1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 909 OF 2003 with SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 910 OF 2003 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 909 OF 2003 in SUM. SUIT NO. 751 OF 2003 Gulab R. Shah .... Plaintiff. vs. M/s. Puma Telecom .... Defendants. Mr. C. J. Trivedi for plaintiff. Mr. P.S. Gidwani for defendants. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 910 OF 2003 in SUM. SUIT NO. 750 OF 2003 Gulab R. Shah .... Plaintiff. vs. M/s. Surasik Capital (India) Ltd., .... Defendants. 2 Mr. Sunil Vora i/by Sunil & Co. for plaintiff. Mr. P.S. Gidwani for defendants. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 16th August, 2005. P.C. . These two suits are based promissory notes. A perusal of the originals which are produced before makes a total different signatures on each of the said promissory notes. Over and above that the money was given in cash. In the aforesaid circumstances, there arise triable issues. Unconditional leave to defend the suit.