- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2668 OF 2009 Ganesh Dattatraya Nagpure ... Applicant vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Rahul S.Kate for Applicant Mr.H.J.Dedhia APP for Respondent. CORAM: A.S.OKA, J DATED: 30th June, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. Affidavit of the concerned Police officer is taken on record. The explanation contained therein is accepted. 2. This application for bail has been placed before this court as the regular court is unable to take this application. The applicant is accused no.3 who was arrested on 27.11.2006 by the Indapur police station on connection with offences under sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B, 20-1, 109, 504, 506 of IPC and certain offences under the Arms Act. The application made by the applicant before the Sessions court has been rejected and therefore this bail application in this court. - 2 - 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant has invited my attention to order dated 31.1.2007 passed in Criminal Application No.432 and 424 of 2007 passed by the Sessions Court in favour of the co-accused as well as an order passed by this court in favour of co-accused. The present application is filed claiming bail on the ground of parity. 4. After having considered the submissions and after perusing the orders on which reliance has been placed, I find that there is no case made out to grant bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has been named in the FIR and statements of the prosecution witnesses show complicity of the applicant in the offence. Hence there is no case made out for grant of bail. Application is rejected. { A.S.Oka, J } - 3 - - 4 - - 5 -