THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P.No. 1322 of 2010 O R D E R: This Civil revision Petition is directed against the order dated 05.10.2009 in I.A. No. 553 of 2009 in O.S. No. 186 of 2008, on the file of the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. The 1st petitioner herein filed the above-said suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale, directing the respondents herein to execute a sale deed in her favour in respect of the suit schedule property. The petitioners filed I.A. No. 553 of 2009 therein, under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, for sending the agreement of sale, dated 16.09.1986 executed in favour of the 1st petitioner and the alleged registered sale deed dated 11.12.1995, executed in favour of the 6th respondent, for comparison of the signatures and for the opinion of expert. The learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendra Nagar dismissed the said Application, on the ground that the petitioners have failed to make out a case to send the documents in question for expert’s opinion. Hence, this Revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. If the grievance of the petitioners is that Respondents 1 to 5 have executed the sale deed in favour of Respondent No.6 on 11.12.1995 in respect of the same property, they have to prove their case by producing oral and documentary evidence. Admittedly, it is not the contention of the petitioners that the sale deed, dated 11.12.1995 is a fabricated one. Therefore, the question of comparing the signatures of Respondents 1 to 5 on the documents in question, does not arise. In that view of the matter, I do not find any illegality in the order under revision. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. --------------------- (N.V. RAMANA, J) 12th April 2010 ksld