( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.363 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.363 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.363 OF 2007 Shakil Ahmed Sheikh @ Khota Shakeel @ Vicky @ Shoaib .. Petitioner. Versus Union of India & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.Ayyaz Khan for the Petitioner. Smt.Poornima H.Kantharia for respondent No.1. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for respondent No.2-State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 25th April, 2008. DATED : 25th April, 2008. DATED : 25th April, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr.Ayyaz Khan for the petitioner, Smt.Poornima Kantharia for respondent No.1 and Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for respondent No.2-State. 2. This petition was posted today for admission and I have extensively heard learned Advocate Mr.Ayyaz Khan for the petitioner and Smt.Kantharia appearing for respondent No.1. 3. At the end of arguments on both the sides, before I could take up the dictation of the judgement on merits of the matter, learned Advocate Mr.Ayyaz Khan submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this revision petition. In the wake of the submission of learned Advocate Mr.Ayyaz Khan, I am inclined to allow the request. Hence, the order :- ( 2 ) a) Revision is allowed to be withdrawn. b) The effect of this withdrawal would be the impugned order dated 27.7.2007 passed by the learned Special Judge for N.D.P.S., Greater Bombay stands confirmed as of today. c) No views are expressed on merits of the matter. 4. Application stands disposed off as withdrawn. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)