Civil Revision No. 185 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 185 of 2009 Date of Decision: September 09, 2009 Govind Ram and another ......... Petitioners versus Municipal Committee, Jhajjar and another .......... Respondents Present:- Shri Avnish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sanjay Singh, Advocate for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. The plaintiffs are in revision petition aggrieved against the order passed by the learned Courts below whereby their application for grant of ad interim injunction was dismissed. It was found by the learned Courts below that the plaintiffs have not produced any document of ownership in respect of the area in dispute and, therefore, the plaintiffs are not entitled to the injunction. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the plaintiffs are in possession, may be without any title, therefore, they are entitled to protect their possession and they can only be dispossessed in accordance with law. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has argued that the vacant land vests with the Municipal Committee and the same cannot be permitted to be used by the plaintiffs so as to oust the Municipal Committee from its user. Civil Revision No. 185 of 2009 [2] As per site plan produced by the plaintiffs before the learned trial Court, the plot in dispute is reflected as vacant since the wall EF stands demolished. After demolition of the wall, it is vacant plot, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice that both the parties keep the plot vacant and is not used by any of the parties till final determination of lis by the learned trial Court. Consequently, present revision petition stands disposed of in the terms indicated above. September 09, 2009 ( HEMANT GUPTA ) ks JUDGE