IN THE HGH I GGUE T OF CHHATTISGH AR &T BILASPUR T ETT 22 hot3har Chouclha <ir ry Son o- Shri Moh hdhar f it Cauy Aged about 36 yearVce—rsident Saraipa i, ednt o illgeLmg Tahsil araipali, aad ETIOER §TIN s,i9e ] Rsie f Va~iaon b DistMahsmm ' Ver M State of htisa Through The ea Panchay & ram ikas DK. Bhawan aip The Cll at, M ahasemund w§w r ig d 4) The Chief Executie Officer Janapaa‘ Pancha—Saraia Qtrictmahasamund RPOND ES ENTS w€ 3) The Deputy Gollecto-cumaae‘w Pxesdin Officer Mahasamun WRI pETO UER ARTICLES 22 & 227 FHE uONsTITUTION OF DIA WI pIION No. “M97 /00 sus / u / Chatgrh Scretry at Gin V . , Rur o cor v yatpli is. T xTIN ND 6 Og :N petitioner. Shri RS. JaiSwal, Shri Deep Kesharw the State/respondents on advz Heard. Couneel for the pe‘ iitioner submits that the petitioner has received a notim g of no confidence motion. AS per the notice the meeting submission of the counsel fo Nilamber who happens to be t} pe husband of Ganga Moti has lodged a report against the So far a3 the allegat- Shri Kesharwani learned the petitioner is concerned, counsel appearing for the Stat e submits that the person who lodged the report has 3 iot been made as party [@W learned counsel for the ani, learned counsel for nce copy. for no confidence motion ~is scheduled to take place on 24.‘1.2002. It is further ? the petitioner that one mmwm ‘K4 present petitioner. on regarding detention of o“wh m. hwkWwwvw” . m mam fan-em momma mm WWIT-sem omelet 22(61i29Q2 :- XI-HC-22 wm 31mm! Wmm mm wm %armm mm respondent. It is further hiS submission that the proper remedy under the Constitut' n of India and also the Code of Criminal Procedure i available to the person. According to the learned co 11sel for the petitioner, a representation has been ma e before the Competent Authority i.e. Collector vid annexure 13—6 by one Prafulla Kumar Bhoi, Mem er, Janpad Panchayat, Saraipaii. Shri Kesharwani points out that the Superintendent of Police an the concerned Station House Officer have not b en impleaded as party respondents and as such e could not seek the instructions in that regard. H however submits that if the proper reports are lod d with the authorities, action shall be taken in accor ance with law. Having thus con idered the facts and \circurnstances of the case d material available on \ \ [we no? \ record this Court is of theo}: inion that it would be in the interest of justice: to direct the respondents that if "the petitionerima‘kes any representation nor lodges a 7 report before the Collector/competent authority, the , same shall be considered by the competent authority and appropriate action shall be taken in accordance ”withilavy‘y. Thus the representation if any is made, it is directed that the Competent authority shall consider 'i the salne and take necessary action in aCcordan‘ce With-k; law. , 'V ‘/ ;: ,The authorities shall see that the over all law and order is properly maintained by the parties. With the observatians and directions made above, thepetition stands disposed 70f at this stage Certiiieyd copy as p6 r rules. /\ l > 1 Sdl— l Acting Chief Justice [in 1Q? rmmm %awmawhr