IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.597 of 2009 RENJI GEORGE JOSEPH S/O P.M. JOSEPH --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. VARSHA ASHOK JAWALEGKAR D/O ASHOK VISHWANATH JAWALGEKAR ---OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 02 24.11.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner, while assailing the order impugned, submits that there is no materials brought on record to show that husband/petitioner is profitably engaged in any organization. It is also contended that on account of the awkward and ugly seen created by wife in the office of the employer of the petitioner he has been put on notice for disengagement by non renewable of the contract. Based on the deposition of the application/wife in connection with a criminal case lodged by her it is submitted that she is profitably engaged and is able to maintain herself. On these submissions it is urged that the order granting ad interim maintenance in favour of the applicant/wife be interfered with. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2, on the other hand, submits that the order is passed on the basis of materials on record and does not require any interference particularly when the same is ad interim in nature . By the order impugned dated 20.02.2009 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance case no. 93(M) of 2007, learned Court below has allowed ad interim maintenance in the sum of Rs. 3000/- (Three thousand) per 2 month in favour of the applicant/wife. It further appears that the said order was passed after hearing both the sides. The order is ad interim in nature. The whole matter is before the learned Principal Judge. This Court has no manner of doubt that if all these issues are raised and supported by evidence, the trial Court shall consider them in accordance with law and finally disposed of the application. At this stage, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 points out that evidence is being led on behalf of the parties. Having regard to the aforesaid facts appearing from the record, this Court declines to interfere with the order. However it is made clear that learned trial Court shall not be prejudiced in any manner by the impugned order which is ad interim in nature while disposing of the case finally on merit. With this observation, the application is disposed of. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)