IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14196 of 2011 Date of Decision: 07 December,2011 Sunder Lal .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ..Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER. Present: :-Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Maloo Chahal, DAG, Haryana. MAHESH GROVER. J. (ORAL). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as it is evident from the reply filed by the respondents to the petition, that the case of the petitioner for pension stands forwarded after considering the past services rendered by him. This satisfies his grievance. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, with the expectation that the respondents will release the necessary benefits to the petitioner preferrably within a period of four months. 7.12.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) aarti JUDGE