1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5845/2010 C.E.O. Z. P. Yavatmal and another Vs. Mohd. Asif Mohd. Imrad and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. V. V. Naik, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Patel, Adv. for respondents 1 to 8. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER13, 2010. Heard. After hearing Advocate Naik for petitioners and Advocate Patel for respondents 1 to 8, I find that necessary documents like cut-off marks for selection and the select list are not placed on record. The person, who has secured 38% marks is also allowed to continue by petitioners without any action. However, I find prima facie some substance in contention that merely because one person has secured less marks, all cannot be directed to be absorbed in employment. However, as documents are insufficient to support arguments being advanced by Advocate Naik, with liberty to petitioner to take further appropriate steps and to file fresh petition on the same cause of action, present petition is disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar