CXiURTOrCHHATnSGARH.BILASPUR W.P.(SI iSo.7210 of 2007 PETITIONERS 3 Gokul Rain Thakur, s/o Shri Preinlal Thakur, aged about 39 years, U.D.T., Govt. Middle Scbool, Budhwara, Block Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G). Balu Ram Kothari, s/o Shri Jagdish Ram Kofhari, aged about 39 years, U.D.T., Govt. Higher Secondaiy School, Devkar, Block Saja Distt. Durg (C.G) Chitrarekha Ram Thakur, s/o Shri Ram Dayal Thakur, aged about 38 years, U.D.T. Govt. MMdle Scliool, Bajabbat, Block Beinetara, Distt. Durg (C.G) Ramsaaebi Thakur, s/o SIiri Sarju Ram Thakur, aged about 40 years, U.D.T., Govt. Middle School, Safaaspur, Block Saja, Distt. Dux^ (C.G). Bhagirafhi Dondey, s/o Shri T.R. Dondey, aged about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Prmiary school, Saraugpur, Block Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G). 2 's-- State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department Ministiy, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G). District Education Officer, Distt. Durg (C.Gj. Distnct Education Of&cer, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G). SWrit^Petitipn under Article226 of the Coastitution_of!udia) Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Suinit Venua, Panel Lawyer, for fhe State/ respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (06.12.2007) ,J. Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioners subnuts fhat fbe \'^pctitioners have passed B.T.I. examination on their own expenses, ^- W.P.(S) No.72l0of2007 fherefore, they are entifled to receive two advanee increnients according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subinits fhat ia inaay identical xaatters, the petitions have been allowed in tenns of tbe order passed in fhe case of Yashweint Kuiwar Bharesdwed Vs. Mtnicipal CorponttS.on, Dury an/d MPJ]R-CG96}. He submits that the case ofthe petitioners is squarely covered by fhe said Judgiaent. This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he subnuts that fhe order niay be passed in tenns of fhe said judginent, but it shafl be subject to verification regardtag petitioners' such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed ia case of Yashwant Kum.ar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of fhe facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 01.03.1999 aad furfher whether fhey have been paid two advaace iacreinents or not. The petition staads finaUy disposed of No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /Rciof t-