IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 2980 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: November 29, 2011 Nirmala Devi .. Appellant Vs. Ved Parkash and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the appellant. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The trial court, vide judgment dated 9.3.2006, decreed the suit for possession filed by the plaintiff- respondents. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellant- defendant Nirmala Devi, preferred an appeal which was dismissed by the appellate court vide judgment dated 28.2.2011. Hence this regular second appeal. Having examined the impugned judgments of both the courts below, the same are well founded and well reasoned. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal for determination. Dismissed. November 29, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge