1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No. 4211/2010 Tulsi Ram Sharma & anr Versus State of Rajasthan through PP 28.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SS Hasasn - for petitioners Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused Vimla and Ashok were granted anticipatory bail thus petitioners having same case rather stand on better footing, may be granted bail under section 438 CrPC. Their names did not find place in the FIR, whereas, names of Vimla and Ashok find place in the FIR. It is only by way of subsequent development that petitioners have been involved. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail 2 application moved by the petitioner. He submits that after acceptance of bail application of Vimla and Ashok this court dismissed bail application of Jagdish and others. Injured received multiple injuries. Names of petitioners have come subsequently during course of investigation. Hence, their bail application may be dismissed. After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, the bail application is dismissed. However, petitioners would be at liberty to surrender before the court concerned. On surrender, if they file bail application before the court concerned, the court concerned is directed to decide the same expeditiously. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma