WPSS No.1783 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Bist, Brief Holder for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the year 2003, petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher Primary School and at present is working at Primary School, Bilona, District Bageshwar. On 30.05.2009, an advertisement was issued by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission for the post of Lecturer Biology. Petitioner applied for the said post and was selected. After her selection, she was issued appointment letter dated 17.03.2011, by which she was posted at G.G.I.C. Kakar, District Champawat. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that some posts of Lecturer in Biology are vacant in Government Inter Colleges, District Bageshwar, therefore, she may be posted in some nearby college against the vacant post. Petitioner made representation before the respondent no.2 to consider her application for posting against the vacant post of Lecturer Biology at G.G.I.C. Bageshwar or other nearby area. But nothing has been done by the respondent no.2 so far. This representation is based on the Government Order No.194/XXIV- 2/2011-13(33)/2010 dated 10th March, 2011, which provides that for the appointment of lady teacher, preference shall be given for her posting in the same institution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of this Government Order, the respondents should have considered the representation of the petitioner and should have amended the appointment order and should have posted the petitioner at the same place. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the Government Order dated 10th March, 2011. Learned Brief Holder for the State also submitted that it will be appropriate, in case, such direction is issued to the respondent no.2 and the representation of the petitioner will be decided in accordance with law. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.03.2011 expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of the order. Interim Relief Application (CLMA No.12991 of 2011) also stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 13.12.2011