IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6802 of 2011 RAJU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29. 03. 2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the grains were forcibly unloaded by the unknown criminals. Subsequently, from the joint house of the petitioner and his brother some empty bags with distinctive marks were recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s brother being an Advocate is prosecuting the local police officials which resulted into lodging of the case. Considering the fact that the grains have not been recovered and only empty bags from joint family house have been recovered, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender 2 before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 210 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)