1 rma IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 605 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO. 1183 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO. 3769 OF 2000 WITH APPEAL NO. 1183 OF 2002 Batra Developments .. Appellant Vs B.C. Silaichia .. Respondent ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 607 OF 2004 IN APPEAL NO. 1182 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO. 3768 OF 2000 WITH APPEAL NO. 1182 OF 2002 Batra Developments .. Appellant Vs Prakash .C. Silaichia .. Respondent Jyoti Saigal for the Appellant CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ DATE : 3rd March, 2010 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel mentioned these Motions in second half and stated that the parties have already settled all the disputes covered 12B.NMA605&607-04 2 by these Appeals. She, therefore, seeks leave to restore the Motions with liberty to withdraw the Appeals. 2. The Motions are restored and allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. The Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Refund of the Court fees as per Rules. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.] 12B.NMA605&607-04