CWP No. 921/2011 31.08.2011 Present: Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A. G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G for respondent No.2. There is no dispute that petitioner is enrolled as a Voter and voter card has been issued in her favour by the Election Commission of India (Annexure P-1). In fact, Executive Magistrate, Shimla has issued a certificate of bonafide Himachali (Annexure P-2) in her favour. These documents have not been challenged by any person so far. Authorities have also not taken any action of reviewing them. As such, stand taken by the respondents in their reply that petitioner is a Nepali citizen is factually incorrect and not based on any tangible and cogent material. 2. According to the petitioner, respondent No.1 has not adopted any independent Policy of regularization and Policies as framed by the State are being adopted and implemented. There is nothing on record to substantiate this fact. In this view of the matter, it is open for the petitioner to approach respondent No.1 placing on record the various decisions rendered by this Court, including Man Singh vs. State of H.P., C.W.P No.1594/2008, wherein similarly situated persons, in the departments of the State stand regularized on the basis of various policies framed by the State. 3. As and when any such representation is received by respondent No.1, the same shall be considered and dealt with in accordance with law, justice and equity within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. Needless to add, before passing any reasoned order, petitioner shall be associated. 4. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed off. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. August 31, 2011 (rana)