IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-21325 of 2009 Decided On : 04.11.2009 Narayan Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Raghubir Singh, has stated at the bar that the petitioner has not joined investigation. As per allegations of the prosecution, the petitioner is a main conspirator. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not a beneficiary. It is not a ground to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. NOVEMBER 04, 2009 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE