IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41342 of 2009 SRI NIWASH PANDEY SON OF BHAGYA NARAYAN PANDEY RESIDENTOF PANDEY TOLA, P.S.- MALAHI DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06/01/2010 Heard Mr. Shakeel Ahmad the learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 3.7.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10851 of 2008 with liberty that he may renew his prayer for bail before the court below if the informant does not support the prosecution case. Submission is that the informant has been examined now and he has stated that one Bhagya Narayan Pandey is responsible for the offence. The informant has supported the prosecution case in course of his evidence. The trial is progressing well. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)