Ill THE HIGH COURT OF KRNATAK AT B ALOR DkTEI) THIS 26TH tW OF 1AY 1998 PRESENT THE HONLE ?IR,R,P,SETHI, CKIF JUSTICE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE 14,8 • VI SHANATH tTtONNO,28O73 1997, ETEEN: Smt, Gown 0 Wjo Dr.L,C,Mullatti, Major 0 Primary Shoo1 Techer 0 H,G,M,G, Sc1oo1, Moonicjayiramath Hublj, Dharwad Dist ,,,Petittorier (By Sni,R.C,Gou1y, k3v, for Petitioner 1 The Scrtar,, Karnatk Public ervice Counisio Park doe 0 al r —1 —2— 2, The Karnataka mnv, Tribunal, ,D, Domplex, mdi ranagar, sang lore—39, by its Chairman, , Re sporents Irjt Petition filed Under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of tdia with an kffidavit ,raying to Set asid the carder vid Annex,C dt,4—9—97 & etc. Ant Petition is coming on for Pre liminary !eaning this ‘ay, the fiorible Chief Yustice made the ollctng : ORDER KR Cause it cOny soy, ‘9!- 26tnN 7 ,199e VP 28073/1917 O€R Learned counsel for the petitioner mabuits that despite findings written in favour of his client in para 19 of its order, the Tribunal was not justified in rejecting the application filed for the redressal of the grievace projected by the petitioner. % it as it may, we are not inclined to interfere with the oreer of the Administrative Tribunal on this ground. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to approach the Tribunal by way of review petition for seeking appropriate orders on the pleas projected before us. Dismissed with liberty to file review pet ton before the Tribunal • As ad when such review application is filed along with t e application for condonation of delay, the sae *all be considered at disposed of i accordace with the proviyions f law ad tue facts of the ease. Sd! a69b a a