'i- / c^^^^7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnS6ARH AT BILASPUR K.6.) W.P. (S) No. /2Q11 PETTTmNER RESPONDENTS <yv .•••"'\ "..^"^^.y >''\^t~ ,..-•"' ^y>"' Virendra Kumar Kunjam, S/o Late Pardeshi Ram, aged about 22 years, R/o Village- Badeguda, Kunjampara, Tahsii and Oistt. Oantewada (Bastar) (C.6.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Tribai Welfare Oepartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department, Datewada, Oistt. Oantewada (C.6.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Triba) Welfare Departme&t, tSantewada (C.G.) WRTT PETTnON UN&ER ARTECLES 226 OF TI-E CONSTTTUTION OF IN&IA ^^ ^si -^ww^, »Tiiy4is,l^cTCI^? v.:.f:.s..'t...^.a-i/.1.'.. s^\ StI^I 'W f<;-fi<<> W!13ITOI sh'il'n 1; sn^i xraw (^?t3^T) SB ; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICfe PRITINKER DIWAKBR Shri A. K. Patil, counsel Shri N. N. Roy, P.L. for| Gnevance of the petiti| Pardeshi Ram who was worl for the petitioner. Ithe State. loner is that his father late cing as assistant teacher in Tribat Welfare Departmertt died According to the petitioner father he was only 9 yea majority he orally requested ^t the time of death of his |-s old and after attaintng respondent No.3 for giving him compassionate appointrfient but the same has not been granted. Learned counsel for t^e petitioner fairly submits that no formal apptication petitioner seeklng compass because the village where tjhe petitioner is restdlng is severely naxatlte affected ar)d the life of general public of the sald vlllage ls mlser< petitloner may be permittetf to withdraw this petition with liberty to fite proper ap|3licatlon before respondent No.Swho in turn may be di of the. petttioner sympathet limitation. «b[iiiy(4i-iwich' <f fyS •(Rif<<;i< ^isiRnsn^i 21.08.1997. has been made by the onate appointment mainly ble. He submits that the t'ected to conslder the case jcally ignoring the polnt of '•(K'li-l—FS/I40—2/30' I--1.50,000. ur'.^^,'%. ss^^^'^ ^ "•'l&;-it-;^i^ ^ '"•^^ ^ "•'<'aus.a<y XI-HC—78 -s^ ^pn^r, s^ftTw?, t^rey .^l'.^:.'...^.^.l.tl.. Ife Sh^ TSBW(to 311^1 at Learned State petitioner flles an appti He.. however, submits would be decided strictl^ of the Government. Accordingly the pre| a direction to the petit before respondent No.3i and in the eventuality ofl same would be decided accordance with law months. It is made ctear any opinion on the meritts concerned woutd be at in accordance with law coi|nsel has no objection if the ti4ation before respondent No.3. the ca^ of the petittoner in accordance with the policy thfet ft''if'fyA 7fW?R ^ >ent petition is disposed of with tidper to flle a proper apptiGatlon Iwlthin four weeks from today filing any such appticatton the |by the concerned authority In wjthin a further period of four rt this court has not expres^d of the case and the authorlty berty to decide the application due scrutiny of the facts. aifter Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge 1