IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41163 of 2008 SUNIL YADAV & LAKHSHMAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.10.2008 Heard Sri Sucheta Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. In the background of litigation which is quite good in number the allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioners committed the abduction of Shyam Kumar for ransom. The said Shyam Kumar appears making statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and implicating the petitioner and others in the offence. The contention is that the informant bears a criminal history and is accused in many serious cases. Besides, the litigation is in between the informant and the petitioners and other accused persons of the case. The next contention is that the case has been initiated on the basis of a complaint petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. In the light of the above background, let the above named two petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in Mokama P.S.Case No.156 of 2006. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )