IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 16651 of 1999 Between: 1 G.Raji Reddy, S/o Narasimha Reddy, Odela Village, Odela Mandal, Karimnagar District. 2 B.Narayana Reddy, S/o Ranga Reddy, R/o Gollapalli Village, Sultanabad Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Land Revenue, A.P. Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paddapalli, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring G.O.Ms.No. 392, Revenue (VO) Department, dt. 5.6.1998 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and violatiove of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Arts.14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India, and the same be held as without jurisdiction and contrary to the settled principles of Law and issue the consequential directions the respondents, not to give effect to the said G.O.Ms.No.392; and pass other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.RAMESH SAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri V.Eswaraiah, J.) Ms.Surekha representing Sri C.Ramesh Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. ___________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 17.6.2009 kpr