1 wp.1727.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1727 OF 2010 Madhukar Shetty ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Ms.Nayana Pardeshi i/b Mr.D.M.Shah for Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for State. Mr.K.N.Gaikwad for Respondent No.3. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 3, 2010. P.C. 1. Learned A.P.P. states on instructions that in view of the Corporation’s letter dated 26th December 2009 received by the Investigating Officer requesting to keep the investigation in abeyance, no further precipitative action is being taken against the Petitioner. 2. Counsel for the Corporation on instructions states that the Corporation is examining the regularisation proposal submitted by the Petitioner and after final decision is taken thereon and occupation certificate issued for the whole building, the Corporation may consider of 2 wp.1727.10.sxw withdrawing the proposed action under Section 53 of the Act. That statement is placed on record. 3. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in this Petition. The same is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to take recourse to appropriate remedy as may be permissible in law, if and when required. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)