1 Appln 4950-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4950 OF 2010 Amit Dinesh Jha ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Subhash Jha i/b. LAW GLOBAL, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 21ST DECEMBER, 2010 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. On 18 th November, 2010, itself this Court had indicated that the trial should be complete within a week. This Court had also indicated that applicant would be admitted to bail on 6 th December, 2010, if the prosecution fails to produce the witnesses on the dates scheduled and the case has to be adjourned for 2 Appln 4950-10 any lapse on the part of the prosecution. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that on 7 th December, 2010, four witnesses were examined and all of them turned hostile and now, the case is posted for hearing, when five more witnesses are to be examined as per the list of witnesses furnished by the Trial Court. He also states that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has been transferred and the Court is vacant. The applicant was refused bail particularly, because he was last seen together with victim by one Ranbir Prasad. The prosecution should, therefore, have examined the witness by name Ranbir Prasad. If the prosecution fails to examine said Ranbir Prasad by 31 st December, 2010 on the 1 st January, 2011, applicant be released on bail on the condition that he shall attend police station concerned on every Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. till the trial is over and shall not leave the limits of Pune District without prior 3 Appln 4950-10 permission of the Trial Court. If, in the mean time, witnesses are examined and trial is over, then naturally there will be no question of applicant's being bailed out. 3. Criminal Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)