IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35329 of 2009 SUSHIL YADAV SON OF BIDYANAND YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 04/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 307, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that there is direct allegation of firing against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to him even though he is in custody since last three years. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to take all effective steps for production of accused persons including notices for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse by way of absconding. If there is undue delay in conclusion of the trial, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)