FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/8179/2010 SOMNATH VS RAMNATH ... 1. Heard Shri Shinde, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Bedre, learned Advocate for respondents. 2. The trial Court relied upon the mutation entry and protected right of the petitioner to take water from well on Southern side as also on Western side. In the appeal preferred by respondents, the lower appellate Court noted that mutation entry supported such right only in relation to Southern side well and not Western side well. However, while narrating facts and passing final orders, there was some confusion about these directions and hence that error has been corrected on 30.4.2010. After that correction, it has become clear that petitioner/plaintiff has a right to take water only from Western side well and not from Southern side well. 3. Petitioner/plaintiff does not appear to have produced alleged partition before the trial Court and also there is no mutation entry produced before this Court. 4. In this situation, I find no case made out for interference. But as already the appellate Court has expedited hearing of the suit, the trial Court is directed to expedite hearing of RCS No.121 of 2007 and to dispose of the same at the earliest and in any case by 31.12.2011. 5. With these directions, Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dt.29.4.2011 (B.P.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) akl