f? HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (DIVISION BENCHl CORAM : Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Misc. ADD&ai No.658 OF 2005 Versus RESPONDENTS 2. 5. 6. Ramawtar Suryawanshi, aged about 16 years (Minor), s/o Bhagwandeen Suryawanshi, through - natura! guardian father Shri Bhagwandeen Suryawanshi resident of viilage Telsara, P.S. Chakarbhatha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt. Alimunnissa, agsd about 40 years, wife of Shri Seikh Azeej, resident of Mungeli Road, Vikas Nagar, Bilaspur, Distt, Bilaspur (C.G.) Narayan Das Satnami, aged about 24 years, son of Shri Mahetar Ram Satnami, resident of Jogipur, P.S. Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) The Oriental Insurance Company, through Branch Manager, Divisional Office, Medteal College Road, Beema Manjil, Kachahri Chowk, Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Tekchand Makija, aged about 50 years, son ofShri Moolchand Makija, resident of Chakarbhatha Camp, Chakarbhatha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Bachchamal alias Mohanlal aged about 40 years, son of Shri Sawandas sindhi, resident oflWard No. 15, ChakarbhathaCamp, Chakarbhatha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) The Oriental Insurance Co. Limfted, through - Branch ; Manager, Branch Office, In front of High Court of Chhattisgarh, I Biiaspur (C.G.) i i i.i.Ss t <7 -2.- Present: Mr.P.P. Sahu, leamed counsel for the appeltant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 7'" of December 2005) The foilowing Order of the Court was passed by S.R. Nayak, CJ: In a personal injury case, the injured - claimant not being satisfied with the compensation awarded by the MACT, has preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1:988. The appellant - ctaimant aileging that he sustained head injury in (he accident, claimed compensation of Rs. 11 ,40,000/-. In the ciaim application nor in the evidence, the specific injuries sustained by the appellant are not disclosed. The doctor who treated the appellant was also not examined. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to show that the appeliant sustained any injury. He atso did not produce any medical bitls nor wound certificate. In the cireumstance and in the absence of legal evidence, the Tribunat taking sympathy on the appellant has awarded a sum of Rs. 5,000/- as a token compensation. Even beforethis Court, no materials are placed before us to show that the appellant sustained any serious injuries or spent any money towards medical treatment. There is no merit in the appeal. Hence, it is dismissed. r~ sd/- 1 satish K. Agnihotri Sd/- Chief Jiistice Judge 1^'A