IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE fCIVIU N0. ll^ /^O^) ^oh fARISING OUT OF W.P. fPIU N0. 2437/2007) DISPOSED OFF ON 10^.0.2007 ^ PETITIONER ^e:^ ...-s:§%: ^•••;'^^^<K"^ ^•^"•" t^.-' \^"" ...-•^ Bajrang Lal Sen, S/o. Shri Ganpat Ram Sen, aged about : 45 years, R/o. Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). RESPONDENTS / •* CONTEMNOR VERSUS , ^ ~^- (?. fi^L •^^(0 1. State—of—Chhattisgarh, V=H=eygh The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. 2. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). . fc. s^^-r^ )<u^w- -o<^t^J- T^l^ Collector, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.). . ^ _ ^ l^14 ^r'y^nA S-^w^. Sub Divisional Officer, s (Revenue) Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). , ^ ^. ^. yn^k^^JL*^^- Tahsildar Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). ^ ^ 50^^12A«-^ ^e^SI^ 5. Tb^—Nagar —-Panchayat ScU'nipali, t-hmiigh. ^4ts Chief f^^^^^4~ Municipal Officer/^ Saraipali, /^ District (C.G.). Mahasamund PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 2F5 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 .^ -HC-22 3:n^T'^T RTijcb STI^T ^h^i^ ^f^a IIINN^" Deepii -^^ ^TPT^PT, "^"^FT^. f^Tray 'WR^T'^Rra^ i17^T CW-> &t0€ (<^)^-^''^, 200 'f^^ST' -3H^T-^TT^R-^rftcT SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohail 05-04-2011 Shri Pushpendra Kumar Pate) Learned counsei for the 10/10/07 passed in W.P.(PIL) N< informed the Court that in case|, Government property, steps wouid fct is removed. Learned counsel for the representation to the respondent N4 there are certain encroachments. C other respondents aiso but the re^i removai of encroachmerit. The petition was finaily d| ^overnment Advocate. It was state<{i ^teps wouid be taken. in the absence of there beirt with regard to any encroachment, present contempt petition. The petition is therefore dismjssed |, counsei for the petitioner. p^titioner submits that vide order dated jo.2437/07, the Government Advocate there is any encroachment on the te taken to ensure that the encroachment <=hl^f<n4lr1 'RT^ff ^ f^Tst <P31^K ^ <3Tf^Rv?TT^T Shrivastava. J. pet|:ioner submits that the petitioner sent a .1 after the order of the Court stating that popy of representation was given to the jpondents have not taken any steps for fsposed off on the statement of the ate<{i that in case, there is any encroachment, |g any decision by any competent forum am not inciined to issue notice in the Sd/- Manindra MohanShrivastava Judge [TN?^i:^