1N THE HIGH COURI‘ OF CHHAIVI‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2555 of2002 Chumman Lal Sahu, Son of Late Shn' Petitioner Jagdish Sahu Shitalapara, Opposite Gautam Kirana, Behind Haxihar $chooi, Nawapara Rajim Distn'ct — Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. ,3«w»a-M M State of Chhattisgarh, through the Chief Secretaly, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. General Administration Department through the Secretary State of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education O$cer, Raipur (C.G.) 4. 3. The Collector (Financial Branch), Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Shn‘mati Ramknmari Sahu Daughter of Shri itwarimm Sahu Village Lawan Post ~— Lawan Via — Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ‘ CONSTYIUTION OF INDIA (SB: Honie Shri Satish K. Agnihotii J.) ’b Shn' Pankaj Aganval, Advocate for the peoner. Shii Vinay Hari Deputy Advocate General with Shri Vivek Shanna, Panel Lawyer for te respondents. (assed on this 8th Da of September, 2008) 1. With the consent of lerned counsel appearing or the parties a f the matter is heani finally. 2. Learned counsel appe for the petitioner sumits that the aring b petitoner oes not Want o press this petition on merits, at i d t ths stage. However, he seeks persion o me a H i mis t ak representation efore the concerne authority and the b d concerned authorty may e irect to consider and decide‘ i b ded uu t. h O R D E R P y the same, in accordance with law, 011 its own merits, within the prescribcd time. Shri Vinay Halit, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the respondents] State submits that the representaubn, if any, shall. be considered and decided by the concemed authority, in accoxdance with law, on its own merits, within a ‘ period of four weeks from the date of redéiiit of the representation. 1n View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. di- . in ‘ Satish K.A ‘ Ju‘ig o