HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.4915 OF 2008 ORDER: The present petition is filed by the petitioners challenging the charge sheet and seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.535 of 2008 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad, Rangareddy District. The brief facts of the case are as follows: On 12.06.2008 at about 1800 hours, the Principal of Vignan Prabodhananda Prashanth Niketan School, Kondapur gave a complaint against the accused alleging that the accused came to their school on 12.06.2008 at about 1.30 p.m. enquiring about the English teacher for class VIII during last year. On being told that Mr.Simhachalam Naidu was the teacher, they proceeded towards him with an intention to kill him and severely injured him alleging that he had beaten Master Manikanta during the last academic year because of which the boy ran away from the house. The said Simhachalam Naidu sustained severe injuries on the right forehead and damage to the right eye apart from hits and blows all over the body. Hence the complainant requested to take action against the accused. The main grounds urged by the learned counsel for the petitioners are— 1. While the complaint is lodged by the principal, whereas the aggrieved party is the English teacher; 2. This is a counterblast due to the fact that the first petitioner went to the school of the de facto complainant and questioned the erroneous act of the English teacher; 3. There is no specific averment against the petitioners in the charge sheet. This Court perused the entire records and also the submissions made by the petitioners counsel and also the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. It is seen from the record, the first point is concerned, in Criminal Law anybody can set the law in motion. There is no need of Court to set the law in motion. Accordingly, the first point is rejected as not maintainable. The second point is concerned, this is a case registered as a counterblast. Since the petitioners questioned the English teacher, this is the factual aspect, which can be agitated before the trial Court, at the time of trial, and The third point is concerned, there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. This also can be agitated before the trial Court. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.535 of 2008 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. In any event, the petitioners herein are at liberty to raise all the points at the time of trial and further, petitioners 1 and 3 being practicing advocates, their presence before the trial Court is dispensed with, except on the dates insisted by the learned Magistrate. ___________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Date:9th July 2010 Rns