IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9475 of 2009 PAWAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 08..05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 341 and 307 of the Penal Code. As well as section 25 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither he is named in the first information report nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. It is also stated that neither the informant nor the witnesses to the occurrence as mentioned by the informant in the first information report, have named the petitioner. He further submits that another person, namely, Rajeev Kumar, who was not even a witness to the occurrence, has named the petitioner as a co-accused person after three weeks of the occurrence merely because of previous enmity due to which criminal litigation is going on between them. He also submits that apart from the aforesaid case of Rajeev Kumar, the petitioner has got clean antecedent, but he is in custody since the date of his surrender i.e. 22nd December, 2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition for bail is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Pawan Singh be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00( Rupees ten 2 thousand only ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, III Barh (Patna) in connection with Sessions Trial No.176 of 2009, arising out of Barh P.S. Case No. 263 of 2007 dated 26.06.2007. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )