IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6345 of 2008 Date of decision: 26.2.2009 Anand Parkash ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Basanti and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Shakti Singh, Advocate for the respondents S.D.ANAND, J. Though there is no dispute with the fact that the impugned application for additional evidence came to be filed only in course of the hearing of the Ist Appeal, it also cannot be ignored from consideration that the documents proposed to be tendered into evidence thereby are Jamabandis and a copy of mutation, all of which are a part of the revenue record and would not require any formal proof. The view that in such an eventuality a plea for additional evidence ought to be allowed, is supported by a view taken by this Court in Ram Dass and another Vs. State of Haryana 2002 (1) PLJ 529 and Mehanga Singh Vs. Ralla Singh and others 2006 (1) PLJ 734. No law to the contrary was cited before this court. The petition shall stand allowed. The application for additional evidence shall stand allowed subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. February 26, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge