IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.9693 of 2008 Between: Kalavakuru Gram Panchayat, Rep by its Sarpanch, Konidhela Venkateswara Reddy, Kalavakuru Village, Addanki Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary to Panchayat Raj and rural Development Dept., Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The district Panchayat Officer, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3 The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 4 Katari Sanjeev, S/o. Venkata Subba Rao, kalavakuru Village, Addanki Mandal, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action on the part of Respondents 1 to 3 on representation of Sarpanch dated 30.08.2006 for initiating action against the 4th Respondent for delivery of records and registers etc., belonged to petitioners Gram Panchayat as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the provisions of andhra pradesh panchayat Raj Act, 1994 the Rules framed there under and offends Articles 14 of Constituion of India and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to initiate necessary action against the 4th Repodents for delivery of balance records and registers belonged t Petitioners Gram Panchayat and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{LS} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.9693 of 2008 ORDER: The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner Gram Panchayat made a representation before respondents 1 to 3 for taking appropriate action against the 4th respondent for unauthorized delivery of records, registers etc. belong to the petitioner Gram Panchayat. The said representation has not been considered and disposed of. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to make a representation afresh before respondents 2 and 3 and if any such representation is filed and received, respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider and dispose of the same, in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 30.04.2009 Dsr .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary to Panchayat Raj and rural Development Dept., Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The district Panchayat Officer, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3 The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 4 2. 2CCs to 5. 2CD copies