var-ii!“ HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiUlSPUR $irigle Bench : Hon’hie $§1ri Jagdish Bhélia, Ag. C.d. {it Peiition No.3271 9f 1%98 PEWTWONER : Gamsh Prasad Agrawal San of Shri Gyasiial, Aged about 46 years, R/o Bhatapara: Di$trict, Raipur (MP) RESPONDENT5 I§ 1. Madhya V Pradesh Financial Corporation, estabEis'ned under the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, having it$ head office at mdore; District indore (MP) The Deputy Genera! Manager: MP. Financiai Corporation, ig, Centrai Evenue (Wesi); Choubey Colony: Raipur; District Raipur (MP) ix) Petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of lndia §re<ehf Shri Y.C. Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P. Diwakar, Sr Advocate with Shri PK. Bhaduri. oounsei for the reepondents. ‘ ORAL ¢RDER (Passed on 13m Jame, 250?) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ihe petitioner being a guarantor hae made certain offere to the State Financial Corporation. Learned oounsei appearing for the State Financiai Corporation Shri PK. Bhaduri clearly states that the offer of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law. Counsel for the respondents euggested that it would be better if the petitioner submits a fresh offer. Let the petitioner submit his fresh offer within a period of two weeks and thereafterthe same shall be settled within a period of tour weeks. if need be, the petitioner can be called upon for consultation and conference it is further clarified that in case the petitioner makes a fresh offer, the respondents shall not alienate petitionerie unit‘ivl/s. SK. Lime Products at Bhatapara at the rate lower 'than offered by the petitioner, tin the ma! decision is taken. However: this order would not be avaiiable to the petitioner if new offer is not made within a period of two weeks With these observations, the petition stande disposed of. Sd/_ :Vi i ii i i I Acting Chief Justice r/'\,’