1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.221 OF 2007 Kazi Syed Salahuddin S/o.Kazi Syed Nazirul Hasan, PETITIONER VERSUS Syed Shahabuddin S/o.Syed Bahauddin Shuttari, died through L.Rs. And others RESPONDENTS None appeared for petitioner when called out. Mr.A.P.Bhandari, who has filed caveat is present before the Court. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 02/07/2009 PER COURT : 1. Faradsheet show that after the CRA is lodged, registered and numbered, it was on the board dated 22/06/2009. At that time also, advocate for revision applicant was absent. Hence the Civil Revision Application was adjourned today. Today also when called out, advocate for revision applicant is absent. As there is caveat filed by Adv.Bhandari, he is called upon. He made a statement across the bar that the present civil revision application is filed against the interim order passed in RCS No.16/2002 pending on the file of Maharashtra Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad and the main proceeding 2 in RCS No. 16/2002 was already disposed of. Against the said order in the main proceeding, i.e. in RCS No.16/2002 was also challenged by the civil revision application and also by the Wakf Board. The civil revision application filed by the applicant against the said order is also withdrawn, but civil revision application filed by the Wakf Board is still pending. In view of this, the fact remains that the present civil revision application is preferred against the interim order in RCS No. 16/2002 which itself was disposed of, then this civil revision application will become infructuous. Apart from it, even though the matter twice appeared on the board, the applicant is not appearing before the Court, which indicates that the applicant in the present civil revision application has lost his interest. Hence this Civil Revision Application deserve to be dismissed in default and accordingly civil revision application stands dismissed for default. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/cra221-07