IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 5775/2008 Decided on:14.6.2010 _____________________________________________ Ms. Padma Wati and others. …Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P., Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioners, in a nutshell, is that similarly situate persons have been granted selection grade after the judgment rendered by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in TA No. 2/1991 dated 14.10.1996. Petitioners made representation to the Director of Health Services seeking the benefit on the basis of judgment rendered by the learned Tribunal on 14.10.1996. I have gone through the pleadings carefully. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 The interest of justice will be met if the respondents are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in view of the principles laid down in judgment rendered by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in TA No. 2/1991 dated 14.10.1996. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for the release of selection grade as per the judgment rendered by the erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in TA No. 2/1991 decided on 14.10.1996 (Annexure A-1). Needful be done within a period of ten weeks after the production of the certified copy of this judgment. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 14.6.2010 *awasthi*