IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38458 of 2009 1. SURENDRA PRASAD GUPTA 2. VIJAY PRASAD GUPTA 3. SUNIL KUMAR 4. ANIL KUMAR 5. RAJENDRA PRASAD 6. YOGENDRA PRASAD 7. DILIP KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 19.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a complaint case under Section 468 of the Penal Code is that the complaint itself acknowledges that the lands were joint properties allegedly partitioned, the parties were related and considering all of which certain other co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 15573 of 2009 inter alia noticing the civil nature of the dispute. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mrs. Priti Verma, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jehanabad in Complaint case No. 879 of 2008. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)