CRLR No. 90 of 2010 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Shri Parikshit Saini, Advocate, present for the revisionist. Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. This revision is directed against order dated 05.04.2010, passed by the Sessions Judge, Haridwar, in sessions trial no. 139 of 2010, whereby, application for discharge moved by the accused was dismissed and charge were directed to be framed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a bank official. It is further pleaded that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the criminal case in question. Complainant Ajab Singh (respondent no. 2) is brother of the police official. On perusal of the impugned order and other papers on record, this court finds that the crime no. 485 of 2007 was registered at Police Station, Jwalapur, relating to offences punishable under section 147, 307, 323, 504, I.P.C., against the present petitioner Vipin Saini and others. After investigation, it appears that charge sheet was filed. After giving copies to the accused and after hearing the parties, charge was directed to be framed against the accused including the petitioner. The trial court (Sessions Judge, Haridwar) has dismissed the application of the petitioner for discharge, at the stage of charge on the ground that the prosecution story gets corroborated from the medical evidence on record. I have also gone through the copy of the injury reports which indicates head injuries on two persons. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist and after going through the papers on record, in the above circumstances, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order dated 05.04.2010, passed by Sessions Judge, Haridwar, declining to discharge the accused /applicant at the stage of framing the charge. Accordingly, revision is dismissed summarily. (P.C.P.,J) PV 14.06.2010