IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6040 of 2004 AJAY KUMAR, son of Shri Chandeshwar Prasad, R/o village Madanpur, P.S. Ekangarsarai, District Nalanda….Petitioner. Versus 1. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION, through its Managing Director. 2. The Managing Director, Indian Oil Corporation. 3. General manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, vth Floor, Dak Bunglow Road, Patna- 800001. 4. The Divisional Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Patna Divisioin, Patna, Office located atg Third Floor, Maurya Lok Complex, Dakbunglow Road, Patna-800001…..Respondent Ist Party. 5. Kishore Kumar Khemani, son of late Moti Lal Khemani, R/o Mohalla Ara Nawada, P.S. nawada, District- Bhojpur …Respondent Second party. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 to 4. Mr. Kali Das Chatterji, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Amlesh Kr. Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent no.5 : Mr. M.N. Choudhary,Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. 4 30.03.2011 Heard the parties. Entire claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is based on an alleged partnership deed dated 16.07.2003 (Annexure-1) entered into by the petitioner and private respondent no.5. Admittedly in the aforesaid partnership deed neither the respondent Indian Oil Corporation nor its officials nor any of the instrumentality of the State is a party. Apparently, respondentno.5 has been appointed as wholesale dealer of Kerosene Oil by the respondent no.1. Entire dispute raised herein seems to be a private dispute between the petitioner at one side and respondent no.5 at the other side. In such circumstances no writ can be issued in the present case by this Court. Consequently, the writ petition is completely 2 misconceived. It is accordingly dismissed. However, if so advised, the petitioner may seek any other appropriate relief before any other appropriate forum available to him under the law. Rahman/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)