1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD) No.10655 of 2011 A.Raja @ Nallayamperumal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Joint Director, (Secondary Education), Directorate of School Education, Chennai. 2.The District Education Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 3.Sri Krishnaiyyar Higher Secondary School, Chinnamanur, Theni District, rep. by its Secretary. ... Respondents (R3 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 23.11.2011 made in M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner's dated 29.12.2010 and 05.01.2011 and pass orders on merits. For petitioner .. Mr.P.Natarajan For respondents 1 & 2 .. Mr.R.Anandharaj, Government Advocate ORDER (Order of the Court was made by K.N.BASHA, J) The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for the relief of a direction to the first and second respondents to consider his representation dated 29.12.2010 and 05.01.2011 and pass orders on merits. 2.By mutual consent of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandharaj, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing, at the admission stage itself. 3.In view of order which we propose to pass protecting the interest of the third respondent, we are of the view that no notice need be sent to the third respondent at this stage. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though a representation has been given by the petitioner as early as on 05.01.2011, the same has not been considered by the first and second respondents till date and as such the petitioner has been constrained to approach this Court with the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. 5.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents, on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 6.In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner herein, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.01.2011 and without expressing any view on such representation, constrained to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.01.2011, by affording opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the third respondent and other relevant parties by sending notice, and to pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a fresh copy of the representation, dated 05.01.2011, along with the order copy of this Court, to the second respondent, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Court. 7.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Writs) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Joint Director, (Secondary Education), Directorate of School Education, Chennai. 2.The District Education Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. gcg Order in W.P.(MD)No.10655 of 2011 23.11.2011 TR : 09.12.2011 : 2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/