IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. (SS) 4808 of 2001 Mohd. Ayub …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ….Respondents Present : Mr. I. P. Gairola, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for the respondents. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. I. P. Gairola, Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner is a civilian employed in the Indian Military Academy. He has raised a service dispute before this Court. However, Ms. Anjali Bhargava representing the respondents has made a preliminary objection that the matter is cognizable at the first instance by the Central Administrative Tribunal, more particularly in view of the constitution Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India and others AIR 1997 SC 1125. Writ petition is therefore liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy and is hereby dismissed as such. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 12.10.2011 Kuldeep