IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 5382 of 2008. Decided on: 9th August, 2010. _________________________________________________________ Sita Ram Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. O.P. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Mr. O.P. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his relief only to the benefit of counting of adhoc/tenure service rendered by the petitioner followed by regularization for the purpose of increments/pension. He has given up the relief No.-7(b). 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner as far as main relief is concerned, as per the ratio of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh. The needful shall be done within a period of six weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 9th August, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.