IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 553 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9234/2009 Dated 30/03/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.S.RAMACHANDRAN,TEJUS HOUSE, PAZHAKULAM WEST,PALLIKKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- RAJU,REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, R.D.O.OFFICE,ADOOR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- COC.No.553 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT It is alleging that Annexure-A5 order passed by the respondent is in violation of the directions of this court in Annexure-A1 and A4 judgments, that the contempt petition is filed. 2. Although the Government Pleader on instructions sought to justify the order, Annexure-A5 order cannot be said to be in compliance with the directions of this court. This is all the more so far the reason that even Annexure- A6 relied on in Ext.A5 does not justify the view that is taken in Annexure-A5. 3. At this stage, the Government Pleader offers to pass a reasoned order in compliance with Annexure A1 and A4 to avoid further proceedings. I record the submission. It is also undertaken that such orders will be passed within one week. COC.No.553/09 2 In view of the above submission I close the contempt petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court if the circumstances warrant. (ANTONY DOMINIC) vi JUDGE COC.No.553/09 3