1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16783 of 2011 P.M.SHANMUGAPRIYA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI.(CR.NO.71/11) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.P.S.PALANIVEL RAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. R.RAMACHANDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 409 of IPC in Crime No.71 of 2011 and seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the sole accused and she has been falsely implicated in this case on the allegation of misappropriation of Rs.3,64,495/- while she was working as a clerk in the Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai and the petitioner is nothing to do with the allegation. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation that she has misappropriated a sum of Rs.3,64,495/- and the investigation is pending. 4.The fact remains that the entire allegations are bone out by records and documents and considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall be available for interrogation before the respondent police as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. K.P.S.PALANIVEL RAJAN Advocate SR.No.44763 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16783 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 TR : 22.12.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/