IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.246 of 2011 CHANDESHWAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 06.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after the decree in the Title Suit No. 136 of 1997 and on getting the delivery of possession through the execution case filed by the petitioner, even then the person against whom the decree was passed have again entered into the land of the petitioner by committing the offence of criminal trespass. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police is not taking any action in the matter. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner has grievance that the information given to the police constitutes offence and the case is not being registered it was open for the petitioner to file a complaint as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Considering the submissions of the parties, in case any one has taken the possession of the land of the petitioner, the petitioner either to take the recourse of law under the civil law or initiate a criminal proceeding, but for the aforesaid grievance the writ application cannot be entertained. The writ application accordingly stands dismissed. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)