WP(C) 5373/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr.P.J.Phukan learned counsel appearing for petitioner. Also heard Ms.R.Deka learned Standing Counsel , PWD. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is a registered Govt. contrac tor and he carried out certain works under the respondents within the stipulate d time worth Rs.6.12 lakh but the same remains still outstanding and payable to the petitioner from the department. The petitioner approached the respondent aut horities on several occasion but the same has not been paid to him and according ly by way of filing the instant writ petition he has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to make payment of the aforesaid amount. It is admitted at the Bar that such payment of the contractor’s bill and the manner and method to be dealt with in such cases has been rendered by a Ful l Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 484/2008 and similar other 194 writ petitions reported in 2008(4) GLT 1(FB) (Tamsher Ali and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors.) and the issue involved in the instant case is covered by the aforesaid decision . In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the directi ons that the petitioner as well as the respondent authorities shall be bound b y the principle of law and directions as passed in the case of Tamsher Ali (sup ra) and the respondent authorities shall deal with the grievance of the petition er as per the directions contained in Tamsher Ali (supra) and pay the amount to the petitioner to which he is entitled to. With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.