IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-31309 of 2009 Date of Decision: 22.02.2010 Manohar Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. S.S. Katnoria, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. ` Mr. M.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate for the respondent-complainant. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties have jointly stated that the matter has been compromised and in pursuance to the said compromise, a divorce petition under Section 13-A of the Hindu Marriage Act has since been converted into Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and the statement to that effect has also been recorded. Learned counsel for the respondent-complainant has no objection, if the present petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In view of the above compromise, the petition is allowed and the Order dated 13.11.2009 passed by this Court is, hereby, made absolute. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 22.02.2010 JUDGE gurpreet