IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1969 of 1985 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.2.2011 Dharam Veer Singh ...Appellant Versus Daya Nand and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: None for the parties *** Ram Chand Gupta, J.(Oral) Brief facts leading to the instant Regular Second Appeal are as under:- The suit for possession by pre-emption was filed by present appellant-plaintiff, which was dismissed by learned trial court vide judgment and decree dated 29.9.1984. Against the said judgment and decree, appeal was filed by present appellant-plaintiff, which was also dismissed by learned first appellate court. Aggrieved against the same, the present appeal has been filed, which was admitted by this Court vide order dated 1.8.1985. Mr.CB Goel, Advocate appeared for the appellant when the instant appeal was admitted. When the appeal was listed for hearing, Mr.CB Goel, Advocate was called and however, he made a statement that he is no more counsel for the appellant in this case as he had taken his brief from him. RSA No.1969 of 1985 (O&M) -2- Nobody else appeared for the appellant. Hence, it seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing this appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed in default. February 9, 2011 (RAM CHAND GUPTA) gsv JUDGE