IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35395 of 2008 RAM BABU RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 2. 12.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner was granted bail by this Court by orders passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25299 of 2004, Annexure-2 with certain conditions. It was directed that any breach of the conditions could be the ground for remanding the petitioner back to custody. The petitioner has rendered himself into custody by showing his foot to the conditions. The petitioner seeks release. The Court could not minimize or obliterate the conditions imposed upon him. Thus, the conditions and terms, as were put by the Hon’ble Judge passing the earlier order, could remain the same. A further condition which I want to put is that if the petitioner shows his foot to the conditions, he could not expect the magnanimity of the court. During hearing of the case a grievance was vented that by directing the petitioner 2 to get his attendance recorded at the police station twice in a week, what the Court has licensed for the police officers is that they were taking labour work from the petitioner. I warn them not to do it and the attendance could be fortnightly. Let the petitioner be directed to be released on his furnishing a bond in terms of the earlier order to the satisfaction of Sri P. Trivedi, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Motihari in Chakia P.S.Case No. 208 of 2001. The conditions shall remain the same as in the earlier order as also indicated in the present order. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)