Crl. Misc. No. M-12717 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-12717 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 21.01.2011 Simarjeet Kaur & Anr. ..........Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Simarjeet Kaur and Balwinder Kumar for issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect their lives and liberty and to provide security, as they apprehend threats at the hands of respondents No.5 and 6. Notice of motion was issued to the respondents 3.5.2010 and while issuing notice of motion, it was also mentioned that in case the petitioners approach respondents No.2 to 4 setting out their grievances as mentioned in the petition, respondents No.2 to 4 will look into the allegations and consider the same in accordance with law. In response to notice of motion, reply on behalf of respondents No.1 1 to 4 has already been filed and the same is on record. Crl. Misc. No. M-12717 of 2010 (2) As per reply, petitioners have got recorded their statements on 11.7.2010 before ASI Avtar Singh that they are not apprehending any fear from respondents No. 5 and 6 and they do not want to take any security. Statements of the petitioners are annexed as Annexures R-1 and R-2 wth the petition. Learned counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from ASI Avtar Singh submits that after recording the statements of the petitioners, no complaint has been received from respondents No.5 and 6 and in view of the statement made by the petitioners, the present petition has become infructuous and may be dismissed as such. Ordered accordingly. However, it is made clear that in future if there is any such apprehension, the petitioners may make their grievance to the official respondents and if any such complaint is made by the petitioners, the same be looked into by keeping in view the allegations mentioned therein and necessary action be taken on the same in accordance with law. January 21, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No