1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 11/2009 IN W.P. NO. 3758/2007 (DECIDED) (Shankarrao Rangrao Patkar VERSUS Chandrakant Borse & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.C. Madkholkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.G. Wankhede, counsel for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 2, 2009. Shri V.G. Wankhede, the learned counsel for the respondents, has submitted the affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1 in the Court, today. The same is accepted on record. It is stated in the affidavit that the representation was submitted by the petitioner on 11.12.2007, which was received by the respondent on 14.12.2007. The said representation was forwarded to the Central Office situated at Mumbai. It is further stated in the affidavit that due to some communication gap, the services of the petitioner came to be mistakenly terminated on 24.01.2009. The petitioner is, however, reinstated in service by an order dated 07.02.2009. 2 The petitioner has also joined the services on 07.02.2009. Because of the mistake committed on behalf of the respondents, the respondents have also tendered an unconditional apology to this Court. After considering the submissions made on behalf of the respondent no.1, it is clear that the respondents have not deliberately flouted the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court on 28.11.2007 in Writ Petition No.3785/2007. In the result, the notice issued to the respondents on 22.01.2009 stands discharged. The proceedings against the respondents are not continued any further and are hereby dropped. The contempt petition is disposed of. JUDGE APTE