IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2069 of 2011. Decided on: 11th April, 2011. Anu Devi ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R. S. Gautam, Advocate. For respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner, who is a PTA teacher, is aggrieved since she has been replaced by the 4th respondent, who is a regular teacher. According to the petitioner, there are vacancies available where the 4th respondent can be conveniently accommodated. In case, the petitioner is in a position to point out such a vacancy, where the 4th respondent is willingly to be accommodated and on the willingness thus being produced before the Director, an appropriate action in that regard shall be taken and in the result in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible and entitled, she shall be continued to be as a PTA teacher till she is replaced by a regular recruitee. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 11th April, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (c/rana) Judge.