IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18432 of 2010 SOMAN NADAF Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Soman Nadaf who is in custody since 26.2.2010 in Bathnaha P.S. Case No.7/08 corresponding to S.Tr. No.239/10 under sections 302, 201 and 34 of I.P.C. Heard the learned A.P.P. also. According to the prosecution case the informant alleged that his son was taken away by the named accused persons including this petitioner to a Bhagat. On the next day his son was found dead. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was dispute between the parties from before and there is no evidence except the statement made by the informant to the effect that this petitioner along with the co-accused was last seen with this petitioner and similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Badre Alam and Lal Babu Nadaf have already been granted bail by this Court. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected the prayer for bail of the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is on similar footing to that of co-accused, Lal Babu Nadaf and Badre Alam who have been granted bail earlier by this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case I direct that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond 2 of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Sitamarhi. One of the bailers should be relation of the petitioner and if the petitioner remains absent for two consecutive dates his bail bond shall be cancelled. AnilKr.Sinha ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J. )