IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.282 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 11.01.2010 Alka Chhabra and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to file any counter reply on behalf of the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek direction to consider their case for promotion as Lecturer (School Cadre) in terms of the revised Government Instructions dated 21.8.2009 (Annexure P-3) read with order dated C.W.P.No .282 of 2010 (O&M) 2 26.8.2009 (Annexure P-5) passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.11574 of 2009 (Sukhdev Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others). The petitioners' case is that they have been deprived of promotion for want of 50% positive results and that the said condition has now been relaxed by the Government of Punjab vide the revised Instructions dated 21.8.2009. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners in terms of the revised Government Instructions dated 21.8.2009 and in case their claim finds favour, they be promoted from the date their juniors were promoted with all consequential benefits. Needful shall be done within a period of 4 months. Disposed of. Dasti. 11-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE