: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.594 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.689 OF 2008 Brijmohan Gupta ..Appellant. Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Navin Parekh with Ms.Hetal Patel for the Appellant. Smt.Geeta Jogalekar for Respondent no.1. Ms.S.V.Gajare, A.G.P. for Respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr.Hitesh Jain with Usman i/b.M/s.ALMT Legal for Respondent no.4. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2008 DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The Plaintiff’s case is unsustainable. The Plaintiff objects to a public signage, giving directions to various places in the city. The objection is that the signage obstructs the Plaintiff’s hoarding. The Plaintiff’s hoarding is at a distance of 500 ft. 2. The photographs annexed are misleading. Photographs if taken from the height in line, it can always be made to appear that the public signage : 2 : obstructs the Plaintiff’s hoarding even from a much greater distance. 3. In the circumstances, the Appeal from Order is dismissed. The Civil Application is also disposed of accordingly.