- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 138 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 93 OF 2001 M/s Ginza Industries Pvt. Ltd. .... PLAINTIFFS Vs. State Bank of India .... DEFENDANTS Mr. A.J. Rizvi, Advocate for Plaintiffs Mr. Prakash Shinde , Advocate for defendants CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th June, 2006 P.C. . Heard leaned Advocate appearing for the plaintiffs in support and the defendants, State Bank of India in opposition. 2. Perused the Affidavit in support and the Affidavit in reply. For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in support and in the light of the undertaking of the plaintiffs Advocate that all office objections will be removed within a - 2 - period of two weeks from today, the suit which has been dismissed for non removal of office objections stand restored to file. The chamber summons is made absolute accordingly. The delay is condoned. Notice of Motion no. 2993 of 2003 is allowed to be withdrawn in the light of above order. Needless to clarify that restoration of this suit shall not preclude the defendants from raising appropriate pleas including that the claim of the plaintiff is barred by law of limitation. All contentions in that behalf are expressly kept open. ( S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)