IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1217 of 2010(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- 1. SADIQUE, S/O.MUHAMMED, KAREKKAT VEETTIL, KOOLIMUTTAM VILLAGE, MATHILAKAM PANCHAYATH, KODUNGALLOOR. 2. MRS.BINDU,W/O.SADIQUE, KAREKKAT VEETTIL, KOOLIMUTTAM VILLAGE, MATHILAKAM PANCHAYATH, KODUNGALLOOR. BY ADV. SRI.A.B.JALEEL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MATHILAKAM PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MATHILAKAM PANCHAYATH, KODUNGALLOOR. 2. THE SECRETARY, MATHILAKAM PANCHAYATH, MATHILAKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MATHILAKAM, KODUNGALLOOR ADDL.R3 IMPLEADED: MR.SUBRAMNIAN, S/O NARAYANAN, THAYAVALLIYIL HOUSE, KOOLIMUTTOM VILLAGE, MATHILAKAM PANCHAYAT. ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 2.6.10 IN I.A.No. 6738/10. ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.1217/10 PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF DEED NO.673/1//09 OF MATHILAKAM SUB REGISTRY DATED 28.2.09. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.11.09. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.11.09. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN OF THE COMPLETED HOUSE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT DATED 31.10.09. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30.11.09. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 11.12.09. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.1217 of 2010 --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 9th DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the Panchayat to issue the completion certificate, ownership certificate and number of the house expeditiously. 2. Exhibit P2 is the application submitted by the petitioner for grant of Ownership Certificate. It is submitted that the same is required for electrifying the house. 3. In spite of service of notice, the 3rd respondent has not appeared. 4. The learned Standing Counsel for the Panchayat submitted that the Panchayat had been trying for a settlement between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, but did not succeed. 5. Whatever that be, it is upto the Panchayat to consider the application and communicate the decision to the petitioner after consideration of all aspects in accordance with the relevant rules. Therefore, there will be a direction to respondents 1 and 2 W.P.(C)No.1217/10 -2- to communicate the decision on the application submitted by the petitioner as per Exhibit P2 within a period of two weeks. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. dsn