6. appa 494-11.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 494 OF 2011 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 1550 OF 2004 Vikas Rangrao More .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent None for the Applicant Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & M.N. GILANI, JJ. DATE : 28th APRIL, 2011. PER COURT: 1. This is an application which was sent by the applicant through jail. Accordingly, advocate Ms. Sangita Bhole came to be appointed as a counsel to represent the applicant in this application. Unfortunately, the learned counsel who had been appointed on behalf of the applicant was absent when this application was on board on 21st April 2011. This Court had adjourned the hearing of the application for today. Today also, when this application is called out for hearing, unfortunately, the counsel who had been appointed to represent the applicant is absent. 1 6. appa 494-11.doc 2. With the assistance of the learned APP, we have perused the application as well as the judgment of the trial Court under which the applicant came to be convicted. The learned APP points out that the applicant had earlier filed Criminal Application No. 7184 of 2005 praying for similar relief which came to be dismissed by this Court. Subsequently also, the applicant had filed Criminal Application No. 357 of 2006 which came to be dismissed. In the light of dismissal of earlier two applications, the learned APP submits that the present application which is a third application for bail is liable to be rejected. The appeal of the applicant is on board for final hearing. 3. Accordingly, we dismiss this application. [ M.N. GILANI, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 6. appa 494-11.doc 3