' -Vt HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No.93of2011 APPLICANT: Dewar Singh, S/o Amar Singh Mahar, aged about 60 years, R/o Village Mansula, P.S. Ambagarh Chouki, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS: ^- State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Ambagarh Chouki, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (CG) Murarilal Rangari, S/o Mansingh Rangari, aged about 28 years, R/o Arajkund, P.S. Ambagarh Chouki, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (CG) (On Bail) Present: Shri R.K. Jain, counsel for the applicant. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. Dhirendra Mishra, J. ORDER (24-2-2011) 1. By this application under Section 439(2) of the Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed for cancellation of bail order dated 9-12-2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon whereby respondent No.2 has been granted bail for offence punishable under Section 304-B of the IPC in connection with Crime No.308/09 registered in Police Station Ambagarh Chowki, Rajnandgaon. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that deceased Rukmani died by committing suicide in her matrimonial home within 7 years of her marriage. There are allegations against respondent No.2, husband of the deceased that he harassed her for dowry, however, learned Sessions Judge has granted bail only on the ground that charge sheet has been filed and possibility of delay in trial cannot be ruled out. Thus considering the gravity of the offence, the aforesaid ground was not sufficient to enlarge respondent No.2 on bail. ~ .^&''^. //"^ :\ %^^' : "'3~r.?3®!t;<';' 3. Heard. 4. From perusal of the bail order, it is clear that respondent No.2 was enlarged on bail on 9-12-2009. The instant application has been filed after 14 months from passing of the impugned bail order. There is no allegation against respondent N0.2 that he abused the conditions of the bail. Thus, considering that the instant application for cancellation has been filed after 14 months, l am of the opinion that the instant application for cancellation of bail at this belated stage of trial cannot be entertained on the grounds stated in the application. The application is accordingly rejected. p^, Dhirendra Mishra Judge Barve