IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.351 of 2010 ARCHANA RANI WIFE OF LATE PASUPATI NATH SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MURAOWATPUR, P.S. DESRI, DISTRICT VAISHALI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, MUZUFFARPUR. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VAISHALI. 5. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, DESRI POLICE STATION, VAISHALI. ----------- 03. 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is to the effect that the Hajipur P.S. Case No. 226 of 2009 registered for the alleged offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code is not being properly investigated by the police. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein is to the effect that police after investigation submitted the final form as contained in Annexure- A to the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a protest petition has been filed by the informant in the court below which is pending for consideration. It is further submitted that on perusal of the statement made in paragraph -9 of the counter affidavit, it would appear that the police found the case true, however, for want of any clue final form was submitted. Considering the submissions of the parties, since the petition has been filed in this case, let the same be disposed of in accordance with law. However, it will be open for the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 4 who will look into the matter in accordance with law. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)