Crl.M.No.M-17499 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-17499 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: June 30, 2010 Rakesh and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.128, dated 14.5.2010, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 506, 307 IPC, registered at Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonepat. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully. Briefly stated, as per prosecution case, eight persons sustained injuries in this case. One of the injured Anand received sharp edged injury on his neck and also received injuries on his head including three fractures on his head. Injured Karan Singh also received eight injuries, including four on his head with blunt and sharp edged weapon. Injured Ishwar also received five injuries including two on his head. Even injured Ramesh, Rajesh, Pushpa and Usha received injuries on their heads. Petitioner- Rakesh was armed with Kulhari, whereas petitioner-Rajesh was armed with lathi. Hence, specific role has been attributed to both the petitioners- accused. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any Crl.M.No.M-17499 of 2010 (O&M) -2- opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners- Rakesh and Rajesh for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 30.6.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge