THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3456 of 2011 DT.27.8.2011 Between: Atchyuta Venkata Subba Rao … Petitioner And Atchyuta Kamakshamma and another … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Srinivas Polavarapu Counsel for respondent: Sri The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3456 of 2011 O R D E R: Heard both the counsel. The petitioner herein who is the plaintiff filed suit O.S.No.10 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla against the respondents herein for partition of the suit schedule property. The petitioner is the son of the 1st respondent and brother of the 2nd respondent. It is stated that the petitioner herein also filed another suit O.S.No.56 of 2009 against the respondents herein and two others i.e., Venkateswara Rice Mills and Rama Rice Mills for partition of the suit schedule properties. It is not in dispute that the suit schedule property in O.S.No.10 of 2007 and O.S.No.56 of 2009 are different and distinct except the plaintiffs and the defendants 1 and 2 in both the cases. It is also not in dispute that the evidence in O.S.No.10 of 2007 is over and the suit is posted for arguments. At that time, the petitioner filed I.A.No.572 of 2010 in O.S.No.10 of 2007 for clubbing O.S.No.56 of 2009 to have a common trial in both the suits. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that there cannot be any common trial as the trial was already over in the earlier suit O.S.No.10 of 2007, however, he submitted that the hearing of the suit may be postponed for a period of eight weeks so as to enable him to lead the evidence in the other suit O.S.56 of 2009, as both the suits are pending on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, for expeditious disposal of O.S.No.56 of 2009, the petitioner is directed to complete his part of evidence within four weeks from today and the defendants within four weeks thereafter. There shall be stay of the disposal of O.S.No.10 of 2007 for a period of eight weeks only from today irrespective of the completion of the evidence, and for any reason the evidence and arguments are not completed in O.S.56 of 2009 within eight weeks from today, it is open for the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla to consider and dispose of O.S.No.10 of 2007, on its own merits, after hearing both the parties. The C.R.P is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (V. ESWARAIAH,J) DATE: 27.8.2011 grk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3456 of 2011 DATE: 27.8.2011