IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 19018 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: November 6, 2008 Sadhu Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of direction to the respondents to register Plot No. 263, Block-G, Okhla Enclave, Badarpur on Delhi-Haryana Border, measuring 50 square meters under E.W.S. Scheme, in the name of the petitioner. The aforementioned plot is stated to have been allotted to the petitioner on 8.8.1994 and possession was delivered on 3.8.1996. On 1.8.1996, the petitioner also prepared the draft for a sum of Rs. 2,000/- for the purpose of registration of plot in his name. When the C.W.P. No. 19018 of 2008 plot was not registered in the name of the petitioner, he sent a representation to the respondents on 3.10.2008, followed by legal notice dated 12.10.2008 (P-4 & P-5). However, the needful has not been done. 2. Without going into the merit of the controversy raised in the instant petition, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to take cognizance of the legal notice dated 12.10.2008 (P-5) and decide the same by passing a speaking order. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) November 6, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2