1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2219/2010 Khushalrao B. Mahajan Vs. Dy. Charity Commissioner and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. P. R. Wagh, Adv. h/f Advocate A. N. Shedame for the petitioner. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30TH AUGUST, 2010. Advocate P.R. Wagh inform that Advocate Shedame is unwell. Mr. Abhyankar, learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 4 has pointed out that proceeding in present writ petition have become infructuous. According to him, one of the applications moved by the petitioner has been rejected by Deputy Charity Commissioner and that order needs to be challenged. Mr. Kankale, learned AGP appears for respondent no.1. It is apparent that in the present writ petition there is no challenge to any particular order passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner. Hence, the petitioner is given liberty to file suitable application before the Deputy Charity Commissioner or then if any order is passed by the Deputy Charity 2 Commissioner to assail that order before appropriate forum in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Ambulkar.