IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 8645 of 2004 Between: 1 M/S Gangothri Purified water Wyra Road, Khamman rep.by its Proprietor Ms. Hemamalini Vedantham D/o Lakshmana Chary, [aged 30 R/o Gandhi Chowk, Khamman 2 M/S Surya Purified Drinking Water Pumping Well Road, H.No.3-6-94, Khamman , rep.by its Proprietor , K.Pandu S/o Lingaiah, aged 34 yrs, R/o Khammam ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Union of India rep.by its Joint Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi 2 The Director , Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi 3 The Director Institute of Preventive Medicine, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and call for the records relating to the notification of the 1st respondents herein bearing No. GSR 760(E) Dt. 29/09/2000 with respect to the insertion of Sub- Rule (28) to Rule49 of Prevention of Food & Adulteration Amendment (Rules) 2000 and quash the same Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.K.V.R.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: MR.ARAJASHEKAR REDDY (SC FOR CG) The Court made the following: Oral order:- There being no representation on behalf of the petitioners, when the writ petition was listed on 27-12-2004, this court directed to post the writ petition under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on this day. Earlier too, on 21-06-2004, the writ petition was dismissed for ‘non-prosecution’ and thereafter it was restored on an application made for restoration of the writ petition in W.P.M.P.No. 14200 of 2004 by order of this court dated 04-08-2004. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, when the writ petition is listed for ‘dismissal’ today. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for ‘default’. No costs. ________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Pvks/* To 1. The Joint Secretary, the Union of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi 2. The Director , Bureau of India Standards, Manak Bhavan 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg. New Delhi 3. The Director Institute of Preventive Medicine, Narayanaguda, Hyd 4. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR}