IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2011 / 12TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26333 of 2011(N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------------- GOPAL PRASAD, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNA SING, KATTUKULANGARA, AJANUR, HOSDURG, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGOD AT KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671315. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULLUR VILLAGE, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671531. 4. P. BHASKARAN, CONVENER, VISHNUMANGALAM PADASEKHARA SAMITHI, PULLUR, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671531. R1 TO R3 BY SENIOT GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 26333 of 2011(N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED BY WHICH THE PETITIONER HAS PURCHASED THE SAID PROPERTY. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2-9-2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGINST THE EXT. P3 ORDER. EXT.P4(A) : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY FILED ALONG WITH THE EXT. P4 APPEAL. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE. STU P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ----------------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 26333 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT Being aggrieved by Ext.P3 Order passed by the second respondent/RDO, the petitioner has already filed Ext.P4 Revision Petition, which is pending consideration before the first respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for a direction to have the said Revision Petition considered and disposed of within a reasonable time. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. In view of the limited nature of submission, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case or to issue any notice to the 4th respondent for the time being. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to both the sides including the 4th respondent. The proceedings shall be finalised as above, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall 2 WP(C) No. 26333/2011 produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the Writ Petition before the first respondent for further steps. It is made clear that all further steps pursuant to Ext.P3 shall be kept in abeyance till finalisation of the proceedings as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc