(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1525 OF 2010 1. Sai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Hedgewar, Hedgewar Chowk, Mukhed, Taluka : Mukhed, District : Nanded [Through its President]. 2. Sai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Hedgewar, Hedgewar Chowk, Mukhed, .. Petitioners Taluka : Mukhed, (Original respondent District : Nanded nos.1 and 2) [Through its Secretary]. versus 1. Nandini d/o. Namdeo Tijare, Age : 36 years, Occupation : At present nil, R/o. Rajurkar House, Near Marathwada Gramin Bank, Wai [Bazar], Taluka : Mahur, .. Respondents District : Nanded. (No.1 - Original appellant & 2. The Education Officer [Secondary], No.2 - Original Zilla Parishad, Nanded. respondent no.3) ....................... (2) Mr. Vivek Dhage, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. A.V. Patil, Advocate, holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3RD MARCH 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. Vivek Dhage, for the petitioners; Adv. Mr. A.V. Patil, holding for Adv. Mr. V.D. Gunale, for respondent no.1, and learned AGP Mrs. V.A. Shinde, for respondent no.2. 2. Matter is being heard from time to time by this court. Some proposals and counter proposals given were also recorded earlier. Today, the petitioner through its President and respondent no.1, in person, along with their respective Advocates agree to following arrangement : (3) (i) The entire outstanding amount of wages payable to respondent no.1 till 15th May 2011 shall be deposited by the petitioners before School Tribunal by 15th May 2011. (ii) Respondent no.1 / employee is free to receive such amount out of amount deposited so as to make total amount received by her till 15th May 2011, fifty percent of the amount due and payable to her. (iii) The School Tribunal shall accordingly permit respondent no.1 to withdraw that much amount. (iv) After the amount is deposited as mentioned above, by 15th May 2011, the petitioner / management shall lead necessary evidence before the School Tribunal to prove alleged lapses / misconduct on the part of respondent no.1. Thereafter, respodent / employee shall also be free to lead evidence in defence. (v) The School Tribunal shall attempt to decide the controversy as early as possible and in any case, within a period of four months from 15th May 2011. (vi) If the amount is not deposited as mentioned above, the (4) impugned judgment of School Tribunal shall revive and operate. (vii) The balance amount with School Tribunal shall be allowed to be withdrawn by party succeeding before the School Tribunal. (viii) Parties shall be free to challenge adverse orders of School Tribunal in accordance with law. 3. With these observations and directions, the petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wpt1525