Wrii Petition (S) No. 3935 of 2007 Vijay Shankar Puri, S/o. Shambhu Puri, Aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Giris Primary Schooi, Chandrapur, Biock Dabhra, District Janjgir- ChaiDpa (CG). RESPONDENTS Versus 1) 2) 3) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Sscreta,^', School Educatten Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District - Raipur, CG. The Director, Pubiic Instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (CG). The OisSrict Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (CG). Biock Education Officer, Biock Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa, (CG). Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution or india) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel fo.r the petitioner. Smt Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on 11th July, 2007) 6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on probation for a period of three years. Thereafter, in view of the judgment and order dated .7-11-2006 passea' Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushii Tiwart & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), the petitioner is entitied to payment of reguiar saiary from the initia! date of appointment. 7. On perusal of the appointment order (Annexure P/1), the petitioner was never appointed on probation. He was appointed for a period of two years on paymeni of fixed pay i.e., Rs.150/-, thereafter Rs.250/- and iastly he was ^ - "z raju granted a pay scate of Rs. 169-300/-. Vide order dated 1-7-1981 pay scale of the petitioner was revised to Rs.545/- - Rs. 925/-. 3. The case of Sushil Tiwari (supra) is on different facts as it is wel estabiished position of law that if a person is appointed on probation and if he compietes probation successfulfy he shouid normally be granted reguiar pay scate with effect from the date of initia! appointment. It is not the case in the present peiition. The petitioner was never appointed on probation, but the petitioner was granted different pay scales at different times. 4. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner has not raised any other point for grant of revised pay scale with effect from initiai appointment which was on a fixed pay scate of Rs.150/-. 5. As a resuit and for the foregoing reasons, there Is no merit in the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed summarily. ,—-—-_ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge