IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2010 / 22ND ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 21067 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SUNILKUMAR S., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. SIVAN, SUNIL BHAVAN, MULAKUZHA MURI, MULAKKUZHA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH MURALI RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001. 4. VIJAYAN, AGED 50 YEARS, SUMESH BHAVAN, KUTTOOR MURI, KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 101. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI. T K VIPINDAS FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 21067 of 2010 G - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this Court complaining harassment by the police officials. 2. Briefly the case of the petitioner is as follows. The petitioner is living with his family and aged parents. He was working abroad from 2005 to 2007. Thereafter he returned to his native place and now he is working in different temples as 'santhi'. The 4th respondent had received Rs.50,000/- from the petitioner promising to secure a job visa at Gulf. Due to the non- issuance of VISA, there are disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. The petitioner filed a complaint against the 4th respondent before Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chengannur W.P.(C).No. 21067 of 2010 2 under Section 420 I.P.C. A crime was registered against the 4th respondent, who is a highly influential person. He filed a false complaint before the Chengannur Police Station against the petitioner. The second respondent and his party came to the house of the petitioner and threatened him and his aged parents. 3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the 4th respondent has filed a petition before the NORKA alleging that whenever the 4th respondent comes to India, the petitioner files complaints against him and he is repeatedly summoned to the Police Station. That complaint was forwarded to the Superintendent of Police, who directed the Circle Inspector to enquir. The petitioner was summoned to the Police Station once as part of the enquiry and his statement was recorded. It is further submitted that thereafter the petitioner was not summoned. The learned Government Pleader submits that the petitioner or the members of his family will not be harassed. W.P.(C).No. 21067 of 2010 3 4. We record the said submissions and close this Writ Petition. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm