'\ fe r" HIQH COURT OF CHW^mSGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. (Cl No.920^007 Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dil4> Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appellants Claimants Respondents Smt. Triveni Oas, aged about 26 years, Wd/o Late Inderpal Das, S/o. Through Kedar F^asad Gupta, Firangipara, Kargiroad, kota, District-Bilaspur (C.©.) Versus 1. Liyakat Ali, aged 32 years. S/o Manohar All, R?o Telipara, P.S. City Kotwali. Tahsil and Ditbnct Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Pushpraj Sharrr®, S/o (yto^lal Sharma, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, opposite High Court. Bilaspur (C.G.) Miscellaneous Appeal under Sectfon 173 of Motor \tehicle Act. 1988 Present- Shri Govtam Khetrapal, counselferthe appellanfc ORAL ORDER (Passed on 7th August, 2007) Heard on admission. (2) The appellant is aggrieved by an award dated 24-03-2007 passed by the Ist Addftional Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat, Bitespyr (hereinafter referred asttie M.A.C.T.) in clafenn case No.1^/2006 wherebyeorapensation of Rs.10,000/- was awarded to the claimant for injuries suffered by her dwe to vehicular accident which took place on 08-08-2005. (3) Perusal of the record shows that the appellant-daimant did nl@t ^iffler \ any grievous Injury or disability. The X-Ray report Ex.P-4 as ateo the report —2-- /':•' of C.T. Scan did not reveal any fracture or other complicatton. The claimant was hospitalized only for 3 days. The M.A.C.T. has awarcted compensatten of Rs.10,000/-, break-up of which is as fotlows; (a) Expenses incurred towards tfeatment - f:te.7,4©@/- (b) Towards pain andsuffering - Rs.1,000/- (c) Towards special di^ - Rs.1.600/- TOTAL Rs.10.000/- (4) In my considered opinton, the compensation awarded by ttie teamed M.A.C.T. is jiBt and reasonable compen^rtion. In ttie facts and circumstances of the case, no iltegaHty in ttie impugned award is seen. (5) In the result, the appeat js dismissed at Itie stage of admission. ^ Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Tumane