IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16949 of 2011 Rameshwar Prasad Versus Subhash Prasad & Ors ---------------------------------- 2. 29.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 9.6.2011 passed by Musif-2, Chapra in Title Suit No. 387 of 2000 whereby the learned court below rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 10 (2) of the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below rejected the application on the ground that the plaintiff prayed the relief for declaration of tile over the suit property. From perusal of the Schedule 1 of the Act 2009 referred to above it appears that the competent authority constituted under the Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 has no jurisdiction to declare title of any person. In other words, the said competent authority has no jurisdiction to decide the present suit filed by the plaintiff. I therefore, find no reason to interfere with impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)