IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2008 / 2ND MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1574 of 2009(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- WEL-TECH ENGINEERING COMPANY, N.H.17, CHERUVANNUR, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE-673631, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, N.P.ASHRAF, 42 YEARS, S/O.N.P.BEERANKOYA HAJI R/AT.N.P.HOUSE, CHERUVANNUR,FEROKE, KOZHIKODE-673631. BY ADV. SRI.H.B.SHENOY SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY SRI.THOMAS P.MAKIL SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD. 2. T.UMMERKOYA, PROPRIETOR, NAVABHARATH WOOD INDUSTRIES, CHOYYANMKODE, PO.CHAYYOTH, VIA,, NILESHWAR, KASARAGOD. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C).No. 1574 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P8, a preliminary order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in IA No. 19 of 2008 in CC No. 103 of 2006. In my view, it is impermissible for the petitioner to challenge an interlocutory order, resulting in stalling the proceedings and if at all they are aggrieved, the course open to them is to challenge only the final order before the appropriate forum. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed without prejudice to the contention of the petitioner to challenge the final order. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ttb W.P.C.No. 1574 OF 2009 -:2:-