IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND TEN WRIT PETITION No.22094 of 2009 Between: G.Nagabhushanam. … Petitioner And Inspector General of Police, PCR Cell, CID, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home for R.1 to R.4. None for R.5. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct the Additional Director General of Police, CID, Hyderabad-respondent No.2 to conduct further investigation of Crime No.14 of 2008. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner both in the forenoon and again in the afternoon. I have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondents 1 to 4. In this Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that without proper investigation of Crime No.14 of 2008, registered against respondent No.5, respondent No.4 has filed a final report before the jurisdictional Magistrate, referring the case as false. His further grievance is that even the representation made by him to the Commissioner of Social Welfare Department did not yield proper result. A perusal of the record shows that on the petitioner’s representation, respondent No.2 caused a further enquiry conducted by deputing an officer of CID branch. After enquiry, he has addressed letter in C.No.1115/C18/CID/2008, dated 12-2-2009, to the Additional Secretary to Government (FAC) Social Welfare (POA) Department, wherein it is stated that during the enquiry it was revealed that the allegations of caste abuse etc., were not substantiated. In the face of the above material, the only remedy available for the petitioner is to file a protest petition, against the final report filed by the Police, before the jurisdictional Magistrate. Exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is not possible for this Court to render any findings on various allegations made by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the above mentioned remedy. ---------------------------------------- - C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:01-7-2010 MNR