IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 6141 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.09.2011 ________________________________________________________________ Kulwant Singh. .....Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. .....Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. ________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. AG, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for respondent No. 3 V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). Office order dated 24.09.2010, Annexure P-3, whereby the petitioner was transferred from Parwanoo to Dharampur is under challenge in the present writ petition. By virtue of an interim order dated 07.04.2011, passed in connected Writ Petition, being CWP No. 7038 of 2010, titled Kulwant Singh vs. State of H.P. and others, the petitioner is still continuing at Parwanoo. It is stated on behalf of respondent No. 3 by its counsel, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, at the bar that the petitioner shall be allowed to continue 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. ...2... at Parwanoo, in view of the aforesaid order dated 07.04.2011. Such arrangement shall also be subject to the final outcome of CWP No. 7038 of 2010. 2. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to permit the petitioner to work at Parwanoo in terms of this judgment. (V.K. Sharma) Judge 22nd September, 2011 (virender)