(F‘ \ok_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT B‘ILASPUR [C.G.-1 Writ Petition No.---3-U-8---_- [04 ' ETITIONER P Manoj Naik S/o Late Naraii’lgh Lal Naik, Aged— About 24' Years, R/o North Avenue,A/9, Rajeev nagar, Raipur [C.G.]. VERSUS ESPONDENTS : 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through— Secretary Public Works Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) r 2 Chlef Engmeer Pubhc Works Department Ralpur [C G ] 3. Executive Engineer Public Works Departmen Division no. 2, Raipur [C.G.] ’4. Union Of ‘India Through- Director, Personnel training, Pubiic grievances 85 Pension ($tate Reorganisation Cell) Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 .OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; f R t IW XI—HC—ZZ I Wm WmW.P.3UgH man-r . W , WWW WWEwW W 30.3.2005 Shri Dhaniram Patel‘ counselfor the petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, Govsnlment Advocate ror tbs State] raspondents No. 1, 2: 86 3. On the earlier occas30ns, this Court had passed orders in relation to admission of the petition. Reply etc. was also to be tiled, but the same has no: been nleti till today. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s father t was working in the respondent department as a Sub—Engineer, who died on 9.10.2002 during the course of his employment. ‘Thereafter, the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment but his application has not been considered so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application has been filed in the office of Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., Raipur. A copy of the application has also been annexed with this petition. Since the death has taken place after coming into force of MP. Reorganization Act, 2000, therefore, the Central Government is aiunnecessaxy party in this case. None for respondent No.4 (Union of India). Presently, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities may be directed to decide the case of compassionate appointment of the petitioner Within the stipulated period: grant‘ed by this Court on a representation, being filed before them. En, / f XI-HC—22 HW,WW,W m W mm.w.f...3l2§ in 2004 W mmmm g), . r WW§WW QEWaném This limited prayer made by learxmd counsel for the §etitioner is not opposed by the State cotmsel. The same is allowed. It is hereby directed. that the petitioner shall tile a representation along with copy of this writ petition and also with a copy of this order within a period of 15 days from today before the Superintending Engineer concelned and if such a representation is hled, the Superintending Engineer shall consider the case of the petitioner and decide his representation by a reasored. order as early as possible, preferably Within a period of 6 weeks from the. date of filing] receipt of the said representation. The petition stands finally disposed of at this stage. > Certified copy as per rLles. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- i (@W) .