Crl.M.C.No.1815/2008 Page 1 of 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C No.1815/2008 % Date of Decision : 07.07.2008 M. Murlimohan & Others ….… Petitioners Through: Mr.Md.Ehraz Zafar, Advocate. Versus State of NCT of Delhi & Another ......... Respondents Through : Mr.R.N. Vats, APP for the State. Respondent No.2 present in person. SI Shri Umesh, Investigation Officer, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, present in person. CORAM :- * HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. * I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Respondent No.2 is present in the court who has been identified by SI Shri Umesh, Investigation Officer, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that there has been settlement between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2. A decree of divorce by mutual consent has been granted by decree dated 22nd Crl.M.C.No.1815/2008 Page 2 of 3 April, 2008. Regarding the claims of the respondent No.2, it had been settled that the husband, petitioner No.1, shall pay a sum of Rs.10.00 lakhs to respondent No.2 out of which Rs.6.00 lakh was paid earlier and a sum of Rs.4.00 lakh by way of a demand draft No.018274 dated 26.05.2008 for a sum of Rs.3.00 lakh drawn on Corporation Bank in favour of the respondent No.2 and by another demand draft No.042371 dated 26.05.2008 drawn on ICICI Bank Limited for a sum of Rs.1.00 lakh in favour of the respondent No.2, has been paid today in the court. The respondent No.2, who is present in the Court, states that she does not wish to continue proceedings arising out of her complaint pursuant to which FIR No.67/2007 dated 25th January, 2007 was registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, New Delhi against her husband and other petitioners. Let the statement of respondent No.2 be record. Statement of respondent No.2, Ms.Hari Kiran, has been recorded and she states that a settlement has been arrived at with her husband, petitioner No.1, and she does not wish to continue her complaint against any of the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances, it is apparent that no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings arising out of the FIR No.67/2007 dated 25th January, 2007 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, New Delhi as the parties have already settled their disputes with petitioners. Crl.M.C.No.1815/2008 Page 3 of 3 In totality of facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice, the FIR No.67/2007 dated 25th January, 2007 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, New Delhi, is hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Dasti. July 07, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. ‘Dev’