SSK/908 1 caw.806.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 806 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1139 OF 2006 Lazaras Karlus Pandit & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Ujwala Shrikant Pandit & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. jyotiram S. Jadhav i/b. Mr. V. B. Tapkir, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2011. P.C.: The application is taken out for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition. The writ petition was dismissed for default by an order dated 29th November, 2010 since nobody appeared for the petitioners when the matter was called out. Since the writ petition was dismissed even prior to issuance of notice to the respondents, their presence may not be necessary for the purpose of disposal of the present civil application. 2. The applicant has given reasons for not remaining present on the day on which the writ petition was called out. I find the explanation to be satisfactory. In my view, sufficient cause is shown. The civil application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The writ petition is restored to file. (RANJIT MORE, J.)