IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8918 of 2011 BACHCHU PASWAN & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 21.06.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the I.P.C. Informant’s daughter Shobha Kumari went missing in the night of 10.01.2011 which was detected on the same day when the F.I.R. was lodged on 14.01.2011. The thrust of accusation is against Ajit Paswan who used to reside with his brother-in-law Bachchu Paswan. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are father and brothers of Ajit Paswan. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the mother and sister of the victim have made specific accusation against Ajit Paswan. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the informant found all the accused persons near the vehicle in the night. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that had the informant found all the accused persons near the vehicle then this fact ought to have been incorporated in the F.I.R. Since the thrust of accusation is against Ajit Paswan who appears to have been assisted by Bachchu 2 Paswan, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner No. 1 namely Bachchu Paswan. The application for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 1 stands rejected. So far as petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are concerned, since there is no specific accusation against them, let the petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 namely Satya Narain Paswan, Sanjeet Paswan, Munna Paswan, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 15 of 2011. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)