IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.13206-M of 2009 Date of Decision:20.5.2011 Deep Chand .... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D.B. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Deepinder Singh, Advocate for the private respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 6.5.2006 and order dated 10.4.2009 as well as for direction to frame additional charge under Section 307 IPC against accused respondents No.2 to 4 in case FIR No.160 dated 14.12.2003 under Sections 325/323/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Bawal. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty move an application under Section 216 Cr.P.C. before the trial Court as and when additional evidence would be brought on record making out an offence under Section 307 IPC. Learned counsel for the private respondents has no Crl. M. No.13206-M of 2009 -2- objection for the said request. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an application under Section 216 Cr.P.C. at an appropriate stage and as and when the evidence making out an offence under Section 307 IPC is brought on record. The respondents shall have liberty to raise their objection, if so advised. 20.5.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE