IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2011 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1933 OP(C).No. 1839 of 2011(O) ------------------------- I.A.NO.2353/10 IN OS.153/2009 of MUNSIFF COURT,VARKALA .................... PETITIONER : -------------------- JALAJAMANI,D/O.KUTTAN PILLAI, SOUPARNIKA,JANARDHANAPURAM, VARKALA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN SMT.M.G.AISHWARYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THAMPI RAJANI, GOPI NIVAS, THYCADU DESOM, THYCADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAURAM 695 014. 2. USHARANI , GOPI NIVAS, THYCADU DESOM, THUCADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAURAM 695 014. 3. SANGEETHA RAMAN,GOPI NIVAS, THYCADU DESOM, THUCADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAURAM 695 014. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OPC 1839/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1: COPY OF I.A.NO.2353/10 IN O.S.NO.153/2009 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA DATED 18.11.2010. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN I.A.NO.2353/2010 IN O.S.NO.153/2009 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA DATED 31.1.2011. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.2353/10 IN O.S.NO.153/2009 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA DATED 31.3.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------- O.P.(C).No.1839 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.153 of 2009 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Varkala, challenges the order dated 31st March 2011 in I.A.No.2353 of 2010, by which the court below allowed the application for appointing a Commissioner to inspect the counter claim schedule property. The respondents filed counter claim and they filed I.A.No.2353 of 2010 to appoint a Commissioner to identify the counter claim schedule property and to submit a report. They also sought for the assistance of the Taluk Surveyor for the purpose of identification of the property. The court below allowed I.A.No.2353 of 2010 and appointed the Commissioner. It cannot be said that the order passed by the court below suffers from any illegality, impropriety or O.P.(C) No.1839/2011 2 from any jurisdictional error. No interference is called for. The Original Petition lacks merit and it is accordingly dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE csl