FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 593 OF 2008 IN S.C.SUIT NO. 601 OF 2002 [ Hridaylal Mahaguram Yadav V/S.Sahaturam Ramdas Yadav & Ors. ] Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar orders Mr.A.K.Singh,adv.for appellant. Mr.A.M.Vernekar a/w.Mr.Ashutosh Gavnekar,adv.for respondents. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 13TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. The consent terms signed by the parties and their respective advocates are taken on record and marked `X’. These consent terms are being filed in the First Appeal arising out of judgment and decree dated 24th November, 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil court in a suit for enforcing the deed of partnership between the parties. Clause-6 of the consent terms provides for discharge of the Court Receiver without passing accounts. It appears that during pendency of the suit, by the interim order dated 16th March, 2004, Court Receiver, High Court Bombay was appointed Receiver in respect of the suit business and the premises and arrangement had been arrived at for conduct of the business by the parties taking turns. When the suit came to be disposed off by the impugned judgment and decree, the Bombay City Civil Court did not pass the necessary order of discharge of the Court Receiver. Consequently, he has continued to be the Receiver of the suit business and premises. The order as regards the discharge of the Court Receiver is therefore required to be passed in the present proceedings and hence the same has been included in the consent terms. 2. The First Appeal is disposed off in terms of the consent terms. [JUDGE]