1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 27573 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 01.04.2010 1. Heard Adv. Shri S.P. Sonpawale for the applicants. No one is present for the respondents when called out. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 2524 days in filing Second Appeal. The present applicants are original defendants who are 8 in numbers. There are various age groups and applicant Nos. 1 to 6 are male persons of age between 29 to 52 years, as can be seen from the appeal memo. 2 3. The Trial Court i.e. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kannad, allowed suit for partition bearing Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 1992 on 15.11.1997 and awarded 1/16th share to the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed appeal bearing Regular Civil Appeal No. 311 of 1997, which came to be decided by Extra Jt. District Judge, Aurangabad, on 09.10.2002 and thereby the Court declared that the share of the plaintiff was 1/27th and not 1/16th as determined by the Trial Court. 4. Thus, the decree was confirmed. Thereafter this Second Appeal came to be filed. The only ground given for codonation of delay is that the advocate for the appellant did not inform the appellants/applicants about the decision and only after they received notice of Regular Darkhast on 11.09.2009, they learnt about the decision. The delay is more than seven years. 5. Not being satisfied with the reasons, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. 3 6. In view of dismissal of civil application for condonation of delay, Civil Application No. 15 of 2010 for stay does not survive and it is disposed of as such. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/APR10/ca14.10