CR No. 3066 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No. 3066 of 2009 Date of decision May 26, 2009 Dr. Dev Batra ....... Petitioner Versus Paramjit Singh and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The request by the revision petitioner is for grant of one opportunity to examine the official witness for whom he has taken process fee (Annexure P-1 and P-2). The Court has directed the case to be adjourned to 29.5.2009 for examination of RW-1 and RW-2 only, apart from the respondent before him. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the order that restricts him to examine only three witnesses when he has already paid the diet charges for six more witnesses, would amount to denying to him adequate opportunity to examine all the witnesses that are necessary for proper conduct of the trial. Without going into the merits of the contentions, I direct the Rent Controller to give one more opportunity after the examination of witnesses RW-1 and RW-2 and the respondent. 2. The Civil revision is disposed of at the stage of admission itself having due consideration for early conduct of the trial and CR No. 3066 of 2009 2 not to stall the proceedings by the mere pendency of the Civil revision. 3. The Civil revision is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 26, 2009 archana