: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.378 OF 2003 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.378 OF 2003 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.378 OF 2003 IN IN IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3264 OF 2002 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3264 OF 2002 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3264 OF 2002 IN IN IN LONG CAUSE SUIT NO.4814 OF 2002 LONG CAUSE SUIT NO.4814 OF 2002 LONG CAUSE SUIT NO.4814 OF 2002 Everest Media Pvt. Ltd. ).. Appellants Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater ) Bombay and another ).. Respondents Mr.D.J.Khanapurkar i/b.M/s.Prakash & Co. for the Appellants. Mr.J.Xavier for Respondent No.1. Mrs.G.P.Mulekar, A.G.P., for Respondent No.2. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 1ST NOVEMBER 2004 DATED: 1ST NOVEMBER 2004 DATED: 1ST NOVEMBER 2004 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Appeal From Order has been filed against the order dated 22nd November 2002 whereby the Motion has been dismissed. At the time of admission, interim relief was granted to the effect that there was to be temporary injunction against Respondent No.1 from removing 32 pedestals of the Appellants already installed at various traffic junctions. The grievance of the Appellants seem to be that the Corporation had reached the conclusion for revoking the permission for illuminating these pedestals meant for the traffic police, without following the : 2 : guidelines issued by the Corporation. In my view, it would be appropriate to dispose of the the Appeal From Order and to continue the interim relief already granted till the disposal of the Suit. 2. The interim relief granted by the order dated 13th January 2003 shall continue pending the hearing of the Suit. Hearing of the Suit expedited. The trial Court is requested to dispose of the Suit expeditiously. 3. Appeal From Order disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. 4. In view of the disposal of the Appeal From Order, nothing survives in Civil Application No.121 of 2003 and the same is disposed of accordingly.