IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45007 of 2008 DILIP PASWAN @ RAJU PASWAN, Son of Late Hari Paswan alias Sidheshwar Paswan, Resident of Mohalla- Murli Hill, Station Road, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya :---- Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR:----Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Uma Kant Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ==== 3. 08.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 395 of the Penal Code which is lodged against Kamlesh Paswan and 10-11 unknown accused persons. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been implicated in this case in the extra judicial confession of named accused Kamlesh Paswan, whereafter he was put on Test Identification Parade and is said to have been identified by the informant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he having been identified by only one witness during the Test Identification Parade should be admitted to the privilege of bail. I am not inclined to do so as his antecedent is also not clean since he is accused in a case registered under different Sections of the Arms Act. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected, however, considering the fact that he is in jail custody with effect from 20.06.2008 it is directed that the case (Magadh University P.S.Case No. 13 of 2008) be committed to the court of Sessions forthwith, if not already committed and thereafter trial be expedited and concluded at an early date. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)