HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (DIVISiON BENCH^ CORAM : Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Mlse. Appeal No. 1375 OF 2005 l^-- APPELLANT NON-APPLiCANT N0.3 ^ RESPONDENTS APPELLANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS National insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office - Unit - 1 Salman Road, Jammu Through: Branch Manager Nationai Insurance Co. Ltd., Durg District - Durg (C.G.) Versus 4. Renu Chauhan W/o Shri Sanjeev Chauhan Aged about 38 yrs. Authorized agent for self (appellant no.1) and appellant nos. 2 and 3 Smt. Urmila W/o Late. R.A. Singh Aged about 54 yrs. Ajay Singh @ Banti S/o Late R.A. Singh Aged about 22 yrs. AJI R/o Deepak Nagar, P.8.- Mohan Nagar, Durg, Distt. - Durg Deshraj, S/o Amarnath Aged about 43 yrs., R/o ward no. 4, Shaktinagar, Udhampur, Jammu (Jammu-Kashmir) M/s New Singh Transport Servico (Ajit Singh) 44, Transport Yard, Jammu (Jammu-Kashmir) Present: Mr. Shree Kumar Agrawat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anand Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. R.S. Patel, learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2, .) b -2.- c. v ORAL ORDER (Passed on 29tn of November 2005) The follov^ng Order of the Court was passed by S.R. Nayak,CJ: Mr. Shree Kumar Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that despite his writing tetters to the appoltant /Insurance Company, it has not produced the receipt for having paid Rs. 25000/- and it has also not responded to the letters. There is no proof to show that the appeilant / Insurance Comipany has deposited sum of Rs. 25000/- which is a conciition precedent for majntaining the appeai. In view ofthe same, we dismiss the appeal for non-compllance with the office objection and also for violation of statutory provjsions^ Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SATISHK-AGNIHO-rRI Judge y>^