IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2005 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (St.) NO. 9344 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7830 OF 2004 Maharashtra Rajya Rashtriya Kamgar Sangh, Mumbai. Applicants. V/s ICICI Bank Ltd.& Anr... ... ..... ...... Respondent s Mr.A.T. Shetty i/by Mr.L.R.Mohite, Adv. for the applicants. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. 21.10.2005. PC: Application for adjournment rejected. The impugned order obviously is passed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Appeal against such an order passed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India under clause 15 of Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable. Mere mention of Article 226 cannot create a right in the litigant to choose the Forum or create a right to an appeal. Hence appeal is dismissed. Civil Application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. 21.10.05