IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.212 of 2008 BANARSI SAFI, son of Late Prem Lal Safi, resident of Village and P.O. Parsa Bisanpur, through Raiyam Sugar Factory, P.S. Keoti, District Darbhanga. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Director, Panchayati Raj, Bihar. 3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai. 4. The Block Development Officer, Bhagwanpur, Begusarai. 5. The District Treasury Officer, Begusarai. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 4. 8.4.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The petitioner superannuated on 31st of May, 2004 from the post of Panchayat Supervisor while working in Bhagwanpur Block within the district of Begusarai. However, despite the necessary information sought for by the Office of the Accountant General as per letter no.Pen-9-1351 dated 17th of March, 2008, contained in Annexure A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Accountant General, the service book with the necessary information regarding the correct pay scale of the petitioner has not been furnished by the Block Development Officer, Bhagawanpur Block, Begusarai, as a result of which the petitioner is not receiving the correct and full pension. It is submitted that notwithstanding the fact that the correct pay scale of the petitioner is not being communicated to the Accountant General, as sought for by his letter, as contained in Annexure A, as referred to above, a sum of Rs.11,953/- has been recovered from the gratuity of the petitioner to the tune of Rs.1,61,410/- after his retirement. It is further submitted that the said recovery of Rs.11,953/-, which has been made pursuant to letter 2 no.544 dated 6.5.2005 (Annexure 8), is not correct. The learned counsel for the State submits that the aforesaid grievances of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievances as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the District Magistrate, Begusarai (respondent no.3), with a copy to the Accountant General, Bihar Patna (respondent no.6). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reason thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)