SSMfil E RCSI esjiijti.E B.siiy 0-0 c^-' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P. fSI N0. 2-38 11007 PETITIONER j^y .^^ /)^'^''.'\\''' .-•''' ^<:^'\v-: ...•••".,*!-\v't--"' »••'.^0*^>:>'' <;»' "..•" s<y' ..-••" RESPONDENTS ^l Shyam Lal Sidar Aged about 45 Years, S/o. Shri Nandu Ram Sidar Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Baghnipali, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) '? DistrictEducation Officer Janjgir-Chama District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST^TUION OF INDIA J XI-HC-78 3^-^ireRTiT, STfhm?, f^rrey w *11H?ITsb*11cb ;P'.CS;;...^?A ^ 200 t5T<ra^T ('^fg^ET) W^TERTfN^ (Wsn^Tsbiw Bablu t>i«^in^*<itRiyir'fe'<a <Riwi<' ^•arf^trsn^T Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel for |1-he petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain, Ponel l<n»ye|ffor- the respondents/State. With the consent of leamed counsel for the parties, the matters are heard finally and disposed of. Orderdtetoted in W.P. (s) t^lo. 238 of 2007 in open Court, passed separately. A copy of this order be pla^ed on record in other connected writ petitwns. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge w P.T.O. M 13. HI6HCOURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILA5PUR W. P.(S) No. 238 of 2007 Petitioner : Shyam Lal Sickir Versus Re^ondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others W. P.(S) No. 241 of 2007 Petitioner : Balram Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others And A, W. P.(S) No. 242 of 2007 Petitioner : Umashankar Dansena Versus Re^iondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel for the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jaun, Panel lawyer for -the respondents/State. OR DER (Passed on this 18tit Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel cppewing for -the petitioners as wetl as leamed Panel lawyer cppearing for the State/reqiondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P.(S) No. 6884/2006 (Bhikham 5in9h Sinha Vs. State of ChhdrttiS9<»rh & others), which wos disposed of vide order dated 12 becember, 2006. They further submit that •the question of hw involved is also the same. ^9 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counselfor the parties, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th Oecember, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P.(S) No. 6884/2006 (Bhikham Singh Sinha Vs. State of Chhanisgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record in other connected writ petttions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge