IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 19th May, 2011 Order on the bail application of accused 1st Bail Application No. 300 of 2011 CRIMINAL SIDE Srimati Sarvari Begum W/o Mukhtyar R/o Village Guldiya, Thana Kashipur District Udham Singh Nagar …Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …Opposite Party Arising out of FIR No. 613 of 2010 Under Sections 302, 201 IPC P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. The First Information Report alleges that the victim had gone with Alim S/o Mukhtyar to settle some boundary wall disputes during the afternoon. When the boy did not return back, a search was made and the dead body was found in the house of Mukhtyar under the bed. The statement of the complainant under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. is more or less the same, but a supplementary statement was made indicating that Alim along with his father Mukhtyar and wife, i.e., the applicant Smt. Sarvari Begum had deliberately concealed the body under the bed with the intention to remove the evidence. Considering the aforesaid fact and without commenting anything further on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 613 of 2010, under Sections 302, 201 IPC, P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 19.05.2011 SP