HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.20911 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.01.2011 **** Om Pati . . . . Petitioner VS. Indian Council for Child Welfare & Anr. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. KK Gupta, Advocate for the respondents ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I find that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely answered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.12.2009 passed in CWP No.6301 of 2009 (Mrs. Sheela v. Indian Council for Child Welfare & Ors.). (2). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of Mrs. Sheela’s case (supra). (3). However, as stated in the reply, if the Executive Committee decides to amend the Rules and/or remove the rider, the petitioner shall be at liberty to impugn such amendment(s) in accordance with law, if so advised. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 14.01.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge