IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16942 of 2011 Ranjeet Paswan Late Yogendra Paswan Vill.-Udapatti , Panchayat Bathua Bujurg,P.S.-Musrigharari,Dist.-Samastipur Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Thru The Principal secretary ,Rural Development Department Government Of Bihar,Patna 2. The Dist. Magistrate ,Samastipur 3. The District Development Commissioner, Dist.-Samastipur 4. The Block Development Officer, Block-Sarairanjan District.- Samastipur 5. The District Managar,Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Samastipur 6. The officer in charge, Musrigharari Police station, Samastipur. ---------------------------------- 2 09.12.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner prays for quashing letter dated 6..9.2011 contained in Memo no. 2010, issued by the Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan, Samastipur by which he has been directed to deposit Rs. 22,24,503.50/- towards the value of undistributed rice supplied to him at different intervals under SGRY/FFW scheme. The petitioner, while referring to letter dated 6.9.2011 and the FIR, namely, Musarighari Police Station Case No. 95 of 2011 dated 13.9.2011 lodged against him by the Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan, submits that respondents are not sure about the quantity/value of rice lying with him after distribution, as in the FIR it is alleged that Rs.41,62,991.60/- , excluding Rs.50,000/- deposited by the petitioner, was to be deposited by him towards 3038.68 quintals undistributed rice. However, in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit, it has been averred by the petitioner that 299.65 quintals and 602.30 quintals rice of SGRY and FFW scheme respectively (total 2 902.03 quintals) had been left undistributed with him. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern this writ application as well. This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would further deposit Rs.50,000/- within six weeks. Representation filed by the petitioner before the Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan within six weeks from today would be disposed of within further ten weeks. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)