IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.279 of 2011 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 2705/2009) DEODUTTA PANDEY, SON OF LATE RADH GOBIND PANDEY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NAYKA TOLA, WARD NO. 6, P.O. AND P.S. SUGAULI, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN. …….PETITIONER. Versus 1. SAROJ SHRIVASTAVA, WIFE OF SHRI UMESH CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – AGARWA, P.S. MOTIHARI TOWN, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN 2. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 3. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, BUDHA MARG, PATNA. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (SECONDARY EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BUDHA MARG, PATNA. 6. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI. …..RESPONDENTS. For the petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Jha, Advocate. Mr. Shivjee Pandey, Advocate. For the respondent-State : Mr. Abinash Kumar, A.C. to G.A. 10. ---------- 04/ 16.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-State. This petition has been filed for review of order dated 15.07.2011 by which a bench of this Court allowed CWJC No.2705 of 2009 filed by respondent no.1 of this review petition. The matter was with regard to inter se seniority between the writ petitioner and the review petitioner, who was respondent no.7 in the writ petition after the death of permanent Headmaster of the Deen - 2 - Dayal Project Girls High School, Sugauli. It is apparent from the said order that despite proper service of notice respondent no.7 of the writ petition, who is petitioner in this review petition, did not choose to appear in the case and counsel of the State of Bihar and its authorities was heard and counter affidavit filed by them was considered. This Court does not find any error apparent on the face of record, nor does it find any material to take a different view. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Sunil ( S. N. Hussain, J.)