IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1860 of 2007 1. MIRTUNJAY SINGH, son of Shiv Mangal Singh, resident of village Kagidaulatpur, P.S. Belaganj, distt. Gaya. 2. Jaymanti Kumari wife of Ajay Kumar, resident of village Japhra, P.S. Belaganj, Dist. Gaya. 3. Pratima Kumari, wife of Ramesh Prasad, resident of village Panari P.S. Belaganj, Dist. Gaya. 4. Sushma Kumari, wife of Ashwani Kumari, resident of village Panari, P.S. Belaganj, Distt. Gaya. 5. Awadh Kumar Paswan, son of Ram Brikh Paswan, resident of village Panari, P.S. Belaganj, Dist. Gaya. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate, Gaya. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya. 4. The Block Development Officer, Belaganj, Gaya. 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Belaganj, Gaya. 6. The Mukhiya Panari Gram Panchayat, Belaganj, Gaya. 7. The Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Panari, Belaganj, Gaya. 8. Sanjeet Kumar, son of Sri Sidheshwar Prasad resident of village Bhagwanpur, P.S. Belaganj, Dist.Gaya. 9. Sabiya Khatoon D/O Mahfuj Ansari, resident of village Jafar, P.S. Belaganj, distt. Gaya. 10. Upendra Prasad Sinha, son of Ram Chandra Prasad r/o vill. Hament Bigh, P.S. Belaganj, Distt. Gaya. 11. Moti Prasad son of Babu Ram Prasad, R/o vill. Panari, P.S. Belaganj, distt. Gaya. 12. Babar Ansari, son of Sultan Ahmad r/o vill. Jafar, P.s. Belaganj, Distt. Gaya. 13. Ranjeet Kumar Chaudhary, son of Arjun Chaudhary, r/o vill. Nankhu Bigha, P.S. Belaganj, Distt. Gaya. 14. Rakesh Kumar, son of Musafir Singh, r/o village Panari, P.S. Belaganj, distt. Gaya. ----------- 2 1.9.2010 Having heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State as with regard to the following relief of the petitioners in this writ application, “That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ (s) direction (s), order (s), directing the respondent authorities to consider and appoint the petitioners on the post of Siksha Mitra at Gram Panchayat Panari, Belaganj, Gaya.” this Court is satisfied that now after abolition of the post of Panchayat Siksha Mitra w.e.f. 1.7.2006 there would be no 2 prospect for the petitioners to be appointed on the post of Siksha Mitra, inasmuch as, after 1.7.2006 such post has already been abolished. Counsel for the State, in fact, also informs that the sole plan of the petitioner for getting appointment on the post of Panchayat Siksha Mitra being based upon the illegality in the appointment of respondent nos. 8 to 14 would also not available to them as such appointment has already been cancelled. In that view of the matter, the relief prayed for in this writ application has become infructuous and the same is dismissed accordingly. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)