IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 3679 of 2008 Date of Decision: 29.7.2009 Gurdial Singh ....Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Sharma, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Mahabir Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The plaintiff-petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India feeling aggrieved against the order dated 23.5.2008 passed by the District Judge, Sirsa, affirming that of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa dated 20.8.2007 whereby the application filed by him under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for injunction was dismissed. The lower appellate court while affirming the order of the trial court declining the prayer of the plaintiff has recorded that the jamabandi for the year 1966-67 shows some land owned by him along with his brothers but the facts as to what is his exact share in the Shamlat land and whether he is in actual possession of the land in suit C.R. No. 3679 of 2008 -2- have not been proved on record. No illegality or perversity could be pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the orders passed by the courts below warranting interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, there is no merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to make sincere efforts for expeditious disposal of the suit. Nothing observed in this order shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. July 29, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE