IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Revision No.855 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 26, 2006 Machhi Ram and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Punjab and another ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab. Mr.R.S.Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ... I have heard the counsel for the parties. Since after the remand, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fazilka has passed the summoning order dated 10.3.2006, which has been challenged in Crl.Misc.No.65949-M of 2006, this criminal revision filed by the petitioners against the order dated 27.2.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur for remanding the matter to the Judicial Magistrate, has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. October 26, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE