HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9973 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner and the 4th respondent are brothers. The latter submitted an application to the Municipal Corporation of Hydeabad seeking permission to construct on premises bearing No.8-3-825/5/7, admeasuring 141 square yards, at Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad. According to them, the permission was accorded by imposing certain conditions. The petitioner made a representation to the Municipal Corporation in the year 2006 alleging that the 4th respondent made construction in violation of the sanctioned plan. It is also stated that the suit filed by the petitioner against the 4th respondent for partition, was dismissed. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Municipal Corporation did not take any steps against the 4th respondent. 2. A detailed counter – affidavit is filed by the 3rd respondent referring to the nature of steps taken on the representation made by the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned counsel for the 4th respondent. 4. On the face of it, the Writ Petition is frivolous and it is driven by the family rivalry. The effort made by the petitioner to claim share in the premises referred to above, did not fructify. He thought of harassing the 4th respondent in one form or the other. The petitioner does not allege that the 4th respondent has encroached in to any part of his property. The respondents have already initiated steps and informed the same to the petitioner. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J February 17, 2011. KTL