IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 373 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated ______ in WP NO : 14773 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sri.P.Easu Ratnam, S/o Ananda Rao, Sri Bajarang Jute Mill Ltd., Pattabhipuram, Guntur, Guntur District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1. The Sectretary, Applellate Authority For Industrial & Financial Reconstruction, Jeevan Prakash Buildings, 25 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi. 2 The Secretary, Board for industrial and financial Reconstruction, Jawahar Vyapar Bhavan, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi. 3 The Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce Dept, Government Of A.P., Hyderabad. 4 The Commissioner, Industries & Commerce Dept., Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 5 The General Manager,. District Industries Centre, Guntur. 6 The Chairman & Managing Director, I.D.B.I., The Operating Agency, Mumbai. 7 The Special Director, B.I.F.R., S.B.J.M.L., Company, Film Nagar, Hyderabad. Disd For Default As Per Court Order Dt 4.11.03 8 M/s. East India Commercial Company Ltd., Lessee, Sri Krishna Jute Mill, Eluru, West Godavari District, A.P., .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SMT.N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.BATHULA VENKATESWARA RAO The Division Bench of this Court made the following : (Judgment follows 2nd page) THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 373 of 2002. J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meenakumari) The writ appeal is filed against order dated 31-12-2001 passed in WP.No. 14773 of 2001 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition observing that the BIFR has approved the scheme under the provisions of the SICK 1985 in 1994 and modified the scheme on 22-5-1997 and in such event, the individual-workman cannot challenge the scheme as such when the Union itself has accepted the same to be implemented. 2. When the matter came up today, Smt. N. Shoba, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that nothing survives in the writ appeal and the writ appeal itself has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above submission, the writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 16-6-2009. I s L