C.O.C.P. No. 482 of 2008 (O&M) 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 482 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : October 26, 2009 Joginder Singh ..... Petitioner Versus Jaswant Singh etc. .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate, for the respondents. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Petitioner has invoked the contempt jurisdiction in view of the order passed by this Court on January 17th, 2005, in Regular Second Appeal No. 1584 of 2000. For facilitation, the order dated January 17th, 2005, is as under :- “ Appellants are directed not to alienate the property in dispute in any manner.” Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that despite the restrain order, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (appellants in the R.S.A.) have alienated the land in dispute in favour of respondent Nos. 3 to 6 vide registered sale deed No. 1089 dated 28.12.2007, Annexure P/1. Shri Sudhir Mittal, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that notwithstanding the order dated January 17th, 2005, passed by this Court in R.S.A. No. 1584 of 2000, respondents No. 1 and 2 have sold the property in dispute. He, C.O.C.P. No. 482 of 2008 (O&M) 2 .. however, undertakes that within two months from today, another sale-deed shall be executed by respondent Nos. 3 to 6 in favour of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage. It is ordered accordingly. (Nawab Singh) Judge October 26, 2009. som