1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 521 OF 2009 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO.636 OF 2009 Rotary Club of Bombay Worli and Ors. ....Appellants Versus Mr. Subir Satyendranath Sanyal & 4 Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. S.U.Kamdar, Sr.Counsel with Mr. C. D. Mehta & Ms. Trupti Shetty i/b. M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. R. G. Bhat for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 8th MAY, 2009. P.C. Not on Board. Mentioned for urgent production. Production allowed in view of urgency. 2. Heard, Mr. Kamdar, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellants and Mr. Bhat, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 3. The Appellants are the Original Defendants and Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are the Original Plaintiffs and other Respondents are Original Defendants Nos.4 and 13. The S.C. Suit No.901 of 2009 was filed for permanent injunction restraining the Appellants from terminating the membership of the Respondent Nos.1 to 3/Original 2 Plaintiffs except as per due process of law. In this Suit, Notice of Motion no.489 of 2009 was filed for interim relief restraining the Appellants/Org. Defendants by temporary injunction from terminating the membership of the Respondent Nos.1 to 3/Org.Plaintiffs except as per due process of law. The learned Judge of the City Civil Court by an impugned order restrained the Appellants/Org.Defendants from terminating the membership of Respondent Nos.1 to 3/ Org. Plaintiffs without following due process of law till 8th May, 2009. 4. The statement was made at the Bar that the Notice of of Motion No.489 of 2009 is kept today at 2.30 p.m. before the City Civil Court. The impugned order only restrains the Appellants/Org.Defendants from terminating the Respondents/Org.Plaintiffs membership, till today that to without following the due process of law. The Appellants/Org.Defendants are always at liberty to terminate the membership of Respondents/Plaintiffs by following due process of law. In these circumstances, no interference is called for. Appeal from Order is accordingly disposed off. 5. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, the Civil Application No. 636 of 2009 will not survive and therefore, the same is disposed of. (R. V. MORE, J.)