IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 33231 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ZACARIYA P.V. POITHATTATHIL, PANANCHERY, PANANCHERY VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DEPUTY TAHASILDAR (RR), AUTHORISED OFFICER KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISE, THRISSUR – 680 001. 2. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR THRISSUR – 680 001. 3. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES REPRESENTED BY MANAGER,THRISSUR EVENING BRANCH THRISSUR – 680 001. ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN,SC,K.S.F.E. LTD FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 33231 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------- DATED: 24th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT Challenge in this writ petition is against revenue recovery steps initiated pursuant to Ext.P1 notice. The amount sought to be realised pertains to arrears due to the respondents 2 and 3. I find no tenable grounds raised to entertain this writ petition in order to interfere with the proceedings of recovery initiated. 2. However, as a gesture of indulgence, an interim stay was granted against further coercive steps of recovery subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.75,000/- within two weeks from 02.11.2010. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 that the condition has not been complied with. 2. Under the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that the petitioner will be at liberty to approach respondents 2 and 3 for settlement of the account by proposing payment under any reasonable conditions. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. dmb