IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.34800 OF 2011 BABITA DEVI, W/O SRI RAJEEV KUMAR SAH, R/O VILLAGE MANSI, P.S MANSI, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTIY. ----------- 02/ 24.10.2011 Heard Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused for the offences punishable under Section 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner a married nanad of the deceased after her marriage was living separately in a different village and that the husband of the victim lady, the brother of the petitioner is already in jail. Considering all these aspects and especially when the petitioner is a married nanad, this Court would direct the petitioner namely Babita Devi to surrender within a period of four weeks from today and if she does so, she would be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties 2 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S case No. 94 of 2011 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished by the petitioner, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and her absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of her bail. (iii) The petitioner, in case, is now made accused in any other criminal case,that would itself lead to cancellation of her bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)