IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2403 of 2008 DR. RAM PRASAD PASWAN . Versus SWAPNA MUKHERJI,B.S.E.B & ORS . ----------- 05. 24.02.2010 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Opposite Party. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party submits that the order of this court has been complied with by passing the appropriate order vide Memo No. 252 dated 02.02.2009 as contained in Annexure- A series. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order as contained in Annexure – ‘A’ series is not correct in law and as such, petitioner proposes to assail the same in an appropriate proceedings. In view of the above, since the order has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same stands disposed of. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)