IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18318 of 2011 1. Raja Ram Sah 2. Chandrama Sah 3. Radha Sah 4. Bheem Sah 5. Arjun Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 6. 24.10.2011 It is submitted that the petitioner no. 5 Arjun Sah has been taken into custody. The application is disposed as infructuous with regard to him. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners 1 to 4 in a Police case under Sections 304/34 of the Penal Code is that the allegations at best may make out a case under Section 304A IPC only. Additionally, the deceased was not electrocuted which has been confirmed by the original complainant in the police investigation after the complaint case was sent for being registered as a police case. Counsel for the State submits from the case diary that there are material variations between the allegations as contained in the complaint and as recorded on behalf of the complainant under Section 161 Cr.P.C.] For the purpose of bail, considering that the original complainant is the father of the victim girl making allegations for running of a naked wire across the agricultural field leading to electrocution and subsequently drowning the body of his daughter, the Court is not persuaded in the entirety to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/ (Navin Sinha,J.)