IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2009 / 1ST ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 26751 of 2009(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. LIKHITA MALIYAKAL, MALIYAKAL HOUSE, LAOOR ROAD, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. 2. CELIN JOHN KEETTIKKEL, KEETTIKKEL HOUSE, CHEMMANDA, P.O.KARALAM, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV.MR.T.MADHU. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.26751 of 2009 - L ---------------------------------------- Dated 23rd September, 2009 Judgment Heard Sri.Madhu T., the learned counsel appearing for the petitoiner and Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut. 2. The first petitioner appeared for the eighth semester B.Tech. degree examination in Computer Science and Engineering and the second petitioner appeared for the eighth semester B.Tech. degree examination in Electronics and Communication Engineering conducted by the University of Calicut in June, 2009. The results were published in August, 2009. The first petitioner failed in the paper 'Computer Architecture and Parallel Process' and the second petitioner failed in the paper 'Micro Electronic Technology'. They have therefore applied for revaluation of their answer scripts by submitting Exts.P1 and P2 applications. The petitioners submit that they have passed all the other examinations. It is stated that the first petitioner has been selected for appointment as Software Engineer in L & T Infotech Limited. It is also stated that the second petitioner intends to pursue higher studies. They submit that they W.P. © No.26751/2009 2 are sure to secure a pass if their answer scripts are revalued and that unless their answer scripts described in Exts.P1 and P2 applications are revalued and the results communicated to them expeditiously, they will be put to serious prejudice. 3. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, the learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut submits that the University will revalue the petitioners’ answer scripts in the concerned subjects if their applications are in order and they have paid the prescribed fee and communicate the results to them within eight weeks from today. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to revalue the petitioners’ answer scripts described in Exts.P1 and P2 applications and to communicate the results to them within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge vaa