IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1230 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 13.7.2009 Raj Kumar Bhagat ......Petitioner Versus D.S. Bains .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Sharwan Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.15806-CII of 2009 CM is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1230 of 2009 The grouse of the petitioner in this contempt petition is that vide judgment dated 28.5.2008 passed in CWP No.9553 of 2008, the respondent was directed to decide his legal notice ( attached as Annexure P-7 with the writ petition) in accordance with law expeditiously and the petitioners vide Annexures P-2, P-3 and P-4, requested the respondents to comply with the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court, however, no action has been taken so far. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the contention made by him, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to decide the legal notice (attached as Annexure P-7 with the writ petition) in accordance with law, if not decided, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is needless to say that if any order has already been passed on the said notice, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. Disposed of. July 13, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE