R.F.A. No. 4245 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 4245 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 1.2.2011 Smt. Sohana Devi and others .... Appellants vs District Land Acquisition Collector- cum-District Revenue Officer and another .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S. S. Walia, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 17.11.2003 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estate of village Arya Nagar, Tehsil and District Hisar, for construction of Hisar-Ghaggar Multi Purpose Channel. The same was followed by notification dated 26.4.2004 issued under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector') assessed the compensation for the acquired land ` 1,40,000/- per acre for nehri and ` 1,00,000/- per acre for tal kind of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 7,00,000/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3873 of 2009 Haryana State and another vs Ram Partap and others, decided on 23.12.2010. R.F.A. No. 4245 of 2010 (2) Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons mentioned in Ram Partap' s case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 1.2.2011. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge