IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30937 of 2011 Asgar Mian & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/ 04.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioners are in jail custody since 27.5.2011 in a case registered under sections 323, 324 and 307 of the IPC. Admittedly, petitioners were all along on bail but they misused their privilege of bail resulting cancellation of their bail bonds on 26.9.2006 and subsequently, they were declared absconder. It would appear from the impugned order that the petitioners could be arrested by the police on 27.5.2011. It would further appear from the record that the case is very old and trial could not be concluded on account of non-cooperative approach of the petitioners as well as other accused persons. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners, Asgar Mian and Md Jalil, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge II, Saran at Chapra in Sessions Trial no. 578/1994 arising out of Parsa(Veldi) P.S. Case no. 26/1990 subject to the conditions that petitioners shall ensure their presence before the learned trial court on each and every date for the period of nine months or till conclusion of the trial and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, - 2 - the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. It goes without saying that the trial court shall take all possible steps to conclude the trial of the petitioners within the above stated period even by separating their trial from the trial of other accused persons. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)