IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35474 of 2011 Munnu Kumar Jha, son of Bipin Kumar Jha, resident of village – Dullipatti, P.S. – Jainagar, District – Madhubani. ------ Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ******* 03. 17.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant who appeared suo motu and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Jai Nagar Case No. 124/2011, G.R. No. 1558/2011 for the offences under Sections 498A/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, is one of the named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission of Bar is that the couple intends to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with all due dignity, honour and care of each other and respective families. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of petitioner filing an application before the court below stating such intention/parties files joint petition of compromise and in the event of his arrest or surrender on or before 7th December 2011, let the above- named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, in connection with Jai Nagar Case No. 124/2011, G.R. No. 1558/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled, further additional condition in case of filing individual petition on behalf of the petitioner the court below on getting positive response from the complainant or filing joint petition of compromise permit the parties to reside at their place of choice and report personally on the date fixed for the purpose and only after being satisfied of their conduct for a reasonable period court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)