1 Cri.Revn.Appln.No.57/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.57/2011. (Balaji Laxman Chate Vs. Kapileshwar Honrao and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Kailas A Kadam, Adv. for Petitioner/Applicant; Mr. VV Tamke, Adv. For Resp.No.1; Mr.DR Korde, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 1 st JULY, 2011. 1) Heard. The accused/Petitioner was convicted for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, did not file appeal; moved by an application for condonation of delay, in the meantime, has requested to stay the conviction and sentence and even the order passed by the trial Court at least till decision of his application, seeking condonation of delay. 2) The learned Sessions Judge, by order dated 5th February, 2011, has passed the following order, - "The execution of the sentence and order under appeal is hereby suspended and the applicant/appellant be released on bail on his furnishing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- with surety bond of the like amount on condition that the applicant shall deposit in the one forth amount of 2 Cri.Revn.Appln.No.57/2011 compensation awarded by the trial court. In view of submission made by the applicant's advocate time granted till 21/2/2011 for depositing amount. . This order shall remain in force till the decision of the delay condonation application." 3) This order is questioned by the accused/applicant and he has urged for at least to grant one more month. 4) The order itself is of February 2011, not yet adhered to, no reason to extend any concession. Even law inhibits such exercise when there operates conviction in terms of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, mandating schedule of payment of compensation in time frame. 5) Criminal Revision Application lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/