IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4007 of 2006 SARYUG SINGH SON OF LATE RAM BHAJU SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHURAPUR, P.S. TEGHRA, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, WIRELESS, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 3 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that the pension of the petitioner, who retired as Sub-Inspector of Police on 30th April, 2000, has been fixed on the salary of Rs. 7487.50 which would be appearing from the pension payment order issued by the Accountant General as contained in Annexure-2 whereas the petitioner’s monthly salary before his retirement was Rs. 8300/- which would be appearing on perusal of the letter contained in memo no. 1336 dated 23rd May, 2000 issued by the Assistant Inspector General of Police (Wireless). Learned counsel for the Accountant General submits that in this regard letter dated 21st of April, 2006 as contained in Annexure-A to the counter affidavit was sent to the department requesting to clarify the claim of the petitioner that he was receiving his salary of Rs. 8300 prior to this retirement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering financial loss regularly, and as - 2 - such, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration if any of the claim or part of the claims is found not admissible the same shall be informed to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)