1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7835/02 Kana Ram Jat & Ors. vs. State & Anr. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1022/01 Khushi Ram & Ors. vs. State & Anr. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2939/2000 Badri Lal Jat & Ors. vs. State & Anr. 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1488/01 Gopal Lal Dhakad & Anr. vs. State & Anr. Date of order : 18/3/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Hemant Gajraj for the petitioners. Shri N.A. Naqvi, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents. ****** Heard learned counsel for the parties. Controversy raised in these petitions is covered by division bench judgement of this Court in Prashant Vohra & Anr. vs. State of Raj. & Ors.-2005 (1) WLC (Raj.) 264, wherein it was directed by the division bench that the appointment of the appellants whose recruitment was initially stayed by the respondents but later on was allowed in consolidated salary of Rs.1200/- per month, cannot be justified. It was directed that the appellants shall be given the notional benefits of regular pay scale from the date of their initial appointment till they were 2 granted regular pay scale by the respondents themselves. Learned counsel for the petitioners has cited similar judgement passed by coordinate bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4263/2004, Anil Chasta & Ors. vs. State & Ors. Decided on 25.02.2005. It is contended that the judgement of division bench of this Court in Prashant Vohra, supra was upheld till Supreme Court as the SLP filed by the respondents was dismissed. In view of above, these writ petitions are allowed in the terms indicated in Prashant Vohra, supra. The petitioners should also be entitled for notional benefits of pay till they were actually granted such scale of pay by the respondents. Compliance of the judgement be made within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this judgement is produced before the respondents. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/