IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-9691 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:19.05.2008 Kismat Singh .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. The allegations in the FIR were that all the accused after breaking the lock of the house of the complainant had thrown the articles out. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations are quite vague. Six of the co-accused who were arrested had already been released on regular bail by the trial Court. The petitioner has already joined the investigation, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the State. Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the controversy, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 16.4.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. May 19, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE