IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13457 of 2011 BIRENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with complaint case No. 40(C) of 2005 in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner being the tractor dealer to have misappropriated the money of the complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that whole grievance of the complainant is against the bank officer and not against the petitioner but since the complaint was filed in 2005 and cognizance was taken in 2006, I am not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if possible 2 keeping in mind that the cognizance has been taken in the complaint and the accusation appears to be contractual in nature if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned J. M. Ist Class, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with complaint case no. 40(C) of 2005 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)