HIGH COURT OF CNNATTISGARH. BILASPUR t CONTEMFTCASE (Ci No.34/2010 PETITIONER R6SPONDENT Surendra Singh Thakur, S/o Mahipal Singh Thakur, ags about 53 y©ars, R/o Bairagpara, Pandaria, Distnct Kawardha (C.G.) y@rsus R.K. Sjngh, Its Dlrector, C.G. Agriculture Vipanan Board Rapur (CX3J APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12 OF CONT6MPT OF COURTACT Appeararsce: Mr. S.P. Kate, Counsel forthe petitioner Mr. Yashwant Singh ThaRur, Counsei for the resporident ORALOROER (28.09.2810$ SUNIL KUIVIAR SINHA. J. Learned counsel forthe petjtipner submlts that he is not pressing I.A No01/2010,an appiication for wtthdrawal of the contempt petjtion filed on behalf ofthe petitjoner I.A No.01/2010, therefore, te dtemissed, as not pressed Heard Petjtioner- Surendra Singh Thakur has flled thls petitlon for in'rtiatjon of proceedings of cpntempt against the respondent, Who is working as Mlanaging Director of C.G State Agricultural Marketjng Board, Raipur. Learned counse) for the respondent submits that now> the respondent has been transferred and the representstion was not decided by him, because, it was not addressed to the respondent, However. he submits that the representatjon dated 08.08 2009 (Annexure A-2) shall be brought to the nottee ofthe present Managing Director so that he may decide it as per directions of thte Court passed in W.P.(S) No.3604/2009 on 20.072009 ~\ ^SK^! CONTEMPT CASE (C\ No.34/2010 I/i In view of the above submissions made at bar, tearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permissjon to withdraw ttite petition at this stage with IJbertyto fite anothercontempt petjtion jf such an exigency arises in ftjture Permission granted. Accordingly, the cqntempt case is dispQsed of at thjs ^age, as wlthdrawn, with the aforesaid llberty granted in favour of the petltipner —— Certifjed copy iasperrules. I Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge