IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30969 of 2009 1. MD.MUMTAZ,son of Md. Mustak 2. Shambhu,son of Kalut. Both are resident of village-Kazi Tola,P.S.-Arrah Town,District-Bhojpur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 05-11-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. There is dispute for possession over a shop may be delivered in favour of the informant but still petitioners are claiming the same. There is further possibility of entering into the shop forcefully even after delivery of possession which is in favour of the informant by the competent court but allegation of theft of rod and cement belies finding further allegation of demand of rupees two lacs. Informant should also be not allowed to make any allegation which is not believable but in any case taking that into consideration the petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Arrah Town P.S.Case No.141/2009, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )