( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2008 Hingoli Shikshan Prasarak Mandal .. Petitioner Versus Sanjivkumar and anr. .. Respondents Shri P.S. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 25.09.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri P.S. Agrawal for the petitioner. The order passed by this Court on 15.04.2009 in Writ Petition No. 186 of 2008 is as follows:- "2. The petitioner to file a fresh proposal and in case proposal is filed, the State Government would deal with the proposal in accordance with the norms and communicate to the petitioner the outcome of the proposal as expeditiously as possible. Petition is disposed of." ( 2 ) 2. Admittedly, on 09.07.2009 the Director of Education (Primary), Government of Maharashtra, has informed about the receipt of proposal without recommendation of District Level Committee. It is informed that the proposal should have been sent through the District Level Committee and therefore the proposal was sent back. 3. In my opinion, it does not amount to contempt. The petitioner is at liberty to send fresh proposal through proper channel. 4. The contempt petition stands disposed of. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/SEP09/cp293.09