IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1644 of 2008 ANUP KUMAR Versus MUNNI DEVI & ORS ----------- 2 29/9/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would not like to interfere with the impugned order, in as much as, the court below has recorded finding that the ingredients of order 38 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not attracted, apprehension expressed by counsel for the petitioner that certain observation made in the impugned order may subsequently affect on the merit of the case, seems to be wholly misconceived because it is well settled that any finding given for the purpose of interim order will never govern the final outcome of the case. That being so, this application is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar