IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16710 of 2004 Between: 1. Hameed Quadri S/o Azeemuddin Quadri R/o 21-4-820/1, Durgu Moosa Quadri Purana Pool, HYderabad 2. Syed Yousufuddin S/o Syed Anwaruddin 13-5-586/3/A, Tappachabutra, Yousuf Nagar, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Ranga Reddy District, Rajender Nagar 2 The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Rajender Nagar, R.R. District 3 The Inspector of Police, Rajender Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 4 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajender Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 5 Mohd Yousuf, R/o Alur Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 interfering in civil dispute unlawfully is illegal, high handed and unauthorised and violative of the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere in civil dispute and forcefully dispossessing the petitioner from the disputed property i.e. plot No.88 in Survey NO. 32 and 33 situated at Sogh Bowli Village, Under Attapur Village, Rajender Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.R.MOHD.IRFAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: None appeared The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: None appears for the petitioners. Heard the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 4 not to interfere in civil disputes and not to dispossess the petitioners forcibly from Plot No.88 in survey Nos.32 and 33 situated at Sogh Bowli village under Attapur village, Rajenmder Nagar Mandal, Rangareddy District. Respondent No.3 filed counter affidavit denying the allegations made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. It is stated that none of the petitioners have ever made any complaint either to the Station House Officer or to respondent Nos.1, 2and 4 alleging that respondent No.5 in collusion with one Mohd. Jaffer who is working as a police constable trespassed into the property in question and tried to dispossess the petitioners. It is also stated that the official respondents never interfered in any civil disputes. It is stated that the allegation that respondents threatened the petitioners and also told them to deliver possession immediately on 13-9-2004 is not correct. In view of the above averments in the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 26-4-2005 Svv ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Ranga Reddy District, Rajender Nagar 2 The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Rajender Nagar, R.R. District 3 The Inspector of Police, Rajender Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 4 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajender Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District 5. Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 6. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}