IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4268 of 2010. Decided on: July 24, 2010. Indira Nadhyan. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG, for respondents No. 1 & 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1, order of transfer. Though several grounds are taken to attack the order, in the nature of the order we propose to pass in the writ petition, we do not think it necessary to refer to the same. The petitioner has made representation Annexure-PB before the second respondent. It is pointed out in Annexure- PB that there is a vacant place at District TB Centre Shimla. The various other difficulties, as to why the petitioner wants to be retained around Shimla are also given in detail in Annexure-PB. 2. There will be direction to the second respondent to look into Annexure-PB, consider the submissions made therein and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice, within a period of ten days from the date of production of the copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. In the meanwhile, the 2 petitioner may not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open to her to avail leave till such time the orders are passed, as above. 3. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 24, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (karan/vs) Judge.