1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2010 Latif Fakir s/o Mohd. Patel & ors. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS Shaikh Taj s/o Shaikh Babanbhai & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for applicants Shri A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 Shri Y.B. Pathan, Advocate for respondent No.4 ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 15th November, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Notice of appellant No.5 is awaited since long. Mr. Bhandari desires to proceed, based on other appellants. Appeal to the extent of appellant No.5 is dismissed. 2. Heard. Learned counsel for the revision applicants, the trustees, alleged that the respondents (original plaintiffs) are not in possession of the agricultural field. However, lastly learned counsel submits that, in spite of there being grant of temporary injunction below Exh.5 dated 31.10.2009, if the proceedings are concluded by the learned Presiding Officer within a time bound frame, the purpose of present revision will be achieved. 2 3. Without commenting on the so called defects narrated by the revision applicants, the order under challenge does not require for any interference as the learned Judge has elaborately dealt with the prima facie possession of the respondents, in paragraph No.6 of the order. 4. The maintainability of the suit was also projected. The learned Judge will certainly deal with the same. The order under challenge remain unaltered. However, learned Presiding Officer shall ensure to expedite the hearing of the suit being Suit No.86/2009, to be done within 9 months. Civil Revision Application dismissed with above observations. No costs. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cra4.10