^ &3 ^° IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT. PBTITION. (Ct No. ^996 /2011 PETITIONBR ^ ^•s^" ?-»-'^\K^B ^•^"T^\^ ^$^^ RBSPONDENTS "1MEHATARRAM YADAV, S/0 LATE JAGATRAM YADAV, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/0 GANDAI WARD N0. 5, TAHSIL CHHUIKHADAN, DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON, C.G VERSUS 1. ^STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH SECRETARY, URBAN ADMINISTRATION AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT, D.K.S BHAWAN RAIPUR, C.G 2. THE NAGAR PANCHAYAT GANDAI, DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON, THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER, PANCHAYAT, MUNICIPAL NAGAR GANDAI, DISTRICT C.G RAJNANDGAON. 3. POORAN SAHU, S/0 SHRI. RADHEYSHYAM SAHU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/0 VILLAGE DEVPURA, GANDAI, DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON, C.G ^ ^r 4. HEMANT VERMA, S/0 PARAETAN VERMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/0 DNF^A (CHAAR BHATA), DISTRICT DURG, C.G WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF CTDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CBRTIORAm. MANDAMUS AND OTHER SUITABLE WMT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRBCTIONS. ORDBR OR ORDERS: ^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION rc) N0.6996 OF 2011 PETITIONER Mehatarram Yadav Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnihOtri, J. Present:- Shri P. Dhurandar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 25th day of November, 2011) 1. Learned counselappearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate forum that may be available under the provisions of law, if so advised. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Gowri Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge