IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8287 of 2008 Between: Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust Tettekunta Village (Chandragiri Agraharam), Vemulawada Mandal, Karimnagar District rep. by its Chairman D.Prabhakar Rao S/o.D.Surya Rao, Aged about 63 years. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Siricilla, Karimnagar District. 2 The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Govt. of A.P., Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 3 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District. 4 Mr.A.Mallaiah R/o.Chandragiri village, Vemulawada Mandal, Karimnagar District. 5 Gajibinkar Narayana S/o.Rajaiah R/o.Siricilla Town, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MOHD.ASIFUDDIN Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3, in not obeying the orders of higher authorities for conducting an inquiry and not preventing respondent Nos.4 and 5 from committing trespass into the Mehar Baba Temple to disturb the bhajans, as arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner claims to be Chairman of Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust, Tettekunta Village (Chandigiri Agraharam), Vemulawada Mandal, Krishna District. On the allegation that respondent Nos.4 and 5 were unduly interfering with the activities being carried on in the said temple, the petitioner filed W.P.No.3354 of 2008 in this Court. On 25-02-2008, on the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that the Police decided to extend protection to the petitioner, this Court granted interim direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to give such protection. On 10-03-2008, this Court disposed of the said Writ Petition in terms of interim order dated 25-02-2008. The petitioner filed the present Writ Petition alleging that in spite of the directions granted by this Court and the letters addressed by the Commissioner, Endowment Department, to the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar, respondent Nos.1 and 3 have not been extending protection. Having heard Sri Mohd.Asifuddin, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record, I am of the view that this Writ Petition is wholly misconceived. As noted supra, this Court disposed of W.P.No.3354 of 2008 in terms of interim order dated 25- 02-2008, passed earlier in the said Writ Petition, where under directions were given to the police for giving protection. If the order in the said Writ Petition is not complied with, the petitioner is entitled to seek enforcement of the same. On the purported ground that the said order is not complied with, the petitioner cannot be permitted to file successive Writ Petitions again and again. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.10948 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 17th April, 2008 lur