C^ U 8-z^ ,,^r>if r n»-*t'*tt IN THE HIGH COURT OECHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WJ'. (S) No. ^,& 2-3 /2010 ® PETITIONERS o /.yi ..• ^s-^y ^r.^P'/' \7^y ^sy ^yw ^ .r <y /2. -^ 4. Bhola Prasad Gendre S/o Shri Lahri Das Gendre, Aged about 52 years, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Birkona, Distt.- Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) Murii Singh Thakur S/o Shri Chote Lal Singh Thakur, Aged about 50 years, Govt. Primary School, Newari, Distt.- Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) Smt. Sarojani Shrivastva, W/o Late Praksh Shrivastava Aged about 53years, Govt. Model Girls Higher Secondary School, Kawardha, Distt.- Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) Nandkumar Sharma, S/o Shri Bahal Prasad sharma Aged about Slyears, Govt. Giris Priinaiy School,Sahaspur Lohara, Distt.- Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.). RESPONDENTS '-;• / v%x I * * ?^ 7 Jr-'S 1 ^ c-^7il S h ^ Versus ^ 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through-the Secretaiy, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Distt.- Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) \^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner named above most respectfully submitted as under:- IR{ i^ ::B 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS As shown in the cause title. ^7^ la Prai Etisaarh T PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA 2. Advocate for the petitioners. .Shri A.V. Sridhar, Pane! Lawyer forthe State/res (Passed on 19'" day-of January, 2011) The petitloners were aDPointed as Assistant Te .150/- in the year 1979-80. After compietion of two year's probation, Learned couns' lar pav scaie. •iaittt invoived in the case 1s asto whether the petitioners are entitled to reguiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date The issued invoived, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admlnistrative' Tribunat, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 58 ortiters v. State of M.P. & others), wherein it ws.s held that the simiiariy situated teachers are entitled to reguiar pay .w.e.f. thedate Qfinitiai appointment. The matter was taken uptothe Supreme Court in Specia! Leave Petftion (Civil) No.6892/'93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Gourt uphoiding the decision ^-.^\ E'SSTBS 't '•Sz-^- 'Y.^--^ tllT.—;- "'^sa.sS 6. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitiofters further submits that this Court whiie considering the same issue in Sushil Tiwari & Others v. State Govt. of ChhaWsgarh & Others has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointiy submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court passed in the matter Sushi! T'mari (supra). !n view of the above, the writ petition Is allowed in the same terms. No order asto costs. Sd/-.;'',,. ;. SatishK.AgniSiotn Judge '.'P. (S) No.5976/2006 (decided on 7/11/2006) —£