S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6567/08 Kamal Saraf v. Raj. Financial Corporation Date of Order:- 29.1.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA Mr.Usman Gani for the petitioner. Dr. Rakesh Sinha for Mrs. Pratishtha Dave for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was directed to value the suit for Rs.10,42,515/- which is the value disclosed in the demand notice issued to the plaintiff by the respondent financial institution. It is not in dispute that said amount is mentioned in the demand notice. The petitioner- plaintiff's prayer 12(ka) is very specific wherein the petitioner sought declaration that the demand raised by the notice dated 30.8.2007 may be declared illegal and un-authorised and thereafter, sought consequential relief of injunction. The relief No. (kha) under relief clause, that is para 12 of the plaint is also of the same effect. In view of the above and in the light of the decision of this Court delivered in the case of Samdukhan v. The Rajasthan State (RLW 1957 126), I do not find any merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA)J mlt.