T6 J+ 'T %. 22.07.20rO Present: Mr. K.P. Singh, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the state with ASI Beer Singh, P.S. Kalkaji. Mr. Rajesh Vashisht, Adv. for the complainant with complainant in Person. +Crl. M.C. No.2317 /2O1O 1. Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married on 8th M.y, 2OO2 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 are relatives of petitioner No. 1. Due to temperamental differences petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately since 28tt'April, 2005. 2. On the complaint of respondent No. 2 FIR No. IOIT l2OO5 und"er sections 4g8Ll406l34 IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry prohibition Act was registered at police station Kafkaji. Parties have amicably settled their disputes and have decided to part ways. They have obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge, Delhi on 26th March, 2oIo. Settlement amount has already been paid to the respondent No. 2 by petitioner No. 1. o Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified r )/ 3. Keeping in mind the above facts, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. In the larger interest I quash FIR No. IOIT l2OO5 under sections 498A1406134 IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered at police station Kalkaji and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. 4. Petition is disposed of in the above terms' 5. Dasti. A-'^J **:> A.K. PATHAK, J. July 22,?OLO rb , I