IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 14TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3135 of 2008() ------------------------------ CC.1394/2008 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KOCHI .................... REVN. PETITIONERS: ------------------ 1. SREEJITH, ADVOCATE, S/O. SUDAKARAN, VETTUVLIL VEEDU, NAYARAMBALAM 2. SREERAJ, S/O. SUDAKARAN, VETTUVLIL VEEDU, NAYARAMBALAM 3. PRADEEP, S/O. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI. VETTUVLIL VEEDU, NAYARAMBALAM 4. MANOJ, S/O. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI. VETTUVLIL VEEDU, NAYARAMBALAM BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENTS: ------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM (CRIME NO. 64 OF 2008 OF NJARAKKAL POLICE STATION) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P. RAVEENDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 3135 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 5-09-2008 ORDER Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime 64 of 2008 of Njarakkal Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 323 and 324 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. now pending before the J.F.C.M. I, Kochi in C.C. No. 1394 of 2008 challenges the order dated 10-6-2008 passed by the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offences and issuing summons to the petitioners. 2. Petitioners can very well plead for a discharge at the appropriate stage when the matter comes up before the Magistrate. The petitioner is stated to be an advocate by profession. In case the petitioners file an application for discharge before the Magistrate within three weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of without insisting on their personal appearance before Court. This Crl.R.P. is accordingly disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani/ ani.