/ IS £xis ilUri 2)U2 01 TLeaA A sikinii sna 9±iN jiAY 0i &iUnrLY 1298 dSk0 iLls LME HUN t ikE M. JUaflOL A 6 niOK allAN 2fth1L2tJ.ZIZA .1sN: Sri. Mallappa S/o Sri. Ramaiah, Major, No,L-ll4/6, 13th Cross Laxminarayanapure n, BangaIcre560 021, 4 ,Petitloner, (By sri. R.B,Sakshivappa, AU?,) Aie in rj, Anjanaopa Reddy, /o Sri. Hanurna’ithapa Ra&Iy, Major, it/o Kyalasanahalil ?illage, i(,zt. Pura, Moth, Bangt lore ou h Lalulc, . . heap )fldnt. Sri, H,d, Anantha Krtshnamurthy, Ad?.) ivil Revtsion Pe$tioa Is tiled Unaer Sotion1l5of C.?,C. against the order dted r,8,l997 passed i. M. lo,23 of 997 on tne fIle of the lInd d1, Civil Juage, (r.un.) Bangalore .rtural istflet,hangaiore, allowing the sppeil aa setting ate the ouler pactd i 0.’ t,l53 of 1fl6 lt.5.2.1927 y the Princpa1 lind Muasiff, Banalore, - 2 his Civ±l Aev±son Petition coming on for Admission this day, the Court made the foliowing: Plaintiff-petitIoner has filed this revi sion peti tion. Plaintiff-petitioner filed suit for prohibitory injunction against the deferAdant—respon’Ient restraining him from interfering with the peacefisl possession and enjoynt of the suit land. in apploaton under Order 39 le I for temporary i ijunction Was also filed, friel Court çted the injunction. In acpeal the order of the trial Court has been set Counsel far the parties are agreed that this petition be disposed of by passing ar orner that status-quo between the parties be mainainnd during the pendency of the suit before the trial Court. In viewol wna hasbeen stated byhe counsel for the parties the orcer of the Courts below is aodified ani the parties are are directed to maintain status-4 quo regarding possession during the pendency of the suit, Petiion disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd!— 1 jtJiJca, T,by: Mi, d,bys £ C,by: 4...