HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR PETITIONER Mahk Ram Thakur son of Kaztik Dhamald, Blo Kawardha, District W.P.1S[ No. 6925 of 20.06 Kabirdham (C,G.) Versus 1 State ofChhattisgarh, Throgh- 2 Distm'ct Education Kabirdham C. G.) 3 Block Education O$ce13 Kawardha, > District Kairdham (C.G.) the Constitution of India Shn' Deepak ain, counsel for the petitioner. co. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, anel Lawyer, for the ‘ State on advance py P ‘ ORAL oRnER (24.08.2007) “ SUNIL KUMAR SINHA Heard on amission. order passed 1'11 the case o Dam Yashwant and another Kumar Bharadyg {2006 @ MPJR-CG Vs. Municigal 96g. He Comorationz submits that ioner’s such qualification. c — RESPONDENTS u ( Writ Petition under Article 26 of b Aggearance: J - NJ d f 't 2 W‘P.!S) No. 6925 of2006 Accordingly, this wn't petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwam‘ Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Carporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the peti 'oner had acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. The petition stands iinally disposed of. No order as to, costs. a Sunil Kumar Sinha I’Ir—i Sdl- Judge vatti