IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2007 / 29TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 11911 of 2004(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ASIYUMMA, W/O. MUHAMMED MASTER, POOCHAKAD, PALLIKARA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. KANHANGAD, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARGOD AT KANHANGAD, P.O. KANHANGAD, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. T.B. RAMANI FOR R1 & R2. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.11911/2004: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 03/10/2003 ISSUED BY THE R.1. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE OBJECTION DTD. 16/10/2003. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE R.2. DTD. 20/12/2004. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No. 11911 of 2004-R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 20th day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT The learned Government Pleader submits that the report as stated in the order dated 2-4-2004 was obtained and the delay was only because, the petitioner had not communicated that order in spite of the direction of this Court. It is also pointed out that the petitioner had remitted the entire amounts covered by the impugned assessment. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/