1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.225/2008 (Tulsi Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 08, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.P.S.Chundawat, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that all the material witnesses have been examined by the trial court and they have not supported the prosecution case and turned hostile. I have carefully gone through the statements of PW.1 to PW.10. Almost all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that almost all the prosecution witnesses have turned hostile and did not support the prosecution case, without commenting on the merit of the case, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Tulsi Ram s/o Dungarji Suthar be released on bail in FIR No.159/2007, P.S. Aspur, Dist.. Dungarpur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-