Sitss5®8 CFi^>t- IN THE HIGH COURT OR UUDICATUR&ATBIi.ASF'UR WntF>et!tion(S)Np. -/t&\ o Of 2006 Petitioner: ,<x^-^ ^y. v ^l^c;..- /-S-€^""' .A'5A" \\--" . •••\ s^^ s^c^ << ^*^u- Respondents: Prashant Sjngh Katlam aged., S&^years, S/6 Shri'TribhuWan'Singh Katlam, '^ Sub Divisional Qffieer , (F'olice), Gariaband, (Oh medical ^ilieaMe^ Resident: of Civil.' Lines, ^ ©ariaband, District . Raipur, Ghhattisgarh' '; . VER«t^S "I. State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough the^- SeGretary, ©Qveriimenf bf , ChhattisgarR, D.K.S Bhawan, Mahtralaya, RaipurChhatfisgarh 2. The .Director General of Police,^ Police Headquarters, Raipur, Ctihatfisgarh 3. The Inspector General of Police.y Raipur Ratige, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Senjpr ^URerintendent dfR'olice^ "Raipui-District Raipur.CI-ihaftisgarh:,, WRIT PETITION UNDER .ARTIOLE 226 QR THE ©ONST!'TUTI@N OF INDIA FOR ISSUANGE OR^A WRIT IN THE N^^ CERTIORARI, MXNDftMlJS^ORDSR^RL^^ OR'DIREeTIONSORfHELlKE HIGiH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BHASFUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATI8H K. AGNIHOTM. J. !K ^.- ':\ WRTFPETmONrS.1 N04810 OF2086 Petitioner Prashant Smgh Kstflam Resoondents vensus State ofChhatrisgarh and others Present : Mr. R.S.Ma^ia^ (KiiaseliOT^ petiitioner. Mrs. Aiyu iyiuja, Deputy Govermnen^ fbr the respondentS/Stote. ORDER (Passedon5fllofSeptember,2006) <^ Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thatthe petitioner was anployed asSub-Divisional OfBeer (Police) and posted at Gariaband, District Raipur. By wder dated 5-8-2006 (Annexure P-1), the petifioner has been traasfared to Kanker in fhe •f^ . ~. same capacity. Leamed counsel farther states tiiat there isa threat on the Ufe ofthe petitionerand he is in fhe hit-list oftheNa^ilites operating in the Naxalite affectedareas. Transfemng the petitioner to fheNaxalite affected alea.amountsto irivitiag theNaxalite Grmip ^ A .-1-" to fecilitate attack on his life. Leamed counsel further states that the petitioner has already made representation dated 21-8-2006 (Annexure P-14). Before that, a representatiqn to the same efiect was made bythe father of the petitioner also. The raspondents - autfaorities have issued a notice to ralieve the petitiona' from his present place of posting without considering bis representation pending before them. 2. In view oftfaa^ tiie petitioner seeks a direction ofthis Court to respondente No.l and 2 to consider his representatioa pending before them before laking any step for relieving him from the post, to which leamed counsel appearmg for Ihe respondents/State has no objection. 3. Respbndents No.land 2 are accordingly directed to consider the represenlation of the petitioner dated 21-8-2006 (Annexure P-14) on its own merit within a period of four weeks from the receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. With the above-stated observation, tfais petition stands disposed of. No order as to eosts. Certified copy as per ndes. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge J