IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24706 of 2009 1.LALLAN NAT @ LAL MOHAMMAD 2.SUBHASH NAT -----Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.10.2009 This case has come under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is submitted that in the petition for bail due to inadvertence in the address of petitioner no.1, it has been mentioned as District-East Champaran instead of West Champaran. Similarly, in the address of petitioner no.2, it has been mentioned as District-West Champaran instead of East Champaran. Accordingly, on account of such mistakes, similar mistakes have crept in in the order dated 10.9.2009 granting bail to the petitioners. As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary corrections in the address of the petitioners in the bail petition. Accordingly, let the address in the order dated 10.9.2009 with respect to petitioner no.1 and 2 be read as District- West Champaran and District-East Champaran respectively. The order dated 10.9.2009 is modified to the above extent only. The order may be communicated to the court below i.e., the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No.112/08 through fax at the cost being deposited by the petitioners. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)