CRM-M No.12887 of 2011 (O&M) *** Gurmeet Kaur and another Vs. State of Haryana and another Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the complainant. **** This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case F.I.R. No.47 dated 23.03.2011 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Rori, District Sirsa. The broad brush allegations against the petitioner No.1 are that she sold the land to the respondent No.2 even though she had earlier transferred it in favour of her daughter. On the last date of hearing the following order was passed:- “Service is complete. Since this matter relates to the family members, learned counsel requests to intervene and push for settlement. Both the learned counsel have graciously agreed to act as mediator and to push for a settlement. In this situation, it would be appropriate to adjourn the case to 02.06.2011. Interim order to continue.” CRM-M No.12887 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are ready to pay not only the money which was taken by them i.e. `3,50,000/- rather ready to pay a sum of `50,000/- over and above the said amount but the respondent No.2 should handover the possession to them. The respondent No.2 on the other hand had earlier stated before this Court that neither she is ready to handover the possession nor she is willing to take any money. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. In the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of SHO/Investigating Officer subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) June 02, 2011 JUDGE ashish