IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2011 / 23RD ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17639 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ T.S.JAYAKRISHNAN,THERAYANKODE HOUSE, EZHAKKAD,MUNDOOR.P.O,PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL, ALUVA-683101. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ALUVA, PIN-683 101. 3. SRI.ABDUL RAZAK,HOUSE NO.11/48, PUNNAKKATTU HOUSE,VADAVUKODE, KANGARAPPADY.P.O, ERNAKULAM-682 310. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.CHARISHMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.17639/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE REGISTRATION BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-7 BJ 5101. P2 COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT. P3 COPY OF THE FITNESS CERTIFICATE. P4 COPY OF THE WELFARE FUND RECEIPT. P5 COPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT DATED 21/11/2008. P6 COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 28/6/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.17639 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. Complaint of the petitioner is that respondents 1 and 2 are unnecessarily interfering with the dispute, which exists between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent in connection with transfer of a vehicle bearing registration No.KL-7 BJ 5101. 2. Learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 on the basis of instructions submitted that, the 3rd respondent had lodged a complaint before the C.I. of police, Aluva, regarding non-payment of the instalments due with respect to the finance arrangement of the vehicle, by the petitioner. In view of the complaint received, the C.I. summoned both the sides and the petitioner agreed to clear off payment of the defaulted instalments within a short period. On the basis of the course of action conceded by both the parties, the C.I. has closed enquiry on the petition and the parties were advised to abide by the 2 W.P.(C) No.17639 of 2011 arrangement arrived upon. It is submitted that the presence of the petitioner is no more required before the C.I. or before respondents 1 and 2 in connection with the dispute pertaining to the transaction of the vehicle which exists between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. 3. The above submission is recorded. Since it is conceded that presence of the petitioner is not required for purpose of investigation in connection with any criminal proceedings initiated, we are of the opinion that there need not be further direction issued from this Court restraining the respondents from interfering with the matter. The writ petition is closed accordingly. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/