... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr Uday P. Warunjikar for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 16, 2006. : MARCH 16, 2006. : MARCH 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Perused the Application. For the reasons mentioned in the Application being sufficient cause, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment to be carried out by the Applicant in the main proceedings in the course of the day. It is further clarified that as newly added Respondent Shri Ashok R. Kamble has been brought on record only by this order and he is yet to be served with show-cause notice, question of issuing bailable warrants in terms of order dated 07th March, 2006 does not arrive. Instead the Applicant is granted liberty to serve the newly added Respondent Shri Ashok R. Kamble. Notice returnable on 04th April, 2006. Application is disposed of in above terms. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE