IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2011 / 19TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21838 of 2011(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- T. ISMAIL, NASEEB HOUSE, PANNIYANNUR.P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, KSRTC HEAD OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM - 695 051. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, KSRTC HEAD OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM - 695 051. 3. THE ESTATE OFFICER, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, KSRTC HEAD OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM - 695 051. 4. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KSRTC, KSRTC BUS STATION, ERNAKULAM - 682 035. BY ADV. SRI. BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.2183/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 17673/2011 DTD. 5.7.2011. P2:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.E.S2-032821/11 DTD. 19.7.2011 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21838 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T The issue in this writ petition pertains to award of tender for the running of stall No.1(old) under the Ernakulam Depot of the K.S.R.T.C. 2. Now the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P2 order passed by the 3rd respondent whereby his claim was considered pursuant to Ext.P1 judgment of this court and was rejected on the ground that the minimum expected licence fee is Rs.90,000/- and that the petitioner's offer was below that. It is challenging this, the petitioner has come with this writ petition. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted if the petitioner makes a revised offer, which is not less than Rs.90,000/-, the minimum decided by the K.S.R.T.C, the respondents are willing to W.P.(C) No. 21838 OF 2011 :2 : reconsider the case of the petitioner. When that suggestion was made the petitioner is willing to make a revised offer. 4. Therefore I direct the petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent and make a revised offer, in which event the 4th respondent will consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders in the matter. 5. Counsel for the petitioner offers that the petitioner will appear before the 4th respondent on 16.8.2011, between 10. a.m. and 11 a.m. Hence it is directed that if the petitioner appears as aforesaid, orders will be passed on the request of the petitioner without any delay in the matter. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge