IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.49 OF 2006 In WRIT PETITION NO.1887 OF 2005 Chithralaya Exhibitors (India) & Ors. : Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.R.Chagla i/b. Dhruve Liladhar & Co., for the petitioners. Mr.A. Sayed, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr.Sachin Satpute i/b. Malvi Ranchoddas & Co., for respondent No.4. ... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATE : APRIL 7, 2006. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Considering what is set out, we do not find that the amendment will change the nature of the petition or alter the cause of action. Hence, Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. F.I. REBELLO, J. ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.