IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 2828 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 24, 2009 Sunehra Ram ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. Naveen Daryal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner has been suspended due to his involvement in a criminal case. He was subsequently acquitted by the trial Court. During pendency of appeal he filed a civil suit for certain reliefs. The said civil suit was decided on 9.8.2003 wherein some of the reliefs claimed by the petitioner were allowed. However, thereafter by order dated 3.9.2003 this Court acquitted the petitioner in the appeal against the conviction. Now the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for seeking those reliefs which could not be granted to him by the civil court earlier in view of his conviction as well as the extra relief of grant of ACP grade. In my view the present is a case where not only does the petitioner admit existence of an equally efficacious alternate remedy rather CWP No. 2828 of 2009 -2- he has also taken recourse to it. In the circumstances this writ petition is dismissed while granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh suit claiming all the reliefs which have been claimed in this writ petition since, as mentioned above, the supervening event of his acquittal is transpired in the meanwhile. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 24 , 2009 sunita