THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 14476 of 2010 Dated: 23.06.2010 Between: Smt. Sangeetha Devi, Secunderabad. … Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and another. … Respondents HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ petition No. 14476 of 2010 O R D E R: Petitioner claims to be the owner of the premises at plot No.18 Sumithra Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad bearing House No.3-5-25/D/1 in Sy.Nos. 53 and 59 and 3-5-25/D at Baghameeri Village, Balanagar Mandal, Kukatpally Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, Andhra Pradesh. The 2nd respondent by notice dated 25.05.2010 issued under Section 452 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) called upon the petitioner to submit her explanation as to why the alleged unauthorized constructions made by her in the above said premises should not be removed. The petitioner states that she gave an explanation on 12.06.2010 and also submitted a separate representation dated 18.06.2010 to regularize the constructions by collecting the penal charges and the same are still pending. In the meanwhile, the staff of the 2nd respondent-Corporation started taking steps for removal of the constructions in question. Aggrieved by the said action of the respondents, the present writ petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for the Corporation, and having regard to the material placed before this Court, which shows that the petitioner’s explanation dated 12.06.2010 as well as the subsequent representation for regularization dated 18.06.2010 were received by the Office of the Corporation on 18.06.2010, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent-Corporation not to take any steps for demolition of the structures in question unless and until the representations made by the petitioner dated 12.06.2010 and 18.06.2010 are considered and appropriate orders are passed in accordance with law. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not proceed with any further constructions in the premises in question. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J Date: 23.06.2010 KLP