C‘W IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA’I‘URE AT BILASPUE“ CE-EHATTISGARH) WRET PETXTION NO. 9,}2bOF 2003 “a PETITIONER : Thakeshwar sahu, son of shri Brij La]. sahu, aged about 28 vears, resiéent of Village— Tala Kurra, Tehs11 and Dlstra.ct— r Kanl/er (C Go) (Branch Post Master) at Post Office-Tala I urra. m; Union of India, through, Post Master General, ‘E’ He ad Office z De lhi. The Postmaster General, Chhattisgarh Parimandal,Raipur. Post superinte ndent, B astar Division ,J agdalpur , ( c. G. P0st Assistant InSpector, Kanker, District—Kanker,(C.G°) i " } 6A9 “Va/u Vh aw} lor‘M‘ M0} WRIT PETITION UNDER AR’T‘ICLES 22L227 OF THE UM comsTnUg‘lom OE mom. ; 5f9/2003 Heard Shri Yogesh Pandey for the petitioner. Shn' AS‘ Gaharwar, C nior Standing Caunsel for Union of India, appears for the respondents‘ The petitioner’s gieva ce is that he was wogdng as Panchayat Sanchaf Sewn Agant from 3/1/1997 and one branch post-oEwe at Tala Kun‘a waa opened on 9/3/2 Respondent no.3 asked the petitioner to work there in the capacity of Post Master and stated that the appointment letter will be issued vetv sh .x,¢’ On that, the petitioner continued to work for three months and thereafte ail of a sudden respondent no.4 came and asked the petitioner to stop w rking as Post Master. Moreover, it is atso clear from the record that res ondent no.3 invited the apphoations for the post of Post Master vide Anen ure-P/2 and the petitioner had applied for the said post. hut so far no decisi n has been taken on that. Therefore. the petitioner has sought relief thtrespondent no.3 be directed to issue an appointment order in favour o the petitioner on the post of Post Master at Sub Post Office, Tala Kurra. Learned counsel for the ‘espondents at the very out—set submitted that this matter pertains to central s rvioes and for that there is a sepate it ra w 0 o XI—HC-22 WWW wmR $31fi—vmaa1ém ie. Central Administrative Tli‘e move the Centtal Administrative Since this matter permit .any gn'evance can be sought petitioner should move before tht With the aforesaid obsen In View of the aboveyi (iisposed of. )unal, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to Ttibunal. is to central services for which the redressal of Jefote the Central Admittisha/tive Tribunal, the t said forum. ations, this writ petition stands disposed. «LWP, No.2490/03 and 1A. No.8235/03 stand A Sd/~ LCBHADOC:‘ [new . “