[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2347 OF 2008 Shri.Bharat Pandurang Jadhav ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Ujwal R.Agandsurve Advocate for Applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.181 of 2008 of Sadar Bazar Police Station, Solapur. The said case is mainly under Sections 420 and 392 of IPC. 3. The complainant has stated that he was told that he could get gold at a rate which was Rs.500/- cheaper per tola than the market value. The complainant has stated that the present applicant took 1.5 lakh from him in order to get him gold at [-2-] a cheaper rate. After taking Rs.1.5 lakh from the complainant, the applicant disappeared and he did not give any gold to the complainant. The material on record clearly implicates the applicant. It appears that many persons are involved in this racket, the custody of the applicant would be necessary to find out nature and extent of the racket and to find out who else is involved in the said case, hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. 4. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]