^^^^^ .^e. "^ ^^ '%, ^l i ^ ^A... '^^/ ";^€L..^^1^ ^^ '^' T^T ^iNid^r, ^Ti1^ji<o, [^^i<ri^< 2^ /^~ "^ 200 3ii^r ^r'^ite ^IT ^JT^T '^lte 'r^iw^fe^?^' fSinale Bench; l-jon'ble Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P. Fsl rilo.5766/2008 (Petition U/A 226/22f of Constitution of India) PETmONER Urria Vs RESPONDENTS Smt. Kumar, Assistanl Engineer, E/M, LM R/o: Mill, Gali 1. Shrivastava, W/o Shri Suresh a^ed about 46 years, employed as Grade-III, O/o Executive Water Resources Department, TW <& Gate bivision No.l, Raipur, Behihd Telibandha School, Shweta Floor |SJo.3, Raipur Statel Secrel D.K.S.I (C6)] 1 2. The Raipui 3. The Wate (^) 4. The well Present: Mr. B.P. Rao, Advocate for the pet| Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L. for the State| ^Frf^ft^ 'RT^ff ^ feT^> <M^i< '^3tf^H3:11^T of Chhattisgarh, through : the ary, Water Resources bepartment, Bhawan, Mantralaya,Raipur 491002 ^n9ineer-in-Chief, Water Resources bepar|tment Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, ((CG) CJhief Engineer (Mahanadi Pariyojna), Resources Department, Raipur :xecutive Engineer, E/M, LM, Tub o|nd Gate, Division, Water Resources Deparjtment, Raipur (CO) tioner. ^^nT?^-^T^J||^, O^I^I^IH —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. ~3~^T'^TrqM'sr, ^Ti1^4i<o, [^<rii^^< "^ 200 ~^r?^?T ^ra^ (^i^^?) ^r 'cmi^ii^^iw |NiN|gg^ '-^'^ -^ -I 17.10.2008 With the consent of learnedl heard finally. Learned counsel for thepetil petitioner may be given an opporl before the competent authority, respondents has no objection. Having considered and withou the case, in the opinion of this Cour1 is granted to the petitioner to ma| grievances before the competent copy of thispetition and order, withji on such representation being fil respondents may decide the same onj early as possible, preferably within of receipt of the representation. The petition is disposed of ac| Certified copy as per rules. '^Tqf^^f 'RF^ff ^ fe^ ^f^gK ^>^rRp?3:??^i counsel for the parties, the petition is |ioner submits that for the present the t^unity of filing detailed representation to which learned counsel for the expressing any opinion on the merits of 1, ends of justice will be served if liberty |<e a detailed representation raising his a4thority of the respondents along with a in a period of one month from today and Ijsd, the competent authority of the its own merit, in accordance with law, as [a period of three months from the date ordingly. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ?1W:^7T ^-^ -FS/197—3/2008—40,000.