wp9044-10 (1) agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9044 OF 2010 Smt.Vimal Padmakar Kamble .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Sagar Joshi for the petitioner. Ms.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P for respondent No.1-State. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : 30th November 2010. P.C.: . By way of this petition, the petitioner is challenging the action of the respondent No.3 in accepting the nomination papers of respondent No.4- Candidate. Since the remedy available to the petitioner was to file election petition challenging the action of the respondent No.3 accepting nomination form of respondent No.4, this petition is not required to be entertained and cannot be entertained. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not know whether any election petition is filed or not. Even if limitation period has expired for filing election petition, it is no ground for entertaining this petition. Hence, writ petition is rejected. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J) (P.B.Majmudar, J)