IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10148 of 2008 Suresh Ram, son of Baldeo Ram, resident of Village-Bithaur Thakur Tola, P.S. Pandaul, District-Madhubani. ………………………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Priyanka, wife of Umesh Kumar Ram, resident of Village-Thakur Tola Bithaur, P.S. Pandaul, District- Madhubani. ………………………………………Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner: M/s. N.A. Shamsi and Rashid Rais, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2 : M/s. Shakeel Ahmad Khan & Md. Nurul Hoda, Advocates. --------------------------------- 4. 16.9.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no.2. The petitioner has preferred this application, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for quashing the F.I.R. of Madhubani (Town) P.S. Case No.98 of 2005 dated 11.4.2005 lodged against the petitioner and five others for the offence under Sections 364, 366 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the victim, Priyanka, daughter of the informant, 2 Dashrath Veyar, and the petitioner were living in the same complex as tenant and due to love affair developed between them, they performed the marriage and they also got the marriage registered at Delhi. It has also been submitted that the victim, Priyanka, also gave birth to a female child on 21.8.2006. It is further submitted that the victim, Priyanka, also filed a petition before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, stating therein that her husband-petitioner and his family members have falsely been implicated in this case by her father. In fact, she has performed her marriage with the petitioner out of her own sweet will. From perusal of the records, it appears that the police on investigation in Madhubani (Town) P.S. Case No.98 of 2005 has submitted final form with conclusion that the case is untrue. As such, no question arise to quash the F.I.R. in a proceeding under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, I find no merit in this application and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. P.S. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)