IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2004. State of Maharashtra.......... ......Appellant. V/s U.B.Pendurkar & Ors... ... .....Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.B. R. Patil, PP for the appellant. Respondents served. CORAM:V.G. PALSHIKAR AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. 27.10.2004 PC: This appeal is directed against the acquittal of three accused under sections 326, 323, 504 and 506(2) read with section 34 of IPC. All these charges were leveled because there were disputes between the parties. The learned trial Judge on appreciation of evidence found that there have been improvements in testimonies of complainant and other eye witnesses which according to him did not put forth before the Court 1 the true and correct version of incident as it occurred. That being the reason for acquittal of these persons it cannot be said that acquittal is for any reason illegal or perverse. No interference is called for. Appeal dismissed. 27.10.2004 2