IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7429 of 2005 RAMADHAR ROY son of Late Mahavir Roh aged about 61 year, resident of village- Madhopur, Chhata, P.S.- Tariyani, District Sheohar. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.The Chairman Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 3.The Managing Director-cum-the Chief Engineer, Electricity Board, Koshi Area, Saharsa 4.The Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Anchal, Purnea 5.The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Faorbisganj, Araria. ----------- 3 04.05.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the Board, who has filed a counter affidavit stating therein with regard to payments made to the petitioner during the pendency of the writ application. Copy of counter affidavit has been served on the counsel for the petitioner today in Court. After going through the statements made in the counter affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the left out grievances the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.4. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.4 shall consider and dispose of the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of the representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation, could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.) Manish/-