:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Application No.684 of 2007 Tanuja Uttam Kothmire. ..Applicant. Vs. Sangita Ramesh Rungar and ors. ..Respondents. Mrs. Sonia Miskin i/by Mr. Piyush Shah for the Applicant. Smt.A.A.More, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 9th July, 2008 PC : 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. On perusing the judgment and order, I find that cogent reasons are given. It was the case of the accused that blank cheques were given. It is an admitted position that the respondent No.1 has filled the amount and date of the cheque. It is sought to be contended that this is permitted. However, there is further finding of the trial court that there is nothing to show advancement of the loan to the extent of the amount which is entered in the cheque. Apart from the bare words of the complainant there is nothing to show that an amount of Rs.80,000/- as put in the cheque by the complainant was actually advanced. In the circumstances, not a fit case to interfere in the appeal against the order of acquittal. Hence, leaved refused. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)