IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 159 OF 2008 NO. 159 OF 2008 NO. 159 OF 2008 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1298 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 1298 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 1298 OF 2007 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO. 412 OF 1996 PETITION NO. 412 OF 1996 PETITION NO. 412 OF 1996 BGM Industrial Services ] .. Appellant (Org.Applicant) Versus 1. Papco Investments Corpn. & anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. H.M.G. Murthy - appellant in person. Ms. Kavita Shah i/b A.G. Shah for the respondent No.1. Ms. Devupa Dey for the Official Liquidator. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED: 06TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Perused the impugned order dated 15th January, 2008. It appears that in Company Petition No.635 of 1999, observations have already been made that on production of documents of ownership in respect of the disputed premises, the claim of the appellant will be considered. That was not done and, therefore, the single Judge has passed an order that he is inclined to : 2 : defer the hearing of the application to facilitate the applicants to produce original documents as required in terms of the original order dated 16th November, 2006. It was submitted that the representative of the applicant submitted that the applicant will not be in a position to produce the original documents and, therefore, the application has been disposed of. 3. We agree with the observations made by the learned single Judge. There is no merit in the Appeal. 4. Appeal stands rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [PRASANNA [PRASANNA [PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.] B. VARALE, J.] B. VARALE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]