IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWETIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NOs : 813 and 996 of 2002 WRIT APPEAL NO : 813 of 2002 Between: M/s. Godavari Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., Secunderabad ..... APPELLANT(S) AND V.R.K.Murali Mohana Rao ………..Respondents WRIT APPEAL NO : 996 of 2002 Between: V.R.K.Murali Mohana Rao ..... APPELLANT(S) AND M/s. Godavari Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., Secunderabad ………..Respondents THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NOs : 813 and 996 of 2002 COMMON JUDGMENT (Per BPR,J): The learned counsel, appearing for the appellants in both the writ appeals, represents that the subject matter in the writ appeals has become infructuous. Accordingly, both the writ appeals are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Date: 20th August 2009 _______________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR KVR