IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ~^^^^~^^ CONTEMPT PE^FFTON N0^s^ /2010 •^^^^ a^^ ss'^^- PETITIONERS: ^i^ .*tt-";',.-1 %^-""< ^'-i'...^ ^^••" \^' 1. Smt. Krishna Devi Sharma, Wd/o Late Ram Sharan Sharma, Aged about - 82 years. 2. Ram Manohar Sharma, S/o Late Ram Sharan Sharma. Both are residents of - C/o - Shri Raja Ram Sharma, Devnandan Nagar Phase II, Infront of Vishal Tailors, Baima Road, Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / CONTEMNORS Shri Arun Dev Goutam, Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Beside Sub Registry Office, Bilaspur (CG) Shri Jayant Thorat, Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur (CG) 3. Shri V.K. Mishra, D.S.P. Crime Bilaspur (CG) Branch, CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURTS ACT I-HC-22 ^n^T^T r<riicb ^TT^T 5h^icb ^f^a -^Ef ^|<41d<LI, ^Tl1^JI<o, ^^l^y 3Tlit?T 'q=W (TGV^. c,^cc) ^,^rLy^i o ^•-••••••••••-"•••••--^•^ ^ 1^011 ^Hicb ^^s' ^n^r'^c<r?e;R ^rf^T SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohani beeh 03-01^011 Shri T. R. Dahire, counsel for Heard. This petition has been filed a( 2010 passed by this Court in Cr.M.P.} Learned counsel for the pet| observed that the investigating agerj fairly in making investigation. He furtt also stated before this Court that respondents No.2 & 3 have taken tl| official of the rank of D.S.P. has and further assured the Court that utmost promptness, fairness and petitioners lurther submits that th| respondents would look into the ma< steps and respondent No.6 was utmost promptness and fairness. submits that a detailed representatio^ of Police, however, proper and satisf not being made. In order dated 09-11-2010, this under investigation and at this stage, and a person has already been ar direction to carry out investigation in direction. Though, there were obser the 'chl1L<fd41'rl "qTR^ff ^ 'fe^ i^l^K '^srf^Frw^r Shrivastava. J. t|he petitioners. lleging violation of order dated 09-11- No. 760 of 2010. tioners submits that this Court had |cy would act ditigently, promptly and ber submits that the State counsel had |the senior potice officer particularly ^e matter seriously and senior police made In charge ofthe investigatton matter would be investigated with Idiligence. Learned counsel for the Court further observed that the |ter and if necessary, take necessary to undertake investjgation with 1-earned counsel for the petitioners was made to the Inspector General ^ctory steps towards investigation are dir^cted Court observed that the matter is still ^hen the matter is under investigation fested, this Court cannot issue any |a particular manner or any particular •^ations made by this Court that the ff)v» [^ ^^ XI-HC-22 '^sf ^I^KTI^, ^nl^^Ko, fa^i1H^< sn^r^T ^14) 3T[^T 9h^i<^ ^rf^T Tumane MW^l ^W^ ,.3TT^T "ST^? d^'. G^'s^c) N^ -^Z^I^^ ^.........................^.......^ ^ "^^T' 3:IT^T'^T^R ^lfN —1-- investjgating agency would act pro^ either from the petition or the affida|vit contempt ofthe order passed by thi^ 1 do not find any merit irj dismissed. ^l^t<n<i1'1 'HR^if ^ 'fe^t i^^K ^sri^w^T Tiptly, ditigently and fairly, 1 do not find vit fited along with the petition that any i Court has been committed. this petition. Petition is accordingly Sd/- IVIanindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge r^ ^feq