IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: R.KANTHA RAO A.S. Nos.2581 & 2284 of 2003 AS. NO. 2581 OF 2003: (Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the order of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, at Vijayawada, made in O.S. No. 26 of 1999, dated 20- 3-2003) Between: 1. Manapareddy Latha, W/o. Venkatarao, R/o D.No.13-334, Sithanagaram, Guntur,. Guntur District. 2. Manapareddy Madhuri, D/o. Venkata Rao, aged about 3 years, Minor 3. Manaparedy Gowtham, S/o. Venkata Rao, aged about 1 year, Minor (Appellants 2 and 3 are being minors, rep. by their mother and next friend M. Latha 1st Appellant) Appellants/Plaintiffs AND Manapareddy Venkata Rao, S/o. Tata Rao, Train Ticket Examiner, and Residing at D.No.16-3-22, Kowthavari Street, Purnanandapet, Vijayawada-2, Krishna District. Respondent/Defendant Counsel for the Appellants : SRI P.VINAYAKA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent : SRI K. VENKTESH AS. NO. 2284 OF 2003: Appeal under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act r/w Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, against the order of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Vijayawada, made in O.P. No. 53 of 2000, dt: 20-3-2003. BETWEEN: Manapareddy Venkatarao S/o Tatarao Appellant/Petitioner AND Manapareddy Latha W/o Venkatarao, R/o D.No. 13-334, Sithanagaram, Guntur District. Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : SRI K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent : SRI P.VINAYAKA SWAMY ORDER: “Both the parties present before the Court. O.P. filed by the husband for divorce was dismissed, against which he filed appeal. The wife and the minor children also filed O.P. for maintenance was also dismissed, against which they also filed appeal. This court by order dated: 02-11-2004 directed the husband to pay an amount of Rs. 1,000/- to each petitioner towards interim maintenance from 01-11-2004 and thereafter, as per the orders of this Court dated: 30- 11-2006, the interim maintenance was enhanced to Rs. 1500/- from January, 2006, which is being paid regularly. Now the husband submitted that he has no interest in seeking the divorce. The husband and wife have fruitful talks among themselves and agree that they would lead marital life happily. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, post on 22-02-2013 for appearance of both parties along with appropriate application for settlement of their disputes.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Judge, Family Court, at Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. Manaparedy Venkata Rao, S/o. Tata Rao, Train Ticket Examiner, and Residing at D.No.16-3-22, Kowthavari Street, Purnanandapet, Vijayawada-2, Krishna District. (BY SPEED POST/RPAD) 3. Manapareddy Latha, W/o. Venkatarao, R/o D.No.13-334, Sithanagaram, Guntur, Guntur District. (for herself and on behalf of 1.Manapareddy Madhuri, and 2. Manaparedy Gowtham, being minors) (BY SPEED POST/RPAD) 4. One CC to Sri. P. Vinayaka Swamy, Advocate, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OPUC) 5. One CC to Sri K.Venkatesh, Advocate (OPUC) 6. Two Spare copies HIGH COURT VEJ & RKRJ DATE: 20-12-2012 NOTE: POST ON 22-02-2013 ORDER AS. NOS. 2581 & 2284 OF 2003 DIRECTION