1 S.B.Cr.Misc. IInd Bail App. No.713/2008 (Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 18, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.B.S.Rathore, for the petitioner. Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as the challan papers. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejecting the first bail application, material witnesses have been examined. PW.3 Vaja is father and PW.4 Smt. Jasoda is mother of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the deceased has not even named the petitioner amongst the persons demanding the dowry, however, father of the deceased has stated that mother-in-law Smt. Laxmi, sisters- in-law Gita, Janki, maternal-uncle-in-law of deceased and one Tinu Musalman used to harass the deceased. Tinu Musalman has not been charge-sheeted. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that father of the 2 deceased has not stated anything against the petitioner, without commenting on the merit of the case, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ashok Kumar s/o Dharma Ji be released on bail in FIR No.50/2007, P.S. Abu Road City, Distt. Sirohi provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-