IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23756 of 2008 CHANDAN TANTI @ CHANDAN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.09.2008 The case is under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard. The informant alleged that the petitioner came to her house in morning at 5 A.M. and took her son Pankaj Kumar (deceased) with him and after some time she learnt that he (deceased) had been killed and then she went to the field of Sukhdev Tanti and found the dead body of the deceased who had been shot at and killed. The informant further stated that in past Diwali that there had been quarrel between deceased and the petitioner on the question of gambling, hence, the informant suspected that the petitioner killed the deceased. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.1.2008. Further submission is that besides suspicion there is nothing against the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Haque, the learned A.P.P does not point out any other material against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Chandan Tanti @ Chandan Kumar is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Deepak Kumar Sinha, Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Munger, in Sessions Trial No. 372 of 2008, arising out of East Colony P.S. Case No.3 of 2008. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-