s^f ^t ^w^ ^WT3TT^?T9RW NWC1T <l»*1ict> T^r ^iiqi<nq^ ^Ti1<-i^<o, [®i<ni^^< —^<^?...c.s.2.......SLi.i.%..W^ 200^ ^Tf^T 1iraEF (<^G(i^<i^) '^TTW^ft^T PETmGNERS 1. Smt. G about Tal-isU ] Smt. Kbnila Agecl Nagari,| RESPONDENTS 1. State oj School Bhawan Chhattisgarh, Through, Secretaiy, t^ducation & Tribal DepartiTient, DKS Ralpm' (CGj 2. The Ass Departn' (CG) The Di; District 3. Writ Petitiosi i&iider Articl S.B. Hbn^ble Shri Dhireadri Mishra. J. 16-10-2008 Shri Aray Slirivastava^ Sl-ui PK Bhad-LU-i, PL foi With the consent of the| LeanLied counsel appea|dni initially tiie petitioners were ^ fixed pay of Rs. 100/- for a pij probation period, they were 1 submits that the issue inv^ ^bl^fd^'l 'RTR^ff ^f 1^2t <P»I^K ^3tRrH3TT^T 3ur Soni, W/o Shri Kirtilal Soni, Aged 36 yeai-s, R/o. Melitia, Post Kum'a, sTavagarh, District Durg (CG). Devi D/o Late Baijnath Gupta, .bout 55 years, R/o SUiava, TalisU District Dhanitari (CG) ersus istaiit Commissioner Tribal Welfare .ent, Dhaintari, District Dhanittari ?trict Education Ofilcer, Dhamtari phamtari (CG) ^ 226 of the Constitution of India ^omisel for the petitioners. the State. parties, the matter is heard fmally. nng for the petitioners submits that ippointed as Assistant Teachers on a briod of one year. After completion of h.'aiited regular pay-scale. He fm'ther )lved m tiie mstant matter is also ^[^f^ r g^n^r, <M-ii^iH — FS/197—3/2008—40,000. ^^1^^. ' J S t. ->. __..^y ..f' ••^^~K^/' -;;• t;'^..,. . '^ ,^' ^^•'v.--:-^^-'^ W^T'cRt ^TN? ^WT 3TT^?T sh^ict» ^ ~s^ ^ii^Kn^, ^Til^^Ko, [®icni<H^< , t^fc^} S 9 3C& iTrawsE'iw"""""""""""""""""""""""""^ 200 % ^n^r^^ (yii^^) ^wi^T «Rsa3TT^T 2- eilititled whether the petitioners are consequential benefits with appointiiient or after completl The issue involved hert Pradesh State Admhiistratil 2745/89 (Madhukaiit Yadu others), wheretn it was held ai'e entitled to regulai' p^ appointiiient. The matter wa^ Court, where the appeal wasj Court, upholdmg the decisic^ the Teachers/Assistmit Teaclliers from the date of thetr initial at He fm'ther submits tht libeity to rnake a representatl graiit of regular pay-scal^ appointment, pursuant to tl^ the matter of Mtidhukant YacS^ In view of the foregc|ing disposed of in the sanie teif liberty to make a represe^ concenied authorities to coni the saiiie footuigs as per the or»i<if<yt<i1<i *iM<rff ^f 'fe^t <P»I^I< ^^ifiTRsn^r to regular pay-scale and other effect from the date of their initial on of probation period. sm was considered by the Madhya ^e Tribunal, Jabalpur m O.A.No. and 56 others, Vs. State of MP & |that the smiilarly situated teachers ^-scale w.e.f. the date of uiitial s taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme disniissed by the Hon'ble Supreiiie n of tlie Tribmial to fhe efiect that are entitled to regular pay-scale ppoin.tment. at the petitioners may be granted ion to the conceniied authorities for from the date of theu' initial ie order dated 24.8.1992 passed ui (supra). reasons, this petition stands ms i.e. the petitioners are graiited itation, if so advised, before fhe »idertheir case, aad if they staud on Drder dated 24.8.1992 passed in the ^T^t7T ^T 9,^11^, <M-li<Jttci —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. ^, ^^ ^T ^i4» [^?T s»»*iic) (Peff <HT^T St»*l|Cft \ci ~3^T T^i^i<n^, ^nl^^Ko, f®«ni<ri^< j^:^.^......S.3..1.?.s... *<1*<^1 <b*(l<b —""""———•"—"—•"—•""•^ 200 <5 ^n^T Tra^ (<i?(^^) l^TTW^f^f 3^T^T J, niatter of Madhukant Yadi^ confirmed bv order dated 3. in Special Leave PeUtion ((j siniilar relief accordingly. oni^f<n<fli ^w^S ^ fs^ <^i^i< ^T^TRTH^TI^T (supra), which was subsequenUy, ^ 1994 by the Hon'ble Supreme Com't [•ivil] No. 6892/93, they be granted Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 5l^^T ^T 9,^11^, <l^i^lH —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000.