IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16407 of 2009 1. RINKI KUMARI W/O VIDYA NAND SAH VILL- RAM TOLA, P.S. SARASI, DISTT. PURNEA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY WELFARE DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BIHAR OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER PURNEA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PURNEA 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER PURNEA 6. DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT ADMINISTRATION AND SELF EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PURNEA 7. THE SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SUBDIVISION DHAMDAHA, DISTT. PURNEA 8. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER PURNEA 9. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DHAMDAHA, DISTT. PURNEA 10. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER DHAMDAHA, DISTT. PURNEA 11. MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SARASI, P.S. SARASI, DISTT. PURNEA 12. NAVEETA KUMARI W/O SHEKHAR YADAV VILL- RAM TOLA, P.S. SARASI, DISTT. PURNEA ----------- 2. 8.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Earlier the Commissioner had set aside the order of the District Magistrate not on merit but only on the ground of non-compliance of the principles of natural justice, when the petitioner was not heard, consequently, the District Magistrate has passed a fresh, reasoned and speaking order on merits. Objection is raised on behalf of the respondents that the petitioner has a remedy before the Commissioner of the Division to challenge the order of the District Magistrate passed on merits. 2 If the petitioner prefers such application before the Commissioner within a period of 30 days from today, let the same be decided by a reasoned and speaking order, after hearing all concerned including respondent no. 12 within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)