IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3423 of 2005 NARENDRA PRASAD Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. ----------- 03/ 06.01.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Electricity Board. The petitioner had filed the writ petition for payment of his retiral benefits having retired from the services of the Board with effect from 30.11.2004 from the post of the Accountant. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the Board on 26.5.2008 after service of the same upon the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and in paragraph- 3 thereof the detail of the admitted amount of retiral dues have been mentioned. The affidavit has filed on 26.5.2008 and there is no rejoinder controverting the submissions made therein. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)