IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 24TH MAGHA 1930 WA.No. 199 of 2009(E) ------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.288/2009 IN W.P.(C).NO.38072/2008 DATED 13/01/2009) .................... APPELLANT/ PETITIONER/ ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M. RAJASEKHARAN NAYAR, S/O. LATE SRI.P.N. MADHAVAN PILLAI, ADVOCATE, PANTHIYIL, WARRIAM ROAD, KOCHI - 682 016. BY MR. M. RAJASEKHARAN NAYAR (PARTY-IN-PERSON). RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. KERALA HIGH COURT ADVOCATES' ASSOCIATION, REGISTERED UNDER ER 931/2004, HIGH COURT BUILDING, KOCHI-682 031. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, PARK AVENUE, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. BENJAMIN PAUL, R1 BY ADV. MR.G.SHRIKUMAR, R3 BY MR.PRAVEEN K.JOY, S.C,COCHIN CORPORATION. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/02/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. J.B.KOSHY, Ag.C.J. & P.BHAVADASAN, J. -------------------------------------- W.A.No.199 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated 13th February, 2009 JUDGMENT Koshy, Ag.C.J . Petitioner's impleading petition was rejected by the learned single Judge. It is true that subject matter of the dispute is between the Advocates' association and Corporation. It is the case of the petitioner that Corporation issued the impugned order because of his complaint. We are not going into the merits of the allegations raised by the petitioner in this appeal, but, we are of the opinion that nothing wrong will happen if petitioner is also heard. Therefore, we set aside the impugned order. The impleading petition may be posted along with the writ petition and order on the petition can be passed along with the final judgment so that his point of view also can be considered by the learned single Judge while disposing of the writ petition. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. J.B.KOSHY ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN JUDGE tks