IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2008 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 36938 of 2008(V) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER : ---------------- GEETHA, KALLINGAVALAPPIL HOUSE, VENGINIKARA, EDAPPAL. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS : ------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.36938 OF 2008 ------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner, who is operating a regular stage carriage on the route Ponnani - Pattambi, has sought for variation of the conditions of permit by way of an extension of the route from Edappal to Kalachal and also reduction of trips from Edappal to Ponnani. Variation was allowed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam, but varied permit is yet to be issued. In the meanwhile petitioner submitted an application for temporary permit as per Ext.P2 to operate on the extended portion. Her grievance is that 2nd respondent is not considering Ext.P2 application. 2. I heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader. W.P.(C) 36938 of 2008 2 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 application and to take appropriate decision thereon, within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the judgment. V.GIRI JUDGE pac