- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.49 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.2046 OF 2005 ... Ranapratap Sohanlal Verma ...Plaintiff v/s. M/s.Laminar Industries & Ors. ...Defendants ... Mr.G.H.Shukla i/b G.H. Shukla & Co. for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. - 2 - DATED: 12TH JUNE, 2006 P.C.: This summons for judgment is directed against the Defendants Nos. 1, 4 & 5. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff states that the Plaintiff abandons his claim against Defendants Nos. 2 & 3. Defendant No.1 is a partnership firm of which the Defendants Nos. 2 to 5 are partners. Defendants Nos. 1, 4 & 5 have been served. Affidavit of service has been filed. They have chosen not to file any application for leave to defend the suit. In terms of provisions of Order XXXVII of CPC, in the absence of any application for leave to defend filed by the Defendants, Plaintiff becomes entitled to judgment. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff. Perused the record. Summons for judgment granted. Suit decreed in terms of prayer clause (a) as against Defendants Nos. 1, 4 & 5. Suit against Defendants Nos. 2 & 3 is dismissed. Refund of court fees as per rules. ...