IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28823 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ THOMAS A.E., S/O. A.T.ENASU, AGED 58 YEARS, ALOOR HOUSE, P.O.KOTTAPPURAM, ERUMAPETTY - VIA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROAD DIVISION, CHEMBUKAVU, PIN-680 020, THRISSUR. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION, THALAPPILLY TALUK, KUMARANELLOOR P.O., WADAKANCHERY, THRISSUR-680 590. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ROAD DIVISION, WADAKANCHERY, THRISSUR-680 590. 4. TAHSILDAR, TALAPPILLY TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, WADAKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 582. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.28823/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.33414/10 DTD.30.11.10 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DTD.24.6.11 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN B6.24097/2010. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD.27.9.2011. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER IN B6-24097/2010 DTD.10.10.11. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.25.8.2011. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.19.9.11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 28823 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 9th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T In Ext.P1 judgment, this Court directed survey and demarcation of Athani - Puduruthy PWD road. In pursuance to the direction, survey was conducted and Ext.P2 report was submitted by the Tahsildar to the 2nd respondent indicating encroachment in the PWD puramboke. This report was submitted on 24/6/11. However, further action was not taken and complaining of this, he writ petition has been filed. 2. The case was adjourned with a direction to the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions in the matter. According to the learned Government Pleader, on receipt of Ext.P2 report, survey stones have been placed throughout the length of the road in question. It is also submitted that notices have been issued to the encroachers and that some of the encroachers have already been evicted or vacated. It is submitted that further action against the remaining people are also being taken. 3. From the submissions thus made by the learned WPC No. 28823/11 :2 : Government leader itself, it is evident that the allegation of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent is remaining inactive on Ext.P2 report is incorrect and that steps are being taken. In view of the above, recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp