IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9650 of 2009 GURU DYAL PAL son of Late Nirdhan Pal, Resident of village- Rajkhand, P.S. Samastipur (M), District- Samastipur ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Md. Nasim alias Nasim Miya, son of Id Mohammad, Resident of village- Rajkhand, P.S. Samastipur (M), District- Samastipur …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 07.09.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the conduct of the trial court reflecting in the order dated 02.02.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Fast Track Court No. IV, Samastipur, in Sessions Trial No.703 of 2007/ 170 of 2007, by which he has kept the petition filed under section 319 Cr. P.C. on behalf of the prosecution in abeyance for no cogent reason. In my view, the order impugned is completely unjustified and it would be desirable that the trail court would pass final order on the petition filed on behalf of the prosecution within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Let this order be communicated to Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Fast Track Court No. IV, Samastipur, in connection with Sessions Trial No.703 of 2007/ 170 of 2007 through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)