:1 INTHEHIGH COURTOF .^.-^^ '..&'.:••.-,\'°'r..--" ^' ^<s :1 rPs^- ?^ ^ ^^ ^ 0 6 2^ f Sitaram Anger, Son of Late Mahabali Prasad, aged about ...L\.\^-ears, Assistant Teacher, Primary.School Parsahi, Block- Bilha, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block-Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) HtGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT P£TITION(S),NO. 6201 OF 2007 Petitioner Versus Respondents SitaramAnaer The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Ron'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Rakesh Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri ShashankThakur, Panel Lawyerfor the State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on this 15th day of June, 2011) •-(" •' 1. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the petitioner has already continued at Primary School; Parsahi, Development Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, for morethan 3%;years on account of interim order granted by this Court 23:10.2007. The State/respondents rhay be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in vlew public ihterest and administrative exigency. Shri Thakur further submits that the State./respondents shal! not insist upon compliance ofthe impugned order dated 31.08.2007 (Annexure P/1). 2. At this stage, when no effect^ouid be given to thelmpugned order dated 31.08.2007 (Annexure P/1) on account of the interim order dated 23..10.2007 thus, it is not necessary to go inio legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned order. 3. In view ofthe abpve, according to learned counse! appearing forthe petitioner, nothing sun/ives in this petition-for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 5. interim relief granted on 23.10.2007 is vacated. r- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ashok