IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1069 of 2011 1. Shyam Chandra Prasad, Son of late Ram Keshwar Sao 2. Urmila Devi, wife of Shyam Chandra Prasad Both residents of village Baigunia Colliery Road, A-G-M. quarter, Near Water Tank, P.O. and P.S. Barakar, District Burdwan (W.B.) ……………Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Archana Kumari, D/o Sri Kedar Prasad, W/o Pankaj Kumar at present resident of Mohalla Nai Sarak, Mauliganj, Ander Gaya, P.S. Civil Lines, District Gaya …. Opposite Parties. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P. ---- 2 13.01.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph no. 1 in regard to provisions of law under which the petitioners are being prosecuted. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offences punishable under sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 is a retired teacher and aged about 2 62 years and is father-in-law whereas petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the complainant and is a lady aged about 60 years and the allegations are general and omnibus against the accused persons. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioners, namely, Shyam Chandra Prasad and Urmila Devi in the event of arrest or surrender by them within four weeks, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 65 of 2008 (Tr. No. 1875 of 2010), subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)