IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO :10669 of 1999 Between: M. A. Kaleem S/o Shaik Nana Sahab R/o Bapatla, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., Rep. by its Secretary for Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Collegiate Education A.P., Hyderabad. 3 Bapattla College of Arts and Science, Bapattla, Guntur District. 4 K. Rama Rao L.D.C., Bapatla College of Arts & Science Bapatla, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in rejecting to approve the promotion of the Petitioner as Senior Assistant in the 3rd Respondent to consider case of the 4th Respondent for promotion as senior Assistant vide impugned proceedings Rc. No. 375/PC.IV-2/98 dt. 13/5/1999 as illegal arbitrary discriminatory high handed and cannot be justified in the eye of law and consequently declare that the petitioner is fully eligible and qualified for promotion and entitled in the promotion to the post of Senior Assistant in the 3rd Respondent college w.e.f., 3/8/1998 i.e., the D.P.C. held and directed the 2nd Respondent to approve the same in the light of G.O. Ms. No. 165 CAD (Senc) Department dated 22/4/1997 and the Judgement of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 26310 of 1998 dt. 23/10/1998 reported in 1998 (6) ALD Page No. 491 by quashing Impugned Proceedings Rc. No. 375/PC.OV-2/98 dt. 13/5/1999 issued by the 2nd Respondent in the interest of Justice and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 29.06.1999 in W.P.M.P.Nos.13104 and 13105 of 1999, the petitioner was promoted and thereafter he retired on attaining superannuation, and in view of the same, no orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. __________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Date: 04.06.2009. CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No. 10669 of 1999 (Closed) Date:04.06.2009 CBS