IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5938 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.04.2010 Raj Bala w/o Sh. Narain Singh ...... PETITIONER VERSUS Union of India and another ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for Mr. R.D.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner contends that for the claim, which has been made in the present petition for grant of family pension/disability pension, the petitioner has already preferred a legal notice dated 06.05.2009, which has been served on the respondents (Annexure P-2) but the same has not been considered and decided by the respondents till date. He contends that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice served on the respondents within some specified time. Without going into the merits of the case nor commenting thereon, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner as made in the legal notice dated 06.05.2009 (Annexure P-2) within a period of three months' from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The decision, so taken, would be conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE April 01, 2010 pj