IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2007 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 15301 of 2007(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BHUVANACHANDRAN PILLAI, ANJALI BHAVAN, MULLANALLOOR, MARUTHIKUNNU, NAVAYIKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ATTINGAL REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ATTINGAL. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 15301 OF 2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Ext.P1: True copy of the 4 months temporary permit issued to the petitioner valid from 27-10-2005 Ext.P2: True copy of the regular permit application submitted by the petitioner dated 22-5-2006 Ext.P3: True copy of the proceedings of the first respondent dated 7-8-2006 Ext.P4: True copy of the temporary permit issued to the petitioner valid till 7-4-2007 Ext.P5: True copy of the temporary permit application submitted by the petitioner dated 8-5-2005 //True copy// es S.SIRI JAGAN. J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.15301 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of June 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the registered owner of stage carriage bearing registration No. KL-16/B 4651 which is being run on the strength of a temporary permit on the route Tholikuzhy-Attingal in the vacancy of KL-07 M 3733. The petitioner applied for regular permit in respect of the same since according to him the vacancy is permanent. The said application was placed before the 1st respondent R.T.A. 7-8-2006. However the same was adjourned directing the 2nd respondent to submit a report. The petitioner complains of inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in submitting the report and consequently on the part of the 1st respondent in disposing of the petitioner's application for regular permit. The learned Government pleader submits that the petitioner application would be considered in the next R.T.A. meeting . This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. S.SIRI JAGAN JUDGE es