1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.188/2008 (Hakim Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 28, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Dhirendra Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as the challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that almost all the witnesses have stated that the deceased committed suicide in anger as she was asked to pour the water in the foundation of house of the petitioner and on refusal, it is alleged that petitioner gave 2-3 slaps to her. Except this, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no evidence of abetment to commit suicide. I have carefully gone through the statements of the witnesses more particularly the statement of Bhera Ram, who is said to be a witness prior to the occurrence. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case 2 and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Hakim Khan s/o Haneef Khan be released on bail in FIR No.259/2007, P.S. Bhinmal, Distt. Jalore provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-