1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5525 OF 2008 Miss. Sradha Ashokrao Suryavanshi ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.P. Davhale Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 and 2. Shri.V.D. Hon Advocate for Resp. Nos.3 and 4. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 19TH MARCH, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner prayed for relief in relation to advertisement in the year 2008-2009 for appointment of persons having certificate of "project affected person". The Petitioner claims 2 to be a project affected person. 3. The Respondents filed affidavit in reply. We have perused the same. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that as per the Judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others, reported in 2009 (4) Mh. L.J. Page 961, it has now been held that person having project affected certificate could compete by applying against the post as mentioned in the advertisement. 4. In the light of the reply filed and the submissions advanced, Writ Petition is dismissed. It is made clear that dismissal of the Petition shall not affect the Petitioner's right to participate in future selection process, in accordance with law. [N.D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/MAR10/wp5525.08