IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8937 of 2004 Between: E.Jeevan S/o late E.C.Srinivasulu Plot No.152 Telephone Colony, Ramakrishna Puram Saroornagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief General Manager AP. Telecom , BSNL Hyderabad-500 001 2 The Asst. General Manager (legal) O/o C.G.M.A.P. Telecom , BSNL, Hyderabad-500 001 3 The Accounts Officer (Cash) O/o C.G.M. AP. Telcom, BSNL Hyderabad-500 001 4 The Asst. Engineer (Stores) O/o C.G.M. AP. Telcom, BSNL Musheerabad Hyderabad-500 001 5 E.Manohar Rani Plot No.152, Telephone Colony Ramakrishna Puram Saroornagar, Hyderabad. 6 The Divisional Engineer (CTSD) BSNL Musheerabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of 'Certiorari' calling for the records relating to the order dt. 29/03/2004 passed in OA.No.269/2004 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad bench and set aside the same as unjust and without any basis and also set aside the enquiry and enquiry report dt. 23/12/2003 of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the judicial precedents and declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not furnishing the copies of the evidence of the Respondent No.5 in the Said enquiry to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and direct the respondent 2 to furnish the copy of the evidence of the Respondents No. 5 to the petitioner and further direct the respondents to make payment of terminal benefits to the petitioner forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.B.NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER:- (PER GB,J.) The Writ Petition is filed challenging the order, dated 29.03.2004, passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A.No.269 of 2004. 2. Pending disposal of the Writ Petition, the legal representatives of the deceased employee filed Compromise Memo with regard to the sharing of the retirement benefits and requested this Court to pass orders in terms of compromise memo. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Compromise Memo. A copy of the compromise memo shall be annexed to this order. No costs. _____________________ G. BIKSHAPATHY, J ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J Date: 08.04.2005 ES To 1 The Chief General Manager AP. Telecom, BSNL Hyderabad-500 001 2 The Asst. General Manager (legal) O/o C.G.M.A.P. Telecom, BSNL, Hyderabad- 500 001 3 The Accounts Officer (Cash) O/o C.G.M. AP. Telcom, BSNL Hyderabad-500 001 4 The Asst. Engineer (Stores) O/o C.G.M. AP. Telcom, BSNL Musheerabad Hyderabad-500 001 5 The Divisional Engineer (CTSD) BSNL Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 6 2 CD copies