IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15519 of 2011 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KUMAR SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 25.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. According to the prosecution case itself six persons were caught at the spot and they disclosed the names of their associates. Admittedly, neither petitioner was caught at the spot nor his name came in the statements of those accused persons who were arrested at the spot. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that on the alleged date of the occurrence, petitioner had gone to attend sharad ceremony of one Rajendra Sao and he was arrested by the police from the house of aforesaid Rajendra Sao on 17.1.2011 and subsequently, he was remanded in this case on 20.1.2011. Although the learned Sessions Judge has mentioned at para 4 of his impugned order that the petitioner was caught by the police at the spot on chase but submission on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be correct and it appears to me that above stated finding of the learned Sessions Judge is nothing but only an error on record. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Sao, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in Dumaria 2 P.S. Case no. 5/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)