IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 285 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision:- 25.3.2010 Jainarayan ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr.Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. R.S.Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) It has been submitted by learned State counsel, on the basis of the information collected from Daya Nand, ASI, that the prosecution has already concluded its evidence and after the production of the defence evidence by the accused, the case is now fixed for final arguments. In view of statement of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. March 25, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge