WP(C) 5514/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA.. The grievance of the petitioner, who is the wife of Kutub Uddin Mazumdar, is in relation to pensionary benefits to which the petitioner claims, she is entitled to on account of services rendered by her husband under the respondents. The hus band of the petitioner was appointed as Muster Roll Worker under the respondents in the year 1987. His service was regularized by Annexure-’C’ order dated 30.3. 2005. He died on 6.10.2006. The respondents in their counter affidavit have stated while admitting the afore said facts that there is no clear Government decision regarding admissibility of the family pension in respect of the employees like that of the petitioner, who had been brought under the regular establishment. However, the Government of As sam has reviewed the particular matter referred to in the affidavit-in-oppositio n. It was observed that the case of the Muster Roll Workers will be taken into c onsideration after deducting the initial 6 (six) years Muster Roll service for t he purpose of pension/family pension/DCRG etc. It has also been stated that the pension case of the petitioner is at the final stage and expected to be submitte d to the Accountant General, Assam shortly. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of providing that the respo ndents shall take appropriate decision in the matter as expeditiously as possibl e, preferably within 31st March,2011.