1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8771 OF 2010 Shri Rajendra Devidas Patil .. PETITIONER VERSUS Addl. Commissioner, Nashik & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. G.V. Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar, AGP for the State. Mr. S.S. Rajvaidya, advocate for respondent nos. 5 to 15. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8772 OF 2010 Shri Suresh Namdev More .. PETITIONER VERSUS Addl. Commissioner, Nashik & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. G.V. Wani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.N. Jadhav, AGP for the State. Mr. S.S. Rajvaidya, advocate for respondent nos. 5 to 15. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 28 th SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 2 1 Motion of ‘no confidence’ has been passed against the petitioners by majority of more than 2/3 rd members present in the meeting. ‘No confidence’ motion adopted by the Village Panchayat against the petitioners was subjected to challenge by the petitioners in appeals presented to the Additional Collector, Jalgaon. The appeals have been decided against the petitioners whereas further appeals presented to the Additional Commissioner have also been turned down. The only objection that has been canvassed is that no appropriate opportunity has been extended by the Additional Collector in favour of the petitioners to submit their contentions before the appellate authority. 2 I have perused the judgment delivered by the Additional Collector, Jalgaon as well as the appeal memo presented by the petitioners. It appears that all the objections raised by the petitioners have been considered by the Additional Collector and the petitioners had also availed further remedy of raising all the objections before the Additional Commissioner and, after considering those objections, the appeals tendered by the petitioners have been turned down by the Additional Commissioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitions do not call for any interference in exercise of extra ordinary 3 jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petitions are devoid of substance hence stand rejected. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8771.10.odt