1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.6998 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.6998 OF 2005. WRIT PETITION NO.6998 OF 2005. Dattatray D. Kannadkar : Petitioner versus Pravesh Niyantran Samiti & ors. : Respondents. Mr.A.P.Parlikar with Mr.Tejas Dande for the Petitioner. Mr.Vinay Sonpal, AGP, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr.S.D.Rupwate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED : September 05, 2006. DATED : September 05, 2006. DATED : September 05, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Parlikar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that for the passage of time, the challenge raised in this petition has become infructuous and, therefore, on instructions, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is grated. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Ad-interim order, if any, stands vacated. Civil Application No.3049 of 2005 does not survive. It is disposed of accordingly. 2 2 2 [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [NARESH H. PATIL, J] [B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.]