IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 215 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 31 OF 2010 DR. SHYAM MURTI GUPTA ... Applicant Versus MR. ELI FURTADO ... Respondent Ms. Susan Linhares, Advocate for the Applicant. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 29th October, 2010 P.C.: Heard Ms. Susan Linhares, learned Counsel on behalf of the applicant. 2. Invoking Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and relying on the decision of Didigam Bikshapathi & Anr. V/s. State of A.P., reported in AIR 2008 SC 527, the applicant herein seeks the review of the judgment of this Court dated 19/07/2010 on the basis of a document (i.e. a bus ticket) which was sought to be produced by the respondent but was not allowed to be produced because of the objection of the applicant. 3. In my view, such an exercise is impermissible in law, in view of Section 362 of the same Code which provides that no Court when it has signed its judgment or final order disposing of a case, shall alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. 4. After referring to several decisions of the Apex Court in the case of M/s. Venus Steel Products V/s. Michael Francis Pinheiro (deceased through LR's) & anr. (2005 ALL MR (Cri) 2753), it has been held by this Court that the High Court has no power to recall or review its own order. 5. Application therefore is hereby dismissed in limine. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH