1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8356 OF 2005 Satish Ramchandra Sangle .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Umesh Mankapure for applicant Mr.R.Y.Mirza, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22nd December 2005. P.C. . Heard Mr.Mankapure for applicant and Mr.Mirza, A.P.P. for State. 2. Applicant aplies for anticipatory bail in a case where he has been prosecuted for non payment of P.F. dues to employees. Total dues are Rs.71,582/-. C.R. is lodged at Islampur Police Station being C.R.No.215 of 2005 for 2 offences punishable under secrtion 406 and 34 I.P.C. 3. After having heard Mr.Mankapure and perusing the application and annexures thereto, in my view, interest of justice would be served if time is given to applicant to show his bonafides in the matter. This time is granted because Mr.Mankapure took instructions from applicant and he is agreeable to pay some amount without prejudice to his rights and contentions. In the light of this following order:- i) In the event of the arrest of the applicant in connection with C.R.No.215 of 2005 registered with Islampur Police Station, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one/two sureties in the like amont. 3 ii) Applicant shall attend Islampur Police station as and when summoned. iii) Bail is granted subject to the condition that applicant shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the police officer/investigating agency. Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. iv) Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. v) This order will enure to the 4 benefit of the applicant only till charge sheet is filed. Thereafter he will be free to apply to the appropriate court for appropriate relief. vi) Application disposed of vii) Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. 4. This order will remain effective upon applicant depositing the amount as stated above within the period specified above. Needless to state that if the amount is not deposited as undertaken, the order enlarging the applicant on bail in the event of his arrest shall cease to operate and it would be open for respondents to initiate such proceedings as are permissible in law. 5 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)