1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY & ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 871 OF 2009 Kajanna Nagappa Kunchikurve. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Lugardhan Shetty. ... Defendant. Mr. B.N. Shah i/b. Pramesh Vakil for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. :- The Plaintiff has stated that he is a money lender. He has a licence issued in his favour for the money lending business under the Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1958 and the Rules framed thereunder which is renewed from time to time. It is on the basis of the same that he disbursed the loans and which have not been repaid although a Promissory Note was executed in favour of the Plaintiff. The Promissory Note was dishonoured and thereafter, a demand notice has been issued. There is no reply thereto. The parties are residing at Bombay. Further, the Suit claim arises out of Promissory Note dated 5th May 2008. Hence, it is not barred by limitation. In these circumstances, the Suit is decreed as prayed. The original documents are taken on record and marked ‘P’ collectively. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Advocate’s costs to be computed as per rules. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)