IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.592 of 2011 TULI SINGH @ VIJAY KUMAR SINGH @ VIJAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. There is specific allegation against the petitioner, that he opened fire on deceased as a result of which deceased died. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner tried to convince me about this fact that the informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence, because according to prosecution case itself the alleged occurrence took place on 15.5.2010 at about 08.30 P.M. whereas the fardbeyan of the informant was recorded on 16.5.2010, particularly, in the circumstance when the police station was hardly 3 K.M. away from the place of occurrence but, I am not at all convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as circumstances of the case the prayer of the bail of the petitioner in connection with S. Tr. No.790 of 2010 arising out of Parsa P.S. Case No.43 of 2010 stands rejected. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)