IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 18681 of 2007. Date of Decision : 25.11.2008. M/S. R.S.Enterprises Petitioner. VERSUS State of Haryana and others. Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH. --- Present:- Mr.Rajnees Narula, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Palika Monga, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 4. Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent No.3. --- 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? M.M.KUMAR,J. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a direction for quashing public notice (Annexure P-9) issued by respondent No. 2 i.e. Haryana Urban Development Authority for inviting applications from the dyeing unit who were earlier transacting their business from residential/ non confirming area. The respondents has carried a survey of all the C.W.P.No. 18681 of 2007. existing unit in the area in 2002. In the survey list, the name of M/S. R.S.Enterprises, Jattal Road, Panipat through Ajay Sharma was included but the name of M/S. R.S.Enterprises , Babail Road, Panipat through Ranbir Saini was not included, which shows that unit of the petitioner was not existing unit. Therefore, this name has not been included in the list of dyeing unit entitled to be rehabilitated. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE 25.11.2008 ( JORA SINGH) Anoop JUDGE