IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35753 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- L.JAYA PRAKASH, KONNAYIL, PULLICHIRA P.O.,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,KOLLAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, S.N.COLLEGE, KOLLAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 35753 OF 2008 (F) ==================== Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he retired as Senior Grade Lecturer from S.N.College, Kollam on 31st March 2008. It is stated that immediately thereupon the 3rd respondent has forwarded Ext.P1 to the 2nd respondent for finalising the petitioner's PF claims. Despite having received Ext.P1 and the enclosed papers, the 1st respondent has not so far passed orders on Ext.P1. This is the complaint in this writ petition. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent has forwarded Ext.P1 and the enclosed documents to the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent should have taken action on Ext.P1. Since it is the case of the petitioner that orders have not been passed as above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 if those papers have been received and are pending. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp