[1] SB CRIM. MISC. PET. 880/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 880/2009 CHHATRAPAL SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. Date: 07.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore for Mr. Manu Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. H.K. Saini, Advocate for complainant-respondent. **** The instant criminal revision petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 30.03.2009 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.4, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Criminal Revision No. 23/2009(132/2009), whereby the Revisional Court has upheld the order dated 07.01.2009 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.11, Jaipur City, Jaipur, by which the application of the petitioner for allowing cross examination of complainant PW1 Govind Sabdani has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested that in the interest of justice one chance may be provided to the petitioner to cross examine the complainant, even on the cost, which has not been opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant-respondent. [2] SB CRIM. MISC. PET. 880/2009 Having considered the rival submissions of the respective parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice, this Court deems it proper to provide one chance to the petitioner to cross examine complainant PW1 on the next date fixed in the matter by the trial Court i.e. 09.12.2009 subject to depositing the cost of Rs. 1,000/-. If the petitioner fails to cross examine the complainant on the said date, the order passed by the trial Court as well as the Revisional Court shall remain in force. With these observations, the misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/