:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2210 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2210 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2210 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.981 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.981 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.981 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Mahindra British Telecom Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant. Mr.Atul K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 31ST MARCH, 2008 : 31ST MARCH, 2008 : 31ST MARCH, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no Affidavit-in-reply controverting the same. However, Mr.Jasani strongly opposes the Notice of Motion. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the above Appeal on board for admission on 15th April, 2008, subject to numbering. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) :2: