IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.482 of 2007 BINDESHWARI PRASAD Versus MALA DEVI & ORS ----------- 2. 22.9.2008 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner would seek permission to withdraw this application in order to move the court below for explaining that as a matter of fact he has never agreed to pay Rs. 1500/-. While this Court would not express any opinion on such plea of the petitioner but then it is made clear that on the ground of pendency of this proceeding or again moving the court below he cannot keep the opposite party wife deprived of the amount of maintenance. Therefore, whatever order may be passed may be only made operative in future and the petitioner must pay the arrear amount till the impugned order is so revised. With the aforementioned observation this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/