MC 853/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. AR Sikdar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. G. Uzir, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner. The department is repres ented by its standing counsel Mr. U.K. Goswami. This application for impleadment is filed by contending that the applicant has b een appointed as the In-charge Headmaster of the Pub-Chatla (M) M.E. Madrassa, a fter the writ petitioner was removed from the post due to his prolonged absence and the applicant is currently serving as In-charge Headmaster. The learned coun sel accordingly submits that he is a vitally interested party in the writ procee ding where the terminated Headmaster is seeking sanction of financial benefits. Having regard to the above and after consideration of the submission of the lear ned counsel, the Misc. Case stands allowed and the applicant Maheswar Nath is pe rmitted to be impleaded as respondent No.5 in WP(C) No. 858/2011. Office to make necessary correction in the cause title.