fyw £. a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 . No. 1 of2009 PETITIONER : Smt. Padma Yadav W/o Shri Aghori Yadav, Aged about 40 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kauwatal, Resident of Village Khudubhatha- Tahsil Sarangarh- District : Raigarh (C.G.) . \rERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. 8.D.O (Revenue) Tahsil : Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Chandra Prakash Kurre Up Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kauwatal. 4. Sammeram S/o Kaliram KmTe, Panch Ward No.11. 5. Smt Lila Bai W/b Laharram asiant Panch WardNo. 13 6. Smt. Santoshi W/o Dauram Lahare Pasich WardNo.14. 7. Sliri Gopichand Lahare S/o Awadhram Panch WardNo.9. 8. Mohit Ram Lahai'e S/o Pukram Panch Ward No.10. 3 to 8 resident of village Khudubhatha Tahsil Sarangarh District Raigarh (C.G.) 9. Basant Tiwari S/o Suresh Prasad Tivvari, PanchWardNo. 1. 10. Amrit Lal Banjare S/o Dalganjan Panch Ward No.5. ll.Sint. Saraswati Tiwari W/o Kamna Sagar PanchWardNo.3. 12. Shri Ramdhan S/o Ramesh Lal Chouhan Panch Ward No. 6. ^^' -.^- 13. Shri Pardesh Banjare S/o Dhani Ram Panch WardNo.6. 14. Surendra Tiwari S/o Bhagwat Panch Ward No. 2. 15. Shi'i Chini Lal Routiya S/o Loopram Panch WardNo. 8. 16. Smt. Kamla Bai W/o Nasiha Charan Banjare Paneh Ward No. 7. 9 to 16 resident of viilage Kauwatal Tahsii Sarangarh District Raigarh (C.G.) WRrT^ETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SBLHon'MeShriSatishK.Agmhotri,,?. Present: Shri Anil Kumar Pandey, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sliri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel L'awyer for the State/respoiident No. 1 and 2. ORALORDER (Passed on 06th day of January, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstiTictions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter o$i merits at this stage and seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise objection before the appropriate authority, as may be permissible under the provisions oflaw. It is ordered. 2. 3. Accordmgly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforestated. 4. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, for ad-mterim relief, also stands dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit