IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18520 of 2009 SHYAMBABOO SINGH Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 11.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been alleged as assailant of the deceased. Informant’s house has been found burnt. The only submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there are only three to corroborate the prosecution case where the informant, daughter and one of their neighbours, while there are constant witnesses to state that the house was set on fire and deceased was done to death by informant’s family member. While daughter of Radha Singh was coming from the school, she was taken into house of the informant and vermilion was put on her head by ladies family members. Really, Radha Singh tried to outrage of the informant’s daughter-in- law earlier and the revenge was to reply that incident. If really something happened that is admitted and put of vermillion was being opposed by the petitioner. In that continuation, there was a murder and incident of 436 I.P.C. If that was really to involve the petitioner’s party, no such report was made anywhere, rather in course of investigation witnesses appeared and deposed to favour the prosecution version which in no case can be taken to favour him (petitioner). Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)