IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. NO :4465 of 2009 Between: 1. D. Ramesh and another. ..... PETITIONERS AND C. Ram Reddy. .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:4465 OF 2009 ORDER: Aggrieved by order, dated 3.7.2008 in I.A.No.2399 of 2008 in C.M.A.No.190 of 2008 passed by the learned II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the present revision petition has been filed. The petitioners herein are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff before the Court below. Originally, the plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.227 of 2008 for permanent injunction. Along with the suit, he also filed an application in I.A.No.196 of 2008 for temporary injunction. The Court below allowed the said application subject to condition of deposit of monthly rents by the plaintiff. Having aggrieved by the conditions imposed by the lower Court, the plaintiff filed the above C.M.A. Along with the C.M.A., the plaintiff also filed an application in I.A.No.2399 of 2008 for temporary injunction, pending disposal of the C.M.A. The lower appellate Court passed exparte interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the property in dispute. Having aggrieved by the same, the present revision has been filed by the defendants. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material on record. The order under revision is an exparte order. While passing the order under revision, urgent notice was ordered. The above application viz., I.A.No.2399 of 2008 is still pending. The issuance of notice is nothing but an opportunity to the other side to put forth their case. If the revision petitioners are aggrieved, they can move the appellate Court by filing an appropriate application. The approach of the revision petitioners is a premature one. Therefore, I do not find any grounds to interfere with the order under revision. Hence, the revision petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. However, the revision petitioners are at liberty to move the appropriate Court by filing an appropriate application. No order as to costs. _________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 24th September, 2009 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:4465 OF 2009 24.09.2009