1 11/11/11 Shri Ravindra Singh, Advocate for the applicants. Smt. Sangeeta Pachauri, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/ State. Heard. Perused case diary. This is first application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of applicants for grant of anticipatory bail, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.100/2011 registered at police station Lateri, District Vidisha for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 294, 506, 324, 323, 326 and 451 of IPC. As per prosecution case, due to some previous dispute applicant and co-accused armed with lathi and farsa, caused injuries to Bhagwan Singh, Lal Singh and others as a result of which Lal Singh sustained grievous injuries in the incident. It is contended by learned counsel on behalf of applicants that main allegation of causing grievous injuries to Lal Singh is against co-accused Dashrath Singh. Only allegation against present applicants is that they have caused injuries to injured Bhagwan Singh and others by means of lathi. It is further submitted that a cross-case concerning Crime No.99/2011 has been registered against complainant party for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 506, 294 and 325 of IPC. It is further submitted that applicants are ready to cooperate with investigation and ready to abide with all the conditions to be imposed by this Court. On these grounds, prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 2 Learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent/ State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, application is allowed and it is directed that in case of arrest, applicants be released on bail, on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand Only) each with one solvent surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer with condition that they shall cooperate with the investigation and shall remain present whenever called by I.O. during investigation. They shall also abide with all the conditions as enumerated under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Trial Court is directed to follow the guidelines laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others AIR 2011 SC 312. A copy of this order be sent to the PS and Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. CC as per rules. (Indrani Datta) Judge mkb*