IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.39 OF 2010 Between:- Panchagiri Lakshmi …Petitioner A n d Jetti Odelu and 3 others …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.39 OF 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 31-10-2009 in C.M.A.No.49 of 2008, on the file of the III-Additional District Judge, Warangal, wherein the said appeal filed by the respondents herein, the defendants, was allowed and the order dated 09-06-2008 in I.A.No.824 of 2006 in O.S.No.363 of 2006, on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, was set aside. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner herein filed the suit for permanent injunction against the respondents. Along with the suit, she filed I.A.No.824 of 2006 for temporary injunction. The respondents/defendants opposed the said application. After due enquiry, the trial Court, by order dated 09-06- 2008 allowed the said application and the ex parte temporary order granted on 05-09-2006 was made absolute subject to the result of the main suit. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants filed an appeal in C.M.A.No.49 of 2008. The learned Additional District Judge, by the impugned order dated 31-10-2009, allowed the appeal and set aside the order of temporary injunction granted by the trial Court. Thus, an injunction in favour of the plaintiff was in force since the filing of the suit in 2006 till it was vacated by the appellate Court on 31-10-2009. The plaintiff, therefore, filed the present civil revision petition. 4. By interim order dated 17-02-2010 in CRP.MP.No.72 of 2010, this Court granted interim injunction for a period of eight weeks and subsequently it is being extended. Thus, an injunction in favour of the plaintiff is in force even now. 5. As the suit is also one for permanent injunction and having regard to the fact that the suit was filed in the year 2006 and the appellate Court also directed the trial Court to dispose of the suit itself as expeditiously as possible, as the plaintiff is a senior citizen, it is considered that instead of going into the merits of the case at this stage, the ends of justice would be met by directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit itself at an early date. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time the suit is disposed of, the interim injunction granted by this Court shall remain in force. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 15th February, 2011 Lrkm.