{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8334 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4969 OF 2009 Munawar Ahmed Naeem Ahmed APPLICANT VERSUS The Principal Mohammad Ali Johar Women’s B.Ed. College and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.G.K.Thigale, Advocate for applicant Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. for State Mr.S.S.Deo,, Advocate for original petitioner Mr.A.S.Bays, Advocate for respondent No.4. ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 17th August 2009 PER COURT: 1. This is an application by which the applicant seeks to intervene in the writ petition. The applicant is neither a necessary nor proper party in respect of adjudication of the issues raised in the writ petition, therefore, the application is not maintainable and consequently dismissed. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed reliance on the judgment of Supreme Court in “Meera Massey V/s S.R.Mehrotra” reported in 1998 (3) SCC 88. The ratio {2} laid down in the said judgment is not applicable for deciding the maintainability of present civil application. The ratio, on which reliance is placed, deals with the maintainability of public interest litigation. 2. In the light of that, therefore, this application, which is sans merits, is dismissed with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca8334-09 {3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4969 OF 2009 The Principal Mohammad Ali Johar Women’s B.Ed. College and others PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.S.S.Deo,, Advocate for petitioner Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. for State Mr.A.S.Bays, Advocate for respondent No.4. ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 17th August 2009 PER COURT: 1. At the request of respondents, S.O. 25th August 2009 at a last chance. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca8334-09