IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital : the 8th day of August, 2008 First Bail Application No. 266 of 2008 Criminal Side Sushil Kumar S/o Om Prakash Mundapi ………. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……… Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 241/ 2007 Under Sections: 498-A, 304-B, 201 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act P.S.: Kotwali Roorkee, District: Haridwar. __________________________________________________________ Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. Mr. Rajendra Kotiyal, learned counsel for the applicant / petitioner and Mr. Nandan Arya, learned Asst. Government Advocate appearing for the respondent State. 2. Despite clear direction contained in the order dated 8th July, 2008 that the actual date of marriage shall be intimated to the Court, the affidavit filed by Shri Navneet Singh, Sr. Circle Officer, Roorkee is conspicuously silent about this aspect of the matter. I am left with no option to accept the bail application of the petitioner. 3. The petition accordingly is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bail bond with two sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 08.08.2008 Avneet