IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2010 / 11TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20669 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- LINTU P.PANAKKAL, KUTHOOR HOUSE, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DEEPU THANKAN SMT.G.RANJITA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, M.J.D.HIGH SCHOOL, KUNNAMKULAM P.O., THRISSUR. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD. 3. ASHA P.VARGHESE, HSA, M.J.D.HIGH SCHOOL, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. 4. SUNITHA C.O., UPSA, M.J.D.HIGH SCHOOL, KUNNAMKULAM. R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. DILIP MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- WP (C) No. 20669 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T ........................... The petitioner's father Sri. Floarance. K.V. died in harness while working as HSA in the first respondent's School. Subsequently, the petitioner submitted an application to consider her claim for appointment in terms of Rule 51 B of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education Rules. The grievance of the petitioner is that without considering her claim under Rule 51 B, respondents 3 and 4 were appointed by the first respondent against the vacancies occurred in the school subsequent to the submission of application by the petitioner. 2. Raising grievances against the said actions on the part of the first respondent, the petitioner has approached the 2nd respondent by filing Exhibit P4 representation which 2 WP (C) No. 20669 of 2010 is dated as 20.03.2010. 3. In this circumstance, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised by the petitioner this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months, with notice to the petitioner and respondents 1,3 and 4. Approval of appointments of respondents 3 and 4 if made in the meanwhile, will be subject to the result of the decision on Exhibit P4. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE. rkc