1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.313 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2010 Heard Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the challenge to the Departmental action on the ground that the same cannot be resorted to by the Management in view of Clause (4) of the Settlement, will not be pressed. That statement is placed on record. 2. Learned Counsel further states that the petitioner will, however, be content if the respondent - Management was to permit the petitioner to engage Lawyer of his choice to espouse his cause in 2 the pending Departmental action. Counsel for the respondent - Management, on instructions, states that the latter request can be acceded to, in which case the argument of prejudice will not be available to the petitioner thereafter. 3. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with clear understanding that the Management would permit the petitioner to engage Lawyer of his choice to espouse his cause in the pending Departmental action. Order accordingly. 4. The petition is disposed of on the above terms. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) sut/JAN10/wp313.10