1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.APPA 90 OF 2010. SMT. MADHU RAKESH JAIN VS SHRI RISHIRAJ RAKESH JAIN AND ONES ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. M. Bhangde Advocate for applicant. Shri A. A. Sambray, Advocate for respondent no.1. Shri D. B. Yengal, APP for State respondent no.2. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 22 nd JULY, 2010. Heard. Perused impugned order and evidence of the parties tendered by learned Advocate for the applicant. The finding that the accused has succeeded in rebutting the presumption of consideration behind the cheque, is based on appreciation of evidence. Finding is not shown to be perverse. Application and appeal have no merit and are dismissed. Judge //mule//