IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2011 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14213 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KAMALASANAN PILLAI, S/O.KARUNAKARAN PILLAI PULIMOOTTIL VEEDU, CHADAYAMANGALAM, CHADAYAMANGALAM P.O.,KOLLAM DIST BY ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM-691OO1 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM-691001 4. THE TAHASILDAR,TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKARA 691534 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691534 6. THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691534 7. THE CHADAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHADAYAMANGALAM P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT REP.BY ITS SECRETARY-691534 GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).14213/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 26th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner, the owner of 15.05 acres of land in survey No.179/15 in Block No.42 of Chadayamangalam Village, which is stated as a dry land, contends that no filling exercise has been pursued by him, after the commencement of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. However, at the instance of some neighbours, who have some enimity to the petitioner, the third respondent issued Ext.P4 notice dated 17.1.2011 referring to infringement of the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act. Immediately on receipt of such notice, petitioner preferred Ext.P5 reply dated 3.2.2011. However, the proceedings are still to be finalised, which made the petitioner to approach this Court for appropriate reliefs to have better and effective enjoyment of the property. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. After hearing both sides, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and pass final W.P.(C).14213/11 2 orders in the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4, taking note of the averments made by the petitioner in Ext.P5. This shall be done in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and others concerned, if any, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with the copy of the writ petition. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs