r' ^f si BEFORB THB HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IC.GA M.C.C.NO. 7^\ /2004 (WRIT PETITION N0.3922/2003) PAPER UNDER DISPOSAL ^ PETITIONER .0 ,'<? \^.'^ ^ ^ ^ .. ^^ ^y .>' ^' <^/ <^i ^ VERSUS INDRAJEET MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF SHRI KEDARNATH MISHRA, RETIRED REVENUE INSPECTOR, OFFICEOFTHE ABADI SURVEY, COLLECTORATE, SURGUJA, AMBIKAPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA (C.G.) ^ RESPONDENTS •: ^ ^^ ^"^>-.. 1 STATE OF CHHATTISGARH : <^ THROUGH : SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, DAU KALYAN SINGH BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) / ^^^^ THE COLLECTOR, DISTT. SURGUJA (C.G.) 3. THE DISTRICT SETTLEMENT ^ OFFICER, EAST ZONE, SURGUJA (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF PEMOD TO MAKE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE AUTHORITIES 'Petitioner, beg to submits as under:- 1. That, the Petitioner has filed a writ petition under Articles 226 / 227 of the Constitution of India against the Respondent Authorities. XI-HC—78 WR<?IT^HI<^ 'S^ ';^FTRTZT, ^•d1'<-l4l<o, f^<ni<H*j,< . ?r>.C.C.Mo. ^^-/2-<70^- ^"-""••"••••••""•"•"•••T'-V-^-^<200 ® ^w^rf?;yN? ^T 3:i?^l ^^NF •^- ^Tt^?T 1[ra^ ( ^{^<itT) wnw ^if^? ^?? 18.11.2004 ^H(<n<<1i TTR^Tf ^f [k^<\ <H»<^i< ^3ffW37T^T ShriA,N. Bhakta, couB.sel|for fhe applicaiit. . A^ Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. A|lvocate General for the State. AppUcation for urgent hea|±igis allowed. With consent ofbotib: the i^arties the matter is heard fnially. Shri Bhakta, leamed coui^sel for tlie petitioner snbinitted tliat 111 W.P. No. 3822/2003 prefen-e(| 21.4.2004 this Court had dire^ representation raisuig his griev^ No. 2 along wifh a copy 6ftlie^ from today, aad on sucl] accordaace witli law as early] mouths from the date of receipt] by tlie petitioner vide order dated ^ted tlie petitioner to make a detailed Laces before tlie Collector/- respondent )etition aiid this order, withui a month representatioii beio.g filed, the Collector/respondent No, 2 sha41 decide the same on its QWH inerits ni as possible preferably witliin thrc.e of tiie representation. It is m.ade clear tliat if ao.y grievaiice stiU reinaujis, the petitioner niay avail tlie reaiedy avallable under the law. He fii^lher submits tlie petitioner could not inake a representation before t| tlie petitioner is sufferiiig witli b| Coi-insel for tlie State appUcation, HavniR coiisidered the fa<| ^^-.. material on record, the appl| dn'ected to malce a fresh repre^ tlie Collector/respondent No.2| [ie Collector/respondent No, 2 due to roiichitis aiid hyperteasion. has-no objection iri allowiag tliis ts aiid circuBistaaces of fhe case aad catiou is allowed. The petitioner is .entation raisiiig his grievaiices before along with a copy of the petition aiid ^tli^BSB? ^SSSSIBl --<^ XI-HC—78 3???^T^FT R(^i<sh ^7[^?T^FT?N* ^ Vatti ^1 WR'TTWHlch 'T^'-^I^Kn^, ^Tll-^^Ko, f««rlHy. ^: w^'^^^^^^^^ ^^....................^.....^....^.^.^^QQ an^'q^wC^I^ ¥^?Wr^(^a 3?l^?l .-2.1 this order, withia a moirth, anc| Gollector/resppndent No. 2 sh^Il accoidaiice with law as earli m.onths froin tih.e date of reeei^j tliat if any grievaiice stiU reiiia|B.s available under the law. M.C,C, stands disposed <|>f Certified copy as per I'ulejs. QbNi<?1^^ 'W^ff1^ fs<<i <fa^l< ^frstfWCT^T on such representatiGn beiag filed, fhe decide fhe saiiie on its own raerits ia as possible preferabty withia three t of fhe representation, It is made clear ^ the petitiouer raay avail fhe reinedy Sd/- Acting Chief Justice ^ r^'—