1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 6874/2010 Pawan Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan 4.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Sudhir Kumar Tewari - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as the petitioner is concerned, he has nothing to do with the transaction made between Subhash Jat and Sanjay Poddar. He has been falsely implicated in the matter. When he was arrested and produced for remand before the court of ACJM, Bidhannagar, North 24 Pargana he was given transit bail with a direction for appearance before the ACJM, Fatehpur on 22.6.2010. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner application under section 438 CrPC was moved on 16.6.2010 however the same was dismissed and, thereafter petitioner did not appear before the 2 ACJM, Fatehpur on 22.6.2010. In view of above, petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application. He submits that application under section 438 CrPC was moved by the petitioner however the same was dismissed and, thereafter petitioner did not appear before the ACJM, Fatehpur on 22.6.2010 as was directed by the ACJM, Bidhannagar (North), 24 Pargana. Thus, the order passed by the ACJM, Bidhannagar(North) 24 Pargana has been flouted. In view of aforesaid, no case is made out for grant of bail. This is apart from the fact that petitioner is not a innocent person. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail application is hereby dismissed. Copy of this order be sent to the court of ACJM, Bidhannagar (North), 24 Pargana, West Bengal. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma