IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4077 of 2009 Date of decision: March 17, 2009. Kuldeep Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - (Oral): The petitioner seeks a direction for the allotment of an alternative residential plot on the basis of communication dated 10.12.2008 and 20.1.2009 (Annexures P-6 and P-7). Plot No.254, measuring 405 square meters, in Sector 55, Gurgaon was allotted to one Shri C.L. Dhir vide allotment letter dated 16.11.1992. The petitioner purchased the said plot from the original allottee and the same was transferred in his name by the Estate Officer, Gurgaon vide memo dated 30.3.1993 (Annexure P-3). It appears that during the process of re-demarcation, the above mentioned plot was omitted and was not available at the site. The petitioner, therefore, approached the respondent-authorities for allotment of an alternative plot. Though, it is the petitioner who, for no good reasons, has been made to suffer, yet it was after a prolonged correspondence that the Estate Officer, HUDA at Gurgaon vide his memo dated 10.12.2008 (Annexure P- 6) recommended allotment of an alternative plot to him. Those recommendations have been further endorsed and forwarded by the Administrator, HUDA, Gurgaon to the Chief Administrator, HUDA at Panchkula vide memo dated 20.01.2009 (Annexure P-7). No final decision, however, has been taken so far. The petitioner has accordingly approached this Court. Having heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and on perusal of the memos dated 10.12.2008 and 20.1.2009 (Annexures P-6 and P-7), prima-facie, I am satisfied that there is no justification either in equity or law in delaying the allotment of an alternative plot to the petitioner. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take cognizance of the above stated facts and decide the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot, as early as possible, but not later than one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Dasti March 17, 2009. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge