IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10188 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- SREENADH.K.C. AGED 20 YEARS, S/O. CHITRANGATHAN,KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.KAIPAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT. BY STANDING COUNSEL SHRI P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.10188 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was a student of Sree Narayana College, Nattika, Thrissur for B.A. Economics. He appeared for the second year examination English in the year 2006. After publication of results the petitioner applied for revaluation of English paper. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 stating that the answer script of his English paper I is not traceable and hence a direction is issued to write re-examination of that subject. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition has been filed. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that the subject English consists of 3 papers and two papers were revalued and there is no change in the result. With regard to the paper English I answer paper was not traceable and therefore a memo was issued to him as per Ext.P3. He was directed to forward a declaration, but that also was not given. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he was staying abroad in connection with the job and WPC.No.10188 of 2010 : 2 : therefore he could not respond in time. In the light of the situation arising as above, presently the petitioner can only appear for the examination, if permitted by the University. If the petitioner submits appropriate representation requesting for a chance to appear in the re-examination the same will be considered and appropriate action will be taken by the University. The petitioner will file a representation along with a copy of the judgment for consideration by the University immediately. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) skj