IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27799 of 2010 SUJIT KUMAR SINGH @ SUJIT SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 13.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Gopesh Kumar, learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is land dispute in between the parties. It is not only out and out criminal litigation rather real remedy exists in civil side if there is some misdeed. Scribe of the same namely, Rabish Kumar is allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 19071 of 2009. Admittedly, he was not direct beneficiary, while petitioner is direct beneficiary as Sudhir Singh and others whose prayer has earlier been rejected by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 21934 of 2009. Of them, Sudhir Singh approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court by filing S.L.P. No. 21748 of 2009 which was turned down. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)