IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.65650-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 26, 2006 Smt.Shakuntla Jindal and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS Vineet Sethi and another ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. J.K.Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners. ... The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the complaint (Annexure P-1) and the summoning order (Annexure P-2). After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioners states that he does not want to press this petition with liberty to raise all the points raised in this petition at the appropriate stage of the trial. He prays that personal appearance of the petitioners being ladies be exempted before the trial Court. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points raised in this petition at the appropriate stage of the trial. In case the petitioners file an application for personal exemption before the trial Court, the same shall be considered keeping in view the fact that the petitioners are ladies and the law laid down by the Supreme Court in M/s.Bhaskar Industries Limited v. M/s. Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd., 2001(4) RCR (Crl.) 137. October 26, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE