v( m THE mGH COimTOF JUDICATURB AT BII.ASPUMC.G.l WMT PEmiOn RO. ^70-^2004 vsrmQSER. ^^7 ^ff^ .^^ ^'y^r^ v ^y^ I!ISHNA MURARI MISHRA, SON OF SHRI VISHWANATH MISHRA, AGBD ABOUT 48 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS SUB- INSPECTOR, POSTED AT P.S. BHANSI, DANTEWADA, SOUTH BASTAR (CHHATnSGARH) ^y^ ^c^ RBSPOMDBHTS VE^OS IM'W i. mlaspur THE STATE OF CHHATHSGARH, THROUOH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OP HOME (POUCE), MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR(CHHATnSGARH). THE DIRECFOR GENERAL OP POLICE, POUCE HQ., RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POUCE (ADMINISTRATIN), POUCE HQ.,: RAIPUR (CHHAmSGARH). $ THE ,SUPERINT?NDENT OF POUGE, DANTEWADA, SOUTH BASTAR(C.G.) WWT pBvmovt um»mi ARTICLB 226/227 OF VH& coBSTiTixnoit or nroiA FOR issuAaca OF WRIT m THB KATORB OE' MAnDAMOS. C9MNnORARI. VROIUBI'nOir ADD FOROTHBRSaiTABlAl»iaTC»^raiTS.C>IUOBR<»RORDBTO. wssxyfwsaR DiHactioBis. !i^l]ii!i-~]l IHW an^TWK'lw ~SSV 3i?T^?T sb*flq» ^ 3 T'-<i:i^tciA|, ®;nE<i-i<!s^.fa(ru*fyT |..|. ^|..|il^||, ::j. ®n^?iw> (t<;itg''iyi) ^mw ^ift?r sii^ii 18TO1/200S • '.; K !.., ^Smt.-Reema Dubey, counsel • Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for tt Heard. '' The petitioner has filed th| respondents in relieving him in pur^ which has been passed on has not beeri Felieved by the The matterwas taken up on had prayed for time to seek instru( relieved. However, learned couns^ traoeable ahd therefore he Gould Howeverhesubmitsthathedoesnf .1-lavjng'considered the facj material on reeoFd ahd furtfier; passed on 04/08CQ04 and despife therefore the inaotion of the Statt sustained and the petition deserv^i allowed. The respondents are diret ftom the date ofthe copy of the Consequently M.W.P. No. disposedof. . , , %l<<t.CT<ll'IH11<'tl' S1%1?t <f"lt^l< '^STRFTSII^I . -i |forthe petitioner. , leState.. . |s petition ohallenging the inaction of the juanoe of the transfer order of Annexure P-1 04/08/20p4 and even after more than five months, he responitients.. : - . 12/01/2005 and learned Counsel for the State jtions as to why the petjtioner has not been for the State submits that the'file is not not seek iristmctions as prayed eariier. (ftipppsethe'petiti&n."' ^ antf Gireumstances of the case and tbe cof^sicienHg that the transfer order has been tt'jat^the petjtioner has not.bgen relieved and ;by nofe relieving^ the' peiitioner cannot be to be allowed. Accorclingly ttie petjtion is ^ed to. relieve the petitiQner within 15 days prptfuction-oftheorder.' i' ' . 14997^004 and I.A: No. 9354/2004 stand Sd/- / Dhirendra Mishra Judge Gjrj 'i,ii/. OKJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000.