1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10316 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 PTN Rajammal New Rice Mill, A Partnership Firm, represented by its Partner A.Vasantha Devi ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Inspector of Police, Tirumangalam Town Police Station, Tirumangalam-625 706. Madurai District. 2. The President, CITU Union, Reg.No.1297, MDU 1000 TN, Kappaloor-625 006. Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant the petitioner sufficient protection to carry on their business PTN RAJAMMAL RICE MILL at Madurai Main Road, Kappaloor, Madurai District, on the representation dated 11.08.2011 made to him, from the interference of the second respondent Trade Union or its officers or members to the loading and unloading of the goods of the petitioners at their place. For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Subbiah For Respondents ... Mr.R.Anandha Raj, Government Advocate, for R.1 ... Dispensed with for R.2 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant the petitioner sufficient protection to carry on their business PTN RAJAMMAL RICE MILL at Madurai Main Road, Kappaloor, Madurai District, on the representation dated 11.08.2011 made to him, from the interference of the second respondent Trade Union or its officers or members to the loading and unloading of the goods of the petitioners at their place. 2. Heard Mr.S.Subbiah, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandha Raj, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the first respondent. 3. In view of the order that is to be passed, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 5. The petitioner has made a representation on 11.08.2011 to the first respondent for police protection. Since the representation has not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed. 6. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 11.08.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. If the right of any third party will be affected, it is necessary that the authority should put such person on notice, so as to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 7. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No Costs. SD DEPUTY REGISTRAR ( Writs ) /TRUE COPY/ ASST REGISTRAR ssl/ts To: The Inspector of Police, Tirumangalam Town Police Station, Tirumangalam-625 706. Madurai District. 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVT PLEADER SR: 32391: DM::2011:OCTOBER:::11:: W.P.(MD)No.10316 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 20.09.2011 2P:3C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/