IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16673 of 2001 Between: M. Srinivasulu, S/o.Sri M.Govinda Swamy, Computer Cell (Services), Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ... PETITIONER AND Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing Notification dt: 25.4.2001 calling applications from the candidates for appointment to the post of Electronic Date Processing Manager for a period of 3 years, as illegal, improper, unjust and contrary to law and further declare that the action of the respondent in not allowing the petitioner for interview held on 28.7.2001 even-though a call letter was issued to him to attend the interview, as illegal, improper, unjust, discriminatory and mala fide; and further declare that the petitioner is entitled for appointment to the post of Electronic Data Processing Manager, since he is fully qualified, eligible and experienced and performing the duties of Electronic Data Processing Manager for the lost more than 9 years. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.UMAPATHY Counsel for the Respondent: MR.PALLE NAGESWAR RAO The Court made the following: Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the writ petition. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. __________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY. August 12, 2008 MRR