# ` \£-_r-i Serial Date Order with Signature OfficeNoteast'~og' _No. of of action (if any) Order Order taken on Order 04.'i\ 12.9.06/ Shri Dhirendra Bodo, an Under Trial i-` Prisoner, lodged in Rongyek LJail, East Sikkim petitioned tltis Court highlighting non-providing of certain basic facilities in the Hazats, which was treated as Public Interest Litigation.[2]OnJune07,2006thelearnedAdvocate General had apprised the Court of the steps for removing the deficiencies throughout the State S is being taken. The Court appreciated the attitude of the State and expressed hope and trust that the needful will be done by the State. The Court granted three months' time to expedite the matter.[3]Thechiefsecretary of the state has filed a report stating the works done in this regard supported by photographs.[4]Thelean?dAdvocate General took up stand before us that the State is committed toremc)vethedeficienciesandshallnotgive handle to anyone to ventilate grievances in regard to violation of t,he basic rights as lrY' No. of Order Order with Signature Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order Authority shall do the needful in the matter so that human rights as guaranteed under the Constitution of India is duly protected. In view of the above position, we afford three months' time to the State Respondent/Authority concerned, so as to enable the authority to expedite the matter and complete the necessary works for improvement of the `hazats' attached to the Court:s of the State in the interest of the public at large. : The matter be listed on 6.9.2006 for necessary orders. JLrfe i SerialNo.ofOrder Dateio:ier `,OrderwithSignature Office Note as toaction(ifany)takenonOrder I)iIIIIII guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.[5]Mr. A.K. Upadhyaya, a Senior Advocate of the High Court informed us that it is a fact that genuine attempts had been made but a Litigant shed and toilet facilities for the female litigants and/or Court Employees should also have been constructed in the premises of the Courts.[6]Mr.S.Joshi,anotherlearnedAdvocate of our Court pointed out the Government's failure in not making provisions in regard to disabled persons in the campus of the Courts though the Parliamentary Act mandates the Central Govt. as well as the State Governments to makefacilitiesatpublicplacesincl.udingjailforthe disabled ones. He highlighted that there is no facility of Ramp for the disabled ones in Courts.[7]ThelearnedAdvocateGeneralinregardto aforementioned grievances assures us that the Government shall do its best for removal of the Serial Date Order with Signature L|-OfficeNoteasto No. of of action (if any) Order Order taken on Order I'\ aforementioned grievances also raised by Mr. Upadhyaya and Mr. Joshi.[8]Expressinghopeand trust in the State Goveinment, we dispose of this Writ Petition. accordingly.[9jLetacopy of this order be handed over to the learned Advocate General for follow up action. CB;- L < (Binod Kumar Roy) Chief ustice(A.P.ubba) Judge