IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3966 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision: October 14, 2009. Neeraj Kumar ...Petitioner(s) v. Mohan Lal & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri J.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the appellant/applicant. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): In this case, respondents No.1 to 3 are not being served. As per the Office report, the addresses furnished by the appellants were not correct, however, the applicant/appellant moved CM No.21124-CII of 2009 before this Court submitting therein that the addresses furnished by him were correct and the respondents No.1 to 3 were deliberately evading service. On the basis of the aforesaid averments, vide order dated 14.9.2009, the appellant was allowed to serve the respondents by way of dasti process at the addresses given by the appellant for today. Vide aforesaid order, it was also made clear that it will be the responsibility of the appellant to serve the said respondents. Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/appellant is at a loss to inform the court about the service upon the respondents, which was to be effected by dasti process only. Since the appellant has failed to serve the respondents, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. October 14, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge