1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.4 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5040 OF 2005 Rashtriya Shikshan Sangh & Ans. ...Petitioners. Vs. Rajmati Sadashiv Mali & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Petitioners. Mr. Machhindra Patil for Respondent No.1. Ms. P.S. Cartoza, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Mr. A.S. Khavekar i/b. Mr. G.M. Savagave for Respondent No.6. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.H. BHATIA, JJ. November 24, 2008. P.C. In paragraph 2 of the judgment of this Court dated 8th March 2006, it has been observed that the Original Petitioners had fairly not disputed the factual position that the First Respondent was a duly qualified teacher. It has been observed that the services of the First Respondent were arbitrarily terminated without cause or justification and without any enquiry. In fact, a concession has been recorded by this Court of Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners that the 2 termination was illegal. In view of the concession made before the Court on instructions, no ground for review has been made out. The Review Petition shall accordingly stand dismissed. ( Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) ( J. H. Bhatia, J.)