-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1662 OF 2008 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 251 OF 2008 Cricket Association of Jharkhand ..Petitioner versus The Board of Control for Cricket in India and others ...Respondents Mr. Naresh Makani, Treasurer of the petitioner is present. Ms. Akhila Kaushik, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Ramchandra Yadav, for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008. P.C. This matter was heard by this Court for some time and today the matter is placed before us for further hearing. However, it is pointed out to the Court by the Treasurer of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the dispute is resolved as per the letter written by Shri Naresh Makani, Treasurer of the petitioner to the Advocate appearing for the petitioner. The said letter is annexed along with the praecipe of the Advocate for the petitioner. -2- 2. Today the Treasurer of the petitioner is present. He has informed that his advocate is sick and that is how he himself has been present. The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 states that he has been informed by his clients that the petitioner is going to withdraw this petition. Learned counsel for the BCCI i.e. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that she identifies the Treasurer of the petitioner who is present today in the Court. 3. Since the petitioner herein wants to withdraw this petition on the ground that the dispute is amicably settled, it is now not necessary to examine the merits of the case. It is also informed that Mr. Tule, Advocate is sick today as he has been hospitalised. On the basis of the praecipe on record as well as on the basis of the letter of the petitioner annexed along with the praecipe as well as considering the say of the Treasurer of the Petitioner Association that he wants to withdraw this petition as the dispute is settled, in our view, now the matter is required to be put to an end by allowing the petitioner to withdraw this petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 4. In view of the disposal of the Writ Petition no orders are required to be passed in Chamber Summons No. 251 of 2008. The same is also accordingly disposed of. -3- P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.