:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1304 OF 2006 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 M/s. Natu Satkar Associates. ..Applicant. Vs. Mahesh Jagtap and anr. ..Respondents. Mr.S.A.Bhagwat for the Applicant. Mrs. A.A.Mane, APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 22nd July, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocate for the applicant. The respondent has chosen to remain absent though served. On hearing arguments of the applicant, I find that there are arguable points. The question is whether accused has rebutted presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act that the cheques were not issued in lieu of legally enforceable debt. Hence, leave granted. Office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 1. Though the appeal is not on board, papers are before me. As the leave has been granted by a separated order passed today. Hence, appeal admitted. Office to number the appeal. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)