1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7308 OF 2010 1. Sushma d/o Bhujangrao Walke, Age 34 years, Occ. unemployed, R/o C/o Smita G. Patil, Prabodhan Nagar, Mendhi Farm Road, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai, District Beed. 2. Kiran d/o Ramchandra Jambhulkar, Age 36 years, Occ. unemployed, R/o C/o Kanchan Dhanvijay House of Babasaheb Dhanve, Prabhudatta Nagar, Mendhi Farm Road, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai, District Beed. 3. Rakhi d/o Sakharam Kakade, Age 35 years, Occ. unemployed, R/o C/o Nayana Nagorao Choudhary, BH-5-8, Vikas Colony, Sakri Road, Dhule, Taluka and District Dhule. 4. Sunanda d/o Ghansham Dambhare, Age 36 years, Occ. unemployed, R/o C/o Sunil Anandrao Joshi, Near Mahadeo Wagh, Dhande Galli, Beed, Taluka and District Beed. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Directorate of Medical Education & Research, St. George's Hospital Compound, Government Dental College Building, 4th Floor, Near C.S.T., Mumbai - 1. ... RESPONDENTS 2 ..... Shri V.P. Golewar, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondents ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 18th August, 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V. HARDAS, J.): 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioners by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India pray for directing respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners, dated 19.1.2010. Since the petitioners have only prayed for the aforesaid relief, we are inclined to decide this petition finally at this stage. 3. Since the representation is said to be pending, which has been made pursuant to the reliefs granted to others, on account of judicial orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.6412/2006 and Writ Petition No.6372/2008, we allow this petition and direct respondent No.2 to decide the said representation, if pending, in accordance with law, and communicate the decision 3 thereon to the petitioners. 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (P.V. HARDAS, J.)