IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1231 of 1991 NAND LAL CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE & ORS ----------- CWJC No.1237 of 1991 NAND LAL CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- CWJC No.1238 of 1991 NAND LAL CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- CWJC No.1383 of 1991 NIRANJAN KUMAE CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- CWJC No.1618 of 1991 NANDLAL CHOUDHARY Versus STATE & OTHERS ----------- CWJC No.975 of 1991 SHIV KUMAR CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE & ORS. ----------- CWJC No.7128 of 1990 SMT. RENU DEVI Versus STATE ----------- CWJC No.7121 of 1990 SMT. RENU DEVI Versus STATE ----------- CWJC No.7126 of 1990 SMT.RENU DEVI Versus STATE ----------- 6. 8.10.2009 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the parties. After hearing lengthy arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners State and the private respondents it has emerged that the proceedings in all these cases under Section 456 of Bihar Tenancy Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act is still at the embryo stage before the Collector under the Act. This Court in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as against orders constituting Bataidari Board would be loath to interfere as was held way back by the Special Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Rasiklal Singh & ors. vs. State of Bihar & ors., reported in AIR 1979 Patna 172. That being so, this Court would dispose of all these cases with a liberty to all the parties to raise all the questions before the appropriate forum/authorities in terms of Section 48E and 49M of the Act. With the aforesaid observations all these applications are accordingly disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)