IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6283 of 2010 (E) ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.416/2003 OF PATHANAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT) -------------------- 1. SAKKEER HUSSAIN , S/O.LATE MUHAMMED HANEEFA, KANIYAM PADIKKAL PUTHAN VEEDU, PUNALOOR, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DIST. 2. SHAJAHAN @ SHAJI, S/O.LATE MUHAMMED HANEEFA, KANIYAM PADIKKAL PUTHAN VEEDU, PUNALOOR, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DIST. 3. AKBER, S/O. LATE MUHAMMED HANEEFA KANIYAM PADIKKAL PUTHAN VEEDU, PUNALOOR, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.JINISH PAUL RESPONDENT: -------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, C.S. HIRTHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VK V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.6283 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 12.10.2010 ORDER Petitioner, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.416/2003 of Pathanapuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 452,423,308,143,147,148 and 149 read with 34 IPC, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioners. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioners should not surrender before the Asst. Sessions Court, Kottarakkara and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioners surrender before the court below and file an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioners. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR,(JUDGE) sj