C.R.No.3737 of 2011 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.3737 of 2011 Date of Order: 1.6.2011 K.H. Hotels Pvt Ltd .....Petitioner Vs. Krishan Kumar and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner-defendant K.H. Hotels Pvt Ltd by filing the present revision petition has approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution praying for issuance of directions to the learned trial Court to decide its application for interim injunction in the counter claim filed by him in a suit for permanent injunction instituted by the respondent-landlord. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner, who is a tenant in the demised premises on the basis of lease deed dated 17.2.2010 being constrained to deposit a monthly rent of Rs.5,80,000/- per month whereas the respondent-landlord is not complying with his corresponding obligation to grant/sign/execute the necessary documents for renovations in terms and conditions of the lease deed. He submits that the necessary permission/directions for carrying out the renovations in the demised premises are being denied by the Estate Office, Chandigarh in view of such non-compliance by the respondent-landlord. It is further submitted that in the counter claim (P.4) praying for decree of mandatory injunction for C.R.No.3737 of 2011 #2# executing documents for renovation of demised premises, an application was instituted on 29.3.2011 under Section 151 CPC for issuance of necessary directions, however, the respondent-landlord on one pretext or the other is delaying the filing of the reply thereby causing hindrance in early disposal of the said application, which is now fixed for 6.6.2011. Accordingly, the prayer is for direction for early disposal of the aforesaid application in the counter claim. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, in my opinion, no such directions can be issued to the learned trial Court as there is nothing on record to substantiate that there is any privy of learned trial Court in delaying disposal of application. However, it is hoped that the learned trial Court shall decide the application expeditiously in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. June 01, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE