WP(C) 3046/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Bora learned St ate counsel. The instant applicantion seeking a review of the judgment and order dated 26.07. 2010 rendered in WP(C) No.3096/2010 is sought for on the ground that though rele vant documents demonstrating the Indian citizenship of the petitioner were on re cord at the time of the disposal of the writ proceedings, the same could not be effectively brought to the notice of this Court. In conformity with the above plea, the learned counsel for the petitioner has d rawn the attention of this Court to the photocopy of the certified copy of the v oters’ list of 1965 relatable to 85 No. Raha Assam Legislative Assembly Constitu ency. According to the learned counsel, the name of the petitioner’s father i.e . Noor Jaman appears at Sl. No.256 testifying that he was a voter from Center No .74 of the aforementioned Constituency and thus the decision of the learned Fore igners Tribunal as sustained by this Court that the petitioner was a foreigner i s clearly unsustainable in law and on facts. Even assuming that the name of Noor Jaman as is depicted by the above document i s as a voter of the aforementioned center of the 85 Raha Assam Legislative Assem bly Constituency, there is no contemporaneous official document cognizable in la w with the required probative value to establish that Noor Jaman is the father o f the petitioner. In the above view of the matter, in the opinion of this Court , there is no convincing and persuasive ground to accede to the prayer for revie w or reconsideration of the judgment and order dated 26.07.2010 passed in WP(C) No.3096/2010. This review petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.