IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.8899-M of 2010 Date of Decision:26.11.2010 Mohd. Latif and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. V.K. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Paul, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to official respondents to initiate action against private respondents in order to protect the life, liberty and property of the petitioner. Upon notice, reply has been filed submitting therein that there was a dispute between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.6. After due investigation SHO Police Station Bullowal, found that the applications submitted by petitioner No.1 and respondents No.4 and 5 were false and the same were recommended to be filed. It is the specific allegation of the petitioner that respondent No.3 is in fact was hand in glove with the private respondents. Thus, he does not expect justice at his hand. However, at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty file criminal complaint or avail of alternative remedy in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 26.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE