IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 23RD BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 28360 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- SURESH P.B, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN, PANIPRA HOUSE, KONNATHADI (PO) IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DISTRICT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DT 685001. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE OFFICE, ADIMALY (PO), IDUKKI DT 685001. 3. MOHANAN, THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE OFFICE, ADIMALY (PO), IDUKKI DT 685001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28360 OF 2010 (T) ===================== Dated this the 14th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Apparently based on Ext.P4 report of the Village Officer, the P Form issued to the petitioner has been recalled and the 1st respondent has issued Ext.P3 show cause notice for cancelling the licence. On receipt of Ext.P3 show cause, petitioner has filed Ext.P5 reply. It is at that stage the writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings. 2. At this stage, in my view, what is required is that the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 show cause notice should be finalised by the 1st respondent. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to finalise the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 show cause notice in the light of the contentions raised by the petitioner in Ext.P5 and in accordance with law. This shall be done with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp