d^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITJPETITION 10 N0. ^^ OF2009 (S.B.l PETITIONER A RESPONDENTS Purushottam Choubey, S/o Late Shri Dhannu Lal Chaoubey, aged about 48 years, R/o village Saja, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Govemment of D.K.S. i, '^?>05'. ^i-ri:"^"^".".". Chhattisgarh Mantralya, p.R.Wo.--'-;::.;'^^^?^-1-' ~-"—-—o~"-•-——.-. sertedB''is?-"-^""c/,^......—- Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). presB»i.°" •-• ^........j< ^&..---^\ ......"•—• Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Additional Secretary, Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Govemment of Chhattisgarh Mantralya, D.K.S. /Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. District and Session Judge, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA. 1950 Nl; mGHCOURTOFeHHAT'I'ISSARHAIBILASPUK WRrrPETinONCGl No. 7038 of2009 PETmONEK : PuiusKfittamChoubey. ^ ^VERSUS'.,:•.• ^ RESPONDENTS : Stateofehhattiseaifa&Others. ; WRIT PETmON 1UNBERM13©I^226 OiF'IHE'eC^SimjT^ SBfcHiBD'bteMriSatisliI^AeriibotFi.J. PreSent: Shri Amiya Kant Tinan, Aadvbeate &T111®petitiiMi^r. ^; .' SN M^.S.Bhatia,pE^^;6.A.^fw^State^sp<md^lS2.1 QBDERtORAD .. •; .' "' ;. ..5' : ^ yss^sm^d^af^Septeis^^l^^ By this petition, thfiipetitionerlias praj^ EM dneetum to fe respondents to renewthecertificatepfpra(^ceasNotarytotepe(itipner ordet Satsd IQ^^M^ (Ata xaieWl)^^^:^3^ f^i^^ passed by tte respondent/State, Nlereby? the ^etitioner's? a^ilieatiotr:Ior renewal ofhisNotarial©ertifieatehasbeeit;refuse<l. Leamed counsel appeanng fbr the petitionCT'sutMmts th^ t^ ).09.2009 (Annexuie P/I)and 24.10.2009 (Aiuiexure P/l-A) lias been pas^d witfaout asMgnmg anyreas<M ail3^^ theiTretua^sl^ttisNota^ with an oyeettd affoint a^ spersons^ a^ the duties ofNotary, Eeamed eouhsel fuither^sul»utsthat tfie d^ petition is sqnarely c<yvered fcythe;6alw pf fln»^^^^ passedmW.P.(C)Nb.; 5363/2(^9 (^«^^A^ V;;S(^ Others). ':' , :. ^' '•'.;'^;.::. 1. . • ::;. :-''1 .: The above fact has not beetf disputed by Shri Bhatia,^leame4 eounsel appearing fer ths StateA-espondent No. ll and ^2j.and lie^ subauts that fl^; instantpetiticmiiiaybedispose^txfmferffls^tlie^erpagsedjiitA&ft^^ Mishra(supra). :;. , ' • '''•.' .•:';': ., '•..' . :''i1' ::: -. '.; • In view of the submissipns made t% leaHied ccnuisel | for^ ttie paities and keepuig in view the stand of respeGtive paities in^ mstant petition,;^!^ is similar to t&at ofm tfae matterofA&ftaBani^JW&A^ petitionis aUowed Tlie impugned^rde^ .. and 24.l0.20t^'.(Aime3aire/'Bl^^l'aie,heieUy.quaslted.'.^^ are direeted te^cpnSiSer the^^^^e^ deeidetl]s:sameinaceordanee^^H^ \fef -!:::?;W~^^^^^ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge VSsiWU m»