IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.374 of 2008 NUNESHWAR TANTI S/O LATE LEKHA TANTI, R/O VILL-BELA, P.S. SABAUR, DIST. JAMUI --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NARAYAN TANTI 3. GENO TANTI BOTH SONS OF LATE HULAS TANTI 4. BIND TANTI 5. SANJAY TANTI, BOTH SONS OF BALI TANTI. 6. MITHILESH TANTI, S/O RADHE TANTI, ALL R/O VILL-BELA P.S. KHAIRA, DIST. JAMUI. --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 03 30.08.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner is the maker of the F.I.R. which gave rise to Sessions trial no. 967 of 2004 of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no. 4 Jamui, raises a grievance with respect to the judgment and order of acquittal dated 26.02.2008. I have gone through the reasonings assigned by learned Court below as culled out in paragraph nos. 8 and 9. In my view, the judgment and order of acquittal cannot be said to be perverse. There is no merit in application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)