(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITIONS NO.99, 100,101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106 AND 107 OF 2004. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. B.B. Lakakar with Mr. S. Taleigaonkar, Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. H.D. Naik, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM : N.N. MHATRE & P.V. HARDAS, JJ. DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2004. P.C.: The Petition challenges the Order dated 9th October, 2002 retrenching the Petitioner from service of Respondent No.2. The learned Advocate General submits that the Respondent No.2 is an industry and therefore the Petitioner has an alternate remedy which must be exhausted. We have no doubt that a Writ Petition against the impugned order - 2 - is not maintainable and the proper remedy would be to raise an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act. Dismissed. NISHITA MHATRE, J. P.V. HARDAS, J. sl.