mgn 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.2678 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.2678 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.2678 OF 2006 Mr. Abdul Razzaq Abdul Qureshi..Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. S.S. Joshi, for the Petitioner Ms. Kiran Bagalia, for respondent No.2. Mr. V.M. Phal, AGP for respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 22ND DECEMBER, 2006 22ND DECEMBER, 2006 22ND DECEMBER, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. The contention of the petitioner is that they had two structures and as such the respondents are bound to make available to them two units instead of one. 2. On behalf of the respondents, the learned Counsel has produced the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy for Mumbai Urban Transport Project. In terms of that policy in respect of the commercial area the free component is 20.91 sq.meters and any additional area to purchase in terms of the said policy. Considering the above it will be open to the petitioner to make a representation to the Competent Authority and it is for the Competent mgn 2 Authority on scrutinising the material available to pass appropriate orders. The representation to be made within two weeks from today and the Competent Authority to dispose of the same within eight weeks after giving an opportunity if sought for by the petitioner. With the above observation petition disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J). V. MOHTA J).