IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930 CRP.No. 475 of 2004() --------------------- OPEA.206/2002 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ALAPPUZHA. .................... REVN. PETITIONER/ 1ST RESPONDENT ----------------------------------- POWER GRIND CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., LOCAL OFFICE, NANGIARKULANGARA, KAYAMKULAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. SUSY CHACKO, CHACKOLITHARAYIL HOUSE, BHARANICKAVU MURI, KATTANAM VILLAGE. 2. SONIA RACHEL CHACKO, DO.DO.DO. ADV. SRI.PHILIP M.VARUGHESE FOR R1 & R2 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. --------------------------- C.R.P.NO.475 OF 2004 ---------------------------- DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2009 O R D E R The lst respondent in O.P.(E.A)No.206/02 on th file of the Additional District Judge, Alappuzha is the revision petitioner. The court below on consideration of the questions involved, passed a decree granting additional compensation of Rs.20,816/- with interest at 6% per annum. Towards the diminution in land value the court below awarded Rs.10,800/- and the balance amount was awarded towards additional compensation for the trees cut and removed. On going through the materials relied on by the court below including the oral evidence of PW-1 and the reasons stated for doing so, I am of the view that the compensation awarded and re-determined by the court below is reasonable and just. In the result, the revision petition is without merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.