IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2807 of 2009 Hira Lal Prasad . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 4/ 08/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Despite the passage of two and a half years the respondents have failed to file counter affidavit. In the nature of the claim, no useful purpose is going to be served by keeping the writ application pending. Let the respondents consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of A.C.P. in accordance with law. Needless to state that if they find justification in his claim or in any part of the claim keeping in mind his superannuation the pension shall have to be revised accordingly. Should the respondents propose to deny the claim or any part of the claim, they shall be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner to facilitate judicial review if he is so aggrieved. It is expected that any legitimate dues found payable shall also be paid within the period indicated. Let this order in its entirety be complied with 2 within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application is disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)