CWP No.1747/08 22.9.2008 Present: Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner admits that no appointment letter was ever issued to him, inspite of the same it has been alleged that he has worked for about 7 days with the oral permission of opposite party No.3 and after 7 days the petitioner’s services were orally terminated. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner has ever signed any register or what work he has carried out during this period. The petitioner has admitted her husband’s salary before the Divisional Commissioner. The salary being on the higher side, disqualifies the petitioner to the appointment. We do not see any reason to interfere with the orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner and Divisional Commissioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Jagdish Bhalla), CJ ( Kuldip Singh) J. September 22, 2008 (sks)