IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36741 of 2010(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ABDUL SAMAD RAWTHER, SHYMA MANZIL, MANGARAM MURI, PANDALAM, PLATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.PIN- 689 645. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.PIN- 689 645. 3. THASILDAR, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST.PIN- 689 645. 4. SALIM, PADINJARENALUTHUNDATHIL VEEDU, THONNALLOOR MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA.PIN- 689 501. 5. NABEESATHU BEEVI, PADINJARENALUTHUNDATHIL VEEDU, THONNALLOOR VILLAGE ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA.PIN- 689 501. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 36741 of 2010 P ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P2 appellate order passed by the second respondent, exercising his powers under the Transfer of Registry Rules, the 4th and 5th respondents filed a revision before the first respondent. Petitioner submits that on receipt of the revision, Ext.P3 notice was issued and the parties were heard by the first respondent on 16-04-2008. It is stated that so far orders have not been passed. It is complaining of the above, this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the revision was heard on 16-04-2008, the first respondent ought to have passed final orders and communicated the same to the petitioner. Having regard to his case that orders were not passed or communicated, it is directed that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the first respondent will pass orders and communicate the same to the petitioner. It is made clear that W.P.(C) No.36741/10 : 2 : it will be open to the first respondent to hear the parties afresh, if he so desires. In any case, orders shall be communicated as aforesaid, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge