IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2011 / 20TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18707 of 2011(K) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. AMIT KUMAR, S/O.KRISHNA BAHADUR, AGED 24 YEARS, ETTIKITTEL HOUSE, PULINCUNNOO, ALLEPPEY, PIN:688 504. 2. AMIT KUMAR PRABHAKAR, S/O.LAKSHMI PRASADH YADAV, AGED 23 YEARS, ETTIKITTEL HOUSE, PULINCUNNOO, ALLEPPEY, PIN:688 504. BY ADV. SRI.M.PREMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-683 104. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-683 104. R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 18707/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 11/05/2011 SUBMITTED BY 1ST PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATD 11/05/2011 BY 1ST PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 25/05/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P4: COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 25/05/2011 BY 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.18707 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 7th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC ab JUDGE