IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 18TH DECEMBER 2006 / 27TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WP(C).No. 32107 of 2006(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ FRANCIS VARGHESE (K.F.VARGHESE), AGED 73 YEARS, KARUMANCHEARI HOUSE, EZHUPUNNA SOUTH P.O., CHERTHALA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.N.R.CHANDRASEKHARAN SRI.K.SAJAN KURIAKOSE SRI.T.H.CHACKO RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHIATHODU POLICE STATION, KUTHIATHODU P.O., CHERTHALA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTHIATHODU P.O., CHERTHALA. 3. K.V.JAYKISH, S/O.FRANCIS VARGHESE, EZHUPUNNA SOUTH P.O., CHERTHALA. 4. SHEEBA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, D/O.KUNJAPPAN, KUNNUMMEL VEEDU, KANJIRAM CHIRA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).32107/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.14021 DATED 25.10.2006 FOR PAYING BUILDING TAX BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT NO.2759090 DATED 25.10.2006 ISSUED FROM THE KODAMTHURUTHU VILLAGE OFFICE TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 10.10.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENTS AGAINSTS THE RESPONDENT 3 AND 4. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.235/06 DATED 11.10.2006 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 20.10.2006 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER REGARDING THE RECEIPT OF COMPLAINT AGAINST RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4. J.B.KOSHY & K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.32107 OF 2006 (V) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December, 2006 J U D G M E N T KOSHY,J. This is a petition for police protection. There are some disputes between the petitioner and his son 3rd respondent. We are not expressing any opinion regarding the civil disputes between the parties. However, police is directed to see that lives of the parties are not endangered. Counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that he will not make any physical threat to the petitioner. That is recorded. With the above observations this writ petition is disposed of. J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE prp J.B.KOSHY & K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------- O.P.NO. OF 2006 () --------------------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T --------------------------------------------------------- 17th November, 2006