IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.403 of 2009 IN (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 10599/2007) ======================================================= 1. Raj Kishore Prasad Singh 2. Kaushal Kishore Singh 3. Kamal Kishore Singh All sons of late Rama Kant Singh, resident of village Tekanpura Bhusari Police Station – Nawkothi, District-Begusarai .... .... Appellants Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Manjhaul, District-Begusarai 5. Uma Mahto 6. Ram Nandan Mahto 7. Shiv Nandan Mahto 8. Ram Ratan Mahto 9. Akildev Mahto 10. Lalan Mahto 11. Phuleshari Devi 12. Monia Devi 5 to 12 are sons and daughter of late Bhatu Mahto resident of village- Tekanpura Bhusari, P.S.- Nowkathi, District-Begusarai 13. Gopal Mahto, son of Sri Uma Mahto, resident of village Tekanpura Bhusari, P.S.-Nawkathi, District-Begusarai ….. Respondents ======================================================= Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Choudhary Shyam Nandan, Advocate Mr. Dronacharya, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 5 to 13 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, No.1, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Pawan Kumar Mishra, G.P.-22 Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, A.C. to G.P.22 ======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. T. MEENA KUMARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. T. MEENA KUMARI) The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 17.02.2009 passed in Patna High Court LPA No.403 of 2009 dt.12-09-2011 2 C.W.J.C. No. 10599 of 2007 wherein the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that no material has been produced on the question whether the gift deed dated 09.09.1994 is genuine or not. The learned Single Judge has rejected the contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant that the revisional authority has not gone into the question of genuineness of the deed of gift dated 09.09.1994. We had an occasion to go through the original deed of gift produced before us by learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 to 13. From perusal of the original deed of gift, it appears that the stamps were purchased on 09.09.1994 and on the same day the gift was registered. No evidence is produced before us by the appellants to dispute such document. Under the above circumstances, we are of the opinion that the order of learned Single Judge needs no interference. Accordingly, the appeal stands rejected. Patna High Court Dated 12th September, 2011 Ashwini/NAFR (T.Meena Kumari,J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)