[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.399 OF 2005 Smt.Pratibha Vithoba Undir ..Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai and Ors. ..Respondents ... None for Petitioner Ms.T.Puranik for Respondent No.1 Mr.U.J.Makhija Senior Counsel i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for Respondent No.2 ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. We have perused the order dated 24.6.2005 and we find that the Court in para 7 has disposed of the petition. The same is also reflected in para 3 of the order dated 29.8.2005. However, we also find that on 15.7.2005 para 7 of the order was corrected whereby the sentence "The Petition is consequently disposed of" was deleted. 2. As none present for the Petitioner, petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]