IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.658 of 2008. Date of decision: 05.03.2009. Harinder Mohan Chadha ….Petitioner Versus Ram Singh Chauhan ….Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr.Anand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud,J. Before I dispose of the petition, I must express my dis-pleasure in the manner in which the learned trial Court has proceeded to consolidate three orders passed in three different miscellaneous applications. A composite order dated 31.10.2008 disposing of an applications under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 65 and 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1882 and Order 8 Rule 1-A of the Code of Civil Procedure has been passed for each application though different grounds have been set out for each application. Surely, the learned Court was alive to the fact that the provisions of law and the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? Yes. 2 facts to be considered for disposing of each of the applications were distinct and separate and the principles of law/provision applicable are also different. The petitioner herein has challenged the order refusing the amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure as prayed for by the petitioner herein seeking to raise a plea that the Court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit. The learned trial Court notices that this question is already covered by issue No.7 as framed as to whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain the case or not. In these circumstances, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the trial Court. Of-course, if there is any other ground on which the petitioner herein seeks to challenge the jurisdiction of the Court, it will be open to him to move such other and further application/amendment to the pleadings. This petition is accordingly disposed of. CMP No.937 of 2008. The order dated 26.11.2008 is vacated. This application is disposed of. CMP No.939 of 2008. Infructuous. March 5, 2009. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.