C.R. No. 3216 of 2008 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3216 of 2008 Date of Decision: July 24, 2009 Didar Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr.R.S. Madan, Advocate for HUDA. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated March 8, 2008 passed by the Additional District Judge, Kaithal, directing that the amount of land acquisition compensation to be released in favour of the petitioner on deposit of adequate security to the satisfaction of the said Court as per the orders of High Court mentioned therein. C.R. No. 3216 of 2008 [2] The State counsel has informed that against the order of Reference Court passed in favour of the petitioner, the State has filed an appeal. It appears that the notice has not been received by the petitioner in the same but at the same time counsel for the State and counsel for respondent No.3- HUDA, on the basis of information supplied to them by the office of HUDA vide letter dated June 23, 2009 stated that the High Court has not passed any interim order directing the release of amount subject to security. Copy of the letter dated June 23, 2009 is taken on record. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that though compensation of Rs.2,82,95,767/- has been deposited by the State but on account of petitioner having no other land left with him, on account of his failure to furnish security, he was compelled to furnish bank guarantee by keeping the entire amount in FDR which has imposed an additional burden of security fee of Rs.70000/- per month on the petitioner. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, it is ordered that the petitioner is entitled to the release of the amount of compensation which stands deposited by the respondents. The order dated March 8, 2008 is hereby set aside to the extent it imposes a condition for furnishing adequate security for the release of the amount of compensation. The petitioner will be entitled to the disbursement of the amount of compensation lying in the bank. However, it will be subject to the final decision of the appeal filed by the State as well as the appeal filed by the C.R. No. 3216 of 2008 [3] petitioner for enhancement of the compensation. Petitioner will be entitled to cancel the bank guarantee by moving an application before the Bank. Disposed of. July 24, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE