1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.552 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5457 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5458 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.741 OF 2005 Govind Purshottam Athavle & Ors. ..Appellants. V/s. Anant Purushottam Athavle. ..Respondent. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.423 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2007 Shri Anant Purushottam Athavale ..Appellant. V/s. Shri Madhukar Purushottam Athavale ..Respondent. Mr.S.S.Kanetkar for Godbole for appellants in F.A.No.552/02 and for respondent in F.A.No.423/06. Mr.S.V.Pitre for respondent in F.A.No.552/02 and for appellant in F.A.No.423/06. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : MARCH 5, 2007. DATE : MARCH 5, 2007. DATE : MARCH 5, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Counsel for the parties have produced consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates in the respective appeals. The same are taken on record. 2 2. Both the appeals as well as civil applications in the respective appeals are disposed of in terms of consent terms. 3. Appellant No.3 in First Appeal No.552 of 2002 and appellant No.2 in First Appeal No.423 of 2006 are present in the court and accept the correctness of the consent terms presented in the court. Refund of court fees as per rule.