mmf‘ u/ (L7 z: mar ‘ ,iL ,‘L .Li,‘ \ M H t L; € um gé‘l[vs ”3 3EF®RE EGN'ELE Moi). STATE ABMENISTRATEVE €RIBUNAL2 BHGPAL (M. N®2002 .. .Appiisam Smt. Asha Saxena, W/o Late Shri Dinesh Chandra Saxena, Aged about 48 years, Resident at, “3;?A-56, Shahpura) Bhopal. V/S' 1. State of MP. Thmugh, .. .Respandents Secretary, Water Resources Department, ‘ Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 2. Engineer-in Chief, M.P. Water Resources Department, Amarkantalr Bhawan, Press Complex, Bhopal. 3. Chief Engineer, , Narmada Tapti Kachar, lndor‘e.‘ 4, Joint Director, Treasury and Accounts, Indore.“ 5 . Joint Director, xTreasury and Accounts, Bhopal. APPLICATION UNDER SECTEQN 19 @F ADMENISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL A€T 1985 RV ;\ WW,WE,W ~ M£$;J.MW/0f W m Wm WMW (W) anéatmtm awgmmamm' 4'? mmafaaméa WWI¥WW v ‘ aamanéa . : 5B : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Moh an Shrivastava, J. 25-01 -2010 When the matter was ca!ed for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was pa ed over. Even in the second round, none appears for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Pan i Lawyer for the State/respondents. Return med by the reepon nts as aiso the statement made before the Tribunal on 10-01-2003 shows that all the benefits claimed by the petitioner have been granted. In this View of the matter, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, However, iiberty is reserved to the petitioner to revive the petition, if the cause of action st It survives for consideration. A copy of the order be sent to the petitioner fort with. x ,Mx ’ v imanindra '