IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1582 of 2005 MAHESHWARI PD.SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 06/ 08.03.2010 Heard Ms. Pravina Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raghavendra Kumar Singh, assisting counsel to G.A. 5. Two affidavits have been filed on behalf of the State mentioning therein that the grievance of the petitioner in relation to the differential amount of salary for the period 1.1.1971 to 31.3.1973 together with admissible interest and the dearness allowance for the period 1.4.1974 to May, 1976 deposited in the suspense account of the petitioner has since been paid to the petitioner. It so appears that even the G.P.F. claim of the petitioner has been paid to the petitioner but the petitioner questions the calculations thereof. Having regard to the circumstances that the admissible claims of the petitioner stands paid to him , no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and the same is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance in relation to the G.P.F. amount before the respondent no. 3, the District Provident Fund Officer, Bhagalpur and 2 who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from receipt of such representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)