IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2009 / 15TH PHALGUNA 1930 RPFC.No. 184 of 2004() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18/10/2004 IN MC.167/02 RENDERED BY COMMON ORDER IN O.P.927/01, M.C.167/02 AND OP.441/03 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR. REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------------- V.SASIKUMAR, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, THANDAVALAYAM, PERINGOTTUKURISSI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.M.GEORGE THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS: --------------------------- 1. DHANALAKSHMY, D/O.CHEMOTHPARUMBIL KRISHNAN, KUMARANELLUR VILLAGE AND DESOM, TALAPPILLY TALUK. 2. DEVIKA, AGED 12 YEARS (MINOR), (MINOR REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN/MOTHER 1ST RESPDT. DHANALAKSHMY). 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R1 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J ----------------------- R.P(F.C)No. 184 OF 2004 --------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of March, 2009 O R D E R It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that on instructions he has come to know that the husband and wife are living together and there is no need to further prosecute this case. In the light of the said submission regarding the factum that they are living together, I close this revision petition. But if there is any incorrectness in the same, I permit the parties to move an application for recalling the order. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE vkm