Cri. Apln. No. 1968/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1968 OF 2011 Dr. Sandip Mangal Patil, R/o. Mohit Apartment No. 3, Flat No. 47, Samarth Nagar, Satpur, Nashik. ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. P.P. Dhorde, Advocate for original complainant. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 21st June, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Cr. No. 75/2011 registered in Dharangaon Police Station, District Jalgaon for offences under sections 498­A, 323, 379, 34 etc. of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Interim relief is already granted by this Court. Today the advocate of the applicant submitted that compromise has taken place between the original complainant and the present applicant and the complainant has resumed cohabitation with applicant. Advocate Shri. P. P. Dhorde has filed Vakalatnama for original complainant Smt. Vaishali Patil. A copy of Cri. Apln. No. 1968/11 2 the compromise deed dated 9.6.2011 is filed by these two advocates which shows that the original complainant has returned to matrimonial house and she has resumed cohabitation. In view of these circumstances, the advocate for the original complainant Shri. Dhorde submitted that anticipatory bail may be granted to the present applicant. The APP submitted that he has not been intimated about such compromise and he has no instructions in regard to so called compromise. 3. The Courts are expected to take a view which favours the resumption of cohabitation. The parties are educated persons in the present proceedings and if they resumes cohabitation, it is good thing for everybody. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, ad­ interim relief already granted is confirmed and the application stands disposed of accordingly. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln1968/11