IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 5468 of 2009(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SYAM JESAN, 28 YEARS, (PARTY-IN-PERSON) 10TH SEM, LLB STUDENT S/O.SIDHARTHAN, R/A.V.V.P.HOUSE MANGALAM PO., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.SYAM J SAM SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY PO. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATINS UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE BARTON HILL, KUNNUKUZHI PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. FOR R1-2 ADV.SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 5468 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated, this the 9th day of June , 2009 J U D G M E N T Proceedings taken by the University with respect to malpractice committed by the petitioner in the course of prosecuting the 4th semester LLB Examination has been challenged by him in this writ petition. It seems that the petitioner had a note pad with him while appearing in the examination and the malpractice prevention squad detected the same. The petitioner was asked to appear before the Standing Committee on Students Discipline. He submitted an application Ext. R1 (a) which reflects that he admitted his guilt. The syndicate has prescribed the punishment of debarring for 6 to 8 chances in the case of malpractice in the course of examination. The Standing Committee of the syndicate conducted an enquiry and decided to cancel the petitioner's examination, and then permit to appear again WPC. 5468 OF 2009 : 2 : in October, 2008. While so he was granted provisional registration for the 5th semester and 6th semester, pending finalization of the enquiry. On enquiry, he was found to be guilt, and the provisional registration was cancelled. In the present situation therefore, the petitioner will have to pass 4th, 5th and 6th semester examination. In the result, I do not find any reason to the prayers made in the writ petition. 2. It is for the petitioners to participate in further examinations as directed by the University. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) jma