IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8617 of 2010 MALIK YADAV SON OF LATE DHANUSH LAL YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICER PHULPARAS, POLICE STATION PHULPARAS, DISTRICT MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, NEW SECRETARITE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, NEW SECRETARITE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, PROVIDENT FUND, DIRECTORATE 4TH FLOOR, PANT BHAWAN, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MADHUBANI 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, DARBHANGA. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT OFFICER, MADHUBANI. ----------- 02. 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation, he has been paid all his retiral dues except part of the provident fund dues for the period prior to November 1976 required to be settled and paid. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though petitioner has represented his grievance earlier, however, for 2 expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claims or part of the claims are not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)