1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.764/2008 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.514/2007 (Decided) M/s Maloo Finance Company ...Versus... State of Maharashtra and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Mahesh Gupta, Adv. for applicant] [Shri J.B. Jaiswal, APP for respdt. Nos.1 & 2] [Shri S.K. Sable, Adv. for respdt. No.3] CORAM:- K.J. ROHEE & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED :- 16.04.2008 1. Heard learned Counsel for original respondent No.4 (applicant herein), learned A.P.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Counsel for original petitioner (non-applicant No.3 herein). 2. It has been brought to our notice that the original petitioner has not acted as per the directions of the order of this Court, dated 12.10.2007 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 514/2007. Since the custody of the 2 truck was already with respondent No.4, he moved the R.T.O. authorities for issuance of fresh registration certificate under the provisions of Sub Section 5 of Section 51 of the Motor Vehicle Act. However, the original petitioner did not allow the authorities to proceed to transfer of the vehicle by saying that the matter is subjudice before the Court. Since the matter has been disposed of in October, 2007, now there is no hindrance for the R.T.O. authorities to proceed with the matter. The present application is disposed of with a direction to the R.T.O. authorities to proceed under Sub Section 5 of Section 51 of the Motor Vehicle Act according to law. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande