17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 137/2011 SHAKTI CABLES Petitioner Through: Mr. I.C. Kumar & Mr. S.N. Jha, Advocates along with Mr. Vinesh Batla, proprietor of the firm. versus JAS WANT KAUR Respondent Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN - ORDER % 27.09.2011 CM No. 8477/2011 Today Mr. Vinesh Batla, proprietor of the petitioner firm (tenant) says that in case only three months' period is granted to him to vacate the tenanted premises then he may not press the revision petition on merits. Counsel for the respondent has no objection if that much time is given to the petitioner for vacating the tenanted premises. In view of the aforesaid, the date for disposal of the revision petition, which is already fixed for 251h January, 2012 is preponed for today itself and that date stands cancelled. In view of the statement of the proprietor of the petitioner firm this petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the petitioner is granted three month's time to vacate the tenanted premises and the oral undertaking given by him today for vacating the premises• within the said period is accepted. 9' SEPTEMBER 27, 2011 nk HAJ/ 11 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified