^.v^ \^y HIGH COITRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPIJR PETITIONER WntPetttiOTiISlNo.624?_of2OT7 Heeralal Kushwaha, aged about 59 yesas, S/o late Shri Bhaiyalal, Woriung as Compasy Commander, Home Guard, Kaiiker District Kanker (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENT8 1. State of Chfaattisgarh, through the Secretary Home (Home Guard) DKS Bhawaii, Raipur (CG). 2. State ofMadhya Pradesh, through the Seeretary, Home (Home Guard), Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 3. The Director General Home Guard and Civil Defence, Headquarter, Raipur (CG). 4. The Director General Home Guard and Civil Defence, Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur (MP). 5. Sliri B.L. Sahu, Company Commander, Durg. 6. Shri Benedict Tigga, Company Commander, Jagdalpur. 7. Shri N.D. Lohani, Company Commander, Jagdalpur. 8. Shri V.S. Chouhan, Company Commander, Janjgir. 9. Shri R.P. Gupta, Company Commander, Raipur. 10. Shri Ashrafilal Nikhar, Company Coinmandar, Korba. ll.Shri Narsmghram Tandon, Company Commaiider, Bastar. 12.8hri Tejsingh Dharwaria, Company Commaiider, Raigarh. 13.8hri Suresh Prasad Goutani, Company Commander, Durg. (WWT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OP INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Sattsh K, Agmhotri, J.) Present : Shri Utkarsh Venna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Advocate forthe respondent No. 2 & 4. Sliri Satish Gujrta, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 & 3 ORALORDER CPassed on 12"' ofMarch, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appeariiig for the petitioner submits that the relief sou^it for in this petition has already been granted by the respondent airthorities, thus, nothing remains for adjudication. The petition has become infiiictuoug, to which learaed counsel appearing for tlie other side have no objection. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Coiuequently, ^wit petition is dismissed as having become infhictuous. No order asto costs. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge