IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.M.P.(M).No.506/2010. Date of Decision: June 4, 2010 _______________________________________________________________ Sanjay Thakur & others …Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. ….Respondent. Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting1? No For the petitioner : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________ Dev Darshan Sud, J, Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Advocate General. It is submitted on behalf of the State that the petitioners were guilty of causing injury to the police personnel. 2. I am not going into the merits of the respective contentions of the parties. The submission is made on behalf of the petitioners that it is not known as to who set the effigies on fire. These were being carried by the petitioners in protest against the non-posting of doctors in hospital(s). As custodial interrogation is not required, this petition is allowed and the order dated 31.5.2010 is confirmed. A direction is Whether the reporters of local newspapers are allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2 issued that once the challan is filed in Court, the petitioner shall apply afresh for bail in the trial Court where challan is filed. 3. The petition is disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. June 4, 2009(HL)