IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50219 of 2008 1. Raj Kumar Yadav S/O Ayodhya Yadav. 2. Birju Yadav S/O Prasadi Yadav, both resident of Village- Churhait , P.S. Sono, District- Jamui. ----Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Bihar-------------------------Opposite Party. --------- 2. 10.12.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 364, 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code was added. Their prayer for bail was earlier rejected on 28.2.2007. It is alleged that some unknown persons alongwith the persons named in the First Information Report entered the house of the informant and kidnapped his eight years grand-son. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that subsequently when the victim boy was recovered, he has named four persons that is Sulo, Chiganj, Uden and Litto Yadav who are not named as accused in the First Information Report. It is further submitted that apart from the present case, a Sono P. S. Case No.70 of 2006 which was instituted on the same day as the present case. The petitioners are not accused in any other cases. The petitioners have remained in custody for more than two years. Considering the aforesaid facts, the petitioners, Raj Kumar Yadav and Birju Yadav are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the I, A.D.J., Jamui in connection with Sono P. S. Case No.69 of 2006 giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 23 of 2007. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)