IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2010 / 21ST ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2994 of 2010() ------------------------------------- CRIME NO.498/10 OFVADAKARA POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE .......................................... PETITIONER (S):/IST ACCUSED ------------------------------------------ P.P.MANOJ, S/O.KELAPPAN, PUTHUKKUDI PARAMBATH, THODANNOOR (POST), VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAKARA POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sou. K. HEMA, J ---------------------- B.A.No.2994 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of July, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under sections 147, 148, 324, 452, 427 r/w 149 PC. According to prosecution, on 26.4.2010 at about 2 am, petitioner (A1) along with other accused formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and trespassed into the house of defacto complainant and hurled bomb at the house of defacto complainant and caused injuries to defacto complainant's wife. They also caused damage to window glasses, doors etc. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is a teacher, working in a muslim school. He is a supporter of CPI(M). He has no enemity towards any members of Muslim League. A false complaint is lodged against petitioner out of political enemity. It is also submitted that a counter case is registered in respect of the same incident. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned public prosecutor submitted that the allegations made against petitioner are serious B.A. No.2994/10 2 in nature. Petitioner is involved in two crimes on the same day and his custodial interrogation is necessary. Defacto complainant's wife was also injured in this case. This is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 5. On hearing both sides, considering the serious nature of allegations made, I find that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Petitioners are bound to surrender before the investigating officer and co-operate with investigation. 6. No further application for anticipatory bail in this crime will be entertained by this court hereafter. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou.