In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1624 of 1995 Date of decision: February 26, 2009 Des Raj Garg ... Petitioner Vs. Lachhman Dass (now deceased) represented by his L.Rs. ... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the parties. A.N. Jindal, J Having examined the impugned orders, both the courts below after appreciating the evidence in right perspective have taken a reasonable view. The same does not suffer from any irregularity much less illegality resulting into miscarriage of justice. Consequently, no interference in the impugned orders are called for. Resultantly, the instant petition being unmerited is dismissed. (A.N. Jindal) Judge February 26, 2009 deepak