IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5878 of 2009 RAM JEEWAN RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 12/05/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to have been appointed as a Panchayat Teacher on 30.11.2006 based on his qualification from the Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad. He has been terminated on 15.7.2007 on the ground that the qualification from the aforesaid institution was not acceptable for appointment. The limited submission from an order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No.10748/08 disposed on 7.4.2009 is that the policy decision of the State Government on the issue of equivalence of the aforesaid qualification and its not being acceptable to the State Government has been taken only on 20.11.2008 and it is, therefore, necessarily prospective in its operation. Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the correctness of the position that the claim of the petitioner is now required to be considered in light of the decision in C.W.J.C. No.10748/08 and if he is similarly situated on facts, he is entitled to be accorded similar treatment. 2 If the respondents propose to differentiate the case of the petitioner they are required to grant him a personal hearing and then pass a reasoned and speaking order setting out the grounds of difference to facilitate judicial review by this Court, should the occasion arise. The writ application is allowed. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)