1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 9 OF 1998 Nurulhuda Educiation Society, Maindargi, Tal. Akkalkot ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. ....Respondents. Smt. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for the petitioner - absent. Shri. S.K. Kadam, AGP for the respondent No. 1. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 30th November, 2009 PER COURT : 1. None for the petitioner. This matter seems to have been filed some time in the month of September 1997, complaining that as per the order dated 30th of April 1997, passed in Writ Petition No. 1321/1997, this Court had directed the respondent No. 4 i.e. the Head-Master, Urdu Primary School at Ter, District Osmanabad, not to admit any students in the Vth standard in the ensuing academic year 1997-98 onwards. It was further made clear that the petitioner - society shall take steps to admit the students in Vth standard, who had passed IVth standard examination 2 from the respondent No. 5 school. The complaint in the instant contempt petition is that the petitioner has requested the respondent No. 2 to comply with the order of this Court to close down the classes from Vth to VIIth standard and to transfer the students to New Urdu High School, Ter. However, the respondent No. 2 had not issued school leaving certificates to students and bunch of the same was sent to Azim High School, Ausa, in fact the students are at Ter only and the classes are being conducted at Zilla Parishad High School, Ter. This, according to the petitioner, amounts to contempt of order of this Court. It is further alleged that the petitioner - society had not received a single admission from Vth to VIIth standard, because of tactics of the respondent No. 2, therefore, the petitioner is approaching this Court. 2. From the judgment and order dated 30th of April 1997, it is apparent that respondent No. 4 was directed, not to admit any students in 5th standard in the ensuing academic year 1997-98. However, there is no complaint in the petition that the respondent No. 4 has admitted any students in 5th standard in the ensuing academic year 1997-98 onwards. This Court had further clarified that the petitioner - society shall take further steps to admit the students in 5th standard, who have passed 4th standard examination from the respondent no. 5 school. It is not the contention raised in the petition that the petitioners were prevented from admitting the students to standard 5th, who have passed standard 4th examination from respondent No. 5. The complaint is that the 3 respondent No. 5 is not issuing the school leaving certificates, however, that is not the direction given by this Court. 3. In view of this, there is no substance in the contempt petition and I also do not find any reason to proceed with this petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/cp9.98