THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No. 21397 of 2000 Dated: 02.12.2010 Between: G.V.Subba Rao, Nalgonda. ..... PETITIONER AND A.P.State Ware Housing Corporation Hyderabad and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No. 21397 of 2000 ORDER: The petitioner herein was appointed as Junior Assistant in the 1st respondent-Corporation on 27.01.1987. His services were terminated on 04.06.1988 and challenging the same, the petitioner preferred I.D.No.564 of 1993 under Section 2-A (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad. By award dated 02.06.1994 the order of termination was set aside and the Corporation was directed to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service. In pursuance thereof, the petitioner was reinstated on 17.12.1994. Subsequently, by proceedings dated 16.09.1997, the services of the petitioner were regularized as Junior Assistant and the time scale of pay was extended from the date of the said order. The petitioner made a representation claiming regularization of his services with retrospective affect and requesting to rectify the anomaly since his reinstatement was ordered by the Labour Court with continuity of service. However, the petitioner’s request was rejected vide proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 17.09.1999. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition has been filed. Despite notice, no counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the respondents. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. A mere perusal of the impugned order dated 17.09.1999 shows that the petitioner’s claim for service benefits from the date of his appointment was rejected without taking into consideration the affect of the award of the Labour Court in I.D.No.564 of 1993 directing reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service. Hence, on that ground alone the matter requires reconsideration. Accordingly, the impugned order is hereby set aside and the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to reconsider the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 02.12.2010 KLP