-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3738 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.3738 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.3738 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.2038 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.2038 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.2038 OF 2007 Resham Singh Pyarasingh ...Applicant vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation ...Respondent Mr.I.M.Vohra i/b Mr.Bipin Joshi for the Applicant Mr.J.J.Xavier for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 26, 2008. : MARCH 26, 2008. : MARCH 26, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. The Advocate for the Respondent pointed out that by a communication dated 13th February 2008 the Respondent-Corporation has informed the Architect of the Applicant that the proposal for regularisation submitted by the Applicant on 16th October 2007 has been rejected. An office copy of the said communication has been produced for perusal of the court. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant seeks time to take further steps. 3. Considering the findings recorded by the trial court and considering the rejection of the proposal for regularisation, no case is made out for grant of interim relief. Hence, Application is rejected. However, to enable the Applicant to take further steps in the matter, ad-interim order passed on 10th September 2007 will continue to operate for a period of 12 weeks from today. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE