@® (1)5{a’aL_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. §1:No.$%9 12005 Petitioner ' / Rishi Kumar Patel, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Kriparam Patel, occupation — Manager, Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Malyadit, Kilkila Jila — Union Dharamjaigarh, resident of Village Piparhi, Tah. Lailunga, District Rajgarh (Chhattisgarh) Resgondents Versus / 1. State of Chhattisgarh - Through — the Secretary, Department of Society, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Registrar, Department of . Firms and Society, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) / 3. The Deputy Registrar, Department of Firms and Society, Raigarh (C.G.) Zila Union — Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C. G .), THROUGH — Its Managing Director. 2 @CQ 5. The President, Prathmik Lailp’lu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti, Kjlkila, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) 6. Subhash Chandra Bhera, Pra’rhmik Lééu Vanopaj Sahkari Samiti, Kilkila, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, Dist. Raiggrh (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTERIORAI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTIONS OR ORDER w Raju Petitioner, who was Mane Samiti Maryadit. KilkHa, has bee dated 1 1H 0/2006 (Annexure/P-1). Remova: of the petitior Chhattisgarh Co-operative Societ that being a dispute, it should h instead of doing so, petitioner he i am of the View that hi : a ger of 'Prathmik Laghu Vanopaj Sahkari n removed from his services vide ietter er faiis within Section '64 of the es Act, 1960 (henceforth, “the Act”) and ave been referred to the Registrar, but s invoked writjurisdiction of this Court. should first refer the dispute to the Registrar and thereafter if any exigency arises, he may approach the High Court. With the aforesaid directk motion stage itself. in view of the above, MW. Certified copy as per rules Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ate W) m, the writ petition is dismissed at the =.No-4626/2006W today. XI-HC—22 mast w fawn; straw m aha 311w swat aha \ aamiaa‘h waifa teat Wit sW 311w 2511 112006 Shri Amit Sharma, Counse for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard.