IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1206 of 2008 SUBODH PRASAD YADAV Versus JANARDHAN MAHTO @ JANARDHAN YADAV ----------- 2 26.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, when two documents were sought to be exhibited, the Trial Court was required to give reasons for exhibiting both of them. It would be found from the impugned order that while some sort of explanation has been given for accepting compensation roll for its being marked as exhibit by treating it to be a public document, there is nothing to show as to how an unregistered power of attorney, which is not a public document, has been taken on record and made exhibit. That being so, this civil revision application is allowed in part by setting aside that part of the impugned order by which power of attorney has been directed to be made exhibit. The Court below however may reconsider the said prayer once again in accordance with law. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this civil revision application is hereby allowed in part to the extent indicated above. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)