Crl. Misc.No.M 10625 of 2010(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.No.M 10625 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision:-17.08.2010 Anil Kumar Mehndiratta. ....Petitioner. Versus The Union Territory of Chd. & Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. H.S. Bhullar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Tarundeep Kumar, Advocate for U.T. Mr. Jagdish Marwaha, Advocate for respondent no.2. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Crl. Misc.No.19155 of 2010 Application seeking exemption under Section 482 Cr.PC from filing the certified copies of Annexures P-1 to P-3 is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc.No.M 10625 of 2010 Petitioner Anil Kumar Mehndiratta was convicted vide judgment dated 30.7.2009 by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh Crl. Misc.No.M 10625 of 2010(O&M) #2# for an offence under Sections 498-A of IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for two years. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.PC has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the FIR No.38 dated 22.2.2000 under Sections 498-A, 120-B IPC Police Station Sector 19, Chandigarh which culminated into aforesaid judgment of conviction dated 30.7.2009 on the basis of a compromise effected between the petitioner husband and complainant-respondent no.2 wife. Admittedly the compromise was effected between the parties in proceedings regarding permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Statements on oath of the parties i.e. Petitioner-husband and respondent no.2-wife during the said proceedings have been annexed as Annexure P-2 and P-3. At the time of arguments learned counsel for petitioner prays that he does not press this petition as he wishes to raise the plea of compromise before the learned Appellate Court at an appropriate Stage. Counsel for respondents have no objection to such request. Prayer is genuine and the same is accepted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to raise the plea of compromise before the learned Appellate court, which shall be dealt in accordance with law. ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 17th August, 2010 Vinay