IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2009 / 29TH ASHADHA 1931 LA.App..No. 514 of 2008() ------------------------- LAR.318/2001 of ADL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN LAR ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT & 2ND RESPONDENT IN LAR ----------------------------------------------- 1. NHATEYALA MANOJ, BHAVANA, CHONADAM, ERANHOLI P.O., ERANHOLI AMSOM AND DESOM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, 'KINFRA', VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH FOR R2 SRI.R.SURENDRAN FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.514 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Heard Sri.Basant Balaji, the learned senior Government Pleader for the appellant, Sri.R.Surendran, learned counsel for the claimant and Sri.G.S.Reghunath, the learned counsel for the requisitioning authority. We have gone through the impugned judgment. 2. Having considered the rival submissions, we are of the view that it is more or less the correct market value of the acquired property at the relevant time which has been arrived at by the learned Subordinate Judge. In fact, findings regarding the market value of the acquired property entered by the learned Subordinate Judge were founded on evidence which is actually available on record. There is no warrant at all for entertaining this appeal. The appeal will stand dismissed in limine. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk