IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-35275 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.8.2011 Simarjit Kaur & another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). Learned State counsel points out that this petition was preferred by the petitioners at the stage when investigation was in progress. According to him, thereafter challan was presented before the competent court of jurisdiction and proceedings are going on. None is present on behalf of the petitioners even on second call. It appears that petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing this petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 30.8.2011 'rajpal'