1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal No. 517 of 2009 IN Writ Petition No. 3853 of 2009 [decided] [Tekchand Sudam Gaure Vs. Ramdas A. Bhorgade & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.Z. Jibhkate, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. P.N. Shende, Adv., for respondent no.1. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 19th November, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. The point emphasized is that the amendment in Clause (10) of Rule 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 alters reservation from 24% to 33%, and it results in fractional reservation. 3. According to learned Adv. Mr. Jibhkate, this aspect is not considered by the learned Single Judge, as well was not an issue in the Judgment before Full Bench. 4. We are of considered view that the 2 applicability of Full Bench judgment does not change percentage of reservation,since the totality of reservation thereby does not change. 5. Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, seen to be without merit, and is dismissed. Judge Judge |Hedau|