$nglg‘ agngh O Ws \~ , W \ k ............. RESPONDENTS )‘d‘cd $t—I 9a? “WW“ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ty+ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE _._________-__.____..__._.._——.—-—-——-—-— NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITATION CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OF ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. 1. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONER :- As Stated in the cause title above. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BITASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No4 Lgl OF 2005 /S.K.Mishr:%g%égagguwf§%yca:v occupation P G T / A , , . . . (Physics),posted at Kendriya Vidy'alaya, Bilaspur, resident of 1457 /I Wireless COLONY< Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG) . g3 [.)/> v\{KV 5" gAA < ....... X Qu" ‘atg/L‘ ——————————— PETITIONER 9;“. , awn wewaggé i“. .......“.5 ima \,\ 0\ VERSUS The Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of U.R.DI, Department of Education, New Delhi . ‘2. The Assistant Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Jabalpur, Tahsil and District Jabalpur (MP). /3. The Education Officer, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Officer, Jabaipur, Tahsii and Distsrict Jabalpur (MP). /4. The Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Bacheli, Distsrict Dantewada (CG). The Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Biiaspur,Tahsi1 and District Bilaspur (CG). Smt. R.Leela Bai, Principal, Kendriya Vidyalay ‘l Sangathan, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distsxict Bilaspur (CG). / W sel for the peu'tioner. Shri Shailendra Soni, co Shri Vinay Harit, Standin Counsel for respondcnt No.2 to 6. Heard learned counsel f0 the parties. Learned counsel for Iesp ndent Nos.2 to 6 at the outset submits that this Court has no jun‘sd' tion to entertain this petition, as the petitioner being an employee o Centxal Government has to approach the Central Administrative Tn'b a1 for redressal of his grievances. t The petitioner is work'm as PGT (Physics) teacher at Kendn'ya Vidyalaya Bilaspur since 9.4.20 2. However, vide order dated 9. 12.2004 the petitioner has been tempor 'y attached With Kendriya Vidyalaya, Bacheli and as per the case o the petitioner he joined his duties at Bacheli on 13.12.2004. The after, the petitioner has been relieved from Kendriya Vidyalaya Bac 1i on 4.1.2005 but he has not been allowed to join his duties at Ken riya Vidyalaya, Bilaspur. Learned Standing Couns l for respondent No.2 to 6 argued that in View of the judgment of th Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangath V. Subhash Sharma reported in AIR 2002 SC 1295 the appropria Central Administrative Tribunal. In this matter the Hon'b e Apex Court has held that “Kendriya Vidyalaya is an autonomous body registered under the Societies Registration Act and controlled‘ y the Govt. of India and that being the position the Administrative Trib nai has jurisdiction concerning service matters of the employees of the endriya Vidyalaya in view ofsub-ciause (iii) of S.14(1)(b). Kendriya Vid alaya is aiso inctuded at Item 1_V_o.34 in Forum available to the petitioner is XI—Hc—22 . ‘ @CK‘ Wm www.1té/Qn... in 200 W...‘ War Waite WW mammaha mwawm awm 7.4.2005 XI-HC—22 M