., PETITIONER (a @ EWiiiLE BEMM IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT O HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( O. ééqll 2011 IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; BETWEEN / Nehru Nagar Residents Association A society duly registered under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Societies Registration Act 1973, having its registered office at Community Hall, Post Office SAF Line, Bhilai, Tehsil Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, thr .ugh the/W, General Secretary, Shri Anil Shukla, son of Shri S. P. Shukla, aged about 46 years, resident of Block 64—A/4, Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh w VERSUS 1f” State ofChhattisgarh, throughthe Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Bhilai, through the ‘ Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Office, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA' FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND FOR ISSUANCE OF OTHER SUITABLE WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS Amit "r‘ H? "%H C0? ERT OF CHHATFISGARH AT BU ASP} J‘R ‘NRH‘ PWN'I‘YON (T3 N0. 6642 of 2011 Nehm Nagar Residents Associatiun‘ VER SI ES State 0f Chhaltisgarh & Anether. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON S.I.I.X.UI.ION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Amrito Das, Advocate for the petitmnen Shri M.I’.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate far the State. Shri Manoj Faranjpe‘ Advocate on behalfofShri Sah/awan Agrawai, Advocaté: fur the respondwi No. 2‘ 0 R I) E R gPassed on 14‘“ day QfNevember, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for The petiiimer submits mat The: representation maee before the Seeretary to me Government of Ckilamsgarh Urban .Admimetratiim 8a Developmem‘ Department is pendmg since 07.062009 (Aimexure W9), ihus, the reSp-‘mdeni auihorities may be direcied f0 decide the said reyreseniation, as ezqoeditieusiy as possible. Chri Bhatia. learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 submits that if fhe repreeentaiion of the petiticneri as aforestate¢ is pendiiig consitieration: the same shaii be censidered and decided in accordance with law on its awn. meriis and perspective, as eariy as pessibie, preferably within a period of four weeks. in View of the above, according to ieamed counsei appearing for the petitioner. nothing survives in this petition for adjudication Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. I,“ f/f- WWW Sdl— GNIHOTRI ; SATISH K- AN Judge PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,...