1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.A.(MD)No.68 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 S.Radhakrishnan ... Appellant Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Enforcement), Madurai Division, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangarajan Salai, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT) (Enforcement), Madurai, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangarajan Salai, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer: The Appeal is filed under under Section 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order of this Court dated 22.11.2010 made in W.P.(MD)No.13804 of 2010. W.P.(MD) No.13804/2010 Prayer : Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the Second respondent in Na.Ka.705/2010/A2, dated 09.11.2010 quash the same as illegal and unlawful and direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner herein to continue as Office Assistant in the first respondent's office as per the earlier order of the first respondent dated 3.9.2010. For Appellant : Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan For Respondents : Mr.R.Janaki Ramulu, Spl.G.P. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR,J.) Mr.R.Janakiramulu, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. 2.This Writ Appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ petition filed in W.P.(MD)No.13804 of 2010 challenging the order of the respondents dated 09.11.2010 transferring the appellant to Bodimettu Kumbammettu check-post as Office Assistant. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.The grievance expressed by the appellant is that frequently he has been transferred, which is in violation of the guidelines issued for effecting transfer of Government servants. The appellant is serving in a transferable post. The appellant is not alleging any mala fide against any particular officer for transferring the appellant from one place to another. The transfer order is issued on administrative exigency. The guidelines issued are only administrative instruction, which has no statutory force. Noting all the above settled principles, the learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the Writ petition and upheld the order of transfer. We are in entire agreement with the said decision given by the learned Single Judge. No case is made out to interfere in the said order. 4.The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is suffering from "Asthma" and he may be given liberty to make representation. In view of the said submission, the appellant is given liberty to make representation pointing out his health condition before the appropriate authority and it is entirely for the said authority to consider the same in accordance with law. 5.With this observation, the Writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (LA) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Enforcement), Madurai Division, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangarajan Salai, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT) (Enforcement), Madurai, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangarajan Salai, Madurai. +1cc Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan, Advocate SR.2394 nbj SR : 11.02.2011 : 2p/4c W.A.(MD)No.68 of 2011 20.01.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/