C E!?*.l"l llsLi: li'-f^ C^f<jo7- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATISGARH, AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. 62-t 8 OF 2006 Petitioner: .^^ ^^y ,-A- ^' ^ Respondents: Rakesh Kumar, Saxena, Aged about 41 years, S/o Late Kamal Kishore Saxena R/0 C-198, Agya Nagar, Bilaspur Dist. C.G. State. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Departenent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur fC.G.l i^ / 2. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, CGState. ^ 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpat Panchayat, Masturi, Bilaspur Dist. C.G. State. WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT (S), AND/OR ^ORDER (Sl DIRECTION (S) ETC XI-HC-22 sn^r^r i^fwaf^T spri^^tT r^- Ima :^\ 753i ^iraraq, STf)y'i<i, faciidy 3TT^?(RW /^ 1 _.^I..a3..^^. *<lHptl sn*<i«n W]; /200 f2l<>4 311^1 ^WIWHfeT wifepfrrWRffif tecArf^rc ^3lR|IT3I1^T 16.11.2006 Shri KR Nair, counsel f^r -the petitioner. Shri AJay Dwivedi, Pane| Heard. It is contended that a1 tawyer for the State. taking liberty from this Courl- vide order dated 08.02.2006 passejd in WP No.2094/2003, petitioner filed his representation for oppr^priate relief before the Competent Authori-ty, i.e. respondent No.]3 herein, but respondent No.3 has not decided his representation so far. Respondent No.3 is dij-ected to decide the represenlatton dated 31.05.2006 filed by th^ petitioner wilhin a peried of three months from toctay. Thereaf^er, if exigency arises, petttioner may renew his petitton. With the aforesaid direc|'ion, petitton stands dispoaed of. Sdf- V.K. S'nrivastava Judge (^^W) ^^