IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2892 of 2011 MD. EHSAN & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 130B, 420, 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the D. P. Act. It is alleged against the petitioners that for the sake of non- fulfillment of dowry demand, the marriage could not be finally settled. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that on the basis of accusation, no case under Sections 498A or 406 of the I.P.C. is made out. Moreover, there is no proof with regard to payment of any money to petitioners’ side. Considering the nature of accusation, let the petitioners, Md. Ehsan and Md. Sitab @ Santab be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 2 twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint Case No.308 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Benipur, District- Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)