:®° ®5N 1 ttotfa Banch m THE HIOH COFRT OP CiIHA'mSGARH AT miASPUR Reyfew Petitioa No. 5^^ /2011 {Arisii^oiat<iforder dated 15.^11 passed m W.P.^27) No.2991/11 passedbsrtfeistfeii^IeCoiaTt]! PetiticMner : ^ iillix Benedict S/<5 SIiri SJBenedict, €4years R/o R^ ^shore N^ai^ Bi&spur, Distt. Bilaspur-(C.G.) Versiis .. ^ 1. ^.^%'<\v ^••y.y^' 2. ^^ ^>y^ StateofCIiiiattK%artiy Thxma^i- %e CoIIector, Btlas^ur, Distt. BIIaspiiT-^C.G.) Mmaic^p^ Gorpca'aticm, Tfaroi^i - Co^imisstoier, Mtemcipal CcH-pCM^fioii^ ¥ifeas ^iawaii, BiIas|mr-(C«G^ •K'^'^il ^P^LICATTON FOR RSVIE^r OF QRDS^ DA' D O^^iQ PSSSED INW.K 'm^raor/ i7 •^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review Petition No. 51 of 2011 ^ PETITIONER Filix Benedict Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattlsgarh & another fApDlication for review of order dated 15.06.2011 passed in WP {227) No, _2991 /11) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Aaan^al, J.) Present : Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri GD Waswani, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon18.C8.2011) 1. By this review petition, the petitioner seeks revlew of the order dated 15.06.2011, passed in WP (227) No. 2991/11 (Filix Benedict v. State of Chhattisgarh& anther). 2. Shri Prafull Bharat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that prayer of the petitioner jn W.P. (227) No. 2991/11 was that he wants to fite fresh application under Order 21 Ruie 32 of CPC before the executing court mentioning therein suit land as Khasra No. 198/30 in place of 198/86 exptaining that Khasra No. 198/86 is a part of Khasra No. 198/30. He further submits that word 'explaining that Khasra No. 198/86 is a part of Khasra No. 198/30' has been omitted in the order passed in W.P. (227) No. 2991/11, which may kindly be added in the order. 3. On due consideration, the review petition is allowed and above order dated 15.06.2011 passed in W.P. (227) No. ;f*' " '% i 'my9% i ^.. ^.// 2991/11 is modified to the above extent and now liberty Is granted to the review petltioner to fite fresh applicatjon under Order 21 Rule 32 of CPC before the executing court mentioning therein suit iand as Khasra No. 198/30 in place of 198/86 after explaining that Khasra No. 198/86 i's a part of KhasraNo. 198/30. 4. No order as to costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judgc Sahu