 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO: 3763/2008 (Shrikant Karnase vs. Union of India and others) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: D.D.SINHA & A. P. BHANGALE , JJ. DATED: 11th February, 2009. *** 1. Heard Mr S K Sable, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr S K Mishra, learned Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent. 2. Considered the contention canvassed by the respective counsel. In the instant matter, it is not in dispute that the services of the petitioner came to be dispensed with in view of the overstay. Though the counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner could not join the duties on account of illness, however, in our view, considering the nature of duties the petitioner was required to perform, the action taken by the respondents cannot be said to be bad in law. 3. No case is made out for showing indulgence. Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE sahare