IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7327 of 2009 SHYAMA KANT JHA, SON OF LATE SHRAWAN NARAYAN JHA RESIDENT OF SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR, HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. – KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT – PATNA. Versus 1. MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, GAYA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAGADH UNISERSITY, BODH GAYA. 3. THE REGISTRAR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA. 4. THE FINANCE OFFICER, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA. ----------- 2. 02.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that a sum of Rs. 50,532/- was adjusted from the gratuity amount, alleged to be taken by the petitioner as advance, vide paragraph -14 of the writ petition, has wrongly been deducted as he has not taken any advance. Learned counsel for the University, however, reiterates that petitioner had taken the advance amount and as such, the amount was rightly adjusted from the gratuity. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4. In case such representation is filed - 2 - alongwith certified copy of the present order, respondent no. 4 thoroughly verify the records and shall pass a reasoned order, supported by the relevant Xerox copy of the record evidencing the sanction of advance/adjustment amount, if any, in support of his claim, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)