1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2941 OF 2010 (Smt. Sunita Ajay Bhole -: versus :- Sunderlal Namdeorao Badwaik and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 02, 2010. Heard Shri S.P. Kshirsagar, learned counsel for petitioner. Both the Courts have found petitioner not an indigent person. It is noticed that business being done in the name of S.B. Computers, was suppressed and plea that, that business was closed down has not been substantiated. It is also noticed that other applicant has purchased a Car on loan. Her contention that installments were being paid by her husband and her daughter. The relevant evidence has been considered by both the Courts. I do not find the consideration in any way perverse. 2 Learned counsel for petitioner has invited attention of this Court to the judgments reported at AIR 2005 Rajasthan 32 (Smt. Manjulata .vrs. Sidhkaran), AIR 1992 Kerala 359 (Mrs. S. Resleth .vrs. Indian Bank and others) and AIR 2001 MP 108 (Kapil (Minor) .vrs. Dr. Shivmangal Awasthy), to urge that income of the family is totally irrelevant in such situation. It is his further contention that the capacity of applications to pay the court fee needs to be looked into and in present facts, it has been established on record that both the applicants are unable to pay such court fee. In view of the findings on facts concurrently recorded by both the Courts, I find that the citations are not relevant. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.