1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 633/2007 With CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10770/2007 In SA/633/2007 (Jamuna Transport Corporation, Branch Office, Pune vs. The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Bombay, Branch office, Ahmednagar and another) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.N.Boiwar, Adv., h/f Mr. P.M.Yelnoorkar, Adv., for the appellant. Mr.Ajit Kadethankar, Adv., for Respondent no.1. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:23-4-2010 P.C.:- 1. The direction of this Court, to remit the decretal amount, is not adhered to in its letter and spirit. It was specifically pointed out on 17.12.2008, unless the amount is deposited, the Second Appeal will not be taken up for hearing. It was further pointed out, in case the amount is not deposited within two months, the respondents are at liberty to 2 get the matter circulated for hearing. The directions are not complied with. 2. The order under challenge does not require any interference as there is challenge to money decree and, it has been confirmed even by the first appellate Court in RCA No.365/2000. Second Appeal lacks merit, dismissed with Civil Application. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/633-07sa