IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: CWP No.18117 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: October 20, 2008 KULBIR SINGH & ANR. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA. PRESENT: MR. R.K. ARORA, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) The petitioners are aggrieved by the appointment of respondent Nos.4 & 5 on the post of ETT Teachers. Learned counsel submits that petitioner No.1 had secured 45.236% marks and petitioner No.2 had secured 51.700% marks whereas, respondent Nos.4 & 5 have secured 41.518% and 42.08% marks respectively. Learned counsel contends that as the petitioners have secured more marks than respondent Nos.4 & 5, hence they be appointed and the appointments of respondent Nos.4 & 5 be quashed. For the aforementioned relief the petitioners have also served a notice (Annexure P-11) upon the respondents which has not been decided so far. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to decide the notice (Annexure P-11) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE October 20, 2008 (RAJAN GUPTA) Gulati JUDGE