: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1409 OF 2007 Shamrao Y. Kamble ....Petitioner V/s. Krishnat D. Kamble & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.V.S. Gokhale for the Petitioner. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 11TH JULY, 2007. P.C. : 1. The Petitioner had filed a suit for partition in respect of three properties ’1/A’, ’1/B’ and 1/’C’. In an application for interlocutory reliefs of injunction to restrain the Defendants/Respondents from dispossessing him otherwise than by due process of law, the trial Court granted the reliefs only in respect of property ’1/C’. In Appeal, the learned District Judge, Kolhapur granted an injunction in respect of property ’1/B’. Aggrieved by the order in so far as it does not grant any injunction in respect of property ’1/A’, the Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 2. As far as property ’A’ is concerned, there are concurrent finding of fact that the Petitioner is : 2 : not in possession of the said property. Considering the record, it is difficult to state that the findings are absolutely unwarranted or perverse. I see no reason for interference with the findings. Needless to clarify that these findings are only prima-facie and will not bind on the Petitioner at the final hearing of the Petition. 3. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed.