IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2009 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 2481 of 2009() ------------------------------------ CRIME NO.203/2009 OF POTHANICAD POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED : ----------------------------- SAMAD, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, ILLIKKAL VEETTIL, LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY, KADAVUR VILLAGE, PANAMKARA KARA, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT : ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POTHANICAD POLICE STATION, POTHANICAD. (INVESTIGATING OFFICER IN CRIME NO.203/2009) REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682031. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 2481 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of May, 2009 ORDER The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.203/2009 of Pothanicad Police Station. The case was registered alleging offences under Sections 511of 376 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner, a neighbor of the defacto complainant in Laksham Veedu Colony attempted to commit rape on the defacto complainant at midnight, when her husband was not available. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the neighbors of the defacto complainant who came to the scene of occurrence saw the petitioner running from the house of the defacto complainant. 4. I do not think in the nature of the allegations and facts and circumstances of the case, this is a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm