IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 NO. 900 OF 2005 Suraj Chauhan and another. …………Applicants. Versus State of Uttaranchal & another. …Opposite Parties. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of Uttarakhand / opposite party no. 1. Mr. R.C. Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. 17th October, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. By means of this application filed U/s 482 of the Cr.P.C., petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated 11.11.2004 as well as the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2270 of 2004 Kamal Prasad Vs. Suraj and others under Section 420, 427, 468, 471 and 120-B of the I.P.C. 2. Perused the order dated 11.11.2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I. Dehradun in Criminal Case No. 2270 of 2004. The Judicial Magistrate while passing the said order has recorded a finding that prima facie a case is made out against the applicant under Section 420, 120B, 468, 471, 427 I.P.C. The said finding is based upon 2 the statements taken under Section 200 and 202 of Cr.P.C. as well as other relevant documents available on record. Therefore, it cannot be said that there is any abuse of process of law. 3. I have gone through the counter affidavit, rejoinder affidavit, supplementary counter affidavit and other relevant documents available on record. After going through the entire documents available on record, I find the proceedings and the summoning order perfectly justified. 4. Therefore, present application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. lacks merit and is dismissed. (P.C. Verma, J.) 17.10.2008 Rathour