1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 71 OF 2009 Chandrashekhar Kisan Madke & 3 Ors. Vs. Bhimrao Tukaram Ghotekar & 5 Ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Rajeev Chhabra Adv for appellants. Shri J. P. Kothare Adv for respondents. CORAM: C. L. PANGARKAR J. DATED: 7 th DECEMBER, 2009. Heard counsel for the appellant and the respondent No.4. Respondent No.4's counsel makes a statement before the Court that his client does not intend to alienate or transfer the suit property in any manner during the pendency of the suit. This statement of the learned counsel for respondent No.4 is accepted. In view of this statement the learned counsel for the appellant does 2 not want to prosecute the appeal. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Respondent No.4 shall be bound by the undertaking furnished before this Court. JUDGE svk