IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8900 of 2011 Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Chaudhary Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 27.07.2011 In pursuance to the order dated 26.03.2011, the petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. The petitioner is ready for reconciliation. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that a restitution case was also filed. The opposite party no.2 is apprehensive about going to the house of the petitioner due to his ill behaviour. Considering the stand of the opposite party no.2 and the fact that the petitioner being the student, is ready to pay Rs. 500/- per month to the opposite party no.2 from August, 2011 by depositing the same in the bank account of the opposite party no.2 by second week of every month. It is expected that the opposite party no.2 shall supply her bank account number to the petitioner within a period of one week. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any 2 order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceeding. The aforesaid payment will not preclude the parties to reconcile the dispute. Considering the stands of the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 2208C/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Three consecutive defaults in making payment by the petitioner will give liberty to the opposite party no.2 to file an application for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)