$99M WW IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P.(s)No. vikkw /2o11 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE lis ’ l CONSTITUION OF INDIA \ @ PETITIONER :// Hemlal SahJ, Aged abouf 55 years“ S/o Shr'i Cherkar‘am Sahu, 'Head ' \wo ’Qe (/3?’ inifx \ '.. § Mas‘rer', Governmen’r Primary School 4? Saraipaii ( Chechang ) Block Dabhara, \“vix? Dis’rt Janjgir-Champa (6.6.) VERSUS 1 RESPONDENTS : ’ 1. STa‘re of Chhaf’risgarh I /' Through Secre’rary, School Education DeparTmenT D.K.5. Bhnwan, Raipur (6.6.) /, 2. Distric’r EducaTion Officer DisfricT Janjgir—Champa (6.6.) Joim‘ Direc’ror, Treasury, Accoum‘ & Pension Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (6.6.) Block Educa‘rion Officer, Block Dabhara, DisTT. Janjgir-Champa (6.6.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AR AT BILASPUR ‘ WRIT PETITION (S) No. 12464 of2011 PETITIONER :' Hanllal Sahu. VERSUS RESPOWENTS : State of C att1sgarh & Others WRI F PE} 1TION UNDER AR I ICLE 226 1* THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shn Satish K. Agjhog' J. Present: Shrl D R Patel Advocate for the! pet1t1oner ‘ Shn P K Bhadun Panel Lawyelj for the State/respondents ORDER ORAL (Passed on 09 day ofMay, 201 1) f1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeksj i \permission of this Court to Withdraw this petition with liberty to; ¥ ' make a representation 1n the light of Circular dated 13 01 2009 and 0* 01 2011 issued by the Govemment of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department " ~ i, :‘2. Learned counsel appearing for other Side has no obj ection §3. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. x ‘ t However, ifthe petitioners makea representation to the respondent t authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance y with law, on its own merits andperspective. i I i i 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. ,4. Sd/- ‘ if V ‘Satish K Agnihotn a l a Judge Amit l £3» R \\ Wk 11k w-r