IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2007 / 15TH ASHADHA 1929 WA.No. 1635 of 2007() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26285/2006 Dated 13/06/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER: ---------------------------------- K.A.JOY, (H.S.S.T), IN POLITICAL SCIENCE G.H.S.S., PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NOW WORKING IN G.H.S.S.N NAMAKUZHY, ERNAKULAM DT.] BY ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS & ADDITIONAL 7TH RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. P.S.MOHANAN, THE PRESIDENT, PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION, G.H.S.S., PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SECRETARY, PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION, G.H.S.S, PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SABU GEORGE, H.S.S.T COMMERCE, G.H.S.S. PIRAVOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. SCARIA MATHEW, P.T.A PRESIDENT DURING THE YEAR 2005-2006 GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PIRAVOM, RESIDING AT KUTHIRAVELIL, MARANGOLI P.O., VIA NEEZHOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.B.KAIMAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. =============================== W.A.. NO. 1635 OF 2007 ====================== Dated this the 6th day of July, 2007 J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. Learned Single Judge has already permitted the appellant to give a comprehensive representation before the 2nd respondent. Learned Single Judge also directed the 2nd respondent to afford adequate opportunity of hearing to the appellant. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the apprehension of the appellant is that the observations and the finding recorded by the learned Judge would go against him while the representation is being considered. It is made clear that the 2nd respondent has to consider the representation untramelled by the observations and the finding if any, recorded in the judgment. Till a decision is taken by the 2nd respondent as directed by the learned Single WA 1635/2007 : 2 : Judge, the post of HSST, Political Science in the Government Higher Secondary School, Piravom be not filled up. Writ appeal is disposed of as above. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp