1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 573 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 573 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 573 OF 2006 Jagatrao K. Bhoi ... Petitioner Versus Education Inspector & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Sunil Dighe for Petitioner. Ms. I.C. Calcuttawala, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 DATED : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C. . Considering the controversy, the petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions : . It is the case of the Petitioner that she has not been paid for a period when she was declared surplus, however, according to Law, she is entitled to the same. If that be the case, the Petitioner to make representation to Respondent No. 1 within two weeks from today. On such representation being made, Respondent No. 1 after hearing the Petitioner and all other interested parties to pass appropriate orders according to Law within eight weeks thereafter. With the above observation, Petition disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)