C9 sangia mmL/Q 1N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION N043 80/2004 PETITIONER :/ Chandra Bhushan Sinha, S/o Shri / Bihari Lal Sinha, aged about 60 years, Retired P.T.1. Teacher, R/o Darawesh Shekh Hussain Baba, Chilla Sharif, Nagri PO/AT. - Nagri, District Dhamtari.(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS '1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary \M 6‘“ $h General Administration “ Wk Department , I Mantralaya,DK.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State o Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary General dministration Department , Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, (MB) 3, Union of India, Through the Secretary, The Department of Personl & Training , 3‘d floor, Loknayak Bhawan , Khan Market, New Delhi . The Director, The Directorate of Public Education Raipur (C.G.) 5. The District Education Officer, District Raipur (C.G.). 6, The Joint Director, Treasury, Account, Pension, (.) Raipur Division, Raipur. C.G lmA/ A f /’ A ne ;;;»‘c“x,.au,“w u ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ORDERS. Lm I‘’ fMf The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury Raipur, (CG) 8. The Principal, Govt. H. S. School Parastarai (Dharsiwa) District Raipur (C.G.) CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS: PROHIBTION, CERTIORARI. AND ANY OTHER WRITS. DIRECTIONS OR /h HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No, 4980 of 2004 Petitioner Chandra Bhushan Sinha Velsus Raspondents State of Chhattisgarh 8r. others. Shri N.K. Vyas, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents No. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. None for the respondents No. 2 and 3. W ( 2nd May, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Apihotti, J. 1. Leamed counsel for the peh‘tioner submits that the petitioner has flled Original Application, being O‘A. No. 273/2000 befote the Madhya Pradesh State Adminisirative Tribunal, Bench at Raipur for the same Ieh'ef, which he has sought for 1'11 this petih'on. 2. On dissolution of the State of the State Administrative Tribunal, the said O.A. No. No. 273] 2000 has been transfened to this Court. In View of the facts of the case. the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition, to which leatned counsel for the respondents has no objectioh: 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as Withdrawn. The O. A. number be mg'stered‘ and place before the Court for orders. No order as to costs. "Ri‘rn ~ \ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihoui Judge