1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.46 OF 2004 IN MISC. PETITION NO.33 OF 1999 Asha Sanjay Agarwal and anr. ..Petitioner. Vs. SICOM Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Ms.Shyama Parkar i/by M.P.Reje & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr.Anjal Amin i/by B.Amin & Co. for the Respondents 2&3. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2010 PC : 1 Heard Advocate for the petitioner and the Advocate for the Sicom. According to the Advocate for the review petitioner who are original respondents, decree has been satisfied. Consent Terms tendered which are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The said consent terms dated 14.7.2010 are signed by the parties as well their Advocates. Advocate for the Sicom confirms the fact that the decree has been marked satisfied. In this view of the matter, review petition is disposed off as withdrawn. (R.S. MOHITE,J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 2 REVIEW PETITION NO.48 OF 2004 IN MISC. PETITION NO.33 OF 1999 Sanjay Govind Agarwal and anr. ..Petitioners. Vs. SICOM Ltd. and ors. ..Respondents. Ms.Shyama Parkar i/by M.P.Rege & Co. for the petitioners. Mr. Anjal Amin i/by B.Amin & Co. for the Respondents 2&3. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 14th July, 2010 PC : 1 Heard Advocate for the petitioner and the Advocate for the Sicom. According to the Advocate for the review petitioner who are original respondents, decree has been satisfied. Consent Terms tendered which are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The said consent terms dated 14.7.2010 are signed by the parties as well their Advocates. Advocate for the Sicom confirms the fact that the decree has been marked satisfied. In this view of the matter, review petition is disposed off as withdrawn. (R.S. MOHITE,J.)