THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.3464 of 2011 ORDER: Respondents 1 and 2 issued a notification, dated 30.03.2010, inviting applications for selection of persons, for allotment of Gas Agency, for several villages including Kallur Village, Pulicherla Mandal, Chittoor District. The petitioner, the 3rd respondent and certain others applied for the agency at Kallur Village. Respondents 1 and 2 selected the 3rd respondent. The petitioner submits that one of the important conditions in the tender notice is that an applicant must be resident of the village and though the 3rd respondent is not the resident of the village, she has been selected. The writ petition is filed challenging the selection of the 3rd respondent. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The principal ground on which the petitioner challenged the selection of the 3rd respondent is that the latter is not the resident of that village. The 1st respondent has constituted Grievance Redressal Committee to appraise the grievances in matters of this nature. The relevant clause directs that pending examination of the complaints, the further proceedings would be in abeyance. Even now the petitioner can avail the remedy. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Grievance Redressal Committee, within one week from today. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.15.02.2011. GJ