Raju HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH' BILA$PUR Writ Peiiiion (3) No. 3747 of 2&68 Petitioner Dr. Pramod Singh, Sio. Late Krishna Pal Singh, aged about 53 years, Rio. DA. Shankar Nagar, Raipur (CG). Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Heakh 8: Family Weifare Department, D.K.$. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Secretary, Health & Family Warfare Deptt. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 3. Shri Babu Lal Agrawal, EAS, Sic. Rajkumar Agrawal, Presentiy Commissioner, Raipur, Rio. Mayur Bhawan, New Timber Market, Fafadih, Raipur(CG). (Writ Petition under Ariicie 226!227 of the Constitution of indie) SB: Hon”ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: shn Vivek Tankha, 8r. Advocate With $hrl P.$. Koshy, oeuneel fer i'ne petitioner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate Generai for the State; GRAL GRDER (Passed on this 5‘“ day of August, 2008 Shri Vivek Tankha. learned Sr. Advocate with Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this matter on merit, at this stage. However, the respondents No. 1 and 2 be directed to conclude the pending departmental enquiry as early as possible, within a period of two months. He further submits that the charge-sheet was issued on 31—5-2007. 2) Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondentslState submits that two months time may not be sufficient, enquiry may be concluded within a period of three months. 3) ln view of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of with a direction that the departmental enquiry may be conctuded as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/-. Satish K. Agnihgtri "Judge