IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.24642 of 2011 Sidhnath Ram @ Shreenath Ram @ Satya Narayan Ram son of Sri Munni Lal Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 387, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, sections 25(1-B) A, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act and section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. The petitioner was caught with arms and he disclosed that he had gathered to collect levy for his Maoist Organization and money receipts were found in his possession. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, considering that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2011 and there has been no transaction of money, let him (Sidhnath Ram @ Shreenath Ram @ Satya Narayan Ram) be released on bail after framing of charge in the case provided his case is not bifurcated on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the F.T.C. No.1, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sessions Trial No.213 of 2011 arising out of Akorhigola P.S. Case No.05 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how 2 he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Sasaram, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)