\-r>' ai^i^r l<;-)i* Sf^S Sft+lich^f?tT + TE? -'<l''(lcra, ®fl1<H'is.Ici<ni'My sn^r xnra? 11*ICTI g)»j|q,-'—"—————————^F^ 200 !§ 'l^qST"""""""""""""""' 3IT^[ WIIW ^lf??T w.fl PBTITIONER Vs RB^PONDENTS 1. f.R. Dansena, age 61 years, son oflate ^hri Ramji Lal Dansena, retlred Head Cplerk, O/o District Education OfEicer, ^urajpur, District Surguja (CG) ^tate of Chhattisgarh, fhrough lecretary, School Education t))epartment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. ihawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Ipistrict Education Ofilcer, Surajpur, Ipistrict Surguja (Chhattisgarh) (Petition U/ Single Bench; Hon'ble M '|A 226 of Coastitution oflrtdia) t-. Justice Dhu-eadra Mlshra 10.12.2008 Shri S.S. Rajput, co| Shri Paakaj Shrivas) The inatter is listed Leamed counsel foi filed syuopsis on 5.12.20^ ofAnnexure P-2, which y 8 of the petition. He pra^ durm.g the course of fhe Prayer is aUowed. default during the course Heard. chi<<F<n<i1f ^m^il' "^ f^l<il <f»('^.i< ^; 3if:gii sn^i .[S]RR.6328/2008 |uiisel for fhe petitioners. i|tava, Paael Lawyer for the State. [on default. fhe petitioners subioits fhat he has ah-eady p8 aad fhe ofher default pertauis to fhe date .^s wrongly nientioued in sub-para 8.4 ofpara [^s for pennission to rectiiy fhe above default d|ay. The petitioner is permitted to rectijy fhe |offhe day. ••! .. .—.. .-. . ^^ [TT^tfe^f -F 'isgs"^. jXI-HC-22 'tff -'° .)«' 3D^[q^ f^iitft ^rr^i sti+lich ^tt^d ^5? -^Wld'4, ®fl1wis,I'Ktl'My sn^r XR^T *ll*lf(T ai*liq> 200 g> fq^^T' SIT^I'Rarw?ift?[ 7 By the iastartt petLtion, higher pay scale/tiine scale w.^ Annexure P-1 issued by fhe Statd Leanaed counsel for fhe pressia^ fhis petition at fhis stag No.2 be directed to decide fhe r| tliespeci&ed period in fhe Ught o| On fhe ofher hand, the representatiou ofAnnexure 6 weeks from. the date In view of the above parties, the instailt petition i^ respondent No.2 to decide the 4 petitioner, in. accordaace with la[ P-1, wifhia a period of6 weeks copy of ttus oi-der. leamdd of receipt/^iroductiou of copy sub <Di<tI<n'lfli*f1^d?'^^l<:1 <.f^i^T< ^aipgiTsn^i pie petitioner is claiming benefit of j.f. Ist April 2006 as per Cn-culai- of Govemment. petitiouer subnuts fhat he is not te on inerits, however, the respondeut ipreseatation of Annexure P-2 wifh.io. Circular of Anuexure P-1. couusel for the State subniits that i]>-2 shaU be decided wiftun a period of 'lproductiou ofcopy offhis order. iiuission of leamed counsel for the disposed of with direction to fhe jepresentation of Annexure P-2 of fhe {v, ia fhe Ught of Cu-cular of Annexure froia the date ofreceipt/production of Judge