r.\^> tT'r(^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wn't petltion No. 32-4-c / 2004 Petitioner Prakash Chandra Pathak S/o Late Mooratlal Pathak Aged About 55 Years Sub-Registrar, Teh. Balodabazaar Raipur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS Respondents /.sfl.' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretaiy, t4i 'F;i/'AMC£t^l'i^' y, rs< Department ofl'SSeSfWWfQi' Planning, **'A •**\ v<* '*s^ e!llY'^'yc\y (Comniercial Tax Departrnent '^i^^y D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, o'm^ \^ ,/<^y ^•'^ A" .•<? ^•'y Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Inspector General Registration Superintendent Stamps Departanent of Registration Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Shri P.P. Swamkar Aged (not known) S/o (not known) Sub-Registrar, Registry Office Raipur, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OUNDIA 85 ,;l:li'':i •.!'3ii XI-HC-22 sn^T^i R-fi'* 3n^?r Sit)*l <-tfi^T 27-9-2004 -I- ?^^" -ysi -^WM^, ®ti1<H'is,(»«iwi( STf^f XRF^ . W;..^../yo;..2.^.Qy^O^- TiraCT'^WS?""'"""" '"""""" /'•Ht. ^00 fN^ar' 3|I^?t ^<BW(l{?(I Advodatc yeays. grt>und Hetfariher Shri Raja Sharma, Advoeate fot Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Application for urgent hearing Heardfln LA No. 6904/2004 f{»r i Application is allowed. Heard. Leamed counsel for the petiti|oner transfer of the petitioner. He fiirthet" transferred from Baloda Bazar to daughters of22 and 24 years. Couns^l remained at Saraipali for about 7 been transferred on admmistrative been transfen-ed on his own cost. It is accommodate respondent no. 3. petitioner may be given an opportun|ity before tiie competent authority of thej on its ovm merits in accordance with Having considered and without| the case, in the opinion of this Coifrt, direction is given to the petitioner to grievances before the competent au4ority eopy ofthe petitionand this order, wi^hin being filed, the competent authority on its own merits in accordance wilto U six weeks fi"om the date ofreceipt ofth^ Shri Sharma submits that th4 Saturdav and he be allowed to continu^ Ifthe petitioner has not been r^l made clear that ifthe petitioner has him to rejoin in the earlier place ofpos(ing. With the aforesaid observationsj Consequently M.W.P.No.2832/ C.c. as per rules. .i|oner submits that the matter relates to submits that the petitioner has been Saraipali. He has two marriageable ^l submits that tlie petitioner has already It is suhmitted that the petitioner has whereas the respondent no. 3 has submitted that he lias been transferred to submits that for the present the of flling the detailed representation |respondents, which shall be considered 4>i^^d41'i •tn^^'^ fs^T^Rii^K ^i'3lfSOT 3Ilt?F the peUtioner. Gcncral for respondents 1 and 2. allowed. exenytion fromtyped copy. la|w. ntake expressing aay opinion oa the merits of ends of justice will be served if a a detailed representation raising his of the respondents along with a 10 days, and on suchrepresentation c|fthe respondents shall decide the same l^.w as early as possible preferably within h^ representaiion. petitioner has not been relieved till ! till the representation is decided. r eved, he be allowed to continue. It is 1>een relieved,this order will not entitle sfing. 1 this petition stands disposed of. /|2004 also stands disposed of., Sd/- Fakhruddin ['T^^Pa^