^€SS^,. /d"'^ "\ Ei.^SsaSi'A '"<i^,^y^^ge_78 sn; ^ B sn^r ^ii T<;'f1'+ ?TSff SrTT^T "^ft^ ^flt, 3's^ "4i<ii<n<4, siinl'M'is, fsjtfli^y »J^.^<.52..^.o..:..s^.%£ 3n^?fTT^T (' p) 'FHIW ^<T 3)I^[ PETITIONBR Jagd^iaba Prasad Chaturvedi, aged about 56 v^ars, S/o Shri Ramnath Chattuvcdi, Resid|ent of I3rimary School, North JhQg^akhaad, District Koica (CG) RESPONDEMTS 1. Stat D.K. 2. The of Chhattisgarii, through. -Secretary, of School Education, Mantralaya, p. Bhawaa, Raipur (CG) Depijrtaient Koi^, 3. Prtm|ary Throjugl Edu<t Kor^i 4. The Pen^i S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J. 30.09^2008 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, coujisel for the petitiouer. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy pA for the State. Heard. '^prf^ftTT Tn^f "^ 'f^st ^RT^K ^T sffiptr an^r Versus pistrict Educatiou Olficer, Korea, Distdct- h C.G. School North Jhagarakfaand, jugb Headinaster, Siaghi CoUieiy (•ation Society, Jhagarakhand, Uistt.- L(CG) IDirector, Directorate, PubUc Institution, jioa Bada, Raipur (CG) Writ Petition U/A 226/227 ofthe Constitutioa oflndia With the consent ofthi By this petition, the Teacher ia Priiaarv School, b parties, the matter is heard finaUy. petitioaer, who is workmg as Assistaat Jhagrakhand, District-Korea is c]ajmin.g the benefits of 5th Pay Comjmission at par wifh their counteiparts ia the Govemment Schools. T^ie 5th Pay Commission was to be granted Wt r!it?:fflq: 'jtl'l'tlllliflltf^- s^ ^i%ti-jms^f^sm^S^S»^'swR}^•^s'%s"sm.^^s^^s^^^^s^sw WStSS ss ^^« T w^r^if^fw WW 3TI^1 *t('W ^ 'I^RpaH *<i*iwi tfi*ira» 'S^ '<ii<4i<n<i, attly'is, fs(dl-Llli,< —^.i?.(.&?...'/v<?.:....^'...?'.C^200% sn^r Tr3Ri' ('^f^^tT) with effect from 1.1.1996 RevisionofPay Rules, 1998. This Court by the judg of Smt. A LaU Vs. State ofi (W.P. No.4108 of 2005) held| aided schools are entitled fo] Pav Coiiunission. After thel i|a accordaace wifh the Madhva Pradesh .^nent aud order dated 6.2.2007 in the case phhattis^irh and other coiuiected matters that the teachers working in. Govenunent fhe benefit of recomuiendations ofthe 5th [decision of this Court, the petitioner has respondents authorities, wh^ oenduie consideration befol aufhorities are accordingly| dated 2.8.2008 (Annexure accordaiice wifh law, on iN aad order dated 6.2.2007 p4 ^(^CT^II 'ETPT^if ^f 'fe^ TfaT^TC ^affinsirt'?! ffled fhis petition ou 25.9.20p8 clamung the saine relief. y Learued counsel app^anng for the petitioner submits fhat the petitioner has inade represejitation on 2.8.2008 (Annexure P-2) to the 'h was not considered at all. In view of the fact tt(at the representation of the petitioner is re aufhority concemed, the respondents directed to consider his representation P-2) pendiag before respoiident No. 1 ia own inerits, ia the Ught of the judgment ssed bv this Court in the matter ofSmt. A LaU (Supra). The petition is accord^ngly disposed of. jy. €^ ^^ ^^^