IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3067 of 2009 MANOJ YADAV, son of Deep Narayan Yadav, resident of village – Laxmipur, P.S. Gopalpur, District – Bhagalpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23.1.2009 Heard. Renewal prayer has been made in the light of the observations of mine contained in earlier order passed in Cr. Misc. 32927 of 2007 that the petitioner could renew his prayer after examination of the informant. Statement of the informant has been annexed as Annexure 3 indicating that he has been examined. That apart, the attention of the court was drawn to this fact also that the informant did not name the petitioner as his assailant. The informant appears through Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate, to resist the prayer. The court understands the conduct of the informant in not supporting the earlier allegations made by him against the petitioner and expresses its extreme unhappiness on it which simply can be termed as dubious. As regards prayer of the petitioner for bail, regard being had to the conduct of the informant afore discussed 2 as well the observations of mine, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge cum F.T.C. V in Session Trial No. 430 of 2007. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )