IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5790 of 2011 1. KUSAMA DEVI 2. Pramod Yadav 3. Vijendra Yadav …………………….. Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no. 2 Pramod Yadav has been arrested. Hence his application has become infructuous. The petitioner no. 1 being the mother-in-law and petitioner no. 2 being elder brother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 328, 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners is of administering poison and disposing of the dead body. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the FIR does not disclose date of alleged marriage. The accusation of administering poison is against the entire family. The Post Mortem Report or the Inquest do not reflect any external injury. Moreover the witnesses during investigation have suggested that the petitioners were living separate from the husband and the victim having fought with the husband consumed poison herself. Learned Counsel for the State Mr. Thakur submitted that there is accusation of disposing of the dead body by the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners 1 and 3 above named, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 494 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Consecutive three days absence of the petitioners will give reason to the court below for cancellation of their bail bonds. Snkumar/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)