IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14887 of 2011 CHANDRA MAULI SINGH @ MAULI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 07.09.2010 in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner in the F.I.R. is that he entered into the house of the informant alongwith Anil and Arun Singh when one person fired at the daughter of the informant. Subsequently Anil caused the second fire arm injury to the victim. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Anil was put on trial and he has been acquitted. The petitioner was not aware about the case since he was residing in Kolkatta and was not involved in any other case. The case was initially registered under Section 307 of the I.P.C. and under the Arms Act. It is further submitted that in 164 2 Cr. P.C. statement also suspicion has been raised by the informant and no specific accusation of causing injury has been made. The post mortem reflects two injuries. One injury it is specifically alleged against Anil but the other injury is not alleged specifically against the petitioner though he was named in the F.I.R. but it is not alleged that petitioner made firing. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Samastipur, in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 19 of 2003. Learned court below will positively cancel the bail of the petitioner if he defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)