IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38526 of 2010 GUPTESHWAR SINGH son of late Ram Dayal Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.3.2011. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is alleged for running 5 H.P. machine through illegal connection. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the connection was existing in the name of petitioner’s father while there was jointness in the family. Later partition took place and boaring and its land fell in the share of his uncle, Baliram Singh. After disconnection of electric line, connection is there in the name of petitioner’s uncle, Baliram Singh and he is paying regular bills to electricity department. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj (Rohtas) in connection with Bikramganj P.S.Case No. 200 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Md.S. ( Mandhata Singh, J.)