IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 OP.No. 36974 of 2001(B) ----------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------------ 1. T.A.JSE, VEE SEVEN ENGINEERING SAW MILL ROAD, KOORKENCHERY P.O., THRISSUR 680 007. 2. T.A.FRANCIS, SUPER MACHINES, SAW MILL ROAD, KOORKENCHERY, THRISSUR 680 007. BY ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.) SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.HARISH R. MENON SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. TRICHUR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR 680001. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.MOHAN C.MENON FOR R1 SRI.V.E.ABDUL GAFOOR,SC,TUDA FOR R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/08/2008, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 8578 OF 2004 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CMP. NO.60474/2001 IN OP. NO.36974/2001 DISMISSED 29.08.2008 SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE ALLOTMENT LETTER NO.A4/3823/TUDA DT. 29.12.1994 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE IST PETITIONER. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE ALLOTMENT LETTER NO.A4/3823/TUDA DT. 29.12.1994 ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 18.1.1995 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 20.1.1995 ISSEUD BY IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE NOTICE OF MEETING DT. 17.12.1999 . EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.A6/3623/96/TUDA DT. 11.2.2000 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE IST PETITIONER. EXT.P7:- COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 1.11.2001 BY THE IST PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- O.P.36974/01 & W.P.(C) No.8578/04 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 29th August, 2008. J U D G M E N T As far as the former writ petition is concerned, the surviving grievance is with regard to the disbursement of accrued interest on the non-refundable deposit to the petitioner. In the latter writ petition, in view of the factual position as admitted in counter affidavit itself, the petitioner submits that in case Room No.15 of Sakthan Thampuram Shopping Complex now available is allotted to the petitioner in lieu of the accrued interest, the petitioner will not make any further claim. There will be a direction to the first respondent to examine the submission made by the petitioner within one month from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the allotment of the room either without insisting for a fresh security deposit or for reimbursement of the accrued interest will also be considered and a decision on those grievances also shall be rendered in the process. The writ petitions are disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- O.P.36974/01 & W.P.(C) No.8578/04 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 29th August, 2008.