if-f[€rvl^ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.5^^ /2006 PETITIOMER ^O./.f^ ..-•* ,^yyy ..-•""' o' •v^ .^^y ^zc^>'" ^; ,'s" RESPONDENTS : 1 Smt. Ishwari Pandey ^- W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey Age about 40 years, Asstt.Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Kanki, Block-Tilda, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- • ...J t; HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESeARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 5623 of 2006 PetitEoner ; Smt. Ishwari Pandey Versus tespondents ; State Sovt. of Chhattisgarh & W- P. (S) No. 5624 of 2006 PetEtioner ; Ku. Sushila Verma Versus tespondents : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh W. P. (S) No. 5625 of_2QQ6 Pet! Petitionei 'v wndenTs r'v'eer] Ku. Shahena Par Versus aspondents ; State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh W. P. (S) No. 9626 of 2006 er Kespondents Rajendra Prasad Soni Versus State Sovt. of Chhattisgarh W. P. (S) No. 5627 of 2006 Tok Sinqh Verma Versus State ffovt. of Chhattisaarh W. P, (5) No. 5628 of 2C tamgopa! Chaturvedi Versus State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh W. P.(S)No. 5629 of 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Saidhya Sharma Versus tespondents ; State fiovt. of Chhattisgarh W. P. (S)No. 5630 of 2006 Petitioner : Rakesh tespondents State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5631 of 2 Lakhan Lal Patel State Sovt. of Chhattissarh & another Petiti espondents *i W. P. (5) No. 5632 of 2006 Ku. Jeera Padhyay Versus State Sovt. of Chhattisgs And W. P. (S) No. 5633 of 2006 Sagar Ram Dahariya Versus State Sovt. of Chhattisqarh & another Sinflle Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastaya, Advocate for 1+ie Petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, 6ovt. Advocate for respondents/; ORDER th October, 2006) 1 ILearned counset cypearing for the petitioners submits that while working as Assistant Teachers.'rtie petitioners have gone on training to improve their qualifications on thejr expenses and acquired B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate. 2. Tlie preant writ petittens, being W.P.(S) Nos. 5623/2006, 5624/2006,5625/2006,5626/2006,5627/2006,5628/2006, 5629/2006, 5630/2006, 5631/2006, 5632/2006 5633/2006 invotve simtlar facts and common question of !aw. Thus, these petitions are being disposed of by this common irder. 3. According to fearned counse! for 1+ie petitioners, 1+ie petitioners are entitled to two advaice increments in view of the decision of tiiis Court in the case of yashvwnt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munjcipa! Corporation, &urg and ano1+ier {2006 CEI) AAPJR-C6 96). This Couri- in the case of Yashwant Kumar j Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another ^' (Supra), came to the conciusion that the teachers, who obtained B.Ed./B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his expenses, are covered by ihe circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovernment of Mttdhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners -fzirther submits that the £^ff*' ucts and question of !aw involved in the present cases are jUarely covered by decision of this Court in tiie case of Yashwant famar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Dun and another (Supra), to wnich learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment le oeti 5. AccordingSy, the wrlt petitlons are allowed In terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipsl Corporation, Durg and aiother (Supra), subject to verification of the fcct as to whether the petitioners hav'e acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Cert-ificate on their ixoenses or not. No order Subhaffh A copy of this order be placed on record of ottier connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge