1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7372 OF 2008 Shetkari Sahakari Sangh Ltd. and another ..Petitioners. Vs. Kolhapur Zilla Sahakari Nokar Union and another ..Respondents. .... Mr. S.S. Patwardhar for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 11th November, 2008. P.C. : 1. The Industrial Court has furnished valid and cogent reasons in its order dated 9th June, 2008 for directing, as and by way of interlocutory relief, a deposit of wages during the pendency of the complaint. Prima facie, the lay off was effected without compliance with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. 2. The only submission which is urged before the Court is that there is no basis to conclude that there is a breach of Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. Prima facie Item 2 9 of Schedule IV relates to a failure to implement an award, settlement or agreement. It is well settled that the provisions of industrial legislation constitute an implied condition of every agreement or contract of service. A breach of a mandatory provision of industrial law will therefore involve a breach of Item 9 of Schedule IV. In these circumstances, no case for interference has been made out under Article 226. The Petition is dismissed. *****