IN THE HtGH CQ1JRT OF CWHATTISGARH AT ftlLASRUR Wrtt Petltlon NO.'^H? S9 /200* PETITIONER '41 l^/^ -©^-r'%^ ^.$^^ ,^^y^- p>>yy ..••"'-ut\-'" ^.••".~- <»- .^f'- ^y ' '^.--•6^ ^ ~ RESPON&ENTS : ^A. 2. y^. ri>f-l '3r~~> Shffi Kislian Qewangan Aged about 65 years, S/0. A-'l;Ci- -f'r <:lih.<-<<.^ i-A<- Oecupstion- Ex-Account-2455 R/o. Near Sahu Klrana Sh op, Jorapara, SaFkanda, Bllaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS The Union of India Through : the Secretary Oepartment of Industry New Delhi The Ghalrman-Cum-Managing Director, Cement Corporation of India Ltd. New Delhi s:^^.,%^^^ftCT-'l«E^CTtO!N-::tt BI»^Rili^ v- eV> • ^ eONSnfU11@ ORIWBMIt ^? 'd'w|'-<iullirtiq,t»-al<(1<|<», nilwi^TT^ .iis?..P;.il'.o.-..^2,s2, SII^STWRt'il'h: aw3n^?Td>*ficb sii^sT^a^ (1icrf3^) StRITSR^riS?T 3II^?T flh.e 16,11.2005 Shri Ratan Pusty, coiinj None for the responden Sbri P.S. Koshy, counsf Heard. I<eanied couusel for petitioner had been workins CQrporation and he was retu|i petitioner had been paid all reyision ai-rears to the •tuii( further claiuis interest at fhel iu case of termmal dues of date ofpayment. Shri P.S.Koshy, alt fhe dues except payment Leamed coT.m.sel furfhejr Corporation was declared Si4 biadiag up. The Unitofthe fhe petitionerwas workin; inore than niae years and| finaacial crisis. appeapn: wiaffCTdlt iiinl'^'fel^l'lfSl+^l^ ^3lK)*<ail^?T ^el for the petitioner. No. l [IfertherespQiuleittNo. 2. [the -petitioner subinits fhat the ^s AceQuntant with respondent No. 2 ;d fromsewiGe on 30.6.2001. The retrial benefits except C.D.A. pay of Rs. 29,078/-, The petitioner rateof 1»%p.a. w.e.f. 1.7.1998 and ;.D.A. 6-om 1.1.1996 tiU the actual Aig for fhe respoudeiit No. 2 adinits fiaterest. subinits fhat fhe respondent No, 2 ;k Industiy aad is in fhe process of iespoiident No. 2 Corporatioa where tad been out of production for last presently have been faeuig acute SP/FS/2005-20;000 \ Xi-HC-78 *ll*iwi SS'TTq* \dCTi^|K<|riA|, y-altitis, Rrtmy l^-P' (JB- -t-755 ; sn^nwTR'fi'fr traig!i^si*ii* \»l v fb^^ ^T ''? '^ w lsf '"?""}' <- fi 311^91 qgq; (yif^q^g) ^200 + STOT8R^lft^T 3lft?I •3-- <Rl<lfn<Bl *iiiCTl"^t'fc»cl<|uit5;i'( ^aiKlisii^T Leamed counsel for ^tie respondent No. 2 furfher submits that the respondentNo. 2 c|ould not make &e—paymentofG.D.A. arrears to the petitioiieii However, liability ofpayiaei^ In view ofthfirfacts eafly as posslble wifhin aj iiiterest, siace the respoiidf and similarly placed emplQyees. t by tbe corporation is not disp'u.ted. iaad GircumstaElces of the case, fhe respondent Np. 2 is direct^d to inake the payment of C.D.A. as penod of6 niqnfhs. In regard to tt Coinpany where fhe petitiorier was working, had Ueen out of|production for last iriore thaa uiiie years, the respondeiit No. 2) is directed to pay interest at the rate of9%p.a. wifhin a period 0^6 nionths as prayed for. Accorduigly, fh.e Writ petition is allowed to the above exteiLt. No order as to costs. SdA SatishlCAgnihotri Judge