Cr.Misc. M30362 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M30362 of 2011 Date of decision: 14.12.2011 Subhash Singh petitioner vs State of Haryana respondent Present:- Mr. Sarfraz Hussain, Advocate Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Hry Mr. RS Hooda, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI, J. This order will dispose of three connected petitions for pre- arrest bail filed by Subhash Singh (Cr.Misc. M 30362 of 2011), Ashok Kumar (Cr.Misc. M 31750 of 2011) and Abdul Hamid (Cr.Misc. M 34530 of 2011). The allegations in the FIR, registered at the instance of Jamaluddin, are that on the basis of a fraudulent mutation in the names of Ram Singh and Jagdish, an agreement of sale was executed in favour of Subhash Singh. The said agreement of sale was cancelled and subsequently another agreement was executed in faovur of Kasamdin. So far as Subhash Singh is concerned, it appears that no prejudice has been caused to the complainant as the petitioner has not achieved any wrongful gain on the basis of the alleged agreement of sale. He has joined the investigation. Similarly, petitioners Ashok Kumar and Abdul Hamid are Govt. employees. They had allegedly changed the revenue record. It has Cr.Misc. M30362 of 2011 2 been brought to the notice of the court that the petitioner Ashok Kumar while working as a Patwari, had immediately corrected the inadvertent mistake and caused no prejudice to the complainant. Petitioners Ashok Kumar and Abdul Hamid have also joined the investigation. It does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation. Accordingly, all the three petitions are allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners, they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that they will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. December 14 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE