IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 338 of 2006 (S/B) Rajesh Kumar and others .......... Petitioners Versus Smt. Anita Vinayak and others ............ Respondents Sri M.C.Pant, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri Arvind Vashistha, Asstt. Solicitor General for respondents 16 to 19. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri M.C.Pant, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri Arivind Vashistha, Asstt. Solicitor General for respondents 16, 17, 18 and 19. 2. Sri M.C.Pant, the learned counsel for the petitioners, in view of the fact that the Income Tax Department has filed a wit petition in the High Court of Allahabad against the impugned judgment dated 01.09.2006 passed by Allahabad Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of either seeking intervention in the said writ petition or filing a separate writ petition on behalf of the petitioners before the High Court of Allahabad. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Consequently, CLMA No. 14011 of 2006 also stands dismissed as withdrawn. ((J.C.S.Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 09.03.2007 09.03.2007 A