@ r 2. Regular CrA(PR)No 3745/2011 has been preferred on behalf of present appellant Rameshwar along wrth other appellants against the aforesaid onvrctlon Shn R R Sonl learned counsel for the appellant In CrA (PR)No 37451201 1; , submits that after taking instructions he has tiled the same ' 4. Consrdermg the appeal fled on behalf of appellant Rameshwar & other In Cr. A. (PR) No. 37451201 1, present appeal Is dismissed as unnecessary .y :5. Let copy ofthis order be placed in Cr.A.(PR)No.3745/201 1. v w Sd/— T.P. Sharma Judge ,1 ‘ Sd/- 1 J ~~ ‘ R.N.Chandrakari_ Z Judge \njay . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.«.:,I~: DIVISION BENCH: 2‘ Coram: HON’BLE MR.T.P.SHARMA& ¥ HON‘BLE MRRN. Chandrakar, JJ; r Crlmmal Appeal No 375 of 201 1 Appellant Rameshwar S/o Late Sonu Pahadl Korva (In Jail) aged about 45 year$ R/o Pampapur Gajarbhavana (Harraghat) Thana - Danma, Dlstt Sarguja (C'.G.) we Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh,-‘Through —uPoiicew Station Darima Distt’.-Sarguja (CZGJ‘ (CRMINAL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 374 (2) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973) Present:- , ‘ ShriSamirSihgh.counse|forthe appeIlanL V u Shri J.A. Lohani, Panel Lawyer for the State. ' ~ ORAL JUDGMENT (Passed on 12‘“ July, 201 1) h Per T.P.Sharma, J.:~ 1. Present appeal has been preferred against judgment of convictien & order ei “sentence dated 23.03.2011 passed by the 4‘“ Additional Sessions Judge l (FTC), Ambikapur, Distt.-Sarguja, in Sessions Trial No.31 4/2006 through legal aid.