IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-8916 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 04, 2011 Rakesh Kumar & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - None for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The petition has been filed by the petitioners with the allegations that they being of marriageable age, got married against the wishes of respondent Nos.4 and 5, therefore, are being threatened by the said respondents. Crl. Misc. No. M-8916 of 2011 [2] 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Kamaljit Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Station, Division No.6, Jalandhar, states that the petitioners have given a statement on 17.4.2011 that they do not need protection. 3. In view of the stand of the respondent-State, no further orders need be passed. 4. The petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) July 04, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?