WPSS No. 255/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala,J. Mr. Sachindra Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, the learned brief holder for the State. The petitioner is a Peon and has been suspended on a charge that he had kept an important file from 29th December, 2009 till 15th February, 2010, on account of which a sum of Rs. 144 Lakhs could not be drawn from the treasury and the said amount lapsed at the end of the financial year. Assuming that the charges leveled against the petitioner is correct, the court cannot fathom as to why the amount was allowed to lapse when the file was discovered on 15th February, 2010 and the amount could have been drawn on or before 31st March, 2010, for which there was an ample time for the respondents. Further, prima facie the charge is not such which would warrant imposition of a major penalty. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself with the direction that the suspension order dated 30th March, 2010 will remain in abeyance till the conclusion of the enquiry proceedings. The Enquiry Officer and the Disciplinary Authority is directed to conclude the enquiry within six weeks and pass a final order from the production of a certified copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of. Any observation made in this order is only tentative in nature and cannot be utilized by either party. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated: 17.4.2010 Nishant