INTKEmGHJlQURT.QF JUDICATURI.AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETITION N.0. •100^ /2.0e2 PETn-IONER Tobacco Employees Uoion throiigh its Vics-President Abdiii Rashid, S/o Abdu! Tahir, aged 34 yea'rs, R/o wttl, J'anta Quart.er, Padmanabhpur, Durg (C.G.). -VERSUS. RESPONDENTS ^ .^ft -^^ ..-.y ^.'.^y -•^ ,^ 1. 2. 3. "4. Umoii ofliidia tSirou^h Secret^iry, Departmem ofFioanca, New Delhi. Commis^iouer, Centrai Excise, New Deihi. Superinteadeiit, Customs and ^-entral -Sxcise, 'Range Durg (C.G.5. State of|Chhattisgarli through Secr^ta!^ D^paitmeiit ofLabour, D.K.S.Bhavan.B.aipur. Secreta!^, D'epartment .of Revenu^, State ofChhattiggarh, D.K.S.Bhavaa.Raipur. Laboiir Comiiiissioner. CTOvernmeBt- of Clihattisgarh, Raipur. Deputy Labour Cc^mmissionsi, State ofChtiattisgarh, Raipur. Colie-ctor^ Dum< Agsistant Labo'ar Conmiissioaer,. Durg. Taiisildat Durg. M.P. Tobacco Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies Ac.t, .1956, Registration ao. 39761 of 1985, having its Office at Ptiuigaon, Potia Road, Durg (C.G.) through its Director Manohar Ram. S/o Prayag Ram, aged about38 years, R/o New Delhi. Bidia. WSIT UND.ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF.THE.CONSTIIUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A 8UITABLE WRIT.ORDE.RS OR DIRECTION. 6. 7. s. 10. 11. r—^f7^^^W t^yr'Un < ^Is.^asy mf.-ar-b--das >3<<- XI-HC-22 3T{^t^T 'f^fW^T}^?! ^HNT^^T ^* ^^^14i<ri^,.0Tl1yltA^^^te 3ti^T 'q^ wiT%wi;-u"e-N°-:-u'tt'/"Wt '^^ST' 200' 3?T^? ^eiTW^TfN 03/01/2003 Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Shri A.S. Gaharwar, Sr.; Counsel fbr Uion of Iiidia/respondej Shri Sanjay K/ Aganval^ respondents no. 4 to; 10. None for respondent no. 11 . It is stated by the learned G^ Revenue Recoverv" Proceedings wer^ respondent no. 10 because the prc] had been confiscated by the Unior) thereto, it is stated)by him, thaf <| would like to bring this' fact to the whom the recovery iproceedings a^ matter/he is permitted to withdrav| move an appropriate application bd of the application should be sei-vec] given sometiine to file a reply and tl^ proceed ox'i merits and in accordar] to whether or not the order of confil C^I14{<n41y1 'HTR^it* ^ W^ ^f^SK ^'|3Tf;?F[3:fr^F ^isel forthe petifioner. Central Governmenf Standing •®- htt nos, 1 t6 3 ion advance copy. Deputy Advocate General for ^unsel for the ipetitioner that the stayed by thle Tahsildar, Durg ~ (perties of the! respondent no. 11 of India. Hawever, subsequent brder has beem set aside and he fiotice of respondent np.IO before |le pending. In this view of the ^ this wnt petition with liberty to fore the Recovery Qfficer. A copy on the employer who should be ^ereafter the Recoveiy Officer is to \ce with law after ascertaining as ^cation has been withdrawn. It is ;^if^; XI-HC-22 /.... w^r^r f<rli^1 3T!t?l ^T^T^feT ^'fc^- .^ "^^J "H^ '^Hi^^, ^te7T^, ft<rti^^< 31T§^T M3<cb ^.^^.^..u^^.f...:^^ ^n-mr ^HI% '^^T' ^rr^? •^iT^'^f^? expected that efforts should be ITI^ within a reasonable period. With the afoiresaid observ^ petition is disposed of as withdr^ 367/2002 for interim relief, I. A.Nj: and I.A.No, 7511/2002 for a directijsn disposed of. Certified copy;as per rules. ^)NM41yi 'WT?if ^ 'ft^ T^RZR ^'^R^fr^i a^de to complete the proceedings .tions and directioris this writ iwn. Consequently, M.W.P.No. 38.3211/20021for urgent hearing to the respQnclenfs also stand Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [Tft^,1fe'^.