IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8805/2008 Decided on:22.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Mangat Ram. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Yash Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. M.P. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has not been given the benefit of award dated 16.8.2001 rendered in reference No.51 of 1997. 2. Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the State has filed a petition against the award dated 16.8.2001. No material has been placed on record by the parties about the outcome of the petition. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 petitioner, in case the award has attained finality, for regularization/conferment of work charge status. Needful be done within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 22.12.2010 *awasthi*