1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13. WP/1547/2010 (VISHWANATH BHIVSAN BHATANE V/S THE SUB REGISTRAR CO- OP. SOCIETIES BEED AND Others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.D.R.Bhadekar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.M.M.Joshi, Adv., for respondent nos. 2 and 3. Mr.K.S.Patil, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:19/10/2010 1. Mr.M.M.Joshi, learned Counsel, appears for respondent nos. 2 and 3. He has already tendered reply, copy received by Mr.Bhadekar, learned Counsel. Learned A.G.P. appears for respondent nos. 1 and 4. 2. Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is, after a slumber of virtually nine years, proceedings for recovery are initiated by respondent no.1 for recovery of loan availed from respondent no.2. Mr.Bhadekar submits, even after 2 challenge to the order dt. 11.12.2009, the regular recoveries are made by deducting from the wages from the petitioner and, consequently, more than Rs. 30,000/- are recovered by the creditor Bank. His grievance is, in terms of Section 44-A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, the recovery could not be double than the principal amount advanced. 3. Since the petitioner has efficacious remedy in terms of Section 154 of the said Act, on instructions, learned Counsel for the petitioner withdraws the writ petition. The authorities in terms of Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act shall consider the deductions made from the petitioner after the certificate dt.3.9.2009 and shall be adjusting the same as part of the 50 per cent deposit in terms of Section 154(2A) of the said Act. All questions are kept open, to be agitated before the 3 authority. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1547-10wp