IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1515 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.3.2010 Gurvinder Singh ....Appellant Versus Gurmeet Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. J.S. Santwal, Advocate for the appellant. RAJESH BINDAL, J **** The challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated January 6, 2010, whereby learned Court below had fixed Rs. 3,000/- and Rs. 2,000/- respectively the amount of maintenance to the wife and minor son. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the income of the petitioner is not that much out of which he could pay substantial amount of Rs. 5,000/- as maintenance to the respondents. Small land which the petitioner owned was sold for the purpose of repaying the loan. In fact, he is neither owning any land nor the money is with him. The assessment has been made by learned Court below on the presumption that the money received by the petitioner after selling of the land has been kept in the bank. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. The fact that the petitioner sold 25 kanals 7 marlas of land on March 24, 2008 and received Rs. 23 lacs in cash is not disputed. No material was produced on record to show that the amount so received on sale of land was paid by the petitioner to any person from whom allegedly some loan was taken and for what purpose the loan was taken. The Court has simply calculated the interest on the amount even if the same was kept in bank which comes to Rs. 2,07,000/- per annum. The maintenance assessed by the Court is merely Rs. 60,000/- per annum. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, no case for interfering with the impugned order is made out. The revision petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 8.3.2010 JUDGE Reema