1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.32 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.446 OF 2008 Ukkuda Vilasini Ratnakar ..Applicant V/s Mukund Krishna Patil Deshmukh & ors ..Respondents Mr.N.R.Bubna, Advocate, for the applicant Mr.Siddharth Range i/b.Ms.Manjiri S. Parasnis, Advocate, for the respondent No.2 Mr.A.I.I.Patel, AGP, for the respondent No.4 CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2009 P.C. . By the above Civil Application, the applicant prays for restoration of the above Contempt Petition which has been dismissed for non-prosecution on account of the conditional order dated 6th January, 2009. By the said order, the petitioner was to effect service on the concerned respondent and file affidavit of service, failing which the Contempt Petition was to stand dismissed for non-prosecution. 2 The learned counsel for the applicant states that the service has been effected but affidavit of service was been filed belated as the learned counsel was not aware of the conditional order. In my view, case for restoration is made out. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Resultantly, Contempt Petition is restored to file. List the Contempt Petition on 8th April, 2009. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)