A;r V s 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: C.G. WRITPETITIONNO. OF 2005 3 J S.9 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner: Non applicant No. 1 Sarhuram Bhagat S/o Kilaram Bhagat, (owner ofTanker, bearing registration No.C.G. - 14/0701) R/o Deepatoli^ Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.). Versus Respondents: / 1) Smt.Rajni Thawait, Wd/o Shri Ramkumar Thawait^ ^ ^":: ..-••' ^^ ,-y><^ ..'*• •^-^ ^ R/o Tilak Nagar, Bilaspur. Ku.Riti Thawait, D/o Shri Ramkumar Thawait, aged 14 years, Ku.Chanchal Thawait, D/o Shri Ramkumar Thawait, aged 8 years, Both nos. 2 &3 minors, Through Wali mother Smt.Rajni Thawait. R/o Tilak Nagar, Near Durga Temple (Chauntpara), Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur ^ -Claimants ^4) 1) The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd, Through Divisional Manager, Bilaspur. ^- d ^ ^<4^ft;^l—tAY^rJ'^.'lny"c.4^ y'9^9 ^ "/ ^ ^. feyA^ »Ai«t-< «^V^(S;*>^.T.J.-ft'^t ^ Particulars of the petitioner:- ^'^^- <^*^ — ^^^.^- !..-.„_„__ "^' Ll—._—__ XI-HC-22 W^TW (^TTOW^T 9»3TOF<rf^T ^H^ -r Barve,. / c° ^ K ^'OGj *11*1^1 »W€|) -!<i<<ici<i, ^TH^'i^, Ridiyi< 3TT^9TT^T te-^h3Q-^ ,oof~ Ri^ 29 SRprf?Nt^wRff^'fe^ ^nzp[ ^^ri^T3T^5T Shri V. S. Agrawal, counsel The instant writ petition ha^ for the petitioner. been filed by the petitioner questioning the legality, propriety and corr^ctness of the order dated 17-3-2005 passed by the Commissioner for|Workmen Compensation, Labour Court Bilaspur in case No.734AA/CA/04| whereby the petitioner*s applicatjon for arraying respondent No.5 herein jBajranglal Agrawal as respondent in the said claim case filec! by resporjdents No.1 to 3 against the petitioner herein under Order 1 Rule 10 oft}ie C.P.C. has been rejected. 1 have heard learned coijnsel for the petitioner and perused the order passed by the Commissio Court, Bilaspur. It has been me prima facie material on record ter forWorkmen Compensation, Labour itioned in the said order that there is no which shows connection of Bajranglal Agrawai with the truck in questi^n, therefore, the appiication is rejected. Even during the course of arg^ment, learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that husband of respor^dent No.1 and the father of respondents No.2 and 3 was working as dr No.C.G.-14/0701 ofwhichthe p^ In view of the above fact Iver and he died white driving the truck titioner herein is the registered owner. do not find any illegality or infirmify in the impugned order. The writ (^etition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, M.(W.)P. ^0.2981/2005 and I.A. No.6687/2005also stand disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (^^f^)