- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. jmi SUIT NO.67 OF 1990. M/s.Zorrik Silk Mills & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. vs. M/s. Orient Road Lines. ..Defendants. .... None for Plaintiffs. None for Defendants. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD MARCH, 2009 : 23RD MARCH, 2009 : 23RD MARCH, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The plaintiffs and their Advocates have been always absent despite notices being sent to them by the learned Advocate for the defendants as well by the Court. The notice dated 19th March 2009 issued by the Office to the plaintiff no.1 has been accepted by the plaintiff on 20th March 2009 and the notice issued to the Advocate for the plaintiffs is returned by the delivery peon with remarks " The said room has been found locked." The compliance report dated 23rd March 2009 is on record. 2. The Court Office has also served a notice dated 3rd March 2009 to the plaintiff no.2. Despite that, the plaintiff no.2 is also not present before the Court. - 2 - 3. In view thereof, it is clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit any further. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]