BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12684 of 2011 1 AROCKIA PERKMANS RAVI 2 S.ERUDHAYARAJ 3 E.RATINAMMAL 4 R.SUSEELA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI CITY IN CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 498(A) of IPC r/w Sections 3 and 4 of TNPWH Act and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant, no FIR has been registered and petition enquiry is pending. 3. Considering the rival submission made on either side, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioners under guise of enquiry and the respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs.State of West Bengal reported in AIR(1997) SC 610. 4. With above observation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- 22/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI CITY 2 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate SR.No.33161 ssk/27.09.2011 /4c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12684 of 2011 Date :22/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/