IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8691 of 2009 Smt.Urmila Devi, wife of Sri Shukhdeo Prasad Sinha, resident of villatge- Lohra, P.O. Lohra, P.S. Harnaut, District- Nalanda, at present working as Assistant Teacher at Middle School Mohaddi Nagar, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda and residing at Mohalla- Professors Colony, western Garphpar, Biharsharif. …… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Director of Education, New Secretariat, Patna 3.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna 4.The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif 5.The District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda at Biharsharif 6.The Area Education Officer, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda 7.the Drawing Dispersing Officedr-cum- Headmaster, Middle School, Sathopur Block, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda. 8.The Headmaster of Mohaddi Nagar Middle School, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda. ….. Respondents ----------- 2. 30/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has filed this writ application for payment of amount of her salary as well as difference of salary, D.A., bonus etc. of various periods to the tune of Rs.1,18,348/-. From the records it appears that several representations have been filed by the petitioner and at one stage the District - 2 - Superintendent of Education had issued an office order for payment of salary of the petitioner from March, 2001 onwards vide Annexure-10. From the last representation filed by the petitioner dated 11.4.2005, annexed as Annexure-15, it appears that the petitioner has mentioned therein all the details of her dues. There is nothing on the record to show that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of by the respondent District Superintendent of Education. In the circumstances, the District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda at Biharsharif is directed to consider the said representation of the petitioner and pass specific orders in respect of each and every claim of the petitioner as raised in the said representation. After considering the representation, if the District Superintendent of Education finds the petitioner entitled for all the amounts claimed in the representation or in respect of specific heads, he shall issue specific order to the Headmaster for payment of the same to the petitioner within specified period and shall also see to it that the amounts - 3 - are actually paid to the petitioner. In case, Headmaster does not comply with his order, the District Superintendent of Education will be at liberty to take action against the Headmaster including stopping of salary of the Headmaster for non-compliance of his orders. In any case, respondent District Superintendent of Education shall ensure that all legitimate dues of the petitioner are paid to her within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With regard to the claims of the petitioner which are not found admissible by the District superintendent of Education, shall assign specific reasons for the same and communicate the same to the petitioner within that very period. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)