IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1454 of 2002 (S/B) Smt. Surja Devi. ………… Petitioner Versus State Public Service Tribunal & others. ………… Respondents Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 2 to 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. V.K. GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) This writ petition is maintainable for two reasons: firstly, because the impugned order was passed by State Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow and, therefore, this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction. Secondly, by the impugned order, the claim petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. The remedy available to the petitioner was to have filed a Recall and Restoration Application. Without availing of the remedy, the petitioner unnecessarily has filed this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed. (Dharam Veer, J.) (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 11.09.2008 11.09.2008 G