IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 21433 of 2010 Date of decision: 28.7.2010 Parmesh Kumar Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and anr Respondent Present: Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR as well as the conviction order on the basis of compromise in an offence u/s 341/355 IPC Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that offences are compoundable. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that this court has certainly got a jurisdiction to permit the compounding of the offence on the basis of compromise but since the matter is pending before the lower appellate court for 28.8.2010, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, with a direction that it will be open to the appellate court to record a finding on the basis of the statements of the parties that the matter has been compromised. In case the appellate court is satisfied that the matter has been compromised as per the compromise deed dated 16.7.2010, the trial court will permit compounding of the offence or to grant any relief, taking into consideration the compromise deed. July 28 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE