IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44785 of 2010 MD. GHAYSUDDIN @ GAYASUDDIN SON OF SK. ALI HASAN, R/O VILLAGE- HIRDAIPUR ITAHARA, P.S.- ARARIA, DISTRICT- ARARIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13/04/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice. However, liberty was granted to him that he may renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two wives of the deceased have been examined and one of the wives stated that the petitioner was not the offender. It has also been submitted that despite several orders of this court the trial has not been concluded as yet and the informant is also yet to be examined. The petitioner is in custody since 1.8.2008. After considering the allegation, earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected and liberty was granted to him to renew prayer for bail after examination of the informant. It appears that the trial court is taking steps and the witnesses are being examined. Considering the above facts, presently I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, he is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of the informant. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin