C.R. No. 3748 of 2011 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3748 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: June 2, 2011 Maha Singh …..Petitioner Vs. DHBVNL and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Proxy counsel for Mr.Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff- petitioner has neither been permitted to produce the office order dated May 10, 2000 in evidence nor prayer of the plaintiff for a direction to the defendant to admit the same has been allowed. Whether the defendant- respondents had admitted that the said order had been issued by Haryana State Electricity Board whereas the defendant- respondents were successors of said company. I have gone through the document which is sought to be produced on record. This is merely an office order, seems to have been C.R. No. 3748 of 2011 (O&M) [2] passed during the course of official functioning of Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam with copy to about 12 different branches. Taking into consideration the nature of the document which is sought to be produced, in the interest of justice, it is deemed appropriate that permission should be granted to the plaintiff- petitioner either to produce the document or to tender the same subject to its admissibility and relevance to be determined at final stage subject to payment of cost of ` 2000/-. In view of the above, the impugned order dated May 6, 2011 is hereby set aside. The revision petition is disposed of in limine. The trial Court after permitting the said document to be taken on record can continue with the final disposal of the case on the date fixed for hearing. June 2, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE