1 caf3777-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3777 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.786 OF 2009 Gangadhar S. Gullappalli .. Applicant V/s. Shivaji Baburao Vitkar & Ors. .. Respondents ..... Mr. Sudhir C. Halli for the applicant. Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 15, 2011. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. The Application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1,3 and 4. Perused the reply of the said respondents. 2. On 7th July, 2009, the Appeal preferred by the Appellant has been dismissed as none appeared for the appellant. In paragraph No.3 of the 2 caf3777-09 application, reasons have been recorded for non appearance of the appellant. Hence, a case for restoration is made out. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (bi). JUDGE