IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1801 of 2006 JANKI DEVI & ORS. Versus RAM SURAT RAI & ORS. ----------- For the Petitioners: M/s Nagendra Rai & Navin Nikunj, Advocates 2. 30.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This civil revision application has been filed by the defendants-petitioners against the order dated 17.8.2006 passed by Munsif 2nd, Saran at Chapra in Title Suit No.140/91 by which the plaintiffs have been allowed to file certain documents in the suit on payment of cost of Rs.500/-. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the documents which are being sought to be produced and exhibited in the suit by the plaintiffs are forged and fabricated documents. Moreover, he submits that as per own undertaking of the plaintiffs in this Court at the time of disposal of their earlier Civil Revision No.67 of 2004 by order dated 12.7.2004, the plaintiffs had impressed upon this Court that they require to examine only three more witnesses. He submits that in fact, - 2 - the plaintiffs have examined more than three witnesses and they will again examine some witnesses to get the documents proved and exhibited. It is needless to say that once some documents are permitted by the trial court to be produced, the same have to be proved and exhibited in accordance with law. So far as their genuineness is concerned, the defendants will get an opportunity and will be at liberty to question the same when evidence is taken for getting the documents proved. Therefore, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order. The suit appears to be of the year, 1991 and, therefore, this Court directs the trial court to expedite the hearing of the suit and decide the same preferably within a period of six months from today. With the above observation and direction, this civil revision application is disposed of. B.T. (J.N. Singh, J.)