1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REV. APPLICATION NO.382 OF 2004 State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Vijay Shripat Shirke .. Respondent Mr.D.R.More, A.P.P. for applicant Mr.C.K.Pendse for respondent Nos. 1 to 8 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30th November 2006. P.C. . The order under challenge is interlocutory order delivered during the course of trial and that too on 11th October 2002 in Special Case No.11 of 2002 below Exh.41. 2 2. No useful purpose will be served by now considering rival contentions, inasmuch as, trial in the Special Case must have been concluded by now. That apart, the order under challenge being interlocutory, it would always be open for State to raise the contentions as are raised in the present revision application while challenging final order, if the same is adverse to the prosecution. Application disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)