IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 22044 of 2008(Y) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.A.PAULSON, S/O.ANTONY, AGED 60 YEARS, MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, POOCHETTY, IRVAVIMANGALAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. PANANCHERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO.541, PATTIKKAD, P.O, PATTIKKAD-680 652, THRISSUR DISTRICT,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THRISSUR. 3. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD, P.B.NO.85, KALA NIVAS, T.C.NO.27/156, 157,CHINMAYA LANE, KUNNUMPURAM, NEAR AYURVEDA COLLEGE, TRIVANDRUM-1. R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.MOHANAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.22044 of 2008-Y = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2008. JUDGMENT The third respondent appears through standing counsel. Learned Senior Government Pleader takes notice for the second respondent. Notice to the first respondent is dispensed with preserving its right to move this Court for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. Having regard to the fact that repeated demand notices issued by the third respondent have not been honoured, the Scheme and the Act in question provide for revenue recovery proceedings. The third respondent has to take recourse to such proceedings and the revenue recovery authorities have to promptly enforce it with all vigilance because the inflow is for the purpose of sustaining a social WP(C)22044/2008 -: 2 :- security measure of providing pension to those who retired from the co-operative sector. Hence, it is directed that the third respondent shall do the needful in terms of what is stated above and ensure that the case of the petitioner is finalised within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/230708