IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5738 of 2008. Decided on: 16.11.2010. _________________________________________________________ Chandrawati Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 4. None for respondents No.2 and 3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Case of the petitioner has not been considered by the respondents since she had attained the age of 35 years and her name has not been sponsored by the employment exchange. A Division Bench of this Court on same or similar facts has directed the respondents in CWP No.2453 of 1995, decided on 1st May, 1996 to consider the case of the petitioner dehors the policy decision for appointment on daily wages. The operative portion of the judgment reads thus:- “We are of the opinion that the cases of all the writ petitioners have to be considered sympathetically. We say so, as in view of the age bar, they will not be able 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - to get any employment in government service. Therefore, we direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners dehors the policy decision Annexure PA for appointment on daily wages. For this purpose, the petitioners shall file another representation(s) within two months from today, which shall be disposed of within two months thereafter.” 2. Petitioner’s case is at par with the petitioners, who had filed CWP No.2453 of 1995. Consequently, there shall be direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the judgment rendered by this Court on 1st May, 1996 in CWP No.2453 of 1995. The petitioner’s case shall be considered within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. She will not be entitled to any back wages in case she is offered appointment. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 16, 2010. (sck).