1 113.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.113 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1765 OF 2002 Union of India ...Petitioner Versus Munshi Sha ...Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.114 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1775 OF 2002 Union of India ...Petitioner Versus G.K.Pandian ...Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.115 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1766 OF 2002 Union of India ...Petitioner Versus V.Balasubramaniam ...Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.116 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1771 OF 2002 Union of India ...Petitioner Versus M.Venkatesan ...Respondent ...... Mr.Saikumar Ramamurthy and Mr.Ramesh Ramamurthy for Respondents in support of Notices of Motion. Mr.Deepak Rai i/b Mr.Suresh Kumar for Petitioner. 2 113.11 CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- JULY 25, 2011. P.C. 1. Considering the present assignment, it is not possible to accede to the request of the applicants/respondents to fix date of hearing of the Writ Petitions. It is not possible to give precedence to these matters, as there are other older cases, including Supreme Court expedited matters pending on the file. In the circumstances, Notices of Motion are dismissed. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)