C.W.P No.17682 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : April 21, 2009 1. C.W.P No.17682 of 2008 Jasbir Singh and others vs State of Haryana and others. 2. C.W.P No.17906 of 2008 Nirmala Devi and others vs State of Haryana and others. 3. C.W.P No.17950 of 2008 Naresh Kumari and others vs State of Haryana and others. 4. C.W.P No.18486 of 2008 Amit Singh Budhran vs State of Haryana and others. 5. C.W.P No.20166 of 2008 Sumeshta Kumari vs State of Haryana and others. 6. C.W.P No.20551 of 2008 Dharambir vs State of Haryana and others. 7. C.W.P No.270 of 2009 Yogesh Kumar and others vs State of Haryana and others. 8. C.W.P No.1473 of 2009 Nirmal Singh and another vs State of Haryana and others. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Yashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP Nos.17682 and 17906 of 2008. Mr.Rao D.S.Nirban, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.17950 of 2008. Mr.Baldev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP No.18486 of 2008. C.W.P No.17682 of 2008 ::2:: Mr.P.K.Chugh, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.20551 of 2008. Mr.S.K.Redhu, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.270 of 2009. Mr.J.S.Mor, Advocate for the petitioners in CWP No.270 of 2009. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG Haryana for the respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.17682, 17906, 17950, 18486, 20166, 20551 of 2008, 270 and 1473 of 2009. In compliance with the order dated 25.3.2009, the petitioners appeared before the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission on 6.4.2009. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a report dated 9.4.2009 which is taken on record and Mark `A'. Copy of the same has also been supplied to counsel for the petitioners. As per the aforesaid report, the Secretary has stated that the petitioners were not able to prove that they had submitted confidential result before the due date. Counsel for the petitioners dispute this. In my opinion, this is a factual matter which cannot be gone into by this Court in the exercise of extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In the circumstances, these writ petitions are dismissed. The petitioners, if so advised, may agitate their claim(s) by way of approaching Civil Court. C.W.P No.17682 of 2008 ::3:: Respondent No.3-Haryana Staff Selection Commission is, however, directed to declare the result of the petitioners so that those persons who have not even made the cut may not go through the process of filing civil suits. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 21, 2009. JUDGE `kk'