Civil Revision No. 7653 of 2011 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7653 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 12th, 2011 Mrs. Anishya Hardas .... Petitioner Versus Hardeep Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. VIJENDER SINGH MALIK, J. Mrs. Anishya Hardas, the plaintiff, has brought this revision petition under the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ajnala for expeditious disposal of civil suit No. 85 of 2010 titled Mrs. Anishya Hardas Vs. Hardeep Singh etc. I have heard Mr. Baldev Raj Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record carefully. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and the decision of the suit is being delayed by learned trial court. I cannot agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner for various reasons. Firstly, the suit is of the year 2010 and it is not even Civil Revision No. 7653 of 2011 2 .. an old civil suit. Secondly, learned trial court framed the issues on 15.10.2010 and had even recorded and completed the evidence of the plaintiff on 9.11.2011. It does not appear that learned trial court is delaying the proceedings of the suit in any manner or is not taking interest in disposal of the suit for any reason. In these circumstances, I do not find any reason for issuing any direction in the suit to learned trial court for expeditious disposal thereof. The revision petition is, consequently, dismissed. (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) JUDGE December 12th, 2011 som