1 W.P.No.9459/11 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.9459 OF 2011. The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Corporation, Division Office, Latur. ... Petitioner. Versus Baburao S/o Vishvanath Birajdar, Age 48 years, Occ.Service, R/o Madhu Mangal Niwas, Narayan Nagar, Latur. Dist.Latur. ... Respondent. ... Mr.D.S.Bagul, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.K.Joshi, advocate for the Respondent. ... CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 20.12.2011. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. 2 W.P.No.9459/11 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The present Respondent has filed complaint (ULP) No.109/2011, seeking promotion. Along with the complaint, the petitioner also filed an application Exh.U-2 for interim orders. The said application Exh.U-2 is allowed. Aggrieved thereby, the present petition is filed. 4. Mr.Bagul, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court has put a blanket embargo on the right of the petitioner to grant any promotion or appoint anyone on the post of Artisan-A till the final decision of the main complaint. The learned counsel submits that such a blanket order could not have been passed. 5. Mr.Joshi, learned counsel for the Respondent supports the order and submits that the case is to be decided within six (6) months as per the directions given in the order itself. If during the interregnum any promotion is 3 W.P.No.9459/11 effectuated then it would result in multiplicity and the said order is rightly passed. 6. At the end of the proceedings, if it is found that the petitioner is entitled for the relief then in such circumstances, there would be no impediment for the petitioner for the relief from the deemed date. The promotions can be made subject to the decision of the complaint. So also directions can be given to the petitioner to intimate the Court before any promotions or appointments are effectuated But a blanket bar can not be imposed on the petitioner from promoting or appointing any person on the said post. 8. In the result, I pass the following order : (a) The impugned order is set aside and modified to the effect that if the petitioner makes any appointment or promotion on the post of Artisan-A then the same shall be subject to the decision of the complaint. The petitioner shall 4 W.P.No.9459/11 intimate such person that the appointment or promotion is being made subject to the decision of the pending complaint. So also, the petitioner shall intimate the Court about this fact. (b) The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp945911