IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3261 of 2010. Decided on: May 28, 2010 Rajesh Kumar ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since his appointment as Laboratory Attendant in Post Graduate Degree College Dhaliara made by the PTA has been terminated by the third respondent without any authority and allowed fifth respondent to join in his place. 2. It is for the petitioner to bring this aspect to the notice of second respondent. In the event of petitioner filing an appropriate representation before the second respondent, the second respondent will consider the same and take appropriate action within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the Writ Petition. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application. Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 28, 2010 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (rks) Judge.