1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7403/2010 Jitin Vs. State Date of order : 25/8/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Mahesh Gupta for the petitioner. Shri Peeyush Kumar, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that allegation against the petitioner is that the vehicle, which was used by the other accused has been registered in the name of his mother, whereas the accused petitioner has not been named in the FIR. There are two injured, while injured Rizwan sustained one injury, which has been found to be grievous, but that injury was on hand and has been attributed to Naved Khan, who has been enlarged on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C. The other injured Yunus sustained simple injuries and none of them have been assigned to accused petitioner. All accused have been enlarged on bail. There is no evidence about the involvement of the petitioner in the present case. Petitioner is only 19 years of age and has no other criminal case against him, whereas the injured have many other criminal 2 cases against them. The disputed occurred on the dispute of giving side to the vehicle. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation against the petitioner, the materials collected so far during the course of investigation and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant the indulgence of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. In the result, this bail application u/S.438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Jitin S/o James M.C. in FIR No.49/2010, P.S. Jalupura, Jaipur for offences under Sections 143, 341 and 323 of IPC, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions: - 1) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/