IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 32922 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BASHEER, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.BAPPU @ POKKER, KALLIDUMBIL HOUSE, ELAMBULLASSERY VILLAGE, KARAKURUSSY, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY HOME SECRETARY, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD-678001. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNARKKAD-678582. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SREEKRISHNAPURAM POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD-679513. 5. HAMSA, S/O.ALAVI, PADINJAREKKARA, NURUKKAL CHIRA, CHERPLASSERY AMSAM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679101. ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) FOR R5 SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) FOR R5 GOVT.PLEADER, SMT.CHARISHMA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S WIFE BEFORE THE 3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENTS DT.7.7.2010. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTEDBEFOE THE 4TH RESPONDENT BY THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER DT.21.9.2010. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ISSUED BY SRIKRISHNAPURAM POLICE STATION. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 14.10.2010. EXT.P5: COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.32922 OF 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~ Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. This is a Writ Petition seeking orders for police protection to the life of the petitioner and family members. Directions are also sought for in relation to certain complaints. Having perused the materials and the earlier interim orders and having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we do not deem it necessary to express anything on the rival contentions in relation to the transaction or rights over properties. All that is required is that the interim order granted by this Court on 29.10.2010 should continue to govern parties. Hence, there will be an order directing the respondents to provide protection to the life of the petitioner, his wife, children and his mother as against any threat from the 5th respondent. This order shall, however, not be utilised in any manner before any civil court or in relation to any other disputes. The police will ensure that W.P.(C) No.32922/2010 2 this order will appropriately in force. Writ Petition ordered accordingly, leaving open all other issues. (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps