IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2011 of 2008 Bachchu Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 11 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna stating therein to the effect that the order of the Court has been complied with, and as such, the contempt application deserves to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although payments have been made, however, interest has not been paid on account of the delayed payments as also the direction to consider the entitlement of the petitioner for the grant of Assured Career Progression has also not been considered. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that on perusal of paragraph 7 of the show cause it appears that the benefit of Assured Career Progression is not available to Teachers and as such the petitioner since retired as a Teacher the benefit of the same is not admissible. However, the petitioner has not been communicated with any such order. Considering the submissions of the parties, the show cause and the supplementary show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter and the application accordingly stands disposed of. However, the concerned District Programme Officer shall communicate the petitioner with regard to his disentitlement for grant of Assured Career Progression. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)