A^ ^y^-\ •^- , In the Righ Court of Ghat-tisgarh, BilaspuryChattis^arh/ 9 Br.Pratap Agrawal s/o.Late B,N,Agrawal» 55 yearsf Advocaie,Jagdalpur: 494001 • Applicant» vs» Aji-t Jogi Chief Minister Ghaitisgarhy Mantralaya^ Kaipur, 492001, Non-applicante piablic Interest Litigation for appropriate W3S Under Art 226 CGns'bitution of India^ 241t 2 ^t ^w I^H Annesure tAt» Vc p Annexure 9A9< The applicant respeeif^lly suteu.ts as under s~ 1» Thaty In Public Sector I^ndertaking tBharat Al'umusiium Co.tKorbayGha-ttisgarli? also called tBALGO»* a private partner ts'terlitet has been inoluded with Government of India< Annesure IAt» 2» Sha-fc^ ihe non-applicant Chief mtsiis-fcer Ajit Jogi has chargked that thi.s deal of partnership is infact a deal of transfer t>y sell of Balco to s'terlite* And i-t zs agains-b the interes-b of People o£ Chattisgarh. AnnexiaretAt< 5. Thai^ -the enclosed annexures are the clippings of newspapers Navbharat^ BeshbandIi-atDainik Sfaaskar published from Raipur, dated 5.5.2001 and 4.5.2001, wfaieh say as -ynder $- f ^€-" ^^ :^^ •^ i). 11). iii). iv). reads as- under s- Ajit Jogi charges tMs deal as illegal having entered iuto by co2?rupt means between Publio Servaats of ITxiion of India, State of Chattisgarh and PriTate Company tsterlite»» Ajit Jogi claima to know as io when, where^ how and io whoia the bribe has been paid and in which accou^i of S^viss bank it is deposited. The amount of bribe is alleged to be Rs.100.00 crores. Ajit Jogi says that he will reveal ihis corrupt deal to a parlisjaentry enquixy coii3iaittee only Tha-fc, section 59 <af Gode of Criininal Procedure ^.^, ||24lL N.2•I {^c(|(l ^^ m1 Anne^uz tc p- Annexu: -^ added as under: ,<^ ^- ^ ^^ si-iti... '"<; ">^4:', , >^<. i" l^ irtl .. w. ..' [^ " 3 (v) : Non-applicant Ajit Jogi asks Steriite-owner Aml Agrawal to;disdose the ofkick'back and bribery receipents, IfAml Agrawal is a 'DESHBHAKTA'. CheifMimster AJit Jogi is defimtely a 'Deshbhakta^ and thus when he knows the recepients ofBribery.he musydisclose it." ^^^^SffS^ XI-HC-22 aRT^r^r l^ri^'sqn^T 5r»^i<^ ^Ra 2^^ ^:':;;K" v ;\- ^ 1 - --1 .CL.: ^^'^|l|'|^^^TT^d^?8^;^<q<rt^ ^flit?T 'qira? W.P. ,NO. 387/2001 ^l^<^j^Hi<^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^ 1)99 'I^^T' ^ ^TT^T ^<n^K-yi$a 1^< 16-7-2001 Shri-0<»P<, Agarwal^ A; Dr* N«K»sbttklii»py» ^pvocate for .petitionero h»G. for the Staly^o •The'present pet±tion| some.press- -clippings ahout pnade by the resppndent' rega;j Ste-rlite* • • Certa.:±n clipping^ Destzbandhu,5 Dainik. B haskar been filedo' . . /— The registry has not^ at all witt'.i the directions in W.P. No. 988/99 S.P.Anan|a ±s'filed on the'basis of ;;he statsme-nt 'alleged tq be' 'ding sell of Balco to from newspapers Na^Tbharat, D Ipublished from Baipur have 9-9-99 by- a Dlvision Bench at Indore^ Dro' Pratap Agr< an affldavit-not on' the per.- on newspaper reports.* . In p^ stated that nmy information of s- Ajit Jogi is based reports on Vldeo- ch. Sa far a^s ^ the matt' it is belng considere'd'by Shri A<.So Gafaarx^-a-l^ counsel ^ has submitted .the A-oex Court dated 12-3-2001 Cb(^lld^r1 WMf "^ f^t ^R5R ^7 3TP<W 3?n^?T . ^d that the P.IoLo .1s ndt .aid down ,in the or'der 'passed -v- State; of HoPe dated >f High Court-of MePo bench wal^.-petitiQner 'has filed ponal knowledge and is based ira 3 of the affidavit it 1s ^atement of non-appMcant 4>n newspaper reports and innels.o" ' ; '. • : ?r .regarding Ba-Ico. is concerned. tl^e Hon thle Apex Court o ^r..o. Central;novto ;Standing (|)rder passed loy -the Hontb1.^ conv of which:is ;ta'ken on , pfl^^Rst^ ^ XI-HC-22 3TT^T'^T f<^ 3^T fli^ich ^i^a EATHAK/- c'"; s- ^ :%^ 's^r ^siyid^ wzrai$Ty ^^^y ?I^FrN?s^87/2001 ^^[^''S^^^^^^^^9^^'^9^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 199 Ici^^r' ^ 3^^T'^TTW^ftcT -recorde In. the abovesaid c|( has made it clear thafc no Cl deal with' the'subject matt^ r-aised in the present peti^ Having thus considere4 petitioner as pub.lic, inter^ Court does not deserve to 9 dispo.sed ofo _^Y Sd/- Chief Justice <=hl^id^rl 'RTR^ff'? fi^t <M<$l< '^^ri^FTsn^T ^rder, Hon'bi'e tbe Apex Court ourt exce.pt this 'Coart 'shall r. of the issues/controversies .ionse - the. r^tition filed by. the •st litigation before this' e entertained and accordingly Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tit^^f<si^ ^ ^.^