1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 1015/2011 & MCA ST. NO. 13497/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 241 OF 2011 (Dharmesh Keshav Patel vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. AUGUST 05, 2011. Shri Karmarkar, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Jaiswal, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 to 4. After hearing arguments as advanced, petition has been disposed of by this Court on 9th June 2011. Thereafter review is sought contending that a Government Resolution has not been looked into. The Scrutiny Committee is an independent quasi judicial authority and its exercise or discretion in the matter cannot be curtailed by any Government Resolution. We, therefore, find the case for review is misconceived. In this view of the matter, the application for condonation of delay as also MCA for review is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.