IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55350 of 2007 SHAHEEN QUAISER, AGE 47 YEARS, SON OF WASHI AHMAD QUAISER, RESIDENT OF FLAT NO.104, NASHEMAN APARTMENT, SALIMPUR AHRA, P.S. GANDHI MAIDAN, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAYEED IMAM AHMAD SON OF WASI AHMAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SAMANPURA,P.S. SHASHTRI NAGAR, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 4. 27.10.2010. On 27.9.2010, on the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the case was adjourned and it was directed to list this case after Puja Vacation. Thereafter, regularly, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today, it was informed by Shri L.N. Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that he has got no instruction from his client and as such he is not in a position to press this petition. I have heard Shri A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. The sole petitioner, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has prayed for quashing of an order dated 2 N.H./ 18.1.2007 passed by Shri Shashi Bhusan Neeraj, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna. By the said order, learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 341 and 323 of the Indian Penal code after perusing the charge sheet as well as case diary. I have perused the materials available on record particularly the impugned order. The court is of the opinion that while taking cognizance, learned Magistrate has committed no error. The petition stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)