/ % Awa) (b9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S)N0. Qf (0b /201o 3 Mam} Kumal Candravanshi /o Shatruhan Prasad Chandxavanshx Aged about 28 years sh1ksha karml III PS Mathamkurdh Block- Kawardha Dlsmct —Kab1rdham (C.G.) VERSUS ; __’ RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District kawardhaDisstzkabirdham (C.G) Block education Officer, kawardha, Disst: kabirdham (CG Education Officer, WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OE INDIA C h ) State of C.G. 8:. Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shn' Deepak Jain, c'ounse-l for the pemioner. Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.L. for the State. ORDER (24. 1 1 .2010) Grievance of the petitioner in thié. petition is that initially he was appointed as Contract Teacher Grade III and themaftcr as Shiksha Karmi Grade III but he is not being permitted to appear for the post of Head Master on. the gIOund that he do not have the experience of seven years as Shjksha Karmi. 2. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that now the government has taken a decrsmn to penmt all those SbJksha Karmm who have the expenence of seven years elther on the post of Contract Teacher or on the post of Sh1ksha Karrm and therefore, there remams nothing in the present petition. He has shown the letter dated 19.11.2010 issued by the Director, Public Instrucn'ons, Raipur addressed to the Advocate General. Copy of the said letter has been given to Shri Jain also and he is satisned with the same. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the examination for the post of head master is V scheduled for 28.11.2010 &. 29.11.2010 and as the petitioner is apprehending that he may not be permitted to appear in (the same, a direction may be issued to the competent authority to permit him to appear in the said examination. ,t" w . , . W \\ \ 3. State counsel submits that the appmhension of the petitioner is premature and if he has duly mled in the application forms, the authority concerned would act pursuant to the decision taken by the State Government Vide letter dated 19. 1 1 .20 10. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, as nothing survives in the petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to permit the petitioner to aypear in the examination to be m held on 28.11.2010 as 29.11.2010 for the post of. Head Master pmsuant to the decision taken by the State Govemment subject to the verihcation of the fact that the petitioner has hlled in his form and the same has been duly accepted by the authority concerned If the grievance of the petitioner still survives, he would be at 4 1. i libeity to approach this Court. r V" Sd/- \ . Pritinker Diwaker :\ Judge