^-'j,--:1f> A*'"Qrf- . :-:^^&^^-^s: IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAM AI BILASPUR C.G. o5 o^ .SPPLICANTS Plaintiffs. CIVIL REVlSlON N0.....^'..'..of 200- 8 1. E.amchandra Son of Jhaduram aged •' 72 years< village Bhadora< 'Tahsil Masturi, Distt.Bilaspur C.G. /^y ^ NON APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS. ^•".^ ^/"^y ..2. Usha Bai wife of Sheocharan* village -*• / ^. . -, - . ^. , -^ ,„, J- -. f>''^;.\"' ..••' ••' Parngarh, Chan<3ipara» Tahsil Shetbri '^^^ Narayan, 3. Shiva Bgi wife of Devi prasad Alias Sore, village Bhadora, Tahsil Masturi Distt Bilaspur C.G. Versus s Ram Vilas S/o Jhaduram. ^ . _ .. . 2. Jogiram Son of Sukhiram. ^/ 3. Kgnti son of Deviprasad. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur. 5. Tahsildar Mgsturi, 1,2, & 3 resident, of village Bhadora, tahsil Magturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. ^•' Civil Revision under section 115, of the Civil Procetiure Code. XI-HC-22 7S{ •<j]^i<ni|, o-rfl^'is, Ri'aitfy t^".1 ^ *ii*<^raitii<»i "G^/CJ^-" P^ 200 311'^ERT f^-ri'ifian^T ^iTiWgfgtT sn^TgraTwgfN' 'shl'iltrt-ifl-) W^vti ff tSVI vS^KZK ^; sri^uT sn^sn )fprosec^ition 21-10-2005 None for fhe pa^-ties Once fhe case day, but for waut ofprosec^itioB passed over. Now, the case appears for the applicaats. The revision is| behalfofthe applicaats. ^yas called out dunng the course of fhe :^ition on behalf offhe applicaats, it was has been caUed out agaiu, but none dismissed for want of appearalice on Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge