IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P/^o. ^^ n /2007 PETITIONER: /V..-•^ '•/Ram Bhajan Patel S/o Shri Parath y^''' ^ Ram patel> aged about 62 years •n''"X^Jy Principal, Government Higher ^.n^ 'Jy^<^ ,.•«••? ,.*' °5-* \.*' ^^°/ <?%y <:^/ RESpSNDENTS: 1/ ' ^ ^// i/y i/ o' '^ y ^ ^ -°' Ky ^" .v ^ / Secondary School, Sondka, Block Kharsia, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raigarh, (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury Accounts and Pension, ''Bt'tai^id^7" ~ ""'" ~~~ - -——-—/ Treasury Officer, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 »• Gowri HIGH COURJOF CHHAmSGARH : BiLASPUF VVRIT PETSTION i'S's N0.4911 OF 2007 PETiTIONER R^BhajanPatel ^ Vereus RcSPQNDENTS State of Chhatlisgam & Others (Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Consiifution of india) Sing'e Bench : Hon'ble Shri Saiish K. Aani'notri, J. Present:- Shri Ratan Pusiy, counsei for the petiiioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pansl Lavi'ver for the State. ORDER ('ORAU (Passed o" this 6" day of November, 2009) 1. With ihe consent of iearned counsei appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2. Ai the very outset, 'earned counsel appearing for the pstitioner submits {hat the issue involved v/ith regard to fixation of service benefiis as weti as recoverv of the amount is squareiy covered bv the decision of this Court rendered in Chinta Wlani Gupta vs. of Chhattisgarh & Others as wei! as decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Syed Abtiul Qadir anei Others vs. State of Bihar and Others . Learned counsei further submits that the petitioner may be granied iiberty lo make s represantation to the concerned authcrities to decide and consider the same in accordance with the decisions of this Court as wei! as Supreme Court in Chinta Nani Gupta (supra) and Syed Abdui Qadir (sup.-'a), respectiveiy, on its own perepecli'.'e. 3. Learned counsel aooearinH for the Stale submits thai if a representalion is made by the petitioner the same shal! be considered and decided, in accordance v»'ith ths iaw laid down in ths aforesaid decisions, as eariy as possibte preferably wlthin a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of represenSation. 4. in 'view of foregolng, according to iearned counsel appearing for the pe'iiiloner, nothing surtfives in this petilion for adjudication. 5. Accordinsiv, the writ petition is dlsposed of. _..-.-- Sd/- .., ^; ^gn3ioKl Saosb^^- ; 2008 (iiij MPJR-CG31 - (2009) 3 SCC 475