IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32157 of 2010 SUSHIL KUMAR, SON OF RAM BAHADUR RAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 8.2.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 3120 of 2010 considering the commercial quantity of Ganja having been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Pursuant to the order dated 2.2.2011, the FSL report received with regard to the samples and it is in the opinion of the FSL, that the seized article was “Ganja”. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is rejected. The report of the FSL may be immediately communicated to the court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, West Champaran, Bettiah, in Tr. No. 35 of 2009 arising out of Bairiya P.S. Case No. 160 of 2009 for its use during trial after retaining its photo copy. The Trial Court is directed to send a list of witnesses fixing specific dates to the Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran, and the Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran, is directed to ensure production of those witnesses on the dates they are required to be present by the 2 Trial Court. Let this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran, in Bairiya P.S. Case No. 160 of 2009 (Tr. No. 35 of 2009) through FAX. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)