THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9509 of 2011 Date:08.04.2011 Between: P.Laxma Goud and others ..... Petitioners AND The District Collector, Medak and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri C.Pratap Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Consel for respondent Nos.3 and 4: -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent i.e., District Collector, issued vide impugned Order Dt.26-03-2011 vide Proceedings No.657/2011/A1-P, dissolving the Grampanchayath Kandi U/s.250(1) of the Panchayath Raj Act, 1994, which is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and without jurisdiction and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the impugned order of the 1st Respondent and pleased to permit the Petitioner and others to act as Upa-Sarpanch and ward members of Kandi Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak District, and pass such other order or orders..” At the hearing, Sri C.Pratap Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his clients to avail appropriate remedy, if they feel aggrieved by the final order that may be passed by respondent No.1. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioners is accepted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.11766 of 2011 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th April, 2011 GHN