IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21338 of 2004 Between: 1. B. Ramakrishna Yadav, S/o Eswaraiah,Police Constable, R/o H.No. 70/126 D6, Kallur, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2. P. Rama Narasimhulu, S/o P.Ch. Pamulety,26 years,Police Constable, R/o Beeravolu village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool, Kurnool District. PETITIONERS. AND 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool,Kurnool District. 2. The Chairman, State Level Police Recruitment Board, A.P. Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the non-granting of interim orders in O.A. No. 6240/2004 by Tribunal and issuing notice while admitting the O.A. dated 18-11-2004 and also the impugned memo C.No. A1/1005/2004, dt. 10-11-2004 and the un-communicated orders issued by the 2nd respondent vide A/M Rc.No. 1244/R & T/Gen1-2/2003, dt. 9-11-2004 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : ORDER:(Per Sri Justice G.Bikshapathy) 1. This Writ Petition is filed at a premature stage. 2. The action of the respondents in not sending the petitioners to training consequent upon their selection as police constables was challenged before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, admitted the O.A.No.6240/2004 and issued notice. At that point of time, the present Writ Petition is filed seeking appropriate direction to send the petitioner to the training pending disposal of the O.A.No.6240/2004. 3. We have heard the learned Counsel at length. We are not inclined to appreciate the contentions raised by him. This writ petition is pre-mature as the Tribunal did not pass any orders on merits. Though the matter relates to the cancellation of employment on the ground that the petitioners have suppressed certain information, but we are not inclined to record any finding on this aspect. We feel it appropriate that the O.A. will be decided at an early date. 4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction that the Tribunal may dispose of the O.A.No.6240/2004 as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy this order. (G.BIKSHAPATHY,J) (P.S.NARAYANA,J) 24-11-2004 Note: CC in two days. BO dvs To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2. The Chairman, State Level Police Recruitment Board, A.P. Hyderabad. 3. The Registrar, A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 4. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Services I, A.P. High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 5. Two CD copies. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21338 of 2004 24th November, 2004