WP(C) 3981/2008 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. B.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. J. Singh, learned Sr. Standing Counsel, Railways assisted by Ms M. Baruah, learned advocate. The petitioner has approached this Court making a grievance against the order assed in Eviction Case No.EO/MLG/554/08, in terms of which he is required to vacate the railway land under his occupation. The land is Rly. Plot No.50, Pl an No.T/6/08. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in terms of the statement made in the writ petition, submits that the petitioner will be given 6 (six) months’ time to vacate the land in question. Objecting to the same, Mr. Singh, leaned S tanding Counsel, Railway submits that the Railway land is required for public pu rpose and the railway cannot afford to allow 6 months’ time to vacate the same. Considering the above, this writ petition is disposed of with a directio n that the petitioner may be allowed to occupy the land in question till 30th No vember, 2008, on or before which date, he will vacate the land. With the above understanding and agreement, the writ petition is dispose d of.