1 caw597-11 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLILCATION NO.597 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5641 OF 2000 Shaikh Salahuddin Shaukatiali .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.M.Joshi for the applicant Ms.Sneha P. Bhide, B Panel Advocate for the State ‘ ’ CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 25th MARCH, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This application is preferred by original petitioner for substituted service on respondent no.4. 3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the averments made in Civil application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) which reads as under: (b) the Hon ble court be pleased to direct that respondent no.4 “ ’ 2 caw597-11 be served by substituted service as per Order­5, Rule­20 of the Civil Procedure Code.” 4. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K. TATED, J.)