iirw Q/S'hJz/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. F.A. No. g? 2004 /’ PLAINTIFF APPELLANT : / Gupta, Sirendra age Gupta 32 years, s/o Ramvriksha r/o Town Ambikapur, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, District mrguja, (LG. VERSU RESPONDENT DEFENDANT Silt. Geeta alpta w/o $1rendra Kumar Gipta, d/o Ramkishun @pta, age 28 years, Occupation-Teacher, r/o Near Maurya Kirana stares, H0use of Barahildas Forester, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, C. G. ?re$ent Address: c/o Girija Gupta Teacher, Behind Umadevi Rajwade (Parshad) Rihg Road, Pratappur Naka, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja,C.G APPEAL U/s. 28 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. S HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (LOK ADALAT) First Appea! No.87 of 200/! Appellant : Surendra Gupta Versus Respondent: Smt Geeta Gupta (Arisinq out ef Civil Suit No.2-A 0f 2W2 i 031'02/2037 Appelant - Surendra Gupta, with Shri AK Prasad, counsel for the appeilant. Shri Sushii Dubey, counsel for the respondent. Both the parties filed compromise petition and compromised the matter as beiow : "Both the parties have filedjoim‘ app/icafion In accordance with Section 13 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Acf bef0te the Family Court, Ambikapur; therefore, they have compromised to wiihdraw this appeal; accordingly this appea/ may be disposed of. " . _ ‘ . , ~ lh term of the above compromise, the appeai is dismissed. 1 , i i' However, it is eiucidateci that dismissal of this appeal in accordance with the above term of compromise shall hot create any bar in consideration; hearing and disposal of the application filed by the parties under Seeder/113 (B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, before the learned Family Court, " A ' l sai— .K" , p VSd/— z W , e M r ’ ' V — ‘evw’ “s \&.Q"] p Justice Vijay Kumar Shrivastava Member — Lok Adalat L High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhat‘n‘sgarh l Bilaspur Bilaspur padma