IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6527/2011 Decided on:31.8.2011 _____________________________________________ Ramesh Soni. …Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is heard and being disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of Annexure P-4 dated 8.8.2011. It is not in dispute that no notice was issued to the petitioner before the issuance of office order Annexure P-4 dated 8.8.2011. Annexure P-4 has civil and evil consequences. Petitioner was required to be heard before the issuance of Annexure P-4. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 3. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. Annexure P-4 dated 8.8.2011 is quashed and set aside. However, respondent-corporation is permitted to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 31.8.2011 *awasthi*