IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.3022 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 02, 2011 Naib Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr.Jagraj Singh Khiva, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is accused to have connived with the co- accused in cheating the complainant for a sum of ` 10.00 lacs on the pretext that he would be sent to America. As per the evidence, petitioner took the complainant to Calcutta where he himself was got arrested for a fake passport, whereas the complainant was made to fly to Thailand and then subsequently to some other countries where the complainant was arrested and on return had approached the petitioner and others for return of his money. The petitioner alongwith his co-accused did not pay any heed leading to registration of the case and final conviction and award of sentence. The petitioner has been convicted by the trial Court which order has been upheld by the Appellate Court as well. The only submission made by the counsel for the petitioner is that no money was paid to the petitioner. There is no explanation forthcoming, however, to show as to why the petitioner took the complainant to Calcutta if he was not the conniving party. The conviction is based on evidence. Accordingly, no case for interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. December 02, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE