1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16287 of 2011 1 SUNDARAM 2 SELVAM 3 A.RAMASAMY 4 VELLAIMALAI 5 PICHAIMUTHU 6 SELVAM 7 THANGARAJ 8 KANNAN, S/O.SUNDARAM 9 MEENAKSHISUNDARAM 10 KANNAN, S/O.SUBBIAH 11 KANNAN, S/O.PITCHAI 12 ALAGAN 13 KUPPIYAN 14 MURUGAN 15 ALAGAPPAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE, REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.76/2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.BASKAR MATHURAM Advocate For Respondent :MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 427, 323, 506(ii) and 379(NP) I.P.C in Crime No.76 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2.Heard Mr.S.Baskar Mathuram, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners along with the other co-accused said to have committed theft of paddy worth about Rs.1,20,000/- belonged to the de-facto complainant. He would further submit in his argument that totally nineteen accused in this case and if for any reason this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, suitable conditions may be imposed. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatty and on further condition that each petition shall deposit a sum of Rs.6,316/-(Rupees Six Thousand Three Hundred and Sixteen Only) to the credit of Crime No.76 of 2011 before the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 14/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTY. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.BASKAR MATHURAM Advocate SR.No.43707 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16287 of 2011 Date :14/12/2011 RJ/16.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/