IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12175 of 2011 Phoolpati ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Petitioner's husband died in the year 1988. As per the averment made, her case for grant of appointment was approved some time in the year 1989. The petitioner had served a legal notice in the year 1999. The petitioner waited far too long to further pursue her case either for appointment or compassionate assistance. Only in the year 2010, the petitioner has got some information that her case for appointment was approved in the year 1989. On this basis, she has filed this writ petition. At this belated stage, no compassion either for appointment or for compassionate assistance can remain. If the family can survive for all these years without any assistance or service, there would hardly be any need for financial assistance or for a job on compassionate ground at this belated stage. Dismissed. July 14, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE