IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15750 of 2008 Megh Nath, S/o Late Ramu Sao, resident of Mohalla- Janakpur, P.S. Mofasil, District-Gaya………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Department of Industry, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, New Secretariate, Patna-1.. 2. The Director, Department of Industry, Bihar at Patna, New Secretariate, Patna-1. 3. The General Manager, District Industry Centre,Gaya. 4. The Accountant General, Bihar at Patna, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-1. …………………Respondents. ----------- 2. 27. 07. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Respondent State. It is submitted that petitioner before coming to this Court has represented before the Department vide his letter dated 13. 11. 2007 as contained in Annexure-7. However, the grievance of the petitioner remained unconsidered by the department. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a fresh representation before Respondent No.1, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent No. 1. In case, such a fresh representation is filed before Respondent No. 1 with relevant documents in support thereof as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 1 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner in 2 accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation, so that the claim as raised in his representation could be redressed without any delay. With the above observations/directions, the writ application is disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)