•^;:-^...'^ k.fce"^ 1 l^ ^^t^ •Ss d" Respondeats HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petitioa (81 No. 2327 of2009 Petitioxier LaUu Lal Shrivastava (L.L.Shrivastava), son of Late Gaya Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 61 years, retired Draftsman, residence of vUlage Jalaso, Post Saaiartaal via Koni, District BUaspur, Chhattisgarh. -Versus- 1, State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Sccretaiy, Agricultare Departnieiit, Dau Kalyaa Siagh Bhawaa, Raipiir, Chhattisgarh, 2. The Accoiintaat General of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distorict Raipiir, Chhattisgarh. 3, Joio.t Director^ Agriculture, Ainbikapur Division, Ambikapur, Clihattisgarh, 4. Deputy Director, Agriculture, Anibikapur, Distdct Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, 5, Assistant SoU Conservation Officer, Raiiiaaujgatij, District Sarguja, Chhatdsgarh. (Writ Petition imder Articles 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) Sin^le Bench : Hoa*ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri C. Jayaat K, Rao, Advocate for flie petitioner. Shri Arviad Dubey, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1, 3, 4 aad 5, Shri Jami1 Akhter Lohaai, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on this 5th day of May, 2009) This case pertains to grievaace of non-grant of retiral dues/pension. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on msfa'uctions, submits that tiie matter may be referred to fhe pension coininittee. This Court, m the matter ofW.P.No.4642/2004 (Baynath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers) aad ofher connected matters, directed fhe Committee to consider fhe matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were mvolved. The Committee was constituted by tiie State Gtovemment, pursuant to fhe order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 •^.-" ^tf^^es: 6. (Snit. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Goveraraent of Chhattisgarh and ofhers), aad order dated 13.3.2008 passed ia M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Maadal aiid aaofher). Thus, fhis petition is squarely covered by fh.e judgment aad order dated 31st Jaauaiy, 2008 passed ia W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baljnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed counsel appearmg for fhe parties. This petition is accordiagly disposed ofia the sam.e temis i.e., fhe office of fhe Advocate Geueral is directed to send fhe case to the Conimittee, wifhia a period of 15 days firoia fhe date ofreceipt ofa copy of fhis order as well as a copy of fhe petition froin the pe^itioner. Thereafter, fhe Coraitiittee shaU issue notice to fhe petitioner aad officers conceraed withm a furfher period of 15 days, The Coininittee shaU consider aad pass order, ia accordaace wifh law, after affordiag proper opportunity of heanng to thie petitioner, The petitioner aad fhe ofiicers conceraed inay file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, iacludiag payraent of retiral dues, tf aay, to fhe petitioner, be coinpleted wifhia a period of four inonths froin fhe date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of fhe petittion to the State counsel for traasferring the same to the Committee. In case of grievaiice with regard to non-payment of pensionary dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before fhis Court direcUy. The representation/appUcation can be nioved before tihie Pension Committee, as stated above. The Pension Committee shaU not refuse to entertam the representation/appUcation, if so filed directiy. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge