in the FIR the petitioner is named and the informant claims to have seen him at the time of fleeing and crossing the culvert on the river, the case is that informant was at his door, when he heard the sound of firing and the occurrence took place near a river, but the description of the P.O. as has come in the case diary shows that the P.O. is quite away from the residence of the informant. Therefore, the informant could not have been seen the petitioner while fleeing away. He also referred to the statement of a witness Manoj Kumar, who though claims to have seen 2-3 persons near the deceased, he did not identify any one of them. In view of the above submissions and after perusals of the case diary, petitioner, Raja Ram Paswan is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 88 of 2006. DKS/ (Rekha Kumari,J)