0 ^ .-fc1 INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) H31 W.P.No./^^ 7200$ PETITIONER Shrimati Urmila St\tawan.aif\e^^>w\-ii3fe»e^^ >^<fc'^oT'J^s~^Y"^ut'^7s^<uv •,u:.f?^^ ~^0^:(~C,^'.^«^'fsw'v^'ry' VERSUS ^^^~1 6^ 1>^^ RESPONDENTS ...!• 1. The State of C.G. Govt. of Chhattisgarh l.-^'P^- ...' ^ Through the Secretary, \^-7"/"v'.?li'"'"".'.-""""'" -1.","''°^"."' ''""""'•" •••'""'^'%.-"'°""' School Education Department Ministry, ?p ^?i;y^'" D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Kanker (C.G.) 3. Principal, Higher Secondary, PURUR Distt.-Durg(C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF IUIANDAMUS ERTIORARI. PROH1BITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLEWRIT/WRITS. )ER/ORDERS. AND DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. HI6H COURT OF CHHATraS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.No. 1884 of 2006 Petitioner : Shrimati Urmila Shrawan Versus Reqwndents : The State of C.6. and others SB: Hon1»leMr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. Ajay Shrivastonfti, advocorte for the petitioner. Mr. Satidi Supta, beputy Sovemment Advocate for Respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on -this 1st t>ay of Februory, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well ois for the State/respondents jointly submit •that the f<icts of •the present writ petition are similar to thoit of in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & onother vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further submit that the questton of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the pari-ies, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 9.10.2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharnia & another vs. State of Chhatti^arh & others). No order as to cof Subhash Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge