17 % 28.7.2009 Present: None for the petitioner despite second call. Mr. B. K. Saini, Advocate for the respondent. + Cr1. M.B. No.599/2008 & Cr!. Rev. P. No. 242/2008 It is already 3:50 p.m. This is a revision petition filed by the petitioner against an order dated 31st January, 2008 passed by the learned Additional V Sessions Judge, New Delhi in appeal No. 26/2007. By the impugned order the conviction of the petitioner for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was upheld. The learned trial Court had directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.2,37, 115/- i.e. the cheque amount by way of compensation to the complainant and in default of payment of the same the petitioner was directed to undergo a sentence of simple imprisonment of one year and in addition to this, the petitioner was also admonished. The learned Additional Sessions Judge had upheld the sentence and specifically observed that the petitioner had been let off very leniently. I have gone through the impugned judgment. I do not find that there is any illegality, impropriety or incorrectness in the impugned order and accordingly the revision petition is dismissed. The petitioner is granted four weeks' time from the despatch of the order to make the payment to the respondent of Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified • 2 1- an amount of Rs.2,37,115/- and file an affidavit about the fact that the said payment has been made within the period stipulated failing which the Registry shall issue non-bailable warrants for detention of the petitioner for a period of one year as ordered by the learned Trial Court and withheld by the Appellate Court. A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner as well as his counsel free of cost so that the same is complied with. With this observation, the revision petition stands disposed of. V.K. SHALl, J. JULY28, 2009 sv