IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3425 of 2010 SUDARSHAN KAMKAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.03.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the State. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of bail in a case instituted under sections 304(B) and 201/34 IPC. On earlier occasion, his prayer for bail was considered and rejected by this Court under order dated 20.08.2009 (Annexure-1). Considering the submissions and the fact that he was in custody since 13.01.2009, this Court observed as under: “In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, for the present, is not inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. Prayer for bail made on his behalf is accordingly rejected.” Referring to the statements made in paragraph 18 of this petition, it is submitted that the wife of the petitioner, a co- accused of the present case, has been granted bail by this Court. It is next contended that the husband of the victim/deceased continues to be in jail custody In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Buxar in connection with Brahampur P.S.Case No. 10 of 2009 subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family members and that he - 2 - shall appear on each date fixed at the trial, failing which the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )