IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17248 of 2009 NANHI THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 21.05.2009 Heard Sri Vivekanand Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. The case is of murder and it is true that the petitioner does not really bear any direct report of committing offence, but other accused persons do. There is specific mention of the fact in the FIR that the three accused persons had come to the house of the deceased and threatened his wife, the informant that he will be murdered on account of the reason that one of the accused persons Raj Kumar wanted to draw some loan against the landed properties of the deceased which he was not ready to do. Regard being had to the discussion of material by the court below, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner’s prayer for regular bail may be considered without being prejudiced by the present order. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)