IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 8322 of 2009 Between: S.V.Ranga Rao, S/o. G.Sethu Madhava Rao, R/o. Plot No.19, R.C.S.Colony, Trimulgharry, Secunderbaad, being rep by father G.S.M.Rao, S/o. Late S.V.Rao, aged about 65 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Plot No.19, R.C.S.Colony, Trimulagharry, Secunderbad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., rep.by Pubilc Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad 2 Swaroopa, W/o. Roshan R/o. 1-11-206/5/51, Ambedkar Nagar, Allauddin Buildings, Begumpet, Secunderbad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash all further proceedings in Crime NO.319/2009 of Begumpet Police Station, Hyderabad The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.RAJU, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY Crl.P.No. 8322 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The allegation in the complaint is that on account of a complaint given by the present petitioner about the encroachment of the road by the present complainant – Swaroopa and her husband, the municipal authorities have initiated action and demolished a portion of their house; and, therefore, the present complaint is filed with false allegations against the present petitioner. Material in support of the complaint given by the petitioner against the complainant etc., is filed. 3. Considering the circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any. However, the investigation into the case and consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. 4. Accordingly, the petition s disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. November 20, 2009. *BVS