1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1821 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 457 OF 2008 Pramod Shravana Dhoble & ors........Applicants versus Sumant Waghu Dhoble & ors........ Respondents. Mr. Vaibhav Patankar adv. for the Applicants Mr. P.D. Pise i/b Ms. A.R.S. Baxi adv. for the respondents CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 16th FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. Appellant no.6 has expired after the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate court and before filing of this appeal. The appellant no.6 is the mother of appellant nos. 1 to 5. Appellant nos. 1 to 5 have been on record all through out. It is stated in the application that appellant nos. 1 to 5 are the only legal representatives of appellant no.6. Hence a limited prayer is made to permit amendment of the cause title with a view to delete appellant no. 6 and indicate that the appeal is being prosecuted by appellant nos. 1 to 5 in their capacity as pary appellants so also in the capacity of L.Rs. Of appellant no.6. The 2 learned counsel for the respsondent has no objection. Application is therefore allowed and disposed of. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)