IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21889 of 2011(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. ARUN P.S., POOVATHUNGAL HOUSE, NEYYASSERY P.O., THODUPUZHA. 2. EMIL STEPHEN, EDAMPURATH HOUSE, KARIMKUNNAM P.O., THODUPUZHA. 3. HARIKRISHNAN .V., PADMALAYAM HOUSE, KANJIRAMATTOM, THODUPUZHA EAST P.O. 4. SIJIL U.M., UTHOLLI HOUSE, MANALI, CHITTISERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. MUHAMMED NOUFAL K.C., KUTHIREDATHU CHOLAYYIL, NOOLPUZHA P.O., CHUNDAKKARA, S. BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.J.MICHAEL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 003, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 003. R1 & R2 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.21889/2011-I: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF P.1. FOR THE SEVENTH SEMESTER B-TECH EXAMINATION DTD. 04/08/2011. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE P.2. FOR THE EIGHTH SEMESTER B-TECH EXAMINATION DTD. 28/07/2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE P.2. FOR THE SEVENTH SEMESTER B-TECH EXAMINATION DTD. 28/07/2011. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE P.3. FOR THE SEVENTH SEMESTER B-TECH EXAMINATION DTD. 28/07/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE P.4. FOR THE EIGHTH SEMESTER B-TECH EXAMINATION DTD 28/07/2011. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE P.5. FOR THE EIGHTH SEMESTER B-TECH EXAMINATION DTD. 28/07/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21889 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the results were declared, petitioners failed in different papers of different semesters. They applied for revaluation as per Exts.P1 to P6 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp