Civil Revision No.3919 of 2011 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3919 of 2011 Date of decision: July 26, 2011. Jora Singh & Anr. ... Petitioners v. IndusInd Bank Limited ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Ramesh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Present revision petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 30.4.2011 passed by Additional District Judge, Jind ordering that the land of the judgment debtor, which has already been attached, be put to auction. This Court while issuing notice of motion, has passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the impugned order (Annexure P4) was passed on 30.4.2011 and thereafter on 4.6.2011, the Executing Court made efforts to resolve the dispute amicably and the decree holder had agreed to settle the amount for Rs.6,00,000/-, however, due to inability of the petitioners, the compromise could not be concluded and Civil Revision No.3919 of 2011 -: 2 :- recorded. He submits that the petitioners are now ready and willing to deposit the amount of Rs.6,00,000/- as noticed in the order dated 4.6.2011 (Annexure P-3). He further submits that he will deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in the account of the decree holder on or before 13.6.2011 and the remaining amount of Rs.4,00,000/- shall be paid within a period of four months along with the interest. Issue notice of motion for 26.7.2011. Meanwhile, auction, proposed to be held on 14.6.2011, be conducted but the proceedings whereof be not confirmed.” Shri Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, has caused appearance for the respondent and states that in terms of the order dated 9.6.2011, no amount has been deposited by the petitioner. This Court had issued notice of motion only on the assurance given by the petitioners that they are ready to deposit the amount. The petitioners have not proved their bona fide in terms of the contention recorded by this Court in the order issuing notice of motion. No legal issue has been raised for which this Court should come to the rescue of the petitioner. Hence, no interference is warranted and the present revision petition is dismissed. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] July 26, 2011. Judge kadyan