IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22097 of 2009 RAJESH KUMAR, SON OF LATE RAGHUPATI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHUSHDIHARA, P.S. MAHANDIA, DISTRICT ARWAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It is stated that one alleged mobile was recovered from the possession of the petitioner but identity of that mobile has not been established with the stolen mobile. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by looking to the seizure list vis- à-vis first information report, the mobile recovered from the possession of the petitioner was not the stolen mobile. Petitioner is in custody since 2.12.2008. It is stated that he has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. Petitioner (Rajesh Kumar)is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of - 2 - Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No.52/2008. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)