} f -g’ The grievance of fhe pefiiioners, in nu‘rsheli, is Tha‘r in farms of Annexurzs P/8, P/9 and P/12, which are circular insfrucfions issued by fhe undivided Governmen‘l‘ of Mudhya Pradesh, fHe pe‘fifioners ough? To have been given employment being 'i'he ousTees of 'i'he ac‘quired’ iands. 2. The claim of ‘ihe pei’i‘i’ioners is noi well-founded. Admi‘H‘edly, fhe land of The pe‘iilioners was acquired way back in fheyeor 1984. All The Three documem’s, on ‘ihe basis of which ihe relief is sough'l', come in'ro exisfence offer acquisi'iion 'of i'he pefi'fioners‘ lands. Secondly, Annexure P/8 unmisiakubly would show 'i‘ho'i 1'he benefi'r in fhe said circular could be availed of by ‘ihe ous'iees if only rheir lands are acquired for mining purpose and no? for any ofher public purpose. The circulars on which reliance is placed would noi' show ‘rha'f ‘l'he benefi'r under fhose documen'is is available 1’o ‘rhose ousiees whose land was acquired prior To ihe da‘i’e of fhose circuiars. Looking from any angle, 'l’he relief sough'l’ in 'ihis wrif pe‘l'ii'ion is misconceived and canno'i' be gran'fed. {3‘ The wrii' pe‘ii'iion is dismissed. Sdl- Chief Justice