1 S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITON NO.1381/2007. (AMRA @ AMAR CHAND VS. STATE & ANR.) DATE OF ORDER : 08.01.2008. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. Manoj Pareek for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhayay, Public Prosecutor. This revision petition is preferred to challenge the order dated 22.10.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Udaipur framing charges for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 354, 452, 324 and 307 IPC. The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the injury received by injured Ms. Geeta is simple in nature and that too is not on vital part, therefore, no charge for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC could have been framed. I have perused the order impugned as well as other relevant records. In the complaint itself, it is averred that in night hours, an assault was made with knife at neck of injured Ms. 2 Geeta. It may be correct that the injury received is simple, but totality of the facts establishes very well that prima facie it is a case to presume for commission of the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. Thus, I do not find any reason to interfere in the order impugned. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/