IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 205 OF 2008 MR. ROSY FERNANDES ... Petitioner Versus DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM THROUGH DIRECTOR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Tonia Lobo, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Guru Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Coram:- S.A. BOBDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 9th April, 2008 P.C.:- Prayer Clause (a) reads as follows:- a) The respondent no.1 be directed to remove or order the removal of all the material scattered around the petitioners shack and which blocking the access to her shack from the public road. Mr. Guru Shirodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 3 states that the Respondent No.1 is in the process of removing the material referred to in prayer clause (a) and further states that it will be removed within two weeks from today. As regards prayer clause(b) Mr. Shirodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate states that of the two illegal shacks referred to, the Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order declaring that the shack by the name "SAMS" is legal. As regards the other shack "PYRAMIDS" Mr. Shirodkar, learned Additional Government Advocate states that that shack is found to be illegal and will be removed in the course of the day. As regards prayer clause (c) the learned Additional Government Advocate states that if the Petitioner makes an application for a temporary beach shack it shall be considered along with the other applications and in accordance with law. The Petitioner has also made a prayer for compensation for the alleged loss suffered by her during the present tourist season. The Petitioner is at liberty to take such action as admissible in law in that regard. In these circumstances, nothing further survives in this petition which is disposed of accordingly. S.A. BOBDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.