IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32182 of 2008 SURENDRA PRASAD @ BHUTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 4.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the attempt of the complainant wife is to get partitioned in the family and for that only she is making all the allegations of demand and torture. In the case allegation is against all the family members of similar nature. If that would come to an end then demand of partition is just and proper otherwise also the petitioner has specifically been alleged for demand and causing of cruelty. He is the husband, solely responsible for the affairs of his wife and as such he is not entitled for anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI