^ K E'-~! i^S fs, .S-z ^i BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. <2-elU-£. Contemnt.Civil No. ^ (L/2— Of 2010 ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTNo.l \r "^"^w" RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR Gajanand Thawait, Agedabout 50 years, S/o. Dr. D.P.Thawait, R/o. Dayalbund, New Gurudwara, Dayalbund, Bilaspur Tehsil and District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Versus T. Mohan, the Regional Manager, BMEL limited, Sirigitti, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. r~° -g8«. -HC-22 an^r^ h-u'h sn^i 5h^ict? +if^ff '\^-' y ?ST •^1<41<'1''1, a'aly'i®,(»l<ll'M>j.< 3ni(?T XT5W .M^& *n*RfT sn*iich 31)^1'5^'IW^fta S.B: HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA Md 03.02.2011 Shri H.B. Agrawal, Senior Ac] counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsgl for the petit authorities are not complying with t| 23.4.201 OinWritAppeal No. 51/2010; On the last date of hearing, le^ granted time to seek instructibns with| by the Supreme Court in the S.L.F^ counsel for the petitioner fairly sub| Supreme Court has passed certain in| 'ti'iilri'fl'f wi?if'? feizt ^n^re ^aiPgiisn^i HAN SHRIVASTAVA, J. vocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, ioner submits that the respondent ie order passed by this Court on irned counsel for the petitioner was regard to the orders, if any, passed filed by the employer. Learned riits that on S.L.P. preferred, the terim orders on 18.10.2010 and the matter is still pending. In this view of the matter, at tt)is stage, 1 am not inclined to issue any notice to respondent. Petition, therefore, is-dismissecl Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge