IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6255 of 2010 Bajrangi Mahto, son of Late Meghan Mahto, village Lakho, PS Mufassil, District Begusarai – petitioner. Vs. 1. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna – Respondents. 2 21.4.2010 This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the Chairman of the Bihar Public Service Commission should dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure 3 by which the petitioner seeks to inspect the answer sheets with respect to 48th to 52nd Combined Competitive Examinations held by the Commission. There is an order of this court, dated 22.2.2008 passed by a Division Bench in CWJC No577/2008 wherein this question has been answered and it has been accepted both by the petitioner of that case and the Commission that there is no provisions, Act, Rule or regulations which allows a person to inspect the answer sheet. All representations filed before an authority require an order to be passed. However, since the petitioner has come to this court, I do not think it essential that the Chairman of the Commission should pass any order on his representation in view of the fact that there is no provisions for inspection of the answer sheet. If an authority is to dispose of all representations made before them even if there is no reasonable basis for making a prayer before the authority concerned or the prayer is not in 2 accordance with the Act, Rules or regulations, it would not serve any useful purpose to insist that all representations must be disposed of as a matter of right, however, frivolous and unreasonable. This court at least cannot encourage such a practice. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)