IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.20019-CII-2010 and CR No.4939 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 11.08.2010 **** Smt. Uma Devi . . . . Petitioner VS. Sunil Bansal and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Mr.B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) CM No.20019-CII-2010 Allowed as prayed for. CR No.4939 of 2010 (O&M) This revision petition is directed against order passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hisar on 28.7.2010 whereby an application filed by the plaintiff to lead evidence in rebuttal has been declined. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I find that it is apparent from the record that petitioner/plaintiff wanted to lead evidence in rebuttal on the issues which are to be proved by the plaintiff. The learned trial Court has dismissed the application on the ground that evidence which is sought to be led in rebuttal evidence should have been led in the affirmative. The issue is no more res integra that a party cannot be allowed to lead rebuttal evidence on the issue which is to be proved by the said party. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the revision petition and as such the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 11.08.2010 JUDGE Vivek