. @hwk? IN TI-IE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(C.G) @L‘H W.P. No. 12003 / PETITIONERS : 1. Kuleshwar Patell, aged about 42 ye'ars, S/o. Shri Banshilal Patel, R/o. Near of Gajanan Mandir, .Purana Amapara, Durg, Tah. 85 Distt. Durg (C.G.) .Bhagwat Das Baghel, aged about 51 years,’ES/o. Shri K.R.Baghe1, R/o. Kolihamar Gurur, Tah. Gurur, Distt. Durg (C.G.) .Jaynandan Patel, aged about' 47 years, S/o. Late Shri Sitaram Patel, R/o. Maitri Nagar, Sundar Nagar, Raipur, Tah. 86 Distt, Raipur (C.G.). .Om Prakash Dewangan, aged about 34 years, S/o. ‘Shri Goparam Dewangan, R/ o. Quarter No. 54/1879, front of SchoolGround, ‘Rohinipuram, Raipur Tah 'and District — Raipur (C.G.) . State of Chhattisgarh, through Principle Secretary, Department of Revenue Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . ommissioner (Land Records), State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.). / f” WRIT PETITION UDNER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS‘ CERTIORARI ANDOR ANY OTHER COMMAD LI TURE. / N OF KE NA HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR 3 9 Wn't Petition No. 3241 of 2003 Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. JuStice Satish K. mumtri. Shxi Roop Naik, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the Resgi nts No. 1 and 2/ State. ORAL ORDER (22nd February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satlsh K. Agihotrl, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners want to Withdraw this petition, to which learned counsel for the Respondents has no objection. 2. In view of the foregoing, the petin'on is dismissed as Withdrawn. No order as to costs. 1 ‘ Satish K. AgnihotriE Judge Sd/- Bablu 1 oy fe Petitioners: Kuleshwar Patel & others Versus Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh & another