IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR First Appeal' No. <S^ 1 2007 APPLLANT NON- APPLICANT Siya Bai W/o Laxman @ Luraku Satnami, Aged about 27years, R/o village Sapiya, Tahsil- Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir- Champa. VERSUS <!-..-"•' , RESPONDENT Laxman @ Luraku Satnami,Aged 29 years APPLICANT <> R/oAmbedkarNagar,Raigarh. ^—lab.And Distt.- Raigarh. ^ ^aA O^ MI^'DU_M_/V^-P-TA67£_AGT''''^^3o7_ — 5^ mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (S.B: Hon'bleShriPrashantKumarMishra,J.) First Appeal (M) No. 08/2007 Appellant Respondent SiyaBai Versus Laxman Ca). Luraku Satnami APPEAL U/S 28 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT None for the appellant. Shri Manoj Jaiswal, counsel forthe respondent. Order (oral) (Passed onthis 10U1 day ofSeptember, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appeared, nor any representation is made on behalfofthe appellant. The appellant may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want of proseeution. No order as to cost. __ IhaluH/ Mandan Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge