WP(C) 6282/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. SAIKIA Sharma, J Heard Mr. Z. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.S. Deka, learned State Counsel as well as Mr. S.S. Dey, learned Standing Coun sel, Gauhati High Court. Having regard to the nature of grievance raise and as a greed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at the motion stage itself. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of the Annexure-20 order d ated 27.7.2011 issued by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Kokrajhar disp ensing with the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 1.8.2011 on the ground of ther e being no excess work. Be it stated here that till then, the petitioner had bee n working as Copyist pursuant to his engagement vide order dated 3.1.2004 (Annex ure-6). It is the case of the petitioner that since he had rendered about 8 year s of service in the establishment of District & Sessions Judge, Kokrajhar withou t any break and blemish, it was his expectation that his services would be regul arized. It is the further stand of the petitioner that since he is ready to work in any capacity, the learned District & Sessions Judge ought to have considered his case for engagement in any other work, if works pertaining to copying is no t available in the establishment. The petitioner has referred to the engagement of the respondent No.4 in the said establishment as Dustman / Cleaner on casual basis on lumpsum salary of Rs. 300 0/- per month vide order dated 30.9.2011, which is after the dispensation of the services of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, he is ready to work in any capacity in the said establishment. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of providing that the learne d District & Sessions Judge, Kokrajhar may explore the possibility of engaging t he petitioner in any job as per the requirement of the establishment. This order , we have passed, considering the fact that the petitioner had been working in t he establishment for long 8(eight) years as Copyist. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, without howev er, any order as to costs.