:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.94 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.94 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.94 OF 2008 Agnel Dumig Disouza ...Petitioner. v. Smt. Ujwala Vasantrao Patil ...Respondents. Mr. Amit Borkar , adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.P.P.Chavan , adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 7th March, 2008. DATE: 7th March, 2008. DATE: 7th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Twenty-five students including the present petitioner had filed writ petition no.844 of 2008 challenging the order passed by the Ad-hoc District Judge, Kolhapur in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.12 of 2008. The District Court had given concession to the concerned 25 students to fill in forms for the S.S.C. Examination to be held in March, 2008 as private students till 11th February, 2008 with the super late charges as applicable to their case in order to save their career. The learned Single Judge of this Court while dismissing the Writ Petition No.844 of 2008 by order dated 7th February, 2008 observed that in the peculiar facts of the case, S.S.C. Board may consider granting concession in charges without same being :2: treated as precedent for anyother case. The present applicant thereafter submitted his form for appearance in the said examination as regular student and not as private student. Because he was not regular student, his application came to be rejected by the S.S.C. Board and, therefore, he has filed the present contempt petition against the respondent, who is Divisional Secretary, Kolhapur Divisional Circle of the S.S.C. Board. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent points out that the present petitioner was expected to submit a form as private student and not as regular student and, therefore, no mistake was committed by the S.S.C.Board and, therefore, according to him, no contempt has been committed by the S.S.C. Board. Having taken instructions from the respondent, the learned counsel for the respondent makes a statement that the respondent does not have power to accept the forms at this late stage unless there is an order from the Court. 3. In view of the above circumstances, I do not find any substance in the contempt petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. However, if the petitioner submits appropriate examination form as private student before the respondent with appropriate late fees till 3.00 p.m. on 8th March, 2008, same shall be accepted by the S.S.C.Board and the petitioner shall be allowed to :3: appear for the examination. 4. Petition stands disposed off accordingly. If the application is so submitted, the respondent may make appropriate arrangement for his appearance in the examination. 5. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)