IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11470 of 2009(C) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ CHITRA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH CENTER, SCHOOL OF NURSING M.C.ROAD, PANDALAM P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DIST., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, DR.I.JAYACHANDRAN, S/O.LATE LAKHMANA NAIKAR, AGED 58 YEARS, CHITRA MULTI-SPECIALTY HOSPITAL,ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. MR.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY, MR.AJITH MURALI. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY AFFAIRS, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. INDIAN NURSING COUNCIL, COMBINED COUNCIL, BUILDING, KOTLA ROAD, TEMPLE LANE, NEW DELHI 110 002. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.R. SREELATHA R2 BY ADV.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. R3 BY ADV.MR.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL,SC,INDIAN NURSING COUNCIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.11470/2009 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE GUIDELINES OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 09/01/09. P3: COPY OF THE CORRESPONDENCE DTD. 9/12/08. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 09/01/09. P5: COPY OF THE LETTER RECEIVED FROM THE CHRISTIAN MEDICAL MISSION, DTD. 2/12/08. P6: COPY OF THE PUSHPAGIRI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES THIRUVALLA DTD. 3/12/08. P7: COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DTD. 29/09/08. P8: COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DTD. 19/02/09. P9: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 06/04/2009. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).11470/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT Writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to issue a No Objection Certificate to the petitioner to be produced before the 3rd respondent, for the purpose of giving approval to the petitioner's Nursing College, which claims to have an intake of 20 students. Initially syndicate of the 2nd respondent rejected the petitioner's request and according to the petitioner this is because of a formal defect in the application. Be that as it may. Ext.P9 has now been preferred by the petitioner before the University seeking reconsideration of the decision. 2. I heard learned Standing Counsel for the University also in this regard. University shall consider Ext.P9, provided the same is still pending, and take a decision thereon, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Decision shall be communicated to the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs