IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40420 of 2009 RAVI RANJAN KUMAR SOREN Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 16.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the parties is that F.I.R. was not sent by C.J.M., Bhagalpur to the Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna due to which petitioner got no relief. So, the Anticipatory Bail, filed in the Court of Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur, is dismissed on the ground of its being not maintainable. So, it appears lack of vigilance. The C.J.M., Bhagalpur should be cautious enough to send the F.I.R. to the Special Court, Vigilance, Patna and petitioner is advised to seek relief from the Special Court, Vigilance, Patna. C.J.M., Bhagalpur is directed to send the same immediately in case he has not sent the F.I.R. till today. In the meantime, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No. 75 of 2007 pending in the Court of C.J.M., Bhagalpur. The stay order shall stand vacated after a month the F.I.R. is sent to the Special Court, Vigilance, Patna in which period bail or anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner shall also be decided. With the above observation, the application is disposed of. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)