1 chs-31-s-2293-08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 31 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2293 OF 2008. Kaizer Taherbhai Lokhandwala. ..Plaintiff. vs. Ramesh Venugopal Pillai & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr. A. Z. Mukhtiar, for Plaintiff. Mr. S.C. Mangle, i/b. Swati Sawant, for Defendant No.5. Ms. Sulakshna Yadav, i/b. Pradip Shukla & Co., for Defendant No.7. Mr. Niteen K. Kamat, for Defendant No.8. Mr. R.S. Ghadge, i/b. Mr. Appa Saheb S. Desai, for Defendant No.9. Mr. Shadab Peerzade, i/b. Munir Merchant, for Defendant No.10. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY 2011. P.C. By consent of the parties, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. The Advocate for the Plaintiff shall also carry out necessary amendments in the copies of the Plaint which are already served on the Defendants. 2. The Chamber Summons is accordingly, disposed of. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]