THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1728 of 2010 Oral Judgment: This revision is directed against the order dated 18.3.2010 in C.M.A. No. 37 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional District Judge(Fast Track Court), Mahabubnagar whereby, the learned II Additional District Judge granted temporary injunction in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs restraining the petitioners-defendants and their followers from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the respondents over the suit schedule property. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents herein filed O.S. No. 116 of 2008 before the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar for declaration of title; for restoration of revenue entries in Column No.13 of pahanies in their name and for consequential relief of permanent injunction. In that suit, they filed I.A. No. 531 of 2008 for temporary injunction. The learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, having heard the petitioners and the respondents, through order 20.8.2008, while refusing to grant temporary injunction in favour of the respondents, dismissed the said I.A. Aggrieved by the said order, the respondents carried the matter in appeal before the learned II Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar. The learned II Additional District Judge, by the order impugned in this revision, while setting aside the order dated 20.8.2008 of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar in I.A. No.531 of 2008 in O.S. No. 1186 of 2008, allowed the said appeal and granted temporary injunction in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs. Being aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners-defendants filed the present revision. On 23.6.2010, this Court while ordering notice before admission, suspended the impugned order dated 18.3.2010 of the learned II Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar. Heard. Having regard to the fact that there was no injunction during the pendency of the suit and also the fact that the impugned order dated 18.3.2010 granted by the lower appellate Court has been suspended by this Court on 23.6.2010, in my considered view, it is desirable that the parties be directed to maintain status-quo during the pendency of the Suit. Accordingly, this revision is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to maintain status-quo, pending disposal of the suit in O.S. No.116 of 2008. No costs. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) Date: 04.08.2010 pnb