IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32519 of 2010 DASHRATH CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It is prayed that 120 litres of illicit liquor and 500 Kgs. molasses were recovered from the house of the petitioner. Defence of the petitioner is that admittedly, the said recovery was made from joint house and, moreover, the occurrence took place on 29.08.2009 but the prosecution report was submitted on 01.01.2010 i.e. after much delay. He further submitted that petitioner is an Ayurvedic practitioner and he has been falsely implicated but I am not, at all, convinced with the above stated submissions. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition stands rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and seek regular bail within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Case No. 01 C 3 EX/2010 and if 2 petitioner so surrenders within above stated stipulated period, the learned court below shall consider its regular bail application on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order, particularly, keeping in mind that there is difference between the provisions of anticipatory bail and regular bail and furthermore, learned court below shall dispose of the regular bail application of the petitioner, if possible, on the same day. Shahid/Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)