MP -1- WP705_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 705 OF 2011 Shankar Eknath Mali .. Petitioner Versus Kashinath Saidu Kate and others .. Respondents Mrs. Shrivastav i/b. M/s. Consulta Juris for the Petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. THURSDAY, JANUARY 27, 2011 P. C. : By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 7th November 2010 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for review of the order dated 7th June 2010 passed below exhibit-114, came to be rejected. 2. The basic grievance of the petitioner is that the court commissioner, which was appointed by the court, has not carried out the amendment properly and has carried out the same under the political pressure. Under these circumstances, the petitioner had made an application for reappointment of the court commissioner which was rejected. By the order impugned, an application for review of the same has been rejected. 3. The order passed is purely interlocutory in nature. In the event if it is the contention of the petitioner that the report of the court MP -2- WP705_11 commissioner is not correct, it is always permissible for him to challenge the validity of the said report and adduce appropriate evidence in respect of the said challenge. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Hence rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)