1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.13074 of 2011 CHANDRAN @ CHANDRASEKARAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CR NO. 289/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.V.JEGANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A2 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.09.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 294(b), 323, 436 and 506(ii) IPC., in Crime No.289 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the occurrence has been taken place on 11.09.2011 and a case has been registered against three names accused and others and the petitioner has no way connected in the alleged occurrence and he is in custody fro 12.09.2011 and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that a case has been registered against three named accused and others and some of the accused were arrested and enlarged on bail. He further submitted that they cause damaged to the tune of Rs.2,000/- and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for the dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 11.09.2011 and a case has been registered against three named persons and others and some of the accused were arrested and enlarged on bail and the petitioner is in custody from 12.09.2011 and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following stringent conditions:- (i)The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.289 of 2011 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District. (ii)On such deposits the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District; and (iii)The petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 29/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, DINDIGUL 4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.V.JEGANATHAN Advocate SR.No.34462 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13074 of 2011 Date :29/09/2011 TR : 03.10.2011: 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/