^\° ^ ^ 1 BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COUKT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETTTION N0.^! 62-/2006 PETITIONER A^'.. ^^^' ^^// ,^y '^y' ^" RESPONDENTS ^ ^ Shw Shankar Chouhan, aged about25 years, son of lateSant Ram resident of BUaigarh.Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralay, Dau Katyan Suigh Bhawaa,Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. The Director, School Education, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^l. ®fcw ^ s<^<<'^ \^\' , 3. Tlie State of Madhya Pradesh, through - Secretary, Department ^ff'1 of School Education, Mantralay, VaUabh Bhawan,i^^r(C.Gj) ^1 ^^.o^—j&u^^et^pfoy- J^^?- The District Education Officer, Distt. Raipia- (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLES 226 _OF _THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA POR ISSUANCE OF WMT / WRrrS, ORDER / ORDEI^, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRtATE ORDER AS THE CASE MAY BE UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES EHC—78 "3^ •<iwivf^, w^\wi<c, ?^v\wy. '^ <lWCIT(fr«11<*> sn^n^? ('jql^iy?) an^I w R-frt WTSn^T^n-Hi^ ^nwsfetsn^r SB: Kon. Mr. Justice ffritinker Diwaker 02.07.2009: Since none appears for t|1e being calied in the second rouijid, but to dismiss the petition for n| Accordingly, the petition <^i^[^1^^ iTO^f ^f ts^ <nfl^t< ^STfOT aii^i petitioner even after the case i, this Court has no other option 'pn prosecution. s dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge