1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.519 OF 2009 WITH C.A.NO.634 OF 2009 AND C.A.NO.1090 OF 2009 Satish Yeshwant Kulkarni. ..Appellant. Vs. The Police Commissioner, Railways, Mumbai. ..Respondent. Mr.N.D.Jaywant for the Appellant. Mrs.G.P.Mulekar, AGP. for the Respondent. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : 2nd Sept.2009 PC : 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, appeal is heard finally. In my view, this is a matter in which ad interim relief has to be granted specially it is the case of the plaintiff that his hoarding has been erected with licence of the B.M.C. and does not stand on the land of the defendant. Without expressing anything further on merits, it is expected that this issue will be considered and decided in the main motion 2 along with other issues. Hearing of the motion is expedited. It is made clear that the plaintiff will be entitled to display his advertisement if he has a valid and subsisting licence. It is further made clear that display of such hoardings will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. Appeal is disposed off. 2. In view of the above order, civil applications do not survive and the same are also disposed off. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)