IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 17890 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.02.2011 Sanjay Narula ....Petitioner VERSUS The Chief Administrator, HUDA and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Batra, Advocate, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner had earlier filed a suit to challenge the rate of interest, which was decided in his favour. Appeal was also decided in his favour, which has now been challenged by the respondent-HUDA by filing Regular Second Appeal before this Court. Whatever the plea the petitioner has to take, should be or ought to have been taken in the civil suit, The petitioner cannot be permitted to invoke the remedy of writ Court to seek the manner of payment. The petitioner will have to raise all these pleas before the Civil Court. The writ petition is totally misconceived and is, therefore, dismissed. February 22, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE