In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 19620 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Aug 08,2011 Harkirat alias Kheera --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent AND CRM-M- 19694 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on Aug 08,2011 Devinder Kumar alias Binder --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr.A.S.Rai, DAG,Punjab Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This order shall dispose of two petitions bearing CRM M- 19620 of 2011 (O&M) titled as Harkirat alias Kheera Vs. State of Punjab and CRM M-19694 of 2011 (O&M) titled as Devinder Kumar alias Binder Vs. State of Punjab, because in both these petitions, they have prayed for regular bail in FIR No.148 dated 08.11.2010 registered under Sections 323,324,325,326,149 and 148 IPC at Police Station Goraya, District Jalandhar. However, for convenience, CRM-M-19620 of 2011 (O&M) would be called the first petition and CRM-M-19694 of 2011 (O&M) would be called the second petition. In the first petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that allegation against the petitioner is of causing injuries on the left CRM-M- 19620 of 2011 (O&M) -2- elbow and middle of the head of Paramjit Singh complainant. Insofar as the second petition is concerned, three injuries are attributed to the petitioner and injury on the left leg was found to be grievous. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the other co- accused namely, Sandeep Singh alias Sunny who is alleged to have chopped of little finger and some portion of longest finger of the complainant Paramjit Singh and also caused datar blow on his right side of forehead has already been granted bail by this Court in CRM-M- 1262 of 2011 (O&M) decided on 02.5.2011. Thus, learned counsel prays for parity with that case and submits that in the first petition, the petitioner was arrested on 14.10.2010 and in the second petition on 16.2.2011. He further submits that neither any case is pending against the petitioners nor they are previous convicts. In reply, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioners have caused grievous injuries to the complainant. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this case, especially the order passed in CRM-M-1262 of 2011 (O&M) but without making any observations on the merit, the present petitions are allowed and the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. August 08,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge