IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 6763 of 2008. Decided on: 15.06.2010. Bhagu Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Bindya Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has made representations for the redressal of his grievance vide Annexures A-1 and A-2. However, the same have not been decided by the respondents till date. The interest of justice will suffice if the respondents are directed to decide the same within a reasonable period. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to decide the representations made by the petitioner vide Annexures A-1 and A-2 in view of the letter dated 13th September, 1996, reference of which has been made in the reply filed by the respondent-State within a period of eight weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 15, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?