( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4716 OF 2008 Kishanchand s/o Damandas Chetwani and others. PETITIONERS VERSUS Amar s/o Bhagwandas Kamdar & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.D. Gunale, advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Anjali Dube-Bajpai, advocate for the respondents No. 3 to 6. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 4th January, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The interim orders rendered on applications (Exh-51 and Exh-53) by the trial Court, during pendency of suit (R.C.S. No. 461/2006) are being challenged by the petitioners. 3. It appears that the trial Court directed the petitioners to deposit amount of rent arrears. The ( 2 ) character of such amount is not of rent is the contention raised. The matter is yet not finally decided and, therefore, merely because certain amount is directed to be deposited, it cannot be said that finality is attached to the nature of such deposit. Mr. Gunale submits that interim injunction is also granted by virtue of order dated 06-07-2006, copy of which is placed on record. He submits that the trial Court may be directed to expedite the final hearing of the injunction application (Exh-5). 4. The petition against the interim orders passed below Exh-51 and Exh-53 is not worthy of consideration. Hence, the petition is dismissed. The trial Court shall, however, expeditiously decide the application for interim injunction (Exh-5) in the suit within period of two months after receipt of the writ of this Court. The petition is dismissed. No costs. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/wp4716-08 ( 3 )