XI:HG—78 'yst "4i'4icf'4, afllyis, fa«iiy>i< *11*1CTI thlicb Wf200 ; 311^1 Wf^tW IWIT 311^51 *t<i* sn^i 'qggr ('j'ilai'^) Writ Petition Writ Petltion under Artid PETITIONER 2. 4. Sonau CrUpta, ;PamgajE( Chainp( State o( Denartibent Raipur| The Bot througy The Colect Jotu Keshart Sukulpj Janjgir^ Pifasad S.B. HON'BLB SHRI DHIRENDJ^A MISHRA.J. 24.07.2008 I Shri Astiok Kumar Shukl^ Shri V.V.S. Murthy, •Dy. Heard. This petition is directed 24th Deceinber 2007, passe^ 57/483/2006, passed by the| whereby the appeal preferred bj aiid the. matter has been reniil) ^piTt^^l^^^ fS^Xf^^R^ ; ^ , r- iR_<*»ffl*t d-H^?l : : (227) N0. 3822/2008 e 227 ofthff'Coastitutionof India Ram ;Gupta, SOD. of Late Kashi Ram leautenffbf Sukulpara, Kharaud, Tah. b^ fy0M.: Klsaxaud. Uistt. Jaujgir- 3L^i.:.:;; . • .'. • Versus Cfahattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, of Revem.ie, D.K.S. Bhaweta, [CG] ' | ^rd of Revenue, Chhattisgarli, Dilaspur its PresidiaR Ofiieer sctor, Distt. Janjgir- Chainpa (CG) Kesharwaili, son ofShri Maniram ^aai, caste Baaiya, resident of ^ra., Kfaaraud, Tah. Pamgar, Uistt. [Champa (GG) counsel for fhe petitioner. Aldvocate General for the State. ^gainst the order of Anaexure P-3, dated in Revenue Appeal No.A/06/R/A- respondenf No.2/Board of Revenue, the petitiouer.has been pgrfly allowed ted to thfeAddition'al CoUector, Janjgir- XI-HE—78 's^l •^wivi<i, 'sr<!h'w'i<o, P^viwy. HWCTI fliHieh """""" ""'"""""""""Wr 200 ^i^'n^K ('i'it^q't'O ' sii^iwWN? ?WT 3n^?T ffi'tiw J> ^CTWHftSariSI 2- Chauia wifh a'lBirectibh t6 cond on inerits. Leanied counsel for the section (3) of Section 49 of fhe ! .feietj-.is.si-oatoxgoS .' .'„:?: lej'eaiaiiteEA&all be referred to rt"BT'SC®3CT"'WTOTrSr '~ nQtcpinpeteiiLtsto remand tbe addititiaal ofSeGllion Lea:med"icoiuisel for th( 'petition^'may be disposed ofwr ehhattisgarii/respondeut No.2 investigation or reGordiai in viewofsuH-section (3) Kearaed'cQunsel for fhe petitioais disposed ofwitli the £ Iri view of fhe subinissioa instaat ^petitiou is disposed of'n Chliattisgarh/ resplaidenf No. 2 ajresh ia view of sub -sectid ceiiid'uctm.g investigation or re^ thiak aeeessaiy. of'wtifh *l'i|fci4'1 fmCT'ifTsiS <r»it$K ^ SifOT OT^H [ict iaquiry and decide the matter afi'esh tietitioner submits that ia view of sub- Phliattisgarh Laad Revenue Code, 1959, ^s 'the Code'), fhe Boaid of Revenue was mAtter to the Additiorial CoUector. nespQndent/State subuuts that this (h a direetion to tfae Board of Revenue, to deeide the inatter by conductmj eyiderice, as it inay thi&k necessaiy .49oftIieCode. . Ipetttioner also has no objectton if the ^foresaid direction. Ipfleanied coiuisel for fhe petitioner, ttie a direGtion to the Boai-d of Revenue. to decide/the appeal of fhe petitioner <a(3) of Section 49 of the Code after |:prdm.g additional evidence, as it inay Sd/- DtiirendraMishra Judge