tor'^ h^w i«'l'ii!<! •[-;i!l|tj"f'!r<)!n! HK3HCOURT OF CMUATreGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.1873 OF 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2. 3. 4. 5. Smt. Shobha ChQMdharyfcJ9teJS MK. Choudhary, i^ed 52 yet^,; ©eeupdion Servtee, F^esendfcposlfit s®;;AeB;>yntent at P.G. Uinafte Giris Nti-^Sec. Schoot, Shantinagar, Ralpur ^G). a Versus State OS C.G., through Sscretay, Schobl EducaUon Department, Mantrateya, D.K,S.Bhawan, Raupur(CG). The Director, Dlrectorate, Publte Educatfon, Raipur. The Disfrid Educafion Officer, Raipur, Principal, P.G. UmaUie Gjri? Migher Secondaiy School.Shantins^ar, Raipur. Snrt. Sudha Gupta, Asstt. ©rade-II, P.G. Umathe Girts HigheF Sieeondary-iSSchool, Shantlnagar, Rafpur (CG). (Writ PeUtion uncter Arficte 226 of the ConsBtufion of India) Single Bench; Hoi'i'tsfe Shri Satj»hK.Agnihofri, J. Present:- snrit.S.Sahu.counselfoFthepetltloner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. ^lvocate with Ms Smta Ghai, Ransl La^CT for the State. JffiDEB (Passed on this 26m day of Maroh, 2009) Wrth the consent of teamed counsel a(8»aBin8^)r t>e-parti^. th® petition is heard finally. 2) Leamed counsel appearing for the petUiQner submits that the peUBoner does not want to conte^t the matt$r, atfite sts^^. However, leamed counsel pra^thattheifesipondefftfltrth'oriitesmay be direded to consider the pending repre^ntation pf tti^.,pett'^ner vi^irt a period. 3) Shri Sao, teamed Govt. Advocate wjtti Ms Ghai.leamed F^inel Lffl^er sybmite th^ ffttft i9pn9senta m Mtt^-(» BnniKJ5pen<^ng, the same shall be considered and tlecided in accwdance vwth law, OT its <wn merits, as eariyas possit>tepreferablywithina^riodljOfsixMsel®fr(mithe date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 4) In view of the (oregolng, accoreling to leanted eaunsel fbr the petifloner, nothing survives in this peUtion for adjutacation. 5) Accordingly, Bw wrft p^ih'on slaiKfe djsposed of. v ^^ tooW ^Sf' ESgSii i ^SSSs^. 'l E^s^N.. ? EfiS8®;! BIIS BBSB BBB: sssss, B^s^?!4 .>'•' ESS® s E^:^:l E BSSi'r ^i?SS. '^^'/•^"^^ BSB RSHI E .1!.