IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7037 of 2010 VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE RAMKITARATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDA, P.S. SIKARHATTA, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE EMPLOYEES'PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, R. BLOCK, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL EMPLOYEES’ PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, R. BLOCK, PATNA 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD. REG. OFFICE TAMRA BHAWAN-1, ASHUTOSH CHOUDHARY AVENUE, KOLKATA-19 ----------- 2 23.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.S. Pradhan, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 ,2 & 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that although he is receiving the pension, however the pension which he is receiving is lesser by an amount of Rs. 80/- which has not been considered by the respondent-Employees Provident Fund Organization despite representation as contained in Annexure-7. Mr. Pradhan, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had earlier represented the matter, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)