IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1066 of 2007 RAMAYAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 17.11.2008 Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is that one Daroga Rai who is the main accused in Marhowrah P.S. Case No.193/04 under sections 302 and 120B/34 of the I.P.C. is still at large. Learned counsel submits that at times the aforesaid accused is seen in the village as he comes to the village frequently. Learned counsel for the State submits that all possible actions, required in the case, have been taken. Final Form has been filed and thereafter the police has requested the court for issuance of process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. In para 8 of the counter affidavit I find that the Superintendent of Police even has initiated departmental proceeding against S.H.O. and a request has also been made for reopening the case. I find that the S.P. has taken all steps, required in this case. However, in case the petitioner sees and come to know that the aforesaid main accused, Daroga Rai, is moving in the village or neighbouring village he may at his ends also inform the I.O. and the S.P. of the District who will take immediate steps for arresting him. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.) 2