IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7886 of 2010 1. MD.SHAHNAWAJ KHAN, S/O LATE MD. NAYEEM KHAN, R/O VILLAGE- JABBARCHAK,P.S.- TATARPUR,P.S.- TATARPUR, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR). 3. THE LABOUR COMMISSIONER, LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR). 4. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR). 5. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI (JHARKHAND) 6. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, DUMKA, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND, DISTRICT-DUMKA (JHARKHAND). 7. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND, DUMKA (JHARKHAND) 8. THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, DUMKA, DISTRICT- DUMKA (JHARKHAND). ----------- 2 28.02.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that in normal course against the impugned order passed by the Labour Commissioner, Dumka the writ application will lie in the Jharkhand State. However, he submits that the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has been rejected on the ground that he had filed his application beyond time which is an error of record. In support of the same, he produces 2 some documents. If the petitioner has a proof in hand that he had applied for compassionate appointment in time he will be at liberty to move the Labour Commissioner, Dumka himself and produce the said proof praying for reconsideration of his case. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)