HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No. 1526 of 2003 DATED: 06.09.2011 Between:- The Depot Manager .. Appellant A N D 1. M.A. Baig, Driver, APSRTC 2. The Labour Court, Guntur .. Respondents JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This Court, by order dated 24.11.2003, while admitting the Writ Appeal, ordered notices to the respondents, and as there is appearance by the learned Government Pleader for Labour on behalf of the 2nd respondent, the Registry issued Notice to the 1st respondent, but the same was returned “unserved”. Again, this Court, by order dated 12.11.2010, permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to take out personal notice to the 1st respondent by registered post with acknowledgement due and file proof of service, in default, the appeal stands dismissed against the 1st respondent. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the 1st respondent nor does the record show any proof of service of notice to the 1st respondent. Inasmuch as the order dated 12.11.2010 passed by this Court is not complied with, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J 06.09.2011 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J bcj