IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 15431 of 2008. Decided on: 06.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Munshi Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner’s case, in a nutshell, is that persons junior to him have been regularised without considering his case. This position is admitted as per the contents of supplementary affidavit. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work- charge status from the date his juniors were considered, as indicated in the supplementary affidavit. Needful be done within a period of ten weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 06, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?