IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 230 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- NISHA P.M., D/O. NASEEMA, AGED 19 YEARS, C/O.GEORGE, EDAPPAT HOUSE, ADIYAKKAL THAZHAM ROAD, AMBADIMALA, THIRUVANKULAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY - 688531. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TRIPUNITHURA POLICE STATION-682314. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASARGODE-671314. 5. MAJEED, ERUTHUMKADAVU HOUSE, MUTTATHODI P.O., KASARAGOD-671321. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI C M KAMAPPU FOR R1-4 ADV. SRI.K.V.SOHAN FOR R5 SMT.SREEJA SOHAN.K. FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No. 230 of 2011 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph J., The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of the alleged detenu, by name Muhammed K. The allegation of detention is made against the fifth respondent. 2. Briefly put the case of the petitioner is as follows. The petitioner is aged 19 years. According to her, she decided to marry Sri.Muhammed K, the alleged detenu and they applied to the Sub Registrar, Njarakkal, Ernakulam and the receipt was issued, which is produced as Ext.P1. The petitioner's parents contracted inter- caste marriage. Presumably because of this, the detenu's family was not in favour of the marriage. The petitioner alleges that the W.P.(Crl.) No. 230 of 2011 :2: detenu is detained by the fifth respondent. 3. Today the alleged detenu was present. The petitioner, fifth respondent and the mother of the petitioner were also present. We interacted with all of them. 4. The alleged detenu would say that he is not under any illegal detention, as alleged and he does not want to marry the petitioner. 5. We are not satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case of illegal detention as alleged. In these circumstances, we close this Writ Petition. This will be without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach any other forum in accordance with law. K.M.JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/