IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16786 of 2010 1. CHINTA RAI S/O LATE BARAN RAI R/O VILL KHASPUR, P.S.MANER, DISTT-PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATNA 3. ANCHALA AHHIKARI MANER(CIRCLE OFFICER MANER null DANAPUR 4. THE S.D.O.THE (SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER) MANER, DANAPUR, (DANAPUR) 5. LAL MANI DEVI WIDOW OF LATE DHURKHELI RAI R/O VILL KHASPUR, P.S.MANER, DISTT-PATNA ----------- 2. 03.05.2011 The matter has been listed on a motion slip filed at serial zero for disposal. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Anchal Adhakari dated 29.7.2010, directing him to vacate the lands on Khata No. 218, Survey Plot No. 423, alleged to have been illegally occupied by the petitioner and for which Lal Muni Devi had a decree. Failure to do so would lead to forceful eviction. The pleadings in the writ application are not very clear. From the impugned order it appears that there is a Court decree for eviction passed in Eviction Suit No. 9 of 1991. If there is an eviction decree it is required to be executed in accordance with law through the process of Court and not by 2 the Anchal Adhakari in the manner sought to be done. The petitioner further claims that he has title over the lands in question. That the mutation has wrongly been done in the name of Lal Muni Devi and for which he has filed mutation appeal. If the petitioner claims title, there is no pleading in the writ application that he has preferred any appeal against the judgment and decree in Eviction Suit No. 9 of 1991. In the entirety the Court finds it very difficult from the pleadings to decipher the nature of the relief claimed and does not find it possible to issue any positive direction. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)