IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 RP.No. 845 of 2010(B) ------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DTD. 20.7.10 IN MACA 2511/09) .......................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): /2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------------------------------- THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM NOW REP. BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS JACOB, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS 1, 3 AND 4: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SINTO, S/O.ANTO, VADAKKE PEEDIKA HOUSE, ALOOR, VIA. IRINJALAKUDA, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 2. LIJITH, S/O.KUNJOLIPARAMBIL JOLLY, ELANDIKKARA, PUTHENVELIKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT.HARIFA BEEVI, W/O.THEDAVILAYIL IBRAHIMKUTTY, KUNNATHOOR. 4. A.K.ANIL, PCK BHAVAN, XII/160, THUNDATHIL, KARIYAVATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ul/- M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 845 OF 2010 IN M.A.C.A. NO. 2511 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010 O R D E R This R.P. is filed with a prayer for recovery of amount given as additional compensation from the owner, in the light of another appeal filed by the insurance company as M.A.C.A.130/10. M.A.C.A which was disposed of by me did not have a contention regarding the right of reimbursement as it was an appeal filed by the claimant. The question of recovery is a subject matter in M.A.C.A.130/10. I make it clear that when M.A.C.A.130/10 is taken up for disposing of after hearing all concerned the question of reimbursement of the additional compensation awarded also will be considered in that matter. With that observation this R.P. is closed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-