I3ST SSSS^SStW^^SsS^SSS^S^'1. '••: :iSS^S:'!'":!<~'•.. ~~;~t~'~' '-'• liaMBBBKiSWJWSKig'y^ Ii!lMI'811Ui8S!!3 rinaatN6Ega8aHgg8n SffltBBSWMal§ lllljjllIIIg[gl||i|l'|jigjj|l|||j||||j|g|g||gj||j|^ ll;IBSili;llftNffiilSUifflNWS8UBiU^BBKBBIfeS :J:llI8iy^ii3II;|ffist8ijKiWSNSBigS iMSBBIMIBiBJM f&WSS^sWSSSsSWtS^M :3SKijgig%g@gig|liggll^.l§;,;:::.^ M'WKBSUSUBSBIjlsBBJIBBSSKaM IRISSIMIINWISIBSIIKUIi^^ i^^ ffiN^ :K •{•^ y. -i'i •'• SSSiWsWisSiiiSWsB^S ;;'.5lS::Ua?ffiMBaSK%EBSIIWiW^®%;^ BSI^'MW^IISSIWS^ WN&:^lat)^''^ %ISi.'.';SBfS giKSg^®-CWN^KS® ^:^^ ;:..l';.s®airw: ^^•?'^^:^^li^.«""S:;;^;:f>ia8B*'B8<:SH'':l; iilll !!'li:l 'L.'^' :"aa E>L][,Staai ^®WffCTaa<i^l tiUiUffiSi-SBS-iilHSri ggiii|iBffi|gT|Ea»pr''iHHK; agau—Bi»MB.Gi3g»si ^ i8EI%liSlSiK8BNIiM^BBB^^BfiKK8BUSIiii®Ni^il :yB'sliB?Kil8KIIIM!BfiUBIIBBIS^^ IIK!SjRBSISBKBMNBBB^BI^MWB!aH!flEII^:'. 'iSS^ ir SB •^%i'^^?ci';;'?;S^Si^ ^^;^'^^^.:s'^^%^ ^£:?^^''^;e;:?S*^5r^ ^.^SS^SSa^.'""' ..";'?';S5'^?°'^.'. :':'"^:1 f: ''^•. ^;'^;^;p;^:^^K?S&^SSSKi%^SSSf^s^SS^^;%£, :^.-S<\-c^-r^< l'\ .'yh.^.i..'vwsb^-i ^ t A HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARHj BLLASPUR W. A. No. 284 pf 2007 AppeUaat Chandrashekhar Shendre Veisus Respondents The National Fertiljzeis Ltd. & others WRITAPPEALUNDERSECTON2(1) OFTHE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEALTO DrVISION BENCH1 A<*T. 2006 DB: Hon'ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'ble MB Prashant Kum.ar Mishra, JJ. •\ ^ v Shri Ashish Surana, Advocate for the appeBant. Shri P. S. Koshy, Advocate for the respondents Np. 1 & 2. ShriAmrito Das, Paael Lawyer forthe respondents No. 3 & 4. ORDERIorall ( Passed ontIus30dldayofMarch, 2010 ) 1. Heard leamed courisel appearing for fhe writ appeUaat as WeU as leamed counsel appearing forfhe respondents. 2. This writ appeal has been filed ^aiast the judgment aiid order dated 18.9.2007, passedby theleamedSiagle Judgeia W.P.(S)No, 5396/2007 ( Chaadrashekhar Shendre Vs. The Natioiial Fertflizers Ltd. & ofhers), dismissiag fhe writ petition; 3. Brief facts 9<f the case are fhat at the timc of appoiutment of the writ appeUant on the post of Assistaut Manager ia National FertiUzers Ltd., Pune, he had subiiu.tted a caste certificate showing fhat he belongs to Seheduled Tribe coininunity. The caste certi&Gate was purported to be issued by the Tahsildar, BOaspur. However, fhe Natioual FertUizers Ltd. verified titte caste eertitficate and t . • ::: . ftiereafter issued a show cause notice fhat fhe same wasfaike. The contention ofleacned counsel for fhe writ appeUant is tUat iu fact ^.8 ..( ;1 . i- ;-^.' 5. the writ appeUaat belongs to Scheduled Tribe and his matter is pending before the State Level Caste Scrutiuy Coiuiiuttee, We are notcoiicemed with the same. Only a show cause notice was issued agamst the writ appellant by the National Fertilizers Ltd. Pune agamst which he ffled the writ petition aad after disxnissal of the writ petition he filed the iustaat writ appeal. In the counter affidavit it has been aveired fhat a char^e sheet has been \ subinitted leveUmg only two cBa%es. The proceedings iuitiated by the writ appeBant before the State Level Caste Scrutiny Coinmittee has no concem with thls Court in the instaat writ appeal. • We find no inegality or unpropriety in thc inipugned order dated 18.9.2007, passed by the learaed Siagle Judge. The writ appeal is misconceived and is dismissed. No oider as to costs. Sd/- t.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Thakiir