IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.3^3 ) OF 2005 PETmONER (S): ^ ^ -.-*.• .^"^ ^p ^ ^5?y ^yy .^../<v\T^6 i^y .^y 'y SECE^ .o-c;0^ ^^':TUR ^l^v "''I RESPONDENT (S): ^ 1. Jugut Ram Sahu, S/o- Shri Late Barat Ram Sahu, Aged About- 25 Years, R/o- Village-Manpasar, Thesil- Bilaigarh, Distt. -Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ku. Savita Jaisawal, D/o- Shri Raghunadan Jaisawal, Aged About- 19 Years, R/o- Village -Gatadhi, Thesil- Bilaigarh, Distt. -Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shiv Prasad Sahu, D/o- Shri Milaram Sahu, Aged About- 23 Years, R/o- Village -Bengpali, Thesil- Bilaigarh, Distt. -Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through it?s Secretary Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through it?s Secretary Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector Distt-Raipur (C.G.) 4. Sub Divisional Officer Thesil-Bilaigarh, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh Distt-Raipur (C.G.) 6. District Education Officer Distt-Raipur (C.G.) 7. Block Education Officer Block- Bilaigarh Distt-Raipur (C.G.) 4 nai ^^^1 ^ 8. 9. Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh Through It's-President Post- Bilaigarh Distt-Raipur (C.G.) Bloalc aeseiarces G@©rdi^ator Block- Bilaigarh Distt-Raipur (C.G.) A 10. Deputy Treasury Officer Block- Bilaigarh Distt-Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. L__- XI-HC-22 3an^T5RT {^TWW^T . rr--;^ ^' Xu.w^ ^ /f ^D 50 3^ ^Ni<n<<, ^xflwKo, (®tdi^^< 3ll^lM?|ch ..w..t-.J.^.\... mwTrsRww'""""""""" W[ w 9.8.2005 coiAisel Shri Vio.ay Paiidey, ' Shri G. K, Beriw41 State/ respoudents. I.A.No. 6661/2005 This is an. appUcation up on Board. This iiitermi appUcatio^ W,P._No,3531/,2005. Leamed counsel for fh.( were the candidates for the p| Panchayat, Bilaspur, They were not selected and a selecl pubUshed. The petitioners have c( aiid have also challenged tliei Adniittedly, tlie service| provisions of C.G, Paiichaj Conditions of Services) Rules| these niles. I ani not iaclid stage, However, if so a<| appropriate reBiedy provided With the above obs^ disposed. <t?i<<Id4l'i ^i*4<^ ^te^<Ri^« ^3T{^T3TI^T for the petitioners. Dy. Advocate Geueral for tlie for urgeut hearing, The matter is taken staads disposed of. ^ petitioners submits th.at the petitioners ^st of Shiksha Kanni Grade-III in. Jan.pad tiad appeared ia the iiiterview but they Ilst for appoiB.taient of 294 persous was h.allenged the vaMdity of said select Ust aoii-selection, $ of Shiksha Karmis are govemed by tlie rat Shiksha Kannis (ReciTiitment and 1997. There. is a provision of appeal iii ed to enteilaiii this writ petition at this [vised, the petitioners may avail the iinder the rules itsetf, ^ivatioiis, this petition staads finally Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge