IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3331 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- TRISUNS CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD Versus FORWARD MARKETS COMMISSION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BR GUPTA for Petitioner MS PJ DAVAWALA for MR AKSHAY MEHTA for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 03/05/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT It appears from the copy of the document Annexure.B at page 17 of the petition that on 6th September 1999 in Special Civil Application No.6238 of 1999 filed earlier by the petitioner, this Court had given directions that the concerned authority will consider the representation of the petitioner within a reasonable time. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that his representation for an action forthwith for stopping the unauthorised and illegal speculative business in Castor Seeds at Bhabhar, District Banaskantha, Gujarat, under the Forward Markets (Regulations) Act, 1952 has been pending since September 21, 1998 followed by subsequent representations. His grievance is that despite this Court's order dated 6th September 1999, his representation is not being decided and no orders have been passed uptil now. It is given out by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent that in case the representation has not been decided, the same shall now be decided within one month from the date the certified copy of this order is produced before the concerned authority. It will also be open for the petitioner to move contempt petition if the earlier order dated 6th September 1999 is not complied with. 2. In view of the observations as aforesaid, learned Counsel for the petitioner does not press this Special Civil Application. The same is hereby dismissed as not pressed. Rule is hereby discharged. No order as to costs. Direct service is permitted. (M.R. Calla, J.) ****** Sreeram.