ast 1 wp374.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2010 Piraji Namdeo Sarode. ....Petitioner Vs. The Tahasildar & ors. ....Respondents Mr.S.V.Sadavarte for petitioner. Mrs. M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 & 5. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:- APRIL 29, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. This petition is ill-advised inasmuch as the Petitioner has merely challenged the order of attachment, which is a consequential order made on account of noncompliance of the demand in terms of notice dated 4/3/2002. Unless the said demand notice is challenged, the question of Petitioner succeeding in the challenge to the attachment order does not arise. Moreover, the Petitioner has remedy of appeal against the notice of the demand, which will have to be invoked in the first place, if already not resorted to. Hence, this Petition is dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to pursue such other remedy, as may be advised except writ petition against the notice of demand. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)