IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.47894 OF 2008 LAKSHMAN SINGH, SON OF SHRI VISHWANATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAREYA, POST OFFICE USATI, POLICE STATION BANIAPUR, DISTRICT SARAN (CHAPRA) AT PRESENT, RESIDENT OF VISHNUNAGAR CHANDKHERA, GUJARAT HOUSING BOARD, POLICE STATION CHANDKHERA, DISTRICT GANDHINAGAR (GUJRAT) AT PRESENT WORKING AS SECURITY SUPERVISOR (TRIG) LIMITED, GUJARAT VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHANDESHWAR RAI, SON OF LATE SATYA NARAYAN RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LAKSHAMI TALKIES (CHAPRA KATCHAHARI STATION ROAD), POLICE STATION CHAPRA TOWN, DISTRICT SARAN (CHAPRA) ********** 2 05/08/2011 This application has been filed challenging the order dated 16.07.2008 passed in Complaint Case No. 3495 of 2007 (Trial No. 3093 of 2008) by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra has taken cognizance for the offences alleged to have been committed under Sections 406, 420 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is omnibus allegation against the accused persons, including this petitioner, that they had demanded money to send the son of the complainant to a foreign country. It is submitted that as far as the petitioner is concerned, his role has not been specified and as such, the entire complaint case is unbelievable and vague as it does not disclose the dates on which the money was exchanged. This aspect of the matter 2 ought to be considered by the Court below. These aspects of the matter may be raised by the petitioner at the appropriate stage of the case. The Court below will consider whether the allegations are vague and pass an appropriate order during the stage of framing of the charges, if an application is filed on behalf of the petitioner. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)