1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.3191 OF 1994 State Bank of Mysore Plaintiff versus Rathin Chatterjee Defendant Ms.Richa Bhardwaj i/by M/s.Shah & Sanghavi for plaintiff. None for the defendants. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 21st February 2011 PC : 1. By order dated 6.1.2010 the suit was directed to be placed under the caption "for ex-parte decree" and was adjourned to 3.2.2010. On 3.2.2010 the plaintiff sought an adjournment of the matter and the matter was adjourned to 17.2.2010. On 17.2.2010 at the request of the advocate for the plaintiff, the matter was again adjourned to 17.3.2010. On 7.1.2011 once again time was sought by the advocate appearing for the plaintiff. The matter was therefore adjourned to 24.1.2011. On 24.1.2011 once again time was sought on behalf of the plaintiff and the matter was adjourned to 21.2.2011 i.e. today. Today the learned advocate for the plaintiff states that their client have still not forwarded the documents on which they seek to rely, to them and therefore they are unable to file a compilation of original documents before the Court. She once again prays for time to file the compilation of documents. 2. As recorded hereinabove, the plaintiff has repeatedly sought adjournments for production of the compilation of documents for the past more than one year, but despite time being granted as set out 2 hereinabove, he has failed to produce the same. It is therefore established beyond any doubt that the plaintiff is disinterested in carrying on with the prosecution of the suit. The suit is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)