IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 6636 of 2008. Decided on: 27.07.2010. _________________________________________________________ Sneh Lata. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that her name was not sponsored by the employment exchange for the post of Language Teacher. As per Annexure R-2, the minimum qualification prescribed for filling up the post of Language Teacher is matric and Prabhakar with diploma in language teaching or JBT course from recognized university/Boards by H.P. Government. Admittedly, the petitioner does not possess this qualification. The case of the petitioner that she has obtained Prabhakar, B.Ed., M.A. and M.Ed. degrees will not advance her cause for the simple reason that she does not fulfill the essential educational qualification prescribed in Annexure R- 2. Consequently, action of the respondents of not considering the case of the petitioner for the post of Language Teacher is not illegal. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 27, 2010. (bhupender)