1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11074 OF 2010 *** Ajaykumar Bahadursinha Gujar and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11074 OF 2010 *** Ajaykumar Bahadursinha Gujar and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. *** Mr. Dhananjay M. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D. R. Korde, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. D. Reddy, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the petitioners have an alternate remedy for redressal of their grievance. Having confronted with this, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of their 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11074 OF 2010 *** Ajaykumar Bahadursinha Gujar and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. grievance within a period of four weeks from today. He prays for continuation of ad- interim passed by this Court on 8th December, 2010. He further submits that if they file proceedings before appropriate forum same may be directed to be considered on merits and without entering into an issue of limitation. The learned counsel for the Respondents has no objection for granting the liberty and direction to decide the main proceedings on merits in accordance with law. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as prayed. Ad-interim order granted by this Court on 8th December, 2010 to remain operative for a period of four weeks from today. If the petitioners file any proceeding challenging the revision of their pay scale along with 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 11074 OF 2010 *** Ajaykumar Bahadursinha Gujar and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. the application for condonation of delay within four weeks from today, same may be considered on merits in accordance with law after condoning the delay in filing the main proceedings. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not examined merits of the case. [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.] Dated:20/06/2011. ans/11074