IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3750 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3749 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Vs. Sajid @ Pana Moiddin Shaikh .. Respondent Ms. A.S. Pai, APP for applicant-State. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. SMT. R.S. DALVI,JJ. Date : January 25, 2006. Date : January 25, 2006. Date : January 25, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned APP. The State of Maharashtra has challenged the order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay on 18/1/2005 but belatedly and, therefore, this application for condonation of delay. 2. As per the office note delay caused is of 28 days and we are satisfied that the explanation furnished makes out good and sufficient case to condone the delay. 3. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) (Smt.R.S. Dalvi,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle, J.)