IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-24190 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 5.12.2011. The Chandra Lok Cooperative House Building Society Limited. ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Yadav, DAG, Haryana. Mr. AK Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.7. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This complainant's petition is directed against the order dated August 21st, 2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurgaon whereby evidence of the prosecution was closed. A perusal of the order shows that summonses were issued to four witnesses viz. Randhir Sub-Inspector, Raj Singh, M. Kunwar and Mahesh Appa but they were not served upon. Even the explanation of the Police officials was called for as to why the witnesses were not summoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner supported by the State counsel has stated that only the above named witnesses are to be examined by the petitioner and they shall be examined on the next date of hearing. Be that as it may, if the witnesses were not served upon, it was not a fault on the part of the petitioner for which he could be blamed. In view of this, the petition is accepted and the impugned order is set-aside. The petitioner is accorded opportunity to examine the aforesaid witnesses, of course, through the process of Court. 5.12.2011. (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE