IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 372 OF 2009 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 372 OF 2009 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 372 OF 2009 IN IN IN EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 46 OF 2009 EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 46 OF 2009 EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 46 OF 2009 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 3279 OF 1987 SUIT NO. 3279 OF 1987 SUIT NO. 3279 OF 1987 Anant Narayan Kajrolkar ..Plaintiff versus Mrs. Neeta M. Kajrolkar & Ors. ..Defendants Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/b. M/s. Madekar & Co. for Plaintiff. Mr. Sachin V. Masurkar with Mr. S. B. Gore for Defendant Nos. 1(b) and 1(c). CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2009 DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2009 DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. At the hearing of the chamber summons, parties are present before the court. The learned counsel have tendered Consent Minutes of the Order signed by the parties. The signatures of the parties have been identified by their Advocates. The Consent Minutes of Order are taken on record and marked as ’X’ for identification. The chamber summons shall stand disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes of the Order. (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)