IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JUDRISDICTION Dated Nainital the 28rd March, 2006 Bail Application No. 189 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Umesh Chandra Pandey S/o Padma Dutt Pandey R/o Himmatpur Chaumwala Post Motahaldu, Haldwani District- Nainital ……… Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 67 of 2006 U/s 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. & ¾ D.P.Act Police Station-Bageshwar District-Bageshwar Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi- learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The applicant is the brother-in-law of the deceased and the allegation made in the prior complaint as well as in the present complaint are vague in nature. It is alleged that the applicant resides at District Nainital whereas the incident took place at Bageshwer. The case of the other co-accused is different from the applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused Umesh Chadnra Pandey be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and tow sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the CJM concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 28.03.2006 Shiv