1 Cri.Appln.No.1073/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1073/2011 (Shankar Nagoji Chinchole Vs. The State of Maharashtra) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Smt. SS Jadhav, Adv. for applicant; Mr.KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 23 rd March, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) The accused/applicant, claims to be 75- years, in custody, seeks release on bail. 3) The accused/applicant with his daughter and another son, ensured elimination of son-in-law; blood-stained sticks are recovered at the instance of son of the accused/applicant. The accused/applicant has actively participated in the conspiracy and concert to eliminate the son-in-law. A rickshaw driver as the witness even pointed role of the accused/applicant. 4) Even if the accused/applicant is not keeping well, care can be taken at the jail. Though counsel submits the accused/applicant to be 75-years, 2 Cri.Appln.No.1073/2011 however, in the application moved before the learned Sessions Judge, it was informed the applicant to be 65-years. At this stage, without having any skirmish on the issue of age, either to be 65 years or 75 years, merits and gravity of the matteer, at this stage, do not call for release of the accused/applicant. The application lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/