IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931 RCRev..No. 107 of 2007() ------------------------ RCA.16/2005 of RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY, N. PARAVUR RCP.22/2003 of RENT CONTROL COURT, N.PARAVUR. .................... REV.PETITIONER/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN R.C.P. --------------------------- THOMAS, S/O. VARKEY, AGED 65 YEARS, PANJIKKARAN, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM SRI.S.GOPINATHAN SRI.NELSON ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN R.C.P/2ND RESPONDENT IN RCP ------------------------- 1. CHINNAKANNU PILLAI, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O. KANTHIMATHI PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE (DIED). 2. SUBBAHLAKSHMI AMMAL, AGED 58 YEARS, D/O. KANTHIMATHI PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. 3. ARUL SELVI, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O. RAMASWAMI PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. 4. ARUNKRISHNAN, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O.ARUL SELVI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. 5. KANTHIMATHI, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. POOLAN PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. RCR. No.107/2007 6. MURALI, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O. POOLAN PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. 7. MEERA, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O. POOLAN PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE. 8. MAYA, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O. POOLAN PILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVOOTHARA MURI, PARAVUR VILLAGE, 2ND RESPONDENT IN R.C.P. 9. PADMAVATHY, W/O. CHINNAKKANNUPILLAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, PARAVUR VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.K.P.SOMASUNDARAN NAIR FOR CAVETOR SRI.T.A.SHAJI FOR R5 SMT.T.V.NEEMA FOR R5 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/2/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------ R.C.R. No.107 OF 2007 ------------------------------ Dated this, the 16th day of February, 2010 O R D E R ~~~~~~~~~~~ Pius C. Kuriakose, J. It is submitted by the counsel for the respondents (on behalf of Mr.T.A.Shaji) that possession of the building in question has already been taken by the respondents and hence the Rent Control Revision has become infructuous. We record the above submission and closed the Rent Control Revision as infructuous. The eviction order, which is challenged in the RCR, will not be executed any longer. (PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE) ps