IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No 2302 of 2011 Date of decision: 23.5.2011 State of Haryana petitioner vs Sudharshan Kumar respondent Present:- Mr. Amit Kumar, DAG, Haryana M.M.S.BEDI Delay in refiling the appeal is condoned. The suit of the plaintiff- respondent for recovery has been decreed by the courts below holding that the plaintiff- respondent had been plying his vehicle for the appellant-State @ Rs.7,000/- per month pursuant to the agreement. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that after the said agreement expired, the appellants were liable to pay the respondents at a lessor rate as per the new policy i.e. @ Rs.6/- per K.M. with maximum of 1000 kms per month. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and I am of the opinion that a concurrent finding of fact has been arrived at by both the courts below regarding the liability of the appellant to pay the suit amount. No ground is made out for interference as no substantial question of law is involved. Dismissed. May 23 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE