IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44831 of 2009 ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY son of Sri Kapileshwar Pandey, resident of vill.- Ghorbanki, P.S.-Basopatti, Distt.-Madhubani----------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 2. 24.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that informant’s name figured in the merit list but he did not turn up for counseling, so he was not appointed. Allegation under sections 386 and 379 is not against this petitioner though for that also there is no corroboration in course of investigation and no case under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. Specifically it is said that some complaint was made by the petitioner against the informant’s father who was working as Post Master and he lost his service basing the allegation true. For that grudge only this case is lodged and petitioner is apprehending his arrest which never can be justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Basopatti P.S. case no.177 of 2008 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )