1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR F.A. No. 98 of 2009 The New India Assurance v. Abdul and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr A.H. Patil, Adv for appellant Mr Manish Patkar, Advocate for respdt 1 Respondents no. 2, 3 served Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 16 th July 2010 Not on board. Taken on board at the request of learned counsel for the parties. Heard learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondent no.1. None appears for respondents no. 2 and 3 though served. Respondent no.1 is present in the Court and he is identified by his advocate. He admits the terms and conditions of compromise arrived at by and between appellant and respondent no.1 and reduced into writing by way of compromise pursis. Compromise pursis is taken on record and marked “X” for 2 identification. First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of compromise pursis. Respondent no.1 is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs. 5,22,601/- out of the total sum deposited and appellant is permitted to withdraw rest of the amount. Refund of court fee as per rules. Judge. Hsj