HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Agpeal No. 311] 1991 VER$US State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhath'sgarh) Thmugh Police Station— Kelhari, Sarguja. CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 j 2 I OF THE OODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Appearance: None for the appellant. Shri Ashish Shnkla, Government Advocate for the State. Division-Bench:- Hon’ble Shti T.P. Sharma & Hon’ble shri R.L.Jhanwar,JJ ORAL JUDGMENT (03.02.2010) Per T.P.Sharma, J. 1. The accused] appenant has pmfen'ed this appeal against me judgment of conviciion and Older of sentence dated 6.2.1991, passed by the Sessions Judge and Additional Sessw'ns Judge, Manendragarh, District Sarguja in S.T.No.41/ 1988, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 302/.34, 201 of the [PC and sentenced for impxisonment for life and R.I. for 5 years. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the appellant- Mst Sundan Bai has been mleased on pmbanon by the State Government Mst. Sundari Bai w/o Tilakxaj Singh Thakur, R/o Tarbaham, Police Stau'on Kelhari, Dishict Sarguja (MP) (Now CG) HIGH COURT OF C Ctiminal APPELLANT RESPONDENT @ In View of the above on account of release of the appellant on this appeal becomes infructuous. Acconiingly, the 3. , \ same'is dismissed asdnfructuous. , /’ 7*\ \ V , j? \ _Sd/- \ \ Sd/ R'L' Jhanwa‘? T.P. sharma fax; j‘gudge e K Judge r ’ ’