- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6622 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6622 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6622 OF 2005 Bunty @ Dhiraj Laxman Salunke ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 17,2005 : OCTOBER 17,2005 : OCTOBER 17,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. This application for bail is filed for the offence punishable under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 37(1) read with Section 135 and Section 142 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. 2. There is a prima facie evidence available against the Applicant of recovery. Moreover, the Applicant was arrested on the same day on which the offence has taken place. In fact on that day the Applicant could not have entered the area as order of externment was operating against him. There is enough material on record to show complicity of the Applicant at this stage. There is no reason to take a different view from the one which is taken by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. Application is, therefore, rejected. It is stated that the age of the Applicant is 22 years. Hence, trial will be concluded expeditiously. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE