IN THE HIBH COURT OF JUDICftTURE JftBALPUR. Writ F'etition No 3 /2000 Raju Rao Rangari S/o Shri.K-K. Rangari, aged about ii6 years , Occupation Service posted as ftssistant in M.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., presently stond dismissed from service, R/o Maaarpara.BILftSPUR, Uiit aii4u;.t(i.ill*li^*)iu"i«) Versus The Managing Director, M.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., BHOPAL. e'FITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTiaN INDIA FOR ISSUfiNCE OR A WRIT IN THE NflTURE QF CERTIORfiRI. MANDftMUS ftND PROHIBITION ETC. K: ii i' 1 •): Jli,iili li .esi' I,XtWK!2S;: »Biii ^.TsfRJJ^'iE^JlSplatSfl^t 3tj^l^ij^ sn^t . Srtl ^1^1' 5RI^I SSII®TI^I £^;'.'-l.-:,:23/aQ<^»t^ife^a:.'::::- 1; ^.»^Heai^^h:m?i.R^Ieev!;^hi^t'asN^y^rTieyr:.e petition^^^d»I^Ry3\^i^l^^RaB^K^i(^i,;';l^ Wspondent.' .'':,f: . ]•'. ' '^ ;.;:: ,. ; Return hgs heeBi fileGl. ; ^ It^has been argued that the apped befors^e IBocxrdof t5irectoifs. { j ^ ; Shri Rajeev Shrivastaw^^ j^ the ^petitioriep submits that q very important poir|t to the effect thiat at the rele<ttait time 1)18 petitioner wss veady p\«r •opNon' ';on^f,meiiit£^:'::t£t'5"l"he/a-wri^: •^ .^.•'•\ authori-ty by filing tt^proper appeal mdtter ori memt^ •tal^ri^jri'to -con m ^ petitioner^was Ct^^their'elevantll'imie ^I^MJI'i •Hi44^lf:^ t^^ •iT^t^TC ;' c:'^y '^3:iN?^sn^t;" :-,, wrjt petitioner ought to hove filsdlon burcleried with extremely iieavy wflfk was not.takeTi jn1^ considerWioft^^ 161+ie learned counsel jf this fdcf (lad been takeri irito CotisicleratiOlirjSli^ competent du+hor'ity wpuld haYeo^nled^teser punisb petjtipner wus foyrld ,gyi]ty. ^ < 5 5inee;1+iene^Js cn cgpellffi^ m t"ii;KI asiis "iif":^ (petitioner ^appr'oacl'! the appelfate^ wjthin; fifteen days ifrom today..i,©n receiptof oppeal itha^pellc^aultiori^sfaall pro ^ideration ^ ttie' fac't' that thfe; torrl- e?<Tt''emiE!|ylover', burelenecl^wi^|'ie|c»;y': 'ws : tl^l I E 'S •t;''i:!N^ii) "!•• ' V •••'i4 work, and ^e appea .taedi^ose^ |;:;.:;tl^Tdtrte:^lRlir^;ctfg)ie;app^.!g^'^^^ ^'..f^. '^^[W5/lig%i^ •18 fffl :PI 3TI^I'?.T r<-fi=* 3)it?r sfriifl^ -M{ifl ^vvl an^r^ra? (^qi^si^T) sn^t'FraiWtfe Ranj4n Shri Vivek respondent, submits that^ was extremely over burd^ned Let the appellate matter. Since I have appellate authority, the d^l With the above ob| Certified CODY of ti +l''<Ii'l'i<l-l tITO?ff ^ fS'St tfSR3H" ^sipgiran^i Tiwari, Learned counsei _for the the writ petitioner's contention that he is not borne out by the record. authorit/ examine every aspect of the that cm appeal be filed before the ^lay, if ony, shall stond condoned. dir^cted ~J^ |!S orc!ep»i?eqwen as per rules. ^sw^ Sd/- Chief Justice ^? •s^Ss^