1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.2196 OF 2004 Smt. Netrada Nandkumar Sadwilkar ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. V.C. Ghosalkar for the petitioner. Mr. V.D. Patil for Respondent No.1. Mr. G.W. Mattos for Respondent No.2 - MHADA. Mr. M.A. Wagh, Chairman of Respondent No.3 present. Mr.Rajiv Patil for the added respondents – Applicants. .... CORAM : DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J.& DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J, 6th September, 2004. P.C. 1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer that Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority be directed to decide the eligibility of the petitioner for allotment of flat to him in respondent No.3 Society. 2. The learned counsel appearing for MHADA, on instructions, submits that the question of eligibility of the petitioner would be 2 decided by MHADA within six weeks from today. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for MHADA, nothing further survives in this writ petition. 3. The learned counsel appearing for MHADA undertakes to give hearing to respondent No.4 before deciding the application of the petitioner. We direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to maintain status quo as of today until the decision is taken by MHADA. The order of status quo shall continue for a further period of two weeks after the order is passed by MHADA. We direct MHADA to communicate the order immediately after it is passed. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.