IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9891 of 2009 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DIPAK KUMAR, S/o Rantanjee, resident of village Phoolwaria, P.O. Makriyar, P.S. Mairwa, District Siwan Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through its Director General of Police, Western Sector, Central Reserve Police Force Mumbai (Maharaster). 2. The Deputy Director of Police Group Central, Central Reserve Police Force, Talegaon Pune Maharastra. 3. Additional Deputy Director of Police Group Central, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 4. The Commandant 145 Battalion, C.R.P.F. Talagaion Bishurupuni, Pune, Maharastra 154 Battalion C.R.P.F. 5. The Deputy Commandant 145 Battalion C.R.P.F. 6. The S.D.O., Siwan, Bihar ----------- 04/ 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner was appointed as a constable in the C.R.P.F. against a vacancy, which was reserved. Later, his caste certificate was found to be forged as the Sub-Divisional Officer, Siwan, from where the said certificate is said to have been issued, reported that no such certificate was issued from his office. In the light of the report of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Siwan, proceeding was initiated against the petitioner and he has been dismissed from service under order dated 27.7.2007, Annexure-4, against which he filed appeal before the D.I.G., but the appeal also failed and the order is dated 20.9.2007, Annexure-5. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that Sub- Divisional Officer, Siwan has issued another certificate, bearing letter no. 33/2007 dated 10.4.2007, as contained in Annexure-2 to this application certifying that petitioner belongs to Gond community which Scheduled Tribes. It is further submitted on 2 behalf of the petitioner that in view of the certificate dated 10.4.2007, Annexure-2, his case should be directed to be reconsidered by the Disciplinary/ Appellate Authority. 4. Without seeking confirmation about the subsequent certificate dated 10.4.2007, Annexure-2, this Court is not in a position to direct the Disciplinary/ Appellate Authority to reconsider their order. 5. Petitioner has got remedy of revision available before the I.G. In the circumstances, this application is disposed of directing the petitioner to avail the remedy of revision before the I.G. highlighting the point that Sub-Divisional Officer, Siwan issued another certificate, bearing letter No. 33/2007 dated 10.4.2007, as contained in Annexure-2 certifying that petitioner belongs to Gond community, which is Schedule Tribe. In the event revision in compliance of this order is filed by the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order then the same be considered and disposed of by the I.G., C.R.P.F. concerned in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within two months of its receipt. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)