IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPA) No.232/2011 in Criminal Appeal No. /2011. ( Shri Ganesh Nagri Sahkari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Akola, through its authorized signatory ..Vs.. Prakash s/o Shamrao Pachpor ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mrs. P.M. Chandekar, Adv. for applicant. CORAM : M.N. GILANI, J. DATED : 21.6.2011. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the judgment delivered by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola in Summary Criminal Case No.12018/2005. The said case was filed by the applicant alleging dishonour of cheque issued in their favour by the respondent to discharge existing liability of Rs.38,045/-. Learned Magistrate after examining the evidence, adduced during the trial, held that the respondent had issued cheque in favour of the applicant. Other formalities of presenting the cheque to the banker, dishonour of cheque, issuance of notice have been complied with by the applicant. In an appeal carried to learned Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, learned Additional Sessions Judge found that in all 20 cheques in advance were issued in favour of the applicant by way of security. He, found fault with the stamped date appearing on the cheques. It seems that learned Additional Sessions Judge has ignored the provisions of section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Even the decision of this Court in the case of M/s. Pioneer Drip V/s. Ms. Jain 2010 ALL MR (Cri) was ignored by learned Additional Sessions Judge. In view of the above, arguable points are involved. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. Action under section 390 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.3,000/- (Rs. Three Thousand Only). Returnable after eight weeks. JUDGE Tambaskar.