1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.08.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.6939 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Angusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu State represented through its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 09. 2.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram Distirct, Ramanathapuram. 4.Jeyaseelan, The Inspector of Police, Nainar Koil Police Station, Nainar Koil Post, Pararmakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 5.Ganesan ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2011 and consequently, direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 16.05.2011 and award appropriate compensation to the petitioner as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.P.Arun Jayatram for R.5 No representation for R.4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.06.2011 and consequently, direct the respondents to register the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner's complaint dated 16.05.2011 and award appropriate compensation to the petitioner as may be fixed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.M.Saravanakumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.P.Arun Jayatram, learned Counsel for the fifth respondent. There is no representation on behalf of the fourth respondent. 3. By Consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.06.2011 on its own merit and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its own merit as per law. 5. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Secretary to Government, The Tamil Nadu State Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 09. 2.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram Distirct, Ramanathapuram. +1cc to Mr.P.Arun Jayatram, Advocate, SR.No.27270 +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.27601 rsb GH : 23.08.2011 : 2p/6c W.P.(MD)No.6939 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 10.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/