1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2526 OF 2009 Mrs. Priya Ajay Agarwal ... Applicant Vs. Mr.Ajay Ramkumar Agarwal & Ors. ... Respondents Shri M.S.Mohite, Advocate, for the applicant. Shri Nranjan Mundargi, Advocate, for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Smt. A.A.Mane, APP, for the respondent No.5- State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 30th June, 2010. P.C. 1. This Application was filed challenging the grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No. 94/2008 registered by the Bund Garden Police Station, Pune, for the offences punishable under Sections 354,498-A and 506 of IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act on 14.3.2008 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. 2. The learned Counsel for the respondents-accused makes a statement that after that, investigation has been completed, charge-sheet has been filed and the accused persons are granted regular bail by the Court. The learned Counsel for the applicant does not dispute this fact. Therefore, this Application has become infructuous for all purposes. The learned Counsel for the applicant tried 2 to point out how the order granting anticipatory bail could interfere in the proper investigation, but in my considered opinion, it will be futile exercise to go into such questions because investigation is completed and the charge-sheet is already filed. 3. Therefore, the Application stands disposed of as infructuous. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)