1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3012 OF 2007 [Samarath Raosaheb Baba Public Library and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri. R.J.Godbole,Advocate for Petitioners. Shri.R.P.Phatke,A.G.P.for Respondents. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 29TH JUNE, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners received telephonic instructions from the petitioners that out of 12 petitioners, 11 petitioners got Government sanction as “Public Libraries” under the Government Scheme as reflected from the Government Resolution 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders annexed with the petition. 3. According to the petitioners, in the case of petitioner No.5 the Government did not take the decision. The learned A.G.P. received certain papers and instructions. On the instructions, Mr. Phatke, learned A.G.P. submits that the Government has not taken decision in respect of petitioner No.5, as there was another applicant in competition with petitioner No.5, who secured more marks and whose case was found more meritorious than the petitioner No.5. Therefore, the Government has not sanctioned the proposal of petitioner No.5. 4. The present Writ Petition is pending since the year 2007. In the light of Government Resolution and statement made by the learned A.G.P. we dispose of the 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Writ Petition. In case the petitioners have some grievance, they may resort to appropriate remedy as permissible in law. 5. The petitioners are directed to pay individual Court Fees. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK