HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, J. M.C.C^No, 494 of 2011 Applicants f~~—^ 1. Smt Jyoti Verma, w/o Late Narendra Verma aged about 35 years 2. Ku Sarikal, d/o late Narendra Verma, agedabout 16years 3. Ravi Verma, s/o late Narendra Verma, aged about 16 years 4. Ku Monika Verma, d/o late Narendra Verma, aged about 14 years All through his natural guardian mother Smt Jyoti Verma, w/o late narendra Verma aged about 35 years All r/o Chhote Attarmuda, Raigarh Tahsil & Distt Raigarh VERSUS Respondents Sardar Jagatar Singh s/o Sardar Chhota Singh aged about 28 years, occupation vehicle owner, r/o 77, C.R. Avenu Calcutta 12 & 20 Bagmari Road Calcutta 54 (West Bengal) Moh. Aslam s/o Moh. Nishar Khan, aged about 30 years, occupation vehicle driver, r/o village ware, Thana Barampur distt. Gajipur U.P. (Died) Omitted. The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Division 512800, 11, Prafull, Sarkar Street Calcutta - 72, (West Bengal) Smt. Prabhudani w/o aged about 57 years Navin Xalxo '::':—^\ ^Si^. I ~'n / MCCNo.494 of 2011 '^ 5 Ku. Anita Xalxo d/o Navin Xalxo aged about 25 years. 6 Ku. Kurbani Xalxo d/o Navin Xalxo aged about 22 years. All residents Rambhata Raigarh Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh C.G. ApDlication for restoration of M.A. No. 832 of 2004 Present: Shri Amit Sharma, counsel for the petitioners. ORDER (23rd August,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on I.A.No.01/2011, an application for condonation of the delay in filing the restoration petition. 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the application, we are satisfied that the petitioners have succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in fiiing the restoration petition. 3) I.A.No.01/2011, therefore, is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4) Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners is heard on the restoration petition. 5) The petitioners are seeking restoration of M.A. No. 832 of 2004, which came to be dismissed for noncompliance of the peremptory order dated 01.11.2004. •;^;" ^"^•••'^ MCCNo.494 of 2011 mmmi 6) On due consideratjon of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, M.C.C. No. 494 of 2011 is allowed and M.A. No. 832 of 2004 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge