IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6910 of 2009 Between: 1 Smt. G. Rajeshwari, W/o. late G. Narsimloo, R/o. Bomraspet (V&M), Mahabubnagar District. 2 Kum. G. Priyanka, D/o. late G. Narsimloo, R/o. Bomraspet (V&M), Mahabubnagar District. 3 Md. Muneer Uddin, S/o. Khamruddin, R/o. Bomraspet (V&M), Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar. 2 The Station House Officer, PS Bomraspet (V&M), Mahabubnagar District. 3 Abdul Rahman, S/o. Saheb Hussain, R/o. Bomraspet (V&M), Mahabubnagar District. 4 Abdul Hameed, S/o. Abdul Sattar, R/o. Bomraspet (V&M), Mahabubnagar District. ..... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. N.ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in implementing order, dated 15.04.2005 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2005 in I.A.No.199 of 2003 in O.S.No.54 of 2003 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kodangal, as illegal and arbitrary. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.2-G.Krishnaiah, Sub-Inspector of Police, Bomraspet Police Station, Mahabubnagar District, he inter alia stated that he assumed charge as Sub-Inspector only on 02.03.2009; that as of that day, the petitioners did not approach him with any representation for police protection and that if there is any violation of the order passed by the Civil Court, the police are always ready and willing to provide police protection to implement the order of the Civil Court, provided the petitioners approach him with a proper representation. Having regard to the stand taken by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Bomraspet Police Station, Mahabubnagar District, as referred to above, the petitioners are given liberty to approach the former with a written representation to enable him to take appropriate action for due implementation of the order of the Civil Court. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.9037 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 30th June, 2009. Kl/kvni