BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14553 of 2011 1 C.PRABHU, 2 R.ARUNKUMAR 3 M.MANIKANDAN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 Vs THE STATE REP BY' THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLIDAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.390 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.K.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Cr.No.390 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioners attakced the de facto complainant and also criminally intimidated him. The de facto complainant sustained only simple injury and after treatment, he has been now discharged. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would deny the above allegations. According to him, due to election motive, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.I have considered the above submissions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Having regard to the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitinoers, but with conditions: 6.Accordinvgly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 17/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV TRICHY 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLIDAM POLICE STATION,TRICHY DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. V.K.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.40053 rl/6c – 21.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14553 of 2011 Date :17/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/