IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2008 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11141 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ NIRAPPUKATTIL TIMBERS, CHEMBUMUKKU KAKKANADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SABU, NIRAPPUKATTIL HOUSE PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, K.V.A.T CIRCLE-1, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS-II) COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. BY G.P. SRI.K.P.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.11141 of 2008 .................................................................... Dated this the 1st day of April, 2008. JUDGMENT Even though there is no scope for interference with Ext.P5 order, I feel some interference is called for because petitioner is stated to have closed business in 2001. In the circumstances, W.P. is disposed of modifying Ext.P5 by reducing payment to 20% as against 40% ordered by the appellate authority. The petitioner is granted one month time from today to make payment. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms