IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39734 of 2008 BALMIKI MAHTO @ BALMIKI YADAV, SON OF ANANDI MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JANGHARO P.S. SILAO, DISTRICT NALANDA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8. 9.9.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit indicating his antecedent and with reference to the averments made in the said supplementary affidavit, it is submitted that the other co- accused Dhananjay Kewat and Tuntun Kewat whose antecedent is not clean, have been allowed bail by another Bench under order dated 13.4.2009 (Annexure-1) to this supplementary affidavit and there is nothing to distinguish the case of the co-accused, namely, Dhananjay Kewat and Tuntun Kewat with the case of the petitioner and his prayer for bail be considered in the light of the order dated 13.4.2009 (Annexure-1). Learned counsel for the State Shri Kameshwar Dayal also accepts the position that there is nothing to distinguish the case of the petitioner with that of co-accused Dhananjay Kewat and Tuntun Kewat and the case of the petitioner is also similar to that of - 2 - N.H./ Dhananjay Kewat and Tuntun Kewat, who have been allowed bail by another Bench under order dated 13.4.2009 (Annexure-1). Let the petitioner, namely, Balmiki Mahto @ Balmiki Yadav be released on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Barh, District Patna in connection with Mokama P.S. Case No.110 of 2007, G.R. No.903 of 2007. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)