IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19051 of 2010 1.NAGENDRA PANDEY 2.Smt. Kalawati Devi 3.Sambhu Pandey @ Shambhu Kumar Pandey 4.Subodh Kumar Pandey, all are residents of village Mairi Maksudpur, P.s. Bhagwanpur, Dist. Siwan ….Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR O.P. ----------- 3 14.7.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted for offences under sections 304 B/201/34 of the Indian penal Code. The petitioners are named in the F.I.R. as accused and they are alleged to have participated in committing the crime in question. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners no.1 and 2 are parents in-laws of the deceased and petitioners no. 3 and 4 are the younger brothers of the husband of the deceased and according to him primal role for committing the crime in question is against the husband and not against these petitioners. It is further submitted that subsequently the informant has filed a compromise petition and even during the course of investigation the independent witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not persuaded to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail. It is accordingly rejected. The petitioners must surrender in the court below in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008 within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such a petition for grant of regular bail is filed on behalf of the petitioner, the learned court below may take into - 2 - consideration all the materials available on record including the fact that a compromise petition has been filed by the informant. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman