-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 813 OF 2010 Ashok Madan Lal Dewan ... Petitioner versus Municipal Commissioner and others ...Respondents Mr. A.K. Prajapati for the petitioner. Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar for respondent No.1. Mr. M.S. Mhambrey for respondent No.5 Mr. D.A. Barot for respondent No.6. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR , JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 2010. P.C. It is not in dispute that the Corporation has,subsequent to the notice under Section 351 of the B.M.C. Act, regularised the offending structure. Considering the same, prayer clause (a) of the petition, in our view, has become infructuous. It will be open to the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings challenging the said action of regularisation on all available points. If, according to the petitioner, there was a breach of injunction granted by the City Civil Court, it is for the petitioner to take appropriate proceedings even in that behalf before the City Civil Court. Subject to the liberty above, the petition is disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.