gaS^ /^ ^ CRP, g^l^g HI6H COURT OF CHH^m:S6^RH AT MU^SPUR Criminai Rcvjston R) No.52$$ of 2008 ^pplicant Budhe^hwar Ram Sw of Somara ftam, aged about 38 yews, Occypation $ovt. Teacher, Pnmary School, Bhd^amynda, Tahsil Pei!., bistrict Surguja (C.6.) Versisi ResDorHJent Smt, &jshma Devi W/o. Budhe^hwar Ram, aged abait 32 ywirs, ft/o. Mohulla-behind Mis^Son Hospital, AmbjkQpur, P.S* and Tah. Ambikapur, District Surguja (C^) (REVISION UNDER SECTtON 19(4) OF THE FAAAILY COURTS ACT, 1984) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharm®,J.) Shri SO.Singh, counsel forthe appticant, ORAL ©R&ER 0>ossed on 10th December. 2<%®) Heard on I.A.No<01/2008, q3p(icGtjon for condonation of detay jn fiiing the revision as the same has been preferred with a delay of 44 dcy^* For the reasons mentioned Jn the appHcfftion, it i^ Gltewed. &eJ€y ?n fjllng the revj^ion is hereby condoned. Al^o heard on admission^ This revision petition i^ dlrected c^dnst the order dcEted 1&9.2(X^ pas^ed by the Judge, Family Court-, Ambjkopur, in MJC No.10/2007 wheTOby the learned Judge, Fcroily Court has altered the amoimt of cmount fromRs. 60Q/- to Rs. 1200/- p®rmonth to the re<^ondent. The order is challenged on the ground that without tlwre being cogent and gufficient reQson, the court' below ha^? enhesnced the mairrt'enan^e amount and thereby committed <m jdegaljty, Leamed counsel for the applicant submit^ that In case of alterotion of maintenance amount the re^pondent is required to adduce cogent and relmble evjdence to the effect thot there 15 sijbstantjcxl change in cjrcum^tances B/- -2- after passin9 of the first order of maintenance, birt' the respondent has fdled to adduce my evidence to this effect* Aft-er pas^ing of the flrst order of maintenmce/ there is substoffrt-ial chm9e In circum^tances, I have heard learned counsel for the applicmt ond perused 1+?e ordar impt^necl. It i^ reve^xled from peru^al of tte order impugned that Rs. 600A per month was awarded to the respondent on the qiplicat'ion filed in the year 1999. The court below has arrived oft- a finding thcrt- after pcssin9 of the flrst order of maintenance there i^ substontia! increa^ In the deame^^ md increase cosfr of the art-jcles^ The cour^ betow has awarded the maintBnance of Rs.1200/- instead of Rs. 600A. Taking into con^iderotion the present cost of tjylng, I do not firKl any jllegaljty or infirmity <n the order impugned, Consequently, the revision pBtttJon belng devotd of merit is tiaMe to be dismissed and it i^s hereby dismi^sed at the stage of admtesion. In view of above, I.A.No.02/2008 stwds disposed of. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge