IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 177 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33667/2007 Dated 15/11/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------------- CLEMENT TITUS, MYLAMMOOTTIL, AMBALAMUKKU, ELAMADU P.O., AYOOR, KOLLAM-69. BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOLLAM, PIN-691 013. 3. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, CHADAYAMANGALAM EXCISE RANGE,CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM-691 534. Sr.GP SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== R.P.No.177 of 2008 in W.P.(C)No.33667 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 29th day of February, 2008. ORDER What is characterized as the judgment dated 15- 11-2007 is essentially an interim order and therefore the last sentence in that judgment that “Writ petition is disposed of as above” is deleted. The caption of that proceedings will stand altered as “Order”. Review petition is allowed accordingly and writ petition will stand restored. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.