IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10984 of 2010 1. Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Yadav S/O Meghnath Singh Yadav R/O Baban Tolala Tola Ranibag, P.O. Rohtas, P.S. Rohtas, Distt.- Rohtas, Presently Working As Mali On Daily Wages In The Inspection Bungalow, Road Division, Dehri-On-Sone, Distt.- Rohtas Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna-Cum-Convener Of The Committee Of The Secretaries, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 5. The Engineer-In-Chief-Cum-Additional Secretary-Cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 6. The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Bhojpur Road Circle, Ara 7. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Dehri-On-Sone ----------- 2. 14.11.2011 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner moulds his submission. It is submitted that the issue of regularization is distinct from arrears of daily wages for days that the petitioner may have worked. Learned counsel for the State has no objection for a direction to examine the grievances of the petitioner to that extent and grant him appropriate legitimate relief/payment for days that he may have worked, expeditiously preferably within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is next submitted that the impugned order 2 of the three man committee dated 27.11.2008 reveals that the consideration of the petitioner came to be made in the background of certain information which were still awaited and had not been furnished by the department concerned. Leave is therefore sought to withdraw the application for pursuing remedies before the appropriate authority. The Court makes no observation with regard to the same. The writ application is allowed in part with regard to the first claim only. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)