IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 6th day of April, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 396 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ravindra Singh @ Rinku .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of FIR No. 92/2010, U/s 452/307/506 IPC, PS Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. April 6, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. SK Mandal, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State and Mr. RS Bisht, Advocate for the complainant. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that the role assigned to the applicant accused is this that he caused injuries on the left hand of Yashveer Rathi and as per the medical report and supplementary report, injury no. 1 is shown to be simple in nature as per the opinion of the Medical Officer and injury is not on the vital part of the body. It was also not shown that the applicant accused has caused injuries to Yashveer Rathi with intention to kill him. He further submitted that the applicant accused has got no previous criminal history. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Ravindra Singh @ Rinku be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 6.4.2010 2 PRABODH