IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2006 PETITION NO.388 OF 2006 PETITION NO.388 OF 2006 Sharda Prasad Chaudhari ..Petitioner Vs./ The State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. Rajesh Gehani, for the Petitioner Mr. M. More, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. G.D. Utangale, for respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . In our opinion the petitioners are members of the society, which is not made party to this petition. The grievance of the petitioners is that some persons who are eligible have not been admitted. If that be so, it is for those persons to pursue their legal remedy. The other grievance is that the society is not being registered. That issue can also be raised by the society. We find, therefore, no case for interference in the exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)