FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1252 OF 2010 (Usha Pandurang Chothe Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ For the nature of relief claimed in this petition, we do not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondent Nos. 3 to 5. In as much as, the petitioner is seeking limited relief to direct respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to decide the representations annexed at Exhibit “C” (Collectively) in terms of Rule 115 of the Maharashtra Civil services (Pension) Rules 1982 for entering the name of the petitioner as the nominee of respondent No.6 for family pension and other retiral benefits. That is a matter which will have to be considered in the first place by respondent Nos. 3 to 5. In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of with direction to respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to expeditiously dispose of the representations preferred by the petitioner, annexed at Exhibit “C” (Collectively), in any case not later than three months from today. All questions are left open. The said respondents shall communicate the order, as is passed, to the petitioner within such time. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) Date:.23.02.2010. rlj/