AWARD HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, AT CIRCUIT BENCH DHARWAD BEFG.RF.: THE LOK ., A,DALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD CONCILIATORS PRESENT HON’BLE MR.JUST1CE K GOVINDARAJULU AND SRLK L PATIL, MEMBER 11ançusFirsea1No9557 2007 Lok Adalat No.231/2010 BETWEEN: AFROZKHAN S/C) LIYAJHATH ALIKHAN GURANNI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 0CC BUSINESS R, T T (PQS R P Aj RANFN3ENNUR DIST HAVERI. ... APPELLANT :Bv SriMAHESH WC)DEYAR. ADV AND I. ANIL KJIvIAR .5/0 ASHOK lUGER AGE MAJOR 0CC BUSINESS TT1T(ROccpN\p DJT PPT DIVISIONAL MANAGER INDIA AS UTP/Il NCF CO. LTD.. A A TT ) T ‘ CHAMARAJPET DAVANAGERE, ... RESPONDENTS THIS MFA FILET) UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED. 2 4,2007 PASSED IN MVC NO250 2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL CIVIL JUDGE (SR DN) AND DDL MACT RANEBFNNUR This Misct lianeous First ppeal filed against the Judgment and Aard passed h\ he abou-’ Trib nal having hoen referred Ink Adalat fl 12 04 20 0 on inc ot for scttli nent bcfon Lok dalat II 2010 in tI prrsence of the Officers of Nea India Assurane Co Ltd an( the Advocate appearing for tht respe tnc partaes for th reasons stated in the conciliation order’, I And it is ordered and decreed that Respondent No,2 shall par and the Appellant shall reeivt t global compensation h Rs 0 000/ (Rupees Seventy Thousand onlyi in addition to the amount a arded hx the Tribunal, in full and final settlemnt of th laini 2 And it is furthci i den d ar d decreed that th sc a nd Responder t shah deposit the said amount before the Tribunal mUthin six we ks Irom he late of prtpaiatior I Ic award Ia irig wlicl t e said ar nint shall carrt ntc est at Q(, om ‘he date ot default nil the dat- of depnst. 3 Aad s furtL ordt rca ‘-nd Jeert od that then shIi be rn tf u J “ \1 n is i i i \r ( u I r I .t 2S day of November 2010. \ r V-a R ad MEMBER SECRETARY -0 1 c I M tJ1( (CT PT Th(tJ PPVJrT (flMMVITP CIRC1 ‘IT BNC’H AT DHMWAD Misc Fts Anneal No(flFA 1 hokAdalatNo F3JWEEN: 4ppeliant/ a AND: ft%\L. UJf—c Respondents JOINT MEMO This peal filed against the judgment and Aw in ç1 II No. on the file of the MACI’ eW referred to thi Lok Adalat by the Hon’ble High Court u/ a 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. rhe parties to the appeal have settled their claim before the Lok ‘\dalat on the following rerms The ppellant! a bas/ have agreed to receive and Respondent No L Cc Lid) has agreed to pay a sum of Pa. Pupes ojalv’ in addinor to v1aat has beer avarded by th Tribunal full mc 1 iloa :Suunt n th’ bum ba igee r deposit th said amount b ft t to r ut sr. ve’k f am h dax of oreparatior. sE iv arc tailir g u 1uc i Ii at ic am i hill r r i tere t 9° a ft ‘1 f ujj 4jjl Ii S S S tjYat S: I )ftI\ -s sro ‘atids . thzs seTtlexneru C r. is