THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.M.P.No.1881 of 2009 and C.M.A.No.96 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: The son of respondents 1 and 2, by name, Rameswaram Prakash, was employed as driver on a vehicle, owned by the 3rd respondent and insured with the appellant. In an accident that occurred on 21.05.2006, he sustained injuries, and died on the same day. Respondents 1 and 2 filed W.C.No.84 of 2006 before the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-IV, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Commissioner’), claiming compensation. Through order, dated 06.09.2007, the Commissioner awarded a sum of Rs.4,42,740/-. The appellant filed this C.M.A., against the same. The appellant and respondents 1 and 2 filed the joint application for recording of compromise. Respondents 1 and 2 agreed to restrict the claim to Rs.4,00,000/-, and to give up the amount awarded over and above that figure. The representative of the appellant and respondents 1 and 2 are present. Both of them vouch for the terms and contents of the petition, and accordingly, the C.M.A.M.P. is ordered. Consequently, the C.M.A. is ordered, directing that, a) in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the award passed by the Commissioner is restricted to a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-; and b) as required under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the appellant deposited the entire amount. In view of the compromise, the appellant shall be entitled to withdraw a sum of Rs.44,125/-, and respondents 1 and 2 shall be entitled for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- and they shall be entitled to withdraw balance of the amount that would lie with the Commissioner forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:12.10.2009 GJ