IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30500 of 2010 RUPESH MANJHI @ RITESHWAR MANJHI, SON OF SRI LALDEO MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the statement of the alleged victim girl that she had solemnized marriage with the petitioner and, therefore, no offence under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code would be made out, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, VIII, Patna, in Session Trial No. 599 of 2010 arising out of Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 240 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court 2 below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate shall immediately commit the case to the court of Sessions and the trial court in seisin of the case will pass proper orders as to whether any offence is made out against the accused persons in view of the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)