28 % 05.04.2011 Present: Mr. Neeraj Jain, Adv. for petitioner No. 1. Mr. Kalyan Dutt, Adv. for petitioner No. 2. Mr. M.P. Singh, AFP for the State with ASI Joginder Singh, P.S. Tilak Nagar. Crl. M.A. No. 4151/2011 (exemption) Allowed, subject to aU just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. + Crl. M.C. No. 1134/2011 * Petitioners were known to each other. They were living in the same locality. They were engaged in the cable business. Present FIR was registered on the complaint of petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 1 alleged that petitioner No. 2 got served upon him summons allegedly issued by a Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, in order to harass him. In fact, petitioner No. 2 has also filed a complaint before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi pra3dng therein that petitioner No. 1 be summoned, tried and punished for haying committed the offences under Sections 452/427/380/506/34 IPG. Now, petitioners have settled their disputes, inasmuch as, they want to maintain harmonious relationship in future. Terms of settlement have been recorded in Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified a the CompromiseDeed dated 2^^ April, 2011. Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, in the larger interest, FIR No. 69/2010 under Sections 464/466/468/469/471/473/474/476/506/109/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating thierefromare quashed, subject to petitioner No. 2 depositing a sum of ^10,000/- with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. Crl. M.A. No. 4152/2011 (stay) Disposed of as infructuous. A.K. PATHAK, J. APRIL 05, 2011 rb