FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1948 OF 2011 "Vijay Vedu Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." with WRIT PETITION NO. 3606 OF 2011 “Anil Gangadhar Deshmukh Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.D. Joshi, Advocate for petitioner in WP No.1948/2011 Mr. V.B. Garud, Advocate for petitioner in WP No. 3606/2011. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. R.S. Pawar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- MOHIT S. SHAH,CJ & B.R. GAVAI,J DATE :- 30TH AUGUST, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Both the petitioners in these two petitions are praying for a Writ of Mandamus for their appointment on the post of Extension Officer (Education), pursuant to the process of selection held as per the advertisement dated 1st April, 2010 and 24th April, 2010. 2] Vide advertisement dated 1st April, 2010, certain posts have been advertised, including the post of Extension Officer (Education). By a subsequent corrigendum, one post of Extension Officer (Education) has been reserved for part-time employees. 3] The petitioners, claiming that both of them were entitled to be appointed against the said reserved post, have approached this court. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1948 OF 2011 "Vijay Vedu Pawar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." with WRIT PETITION NO. 3606 OF 2011 “Anil Gangadhar Deshmukh Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 4] During the pendency of the writ petition, the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad, Dhule, has referred the matter to the State of Maharashtra. Vide communication dated 11th January, 2011, the State of Maharashtra, has informed the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad, that persons who are in permanent employment are not entitled to be appointed against the posts reserved for part-time employees and only such employees, who are in part-time employment are eligible to be appointed against the said reserved posts. 5] Both these petitions are disposed of with directions to the Zilla Parishad, Dhule, to consider the rival claim of the petitioners in the light of the communication dated 11th January, 2011, issued by the Desk Officer of the Rural Development and Water Conservation Department, Govt. of Maharashtra, to the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Parishad, Dhule. This shall be done within one month from today. These directions are issued after hearing the learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] [MOHIT S. SHAH] CHIEF JUSTICE. grt/-