drp {1} Cri. Application No.3630/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3630 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2010 Shaikh Sadik Shaikh Hasan APPLICANT VERSUS Shaikh Rafiq Ahmad Qutubuddin & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.M.P.Gude, Advocate for the applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State Ms.Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 18 th April 2011 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents. Ms.Surekha Mahajan, learned counsel, accepts notice for respondent No.1 and learned APP accepts notice for respondent No.2. 2. By this application the applicant-original complainant seeks leave to allow him to assist learned APP in opposing Criminal Writ Petition No.393/2010. drp {2} Cri. Application No.3630/2010 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B” and stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A11/criapln3630-10 drp {3} Cri. Application No.3630/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1600 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2010 Shaikh Asgar Shaikh Sakhawat APPLICANT VERSUS Shaikh Rafiq Ahmad Qutubuddin & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.A.N.Gaddime, Advocate for the applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State Ms.Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.1 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 18 th April 2011 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents. Ms.Surekha Mahajan, learned counsel, accepts notice for respondent No.1 and learned APP accepts notice for respondent No.2. 2. Perused the application. The applicant claims to be the Vice President of the trust. The applicant is neither a complainant nor is he cited as a witness. In this view of the matter, the drp {4} Cri. Application No.3630/2010 applicant has no locus standi for the prayers made in this application. In this light of the matter, the application is dismissed. No costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A11/criapln3630-10 drp {5} Cri. Application No.3630/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.393 OF 2010 Shaikh Rafiq Ahmad Qutubuddin APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Ms.Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State Mr.M.P.Gude, Advocate for the original complainant ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 18 th April 2011 PER COURT: 1. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, S.O. to 02.05.2011. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A11/criapln3630-10