IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14824 of 2008 Between: 1 Mutyala narayana Reddy S/o Thirumala Reddy Minor rep by his father and natural Guardian thirumala Reddy aged about 43 years Occ: Agriculture, r/o Purushothampalli Village, Komarole Mandal, Prakasam District. 2 Sunnapu Ramesh S/o Prasada Rao Minor rep by his Mother and natural Guardian Sunnapu Bala Chennamma W/o Prasada Rao aged 40 years Occ: House wife R/o Komarole Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 3 Kumara Narayana S/o Kumara Venkateshwarlu, Minor rep by his Mohter and natural Guardian Smt. K. Padma Bai W/o Kumara Venkateshwarlu aged 36 years Occ: house wife, R/o Brahmana Street, Komarole Vilalge and mandal, prakasham District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of Andhra Prdesh rep by its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, A.P. Secrtariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 Rajeev Gandhi university of Knowledge Technologies, IIIT Campus, Gatchibowli, Near Hitch City, Hyderabad, rep byits Vice Chancellor. 3 The District Educaton Officer, Government of A.P., Prakasam District, Prakasam. 4 Dedekula Rasool S/o Not Known to the petitioner, C/o Government High School, Komarole Village and Mandal,Prakasham District. 5 Kalagotle Hazrath S/o Not known to the petitioner C/o Vignan High School, Komarole Village and Mandal,Prakasham District. 6 Thota Amaranath S/o Not Known to the petitioner C/o ZP high School, All, Komarole Mandal, Prakasham District. 7 yasam Phalguna S/o Not Known to the petitioner C/o ZP High School, Raj Village, Komarole Mandal, Prakasham District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the respondnets no.1 to 3 in denying selection to the petitioners for admission into IIIT Course for the year 2008-09 and instead of selecting the respondents No. 4 to 7 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Rules and Regulations of the 2nd respondent's Univeristy and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to allot a seat to the petitioners for admissioninto IIIT Course for the year 2008-09 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 14824 OF 2008 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 27th August 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 14824 OF 2008 27th August, 2008.