THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD C.M.A. No.4049 OF 2004 & CMAMP No.4852 of 2001 & CMA(SR) No.17226 of 2001 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) C.M.A.No.4049 of 2004 is filed by the Insurance Company against the order dated 8.2.2000 in M.V.O.P.No.242 of 1998 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Cuddapah. As can be seen from the material on record, it is clear that the Insurance Company did not obtain any permission under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act and therefore, the appeal filed by the Insurance Company viz., C.M.A.No.4049 of 2004 is not maintainable. Against the very same order, CMA(SR) No.17226 of 2001 is filed by the claimants along with application viz., CMAMP No.4852 of 2001 to condone the delay of 307 days in filing the appeal. The reasons assigned by the claimants in the affidavit that they became mentally ill and they do not have sufficient funds to engage an advocate and that there was delay in obtaining the order copy, do not appear to be bonafide. The claimants failed to assign sufficient reasons for such inordinate delay. Therefore, we are not inclined to condone the delay and hence, CMAMP No.4852 is dismissed. Consequently, CMA (SR) No.17226 of 2001 stands dismissed. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J ___________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J Dated: 4.8.2011 Nn THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD C.M.A. No.4049 OF 2004 & CMAMP No.4852 of 2001 & CMA(SR) No.17226 of 2001 (Common Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) 4.8.2011 Nn