IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10577 of 2009 BRAJ NANDAN PANDEY, SON OF LATE GURUDEO PANDEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RUPAULI, P.S. PATORI, DISTRICT – SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE D.M. SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE D.S.E. SAMASTIPUR. 4. THE D.P.F.O., SAMASTIPUR ----------- 02. 24.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievances of the petitioner are with regard to payment of retiral dues and grant of second Time Bound Promotion. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files representation, the same would be considered without delay. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as claim with regard to Second time Bound Promotion is concerned, petitioner shall pursue departmentally. As regards, the claim for the payment of retiral dues, which according to the petitioner has not been fully paid, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 stating details of his claims, enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of his claim along with - 2 - certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioners, as raised in his representation, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the unpaid admissible dues with statutory of the petitioner could be paid without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)