IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15 of 2011 SUSHIL KUMAR JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 23.2.2011 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the second line of paragraph-2 of the order dated 5.1.2011 due to typographical error in place of respondent nos.4 and 6 only respondent no.4 has been typed. In that view of the matter, the order dated 5.1.2011 is modified to the extent that in place of respondent no.4, it should be read as respondent nos.4 and 6 and a copy of this order as well as order dated 5.1.2011 may also be communicated to respondent no.6 for disposal of the representation filed by the petitioner. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.)