IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21840 of 2009 NUNU PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.07.2009 This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Petitioner was made accused in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 397 of the Penal Code. The date of occurrence as per F.I.R. is 19.09.1991. It is contended that he was granted bail on merits. Records indicate that he absconded since 1995 as his bail bonds were cancelled. It appears that he has recently surrendered on 16.03.2009. Learned Sessions Judge has considered his application for bail and rejected granting him liberty to renew prayer for bail after commitment of the case. Having regard to all the aspects of the matter, this court disposes of the present application in the following manner: No sooner the case is committed to the court of session, the trial court shall release him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S.Case no.144 of 1991, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the 2 petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear before the court below in person on the date fixed at the trial. In case of default on two consecutive dates the trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)