WSsa»g> ^^y2^ ).. , ^. -..- -":^'^%...--"' -^:^^:^^'"" y<°*" ....•'::""' ^aVed..-- —•^lU.t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D'^on Bench WritAppealNo. .^^<=~ OF 2009 APPELLANT (Petitioner, In writ Petition) RESPONDENTS: 1. (In writ petition Dr. S. Zahiruddin, aged about 51 years, S/o Late Shri Hazi Rahimuddin, working as Assistant Veterinary Surgeon, Posting Block - Bakawand, District - Bastar, Jagadalpur, R/o Gayatri Nagar, Dharampura Road, Jagadalpur, District - Bastar (Chhattisgarti) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Veterinary Medical), Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Director, Department of Veterinary Medical Services, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector, South Bastar, Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) 4. A.P. Dohre, Assistant Surgeon, Veterinary, Addl. Charge, Depyty Director, Veterinary Services, Dantewada, District-Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF SUB - SECTION (1) OF THE CHUATTISGARH HIGH COURT fAPPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT, 2007 .^as"- .•f" H6 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W. A. No. 256 of 2009 AppeUant Dr. S. Zahiruddia Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & ofhers WRITAPPEALUNDER SECTON 2 (1) OFTHE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEALTO DIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 DB: Hontile Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'ble Mr. Prashaiit Kuiiiar Mishra, JJ. Shri. Saadeep Dubey, Advocate for the appeUant. Ms Deepali Pandey, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri Vishnu Kostha, Advocate for fhe respoadent No.4. ORDER(o»all ( Passed on this 30th day ofMarch, 2010) Heard leamed counsel appearing for the wnt appellant as well as leamed counsel appearfug for the respondents. This wiit appeal has been ffled against the judgment aad order dated 27.7.2009, passed by the leamed Siagle Judge in W.P. (S) No. 5693/2006 ( Dr. S. Jahimddiu Vs. State of Chhatdsgarh & ofhiers), disiuissiag fhe writ petition. The trausfer order was passed on 24.7.2006. Transfer is one of the exigencies of service. Now we are iu the year 2010. There is no scope of uiterference iu the impugned order of traasfer, in as inuch as, we do not find aay illegaUly or iinpropriely in fhe impugned order passed by ttie leamed siagle Judge. In view of the above, the writ appeal is disicdssed. No order as to costs. ~ Sdl- l.M.Quddusi judge Sd//- PrashantKumarMishra Judge FSThafalT