IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 958 of 2011 Date of Decision: May 16, 2011 Kamal Mahato ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Swaraj Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Deswal, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ for the release of detenues as mentioned in Head note of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No. 5 and 6. Learned State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of Chander Prakash, District Magistrate, Jhajjar and the same is taken on record. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous as all the alleged detenues have since been released. Reply filed by District Magistrate, Jhajjar is also to the same effect. In view of the abovesaid reply and statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further action is required to be taken at this stage. Hence, the instant petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. May 16, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE