!<= HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR [^ M.C.C.No.04of2009 AwpUcaiit/ Petitioner M/s Shri Bhawam Food Products-, Through: Its Partner Narsing Das Bhootda, S/o Late Shri Madan Lal Ji Bhootda, aged about 48 years, Registered Office at Chandrakhuri, DistrictDurg(CG). VERSUS Resppndents 1. Central Bank of India A compaay corporate, Constituted underthe Banking Compames (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970, Throu^i The Managing Director, Head Qffice at Chandramukhi, Nariman Point Mumbai (Maharashtra). 2. The Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Qffice, Raipur (CG). 3. Branch Manager Ceirtral Bank of India, Branch Durg at Rungta Bhawan, GE Road, Durg, District Chhattisgarh (CG). (Application for correction oftypographical mistake in order dated 05.12.08) fSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Asnihotri, J.) Present Shri P.R. Patankar, Advocate forthe applicant/petitioner. None for fhe respondents. \ \ \ ORALORyER (Passed on 14th day ofJanuary, 2009) 1, The petitioner, by fhis petition, seeks correction of typographical mistakes crept in fhe order dated 05.12.08 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1811/08. 2. Qn hearing leamed counsel appearing fbr Ifae applicant, and perusal offhe ' papers, it is evident that inadvertently some typographical mistakes have arept , in m para 2 ofthe order dated 05.12.08. The same may be read as under: "Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner suhmits that fhe instant petition was filed on the ground that no Presiditig Officer in Debts Recovery Tribunal (fbr short 'DRT') at Jabalpur was available to hear tilie matter. He further submits that flie respondent Bank has already filed an application being OA- No. 140/03 under Section 19 of fhe Securitization and Reeonstruction ofFinaiicial Assets and Enforcem^it ofSecurity Interest Act, 2002 (fbr short fhe Act, 2002'), before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpiir (for short 'DRT, Jabalpurt), against the recovery proceedmes. andthe ^ame is oendms consideration." '^- 3. In para 4 also, fhe word 'tfaat since Ihe petitioner has already prefeired an :,^ appeal" may be read as ''tiiat since fhe respondent Bank has already prcferred aa application". 4. In para 5, the word "and iurther tfaat the petitioner has already filed an appeal" may be read as "and further fhat fhe respondeixt Baiik has already filed aii application". 5. Further, tiie word "to pursue fhe pending appeal" may be read as "to pursue fhe pending application". 6. rFhe order dated 05.12.2008 shall be amended by fhis order aft^ correction of typographical mistakes, a new certified copy ofthe order may be issuedL 7. Accordingly, fhis petition is disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ Axnit