IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1601 of 2008 Badruljama, Son of Shri Mahmad Mokim, resident of Naya Tola, Ganj No.1, Indira Chowk, Betiah (West Champaran)………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Betiah, West Champaran. 3. The Additional Collector, Establishment, Betiah, West Champaran. 4. The Superintendent, M.J.K. Hospital, Betiah, West Champaran. 5. The Registrar, M.J.K. Hospital, Betiah, West Champaran………………………………………….Respondents ----------- 3 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The claim of the petitioner is that he is still continuing with the respondents in the Hospital in some capacity or the other against a class IV post. In view of the earlier considerations and his empanelment, he claims that he should be regularized as a consequence of a final decision which they should take in the matter pending between the respondents. Any claim of regularisation can now be considered by any authority only in the light of the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the 2 case of Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (3) reported in 2006 (2) PLJR 363 (SC) and observations made in paragraph 44 of the said judgment. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law and take a final decision preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been paid his remuneration even for his period of working on daily wages. It goes without saying that if respondents have taken or are taking work from the petitioner, he is entitled to wages or remuneration in accordance with law. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)