IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27317 of 2009 1. Taslim Son of Md. Jamil. 2. Bibi Nazima Khatoon wife of Taslim. Both are residents of Village- Purni Ghat, P.S. Rautara, District- Katihar........................................................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.........................Opposite Party. ----------- 03. 24.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. There is 498A and maintenance case against the husband. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that if really money was not withdrawn by the informant ought to be reported earlier to 498A case. Moreover, thumb impression used in withdrawal of the money should be examined by an expert which is lacking. So, basing the allegation petitioners’ arrest can not be justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. U.K. (Mandhata Singh,J)