IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1610 of 2008 Between: Yeruva Pratap Reddy S/o Inna Reddy r/o Renta Chintala Village & Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur. 2 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gurazala, Guntur District. 3 The Station House Officer, Rentachintala Village & mandal, Guntur District. 4 The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 5 The Grampanchayt, Rentachintala Village & mandal, Guntur District rep by its Panchayat Secretary. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SARVOTHAM REDDY ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting the village Committee not to conduct reasonable weight pulling test schedule to be held at Rentachintala Village & Mandal, Guntur as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in conducting bullock Competition schedule to be held in the first week of February 2008.” At the hearing, Sri B.Sarvotham Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.1994 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st JUNE, 2009. kvni