IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8925 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 8925 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 8925 OF 2005. Shri Chandrakant Siddhappa Nimbargi. ... Petitioner. V/s. Kolhapur Municipal Transport and others. ... Respondents. Ms.Ranjana Todankar i/b.S.S.Pakale for the petitioner. D.S.Sawant for respondent No.1. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 13th April 2006. DATED: 13th April 2006. DATED: 13th April 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned for the petitioner. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Court below is a reasonable and possible view. No perversity could be demonstrated by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)