1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO. 10180 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 201 OF 1988 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders and Registrar’s orders CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th August, 2009. . It is urged by Shri Dhorde, learned counsel for the applicant that the finding recorded by this court on the question of limitation is erroneous. He contends that the suit presented by the plaintiff is beyond prescribed period of limitation. Even if, accepting the contentions raised by the applicants, erroneous decisions on a particular aspect will not permit the court to review its own order. There is no good ground to exercise jurisdiction while dealing with the review application. Review application therefore stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb / office /rast10180.09.odt 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5743 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders and Registrar’s orders CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th August, 2009. 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 174 days occurred in presenting the review application seeking review of the order passed by this court on 13-2-2009. 2. Heard Shri Dhorde, learned counsel for the applicants. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is according allowed. Delay stands condoned. Civil application stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb / office /rast10180.09.odt 3