IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.858 of 2009 PRABHU MISTRI S/o Kedar Mistri resident of village Makhdumpur P.S. Kurtha Dist Arwal Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR Opp. Party ----------- For the petitioner: Mr Birendra Kumar For the opposite party: Mr Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 03 10.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is accused under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been named in the F.I.R. but the informant has not identified him rather he has been named on the basis of the statement given by one Ranjit Paswan who allegedly identified him during another incident for which no first information report has been lodged. Thus, according to the petitioner T.I. Parade was a must in this case which has not been done. Further contention is that nothing has been recovered from his possession. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in jail since 6.11.2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case the above named petitioner, Prabhu Mistri, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jahanabad in connection with Kurtha (Manikpur) P.S. Case no. 150 of 2008. shahid (Dr Ravi Ranjan, J)