1 ABA-1020.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1020 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Girish Chandrakant Gogad .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri N.R. Bubna for the Applicant. Smt. S.V. Sonawane, APP, for the State. S/Shri Satyajeet P. Dighe i/b Makrand Panchakshari for the First Informant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person who is alleged to have taken a loan of `20,00,000/- from a Co- operative Bank on the security of mortgage of a property which the first informant has purchased in a Court auction. The applicant's aunt has executed the mortgage to secure the loan. The learned counsel for the applicant states that, without prejudice to his rights and claim, the applicant would secure the loan by executing another mortgage in respect of another property and see that the property in 2 ABA-1020.11 question is released within a period of four weeks. 2. In view of the above, though the learned counsel for the first informant as well as the learned APP have another view of the matter, there is no reason to subject the applicant to custodial interrogation. The application is allowed. In the event of the applicant s arrest in C.R. No.184 of 2011 of Manmad City Police Station, Manmad, the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to `25,000/- on the condition that the applicant shall ensure that the property, namely, Survey No.1144/B having an area of 93.4 sq.mtrs. at Manmad is released by the Bank and the mortgage deed is cancelled. If the needful is not done within four weeks, this order shall stand revoked without further reference to the Court. 3. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and he shall not leave the 3 ABA-1020.11 country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 4. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in AIR 2011 SC 312. 5. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)