33W, mar, mm Wm..H.-Qu£®%h&l/ 200;! u ‘ mmm mm#wmn 3m§wanéw ’ LO of delay in filing the appéal as delay of 8O days. The ground taken by the‘ Puran Singh Dhruv, 8/0. Keju Ram Dhruv, Aged about 31 yrs, R/o. Vin. Rajankota, Post Panama, Distt. Raipur (CG) Dulesh Verma, S/o, Kishan Verma, R70. Bagadaipara, P‘S. Nayapara, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) SmL Rita Devi Singh Thakur, W/o. Arvind SinghThakur, R/o. B-l, Gayatri Vihar Purena Raipur, Tah 3r, Distt. Raipur (CG) The New InSurance C0. Ltd‘, By Divisional Manager, Kachahari, ( Dhirendra Mkh‘ra, J. 03.05.2007 Shri S.C.Verma, counsel for the appellant. Shri Sudhir Agrawai, counsel for respondent No.3. Heard on MICP. Nol 1636/2006 application for condonation [he appeal has been preferred with a Jail Road, Raipur Distt Raipur CG) appellant for condoning the delay is that the appellant was not possessed of sufficient funds and was also not aware that the appeal was to be filed Within the specific period. Reasons assigned for delay by the appellant is not sufficient. Evan otherwise from perusal 0f the appellant sustaihed injurie the same h been assssEd at the impugned award i: appears that s in the motor vehicle accident and 0% on the basis of certificate issued W as e 5 APPELLANT VERSUS RESPONDENTS ‘ l XI-HC-22 mm mm MA CesNa WI/ 200G .............-........ .... .mo n... .... .‘u .. .. . . ..... r ‘ “Emma _ _L ‘ WWiiwm l wmanaa‘ by the Medical Board and a su 11 of Rs. 2,13,500/v has been awarded to the apiéellant. The Tribunzl afmr assessing the loss ‘of earning capacity of the deceased lat Rs. 70/— per day and after applying multiplier 01' ‘17 has computed the payable compensation to the appellant which appears to be just and proper in accordance With Mx fewe; law and no case for enhanceinent is made out. The appeal being deyoid of substance is liabie to be dismissed and. is hereby dismissed. sdk— w ’ i Dhirendra Mishra Jude . g