IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9234 of 2008 Between: Manepalli Mohan Rao S/o.Late Krishna Rao R/o.Shyamalanagar Rajahmundry, East Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub Divisional Magistrate/Sub-Collector Rajahmundry, East Godavari District 2 State of Andhra pradesh, rep.by Sub Divisional Magistrate Sub Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the first respondent in insisting that the petitioner should come down to his office at Rajahmundry to receive payment of the compensation ordered to be paid by this Hon`ble court in WP.no.21245 of 2004 as modified in WA.No.1424/2005 notwithstanding the danger to the petitioner safety from the police at Rajahmundry , is arbitrary and unreasonable and further directing the said respondent to pay the compensation without insisting on the petitioner personal presence at Rajahmundry and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.BALAGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 9234 of 2008 Oral order: Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in directing the petitioner to come down to their office to receive the compensation, directed to be paid by this Court in W.P. No. 21245 of 2004 as modified in W.A. No. 1424 of 2005, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. When the writ petition was taken up, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue produced cheque No.238860, dated 01.05.2008, drawn on State Bank of India, Rajahmundry, for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) and handed over the same to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner, having acknowledged the receipt thereof, submitted that no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. In view of the above, no further orders need be passed in the writ petition and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 02nd May 2008 KSR/Nsr