Crl. Misc. No.M-35274 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH ***** Crl. Misc. No.M-35274 of 2010 Date of Decision: 05.01.2011 Jai Bhagwan and Ors. … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Anr. …Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI ***** 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. S.K. Hooda. Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent No.2. ***** RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL) The petitioners seek the quashing of FIR No.323 dated 31.7.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, registered at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak on the basis of compromise. The said FIR was registered on the statement of respondent No.2 – Dharambir. Respondent No.2 – Dharambir is present in the Court. He has stated that the matter has been compromised vide Compromise Deed (Annexure P-4) and that he does not want to pursue his remedy against the petitioners. Vide order dated 1st December, 2010, the petitioners were granted liberty to appear before the Magistrate for recording the statements in accordance with the compromise arrived between the parties. In compliance of the said order, report has been submitted by the Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak and he has verified the contents of the compromise by recording the statements. Crl. Misc. No.M-35274 of 2010 -2- In view of the judgment in case Kulwinder Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.), Page -1052, the petition is allowed. The above said FIR and all the criminal proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed, on the basis of compromise. JANUARY 05, 2010 (RITU BAHRI) RAJAN JUDGE