HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY C.R.P. No.45 of 2010 Dated: 9th February, 2010 Between: Sardar Harjeeth Singh Gil. … Petitioner And M/s.ShriramCity Union Finance Limited, represented by its GPA Holder & Authorisd Signatory in office. … Respondent Order: Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for respondent. This revision petition is filed by the petitioner/defendant in O.S.No.1438 of 2005 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warrangal, aggrieved by the order, dated 24.08.2009, passed in I.A.No.767 of 2009. The respondent herein filed the suit for recovery of money, based on a chit transaction. The suit was posted on 28.04.2009 for cross-examination of P.W.1, but, however, P.W.1 was not cross-examined, as much as neither the petitioner nor his counsel were present on that day i.e., on 24.08.2009. It is stated that only one witness was examined on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff. Thereafter, affidavit was filed in lieu of evidence from the side of the petitioner/defendant. When the petitioner filed application in I.A.No.767 of 2009 to set aside the order dated 24.08.2009, so as to recall P.W.2 for cross-examination, the court below has rejected the same. I have perused a copy of the order passed by the court below and also reasons stated by the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.767 of 2009. Having regard to the nature of the claim by the respondent/plaintiff in the suit, which is being disputed by the petitioner herein, if the petitioner is not allowed for cross-examination, he will be put to irreparable loss. Having regard to the reasons stated, in the affidavit filed in support of the I.A., this Court is of the view that the said reasons are suffice to allow I.A.No.767 of 2009. For the aforesaid reasons, the civil revision petition is allowed and the order dated 24.08.2009 passed in I.A.No.767 of 2009, is hereby set aside. Consequently, the I.A. stands allowed. However, as much as the suit is of the year 2005, the court below i.e., V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warrangal is directed to dispose of the suit, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th February 2010 LMV