1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.355 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1824 OF 2004 Messrs. Airpac Exports. ... Plaintiff. vs. Rupesh Kumar Gautam & others. .... Defendants. And State Bank of India. ... Respondent. --- Mr.Devang Shah, for Plaintiff. Mr.S.K.Chaurasiya i/b. A.M.Saraogi, for Defendants. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 17th March,, 2006 P.C.:- 1. This is a notice of motion taken out by the plaintiff. The Defendants are served and are represented by a lawyer. They have chosen not to file any reply. When I asked the learned Counsel appearing for defendants whether he wants to argue though no reply is 2 filed, he declined to argue. In the absence of any reply, accepting the averments in the affidavit filed in support of notice of motion at face value, the ad-interim order dated 8.2.2005 is confirmed. The notice of motion is disposed of. ---