IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1929 OF 2008 Ravindra V. Gatlewar ..vs..Stae of Maharashtra. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri A. C. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for applicant. Shri Anup Parihar, APP for respondent-sole. CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATED : 23rd June, 2008. 1. Applicant-Ravindra has applied for bail. 2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. A. C. Dharmadhikari for applicant and learned APP Mr. Anup Parihar for respondent-sole. 3. The copy of FIR, statement of witnesses and the Post Mortem report disclosed that the accused No.1 assaulted victim by use of knife, sword and sticks. 4. The case proceeds on following facts :- (i) the date of assault is 4th September, 2007 and the incident took place at 7.30 p.m. and (ii) the victim was taken to hospital within less than one hour of the incident i.e. about 8.15 p.m. 5. The Post Mortem report reveals that the injuries are in five numbers. Most of the injuries are caused by stab, and are incised and are seen on removal of stitches to be tissue deep. 6. The injuries are seen to have internal damage as well it was discovered after removal of stitches in the process of Post Mortem examination. 7. The shock and haemorrhage due to multiple injuries and collective effect thereof is the cause of death. 8. Considering stab injuries, damage caused to internal organ and sudden death which is occurred in or round one hour's time, at this stage, is sufficient to attribute to the accused either knowledge or intention to cause the death of the victim. 9. On account of failure to file charge-sheet within 90 days another accused has been released on bail, would not ipso facto entitle the applicant for bail in above premises. 10. Considering the nature of involvement, nature of assault and the weapons used in the commission of offence and its magnitude, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 11. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE. Andurkar