1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3519 OF 2007 Sau. Kamal Bhushan Panjabi v. The Khamgaon Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd.. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.A.S.Kilor Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.P.Deshpande Advocate for the Respdt. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 13 th SEPTEMBER, 2007. Heard Mr.Kilor, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Deshpande, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The controversy in the present writ petition is fully covered by the Division Bench decision of this Court in W.P. 2672/07 and other connected matters decided on 3.7.2007 by the Aurangabad Bench. In that decision it has been held that the provisions of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest 2 Act, 2002 expressly include within its ambit Co-operative Banks though not under the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institution Act. The proceedings which are taken up by the bank were under Securitisation Act and the orders passed therein are challenged in the present writ petition. The only point urged by Mr.Kilor is that Securitisation Act will not include Co- operative Banks and, as such, the action under that Act is wholly not maintainable. 3. In view of the above decision of this Court, the said contention will have to be rejected. Petition is therefore dismissed. No costs. JUDGE /TA/