1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL MISC. APPEAL No. 1829 of 2007 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS V/S M/S JETHANAND BABULAL & ANR Mr. HR SONI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 24.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. By the impugned order, the learned court below has dismissed the petitioner's application filed under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act. A look at the judgment shows that the objections were raised under the head of misconduct of the arbitrator but then a look at the contention raised before the learned court below during the course of arguments shows that all contentions were raised on the merits of the findings given by the arbitrator like obstruction in making the site available, and soil being available on the original borrow area, and so on and so forth, but then no ground of misconduct has been shown as comprehended by Section 30. In that view of the matter, I do not find any error in the impugned judgment. 2 The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /sushil/