IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30686 of 2009 BALISTER SAH SON OF DURGA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 31.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 324, 307, 498A/34, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Even though the first information report is purported to have been instituted by the deceased herself wherein she alleged that she has been burnt to death by her in-laws but before the present information she had given a fard beyan on 8.1.2009 that she had been accidentally burnt. This fact was also supported by witnesses during investigation. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 15.5.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah in Shikarpur P.S.case No.29 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the - 2 - trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )