-1- W.P. No. 8812 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8812 OF 2009 Vijaysingh Babasaheb Patil ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr. Machindra A. Patil, instructed by Mr. S.D. Patil, for the petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for the State. Mr. Vinay Bhate, instructed by M/s. Little and Company, for respondent No.2. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 05, 2010. P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, states that he would like to withdraw this petition with a view to file a civil suit. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with a view to file a civil suit, we permit him to withdraw the petition. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, subject to what is stated above. 2. All the contentions of both the sides are kept open. It is clarified that we have not adjudicated the issue involved in the petition on merits in any manner and we have simply permitted the petitioner withdraw as he wants to file a civil suit. We hope the College authorities may not take any steps for -2- W.P. No. 8812 of 2009 cancellation of the admission for a period of two weeks from today as the petitioner is likely to take appropriate proceedings by way of a civil suit. It is also clarified that this may not be treated as a favourable aspect at the time when any injunction application is to be decided by the Civil Court as the Civil Judge will have to decide the same on its own merits and without even considering the observations made in this order in any manner. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.M. SAVANT, J.