-^-- c^ r^i^ IN THEUIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH BILASPUR VVPJT PETITION (S) No. AS6^ 12006 i^'IA Petitioner x/^ ^"y.^1 ^\.--->^'' ../' ^"%/ ! •••' f/''\'°-:'~ /-'.^<c^'' ^/.,^'.^--' ^y.^ ^^'../ '^'^•"' Versus (>y Respondents :l hiv Kumar I T^-.- S/'o Late Ramjee Baretii, Aged about 38 years R/Q Mahmand, P.0, Lalkhadan Police station - Torwa Dist : Buaspur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh State Electricity^- Board, Through : The Secretary Daganiya Raipur (C.G.) 2, .0^ </ ^^ ^<^ Chief Engineer (Electricity).^ Korba, C.S.E.B. office Korba Dist : Korba(C.G.) Madhya Pradesh State^ Electricity Board, Through - The Secretary Shakti Bhavan Rainpur, Jabalpur (M.P.j 4. Union of India, / Through - The Secretaiy Ministry of Personal Public Grievances and Pension (State Re-organization Cell) 3rd Floor Lok Nayak Bhavan, Khan Market New DeUii. \. ( 2) WRIT PETITION (S) UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRJATE WRJT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORI ETC OR DIRECTION/ ORDER IN THE LIKENATURE , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNmOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.4867 OF 2006 •^ Petitioner Shiv Kumar Rajak versus Respondents Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board and others Present : Mr. C.R.Sahu, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pavan Shrivastava, Advocate appears on behalfof Mr. A.S.Gaharwar, counsel for respondents No.l & 2. Mr. S.K.Beriwal, counsel forrespondentNo.4. None appears for respondent No.3. ORDER (Passed on6th ofSeptember, 2006) Shri Ramjee Bareth, father ofthe petitioner, who was working as Paricharak Grade-I (Lineman), died in hamess on 30-8- 1999, while working in the ofGce ofrespondent No.2. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, fhe petitioner made an application dated 18-1-2000 (Annexure P-2) for grant of compassionate appointment. The eoncenied respondent has not decided Ihe application filed by the petitioner as yet. 2. This Court, by order dated 6-7-2(M6 in Writ Petition No.1459/2004, has held as under :- l< "It is the responsibUity of CSEB that even the employees who died before 15-11-2000, that is tiie date of coming into existence of CSEB, dependants of such employees are entitied for compassionate appointment on the ground that as per the decision ofUnion oflndiawhich has been refen-ed to inW-P.No. 1126/2003 (order dated 20- 6-2006), the division of employees shall be made territory-wise. Petitioner No.2's father was working in the temtory of CSEB, as such, petitioner No.2 is entitled &r consideratioa of appoiatment on compassionate ground. Even the State of Chhattisgarh, which came into exisitence on 1-11-2000 under tfie M.P. Reorganisation Act, 2000, has decided that the dependants of those employees who died on or after 1-11-1997 shall be eligible for consideration of appointment on compassionate ground." 3. As such, respondent No.l - Board is eompetent to decide the application of the petitioner already pending or any representation made hereinafter in accordance with law for grant of r compassionate appointment to fhe petitioner, to which leamed counsel appearing for respondents No.l, 2 and 4 have no objection. 4. The petition stands disposed of with the above-stated obseryation. The liberty is reserved to fhe petitioner to make a represenlation, if so advised, in continuation of his earlier application dated 18-1-2000 (Annexure P-2) to the concemed autfaorities within a period of two weeks. Oa sueh representation being made, respondents No.l and 2 are directed to consider the same witfain a period of six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. on its own merit. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per mles. Satisb^-.T1 judge ^: Gk>pal