1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4045 OF 1994 Maharashtra Sainik Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jalna. .. PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others ... RESPONDENTS Mr.C.V.Thombre,Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. R.K.Ladda, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. ......................... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 12/07/2010 ORAL ORDER : 1. The matter was listed on 9/7/2010 for fixing it for hearing at the request of the petitioner, who then was represented by Mr. C.V.Thombre, Advocate. We granted liberty for early hearing and fixed the matter today i.e. on 12/7/2010. 2. Today when the matter is called out, Mr. M.S. Choudhari, the learned counsel seeks 2 weeks time. Mr. C.V. Thombre submits that earlier he had given no objection. 3. When the matters are listed for final hearing and that too at the request of the petitioners, the petitioners are expected to be ready with the matter. Adjournment can not be granted in a casual manner. 2 4. For that reason, we dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R.GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 4045.1994