;-^?"^' 7:TT '^1^': 7'&Ti s^y, '3?fNr 1 '3-5( --li'-.'lfl'-i, ISTll'M'l'S. 1°1<'11'U'EP' 3?RSTTraqr(T}qt;I^ l^nw: •gfed SRT'?' •W?ff ^fSi?t (i'o|^s.K ^srl'roar^t Sinale Bench; H on'ble Justice Dhirendra Mishra P.fcl N0.2S09/200S (Petinon unaer fljrncie 226 ot Constrtutionof inaia] Mul'iimanohar, S/o Late Balram Singh Chouhan, ag^d about 59 years, R/o Sihariya Chovi/k Gali Ra-^anbhata, Bhatgaon, Raipur(CG) 1 1. jstate of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, iDeosrtmsnt of Revenue. D.K.S. BhawRn. jRaipur (CG) Vs 2. 3. £t. 5. 79 s 7nna ~he Inspector General (Slamp), Raipur (CG) The District Registrar, Reglstration Office, Durg (CG) Tt-s" C>i •\" 0-'."""t-"<- Q'.""S "*-"<••"" ''^ffi.'v- r^. !- i fic ouu-pit=;yi&Lidij rstsyibi.idliuii ^iiiUc, uuiy (CG) Surendra Singh @ Krishna Kumar Chouhan, S/o Late Balram Singh Chouhan, aged about not knon, R/o Motinagar, Boriyakhurd, Raipur (CG) Mr. P.P. Sahu, Adv.jforthe petitioner. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Go'Srt. Advocate for the State. Heard. ' Grievance of the petitioner is that he made complaint under Sections 81 & 83 of the Registration Act, 1908 making allegation against respondent No.4 & 5 that the document submitted by respondent No.5 for registration on the basis of forged power of attorney has been registered by respondent No.4 in collusion with respondent No.5. When no action was taken on the petitioner's complaint, he was constrained to file W.P. (c) No.6455/08 and the same was disposed of vide order of Annexure P-8 dated 21.11.2008. However, on the complaint of the petitioner respondent No.S-District 'sssfsauaSWiSww^ .IIS" ili"" '''as.iEi, i K. / ^ ^,:lw''^!'" 'TS? ^w\w<i, o-fll'y'is, fqc'ii'Hy StA^T ^il Rl'li'* '?WT3T1^?T stt*<icb ^ V S1<0 -^ Registrar has entrusted the enail though in the complaint allegatio| also. He further submits that against the decision of the res| P-10, however, no action has b^ on the complaint of Annexure P-1 On the other hand, Mr. D! the State submits that in case tt before respondent No.2 within 1! raised in this petition, the same <^wfei4S^ ^i^^r i?3T iry to respondent No.4-Sub Registrar, is are made against respondent No.4 ^ie has already made representation sondent District Registrar before the respondent No.2-lnspector Gen^rai of Stamps, Raipur vide Annexure en taken by the concerned authority. In these circumstances. responcjent No.2 be directed to take decision within a further period of four we^ks. In view of the above subm! respondent No.2 within ten days| raised in this petition. On such 10 within stioulated Deriod. ?o, learned Government Advocate for ^e petitioner files fresh representation P days for redressal of his grievances |shall be decided by respondent No,2 ssions, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioi|ier to file fresh representatlon before from today raising all ths grievances epresentation being-made, the same. shaii be considered and decid^d by the respondent No.2 within a further period offour weeks in actordance.' Certified copy today. ' Dhirendra Mishra Judge < T liaWRRTCTiHR^ra—FS/95—1 1/2008—1,00,000.