THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2531 OF 2011 Dated:11.08.2011 Between: Girijala Venkayya and another .. Petitioners And Sri Anjaneya Swamy Vari Temple, Being a private trust, represented by its Trustee Pitchuka Hanumantha Rao, S/o.Veerabhadra rao, aged: 41 years, Tailor, Lakshmivarapupeta, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2531 OF 2011 ORDER: Sri Anjaneya Swamy Vari Temple – first respondent is the owner of a tiled house bearing No.29-30-1, situated at Lakshmivarapupeta, Rajahmundry Town. It was under occupation of the petitioners, who claim that they have been recognized in the locality as having possessory title. The first respondent and its executive officer instituted O.S.No.445 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, for eviction. The same was decree ex parte on 06.02.2009. The petitioners/defendants filed A.S.(SR).No.6983 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Rajahmundry, with delay. In their application being I.A.No.3296 of 2009 for condonation of delay of 160 days in filing the appeal, they alleged that (i) they had no knowledge about the decree (ii) they are innocent and uneducated persons having no knowledge of Court proceedings and came to know about the decree only when E.P.No.135 of 2009 was filed and (iii) due to ill health, personal inconvenience and lack of communication, they could not file the appeal within time. Learned Principal District Judge, Rajahmundry, considered these pleas in detail with reference to case laws and by impugned order dated 30.05.2011 dismissed the application for condonation of delay. In this civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the counsel for petitioners submits that the necessary medical evidence was produced before the Court below to show that the first petitioner was suffering from ill health, due to which the appeal could not be filed within time. Further, he would submit that the lower appellate Court failed to consider the case of the petitioners in proper perspective. This Court has perused the impugned order passed by the Principal District Judge. A detailed order has been passed by the Court below considering all the pleas raised by the petitioners. They were also allowed to lead evidence to prove their petition averments. The order is well supported by cogent and convincing reasons and therefore no interference is called for especially when the petitioners made vague allegations. The Civil Revision Petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 11.08.2011 KH