IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 10460 of 2008 Decided on: 21.12.2010 Padam Singh Chauhan …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S.Guleria, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgments rendered by this Court in Rajinder Singh and others Vs. State of H.P., CWP No. 1352 of 2006 and Shri V.K. Behal and others versus State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 488/2001. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. Consequences shall ensue. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 21, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?