IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL MCC REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 1061 OF 2008 IN WPMS NO. 1426 of 2007 Geeta Sheikhar Tatha Parmarth Niketan …….Petitioner. Versus P.O. Labour Court & another. …..……Respondents. Mr. Ravi Babulkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Raizada, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 2/Review Applicant. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1. 19th September, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of present application, review applicant / respondent no. 2 has prayed for reviewing the order dated 24.7.2008, whereby the matter has been remanded back to the Labour Court to decice the issue afresh in the light of law laid down in the case of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board Versus A. Rajappa and others reported in AIR 1978 Supreme Court, Page 548 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the aforesaid order. 2. Taking into consideration the prayer as well as the reasons disclosed for reviewing the judgment dated 24.7.2008, the judgment dated 24.7.2008 is clarified to this extent that since the matter has been remanded to the Labour Court, the Labour Court shall decide the issue as per the direction made in last paragraph of the said 2 judgment without taking any observation made above in the judgment to be binding. 3. With the aforesaid clarification of the judgment dated 24.7.2008, present review application is disposed of. (P.C. Verma, J.) 19.9.2008 Rathour