IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6310 of 2011 Date of decision : 29-11-2011 Suman Lata .... Petitioner VERSUS The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present: Mr. S.P. Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr. H.N. Mehtani, Advocate, for respondent No.3. MAHESH GROVER, J. (Oral) The instant petition is totally misconceived as it has been pointed out by Sh. Mehtani, Advocate appearing for Haryana Public Service Commission that the petitioner in fact secured 43 marks whereas in the petition it is mentioned that she has got 63 marks. It has been pointed out that petitioner has even mentioned her roll number and likewise her category erroneously. Thus, the petition is based on incorrect facts and the same is dismissed. (MAHESH GROVER) 29-11-2011 JUDGE manju