Sr. No. Date Orders roUMl' t>F liELtil A'J' imW' DELHI -f W,P.(C)20i 9/200 i INUIAN AiRLlNES Petitioner Tlirougli ]Vli'. Lai it Bhasin, Adv. versus SEC, GOVi'. OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Dr. Surat Singh with Ms. Mamla Rani, Mr. Inderjet Singh and Mr.Kulbhushan for Advs, for RM, Ms. Rekha Mil, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. .JUSTICE MAD AN B. LOKUR /€) ORDER 20.(^9.21)04 Learned counsel for the Central Government says tliat tlie reference order made on 22"^ November, 2000 may be quashed because it is contrary to the judgment of tlie Division Bench of tliis Court in CW 2644/97 (Gurpal Singh & Ors. vs. Indian Aiiiines & Ors.) decided on 2P' August, 1998. In view of the statement of learned counsel for tlie Central Government, tliat has been made on instiuctions, tlie impugned leference SHRI SHYAM SALES 02-03 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Sr. No. Date f \ m is quashed. Orders Leai'ned counsel for Respondent No.4 says that as per his instiuctions the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench of this Court is not being implemented and that he would like to take steps in this regard. There is no prohibition against Respondent No.4 in taking such steps as permitted by law. However, for the record, learned counsel for the Petitioner says that as fai- as he is instracted, the judgment is being implemented. The writ petition stands disposed of. CM 3478/200i& CM 1282/2003. SEPTEMBER 20,2004 rkr MADANB.LOKUR,J SHRI SHYAM SALES 02-03