fii) IttTrIE_HICH_COmT OF JUDICMTtBE AT BILASPUR C.G. Writ PetiUon No. 22^6 /Q2 Under Article 226)^27 -bhe Constitu-fcion of India. PETITIOMER Dinesh kumar Tamrakar V-ERSUS A^ RESPONDENTS ^-y .^% t:^^ ^^^^ •"" ^'" (1) State of Chhattisgaih tlirough Collecror Raipur Dis-fc-fc, Raipur (C.G. (2) Chief Municiple Officer Gobra Na^apara Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ,^ (3) Naib Tahsildar Sub-Tal-isil- Gobra, Nawapara» Distte Raipur (4) S-baUon House Officer, Police staiion Gobra? Na^apara^ Distt<» Raipur C.G-.~ (5) R.B.Shanna, Ward No.15, Sheetlapara Gobra Nawapara, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETITION No. 2296 of2002 PETITIONER : Dinesh Kumai-Tamrakar. VERSUS RE8PONDENT8 : StateofChliattisgarh&Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB:Hon9bleShriSatishK.Agiuhotn,J. Present: Nonc for the petitioner. Shri Shashaiik Th^air, Panel La^yer for the State/respondent No. 1 to 4. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 06U1 day of October, 2010) The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuitig the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit Ainit