IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.938 OF 2005 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.939 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.2129 OF 2005 Smt.Anandi Baburao More ...Applicant Versus Shri.Sunil Gouru Darekar ...Respondent ...... Mr.Pratap V.Patil for Applicant. Mr.Sunil Gouru Darekar for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 13, 2006. JANUARY 13, 2006. JANUARY 13, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the facts stated in Para 3 of the reply affidavit, the question of showing indulgence to the Applicant as prayed in this : 2 : application does not arise. The statement made in the reply affidavit has not been controverted. Hence, this Application should fail. The same is dismissed. 3. Applicant to pay necessary Court fees within four weeks from today, failing which, Appeal shall stand dismissed. If court fees is paid in time, Appeal be registered. If there are no other office objections, appeal be listed for admission as per its turn. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.