IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22410 of 2011 Date of decision December 2, 2011 Jaskirat Singh ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-8) which has been addressed to the second respondent is considered and appropriate orders be issued on the basis of the representation. 2. As ordered. 3. The Second respondent shall consider the representation (Annexure P-8) and take appropriate decision as per law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 2, 2011 archana