c.-4 RESPONDENTS: ..<^ J^d^ \°>^\ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT QF JUDICATURE IN THE MATTER OF W.P. No.2^3.rff/2004 PETITIONER: M/S VIKAS CONSTRUCTION THROUGH PROPRIETOR SHRI BANWARI LAL SANWLE, SON OF SHRI AMAR LAL SANWLE, AGED ABOUT __ YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE 8s POST JANJI, TEHSIL MASTURI, DISTRICT BILASPUR [C.G) VERSUS THE EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA) THROUGH THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR (C.G.) THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7-A OF EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS & MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952, SHRI BIBHISHAN PADHAN, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR [C.G,] STATE BANK OF INDIA, THROUGH THE MANAGER, P STATE BANK OF INDIA SARKANDA, BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT ^ ..^' ^^" 'sy .-"r.-.;"^\ .^" ^\'.,:'^>'\ 2. f ^fq[9t^ ~7 XI-HC-22 CT^T^T f<rli°b 37lt?T 9b^IGh yf^a ^' <\ ^ -g^r ^||^|<VI<L|, ^ni^^Ko, f^<ni^^< 3ffi^T XR^? ^W<f{\ ^qlcb--^ "•—•••*•'••••••*•** ••*'"^^ 2001 'l^^y' 11^1 ^«11<9< tll^O 20.09.2004 On a xxiention being aaaad^ Kzi.Sutiita Joxa, couixael AppUcation for Heard. urgciit hc^riaig tlhe xnatter is taken ixp. ^or the petitioner(e), isi aUowad, petiti^ner b^mg fhey |ore at pijeseiit tfa|s compe^ent " It is stated fhat the undcr Exnploycca Providcnt Act, 1952. Leamed counsel foi Bmployees Provident Fiind labourers/employees are not are ia ga^eat difi&oully and fhey further submits fhat for the an. opportuiuty of ffling Kespondettt 110.2/ttie considexed on. its own xaerite ixx! Having considercd and the nierits of tte caBe^ ia the o^ wtU be seived iT a dut;clloii i» deteiled wpresentetion no.2/the competent autiiority fhis order, wifhia 10 days, fhc coxnpctent aufhoniy of thc by a reasoned order on its owil eaity as possible prsferabfy of tfae reprcsetttatioii. It is reixiaiae, tihe portiee including avaflable under the law. Wifh the aforcsaid dlsposed o£ Con^queHlly appMcatio4 disposed of, C.C. as per rules- Filmd raisin|g andloa witi^si matte cbl^id^'l "RTPRTf ^ f^t <^i'^i< '^^ti^Ra'n^T is a contmctorwho is covered and Mi»ccUefficou» Proviaiona the petiticmer submitt^i that tfae A^cousit has been seized and fhe paid their dues, as sucJbi fbiey |ore at fhe verge of etcyrvation. She the petitioHers may be givea detsaled reprcsentation befor& aumorliy, whlcli shaU be |sK?coxdance with Isaw. ^ifhout expressing QSIJ opinion 011 |>mioa of this Oowt, eiids ofjiisticc jgtveu to tlie petltloxiera to maMe a grievances befom respondent a|oiig wifh a copy oftt®petltion. a&d such reprcsaatation beii3g fited, ^cspoxidcnte »halldccidc fhc semie merite in accoTdance witii law as 4 weeks &'om the date of recdpt clear tbat if any gnevaD.ee stiU ^be petitioner tnay avail tifcie rexxxedy ob^er/atiaEsiS, this petitioa stands for iaterua ^ relief a3so staiMls Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [xfr0^fe^