IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1054 of 2006 BINDA DEVI & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 4.8.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the counsel for the private Respondent No. 7. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.12.2000 passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar Darbhanga in case No. 2 of 2000-2001 as contained in Annexure-2 to this application, whereunder two Katha Six Dhurs of land bearing plot Nos. 4278 and 4277 appertaining to Khata No. 758 of Village Baheri has been mutated in favour of private Respondent No.7, which order has also been affirmed by the Collector, Darbhanga under order dated 26.8.2005 passed in Mutation Revision No. 138 of 2000-2001 as contained in Annexure-1 to this application.. 3. Perusal of the aforesaid two orders indicate that mutation of the land in question has been allowed in favour of private Respondent No.7 on the basis of the registered sale deed dated 9.11.1984. It is agreed at the Bar by the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the private Respondent No.7 that two Katha six Dhurs of land which is the subject matter of sale deed dated 9.11.1984 as also the subject matter of the mutation proceeding impugned in the writ case does not include 14 Dhurs, 10 Dhurs of plot Nos. 4278 and 4277 appertaining to Khata No. 758, which the petitioner is claiming through registered sale deed dated 23.1.1959 and rent receipt, Annexure-3. - 2 - 4. In view of the statement made at the Bar by the counsel for the parties, this writ application is disposed of with observation that the Jamabandi created in favour of petitioners as also private Respondent No. 7 should continue as both the Jamabandi are for different lands. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)