IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5451 of 2010 DHARMDEO SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 02.04.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 9.3.2010 upholding his order of transfer dated 30.6.2008. Earlier in CWJC No. 2590 of 2010 this Court had directed the respondents to pass a reasoned and speaking order in light of the challenge made to the transfer in context of a government circular dated 30.6.2009. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the administrative grounds urged that the petitioner had not shown interest in disbursement of the land acquisition compensation in the financial year 2009-2010 is non est. He submits from the specific pleadings in Paragraph 14 of the application that no fund had been allotted for disbursement and therefore any dereliction on his part does not arise. Learned Counsel for the State pointed out that there are two administrative grounds. The first ground pertains to dereliction of duty in not cleaning the main and subsidiary drains. If an order is passed on more than one ground and one of the grounds is alleged or found to be bad, that shall not impinge upon the other good ground. If an order is severable to segregate the good part of the order from bad part of the order, the Court shall do so. There is no averment in the petition with regard to the first administrative ground. The submission of the petitioner that the first administrative ground is vague and generalized does not appeal to this Court. Transfer and posting are prerogative of the employer. The Court interferes only in the event of the order being palpably malafides or in violation of statutory rules. In what manner the service of a government employee has to be properly utilized are matters for the Government to decide and not for the Court. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)