IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 88 of 2009 Ashok Kumar ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State/respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No. 4 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Date of Decision: 06.12.2010 Barin Ghosh, C.J. (Oral) In the writ petition, it has been contended that respondent No. 6 has encroached upon public land. Respondent No. 6 has filed a counter affidavit and therein, has pointed out that apprehending such encroachment, a proceeding was initiated by the State against the respondent no.6 before appropriate forum and the said proceeding has been decided finally in favour of the respondent no.6. In those circumstances, nothing further is to be done in the writ petition. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. It is made clear that we have not gone into the correctness of the order passed by the authority, before whom the claim of the respondent no.6 of encroachment, has been decided. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 06.12.2010 Aswal/Rdang