IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17958 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ O.H.NAUSHAD, ONATHIL HOUSE KADUVAMOOZHY ERATTUPETTA P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT , DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE , TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE ERATTUPETTA GRAMAPANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ERATTUPETTA P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST. 3. HAMSAKUTTY, TRACTER DRIVER, ERATTUPETTA GRAMAPANCHAYATH OFFICE, ERATTUPETTA PO KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.MOHAMMED YOUSUF FOR R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P2- THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 9.4.07 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).17958/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 5th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner was appointed as Tractor driver in the second respondent, Panchayat, on 19.10.2005, on daily wage basis as evidenced by Ext.P1. Apparently, his services were later dispensed with and instead, the third respondent is appointed, again on a daily wage basis. Petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 representation before the Government. The only direction which could be issued in this case is one to the Government to consider Ext.P3. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation and issue a reply thereto to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs