IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. NO.1340 OF 2009. IN WRIT PETITION NO.4640 OF 2008 (DECIDED) PRAVIN KASHINATH ICHE. VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. Vishal Anand, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. P. B. Patil, Advocate for R-4 & 5. Mr. Khandewale, Advocate for R-7. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M.REIS, JJ Dated : 23rd July, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner, Advocate Shri P. B. Patil for the respondents no.4 & 5, Shri Khandewale, Advocate for the respondent no.7 and learned AGP Mr. Mandpe for the respondents no.1 to 3. 2. The prayer in the application is to direct the Zilla Parishad to implement the G.R. Dated 23/3/2007 and to comply with its promise as given in the reply dated 21-1-2009. Advocate Mr. Patil has stated that the resolution is being implemented and as per law the properties to be transferred are required to be valued. The valuation work has been completed and further procedure in this respect has been undertaken. He invites our attention to the communication dated 7-5-2009 sent by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad to the petitioner/applicant . He states that the respondents no.4 & 5 need time to file affidavit in this respect on record. 3. In view of the facts mentioned above, we do not find any malafides on the part of the respondents no.4 & 5 and hence, we also do not find it necessary to have any affidavit in reply on record. As the appropriate steps have been already initiated and the Schools are to be transferred as on going establishments, we grant time to the respondents no.4 & 5 to comply with the Government Resolutions and to complete transfer till 31-12-2009. 4. In the circumstances, the grievance of the petitioner - applicants has been redressed and we, therefore, dispose of the application at present. JUDGE JUDGE /Muley/