FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.322 OF 2008 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.S.M.Railkar, for the petitioners. CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. DATED: 03.03.2008 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition is directed against the orders passed by the courts below in the proceedings arising from Exhibit-5 application filed by the respondent-plaintiff by which the application at Exhibit-5 has been allowed and the petitioners are restrained from disturbing her possession in the suit properties. I perused both the judgments of the courts below and the other material placed before me. The appellate court in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the judgment has considered the rival contentions of the parties and has observed that the suit fields were in personal cultivation of the deceased Laxman,the father-in-law of the respondent- plaintiff, and has thereby confirmed the findings recorded by the trial Court. Considering that there are concurrent findings of the courts below and as I find sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering the extremely limited jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to disturb the findings of fact, in my opinion, this writ petition deserves to be rejected. Order accordingly. The trial court, however, shall decide the suit without being influenced by the observations made in the impugned orders, expeditiously. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)