IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1195 OF 2008 State of Maharashtra vs. Keshav Ganpat Bhatkar Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.S. Doifode, APP for the appellant. ..... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE AND B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. JUNE 11, 2008. Heard. The trial Court has disbelieved the written dying declaration, particularly in view of the fact that the accused himself had sustained 14% burns. DW-1 – Kum. Varsha, the daughter of the deceased and accused stated that the deceased was accidentally burnt. It may be further noted that DW-2 – Venutai, real sister of the deceased as well as DW-3 – Devanand, cousin of deceased did not support the theory of oral dying declaration made to them by the deceased. Thus, prima facie, there appears to be no perversity in the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court. Hence, leave to appeal is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.