2S (u HIGH COURT OF GHHftmSGARH ATBILASPUR Sla^eBench; Hon'ble Mr, Justiee Satish K. Apilhotri. Wiit Pfctition No.2284 of 2003 Petitioner R.L.Bhaskar.S/oDhanu Bhaskar, Aged about 59/, years,: WbrkingAsAssistant j | Developiueut Extension OfEcer, Sarganv, Patharia, Mungeli, R/oViUage-BTikril, P.0. Ponch, Tehsil-Janjgir, District-Janjgtrj Chanpa (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Slate ofChhatysgarh, ThrQugli Secretaty DepaTtmient Of Panchayat aad Graaun Vikas, Man.tralaya, Sliastri ChowK, Raipur(C.G) 2. Janpad Paachayat Pandria, TItrough Cluef Executive OfBcer, Pandaria, BflaspUT (C.G.) Shri Prashaat »Jaiswal,Sr. Advocatewith Stui Ali Asgar counsel i for the petitioiier. Shri Paiikaj Shriyastava, patiel lawyer for the State/respondent No.l. . ,., : \ 'L : : : ' : • ' None for respou.dent No. 2. ORALORDER ( 7th Febn.iary, 2006) 1. Learoed counsel for the peti.tioD.er subnuts thatmipugned transfer order dated 24.7.2003 which WEIS under cUallenge has ah-eadiyj ^•. • : • .. ; . . .••.•,-:•, .. :•'.•• -. '• . ^ '. been compUed with by the petitioner, as such thia petition has becoirie uifructuous. Leanied couiisel appeartdgfor ftie respondents have ua objection to this subiriission. ui 2. The petition is accordingfy, disxuissed as haviag becojBi^ infructuous. 1'to'orderas to cost. l Sd/-.;' ; Satish" K. ^Agmhotri •Jddge uTI i 1 1 :