IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10769 of 2011-G. Decided on: December 12, 2011. Smt. Vinod KUmari, S/o Sh. R.B. Gautam, resident of VPO Panjehra, Tehsil Nalagarh, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of H.P. through Secretary (Elementary Education) Govt. of H.P. Shimla-2. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shinmla. 3. The Deputy Director of Elementary Education, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh. …….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in her favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. & anr. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 2 Needless to say, that the eligible consequential benefits shall also be disbursed within the said period. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th December, 2011. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (vs) Judge.