IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-22210 of 2010 Date of decision: 4.8.2010 Apar Singh ......Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. PRESENT: Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** ORDER The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to the respondents to hand over inquiry / investigation regarding passport of his son to some independent agency as local police is not taking any action in this regard. As per case of the petitioner, his son Vikramjit Singh was issued passport No. A9379623 dated 22.2.2001 and thereafter he left for Spain in the year 2006 and since than he is residing there. The son of the petitioner got permanent citizenship in Spain and passport was surrendered by him at Spain after getting permanent citizenship. The Government of Spain had sent passport of Vikramjit Singh to the Passport Office at Chandigarh for verification but some objection was raised. It has come to the knowledge of the petitioner that FIR has been registered regarding loss of said passport and fresh passport was issued. The petitioner furnished an affidavit to the authority of Regional Passport Office by stating that his son is residing in Crl.Misc. No.M-22210 of 2010 [2] Spain and he had already surrendered his passport and the FIR has been registered by any other person and not by the son of the petitioner. The Regional Passport Officer, Chandigarh had written a letter to the Superintendent of Police Karnal which was marked to SHO P.S.Assand for investigation. Now the present petition has been filed by the petitioner on behalf of his son for handing over investigation to some independent agency as the local police is not investigating the case properly. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to explain how the present petition on behalf of the petitioner is maintainable as he has no cause of action to file the present petition as issue for not conducting investigation by the police relates to his son and it is only the son of the petitioner who is an aggrieved party. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is complainant in this case and has a right to file the present petition but he is unable to show anything on record that the petitioner is complainant in the case. Even on the basis of documents available with the petition, there is only one document i.e. affidavit filed by the petitioner wherein it is mentioned that on the basis of some false police report, a duplicate passport has been issued from the Passport office in the name and address of his son and that passport should be cancelled so that it may not be mis-used. No such communication has been received by the petitioner either from the police or from the Passport Authority to file any affidavit or to supply any information with regard to missing of passport. It is for his son to explain the circumstances with regard to issue of some other Crl.Misc. No.M-22210 of 2010 [3] passport. Since the petitioner has no cause of action for filing the present petition, no direction can be issued in this regard. The petition is dismissed without having any cause of action in this regad. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE August 4, 2010. raghav