SSNGS-t BENCH (^(^ ^ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHl WRIT PETITION fS) N0.33 ^ /2010. PETITIONER: Nirodft^Iinj, son ofHerman Minj, aged about 40 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Middle School Bakaruma, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents ^v^/// ^' .*' r\ y ^.M"^-" ^<^<^' .-^" ^^ ^ ^•,y- •^' / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. . 2. District Education Officer, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. z 3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury Raigarh, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^n^T^T^prNF (^'cOT 3TI^T sb^i<^ <II*ICT( «1*SI<1» "?^r';:?TraT^R, ^Tl1<ri^<o, [®lcrtl^^< W,/^; ^•^^o/ZolO ^20Q ^T^T XS^K (<i^t^^) l^ifW^fey 3^?T^T SB : Hon'ble Shri IVianindra Mohan 23-06-2010 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, counsej Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lafr advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel appearing petitioner is entitled to benefit of twc| he having passed B.Ed. examinatioil cost. it is submitted that the issue id ionger res integra and the same has| Supreme Court in the case of A^h^ 2009 (!!!} MPJR (SC) 59. it is fijrth^i taken a simiiar view in his W. P. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned c4 attention of this Court to order date<jl No. 124 of 2009, wherein relying upojli in the oase of Asha Saxena (supra) ^i another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, consideratjon of the case for grant| oircular dated 21-09-1974 issued by| verification ofthe facts pieaded in th^ Learned counsel for the petitioner would also be considered «aM<<f<y1<fl^ ^M<A ^f fsl<) '^t$l< ^»'3ffim3?T^T Shrivastava, J, 1 for the petitioner. ^vyer for the State/respondents cn orcEer c|n for the petitioner submits that the advance increments on account of before his appointment at his own ^volved in the present petitjon is no been finally deoided by the Hon'bte v^ of MP. & Ors., !r submitted that this Court has also dated 06-02-2009 passed in )unsei for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court the order passed bythis Court in directions have been issued for of two advance increments as per the State of Madhya Pradesh, after petition. submits that oase of the the same lines. ^nd resbondents /—1,00,000. ^&^-.. ^^. "<^-HC-78 ^^l ^T fqil<^ ^Ts?t 3TT^T 5h^i<^ Tumane ^ *11*«tt W*1ic»» 'S^ ^l^Krt^, yitli-y^Ko, f®l<'ll'M^< . ^t^)^.^W^(^•^200 3n^T Tr9RR' (Ti^3^?) I'^TTW^f^T 3=[T^T 'r- Iri view of the statement disposed of with a direction to the per circular dated 21-09-1974 iss| after verification ofthe facts ptead^ weeks from today. cr»i<iF<rt<fli^TR^yf ^f 'fe1c3t> <p3i^i< ^^tRmSTT^T made above, this petition is finaliy |respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner ^pr grant of two advance increments as ped by the State of Madhya Pradesh, |d in the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r