IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 34197 of 2007(U) PETITIONER: BELSY R., W/O MARCOSE, AGED 56, MANALIVILAKATHU ROAD, ARIKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, MUKKAMPALAMOOD, NARUVAMOOD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -20. BY ADVS. SRI.M.RAMASWAMY PILLAI SRI.P.M.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PROJECT OFFICER, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, NEMOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-20. 4. SARADA DEVI, NO.122 ANGANVADI WORKER, PALLICHAL PANCHAYAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-20. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.34197 of 2007 U ------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of November, 2007. JUDGMENT Petitioner is one of the Anganvadi workers under the Integrated Child Development Programme which comes under the Pallichal Panchayath. Petitioner is aggrieved by the transfer effected under Ext.P5 order passed by the 3rd respondent. In my view, the remedy of the petitioner is to move the Director, 2nd respondent herein. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to approach the 2nd respondent with a representation. If a representation is filed within three weeks from today, the 2nd respondent shall, after notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent, take a decision within a period of four weeks from the date of its receipt. The transfer ordered under Ext.P5 will be subject to the order to be passed by the 2nd respondent. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge