if Waj/ § sin§§e awash IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I—I'ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETIT10N(S)N0. &\\% OF 2010 Ku. Urmila Acharya D/o Late Shri Mahesh Acharya, aged about 56 years, Caste Bramhin, Resident of Panchrasta Chowk, Bramhinpara, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofCattisgar‘h, through : T Secretary, Schooi Education D.K.S. hh he Deprtment, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). T Director, Public Instructions, ipur (C.G.). The Collector, Jagdalpur, District- Btar (C.G.). T District Education Officer, Jalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). r Shikshan Samiti, Jagdalpur, Dtict Bastar (C.G.), through the v Chai rman. h Executive Managing mittee, Rashtriya Higher ndary School, Jagdalpur, sict Bastar (C.G.), through the Prd Te Com Seco Ditr .3“ esient. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF PETITIONER a he Ra as he agd Basta isr INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BELASPUR WRIT PETITION (8‘) No. 21 13 0f 2010 PE‘TITIONER : Ku. Urmiia Acharya VERSUS RE8PONDENTS : State of Chhamsgam & Others. Wri‘t Petition Under Amcie Under Article 226 Of The Coneii‘tutien Of india $3: Horrme Simi Satish K. Aanihotri. J. < Present: Shri Ashok Kumar Shukia, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State! respondents. GRN. (3RBE‘R {Paeeed on 04“ day at May, 2m G) Heard. itW ‘ e 4;. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner seeke to quash the order dated 23/09/2009 (Annexure P4); whereby the petitioner was cemputsoréiy retired from service and order dated 5/10/2603 by which the Principai‘ Nationat Higher Secondary School, hae rejected the representation submitted by the oetitioner. 2. Learned counsei submits that an appeal against the order dated 23f10f200Q is pending consideration before the Director, Schooi Education Department, Government of Chhattrsgarh, Raipur. During pendency of the statutory appeai before the Director, Public instructions the present petition has been filed for the same retief seeking quashing otthe orders dated 23/O§/2(309 and 5MOI2009. 3. The petitioner cannot be permitted to seek redressat by two alternative forums, if the appeal is pending consideration, this petition is not maintainable. Thus, the petition is dismissed on the ground that two paraliei proceedings for the same reiief cannot be entertained. 4. However, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case‘ the Director, School Education Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, is expected to consider and decide the pending appeal of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, as it is informed, at the bar. that the appeai is pending consideration for the last six months. Sdl- SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge Ashok g