C.^-[^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONNO. ^6_'__/2006 PETITIONER: ^ ^-" >.«" \> Girdhari Ran9^ son of Late Motilal Rana, aged about 52 years, resident of ^o 0^f-^'"^^":""\-.-' Sonarpal, Tehsil Jagdalpur ....-••" c...^. •"\4^y" DistrictBastar. ^\A-' Vs 'RESPONDENTS: m'-il. <4. State of Chhattisgarh Through; the Secretary, .General Administration Departruent/Ministry of School Education. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. /'2. The Collector, District Bastar. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 sn^r^Tf^Ni ?raT3II^Ts»)li<o •/ t^w^n sf>*iich 'S^^W^KI, a-rflu'IS, RlclKiy ^.W.£..^.'^t/.0.^200 Sll^l ^ath (v(3'sl<«'if) TOITW fff^T SII^T impugrjed Shri B.P. Sharma, counsell Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. copy. Heard. Sy the instant petition| correctness of the order dated has been transferred from Pri Schooi, Chingnaar, Farasgaon. The petitioner is working ths petitioner aaainst the ii within a perjod of less than two is that in the Primary Schooi, S^ and 90 students are studying th^ therefore, the fate ofthe studentsl been taken into consideration b\] making the transfer of the petitioner submitted that the petit] representation to respondent No.| to which counsel for respondentsl Havina heard learned facts and circumstances of the on merits of the case, the pr; petitioner appears to be just, falr is ailowed to make a detalled repl his grievances, annexing a the petitioner has questioned the P7-07-2006 (Annexure P/1) whereby he m^ry School, Sonarpal, Bastar to Primary petitio^er *I''<IM<II'I ii*<CTTffteI^'<Ri<^i< ^a.rf^iTsn^T for the petitioner. for the State/respondents, on advance ^s Assistant Teacher. The grievance of order is that he has been transferred y^ars. Another grievance of the petitioner ^narpai the petitioner is the oniy teacher h^re. After his transfer no one is left and |wiil be in jeopardh^ and this fact has not the transferring authority at the time of Therefore, learned counsel for the joner may be aliowed to make a detailed 11 and he be directed to deeide the same, Ihas no objection. for the parties, having regard to the cjase and without expressing any opinion !-4yer made by learned counsel for the ^nd reasonable. Therefore, the petitioner il'esentation to resoondent No.1 raisina a! of the instant writ petition ancj its couhsel copy P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ^1+<WI sh+lich 3^ ^ll.illcl^, 8lTflu'l(o, RlCll^y .^3aAL ^[ 200 311^1 tiaw (11?<!3'!"<<T) 3f1^T^TR-li+ aw3:n^T»H ^•M^^l <^ ?T(ITWHf?cT3n^T 2_- thle annexures wlthin a period of ten d^ No.1 is directed to decide the sam^ date of its receipt, considering al an obj'ective manner, in accordance| With the aforesaid direction, Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.: Parties are entitled for certifi4d l^ys from today and in turn, respondent within a period of one month from the grievances raised by the petltioner in with !aw. fhe writ petition stands disposed of. 3P82/2006 aiso stands disposed of. copy of this order. °hi<ifci<)1-i HWMTfftec^<Ri'tdi<. ^si^Tsn^r ^.c.^ AOO ^^- ^ P.T.O. % ^