IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 727 OF 2008 MR. GANESH S. KUBAL ... Petitioner Versus THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. Palekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. P. Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 9th June, 2009 P.C. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, states that the petitioner has been given posting at Panaji in Goa as per his request and hence, the grievance made in the present petition, has become infructuous. He further states that if the petitioner has got another grievance, the same may be allowed to be ventilated independently. 2. In the circumstances, we dispose of the petition as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to agitate his other grievance if such remedy is available to him in law. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA