IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1881 of 2010 PRAKASH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 9/4/2010 This case has been listed under the heading ‘to be mentioned, at the instance of counsel for the petitioner, who points out that in absence of Complaint Case No. 367 of 2008 the court below is finding difficulty to comply with the order of this Court. This Court would not like to make any comment on such statement, but then it was absolutely elementary for any one to appreciate that such order was passed in relation to the order of the learned Sessions Judge dated 30.11.2009 disposing of Anticipatory Bail Application no.2801 of 2009 with reference to Complaint Case No.367 of 2008 and therefore any thing said in the order dated 22.2.2010 was obviously referable to the said Complaint Case No.367 of 2008. Let the court below now comply the order passed by this Court on 22.2.2010 in the light of the facts stated above. Considering that the period of surrender has already expired, this Court would extend the time limit given in the order dated 22.2.2010 by another period of four weeks. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)