IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 23943 of 2008 Between: Sudhir Sanghi S/o. Late Ram Saran Sanghi R/o. 4-3-352, Bank Street, Koti, Hyderabad, A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Addl. Director General of Police,(Intelligence) Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. 5 The Commissioner of Police Commissionerate, Hyderabad City, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus and declare the in action of the Respondents in not Providing security by appointing gun men in spite of Several representation made by the petitioner as there was serious life threat to this life as well as to his property as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violation of Article 19 and 300-A of Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 23943 of 2008 O R D E R : This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents in providing security to him by providing gun men is arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner sates that he made representations dated 25-08-2008, 02-10-2008 and 10-10-2008 bringing to the notice of the respondents that there is a serious threat to his life as well as to his property and therefore requesting to provide security. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents and since the petitioner’s representations are pending, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 04-11-2008 KLP