:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 860 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 860 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 860 OF 2004 Mr. Narayan Kundalik Ghuge. ... Appellant. V/s. Smt. Nandabai Mahadeo Mali & Ors. ... Respondents. .... Mr. Ramesh A. Karale i/b. Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar for the Appellant. Mr. Surel S. Shah for Respondents 1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. 13TH 13TH 13TH JULY 2007. JULY 2007. JULY 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The finding of both the Courts below is that neither has the agreement to sale of 10th October 1973 been duly proved nor has the Appellant established his possession. The Appellant claimed on the basis of adverse possession. The finding in paragraph 24 of the impugned judgment is that the plea of adverse possession has not been established. 2. The Second Appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed. -----