COCP No.2415 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2415 of 2011 Date of decision: 09.12.2011 H.L.Chawla ...Petitioner Versus Shri K.K.Jalan and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. B.S.Saroha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paramjit Batta, Addl.A.G.Haryana. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that the order dated 13.10.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No.8617 of 2000 has not been complied with, whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the following observations:- “Taking the mitigating circumstances into consideration, this court is of the view that the order (Annexure P11) whereby the 50% pension was withdrawn can be modified to the extent that the petitioner is entitled to the pension for the period, for which he had rendered the service. However, the other punishments, so awarded by the Punishing Authority in the order (Annexure P11), are upheld. The arrear of the pension be calculated and paid to the petitioner.” 1 COCP No.2415 of 2011 2. Upon notice having been issued, reply has been filed by way of affidavit of respondent No.2 wherein in para 4, it has been stated as under:- “4. That in compliance of order passed by the Hon’ble Court, the respondent Department made following payments to the petitioner on account of revised pension arrear as sanctioned by the Accountant General, Haryana vide his letter No.PEN-2/0191759-S/1/P/11/15/23527 dated 8.11.2011 (Annexure R.1) and No. PEN- 213/112210222102/1/P/11/15/23527 dated 8.11.2011 (Annexure R.II), the arrear of revised pension w.e.f 1.1.1999 to 31.10.2011 difference of pension Rs.4,31,364/- paid on 23.11.2011 and commutation Rs.136749/- paid on 21.11.2011 (Annexure R-III) By Central Bank of India, Kurukshetra. The DCRG has been sanctioned vide A.G. Haryana No.PEN- 2/12112210222102/1/P/11/15/23527 dated 8./11.2011 for Rs.58,850/- in favour of retiree (Annexure R-IV).” 3. In view of the above, no further action is called for in this petition. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to legal remedies in accordance with law, if any grievance still subsists. 4. The petition is disposed of accordingly. December 09, 2011 (Ajay Kumar Mittal) ‘gs’ Judge 2