9.4.2009 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A. G. and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy.A.G. for the respondents CWP(T) No.4235/2008 (OA No.505/97) In the present case, the petitioner was appointed as Store Attendant. Vide Notification dated 5.5.1995 (Annexure A-3), the respondents have framed the Recruitment and Promotion Rules in respect of the work charged/work charged brought on regular cadre in the department of HPPWD. In all, 47 categories have been clubbed together. Creation of cadre is solely the prerogative of the State. {Shiba Kumar Dutta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (1997) 3 SCC 545 & Commissioner Corporation of Madras v. Madras Corporation Teachers Mandram & Ors. (1997) 1 SCC 253}. There is nothing capricious or arbitrary about the same and, as such, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the respondents again and the respondents shall decide her earlier representation dated 16.8.1996 (Annexure A-6) along with her subsequent representation if made, within a period of three months from today. The petition is disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. April 9, 2009 (rana)