1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8417/2007 Radha Kishan Versus Addl. District & Session Judge, Malpura, Tonk & Others Date of Order :: 12th August, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. M.M. Ranjan for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for declaration, cancellation of sale deed and permanent injunction against the defendant- petitioner and during the pendency of that suit, the plaintiff filed an application under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure for production of certain documents. The trial court allowed the application vide order dated 6th September, 2007 which is impugned in this writ petition preferred on behalf of the defendant no.3. 3. I have considered the submissions of leaned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by the trial court for 2 allowing the application and after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK