1 APEAL.142-91 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 142 OF 1991 Shankar Bhiva Kamble & Ors. ...Appellants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. ---- Mr. Ranjit R. Bhonsale, for the Appellants Mr. P.S. Hingorani, AP.P. for the State. Mr. B.R. Patil, for Respondent No.2. ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 07, 2011. P.C.:- 1. The matter is before the court for speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 16.11.2011. 2 It is submitted that there is a typographical error in paragraph 2 of the order, wherein it is wrongly mentioned that accused no.7 has expired instead of “accused no.8”. 2 APEAL.142-91 3. The said order is accordingly modified. In paragraph 2 of the said order in place of the words “accused no.7”, the words “accused no.8” are substituted. 4. Today, accused nos.3 and 7 are present. Similarly, the son of the deceased is also present in the court. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that relationship between the parties are now cordial. 5. Original death certificates of the appellant nos.1,4,5, and 8 are taken on record. (M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)