IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1108 of 2008 RAMA NAND PRASAD son of late Ram Ekbal Prasad(teacher) Resident of village Janki Asthan, Riga Road, Ward No. 2, P.S. Sitamarhi, Dist. Sitamarhi…..Petitioner Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR, through the P.S., Dept. of Home, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 2.TheD.G.P., Bihar, Patna. 3. The D.I.G., Muzaffarpur region Bihar. 4.TheDistrict Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi, 6.The Subdivisional Police Officer, Sitamarhi, 7.Dy. S.P. Sitamarhi. 8. The Station House Officer, Town Thana, Sitamarhi, 9. The Station House Officer, Riga, Dist. Sitamarhi, 10.The Station House Officer,Barganiya, Dist. Sitamarhi, 11. The Station House officer, Dumra, Sitamarhi. …Respondent Ist set. 12. Narendra Kr. Singh, @ Kaliiicharan son of Ramjee Singh, 13.Niishit Kumar Singh @ Nishant Kumar Singh son of Narendra Kumar Singh, 14. Minakshi Devi wife of Narendra Singh @ Kalicharan, 15. Raskshaulwali wife of Nishit Kumar Singh respondents 12 to 15 are resident of Mohalla Janki Asthan, Riga Road, Ward No.1, P.S. Sitamarhi, Dist. Sitamarhi. 16.Shyam Babu Yadav @ Samyya son of Shri Satya Narayan Rai, resident of village Yadav Nagar, Riga Road, Ward No.1, P.S. & Dist. Sitamarhi. ………….Respondents. ----------- 3 19.3.2009 It is case of the petitioner that he filed a complaint case before the C.J.M. Sitmarhi under various sections of the Indian Penal Code against the private respondents. The learned C.J.M, after considering the complaint application sent it to the police under section 156(3) Cr.P.C to lodge first information report against the accused persons which was registered as Sitamarhi P.S. case no. 82 of 2006 but uptill now the police has not taken any action against the private respondents. The petitioner filed two representations before the Respondentno.5 for protection of life and property but no step has been taken so far . - 2 - In a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India disputed question of fact, title and possession etc. cannot be decided. I am not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner sought for in this application, but I direct the respondent no.5 to take appropriate action and if allegations are correct give adequate protection to the life and property of the petitioner. This application is disposed of. Rahman/ (J.B. Koshy, CJ)