IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1111 of 2008 Between: 1 Syed Mahamoodullah Hussaini, S/o.Syed Masood Hussaini O.U.College,Kurnool 2 M.Abdul Mujeeb, S/o.M.A.Vakil Osmania College,Kurnool 3 Mohd.Elias S/o.Abdul Sattar. Osmania College Kurnool 4 Syed Muzaffar Ahmed Hussaini S/o.Syed Masoos Hussaini, Osmania College Kurnool 5 S.Afzal Ahmed, S/o.Makbool Ahmed, Osmania College Kurnool 6 S.Abdul Kareem Basha, S/o.Late Abdul Hameed, Osmania College Kurnool 7 M.Hyder Ali Khan, S/o.Hussain Khan, Osmania College Kurnool ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P, Rep.by its Secretary Higher Education Secretariat, Buildings,Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner & Director,Collegiate Education, Hyderabad 3 Regional Joint Director, Collegiate Education Kadapa 4 The Correspondent, O.U College,Kurnool .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ,order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not passing formal recognization of the petitioners services, absorption of the petitoners in the sanctioned vacant posts included in Grant-in-Aid as per the recommendations made on 21-09-2002 29-10-2002,21-11- 2002&20-09-2004 which are in consonance with the staﬃng pattern ﬁxed by and sprit Article 14& 16 of the Constitution of India but also the Grant-in Aid scheme and the ration of the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court of India relating to the regularization absorption and the payment of regular scales of pay and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MRSYED SHAREEF AHMED Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1111 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled challenging the action of the respondents in not passing any orders in pursuance of the recommendations made by the 4th respondent-college through proceedings, dated 21.09.2002, and subsequent proceedings. It is now brought to the notice of this Court that the 2nd respondent passed orders, dated 29.02.2008, on the basis of the said recommendations and a writ petition is said to have been ﬁled, challenging the same. In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 01.08.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1111 of 2008 Date: 01.08.2008 JSU