IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2729 of 2007 MOST. RAMRATI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 23.6.2009 The petitioner has approached this Court in its contempt jurisdiction claiming wilful violation of the order dated 6.1.2004 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 1 of 2004. The stand of the opposite partyNo.2 is that all the retiral dues of the petitioner have already been paid in terms of the general directions issued by the aforesaid order and only the Group Insurance amount remains to be paid by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, for which necessary papers have already been submitted before it. In the above circumstances, no case for initiation of the contempt proceeding is made out. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to institute appropriate proceedings for her remaining grievances against the Municipal Corporation. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)