r HSG" COURT 0s CHKATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR PeSition (227) No.3060 of 201 1 r-^t.ifciWl! issponcients IWrit PeSit Kartlk Ram, S/o Balsal Singh, agsd 60 yers, Caste Gond, R/o Bamhnikhurd, Po. Chaifma, TahiSii Paii, Distnct Korba (C.G.) 'ersi/s ugn tne i. State of Chhaifisgarh Throui CoHector, Korba, Distt.Korba (C.G.) The Tahsiidar, Pail, Distt.Korba (C.G.O 3. Neera BS! D/o Paibhswan, ageti 35 Dharam Kunwar Wd/o Paibhawan, aged 62 years, Krupal Ssngh S/o Rewaram, aged 48 years, Sjngh S/o Jatiram, aged 52 ysars, 7. Mahavir S/o Shankar Singh, agsd 42 years, Aii by Casta Kunwar, R/o Vljiage iamhnidih, Tahsi! Paii, Dlstt.Korba (Vy."t Pstition under Articie 227 of ihs Constitution of Sndla) Mr.C.K.Kesharwani.counssiforthepetitionsr. •* ws Sangeeta iviishra, Panei Lawysr for respondents No.1 and 2/Stats. Nons pressnt for other respondents. (Sl Hon'bte Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ""vUESFv V\f\i.f (11-7-2011) Sy thls petition under Artscie 227 of ths Constitution of india the pstiiionsr has chaiienged the iegaisty and propriety of ihe order dated 18.3.2u11 passsd by ihe Cjvli Judgs Ciass-ii, Pail !n Civii Suit No.82A;2008, whersby the Court below has dismissed ths spplication fiisd fay the psfjtioner under Ssction 151 ofths Cods of CMi Procsdure. 2. I have heard Searned counsei for the parttes, perused the order impugnsd and othsr doeumsnis fiied on behaif of the pstiiioner. -^ Lsarned counsei for ths pstitioner submrts that originaiiy the tand was aitottea to ths petitioner on lease, thereafEer aiiotment ordsr has been canceiied iiiegaiiy. The petitioner has fiied suit for deciaration and injunction, but the revenua officers havs startsd corrsction proceeding !R revsnue recora'. Learnsd counsei further submsts that if the record of revenue wouid be corrected, then hs may be dispossessed from iaase property or ihsre may be in danger of possession. The pstitioner has fiied an applScation under Sectton 151 of the Cods of Clvii Procedurs for directins ths reversus officers for resiraining from correction of the rscord which has bsen dismissed by the Court bsiov.'. 4. As per orcier impugned, the present petli'ioner has fiied suit for possesslor, and deciaration. The authorities may correct fhe record on the basls of prssent scenario but definiteiy there may be subject to decisson of this case. Oniy correction of the rsvenus racord wili not disposssss ihe petitionsr frorR the possession of any propsriy and he Is at Hberty to approach ths revsnus Court for mentioning his name In the revenue record reisting to possession of ihe ianci. 5. i do not find any 'iiiegaisty in ihe order impugnsd ••A'arranting snterfsreRce in axercise of supervlsory jurisdtetion. Consequentiy, the petition is liabie to be dtemissed and it is h.ersby dlsmissed at the motion stags itseif. No order as to costs. -—-—— T.P. Sharma < Judge ^