1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6711/2003 Kumbha Ram versus Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Ajmer and another. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. I.R.Chaudhary, for the petitioner Mr.Kuldeep Mathur, for the respondents. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 4th January, 2008. JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has raised the grievance about the electricity bill which according to the petitioner was higher. 3. The respondents have filed reply to the writ petition disputing factual aspects raised in the writ petition. 2/2 4. Since disputed questions of facts are involved in the present case, it is considered expedient to relegate the petitioner to the alternative remedy by way of a representation to the competent Settlement Committee constituted by the respondent – Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Accordingly, the petitioner shall make a representation to the said Settlement Committee in accordance with Rules and procedure laid down for that purpose and the said Settlement Committee is expected to consider the case of the petitioner after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to him within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation. 5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J. Item No.4 Ss/-