IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.1208 of 2006 Between: Smt.Sabina Sharif. … Petitioner And The Competent Authority/Additional Director General of Police, CID, A.P., Hyderabad and two others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.Rambabu for Sri C.B.Ram Mohan Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home for R.1 and R.2. None for R.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the first and second respondents in issuing the G.O.Ms.No. 82, Home (General-B) Department, dt. 23-3- 2002 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same, consequently direct the respondents not to disturb the possession or dispossess the petitioner from the property of the petitioner”. At the hearing, Sri K.Rambabu, learned counsel representing Sri C.B.Ram Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP Nos.1434 and 1435 of 2006 are also dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:03-6-2009 MNR