IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25564 of 2009 1. BIRJU YADAV 2. Anup Lal Rai Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 17.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is allegation for demand of ransom followed by snatching of Rs. 500/- but both the parties are known to each other. One Bimla Devi with similar nature of allegation had earlier filed a case against the informant of this case that rangdari was demanded by him in which petitioner was a witness and only to make pressure not to depose against the informant, this case is lodged with super added allegation of theft. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Samastipur Town (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 278 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)