THE HON’BLE SRI JUTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.19572 of 2012 ORDER: The 1st respondent issued a tender notice dated 13-06-2012, inviting tenders for selection of agency to supply manpower in various offices in Khammam District. The petitioners and some other agencies submitted their tenders. However, the cases of the petitioners were not considered. They submit that the respondents did not consider their cases, on the ground that they did not have turn over of Rs.4 crores per year, though in the tender schedule, the required amount is Rs.2 crores, for at least two financial years, in a span of three years. The petitioners submit that they fulfilled the conditions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, and learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent. Since the controversy is in a narrow compass, this Court directed production of records. It is not in dispute that one of the conditions incorporated in the tender notice is, that an applicant must have turn over of Rs.2 crores, for two years, in a span of three years, between 2009 and 2012. In case the petitioners have adequate proof, to show that they had the stipulated turn over, non-consideration of their cases can certainly be found fault with. Even from a perusal of the documents presented by the petitioners, it is evident that in no financial year, the turn over was Rs.2 crores. Once it emerges that the petitioners did not fulfill the conditions, the action of the respondents in not considering their cases cannot be said to be illegal or arbitrary. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. The miscellaneous petition filed in this writ petition shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.28-08-2012 KO