-(1)- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.529 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.418 OF 2007 1. Nandkishor Kaluram Dudhane, 2. Rahul Manohar Bhosale. ..Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Mr.S.V.Kotwal, Adv. i/b. Mr.M.S. Mohite, Adv. for the Applicants. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2007. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2007. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants-original accused Nos.1 & 4 have been convicted under Section 302 read with 34 of IPC. The applicants are now seeking bail. 3. The evidence of PW-3 Suresh Lalwani, who is an eye witness clearly implicates the -(2)- applicants. He has stated that the applicants along with others were armed with weapons, like gupti, sickle, sword and sattur, and they assaulted the deceased Raju Pawar. The medical evidence shows 21 injuries on the body of Raju Pawar, which are all incised wounds. 4. In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to grant bail to the applicants, though they were on bail during the trial. Application is rejected. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]