BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. § 2009 PETITIONEERS 1. 6 Jagat Ram Uraon, B.A.M.S., aged about 42 years (date of birth 12.4.1968) Son of Jeera Lal Uraon, Occupation Contract Ayurved Medical Officer, Govt. Ayurvedic Hospital Narayanbur, Tahsii Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Schedule Tribe) Dr. Hemendra Kumar Sidar, B.A.M.S., aged about 42 years (date of birth 27.6.1968) son of Shri Tribhuvan Singh Sidar, Occupation Contract Ayurved Medical OffiCer, Govt. Ayurvedic Hospital Kardega, Block — Duldula, Tah. Kunkuri Distt. Jashpur (CG) (Schedule Tribe) VERSUS f 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Health and Medical Services, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2fThe Secretary, General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3f The Director, Health and Medical Services, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur M. (C.G.). 4. The’ Secretary, C.G. Public Service Commission, . Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). r. “ WRIT PETITION U/Ai226/2 27 OF THE CONSTITUTIONAQF INDIAL HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Division Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri 8a \ Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava JJ. Writ Petition {St No.21 14(2009 R Order for consideration , r 7 i ,_, Sd/- Post for pronouncement of Order ?- .4.2010 / / ga Sd/- i JUDdE ’V‘ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava PETITIONER Dr. Jagat Ram Uraon 85 another Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh 85 others Judge Hon’ble snr'i Satish K. A nihotri J sd/ a- Satish K. Agnihotrl‘; Judge HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Division Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri as Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, JJ. Writ Petition (S) No.2114/2oo9 PETITIONER Dr. Jagat Ram Uraon 8L another Versus State of Chhattisgarh 85 others Appearance: ' Shri Dashrath Lal, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3. mPONDENTS Shri Ashutosh Singh Kachhawaha, counsel for respondent No.4. O R D E R (Passed on &.O4.2010) Per Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 1. The issue involved in this petition is identical in nature to the issue of facts and law involved in W.P.(S) No.1746/09, 1990/09 85 2549/09, which have been dismissed by this Court vide its order dated 15.3.2010. 2. In View of the reasons mentioned in the order dated 15.3.2010 passed / . . / 7 in the aforesaid batch of petitions, this petition is also dismissed. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. A copy of the order dated 15.3.2010 passed in aforesaid batch of petitions be placed along with the record of this petition. l Praveen ‘ Sd/- Sd/. Satish K. Agnihotri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Judge