HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETI'HON (S) N0. 3021 of 2007 . Likeshwar Bhusha khare Aged about 39 Years: S/o. Shri Ram Lal Bhusha Khare, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Kanharpuri, Kanker, Smt. Him Kumari Meshram Aged about 41 Years W/o. Shii Atma Ram Mashram Assistant Teacher, Primary Schocl Practising, Kanker. 3. Smt. Geeta Dutta Rai Aged ahcut 52 Years, W/o. Shri Aashish Dutta Rai Assistant Teacher, Primary School Tikarapara, Kank‘er 4. Sita Ram Komra Aged about 40 Years, S/o. Shri Halal Ram Komra Assistant Teacher, Primary School Kored. All are at Block Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of ClLhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur {C.G.) 3. District Education OEicer Kanker District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Eloclc Education 0&icer Kanker (C.G.) 5. Treasury & Funds Department Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Mr. D.N.Praj apati, Advocate for the petitioners. Nliss Sunita Jain. Panel Lawyer for the State/resyondents. ORDER (Passed on Ilm day of May, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale W.e.f the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weil as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed vide order dated 7. 1 1.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made bv learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/— i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge PETITIONER bJ Present: r