1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2072 OF 2005 Navneet Dhirajlal Sheth and Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai & Ors. .. Respondents Ms.Varsha Palav for Petitioner. Ms. Trupti Puranik for R. No. 1. Mr. M. More, A.G.P. for R. No. 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . Notice was issued to the Petitioner on the ground that they had done some temporary construction. It is the case of the Petitioners, that they have filed a reply on 2.5.2005 indicating that the construction was permanent construction. Till date, the Respondents have not decided the same. Considering the above, we direct the respondents after hearing the petitioner and considering the representation to dispose of the same at any rate not latter than eight weeks from today. The hearing and order to be passed is by the Assistant Commissioner (A Ward). . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)