IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M- 3594 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.03.2010. Ganga Ram and another. ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana. ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Gehlawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl..A.G., Haryana. *** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed by Ganga Ram and Smt.Prem for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.168 dated 13.10.2009 registered under Sections 306/498-A/34 IPC at P.S. Alewa, Jind. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been contended by learned senior counsel for the petitioners that they are old persons of 68 years and 63 years of age, respectively being parents-in-law of the deceased. It is further contended that petitioners alongwith their sons have been falsely implicated in this case. It CRM No.M-3594 of 2010 is further contended that death had taken place after about 10 years of marriage. It is further contended that petitioners used to live separate from their son and deceased and were having separate ration cards, Annexures P1 and P2. It is further contended that petitioners have been continuing in custody since 20.03.2009 and no witness has been examined so far and that hence, it will take long time for the trial to conclude. These facts have not been disputed by learned State counsel. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant bail application filed by Ganga Ram and Smt.Prem is accepted. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Jind. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) March 29, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2