IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13725 of 2010 MADHUSUDAN @ MADHUSUDAN YADAV @ MADHUSUDAN KUMAR YADAV, S/o Sri Hiraman Rai. . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner happens to be the brother-in- law of the deceased who died in his house in suspicious condition. The allegation against the petitioner was that he being the brother-in-law of the deceased had administered poison to his brother-in- law along with the other family members. However, there is no eye-witness to the occurrence and the post-mortem examination report does not conclusively opine about the cause of death. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in 2 connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 143 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)