:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3209 OF 1986 SUIT NO. 3209 OF 1986 SUIT NO. 3209 OF 1986 .......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders .......................................................... Mr. Bruno Catellino i/b. Pandya & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. B. Shroff i/b. Tejpal & Co. for the Defendant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD AUGUST 2007 : 23RD AUGUST 2007 : 23RD AUGUST 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs seeks an adjournment. He states that the Plaintiffs have been invited to attend a meeting at Ahmedabad at the instance of the Defendant for settlement. The learned Counsel for the Defendant states that there is no such meeting. 2. On 10th August 2007, adjournment was granted to the Plaintiffs as a last chance. Only by way of indulgence, by order dated 10th August 2007, this Court directed that the suit shall be set down on Board today "For :2: Dismissal". The said order makes it clear that no further adjournment will be granted. 3. In view of order dated 10th August 2007, the prayer made by the learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs for adjournment cannot be granted and the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE