IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14379 of 2009 1. LUTERU SAW 2. BINOD SAW --- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the articles from the house of the informant shown looted, is owned by the petitioners which they had purchased from one Khurshid Alam. Really the informant was intended to purchase the land which Khurshid Alam sold to the petitioners and after constructing the house, they are residing there. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Bikram P.S.Case No.135 of 2008, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of - 2 - Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI