1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5379 OF 2009 (Ajabrao G. Pardhi vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 10, 2009. Heard Shri Khubalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. On the basis of sale deed, the revenue authorities have taken mutation entries and those orders have been maintained by Additional Collector, Nagpur, in appeal. The contention is, the person who executed the sale deeds had himself no title and that was not looked into. The orders show that purchaser – society has been placed into possession, some lay out has been developed and members of that society are also handed over the possession. During arguments, it has transpired that the Civil Suit filed by the petitioner against his brother in the matter is already pending. It is, therefore, apparent that the mutation orders cannot prejudice the Civil rights of the petitioner in any way and the adjudication by Civil Court is binding on all concerned. Shri Khubalkar, learned counsel has urged that on the basis of these erroneous entries in revenue 2 records, Respondent No.4 – Society is misleading the people and third party interests are being created. It is open to the petitioner to obtain appropriate orders against the society in the matter from the Competent Court. No case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.