IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 43 OF 2010 Shrikant Akaram Lad and others. ... Petitioners Versus Maharashtra State Co­op. Bank Ltd. and others. ... Respondents Mr.A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amol Gatne i/by Mr. Umesh Mankapure for petitioners. Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni i/by Mr. A.M. Kulkarni for respondent No.4. Mr. R.M. Kadam, Advocate General with Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.5. Mr. Bhushan Walimbe for respondent No.1. Mr. Dinesh Kadam for respondent No.2. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C. J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C. Preliminary objection has been taken by the learned Advocate General and other advocates appearing for the respondents that this PIL is not maintainable in the instant case. Moreover, it is submitted that it is open to the petitioners to file an appeal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 2. In view of the aforesaid objection raised on behalf of the respondents, the learned advocate Shri Anturkar has fairly submitted that he would like to withdraw the PIL so as to avail the appropriate remedy by filing an appeal under Section 17 of the aforestated Act. We are sure that the appeal, if filed, shall be heard and disposed of by the Tribunal at an early date. The learned advocate has also submitted that the petitioners would also like to file a separate petition so far as prayer 16(e) is concerned. 3. Permission for withdrawal of the PIL is granted. PIL stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.