IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19279 of 2011 Munni Devi W/o Raj Kumar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 05.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, petitioner administered poison to deceased who was non else than own father-in-law of the petitioner. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is second wife of her husband and as a matter of fact the relation of the petitioner with infirmant and her husband was strained and the informant is first wife of her husband. It is pointed by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the year 2008, the petitioner filed a complaint case against her husband and other family members but due to intervention and persuasion by her father-in-law she again went to her in- laws house but her husband as well as informant of the case again terminated her from her in- laws house and after that she filed complaint case bearing Complaint Case No. 863 of 2010 and that is the reason of her false implication in 2 the present case. Admittedly, none has seen the petitioner giving poison to the deceased though in postmortem examination, the cause of death is said to be suspect case of poisoning. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case as well as the submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 72 of 2010. Safik (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)