^-^, Appellants (in JaiQ Respondent HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT B1LASPUR DIVIS10N BENCH:- CORAM: Hon'bleMr.T.P.Sharma& Hon'ble Mr.R.L.Jhanwar, JJ^. Criminal Apoeal (PRl No.2519 of2<?11 s CYI P' ^^&|^() 1. Reshamlal @ Chikhliha, S/o Ramtal, aged about 48 years 2. Santosh Chandra, S/o Reshamtai Chandra. aged about 27 years. | 3. Bhagirathi, S/o Reshamlal Chandra, aged about 20 years, 4. Manbodh @ Gulabchand, S/o ' Reshamial Chandra, aged aboi^ 24 ; years, Ail R/o Nagjhar, Police Statton- * Malkharoda. Dlstrict-Janjgu'-Champia ! Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer. Police Station Maikharoda, District-Janjglr-Champa (Criminal Appeal under Sectlon 374(2) ofthe Cr.P.C.) MrAbhay Tiwari, counsel for the appeitants. Mr.D.K-Gwalre,. Govt.Advocate forthe responder^/State. ORAL ORDgR (Passedon23"'June,2011) Heard. The present appeal has been preferred against the judQment qf conviction & order of sentencedated 24.12.2010 passed by the Actelitional Sessions Judge, Saklj, Distt.Janjgir-Champa jn S.T.No.308/2009 on behalf of appeSlants Reshamial @ Chikhliha, Santosh Chandra, Bhagirathi and Manbodh @ Gulabchand. Earlier Criminal Appeal No.68/2011 has also been preferred on behalf of the aforesaid appellants against the same judgment. In the light of filing of previous appeal i.e. CrimlnaJ Appeai No.68/2011 the present appeal is redundant and unnecessary and is dismissed as ^'^ r^,.:. ^ ^ ..y redundant and unnecessary. However. counsel forthe appellants may represent the appeilants in Criminal Appeal No. 68^2011 afterfilinghis power. A copy of this order be kept in Crimlnal Appeat No. ^2011. j Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge ^