IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7761 of 2009 DR.RANJIT KUMAR, S/o- Ramjiwan Kumar, resident of Beena Nursing Home, Pokharia, Near S.P. Office, District- Begusarai :--- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, NAMS Building, Ansari Nagar, Mahatma Gandhi Marg (Ring Road), New Delhi- 110029. 2. The Executive Director, the National Board of Examinations, Ansari Nagar, Mahatma Gandhi Marg (Ring Road), New Delhi- 110029. 3. The Director, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bailey Road, Sheikhpura, Patna. (Member of Selection Committee for Institutional Assessment). 4. The Head of Department (Urology), Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bailey Road, Sheikhpura, Patna. (Member of Selection Committee for Institutional Assessment). 5. Dr. Akhilesh Prasad Sinha, the Expert, resident of East Boring Canal Road, Patna. (Member of Selection Committee for Institutional Assessment). 6. The Dean, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bailey Road, Sheikhpura, Patna. (Member of Selection Committee for Institutional Assessment). 7. The Registrar, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bailey Road, Sheikhpura, Patna. 8. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi. 9. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar :-------- Respondents. ----------- 2. 10.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. This writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner for admission in Super Specialty DNB Genito Urinary Surgery (Urology) as he is in the select list pursuant to C.E.T.- SS Examination, 2009. It is further submitted on his behalf that three candidates out of those who appeared in the aforesaid examination were short-listed for admission. Petitioner is placed at number- 2 position. Person listed at number-1 inspite of offer having been given to take admission has not chosen to take admission and the case of the petitioner is required to be considered for admission. In this connection learned counsel for the petitioner refers to the statement made in paragraph 14 of the writ application as also his representation, copy whereof, however, has not been annexed with the petition. 3. In the circumstances, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Executive Director, National Board of Examinations, New Delhi, Respondent No.2 stating the facts noted above and the said representation be considered and disposed of in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within a period of three weeks of its receipt along with a certified copy of this order and if the facts stated above are correct then I do not see any reason not to recommend the candidature of the petitioner for such admission. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)