IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4760 of 2011 MANIK CHAND SAH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 01.04.2011 Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the BDO Kudra as Respondent no. 5. The petitioner submits that without any opportunity to present his defence the impugned order dated 28.2.2009 has been passed in finality directing him to deposit the amount of the food grains when he has justifiable explanation for the same. Counsel for the State points out from the impugned order itself that earlier also notices were given to the petitioner to which he did not respond. Those are matters to be appropriately considered by the authority concerned in his wisdom when finally adjudicating the matter. By consent of the Counsel for the parties this application is disposed in similar terms as CWJC No. 16366 of 2009 disposed on 28.2.2011. As directed therein the impugned notice dated 28.2.2009 shall be treated as a show cause notice. The petitioner shall file his response within six weeks from today, failing which the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. In view of the fact that notice has been directed to be treated as show cause question of any coercive action thereunder till final orders are not passed, does not arise. The writ application stands disposed in similar terms with similar directions as CWJC No. 16366 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)