IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2661 of 2011() ----------------------------- CC.380/2005 of J.M.F.C.-I, ALUVA .................... PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. JOY, S/O.JOSE, AREEKATTU HOUSE, ALOOR DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, CHALAKUDY VIA, THRISSUR DIST. 2. RENUKA, AGED 40, D/O.SUBRAN, EDATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ALOOR DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, CHALAKUDY VIA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.N.MANOJ SRIA.G.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRIKKAKARA POLICE STATION THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No.2661 of 2011 ------------------------------- DATED: 31.03.2011 O R D E R Petitioners, who are accused Nos.5 and 6 in C.C.No.380/2005 on the file of J.F.C.M-I, Aluva, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the Magistrate and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioners for their previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of . Dated this the 31st day of March, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj