IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2007 SMT. NIRMALA VITHAL POROB KAPADI AND 6 ORS., ... Applicants Versus M/S. DEMPO MINING CORPORATION LTD REPRESENTED BY MR. SUBHASH KARMALI AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advcoate with Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. M. S. Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. G. Kale, Advocate fro the respondent No.1. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE, J. Date:- 5th July, 2007 P.C. Heard all parties. The relief which is sought in this civil application is for the stay of the impugned Judgment and Decree. The second appeal has been already admitted. The Advocate for the applicant states that as far as the respondent No.1 is concerned, there is a lease deed granted in their favour and, therefore, though the Decree may be stayed in its totality, the statement may be recorded that the original plaintiffs will not interfere with the possession of the respondent No.1. In the circumstances, the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), subject to the aforesaid statement which is accepted. R. S. MOHITE, J. ssm.