IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 23RD MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5056 of 2008(B) ------------------------------------- OS.35/2001 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- K.Y. RASHEED, RESIDING AT FARIS, CIVIL STATION WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE TRADING COMPANY, M.O. WARD, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER K.JOHN MATHEW, PARKLINE HOUSE, M.O. WARD,ALAPPUZHA. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 5056 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of February, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the Subordinate Judge, Alappuzha to postpone the execution proceedings by one year for enabling the petitioner to pay off the decree debt. The learned counsel had produced a copy of the judgment of this Court in WPC 14719/06 dated 29.6.06 whereby this Court directed payment of Rs.50,000/- within one month and to pay the balance within another three months and in case of default to proceed with the execution. The learned Munsiff would submit that thereafter the marriage of the writ petitioner's daughter was conducted and that has stood in the way of compliance of the orders of this Court and so far an amount of Rs.6,15,000/- has been paid and balance will be only Rs.2 lakhs. It is submitted by the learned counsel that if some breathing time is given the amount will be paid and further request will not be made for W.P.C 5056 OF 2008 -:2:- time for payment. Considering these special circumstances I grant three months further time for making the payment. But the writ petitioner is directed to file an affidavit before the Court below that he will not transfer or remove any of the movables which is situated in the property and he can also file a list of movables that are available so that if anybody opposes the Court can verify correctness and the subject matter be preserved in case of default. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-