1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 23.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD)Nos.13324 and 13325 of 2011 1. P.Thillaikarasi ..Petitioner in W.P.No.13324 of 2011 2. M.Baby ..Petitioner in W.P.No.13325 of 2011 Vs 1. The Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. The Regional Transport Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ..Respondents in both W.Ps' Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein viz., the Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul to include the petitioners herein as one of the parties in the joint inspection to be conducted for the Mini Bus Stage Carriages(1) TN 57 AZ 0266 of K.Subramani (2) TN 57 U 9555 of M.Gopinath and (3) TN 57 AZ 9570 of R.Bharathi to enter into Palani Bus Stand. For Petitioner :M/s.T.Padmanabhan in both W.Ps' For Respondents :Mr.T.R.Janarthanam in both W.Ps' Addl.Govt.Pleader COMMON ORDER The petitioner/P.Thillaikarasi claiming to be one of the Stage Carriage Operator plying on the route Palaniyandavar Arts College to Poranthalaru Dam (via) Palani Bus Stand has submitted a representation, dated 14.11.2011 to the first respondent/The Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul, Dindigul District to add the petitioner as one of the parties in the joint inspection to be conducted on the routes in question. But the said representation till date has not been answered. As a result the petitioner has come up with the present Writ petition in W.P(MD) No.13324 of 2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Similarly, Petitioner/M.Baby has filed another Writ Petition in W.P(MD)No.13325 of 2011 with same set of facts, praying for the same relief. 3. When the matter was taken up today for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader had taken notice on behalf of the respondents and prayed this Court that reasonable time may be given to consider and dispose of the petitioners representations, dated 14.11.2011. 4. Recording the said submission, without going into the merits of the Writ petitions, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the petitioners representations, dated 14.11.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1. The Regional Transport Authority, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2. The Regional Transport Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District +One cc to Mr.T.Padmanabhan, Advocate, SR.No.41037 +Two Ccs to The Spl Govt. Pleader, SR.Nos.41245,41246 vsn rl/6c – 30.11.2011 W.P(MD)Nos.13324 and 13325 of 2011 23.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/