IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 20.04.2011 Arb. Case No.4 of 2010 Vinod Bansal ...Petitioner Versus M/s Vatika Land Base Limited ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. Alok Jagga, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the respondent(s). HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) For order see Arbitration Case No.3 of 2010 titled “Kunal Bansal Vs. M/s Vatika Land Base Limited”. 20.04.2011 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE