IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10385 of 2011-I & connected matters. Decided on: December 7, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10385 of 2011-I. Sushil Kumar, S/O Muni Lal R/O Village and P.O. Bhatoli Phakorian, Tehsil Dehra and Distt. Kangra H.P. Presently working as Lecturer in History, G.S.S.S. Bhandal, Tehsil Salooni, Distt. Chamba, H.P. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. State of H.P. through Secretary (Education), To the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. Director of Higher Education, Govt. of H.P. 3. Director of Elementary Education, Govt. of H.P. …….Respondents. 2. CWP No. 10391 of 2011-J. Murli Dhar, S/O Sh. Hari Singh R/O Village Singh Pura, P.O. Bhaganai, Tehsil Poanta Sahib and Distt. Sirmour H.P. presently working as Headmaster, G.H.S. Misserwala, Distt. Sirmour, H.P. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. State of H.P. through Secretary (Education), To the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Govt. of H.P. 3. Director of Higher Education, Govt. of H.P. …….Respondents. 3. CWP No. 10392 of 2011-J. Rajinder Parshad, S/O Sh. Babu Ram R/O Village Bari, P.O. Bani-Di-Hatti, Tehsil- Baroh and Distt. Kangra, H.P. presently working as T.G.T. Arts, G.M.S. Darkata, U/C G.S.S.S. Kuthar ( Ranital) Distt. Kangra, H.P. …..Petitioner. Versus 1. State of H.P. through Secretary (Education), To the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Govt. of H.P. …….Respondents. 2 _________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar vrs. State of H.P. & another. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 7, 2011, ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (karan/vs) Judge.