IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26821 of 2011 Lal Deo Yadav, son of Etwar Yadav, resident of village-Nagauli, P.S.- Bhagwanganj, District-Patna …Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar …OP ---------------------------------- 3/ 16.12.2011 Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner is being filed. Let it be kept with the record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 406, 379, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case is that truck of the informant was looted away by some unknown miscreants. Subsequently, the petitioner and Md. Mumtaz were arrested, who confessed before the police. From the possession of Md. Mumtaz two phones were recovered and one of them tallies with the looted mobile. There is no recovery of any kind from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, in connection with AthmalGola P.S. Case No.191 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be the wife of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about 2 any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next one year. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)