IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.52305 of 2007 1. SEIKH ANWARUL son of Seikh Sainullah, 2. Seikh Mahto son of Seikh Anwarul & 3. Seikh Reyaz son of Seikh Anwarul All resident of village- Murgia Tola, Police Station- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran ...Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Seikh Abdul Khair son of Late Seikh Rajjak, resident of village- Adhkaparia, Police Station-Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran …Opposite Parties ----------- 6/ 19.04.2010 This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 6.9.2007 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, at Motihari, in Cr. Revision No. 403 of 2006 /33 of 2007, whereby the revisional court dismissed the application and also against the order dated 29.7.2006 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, in Complaint Case No. C-99 of 2006, by which he has taken cognizance against the petitioners under sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. On 4.2.2009, opposite party no.2 was noticed as to why this application be not disposed of at the admission stage itself. Pursuant thereto, opposite party no.2 appeared and the parties decided to sort out the matter between themselves since the matter relates to financial transaction between them. On 30.3.2010, the parties agreed that if the accused persons pay a sum of rupees ten thousand to the complainant opposite party no.2, matter would be compromised and the complainant/ - 2 - opposite party no.2 would not pursue the matter any further. Today, accused-petitioner no.1 Seikh Anwarul son of Seikh Sainullah has appeared and handed over cash of rupees ten thousand to the opposite party no.2- complainant Seikh Abdul Khair s/o late Seikh Rajjak. Identity of the petitioner no.1 and the opposite party no.2 was verified by this court by asking them their names with parentage and on being satisfied that their identities are correct, the transactions are allowed to be completed between the two. In proof thereof, the counsel for the petitioners and the opposite party no.2 are also signing on the order sheets of the present case that financial dispute has been sorted out between them. In view of such, the order dated 6.9.2007 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, at Motihari, in Cr. Revision No. 403 of 2006 /33 of 2007 and the order dated 29.7.2006 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, in Complaint Case No. C-99 of 2006, by which he has taken cognizance against the petitioners is hereby quashed. In the result, this application is allowed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)