1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3031 OF 2010 Sau.Sarla w/o Jitendra Chaudhary Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.D.N.Suryawanshi, advocate holding for Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi, advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 06th April, 2010. P.C.: 1 Petitioner is raising exception to the order passed by Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, whereby appeal presented by petitioner challenging the order passed by Additional Collector, Jalgaon, came to be dismissed. 2 Petitioner was functioning as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Warkhedi. The motion of no confidence was moved against petitioner by seven members of village panchayat and requisition to that effect was tendered on 07.11.2009. The Tahsildar, on receipt of requisition, convened the meeting of village panchayat for consideration of motion of no confidence on 13.11.2009 and after following due procedure, the motion of no confidence was carried by the members of village panchayat with overwhelming majority of seven members out of total nine members supporting the motion. The motion adopted was subject matter of challenge in the appeal presented to the Additional Collector, Jalgaon. However, 2 Additional Collector, on consideration of the case put up by petitioner, was pleased to dismiss same on 15.11.2009. The order passed by Additional Collector, dismissing the appeal, has been confirmed by Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division, in appeal. 3 I have perused both the orders passed by appellate authorities. There is no procedural irregularity while adopting motion of no confidence moved against petitioner. In fact, there is no ground for causing interference in the orders passed by the authorities below. Petitioner has lost confidence of majority and as such was required to walk out. No interference is required to be caused. 4 Petition stands dismissed. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* adb/wp303110