IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3642 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 17, 2010 Nachhatar Kaur and another. …Petitioners Versus Jagsir Singh. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Lakhwinder Sidhu, Advocate, for the respondent. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition filed challenging the judgment dated 30.05.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mansa, whereby learned Additional District Judge allowed the appeal and dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs-petitioners herein under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.R. No. 3642 of 2009 C.P.C. While issuing notice of motion, this Court vide order dated 06.07.2009 directed the parties to maintain status quo. Both the learned counsel appearing in the matter made statement at the bar that parties shall maintain status quo qua the possession and nature of the property till the disposal of the suit and the Trial Court be directed to decide the suit itself at the earliest without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, pointed out that prior to order dated 06.07.2009, he has sold the entire property. In view of the statement made hereinabove, parties are directed to maintain status quo till the disposal of the suit and the learned Trial Court is requested to decide the suit itself on merits in accordance with law. The learned Trial Court is further requested not to grant any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Present petition is disposed of accordingly with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. August 17, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2