IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 576 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Jitendra Kakkar s/o Late Sri Satyapal Kakkar, 2. Smt. Sheela Kakkar w/o Late Sri Satyapal Kakkar 3. Smt. Vidhi w/o Sri Jitendra Kakkar 4. Lalit s/o Late Sri Satyapal Kakkar, All r/o Madanpuri Colony, P.S. Mandi Saharanpur, District Saharanpur …… Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through S.P. Pauri Garhwal, District Pauri Garhwal. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Kotwali, Kotdwar District Pauri Garhwal. 3. Smt. Rachana d/o Shri Darshan Lal, w/o Shri Tarun Kakkar, at present r/o Govind Nagar, Kotdwar,, P.S. Kotwali, Kotdwar, Distt. Pauri Garhwal ……. Respondents Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Govt. Advocate for respondents 1and 2. None for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri D.K. Sharma, Govt. Advocate for respondents 1and 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Sri Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Jitendra Kakkar, Smt. Sheela Kakkar, Smt. Vidhi and Lalit, seeking stay of their arrest and quashing of the First Information Report, now, has become infructuous as the petitioners after their arrest by the police have been granted bail by the Court concerned. 2. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. With the above order, CLMA No. 5628 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 04.07.2006 04.07.2006 A