IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 11.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.38169 of 2006 R.Chandrasekarn ..Applicant vs. 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 005. 2. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. ..Respondents Original Application No.5307 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to call for records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in G.O.No.765 Revenue (Per.5(1) dated 11.9.1998 and quash the same in so far as it regularises the period of suspension from 2.7.1984 to 26.6.1990 as Unearned Leave without Medical Certificate and direct the respondents to regularise the said period as duty period as done in the case of Mr.R.Dhasarathan in G.O.No.844, Revenue (Per.7-2) Department dated 16.10.1998 and grant him all the consequential benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mohanraj For Respondents : Mr.S.Sivashanmugam, Government Advocate. O R D E R Original Application No.5307 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to call for records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent in G.O.No.765 Revenue (Per.5(1) dated 11.9.1998 and quash the same in so far as it regularises the period of suspension from 2.7.1984 to 26.6.1990 as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Unearned Leave without Medical Certificate and direct the respondents to regularise the said period as duty period as done in the case of Mr.R.Dhasarathan in G.O.No.844, Revenue (Per.7-2) Department dated 16.10.1998 and grant him all the consequential benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. At the time of final hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner pleads that the petitioner has made a representation to the first respondent on 2.11.1998 to consider his case for regularisation on par with his co-employee by name Mr.Dasarathan, who also had the benefit of the order of the Tribunal and the Department had regularised his period of suspension. 3. In such view of the matter, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 2.11.1998 on merits and in accordance with law and disposed off the same within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is also permitted to make further representation if he so desires to the competent authority and the authority shall dispose off the same on merits and in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed off accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To 1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 005. 2. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. + 1 c.c. to Mr. M. Ravi, Advocate. S.R.No.10758. + 1 c.c. to The Special Government Pleader. S.R.No.10715. W.P.No.38169 of 2006 SJ (CO) GSK 23.02.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/