1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1367/2011 (Vatsalabai Baban Madavi VERSUS Baburao Lahanu Upare & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.S. Kurekar, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 18 , 2011 . Heard. The only ground raised by the petitioner that the petitioner was not permitted to speak at the meeting in which the No Confidence Motion moved against the petitioner was put to vote, appears to be incorrect on the perusal of the impugned order as also the proceedings of the meeting as the petitioner immediately left the place of meeting as soon as the No Confidence Motion was put to vote. The authorities, therefore, rightly observed that the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that she was not permitted to participate in the meeting was incorrect. Moreover, all the members present in the meeting voted in favour of the Motion when the petitioner left the place of meeting by informing that she wished to vote against the motion. Since there is no error in the orders passed by the authorities, they call for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE