1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.768 OF 2011 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.209 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.2998 OF 2009 Deepak Sampat Plaintiff versus Rajendra Danthi and others Defendants Mr.Induprakash Tripathi a/w N.R.Dubey i/by C.K.Tripathi for plaintiff. Mr.Sanjay Jain i/by Ramesh Jain for defendant nos.1, 2 and 4. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 5th May 2011 PC : 1. The learned advocate appearing for the defendant nos.1, 2 and 4 has handed over a pay order of Rs.17,15,000/- towards principal amount and a cheque of Rs.2,07,123/- towards interest @ 15% p.a. on the delayed installments aggregating to Rs.17,15,000/- to the learned advocate for the plaintiff. The learned advocate for the plaintiff tenders original documents to the learned advocate for defendant nos.1, 2 and 4. In view thereof, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). However, it is clarified that this order shall not preclude the plaintiff from taking out any proceedings for implementation of clauses (5) and (6) of the consent terms which if taken out shall be decided on its own merits. The Chamber Summons is accordingly disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)