IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8110 of 2008 PUTUN MUSHAHAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02/05/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It appears that his name transpired in the alleged confessional statement of one of the co-accused. Petitioner was apprehended but nothing was recovered from his possession. It is also said that the petitioner was not identified by the informant in the T.I.Parade. It is also said that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since last more than eight months. In the circumstances, let petitioner Putun Mushahar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand0 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C.-IV, Aurangabad in Navinagar P.S.Case No.31 of 2004 (S.T.No.226 of 2007). Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)