IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.365 of 2006 (M/B) Priyank Chaudhary S/o Aditya Kumar Chaudhary, R/o Village Kheda Jat, P.S. Manglaur, District Haridwar. .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. through Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Manglaur, District Haridwar. 3. Smt. Preeti W/o Priyank Chaudhary, D/o Late Bhupendra Singh, Presently R/o Village Bahadarpur Jat, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar. .......... Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2.. None for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Priyank Chaudhary seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioner before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 01.07.2006 01.07.2006 G