IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 4344 of 2009. Date of Decision: 19th March, 2009. Satender & Ors. ....Petitioners through Mr. APS Shergill, Advocate Versus State of Haryana & Ors. .Respondents through Mr. R.D.Sharma, Sr. DAG, Haryana. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D.Sharma, learned Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepts notice. In view of the nature of directions proposed to be issued, there is no necessity to seek any counter-affidavit from the respondents. The petitioners are residents of village Katha, Tehsil Khekra, District Bhagpat [Uttar Pradesh]. Their precise grievance is that agricultural land which was originally part of the revenue estate of their village and is owned and possessed by them, has now been transferred to the State of Haryana in terms of 'Dikshit Award, 1974'. According to the petitioners, they have sown the crops, however, they are not being permitted to harvest the same by their counter- parts of the State of Haryana. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any views on merits of the petitioners' claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to verify the petitioners' claim and if found correct, to take immediate remedial steps to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners' life and property. Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. March 19, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE