..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.873 OF 2009 Pravin Chandrakant Talpe. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.M.K. Kocharekar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : MARCH 20, 2009. DATED : MARCH 20, 2009. DATED : MARCH 20, 2009. (IN CHAMBER, 2:40 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER, 2:40 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER, 2:40 P.M.) P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant are seeking bail in C.R.No.I-54 of 2008 of Kolshewadi police station, Kalyan. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that co-accused Sandeep @ Balya Rajbali Manohar has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 3.2.2009 and the case of the applicant ..(2).. stands on better footing than that of co-accused Sandeep @ Balya Rajbali Manohar. As far as the actual incident is concerned, it is an admitted fact that the role of the applicant and the co-accused Sandeep is similar. However, in addition thereto there is recovery of weapon at the instance of co-accused Sandeep, whereas there is no recovery at the instance of the applicant. 4. On instruction, the learned APP, states that besides the present case the applicant has a clean record. Looking to all these facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. Applicant - Pravin Chandrakant Talpe be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/-(Rs.Fifteen Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Kolshewadi police station, Kalyan once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)