WP(C) 3275/2010 MCBEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA The claim of the petitioners is for regularisation of their services which they have been rendering from 1995 at lump-sum pay of Rs.700/-. According to the petitioners, they are entitled to get regularisation of their services having regard to their length of service and fact that they are now over aged, the respondents in their counter-affidavit have stated that in te rms of the Government notification dated 30.10.2001, the petitioners have been a llowed to continue in their services. In the said Office memorandum it has been provided that, the Muster Roll Workers/Work Charge employees engaged after 01.04 .1993 will continue in their services. Mr. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in case o f any fresh advertisement, the petitioners are entitled to get weightage of thei r past services and also their age relaxation. On the other hand, Ms. R Chakrabo rty, learned State Counsel submits that, as per the Full Bench decision of this Court in Jitendra Kalita & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. reported in 2006(2) GL T 654(FB) the petitioners are not entitled to get regularisation of their servi ces. Mr. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that having regard to the number of such cases there is proposal on the part of the State Governme nt to regularise the services of the employees as that of the petitioners. Howev er, he fairly submits that such proposal had not yet been finalised. In view of the above, no direction can be issued to regularise the servi ces of the petitioners. However, it is left open to the respondents to deal with the case of the petitioners as per the guidelines and policy decision of the St ate Government. Writ petition is disposed of.