IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2009 / 31ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 8242 of 2009(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. V.N.NARAYANAN, S/O.A.S.NARAYANANKUTTY - MENON BUSINESS,AGED 46 YEARS,RESIDING AT NARAYANEEYAM,KODAMTHURUTHU MURI OF KODAMTHURUTHU VILLAGE, KUTHIYATHODU P.O. CHERTHALA. 2. P.A.NARAYANAN,S/O.APPU, BUSINESS, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,RESIDING AT VELEEPPARAMBIL, KUTHIYATHODU P.O.,CHERTHALA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN SMT.KALA G.NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHERTHALA. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CHERTHALA. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,POLICE STATION CHERTHALA. 5. T.S.BABY,S/O.SREEDHARAN, POLITICIAN, AGED ABOUT 45,KULATHRAKKATTU, C.M.C.IV,CHERTHALA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.8242 of 2009 EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED IN THE NAME OF FIRST PETITIONER BY CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY DATED 7.5.2008. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT CHERTHALA ON 31.1.2009. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY FIRST PETITIONER BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 16.2.2009. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 17.2.2009. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 17.2.2009. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT OF ACCEPTANCE OF EXT.P5 COMPLAINT ISSUED TO THE FIRST PETITIONER BY SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 17.2.2009. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER ON 11.3.2009 BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN EXT.P1 SUIT CLAIMING POLICE PROTECTION DATED 11.3.2009. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8242 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The first petitioner purchased a residential building from the housing board. The second petitioner is doing the renovation work to the existing residential building of the first petitioner. It is alleged that the fifth respondent is causing obstruction to the said work demanding money and doing all sorts of mischiefs. What type of mischief is not stated. Hence, this writ petition seeking police protection. 2. This Court has issued notice by speed post to respondents 4 and 5. In spite of the same, they did not turn up. Hence, we are constrained to give necessary directions to the police, as follows. W.P.(C) No.8242 of 2009 2 3. If there is any threat from the fifth respondent, either to the life of the petitioners or their family members, or in the matter of renovation work of residential building of the first petitioner, police shall interfere, and if found true, give necessary protection. The rest of the dispute, if any, shall have to be adjudicated between the parties through the civil court. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.