Crl. Misc. No.M-25613 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-25613 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 16, 2010 Devender @ Tinku …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Balwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is one of the three boys who accompanied Deepu armed with lathi, danda and pebble while committing the murder of Dinesh, as per the statement of complainant Naresh. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR despite the fact that the petitioner belongs to the same Crl. Misc. No.M-25613 of 2010 [2] village as that of complainant. It is also claimed that the petitioner has been involved in the case on the basis of the statement of accomplice i.e. Deepu. I have heard counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner may have a good case on merits but it will not be appropriate at this stage to enter into the niceties of the trial to determine the admissibility or relevance of the evidence which is sought to be produced by the prosecution agency. Dismissed at this stage. November 16, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE