IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26947 of 2010 AJIT KUMAR @ AJEET KUMAR, Son of Late Siyaram Singh, resident of Village-Senduari, P.S. Hazipur Sadar, District-Vaishali Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 02-12-2010 Heard Sri Ram Sagar Mahto, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 483 of 2009 for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. It was submitted by Sri Mahto, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been made accused in the present case on the basis of confession. Besides this, there is nothing. Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State, while opposing the prayer for bail, has submitted that in this case other witnesses had also seen the petitioner before the occurrence in suspicious condition. Besides the present case, the petitioner is accused in three other cases. In one case, i.e. Lalganj P.S. Case No.255 of 2009, the petitioner has been made accused for offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Keeping in view the antecedent of the petitioner as well as materials on record, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)