IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15786 of 2009 Lakshman Sahu Lakshman Sahu, son of Late Ram Dayal Sahu resident of Mohalla Kishori Lal Chowk, Ward No.11, PS and District Madhubani – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar. 2) The Dist. Magistrate, Madhubani. 3) The Circle Officer, Rahika, PS Rahika, Dist. Madhubani – Respondents. 5 29.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This court has already discussed and passed a detailed order today in CWJC No. 13816/2009. Apparently the lands appertaining to Mauza Madhubani, khata no. 312, Khesra no. 89, area 3 bigha 18 kathas and 7 dhurs were settled by the ex-landlord in favour of Laxman Sahni and another. The court while disposing of the aforesaid writ petition has held that without a proper legal proceeding under section 4G and 4H of the Act, the Jamabandi of Laxman Sahni and others could not have been cancelled. Laxman Sahni sold the land in question to one Lal Kant Jha and Laxmi Kant Jha. The petitioner is the purchaser from the aforesaid two persons. The sale deed of the petitioner was registered after the orders of this court in CWJC No. 5994/1982. After the registration of the sale deed in favour of the petitioner, notice under section 4H was issued against the petitioner. Ultimately the Commissioner of the Division set aside and quashed the notice under section 4H of the Act. The facts of the present case are similar to the facts of CWJC No. 13816/2009 in which as aforesaid a detailed order has 2 been passed today. The petitioner seeks to quash the order contained in Annexure 6 by which he has been asked to remove the encroachment from the lands in question vide notice, dated 30.10.2009 issued by the Circle Officer, Rahika. For the reasons mentioned in the order passed today in CWJC No. 13816/2009, I quash the order contained in Annexure 6. This writ petition is, thus, allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J .)