IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 20959 of 2008(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- P.J.KUNJUMON, AGED 45, S/O.P.V.JOSEPH, PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, NEDUVANNOOR KARA, CHOWRA P.O., CHENGAMANAD VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.JAISON JOSEPH SRI.M.N.SANJITH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TVM 2. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRIKKAKARA. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION. 5. ELIZABETH @ MOLLY, W/O.MANUEL, PALLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHANGAMPUZHA ROAD, CHUTTUPADU KARA, EDAPPALLY P.O., EDAPPALLY N.VILLAGE. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 TO R4 ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN FOR R5 SRI.N.S.MOHAN DAS FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO. 20959/2008-T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25/10/2007 FILED BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.4. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO.1228/2007 ON THE FILE OF II MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PETITION IN R.C.P. NO.144 OF 2007 ON THE FILE OF RENT CONTROL COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE D.G.P. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rs/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.20959 OF 2008 T ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF OCTOBER, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner is a tenant of the 5th respondent. He is running a bakery in the building bearing door No.49/1150B of Cochin Corporation. Alleging that he is being harassed by respondents 2 and 4 at the instance of the 5th respondent, this Writ Petition is filed. 2. The learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that the 5th respondent filed a petition against the writ petitioner. To inquire into that, the petitioner was summoned to the Police Station, once. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that this being a civil dispute, police have no intention to interfere in it or harass the petitioner. This submission is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn