IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5117 of 2011 SITA RAM SINGH, SON LATE SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF DUDHAILA GANCHI, POLICE STATION SONEPUR, DISTRICT SARAN. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. 4. THE AUDITOR, TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY,BHAGALPUR. 5. THE AUDITOR, FOR THE STATE OF BIHAR, POSTED AT TILKAMANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 6. THE PRINCIPAL,H.S. COLLEGE, HAWELI KHARAGPUR, P.S. HAWELI KHARAGPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 18.3.2011. Heard Shri Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 6/Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner, who superannuated with effect from 30.6.2009 as Lecturer (Physics), H.S. College, Haweli Kharagpur (Munger) under Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of his retiral dues in view of U.G.C. scale (revised pay scale) and further for directing the 2 respondents to make payment of (a) Arrear of un deposited Provident fund, (b) Arrear of Leave Encashment,(c) Arrear amount of 50% merger of D.A. (d) Arrear of difference amount of salary as per U.G.C. scale (revised pay scale) from July 1982 to December,2005 and (e) Arrear of G.P.F. with statutory interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has also filed representation before the competent authority. However, till date, no decision has been taken. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation before respondent no.2/Vice- Chancellor, Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondent no.2 considers the claim of the 3 petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass appropriate order for clearing the dues within three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, respondent no.2 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. It is made clear that petitioner will also be entitled to get admissible statutory interest. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)