IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21118 of 2010 MOHIUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence under Sections 457 and 380 of the Penal Code is of the F.I.R. being against unknown for breaking into the office when his name has transpired on alleged confession of a co-accused before the police, inadmissible in evidence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 40 of 2010. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)