IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.889 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Vinay Kumar S/o Kamal Singh R/o House No.45, PS Badarpur Mithapur, New Delhi ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No.432/2010, U/s 420/467/468/471 IPC, PS Rudrapur, Distt. US Nagar Dated: October 5, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. MK Ray, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant was the servant of the complainant and as there was a dispute of salary between the complainant and the applicant, and the applicant was not paid the salary by the complainant, but when the dispute arose, this FIR was lodged by the complainant against the applicant, however the applicant is not at all connected with the Bharat Oil Gas Corporation Ltd. Further, the applicant is neither the distributor nor the owner nor he is at all beneficiary for the distribution of Gas. Lastly, he is in jail since last more than one month and the trial has yet not been started and he has got no previous criminal history. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, US Nagar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) October 5, 2010 Rajeev Dang