IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930 RFA.No. 248 of 2003() --------------------- OS.223/1999 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS: --------------------------------------- 1. GEETHA JOSE THOTTAM, WIFE OF T.C.PAUL, AGED 44, V.P.8/548-A, SREEVALSOM, PIDARAM, VILAVOORKAL VILLAGE, PEYAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. T.C. PAUL, S/O. ACHACKO, AGED 52, RESIDING AT DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS: ------------------------ 1. RAJAMMA HARI, W/O. LATE HARI POTHEN, T.C.27/441-1, 'ANJALI', GAS HOUSE ROAD, KUNNUKUZHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. AZAD HARI, S/O. LATE HARI POTHEN, RESIDING AT NO.66, ASMA MANSION, THAMPURAN MUKKU, KUNNUKUZHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PARTNER, KULATHUNKAL AUTOMOBILES, M.G. ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ASHOK HARI, S/O. LATE HARIPOTHEN, T.C.10/348 (1), 'DWARAKA", BALAVIHAR LANE, OPPOSITE TO HINDUSTAN LATEX, PEROORKADA, TRIVANDRUM, PARTNER OF DO. DO. 4. AJAY HARI, S/O. LATE HARI POTHEN, RESIDING AT TC 27/441-1, ANJALI, GAS HOUSE ROAD, KUNNUKUZHI, TRIVANDRUM, PARTNER OF DO. DO. -2- R.F.A.NO.248/2003 5. AJITHA ANIL, D/O. LATE HARI POTHEN PARAVAMPARAMBIL, METRO STUDIO, ERATTUPETTA, PALAI. 6. PRIYA VARGHESE, D/O. LATE HARI POTHEN, A-9, R.P. APPARTMENTS, PUHEN ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-01. BY ADV. SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN FOR R2 SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN FOR R2 SRI.SAIJO HASSAN FOR R2 SRI.A.S.SABU FOR R2 SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL FOR R1, 3 TO 6 SMT.MANJU RAJAN FOR R1,3 TO 6 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A.NOS.1460/2003, & I.A.NOS.2898, 2899 & 3040/2007 ---------- Dismissed 24/6/208 Sd/- P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. Sd./- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JJ. ------------------------------- R.F.A.NO.248 OF 2003 & I.A.NO.2507 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Raman,J. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for partition claiming 2/3rd right over the plaint schedule property. The suit was dismissed against which the appeal was preferred. During the pendency of the appeal, parties had entered into a compromise on the terms agreed upon and formulated in tge the petition I.A.No.2507/2008. It is prayed that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the compromise. 2. Accordingly, the judgment and decree passed by the court below is set aside and the decree is passed in terms of the compromise. The compromise petition be annexed along with this judgment. Appeal is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge. kcv.