THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10735 of 2010 April 30, 2010 Between: S.G.Ahmed Quadri, S/o.Syed Jeelani Quadri And others … Petitioners And The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad And others ... Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.10735 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioners statedly purchased land admeasuring Acs.0.15 guntas in survey No.38/1 situated at Khanamet Village in Ranga Reddy District. Since then they are in possession of the property. The dispute regarding nature of property is finally decided by a Division Bench of this Court by common order dated 02.9.2008 in W.P.No.14795 of 2005 and batch and that it is a patta land. The petitioner executed partition deed and submitted to second respondent for registration. The second respondent refused to receive the document for registration. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to receive and register the document executed by petitioners. Be it noted that when a document is presented, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to examine the same with reference to Sections 31 to 36 of the Act and/or Rules 26 to 58 of the Andhra Pradesh Rules under the Act. This aspect of the matter was considered by my learned brother Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy in W.P.No.15199 of 2004, dated 01.9.2004. Following the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing second respondent or any other Registering Officer to consider the document presented by the petitioners for registration. Be it noted, if for any reason, the document presented is not registered, it is incumbent on the part of the Registering Officer to record and furnish reasons under Section 71 of the Act. Even thereafter, if petitioners have any grievance, they may file appeal before the appellate authority under Section 72 of the Act. Thereafter, if any adverse order is passed by the appellate authority, the petitioners can file a suit under Section 77 of the Act. Be it made clear that this order shall not be construed as conferring any right on the petitioners and that the observations made herein above are only for the purpose of disposal of this matter. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) April 30, 2010 YS