BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NOE éé 9’ /2006 T (52% PETITIONER Thakur Jawahar Singh, O(gr$ééiié3j,.w wr‘ S/o.Shri about 56 Moti years, Singh, Working Aged as ¢\\"\‘“ |' a...“ Assistant Teacher in wt: Government Primary School, Mulmula, Development Block Pamgarh, Janjgir, District ‘l ge” 0?; Eswa Janjgir—Champa (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS K 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.). The Principal, Government Primary School, Mulmula, Development Block Pamgarh, Janjgir, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) ,4. The Collector, District Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS,ORDER/ ORDERS,DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF' WRITS‘ OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. x XI-HC—78 mPo i4 bé 9/;1 ,9 WW ................¢.. a1 200 ////’W ’V/ l Q§ a$wan&#$ 'anéwm (W) $mww?mm%%%¢h%gx $ma m$w$ aEm£a%aa&$ %3 %na§m 31-8-2006 Mr. Ashok Soni, counse! for 1h: pe‘l'ifioner. Mr. Safish Gupfa, Depufy Govt. Advocafe for ‘rhe Sfde/respondenfs, on advance copy‘ Pkwd The only grievance raise: by ‘the pei'i‘rioner in This wri‘r pe‘rH-ion under Arficle 226/227 of The Consfi‘rufion of India is tha‘r as per The Rmionaliza‘rion Scheme, 2006 in case of surpl fecchers in any school, fhen only fhe junior mosf teacher-s are To be include in fhe surpius iisf and to be Transferred as scheme. The There per scheme. Whereas, in p senT case, There are many junior Teachers To The peTiTioner, buT Their names ave noT been included in The lisT and The name of The peTiTioner has been includ d in conTravenTion of The scheme. The peTiTioner has The r medy To file an appeal before The appellaTe auThoriTy as per clause-7 of v e roTionalizaTion scheme and The appellaTe auThoriTy is bound To consider T e; grievance of The peTiTioner, if The some is v X found correcT according To The s heme, and To correcT The some. Since The has efficacious alTernaTive Q.\ \ peTiTioner e ually remedy available, Therefore, he should prefer an peal before The appellaTe auThoriTy and The“ k auThoriTy To consider The poinTs aised by The peTiTioner. The Time Taken by The p TiTioner in filing This peTiTion Till iTs disposal shall be condoned in preferring T e appeal before The appellaTe auThoriTy. WiTh The direcTion afores id, The peTiTion sTands disposed of. ConsequenTly, M.(W.)P.No. 604/2006 also sTands disposed of. l Cer'l'ified copy as per rule . l Sd/- % L.C. Bhadoo l Judge