IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6286 of 2008 Between: M/s. New Anupama Restaurant A Partnership Concern, having its Office at Mahaboob Commercial Complex, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500 016, rep,. by its Managing Partner V. Rama Rao ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Special Commissioner, Hyderabad. 2 Additional Commissioner Greater Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Medical Officer, Circle No. V. Greater Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in closing the petitioner's Restaurant in ground and Second Floor situated at Mehaboob Commercial Complex, Ameerpet, Hyderabad as being arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Article 14, 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India and apart from violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission for extension of the 2nd floor for running the business and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents-Corporation. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made an application to the Assistant Medical Officer, Circle No.V, GHMC-3rd respondent seeking trade licence for running a restaurant in the second floor of the premises bearing Pr.No.8-3- 944/9/3/A, B & C, Ameerpet, Cross Roads, Hyderabad and it remained unattended and therefore, necessary direction is required to be given to the 3rd respondent to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. 3. The factual aspect of pendency of the application filed by the petitioner is not in dispute. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition at the admission stage directing the Assistant Medical Officer, Circle No.V, GHMC-3rd respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner seeking trade licence for running the business in the second floor of premises bearing Pr.No.8-3- 944/9/3/A, B & C, Ameerpet, Cross Roads, Hyderabad and pass appropriate orders thereon within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:26th June, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}