5) In the Hon'ble Hish Court of Chhattissarh, Bilaspur. W.P.No...^°^.....2006 SJNSlESENen Petitioner Ashok Singh Verma Aged 35 years, S/o Heman Siagh Vemia, »tt»aA-Instmctor, Abhyudaya Bal Shramik Shala, Bhilai. S^Vr "J54-»tt Versus Respondents 1 .--v'?"'}-'^ u'-' i<-&10 ^5. • ^%/f ^&^ ^^ . 6. ..-•'"^y ^•y/^ ^y H.l f ^ The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Diirg Pariyojaaa Director (S.D.M.) District Bal Shramik Kalyaa Samiti, Shri Pulak Bhattacharya, Naib Tahsildar, Durg. - Madhu Memorial Tmst, Through- Sri Sushant Pandit, 39/2, Nehru Nagar East, Bhilai. 'DSSH-SW Through - Sushant Pandit. ffl^- Vidya Yadav, Pratiman Bal Shramik Shala, Kasaridhih, Durg. Date ofAppoinfaiient- In 2005 Kiran Dewangan, Maitri Bal Shramik Shala, Maroda Tank, 6^|<u fr/W^i^ Date ofAppintment- September 2004. rte^. Smt. Farjana Anjum, SchoolIncharge, "Abhyudaya Bal Shramik Shala" Mother Teresa Nagar, Camp-I, Bhilai Nagar. Now at - "Deep Mala Shramik Bal Shala" Chhaoni, Bhilai. P-tfl-1- •- S> V^ 2'Le— y Writ Petition Under Artides 226^27 of The Constitution Of India for the issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and^oiLother suitable writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions. XI-HC-78 ^mwt fhW* 3^^iraRw, oTntf'is,fSiciiyy< .^•.T^S.OSS.^.— ^^200^ 311^1 ia<»>(l^tgg^r) sn^TqirR-fi'b TOT3n^?Ti»i*iIqi '\ Soma WiTWHfersn^T counset Ifor the 29-6-2006 Mr. SomkantVerma, Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Go') No.1,2 & 3, on advancecopy. Heard. The case of the petitioner i) against the vacant post of Educ4t District Child Labour Welfare petitioner has been removed whereas already two posts are School" and "Aadarsh Bal Shramik to the best of his ability.with devotioh Therefore, learned counsel may be allowed to make a repre4e directedto decide the representetio[ objection. Having heard iearned couns( facts and circumstances of the c^s representation to respondent No.3| respondent No.3 is directed to accordance with law, within a perio^ With the direction aforesaid, )h Sn viewofthisorder, M.(W.)F|.i Parties are entitled for certifield case deciBe <Di<ifei<n-f *iiinT^''fel<!) <Rl^l< ^sri^iTsn^T petitioner. ^t. Advocate for the State/respondents ^ ttiat he wasappointed on honorarium (tional Instructor by the Project OfRcer, i, Durgvide Annexure P-4. Nowthe the said post under Annexure P-1, vacant in Maroda Station "Nava Deep ihala, Risalj". The petitioner has worked and sincerity. the petitionersubmits that the petitioner [entation to respondent No.Sand he be to which learned Govt. Advocate has no Comrliittee froiln lyir|9 fiiir for the parties and having regard to the |se, the petitioner is ailowed to make a within 15 days from today and in turn, the representation on ite own merits, in of 30 days from the date of its receipt. [he petition stands disposed of. I.No.2355/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofit)isorder. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge '^