-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.768 OF 2004 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.230 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant Vs. Nitin Chandrakant Shinde ..Respondents ... Mr.U.V.Nikam A.P.P. for Applicant Mr.Vilas N.Mali for Respondent ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned A.P.P. for the State and learned advocate for respondent. 2. The State is seeking condonation of delay caused in filing Appeal. Mr.Mali states that delay may not be condoned. However, in my opinion, sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal. Hence, delay is condoned. Application is disposed of. Appeal to be fixed for admission on 5.12.2005. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]