BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Friday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD)No.15996 of 2011 V.RENGARAJA :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. (CR.NO.651 OF 2011) :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.VENKATESAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/A1 as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner/A1 apprehending arrest a the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under sections 157, 147, 294(b), 447, 427, 379(NP) and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.651 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, has come forward with the application under section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is a false case foisted against the petitioner based on the complaint given by the defacto complaint and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no other case pending against the petitioner. Admittedly, there is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no other case pending against the petitioner and also the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail tot he petitioner on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 09/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District. +1CC to M/S. R.VENKATESAN Advocate SR.No.42999. RP/14.12.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15996 of 2011,Date:09/12/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/