-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.277 OF 2006 PETITION NO.277 OF 2006 PETITION NO.277 OF 2006 J. Mahender Reddy ...Petitioner v/s Union of India through the Chief Engineer (Construction), Central Railway, Mumbai 400 001 ...Respondents Mr S.U. Kamdar i/b Mr V.L. Panjuani for Petitioner. Mr T.J. Pandian for Respondent. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 16TH OCTOBER 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. Even after remand, in the award proper reasons are not given by the learned Arbitrator. Therefore, by consent of parties, the award impugned in the petition is set aside. 2. The learned counsel appearing for respondents states that within a period of six weeks from the date on which the General Manager, Central Railway receives copy of this order, he shall appoint a different person as Arbitrator and refer the disputes between the parties to him for de novo consideration and decision in accordance with law. Statement is accepted. Petition is disposed off with no order as to costs. Petitioner to serve copy of this order on the General Manager, Central Railway. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ---------------------