r.\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. (' r^ .'">. /200'C PETITIONER ^AV /. (Px'5^1- Va<7l^-^< ^^y^<^5 '.^•^^ \^ vss ^ Smt. Reena Pillai, wife of Shr^-S.P. Pillai, aged about 37 years, resident of Qtr No. 231/A, Street Avenue, C. Sector I, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh), occupation - Lady Constable, C.I.S.F. Unit, BSP, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^\. Union of India, through - Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. ^2, ^sr^, ^ys2f '^".cSy^ ''^•"'''.^y.^" ^:.S<?^''AC&ly' / -"^ The Director General Central Industrial Security Force, (C.I.S.F.), Hea'd Quarter Lodhi Road, CGO Complex, New Delhi. D.I.G., C.I.S.F., Bhilai, Steel Plant, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Commandant (ADM) C.I.S.F., Unit BSP Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 XI-HC-22 111WI ShHlch 3ST -^wwi, aTfly'ie, Rtdlti^< 3)1^1 4s<<^ ,..l/.V.;.R;J. *<•*-* t^)*i»*^ 2005" sn^T^r' f^fNisn^T sh*)W RiHf?(T W^l <+dlSKflf^T °ni<<[<i'41-f *iwdTfftei^tri^sR ^srf^TSfl^T 29.3.2005 Smt. Hameeda Siddique, Shri R. Pradhan,counsel Heard on admission. The petitioner, who is \ hds filed this writ petition,'< 4.3.2005(Annexur®P- 1) by wt from Bhikti to Sou-th West Zc 34 of document, AnnexureP- Learned counsel for 1h< is a tady ond her husband is a| Phnt. She also submits that aged about 9 years dnd 5 y^u petitioner is transferred family shall be dislurbed. S/t reasons, -the petitioner met| representation, Annexure P-6) hos refused to receive the I have heard the \eam^d It is not disputed transferable post. It is als^) |counsel for the petitioner. Ifor Union oflndia. ^orking as Constable in CISF Unit, Bhilai (hatlenging •the validity of order dated tich her services have been transferred |ne. l-1er name finds ptace at serial No. petitioner submits that the petltioner |so working as Chargeman in Bhilai Steel •(he petitioner h<we two 2 smallchildren She further submits that if the Bhilai to the said Zone, her entire (he furlher submits that for all these with respondent No. 2 alongwith the dated 9.3.2005, but re^ondent No. 2 rej^resen'tation. y^ars frdm tltiat counal at length. Ihe petitioner is working on the not disputed •Hiat the tronsfer is an ^' XI-HC-22 /?. /, 3 T ^WM^, BTfiu'lis, Rldiyy SilWl <^ach *1|t)MI Sb*4(^ sn^r^r Rawan^T a?EiR?flf®T ^1» S.Ulu'ti an^rgTdTwgfstT .- -2-- incidence of service and the san^e cannot be interfered by -the Court unless it is challenged on the considerations or it is shown to Igrounds of matafide or extroneous ^e in violation of any rule and the law. So far as •the personal diffict^lties are concemed, these are the matters to be considere^J by employees and for his/her •fomil services comfortably. This Coi petition. However, as leamed couna •riie representation has not be^ representation will be received disposed of in accordonce with| representation alongwith certi be allowed to continue on the sa theendof 29th April 20)5. The petition stonds finall)) disposed of. C.C. os per rules. «hi<<fa41-f>iiii'iTfffei<g <.fq(^i< ^srf^Tsn^T the empt^er for welfare of its ' so -that he/she may render his/her rt- is not inctined to entertain this for the petitioner has stated that ;n received, it is directed that the •y the respondent No.2 caid it riioll be bw as early as possible, preferably within a period of 1 month frojn the date of filing/receipt of the ied copy of this order and writ petition. In the meantime, if thie pe^itioner has not been relieved, die will d phce for a period of 1 monlti, \js. by -_6_ Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge _i^il@a)_. w