Ladda 1 wp-2621-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2621 OF 2010. Vinod Mohanlal Jain ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors ...Respondents. ...... Mr R. K. Agarwal for the Petitioner. Ms M. H. Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- 22nd February, 2011. P.C. 1. In terms of our order dated 1st February, 2011, learned A.P.P. informed us that investigation has been transferred to the State C.I.D to be conducted by the Officer of the rank of Superintendent of Police. In that sense, nothing survives for consideration insofor as prayer clause (a) is concerned. 2. Indeed, if the petitioner has any grievance regarding the manner in which further investigation/reinvestigation is proceeded by the State C.I.D, would be free to take recourse as may be permissible in law. Ladda 2 wp-2621-10 3. Insofar as prayer clause (b) is concerned, the petitioner has already made application to the Appropriate Authority for providing security to him and his family members, without charging any amount. The Appropriate Authority shall consider the said application on its own merits, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within four weeks from today and inform the outcome thereof to the petitioner within the same time. In the event, request is to be rejected, in that case, the petitioner would be free to pursue such other remedy as may be permissible in law. 4. Insofar as relief in terms of prayer clause (c) is concerned, in view of the reasons, recorded in our order dated 1st February, 2011, we have no manner of doubt that the issue will be examined by the Commissioner of Police and proceed in the matter against the concerned official, if so advised, in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Same is disposed of on the above terms. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)