<i. HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.tSl NO.&752 pL2006 PETITIONER Kuber Singh Deshmukh, aged 50 years, S/o. Shri Nein Singh Choudhaiy, Assistaat Teacher, Govt. Girls Prunaiy School, Auchod, Dui^, TahsU & Distict Durg. Versus JRESPONDENTS 1 The State Govemment of Chliattisgarh, Through fhe Secretaiy, Education Departiaent, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Block Educatioa OfBcer, Durg iC.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constltutioa of Indiai Appearance: Shri Ajay Sbrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance copy.__ (24.08.2007) SUNIL KUIfflAR SINHA^J. Heard on adnussion. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits fhat fhe petitioner has passed B.T.I, examination on his own expenses, fherefore, he is entitled to receive two advance iacreinents accordiag to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also subinits that ia inaiiy identical matters, fhe petitions have beeu allowed iu terins of the order passed ia the case of Yashwtint Kuriwr Bhewwdweif Vs. SSiinlcipal Corporuffon, Burg cmd another S2006 fIS 10PJS-CG 96}. He submits that fhe case of fhe petitioner is squarely coveied by the said Judgment. This legal position B not disputed by the leamed counsel for fhe State. However, he submits fhat tbe order may be passed ia temis of the said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regardiag petitioner's such qualificatioii. r 2 W.P.fS) No. 6752 of 2006 Accordingly, fhis writ petition is aUowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashivant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and anofher (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher fhe petitioner had acquired B.T.I. Examiaation Certificate on bis own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance iacrements or not. The petition stands finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti