3 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH^OURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS ^ ..•<" ^/^/ tl^ .<fl*'/' -••'" ^y ,^<%/ .«*' ^^%^ ^w ^y y?- W.P.(S)NO. ^,U ^, /2010 1. Smt Savita Sinha, W/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Sinha, aged about 39 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D., Gayn Jyoti Naveen Primary School, DarbaritoU, Block-Jashpur, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) 2. . Sudheshwar Rani Chouhan, S/o Late Shri Palan Ram Chouhan, aged about 39 years, working as Head Master, T.W.D., Govt. Primary School, Harradipa , Block-Bagicha, Distt- Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1: State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secrctary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ Assistant Corumissioner, Tribal Welfare Departnient, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 3 Block Education Officer, Block - Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ Block Education OfEcer, Block - Bagicha Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) g Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 7=T •<<]<<ICI<4, EiiTily'lla, Mrtl^y ?®M...^.^.^ sn^i'qnf^R; dan 311^1 •a^m / ?wiw ^to sii^r SB : Hon'bie Shri Maninura Moh 21-07-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsi Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panei Heard. Learned counsei appearinj petitioners are entitled to benefit c they having passed B.T.i. examin^ cost. is submitted that the issue 'ii res integia and the same has bee Court in the case of Asha Saxena ^! for the petitioneri. S-awyer for the State/respondents. for the petitioners submits that the if two advance increments on account of tion before their appointment at their own livolved in the present petition Is no ionger finaliy decided by the Hon'bie Supreme li/s. Siate ofm.P. a Ore.. 2003 (SW MPJR fSCi 59. It is further subrnitted that th| order dated 06-02-2009 passed counsel for the petitjoners further << 29-04-2010 passed in Vv'rit Appeal judgment of the Supreme Court in order D'assed by this Court in have been issued for considerati< incremenis as per cire'uiar dated 3 Pradesh, after verification ofthefaet Learned counsei for t'ne petitioner wouid aiso be considere(( CM<l[<n4lTT +ii^C111 ^f 'fe'^t <[^l't^l< ^sifman^i h Shrivastava. .j. anbther |s Court has aiso taken a similar view in Its |in Vv.P.(S) Nu.6257 of 2008. Learned rav/s attention of this Court tu order dated No.124 of 2009, vi/herein reiying upon the me case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the Writ Appeai No.87/2009, directions >n of the case for grant of two advancs 1-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya ts pleaded in the petition. respondents subrnits that case of the on the sarne iines. ;>jRi^ »- -<''•••' '*" f".-'";* !;k^.. 3 o /!' 'XI-HC—78 7^ "41'41<rl'4, yfll^'is, f^OI'Hy ...lQf.^.)Ai>.:..^e..^..^J^ •3TI^T1T^T (' 3n^l qil R.iicji gqrsn^ignw <.- TCTW^feiSlI^l in view of the statement off with a direction to the respoi ciairn of the petitioners for gran dated 21-09-1974 issued bythe the facts pieaded in the petition v '??F?f?TzfhT tnFFff ^f fSTSt ^l^R ^SfRtHOT^T ^nade above, this petition is finaliy disposed ident authorities to consider and decide the of two advance increments as per circular ptate of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of j'ithin a period of eight weeks from today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge