l.lFr M ^-;t lil '^ }^" HJGHCOURTOFTWECHMATTISGARHATBII-ASPUR ContemDtCase(CivSiyN6.195i6f2010 Respondents Contemnors Petjtioner S.R. Sinah. l aaed about 61 % yeare,,S/ol.ateShri^ Singh,^^^^^ l^ Naveen Girl^ HigHer Secondary School, Raigarh, District^F^ 'i '. •11: .'. ',•.'-. ;: ^ ,;. .:,••;••''• .'...;. •-Versus,::'..;...;^:l'^LI'|-^ 1. R.S. Chauhah, DistriGt Education Offieer, Raigdrh (C.G.) , ^ s^ Dtstrict E^ucatioTi^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Raigarh.DJstrictRaJgarh^C.G.) GbNTEMPTPE-TITIONUNDERSECTIONl2€!>FTHE^6NTEIVIPTOF COURTSACTRE^VVITWA^I@1-E^2150F^^^I^ •1ND1A. ;" '.'••T.:l:.'::^' 'ApE^arance:'111 :.•'••- :':.. ;-,.:.••.'.'/^ Mr.Harsh Mahant, Adyocate for the petitioner. Mr.DeveshChandraVerma,AdvocateforrespondentNo.1. Mr^VinodDeshmukh;Advocatefc>rrespondejntN6.2 ORAl.QRDER 1 (29.09,2010) j SUNiLKUMARSiNHA.J. 1 -Heard.,.,'1 .!1 .::-..'.:: /'^ ;'::' : .,.".•.::' 1^'' l",.- ,.:.'": ."'.111 ''-1:1.1" 1 ^ Petitione^ S.R. Singh hasfiied this petition for initiation ofproceedin^^^ ofcontemptagainstlherespondentsfQrwillfuldiS(|ibedienceincpmpli^ theQrderdated4.S.2010(Anne)aiFe^1)pass^inWP.(S)N^ iVir. Mahanl, iearned cqunsei for the petitionfer, submits^hat since after passingoftheorderdated 4.8.201 O^^^^^^b^^^^ petitionerdated 13.7.2010^ (^ abeyancQy respondentNo.1 issueda memo^atedj 17.8.2010(Annexure-<^ theref6re,thepetitionerhadt6fiiethisc6nfemptpetition. A repiy to Ihe petition has been filed by respondent N(?.1 , Respond^nt No.1 has contended vide Para^ reiieved in pursuance of the transfer order dated 13J.201 Secretary of the Education Department and the petitioner is still ^rking^^^^^a^^ Principai atGcwernment Naveen Giris HigherSeTOndaiySchc^l^^^^R^ such thereisnoviolationoftheQrderofthisCourt, ^^^^^,,_M^,^MsM CoritemDtCasefCivin N6.195 6f 2010 Mr. Devesh Chanara Vermadra^ my attentioii to^ 25.8.2010 (Annexure-R-1/3)bywhichtheearHermemo^^^^d been withdrawn by respondent No.1. His submission is^^^^ 17.8.2010 wasissuedatUietimewhen^t^ was not in the knowiedge of r 4.8.2010 pas3edinW.P.(S) No. 3888/2010 carneintotheknowledgeof respondent No.1, respondeht No.1 immediately w^ 17.8.2010 and allowed the petitioher to work as Principal in her original place of^posting.' :., .; • ;;:''.\..~-^^ j in the sbove facts and circumstances of the case, 1 do not find any reason to proceedfurtherinthe The Contempt Petition, therefore, is liable tope dismissed and is hereby dismissed. ! ': ,: , • ':•,.'',.'' '— . ^.' :- .. 1 : ; ..11 1;.. ': :.'^ TheRule}s3uedagainstrespondents1&2standdJscharged. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti 'tes^tesi^