IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.65840 of 2011 & Criminal Revision No.1055 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 05, 2011 Matu Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate, for Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The application is for withdrawing the revision petition as the prosecution evidence is already concluded and case is now fixed for defence evidence and arguments. Notice of the application to the non-applicants. On the asking of Court, Ms.Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State. With the concurrence of the counsel for the parties, the hearing of the revision is preponed to today. Application allowed. Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all these pleas before the trial Court. December 05, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE