IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 19th November, 2008 Criminal Bail Application No. 911 of 2008 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Kishan S/o Ram Charan …..Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Opposite Party Arising out of F.I.R. No. 287 of 2008 Under Sections: 394 & 411 I.P.C. P.S. Kashipur, District U.S. Nagar Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State. Perused the record. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR; perusal of para 10 of the counter affidavit; the fact that the D.V.D. Player has not been indicated in the FIR; and as per Annexure-II to the bail petition the recovery of D.V.D. Player has been shown by the police, but there is no link evidence that the recovered D.V.D. Player was ever robbed from the complainant, I deem it proper to release the applicant on bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J .) Dated 19.11.2008 LSR