THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.2635 OF 2008 Dated 8th July, 2010 Between: …petitioner And …respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO C.R.P.No.2635 OF 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, though served, none appeared for the respondent herein. The petitioner who is the defendant herein filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order rejecting an application purported to have filed under Order 16 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking for issuance of summons to certain witnesses. The Court below did not find favour with and dismissed the same, hence the revision. Having heard the counsel and on perusal of the material, it is quite apparent that the present application has been filed in the year 2006 where as the Court below by taking into account the subsequent events i.e., subsequent to filing of the suit did not find it appropriate to show any indulgence and dismissed the same. It also is seen that absolutely there is no reason forthcoming as to why the application has not been taken up after it is filed. Certainly, subsequent events or further steps which have been taken up in the course of trial would not come against the petitioner for seeking the relief as sought for nor would it go against him. In view of the above, the revision is allowed setting aside the orders passed in I.A.No.353 of 2006 in O.S.No.149 of 1999 and the same stands allowed. No costs. ________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO,J) Date:8th July, 2010 grk