.I‘GH .COURT. OF CHHATTI-S6ARH AT BILA5PUR €h.M.?.N&;496 a? 2607 - A "33: honme N’w I P 5mr‘ma J Narendm Kumnr Jain; 510 Shvi Bhikham Chand Jain, Aged abou’r’40 years, Rfo Near bevshr'ee Tafkies, Dhamfari,’Tahsil as; District Dhammri (6.6.) Vs‘ Nan—apsaiigan! Smite 9f Chhcm'isgabh Through Palica S‘I’g‘l’lon Dhamfam Dis‘h'ic? Dham'l'ari (r6) (PETIHON UNDER SECTION 482 OF €r.P.C.) Mr- P R Pmanknr counsei fur The apphcm‘r Mr Pankag Shrwasfava P L for fhe msponden‘r/S‘l'afe ORAL ORDER (Fussed 6:17“ Névember, 20%) This pe'ri‘rinn is directed against the. order da‘red 1.8.2007 pas$ed by *ha Addifin‘nai Sessions Judga, Dhammri, in Criminal Qevision Na.31/200? affirming 'fhe order dafed 23.6.2007 passed by the Judiaia! Magistmie Fir-sf Class Dhammri in Criminal Case No.260/2007 wherehy ‘Hne learned Judicml Mumstm‘re Fir-31' Clas¢ reJecTed +h9 upphcafton for interim cus‘mdy 0* aileged 730 +ms of qoya ml 2. The arder is chniiznged on we gmund fhe‘r witlriouf ‘Hnere being subsmni'ia! cause, fhe caurts below have rejected the appiiaafién of {Hz pei’ifiener fer inferim custody of aileged 730 tins 9f 5mm. ail. 3. I have haard learned counsai for Tim par*ies and peruced fin? ordar 0f i Tudicwi Magistrafv Firs+ Fhass, Dhammri a: aiso ‘H'w 0rder impLgmd 4. Learnad calmsel far +h? pe‘hfiorier submit‘: “that m’ pres»? Tm tins of ‘icvo ml Is iaymg in ohen niace at Police Siam"! *From 2006 The all is parishabie i‘rem and as a resul'i' of rust and ofhar- Things i'i wili des+my . Learnzd counsei fur‘i‘her submH's thzri ha is readv and wiHmg +0 mka m+emm H ”(1.. cuswdy and. ready To give imder‘l’aka fha‘!’ ha will no? use aind wii! keap the articles in safe custady till The final disposal Of ‘the case- er till] furiher directign of this Cnurt. Learned cnunsel placed relianca in The mailer nf Saadsr Ehai Amba La! Dwei v. stairs 9f 9J3m?‘ in w, ichit has baan held by The, Apéx Cour-t ‘Hm‘r The proggrfy shauld no? be kept in palice station for lang time, the matter relaiing ta The p’mper‘ty should. be decided as early as passible. Learned counsel also submits that presen‘rly offence relai'ing ‘to Section 7/16 af The Prevention. of Faed Aduliemtion Act 1954 (hereinafter refer-red To as ‘ihe Act 1954’) has beamdelefed by the cour‘re below and - only ”the case agninsi' we presem' upplicani is secticns 420 and 272 0f fhe Indian Pena! Cede. Leer-vied counsel elso'SUbmi‘rs fin? qniy 3 eonfeiners have been sent for chemical aneiysis and oil wa‘s‘ feund substandard which is nail l ddui‘i‘em‘red; Learned ccunsel fer 'i'he applicant also, submits The? awarding ‘ro report of analysis fine alleged er‘ricle 0f food is sub-smnderd but nof eduli'em'l’ed or injuries to health. 5. 0n ihe o‘l’her hand crder imgugned is suppnr+ed an behalf 0f the State and submn's The? *his is not a complaint case of interlm cus‘l’ndy ef Tine r r‘l'icles and m This case er'hcles seized which was primary feed for the human consumption was faund sub-smndard Le. does nof confirmed The Sfmdcrd which is adultorm’ed in acrordcmce wifh ‘Secfion 2 (i) (a) cif ihe ’ ' Ac? 1954 and selline or storing 'the adulfera‘red food Is punishable under Sections l 420 and 27? of +he Indian Pencil Code ‘6 ' According to The case of The presecution 730 tins of 5mm oil have heen selzed hv +he police Ou‘r of sewed ar‘hcles 3 ranminers have <en+ for. hemical analysis which was examined by fhe chemical analvsr and found that arfieles does no? confirmed the standard. Same is adul‘iero‘l'ed ar‘hcle wiihm the meaning of clause l andtm of Secfion .2 (i) (a) of ’i'he Ac‘l’, 1954 and adul‘rerai‘ed ar'hrle canno‘i be permi‘i‘fed for sale therefor , if canm'r be alven in an interim custody Learned courts below have reJeefed the appliea'l'ion of +he pe‘h‘rioner on ‘H'ie ground Thaf seized ar'l’icle Is properi‘y sf criminal ease and prime fade ddulfera'ferl ma'rerials (commodi‘hes) I do no+ K\ ml; AIQ 2003 SC 638 V. L 'l find any Illegalr‘l'y or mflrmrry m The arder Impugnod Th» Tr'a! cour‘f h refused 'm give adulfemfe arhcles m an Infemm cus‘mdy 7. Consequgmly, I d9 nef find any substance in ‘Hna pefi‘rion and The sama is liabi? 1'o be dismissed and itris herebv dismissed. However, the frial cour'r is dirz'cfed to expedite the triad as early as possibie preferably within a period of 3 yiionfhs from ‘l'he dam of filing of a capy of This order on behalf of the applicant / a sm- a.