IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29766 of 2011 Parmeshwar Thakur, son of late Indrasan Thakur, resident of village – Gaunaha, P.S. – Gaunaha, District – West Champaran. --------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Parmila Devi, daughter of late Harinandan Thakur, resident of village – Sithi, P.S. – Gaunaha, District – West Champaran. ------- Opposite Parties. ****** 02. 27.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Trial No. 3306 of 2011 arising out of Complaint Case no. 616-C of 2010, for the offences under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry torture etc. Submission is that under compelling circumstances after being father of two female children petitioner had to file matrimonial case o. 303/2009, before Principal Judge, Family Court, West Champaran, Bettiah, seeking dissolution of marriage and decree of divorce. Further submission is that there is neither any order nor any attempt is made on behalf of the Opposite Party no. 2 for interim maintenance, but petitioner offers to pay a sum of Rs. 800/- per month by of interim maintenance to the complainant who is one and only wife subject to any order of competent court on the point. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of filing an application before the court below stating such intention and start making payment, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above- named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Pranav Shankar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Trial No. 3306 of 2011 arising out of Complaint Case no. 616-C of 2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation or any default in payment, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)