HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH, BIL^PUR ^ PETITIONBR RESPONDBNTS W.P. (81 No.6192/2007 MaDiaakhaa Lal Yadav S/o Tban Siagh Yadav, aged about 60 years, permanent Gaaginaa iu P.W.D., Diu^, R/o viUage & post Nikiun, TahsU Ss Distt. Dm^ (C.G.) ycrsus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, PubUc Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub- Division-1, PubUc Works Department, Dui^ (C.G). /' WMT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTXOM OP INDIA Appearance: Shri Sanjay Patel, Couasel for fhe petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate aad Deputy Advocate General with Shri A.S. Kachliwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORM, ORDBR (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR StNHA, J. Heard, Leamed couusel for ftie petitioner submits fhat a permaaent Gaag-man is to be retired at fhe scge of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shasidya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiruyam 196^ read wifh Fundam.ental Rules, 56. He also submits that the poiat raised has been decided by this Court ia bateh ofmatters i.e, W.P. No.108/2005 aud iiiaay ofher connected inatters on 04.01.2007, reported tu 2007 12) C.G.L.J. 29 (Goidnd Ss Others -w. State afC.G. dnd others) and fhis inatter is squarely covered by fhat decision, which may be disposed ofon the sa.me tenns. ft t- Rao/ Shyna W.P.(S)No.6192/2007 53' Leamed counsel for fhe State fairly agrees that fbte inatter is covered by fhe said decision. However, he subuuts that ia some matters the State has filed writ appeals. Uiiless some iuterixa order is passed, merely on accouat of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of fhis writ petition cannot be kept in abeyauce, when the aiatter 1s squarely covered by the said judgment. In fhe result, ttus petition is aUowed. It is disposed of iu terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed ia W.P. No. 108/2005 aud other coimected matters. No order as to cost. ,\ i . • .• '. '..•'• OU/-:.,' .:• SiinilKuinai'iSiaha Jlidge