IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.906 of 2011 Date of decision: 23.05.2011 Joginder Pal …..Appellant versus Financial Commissioner Appeals Punjab and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.Ram Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) C.M. No.2529 of 2011 In view of reasons mentioned in this application, which is accompanied by an affidavit, it is allowed and 10 days delay in filing the appeal stands condoned. LPA No.906 of 2011 It is contention of counsel for the appellant that respondent- Gurmit Singh is not a fit person to be appointed against the post of Lambardar as during his service, he was charge sheeted for a major penalty and ultimately after his retirement, a cut to the extent of 5% in his pension was imposed. It is further stated that suspension period of about six months was treated as a non-duty period. To say so, reference has been made to documents Annexures A1 and A2. Perusal of the order under challenge indicates that this point was raised before the learned Single Judge, however, the same was rejected on a ground that there was no documentary evidence to prove that allegation. LPA No.906 of 2011 Under the circumstances, counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw this writ petition to move an application for review of the order before the learned Single Judge, by putting on record documents Annexures A1 and A2. Ordered accordingly. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 23.05.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge 2