KESF’éHDEETS Agrahit Ram, aged about 53 VEaIs, Sio Late Shw' Vazwal Q1'Twh, 112,19 villags Ruda, Tahsii uuncmuem, wsinct Burg (CG) .hu‘ ; , .¢ . .guAau Laimaln ba‘i, Wio Phil‘allta, agefi about 65 ygays, Pin V'inno‘F PHHQ Tallsj‘l Glmdgrdghi, Lns1nct Burg (CG), Note Due to mistake har gang iS net mentiofwr1 in the 1'.m_..mwnPr1 Y“E)"”" Omé’l‘. Sfats of M.P. Now Chhattisgarh, flu‘ough WP Sellcc’wr, District Burg {CG}. dagt snwar, aged about 41 wars, nhanuni uwanka, agsd about 39 y6ars7 S/‘o Shn‘ T311 1 1 1 1 ‘ n 1 Haul Jxuuiai", agéu aOOut 01 y ‘ ‘ l' v v “A“DV a. ‘ “u...5 __. H“ “v”: nr_ 2 , ( 13/0 I 0111i 1-1 Lmansai ‘ Dham$m' Mano] Kumar, agec‘i about 2‘9 ‘y‘ears, Si o $111 Res omient No. 3 to 6 are resident of viiiago Rnd TahmW GLmdgrdglu', District Duw‘ {MP -3 r... NO m bu; W an v‘wnv n WRJT PETITXQN UNDER A _T!CLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIDN Ur lmulii SE: HOW§LE SH§i EH—fw‘ §M KifsHRA, J 1’7 R 9f}f}£ u st Ar‘vnr‘at's for the S’rm‘P. Tug poutionor, by this p6tit1'011, has impugnod Tim ordor datod 22—11—200? passod bv 3rd CLvii Judge Ciass 11, Gunderdehi in Civii [113%éfa'a N) ():1 h. Ul ‘hn FratoeK Shanna, F dvocate for the pe‘Lilioner. 11 c s 1 1 EWWW Wm mm w-PLWmiEiOZ/Og Suit No. 33A/‘2007 whereby learned triai court has rejected the for getting the aoeument oi annexure H1 expert with ail observation mat me document in question does not bear the thumb impression of Funanta. L€anl€d comma 101‘ perusal ol tile photocopy 0 €116 name of Philauia 1s wr rawmm HCKE‘: and obsewa contrary to me aocumant. After carefunv exaJIu name of Huranta has been obeewauon of me Court be. fact. 111 view oi me. above order 1s set asme ana me 111 appropnate order airesn ( accordance wml Jaw. being passed Without notice to the Smce 11115 order 1s respondents, hberty ls leeel applicauou agamst tins 01W 011161‘. applicatmn oi the p€uuon€r €xammeci by imga‘ punt the petitioner Submits that irom bare fAnnexule P-i, it would be ancient mat itten over the thumb impreseion and the Lion of the Court be1ow in this regard is ling the doeumeni, it ie seen that the inscribed over the revenue ticKet and the ow has been macie by ignoring the above the petition is auowed. 'i‘ne impugned atter i8 remitted to the triai Court to pass in the application of the petitioner in V€Cl t0 U1€ 1‘6Si3011d611t3 IO mOVe sultablC jer, 111 case they are aggrieved by tins \ Sd/n g Dhirendra Mishra a Judge [11% three