1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2643 OF 2008 Abdul Hakim Khan. ... Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. .... Respondents. Rishi Bhuta for the Petitioner. Mrs. U. V. Kejariwal, APP for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24TH MARCH, 2009. P.C.: The petitioner wants direction from this court that the Police Inspector, who is investigating C. R. No. 504 of 2008 of Saki Naka Police Station should add Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code to the offences as having been committed by the accused. The petitioner being complainant, we are afraid that such a direction cannot be given by this Court in writ jurisdiction. It is for the Investigating Officer to charge the accused for the offence for which he gets the evidence and ultimately it will be for the Magistrate and the trial Court to decide issues like this. The writ petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. 2 2. It is made clear, that we have not gone to the merits of the case as to what offences are committed and what offences are made out against the accused. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. R. JOSHI, J.)