IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2755 of 1991 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2838 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- RAJESHKUMAR C UNADKAT Versus DIST PANCHAYAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2755 of 1991 MR MD RANA for Petitioner No. 1 MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent No. 1-2 2. Special Civil Application No. 2838 of 1991 MR MD RANA for Petitioner No. 1 MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 01/09/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1.0. Mr. M.D. Rana learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners by way of these petitions have prayed for regularization of their services but subsequently, their services were terminated and the petitiones have separately challenged such termination orders. 2.0. In that view of the matter, now nothing survives in these petitions. The petitions stand disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. [K.S. JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/