IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: January 24, 2011 Crl. Revision No. 1769 of 2010 Naresh Kumar and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents Crl. Revision No. 2223 of 2010 Dharambir …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioners (In CRR No. 1769 of 2010) Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent – State. Mrs. Baljit Mann, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. (In CRR No.1769 of 2010) and for the petitioner (In CRR No. 2223 of 2010) Alok Singh, J. (Oral) CRR No. 1769 of 2010 Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the parties, have fairly stated that applications under Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure requesting the Court for summoning the additional accused were dismissed in both the cases observing therein that only examination in chief of PW1 had been conducted. Both the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the parties, have further fairly stated that fresh application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. shall be moved after recording of further evidence, which should be decided afresh, at its own merit without being prejudiced from the impugned orders. Present petitions are disposed of with the direction that in the event of moving fresh application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. after recording of further evidence, learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to decide the application of the petitioner(s) afresh, at its own merit, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced from the impugned orders. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the connected matters. January 24, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2