( 1 ) wp9741.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9741 OF 2010 Dhanraj s/o. Narhar Deo .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Shri H.V. Tungar h/f. Shri C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Shri D.S. Bagul, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 29.03.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri H.V. Tungar h/f. Adv. Shri C.R. Deshpande for the petitioner, Shri D.R. Korde, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Adv. Shri D.S. Bagul for respondent No.3. The Revenue Recovery Certificate dated 30.06.2010 issued by respondent No.2 is impugned in the petition. Adv. Shri Bagul invited attention to para 9 of the R.R.C. to show that the defence raised by the petitioner has ( 2 ) wp9741.10 been looked into and found unbelievable. 2. Adv. Shri Tungar has placed reliance upon order dated 18th February, 2011, delivered by me in Writ Petition No. 9740 of 2010. Perusal of said order reveals that there R.R.C. was issued without recording any reasons and hence by following Division Bench’s judgment reported in Sundeep Polymers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2010 (6) All M R 550, same was quashed. 3. Here the petitioner filed written notes of arguments and the same are discussed in paragraph 9 and thereafter the R.R.C. has been issued and the R.R.C. is therefore not issued without recording evidence. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the reasons are required to be recorded separately is misconceived because the reasons are to support the decision of issuance of R.R.C. 4. The petitioner has shown his bonafides by depositing an amount of Rs. 2 lakhs with respondent No.3 – ( 3 ) wp9741.10 Bank. The petitioner has got remedy of filing Revision under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner, therefore, can approach that authority for his grievance. The authority can look into the deposit amount and give the petitioner credit therefor, if occasion to deposit 50% of the amount of R.R.C. arises. With that liberty to the petitioner, present petition is disposed of. No costs. 5. The authority shall consider the prayer for condonation of delay in accordance with law in the matter. [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] snk/2011/MAR11/wp9741.10