[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4502 OF 2008 Ms.Priyadarshini Vijay Kakade and 8 ors. ..Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.M.K.Kocharekar, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi, Adv. for respondent No.2. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants-orig.accused, the learned Advocate for the respondent - orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of C.R. No.I-373 of 2008 of Naupada police station, Thane. The said complaint is mainly under Sections 385, 386 and 387 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned Advocate for the complainant has stated that the dispute has been amicably settled [-2-] between the parties and the complainant does not wish to pursue her complaint any further. It is seen that the matter relates only to the parties involved. There is no issue of public policy involved. Hence, in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of Jagdish Chanana and Jagdish Chanana and Jagdish Chanana and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, others Vs. State of Haryana and another, others Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in AIR 2008 SC 1968 AIR 2008 SC 1968 AIR 2008 SC 1968 and Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab State of Punjab State of Punjab reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582 (2008) 4 SCC 582 (2008) 4 SCC 582, I am of the opinion that no purpose would be achieved by continuing with the prosecution in the said case. Hence, CR No.I-373 of 2008 of Naupada police station, Thane and the proceedings relating thereto, are quashed. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]