IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10254 of 2008 ARUN MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13.05.2008 Heard on the bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner Arun Mahto, who stands implicated in Ghoswari P.S. Case No. 31 of 2004 registered under Sections 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2007. It has been submitted that he is not named in the FIR, but his complicity transpired in the statement of the informant recorded in Para 19 of the case diary, which is relevant from the statement of witnesses recorded in paras 71 and 72 of the case diary. The clue of the involvement of the petitioner transpired from the police spy as stated in Para 68 of the case diary. The motorcycle in question is said to have been lifted by this petitioner. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after another six months, in case the trial is not concluded within that period. SKBOSE/Sanjeet (Subash Chandra Jha)