[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3236 OF 2008 Anita Krishnan Naidu ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Sudhir Halli along with Mr.Rajesh V.Katore Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in CR No.190 of 2008 of Hinjewadi Police Station, Pune. The said case is under Sections 364 and 120-B of IPC. 3. The applicant is resident of Banglore. The prosecution case is that there was dispute in relation to purchase of two flats between one builder Mr.Sharma and the present applicant. It is the prosecution case that on account of the said [-2-] dispute, the applicant hatched conspiracy on 19.8.2008 along with other accused to kidnap the builder in order to extort money. The applicant along with her cousin and one other person were found in a rickshaw with rope and nylon ropes, crepe bandage, wheel chair and chloroform and one black burkha. The applicant no.1 who is a woman and applicant nos.2 and 3 i.e. cousin of appilcant no.1 and one other person who are both male, had also worn black burkhas. Though the applicant is resident of Banglore, she was found along with two other accused persons in a auto-rickshaw at a place in Pune which is not very far away away from the office of the builder. The investigation in the present case is going on. Looking to the facts of this case, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail at this stage, hence, application is rejected. 4. Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court for bail after the charge sheet is filed. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]