IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.17304 of 1997 Between: Tandur Recreation Centre rep by its President, Tandur, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police R.R.District, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vikarabad, R.R.District. 3 The Inspector of Police Tandur, R.R.District. 4 The Sub-Inspector of Police Tandur, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, one in the nature of writ of mandamus 1) Declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the activities of the petitioner, by threatening to close down its activities, without issuing any order, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Art.14 and 19(1)(c) of the Constitution; 2) A Direction may be issued to the respondents not to interfere with the activities of the petitioner in any manner; 3) Costs be awarded to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the activities of the petitioner-Recreation Center and directing to close down its activities orally as illegal and arbitrary. When the matter is taken up today for hearing, none appears for the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that the respondents never visited the petitioner’s club as there is no information from anybody that some illegal activities are going on in it and as long as the petitioner’s club is functioning in legal means, there is no necessity for the respondents to interfere with its legal activities, therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 15.03.2005 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Superintendent of Police R.R.District, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vikarabad, R.R.District. 3 The Inspector of Police Tandur, R.R.District. 4 The Sub-Inspector of Police Tandur, R.R.District. 5 Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 6 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JCS}