IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6733 of 2008 Date of decision : May 26, 2009 Dharma and others Petitioners Versus Karan Singh and others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4 A.N. JINDAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated they being necessary party to the suit for partition filed by the respondents should have been impleaded as party defendants but they were not impleaded as such and get a preliminary decree on 2.4.1997. Now the petitioners have applied for impleading them as defendants at the stage of passing the final decree. Heard, it was a representative suit in which the preliminary decree has already been passed. Now the remedy with the petitioners is to challenge the decree or they could file the objection petition for setting their rights if any. Faced with this situation, prayer to withdraw the petition has been made. As such, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioners to opt the remedy as provided under law. (A.N.JINDAL) 26.05.2009 JUDGE reena