IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.19572 of 1998 Between: G. Sudharshan Reddy, S/o. G.Chinna Reddy, R/o.Bollaram, Pangal Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar. 2 The Project Director, Drought Prone Area Programme, ( D. P. A. P. ), Mahaboobnagar. 3 P.I.A., S.D.D.P.A., Wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in conducting a fresh Grama Sabha vide their Notice dated 0-7-1998, issued by the Respondent No.3 for formation of the 2nd Watershed Committee at Bollarm Village, as illegal, arbitrary, without any sanction of law and against the spirit and object of the Act, besides violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to continue the Welfare activities by the existing Committee. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.ANANDAM (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: ORDER: Challenging the impugned Notice dated -07-1998 issued by the 3rd respondent proposing to conduct a fresh Grama Sabha at Bollaram village on 14.07.1998 for formation of 2nd Watershed Committee, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. When the matter is taken up today for hearing, none appears for the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, on instructions, submitted that pursuant to the stay orders of this Court, passed in WPMP No.23353 of 1998, dated 13.07.1998, the Grama Sabha scheduled to be held on 14.07.1998, for formation of 2nd Watershed Committee, was not conducted, as such, as on today nothing survives in the writ petition for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 17.03.2005 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar. 2 The Project Director, Drought Prone Area Programme, ( D. P. A. P. ), Mahaboobnagar. 3 P.I.A., S.D.D.P.A., Wanaparthy, Mahaboobnagar. 4 Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SUNITHA}