IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.5691 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.9.2010 Harish Sharma ….Petitioner Vs. State of HP & others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. AG and Mr. J.S. Rana. Assistant Advocate General. The Writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: 1. That the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to work and the benefits consequential may kindly be granted from the date of termination.’ 2. That the petitioner may kindly be allowed to work as PTA teacher with all consequential benefits from the date of illegal termination as per grant in aid Rules while issuing the writ in the nature of mandamus and further the respondents may kindly be directed to release the grant in aid to the petitioner or any other order which may deem fit be passed in the interest of justice. 1 Whether reporter of local papers are allowed to see the judgment ? It has been fairly submitted before this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present writ petition could be disposed of in the light of the judgment dated 5.5.2010 passed in CWP No. 3864 of 2009 Mohinder Singh Vs. State of HP & ors along with other connected batch of writ petitions. In the absence of otherwise instructions, Sr. Additional Advocate General is not in a position to take a different view. As such, the present writ petition is disposed of in the light of the observations made in the operative part of the judgment above mentioned. In view of the disposal of the present writ petition, all the pending application(s) are also disposed of. Copy Dasti. ( R.B. Misra ), J. ( V.K.Sharma ), J. 13th September, 2008 (sl)