IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2009 (M/S) Km. Prabhjot Kaur and another. ….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …..Respondents. Mr. B. D. Pandey, Advocates for petitioners. Mr. K. P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no. 1 to 3. 15th June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: “A- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to issue a caste certificate of other backward class to petitioners. B- Any other order, which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. C- Cost of the writ petition may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.” However, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that since the caste certificate of other backward class has already been issued to the petitioner, the writ petition has now become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. In view of the aforesaid statement, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 15.6.2009 Rathour