€§J IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / N WRIT PETITION Malllé 2005 ’r’Z The Sub Divisional Officer [Revenue] Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa [C.G.]. V v, WRIT PETITION CONSTITUTION UNDER ARTICLE OF INDIA 22%(22$ OF THE \ A. x / PETITIONER f I; / :- /Ram Kishun Thawait son ' Suspended Dukhiram, aged about 46 years, ‘. ‘x ‘ Patwari, Posted at Tahsil Office Janjgir, District Janjgir— Champa, R/o near to Paliwai Hospital Champa Road, QR‘ $°.v"¢w%" if§ .. Road, Janjgir, District Janjgir«Champa e’g0‘e “ewe...... §a [C.G.}. VERsus ResPONDEN/Is {If The State of /' ' Chhattisgarh through — Secretary, Department of of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, mm,m,W’ [NP’LZLé 1mm“ mniai ,. r Q € ,qvv Emmy ~ 311wm (1m) / Learned counsel for th the relief of quashing of the $1 become infructuous. The order of suspension has been revoked by the authority concerned. However, he prays for qtlashment of the departrm initiated by respondent No.2. I have gone through th Emd 13—4. Annexure P—3 is t petjh‘oner on 20.4.2005 by V against him. The petitioner charge sheet in which he h; pfayed for appointment of Def The charges leveled age of facts which can only bew enquiry and after due evaluati Enquiry Officer‘, It would not ‘ in this matter at this stage am factual aspect of the matter. e petitioner submits that so far as ispension Older is concerned, it has admitting the petition regarding r :ntal enquiry said to have been e documents filed as Annexure P-3 1e article of charges issued to the ihich 3 charges have been leveled has filed a reply to the aforesaid is denied all the charges and has ense Assistant for him. inst the petitioner are the question letermined after completion of the ion of the material placed before the )e proper for this Court to interfere 1 to record any finding in relation to SP/FS/2005 ~ 20,000 mmwieamst Wadi? wrests'WW ewmai 15.6.2005 Shri M.K.Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner. Shri G.K.Beriwal, Dy. Advocate General for the State] respondents. Heard on admission.