IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-7817 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: 22.07.2011. Navdeep Kaur and another ……Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …...Respondents Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Vivek Slathia, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajni Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. B. S. Sewak, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 6. L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) Reply on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed today in Court by learned State counsel is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Copy given to the opposite counsel. Along with reply, statements of both the petitioners recorded by the police have been annexed. Petitioners have stated therein that they do not want any further action to be taken in the instant petition nor they require any security. Heard. In view of the aforesaid statements of the petitioners, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 22.07.2011. A.kaundal