IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 4623 of 2006 Between: K. Sivasankara Rao S/o Venkateswarlu Krishna District Scheduled Castes Services Coop. Society Ltd., Machilipatnam, Krishna District ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 The A.P. State Scheduled Castes Coop. Finance Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad Rep by its Vice-Chairman/Managing Director, Telugu Sankhsema Bhavan, V Floor, Masab Tank, Hyderabad 2 The Krishna District Scheduled Castes Services Coop.Society Ltd., Machilipatnam, Krishna District repby its Chairman/District Collector, .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus by declaring the proceedings in Rc. No. A2/1012/APSC/2004 dated 19-12-2005 issued by the 1st respondent and the consequential proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc. No.7/2001/JA dated 19-01-2006 in relieving the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the G.O.Ms. No. 200 dated 12-09-1985 and also contrary to the orders issued by the Government in Circular Memo No. 18949-A/627/A2/W&M/2005 dated 19-07-2005 and also circular Memo No. 18949/A/627/A2/W&M/2005-1 dated 03- 08-2005 and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set a side the proceedings dated 19-12- 2005 and 19-01-2006 and to pass such other order or orders as it may deem fitand proper inthe circumstances ofthe case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.L.V.S.NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MRSAKAMOHAN RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.4623 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the transfer of petitioner from Krishna district to Head Office at Hyderabad. There is no necessity of going into all the details. It is represented that during the pendency of writ petition, petitioner was proceeded with departmentally and he was dismissed from service. In view of the same, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication. Therefore the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 18.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.4623 of 2006 18.9.2008