IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7255 of 2010() ----------------------------- CMP.3727/2010 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT II, THAMARASSERY .................... (CRIME NO.3727/2010 OF KODENCHERRY POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT) .................. PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 3,4 AND 6: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. GEORGE PAUL, SON OF PAUL, PAINADATHU VEEDU, KODENCHERRY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. PRASAD.K.P., SON OF PARAMESWARAN, KOOTTANAPALLY VEEDU, KODENCHERRY AMSOM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. RAJESH, SON OF BALAN, THOPPIL THEKKETHIL VEEDU, KODENCHERRY AMSOM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM, SMT.KOCHUMOL KODUVATH. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODENCHERRY, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.7255 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of November, 2010 ORDER The petitioners, who are accused Nos.3, 4 & 6 in Crime No.315 of 2010 of Kodencherry Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324 & 326 read with Section 149 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 01/11/2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter alia that altogether three persons were injured in the occurrence and one of them sustained fracture of left parietal bone. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will Bail Appln.No.7255/2010 : 2 : definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj