—•^ IN_THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION1SLNO. -?:3^, OF 2006 PETITIONER Sunder Singh S/o Shri Dashrath -,*^' ^.....-".A^ - Singh, aged about 39 years, Occupation vMV.*f' -Assistant Teacher, Government ^-•r ^-w**"*-°' -<,»•°'' ^o....--"^....^"'Ye.fo..-""'""' Primary School Bhainan Tola, Block 9- Fp»wi»^rsi^- ^es"- ^yr Marwahi. District BILASPUR C.G. ..(^s^^" RESPONDENTS Marwahi, District BILASPUR C.G. VERSU S 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur 2. The Assistant Comn-iissioner, Tribal Welfare DepartmentBilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 3. Block Education Officer, Block Marwahi, District Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^_226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA FORJSSUE OF_AN APPROPMATE WRIT IN T3IE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR OIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC^ \'s HI6H COURT OF CHHATnSfiARH AT BVLASPWt SIN6LE B6NCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NBHOTRI. J. WRIT PETTTrON (S.) tsK>. 7365 OF 2006 Petitioner Sunder Singh versys Reseondents State of Chhatt-isgarh and others And WRIT PETITtON (S.^ N0. 7366 OF 2006 Petitioner Laxmi Procsad Tiwari versus Respondents State of £?»hatt-is9arhond others »- t-;l Pre%nt : Mr. Rakesh Pandey. counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Anupom Dubey, Panel Lcnwyer for the Stote/res^iondents. a esa ORWR (Passed on 4" t)ay of becember, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioners as wetl as for the State/respondents jointly aibrait that the fncl-s ond question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of YastManf Kwaar Bharadwaf vs. Mwrie^at Capatwtion. Owy WKI wwriiei^. _ -_-— ^• 5-- 4. In subse<^ent casss. i.e.. Writ Petition (5.) No.5862 of 2006 ^Heimmt Kwnar VishHwlsarwa vs. State of Chfiaftisgaph wid others) ond other connect-ed matl'ers, decided by this Court on 12-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Eeki<ation, Bhopal and -the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified •that the nomencloture of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as biploma in Education, i.e., t).Ed. Accordff^ly, the t>.Ed. Cert-ificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.%62 of 2006 {j-lemant Kwncv Vishwakarmavs. Staie of Chhattisgarh andoiher^ (Supro). For -the aforementioned reasons, -these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of 1+iis Court' in the matt'er of Yadiwant Kumar Swrodwsj (Supra), subject to ver-ification of •the fact as to whe-ther the petitioners hwe acquired D.Ed. Certificate at their own expenses <is per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 eaid further whether they have been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be pkiced on record in o+her connected writ petition. Sd/- Sadsh K.Agnihotri Judge 1 Z006C[I)MPJR-C696 Boblu •n