IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRR 3257 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.03.2011 Murti Devi ........ Petitioner Versus Prahlad Singh .......Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) On 25.10.2010, the matter was adjourned to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to supply correct address of the respondent within three weeks. However, no correct address was supplied. Thereafter, the matter was once again adjourned to 13.01.2011. On that date, learned counsel for the petitioner sought some more time to do the needful. As per office report, fresh notice could not be issued as correct address has not been supplied till date nor is any one present on behalf of the petitioner in Court today. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 15.03.2011 mohan