IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 27th November, 2008 Order on the bail application of accused Criminal First Bail Application No.679 of 2008 CRIMINAL SIDE Neeraj Chauhan, S/o Het Ram. …..Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Opposite Party Arising out Case Crime No. 1578/2008 Under Sections 356/411 IPC. P.S. Kashipur, District U.S. Nagar. _______________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Government Advocate for the respondent-State & also perused the record. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R.; the fact that the mobile is recovered from the possession of the accused applicant; the fact that the learned Addl. G.A. could not demonstrate that the IMEI no. shown in the recovery memo is connected with the mobile given in the F.I.R.; and in the facts & circumstances of the case, I deem it proper to release the accused applicant on bail. Let the accused-applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 27.11.2008 V.K.