IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2010 / 2ND MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2218 of 2010(B) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- JAYARAMAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, SREENARAYANA BHAVANAM, CHANDIROOR P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.C.G.RAJ KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. PIRAVAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PIRAVAM, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, PIRAVAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PIRAVAM, ERNAKULAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.2218 of 2010 (B) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance is that in order to construct a residential house, he has submitted Exts.P6 & P8 applications for supply of river sand. It is stated that although all required documents have been produced by him before the Panchayat, orders have not been passed on his applications. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, he has submitted Exts.P6 & P8 applications and has produced all required documents, there is no reason why the Panchayat should not consider the applications. 3. Having regard to the above, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P6 & P8 applications made by the petitioner. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent, who shall WP(C) No.2218/2010 -2- comply with this direction. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg