WP(C) 1934/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Review/clarification of the order dated 9.6.2009 in WP(C) 1934/2009 is sought by the petitioner/contractor on the ground that the additional work is required to be executed under the short tender notice dated 15.5.2009, as compared to the w orks specified under the NIT dated 7.4.2001. The work in question in both the NI Ts pertains to construction of a school approach road from Ch 500.00 metres to 1 400.00 metres. The Review petitioner has enclosed a chart (Annexure-19) showing the additional works that the contractor is required to execute as per the 2009 NIT, which acco rding to the Review petitioner were not contemplated to be executed under the NI T dated 7.4.2001. This additional works pertain to (a) Excavation of Marchy Soil , (b) Dismantling of Existing Structure, (c) Prime Coat, (d) Tack Coat, (e) Surf ace Dressing, (f) S.D.B.C. and (g) Dry Rubble Flooring. When this Court passed its order on 9.6.2009, neither the writ petitioner nor th e departmental counsel brought to the notice of the Court that such additional w ork is required to be executed as per the short tender notice dated 15.5.2009. While it is difficult to accept the contention made by the Review petitioner tha t he had given consent to complete the road work at the same cost without taking into account the additional work involved under the NIT dated 15.5.2009, consid ering the public interest involved in the matter as the road in question remains incomplete and people are suffering, let a Notice returnable in 10 days be issu ed. Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel for the Public Works Department accep ts notice for all the respondents. Extra copies may be served on him. List on 3.5.2010.