( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4887 OF 2008 Sau. Aruna Nandkishor Oswal PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. G.V. Wani, advocate for the petitioner. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 17th July, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner did not participate in the proceedings of inquiry under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (for short, “the MCS Act”). The recovery certificate is issued by the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies on basis of the documents produced by the respondent No. 2 – Bank. There is alternate remedy available under section 154 of the MCS Act. The petitioner alleges that she had not ( 2 ) taken the loan to the extent of the amount shown under the recovery certificate and there is manipulation of record. These are disputed questions of fact. In view of involvement of disputed questions of fact and availability of alternate remedy, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/WP4887-08