IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 535 of 2011 (M/S) Smt. Anita Bangari ………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………Respondents. Present: Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 4. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.(Oral) Heard Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 4. Mr. B.D. Upadhyay, Advocate appearing for the Kumaon University has given a statement at the Bar that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed inasmuch as she has been permitted to appear in the Counseling—a fact which has been admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 25.3.2011 Rathour