—- ^ i^^•^ //- APPLICANT/ APPELLANT .^€ ..-<'.'^'^" •^••"A^'-",\A-^ •^;'-^ :^ BEFORE THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0. ^ 12010 (S.B.l QSSSfe 1. Ubaran Das Aged about 20 years, Son of shri RamKumar Satnami R/o Village Sinodha, Tah. Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Musammat Jan Bai W/o Bisnath Satnami, aged about 57 years, R/o village Chamarguda, P.C. no. 16/2004,Tah. Bhatapara Disst. "Raipur [C.G.] Ramkumar S/o Kuldas Satnami, aged about 49 years, R/o village—Sinodha, Tah. — Simga Disst. -Raipur [C.G.] NON APPLICANT/ RESPONDENTS 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through; Collector Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION^F SECOND APPEAL.NO. 443 12007 (S.B.) VC-78 *tTqc?T^<TT^ \3W| ^qiqic)«,^-^^14, Rril^^ rra? ./)?.;&..^.-./^?.;.^.//.0. ^20 3IT^$T q^q? (^jcrfgcfe?) OT^^Tcprf^FTfcp ^TT3TT^5TjCTTcp "^ M» Bini btet--.-.--.-... B^RTTW^-lfsa 3TT^5T 27.01.2010: Shri D.R. Dayal, counsel cpi<<Iw<TlTi +ii^oT^"fc^SI <<fuit5;i^ ^3iR|+|3TI^5T for the appiicant. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel|Lawyer for the State. Heard leamed counset f^r the applicant. Leamed counsel for the| appticant submlts that he had flied vakatetnama on 18.01.1009, i1 the matter was called for h^aring, because hte name not recorded In the cause-list. On perusal of the grounj Court finds that the present M^ owever, he could not appear ds mentioned In the applicatlon, thls ^C deserves to be atlowed, and ft 1s thereore, altcwed. Second Appeal No.44^/2007 Is restored to its origjna! number. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge