IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 RSA.No. 457 of 2008() --------------------- AS.89/1998 of SUB COURT, TIRUR OS.10/1984 of MUNSIFF COURT,PARAPPANANGADI .................... APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT ------------------------------------------------- KOOLIPILAKKAL PALLIYALIL CHEKKUTTY, S/O.KUNHIMOIDEEN, AGED 53 YEARS, ABDURAHIMAN NAGAR VILLAGE, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF ----------------------------------- KOOLIPILAKKAL MUHAMMEDAJI'S DAUGHTER, THITHACHUMMAKUTTY AMMA, W/O.KOOLIPILAKKAL KUNHALI, AGED 56 YEARS, VENGARA AMSOM, KUTTUR DESOM, THIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR FOR R1 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J ........................................... RSA No. 457 of 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 JUDGMENT Appellant is the defendant in O.S.10 of 1984 on the file of Munsiff Court, Parappanangadi. Respondent is the plaintiff. Decree for recovery of possession was granted by the trial court. It was confirmed by Sub Court, Tirur in A.S.89 of 1998. The decree is challenged in the second appeal. 2. I.A.2636 of 2011 is filed under Order XXIII Rule 3(1) of Code of Civil Procedure jointly by appellant and the respondent stating that the disputes were settled amicably and seeking modification of the decree in terms of the compromise. The compromise petition is signed by both appellant and respondent and their counsel. I.A.2636 of 2011 is allowed. Compromise recorded. Appeal is disposed modifying the decree in terms of the compromise. Compromise petition with the plan appended thereto form part of the decree. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk