IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9037 of 2007 ANITA KUMARI, wife of Satyaprakash Singh, resident of village & P.O. Daudnagar, P.S. Vaishali and District Vaishali. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.District Magistrate, Vaishali 3.District Welfare Officer, Vaishali 4.Block Development Officer, Block Vaishali, District Vaishali. 5.Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Daudnagar, Block Vaishali, District Vaishali. 6.Mala Kumari, @ Mala Gupta Wife of Om Prakash Sah, resident of village Daudnagar, p.S. Vaishali and District Vaishali. ----------- 2 27/11/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “That this writ application is being filed for directing the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika of the new Kendra in village Daudnagar in District Vaishali and for all consequential reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled during course of hearing of this writ application.” With reference to the aforementioned relief counsel for the petitioner would submit that the husband of the petitioner had initially moved the Collector of the 2 district assailing selection of respondent no.6 on the various grounds, but no action was taken by the Collector, as a result whereof the petitioner was compelled to file this writ application. In the opinion of this Court, few cause of actions are personal. This is a matter of appointment of Anganbari Sevika where initially the aggrieved person has a right to move the Collector with regard to illegality in the process of selection and appointment of Anganbari sevika. Admittedly, the petitioner has never moved the Collector and the representation filed by her husband was not worth taking cognizance. That being so, this writ application by the petitioner relying on the representation of her husband also is not maintainable. In any event, this Court would find that the petitioner has not moved against the illegalities in selection of respondent no.6 before the Collector of the district and therefore this Court would grant leave to the petitioner to file a representation before the Collector of the district, who thereafter will pass an appropriate order but only after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no.6 a also the representative of the concerned Gram Panchayat. Such exercise must be completed within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation by the 3 petitioner. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)