1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9592/2007 {Rajendra Kumar Lashkary Versus Ghanshyam Lodwal & Others} Date of Order :: 14th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Kaleem Ahmed Khan for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The plaintiff – petitioner filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of disputed property in the trial court alongwith an application for temporary injunction which was dismissed by the trial court. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred but without success. Hence this writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the plaintiff petitioner. 3. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and also the reasons assigned by both the courts below for rejecting the application for temporary injunction filed by the petitioner and after considering the same, I find that both the 2 courts below have recorded a concurrent finding in respect of prima – facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in favour of the defendants and against the petitioner. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said orders so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK 3