1 CR.APP.NO.1525/2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1525 OF 2009. 1. Ramnath s/o Baban Nimbalkar. 2. Raju s/o Baban Nimbalkar. 3. Sunil s/o Sahebrao Somwanshi. 4. Balu s/o Raghunath Somwanshi. ...Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ... Mr.K.F.Shingare, Advocate for the applicants. Mr.J.S.Gavane, APP for the respondent. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 30th June, 2009. COURT'S ORDER: 1. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.33/2009, dated 15th April, 2009 of Wirgaon Police Station, Taluka: Vaijapur, Dist.Aurangabad. 2 CR.APP.NO.1525/2009. 2. The applicants are accused of committing riot and attempting to commit murder etc. The accused are also charged under Sections 3(1) (x) and 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes ( Prevention of Atrocities) ) Act. 3. It is the case of the prosecution that on 13th April, 2009 at about 07.30 p.m. The applicants and others launched attack on complainant Dattu Naonath More and his wife. Both of them sustained bleeding injuries. The applicants, except the applicant Balu are named in the FIR as assailant and Balu's name is also mentioned in the statement of the other injured witness, the wife of complainant Dattu. There is thus clear material against the applicants. The application for anticipatory bail is pressed on the ground that on the same day in two different incidents the complainant Dattu assaulted the applicants with iron rod and caused injuries to them. It appears, these two 3 CR.APP.NO.1525/2009. groups had violent clashes during that day and on both sides there were injured persons. The applicants, who sustained injuries, can not be granted anticipatory bail only because they sustained injuries on that day. Their injuries would show that they were participating in the violent incident. Therefore, the applicants are not entitled to anticipatory bail. The application stands rejected. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp.