IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. M-23 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.03.2011 Gautam Narain Singh ...Appellant Versus Mrs. Vandana Pawar .....Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Rohit Ahuja, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rajesh Moudgil, Advocate for the respondent. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that during the pendency of the appeal before this court, the matter in dispute has been compromised. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that as per his instructions, 50% of permanent alimony settled between the parties, has also been paid to the respondent and a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short “the Act”) has already been filed in the court and the same is now fixed for August 12, 2011 for 2nd motion. In view of the aforesaid development, he seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal, however, with liberty to get the same revived, in case the divorce petition filed by the parties under Section 13-B of the Act is not accepted on any ground. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 08.03.2011 sharmila