.:':<<".'rs?a?';^"%3®'s-'SB~s~^ssgiG.'?'S'.'-?^S^S8'iBE^I?' i. 1 ;1 A ' \'~" [^y^ <^<gy ^.a^x ^^ ^ ?^\A^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.') WMTPETITION N0-^^9-7 /2006 Petitioner </ Ranmafh Vishwakarma aged 60 years, S/o Sahdev Vishwakarma, Occupation - Shock up Machamc near Pawaa TaUdes, Railway Crossing, Korba r/o Durpa Road Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents ^ 1. StateofChhattisgarhthrough secretoTy Home Afairs D.K.S. Bhawan, ^ Raipur(C.G.) .•••''/^' • 2. Suprintendent ofPolice, Janjgir, ^.^"y^ Distt.-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) / 3. Suprintendent ofPolice,Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) , 4. StationHouse Officer, Police station Kusmunda, District Korba (C.G.) 5. Station House OfBcer, Police station Akaltara, Distt.-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6. Public Healfh Center, Baloda through3.M.O. PHC, Baloda Disfaict Janjgir Champa, (C.G.) 7. Mahendra Singh Tomar, S.P. Korba, at present posted at 32 Batallian, Satai, Bilaspur (C.G.) 8. Amit Kumar, S.P. Distt.-Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) 9. K.S. Thahir T.1., P.S.-Kusmuada, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) 10. Dhaimu Yadav, I/c.- O.P. Baloda, P.S.-AkaItara, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) c^^ <&0°B' \^ - / ****' ^yy ^•" x' >''-^v'"^^^ WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. XI-HC-78 *TT(T^TT aiflfT^i 'SSf •^l^ld'M, tfiTTlu'IS, RldKHy .ry^:.-c.:..?..^.^:^. W?[ 200C, W^\ 4st* ('icl^<s«<<T) 3t^Rr^iTl<-fi4) gs(T3lls:ilst>Hl<f 5?aTW:<rf?tT3n^T »bi'i|F<-i'>fl-ft<i*<i'i1'ffFs'<3 <Ri^i< ^isiRriTsn^r 19.2.2007 Shri Abhijeet Sarkar, colinsel SfariU.N.S.Deo,G.A.fo^ for fhc petitioner. the State/respondents. Heaid on I.A.No. 8640/ to delete the name of 2006, appUcatkin for permissiou No. 8 fiTOin thc array of respo^ident respondents. Learaed counsel for fl|ie State/respondents does aot oppose the above applicatiou. The appUcation R.A.No. respoadeat No. 8 be deleted Also heard on I.A.No. 9 the petitioner for issuaace I.A.NO. 10108/06, additional| appUcatioa for issuance ofdire|< Learaed counsel for subsequent to filing of th^ authorities are harassing nienibers wifh a purpose to] petition. Detefls of the of4ircctk>ns 8640/06} is allowed. Name of fi^in the array ofrespondents. )^65/06, appUcation on behalf of to fhe respondents aad subiaussion in respect of the ire|ctions to the rcspondents. the petitmaer STibnuts that iastaat petition, the poUce tjie petitioner and his feunily coiupel hiia to wifhdraw fhls h^rassinent havc been providri^ XI-HC-78 wisnissh+iicft ?.iFnri"iti<<)'3l»l!,i»Tfitl*l»a,.-fB|<?fiy^< •i ****** *i* **»***» *''feX'*-;f'';<F^ ^" .r-3H-,: ff iStli^i'll-ysicK (lj":'^d<!*!i?') 3n^T?)T.4^:tW,I (raTsn^raiiii?; 1 7^"K BlSiTS SSHITWV^S 311^ <t)|i|fc1<Tl-1 HTtlcTr' tf te^f <J3RZK:; ^a nSK7 vs^^3f^^3^^\^mrs T!- subsequenfly Uy way of ^dditional submission. It is alleged that somewhere ia the ifaonth of Jiine 2TO6 Shri Himanshu Gupta, Superintendent of[PoIice, Korba, C.S.P. KoAa, Sirmaur, Shri R.K. Sahu, C.S.P., pam, Shri Surjit KmBar, S.P. Korba aad otfaer staff meiabers| came to the house o^ the petitioner aad threatenfidj him and ^ite family members in fhe presence of some other peraons. Ttus aU^ations hjas been vehemently dcniMl by fhe respondents fhrough the|ir repfy dated 15.12.2006, which is supported by jan affidav|it of Shri M.D. Khal&o, S.D.O. (P), Katghora, Distt- Korba. |As per the aUegations ia thc petition, the incident occurred so^aewhere in the inon.th of Jiiae 2006, however, the specifics rej ;arding the coinplaiat divu^ed iu fhe laonfh of October, 2006 ji.e. aflber about four inonfhs. Though fhere are certaia refer^nce ia fhe petition regardiug the coinplaint lodged by the ^etitioner ^ainst thc above acts ofthe respondents, no copy oft^ie said coxnplaint has been fllal along with fhe petition. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 +II*ICTI awr^i 3:°5T "!<i<iid<i, tjiTnu'is, Ridi^y . ->^ f- 2.^^°) y ,-3 ^T 200 & W^\ W<h ('iq^^ff) an^T^Tf?TO? tiqTan^rgaiN) STararcflfN'-w^T +i'iilci'ifl-f xi>iCTTffte^)'<Ri<^i< ^sri^q'an^r Leamed counsel for t4e petitioner fairly submite that by fhe respondents. couascl for the respondcnts that the officera iiamed in leadned now he is not beiag threatene^ On the other hand, denies the aUegattons and su^mits fhis pctition have taken cha]i^e Korba after the iaddent of defcfh 18.2.2004, fherefore, there is| respondents to mdulge iuto fh^ Be that as it siay, takinj the petitioner coucedes that the above appUcation {I.A.NO. The respondents have \ petition aad rejoinder filed by Froin perusal of fhe subsequent to dismissal of th^ 2124/2004, the poUce has fhe process, they Iiave inade] cause of deafh of the ;ha]i^e of th.eir respectwc posts at of son of the petitioaer dated no occasiou for the answering acte alleged. in.to consideration the fact that jjusv he is not beiag threatened, ^665/06} stands disposed of. a|lso fifcd additional retura to IIie ^he petitioner. al4itional retum it is observcd that earlier writ petition bearuag No. na^de further investigation and in siacere efforts to ascertam the peti.tio^er's sou and for ttus piirpose a r.i.u. XI-HC-78 *11*1CTI SbHlth 3^? •<ll'i<ld'M, tiiTflu'IS, Rx-IK-iy . r^-.(^...^~.s.?.9, ^ TP=[ 200 G 311^1 4s|* (li°l(^°tS,<T) an^TqiT^iR; craTSn^Tstilit) ^RIRRflfN'Sn^T !<iwffi41-f t<i4d1'ffts'<3 <Ri<-ii< ^sri^FTSTT^T quisi1|ioned detailed report was re< Forensic Medicine, Pt. J.N.M^ Hospitel, Ralpur. Froin perus|al it appears that the forensic categorical opinion legarding Leamed counsel for th^ flnia the Dcpartmait of Medical College aad Ambedkar ofthis report dated 19.10.2004 are not in a position to give teuse ofdeafh ofttie deceased. es^perts invest^ation is stiU goiug endeavours to ascertain the Otl c^iuse respondents subtnits that Meig aad fhe poUce is maldng aU ofdeath ofthe deccased a&d petitfoner, to coUect any iucmnmatmg light upon the cucimistancei Vtehwakarma, sou offtie Taking into consideratii|>n the respoudents and furthe| 19,10.2004 ofDr. R.K. SinghJ Forensic Medicine & ^vidence which may throw same iinder wtuch deceased Kaflash Toxic]3logy Raipur, ttus Court is of fhe of tfae petitioner for registratu|)n connection wittt the suspicioi(is itfoner, died. the additk>nal retum. filed by ic^ considering the report dated Professor aad Head of Deptt Of ', J.N.M. Medical CoUegp, c^nsidered opinion that fhe prayer of Pirst Informatk>u Rcport in death of son of the petttioner^ PJ.O. XI-HC-78 an^TqiTRi^R; (ISIT3IR?Tsb*11cti v <> ^ \..v- \ ^//^ "< *II*IWI Sb*1icft 3%T -<<l<<ld<<, ?!>Tn<1'16, Rldiuy . 'K>. ^- 2-S-^^' A^ ^[ 200 6 W^\ 4^<h (tcl!^ct<^iT) ^<lRK?rf?tT3n^T namely Kailash Vishwakara|ia, cannot be acceded to at fhis jon is disinissed stage. Accordingly, fhe petit( Consequeuffy, I.A.No.| tura hearing stands dispose^ +i*it^41-f ^it<ctTffFs'<fl <Ri<^i< ^>3lf^q'3I1^T 8886/06 appUcation fbr out of of. Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishra Judge P.T.O.