IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2011 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 15483 of 2009(E) ---------------------------------- CMP.1562/2009 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, MANJERI .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------- U. KHADEEJA, W/O. HAMZA, AGED 65 YEARS, UMMATHUR HOUSE, POOKKOTTUMPADAM, NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL CORPORATION LTD., KOTTAPPADI, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR.A.K, AKKATTIL HOUSE, AMARAMBALAM, POOOKKOTTUMPADAM, P.O. NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, NILAMBUR BRANCH, NILAMBUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. * ADDL. R4 TO R7 IMPLEADED 4. AYUBKHAN KIZHISSERI, S/O. HAMSA, DOOR NO.11/221 MGR NAGAR, GUDALLUR, NILGIRI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU - 643 212. 5. P. ABDUL NAZAR, S/O. CHEKKU, PULTH HOUSE, VATTAPPADAM POKKOTTUMPADAM, AMARAMBALAM VILLAGE, NILAMBUR TALUK. svs ............2/-... ...2... WPC. NO.15483/2009. 6. THE SUB REGISTRAR, THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. VILLAGE OFFICER, AMARAMBALAM VILLAGE, POOKKOTTUMPADAM, NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. * ADDL. R4 TO R7 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 21/08/2009 IN I.A. NO.10547/2009. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI, SC., H.D.F.C. R3 BY ADV. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR, SC KSHB, TVM R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I.A. No.18488 of 2011 & W.P.(C)No.15483 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T By this I.A., the counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ernakulam. Heard both sides. Permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If the petitioner can at this point of time validly maintain an application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) the petitioner may do so. The dismissal of the writ petition will not stand in the way of doing the same. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/