IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2008 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 395 of 2008(F) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7613/2008 Dated 06/03/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SMITHA, AGED 42, W/O.LATE K.R.SHAJAN, KOSSERY GARDEN CITY, KUTTANELLUR P.O., THRISSUR. 2. RAHUL, AGED 15 (MINOR), S/O.LATE K.R.SHAJAN, REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER, GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND SMITHA, KOSSERY GARDEN CITY, KUTTANELLUR P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.P. SARVOTHAMAN RESPONDENT: PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------- K.R.BABU, AGED 47, S/O.KANAKASSERY RAGHAVAN, NOW RESIDING AT "ASWATHI", KANDESWARAM, NEAR K.S.R.T.C. BUS STAND, IRINJALAKUDA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== R.P. No.395 OF 2008 in WP(C) 7613/2008 ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of April 2008 CLARIFICATORY ORDER Respondents in W.P.(C)No.7613 of 2008 has moved an application for review of the judgment on the ground that they have not been heard. This court has disposed of the matter at the admission stage on account of the fact that Ext.P4 document which is relied on has been produced before court said to be issued by the Registrar of Firms. A direction was to consider that document and then proceed with the matter. Now it is submitted by the review petitioners herein that the said document is a fabricated one and therefore they have moved the court for production of the original of the document. It is true that I have fixed a time to consider I.A.No.2613 of 2006 afresh in the light of the documents produced after hearing both sides, if possible, prior to the court closes for summer holidays. In the light of the latest developments by calling for original of the documents, the court may not be able to comply with that order. Therefore, I direct the court below to wait for the original of the documents, hear them and pass orders on or before 15.7.2008. RP No.395 of 2008 -:2:- A copy of this order shall be given to the parties to be produced before the court below. Review petition is disposed of as above. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-