IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23697 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, SON OF LATE KISHUN SAO, RESIDENT OF MOHALLAH – MOHAMMADPUR, P.S. SULTANGANJ, DISTT. PATNA AT PRESENT KATHAK TAL, SHERSHAH ROAD, NON- MOHIYAN, PATNA -7, P.S. – ALAMGANJ, DISTT. PATNA. ------ PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 11.5.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. I, Patna, in Criminal Revision No. 669 of 2009 by which he has allowed the revision against the dismissal of an application under Section 311 Cr. P.C. passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna, in Complaint Case No. 297(m) of 1995. It has been submitted that initially one Kapildeo Prasad was not cross-examined and the case was closed but the same was reopened on the order of the Revisional Court and said Kapildeo Prasad was cross-examined consequently. Later, another application was filed for examination of some witnesses but the petition was vague and without enumerating as to how their examination would assist in the just decision of the case. Considering the arguments advanced and after perusing the documents filed herein, the Revisional order dated 11.5.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Patna, is hereby set aside. 2 The application stands allowed. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. With these observations, the application is disposed off. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)