IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.32037 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 4, 2010 PARDEEP LUTHRA ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. Ms. Vertika Singh, Advocate, for respondents 2 & 3. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for quashing of FIR No.53 dated 9.4.2009 under Sections 353, 186, 332, 342, 295-A, 148, 149, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sadar Kapurthala (Annexure P-1), on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 contends that although the compromise deed dated 11.4.2009 (Annexure P-2) was executed, however, the petitioner has not complied with his part of the compromise. The petitioner was required to deposit Rs.2,50,000/- in addition to subsidy with the Bank on 17.4.2009, against a receipt, amongst Criminal Misc. No.32037 -M of 2009 2 other conditions. The petitioner did not make the required deposit and, therefore, there is no compromise and the matter cannot be settled on that basis. In view of the statement given by the learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3, this petition is dismissed. February 4, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?