IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16635 of 2010 RAGHO MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act is that as per the allegation itself, he was not apprehended on the spot and therefore the question of any recovery from his possession simply does not arise. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikarahana East Champaran in connection with Ghorashahan P.S. Case No. 136 of 2009. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)