IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 37153 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.03.2011 Shivani and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to provide adequate security/protection to the petitioners as their life and liberty is in danger because they got married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 and 5. Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from HC Satnam Singh, states that the private respondents have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. In fact, both the families have got together to perform the marriage ceremony of the present petitioners on 09.12.2010. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 29.03.2011 mohan