1 ndm 18 caf.2228.10 anr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2228 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2229 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2007 Kamalakar Kashinath Vaity. ... APPLICANT Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ... RESPONDENT -------- Mr. Krishna N. Kore for the Applicant. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, AGP, for the Respondent. -------- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 07 th July, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. 2 Although, the grievance made in the application is that the order dated 19 th March, 2010 runs counter to the order dated 28 th November, 2009, we are not inclined to entertain this application for the 2 simple reason that we are not giving precedence to Land Acquisition matters for final hearing. That is so because as of now the appeals pertaining to that category of year 1997 are on final hearing board. There is no exceptional circumstance why this appeal should be given precedence over such matters, which are pending in large number. The learned counsel for the Applicant in all fairness submits that none of the parties in the present appeal is a senior citizen. If so, we see no reason to give precedence to this matter over pending old appeals of the same category. Hence, applications are rejected. [ A.A. SAYED, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]