FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 29438 OF 2005 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3922 OF 200 PETITION NO. 3922 OF 200 PETITION NO. 3922 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 260 OF 2006 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 29442 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Anant Laxman Nikam - petitioner in person present. Representative of Union of India- present. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,JJ. MHATRE,JJ. MHATRE,JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 30TH JUNE,2006 30TH JUNE,2006 30TH JUNE,2006. P.C. 1. In C.A. No.259 of 2006. Heard applicant in person. C.A.No. 259/06 is allowed for the reasons mentioned therein. Delay of 195 days is condoned. 2. In C.A.No.260 of 2006 Heard the applicant in person. Delay condoned for the reasons mentioned in the application. 3. Heard the petitioner in person on both the Review Petitions. The order of which review is sought was passed after considering the points raised in the main petition. There is nothing which was not considered on record which requires review of the order. Hence both the review petitions are rejected. ....