IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25684 of 2009 RAGHUNANDAN THAKUR @ RAGHUNATH THAKUR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 19.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Allegation of taking of money was for mutating complainant’s name in demand register. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no document to establish the payment. Further, it is submitted that a revenue karamchari has no hand in mutation of name of a tenant rather it is done by the Circle Officer on the report of Circle Inspector. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 521C of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned R.K. Chaudhary, J.M., Ist Class, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)