IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39311 of 2008 NAKUL TIWARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 19.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is alleged throwing a kerosene lamp upon the deceased when his attempt to commit rape was found unsuccessful. She received burn injuries, taken to hospital but could not be provided better treatment and returned back to her parents’ house, and thereafter died. This information was given by the father, who might receive better information, may be eye witness of several occasions as against it, some information was given on behalf of father alleging therein that it was the father who was behind the burning of his daughter, as there was some money and ornament to be returned to the deceased. So it cannot be said to be contradictory information rather the later informant was a person having only imagination or suspicion. In that view, the doubt raised on behalf of the petitioner, on the above point, is not liable to be sustainable. Finding the direct allegation, petitioner’s prayer for bail is rejected. The court below is directed to expedite the case. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI