1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2006 IN REV.APPLICATION NO.87 OF 2000 Shri Sukhdeo Pandurang Suryavanshi, Applicant. Vs Shri B.N.Nadkarni & Anr. Respondents Ms Sharmila Kaushik, for the applicant. Mr S.V.More, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 6th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 6th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 6th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Leave to amend. 2. The applicant has prayed for a direction to send the record and proceedings, received in criminal revision application no.87 of 2000 pending in this court relating to criminal case no.1563/S/1998,to the trial court since the interim relief granted by this Court in terms of prayer clause (d) was vis-a-vis the petitioner -B.N.Nadkarni only. In the criminal case no.1563/S/1998 there are about eight accused and according to Ms. Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant, if the record is sent back to the trial Court, the trial can proceed against the other accused. In view of this, I am inclined to allow this application in terms of prayer clause (a). Order accordingly. The criminal application is disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)