IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS MANOJ KUMAR PATEL, AGED 2 L ABOUTMYEARS, SON OF SHRI RAMAYAN PRASAD PATEL, RESIDENT OF GRAM GHUTIA, TAH. NAWAGARH, DISTT. JANJGIR— CHAMPA (CHHATTISGARH) g3” VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH : ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JANPAD PANCHAYAT, NAVAGARH, DISTT. JANJGIR-CHAMPA (C.G.) THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, JANJGIR—CHAMPA (C.G.) DISTRICT THE COLLECTOR, JANJGIR—CHAMPA (C.G.) THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JA R (CHHATTISGARH). THE SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHAYAT GHUTIA, DISTT. , I JANJGIR—CHAMPA (C.G.) THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT GHUTIA, DISTT. JANJGIR-CHAMPA (C.G.) SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV, SON OF SHRI BISHRAM YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GHUTIA, TAH. NAVAGARH, DISTT. JANJGIR- CHAMPA (CHHATTISGARH). WRIT PETITION No. 378$ 12003/ 8. / PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF WRITS. NATURE. / XE-HC—Ji 8 3aWj WW W 12-{ Shri Sanjay K. Agmwcl, coun‘sel for 'rhe pe‘i‘i‘rioner. 5hri Sandeep Dubey, Pane! Lawyer for Th? é‘ta‘l'a/responden‘rs 1T0 5. . ! Hear-d on LANQ. 4705/ 004 which i§_an apphcm‘iorz for l wimdmwal of i'he pefifion. y,» gig“ This appliccvrion is no? oppos d by fhe STa’re cwnsgi. This inferim applica’rion for iihdmwai is allowed. The pefifion is dismissed as ifhdmwn. 7/1/ sd)- . “a W 20©3 W‘m (Wt?) Wmwm H211 WEWW bmma a:r&‘&7 WhW WrW é; 3%?! am 24.2.2005