IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.139 of 2007 TEJA PRASAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 9.09.2009 I.A. No. 5890 of 2007 has been filed for condonation of the delay in preferring the review application. I.A. No. 5891 of 2007 has been filed for impleading one Ravindra Prasad Singh as a petitioner to the review application also on the submission that he was petitioner no. 3 in CWJC No. 6011 of 2004 giving rise to LPA No. 395/2007 and in context of which the present review application arises. The submission is that this was with a view to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties we are satisfied that both the I.A. applications deserve to be allowed. It is accordingly ordered. With the consent of the counsels for the parties the Court has taken up the main review application also for final disposal at this stage. The relief sought in the review application is for a direction for continuance of the petitioners on daily wage till such time till regular appointments are not made by the respondent authorities. The limitation for exercise of review jurisdiction do not permit us to go into that aspect of the matter as it virtually will amount to rewriting the judgement of LPA No. 395 of 2007. If the respondents are not taking steps for fresh regular appointment after the orders of the appellate court, as was urged, and in the changed circumstances, the petitioners seek any fresh or further relief, their remedy lies in moving afresh before this Court. The review application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.) (Jayanandan Singh,J