raga; r HIGH 60URT éF CHHATTISG§RH ‘AT EILASPUR Cr, WP. No.2CE o? 2mg APPLECANR 1. Jamak Ram, aged abeut 5O years, Sio. (m Jam Kunwar Singh 2. Rikhi Ram, aged about 35 yearS, 5/0. Kunwar $ingh Bath ressiiiing at Viikage Tengangarh PaHce Stat§m & Tehsil Pathariya Di3trict Biia5pur (C.G.) vs. Non-§gg!icani State of Chhatti$garh Through Pelice Station: Pathariya Distt. Bilasmir. C.G. Pa’esent Shfi Vegeshwar Sharma, ccunsef far ihe applicants. Smi. Madhu NiSha Singh, Pam! Lawyer for the Estate. $ing!e Bench: How’bie Shri Bhirendra Mishra‘ J O P. A L Q R D E R (30.03201 O) ’i. The applisants have fifeci ihiS appiication uncle." Sectien 482 cf Cr. RC. as: in the bai! ordev afateci G3032G10 in Misc. Cri Case No.281i2a1 G, father‘s name 0f the app!icant$ has been wrangly mentiehed as Kapa? Siiigh, whereas as pér the ¢hargashéet name 6f the applicant§ father i3 Kumvar Singh. We error crept in i$ mantinned by {ha apmicants ihermelves mentiening that theif father’s Hams m3 been wrengly mentioned a5 Kepm Singh. [\J that she has no objection it the arder sheet detect 0&6320ta eassee‘ in \ Mise. Cri. Case No.28‘i/201C3 ie corrected. the name et‘ the appiicente‘ father be substitutett a3 Kunwer Singi‘t in the Learned counsel for the State, after gem} through the case diary, eubmtts piece ot Kapet Singn. Aceereingly, the eppiicatien is etioweti. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge M