- 1 - (G.C.P.)J 455 (5,00,000)-11.2001) Spl-H.C.,A.S.,C.D.,78e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.609 of 2008 In First Appeal St.No.2631 of 2008 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.P.Manchekar, AGP for State. CORAM: ABHAY S. OKA, J DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard the learned AGP for the Applicant. 2. Perused the earlier order dated 7th February, 2008. The AGP is unable to place on record any material to show that the proposed respondent is the acquiring body. The name of the proposed respondent does not figure either in the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or in the Award under Section 11 of the said Act. Moreover, such a plea was not raised by the applicant during the pendency of the - 2 - reference application before the reference Court. It must be noted here that the reference application was pending from the year 1990 till the year 2007. Hence, there is no case made out for impleading the proposed respondent as a party respondent to the first appeal. Accordingly the application is rejected. JUDGE