IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 30TH APRIL 2009 / 10TH VAISAKHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1430 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.165/2002 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, PALAKKAD ST.2289/1999 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, PATTAMBI .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONER --------------------------------------------------- ABDUL HAMEED, S/O.KUNHIMOIDEENKUTTY, EACHARATHUVALAPPIL HOUSE, KAVUKKODE AMSOM, PATTISSERY DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.C.DILIP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. NARAYANAN NAIR(DIED), S/O.AMMU AMMA(DIED), MADAMPATH PUTHEN VEEDU, KAVUKKODE AMSOM, CHALISSERY DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 3. RATNAVALLY, W/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, MADAMPATH PUTHEN VEEDU, KAVUKKODE AMSOM, CHALISSERY DESOM, THANNEERKODE, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 4. REMA, D/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, MADAMPATH PUTHEN VEEDU, KAVUKKODE AMSOM, CHALISSERY DESOM, THANNEERKODE, OTTAPALAM TALUK. 5. LATHA, D/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, MADAMPATH PUTHEN VEEDU, KAVUKKODE AMSOM, CHALISSERY DESOM, THANNEERKODE, OTTAPALAM TALUK. ADV. SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD) FOR R3-5 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. AMJAD ALI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 1430 OF 2009 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 30-04-2009 ORDER The accused in S.T. No. 2289 of 1999 on the file of the J.F.C.M. Pattambi, for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 4324 of 2009 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.