1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7226 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7226 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7226 OF 2005 Shri Subhash Ramchandra Durape : Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Mr.P.P.Hudlikar with Mr.U.R.Agandsurve for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7279 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7279 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7279 OF 2005 Devanand S. Swami : Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Mr.V.V.Purvant for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7650 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7650 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7650 OF 2005 Shrimant Basappa Mehtre : Applicant versus 2 2 2 The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Mr.P.P.Hudlikar with Mr.U.R.Agandsurve for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7746 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7746 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7746 OF 2005 Arjun Birajdar : Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Mr.V.V.Purwant applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7769 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7769 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7769 OF 2005 Sahebrao Hiraman Sattesa : Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Mr.P.P.Hudlikar with Mr.U.R.Agandsurve for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. 3 3 3 CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. DATED : 30th January 2006. DATED : 30th January 2006. DATED : 30th January 2006. COMMON P.C. COMMON P.C. COMMON P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants, on instructions, seek permission to withdraw these applications with liberty to approach appropriate court. The applicants are granted liberty to apply before the appropriate court. If the application for bail is made before the appropriate court, the said application shall be considered and decided expeditiously. With these directions, the applications are allowed to be withdrawn. The interim orders granted by this Court to stand vacated from Monday 06th February 2006. The applicants shall give prior notice of the application to the Investigating Officer and shall surrender before the competent Court. The trial Coiurt shall not construe witndrawal of the anticipatory bail as a rejection of the application on merits. 4 4 4 [V.M.KANADE,J] [V.M.KANADE,J] [V.M.KANADE,J]