1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6279/2003 (Jagdish Maruka vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 05.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.I.R. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr.B.L. Bhati, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case, petitioner is claiming three bonus marks for services rendered by him under the Guest Faculty Scheme. As per respondents, there is no such provision in the eligibility conditions or the criteria framed by the State Government for providing three bonus marks to the candidates who are working under the Guest Faculty Scheme. The contention of the petitioner is that respondents are granting three bonus marks for experience to those teachers who are working in the aided school on the aided post, but not granting the same benefit to the persons working under the Guest Faculty Scheme which is discriminatory. In my opinion, when the State Government has not chosen to grant any bonus marks for experience to those candidates who were working under the Guest Faculty Scheme, then no direction can be issued to the State Government for providing bonus marks for experience to those candidates who 2 applied for selection on the post of Teacher Gr.II. The contention of the petitioner that he has been discriminated is untenable. The petitioner is claiming three bonus marks on the basis of Annexure-5 the certificate issued by Rajasthan Hockey Association. Upon perusal of the said certificate, it is obvious that in the column of institution, the space is blank, therefore, obviously it cannot be ascertained from the document itself that from which institute petitioner has participated in open tournament, therefore, upon said certificate petitioner is not entitled to get three bonus marks which is provided for district tournament. Thus, there is no force in the writ petition. The writ is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-