IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2005 SHRI RAMESH S.VOLVOIKAR,TIVIM-GOA. ....Appellant Versus SMT. SUKANTI S.SHIRODKAR AND ANR., ....Respondents Shri A. R. Kantak, Advocate for the appellant. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 22nd September, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. A. R. Kantak, the learned Counsel for the appellant. I perused the Judgment of the appeal Court as well as that of the trial Court. Both the Courts below have considered the documentary as well as oral evidence and reached the finding that the complaint lodged by the respondents cannot be said to be in bad faith. The findings are based on appreciation of evidence. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The second appeal is dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J. ssm.