13i.. ^^ 5fe*.. ^ ^ - ." C ^" ( <?"6' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fSl No. CTS^^ /2007 PETITIONER ^>s^ v^:-'\oy ...•••'M^"' ;.'-,.;-Y^-- -,f .'• .•<•• .^" V/ : Paras Lal Lahre S/o. Shri GuJLu Ram Lahre <!h—' Aged about 45 years Post-Assistant Teacher R/o. Village -Faraswani, Tahsil Kartala & District Korba (C.G.) VERSU^ RESPONDENTS :1 o r\'».-' ^>^ ^^y <&• .<"' V-'jV^iy-f, j 'i \^..''^\^i3U-^ -2. WRIT PETITION State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Kbrba District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block-Kartala District-Korba (C.G.) U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS KE6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 956 of 20)7 Petitioner : Paros Lnl Lahre Versus Respondents Stnte of Chhatt'isgarh A others Single Bench: Honble Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Anil Mourya, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jam, Panel Lau»yerfor the State/respondents. ORDER ffassed on this 20th Day of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appea.r'mg for the petitioner submits Ihat the petitioner is workmg as Assistcnt Teacher in -rtie Sovemment Middle School Faraswani, Btock-l&rtata, Oistrict-Korba. The petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Examination certificate on 12-6-1986, on his own expenses. ^- 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question invotved, herein asto whether the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Examination Cert'ificate on his own expenses, is entitled to two advance increments. According to leamed cowise.l for the petitior»r, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of Ihis Court in the cose pf yashwant Kumar Bharadwqj Vs. Municyal Corporation. Durg and another {2006 (11) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the coise of Yashwont Kumar Bharodwcy Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (5upru), came to the conclusion that Ihe teachers, who had ob-hained B. Ed. /B.TJ. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by the circufair dated 24.12.98 issued by -the State Sovemment of Madhya Prodesh. Leamed coiuisel for the petitioner furrtier submits -that Ihe facts and question of faw involved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court in -the case of Yeshwwvt Kunwt' BharaA»<y Vs. Municipal Corporation, Ourg cund another (Supra), to which leamed counsel afipearmg for the raq»ondaits fairty concedes cBid agrees with Ihe c «rmentmade by leamed coundel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, 1tie writ petition is allowed in terms of the orckr passed in the case of yashwant K»wor Kiaradwcij Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg ond another (Supra), aibject to verification of the fact as to »»hetherIhe petitioner has acquiped B.Ed. Examination Certificorteon his ourn expenses as per the circuturs dated 24.12.1998 d 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 5ubhash Sd/- SatishK-Agnihom Judge