IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10470 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MURALI V., MANTHEMPILLIL HOUSE METHALA PO, PERUMBAVOOR BY ADV. SRI.N.K.KARNIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT , SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES (A) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 10470 of 2010 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 26 th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Upper Division Clerk working in the Water Resources Department. He was deployed to the Local Self Government Institutions as per order in G.O.(MS) 64/2007/LSGD dated 2.3.2007. Pursuant to the said order, he joined duty at Ramamangalam Panchayat on 14-05-2007. The contention of the petitioner is that he had completed more than two years stay on such deployment and, therefore, he is entitled to get repatriation to the parent department. It is the contention of the petitioner that even going by Ext.P1 Government Order, he is entitled for such a repatriation. The grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition pertains to the inaction on the part of the respondents in repatriating the petitioner to his parent department. Though the respondents have prepared a list of persons entitled to be repatriated to the parent department in Ext.P4, his name is wrongly excluded, it is submitted. It is in the said circumstances that the petitioner has approached this Court filing this writ petition. WPC.10470/2010 : 2 : 2. Aggrieved by Ext.P4 inasmuch as his name was excluded from it, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 representation before the 2 nd respondent. It is evident from Ext.P1 itself that on completion of two years stay of deployment, normally the persons deployed to Local Self Government Department are entitled to get repatriation. Therefore, in case a person junior to the petitioner is included in Ext.P4, the petitioner is entitled to get repatriation. However, that is a matter which is to be looked into by the competent authority. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation expeditiously and pass orders thereon, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks