IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2029 of 2011(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MR.P.V.NATHAN, MANAGER, VIMHS, PALLASSENA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD - 678 681. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD - 678 681. 3. SUDHA.M., W/O.LATE V.SASIDHARAN, ALINPARAMBU, CHERAMANGALAM P.O., PALAKKAD DIST - 678 680. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.2029 Of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF JANUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner prays for a direction to dispose of Exhibit P2 appeal pending before the 1st respondent, challenging Exhibit P1 order. 2. The petitioner appointed as a Full Time Menial with effect from 1.6.2010. The appointment was made in a vacancy which arose due to promotion of one Shri Sankarankutty as Peon. 3. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the Rule 51B claimant was available and it was rejected. 4. The petitioner has averred in the Writ Petition that a dependent of the deceased will be accommodated in the next arising vacancy on 1.6.2011. 4. Since Exhibit P2 appeal is pending, there will be a direction to the Deputy Director of Education to take a decision on Exhibit P2 appeal, after hearing the Manager, petitioner and the 3rd respondent within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of the judgment for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge