IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2465 of 2007 BISHWANATH PRASAD Versus GANESH PRASAD & ANR ----------- 8. 19.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite service of notices, no one appears on behalf of the opposite parties. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances mentioned in the application for condonation of delay, the same are found to be satisfactory and delay is condoned. I.A. No.2725 of 2008 is, accordingly, disposed of. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, Civil Revision No.971 of 2004 is directed to be restored to its original file. The application is, accordingly, allowed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)