IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.494 of 2011 Nagendra Roy, son of Sri Ram Bilash Rai, resident of village- Mirampur, P.S.-Raghopur, District- Vaishali. …..Petitioner Versus Shyam Sundar Devi,, wife of Sri Nagendra Prasad Rai, resident of village-Mirampur, P.S.-Raghopur, District- Vaishali. ………Opposite Party ----------- 2. 16.11.2011 This application has been filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 7.02.2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Matrimonial Case No.20/2008 by which with consent of both the parties, the interim maintenance allowance of Rs.4000/-per month has been granted for the maintenance of his wife-opposite party and his minor son. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is ready to lead conjugal life with the opposite party and he is also ready for one time settlement. It appears from the impugned order that both the parties have been heard on the point of interim maintenance and with consent of both the parties, Rs.4000/-per month has been fixed as interim maintenance 2 to be paid by the petitioner to his wife. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner is at liberty to take steps for conciliation before the learned Principal Magistrate where the maintenance case is pending. In the result, this revision application stands disposed of. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)