•^, (D ^ F'fo^r, ff3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA7URE AT BILASPURrcHHATTISGARH) ~7; 7• : WRIT PFTmON NO.S%5'^ /2QQ5 PETITIONER: ^i ^ ^.^ ^J^ .y ^""^ ..••' VERSUS Sri Mahamaya Devi Co-Operati.ve Housing Society Through: The President Vinay Nampaltiwar S/o A,R. Nampalliwar/Aged about 40 years, R/o Chhota Para, Raipur C.G. RESPQNDENTS .-.1^^"^ ^' l)/ The state of Chhaftisgarh Through the secretary housing and environment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G The Director town and country planing, Raipur, C.G. ^ The deputy director housing ancl environment, Raipur, C.G. ^7( PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE.OF APPROPRIATE WRITS. DIRECTIONS AND/OR ORDERS DETAILS OF THE PETITION XI-HC-22 ^T^T^T ^^3TT^T ^nw^rfgcT 3F^ ^TPTT^PT, ^Tfl^ll<o, ^<rtl<iy 3TT^?T *11^(N11 Sh^licft OTM5|Ct» ^.^.^..3..^[^ ^i^i g^iw^fer 25-7-2005 Shri S-C. Verma, coun^el <=hl^?d41-1 ^i^<nT^tel:^'<Ri<^i< ^3T^T3TI^r for the petitioner, Singh Tl|iiakur, 6ovt. Advocate for the State/ Shri Yashwant respondents. Heard both the counsei. The petitioner has pre^erred this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution petitioner is that the petitione| housing actiyities. The petition| 28-12-2001 bearing Khasra No| Telibandha, Raipur anct physicej the petitioner. Thereafter, th| that lond and given possessi ^f India. The main grievance of the ^ js a registered society and engaged in ^r society was allott'ed piece of bnd on ^360/1, area 89,298 sq. ft. situated at |1 pos^ssion of the samewas given to ^ petitioner constructed the houses on ^n to the members also. However, respondent No.3 ordered to hc^nd over 15% of the bnd to the weaker iior section and advance possession^ was also taken by respondents. After taking over the possession c| amendment has been jncprporfl|ted in the scheme wherein it has been provided that if the builder/cc|lonizer is ready to take back the same land, in that case he is boynd the rate prescribed. Fur1+ier case of the f 15% of the land by respondents, to pay a premium of the same bnd at petitioner is that after the said amendment, the petitioner ma<|te repres^ntations to the respondents that he is ready to pay 1+ie prescribed rates and 15%^ of'fltli^ftishd XI-HC-22 3n^?T^)T f^TT^^n^T ^RT^^&fN' 'v Barve <l'y,^,< "yy/ Hroc^TT^WT^ 3^ ^l^ld^l, ^T(1<rt^<o, facrtKriy 311^1 M5|Ct» ^ 200 f^R^ Learned counsel for the <»)i^t<n41^W^fffr te^^^K ^3Tf^1T3TT^T which ^as taken from him be h^nded over to him but the respondents are hot deciding the representc^tion. [petitioner submitted that respondent No.l be directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner to which learned coui|isel for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned coi^nsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and .circumst<xn4es of the case, respondent No.l is directed to decide the repre^tation made by the petitioner within a period of 2 months in an obje^tive n?anner. after considering all the points raised by the petitioner With 1+ie direction afore^aid/thepetition stands disposed of. In view of this order, disposed of. Parties are entitled for ^ertified copy of this order, |n accordance with law. M.(W.)P. No.2776/2005 also stands Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^fet)