$-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 743/2010 & Crl.M.A. 17882/2010 (stay) SATYA PRAKASH CHAUHAN Petitioner Through Mr. B.S. Chauhan,Adv. versus MEENA DEVI Respondent Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State with SI AlokBajpaiPS S.P Badli CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 04.11.2011 By this petitionthe Petitionerhad challengedthe order dated 12^^ August, 2010 wherebythough the public prosecutorhad closedthe prosecutionevidence an applicationwas filed by the complainantunder Section 193 Cr.P.C. to take cognizanceagainst one Ms. Meena and her father. When the applicationwas takenup on 12^''August,2010 none appearedon behalfofthe complainantand the Learned Trial Court held that application under Section 193 Cr.P.C. was not maintainableas the applicationwas not evenendorsedby the prosecution. Learnedcounselfor the parties informthat the trial has concludedand the accused have been acquitted. In view of the fact that trial has concluded,the present petition has become infructuous. Petition and application are dismissed as infrcutous. 'ga' MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 04, 2011 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified