IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.20907 of 2009 PAPPU MIAN @ VAKIL, son of Md. Nasim, resident of Milki Mohalla Gurhatti, Gali, P.S. Ara Town district Bhojpur, Ara .. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. Opposite Party **** /3/ 08.10.2009 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 384 and 386 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has stated in paragraph 16 that he was an accused only in one other case, i.e., Ara Town P.S. Case No. 263 of 2005, for the offence of Arms Act and there is no other case thereafter, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 156 of 2008 (T.R. No. 2708 of 2008) to the satisfaction of Sri B.K. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, on the conditions that in case the Magistrate after calling for a report about the petitioner’s antecedent finds that this statement is incorrect, the petitioner will not be 2 released on bail and that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)