HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI§GARH AT BILASPUR Singie Bench :‘Hon’bie Shri Jagdish Bhalla, Ag Chief Justice. Writ Petmon No.605 of 2003 Petitionets 1) Mahehdra Kumar Sonkar, aged about. 81 (30) years 2) Shailendra Kumar Sonkar, aged abcut 29 (20) years 3) Satyendra Kumar Sonkar, aged about 27 (25) years AH are son of Shri Manaram Sunkar, resident of Sonkar Para, Lohar Ghowm Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus 1) Smt Milwantin Bai aged about 67 (66) yers, wife of Shri Bisram Sonkar, resident of Lakhenagar, Purani Basti, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Smt Ratiyawan bai (died on 14.09 2000) Through substituted legal represeritative on strength of impugned order Makhaniai ’Sonkar, aged about>45 years, Sio Shri Vishram Sonkar R/o‘Sonkarpara, VRaipur (CG) - Smt Geeta Devi Agrawal, aged about 67 (66) years, wife of Snri Ramdayai Agrawai 4) Hari Ballabh Agrawal, aged about 30 (29) i years, son of Shri Ramdayai Agrawai, Respondents ‘2) 3) SI No.3 & 4 are residerrt of Qtr No.323-A, Sundar Nagar Raipur (Ohhattisgarh) 5) the Conestor, 'District Raipur (CG) 6) AP Kindo, Additional Collector, Distt Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Present: Shri Avinash Mlshra, counsel for the petitioners. ORAL ORDER (Passed onrzs“ Jury, 2007) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the Civil Suit itself has been disposed of, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infruotuous. SCI/- Acting Chief Justice '