$~12&25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.2554/2008 & IA No.9251/2009 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC). LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Mr. Vishal K. Panwar and Mr. Vishrut Raj, Advs. versus ABDUL GHAFFAR & ANR .... Defendants Through: Ms. Ekta Mehta, Mr. Shreyans Singhvi and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advs. AND + OMP No.300/2001 & IA No.8552/2010 (under Section 151 CPC). SHIV NATH RAI HARNARAIN (INDIA) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Mr. Vishal K. Panwar and Mr. Vishrut Raj, Advs. versus ABDUL GHAFFAR A. REHMAN .... Respondent Through: Ms. Ekta Mehta, Mr. Shreyans Singhvi and Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R % 15.11.2016 1. Neither the counsel for the plaintiff/petitioner is available nor the counsel for the defendant/respondent is available. Both seek adjournment. 2. Though the senior counsel for the defendant/respondent had appeared in the morning when the counsel for the plaintiff/petitioner was not present CS(OS) No.2554/2008 & OMP No.300/2001 page 1 of 2 but had stated that he will not be available thereafter. 3. In the circumstances, today’s adjournment is granted subject to plaintiff/petitioner and the defendant/respondent each depositing costs of Rs.10,000/- with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Lawyers’ Social Security and Welfare Fund, New Delhi as a pre-condition for further hearing in the matters. 4. List on 11th January, 2017. RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J NOVEMBER 15, 2016 ‘pp’.. CS(OS) No.2554/2008 & OMP No.300/2001 page 2 of 2