IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL No. 359 OF 2004 Mahadeo R. Shinde APPELLANT Vs. Shantabai D. Patil & Ors. RESPONDENTS Mr. R. V. More, Advocate for Appellant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. J. J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 11, 2006. : JULY 11, 2006. : JULY 11, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for Appellant. Perused the Trial Court’s Judgment as well as judgment of lower Appellate Court. Both the Courts have categorically held that the Appellant had failed to prove that Respondent No.1 Shantabai was not his legally wedded wife and also that Respondent No.2 Suresh was not his son. Both the Courts below have given concurrent finding against the Appellant. There is no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]