IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33954 of 2010(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SHIBY PAUL, H.S.A (SANSKRIT) PART TIME, PULIYAPARAMB HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KODUNTHIRAPPULLY, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 001. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.33954 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 18 th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was appointed as HSA (Sanskrit) Part time at Puliyaparamb Aided Higher Secondary School, Kodunthirappully, Palakkad on 20.6.2007 in a resignation vacancy, as per Ext.P1 order of appointment. The District Educational Officer rejected the proposal for approval of the appointment of the petitioner, as per Ext.P2 order. The Manager challenged Ext.P2 order in appeal before the Deputy Director of Education who passed Ext.P3 order dated 26.11.2009 rejecting the appeal. Challenging Ext.P3 order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 revision dated 8 th November, 2010. Ext.P8 is pending disposal. 2. Though several reliefs are prayed for in the Writ Petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the time being, it W.P.(C).No.33954 OF 2010 2 would be sufficient, if a direction is issued to the Government to consider and dispose of Exts.P8 revision expeditiously. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and dispose of ExtP8 revision as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, the Manager and any other affected party. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ Petition and certified copy of the judgment before the third respondent. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE cms