1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 39. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No.30/2010 (ARUN BHAGWANRAO PATIL V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Vivek V.Ingale, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. D.V.Tele, AGP for respondent (sole). ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:11-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. The dismissal of Land Reference No.391/2004, by order dt.29.2.2008 is questioned by the claimant. The learned Counsel Mr.Ingale submits that the absence was not deliberate. It was only loss of communication between the Counsel representing the claimant and Advocate not keeping track thereof. 2. Considering the issue involved, the order of dismissal of LAR No.391/2004 under challenge is set aside. However, the 2 claimant shall not stake claim for intervening period, from 29.2.2008 till 11th Feb.,2010, for the statutory benefits arising out of the award, if it is decreed. Learned A.G.P. to communicate this aspect to the learned Special Land Acquisition Officer concerned. Civil Revision Application allowed in above terms. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/30-10cra