IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No.45334-M of 2007 Date of Decision:05.02.2008 Sanjiv Arora .....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the complainant. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. A sum of Rs.1,50,000/- has been paid to the counsel for the complainant by way of banker's cheque bearing No.101835 dated 5.2.2008, which is on account of return of advance paid by the complainant for the purchase of a new machine, which was not delivered to the complainant. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the delivery could not take place as the complainant did not pay the balance amount whereas the stand of the complainant is that Rs.1,50,000/- was paid on account of transportation, excess duty, sales tax etc., for the purpose of replacing of machine already delivered by the petitioner on account of its not being as per specification. Be that as it may. Without opining on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 14.9.2007 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. February 05, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE