IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 13045 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.08.2011 Bhavi Chand ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH J. Mr. Rathee produced the record of Selection Committee in a sealed cover. On the directions of the Court, the sealed cover is opened and same is placed before the Court. I have perused the result sheet. The marks awarded to the petitioner are 111 in all. The petitioner is stated to have secured 100 marks in written examination and 11 in viva. This record was summoned to ascertain the factual position because, at one stage, the petitioner was intimated that he had secured 126 marks. It appears that this communication was addressed to the petitioner due to some inadvertence. I have perused the mark sheet. Marks awarded are 111. Apparently, there is no allegation of mala fides alleged against anyone. In this view of the above factual position, the petitioner apparently had secured less marks than the last selected candidate Civil Writ Petition No. 13045 of 2010 -2- in the BC(A) category and has, thus, not been selected. No case is made out to interfere in the selection. Dismissed. August 03, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) rts JUDGE