IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3515 of 2007 Kumar Gyan Ranjan Ambedkar son of Sri Indraneet Paswan, resident of Village-Oob, Police Station-Obra, District- Aurangabad ----------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar. 3. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar. 4. The Examination Controller, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar. 5. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Delhi. 6. Bar Council of India, New Delhi. 7. The Principal, Nawada Vidhi, Maha Vidyalaya, Nawada 8. The Bihar State Bar Council, Patna through its Secretary ---------- Respondents. ---------- 15. 31.3.2009 Heard Mr. Basant Choudhary for the petitioner, Mr. Vivekanand Kumar for the University, Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha for respondent no.5, and Mr. Ram Shankar Prasad for respondent no. 6. This writ petitioner has been preferred for a direction to the respondent authorities to control the affairs of Nawada Vidhi Maha Vidyalaya, Nawada, and to take appropriate action against Mr. D.N. Mishra, the Principal of the College, for engaging himself in illegal acts with respect to the affairs of the College. The respondents have placed on record their counter affidavit. It appears to us that the Chancellor of the University had directed enquiry into the affairs of the College. The committee submitted its report dated 23.7.2001 (Annexure-3), on a perusal of which it appears that the Principal of the College had been conducting the affairs of the College in an irregular manner. Respondent no.2 has placed 2 on record his counter affidavit wherein it is stated that the petitioner is a mere busy-body and has no Locus Standi to maintain this writ petition. It is further stated that recognition of law college is granted by the Bar Council of India and recognition has been granted to the present College. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct respondent no.2 to examine the report dated 23.7.2001 (Annexure-3), and take remedial measures. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)