IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25406 of 2010 SUNIL KUMAR @ CHHUNU S/O RAJ KUMAR PRASAD JAISWAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 304 B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the present complaint was filed 2 ½ months after the occurrence and in fact there was statement of the deceased recorded by the police when she was removed to the hospital wherein she had stated that accidentally she caught fire and therefore it would not be under Section 304-B I.P.C. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. case no. 301/2007, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close - 2 - relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )