8 ! ll T-CU fFA IDT ,1B .IIUdTTTcfi^DI. t^^T.F'tF f BIL4 ^-^friipF i .^t^S I^V: Petitioner- Lal Yodav, S/u Shri Paras Ram Vadav Aged about 39 yea's, Assistont Teacher, 6ovt. Primary School Amaldiha. Block-Pussore Raigarh [C.6.J . --^^t'^^t r^sspvriysrHS Versus 1. State of Chhottisgarh Throuah;- Secretary Education Department, &.K.S. Ruipur 2. Tne Director, Public 'nstruction, b.K.S. &haw(in, Raipw (C.6.) S'ri w 3. Juiht Dir'ectot*, Public Instruction bivision. RaJtia»+i(C.G.) 4. &t3trictEd [c.e.i WTTIicer Distt. 5. Education Officer bistt. [c.e.] U-.M'S-.IA hS.w .T"^>^:-rt S^ASsiS", r A^a^^^t^ws.?, ir10H'DI€WiP. iJUSTiCe ^sTlsn R. ^QnlrlOTTI/ J Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocats for +he peti+ioner. Mr. Vlnay Pandey, Lawyer for State/respondent: n B r» c o w... ^ ^- s*.^ (Passed on this 19" t)ay of Mar-ch, 2007) 1. The was appointed vide order 18.03.1987 os Assistant Teacher- on flxed pffy of Rs. 300,'-. After compSetion of one yew probation, die gr'anted regula' pty of Rs. 54 \^K/ ;£3/ 9 I irned cou? foi" the oetitioner submit: issue involved in the is whether, the petitioner is entitled to pay scale w.e.f. the dute of initiat oppointment or fr from the o'! a^l^"-^r;.;?^^ ^^.^ ^t^.-.^^'^^'^'s--^^ -^-^^?'^' eonipic.Tion OT prooaTiort psnoo. RVB ^ ^4- !. The invoSved, herein was considered by the Madhya Ppaded-i St<rt< ^dministr'ative T"i! '4:*^.f^4h, ofhers Vs, !, ^J^I OA.No. Yadi itate of iVt.P.A others), whepef'n it was hei'd that the Sifflllarly situated teachers are entitled to "egular pay w.e.f. the date of initiat appointmant. 'rhe mat+er taken-up to the Hon bte Supreme Coirt in Spectel Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The petition dismissed by the Hon bfe Supreme Court upholding tH( lecision of the Tribuna! to the effect that ttie Teachers/Assiatant Teochers are entitied to regutar ^<y from date of initial appointroent. 4. Learned counsel appeanng fo" the petitioner fur'fher submits that ths's Court, considerinq the same in Sushi! T'wari A Vs. St 76 of hy 5tate 6ovt. of-Chhattisgorh&other's C>V.P. (S) No. order duted 7-11-2006, Hus granted regu'a' pay' sca!e w.s.f, tiie date of initiol appointmenf. S. appear'ing for the'parties jointiy submit that this 'is squa-ely covered by th®decision of this Court in the of Sushi! Ttwari iS other's Vs, State @ovt. of Chhuttisgar'h A othen (Supr-a). 6, In vfew ofthat this petition is allotwd in the same terms, No order* • as Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge