IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 2022-M of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : 15.03.2007 Balbir Kaur and others .... PETITIONERS Versus State of Punjab and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate, for Mr. S.S. Goraya, Advocate, for petitioners No.1, 2 and 4. Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. Mr. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate, for respondent No.2-complainant. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 138 dated 4.10.2006 under Sections 447/324/323/ 326/325/148/149 IPC, registered at Police Station Quadian, District Gurdaspur, have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of anticipatory bail. On January 18, 2007, while granting interim anticipatory bail to petitioners No.1, 2 and 4, subject to their joining investigation, petition qua petitioner No.3 was dismissed as withdrawn. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for petitioners No.1, 2 and 4 contends that petitioners No.1, 2 and 4 are alleged to have caused simple injuries to the injured and they have been falsely implicated. He further states that in terms of the interim order dated January 18, 2007, petitioners No.1, 2 and 4 have joined Crl. Misc. No. 2022-M of 2007 -2- the investigation. The State counsel, after having instructions from Sukhjinder Singh HC, does not dispute this fact and further states that these petitioners are no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits, the interim bail, granted vide order dated January 18, 2007, is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. March 15, 2007 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE