IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40121 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR PRASAD @ AJAY KUMAR, son of Sunil Kumar Prasad, resident of village Maiki, P.S. Garkha, District Saran Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The allegation against the petitioner u/s 414 of the Indian Penal Coder in view of recovery of the motorcycle from his conscious possession cannot be disbelieved only because the petitioner feels that there was also one another co- accused Pappu Khan, who was the person behind the said occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 22.8.2009 and as the cognizance in a case triable by a Magistrate has already been taken on 8.9.2009, this Court would direct the court below to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is completed in a period of next nine months so that the same comes to an end within a period of one year from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. If the trial of the petitioner would not be completed in the aforementioned period the petitioner will have the liberty initially 2 to move the trial court which will then give reasons for not concluding the trial, only whereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this Court. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/