1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11208 of 2008 Decided on: 25.5.2011 Chet Ram ….Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. S.K. Sood, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Bhawna Dutta, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. S.K. Sood, learned Counsel for the petitioner has only pressed for relief No. 2 i.e. regarding the payment of bonus/ex-gratia to the petitioner for the years 1995 to 2000. It is not in dispute that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner. The Disciplinary Authority has imposed a penalty upon him. He has preferred an appeal. The appeal has been dismissed. A Division Bench of this Court in a judgment rendered in CWP (T) No. 6156 of 2008, titled as Chet Ram versus the Managing Director, H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation and others, decided on 8th September, 2010, has directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal preferred by the petitioner, afresh by passing a reasoned/speaking order. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. 2 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Corporation to consider the case of the petitioner towards the payment of bonus from the due date, within a reasonable period, in case the appeal preferred by the petitioner is accepted. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. May 25, 2011 (hl)