IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ?3 1° /2011. PETITIONER: Pramod Kuinar Shukla, son of Late Kuka Ram Shukla, aged about 50 years, working as Head Master, Govt. Prunary School, Janinipali, N.T.P.C. Korba, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Tribal wetfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Asst.Commissioner/TribalWelfare Department, Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Eklucation Officer, Korba, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Du-ector, Treasuiy and Accounts, Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^--^^ "s:.^. •aaSSj •n 'i^^-^i )jnaie_Bench:_Hon'b!e Shri_Manindra Mohan Shriyasfava, J. !TIS iTinMF! Pramod Kumar Shu-kii Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others ;LE 22S OF THE Oc ;hrl Harish Khuntiya, counsel for the petitioner. ihri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State. (P3! >?ti1 The petit'oner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay of .10-9/-. After comp!etion of his probation period, he was granted regular pay ileofRs.169-300/-. 2 . Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue invofved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scate wifh effect from the date of initia! appointment or after completion of probation 3. The issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State »dministrativeTribuna!, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/89 Yadu 58 Others v. ofM.P. & others), wherein it was heid that the simi!ar!y situated teachefs are entltled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initlai *^ appointment. The matter was taken up fo the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphoiding the decision of Z-- the Trlbuna! to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie from the date of initia! appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sal Ram & Others v. of Chhattisgait & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006, by order dated 01-09-2006. aliowed the petitioners to make a representation wit'nin a period of ten days, raising a!! She grievances. Accordingly, fhe petltioner is granted iiberty to make a representation raising ail grievances in iight of the aforestated jud'gment and order dated 27-12-2008 (Annexure P-2) and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of recespt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge l unsne