IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9524 of 2009 VIJYA NAND PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 13.8.2009 KHAN The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28.8.2006 passed by the Additional Collector, Bhojpur in T.A. Nos.28-30 of 2003-04 whereby according to him the court has set forth to decide the question regarding title. It has been stated in paragraph 8 of the writ petition that one Sharda Nand Pandey filed Title Suit No.327 of 2005 in the court of the Sub Judge I, Ara for partition and also for a declaration that the three sale deeds dated 10.10.2003 executed by the petitioner in favour of respondent no.15 is illegal along with other reliefs. It would be open for the parties to pursue the aforesaid Title Suit before the court concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ram Sakal Singh had moved the Board of Revenue in revision and subsequently withdrew his application. It appears that the petitioner has not exhausted all the alternative statutory remedies. Thus this application is premature on this score alone and it is accordingly dismissed. (S.P.Singh,J)