IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52167 of 2008 Ranjan Prasad, Son of Gauri Shankar Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Thatheri Bazar, dumraon, Ward No. 24, P.S- Dumraon, Dist- Buxar. Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- For the petitioner- Mr. Prabhakar Tiwary Mr. sushil Kumar Singh For the State--- Mr. Jharkhandi 05 16.11.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Addl. P.P. appearing for O.P. No.1, State. The petitioner has approached this court to quash the order dated 24.5.08 passed in Criminal Revision No. 193 of 2007 by the court of Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C III, Buxar allowing the aforesaid criminal revision preferred by the 2nd party/ O.P. No. 2 Ajay Kumar against the order dated 22.8.07 passed in proceeding under Section 133 Cr.P.C. by the S.D.M Dumraon directing the second party/ OP. No. 2 Ajay Kumar to remove the Mill/Haller from the land in dispute. It appears that on the basis of application of first party/ petitioner Ranjan Prasad proceeding under Section 133 Cr. P.C. was initiated against the second party/ OP. No. 2 Ajay Kumar under which on 22.7.07 the order was passed directing the second party/O.P. No.2 to remove the mill/ 2 Haller to plot No. 137 of Khata No. 136 of village Thatheri Bazar. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid order the second party-O.P. No.2 Ajay Kumar preferred the Criminal Revision No. 193 of 2007 which was allowed by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Buxar with finding that mandatory provisions of sections 137 and 138 Cr.P.C. have not been complied because evidence of Ist party/ 2nd Party have not been recorded. I find no illegality in the impugned order for interference in inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly this application is dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)