mm ua 200 ‘m-‘m (W) WWiwm //, WP gsllNO. 3571 OF 2005 Petitioners v 1. Bal Krishna Patel, Son of Shri Tarachand Patcl, Aged 36 ears, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher S condary School, Kotami (D) Block Dabhaxa, istrict Janjgeer Champa. 2. Jeev n Lal Naik, Son of Shn' Jhanak Ram Naik, Age about 38 yeals, Head Master, Middle School, vt. Higher Secondaxy School, Kotaim' (D) Block abhara, Dis1n'ct Janjgeer Champa; Respondents 1. State of adhya Pladesh, Through Secretary, Minjsuy f School, Educau’on Department, Mantralaya Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. ‘ bh'c Vlnsiruction, Satpuda Bhawan, 3. Director, Public Insu’uction, Pension Bada, Raipur., 2. Director, :\ Bhopal. 4. Disuict Educaiion Omcer, Education Departmenl, Dishict JanjgeerrGhampa. bra, J 8.3 Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mi 27.1.2009 v Mr. Roop Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner. x Mrs. Smita Ghai, learned PI for the State. Grievance of the petitioners is that they were appointed as Upper , Division Teacher vide order of Amexure A] 1. Thereafter, the Upper Division Teachers were":promoted to the post of Lecturer vide order dated 13/ 14. 12. 1999. However, petitioners’ names were not included r“ k WWWW—Fswswl 1 /2oos*1,oo,ooo. R a / ' v ‘ xf;HC_—7s mm.. W 200, > mm’qafga‘gu) mwfaw ammm u WW WW %aifanemé31 Wmm m—-m~a-———- in the above promotion orde , Whemas, their juniors were promoted. exuxe A/2 has been passed without The impugned order of considering the case of the pe 'tioners. V Learned counsel for e petitioners submits that he is not pmssing this petition at this e, however, he maybe permitted to file a nesh representation bef 1e respondent No.3 raising all their gzievances, raised in this pe ' 'on and the same may be directed to be deoided Within a specined pe od. Mrs. Smita Ghai, 1e ed counsel appearing for the State submits that in case the petitioners iile a nesh representation for redressal of their grievances raised in this petition before respondent No.3, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of six weeks from the date of receip of the representau'on. In View of above sub ions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is dispos ‘d of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation along with certined copy of this order before respondent No.3 raising all eir grievances raised in this petiiion. On such representation being m !de, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the said representation in aiccordance with law, on its own merits, Within a period of six weleks from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra 3 Judge