IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12055 of 2011 Alok Kumar Yadav son of Babu Ram Yadav resident of village and P.O.-Patam, P.S. Naya Ramnagar, Dist.Munger. ---Petitioner. Versus 1. The Railway Board through its I.G./R.P.S.F./New Delhi. 2. The Director General/RPSF, Government of India, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi 3. The Chief Security Commissioner/RPSF Railway Board, New Delhi. 4. The Commandant No. 11 BN/ RPSF/GHZ Headquarter RPSF Garhara Barauni,Bihar ---Respondents. ----------- 02 27.07.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner while serving as constable with 11 Battalion Railway Protection Security Force, Garhara was transferred by issuing movement order dated 15.07.2011 as contained in (Annexure-2). The said order has been impugned in the present writ proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order is in breach of the guidelines contained in Standing Order No. 102 (Annexure-1) wherein normal tenure of posting for a constable is 05 years. It is also the contention that the author of the impugned order (Annexure-2) is not competent authority to effect transfer of constable like the petitioner. It is also contended that petitioner requires sympathetic consideration of the matter since his wife is ill. Learned counsel for the Railways, on the other hand, points out the note appended to the Standing Order which empowers the authority to pass orders of transfer on administrative grounds at any time before completion of tenure in exigencies for service or for administrative reasons. Law is well- settled. If the order is assailed on the 2 ground that the same is in breach of guidelines issued by the employer then the remedy lies in filing representation thereagainst. This Court grants the said liberty to the petitioner. The application is dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )