^,-' (p , e. ,r^" IN THE HIGH COORT OS CHHATTISGABH AT BILASPUR. r.p. No. ,/-'?z/^/2ooi. PETmONER RESPONDENTS ,!^J ^^••^^^ -^c^7^ ...-•;:^^%-* .^S^IS^''7""^ ' „<;...... *^""- U.N.Choubey s/o Jwala Qioubey, aged about 42 years, Asst. Grade II, Governmeat Polytecbaique, Amb.lkapur, Distt. Surguja, C.G. VE R SU S. :l.The State of Chhattisgarh, tbrough tbe Secretary, tlan Power Plannlng, Raipur, C,G. 2.Additional Director, Techni.cal Education, Raipur, C.G. S.PrJ.nclpal. Government Polyfeechnlque Ambllcapur, Dlstt. Surguja, C.G. WRIT PBTmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA. i--lcularg__o£ the petit.i.oner; -E ?^^ i"XI-HC-2Z: sn^i^ sn^r g^wFTnro 75T •^l^d'M/'Entl*]*!®,Rcil'My ViSSM .w»-p-*-i-74e/2oei, sn^l •g^igT •gft?r Further two diiliarea of at the local schooXs. l£| ^iNcpft^'RreTt''? fe^t <F>!«|< ^7 3?f;tTR'SiT^I 9.10.2001 ; Shri Sunil Sinhb for the petitioner. Shri Deep Kesha^wanl learned caansel for tha State. Mr. Kesharwanl sltates thatthis matter should be exainied by the State AdmlihJ-s'trative Tribanal. Shrisinha states that whea the pet|ition was submitted before this Court.the Tribunal wgs njst functioning. Now it 1s func- tioning, The brder impug|ied was issued on 5.7.2001. It is anorder o£ transfer. |The petitioner took leave aad he has not joined the new p|lace of posting. The parents of the wrtt pet.i.tioner are |0ld and both are having siclaiesses. !the writ petltioner ara s the petltioner is to join at the new place of posting in |terms o£ ths order o£ transfer 4. great hardship will be ^aused to thg family. Therefore, it is suhnnitted that on |iumanitarion ground.the petitioner may be allowed to stay tjill the end o£ academic session which will be about the |snd o£ Jana^2002. It is fiu-ther stated that the petitioi<er has made repcesentation toefore ,e competent authority pegarding difficalt ciraumstances faaed by the writ petitjjoner. * After givlng a icareful thou^it to the submisaions f^ 1 S1! ?RT !iT l SlTc^aTT R;r?3T5;iR?' a^tiTC' cfel SVS^ '<acc, ('^qif.'sii 2.. 3?i^?i'eTfllw ^rfta ^iTqRTT^T iITCRTf-q •RTS7 •CT3R?R •^-STT^Tq 3TR?r I am o£ the view that the icompetent authority should examiae the arrepr^sentation of the writ petitioner sympatheticallil' ,taking into consi- deration various circumst^nces that the wrlt petitioner has highlighte<|l in the fcepresentation. p-7 is the forwa^ding letter o£ the local authority. Tbe said repre^entation is pendl.ng before theAddltional Director.T^chnical Education ( res- pondent no.2). L«t the wr^-t petltioner c^_ ^e- fresh aopy o£ the sa: ! with the copy o£ this ord^r before the said authority within 10 days £rom todayj, The Additional Director, Technical educatl.on shall thereafter proceed to examine the repcesentatioa on mer^t and pass necessary final orders. until representatlon is finally disposed^!^a ths icrit petiUoner shall) be allowed to cont inue..—— -fc^ €^- i.;.if\JLAX ^k<_ -C :.c. i~if^e-^^ \\ Sd/- Chief Justice