1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 128 OF 2010 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 129 OF 2010 1. Shri Wilson Augustinho Evaristo Gomes & anr. …... Petitioners V e r s u s 1. Shri Raimund Antonio Evaristo Gomes and anr. …... Respondents Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM: N. A. BRITTO, J. DATE: 21 st April, 2010. P.C. These Writ Petitions were heard for sometime. After hearing the said Writ Petitions, Shri Diniz, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of original plaintiffs, upon instructions from his clients, makes a statement that the plaintiffs will begin their evidence on issue no. 1 first by reserving their right to rebut the evidence on issues nos. 2 and 3, onus of which is upon the defendants. It is made clear that issue no. 3 is as regards the pro-note not being properly stamped and issue no.2 is as regards want of consideration. Shri Usgaonkar, appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, has no objection to this proposal. 2 2. As a result of the above, the impugned Orders are hereby set aside and the applications filed by the respective parties are dismissed namely applications dated 16.09.2009 and 07.04.2009. 3. Writ Petitions are disposed of on the above terms. N.A. BRITTO, J. arp/*