IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4150 of 2011() ----------------------- CC.738/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-IV, KOZHIKODE .............. PETITIONERS / ACCUSED: -------------------------------------- 1. YASAR ARAFATH.T.P, S/O.USMANKOYA, JAS MAHAL, EAST NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE. 2. V.M.SUBAIDA, D/O.USMANKOYA, JASEENA MANZIL, EAST NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE. 3. JASEENA FAROOQUE, D/O.USMANKOYA, JASEENA MANZIL, EAST NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE. 4. JUMANA ASKAR, S/O.USMANKOYA, JASEENA MANZIL, EAST NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. NAJDILA.A.P, W/O.YASAR ARAFAT.T.P, JAS MAHAL, EAST NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.R.SREEJITH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- Crl.MC.No. 4150 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS : ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE IN CC 738/2011 OF THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-1V, KOZHIKODE. ANNEXURES A2(A),A2(B), TRUE COPIES OF SUMMONSES ISSUED TO THE PETITIONERS A2(C),A2(D) IN CC 738/2011 ANNEXURE A3 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWON TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.4150 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of December 2011 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.738/2011 of J.F.C.M.-IV, Kozhikode. The offences alleged against them are under Secs.406, 498A and 324 r/w 34 IPC. 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant therein. She is represented in this Court by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the parties have settled the matter out of court and now, the 2nd respondent and the first petitioner are living together happily. Affidavit to that effect has been filed. In the light of the settlement arrived at, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Further proceeding in C.C.No.738/2011 of J.F.C.M.-IV, Kozhikode is quashed. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt