1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SECOND APPEAL NO.245/2007 Kashinath Dhondiba Phuge and others. ..Appellants -VERSUS- Anandram Tarachand Bhatewara and others. ..Respondents ......... Mr.P.B.Shah, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.T.D.Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent No.1. .......... CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 17th MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. The present Second Appeal questions the correctness of the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Pune in Civil Appeal No.563/1990. The parties to the appeal have filed the minutes of the order agreeing for setting aside the impugned judgment and decree and for remand of the matter for rehearing to the District Judge, Pune. The remand is for the purpose of having the land measured by the T.I.L.R. and for a fresh hearing of the matter in the light of the report to be submitted by the T.I.L.R., in accordance with law. Hence, the joint minutes of the order are placed on record which 2 are marked as “X” for identification. The minutes of the order are signed by the respective Advocates appearing for the parties to the appeal. 2. In the result, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the minutes of the order. Having regard to the fact that the parties are litigating the dispute since 1976, I hope and trust that the District Judge would expeditiously decide the appeal after the remand. 3. The Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the minutes of the order. JUDGE