IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21251 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ K.LATHA, KULANGARA HOUSE, P.O.MADAKKATHARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. MR. K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT: ------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: kkms/ V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 21251 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 29th July,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the holder of a regular permit operating service on the route Vandithavalam-Thrissur. Set of timings issued, was challenged before the STAT which had remanded the matter under Ext.P1 order to consider the feasibility of avoiding staying time in Kollam. The original authority rejected the petitioner’s representation. This was taken up before the STAT in a revision petition. That was disposed of under Ext.P2, wherein, the respondent was directed to consider the petitioner’s request afresh after giving an opportunity of being heard in the matter. Ext.P2 was produced before the respondent on 14.7.2008. But nevertheless, it has not been complied with, it is alleged and hence the writ petition. 2. Having heard the Learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to pass further orders pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment, as W.P ( C) No. 21251 of 2009 2 early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment Writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 21251 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No. 21251 of 2009 4