IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8968 of 2006 BUTAN CHAUDHARY Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 5 15.9.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner had earlier approached this Court in CWJC No. 15769 of 2005 against a set of punishment order which came to be passed against him. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondents which was duly served on the petitioner on 17.8.2006 as would be evident from the endorsement made in this regard. The respondents have categorically stated that the orders in appeal and revision have already been passed much earlier. But this fact was not brought to the notice of the Court and a categorical statement was made on behalf of the petitioner that he wants indulgence to withdraw the present writ application with liberty to take recourse to statutory appeal and revision. The writ application was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid vide order dated 20.2.2007. Petitioner has come back before this Court now with yet another writ application which is CWJC No.8968 of 2006, the present writ. In the present writ application the petitioner is seeking similar relief and is now seeking quashing of the orders passed in appeal and revision. Since the petitioner chose not to amend his prayer in the initial writ application despite the orders having been attached in the counter affidavit, the Court has difficulty in - 2 - entertaining the present writ application in the given background. The repeated writ application for the same and similar cause of action cannot be entertained. Petitioner may have a recourse by review of earlier order if law so permits. This writ application is dismissed accordingly. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)