IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-10280 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 7, 2010 Baldev Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.D.S.Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.93, dated 15.7.2009, under Sections 323, 324, 34 and 326 IPC, registered at Police Station Bholath, District Kapurthala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he was armed with datar and he had given datar blow on the head of the complainant. As per MLR, complainant had received three injuries. Injury no.1 was subjected to C.T. Scan and as per medical opinion, the same was found to be grievous. Co-accused have already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail. No accused has been arrested in this case. Hence, in view of the fact that serious injury has been attributed to petitioner-accused, i.e., datar blow on the head of the complainant, which was found to be grievous, petitioner is not entitled for extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Baldev Singh, for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed being devoid of any merit. 7.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge