IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.1658/2011 Decided on: 21.10.2011 _____________________________________________ Mela Ram. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Pandey, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for the respondents. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “That the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued by directing the respondents to make necessary entry in the revenue record and issue the OBC certificate to the petitioner and his family.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 7542/2010, titled as Shyam Lal versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 6.12.2010. If that be so, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 similar treatment shall also be extended to the petitioner in the above referred decision, in case the petitioner is also similarly situated, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the competent authority, i.e. Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Chopal. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs . 4. Copy Dasti on usual terms. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 21.10.2011 *awasthi*