:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1470 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1470 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1470 OF 2007 Kalim @ Pasha A. Wahid Valsangkar & Ors. ...Petitioners. v. Smt.Taherbegum @ Nurhat Sultana Kalim @ Pasha Valsangkar & Anr. ...Respondents. Mr.Shrishail Sakhare , adv. for the Petitioners. Mr.Umesh Kurund, adv. for the Respondent No.1. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP for the Respondent No.2/State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE B.H.MARLAPALLE B.H.MARLAPALLE & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE: 9th June, 2008. DATE: 9th June, 2008. DATE: 9th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Sakhare the learned counsel for the petitioners. Admittedly after C.R.No.36 of 2005 was registered with Akkalkot Police Station, investigation was undertaken by the police and the report was submitted to the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class at Akkalkot. As per the instructions, charge-sheet has not yet been filed and he further submits that there is no substance in the said case as the case has been registered as R.C.C.No.36 of 2005. 2. Remedy of the petitioners is two folds, namely, either to approach the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class at Akkalkot for discharge or approach the Court of Revision to quash the process. :2: Even otherwise the petitioners are not stopped from approaching this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the criminal case itself. 3. Hence, petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioners as stated above. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)