IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5549 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- VINAYKANT LALJI HIRANI Versus JANARDHANRAI D PANDYA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PM RAVAL for Petitioner MR PV HATHI for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2 MR DP JOSHI ASSTT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 11/02/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard Mr. Harin P. Raval for Mr.P.M.Raval, learned advocate for petitioner and Mr. P.V.Hathi, learned advocate for respondent no.1 as also Mr. D.P.Joshi, learned AGP for respondent no.4 - the State of Gujarat. 2. Mr. Raval makes a statement at the Bar that this petition has become infructuous and now nothing survives in the matter. It goes without saying that the court is not expressing any opinion on merits of the matter. In view of the statement made as above, this special civil application does not survive and the same stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Date: 11/2/2000. ------ (ccshah )