IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.20450 of 2011 Date of Decision.04.11.2011 Arpat Pal Singh son of Anand Pal Singh, resident of House No.2372, Phase-II, Sector 65, Mohali .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Home Secretary to Government of Punjab Civil Sectt. Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-1) is considered by respondent No.2 and appropriate decision is taken. 2. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the 2nd respondent and give a representation as regards his grievance along with a copy of this order within one week. The 2nd respondent shall consider the same and appropriate protection for his life and liberty will be given if the situation so warrants. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 04, 2011 Pankaj*