IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6263 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 04, 2011 Bimaljit Kaur alias Paramjit Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. Gurpal Singh .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 19.9.2011 (Annexure P4) passed by the trial court. The trial court would seek a report from the Local Commissioner as to why the witnesses could not be examined within the stipulated time i.e. one month from 19.9.2011 till today. On showing his inability to record the evidence, the court would take the case back and itself complete the evidence of the defendant within three months positively. The court, first of all, would call the list of witnesses, ask for depositing diet money, PF and their correct addresses and then on failure to produce such witnesses, the court would proceed in accordance with law. Disposed of accordingly. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. November 04, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge