IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1049 of 2011 Gango Mahto @ Pankaj Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ------------ 02 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This is repeat application filed on behalf of the petitioner who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law. Earlier his prayer for bail was considered and rejected by order dated 23.02.2011 (Annexure- 1). It appears therefrom that considering his criminal background this Court had declined to release him on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that another co- accused, namely Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar, who is similarly placed, moved this Court in Cr. Rev. no. 1763 of 2010, and by order dated 05.07.2011 (Annexure-3), this Court, noticing the criminal background of the petitioner, directed for his release on bail. Learned counsel submits that aforesaid co-accused Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar was similarly lodged in the custody/remand home along with the petitioner on 09.01.2010. It is next contended that the father of the petitioner shall take upon himself entire responsibility respecting the petitioner if released on bail including his production in Court as and when required. On going through the order dated 05.07.2011 (Annexure-3), this Court finds that the petitioner therein was directed to be released even after noticing the fact that he carried criminal antecedent. Having heard the parties and after perusal of the materials on record including the order contained in Annexure-3, this Court is 2 inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. Let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. case no. 77 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the father to monitor conduct of the petitioner and to produce him before the Court as and when required for his physical appearance. In case of default in compliance thereof, learned Court below shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. (iii) During the subsistency of the present privilege, if it is found that petitioner has indulged himself in another criminal case, the same shall be treated as breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)