ss 2 ss ,;,if:. Ljf^ lQ^/^5 IN THE ST&TE ABMINISTRATIVS TRIBUNAL 01- MP AT JABALPUR O.A. No«to7^ /3.995 APPLIG^NTS 5 ^:.,^ 'f !• Panna Lal Sahu S/o Amrit Lal Sahu Aged about 33 years 2< Hori Lal Sharma S/o Komal prasad Sharma^ Aged about 35 years 3o Xnil Kumar Sahu S/o Parau Ram Sahu Aged about 28 years 4o Bheekham Lal Ratre S/o Shri Jhadoo Ram Ratre^ Aged about 34 years 5o Sonau Ram Sahu S/o Manbodhi Ram Sahu^ Aged about 41 years 6, Atma Ram Gaikwad S/o Hehtar Ram j. Aged atoout 30 years 7< Rakesh Tiwari S/o Tidya Dhar Tiwari, Aged about 28 years 8<. Maniram Markam S/o Rohit Bas Markam^ &ged about 32 years '^^ 9. Pokhan Lal Sahu S/6 Shri VisbnuY^ Bam Sah'u^ - Aged about 33 years^ .? 10, Manrakhan £al Sahu S/o Shri Lallu &am Sahu Aged about 33 years 11 o PaEina Lal ^oni S/o Shri Ram Lal Soni, Aged about 28 years^ t2<» Ramesh Kumar Sah'a S/o Kanhaiya Lal Sahu^ Aged about 29 years^ 13o Nankusbia Sahu S/o Shri Sobnath Sahu^ Aged about 2 7 ye ars 9 14. Sant Ram Thakur si/o Shri Ramnath I'hakur, ^ged about 30 years^ 15 o Nand Kishore Som S/o Shri Ram Ji Thalcur, Aged about 31 year^ -^ -c^- ^ o • -/ * ^^^^^^^ .<^';'^1'?;^,^M^:.:;^'^ ^- ^ :[t^;. ^? 3 a &BSPOND2KTS s I lg» Dinesb Kumar Sahu S/o.-Shri Gopinath Sahu, Aged aboixt 31 years 17o Omkar Sinha S/o Shri Dhruv Kumar Sinha^ Aged about 26 years^ NOo 1 to 17 Care of Geeteshwar Singh Yadu S/o Shri S .K. Yadu, Givi 1 Lines ^ Garviaband Distt. Raipur (MP) -VERSUS- lo State of Madhya Pradesh Throughf the Secretary^ fforest Department^ Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 2e The Px'incipal Chief Conservator of fforest^ Satpura Bhawan^ Bhopal (MP) 3o She Conservator of Forest^ Raipiu: Circle^ Raipur (MP) 4. She Divisional Forest Gfficer, Soutfe £lorest BivisioB^ Raipur Ci^cle^ Raxpur (MP) &ETAIXS OP APPLIC^riON? XI-H^? WRCfT^HT^ 7^F ^i^Kn'4, ^ti1y4i<o, [ci(ni<-i^< ....M:.£:..©....C&.:......1^ 1St200T~ 3TI^?T T(S^K (^y^^f) ^TT^I ^T f<^Jch '<T^T 37T^T $h^Jch •'e.i ^RTTW ^rf^T 3n^?T SB : HON'BLB MR. JUST!CB PRITIlNKER DIWAKER 23.10.2010 Shri Rahul Jha, counsel for t| Shri Vaibha.v G-overdhan, P,L.] This petition was filed bj regularization on the post of Godowi Counsel for the petitioners s^ petition^, most of the petitioners h^ have not been reg^larized from t^|( them. He submits that at this stag^ this petition with liberty to make aj competent a.uthority and in turn th4 decide the same. State counsel has no object| present petition and make any such] Accordingly, the petition is aforesaid liberty. In the eventuality petitioners^ it.is expected from th^ same in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Coit on merits of the ca.se and the a.utho^ity to decide the sam.e strictly in accorc| cr>i4if<n<flti 'WT^rf "^f f^st ^T^K '^3TRm3?^5T le petitioner. for the State. the petitioners claiming their Chowkidar. ibmits that during pendency of the .ve been regularized however, they date which is being claimed by !, he may be permitted to withdraw )propriate representation before the competent authority be directed to ,on if the petitioners withdraw the representation. dismissed as withdrawn with the )f making any representation by the competent authority to decide the irt has not expressed a.ny opinion concerned would be at liberty iance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge