1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4641/2009. Purushottam K. Pagrut -: versus :- Khan Bahadur Kalimkhna Saudagar and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 16, 2010. Heard Shri S.V. Sohini, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Anil S. Mardikar, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2,3 and 5. Authority below has found the documents sought to be summoned not relevant for cross examination at all. The application filed on record for that purpose does not disclose why the records were necessary for cross examination. The Authority below has found that the application was filed only with a view to delay the disposal of the matter. These findings are not shown to be either erroneous or perverse. No case is made out warranting interference in the impugned order. Writ Petition is dismissed, with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.