:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2000 REVISION APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2000 REVISION APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2000 Sau. Anita Rajesh Birajdar ...Applicant Vs. Rajesh G. Birajdar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.K.S.Patil i/by Prashant Badole for the Applicant. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7. Mr.R.Y.Mirza, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : JULY 15, 2005. : JULY 15, 2005. : JULY 15, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. The Revision Application is filed by the original complainant challenging order of acquittal of the Respondent-accused for offence punishable under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. The State has not preferred any Appeal against the acquittal and therefore, the scope of this Revision Application is very limited. 2. The submission made by the learned Counsel for the Applicant is that there are three letters written by the complainant to her father at Exhibit 34 to 36 which clearly establish the case of the offence punishable under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and important evidence in the form of said letters is not considered by the learned Trial Judge. Since the Record and Proceedings is received by this :2: Court, I have perused the said letters. The letter at Exhibit 36 does not bear any date. The letter at Exhibit 35 is dated 22nd May, 1995 and letter at Exhibit 34 also appears to be written in May, 1995. The date on the said letter is not readable. The postal stamps on the said letter show that all the letters appear to have been dispatched on the same day. It is thus obvious that the letters are posted on the same day though the same are purpotably written on different dates. The evidentiary value of the said letters in which the allegations are made by the complainant against the accused is very limited. Apart from these letters, the other evidence is considered by the learned Trial Judge and findings have been recorded after consideration of the evidence. No intereference is called for in the Revision Application and the same is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE