IT APPLICANT/ Petitioaer HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. 418 of 2010 Soninafh Kesharwaai, S/o Shri Pitam.bar Rrasad Kesharwani, aged about 3 1 years, R/o TV Tower, Chhoteuttarmuda, Raigarh, TahsU & District -Raigarh (C.G.). RBSPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. State of Chhattisgarh fhrough fhe Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S, Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). The Collector, Raigai'h, District- Raigarh (C.G.). Nazul Ofllcer, Raigarh, Distdct Raigarh (C.G.). Muiiicipal Corporation, Raigarh, Distdct Raigarh (C.G.), Joiat Dii'ector Towu & Country Plannmg, Raigarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.). Dhirija Bai, Wd/o Late Lahoram Dewar, aged about 80 years, R/o Sonuiauda, Raigarh, TahsU & District -Raigarh (C.G.). APPLICATION FOR CORRBCTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN ORDER DATED 02.08.2010. PASSED IN W.P. f Cl N0. 129 OF 2007. (SB :Hon?ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Preseilt:- Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Shri Avinash K. Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 1, 2, 3 8s 5. None for the respondents No. 4 65 6. ORAL- ORDBR (Passedon 16/08/2010) 1. Heard. 2. Petition for correction of typographical en'or in order dated 2/8/2010 passed iti W.P. ( C) No. 129/2007, record, copy of conceraed documents perused. ^^^ •^^, ^ /' ^ "^" % g-sa^j \s^/i /& 3. It appears fhat ia Paras-1, 5 ia stead of 17/3/05 it has been written as a 17/2/05 Ukewise in Para -5 m stead of 14/3/05 it has been written as 14/2/05, in Para-11 ia stead of 6/2/06 it has been written as 2/6/06, AU are typographical aad clerical errors. ConsequenUy, fhis petition is aUowed, Aforesaid dates are amended, 4. This M.C.C. is treated as a part ofW.P.( C). No.129/2007. 5. No order as to costs. 6, Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^