1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No.233 of 2008 IN Writ Petition No.975 of 2008 [decided] [Sau. Manorabai N. Pawar Vs. Addl. Commr., & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. P.S. Patil, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. O.D. Kakde, AGP for respondent no.1. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. Reserved on : 24th February, 2010. Pronounced on : 05th March, 2010. 1. The Appellant had given a resignation. The resignation was accepted. The acceptance was challenged before the Collector, Divisional Commissioner and before the learned Single Judge. All fora are against the appellant. 2. Heard. 3. In this appeal, the appellant is harping on only one point that the resignation was scribed on a blank paper, which was already signed by the appellant and this aspect is not dealt with by the authorities. 2 4. This Court has scrutinized the papers. This Court has put a question to the appellant as to how the signature of the appellant appeared on notice in a printed format, photo copy of which is at page 24 of the appeal paper- book. 5. Upon perusal, learned Adv., for the appellant has no reply. Learned Adv., is unable to explain as to how the notice of resignation was in a printed format, when the resignation was alleged to be on a blank sheet. 6. Learned Adv., for appellant has no reply to offer. This failure to explain is an answer to the appeal that no interference is called for. 7. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Judge Judge |Hedau|