IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL : 739 of 2008 And Writ petition NO. 15190 OF 2008 Between: 1 Madarasa-I-Aizza rep.by its SEcretary Mr.Mahaboob Alam Khan 16-4-1/A,New Malakpet, Hyderabad 2 Nawab Shah Alam Khan, College of Engineering and Technology, 16-4-1/A, New Malakpet,Hyderabad, rep.by its Correspondent Mr.Mahaboob Alam Khan 3 Mr.Mahaboob Alam Khan S/o. Shah Alam Khan R/o.Rahatkada,Barkatpura, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary,Minority Welfare Department, Secretariat Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 The Government of AP., rep.by its Principal Secretary Higher and Technical Education Department, Secretariat Saifabad,Hyderabad 3 The Commissioner & Directorate of Technical Education BRKR Buildings, Hyderabad 4 AP State Council for Higher Education, Rep.by its Secretary,Masab Tank,Hyderabad 5 The Convenor, EAMCET-AC-SW-II2008 (Admissions) JNTU, Kukatpally, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering and passing orders on the application of the petitioners fro grant of minority status Certificate to the 2nd petitioner institution as being illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith process and pass orders on the application of the petitioners for grant of minority status certificate to the 2nd petitioner institution and treat the 2nd petitioner institution as a minority educational institution for all purposes and permit the 2nd petitoner institution to function as such and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned Advocate for the appellants has fairly submitted that the grievance ventilated in the petition as well as in the appeal has already been redressed during the pendency of the petition. In the circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal as well as the petition. Permission granted. The appeal as well as W.P.No. 15190 of 2008 stand disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 17th July, 2008. _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR