IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.730 of 2006 RAM DAYALU SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 9.2.2010. Heard Mr. Bamdeo Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel to AAG-3 for the State. The petitioner who retired on 31.12.1997 from the post of Company commander from the services of the Bihar Home Guard, filed the writ petition for payment of Rs.2,17,000/-, said to have been deducted from the amount of his retiral benefits and for payment of other consequential benefits. A counter affidavit was filed on 29.11.2008, after service of the same on the learned counsel for the petitioner, enclosing the letter dated 1.2.2008 of the District Commandant, Bihar Home Guards, Muzaffarpur. It is submitted that the petitioner was earlier paid a sum of Rs.5,69,843/ towards his salary, amount of gratuity and pension amount. It is stated that after reconsideration of the claims of the petitioner, a further sum of Rs.8,48,362/- has been paid to the petitioner after deducting the Income Tax amount. It is further stated that the amount of Rs.2,17,000/- , 2 which according to the petitioner was deducted, is included in earlier payment and the same has been recieved by the petitioner. In that view of the matter, Mr. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance if he feels aggrieved by any of the calculations made by the respondents. Having regard to the circumstances set forth, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before respondent no.2 together with supportive and calculation details, if he feels aggrieved by any of the calculations and which shall be considered and disposed of by respondent no.2 in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. The writ petition stands disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)