IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14974 of 2009 1.UMUL ARA, W/O NOORUL ISLAM, VILL.- LAGUA, P.O.- SANKOL, P.S.- ABADPUR, DISTT.- KATIHAR, MUKHIYA GOWN PANCHAYAT RAJ LAGUA, DISTT.- KATIHAR. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, KATIHAR, DISTT.- KATIHAR. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BARSOI BLOCK, DISTT.- KATIHAR 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BARSOI BLOCK, DISTT.- KATIHAR. 5. THE SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ LAGUA, BARSOI BLOCK, DISTT.- KATIHAR. 6. THE MEMBER DISTRICT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KATIHAR. 7. MD. RUSTOM ALI, S/O MD. SAIFULLAH, R/O VILL.- DEGHRAPARA, P.S.- BARSOI, DISTT.- KATIHAR. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 25.01.2010 The petitioner is a Mukhiya of Lagua Panchayat and has challenged the order of the tribunal by which she has been directed to hold counseling of one Md. Rustom Ali and include his name in the next phase of appointment of teachers. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said Md. Rustom Ali had not applied for Lagua Panchayat. He submits that in fact Md. Rustom Ali had applied for one Das Gram Lagua Panchayat which is a different Panchayat. Therefore, technically no counseling could be held for inclusion of his name for the next 2 process of appointment. If that is so, the petitioner is at liberty to point out the same before the tribunal and seek correction in the order. So far as this writ application is concerned, petitioner is not adversely affected by the said order and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the application and the same is dismissed. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)