IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2010 / 9TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 27880 of 2010(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SRI.JAVERT G.AKKARA, S/O.GEORGE, AKKARA HOUSE, HILL GARDENS, PLOT NO.101, KUTTANALLUR (PO), THRISSUR DIST. BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.DHANIL, SRI.JOBY JOSEPH (THRISSUR). RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SMT.ROSY, D/O.RAPPAI, PARAKKADAN HOUSE, THALORE (P.O), THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 306. 2. SHRI.MANI, S/O.KRISHNAN, KINATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THALORE (P.O), THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 306. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, K S E B OFFICE, OLLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT -680 306. 4. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 003. R3 BY SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN, S.C, R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.27880 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the action on the part of the 3rd respondent to draw electric lines for granting electric connection to the residential houses of respondents 1 and 2 through the property of the petitioner, this writ petition has been filed. According to the petitioner he had never given any consent for drawing electric connection through the proposed route and therefore, he has raised objection before the 3rd respondent. Evidently, based on the objection raised by the petitioner the matter was referred to the 4th respondent in accordance with the provisions. The matter is now admittedly, pending before the 4th respondent. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that the enquiry including the site inspection has been conducted by the 4th respondent and 3rd respondent was directed to submit a report regarding the alternative proposal made by the petitioner during the site inspection. On receipt of such a report a decision will be taken after hearing the petitioner and the concerned respondents. This is recorded. As the matter is, thus, pending before the 4th respondent, there is no need to WPC No.27880/2010 2 pursue this writ petition. Accordingly, after recording the above submission this writ petition is closed. However, the 3rd respondent shall not draw electric lines to grant electric connection to respondents 1 and 2 through the petitioner's property without obtaining orders from the 4th respondent. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE jma //true copy// P.A to Judge