IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2258 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: January 13, 2010. Chemela ...Appellant(s) v. Bachan Singh ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Ms. Rimplejeet Kaur, Advocate, for Shri R.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant(s). Shri Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Despite opportunities, the legal representatives of the appellant have not been brought on record. Moreover, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has specifically stated that possession of the suit property has been taken by the respondent in execution of the impugned judgment and decree. Thus, I find no reason to continue with this appeal. Dismissed. January 13, 2010. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge