IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.18667 of 2010 Between: Billu Saradamma ……PETITIONER(S) and The Station House Officer, Police Station, Yerpedu Mandal, Chittoor District and another ……RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.18667 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, the learned counsel for petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Home. At their request, the Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks to declare the action of 1st respondent in calling her to the police station and threatening her with dire consequences if she failed to vacate and handover possession of the land admeasuring Ac.1-20 cents in Sy.No.101/5 in Rajulapalem Village, Chittoor District, belonging to her to the 2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary and, consequently, to direct the 1st respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes between her and the 2nd respondent. The case of the petitioner is that she was assigned the said land by the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Yerpedu, vide DKT No.65/4/1413 dated 28.02.2004 and she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same since then. As the 2nd respondent filed O.S.No.22 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, against her seeking permanent injunction alleging that she was granted assignment to an extent of Ac.1-02 cents; she also filed O.S.No.33 of 2010 before the same Court and both the Suits are pending. While so, the 1st respondent herein at the instance of the 2nd respondent and local leaders is calling her and her husband to the police station daily and threatening them to hand over possession of the land to the 2nd respondent. Hence, the Writ Petition. Counter affidavit is filed by the 1st respondent stating that he never summoned the petitioner or her husband to the police station and asked them to vacate and hand over the land in question to the 2nd respondent at any point of time and, as the dispute between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent is purely civil in nature, he has nothing to do with the same. It is further submitted that to settle her personal scores against the 2nd respondent, the petitioner made baseless allegations against him. In view of the submissions made in the counter affidavit, no further orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. 20th October 2010 CVRK