Crl. Misc. No.M-19481 of 2010 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: October 13, 2010. Crl. Misc. No.M-19481 of 2010 (O&M). Mohd. Ramzaan .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.J.S.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG., Haryana. M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL). At the instance of petitioner, an FIR No.159 dated 01.09.2009, was registered at Police Station Nagina, District Mewat, under Sections 148, 149 & 307 IPC read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, against the private respondents. The petitioner claims that he was inflicted injuries with gun shots and an attempt on his life was made by the private respondents who happens to be his relation and that the case has not been fairly investigated. In reply filed by the State, it has been reported that . . . 1 Crl. Misc. No.M-19481 of 2010 (O&M) on investigation the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the petitioner were not found to have been caused by firearm. The respectable of the village were joined in the investigation. All the persons joined had reported that no incident or altercation has taken place as alleged. State counsel informs that cancellation report has been sent to the higher authorities. Counsel for the petitioner has alleged that the investigation had been partial and that the Investigating Agency has not acted fairly. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and gone through the material on record. It will not be appropriate for this Court in the exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to await the evidence and scrutinize the authenticity of the medical evidence regarding the medical opinion about the injuries Nos.1 & 2 alleged to have been received by the petitioner. The cancellation report having already been prepared, it will not be prudent to analyses the cancellation report as the petitioner will have sufficient opportunity to file protest petition in case the cancellation report is presented in the Court of Illaqua Magistrate. No ground is made out for exercise of inherent jurisdiction. The petition is dismissed. However, it is observed that the dismissal of this petition will not, in any manner, prejudice the rights of the petitioner to seek the alternative remedy available to him . . . 2 Crl. Misc. No.M-19481 of 2010 (O&M) in accordance with law or to contest the cancellation report at opportune time by filing protest petition. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE October 13, 2010. rka . . . 3