- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3126 OF 2004 Mr.G.S.Godbole for the Petitioner. Mr.S.A.Sawant for Respondent No.3. Mr.A.P.Vanarse, AGP for State. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 20TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: All the questions that are raised in this petition are essentially questions of fact. The document on the basis of which exception is taken to the order impugned is the "ration card". According to the Petitioner the ration card is fake a document. When the ration card was produced before the authority, no objection was raised to it. It was possible for the Petitioner to make - 2 - inquiry about the genuineness or otherwise of the ration card at that juncture. The Petitioner cannot thereafter come back and say either to the same authority or to this court that now he has discovered that the document is fake. What has been done by the impugned order is that one person has been held entitled to accommodation. I do not think that the authority has committed any error which will result in failure of justice so as to entitle this Court to interfere with the impugned order. Petition is, therefore, rejected. ...