1 S.B.Civil Second Appeal No.364/2007 Ratan Lal vs Madan Lal Date of order : 23.10.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sandeep Saruparia, for the appellant. Mr.Sajjan singh for the respondent. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. After going through the facts of the case and if the best case of the defendant-appellant is considered then according to the defendant-appellant he was tenant in the whole of the property including the Chabootari in question even then the appellant failed to justify his raising of construction over the Chabootari in the rented premises. In view of the above, I do not find any substantial questions of law are involved in this appeal. Hence, the appeal of the appellant is dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appellant will remove the structure from the said Chabootari but some time may be granted to make adjustment of putting his goods. The time is granted. The appellant if furnishes undertaking within a period of 15 days from today in the trial court that he will remove the entire structure, which 2 he has on or before 31st Dec., 2007 then the decree under challenge shall not be executed. In case the undertaking is not filed within a period of 15 days from today, the plaintiff will be free to execute the decree under challenge. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-