(1) ca25-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2011 Gurunath s/o Shantilingappa Chingunde APPLICANT VERSUS Sharanappa s/o Limbu Panchbhai and another RESPONDENTS .... Mr. Pravin S. Patil advocate for the applicant. .... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 18th AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. 2. The suit of the appellant/applicant for grant of perpetual injunction was dismissed with costs by the Trial Court and the same was confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Therefore, in the present application for staying the effect and execution of the impugned decree, there remains (2) ca25-11 nothing worth executing, except the order regarding the costs. In the circumstances, the application is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] NPJ/ca25-11