IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37757 of 2009 1. MD. PARVEZ, son of Late Parmar 2. Md. Guddu, son of Late Kalat Mian 3. Md. Nassen @ Nassu, son of Late Kudrat Mian All the above three are residents of Mohalla Chaubal Tola, Sabzibagh, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.11.2009 No one appears for the petitioners even on second call. Counsel for the State is present. The allegation against the petitioners being one of picking pockets u/ss 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code gets not only substantiated by the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the recovery from the co-accused but also the fact that the petitioners have been found by the court below to be professional pick pockets. The situation has not been easened by the counsel for the petitioner either by remaining his absent or even making a statement in the bail application with regard to the criminal antecedent of the petitioners. That being so, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected for the present. They may, however, renew their 2 prayer for bail after completing further six months of their judicial custody. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/