IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3644 of 2011. Decided on: May 30, 2011. Sukh Ram & anr. Versus State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “i) That the respondent department may kindly be directed to grant the work charge status/regularization to the petitioners w.e.f. the year when they completed 10 years of daily wage service with 240 days in each calendar years with all consequential benefits like arrears, seniority and other service benefits as per the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2. According to the petitioners, their case is covered by the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 supp. (2) SCC 316. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. Thereafter, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent/competent authority in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 2 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. May 30, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol), (vs) Judge.