IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 12949 of 2008 Between: B.Narasimha Reddy S/o.Ram Reddy R/o.Injapur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy East Division, at Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 3 The Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in trying to cancel the petitioner pata land in Sy.No. 247 an extent of Ac.1.10 guntas situated at Injapur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, along with title deeds as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner patta land in Sy.No. 247 an extent of Ac. 1.10 guntas situated at Injapur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRDADIRADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following Order: Petitioner states that he was assigned agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1.10 guntas in Survey No.247 of Injapur village in Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, vide proceedings dated 31-10-1965 by the third respondent, under a patta and on that basis, he has been in possession of the said land from a long time. Subsequently, the Mandal Revenue Officer issued pattadar pass books and title deeds. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the second respondent cancelled the patta granted in his favour, no proceedings were communicated to him so far and seeks appropriate directions in this regard. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that the land in Sy.No.247 admeasuring Ac.1.27 gts. situated at Injapur village is a “Poromboke Sarkari”, that no assignment was made to any individual, that the third respondent had erroneously issued pattadar pass books and title deeds to the petitioner in respect of the land in question and that the second respondent, vide proceedings dated 26-05-2008, cancelled the pattadar pass books and title deeds granted in favour of the petitioner. He further submits that he would supply a copy of the proceedings dated 26-05-2008 to the petitioner’s counsel by 26-06- 2008. In the circumstances, without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to supply a copy of the proceedings dated 26-05-2008 cancelling the pattadar pass books granted in favour of the petitioner. No order as to costs. ________________ N.V.RAMANA,J Dt:24-06-2008 usd