1 cam-75-10 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2009 Prakashbhai Kandubhai Patel .. Applicant Vs. Rakshaben Prakashbhai Patel .. Respondent Mr. Sandesh D. Patil for applicant. Mr. Sanjay S. Barde for respondent. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. March 11, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the grounds set out in this application for review/modification of our earlier order dated 5/5/2009. 2. As of now, the applicant is paying an amount of Rs.4500/- per month to the respondent, pending FCA No. 29 of 2009, which he has been 2 cam-75-10 filed against the decree passed by the Family Court. Even if the applicant would provide a residential accommodation to the respondent, he would be required to pay an amount of Rs.2000/- per month to her. Admittedly, the type of houses he located to take on rent and provide to the respondent for her residence, his financial liability would be about Rs.2500/- per month in that regard. For some or the other reasons, if the respondent continues to stay with her father, the applicant is required to pay Rs.4500/- per month during the pendency of his appeal. We, therefore, do not find any case to reduce the amount of Rs.4500/- and there is no case made out to entertain this application. 3. The application is rejected. However, the applicant is at liberty to apply for fixing an early date of hearing in his appeal. (S. J. VAZIFDAR,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)