IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2011 / 13TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16984 of 2011(W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ROSHAN FAIZAL, S/O.K.J. FAIZAL, JAMAL MANZIL, KANMANI LANE, ASHOKA ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI- 682 017. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW, SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU, SRI.B.PREMNATH (E). RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM- 686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM- 686 560. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 16984 of 2011(W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE MARK LIST DATED 23/03/2011 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23/04/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE MOTHER OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER BOOK OF SUBJECT SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS 4TH SEMESTER. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 20/04/2011 FOR AN AMOUNT OF Rs.500/- TOWARDS PAYMENT OF FEE FOR REVALUATION. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 16984 OF 2011 (W) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper viz., Signals and Systems. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. Consideration of Ext.P2 application is also sought for. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner as per Ext.P3 within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. It is also directed that orders will be passed on Ext.P2 representation within four weeks. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp