1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1270 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.860 OF 2006 Shivaji B.Mhaske .... Applicant Vs. Chandraprabha Narayan Rasal & Ors. .... Respondents Mr. S.G. Karandikar, Advocate for applicant. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Advocate for respondent no.1. Coram : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. Date : 23rd June, 2009 P.C. 1. Execution of the decree is disputed. Learned counsel for the applicant claims that the decree has not been executed whereas the learned counsel for respondents states that the decree is already executed. It is however admitted by the counsel for the applicant that respondent no.1 has been in possession of the house which is part of the suit property and residing there since a long time. In that circumstance, the parties are directed to maintain status-quo in respect of the suit property. With this order, the Civil Application stands disposed off. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.)