Crl. Misc. No. M-32112 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-32112 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 4, 2011 Ramesh Yadav …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Bipan Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anju Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Sushma Chopra, Addl.A.G., Haryana. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner has been in custody w.e.f. September 15, 2011 on the allegations that he alongwith his co-accused Madan Singh and Joginderpal had prepared fake documents and bills to sell liquor in Rajasthan which was meant to be sold in Chandigarh. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, it is sufficient to observe that the petitioner has been involved in the case on the basis of confessional statements made by co-accused Madan Singh and Crl. Misc. No. M-32112 of 2011 [2] Joginderpal. The admissibility and relevance of the statements of accomplice would be a debatable issue during trial, in case it is not corroborate by other evidence. Taking into consideration the fact that the recoveries have already been effected, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate subject to an additional condition that the petitioner will not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of during the pendency of the trial. November 4, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE