1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1113 OF 2009 Shri. Patil Suresh Vishnu .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents A.M. Joshi for the petitioner D.A. Patil, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3 Tejpal S. Ingle for respondent no. 4 CORAM : Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : 20th August, 2009 P.C.: 1. The case of the petitioner is that he is an assistant teacher and he came to be terminated by the respondent management on 15th June, 2007. He challenged the said termination by filing appeal no. 48 of 2007 before the School Tribunal, Kolhapur which came to be dismissed by order dated 29th August, 2008. The case of the petitioner is that he was again terminated on 24th July, 2007 which came to be challenged before the School Tribunal by filing appeal no. Rma wp1113­09.sxw 2 59 of 2007. The said appeal came to be dismissed by the Tribunal by judgment and order dated 29th August, 2008. Even according to the learned advocate for the petitioner, the reason for termination in both these cases is different and he has also filed two separate appeals in respect of both terminations. The judgment and orders are also different. In such case, in my opinion, the petitioner ought to file separate petitions. Hence, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to prefer two separate petitions. (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) Rma wp1113­09.sxw 3 Rma wp1113­09.sxw