IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13713 of 2009 Between: M/s. Yedukondalu Kirana Jaggary & General Merchants, H.NO. 1- 106/1, and Godown No. 3-147/1, Main Bazar, Mallareddygudem Village, Mellacheruvu Mandal, Nalgonda District, Rep. by Y. Anki Reddy, S/o. Animi Reddy, Aged 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 1-106/1, Main Bazar Mallareddygudem Village, Mellacheruvu Mandal, Nalgonda Distr ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Police Station, Mellacheruvu, Nalgonda District. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Kodada Circle, Nalgonda District. 3 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. 4 The Prohibition & Excise Sub Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Station, Huzurnagar, Nalgonda District. 5 The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Station, Huzurnagar, Nalgonda District. 6 The Superintendent of Prohibition & Excise, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 to 6:AGP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner questioned the alleged interference with its business in kirana, black jaggery and alum by the respondents. Respondent No.1 filed a counter-affidavit wherein he has denied any interference with the petitioner’s sale of kirana, black jaggery and alum. In paragraph 8, he averred as under: “It is pertinent to submit that all the allegations made by the petitioner against this respondent are false and exaggerated. It is submitted that this respondent never harassed nor interfered with the business activities of the petitioner herein at any point of time. As a precautionary measure to prevent the police from taking any action in future if any complaint lodges against him, he filed the present writ petition. All the other allegations made are false and invented for the purpose of filing the present writ petition.” Having regard to the above stand taken by respondent No.1 in his counter-affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s trade ]in kirana, black jaggery and alum so long as it does not indulge in unlawful trade. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.17914 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 17th JULY, 2009. kvni