IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9285 of 2008 Date of Decision: 26.5.2008 Narottam lal and others Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Shri Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral By filing this writ petition, the petitioners claim that benefit of additional increment, granted to them earlier, has wrongly been withdrawn. It has been stated that case of the petitioners is squarely covered in their favour by a ratio of judgment of this Court in Om Parkash and others v. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.18601 of 2006, decided on 10.4.2008. Counsel for the petitioners heard. Perusal of the paper book indicates that necessary particulars with regard to all the petitioners have not been given in this writ petition. However, by taking note of ratio of judgment in the case of Om Parkash (supra), we dispose of this writ petition by directing respondent No.3 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the same by passing a speaking order. Ratio of judgment Om Parkash’s case (supra) be kept in mind when passing any order. Petitioners are directed to supply three copies of the writ petition along with a copy of this order to the officer concerned within 15 days. Thereafter, necessary order be passed within four weeks. (Jasbir Singh) Judge May 26, 2008 (K.C. Puri) gk Judge Civil Writ Petition No.10574 of 2007(O&M) 2