FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11209 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.S. Kazi, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 13th December, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petition is wholly premature in nature, inasmuch as, the reliefs sought in the petition is that in the departmental proceeding, contemplated against the petitioner, the reply of the petitioner to the show cause notice issued to the petitioner would not be considered and punishment would be imposed upon the petitioner. 2] In the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution, we cannot entertain the petitions on the so called apprehension of the petitioner unless there is some cause of action to file the petition. The writ petition is therefore, summarily rejected. [R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11209 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2