IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23559 of 2010 LOKESH KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.23424 of 2010 BHUSHAN PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in jail since 14.03.2010 in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that till 28.02.2010 Rs.70420/- was balance in the account of the informant but between 01.03.2010 to 02.03.2010, Rs. 70041/- was withdrawn. During investigation, it has come that the money was withdrawn by use of Internet and from that withdrawn money the Laptop was purchased. During investigation, the petitioners’ name sprang up. Subsequently the petitioners confessed also. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is neither recovery of Laptop nor any money has been recovered from possession of the petitioners. It is also submitted that there is no cogent 2 material to connect the petitioners with the crime. Learned counsel for the State, Mr. Dashrath Mehta, submits that during investigation the petitioners’ complicity has surfaced. Considering the fact that the petitioners’ name sprang up during investigation and have remained in custody since 14.03.2010 and investigation is complete, let the petitioners, Lokesh Kumar Sharma and Bhushan Pandey, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bettiah, in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 73 of 2010. It is made clear that the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners if the petitioners fail to appear on three consecutive dates or if the petitioners get themself involved in similar nature of case. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)