IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 339 of 2005 Between: S. Sudarshana Chary, S/o. Satyanarayana, Government Tribal Welfare Ashram High School, Karlapally, Govindaraopet Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Eturunagaram, Warangal District. 2. The District Tribal Welfare Officer, Assistant Project Officer, Eturuanagaram, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering case of the petitioner for regularization of his services w.e.f., the date of his Appointment as Daily Wage Worker on 03-09-1987 and not granting al the consequential benefits from that date as arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of his services w.e.f., the date of his entry into service as Daily Wage Worker i.e, on 03.09.1987 by paying all the consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.KONDAL RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER: For not considering the petitioner for regularization of his services with effect from the date of his appointment as Daily Wage Worker on 03.09.1987 and not granting all the consequential benefits from the date, the present writ petition is filed. 2 . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare. 3. Apparently, the first respondent has to take appropriate decision whether the petitioner is entitled for Daily Wages from the date of his appointment i.e. on 03.09.1987 and also whether he is entitled for any consequential benefits from that date. Further, the petitioner filed several representations dated 08.07.1999, 05.11.2002 and 13.12.2004 to the first respondent and the same are under consideration. 4 . The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 08.07.1999, 05.11.2002 and 13.12.2004 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________ (K.C. BHANU, J) Date: 09.02.2005. Ksn ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Eturunagaram, Warangal District. 2. The District Tribal Welfare Officer/ Assistant Project Officer, Eturuanagaram, Warangal District. 3. Two C. Cs to G.P. for Social Welfare, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS}