IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.18 of 2008 PARAS PRASAD SONI Versus LAL BABU SAH & ORS ----------- 3 29/9/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court when the petitioner had himself voluntarily chosen to close his evidence but later on realizing that four important sale deeds were required to be exhibited and for that purpose evidence were to be adduced by seeking reopening of his evidence, the court below ought to have allowed such prayer. Accordingly the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is given liberty to produce oral/documentary evidence within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, in which period he must complete his oral and documentary evidence, failing which the court below will proceed further with the case without giving any opportunity to the petitioner. This application is accordingly allowed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar