-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.8942 OF 2004 NO.8942 OF 2004 NO.8942 OF 2004 Shri Lalasaheb J. Ghadage and ors.... Petitioners v/s Sou. Nandini J. Patil and ors. ... Respondents Mr Milind Deshmukh for Petitioners. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH JULY 2005. -2- P.C. :- 1. Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the order of temporary injunction has to be made against the defendants because the defendants prima facie have been found not to have any right over the suit well. These are essentially findings of fact which have been concurrently recorded by the Courts below. i do not see any patent error of law. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------------