1 Cri. appln. no. 440 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 440 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 533 OF 2010 Avinash @ Pinya Ashok Jadhav ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms. Anjali Patil i/by Mr. Bharat Gaikwad for the applicant. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATED : JULY 12, 2011 P.C. Heard. The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 of I.P.C. and sentenced for life imprisonment. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the witness i.e. P.W. nos. 2 and 3 are not reliable witnesses and they have not seen the incident. That there are serious material omissions in their evidence. 2 Cri. appln. no. 440 of 2011 The applicant is a a young person. The appeal would take considerable time for the final hearing. Therefore, counsel prays for releasing the applicant on bail during the pendecy of this appeal. The learned A.P.P. Opposed the application. We have perused the records and proceedings. We have perused the deposition of material witnesses including eye witnesses Virendra Sasane and Nilesh There is recovery of weapon from the accused. The blood stained clothes were also recovered. Hence, no case is made by the applicant. The application for bail is rejected. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)