HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 29th December, 2010 1st Bail Application No. 1104 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Alok Singh and another ……. Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In F.I.R. No. 587 of 2010 U/S 363, 366, 368, 376, 120-B I.P.C. Police Station Rudrapur District Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Harshpal Sekhon, the learned counsel for the applicants and Shri S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the court finds that the victim is a minor and according to her statement she was raped by two persons, even though, the medical report does not give a clear opinion that rape was committed. In view of the aforesaid statement of the victim, this court is not inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail at this stage. The bail application is rejected. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.12.2010 Shiv