IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29650 of 2010 JATA SHANKAR SINGH @ JHOTAHABA, S/o Satrughan Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 323, 341 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering the nature of the allegation that the petitioner and other co-accused attempted to terrorize the informant and others, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge since there has been no injury caused to any one. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge. In case, it is done the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)