IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2008 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37221 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- SMT.RADHA RAGHAVAN, W/O.RAGHAVAN, THURUTHIPARAMBIL VEEDU, PALLURUTHY, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, KOCHI-6. BY ADV. SMT.P.K.SANTHAMMA RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, KOCHI TALUK OFFICE, KOCHI. 2. TALUK SURVEYOR, KOCHI TALUK, FORT KOCHI. 3. SUPERINTENDENT, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 30. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C).No.37221 of 2008 ------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner, a 72 year old lady, purchased 4 Ares and 15 Sq.L. and another 3 Ares and 12 Sq.L., as per Ext.P1 sale deed. An extent of 301 cents was thereafter sold under Ext.P2. The petitioner then sought for demarcation of her property and fixation of the boundaries. But, under Ext.P3, she has been directed to work out her remedies before the Civil Court. There seems to be a dispute regarding the boundaries separating the property which continues to be in the possession of the petitioner. In such circumstances, the stand taken in Ext.P3 cannot be considered as improper or illegal. It is open to the petitioner to move the Civil Court. Subject to the above, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge.