IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3263 OF 2009 Shri Sahebrao K. Pangavhane and others. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar i/by Mr. S.B. Deshmukh for petitioners. Ms. P.H. Kantharia, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent Nos.1 and 37. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C. J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 11TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. The learned advocate appearing for petitioners submitted that the order of attachment dated 28th November, 2009 referred to in the petition was passed in pursuance of the orders dated 4th November, 2009 and 10th December, 2009 passed by this court. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has submitted that the belief of the learned advocate for petitioner is not correct and she has drawn our attention to the contents of paras 12,13 and 15 of the affidavit filed by Shri Pradhyumna Rajaram Patil, Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Niphad Division, District Nashik. 3. Upon perusal of the said affidavit and the orders of this court referred to by the learned advocate for the petitioners, we believe that the order of attachment was not passed in pursuance of any order of this court. 4. In view of this clarification, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition so as to enable the petitioners to take available legal recourse for getting the order of attachment modified or removed. In view of this, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.