1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8219 OF 2009 Bharti Arunkumar Patil (deceased through L.R.: Arunkumar Gulabrao Patil, age: 51 years, Occ: service, R/o Ladgaon, Tq. Akole, District Ahmednagar. Petitioner Versus 1 Pravara Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat Sanstha, Akole, Tq.Akole, Dist.Ahmedngar. 2 Gopichand Lahanu Newal, age: 43 years, Occ: Service, R/o Panchayat Samiti (Ed.), Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar. 3 Balu Ambadas Kardile, age: 46 years, Occ: Service, R/o Panchayat Samiti (Ed.), Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, District Ahmedngar. Respondents Mr.V.S.Bedre, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Mr.S.K.Shinde, advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 26th April, 2010. PER COURT : 2 1 A dispute was raised by Respondent-society in respect of recovery of sum from petitioner. The dispute was allowed and award in respect of recovery of amount was passed by the Cooperative Court, Kopargaon. The judgment and award passed by the Cooperative Court, Kopargaon, was subjected to challenge in an appeal bearing No.161 of 2008 presented by Respondent-borrower. Appeal also came to be dismissed in view of the order passed on 22.07.2009. 2 I have perused orders passed by both the Courts below. Shri Bedre, learned Counsel for petitioner, contends that dispute was presented by the Society beyond prescribed period of limitation. On perusal of Section 92 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, it transpires that period of limitation prescribed under Statute is six years and as such, contention raised by petitioner - original borrower, in that regard, is without any substance. The orders passed by both the Courts below are reasonable and proper and do not call for any interference in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3 Writ Petition, therefore, stands dismissed. ( R. M. BORDE) JUDGE adb/wp821909