1. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.566/2010 Nathu Lal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 18.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. B.N. Kalla, for the petitioner. ... This petition for writ is preferred to challenge the judgment dated 5.3.2008 passed by Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer affirming the judgment dated 19.6.2007 passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur. The Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur by order dated 19.6.2007 while exercising powers under Section 223 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 affirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Udaipur on 31.3.2003. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the courts below failed to appreciate that no evidence was considered by the original court before reaching at the conclusion that no trespass was made by the defendant- respondent. I have considered the argument advanced and also examined the orders impugned. 2. From the perusal of judgment dated 31.3.2003 passed by learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Kumbhalgarh, it is apparent that in presence of plaintiff and defendants the land in dispute was measured and that was made by the Tehsildar as well as by competent officers of Settlement Department. The Sub- Divisional Officer gave a definite finding by relying upon the reports submitted by the Tehsildar and the Settlement Department after making measurements of land in dispute in presence of the petitioners. In view of the factual position aforesaid, I do not find any wrong with the orders impugned that may warrant interference of this Court while exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Sanjay/ 3.