IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 841 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25/08/2008 in WP NO : 8495 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The General Manager, Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, 2 The Chief General Manager, Telecom, Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited, Hyderabad - 500001. 3 The Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited, Rep. by the Director General, New Delhi. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND M. Laxmipathi, S/o Kanakaiah, O/o General Manager, Telecom District, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:DR.P.BHASKARA MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.P.NAVEEN RAO The Court made the following : The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No :841 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) The respondents in W.P.No:8495 of 2004, challenge the order dated 25th August, 2008 passed by the learned single Judge disposing of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the writ petitioner in terms of the scheme dated 7.11.1989 for temporary status and regularization. At this stage, before going into the merits of the case, it is pertinent to note that the Assistant General Manager (Legal) has filed an affidavit on behalf of the appellants, wherein it has been stated at paragraph-7 as under: “I humbly submit that this writ appeal is filed against the orders of the learned single Judge passed in W.P.No:8495 of 2004, dated 25.8.2008 and this judgment was rendered following the above referred order dated 7.6.2008 made in W.P.No:24783 of 2004. The order in W.P.No:24783 of 2004 was modified by a Division Bench of this Honourable Court in W.A.No:1805 of 2008 dated 11.12.2008. Since the said order has been complied with by the appellants and since the issue is same in W.P.No:8495 of 2008 also against which this writ appeal has been filed, the appellants herein undertake to reconsider the case of the respondent herein afresh in accordance with the Rules for grant of Temporary status and regularization to the respondent herein and pass appropriate orders in pursuance of the orders of the Division Bench of this Honourable Court in W.A.No:1805 of 2008 and W.A.No:1661 of 2008 dated 11.12.2008” In this regard, the learned counsel for the respondent-writ petition is heard. In view of the undertaking given in paragraph-7 of the above affidavit filed on behalf of the appellants, We feel it just and proper to dispose of the writ appeal in terms of paragraph-7 of the affidavit. Accordingly, this writ appeal is disposed of in terms of paragraph-7 of the above affidavit filed on behalf of the appellants ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ______________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar Dated: 03.07. 2009 Gurc/dvs. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO :841 OF 2009 (Division Bench Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) 3rd July, 2009