IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30488 of 2008 MANOJ PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.11.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for opposite party no. 2. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A of the Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission is that there are no serious or heinous allegation. Even before the court below the petitioner had offered to keep the complainant with dignity when she refused to appear before the court below after one appearance leading to dismissal of his application. The offer is reiterated before this Court. Counsel for the complainant states that he has no objection to the grant of limited anticipatory bail to the petitioner to enable him to so his bona fide for revival of matrimonial harmony. In the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of four months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Patna City in Complaint Case No. 699 of 2006. If during this period of four months based on subsequent developments he physically surrenders to the jurisdiction of the Court his application for regular bail shall be considered appropriately in law without being prejudiced by the limited grant of anticipatory bail by this Court. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)