IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 57953-M of 2004 DATE OF DECISION : 27.05.2008 M/s Rama Foundary, Ludhiana .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. G.B.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5. * * * KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that the Certificate (Annexure P-9) has not been given due consideration by the learned trial court and the learned revisional court, while passing orders Annexures P-11 and P-13. Furthermore, the petitioner's factory was sought to be removed by initiating proceedings under Section 133 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that the area where factory is situate has now been declared an Industrial Area. In view of the changed circumstances, the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana (West) is directed to re-examine the entire issue, as by efflux of time, the ground realities may have changed. Crl. Misc. No. 57953-M of 2004 -2- Since I have issued a direction to the Court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ludhiana (West) to re-examine the entire matter, therefore, order Annexure P-11 be not acted upon, till fresh opinion is formulated. With these observations, present petition is disposed of. May 27, 2008 (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) ndj JUDGE