IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21574 of 2010 MD. HASIBUR RAHMAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Opposite party No.2, Mr. A. Rahman. Complainant’s second case is for torture for making of demand of Rs. 2,00,000/- or Sumo Car. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in earlier case, initially demand was shown for Rs. 40,000/- and a motorcycle. Parties compromised but according to the learned counsel for petitioner, casting Rs. 40,000/- for compromise rather petitioner was forced to undertake not to make any demand in future, there is further bargained by filing this complaint case for Rs. 1,00,000/-, which according to the learned counsel never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1646 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Purnia subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)