IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.858 of 2008 SMT. ASHA DEVI & ANR Versus RAJ KUMAR KESHRI & ANR ----------- 3 3.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners seem to be aggrieved by an order dated 20.3.2008 whereby and whereunder the Court below has rejected the application filed on 23.2.2008 on behalf of the petitioners for their examination by appointment of commission on their expense. Normally such relief was well permissible but taking into account not only the facts which have been mentioned in the impugned order but also that an application was filed by the petitioners themselves at the initial stage of hearing of the case wherein both of them had stated that they had authorized their husband to do Pairvi as also to give evidence on their behalf, this Court would not interfere with the impugned order. In this regard it has to be noticed that the petitioners in their application in the Court below had specifically stated that even that the signature of their respective husband on any paper may be treated to be true and executed on their behalf. In view of such clear authorization given by the petitioners before the Court below, this Court is of the opinion that the apprehension of the petitioners of being prejudiced on 2 account of their being not examined in person is wholly misconceived. In that view of the matter, there being no material irregularity much less jurisdictional error in the impugned order, this civil revision application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)