1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1271 of 2009 Praveen Chopda & anr. ...Petitioners v/s. Rajesh Omprakash Murarka & 4 ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1272 OF 2009 Praveen Chopda & anr. ...Petitioners v/s. Master Harshvardhan, Minor through Rajesh Omprakash Murarka & 4 ors. ...Respondents Ms. Mukta Singh Gobse for the Petitioners. Ms. Geeta Shastri -AGP for the respondents. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED:- July 14, 2009. P.C. Not on Board. Upon production taken on Board. The order challenged in this Writ Petition is passed by the Authority in exercise of powers under the provisions of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. 2 The said enactment is not enlisted in Rule-636 of the Original Side Rules. As a result, this Writ Petition cannot proceed before the Learned Single Judge of this Court. 2. Realising this position, Counsel for the Petitioners submits that in that case Petitioners be permitted to amend the Writ Petition so that it can be one under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no difficulty in acceding to this request. Petitioners are permitted to amend the Writ Petition. That amendment be carried out within one week from today, failing which Petition to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. 3. If amendment is carried out in time, the matter will then have to proceed on the Appellate Side of this Court. Liberty to apply. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)