,d'"T'>a^ ^F' 't-- t. ^"•"L Ii..?'^^ ^? n '^'''^t' ^ .<^'1"' l;-<.'<r-'" ^ Corai PETITIONER DIVISEON BENCH KHENTU RAM BANSOD,AGED ABOUT - 35 YEARS, SON OF RAM BANSOD. BY CASTE - BANSOD (SCHEDULE \. TRIBE) R/0 VILLAGE - ALOLA, P.S. - KAPU, DISTRICT RAJGARH (C.G.) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH - THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTME11 .!••^TRALAY D.K.S. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAIGARH (C.G.) 3. STATiOM HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. KAPU (DHARAMJAIGARH) RAiGARH (C.G.) 4. MALIK RAM SAHU, SON OF MUNU RAM SAHU, R/0 - V1LLAGE - ALOLA, P.S. KAPU (DHARAMJAIGARH), DtSTRICT - RAIGARH (C.G.) 3ABU LAL SAHU, SON OF MUNU RAM SAHU, R/0 VILLAGE - LABED, P.S. - KARTALA, DISTRIGT - KORBA r^ '.<->., PARDESHt RAM SAHU, SON- OF CHHITKI RAFt4 SAHU, R/0 VILLAGE - - BAKARUMA, CHARKHAPARA, P.S. DHARAMJAlGARH, DISTRICT ^AiGARH (C.G.) ^VRiTPE" •ye' ••r: w' Present: Shri R.K. Keshanvani, learned counsel for the petit'oner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, iearned Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. lih The foii (24tn March, order of the Court was oassed Laleev GU! L^arned counsel for the parties are heard. 2) Petitioner - Khentu Ram Bansod fiied this writ petition in the year 2005 for the following reliefs: 3*) "A. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus direeting the respondents to produce Ku. Laiita Bai before this Hon'ble Court. This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to issue any other writ/yv'rits, order/orders, direction or directions it msy deem fit under the racts and circumstances." ~he petitioner, thus in substance, was seeking issuance of f Habeas Corpus to.the respondents for production of her missing daughter Ku. Lalita Bai before the Court. 4) The respondents in their counter affidavit and the affidavits filed thereafter have categoricaliy stated that inspite of their repeated sincere efforts to trace out the petitioiner's missine laughter Ku. Lailta Bai, she could not be traced out so far though 'the person projected by the petitioner in his First Information Report responsible for taking away his daughter Sai forcibly, was arrested by the poiice. La'it; 5) On due consideration, the Superintendent of Poiice, Raigarh is directed to continue to make sincere efforts to trace :::,-^^x lf!"!TK*i. out the petitioner's missing daughter Ku. Lal'rta Bai and not to submit a final report and ciose the matter in haste. 6) With the above direction, the writ petition stands tertified copy ofthe order as peuyies. subbu Sd/- chiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge