IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9226 of 2005 SHRI SIDHESHWAR PRASAD Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO ----------- For the Petitioner : Ashok Kumar, Advocate Dr.Rajendra Pd. Advocate Mr.Ashok Kr.Sinha no.3, Adv. For B.S.E.B. : Mr. Subhash Chandra Verma, Adv. ----------- 4 23.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondents. After having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner the order contained in Annexure – 9 dated 2.6.2005 is quashed and the matter is remitted back to the Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, on the ground that impugned order does not show that a couple of questions raised by the appellant in his appeal with regard to the discrimination in matter of punishment as well as the responsibility in terms of the relevant Code of B.S.E.B. etc. has not been dealt with. A mere statement that all matters have been examined in length may not satisfy the requirement of law as has been held in a recent decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Komal Tiwary Vs. The State of Bihar, 2008(2) PLJR Page – 363. The writ application is allowed with the above direction. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)