IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 16184 of 2006 Between: M. Raja, S/o. Mani, H.No. 1/49, Madhavaram High Road, Red Hills, Chennai - 51. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Civil Supplies) Prakasam District at Ongole. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Prakasam District at Ongole. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in seizing the rice belonging to the petitioner while transporting the same from enroute the State of Andhra Pradesh at Ongole, Prakasam District, as being arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, without jurisdiction and contrary to the Notification of the Central Goverrnment dated 15-2-2002 and the orders of the State Government issued in GO Ms. No. 79, dated 29-6-2005, and issue a consequential direction directing the respondents to forthwith release the seized rice in favour of the petitioner and pass such further or other orders as deem fit and proper Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.16184 of 2006 ORDER: 1 Counsel for the petitioner is absent. Learned learned Assistant Government Pleader states that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2 In the light of the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________ 07.10.2009 kvsn