1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 409 of 2009 IN Criminal Appeal No. of 2009 [The State of Mah. Vs. Shankar B. Mukawar & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for appellant. Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 13th April, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. The order of acquittal is based on discussion and findings contained in the Judgment, which can be summarized as follows:- [1] Though income of the son was included, he was not arrayed as accused. [2] The Investigating Officer did not produce latest Statements of Assets & Liabilities of the accused. [3] The valuation of various assets 2 of the accused is not done correctly and legally, and in the result, proof of charge has failed. 3. These findings are not shown to be factually incorrect. 4. Moreover, the learned Special Judge has also found that there was sufficient explanation tendered by the accused explaining their sources of income. 5. In the result, the story of prosecution that the accused were possessing assets more than their known sources of income was not proved. 6. The Judgment and order of acquittal is, thus, based on sound reasons. 7. No indulgence is called for. 8. Application is, therefore, rejected. Judge |Hedau|