IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No. 135 of 2010.. Date of Decision : 23rd November, 2011. _________________________________________________________ Shri Bali Ram son of Shri Khiali Ram, resident of Village Kannar, Tehsil Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P. ……Petitioner-appellant. . Versus 1. The Sub Divisional Officer (C) exercising the Powers of Collector Sub Division Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P. 2. Shri Bidhi Chand, 3. Shri Jagar Nath, Both sons of Sh .Khiali Ram, residents of Village Kannar, Tehsil Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P. ….Respondents. Petition under Section 227 of the Constitution of India. _________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. _____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. J.R. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. A.G. for respondent No.1. Respondents No.2 and 3 ex-parte. ______________________________________________________________ Dev Darshan, J. (oral) This petition has been filed against the order of the learned Sub division Officer dismissing the appeal instituted by Shri Bali Ram, who is petitioner herein. 2. The petitioner challenged the orders of the Gram Panchyat, Kathiana. The dispute related to the permission granted to the respective parties for the construction of the house of the respondent. The Sub Divisional Officer found as a fact from the record that the petitioner herein had filed an application before the Gram Panchayat seeking permission to construct the house. Three members of the Gram 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Panchayat had given permission for construction of the house in the presence of the parties and the villagers on 14.11.2000. In these circumstances, he did not find any illegality in the order. He also held that the petition was time barred. I find from the record that when the permission was granted, on the factual aspect and in the presence of the parties, there is no scope for interference in order passed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to the costs. 3. All the pending applications also stand disposed of. 23rd November, 2011. (Dev Darshan Sud), (jai) Judge