IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 12th day of August, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 756 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Mukund Gaeen S/o Girish Gaeen R/o Village Gurugram No. 2, Shaktifarm, Police Station Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. ………… Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ………… Opposite Party Arising out of F.I.R. No. 84 of 2010 Under Sections: 304-B of I.P.C. & ¾ of D.P. Act Police Station: Sitarganj District: Udham Singh Nagar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, Addl. Government Advocate, present for respondent State. Applicant Mukund Gaeen, who is in jail in connection with F.I.R. No. 84 of 2010, relating to offence punishable under Section 304-B of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, police station Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that no specific role has been assigned in the first information report to the applicant. It is also pleaded that from the postmortem report it appears that the cause of death of the deceased could not be ascertained. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Mukund Gaeen be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. (Prafulla.C. Pant, J.) Dt. 12.08.2010 H.Negi 3