1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO. 123/2010. Arvind Chandrashekhar Mangrulkar and others. -VERSUS- Nagpur Municipal Corporation. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 03, 2011. Heard Shri A.S. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for the appellants and Shri J.B. Kasat, learned Counsel for respondent and perused order dated 05.10.2010. It is apparent that concurrent findings are being assailed before this Court. However, attention of this Court is invited to orders dated 05.10.2010, wherein, in the light of changed D.C.R. the appellants/ plaintiffs were permitted to move fresh application for compounding. 2 Shri Kasat, learned Counsel for respondent states that, that application is considered and rejected. Shri Jaiswal, learned Counsel contends that the said application has been rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite documents. He, therefore, seeks leave to supply appropriate documents and revised plan in terms of the new D.C.R. With liberty to appellants/ plaintiffs to move appropriate application with necessary plan for compounding, if it is open to him in accordance with law, present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. JUDGE Rgd