s:ffl, •a>t ..:^.. --_s&^.-.._-.-^-._- ^ ^^fSas^ XI-HC-78 C^giT' -'''.''. 'c yy *ll*iwi ^TT^ ^T"T ^ioiw«,t»tTI'(i<i<»,R)rii^iy'< d^ • u • ^200 3Ilt?I!RlR'fi* aaiT3ii^r**ii<b an^ST <raq»(^?f^p5) B^ITiR^lfer 311^91 w.t*. (St N0^688 of PBTITIONER RESPONDBNTS Versus 1. 2. 3. S.B Hon'ble^hri Dhirdndra Mlshra. J. Tripapii 1.12.2008 Mr. Rajendra Ms. Sunita Jain, Heard. Grievance of fhe from Hindi Sdhitya course in fhe year 2003.| P-1. The coyrse is Dtrectorate of appeared in the examin|ai futfllls quaBflcations for| Goveinnlient <oi<<TCT<i1'i *iiinl"iffe'<9 '(Rf't^l'i ^si^iTsn^?! Kheer Sa^ax Dansena, S/o Late Shri Shripati Dansena, aged about 38 years, R/o ViSage Lobhta, Post Boda, Tahsit Sariya, District Raigarh (CG) State of ClLhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Department of Panchayat & Social Welfare, D.K.S. BuUdmg, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhatdsgarh) Director (Panchayat), Chhatdsgarh, Raipur (CG) |CoUector, Raigarh (CG) Writ Petttion under Aj-ticle 226 ofthe Constitutioa oflndia i, counsel for fhe petitioner. Lawyer for the State. Pdnel pletitioner is that he is Shiksha Visharad Sci^nmelctn, Allahabad. He did the above 1 He has filed his mark sheet of Annexure djiily recognized by the Central Hindi of India vide Annexure P-2. He linlation for Shiksha Karmi Grade-II as he |the said post. After fhe examination, he XI-HC-78 TPTc5T^ITT^ g'orT -«l«in«, t»Ti1'M<l<?, Iqrtl'Hyt .c.tv.?;.f-^..M^.y.s^. ^200 sn^CTwR-ii* ?iaiT3iK»Ta>*ii<p 3IT^?T qaq»(^ijd.d) g^iTW^ifeT3ir^?r z.- Oltl eli^bi|lity Kanlii was caUed for counseling. candidature was not consid' Shiksha Karmi Grade-II Shsksha Vishcirad is not to be eUgibIe for the appoin^ From the avennentj eligibUity for appomtment B.Ed. is necessary, thoul document regarding the post of Shiksha document along with this Vishrad is considered to U Chhattisgarh. The relied upon by the petition{ dated 27th July 2001 is4 Resources of the Govermn^ the codrse of Shiksha Visl fhree years. Since, fhe petitioner| that he fuIfiUs fhe eUgibilit| of Shiksha Karmi Grade-1 petitioner, as claimed. Accordingly, fhe itself. <t>n *l^fd41'1 «11*friT^"ls'<3'(luit^K iliari^qsn^T powever, at fhe time of counselmg, his (ered for therecruitment on fhe post of the ground that the qualiflcation of e<[uivalent to B.Ed., which is necessary poinfiaent on fhe post of Shlksha Karmi, ^ in the petition, it appears that the post of Shilcsha Kanni, passm^ ;h fhe petitioner has not filed any criteria fixed for appointment on Kanfii. The petitioner has not ffled any betition to establish that the Shiksha equivalent to B.Ed. in the State of •umelnt of Annexure P-2 dated 12.4.2003 ;r oilly shows that by the noti&cation ^ued by tlie Department of Human ^nt of India, temporary recognition to barad has been fiirther extended for |has not ffled any document to show cnteria for appoiatment on £he post P, no reBef can be granted to the petit(on dismissed at the admission stage •a Judge