1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1649 of 2008 (M/S) Pranavesh Pushkal Kumar Singh S/o Sri Ramesh Kumar Singh R/o Village Kanoth, P.O. Nauti, District Chamoli Through her father Sri Ramesh Kumar . Petitioner ...………… [ Versus 1. Board of School Education Uttarakhand, Ramnagar, Through its Secretary 2. Principal Government Inter College, Naini, Chamoli. ...…………. Respondents Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Miyan, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent No. 1 to complete the scrutiny of the answer book of the petitioner in the subject of Sanskrit. 3) Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a student of Government Inter College, Naini, District 2 Chamoli. He appeared in the High School examination for the Session 2007-08, conducted by respondent No. 1. It is pleaded on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a meritorious student, and was expecting 90 per cent marks in Sanskrit, and he was shocked to see that he was awarded only 64 per cent marks in said subject. The petitioner sought re-evaluation of his answer sheet. By the letter dated 22.08.2008, issued by respondent No. 1, it is informed to the petitioner that under the rules there is no provision for re-evaluation. However, the petitioner had already sought scrutiny of the marks, which is on. 4) Learned counsel for the parties agree that this writ petition may be summarily disposed of directing the respondent No. 1 to declare the result of the scrutiny, within a period of one month. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition is summarily disposed of directing the respondent No. 1 to declare the result of the scrutiny, sought by the petitioner in respect of his answer sheet of the subject of Sanskrit, within a period of one month, from the date certified copy of this order is produced before said authority. (Interim Relief Application No. 6208 of 2008 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) [ Dt. September 18, 2008. H.Negi 3