4»‘' 3mg e aemh‘ (D IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT PETITIONERS f5 f \4 BILASPUR (C .6.) <§L®V /2o11 / :1 DevnaTh Dubey, aged abouT 58 year's, 5/0 Shri Ramakam‘ Dubey, Head MasTer', Governmen’r Primary School, Bir‘pur‘, Block Sumjpur‘, DisTT. Sar‘guja (C.G.) ¥x 'A £2 .. Najur‘iyus Khalkho, aged abou‘r 59 ‘years, S/o Shri Francis Khalkho, Head MasTer, Governmem‘ Middle School Bardhodi, Ambikopur, Disf’r. Sarguja (C.G.) Shanker' Pr‘ajapa’ri, aged abou’r 54 year's, S/o Shri Sukhan Ram rPr‘a-japafi, Upper Division Teacher, Governmen’r Primary School Bardodhi, Ambikapur DisTT. Sar‘guja (C.G.) Sm‘r. DayawaTi Toppo, aged abouf 53 years, W/o Shri Am‘ony Toppo, Head MasTer Gov’ernmenf Primary School Kunkurikala, Ambikapur Dish”. Sargaja (C.G.) Ramnafh Rajwade, aged aboui‘ 58 years, S/o Shri Mular Ram, Head Mas’rer, Ramanujnagar, Tahsil & Block Surajpur Digi’r. Sarguja (C.G.) W.P. (S) NO. . VERSUS / RESPONDENTS : 1. Sfa’re of ChhaTTisgarh Through Secrefur‘y, School Educa’rion Departmen‘r D‘K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C31) 2’ Dir'eCTor' Public Instructions Raipur‘ (C.G.) 3. K DisTr‘icT EducaTion Officer , 5ar‘guja , Disf’r. Sar'guja (C.G.) . / JoinT Direc‘ror', Treasury, accoum‘s, pension, Ambikapur Dish‘. Sarguja (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 4 mwP@>m3?&l;,;L 200 WWW WW WW B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra M hriVastava 3 oh S J. 23 -06 -2011 Shri Rahui Mishra, counself r the petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Ad ocate General for the $tate. w ‘ With the consent of learned o'unsel for the parties; the matter is heard k5 nnaiiy. The petitioners were appo nted on a fixed pay of Rs.150l-. After sticcessfuiiy completing the proba on period of 2 years, they were granted regular pay scaie. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue invoived in the case is as to whet er, the petitioners are entitied to reguiar pay scale with ehect from the date f initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved herein State Administrative Tribunal, Jaba pur in O.A.i\io.2745i8§ (Madhukant Yadu and 56' others v. State of MP. & others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are ent led to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. he matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in special Leave P tition (Civil) No.6892l93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon’ble Su. reme Court, upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Te chersiAssistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of i itial appointment. Learned counsel appearing ‘or the petitioners further submits that this r“ Court, while considering the same issue in Amer Sai Ram & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others [W.P.(S) 'o.47‘25/2006} by order dated 01/09r2006, allowed the petitioners to make a epresentation within a period of ten days, u XI-HC 78 mm . w .gékw- 3mm H 200