-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.557 OF 1998 APPEAL NO.557 OF 1998 APPEAL NO.557 OF 1998 Nizamul Haq Mohamed Hasan ...Appellant vs. Iqbal Suhail Siddiqui ...Respondent Mr.K.L.Ganesh Rao i/b Mr.Dinkar Rao for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 7,2008. : AUGUST 7,2008. : AUGUST 7,2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. As the First Appeal is disposed of by this Court in terms of the agreed consent terms, office has placed this Appeal before this court. In clause (2) of the consent terms, it is stated that the Court Receiver has been appointed in Bombay City Civil Court Suit No.7525 of 1987. The learned counsel for the Appellant has placed on record a letter dated 30th January 2008 sent by the Court Receiver recording that the Court Receiver has been appointed in Bombay City Civil Court Suit No.2203 of 1987. The prayer of the counsel for the Appellant is for permitting correction of Clause (2) of the consent terms for incorporating the correct number of the suit. He states that a notice has been duly served to the Advocate for the Respondent. 2. In view of the letter dated 30th January 2008 sent by the Court Receiver, the amendment/correction will have to be -2- permitted. 3. Accordingly, the Appellant is permitted to correct the clause (2) of the consent terms for incorporating the correct suit number. After correction is carried out, the decree passed in terms of consent terms will also stand modified accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE