IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1318 OF 2006 1. Raju Kakumal Rizwani & anr. ... Petitioners V/s. 1. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr. R.S.Apte with Mr.Ramesh Ramamurthy for the petitioners. Mr.V.M.Phal, AGP for the respondent no.1. Mr.Rui Rodrigues with Mr.Goswami Mandar and with Mr.N.D.Sharma for the respondent no.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED 19th September, 2006 19th September, 2006 19th September, 2006 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The limited grievance which the petitioner has is that he has preferred an appeal before the respondent no.2-Chief Settlement Commissioner for compensation, Pool Properties cum Chief Custodian of Evacuee Property. That appeal is pending and not disposed of. In such similar other matters eventhough the Act has been repealed, we have directed the respondent concerned to dispose of the pending application according to law after hearing the parties who would be interested. In the light of that, the Chief Settlement Commissioner for compensation Pool ( 2 ) Properties cum Chief Custodian of Evacuee Property is directed to dispose of the pending appeal according to law at any rate not later than the date from the copy of this order being served upon him. 3. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. 4. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]