C.R. No.6167 of 2005 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6167 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.08.2009 Gurmeet Singh .....Petitioner Versus Punjab Backward Classes Land Development and Finance Corporation and others ....Respondents Present: None for the parties. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1. The application for injunction was sought by the plaintiff restraining the defendant from enforcing the loan. The trial Court dismissed the application and the Appellate Court affirmed the same. The plaintiff, who moved the interlocutory application, is the revision petitioner before this court. 2. The amount availed by the plaintiff was admittedly under a loan transaction with the defendant for establishing a milk dairy. As per the contentions of the defendant, the plaintiff was required to submit utilization receipts, which he failed to submit. The concessional rate of interest, which was provided, was withdrawn and a penalty was imposed for mis-utilization of funds. Although the plaintiff had claimed that he had paid about Rs.58,000/-, the C.R. No.6167 of 2005 (O&M) -2- defendant's contention was that the amount was still due to the tune of Rs.34,719/-. The Court found that there was no justification for grant of interim relief and dismissed the application, however, making an observation that the order passed was not to be construed as opinion on the merits in controversy between the parties. 3. The order of the trial Court as well as the Appellate Court are perfectly justified. In a case by the plaintiff that no amount is due and that loan transaction had been fully satisfied, the relief of injunction shall not be appropriate and the rejection of the plaintiff's claim was in accordance with law. 4. The revision petition is wholly without merit and dismissed accordingly. No costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 12, 2009 Pankaj*