IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2008 / 8TH MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1749 of 2007(S) --------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.631/2007 Dated 11/04/2007 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER ------------------------------------- T.JOHN ROSE, PROPREITOR, SREE BALAJI AGENCIES 36/2247, SANKOORIKKAL BUILLDING, KADAVANTHARA NEW ROAD, COCHIN 682 017. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR SMT.PREEJA. P.VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO 5 IN WA: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.L.MARAPANDIAN, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, TAXES, (H) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SRI. PAUL ANTONY, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. CC(C) NOS.1749. 3. SRI. KAMARUDDIN, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT), SALES TAX OFFICE, SPECIAL CIRCLE-1, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-18. 4. SRI. CHACKO, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-18. BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI VINOD CHANDRAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/01/2008 ALONG WITH COC NO. 1761 OF 2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------------------- C.C.(C). NOS. 1749/07 & 1761/07 IN W.A.NOS.631/07 & 638/07 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th January, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L. DATTU, C.J: The State being aggrieved by the Orders passed by this Court in W.A.Nos.631/07 and 638/07 dated 11.4.2007, has preferred S.L.P.(C).Nos.24325/07 and 24326/07 before the Apex Court and the same are pending for consideration. 2. In view of this development, for the present, we do not intend to take cognizance of these Contempt Proceedings. Accordingly, the Contempt Petitions are disposed of, however, with liberty to the complainants to approach this Court, if need arise in future. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk.