IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 1462 of 1997 Date of Decision: July 28, 2011 Madanjit Singh . ….Petitioner Versus Dr. Indu Malhotra and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Raghvir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. B.S. Sewek, Advocate, for respondent No.2. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2, states that respondents have not violated any order passed by the Financial Commissioner, Revenue. He has further stated that revenue authorities sanctioning the mutation are not the Court, therefore, there is no question of contempt of Court. He has further stated that respondents are tendering their unconditional apology. COCP No.1462 of 1997 Since none is present on behalf of the petitioner, I accept unconditional apology on behalf of the respondents. Present contempt petition is disposed of accordingly and notice served on the respondents stands discharged. July 28, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2