:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2008 IN IN IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2007 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2007 M/s. Fairdeal Constructions ..Petitioners versus Municipal Commissioner, Kolhapur Municipal Corporation & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. A. S. Dubey for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for the Respondents. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Two points are raised for Review of the Order of this court dated 2.11.2007. 2. First that the Revision was not maintainable in view of the Proviso to Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code. This point was not argued at the time of the final hearing of the matter. In any case, there is no merit in the submission. The impugned order was such that if it had been made in favour of the party applying for the Revision, it would have finally disposed of the proceedings in execution. Indeed, that is the result of the Order :2: made by this court in the Revision. 3. The other point that is argued is on the basis of the Roznama purported to have been written by the Sole Arbitrator. This point was also not argued before this court. It is also not shown by the learned counsel for the Review Petitioner that the Roznama was part of the record of the Revision. There is no merit in the Review Petition, which is hereby dismissed. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)