IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18893 of 2010 WAJIB HUSSAIN @ WASID HUSSAIN Versus SATTE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 17.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Petitioner being father-in-law is languishing in custody in a case registered under Section 304B/34 of the I.P.C. and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is alleged that all the in-laws family were demanding Rs. 50,000/- as dowry and for non- fulfilment of the same the informant’s daughter has been burnt to death. From the F.I.R. it appears that the informant came to know about the burnt injuries on 13.02.2009, the victim died on 20.02.2009 whereas the F.I.R. was lodged on 28.02.2010 even after one week of the death. Considering the delay in lodging the F.I.R. and the general nature of allegation, let the petitioner namely Wajib Hussain @ Wasid Hussain, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned F.T.C.-I, Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 66 of 2009, Sessions 2 Trial No. 70 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)