WSLE. DCSS< 1 (^p; 5 IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. rs). 6^^/2009 . PETITIQNER i;l ..;, i iiil...li: ili-..j-..^ '..•^- ^.^&s^ "'.-"".C^V^VF"^ RESPONDENTS V ^i / Murli Ram Thakur, Son of Banshi Lal Thakur, aged about 56 years, Occypation - Head Master, Primary School, Siyalmara, District Durg, R/o. Village and post Belouri, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District -Durg (C.G.), VERSUS ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.), ,:2, The Director, Public Instructions Department, Raipur (C.G.), ^3. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.), '4. Block Education Officer, Gunder- dehi, District - Durg (C.G.) ^5. Treasury & Funds Department, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARSOFTHE PETITIONER:- As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARSOFTHERESPONDENTS:- Turoane ^v HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.64S5 OF 2009 PETITIONER MurliRamThakur Versus RESP0NBENTS « State of ehhattisgarh and others (Writ petition under ArUcles 226 ofthe ConsfituUonof India) SingleBench: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Agmhcrtri, J. Present: - Shri D. N. Prajapati, counsel fbrthe petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 09tndayof November, 2009) Leamed counsel for the petitioner, pn instructions, seeks permission cS this Court to withdraw this petitton with liberty to make a representation before ttie respondent authorities. (2) No objection from the other side. (3) It is ordered, as prayed for. (4) Accordingly, the petifion is dismissed aswithdtawn withthe aforestated liberty. Sd/- ^atishK.AgnihoW Jiidge y$ ^K