IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11665 of 2008 ANIL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.05.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the State and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Complainant. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A of the Penal Code. While Counsel for the complainant reiterates her willingness to go back to the matrimonial home the prayer on behalf of the petitioner is for grant of anticipatory bail and his disinterest in the same on the ground that there are no serious allegation against him. This Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit in the light of the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)