1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 106 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10684 OF 2004 Rajlakshmi Nagari Sahakari Bank Limited ...Appellant Versus Sonali d/o Shrichand Jain and another ...Respondents ..... None for the petitioner Mr. A.K. Tiwari, advocate for respondent No.1. ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 28TH OCTOBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Since this Appeal from order is directed against the interim order and was to be heard alongwith the Civil Revision Application No. 212 of 2004. Since this Court has upheld the contention the petitioner in Civil Revision Application No.212 of 2004 that the suit is not maintainable in view of Section 34 of the Securitization Act and therefore, any order passed by the civil Court granting injunction against the appellant would not survive. Since this court has taken a view that the jurisdiction of the civil court in view of the Section 34 of the Securitization Act is barred, this appeal from order stands allowed. Impugned order dated 18.6.2004 2 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Dhule, below Exh.5 in Special Civil suit No. 52 of 2004 is quashed and set aside. 2 Civil Application No. 10684 of 2004 stands disposed of. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/