IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12483 of 2008 SATYA NARAIN PANDEY, SON OF LATE UPENDRA NARAIN PANDEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIROJGADH, TOLA RAM NAGAR, P.S. GOGHARDIHA, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE LAND REFORM COMMISSIONER, SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE COLLECTOR, PURNEA. 3. THE COLLECTOR, KISHANGANJ. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, PURNEA. 5. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, KISHANGANJ. 6. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, POTHIA, DISTRICT KISHANGANJ ----------- 2. 21.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent – State. A rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as claim with regard to grant of Assured Career Progression (ACP) is concerned, petitioner shall pursue departmentally. As regards, the grievance of non-payment of provident dues is concerned, it is submitted that the respondent nos. 2 and 4 deserve to be suitably directed. Learned counsel for the respondent State submits that in case petitioner files representation, 2 the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 stating details of his claims with regard to provident dues, enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of his claim alongwith certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the above respondent shall consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admitted claims of the petitioner could be paid with statutory interest without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)