Criminal Misc.-M 17393 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M 17393 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 01.08.2011 Dharambir and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. On June 01, 2011, while issuing notice of motion, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioners were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners states that Ashwani son of the petitioners and husband of the complainant has been residing in Noida before and after his marriage with the complainant and now has been transferred to Singapore: petitioners are residing at Sa- haranpur; residence and mess of the petitioners is sepa- rate from their son Ashwani. He has further stated that tendency of the people to rope in all the family members cannot be ruled out. Learned counsel states that peti- tioners shall join the investigation as and when re- quired”. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition- ers have already joined investigation and the dowry articles have already been recovered. In fact, it is a case where there are temperamental differ- ences as the couple is highly educated and well settled. Criminal Misc.-M 17393 of 2011 2 Learned State counsel did not dispute the fact that the petition- ers have already been joined investigation and the dowry articles have al- ready been recovered. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the peti- tioners on June 01, 2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 01.08.2011 sharmila