WP(C) 1440/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Ms P Chakravarty, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr S Dutta, t he learned counsel for the respondents-bank. The petitioner has taken recourse to Article 226 of the Constitu tion of India alleging that the appeal filed by him on 07.03.2011 before the Deb ts Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati, which was filed within the period of limitation was not entertained by the Registry of the Tribunal on the ground that prior not ice of 30 days to the respondents was required to be served before placing the a ppeal before the learned Presiding Officer, which was not done by him. I have pointedly asked the learned counsel for the respondents-b ank as to whether there is requirement of giving 30 days notice upon the respond ents-bank before placing the appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the respondents-bank fairly and frankly submits that no such requirement is env isaged under the law. If that is the case, I fail to understand under what circu mstances and for what reasons the appeal was not accepted by the Registry Tribun al. The learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that, as the petition er is able and ready to liquidate the entire loan amount outstanding against him within two months from today, the petitioner should not be regulated to that Tr ibunal and the writ petition be disposed of by directing him to liquidate the en tire loan amount outstanding against him and by directing the respondents-bank t o withdraw the case and not to press the impugned order dated 04.03.2011. As I have admittedly no jurisdiction to entertain this writ peti tion, the course of action proposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner ca nnot be accepted. Nevertheless, the petitioner should not be denied of his right to file an appeal against the impugned orders dated 17.01.2011 & 04.03.2011. Resultantly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati within two days from to day. The Debts Recovery Tribunal shall entertain the appeal of the petitioner in accordance with law and shall also dispose of the stay application within 10 da ys in accordance with law without any delay. Needless to say, a copy of the application for stay being filed by the petitioner will be furnished to the respondents-bank within a day from th e date of filing the application. No cost.