IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION. T.SUIT No.1 of 1987 IN PETITION No.119 of 1986 Purushottam R. Parekh & Anr ..Petitioner. Vs. Chandrakant Ratilal Parekh ..Defendant. None present for the parties. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. V. C. DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 28. 01. 2008. 28. 01. 2008. 28. 01. 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Order sheet dated 19.2.1997 indicates that the petitioner has expired. There is no material on record to show that any steps were taken to substitute the name of the deceased. In this view of the matter, petition is disposed of as "abated". (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J) DAGA,J) DAGA,J)