IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.46 of 2006 SRI BANARSI PRASAD MANDAL, SON OF LATE ADHIK LAL MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BAHADURPUR, P.O. HARINMAR(BISHANPUR), VIA-GOGRI JAMALPUR, PERGANA-FARKIA, P.S. MUFFAZSIL, SUB- REGISTRY AND DISTRICT- MUNGER…………………………………………PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT. Versus 1. SRI KAMAL PRASAD SAH, SON OF LATE MUNNA SAH. 2. MISHRI SAH, SON OF LATE CHHATU SAH. BOTH RESIDENTS OF GOPI BAZAR, P.S. GOGRI, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT SONBARSA, RAJ, PERGANA-FARKIA, P.O. AND P.S. SONBARSHA, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 3. YOGENDRA PRASAD SINGH. 4. UPENDRA PRASAD SINGH. 5. JAI PRAKASH SINGH. 6. ASHOK PRASAD SINGH. ALL SONS OF LATE LAXMI SINGH, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-BAHADURPUR, GRAM PANCHAYAT AND P.O. HARINMAR(BISHANPUR), DISTRICT-MUNGER. ………………………….DEFENDANT/RESPONDENTS IST SET. 7. DAUNI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI KAILASH ROY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. SHARAUN, P.S. CHAUTHAM, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA. 8. URMILA DEVI, WIFE OF KARTIK MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SITAKUND, HASANPUR, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT- MUNGER. 9. KUSHMA DEVI, WIFE OF LAXMI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAHADURPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, HARINMAR, P.O. HARINMAR(BISHANPUR), VIA-GOGRI JAMALPUR, P.S. BARIARPUR(MUFFASIL), DISTRICT-MUNGER. 10. TILAK SAH, SON OF LATE CHHATU SAH. 11. SARYUG SAH, SON OF TILAK SAH. BOTH RESIDENTS OF GOGRI BAZAR, P.O. AND P.S. GOGRI, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA. 12. BINOD MANDAL, SON OF ANARSHI MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BAHADURPUR, PERGANA, FAKRIA, P.S. MUFFASIL, P.O. HARINMAR(BISHANPUR), VIA-GOGRI JAMALPUR, DISTRICT-MUNGER. 13. MAHENDRA SAH, SON OF LATE GONAR SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. GOGRI, P.S. GOGRI, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA. …………………………………DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS. …………………………………………………...RESPONDENTS. ----------- 12. 9.7.2009. No one appears to press this Second Appeal when it is called out for - 2 - hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 C.P.C. It appears that earlier when the matter was placed for hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 C.P.C. none had appeared for the appellant. Thereafter on 23.4.2009 and 6.5.2009, prayer on behalf of the appellant was made for adjournment which was duly granted and notwithstanding the same no one appears to press this appeal when it is called out. The same is dismissed for non prosecution. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)