IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2008 IN STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO. 2022 OF 2007 MR. SIDDHARTH S. NAIK ... Applicant Versus SURYAJI NARAYAN AMONKAR AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. G. Kale, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 18th September, 2008 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel on behalf of the parties. Petitioner Suryakant Naik expired on 30-3-2007. By application dated 26-7-2007 the sons of the Petitioner wished to be brought on record and as there is delay of 29 days they filed an application dated 5-2-2008. The said delay has been explained in paras 4 and 5 of the application dated 5-2-2008. Ms. G. Kale, learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that she has already filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the said two sons of the Petitioner. Considering the cause shown, the delay is condoned. Both the applications are granted. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.