IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 9TH JANUARY 2009 / 19TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 23388 of 2008(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- AGITHA.P.M, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O.P.MUKUNDAN, PAVANGHAT HOUSE, MANGATTIRI.P.O, TIRUR-676105, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM, SMT.K.P.AMBIKA, SRI.THOMSTINE K.AUGUSTINE, SRI.C.N.GOPAKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHILPALAM, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O,MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY., THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.23388/2008-H: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 26/12/07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE INFORMATION OFFICER, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REPLY NO. PR/RTI/2006 DD. 24/01/08 RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE R.1. BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 28/06/08 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE MARK LIST SHOWING THE MARKS AWARDED IN M.A. FINAL YEAR EXAMINATION CONDUCTED IN APRIL 2002. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF M.A. FINAL DEGREE EXAMINATION DECLARED IN APRIL 2003. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE MEMO NO. RV/III/II/MA/1422 DTD. 06/08/08 ISSUED BY THE R.2. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DTD. 21/08/08 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 23388 OF 2008 (H) ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that she has completed M.A.Sociology under Distance Education Scheme of the first respondent University. For two papers namely, (1) Sociology of Urban Development and (2) Social Structure and Change in India, she appeared for the improvement examination held in 2005. Thereafter, she applied for revaluation of the papers. It would appear that the first respondent University did not conduct the revaluation for the reason that the answer papers were misplaced. According to the University, subsequently they came to the conclusion that the answer papers are not traceable. Thereupon, University issued Exhibit P6 memo to the petitioner requiring her to give a declaration as suggested therein and petitioner filed Exhibit P7 requesting to declare the results awarding marks for Viva Voce. Exhibit P7 has been sent as early as on 21.8.2008 and the University has not taken any decision thereon or communicated to the petitioner so far. W.P.(C) No.23388/2008 - 2 - In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the first respondent shall take a decision on Exhibit P7 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks on production of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE skr // True copy // P.A. to Judge.