THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.339 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Contempt Case is filed for deliberately disobeying the order dated 14.11.2008 passed in W.P.No.15759 of 2008, whereby and where under the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Karimnagar has been directed to consider the representation of the petitioner- Association dated 16.7.2008 and pass appropriate order after putting on notice the effected parties. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 20.3.2009. The 1st respondent entered appearance and filed counter affidavit. It is stated in the counter affidavit that pursuant to the direction given by this Court notice has been issued to 2nd respondent to appear on 5.3.2009 with all relevant documents to establish their claim. In pursuance to the notice the petitioner has submitted his written explanation on 4.3.2009 and 2nd respondent appeared on 5.3.2009 and submitted her explanation. It is stated in the counter affidavit that after considering the claims of both the parties, an order has been passed on 31.3.2009 vide proceedings Roc.No.G2/4387/2008 stating that as per the physical verification there is a basement upto 4 ft. height and unfinished compound wall towards North and Western sides of the site in question. There is also a trench around the compound wall. The said unauthorized construction of basement and compound wall is built by third parties i.e,, Budige Jaya Laxmi and three others. Injunction order in I.A.No.521 of 2006 in O.S.No.89 of 2006 dated 6.6.2006 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar is pending as on today. As such the Corporation cannot take any action against the unauthorized construction of third parties in view of the injunction order and awaiting for final orders in the suit. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that in view of the injunction order issued by the civil court no further proceedings could be initiated after issuance of the proceedings dated 31.3.2009. The factual aspect of the purchaser from 2nd respondent filing suit and obtaining injunction order is not disputed by the petitioner herein. Such is the situation, it is for the petitioner to get himself impleaded as party/defendant in the suit and seek vacation of the order. Once the order is vacated, 1st respondent has to take further steps. As on this day, since 1st respondent already initiated proceedings it amounts to substantial compliance of the order dated 14.11.2008 passed in W.P.No.15759 of 2008. In view of the above, this Contempt Case is closed. 25th September, 2009. (B.Seshasayana Reddy,J) tnb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.C.NO.339 OF 2009 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2009.