IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1394 of 2007 1. MAYANAND PRASAD RASTOGI S/O LATE RAMJI PRASAD RASTOGI 2. RAM MOHAN PD. RASTOGI S/O LATE GANESH LAL RASTOGI 3. BRAJ BIHARI RASTOGI @ BIHARI RASTOGI S/O LATE GANESH LAL RASTOGI. 4. JAGAT RASTOGI S/O RADHE LAL RASTOGI 5. DEEPAK RASTOGI S/O LATE BHARAT LAL RASTOGI 6. HARI MOHAN LAL RASTOGI S/O LATE GANESH LAL RASTOGI 7. ARUN KUMAR RASTOGI S/O LATE RAMESHWAR LAL RASTOGI 8. AKHILESH PD. RASTOGI S/O LATE RAMNATH RASTOGI 9. SUNIL KUMAR RASTOGI S/O LATE RAMNATH RASTOGI 10. VINAY RASTOGI S/O SATYANARAN PRASAD RASTOGI 11. NITYANAND RASTOGI S/O LATE DHARMDEO RASTOGI --- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR. --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 05 31.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been directed to execute bond(s) in terms of the provision of the Probation of Offenders Act. It is also submitted that pursuant to the order passed by learned lower appellate Court petitioners have already executed bond(s) periods whereof have already expired. In that view of the matter, the application seems to have become infructuous. Learned counsel at this stage highlights the provision contained under Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act which reads as under:- “12. Removal of disqualification attaching to conviction- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, a person found guilty of an offence and dealt with under the provisions of section 3 or section 4 shall not suffer disqualification, if any attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law:- Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to a person who, after his release under section, is subsequently sentenced for the original offence.” The application is accordingly disposed of. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)