IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2010 / 23TH POUSHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1566 of 2009(S) ------------------------------------------------ (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 18/02/2009 IN WPC.NO.1507/2009) PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- BIJU GEORGE, S/O.LATE M.G.GEORGE, 42 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M G M TOURIST HOME, CHALAKUZHY JUNCTION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT PANCHAMI NALANDA GARDENS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. MR.ISSAC NINAN, MR.RAJESH KUMAR.T.K. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- MR.P.M.MUHAMMED SAGER, S/O.SAGER, ABOUT 48 YEARS, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, CORPORATION OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR. P.K.MANOJ KUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COC. No. 1566 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner alleges noncompliance with the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. In that judgment I directed the respondent to pass orders as directed in Ext.P3 produced in that writ petition. Admittedly an order has been passed by the Secretary of the Corporation pursuant to directions in Annexure A1 judgment. The aggrieved party challenged the same before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions and obtained Annexure A5 judgment setting aside that order and directing the Secretary to pass fresh orders. As such I do not think that the petitioner has made out a case for initiating proceeding in this contempt case. Accordingly the contempt case is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/