1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2818/2009 Subhash Chandra & Ors. vs State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER:6.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.CS Kotwani, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Bhati, Asstt to AAG. <><><> Learned counsel for the parties submits that the issue raised by the petitioner in this writ petition has been answered in favour of the petitioner in judgment delivered by this Court in Smt. Vishnu Kanwar & 157 Ors Vs. State of Raj. & Ors reported in 2009 WLC (Raj.) (UC) 186. In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioner is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the period consumed by the petitioner in undergoing training necessary for appointed as Prabodhak, the period of leave sanctioned or the leave availed for the reason beyond control as part of teaching experience acquired. The period aforesaid is also not required to be considered as break in service. As such, the respondents should act expeditiously to give effect to the select list relating to the petitioner and also relating to the persons similarly situated, as far as possible within a period of one and half months from today by giving appointment to them, if they are otherwise 2 eligible. It shall be open for the respondents to demand original documents and other relevant facts from the petitioner to get satisfied about their claim for the period relating to teaching experience and leave in question. The petitioner's name has appeared in the select list and his result has been withheld only on account referred above, therefore, the respondents shall declare the result and give the relief to the petitioner accordingly. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-