IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2008 / 8TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 31057 of 2007(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ V.R.SANKARAN,VELUTHANGATH HOUSE, AMBALAPPARA P.O.,OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,CIVIL STATION BUILDING,PALAKKAD 2. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PALAKKAD. 3. DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DISTRICT OFFICE, PALAKKAD. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, MABALAPPARA-II, PALAKKAD. 5. DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER EXPLOSIVES, EGMORE, CHENNAI. 6. THOMAS VARKEY, NEDIYAKULAYIL HOUSE, PERUMPAIKKADU,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM THOMAS, CGC SRI.BABY KURIAKOSE SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31057 of 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that Ext.P3 is a no objection certificate granted by the second respondent on the application made by the sixth respondent for establishing a quarry. According to the petitioner, if quarry is established great dander will be caused to him and due to the illegal blasting of granite, extensive damage has already been caused to his residential house. In view of this, petitioner objects to the grant of permit and filed Exts.P4 and P5 before the respondents 1 and 3 opposing the request made by the sixth respondent. In this factual background prayer now sought for is to direct that his objection should also be taken into account when the request for permit made by the sixth respondent is considered. Taking into account the above submission, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the respondents 1 and 3 shall take into consideration Exts. P4 and P5 as and when the application WPC3241/2008 2 for permit made by the sixth respondent for establishing a quarry pursuant to Ext.P3 is taken up for consideration. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before respondents 1 and 3 for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE csl