{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5501 OF 2009 Narendra Chudaman Bendale & Anr. PETITIONERS VERSUS J.T.Mahajan Urban Cooperative Society Ltd., and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.J.R.Shaikh h/f Naseem R.Shaikh, Advocate for petitioners ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 24th August 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioners challenge the order passed by the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Jalgaon. It appears that the petitioners had availed remedy of appeal by filing an appeal before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Mumbai. The aforesaid order is not subject matter of challenge. The appeal filed by the petitioners came to be rejected. In any event, the petitioners have an alternate remedy of challenging the appellate order before the National Commission. In the light of availability of alternate {2} remedy to the petitioners, we are not inclined to interfere in this petition. Consequently, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy, if so advised. In the event a question of limitation arises, the authorities shall take into consideration the period of pendency of this petition from 31.07.2009 till today. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/wp5501-09