1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2608 OF 1986 Devibai Kishindas Makhija & Anr. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Major G.C. Chaudhary, D.K. Makhija & Anr. ...Defendants. Ms. K.C. Nichani for the Plaintiffs. Ms. Kokila Kalka i/by M/s. M.T. Thacker & Associates for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 17TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 The parties have settled the matter out of the court and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 17th February, 2010. It is counter signed by the respective advocates. The same is taken on record and marked “X”. There is no dispute about the signature, authorization and identity. The statement is made that it is well within the framework of law and the record and no third person/party will be affected by this consent terms. All the parties are present in the Court. 2 In view of this, the suit is decreed in terms of consent terms. 3 So far as the order of Court Receiver is concerned, the parties to pay requisite charges and payment without passing Accounts. The parties to Act on the basis of authenticated copy. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)