PETITIONER: ESPONDENTS / R SINGLE BENCH §/° IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) VERSUS /' State of Chhattisgarh 1. 27 Mantralay Raipur (C.G) Under Secretary Department of School Education D.K.S Bhawan Mantralay Raipur (C.G) Director, 3. Public Instruction, Rajpur (C.G) /. Ku. Tarsila Ekka Aged about 38 years D/ o Shri Habil Ekka Presently working as Assistant Statistics Offlcer O/o The District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G) Through Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S Bhawan, w.P.(syNo. (q‘zw; [2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4§ M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PmTINKER DIWAKER W.P.(8).NO. 6236] 20 1 1 Ms. Ritu Mishra, counsel for the peu'tioner. Shri Q.V.Shridhar, P.L. for the State] respondents. WRITW PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (19.10.201 1) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that she is entitled for her promotion to the post of Assistant Director (Planning) from that ofAssistant Statistical O$cen Counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that she is only praying for the disposal of her pending representaiion by the competent authority. State counsel points out that the petitioner has made mpresentation recently i.e. on 5.10.11 and Without waiting for sufhcient period she has rushed to this Court and therefore the f petition is liable to be dismissed. Be that as it may, as the petitioner has already made a representation it is expected from the competent authority to consider and decide the same as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. With the above observation, the petih‘on stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. ,1. Mé/dIT Pritinker D‘Wake' ,/Jd/g// W.» e ‘» i PETITIONER Ku. Tarsila Ekka versus RESPONDENTS State of C.G. 65