BEFORE THE HON'BL£_HIGHCQURT OF CHHATTISGARH^T BILASPUR C.G. In the Matter af W.P.No—^-'-^/2003<? PETITIONER RESFOffi)ENTS ^^... /•-ric^^-" vy. &' ^l^^ .••••' imt. .Shanti Thakur, w/o. Roopna.th Thakur, aged about 40 years, Sarpanch Gram -Paj'ichayat Charama, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. V'ersus 1) State of Chhattisgarfa, through : principle Secretary, Department of Gram Panchayat Maritralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2} The CoUector, District Kanker, (C.G.) 3) Sub D^fiswn^OfE.cer, Kanker (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^227y6f THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_FOR ISSUANCE_OF_WR!'LIN_'rflE NATURE_QF_MANDAMUS, CERTIQRARI AND /QR ANY_OTHER CQMMAND_QFJ.lKEj}ATURE; XI-HC-22 TS ••^WCII, Wll'M'Ko, ItCIIW^ 3n^?r i^raT . .^^.f::s}^ll^ .„ ••^ 200 HIWIT St>»f|ch l^p' an^isRr R;-<i<ii sn^it stt*ii°ti ^f^d T^?T <Ml<;<il ^RIIW ytsa' ttfcis 28.7.2003 Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Ad\ Shri Sanjay K. Agarwal, on. behalf of fhe Respoiidents. By this petition under 'petitioner seeks to chaUenge tb^ 10.7.2003 passed m Panchaya^ leamed Conector dismissed fhe the order passed :by the S.D.0. from the post of Sarpauch. petition No. 161/2003 before the petitioner was atlowed to fhe petition. Leamed counsel fi| CoUector without foUcwins statem.eets of coiuplauiaiit MaiEJl not. appear before the Euqui4 iaterim stay be granted. On the other hand leanidd fhat fhere is a provisipn for filii| the CQllec.tor before fhe Directoil In view of the above Advocate Geneial, leamed cot] admitted that the petitioner wf CoUector but in the meanwi laaiatained. <!hl<ti<"l<il^^wvS^ fel<3 Ttf^lt^K '^3I^?3jI^T i|ocate for the petitioner. Ipeputy Advocate Geneial takes uotice Aifticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution the order passed by fhe Conector dated Appeal No. Ol/A-89/02-03, whereby ^.ppeal of the petitiouer and confirmed - f. by which the petitioner was removed" E^i-lier also the petitioner filed a writ Court aad vide orier dt. 13.3,2003 |ntiiiue ou the posf tifl ;fhe disposal of >r the petitiouer subiaits that learued te relevaut procedure recorded the |ta Saliu who in spite of fhe notices did y OfScer and the S.D.O. Therefore, a^d Deputy Advocate General submitted tg icvision. agaiast the order passed toy' Panchayat. ubmission niade by learned Deputy |insel for the petitioner very fiaiikly- U fUe a revision against.the oider of lile status quo be directed to be [Tti^fig^ XI-HC-22 aiI^f^T R'ti.'k an^i ^ii°b yfsa 1^^ ^W^'^S '3^-<<i<<l<'t<l, snal^'is, piwi'w'^ SIT^ 'q^qT , • ^ P Si ^fSSS ^i^SI^ ^f s-?' iitCTi aitiich ^ 2fl0 fe^I' Hayiae heard leamed co fo the facts and circumstanc petitiouer niay file a revisiou period of 10 days from foday, oider ou fhe stay applicatic contiaue QU ftie same pqst. '{^j <-Mji'^jc- ^"-^ii^e- Wifh fhe aboye observ, 3|unsel for fhe parties aad haviag regardi.. ;s ofttie case, it is directed tttat the I'efore fh.e Director, Panchayat within a ^nd till the Director Paachayat pass aa |n the petitioner niay be allov/ed to . ^tion fhis petition stands disposed of finally. Parties are entitled for e' ^<it<i<il^ ^lwif'4 fa^ Tf^-yK ^ <i)Fd4 an^CT ^ rtified copy ofthis order. Sd/- LC.Bhados ~ judge [1[it^^Rsi^ ? Ct Oi