IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.301/2008 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5899/2007 6.8.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Smt. Archana Mantri, for the petitioner. Shri Parag Rastogi,for the Contemnor. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This court after considering the contempt petition issued the notices to the respondent No.2 Shri P.C. Kishan, Secretary, UIT, Ajmer, who is present in person today and who has been identified by his counsel Shri Parag Rastogi, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2. In the contempt petition it has been alleged that the directions contained in the order dated 18.6.2008 have not been complied with. The aforesaid order was passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5899/2008. The directions are as follows: “In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the interim prayer of the petitioners is allowed and the respondent No.1 is directed to hand over the original lease deeds No.513 dated 20.2.2008 in respect of residential portion admeasuring 973.98 Sq.Yards and Lead Deed No.550 dt.20.2.2008 in respect of commercial admeasuring 478.02 Sq.Yards to the petitioners forthwith for taking further legal action thereupon. List the matter for final hearing after Vacations before the regular Bench as no prayer has been made by the learned Government Advocate to file the reply.” Shri Parag Rastogi appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 has submitted that in compliance of the order dated 18.6.2008 the lease deeds have been handed over to the petitioner on 19.6.2008. -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid lease deeds could not be registered as the same were not accompanied with the site plan and also on account of the fact that on the said lease deeds a note had been appended which was extraneous and on account of which the lease deeds could not be registered. So far as the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned, the same would be considered at the rehearing of the writ petition. Suffice it to say that so far as directions contained in the order dated 18.6.2008 are concerned, I am satisfied that since the lease deeds have been supplied to the petitioner on 19.6.2008, sufficient compliance has been made by the respondent No.2, of the order dated 18.6.2008. In view of the above, the notices issued to the respondent No.2 shall stand discharged and the contempt petition stands dismissed and consigned to record. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS