BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9791 of 2011 1 RAMUTHAYEE 2 ANGAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 7 & 8 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE T. RAMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.13/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 498(A) and 304(B) I.P.C, the petitioners who are the accused Nos.7 and 8 in Crime No.13 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police has come up with this petition, seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the first petitioner is the mother-in-law of the sister-in-law of the deceased and the second petitioner is the sister of sister-in-law's husband. According to the dying declaration, dowry was demanded from her, which prompted her to commit suicide. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny all the allegations. He would further submit that simply because the petitioners are close relatives, they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Perusal of the records would go to show that the petitioners are the relatives of the deceased, that too distant relatives and there is no specific overt act attributed to them. Therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti, Madurai, on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the All Women Police Station, T.Ramanathapuram every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. Sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE T. RAMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, T.RAMANATHAPURAM +1. CC to M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.35173 ssk/12.10.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9791 of 2011 Date :11/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/