IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 174 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 32 OF 2011 MR. JAGANNATH NAMDEO DEVKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus MR. HANUMANTH NAMDEO DEVKAR ... Respondent Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 19th October, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri Nitin Sardessai, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent and Shri Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents. 2. The Appeal has been admitted. It is not disputed that during the pendency of the application for temporary injunction, there was no injunction operating in favour of the Applicants herein. The apprehension of the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants, Shri Sardessai, is that the Respondents are carrying out mining activities in the suit property. Shri Usgaonkar, the learned Counsel, on the other hand, on instructions pointed out that the Respondents are not carrying out any such mining activities in the suit property. 3. Considering the statements made by the learned Counsel which is accepted and in view of the fact that there was no ad-interim relief operating during the pendency of the application for temporary injunction, I find that there is no material on record to justify any relief at this stage. 4. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*