IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-5726 of 2009 Date of decision : 2.3.2009. ... Kesar Singh ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Mohd. Salim, Advocate for the petitioner. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although representation Annexure P-5 was submitted to the SSP, Sangrur, regarding the grievances ventilated in the petition, but the same has not been decided till today. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied in case SSP, Sangrur is directed to decide his representation Annexure P-5 within a reasonable period. So, in these circumstances, SSP, Sangrur, is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-5 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petition stands disposed of. ( K.C. Puri ) 2.3.2009. Judge chug