IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 937 of 2009 Ranjan Kandari. …..…Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …….Respondents. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. Vinod Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner was arrested and now he is in judicial custody. His further argument is that complainant is not legally wedded wife and complainant is wife of Narendra Chaudhary. He further stated that during the investigation every document shall be produced before Investigating Officer to prove that complainant / informant is not wife of the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned AGA agreed to this point and submitted that in case any material is produced before the Investigating Officer, the same shall be taken into consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this court to withdraw the writ petition in the light of statement made by learned AGA. Permission granted. 2 Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Stay application no. 9330 of 2009 stands disposed of. (Alok Singh, J.) 24.11.2009 SKS