IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2009 / 5TH BHADRA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 985 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.1332/2009 Dated 20/01/2009 .................... PETITIONER: -------------- IBRAHIM V.A., S/O. AMMU, AGED 60, SUNSHINE FLOORINGS, PULLUT BUILDING NO.XXX/168, (AI)(NEW), NEAR CHAPPARA BUS STOP, KODUNGALLUR-680 663. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT: --------------- BALACHANDRAN, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R. Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt Case (Civil) No. 985 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. When this Contempt Case came up for consideration on August 26, 2009, we had directed the Sub Inspector of Police, the respondent, to appear before this Court in view of the specific allegation that the said officer was trying to intervene in the matter ignoring the specific direction issued by the Division Bench. 2. The officer states before us that he had in no way violated any of the directions contained in the judgment. He submits that he will abide by the directions and if any dispute arises between the registered Head Load workers in the area on one side and the workers attached to the petitioner on the other, he will direct them to approach the competent authority. In his affidavit the officer has stated that petitioner had been found engaging outside workers and it was therefore that he had summoned the petitioner and other CCC No. 985 of 2009 -:2:- registered workers to the Police Station. Any how, having regard to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, we are not satisfied that there was any wilful disobedience on the part of the respondent. In that view of the matter no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Petition. Therefore it is closed. S.R. Bannurmath, Chief Justice. A.K. Basheer, Judge. ttb