IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.4287 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4287 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4287 OF 2008 Vikram Purushottam Chauhan and Anr. .. Applicants. Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr A.P.Mundargi,Sr.Advocate, with Mr Shaunak Mehta, for the applicants. Mr Y.S.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. D.B.BHOSALE,J. D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 05/12/2008 DATE : 05/12/2008 DATE : 05/12/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Mundargi, learned senior counsel for the applicants and Mr Shinde, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.I-44 of 2007 of Manikpur police station, Vasai, Dist.Thane. The said crime has been registered against the applicants and one another for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302,323, 504,506 read with 34 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that on 3.2.2007 the present applicants assaulted the deceased - Suresh Chavan with wooden stump and committed his murder. I have perused the FIR lodged by Rajendra Chavan on 4.2.2007 at 6.50 am. The complainant is an eye-witness and he has given the detailed account as to how the incident occurred attributing specific overt act to the present applicants. The medical evidence also supports his statement. There are other eye-witnesses also and their statements are consistent with the statement of the complainant. In my opinion, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicants on bail. Hence, the application is rejected. Trial is expedited. . While rejecting this application, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)