IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2007 IN criminal writ petition no. 1696 of 2007 Sitaram Atmaram Ghag .... Applicant versus M/s. Carona Ltd. & ors ...... Respondent. Mrs. Rohini A. Wagh for the applicant. Mr. S.R.Shinde APP for State. Mr. A.H.H. Ponda for Respondent. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 03RD DECEMBER, 2007 DATED; 03RD DECEMBER, 2007 DATED; 03RD DECEMBER, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The learned counsel for the applicant invites my attention to the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court (B.H. Marlappalle, J.) dated 4-9-2007 in Criminal W.P.No. 1696/07 and contended that what is infact stayed by the said order is the order passed by the Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai dated 16-5-2007 in Misc. Application Nos. 495 and 505 of 2007. It is also pointed out that the order dated 12-6-2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No.522/07 is in favour of the applicant. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent does not dispute the said position and hence, correction sought for by the applicant vide the present application is granted. Fix the matter for admission after one week. Rule made absolute in terms of prayer (a). ...