'^^^t —*•tSi'-!f-'"S3 &-^- (VQ IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRET PETITION (S) N0. (4^ /200^^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER Narayan Ram, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Bahal Ram, Assistant School i, i3Ull UJ. Ullll J^fCUlU-1 XVCU11, a\°<""/%<^'' .•• Teacher, Govemment Primary Schc ^:'f'^^-"" Jokari, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) -V^M^ •^y' .,c*<i' >•'' ;,.'^"' y!y"v v RESPONDENTS ^y^^ ^^•^ ^ c^" VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretery, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER -w HI6H COUKT OF CHHATnSSARH AT BILASPUR W PfSl No. 123 of 2007 Petitjoner Rewondents Jagatpal Nikunj Versus Stute of ChhattiS9orh A onother W. P.(S) No. l24of 2007 Pet|toner ; Venudhar Ijardar Versus Kesfwndents '• State of Chhatt'is9arh A another W P.(S)No. 125 of 2007 Petitioner Ku. Jeevan Man^i Xalxo (after marrwge Smt. Jeevan Manju Viswas) Versus Respondents : State ofChhatfisgarh <& others W P.(S)hto. 132 cf 2007 t \ ' ' Petitioner : Ctament Kerketta Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-iS9arh <S another W.P.fS) No. 138 of 2007 Peti^ioner : t)ilip Singh Sidur 1 Versus Respondents : State of Chhattis9arh & another W. P.fSVNo 143 of 2007 Petitioner : Tritochan Ncyak Versus Respondents : State of Oihattisgou'h A another W. P.fSlNo. 144 of 20)7 Petitioner ; Knila^ipatiNayak Versus Res|^»ndents : State ofChhattisgarh A ano-ther- W P.tSYNo. 146 of 2007 Petrt^ioner : Roop Narayan Ram ' Versus Sespwndervts ' '. State of Chhatt'is9Bu'h Aanother -—^ ......^ ^ W PfSVNo. 148 of 2007 Pefitioner : Rajkumar Patel Versus Re^pondents ; State pf Chhatt-isgarh & another W. P.fSl No. ISZof 2007 Petitioner : Shyam Mohan Nayak Versus Respondents : State of Chhwttisgarh di another And W. P.fSlNo. 160 of 2007 Pe^itjoner ; Narendra Singh Nayak Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh & another S(B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Shiji A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Depu'ty Sovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer, Ate. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the req>ondents/S*ate. ORDER (Passed on this 17th Day of January. 2007) The follot^ing order oftheCourt is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed 4»unsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the ! State/re^iondents jointly submit that the f<»ctsof the present writ i! • • petitions are simitar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rakedi Kumar 5harina A ano-riier vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further submit that the question of lawinvolved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-slated submissions made by l«M'nedcounsel for the partie^i 'fhese writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 9.10.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakedi Kumou' Swrma donother vs. State of Chhatt-isgarh A others). No order ds to costs. 3. A copy of •fhjs order be ploced on record in connected matters. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Subbash