IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH POUSHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 5098 of 2010() ------------------------- CC.15/2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NO.2 --------------------------------------------- C.J.GEORGE, AGED 52 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, GEOJIT BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., 5TH FLOOR, FINANCE TOWERS, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-18. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. VARKEY KUTTIYANICKAL VARKEY, AMBAT KUTIYANICKAL HOUSE, PUNNAVELI MURIAYIL, ANIKKADU-686503. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. VENUGOPAL. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.5098 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of December, 2010. ORDER Petitioner seeks a direction to the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thiruvalla to have his application for bail disposed of on the date of his surrender. 2. Petitioner is the second accused in C.C. No.15 of 2007 before the JFCM, Thiruvalla. He claims to be the Managing Director of M/s. Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited. He is accused of having committed offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 403, 420 and 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the petitioner, he was always available in the station and the police with ulterior motive police filed the final report stating that the petitioner is absconding and that persuaded the court to issue non-bailable warrant against him. Petitioner would Crl.M.C.5098/2010. 2 say that it is with ulterior motive that he was shown as absconding and that he was actually attending public functions also. The limited prayer of the petitioner at this point of time is that when he surrenders before the court concerned and moves an application for bail, the same may be considered on that day itself. There is no reason why such a prayer should not be allowed. Therefore, there will be a direction to the JFCM, Thiruvalla that in case the petitioner surrenders before the court and moves an application for bail, the same shall be considered on that day itself after issuing notice to the Public Prosecutor. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.