THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25799 of 2009 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioners seek a direction to the first respondent to take action against the second respondent as he is abusing and misusing the power vested with him, at the behest of the third respondent. There is a dispute with regard to the land in Survey No.309 situated at Nizampet Village, Ranga Reddy District. The third respondent herein filed O.S.No.782 of 2009 in the Court of VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. He also filed I.A.No.1069 of 2009 in the said suit and obtained injunction order against the petitioners and others. It is the grievance of the petitioners that at the instance of the third respondent, the second respondent, who is working as Inspector of Police at Dundigal Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, is interfering with such civil dispute. On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that the third respondent filed a complaint on 10.11.2009 stating that he is the absolute owner of the land admeasuring 238 sq.yards equivalent to 198.96 sq.meters in Survey No.309 situated at Nizampet Village Gram Panchayat, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as he purchased the same through a registered sale deed, dated 31.07.2006 and on 09.11.2009, while he has taken up construction in the said piece of land, the persons named therein trespassed into the schedule property and stopped the construction activity. It is further submitted that based upon the said complaint, a case in Crime No.356 of 2009 was registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447 and 427 IPC on the file of Dundigal Police Station on 10.11.2009 against the petitioners and others and the police have taken up investigation. It is further submitted that during investigation, the police examined four witnesses, who have corroborated the complaint. In view of the same, the petitioners were arrested on 25.11.2009 and produced before the learned VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Medchal on the same day. It is also submitted that except acting on the complaint filed by the third respondent, the police officials are not interfering with the civil dispute as alleged by the petitioners. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that though there was a complaint filed by the petitioners on 24.05.2009, no action has been taken thereon, but the second respondent acted on the complaint of the third respondent. I have perused a copy of the complaint alleged to have been lodged by the petitioners. It does not indicate commission of any offence and that if the complaint is taken as it is, it is referring to a civil dispute. In that view of the matter, merely because no action was taken on the complaint alleged to have been lodged by the petitioners, and as the investigation corroborated the complaint filed by the third respondent based on which the petitioners were arrested, it cannot be said that there is interference by the official respondents. As it is stated that the petitioners were arrested and produced before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in connection with Crime No.356 of 2009, it cannot be said that there is no case made out for taking action against them. In view of the same, this Court cannot grant relief to the petitioners as sought for by them in the writ petition. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 7th JULY, 2010. kvni