IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.218 of 2011 Parveen Kumar Vs. The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Sector-5, Panchkula & another Present: Mr.Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking mandamus for directing the respondents not to charge illegal amount from him and further not to harass and blackmail the petitioner. The petitioner is the one, who has taken loan from State Bank of India and there is some dispute in regard to some entries, which are reflected in his statement of accounts. As per the petitioner, some entries are being shown illegally. I am afraid, the writ is not an appropriate remedy, which the petitioner has chosen to file. No legal or other rights of the petitioner are being violated, which could be corrected by issuing any appropriate writs, which are available under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is raising a disputed question in regard to the payment, which he has made or his liability in regard to interest or any other such amount, which cannot be gone into in exercise of writ jurisdiction. This writ petition is wholly misconceived and is dismissed. At this stage, counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, which is also declined. January 06, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE