IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11991 of 2010 1. RUKMINI DEVI, WIFE OF NARAYAN SAH 2. RAJESH SAH 3. CHANDAN SAH BOTH SONS OF NARAYAN SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. asserted that she was not kidnapped and had married Gulshan Sah on her own sweet will and wanted to live with her inlaws, let the petitioners above named, who are mother and brothers of the said Gulshan Sah respectively, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Madhepura, in Sessions Trial No. 149 of 2009 arising out of Murliganj P.S. Case No. 125 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, - 2 - their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)