MC 561/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA.. Heard Mr. P. Talukdar, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. B.K. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. By means of this application, the petitioner has prayed for appropriate action against the Respondent No.5 for alleged violation of the order dated 23.7 .2010. It is the case of the petitioner that during pendency of the writ petitio n, the said respondents have appointed the Respondent No.6 as Anganwadi Worker. On perusal of the order dated 23.7.2010 by which the writ petition was entertain ed, this Court provided that appointment of the Respondent No.6 as Anganwadi Wor ker shall be subject to further order to be passed in the writ petition. Thus, t here is no stay order as such operating against appointment of the Respondent No .6. If the Respondent No.6 has been appointed by the Respondent No.5, same canno t be said to be in violation of the said order dated 23.7.2010. Consequently, th e prayer made in this application cannot be granted. Misc. Case Stands disposed of.