1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.709 of 2008. Ramesh Vishwanath Thakre. Vs. State of Mah and others. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Sudhir Malode, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for State respondent - State. Coram: A. H. JOSHI AND A. B. CHAUDHARY, JJ. Dated: 20th JANUARY 2009. 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner states that as and when the petitioner comes to know the address or whereabouts or any information about the absconding accused, he would inform the same to the Police. He, however, expresses that this expression should not be treated as absolving the police of their responsibilities. 2. It is clarified that the police always have the responsibilities of searching the accused and on search, arresting him, as the warrant is to 2 be executed unless cancelled. The statement of assurance contained in the affidavit-in-reply adequately takes care of the apprehension of the petitioner. 3. No further orders are required., 4. In view of this, learned Advocate for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the petition. 5. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE Sbm