IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8418 of 2008. Decided on: 06.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ V.P. Rana and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Pursuant to order dated 25.9.2001 passed by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, the respondent- department has not considered the case of the petitioners for promotion to the posts of Regional Employment Officer/District Employment Officer, which has led to the filing of the present petition. The principal stand of the respondent-State in the reply is that the promotion could not be made owing to rejection of the proposal by the Finance Department. The order dated 25.9.2001 passed by learned Himachal Pradesh Tribunal on the basis of undertaking given by the respondent-State cannot be 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - superseded by the Finance Department. The State in its reply has undertaken to fill up 6+5 posts. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners and similarly situated persons for promotion to the post of Regional Employment Officer/District Employment Officer, as per order dated 25.9.2001 passed by the learned Himachal Pradesh Tribunal, within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of the judgment. The pending application(s), if any also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 06, 2010. (sck).