THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.5145 of 2010 DATED: 30.08.2010 Between: Mohd. Tajuddin .. Petitioner And Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad, represented by its Commissioner and another. .. Respondents ORDER: Questioning the notice dated 25.02.2010 issued by the respondent Corporation, under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorized constructions as detailed in the said notice, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Petitioner states that the impugned notice, under Section 636 of the Act, was issued, without issuing notice under Section 452 of the Act and calling for his explanation as required under law. This Court, on 05.03.2010, granted interim stay of demolition of the building in question for a period of two weeks and it was, however, made clear that the said order of interim stay will not preclude the respondent-Corporation from issuing a notice under Section 452 of the Act and taking action thereafter in accordance with law. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that, pursuant to the aforesaid interim orders of this Court, the respondent Corporation, on 08.03.2010, issued notice under Section 452 of the Act, requiring the petitioner to submit his explanation. He also placed before this Court a copy of the said notice dated 08.03.2010. In view of the above, since the petitioner was issued notice under Section 452 of the Act, calling for his explanation, no orders need be passed in the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as to costs. ____________________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 30th August, 2010 IBL