IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA No. 454 of 2004. Decided on: 6.4.2011 Ram Singh ……….Appellant Versus Ram Dass ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant : Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties outside the Court. Consequently, the RSA is rendered infructous and same is dismissed as having become infructous, so also the pending application(s), if any. April 6, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.