IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2008 / 17TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22809 of 2008(M) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ---------------------- T.P. ANIL KUMAR, PEEDIKAPARAMBIL, KANJIRAMATTOM, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT: ----------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.22809/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT The controversy in this writ petition has arisen out of a request made by the petitioner for revision of timings of his own service. His request was rejected and it was challenged before the STAT in MVARP No.51/2008. The revision was disposed of by Ext.P4 order, setting aside the order of the Secretary and remanding the matter for fresh consideration. It is complained that, although the timing conferences were scheduled on 19.4.2008 and 25.7.2008, it was again adjourned. Complaining of delay in implementing Ext.P4 this writ petition is filed. 2. A reading of Ext.P4 shows that, the order was passed on 25.2.2008. Since inordinate delay has already been caused, I see no justification to decline the prayer of 2 the petitioner for expeditious convening of timing conference. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondents shall convene a timing conference consequent to Ext.P4, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production f a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3