IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19519 of 2011 Narsingh Goud Versus The State Of Bihar --------- 02. 01.07.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34, 120B of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that when the informant was going with her husband then Bhushan Yadav and Kitabuddin Ansari stopped them when Bhushan Yadav caused fire arm injury on the hand of the husband of the informant and thereafter both the F.I.R. named accused persons with two unknown persons chased the husband of the informant and subsequently caused fire arm injury as a result of which the husband of the informant died. The F.I.R. reflects that the informant suspected the hands of the petitioner in commission of the offence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that admittedly the petitioner is not the assailants and the F.I.R. suggests that the informant was none to the petitioner, hence it can not be suggested that two unknown persons present at the place of occurrence consists of the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is serious land dispute of the petitioner with the informant’s side for which litigation is also pending. - 2 - It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the victim was a lawyer and during investigation the co-accused Kitabuddin Ansari admitted that the occurrence took place at the instance of the petitioner. It is also submitted that Kitabuddin Ansari was the employee of the petitioners. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that statement of Kitabuddin Ansari was recorded after ten days of the occurrence and there is nothing on record to suggest that Kitabuddin Ansari was the employee of the petitioners. Considering the fact that accusation of assault was levelled against the F.I.R. named accused persons and on the own version of the informant the petitioner was not present at the place of the occurrence, let the petitioner namely Narsingh Goud, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Bijaipur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2011. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)