Criminal Revision No. 162 of 1992 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 162 of 1992 Date of Decision: 31.01.2008. Pamwi Tissues Limited, Chandigarh. …Petitioner Versus Rajinder Saggi …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: None Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Two cheques received by the complainant company, when presented to bank, were dishonoured. Company had instituted a complaint under Sections 415 and 420 IPC. On summoning the drawer of cheque respondent Rajinder Saggi, the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh, vide impugned order dated 2.5.1991, held as under:- “8. In view of above noted discussion, I hold that since the complainant has failed to prove its prima facie case to the effect that the accused has committed an offence punishable u/s 415 and 420 IPC, therefore, the complainant merits dismissal and is order accordingly”. Criminal Revision No. 162 of 1992 2 This finding was arrived at after discussing the evidence. The learned trial Court also came to conclusion that present complaint was filed as convenient route as complainant could not succeed in a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. I find no infirmity in the order of trial Court. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 31, 2008 “DK”