bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4718 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4718 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4718 OF 2007 Shree Shivaji Sahakari Paani Purvatha Seva Sanstha Ltd. & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Sudhir Janardhan Jadhav & ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH 2. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4719 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4719 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4719 OF 2007 Shree Shivaji Sahakari Paani Purvatha Seva Sanstha Ltd. & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Anilkumar Sambhaji Jadhav & ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH 3. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4723 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4723 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4723 OF 2007 Shree Shivaji Sahakari Paani Purvatha Seva Sanstha Ltd. & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Janardhan Krishna Jadhav & ors. ... Respondents AND AND AND 4. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4728 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4728 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 4728 OF 2007 Shree Shivaji Sahakari Paani Purvatha Seva Sanstha Ltd. & anr. ... Petitioners v/s Krantikumar Janardhan Jadhav & ors. ... Respondents 2 Mr.Prakash G. Lad for the petitioners in all petitions. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the Resp. No.1 in all petitions. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 19TH NOVEMBER, 2008 19TH NOVEMBER, 2008 19TH NOVEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petitioners have challenged the orders passed by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, dated 17.7.2006 as well as the orders passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, on 3.1.2007 in revision applications filed by the Society. These orders were passed on the application filed by the respondent No.1 for being admitted as a member of the petitioner Society. 2. The contentions of the petitioners are that, (i) the share capital of the Society cannot be increased; and (ii) there is a resolution passed which has now been incorporated as a bye-law which does not permit admission of any new member to the Society. The order of the Assistant Registrar indicates that the issue regarding the membership is kept in abeyance till two conditions mentioned in his order are fulfilled. The revisional Court has refused to interfere with these 3 directions issued by the Assistant Registrar. 3. In my opinion, the orders of the Assistant Registrar and the Divisional Joint Registrar cannot be faulted. The authorities below have held that certain pre-conditions must be complied before the 1st respondent in each of these petitions is admitted as a member of the Society. 4. All writ petitions rejected.