1 K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2468 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1561 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2466 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1625 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Ms. Kranti L.C. for Ms. Bhavana Mhatre for Applicants in both civil applications. Ms. V.M.Parkar for Respondents in both civil applications. CORAM : K.K.TATED,J. DATE : 03/05/2011. PC: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 Both the civil applications preferred by the original respondents-workers for allowing them to withdraw the amount deposited by respondent original petitioner in this court pursuant to the 2 order dated 3rd April, 2007 (Coram: A.P.Deshpande, J.). Subsequently, this Court (Coram: B.H.Marlapalle,J.) passed an order dated 17th December, 2007 directing the Registry of this court to invest the entire amount in fixed deposit with the nationalised bank. 3 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant-employee submits that respondent employer deposited the said amount in this court towards their back wages and therefore, they are entitled to withdraw the same. He further submits that the applicants are facing financial problem therefore, it is necessary in the interest of justice to allow them to withdraw the said amount. 4 On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent vehemently opposed the said application. He submits that both the writ petitions are pending before this court for final hearing. He further submits that after hearing both the sides, this court 3 passed an order on 17th December, 2007 directing the Registry to invest the said amount in fixed deposit. He submits that allowing this civil application amounts a review of the order passed by this court on 17th December, 2007. 5 I have gone through the reply filed by the respondent. One thing is clear that this court passed an order on 17th December, 2007 after hearing both the sides and directed Registry to invest the entire amount in fixed deposit with a nationalised bank. At that time this court has not granted any liberty to the applicant to move for withdrawal of the said amount. Therefore, it is not possible to allow the applicant to withdraw the said amount in view of the order passed by this court on 17th December, 2007. 6 Both the Civil Application are rejected. (K.K.TATED,J.)