IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2009 / 5TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21002 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.D.LEELAMOL, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O.T.BIJU KUMAR, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, PUTHANANGADI L.P.SCHOOL, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM WEST. 3. THE MANAGER, PUTHANANGADI L.P.SCHOOL, KOTTAYAM. 4. SMT.T.M.LEELAKUTTY, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ST.THOMAS G.H.SCHOOL, PUTHANANGADI, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY G.P. SHRI A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 21002 of 2009-U - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT By Ext.P5 order, the Manager terminated the petitioner pursuant to a one day verification, for the year 2009-2010. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed Ext.P6 before the Assistant Educational Officer. The petitioner has taken various grounds in Ext.P6. She is relying upon Exts.P2 and P3 Govt. Orders in support of her claim. 2. The main relief sought for is a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 within a time frame, in the light of the fact that the petitioner is terminated from service. 3. It is up to the second respondent to take a decision after hearing the parties. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/