IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.12844 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 22, 2011. Sukhdev Singh and others .....Petitioners versus Additional Commissioner (Appeals) Jalandhar Division and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved by the orders dated 31.12.2008, 28.7.2009 and 18.2.2010 (Annexures P-9, P-10 & P-11) passed by respondent Nos.3, 2 and 1 respectively. whereby the mode of partition has been finalized and the appeal and revision of the petitioners have been dismissed. The joint holding of the parties is located at 3 or 4 different places and in terms of the potentiality and value, the land is comprised of 'good' and 'inferior' both qualities. The mode of partition provides proportionate distribution of the 'good' and 'inferior' lands amongst all the co-sharers. The petitioners, however, want to retain their exclusive CWP No.12844 of 2011 [2] possession over the land which appears to be the best one. It cannot be acceptable either in law or in equity. No interference with the impugned orders is called for by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. July 22, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE