IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9314 of 2010 Date of decision: 05.05.2011 Rur Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. J S Brar, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. M S Sachdev, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 states that the prosecution evidence is complete; one of the defence witnesses having been examined and the matter is now fixed for defence and arguments on 06.05.2011. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No. 2, it would not be appropriate to pass any order at this stage. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the pleas as raised herein before the trial Court at the time of arguments. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 05.05.2011 mohan