HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Second Appeal No.243 of 2011 APPELLANT/: (DefendantNo.1) RESPONDENTS/: (Plaintiff) (Defendant No.2) Sehilal, S/o Bhaiyalal, aged about 55 years, Caste Uraon, Occupation Agriculturist, Resident of Village Budar, P.S. Patna, District Korea (C.G.) Versys 1. Mehilal S/o L'ati (Died) Through Legal HR's of Duasiya @ Madhiya Bai, Widow of Mehilal, Caste Uraon, Occupation Agriculturist, Resident of Village Joba, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Korea Distriet Korea (Chhattisgarh) :'> {Second appeal under Section 100 ofCivil Procedure Code} Present: Mr. Prakash Tiwari, counsel for the appellant. Miss Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.2. Single Bencirjlon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORAL ORDER (18-8-2011) 1. By this second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the appellant has challenged legality and propriety of the judgment & decree dated 24-2-2011 passed by the 1 Additional District Judge, Manendragarh in Civil Appeal No.31-A/2010 affirming the judgment & decree of dismissal of suit, dated 19-4-2007 passed by the Civil Judge Class-1, Baikynthpur in Civil Suit No.46-A/2007. 2. Heard on I.A.No.2 for taking doeument on record. 3. On due consideration, I.A.No.2 is allowed. Document be faken on record. 4. Also heard on I.A.No.3 for withdrawal of appeal on account of . compromise. 5. Learned 'counsel for the appellant submits that by compromise agreement dated 17-8-2011, copy ofwhich has been filed along with I.A. si. re Saa^iS^Saa. Bl: 'w ,Mi No.2, parties have compromised the dispute and, therefore, onthe basis of compromise, he seeks to withdraw the appeal. 6. I.A.No.3 is allowed and the appeal is dismissed on the aforesaid grqund of alleged compromise. No order as to costs. Sd;-. Soma A "'ifrSF ..ss^SSliSiSSSfi. "^•"-"•'Y""