^ IN THEHIGiICQURT OF JUDICATURE BILASPUR W.PJS) No38 'LS 72006 PETITIONER ^^ ^.%^c::-""" ^.AA ^^^^•v" <5^,.,.••- ' <-'"' RESPONDENTS ^•~'\ ^^;" Khilawan Prasad Vastrakar, (^M&.1<^<=^' S/o Late Sevaleram Vastrakar, Aged about 57 Years, R/o • Palas 50 Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Forest Departnnent, Mantralaya D K S Bhawan, Raipur.Ce'(<^ 2. Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspur(C.G.). otl 3. Dhdsioi^Forest OfEcer, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8s 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^^ XI-HC-78 311^1 Wf^lNi TOTSn^Tshtlitti Roshan/- '•°"%'f ^IH^II aWlc»> 3^'^lWIcPT, ®Tflyis,fs|^lti^< ..wf..^./.?./M ^R; 200 3T1^?rKa<t> (yit^q^i'T) ??dTW ?rfl?T SfI^T 7.8.2006 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Adji Heard. By this petition the 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-3) whereby h|e Division Bilaspur to Bijapur Forest The main ground of ohallenge Deputy Ranger, which falls in the o^iti has been transferred inter district, employees are not transferred out from Sciatica, therefore also the Therefore, learned oounsel be aliowed to make a detailed directed to decide the same in Govt. Adv. for the State has no objeitt Having heard learned couns^l and circumstances of the case, case, the petitioner is allowed to raising all the grievances within 10 and in turn, respondent No.1 to period of 30 days from the date of after considering all the grievances With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.; Certified copy as per rules. tii'iiFn'fl-i iTpRrl'' ^' te'^t' <Ri<^i< ^ari^Tsn^T. Advoi|;ate for the petitioner. 1/ooate for the State on advance copy. petitiofier has ohallenged his transfer order dated h|e has been transferred from Sothi Circle Forest Cfvision, Bastar Circte. hallen^e is that the petitioner is working on the post of o^itegory of Class-3 employees and the petitioner |whioh is punitive in nature, normally Class-3 district. Moreover, the petitioner is a suffering is prejudicial to the health of the petitioner the petitioner submits that the petitioner may to respondent No. 1 and in turn, he be with law, to which Shri Bajaj, learned ttion. couns^l for the parties and having regard to the facts expressing any opinion on the merit of the a detailed representation to respondent No.1 (Jays from today along with copy of this petition the representation of the petitioner within a r^ceipt of representation in accordance with law r^ised by the petitioner. l]he petition stands disposed of. J973/06 also stands disposed of. • ^ v"^e df trarlsfer fbr repre^entation acdordance witrtout maKe dedide P.T.O. i~? !\- ^ }