IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15853 of 2009 1. RAVI KUMAR TIWARI S/O GOVIND JEE TIWARI R/OVILL PIRAUTA, P.S. ARA MUFFASIL, DISTT- BHOJPUR AT ARA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY- CUM- COMMISSIONER (POLICE) OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PATNA 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BHOJPUR AT ARA 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GAYA 6. COMMANDANT, B.M.P. 20, DUMRAO, BUXAR 7. COMMANDANT , B.M.P.14, PHULWARISHARIF, PATNA ----------- 2. 22.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner claims to be an applicant for the post of Constable under advertisement 1 of 2004. This Court finds the writ petition to be speculative in nature. There are no allegations of the marks obtained by the petitioner during selection and whether any person having lesser marks than him has been appointed. There are no allegations with regard to his merit position in the panel and persons lesser qualified in the panel having been appointed etc. Merely because the vacancy may exist, this Court is not persuaded to start a roving enquiry at the request of the petitioner. If the petitioner files a representation making specific disclosure and allegation of arbitrariness and denial of his right to consideration contrary to article 14 of the Constitution of India, only in that event, this Court directs the Respondents to dispose such representation by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of eight weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order along with representation. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)