WP(C) 2196/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. B Buragohian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who was se ttled with the Moran Daily Market by the order dated 25.6.2008 passed by the Dib rugarh Zilla Parishad. The petitioner had made an application for remission of h is dues as a lessee of the said Daily Market under the provisions of Rule 49 of the Assam Panchayat Act (Financial) Rules, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ’the Rules’), Mr. Buragohian, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even b efore his application for remission has been considered, the settling Authoritie s have issued a fresh sale notice, inviting offers for settlement of the said ma rket for the Panchayat Year 2009-10. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Authorities may not be p ermitted to make settlement for the new session without considering his remissio n application. Mr. P Roy, learned Govt. Advocate representing the respondent Authorities submit s that consideration of remission is one issue and tender process for settlement for the new session is another and both cannot be mixed up together. In view of above, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this peti tion is disposed off directing the competent Authorities to consider the represe ntation dated 21.5.2009 (Annexure III) filed by the petitioner under the provisi ons of Rule 49 of the Rules. The application for remission would be considered on merit preferably within a p eriod of 4 weeks, after the petitioner furnishes a copy of this Court’s order al ong with a copy of this writ petition containing the above Annexure III represen tation. This writ petition stands disposed off accordingly.