IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27979 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.08.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the informant. This application has been filed for modification of the order sated 18.1.2010 in Cr. Misc. no. 39573 of 2009. The petitioner- husband in a complaint case under Sections 494 and 498A of the Penal Code along with Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act was granted anticipatory bail for a period of six months noticing the submission of the desirability for revival of matrimonial harmony. Directions were given that any application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit in light of the intervening developments and respective attitude of the parties. In the present application the informant has appeared suo motu and has filed a counter affidavit also. Counsel for the informant stands by the statement in para 4 of the same that she is willing for revival of the matrimonial harmony also. In the nature of the order passed on the earlier occasion and upon perusal of the order dated 26.7.2010 this Court is not satisfied that sufficient ground has been made out for modification of its earlier order. To that extent there is no merit in this application and the same is fit to be rejected. This Court cannot loose sight of the fact that the complaint case essentially arises out of a matrimonial dispute. The parties appear to be desirous to resolve the controversy. It shall be the duty of the Court to aid them in the process and not pass an order in a mechanical manner which may thwart any possibility of revival of matrimonial harmony. This application is therefore disposed with the observation made in presence of the Counsel for the parties to which both of them have agreed, that the parties in person shall appear on 24.8.2010 before the Court of SDJM Jehanabad where the criminal prosecution is stated to be pending. If the complainant stands by her submission for revival of matrimonial harmony, this Court expects the regular bail application of the petitioner to b e taken up the same day in the light of the developments that may take place before the SDJM. The issues of regular bail/provisional bail shall remain open for consideration by him in his discretion. Let this order be communicated by fax at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner to the Court of SDJM Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 139 of 2009. This application is disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)