IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 860 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 9, 2010 Harmail Singh. ….Petitioner Versus Jagraj Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Lal Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D. Anand, J. Defendant – petitioner has challenged the order dated 09.01.2010 vide which his evidence was ordered to be closed by the learned Trial Court. It is noticed in the impugned order itself that the petitioner herein had been, in all, afforded five effective opportunities to conclude his evidence. The order regarding closure of evidence came about on the date the matter was fixed for recording of the defence of the defendant with clear understanding that it was the last opportunity. No witness was present in the Court on that date. The costs of adjournment imposed on the preceding date had not been paid. C.R. No. 860 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to indicate that there is any factual inaccuracy in the facts noticed in the impugned order. In the light therefore, the petition is completely denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. February 9, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2 C.R. No. 860 of 2010 3