IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 111 OF 2007 SHRI. VISHRAM KIR PAGUI AND ANR., ... Appellants Versus MR. ULHAS RAM PAGUI (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S AND 23 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. F. M. Reis, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. N.N. Sardessai, Advocate for the Respondents no.1(a), 1(b), 2 to 4, 6 to 24. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 7th August, 2008 P.C. Heard learned Counsel on behalf of the parties. The suit, in which the injunction order has been granted, by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, was filed for setting aside Inventory Proceedings bearing No.29/1996/A which had concluded by Order dated 29.4.1999. There is no finding whatsoever, whether the said inventory proceedings were bad in law as alleged by the plaintiffs for non service of notices on interested parties. That being one of the main ground taken to declare the inventory proceedings null and void. Considering the same, the impugned Order is hereby set aside and the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division is directed to re-hear the matter and decide the application for injunction in accordance with law, by keeping in mind the well known principles which are requried to followed before the grant of injunction. Shri Reis on behalf of the appellants states that till the application for injunction is disposed off on merits, the appellants will not create any third party rights in respect to the suit properties involved in the dispute. The statement is accepted. Parties to appear before the learned Trial Court on 25.08.2008. N. A. BRITTO, J. cg