1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 2473 of 2006 Surendra and ors v. The Union of India and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr V.T. Bhoskar, Adv for petitioners Mr R.S. Sunderam, Adv for respdt no.2. Coram : A.M. Khanwilkar and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 16th April 2008 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are in agreement with the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondent no. 2. In that, petitioners are challenging three separate orders by way of one common writ petition. Be that as it may, the petitioners have failed to offer any plausible explanation for filing present writ petition in May 2006 whereas the orders which are impugned in this writ petition were passed by the Competent Authority and/or Tribunal on 16th September 1998, 18th January 2002 and 30th May 2002 respectively. 2 In the circumstances, this petition deserves to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. Judge. Judge. H s joshi