IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.818 of 2010 MAHAKANT PRASAD RAMAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kr, Adv. Mr. Binod Kr. Sinha, Adv. For the State:- G.P.-13 ------------ 3. 30.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Despite the writ petition having been filed on 13.1.2010 after serving two copies in the office of the Advocate General in accordance with the High Court rules, the second copy for the benefit of the official respondents in expeditiously filing of the counter affidavit, and grant of adjournment for that purpose on 1.7.2010, no counter affidavit has been filed. Prayer is made for further adjournment which the Court declines. The respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.12.2009 for grant of first and Second time bound promotion and disposed it off by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Since the matter appears purely an administrative issue at this stage it is expected that 2 if the respondents find justification in the claim or any part of the claim, consequential orders shall be passed within the same period without requiring the petitioner to have to approach this Court again for enforcement of that part of the relief when the matter may be viewed seriously by this Court. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)