wm Petition N0239§l2003 . ‘ PEITIIONER : Dr (Sum) Vibha Dadheach W/o 12k. Puru Dadheech, aged about 51 yeam, Woxidng as Reader (Katthak) —- Wed, R10 Abhinav Bhawan, 59/2, Civil Lines, Khairagaxh, Rajnandgaon (CG). — Vasus-, RFBPONDENT : ‘ Incka Kala 5angeet Vlshvidyalaya, ' arh, Thmugh its Ragstrar, X IQIairagaxh, Rajnandgacn (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2g6i22’7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE REPRESENTATION. / X \QQ HEGH €QURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB. HQN’BLE MR-SATISE K. AGNIHGTR! J. ¥VR1T §3ETITEQN NQ3Z’78 ()1? 2MB D i etitionei‘ Dr. (Sult) Vibha Dadheech % V6131! S Respcndant Indira KalSangeet Vishvidyalava, Khaia’aga‘z'h Mix Pi‘ashaiat Jaéswal, Seniar Advocate with Mr. Atul Kumar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Manindra Shxivasmva, Sanior Advacata with Mr. Amit Vanna, counsel for the respondent. Mr. Ashok Vaishaav, couilsel for the inteweer. il Pi'eseat : ORDER (Passed on 31$ ofAugusf. 2006) Pursuant to advextisement No.(No.RD/987) Notiflcatiood/98 {Annexure P- ) issued by the respcmdent — Iiicfil'a Kaia Sangeet Vishwavidyalaya, Khairagarh, the petitioner applied for appointment on fhe post of Professor and Reader. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Reader in Kathak Dance by order dated 22—3m2000 (Annemlre P—4). The executive eommittee in its meeting dated 25-9-2003 found that the iiifonnation submitted by é‘ b$ the petitiozler was mt correct. Accordingly, 1161' appointmant 0n the {305$ of Raadsz‘ was cancelled by ordat dat€d 26—9=2003 (Aimcxure P45). Last para 0f ‘rhe ordar provideS for appeal before tribanal to be constituted under Ssction 44(2) of the Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1956 (henceférth “the Act”). The tn’bimal, I am infamwd, cmmists of expats in the fleld, evan otharwisc, this is a statutoxy prevision nadcr the provisions of tho Act. 3%“ 2. Lcamed counscl appearmg for thc pctttioncr, on izlstructioo, submits that thc petitioncr be permitted to apptoach the respoodeot — University for cozistittition of a tribtmal under Section ‘ 44(2) of the Act to hear appeal of the petitiooet. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent — Uzaiversity has no objection. 3. This petitiott is accordingly disposed of with the above— stated liberty. No order as to costs. Certified copy as pet rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge \ / ,rrirr..m t // / l(7‘ Gopal