IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 23821 of 2008 Between: Ragam Shiv Kumar Yadav S/o. Late Augamaiah R/o. H.No.4-1-49, Kowkoor, Hakimpet, Malkajigiri Mandal, Secunderabad - 500 078. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Joint Collector Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Siddipet Medak District. 4 The Tahsildar / M.R.O. Wargal Mandal Medak District. 5 Dr. B. Vidya Sagar Rao S/o. Rama Rao R/o. Cheriyal Village & Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his order dated 18-9-2008 passed under reference No.F3/7236/2008 - F3/50/ROR/2008 and to quash the same holding that as illegal, arbitrary, unjust malaﬁde and against the principles of natural justice, and to consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to dispossess the petitioner's from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's land to the extent of Ac.31-36 guntas in Sy.Nos. 175, 176, 176-A, 177, 178 and 179 of Narsampally Village, Wargal Mandal, Medak District, during the pendency of the revision petition No.F3/50/ROR/2008 before the 2nd respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.31.36 guntas of agricultural land in Sy.Nos.175, 176, 176-A, 177, 178 and 179 of Narsampally Village, Wargal Mandal, Medak District having purchased the same under an agreement of sale-cum-General Power of Attorney dated 31.10.1996. He ﬁled this writ petition questioning the order dated 18.9.2008 passed by the 2nd respondent – Joint Collector, Medak District rejecting the application ﬁled by the petitioner seeking stay of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent – Revenue Divisional Oﬃcer, Siddipet dated 28.8.2008 dismissing the appeal ﬁled by the petitioner against the orders passed by the 4th respondent – Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Oﬃcer, Siddipet mutating the name of the 5th respondent in respect of the subject matter of property in the revenue records. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and the learned counsel for the 5th respondent. Though several contentions have been raised by the learned counsel for the parties with regard to possession as well as the entries made in the revenue records, after arguing for some time, all the learned counsel submitted that it would be suﬃce if a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent –Joint Collector, Medak District to dispose of the revision petition pending before him, which was ﬁled by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’). Accordingly, the 2 nd respondent-Joint Collector, Medak at Sanga Reddy is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal No.F3/50/RoR/08 ﬁled by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act as expeditiously as possible, preferably with a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is dismissed. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.03.11.2008 msv