Hgé'i CCni3R‘i‘ 0? €H¥b§f "J‘’3SE5ARW: EIL&S§$§J‘§ mg? Petmg $9. 3§é§’ 6f 2mm 14 Bhola Ram $ahu: Agea about 4D years, Sic X am Sam. {f‘fl‘A \vx..5. (Wm? Peii’i'mn under Amme 22? of the Comtéfu‘iim 07‘ ém’ia.) §E }-§€m”i3ie M”. $3‘E‘S‘sh K 3%g:?.§§'wir§, a $RAL 0§E§ER {Passed an tms 23m day away; 29:33; Learned counsei appearing for the paitieners submits that ihe T’riouna; has passed award aiaiad 81-8288“ (Annexure Pf2) m Bofaram and amorher Vs‘ Narayar: Sam am: anoi’ner, whereby it was ciéreoi'ed 1:0 deposit a sum of Rs.2.GC IaKhs m a fixed deposit accouni with Siaie 3am of indore, aranch Baicda Bazar. The Qe'titio‘rxers wamen‘ i0 cansiruct the house: merefere; ihey mede an apniicaibn :‘ai‘ reieasmg the tea? sum of reszw iax’f’e The Ceur‘: beicw, afier having consi ered me case cf the ee‘ti‘tioner; eermitt’ed the :ae‘tzmners to wkharaw a 3w“ of Re.§0,08i}f— m two msteiimente by Order da’ied uy Drder daieci 294—2008 \ (emnexure 'r'am . ! r 2‘ Smi. ‘f'asfwcéa Baz, Aged 4 Wd/a Saiaram $ahu; Bot; TahsJ Versus RE$?€3N§3ENT§ ”r. Narayan PraSaQ‘ Sahu‘ iaged abcut y SW 1a Sahu; Rig. Ve g Aaram _ Raipur. 2‘ {:nyar Sam, Sis. Dhana R, ' enira? Jai? 3% x 1‘ ‘3 Limte‘ Erma Ewurance Co. Brancn Manager, peiiticners impugz‘i the vaéimry of the Order dazed 294-; {Amexure Pm on me ground that a sum cf RsiSQGwl— permiti‘ed by the Court bemw far wi‘thdrawaé of ‘i‘he amok}??? is not su??%c§ent t0 construci the hcutsa 3) Be thai as it may, what was the ameunt diremed i0 be ciemsifec; m the fixed neposét 0y award datea‘ 3'1 -8~2GD7 (fannexure W2} &$ not ciear. Gr: query asie what is the award, why same amcum was_c’%recied m 13c aegcosiieci in fixerj Cemah", whai' was the tefai armunt of me award, :Eamad ccunsei agpaarmg f0; “a Geiiticaera ressed ms inabiiiiy to prcduce a com a? tne award ram-d repr: In rise aueriea. came? adjudicated upsn and m3 reiier‘ can med .; Aoooro‘ihgiv irrepeiihorx oemg devoid ofmerih r p For wan? or adequate materiai, ”mie oaee be g oaaE ,‘VI sdl_ Judge I Satish K. Agnihotri r