IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4577 of 2010 MD.ZAFAR ALI S/O MD. HASIB R/O VILL.- BISHAMBHARPUR ALOTH, P.S.- MUSARIGHARARI, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SAMASTIPUR. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 6. MUKHIYA, KEOS NIJAMAT PANCHAYAT, SAMASTIPUR. 7. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KEOS NIJAMAT PANCHAYAT, SAMASTIPUR. ----------- 02. 22.12.2010 Whatever be the legal position by virtue of the decision rendered in the case of State of Bihar vs. Mamta Kumari, 2010 (4) PLJR 318, as held by the Division Bench but the fact stands that any interference in the present writ application lodged by the petitioner would have the effect of overriding or annulling yet another judicial order passed by the learned single Judge which, in the opinion of this Court, is not permissible. Remedy within the confines of law is available to the petitioner. He may move the learned single Judge for review of that order or take up the matter in appeal since he was not a party and the fall out of the said decision is affecting him. Petitioner may pursue the remedy as above. The writ application is disposed of with above observation. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)