-= : 1 : =- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.34 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.34 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.34 OF 2006 Mr.Yellayya M. Jindam ..Petitioner. V/s. Mr.Ravindra T,. Chauhan & Ors. ..Respondents. Ms.Anita Bhaktwani for petitioner. Mr.Y.M.Pendse for respondent No.1. Mr.R.M.Palne for respondent Nos.3 & 4. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. No case is made out to interfere in the impugned order. However, it is made clear that it would be open for the petitioner to move the Executing Court and raise objections to executability of the order and / or may prefer an appeal before the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, if advised; within two weeks from today. 2. In the meanwhile, interim relief already operating in favour of the petitioner shall continue -= : 2 : =- i.e. only for 2 weeks from today. 3. It is needless to mention that after the expiry of two weeks, interim relief operating in favour of the petitioner shall automatically come to end. 4. It is also made clear that the petitioner is entitled to apply for interim relief before the appropriate forum and the said forum may decide without getting influenced by this order of extention whereby the interim relief is extended by this Court. 5. Petition is dismissed in limine with above liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. No order as to costs. ******