mm hm”.1T1 zoo V Mm(W) mm 1:1200 ' mm<m) mmm 'Wm fs2‘fm wmm f2, amimm Grievance of tEe petitionc r in the instant petition is that he was working as daily wage worker in the o$ce of Divisional Fomst O$oer, Fomst Division—Kawaxdha since 1989 and he was removed mm that work on 29.2.2000. The State vide Circular dated 5‘1‘ March, 2008 (Annexure P/ 2) had dimcted tlg‘ie valious departments to consider the cases for regulalization of all the daily wage Workers, who worked continuously up to 31$ Decem ber, 1997 and they have been directed to constitute a Scruh'ny Commi ttee. However, the case of the petitioner for regularization has not been considered. Learned counsel for the pressing this petition at this die representation for redressal of his grievances before the respondent No.3, who may be further dire ted to decide the same in the light of Circular of Annexure P/ 2 W Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel yer appearing for the State submits that in case the petitioner nles a nesh representation before , respondent No.3, for redres of his grievance, the same shall be considered and decided by re pendent No.3 in accordance with law within a period of six wee s nom the date of receipt of the representation. In View of above submins of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to me a nesh representation before respondent No.3 raising all his gievances itioner further submits that he is not , however, he may be given liberty to a specified period; w t e s i ' s s.'o mmqafmw) mmw _’3/ -WW fs€tm *Wm raised in this petition. On such mpresentau‘on being made, the same shall be considsmd and decided by mspondent No.3 on its own merits in the light of Circular of Anneiiuxe P/ 2, Within a period of six week mm the date of mceipt of the representation, mmm / A