IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43241 of 2008 RAVI RANJAN RAI, SON OF BACCHU RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DULLAM CHAK, P.S. SAHAR(CHOWRI), DISTRICT BHOJPUR----------PETITONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR-------------------OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02. 20.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act as he is alleged to have shot at the deceased along with two others, namely, Dilip Rai and Ram Mahal Rai, accused no. 2 and 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from the post mortem report it appears that the deceased suffered only two injuries , as such, it is difficult to pinpoint that petitioner is author of one of the two injuries. Such submission on behalf of the petitioner can only be appreciated if any of the three, who are alleged to have shot at the deceased are admitted to the privilege of bail. In the circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and this application is, accordingly, rejected with liberty to renew prayer for bail if either Dilip Rai or Ram Mahal Rai is admitted to the privilege of bail. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)