IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11417 of 2010 CHHOTELAL SAH, SON OF MISHRILAL SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAJHARI, P.S. NIRMALI, DISTRICT-SUPAUL…………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. -------- 2. 23.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been lodged against 6-7 unknown persons. The petitioner has been made accused in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, Raghunandan Yadav and Jagat Mukhiya. It has also been submitted that the aforesaid co-accused had already been granted bail by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner produces the certified copy of one of such orders. Let it be kept on record. Learned counsel submits that the - 2 - only suspicion against the petitioner is that the alleged sim card belonging to him had been used in one of the stolen mobile phones. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 22.12.2009. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Chhotelal Sah, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J.M. Railway, Samastipur, in connection with Darbhanga G.R.P, P.S. Case No.35/09, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates - 3 - during the course of the trial in the court below without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)