IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.31411-M of 2009 Date of Decision:23.3.2011 Sattar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Nishant Raj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been compromised. The said fact is corroborated by the reply of Shrikant Jadav, IPS, Senior Superintendent of Police, Panipat, filed on behalf of respondent No.1-State wherein it is mentioned that after recording the statement of the prosecutrix under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the FIR was cancelled. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 23.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE