IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fo 9JT Writ Petition N0. /2006 Service matter PETITIONER c^^> }.<"'.'^"'t ..-••"' ^ Nv^- .-(y' ^-:'A^' RESPONDENTS A -.1 Babulal Nishad Aged about 42 years ^ S/o. Shri Puran Prasad Nishad Working as Waterman Post Matric Balak Chhatrawas Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Distt Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Schedule Tribe, Schedule Caste, OBC & Minority Welfare & Development Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner .. Tribal Welfare & Devetopment Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector <" (Tribal Welfare Development) District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner (Tribal Welfare Development) <• District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF gECSIVED-COPY 'R^^ &ijfdi, C^Eto&.G- ASPUB INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT JN ^THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS ^LRECTLQN OR DIRECTIONS. «w HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNiHOTRi, J ?R WR1T PEimONjyO, 1095 OF 2006 GOWRI Petitioner Respondents Babulal Nishad Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present :- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Generat with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for Ihe State. ORDER (Passed on 24m March, 2006) In this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the responctents to impiement the benefit of the revised 5th pay scale w.e.f. 1-1-1996 with interest. Learned counsel for Uie petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made representation through union to respondent No.2. Learned counsel confines his prayer to consideration of the petitioner's representation already made through union to respondent No.2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/productlon of a copy of this order in accordance witti law. For the reasons stated above, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. SQ/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge