In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.25252 of 2008 Md. Sultan Vrs. The State of Bihar **** /2/ 17.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, cousin father-in-law and cousin mother-in-law, who are accused in Raj Nagar P.S. Case No. 158 of 2007 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute has already been resolved and the parties have compromised the dispute. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, Md. Sultan, Md. Mansoor, Kuresa khatoon, Md. Soyab @ Md. Suyab and Rezena Khatoon @ Razina Khatoon @ Puniya Khatoon, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with the aforementioned case to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. The Chief Judicial Magistrate before accepting the bail bond of petitioner no. 1, Md. Sultan, will call the informant and get it verify whether in reality the informant has compromised the dispute. In case it is not found correct, bail bond of petitioner no. 1 will not be accepted and anticipatory bail be not granted to him. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )