Civil Revision No. 44 of 2009 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 44 of 2009 (O&M) Karamjeet Kaur ..... Petitioner vs Jaspal Singh ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. H. S. Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P. K. S. Phoolka, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 8.12.2008 passed by the learned lower Appellate Court whereby in an application for interim stay, during the pendency of the appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial court in a suit for specific performance, it had stayed the operation of the judgment and decree only regarding joint possession and did not stay the execution of the sale-deed. In the execution filed by the respondent-plaintiff, vide order dated 17.1.2009 the learned Executing court had appointed a local commissioner to get the sale deed executed in his favour. This court on 16.1.2009 had stayed the execution of the sale-deed. Once the learned Lower Appellate Court has stayed the operation of the judgment and decree impugned before it regarding joint possession, it would practically be a futile exercise in case the execution of the sale-deed is not stayed, during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, I deem it appropriate to make absolute the order dated 16.1.2009 passed by this court. Ordered accordingly. As a result thereof, the impugned order dated 17.12.2008 passed by the Executing Court shall be kept in abeyance and the proceedings shall revive immediately after the decision of the learned Lower Appellate Court. The learned court below where the appeal is pending against the judgment and decree of the trial court shall dispose of the same expeditiously. The revision stands disposed of in the above terms. 5.3.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge