IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22144 of 2008 LAXMAN MALLAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Sunil Advocate for the State : Mr. J.S.Pd. Singh, A.P.P 3 18.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case has been registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been registered against the unknown persons and petitioner has been arrested merely on suspicion. He further submits that though the FIR is against the unknown persons and the informant has claimed in the FIR that he can identify the miscreants still the petitioner has not been put on T. I. Parade. It is stated that petitioner is in jail Since 16.04.2008 and his antecedent is fair. He further submits that charge sheet has already been submitted against him. Learned counsel for the State submits that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Section 392 and 411 as per the paragraph 39 of the case diary vide no. 98 of 2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner Laxman Mallah to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond or Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 331 of 2007 with the condition that one of the bailors must be family member of the petitioner. Kundan (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)