IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36103 of 2009 1. UMESH PASWAN S/O LATE WAKIL PASWAN VILL-SANHA, P.S- S.KAMAL, DISTT- BEGUSARAI AT PRESENT- BALLIA, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 2. MAJU DEVI W/O UMESH PASWAN VILL- SANHA, P.S- S. KAMAL, DISTT- BEGUSARAI AT PRESENT- BALLIA, P.S- BALLIA, DISTT- BEGUSARAI ------- PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 368, 366A AND 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are father and mother of Sujit Paswan who had allegedly kidnapped the victim girl. It is submitted that they had no role to play in the alleged kidnapping although according to them it is a case where the girl and boy have fallen in love and ran away. The parents objected and lodged an F.I.R. due to the fact that the marriage is an inter caste one. Be that as it may, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. S.Ali (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)