1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 6110 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4826 OF 1988 Dattatreya Anant Nerurkar & Ors. .. Petitioners.. Vs. Sulochana Mahadeo Rane & Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Amrita Patil i/by M/s. K.P. Tiwari & Co. for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Patil i/by Mr. A.K. Abhyankar for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 5 to 7.. CORAM : J. N. PATEL, J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST, 2009. (IN CHAMBER AT 2.45 P.M.) P.C. : . This application has been filed which is purported to be a review petition seeking reconsideration of the order passed by this Court on 11.8.2000 dismissing the writ petition preferred against the decision of the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. 2 2. The review petitioner (original defendant/tenant) has impugned the order of the Appellate Court of Small Causes Court which granted a decree for ejectment and possession in favour of the respondent-landlord under clause 13 (1 (g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The appellate judgment and order of the Small Causes Court is a finding of fact borne out of the record and, therefore, this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction dismissed the petition. 3. The review petitioner has failed to demonstrate any error apparent on the face of the record so as to call for review and, therefore, the review petition is dismissed with costs. 4. In view of the fact that the review petition has been dismissed, interim orders, if any, stand vacated. ( J. N. PATEL, J.)