IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3997 of 1990 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? --------------------------------------------------------- D N BANKER Versus DEAN, GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, BARODA AND ANOTHER --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 3997 of 1990 NOTICE SERVED for the Petitioner MR. L.B. DABHI, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT Date of decision: 02/08/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Despite the service of notice for the engagement of a Lawyer, it appears that the petitioner has not taken any steps. He is not present; he has not even conveyed through anybody or has not sent the report. In all probabilities, therefore, presumption may be that his grievance might have been redressed or the matter must have been settled. It is in this context that when the matter is of 1990 and despite the service of notice, party does not remain present, the Court is left with no option but to raise its hands in helplessness and to dismiss for default. Hence, dismissed for default. Rule discharged. Ad interim relief granted earlier stands vacated accordingly. (J. N. BHATT, J.) /shamnath