w. P. No. L8B OF gnnig/ .-‘ «MW? A PETITIONER /\, 3W” VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others.Through: Secretary Home D.K‘ S. Bhawan,Raipur. Collector, Ambikapur, Sarguja (C.G.) Superintendent of Police,— Ambikapur, Distt—Sarguja (C.G.). , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE THE OF PROHIBITION AND OTHER DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS CERTIORARI MANDAMUS UITABLE WRIT OR WRITS RDER OR 0RDFR§ a“k CD C.G.College of Alternative Medicines Jail Road Bapu . Para, Ambikapur Through: Its Director S.N.Gupta S/o Late Sri D.P.Gupta Age 65 Years, R/o Jail Road, Bapu Para, Ambikapur. / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR {CHHATISGARH} S ‘ O 13.07-2004 _ Shxi Abhishek Sinha, coun sel for the petitioner. Shri Pravccn Das, Panal respomknts no 1 to 3,! State 1a m whlch he sought The pennoner has preferred this writ petition linden Artieie 226 85 227 of the Constmmon of Inc that the respondents bé direcfbd over by the respondents. registration, affiliation etc. taken The case of the pennaner xgegxstered by the altematxve I mvolved 1n unpartmg education On 2 1 I O4] "OO3 respondent no takes noticc on behalf of Lawyer mlief to deliver back to the peutionerrthe Original document, records, pertaining to adnlissiou of student fees, s that the petitioner] organization is iiedical Counsel, Calcutta and is m alternative system and medicine. 2 and other Police Ofocers came to / the institution and unauthonzedly without following the procedure laid down by the law, seized the entne documents pertaining to the admission of students, fees reco register etc., in original, without Thereafter, registration and whole paper, givmg a copy of the seizure, memo Additional Collecto r, issued notice to: Ambikapur petitioner and enquired into tie matter and it is leaint by the petitiotler that the Eek has been closed. Even then in spite of respondents No. 2 and 3 axe not repeated requests and reminders, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a detailei repiesentation to xespondent n02 for returning his documents and respondent no 2 be (inected to A ?& xeturnjng the original documents. w ?,Do‘\§)3/0H mm “i 2 E = mm f’ ” mmmm¢gt€tm WW mm mm §5§§ ' ainammmg§gmaEm'- ; -mmmmm‘ roL_ WW &Q§W émfananém decide tbs same and give his 1 lecision an the representation within a period of thirty days to which liearned State counsel has no objection. Having heard learned c regard to the facts and circm allowed to make a detailed rep; all his gn‘evances within a pen' respondent No.2, after consid petitioner, shall decide the sai Vorder on the said representat days from the date of the recei t in accordance with the law. With the above direction: Consequently, I.A. No. 42 Certiiied copy as per rule ‘ounsel for the petitioner and having nstances of the case, the petitioner is .“esentation to respondent No.2, ral’suig 0d of ten days hum today and in turn, Bring all the grievances raised by the i representation and paSs-appropriate don within a petiod of another thirty pt of the same in an objective manner r, the petition stands disposed of. 80/ 2004 stands disposed of. $ $Ri S. sdl- ‘\ Bhad°° t i L.c. Judge