IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7177 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.124/2006 OF PEECHI POLICE STATION,THRISSUR DISTRICT) ..... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2: ------------------------------------------- KALESH, S/O. KITTU, EDATHADAN HOUSE, KALLIKKALKUNNU DESOM, KODASSERY, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.7177 of 2010 ------------------------------- DATED: 12.11.2010 O R D E R Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.124/2006 of Peechi Police Station, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in before the J.F.C.M-III, Thrissur the case against the petitioner has been re-filed as C.P. No.56/2010. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non- bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. With the above observation this application is disposed of . V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj