^^^l'tlliitoM^^-' presentedby ShFt..K.^'.-^K'-'-<-"— (iated.....2^(.2"te •JQ ^ B^i BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH ftOURt OF CHHATTISGARH AT BlLASPUR (C .G.l W.P. N0. S'l 19 /2005 ^w!sss^ ?^^ 'riVSTi'f, PETITIONER ^ DR.ANJALI KASHYAP Aged about42 years D/o. Shri J.L.Kashyap Assistant f3rofessor ( Political Science ) Qovernment Girls College, Dharntari Tahsil & Distt. Dhamtari ( C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1 STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ^- Through : Principal Seeretary Higher Education Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur( C.G. ) 2 PRINC^IPAL t^ 3. Government Girls College Dhamtari ( C.G.) SHRI J.L. PATIL Assistant grofessor ( Spciology ) Govt. Girls College Dhamtari ( QG) -^4. SHRI R.K.AGRAWAL Assistant ProfessQr ( Ecdnomics ) Govt. Girls Callege, Dhamtari (CG). PRINeiPAL SECRETARY ^5. Cultural EduGation and Tourism Govt. 6f Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ( CC3 ) BH // 2 // WR 1 T PETITI©N U NDER ART 1<SLES 226/2270F CONSTltUtlON OF INDIA XI-HC-22 ^e W^I^i . Ri-ii.'ti.ani?! </ ?t-><-f <lfsn B—«i, 1^^ /.^ ir^ ^^-'<l'41d4; »ill<H^is, RKli'yy sn^ ^y tfiiwi sbNrai ^\o)(^r" ........,.,..^ 'fN^T' a<l^l gWIW^fe *»>Nlfl^rT •tWl^lf ^ J^^1 <Fti^l< : ^'5flf:W3Ilta ! . S-12-2005 Shri V.G. Tammkar, eouasel fo^ tlie petitioner. Shri Vivek Shamia, Fanel Lawy Heard. ' Counsel for the petitioner subitiits that the petitioner has been transferted fi-om Govt. Girls CoBege Dhamtari tO.Crovtl she is the oidy lady teaehmgj'olitical ^r for fhe Stote, on advanee cdpy. College, Bemetara. Counsel further submifs ttiat scierice in fhe Govt. Girls College, Dhamtari and she was alsp working on the projectoffadies N.S.S. and'fhe instructiohs are'fhattheworK should be done by a lady only and th^re is no lady except petifioner ivailable tfiere. He furttier submits fhat fhe transfer has h^en ittade during ban penod. He fiirthei subnutted that earlier a lepresentation was submitt| Havil^ considered and withoutj ;dby the petitioner. . • ' ^ ^•••- • . • - • • . ' •. . - expressmg Sty opimon pn flie merits of flie case, .1:^..- .... - • . ...! .. 1';."•.'-.;. ^.:.'&-1'- iri tfae opimoa of this Court, endg of justice wiU be served if a direction is giveri to the petitioner to mate a detail^ represen|ation raisiag hCT grievances before.^ no. 1 alohg wifli a copy of tfae pefifioi|i and this order within 15 days.&omtodayaitdon; such Tepresentation being ffled, the re^pondent :No. 1 shaU decide the same on its^ own merits in accordance wrth law as eariy|as possible preferabfy within two mnntfaslrom tfae date of reeeipt of the representatipn. ft is made cfear (hat if any arieyance remaiils, fhe' petitkinertnayayailtheremedKaYaflabteunderthelaw. '^ Counsel further submifa that tl^e petitioner has not been refieved and she may N aUowedto coiitumetill.fhe decision ofltterepresentation..' . ' , ^' , • & is directed that if the petitic|ner has tiptbeen reUeved, she may be aBowed'itja^ contmuetiflttierepresentationisdecid^d.' . • . - . , • . • . >Witfrtfaeafbresaidpbservatk)tls[l:hiSpetitiQn^tandsdisp6sedo£ Consequentty M.W.P.Nb. 4SJ57720Q5. and I.A. No. 10115/2005, also.stands^ disposedo£ s Certified copy as per rules. Fakhruddin Judge