CWP(T) No. 15324/2008 (OA 1501/07) 19.05.2010 Present: Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General with Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General and Mr. P. M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. According to Sh. A. K. Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner, petitioner has been working as a Beldar since 1.11.1994. He is entitled to the benefits as per the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P., 1994 Supp.(2) SCC 316 as also the judgment delivered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 10220 of 2008, titled as Phool Maya versus State of H.P. & others, decided on 17.3.2010. Mr. R. K. Sharma, learned Sr. Addl. Advocate General has seriously disputed this fact. 2. Faced with this, Mr. A. K. Gupta, learned Counsel submits that interest of justice would be met if petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent/State. Mr. R. K. Sharma, learned Senior Addl. Advocate General has no objection to the same. As such petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the Government within a period of eight weeks. Any such representation made shall be considered within a period of twelve weeks. 3. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 19, 2010 (PK)