IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 15TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 24TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 27313 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. P.JANARDHANAN PILLAI, S/O PADMANABHA PILLAI, BINU BHAVANAM, PAIKKADE ROAD, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. INDU GOPAKULAR, W/O RAJEEV R. KRISHNAN, LATHIKA NAGAR, H.NO.0/1933-4, VATTIYOORKAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 013 BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C). No. 27313 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T No representation for either side. But having gone through the averments in the writ petition as well as the various documents produced along with the same I feel that the only relief which the petitioner can legitimately aspire for is a direction to the Corporation to dispose of Ext.P5 in accordance with law. Accordingly I dispose of the writ petition issuing the following directions. If Ext.P5 representation is pending before the respondent Corporation as the petitioner asserts, the respondent will consider the application in the light of the various grounds raised in the writ petition and take a decision and communicate the decision to the petitioner. This will be done at the earliest and at any rate within three weeks of petitioner producing a copy of this judgment and a copy of this writ petition before the respondent Corporation. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) ksv/- WP(C)N0. -2-