IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2011 / 31ST ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2253 of 2011() ------------------------------------- CRIME NO.474/2009 OF KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DIST. .............. PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------- ANILKUMAR @ AJISH , S/O.ALEXANDER AGED 27 YEARS, ABHILASH SADANAM, AVALUKKUNNU P.O., ARYAD PANCHAYATH, KOMALAPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM CRIME NO.474/2009 OF KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. ABDUL SAMAD @ BINU S/O.SULAIMAN KUNJU, PANIPPURA THARAYIL VEEDU WARD NO.35, KAYAMKULAM MURI, KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA. 3. ADABIYA, W/O. SULAIMAN KUNJU PANIPPURA THARAYIL VEEDU, WARD NO.35, KAYAMKULAM MURI, KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.M.R. VENUGOPAL. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs Crl.MC.No. 2253 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-I: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.474/2009. ANNEXURE-II: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SUBMITED BY RESPONDENT NO.2. ANNEXURE-III: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENT NO.3. RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs B.P.RAY, J. Crl.M.C.NO.2253 of 2011 Dated this the 22nd day of July 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the 1st accused in crime No.474/2009 of Kayamkulam police station now pending as S.C.No.573/2010 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Mavelikkara for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 452, 308, 324, 323, 354, 427 I.P.C and Section 27(b) & 27(2) of the Arms Act. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the de facto complainant. It is stated that the matter has been settled out of court and the parties want to lead a happy life. 3. It is settled law that if the parties have settled disputes between themselves, no useful purpose will serve by keeping the case pending for trial. If the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 make a statement before the court below on or before 08/08/2011 to the effect that the matter is settled between themselves and the court below is satisfied that the matter has been settled between the parties, in that event, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge shall close the matter. CRL.M.C.No.2253/2011 2 The Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. (sd/-) (B.P.RAY, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge CRL.M.C.No.2253/2011 3 CRL.M.C.No.2253/2011 4 CRL.M.C.No.2253/2011 5