1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5046 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5046 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5046 OF 2003 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5045 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5045 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5045 OF 2003 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2003. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2003. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2003. The Regional Director, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, Mumbai. : Applicant. versus. Mr.Rajendra Bhandari & ors. : Respondents. Mr.H.V.Mehta for the applicant. Mrs.S.M.Poddar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.D.R.More, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 13th August 2004. DATED : 13th August 2004. DATED : 13th August 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Mehta for the applicant and 2 2 2 Mrs.Poddar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 37 days. Mrs.Poddar initially contended that there is a delay of more than six months even in obtaining certified copy. However, when her attention was drawn to Section 378 (5) of the Cr.P.C. as per which six months time is granted where the complainant is a public servant, she did not press her objection. Consequently, the application for delay condonation is allowed. Delay is condoned. Put the appeal for admission. **************