IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21177 of 2009 MD.ENABUL @ ANAMUL son of Manjoor Ali resident of village Rampur Nargada P. S. Sadar District- Purnea…. Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4 06.11.2009 Heard Sri Shobha Nath Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is facing prosecution under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Though the petitioner was not named in the FIR, his complicity had emerged only on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Yashin. There is nothing else in the case-diary against him. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that co-accused Md. Yasin whose confessional statement has led to implication of the petitioner, has already been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 6.5.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 6929 of 2009. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that co-accused Md. Asraful Md Mohsim and another Md. Asraful have also been released on bail by different orders, a fact which is substantiated by the computerized sheet attached by the office of this Court 2 along with this bail application. Considering all these aspects, this court would direct for release of the petitioner namely Md. Enabul @ Anamul on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Kadwa P. S. Case No. 68 of 2008, subject to the conditions that one of the sureties must be that of either of the parents or the wife of the petitioner and that the petitioner shall remain regularly present in course of trial and his absence on two consecutive dates during such trial itself would make him liable for cancellation of his bail under the present order. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)