THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.9154 OF 2010 Dated 22nd April, 2010 Between: Tharigopula Suryanarayana …Petitioner And The Indian Oil Corporation and 2 others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.V.Venkataramana, Senior Counsel for Mr.Balanaga Srinivas. Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: Mr.T.Srinivas, SC for IOC Counsel for respondent No.3: ----- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not properly evaluating the marks secured by the petitioner and respondent No.3 in accordance with the terms of the notification and the guidelines governing selection and appointment of the retail outlet dealers. I have heard Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, and Sri T.Srinivas, learned Counsel representing respondent Nos.1 and 2. The petitioner and respondent No.3 were applicants for retail outlet dealership in respect of Chinna Tekur Village, Kollur Mandal, Kurnool District. According to the petitioner, he was not awarded marks for the site offered by him. The petitioner is stated to have submitted representation, dated 29-03-2010, to respondent No.2 in this regard. The grievance of the petitioner is that no decision has been taken so far. The learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submitted that in view of existence of Grievance Redressal Committee, the petitioner’s representation will be forwarded to the said committee and that the Corporation will act on the decision of the Committee. In view of this submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to refer the petitioner’s complaint to the Grievance Redressal Committee and consider the decision of the Committee before taking further action with respect to appointment of retail outlet dealer of Chinna Tekur Village, Kollur Mandal, Kurnool District. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.11832 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 22nd April, 2010 lur