- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.117 OF 2005 NO.117 OF 2005 NO.117 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2005. : FEBRUARY 23, 2005. : FEBRUARY 23, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellants. The Appellants are the original Plaintiffs. The challenge in the suit in substance is to the legality and validity of the acquisition proceedings governed by the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In this view of the matter as held by the Apex Court a civil suit was not maintainable. 2. There is no error in the view taken by the courts below. The suit has been rightly dismissed. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. 3. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Second Appeal it will be open for the Appellants to adopt appropriate remedy for redressal of their grievances in accordance with law. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.