IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.706 of 2010 1. MANOJ KUMAR S/O LATE KISHORI PRASAD R/O VILL KAPRAULI ROAD, SITAMARHI, P.O.+P.S.SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, SINHA LIBRARY ROAD PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD,SINHA LIBRARY ROAD PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD,SINHA LIBRARY ROAD PATNA with CWJC No.779 of 2010 1. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI RAMASHANKAR SINGH R/O VILL.- KAPAR PAKUR, P.O.- KAPAR PAKAR, P.S.- SIKARGANJ, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN 2. KAMESHWAR SINGH S/O SRI RAJESHWARI SINGH R/O VILL.- SEMRA, P.O.- SEMRA, P.S.- CHIRAIYA, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN 3. GAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV S/O SRI JAI GOVIND RAI R/O VILL.- PAREI, P.O.- KAPUR PAKURI, P.S.- SIKARGANJ, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN 4. UMA SHANKAR PRASAD S/O SHRI SHANKAR RAI R/O VILL.- PUCHI, P.S.- SIKARGANJ, P.O.- KAPUR PAKAR, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN 5. GANESH MISHRA S/O RAM SUNDER MISHRA R/O VILL.- MUNU TOAL, P.O.- BOKANE KALA, P.S.- PATAHI, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN 6. UMA SHANKAR RAI S/O METHUR RAI R/O VILL.- DUMERIYA, P.O.- MAKSUALPUR, P.S.- MIRPUR, DISTT.- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD SINHA LIBRARY ROAD, PATNA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD SINHA LIBRARY ROAD, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, SINHA LIBRARY ROAD, PATNA ----------- 3 5.7.2010 Petitioners’ prayer in both the writ applications is for a direction to the respondents to publish their results, which has been withheld since 1994. Petitioners have appeared in the examination held in the sessions 1985-1986 from Central Sharirik Shaikshik Parishad, Sitamarhi. The students of Sessions 1985-1986 were 2 allowed to appear in the examination conducted in the year 1994 but their results were not published and necessary certificates showing them successful in the examination were not issued. Petitioners’ case is that the students appearing in the examination made several attempts and approached the respondent authorities of the Board for publication of their results but without there being any reasonable and valid ground, it was not published. Finally the students filed writ application for publication of their results and on the direction issued by this Court the results of the petitioner in CWJC No. 518 of 2006 and CWJC No. 11785 of 2006 were published. Petitioners are claiming that their cases are identical to the case of petitioners in CWJC No. 12408 of 2008. Petitioners in both the writ applications have appeared in the examination as regular students. They were regular students of same Sessions i.e. 1985-1986 and appeared in the examination in the year 1994. It has also been accepted that the objection is being now raised by the Board that the petitioners were not sent up to take 3 up examination in Rajendra Nagar Patna or their age limit at the time of taking admission for the course was less than the age as provided under the Rules. All these questions were considered and finally the stand of the Board was rejected by the order passed in CWJC No. 12408 of 2008 and a direction was issued to the respondent to publish the result of the petitioners in that writ application. I find substance in the submission made by the petitioners. With the identical facts and identical grounds, there is no reason not to allow similar relief to the present petitioners, as it has been allowed to the petitioner of CWJC No. 12408 of 2008. The prayer of the petitioner is allowed. The respondents are directed to publish the results of the petitioners which has remained withheld since 1994 and also issue the certificates showing that they have passed out the examination. The results must be published within four weeks from the date of production/communication of this order. Immediately thereafter certificates must be issued in favour of the petitioners. 4 These writ applications stands allowed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar