IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.545 of 2007 Date of Decision:- 18.1.2008 Jagdish Chander Phogat ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Ramanjit Singh, Advocate for Mr.Ashok Goel, Advocate. vs. Dr.R.K.Ranga, IAS ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Puneet Gupta, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner filed C.W.P.No.19077 of 2006 which was disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated December 11, 2006 with a direction to the first respondent to take cognizance of the representations dated 20.7.2006 and 10.11.2006 sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks. It may be mentioned here that the claim of the petitioner in the aforementioned representations pertains to his promotion and consequential posting. Alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid directions, this contempt petition has been filed. In response to the show cause notice, Dr.R.K.Ranga, MD, Haryana Warehousing Corporation, Panchkula has filed his reply/affidavit C.O.C.P. No.545 of 2007 -2- and along with the same, he has also appended order dated 21.5.2007 (Annexure R1/2) whereby the petitioner's claim as contained in his representations referred to above, has been disposed of. It appears that the petitioner's claim has been partly accepted. In these circumstances when the directions issued by this Court have been complied with by the respondents, nothing survives for continuation of these proceedings which are accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the aforesaid order before an appropriate Forum, if so required or advised. Rule discharged. January 18, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE