IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3910 of 2010 1. RAMESH PASWAN,son of Sundeshwar Paswan 2. Mahesh Paswan,son of Sundeshwar Paswan 3. Sundeshwar Paswan,son of Late Rabi Paswan All are residents of village-Supaul, P.S.-Angarghat, Dist.-Samastipur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 12-04-2010 Heard Mr.Gajendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Ajay Kumar No. I , learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Angarghat P.S.Case No.45 of 2009 dated 03-09-2009, registered under Sections 302/201/34/120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that according to prosecution case at best petitioner no.1 can be said to be the person last seen in the company of the deceased and petitioners no.2 and 3 are alleged to have committed the crime in question, but there is no legal material to support the said allegation. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that all the three petitioners are specifically named in the FIR and the entire allegation is against all the accused persons, because of certain on going gang war between the parties. In the aforesaid background and in view of the nature of the allegation, this Court is not pursuaded to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory 2 bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected. Petitioners must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and, if so advised, seek regular bail. If such a petition is filed, the same may be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)