IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12336 of 2010 1. KAMESHWAR YADAV @ JADAV 2. RAJENDDRA YADAV @ RAMANAND YADAV 3. DEO NARAYAN YADAV @ DEO NANDAN YADAV 4. JAY NARAYAN YADAV @ JAI NARAYAN YADAV 5. BISHANDEO YADAV @ BISHUNDEO YADAV 6. RAM BHAJAN YADAV 7. DHANESHWAR YADAV 8. MAHENDRA YADAV 9. RAMANAND YADAV @ RAM NANDAN YADAV. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02 10.05.2010 Heard both sides. This case reflects misuse of the privilege of the bail. Petitioners were made accuseds in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 307 of the Penal code which was lodged sometimes in the year 1994. Petitioners were privileged with bail in the year 1994. Thereafter they continued to appear before the Court till 13.05.2008, when, it appears, their bail bond(s) were cancelled as they defaulted in filing appearance. Petitioners surrendered on 16.03.2010, and since then they are in custody Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that now the charges have been framed. It is next contended that they shall fully cooperate with the trial. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.Court no. III, Supaul in connection with Sessions Trial 2 no. 176 of 1996 arising out of Triveniganj P.S.Case no. 84 of 1994, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioners. (ii) Petitioners shall appear in person on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance without their being compelling reasons therefor, the learned trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)