IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32674 of 2011 1. Manoj Sah @ Manoj Kr. Sah, 2. Pappu Sah, both sons of Ram Prakash Sah, 3. Ram Prakash Sah, son of late Janak Sah 4. Niranjan Singh, son of Ram Sogarath Singh, all residents of village – Singhia Khurd, P.S. Samastipur, District – Samastipur ……….. Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ……… O.P. ---------------------------------- 3/ 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the four petitioners in this case apprehend their arrest in Samastipur (Town) P.S. Case no. 637 of 2010 under sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 IPC with the allegation of assault and taking away some cash and kind. Submission is of false implication in retaliation of counter version by way of Samastipur P.S. Case no. 630 of 2010 instituted at the instance of petitioner no. 1 Manoj Sah alias Manoj Kumar Sah. Attention was drawn to paragraph 3 of the case diary supporting the counter version. Objecting the prayer, it is pointed out that on complaints received by the superior authorities, supervision was made by the Superintendent of police and both the cases were found true though on intervention by this Court vide order dated 29.4.2011 in Cr.W.J.C. No. 154 of 2011. Taking into consideration that petitioner no. 3 Ram Prakash Sah alone carries some sort of specific allegation of inflicting injury to the informant, which is reported to be grievous 2 but general and omnibus allegations are levelled against the remaining three petitioners and that all the petitioners bear clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Samastipur in the aforementioned P.S. Case subject to the conditions laid down in section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with additional condition for petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 to attend the court regularly till two years and petitioner no. 3 to attend the court till disposal of the case. In case of failure in appearance on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Anil/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)