WP(C) 88/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. A.B. Siddique, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. P. Baru ah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent No.2, Finance Department. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though p ursuant to various work orders issued he successfully executed the work under th e said work orders and raised bills, an amount of Rs.2,20,563/- is still due and payable, which according to the petitioner has not been paid to him till date. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the ma tter in issue involved in the writ petition has already been answered in Tamsher Ali Vs. State of Assam and others reported in 2008(4) GLT 1 and as such the pre sent writ petition be disposed of in terms of the directions contained therein. In view of the above, in terms of the directions contained in Tamsher Al i’s case, the present writ petition is disposed of. No costs.