1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1134 & 1139 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1134 OF 2011 AND WRIT PETITION NO.: 1139 OF 2011 *** 1. At the stage of final arguments Petitioner/ plaintiff sought appointment of Commissioner and also production of certain documents. There is already report of Commissioner on record and petitioner/ plaintiff has raised objection to it. Similarly, the records show that revenue proceeding was going on between parties and the controversy is concluded by the order of High Court. 2. All these facts were thus within knowledge of petitioner/ plaintiff and still there is no explanation why appropriate steps could not be taken at relevant stages. 3. As I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity, present petition is not entertained. With liberty to the petitioner to challenge impugned order dated 28th 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1134 & 1139 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. January, 2011 below Exhibit-91 and 92 [in Writ Petition No.1134 of 2011] and also the impugned order dated 28th January, 2011 below Exhibit Nos.74 and 75 [in Writ Petition No. 1139 of 2011] after the suit is finally decided if occasion therefor arises. Present writ petitions are disposed of. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:23/02/2011. ans/1134