IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.18176 of 2008 Date of Decision : September 21, 2011. Bakhshish Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Maninder Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel has filed an additional affidavit of Parmod Kumar, District Education Officer (S.E.), Patiala, in compliance to the order dated 25.7.2011, stating therein that after an enquiry, it has been found that the petitioner never worked in the Institution from where the alleged 'experience certificate' has been obtained. In other words, the experience certificate relied upon by the petitioner is not genuine. In this view of the matter, no weightage/additional marks for the alleged experience can be awarded to the petitioner. The resultant effect would be that the petitioner's merit has to be treated as 57.820 putting him as the last selected candidate in the reserved category of Scheduled Caste CWP No.18176 of 2008 [2] (Ramdasia). In case the petitioner is entitled for appointment as per the said merit, then his claim shall be considered, otherwise he cannot claim appointment as a matter of right. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 21, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE