IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10003 of 2009 1. Phool Mohammad 2. Shami Ahmad @ Md. Shami, both sons of Md. Nayeem, residents of village- Bhaoprasad, Police Station- Dumra, District- Sitamarhi Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.10580 of 2009 Md.Laddu, son of Phool Mohammad, resident of village Bhaoprasad, Police Station- Dumra, District Sitamarhi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 11.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the complainant. Petitioners in the two applications are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 365, 370, 374 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, which was initially registered as a complaint and thereafter referred to police for investigation. The police having investigated the case, submitted final form and did not recommend the petitioners for trial. Later, a protest petition was filed on the basis of which cognizance of the offences alleged has been taken and the petitioners have been summoned and are apprehending their arrest. Let the petitioners above named surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below and if it is true that the final form was filed in the case and petitioners were not recommended for trial, then they be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail 2 bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Shiv Kumar Jha, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/ 51/2008, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)