IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2402 of 2007 SUDHIR KUMAR SINHA Versus BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ----------- 7 3.9.2008 A show cause has been filed on behalf of the Bihar State Electricity Board stating therein that the Board has considered the grant of annual increments vide memo no.2050, dated 26.8.2008 and the order of the court with respect to consideration of annual increment has, therefore, now been considered and the petitioner’s grievance on this counts stands redressed. In the earlier show cause filed on behalf of the Board the stand was that the departmental proceeding has been concluded and the petitioner has been awarded punishment of withholding 2% of the pension amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order, dated 23.4.2007 this court had directed the Board to consider the grant of super selection grade to the petitioner. However, I do find that by order, dated 19.8.2008 passed in this case this court observed as follows : “Grant of super time scale is another issued which may not be insisted upon at this stage.” In view of the aforesaid observation of this court, the petitioner cannot insist that the Board should consider the grant of super selection grade in the present contempt petition. However, if the Board has not withheld the same in the departmental proceeding, it should consider this aspect on a representation filed by the petitioner. 2 This contempt petition is dismissed as the order of this court has been complied with and this court finds that there is no intention on the part of the Board to disobey the order of this court. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)