>^^ ^•111.-..-1'.'. •i\-. ::,"- ^^HK^tttjri GOtJR^X)E^amS^^t3ft[^¥f^'t"BtlSASPUR '•fCHHATTISGARHl.'^:'^ CoatetnptCase (Q No. lt4 /2011. (Ansmgoutofopderdate<T7.04.1Qpa^ p€tx^os^^(^^Sf20iO^ ,.y PETmONER: ^ Q^-^-^^ Smf.ReetaKAirre, wife^^ 51 yegirs,w6^r^^ RaghunathHospital,Am^ Distrief Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Respondent: {Contemnor): Dr.Samsuduhay tUe thenCivilSui^o eiimChiefHbspitalSuper^ Ambikapur, Sai^uja,Presently as Chief Medical anld Healtfa Officer, Ambikapur, Sai^u|a, Chhattisgarh^ CONTEMPT PETmON UNDER ARTIGLE 215 OF THE CQNSTmjTION OF INDIA READ WTTH ^ECTION 12 QF THB CQNTEMPTQILCQURTSACT. ifcffi -HC-22 ^,\\ W^T^T r^i5h 'sn^r 5h^i<=h^Tfi^ ^Ef ^L||<L||^^ ^Tll^^Ko, fadl1My 3TT^T ^[^ ^rv^. <^^f'cy^.^y^ii •^ 20b WHC(TT9hHlcb 'fN^ST" 'STT^T'^<rT^R Tif^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohari 17-02-2011 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, couns^l forthe petitioner. Heard. Learned counsef for the pet|tioner 2010 passed in VVrit Petition (S) N41098 dated 27-02-2009, by which, recov^ry directed that ifthe amount has afreacpy the said amount, subject to verific^tion Learned counsel submits that after respondents have not made further has aiready been recovered freat^d refunded and in the garb ofverificati^ for the tost more than eight months, the Considering the submission after the order passed by this Court, so far as refynd ofthe recovered aml matter is stilt pending consideration| court, it woutd not be proper to is^i respondent authorities did not cor|iply expeditiousiy and within reasonable| this Court, the petitioner would be| months. With the aforesaid observatioi <^l^ld41^ ^i^cnl'^fe1^ <r^^i< ^3Tf^W 3TT^[ Shrivastwa,J. submits that vide order dated 07-04- of 2010, this Court quashed the order was ordered against the petitioner and been recovered, the petitioner is entitled to of facts and in accordance with taw. order has been passed by this Court, the •ecovery. However, so far, the amount which it to be excess amount, has not been m of facts, the matter has been kept pencting nhade by learned counsel for the petitioner that |io further recovery is being made and that in )unt is concerned, due to certain reasons, the [before ttie authorities, in the opinion of this ^ue any notice at present However, if the with the order passed by this Court jtime and no refund is made, as directed by at liberty to revtve the petition after ttiree 1, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^ft^ ^fe^