AT BILASPUR .P.No;‘3>(%’ C9 /2005“ //Bhuwanlat Banjare, Aged about R.E.S. Colony, Odgi, District —Surg Versus w Ev Welfare Dep Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Ambikapur, Superintendent of The Zila PanchayatAmbika Sarguja (C.G.) The Ambikapur, Dis (C.G.) The Janpad Pa Tahsii Surajpur, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Sargujaw(C.G.) Raghunathpur, Surajpur, District Banjare, S/o Sadhuram 41 years; R/o Tahsii S‘urajpur, uja (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh: Secretary, Panchayat and Through the Social District Police, trict — Surguja (C.G.) pur, Through its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Aambikapur, Distt. Sarguja nchayat, Odgi, Through District-Sarguja, (C.G.) Village- Sarna Chowk, Tahsll WRIT PETITION UNDERAARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R artment, D.K.S. Bhawan, its President, Janpad Panchayat, Odgl, W aS Chief Executive Oflicer at e' 'time of selection to tha post of said Janpad- Panchayat,‘ the selection committeef After the published and in pursuance oi ‘Kannis, Gracia—III were appoin services. Later on vide order d Executive Officer of Zila‘ Surguja, the selection list of cancelled saying that certain in the process of selection. >T Panchayat was challenged by petition bearing No. WP. 2927 The case of the petitioner is that he is presently working alipad Panchayat, Odgi. At the Shiksha Karmi, Grade—III in the petitioner was a member of selection, the select list was the said list about 7O Shiksha ted and they have joined their d 2.7.2005, passed by the Chief chayat, Amibikapur, District— hik'sha Kamis, Grade—Ill was ulan'ties have been committed e aforesaid action of the Zila selected candidates in the Writ f 2005 and while issuing notices P a ' e g XI—HC-22 a? mm, Wm,W m ‘ NtP. Nu. 3130 mam mm mm . ............. ¢ ..... 'm 200s ................................m ............................. mmw W‘n‘wdhmj ‘ %3t%1t3rl%31 ' 03.08.2005» Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. Advocate with Shii RR. Patankar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Dy Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents No. 1, 2.86 3 on advance copy. LA. No. 6198 of 2005: This is an application for urgent-healing. The matter is taken up or. Board. LA. No. 6198 of 2005 for ' urgent hearing stands disposed of. W.P. No. 3180 of 2005: . Heard on admission. XI-HC—22 Wm .N,?No.3i80 WW a1 2005 m Wwa‘fé‘wm , 2- 7 , aammzr WWW to the respohdents, the'High1 Court passed certain order of status quo. Learned counsel r the petitioner submtts that on account of the petitioner b ing a member in the selection committee, the petitioner is‘ eing harassed by the respondehts including the respondent No. . i.e. Superintendent-of Police and a criminal case is likely to be egistered against the petitioner on the basis of complaint made b respondent No. 6. The reliefs claimed in petition are that the records of selection committee be cahed and respondent No. 3,’ Superintendent of Police be also directed to produce the entiie records of complaint made b respondent No. 6 and he should also be directed to conduc i independent enquiry relating to the charges which have’bee leveled against the petitioner, It has also been prayed that if any criminal case has been registered on the basis of rep rt of respondent No. 6 against the petitioner, the same be set asi e/ quashed. I have heard, the 1e ed counsel for the petitioner at k de any averment in the petition that any criminal case has h en registered against him on the basis of complaint made by pondent No. 6. It appears from the perusal of the writ petitio that till now certain action has been proposed against the pe itioner and in fact, no action has been taken against him or if length andL so perused the r ords of the writ petition. The petitioner has not actionhas been taken against him, the petitioner is not awar of the saine. o e t a s y