IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 WA.No. 272 of 2011() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36733/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ GOVIND VISHNU A., B-TECH BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING STUDENT, SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695018, RESIDING AT: KOVILAKAM, CHAVARA P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA SMT.S.MEERA SMT.M.G.AISHWARYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695034. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695034. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695034. 4. THE SENATE, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN (VICE-CHANCELLOR), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695034. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695018. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. FOR R1 TO 4 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, & BHABANI PRASAD RAY, JJ. -------------------------------------------- W.A. No. 272 of 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard counsel for the appellant and we have also gone through the judgment of the learned single Judge. Appellant was not allowed to write the 7th Semester examination for want of attendance, which was beyond the condonable limit under the University Rules. However, when WPC was filed, this Court permitted the appellant to write the 7th Semester examination provisionally and to continue the 8th semester and to write the 8th semester examination. However, after final hearing, WPC filed by the appellant was dismissed vide Ext.P8 judgment. Appellant tried to get the same relief by filing the present WPC which was dismissed by the learned single Judge. It is against this judgment that this Writ Appeal is filed by the appellant. We do not find any merit in the appeal and the same is consequently dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge. (BHABANI PRASAD RAY) kk Judge. 2