IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15918 of 2011 1. VAKIL RAM Son of Late Ramavtar Ram 2. Ranjan Kumar, son of Vakil Ram, both residents of village- Milan, P.S- Balna, Dist- Begusarai. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 31.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State The offence alleged against the petitioners is under Section 365,323,120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioners who happens to be the father and son have been falsely implicated on the accusation that the daughter of the petitioner no.1 Punam Kumari is being married with some other person. It is submitted that the allegations are false as would be appearing on perusal of the complaint filed by the said Punam Kumari for the alleged offence under sections 498A and 307 of the Indian Penal Code against the complainant of the present case. Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to refute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs, 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khagaria in Complaint case no. 42c of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Namita ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)