AB 775/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Shri B K Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Als o heard Shri B S Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of As sam. I have also heard Shri PKR Choudhury, learned counsel for the informant, ob jecting the bail prayer. Also perused the Case Diary. This application U/S 438 CrPC has been filed by the petitioner N os. 1 and 2, namely, Sri Ranjit Kumar Deb and Smt Jolly Deb, respectively, prayi ng for anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Paltanbaza r PS Case No. 84 of 2011 under Sections 406/ 420/ 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Co de. The FIR has been lodged by one Smt Sarmistha Deb, alleging that after the death of her husband one Maruti Omni Vehicle bearing registration No. AS-01-AA-5768, had been fraudulently transferred in the name of her mother-in-la w. Sri Roy Choudhury, learned counsel for the informant, also produ ced 2 (two) affidavits executed by the mother-in-law and other in-laws of the in formant. Those affidavits were submitted in the Office of the DTO, Kamrup, givin g no objection for transfer of the vehicle in the name of their mother. In both the affidavits, the accused persons did not say anything that the wife of the re gistered owner of the vehicle was still alive. In this way, there appears to be a strong case of transferring t he vehicle in a clandestine manner in collusion with the DTO staff. Hence, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to th e petitioners. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands rejected.