IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6848 of 2010 RUPAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR -- -----a---- 2 26.2.2010 Heard Mr. Anil Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ansarul Haque, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under sections 25 (1 – B)A and 26 of the Arms Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery of any incriminating article from his conscious possession. Recovery of country made rifle and four live cartridges is from a joint house consisting off five brothers and family members. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.,Nalanda at Biharsharif, in Noorsarai P.S. Case No.231/09 ,G.R. No.2928/09 subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be either a government servant or close relation/family member. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is made an accused in similar type of case in future, then it will be open for 2 the prosecution to file a petition for cancellation of bail of the petitioner and if such petition is filed then the court below shall be obliged to consider the same and pass necessary order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity to all concerns. AnilKr.Sinha (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)