IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-29643 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 20, 2011 Baljeet Kaur & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. I.P.S. Kohli, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent Nos.4, 5 and 7. Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.6. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The petitioners pray for protection of life and liberty in view of the fact that the petitioners got married which is not being accepted by respondent Nos.4 to 7. Crl. Misc. No. M-29643 of 2011 [2] 2. Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.6 i.e. brother of Baljeet Kaur (petitioner No.1). 3. This is an unfortunate case wherein the petitioners were engaged to each other on 2.9.2007 to get married. The marriage was scheduled for 26.11.2007. Petitioner No.2, Talveer Singh, however, met with an accident on 12.10.2007 and sustained injury in the back bone causing permanent physical disability. In such circumstances, possibly the family of the girl/ petitioner No.1, resisted the marriage. Be that as it may, the petitioners got married on 12.8.2011. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No.6 states that the marriage has now been accepted and the petitioners do not feel threatened by respondent Nos.4 to 7. 5. In view of the stand of the private respondent, the petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (AJAI LAMBA) October 20, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?