s^f.-' ws ;:; ^ ^\^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 381 of20W Nandlal Gupta, S/o Shri Baijnat Prasad, aged about 41 years, R/o Village" Sapnadar, Block Maiapat, Ambikapur, District Surguja(C.G.) VERSU8 :: : 1) State of Cfahattisgarfa, llu-ough Secretary, Depafiinent of School Educatioii, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raip%(C.G.) '^ 'vd' 2) Cliief ExeciMive Officer, Jaiipad Paaichayat, Ta, 'Ssrrf-Ui-l'i.s'i Mainpat, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3) Seeretan;', Gram Paiieliayat, Saptiadar, Sitapur, Distri.ct Surguja (C.G.) 4) Assistant Dff'ector, Irispector of Mainpat, District Surguja (C.G.) 5) CoIIeetor, District Surguja (C.G.) 6) Director, Rajiv Gandhi Prathuuk Slriksl Mainpat, Distdct Surguja (C.G.) 7') Chief Executive QfSeer, Zila Paachavat. istrict surguja (V.u.) WRIT PETm'ON UNDER ARTICLE 226 Oi? THE CONS'n'I'UTTON QP INDIA ^•i./-'\ Hii nai SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish 'K. A!emhQtri,_J, Sliri S.K.^viis^u-a, Par 4.5, forflieState/re /p 22°rdiiyof Jmuary, 2008) No. 1, 08.04.1997. the getitioner was selected as Shiksha Karmi (Bal Baiwadih. She subnrits that even after selection aud commiimcation made to fhe petitioner, the petitioner was not given She also submits that one post is still vacant inthe but whenever fhe petitioaer makes contact with the autborities ofthe State, thev do not give anv satisfactory reply to him. </ 4. +/ iK^ Btfii 2 ^A 2. For the present, teamed eounsel for 'fc.e petitioner makes a lanited prayer that tiris petition may be disposed of with a direction petitioner to file a representation before the concemed aufliority concemed authority may be directed to dispose ofthe representation opposed bv leamed couasel for the State. The praver is allowed. It is directed Ihat if so advised, the pstitioner representation feefore fhe concemed autbority within a period of three weeks from today alongwith a copy ofthis petition and if sucfa a representalion is fiied, f* Sit tH" Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit