o--^ ttfT^. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) No. ^6^_ / 2010 PETITIONER ^" RESPONDENTS G.D.KADA S/o Late Shri.Nathop Ram Kada, Aged about 63 Years, Retd. Assistant Director oflndustries, O/o Directorate ofIndustries,Raipur. Residing at: 94 JawaharNagar, DURG (Chhattisgarh). State ofChhattisgarh, Through : The Commissioner (Industry) Directorate oflndustries, 2nd Floor, LIC Building, Pandri, RAIPUR- 492001 (CG) 'y The Accountant General (Nidhi-4), O/o The Controller and Auditor General Chhattisgarh, Pagaria Complex, RAIPUR-49200 IfCG) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. J-HC-22 ~S^ •^W\v\^, dlflti'lii. facll'M'l'1' 3'n^r I^SR .(:.£:..Ci>.l..C^O_-1c:^8/A> 'WI. 200 ( HW<11 Shllch (c|*<8T' an^TTl fc-d.'*'3IRSI W*iW ^^^ aii^r ^gTw^ifea SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINkER DIWAKBR OS.13.3010 Shri B.P.Rao, counsel for the pe, Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.L. fc Smt, Smita Ghai, counsel for ititioner. ^r the State/resp. No. 1 re^p. No.2. Grievance of the petitioner in has retired on 31.7.07 but till date h|i Rs. 4,54,000 has not been paid to hiin|. Counsel for the oetitioner already made a representation on 15.^ of justice would serve if at this sta; withdraw this petition. He however issued to the authority Goncemep representation. State counsel submits that thel would be decided in accordance with U Accordingly the petitioner is with a direction to the petitioner to resp. No. 1 within a period of three copy of this order and in tum it is decided by the authority concemed months from the date of its receipt. It is made clear that this Court) on merits of the case and the authoritjy to decide the same strictly in accordan|i 'til<l[cl<il-l tlItRJf'? 'fs'st <f»ltSK ^siNifan^r |the present petition is that he ]s provident fund to the tune of su^bnrits that the petitioner has }.2010 (Annexure P/8) and ends (e the he may be pennitted to ^ubmits that direction may be for deciding his pending Irepresentation of the petitioner ^.w if ali^ady not decided. pei|mitted to withdraw this petition m4ke a fresh representation to the w^eks from the date of receipt of e^pected that the saine would be •4?ithin a further period of three has not expressed any opinion concemed :e with law. ^e_at liberty SdA .,S Pritinker Diwakar \ Judge 1