IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2011 / 20TH POUSHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1548 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24990/2010 DTD. 7/09/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------- PAULOSE THOMAS, S/O.LATE THOMAS, AGED 59 YEARS, CHITTAYATHU HOUSE, NELLIMATTOM P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. MOHAN RAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION, STATE OFFICE (KERALA),M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. LALITHAMMA PANUS, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.KESAVAN KUTTY,SC,KVIC R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- Cont.Case No.1548 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 10th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner made an application for financial assistance and approval of the scheme for the installation of a M-sand Unit. By judgment rendered on 7th September, 2010, his writ petition was disposed of recording the submission made by the 1st respondent that his application will also be considered. It is alleging disobedience of the direction in the judgment, the contempt has been filed. 2. From the submission now made before this Court what is disclosed is that the applications such as the one made by the petitioner are to be considered by a Committee headed by the District Collector and that the respondents are to place the applications received before such committee. It is stated that the applications received up to May 2010 were placed before the committee and the committee considered those applications in the meeting held on 12.8.2010. Cont.Case No.1548 of 2010 2 3 According to the learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent, petitioner's application was received on 2.6.2010 and that his application, along with other applications received, will be placed before the Committee in its next meeting as and when such a meeting is scheduled by the District Collector. 4. Thus, as at present, petitioner cannot accuse the respondents of having disobeyed the directions in the judgment. Therefore, recording the submission made as above by the learned standing counsel, this contempt case is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma Cont.Case No.1548 of 2010 3