IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.711 OF 2011 1 Dilip Laxman Pagi 2 Shri Sadanand Kalya Pagi 3 Shri Naresh @ Narottam Kalya Tokre 4 Shri Nalya @ Narayan Kalya Tokre 5 Shri Bhivrya @ Bhimrao Tokre ...Applicants. v/s. The State ..Respondent. Mr. Rajeev Patil i/by S.M.Mirajkar, advs. for the applicants. Ms P.P.Shinde, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 7th September, 2011 PC : 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2 Perused the F.I.R. It appears from the F.I.R. lodged by the widow of the deceased that on 24th March, 2011, the deceased Ramu had told his wife that he was called by the applicant no.1 Dilip and he was going to his house. Saying so, he left the house and never came back alive. On 25th March, attempt was made to contact him but in vain. On 26th March, his deadbody was brought. As per the F.I.R., there were several injuries on his back and his abdomen and face were swollen, blood was oozing and there was foul smell from the body. It indicates that the death had occurred much before the deadbody was brought. In spite of resistance and the objections by the relatives of the deceased, the applicants cremated the body forcibly and thus, evidence of offence, if any, was also destroyed. In these circumstances, crime no.118 of 2011 was registered under Sections 302 r/w section 34 of the IPC. Section 201 may also be applicable. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and the allegations made against the present applicants, I find that it is not fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 3 Application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)