IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 474 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.1.2009 Hardeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus Punjab Agro Food Grains Corporation and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. R.S. Modi, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by learned District Judge, Sangrur, dated November 26, 2008, in an appeal filed by respondent No.2 whereby interim stay has been granted. The appeal is stated to be listed for February 18, 2009 which is filed against the order passed by the learned trial Court in an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of delay, the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss as the entire paddy will be milled in the meantime and there would be no paddy left to be given to the petitioner for milling. He is entitled to the same as per the Policy of Government of Punjab. Considering the fact that the appeal against the interim order is still pending before the learned Court below, I do not find any reason to interfere at this stage. However, the learned District Judge, is directed to decide the appeal pending before it for February 18, 2009, on the next date of hearing. The Revision petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 29.1.2009 JUDGE Reema