Civil Revision No. 3021 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3021 of 2010 Date of decision : 7.5.2010 Jatinder Singh Grewal ....Petitioner Versus Parminder Singh ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. S. D. ANAND, J. The relevant ejectment petition, on an averment of personal necessity, was filed on 30.8.2007. It is presently fixed for 25.5.2010 for the evidence of the petitioner. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that the petitioner would be content and interests of justice would be served if a time-bound disposal of the petition under reference is ordered by this Court. The petition is disposed of in limine with a direction that the learned Rent Controller shall dispose of the main petition itself within six months from 25.5.2010. Learned Trial Court shall ensure that both the parties would get an equal number of opportunities to project their stances before it. The disposal of this petition in limine, with a view to expedite the disposal of the proceedings, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on Civil Revision No. 3021 of 2010 -2- **** behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. Disposed of accordingly. May 07, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Civil Revision No. 3021 of 2010 -3- ****