IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 19681 of 2007 Between: 1 Smt. L. Munirathnamma Wo.L. Kuppuswamy R/o. 6-11-123, M.C.R. Colony, Tiurpathi, Chittoor District. 2 Smt. S. Subbamma W/o.S. Muniswamy R/o. 6-11-123, M.C.R. Colony, Tiurpathi, Chittoor District. 3 A. Rajeswari D/o.A. Changal Rayudu R/o. 6-11-123, M.C.R. Colony, Tiurpathi, Chittoor District. 4 Smt.Y. Vanajakshi W/o.D. Haribabu R/o. 6-11-123, M.C.R. Colony, Tiurpathi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 2 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupati Urban, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 Vice Chairman, TUDA & Municipal Commissioner I/c Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not allotting the House sites to the petitioners to the extent of Ac 0-25 cents each comprised in Sy.No. 41/1 of Tirupati Town, Which is in the occupation of the 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary null and void and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to allot house sites to the petitioners forthwith following the letter of the 2nd Respondent addressed to the 3rd Respondent vide Roc No. 1593/2003 dt.3-3-2004 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.S.V.INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No.19681 of 2007 ORDER: This is a writ petition instituted by four individuals, in substance, seeking a direction to the third respondent to allot them house sites of an extent of Ac.0.25 cents each in Sy.No.41/1 in Tirupati Town, which is claimed to be in the occupation of the third respondent. Heard Smt S.V.Indira, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. An identical writ petition in W.P.No.18166 of 2005 filed by eight individuals claiming identical relief has been dismissed by this Court by recording reasons therefor on 22.04.2009. For reasons alike, as recorded in W.P.No.18166 of 2005, there are no merits in this writ petition and the relief claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted. This wit petition is also therefore dismissed for reasons recorded in W.P.No.18166 of 2005. Registry shall enclose a copy of the judgment in W.P.No.18166 of 2005 to this judgment. GODA RAGHURAM,J Dt.22.04.2009 usd