IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9535 of 2007 RAM SHRESTHA SHUKLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.10281 of 2007 SURYA NARAYAN CHATURVEDI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.10315 of 2007 CHAMPA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.11198 of 2007 SHIV NARAYAN PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16484 of 2007 SURSARI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.16642 of 2007 BALDEO PRASAD KUSHWAHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS with CWJC No.6319 of 2008 MANJU DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.6423 of 2008 MANGALA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS ----------- 02. 07.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. All the above writ applications are related to 2 common issue with regard to their payment of retiral dues which have not been paid till date, as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious redressal of their grievance as highlighted in the writ applications petitioners propose to file a fresh representation before the concerned authority within a period of four weeks. In case such representations are filed, the grievance of the petitioners be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the pending claims of the petitioners could be settled with interest permissible under the rules. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)