IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1961, 1962, 1964 to 1967 and 1975 of 2011 Decided on: April 6, 2011. 1. CWP No. 1961 of 2011 Nirmal Thakur Versus State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 1962 of 2011 Baldev Singh Versus State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 1964 of 2011 Satish Kumar Versus State of H.P. & anr. 4. CWP No. 1965 of 2011 Ghan Shyam Sharma Versus State of H.P. & anr. 5. CWP No. 1966 of 2011 Mohan Lal Versus State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 1967 of 2011 Arjun Dev Versus State of H.P. & anr. 7. CWP No. 1975 of 2011 Bimla Verma Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate (in all petitions except CWP No. 1975 of 2011) Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate (in CWP No. 1975 of 2011) For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status/regularization with all consequential benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court 2 rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file individual representation furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner concerned will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation. 3. These writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 6, 2011 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (BSS/pankaj) Judge.