1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 1274 OF 2000 REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 1274 OF 2000 REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 1274 OF 2000 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2000 Union of India .... Applicant (Ori. complainant) Vs. 1) Mehboob Khan Abdul Kadar .... Respondent (Ori. accused) 2) State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. H.V. Mehta for the Applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the Respondents CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. 1) Heard Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the applicant. 2) By this application applicant seeks review of the order passed by this Court on 13th March, 2000 in Criminal Writ Petition 108 of 2000 whereby order passed by Sessions Court allowing production of such documents by Department was set aside. 3) The order was passed by Sessions Court 2 allowing production of such documents during the trial and that order was set aside by this Court after giving valid reasons in the order dtd. 13th March 2000. More than 7 years have passed thereafter. There was never stay to the order dtd. 13th March 2000. In view of the lapse of long time, Mr. Mehta states that this application has been infructuous. 4) Therefore, this application stands disposed of as infructuous. ( J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( J.H. BHATIA, J.) ( J.H. BHATIA, J.)