RFMi':;!- C--^ -lcTCS.J IN HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUft WRIT PETITION (c) N0, ^^^ 1 OF 2009 PETITIONER Vs RESPONDENTS ^'yy^ 6-^^<x ^.•1\"^\?\.^:" ..^{/^\y~k' ?••" ^\^.>"' ^ >••' ^>~- / 'A !^^^ ^T*w^\, J^a^i Vijay Kumar Burinan, son of Shri Du ieram Burman, aaed 30 vears. Occuoation- Aariculturist, resident of Villaqe Parsada, Tehsil Jaijaipur, Oistrict Janjair- Champa (C6) ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, throuoh the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat A Rural bevetopment, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raiour. 2. The Director, Panchayat A Rural DeyeloBment DeDartment, State of Chhattisadrh, Mantralay, ^JQX.S. Bhawun. Raipur. 3. The Collector, District /Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. DeDutv Director, Panchayat & Social Welfare Development, Chamoai, District Janjqir- Chamoa (C6). 5. State Election Commission, throuqh its Secretury, Raipur. 6. Sarpanch, 6ram Panchaynt Parsada, Tehsil Jaijaipur, District Janjair-Champa (C6) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN&IA !??f'"y\ ii;! ^? Petitioner HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. 6651 of2009 Vijay Kumar Burman Versus Resoondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri V.C. Ottalwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Arun 2. 3. 4. (Passed on 1st day ofJuly, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on Instructions, submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous. On objection from other side. It is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as having beeome infructuous. II 1 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge j i -Jfc