- 1 - form rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.634 OF 2011 M/s Spark Developers .. Applicant vs Laxman Shivram Patil & ors .. Respondents Mr.S.A.Sawant for Applicant Mr.V.T.Tulpule i.b Mr.Harshad Kandalkar for Respondents Mr.K.V.Saste APP for State CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J DATE: 17 th August 2011 P.C. 1. This Application is filed by the original complainant for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent nos. 1 to 12 by the Sessions Court in MECR No.2 of 2010 registered by Dadar police station for offences under section 387 read with section 506 Part II of the Indian penal code. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. It appears that the Applicant who is the original Complainant has undertaken some development project under the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. According to him, Accused/Respondent nos.1 to 12 were repeatedly creating law and order problem and - 2 - form had gone at the site of the work in a mob armed with stones, sticks and damaged the office and another property. Several complaints were lodged by the complainant with the police but the police registered only non-cognizable cases and did not take any action. Therefore, he filed a complaint before the Magistrate in which a direction was sought to the police to investigate under section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. According to the Respondents, they are the residents of the slum area on which the Applicant is trying to make development. According to them, they have get certain rights which have been violated. They had also filed several complaints against the Applicant- complainant and the police have registered non cognizable cases. 3. It appears that while granting anticipatory bail the learned Sessions Court directed five accused persons to attend police station on every sunday till further orders. Six accused persons who are aged 60 years and above were not required to attend the police station. Learned counsel for the Applicant points out that the condition of attending the police station was not imposed on Respondent NO. - 3 - form 10 Hemant Vasant Worlikar (Nakhua) who is aged 48 years and is not a senior citizen. 4. After some discussion at the bar, the learned counsel for the Applicant states that he would be satisfied if the Respondent No.10 Hemant Vasant Worlikar (Nakhua) is also directed to attend the police station and that all the Respondents are required not to create law and order problem at the site of the work. To this, the learned counsel for the Respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, while the Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail stands rejected, the Respondent No.10 Hemant Vasant Worlikar (Nakhua) is also hereby directed to attend the Dadar police station on every Sunday between 5 to 7 p.m.,till filing of the charge sheet. All the Respondent Nos.1 to 12 are hereby directed not to create law and order problem at the site of the work. Application stands disposed of accordingly. J.H.BHATIA, J - 4 - form