( 1 ) ra28.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 28 OF 2011 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 3 OF 2011 Mukundrao s/o. Shyamrao Nannaware .. Petitioner Versus District Collector, Jalgaon & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. L.V. Sangit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. More, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE,JJ. DATED : 21.02.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking review of order dated 3rd February, 2011, passed in Public Interest Litigation No. 3 of 2011. By this order the petition was disposed of having considered the affidavit of the Collector. In the affidavit the Collector had stated that compliance of the conditions, which were objected to by the petitioner, was verified by him personally and after having satisfied in respect thereof, the auction process ( 2 ) ra28.11 was completed. In view thereof, we disposed of the Public Interest Litigation. 2. In the review petition, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the condition in respect of PAN Card and TIN number was not complied with by some of the bidders, to whom sand blocks are allotted. We have perused the covering letter dated 11.02.2011, wherein the Collector has once again reiterated the statements made on the aforementioned affidavit and has further mentioned that the bidders, to whom the sand blocks are allotted, are holding PAN Card and TIN number. In the circumstances, we find no merit in the review petition. The review petition is dismissed. [R.M. BORDE,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE,J.] snk/2011/FEB11/ra28.11