-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2006 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST.NO.15953 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2315 OF 2004 Shri.Balaso Aba Shelke ..Applicant Vs. Hutama Kisan Aher Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.S.C.Prabhu i/b Narendra Bandiwadekar counsel for applicant Mr.Sachin Manale i/b S.S.Pakale counsel for respondent no.1 None for respondents nos.2 and 3. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007 DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007 DATE : JANUARY 09, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. This application is for condonation of delay of 119 days. The respondents though served, have not filed affidavit opposing the condonation of delay. However, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 vehemently opposed the condonation of delay. We have gone through the application for condonation of -2- delay. We find that delay has been properly explained and there is sufficient ground for condonation of delay. Delay is therefore, condoned. Office to number the above appeal. Civil appication is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]