1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2010. Nilkanth Sakharam Dube and another. -: VERSUS :- Government Labour Officer & Election Officer and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 04, 2010. Heard Shri B.M. Khan, learned Counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.P. for respondent no.1 and Shri Raghotre, learned Counsel for respondent no.2. None appears for respondent nos.3 to 7. Contention of Shri Khan, learned Counsel for petitioners is, elected representative from 2005 onwards and in 2009 were malafidely removed only to enable the management to get rid of their services. His contention is, application seeking leave to terminate them is already filed and is pending before the Labour Court. 2 Learned A.G.P. as also Advocate Raghorte, learned Counsel for respective respondents oppose the arguments. They state that the application for permission as filed is in the year 2005 and in 2009 the workers by majority have passed a vote of no confidence against both the petitioners and elected two representatives to substitute them. I have perused the record. Record show that in elections conducted on 03.03.2009 petitioners were elected as representatives and their normal tenure was therefore to expire in 2011. However, on 03.10.2009 majority of workers have expressed no confidence in petitioners and substituted them by two more persons employees. The proceedings are recorded by the Government Labour Officer. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in exercise of writ jurisdiction. However, the contentions about malafide exercise, is kept open for consideration in appropriate proceedings at appropriate stage. Writ Petition is disposed of, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.