HIGH COURT OFCHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT‘MBILASPUR Wri'r Pz'ri'fion (5) Na. 3928 of 2008 Pe'rifioner Dashmfh La! Verma,, 5/0. Son-r Ram Verma, aged abou? 62'years, Village Pmsari, P05? - Knrmada, Tehsil I; \ Baloda Bazar, Dis'h'icf — Raipur (56.) Versus ‘ Reqmnden'fs 1. Sm‘fz of Chbafl'isgnrh, Thrnugh Secretary, Wawr Resaurces Deparfmem, D.K.5. Bhavan, Man‘frqhya, Rnipur (CG). 2. Superimenden? Engineer, Electricu! '& Mechanical, Wafer Resourws Department Raipur (C.6.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division No.7, Baloda Razor, Dis'rric'i' - Raipur ((26.3 WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE (:DNSTITUTION OF INDIA singi: Baruch : Han'blz Mr. swish K. Agniho‘tri, :T. .Shri Sunil O‘Mmni, Advoca'kz for- ‘Hne pe'i'ii'ianzr. Shri Arun 5m, Govt Advo‘m‘l’e for- 'l‘ha’respondenfs. ORAL ORDER (Passed gr: this 23rd day cf Juiy, zoos) 1. Wi'rh fhe consen-r of +he par'rizs 111a marker is fakan up for final hmring. 2. This mamr pertains fa refiml dues. This Couwr in $2 mn'H'er of Wrif Pe'i’i‘tion No. 4642/2004 (Baijmfh Mandal Vs. The S'i'a‘rz of Chhaffisgar-h é others) and other connecfed markers, decided on 31.1.2008, direc'red +he Commi'hee 'l'o consider ihe mo'H'er of reriral dues as 'H1e dispu-red quesfion of facts were ‘ivwoived. The CommM'ee was consii‘ru'red by +he S'fa'i'e Government pursuoni’ 1'0 +he order do+ed 19.6.2006 passed in W.P.No. 1961/2006 (Suit Kejn \fx Bai Chandmkor Vs. Sinie Govemmenf and ofher‘s) and order do‘l’ed e g ... @ 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (5mm of Chhn'rrisgarh and ' a'thers Vs Baijnafh Manda! and anofhar). Thus, fhis pefi‘rion is square!y severed by thg judgmen'r wed order dated 31” of JmL-ary, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 (Baijna‘th Mandal Vs The S‘I’m'e 0f Chhn'l'fisgarh & others) and a+her cannec'ted maffevs, ds submirfed by la‘amad counsel appearing far +h2 par-ties. Wi-rh fhe consen-r of +he parfies, fhis pa'ri-rion is accardingSy disposed af in +h2 same urms ie. Hue office of 111a Advamfe éaneml is d£recfed fa send fhe case +0 ‘rhe Commi‘H'ae, wi'thin a pariad of 15 days fram 1412 da'fe of receip'r of a copy of the pz'ri‘rion from fine pa+i+ion2r aiong wH‘h a copy of fhis order. Thereafter, #he Commi‘H'ee shall issue no‘rioe 'l-o +l1e peli'l'ioner and .‘l'he officers concerned, wi'rhin a further period of 15 days. The Commi'Hee shall consider and pass order, in accordance wifh law, offer affordin proper opporfuni‘ly of hearing +0 'l’he pefi'l'ioner. The pe‘i'ifioner and +he officer concerned may file addi'rionai documen+s, if necessary. The enfire'exercise, including paymen-l' of re'l-irai dues, if any, fa fhe pe'ri‘iioner be complefed wi'rhin a period af four months from 'the da'fe af receip'r of fhe fiie from 'lhe office af 'l’he Advoca'l'e General The pefifioner shall supply exfra .capy of 'rhe pe'ri'l’ian along wifh a copy of 1his order to learned counsel appearing for ‘the respondents, for sending fa fhe said carnmi‘H'ee. Sd/— T ’ atish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur g S