1 W.P. No.6599 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.6599 of 2009 Sharad Adiwasi Sewabhavi Sanstha Pandharpur, Taluka and District Aurangabad. .. Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents. -------- Dr. Shrikant K. Patil, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri. S.K. Kadam, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Smt. Manjusha Deshpande, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Shri. V.D. Sapkal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 21st DECEMBER 2011 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner filed a proposal for starting primary school in the year 2008-2009. The District Level Committee and the State Level Committee did not 2 W.P. No.6599 of 2009 recommend the case of the petitioner. The petitioner aggrieved thereby has filed the present petition. 3) The respondents have filed affidavits-in-reply. The Education Officer has stated that there are already four schools being run in Waluj area. The District Level Committee did not recommend the case of the petitioner, therefore, permission could not be granted. 4) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Waluj being a large area there is a need for more schools and therefore the petitioner's case ought to have been considered favourably. 5) We have considered the submissions advanced and the replies filed. No interference is warranted at this stage. The petitioner is entitled to file fresh proposal in future in accordance with the policy of the State Government. 6) The writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl