CRP 298/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Sheikh, learned counsel or the petitioner as well as Mr. Choudhury, le arned counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioners who are the defendants in Title suit No. 84/2008 by the present petition have challenged the order dated 14.6.2011 passed by the learned Munsiff No. 1 rejecting the petition No. 578/2010 filed by the present petitioners seek ing stay further proceeding in the title suit, stating that the subject matter i n the former title suit filed by the petitioners as plaintiffs being Title Suit No. 26/2008 against the respondents as defendants, is the same as that of Title Suit No. 84/2008 and the parties are also same. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned court below has not considered the said aspect of the matter while passing the order dated 14.6.2011. The learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand submits that the subje ct matter of both the suits are different and hence no illegality has been commi tted by the learned court below in passing the order dated 14.6.2011. It appears that the subject matter in both the title suits is same and hence the re is no impediment in proceeding with the aforesaid two suits simultaneously. Hence the Munsiff No. 1 is directed to proceed with both the suits simultaneousl y. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Revision petition stands closed.