-HC—78 ^n^r ??T RTiich TT^T'2?TT^T $h^i<=h 75ET ^ll-qi^At, ^xn^<|(S, fsf<?')H^< ^l^dl *<41ck ••—•-•• •"•—••"•—-"••—---—^F^ 200 3n^r XRW (4<<I^<^) '^HW^rf^T^T^T BB; HON'BLE SHRI DHIKENC PET2TIONER RBSPONDBNTS Sit ab|: Pab B^ VER^US 1. Tii|c Di|- 2. Th|E Bi|s 3, Uijiashaiikai' Pahcliav? Bil 2.'7-2.-2008 Shri Rakesh Paiidey, Adl Shri Paiikaj Shrivastavaj The petitioner by this pe| 1. The HoiT^le Couit appropriate wiit,f prohibition therel^ pass aiiy order oj dated 31-7-2007 ^ hHQself is compet4 2. The Hon'ble Cou4 respoiident No. 2 of Aiinexure P-1 Coiu-t. The grievance of the p^t applicatJDu uiider Sectmn 401 short, liereiiiafter refeiTed to a|s GM^f<n<fli +ii^<;il ^fe^t <P»i^i< ^ ^tRfH 37T^?T 'RA'.MISHRA.J. rarani Kah.ai', S/o Kaitikrani, age.d 3ut 37 yeai's, up-Smpajich, Gi^mi Licliayat, Bilaigarh, Jaiipad Paiicliayat, aigarh, District Raipur (CG) 'e Additioiial Collector, Baloda. Bazaiy itrict Raipur (CG) Sub OivisioiiRl Ofiiccr (Rcvcuucl aigarh, District Raipur (CG) Nirala, Sajipaj.ich Grajii Licliayat, Bilaigarli, Jaiipad Paiicliayal, aigarh, District Raipur (CG) k)cate for the petitiouer. Paiiel La^7er, for the State. tition has prayed forfollowiiig reliefs:- t iiiay kiiidly be pleasecl t.o issue an [oiTier/directiou iii the iiatiire of ^ proliibitiiig the respondent.No. 1 to [I tiie report ot tlie responctent iNo. '2 Yunej'aire P-1 as the respondent No. 2 nt to pass the order. t may kmdly be pleased to dircct the to pass the order hiBiself on the basi^ aiid the reconis available with the p^titioner is tliat the petitioner filed aii of the Pajichayat Raj Aclhmiyam (fbr a|s the AdhuiB7am) before the prescribed ^u^ -qi'qi^q, ^iTn-y^KS, fs|<y!>l^^< *<INdl *t11<h"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""H^ 200 3H^?T T?5TO ( 4C<^<^ ) ^TT^T^T ^\^ 'cW3:H??T sh^lcb c/ '^nw^f^T ^TT^T aiitliority agaio.st the respondej Paiichayat, Bilaigarh allegmg cj thaA proceediiig, he also move< tlie Adliiiiiyaiii to suspend the| disposal of the proceedmg und| FTescribed Autliorin7 nistead of| the saaie to the Additional C{ action, which is coiiti^iy to the It is not m. dispzite tliat mitiated proceediiig iiuder Secl Sanpaiich. Sectioii 85 of the. A| Goveniment or the prescribed resolutioii, order etc. passed b^l exercised after affoiduig reascj concenied PanchaYat. In vicw of the above, the order of Annexure P-i.whereb^ lias fonvaixled the appllcation the Aciditioual Collector for ap| ijlegalin7 or jurisdictiouaJ er{ waiTaiitiag interference unde^ inciia. The petition is ciismissedj CMAl?<rt<flTl '^F^f ^' 'fe^ <f^i^i< '^stRw^^^T tit No. 3/ the Sa^aiich of the Gram ^rtaiii llnaiicial irreguiadties and m an appMcation zuider. Section 85 of liiiaiicial power of the Sar}3aB.ch tul sr Sections 40 of tlie Adhuiiyain. Ttie Ipassiiig aiiy suitable orcler forwarded bUect.or, Baloda Bazar for necessaiy ^rovisions of tlie Adhmiyaiii. |the preseribed autliorin7 has already tioii 40 of the Aclhmiyam agaiiist the jliiinn'aoi confers power on tlie State mthority to siispend executioii of ajiy the Paiialicyat aiid the same is to be |nal3le opportiinity of heariiig to the grievaiice of the petitioner agaijist tlie tlie Sub Divisional Officer, Bilaigai'h inder Section 85 of the Adhiaiyain to )roval ca^inot be faulted. There is 110 'or committed by tlie respondents Article 227 of the Coustitiition of Sd/- DhireridraMishra Judge GRPRJ — FS/246—2/2007 — 50,UOO.