1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8255 OF 2009 Rashid Usman Sutar .. Petitioner Vs Proposed Low Income Group Gruhnirman Sahakari Society and ors .. Respondents Mr V.B.Rajure, for the petitioner. Mr Dilip Bodake, for respondent no.1 Ms. Neha Bhide, AGP, for respondent nos 2 to 4. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 11/12/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents waive service. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 6.8.2009 passed by the Minister (Co-operation). By order dated 6.8.2009, the Minister has set aside the orders dated 28.1.2004 and 8.9.2006 passed by the Deputy Registrar and the Divisional Joint Registrar, respectively. Both these orders were in favour of the petitioner. The order of the Minister is challenged mainly on the ground that the T 2 Minister allowed the Revision filed by respondent no.1 and set aside the aforementioned orders in favour of the petitioner even without issuing notice to the petitioner. The petitioner was respondent no.1 in the revision. Neither the learned AGP nor the learned counsel for respondent no.1 disputed the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to that effect. In view thereof, the order dated 6.8.2009 deserves to be set aside. Order accordingly. Revision Application filed by respondent no.1 is restored to file. Respondent no.4 shall decide the Revision Application afresh on merits in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. All contentions of the parties are kept open. It is open to the parties to move the concerned Minister/Secretary for disposal of the Revision within the time stipulated. Rule is made absolute in terms of this order. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 3