•fe •' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. •5^{0& /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER ^.^; '^^:^ &a A-"" RESPONDENTS Smt. Neelima Dubey, W/o. Shri S.L. Dubey aged about 28 years, R/o. Masanganj Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) S. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. -_D-_*yi^ai^> •i-^t-l^^-l-.:" *-1~" -— °%°?^^^?!";'3;'?ffiS 'w^sss-s'sft s; HIGH C_OURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (C) No. 5499 of20W Smt. Neelima Dubey VERSUS RESPONDENTS Regional Transport Authority & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECQNSTITU'IIQNOFJNDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner Shri M.P. Bhatia,Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 24'11 day of September, 2010) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the Regional Transport Authority to consider his application as early as possible. There is no prescription in any statutory rule to consider the application within a prescribed time. It depends upon the com'ening ofthe meeting and.as such, no direction can be issued by this Court, at this stage. However, it is expected that the respondent authorities may look into the grievance of the petitioner and do the needful, as early as possible. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri