IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25895 of 2007 Between: N. Johan Yadav, S/o.Ramulu, R/o. H.No. 220/20/2, Hanman Nagar, Devarakonda Village & Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Rep by its Managing Director, Civil Supplies Bhavan, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector & E.O.E.D., AP State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Nalgonda District. 3 The District Manager, AP State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Nalgonda District. 4 M.A. Siraj Khan, S/o. Not known to petitioner, Post Konda Mallepally Mandal, Devarakonda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for Respondent No.4:MR. M.MADHAVA REDDY ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prays that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the PAD/2/Movt./FG/5(38)/2794/2007-08, dt. 1-12-2007 issued by the 1st respondent in respect of Devarakonda (MLS) is illegal and arbitrary and vehicles the terms and conditions of tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent and set aside the same as it violates Under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to accept the tender submitted by the petitioner and allow to work.” In view of the fact that the period, for which, tenders were called for, namely, from 01.11.2007 to 31.03.2008, is expired, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JUNE, 2009. kvni