cra95.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2011 Bhausaheb s/o Sona Vikhe .. APPLICANT VERSUS Yamunabai Venunath Vikhe & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. R.A. Tambe, advocate for the applicant. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1 Heard learned counsel for the revision applicant. 2 Applicant is raising exception to the order passed by the District Judge – 1, Kopargaon in Application no. 24/2010 decided on 14-1-2010. The application came to be allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs.750/-. 3 I have perused the order passed by learned District Judge – 1, Kopargaon. Respondents herein/ original defendants preferred appeal cra95.11 2 against the judgment and decree passed by the trial court. The suit presented before the trial court was in respect of grant of injunction. Considering the nature of dispute and considering all the relevant circumstances, the learned District Judge -1, Kopargaon has exercised discretion in favour of the original defendants / respondents herein while condoning delay. I do not deem it necessary to cause interference in the discretionary order passed by learned District Judge – 1, Kopargaon, exercising discretion in condoning delay in presenting apeal raising exception to the judgment and decree passed by the trial court. Civil revision application is devoid of substance hence stands rejected. 4 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb