IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17201 of 2011 Md. Nazir, S/o Md. Sharif. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 04.07.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner is husband of the informant and admittedly, the marriage of petitioner had taken place with the informant and after marriage informant gave birth two children out of aforesaid wed lock. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to keep the informant with full honour and dignity but as a matter of fact it is informant who does not want to lead her conjugal life with petitioner on account of her illicit relation. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the aforesaid plea was never taken before the learned Court below moreover, if petitioner is ready to keep the informant, then there is no hurdle to take step to patch up the dispute of the parties. Accordingly, petitioner namely Md. Nazir is directed to be released on bail provisionally for the period of four months on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali (Hajipur) in connection with Goroul (Kathara) P.S. Case No. 185 of 2010. It is made clear that after release of the petitioner from custody, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur/ learned Trial Court shall issue a notice to informant as well as to petitioner for attending the Court for re- cancellation and if in response to the aforesaid notice, informant appears before the Trial Court and expresses her desire to lead her conjugal life with petitioner and the aforesaid proposal of the informant is accepted by the petitioner, the learned Trial Court shall confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner but if due to latches or rigid approach of the petitioner, the aforesaid reconcillation does not take place, the learned Trial Court shall not confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner. It goes without saying that if on account of rigid approach of the informant, the process of reconcillation is not materliged, the provisional of the petitioner would be confirmed by the learned Trial Court. Ibrar/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)