IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6660 of 2008 SANGEETA KUMARI, D/O SRI YADUNANDAN PRASAD AND W/O SHAILESH PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE-NIMRA, P.S.-DHANARUA, DISTRICT-PATNA.…………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA. 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, DHANARUA, DISTRICT-PATNA. 5. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT NIMRA, BLOCK-DHANARUA, DISTRICT-PATNA. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4 01.08.2011 The prayer of the writ petitioner in this writ application is very simple. It is pointed out that, vide Annexure-4, order of the Collector dated 15.10.2007, the engagement of two Shiksha Mitras namely, Brajesh Kumar Singh and Geeta Kumari was cancelled. It is submitted that the resultant vacancies are still continuing and the respondents have not taken steps to initiate process for fresh selection for filling up those vacancies. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner only desires that the process of selection for filling up those two vacancies may be started by the respondents in accordance with law in which the case of the petitioner may also 2 be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. It is needless to say that, if the vacancies are available, and there is no order of any competent authority or a Court restraining the respondents from taking up steps for filling up those vacancies, the respondents are under legal obligation to start the process for filling up those vacancies. At that stage, if the petitioner applies, her case may also be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)