IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24069 of 2011(G) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. SHIBIN M. PAULOSE, S/O.M.M.PAULOSE, AGED 22 YEARS, MELETHU HOUSE, CHALAMPADOM, KOOTTALA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SREEJITH.C.K., CHETTUPUZHA HOUSE, AKKARAPPURAM, KURICHIKKARA P.O., THIRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. ANOOP.O., PUTHUKULANGARA HOUSE, AKATHIYOOR P.O., KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. VISHNU C.K., SOUPARNIKA, MARAVANCHERRY LANE, PUNKUNNAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. AFSAL.P.M., PUTHENVEETTIL , CHALIPADAM, WADAKKANCHERRY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. ARUN ASHOK, KAIPPAPLACKAL HOUSE, MURIYAD P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. VISHNU.A.R., AKAMPADATH HOUSE, KONDAZHI P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT V-2, BLOCK-1, CAPITAL VILLAGE, PUNKUNNAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 8. VIJITHA.K., KUNDANATTU HOUSE, P.O,ERAVU, ARIMPUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 9. FINCY FRANCIS, THATTIL UMBAVOO HOUSE, PERUVANKUANGARA ROAD, P.O,OLLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 10. JINU.C.V., CHENANANGAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERINGANDOOR P.O., M.G.KAVU, THRISSUR DISTRICT. W.P.(C).NO.24069/2011-G: 11. SURAJ.M.PANAKKAL, PANAKKAL HOUSE, A K G ROAD, THEKKEPPURAM, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISUR DISTRICT. 12. PRASANTH.P., PALLIPATT HOUSE, VALAPAD P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 13. ANEESH CHANDRAN, KUNNISSERY HOUSE, PALLIKKARA, NANNAMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 14. SAMBHU.R. OIL PALM INDIA LIMITED, YEROOR ESTATE, BHARATHIPURAM P.O., KOLLAM. 15. GREESHMA.M.G., MUTHUVARA HOUSE, PUZHAKKAL P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 16. MIDHUN ANAND.M., MECHEIYIL HOUSE, MUTHUVARA, PUZHAKKAL P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN-673 635. R1 & R2 BY SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.24069/2011-G: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.1. DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.2. DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.3. DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.4. DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.5. DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.6 DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.7 DTD. 25/08/2011. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.8 DTD. 26/08/2011. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.9 DTD. 26/08/2011. EXT.P.10: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.10 DTD. 26/08/2011. EXT.P.11: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.11. DTD. 23/08/2011. EXT.P.12: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.12. DTD 29/08/2011. EXT.P.13: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.13. DTD. 29/08/2011. EXT.P.14: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.14. DTD. 29/08/2011. EXT.P.15: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.15. DTD. 26/08/2011. EXT.P.16: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE P.16 DTD. 29/08/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 24069 OF 2011 - G ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners were the students in B.Tech Electronics and Communication Engineering Degree Course. They appeared for their 8th Semester regular examination. When the result was published, they failed in the paper - EC 04 801 (Micro Electronic Technology). They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 10 weeks on production of a copy of this judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rka