THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.2202 of 2009 Dated:19th November, 2009 Between: Mohd. Imam ..... Petitioner AND 1.Pasham Hanumantharao & Ors. .....Respondents *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.2202 of 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 19.03.2009 passed in I.A.No.1389 of 2008 in O.S.No.1 of 2007 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet, whereby and where under the learned Additional District Judge dismissed the application filed under Order 1, Rule 10 r/w. Sec.151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking impleadment of Jashthi Rajyalaxmi as one of the defendants in the suit. 2. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 13.05.2009. Respondents 1, 2 and 4 received notice and respondents 1 and 2 entered appearance through a counsel. Whereas, 4th respondent did not choose to enter appearance either in person or through a counsel. Service of notice on respondent Nos.3 and 5 came to be effected by way of publication in EENADU daily, Suryapet Edition dated 20.10.2009. Notice to 6th respondent is stated to be not necessary. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 4. The petition filed by the petitioner under Order 1, Rule 10 r/w.Sec.151 CPC came to be dismissed for not furnishing the correct address. It is stated in the grounds of revision that the trial Court dismissed the application without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to make an application for substituted service by publication of notice in the local newspapers. No such prayer seems to have been sought for by the petitioner before the trial Court. However, since the petition filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed for not furnishing the correct address and as the rights in respect of the immovable properties are involved, I deem it appropriate to allow this revision giving some time to the petitioner to furnish correct address. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed at the admission stage setting aside the order dated 19.03.2009 passed in I.A.No.1389 of 2008 in O.S.No.1 of 2007 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet, and consequently, I.A.No.1389 of 2008 stands restored to file. The petitioner shall furnish the correct address of the proposed party i.e. Jashthi Rajyalaxmi within three weeks from today, failing which the order of dismissal of the I.A.No.1389 of 2008 shall hold good. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:19th November, 2009. Note: Issue C.C. within three days. B/O Cs THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.2202 of 2009 Dated:19th November, 2009