WP(C) 5391/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The matter relates to alleged non-payment of Contractor’s bill amounting to Rs. 62,34,545/-, which according to the petitioner corporation, it is entitl ed to for the contract work it has carried out with the respondents. I have heard Mr. J. Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A . Verma, learned Standing Counsel, Health & Finance Department. I have also hear d Mr. C. Baruah, learned CGSC. According to Mr. Chutia, the petitioner has carried out the contract wor k as indicated in the writ petition, Ms. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, on th e other hand submits that the matter needs examination by the respondents. In view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the par ties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ex amine the claim of the petitioner and upon such examination, if it is found that the petitioner is entitled to the aforesaid amount of Rs. 62,34,545/- for the c ontract work which it allegedly carried out under the respondents, the same shal l be disbursed to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be carried out withi n a period of four months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, which the petitioner shall furnish to the respondents along with a copy of the writ petition and its enclosures. The respondents may also verify as to whether the petitioner executed th e works in question at all and if so, whether as per the specification of the wo rk order and to the satisfaction of the respondents and as to whether any deduct ion is required to make. The respondents may also examine as to whether the claim made by the pet itioner is barred by limitation.