IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAW NO. 2324/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3111 OF 2009 (Ramesh Shikshan Sanstha & Anr. vs. Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Bhandara & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 15, 2010. Heard Mrs. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. Munshi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Shri Shende, learned counsel for respondent No.2. It is apparent that Respondent No. 2 has given wrong impression to this Court and because of that wrong impression, this Court on 11.02.2010 directed Respondent No. 1 to file appropriate affidavit explaining the position in this respect. Today, Mrs. Patil and Mrs. Munshi, learned counsel pointed out that Respondent No. 2 is not an ex- serviceman. Shri Shende, learned counsel states that because Respondent No. 2 has got previous experience with some other management, the word ex-serviceman was used. In the circumstances, I find that Respondent No. 2 has misled this Court. Writ Petition is already admitted. Application for Vacation of stay is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE *GS.