1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2615 OF 2009 Kapil Kailash Suneja & Ors. ..Applicants versus Polyrub Extrusion India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for Applicants. Mr. Subhash Jadhav for Respondent No. 1 Mrs. R. V. Newton - APP for State. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 31ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. This is an application for quashing of the complaint against the Applicants lodged with the Chakan Police Station vide C.R. No. 6 of 2008 against them on the ground that the matter is settled between the parties in accordance with the consent terms dated 23rd October, 2008. 2. The learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 admits the consent terms. Under the consent terms vide Clause 6, it was agreed that after the Applicants made payment in accordance with the Schedule referred to in clause 3, they would file an appropriate application for quashing the 2 complaint without any further demand. The learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 accepts that the entire payment has been made in accordance with the Consent Terms. 3. Having regard to the nature of the dispute, which is essentially private in nature in between the parties in which public at large is not concerned, I consider it appropriate in the interest of justice to quash the proceeding. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as follows: “(a) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the F.I.R. being C.R. No. 6 of 2008, registered at Chakan Police Station, Pune pursuant to order under Section 156(3) of Cr. P.C. passed in R.C.C. No. 56 of 2008, in the interest of justice.” 4. Order accordingly. (S. A. BOBDE, J.)