C.W.P. No.17581 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.17581 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.09.2011 Satyadev ....Petitioner Versus District Red Cross Society ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. D.S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The petitioner, herein, is seeking direction to the respondents to regularize his services on the post of Ambulance Driver w.e.f. 10.04.2006 on account of completing more than 10 years of regular service on 10.04.2006 as per the law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case titled as Secretary, State of Karnataka and othes vs. Umadevi (3) and others reported as 2006(4) SCC 1, as well as, the case titled as State of Karnataka and others vs. M.L. Kesari and others reported as 2010(9) SCC 247. It is contended that instead of regularizing the services of the petitioner, the respondent No.3 forbade him from signing the Attendance Register though the respondents are taking work from him on regular basis till date. The petitioner has not even been paid the salary. He is stated to be more than 50 years. It is further contended that the Government of C.W.P. No.17581 of 2011 2 Haryana issued notification to regularize all its ad hoc/contract/work charged/daily wages and part time employees who have completed ten years of regular service as on 10.04.2006. He is stated to have completed ten years. The petitioner had also sent an advance notice/demand notice dated 04.06.2011 requesting the respondents to grant him the said relief. However, the said notice has not been decided. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the advance notice/demand notice dated 04.06.2011 (Annexure P-2) as expeditiously as possible preferably within two months from the receipt of a copy of this order. However, in case, the petitioner is found entitled for the said relief, the same shall be granted forthwith. In case, the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by passing a speaking order. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 20.09.2011 JUDGE gurpreet