IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-26793 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.11.2011. Puneet Yadav ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana, for the respondents – State. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) By filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Puneet Yadav seeks transfer of the investigation of the case bearing First Information Report No.126 dated May 27th, 2011, under Sections 302, 307, 323, 452, 506 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25, 27 of Arms Act, Police Station Sector-40, Gurgaon (Annexure P-1) to some independent agency or Central Bureau of Investigation. 2. Learned State counsel assisted by Mr. Surender Singh, Sub Inspector, has stated that three accused were named in the FIR viz., Durgesh, Bharti and Anoop Kumar. During investigation, Anoop Kumar has been found innocent. Charge-sheet/challan has been filed against Durgesh and Bharti. Bharti could not be arrested. Proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. are pending against her. All efforts are being made to arrest her. 3. In face of it, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that this petition be dismissed as infructuous because prosecution has already moved an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon Anoop Kumar as an additional accused to face trial alongwith Durgesh and Bharti. 4. It is ordered accordingly. 26.11.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) neetu JUDGE