1 cri appln 4252.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4252 OF 2010 (The State of Maharashtra Vs. Deepak Badamrao Shinde) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 24th February, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard learned A.P.P. for the State. Perused the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Court below and also the evidence made available for perusal. On perusal of para 19 of the impugned judgment the Court has considered the allegations in its entirety against the accused Nos. 2 to 5/present respondents. On the scrutiny of evidence the Trial Court found that there are no any specific allegations of cruelty and harassment against the accused Nos 2 to 5. In that view of the matter, the Trial Court acquitted the accused Nos. 2 to 5/present respondents. So far 2 cri appln 4252.10 accused No. 1 is concerned, there is allegation of beating and assault and in that respect this Court has admitted the appeal. 2. On independent scrutiny of evidence, I find that there are no specific allegations against respondents/original accused Nos. 2 to 5. Except bear words of the witnesses that the accused Nos. 2 to 5 were abusing and accused Nos. 3 and 4 were taunting, were not offering food and keeping her on fast. Except that there are no specific allegations as such to meet the ingredients of Sec. 498-A or Sec. 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The Trial Court has taken a possible view and acquitted the accused Nos. 2 to 5/present respondents. In my opinion, no case is made out for leave to appeal against the present respondents i. e. original accused Nos. 2 to 5. Therefore, the application seeking leave to appeal stands rejected. The original record and proceedings be sent back to the concerned court. [ S. S. SHINDE, J. ] bsb/Feb.11