IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6519 of 2010 RABINDRA NATH BIDYARTHI, son of Late Bhuneshwar Prasad, resident of village-Arrahar, P.S. Dhailoe, Dist-Madhepura. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Magistrate, Supaul. 3. Mr. R.K. Singh, Head Secretary, Block Office, Birpur, Dist-Supaul. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Supaul, District-Supaul. 5. The Block Development Officer, Raghopur, District Supaul. ----------- 2 4.1.2011 The grievance of the petitioner is that the vouchers and records have not been properly checked by the BDO Raghopur, and therefore, Government money to the tune of Rs. 95,935 /-has been wrongly shown as lying with him. It is submitted that the petitioner has already filed representation before the District Magistrate Supaul, for re- verification and scrutiny of the vouchers and records, copies whereof are Annexures 8 and 9. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate Supaul to get the relevant vouchers and records checked by any competent Officer of his office in presence of the petitioner and come to a definite conclusion as to whether the said amount is in fact is due with the petitioner or not.Thereafter, the District magistrate will be at liberty to pass appropriate orders in the matter in accordance with law. Prakash ( J.N.Singh, J.)