IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2010 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1931 Tr.P(C).No. 329 of 2009(P) ------------------------------------ [O.P.NO.1066/2009 OF FAMILY COURT,KOLLAM] .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------- 1. P.V.ANU, AGED 26 YEARS, PANAYIL VEEDU, VAYAKKAL P.O., VALAKOM, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM. 2. JAYAKUMARI, AGED 56 YEARS, PANAYIL VEEDU, VAYAKKAL P.O., VALAKOM, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM. 3. MANU.P.V., AGED 23 YEARS, PANAYIL VEEDU, VAYAKKAL P.O., VALAKOM, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. MR.B.CHANDRA LAL. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------- B.ANEESH, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.BHANU, NANDHINI VIHAR, PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KILIKOLLOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADVS. MR.S.SUNIL NARAYANAN, MR.SAJJU.S. THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P. BHAVADASAN, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= T.P.C. No. 329 of 2009 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2010 O R D E R This is a petition filed under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of O.P. No.1066 of 2009 and O.P.(G.W.) No.864 of 2009 pending before the Family Court, Kollam to the Family Court, Kottarakkara. 2. The marriage between the 1st petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 28-3-2004 at Shaw Auditorium, Ambalamkunnu, Kollam. A male child was born in the wedlock and the child is with the 1st petitioner. 3. It appears that the respondent has instituted O.P. No.1066 of 2009 for realization of an amount of Rs.17,81,500/- and O.P. (G.W.) No.864 of 2009 for the custody of the child before the Family Court, Kollam, since difference of opinion arise among the couple. Various TPC 329/09 2 allegations are made in the respective petitions, which need not be narrated herein, in the light of the order that is proposed to be passed. 4. It is stated that 1st petitioner/wife has instituted O.P. No.918 of 2008 before the Family Court, Kottarakkara and also stated that the respondent has in fact instituted O.P. No.892 of 2002 before the same court. The result is that two petitions are pending before the Family Court, Kollam and two other petitions are pending before the Family Court, Kottarakkara. According to the 1st petitioner/wife, the continuance of the case at Family Court, Kollam will cause considerable inconvenience to her, and there is no inconvenience for the respondent to attend the Family Court at Kottarakkara, especially when the petition filed by him is pending before that court. 5. In the light of the facts narrated above, it is only just and proper that relief be granted to the petitioners. 6. In the result, this petition is allowed and O.P. No.1066 of 2009 and O.P.(G.W.) No.864 of 2009 pending TPC 329/09 3 before the Family Court, Kollam is transferred to the Family Court, Kottarakkara. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. mn.