IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3533 of 2008 Date of decision: 6th August, 2010 Ved Vayas Bogara … Petitioner Versus Naresh Kumar … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Rahul Chhatwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondent states that the eviction petition was instituted by Shanti Devi, who during the pendency of the proceedings had died and her son Naresh Kumar has been impleaded as her legal representative. Learned counsel further states that after the death of Shanti Devi, the ground realities have changed and Naresh Kumar will have to plead and prove his personal necessity. This stand has been taken by counsel for the respondent in view of the judgment rendered by Hon’ble the Apex Court in ‘Seshambal (dead) through L.R.s v. M/s Chelur Corporation Chelur Building & others’ 2010(1) Rent Control Reporter 230. Therefore, counsel for the respondent submits that he be permitted to withdraw the eviction petition with liberty to file a fresh one. Counsel for the petitioner-tenant has no objection thereto. Civil Revision No.3533 of 2008 Thus, the present revision petition is hereby disposed of with an observation that the eviction petition filed by Shanti Devi shall stand withdrawn and the respondent-Naresh Kumar, legal representative of Shanti Devi, shall have the liberty to plead and prove his personal necessity in the changed circumstances. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 6, 2010 rps 2