IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2009 / 28TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23473 of 2003(T) ----------- -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ C.P.GOPINATHA MENON, "PRIYA", ASRAMAM ROAD, KALADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.VIDYASAGAR RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CULTURAL SOCIETY OF ANGAMALY, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, P.V.POULOSE, O/O THE CULTURAL SOCIETY OF ANGAMALY, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.MATHEW ZACHARIAH FOR R2 SRI.KOSHY GEORGE GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2009, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 17016 OF 2003 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 23473 OF 2003 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Nothing survives in this Writ Petition for consideration in view of the judgment in the connected case viz., W.P.(C) 17016/2003. In this case, on behalf of the first respondent, a counter affidavit has been filed wherein it is stated that pursuant to the judgment in the said Writ Petition, fresh orders have been passed on 17/09/2003, in and vide proceedings No.M1-1837/2003. As per the said order, the society viz., the second respondent herein, was directed to cancel the amendment of the bye-law adopted by it on 21/08/1998. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to quash Ext.P3 amended bye-law dated 21/08/1998 as ultra- vires to the provisions of Sub Sections (1),(2),(3) of Section 7 of the Travancore – Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955, viz., the amendment of the bye-law directed to be w.p.c. 23473/2003 2 cancelled by the aforesaid order dated 17/09/2003. In view of the said subsequent developments, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner has any further grievance, he can pursue the same, if advised. Subject to the same this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE SS