IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7378 OF 2008 Sayyed Talish Sadan Ali & Ors. .... Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil i/by Sagar Kasar for the petitioners. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP., for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 19th NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C. . By our order dated 15th October, 2008 we had directed the respondents to take remedial measures agaisnt encroachments and unauthorised constructions. We had also made it clear that during the pendency of the matter in this Court by way of PIL, thre would be no impediment for the MPCB i.e. Respondent no. 16 and 10 in the two writ petitons from taking legal action against the defaulters. 2. It appears that pursuant to our said order, the respondents have issued notices under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to the alleged encroachers calling upon them to remove the encroachments failing which the said incroachments will be removed by the respondents. This petitoin is filed by the 23 petitioners impugning the said notices received by them on the ground that their structures are authorised and that their structures canot be demolished without following due process of law. In view of the notices impugned herein, it is clear that the authorities are following due process of law. In any event, if the petitioners have any grievance, they ought to approach the competent authority who has isued notices which authority can consider their individual cases and thereafter take action in accordance with law. 3. With the above observations, the petition stands dismissed. (J.N. PATEL, J.) (S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.)