IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 16TH MAGHA 1928 WA.No. 203 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.1332/2003 .................... APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------ 1. SMT. INDIRA M.B., AGED 42 YEARS, VARUTHUKALA KUDIYIL, EAST KALOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA TALUK, SECRETARY, KALOOR MALIKKAVU DEVI TEMPLE, EAST KALOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA TALUK. 2. SHAJI KUMAR K.M., S/O. KESAVAN, AGED 31 YEARS, KAITHAMATTOM HOUSE, EAST KALLOOR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, MEMBER, KALOOR MALIKKAVU DEVI TEMPLE, EAST KALOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.V.GEORGE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEVASWOM BOARD OFFICE, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, TRIKKARIYOOR GROUP OF TEMPLES, TRIKARIYOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM. 3. LAND TRIBUNAL, THODUPUZHA, NOW FUNCTIONING AT LAND TRIBUNAL OFFICE, TRIPPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 4. RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O. LATE MADHAVAN NAIR, AGED 63 YEARS, THANDAL HOUSE, EAST KALOOR P.O., THODUPUZHA. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC, TDB R2 & R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.R.SABU R4 BY SRI.R.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag.C.J. & ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- W.A.No.203 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. We find no reason to entertain this writ appeal at the instance of two devotees. The challenge in the writ petition was against Ext.P3 order dated 12th September, 1990 passed by the Land Tribunal with the Travancore Devaswom Board in the array of parties. The Travancore Devaswom Board has no grievance against that order. They have not challenged that order. Then we fail to see how they can take up a stand supporting the petitioners. In the circumstances, we find no error in the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge to be interfered by us in this appeal. Writ appeal is dismissed. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, Ag.CHIEF JUSTICE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. vns