WPSS 3031/2001 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri M.S. Pal, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Sri D.N. Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Petitioner claims that juniors to her have been promoted prior to her ignoring the consideration of the petitioner at that time. If the assertion of the petitioner is correct, then there is clear cut violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, respondents are directed to promote the petitioner and give the other consequential benefits w.e.f. the date her juniors have been promoted, in case any junior has been promoted prior to promotion of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (P.C.V., J.) 2.4.2008 Prabodh