HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon’b!e Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ. w.P.(S) No. s18 of 2011 Petitioner Janak Ram Bhriha, Aged about 33 years, S/o Shri Puneet Ram R/o Gram Lariya, Post-Rohasi, District — Raipur (C.G.) Vs. Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya', Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Present: Shri Siddhartha Shukia, counsel for the petitioiner Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State O R A L O R D E R (Passed on 10‘“ February, 2011 Per Dhirendra Mishra J Heard. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has chalienged the provisions of fixation of quaiification as second division post graduation for appointment for the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-I under the rule of~ Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment and Conditions of Services) Rules, 2007 as ultra-virus of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India being discriminative. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a bunch of identical petitions have already been disposed of by this Court vide order & dated 015‘ July, 2010 passed in Ram Chandra Ram & Anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & athers and other connected writ petitions and challenge to the constitutional validity of the above provisions have been rejected. However, while dismissing the petition, the petitioners have been given opportunity to appraise their grievances by way of tiling representation before the appropriate authority of the State Government and respondent/State, in turn, has been directed to decide the representation within three months from the date of production of a copy of the order of the High Court. He further submits that this petition may also be disposed of in similar terms. 3. The above prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the State. 4. In that view of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the State Government apprising grievances raised in this writ petition and if such representation is tiled, the same shall be considered and proper decision shall be taken thereon as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a cOpy of this order along with representation. Sd/- ‘l Sd/— Dhirendra Mishra z‘ Rangnath Chandrakar Judge Judge Vijay I.