20. wp 2931-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 2931 OF 2010 Rafiq Abdul Rahman Kazi .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents Mr. Debojyoti Talukdar for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for the State Mr. Ranjeet Patel i/b K.S. Patel for Respondent No. 2 Mr. Prashant Patil for Respondent No. 3 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & M.N. GILANI, JJ. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2011. PER COURT: 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for directing respondent nos. 1 to 4 to register an offence against respondent nos. 2 and 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 384, 506 and 504 of the IPC. The petitioner further prays vide prayer clause (b) to the petition for directing respondent no. 1 for taking necessary steps for the offence punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions from the petitioner that the petitioner does not press the reliefs as prayed vide prayer clauses (c), (d) and (e). 1 20. wp 2931-10.doc 2. The learned APP states on instructions that on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner, the offence vide Crime No. 61 of 2011 punishable under Section 304 etc has been registered against the respondents. In respect of relief at prayer clause (b) to the petition, the learned APP states on instructions that the Local Enquiry No. 5/11/824 has been initiated against respondent no. 2 and after conclusion of the enquiry, action in accordance with law will be taken. 3. In the light of the submissions of the learned APP, according to us, nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition and by accepting the statement made by the learned APP for the State, we dismiss the petition as infructuous. [ M.N. GILANI, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 20. wp 2931-10.doc 3