IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 01-03-2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Review Application No.102 of 2010 C.Jeevitha .. Petitioner Versus N.Gokulakrishnan .. Respondent. Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 read with Rule 1 and 2 r/w. Section. 114 of the Civil Procedure Code praying to review the order, dated 22.04.2010, made in Tr.C.M.P.No.118 of 2010. For Applicants : Mr.G.K.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.Jayaraman O R D E R The main ground raised by the petitioner in the present review petition is that it would be difficult for the petitioner to travel from perambur to Chengalpet, to attend the hearings in the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpet, in O.P.No.98 of 2009, as she is pursuing her studies in Bharathi Arts College, Mint, Chennai. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner had further submitted that the original petition, in O.P.No.98 of 2009, is not at the final stage of hearing, before the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpet as stated in the order of this Court, dated 22.04.2010, in Tr.C.M.P.No.118 of 2010. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner had also submitted that it would be equally difficult for the respondent to travel from Neelangarai to Chengalpet to attend the hearings, in O.P.No.98 of 2009. 4. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that there is no difficulty for the respondent to travel from Neelangarai to Chengalpet to attend the hearings, in O.P.No.98 of 2009. 5.In view of the fact that it is a settled position in law that the review jurisdiction of this Court is limited in nature, as held by the Supreme Court, in Inderchand Jain V. Motilal Jain (2009 AIR SCW 5364) and as this Court does not find sufficient cause or reason to review the order passed by this Court, in Tr.C.M.P.No.118 of 2010, dated 22.04.2010, this review petition stands dismissed. No costs. arr