WPMS No. 922 of 2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri N.C. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner and perused the record. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the impugned order dated 01.02.2008 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in the interim maintenance application No. 37 of 2008. Brief facts of the case are that on 01.02.2008 an application under section 125 Cr.P.C. along with interim maintenance application was filed before the Principal Judge, Family court, Dehradun wherein the court below directed that petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- per month as an interim maintenance. Feeing aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner preferred this petition before this Court for setting aside the aforesaid order of the court below. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Principal judge, Family Court, Dehradun without giving any opportunity for filing objection and hearing, decided the interim maintenance with is against the law. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the impugned order, I do not find any force in the submission raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. The Principal Judge, Family Court held that in order to survive the applicant/respondent and in the interest of justice, the court below awarded maintenance @ Rs. 2,000/- per month. Perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the court below provided opportunity to the petitioner for filing objection and after hearing of the parties, the court below shall consider again on the maintenance amount. I do not find any merit in this petition. The petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J.) 06.06.2008 ASWAL