R.S.A. No. 764 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.S.A. No. 764 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 9, 2009 Satbir Kaur …..Appellant Vs. Amarjit Singh and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the appellant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff - appellant Bhan Singh now represented by his heir, for declaration, possession and for permanent injunction that he is owner in possession of the house in dispute and for possession of the shop shown red in the site plan forming part of the abovesaid house, stands dismissed by the Courts below, believing the plea of the defendant- respondent No.1 to the effect that vide two sale deed dated July 29, 1991 R.S.A. No. 764 of 2009 [2] and August 22, 1997, the plaintiff has sold the property in dispute to defendant- respondent No.1. Counsel for the appellant has contended that the oral statement of defendant wherein he has shown his ignorance regarding the payment of consideration has been ignored by the Courts below. After hearing counsel for the appellant and going through the record, I am of the opinion that a concurrent finding of fact has been given by the Courts below pertaining to the two sale deeds mentioned hereinabove that the plaintiff had actually, by virtue of two sale deeds, sold the property to the defendant for consideration. The registered documents have been believed by the Courts below superseding the oral testimony of the defendant. No ground is made out for interference. Dismissed. November 9, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE