:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.644 OF 2006 Mr.Anil D. Revankar. ..Applicant. Vs. Mr.Anil B. Shirodkar and anr. ..Respondent. Mr. M.J. Bhatt for the Applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 21st July, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocate for the applicant. Advocate for the respondent No.1 is absent. I have perused the record. The application and the proposed appeal involve arguable question of law. The acquittal is on the basis of the agreement. This agreement was not produced in the examination in chief of the accused. In fact the accused stated in his examination in chief that he did not have any document relating to the alleged transaction of gold which according to him was the basis for issuance of undated cheque as security. The agreement is produced during the re-examination. The attesting witnesses are close relatives. Hence, matter requires reconsideration. Hence, leave granted. Office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 :2: 1. By a separate order passed today, leave has been granted. Hence, appeal admitted. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)