IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (S/S) No. 7160 of 2001 Vinod Kumar Jain and others ………….Petitioners Versus Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. and another ……...Respondents. Present : Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondents. Heard Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent. The petitioners are employees of a Government Company known as “Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd.” The grievance of the petitioners, raised in the present writ petition is that they are not getting the pay-scale to which they are entitled to. Hence, they have filed the present writ petition. During the pendency of the writ petition, an order was passed on 24.3.2011 by which, according to the counsel appearing for the respondent company Mr. Sandeep Kothari, at least a part of the grievance of the petitioners has been satisfied and settled. After hearing the rival contention of both the parties, this Court feels that since a part of the demand of the petitioners has already been made, the writ petition is finally being disposed of with a direction that for the remaining part of the grievance the petitioners shall move a separate representation within a period of 2 three weeks from today before the Managing Director, “Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd.”, who shall thereafter pass a speaking order therein within a period of six weeks from the date such a representation is received. With the above observations, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 29.9.2011 Avneet