IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30307 of 2010 MITHILESH KUMAR YADAV @ MITHILESH YADAV, S/O LATE KISHUNDHAN YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-KANP WARD NO.6, PANCHAYAT- KANP, P.S. SAUR BAZAR, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. --PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 31.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is named accused in this case carries allegation and he, being brother of Mukhiya, committed some forgery in the cheque issued in the name of the complainant informant which has handed over to the issuing authority for certain correction and subsequently encashed. But, nothing appears from lengthy order of the Sessions Judge supporting the appellations against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Saur Bazar P.S. Case 2 no. 3 of 2010, vide G.R. no. 23 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for one year or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad