IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11124 of 2011 Mohan Prasad Jaiswal, S/o Late Daroga Prasad, resident of Miscott, P.S. Motihari Town, Dist. East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Secretary cum Director, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 5. The Motihari Municipality(Nagar Parishad), through its Chairman. 6. The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Motihari, East Champaran. 7. The Executive Officer, Motihari Municipality, Main Road Motihari, P.S. Chhatauni, Dist. East Champaran. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 3. 20.7.2011. Heard Shri Sangeet Deokuliar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rikesh Singh, learned A.C. to A.A.G.10, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4 and Shri Raghwa Nand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.5 to 7/Motihari Municipality (Nagar Parishad). The petitioner, who retired with effect from 1.4.2008 while functioning as Ward Jamadar under Motihari Municipality, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of his retiral dues such as difference of Gratuity, Leave Encashment, pension and difference of amount due to revise pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition 2 may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned by way of filing representation. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.7/Executive Officer, Motihari Municipality within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.7 is required to examine the same and pass order in its right perspective redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no.7 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing all the retiral dues of the petitioner within aforesaid time i.e. two months. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.7 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. It is made clear that petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. 3 With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)