1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.185 of 2009 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited VERSUS Ramdhan Sharma son of Shri Suraj Mal and Another Date of Order :::: 03/02/2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Pratap Singh Arya Counsel for the appellant-company. *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the appellant-company and perused the impugned award. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant-company that in the facts and circumstances of the present case the claimants have failed to prove the factum of the accident. I have perused the impugned award passed by the learned Commissioner. The learned Commissioner after taking into account the reply filed by the employer as well as documentary evidence, which has been produced on record in the form of discharge ticket issued by the doctor, Exhibit-4 and the Disability Certificate, Exhibit-3 has held that the fact of the 2 injuries having been received by the claimants in an accident by a fall from a height during the course of his employment as a Khalasi on the truck are also corroborated by the statement of the employer and stand proved. This is essentially a question of fact and in the facts and circumstances, I find no reason to interfere with the same. Moreover, an appeal under Section 30 of the Workman Compensation Act is only maintainable, if a substantial questions of law arises in the appeal. No substantial question of law arises in this miscellaneous appeal under Section 30 of the Workman Compensation Act, 1923. The miscellaneous appeal and the stay application are accordingly dismissed summarily. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/