IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7559 of 2010 SRI NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2 30.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Company. A set of allegation made by the petitioner against selection of dealership under physical handicapped category was investigated by the respondents authority within the mechanism set up in this regard. Petitioner was informed vide annexure-14 that the mark awarded to first candidate with regard to his educational qualification has been found to be correct and the same does not require any reconsideration. The complaint against the second empanel candidate, namely, Santosh Kumar there is remark that the same does not substantiate. Petitioner is not satisfied with the said communication number one because it is cryptic kind of communication and secondly that he discovered some more material which challenge the selection of first empanel candidate. The investigating mode in which the petitioner has embarked is not going to be ceased by the High Court. The petitioner can continue writing letters and lodging complaints but whether the same has any substance will have to be looked into by the Corporation. The stage for interference has not yet reached. - 2 - This writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter with the Corporation on the new found allegation which he has placed in the writ application. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)