1 crap3106.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3106 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant [Orig.Complainant] VERSUS Ramesh Rangnathrao Sonwane ...Respondent [Orig.Accused] ..... Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for the applicant/State Shri Sandeep Deshmukh, advocate for respondent ...... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 22 nd November, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned respective counsel for the parties. 2 crap3106.11 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant/State (original complainant), seeking leave to file appeal, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 21.4.2011, rendered by the learned Special Judge, Osmanabasd, in Spl. Case (AC) No. 4 of 2010, thereby acquitting the respondent (original accused) for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 3 I have perused the impugned judgment, dated 21.4.2011 and the record and proceedings with the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties. 4 Having the comprehensive view of the matter, it appears that the matter requires reconsideration. 5 Hence, present application is allowed. Leave to file appeal is granted. Present application be treated as appeal. 6 Admit. 7 Shri Sandeep Deshmukh, learned counsel accepts service of notice for the respondent, after admission. 3 crap3106.11 8 Respondent to furnish same bail but fresh bond before the trial court within a period of four weeks from today. 9 R. and P. be sent back to the concerned court. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap3106.11