K3^RT i\ :^- c^ c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.fS) N0. ^3W/2009 PETITIONER .^^T ^.•%^"""" ^y^' ^•••"' ^^ ^y ?<0~^ RESPONDENTS 1--:1. G.L Dadsena, S/.o. Late Shri R.L. Dadsena, aged about 65 years, Retired Lecturer, R/o. Clubpara, Near Water Tank, Mahasamund, Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Schooi Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Mahasamund, Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA "-'2. ^ HIG_HCOURT_OF_CHHATT.ISGARH,iB!LASEUR WRiT_PETmON1.SlN0^5377_OF20Q9 PETmONER G.L. Dadsena RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petitjon under Article 228 of the Constitutlon of Indla) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ramakant Pandey, counsei for the petitioner. Ns Sunita Jaln, Panel LavA^er for the State. QRDER (ORAL) (Passed on thls 18tn day of September, 2009) Learned counsei appearing for the petitloner, on instructjons, submlts that the petltioner seeks permlssion of this Court to withdraw thls petltlon with libety to make a representation before the respondent-authorities In the light of declslon of this Court rendered in Moharsial Rathore & Others vs- State of Chhattisgarh 81 Others , to whleh learned counsel appearing for the State has no objectlon. 2) It is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordlngly, the wrlt petltion Is dJsmlssed as withdrawn 'wlth the aforesaid iiberty. — ———- — Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Gowri Judge WP No.18 of 2003 (decided on 27-3-20085