In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 03.01.2007 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAM and The Honourable Mr.Justice N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Petition No.34944 of 2006 V. Subramanian ..Petitioner ..vs.. 1. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Chennai 600 003. 3.The Commissioner of Police Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 4.Sri Rajasthani Jain Samaj Educational Trust rep. By Mr. Harish L. Metha, Managing Trustee, 62, Burkit road, T.Nagar Chennai 600 017. ..Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus as stated therein. For Petitioner : Mr. Srinivasan for M/s. Hari & Guru Assts. For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran for R1 Mr. L.N. Prakasam for R2 Mr. A. Arumugam for R3 Mr. R. Mohan for R4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM,J.) By consent of all the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first and second respondent to demolish the superstructure at 5/13, Thambiah Reddy Road Extension, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033, illegally and unauthorisedly put up by the 4th respondent and further direct the third respondent to render all assistance for carrying out the work of demolition of the above mentioned property. 3. In view of the order to be passed hereunder, it is unnecessary to refer the factual details as stated in the affidavit. It is brought to our notice that in rent control proceedings between the petitioner and the 4th respondent against the order dated 07.11.2006 in CRP.No.831 of 2006, on the file of this Court, the very same petitioner filed appeal to the Supreme Court in SLP.(Civil)No.20064 of 2006. By order dated 11.12.2006, the Hon'ble Supreme court, dismissed the said Special Leave Petition, and confirmed the order granting time to vacate the premises till 30th May, 2007. In view of the said order, we clarify that the respondents 1 and 2 are directed not to take any further action till 30.05.2007. After expiry of the said period, it is for the respondents 1 and 2 to proceed in accordance with law. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar kh To 1. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Chennai 600 003. 3. The Commissioner of Police Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 1 cc To Mr.L.N.Praghasam, Advocate, SR.565. 1 cc To M/s.Hari and Guru Associates, Advocate, SR.567. 1 cc To Mr.J.Ravindran, Advocate, SR.405. 1 cc To Mr.R.Mohan, Advocate, SR.350. Writ Petition No.34944/06 ASM(CO) RVL 10.01.2007 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/