N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A ILASPU WRIT PETITIONS) NO. W$% OF 201 0 PETTOR: IINE ~ : :- sgii f iniereené ars1 arm gc bout— 2 Year o Dr K harma R/o— Qrt o 0 Belnd Footbal ouse Square VERSU "S- ar-u anagng irector, Nationa Mineral eveloment Corporatio Ld, imite KHA HAN" 31 l Masa Tank Hderaba ( P ) A RESPONDENT(S) 1. -: irecto atlo Xecu Persone inal orporat1o HANIJ BHAA 1 /A Masa derabad (A P '0—‘- an enlor Personnel ra eVelopme rporaon imited HANIJ BV".. — ll/A , Masb yderabad A P ienera nge ), BI‘VOIM‘ :Baché omplex, So th Basta antewadaC G ' ’I T BR Hht Sha Ad, » “A 5 s, S/ " B S N 52 h l- H V I P under Nagar Dlst “S t “Rp (C ) alur G ChiCm- Mi D l " Dp n “NIJ BVA 10 3 /A b yd Dr Nncil‘ .5 EtiVe ‘ (nl), Mer Cn ~ " “K VN" 3 1 b Hy ) 13 Tk,“ t 3 S (), Mmel Dnt' Coti s L »»“K HAAN, 103: ‘ 3 a Tank, H ( ) tGl Mar, > ,S li C 1 Di ) IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THI _ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R I 'V * ‘‘ \ . WMeJN..5. f0 ‘ Hi 200 WTW ' m was (Wm mmm Wqw1§wm $afmem€w s.B: HON’ELE JUSTICE MR. PRa TINKER DIWAKER 27-08-2010: Shri Vinay Pandey, counse! Shri P.S. Koshy, Advoca Mineral Development Corporatio. behalf of the respondents. ' Ljmited grievance of th (Annexure P-4 to P—7) are pendi ends of Justrce would be served renresentatron before the sara re have been rarsed In the present p drrected to decrde the sard repres law. The petition is disposed eventuatity of fiting any such r respondent No. 4 raising ail his‘ respondent to decide the same or of the case, as expeditiousiy as po it is made ciear that this merits of the case and the authori the application strictly in accordan for the petitioner. e, who normally appears for Nationai ‘Limited is directed to accept notice on petitioner is that the representation q before the respondent Nor 4 and the f the petitioner 's permitted to file fresh pondent raisrng ail his grievance which trtron and in turn the respondents may be ntation expeditiousiy in accordance wun of with the aforesaid direction. ln the esentation by the petitioner before the grievance, it is expected from the said :nsidering ail the factuai and iegai aspect ssibie. Sourt has not expressed any opinion on ‘ry concerned wouid .pe at iibeity to decide :e with law. w e. r i