THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 2706 of 2011. ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution is misconceived as is the application I.A.No. 211 of 2011 in O.S.No. 280 of 2007 filed by the revision petitioner before the court below. The respondent herein filed the suit for permanent injunction, in 2007. Therein, the revision petitioner/defendant filed I.A.No. 211 of 2011 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, under Order 26 Rule 9 C.P.C. to note down the physical features of the schedule property. This application was rejected on the ground that it was the burden of the plaintiff to establish prima facie title and possession over the suit schedule property. For the reasons alike as recorded by the court below, this application is misconceived and the order under revision does not warrant revisional interference. No merits in revision and the same is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 22.07.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 2706 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 22.07.2011.