^!^Pi^WORUPEE€ t.--''13"1' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) CONTEMPT CASE (Cl N0. '/ " / 2011 ^ngto Bc^iift^ PETITIONER <? ^J. ^«.t p^f^— SftS^ G.P. Pathak, Aged 68 years, S/o Late Nathuram Pathak, Retd. Asstt. Fisheries Officer, R/o Village Kandarapara, P^^^^^Q^^^ WardNo.>10,Dongargaon, pp2;^^""' _^...."""tMMWW~ Tahsil Dongargaon, 0^^"""''^"^ 1 o -^ U District Rajnandgaon (CG.) VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS 1. Shri D.S. Mishra, Principal Secretary, State of Madhya Pradesh (Now State ofChhattisgarh), Department of Fisheries, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG.) 2. Shri V.K. Shukla, Director, Directorate of Fisheries, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, Now Directorate of Fisheries, Chhattisgarh, Telibandha Road, Raipur. CONTEMPT CASE UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1971. ..•^^^^^^&^..s»~^^^^^^^ '3^';^l<41<rl4, ^Tl1^l<o, (^<11<-J^7 vfw^n w*(i<b o/WI :GQ ^n^TT^w (lioit^<i^) 3H^[ "SRT fqil^ Wff ^^ 50*1W 50*1Icn 'FRHW^f^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shriva pasjsed 12-12-2011 Shri J. N. Nande,counsel for the peti( Heard. It is submitted that the order was No.2778 of 2005, directing the respondents i[ of the petitioner for promotion by holding| observations made by this Court and Circulaf the State Government. Learned counsel foi| order was passed by the Court, repre^ Government, received on 02-08-2010 and c(| the Directorate and copy of the order was als decision has been taken in the matter. The p| 05-03-2011 whereafter he received a memo that the Director requested the Even though, no specific time lim| respondents to hold revjew DPC, the auth| under an obligation to comply with the order Almost one and a half year have lapsed, decided as per the direction of the Court. Considering that no specific time present, instead of issuing notice, it is observ absence of there being any specific time limi spirit. In case, the direction ofthe Court is not months from the date of receipt of a copy of the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the With the aforesaid direction, the i government to| expedite ! petitioin ^p^^ -^^' ^•-"^••: ^^Tf^-R -^ itava. J. oner. 1 on 19-07-2010 in Writ Petition (S) the writ petition to consider the case a review DPC in the light of the t dated 27-02-1975 and 02-05-1990 of the petitioner submits that after the tentation was made to the State ^pies have already been submitted in (o annexed thereafter, but till date, no stitioner had submitted a reminder on ^04-05-2011 ofthe Director showing thematter. was fixed in the order, directing brities of the State Government are bf the Court within a reasonable time. |3ut the matter has not been finally lirliit was given by the Court, for the <ed that the order of the Court, in the jt, has to be complied with in its true jcomplied with within a period ofthree |is order, which is now being passed, ibetition. js finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge (^-^ ^mTq^^^g^TRw,u^rNwr—FS/i40—2/2011—1,50,000.