IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-1005 of 2010 Date of decision : 18.1.2010 Raj @ Raj Kumar …. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …. Respondent Present: Mr. Mahesh Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** S.S. SARON, J. Heard counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in a case registered against him for the offences under Sections 302/201/34/120-B IPC. The FIR in the case has been registered on the statement of Rajbir Singh father of the deceased Anil. On 5.8.2009, there was Kirtan and Langar at the house of the complainant. Many guests had come who had gathered at the house of the complainant. The complainant was busy in attending the guests till upto about 8.30 in the evening. At that time, Jassi son of Sish Ram, Sombir son of Raja, Monu son of Ram Kumar resident of Buchan Panna Balhamba came and took Anil, son of the complainant from his house on the pretext that they had some work in regard to their TVS motorcycle. At about 5.30 in the morning, Kuldeep son of Dariav Singh informed the Crl. Misc. No. M-1005 of 2010 [2] complainant that his son Anil was lying near Veterinary Hospital on the berm of Meham Beri road. One of his hands was tied with a shirt. The complainant reached the spot after getting news in this regard. Kuldeep son of Dharia, Raje son of Malha, Ranbir son of Fateh met the complainant near the dead body of Anil (son of the complainant). The dead body was examined and it was found that there were injuries on the forehead, on the left eye, on neck, chest, waist and legs which had been inflicted, on account of which he died. Injuries were also inflicted on the other parts of his body. The complainant asked the Control Room, Rohtak to inquire about the same and for taking legal action. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR and the story against him has been concocted. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, it is not in dispute that in the challan that has been filed, the name of the petitioner is also amongst the accused. He has been named on the statement of Surender son of Sh. Prem Chand. It is stated by aforesaid Surender that the petitioner had caught hold of the hands and legs of Anil (deceased) while others inflicted injuries. In the circumstances, no ground for pre-arrest bail is made out. Consequently, the Crl. Misc. petition is dismissed. (S.S. SARON) JUDGE January 18, 2010 amit