IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 297 of 2011 (S/B) Amar Singh Gunjyal ….……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ………. Respondents. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent nos. 1& 2. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate for the Intervener / applicant. . Date of Judgment: 17.11.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) Being aggrieved by the mid session transfer, the present writ petition was filed. It was contended by the petitioner that the said transfer was made not in exigency of service, nor on administrative ground, but only to accommodate respondent no.3. On the last occasion when the matter was listed, learned counsel for respondent no.3 submitted that according to the transfer policy, a person, who is to retire within two years, is entitled to opt for a posting of his choice and, accordingly, the respondent no.3 opted to be posted as District Development Officer, Nainital or as Joint Director, Uttarakhand Rural Development Institute, Udham Singh Nagar. Petitioner is presently posted as the District Development Officer, Nainital. It appears that the State Government, in order to honour the said option of respondent no.3, transferred the petitioner to the post held by respondent no.3 and transferred respondent no.3 to the post held by the petitioner. It was indicated by the learned counsel for respondent no.3 on the last occasion that the post of Joint Director, Uttarakhand Rural Development Institute, Udham Singh Nagar is still lying vacant and the said respondent having had also opted to be posted there has no qualm, if he is posted there. 2 2. In the circumstances, the Court called upon the State to inform as to why respondent no.3 could not be accommodated at Udham Singh Nagar in the post of Joint Director, Uttarakhand Rural Development Institute, which is still lying vacant and had to disturb the petitioner in the mid session. The learned counsel appearing for the State has submitted that the matter was reconsidered by the State and, accordingly, on 16th November, 2011 an order has been passed by the State Government transferring respondent no.3 as Joint Director, Uttarakhand Rural Development Institute, Udham Singh Nagar. In those circumstances, the purpose of transferring the petitioner has come to an end and, accordingly, we quash the order of transfer of the petitioner. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 17.11.2011 17.11.2011 sk