CWP(T) No. 14431/2008 23.02.2011 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate for the respondents According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, stand taken by the respondents in the reply is factually not correct. He submits that now-a-days four posts of Junior Draftsman are still lying vacant. He further submits that respondents have not denied the fact that similarly situated persons have also been appointed/regularized as Junior Draftsman. He also submits that his client shall be content, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case in light of the decision taken in the case of other similarly situated persons, particulars whereof are mentioned in Para 6 (vii) of the petition. 2. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case and take action within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Needless to add, decision shall be taken in accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of. February 23, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.