IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24914 of 2010 CHATURBHUJ DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 6/ 27.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Rs. 5,00,000/- was handed over to Vidhyalaya Siksha Samiti for construction of rooms and office of school. Money was deposited in joint pass book of the informant and the petitioner mean to say that jointly they had power to withdraw. Informant is also represented by learned lawyer, Mr. Diwakar Upadhyay. It is admitted case of the parties that construction is not to the extent as money is withdrawn. Blame is against each other then also position remains the same that the total withdrawal amount is not utilized for construction of the building. Both the informant and petitioner are equally responsible for non-completion of the work. Husband of this petitioner is allowed bail since he was not directly involved in the case and also not alleged for withdrawal of money. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. It is for the Investigating Agency to look into the wrong committed by Head Mistress. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)