IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3493 of 2011 Anirudh Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 2. 08.09.2011 The informant petitioner has filed this petition for cancellation of bail which was granted by the learned I/C Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada vide order dated 04.10.2008 in Sirdala P.S. Case No. 73 of 2008 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The main contention of the petitioner is that after getting bail vide the impugned order the accused has been threatening the petitioner and the witnesses and as such the witnesses has been assaulted and abused by the accused opposite party. He has further contended that due to fear of the accused the witnesses are not coming forward to the Court in the case and secondly the accused have also committed offence punishable under Section 341, 323, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner has also instituted a case vide Sirdala P.S. Case No. 65 of 2009. The learned counsel for the State submits that the bail was granted to the petitioner on 04.10.2008 more than two years have passed and secondly the petitioner may file petitions before the learned trial Court for canceling the bail bond of the accused if the accused are tempering with the evidence or threatening the informant. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, it appears that contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is fair. Considering the facts and circumstances, this petition stands 2 disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition before the learned trial Court if the accused is interfering with the courts of justice and threatening the petitioner or to the witnesses. If such petition is filed before the learned trial Court, he will taken steps in accordance with law. Saif /- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)