1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Second Appeal No.215 of 2009. Panchphulla Tarnath Ramteke v Narendra Eknath Kamble. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Mahesh Rai Advocate for the appellant. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 19th June, 2009. 1. The order granting Succession Certificate as confirmed by the first appellate Court is challenged in this second appeal. 2. The Courts below have upheld the right of husband considering the fact that he is amongst the Class-I heirs of the deceased Mrs. Kiran as the marital status between the deceased and the applicant was subsisting on the date of her death. 3. An effort is made to rely on reported Judgment, reported in AIR 1992 Madhya Pradesh 145, Smt. Krishna Pyari Bai Dixit vs. Gobind Mishra, to which I am unable, agree and against the codified 2 Hindu Law which does not make any distinction in stridhan and property of woman which has become the absolute property and hence. 4. Absolute property  full estate of Hindu woman was freely available for testamentary succession, and in absence of testamentary succession, as one in present case, became open for succession according to the statute. 5. The applicability of section 13 of the Hindu Succession Act is not shown to be excluded. 6. In this second appeal, therefore, any substantial question of law does not arise and the same is dismissed. JUDGE /Muley/