AB 3219/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. The petitioners, namely, Smt. Rameswari Borah, Sri Khagen Saikia and Smt . Janmani Borah, are seeking the privilege of pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. apprehending arrest in connection with Teok P.S. Case No.234/2011 regist ered under Section 394 IPC corresponding to G.R. Case No.1422/2011. I have perused the case diary as produced by the learned P.P. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the materials available in the case diary, I am of the view that the privilege of p re-arrest bail is to be granted to the petitioners, namely, Smt. Rameswari Borah , Sri Khagen Saikia and Smt. Janmani Borah, and hence the order of interim bail passed on 30.09.2011 is made absolute, however, with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a p olice officer as and when required; (ii) They shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or pr omise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police offi cer; (iii) They shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned Chief Judicial Magi strate, Jorhat without the written permission of that Court. The bail application is accordingly disposed of.