IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2008 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35951 of 2008(E) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ THE W.M.O. ENGLISH SCHOOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI.M.A.MOHAMMED JAMAL, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.LATE SRI.ABDUL RAHIM, VELLAMUNDA P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT - 670 731 (RESIDING AT MANIKUNY HOUSE, P.O.SULTAN'S BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT). BY ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION (N) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHIKSHA KENDRA 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI - 110 092. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J.VARGHESE FOR R1 &R2 ADV.SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC, CBSE FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.35951/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by submitting application dated 10.10.2005 to the first respondent they have sought for a Non Objection certificate, in order to obtain the affiliation of the 3rd respondent for the school established by them. It is stated that the application has not been considered so far. There upon the petitioner states that they have filed Ext.P3, a representation before the first respondent, by way of a reminder and it is stated that even, then there is no response. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed praying that the first respondent be directed to pass orders on the application that has been filed. WP(c).No.35951/08 2 2. If as stated by the petitioner, they have filed an application dated 10.10.2005 and the same has been received by the first respondent, the first respondent should pass orders thereon. 3. Therefore, I direct that the first respondent shall consider the application dated 10.10.2005 and pass orders thereon, provided it has been received and is proper in all respects. An order shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. WP(c).No.35951/08 3