IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20066 of 2011 Eershad Alam @ Md. Eershad Aalam Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv. For the Complainant :- Mr. Arjun Prasad No. 1, Adv. For the State :- Mr. Manish Kumar – 2, A.P.P. ---------- 02/- 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant who appeared suo motu by filing power, whose name also appears in daily cause list. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant, carries allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. It appears that within a short span of marriage, the couple dragged into litigation more than once. However, it is submitted that the couple still intends to continue their marital life. Taking into consideration, subject to filing of an application before the court below stating such intention with an offer to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- (five hundred only) per month by way of ad interim maintenance to the complainant and subject to any order on the point by the competent court, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks, let the petitioner, namely, Eershad Alam @ Md. Eershad Aalam, be enlarge on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or 2 till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation or even single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)