IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19981 of 2010 1. PRAMOD PRASAD, S/o Dhanpat Sah. 2. Chandra Prakash, S/o Dhanpat Sah. 3. Dhanpat Sah, S/o Uchit Sah. 4. Sudama Devi @ Lalita Devi, W/o Dhanpat Sah. 5. Ramesh Kumar, S/o Dhanpat Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 14.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The submission is that the petitioner Nos. 3 & 4 are the parents-in-law of the complainant whereas the petitioner Nos. 1, 2 & 5 are her brothers- in-law and there is no specific overt act alleged against them. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioners, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1594 of 2009 (Tr. No. 3737 of 2010), they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari Sadar subject to 2 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)