wm Petiam Nigg 2003 u ,f ‘ GraitmzyaKtmnrDewm ged about40yem, Ink: Gmni ke S/o Qm'nrDewan, WngEtg m'ln‘asSuhneerin Wata‘aonmesDeparmut W RIO C/o Pr Dayal Wan. MLG - 3/26, Nyas Cdmy, Egaw/ “/2. St&eutMa&lyaPmiesh, 'Ir‘tmlghitsSmtary Wm n Dapar'mmb VallabhBhawan. Bhopal (MR). CONsTI’IU'rION OF INDIA FOR Issumca A wm'r I THE NATuRE OF MANDAMUS PRoHmmON CER’HORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION QR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MA’I’TER- Details ‘i the pemim PARTICULAR OF'l‘HE PEI'lTlONER: ‘ PEIITIONW / A ’ R, W ablm i N (the W) XI—HC—22 @ 3'3W, m7W Wm f? Ea, Wan $3!31; mwmw Wm§wm §gmm ‘ 25.9.2995 Shri \!.K.Pandey, coumel ior the petitianer. of Shri Bhishma Kiwger, counsel for respondent No.1lUni0n lndia. None for respondent N412 Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Government Advocate far the State! respondent No.3. LANQ, 89?0I2005 This is an application for withdrawai of the petitien. infructuoue. The lt ie stated that the petition tree become appiication ie eupportec! with an affidavit. for Union of This application is not opposed by learned oounsel lndiai’responclent No.1 as well as learned counsel for the State! respondent No.3. I The application is allowed, ln the facts and circumstances the petition is dismissed as "/ " withdrawn. Sd/— Kumar Sinha Sunil Judge awn