1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.588 OF 2009 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.932 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3666 OF 2009 Shri Kiran Dhansing Rajput .... Appellant Vs. city Realcom Ltd. .... Respondent Ms M.S. Jagtap i/b Shri Shekhar Jagtap for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. & B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED: JANUARY 08, 2010 P.C: The appellant takes exception to the order passed by the learned Company Judge dated 9-9-2009. It is the contention of the appellant that prejudice would be caused to the rights of the appellant in as much as one Smt. Nirmala Bhosale, who was appearing as counsel for the Company, has been appointed to Chair the Meeting. A perusal of the record would reveal that the order dated 9-9-2009 has been 2 passed with the consent of both the parties. It is further to be seen that apart from a bald allegation regarding bias against the said counsel, the appellant has not placed any material on the record to substantiate his said allegation. No case is made out for interference in the impugned order. The appeal is dismissed. Needless to say, the interim relief granted stands vacated. ACTING C.J. B.R. GAVAI, J.