#49 21.02.2011 Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.Sumant De, Advocate. ) Ms.5antosh Kohli, APP for the State/respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2 in person with Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate. +Crl.M.A. 2043/2011 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. erl.M.C. 531/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.c. seeking quashing of FIR No. 428/2007 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Sarita Vihar on the complaint of the respondent NO.2. Ground for seeking quashing is that the parties have amicably settled the matter and now, there. is no dispute left. Petitioners are present. They are identified by their counsel Sh. Sumant De, Advocate. Respondent No.2 is also present. She is identified by her counsel Sh. Prashant Mendiratta, Advocate. It is submitted by the parties that the FIR was the result of matrimonial discord, which has been amicably resolved and parties have taken consent divorce. Now, there is no dispute left between the parties, therefore, there is no purpose in keeping the FIR alive or prosecuting the petitioners. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into settlement with the petitioners of her own accord without any inducement or threat from any corner. She submits that as per the settlement, petitioners were to ----....!.. ;-r "--.........!. Signing Date:14.08.2024 17:11:15 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified z _ pay to her a sum of 33 lakhs in full and final settlement of her claim of 'Streedhan' and maintenance-past and future. She further submits that the divorce decree has already been passed and the marriage is dissolved and she has already received a sum of 23 lakhs out of the settlement amount and 10 lakhs is received today vide Demand Draft No. 145162 dated 14.02.2011 for 10 lakhs issued by the 'Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited' in her favour. Respondent No.2 states that now, there is no dispute left between her and the petitioners, therefore, she does not want any action against the petitioners on her FIR and that, she has no objection to the quashing of FIR. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State submits that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Since the parties have amicably settled their matter in dispute and now, there is no dispute left, I am of the view that no useful purpose shall be served by prosecuting the petitioners. Accordingly, FIR No. 428/2007 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Sarita Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition stands disposed of. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE FEBRUARY 21, 2011/akb :J ------'<