IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26480 of 1995 Between: Bondada Rajaji, S/o.Late Narasinga Rao, R/o.Tuni, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The General Manager, Telecommunications, Fort Gate, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 2 The Divisional Engineer, Telecommunications, Fort street, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 The Accounts Officer, Telecommunications, Divisional Engineer’s Office, Kakinada, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring Communication No.TA-EG/COM/PTS/8/94-96/110/dated at RMY the 3-11-1995 as discriminatory and unconstitutional insofar as it relates to the imposition of conditions. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K.V.SUBRAMANYA NARUSU Counsel for Respondents: MS. M.PADMAVATHI YADAV (STANDING COUNSEL FOR THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT) The Court made the following ORDER: After hearing learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents at length, learned Counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ________________ N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 14th September, 2004. Ksr/Ak* ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.The General Manager, Telecommunications, Fort Gate, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Telecommunications, Fort street, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3.The Accounts Officer, Telecommunications, Divisional Engineer’s Office, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4.Two CD copies.