1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1684/2011 KALYAN BHANUDAS PAWAR VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1688/2011 SHAMKUMAR BHAGWAN PAGARE VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Mr. R.S. Shinde, Advocate for applicant (In cri. Appln. no. 1684/2011) Mr.V.D. Salunke, Advocate for applicant (In cri. Appln. no. 1688/2011) A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, VACATION JUDGE Date : 27th May, 2011. 1 Heard Shri Shinde and Shri Salunke learned counsel for applicants, and learned A.P.P. for respondent / State. The present applicants are being prosecuted for offences punishable under section 302, 201, 120(B), 506 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code. The present applicants are in custody since 7th December, 2010. It is submitted that the main accused against whom the allegations are that he had given contract of killing, has already been released on 2 bail by Sessions Court by the order dated 29th April, 2011 in Criminal Application No. 144/2011. 2 The accused are behind the bars for more than five months. The investigation is complete. Their custodial interrogation would no longer require. Even the main accused is already enlarged on bail. Even on the principle of parity, the applicants would be entitled for bail. 3 In light of above, the applicants be released on bail on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) each with one surety each of like amount. The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses. [S.V.GANGAPURWALA] VACATION JUDGE ts k/cri.appln1684.11