IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19546 of 2011 Dhiraj Kumar Mishra @ Dhiraj Mishra Versus The State Of Bihar 3/ 08.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Allegation is about abduction of informant’s son for payment of ransom. Before recovery, victim boy was with this petitioner in a room and a ransom of Rs. 15 lakh was demanded during the period of abduction of the victim. Victim boy is examined under Sections 161 and 164 of Cr. P.C. The only difference in between both is that dancing and singing was hobby of victim boy not the reading and he was expecting a career in film industry but in both the statements, it is said that on the point of his chance in film he was allured. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. Shailendra Bh. Pd. ( Mandhata Singh, J.)