IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28393 of 2008 PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 29/9/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Considering the movement of the grains at the unearthly hour, at 4.00 a.m. the petitioner being named, the grains being of a Government scheme, this Court is not persuaded to grant anticipatory bail on the submission that the driver subsequently changes his statement with regard to the surname of the petitioner. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )