IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 696 OF 2011 SMT. PRAMILA RAVINDRA MARDOLKAR., ... Applicant Versus SMT. SUNILA SAPRA AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr.S.D.Padiyar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. Braganza, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S. Karpe, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. J. Godinho, Advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 24th November, 2011 P.C. Heard Shri S. D. Padiyar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2, Shri S. Karpe, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 and Shri J. Godinho, learned Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 4 and 5. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which stand uncontroverted, the application is allowed. The applicant is granted leave to incorporate the averments made in the proposed amendment at schedule 'A'. Amendment to be carried out within one week. 3. The application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. at*