IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 12791 of 2008 Between: 1 Kandukuri Venkatachary S/o.thirupathaiah R/o.H.52-57, Gudiwada, Sundaragiri village Chigurumamidi Mandal,Karimnagar district 2 Kandukuri Murali S/o.Venkatachary R/o.H.52-57, Gudiwada, Sundaragiri village Chigurumamidi Mandal,Karimnagar district ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, to the Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2 The Superintendent of Police,Karimnagar District Karimnagar 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, Chiguru Mamidi Police Station, Chiguru Mamidi Proper and Mandal, Karimnagar District 4 Sri Buchi Reddy, Sub Inspector of Police, Chiguru Mamidi Police Station, Chiguru Mamidi proper and Mandal, Karimnagar district 5 Gyni Kanakaiah S/o.Venkata Narsaiah Karimnagar Road, Sundaragiri vilalge Chigurumamidi Mandal Karimnagar district 6 Gyni Thirupathi S/o.Narayana Karimnagar Road, Sundaragiri vilalge Chigurumamidi Mandal Karimnagar district .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in calling the petitioners to the police station Chigurumamidi and threatening to execute a ratification deed/sale deed regarding the land of the petitioners admeasuring 3 acres 04 guntas in Sy.No.679/A of Sundaragiri village as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of Articles, 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequenty direct the respondents no.3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to pressure the petitioners to execute a ratification deed /sale deed regarding the land of the petitioners admeasuring 3 acres 04 guntas in Sy.No.679/A of Sundaragiri village, Chiguru Mamidi Mandal, Karimangar district. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.12791 of 2008 ORDER: According to the petitioner, he and his two brothers, namely, Kandukuri Damodar and Kandukuri Anand inherited the agricultural lands admeasuring Acs.3.38 gts. and Acs.7.05 gts. in Sy.Nos.611 and 683 situated in Sundaragiri village of Chigurumamidi Mandal, Karimnagar District, which belonged to their father . It is his case that he purchased the land admeasuring Acs.3.04 gts. in Sy.No.679/A of Sundaragiri village. When some disputes arose between the petitioner and his brothers with regard to partition of the properties belonged to their father, he filed a suit in O.S.No.407 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif, Karimnagar, seeking partition of the lands left by their father and declaration that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.3.04 gts. in Sy.No.679/A of Sundaragiri village, and the same was decreed on 27.07.1998. While so, his brothers sold away his exclusive property i.e., the land admeasuring Acs.3.04 gts. in Sy.No.679/A in favour of the father of respondent No.5 and respondent No.6. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondents 3 and 4, under the influence of respondents 5 and 6, are calling him to the police station and harassing him mentally, physically and making him wait for hours together in the police station and pressuring him to execute a ratification/sale deed in favour of respondents 5 and 6. Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submits that the police have neither interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioner and his brothers nor between the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6 and they never called the petitioner to the police station and harassed him mentally and physically. In view of the above, respondents 1 to 4 are directed neither to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and his brothers nor between the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6, and the petitioner shall not be summoned to the police station and harassed, without following the due process of law. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J 25.11.2008 v v