1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4300 OF 200 PETITION NO. 4300 OF 200 PETITION NO. 4300 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office ) Memoranda of Coram, ) appearances, Court’s ) Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions ) and Registrar’s orders.) ------------------------------------------------------------ Ms. Lalita Panchakshari for Petitioner. Mr. A.P. Vanarse, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 23, 2005 P.C. . The order declaring the land surplus was not challenged by the owner, but the appeal, was prefered by the Housing Society which claim that there is an agreement with the owner. An agreement would confer no right as no interests in the property was transferred. Considering that we do not find that the order of the appellate authority suffers from any error r apparent on the face of record. If the Petitioner succeeds in the suit, it will be open to the Petitioner to take such steps in law which he may be entitled to. With above observations, Petition disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P.KUKDAY,J.)