._J ¥- HtGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. 4637 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Phanibhushan Saha, S/o Amulya Saha, Aged about 47 years, Presently posted and working as Gramin Krishi Vistar Adhikari, Block Koilibeda, District Kanker (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Building, Mantrataya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Under Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarhj Appearance: Shri B.D. GUN, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, Govt. Advocate for the State on Advance copy. ORAL ORDER (13.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. The petitioner, who is presently woridng on the post of Gramin Krishi Vistar Adh'kari, Koilibeda, District Kanter (wrongly mentioned as Block Phakanjur, as stated by leamed counsel for the petitioner), has been transferred from the said place to the office of VarishtKrishi Vikas Acthikari, Pratappur, District Sarguja on adminlstrative grounds. Leamed counsel for the peUtioner argues that the petitioner is working in Scheduled District, therefore, he should not have been transferred/relieved, unless another person comes in piace of the petitioner. He also argues that many posts are lying vacant in the same Block but the petitioner has been chosen to be transferred to EMstrict Sarguja. Needless to say that these are not Uie grounds for interfering in the order of the transfer by a Court of law. Transfer is an exigency of service, who should be posted where is completety on the dlscretion of the employer and no person working on a transferabte post can claim for his posting at a particular place. It has been settled in many cases W.P.(S) No. 4637 of2007 f\A vatti that the transfer order canbe interfered by a Court of law only when Uie same is vitiated by malafides or extraneous consideration or is effected in violation of any statutory Rules or the Act. Having heard learned counsel for the peUtioner, having gone through the contents of the writ petition, 1 am not inclined to admit ttiis petition for issuance of any writ on the grounds pressed by the leamed counsel for the petitloner. No case is made out for interfering in the transfer order. The petition has no merits and the same is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sdf- SunilKumar Sinha Judge ^-jT/^/oy- :y>^-" ---= I.S '"-^.