[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2685 OF 2008 Shri.Shivaji Shankarrao Kale ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.M.S.Mohite advocate for applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant states that at present the applicant has not been directed to remain present before the Sessions Court, hence, he seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application at a later stage if directions are given to the applicant to remain present before the Sessions Court at the time of hearing of his anticipatory bail application. 3. Application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]