1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2562/2011 FIRST APPEAL NO.110/2009 INDERCHANDRA RUPKARAN GOLCHA ..VS.. HIGH TECH GOAT FARM INDIA & ORS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.C. Mehadia, advocate for appellant Shri R.G.Vaidya, advocate for respondent on.1 CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 28.09.2011. Heard. Mr. Mehadia, appears for the appellant. The contesting respondent no.1 / original plaintiff is represented by Mr. Vaidya, advocate. Counsel for the appellant submits that he has handed over the draft as per the terms and conditions to the counsel for the respondent no.1. Statement is accepted. The application for compromise decree has been signed by the appellant and all the respondents so also their respective counsel. I have gone through the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise decree. Counsel for both the sides make a joint statement that the terms and conditions have been agreed upon by the 2 parties to the dispute and that the parties are present before the court. In that view of the matter, after going through the terms and conditions, I am satisfied that the parties to the appeal should be allowed to enter into compromise on the terms and conditions set out in the Civil Application no.2562/2011. Hence the civil application is disposed of in terms of the prayer clause (a) & (b) of the civil application. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) of the civil application. The First Appeal No.110/2009 is disposed of in terms of compromise recorded above. No order as to costs. JUDGE SMP