1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE WRIT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.315 OF 2009 Navnath B. Lugade & Anr., .. Petitioners V/s. Regional Joint Director (Sakhar, Pune Division, Pune) & Anr., .. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 317 OF 2009 Sambhaji S. Lavate & Anr., .. Petitioners Mumbai & Ors., V/s. Regional Joint Director (Sakhar, Pune Division, Pune) & Anr., .. Respondents. None for the Petitioners. Mr. S.N.Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1. CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED: 22nd September, 2009. P.C. 1. None for the petitioners when called out. 2. Dismissal of petition in default results into filing an application for restoration which is normally allowed. It ultimately creates strain on the Registry. Therefore, we, ourselves, went through the petition. srj/- 2 3. Heard learned AGP for the respondent No.1. This petition is filed against Show Cause Notice dated 15 th September, 2008, issued by respondent No.1 on the basis of the complaint filed by respondent No.2. 4. The petitioner is permitted to file reply to the Show Cause Notice before respondent no.1 and take appropriate proceedings, if required. 5. This Petition is, therefore, dismissed as premature, with no order as to costs. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) srj/-