CLCON 104/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri Gopal Datt Joshi, the learned counsel for the applicants. The writ court by judgment dated 6th July, 2010, had partly allowed the writ petition and issued a mandamus to the respondents to decide the application of the petitioners for appointment on compassionate ground. Based on the aforesaid direction, the respondents have decided the application of the applicants vide order dated 1st October, 2010. The applicants, being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, has filed the present contempt petition alleging that the respondents have not decided the application in terms of the direction of this Court and therefore, the opposite parties are in contempt. In the opinion of the Court, assuming that the opposite parties have not adhered to the direction given by the writ court, the Court finds that no wilful disobedience of the order of the writ court is made out. At the most, the order of the opposite parties could be termed as an erroneous decision, for which the remedy lies elsewhere and not in this contempt forum. The contempt petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 09-05-2011 SP