IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.15622 of 2000 Between: 1 S.Vishnu Kumar, S/o.Janardhan, R/o.H.No.11-9-650/1, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. 2 S.Rajkumar, S/o.Janardhan, R/o.H.No.1-9-650/1, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner, C.C.Building Complex, Hyderabad. 2 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chief City Planner, Town Planning Section, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, preferably a writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in insisting on submission of a certificate from Mandal Revenue Officer with respect to the petitioners property bearing House No.2-2-185/56/15 situate at Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad as arbitrary, violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to regularise the construction made by the petitioners with regard to their property bearing House No.2-2-185/56/15 situate at Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad and pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.15622 of 2000 ORDER: The only grievance of the petitioners is to consider their case for regularization of the construction made by them in respect of the property bearing house No.2-2-185/56/15 situated at Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad, without insisting upon production of a certificate from the Mandal Revenue Officer. A counter has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating that the petitioners applied for Building Regularisation Scheme announced by the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.419, dated 30-06-1998, vide application No.97/BRS/C3/H0/98 and the same was considered and approved vide Building Regularisation No.672/C3/2000, dated 20-06-2000 and, therefore, no cause of action survives in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. In view of the aforesaid counter, I am of the opinion that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 07-07-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}