IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13921 of 2011 Raju Yadav son of Brahmi Yadav R/O Simana Chataiya, P.S. Pirpainti, District Bhagalpur …Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …….Opposite Party. ----------- 3 22.07.2011 Heard. In a criminal prosecution, registered under section 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code, though, petitioner is named in the first information report as an accused and is alleged to have snatched some money, but it is submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 22.9.2010 and the offence in question is triable by a Magistrate. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and particularly in view of period of incarceration, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 211 of 2010 (G.R. No. 2655 of 2010) subject to the condition: That one of the bailors must be Govt. servant or close family member of the petitioner who 2 will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner. (b) If the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing o all concerned.. Rahman/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)