SWGlFBEMCrf IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No, z^^-& /2005 PETITIONER ./^ ./*'<\? A<y.^ o^.^'i.V /~ \'i" ^.-\\>' ^.-i^/ ^"/^^/ .0^ .••'^'''••'l^.-'' »>.'-"1?<^-'-' 'x^?'"" ;.-•'' ?;^\''-- ^^'?3; ^'^ ^ «y ^' y" A!v RESPONDENTS 1. 2. / Chandrahas Dubey S/o. Late Shri Kriparam Dubey aged about 44 years R/o. Fingeshwar Maih Road Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS /^1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Revenue Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) YT.. The Collector, District Raipur, Office of Collector, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Tahsildar, Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONE R As given in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As giveh in the cause title. ISk i * asa 68 XI-HC-78 ^P^T^IT^ vtCTi»<jwiw^u>-ol<H<ig,Rril'My<< .^:.^..^^O.A.. 3IT^$T CRR? (qcli^cl^) sn^awfS'iN, ^Firaii^CTSiiflN ^'i. f'~'\ B^iTWt^to3Ili?t 28-9-2005 countel AAiss Oeepali Pondey, Mr. Yashwant Singh respondents. Heard both the counsel 01 The petitioher has prefer 227 of the Constitution of Indi of theorderdated 28-3-2005 t)epart'ment of Revenue, Secretary fixed the preiriium ; value for the Nazut tand Khasra The main grievance of th dnd annual letting value haye b^ consideration the area of l+ie Book Circular. Even though, t^ which was le9t»lfy teviable, howe|i moide a representation before not being decided which moh Therefore, thelauthority »vas intimate the decision thereon t^ >un^el for the petitioner. Thfrkur, 6ovt. Advocate for the S'tate/ <i)i<i[s'»<Ili*i!*)?)V;^'fe'31'(Rii+^i'< ^ai^Tsn&t admission. •t-ed thtewritpetJtionuhderArticle226/ ija, questioning the le9ality and propriety (Annexure P-1) passed by the Secretary, ©ove^hment of Chhattisgarh, whereby the timount, fine amount and annual lett-ing No.303 rakba 0.129 hectares. petitioner is that the premiuin amount. ^en fixed arbitrarily without taking ifito Ijind ond guidelines fixed by the Revenue petitioner has deposited the amount, /er, for the other amount the petitioner ^he Secretaryand •t+iatrepre.sentation is. lead to cancellation of the lease. r^quired to decide -the representatioh and the petitjoner. XI-HC-78 69 ^lllcwwqi^ ycc|^tl|^tC}<4^t!>-(fl'9'"l<SyRrtl<Hg<i ...A};^'.A., 3D^?T q^(^c|tjc|<(i) j3ii^7^rj^ra! 'WSUT^STtb^i* :./*^ 'f-..J=,.. r 'Cl :t& 1 s'ratw:v^f SII^ST Leoirned counsel for thep in this writ petition is that the be directed to decide the repn Circylar', to vriijch leamed 6oyt. hoobjetifion. ^,1-tdving heard leamed coui the fac'l's ond circumstances o No.l) is directed to; decide tht consiyerin9 the points raised b today in accordance with law. lease of the petitioner, till the and thereafter, one week mo| petitioner to take action in acco| With -t+ie above directioni the admission stage it%lf. Consequently, M.(W.)P.N< stand disposed of. Certified copy todcy. <ni<i[»<I1i•)!*inVtf"feii9'<Rf<-dl'< ^si^isn^OT 4titioner submits thatthelimited prayer jSecretary, Department of Revenue, may 'lsentation considering the Revenue Book ^dvocate for the Stnte/respondents has (sel foi* the (wrl-jes and hdving regard to the case, fhe Secretary (respondent representation of the petitioner after ^ him, within a period of 15 days from The respondents should not cancel the decision is rendered by the Secretary •e time Ife^iffer is allowed to the dance with that decision. the writ petition stondsdisposed of,at .3766/2005 & I.A.No.8355/2005 also Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge l^i-isiiiggig