IN TKE HIGHCOURT OF CHHAmSGARH BILASPUR WRITPETITIONfSyNO. OF 2008 PETITTONER ; n^S^. X^^tS> y^s^: tsfy' o-.^-' RESPONDENTS: ^ (^ ^s^^ ^^y ^^ Ram Kumar Maheshwari S/0 late Shri V.G. Maheshwarui, aged about 45 years, Occupation- Assistant Enginner, posted at Munidpal Gorporation, Korba, District- Korba, (C .G.) i' II VERSUS (1) State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan & Development Department, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) (2) Additional Secretary, .Chhattisgarh Government, Nagriya Prashashan and ©eveloRment,D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distrit:- Raipur, (C.G.) (3) Commissioner, Nagi-iya Prashashan, ^aipur, EKjstritit- RSipur, (C.G.) (4) Mayor, Municipal Corpora< Korba, District- Korba, (C.G.) WRIT PE12TIQN UZA_2260FTHE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA ^^ i-c. ^w. HIOH eOURT OF CMHArNSQARH : KLftSPCTR WritPetitionfSt No. 4664af2008 petitioner liam Kumar Mahcshwiari Veisus Respondents StateofCIihattisgaili&othets WRITPE'nTQNUNDERARnGL,E2260FTHECONSTITUTrONiOFaDIA. (SB: Hou'ble Shri Satisli K. Agnihotri J.) Shri AwadhTripathi, Advocate for Ae petitioacr. Shri A. V. SIuMhgr, Paad Lawyer for the respoadents No. 1 & 2. Shri Sanjeet Sttaana, Advocate for ihe icspandent No. 4. ORBBRtttraa (Ftosedonttus 18tildayofPebmaiy, 2010) Heard. Leamed counsel appearing fer tlie pctitiwier subaiits that by order dated 18.8.2QW (Aaaexuie P/l) thfi petltibner was ttausferi^ to Nagar Ptocb^at, laMEiaapiur, treatmglumasSub Engmeer, posted at Munlcqwl Corpoi'ation Korba,. SIud A. V. Slu'idllar, leamed counsel appeam^ for the respondeats/State, rei^mg on fhc avermcnts naade ia paragiaph 5 of flie retura dated 17«b Maroh, 2009, subnuts fhat the uapugaea ordcr mentfomng flie petitioner as 'Suto Bn^neer' luay be a lypographical .mistatee, as Ae petitioncr was pn»nioted on tUe post of 'Assistant Engtoeer' vide pBder dated 20.6.2008 (Aniiexure P/10) aad sinee fh^heis l3ciBg:ficeated:aSytesistan!t En^meer' &r aUL purposcs axid evea lus nanm Ims &imd place jn fhcseiu.onty Bst of 'Assistant En^iaeers', as per tte pcomodon order. - In regard to fhe question of traasfer, liberty is reserved to tbe petitioner to make a representatton before the coimpetait authority, if so advised, to consMer his case ia aecGurian.ce -nllli :! j 1.1 J;!I.E!;;' ^^^s^ss^^^^^^sss. 4. — '2- the piovisions aflaw. tfthercfe-inalice, breach ofstatutcay rules and regiilations or fhe aulliotity passing the order is not conapetent, the samc shall be considered by fhe conoemed aufhority before passiag fhe order oa the representation, if tEtadc by the petitloner. In vicw ofthe forgoiag, nothing i?einaias in ttus writ pefition for adjudication. The petittoa staads disposed of.No oidcr asto costs. Satish K. Agniftotri Judge nukur ^B. Ml