1 (Wp 3173 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3173 OF 2010 Mr.Satish S/o. Ramvilas Pandey ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.A.M. Saraogi for Petitioner Mr.D.R.More -APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED:26TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned APP for the State and the Respondent No.2, who is appearing in person. 2. This petition is filed for quashing a complaint filed by the Respondent No.2 against the present Petitioner for the offence punishable under section 143, 146, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 323, 427, 504 of the Indian Penal Code registered by the Respondent No.1 at the instance of Respondent No.2. 2 (Wp 3173 of 2010) 3. Parties have now amicably settled the dispute. The Respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit stating therein that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed since the dispute between the parties is a personal one and the Respondent No.2 has no objection if the complaint qua the Petitioner is quashed. Both the Petitioner and the Respondent No.2 are present in the Court. The Respondent No.2 has informed this Court that he has no objection if the complaint against the present Petitioner is quashed. 4. In view of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Jagdish Chanana vs. State of Maharashtra [AIR 2008 SC 1868], Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab [ AIR 2008 SC 1969], B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana [AIR 2003 SC 1386], the complaint can be quashed qua the present Petitioner. 5. Writ petition is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) qua the Petitioner only and is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)