-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No. 304 of 2004 in WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 1762 OF 1999 Bombay Environment Action Group ...Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. K.K. Singhvi, Senior Counsel, with Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No.1 in support. Mr. Shiraj Rustomjee instructed by Hariani & Co. for the petitioners to show cause. Ms. Vidya Bhat instructed by K. Ashar & Co. for respondent No.13. Mr.P.D.Ghandy instructed by Gagrat & Co. for respondent No.23. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: SEPTEMBER 01, 2004. P.C. In support of the Notice of Motion, Mr.V.K. Rao, Executive Engineer has filed an affidavit on 22nd June, 2004, on behalf of respondent No.1. In this affidavit, at Exhibit-1, a statement showing the status of vehicles to be phased out has also been given. It may be pertinent to mention that time earlier given by the court has expired. -2- However, in the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate that time for replacing the vehicles is extended upto 31st December, 2004. Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. -3-