IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.331 of 2008 1. JAMUN THAKUR son of Late Narayan Thakur 2. Buchendra Thakur 3. Brahmdeo Thakur - Both sons o Late Gangai Thakur 4. Tara Devi widow of Late Ananti Thakur All residents of Mauza – Meerjaba, PS Triveniganj, District Supaul………Plaintiffs -Petitioners Versus 1. JAGDISH THAKUR 2. Prem Thakur 3. Sudist Thakur 4. Domi Thakur - All sons of Late Subran Thakur 5. Bhageshwar Thakur 6. Jageshwar Thakur 7. Bateshwar Thakur -All sons of Late Lakshman Thakur -All residents of Mauza – Meerjaba, PS Triveni Ganj, District Supaul…….Defendants –Opp. Party 1st set 8. Bache Lal Yadav son of Late Jigeshwar Lal 9. Mostt. Jasima Devi widow of Late Parmeshwari Yadav 10. Surat Lal Sah son of Shri Chchedi Sah 11. Jageshwar Sah son of Raghunandan Sah 12. Surendra Singh son of Sri Balendra Narayan Singh 13. Kuji Lal Yadav son of Sri Kuka Mandal - All residents of Mauza _ Meerjaba, PS Triveniganj, District Supaul……..Defendants –Opp.party 2nd set ----------- 04- 30.7.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. The plaintiffs have filed this application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and challenges the order dated 20.11.2007, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge I, Supaul, in Title Suit no.104 of 2005 (Jamun Thakur v Jagdish Thakur), whereby the defendants’ application has been allowed and it has been held that the suit has abated in view of the 2 provisions of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act. We do not find fault in the impugned order. 2. This civil revision application is rejected. ( S K Katriar ) mrl