/ IN HE HIGH CCUR. CF sCaPJTAKA A BANGALE Dated this the 30th day of June 1998 BEFONE L 1 HE HON t BLE MR.JUSflCE Y..F.SALDs.NHA flu FLu ION N0 0 1i524/i998 Net jeen: Ikzshjztlltha R,Adyanthaya(Adult) D/o Ramanna G.Shetty, Residing at Fsno Msnzil, II Floor, 2 3A Matharpacady Road, Mazgaon, BOMBAY, represented Per of Attorney Holder H.Hajeeva Adynthaya residing at the above address. ... Petitioner. (By Sri V.V.Upadhaya, Advocate). And: 1.. Stella Crasta (Adult) 2. herad Crasta (—d) 3. Cyril Crasta (do—) 4, Nirmal Crasta (—do—) 5, Jetha Pneirn(adnlf The respondent i is te wife and npondents to 5 are he children of Leo crasta. Respondents I to 4 are resithng at Leo Crasta Comound, Behind Industrial Estate, Konchady, Mangalore. The 5th respondent is residing at No 0 10—154, Shsicthi nagar; Mangaiore—5750 16. fl .. e a .e a a 14 —2— 6. die Land rihinal, represen;ed by its Chairman, Ksn$Iore, Dalcahina aannada District. 7. the ..ahsildar, Kingalore slut, hjvalore Dakshina Kannsda Dia trict. 3. he State of Karnataks, re’-.resented 07 its Seoretaxy Departmen t o f 3evezrne, N. S. Saildin, Sengalore—560 Ccl. ... eson&nt. (37 Smt.LR.Shanthakumari, !CGI, for 3—6 to 8). his g.P. is filtd under Articles 226 227 of the Constitution of End a praying to ‘nash Annemre—A dt. 16—9—61 byrta c.ndent ro.6 in so far as it relates to the ilLs u ed laid. This:.?. o ming n for preliminary hearin 4 this day, the Court araB tte fOUcnw:— 01 ‘1 1 1 ye Sd the e iticne a’ learr d 1dwoete, aid the le med (,overnnmnt Advoc’ e tr respon en a end 8, No notice a bean aeaaed responnts 1 to .4- 5, since this Cour as oni r*. uix6 to pass an order whicn is an extension of tte earlier order assed by my Brother C:2DcarD ULIaL, 3., in W.P.1o. 106b7/94 dated 7—7—97. S.. 3/r S ‘fl a V 14 a e3e 2. 1Zarlier W.4. has been rennded to the tribunal for a denovo l’earlng and the Sg.os. covered by tin order do not ladude Sy.’fo. 292/2. the petitioners learned Advocate points out to im that the Daheildqr contends that Sy.No. 292/2 was a part of the original cider passed in 1981 which this Court has se’ aside and directed a re—In aring. He therefbre suhei’s that the earlier order should aLso cover Sy.!To. 492 2 and that this l2nd aso be included witflu ut tae ss of the endin enpirj. It does a. ear fAt )ae jp some error in he Certified Cop, issued to the petitioners’ learned Advocate on the last oocnion thet Sy.flo.292/2 was not included in the Ai5i Coirt order deted 7—7—97. I’ Is c krified tnat the rrilxznal order dated 16—9-Si in ret,eot of S;. No.292/2 is set aside and tin’ the 2rilnnal, while re—*ciding thee ass tall include this Sy.flo. tiso ... .4/— a VP tot a Leo a 9. tot 2 CDa 0 S to: 0 0 $4 *1 p to t0 0 2t La S ‘4 iii a ct a 0’ S0 CD CD $4 to to I;’ aa /r 4 2 \ * I ID Ct f4e 0 CD CD LeD ‘4. ci I I co