"<; ;l ..^) '.'?f'."fei6-i-"" .....J-^i^--" <^ ^ t<^c"n<r.'?-1" ®sst'*~ '..?•'"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ; 2A2-/ 2QQ5 'tf f~S s-c -'"< ^ gj(j Dgsli Petitioner ^' Krishn Kumar Yadav Aged about 30 years, 0^»t^i O/^t^^-t^i 7 o1 aVc>/^'~> Ojtii.i oulicui L/cll i a.Ltci Resident of Village - Manpur, Dist : Rajnandgaon-SC.G.). Vers •o'^ Resoondents ^jF r7V> 3<<S« State of Chhattisgarh ^ /"?\^ ^' <"" 3. 4. ~1> s <••" Through The Secretary Education Departinent, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist : Raipur-{C.G.) The District Education Officpr, Dist ; Rajnandgaon-(C.G.j The Collector, Dist : Rajnandgaon-(C.G.j State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Education Department, Mantral.iya at VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Dist .: Bhopal-(M.P.) Unioa of India, Through the Principle Secretary, Department of Personal & Training & Public Grievances, Shastri Marg, New Delhi WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR WntPetition No. 1202 of 2006 Petitioner: Krishn Kumar Yadav Versus Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh & others iarile Beach; Hon'blc Mr. Justice Shri. Rakesli Anfhony, Advocate for ftxe petitioner. Siat. Anju Alinja, Depuly Govt. Advocate for fhe respondents No. 1 to3. None for fhe respondent No. 4. „ Shri S. K. Beriwal, Standuig coiinsel for the respondent No.5. ORDER ( 8th November, 2006) The following order offhe Court was passed by Satish K. Agaihotri, J. 1. Leanied counsel appearing for the petitioner subniits that the relief soiight for in this petition has been gianted by fhe respondents/State aad as such fhis petition has becoiae infructuous. Leanied cozuisel appearing for fhe respondents have no objection. 2. In view of the foregoing, tiie petition is disinissed having becouie infructuous. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge