x‘xi Cr. M.P. OF 2010 S.B. PETITIONER APPLICANT WM IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR mam aenii Ashwani Kumar Dadhsena, Son of Gambhirram Dadhsena, aged 43 years, R/o. Amarpuri Chowk, Sundernagar, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS :0 1) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Home Department, (Secretariat) D . K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police, District Durg (C.G.) D.C.Tiwari, son of not known Station Officer, Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.) Non—applicant No.23 1’101’1 :02) :03) Durg, House Police :04) Yoovraj Singh Bisen, S/o. known, Assistant Sub Inspector, Police Station Utai, Distt.Durg (CG) Roopram Verma, Verma, aged :05) Non—applicant No.22 S/ 0.Jagdish ‘ 61 years, R/o. Village Ganiyari, Post. Panhdor, Police Station Utai, Dist Durg :06) District Durg (C.G.), (C.G.), Rajendra S/o. Bhukhan, aged about 43 years, ,R/o. Village Panhdor, Police Station Utai, :07) :08) years, :09) :10 ) @ Toman S/o. Talsingh, aged about 65 years, Banaoo, S/o. Heeralal aged about 65 Kanhaiyya Verma, S/o. Bhunuram Verma, aged about 50 years, Rekhram Verma S/o. Rajaram Verma, aged about 50 years, R/o. Village Panhdor, Police Station Utai, District Durg (C.G.), Sardar Shabbir Khan (Patwari) S/o. Mo. Bashir Khan, aged about 4O years, R/o. Village Dhundhava, Police Station Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Mo. Sayed Jafar Ali, S/o. Anwar Ali, aged about 46 years, Address near Jahaj Building, Vishwakarma Bhavvan, Kohka, District Durg (C.G.) Rakesh Jain, S/o. S.M.Jain, aged about 41 years, Address EWS 323 Vaishali (C.G.) Sarika Jain, S/o. Amit Jain, aged about 34 years, Address near Jain Mandir, Shantinagar Kohka, Bhilai Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) Kumar Singh S/o. R.D.Singh, aged Address 18A/22 Sector 2 Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) Santosh Singh, S/o. R.N.Singh, aged about 48 years, Address Ashish Nagar, Risali, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) :11) .:12) :13) Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg :14) :15) :16) about 43 years, ,«K4 5414‘ :18) Village Ameri, Police Station Bhilai—3, District Durg (C.G.) aged about 50, R/ 0. Village Jamrav, Police Station Patan, District D'urg (C.G.) Mahnguram, S/o. Bhutnath, aged about 6O years, R/o. Village Jamrav, Police Station and Tahsil District Durg (C.G.) Omprakash Agrawal, S/o. R/o. Khorbahra, S/o. Sakharam, aged about 50 years, :19) :20) Patan , Gandlal, aged about 50 years, Agrawal Kirana Stores, R/o. Village Jamrav, Police Station 85 Tahsil Patan, Distt. Durg (C;G.) Chhablal, S/o. Budhiyar, aged about 57 years,. Mohit, S/o. Chhablal, aged about 26 years, Bemchand, S/o. Chhablal, aged about :21) :22) :23) :24)\ “ 23 years, years , Johit, S/o. Chhablal, aged about 21 Respondent No. 21 to 24 R/o. Village. Police Station 'and Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) Yashwant Chandrakar, S / o. Shatruhan Chandrakar, aged about 4O years, R/ o. Jamrav, :25) Village Loharsi, Police Station and Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) Non—applicant No.1 to 21 Khilawan Verma, S/o. late Bisesar :26) ’\ @ (/ljw Verma, aged about 58 years, R/o. Village Nardhi, Police Station Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) :27) Manoj Sinha, S/o. G.S.Sahay, aged about 43 years, R/o. Agroha Nagar, Raipur Raypura, District Society, (C.G.) :28) Rameshar, S/o. Tijaoo aged about 43 years, R/o. Jamranw, Police Station and Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.} Non-agglicant No.22 to 26 PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 mzo 010 /p_ . 244! Pv Nu (KM WW §HT§ mm#wm $al%wanés1 5i F'v? fHmiAg‘ 2% acadura. ha i r v 311%21m (WE) mmmama 3,3,: i'im‘q”3 fine :q-x‘, m ar‘aw airW met 1 M .v I 0% ‘ UL m mmrm Ilii-IIIII-I-Illlllll-IIII-II-II-III mac emW (WE) 3mmm anéa —.1’ Amkrrdimg t” :he p iéamad Magigmie an 522: §:‘:‘=;$5?jgate me ma‘i-‘er m5? w M9 rm? tke 5‘ H ha$ 2 $ar has aim bean ‘ . re$§9ndem$ Rm i i3: ‘2 may i enqamy aga cen.a§n aMeg—aimm against the mace pj§$innéava haw ai< maae snéstamm ammmm WW#WW aiWanéal : mg the mswnd 3r Gh’en by tm$ (Lauri, Jeamea wam \ I“) CJ s: 3 ii)m :3‘ m {I} anvet: w a"mav+ E 5W¢¢WCE®1E (‘mi'z-‘W tuaT ax .o‘W" "JO 1" b 6’1 yew r‘? iv winged mi i1 (m mnQ am Wibe a om? smaa *m faspim’denfs aamew 935%,, a : Ram ,jra Mama? {$61 an Q iam‘ging a” ”mg? mars. directians wera é$$uea tax; the 293:3 em 53.2m0 $3 ihe mm K5 m‘ mg baa“ .1 rggmiered ax} in aii ‘Ihe aeEEiaae wa the ms? w v {eswm‘iemss E in mar gei'itima %e§a 3 ma irva‘: :gsimg 0?’ sewn Ari if“ if hag w u Q‘m'm‘raa .i‘! 8) 4 1 m ‘$m i") c; 3r if<~ 3“‘ 'Ci Egnau “mt: am “‘3 q made : an £11 n, ....................... . ..... E20 matmm ammam WW§WW _ aiwmsr were issued b the ieamgd submit ha firsa§ repay? §t haé that based an ihi$ directécm < *he , l R was ‘ gISier z. ac; am we mattar §$ umie'r imam 1 y ‘- S?’£ cwasaihatmu fi‘a appiiatatigm Lindy S$EU 3r; 15${3‘a CrRC‘ be€bm the Mawatrate \J ) $$Lieoi *3 i‘he Staimn Hsu‘ée mficea Uiai r an 8w 4C Q ami 2 m tm {my u:%%rera‘tiam which was waS ta imestigate the mattar“ Siam gramme? submiks 82.2010 on the compQami or Duiariba‘i and San‘tash, inves submétied 0n 232.29% bet“ was net acceptad begause t? aitachad with Em repm“ 1?. has bses not recorded and we¥e mt submmed mat these staiemems cams; mt bs rssgrxjsd because the n {has Sims smmss% submiis ma? ‘t‘m fa: campiaments were mt iracet Magsiraie m regi$€er ima affeme am‘ bean somemad b w: St Caimsaa E the §eemad Magi te Qr‘ 5 “’5‘?” wmt “(2a m1 §mer$ m a! t‘wa ? se. Sig man i‘r as fmhet men camanrjad 73. be a$ a gamma? wasg, Semimem haxsa and whae enteri-amiag these a991§sa§ima mat purwant ta We d§rect§en is‘sued on newtmnarg {Eanesmr‘ was d . ‘rma, axiggiion was ams am“ the mom? was m the earred Mag siuaw mt * P samn ‘e s€atamants cf the comwamamsa we‘re I‘‘lv mamas ..... ............. E20 anéar m (W) NA bearing No. $772010. He sui‘. miis mai as saoh 3$ the siatgmems a? ihese three camp‘éainanis rameiy Ganeghwar Prasazi Shawna; Duiaribaé and Samosh are 1emr§ec§ we rapm would he again 1 submiited before tha Competem Cram“ m ra$p€s§ x3? the camg %i petitioners: nameiy Ashwani Kumar Daajmiana am Mama {Eaahsenai it has been argued by the Stat m inveeiigate the matier. in beiween was issued by the Magistrate 8 3 9010 and 1.5 :20? G, the effzrts were maee $9 reeerd- the sta%emerat of these petiiionefe bui as they are net Wes-eabie; the? staiemenie came) not be recomed an inveetigated. Lookmg m ihis, n ‘fl4n2mG semmens were aiee veeued to theee eetitmners Lmder Preeedure it: be sewee m they are not Tummg up and i :ch wiw him ame‘ inerefere, ‘z‘ee eame these pexiiienes aye me? in t may be iseued ta them wrestiw State eeeneei fume? submie mat as on the basis 0f campiemi W. G u be fume? the matter ceuid net eouneei that em 543 EMS directien cfxien we of tee Cede 0f Qa’imme'é h their wee: aavecetee em. ewea :hen eoncemed Adveeete hes repiaed that Qeee Rem \ierme‘. §aneu Gem f \ m . h s t e e e mamam'ai aananéamim mmmm‘a mamifwm asmanéa was aise mentioned in ihe Rojnamcha Sanha da’md 2332f§10 311%W (W3) wmmméa W§qii$ "nun-"nun" n."- ..... n- E20 and Ragendra Mehar, case thew appearance bgmre ihe Poiice, may petitioners! ‘they are avoiding be because 9f thew apprehemsien thai they mg‘nt be awegad by me poiice" Hawever, ur1ies3 t‘h autfaomies and subm§t ai? tha the poiica ta submit ma compEance 3f the order dartei i have heard munseé' ayaiiaiaie on‘neamd“ i find m {same in'tha a rgumem 3f tha pet§t5s3nefs the? {Amie Qhe directionS is issued by the $ the pmice is beam it) regis£ mvestigatmn can be 6am, in zhe case in ham, t? 3a 5m}! dimmim whéQh was giahen ay we ieamed Magisawate m the p jice was t0 énveytigaéfe the ma‘tia and pwsuant to that, sincare e1? investigate the matmr. Ef {he pmcedura it %s naw Tia? ma paitimers t0 they are Qbiiga to fo$iow Ega aw ézhe e petitmners mme befrgre mg gamma denument$ heme them ii Q dif?iau”¢ fer repor; befme ieamed Waj$ivaia in a822m D am SEQmG“ far the part‘zeS am @E‘rwm iwg ma‘iavia‘i Aegi$trate to inves$igaie ihe matm‘r Ehem 3r the offence and withcm the same m farts hava beam made by éhe wiice a pwtmcnevs we intereskd t0 get guaine, XinHo— 3WW (WE) snéamEHiai aananéemqm' mma‘ww ._ (9—- $Wané21 mmmm co—oneyate WW1 the pmice. if {he petii‘umers dc nm pmzauae 315 the relevam armaments befere the psiice authnr‘aties and w§ii mi gre$9n mr. themse‘wes for recordmg ih air stafemema it wauid ’93 d;??icmt far ahe poiice ta énvestigaia the ma tear. Undar Sec-mm 156g.) 0f the Cgde of? Qr‘ammat F’mcedura ieamed Magistrate as fuiiy} 5fified m issu‘mg dgraamn m éma pmace fm A investigat§on of the matier d ii is mt mcumbent xi“ ma mm a? the n poHce auther§tie$ i0 im ed§ate§y ragéster me HR 3? afier investigatidn ihe poHce c, e m tins smmmmn that ”the Czf§ence has been wmmimd by any the rewana‘gma the a$i§an a3 {equérgwk o under the law wewd foHaw. At this stage, §€ has beam aa'gu W9 aeiiticna-{s that the getitiener$ are wmg m ca-ogayate in the inv&si%ga€i0n, iiiay in Wm make ihem3e§ves avaiiabie bemre the paiiaa aimoméra$ and wauid alse :emciuse aii fre re§evani gacumgma He Submita thai peéitioners wisa preseni :hef1$ei\.r‘es bafara {he peiiae authomies wiéhm 15 days from the mmin‘? mi com; 03" this ordaar aad w3~ii gyoduane a“ the reievant dacument$. ur‘.) ‘z M: 4.: W§qi$ .n..n..n I-Illlul-lll-l-II-n-u-Iull-I maze m , ‘ w 3 anéeiw (W) mstmw ammeim mmwma vat WW#WW ‘ $Wanés’r DI- Be that as it may, it i$ u; y to peiitignars {Q Gec‘zcie as ta wneéhe? ingestigatian or not. if the pefitmaerg they want to co-Qperate in the appear hefcre the 1m5$tigatk ‘g {Dfficen their sstaiememg wau‘id L‘e recorded .anminvewgatmg e ‘fiaer Mi? nmsaed. VLF? ths ca$g in accordance with law. With the anew 0b$ervam§1$3 he patmms 3mm téispa$ed m. # ¢mm#w‘ m §m:§ .................................... 1H 20 ‘ J Sdl- x mit'mker D‘Waker 1} Kn! Judge k