1 crap5242.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5242 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5241 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Vijay Supadu Patil ...Respondent ..... Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the applicant/State Respondent absent, although served ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 4 th May, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard learned A.P.P. for the applicant. Respondent absent, although served. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 19 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 18.8.2010, passed by the learned 2 crap5242.10 Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parola, in R.C.C. No. 97 of 2003. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 19 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file Criminal Appeal stands condoned and the present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap5242.10