IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 17TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 25368 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. N.ABDUL RASHEED, S/O.ALAVI, NEELANGATH HOUSE, PO, EDARIKKODE MALAPPURAM 676 501. 2. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR, SREYAS, VELIMUKKU PADIKKAL, MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER/THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, KOZHIKODE DIST. 2. V.S.RAJASEKHARAN, S/O.SHANMUGAM, DOOR NO.17/638, OPPOSITE SABHA SCHOOL, PAVAMANI ROAD, KOZHIKODE. 3. N.M.PERUMAL, T.C.31/44,KOLUTHURAPPALLY HOUSE, MANGATTU LANE, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CITY TRAFIC, KOZHIKODE CITY. GOVT. PLEADER K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.25368 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 8th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioners challenge Ext.P12 order of the Secretary, RTA, Vatakara, wherein the timings of the 2nd respondent's stage carriage had been revised as directed in Ext.P11 judgment. When it was put to the counsel for the petitioners that a revision would lie against Ext.P12 order before the Tribunal under Section 90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the counsel for the petitioners would contend that in so far as Ext.P12 order has been passed in accordance with Ext.P11 judgment, a revision would be a futile exercise. He would contend that Ext.P11 order has been obtained by fraud and Ext.P12 is liable to be set aside on that ground. In so far as Ext.P11 judgment stands, I do not think that Ext.P12 order, which has been passed as directed in Ext.P11 judgment, can be faulted. If the petitioners have got a case that Ext.P11 judgment is wrong, the remedy of the petitioners lies in filing a petition to review that judgment after obtaining leave to file review petition or to file an appeal against Ext.P11 after obtaining leave to file appeal. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2