INTHEHIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETmONNO./??^^ /2006 PETITIONER .1,'V .1 M.GOPALKRISHNAM!URTHY;S/O.LATEM. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER,PRAVASANDHRAPATSHALA, .^:^^^ '^ v>' ,'-.'^' .-•"~ ^fi^- '^A^^S^^-^' STEEL NAGAR CAMP - I, BHILAI DISTRICT ^ DURG(C.G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH --THROUGH SECRETARY.SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTNIENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN,RAIPUR(CHHATTISGARH) HEADMASTER, -PRAVASANDHRAPATSHALA.STEEL NAGARCAMP-1,BHILAI,DISTRICT- DURG(C.G.) RESPQNDENTS ..r'^iva^-o^1. £C-^^^^^^,^._. ..'^: "::2. Cl£R& ^: /^<3:BA^TOB WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THECONSTITUT10N OFINDIA The petitioner humbly begs to submit as under:- ^ m*t0^sew uvq *o i<u<si4, y-rfl*i4i<i, R<AiiMy<( ' \^^ |^o-^|o^. ^F^ZOO 3n1?Ttram(^l:g^) SII^fMfelt® aaiTsii^tiraTO •fcl'!lfo<i)') fl'Wl'^'fel^l -ifSl^K ^aif^Han^f 4-4-2006 Shri Anoop Mozumdu', counajet for the petttioner. Siri Wnay Pandey.Panet Um^er for the State. Heord. Leamed 'counsel for the pe'(iffoner submits that uncter Rule 33(i) of Chhatti^arh Ashosl(iya|Shikshtm &nsth<in (AAiycyako TiBrt+ia Anyo Karnxichdriyon Ke Vettfno Ka SanAya) Atlhlniyam, W7S, •the petittoner is entil'lett to get tti^ beflefits whert the ffovemniort- 9rant is behg giveri to the scflpe comsponcUrg eategoriea of employees in©overnmenteducatio^alinstituttons. On the ottw haml,: leapned submits thof the petittoner has [couisel oppeuing for the State, stniightuway filed thte peWion iiithout serving notice for <temtm;l ^fji»tic& In that viewr of the nwtter) Shri Ataztimdcr, leomed coimsel for the petitioner, pwys •that th4 petitioner may be permitted to make a detaited representatton b^fore the competent auttority of the respondents,trfilehshallbe lconshterod on its own merits in accordance wtth law. The prayer is not oppoMdijy the other dlde. Hwirg considered wtd i»(th|oufexpressing cny o^nwn on •the merits of the cese, in the ojNnlon jof this C<wrt, enda of justice urill be served if actlrection is given +4 •fhc petitioner to mdw a detdled ^epresentation nridig hia gri4vonces before the competent SP/FS/2065 l^ ^flO^^ffW ^TOR.-q i<»iw<<,unD<H<i<a, Rd y^ ^f l^)^/o(> ^.200 ^i^T^raii»(^fg^g) an^CTTFfiat^ crarsti^rgitiw c Sowri 8a?ITSR^(T 3II^?T 2-- <bwfo4)Tf «fi*i<.>r^i^i<a•(RI^M ^gif^TSD^T lority of ttie respondenta tdong itith o w^f of the petitton and lis order, Nfi'thin a perfawl of one moi^th, ond on such nipresentatton flled, Ihe eompetent authority ^>f the respondent»ahatldecide ic soNne on its own merits In ac^ordance (»ith law »»early as Ipossible prefcniblyirithmu periodof|three months from •the date of receipt of the representation. It is i^ade ctear" that'If amy gnevonce stiU rem<ana, the petitioner may owit lew includihg fllingof petitton. With the aforestBd obser^ations, thte petltton stonds disposed of. the remedy awnlabte urtcter the Certified c^>y as per rules. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge SP/FS72005-20;600 ^ ^ ••>; «