IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA COMPANY PETITION NO. 11 OF 2010 INDIA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED ... Petitioner Versus ENERCON (INDIA) LIMITED ... Respondent Mr. Sudin M. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 25th March, 2011 P.C.:- When the company petition was placed for admission, a preliminary objection is raised by the respondent Company to the effect that its Registered Office is situate at Plot No.33, Daman Patalia Road, Bhimpore, Daman - 396210 and its Corporate Office at Enercon Tower, A-9, CTs no.700, Veera Industrial Estate, Next to Bhagwati House, Veera Desai Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai - 400053. Therefore, this Court at Goa will have no territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the petition. The Registered Office being situate in the Union Territory of Daman, it will be the main seat at Bombay which will have the territorial jurisdiction. 2. Mr. Usgaonkar appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that when the petition was initially filed at Bombay, the Bombay Registry did not register it because it was of the view that the High Court at Bombay had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the petition, but it must be filed at Panaji, Goa. 3. Now, an objection has been raised that the petition should have been presented at Bombay. 4. Having perused the affidavit-in-reply and considering the location of the Registered Office and the Corporate Office, it would be the principal seat at Bombay, on its original side, which alone will have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the petition. The petition be returned for presentation to High Court, Original Side, Bombay. 5. The Registry at Panaji, Goa to take all necessary steps and return the petition to the Petitioner's Advocate for presentation at Bombay. All concerned to act on the basis of authenticated copy of this order. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ssm.