IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 22384 of 2005 Between: Chakka Kasi Viswantham S/o.Suryanarayana Murthy R/o.7-2-4 Govt. Girls High School Road, Narsapur, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Bank of Hyderabad rep by its Asst.General Manager (Authorised Officer) Region 3, Visakhapatnam. 2 The State Bank of Hyderabad, rep by its Branch Manager, Narspur, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the notice dt.30.8.2005 receigned on 23.9.2005 issued under Sec.13-2 of Securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of Security interest Act 2002 to one Mr.Nagasuryanarayana as illegal, improper arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess petitioner residential houses bearing No.7-2-2 and 7-2-4 pursuant to the notice dt.30.8.2005 issued by the respondent Bank to Mr.Nagasuryanarayana and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BOKKA SATYANARAYANA & KAMLA SEELAM B. Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.V.SIMHADRI The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 22384 of 2005 O R D E R : Learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 21-01-2009 KLP