IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR 'sarsiite Writ Petition (T) Nol 4^8 /2008 PETITIONER \'i.?°:^: ^•^ss^ ^^y S. S. Enterprises, A partnership Firm, through partner, ^>\^:^<^S^<L^ Surendra Jayaswal, Aged about 45 years, ^"" RESPONDENTS f^^^ \no^ ^^ S/o Late Shri G. P. Jaiswal, R/o High Court Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus- : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce (Trading 85 Development) Co-operative Federation Ltd. Through its Managing Director, A-25, VIP Estate, near VIP Club, Khamardih, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^3y?SS^^ ^3- Commissioner, fe^'10' Commercial Tax,Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, ^ \ ^ ^^ A<^^c^ civil Lines' Raipur (C.G.). j^ 4. Union of India, Through Secretary, Department of Commercial Tax, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. iS Kl II! •B?p SB' ^n^r ^SRT ^jch WT 3TI^?T sr»^I<t» Go^ NWMl SO^I^ 's^f ^ww^, «>Ti1-Mli<o, T®i<>iw^< . ti/Pfr^ /^c^l <s^ ^^...^...^..-,.&y...^..........^ ^p^ ^STT^^ (yii^^T) ^'wi^R «fta^i^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihot 1-10-2010 Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Shr| Sharma, Shri B.D. Guru, Shri Parj Tiwari, Shri Ajay Mishra, Shri Ha| Patel, Shri Ratan Pusty, Shri Dalpati, Shri P.K. Badhuri & Shri for the respective petitioners. ShriA.S. Kachhwaha, State/respondents. Common order has been No.2060 of 2002 (M/s Shyam Biri| Chhattisgarh & Others) including thji Signed and dated. On the request of learned) petitioners, the effect and operatji M/s Shyam Biri Works Ltd. matters shall not be given effect tc| from today. Certified copy as per judgment & order. cr»i^I<ii<ilti *ii^<yiT ^F Fs^ <r»i^i< ^3TfiPT3n^T u- Neelabh Dubey, Ms. Smiti Ikaj Shrivastava, Shri V.R. 1-sh Wardhan, Shri Sanjay /ilmrito Das, Shri Akhilesh 4nup Majumdar, Advocates Deputy Advocate General for the pfassed & delivered in W.P. IWorks Ltd. v. The State of |is petition. counsel appearing for the |on of the order passed in and other connected for a period of four weeks (su^ra) rules along with main Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^i^4 ^-^^TiTOT, <f:^':<PTR-'FS./i47—2/2010-1,00,000. 3