HIGHCOUIfF OF CHHATTISGARH AT BjELASPUR WRTT PETmON fS^ No. 4901 of2008 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Banshilal Kiirre Aged 56 years S/o Late Sliri Rani Rataii, Ocoupation - Service, Working as Deputy SupCTintendeirt of Police, A.J.K. Criiiie (Relieved) Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. \rERSUS 1. State of Chhdttis^arh, Throu^ Secretary, Govenitiient of Clihattisgarli, Depafttitettt of Home (Police) Mantralaya, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director General of Police, Police Headquai-ters, Raipur, CMiattisgarfa. 3. Inspector General ofPolice, Raipur Raiige, R^ipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Superintendent of Poli^ District Rmgaih, ChhattisgaA. ^ WRIT PETmON UNDER AR1ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTriUriON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Agnihotei,,]?, Present: Shri R.S.Mariias, Advo<»teforthe petiti<aier. Shri Y.S-Tliakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respoad@rrts ORALORDER (Passed on 05m day of September, 2008) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearme fimlly. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instrwtions, submits fhat tiie petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits at tius stage. However, JOae respondent authorities may be directed to consider and deeide fhe pending representation dated 01.09.2008 (Annexure P/6), m accordwce with law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate Oen^al for flie State/respondents submits ttiat there is no reason asto why the representation of fhe petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Thalair sutanits ftat the ^sr-\ v -2- above-stated representation shall be considered and decided by Ae concemed authority, in accordance with law, on ite owa merits, within a period of two weeks irom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Slsri lliakyr furtfier subniits that no coercive steps shall be takerL till the dispc^al of tht rq)resentation. 4. I hope and tmst that the State Govemment shall examine the representation objectively m accordance with law and guidelmes, i^sued by tfae Govensmerts timetotime, 5. In view of foregomg, the petittion stonds Asposed of. Ne order aste costs. Consequently; I.A. No. 1; application for stay^ also stands dispwed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ajsut