T ^:, S.B. (Service Matter) LN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONtSI N0. 3^36/2010. . PETITIONER: .^^ ^^ J^y ^..y^ Hiralal Vishwakarma, son^of Babadeen Vishwakamia, aged about 62 years, Retired Ranger, Forest Division Manendragrah, Sai^uja Circle,Ambikapur, District Korea, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents 1. 2. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Forest Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ,/^__ _ • . . . _ ': . 1: 2.' Van Sanrakshak, Sarguja Area, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh. 3. DivisionalForestOffieer, Manendragarh, Distriet Korea, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITIONUNDER.ART1CLE 226^0F THE .CONSTrTUnON OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER(S): As nientioned in the Cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT(S1: As mentioned in the Cause dfle. ry^ lilil i —i ^^"l.^lh&i^-'Xti.iEs^aiaia^ IC—78 HWW a»Mr<^ 3^ '*i|4||<?iq, e>Tily'i(s, 'fs<<»i|^^ ^^...J^.£.(&^..'^...'..^.03.^.^0_.. ••Wi. 200 ^ ail^r'q^qT (Tjzifgai^Ei) sn^f 'qii R-ii«b WT 3n^?T ai+irq) % C'WIIW: W^tT an^i SB: Hon'uie Snri Manindra r?iohan^ 29^6-2010 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel for the Shri Vinod Tekarn, Panei L^wyer for the State/respondents on advance copy. The grievance of the petitioner though there exists a scherne of scai Government in the vear 1999 vide Ar not been considered. it is subrriitted eiigibie for grant of scaie promotion ur requiremenis ana aoes noi surrer KW aforesaid pay scaie. It is further represeniations have bsen made by consideration has taken piace. Learnea counsei ror responae law. Taking into consideration the for the parties, in the facts and circurn Xt^.^tl^ . to dispose OIT uiis petition nnaiiyi respondent No.2, Conservator of F| consider the ciairn of the petitionsr arj< 4lI<<I^T<l1l 'HW^lf Tf fe^ <f5i'^I<. ^? aifnH aij^r nriyasiava, >.>. pemioner. ^s ventllated through this petition is that prornotion promaigated by the State Inexure P-5, case of the petitioner has that ihe petitioner is fuli'y entitled and der the sald scheme as he fyiflis ail the any disquaiification so as to deny the submitted that even though severai :he petltioner frorn time to time but no ts subrnits that when such poiicy' has been promalgated, petitioner is entiti^d for consideration in accordance with lubmisslons made by learned counsel itances ofthe case, 1 deem It expedient -1;..- —^.S A--.^..-— Dy issuing aireciiori. Mccoraingry, >rest, Sarguja area, Ambikapur shaii i pass necessary orders with regard to ciaim of the petitioner 'within a period of 3 rnonths frorn the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd-/ . Manindra Mohan Shrivastava -^ Judge