1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.591 OF 2007 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.308 OF 2008 Gopaldas G. Wadhwa. ..Petitioner V/s. Pashak Poly Products Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.592 OF 2007 Ramesh G. Wadhwa. ..Petitioner V/s. Pashak Poly Products Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.676 OF 2005 Kavita Nagpal. ..Petitioner V/s. Pashak Poly Products Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.677 OF 2005 Mr.Madhu Salgaonkar. ..Petitioner V/s. Pashak Poly Products Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.Vinod K. Sharma for Petitioner. Mr.V.Kanojia i/b. Kaushik Kothari for respondent. Mr.S.Ramakanta, Dy. O.L. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2008. : OCTOBER 18, 2008. : OCTOBER 18, 2008. 2 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. In terms of the Order dated 28th August, 2008, advertisment regarding proposed withdrawal has been published. In all these Petitions, Office remark indicates that no claim either way has been received inspite of the said publication. In view of the Consent Terms filed in all these matters, Petitions are disposed of on the basis of the Consent Terms tendered in the respective Petition. Ordered accordingly. 2. The amount deposited by the Petitioner in this Court pursuant to the Order passed by the Court be refunded to the Petitioner, if application is submitted to the Registry in that behalf. Ordered accordingly. 3. In view of this Order, nothing survives in Company Application. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)