HIGH €OURT OF CHHATFI$6ARH AT BILA5PUR W. P. (5) Na. 2223 of 3007 PzfHloner Rupesh Kumar Pandey 5/0, Mafhura Prasad Pandey Aged about, 36 years, Assistant Project Officer, Zila Pcmchayaf, Korba (ca), R/o, Q‘i'r'. No. 23, Ward No, 35, main road, Torwa, Disfricf Bilaspur (6.6.) Versus Rzsgandenfs 1. The Sfm‘e of Chha‘tisgar'h Through : The Secrefary Deparfmenf of Panchayaf and Rural Development D.K.5. Bhawan, Manfrahya. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Jain? Commissioner 0/0, Devebpment Commissioner, Chhaifisgarh Raipur (Ga) Single Bench: Hcn'bie Mr. Jusfice Snfish K. Agnihah-i. Present : Mr. Pankaj Shrivxmva, Advoca‘re for fhe Petitioners Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer far the Sfcfe/respandenfs. ORDER {Passed on 11'" Day of April, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for “ihe petitioner submits that the petitioner appeared in the recruitment examination in the year 1996 conducted by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission. Being successfui, the petitioner was appointed as Block Development Officer vide order dated 19.2.1999 (Annexure P-I) and joined service on 6.3.1999. Being aggrieved by the order dated 22.7.2005’the petitioner has fiied this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press any other point, except that his representation dated 06.01.2006 (Annexure P/6) pending before the concerned authority be decided within the stipulated time, in accordance with law, an its own @ merit f0 which learned counsel appearing far the Stafe/responden‘rs has n0 objection. If is ordered accordingiy. The responden‘f No. 1 is accordingiy direc‘red 1‘0 consider and decide fhe pending represenfofion dai'ed 05.01.2006 (Aimexur'e P/6) in accordance wifh iow, on ifs own merit within a period of six weeks from The dafe of receipf of a copy of fhis order. In View of fhe foregoing, Te pefi‘rion is disposed of. No order as fo ccsfs. h Consequently, LA. No. 01, appiicafion for grant of im‘erim relief, sinnds disosed of. p l Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- Subhash / /