IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 615 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sajid @ Bhura .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 73/2010, U/s 392, 411 IPC, PS Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. ___________________________________________________________________ June 30, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Virendra Kaparwan, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and the looted tractor was recovered from the possession of the co-accused in the presence of the applicant as well as the complainant. But the complainant could not identify the present applicant on the spot when the tractor was recovered. He further submitted that applicant has got no previous criminal history, who is in jail since 25.3.2010 and the trial is yet to begin. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR, recovery memo and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Sajid @ Bhura be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 30.6.2010 PRABODH