IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 143 of 1993 with CIVIL APPLICATION No.7001 OF 1996 ** For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble THE ACTING CJ R.A.MEHTA and MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- Bajrangpura Dudh Utpadak Sahkari Mandali & anr. Versus State of Gujarat -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Special Civil Application No. 143 of 1993 MR HARIN P RAVAL for Petitioner Shri T.H. Sompura, Asstt. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the respondents. Civil Application No.7001 of 1996 T.H Sompura, Asstt. Govt. Pleader of the applicant Shri Harin P. Raval for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : THE ACTING CJ R.A.MEHTA and MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 09/04/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT : (Per R.A. Mehta, Actg CJ) The Special Civil Application challenges the notification for holding election of twelve members of the Committee and one member to the Managing Committee of Surendranagar Zilla Shakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd. It is clear that the election programme has expired and the petition has become infructuous. In fact the subsequent elections have been held and results were declared on 16th September 1995. These facts are disclosed in Civil Application No.7001 of 1996, which has been served on the parties in August 1996. There is no denial to these facts. 2. In view of the above, Special Civil Application No.143 of 1993 is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relif is vacated. No order as to costs. 3. No order is necessary on Civil Application. (R.A. Mehta, Actg CJ) 9th April 1997 (R.K. Abichandani, J) karim*