(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 9926 OF 2010 1. Gulabchand Khajanram Punjabi, Age : 64 years, Occupation : Business. 2. Premchand Khajanram Punjabi, Age : 74 years, Occupation : Advocate, Both R/o. Bhagatpur, Taluka : Rahata, District : Ahmednagar. .. Petitioners. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. The Collector, Ahmednagar, Taluka & District : Ahmednagar. 3. The Tahsildar, Rahata, Taluka : Rahata, District : Ahmednagar. .. Respondents. ....................... (2) Mr. Tukaram G. Gaikwad, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3. ........................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 19TH OCTOBER 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. The limited grievance in the petition is that though the Sub-Divisional Officer, Shrirampur, vide order dated 5th March 2009, has directed the respondent no.3 to hear all the concerned parties, regarding the amount of compensation to be paid to the tenants and the land owners, the same is not yet decided by the respondent no.3. 2. The respondent no.3 is directed to decide the matter in accordance with the directions of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Shrirampur, dated 5th March 2009, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. The same shall be done within a period of three months from today. (3) 3. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. ( A.A. SAYED ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp9926