IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1242/2011 Date of decision:23.2.2011. Narinder Pal Singh .............Petitioner v Mandeep Kaur ..............Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Ajay Singla,Advocate for the petitioner Jaswant Singh,J(Oral). Petitioner/husband is aggrieved against the order dated 20.11.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Mohali, whereby the respondent wife, who is bringing up two children aged 18 and 14 years born out of the wedlock of the parties, has been granted interim maintenance @ Rs.2500/- per month besides a sum of Rs.4000/- as litigation expenses. The only argument raised on behalf of the petitioner is that he is a daily wage driver and his monthly income is Rs.3000/- and as such the maintenance granted is on higher side. After hearing the learned counsel, I find no merit in the submission made by the learned counsel. It is not the case of the petitioner/husband that respondent has any source of income to maintain herself as well as two children. It is also not disputed that the petitioner is an able bodied man and working as Driver. The argument that he is earning Rs.3000/- per month only does not inspire any confidence as no documentary proof in support of the same has been placed before the Court. Further, I fully agree with the observation of the learned Additional District Judge that the petitioner has concealed his actual income. For the reasons stated above,finding no merit the present revision petition stands dismissed. 23.2.2011. (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge