IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 337 OF 2005 SHREE RAWALNATH DEVASTHAN,REP.BY ....Applicant THE PRESIDENT OF ITS MANAGING COMMITTEE, SANVORDEM GOA. Versus SHRI BHAURAO VITHAL ....Respondent GHAISASS(SIN.DEC.) REP.BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS., Shri S.D.Lotlikar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya S. Naik, Advocate for the applicant. Shri G.Kudchodkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 16th January, 2006 P.C. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not satisfied that the blanket stay for execution of the impugned order should be granted in the manner asked for. However, in case the respondents desire to withdraw the amount stated to have been deposited in the District Court, the respondents shall furnish an appropriate security to the satisfaction of the District Court Judge for the purpose of withdrawal of the said amount. The application accordingly stands disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. PS