IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 554 of 2002 Satish Chandra Jain .……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & Another .………. Respondents Present: Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for the respondents. Date of decision: 05-03-2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact, that the Government Order dated 30.08.2001 has since been set aside. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the factual position asserted at the hands of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 05.03.2010 05.03.2010 Amit