IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31795 of 2009 NARESH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections- 302 of I.P.C. The submission is that it not discernible as to who fired on the deceased between the petitioner and co-accused Raushan. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert the submission on behalf of the informant that witnesses during investigation at paragraph-28 of the case diary have stated that the petitioner also sat on the motorcycle suggestive of his being the pillion rider, at the “Chowk”. Co-accused Raushan and the petitioner were on the motorcycle with the deceased sitting in between. His prayer for bail is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)