IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.18821 of 2001 Date: 11th August, 2010 Between: M.Vijayalakshmi .. Petitioner And The Managing Director, A.P. Women’s Coop. Finance Corporation Ltd., Ameerpet, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in rejecting the proposals of first respondent for regularization of services of the petitioner communicated vide proceedings No.2686/WCFC/A2/2000 dated 19.6.2001 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner from the date of her initial appointment with all consequential benefits including seniority and other monetary benefits. According to the petitioner, she was appointed as ‘Aaya’ vide proceedings dated 20.8.1987 and working with third respondent. Thus, she had put in more than 24 years of service as of today. In fact, earlier she filed W.P.No.6231 of 1998 along with other similarly situated persons. The said writ petition was disposed of by common order dated 20.7.2000 directing the respondents to consider the cases of petitioners for regularization of their services in accordance with provisions of G.O.Ms.No.212 Finance and Planning Department dated 22.4.1994. It appears, in pursuance of the said order, proposals were sent recommending the name of petitioner for regularization, however the first respondent vide proceedings dated 19.6.2001 rejected the claims stating that there are no sanctioned posts in the Corporation and as such, petitioner is not entitled for regularization of her services in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.4.1994. There is no necessity of going into all the details. In view of the fact that though there are no sanctioned vacancies available for considering regularization as per G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.4.1994, the services of petitioner are being continued and she was put on minimum timescale with effect from 18.2.2009 as per G.O.Ms.No.11 Women Development, Child Welfare and Disabled Welfare (WP) Department dated 18.2.2009 vide proceedings No.1801/WCFC/A1/08 dated 20.2.2009. Under those circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till a regular vacancy is available and as when regular vacancy arose; petitioner shall be absorbed in such vacancy with all consequential benefits, as per law. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 11.8.2010 DA