1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5329 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.9619 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra .... Applicant VERSUS Maruti S/o Babu Sonsale ... Respondent ..... Shri D.V. Tele, AGP for applicant. Nobody appear for non applicant in spite of service. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : December, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Perused. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2 The applicant has preferred the present application for condonation of delay of 930 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal, challenging the judgment and award dated 31-08-2004 passed by learned 6th Adhoc Additional Distrtict Judge, Beed in L.A.R. No. 198 of 1996. 2 3 On perusal of the averments in the present application and after considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the applicant, it appears that the applicant has explained the reasons for delay caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal in para no. 2 thereof satisfactorily. Hence it appears that the delay occurred in filing the accompanying First Appeal is not deliberate, willful or intentional and, therefore, same is required to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘’B” thereof and delay of 930 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal stands condoned. Accompanying First Appeal be registered and numbered accordingly, and present application stands disposed of. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) SDM* CA5329.07