IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Crl. Misc. No. M- 7725 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 22.04.2010. Varun @Sheru ...... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana. ...... RESPONDENT 2. Crl. Misc. No. M- 8167 of 2010(O&M) Vishal ...... PETITIONER Versus State of Haryana. ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Yashpal Malik, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Both the aforementioned petitions have been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR Crl. Misc. No.M-7725 of 2010 No.86 dated 07.03.2010 registered under Sections 332/353/186/34 IPC, at Police Station Civil Lines, District Sonepat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 16.03.2010 in Crl.Misc. No. M-7725 of 2010 passed the following order:- “Argues that petitioner has not been named in the FIR and that no injury has also been attributed to the present petitioner and even from the very averment of the FIR only offence under Section 186 IPC is made out, which is a bailable one. Notice of motion for 22.4.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” This Court while issuing notice of motion on 18.03.2010 in Crl.Misc. No. M-8167 of 2010 passed the following order:- “Argues that present petitioner is similar to co-accused Varun @Sheru, who has already been admitted to interim bail by this Court vide order dated 16.03.2010, Annexure P1. Notice of motion for 22.4.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. To be heard alongwith Crl.M.No.M 7725 of 2010” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have already joined the investigation pursuant to the said orders dated 16.03.2010 and 18.03.2010. 2 Crl. Misc. No.M-7725 of 2010 It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed by Varun @Sheru and Vishal is accepted and orders dated 16.03.2010 and 18.03.2010 granting interim bail to them are, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petitions stand disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) April 22, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3