r •TC- BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CGl CR.M.PNO. 8^7^ / 2011 APPLICANT : Chandrakant Upadhyay S/o Umashankar Age 48 years R/o ."ki-i^ 6/8 Shastri Nagar Contractor '^ .^" ....3^c- ^^%«- Durg(c'Q'' colony Bhilai P.S. Chawni Dist. ^ ^' -y RESPONDENT t ^ i' < VERSUS Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Corapany Ltd. Through Subhash Sing^ S/o Ramanand Singh age 53 years Assistant Engineer CSPDCL Itd. (City Division) bhilai Distribution center Power House Bhilai Dist. Durg(C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE <s 'S^ -^MM^, a'alwKo, 'fsRroqT —.....i2<:.rrr?.'^.:..'v^o..:.si:?ll! *<I*ICTI a»*ii«f»-•• • j:- 3(1^ 'T^T ( yt^q^) 3)1^1 ^lfiFIW ^raTsn^Ta^fl^ ISB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shnyastava,J I1S-12-2011 swiw tiftd siT^r Shri Ajay Thakre, counse! for Heard on admission. This petition under Section 4^ icompiaint and the cognizance take^ W commission of offence under Secl The sole submission.made b^ jtesting was done on a parttouiar dal jthough the petiiioner had appearec) Iwas done. Learned counsel for th( jwhicius based on certain reports o^ fand institution ofcriminai case is After going through the compj Imade to the effect that the meter int twas sent ror technical exami'nationl Ibasis pf report dated 14/5/10. The t? thelt ^nnexure A/4. Thesubmission rejected for the reasons stated in t|ie ^hich cannot be examined ai this s| ^ccepted in its entirety, do make out| At this stage, this Court ^eraclty of the case of the compiain^nt V!^^'~'v^ '"St'rfWFt s: ;Tfg'1 -t ne applicant. |2 CrPC has been preferred against the against the petitloner on the allegation (ion 135 ofthe Electricity Act, 2003. 1 fearned counse! ror the petitioner is that |e wlthout proper notice to the petitioner r'or testing on earlier dates, no testing ^ petitioner submits that the complaint, tampering on the basis of suchiesiing, ofthe processof iaw. )aint, it is found that averment has been yaljed on the premises ofthe petitioner land was found to be tampered on the |said report is also placed on record as the report of tampering is iiabie to be petition, is defence of the petitioner, |age. The averments in ihe compiaint, ir I ingredients of alieged ofrence. embark upon any enquiry to test the or story of defence of the petitioner. abilise infetal rlot awiEI'K ild'1] asi"IRRr> • -FS/140—2/2fll—1,50,000. 4^1 MB". S sSSSss f 1B*y WHWT »»*<)«» '3~S| "41<11M-4, yT?l+l<|t», 'f5(^ire<17 ^_,^C^^^.,^0>%^f/'».00 sn^'yrri^; (1pf3^*T) 311^'CT WI f!;'!!* TOT sn^y aiiii! yf's'.Wf.s Despit ,..;in the opinion pf this Coi|! |inteFference;»aJsj$(aMev!er.pbserveti |tal<e all such cfeferi6eifnc;ludfng one,| |appropriate st^efi iaP"Tr1e petiti^! TOItW^rffel 311^1 •?• |rt, no case is made out warrantiaq servep that it will be open for ihe Detitioner to Iwhich has been raised 'in this petition at petlti^n is accordingiy dlsmissea. St-:- ;;-»•* 'sS.'-.Sl' -.-.>... v;.. • y., :'^i.'^. ^jy-^i • K^.tl ;!:-.>•;..; '-"-- ^t '^•^.v — :^~i -^ •-. .{S-F- ""WOf;' ;.'•;,'.? -,t,f itWW's'IW 3.^ •^fttfWR •"S! Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivsstava Judge ^mrfhfliilil d^llciV, (W-IW'li.<—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000.