-l- C^ l oo^L- SINGtl'liNCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATHSGARH ATBILASPUR Petitioner W.P. (S) NO.S^^q / 2006 Smt. Murmi Bai, W/o Bharat Agaria, Aged about 46 Years R/o Aamgaon, Tehsil - Lundra, Dist: Sarguja-fC.O.) Versus Resuondents fc ..•- ^••-^.- ^bl<^>" ^'^•^y^ ^y ''>"" '. ;<-• 1. State of Chhattisgarh < Through - The Upper Secretat^r, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.O.) 2. The Asst. Conimissimier, / Tribal Development Department, Ambikapur, Dist: Sarguja-(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer,/ Block - Limdra, Dist: Sarguja-(C.G.) 4. Head Master Gavt. Middle School,Gagauli Block - Lundra, Dist: Sarguja-(C.Q.) WPJT PETI-TION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 sn^r^r f^iwan^r giirwHfgtT l^. ^^ 35? "yi'Mld-y, aiTflyis, fsidiuy ^.^^s^^ ^^ *(1*1CTI S»>*<1<*1 /^'l, • fa^g an^Tg'Kii^KtrfN' q>rafeft=T Wrat'fffe^ ^FSTt ^isrf^Trgn^r os-os^ooe Shri Arun Shukia, counsel flor the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. ^dvocate for the State/ respondents, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant writ petition nder Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challen^ed her transfer order dated 07.07.2006 (Annexure-P/2), passed by respo|ident No.1 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from S.T. Middl^ Surgujato PrimarySchool, Kunku^ School, Gagoli, Block Lundra, District: , District: Jashpur. The main ground of challen^e is that the petition.er was promoted to the post of Upper Division Teachel' on 05.09.2005 and-She was posted in the Middle School and now vid^ fhe impugned order showing her as Assistant Teacher, she has bee^i transferred to.the Primary School, Kunkuri. I Learned counsel for the petjtioner submits that the impugned order is i!!egal, as the petitioner is | Upper Division Teacher, therefore, considering her as Assistant Te^cher she cannot be ttpnsferred. He further submits that in the circumst^nces the petitioner may be aliowed to make a detaiied representation to j-espondent No.1 and respondent No.1 be directed to decide the same to vl'hich learned counsel appearing for the State/ respondents has noobjectior(. Having heard iearned couns) the factsand^cireumstances of th] counse! for the petitioner appea| Therefore, the petltioner is allowed el for the parties and having regard to ^ case, the prayer made by learned |'s to be just, fair and reasonabie. to make a detailed representation to (ifld^fail) I* XI-HC-22 3^ ^ffsTfvPf, ^fNm?, PK'I i<iy 3T1^7I qT*<WI shKlw E?l ^iacb ^..^..^.^^.^ ,00 £ i^vs sn^r^r f^irosn^T Stl1 (ff?tT Sff^Tg'KII^K qiiqfeffc WRft'ffIWt (f^OTt ^ari^irsn^T •^' Soma respondent No.1 raising all her grfevances, annexing a copy ofthe instant writ petition within a period often No.1 is directed to decidethe sani date of its receipt, considering ail 1 days from today and in turn, respondent le within a period of one month from the :he grievances raised by the petitioner in an objectjve manner, in accord^nce with law. in the meantime, the impugned order in respect of the FJetitioner is stayed, till her representation is decided. With the aforesaid direction Consequently, M.(W.). P. N the writ petition stands disposed of. ?.3111/2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certif|ed copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo (ifi^y^) i*