IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1401 of 2011 KAMLESH PRASAD & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 01.04.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 205 of 2009 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307 & 120B/34 of the I.P.C. Initially the F.I.R. was lodged by Niku Kumari, the daughter-in-law of the deceased. She alleged that some unknown persons have killed her mother-in-law. Subsequently, in course of investigation it was found that Niku Kumari was involved in killing of her mother-in-law. Niku Kumari in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. admitted to had physical relationship with one Jay Prakash with whom these petitioners used to visit the informant’s house. It was admitted by the informant that these petitioners also assisted Jay Prakash in killing the mother-in-law. Consequently, the informant was made accused. It appears that the informant in her statement under Section 164 2 Cr.P.C. admits the complicity of the petitioner, though other accused has been granted regular bail. Let the learned court-below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners. With the above observation, this application is disposed off. Mkr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)