IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. (T) No. 26 of 2008. Decided on: 27th September, 2010. Satish Khanna and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- Rajesh Kumar and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ None for the parties. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): The present petition was filed, seeking proceedings against the respondents for willfully disobeying the directions issued by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.As. No. 16 and 496 of 1996 vide order dated 16th October, 1996. However, it has come in the reply that payments to the petitioners/applicants stand released on 13th March, 1997 as per the averments contained in paragraph No.-6 of the reply. Consequently, the petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 27, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?