1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.S. No.973/2010 in Second Appeal No.352/2004 ( Vijay S/o Vishwanath Chinchloe ..V/s.. Laxman S/o Kadataji Takote & others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : SMT. V.A NAIK, J. DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2010. Heard Shri Palshikar for the applicant and Shri Saboo for the non-applicant/appellant. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the prayer made in this civil application cannot be granted. The prayer made in the civil application is rejected. Civil application is disposed of. C.A.S No.972/2010. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the contents of the civil application. This Court has not permitted the deletion of the name of respondent no.1-A. In such circumstances, the applicant Om Sadanand Gawande may be joined as respondent no.3 to the appeal as Shri Saboo, the 2 learned counsel for the appellant does not have any objection for joining the applicant Om Sadanand Gawande as party to the appeal. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. Second Appeal No.352/2004. Shri Palshikar appears on behalf of the newly added respondent no.3. Judge Tambaskar.