1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2052 OF 2010 1 Mahesh Ramswami Gaikwad ) 2 Umesh Ramswami Gaikwad ) 3 Manju Shrimant Kamble ) 4 Shakuntala Tukaram Jadhav ) 5 Rahul Tukaram Jadhav ) 6 Milind Tukaram Jadhav ) 7 Dnyaneshwar Tukaram Jadhav ) 8 Tukaram Marappa Jadhav ) 9 Sangita Ramswami Gaikwad ) 10 Mangal Ramswami Gaikwad )..Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra )..Respondent ­­­­ Mr. M. K. Kochrekar for the applicants. Mr. Y. S. Shinde APP for the State. ­­­­ Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 26 th April, 2010 PC 1 The applicants are shown as accused in C.R.No.67 of 2010 registered by the Sadar Bazaar Police station, Solapur for alleged offences under Sections 395, 452, 336, 143, 148, 147, 149, 323 & 504 of IPC. After hearing Advocate for the applicants, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant nos.1 to 8 as there are some overtacts of pelting stones attributed to them. As far as applicant nos.1 to 8 are concerned, Advocate states that instead of inviting observations, he would like to withdraw the application and seeks some time to surrender and apply for regular bail. In the circumstances, application as against applicant nos.1 to 8 is dismissed as withdrawn. These applicants may not be 2 arrested till 30.4.2010. 2 In so far as applicant nos.9 & 10 are concerned, there are no overtacts attributed to them. In my view, investigation can proceed without their arrest particularly as they are women. It is therefore directed that in the event of their arrest in connection with C.R.No. 67 of 2010 registered by the Sadar Bazaar Police station, Solapur, they may be released on bail in the sum of Rs.5000/­ each with one surety each in the like amount subject to the condition that they will report to the I.O as and when called upon by him to do so in writing and they will also attend all dates of their trial unless exempted. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3