IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30882 of 2009 BIGU SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.32069 of 2009 MOHAN SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.32899 of 2009 1. RAM KALI DEVI 2, RANJEET KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 05.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Damage to Public Property Act. . The allegations are of taking the law in their own hand as a mob blocking the highway in protest. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners without admitting the allegation unconditionally undertake and assure this court that they shall not be taking part in any unlawful activities of blocking the highway causing inconvenience to others. It appears that certain co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail and, therefore, consistency requires to follow the same. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be 2 enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur in Maniyari P.S. case No. 107 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Should the petitioners be found loitering on the highway as a part of mob, that will amount to breach of their undertaking to this Court In the event that the petitioners violate their undertaking, apart from taking action against them afresh in accordance with law, the prosecution shall also be at liberty to move for cancellation of their present bail as the case of misuse of the privilege of bail. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)