IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 530 OF 2009 (MS) Vedpal Singh …………Petitioner. Versus Union of India and others. …Respondents. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Asstt. S.G. for respondents. 21st April, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Counter affidavit has been filed in this case on behalf of the Revenue Department. The contention of the petitioner is that his bank account has been attached provisionally under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for a period of six months. Further contention of the petitioner is that money which the petitioner has deposited with the Bank is an agricultural income and is not liable to be taxed. However, this is a matter to be examined by the Revenue Authorities. Apparently there is a provision for provisional attachment of the bank account under which the Income Tax Authorities have proceeded against the petitioner. No interference is called for on this matter, at this stage. The only grievance of the petitioner is that he may be allowed to file his returns however he says that the last date of filing returns was 14th April, 2009. However, Mr. Arvind Vashisth, counsel for the respondents gives an undertaking to the Court that in case he files his return within a period of two weeks, the same shall be assessed. In view of the assurance given by the counsel for the respondents, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 21.4.2009 Rathour