IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 10th day of June, 2010 2nd Bail Application No. 59 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Monu @ Chandra Prakash & Ors. .….Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 11/2010, U/s 392, 411, IPC, PS Jhabrera, District Haridwar. June 10, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the applicant sand Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. First bail application of the applicants was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 15.4.2010. Hence, the second bail application has been moved on their behalf. Learned Counsel for the applicants argued that co- accused Ravindra has been granted bail by Sessions Judge, Haridwar vide order dated 18.5.2010 and the present accused appellants are also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. He also submitted that applicants have got no previous criminal history and they are in jail since 7.2.2010 and the trial of the case is yet to start. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let the applicant Monu @ Chandra Prakash, Sonu and Satendra @ Kaka be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, by each of them to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 10.6.2010 PRABODH