IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21513 of 2010 LALITA SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.06.2010 Heard Mr. Suresh Pd. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for modification of order dated 23.04.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11155 of 2010, whereby the petitioner had been granted bail upon condition that one of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the father of the petitioner had already died and inadvertently this fact could not be shown in the earlier petition filed by him for grant of bail. Thus, it has been urged that any other family member of the petitioner may be allowed to be accepted as a bailor in this case. Learned counsel for the State raises no objection. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let one of the close relatives or the family member of the petitioner be accepted as one of the bailors, however, he or she shall state on affidavit before the court concerned, giving complete 2 genealogy, as to how he or she is related with the petitioner. The order dated 23.04.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11155 of 2010 is modified to the aforesaid extent only. Accordingly, this application stands allowed. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)