1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9587/2008 SMT. SUMITRA DEVI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF ORDER : 05.10.2009. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. CS Kotwani for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhati for the respondents. Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in this writ petition is covered by the issue settled in Smt. Vishnu Kanwar & 157 ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. Reported in 2009 WLC(Raj.) UC – 186. On examination of the record, I am satisfied that the controversy is no more res integra in view of the judgment referred above. Accordingly, this petition for writ is disposed of in the terms of the Smt. Vishnu Kanwar's case (supra). The respondents are directed to consider the period consumed by the petitioner in undergoing training necessary for appointment as Prabodhak, the period of leave sanctioned or the leave availed for the reason beyond control as part of teaching experience acquired. The period aforesaid is also not required to be considered as break in service. As such, the respondents should act expeditiously to give effect to the select list relating to the petitioners and also relating to the persons similarly situated, as 2 far as possible within a period of one and half month from today by giving appointment to him, if she is otherwise eligible. It shall be open for the respondents to demand original documents and other relevant facts from the petitioner to get satisfied about her claim for the period relating to teaching experience and leave in question. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/