/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3066 OF 2008 M/s. Crown Ink and Chemicals Co. ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent --- Shri Ashok Mishra for Applicant Shri Rajesh More APP for the State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 8TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the Learned APP for the State. 2. The Applicant is challenging the order passed by the Trial Court, dismissing the complaint under section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 3. I have perused the Roznama. The Roznama indicates that on 11.2.2007, the Complainant and his advocate were absent and thereafter on each and every date they remained absent. No explanation was given by the Complainant for his absence. 4. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that the Complainant's advocate was not well and, as a result, he could not remain present. No explanation is given as to why the Complainant remained absent. Hence, no case is made out for grant of leave. 5. Leave is refused. Appeal does not survive. V.M. KANADE J.