IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2011 / 27TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1555 of 2011(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHAHIDA.A, W/O.ABBASALI,PARACHIKOTTIL HOUSE,P.O.MANKADA,PIN-679 324,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS.SRI.S.SUJIN, SMT.NITA.N.S. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, PERINTHALMANNA- 679 322. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER,MALAPPURAM- 676 001. 3. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.1555 OF 2011(T) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has been appointed as ARD No.65 of Perinthalmanna. By Ext.P1, the dealership was suspended and on its receipt petitioner has filed Ext.P2 explanation. Immediately thereafter this writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P1. 2. Now that Ext.P1 suspension has been issued and as the petitioner has filed his explanation, it is up to the respondents to consider Ext.P1 in the light of Ext.P2. Therefore I dispose of this writ petition directing that on the production of a copy of the judgment the first respondent will pass orders in the matter taking note of Ext.P2 objection filed by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :