2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2707 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 27.01.2010 1. Heard Adv. Shri A.S. Barlota for the applicant. He has taken me through the judgments of both Courts and the record. He strenuously argued that the view taken by the learned Magistrate in convicting the respondent was reasonable view which ought not to have been reversed by the Sessions Court while deciding the appeal filed by the respondent. However, after going through both the judgments, the reasons given by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No. 99 of 2007 decided on 15.06.2009 appear to be equally convincing. Admittedly, the respondent is a coolie and there was no reason for advancing loan of Rs. 1,20,000/- by 2 present applicant and that too only on obtaining cheque. 2. After going through the judgment of the Appellate Court, in my opinion, said view is reasonable and probable. Now law is well settled that when two views are equally possible, appeal against acquittal must fail. In the circumstances this is not a case where leave should be granted. 3. Hence, leave to file appeal is rejected. The Criminal Application stands dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/JAN10/cra2707.09