IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1589 of 2010 KARO SINGH, S/o Jattu Singh, R/o Village & P.O.- Barail, District – Supaul ……. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……. Opposite Party ----------- 6/ 11.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel the State. Petitioner is denying ownership of ‘Gohal’ from where huge quantity of ‘Mahua’ wine and different kind of other wine was seized. F.I.R. and place of occurrence is clear to show that petitioner was owner of the ‘Gohal’. Later it appears favour of the Investigating Officer either in recording statement of some of the witnesses that they were not knowing owner of the ‘Gohal’ or petitioner not being the owner of the same, but, none of them is stating real owner of the ‘Gohal’ if it was not belonging to this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, presently, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. Praful ( Mandhata Singh , J.)