;':li'w"":".''l'w"' y\ ~- '^iiifi^^ Q ~ •^ IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.NO. 45'^/2004. PETITIONER '§MT.RUKMANI SHARMA, W/o DILIP SHARMA, Aged about 30 years, R/o Smghauri, Tahsil Khairagarh, Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.). VERSUS • ••-—~-'':"^.: RESPONDENTS ^ -1 ^^,^.^v^ '.-••'.^^•' ^^ .d '•w"~^ 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, ThroughChief Secretary, Office situated at Secretariate Raipiir (C.G.). y^ ^y^' •^.^ ^?" c'V 2. PROJECT OFFICER, KuUiurmala, Part A, Block Khairagarh, Dist.Rajnangaon (C.G.). 3. COLLECTOR, Rajnandgaon, Office Situated at Rajnandgaon (C.G.). "'•-.. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CON- STITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WMT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/ DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS.ORDER/ORDERS. "^'sy o HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITiONER WRIT PETITION N0. 4556 OF 2004 Smt. Rukmani Sharma RESPQNDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others pft/rit Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P. Dhurandhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer forfrie State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 30th day of March, 2010) Leamed counsei appearing for the petltioner, on instructions, submite that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 2) It is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is diemissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. A^nihotri Judge Gowri