&§\D’g/ @’ Singie Bench 1N THE HON'BLE HIGH couRT QF ¢HHATTI$$ARH AT BILA$PUR WRIT PETITION (g) No.‘l\°07 (2011 K PETITIONER :Kumari Jabarani Mandal aged about 27 years, daughter of Naren Mandal, Class III Shikshakarmi, Village P.V. 41, Pakhanjoor,‘ resident of P.V. 41 Pakhanjoor, District Uttar Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh i V vi VER$US 3:} I .«r’ g“ Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2 ”wirhe Coliector, Uttar Bastar, Kanker, C.G.), / RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The ( M 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Koylibeda , District Uttar Bastar Kanker, (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$TI- TUTION ¢F INDIA FOR I$$UANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI,ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION] DIRECTIONS ETC HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B!LASPUR WRIT PETlTlON (S) NO. 21 O3 OF 2011 Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 215‘ day of April, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that against the decision of the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Koylibeda, dated 13.1 0.2008, whereunder, the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner to the Collector, Kanker, on 16.12.2008 (Annexure P-4), till date no decision has been taken. Learned counsel does not want to press any other relief except to consider and decide the pending appeal of the petitioner. Shri Roy, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the appeal is still pending consideration, the same wili be considered and decided, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks. in View of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforestated observation. Sd/—' Ashok Satish K. Agnihotri Judge PETlTlONER Kumari Jabarani Mandel