-HC-22 T3 "i<l<<ld<<, afll+i'ie, facii'My wwir cbMi<^ SIT^T xrag? _4J.(?....2.3^:.. ''WI. 200 G ISre^sT' sn^r^i r<;-ii+ snisi ?h*-) <ifia •-{- 311^1 wnwofOT PETITIONER ^ Smt. Vija^ Sharma, posted a^ Prasad 9\ Secondary | R/o Brahi|n Durg, Disljt Versli 'aldn RESPONDENT8 1. State of Chliattisgarh, Through Tljie Departmentl |ie Secretary, School Education DKS Bhawan, Ralpur (CG) 2. The Undei Departnient 3. The Districi Durg (CG) S.B Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mlshra. J 15.12.2008 Mr. P. Diwakar, Sr. Advoc; for the petitioner. Mr. YS Thakur, leanied Dy transfer order dated 22.11.2005 working as Lectui'er (Chemistry] been transferred to Distt. Jagdal Mr. YS Thakur, leamed submits fhat this Court vide ord i*l<<I<'f'il-f IIICII'? feIZt <[«]tSK ^ SlPgH 3IRRT Laxmi Choubey, W/o Rajiv ;ed about 48 years, Presently Lecturer (Chemistr^') Bangali wamkar (BPS) Govt. Higher |School, Dhamda, Distt. Durg (CG) ^aan Fara, Near Di-urga Mandu", Duig [CG] us Secretaiy, School Education DKS Bhawan, Raipur. Education OflScer, Durg Distt. Writ Petition under Article 23S6/227 of the Coastitution of In^ia .te with Mr. Adil Minhaj, counsel AG for the State. The petitioner, by tUe insl.ant petition, has tmpugned her , whereby the petitioner, who is and posted at Distt. Diii^, has &ur. py AG appearmg for the State ler dated 17.1.2006 has directed ft^^fia^ ^ [-HC-22 sn^i^T h-u* sf^v sh-i-i «f?a -6; ^ i- '3^ •^11*11<"1<<, »Ti1*l'l<».(°«ni«y *<w<?fr ai*<ich snif^r irag? ^^..L..SS.^'.... "WI, 200 6 •fa^ST' sii^i^grw^itei "i- q4o pugrted for maintaimng fhe status-qi: working on her present place of time, fhe order unpugc meanmgless. The State has and the order tmpugned, so quashed, wifli liberty to fhe Sl matter of transfer of the p^ exigency. In view of above State, fhe instaat petition Aiinexiu-e P/l, so far as it However, tlie State shaU be at| the matter of transfer of fhe exlgency. and stnce fhen the petitioner is t>f posttng. Therefdre, witli the lapse has become redundant and objection ifthe petition is allowed as it relates to the petitioner, is )ate to pass appropriate order in flie ^titioner under fhe adiainistrative no Ifcr subidission chN[(n^1Ti )Ri-4cff ^ 1^^ <^)-^.i< ^7 sipgii an^r of learned counsel for fhe is aUowed. Iinpugned order of r^lates to fhe petitioner, is quashed. Bberty to pass appropriate order tn betitioner under the administrative Sd/- Dhirendra Mishara Judge [TT^ ^fo^