1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.104 OF 2009 WITH REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.8984 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.574 OF 2007 Mr. Baban Laxman Bhaigude ...Applicant/Org.Petr. v. Baburao Jakhuji Wakankar Since Deceased 1.Smt. Sarubai Baburao Wakankar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Madhav Jamdar, adv. for the applicant. Shri A.V.Anturkar i/by Sugandh B. Deshmukh, advs. for the respondent nos.2 and 3. AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.107 OF 2009 WITH REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.8980 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.573 OF 2007 Mr.Kundalik Sakharam Dahibhate & Anr. ...Applicants/Org.Petrs. v. Baburao Jakhuji Wakankar Since Deceased 1.Smt. Sarubai Baburao Wakankar & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Madhav Jamdar, adv. for the applicant/Org. Petitioners. Shri A.V.Anturkar i/by Sugandh B. Deshmukh, advs. for the respondent nos.2 and 3. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 20th August , 2009 2 P.C. 1 Mr. Jamdar the learned counsel for the review petitioners seeks to withdraw these applications as well as the review petitions. Mr. Anturkar the learned counsel for the respondents makes a statement that as per the oral directions given by this Court, respondents had served a copy of the plan indicating the area, which would be allotted to the petitioners. The learned counsel for the review petitioners had taken time to consult an architect and to make the statement. This statement is not denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners. However, as the petitioners want to withdraw the review petitions, no objection can be taken by the other side. 2 Therefore, these applications as well as the review petitions stand disposed off as withdrawn. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) 3