;^^¥^1 ^ / ' 'K' [Off IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fSiNo. 2-6SZ- OF2011. PETITIONER .-isM>:. ^^^€^ ^^' .."•"" Sudarshan Kumar-Mandal, S/o. Shri S. K. Mandal, aged about 31 years, R/o. Ward Bakharupara, Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, . Urban Administrative & Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Commissioner/ Director, Directorate, Urban Administrative & Development Department, Raipur (C. G.) 3. Chief Municipality Offlcer, Nagar Panchayat Narayanpur, Distt. Narayanpur, (C.G.) 4. President in Council, Nagar Panchayat Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) ^^ ? (I ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3TT^T ^T fqiw ^H^RT^^W *<I*ICTI $h*ll<!h 7^r T^i^i<n<-i, ^nl^^Ko, f^cni^y ..^££y..ls..3.LU.^200 3TT^T TT?^ (licl(<l<t<<^) 1'^iTW ^f?^ 3?1^?T fSB : Hon*l>le Shrt Mamindlra Mohan Shrivastava, J.1 12.5.2011 Shri Somkant Vermaj Shri P. Bhaduri, Pafrel copy. Heard on admission. petlponer representalion ex^lanation Grievance of the petilioner is that tbou^i fhe petitiofrier Sanitary Inspector, order o| It is submitted fhal Committee, vide his mem^ for appomtment of fhe petitioner filed CoUector has called for Nagar Panchayat, Narayanipur, Leamed counsel for fhe St4te been taken. From meino dated 2^, has called for explanation Panchayat, Narayanpiir. II consideiution before fhe In fhese ctrciunstanc^s, m fhe matter. The petitiojjier request for expeditious 4>l^{<r1^)*1 T?R^Jf ^ f^st <f^t^l< '^'sffimw^T counsel for the petitioner. Lawyer for fhe State, on advance oner, ventilated tlirough fhis petition, was selected for appointment as appotntment has not been issued. Secretary of fhe District Selection dated 15.9.2010, has recommended ioner. When no order was passed, the to fhe CoUector. Whereafter, fhe from Chief Municipal Officer, >ur, vide his memo dated 29.10.2010. submits ttiat tiU date, no action has 29J. 10.2010, it appears fhat fhe CoUector l|rom the ChiefMunicipal Offlcer, Nagar appears fhat the matter is pending CcjUector. >, let the CoUector take final decision shaU approach fhe Coltector with disposal of his case. If such ^^ .y^ ^•ii-i.Sfc-' •^^ '^^^^' 1 XI-HC—78 3?T^T "^T'f^fNF ^WT 311^T'3RN»' <.} Eraveen. V7" T 'TST T^i<4i<n^, ^^I-(H<I^, [®ldt-(-l^<. <11HCTI Sl»*1ic»» "^200 ^n^T TT^T (lici4<s<<^) ^wit^T ^a 3?T^y ?- representation is made, fh decision iii the matter. Ifno decision is takeni date of receipt of the liberty to take recourse to repres|entation re4iedy With the aforesaid o1 disposed of. ct)i^f<n<^ri 'W^it ^ 'fe(st <P»i^i< ^^ffim^n^T e Collector shall take appropriate within a period of 6 weeks from fhe i, fhe petitioner would be at available to htm under the law. aservations, fhe petitlon is finally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge