IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1153 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1005 OF 2007. Tanaji Vithal Jadhav ..... ...... ......Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra ..... ...... ......Respondent. Mr.V.S.Talkute, Adv. For the applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, APP For the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 29/1/08 PC: Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned additional public prosecutor. It is undisputed that PW-2 alone is an eye witness to the incident which has resulted in conviction of the applicant for commission of an offence punishable under section 325 of Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer RI for three years. PW-2 came to be declared hostile by the prosecution. She has given different versions during her deposition. The appeal is not likely to come up for hearing before expiry of period of sentence. The applicant was on bail during the trial and has not misused the same. I have perused the judgment so also the evidence of PW-2. In my opinion, this is a fit case for grant of bail. In the result I direct that the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released during the trial on executing fresh bonds. Application stands disposed of.