IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1219 of 2010 1. JITENDRA SINGH S/O SRI HARENDRA SINGH R/O VILL.- AHILE, P.O.- KURMICHAK, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTT.- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION DISTT.- BHOJPUR 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER AGIAON, DISTT.- BUXAR 5. THE HEADMASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL AHILE, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTT.- BHOJPUR 6. MUKHIYA, GRAMPANCHAYAT POSAWA BLOCK- AGIAON, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTT.- BHOJPUR 7. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAMPANCHAYAT POSAWA BLOCK- AGIAON, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTT.- BHOJPUR ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Naresh Sharma. For the State : Mr.Ranjeet Pandey, A.C. to G.P.19 For respondent no.7 : Mr. Kamal Nayan Choubey. For respondent no.5 : Mr. Uday Kumar. For respondent no.6 : Mr. Manoj Kuamr Yadav. 7 23.8.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add District Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal, district- Bhojpur through its Chairman as a party respondent in this case. Petitioner claims to be a Panchayat Teacher appointed under Handicapped category and posted at Primary School, Ahile in the district of Bhojpur. As per petitioner he was appointed in the year 2006 and since then he has been working without being paid his salary. He states that almost thrice he was sent for training. The fact is that the petitioner’s appointment was strongly disputed by some of the respondents. They even 2 dispute the appointment letter. On the other hand, the teachers of the school including the headmaster maintained a stand that the petitioner was duly appointed and is working regularly since his appointment. The Headmaster even filed a counter affidavit to that extent. These basic facts are great controversy, which this Court in these summary proceeding at this stage is in apt to resolve . I, therefore, direct the petitioner to file an application before the District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Bhojpur at Ara ,who would examine the matter after due notice to the respondents including the Headmaster of the school in question and conducting such enquiry, as may be deemed fit in this regard, and consequently pass appropriate order for any relief to which the petitioner may be entitled to as a matter of his claimed service. The tribunal should decide the matter within a period of three months from today. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)