a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH : BSLASPUR WRtT PETITION (Sl N0. 5755 OF 2008 PETSTIONER RESR3NDENTS 3. 4. Smt. Usha Panday, W/o Shri Awcthesh Kumar Panday, aged about 43 years, Occupatlon Upper DMsion Teacher, Govt. Middie School, Farid Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Education Department, D.K,S, Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur (CG). District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (CG). The CoSlector, Coltectorate Premises, Distt. Durg (CG). (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri VJpin Tiwari. counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advocate General forthe State. ORDER (Passed on this 25"' day of February, 2009) Shri Y.S. Thakur. Jearned Dy. Advocate GeneraJ appearing for the submits that the impugned order dated 24-9-20C^ (Annexure-P/3) has admittedly been passed without affording opportunlty of hearing to the petitioner. Shri Thakur further submits that the State shall recall the order and the State may be granted iiberty to take appropriate steps after issuing show cause notice and affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law. In view of the above categorical statement made by the learned Dy. Advocate General, according to learned counsei for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudjcation. Accordingly, the petit'ion stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Consequently, pending applicatlons, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge