HIGH COURT OF CMHATriSGARH AT BiLASPUR IVI.A.No.41(»2002 SB: Hon'bte Shri Justice R.L. Jhanwar APPELLANT (NonAppIicantNo.1) Amrit Lat s/o Lakhantal Sirmour aged about 24 years, By caste Satnami, R/o vidage Khajri, PS : Khairagarh, Tehsil: Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon (CG) (Non applicant No.1 in the Court below) k""»i»k Versus RESPONDENTS 1 Smt. Diteshvrari Bai w/o Late Surendra Appticants Kumar aged about 25 years, 2 Ku. Menin Bai D/o Late SurenGtra Kr. Ag^l about 7 years, 3 Ramvitas s/o Bhuvan Verma, Aged about 55 years, 4 Smt. Tijiya Bai w/o Ramvilas»Aged about 50 years, The respondent No.2 is a minor and therefore, through her mother Dileshwari Bai. All residentsofviftage Ditippur, Tehsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon 5 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Branch Manager, Kamthi Line, Rajnandgaon (Non applicart No.2 in the Court below) MISC. APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTORVEHICLE8 ACT Appea^ince^ Ndyie for^ie appetlant. ; No^e for r^spondents No. 1f/to 4. Shri\3.S.Patet, counsel for ^espondent No.5. ^>RALORDEil (10.11.2010) The case was calted out for hearing frMce, but on both the occasions, ncme appears for the appellant nor any representation ismade, Since there is no representation on behaff of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeat for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- R.L. Jhanwar Judge