IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2424 of 2008() ------------------------------ CRA.489/2005 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM ST.167/2003 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, TRIVANDRUM .................... REVN. PETITIONERS: APPELLANTS/ACCUSED ------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S JAY INJFO SYSTEMS (P) LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE AT ESSAR PLAZA, SREEKARYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR P.S.JAYAKUMARAN NAIR 2. P.S.JAYAKUMARAN NAIR, MANAGING DIRECTOR JAYA INFO SYSTEMS (P) LTD., WILLS BUILDING, TECHNO PARK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT JAYASUDHA, PNRA 6, PONGUMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SRI.DIPU.R SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW SRI.K.S.HARIDAS RESPONDENTS : RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. V.J.AJI,S/O.LATE GURUDASAN, DETH NIVAS, T.C.41/181(1) KNA 165, VALIYAPATTANAM LANE MANACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.2424 of 2008. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14th day of December, 2009. O R D E R The second revision petitioner was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram in ST.No.167/2003 for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months and a fine of Rs.5,000/-. The revision petitioners were also directed to pay Rs.37,500/- to the first respondent as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In Crl.Appeal No.489/2005, the IInd Addl.Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, while confirming the conviction, the substantive sentence to the 2nd revision petitioner was reduced to imprisonment till rising of the court. It appears that it was wrongly mentioned in the judgment of the appellate court that the substantive sentence was awarded Crl.R.P.No.2424 of 2008. -: 2 :- against the first revision petitioner and it was reduced to imprisonment till rising of the court. Compensation awarded by the trial court was converted as fine and compensation was ordered to be paid out of fine. Now this revision. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that the revision petitioners are seeking only time to pay the fine. Recording the submission, this revision petition is dismissed. The revision petitioners are granted six months time to remit the fine. Till then, the bail bond executed by them shall remain in force. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. Kvs/-