/'^^ j IA -»SB"'":"1 ^r< ^ OF AT W.P. N0. 3389/2011 PBTITIONER: Piaintiff RBSPONDBNTS: Defeadaiits VERSUS 1. 2. 3. 4. Raai Maiiohat', Aged about 52 yeai's, S/o Maharajdeen, R/o Meduka, Distt. Bilaspiir (C.G.). Raoi Kuraar aged about 5 1 yeai's, S/o Mahai'e.jdeen, Mohaii Lal, aged about 29 years, S/o Devidayal, Smt. Matiiuri Wd/o Devi Dayal AU R/o Vmage Mediika, Tatisil & District Bilaspur (C.G.). State of C.G. fhrough fhe CoUector, BIiaspur (C.G.). WRET PETITION ARTICLB 227 OP THB CONSTITUTION OF IHDIA. :Hon?bIe Mr. T.P.Shasma, J.j Present:- Shri Basaiit Kaiwai'tya, Advocate for tlie petitioner. Shri AkhU Agrawal, P,L. for the State/respondent No, 4 on adyance uotice. Respondents No, 1 to 3 iiot noticed. ORDBR (Passedoa 14/09/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of tlie Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality aiid propiiely of Uie order dated 29/6/96 passed by Civil Judge Class-I, Pendra Road in civil suit No. 42A/2000 (Old No. 40A/1976) whereby CivilJiidge Class-I has dismissed the application filed for takiag docunient on i:ecord, Order was chatlenged before tlie High Court of Judicatiire at Jabalpur iii civil revision No. 1208/1996 aad stay was graiited vide order dated 15/7/96. On 30/6/2005 aforesaid revision was dismissed as witbdrawn. After 2005 present petitioner has filed this petition uiider Article 227 of the Constitiition of India, On due consideratioii, I do not fiiid aiiy iUegalily or aiiy canse for fiUiig such petition even after more thaii 6 years from witlidrawal of revisioii on 17/8/2011, Consequently, petition is Uable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs, Interiin appUcation stan.ds disposed of. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge -r^