IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15545 of 2011 PINTU PRASAD GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 26.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 17.3.2011 in connection with Complaint case no. 1426C/2009 for the offence punishable under sections 498A and 379 of the IPC. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant and her family members used to pressurize the petitioner to part his ways from his parents and when the petitioner refused to oblige the complainant, the complainant lodged the present case at the instance of her family members. It is also contended by him that the complainant hardly spent two and half months in the house of the petitioner and there is no chance of resolving the dispute of the parties, particularly, in the circumstance, when the petitioner has already suffered a lot remaining in jail custody for more than two months. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Pintu Prasad Gupta, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Complaint Case no.1426C/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)