IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 23449 of 2008(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- BISHOP OF KOLLAM,CATHOLIC DIOCESE REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER FR.GEORGE REBEIRO, FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATOR CATHOLIC BISHOP'S HOUSE, KOLLAM BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KOLLAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,KOLLAM 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE KOLLAM 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER VILLAGE OFFICE, ADICHANALLOR 6. SMT. BARBARA ALLERSE, PUNNAMOOTTIL VEEDU THAZHATHUCHALACHERRY, ADICHANALLOR VILLAGE KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM DIST 7. SOBHITHA, BISMI MANZIL, THAZHUTHALA, ADICHANELLOR KOLLAM. 8. THAJUDHEEN, KANIYATTAZHIKOM VEEDU THAZHUTHALA, ADICHANELLOR KOLLAM. 9. THANHAJ, KANIYATTAZHIKOM VEEDU THAZHUTHALA, ADICHANELLOR KOLLAM. 10. MANHAJ, (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND GUARDIAN THAJUDHEEN, KANIYATTAZHIKOM VEEDU THAZHUTHALA, ADICHANELLOR KOLLAM. * ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 11, 12 AND 13 IMPLEADED * ADDL.11TH: RAMACHANDRAN @ GARVASIS, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.LATE ALLERSE, PUNNAMOOTTIL VEEDU, NEAR KOTTIYAM OTTAPLAMOODU ROAD, THAZHUTHALA CHERRY, KOTTIYAM P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT. sts WP(C)NO.23449/2008 *ADDL.12TH: RAJESH @ XAVIER, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.LATE ALLERSE, PUNNAMOOTTIL VEEDU, NEAR KOTTIYAM OTTAPLAMOODU ROAD, THAZHUTHALA CHERRY, KOTTIYAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. *ADDL.13TH: MEENA @ BABY, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.GEORGE, PUNNAMOOTTIL VEEDU, NEAR KOTTIYAM OTTAPLAMOODU ROAD, THAZHUTHALA CHERRY, KOTTIYAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. * IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 22/10/2008 IN I.A.NO.12621/08. R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. RANI DIOTHEMA ADDL.R11 TO R13 BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 23449 OF 2008 ===================== Dated this the 25th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp