IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31163 of 2010 RAMANAND YADAV, S/o Late Gohal Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 13.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 326, 307 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 IPC was added and Sections 25(1-B) A, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioner has remained absconding for about five years, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a reasonable time. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for reasons of commitment or framing of charge and in case it is done this Court shall not consider the prayer of the petitioner. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)