IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-26349 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.10.2009 Sikander Verma .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. S. Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. .. Rajesh Bindal J. While issuing notice of motion on 18.9.2009, this Court noticed the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was merely working as an employee in the clinic run by Dr. Ram Partap Gupta, who is having his clinic at that place only and not at any other place. It was only on account of the fact that at the time of visit of team headed by Senior Medical Officer, at 10.40 a.m. that Dr. Ram Partap Gupta, was not available in the clinic as he got late and his employees were there.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Gurtej Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the stand of learned counsel for the State, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 18.9.2009 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 30.10.2009 mk