1 ca-1955-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srj CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1955 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.775 OF 2010 Shirinbai E. Mooman .. Applicant V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .. Respondent Mr. I.E.Mooman i/b. Ms. Sayyed Tabassum, for the Appellant Shri Vinod Mahadik, for Respondent CORAM:- B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED:- 25th AUGUST,2010. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. On perusal of the documents singed by Dy. Municipal Corporation North-I, it is recorded that Bombay Port Trust has allotted plot no.96-C (new plot no.21) and plot nos.96 & 97 (new plot no.19) to the Appellant for storage of Timber . In view of this documents, Appellant has a good prima facie case. The order of injunction was in operation during the pendency of the suit. 1 ca-1955-10.sxw 2 The learned counsel for the Respondent- Corporation opposes the application made by the Advocate for the Appellant on the ground that the construction of statement is unauthorized and, therefore, Applicant/appellant is not entitled for an order of injunction. 3 In that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant this application. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (B.R.GAVAI,J.)