WP(C) 3182/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. N.N. Karmakar, learned counsel, for the petitioner, and Mr. BK Sharma, learned counsel, for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioner was a pplicant for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker and Helper for 279 No. Soilmari Gaon Paschim Suba Anganwadi Center. The petitioner claims that the priv ate respondents, who have been selected as Anganwadi Worker and Helper, do not b elong to the place, where the Anganwadi Center is located. As the dispute, raised by the petitioner, is substantially factual in na ture, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the prese nt case, respondent No.2, namely, Director of Social Welfare, Government of Assa m, shall look into the grievances of the petitioner and make enquiry in this reg ard and, in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate order( s). Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondent No.2 or what ever order is, ultimately, passed by the respondent No.2, on the petitioner’s gr ievances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and if the petiti oner feels aggrieved by the decision9s), which may be reached, or the order(s), which may be passed by the respondent No.2, the petitioner shall remain at liber ty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No.2 a certified copy of this or der along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall sta nd disposed of. No order as to costs.