IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11407 of 2009 1. UMA PASWAN, son of Sarvjit Paswan 2. Ramjit Paswan, son of Bhagalu Paswan Both resident of village Gohin, P.S. Darihat, District Rohtas Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 01.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners were allowed bail under orders dated 14.11.2008, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37221 of 2008 with direction to the court below to verify their antecedent and if they were not made accused in any other case, besides the case in which they were allowed bail under orders dated 14.11.2008, then they were to be released on bail. It appears, petitioners have not been released on bail, as besides the present case, they are also accused in other cases. In the circumstances, there is no question of modifying order dated 14.11.2008, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37221 of 2008. This application is, accordingly, rejected. Petitioners are at liberty to apply for bail after furnishing complete information about their antecedent in the petition. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)