Crl.M.No.M-28776 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-28776 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 29, 2010 Satpal and others .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.J.S.Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.146, dated 31.8.2010, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325, 452 & 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Chhapper, District Yamuna Nagar. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioners for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Allegations against the petitioners-accused are that they entered the house of complainant in the night at about 11.30 p.m., while armed with lathis and sarias and caused injuries to complainant and his wife. As per MLR four injuries were received by the complainant and two injuries were received by the wife of complainant. Co-accused have already been granted concession of anticipatory bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge. No accused has been arrested so far. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners- Crl.M.No.M-28776 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Satpal, Amit @ Sunny and Ram Kumar for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 29.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge