IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3624 of 2005 ***** Bindeshwari Prasad, Son of Sri Gendhari Ram, Resident of village-Shikhari Chak, P.S.-Mokama, District-Patna. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, “R”Block, Road No.6, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Bharat Wagon and Engineering Company Limited, A Govt. of India undertaking, 26, Raja Ram Santosh Road, Koklata-700 027. 3. General Manager (Finance), Bharat Wagon and Engineering Company Limited, “C”Block, 5th floor, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna. 4. General Manager, Bharat Wagon and Engineering Company Limited, Mokama Unit, P.S.- Mokama, Dist-Patna. …. …. Respondents ----------- 4. 2.2.2009. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner is present. Based on the statements made in the counter affidavit, it is stated that the pension claim of the petitioner has been looked into and sanctioned, which would be evident from Annexure-A and B. Even the pension arrears have been worked out and the petitioner has been informed of the same way back on 10.3.2005 itself. In absence of any rebuttal to this stand or any rejoinder being filed the position is accepted. This writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)