IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17867 of 2010 SARESH SINGH @ SARVESH KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 31.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in a case under section 392 of the I.P.C. The petitioner submits that he is neither named in the FIR nor any stolen material has been recovered from him and he has been arrested on suspicion and on his own confession. Petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2009 and cases lodged against him are prior to 2003. State counsel opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner has antecedent as he is accused in 8 cases mentioned in para 11 of the bail petition itself. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner as above is refused with observation to renew the prayer for bail after two months as he has antecedent. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)