IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.17949 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : OCTOBER 06, 2010 BALWINDERPAL ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. RD Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 27.9.2010 (Annexure P-11) qua the petitioner, who has been shown at Serial No.128, and has been transferred in execution of rationalization policy. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner withdraws the petition in challenge to order (Annexure P-11), however, contends that the respondents were required to consider the medical condition of the petitioner. The petitioner has been a chronic patient and has been operated upon a number of times. Even the employer is required to have humanitarian approach in such matters. Civil Writ Petition No.17949 of 2010 2 3. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Director General, School Education cum Special Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of School Education, Chandigarh (respondent No.2), with complete medical record and plead for a station convenient to the petitioner so that the petitioner can serve the respondents more effectively. 4. On receipt of the representation, respondent No.2 would consider the same taking into account the medical condition of the petitioner and issue appropriate orders within three weeks of receipt of the representation. 5. Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Reader. October 06, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?