Criminal Writ Petition No. of 2233 of 2010. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. of 2233 of 2010. Date of Decision: 06.01.2011. Ved Parkash .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate & Ms. Aditi Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G. Haryana. NAWAB SINGH.J (ORAL) Ved Parkash son of Hari Chand-petitioner is undergoing imprisonment for life in case bearing First Information Report No. 586 dated November 25th, 1991 under Section 302 IPC, Police Station City, Rewari. He filed an application to release him temporarily on the ground of ailment. The Superintendent Jail, Karnal dismissed the application on September 1st, 2010 (Annexure P-4). Aggrieved of the same, petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends (i) that petitioner is a Senior citizen; (ii) that as per the jail custody certificate dated March 28th, 2009, petitioner has undergone actual sentence of 6 years 1 month and 5 days, that is, as on date about 8 years; (iii) that during confinement, there had never been any complaint of any sort against him; (iv) that during the period he remained on parole, he never absented as mentioned in the jail custody certificate (Annexure P-6); (v) that during his confinement, he lost his only son; (vi) that he is Ex-serviceman and is a pensioner; (vii) that he owns agricultural land situated in village Sherian Tehsil Beri District Jhajjar Criminal Writ Petition No. of 2233 of 2010. 2 vide jamabandi for the year 2000-01 (Annexure P-5); (viii) As per record (Annexure P-2), he remained under treatment at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Chandigarh and PGIMS, Rohtak and it also finds mentioned in the order dated September 1st, 2009 of Superintendent Jail, Hisar and; (ix) that earlier petitioner filed petition bearing Criminal Misc. No. 6696 of 2010 before this Court and this Court directed to release him on furnishing two sureties in the sum of Rs.1 lac to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Rewari but unfortunately he could not furnish the sureties so, the petitioner be temporarily released on his furnishing personal bond. 3. After hearing counsel for the petitioner and perusing the entire record referred to above, the ground on which the parole is sought is convincing. Thus, it is ordered that petitioner be temporarily released on parole for treatment for a period of four weeks on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Rewari. The period of release shall commence from the day, he is released from the jail. 06.01.2011. (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE