IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 20489 of 2009(O) -------------------------- OS.430/1989 of PRL.M.C.KOZHIKODE-I .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ VAYALORAKANDY ALIKOYA ALIAS V.K.ALIKOYA, S/O. VAYALORAKANDY MAMEDKOYA, AGED 45 YEARS, NADUVATTAM AMSOM, NADUVATTAM DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. MR.K.M.FIROZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- KUNNATH MUHAMMED,S/O.KUNHIMARAKKARU, RESIDING AT NADUVATTAM AMSOM AND DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C).No.20489 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July 2009 ------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The petitioner is the judgment debtor in E.P 263/2000 in O.S 430/1989 before the Principal Munsiff Court, Kozhikode. In the above suit a decree for mandatory injunction was passed against the petitioner and in the execution taken thereof petitioner filed two applications contending that the decree holder had assigned the property to another person and as such he is incompetent to execute the decree. The grievance of the petitioner is that without considering his objections and dismissing those applications the execution court has ordered for implementing the decree of mandatory injunction. Though application had been filed by him to get copies of the order W.P.(C).No.20489 OF 2009 2 till date it is not furnished is the further grievance executed in the petition. 2. Having regard to the submissions made, I find no notice to the respondent is necessary and it is dispensed with. The court below is directed to issue copies of the order, if applied for, passed in the application of the petitioner ( E.A 294 & 295 of 2009)within a span of 10 days and to keep in abeyance further steps in execution of the decree for a period of three weeks and if no order is passed by any superior forum restricting the execution of the decree after expiry of three weeks as indicated above, the court shall proceed and take appropriate steps for the execution of the decree. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv