IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2034 of 2007 BIBI IMAMAN Versus FARZAN MIAN@ FARDAN MIAN & ORS. ----------- 2 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By the impugned order, the petition seeking amendment in the plaint has been rejected by the court below. The learned court below has found that the amendment petition has been filed after the arguments of both the sides have been closed and the case was about to be fixed for judgment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amendment sought for by the petitioner was, in fact, admitted by the defendants in the written statement and in evidence also, the same stands supported. He submits that in view of the statement of the written statement and the evidence, prima facie it appears that the amendment sought for was to remove typographical mistake in the plaint. If that is so, the learned court below shall consider the evidence of the parties adduced in this regard and shall consider the case of the parties and pronounce judgment in - 2 - accordance with law. With the above observation and direction, this civil revision application is disposed of. B.T (J.N Singh, J)