IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 69 OF 2003 & 68 OF 2005 IN L.P.A. St. No. 7478 of 2005 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1940 OF 1995 PETITION NO. 1940 OF 1995 PETITION NO. 1940 OF 1995 Chief Executive Officer, Z.P. Nashik ...Petitioner versus Smt. Tarabai Gulab Sawant & anr. ..... Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada ) Court‘s or Judge‘s Orders or directions and ) Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Umesh Mankapure with R.V.More for the petitioner. None for the respondent. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & D.B. D.B. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 19TH SEPT., 2005 19TH SEPT., 2005 19TH SEPT., 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The reasons stated for condoning the delay are grossly inadequate. The appellant is the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nashik. It cannot be said that he was not aware of the various remedies available and the requirement of pursuing the remedies within the time prescribed. Hence we refuse to condone the delay. As the consequence of this, the LPA is also dismissed. C.A. accordingly disposed of. *****