IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44888 of 2009 1. MD.YASIN SIDDIQUE & 2. SAIMUM SIDDIQUIE VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.02.2010. Petitioners who happen to be father-in-law and mother-in-law of complainant apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offence under sections 498A, 323 & 406 of the Penal Code. They submit that in fact their daughter, namely, Khurshid Bano was also married with brother of complainant and for the similar allegation of torturing her, they have also filed a case under section 498A I.P.C. against prosecution side. They further submit that compromise has also been arrived at between the parties, as per which both parties were to withdraw cases filed against each other, whereafter prosecution side was allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 18.11.2009, passed by the Jharkhand High Court, annexure 4. Having heard the parties, this Court is of the view that if the petitioners surrender within six weeks from today and complainant appears and supports the factum of compromise in Complaint case no. 801C/2005, then in that case, the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai would pass order preferably on the same day taking into consideration the subsequent compromise arrived at between the parties, otherwise he would pass order on the merits of the case without prejudice. Needless to mention that petitioners are at liberty to bring to the notice of the court any other orders while hearing the matter. Let this order be faxed to the court above at the cost of the petitioners. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)