IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETn‘Ioms1 No. (6%:5‘ OF 2006 PETITIONER : /Xashwant Lal Dahre, aged about 37 years, Son of Shri Punauram, Occupation Service, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Tohda, Block Tilda, District Raipur a _. 53°;MM“ o (C.G.). 2. Director, Raipur (C.G.). District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.). Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School Tohda, Block Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.}. p\:\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 ""?"","€r’“‘ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f The petitioner most respectfully states as under:— Chhattisgarh, RESHOHDENTS 2V1 . State of Through Secretary, of School n)/QO[5E= ?1 Education, D.K.S. Bhawan erg“ # a N” gmw I Raipur (co). "b g‘xW‘ XI-HC-78 E W , W , W W W41 :€.'.C&£. ~é .%.%.3.v a 200 c mm/(W) was appointed as Assistant Teac a period of two years. ‘His servic he was given regular salary. The Tubectomy operation on 16.111 and acoordingly Green Card was Abhanpur. As per circular of Anr‘ for two advanced increments, hi given advanced increments des PM for the same and he has be vide memo of Annexure PIT. 1er in the year 1994 on probation for as were regularized on 6.9.1996 and wife of the petitioner had undergone 994 after giving birth to two children issued by the Primary Health Centre, exure P11 the petitioner was entitled )wever, the petitioner has not been )ite his representation of Annexure en-denied the advanced increments On the other hand, learn d 'counsel for the Stateirespondents submits that the petition may b disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representati n before the concerned authorities and that shall be decided by the uthorities in accordance with law. P.T.O. mwmv WW§NW mwm ' é;a?%tran%¥r 11.12.2006 Smt. Hamida Siddique, learned counsel forthe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, learned P L. for the Statefrespondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner mm,m,m . Hr¥.C5) o...-o.o..o.oo @ XI—HC-78 4 ; % g Ha 200i Wmfiafai WWW Wwm WW§WW ‘ ' %?31%113=I1%¥T Having heard learned coumsel for the parties, the writ petition is dispoeed of with a direction .te th e petitioner to make a representation within a period of two weeks frc m today to the competent authority, shall be decided by the competent raising all his grievances which within a period of three months from authority in an objective manner the date of receipt of such repre ‘sentation on its merits after affording an opportunity of hearing to the p etitioner. Sd/— Dhirendra Mishl‘a 1" Judge P.T.O. Wm (W) ‘ i