In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1996 of 2009 Date of decision: April 21, 2009 Ram Mehar .. Petitioner Vs. Manish and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 10.2.2009 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The Apex Court in case H.S. Ahammed Hussain vs. Irfan Ahammed 2002 (3) R.C.R. (Civil) 563 has observed as under :- “we are of the view that the amount of compensation awarded in favour of the mothers should not be kept in fixed deposit in a nationalised bank, there may be its premature withdrawal in case the parties so intended.” Similarly, this Court in case Mohinder Singh and others vs. Kulbir Singh, 2008 (3) PLR 736 observed that “when the claimant require money for his treatment then the deposit of the amount in a nationalised bank would not serve purpose. Here in this case, the trial court has not awarded the compensation to the claimant-petitioner for the injuries suffered by him and he had obtained 100% disability, therefore, besides for his own treatment, he needed money for solemnization of marriage of his daughter. The claimant certainly is an adult and the grounds submitted by him and supported by AW-3, convince me to infer that he was in real requirement of the money. Civil Revision No. 1996 of 2009 -2- *** As such, the instant petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the FDR No. TDR/MPL/C-0290123 dated 16.4.2008 is ordered to be released to the claimant-petitioner against proper receipt and identification. April 21, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge