1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2263 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Ms.Anupa T. Tanna, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the appellant. Mr.Niraj Sheth i/by Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 8th Ferbuary, 2010. P.C. : 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the issues in the Appeal are covered against the Revenue by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers P.Ltd., [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421 (Bom). 2. In these circumstances, in view of the statement made, the Appeal does not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)