IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 92 of 2009 Puran Chandra Bhatt ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another .………. Respondents. Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Date of Judgment: 08.07.2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the petitioner has instructed him not to press the instant petition. He, therefore, prays that the instant writ petition be disposed of as not pressed. Learned counsel for the respondent states, that he has no objection to the suggestion made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 08.07.2010 08.07.2010 Amit