IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 288 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Sri Ram Prakash Bhasin S/o Shri Chanan Singh, R/o 25/17, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. 2. Shri Kaushik Bhasin S/o Shri Ram Prakash Bhasin, R/o 25/17, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary (Home), Govt. of Uttaranchal, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. (U.A.) 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Rajpur, Dehradun District Dehradun, Uttaranchal. 3. Shri Shallender Kothlyal s/o Shri S.L. Kothlal, r/o Gajrada, Sahastradhara Road, Dehradun, District Dehradun, Uttaranchal ………….. Respondents Sri Bhupendra Bisht Advocate on behalf of Sri S.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Bhupendra Bisht Advocate on behalf of Sri S.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the Police after the completion of the investigation did not find any case worth filing charge-sheet against the petitioners and as such has submitted final report in the case before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 21.03.2006 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 2941 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 10.07.2006 10.07.2006 A