SSK/907 1 cao 134.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.28 OF 2011 in WRIT PETITION NO.1942 OF 2011 Kiran Anandrao Patil ....Applicant Versus 1. Shri Sunil Gopalrao Suryavanshi ...Respondent No.1/Org.Petitioner 2. Shri Vivekanand P. Pai & Ors. ...Respondent No.2 & Ors. Mr. S. V. Sadavarte, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Suresh S. Shah, Advocate for the Respondent No.1/Org.Petitioner Mr. P. C Kansra, Advocate for respondent no.2. Mr. A. B Vagyani, AGP for respondent nos. 3 & 5. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2011. P.C.: The civil application is filed by the applicant who claims to be the owner of the premises in which the Restaurant and Bar is being run by the respondent no.2. The premises licence/orchestra licence is granted in the name of respondent no.1. However, that licence was granted on premises belonging to the applicant. Therefore, applicant if not necessary party is surely a proper party. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 2. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today. (RANJIT MORE, J.)