s- #4 % 25.04.2011 Present: Petitioners in person with Mr.F.K.Jha, Advocate. Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State/respondent. Respondent No. 2 in person with Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate. +Crl.M.C. 820/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seel<ing quashing of FIR No.1308/2003 under Sections 452/323/341/34 IPC registered at P.S. Sultanpuri on the complaint of the respondent No.2. Ground for seeking quashing is that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now there is no dispute left between them. Petitioners are identified by their counsel Sh.F.K.Jha, Advocate. Respondent No.2 Ram Dayal Mahto is identified by his counsel Sh.Rupesh Kumar, Advocate. It is submitted by the parties that the FIR is the result of an altercation, which took place on account of the dispute about the payment of money by ^ ^PashupatiJha, petitionerNo. 4 to the complainantRam Dayal Mahto. As per the FIR, the occurrence took place on the spur of moment. It is further submitted that the parties are respectable people and they have amicably settled the matter in dispute, as such, no purpose shall be served by prosecuting the petitioners on the basis of the FIR. Respondent No. 2 states that he has entered into an amicable settlement with the petitioners of his own accord without any inducement or Signing Date:28.08.2024 16:54:31 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified (Aj}fBHARIHOKE) JUDGE APRIL 25, 2011 akb \ threat and now, there is no dispute left. He further states that he has filed an affidavit in this regard, which is annexed to the petition and he does not want any action against the petitioners on his FIR and he has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Learned APP appearing for the State submits that in view of the settlement arrived between the parties. State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. In view of the statement of the complainant and his affidavit, it is W- ^ obvious that the occurrence was the result of private dispute and the parties have settled the matter and now, there is no dispute left between them. Therefore, in my considered view, no purpose shall be served by prosecuting the petitioners on the basis of the FIR lodged by the respondent No. 2, who has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No. 1308/2003 registered at P.S. Sultanpuri and the proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. ^ Petitionstandsdisposedof.