IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9060 OF 2006 Date of Decision: 04.12.2006 Neelam Devi ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. ... Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Joginder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Sewak, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Ms. Manjuli, Advocate, for respondent No.3. J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that the petitioner has since been appointed against the post of clerk. In view of the above, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the aforesaid factual position. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge December 04, 2006 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge