1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.8352/2004. : : Bhawna Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : : Date of Order 26.8.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Inderjeet Singh for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Kumawat for RPSC. Mr.Shyam Sunder Sharma, Govt.Counsel for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed with two fold grievances. The first grievance is that the petitioner has applied for the post of Lecturer (Home Science) and her name was at serial No.1 in the reserved list and in spite of availability of the vacancies, respondents have not so far given appointment to him. Second grievance is that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have now proceeded to fill up such posts under the guest faculty scheme. The respondents be directed to fill up the posts on regular basis against available number of vacancies. The respondents have contested the writ petition and submitted that the originally advertised two vacancies of 2 the post of Lecturer (Home Science) have already been filled up by the main list and, therefore, there was no occasion for requisitioning the name from reserved list and the petitioner cannot claim any right to appointment. It is further contended that guest faculty scheme has been abundant by the respondents and no appointments were made pursuant to Annex.4. In view of above, the grievance of the petitioner on either of the counts does not survive. Learned counsel for the respondents at this stage submitted that certain posts are still available. If that be so, the petitioner is free to represent the respondents for claiming appointment on the basis of her qualification which shall be considered and decided by the respondents in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid directions. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.39.