IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7813 of 2009 NEPALI DOME Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.51521 of 2008 BANGALI @ MUKTI SARKAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.7452 of 2009 SONU KEWAT @ SONU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.21234 of 2009 FEKU DOME Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.21268 of 2009 SUNIL DOME Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 17.6.2009 All these cases arise out of the same police station and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are accused in a case under section 395 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and their names figured in the confessional statement of co-accused and from their possession a torch of Santosh company has been recovered. He further submits that though there is an allegation that a torch was stolen but it is no where specifically stated that the same is made of Santosh company. He further submits that the co-accused Ajit Kumar and Vikram Sah 2 KHAN from whose possession the alleged looted articles have been recovered have been granted bail by a bench of this court by order dated 2.3.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.No.49971 of 2008. It is submitted that prior to this occurrence, only one case of Arms Act against petitioners Nepali Dome and Sonu Kewat were instituted. Considering the nature of allegations, the petitioners Nepali Dome, Bangali @ Mukti Sarkar, Sonu Kewat @ Sonu Kumar, Feku Dome and Sunil Dome are directed to be released on bail in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No.226 of 2008 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Patna City, Patna. (S.P.Singh,J)