IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 2.12.2011 CWP No. 23277 of 2011 Pardeep Kumar and ors ...Petitioners Versus State Bank of Patiala and ors …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Anil Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. Challenge in the present petition is to the notices Annexures P- 6 to P-8 dated 5.10.2011 and Annexures P-9 & P-10 dated 22.6.2011 purportedly under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short the 'Act'). The sole grievance of the petitioners is that such notices were not served upon the petitioners. Such disputed question of fact can be raised by the petitioners in proceedings under the Act. In view thereof, we do not find any reason to entertain the present petition. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE CWP No.18193 of 2011 20.12.2011 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) preeti JUDGE 2