IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42836 of 2008 SUJIT KUMAR … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri S.K.Yadav For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 18.11.2008 Heard. The petitioner was appointed as a Panchayat teacher by the Committee headed by the Mukhiya of the Panchyat and others. After appointment the certificates produced by the petitioner were sent for verification to the Bihar Intermediate Council, Patna, and it was reported that the same were forged. It is alleged that the petitioner being the close relative of the then Mukhia Kapildeo Prasad Yadav was appointed in spite of the documents being forged and fabricated. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 2.7.2008 and further considering that the Mukhiya has not been made an accused who could be the prime mover in the matter, let the petitioner, Sujit Kumar be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in Wazirganj P.S.Case No. 72 of 2008. It is surprised that the Mukhiya and others who were the prime movers in the matter are not being made accused. The Superintendent of Police, Gaya, is directed to reopen the investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and ensure by proper investigation that the real culprits who, it is well known, appointed the persons, like the petitioner, on extraneous consideration other than the merit, are arrayed as accused persons. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)