IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.173 of 2011 PINTU KUMAR @ AJAY @ PINTU MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 02/ 02.02.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in para 12 of this application date of custody of the petitioner has wrongly been typed as June, 2010 in place of 9.8.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction within the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Neither petitioner is named in the first information report nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge I, Gaya that name of this petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Zahid Ansari. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioner Pintu Kumar @ Ajay @ Pintu Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Roushanganj P.S. Case no. 23/2005. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)