HIGH CCURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. HON’BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA. J W.P.(e} No. 5718 of 2009 PETITIONER : Sarvadanand Choudhry, S/o Late Shri Shivnarayan Choudhry, aged about 48 years, occupation -— business, resident of village and post Kutru, Tahsil Bhairamgarh, District Beejapur (CG) Vs RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. The Collector, District Beejapur (CG) 3. Tahsildar, Bhairamgarh, District Beejapur (CG) Madhukar Rao, K. Assistant'Teacher (Leader of Saiva Judum), Village Bedare, Tahs“ Bhairamgarh. resident of village Kutru, District Beejapur (CG) Present: Shri $andeep Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, learned GA for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 7‘“ October, 2009) Dhirendra Mishra, J Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in settled possession of the disputed land for the Iast 25 years. He had undertaken construction over the disputed premises. however, he was restrained by Naib Tehsildar by an order of stay, which was subsequently vacated. However, respondent No.3 at the instance of resd‘ohdent No.4 is threatening to demolish the house constructed by the petitioner without passing any formal order. He further submits that the petitioner has already made a representation dated 22.9.2009 to the Collector against highhanded action of respondent No.3 vide'Annexure P18, but the same has not been considered and decided till date. He submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Collector/respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi. learned PL appearing for the State submits that if the petitioner files a fresh representation before the Collector for redressal of ks his grievances, the same shal! be conside;ed and decided within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In view of above submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to tile a fresh representation before the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievances raised in this petition who in turn shall consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance With law Within a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation Sd/- Dhlrendra Mlshrai Judge / ’