1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.11188/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.19929/2008; CA NO.11189/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.19946/2008. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.DV Tele, AGP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 27 th January, 2010. ... 1) Heard learned AGP. 2) There is delay of 1454 days in causing to file the appeals. The delay is not sufficiently explained. The order of the Reference Court is dated 29.6.2004 while the Land Reference is of 1999. The property was acquired in the year 1991. 3) Incidentally, with the assistance of learned AGP, I have gone through the Order under challenge. The learned Reference Court, while enhancing the compensation to Rs.1,000/- per R., had advantage of browsing the order passed in LAR Nos. 510/1988; 511/1988; 516/1988 and 518/1988 dated 31.12.1990, by which the learned Judge fixed the market value of the lands under reference @ Rs.875/- per Are, though the lands were acquired in the year 1986, whereas the lands 2 under the present reference came to be acquired in the year 1991. 4) Considering the situation and high quality, the learned Reference Court in the present matter enhanced the compensation and made it to Rs.1,000/- per Are. It does not smacks of any illegality. Considering the above grounds, the application for delay rejected. Consequently, the appeals rejected. Necessary court fees be refunded to the appellant. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca11188.08