@ M‘zQ/@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 I w.P. (S) No. 0? q q1/2009 ’ K PETITIONER : Balchandra Pandey, S/o. S.D. Pandey, aged about 47 years, working as Training Officer Grade — II, I.T.I Bastar, Distt. Bastar(C.G.) $~3§§2 $am3§a VERSUS if State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretaly, Man Power and Planning Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (1) RESPONDENTS Director, Employment and training, women polytechnic campus, Bairan Bazaar, Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2442 of2009 PETITIONER Balchandra Pandey. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & another‘ WRW PETITION I JNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. LA 7 t: S Vi D. Ad f th etitior Presen hri nod eshmukh vocate or e nne. xi M.P‘S.Btia, Dauy oment te or e State/respondents. 23r N 200 day of ovember, 9) (Passed on ORDER ORAL With the coent ofth parties, the matter is taken u for hearin inall. ns e p g fy 1‘ Learned counsel appearing for the itioner submits that he etitioner was pet t p initially apponte as Drawing Instructor on ad hoe basi by r date 1“ id s oder d 2 9 I. si Diict Dantewada on 4m September, 188 and joined T.I Bhan, str Oober 88. Terafter, the pito conuousl ked ‘5”] ct, 19 he etiner ntiy wor till 2 n 11 e. uaraton on the ame post. 0 25m Jauary, 99 i. the date of his reglisi s n January, 91, the petitioner was appointed on regular ay cal f s. 19 p se o R 6 , Dg A l400-40-1440-50—234/— on the post of Junior Instructor rawin. iter completion of two years of probation, the services f the eitioner was o pt regularied. s 2. The similarly situated emloyees have approached the State Administrative p Tribunal (for short ‘SAT’) in Original Application No. 187.9 of 1991 (Selfish Katmai" Mandloi v. State QfMddhjia Pradesh & another) praying for \ similar relief as sought for in this petition. Learned counsel appearing for ,, Sh ha eit Gvern Advoca f th V \ 2 the petitioner submits that this case may also be disposed of in the same terms and condition. Shri Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the case of the petitioner would be considered in the light of the order ofthe SAT as aforestated, after verifying the facts ofthe case. 4. In View of the foregoing and categorical statement made by the leamed counsel appearing for the ate, this etition is alloed in the same terms St p w r i.e. othe Committee finds him suitale for the post in all respects, he shall f b be regularised on the post hel by him and shall lso pay him saiary on d a reguar scale. He shall be entitled tosaly fo he ates on break in service. ‘ l ar r t d His senority shall be cound fro the date his nitial appointment. i te m of i , 5d/_ ish K. Agnihotri 3 ‘ Judge ‘ Sat