IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7635 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1073 OF 2005 Shri Panchshil @ Sagar Ramchandra Jain Jangale ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.D.C.Mishra for Applicant. Ms.G.P.Mulekar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 16, 2005. DECEMBER 16, 2005. DECEMBER 16, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Appeal is admitted by a separate order today. Prima facie case is made out by the Applicant and the arguments as are canvassed across the bar, if accepted, the Applicant will succeed in the appeal. : 2 : 2. Be that as it may, it is unlikely that Appeal will be heard in near future, as presently, appeals of prior to 1995 are being heard. 3. The Applicant was on bail during the pendency of the trial. There is nothing on record to suggest that the Applicant has misused the bail so granted. In the interest of justice, I am disposed of to allow the application for bail on the same terms which prevailed during the pendency of the trial, but on executing fresh bond. 4. Application allowed accordingly, A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.