1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 139 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1785 OF 2010 Kisan Bhaga Rasal & another .... APPELLANTS V E R S U S Balu Trimbak Sangale & others .... RESPONDENTS Mr.H.D.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 08/04/2010 PER COURT : 1. This Letters Patent Appeal takes exception to the Order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 24/3/2010 in Writ Petition No. 1992 of 2010. 2. The appellant before us was a Writ Petitioner in the aforesaid Writ Petition before the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge found that the petitioners had presented a Suit claiming Decree of perpetual injunction and in the said Suit an application had been filed seeking interim injunction during the pendency of the Suit. The application filed by the petitioners came to be rejected by the trial Court and the order of the trial Court came to be confirmed by the appellate Court on an Appeal being presented by the petitioners. In the light of the concurrent findings of facts recorded by the two Courts below, the learned Single Judge felt it appropriate to delve with the factual aspect of the case and accordingly dismissed the petition. 2 3. We have heard Mr. H.D.Deshmukh, learned counsel for the appellants with whose assistance we have perused the order of the learned Single Judge. Upon such perusal, we do not notice any perversity in the order of the learned Single Judge to justify any interference in this Letters Patent Appeal. Consequently, this Letters Patent Appeal fails and is dismissed. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/LPA 139.10 in WP 1785.10