w? (Q §§°/"§ IN m MADHYA PBitDESE S$IHE ADMINISMTQE‘ '13IBUNAL P U Misc. Application No. __. ...-OF 1994 £gP;;CAM Smt. Poornima Pate]. w/of chitrasen Patel Hindi Shorthand $ngdeshak'(non clerical cVlgsVs' - III, Eahila Audhyogik Parashikshan 3ansta - KOREA (Distt. B‘ilaspur) Versus HIGH CGURT OF CHHATT‘ISGARH : BiiASPUR WRIT ?ETIT!ON'(S) N5.§5Di2005 i’JETiTmNER Smt. Poornima Patel Versus RESPONDENT H. P. Gupta §ingje gaggh: Hmfble Shgj Sgtish K. iignihgmagag re§ent: - None far the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. CEAL OREER {Fasseci on ihis 17‘“ day of 3epiember, 2609) The matter is sailed for hearing fwice. 0n boih occasions, none appears nor any representaiion is maee en behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may noi be interested in the matter. (2) in View of ihe above, the writ peii‘iion is dismisseti for want oi prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy oi this order to the petitioner forthwith. N» >. sir/— i Satish K. Agnihotri i: Judge