1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2918 OF 2011 (Omprakash Surajmal Sharma vs. The Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. AUGUST 08, 2011. Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 9 states that the respondents are not opposing expeditious disposal and he points out that there are no allegations that these respondents are not co-operating with Respondent No. 1 in the matter. Shri Sirpurkar, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 points out the earlier order dated 06.07.2011 passed by this Court while issuing notice. Shri Jaiswal, learned AGP for respondent No. 1 states that he is awaiting instructions from Respondent No. 1. As we find that the grievance is about continuation of old body since 1987, we permit the petitioner to move Respondent No. 1 for expeditious disposal. If such an application is moved by the petitioner and as the respondents are not opposing 2 the expeditious disposal, Respondent No. 1 shall grant matter the urgency it deserves and attempt to dispose of the same at the earliest. If the grievance of the petitioner is not resolved, liberty to the petitioner to approach again. With these directions, we dispose of the petition. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.