IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 211 OF 2006 Ashok Madhav Naik ... Petitioner V/s. Brihamumbai Municipal Corporation.. Respondent & Ors. Ms. Sindha Shreedharan for the petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.1. Mr. Bipin Joshi for respondent Nos. 2 & 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 29th March, 2006 : 29th March, 2006 : 29th March, 2006 P.C. . Reply has been filed on behalf of the Corporation, stating that so far as one Shri Nagrani is concerned, notice was issued on 17.03.2006 and steps for demolition will be started as soon as statutory period is over. In so far as Shri Patel is concerned, statutory notice is served on 17.03.2006 and on completion of statutory period, they will proceed according to law. In so far as Shri Desai is concerned, it is pointed out that Notice was issued on 24.05.2004 and the occupant himself removed the structure. Thereafter, said Shri Desai has again reconstructed the said extended ground floor structure and notice has been issued on 20.01.2006 against which a suit has been filed wherein the respondents have been restrained from acting on or demolishing the said ( 2 ) notice. 2. We are satisfied that, so far as respondent Corporation is concerned, they have taken whatever steps they can. In the light of that, no interference is called for. Petition is disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]