HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Writ Petition no. 894 of 2008 Ahtesham Qureshi and three others. ......Petitioners. Versus State and four others. ......Respondents Mr. Rahul Consul, Adv. for the petitioners. Sri Harish Pujari, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State /respondents. Nainital: November 12, 2008 Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. V.K. Gupta, C.J. (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is a case where we are afraid, we cannot exercise our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the F.I.R. in question because on a bare and plain reading the F.I.R. does suggest that the offence apparently has been committed. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Bist, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 12.11.2008 NCM: