IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No. 3617 of 2011 Date of decision: May 25, 2011 Rachna Sukla Petitioner Versus Union of India and another Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate . For Respondent No.1: Ms. Anita Dogra, Central Government Counsel For Respondent No. 2: Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(A) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction for quashing of impugned rejection letter vide reference No. SML/AD-271010, dated 30th April, 2011 at Nirmand, H.P. vide Annexure P-3 and all further communications in pursuance to this letter. (B) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondents to accept his new affidavit as per prescribed proforma in the brochure for married women and further kept alive his candidature for the allotment of KSK Retail Outlet dealership against advertisement dated 27.10.2010 as the same will not cause any inconvenience or prejudice to the interest of the respondents.” 2 2. We find that there is a grievance redressal mechanism in the brochure on Selection of Petrol/Diesel Rural Retail Outlet Dealers, issued by the respondents. Under paragraph 18 of the brochure an aggrieved person is entitled to lodge a complaint to the Indian Oil Corporation Limited. In that view of the matter, it is not necessary to this Court at this stage to go into merits of the contentions taken by the petitioner since it is for the second respondent to look into the matter. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as follows: 3. In the event of the petitioner filing a complaint before the competent forum, under the second respondent, as referred to in paragraph 18, within a week from today, the same shall be looked into by the said forum and appropriate orders, on merits thereon, shall be passed within another one week. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition while filing the complaint. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. A copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Master, shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice May 25, 2011 (K) ( Justice V.K. Sharma ), Judge