IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.772 of 1991 Date of Decision.09.09.2011 Surinder Kumar Mittal, Advocate, District Court, Faridkot .....Petitioner Versus Maruti Udyog Limited, Gurgaon through its Sales Manager and another .....Respondents Present: None for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The prayer in the writ petition is for allotment of a maruti car in a preferential quota. 2. The writ petition has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 09, 2011 Pankaj*