IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2007 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 4764 of 2006(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- N. SASIDHARAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. NANU, RESIDING AT PANAVILAKIZHAKETHIL, MANAMPUZHAMURI, KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUR. 5. THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KOLLAM. 6. SHRI CHANDRA BABU, CHANDRALAYAM, MANAMPUZHA, KUNNATHUR VILLAGE. 7. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SASTHAMCOTTA. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) for R6 SRI.P.SREEKUMAR ) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/03/2007, THE COURT ON 29/03/2007 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.4764/2006 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 19/10/2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF ORDER NO.A-6189/05 DTD. 16/11/2005 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: COPY OF LETTER DTD. 16/12/2005 SENT BY PETITIONER TO ADDITIONAL THAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUR. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 19/01/2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. 6TH RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R6(1): COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BYTHE 6TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.R6(2): COPY OF THE ORDR NO.LRA4-12694/2006 DTD.13/10/2006. EXT.R6(3): COPY OF THE MODIFIED ORDER 23/12/06 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE. /TRUE COPY/ KSS THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No. 4764 OF 2006-P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of March, 2007. JUDGMENT Petitioner's complaint is that Ext.P2 order of the Revenue Divisional Officer under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order is not being enforced. As of now, by Ext.R6(2), that order stands stayed in a statutory appeal before the Land Revenue Commissioner. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of without entering on merits and leaving open all contentions, however, directing that the Land Revenue Commissioner shall finally decide the matter within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/-