IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.241 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.508 OF 2006 Suresh Sudkoji Shirke .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Nitin Sejpal and Pooja Bhojne for the applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, A.P.P for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 05th March 2009. : 05th March 2009. : 05th March 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. As a condition for grant of bail, the applicant has been directed to report to Mandangad police station, District Ratnagiri on every first Saturday of every calendar month till the disposal of the appeal. 3. In paragraph No.7 of the application it is asserted that the applicant is employed at Mumbai. It is stated that it is difficult for the applicant to visit Mandangad in Ratnagiri district. The applicant (2) has offered to report to Dindoshi police station in Mumbai instead of Mandangad police station. 4. In view of averments made in the application, modification to the aforesaid extent will have to be made. 5. Hence, the application is disposed of by passing following order: Clause (ii) of paragraph No.3 of the order dated 24th November 2006 in Criminal Application No.558 of 2006 is modified and the applicant is directed to mark attendance at Dindoshi police station in Mumbai instead of Mandangad police station in District Ratnagiri on every first Saturday of every calendar month till the disposal of the appeal. (A.S.Oka,J)