IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 152/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3088/2008 (Rukminidevi Shankarlal Agrawal and others vrs. Rajendra Hiralal Jain and another) ................................................................................................................................................... ...... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... ...... Shri A.S.Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner Shri G.G.Mishra, counsel for R-1 and R-2 ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 24th NOVEMBER, 2010. The Affidavit dated 4.10.2010 has been filed on behalf of the respondents, in which the statements are made in para 3 as under; “3] I further say that, however, the Board of Directors vide Resolution No. 9, dated 27/9/2010 has already passed a Resolution to implement the directions of this Hon’ble Court and a decision has been taken to transfer the individual share and grant membership in accordance with the Judgment of the Hon’ble Court. The said transfer of shares has been made subject to the result of the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Bank. Copy of the said Resolution dated 27/9/2010 is enclosed and annexed herewith as Annexure R-1 to this affidavit” Shri Samarth, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that according to his instructions, the shares have already been transferred subject the result of the L.P.A. In view of the aforesaid statement, nothing survives in this contempt petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE Rvjalit