WP(C) 4127/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr A. Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr AR Sikdar, le arned counsel for the Respondent No.6; and Mr G. Soren, learned State counsel ap pearing for the other Respondents. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the order dated 30 th June 2010 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Goalpara Zilla Parisahd allo wing the Respondent No.5 to collect the tolls temporarily in the Chattaimari Pas huhat that falls within the jurisdiction of the Goalpara Zilla Parishad, till th e final settlement in accordance with the Assam Panchayat Act 1994 is made. It appears that the earlier tender process initiated for settlement of t he said hat by the zilla parishad was set aside by the Court vide order dated 29 th June 2010 passed in WP(C) 3776/2010 as the zilla parishad under the provision s of the Act had no jurisdiction to issue any NIT. The authority thereafter was required to issue a fresh NIT for settlemen t of the said market in question, which according to the petitioner, has not bee n done till date, and instead an interim arrangement with the Respondent No.6 ha s been made, which is still continuing. One of the prayers in the writ petition being to direct the Respondent a uthorities to initiate the tender process in accordance with the provisions of t he Act, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Anchali k Panchayat to initiate the tender process by issuing NIT and to complete the sa id process within a period of 45 days from today, if such NIT has not been issue d in the meantime. Since by the order dated 30th June 2010 an interim arrangemen t was only made allowing the Respondent No.6 to collect the tolls from the said hat till the final settlement is made, I do not find any reason to interfere wit h such interim arrangement made. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.