S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9009/2008 Ms Jaswinder Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 11.12.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Ramesh Purohit for Ms Suman Porwar, for the petitioner/s. Mr Shyam Toshniwal, for the respondents. ... The controversy involved in this petition for writ is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Vishnu Kunwar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. dated 21.11.2008. Accordingly, this petition for writ is also allowed in the terms of the judgment referred above. The respondents are directed to consider the period consumed by the petitioner in undergoing training necessary for appointment as Prabodhak, the period of leave sanctioned or the leave availed for the reasons beyond control as part of teaching experience acquired. The period aforesaid is also not required to be considered as break in service. As such, the respondents should act expeditiously to give effect to the select list relating to the petitioner and also relating to the persons similarly situated, as far as possible within a period of one and half month from today by giving appointment to her, if she is otherwise eligible. It shall be open for the respondents to demand original documents and other relevant facts from the petitioner to get satisfied about her claim for the period relating to teaching experience and leave in question. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '