IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5259 of 2010 Sunil Kumar Mishra Versus State Of Bihar Thru Vigilance ---------------------------------- 10. 07.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Vigilance Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, vehemently opposes the prayer of bail. Irregularity rather illegalities have been shown committed in evaluation of copies of Diploma Pharmacy Candidates, one P.N. Singh was entrusted for the job. Petitioner is said one of the persons who really marked answers. Petitioner is denying evaluation of any of the copies referring no material that his handwriting or signature (initial) is available on any of the copies. P. N. Singh has been refused bail by a Bench of this court mainly liable for the guilt. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, 2 the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Vigilance-Ist, Patna in connection with Vigilance P. S. Case No.49 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)