THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3510 of 2010 Dated: 24.12.2010 Between: Pendyala Satyanarayana ..... PETITIONER AND Sunkavalli Sivaramakrishna .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3510 of 2010 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28.06.2010 in I.A.No.357 of 2010 in O.S.No.213 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Nidadavolu. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.213 of 2008 filed for recovery of Rs.54,000/- from the respondent herein towards damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the plaintiff on account of the alleged illegal acts of the defendant. He also filed O.S.No.145 of 2008 for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to restore the pathway allegedly destroyed by the defendant. The petitioner has also filed O.S.No.139 of 2008 for permanent injunction restraining the defendant/respondent herein from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff. All the suits are pending in the same Court. Having regard to the fact that all the suits are between the same parties with regard to the same property, the petitioner filed I.A.No.357 of 2010 in O.S.No.213 of 2008 with a prayer to club all the suits and record common evidence. Though the said application was not opposed by the defendant, the Court below by order dated 28.06.2010 dismissed the same. Aggrieved by the said order, the present Revision Petition is filed. Despite notice, the respondent did not choose to appear. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I find force in the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the dismissal of the application without assigning any reasons therefor is not in accordance with law. In the circumstances, the order under revision is hereby set aside and the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to reconsider I.A.No.357 of 2010 and pass appropriate orders afresh in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Till such time, the trial in O.S.Nos.213 of 2008, 145 of 2008 and 139 of 2008 shall not be taken up. No costs. ___________ Date: 24.12.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd