IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2011 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 4662 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.33/2011 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1,2 AND 3 ----------------------------------- 1. MAJEESH, S/O.NARAYANAN, THAIKKANDY THAZHE KUNI HOUSE, KUNINGAD, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. RINEESH, S/O.BALAN, KUNIYIL HOUSE, KUNINGAD, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. ANOOP, S/O.NANU, UTTUPARAMBATH HOUSE, KUNINGAD, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT: --------------- THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Appln.No.4662 of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of June, 2011 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.33 of 2011 of Nadapuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447 & 427 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and Sections 3 & 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 20/01/2011. The petitioners surrendered on 01/06/2011. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that the petitioners and others had hurled explosives at the house of the victim endangering human life and causing damage to the building. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence Bail Appln.No.4662/2011 : 2 : and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 21st day of June, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. skj