IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14512 of 2003 YASODA KUMARI @ YASODA DEVI, wife of Shree Sheo Balak Prasad Verma, resident of village Dhangawan, P.S. Narhat, District Nawadah ... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The District Magistrate and Collector, Nawadah 3. The Child Development Project Officer, Narhat Block, District Nawadah 4. Sunaina Devi, wife of Ram Sworup Prasad, resident of village Dhangawn East, P.S. Sitamarhi (Narhat), District Nawadah ... Respondents ----------- 3. 29.10.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. This Court on perusal of the pleadings in respect of the relief prayed by the petitioner for quashing the appointment of respondent no.4 on the post of Angan Bari Sahaika would find that the respondents have explained in their counter affidavit, copy whereof was served on the counsel for the petitioner on 4.1.2006, wherein it has been not only stated that the appointment of respondent no.4 was made in terms of the resolution passed by the Aam Sabha but also that the petitioner herself was not entitled for such appointment on the post of Angan Wari Sahaika, inasmuch as she happens to be the wife of a dealer of Fair Price Shop. There is no denial to this aspect by the 2 petitioner by filing any rejoinder to the said counter affidavit. That being so, this Court must hold that the challenge of the petitioner towards appointment of respondent no.4 is wholly misconceived and accordingly, this writ application being devoid of any merit is, hereby, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/