1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2008 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2008 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 418 OF 2008 IN IN IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1139 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1139 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1139 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 467 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 467 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 467 OF 2008 Sudhir Mahadeo Devkar. .. Appellant. vs. Baramati Grape Industries. .. Respondents. Mr. Nitin Kulkarni for Appellant. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. R.G. KETKAR, JJ. R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2009. DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2009. DATE: 4TH APRIL, 2009. P.C. . This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge who has dismissed his application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. We find that the learned Single Judge did not err or commit any illegality in coming to the conclusion that the appellant was gainfully employed on the basis of 2 material on record. Therefore, no interference is called for. The L.P.A. is dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (R.G. Ketkar, J.) (R.G. Ketkar, J.) (R.G. Ketkar, J.)