IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.109 of 2011 SIYA RAM SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 13.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that without proper verification of the stock and stock register of the P.D.S. shop of the petitioner, the Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 231 of 2010 has been registered against the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the authorities should have verified the stock and stock register by physical verification which admittedly was not done as it was alleged that the petitioner was absenting from the P.D.S. shop unauthorizedly. Learned counsel for the State submits that the matter is under investigation. Considering the submissions of the parties, it is directed that let the investigation of the aforesaid Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 231 of 2010 registered against the petitioner be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay. It is, however, made clear that the verification of the stock and stock register of the P.D.S. shop of the petitioner, if not already done, be done in presence of the petitioner. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be co- operating with the investigation while the verification of the stock and stock register is being made with respect to the P.D.S. shop of the petitioner. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)