IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16933 of 2008 NITIN SEHGAL, SON OF ARUN KUMAR SEHGAL RESIDENT OF B-4, SHANTI VIHAR, NEAR BY CENTRAL JAIL, SHIVPURI, P.S. SHIVPURI, DISTRICT- VARANASI (U.P.) ………..PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MUKESH KUMAR SONI SON OF SUDAMA SAH RESIDENT OF VILL- ELDAR BAZAR, P.S. BHAGWAN BAZAR, DIST.- SARAN ………..OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 3 04.02.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged the order of cognizance dated 22.12.2005 and 01.09.2006 whereby the cognizance has been taken under Sections 417, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Complaint Case No. 766 of 2005. There is nothing on record to suggest the present stage of the case. I see no reason to interfere with the order of cognizance. The application is dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to raise all his contentions at the time of framing the charges if charges have not already been framed. Amrendra/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)