1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2180, 2181 & 2189 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2180, 2181 & 2189 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Shri Jadhav for petitioner/ workmen. 2. Learned Member of Industrial Court has refused interim relief. The interim relief sought is in relation to show cause notice issued prior to ordering suspension. After this and during pendency of proceedings before the Industrial Court actual suspension pending inquiry has been ordered on 3rd December, 2010. The petitioner has not amended his U.L.P. complaint to incorporate challenge to his suspension pending inquiry. The show cause notice dated 26th July, 2010 though does not expressly used words "pending inquiry" from its tenor it is apparent that the respondents have given petitioner an opportunity to show cause why he should not be suspended pending departmental inquiry. 3. In this view of the matter, I do not see 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 2180, 2181 & 2189 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. any jurisdictional error or perversity in the approach of Industrial Court. The petitions are, therefore, rejected. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:22/03/2011. ans/2180