r Kesponde WHATTIS6. U P Wt W * r •i^5 isn v.. Smt. Niti Kumwi, W/o Shri Jeevan Lol Halba, Aged dwut 22 years, At pr'esent working os on Angnnwadi Sahayaka, 6rom Panchcycrt-Chandrivan Tahsii - Dondi Luhara, i>istrict-&urg. R/o ViJlege- Chandrivan, Tohsil-t>ondi Luhsra, &tetr!ct-&urq, Chhattisqarh. Versus Tare sgarn, Thmugh The Secretary, Panchayat and ilfare Oeparfment, &.K.S. Bh< iaipur, (C.ff.) 2. Tne CoEiector, bur'g, District-burg, 3. E>i5tpict Project Officer', Mdiita BcS Vikas, Pr-oject-bondi Lohara, bistrict- r G. i-.Cf, 4. The Chief Executive officsr, Jonpat Pcnchayat, &ondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.6.) 5. Sorpanch, ©I'an-iPanchayat, Chondriiwim. Tahsil-Dondi &!3trict-&urg, C.6. 6. Smt. Deepika Bai, W/o Shri Naresh Kumor, R/o Viilage-Ckandrivan Nayagaon, T<ihsil-&ondi Lohara, E>istrict-&urg, C.&. . Vishnu K. ii TOP i-he tseti'tioner. AAs. Oeepdi Pandey, Panel Lod'yer for fhe 5tate/ respondent No. 1, 2 ORbEft :*h Passed on 16'" &ay of March, 2007) Learned counsel appecring for the petitjoner submits that the Janpa mcn<vaT, Lohura, Distr-ict &ur'g on the of complaints mquired into the recrultment of Anganbadf Karyakarta/Sahtyaka, the ¥- Panchcyat, on the basis of said inquiry, new iist has been pubiiAed, wherein the petitioner did not found her name. The petitioner was initialSy appointed vide order dated 21-8-2CX)6 (Annsxwe P-6). After' a period of five months, this exercise has been don®.Since, the or'der* is punitive in nature which civi! consequences, the petitfoner has dready worked for five months and the order is prejudicia! and affects coreer of the petitioner. Lea"ned counsel further submits that no notice was given to any persons, including the petstioner, who duly appointed as Sahayaka. that as it mcy, since the petltioner has ifforked for a period of five months after due selectfon, it i3 deslr'abte in the jnterest of justice that my order is punitive in nature, against the petitioner wouU have been appr-aised ty^ the propsr opporS-ynity of hearing. ,4ccording!y, the Coliector', Durg te directed to offord an opport'unity of hearing to the petitioner and consi'der her case crtd appropriate ordsr in accordancs with Anganbadi Scheme and !a», within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of o copy of fhis ordep, The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Consequentty, I./,. No. 1, an application for stay of operation ond effeet of »eimpugned order dated 8.1.2007, of. Sd/- ^., Satisti KAgnihotri ,, Judge .; , 5ubhcsh