l-M #38 % 20.05.2011 Present: Petitioners in person witin Mr.Arun Rathee, Advocate, who identifies them. jvir. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State/respondent No.l with SI Anil Tushir, P.S. Bawana, who identifies the complainant/Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate. +Crl.M.A.No.6000/2011(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CrI.M.C. 1636/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.352/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Bawana on the complaint of the respondent No.2. Ground for seeking quashing is that the parties have amicably settled the dispute with the intervention of friends and well-wishers and now there is no dispute left between them. It is submitted that the parties have amicably settled the matter and as per the terms of settlement, petitioners have agreed to pay a sum of ? 6 lakhs to respondent No. 2 in full and final settlement of her claim for 'streedhan', maintenance-past, present and future etc., which amount has already been paid to the respondent No.2 and now, there is no dispute left between the parties. It is further submitted that the parties have obtained the consent divorce. ys Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Respondent No. 2 confirms that she has entered into the settlennent with the petitioners of her own accord without any inducement or threat and pursuant to the settlement, she has already received ? 6 lakhs in cash from the petitioners. Respondent No. 2 further submits that now, there is no dispute left between her and the petitioners and therefore, she does not want the petitioners to be prosecuted on her FIR and she has no objection if ^ the FIR is quashed. Petitioners as well as the respondent No. 2 have signed the copy of the settlement deed in token of their confirming the authenticity of the copy. Learned APP appearing for the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived between the parties, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in prosecuting the petitioners on the basis of FIR. Accordingly, FIR No. 352/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Bawana and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Petition stands disposed of. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE MAY 20, 2011 akb