IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33608 of 2010 MONU PANDIT @ GAURAV KAUSHIK, S/o Kishore Kaushik. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is named in the confessional statement of the co-accused but for some reason or the other he was apprehended much later while the trial of both the cases proceeded, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge and in case it is done the petitioner’s prayer for bail shall not be considered. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)