IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931 LA.App..No. 523 of 2006() ----------------------------- LAR.95/2003 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR ................................................ APPELLANT: -------------- THE CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS/ CLAIMANTS: ------------------------------- 1. THERSSA JOSEPH, ERINJERI HOUSE, DIVANS ROAD, CHEMBOOKHAVU, THRISSUR. 2. SARA JOSEPH, W/O. K.M. JOSEPH, KONIKKARA HOUSE, MAHILALAYAM JUNCTION, THOTTUMUGHAM ALUVA EAST, ERNAKULAM. 3. M.N. UTHAMAN, LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BHARATHY N. MENON, THEKKEMANNATH POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 4. M.N. LALITHA, LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BHARATHY N. MENON, THEKKEMANNATH POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 5. M.N. REMA, LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BHARATHY N. MENON, THEKKEMANNATH POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 6. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), THRISSUR MUNICIPALITY, THRISSUR. 7. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R3 SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR R3 SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR FOR R3 SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1,4,5 SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR FOR R1,4,5 SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR R1,4,5 SRI.HARISH R. MENON FOR R1,4,5 SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR FOR R1,4,5 SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LATHA T.THANKAPPAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------ L.A.A. No. 523 OF 2006 ------------------------------ Dated this, the 16th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~ Pius C. Kuriakose, J. The appeal is remaining defective on the reason that service of notice is not completed on all the respondents. But, we notice that the issue raised in this appeal filed by the Thrissur Municipality is already covered against the Municipality as well as the Government by judgment of this Court in LAA Nos. 976/2002, 1751/2003, 524/2006, 527/2006 and 573/2006. Hence, we are not inclined to grant time to the appellant to cure the defects. The appeal is rejected. The Registry will refund the full court fee remitted on the appeal memo to the appellant or the counsel for the appellant. (PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) ps