IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 612 of 1990 Date of Decision : 6.12.2010 Atma Singh .......... petitioner Versus The State of Punjab & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. J.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Harman Sullar, AAG, Punjab. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL) Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 11.12.1989 (Annexure P-2) vide which the probation period of the petitioner had been extended for another period of six months from 23.7.1989 to 22.1.1990. During the pendency of the writ petition the stipulated period of probation has elapsed. The writ petition has become infructuous. It is disposed of as such. 6.12.2010 (RITU BAHRI) 'sp' JUDGE