IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29429 of 2010 LAL BABU MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tajpur P. S. Case No. 287 of 2009 registered under Sections 414/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that one person was apprehended with the stolen Motor Cycle. Subsequently, police suspected the hands of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though police suspected the petitioner’s hands also but the person apprehended did not name the petitioner. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. However, the person who was apprehended has been granted regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 33667 of 2009. Let the learned court below pass appropriate order accordingly 2 when the petitioner files his regular bail application if possible it may be disposed off on the same day. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)