HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIQNBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Misc. Appeal No.314 of2003 Appellants >• 1. Yasin Bi, widow of Rehman Mohd. aged about 20 years. 2. Imran Khan, aged about 3 yrs. Son of Rehman Mohd. 3. Akeela Bi, daughter of late Rehman Mohd. Aged about 4 years. Appellants No. 2 and 3 are minors through natural guardian mother Smt. Yasin Bi. All residents of Chakarbhata Tehsil Bilha, distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. VERSUS Respondents .Ajay Kumar son of Nanhi Ram Vishwakarma, resident of Bagburha, Bhesma, Police Station Korba, distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Present address ICI Company, Madan Mahal, Jabalpur, distt. Jabalpur, M.P. Jabalpur Fabricators, Vehicle Owner, Vehicle No. M.P. 23D 3012, Napier Town 112, Jabalpur M.P. Oriental Insurance Company, City Branch, 124, NapierTown, Jabalpur, M.P. Insurer ofVehicle No. M.P. 23D 3012. Holaram Balecha, vehicle owner, vehicle No. MIL 6312, Chakrabhata, Tahsil Bilha, dist. Bilaspur C.G. li /:.. ..-^ i f? ^^:^ u ^i:&^:% <SW<J "W .^€ ^^^^^"" 5 New India Insurance Company, Rajendra Nagar, Bilaspur, C'garh, Insurer of vehicle No.MOL - 6312 K.. "'s^-1 MEMORANDUM OFAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTORVEH&LESACT Present: None for the appellants. Shri Shreekumar Agrawal, Senior Counsel with Shri Raj Awasthi, counsel for respondent No.5. ORDER (01stApril,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appeliants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want qf prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Juslice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu