IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20556 of 2010 RAVINDRA KUMAR, son of late Sri Sitaram, Resident of Village/Mohalla – Gaighat, P S – Alamganj, District – Patna. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna. 5. The District Education Officer, Patna. 6. The Principal, B N Collegiate High School, Patna. 7. The Principal, Nationalized Modern Night High School, Dariyapur, Patna. 8. Shashi Kumar, Clerk, B N Collegiate Higher Secondary School Education, Patna. ----------- 02. 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna has issued Annexure-23 dated 19.10.2010 taking into consideration the observation of the High Court passed in CWJC No. 9128 of 2009 (Annexure-21 to the writ application). The reason for such a arrangement is evident from the reading of the said order. The arrangement is totally temporary in nature subject to future decision which may be taken in the next Establishment Committee meeting. In view of the facts and circumstances I fail to understand as to why petitioner is challenging Annexure-23 because nothing has been done by the respondent which is contrary to the observation of the High Court in the earlier writ application filed by the petitioner. 2 The situation which the petitioner is and the circumstances under which Annexure-23 came to be issued is his own creation as is evident in the narration of the order itself. No interference with the same is required. The writ application is dismissed. However, the matter must gain finality to the arrangement, which should be taken in the next meeting of the Establishment Committee. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)