Crl. Misc. No. M-5529 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5529 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 24,2011 Raj Kumar and another ........................................................ Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and another .................................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. R.K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 10.9.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Abohar (Annexure P3) framing charges against the petitioners and the order dated 15.11.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur (Annexure P4) dismissing the revision petition. Mr. R.K.Singla, counsel for the petitioners, has argued that the petitioners were residing separately from Sanjay Soni accused and there was no demand of dowry from them. They have a separate ration card. After going through the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. and other documents placed on record by the prosecution the order of the trial Court has been upheld. At the time of framing of charge the accused are Crl. Misc. No. M-5529 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] entitled to know with certainty the exact nature of charge against them. This will enable them to have a fair trial. From the order dated 15.11.2010 the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. along with other documents placed on the record by the prosecution have been examined to frame a charge against the petitioners. No infirmity is found in the order. Criminal miscellaneous is dismissed. 24.2.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE