IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3170 of 2010 SHIV PUJAN ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.3212 of 2010 SANTIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.3241 of 2010 BRAJ KISHORE SAHAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.3262 of 2010 HARI CHARAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 23.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioners in all the above writ applications is with regard to the payment of arrears of revised pension. It is submitted that petitioners have not received the same despite request. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in these writ applications, petitioners propose to file separate representations before the Municipal Commissioner of the respondent Corporation. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed 2 by the petitioners within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioners could be settled without delay and admitted dues could also be paid along with statutory interest. All the above writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)