WPSS 136/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri A.K. Bisht, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri J.P. Joshi, the learned counsel for the respondents. The land of the petitioners was acquired in the year 1991. Certain resolution was passed and thereafter, circulars were issued by the State Government giving alternative jobs to those persons or members of their family, whose land was acquired. It transpires that the petitioners approached this Court by filing a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to give them alternate jobs pursuant to acquisition of their land. The said writ petition was disposed of by a judgment dated 24.08.2006 directing the respondents to finalize the appointments of the petitioners and give appointments pursuant to the judgment. It transpires that inspite of this direction, no appointments were made and now, an advertisement has been issued dated 9th February, 2011 inviting applications for appointments on Class III and Class IV posts. The petitioners, being aggrieved, have filed the present writ petition contending that the petitioners are entitled to be given appointments in one of these posts. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to get any relief whatsoever. The judgment of the learned Single Judge is deemed to be no longer a good law in view of the decision of the Full Bench of Allahabad High Court in 2005 (1) UPLBEC 118, Ravindra Kumar vs. District Magistrate, Agra and others, wherein the Full Bench held that circular issued by the Government providing alternate jobs to persons, whose land has been acquired, was unworkable and cannot be given. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 24-02-2011 SP