:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1209 OF 2008 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1209 OF 2008 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1209 OF 2008 IN IN IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 405 OF 2003 COMPANY PETITION NO. 405 OF 2003 COMPANY PETITION NO. 405 OF 2003 Andhra Bank ..Applicants (Orig. Petitioners) vs. Silver Line Technologies Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Cyrus Ardeshir i/b. M/s. Pandya Gandhi & Co. for the Applicants / Orig. Petitioners. Mr. A. H. Golchah i/b. M/s. Siganporia & Dalvi for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2008. DATE : 7TH AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . It is an admitted position that by an order dated 20.9.2007, the petition was allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (f), however that order was to come into force after two months. That Order would take effect since the Company had paid up the amounts due to the petitioners within the period stipulated in that order. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Petition is allowed to be :2: withdrawn. 2. It is obvious that Notification dated 29.4.2008 is issued by mistake, it is therefore set aside. 3. Company Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Company Application is disposed of accordingly. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)