IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7407 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 Meenu Arora .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The case of the petitioner is that she was working as Guest Teacher from which post she has been relieved for the reason that the school has reduced the workload. As per the counsel, the workload is there and this is only a conjecture and surmise to relieve the petitioner. Let the petitioner make a representation to the respondents and her claim be considered for taking her back into service in terms of the policy so formulated, if workload for the said post is available. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 7, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE