IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 10th day of August 2005 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.754/2005 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Natthu Gangwar S/o Hulasi Ram R/o Ward No.1 Jail Camp Road Sitarganj District U. S. Nagar ..….Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ……..Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No.973 of 2005 State Vs. Pappu Gangwar & others U/s 363, 366 I.P.C. P.S. Khatima District U. S. Nagar Hon'ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri D. N. Singh learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. Perusal of the statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. reveals that Raju and Shailesh are not corroborating the factum of time of the incident. The learned counsel for the applicant contended that the evidence does not corroborate the prosecution story. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 10.08.2005 LSR