¥V K2^^ da 4--"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3£'/^ OF 2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS -•-^' x^ .€0^^v .<".' Iv s.^ V -^ G- •^.^ '^" ^ Vishwanath Pandey Son of Late Shri Kawal Pandey, aged about 62 years, Retired Forester, Resident of Purandih, Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. "' State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. *' The Divisional Forest Officer, East Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 3. The Senior Account Offiicer, office of the Accountant General, Raipur (C.G.). ov>p WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION_ OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT_IN_mE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION ETC. ;A XI-HC-78 *11*IMI Sh*1|th 3^ •<ii<iici<i, aiTflu'is, RfcflU^ A^..^^.^C?^A. W?[ 200 311^1 '<ach ('i<:l(^'sl<<,ET) sn^Twf^rR; tW 317^1 Stifil) Roshan/- ^' ^ ??aTWHfB(]'3n^r 21.7.2006 fi|>r U)e Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate Miss &eepali Pandey, P.L. Meard. The main grievonce raised b^| the retirement of The petitioner, respondent No.2 inspite of the Learned counsel for the pe'l the petitioner may be aiiowed to m41 No.2 and in turn respondent No.2 accordance with lauu, to which ie<|r objection. Havinq heard learned couns^l facts and circumstonces of the merits of the case, the petitioner i) raising ali his grievances aiong wit^i within ten doys from today and in the representation ot petitioner receipt of representation after petitioner in accordance with law. With the direction aforesddl, J CerTlffed copy as per puies. «hi'iif<']<(1-< Hi*iiiTffteA<Ri«;i< ^isri^iTsn^T cdee. the petitioner. for |the State on crivance copy. the petitioner in this petition is That after l(ie 6PF amount is not being paid to him by auth{irity ietter issued by respondent No.3. rttioner submits that in the circumstances >4ke o detailed representation to respondent directed to decide his representation in ie<|rned Panel Lawyer for the State has no tor the parties and having regard to the ;, without expressing any opinion on the allowed to make a detaiied representation copy of this petition to respondent No.2 I'urn respondent No.2 is directed to decide wjthin a period of 30 days from the date of c^nsidering all the grievances roised by the the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge ',1 P.T.O. I*