/ Cmw TT;sGARH) IN TEE EIIGH COURT OE‘ JUDECA’ITJRE AT BIIuA§PI§R{ WRIT FETITxoN m. 33$) o? was Kuher‘srlahu,.sen ~a£\‘B.&.Sahu,aged almut, ‘. 3? ye ans .1 oqcapatian—Acceuntant. ' poated atn70 fiice w£ Assistant , Camissienex.mzcibal ‘Welfaxe, ,Kanker‘ § .. M (c.G.) .M dJtgt‘hd . :9 . . . ‘ PETI‘I’I ONER -q state af Chhattisgarh ,thmaugh secretary, Adim Jat'i‘aand Anusuchit Ja'ti Vikas D.K.s.Bhawan‘.Mantralay,Raipur, District RaipurJmGd $."v* \u'“ 3%? Director, Adm Jati and Awsuchit Jaw. vizéas. Raiyur .Chhattisgarh. Additional Director, Adina Jati and Anusuchit Jati, R‘aipur.chhattisgaxhfa‘ :4. EmakRam Yadav. V ‘vAcaountant .mstecl at Asstt.Ereiect Admin‘ist1:étion.,Q£fiq§r..D,§nt§y§@§ Instr ict «Dantew a§a££€ .é. ), 33h / /’/ WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLES 226/221 OE ‘TPE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. c . i XI—HC—ZZ 95.12.13.693 Shi’i Yog€sh Panda ", cmmsal 8111i P.DaS, Panel Lawyar for Héalri. iicls 22é/ 227 of Constitutien of India id1€ p€tition€r has chedlalged the transfer ordm‘ datéd $1.10.?GG3 by which th€ p€titio1 Kanker to Dailiéwada. ’ T116 petitionm‘ iS workmg 5 Assistaili Adiwas impugimd arder €116 petitiona‘ has The grievancg of ths petitiensr is hiS trailSfey canuat be madfs {3 petitioner’s old parente are residing with him and if the peh’tioner ll not be able to look after hie art of service the petitioner has ; in the Bastar District and. his ‘r' to accommoclate respontlent er of the petitioner ahould be By this wn't petition under A} for the pstitiener. the State. Commis'sionsr, i3 h‘anSf6n‘6i1 to Dagtewada 116 W} pai’asnts, moreover, 1'11 The earlier p‘ already warked more than ten yea§ tmnsfer has beee effeciecK i11 ord{ no.4. Therefore, the trailsfer 0K} quaehed, for the be allowed to reepondent may be directed to < which learned. Panel Lawyer has no Havmg heard il1e leai11ed cot regard to the facta and Cireumstam Lean1ed counsel petitioner may .S Accomtant in the ofnce of Vikaa, ii Kanker and vide been transferred to Dantewada. tthat‘being a Class-III employee ut of District, moreover, the that make a re‘WI‘esentatlon and lonsider his representation to objection. Lnsel for the parties and having tea of the case, the petitioner is petitioner submits the / iv, ier has been transferred from XI-HC~22 é‘JIG‘wed to maks a dataikd rsprwent ithin a paéod of ten dayS fram t p0nd€nt no.2 in tum shag d€c: iitioimr wifhin agather pm‘iml oi Elam‘mr consitiering all his gn'airanca‘ a Et is also dir€ct€d that if t11€ p: ! 3 Ei€J€d ihen he should nat iElie‘ 1%}31‘63a1taf1i011. With this obsavation ami d isp0S€d 9f. Q) m isa staads dispOSed of. ‘ thirty days in $1 objective s with a reason€d orikr. Consequently, MWP. N0. 3053,!2003 (”>5 LA. No.9800/2003 /1 / o ‘rff‘" : r . C€rtifi€d copy as per Ruks. Sdl- L.C.BHAD° Judge {@% W‘ at‘ian raising all his glisvailces )day i0 mspondentjmE and d€ the mpreeeniation of the :titioner has not ah‘eady been eed till ihe decisien Of me irectien, the inetitien stande i g é $