WP(C) 3861/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S.Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.N.Goswami , learned S.C,Education Department. No affidavit has been filed by the State Respondents as well as the priv ate respondent No. 7 although sufficient opportunity has been provided to them. On going through the context of the writ petition, it is found that the petition er was appointed as Assistant teacher on 22.9.2005 in a venture school. It is al so found that the concerned school has not been provincialized and the said scho ol is still a private Institution. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 5.6.09 issued by the Direc tor, Elementary Education, Assam by which the Director came to the conclusion th at the petitioner is an under qualified person and whereas the respondent No. 7 is a qualified person for holding the post of Asstt. Teacher in the L.P.School. There is no merit in this writ petition. Moreover, no writ lies against the priv ate school. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed. ad