1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.549 OF 2009 Dattatreya Ganpat Takale, through legal heir, Sindhu Vasantrao Taware and Anr. .... Petitioners V/s. Deepak Suryakant Purawat and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Surel S. Shah, for the petitioners. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2009 P.C. 1. No case is made out for interfering in a revision under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, as the learned District Judge by the impugned order, condoned the delay in filing the appeal by imposing costs in favour of the present petitioner. It cannot be said that the impugned order suffers from any jurisdictional error. Hence, the civil revision application is rejected. 2. It will be open to the petitioners to apply before the learned District Judge to expedite hearing of the appeal. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)