^. (2) r^ SmgN'-Ber IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH • AT BILASFUR (C.G.) W. P. (S) No. ^K^.../2009 (Single Biehch Service Matter) PETITIONER ,& ^^^>- ^fo'-^V9-''' , <)^k^.l?'" cy" <iy RESFONDENTS ;*:. ^ 1. BERNARD TIGGA aged about 53 years S/o Late Shri J. Tigga Sub Divisional Officer Survey Sub Division Water Resources Baster (C.G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through : Principal Secretary Water Resources Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh Secretariat D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ENGINEER IN CHIEF Water Resources Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh Sihawa Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ y. (3) tf' 3. SHRI DHALSINGH TEMBHARE . aged about 55 years S/o Late Shri S.K.Tembhare In Charge Sub Divisional Officer Tribal Development Pilot Project Water Resources Sub Divisioh Sukma Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) FETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA J^-. ^VS-tXW-^XX..u—A-m.r!..-^^T^j3ixXI^XUC:rTLTTTQiXLCJ2_C. XI-HG—78 3^ "ifi<ii<'t<<, ®fl|y<i<o,fc«ni'y^<. ^,..M.^.do,..3ziZ/, 7 3n^iTRR? (Li<=if'i»<<t() •M^IW !<•<{•*> H^iT 3?1^T ^Rh? ¥^TW?WBaii^i SLE MR. P Mr. V.G. Tamaskar, couns' Mr. Shashank Thakur, ie^puriUt;iil-& ^u. i o; z.. Chalienae in the instant w 30.06.2009 (Annexure P-1) pass which the petitioner who is work Water Resources Sun/ey Sul transferred in t'ne same caDacltv Division Sukma on administrative] C.ontention of the counsei order imD'uqned it has not beer administrative sxigencv for tras aetltio.ner has been transferred tc| resDondent No. 3 is aireadv therefore the Detltioner cannot ioi| i havs heard counse! for transfer order the State authoritil reason In the transfer order aj exiaency for transferrina a particil a.round of the Detitioner i'.e- peti| '^N?pN •wrcfftf fe^ •^re?rc ^TaiRnsnt?! tor t"e petitioner. 'anai Lawver for the Stste/ I'it DStition is to the order dated led bv the respondent No- 1 bv Ina as Sub Divisional Off'cer at Division. Bastar has been lat TDPP VVater Resources Sub lai'ounci- :for tMe petitioner is that i" the mentioned ss to what vi/as the rlsferrina the petitioner and the a oiace which Is not vacanf and 'orkina on the said oost and there. ;he parties. Whiie passing the s are not i-eauired to assign the to what is the administrative lar oerson.So far as the secohd oner has been transVerred to a 1^1 I-HC—78 -TS[ -^ww^, y'nl'y'Ko, (a«rtiyy,< snt^iw ft-ii°B ''nian^iwRw / sii^i Tra?r (" ?^iw ^ofCT ai^i -2-- Dlace whlch is not vacant i^ concsrned, the order dated 19.6.2009 (Annexure-P-2) make Shri D.S. Tembhare was aiven 1 where the petitioner has been t! said that the place where the pl ^l^d-illl ^FFI^ff ^f t^^ •(I^R^I't. ^; ajfgiT antii Is it ctear that respondent No. 3 Ihe additional charoe of the post ransferred and thus it cannot be gtitioner has been transfes'red, is not vacant. The.Detltion bein.q v<1thoit substance is dismlssed at the motion staae itseff. -^-.—.. g^ Pritinker Diwaker Judge