WP(C) 6027/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR B.K. SHARMA The petitioner is aggrieved by the Annexure-6 order dated 21.6.2007 that had been passed in terms of the order dated 6.6.2006 passed by this Court in WP (C) No. 3950/1999. In the writ petition, the petitioner had prayed for a directi on to the respondents to release balance quantity of gold ornaments weighing 320 .065 gms seized by the respondents i.e. the Customs Officials vide case No. 1/Go ld/OC/Cust/HQrs.Priv/SH/86 and also for quashing of the said proceeding. During the course of hearing of the said writ petition, the learned coun sel for the petitioner confined his arguments only to the first prayer i.e. rele ase of the gold weighing 320.065 gms. The writ petition was virtually dismissed with the following observations :- Although no relief can be granted to the petitioner, it is hereby provided that the respondent No.2 shall pass appropriate order in terms of the aforesaid orde r dated 8.12.1995 in RA No. 1/1993, taking into account the Annexure-4 represent ation dated 10.2.1996, if the same has not already been disposed of. The writ petition is dismissed subjected to the above observations. Pursuant to the aforesaid observation, the Commissioner of Customs (Prev entive), NER, Shillong has passed the impugned order dated 21.6.07. By the said order, the Commissioner has dealt with each and every aspect of the matter in de tail. It has been held that the entire quantity of gold seized / confiscated fro m the petitioner from the petitioner, was released to him. Consequently, it has been held that there is no merit in the application filed by the petitioner. The Writ Court exercising its power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Con stitution of India, cannot make any roving enquiry in respect of the disputed fa ct as narrated in the order dated 21.6.2007. On perusal of the said order, what I find is that the matter has been discussed in detail. Moreover, in view of the earlier order of this Court, referred to above, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. Ms. R. Bora, learned CGC is present.