1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3223 OF 2009 Sanjay S/o Bhausaheb Akhade Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mrs. S.S.Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D. R. Korde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard. The accused/ applicant in custody in Crime No.85 of 2009, since 17th August, 2009, seeks release on bail. 2. The nature of allegations against the accused/ applicant was, he being In-charge for the Water Development Scheme in the village, has facilitated sanction of Rs.33,65,700/- and an amount of Rs. 77,008/- is not rightly accounted for and it has been misappropriated. There is a boosting letter for the accused/ applicant prima facie issued by the Sub Divisional Engineer, In-charge of the scheme, dated 1st September, 2009 that the present applicant had 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. done his job in accordance with law and measurements were taken and the applicant had indeed informed the authorities to remove the deficiencies. The mistakes about feasibility of water resource as indicated in the official letter dated 5th September, 2008 prima facie will not implicate the accused with allegations of misappropriation, as it may amount to non-discharging the duty in proper tone. Considering these aspects, the accused/ applicant be released on his furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- [Rupees twenty thousand only]. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:23/09/2009. ans/3223