HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 4. 6. 7. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3361 of2007 T.N.Mishra Age about 48 year, U.T.D. S/o Shri Baburam Mishra Govt Boys High School, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Smt. Chaiidermai'u Kash^.'ap Age about 42 years, Astt. Teacher W/o Sfari Pharsuram Kashyap Pninary School Puujiguda, Bhond, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Pawan Gupta, Age about 38 year, U.T.D. S/o Late Shri N.K.Gupta, Govt. Boys High School, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Smt. Gumrit Thakur Age about 41 year, Astt. Teacher W/o Sliri Laxman Singh Tliakur Primary School Kumharpara, Retavand Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Devi Prasad Mishra Age about 52 years, U.T.D. S/o Slui Shiv Kumar Mislira Govl. Boys High School, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Shankar Rani Kashyap Age about 40 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Dharamu Ram Primary School Bodara, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Smt Rekha Kamini Age about 38 year, Astt. Teacher W,/o Sliri Pradeep Kumar Primary School Koichoor Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur(C.G.) Jeevrakhan Kosma Age about 42 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Sliri Sukha Raai Kosma Primary School Besoli, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Fotku Ram Baehel Age about 41 year, Astt. Teachei- S/o Shi-i Mosu Ram PrinMry School Jamkair, Block Baster, Distt. - Jagdalpur (C.G.) '^'ERSUS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Welfare Departiiient & Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Distt. Education Officer Jagdalpur District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal WeMare Departnient, Jagdalpur District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Principal Govt. Boys High School, District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Block Edueation Qfficer Bastar, District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) Treasui-y, Accoiuits. & Peiision Jagdalpur, District Jagdalpur (C.G.) 9. 4. o. WRIT PETITION LiNDER ARTICLE 226 OF rmE CONSTITmTON OF INDIA, Single Bench : Hpn'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotn. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advoeate tbr the petitioners. Sltri Y.S.Tiiakur, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. (Passed on 20al day of June, 2007) Learaed counsei appearing for the petrtioners as wel! as for the State/respondents jointly submit tb.a.t the fect and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the saroe to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Dur; nd another {2006 (II) MP.IR-CG 96}.- which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondents does not controvert the said submission, In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumcir Verma vs. The Staie Govf, of Chhattisgarh and (inother) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15- 12-2006, pursiiant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectiis of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training lastitute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed arsd renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision m Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Sumar Verma vs. The Stsste Govt. of Chhattwgarh and another) (Supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in tenn.s ofthe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Sup-a), subjectto verification of the fact as to whether the netitioners have acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per 1he circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as tc^costs^ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge