-1- Civil Revision No.7182 of 2010 (O & M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: January 20, 2011. Civil Revision No.7182 of 2010 (O & M). Neelam and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Raghunath ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The petitioners are aggrieved against the order dated 18.5.2010 passed by the trial Court whereby the application filed by the petitioners, who are legal representatives of Murari Lal (defendant), to file fresh written statement in the suit filed by plaintiff-respondent for specific performance of contract, possession and mandatory injunction in respect of the suit -2- Civil Revision No.7182 of 2010 (O & M). property which had been agreed to be sold by Murari Lal to the plaintiff on 3.12.2002 was dismissed. Defendant Murari Lal (since deceased), now represented his legal representatives (petitioners-defendants), on notice of the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent, appeared in the trial Court and filed written statement and counter claim. Murari Lal died when the case was pending for recording the evidence of the respondent-plaintiff and on an application moved by the petitioners, they were impleaded as defendants. Murari Lal having already filed written statement and the stand of the petitioners cannot be different than the one already taken in the written statement filed by Murari Lal it being a suit for specific performance of agreement allegedly executed between the plaintiff and Murari Lal, the trial Court has rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioners for filing a fresh written statement. Under the circumstances, I do not see any ground which may warrant interference by this Court in the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below. This revision is, accordingly, hereby dismissed being without any merit. ( MOHINDER PAL ) January 20, 2011. JUDGE ak