^ -•-p fsfSis *Wi-£ ff^g^ ^^, IN THE HIGH COURT QFCHHAniSGARH AT BILASPUR (CC51 WRIT PETITION.IS) NO.^HS^ /2006 PETITIONER ^ ^J^( ^s^ ^"'fc'^X^ ,./^"^- ^^•:<e^\...--" ^*-^ ^Trilok Singh Nag, aged about 39 years, son 6f Shri Langha Ram Nag, Assistcint Tedcher, GovernFnent Primary School, Lohrapahi, Vikas Khand: Lailungq, Tal-i. Gharghora, District RdigarM (C.G.) ' VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - SeeretaFy, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan . Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (CG) Bloek Education Officer, Vikas Khand Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (CG) ^^ :• _ ' , . WRIT PETITIQN U/A.226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,' . RESPONDENTS ^^ /.y'^^^ •s ^ •V. HI6H COl«TOF CHNATT3S6ARH Af KEI..ASPUR WP.rslhto. 7137/2006 Petitioner : Trilok Singh Nag Versus Respondents : Stateof Chhatt-isgarh and others SB:Hon'bleMr.JusticeSatishK.Agnihotri.J Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate forthepetitioner. ^ M.r. Arun &ao, fiovernroent Advocate for the respondents/State. Oft&ER (Passwl on 21st day of Oecember. 2006) ThefollowingorderoftheCourtispasaedbySatishK. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsal appear'mg for +he petitioner as well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearing for the rsspondents/State jointly abmit thcrt' the faclsof the present^case au^ similar to^^l^^ in W. P. (5) No. 6479 of 2006 (Svshil Kumar Shukla Vs. State of Qthatt'isgorh & o'thars), which was di^>osedl o'f vide order dated 25 of November, 2006. They further submit that the question df law invoh/ed is atso+he same. x 2. In viewof -theabove stated submissions made by lecmed counset for the part-ies, this petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 25* of Hovsmbw, 2006 passed by this Gourt in W. P. (5) No. 6479 of 2006. No order as tocosts. Bdbfu Sd/- Satish K. Agnibotri Judge