THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.884 of 2010 Date: 01.04.2011 Between : Polavarapu Nagamani and another. … Petitioners and Mr. R.R.K. Mohan, Tahsildar, Veldurthy Mandal, Medak District and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.884 of 2010 ORDER : This contempt case has been filed complaining disobedience of the order dated 5.8.2009 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.20913 of 2009 in W.P.No.15943 of 2009. 2. The petitioner filed the above writ petition challenging the proceedings No.A/646/89, dated 16.8.2008 issued by the Tahsildar, Veldurthy Mandal, Medak District, mutating the names of the contesting respondents in the place of the petitioners and issuance of Pattadar Pass Books in their favour. This Court by interim order dated 5.8.2009 in W.P.M.P.No.20913 of 2009 directed that status quo obtaining as on that date should be maintained as to the nature and possession of the property and the entries in the revenue records, until further orders. The said orders are still in force. While so, the 1st respondent-Tahsildar, Veldurthy Mandal, issued a notice dated 4.6.2010 on a complaint made by the unofficial respondents purportedly under Section 107 of Cr.P.C. The petitioners, therefore, filed this contempt case alleging disobedience of the orders of this Court in issuing such notice. 3. The 1st respondent-Tahsildar, Veldurthy Mandal, has filed a counter affidavit stating that some of the unofficial respondents filed a representation dated 2.6.2010 before him, which revealed that there would be law and order problem in respect of the subject land, therefore, he issued a notice dated 4.6.2010 for appearance of the parties. It is also stated that pursuant to the said notice, the parties appeared before him and he instructed all the parties to maintain status quo as directed by this Court and not to create any law and order problem. It is also stated that except issuing the said notice, no other action has been taken. 4. In view of the categorical statement made by the 1st respondent in the counter affidavit, it is evident that the order of status quo passed by this Court has not been disturbed. Therefore, I am not inclined to initiate any action against the respondents in this contempt case. 5. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 01.04.2011. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.884 of 2010 01.04.2011 (Msr)