IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8871 of 2005 1. RAMJI RAI 2. Laxman Rai 3. Bharat Rai 4. Saraswati Devi 5. Sita Devi 6. Reshma Devi, all heirs of the petitioner Began Rai ( dead) , Son of Late Mukhi Lall Ray, resident of Village- Chaubeji Ke Chhavni, P.O. Sonpa, P.S. Rajpur, District-Buxar ------ Petitioners Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan,Patna ( Hereinafter referred to as Electricity Board). 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan,Patna 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna 4. The General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Central Bihar Area, Electricity Board,Patna 5. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Central Bihar Area Electricity Board,Patna 6. The Electrical Superintendent Engineer, Electrical Circle, Bihar State Electricity Boar, Arrah 7. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division,Buxar ------------ Respondents. ----------- 05 20-01-2011 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar State Electricity Board. In this case by filing counter affidavit, it has been admitted that all the admissible dues of the petitioner have already been paid. However, learned counsel for the petitioners disputes and submits that interest was not paid to the petitioner. The Court is of the opinion that the for the purpose of interest it would not be appropriate to keep the matter further pending. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 2 However, liberty is granted to the petitioners that if he has got any grievance regarding interest, he may file a representation before the Respondent no.3 .If such representation is filed, it is expected that Respondent no.3 will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. It is made clear that if Respondent no.3 feels that demand of the petitioners is genuine, he will take appropriate steps for making payment of the same. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)