Criminal Misc.-M No. 15695 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 15695 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 8.8.2011 Jaivir Singh .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion on 19.7.2011, this court passed the following order: “On 26.5.2011, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that Bharti, whose molestation has been alleged in the FIR, was not even the student of Acharya Kul Kanya Mahavidhalya, Lowa Kalan, Bahadurgarh. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the State. However, he submitted that there is practice in the school to keep the students there about 10-15 days and then grant them formal admission in the school. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that on 26.5.2011, he had raised an issue that the complainant was not residing at the address given in the complaint, though an affidavit by Investigating officer has been filed stating that the Criminal Misc.-M No. 15695 of 2011 [2] complainant was living at the address given in the complaint. However, he has produced in court a certificate issued by one Vijay Lata, who is stated to be the owner of the house in which the complainant alleged to be residing, stating therein that no person in the name of Veena ever resided at that address. He further submitted that the FIR is a result of a dispute between the management. The Principal of the school was arrested and has already been released on regular bail. The petitioner is the Secretary of the Society and is 60 years old. Let petitioner join investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer on 28.7.2011 at 10.00 AM so as to get his version recorded, and thereafter whenever summoned. However, in case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the aforesaid facts, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 19.7.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 8.8.2011 mk