IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.88 of 2011 RAM ISHWAR SAH @ RAMESHWAR SAH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05 19.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(1)(X) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. The accusation is of abusing the complainant and calling her by caste’s name and after undressing her accused persons taken her thumb impression on blank paper. The complainant has herself admitted that the accused Ram Ishwar Sah provided a forged document in respect of a piece of land belonged to the complainant by intoxicating the complainant’s husband and on protest the occurrence took place for which earlier the complaint was filed in 2003. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the occurrence is of 22.07.2007 whereas complaint was filed on 01.08.2007 and the complainant herself admits 2 the bonafide land dispute between the parties which clouds bonafide of accusation, let the petitioners, Ram Ishwar Sah @ Rameshwar sah, Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar sah, Akhilesh Kumar @ Rakto Sah, Shiv Kumar Sah @ Shiv Kumar @ Bhola Sah, Satrughan Sah, Kailash Sah, Sunita Devi and Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Sah, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 2101 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)