IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 13867 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.K.BALAN,AGED 53 YEARS,S/O.KANNAIPPAN, KAAZHANTHA HOUSE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT,PRESENTLY WORKIG AS C.L.R.WORKER, CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY,CHAVAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,MUNICIPAL OFFICE,CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 4. THE SECRETARY,CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHAVAKKAD,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R3 & 4 BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN,SC,CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY FOR R3 & 4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13867 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The inaction on the part of the fourth respondent to take action pursuant to Ext.P5 judgment is what is complained of in this writ petition. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 3 and 4 has obtained instruction and nothing satisfactory is forthcoming from him to contradict the grievance raised by the petitioner. 3. Evidently, Ext.P5 judgment shows that fourth respondent has to take action in the matter. But this has not been done. Therefore, there will be a direction to the fourth respondent to take action consequential to Ext.P5 judgment. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE. nj.