IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44337 of 2008 SK. ARROZ ALAM @ SUGGA @ AFROZ ALAM … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Sanjeev Kr.No.1 For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. - - - - 2. 23.10.2008 Heard both the sides. The earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on merits in Cr.Misc. No. 38117 of 2007. The order on second petition, in fact, was not the rejection but a direction was given to the petitioner to approach the lower court. The Fast Tract Court IV, Bettiah, has noted down in its order that the case was lying in a vacant court and that was received by him in July, 2008. Three witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case but the parents of the deceased were yet to be examined. This case is under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and the allegation is of committing the murder of Rubi Khatoon for dowry by poisoning her. The parents could be the important witnesses. The prayer for bail was earlier dismissed on merits. I do not see any 2 reason to reconsider the earlier rejection order. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)