IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 309 of 2002() ------------------------- CRA.591/1999 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKOE .................... REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/1ST DELINQUENT -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SABEER, S/O. BASHEER, THEKKUMTHALA PARAMBIL, PALLIKANDY, NAGARAM AMSOM AND DESOM OF, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM SMT.KOCHUMOL KODUVATH SRI.V.M.ABHILASH RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHEMMANGADU POLICE, KOZHIKODE, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. MUHAMMED PUZHAKKARA THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.Q. BARKATH ALI, J. ----------------------------------------- Crl. R.P. No. 309 OF 2002 ----------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF JUNE, 2011 O R D E R The revision petitioner is the first accused in ST No.17/1998 on the file of Juvenile Court (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Kozhikode and the appellant in Crl. Appeal No.591/1999 on the file of Sessions Court, Kozhikode. 2. The allegation against the revision petitioner was that he along with second accused in the case committed theft of an autorikshaw and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 379 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. Both accused were juvenile. The Chief Judicial Magistrate called for the report of the District Probationary officer, Kozhikode and on the basis of the report second accused was released on probation. Revision petitioner was committed to the Special Home, Thiruvananthapuram for a period of 3 years under Section 21 (d) of Juvenile Justice Act. The said order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate is confirmed in appeal by the lower appellate court. 3. The revision petitioner was committed to the Special Home, Thiruvananthapuram by the order of the Chief Crl. R.P No.309/2002 -2- Judicial Magistrate dated November, 10, 1999. The judgment of the lower appellate Court is dated June 28, 2001. The Public Prosecutor has reported that the revision petitioner has already undergone the period of detention ordered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Therefore the revision petition has become infructuous and has to be dismissed. In the result, the Revision Petition is dismissed. Sd/- P.Q. BARKATH ALI JUDGE AMG True copy P.A to Judge