o' rA^ (^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDI_CAZURE_C^HATTISGARH,AT BILASPUR W.P.NQ, 2-^^6'/2004 Pettttogier Kaml Kumar Som S/o Late Ktotii La! Soni, Aged about 29 years, R/o Sonarpara, Ratanpur, Dist : Bilaspur- (C.G.5 R^po^degit^ Ver^ss c^ ^. J,<^ , State of Chhattisgarh Through the .c\\(;^'*'CS^'> secretary' Central Education &.?*Q^S^ Departaient, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur, ......^x':- ^'j'^y""' y'ki^^'-^ ^^ 2. The Director Public fastmction, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur-(C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, Bi!aspur-(C.G.) 4. Tfae Umon of&idia Through Secretary Ministiy ofPersomie} aed Public Grievances, New Delhi WR1TPETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 2.2.6 / 2.2.7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^!^5Tr3'^^—— ^ b.fc( '\ /..y^^^' '^y ^ ^;,.° State-of K»p,, ThrGta@h s Th@ s®e£^taEy».-s;ehaolg^ue'ateicm T)epa2?tBB9at» •••Vsl:iaS?h 8fcawim» BfcapaXfr M«dh^& yraasaah, ^ ^ ^<cJ -'{'l^^v '^ '" v^'^ '^^ v v .V '^ .i^' ^ .'^^ ^ ^.c' -^y .^v XI-HC-22 W^^I^T' h^ ^Ti^i 5hHirt-. ^f^T ll^ ^-S[ -^[y^T^[. '^xft^FT^. t^T-Hy Sff^T ^(^^ ^.f.^o. ^6^G,/0^ '^ 200 ^PT^T ^RT^ 'I^^T' 3TT^T'^TTW ^fN 21-12-2005 Petitioner by &t7H:i V^^^ ^^ Shri Vivek Sharma, Panet Lawyerj Heard. This case relates to compassion^te emptoyee sen/ing in the State. Learned counsel for the petitionei} the employee has occurred on or after 1 -fl in.batch ofcases bearingW.P. No.1322/$C passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He'j also. Learned counsel for the State doe{ of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision employees who died on or after 1/11/19^7 that time. In view of the submissions without expressing any opinion on the justice wlll be served if a direction is concerned to consider and decide the prevatent at the time of death of the emjplc appointment orders will be issued as eajr petitioner is also directed to render due ct any gnevance stilt remains, the petitioner including filing ofthe petition before this With the aforesaid obsen/ations, Certified copy as per rules. giv^n Copy to the State counsel, who| respondents for comptiance. ?T7fPf ^T^i ^ fecTf -^RT^ ^ ^TRlTT 3TT^T J^\^i Advocate. for the'State. appointment consequent upon the death of an categoricalty stated that in this case, the death of -H 1-1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that )002 involving the same question orders have been l^rays that similar orders may be passed in this case ^ not dispute the above fact and state that the State to consider the cases of dependants of those strictly in accordance with the policy prevalent at mac^e by learned counsel appearing for the parties, m^rits of the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities of the petitioner in accordance with the policy em|ployee concemed. tf the petitioner found eligible, rly as possible on or before 30th April, 2006. The ^-operation to the authonties. tt is made clear that if may avait the remedy available under the law (pourt. petition stands disposed of. cjase this will be obliged to communicate the order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Hlc5 <?Hi7T ^"