AB 2457/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. K. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, lea rned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam. In view of the submissions made by Mr. K. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petit ioner and the facts appearing in the face of the record, the materials available in the case diary are meticulously perused. No substantial material is appearin g to show the complicity of the petitioner in keeping the medicines in his godow n. It is submitted during the course of argument by Mr. K. Agarwal that though t he petitioner is the owner of the godown, he is not the owner of the medicines s o stored therein. Taking note of the materials available in the case diary, this court considers t hat materials are insufficient to warrant rejection of the application under Sec tion 438 Cr. P.C. Resultantly, the interim provided vide order dated 12th August , 2011 is made absolute. Application stands disposed of.