IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 379 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1754/2007 Dated 10/08/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS 1 AND 3: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, CHARUMOODU BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER -RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 4: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.A.ISSAC,VEALIYIL, VETTICODE P.O., KATTANAM VILLAGE MAVELIKKARA TALUK 2. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ALAPPUZHA. 3. DAVID ABRAHAM VEALIYIL THEKKETHIL VETTICODE P.O., KATTANAM SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE PERUMPALLIKATTIYIL SRI.RENJITH KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY, Ag.CJ & K.T.SANKARAN, J. =========================== R.P.No.379 of 2008 in W.A.No.1754 of 2007 =============================== Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009. O R D E R Koshy, Ag.CJ. The contention of the petitioner is that the judgment is wrongly decided. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for re-hearing of the matter or as an appeal petition. No grounds are made out to review the judgment and accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. bkn/-