IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22115 of 2010 NITYA SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that this petitioner along with other accused came and forcibly taken away the copy of the sanctioned order receipt and Rs. 2,000/- from the pocket of the informant. It is also stated that the firing was made in the air to create terror. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the same occurrence Karpi P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010 as contained in Annexure-2 was filed on behalf of the petitioners in which the informant of the present is an accused. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation of firing is against Ramanuj Sharma and the allegation of taking the receipt and 2,000/- rupees is against Uday Sharma. Considering the fact that there is no 2 allegation of firing against the petitioner and there is a case and counter case levelling similar allegation against each other, let the petitioner, namely, Nitya Sharma in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Karpi (Banshi) P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)