IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. (S/S) 152 of 2010 Satish Chandra Pandey …Petitioner Versus District Judge, Nainital and others …Respondents Present: Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D. S. Patni, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. D. S. Patni, Advocate for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is a dependent of Freedom Fighter. He appeared in an interview for Class IV post in District Judgeship, Nainital. The result was declared but he was not given the benefit of 5% horizontal reservation for the said post. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has limited his prayer that his pending representation before the concerned authorities may be disposed of in accordance with law. 4. As such, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Judge, Nainital (respondent no. 1) to dispose of the pending representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 5. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 23.11 2011 . Kuldeep