IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 27540 of 2007 Between: Bollu Shailaja D/o.Ram Reddy R/o.Belluri village, Post Chanda (T), Adilabad Mandal, Adilabad District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra pradesh State Council of Higher Education for Admission into B.Ed.Course, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 2 The Convenor, ED-CET-2007, Andhra University, visakhapatnam-530017 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to participate in the B.Ed. admission counseling and not permitting her to prosecute B.Ed course in Biological sciences, Methodology basing her rank obtained in the entrance examination though the petitioner is fully eligible to prosecute B.Ed course as per the notification as illegal, arbitrary, unjust violation of principles of natural justice null and void and violation of articles 14,16 and 21 of the Ed.Cet 2007 notification and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the B.Ed counseling as per her rabk obtained in the entrance examination and permit her to prosecute B.Ed course in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SURENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: C.SUDESH ANAND(SC FOR APSCHE) The Court made the following : ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. It is clear from the material on record that the grievance of the petitioner was only with regard to the admission into B.Ed course for the academic year 2007-2008. Since the academic year was over long back and there was no interim order pending this writ petition, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date:01.05.2009 sj