1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.714/2008 (Narsi Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 18, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Niranjan Singh, for the petitioners. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that after investigation, the police did not find case against the petitioners and no charge-sheet against them was filed. However, at the stage of trial, on an application under section 319 Cr.P.C., the trial court took the cognizance of the offences under sections 307, 148, 323, 326, 324 read with section 149 I.P.C. and summoned the petitioners by non-bailable warrant and thereafter, the petitioners appeared before the trial court and moved an application, which came to be dismissed. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merit of the case, and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the 2 parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Narsi Ram s/o Mani Ram, Hanuman s/o Kalu Ram and Nanu Ram s/o Kalu Ram be released on bail in FIR No.126/2004, P.S. Ghamoodwali, Distt. Sri Ganganagar provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-