IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.C.C.A.No.68 of 1992 Between: P.Surya Prakash … Petitioner And P.Suryakantam and others … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.C.C.A.No.68 of 1992 ORDER:- No representation for the learned counsel for the appellant. The appeal is filed against the claim petition in E.A.No.184 of 1991 in E.P.No.32 of 1991, where under for the maintenance decree the movable properties were attached, which are 1) Iron Almarah, 2) One tea poy, 3) One decolum table, 4) One dinning table, 5) two radios, 6) One wooden chair, 7) One decolum cot, 8) Three ceiling fans and 9) One wooden cot. The claimant is no other than the son of the decree holder and the deceased judgment debtor. All of them lived together. At the age of 11 years, the movable properties are said to have been gifted to the claimant by his father. The lower court evidently did not accept the contention and dismissed claim petition. Nobody knows as to whether after a period of 20 years the articles shown in the attached list are still available and if available they were of any value. Therefore, the pendency of the appeal at this length of time is totally infructuous and the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J 18th November 2010 lmv