IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16788 of 2011 Date of Decision.08.09.2011 Balbir Singh son of Anup Singh resident of village and Post Office, Majith, Tehsil and District Amritsar through a special Power of Attorney .....Petitioner Versus Union of India through Secretary, Home Affairs, New Delhi and others .....Respondents Present: Mr.Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-6), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by respondent No.3 within a particular time. 2. The legal notice shall be decided by respondent No.3 if the same is represented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the same. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 08, 2011 Pankaj*