1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT F3ENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CCC NO.3020 OF 2010 (VL iCte- Vi?. C± 1tS1 2 _ BETWEEN: 1. SRI.HERMAIEN ENTERPRISES REP BY ITS PROP. SRI.SYED MOHD. IMAMUDDIN Sb SYED ABDUL MANNAN AGE: 32 YEARS. 0CC: BUSINESS R/O NO.5-408/5/09, NEAR BIBI ROZA COLLEGE, MADEENA COLONY, GULBARGA 2. M/s. BRIGHT ENTERPRISES REP. BY ITS PROP. SRI.MOHD.IMTLAZUDDIN S/O BADERUDDIN AGE: 34 YEARS. 0CC: BUSINESS R/0 N0.5-408/4H, KHAZA COLONY GULBARGA 585 104 3. M/s. RABSHAN ENTERPRISES REP BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SMT.ZAHIDA BEGUM W/O SYED ABDUL MANNAN AGE: 58 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS I 2 R/O NO.5-408/51. MADEENA COLONY GULBARGA 585 104 . COMPLAINANTS (BY SRLAMRESH S.ROJA, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY SRLM.RKAMBLE IRRIGATION DEPT.. NO.642 C’ BLOCK, M.S.BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560001 2, SRLSADASHIVA REDDY B.PATIL THE CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT ZONE/KNNL GULBARGA, GULBARGA DIST. 3. SRI.MALLIKARJUNA SAHU THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT, CANAL DIVISION NO.1, GULBARGA GULBARGA DISTRICT 4. SRI.K.G.MAHERS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION PROJECT CANAL DIVISION NO.IV, HEBBAL/KNNL CHIYI’APUR TALUK, GULBARGA DIST. . , .ACCUSED (SRI.S.S.KUMMAN. GOVT. ADV. FOR Al SRI.GOURISH S.KASHEMPUR. ADV. FOR A2-A4) This CCC is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the accused in WP No.28494-497/03 dated 5.11.03 under the Contempt Act, in the interest ofjustice and equity. / 3 This CCC coming on for orders today, Mr.N.K.PATIL, J. made the following: ORDER In the instant contempt petition, the complainant prays to initiate contempt. proceedings in view of disobedience of the order dated 5.11.2003 passed in WP Nos.28494-497/2003 against the accused. 2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the complainant and the learned counsel appearing for accused Nos.2 to 4. 3. The learned counsel for accused Nos.2 to 4 submitted that, the order has been complied with and to that effect, they have filed a counter affidavit and also filed the order dated 6.9.2010. Therefore, he submitted that,. the contempt petition filed by the complainant against the accused may be dropped. 4. The learned counsel for the complainant submitted that, the submission of the learned counsel for accused Nos.2 to 3 4 may be placed on record. Hence, the said submission is placed on record. 5. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for both the parties. the instant contempt petition filed by the complainant stands dropped. If still the complainant is dissatisfied with the order passed by the competent authority. he may file necessary application before the appropriate legal forum. 6. With the above observation, the instant contempt petition filed by the complainant stands disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Sal JUDGE Sd/ JUDGE 1W