1 s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7590/2010 Kamal Veer Singh Petitioner versus Union of India and Ors. Respondents Mr.S.B.Desai for petitioner Mr.R.A.Rodriques i/b Pankaj Kapoor for Res. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR& MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE: 29th NOVEMBER,2010. P.C. . By way of this petition the petitioner has challenged his transfer order. By the impugned order the petitioner is transfered to Manipur and Nagaland from Talegaon Dabhade . It is an admitted fact that the petitioner’s service is all India service. The affidavit in reply dated 22nd October,2010 is filed by the Deputy Inspector General of police wherein it is stated that the petitioner has made representation in September,2010 requesting the authority to give him two weeks’ time to join as his wife is having 13 weeks pregnancy and she was not keeping 2 good health. This letter has not been annexed with the petition and and he has suppressed the same. 2 In our view the appropriate course available for the petitioner is to make representation by pointing out his difficulties as this Court cannot interfere in the matter of transfer unless it is pointed out that it is malafide . The petitioner is transferred on promotion to the SI/Steno post .Powers of this Court in such matters are very limited. If the representation is made by the petitioner the concerned authority if deems fit and comes to the conclusion that the petitioner can be transferred nearby Pune it is for the authorities to consider the same in appropriate manner. If the representation is made the same be decided expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the receipt of the representation . Interim relief stands vacated. The petition is disposed of. P.B.MAJMUDAR,J MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. 3