IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 2743 of 2011. Decided on 2nd May, 2011. Purnima Sharma. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-2, order of transfer. Placing reliance on Annexure P-1, Certificate it is submitted that she has a daughter suffering from 75% disability and she is both physically and mentally challenged. The husband of the petitioner is working in Mandi. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the first respondent within 10 days from today, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent and appropriate order in accordance with law and justice will be passed within another 10 days from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. It will be open for 2 the petitioner to avail leave of the kind due and she may not be compelled to join the transferred station in the meanwhile. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 2nd May, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.