3^ ^WW^, ^S-^\W[(o, fc|(r)l<H^< ^ll^dl sh^lch —iY^l^W ^ll^ yStt& (^ftg^BT^ W^TcFTf^TT^ cT§TT3TT^T$h^l<=h ^TT^K^fNw^T ; ^l^Krfl ^ te^ <f^F^Rb! w KT:n ^ ^K .^rp T;-,:;^^^^^ ; .^y^^^ ,^ ^. .-i ^7 SB: HON'BLE SHRI DHIRfcNDRA MISHRA. J. MISC. AltPBAL N0. 17 OF 2003 APPELLANT CLAIMAJffTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANT8 Even m. iy:e4second <| 1. Kanila Bai wtfe of Saroj Kumar, aged about 35 years 2. KhUesh Kuraar son of Saroj Kumar aged about 12 years. Sl. No. muior, through guardian iaotih.er Kamla Bai wife of Saroj Kumar. Bofh residents of viUage Bhendra TehsU Kurud, District Dhamtari Vs. 1. Onkar Prasad son of Goviad Ram., aged 31 years, resident ofvillage Pachpdei, TahsU Kunid, Distt. Dhanitari 2. Shahbaj Khan, son of Jkulmmaa Khaa, aged about 51 years, resident of Nayapara, Thaaa God Bazar, Raipur 3. The New India Insiiraace Compaay Ltd,, Raipur Vikas Pradhikarau Bhawaii, Raipur (CG) 11.07.2007 None for flie appeUa^its. Shri Dashrafh. Gupt^, counsel for respondent No,3. ^all none appears for fhejappeUants. In view of the abo^e, fhe appeal is disniissed for warxt of prosecution. Sd/- DHIRENDRA MISHRA Judge P.T.O.