IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.722 of 2007 SUMAN DEVI Versus JAI PRAKASH MISTRI ----------- 4 21.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. In view of what has been brought on evidence by the parties, there being no guaranteed source of income for the husband, this Court for the present, would not interfere in the impugned order awarding Rs. 500/- per month to the petitioner. This order, however, will not preclude the petitioner from seeking an enhancement under Section 127 in case she can adduce evidence of enhanced income beyond what was recorded by the Court below in the impugned order. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this civil revision application is hereby disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)