IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32809 of 2009 UMESH MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 12.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is denying his having concerned with the cultivated plants if were meant for production of opium. Prosecution report is clear on the point that one Janardhan Mahto is the owner of the field who was present at the field when raiding party reached there. Doubt is caste on behalf of the petitioner that if the owner of the land was there in his field, plantation by this petitioner how can be believed for rejection of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Excise Case No. 48 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of District and Sessions Judge, Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)