IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1314 of 2008 RAMANAND CHOUDHARY Versus MOST.PREM LATA DEVI & ORS ----------- 2. 20.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order allowing addition of party, the intervener, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the land in question was purchased by the petitioner from the uncle of the intervener and therefore, when the uncle was already made party to the suit there was no necessity for the court below to allow intervention of the intervener. From the order of the court below, it appears that the land in question is not only recorded in the name of the intervener but he still is continuing in possession. In that view of the matter, if the court below has considered this aspect and has found the presence of the intervener to be necessary for disposal of the suit, the same cannot be interfered by this Court as enshrined under section 115 C.P.C. 2 Accordingly, this civil revision application is wholly without merit and the same is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/