IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4556 of 2010 MD.SARBAR @ MD.SERVER, S/o Md. Mustak. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 05.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 323, 406, 379/34, 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that after drugging the informant his bolero was looted by the miscreants. Subsequently two accused persons were arrested on suspicion who disclosed the petitioner’s complicity which led the investigating agency to the house of the petitioner from where the looted vehicle was recovered. In view of such I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, the prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively within nine months in view of the serious nature of the offence. For this reason, the trial court will resort to service of summons to the witnesses official and non-official through Sections 66 and 62 Cr.P.C. and also resort to cancellation of bail of the co-accused in case they are not appearing for reasons of misuse of bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)