1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.313 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 27194 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 312 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 27192 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 27198 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 22.03.2010 Heard Mr. V.V. Ingale, Advocate for the applicants, and Mrs. R.K. Ladda, A.G.P. for the respondents. 2. These applications are filed for condonation of 878 days delay in filing appeal by the original claimants. It is stated that the Reference Court has awarded compensation @ Rs.16,000/- per 2 acre, which was much less than the claimed compensation @ Rs.60,000/- per acre. It is stated that due to financial position, the applicant in all these matters, could not file appeal in time. It is also stated that Advocate had advised the applicants to file Cross Objections in the State appeals but the appeals filed by the State were dismissed by this Court vide order dated 26-06-2009 and as such, the applicants were unable to file Cross Objections. 3. After giving due consideration to the submissions made, delay of 878 days is a abnormal delay of more than two years. Not being satisfied with the reasons given, these applications deserve to be dismissed particularly the very fact that Advocate advised filing of Cross Objections in appeals 3 filed by the State only shows that there was no real intention. Not being satisfied, these applications are dismissed. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] sut/MAR10/ca313.10