{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6286 OF 2009 Kisan Pratishthan, Beed PETITIONER VERSUS The Union of India and Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.B.N.Patil h/f Mr.R.N.Kolekar, Advocate for petitioner Mr.Alok Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 12th October 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is a petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioner impugns the order dated 14.01.2009 passed by the second respondent i.e. National Council for Teacher’s Education, Western Regional Committee, Bhopal, declining to grant permission / recognition to the B.Ed. college of the petitioner, as per the proposal submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner, by way of an alternate prayer, prays for remitting the matter back to respondent No.2 for affording opportunity to submit written explanation. {2} 2. According to us, the petitioner has an alternate remedy of appeal u/s 18 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993. In that light of the matter, therefore, we dismiss the petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal. We, further, clarify that in the event an appeal is filed by the petitioner, the appellate authority shall make every endeavor to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/wp6286-09