.^•': ' ••• -^- ••w DwtSionBench ^^"^5 2 IN THE HGiN'BLB^IIGH G©®R'r<»F JUDIGATURE AT BmASlWR.CHHaE'I''I'iS©ARH WRITAPPEAKNO. OF2007 APPBLLANT/: (Petitiorter) ^^v'. ^M!^\<^" ^iW^" ...^•'"^s1^" ^^^',.^:': \ }'••"' x .•••' vs^"" RB8PONDENTS: .J'^^ ^ ^J^l :.^?^^i^ ^i^y^ ^y^^ - -\"<? NoraeshwarVerma,,': S/Q Shri B.R. Verma, • Aged about 20 years, Qccupa.tion: Service, •^ Presently posted as Patwan iri Patwari Halka Na.88,. Fandai-bhatfa, Sub-TeIisil:. Dharsiwa, Tehsll: Raipur, R/o Near j Pragati;, Nagar Tum, Raipiu- (C.G.); i -VERSUS-1 . .: , 1.,.; .' '• 1;. .State of Chhaitisgarh, Througfethe Secretary, : Department pf Reveiiue, . D.K.S 'Bhawati, Mantrala^a, . , Kaipur(C.G.) . -i, / Cpmm.issiQner, " ' Land Rec6r3s, : : Sfate 6f GhhattisgarK, ..Eaipur (C.Q,) •.;,..:- ;'.- 3. ' Collector, Raipur, . ^ . .District: Raipur (€.©.):; 4.: , SuB Divisional OHi(?er, ;. ^ .^ : Reveniie,Raipur.(Ci(3.),;^,i- :5; 5','jBKunestTwar.y'erina^ |: ^ |i;. T.,'i-';B/QJ;',Not^..;:|^own^l';jtQ^\:^^ ' 1 petitioner^ ^ | •. •Qasuiiaatiojn!; ./SeFvice,:|prese:Eiily,past^d^jas' •.'Pafwafi,; ., :iPa.Nran^ > i M^jlsa.1 . No.§8, Dharsiwa, ^pstlrfst: :.,1';:;/:' :Raipur:<C.'G:)':;::.: ;.^ "1 • . '- '.'• ' ..'• ' •'... . '.' :i.:"...; •:. '•". 6. •;•! Jitetldra-I£i.imar:Siiffia,j ::';! -:^ ? 'S^oJNot terLQwn to|; flie; '.'.; ,'• ',• pgtiti6:!-Eer,i'y1. ['woift!ang:>;1:f: j&s. ^^Patwart,!:i;,'^Patwari||,|^M;aj^a ::^^',^N0.4Q^.j'jGTotei-a^ ;^'y. -:J Tel-tsil;:;; NIa;tnpur -• ^.njOon-eiaflbt' 'l>:i ^' mentioned in the order as Manpiir) Tehsil: Gariaband, Raipur (C.G.) : '~—~~ WMT APPEAL imDE» SEXSTION^^ 2^ GHHATTISCrARH HIGH^ G^ BKNGHtAGt'. 2006; - \ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARI-t AT BlLASPUR DIVISIONBENCH: HON(BLE SHRI I. M.QU&ISUSI & HON'Bl.ESHRl PRASHANT ICUMXridtlSMRA; JJ WRIT APPEAL N0 244 OF 2007 ADoellant/ Petitioner Respondents Vs Nomeshwar Verma State of C.6. A others \^ ^ Present: Mr. Sunil Tri()athi, Aclvocat®for fhie oppcstlflint. Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, 6ovt. Advocate for the respondents. OKAL JUD6MENT (Possed on 7th April. 2010) I.M. Quddusi. J; 1. Heard. 2. This writ appeal has been fjjled ggainst thte orcter doited 08.08.2007 passed jn W.P. (5) No.4619/07 wh^rsby the learned Single Judge has jdiSfflissied the writ petitjon filied by the petitioner/appeKant herein against his transfer. 3. During the pendency of .thejn^tant wrjt appeal, jnteriin order was granted in favour -of the appellant pn 6.9.2007 and on the strength of said jnterjm order, thfe S^it appellant 15 still working as Patwari of P.C. No.88, Pandorbhatta, District , Raipur. 4. No doubt that the transfer is one of the exigencies of service and an employee cannot challenge the order of transfer if it is niade in normal course. 5. From perusal of the impugned transfer order it appears that as many as 84Pafwaris wepe tran^ferred in which name of the writ appellan* wds mentjpned dt 'Sr. No.44. Sirice thi^ writ appellant Jias enjoyed the interim wrder for quite^ sufftcient time, we are not incljne to albw the writ a^ r posted at one place for jndefinite periori, thews'fOre, w® dispose of this writ ffipp<sal with ja directjon thiat ^ &ovemnient may takp o fregh dscision wgoi'ciiiig pos'l'ing j!>f the writ app^llant as we think tbot thft J^ate^^^^^^^^^ have made ^ni? pth^r arFffil^f^Mt&^of.p^ where the writ a^e\\anf jiw^ irwsf^Ked i^d ^Sf^9f^^ case the writ app^ljigint ^ is reli^yed, the^re nifiy ,be further cpmpljcgtion rsgardJng jiBji'gn^j)^ J'he.^etitioner a-t' .syjeh place. ^ Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- prashantKumarMisfara Judge