IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 3765 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.09.2011 Haryana Urban Development Authority through its Estate Offier, Panchkula. ...Appellant versus Ashok Kumar and another ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Nemo for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajesh Garg, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the State. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, instead of arguing the matter, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant appeal, on the ground that since State of Haryana has already challenged the impugned judgment, by means of separate appeal so appellant would assist the State counsel in that matter. In this view of the matter, the present appeal is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. September 12, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k. Judge