IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41960 of 2008 1. DINESH RAY 2. CHAMPA DEVI 3. LAXMI RAY 4. RAJESH ROY @ RAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 02/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The petitioners are the family members of the husband apprehending arrest in a police case under Sections-304B and 498A of I.P.C. Death has occurred within four years of the marriage. In the U.D. Case lodged by the family of the in-laws, death by poison is confirmed. Whether it be Section-306 or 304B of I.P.C. is hardly relevant at this stage. This Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners 1, 3 and 4 in the facts and circumstances of the case. Considering that petitioner No.2 named above is the wife of the brother of the husband of the deceased with generalized allegations standing in the position of a daughter-in-law herself like the deceased, let her surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon 2 furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand )along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.68/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)