.^ \* !^-. (L ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.GJ WRIT PETITION N0. 3&5'7 /2QQ4 PETITIONER '^)-: ^•^ ..^".s^;^y Gustaff Tirky, son of Poulus Tirki, aged about 42 years, occupation - Government Service - Senani (Arakshak) No. 319, 31st Battalion, (Presently 6th Battalion) Raigarh, S.A.F., Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), resident of village Barpali, P.S. Kartal, Distt., Korba (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPQNDENTS 4. The State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough : the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C G) The Director General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (CG) Inspector General of Police, S.A.F., Supela, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Superintendent of Police, Armed Forces, (31st Battalion), presently 6th Battalion, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT_PETITION_UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ass I^: HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURB CHHATriSGARHiBIIASPUR Sin^e Bench: Hon'ble Sbtl Satisfa K. Afftihotri, J. W.P. No. 3857 of 2004 Petitioner Respondents Versus GustafTirky State of Chhattisgarh and others Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner. Siat. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (13t- June, 2006) 1. I.A. No. 3252/2006, this is an appUcation for wifhdrawal offhe petition. 2. The petitioner wants to wifhdraw fhis petition, on the ground that ,.the petitioner has been assiired by fhe respondents/aufhority to grant fhe reUef claiined ia fhis petition, to which learaed couasel appearing for the respondents has no objection. The application is aUowed. 2. Consequenfly, fhe^writ petition is disinissed as wifhdrawn. No order as to costs. -—-—- satish K. Agnihotn. i>y-