IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 183 OF 2005 DR.SARANG KANEKAR,SANQUELIM GOA. ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA,THROUGH CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. M. S. Joshi, Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2. Mrs. A. A. Agni, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Coram:- D. D. SINHA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 1st December, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. Sonak, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kantak, the learned Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2 and Mrs. Agni, the learned Counsel for the respondent No.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the cause of action in the present petition has come to an end and hence, the petition has become infructuous. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. D. D. SINHA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.