IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1429 of 2009 Md. Jakir Hussain @ Md. Zakir Hussain s/o Late Md. Younus, resident of village- Jajhat Ishalampur, P.S.- Singheshwar, Distt- Madhepura. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Shahnaz Tabassum w/o Md. Jakir Hussain @ Md. Zakir Hussain D/o Md. Ashgar Ali resident of village- Nardah, P.S. Puraini, Dist- Madhepura. … Opp. Parties. ----------- 3. 19.10.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 25.7.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhepura in Misc. (Maintenance) Case No. 27 of 2008 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1500/- per month to his wife opposite party no.2 for her interim maintenance. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, learned counsel for the State. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that it is an admitted fact that the petitioner is the husband of opposite party no. 2, Shahnaz Tabassum. She has no means to 2 support herself, whereas, the petitioner is a school teacher getting Rs.4000/- per month and has also land. The petitioner has also accepted that he has two houses and 10 Bigha ancestral agricultural land in his family. After considering the evidence adduced on behalf of both the parties, the impugned order has been passed. The maintenance case is still pending. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)