(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Writ Petition No. 5809 of 2008 Smt. Indrabai w/o. Annasaheb Majmule .. Petitioners & 14 others. (Original plaintiffs) versus Hanumant s/o. Madhav Dangat & .. Respondents 2 others. (Nos.1 & 2 - Original defendants) .................. Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. M.K. Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.3. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 25TH JUNE 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 8th September 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Beed, below Exhibit 51 in Special Civil Suit No. 38/2005, thereby directing the petitioners plaintiff to deposit the stamp (2) duty as per valuation of the suit property from the competent authority i.e. Sub-Registrar, and the order dated 10th July 2008 below Exhibit 71, thereby rejecting the application filed by the petitioners plaintiffs for revaluation of the property. 2. From the amendment of Article 25 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, it can be seen that for a conveyance, market value has to be paid on the basis of the true market value. 3. In that view of the matter, no infirmity or perversity could be found with the approach adopted by the trial court, so as to warrant interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/wp5809