1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.581 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.581 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.581 OF 2006 Central P.W.D. Mazdoor Union..Petitioner vs. The Additional Director General (Western Zone) Central Public Works Department, & Anr. .........................Respondents Mr. Jaiprakash Sawant, for the Pettioner Mr. S.S. Pakale,with Mr. Y.S. Bhate, for the respondents. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO & REBELLO & REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 DATED : MARCH 23, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The Petitioner Union had raised an Industrial dispute. The Conciliation Officer has submitted failure report by communication dated November 10, 2005. Grievance of the petitioner is that till date no reference has been made. Our attention is invited to the case of similarly situated workers where reference was made and Award was passed in favour of those workers in Writ Petition No.401 of 2004 which was decided by this Court by order dated June 16, 2004. Considering the above the Appropriate Government is directed to consider the nature of the controversy and to take 2 decision about referring the dispute within eight weeks from today. In the meantime Respondents are directed not to terminate the services of the members represented by the Petitioner Union except under the disciplinary proceedings. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)