IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26555 of 2008 NAGMANI PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.33 of 2007 for the alleged offences registered under sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not a named accused. It is further submitted that neither the petitioner was present on the spot nor the person, who was arrested on the spot, named the involvement of this petitioner in the commission of the alleged crime. The said person, however, named two persons, namely, Suraj Paswan and Kundan Paswan. The learned APP, on the other hand, submits that those two persons during investigation had named the petitioner and on search an umbrella was found from the house of the petitioner. 2 Considering the above, it is directed that petitioner Nagmani Paswan, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rupaspur P.S.Case No.33 of 2007, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)