THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 12694 of 1995 05-12-2006 Between:- V. Satyanandam and one hundred and ninety others. Petitioner And State of A.P., rep by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad and two others. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No.12694 of 1995 Oral order: Heard Sri V. Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of the law declared in SECY., STATE OF KARNATAKA v. UMADEVI 1, the grievance of the petitioners and the relief sought by them (i.e, to declare G.O.Ms.No.193 General Administration (Poll.O) Department dated 12-05-1995 as illegal and the action of the respondents in terminating the services of the petitioners by the third respondent without absorbing them in any other Corporation/Government Departments), is misconceived. The petitioners are casual/temporary/adhoc employees of third respondent- Corporation and in G.O.Ms.No. 193 (impugned herein) the State Government after examining the report of the Committee for restructuring State Level Public Enterprises and Co-operative Enterprises decided to wind up the third respondent-Corporation whereat the petitioners were working on a casual/temporary/adhoc basis. As a consequence, the petitioners apprehend termination from service and have sought the relief already adverted to. In view of the law declared in SECY. STATE OF KARNATAKA case (supra), the relief sought by the petitioners cannot be granted. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated:05-12-2006 Pvks/* 1 2006(4)SCC1