HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.11002 of 2009 ORDER: This Court ordered notice before admission on 05.06.2009 and further directed both the parties to maintain status quo obtaining as on that day. Subsequent thereto, this Court issued Rule Nisi on 26.06.2009. On the said day, it was represented that the revision petition filed by the petitioner is still pending. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the second respondnet in issuing the Memo No.9383/Procgs.IV/A2/2005-11 dated 26.03.2009 and consequential order by the first respondnet in Rc.No.4099/1998/M1 dated 21.05.2009 directing to dispossess him from an extent of Acs.2.43 cents in R.S.Nos.471/2 and 472/3 situated in Nandigama Village and Mandal, Krishna District, pending the statuory revison filed by him before the second respondnet as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and set aside both the orders and consequently, direct the respondents not to disposses him from the said land, pending disposal of the revision. It is stated that the petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of Ac.2.42 cents of land in Sy.Nos.471/2 and 472/3 since 1960, wherein he has been taking several tribal welfare activities. It is also stated that in W.A.No.1656 of 2008, by an order dated 12.12.2008, this Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a revision before the second respondnet against notice of eviction within one month and directed the Government to dispose of the same within a period of three months thereafter. This Court extended two more weeks for presenting the revision. It is also stated that the petitioner filed the revision before the second respondent on 16.02.2009 and the Government also called for records vide Memo dated 20.02.2009. It is further stated that the Government failed to dispose of the revision petition within the time stipulated and the same is kept pending on the ground of announcement of elections. It is also stated that the second respondent issued the impugend memo dated 26.03.2009 and the first respodnnet issued consequential order directing the petitioner to deliver possession of the land without reference to the revision petition. In such circusmtnaces, the present writ petition had been filed. As already referred supra, initially while ordering notice before admission on 05.06.2009, the parties were directed to maintain status quo. As already aforesaid, subsequent thereto Rule Nisi was issued. It is stated that revision is likely to be disposed of at an early date. In the light of the same, let the status quo granted by this Court on 05.06.2009 be operative till the disposal of the revision. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. P.S.NARAYANA,J Date:03.08.2009 usd