1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 281 OF 2009 Bhaskar Maniram Suryavanshi ... Petitioner v/s The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar for the petitioner. Mr.A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for the respondent No.1. Mr.C.R.Sonawane for the respondent No.3. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 20TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The present contempt petition has been moved contending that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court has been breached. The Division Bench by its order dated 21.1.2008 in Civil Application No.134 of 2008 in Writ Petition No. 8139 of 2006, had directed respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in this petition to fill up the existing vacancies in the posts of Head Master in its primary schools strictly in accordance with the roster prescribed under the Government 2 Resolution dated 18.10.1997 and accordingly consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as a candidate belonging to the Nomadic Tribe (C) category against Roster Point No.31. 2. An affidavit in rejoinder filed by the contempt petitioner is taken on record. 3. Admittedly, this exercise has been carried out. However, according to the petitioner, despite the Departmental Promotion Committee recommending his promotion, no order has been issued to him. In my view, this cannot amount to contempt of Court since the order dated 21.1.2008 has been complied with. The petitioner may have a grievance regarding the non-issuance of the promotion order which could be redressed in an appropriate proceeding. 4. Accordingly, notice issued stands discharged. 5. Contempt petition rejected. ..... 3