... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.809 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.809 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.809 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Hiranandani holding for Shri C.G.Gavnekar for the Applicant. Shri U.V.Nikam, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 06, 2006. : OCTOBER 06, 2006. : OCTOBER 06, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant. He submitted that the Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail as he was on bail throughout the trial. The conviction of the Applicant is under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and the substantive sentence is of ten years. The allegation against the Applicant is of committing rape on a girl whose age was four years. There is evidence on record against the Applicant. Medical evidence is also against the Applicant. Looking to the gravity and seriousness of the crime and looking to the evidence on record, no case is made out for grant of bail. Application is rejected. Hearing of the Appeal is expedited. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE