HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6025 0f 2006 PETITIONER Q B ? Chhattisgarh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh, an Association of Clas3—I and II Engineers, duly registered by The Registrar, Finns & Societies, hearing Regn. No, CG/197§ having its registered omce at M-9, Krishna Nagar, Dangania, Raipur (CG) through General Secretary, P.N,Singh§ Superintending Engineer, (STRE), CSEB, Gudhiyari, (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS : l. Union of India through, the Secretary: Ministry of Power Shram Shakti Bhawan, RaiiMarg, New Deihi 110011 2. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Energy, Manualaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Deptt, Energy, Vallabh Bhawans Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh). 4. Chhattisgarh State. Elecuieity Board, having its office at Dangania, Raipur through its Secretary Raipur (0.6.) 5. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board having its office at Shakti Bhawan, Rampur, Jabalpur through Its Secretary, Jabalpur (MR) 6. State Advisory Committee-Elecnieity Board (SAC-EB) Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) Raipur RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon’ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. Present. Shn Mamndra Shnvastava, Sr Advocate wxth Shn Akh1lesh Dalpatl, Advocate for the petmoner. Mr. Bhishma Kinger, Standing counsel for Union oflndia/ respondent No. 1 and 6. Mr. V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondent no. 2 Mr A S Gaharwax Advocate for re<pondent no 4 Mr P S Nan Sr Advocate w1th Mr Vmod Deshmukh Advocate for the reopondent No 5 . . Mr Rajendra Tlwan Sr Advocate w1th Mr. M.I\..Dubey, Advocate for thejntervener’ Shri Ved Ram Verma. ORDER (Passed on 27m day of April, 2007) 1. Mr. Bhishma Kinger, learned counselappem’ng. for the Union of India and the respondent No, 6, on instructions, submits that the notification dated 31.03.2006 (Annexure P/7) has been withdrawn by the the Union of Indinwhich is impugned herein this petition. ‘ 2. In View of the above, learned counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in the matter and the petition is sought to be withdrawn. It is ordered accordingly. D) 4. In View of the foregoing, this, petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge J i