1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.885 OF 2009 Sau.Shila Yashwant Ogale .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.B.Gawade for the petitioner. Ms.P.H.Kantharia, APP for the State. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2009. P.C.: . The petitioner claims to be the wife of one Yashwant Motiram Ogale. She has filed Criminal Complaint No.497 of 2004 against Yashwant Motiram Ogale under sections 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w 34 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has told us that the said complaint is pending. The case of the petitioner as stated in the petition is that Yashwant Motiram Ogale married her with an intention to cheat her even though he was married to some other woman. 2. The petitioner filed another complaint in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nashik interalia contending that from 26.9.2001 to 9.4.2002 Yashwant Motiram Ogale is shown to have worked as an employee of Nashik Municipal Corporation, however for the same period his attendance is shown in Sadguru Education Society’s B.P.Ed.College, Jalgaon, as a student of B.E.Ed.course. It is the 2 case of the petitioner that Yashwant Motiram Ogale has forged and fabricated the record. By the impugned order the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nashik has dismissed the complaint under section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 on the ground interalia that the petitioner has no locus. We concur with the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. 3 Yashwant Motiram Ogale is an employee of the Nashik Municipal Corporation. Nashik Municipal Corporation has not made any such complaint. The petitioner is not the employee of that Corporation. The Chief Judicial Magistrate has rightly observed that she has no locus. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. We make it clear however that this order shall not come in the way of the petitioner in prosecuting her other pending criminal complaint against Yashwant Motiram Ogale. On the merits of that case we have made no observations. 4. Petition is disposed of. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)