etétioner is accordingiy entithd to the beueiEts 0wing frem the j Caving} & others Vs» St whaminj this 001111, de that the perma t, w 62 years, in award Shaskiya Seva}; {Adhivarshiki Act, 1967). SI 1 ‘wut ugsL n reuimii 1;: g gvtgm‘poo {Vi 3r" Nag-o .x-mnru) 1 40mg v yEEITEOg‘IER .Saxafaz: Sfc: Kwhayea, ageig gang man. R/o {CG} absut 6 viiiage Seepat, E‘ahsii 0 years) pemnatmni (€12 District Bilaspur WRSUS ES?GNBENTS : 1‘ pug Department State of Chhat‘isgarh‘ DKS Bhawan, Tiu‘cégh fRa Secretary Inigation Executive Engineaz; KhanmgDivision, ipur (CG). Bi! Sub Divisionai 0ffic _ ,(Rashtriya Jal‘Pmbandh), Sub Divis' Biiaspuir (CG). r L ‘ aspuf (CG). Management {WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CON“ E3: Hmfhk M? Smiak K” whaaiz .H Shri Aiok. .“J .Bakhshi, A hm, Advecate Govt, A 1hr the pe‘titieileK Lawyer for the State/respcixdmlts. dvgcate N“ ORAL ORDER (Fassed an 29‘“ day umune, was) ”A.“ ihe censexlt of the parties iinally. . Learned Gamma! appealing ”TITImON OF INDIA) with Shn' Amrim Das, Panel , the matter is taken up for‘ hearing for the patitimwr submits that the petitioner- was appainted as permanent Gallggzan. The p {Edgx‘xuslt and Gide; pagsed in at 5r ac. & ethegg (2007 (2) CGLJ 29), milax‘ly simated gangmen, haw heid sxént gangmei: are ezlt£tled to ha retired on- ance With the previsjcns of the Chhattisgarh -Ayu_j Adhiniyam, 1967 (for short 'the. aling with 3i attaining the 111' A10k Bakhshi, learned GQVt. Advocate, appean‘ng for‘the State bmits tEiat the case of the petitiener is squarely severed by? the 1 WW : Shi‘iSem'eypnfei Vaag nf‘ SH R “ K1 judgmcnt and Ol‘der passad by this Court in the case 0f Govind & others (Supra). 3. Accerdmgly, thié writ petiiion is allowed in the sama‘tmns i.e. thc petitiener, who is pcnnanent Gwgmay is entitle-. tv Lire on a1taining ths aga of 62 wars in agcox'danca with the provisieus of the Act, 19673 subject to vexiflc-ation of tha facts. No arder asto casts. J Inten'm relief, granted earlier, stands discharged. ,