IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY F.C.A.No. 1 6 3 OF 2008. Between : N. Ravi S/o. Sri N.Chandraiah, aged about 25 years, Occupation: unemployee, R/o. H.No. 6-2-246/24, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad. … Appellant Versus Smt. N. Manjula, W/o. N. Ravi, aged about 22 years, Occupation: House wife, R/o. H.No. 1-6-174/22/H/12/1, Bapuji Nagar, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ..... Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Srinivas Mallareddypet (10,483) Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Shankar Miryalkar THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY FCAMP.No. 4 6 4 OF 2009 in F.C.A.No. 1 6 3 OF 2008 AND FCA.No. 1 6 3 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice G.V. Seethapathy) FCAMP.No. 464 of 2008 in FCA.No. 163 of 2008 is filed seeking to grant decree of divorce by mutual consent, dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent, which was performed on 08-12-2004 at Bandhan Funtion Hall, Zamistanpur, Musheerabad and to pass such other suitable orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. 2. When the matter came up today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stated that the petitioner-husband and respondent-wife have resolved their dispute amicably outside the court and filed a joint memo signed by both the parties to the above effect. The learned counsel appearing for both the parties across the bar have identified the petitioner-husband and respondent-wife. 3. The respondent-wife has voluntarily stated that she has received an amount of Rs.1,70,000/- (Rs. One lakh and Seventy Thousand Only) from the petitioner-husband, as per the terms of compromise stipulated in the joint memo. 4. Hence, in the circumstances, having regard to the fact that both the parties have entered in to a compromise and resolved their dispute amicably the appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner-husband and respondent-wife by granting decree of divorce. 5. As a sequel to the disposal of the main appeal, FCAMP.No. 464 of 2009 is allowed. No costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI _____________________________ JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY 27-08-2009. I s L – P N. THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY FCAMP.No. 4 6 4 OF 2009 in F.C.A.No. 1 6 3 OF 2008 AND FCA.No. 1 6 3 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: (Common Order of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice G.V. Seethapathy) COMPUTER No. 4 3 27-08-2009. I s L – PN.