MC 1836/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN The petitioner has filed W.P(C) No. 4433 of 2010 alleging that 2(two) bills were issued covering the same period. This court by order dated 11-8-2010 while issu ing notice directed that the respondent shall not discontinue the electricity s upply to the premise of the petitioner without the leave of this court. The pet itioner submitted that the respondents are continuing with the electricity suppl y and that he wants to deposit the current bill with the ASEB authority. But in view of the pendency of the case, the respondent authority has refused to accept the amount sought to be deposited by the petitioner. Mr. Goswami, learned standing counsel, ASEB submits that the petitioner may make the necessary payment which will be accepted by the ASEB authority. In view of the aforesaid, this misc. case stands disposed of with the direction that the petitioner will regularly pay the current dues, which will be accepted by the ASEB authority. With the above direction, this misc. case stands disposed of.