IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.303 of 2008 AMRENDRA KUMAR JHA Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. BRAHMDEO PASWAN 3. PRAMOD PASWAN 4. BINOD PASWAN 5. SHARANDEO PASWAN 6. JYOTI @ JITENDRA PASWAN 7. CHADRADEEP PASWAN @ CHARANDEEP PASWAN 8. SARYUG PASWAN 9. GORELAL PASWAN 10. DINKAR RAM @ SINGH 11 ANIL SINGH 12.PRAMOD CHOUDHARY 13.PRAKASH CHOUDHARY 14 HARITAR CHOUDHARY 15.GOREL CHOUDHARY 16.CHANDAR PASWAN @ CHAMRU ----------- 2 27.11.2008 This revision has been preferred against the order of acquittal dated 4.2.2008 passed by the Fast Track Court No. V, Banka in Sessions Trial No. 563/94. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is a case of the year 1991. The opposite parties have suffered mental agony for more than seventeen years. On perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that material exhibits i.e. burnt articles were neither seized nor produced before the court to substantiate the allegation under Section 435 of the Indian Penal Code. There are other discrepancies also in oral evidence. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order of acquittal. This application is accordingly dismissed. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad) - 2 -