HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 25th January, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 50 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Gyan Chand S/o Late Sri Buddhu ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 307 of 2010 U/s 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 506 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar Roorkee District Haridwar Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard Shri Rajendra Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Navneet Kaushik, the learned counsel for the complainant and Shri Nandan Arya, the learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submitted that it is a case of civil nature. The learned A.G.A., on the other hand, strongly opposed the bail application and contended that it is a case of cheating. Without commenting any further on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 307 of 2010, U/s 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 506 I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (V.K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge Dated 25.01.2011 Shiv