IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1755 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 1755 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 1755 OF 2006 1. Pranav Hemant Kanakia & 3 ors. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. Nivas Kambli i/b Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the petitioners. Mr. Rajiv Mane, AGP for the respondent No.1. Mr. Neel Helekar for the respondent No.3. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 08TH JANUARY, 2007 P.C. : . At the outset, Mr. Nivas Kambli, Advocate prayed for adjournment on the ground that Mr. A.M. Saraogi, counsel for the petitioners was not available. The prayer for adjournment was opposed by the counsel for the respondent No.3. He submitted that Writ Petition has become infructuous and, therefore, prayer for adjournment is not reasonable. 2. The counsel for the respondent No.3 submitted that the petitioner No.3 has already cleared the : 2 : S.Y.B.Com. in the result declared in the month of September, 2006. As regards petitioner No.4, we are informed that he has left the college. In respect of petitioners No.1 and 2, the counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that both of them shall now appear in F.Y.B.Com. examination to be conducted in the month of January, 2007. 2. There is no reason in not accepting the statement of the counsel for the respondent No.3. 3. We, accordingly, dismiss the Writ Petition. Sd/- [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] Sd/- [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]