IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29830 of 2011 Date of Decision: October 18, 2011 Prem @ Prem Rani & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Kamal Mor, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. None for respondent Nos.4 to 8. Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate, for respondent No.9. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Gist of the issue is recorded in order dated 29.9.2011. The order reads as under:- “Learned counsel contends that petitioner no. 1 is a widow and got married to petitioner no. 2. Respondent No. 4 to 9, however, are not happy with the arrangement and have not accepted the marriage and, therefore, are threatening the petitioners. Crl. Misc. No. M-29830 of 2011 [2] Notice of motion for 18.10.2011. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. Requisite number of copies of the petition be given to him during the course of the day. Respondents no. 4 to 8 be served through DSP Headquarter, Sonepat. Respondent no. 9 be served through DSP Headquarter, Bhiwani. In the meantime, in case the petitioners have any apprehension of serious threat, they would be at liberty to approach respondent no. 2 by way of a written application. Respondent no. 2 shall ensure protection of the petitioners. The petitioners and private respondents are directed to remain present in Court on the next date of hearing.” 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.9 states that the private respondents have accepted the marriage of the petitioners, and therefore, would not take law into their own hands so as to cause any harm to the petitioners. 3. In view of the stand of the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioners states that cause of action does not survive. 4. The petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (AJAI LAMBA) October 18, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?