IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1923 of 2011. Decided on: 7th April, 2011. Parsu Ram and others …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & ors. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners : Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved since they are not regularized in service. According to them, the case is covered by the decision of this Court in Man Singh vs. State of H.P. rendered in CWP No. 1594 of 2008. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. 3. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows: 4. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter in the light of the decision of this Court in Man Singh’s case (supra) and take appropriate action in accordance with law after verifying the facts within a period -2- of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 7th April, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/K) Judge.