IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 11448 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 1.9.2011 Vijay Kanwar and another ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, Advocate for the complainant. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Neither husband nor the complainant is present in Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that husband of the complainant was arrested and has already been released on regular bail. The petitioners have already joined investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that when the complainant had gone to the house of the petitioners to effect recovery of dowry articles along with her father and the police officials, paternal uncle of the husband incidentally fell down for which FIR has been got registered against the complainant and her father. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that though the petitioners have joined investigation, however, recovery of jewellery is yet to be effected. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts mentioned above, in my opinion, the efforts for re- conciliation may not give result considering the conduct of the parties. The petitioners have already joined investigation. They can not be put into custody merely for alleged recovery of jewellery. Considering the aforesaid fact, interim bail granted to the petitioners on 20.4.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 1.9.2011 Judge Meenu