CR No. 4429 of 2009 Sant Lal and others vs. Sri Krishan and others Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Learned counsel states that the petitioners are the only objectors whose evidence has not been conducted. States that it is only due to the fact there were so many objectors that the petitioners got confused and were not present on 3.1.2009 when the case was fixed for their evidence. Prays that the petitioners seek only one opportunity on which they will conclude their entire evidence. In my opinion keeping in view the fact that the dispute involves partition of the abadi deh of the entire village it would be in the interest of justice to grant this one opportunity to the petitioners. Consequently the order dated 3.1.2009 closing the evidence of the petitioners and the order dated 23.7.2009 refusing recall are set aside. The trial court is directed to give one effective opportunity to the petitioners on their own responsibility to produce their entire evidence. However, for having caused this delay the petitioners are burdened with Rs.2500/- as costs. Revision stands disposed of accordingly. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 07, 2009 sunita