IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.24944 of 1999 Between: M/s.Chandralok Hotels Limited, Charminar Cross Roads, Hyderabad, reptd. by its Managing Director M.Chandraiah, S/o.M.Sayanna, R/o.Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Bldgs, Hyderabd. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of Certiorari Calling for all the connected records including the impugned proc.No. 25923/11/96-17 M.A. dt.13-8-99 ad set aside the same by holding that the said proceedings suffers from vide of arbitrariness, discrimination, unreasonableness and it lacks ratio-decidendi and further declare that the petitioner is entitled for conversion of his land situate in survey No.52.A and 53.A an extent of 6314 sq.yards from recreational zone to commercial zone as permitted in the case of others vide G.O.Ms.No.345 M.A. dt.19.7.85, G.O.Ms.No.291 M.A. dt.25-7-90 and G.O.MS.No.518, M.A.dt.6.12.95 and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: SMT. KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 20.06.2008, none appeared for the petitioner nor there was any representation. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner nor there is any representation on its behalf. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for default. No order as to costs. ___________________ JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH 4th July, 2008 IBL