IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.824 of 2008 BISHWANATH THAKUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SATYA PRAKASH ------ 2 19.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the order dated 28.4.2008. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the matter relates to recall of the prosecution witness, Satya Prakash. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that witness, Satya Prakash could not be cross examined due to absence of conducting lawyer. There was Sradha in the family of the conducting lawyer as a result of which he could not appear for cross examination of witness Satya Prakash. The case is still pending for examination of other witnesses. It is further submitted that it is essential to recall the witness, Satya Prakash, for just decision of the case. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the court below is directed to recall witness, Satya Prakash, for cross examination only after examination of all other prosecution witnesses. With the aforesaid observation this application stands disposed of. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)