"^, -; /. ^GLE BEIQi IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITIQNISLNO,^^ OF 2010 PETITIONER: °:0^[°'''' .rv^S\^^ ' €i^yv ..•'y^" *.A't' ^- Dr. Roopchand Sirmour, Aged About- 65 Years, S/o- Late Jugut Ram Sirrnour, R/o- Village and Post- Chherkapur (Pallari), Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS .^-- V RESPONDENT(S): 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Departinent of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.Distrcit Ayurvedic Officer, Durg (C.G.) 3. Accountant General, Office of the Accountant General, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA ll ft^ '^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETmON (S} No. 638 of2010 PETITIONER : Dr. Roopehand Sinnour. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND1A SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Aemtaotri, J. Present: Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri AV.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer &r the State/respondent No. 1 & 2. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Assistant Solicitor General forthe respondent No. 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 11 day of Februaty, 2010) With the consent of ieamed counsel appearing for ttie parties, the matter is heard fmallv. 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits that the case, bein^ payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension conmuttee. 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and otfaer connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was eonstituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Kefa Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baynath Mandat dnd another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the !•?-'•°"]"—-—I ^g^.S»^,^ ..^^. "^-~ ;y .^sts^>. \'-.\<\ f<r."L» 1 ^aw^^ judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed m W.P. N6. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appearing tbr the parties. 3. With the consent ofthe parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. fhe office ofthe Advocate General is direeted to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 1 5 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to 1he petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after afibrdin{ proper opportunity of hearmg to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may tile additional documents, if neeessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed wifhin a period offour months from the date of receiptofacopy ofthisorder. --"' 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the leamed counsel appearmg for the respondents for forwarding fhe same to the Committee. - ——- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt