IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6664 of 2009 SUNIL PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.04.2009 Jagdish/- Heard. Petitioner is accused for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named accused. He has been implicated in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Gajendra Pandit. Learned counsel for the State on perusal of the case diary which was called in Cr. Misc. No. 50454 of 2008 submits that during investigation, the material has came against the petitioner in connection with the alleged offence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.),