1 S.B.Cr. Revision Petition No.04/2007 (Nawal Singh vs. Smt. Daku Bai) Date of order : August 17, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Pradeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.Vishasl Raj Mehta, P.P. for the State. Mr.S.K.Mathur, for the respondent. The petitioner has challenged the order dt. 28.11.2006 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Udaipur (for short `the family court' hereinafter), whereby the family court granted monthly allowance of maintenance at the rate of Rs.800/- per month in favour of respondent and against the petitioner. It has not been disputed by the petitioner that the respondent is his legally wedded wife. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the order impugned. In my view, the family court was justified in granting the monthly allowance of maintenance at the rate of Rs.800/- per month, which in any manner cannot be said to be excessive as a sum of Rs.800/- is hardly an amount to maintain an adult person and, therefore, I do not 2 find any error, illegality or perversity in the order impugned warranting interference in the revisional jurisdiction. The revision petition stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-