IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28861 of 2008 PAPPU RAI @ DHARMENDRA RAI, son of Sri Om Prakash Rai, resident of village – Nakta Diyara, P.S. Digha, District Patna ……. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …… Opposite party ----------- 03/ 11.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 363, 376 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He is named in the First Information Report along with Subodh Rai, the main tormentor of the victim girl. Petitioner is alleged to be an active accomplice of the said Subodh Rai. Allegations are also corroborated in the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl. In the circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail. This application is rejected. He is, however, at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in jail custody. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)