1 Appln 5349-09 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5349 OF 2009 Shaikh Khalil Shaikh Usman ..Applicant V/s. Sumayya w/o. Shaikh Rizwan & anr...Respondents Mr.N.R.Bubna, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.A.M.Z.Ansari, Advocate, for Respondent No. 1 Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for Respondent No.2 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. . This is an Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail followed up by regular bail granted to Respondent No.1. The Respondent No.1 has been named by the victim as one of her tormentors. Victim was set on fire by her husband and it was victim s say that the Respondent, who was present at house along with other members of the family did not intervene or attempt to save her. 2. The learned Counsel for the Applicant is right in submitting that the Respondent 2 Appln 5349-09 should have disclosed the fact that the offence has been converted from the offence punishable under Section 307 to the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code when she applied for anticipatory bail. The learned Counsel for the Applicant was also right in submitting that the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Malegaon discloses absolutely no reasons which is decidedly undesirable. The learned Judge seems to have again simply passed an order accepted when the Respondent applied for regular bail which was also undesirable. The learned Judge may be appraised of the fact that it was not proper to pass such order without giving any reasons. 3. However since the application which was granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge shows that respondent was delivered of a child just a month before she applied and since there is nothing to show that she has 3 Appln 5349-09 abused her liberty. 4. Criminal Application is, therefore, rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)