IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH AUGUST 2009 / 6TH BHADRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4766 of 2009() ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10/08/2009 IN CRMP.4631,4651,4633,4652/2009 IN CRMP.4630/2009 of J.M.F.C.-II(FOREST OFFENCES),PUNALUR O.R. NO.16/2009 OF PATHANAPURAM FOREST RANGE, KOLLAM. .................... PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------ VISHNU, S/O.OMANAKUTTAN, VISHNU VILASAM, NEELESWARAM, NEDUVATHUR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.DILEEP P.PILLAI RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI. M.S. BREEZ, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 4766 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of August, 2009 O R D E R When the Bail Application came up for hearing on 28/08/2009, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner was granted bail by the learned Magistrate. 3. At least the counsel should represent the same before the court and get the Bail Application dismissed as withdrawn. Such magnanimity was not shown by the counsel. The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm