CRP 137/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The defendants in Title Suit No.63/2008 by the present application has c hallenged the order dated 24.02.2009 passed by the learned Munsiff No.1 at Guwah ati, whereby and whereunder the prayer of the present respondent No.1, who is th e plaintiff in the said suit, for amendment of the pleadings in the suit has bee n allowed. It appears from the order dated 24.02.2009 that an application under Ord er 6 Rule 17 of the CPC was filed for amendment of the pleadings of the plaint b y way of inserting paragraph 9A in the plaint as well as in giving description o f the boundaries of the suit property in the schedule. The learned Court below h as found that to decide the dispute between the parties effectively and complete ly, such boundaries are required to be mentioned and the statement made in parag raph 9A needs to be inserted. The learned Court below, however, while recording such finding has also recorded certain findings on the merit of the suit which o ught not to have been done. The amendment sought for having found to be required for the purpose of deciding the suit effectively and completely, I do not find any infirmity or ill egality which requires interference in exercise of the jurisdiction under Articl e 227 of the Constitution of India. However, the observation/finding recorded by the learned Trial Court on the merit of the suit shall not be taken into consid eration while deciding the suit. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed with the above observatio n. No costs. The parties are directed to appear before the learned court below on 04. 02.2011.