^ IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. V? /2011 (SI (FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.(S) No.l378_of20U ile Applicant Petitioner J^\ ^^ Smt. Neeta Kajve, W/o. Shri Santosh Kajve, aged about 46 years, ^ ^ R/o. L.I.G 1425, Veer sarwarkar \\\ _ V.> ^* Nagar, Heerapur, Tahsil and District 0 '^ Raipur (C.G.)^ ^v:-0:v ^'.\\ ^>^ '_^^" Nbtf^applicants : 1 Respondents Versus State of Chhattisgarh through Its Secretary, Department of General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) : 2) Collector, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) :3) Commissioner & Chief Censuses Officer, Municipal Corporation, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) :4) Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.fSI No.1378 of 2011 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION ON 14/03/2011 ^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BJLASPUR M.C.C.No.198of2011 APPUCANT/ PETITJONER NON-APPLSCANTS/ RESPONDENTS Smt. Neeta Kajve VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPLiCATION FOR RESTORATJQNOFWP^SlNai378/201[ SB: Hon'bSe Shrl Satish K, Apnlhotri,J. Present: Shri Chhagan Lai Sagar, Advocate for the applicant. Shrl A.V. Sridhar, Panei Lawyer for the State. fORALI (Passed on' 7ffi day of April, 2011) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the applicant does not v^ant to press this application (M,C.CJ, however, he prays that liberty rpay be granted to the applicant to file a better appSication, if so advised. 2. if Is ordered accordjngiy. 3. Consequently, the appljcation for restoration Is dismlssed, as not pressed with the above-stated Ijberfy, \'/ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun