IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37062 of 2011 1. Hari Kishun Mahto 2. Shyam Babu Mahato alias Shyam Mahato, son of Ramagaya Mahto 3. Ramgyan Mahto, son of late Ram Lagan Mahto 4. Shanti Devi, wife of Ramagaya Mahto 1 to 4 are resident of village – Mahangua, P.S. – KUndua Chainpur, District – East Champaran. 5. Ram Shobhit Singh alias Ram Somit Singh, son of Kailash Singh 6. Meena Devi, wife of Ram Shobhit Singh Both resident of village – Ram Nagra, P.S. – Aurai, District – Muzaffarpur. ---------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ********* 03. 17.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Kundwa Chanipur P.S. Case No. 28/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. C-733/2010 corresponding to Tr. No. 2014/2010, for offences under Sections 366(A) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, are name accused in this case of kidnapping of daughter of the informant. Submission is that police after investigation only submitted charge-sheet against one of the co- accused though family members of the petitioners but did not sent up the petitioner for trial, however, cognizance has been taken. It is further submitted that co-accused against whom charge-sheet has been submitted has also been released on bail after brief detention by a Bench of this Court. Further the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has said nothing against these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sikrahna, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Kundwa Chanipur P.S. Case No. 28/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. C-733/2010 corresponding to Tr. No. 2014/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition with respect to petitioner nos. 1, 2 3 and 5 to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)