F IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH Si' C&se ^ \ l^ CONTEMPT(PETITION)NO./-^-;> /2006 w PETITIONER -»*- . -^ ^yy ^.^/ -\ •i£:. Smt. Chandralata Rai, Aged about 49 years, W/o. Dr. P.K. Rai, Project Director, Integrated Child Development Project Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh Jawahar Shrivastava Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Women & Child DevAlopment, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Also holding offlce of The Director, Directorate of Women & Child Development Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Shri Ravi Kumar Sharma, Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Takhatpur, Distrirt Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Sanjay Garg Collector, District Korba, Chhattisgarh L.R.Kachchhap District Women & Child Development Officer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT REGARDING CIVIL CONTEMPT AND ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 20/07/2006 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P. N0.3579/2006 2. ^.J^ 3. ^^^ ^ ^.^' '6^yif\l/~'/ o*' <<%^< -t>-" ^' 4. XI-HC-78 sn^r^rfeN; (isn'3ti^rsh>< Aw-e <41«<WI Stl*1|tt> 3:5T'<ii<ii<-i<<, tSTfl'M'is, Ri<nwy ..Ufk..C^^.[i^^^ ^ 200 ^ 3n^?ri<5i<»)(yl^aiyr) s^iren'HfN'an^T <tii'iif<'i41-< Hiw<iTfftei^t<(«i«i< ^; Slf^IT 3n^T period of30 days from 20U' July 2006. petitioner submitted that representation on 24th July 2006 (Annexure-C/2), even 11-1-2007 Shri Ranbir Singh Marha^, counsel for the petittoner. Heard. This contempt petition l|ias been filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with p(ovisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for violatfon of this Court's order djated 20*^ July 2006, whweby respondent No.1 was directed to decide reriresentation (rfttie petitfoner which was to be filed by the petitkmer within a| Learned counsel for the| was submitted by the petitionei| then while passing the order da^ed 10PI November 2006, Amrtta Beck has menhoned that no representatio|n was made by the petitioner. Moreover, substitute Ravi Kumar has al|'eady joined. Lestfned counsel further submitted that Ravi Kumar nev^r Joined on tha post of the petitioner and he joined on the post somewher^ else. In the circumstances, re^pondent No.1 is directed to look into all the points raised by the peUtfoner and decide representatkm of the petitioner afresh, as also flie fact that Ravi Kumar never joined on the post of the peBtioner and pass appi|opriate order wtthin a period <rf 6 weeks from the date of receipt of copy <^f this order. The petUioner is also directed to submit all Ihese papers i(icluding copy of this pettUon and his representation before the respc|ndent No.1 within a period of one week from today. The pefition is disposed cf accordingly. Sd/- AcUng ChiefJustice x P.T.O. ^ /X \