1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1126 of 2009 [State Bank Karmachari Sena Vs. Chairman, SBI & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. V.P. Marpakwar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. M. Anilkumar, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 3. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 11th March, 2010. 1. This petition was heard on various occasions, and lastly on 10th March, 2010. 2. Having noticed that the disposal of petition may be with certain observations, which may not be a welcome sign for the petitioner, learned Adv., sought adjournment, so that he can take instructions and withdraw the petition. 3. Today, learned Adv. Mr. V.P. Marpakwar for the petitioner is not present. 4. Upon going through record, Affidavit- in-Reply and a Rejoinder, we are of the view that the petitioner's grievance that the matter requires to be enquired, was in the nature of a misrepresentation. 2 5. The enquiry was already conducted by Enquiry Committee, constituted in compliance with the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vishaka & ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors. [AIR 1997 SC 3011]. This Committee consisted of three women members, one Law Officer and one other male member. 6. The claim made in the petition that the sexual harassment meted out to one of female members of petitioner-Union has gone unenquired is factually incorrect. 7. The report of the Enquiry Committee says that personal grievances and differences other than sexual harassment is the real cause of the complaint. 8. In view of this, we are satisfied that no further action in this matter is necessary. 9. Petition has no merit, and is dismissed. Judge Judge |Hedau|