1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1937/2009 (Kundlik Kailas Gaikwad Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.S.Bayas, Adv., for the applicant. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP for the respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 11/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Counsel extensively. 2. The accused/applicant herein is an Engineer working in Block Development Office, at Osmanabad and it was part of his duty to issue demand letter to the Tehsildar which, indeed, he has issued. My attention is drawn to a copy of letter at page 29 and identical copy of letter at page 31. There is apparent interpolation and erasure in the letter at page 31, even the date 2 is changed. The contention of the Counsel that it could not have been done by him and it was done at Tehsil level, prima facie, appears to be correct. Nothing is to be recovered from the applicant. If there is any violation of terms or his duties or obligation, the Department is at liberty to initiate departmental proceedings for dereliction in his duty. However, for the present custodial interrogation of the accused/applicant is not desired. 3. (a) In the event of arrest, the accused applicant Kundlik Kailas Gaikwad be released in Crime No.43/2009, registered at Tuljapur Police Station, on his furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/-. (b) The accused applicant shall visit the investigator on every Sunday between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. for six months. 3 Application allowed accordingly. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/1937-09crapl