IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23346 of 2009 KAUSHAL MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 31.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant was released motorcycle at gun point. First Information Report was lodged against unknown. In course of investigation materials have been collected including the statement of some other witnesses, which implicate the petitioner in the present case. It appears that he also made a confessional statement disclosing many things relating to the present case as well as some other case. Petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2008. It is contended that petitioner was not put on Test Identification Parade. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that impugned order itself reflects the petitioner is accused in several cases of identical nature. Looking to the materials collected in course of investigation as also reflected from the impugned order, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after seven months, if the trial in the mean while is not concluded within aforesaid period commencing from the date of communication of a copy of this order. Uday/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)