IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5165 of 2010 LALAN PASWAN @ RITLAL, SON OF DEEPNARAYAN PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR, P.S. DHIBRA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD (BIHAR). Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.2.2010. Heard Mr. Md. Gyasuddin Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No.166 of 2008 for the offence under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and also 25(1-B)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act and 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act. Without going into the merit of the case, the court is not inclined to grant bail due to simple reason that in this case, the allegation against the petitioner was that he was member of extremist group and when police rushed there, firing was open to the police and in that occurrence one constable died. The petitioner is in jail since 10.12.2008 and as such it is not desirable that without trial, one should be kept behind bars. However, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for - 2 - N.H./ bail is rejected at the moment. However, if no progress takes place during the trial, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)