ysss^-^ r " ^ -1- s^ (.-^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MLSCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASE N0^. OF 2010 Applicants ^•t'. ...-••^^v ^-^•-^T^ ^"'^^.-y >-••" ^ ^Power Grid Corporation India Ltd. A Govt. Of India Enterprises Sampritinagar Uppelwadi, Nagpur Through Managing Director. its Non-Applicant ^J. versus State of M.P. through Secretary Revenue Department Wallabh Bhawan Bhopal Now State Of C.G. <^2. The Collector Durg. 3. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Land Acquisition Officer Durg M.P. ^4. District Registrar (Registration Department) Durg, District Durg C.G. APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ANDiSKJDANATION OF DILAY IN DEPOSIT IN COMPLIANCE OF ORDER DATED 14?T2.2009 IN MCC No. 387/2008^ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'H'ISGARH AT BILA8PUR APPLICANTS NON-APPLICANTS M.C.C. No. 76 of2010 Power Grid Corporation India Ltd. VERSUS State ofM.P. & Others. \b APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND CONDONAnON OF DELAY IN DEPOSFT IN COMPLIANCE OF ORDER DATED 14.12.2009 IN M.C.C. N0.387/2008. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate for the petitionei'. 8M P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. OR»ER(ORAL) (Passed on 29th day of March, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 14.12.2009 passed in M.C.C. No. 387/2008, whereby the writ petition No. 2235/2000 was ordered to be restored, subject to payment ofa cost ofRs. 1000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Coimnittee, withiii a period oftwo weeks. However, inadvertently, fhe cost could not be deposited within the stipulated period. Thus, further time may be granted to deposit the cost. 2. Accordingly, further three days time trom today is granted to the applicant to deposit the cost, as aforestated. 3. Consequently, this application is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Anut