IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2010 / 18TH ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3869 of 2010() ----------------------------- C.R.NO.250/2010 OF PAYANGADI POLICE STATION, KANNUR. (S): PETITIONERS/ACCUSED --------------------------------------- 1. SIRAJ.K.K.S/O. ABDULLA, AGED 25 YEARS, KATTIKOOTTATHIL HOUSE, ONAPPARAMBU, EZHOME AMSOM, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. SAIFUDHEEN. M.K., S/O. ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 22 YEARS, MALIKKANTAKATH KOMMAN HOUSE, EZHOME AMSOM, KANNUR TLAUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. K.P.NOUSHAD, S/O.HAMSA, AGED 24 YEARS, KADAVATH PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, ONAPPARAMBU, EZHOME AMSOM,KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. MUSTHAFA, S/O. MUHAMMED KUNHI, AGED 28, MADATHIL HOUSE,EZHOME AMSOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. ABDUL RASHEED P., S/O. M.K.ABOOBACKER, AGED 19 YEARS, PULUKKOOL HOUSE, ONAPPARAMBU P.O.KOTTILA EZHOME AMSOM, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.SATHEESH SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE THROUGH PAYANGADI POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT (CRIME NO.250/2010 OF PAYANGADI POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT) REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEK CHAND. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.3869 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 9th July, 2010. O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 308, 452 and 506(ii) read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, on 30.5.2010, petitioners(Accused nos.1, 4, 5, 6 and 7) along with other accused formed themselves into unlawful assembly and armed with deadly weapons, committed house trespass, by entering into the house of defacto complainant and attacked him, using weapons and thereby committed the various offences. 3. Petitioners were arrested on 4.6.2010 and they are in custody for the past 29 days. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that there are series of political clashes in Kannur District and petitioners are falsely implicated in these offences, only because they are the workers of IUML. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioners are involved in various other crimes. Against all of them, there are other cases(A1-four other cases, A4- BA NO. 3869/10 2 five other cases, A5-two other cases, A6-two other cases and A7- six other cases). Hence, in public interest, it is not fit to grant bail to petitioners at this stage. 5. On hearing both sides and on considering the nature of the allegations made, I find that it may not be proper to grant bail to petitioners at this stage. Petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE. tgs