IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1048 of 2006 Krishna Sah son of Shri Dhurub Sah. Versus State Of Bihar ----------- 6 15.09.2011 The accused petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 29.08.2006 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in Case No. 40 of 2003, Tr. SC No. 129 of 2006 by which the prayer of the petitioner to discharge for the offence punishable under Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act has been dismissed. After hearing both the parties and perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the contention of the petitioner is that no prior sanction in the proceeding has been taken for taking cognizance under Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act and as such no proceeding will proceed against the petitioner. Charge has also been framed. It appears from the impugned order that prayer of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that after the amendment in the Dowry Prohibition Act, no prior sanction is required to proceed with this case. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order and hence this petition is dismissed. Md. Ibrarul ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)