IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 734 of 2006 (MB) 1. Shravan Kumar Verma s/o Sri Ram Baran Verma 2. Smt. Murti Devi w/o Sri Ram Baran Verma 3. Thana Ram @ Pappu s/o Sri Ram Baran Verma 4. Smt. Reena Verma w/o Sri Thana Ram 5. Parveen Kumar s/o Sri Ram Baran Verma, 1 to 5 all residents of 83, Sri Dev Suman Nagar, Ballupur Road, P.S. Basant Vihar, Dehradun. 6. Smt. Anita Verma Mehta wife of Devender Mehta r/o Mitthi Beri, Prem Nagar, Dehradun ……….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal 2. Station House Office, Police Station Basant Vihar, District Dehradun 3. Smt. Pratima Verma w/o Sri Shravan Kumar Verma, D/o Sri Jai Chand Verma R/o 218, D.L. Road, P.S.Dalanwala, Dehradun ..…… Respondents ………. Sri Pradeep Lohani, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C. J. Hon’ble P.C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Pradeep Lohani, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C. Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners – Shravan Kumar Verma, Smt. Murti Devi, Thana Ram @ Pappu, Smt. Reena Verma, Praveen Kumar and Smt. Anita Verma Mehta, seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, has now become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation though has filed charge-sheet against petitioner no. 1 Shravan Kumar and petitioner no. 2 Murti Devi before the concerning Court, but no case worth filing charge-sheet was found against petitioners 3 to 6, namely, Thana Ram @ Pappu, Smt. Reena Verma, Praveen Kumar and Smt. Anita Verma Mehta. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 22.06.2006 stands vacated automatically. (P.C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 08.08.2006 08.08.2006 A