FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5288 OF 2010 “Sanjay S/o. Shamrao Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. C.R. Thorat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for the respondent No.5 CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 12th OCTOBER, 2010. 1] The petition is filed for a limited relief that though the appeal filed by the petitioner before the Additional Commissioner has been allowed on 8th October, 2008, the respondent Chief Executive Officer is not implementing the said order. 2] Shri Bondar, appearing on behalf of the respondent Zilla Parishad states that admittedly, the petitioner does not possess the D.Ed. Certificate and as such, he is not entitled to be continued as a Teacher. 3] He further submits that the respondent Zilla Parishad is willing to reinstate the petitioner, however, subject to outcome of the proceedings that the Zilla Parishad intends to initiate against the petitioner. 4] The petition is, therefore, disposed of by accepting FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5288 OF 2010 “Sanjay S/o. Shamrao Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 the statement made on behalf of the respondent No.3 that the petitioner would be reinstated within 15 days from today. It is further made clear that the same shall be subject to the outcome of the proceedings that the Zilla Parishad may initiate, on the ground that he does not possess the D.Ed. Certificate. [A.A. SAYED, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-