1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1531 of 2007 GYAN VIKASH PRASAD son of Sri Deep Narayan Prasad, resident of village Kali Asthan Maksudpur, P.S.Kasim Bazar,District Munger … … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sri Deepak Kumar, Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. Sri Manoranjan Chaturvedi,Director-in- Chief, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. Sri Amrendra Narayan Singh, Additional Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. Sri Chandra Bhushan Singh, Deputy Director, Health Services(Training), Bihar, Patna 6. Sri K. Santhil, District Magistrate, Munger 7. Sri Arun Kumar Keshari, Additional Chief Medical Officer, Munger … … Opp. Parties For the petitioner: Mr. D.K.Sinha, Sr. Adv. For the Opp. Parties: Mr. S.K.Sharma ----------- 4. 29.4.2009 Heard the parties. The stand of the respondents in the show cause is that they have complied with the judgment and order of the Division Bench passed in L.P.A. No. 946 of 2003 and other analogous cases. In proof they have annexed as Annexure-A, a copy of order of posting of several employees including the petitioner 2 dated 20th September, 2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before his dismissal the petitioner had been promoted from the post of Vaccinator to clerk but he has been again taken into service but posted only as vaccinator. A further grievance has been raised that the respondents have not complied with the order of the L.P.A. Bench inasmuch as they have not furnished any copy of the decision taken in respect of the petitioner’s case. In the facts of the case, we are satisfied that no case is made out for initiating a contempt proceeding. The contempt petition is, therefore, finally disposed of. The concerned respondents are directed to make available to the petitioner a copy of their decision. If that decision is against the claim of the petitioner that he should be reinstated on the post of clerk then the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge that through appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. If the decision is in 3 his favour and he has been wrongly posted on the post of vaccinator, then the concerned authorities will rectify their mistake and post the petitioner on the post of clerk without delay, preferably within two moths. ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.) Kanth