1 79 ao.287.11 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 287 OF 2011 Mrs. Asha Ramesh Gorde. ... Appellant Versus The Maharashtra Housing Area Development authority. ... Respondent ----- Ms. Indu Prakash Tripathi i/b Mr. Raj J. Khude for the Appellant. Mr. P.G.Lad for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28 th March, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2 By the impugned order, the learned trial Judge has declined to grant ad-interim relief of injunction. 3 Perusal of the impugned order shows that the contention of the Respondent was that the documents produced by the Appellant and especially the vacation notice were fabricated. It appears that the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent produced a photocopy of the vacation notice dated 28 th May, 2001. The learned trial Judge has made 2 79 ao.287.11 an observation that the documents which are filed by the Appellant appear to be doubtful. 4 In my view, while adjourning the notice of motion for filing reply, such a finding could not have been recorded inasmuch as there was no reply filed by the Respondent and the Appellant had no opportunity to meet the documents on which reliance was placed by the Respondent. 5 Hence, interests of justice will be served if the notice of motion itself is expedited and ad-interim relief granted by this Court is continued till the disposal of the Notice of Motion. 6 Hence, I pass the following order: i. The impugned order is quashed and set aside ; ii. Reply, if any, to be filed within a period of three weeks from today ; iii. Hearing of the notice of motion is expedited ; iv. The trial Court shall make an endeavour to decide the notice of motion by 10 th June, 2011 ; 3 79 ao.287.11 v. Ad-interim relief granted on 11 th March, 2011 by this Court shall continue to operate till the disposal of the notice of motion ; vi. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. [ A.S.OKA, J ]