IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 31ST BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 25143 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. BALASEKHAR,S/O.R.SOMASUNDARAM,AGED 47 YEARS,VANIYAR STREET,KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. KARTHIKEYAN,S/O.BALASUBRAMANIAN,6/97, CHETTIYARTHOTTAM,RANGASAMUDRAM,PALLADAM TALUK, TIRUPUR, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT COCHIN, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. -682001 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.-682101 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALUVA EAST POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 682101 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 25143 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.23.6.2011 OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA P2: TRUE COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE NO.TN33-AL-5303 P3; TRUE COPY OF THE NATIONAL PERMIT FOR VEHICLE NO.TN33-AL-5303 P4: TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICES AND DELIVERY NOTE P5: TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. IN CRIME NO.2179/2011 OF THE ALUVA POLICE STATION. P6: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.18.8.11 IN WPC NO.22479/11 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P7: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.25.8.11 OF THE COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER, CHITTUR ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P8: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 13.9.11 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIBITS : NIL //True copy// PA to Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 25143 of 2011 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of September , 2011. JUDGMENT Challenge in the writ petition is against Exhibit P8 order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate exercising his powers under Section 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. This order is amenable to revision before the District Collector under Section 23 B of the Act. Having regard to the above facts, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the petitioners contentions and rights to move revision and it is directed that if revision is filed the same will be disposed of as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rkc //True copy// PA to Judge