Cgmék $ing§ae gesrmh RT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPIili ' ' ' ' gCHHATTISGARHl - WRIT PETITION (cm N0; 9 ‘é ' /2009 (slag PETITONER: @RDHA‘RAM, S/o. Late Jaldhar Jaiswalf :v.;_f‘ j 1" ‘ Aged about 65 years, R/o. VillageIV-Bharbhata, P.0’. Madhopali; ‘ Tahsil - 'Sarangarh, District—Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ,1. CHHATTISG‘ARH STATEHUMAN 'RIG‘HT'S COT/MISSION, through — ¥ SPONDENTS: ‘ RE Secretary, Near D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) . STATE OF CTIITATTTSGARHg, ThroughaSecretary, L " r’ ' D.K.S.‘ Bhawah, Mantralaya, Depamhent ofHOme,, aipur (C.G.) ‘ . THE SUPERINTENDENTOEPOLICE, Raigarh, r - J . VDisTrict—Raigarh (.CLG.) ‘ 4. R14. KESHARWANI,‘ Assistant Sub Inspector, , P.S — Sarangarh, at present pested as Sub inspector, P.S. ~ Saria, i: i.’ L1; ‘ » :' District—Raigarh (C.G.) ff- .V SHRI vs. CHAUBEY, p‘ Member &"Pres1ding‘0‘ff1cer Chhattisgarh State Human Rights Commission, Raipur (C.G.) BUTAL’U JAISWAL, '3 : S/o. Mohar Sai, agedéOyear’s, r ~ Kumharpara, ‘ ’ , R/p;a Village :Bharbnata',‘ at present R/o. rs. & Tahsir a Sarahgaxh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) ‘c\§ _ U M _ ‘ ' 3 ‘ § XVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 [227 CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ OF THE \éb HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CL) NO. 3146 of 2009 Sardha Ram. > Versus Chhattisgarh State Human Rights Commission & Others. (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.R.Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General with Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. for the State/respondents 2 & 3. Shri H.V.Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 29‘“ day of September, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the‘ petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner in this petition would be redressed, if the Chhattisgarh Human Rights Commission (for short ‘the Commissiom is directed to look into the complaint of the petitioner, (afresh. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that in light of the submission made in W.P.(Cr.) No. 4648/2009, by Shri Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General with Shri N.K.Aswal, Principal Secretary, Home, Government of Chhattisgarh that that two members have been appointed in the Commission, but the Chairman could not be appointed on account of non—availability of a retired Chief Justice and further all efforts would be taken to appoint the Chairman of the Commission as early as possible, preferably within period of six months, the Commission may be directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner.. s . Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. . ln view of the above, the Commission is requested to look into the complaint of the petitioner afresh and, take appropriate steps in accordance with law. ,5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. . Sd/- 3 - Satish K. Agnihotr Judge . a i