IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2002 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3089 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3089 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3089 OF 2001 Shri.Prakash Hari Ekhe .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.536 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.536 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.536 OF 2002 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3084 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3084 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3084 OF 2001 Shri.Jyotiba Ganpat Patil .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.537 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.537 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.537 OF 2002 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3085 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3085 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3085 OF 2001 Shri.Kantilal Janardan Pawar .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.538 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.538 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.538 OF 2002 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3087 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3087 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3087 OF 2001 Shri.Eknath Laxman Dhanavade .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.539 OF 2002 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.3083 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3083 OF 2001 PETITION NO.3083 OF 2001 Shri.Suresh Shamrao Jadhav .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents None for the Petitioners. Mr.R.D.Rane, Addl.G.P.for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.A.BOBDE, S.A.BOBDE, S.A.BOBDE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 27.10.2004. : 27.10.2004. : 27.10.2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears for the Petitioners. Mr.R.D.Rane, the learned Addl.Govt.Pleader has pointed out that the orders dated 27.2.2002 whereby the aforesaid Petitions were disposed of, were passed on merits and not on the ground of default. The present Civil Applications for restoration of the Petitions are therefore totally mis-conceived. Hence the aforesaid Civil Applications stand dismissed. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.A.BOBDE,J.) (S.A.BOBDE,J.) (S.A.BOBDE,J.)