HJGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR @ W. P.(S)No. 1973 of 2007 PetiConer Versus Respondenls 1. 2. Dr. S.M. Gh<Balkar, aged abcwt 55 years, S/o Shri Madhutor Ghosalkar, Occupation - Govemmant Sewant (Wtocatod Doctor to State of M.P.)fVo 101/157 Kanishka Apartment, Dhanvanlari Nagar, P.0. Rajendra Nagar, (ndore M.P. State of ChhatUsgarh, Through The Secretary. Public Health and Family Welfare Departonent, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Heatth Services, Raipur C.G. SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri Rajesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 2ml day of April, 2007) 1. The petitioner, who was working as Medteal Officer, at CommunUy Health Center, Charama, District Kanker (Chhattisgarh) was allocated to the State of Macthya Pradesh on mutual tesis vide order dated 4.5.2(%)6 (Annexure P/1). The petitioner has preferred this petition, being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of ttie respondents for not relieving him to join his duties in 8ie Steto of Madhya Pradesh in pursuance of the atlocation <rf his services to the State of Madhya Pradesh. 2. Thereafter, the petitioner was relieved from his place of woridng vide order dated 27.7.20)6 (Annexure P/2) to report to the respondent No.2. Pursuant to the order dated 27.7.2006 the petitioner reported before the respondent No.2 on 1.8.20)6 •[;- ' •? (Annexure P/5), but even after submisston of representafion the petJGoner has not been retieved by the r^pondents/State of Chhattisgarh to join in ttie State of Madhya Pradesh. 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the petifioner submits that there is no reason why ttie respondents are not relieving the p^ittoner. Learned counsel for the petifioner further submits that about 10 months have been passed since the passing of the allocafion order and other similarly situated doctors have already been reliewed, therefore, the action of the respondente cannot be sakt to be justified. 4. In the resutt, the writ petiCon is allowed. The responctents are dir«Aedto relieve fte petifioner in order to enable him to join his duties in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge n