vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7264 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7264 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7264 OF 2008 Godavari Daji Sankhe ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.V.A. Gangal for Petitioner Mr.R.M. Patne, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 Mr.S.G. Karandikar for Resp. No.4 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 8, 2008 DECEMBER 8, 2008 DECEMBER 8, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal on 24.6.2008. The Tribunal has confirmed the orders passed by the lower authorities and held that the petitioner has not been able to prove her tenancy. There are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal and the other lower authorities that no documentary evidence was produced by the petitioner indicating that she was in possession of the land in question that she was cultivating the land. In these circumstances, I see no reason to interfere with the order impugned in the petition. 2. Reliance is placed on a notice issued by the erstwhile landlord to submit that the erstwhile landlord : 2 : has recognised the petitioner as a tenant. This notice has been issued after the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and, therefore, is of no consequence. 3. Petition is rejected.