$~30. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1685/2006 SHOWMAN CONSTRUCTIONS & IMPEX PVT.LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Arun Batta, Advocate versus SHRI RAJINDER CHHABRA AND ORS. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Pradeep Diwan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anupam Dhingra, Advocate & Mr.Abhishek Chhabra, Advocates Mr. Tamali Wad, Advocate for the applicant in I.A. No. 1435/2016. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI O R D E R % 05.04.2016 I.A. No. 1435/2016 This application has been moved by counsel for the defendant to seek discharge. The application is allowed. Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the defendants. He states that Vakalatnama shall be filed during the course of the date. The application stands disposed of. I.A.No. 2859/2015 The parties had agreed to arbitrate their disputes and differences. This agreement is contained in the order dated 03.04.2007 when a retired Judge of this Court was appointed as the sole Arbitrator. The arbitration proceeded before the learned Arbitrator, however, he has recused in the matter. Accordingly, I appoint Justice S.N.Dhingra, a retired Judge of this Court, as the sole Arbitrator to proceed with the arbitration. The parties agree that the Arbitrator may be paid a fee of Rs. 50,000/- per sitting, to be equally shared by the parties apart from all other out of pocket expenses. It is ordered accordingly. The parties shall appear before the learned Arbitrator on 03.05.2016 at 4.00 p.m. The office report shows that two awards have been received, however, in fact, no award has been rendered by the erstwhile arbitrator. The record of the Arbitrator received by the Registry has not been sent to Court. The same be sent to the newly appointed Arbitrator without any delay in a sealed cover. The learned Arbitrator shall proceed from the stage at which proceedings were standing when the matter was before the erstwhile Arbitrator. The application stands disposed of. VIPIN SANGHI, J APRIL 05, 2016 sl