IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19236 of 2010 RAVI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 02.02.2010 in a case registered under Section 379 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the informant’s laptop, mobile and cash was taken away from the train. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name subsequently sprang up on the confession of other co accused which led to the recovery of the laptop and mobile. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has wrongly been roped in the present case as he has no criminal antecedent and a statement to that effect has been made in paragraph 9 of the petition. Moreover petitioner is a student and his remaining period behind the bar will jeopardize his carrier. Considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is a student, let the petitioner namely Ravi Kumar, be enlarged on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Danapur Rail P.S. Case No. 02 of 2010. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)