IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 4TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 33995 of 2006(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M.R.G. SUBBAIYAAN, S/O. RAMASWAMY GOUNDER, DOOR NO.H/13, HOUSING UNIT COIMBATORE ROAD, METTUPALAYAM, TAMIL NADU STATE. 2. K. KARUNAKARAN, S/O. KARUPPANNA CHETTIAR, DOOR NO.6, CO-OPERATIVE COLONY, METTUPALAYAM, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, PALAKKAD BRANCH, 1ST FLOOR, CENTURY COMPLEX, MATHAKOVIL STREET, SULTANPET, PALAKKAD-01. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COIMBATORE, STATE OF TAMIL NADU. 5. THE REVENUE OFFICER, METTUPALAYAM, COIMBATORE DISTRICT, STATE OF TAMIL NADU. R1&2 ADV. SRI.T.V.GEORGE, SC, KFC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.12.1.2004 PASSED IN W.P.(C) NO.841/2004 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P2: .DO. DT.13.7.2006 PASSED IN W.P.(C) NO.18172/2006 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P3: TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT FROM 1.9.1996 TO 11.12.2006 IN RESPECT OF LOAN NO.80123810. P4: .DO. FROM 1.2.1999 TO 11.12.2006 .DO. P5: TRUE COPY OF R.R. NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONERS AND MRG SANGEETHA. P5(a): TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P5. P6: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT.7.2.2005 SENT BY R2. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.33995 of 2006 .................................................................... Dated this the 26th day of September, 2008. JUDGMENT This is the third writ petition filed by the petitioner in the same matter, first two having been disposed of vide Exts.P1 and P2 judgments. Standing Counsel appearing for the KFC submitted that petitioner has not complied with direction contained in any of the earlier judgments. The W.P. is accordingly devoid of any merit and is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms