C22 63 Sngle Bench IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PET1T10N(S) NOS/W}? /2011. PETITIONER: ’éitaram Sidar, son of Late Anadi Sidar, aged about 61 years, working as Peon, Office of District Education Officer, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. VerSUS w Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Education Department, Dau Kalyan Singh, Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. . Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. /4. Uttam Das Mahant, Wogdng as Peon, Govt. Higher %eonadry School, Tetla, Pussour, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA i (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shfi Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, with Shri Harish Khuntiya, AdvoCates for ihe petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 02” day of August, 201 1) 1. The petitioner seeks to chaiienge the Iegaiity and validity of the order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure R1) passed the respondent No.3, whereby, the petitioner has been transferred from the Office of the District Education Officer. Raigarh to Govt. Higher Secondary SchooL Tetla. Pussour, District Raigarh on administrative grounds. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is at the fag end of his service career and he is going to retire within a period of eight months. therefore, the impugned order is illegal, arbitrary and against the transfer policy. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State respondents submits that in view of the fact. as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, if the petitioner is retiring within a period of eight months, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered, in accordance with the policy of the State Government, within a period of two weeks. 4. In view of that, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. till his representation is decided, in the event, the representation is filed within a period of three days. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of foregoing, nothing survives for adjudication in the matter at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/é Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR H v WRIT PETIT!ON (S) NO. 4229 OF 2011 PETITIONER Simram Sidar Versus RESPONDENTS sate of Chhattisgarh & Others