mw,m,m mm mm (W) W § m 200 ( is that e piied before th resondent Grievance of the etitione carriage permit on 4.12.2007. After submissio of this application the respondents have not taken any decision on his application ev though two meetings have been held treafter for consideration f s applications. In these circumstances, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of suitable direction to the respondents to consid his a lcation and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. i 'm annm v~.~vuu} pr No. 1 for grant of regular st n e he o u h mm «Aymmt GR 2? DHIRENDRA MISHRA. J. AL GRDER g h ao e p e a er pt l I WW,§? H1 Q,W h mm m 200 w@wn?$ C¥*ER?) @7 WWW ammm mwm z W Learned counsel anoeari he haS no obiection if such direct! in View of above, the insta to the respondent No. 1 to consic petitioner for grant of regular sta months from the date of rece accordance wtth law. 5d]- J r r 1 Dhirendra MiSilt?i Judge mwenww naaft‘awm for the State/respondents submits that on is issued to the respondente. nt petition is disposed of with a directien er the appiication of Annexure P/1 of the 1e carriage permit within a period of two ipt of certified copy of this order, in