The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.5072 of 2010 Dated 1st April, 2010 Between: 1.Thota Rama Krishnaiah and 4 others …Petitioners And 1.The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Gachibowli, Hyderabad and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr.B.Prakasam Counsel for the Respondents: AGP of Home The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3, in not investigating the crime registered as FIR.No.323 of 2009 under Section 174 Cr.P.C., in accordance with law, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners also sought for a direction to respondent No.1 to cause an enquiry held in the conduct of respondent No.3. I have heard Sri B.Prakasam, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are parents and Petitioner Nos.3 to 5 are sisters of one Thota Laxmi Satya Venkata Rama Rao. He along with his wife and a child were found dead in their flat on 01-10-2009. According to the petitioners, they have died by committing suicide by hanging. The petitioners alleged that on a report lodged by one of their distant relatives, Crime No.323 of 2009 was registered under Section 174 Cr.P.C. The petitioners alleged that the keys of the flat taken by the Police have not been handed over to them though four months have elapsed. They also alleged that the Tahsildar and respondent No.3 connived with third parties and respondent No.3 has been continuously making phone calls to the petitioners threatening them with dire consequences unless they settle the disputes with the parents of their deceased daughter-in-law. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, the fact of death of the above-mentioned three persons has been admitted. It is further stated that during the course of investigation, it was found that the death of the son and daughter-in-law of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 was caused due to asphyxia as a result of strangulation by soft material and that the son of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 strangulated his son viz., Thota Ram Nitish and later committed suicide. Respondent No.3 further stated that as no one was held responsible for the death of the three persons, their case was referred as action abated and that accordingly, final report was filed before the Court of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Cyberabad, on 14-12-2009. Respondent No.3 denied the allegations of the petitioners that he harassed them by threatening them to compromise with third parties. It is further stated that the Writ Petition is filed on mere apprehension. At the hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the keys of the flat have been handed over to the petitioners in pursuance of an order passed by this Court in another Writ Petition filed by the petitioners and that they are in possession of the property. As regards the alleged harassment, respondent No.3 specifically denied the allegations made by the petitioners and in the absence of any evidence adduced by the petitioners in support thereof, it is not possible for this Court to give findings on these allegations. The averment of respondent No.3 in this regard is placed on record. In view of the statement made by respondent No.3 that a final report is filed referring the case as action abated, and the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have not felt aggrieved by such a report, no further orders need be passed in this regard. Subject to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel of disposal of the Writ Petition, no specific orders need be passed in WPMP.No.8242 of 2010. WPMP.No.6543 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 1st April, 2010 lur