UGH COLTRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPL^R Jai Chand Thakur S/o Jannu Ram, aged 35 years, Watemiaii cum watcl-anan in Gffvt. Pre-matric Aadiwasi girls Hostel, C!iikhla Kasar [Dallirajhara], Distt. Duri [C.G.1 R/o. village Baghmara, Tah. Balod, Distt. Durg [C.G.] 1. State of Chhattisgarh, throush - Secretary, Sehedule Tribes, Scheduled Castes and other backward class welfare, Department, UDUT rC.G.1 rc.Gi 2. Collector, Durg, District Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Ollll! Smg'le Bench: Hon'ble Mx. Justice Satish K. Agmhotri. Present: Smt. Meena Shashtri, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. 1. ORAL ORDER The case ofthe petitioner is that he was appoiated as peon (Class IV Employee) in Pre Matric Adivasi Girls Hostel. ChikMa Kasar fDallirajharal, Distt. Dure, on 12.08.1992, under 'Anusuchit Jati/Janjati Vishesh Bhartiya Abhiyan' by the concemed Collector as per merit list prepared by the selection committes. The grievaace offhe petitioner in fhis -wnt petition is that the respondents have not resularized his service till date. The petitioner has filed a representation to tbe Collector Durg in this regard and that has ,not been decided. The petitioner made several reqiiests for regularization of his services in oral and written fonn, but ^} the authority is not ready to take any positive action. He had filed a representation to the Collector, Dure, on 16.09.2004 In this petition filed under .^rticle 226 of the Constitution of India, the relief sougfat for by the petitioner is as under: "Tais Horible Court kindly be pleased to diwet the respondents to pay Ifae petitioner regular pay-scaie with an-ears ofpay sinee 1 1992 or after 1992 making r^gularization." In mv opinion the resoonsible respondents ouslit to have considered the srievaace of the petitioner made in his representation. Since that has not been done, a direction reqrires to be issued to the respondents. Accordingly, the followins: ORDER (i) The writ petition is disposed of. Cii) A direction is issued to the competent authoritv before whom the representation said to have been filed by the petitioner is pending, to consider the same and pass an aporopriate order ia accordance with law, within six months from fhe date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge