IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 5146 of 2004. Date of Decision: 27th March, 2009. Baldev Singh ...Petitioner through None Versus Jitender Gupta & Ors. ...Respondents through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 19.10.2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge [Senior Division], Jagadhri whereby the application for providing police help moved by the respondent – plaintiff has been allowed. The said order was passed in a suit for permanent injunction. While issuing notice of motion, this Court vide order dated 26.10.2004 stayed operation of the impugned order dated 19.10.2004. The stay was confirmed while admitting the revision petition. The record reveals that the suit was filed in the year 2004. There is every likelihood that by now the suit might have been decided. In any case, the parties have re-conciled with the interim order which is holding the field from last about five years. For the reasons afore-stated, I am not inclined to go into the merits of the rival contentions and dispose of this revision petition with a direction that the impugned order dated 19.10.2004 shall not be given effect during the pendency of the suit. The observations made in the impugned order as also in this order shall, however, not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Disposed of. March 27, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE