[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.146 OF 2006 Sonabai Digambar Jagtap ..Applicant Vs. Bajirao Aba Khartode and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Nitin Pradhan i/b Anant Kandgaonkar and Ms.Shubhada Khot advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 12, 2007 DATE : JUNE 12, 2007 DATE : JUNE 12, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. This revision is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal of the respondent nos. 1 to 7 dated 23.12.2005 in Sessions Case No.924 of 2002. In the order dated 22.1.2007, this Court has observed that the learned Sessions Judge has set out cogent reasons in support of his order of acquittal. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for with the judgment and order of acquittal. However, by the said order, the notice was also issued to the State Government [-2-] only for the purpose of providing compensation to the applicant for the loss of her house/hut which was set on fire. In respect of the aid order, the learned A.P.P. states that the State Government will follow up the said matter and take a decision thereon as expeditiously as possible. 3. Revision is disposed of. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]