IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2033 of 2009 1.KEDAR MAHTO, son of late Deni Mahto 2.Govind Mahto, son of late Ganeshi Mahto 3.Shital Mahto, son of late Ganeshi Mahto All resident of village- Doman Bigha, P.O. Kataiya, P.S. Deo, District- Aurangabad(Bihar) Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in a complaint case under Sections 323, 379, 452,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Prevention of Witch Practices Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter relates to family dispute since the complainant is the brother of the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, whereas petitioner No.1 is the nephew of the complainant. It is stated that on account of quarrels taking place between the families of the petitioners and the complainant, this type of false and fabricated complaint case has been lodged. It is pointed out that in the same matter, the proceeding under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been initiated in which the police has reported that there was only exchange of abuse between the ladies of the family of the parties. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioners (1) Kedar Mahto, (2) Govind Mahto and (3) Shital Mahto in the event of their arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.B. Tripathi, 2 Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Aurangabad in Complaint Case No.589/2008 ( Tr. No.3365/2008), subject to the other applicable conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)