IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2695 of 2010 DEVA NAND SINGH Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 2 16.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is aggrieved due to his non-selection and appointment of respondent no. 4 to be the dealer of respondent Bharat Petroleum Corporation. His general submission is that the terms and conditions of the advertisement have not been followed. In the guidelines issued by the Company and the Ministry there is in house mechanism for grievance redressal. Let the petitioner file his objection with specific reasons of which he challenged the selection of respondent no.4 and the concerned authority will be obliged to respond to the petitioner’s allegations within the time frame fixed therein. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the decision of the respondent he has the remedy under the law. This writ application is disposed of with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)