Applicant Non-apDlicant H1GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No.908of2010 Mohammad Junaid Gani, Aged 32 years S/o Abdut Nayeem R/o Ahmed J'! Colony, Behind Netaji Subhash Stadium Raipur (C.G.) Vsrsus SmtShabana Parvsen W/o Mohammad Junaid Gani D/o Shri Abdui Shakur R/o Sharda Chowk Raipur (C.G.) (Petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Mr.Rishi Sahu, counse! for the appiicant. ORDER(ORAL( (Passed on 28'" January, 201 1) 1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, the applicant has challenged tegality and propriety ofthe order dated 23.8.2010 passed by the 4tt Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Raipur in Criminal Revision No.07/2010, affinning ihe order dated 22.10.2009 passed by the Judiciat Magistrate First Ciass, Raipur in Criminat MJC No.34/2(X)8 whereby ieamed Judiciat Magistrate Firs* Class has directed fhe appiicant for payment of amount of ffieftrand payment of?1SOO.OO per month during the period of iddat i.e. for three months and aiso directed to return the property. 2. As per claim of the parties, applicant and non-applicant were hAustim and after divorce the appiicant has not paid the amount of mehr. he has also not patei the maintenancs for icsdat period to the non-appficant and also not retumed her stridhan. At the instance of ihs non-appticant, the trial Court has passed ths aforesaid order aftsr providing an opportunity of hearing to the parties. Ssme was chaiienged before the revisionai Court and the rev'isionsi Court has affiHned the aforesaid order. 3. i hav®heard learned counssi for fts appiicant, pems^j the order impugned, order of the triai Courtand records of the Courts beiow. 4. This is a petitson under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The appiicant is required to show extraordinary ground for invoking extraordinary inherentjurisdiction. 5. I do not find any itiegaiity or ground for invoking extraordinary inherent jurisdiction. Consequentty, ths petition is iiabte to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. T.P. Sharma Judge