IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17598 of 2011 Shri Surendra Nath Sahay Versus The Union Of India & Ors 2 30-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the office note raising objection in respect of maintainability of this writ petition on the ground that impugned order has been passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench. Although learned counsel for the petitioner tried to justify the decision of the petitioner to approach this court on account of practical difficulties and convenience, we are not persuaded to overrule the objection of office. In our considered view, the judgement of Guwahati Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal should be challenged before the High Court having jurisdiction over that Bench. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed on account of lack of jurisdiction in this court. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that, if so advised, he may approach the appropriate court or Tribunal for seeking relief in accordance with law. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)