IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO: 14636 of 2004 Between: V. Praveenkumar S/o. Yellaiah R/o. H.No.5-8-124/81/1, Narayanareddy Colony, Sangareddy, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal, Jawahar Navodya Vidyalaya, (Under Ministry of Human Resource Dept.,), Vergal, Medak District-502279. 2 The Employment Officer, District Employment Exchange, Medak at Sangareddy. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear for the written test and interview for the post of Store Keeper which are schedule to be held on or after 20.8.2004 without insisting his name from the Employment Exchange sponsorship. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RAMGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING The Court at the stage of admission made the following: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO.14636 OF 2004 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court through this Writ Petition mentioning that the respondent is proposing to fill up one vacancy of Store Keeper and that the respondent requested the Employment Exchange to sponsor 20 candidates for the purpose of selection of one of those candidates, and that as the respondent failed to give wide publicity of publishing in newspapers and all media, caused any amount of prejudice to the petitioner. Therefore, he requests that a direction shall be given to the respondent to permit the petitioner to sit in the examination proposed to be conducted by the respondent. 2 . The petitioner did not furnish any details as to when the post was notified, when the Employment Exchange was addressed and when the test is going to be held etc., except an oral representation. Unless it is made out that the proposal made by the respondent is in gross violation of the existing Rules, the Court is not supposed to interfere with the said process. 3. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. -------------------------------- Dr. G.YETHIRAJULU, J 19th August, 2004 SKM TO 1 The Principal, Jawahar Navodya Vidyalaya, (Under Ministry of Human Resource Dept.,), Vergal, Medak District-502279. 2 The Employment Officer, District Employment Exchange, Medak at Sangareddy.mngaeda. 3 Two C.Cs. to G.P. for Employment and Training High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, (OUT) 4 Two C.D. Copies.