1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2790/2011 [The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Chamorshi .vrs. The State of Maharashtra and others] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : JULY 05, 2011. Heard Shri S.S. Ghate, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Bharti Dangre, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. Advocate Shri Ghate has contended that after exoneration in earlier two inquiries, again under political pressure, one more inquiry has been ordered. He further states that outcome of earlier inquiry is already being looked into by this Court in Writ Petition No.2519/2011 which has been admitted for final disposal and interim relief is given to the petitioner– APMC, Chamorshi. In alternative, he also states that Divisional Joint Registrar is not competent to exercise powers u/s 43 of the Maharashtra 2 Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. Learned AGP, invites attention to Notification of delegation having No. APM. 2081/36340/440/11-C published in Government Gazette on 17.9.1981, to urge that by exercising powers u/s 58 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, those powers have delegated to Divisional Joint Registrar. It is further pointed out that while admitting Writ Petition No.2519/2011, this Court has permitted State Government to conduct inquiry with rider that no action on the basis of findings recorded therein will be initiated without leave of the court. We have perused order dated 1.7.2011 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2519/2011. We find that the petitioner has been sufficiently protected by the last part of that order. Hence, with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps depending upon the outcome/progress of inquiry, the petition stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande