THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.896 of 2001 DATED: 29-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner, who was examined as P.W.1, questioning the judgment, dated 20-04-2001, passed in S.C.No.412 of 2000 by the learned I Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, whereby the respondents 1 to 4 herein- accused were acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 379; 161; 168; 409; 420; 120-B & 411 IPC; Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and under Sections 5 & 6 of the Indian Explosives Act. 2. On the basis of a report given by P.W.1, who is working with the petitioner-Corporation, a case in Cr.No.163 of 1999 was registered against the respondents 1 to 4 herein for the offences punishable under Sections 379; 161; 168; 409; 420; 120-B & 411 IPC; Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and Sections 5 & 6 of the Indian Explosives Act. After completion of investigation, the Inspector of Police, Kushaiguda filed a charge sheet and the same was taken on file by the learned Sessions Judge as S.C.No.412 of 2000. 3. During the course of trial, P.Ws.1 to 8 were examined and Exs.P1 to 12 were marked besides M.Os.1 to 42. No oral or documentary evidence was adduced on behalf of the accused. 4. Having analyzed the entire evidence, the learned Sessions Judge came to the conclusion that the prosecution miserably failed to prove the guilt of the accused and accordingly acquitted them as stated supra. As against the same, the 5th respondent-State filed Crl.A.No.1852 of 2001 and the petitioner herein filed the present revision. 5. When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the said appeal filed by the 5th respondent-State was dismissed by this Court on 13-04-2006. In fact, the said appeal and this revision should have been heard together, but some how this revision was not heard along with the said appeal. In the light of the dismissal of the said appeal, this Court is of the view that no separate order can be passed in this revision. 6. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 29th July, 2010. Tsy