IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-27033 of 2008 Date of decision : 6.11.2008 Israil .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. S. D. ANAND, J. Though it is beyond the pale of controversy that the petitioner over shot an earlier parole, there also is no controversy that he never came to be prosecuted for the dereliction. The rules concededly provide that a prisoner over staying the parole period can be denied further release of parole for a period on two years which, it is common ground, is presently over. In the light of the foregoing discussion, the petition shall stand disposed of. The competent authority is directed to pass an order on the parole plea of the petitioner within one month from today in the light of the above observations made by this Court. It will be for the State counsel to communicate the order to the competent authority. Copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Court Secretary. November 06, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE