CRM No. M 4931 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 4931 of 2011 Date of decision: 16.02.2011 Narinder Kumar ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr. P C for issuance of direction to the learned trial Court i.e. S.D.M., Kaithal for concluding the trial/pronounce the order in case titled as Narinder Kumar v. Raj Kumar, filed under Section 133 Cr.P.C within some specified time. It is contended that on 09.03.2010, the spot was inspected and the case was adjourned for 25.03.2010 for order. Thereafter, more than 30 adjournments have been made for pronouncement of the order but till date the order has not been pronounced by the SDM, Kaithal. More than one year has passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the zimini orders from 09.03.2010 to 02.02.2011. A perusal of the aforesaid zimini orders shows that the counsel CRM No. M 4931 of 2011 2 for the parties were present on almost every date of hearing. Inspite of that, the matter is being adjourned for consideration without any rhyme and reason. In view of the above, the SDM, Kaithal is directed to conclude the trial and decide the matter within one month from the receipt of a certified copy of the order. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 16.02.2011 mohan