Criminal Misc.-M No. 19301 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 19301 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.9.2011 Bane Singh @ Binny .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Gaurav G. S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. While granting interim bail to the petitioner on 8.8.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner in the FIR is that on enquiry it was found by the complainant that the fields from where the tractor-trolleys were loaded with Yamuna Retti, belong to the petitioner, which is factually incorrect. He further submitted that in other FIR registered against the petitioner subsequent to the FIR in question, also the allegations are that Yamuna Retti was loaded in the tractor trolley on the asking of the petitioner. He submitted that the tractor trolleys are not owned by the petitioner and he is not the owner of the place, from where the tractor trolleys were recovered.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already joined investigation. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner was instrumental in selling Yamuna Retti on charging ` 700/- per trolley. The drivers were arrested from the spot and they have been released on regular bail. Criminal Misc.-M No. 19301 of 2011 [2] Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. The interim bail granted to the petitioner on 8.8.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 7.9.2011 mk