In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh FAO No. 505 of 2009 (O&M) Surinder Kumar ... Appellant vs United India Insurance Company Limited and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Gopal Mittal, Advocate, for respondent no. 1. Rajesh Bindal J. Present appeal has been filed by one Surinder Kumar, who is claiming himself to be holding power of attorney of the offending vehicle, against the award of the Tribunal. The Tribunal in the impugned award has burdened respondents no. 1 and 2 in the claim petition, namely, Balwinder Singh and Rattan Lal for payment of compensation on account of accident. It is only on account of the fact that the appellant had filed a written statement admitting that he had purchased the vehicle from respondent no. 2 Rattan Lal on power of attorney that the Tribunal has observed that in case respondent no.2, namely, Rattan Lal, has any claim against the appellant, he may take legal course for that purpose. No fault be found with such an observation made by the Tribunal in the impugned award as the dispute about sharing of burden of claim can always be agitated by the parties in appropriate proceeding. In the present case, the Tribunal has not recorded any definite finding about the liability of the appellant. Dismissed. 8.1.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge