IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.984 of 2007 RAM LAKHAN SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 11.11.2008 The petitioner is the informant of Rajoun P.S. Case No.147 of 2007 dated 9.8.2007 under sections 363 and 366A of the Penal Code. The informant alleged that the accused persons namely Gonu @ Dharmendra Yadav, Balmiki Yadav and others have abducted his daughter. Learned counsel for the State has filed a counter affidavit from perusal of which it would appear that the Superintendent of Police, Banka has himself supervised the case and has found the same to be true and he has issued necessary direction for arresting the absconding accused persons. It further appears from paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit that the S.H.O., Rajoun has taken all possible steps for conducting raid time and again as it would appear from Annexure-D to the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused persons are giving threat of dire consequences if the case is not withdrawn. He submits that the accused persons are in fact hiding in the Banka district itself. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, it will be open to the petitioner to make complaint to the S.H.O., Rajoun or the Superintendent of Police, Banka in respect of threat meted to him and his family members. It will be also open to the petitioner to cooperate in the investigation and to give where about of - 2 - KHAN the accused persons. In case any such complaint or information is given, the police will take immediate steps to do the needful and nab the absconding accused. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)