IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.33 of 2009 KAPIL DEVI, wife of Sukh Dev Rai, resident of village- Bramhpur Pul, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran ----- Appellant Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ganga Rai, son of late Lalji Rai 3. Deenanath Rai, son of Murat Rai 4. Khedan Rai, son of Ganga Rai 5. Shambhu Rai, son of Gaga Rai 6. Murat Rai, son of late Roshan Rai All resident of village- Bramhpur Pul, P.S.- Bhagwanbazar, District- Saran. ------ Respondents ----------- 3 27.3.2009 This appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 17.9.2008 passed in Trial No. 446 of 2008 wherein the opposite parties were acquitted of the charges under Sections 323/34, 324/34, 341/34, 427/34 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Court below has made a wrong interpretation of all the evidence laid in the Court and, therefore, the S.L.P. should be allowed. It is well settled law and no judgment is required to substantiate the principle that even if the appreciation of the evidence has been made in a particular manner, it cannot be said that just because a different interpretation can be made with respect to the evidence led the judgment is perverse or 2 illegal. In the facts of this case, I find that the witnesses P.W. 1, 2 and 3 have not supported the manner of the occurrence and there are discrepancies in their evidence which has led the Court to come to the conclusion that the case has not been proved. Learned counsel further submits that I.O. and the Doctor has not been examined and the Court could not have acquitted the opposite parties on the basis of this fact. On perusal of the evidence, I find that the injury has not been produced and there is nothing to show that in fact any injury was caused. Even with respect to the allegation that they had cut the neck of a goat during the occurrence, witnesses have stated differently with respect to this version of the prosecution case. In any event, I do not find that the judgment of acquittal is perverse or illegal. In the result this application for special leave to appeal is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)