HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH, BILASPUR W.P.ISI No. 6801 of 2006 PETITIONBR Kailash Paaigrahi (D.Ed.), aged about 36 years, son of Shri Daulat Raiu Panigrahi, Assistaat Teacher, Govemment Prunary School Bokraiauda, Vikas Khaad Baiamkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) Vcrsus RESPONDEN're 1 State of Chbatdsgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Suigh Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Assistant Couunissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ PetiUQS uader Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for fhe State on advance copy. ORALORDER (24.08.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subauts that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. exanuaation on his own. expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advau.ee iacreiiients according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also subniits fhat in m.aay identical inatters, fh.e petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed ia fhe case of Yashwemt Kv.fncsr Bharoidweii Vs. lSiinlcipa.1 CorporaUon, Du.rs cmd anotfaer /2006 ffQ 3SPJR-CG 96?. He submits fhat fhe case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judginent. This legal position is not disputed by fhe leamed counsel for the State. However, he subinits fhat fhe order niay be passed ia terms of ttie said judgment, but it shatl be subjected to verification regardtug petitioner's such quali&cation. _^ r W.P.fS) No. 6801 of 2006 Accordiagly, fhis writ petition-is aBowed ia tenns of fhe order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpa} Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher the petitioner had acquired D.Bd. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance iacreiaents or not The petition staiids fiaally disposed of. No order as to costs. ~~~———-— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti