IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9324 of 2002 RAGHUBANS DUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 12.02.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The claim of the petitioner is for appointment on a Class IV post in pursuance of his working in the Rohtas Collectorate since 1991 as an “Ummidwar Anuseak”. The designation itself IS indicative of the nature of the appointment as being contrary to law. In any event of the matter no panel can have a life beyond one year. The relief sought is based upon a panel of 1999 in s writ petition filed in 2002. Any panel to be prepared for appointment has to be in consonance with Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India by open advertisement and proper selection thereafter. If the respondents publish any advertisement and the petitioner applies in response to the same, quite naturally his case is also required tobe considered in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)