IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2243 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2243 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2243 OF 2006 M/s. Z.F.Steering Gears (India).... Petitioner versus Sharad Damodar Gavhane & ors...... Respondent. Mr. K.S.Bapat h/f Avinash Fatangare for the petitioner Mr. N.G.Helekar for respondents. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 20TH JUNE, 2007 DATED; 20TH JUNE, 2007 DATED; 20TH JUNE, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; Not on board. Mentioned. 1. The employer has filed the present writ petition calling in question the legality and validity of the judgment and order passed by the Labour court which is confirmed by the Idustrial court, granting reinstatement with 40% backwages to the respondent. Pending the petition, the parties have resolved the dispute by entering into a compromise. The petitioner under the terms of compromise has aggreed to pay a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs to the respondent towards full and final settlement of his claim. The respondent employee is present in the court and he admits the consent terms to be true and correct. The consent terms is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The learned advocates for the respective parties make a joint prayer for disposal of the petition in consent terms. Hence the petition is disposed of in consent terms. ...