IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 28052 of 2005 Between: Kanuri Bhasava Purna Devi, W/o.Late K.Bhojaraju, H.No.1-2/3, P & T Colony, Back side of Raja Theater, Rajahmundry, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner of Endowments, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. 2 Govt of A.P., Rep by its Secretary, Department of Revenue (Endowments), Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appopriate writ calling for the records relating to O.A.No.8751 of 2005 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal and consequentially in releasing the terminal benefits and the deceased husband of the applicant and not sanctioning the family pension, to the applicant as illegal, void and agaisnt to the Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to pay the Family pension to the applicant and other terminal benefits and the deceased husband of the applicant such as Gratuity, P.F.Leave Salary and the suspension allowances etc. to the applicant by duly fixing the pay of the deceased husband by applying the P.R.Cs and pass such other or further order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.GURU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.28052 of 2005 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) We are not inclined to entertain the writ petition inasmuch as the record shows that there is no final decision rendered by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.8751 of 2005. In the absence of any final decision by the Tribunal in the said O.A., we are not inclined to interfere at this stage. It is for the Tribunal to dispose of O.A. expeditiously, if not already disposed of. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 10-07-2008 bsc