IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1001 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.3.2009 Gupreet Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Angrej Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. D.S. Gurna, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated February 12, 2009 passed by the learned Court below whereby the objections filed by the petitioners in execution of a decree passed in favour of respondent No.1 were dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners in the present case are minor and in execution of the decree their property was being sold which cannot be permitted as interest of the minor was required to be protected. However, after hearing learned counsel for the petitioners I do not find any merit in the submissions made. It is a case where the decree was passed in favour of respondent No.1 and against Sant Singh, grand-father of the petitioners way back on 5.8.2004 and in execution proceedings arising out of that decree the petitioners raised objections as they had inherited the property of deceased Sant Singh because their father had died prior to the death of their grandfather. Once the property in dispute was subject matter of litigation between the person from whom the petitioners have inherited the property and a decree had already been passed against the predecessor in interest of the petitioners, the petitioners will have to step into his shoe only and they cannot claim any better title or right than the person from whom they had inherited the property. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 19.3.2009 JUDGE Reema