IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1489 OF 2009 Satyavati Bhajipala Parautha Kendra Vikri Sahakari Sanstha & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.B.R.Deshmukh for Petitioners. Mr.S.S.Pakale with Mrs.Geeta Joglekar for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : AUGUST 12, 2009. P.C. : 1. An order of the Division Bench of this Court passed in a group of matters being Civil Writ Petition (L) No.2755/2008, etc. – Samata Kurla Mahila Vividh Karyakari Sarvaseva Sahakari Sanstha Pvt.Ltd. vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Anr. dated July 23, 2009 has been brought to our notice, wherein, Petitions filed by similarly placed Petitioners were dismissed. 2. We have no reason to defer with the view taken by the Division Bench. With respect, while following the reasoning, we dismiss this Writ Petition. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners however contended that the order being a non-speaking order, should be set-aside and further the Petitioners would be willing to execute the terms of the tender even for remainder period of three months. We find no merit in this contention because the Petitioners lodged the Petition on 23rd December 2008 and did not even get it listed till April 2009. If that be the interest of the Petitioners, we see no reason to interfere in the present case, as the tender itself is ending on November 2009 and the Corporation has already been directed to invite fresh tenders. 4. Counsel for the Corporation submits that if the tender of the Petitioners submitted in future, satisfies the criteria and eligibility, that shall be considered in accordance with law if the Scheme is continued. 5. Petition disposed of accordingly. 6. Counsel for the Petitioners undertakes to remove office objections, if any, within one week from today. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.