1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.963/2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1458/2009 Bhogilal M. Kothari. ..Plaintiff -VERSUS- Maa Vision and others. ..Defendants ............... Ms.Sumedha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Ms.M.Shah i/b Pandya Gandhi & Company, Advocate for the Defendants Nos.2 to 5. ............... CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 10th July, 2009. PC:- 1 The Plaintiff and the Defendants Nos.2 to 5 have resolved the dispute by executing the consent terms and arriving at full and final settlement. The consent terms duly signed by the parties and their Advocates are placed on record. The parties are present in the Court and they admit the consent terms to be true and correct. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as “X”. A joint request is made by the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties to dispose of the suit in the consent terms. 2 In the result, the suit stands disposed of in the consent terms. In view of disposal of the suit, the Notice of Motion does not survive and the same as well stands disposed of. A decree be drawn in the consent terms. The Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of the court fees as permissible under the rules. JUDGE kps