1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 56. CA/1614/2008 In FAST/2218/2008 (The State Vs. Sojarbai) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. D.V.Tele, A.G.P., for the applicant. Mr. J.R.Patil, Adv., for the respondent/sole. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:15/1/2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. There is delay of 1024 days in causing to file the appeal. The State feels aggrieved by the enhancement in the Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, for the acquired 60 R.land of the claimant. The Special Land Acquisition Officer granted rate of Rs.250/- per R. while the Reference Court enhanced it to Rs. 500/-. It was as stated by the Counsel for the claimant based on 2 the sale instances. 3. The application seeking to condone the delay illustrate that though proposal was forwarded to the Law Judiciary Department 16.5.2005 but it was incomplete as certified copy was not enclosed with the said proposal. Consequently, correspondence was made. The order under challenge is dt.11.1.2005. Copy application was moved belatedly on 12.4.2005 and it was received on 29.4.2005. The manner in which the matter is attended by the concerned authorities projects slackness and, to cause sabotage to the claimants entitlement to receive the amount. No sufficient ground indicated in the application. It is dismissed. Consequently, First Appeal is dismissed. Necessary Court fee be refunded. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/1614-08ca