IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 4847 of 2009 Between: Sri Rajasthani Jain Shwethamber Murthy Pujak Sangh Rep. by its Secretary, Sri. Dhanpath Seth, S/o. Indermal Seth Shwethamber Murthy Punak Sangh', R/o. Flat No.4, I Floor, Happy Enclave, Balam Raj, Sec'bad. Having its Office at 'ARADHANA BHAVAN' situated at Rangrez Bazar, Near General Bazar, Secunderabad - 500 003. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Registrar General cum Inspector General of Registration Having Office at Rama Krishna Cine Studio, Golconda Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Registrar of Societies Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad. 3 Sri Rajasthani Jain Swetambr Moorthy Poojak Sangh Reptd. by its Secretary, Mr. Manik Chand Samderiya, R/o. H.No. 7-2-715, Pot Market, Secunderabad. Registered Society (Registration No. 35 of 2008), Kanchar Bazar, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27-10-2008 to by not canceling the Respondent No.3 Society which is registered on 26-04-2008 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 to cancel the registration of the Respondent No.3 Society. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.KALYANA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: G.P. FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO.4847 OF 2009 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.27.10.2008 and also for a direction to respondent No.3 society not to manage the affairs of the properties of the petitioner. Heard both sides and at the request of both the learned Counsel, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for hearing at the interlocutory stage. Though several contentions are raised in the Writ Petition, the main grievance in the Writ Petition is non-consideration and non- disposal of petitioner’s representation dt.27.10.2008 filed before the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Therefore, without going into the merits of the contentions raised, it would be suffice to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner expeditiously. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.27.10.2008 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law after giving notice to both sides. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ___________________ (B. Prakash Rao, J) 28.5.2009 bnr