IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13300 of 2009 MAHADEO SAHAY VERMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 23.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was sharer of 4 and ½ decimals of land which he transferred. If mistake is committed from the office emanating others name as sharer, no case is made out for justifying petitioner’s arrest at the moment though the allegation is followed by a super added allegation of snatching the chain of the complainant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No. 933 of 2008, Trial no. 3081 of 2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sandeep Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI