IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.198 of 2002 Ram Pravesh Nonia, son of Late Raghunandan Nonia, resident of Village- Asawn, P.S.- Darauli, District-Siwan. ……Pre-emptor-Respondent-Petitioner. Versus 1. Vishwanath Choudhary. 2. Swaminath Choudhary. 3. Ram Piari Choudhary. 4. Persu Ram Choudhary. All sons of Tribeni Choudhary and resident of Village-Fazilpur, P.S.- Darauli, District-Siwan. ……Vendees-Petitioners-Opposite party 1st set. 5. The State of Bihar. 6. The Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Old Secretariat Building, P.S. Secretariat, District- Patna. 7. The Additional Collector, Siwan, P.S. and District-Siwan. 8. The S.D.O., Siwan, P.S. and District-Siwan. …….Respondents-Opposite party 2nd set. 9. Most. Raburi, wife of Shrinath Nonia(deceased), resident of Village- Asawn, P.S.- Darauli, District-Siwan. 10. Binda Devi, wife of Chhote Chouhan. 11. Indu Devi, wife of Bade Chouhan. Both daughters of Shrinath Nonia and resident of Village-Bhore, P.S. Bhore, District- Gopalganj. ……Respondents-Opposite parties 3rd set. For the petitioners : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the opposite parties : None. ------------ 06/ 20.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was a respondent in C.W.J.C. No.3284 of 1985 which was heard along with C.W.J.C. No.3293 of 1985, for review of order dated 30.10.1996 by which a Bench of this court allowed both the writ petitions which were filed by opposite party 1st set, who were 2 purchasers, whereas the pre-emptor was a respondent in the writ petition and is the petitioner in the instant review case. The said writ petitions were decided in view of well settled principles of law decided by this court in several cases, including in case of Ram Pravesh Singh Vs. The Additional Member, Board of Revenue and others, reported in 1995 (1) P.L.J.R. 764 as well as in case of Punit Rai and another Vs. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar and others, reported in 1985 P.L.J.R. 910. This court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor does it find any fresh material, which was not available earlier, nor even this court see any reason to take a different view. Accordingly, this civil review is dismissed. harish/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )