2.- \ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W-P d. W.PeNO. ;2^ \2007fS.B.I ( Petition under article 227 Constitution Ofladia) PETITIONER Defendantno.l RESPONDENTs ^> /^^F^ ^y' <^y RAM JATAN S\o GARAJU CASTE PJ^JWAR aged about 45 years , Occupation: Cultivator, R\o Village Dumariya, P.S. Patana Tahasil Baikunthpur Distt. Korea ( C.G.) VERSUS 1. ASHOK KUMAR S\o PURAN RAM; CASTE RAJWAR Aged 10 yrs.; Minor 2. NILESHKUMARS\oPURANRAMCASTE RAJWAR Aged 10 yrs.; MinorBoth Through Natural Gaurdian Father Puran Ram Rajwade S\o Late Shri Lolar Sai Rajwar; Aged 36 yrs., Occupation: Cultivator, ( Next Friend); R\o Village Dumariya, P.S. Patana Tahasil Baikunthpur Distt. Korea ( C.G.) BIGAN RAM S\o SHRI RASAD RAJWAR Caste rajwar aged about 40years , Occupation: jCultivator, R\o Village Dumariya, P.S. Patana Tahasil Baikunthpur Distt. Korea ( C.G.) 4. State ofChhattisgarh Through Collector; 'a, Korea- Baikunthpur ( C.G.) r«/rPETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3. sn^i w R-<i+ wn3niw9?tiw i-w -^^ ^^ '<ii<<i<n<i, e'Tily'Ko, f»<fliy^< :.^ - 6§2£/©7^ * 3TI^T'<PRi' ('yf^S?) ^mw :Hfta sii^ii S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prash 23-9-2010 No one appears for the pefftioner Ms. Sangeeta Mishr^, State/respondent No.4. When the matter was c^illed Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate infor|ned The matter was passed ojver behalf of the petitioner, however| appeared to press the writ petitio^ In the event, there is no ottfer dismiss the writ petition for want The writ petition is dismiss^d 'tiwit.'i'fl-f ^R?ff'" fstzt <r»i«;i< ^?3ifTO31lt?[ nt Kumar IVIishra Panel Lawyer for the on in the first round, Shri that he has no instructions. to wait for representation on even in the second call, no one option left with the Court but to f prosecution. for want of prosecution. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^/