1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.97/2008 {Ramji Lal & Others Versus Banwari Lal & Others} Date of Order :: 7th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Ajay Gupta for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The plaintiff – respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction in the trial court, wherein the defendants – petitioners filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC stating therein that the disputed land is agriculture land, therefore, Civil Court has got no jurisdiction to try and hear the suit as it is exclusively triable by the revenue court, therefore, the suit is liable to be dismissed and the same may be dismissed. The said application has been rejected by the trial court. Being aggrieved with the same, the present revision petition has been preferred by the defendants. 3. The learned counsel for the 2 petitioners contended that as per jama bandi of khasra no. 646/1, which has been referred by the trial court in the impugned order, it is clear that it is an agriculture land. However, during the course of arguments, the khasra girdawari of khasra no. 646/1 was referred wherein the said land has been shown as abadi dharamshala. No doubt that jama bandi is record of title but khasra girdawari shows actual position of the land and according to khasra girdawari, the said land has been shown as abadi, therefore, in these circumstances, I find that the learned trial court has rightly rejected the application of the defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and the order passed by the trial court does not call for any interference by this Court. 4. There is no merit in this revision petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK