IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19915 of 2011 Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kumar Singh Son of Shivjee Singh. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 08.07.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner who, though been named at an early stage not been sent up for trial and, therefore, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C., been summoned to face trial. Simple allegation subsist against him to the extent of making firing upon informant Satroghan Singh, which did not strike. Contention on behalf of petitioner is that it happens to be absolutely absurd story because of the fact that before having presence of petitioner, informant had already sustained fire arm injury at the hands of Brajesh Singh, so alleged and if at all petitioner's presence was, either the informant should have been murdered or at least sustained the following fire arm injury because of the fact that informant was not at all in a position to escape therefor. 2 On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer but fairly concedes that petitioner does not happen to be author of injury. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kumar Singh is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned F.T.C. IVth, East Champaran at Motihari, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sessions Trial No. 455 of 2005 arising out of Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 125 of 2004 registered under Sections 307, 341, 120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J. )