IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17541 of 2008 Between: M/s. Viraj Constructions, Hyderabad, V. Rajgopal Reddy, S/o. Sundara Rami Reddy, R/o. Plot No. 1288, Road No. 65, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P. Rep by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Spl. Grade Dy. Collector & Revenue, Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Mohd. Jahangir Khan, S/o. Late Mohd. Nazeer Khan, R/o. C/o. 406, Staling Magestic Apartments, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad – 25. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings in Case No. B/1668/2008 dated 17-7-2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.V.PREETI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 17541 of 2008 Order: As against the impugned order dated 17.07.2008, passed by the 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District, incorporating the name of the 3rd respondent in the revenue records in respect of the land in question, revision lies to the Joint Collector concerned, but the petitioner without availing the said remedy has approached this Court directly. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 and 2, and having regard to the fact that the petitioner has alternative remedy of revision against the impugned order, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedy of revision available to him against the impugned order dated 17.07.2008, passed by the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, before the Joint Collector concerned. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 12.08.2008 Nsr