IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8234 Of 2001 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8235 OF 2001 For Approval and Signature: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== ============================================================== PROCESS EQUIPMENTS - Petitioner(s) Versus GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR TS NANAVATIfor Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR GIRISH D BHATT for Respondent No(s).: 1. ============================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 30/06/2005 COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. T.S.Nanavaty, learned advocate of the petitioner states that the petitioner has paid the amount of the installment due and payable to the GIDC, and the GIDC, Ankleshwar has already issued 'No Due Certificate' in favour of the petitioner, he therefore seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving liberty to file a fresh petition in case of difficulty in future. Mr. Girish D Bhatt, learned of the respondent has no objection if leave as prayed for is granted. Hence, leave to withdraw the petitions is granted. Petitions stand disposed of as it is withdrawn, with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. It would be open for the petitioner to move the Court again in case of difficulty in future. 'No Due Certificate' issued by GIDC, Ankleshwar, in favour of the petitioner, shall be ordered to be retained on record of the case. (A.M.Kapadia,J) Jayanti*