IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15071 of 2009 1. RAVI SHASTRI S/O RAJ BANSHI PRASAD R/O VILL.- RAJAPUR, AHIRWALIA, P.S. KOTWA, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN, MOTIHARI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE EAST CHAMPARAN 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK- KOTWA DISTT.- MOTIHARI 4. THE SARPANCH, PUNCHAYAT RAJ, AHIRWALIA BLOCK- KOTWA, MOTIHARI 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PUNCHAYAT RAJ, AHIRWALIA BLOCK- KOTWA, DISTT.- MOTIHARI 6. MUKESH KUMAR S/O MUNILAL R/O VILL.- AHIRWALIA, P.S. KOTWA, DISTT.- MOTIHARI ----------- 2. 25.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the nature of the order proposed, this Court does not consider it necessary at this stage to issue notice to respondent no. 6 as his interests are sought to be protected adequately. The issue relates to appointment on the post of Secretary, Gram Kachari in Panchayat Raj, Ahirwalia, Block- Kotwa, District- Motihari. At Annexure-3 to the writ application is an order dated 18.6.2009 of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Motihari. The proceeding appears to have been initiated at the behest of the petitioner. The order is speaking and reasoned disclosing full application of mind supported by materials to record a finding that the petitioner had been wronged and that he was fit to be appointed after removing any person but may have been 2 illegally appointed. If the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Motihari has not been upset by a superior administrative authority or a competent Court of law at the behest of respondent no. 6, or otherwise, this Court directs respondent no. 2 to ensure that the order dated 18.6.2009 is forthwith implemented in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed with aforesaid direction. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)