T THE HIGH COURT OF K1RATAKA AT PAGAIXRE, DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY O JIThE 1998. BEFORE THE HONG BLE MR. JUSTICE CHADRASHEKH RAIAH WRIT PETITI ON NO, 26669 OF 1995, BETWEEN: 1. M/s. A Chamaraju Fni1y Trust, 102/5, 7th A Main Road, 3rd Block, Jayan&gar, Bangalore560 01, By its Trustee 2, The Vysya Bank Limited, (A company registered under the Banking Companies Act), 72, St.Marks Rea1, Bangalore56O 001, Represented by its Asst.General Manager Krishnan aneyu1u, . Petitioners (By Sri N,K 8 Gupta for 0et1ners AND Corooratiori & City Bangalore, Corporation Offices, Bangalore, represented by its Cornirissioner. Respondent (By Sri Muniyappa for respondent) /L/ Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of te Constitution of India with an affidavit praying to the reason stated in the accompanying afidvi that thes Hon’ble Court may be pleased to quash Arinexure—B dated 5. 5.95 bearing No,AEE(SN)61/PO/lO/95—96 issue writ in the mandamus or any other appropricite writ or order of direction, directing t officials its workmen from further demolis.ng structure in the schedule property, etc., This writ petition is coming on for cL’I 1 voyáer this day, the Court made t1 following ORDER Sri Muniyappa, is directed to take notice for the respondent. Accordingly, he apeared for it. 2, This petition is by the petitioner against the order paased by the Corporation under Sec,321(l) (2) and (3) of the Act, The Corporation /3/ has not stated as to which portion of tI bail ling is unauthorised construction and contrary to t1 approved plan. If that is the case, there is rio app1ictiot. of mind by the authority who passed the inigne I order. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed; the impugned notice lated 5.5.1995 (Annexure—C) is quashed and t1 matter is remitted to respondent to consider and dispose of the matter afresh after notice to the petitioner pursuant to the provisional order passed under Sec 321(1)C2) of the Sd/ JUDGE, r. by\ c. by k COPY AssIt*nt Reg1strt ‘4’ C.r4of (.0 /