yi6H COUKr OF CHHAmSQARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI H.L DATTU, CJ. Contempt Petitlon No^ of 2004 PETITIONER Atxlul R. Lstif, son of Late Abdul Rashid, aged about 75 yeare, Madam Siddique's house, Daigah Road, Talapara, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS BESPONDENT K.K. Chakraborty, Managing dlrector, Infrastructupe Developjnent Corporation, Shashtri Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Contemrt Petition under Arttete 215 of Constitution af India. Present: Shri Manoj Sinha, counsel for the petiUoner. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, couneel fbrthe Fecponctent. ORAt ORDER (Passedon 1"May,M07) This Court by its orcter dated 05-81 -2004 had disposed of Wrtt PetMon No. 3376/2003 with a directron to the 2^ respondent namely Infrastrurture Development Corporation through its Managlng Director to d«clethe olaim crf Late Naushid Iqbal within a period of three months from the date of the order and to pay the amounts due to the person authortzed on behalf of Shri Naushid tqbal. (2) Petittoner In the saict writ petition has flled thts contempt petitlon. Me has arrayed one K.K. Cliakraborty, Managing Director, InfrastructuFS Development Coiporation, Shastri Chowk, Raipur asthe respondent. (3) Notice of this conteropt petition was issued to the aspondent and Me has entered appearancethroughShri Ashish Shrtvastava, tearned counsd. (4) Shri Ashish Shrivastava, leamed counsel, appearing on behatf of respondent woutd submit that at no point (rf time K.K. Chakraborty wss the Managhg Director of the InTrastructure Development Corporation. K.K. Chakraborty has also filed his retum befbre this Ccxjrt arri he has ^ated lon ^, ,_^,...BB,HB*<Bm>'UC»~. ,.stai..'U.*-*-*"-t*Ace't'i'is''"";'a~'' .....itt.lt.lit^...^^r^^^-^^^' ^..z^.s;^'"."'"'"* ' x oath that at no point of time he was the Managing Diieotor ef the Irrfra^racture Development Corporation. (5) The contempt prooeedfn^ are quasi erminat pFDoeectings and theretere whlle allegir^ tfte act of disobedience against the non-a^lioant, it is expected of the eomplainant to imptead a proper person who is said to have committed disobedience ofthe orders and direettons issu«iby this GCTjrt. (6) In the instent case K.K. Ctiakraborty has stated on oath th^ at no polrt of time he was the Managing Director of Infrastrucfcire Dwelopment Corporation. This assertion is not disputed by leamed counsel for the petitioner. (7) In vlew of the above, I oamiot entertaan this cortempt petftian. Acoordirgly, the contenyt proceeding requires to be dropped and it » dropped. Orderedaccordingly. Sd/- ChiefJustice t 1111