K HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.,(C)No.4184of2007 Petitioner : Panchram Banjare, S/o. Late Chaitram ^ed about 41 years, R/o. Kumhari, P.0. & P.S.H. Kumhari Distt. Durg tChhattisgarh] Respondents Versus 1. 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.] Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. Sub-Divisional Officer [Revenue] Durg, Distt. Durg [C.G.l (Petition under Articles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Aanjhotri Present Shri J.K.Shastri, counset for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on 19 July, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made an application to the Secretary, Revenue Department, Govemment of Chhattisgarh for grant of "Bhumi Swami Right on Kotahwari Land" on 24.05.2007 (Annexure P-7). The petittoner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India without waiting for reasonable time. 2.1t is strange that the petitioner wrthout establishing any right or breach thereof and without waiting for the decision of the Revenue, Secretary, after giving reasonable time, has approached this Court, on the ground that there is infringement of the provisions of Article 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India. l am unable to understand as to how his Fundamental Right enshrined in Articte 14 and 15 have been violated. His application is still under consideration before the Revenue Authority. 3. There is no merit in the caseand the petition lacks material facts. Thus this petition is dismissedsummarily. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge