FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5874 OF 200 PETITION NO. 5874 OF 200 PETITION NO. 5874 OF 2002 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.K.Mendadkar for the petitioner. Shri C.R.Sonawane AGP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 25TH APRIL,2006 25TH APRIL,2006 25TH APRIL,2006. P.C. 1. By consent of parties, the matter is taken up for hearing immediately today. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the committee erred in holding the petitioner as Scheduled Tribe belonging to Halba-Koshti category. Factually this is done by the committee after considering the entire evidence on record. The Learned AGP opposed the petition contending that the findings are properly recorded. 2. The para 3 of the order at page 30 clearly states that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribe. Whatever happens to the judgment in W.P. 2944/84 the finding that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribe cannot be touched. Hence petition is disposed of. ...