IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1791 of 2010(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- USHA G.NAIR, W/O.VIJAYANATHA KURUP, AGED 48, KADAMBATTU VEEDU, MULLIKULANGARA MURI, THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, PONAKAM, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SRI.N.AJITH SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.1791/2010-Y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner herein sought for appointment as ARD No.230 by submitting application before the third respondent. This was in Ward No.18 of Thekkekara Village. Finally, respondent No.5 was appointed as licencee of ARD 230 by Ext.P8. Against Ext.P8 order, the petitioner filed a statutory appeal as per Ext.P9. Petitioner had earlier submitted an application as per Ext.P6 to rectify the mistake in opting the building. That was dismissed as per Ext.P10. This was challenged by the petitioner in a revision before the Commissioner of Civil Supplies which stands rejected as per Ext.P11. Ext.P14 is the order passed by the second respondent dismissing the further revision. This was challenged again before the first respondent and the first respondent rejected the same as per Ext.P16. 2. The remedy of the petitioner is to file a revision petition before the Government. Petitioner has filed a revision petition as per Ext.P17 along with a delay petition, Ext.P18 before the Government. 3. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Ext.P17 along with Ext.P18, after W.P.(C). No.1791/2010 -:2:- hearing the petitioner and the fifth respondent within a period of five months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms