1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4163/2009 (Shrikrushna S. Sonukale ..vs.. Smt. Sumitrabai S. Sonukale and another) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- NOVEMBER 18, 2009 Heard. The petitioner contends that property was bequeathed in his favour by his deceased father. The mother of petitioner claimed her share in that property by filing a suit jointly along with present petitioner showing herself to be next friend of minor petitioner. The said suit came to be decreed and then she filed Regular Execution No. 17/1999. During pendency of the execution, petitioner attained majority and filed a civil suit challenging said judgment and decree procured by his mother. That suit has been dismissed and appeal against it is pending. In these circumstances, in Regular Execution No. 17/1999, he raised objection and sought postponement of execution or then in any case of recording of satisfaction of the decree. The Court below has by impugned order found 2 that such a satisfaction cannot be recorded. It also found that petitioner was acting in conspiracy and to the prejudice of his mother. I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. The appeal filed by petitioner is very much pending and petitioner can obtain appropriate orders in said appeal. The petitioner can also move the concerned Court for expeditious consideration of said appeal. With these directions, writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale.