IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.811 of 2007 DILIP SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 28.10.2009 The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 26.8.2006 passed by S.D.O., Begusarai, whereby he cancelled the retail PDS dealer licence of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the licencing authority had passed the impugned order on the report of the Collector instead of exercising his own judicial mind to the facts of the case. Though there may be substance in the contention of the petitioner, he ought to have moved the learned Collector in appeal itself or before the Commissioner in revision. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I observe that if petitioner prefers an appeal or revision before the respondent authority, he will dispose of the same sympathetically considering the plea for condonation of delay in filing the same as the petitioner was continuing his remedy before this Court since 2007. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. Anilkr.sinha (S.P.Singh,J.)