1 APPA 89/11 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.452 OF 2007 Gopi Kandaswami Kavandar : Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra . : Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.30 OF 2000 Mary Shetty : Appellant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.92 OF 2000 Baloo Punnaswami Shetty : Appellant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.338 OF 2005 Raju @ Appeal Anthony Shetty : Appellant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. Ms.Rebecca Gonsalvez for the Applicant. Mr.P S Hingorani, APP, for the State/Respondent. CORAM : NARESH H PATIL & MRS.MRIDULA R BHATKAR, JJ DATE : 16th JUNE 2011 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2 APPA 89/11 2 The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the applicant is the original accused No.3 who was granted bail earlier in the year 2007 but he could not furnish sureties therefore he is in jail. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that since the day of arrest of the Applicant, he is in jail and he has completed almost more than 14 years in jail She therefore prays that the Applicant be released on cash bail and personal bond. 3 The learned APP submits, on instructions, that the residential address of the Applicant is not traceable. The connected Appeal Nos.30 of 2000, 92 of 2000 and 338 of 2005 are pending hearing +along with Criminal Appeal No.452 of 2007 filed by the present Applicant Gopi Kandaswami Kavandar. 4 In the light of the instructions received by the learned APP, we are not inclined to release the accused on bail. However, this Criminal Appeal requires to be heard expeditiously. We therefore direct the Registry to list this Appeal No.452 of 2007 for final hearing on 25th July 2011. 5 Criminal Application No.89 of 2011 stands disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA R BHATKAR J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)