IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.90 of 2009. ARBITRATION PETITION NO.90 of 2009. ARBITRATION PETITION NO.90 of 2009. Kirti Kulin Mehta ..Petitioner versus Ramesh Bansilal Mehta & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Sunil Patel i/b. Sunil & Co. for the petitioner CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 18th February, 2009. DATED : 18th February, 2009. DATED : 18th February, 2009. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that there is some technicial difficulty in drafting the petition and as such he wants to withdraw the petiton with liberty to file fresh petition in the proper manner. 2. As applied, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition after complying with all the technical formalities. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)