1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5192 of 2011 Decided on: 11.7.2011 Sant Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to give the work charge status in view of judgment dated 17-03-2010 passed by this Hon'ble Court in CWP (T) No. 10220 of 2008 in O.A. No. 240/2004 titled as Phool Maya Vs. State of H.P., w.e.f. due date, i.e., January, 2000 (after the completion of 10 years of regular service) ii) That the respondents may further be directed to give the all consequential benefits in the favour of 2 petitioner w.e.f. January, 2000 till the date of realization with interest @ 18% per annum.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP (T) No.10220 of 2008. Therefore, there will be a direction to the third respondent to look into the matter and in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner covered by the judgment, referred to above, similar benefits shall be extended to the petitioner herein also. The needful in this regard shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 11, 2011 (Justice V.K. Sharma) (Lsp/hl) Judge.