HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BIIASPUR lli w SB : HOK'BLB SHRI JUSTICaB SRramKERDIWAKER W.P. N0. (2271 4893/2008 Gopal Siugli, S/ o. Bisliun Singh, aged about 49 years, R/o. Vaiage Pratapgarh:, Taiisit Sitapur, Distt. Saiyija (GG) RESPONDENTS Versus 1. 2. 3. Sarwaa Sai, S/o. MangslSai, Kfo. 1 WSst^ ^- Pial^ggarto; TaKsil'SitapUi, ^Iiystiict Suiguja(CG) State of Chliafetisgarii, thrQUgIt CoUeetoi^Sitapur, Disft. Sai^uja (CG) 1 Sub . Diyisional Qfficer (ReyeEiue), Sitapiir, Disfriet SHrguja.{CG).i; • : . : WRTT PEyHTION imiM^A.RTtCI^ a270]rTH¥; COHSTttUTIOWOF INBIA Appearaace: • . • ^ .;' ., • Shri Rahul Bithahaiy, ttouiisel fortiie getitioxier, Shri Panka; Shiiyastava, Panellawyerfbr the State. CilRALORDEaa (09.04.26091 Leanied counsel for fhe Stete does not want to ffle rejoiader a& according to^Iiiin, Itere is altenl^^ available to llie petitiQner aad the saM poiat being ft ISBT poiat, hemay not require to file destailcd retum. SSB (isa Ha • •8 ]BS llall 811 ai isi• y c The challeiiige ia the present writ petition is fhe order dated 30.07.2008 (Annexure P/l) by which fhe Sub Divteional OfGcer (Revenue) has caacelled his own order dated 11.11.2004 regafdiag grant of birfh. certificafc ia favourofdaUghterofthepetitioiier. The conteD.tion ofleanied counsel for the petitioaer is that fhe Sub Divisional OflBeer has np aufhority ulider the law to eith.er issue fhe birfh Gertificate or to cancel titie sarne. Oa fhe other haad, contention ofileamed coynsel for the State is that the order passed by the Sub Divisional Of&cer is appeUable uader Section 44 of titie C.G. Laad Revenue Code, 1959 Uefere fhe <3onecfor, T have heard eQunsfel forfKe parties. In view offhe fact thatalteruative reinedy 1s av^ilable to fhe petitioner, fhis petition is disposed ofwith a direction tq ftie; petitioner lliat ^j.e aiay file appiCipnate appeal ^be&rc fhe Goflector i£oecasicin anses. lf^^ appeal js filed, fhs same will be tfecideB stnGtIy !idiSioCbidiaace witto law. Kt this stage, counsel for tlie^petitk>nfir subinits that the lualtation prescnbed for filuig fhe appeal has admittedly expircdl. The conceraed authority is directed to cdusider the poiaf of limitation liberalty. , Wifh the above observation, fhe petition is fitiaify dlsposed o£ Suguna Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge