IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) c^irl' M.C.C. N0. €70t\ OF 2009 [^ H@nc"^ ^ ^'^^.^tf; APPLICANT PETITIONER ^^' ^^'3^K ?i1(N>^. ^^- ^•^'^^r. -r^ ..^>t^ ^•"" NON-APPLICANTS: RESPONDENTS K. Satyanarayan (Ketark Satyanarayan) Son of Late Shri Chandvaidya, aged about 65 years, (Retired Headmaster), Resident of Bhopalpattnam, District Bijapur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Accountant General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.), Through: The Senior Account Officer. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Tribal Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Dantewada (C.G.). APPLICATION SEEKING CORRECTION IN THE ORDER DATED 15.07.2009 I-HC—78 3^T^'f^fN' ^W W^T ^h^ioh d \ / f. i.,^- ^S[ "41'qic'iq, ©-rti^ll<o,[s|(viiy^< . ^ (L-C. ^r^j ^^^ ^.^^........V.y...-:....-..........^..^..^..,.^ ^QQ^ 3TI^?T Tf3RR' ( ^I^^) ^tiT^ "^f^f ^i^y SB : HON'BLESHRI JUSTICE P&ITINKER DIWAKER 08.08.2009 Shri Ashok Kumar Shuklaj Shri Arvind Dubey, P.L. fq^ This is an application file<( the order dated 15.7.2009. It has| petitioner that due to some of 15 days. The Committee sh|au omitted from being typed in the c| typo^aphical The omission pointed out to be correct. Accordingly, the 4l dated 15.7.2009 is modified.No^ be read as under : "On this being done, the petitioner and officers conceme^ Committee shall consider and pa^ affording due opportunity of order shall remain as it is. ^Tf??f^Tzft^ "RTR^ff ^f f^x2t iFal^K ir3tfm3?T^r counsel for the appHcant. 1 the State. ^ by the applicant for correction in been pointed out by counsel for the mistake, the words "period consider and passw have been Iperative portion of the order. |)y counsel for the applicant appears ^pplication is allowed and the order the said portion of the order shall Committee shall issue notice to the ^ within a period of 15 days. The ^s order in accordance with law after to the petitioner." Rest of the he^iring Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge