: 1 : vss THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2008 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.310 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.A.M. Kulkarni for Petitioner Mr.Nitin Jamdar for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.I. Patel, AGP, for STate Mr.A.B. Tajane for Applicant CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. DATED: FEBRUARY 3, 2010 P.C.: The present civil application has been taken out by the applicant contending that it be permitted to intervene in a contempt petition. In my view, the application is thoroughly misconceived. A contempt petition is filed when the petitioner is of the view that certain orders passed by the Court have been breached by those who he mentions in the petition as respondent/contemnors. No allegation whatsoever has been made by the petitioner against the applicant in the contempt : 2 : petition. In these circumstances, the intervention application is dismissed. 2. This order does not in any way reflect on the right, if any, that the applicant may have with respect to the order passed in Writ Petition No.2753 of 2009. : 3 : vss THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.310 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's order or Directions and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr.A.M. Kulkarni for Petitioner Mr.Nitin Jamdar for Respondent No.1 Mr.A.I. Patel, AGP, for STate Mr.A.B. Tajane for Applicant CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. DATED: FEBRUARY 3, 2010 P.C.: The learned AGP seeks an adjournment to file a reply. 2. S.O. to 5.3.2010.