IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20117 of 2004 Between: 1 Madinappi Sailoo, S/o. Late Ramachandru, R/o. Panthini, Wardhannapet, Warangal District. 2 Nalam Sailoo, S/o. Veeraiah, R/o. Kothur Village, Raiparthi Mandal, Warangal District. 3 B. Veeraswamy, S/o. Late Narsaiah, R/o. Oblapur Village, Zaffargadh Mandal, Warangal District. 4 Bandapalli Veeramma, W/o. Veeraswamy, R/o. Oblapur Village, Zaffargadh Mandal, Warangal District. 5 Bommera Rama Devi, W/o. Veeraswamy, R/o. Perikedu Village, Warangal District. 6 Bandapalli Bhagyamma, W/o. Yellagoud, R/o. Panthini, Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District. 7 G. Hymavathi, W/o. Kumaraswamy, R/o. Panthini, Wardhannapet Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Warangal District, Warnagal. 2 The Project Director, District Rural Development Authority (DRDA) Collectorate Pragathi Bhavan, Subedari, Warangal. 3 The Executive Director, The District Backward Classes Services Co-operative Society Limited (BCSCS Ltd) Collectorate Pragathi Bhavan, Subedari, Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the amount along with the subsidy to the petitioners for digging wells for the purpose of agriculture under Swarna Jayathi Grameena Rojgar Yojana Scheme (SCRY) though the petitioners were selected for release of the said amount during the year 1998-99, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the said scheme and consequently direct the respondent authorities to forthwith release the same. Counsel for the Petitioners:SMT.KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The petitioners applied for subsidy for the purpose of digging bore wells for agricultural purposes under the scheme of ‘Swarnajayanthi Grameena Rojgar Yojana’ and the same was said to have been forwarded to the first respondent by the third respondent in the year 2000, but in spite of the repeated request made by the petitioners, no amounts were released in favour of the petitioners. In view of the same, the petitioners moved this Court by way of present writ petition. Unless the above said scheme is in operation and the present Government is extended the same, the petitioners cannot insist that necessary subsidy should be paid to them for digging of bore wells. If the scheme is in operation, the first respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioners dated 17.11.2003 as per the recommendations of the third respondent, and pass appropriate orders and intimate the same to the petitioners. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _________________ A. GOPAL REDDY. J. 3rd November, 2004 tsr. To 1 The District Collector, Warangal District, Warnagal. 2 The Project Director, District Rural Development Authority (DRDA) Collectorate Pragathi Bhavan, Subedari, Warangal. 3 The Executive Director, The District Backward Classes Services Co-operative Society Limited (BCSCS Ltd) Collectorate Pragathi Bhavan, Subedari, Warangal. 4. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT). 5 Two CD copies.