IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2769 of 2011 UMESH BIND, SON OF LATE GEETA BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2852 of 2011 ARJUN BIND @ TIMMAL BIND, SON OF JADDU BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.03.2011 Both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases arise out of Matihani P.S. Case No. 77 of 2009 initially registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code but subsequently, Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code was also added and accordingly, both the above stated criminal miscellaneous cases are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, petitioners are not named in the First Information Report and during course of investigation, their names surfaced in this case in confessional statements of co-accused persons. So far as petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 2769 of 2011 is concerned, it is stated that one stolen bicycle and one mobile phone were recovered from his house but the submission of learned counsel for the above stated petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from the house of the petitioner as the seizure list does not bear the signature of either the petitioner or any members of his family. To fortify his contention, he produced certified copy of seizure list dated 25.07.2009. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let both the above stated petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Begusarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 873 of 2010 arising out of Matihani P.S. Case No. 77 of 2009. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )