^-—si HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WntPetiiaon(S)No. 7353 of2007 •^' EE'IITTOMRS : 1. Nawal Das Manikpiiri, S/o Mehttar Das Manikpuri, Aged 30 years, occupation Service, Posted as Accountant under the v -National Rural Employnient Guarantee Scheme at Jaiipad Panchayat Bakampur, Tahsil Pal Ramam.yganj, District Sarguja, R/o Baijalpiir, Tahsil Jaiijgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. 2. Viiiay Naik S/o B.L. Naik, aged 29 years, oceupation Sea-vice, Posted as Accountant under the National Rural EmployiaeHt Guarantee Schane at Janpad Panchayat Shankargarh, Tahsil Shaakargarh, District Sarguja, R/o Suprem E. 483, C.S.E.B. Coloiiy, Korba (East), District Kcwba, Chhattisgarh. 3. Geeta Chowdhary, W/o Nand Bacchan Yadav, Aged 29 years, occupation Service, Posted as Accoiurtant under tfae Natioiia! Riiral Employiiient Guarantee Scheme at Janpad Panchayat Lakhanpur, Tahsil Lakhanpur, District Sargyja, R/o Janpad Panchayat Laklianpiir TahsiS Lakliaiipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 4. Anju Bhagat, W/o Subhas Bhagat, Aged 25 years, Occupation Service, Posted as Accountant under tfae National Rural EmployBient Guarantee Scheme at Jaiipad Paachayat Rajpur, Tahsil Rajpur, District Surguja, R7o Rajpur, Tahsil Rajpyr, District Surguja, Clihattisgarh. VERSUS 1. StateOfChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Deparfment of Panehayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawaii, Raipiir, Qiliattisgarh. 2. Chhattisgarh State Employment Implementation Guarantee Council, Throughits President, ChiefMhisiter's Secretariat, DKS Bhawaii, Raipui- Chhattisgarh. 3. Union of India,TiTroughtfae Secretary, Mimstiy of Rural Development New DeBu. 4. District ProgramiTie Coordinator (CoUector) under the National Rurai Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 Surguja, District Surgiija, Chhattisgarh. 5. Zila Panchayat, Surgiija, Throu^i its Chief Executive QfKcer, Surgiija, Distriet Surguja, CMiattisgarh. 6. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat (DRDA), Surguja, Chhattisgarh. (WMT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. Asniiiotn, J.) Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate forthe petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent No. 1, 2 & 4. Shri S.K. Beriwal, Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 3. Sliri Sumesh Bajaj, Advocate for the respondent No. 5 & 6. RESPONDENTS B-. SK^a^^sS.^SA^SSBS^S^-^Si.^Sa^.^^®^ ORALORDER (Passed on fhis 25th ofMarch, 2008) !. Leamed couiisel appearing for the respoadenf No. 5 and 6 have filed an affidavit dated 17.03.2008 stating that no grievance of the petitioners remaiiis for adjudication as al! the petitioners have been coiisidered for re-appoiiitment. 2. Petitioner No. 1 and 2 have been selected and placed in waitmg list as there is no ^; vacancy in the category. They have been considered as per flie reservation roster applicable to tiie Rozgar Sahayak Sendceg. Petitioner No. 3 and 4 have ah-eady been selected and they have been re-appomted as Gram Rozgar Sahayaks on contract basis. 3. In view ofthe clear aad categorical stafement made in the affidavit, according to learaed eoimse! appearing for the respondent No. 5 and 6, nothing survives in tliis matter. 4. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, leamed couiise! appeariiig forthe petitioners subniits that the petitioners have not verified the facts but siiice the above statemeiit has been made on swom affidavit, there is no reason to doubt. Tlius, the petition has becdme uilhictiious. [5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infhictuous. No order asto costs. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge