IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 1347 OF 2010 ( Bhaskar Kisan Warpe VS Sow. Sangita Bhaskar Warpe and anr.) Mr. S.K. Shinde, Advocate for the petitioner. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1] Heard. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order whereby maintenance allowance is granted in favour of the respondents who are wife and son. Contention of the counsel is that in separate proceedings under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the respondents have been granted maintenance allowance. There is no legal bar in considering the grant of interim maintenance allowance in the proceedings of a suit for partition and separate possession and as such, the present Petition is devoid of substance. However, it is clarified that the maintenance allowance granted by the civil Court shall be inclusive of what the respondents have been getting in the proceedings under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With these observations, Petition disposed of. Sd/- DT. : 24.06.2010 [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp