(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 6068 OF 2010 Atul s/o. Ganpat Mhaske, Age : 26 years, Occupation : Doctor, R/o. Ukadgaon, Post at Sandva, Taluka & District : Ahmednagar. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. Maharashtra University of Health Science, Nashik, Vani Road, Mhasrul, Nashik. 3. Principal, Kakasaheb Mhaske Homeopathy Medical College, Post-Graduate Institute, Bolegaon Phata, Ahmednagar, Taluka & District : Ahmednagar. 4. Dr. Subhash Kisan Mhaske, Management Trustee, Kakasaheb Mhaske Homeopathy Medical College, Post-Graduate Institute, Bolegaon Phata, Ahmednagar, Taluka & District : Ahmednagar. .. Respondents. (2) ....................... Mr. A.S. Zarekar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate, for respondent no.2. Mr. A.N. Kakade, Advocate, for respondent nos.3 and 4. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondent nos.3 and 4, to hand over the internship completion certificate of B.H.M.S. course to the petitioner. (3) 3. Mr. A.N. Kakade, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos.3 and 4, states that the respondent nos.3 and 4 do not have any personal grudge against the petitioner. However, since the petitioner has not completed internship properly, the certificate is not issued to the petitioner. He further submits that inadvertently, the record of the petitioner was sent to the University along with the other students. 4. Mr. K.C. Sant, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 / University, submits that after record of each of the students is received by the respondent no.2 / University, the University examines the case of each of the candidates and the internship completion certificates, of such of the candidates who are found to be entitled, are sent for disbursement. 5. It is the specific stand of the University, that on verification and finding the petitioner to be entitled to the aforesaid certificate, the same has been forwarded to the respondent nos.3 and 4 for disbursement to the petitioner. In view of the specific stand of the University, we find that the respondent nos.3 and 4 have no reason to withhold the same. 6. In the result, the petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause "C". The compliance be done (4) within a period of two weeks from today. However, parties shall bear their own costs. ( A.A. SAYED ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp6068