1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 5076/2010 Tarachand Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP 26.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Amit Singh Shekhawat - for petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. It is stated that husband of the complainant has already been granted bail pursuant to the provisions of section 437 CrPC. Petitioner is father-in-law, who resides separately and has falsely been implicated in the matter. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner is entitled for grant of bail under section 438 CrPC. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking 2 to the facts of this case, I am inclined to allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Kathumar , District – Alwar is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Tarachand in FIR No. 52/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 498-A and 406 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma