iT^« * y»TV SHK. >T] 'T"' iged a Shri Arcfaaaa Tirkv-, (After ;e-Smt. Archana Ekka), about 41 years, wife of La5 Ekka, Upper Division Teacher, Govemmen Boys Higher Secon; School-Dharamjaigarh, Distric Raigarh (C.G.) of Cht through-Secretary, Department of Scfaooi Education, Dau Kalvao (C.G.) 2. District Education OfScer, District Raigrh (C.G.) Ire.^ Present: Mr. A.N.Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for tfae State/respondents. ¥- (Passed 0112m ofApril, 2007) 1. The auestion of law involved aereic as to whether the •-! petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f the date of mitial appomtment or from the date of comnletion of Di'obation rseriod, u^. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for ?nts iomtlv submit that the facts question oflaw involved in the present writ.petitioa are the same as to that of in W.P.fS) No. 5473/2006 fRakesh inother Vs. State of Clihattisgs Others), wliich was disposed of vide order 9.10.2006. 3, In view ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. ¥- Sd^ ,.• Satish K.Agmhotn -. Judge ^'