Court No.2 Writ Petition No. 93 (M/S) of 2003 Santa Ram Ghai ........... Petitioner. Versus Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge (Sr. Division)/F.T.C.-1, Dehradun and another. ........... Respondents. .................................... Hon'ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri Gopal Narian, learned counsel for the petitioner. The application of the petitioner under Section 21 of the Rent Control Act is lying undecided and the case has been adjourned on the dated fixed on one pretext or the other for about eight months. Eight months have left. The respondent has not filed written statement because easily he cold seek adjournment on account of the delay in disposal of the application. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved, has filed this writ petition seeking writ of mandamus to command the Prescribed Authority to proceed in accordance with law so that the application may be decided on merits expeditiously. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Prescribed Authority/ Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun is directed to decide P.A.Case No. 34 of 2002 within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of finally. (P.C. Verma, J.) 20.02.2003 P.Singh