- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Appeal No.835 of 2000 In Suit No.842 of 1977 Sheela Rani Sharma, Wd/o.Dr.Rupnarain Sharma & Ors. .. Appellants Vs. The Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay & Ors. .. Respondents -- None for the appellants. Ms V.K.Chaudhary for the respondents. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 25TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None present for the appellants. Shri Chaudhary, the learned advocate present for the respondents. 2. On Friday last when the matter came up for hearing, none had appeared for the appellants. Shri Chaudhari, the learned advocate was present for the respondents. Consequently, the matter was dismissed for default. However, after some time, Shri - 2 - K.K.V.Kurup, the learned advocate, appeared before us and requested to take up the matter while contending that he was held up in another court when the matter was called out, and while accepting his request the order of dismissal for default was recalled and the matter was taken up for hearing. However, the matter could not be concluded as the said advocate had to attend another court in contempt matter against the advocate himself. The matter therefore was adjourned to this date. 3. When the matter was called out today, none has appeared for the appellants. Shri Chaudhary, the learned advocate present for the respondents. 4. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for default. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J) ( D.G.KARNIK, J)