THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.5831, 5937, 5938, 5939, 5940, 5941, 5942, 5943 and 5944 OF 2006 COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. On 01.07.2010 and even today, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the respondents. Since common question is involved in all these revisions, they are taken up together for disposal. The petitioner filed a comprehensive suit seeking specific performance of an agreement, which is sought to be from the orders of the Government in G.O.Ms.1272 Revenue (Wakf) dated 08.11.1985. In the said proceedings, according to the petitioner, the value was already shown at Rs.1,30,000/- per acre and however, having regard to the chequered events, whereby the said G.O. was sought to be cancelled and that the GO has come back into force, the present suit has been filed. Later, on the allegation of the defendants of objection about the violation, the value was shown at Rs.3,30,000/-. In spite of the said value at Rs.3,30,000/- per acre, the present applications have been filed by the respondents herein once again trying to invoke Section 11 of the A.P. Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and Section 83 (5) of the Wakf Act, 1995. The Court below, by considering the respective submissions, straight away allowed the said applications holding that the petitioners have to pay the Court Fee by showing the monetary value of the land at Rs.1,09,000/- per acre. Hence, these revisions. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that admittedly, in the earlier proceedings, which have been issued in the aforesaid GO, the rate was mentioned at Rs.1,30,000/- per acre, whereas subsequent to filing of the suit at that value and on objection raised by the respondents, this value enhanced to Rs.3,30,000/- per acre along with the Court Fee. Be that as it may, the said value has been restricted in the proceedings, which is sought to be enforced in the suit. There is no doubt to take the said valuation, prima facie, for the purpose of suit valuation and even otherwise, since the petitioners have paid the Court Fee on the substantial value, it does not reiterate the issue and try to fix any such rate. Even otherwise, in the present applications, there is no material to show that the value could be something less or something more as sought to be fixed afresh by the Court below. In the circumstances, I do not find any justification in the revisions. All the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed and the orders impugned are set aside. The Court below shall dispose of the suit, as expeditiously as possible, not later than six {6} months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 8th July 2010 RRB