THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.12396 of 1995 DATE: 10-11-2006 Between: A.Machareswara Rao ….. Petitioner And 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Kakinada and another ….. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.12396 of 1995 ORDER: This Writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus from this Court to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s case for appointment as Record Assistant as per G.O.Ms.No.69 dated 18.2.1987. G.O.Ms.No.69 dated 18.2.1987 required persons, who were appointed on an adhoc basis and on daily wages during the strike period to be given preference in matters of employment. Sri D.Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that, despite repeated reminders, while the petitioner has not been given appointment, several other employees pursuant to the interim directions of this Court have been appointed giving them preference as required under G.O.Ms. No. 69 dated 18.2.1987. Learned counsel would place copies of some of appointment orders issued to other employees in this regard. It is necessary to note that none of these details are referred to in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and neither are those persons arrayed as respondents herein. It would, therefore, not be appropriate for this Court to examine this question. Sri D.Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner would submit a detailed representation, enclosing copies of the several orders issued in this regard, to the respondents and make a request that he be similarly treated and appointed either in an existing vacancy or in a future vacancy, upon extending to him the benefits which had been accorded to similarly placed employees. It would meet the ends of justice if the petitioner is permitted to submit a detailed representation in this regard within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the respondents are directed to examine the said representation in detail and pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law, keeping in view the provisions under G.O.Ms.No.69 dated 18.2.1987, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the representation. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. However, in the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. _____________ 10-11-2006 asp