^^iKRUP@ BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C No. ^13^ /2011 APPLICANT Fl: " •^. KuntiBai, W/o Shlok Patel, aged about 24 years, R/o ,^-^ Village Panchayat ^^» Chhantajha, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS ''s?^'-^ o^""' \v\^ RESPONDENTS 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through: Presiding Officer, Nayab Tahsildar, Kawardha, DistrictKabirdham (C.G.) 2. Collector, Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue),Kawardha (C.G.) 4. Tarkeshwar Prasad, S/o Panchram Kaushik, Up- Sarpanch Village Panchayat Chhantajha, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 5. Vishnu Kumar, S/o Anup Singh, 6. Rajesh Kumar, S/o Geetau Ram Satnami, 7. Dhamlal, S/o Kuntaram Dhurve, 8. Umabai, W/o Bisen Kaushik, 9. Smt. Anita Bai, W/o Dinesh Kaushik, 10. Smt. Gangabai, W/o Budhari Gond, <f^ 11. Smt. Ratnabai, W/o NandkumarSahu, 12. Smt. Suruchibai, W/o Shiv Kumar Kewat, 13. Smt. Kumari Bai, W/o Ramavtar Jaiswal, 14. Smt. Gangabai, W/o Galichand Marar, 15. Sautar Bai, W/o Kirtan Patel, 16. Dhansingh, S./o Bisru Yadav, 17. Ramanuj, S/o Nainsukh Kaushik, 18. Smt. Ganeshiya Bai, W/o Santdas Navrange, 19. Smt. Girija Bai, W/o Lalaram Nai, 20. Taran, S/o Gunagar Kaushik 21. Chain Prasad, S/o Narmada Jaiswal, Respondent No. 4 to 21 all are Panch, Village Panchayat Chhantajha, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION W.P.(C) N0.5867/2011 The above named applicant begs to submit as under:- c' H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH^ATBlLASPUR M.C.C.No.731 OF 2011 Appiicant : Kunti Bai VERSUS ResponcSents : State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPL!CATSON FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.(C) N0. 5867/2011 .SBi_Hon;'bie Shri Satssh K. Aanihotri. J^ Present: Shrl Basant Dswangan, Advocate for the appiicant. Shri Arun Sao. Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passsd on thls 21st day of October, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appiicant submits that the counsei for the petltioner couid not appear on account of bonaflde mistake, therefore, W.P.(C) No. 5867/2011, which was dssmissed on 10th October, 2011, may be restored to its fiie. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 5867/2011, is restored to the original fiie subject to payment of Rs.1500/- as cost payable to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. 3. A copy of this order be pl^ced on record of the origina! writ petltion and the same be iisted for hearing. . 1 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ash^