IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2011 / 7TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23392 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SYAMDEEP C., S/O RAJENDRAN, CHATHAYIL HOUSE, ANAKKARA P.O., PALAKKA KOZHIKODE 2. SINISHA K.C. D/O SAMI P., KARUVACHALIL ODAKKUZHAL, MANAPPALLY COLLEGE, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIOS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, KOZHIKODE 2. REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, KOZHIKODE 673635 SC SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23392 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- A COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2- A COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P3- A COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF THE SUBJECT EEE 810 Bio MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION DATED 20.8.11 EXT.P4- A COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF THE SUBJECT EEE 810 Bio MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION DATED 20.8.11 EXT.P5- A COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT SHOWING THE PAYMENT OF FEE FOR REVALUATION BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 20.8.11 EXT.P6- A COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT SHOWING THE PAYMENT OF FEE FOR REVALUATION BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 20.8.11 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).23392/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 29th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT 1. Petitioners applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech Electrical and Electronics Examination vide Exts.P3 and P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs