IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 882 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19/06/2009 in WP NO : 11919 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M/s.Sri Chaitanya Rice Mill a Partnership firm Chelluru Rayavaram(M) E.G Distrit Rep.by its Managing Partner Karri Ramesh Reddy ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The District Collector East Godavari at Kakinada- 533001 2 The District Supply Officer E.G District at Kakinada- 533001 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) This Writ Appeal is filed Writ Petitioner in W.P. No. 11919 of 2009 assailing the order dated 19.6.2009 passed by a learned Single Judge directing the appellant herein to deposit with the respondent No.1 tentative costs towards weighment, who on such receipt of amount shall initiate steps to take the actual weighment of seized stock deploying necessary personnel under the supervision of the District Manager of the A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation, East Godavari by permitting the authorized representative of the appellant and officials of enforcement and vigilance departments and such other officials, as he deems fit, to be present during weighment; that after completion of the process of weighment, the respondent No.1 shall prepare a repot and supply a copy of such report to the appellant on payment of the balance amounts towards final costs incurred for weighment and that till completion of the entire exercise referred to above, the seized stock shall not be sold. When this Writ Appeal is taken up for admission, learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of the court stating that the writ petitioner intends to withdraw the Writ Petition No. 11919 of 2009. Permission is accorded. Consequently, the Writ Petition No.11919 of 2009 is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost. ____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari __________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar July 2, 2009 MAS.