IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1909 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1909 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 1909 OF 2005 Milan Sub way Cooperative ... Petitioners Housing Society & Anr. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. P.M. Havnur i/b. R.S. Upadhyay for petitioners. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. G.D. Utangale for respondent No.2. Mr. P.A. Purandhare for respondent No.5. Mr. H.S.S. Anand for respondent No. 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 22nd September, 2006 : 22nd September, 2006 : 22nd September, 2006 P.C. . On behalf of respondent No. 6, it has been pointed out that the building has been constructed and Occupation Certificate issued on 20th April, 2006 and the building has been occupied. It is the petitioner who appointed respondent No. 6 as a developer. 2. The contention of the petitioner is strange. It is contended that many names in the annexure are bogus and are not eligible. If that be so, the petitioners to file complaint to respondent No. 2. The respondent No. 2 to examine the complaint and take necessary action and if respondent No. 2 finds ( 2 ) that any bogus persons have been admitted, register Criminal complaint against those who are responsible for the same. 3. With the above observations, the petiton stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]