IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A. No. 491 of 2011 Date of Decision: 01.09.2011 Pawan Verma ........Appellant vs. State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the appellant 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. Kumar, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 8.7.2010 rendered by learned Single Judge holding that the quota for backward class category was 5% till year 1991 and it was increased to 10% for the aforesaid category. In so far as the appellant is concerned in the examination of HCS(Judicial) his name figured below the name of the selected candidates namely respondent No. 1 who was at Serial No. 53. It was pointed out by the respondent in their affidavit that one Lal Singh whose name figured at Serial No. 51 and belonged to Backward Class was also not given appointment. The name of the appellant was much lower, therefore, no direction could have been issued. Keeping in view the aforesaid finding, we ask learned counsel for the appellant to point out any illegal infirmity in the view L.P.A. No. 491 of 2011 2 taken by learned Single Judge. However, he could not successfully dispute the finding recorded by learned Single Judge. Thus, we find no merit in the instant appeal and the same does not warrant admission. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) 01.09.2011 JUDGE reena