IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 26TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 20692 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MELEPEEDIYEKKAL MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.THEKERAKATH MOHAMMED,KATTIPARUTHI AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADVS. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE C.I.OF POLICE, TIRUR, 3. THE S.I.OF POLICE, TIRUR. 4. POOLAKKAL NABEESABI, D/O.MOHAMMED, THALAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, KATTACHIRA, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM. 5. ABDUL KHADER, S/O.MAYINKANAKATH SEETHI MASTER, THALAKKAD AMSOM DESOM, KATTACHIRA, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR FOR R5 SMT.G.VANITHA FOR R5 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.K.VIPINDAS R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)NO. 20692/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True copy of the order in I.A. No.1904/2002 in the final application dated 24.06.2006. Ext.P2: True copy of the petition in E.P. No. 153/2007 dated 9.07.2007. Ext.P3: True copy of the application to break open the lock dated 26.03.2009. Ext.P4: True copy of the application dated 26.03.2009. Ext.P5: True copy of the notes of delivery dated 09.06.2009. Ext.P6: True copy of the deliver account dated 09.06.2009. Ext.P7: True copy of the I.A. 145/2009 in E.P. No.135/2009, Munsiff Court, Tirur dated 9.6.09. Ext.P8: True copy of the counter dated 11.06.2009 to Ext.P7. Ext.P9: True copy of the complaint dated 14.07.2009 before the S.I. of police. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 20692 OF 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this Court praying for a direction to the police to afford protection for enjoyment of his property. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that at present, there is no interference by the party respondents. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of making it clear that in the unlikely event of any interference by the party respondents or anybody else, it will be open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. (KURIAN JOSEPH) JUDGE (C.T. RAVIKUMAR) JUDGE sp/ 2 KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. W.P.(C)NO.20692/2009 JUDGMENT 17th September, 2009