IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24978 of 2003 Between : K. Swarna latha W/o Naga Sesha Reddy Proddatur Municipality, R/o Proddatur, Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairperson, Proddatur Municipality, Proddatur, Kadapa District 2 The Commissioner, Proddatur Municipality, Proddatur, Kadapa District 3 The Director of Municipal Administration, Hyderabad. 4 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent in rejecting the requisition notice of the petitioner for holding requisition meeting on 29-11-2003 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to Rule 5 of G.O.Ms.No. 1369 dt. 18-11-1965 and Rule 3 of Schedule-I of the Rules regarding proceedings of the Council. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 : MR.S.I.NEWTON Counsel for Respondents 3 & 4 : GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER : When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 21st July 2009 ajr