RSA Nos.4543 of 2005 & 3205 of 2004 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision: 10.07.2009 1) RSA No.4543 of 2005 Sewak Ram ...Appellant VERSUS Sohan Singh and others ...Respondents 2) RSA No.3205 of 2004 (O&M) Jasminder Singh and another ...Appellants VERSUS Sohan Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the appellant. *** AJAY TEWARI J. This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondents challenging the sale deed dated 05.01.1994 executed by the appellant. The second appeal (RSA No.3205 of 2004 (O&M) has been filed by the vendees. Both the Courts have held on fact that the principal had died before the sales were made in favour of the vendees-defendants. RSA Nos.4543 of 2005 & 3205 of 2004 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the appellant has not disputed this factual position. The substantial questions of law proposed by learned counsel for the appellant are:- “Whether the Special Power of Attorney in favour of the appellant come to an end with the death of Ram Parakash, as per Section 202 of Indian Contract Act?” I find that this question is considered in the correct perspective by the Courts below and held against the appellant in view of the judgment in the case of Rajinder Kumar v. State of Punjab 2002(4) RCR (Civil) 666. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to show any contrary judgment to me. Consequently, I hold the questions of law proposed against the appellant and dismissed the appeal. As regards RSA No.3205 of 2004(O&M), I find that my judgment in this appeal would entirely cover that case also and thus the same also dismissed. No costs. As the main case since has been disposed of therefore all the pending civil miscellaneous applications in the case also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) July 10, 2009 JUDGE ashish