IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (c.G.) w.P. No. g9@ /2oos PETITIONER S.K. Pasayat f f . Aged about 61 years S/o. Late Venudhar Pasayat Assistant Professor Late Raja Virendra Bahadursingh, Shashkiya Mahavidyalaya, Saraipali (C.G.), R/o. Near Maa Ghanteshwari Mandir Saraipali, Dist.Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh :1‘r Through : Secretary (V Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Mantraiaya, (C.G:) 2. Deputy Secretary / Department of Higher Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI—HC-78 HW,WW,W . oo.ooo.o.o.oo.oo.oo. a1 200g (9f WW(W) WNW WWW WW§WW mwm %31%11311%3T ‘§ 12-7-2006 Mr. Raghavendm Pradhan, :ounsei for fhe pefi‘i‘ioner‘. A v Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt ocafe for fhe Sfafe/r-espondenfs/Cavea‘ror. Heard bofh fhe counsei. By ‘l'he insfan? wri? pe'l'ifio , The pefi's'ioner has chaHenged fhe ‘rransfer order dafed 30-6-2006 passed y respondenf No.2, whereby fhe pefifioner who is working a3 Assisfanf Pro essor in La‘i'e Raja Virendra 8ahadur‘ Singh Govt Coilege, Saraipaii has be n fransfer'red 1'0 Govt College, Surajpur, Disfricf: Surguja. The main ground of challe 9e is Thaf fhe pefi‘rioner is going to refire in fhe monfh of June, 2007 and on 11 monfhs are ief‘r, even Then, he has been Transfer-red, ?ha'r €‘oo cn‘ a disfan e of more Than 300 kms‘ and fhe pe'fi‘rioner's home disfricf is Mahasamund. re is a Government poiicy fha? as for as possibie a person w'no is supposea‘ “to refir‘e wiihin a period of one year shoH no? be fransferr-ed. Learned counsel for The pe ifioner submifs ‘rha‘? aporf from fhe above, i ihe pe‘i'i'iioner is aiiowed To iron fer if wiii be difficui? To se'i‘i'ie ‘ihe pension. case of ‘ihe pe‘iiiioner. In fhe ci cumsfances, learned oounsei submiifed ihai ihe pe‘iii’ioner may be aiiowed To oke a represeniotion To respondeni- No.3; and in furn, respondeni No.1 be dire ‘i’ed 1'0 decide The represen'ioi'ion, fo which learned counsel appearing for the Sfa’ie/respondem‘s has no objecfion. Having heard learned coun el for fhe pariies, having regard ‘io The faeTs and circumsTences of The case an wiThouT expressing any opinion on meriT of The case, The requesT made by le rned counsel for The peTiTioner is jus‘i, fair ! e f XI-HC—78 m w , m , m 6a mm ~ w$>340 a1 200A WW(W) W$r1é=da§ WWYTW WWW _ z— WW§WW éswm ' represefrmfion raising a” his gr-ie a pei‘i'iicner is aiiowed fa make a defaiied Sor‘rS‘b} and reasonable. Therefore, fh responden‘l‘ No.1 wifhinvfan days f decide 1'he r‘epresen‘rafion wifhin considering fhe pain-rs raised b) lances annexing a copy of 'ihe wri‘i‘ pe‘i'ii’ion To rom ioday and responden‘r No.1 is direcfed fo me mom-h from The dam of i'i-s receipf affer- ‘rhe pe‘rii'ioner, in an objec‘i'ive manner, in accordance wifh law. Considerimg fhe poinfs raised by The pefifioner‘, fhe effec? and cper‘a‘i‘ion of ‘i‘he i‘ pe’ii‘iioner is si'ayed, iii] fhe repr ihaf if i'he pefi‘iioner is already m Wifh The direcfions afar-es 31' relieved. Consequen'fly, M.(W.)P.No.x disposed of. pugned fransfer' order- in respecf of ‘rhe sen'i'a‘i’ion is decided, subjecf 1'0 fhe condii'ion aid, The pemion sfands disposed oi: 2611/2006 and I.A.No.6680/2006 also s‘iand Pariies are enii‘i'ied for cei ‘i'ified copy of ‘rhis srder. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge W Q