1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4722 OF 2009 Aniket s/o Manohar Adhane, minor, u/g of real mother ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr B.S. Shinde, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr N.N. Jadhav, AGP for respondent no.1; Mr A.R. Nikam, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd July, 2009 PER COURT : This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for revaluation of the papers of Mathematics in which the petitioner got four marks out of eighty marks.We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, who has urged before us that this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may direct the respondent Board for revaluation of the Mathematics papers. 2. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.R. Nikam, learned Counsel on behalf of respondent no.2. It is brought to our notice that there is no provisions in the Regulations about revaluation of the answer-sheets. Retotaling which was permissible was done in the case of the 2 petitioner. In the light of that, there is no merit in the petition and the petition is,therefore, summarily dismissed. No order as to costs. [ A.V. POTDAR, J. ] [ P.V.HARDAS, J.] amj/wp4722.09