IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9316 of 2008 Decided on 9.3.2011 Gorakh Singh ……….Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C & another ...….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Counsel for the respondents has placed on record a copy of the supplementary affidavit . In view of the contents of the affidavit, the present petition does not survive. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructous, so also the pending application(s), if any. Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 9, 2011 (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.