:9 @ C/gA Law? ‘ §§§Qigif gENg§€ 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAspUR WRIT PETITION I Cr ) No. §%\% 0f 2010 Laan Sahu /o Buddhu Ram ahu, age about 32 years, R/o Kurud Road, Kohka, Thana. Supela, District Durg (CG). Verss u v 1. ,The State of Chattisgarh, through the Secretaly, Home Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG PETITIONER: 2. The DirectOr General of Police, Chhattisgarh, PHQ, Raipur (CG). Th Superintendent of Police, Durg , District Durg (CG). 4. Shri Rakesh ha, City Supertendent of Police, Durg, Dstrict Durg (CG). 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Supela, Bhilai, District Durg (G). 6K’ tation House Offlcer, Police Staon Kumhari, District Durg (CG) 7. Sttion House Officer, Crime Branch, Bhilai, itrict Durg (CG. R ITI E ' O kh S S RESPONDENTS: h ). e “ Btt in i “ C S ti , , . a Ds ) WIT PETON UNDR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIN OF INDIA L HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUB WRIT PETITIQN (Cr) NO. 5818 OF 2010 Lakhan Sahu Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226. of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri K.K. Dewangan, Advocate on behalf of Shri Deepak Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.4. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 16”? day of November, 201 0) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2) No objection from other side. 3) It is ordered, as prayed for. 4) Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihmri Arun: Judge ytL/I"