IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 82 OF 2006 ( Kisan Sukhdeo Lokhande vs. Shri Eknath Dawale ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 01, 2008. Heard Shri Patil, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Parihar, AGP for the respondent. The grievance of Shri Patil, Advocate is that though specifically directed in para 21 of the judgment dated 12.03.2004, the respondent has not initiated any selection process. The learned AGP invites attention to reply dated 20.10.2006 to urge that because of subsequent staffing pattern and establishment schedule, the post itself has ceased to be available and as such there is no question of undertaking any selection process. The affidavit-in-reply clearly shows that the respondent is not in a position to initiate the selection process. In any case, it is for the employer to decide whether to fill in any particular vacancy or not. No case is made out. Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE *GS.