IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14507 of 2011 MD. MUSTKIM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.4.2011 Heard. For rejecting the prayer of the petitioner, the learned Judge, i.e., Fast Track Court No.1, Araria, who passed the order dated 28.03.2011 in Sessions Trial No. 77 of 2009, has made records of certain facts which simply appear out of the context of the case. The learned Judge has recorded that the petitioner was declared absconder by order dated 23.12.2001 whereas the F.I.R. was registered on 06.03.2008. Probably the learned Judge was reading facts of another case so as to rejecting the prayer of the petitioner in quite different a case. It is simply shocking to fine that juridical order negating a prayer is found passed on facts, which are simply out side the context and could never be accepted as truth. Let petitioner, namely, Md. Mustkin, be released on furnishing personal recognition bond of Rs. 500/- in Bhargama P.S. Case No. 27 if 2008 corresponding to S.S.T. No. 77 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No. 1), Araria as the petitioner has already been been admitted to bail by this Court as appears from statement made in paragraph 2 of the present petition. Bhardwaj/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)