IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13504 of 2009 AKHILESHWAR DWIVEDI Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & O ----------- CWJC No.13505 of 2009 UMESH CHANDRA PRASAD Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & O ----------- CWJC No.13506 of 2009 PASHUPATI NATH GUPTA Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & O ----------- CWJC No.13507 of 2009 NAJMUL HASAN Versus THE B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY & O ----------- 2. 13. 10. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioners are with regard to after their superannuation from services all the dues including retiral dues of the petitioners have not been settled despite representing the matter. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University submits that in case petitioners file their fresh representations separately stating their claims distinctly, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their pending 2 claims, petitioners propose to file separate representations stating details of unpaid claim before Respondent No. 2. In case, such representations are filed along with relevant documents in support of their claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today, Respondent No. 2 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioners as raised in their representations in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievance with regard to unpaid claim of the petitioners could be settled without delay. With the above observations/directions, these writ applications stand disposed of. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with the reasons thereof. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)