IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2454 of 2008 BHAGAWAN RAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 29.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the peremptory order of this Court was due to miscalculation complied one day after lapse of peremptory time. Since the requisites as per the order dated 17.4.2008 have already been filed no further compliance of the same is required and the filing of the requisites is treated to be valid. In the above circumstances, C.W.J.C.No. 2058 of 2005 is directed to be restored to its original file. The application is, accordingly, allowed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/