IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7289 of 2011 Manpreet Singh Vs. National Fertilizers Limited, Gohana Road, Panipat & another Present: Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has approached this court with a grievance that there are no medical standards laid down for the job for which the petitioner was offered appointment, which has been withdrawn on the ground that he is suffering from colour blindness. In fact, the present writ petition is a second round of litigation filed by the petitioner. During first round, the grievance of the petitioner was redressed by directing his examination by a medical board, which was constituted by PGI, Rohtak. On the basis of this report, the petitioner has not been again offered appointment on the ground that he is having infirmity in his vision. The counsel says that the respondent-NFL is acting with bias to deny this appointment. Otherwise, the petitioner is not suffering from any defect and in fact will be able to perform the functions of the job. It would not be for this court to see as to what medical standard would be the requirement for the job and it would be known to the respondent-NFL. As to what medical standards would be needed for a person to meet while making his appointment would also be known to the employer. The petitioner has then prayed that his medical examination be got conducted from PGI, Chandigarh. In my view, the petitioner has been given enough opportunity and has been examined by independent expert at PGI, Rohtak. The process must come to an end, which cannot be continued by directing his medical examination at his instance at one place or another. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in exercise of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. April 27, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE