.^^s-^^s^ ^•-:s^^----- ^ssW Aals4- ^.!..J--'''" Q^ ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 2-31t f OF 2010 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS BIEt;iiltt! 1. Thandaram Patel, S/o Shri Loknath Patel, aged about 30 years, R/o Kanchan Ganga Colony, Phase-II, House No. 99, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Arun.Kumar Kedia S/o Shri Mohan Lal Kedia, aged about 30 years, R/o Near Tulsi Hotel, Raraniwas Talkies Chowk, Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Departraent of Health, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Directorate of Medical Education Chhattisgarh, through its Director, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Niraj Kumar Gupta s/o not know to the petitioners, aged about 28 years (roll No. 10546) 4. Mukesh Kumar Kesharwani s/o not known to the petitioners, aged about 29 years (roll No. 10769) 5. Renu Chandrakar s/o not known to the petitioners, aged about 28 years (roU No. 10636) (SETOT 'ON \]pi) s-resA T:£ ^noq^ p3§B 's-ouoi^sd QVft 01 UAOU5( ^OU 0/g ^BAsref Aaafe^ •(7^ (8MOT 'ONTIO-I) SJBS^ gg ^noqB pag^ 'sjauo^sd 3Lp 01 UMOTCI :ou o/a BqppBQ Bireqo^y £1 (frggoi 'ON \\o.i) aiBaS. 93 inocye psSs 'sjsuoi^sd 3Ty. o^ UAVOU!( ^ou o/s uref ?[Bind ST (6ZOOT "ON no^) s-reaX gg ^noqv paSis 'sjauoi^ad aip o^ UAOUSI 4ou o/s iLrepuBqoqn^ USSABN -[-[ (80101 'ON HOJ) s-rea^ /.g ^noq-e pa§B 'sjauoppad aq^ o^ UMOU?[ ^ou O/Q vaajL3j\ 'eAud o'[ (Z9EOT 'ON IIOJ) SIB3& sg ^noq^ p3§B 'sjsuoi^sd sip o^ UMou5[ ^ou o/s nLTBg ^ire^; {Biire^ •6 (S-bTOT 'ON \\oi] sjeaX Q^ ^noqB psS^ 'sjauoi^pod 3L[^ O^ UMOIiq 10U 0/Q ^dtlQ BUJBMg -g (OSSOT -ON IIOJ) sjeaA Q£ V^o<fe paSv 'sjauoTipod aq^ O^ UAVOU51 ^OU 0/Q ^pAYBjSy nftre]/\[ •/, (£9101 'ON yoi) SIB3& /,g ^noqe paS^ 's-isuop^sd 3^ O^ UAOLO[ 1.0U 0/Q 'TUOg ^UTUV "9 5 aii' /> 15 Sum.an Agrawal D/o not known to fhe petitioners, aged about 29 years (roU No. 10149) 16 Rajesh Kumar Agrawal S/o not known to the petitioners, aged about 29 yearsfroll No. 10519) 17 Aditi Das S/o not known to the petitioners, aged about 25 years (roll Nb.10558) Respondent No. 3 to 17 C/o Directorate of Medical Education Chhattisgarh, through its Director, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l^ntiL St ^l 5HRI I. Ifrk, ts-.a ' ^ ^ 364/2010 y u r^ ^.j K f^ ii <5 'handaram Patel & others State of Chhattisgarh & others '"•'t.'^fE^T •"'.c- Vinay Pandev, Advocate for the pe+Jtioners. " " A".P.5. Bhatia, Dy. 6ovt. Advocate for the State. /B_--^» <S ,S ¥H ?-.„„. <:3^^ ^S,^ A*y ^sirs®^ s-v^y^ Uuddusi •sor This is the case whers second counsefinq to C.6. Pre-P.6. Course is to be done before 20.6.2010 but the petitioners have raised a auestion that model answers of the questjons out to in the Pre-P.6. • Examination. 2010 are wronq and alternative answers to the same are possibie and thus the evaluation of marks was not made Drooerlv. In ParaaraDh No.8.6 of the petition the petitioners have demonstrated the same and the same is quoted as under:- .z is 1 Answer given 1 whereas tne correcT answer snouia nave an 8?tA^© 42 49. V ^if "c" <& "d-- both- Because relvinci uoon Diseases of ear, nose and throat by PL Dhingr'a 5< Edition, page Mo.98/ Short Te.xt Book of Ent by Santanu Banerjse Page No.92, Logsn Turner s hia».-<!o n-f FM.T 1f!ih p-i.i+inn '".l!"!]" n-f fc/iS'i.'^iJS- W) 'fc^I-^) Atu' l^UIlSU-il, 'k/WlWUI \/i tvmoanic membrane in otosclerosis is FlGrrirnin^o Pink o.'fid PeQrly' Vi/hii^. i ? "None" •^' IRI 1SZ 172 "d" "b" Bscau^e r'alyina uso" Boi'sv & Lovs/s Short Practlce of Surgery, 24 Edition to 1001 and Surgery by Amit Ashish none of the answsrs are suaaestive. •All" BecQuse r®!ylng upon Compiete r'eviAyy of snorT suojecTS Dy Saun-iya snuKlc The vaWif'S./ti^t S i 11 T^ V !L/S» intsrfai-ed by tonque deafness, cleft palate, cleft lip. Similar'iy It 1 - -- - i S0 £ vie nuS Oy©ngiVsn O'y i>QiJsy oi L.OVe S Short Practlce of Sur'aerv. 24 Edition. "d" Becsuss r&lvino UDO" KhurGHG^s 3 Editio?1 at Poqe No.105 and Text Book of Ophfhsirnology by HV Nema A Nitln Nemu 5 Edstjon, at Paae No.316, Petery9ium is Eiastoid dsgeneration of Submucous tissue. Because relying upon Am'if Ashish Nov. 2007, Question No.109; PsyS No.365 and Speed 2007 Nov. 2007, Question No.4, Page No.09, the answer should be none bscQuse ^CG 1-< not oEven. the auestlon Is incompiete and as such the diagnosis eannot bs msde. "a" A "d"- i.,:.^.^. ,.*</»•* l—l*....^:^-!.^ 1S CJ;A.:->u. i Qvii^iUtusavi f^iyitiy upu'ii r^iUsTisutE s,\j £.:uisiufi^ i Paqe No.2614, Parikha 6" Edition Poaa 1 No.lU.41 To 1U.43 fin poinT pupll is wi'th Orl3GyiQ~PhQ£hofu^ es*?l&Jou?ld£ Gnd I well as by Morphine administration. Because relying upon Mudit Khsnnal Ali 1 [ Indla 2006, 4th Edltlon Vol.l, Qusstion | 1 No.284. PQOC No.291 snd ^rnjnQar and 1 ] ^ilison UiagnosiTic Radiology 4'" tdiTion, 1 Page No.238, ths iT.aximurn radiation exposure to the patient is by Bone scan. *b" and "c" Because r'elvinq upon E>utta 6 Edition 1 ~__ ' _ / ~/ __ *. 2004 Page No.479/480, Park 19 Edition pgng Mg 444/445 An'it .Ashish Nov. 2007 1 Page No.362/403. Answer should be ini.iTSPiui uSQTS'iS/1/UUiJ 3iv£ DirTi'i ufiCl maternal death/1,00,000 live birth. -1-1 IBtWHaariiiHSiBit. ^' y f ^\l^ Because r-elyinc uaon Harrisors 16 ' Edition, sage no.1137, h'srrison 15'" Edition, pog® No.1909 Amit Ash'ek No". 2003 O. Mo.109 Poqe No.7'0, the correct answer shouia' be AZT •«• lunilvijulns 'r j.ndinyir 'for 3 ^esks. Because reiying upon Harrison 16 Edition, psge "o.1154-1155 "nd Park 20*1' Edition | Page No.141, Jawetz Edition Paga No.561, | ~ yf fctt\ ^t f t[ ^ E*^/!t ^\^^<hi*tt<4*t^ +^ 41^^ £>' r'-^ 3.' ; W ^-' *' *^J 5.' s.^; • S i IiS ^il f^ OhonTss. This writ petition was taken UD for hearina on 7.5.2010 and six weeks time was allowed to file counter attidavn out todav learned Deouty ffovernment Advocats l"or- the Stute prcys fus' rurther tirris. Howevsr', considsr'ing the deadiin' tixed by 1'he Hon'ble Aoex Court to aive admission i.e. 20,6.2010, it is not possible to grant further time to fiie L. Therefore, at this stage, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the resoondent-State that before conducting osny counsetinq the qrievance of the petitioners, as rajsed in this writ petition, and the answsrs demonstrated by them in Para 8.6 of the petitjon shall be considered and a fair decision shali be taken thereon and only thereafter the counseling will be started. In case, it is found that the Detitioners' averments are correct. the answer sheets shall re-evaluated accordingiy so that no injustice be done with 5. The writ oetition is disoosed of accordinalv. Conseauentiy l.A. No.l aiso stands disoosed of. No order as to costs ^. Certified cooy todav. -—— - Sd/- I-M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge