CRM No.M-15466 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-15466 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.05.2011 Raman Dutta .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) This is a petition for anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.167 dated 09.04.2006 registered under Sections 279, 337 and 338 IPC at Police Station Faridabad Central, District Faridabad. The petitioner, as per the petition, was regularly appearing in the case from the year 2006 to 2009. But, because he fell sick, he could not appear on 10.09.2009 and that is why his bail bonds were ordered to be cancelled. Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner had regularly been facing the trial for three years and therefore, he should be granted the concession of anticipatory bail. I find that the present is not a case of petitioner's unintentional omission to appear in the case. The petitioner admittedly did not appear on 10.09.2009 and thereafter sat pretty till 03.05.2011 when he filed the petition for anticipatory bail before the Court of learned Additional CRM No.M-15466 of 2011 ::2:: Sessions Judge after a period of almost one year and eight months. In my opinion, present is not a case for anticipatory bail. Dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 19, 2011 sukhpreet