IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 178 of 2009(M) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.35196/2008 DATED 20/01/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ 5TH RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C).NO.35196/2008: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.BALACHANDRAN, HINDUSTAN NEWSPRINT LTD, NEWSPRINT NAGAR, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. MR.A.K.SESHADRI RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C). 35196/2008: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. M.K.SUGUNA (PARTY IN PERSON) D/O.RANGASWAMY CHETTIAR,AZHAKAPADATH HOUSE, NEW NO.10/270,KIZHAKETHARA, VADAVANNUR-678504, PALAGHAT. 2. MANICKAM AND DHARMAJAN,VISWESWARAYA ROAD, SAIBABA COLONY, COIMBATORE. 3. KARTHIKEYA KUMAR AND LALITHA RAMESH, VISWESWARAYA ROAD, SAIBABA COLONY, COIMBATORE. 4. ANBAZHAKAN & VAJAYALAKSHMI, BRG HOUSE, BARGUR, KRISHNAGIRI. 5. BHANABAL, BRG HOUSE, BARGUR, KRISHANAGIRI. 6. C.I.OF POLICE, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD. 7. BAGYALAKSHMI & SHANMUGAM, BARGUR, KRISHNAGIRI. R.P. NO. 178/2009-M: 8. BABY KAMALAM AND BAGAVATHY, MUTHALAMADA, PALAKKAD. 9. KANTHASWAMY, S/O.KITTAR, RAYAPPAN STREET, TATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD. 10. MYILAMMAL AND TAMARAISELVEN, KINARPALLAM PIRUVU, ATYAMPATHY,OZHALAPATHY VILLAGE, PALAKKAD. 11. RAMAKRISHNAN, PANNIPERUNTHALA, KUTTIPALLAM.PO,CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. MEER. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. J.B.KOSHY, Ag.C.J. & V.GIRI, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.No.178 of 2009 in W.P.(c)No.35196 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated 18th February, 2009 ORDER Koshy, Ag.C.J . It is the submission of the review petitioner that he received hearing notice on 20.1.2009. Even though he received the notice, the advocate clerk has omitted to note the posting date. However, we have not made any finding against the review petitioner. If the review petitioner has any points, it is for him to raise his points before the authorities concerned. According to the review petitioner, the writ petitioner surrendered possession and she never returned to the house. That is a matter for enquiry by the appropriate forum. There is no necessity to review the judgment. The review petition is dismissed, subject to the above. J.B.KOSHY ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE V.GIRI JUDGE tks