IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TI5GARH AT BILASPUR (g) WRIT PETITION NoSggé /2005 The Zila Panchayat Bilasipur Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur (C.G.). / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITLJ.‘ ION £'l[?,,INDIA, 1950 .FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATLJJI'H: I‘ ,CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIAT I ‘ _O_RDER[ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. . _‘ I ‘I g l‘-’[EE"I‘]1TIONER / Ramadhar Yadav Son of EEHH Saphedulal Yadav, aged: about w 28 years, Shiksha Karmi Gradc» 3, Balak Ashram Beljheriya, Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilallpul (C.G-) VERSUS /1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secrf‘h-u v 5r m 9V bepartment of ‘ krH-ETH‘, Mantralaya, D.KLS. Bhawun Raipur (C.G.). Janpad Panchayat MarwHl'Il Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Marwahi, District Biiaspur (C.G.). ,(3. The Additionai Collector, Pundm Road, District Bilaspur (CIGL) /4. The District Education Ofl’icor, Education District Bilaspur (C.G.). M WRIT PETITION N0. 5386 of 2005 RamadharY’adav Versus es ndent Stata-of Chhattisgam & others WRIT PETiTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226%7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) prmnn 5hr: Aamyavkumar, Advocate with smi PP. séhu, Shri MRS. Bhatia, Deputy Govgmment Advocate=forthe Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ ‘ State. ,..._. - 0%E3 (ORAL) (Passed on 7 Day oMpn'l; zinc} Learned counsel appearing forthe peitionar submits that the relief sought for in this petitioner has already been granted by the respondents and as'such nothing surviws fw adjudication and this petition has bécome infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not controvert the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become - Infructuous. e W I ‘ Satish K. Agnihom 3 Judge Arun fess « sit/—