1 can94.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.4 OF 1992 Mr.N.D.Patil ...Applicant vs. Jivan Ganpat Gavad & Ors. ...Respondents Ms Sunanda Kumbhat for the applicant Mr.K.N.Kore for the respondent no.1 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE :DECEMBER 23,2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant who is the contemnor no.18. The prayer is for cancellation of bailable warrant issued by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner in the contempt petition opposes the prayer on the ground that the applicant has repeatedly remained absent. 2 The object of issuing warrant was to secure presence of the applicant before this Court. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant undertakes to this Court to remain personally present in this Court on the dates on which contempt petition will appear on board. Undertaking is accepted subject to condition that the applicant will file a separate undertaking in writing during the course of the day. 3 In view of the undertaking, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). It is made clear that the warrant issued as against the applicant is set 2 can94.sxw aside. However, the warrant issued as against the contemnor no.1 shall be executed in terms of the earlier order. Application is disposed of. JUDGE