'^ HIGHCQURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBlLASPUR DIVISIONBENCH 'c ^. CORAM: HON'BLEtHRIRAJEEVGUPTA.GJ. HON'Bl.ESHRjSUNtl-KUIVIARSlNHA,J. ADpellants Applipants IVIisc. Abpeal No. 742 of2004 Smt Harbhajan Kaur, ^Vd/o Late Darshan Singh(Dead) •LRs ;-,.:..-/'ll'll'.:lf . 1 Manjeet Singh, S/o late Darshan Sjngh,Agedabtou27years 2 Sukhvinder Singh S/o Late Darshan Singh,Agedabtou;22years Both R/o Jagatpur, Ward NO,4/1Q5, Rai9arh(CG) i VEjRSUS 0 :;=«: .'.M1 m- ReSpondents Non-appiicants I.BanmaliS/oNotKn^ BUS Drh^r, Bus No. O.R.N.. 7455, 0/0 Nand Kishore Bus Service, Sundergarh (Orjssa)! 2. Napd Kishore Jaiswal, Bus Qwrier Np. p.R.N.. 7455, Radheyshyam Bus Service, DistriGt Sundergarh (Orissa) . 3. Njational Ihsurance Co. Ltd QivisjonalOfficelVtGToad.Raipur (Chhattjsgarh) 4. NishikanfrAgnihotri,Tryck Owner MII-7272,R/oBusStand Dharamjaigarh, DistrictRaigarh, 5. The Orieotal Insuranee Q<? Ltd;, BrahchOffice, itwariBazar, RaigarH IVSisc.AoDealunderSecfion 173x>ftlielV16torVel"ticlesAct msKV •2tf ^ •^ '."^' c padma ;-A; .i^. w Present: None for the appellants. Shri Anand Gypta, counsel on behalf of Shri Raj Awasthi,counselforrespQndentNo.3. ShriTarun Dadsena, counselforrespondentNo.5. ORDER (23rd September, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As thet-e is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) Theappeal, therefore, is dismissed forwant ofprosecutjon. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge