IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 980 of 2003. Decided on: 14th December, 2010. Devi Singh and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioners: None. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner has challenged Annexure P-3, notification. There is also a prayer for fixation of price in prayer (b), which reads as follows: “(b) That the respondents may kindly be directed to fix the price under proviso 2 of Section 7 of the H.P. Forest Produce (Regulation) Act, 1982 within a time bound directions. 2. In view of the stand taken in the reply that the petitioners had received the amount without any protest and with the mutual consent given in the agreement among the parties. In case the petitioners have still any grievance left, it will be open to them to approach the first respondent. We make it clear that in case the first respondent has re-fixed the price of any similarly situated persons, such procedure shall be adopted in the cases of the petitioners herein also. 2 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 14th December, 2010 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge. 3