THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.604 of 2009 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.S.No.768 of 2008 in the Court of I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. He has also filed I.A.No.632 of 2008, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. After hearing both the parties, the trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 17.11.2008. Hence, this C.M.A. Heard Sri Rana Praveer, learned counsel for the appellant, and Sri V.Rama Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents. Strictly speaking, the purpose which the appellant wanted to achieve by filing O.S.No.768 of 2008 is served, on account of a subsequent development. It is stated that the respondents filed O.S.No.329 of 2008 in the Court of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the petitioner, for eviction. It means that the respondents are not going to evict the appellant, otherwise than through a decree that may be passed by the Court. Therefore, O.S.No.768 of 2008 has virtually become redundant. At any rate, the necessity to deal with the legality, or otherwise of the matter in I.A.No.632 of 2008 is obviated, on account of the fact that the respondents are not going to evict the appellant, or interfering with his possession, except through a decree that may be passed by the Court. The C.M.A. is accordingly disposed of, directing that the right of the appellant to remain in possession of the premises shall depend upon the outcome of O.S.No.329 of 2008. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:03.08.2010 GJ