IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2010 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1931 CRP.No. 1018 of 2007() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21/12/2006 IN EP.581/91 IN LAR.112/1985 of PRL.SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/JUDGMENT DEBTOR: ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.SHYSON P. MANGUZHA RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDER: ---------------------------- SUMATHIKUTTIYAMMA, D/O. PADMAVATHIAMMA, MATTATHINKAL VEEDU, CHAMPAIKKARA KARA, KARUKACHAL VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR FOR R SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR R SMT.GEETHA P.MENON FOR R SRI.NEELAKANDAN.P.M FOR R THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN I.A.NO.2898/2007 IN CRP.NO.1018/2007 DISMISSED. 8.3.2010 SD/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.1018 OF 2007 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2010 O R D E R State has filed this revision against the order passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Kottayam in the execution proceedings in L.A.R.No.112 of 1985 directing for deposit of balance sum of Rs. 3,36,320/- to satisfy the decree debt. The learned Govt.Pleader submitted that as per the statement filed by the State, the amount due was calculated as Rs.5,926/- and in the statement of the decree holder, the sum was shown as Rs.6,58,773/-. The court below without examining and ascertaining what is the amount due, has passed a single line order directing the State to deposit the balance amount of Rs.3,36,320/-. No reason is stated nor any statement made as to how the sum has been arrived is the submission of the learned Govt. Pleader. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent decree holder also conceded that the non-speaking order impugned in the revision cannot be sustained. Setting aside the impugned order, the court below CRP.1018/07 2 is directed to pass orders afresh after having a proper enquiry on the statements filed by both sides. Having regard to the fact that the decree passed was in respect of an acquisition which had taken place nearly three decades ago, I direct the learned Single Judge to give priority to the proceedings and make every endeavour to complete it within a span of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Revision is accordingly disposed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp