RT ATE HHATTISGARH BILASP ' DI ORAM HON’BLE SHRIS R NAYAK CJ & HON’BLE SHR! D R DESU Misc. AppeaivNO. 1123 'OF 2005 hakur Ram, S/o Akturam $au, Age bout 43 years, Rio Village Senchua, Tah Kurud. Distt. Dhamtagi C.G. () Mhd / s r D gd V / ppellarit A Claimant o Siddlkl So Mohd Deen Rio hahld Hamid Nagar Tlkarapara Raipu lstt Ralpur (G G ) Driver of AHee ehicle) T t y he Orienal Assurance Compan imited. Near By Adars Bal Mandi, L h r Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (6.6.) REsPeKims oE Pyesent: Mr. Hemant Gupta, learned counael for the appellant. ’ l i l i (Passed GRAL on 16‘“ ORDER January, 2006) The followmg order of the Court was passed by R. DESHMUKH J D l The only ground urged before us in this appeal is that‘te MA¢T While awarding eompensation did not take into eonsideration he medical expenses incurred as also the personal disability suffered by‘t iniured; >We have gone through the award passed by the learned 'MAC and find that the doctor examined before the MACT has stated that o s n permanent dlsablllty was suffered by the lnlurecl Besldes learned MACT has awarded the entire medical expenses of Rs 93 000i~ Incurred by the l appellant and also awarded Rs10000l- towards mental pain and suffering Leanred MACT has also awarded Rs 10 OOOI— towards future l s l ‘ é h “ilk; l 1k i: ufferings. ln our consrdered opinion, the compensation awarded by the earned MACT is just and proper and does not call for any interfe’‘rerice. x i t i l l l HIGH COU OF JUDICUR C UR VISION BENCH C « HMKH J 1. T h d a t h he T :Wé§f‘lhd>no‘‘substah Nb cdsts. r ' I, Sdl- t Cef Justice sap DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH Juge ‘ ce ' v ¢ } d fx hi l P;