IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.13996 of 2010 1. RANJU DOM @ RANJAN DOM son of Shakhi Dom 2. Kamta Dom son of Banarsi Dom Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 08.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not named in the First Information Report nor put on T.I. Parade. He further submits that recovery has been made from the behind the house of Sakhi Dom. He further submits that it is very unlikely that petitioner no.1, who happens to be the son of Sakhi Dom would participate in the occurrence. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, petitioner no.1 is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Paras Bigha P.S. case no. 111 of 2009. The name of petitioner no.2 has come in the confession of Sakhi Dom. He is in custody since 19.11.2009. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.2. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after four months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.) - 2 -