IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 5094 of 2011(J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. SUSHAMA K., ACHALAMPURATH HOUSE, P.O.PORORA, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, GOVT. HOMEO DISPENSARY, MATTANNUR. 2. P.NARAYANAN, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, GOVT. HOMEO DISPENSARY, KEEZHALOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, (HOMEO) CIVIL STATION, KANNUR-670 002. 2. THE DIRECTOR (HOMEO), DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 037. 3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., HEALTH, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SMITHA SUKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.5094/2011-J: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE G.O.(P).NO.501/2005 DT. 25/1/2005. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE G.O.(P).NO.61/2010/FIN. DT. 09/02/2010. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE COVERING NOTE. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.1 BEFORE THE R.1. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 20/02/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.5094 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated 4th July, 2011 JUDGMENT In view of the order I propose to pass in this writ petition I do not think it necessary to narrate the facts in detail. The petitioners who are part- time casual sweepers filed Exts.P4 and P5 representations respectively before the third respondent. Vide such representations the petitioners seek for regularization of their services and for such other reliefs. They are also relying on certain Government orders to support their claim. However, it is a matter to be looked into, at the first instance, by the third respondent. Since the third respondent is the competent authority to consider and pass orders on the requests made by the petitioners, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioners either in this writ petition or in Exts.P4 and P5 representations, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P4 and P5 in accordance with law expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS