1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2587 OF 2009 (Mangal Vs. The Police Inspector, Ausa) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. K.A.Kadam, Adv. for the applicant. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP for the respondent/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:6/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Pre-arrest bail is sought in Crime No.77/2009, registered at Ausa Police Station for the offence under Section 302, 498-A, 323, 504 read with 34 of IPC. 2. The Counsel canvassed, the applicant no.2 is sister of husband and is given in marriage and, residing at Pune. She has delivered a child in March, 2009 and hence has no role in the matter. The allegations in the FIR, according to Counsel, are of general nature, and will not constitute any offence against the applicants herein. 2 3. The contention at this stage cannot be accepted. The case of electrocution as was accelerated was found to be a drama as the deceased had head injuries which were pretended by the accused/applicant Bhagyashri to be sustained due to fall suffered owing to electric shock. The weapon by which she was assaulted is allegedly seized. In the situation, no case for pre-arrest bail. It is rejected. Application is rejected. The observations made are prima facie in nature. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2587-09crapl