IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No.16160 of 2010 & C.W.P. Nos.7346 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 23 ,2010 Mufid Khan .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. R. K. Malik, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. H. N. Mehtani, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. This application is filed by the counsel for Haryana Public Service Commission to point out that the writ petition is rendered infructuous as the petitioner has not qualified in the written examination. This fact is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. The writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. December 23,2010 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE