IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2005 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2005 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2005 Madhavi Shekhar Garud ..Appellant. V/s. Shri Shekhar Haribhau Garud ..Respondent. ----- Ms. Seema Sarnaik for the Appellant. Shri Sachin Punde for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : S.B.MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATE : APRIL 05, 2005. DATE : APRIL 05, 2005. DATE : APRIL 05, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for both sides. 2. The appellant wife and the respondent husband are also present. They have settled their matrimonial disputes amicably and accordingly have submitted the consent terms to this court. We have ascertained from both, husband and wife, that they have understood the contents of consent terms and thereafter, have signed the same. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for indentification. 3. In terms of the said consent terms, the husband and wife are willingly joining their matrimonial relationship and we find that they have voluntarily entertained into this consent terms. We, therefore, accept the said consent terms, as filed. 4. Hence, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the said consent terms by substituting the decree already passed by the Family Court. 5. The office is directed to draw the decree in terms to the consent terms in substitution of the decree under challenge. 6. Ordered accordingly. (D.B.BHOSALE,J) (S.B.MHASE,J) (D.B.BHOSALE,J) (S.B.MHASE,J) (D.B.BHOSALE,J) (S.B.MHASE,J) .....