IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLCIATION NO.567/2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.228/2010 CHHUGARAM LAHORIMAL KHATRI ..VS.. SMT. TARABAI SUKHADEORAO DIKEY & ORS =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK,J. DATED : 16th June, 2010. Shri De, the learned advocate appears on behalf of the appellant. None appears on behalf of the non applicants no.2 to 4, though served. The non applicants have also not filed any reply to the civil application. It is categorically stated in the civil application, that it is learnt that the respondents no.3 & 4 are trying to alienate the suit property and transfer the suit property so as to frustrate the rights of the applicant. Since the statement of fact made in the civil application is not controverted by the respondents, it is necessary to grant temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating or creating third party interest in the suit property during the pendency of the first appeal. The respondents are therefore, restrained from alienating or creating any third party interest in the suit property pending disposal of this appeal. Civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE SMP