IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2011 / 28TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 24690 of 2011(I) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ANILKUMAR D., AJAYA MANDIRAM, AMBALTHUMBHAGOM P.O., PORUVAZHY, KOLLAM-690520, (FORMERLY WATCHER-CUM-PEON, TECHNICAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MALLAPPALLY EAST P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA). BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, (IHRD) REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY SRI.V.A. MUHAMMED, SC, IHRD. SRI.M.A. FAYAZ, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.24690/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3-8-2011. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13-7-2007 IN 13-7-2007 IN WPC 2135/2007. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27-5-2008 IN COC 1662/2007. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15-3-2011 IN WA 1616/2010. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17-6-2011. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10-7-2011 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.24690 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of October, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance herein is that in spite of a representation submitted by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent has not considered the claim of the petitioner for engagement on provisional basis and on a consolidated pay as done by way of Ext.P5. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that the service particulars of the petitioner in paragraph 2 of the writ petition will show that it is less than five years. 3. The petitioner is relying upon Ext.P4 judgment of a Division Bench of this Court wherein the parties had put in service of five years or more as on 14.11.2006. It is upto the 2nd respondent to give a suitable reply to the petitioner. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to furnish a W.P.(C) No.24690/2011 2 suitable reply to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp