IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2320 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2320 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2320 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO. OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO. OF 2005 Mohan Rajaram Menkudale .. Applicant V/s Smt.Leela Shrirang Bhute & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.S.M.Railkar for the Applicant. None for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. Perused the Civil Application. By way of Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking the condonation of 308 days delay. The Applicant has stated in paragraph-2 of the application that the decree was passed on 28th October, 2004 and the Applicant had filed an application for certified copy on 3rd October, 2005. The only reasons stated in the application is that the Applicant was not keeping good health and that the local Advocate was in the process of shifting his office. No particulars and details are set out. The Medical Certificate merely mentions that the Applicant was suffering from Hypertension and Diabetes and also suffers from Osteoarthritis. The aforesaid Civil Application does not appear to be bonafide. No sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. Hence, this Civil Application stands dismissed. 2. In view of the disposal of the Civil Application, the appeal also stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)