HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4339 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner has purchased a flat on 26.3.2010 from the 1st respondent in a multi-storied complex constructed at Mandapeta town in East Godavari District. She submitted a representation dated 29.11.2010 to the 2nd respondent alleging that the 1st respondent has taken certain steps altering the salient features, such as, reduction of the corridor, shifting of the lift etc. Her grievance is that no action has been taken thereon by the 2nd respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. On its part, the 2nd respondent has accorded permission and the multi storied building has been constructed by the 1st respondent. The question as to whether the 1st respondent has caused any alterations and whether the 2nd respondent can take any action in that behalf needs to be examined. This Court cannot express any final opinion on those aspects. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to examine the representation dated 29.11.2010 submitted by the petitioner and take necessary action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order duly issuing notice to the 1st respondent. No costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY,J DATE: 25th February, 2011 pnb