1 42-1193-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY srj CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1193 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1477 OF 2010 Balu Ganpat Kale & Others .. Appellants Vs. Sunil K. Dhoka & Others .. Respondents. Mr. Sagar Kasar i/b. Shri S.K.Shinde, for Appellants. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. DATE : 7th JANUARY, 2011. P.C.: 1 The Appellants have challenged the order dated 3rd July, 2010 thereby granting temporary injunction in favour of the Respondent/Plaintiff. I have perused the order passed by the learned Trial Judge. The learned Trial Judge while granting the order of injunction has given cogent and sound reasons. The learned Judge 2 42-1193-10.sxw has held that in order to avoid further complications, it is necessary that the Defendants/Respondents be restrained from creating any third party interest. 2 The scope of order under order 43 rule 1(v) is very limited. Unless it is found that discretion exercised by the trial Court has been exercised in a perverse manner, it will not be permissible for this Court to interfere with the same. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. 3 The learned Trial Judge is directed to dispose off the suit in any event within one year from today. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)