IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.2522 of 2004 Between: Y.Venkatareddy, S/o.Subbarayudu, Aged about 68 years, R/o.Katakinadapalli, Ananthapur Rural Mandal, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Anantapur, Ananthapur District. 2 The District Collector, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing proceedings in Rc.No.1261/2003, dated 23.10.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and also being violative of express provisions enunciated under A.P. Water, Land and Trees Act, 2002 (Act 10/2002) and consequently direct the 1st respondent not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the bore well belonging to the Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.I.NAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: Though the interlocutory application is listed today, Mr.I.Naveen Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. _____________ November 19, 2004. V.V.S. RAO, J YS To 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Anantapur, Ananthapur District. 2 The District Collector, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 3 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T) 4 Two C.D. Copies.