Lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLAATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.128 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.591 OF 2009 Smt.Rashmi Ramesh Narayankar & Anr. : Appellants. Versus Purushottam Balkrishna Natu & ors. : Respondents. Mr. G H Keluskar for the Appellant. Mr. Sandesh D Patil for the Respondents. CORAM : C L PANGARKAR, J DATED : 13th JANUARY 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. This Second Appeal has been preferred against the order passed by the Court below whereby final decree was prepared and the report of Commissioner to effect partition was accepted. 3. The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the Appellant has a right to purchase the suit property under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act. The Courts below on the facts have found that the Plaintiff has no right to purchase the suit property under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act particularly because of the fact that Indumati had married under the Special Marriage Act and was not therefore governed by the Hindu Succession Act. It is not shown to me as to how these findings recorded by the Courts below are perverse or against the provisions of law. Therefore there is no substance in this Second Appeal. The same is dismissed in limine. 4. In view of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, the Civil Application No.591 of 2009 does not survive and the same is disposed of as such. [C.L.PANGARKAR,J]