C^ \y7s Q> &> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) N0. rA^ / 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 ^TY 4J' ^/ ;'^ ^^ -° ^^ 7'^' ^ <7 •>c' .9 ' < fysy^a^y^ f Kfs,. ^'t'S '^'^•^9/ ».- " s^8'"^8-' "'••'^^..v^'" . 6. r\ ^' ).}i -^- Suresh Kumar Thakur, S/o. Late Shri Ram Swarup Singh Thakur, aged about 57 years, R/o. Maitri Nagar, Tehsil & District- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of Cooperation, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. Raipur (C.G.) Ashwini Kumar Tiwari, S/o. Shri B.P. Tiwari, aged about 56 years, Occupation- Additional Assistant Manager, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Head Office, Raipur (C.G.) Laxmi Nath Sharma, S/o. Shri R.S. Sharma, aged about 47 years, Occupation- Brach Manager, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Marketing Section, Head Office Raipur (C.G.) Sevak Ram Hardel, S/o. Late Shri Milap Hardel, aged about 45 years, Occupation- .Branch Manager and Nodal Officer Dhamtari, Head Quarter- Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) Bhog Nath Patel, S/o. Shri Dayaram Patel, aged about- 46 years, Occupation- Branch Manager and Nodal Officer, Mahasamund, Head Quarter- Mahasamund, .District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 1-T ^ ^ C9 WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mcm COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETmON (S) No. 1126 of20(» PETITIONER : SureshKumarThakur. VERSUS RESPONDENT8 : State ofChhatti^aih & Ottiers. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF SB: Hon'Me Shri Sadsh K. Aanthntri. J. Present: Stei Sunil Otwani, Advocatefar the petftioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Depdy Govemment Adwcate f<x Ifae State. Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate for the respwidenl No. 2. ORALOMWR (Paissed on 18"' day of January, 2010) 1. Shri Vama, leamed counsel appeaimg for the respon<tal No. 2 submits that Ihe case ofthe petttioner would be conMdered for promotion from fhe post ofBraneh Manager, Gfflde II to ft'aach Maaager, Grade I and q)propriate ordera shall be passed witfain a period ofei^it wedcs from today. 2. In view ofthe above, acwrdiag to Shri Otwani, leamed eounsel appeansg for the petitioner, nothit^ survives fcr adjudfcation ia ttus petition. 3. Accardingly, the writpetition is dffiposed of. No order asto easts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Am^