IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9239 of 2010 1. POONAM KUMARI W/O SRI UMESH KUMAR BHARATI R/O VILL.- RAGHUNATHPUR, NORTH, P.O.- RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S.- BHARGAMA, DISTT.- ARARIA 2. CHANDA DEVI W/O SRI BUTAN MAHTO R/O VILL.- RAGHUNATHPUR NORTH, P.O.- RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S.- BHARGAMA, DISTT.- ARARIA. …… PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ARARIA, DISTT.- ARARIA 3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER ARARIA, DISTT.- ARARIA 4. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER ARARIA, DISTT.- ARARIA 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER OF BLOCK BHARGAMA, P.S.- BARGAMA, DISTT.- ARARIA ……. RESPONDENTS ----------- FOR THE PETITIONERS : MR.RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH, SR.ADV. WITH MR.NAVJOT YESHU,ADV. FOR THE STATE : STANDING COUNSEL NO.21 ------------ 3. 11/02/2011 As the petitioners have not filed any revision against the order of the Collector, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to them to do the same. If such a revision is filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner, the same shall be considered, parties will be heard and thereafter it will be disposed of by a speaking order in accordance with law and within the time limit fixed in the guidelines for disposal of revisions before the Commissioner. In case, petitioners file an application 2 for interim order, the Commissioner shall pass necessary orders in accordance with law. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)