IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.195 of 2007 BHARAT CHOUDHARY Versus HIRA MATI DEVI ----------- 2 18.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. If the petitioner may have luxury of keeping two wives as has been recorded by the Court below in the impugned order, this Court would not find any reason to interfere in the amount of Rs. 1,000/- per month granted by the Court below by way of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This Court also approves the reasoning of the Court below which has gone into the issue of defence raised by the petitioner that he had already given one bigha of land to the opposite party, wife for maintaining herself in the year 1995 and its finding that actually the said land was never given to her rather a will has been made in which it was stated that after the petitioner dies, the opposite party, wife may have a right over one bigha of land does not suffer from any error. That being so, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order as the marriage of the opposite party is an admitted fact and as such the petitioner cannot deny his liability to maintain her only on the ground of a will executed by the petitioner. Accordingly, this civil revision application, being devoid of any merit, is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)