1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10046 OF 2009 Smt. Anita Raosaheb Nagargoje ....Petitioner. Vs. The Secretary, Shikshan Sewak District Selection & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. Sachin Dhakephalkar for the Petitioner. Mr. C.G. Gavnekar for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. A.P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE : 5th April, 2010 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 makes statement that the Petitioner has alternative remedy and/or to challenge the grievances so raised, before the Grievance Committee constituted under Shikshan Sevaks Scheme, at Mumbai. The Petitioner is not disputing the same. 2 In view of this, keeping all points open, as the alternative remedy is available, the Petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that the Grievance Committee, so constituted under the Scheme, to take decision preferably, within two months. 3 The Petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)