Civil Revision No.3549 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No.3549 of 2010 Date of Decision: 2.7.2010 Ramesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus Bal Krishan and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. C.B.Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.N. Moudgil, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 7. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he has raised an alternative plea of adverse possession in his written statement. After the arguments were addressed and the case was ripe for pronouncement of judgment, an application dated 18.3.2010 (Annexure P3) was filed by the plaintiff that no issue was framed regarding the fact that the defendant has become owner by way of adverse possession. This application was accepted by the trial Court vide order dated 3.5.2010 and the following issues were framed as 4A and 4B:- “4A. Whether defendants are owners of the suit property? OPD Civil Revision No.3549 of 2010 2 4B. Whether the possession of the defendants has been adverse and has matured into ownership, as claimed alternatively? OPD” Now the case of petitioner/defendant is that he is ready to abandon the plea of adverse possession and will not press the same. It is further submitted that the defendant will not lead any evidence on the additional issues framed. This plea of the defendant, raised before this Court, be noticed by the trial Court at the time of arguments and the judgment be pronounced within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The respondents/plaintiffs will be at liberty to raise an argument before the trial Court that the petitioner pleaded that he is in adverse possession. With the observations made above, the present petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 2, 2010 “DK”