IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10634 of 2008 SANT MD.IDRISH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 23.04.2010 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner who is the complainant is aggrieved by the order of cognizance dated 31.5.2006 in Complaint Case No. ( C ) 1622 of 2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, lst Class, Siwan by which he has taken cognizance only against accused 4, 6 and 17. Learned Counsel submits that the allegations were there against all the other accused and therefore once the Magistrate was satisfied of commission of the offence and took cognizance there was no justification for him not to do so against the other accused also. This Court has gone through the allegations in the complaint. They are specific against accused 4, 6 & 17 while against the others it is generalized and omnibus in nature. Once the trial court after enquiry and examination of witnesses has applied its mind and taken cognizance prima facie this Court finds no error calling for interference. This application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)