IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 611 OF 2011 SHRI ARUN BALKRISHNA DEVARI AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SHASHIKANT RAMA NAIK BORKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Gaurish Agni, Advocate for the Petitioners. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 27th September, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri Agni, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners. 2. After hearing the matter for sometime, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners craves leave to withdraw the above Petition with liberty to challenge the impugned Order in case any adverse Order is passed against the Petitioners at the final disposal of the suit. The learned Counsel further pointed out that the learned Judge should not be influenced by such findings arrived in the impugned Order whilst disposing of the temporary injunction application and further proceedings in the suit. The apprehension of the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners cannot be accepted as the findings arrived at by the learned Judge whilst passing the impugned Order was only for the purpose of deciding the application filed by the Petitioners for striking out the pleadings and further proceedings in the suit and the application for temporary injunction would be decided on its own merits. 3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*