IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2011 / 16TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 31057 of 2004(V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. T.P.ABDUL SALAM, S/O.ISMAIL KUTTY HAI, THAYYIL PATTAKKAL HOUSE, KUNIYIL, KEEZHUPARAMBA AMSOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ATHRANGADHAN SUBRAMANIAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, CHATHALLOOR, PERAKAMANNA P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. OORNGATTIRI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, EDAVANNA, P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. EDAVANNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OORGATTIRI P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SAKEER, S/O.ATHAN HAJI, ORKATTERI P.O. VADAKARA VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 5. THIRUVARAKKADAN UMMER, KAVANOOR P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.T.MUHAMOOD R2 BY ADVS. SRI.K.ANAND R3 BY SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON R5 BY SRI.BABU S. NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.31057/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE LOCAL RESIDENTS OF UROOLAM KUNNU BEFORE THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS DTD.3.4.3004. P2:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE IST PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT, DTD.12.10.2004. P3:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT, DTD. 16.10.2004. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.31057/2004-V ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 6th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T A direction was issued by this Court on 04/01/2005 to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Perinthalmanna to inspect the premises of respondents 4 and 5 and to take appropriate follow-up action. The learned Government Pleader on getting instructions submitted that subsequently, the Revenue Divisional Officer had submitted a report to the District Collector and finalised the follow-up action and thereafter issued a stop memo and the quarry operations have been stopped also. In that view of the matter, no further orders are called for in the matter. But, this will not stand in the way of an application made by any party being considered for issuance of licence and the same will be considered only in terms of the various enactments in force as well as the provisions of the Panchayat Act by the Panchayat concerned. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms