^ r ^^^ ^^^ ^^t^-"" S.d^ ^r.'°JS'-.-*' IN THE ^ff'COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.NojA<% 2006 Petitioner ................ Tilak Ram Jaiswal aged 45 years ^ Son of Shri Jhagguu ram Jaiswal, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Jharargota Block Mohala, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents .............1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, t*^, ,ti*lliaI/1itelaEaEe'BeBgirtne9t, ^ D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^- 2. Principal High School, Dangarh, - Block Mohala District Rajnandgaon Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia fbr the issuarice of WRIT in the nature of Mandamus certiorari, Prohibition and for any other suitable writ or writs Order or orders, direction or^ direction XI-HC-78 HTRCfT SfWl^l 3^ -^WW-tl, w!\»i ,Rlciwy ^^..^^p...^4.c.^200 3ll^i'i 'ivn (yiI^iyT) sn^rqiTl^ira; crarsn^rj m „/<' Ban/e g^arwBfersn^r 5.7.2006 Shri R.S. Shrivastava, coun^el Miss Dipali Pandey, Panel advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition, the pe): prohibited from stopping/recoverinj paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Increments were granted to th^ qualification of B. Ed. and novk) respondents may stop two advanite the amount already paid. So far no notice of recovery] passed and the petitioner has file(l apprehension. Therefore, this wfrit dismissed. However, as and whejn will be at liberty to approach approF|riate 1>l«lCT<fl-l1|t«'llfffecfl'<Rl^l< ^i3T|^lT3n^T [el for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on titioner has prayed that respondents be the benefit of two advance increments [^etitioner submitted that two advance petitioner on account of acquiring the petitioner is apprehending that increments and also they recovered |has been issued or any order has been this petition merely on the ground of petition is premature and same is cause of action arises, the petitioner Forum. ..-—— Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge