..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2008 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.147 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2008 Shri.Jitendra Zapsu Pasi. ..Applicant. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, 2. Shri Harilal Ramji Darod. ..Respondents. .... Mr.B.W.Kakade, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar & Mr.H.J.Dedia, APPs for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 25th September, 2008. DATED : 25th September, 2008. DATED : 25th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Criminal Application No.147 of 2008 is not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board as the connected matter i.e. Criminal Revision Application No.225 of 2008 is on board. 2. The applicant has preferred Criminal Application No.147 of 2008 for compounding the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. 3. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. ..(2).. 4. By judgment and order dated 8th June, 2006 the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 13th Court, Dadar, Mumbai in C.C. No.2243/SS/2005 convicted the applicant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed. Hence,this Revision. 5. During pendency of the Revision, the parties have amicably settled the matter. Hence, this application for compounding has been preferred. In view of the settlement between the parties, the offence is compounded and the applicant is acquitted therein. Bail bonds of the applicant shall stand cancelled. 6. Criminal Revision Application and Criminal Application No.147 of 2008 are disposed of in above terms. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)