1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.1734 of 2008. [Doma S/o Warlu Patil and others] Vs. [Gopichand S/o Bhijaji Gajbhiye and another] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. Raisuddin, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 29th April 2008. 1. In a suit filed by Wachala against Doma and others whether she has prayed certain reliefs, present respondent no.1. 2. After the death of Wachala, the respondent has applied for being brought as legal heir. 3. It is not denied that the respondent is the real brother of the husband of Wachala. Admittedly, Wachala has died intested without leaving class-I heirs. 4. The petitioners are not abler to dispute that the respondentnno.l 2 would be the legal representative, yet the dispute are opposing respondent's application for being brought on record as legal heirs, and are challenging the Order below Exh.24 allowing the respondent's application for being brought on record as legal representatives. 5. The petitioners admit that Doma the petitioner no.1 who is the father of the petitioners no.22 & 3 is the maternal uncle of Wachala the deceased. 6. On the very face of it, the petition has no merit. It is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm