:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.28 OF 1994 SECOND APPEAL NO.28 OF 1994 SECOND APPEAL NO.28 OF 1994 M/s.Pore Brothers ..Appellant V/s Shriniwas Ganesh Panditrao & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Mr.Vineet B. Naik for the Appellant. Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. DATE : 16TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 16TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 16TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant tendered a letter dated 18th January, 2006, wherein the learned Advocate had communicated the Appellant about the status of the above Appeal, but there are no instructions at all and the Appellant failed to get in touch with the learned Advocate for the Appellant. The said communication letter was duly received by the Appellant. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Therefore, the learned Advocate for the Appellant is seeking discharge from the above Appeal. In view of the same, Mr.Vineet B. Naik stands discharged from the above Appeal on behalf of the Appellant. 2. None appears for the Appellant, hence the Appeal stands dismissed. :2: (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)