IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6174 of 2010 RAJNISH KUMAR, S/O SRI KRISHNA BALLABH YADAV, R/O MOHALLA- ASHOK NAGAR, ROAD NO. 8, P.S - KANKARBAGH, PATNA-20. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION ,PATNA. 4. THE PRAMUKH, THE CHAIRMAN OF LOCAL LEVEL EMPLOYMENT SAMITTEE, SAMPATCHAK BLOCK , PATNA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,SAMPATCHAK, PATNA. 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER ,PARSA, SAMPATCHAK, DISTRICT- PATNA. 7. THE SECRETARY,DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT COMPUTER BUILDING , GOVT. GIRL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, BANKIPUR, GOLGHAR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 17.1.2011 The findings are already there recorded with regard to the claim of the petitioner to be appointed on the post of Panchayat teacher, may be under hearing impaired candidate category. In fact, there is a categorical finding that petitioner was not even called for counselling at the relevant time but he raised a bogey of his claim on the ground that other short-listed candidates over and above him did not turn up for counselling despite their name figuring in the merit list. With the findings being what they are, petitioner never had a right to be considered or appointed on the post. In absence of any legal infirmity having been pointed out there is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the decision of the authority. Writ has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)