IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24414 of 2010 DR.MD.JAMALUDDIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. S.N.P. Sinha, Sr. Advocate For the Vigilance: Mr. Prashant Pratap 6 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance. Allegedly, the petitioner amassed disproportionate assets to the known sources of his income and it is stated that Rs 26,84,134/- was found excess to his income. Although Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me by referring several income tax returns as well as by submitting that the petitioner has earned huge amount from his agricultural land as well as from the income of his wife but I am not at all convinced with the aforesaid submission. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that as a matter of fact, his lawyer of income tax inadvertently did not file the return from the income of agricultural property and that was the reason the aforesaid differences was shown by the Vigilance Department. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail petition stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below in connection with 2 Special Case No. 03 of 2010 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 05 of 2010 and seek regular bail and if petitioner does so, the concerned court below shall consider the regular bail application of the petitioner on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)