IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 29328 of 2009 Between: S.Hemalatha ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 29328 of 2009 ORDER : According to the petitioner, she approached I Town Police Station, Anantapur and gave a complaint against one K.Govinda Reddy and others and on the basis of a complaint given by her, a case in Crime No.12 of 2006 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 506 (2), 323 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 3 (i) (x) of the Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. After completion of investigation, a charge sheet was filed and the accused therein were tried by a competent Criminal Court in Sessions Case No.633 of 2007. However, the said case was ended in acquittal vide judgment dated 26-02-2009. On account of the said rivalry, the accused therein are trying to interfere with her personal liberty and are threatening her with dire consequences. In that context, she approached the respondents 2 and 3 and gave a representation requesting them to provide required police protection. However, as no orders have been passed, she approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home and perused the record. 3. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner already gave a representation to the respondents 2 and 3, and the same is pending consideration before them, the writ petition can be disposed of with certain directions to the respondents concerned. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to look into the said representation ascertaining the fact and do the needful in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ January 19, 2010 kvr