mgl $2§ii§i§£ $§§é€$%€ (D BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION I S) NO. W)? OF 2011 PETITIONER Ku. Nikita Panigrahi D / o Badrinarayan Panigrahi, aged about 27 years, A.N.M., Sub—Health Center, Paraskol, Community Health Center, Saraipali, District — Mahasamund (c.G.) VERSUS :— /1. State of Chhattisgarh through — The Secretary, Health Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). Officer, The Chief Medical Mahasamund, District— Mahasamund (C.G.)i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMDTANCES OF THE CASE. W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1097 of 2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri S.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 07 day of March, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l), the petitioner, working as Assistant Nursing Midwife, at Sub Health Centre, Paraskol, Community Health Centre Saraipali, Mahasamund, has been transferred to Sub Health Centre, Kukurada, Community Health Centre, Loing, District Raigarh. However, the petitioner has not yet been relieved to join the new place of posting. Shri Tiwari submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, it is for the government to ensure that it is complied with immediately. She relies on a decision of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra 1 Ghosh v. State ofAssam & others , in suppOrt of his contention that if the order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcement thereof. 2. Shri Bhaduri, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondents submits that that if the transfer order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l) is still in existence and has not been complied with, appropriate steps would be taken to comply with the order. 3. If the aforesaid transfer order is still in existence, the govemment is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. It is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith, within a period of two weeks. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit l (1996) 10 scc 567 PETITIONER : Ku. Nikita Panigrahi. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Another.