C? {m L @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.§No. /200§— (3.3.) PETITIONEH , /8mt. A.S. Joshi, . ® W/o Sanjay Joshi, aged about 42 years, R/o Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretaly , Education D.K.S. Bhawan 3“; ‘ 1 § / Q6 $~é RESPON DENTS . Department Raipur (C.G.) 94 Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) 7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BILAsPUR W. P. (S) No. 1163 of 2007 ‘ Pefi'fioner : Smf. A.5. Jodmi Versus State of Chha'l‘fisgnrh & anofhar Respondams singk Bench: Hon‘ble Mr. Jus'rice swish K. Agnihafri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocn're for the petitioner. Smf. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemmen't Advocnfe for ihe Siam/respondent's. O R D E R (Passed on +his 28*” Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for flue petitioner submits that the pefi‘i'ioner is working as Leciurer, The pe1i+ioner obtained B. Ed. Examination oeriifica‘te on 2.9.1995, on his own expensee Learned counsel appearing for fhe peiifioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher. who obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this court in the case of Vasimm lamp 3mm vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another (2006 (II) MPJR—CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwqi Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are-covered by fhe circulur‘da'red 24.12.98 issued by fha Sfa're 6ovemm¢m of Mudhya Prudesh. Learned counsel for 'rhe pefi-Honer furfher slbmi'rs fha'l' fhz fads and question of law invoked in the present ens: are squareiy covered by decision of 'rhis Court in 1he case of Yoshwan'f Mar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporafion, burg and another (Supra), to which Ieamed counsel appearing for ‘ihe respondenis fairiy concedes and agrees wi1+i fhe avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for fhe pe'l’ifioner. Accordingly, the wrif pefifion is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Vaslwant Kunar Bharawaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another (Supra), abject to verification of the fact as to whether the pefitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and further whe1her he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. l Sdl— l Satish K.Agniho‘tra l Judge Subhash