IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11344 of 2010 RAM SARIKAN SINGH, S/O- LATE RAMCHANDAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMPUR MORE P.S. MINAPUR, DIST. MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ, PANCHYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. ZILA PARISHAD, MUZAFFARPUR THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER-CUM-D.C.C.ZILA PARISHAD, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 3. 22.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the counsel for the Muzaffarpur Zila Parishad Sri Abhay Kumar Sinha ‘Kundan’. 2. Petitioner was engaged as Class-IV employee on daily wage basis in the office of Zila Parishad, Muzaffarpur. His service was regularized under order bearing Memo No. 38 dated 27.5.2005, Annexure-2 but on the instructions of the District Magistrate, Muzaffapur contained in Memo No. 3035 dated 28.8.1996 his regularization was cancelled vide order, Annexure-3 which was challenged by Anil Kumar and others in C.W.J.C.No. 6004 of 2005 and the order terminating the service of Anil Kumar and others was set aside under orders dated 28.3.2007, Annexure-8 whereafter Anil Kumar and others were again taken back in the service of the Zila Parishad, as is evident from the order bearing Memo No. 36 dated 8.2.2008, Annexure- 9. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his case is also similar to that of the petitioners of C.W.J.C.No. 6004 of 2005 (Anil Kumar and others) disposed of under orders dated 28.3.2007, Annexure-8. 3. Let the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive officer, Zila Parishad, Muzaffarpur examine the case of the petitioner in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if he is satisfied that the case of the petitioner is similar to that of Anil Kumar and others, petitioners in C.W.J.C.No. 6004 of 2005 then similar relief be also allowed to them. 4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)