IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.2063/2008. Khuran Constructions, Ajmer. VERSUS Union of India and Others. 08.05.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.D.D.Sharma, for the appellant. Mr.P.C.Sharma, for the respondents. ***** Learned counsel for the appellant submits that on account of the observations made by the learned court below while deciding the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the case of the appellant has been prejudiced by the said observations made in the impugned order. He seeks liberty of this court to withdraw the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to permit the appellant to withdraw the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The said application is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the observations made by the learned court below shall not come in the way of either of the parties during the proceedings that may be initiated. Consequently, the appeal as well as the stay application stand dismissed as withdrawn, as aforesaid. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.