IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Review Application No. 133 of 2011 in Writ Petition No. 1705 of 2005 (S/S) Nasar Ahmad Khan ….…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………. Respondents Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the review applicant / petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel (Govt. of Uttarakhand) for respondent No. 1. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Date of Judgment: 15.03.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) Delay Condonation Application No. 1648 of 2011 Considering the averments made in the application for condonation of delay in preferring the review application and being satisfied with the reasons furnished therein, we allow the application. Review Application No. 133 of 2011 Admit. By consent of the parties, the review application is taken up for hearing. 2. The review has been sought for only on the ground that subsequent to filing of the writ petition and before the writ petition was decided by the judgment and order under review, petitioner was finally allocated to Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam. The fact that the petitioner was so allocated was not brought to the notice of the Court, despite petitioner being aware of the same. 3. That being the reason, no ground for review is made out. The application fails and the same is dismissed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 15.03.2011 15.03.2011 Amit