// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.387/2007 Mahesh Chand Khandelwal S/o Shri Shiv Pratap Versus Civil Judge (J.D.) Chomu, District Jaipur and Another Date of Order ::: 21.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Sumer Singh Shekhawat, Advocate, for Shri Rajeev Sogarwal, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The plaintiff-respondent No.2 filed a suit for eviction against the defendant- petitioner in respect of disputed premise. During the pendency of that suit the plaintiff- respondent filed one rent-note -cum- agreement along-with an application to take the same on the record. The defendant-petitioner contested the application and contended that the said document is unregistered and unstamped, therefore, it cannot be taken on the record. The trial court observed that the nature of the document will be considered and decided after recording the evidence of both the parties and consequently after reserving the right of the // 2 // defendant, took the said documents on the record and exhibited, vide order dated 20th December, 12006, which is under challenge in this writ petition preferred on behalf of the defendant-petitioner. I have considered the impugned order in the light of submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and, after considering the same, I do not find any jurisdictional error in the same so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//