-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRI. APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.1347 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO.485 OF 2006 Shri.Sunil Atmaram More ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.P.Wagh Advocate for Applicant Mr.A.S.Gadkari APP for State ... CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 10, 2008 DATE : MARCH 10, 2008 DATE : MARCH 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Considered the evidence. Perused the judgment. Prima facie, there is sufficient involvement of the applicant-accused. We are not in favour of granting bail. 3. Application is rejected. Prayer for expediting the hearing is also rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]