IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6398 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.10.2011 Smt.Krishna Wanti ....Petitioner Versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Ms.Monika Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** Jitendra Chauhan, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 7.5.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana vide which the evidence of the plaintiff/petitioner was closed by order of the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to para no.3 of the petition wherein the zimini orders passed by learned trial court have been reproduced and states that on many occasions, witnesses were present, but they were not cross-examined by the learned counsel for the defendants. The witnesses sought to be examined are the Government employees and they have been duly served. CR No. 6398 of 2011 (O&M) -2- I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. Keeping in view the fact that the witnesses sought to be examined are material witnesses and their non-examination would materially affect the proper adjudication, in the interest of justice, one last opportunity can be granted to the plaintiff/petitioner to conclude her entire evidence. Accordingly, the present revision petition is allowed; impugned order dated 7.5.2011 (Annexure P-1) is set aside and the learned Trial Court is directed to grant one last opportunity to the petitioner-plaintiff to conclude her entire evidence at her own responsibility, subject to payment of ` 5,000/- as cost. 19.10.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) gsv JUDGE