MC 2389/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. MH Borbhuiyan, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner, Dr. Ahmed, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation as well as Mr. Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. The applicant/writ petitioner, by the present application, is praying for amendm ent of the pleadings in the writ petition contending inter alia that after filin g of the writ petition the order of settlement of the fishery in question in fav our of the respondent No. 3 has been issued which necessitated filing of the pre sent application seeking amendment of the pleadings. Having heard the learned counsel for the appearing parties and upon consideratio n of the averments made in the application, I am of the view that the amendment of the pleadings is necessary for deciding the dispute between the parties effec tively and completely and such amendment would also not change the nature and ch aracter of the writ petition. That being the position, the prayer for amendment is allowed. Misc. Case stands disposed of. The petitioner shall file the amended writ petition within one week from today.