IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6473 OF 1999 Smt.Sarojini Digambar Shendge .. Petitioner versus Dr.Ambedkar Smarak Nidhi Samiti and others .. Respondents ... Mr.Vineet B. Naik for the petitioner. Mr.I.M. Khairdi for the respondent no.1. Ms.S.S. Bhende, AGP for the respondent no.3. None for the respondent no.2. CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND CORAM : S.B. MHASE AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 10th January 2006. DATED : 10th January 2006. DATED : 10th January 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent no.1 and learned AGP for the respondent no.3. None present for the respondent no.2. 2. The petitioner and respondent no.1 hand in draft minutes of the order. We have perused the minutes. We are satisfied that the minutes in no way affect the respondent nos.2 and 3. In fact in the minutes, respondent no.3 is only directed to consider on its own merits the proposal which may be sent by respondent no.1 for approval. We are therefore satisfied that the order can be passed in terms of the minutes particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner has since retired. 3. Hence, we pass the order in terms of the minutes which are taken on record and marked X" for identification. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (S.B. MHASE, J)