mnliygintgm/y/Iall/I ‘ .H.’.“EIQELQQEBE9EL¥;E§E§£ ”113%? Misc. ?etiti.on No$ Zgféw/SM KISHGRE KWAR AGRAWAL s/o of shri 9§$;$.I_.o_r.§§é3 / £3§4£§Z~9$Em: C 03 r ‘E ESH LT ggggALPUR 3/3 {Xvi $ , wwwi;i’I}iT_£9&-QF WEE i i£ aged about 50 year3, Raigarh, rgs idene MvP. of station Choxayf gg§§91j§1§§§ § yersus. ~ 1 The Collector, H‘ k, Sum-A" . xyfxw\ Raigarh District, Raigarh, y “wnyww wgVS‘mG (“0“ ' 3W Wk. i MAD. 2 Municipal Council :4 ‘ p» ‘ k0 4v D' "‘ k 1 mfgL§ ‘ thrc’ugh its Administrator (x Q HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 756 OF 1994 PETITIONEJK Kishore Kumar Agrawal Versus The Coliactor, Raigarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Smgle Bench Hon’bie Shn Satlsh K Agmhotri J Shn Amlt Sharma Advccate for the petmonet Shn P K Bhadun Panel Lawyer for the Shte RESPONDENTS ORDER O L , (Passed on this 13 day of July 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the State submiB that this Court by order dated 26 03 1994 In vrew of the clear undertakrng grven by the ,7 petltroner directed that If the lease Is not renewed In favour of the ' petitioner he wrll demolrsh the construchon on hrs cost he was accordingly permitted to contmue wrth the oonstruotron. $hrr Sharma, teamed cwsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petttioner may be protected, as per interim reliet granted by this Court till decision is taken by the State and the State may be directed to take the decrsron on the application pending before the authorities 2. 5h" Bhadurr, learned oounsei appearing for the State submits that the application of the petitioner is pending considering. as is evident r from the order dated 7.6.1998 (Annexure P-3) and no decision coutd be taken on account of the pendency of this petition. However, the ‘oase of the petitioner, if permitted, shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible within a period of two months; in accordance with law. Accordinglyh’the state is directed to decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with taw and on its own men‘ts within a period of eight weeks. The petitioner is bound by the undertaking given by him in this Courtwhen the interim reiiefrwas granted in his favour. ln view of foregoing, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Present - Sdl~ SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge Ashok