IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal from Order No.240 of 2010 Smt. Sonal Kukreti …Appellant/Plaintiff Versus Shri Mayur Kukreti .…Respondent/Defendant Present : Sri Ramji Srivastava, Advocate present for appellant. Sri H.C. Joshi, Advocate present for the respondent. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sri Ramji Srivastava, Advocate present for appellant. Sri H.C. Joshi, Advocate present for the respondent. Heard. CLMA No.5779 of 2010 Delay condonation application No. 5779 of 2010 is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal against the order dated 16.04.2010 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Misc. Suit No.111 of 2008 is condoned. Heard also on admission. This appeal is directed against judgment and order passed by trial court whereby the application under section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, moved by the appellant has been rejected. 2 Perusal of the impugned judgment shows that the wife is employed with ICICI Bank and is earning member, and has sufficient means to maintain and support herself. We do not find any illegality in the impugned order. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed summarily. (Stay application No.5778/2010 as well as Urgency application No.3389 stand disposed of). (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) JKJ 30.08.2010