i @ WW,W,W SINGLE BENCH; HON’BLE JUSTIC E DHIRENDRA MISHRA Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocai for the appiicant. Mr. Pankaj Shrivasiava, Pan l Lawyer forfhe Siate. Heard. This petition has been pr ferred under Section 432 of Cr.P.C. for restoration of Cn'. Revision No.441 07, which was dismissed by this Cour! on 3.9.2097 on the ground that ihe cri inal revision was preferred with a delay of 64 days. However, when the matt was cailed none appeared forthe applicant and accordingly, the application for ondonation of delay was dismissed for want of prosecution and consequentlyt e revision was also dismissed as barred by limitation. This application has also be n preferred with a detay ot 107 days and the reasons assigned for the above de ay is that it is hecause ef some unavoidabte circumstances and no specitic reas n has been assigned. tn View of the above, the a plication for condonation of delay is rejected so stands dismissed, as the same is also Sd/- ' DHmENDRA MISHRA“ Judge ’ l and consequently, the petition is without any sufficient cause. W m a 200 Wm (WW) mama; l 3211mm E‘E‘Etmm mmivwm $ai1=cmé11é$1 Applicant Camplainant (C.G.) Chhedi Sodi MaVar, Non-aQQlicants 1.Dujram afar, 8/0. @ 35 RIO Village Donasagar. aged ab ut years. Dism. (C.G.) P.S. Rat npur, B!!aspur cf Chhattisgarh, Thmugh: P.S. 2. The Si e cf (C.G.) Ratanpu , District Bilaspur 25.2.2008