IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1582 of 2010 Between: Besi Ganapathi ..... Petitioner AND Appana Nepak & another .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M. Ram Mohan Counsel for the respondents: Sri A. Ravishankar The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1582 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is defendant No.1 in O.S.No.20 of 2007 filed by respondent No.1 for recovery of certain amounts basing on a document, which is styled as ‘chit’. When the said document was sought to be marked by respondent No.1, the same was admitted in evidence by the Court below and marked as Ex.A1, subject to objections, against which the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. According to the petitioner, Ex.A1 is an instrument, as defined under Section 2(14) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and therefore it requires to be duly stamped for admitting in evidence. In my opinion, this Civil Revision Petition is premature for the reason that the Court below has marked Ex.A1 subject to objections. This necessarily means that the petitioner is entitled to raise the question relating to admissibility of the document at the hearing of the suit itself. If such objection is raised, the Court below shall consider and decide the same, if necessary, by framing an additional issue. Subject to the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the civil revision petition, CRPMP No.2121 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 24.12.2010 ES