IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 35060 of 2011(F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.V. RAJAN, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.P.V.APPU, REGISTERED ARCHITECT, CHALAKKOD, P.O., PAYYANUR, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY, PAYYANUR, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 307. 2. SECRETARY, PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY, PAYYANUR, PIN - 670 307. 3. CHAIRPERSON, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY, PAYYANUR, PIN - 670 307. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: NK WP(C).No. 35060 of 2011(F) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13 -01- 2004, ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER P2 COPY OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF RESOLUTION DATED 29 - 05- 2004. P4 COPY OF LETTER DATED 23-08-2007 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO CHIEF TOWN PLANNER P5 COPY OF LETTER DATED 28-08-2008 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER P6 COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 13-05-2011. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE NK HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 35060 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of December 2011. JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed for a direction commanding the respondents to effect payment of balance remuneration payable to the petitioner as is admitted by the respondent in Ext.P4 following Ext.P1 agreement and for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P6 representation within a time frame. 2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, in the admission list, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P6 representation is pending consideration before the 3rd respondent and requests this court to direct the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the Ext.P6 representation within a time frame. 3. In view of the limited relief sought for as afore stated, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents. W.P.(C) No.35060/2011 2 4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 representation dated 13.5.2011 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE al