IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46496 of 2009 1. JAGARNATH JHA @ JAGANNATH JHA 2. SANJAY JHA @ SANJAY KUMAR JHA ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 3.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that parties are at litigating terms, several cases are pending in between them and petitioners are alleged for kidnapping and snatching of chain and wrist watch of complainant’s son. It is submitted that the matter was thoroughly investigated by the I.O. who submitted final form finding the case false. Criminal antecedent was also found of complainant’s son who was absconding in several cases and question raises that if complainant’s son did not return, how complainant could know about theft committed of his chain and wrist watch even cognizance is taken and petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission. In the facts of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication 2 of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Complaint Case No. 740 C/2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)