IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21389 of 2009 KAMAL NARAYAN JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that for the incident on the same day, there is case and counter case. Allegation against all the accused persons are omnibus taking which into consideration, some of accused persons have been enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Judge itself. Story of theft is doubted on the ground that in the F.I.R., it is said that he was coming for giving loan which was taken on his sister’s marriage while in his statement he said that the informant and petitioner had some quarrel which was supported by the villagers and again they committed the crime. No doubt, commission of theft can be doubted and there is case and counter case. The facts of the case apart from F.I.R. as referred has named this petitioner as assailant of Farsa blowing on the head which has been found grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may surrender and pray for regular bail. S.Ali (Mandhata Singh, J.)