Q 3J \ ' Wm Hizoo 6mm (113W) :"fmm at ‘ m “F“m WW§WW a: mum 1 : I ’ g WRIT ?ETIT10NER ‘ ,7, PETITIONI ' } NO. 1819 OF 2008 Sanjita $5uman D/o. i E 'iheq‘nwm Qinha agu'i about 1 Rm Qu No 411, sneet— :Hnsmta1 (Rertol Rh_$n Dmfrmfl‘ DLug ‘CQ [ i WRSU‘; 1 PwSPermEm g 1. E i i i x ‘ State of Chhattisgm‘h, Through — the Secretary, Departm6nt 0f Schocl Educatien ’, DKS Bhawan, Raipul (Chhattisgarm g } 2. ‘[ ‘i { i ’ I Dimctor, Chhatthgarh Sta i Cmmcii far F‘dnm‘non l Research 311d T1 aumlg, i Shailendra Nagar, Raipur (CG)J § 1; ! i 3. E i E Pt. Ravi Shanker Shukla ‘ Unive1sitv, Raipur, Through its ' KeglStrar Pt Pam SnanKar Shukla TTImIers1tV, Palpm CG) ; E 4. i : g ! 1 ‘1 ; i ‘1 g Lhhatusgarh Preresswllal Examination Board—Through its Chairman, Cilhattisgarh, Prafcssional xa-minatien Board C/ 168 Tagore Nagar, Ralpur (CG) i ’ ‘ 5 i l 5. § i’ ‘ C‘hanehyam Qmgh Ania Gnh Cullege Thlough its Punmpal‘ Gq Arya G1r1s (‘QLFUP Hu1£r£ 1&1), Present: Mr. RP. Sahu, Advocate ¥ for the petitioner. 1' ¥\"’\\V7 /r 3W émw m.W Ate/197i3/zoox 40,000. WW,§%1W g‘, @ W ...;.§.)&/.0‘mzoo g mmm gamma: Wmm y wwwiiwm maxim vocate General with Mr. Arun Sao, L L 1&L6. Advocate The question involved ir who belongs to Other Backu studies in B.Ed. course in the been admitted 1'11 the said cou tithe common entrance exe Council for Education Resean through Chhattisgarh Profess was allowed relaxation of 5% the prequalifieation examinai Ravi Shankar Silukla Univer: has refused to issue admiss ground that her admission relaxation of 5% is illegal. a: marks in the graduation (H‘ v entitled for reiaxation. Mr. Vinay Harit, Dy. Ad Govt. Advocate far th€ S Pandey . Mr. Vjnay N0. 2 / University. for respendant nu‘u nnfa‘l I‘m vL‘nJ on 8.4.2008! {Passed Per Dhig’andra Mishra. J: Heard. this petition is that the petitioner, ‘ard Classes and is pursuing her respondent No.5—College. She has rse after successfully participating mination conducted by the State :h and Training (for short ‘SCERT? ional Examination Board and she n the minimum marks required in 'ion. However, the respondent—Pt. fity, Raipur (for short ‘University’l L .on card to the petitioner on the to the above course by allowing . she has secured less than 50% onors) and therefore, she is not \ 3mme: data gamma, mama ~Fsn97—3/2008 ammo. 311%!m (13W) @9 W emsm (Wu) ‘( Wmm / mm fs¢m ' $aima11é¥l W Learned counsel for t1 obi ection of respondent—U No.7232/07 between Som‘ R; C;G. & others alid other con‘ i ibv this Court vide order date in terms of the above order. This petition may also be disposed fact has not been disputed by learned counsel for the resoondente iated 28.3.2008 passed in Writ en Soni Rakhi Bek and others Vs. instant petition is allowed and the order dated 17‘012008 (Anne xnre P—lO) passed by respondent— Pt, Ravi Shankar Shukla Uni 111 View of the order Petition {C} No7232/07 betwe Stare of (LG, and others, the Le petitioner submit that similar [Ci xkhi Bek and others Vs. State of lected petitions has been decided d 28.8.2008 and prayed that this riversitv in Writ Petition Jersity, Raipur is hereby quashed and the respondent— Pt, Ravi Shankar Shukla University, Raipnr is directed to enroll the petitioner as student of BEd. course in the college affiliated to it and issue her eligibility certifieate for appearing in the examination. No order as costs. \M. .v/> Sd/- Dhirendra Mish‘lh ' Judge mmwf@);9/§é€%o 3 W ’1 W WW, W wirS/ma/zoos intone.