IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH COCP No. 703 of 2007 Date of decision August 23, 2011 Kamla Devi ....... Petitioner Versus Anil Kumar, IAS, Haryana Urban Local Bodies Department and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- bMr. Nikhil Sharma , Advocate for Mr. R. K. Malik, Senior Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG., Haryana. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Counsel for the petitioner admits that the relief sought for has already been granted and there is no need for further action on the petition. 2. Copy of the statement of the petitioner is produced by State which shall form part of the record. 3. Statement of both the counsel is recorded to dispose of the petition as unnecessary. 4. COCP is disposed of as such. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 23, 2011 archana