1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.754 OF 2009 Hanuman Dhondu Bhoir .. Petitioner. -versus- The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ......... Mr.Sunilkumar Rathore, advocate for the applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for State. ......... CORAM: Smt. RANJANA DESAI & R. G. KETKAR JJ. DATED: 15th July, 2009. P.C. 1. The petitioner has preferred this Application through the Jail. His case is that while convicting him learned Judge has not given him benefit of set off as provided under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Operative part of the impugned judgment shows that learned Sessions Judge has given a specific direction that all the accused are entitled for set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The relevant sentence run as follows: “ All these accused are entitled for set off u.s. 428 Cr.P.C. for the period undergone by them in this offence.” 2 2. In view of this the Application does not survive and is disposed of as such. 3. The present order be communicated to the Applicant in the Jail. (R.G. KETKAR, J) (Smt. RANJANA DESAI, J)