IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.2478-M of 2008 Date of Decision:11.2.2011 Mohd. Idris and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gurveen H. Singh, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.37 dated 28.11.2006 registered under Sections 498- A,406,120-B IPC and under Sections 3,4, and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station City Malerkotla, District Sangrur. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Ajaib Singh states that out of 18 witnesses, 7 witnesses have since been examined. In view of the said fact, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the requisite pleas before the trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, the personal appearance of the petitioners is exempted before the trial Court except as and when required. 11.2.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE