:V: IGH COURT OF CHHA’I'I‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Wn't Peu'tion {C1 No 933 of 2009 PuJa Swasahayata Samuh Kosala through Presuient agsd 47 years, Post 85 V111age Kosala Tah an PS Pamgarh D1stt JanJglr — Champa(CG) Petitioner Versus Respondents 1.‘ State of Chhattlsgarh Through Collector, r ' Janjglr Champa, Dlstt Janjgr Champa (C G) Sub D1v1s1ona1 O$cer (Revenue) Pamgarh Dlstt Janjglr Champa Bhawana Swasahayata Samuh Kosala Post 8:; V111age Kosala, Tah 85 P S Pamgarh Dlstt Janjgn‘ Champa (C G) 211a Panchayat through Chlef Execuuve OEcer Janjglr Champa Dlstt Jan1g1r Champa (C G) 2. WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB. Hon’ble Shn Satlsh K. Agm'hou‘i J.) Shri Ami'yakant Tiwaxi, Advocate for the petiooner S1311 Vlvek Shanna, Panel Lawyer for the respongents No 1 &, 2 Shn Prateek Shanna and Shn Maz1d A11 Advocates for the respondent No 3 o R D E it {oral} (Passed on this 24th day ofJuly, 2009) Heard The pehtloner (soc1ety) has hled thJs petltlon challengmg the order dated 7.1.2009 (Annexure PI 1), passed by the Sub Divisional OEcer (Revenne), Pamgarh District Janjgir Champa whereby the respondent No 3 (soc1ety) has been perrmtted to conduct the mi/day meal 1n Government Middle School Kosla Learned counsel appearing for the petitloner submits that the petitloner ls a self help group, workmg 1n the area of village Kosa‘la, Tahsil — Pam garh. The betitioner—society was allotted the work of midday nieal for all primary schools by order dated 16 6 2005 (Annexure Pl 3) passed by the Chief Executive Ohicer Z11a Panchayat JanJgir Champa on the bas1s of the dec1s1on of the State Level Comrmttee Subsequently, by order dated 5 11 2007 (Annexure P/4), passed by the Chief Executive 0&0613 Pamgarh, the pehtloner—somety was also allotted the work of ~x\->& I ' ’\ . @, idday me in midle chools, also. Thereafter, allotment of work of midda eal n the Govt. Middle School, Kosla by the peh'or as caceled. Thus, the peiitioner-society submitted Ieprentaons (Anexure P/5 and P/6). By the impugned order ated 7. 1.2009 (nexme P/ 1) the work of midday meal in Govt. Middle chool, osla has been allotted to the respondent No.3. Th, th petitione h hled this petition. us e r as On query as to wat is the scheme, which provides for the middy ea o th students in government schools, the petioner is not i position to submit any reply. Further, to the query, as Whether there is any inhingement of statutory or legal rights, learne cOunsel appearing for the petitioner is not in poitio t ey. document has been submitted and no explanaon as bn furnished, except that the allotment has been cancelled by he. incompetent authority, whereas the llotnt w idday meal was made to the petitioner on the is of the decision of the State Level Committee. It is aarent that after approval of the Collector, the Sub. Divisiona o Renue), Pamgarh, has allotted the work 't'o te resonent .3. t a trite law that the powers exercised by an onicer of the Stat may be exercised by the superior authOrity also. No docen has een provided asto hoW'it was decided to cac th allotent oork to the petitioner. It is not possible to adjudicate upon the dispute for want of materials and submissions. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. No order asto costs. w _ ., gm- I QS tish .‘K. A'gnihotri‘f Judge t m al d s y m i 1ine, w nl seti n v d An S K , h a ml t e ti n a to d a sn o rpl No ti h ee t ame of ork of m bas pp l mcer (ev h pd No I is e umt b nel e m fw