IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2010 / 1ST MAGHA 1931 RP.No. 67 of 2010 ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2359/2009 Dated 28/10/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS IN W.A./RESPONDENTS IN W.P. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, (DIC), ALLEPPEY, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN W.P./RESPONDENT IN W.A. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/S.MAGNUM GLASS WORKS, PLOT NO.28, CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AROOR P.O., ALLEPPEY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER. BY ADV.SRI.R.MURALEEDHARAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 21/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K.Basheer, J. ------------------------------------------ C.M.Appln. No.5 of 2010 & R.P. No.67 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of January, 2010 ORDER S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. Heard learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the review petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent. Delay of 47 days in filing the review petition is condoned. 2. Having heard learned counsel on both sides and having perused the grounds raised in the review petition, in our view, the grounds raised do not fall within the limited jurisdiction envisaged under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure as no new facts discovered in spite of the due care taken by the petitioners/appellants were brought to the notice of the Court or there is any error apparent on the face of the records or there is any typographical mistake. The grounds now raised in the review petition are almost new grounds on merits. Review on W.A. No.67 of 2010 2 that ground is impermissible. Hence we find no merit in the review petition and the same is dismissed. S.R.Bannurmath, Chief Justice A.K.Basheer, Judge vns