1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 107 of 2009 IN Criminal Appeal No. of 2009 [The State of Mah. Vs. Jaiprakash J. Bhadke & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for appellant. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 19th April, 2010. 1. This is an appeal against acquittal. 2. Heard learned APP Mr. S.S. Doifode for the appellant. 3. Admittedly, there are two Dying Declarations and there is variation in those. 4. This ground weighed before the Sessions Judge, creating suspicion about genuineness of the imputations leading to the offence under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code. 5. It is also seen that allegation of ill- treatment on account of dowry-related demands is also not proved. 6. The Judgment impugned is based on 2 appreciation of evidence and sound reasons. 7. It is not shown that the reasons are illegal, or the judgment is rendered without taking into account material on record. 8. In the result, appeal has no merit, and is rejected. Judge |Hedau|