THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 6499 of 2009 O R D E R: It appears, the petitioner-establishment is carrying on business in consumer durables and electronics items and, as there was a dispute with regard to coverage of establishment, the petitioner submitted all the records before the concerned authority under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund Act. When the concerned authority had passed order against the petitioner, it was challenged before this Court by filing writ petition and this Court directed the petitioner to file appeal before the Appellate Tribunal and stay of all further proceedings was granted on condition of depositing a sum of Rs.689181/-. The petitioner seems to have deposited the said amount and filed appeal – ATA 371(1)/2005 before the respondent-appellate authority. It seems the appellate authority dismissed the appeal for default on 5.10.2007, in the camp Court held at Chennai. According to the petitioner, no notice of any kind was issued either to the petitioner or to the counsel appearing for the petitioner and the petitioner came to know about the dismissal of the appeal on 23.3.2009 and immediately on 25.3.2009 it had filed a petition seeking restoration of the appeal. While that being so, the respondent herein issued the impugned notice on 25.3.2009 itself. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition is filed. Admittedly, the appeal was dismissed for default when the appellate authority was holding camp Court in Chennai and it appears no notice of any kind was issued either to the petitioner or to its counsel. Further, the petitioner had no information as to what exactly happened to the appeal. When the order was sought to be executed, then only the petitioner had come to know about the dismissal of the appeal and immediately on 25.3.2009 filed petition seeking restoration of appeal, but on the very same day the impugned order was passed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order dated 25.3.2009 is suspended pending consideration of the petition seeking restoration of the appeal filed by the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 26-3-2009. MVB.