1 3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8608/2009. Miss Lata Kachhawaha Vs. Mohan Lal & Anr. Date of Order :: 16th September 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for the petitioner. ... BY THE COURT: Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material placed on record, this Court is unable to find any reason to entertain this writ petition against the order dated 29.07.2009 (Annex.8) as passed by the Rent Tribunal, Barmer whereby a reply belatedly filed by the non- petitioner-tenant has been ordered to be taken on record while taking the time limit as provided under Section 15(3) of the Rent Control Act as directory and not mandatory. The order impugned only subserves the cause of justice and cannot be said to be suffering from any jurisdictional error leading to failure of justice so as to warrant interference in the writ jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal may be directed to expedite the proceedings. In this regard, no observations are requisite by this Court in this petition because it is always open for the petitioner to make such a prayer before the Tribunal concerned. The writ petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. //Mohan//