IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No.....fc[r^'.........2011 PETITIONER :y^^}^ v-'~ . ••••" SPONDENTS Ishwar Singh Thakur S/o Shri Anjor Singh Thakur aged 50 years, Head Mater Government Primary School Tumdipar Saja District Durg ( C.G.) VERSUS The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Bemetara District Durg ( C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDlMt ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR (1) MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, PETETIQNER Writ Petitiori fSl No. 6133 of 2011 Ishwar Singh Thakur RESPONDEN15 State another of Chhattisgarh and Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for the State ff °¥*kS^1*1% Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition the petitioner was appointed as Assistant teacher on pay of Rs. 4,000 and after successfully probation period, he was granted regular pay scale. 2. Contention of the learned counsel for that he is entitled for regular pay scale wit date of initiat appointmentand his case is with number of decisions passed by this judgment rendered by the M.P. State a fixed the the petitioner is 1 effect from the and also the Trlbunal, Others Vs. State held that similarly scale from the date of M.P. tt Otliers) placed teachers sd for the parties that the matter Apex Court bu< 3. It is not disputed by both was taken up by the State to was also dismissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the teachers/Assistant -•2.- teachers are entitled for regi their initial appointment, 4. in view of the above submission made by the counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, in the light of the aforesaid judgment and the circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P-6) and jn turn, the concerned respondent is directed to consider his case on its own merits and in its perspective. If the petitioner stands on the same footing as per order passed by the State Administrative Tribunal In Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently conflrmed by the Supreme Court in Spedal Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 by order dated 03.01.95, the petitioner may be entitled to sama relief accordingly. it is expected from the State authorities to pass suitable order after due scrutiny of the facts. 6. It is made ctear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly jn accordance with law. — -——~~___ Sd/- . - Pritinker Diwaker ^ ' .Judge