IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 24365 of 2006 Between: M/s. Granules India Limited, paracetamol Division, Temple Road, Bonthapally Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District, repby Asst. General manager, K.M.P. Patnaiak ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Labour Government of A.P., T. Anjaiah Bhavan, RTC X Roads, hyderabad. 2 The Verification/Returning Officer cum Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Patancheru, at rAmachandra Puram Medak District. 3 Granules India Limited (Paracetamol Division) Employee Union (regd No. A/3184), Plot No. 85, Opp: S.V.K. Hospital Shapur Nagar,Hyderabad-55 rep by General Secretary 4 Granules India Limited (Paracetamol Division) Workers Union (regd.No. A/1443) C/o M/s. Granules India Limited, Temple Road, Bonthapalli Jinnaram mandal, Medak District rep by its General Secretary 5 Granules India Limited (Paracetamol Division) Panivarala Sangham Regd No. A-3865, C/o M/s. Granules Inida Limited, Temple Road, Bonthapalli, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District repby General Secretary. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent NO.2 in passing the ruling vide order No. A/469/2006 dated 16-10-2006 permitting the casuals for verification process and consequently fixing the verification/ Election on 27-11-2006 as arbitrary, illegal, Unjustified, abuse of power and process of law, unconstitutional and consequently set aside the said impugned letter No. A/469/2006 dated 16-10-2006 passed by the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.24365 of 2006 ORDER: Sri Peenakapani, Advocate, representing Sri M.Radha Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ 01.06.2009 VGB