In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM-M 28155 of 2009 Decided on 14.10.2009. Iliyas -- Petitioner vs. State of Haryana --Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.N.K.Sanghi,Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) The petitioner has applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') in case FIR No. 227 dated 26.6.2009, registered under Sections 323,324,326 IPC at Police Station, Nuh, District Mewat. As per the FIR, in the occurrence dated 17.6.2009, the petitioner is alleged to have caused injuries on front side of head of Arshad with a fursa (sharp edged weapon) According to the police report, a fracture was detected on the head of Arshad having been caused by the petitioner with sharp edged weapon, on the basis of which section 326 IPC was added. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that according to the complainant, the occurrence took place on 17.6.2009 whereas the matter was reported to the police by Tahir Hussain on 23.6.2009. There is no plausible explanation for delay of six days. CRM-M 28155 of 2009 -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the assertion of the complainant that Arshad was given a fursa blow within his sight on his head by the petitioner which resulted into a fracture, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present bail application is hereby dismissed. 14.10.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge