IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11846 of 2008(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- M/S. MUKANAMCHERRIL STORES, PERUMBAVOOR, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY IT'S PARTNER P.VARGHESE, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.P.V.PAILY, PATHICKAL HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR KARA, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE IN HIS CAPACITY AS PARTNER OF THE FIRM AS WELLAS IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY. BY ADV. SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL SRI.THOMAS M.JACOB RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. NOBY MATHEW, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.MATHAI, PARVELIKUDY HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR KARA, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE. 2. M.P.MATHEW @ BABY, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.POULOSE, MUKKANAMCHERRY HOUSE, VALAYAMCHIRANGARA KARA, VENGOLA VILLAGE, PARTNER OF THE FIRM M/S.MUKKANAMCHERRIL STORES, PERUMBAVOOR. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 11846 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of April, 2008. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is preferred to direct the Court below to issue a certified copy of the order dated 24.3.2008 in I.A.168/08 in O.S.16/08 and also to pass a status quo order which has been passed by the Court in two earlier applications. The suit is one restraining the defendants from forcefully evicting the plaintiff from the petition schedule property and from creation of documents. Initially an order was granted and subsequently it was vacated. Against that order the writ petitioner wants to prefer an appeal and he has applied for the certified copy of the order which he has not yet received. Meanwhile he moved applications requesting the Court to pass an order maintaining the status quo and the Court was pleased to grant the request on two occasions but on the third occasion did not grant it and that has resulted in the filing of this writ petition. W.P.C 11846 OF 2008 -:2:- Now the Court below itself has passed an order of status quo and such order was passed only on account of the fact, the Court was not in a position to give the certified copy of the order. Even today the certified copy of the order is not granted. Therefore circumstances exists in this case to maintain the status quo order. Therefore I direct the Court below to give certified copy of the order applied for as expeditiously as possible and also direct both the parties to maintain the status quo as ordered by the Court below till 24.5.2008. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-