1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.7631 OF 2007. PETITION NO.7631 OF 2007. PETITION NO.7631 OF 2007. Shri Rajabali Burhanuddin Shirawala & ors. : Petitioners versus The Municipal Corporation of the City of Thane & Anr. : Respondents. Mr.Vineet Naik a/w Mr.Darshan Mehta i/by M/s. D. Liladhar & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr.R.S.Apte for Respondent No.1 Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP, for Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. : S.B.MHASE & S.S.SHINDE, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : APRIL 08, 2008. : APRIL 08, 2008. : APRIL 08, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Apte, the learned counsel appearing for 2 Respondent No.1, makes a statement that Vikas Prastav i.e. VP 2007/89 is sanctioned and due charges have been conveyed to the Architect by letter bearing No.bmc/fdd 48 dated 2nd April 2008 and, thus grievance of the petitioners is redressed. The statement made by Mr.Apte is accepted. Mr.Vineet Naik, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, therefore, submits that in view of the statement made by Mr.Apte, this petition has to be disposed of. Hence, the petition is disposed of accordingly. [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, [S.S.SHINDE, J] [S.B.MHASE, J] J] [S.B.MHASE, J] J] [S.B.MHASE, J]