t/^ ' ^^?, ^^M^w ^ ^^M^i ^^iyyu: ydiC^ ^) JBEFORETHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P (C) No.^^ of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS :y Heera Singh Sahu, S/o_Shri Sadaram Sahu, aged about ^O years, R/o Hrishabh Nagar, Baijnathpara, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^"•A. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Law and Legislative Affairs Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) '.-•"w^. .^ ^'y-;:<<€^"" <- 2. .r^^ ^•'y^" ^•\^v" ^' \^?I.-""' :^" The Additional Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Law and Legislative Affairs Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District & Sessions Judge, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^.. iS^...lA^-—.-.-—.—.-.-.-—.-— .^^ ./'^•'% f & j JS^ ^s ^ ^ ashok ^ HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION (0 N0.6987 OF 2009 Heera Singh Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondent. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 18th day ofJune,2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 24/10/2009 (Annexure P-1) has been passed without assigning any reasons. The dispute involved in the present case is squarely covered by the order dated 16/11/2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 5363/09 (Mahanand Mishra Vs. State of C.G. & Others). 2. Shri Kachhawaha, learhed Dy. Advocate General appearing for the respondent submits that the present case may also be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Mahanand Mishra (supra). 3. In view of foregoing, having regard to the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the present petition is similar to that of Mahanand Mishra (supra). Accordingly the petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 24/10/2009 (Annexure P-1) stand quashed and the State/ respondent is directed to consider the case of the petitioner on its own merits, in accordance with law and pass appropriate order. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge