IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-37316 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2011 Sukhbir Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Ms. Sonia Jain, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ashima Mor, APP for U.T. Chandigarh 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 309 dated 17.11.2010 under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC registered at Police Station Sector 11, Chandigarh. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner has not committed any rape, however, the only allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner was driving a car in which Geetanjali was taken. Ms. Ashima Mor, APP U.T. Chandigarh on the instructions of ASI Avtar Singh has argued that since this is a case of abduction and rape and petitioner has played active role, hence, in view of Section 34 IPC petitioner can always be held liable under Section 363, 366-A read with Section 34 IPC. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 14.01.2011 JUDGE reena