IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1250 of 2008 1. Dilip Ram 2. Raju Ram Both are sons of late Muni Lal Ram 3. Guddar Ram son of late Lukho Ram All r/o of vill. Hasanpur, P.S.Mufassil, Dist. Munger. ---- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ----Opp.Party. For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Matloob Rab, APP ----------- 02 06.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 23.09.2008, passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no. VI, Munger in Sessions Trial no. 661 of 2008, whereby his application filed under Section 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been considered and rejected. Learned trial Court with reference to the allegations contained in the F.I.R. and the injury report has come to the conclusion that there is/are sufficient materials on record to frame charge under Section 307/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits before this Court with reference to the injury report that considering the nature of injury sustained by the injured no case under Section 307 can remotely be said to have been made out. This Court is afraid whether such contention can be considered at the stage of framing of charge. Learned trial Court, on a consideration of materials, has come to the conclusion that the materials on record do justify 2 framing of charge for attempt to commit murder. There is no justification for interference in the order. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)