1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2117 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 2382 OF 2008 1. Vinod S/o Shambhuram Sewak and another.. Applicants Versus 1. Baban M. Sase and another .. Respondents Shri P. D. Sawant, Advocate for Applicants. Shri P. P. Bafna, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 01ST OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : . This is an application for condonation of delay. Heard Shri Sawant, lerned counsel for applicants and Shri Bafna, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. The respondent No. 1 though served is absent. It is stated that the applicant No. 1 is not in a position to maintain and manage the whole family. According to him he was under bonafide impression that there is no further remedy and because of the same he did not contact the advocate 2 earlier. Thereafter, after collecting the amount for court fees he could prefer present appeal. Shri Bafna, learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance Company resists the application on the ground that the grounds stated are not sufficient, however, for the reasons enumerated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. The civil application is disposed of. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Oct. 10