IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7928 of 2009 DHARMENDRA KUMAR, son of Daya Nand Pandit, resident of Bihar Road, Hilsa, P.S.-Hilsa, District-Nalanda. …….Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary, Staff Selection Commission, C.G.O., Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 3. The Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission(C.R.), Dept. of personnel and training, 8 A-B, Belie Road, Allahabad. 4. The Director General, Central Industrial Security Force, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 5. Assistant Director General(R & S), Central Industrial Security Force, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. ……Respondents. ----------- 02. 14.07.2009 Heard the parties. The petitioner had applied for direct entry into Central Police Force in the examination 2007. He was selected but then found medially unfit on the ground of external haemorroids and Gapping and over crowing of upper incisor teeth. He had the option to appeal against such findings. He filed an appeal and again the same was confirmed. Petitioner made enquiry and found that these were minor physical deformities which could be corrected in the teeth. He contacted qualified doctors who removed those disabilities and certified the same. He again applied for re-medical examination which has been turned down. Petitioner asserts that he now suffers from no medical disability and should be considered accordingly as he had - 2 - qualified otherwise. In my view, petitioner’s case requires reconsideration by the authorities. The medical unfitness was not such which was incurable it was attended to and the disability removed. He is now certified fit for duty. Respondents would accordingly be obliged to reconsider his case for selection for CPF (Direct Entry) Sub-Inspector examination 2007. Reconsideration must be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this order before the concerned authorities and result thereof communicated to the petitioner after proper physical re-examination immediately. With these observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Shageer (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)