IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-15225 of 2009 Date of Decision:14.1.2010 Bikkar Singh .... Petitioner Versus Sikandar Singh .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the respondent states at the bar that the petitioner has since died, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel for petitioner states that he does not want to press the petition. Dismissed as not pressed. 14.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE