IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19724 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH SON OF SRI KASHI NATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JANTOLA, P.S. PAIRO DISTRICT - BHOJPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.08.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph- 15 of the petition with regard to the date of custody of the petitioner. The offence alleged is under sections 498A, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner who is husband of the deceased has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. As a matter of fact, during investigation, it would appear that daughter of the informant died in course of treatment at Mumbai. It is further submitted that after investigation police submitted charge sheet under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. However, learned Magistrate deferred and took cognizance against the petitioner under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code as well. It is further submitted that after death, the informant was informed by the father of this petitioner that his daughter died in course of treatment at Mumbai. Learned counsel for the State on perusal of the case diary submits that during investigation informant supported the prosecution case and submitted that daughter of the informant died in course of treatment at Mumbai. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 226 of 2008. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J) Jagdish/-