IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2010 / 16TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21047 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SRI.C.SURENDRAN PILLAI, OVERSEER GRADE I, OFFICE OF THE ASST.ENGINEER, P.W.D.BRIDGES SECTION, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR, DRAFTSMAN GRADE I, OFFICE OF THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BRIDGES SUB DIVISION, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION), PUBLIC WORKS DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21047 OF 2010 (E) ===================== Dated this the 7th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought in the writ petition is for a consideration of Exts.P8 and P9 representations made by the petitioners before the 2nd respondent. Petitioners are working as Overseer Grade I and Draftsman Grade I under the 2nd respondent. They complain of anomaly consequent upon the revision of pay upon the grant of third time bound higher grade. It is in this context, they have filed Exts.P8 and P9 before the 2nd respondent. 2. Having regard to the pendency of Exts.P8 and P9, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall consider the representations with notice to the petitioners and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three months of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp