HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON fQ No. 5622 of2008 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS 2. 3. Chidambra Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd, fliTOugh: Its Director Saiitosh Kumar Agrawal, Aged about 44 years, S/o Late Shri R.D.Agrawal, K7o - 33 Doongaji Colony, Raipur (C.G.) Satish Agrawal S/o Late Sliri Madaii Lal Agawal, Aged about 56 years, R/o Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon (C.G.)/ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretar^", Reveiiue Departmetrt, D.K.S. Bhawaii, Raipur(C.G.) The Collector, Durg (C.G.) The Nazul Officer, Dwg (C.G.) Punjab National Bank, A Body Corporate constituted under Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of andertakin^) Act, 1970 having its Head Qftice at - 7 Ekliaji Conunercial Place, New Delhi, iiiter alia Braneh office at - Kines Way, Nagpur, Througii: Its Braneh Manager, Kuigsvvay, Nagpur(M.S.) Chidambra Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Througii: Its Braach Manager, A Company registered under Companies Act haviiig its Registered office at Nazul Plot No. 22, Firm Land, Ramdaspetli, Nagpur (M.S.) WRIT PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA -,-- Present: SB: Hon-ble Shri Satish K. Aemhotri. J. Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. \'4» (Passed on 21st day of October,.2008) 1. . With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner and fespondent No. 1 to 3, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that fhe petitioners do not want to contest this matter on merits at tlus stage except that the State authorities be directed to consider and deelde. ^sy: itii sw K^Mi !11!1 !'M i!N ES!I! • -2- the pending application dated 01.01.2005 (Annexure P/17) in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Shri Hant leamed Deputy Advocate General for fhe State/respondent No. 1 to 3 subtiuts that the above-stated aDplication shall be considered and ..I. ' ' ' ' decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably wifliia a period of three weeks from the date of receipt offhe a copy ofthis order. 4. In view of the foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitionei, nothing survtYesfor adjudication. J 5. Accordingly,the petition stands disposedof. No order asto costs. 6. Consequently,pendmg applications, ifany, also stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge