1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 246 of 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2011 Gruh Finance Limited .. Applicant / Org. Complainant Versus Mandakini Anil Ubale & Anr. ...Respondents Ms.P.R.Mala i/b. M.V.Kini & Co. for Applicant. Mr. V.B.Kondedeshmukh, APP for State. CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 6th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. Respondent No.1 is duly served and the advocate has rendered appearance on behalf of the respondent no.1. He is absent. 2. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. For the reasons mentioned in paragraph 13 of the application, satisfactory explanation is given for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2 Delay can be condoned. Hence the order. ORDER i) Application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Application is allowed. ii) Criminal Application for leave be placed on board as per its turn. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)