1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6350 OF 2010 Mrs.Madhuri Nitin Nikam & Ors. .. Petitioners V/s Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents Dr.V.V.Tulzapurkar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.R.D.Soni i/by M/s.Ram & Co.for the petitioners. Mr.M.L.Patil for Respondent No.1. Ms.Aparna Vatkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 4th August, 2011. P.C.: 1. In the affidavit filed by the Assistant Director of Town Planning, it is stated that the inquiry into the question whether the building plan submitted by the petitioners is to be approved or not, along with other cases is pending before the State Government. 2. The learned AGP appearing on behalf of the State Government states that the inquiry which is pending before the State Government, which includes the plot of the petitioners and which is the subject matter of this petition, would be completed as expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of four 2 months from today and the decision thereon shall be communicated to the petitioners. 3. The statement made by learned AGP is accepted. In view of this statement, on the motion made by learned counsel for the petitioners, petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach again if necessary. 4. Petition is disposed of. All contentions available to both sides are kept open. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)