l^i ^•^(voL-. IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) N0. ^n--^- PETITIONER ^.^s ^•i^S. •••-;.^' '^•'-" ^^ ^v'' ^®v fi. ^u? / <<?y ^c^y J~^ ^ .^ ^ 15?t;ri3Snts'" ^ Ghanshyam Sahu, S/o- Mangalu Sahu, Aged about 36 years, R/o. Jamgaon, Block Pingeshwar, Tahsil Rajim, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS > 1] State ofChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) , 2] Secretary, ichool Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur, Distrlct Raipur (Chhattis^rh) / 3] Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ,4] Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) / 5] Block Education Officer, Gariyaband, District Raipui- (C.G.) , 6] Asst. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare E)epartment, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) L^... ...•.: y^' U3> HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 5177 of 2006 Petitioner: Ghanshyam Sahu Versus Resuondents: State of Chhatdsgarh & ofhers Single Beach; Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Agaihotri. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for tlie petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for f.he Respondents. OR D E R 4*h October, 2006) The foUo'wiin.g order of the Court is passed by Satish H. 1. L<amed counsel for tlie petitioner siibnuts tliat. the petitiouer was eniployed as Assistailt Teacher and was workuig at Goveniineiit iniddle school Gariyabaad. As per the Rationalization ofTeachers Policy dated 8.6.2006 (Annexnie P/2) the petitioner was transferred vide Qixier da.ted 29.6.2006 (Annexiire P/3) to Priaiary School Bagdabra (Gariyaband). 2. 3t is fiirther submitted bv learoed counsel for the petitioner fhat the petitioner, being aggrieved, has filed ai]. appeal befoie the statatoiy axithonty and the saine is pending consideration. 3. Tb.is petition is inisconceived as writ caanot. be filed pendin^ sta.tutoiy appeal before the appellate a-uthorily. 4. Thus; tbis petition is disniissed as being devoid ofmerit. However, in the facts a.nd cu'cuinstaoces of the case, it is expected that the appellate ailthorily inay do the needful in accordance witli law expeditiously. No order as to cost.s. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Thakur i Jud8e