IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-21620 of 2009 Date of decision:03.11.2009. Gurdeep Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. H.S.Dhindsa, Advocate, for Mr. R.S.Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. G.S.Jagpal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 & 3. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent Nos.2 & 3 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioners and respondent Nos.2 & 3 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.119 dated 08.07.2009, under Sections 326, 324, 148, 149 IPC, P.S. Phillaur, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 03, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE