IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1303 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1055 OF 2009(D). (SATISH PRALHADRAO MOON...VS... UNION OF INDIA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri S.K.Verma & M.M.Sudame, Advocates for Applicant. Shri S.K.Mishra, A.S.G. for Respondents. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Accepting the reasons assigned explaining the absence of the learned Advocate on the date when the petition was listed for hearing, as good and sufficient, the application is allowed. 3. Writ Petition No.1055 of 2009 is restored to file. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1055 OF 2009(D). (SATISH PRALHADRAO MOON...VS... UNION OF INDIA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri S.K.Verma & M.M.Sudame, Advocates for Applicant. Shri S.K.Mishra, A.S.G. for Respondents. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2009. 1. The petitioner is before this Court challenging various orders. 2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 865 of 2007 challenging the same orders and the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, so also the application for restoration thereof. 2. In these premises, we dismiss the present writ petition on account of delay and latches and in view of dismissal of the earlier writ petition. JUDGE JUDGE RR.