IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-5329 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 6.7.2009 Rajbir Singh … Petitioner Versus The State of Harayan and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mrs.Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Sr.DAG, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the jail at Rohtak is overcrowded at the moment and the petitioner cannot be accommodated in the said jail. Learned counsel has referred to the reply filed on behalf of the respondent-State, in support of his contention. However, learned State counsel submits that case of the petitioner for transfer to District Jail Rohtak shall be considered as and when it is found that he can be accommodated in the said jail. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as such. [ Rajan Gupta ] Judge 06.7.2009 sd