FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6034 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 11091 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Shri. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ghule Patil, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Though respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are served, none appears for them. Shri Ghule Patil, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4 submitted that the applicant has not explained the delay properly. No case for condoning the delay is made out and the application may be rejected with costs. On the other hand, Shri Kulkarni, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the impugned judgment and award was passed on 30.12.2008. Against that decision, the applicant had filed review petition which was withdrawn on 30.4.2009. In the meantime, the application for certified copy was made on 20.1.2009 and the certified copy was delivered on 22.1.2009. After hearing counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. In the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. For the reasons recorded in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "C" with no order as to costs. (R.G. KETKAR, J.) Date:19.11.2009. rlj/