IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21259 of 2009 DHARMENDRA KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 11.09.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code to which Section 302 was added subsequently and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the FIR is against unknown, there is no eye witness, the body was found abandoned. The only material is the confession of a co-accused made before the Police, inadmissible in evidence. The petitioner was allegedly only seen running away from the place of occurrence along with the co-accused and others. The wife of the deceased filed a petition under Section 164 Cr.P.C. that she suspected the involvement of the brothers of her husband with whom there was family property feud going on. Learned Counsel for the State from the case diary is unable to point out any material beyond confession of the co- accused and fairly acknowledge that no investigation has been done on the apprehension raised by wife of the deceased. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Nawadah in Nagar (Bundelkhand) PS Case No. 68 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)