WPMS No.221/2006 Hon’ble B. C. Kandpal, J. By way of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 16.11.2005 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, in Case No. 150/2004, Smt. Neelam versus Himanshu Tyagi. Brief facts of the case are that respondent no. 2 filed a case under Section 125 (2) of Cr.P.C. before Principal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, against the petitioner. Objection was also filed by the petitioner in this case. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, vide order dated 16.11.2005, directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance of Rs.800/- every month to respondent no. 2. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid impugned order, the petitioner has preferred the petition before this Court. Heard Sri Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for petitioner, learned A.G.A. for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as after perusing the impugned order, I am of the view that impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity and the same does not require any interference by this Court. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. Stay order, if any, stands vacated. (B. C. K., J.) 30.04.2008 SP