IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14807 of 2011 PARMANAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code. During audit, it was found that misappropriation was done by the clerk and cashier. The petitioner retired on 30.06.2006 as head clerk. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the Annexure-2, the letter written by the Assistant Engineer, Electricity to the Executive Engineer reflects that the accusation is against the clerk and cashier. Though the petitioner is alleged to have misappropriated about 1,000/-rupees. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against the clerk and cashier and the petitioner retired on 30.06.2006 when the F.I.R. was lodged in 2010, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail 2 in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 349 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner will file an undertaking before the learned court below that he shall make himself available as and when required by the investigating agency. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)