1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1294 /2010 (Aneeskhan s/o Sardarkhan and another vs. State of Maharashtra) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. P S Wathore, Advocate for applicants Mr. C N Adgokar, APP for Respondent CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : 30 th August, 2010. Heard. 2. The applicants were required to furnish details of proposed two sureties who are ready and willing to execute bond in favour of the applicants/ accused. 3. Co-accused have been granted bail vide order dated 27.8.2010 in Criminal Application No.1281/2010. The learned APP objected the bail on the ground that if accused are released on bail, they would jump off the bail as they are Conductor and Driver on mobile duty. Be that as it may; since affidavits of proposed sureties have been filed, which are taken on record, I am inclined to grant conditional bail, as under : The applicants be released in connection with Cr. No. 3051/2010 registered at Mehkar Police Station Dist. Buldana, for offence punishable under sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, upon executing PR bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- each, with two sureties in the equal amount to be provided by each of 2 them ; provided further that they shall attend the trial on each date of hearing ; shall inform their fixed address with telephone/ mobile number, if any, to the I.O. as well as the concerned Court below ;shall not misuse their liberty in any manner and shall not commit any crime while on bail. Application is disposed of. Humdast granted. JUDGE Sahare