IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2008 / 2ND SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 18004 of 2008(R) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- SMT.POULY GEORGE W/O. GEORGE, PARAKKA HOUSE, EZHATTUMUGHAM, P.O. ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.18004/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DT. 7.2.07. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DT. 20.5.07 INTIMATING THE PRODUCTION OF CURRENT RECORDS OF THE VEHICLE. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 18004 OF 2008 R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T Implementation of Ext. P1 by which permit was granted to the petitioner subject to settlement of timing is what is sought for in the writ petition. Learned Govt. Pleader points out that timing conference was convened on 22.10.2007, but however, the petitioner informed on 24.10.2007 that he did not want to operate on that timing. It is stated that thereafter no further action has been taken by the respondent. 2. In view of this, though I am not prepared to accept the plea of the petitioner that delay has been caused by the respondent in settlement of timings, since Ext. P1 remains to be implemented I direct that the respondent shall convene a fresh timing conference and implement Ext. P1, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-