THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.403 OF 2007 ORDER: Heard the counsel. The learned counsel representing the petitioners-plaintiffs had taken this Court through the grounds of revision and the reasons recorded by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Palakonda, and would maintain that the learned Judge totally eared in dismissing the application. On the contrary the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Arbitration had taken this Court through the reasons recorded by the learned Judge and would maintain that only with a view to further delay the matter this application has been filed. The learned AGP would also contend that this being a suit for mere permanent injunction, even if the party be impleaded, it would not seriously affect the case of the petitioners-plaintiffs. This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred by the petitioners-plaintiffs against the order dated 30.10.2006 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Palakonda, in I.A.No.253 of 2004 in O.S.No.82 of 2001. The learned Judge, in fact, recorded as hereunder. “In the plaint itself the above said facts are disclosed and as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel Assistant Government Pleader the proposed defendant No.3 is not impleaded as defendant in the plaint. As rightly argued by the learned Assistant Government Pleader to decide whether the said orders of the C.S.L.R. correct or not, the C.S.L.R. need not be impleaded as party, and in the absence of the C.S.L.R. the variety of the orders and jurisdiction in passing the orders can be decided. Since, this petition is filed after about three years from the date of filing this suit, that too, at the stage, when the suit is coming for trial, it can be held that the petitioners filed this petition only to protract the litigation. For the said reasons, I am of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled to the relief sought for.” In the light of the reasons recorded by the learned Judge, this Court is not of the considered opinion that it is not a fit matter to be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ (P.S. NARAYANA, J.) 23rd June, 2010 Js.