1 ndm 33 appr.699.09 anr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 699 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP ) NO. 778 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP ) NO. 778 OF 2009 Lalit Raichand Mutha. ... APPLICANT Vs. Sampat Ganpat Amrale and anr. ... RESPONDENTS -------- Mr. Ranjeet Patil i/b Mr. K.S. Patil for Applicant. Mr. J.P. Kharge, APP for State. -------- CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 21 st April, 2010. P.C. 1 This is an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed. The Revision Application is taken on board for admission. 2 By way of present Revision Application, the Applicant challenges the judgment and order passed by the learned Judicial 2 Magistrate, First Class, Wai dated 27 th April, 2007 to the extent it gives a benefit to the accused of the Probation of Offender’s Act. 3 Mr. Ranjeet Pati, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that the learned trial Court has grossly erred in giving benefit of the Probation of Offender’s Act to the accused when the charges against him duly proved. 4 The learned trial Court has given sound reasons as to why in the facts of the present case, the accused was entitled to the benefits of the Probation of Offender’s Act. 5 In that view of the matter, no perversity is noticed to warrant interference. Hence rejected [ B.R. GAVAI, J ]