IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2005 SHRI SHIV S.SIROHI, PANAJI GOA. ... Appellant Versus SMT.LILY COELHO AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the Principal Chief Engineer, P.W.D., Goa. Coram:- S.A.BOBDE, J. Date:- 26th April, 2007 P.C. Mr. Kantak, learned Counsel for the appellants states that the decree stands satisfied as the retention wall directed to be constructed therein has been constructed under the supervision of the Assistant Engineer, P.W.D. which is apparent from the report dated 20.3.2007. He submits that the appeal has become infructuous. 2. It is further directed that the amount deposited by the appellant and lying in the Court i.e. Rs.48,525/- shall be refunded to the appellant who has carried out the work at his own cost. S.A.BOBDE, J. ssm.