IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU FRIDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2007 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1928 RPFC.No. 74 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CMP 1499/04 IN MC.350/2002 of FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE .................... REVISION PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- A.K. MUTHUKOYA, S/O.CHERIYA KOYA, AKKARA HOUSE, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADEEP, KALPENI ISLAND. BY ADV. SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD SRI.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. M.T. AYISHABI, D/O.ABDULLA, THOTTOLIPADAM PARAMBU, FRANCIS ROAD, NAGARAM ASMOM DESOM, P.O.KALLAI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.A.S.SABU PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.BREEZE M.S. THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R.UDAYABHANU, J --------------------------------------------- R.P.(FC) No.74 of 2007 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2007 ORDER Revision petitioner has sought for setting aside the order of the court below rejecting his application to set aside the ex-parte order. 2. The same was opposed. 3. I find from the order of the court below that on four times on his applications, the ex-parte orders were set aside. The reason mentioned is that he is in his old age and is suffering from various ailments and even difficult to move properly and hence he could not adduce evidence in the matter. I find that he had sufficient opportunity to adduce evidence if he so desired. There is no ground to interfere. The revision petition is dismissed. K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE csl K.R.UDAYABHANU, J Crl.R.P.No.929 of 1997 ORDER 26th February, 2007