IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 1141 of 2001 Between: M/s Siera Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner, T.Prabhu, S/o. Narashimchary, Hindu, Repy. by Partner T.Kishan, S/o. Narashmhachary, aged 35 years, R/o. 2-21144/8/2, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 C.S.R/Arbitrator/Deputy Registar of Co-Operativie Socities, City Circle, Hyderabad. 2 The manager, Aryan Co-Operative-Urban Bank Limited, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad. 3 The Presiding Officer, Co-Operative Tribunal, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass a writ order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records leading upto and inclusive of the order passed by the Third Respondent in I.A.No. 1049 of 2000 in C.T.A.Sr.No.5711 of 2000, order dated 27-11-2000 and Quash the Said order by issuing an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of "Certiorari" and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.DURGA NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.1141 OF 2001 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 13.11.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. _____________ 14-11-2008 asp