IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of March, 2010 Urgency Application No. 994/2010 Ist Bail Application No. 1172 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Amit @ Kallu .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 199/2009, U/s 395, 397, 412 IPC, PS Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun. _______________________________________________________________ March 18, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. MA Khan, Brief Holder for the State. In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, urgency application is allowed. Heard on the bail application of the accused applicant. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and there is no evidence against him except the confession of the accused applicant in police custody. He further submitted that co-accused Gulzar and Salim have been granted bail by the order dated 3.10.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dehradun and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. He further submitted that no identification parade has been held till date and the applicant is in jail since 3.9.2009. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Amit @ Kallu be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 18.3.2010 PRABODH 2