IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16775 of 2010 1. RAM NARESH SINGH @ DHANANJAY KUMAR @ Ram Naresh Sharma 2. Veena Devi and 3. Runti Devi Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Informant’s daughter died due to burn injury is an admitted fact. Allegation is about setting her on fire by in-laws family members including petitioners who are bhainsur, gotani and mother-in-law. Dying declaration is said made by the deceased before her mother. F.I.R. is lodged only after death of the deceased. While she remained for 2/3 days in the hospital, deceased was able to make statement is statement of the doctor. That is replied by the petitioners that killing after 17 years of the marriage for dowry and blame of giving birth of a female child, is five years ago, information to the informant’s family members, there reaching also and if really the deceased made any statement that was not informed to the police for recording of dying declaration in presence of the doctor, if not by a magistrate, by the I.O.. In any case incident of fire is not satisfactorily explained while that occurred in matrimonial house but petitioner no.2 is Gotani having status of the deceased in the family. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, abovenamed petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Nawadah, in Warsaliganj P.S. Case No.13 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far above named petitioners no.1 and 3 are concerned, their prayer for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. AnilKr.Sinha ( Mandhata Singh, J. )