p7 Wj{1 ttt COT T RT OF 44A A ‘GOE T33 i6T OjrTE 1998 ,T JSTT AA3AAIM! i:xJ o23 2 4223 2 5L]3 TN W 2V4h1997 S andras’ekar Shivalingappa 8i1undi, aged about 78 yøars, 0cc, Bustness R/at Bilpundi. Gaens, Sedarn mad, Gulbarga— S P’ “ P ‘F’ 23P5’197 ———- Sri,h1,iasank r, S o, 9 Chandrashekar, Bhival!npapoa i1g.indi, aged about 45 vpars, Occ Business, R at Bligundi Gar1ns, Selarn Road, Gu1barEL (Sr1,G,S,V1swes’4nra or Petitione’s) MID:. 1, State of yarnataka, rep, by its Secretary and Commissioner, HousIng & ‘Irban Dave! opnent Department, viahana Soudha, BangaloreSBO 001. 2, Guibarga Urban Developnent Authority, rep, by its Commnissioner, Office of the Gulbarga Urban Developnent Authority, Gulbsrg&. 3, The Chainnan, Gulbarga Urban #eveloprment Authority, Gul.barga City, : RESPOiID87flS (Sri.’,’Tagaraa, HCGP, for LI SrI,Basava Prabbu Patti for L2 S 3) •** * These WMt Fetition.s filed under Articles 226 & 22? of the Constitution of IndIa with an affidavit praying to declare sect 4 on 32 (53 of the Karriataka Urban Developeent Authorittes Act, 1387 as void and invalid In so far as it nlates to taking away the ownership of the parks, open space, cIvic amenities area without conpensation and etc,, , , , , 3 e3e These Writ Petitions coning on for prelisinars hearin in !, group this dsy, the Court isle thai folio’.ing: ORD!R Sri Basavapnbhu Patti tahs notice for WSe pondents 2 an4 3. The jetitoner in this writ petItion has cbs iieng.d the validity of Section 32 (5) of the ‘are nataka Urban Developsent A’atority Act, 198?. This Court in ‘1.9.21413/94 u$ieid the validity of Se3tion 3P (‘3 of tie “rban Developsent *athority Act. loilo Anp the SSii decision ad for the reasons stat—I ther?in thase writ petttons are iaiai to be d1sidsqe4 Accorilntv, thesa w1t netitions are reflactai’3. 31 —Judge. ?•OgTT %by: 4 C • by Assistant ‘flstn— ugh Court of TB rnataka Banga1ore55o 001. 4