IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2879 of 2011 Date of decision: 2.5.2011 Joga Singh and another … Petitioners versus Gram Panchayat, vill. Sailkiana, the. & Distt. Ludhiana, through its Sarpanch … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate, for the petitioners ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioners had filed petition under Section 11 of the Punjab Village Common Lands(Regulation) Act,1961, for declaration to the effect that petitioner No.1 is owner in possession of the land detailed in the petition. They concluded evidence. Respondent submitted an affidavit by way of evidence which led the present petitioners to file an application under Order 6 rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for amendment of the petition. The application has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 25.11.2010 passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner(Development)-cum-Collector, Ludhiana. Hence, this revision. Heard. The present petitioners had filed application under Order 6 rule 17 read with Section 151, Code of Civil Procedure, for amendment of the plaint. No notice thereof has been issued to the opposite side. The impugned order indicates that nothing has been discussed as to what had been pleaded in the application filed by the petitioners. The order is absolutely non-speaking and liable to be set aside. It is ordered accordingly. The case is remitted back to the concerned Authority to pass a speaking C.R. No. 2879 of 2011 -2- order after hearing both the parties, without being influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. May 2, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE