IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2006 Ujma Imtiyas Tamboli .. Applicant versus Imtiyas Ismail Tamboli .. Respondent ... None for the applicant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 21st August 2006. DATED : 21st August 2006. DATED : 21st August 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. From the office report, it appears that after the transfer of the matter from the Aurangabad Bench to Bombay Bench, notices were issues to the parties. Notice of applicant as well respondent have been returned unserved. However, notice has been served on the advocate for the applicant. Advocate for the applicant is absent. Since the notice sent to her personally has been unserved, nothing further can be done in the matter, Misc. Application is dismissed for non prosecution. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)