1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2629 OF 2010 Shaikh Ejaj S/o Shaikh Yusuf } Age : 33 Years, Occ. : Unemployed } R/o : Nagar Road, Beed. } District : Beed. } .... PETITIONER V E R S U S 1. The State of Maharashtra } Through its Secretary, } General Administration Department, } Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32. } 2. The Secretary } Medical Education & Drugs } Department, Mantralaya, } Mumbai. } 3. Associate Dean } Sri J.J.Group of Hospitals & } Grant Medical College, } Mumbai. } .... RESPONDENTS Mr. N.P.Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N.B.Khandare, Govt. Pleader for State. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 19/04/2010 2 ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER – S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. Vide the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought directions against respondent no. 3 to decide the representation dated 16/1/2009. 3. In view of the fact that the limited prayer has been made and that the representation made by the petitioner is pending consideration with respondent no. 3 since 16/1/2009, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent no. 3 to decide the said representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within period of eight weeks from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 4. Rule is thus made absolute n the above terms with no order as to costs. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 2629.10 ( J ) 3