T.A. No.423 of 2008 .... Jyoti Sharma Versus Anil Sharma. .... Present: Shri Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. .... This is a petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the transfer of a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 filed by the respondent for restitution of conjugal rights in the Court of Amritsar to any Court of competent jurisdiction at Ropar. Both the petitioner and the respondent are present in Court. It has been stated by them that they have agreed to settle their differences. As a measure of settlement,it has been agreed between them that the respondent-husband shall pay an amount of Rs. 5 lacs as permanent alimony to the petitioner. He will also return the articles of dowry which have been specified by him as a double bed, sofa, central table, almirah, trunk containing mattresses, a brief case, another trunk, utensils, juicer- mixer and a press. It has further been agreed that the respondent shall pay the amount of Rs.5 lacs in two instalments and the first instalment of Rs.2.5 lacs shall be paid within one month from today along with the dowry articles and the other instalment of Rs.2.5 lacs shall be paid within a month thereafter. After the payment of first instalment and return of dowry articles, they shall file a joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 for dissolution of their marriage in order to put an end to the entire litigation pending between them. It has also been agreed that the petitioner shall have no claim against the respondent or his property in any manner after receipt of the aforesaid amount and return of dowry articles and after having separated from him. The child shall remain with the respondent as a part of T.A. No.423 of 2008 .... -2- general settlement. Both the parties have also undertaken that they shall not deviate from the terms of the agreement. Their joint statement to the above effect has also been recorded separately. In view the settlement between the parties, this petition is disposed of as infructuous. January 29,2009 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge