: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.977 OF 2001 IN S.C. SUIT NO.4362 OF 2008 Mrs.Shakuntala C. Kapadia ..Appellant. Vs. Mrs.Tarla J. Chheda ..Respondent. Mr.Mahesh Menon for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 23RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : This is an Appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai returning the plaint for want of jurisdiction under Order VII Rule 11 of the C.P.C. The Plaintiff’s grievance was in regard to the Defendant disrupting water supply to his flat. Subsequently, Respondent No.2 has purchased the entire premises wherein the suit premises are situated. It appears that Respondent No.2 has not given any cause for grievance as of today regarding water supply. 2. In the circumstances, the Appellant’s grievance on merits stands redressed. The Appeal therefore is academic at this stage as far as the Appellant is : 2 : concerned. 3. In the circumstances, the Appeal from Order is dismissed with liberty to the Appellant to file a fresh suit including on the same cause of action, if necessary, in the appropriate Court. ***