IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2008 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1930 RPFC.No. 2 of 2004() -------------------- MC.350/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, MANJERI .................... REVISION PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT : ---------------------------------------------- PRASAD, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA MENON, H.S.S. ROAD, NILAMBUR AMSOM, DESOM, P.O.NILAMBUR BY ADV. SMT.K.V.RESHMI RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER AND STATE : --------------------------------------------- 1. PRASEEDA D/O. GOPALAN NAIR, CHAKKAMMATTU HOUSE, POOKKOTTUPADAM, NILAMBUR TALUK. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ----------------------------------------------- R.P.(FC). No. 2 OF 2004 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of June, 2008 O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner asserts and the learned counsel for the respondent accepts that the claimant, the respondent herein , has subsequent to the impugned order got re- married. The date of re-marriage is not specified. It is agreed that after the date of re-marriage the respondent is not entitled to claim any maintenance from the petitioner herein, her divorced husband. Till the date of such divorce, she will certainly be entitled for maintenance. In view of the subsequent admitted marriage of the claimant the petitioner does not press this revision petition. This RP(FC) is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner, needless to say, can take steps to cancel the impugned order on the ground of re- marriage. R. BASANT, JUDGE ttb B.A. No. OF 2008 2 B.A. No. OF 2008 3 B.A. No. OF 2008 4