IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 7TH ASWINA 1930 W.A.No. 601 of 2008 ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20065/2007 DATED 1.2.2008 .................... APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: ----------------------------------------- 1. M.G.MANILAL, S/O.GOPALAN NAIR NIRAVATH HOUSE, PANAMATTAM KARA ELANGULAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. K.K.HARIKUTTAN, S/O. MANIYAMKUTTY KEECHERIKUNNEL HOUSE, ELANGULAM KARA ELANGULAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. T.N.RAVINDRAN, S/O. NARAYANAN THANNIKKAL THEKKETHIL HOUSE PANAMATTAM KARA, ELANGULAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.KISHNANUNNI(SR.) & SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. P.S.MOHANAN NAIR, S/O.SANKARAN NAIR CHILANKA HOUSE, PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. ELAMGULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.3576, KOORALI P.O., PIN 686 522 REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR. 3. A.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR, "SREESYLAM" PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. W.A.NO.601 OF 2008 - 2 - 4. K.J.VIJAYAMMA, "SREESYLAM" PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. 5. VIJAYAMOHAN, "SREESYLAM" PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. 6. SURESHKUMAR, "SREESYLAM" PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. 7. THE SECRETARY, ELAMGULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOORALI. 8. THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 9. THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOTTAYAM , REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. R2 BY ADV.SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS R8 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR FINAL HEARING ON 29/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------- W.A.No.601 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 29th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. This writ appeal was admitted on 12.3.2008. After admission, the Court had directed issuance of notice to the respondents. Right from 12.3.2008 till to this date, the appellants have not paid process fee to issue notice of this writ appeal on the respondents. In our opinion, it only shows that the appellants are not interested in this appeal. 2. Therefore, the writ appeal is rejected for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns