CS No. 59 of 2006 5.8. 2010 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, counsel for the plaintiff. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, counsel for defendant No.1. Mr. S.S. Sood, counsel for defendant No.2. The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition. The suit has been compromised and the parties have in fact prepared a compromise deed Ext.PX accompanied with plan Ext.PY. The statements of plaintiff, defendant No.1 and counsel for defendant No.2 are recorded in the Court. The plaintiff in fact is a power of attorney holder of defendant No.2. I have gone through the compromise and the statements of the parties and counsel for defendant No.2. The plaintiff has stated that in fact defendant No.2 has filed written statement in which she has conceded the claim of the plaintiff. I am satisfied that the parties have compromised the dispute. In view of the statements of the plaintiff, defendant No.1 and counsel for defendant No.2, the suit is decreed in terms of compromise Ext.PX and plan Ext.PY. The compromise Ext.PX and plan Ext.PY shall form part of the decree and the parties shall remain bound by the compromise Ext.PX and plan Ext.PY. August 5, 2010. (Kuldip Singh)) (vt) Judge