1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4323 OF 2009 Madhukar Nathu Patil, PETITIONER VERSUS 1. Tapi Parisar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, and others RESPONDENTS Mr.S.R.Barlinge, h/f. Mr.Shrikant Patil, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr.K.B.Chaudhary, learned AGP for respondent no.3 Mr.S.P.Brahme, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and 2 (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 21/08/2009 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India by which the petitioner under suspension in the midst of a departmental inquiry, challenges an order dated 20/05/2009, The affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the respondent management discloses that the respondent management is willing to pay the subsistence allowance in accordance with Law to the petitioner without prejudice to the other contentions which may be available to the respondent management. In the light of that statement therefore 2 Shri.Barlinge, learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent management. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/AUGUST 2009/wp4323-09