IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA TUESDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2011 / 25TH SRAVANA 1933 SA.No. 1024 of 2001() -------------------------- AS.419/1998 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR OS.1125/1997 of II ADDL. MUNSIFF COURT, THRISSUR .............................. APPELLANT(S): -------------------- 1. M. NALINI, W/O LATE MOHANAN AND D/OTHIYYADI NARAYANAN NAIR, PULLAZHI, TRICHUR. 2. ASWATHI, - DO – MINOR AGED 9 YEARS 3. ISWARYA, - DO – MINOR AGED 6 YEARS. MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR GUARDIAN AND MOTHER, THE FIRST APPELLANT. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. RADHA ALIAS AMBIKA, D/O KODUVELI MALATHI AMMA, KILLANNOOR, TRICHUR. 2. MALATHY AMMA, D/O KODUVELIL DEVAKI AMMA, KILLANNUR, TRICHUR. ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sou. K. HEMA, J ---------------------- I.A. No.1236 of 2011 and S.A.No.1024 OF 2001 ----------------------------------- Dated 16th August, 2011 J U D G M E N T This appeal is filed by defendants in a suit for money. 2. A petition is filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC stating that entire amount due to the plaintiff/first respondent is paid and the plaintiff - first respondent agreed that she will not claim any amount based on the appellate decree (ie., for realisation of Rs.40,000/- with interest at 12% from 6.1.1997 till the decree and thereafter at 6% till realisation). The compromise is recorded. In the light of the compromise, appellate decree is treated as satisfied. This appeal is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- K. HEMA, JUDGE. Sou. // True copy // P.A. to Judge.