t: g E'giFiEEi IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (T! No. éw of 2007 In the matter of Petitioner cf, :a'a/ (1) Shree Chem Resins Limited f a company incorporated under the provisions ofthe Companies Act 1956 having its works at Darramura Raigarh (C.G.) through its accountant and authorised signatory B.K. Mazumdar S/o Late Sasadhar Mazumdar aged about 52 years resident of Jute mill staff colony Post and District Raigarh (C.G.) /(2) B.K. Mazumdar S/o Late Sasadhar Mazumdar aged about 52 years resident of Jute Mill Staff Colony, Post and District Raigarh (C.G.) accountant and authorised signatory Shree Chem Resins Limited Versus gt) Commercial Tax Officer Raigarh Circle, Raigarh (C.G.) (/2) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Department of Commercial Taxes, D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner CommerCial Tax Vanijyik Kar Bhavan Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.), @ Before : Hon'ble The ChiefJustice and his com anion Jud es of the Hon'ble Hi h Court of Judicature Chhattis arh at Bilaspur. XI—HC—78 HW,WW,W Wm W‘1K'0L0‘72’0.%00.~ 'aq 200? WWHEIEWI) P.T.O. XI»HC—78 HW,WI§,W W WwJ.f.‘.gjt go 00209 ..o.. 1H 200? mam-(W) WWW WWW mawmm WW§WW éa‘mm Learned counsel for of the petitioner-industy is under consideration befoxe the State authorities which is evident from vaiiqus comJ However, the authorities are not deciding the matter and the petitioner—Industry has been fastened with the liability of payment of huge amoum of tax and the petitioner-Industry apprehends that its registration ce1 Lihcate may be cancelled for non‘payment of the above taxes and thereby, the peu'tioner may be forced to close the Industry. the petitioner submits that the case for eligibility of exemption certmcate nunications by the State authorities. 'On the other hand, that from perusal of writ etition of Annexure P/ 1 tiled by the petitioner-Industry, it wo Industxy has already challenged the order dated 23.3.2000 of the Additional Industries Commissioner, Bhopal whereby grant of exemption for a period of three years, has been refused and the same is pending. The out of the claim of exempi eamed counsel for the State submits be evident that the petitioner- right claimed by the petitioners arise ion of the petitioner-Industry, which P.T.O. XI—HC—78 HW,WW,W Wmwla£jl.2«0 an; 2009 WW<W>