1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 12399 of 2008 Decided on: 12.5.2011 Rajinder Kumar & others .….Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & others ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioners. : None. For the respondents : Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Bhupender Thakur, Advocate for respondent No. 2. None for respondent No. 3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) As far as the question of conferment of work charge status upon the petitioners is concerned, the same is no more res integra in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court rendered in a judgment in CWP No. 5907 of 2010, titled as Sukh Chain versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others alongwith other connected matters, decided on 4th May, 2011. However, it shall be open to the respondents to consider the case(s) of the petitioners for regularization, in accordance with law. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No 2 2. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. May 12, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge