••<£-. 't^" ^ MMH 60URT GF eMHttTT^feVtH AT»Ut»UR VDrtSKMSWw CORAM ! WWfWSWSQ.S/WtSWWUU.A.AgC.S. ' MON"BtE SWI SATISH K. A6WMOTRI. J. Writ Petttton (O No.6183 of 2007 Ptititioner Respondents 1. Ku Trtpti Mieahrtm, aged ttoout 18 yecB's, t>/o Shri DcepeA Ncrtht(ji Me^iram, resident of Tetephone Coteny, Quartw No.Type 111/4, Ncyaparo Jagdatpu-, District Bastar (C$) State of Chhattisgarh, ThnwK^i s The Seewtwy, Oepai-tment af Hwtfe <nd Family Welfare, &KS BhoNffln, Roipur \C6) , The Oinsctor', bir'eetorcrt'c <»f Bdian Atedicat System anA HomeepaWy; CHhattjsga4i, Raipur (G6) ' The +ligher Power Ser'uMnyCBnmrittws of ccet* certtflccl* O/o Cbmintetioner Scheduled CtUite and Scheduted Tribe &evelopment, Chhattisgarh Ralpur(C®) Writ oetition under Article 22<6 ofthe Conatitutton efBaiMu 2. 3. Pfcsent : Shrl Rakesh Arrthwiy, counsd for the petitloner. Qft/S. (Passed on 26* (fctofaee. ZSOO^ The foltowing order of the Court- ineei pesMd-by Monbte Jttldtlh Bhtdln,^ C.J. Learned counset appearing for the pe'IMlower infiN'ms •ttiat' thts petition has become infruetuous. Similarly sH'uated cggrteved Instttutions opproaAed to the Apex Court choltergin9 •the refusal forycmfrof permiasion/ruwiwil fer conchicting BE)S cow^es durlng 2007-08'by the Central ffaiwnment; whieh wus'disposed of wlth few consequenttd dlrectfen/8bMrvffMflna Nrittiout examinin9 the merits,i)y its.judgmen* dated 28t11 Septembw, 2007, in Wrtt 2.- Petitton (Cwil) No.359 of 2007 (Avadh Bnstitute of Dental Seiencea Vs Union of India and Afwrtier) aid otho- connected mattws. In view of the above, -thfa petitlon has become Infructuous nnd';ia accordingty dlaniaseA Hoi»wer,1titsdlsmtad te withoutppejuAce to •the rl9hts andcontenttorS and nserving liba^y to challerge the I'e^ectton, if it beGoma»nece»euywithreference to 2008 -09. Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice SA'- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge padma