-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.8495 OF 2004 1. Sou.Padmavati Subhashrad Shinde, and ors. .. Petitioners Vs 1. The Phaltan Taluka Sahakari Dudh Parvatha Sangh Ltd and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Ranjitsingh R. Bhonsale, for the petitioners. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 3rd No DATE : 3rd No DATE : 3rd November,2004 ember,2004 ember,2004 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr.Bhonsale, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that he is pressing this petition only against paragraph 4 of the operative part of the order dated 12.7.2004. The said paragraph 4 reads thus: "(4) The Revisional Deputy Registrar, Co-op. Societies (Milk) Pune, is hereby directed that he may appoint a Competent Officer as per Act and Rules as well as Government Circulars for finding out about the person and rate of responsibility -2- for the financial losses found out by the Enquiry Officer." By this order, the Revisional Deputy Registrar has been directed to appoint a competent officer for holding an enquiry to fix the extent of a liability against the petitioners. Since the petitioners are entitled to be heard in the said enquiry, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned order. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed as such. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)