IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 6061 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.09.2010 Gurvinder Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. J S Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Satpal Singh, states that the challan has been presented in the Court on 24.04.2010 under Section 304/34 of Indian Penal Code. Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous to that extent. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the pleas as raised before this Court at the time of framing of the charge. In case, either of the parties are aggrieved with the said order framing of charge, they are at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. Dismissed as infructuous with liberty as prayed for. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge September 08,2010 mohan