1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4611 OF 2009 Abhishek Ashok Saboo ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Girish Kulkarni and Mr.Kapil Dave for the Applicant. Mr.Pasbola i/b. Mr.Rahul Arote for the Original Complainant. Mrs.S.D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 9, 2009 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant, Counsel for the complainant and APP for the State. 2 The applicant apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.64/2007 registered by MIDC Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 408, 420 read with 34 of the 2 IPC and it is subsequently transferred to EOW, Unit III, CID, Mumbai. 3 It is alleged that the applicant has made false entry in the SAP system and has misused the security cheques given by the JP Electronics to the complainant and thereby crated records which are alleged to be false and as a result, loss is caused to the complainant company to the tune of Rs.96 lakhs. 4 Counsel for the applicant submitted that right from 2007, the applicant has been attending police station and has attended almost on 200 occasions. He submitted that no case is made out by the complainant in respect of the alleged cheating and other offence mentioned in the said complaint. It is submitted that the applicant is merely working in the said department and is not concerned with the internal functioning of the complainant. It is further submitted that the said complaint had been 3 filed as counter blast since the company could not get any interim orders in the suit which has been filed by the company against JP Electronics. 5 Counsel for the complainant has invited my attention to the affidavit in reply filed by the company in which various details have been given pertaining to the said alleged misappropriation by the present applicant and fabrication of accounts. 6 Taking into consideration the nature of allegations which are mentioned in the complaint and the matter which is on record, in my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7 Application is rejected. (V.M. KANADE, J.)