IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19108 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SUJEETH G.NAIR, LOWER DIVISION CLERK/BILL COLLECTOR, MUNICIPAL COMMON SERVICE, RESIDING AT 'ASWATHI', MYLAKKAD P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REGIONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL COMMON SERVICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SC, KPSC, SRI. ALEXANDER THOMAS GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).19108/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 25th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner was appointed as L.D.Clerk/Bill Collector in the Municipal Common Service pursuant to an advice issued by the Public Service Commission. Apparently, petitioner had claimed the benefit of extra marks on the basis of his performance in sports. Had it been granted, according to him, his rank would have been better in the list. His claim was considered by the PSC and rejected under Ext.P5 dated 17.2.2003. Petitioner submits that the stand taken in Ext.P5 is incorrect. He refers to Ext.P6 list dated 29.10.2005, which was published by the PSC pursuant to a subsequent selection. In my opinion, the claim raised by the petitioner is misconceived. Firstly Ext.P5 is dated 17.2.2003 and therefore, the challenge is highly belated. Secondly, Ext.P6 was published on 29.10.2005 and no right will accrue in favour of the petitioner on the basis of Ext.P6. Writ petition is bereft of merit and hence dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs