IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / Writ Petition No. 31S! /2003 ' r PETITIONER ’ : Subhash Kar, aged 47 Years, S / o Late Krantikeshwar, Gram Sahayak (Secretary) Janpad Panchaya‘t Saraipali, Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS :1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Rural 85 Panchayat,D.K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Deputy Director, Panchayat 85 Social Welfare Deptt; Mahasamund (C. G.) 3 . Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Saraipali Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) RIT PETITION U/A 22g/2{; OF THE CONSTITU- ‘TION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. 4 l. PAREEICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As stated above in the cause title. @/ W .‘LJ._.£L.J Z Wu:- mmwvwvgak mg m Shri L.C. Dos, counsel for The‘ pe'ri'l'ioner. Miss Shormilo Singhai, Deputy 60w. Advocate for 'rhe Sfofa/ respondem's’ Heard bofh The counsel. By fhis wri‘l' India, By fine pe‘fi'l'ioner pe'H‘Hon has under cholknl; icle The 226/227 order of do'l'ed +he Consfifufion 19.09.2003. by of which The pefitioner hos been BoToulT, tron erred To Jonpod PonchoyoT, DisTT. Surgujo. 2 The peTiTioner is working os 6mm Sohoyok. The peTiTioner’s case is ThuT The peTiTioner was posTed, in Roipur DisTricT up To December, 1998. In The monTh J of December, 1998, The peTiTioher was Transferred To ifribol DevelopinenT Area, NorTh BosTor, Konker. On 23" June, 2003, ’ is The sTili peTiTioner working was and Transferred hos noT been To Liieved, L onpod PonchoyoT, buT by The Soroipoii, impugned Where order he wiThin o period of Three monThs, The peTiTioner has again been Transferred from Somipoii To Janpdd PanchoyoT, BoTouli, DisTT. Suroujo. g i The _ieorned counsel for The peTiTioner submiTs ThaT The presenT place of posTing is 400 Kms. away ram his home Town (Saraipali). The peTiTioner is o low paid employee d The Transfer is arbiTrary. Since The peTiTioner has been Transfer d wiThin a period of Three monThs, Therefore, The learned counseLsu miTs ThaT The responderlsdm’ay‘beii E l é it direcfed 1‘0 consider 'rhe represem afion of +he pefi'rioner looking +0 the difficuities of the petitioner being a low paid employee. The iearned counsel for #he petitioner furihei alr-endy been submi‘Hed by ‘Hqe 26.09.2003. Having heal-d the learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is mgain f0 respondent No.1 within ten auowed 1’0 make a representation days from today raising all his gri vanoes and in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the representation wthin thirty days from the date of receipt of the representation, in ' submi‘rs fhaf a representation has pe‘ri‘rioner 1'0 responden'f No.1 on decided. objective manner with o reasoned order considering all the grievance of the petitioner. If the petitioner is riot relieved, he should not be relieved, till the representation is With the above observations and directions the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.28'/9/2003 and I.A.No.9293/2003 also stand disposed of. Soma Sdl- /) - ”7’1 in L_C.BHADOO Judge t/ ‘ 4‘ [thoW Parties are entitled for certified copy of this order.