( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2007 Nissar Abdul Hamid Zari .. Applicant. Versus Swami Swaroopanand Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd. & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.D.Brijesh i/b.M/s.Khandeparkar & Associates for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, A.P.P. for respondent No.2 State. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 2nd June, 2008. DATED : 2nd June, 2008. DATED : 2nd June, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.D.Brijesh for the applicant, Mr.Dedhia, learned A.P.P. for the State. None for respondent No.1 though served. 2. For want of prosecution, Revision Application No.226 of 2007 came to be dismissed on 18.7.2007. Hence this application is made for restoration of the Revision and for setting aside the order dated ( 2 ) 18.7.2007. 3. I have heard learned Advocate Mr.D.Brijesh and Mr.Dedhia, learned A.P.P. for the State. Respondent No.1 has remained absent though served. Paragraph No.4 of the application mentions that the Advocate for the applicant was not well on 18.7.2007 and hence he could not appear before the Court and that the Revision came to be dismissed. 4. In view of the reasons set out in the application, I am inclined to grant this application. Hence the order :- a) Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). b) Order dated 18.7.2007 is set aside. Revision Application No.226 of 2007 is restored to the file and posted for admission on 16.6.2008. 5. Application for restoration accordingly disposed off. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)