IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3659 of 2010 1. ROSHAN KUMAR, SON OF LATE BHAGWAN LAL SAHU, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- SHIMRAHI BAZAR, P.O. RAGHOPUR, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. 2. LAXMI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE BHAGWAN LAL SAHU, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- SHIMRAHI BAZAR, P.O. RAGHOPUR, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. … PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY N.H. DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI (N.H.9). 2. THE ARBITRATOR-CUM-ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, SHASHI BHUSHAN PATHAK THE THEN ARBITRATOR, SUPAUL AND PRESENT IS MUSTAK AHMAD KHAN. …OPPOSITE PARTIES/RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioner: Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar-1, Advocate. For Opposite Party No.1 (U.O.I) : Mr. Shiv Kumar, (C.G.C.) For Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh (AC to AAG-1). ----------- 6. 20.05.2011 In compliance of my order dated 13.05.2011, Arbitrator, Additional Collector, Supaul is present and submitted that in compliance of the orders of the High Court dated 01.04.2010, he has considered the claim of both the petitioners under reasoned order dated 14.05.2011 whereunder for acquisition of Plot No. 1024 award has been passed but for Plot No. 1025 which has been acquired through consent agreement from Opposite Party No.2, award has not been payment for the said acquisition shall be paid to the petitioner no.2 directly by the National Highway Authority of India. In view of the reasoned order, award dated 17.05.2011 having been passed in favour of petitioner no.1, I am not inclined to proceed any further with this contempt petition, which is disposed of granting liberty to the parties to challenge the reasoned order as also the award dated 17.05.2011 in 2 accordance with law. Copy of the reasoned order and award dated 17.05.2011 be given to the petitioner. Ibrar/- ( V.N. Sinha, J.)