IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36233 of 2009 SANJAY SINGH, Son of Late Brij Bihari Singh, Resident of Village-Dihra, P.S.-Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is neither named in the First Information Report nor identified by any one and no recovery has been effected from his possession and the only material is that he has confessed his guilt in another case on account of which he was implicated in the present case, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 25.05.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) - 2 - That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been implicated repeatedly at the instance of the local police who is hostile to the petitioner so it will be in the interest of justice if he is allowed to work with some religious institutions so that no further chance of implication of the petitioner at the hands of the police is possible, under the circumstances the petitioner will report once in every week before the priest of local temple who will try to keep the petitioner involved in the temple activities for the next six months. After the expiry of six months the petitioner will be required to file a certificate granted by the priest about his activities in the court below. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)