(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 6936 OF 2009 Navnath Patilba Thorat. .. Petitioner. versus 1. Appasaheb Patilba Thorat, 2. Ashok Patilba Thorat, 3. Ramesh Patilba Thorat, 4. Dhananjay Patilba Thorat, 5. Venuba Patilba Thorat, 6. Sau. Sangita Sunil Chaudhari, 7. Shakuntala Jagannath Thorat, 8. Ganesh Jayram Thorat, 9. Vijaya Jayram Thorat, 10. Sunanda Nanasaheb Bhambare, 11. Yogita Ganesh Phopase. .. Respondents. .......................... Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Shinde, Advocate, for respondent no.1, caveator. .......................... (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 2ND DECEMBER 2009. COURT'S ORDER : 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner (original defendant no.1) has challenged the order dated 11th June 2009, passed by the learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sangamner, below Exhibit 5 in Regular Civil Suit No. 479/2008, thereby allowing the application filed by the respondent no.1 (original plaintiff) for temporary injunction. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 27th August 2009, passed by the learned District Judge-1, Sangamner, in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 28/2009, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present petitioner, challenging the said order of the trial court. 2. In view of concurrent findings of fact and further not noticing any perversity therein, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. 4. However, taking into consideration the nature of dispute, the learned Judge of the trial court is directed to expedite hearing of the suit (3) and decide the same, on its own merits, as far as possible by 30th April 2010. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp6936