IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2010 / 21ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 12668 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- MAYA P., D/O.BHASKARAN PILLAI, MAYURI,1/4153 B, EAST HILL,673 005,KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. MR. NIRMAL. S RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHYAMALA, NENNI NIVAS, KAIPATHY MUKKU,AVANAVANCHERY P.O.,TRIVANDRUM. 3. SHEELA KUMARI, PANAYIL VEEDU, AVANAVANCHERY,TRIVAMDRUM 4. ADDITIONAL DISTRICTG MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. MR. P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B MR. C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No. 12668 of 2010 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 12th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: i. issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent not to draw the service line unless the petitioner given a reasonable time to challenge the order passed by the 4th respondent, before this Honourable Court. ii. issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent not to draw the service line during the court vacation. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Board submits, on instructions, that, the cause of action projected in the Writ Petition is quite 'premature', in view of the fact that the matter is pending before the 4th respondent/the Additional District Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram, who is still to pass final orders in the dispute raised before him. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In view of the limited nature of the relief proposed to be given by this Court, issuance of notice to the second and third respondents is dispensed with, for the time being 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 4th respondent is directed to finalize the matter, in accordance with law, after hearing all W.P. (C) No. 12668 of 2010 : 2 : concerned, including the petitioner and the other respondents, which shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month, from the date receipt of copy of the judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd