@Af’CWNQ‘?O?/giy 200 (Contempt petition under Article 21 5 of the Conetitution of India read with Section 10 and 1:! of Contempt of Court Act) Single Bench: Honlble Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo 2-1 1 -200?:- Shri Devendra Patel counsdl for the petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, counse l for the respondent. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation of the petitioner has already been decided. Even, being aggrieved by the said >ther writ petition. a Therefore, the contempt i‘ ln View of this, the petition is, dismissed as having become infructuous. J decision, the petitioner is tiling an petition has become infructuous. Sd/— L.C.BHADO Judge O an?“ m (W) WWW mwm WWW. 'ifs'aW avmtrm » APPLICANT: Smt. Sadhna Pandey, W/o i PETmONER Shri O.P. Pandey, Aged about 51 years, Presently working as Public Health Tutor, Model District Hospital, Bilaspur, R/o House Member — M112 Yadunandan Nagar, Bilaspur (CG) V . -Versus— t RESPONDENT: \ Dr. Pramod Singh, Directorate CONTEMNOR ‘ of Health Services, Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)