1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1497 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.1497 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.1497 OF 2005 Anand Vasudeo Bhise, .. Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Vs Ramkrishna Mangesh Wagale and ors. .. Respondents. Respondents. Respondents. Mr S.G.Karandikar, for the petitioner. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED : 04th JULY, 2007 DATED : 04th JULY, 2007 DATED : 04th JULY, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This appeal is directed against concurrent findings recorded by the courts below by which a suit filed by the appellant for declaration and possession on the basis of a Will, allegedly executed by Sonubai, has been dismissed. In paragraph 12 of the judgment of the appellate court, the appellate court has recorded the reasons holding that the Will has not been duly proved by the plaintiff. Considering that there are concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courts below and as I find sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering that no substantial question of law is either raised or involved in this second appeal, it is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)