IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4614 of 2009 M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD& ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Mrigank Mauli,Advocate For B.S.E.B.: Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh,Advocate --- 2. 13.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the change of category of service from N.D.S. to H.T. after inspection was made of the petitioner’s premises and the connected load was found to be 63 K.W. as against a sanctioned load of 59 K.W. on 16.2.2007 and, accordingly, the authorities of the Board have raised further bills treating the case of the petitioner that it comes under the H.T. category. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to satisfy this Court that there is any error in the inspection report regarding the calculation of the connected load. In the said circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be filing an application before the authorities of the Board for reduction of the load after removing certain appliances, etc. so as to bring his connection within the earlier sanctioned load of 59 K.W. The writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an application for reduction of his connected load on removing certain of his appliances, etc. In case, an application is filed, the authorities of the Board shall consider and dispose of the same within a period of four weeks 2 from the date of receipt of the said application in accordance with the prescribed procedure including the making of a fresh inspection for verifying the reduced load. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)