IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 RP.No. 768 of 2011(D) ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21032/2011 Dated 31/08/2011 .................... PETITIONER/REVIEW PETITIONER: --------------------------------------- SMT.SAVITHRI.P, MANAGER, CHEEKILODE AMLP SCHOOL, CHEEKKILODE.P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALIDHARAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, BALUSSERY,KOZHIKODE- 673 105. 3. T.BABURAJ, HEADMASTER,CHEEKKILODE AMLP SCHOOL,CHEEKKILODE .P.O,KOZHIKODE- 673 104. BY SRI. P.I. DAVIS, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.No.768/2011 A P P E N D I X CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21032/11 DTD. 31.8.11. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- REVIEW PETITION NO.768 OF 2011 in W.P.(C)No.21032 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 O R D E R This is a Review Petition filed by the Manager. The learned counsel for the review petitioner submitted that this Court in paragraph No.8 of the judgment has recorded the statement by the learned Government Pleader regarding payment of salary that it will be subject to the outcome of the Writ Petition and it requires a clarification. 2. On reading through paragraph No.8, I am not satisfied that it requires a review as such. What is recorded is the submission by the learned Government Pleader. Therefore, there is no apparent error in the judgment and the Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn