IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2516 of 2011 KAPILDEO SINGH @ SANJU @ SANJU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.3.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and it appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation co-accused Sanjay Yadav disclosed that this petitioner was using the stolen SIM and thereafter petitioner was arrested and confessed his guilt leading to recovery of the aforesaid stolen mobile. It has specifically been asserted in paragraph 12 of the petition that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. So, even if, it assumed that the stolen mobile was recovered on the basis of disclosure made by this petitioner, then also, only section 412 of I.P.C. is applicable against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Kapildeo Singh @ Sanju @ Sanju Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram, in Nokha P.S. Case No.134 of 2010. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that at paragraph 13 of this application in place of 26.7.2010 it has wrongly been typed as 26.7.2007. Learned counsel is permitted to make necessary correction in course of the day in the above stated paragraph of the application. Anilkr.sinha (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)