IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2011 / 14TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 35233 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. R.UDAYABHANU, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.P.RAGHAVAN, HOUSE NO.XXI/1172, PUTHENVILA POOMANGALAM, ATHIPOZHI, ARIYAD ROAD, MUNDAMVELI, COCHIN-5. 2. MINI.V., W/O.R.UDAYABHANU, HOUSE NO.XXI/1172, PUTHENVILA POOMANGALAM, ATHIPOZHI, ARIYAD ROAD, MUNDAMVELI, COCHIN-5. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLICKAL, NEAR PARIPPILLY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 604. 2. PRASANNA KUMAR, S/O.REGHU, NEETHU BHAVAN, PAKALKURI KULAKKUDI, PALLICKAL, NEAR PARIPPILLY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 604. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.CHARISHMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 35233 of 2010(D) - 2 - APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT DATED 20.07.1998. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO.C.270/09 DATED 06.08.09 ISSUED BY THE SUB REGISTRAR, NAVAIKULAM TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 23.06.1994 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE RE- SURVEY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT PREPARED IN A.L.C NO.2151 OF 1994 DATED 21.11.1994. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30.12.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 26.09.2007 PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA IN I.A.NO.542 OF 2007 IN O.S.NO.223 OF 2007. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT, O.S.NO.223 OF 2007 FILED BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R NO.153/07 DATED 18.09.2007 OF PALLICKAL POLICE STATION. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 26.08.09 SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 11.09.2010. /TRUE COPY/ R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.35233 of 2010 ***************************** Dated this the 4th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. Petitioners are spouses. They have come to this Court seeking police protection. Their precise grievance is that the 2nd respondent, with whom the parents of the 2nd petitioner have a civil dispute, is obstructing the petitioners from visiting the parents of the 2nd petitioner at their residential house. 2. The 2nd respondent, though served by affixture, has not chosen to enter appearance. The learned Government Pleader after taking instructions from the 1st respondent submits that if the petitioners want to visit the parents of the 2nd petitioner at their residential house using the panchayat road as access, there will not be any obstruction. The learned Government Pleader submits that as a matter of fact there is no obstruction against the petitioners visiting the parents of the 2nd petitioner at their residential house though the panchayat road. Interim directions to that effect were issued on 22.12.2010. 3. We are, in these circumstances, satisfied that no further directions are necessary in the matter. We record the W.P(C) No.35233 of 2010 2 submission of the learned Government Pleader that the petitioners shall be at liberty to visit the parents of the 2nd petitioner at their residential building through the panchayat road without any obstruction. Recording that submission/undertaking of the learned Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is dismissed. 4. Hand over a copy of this judgment to the learned counsel for the petitioners. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/