IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OFAPRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.917 of 2008 Between: A.Ramakrishna Prasad. … Petitioner And The Station House Officer, Kukatpally Police Station, Kukatpally, Cyberabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri C.Raghu. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home for R.1. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in property bearing Plot No.8 of Survey No.100/B of Nizampet, Qutbullahpur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner also sought for a direction to respondent No.1 not to interfere with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home passed-on a counter-affidavit signed by the Inspector of Police, Kukatpally Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate (respondent No.1 herein), wherein it is, inter alia, mentioned that investigation into Crime No.41 of 2008 - registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447,427 and 506 IPC on 12-1-2008 against one Mirza Kareem Baig and others on the complaint given by one Sri A.Sri Ramulu with respect to Plot No.8, admeasuring 260 Sq. yards situated in Survey No.100/B, Madhura Nagar, Nizampet village, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District - has been completed and charge-sheet was filed on 23-1-2008 before the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally. He, however, denied the allegation of the petitioner that he is pressurizing the petitioner to compromise with respondents 2 and 3 and vacate the said property. He asserted that he never interfered in the civil disputes or threatened the petitioner to vacate the said property except registering the said Crime and investigating into the same. In view of the categorical assertion of respondent No.1 that he is not interfering in the civil dispute, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 28-4-2008 MNR