I'tf'^y...^ -' '\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Appellant Applicant Respondent Applicant F.A.No.193of2004 Smt Usha Bai W/o Rohit Kumar, Aged about 24 years, R/o Chherkapur, Present Address : Tikrapara, Raipur District Raipur Versus Rohit Kumar S/o Chaitram Sahu, aged about 25 years, R/o Chherkapur, PS Pallari, Tahsii Baioda Bazar, District Raipur APPEAL UNDER SECTION 28 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. 1955 (SB: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Aaarwal. J.) Present : Shri SC Verma, Advocate for appellant. Shri Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent. ORDER (Passed on 15th day ofApriI, 2010) Heard on IA No. 2, compromise application dated 12,04.2010 filed under Order 23 (3) of CPC alongwith affidavlt of both the parties. The evidence of both the parties have been recorded. The appeilant in her statement has deposed that after passing of divorce decree in the year 2003, re-union took place on 15.05.2006 andsince then the appellant and respondent are living together as husband and wife in Raipur city and they are blessed with son Aryan, aged about 2 years. There is no dispute now ieft between them. They have compromised the matter and wants permanentlyto live as husband and wife. Respondent Rohit/husband in his statement also deposed the samefaots. Sahu 4. 5. 6. 7. It appears that the appeilant an'd respondent Rohit Kumar bonafidely wants tolive together and lead happy marriage jife. The compromise appears to be lawful. In view of above, the application is ailowed, the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2003, passed by thetnal court is hereby set aside. Consequently, the appeal is allowed jn terms of compromise dated 12.04.2010. No order asto costs. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^ ^ ^ i^iB^ 1-^^ s'^^