:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. COMPANY PETITION NO.589 OF 2001 COMPANY PETITION NO.589 OF 2001 COMPANY PETITION NO.589 OF 2001 Tarulata Anil Amin and Anr. .... Plaintiffs versus Master Clock and Watch Works P.ltd .... Defendants. *********** COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2001 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2001 COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2001 IN IN IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 589 OF 2001 COMPANY PETITION NO. 589 OF 2001 COMPANY PETITION NO. 589 OF 2001 Parvatiben Patel and Ors .. Plaintiffs versus Master Clock & Watch Works P.Ltd .. Defendants. Shri Vivek Shiralkar for the petitioner. Mr. F.E. Devitre with Mr. P.N. Modi i/b. Federal and Rashmikant for respondent no.2, 5 and 11. Mr. Karthik Desai for respondent no.1. Mr. M.C. Shah for the respondent no.9. Shri J.S. Solomon for respondent no.10. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Both the parties to the petition have filed :2: :2: :2: consent minutes of order dated 4.3.2005 for amending the petition in terms of the draft amendment. All the parties have no objection. In view thereof the amendment granted in terms of the draft amendment. Parties have tendered consent terms duly signed by them and their advocates. Consent terms taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Respondent nos.1, 2,5 and 11 have joined as parties to the suit. Petition as against other respondents to stand dismissed. Undertaking given in the consent terms are accepted. Petition disposed off accordingly. 2. Company Application stands dismissed in veiw of the petition itself being disposed off in terms of the consent terms. The newly added parties will file vakalatnama in the course of their hearing. SD/- *********