Crl.M.No.M-25033 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-25033 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 9, 2010 Sahid and others .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Navneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.G.S.Sandhu, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the complainant. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.302, dated 4.6.2010, registered under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 34, 506 IPC, at Police Station Nuh, District Mewat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. A coordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion on 27.8.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.Misc.No.44612 of 2010 Heard. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.Misc.No.M-25053 of 2010 Heard. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in respect of the offences mentioned in the FIR, the complainant, who got lodged the same, has already entered into the compromise with the petitioners. Crl.M.No.M-25033 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion for 7.10.2010. In the meanwhile, in the case of arrest of the petitioners, in the FIR mentioned in the petition, they shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer subject to the following conditions:- (i)They shall join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. (ii)They shall not offer any threat, promise or inducement to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the same to the Investigating Officer/Court; and (iii)They shall not leave the limits of this Country without prior permission of the Court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that pursuant to the said order, the petitioners have already joined the investigation. It is further contended that complainant wife is still residing in the matrimonial home with her husband. These facts have not been disputed by learned State counsel. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 27.8.2010, granting interim bail to petitioners-Sahid, Deen Mohd., Noorddin, Samina, Akeena, is, hereby made absolute subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 9.11.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge Crl.M.No.M-25033 of 2010 (O&M) -3-