IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3554 of 2011 MUNNA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 02/ 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Admittedly, in course of investigation, victim was recovered and her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C was recorded. The victim has stated about involvement of the petitioner and some other co-accused persons in the alleged crime but submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that contents of the first information report disclosed that there was love affairs between the victim and one Sandeep. It is further pointed out by him that as a matter of fact, victim eloped with aforesaid Sandeep and after six months, when she returned to her home, her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C was recorded under pressure of her family members. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as this aspect of the matter that as per report of the List and Computer section of this court, co-accused Ajay Singh, having more or less similar allegation, has been granted privilege of bail vide order dated 17.8.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 24509/2010, let petitioner, Munna Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B. Shukla, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Motihari in Sugauli P.S. Case no. 221 of 2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)