IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4798 of 2010 DHARMPAL RAI, SON OF HARDEO RAI @ HIRDAYA RAI, RESIDENCE OF VILLAGE-MATHWA, P.S. PAKRIDAYAL, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. ………………………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. U.S. Verma, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A.A. Khan, A.P.P. --------- 2. 4.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the informant is the Pramukh of the Panchayat and in the election of Pramukh, the petitioner had contested with the informant. However, due to political rivalry, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is in jail custody since 11.11.2009 and he has not been implicated in any case other than the present case. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Dharmpal Rai, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikarhana at Motihari, in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No.75/2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)