1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2360 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2360 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2360 OF 2004 Subhash Bhansali & Ors. ..Petitioners V/s. Satyanarayan Sodhani & Anr. ..Respondents. ----- Shri S.A. Vaidya for Petitioners. Shri K.V. Saste, APP for Respondent No.2-State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 30, 2004 DATED : NOVEMBER 30, 2004 DATED : NOVEMBER 30, 2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard. The argument canvassed before this court is that ingredients of sections 504, 506, 427 read with section 114 of IPC are not made out even if the allegations in the complaint are accepted as it is. I see no substance in this submission. The complaint will have to be read as a whole. On reading the complaint as a whole, prima facie case is made out. In paragraph 4 onwards, the background is set out and the incident in question is grafically described in paragraph -8 of the complaint. As mentioned earlier, if the complaint is read as a whole, I am satisfied that prima facie case is made out. No fault can be found with the order of the court below in the fact situation of the present case. Hence, dismissed. 2 .....