- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NOS.7656/2008 & 7673/2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7656/2008 Sheela Uttam Kamble. ...Petitioner.. Versus The Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri P.M. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- WRIT PETITION NO.7673/2008 Rekha Tanaji Gaikwad. ..Petitioner.. Versus The Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad & others. ..Respondents.. Shri P.M. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - 2 - ..... CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.V. POTDAR,JJ. DATE: 14.07.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Inspite of grant of leave to amend, he did not amend the petitions. The petitioners were called for personal interview, which is clear from Exhibit B – letter dated 20.6.2008. The right of the petitioners is only to get themselves considered for the post. Since that consideration is there, we do not see any legal right in favour of the petitioners to claim appointment as of right. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar,J.) (V.C. Daga, J.) ndk/c1470931