IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.42044 of 2010 SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR 02. 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, are for breach of an agreement dated 15.9.2007, under which the petitioner was restrained from transferring possession of the vehicle to third person without clearing the dues of the financer outstanding in the name of the complainant. The petitioner denies transfer of the vehicle. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner has forged the signature of the complainant to transfer the vehicle leading to consequent imposition of financial liability against the complainant from the financier contrary to the agreement dated 15.9.2007 arrived at between the petitioner and the complainant. Considering the entirety of the matter, let the above named petitioner surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 130 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)