... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.08 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.08 OF 2006 REVISION APPLICATION NO.08 OF 2006 M/s. Kelga Techno Sales Pvt. Ltd ...Applicant Vs. M/s.Rishi Packers Ltd ...Respondent Mrs Pranali Kakade i/by Shri V.A.Sugdare for the Applicant. Shri T.J.Pandian & Komal Singh for the Respondent No.1. Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 17, 2006. : OCTOBER 17, 2006. : OCTOBER 17, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The challenge in this revision Application is to order of conviction and sentence under section 138 read with section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Applicant and the first Respondent have arrived at settlement. Consent terms duly signed by the parties and their Advocates are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The learned Advocate appearing for the first Respondent states that the first Respondent has agreed to compound the offence. 2. Undertakings in clauses (b) and (c) of the consent terms given by the Applicants are accepted. 3. In view of the clause (d) of the consent terms ... 2 ... and settlement between the parties, I pass the following order: (i) Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A). (ii) The first Respondent is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- deposited by the Applicants in this court. (iii) Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE