IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5324 of 2009 Between: G.V.L.N. Choudary & others. … Petitioners And The Govt, of India, rep., by its Directorate of Adult Education, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K. Neelakanteswara Rao for Sri S.R. Sanku This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5324 of 2009 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in passing the impugned memo No.3322/B4/DAE/2006, dated 02.03.2009 and proceedings in Rc. No.3322/B4/DAE/2006, dated 01.01.2009 forcing the CECs/NCECs to necessarily purchase 184 titles of SRC hyd alone, ignoring in toto the mandatory invitation to publishers like the writ petitioners and others too to offer their titles as illegal, contrary to the proceedings of the respondent No.1 dated 14.05.2008 and NLM guidelines for production selectiodn and purchase of books for CECs and it is further consequentially prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to continue to implement the list of books purchased by CECs and NCECs before the present arbitrary selection of 184 titles of SRC was made and it s further consequentially prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the activity of the Deputy Directors/ZSSs in the matter of purchasing of books as per the list existing prior to the present list of 184 titles and it is further consequentially prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set aside the proceedings of the respondent No.2 in Rc. No.3322/B4/DAE/2006, dated 01.01.2009 including its memo No.3322/B4/DAE/2006, dated 02.03.2009 directing the respondent No.2 to strictly invite all the other publishers like the writ petitioners by way of due publicity as per norms, to enable them to participate in the process of selection and purchase of books as is in vogue, without necessarily selecting the books of SRC alone.” At the hearing, Sri K. Neelakanteswara Rao representing Sri S.R. Sanku, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP.Nos.6951 and 8698 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 26.07.2011 ES