IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23167 of 2008 RAJEEV ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Informant Ram Kumari Devi found her daughter Geeta Kumari missing when she woke up in the morning on 5.11.2007 she was aged about 16 to 17 years. In course of search another daughter of the informant disclosed that she was seen talking with Shivam Kumar aged about 10 years. When Shivam Kumar was interrogated it came out that Kanhaiya Rai had asked him to say Gita Kumari that Maula Rai and Haridarshan Rai had called her at Dhala. Geeta Kumari was also searched but she was not found at the home of Kanhaiya Rai who was caught hold of and he revealed that Haridarshan Rai asked him to convey Geeta Kumari that Maula Rai and Haridarshan Rai had come with articles and Geeta Kumari reached at the Dhala through Bandh and from there Haridarshan Rai took her away on his motor cycle. Submission is that the allegation against this petitioner and Tulu Rai is identical and Tulu Rai has been granted bail on 5.08.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, Rajeev Roy is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 114 of 2007. Kundan (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) - 2 -