IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27718 of 2008 Between: S.Yellaiah, S/o. Late S.Parvathamma, R/o. H.No.19-67, Gandhi Nagar,Badepally, Jadcharla Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Zonal Manager Food Corporation of India No.2, Haddows Road, Chennai. 2 The Senior Regional Manager Food Corporation of India Regional Office: Hyderabad. 3 The District Manager Food Corporation of India Tarnaka, Mahaboobnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that proceedings issued in Lr.No.Estt.39 / 1/ 2006-PC, dt. 3-7-2006 rejecting the case of the Petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds as is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and violative of Article 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and further declare that petitioner is entitled to be considered for appointment on compassionate grounds. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondents: B.ANJANEYULU(SC FOR FCI) The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings, dated 03.07.2006, issued by the respondents, wherein the petitioner’s application for compassionate appointment was rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.18119 of 2006 and batch, dated 25.09.2008, and this writ petition can be disposed of in terms thereof. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has also agreed for the same. While allowing W.P.No.18119 of 2006 and batch, this Court observed as under: “Accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside directing respondents to re- consider the cases of the petitioners for providing compassionate appointment after issuing notice to the petitioners and pass appropriate orders as per the Scheme, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners.” Hence, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above judgment. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Dated:19.12.2008 GJ