HIGH COURT OP CHHATriSOARH, BILASPUR W.P. (81 No.6100/2007 PBTITIONER RJBSPONDBNTS Rohini Bai Dhruwanshi, Widow of Late Chaadulal Dhruwanshi, aged about 60 years, Resident of Bus Stand Kurud, Tahsil, Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G) Versus 1. State of Ctihattisgarh, Tbrougti: Tbe Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Executive Engineer, MahanaDdi Jal Prabaadh, Dam, Divisiou No.2, Rudri, District Dhamtari (C.G) 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Water Maaagement, Division No.2, Bhathagaon, District Dhamtari (C.G) WRIT PETITION IWDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COHSTITUTION OP INDIA Appearance: Shri P.P, Sahu, CoTuisel for tfae petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate aad Deputy Advocate General wifh Shri A.S. KacMiwaha, Govt. Advocate for the Slate/respondents. (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUBSAR SIWHA. J, Heari. Learaed couasel for the petitioner submits that a permaaent Gaag-inaa is to be retired at the age of 62 years ia accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiruyam 1967 read with Fundamental Riiles, 56. He also subinits that fbe poiat raised has been decided by this Court ia batch ofmatters i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 aad maay other coiinected inatters on 04.01.2007, reported ia 2QQ7 12) C.G.UJ. 29 {Govind Ss Others vs. State ofC.G. and others) and fhis matter is squarely covered by that decision, wlucb may be disposed ofon fhe saine terms. W.P.(S)No.6100/2007 ^o Raoi Shyna Leamed counsel for the State fairly ayrees that this matter is covered by the said decision. However, he submits that in soxne matteis fhe State has ffled writ appeals. Unless soiae interun order is passed, meTely on accouat of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of tbis writ petftion carmot be kept ia abeyaace, wlien the iiiatter is squarely covered by the said judgment. In the result, this petition is aUowed. It is disposed of ia terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed ia W.P. No. 108/2005 aad other coimected matters. No order as to cost. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^.