IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2825 of 2008 JIUT PRASAD & ORS Versus GYAN CHAND PRASAD & ORS ----------- 06. 12.05.2009 I.A.No.6183 of 2008 has been filed for condoning the delay in the filing of the MJC petition. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the interlocutory application, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown due to which this MJC petition could not be filed earlier. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed and the delay in the filing of the MJC petition is condoned. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This MJC petition has been filed on behalf of the appellants- petitioners for restoration of S.A.No.255 of 1990 which was dismissed for default on 08.07.2008 as no one appeared on behalf of the appellants when the case was called out for final hearing. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the MJC petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown which prevented learned counsel for the appellants from appearing on the aforesaid date. Accordingly, this MJC petition is allowed and S.A.No.255 of 1990 is restored to its original file and number. If otherwise ready, let this second appeal be placed for hearing on 22nd June, 2009. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)