:1: bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2031 OF 2010 M/s.Harsha Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.A.V.Anturkar a/w. Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude i/b. S.G.Deshmukh for petitioners. Mr.M.I.Sethna, Senior Advocate with Mr.J.B.Mishra for respondents. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE : 12TH APRIL,2010 P.C. Heard. Perused petition. 2. During the course of hearing, Mr.Sethna submits that, this is not a case, wherein this Court should intervene at this stage of the show cause notice, since the Revenue is inclined to adjudicate upon the show cause notice within a period of four weeks from today. 3. In view of the above statement of Mr.Sethna, Mr.Anturkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition keeping all his contentions open. While making this statement, he submits that, considering the onset of early monsoon, certain repairs to the barges would be necessary to protect it. According to him, once the monsoon starts, it would not be possible for the petitioners to carry out any repairs which would be necessary to protect the barges. :2: 4. Mr.Anturkar further submits that the petitioners would approach the Committee well within time, which has already been constituted and apply for repairs, which the Committee shall be entitled to consider on its own merits, considering the necessity of repairs, as may be necessary, with expeditious dispatch at any rate within 4 to 5 days from the date of receipt of the application. 5. Mr.Sethna has no objection to follow the mode suggested by Mr.Anturkar. 6. In the above view of the matter, statement made by Mr.Sethna in relation to the period of adjudication of show cause notice is taken on record. Mode of carrying out necessary repairs as suggested by Mr.Anturkar is also accepted without prejudice to the rights of the rival parties. This arrangement or repairs shall not create any equity in favour of either of the parties. All rival contentions on merits are kept open. 7. In the result, petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed in terms of this order. No order as to costs. (K.K.TATED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)