IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42459 of 2009 RAM NARESH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 19.7.2010. Heard Sri Amrit Abhijat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner was seeking an adjournment on account of the non-availability of the supplementary affidavit which he had filed in the office of the court. Considering the urgency of the matter, I requested the counsel to produce his copy and after having perused the order and contents of the supplementary affidavit, I find that what is argued that the petitioner had not committed any error or had never indulged in acts of forgery or defrauding by virtue of the alleged enhancement made by him in number of account holders, the court still finds that the matter has to go to trial because the basic allegation is required to be tried that the petitioner allegedly misappropriated Rs. 5,00,000/- (five lacs) of the public fund. Having said the above, I find no merit - 2 - in the petition and the same is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )