CRM-M No. 21617 of 2011 **** Boota Singh alias Narender Singh v. State of Haryana and another Present: Mr. B.D.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate for the complainant-respondent No.2. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.886 dated 30.10.2010, under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 506 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Hissar, District Hissar. This is a matrimonial dispute. Parties are present. Even with the intervention of learned counsel no settlement could be arrived at. It is not disputed that there is no medical record of any violence. In this view of the matter I put it to learned counsel for the complainant as to why bail should not be granted. He stated that actually apart from this FIR there is another FIR against the petitioner under Section 494 IPC because he has got married with another lady during the subsistence of his first marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has countered this by saying that in that case also the petitioner has been granted ad interim anticipatory bail. It is not disputed that respondent No.2 is in possession of two houses belonging to the petitioner in Dabwali. At one stage it had been tired that the petitioner should give one house and some money as maintenance to respondent No.2 to bring an end to this dispute but today learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner is ready to transfer one of the house in favour of respondent No.2 but is not in a CRM-M No. 21617 of 2011 -2- position to give any money. Keeping in mind the entire factual matrix I do not deem it appropriate to deny the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE December 12, 2011 sunita