IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 994/2009 [Abhijeet Anandrao Wanjari vs. Sunal Madhukarrao Samarth and another.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 18 th JUNE, 2009 Heard Shri C.S.Kaptan, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. None present for respondent no.1 though served. Shri Sonare, APP, appears for respondent no.2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the cheque was issued by the respondent no.1 in consideration with the dissolution of the partnership firm i.e. deed dated 25.11.2007, which was later on dishonoured. According to him, the reasons recorded by the learned trial Judge that, as there was no closure of the partnership bank account, there was no liability on the part of respondent No.1, ex facie, does not appear to be sound inasmuch as the cheque was issued by respondent no.1 in pursuance to the said dealing and that too from the private account. Arguable points are raised. Hence, leave to appeal granted. List the appeal on 23/6/2009. JUDGE Rvjalit