^ E .... '^ , IN THE HI<% COURT 0F CEBiATnSGARH JiJDICATORE AT BILASPOR \L) Petitiooeff tacit Petitioa No. ^» ©5 Br« sareadra Chaadrafcar, Soa ©fShri Ram Narayan Chasidralcar^ ^ Assistant Veteriaary Surgeoa / .?'....-'^A^* tacharge Veteriaary Hospital, \^^^"^ •^^"^ Aca@ig» Mstrict Raipu- (C»G«)« »>-^v Respoadeats ^^ ^' ^,^ 'vsrsas « l^State of Chhattisgarfa I'hro^gli Secretory» Bepartreiit of Agricultexre and AiiiEaal Hasbandary aad Veterinary Services^ Na^tralaya^ ®»K»s«Efaawan» Raipir (C»G»)« 2^©irector Vteteriaary aad AQlmal Hasbandaxy^ Beparti»at»Raipir (Chhattisgarii)<» •ss-vsp' WRIT PETITION ?JN0ER AR'CTCI»E 226 OP OONSTiroTION QF INDIA XI-HC-22 3^ •^i*ii<n<i, ^Tft'y^i^, fc)<-iiy^< _..fc0.^ (<+-r^ *IMCTI sn*iith •"••••..•.....'......^ 200^ f^^' •1T- STF^T^iT f^TW3:n^T ^^icb^rf?<r L. y^ ^-^ 3Ti^T5<RTrW:^f?cf i 2-4-2005 *w\v\4\-i Ki^dT^'fe^ ^w{ ^3Tf^T3TT^T Mr. Sachin Singh Rajput, couhsel for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Ranei Lavj^er for tiie State/respondents. Heard both the counsel. j dated 30th March, 2005. whereby the Gariyaband to Dantewada. the petitioner Aggrieved by the transfer or< petitloner has been transferred fron^ has preferred thi^ writ petition qu^stloning his transfer. The petitioner is working as Assistant Surgeon (Vete^inary Science). Learned counsei for the peti|tioner submits that the transfer has been made during the ban period and tii^ chJldren ofthe petitioner are studying at Gariyaband. He further submite titat these diffioulties havo not been taken into consideration while issuing may be aitowed to make a repres< Bhaskar Pyasj, tearned Panei La\ft transfer order, therefore, the petitioner |n1ation to respondent No.1, to which Mr. yer for the Stete of Chhattisgarh has no objection. Havjng heard tearned couns|&i for the parties and having regard to the facte and circumstances of the c^se, the petitioner is allowed to makea representetion to respondent No.1 grievances, in turn, respondent within ten days from today raising al! his >.1 is directed to consider the same and decicie the same within one mohth from the tiate of the receipt of the representation in an objective m^inner considering the grievanees of the petiiioner, jn accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid,|the petjtion stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.Noll 101/2005 and I.A.No.2696/2005 also stend disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifi^d copy ofthis order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge