IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST MAY 2008 / 31ST VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38112 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.K.ISHA,W/O.K.K.BABU, KAPPADATHOTTIYIL HOUSE, PALLAMTHURUTHU ROAD, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, RETIRED U.D. CLERK, PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN MANNALI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY OFFICE, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, NORTH PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.A.SHAJI FOR R1,R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 38112 of 2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.5.2007 EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 17.9.2007 EXHIBIT-P2A: TRUE COPY OF THE A.D. CARD DENOTING THE RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT-P2 REPRESENTATION DATED 18.9.2007 EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SEND BY PETITIONER'S HUSBAND TO THE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA DATED 29.3.2007 EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE CHIEF MINISTER'S OFFICE DATED 19.4.2007 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 38112 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 21st May, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who retired on 31.5.2006, is aggrieved by the non-disbursal of her retirement benefits (except monthly pension) in spite of Exhibit P1 order of sanction. Respondents- Municipality has filed a counter affidavit and it is stated therein that DCRG has already been disbursed on 3.4.2008. The said submission is recorded. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Sajan Mannali and learned standing counsel for the Municipality Sri.T.A Shaji. Sri.Shaji submits that other retirement benefits shall also be disbursed, as early as possible. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent Municipality to disburse the balance amount due to the petitioner by way of retirement benefits, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007 Common issues are raised for consideration in all these writ petitions. Reference is made to the facts in Writ Petition No.4562/2008 for the sake of convenience.