IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2147 of 2008 DR. ANWAR MAHMOOD & ORS Versus ANWAR JAMAL & ORS ----------- 2 5.1.2009 Heard Mr. J.P. Shukla, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. This Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the order passed by the lower appellate court affirming the order passed by the trial court rejecting the prayer of injunction. In fact, the scope under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure as against an order rejecting the prayer of injunction is very limited as was held way back by the Apex Court in the case of The Managing Director (MIG) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vrs. Ajit Prasad Tarway reported in AIR 1973 SC 76. Mr. Shukla, however has stressed that the issue is one which is very sensitive and long pendency of the suit will not augur well in the interest of either party. This Court would find that the suit is of the year 2002 in which pleadings have already been completed. That being so, this Court would direct the court below (trial court) to make all possible endeavors to ensure that the suit itself is disposed of within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)