^" c 3 .r..^l IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. No. ^ / 2009 /•• APPLICANT PETITIONER ^•s^ ~^^" Vijay Pal Sharma, Son of Late Shri Bhagwati Prasad Sharma, aged about 68 years, retired Deputy Director (Agriculture), resident of Near Patrakar Colony, Ring Road No. 2, Bilaspur, DistricLBilaspur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS NON-APPLICANT RESPONDENTS 1. State of Madhya Pradesh through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantrataya Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 2. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Director, Agriculture Department, Vindhyachal Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 4. Joint Director, Agriculture Department Bilaspur, District Bitaspur, Chhattisgarh APPLICATLON FOR RESTORATION^NB-REGALLINGJDJE-GRtJERTlOTEDT fsF ^09.02.207 IN)W.P.(S) No. 3622/2005 PASSED BY HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI 'S.K. AGNIHOTRI '©I n Appiicant HiGH COURT.OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR M.C.C.No.55of200S VljayPal Sharma Non-AeNjc^nfe Versus State of Vadhya Pradesh & Others (Aopiication forrestoratjon ofW.P.(S) No.3622/2005} Single Sench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. . "0 Present 1. 2. 3. ^ 4. 5. 6.' yown Shri Amrito Das, counse! forthe appjjcant. Shri N.N. Roy, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORDER{ORAU (Passed on thjs 17th day of November, 2009) i.A.No.1, applicatlon for condonation of delay in fljing the yCC. By ordar dated 26-2-2009 notlce was Issyed on appllcatlon for condonation of delay in presence of tearned; counsei appearing for the State. The^ matter was: again taken up fori-hearing on 11-8-2009. The State: cp.uid not flle any reply to the said japplication and sought fbr three weeks time, but tili date no response ihas been^fiied.- Having regsrd to the facts situation of ths case, in spite of granting flme ;to the State, no: reply has been flled. Even: otherwlse, reasonabie and sufficient cause has been shpwn by the applicant for condonatJonofdelayinfilingtheMCC.Deiayijscondoned. Learned coun^ei appearihg fbr the appjicant submits thatthe counsel for the appilcant couid not appear cn account of bona ^cte mlstake; thsrefore, W.P. (S) No.3622 of 2005, which was dismissedon 9-2-2ex)7, may berestored to its 111®. Reasonable and sufflcjent cause has-been shown, VV.P/ (S) No.3622 of2005 is restored to the origlnai fiie, subjectto payment of a cost of Rs.500/- to the High Court LegaS Ald Committee. A copy of thls order be piaced on record of the origJna.1 wrlt petltion and the same be llsted for hearing. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge