IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 17662 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.09.2011 Bharat Bhushan ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. K.V. Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that vide order dated 7.4.2010, Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Samrala, has finalized partition proceedings and consequently, Sanad of partition was prepared on 8.11.2010 and warrants of possession were issued on 15.12.2010, therefore, Bailiff is duty bound to execute the warrants of possession. Learned counsel states that the petitioner has already moved representations (Annexure P/4) before respondents No. 2 and 3, however, no action has been taken thereon, as yet, therefore, they be directed to take decision on the representations (Annexure P/4) within such time as fixed by this Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merit as well as on the maintainability of the representations (Annexure P/4), respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are directed to take decision thereon within60 days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before them, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 20.09.2011 som