Q PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Writ Petition U A 26 of the Constitution of India 3.3. HON’BLE SHRI DHIRE. DRA MISHRA, J. 17.09.2008 Shn' Santosh Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sac, Govt. ' dvocate for the State] respondent No. 1. r\\ W.’. C No.1839 2008 Smt. Saraswati Devi Rameshri, W/o Shri Sudarshan Ramcshri, aged about 31 years, RIO Village Chandragali, Pratapganj, Tahsil garh, Disirict—Raigarh (Chhatn'sgarh) Versus of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Educah'on Department, D.K.S. Kul Sachiv. Pd. Sunder Lal Shanna Bilaspur tisgarh) Vishwavidyalaya, Kulaihipati, Pd. Sunder Lal Shanna (Mukta) Vishnavidvalava, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Regi‘trar, Pd. Sunder Lal vShaxma (Mukta) Vish avidyalaya, Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) Manoj Sharma, concerned employee, Pd. Suder Lal ShamalMukta) Vishwavidyalaya Bilas pur (Chhattisgarh) ' t WW W200 mm(§i§a§u) / mmmm mweww $aifaum WW, $9?i FF QJ W @ Wm m zoo mm (new) mmm ’2’. www1$mwm aaamm Heani 011 LA. No.3, app] writ peti1ion. Learn€d counsel for the I above pormission is granted to In View of the above, Petitioner is permitted to withdl Accordingly, the petition : ication for permission to withdraw the espondent/ State has no objection if the me petitioner. the application (I.A.No.3) is allowed. aw the petition. is dismissed as withdrawn. 8d]- Dhirndra Mishra e i Judge