:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2020 OF 1988 NO. 2020 OF 1988 NO. 2020 OF 1988 Union Bank of India. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s. S.S. Associates and Ors. ... Defendants. AND AND AND SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2121 OF 1988 NO. 2121 OF 1988 NO. 2121 OF 1988 Union Bank of India. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s. Saraswati Industries and Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. Paresh J. Shah i/b. M/s. Vimadalal & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Sagar Talekar with Mr. Rodrigues for Defendants 4 & 5. Mr. Umesh G. Yerunkar for Defendant 6 and 7. Ms. Geeta M. Bhoir for Defendant 9. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 10TH 10TH 10TH NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Suit has been filed by the Union Bank of India through its Advocate have addressed a letter to the Bank but Bank has been unable to give any instructions. This fact is evident from the letter dated 15th October 2008. In the light of the fact that the Plaintiff has knowledge of the Suits, the date of hearing and the steps that are required to be taken in law for proceeding with them, the Advocate appearing for the Plaintiff - Bank stands discharged from the proceedings. None is present for the :2: Plaintiff - Bank to inform the Court as to what it proposes to do after receipt of the Advocate’s letter. 2. In such circumstances, the Suit stands dismissed for want of prosecution. A copy of the communication from the Advocate to the Bank is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Advocate states that the Bank has duly received this communication. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)