IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5906 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 5906 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 5906 OF 2006. Premchand Shrinath Gupta. ... Petitioner. V/s. Sangita Premchand Gupta. ... Respondent. A.K.Singh for the petitioner. S.S.Kudalkar for the respondent. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 5th September 2006. DATED: 5th September 2006. DATED: 5th September 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. . Perused petition. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Court below is a reasonable and possible view. No perversity in the impugned order is demonstrated by the petitioner. It is not in dispute that the petitioner- husband is working with M/s.Times of India. No salary certificate is produced by him showing his current salary. 3. In this view of the matter, petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)