IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12696 of 2009 SANJAY SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 18-8-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is allegation in the F.I.R. against this petitioner that as an agent of Life Insurance Corporation he regularly collected six monthly premium from the informant who is a lady and much later after few years the informant came to know that those premiums were not deposited by the petitioner. The defence of the petitioner was that the allegations are absolutely false. On 18th May,2009 this court issued notice to the informant who was directed to be added as opposite party no.2 and granted provisional anticipatory bail. Now it transpires that peremptory order dated 12-8- 2009 was not complied with and the bail application stood dismissed against the informant opposite party no.2. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that after completing investigation , as far back as on 11-1-2009 2 charge sheet was submitted against the petitioner under sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. This fact has transpired from a copy of the case diary received subsequently. In the facts of the case this Court finds no good ground to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. As a result the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand cancelled. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)