IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5185 of 2008 Decided on: 21.09.2010 Dr. P.K. Nanda …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous due to intervening development. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 21, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?