HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD MAIN CASE NO: W.P.No.25733 of 2009 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 15-11-2010 LNR,J WPMP No.27712 of 2010 The petitioner filed W.P.No.25733 of 2009 complaining that his claim for payment of compensation for the land in Survey Nos.90 and 91 of Kanaipally Village, Kothakota Mandal, Mahabubnagar District was not considered by the Land Acquisition Officer. The writ petition was disposed of on 29.04.2010, taking note of the fact that the Land Acquisition Officer passed an order, dated 22.03.2010, and leaving it open to the petitioner to seek reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’). This application is filed stating that when the petitioner approached the Land Acquisition Officer seeking reference, an objection is raised to the effect that it is only a reference under Section 30 of the Act that can be made and not the one under Section 18. The learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, on instructions, submits that the apprehension of the petitioner is without any basis. It is stated that as and when the petitioner makes an application, the respondents would take necessary steps in compliance with the directions of this Curt. Hence, nothing needs to be mentioned at this stage. ________________ 15.11.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE T h e delay is, no doubt, enormous. The petitioner, however, states that even according to respondent No.1, who is the plaintiff in the suit, not only there was a compromise between the parties, but also more than half of the amount was paid and such a representation was made before the trial Court in the year 2003. He contends that on account of the steps being taken for implementation of the compromise, he did not evince any interest and he was not aware of the preliminary decree till it was brought to the notice in the recent past. Notice returnable in three weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents and file proof of service. ____________ 02 08 2010 SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02.08.2010 kdl SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE Notice returnable in three (3) weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents and file proof of service. Notice returnable in three (3) weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents and file proof of service. ____________ 15.09.2009 The Tr.C.M.P. is not yet numbered. There is no endorsement to the effect that it suffers from any infirmity nor was it returned. Further, this Court has already issued notice to the respondents. The Registry is directed to number the Tr.C.M.P. ________________ 02.09.2010 Tr.C.M.P. is allowed. (vide separate order) (B/o) kdl