1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.127 OF 2010. SAU. SAROJ VINOD SARDAR VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri N. B. Bargat, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D. B. Patel, APP for State. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 14th DECEMBER 2010. 1. By this petition, titled as petition for issue of writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner seeks direction to bring Vinod Sahadeorao Sardar or his corpse. 2. Admittedly, it is not a case of wrongful detention warranting issue of writ of habeas corpus. Admittedly, it is a case that Vinod Sahedeorao Sardar is reported to be missing. Even as per the version of the petitioner, he is not under detention either by private person or public servant. 3. This Court had issued notices and received on record the affidavits of the Investigating Officer and Superior Officers. On account of 2 certain discrepancies in the affidavits, further affidavits were called. 4. We have on record entire calender of investigation. The details of manner in which the investigation was supervised and from the contents, we were prima facie satisfied with the fact that generally the investigation was in order and no stone was left unturned. 5. In order to have the satisfaction of the petitioner, we had directed the Investigating Officer to permit the petitioner's advocate the access to the investigation papers to find out whether any of the avenues of investigation have not been resorted. 6. Learned Advocate Mr. Bargat states after perusal of the investigation papers that the investigation has been done thoroughly, however, it need not be immediately closed and if some more clue is available, the same could be given to the police and the investigation could be further continued. 7. While this request can be accepted, the petition need not remain pending. 8. Accepting the position that the investigation has been carried out satisfactorily, we dispose of the petition and record that if the 3 petitioner provides any clue or if police otherwise comes to know in the process of investigation or from any other source the trace of the person reported missing the investigation would necessarily be carried out to its possible, logical end. 9. With these observations, we dispose of the petition. Judge Judge //mule//