WP No.10904/10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10904 OF 2010 Arun s/o. Kondiram Dhus, R/o. Devlali Parvara, Tq. Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar. ....Petitioner. Versus Devlali Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Limited At Devlali Paravara, Tq. Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar Through its Manager. ....Respondent. Mr.V.D. Hon, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : A.A.SAYED, J. DATED : 10th December, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Writ Petition is filed, challenging the interim order dated 30.10.2010 passed by Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court, Mumbai, Bench at Aurangabad, whereby the appeal filed by the respondent came to be allowed, thereby reversing the order of the Trial Court, which had directed the respondent to sanction the loan to the petitioner. 3. The petitioner had applied to the respondent - Society for WP No.10904/10 2 sanction of loan, he being the member of the Respondent - Society. The Trial Court has, by an interim order, directed the Society to sanction the loan and disburse the loan amount to the petitioner, after compliance of the necessary procedure within a stipulated period. That order came to be set aside by the impugned order of the Appeal Court, which is challenged in this petition. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that the order, which is impugned, is an interim order, and if the reliefs as prayed in the petition are granted, would tantamount to deciding the dispute itself. In my view, it would be appropriate that the dispute itself is decided by the Trial Court within a stipulated period. 5. In the circumstances, the Trial Court i.e. Judge, Co-operative Court at Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednager, is directed to decide the dispute ABN Case No. 312/2010 within a period of three months from today. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion insofar as merits of the case is concerned. [ A. A. SAYED, J. ] ssc/wp10904.10