HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No.367 of 2011 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) The order against which this appeal is preferred permitted the respondents-writ petitioners to collect the fish in the schedule tank and sell them under the supervision of the fourth respondent. While several allegations are made in the appeal by Sri R.V.Nagabhushana Rao including that the respondents- writ petitioners did not have a licence, I consider it inappropriate to examine any of the contentions since the substantive writ petition is pending adjudication before the learned single Judge. Ends of justice would be met if the interim order under challenge is modified, directing the fourth respondent to conduct public auction for collection and sale of fish and keep the sale proceeds in a deposit. The said deposit shall be subject to the final orders which will be passed in the writ petition. The Writ Appeal is disposed of, accordingly. Both the appellant and the respondents-writ petitioners are permitted to participate in the auction. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO ___________________________________ JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Note: Issue operative portion of the order by wire at party’s costs. B/o DR/LVL