MC 1256/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the applicant/ respondent No. 5. Also heard Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the Opp. Party/ writ petitioner . It is submitted by Mr. Sheikh learned counsel for the applicant that the interim order passed on 18.3.2011 is non-est in the eye of law inasmuch as the writ pe tition was filed by 4 petitioner by giving power to only one petitioner. The wri t petition should not have been entertained not to speak of passing any interim order. I have considered the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the appli cant. I have also verified from the record and found that only one petitioner n amely Md. Ayub Ali Sk signed the Vokalatnama. The aforesaid fact was not brought to the notice of the Court by the Registry nor by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. There may not be malafide intention on the part of the counsel for the writ petitioner but it is improper to pass any interim order on the basi s of such defective writ petition. In view of the above, there is no other alternative but to vacate the same. Acco rdingly the order dated 18.3.2011 stands vacated. This writ petition stands allo wed. The opp. Party/ writ petitioner is given liberty to cure the defects in the writ petition. Misc. case stands disposed of.