IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.233 of 2009 Pradeep Kumar s/o Kamlesh Kumar Mishra ..Petitioner ..Petitioner ..Petitioner. vs. vs. vs. The State of Maharashtra & 2 Ors ..Respondents. Respondents. Respondents. Mr K. K. Mishra, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr B. V. Phadnis, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr R.D. Oak, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J. AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 13TH APRIL,2009. DATED : 13TH APRIL,2009. DATED : 13TH APRIL,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the University submits that in view of the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1813/2003 dated 14.7.2006 the University will allow the petitioner to appear for examination. He further submits that as per an interim order passed by this Court dated 6.3.2009, the petitioner may remain present for examination and the respondent No.2 would permit him to appear in the examination. However, the result of the examination would be subject to the decision of the Committee and the petitioner will not be entitled to claim any equity or any benefit from the interim order passed by this Court. 2. The writ petition is disposed of in view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the University. 3. Liberty to the petitioner to approach the Equivalence Committee which shall decide the matter in accordance with the provisions of law. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.