(2 ?.l0 o' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BJLASPUR Writ Petition (StNO 3^S^- /2006 PET1T10NER Laxman Lal Sahu, S/o Aghanuram Sahu, aged 35 years, Assistant \" ^•"'cfllb^ Teacher, Primary School Tuta, ..•i'°-l;V^"' ...«^ '/l> ®'^y".<^'""^ Abhanpur, R/o Near Mahadev ...^/\/\y Mandir, Laxminagar, ..-^y^ '•;' y Naka, Raipur (C.G.) VERSAJS RESPONDENTS ^<\. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary General Administrative Department Mantralaya D.K.S., Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) /2. District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector ^ Raipur (C.G.) y-un^y-'p^^yy ,, ksj^sww/ ^s^-^—'^y 'sigB? ChWfS,^ /'' WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA E XI-HC-78 «<iH<tii *tncb 3^'^(PTRW, ®Tnu*16,RldKiy .^^...^^^^ 200 3ii^i 4ach (•idta'51^) sn^rqir R.ii»b ^n^Tsb*lit> Barve ^z'"' /-y ^' S^IRRBfitT'W^fr Dean 13.7.200S:- Heard Shri C.R. Sahu, couns^ Panel Lav/yer for the State/respondent By this petition, the petitioner| (Annexure-P/1) whereby he has Abhanpur to Primary Schooi, Sadar Learned counsei for the petitii| also a teacher v/ho is 'working at Tuta] family has been separated and as pe| the Government employee i.e. husbaf one place. Thecefore, learned coutt petitioner may be allovi'ed to make a i]i he be directed to decide the same, to no objeotlon. Having heard Isarned courisel| and CTcumstances ofthe case, and ofthe case: the prayer made by team^ reasonabie. Therefore, the petitioner i^ along with a copy of this petition to r| within a period of 10 days from todayl the representation of the petitioner w] receipt of the representation, in an points raised bythe petitioner, in accoj With the direotion aforesaid, th| Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.27| Parties are entitled for certifiedl Rload )1 for the petitioner and Mss Dipali Pandey; te, on advance copy. |has questioned the order dated 7-7-2006 transferred from Primary School, Tuta, I, Aarang. fsner submitted that the petitioner's wife is on aocount of this transfer the petitioner's the Government Po'icy as far as possible ^d and wife are supposed to be posted at [sel for the petitioner submitted that the feDresentation to the resoondent No.2 and Which learned counset for respondents has team^d +i'iitci41-i tii^cil ffte1^t<Ri«i< ^siRriTan^r for the parties, having regard to the facts w|thout expressing any opinion on the merits counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and aliowed to make a detailed representation r^spondent No,2 raising all his grievances |and in turn, respondent No.2 shall decide jthin a period of 30 days from the date of c|bjectlve manner, after considering ail the Mance vvith law. i| petition stands disposed of. 144/2006 also stands disposed of. |copy of this order. Sd.<- L.C. BheelBO Judge P.T.O.