IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 13543 of 2011 Date of decision October 18, 2011 M/s Hanuman Rice Traders ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. R. S. Modi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Hari Pal Verma, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Counsel for the State produces before the Court a copy of the communication said to have been issued to the petitioner making the allotment subject to certain conditions. Having regard to the same, counsel for the petitioner, on instructions states that he does not propose to prosecute the writ petition and the same be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 2. As ordered. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 18, 2011 archana