IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2008 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1930 SA.No. 404 of 1995 ------------------------------ AS.29/1994 of SUB COURT, TIRUR OS.171/1991 of MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1. PALAKKAL MOOSA, S/O VEERANKUTTY HAJI, IRINGAVOOR THAMBEEHUL ISLAM SANGAM PRESIDENT, TIRUR TALUK. 2. PALAKKAL HAMZAKUTTY HAJI, S/O KUNHEETHU, IRINGAVOOR THAMBEEHUL ISLAM SANGAM SECRETARY, TIRUR TALUK. 3. K.MUHAMMED MUSALYAR, S/O VEERANKUTTY HAJI, SADARNLMU ALIM IRSADIL MUSLIMIN MADRASSA, IRINGAVOOR, TIRUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNANUNNI RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1. PALAKKAL ALAVIKUTTY, S/O MOIDEENKUTTY HAJI, RESIDING AT IRINGAVOOR AMSOM AND DESOM IN TIRUR TALUK. 2. KONDATH MUHAMMED, S/O MOIDEEN, DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is of the year 1995. When this appeal was taken up for hearing, counsel for the appellants is absent and there is no representation even on his behalf. Appellants are called. They are also absent. In the result, I dismiss this SA. 16.6.2008 SD/-K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------------------------- S.A.No.404 & 611 of 1995 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT No representation for the appellants. No steps taken, in spite of prividing separal opportunities for curing the defects. Appeals are, therefore, dismissed. Sd/- (S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN) JUDGE sk/- //true copy// P.S. To Judge.