IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 29TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 36301 of 2010(K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SREENIVASAN.K., BRC TRAINER (SSA), BRC CHERUVATHUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENTAL OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.-1 3. JANARDHANAN.T., B.R.C. TRAINER, BRC PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT.PIN-670 307 R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE R3 BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.36301/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P2 COPY OF THE G.O.NO.4888/10/G.EDN DATED 3/11/2010. P3 COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 18/11/2010. P4 COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22/11/2010. P5 COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER FROM MALABAR REHABILITATION CENTRE FOR HANDICAPPED. P6 COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR APPOINTMENT AS DEPUTATION AS BLOCK PROGRAMME OFFICER/BRC. P7 COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR APPOINTMENT ON DEPUTATION AS BLOCK PROGRAMME OFFICER/BRC TRAINER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 36301 of 2010-K - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of September, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order by which he was posted to B.R.C., Pappinissery. 2. The petitioner was working as H.S.A. (Malayalam) in GHSS, Kottodi and pursuant to Ext.P1 application, he was selected as Block Programme Officer and accordingly he was appointed as B.R.C. Trainer, in BRC Cheruvathur, as per Ext.P2 order. Later, he was posted to B.R.C., Payyannur as per Ext.P3 order and when he was about to join there, the said order was modified by issuing Ext.P4 order which is under challenge. 3. The respondents 1 and 3 have filed separate counter affidavits justifying the orders. 4. Evidently, Ext.P4 is an order passed by the State Project Director, SSA, Kerala. Even though learned counsel for the third respondent and learned Govt. Pleader submitted that the order Ext.P4 is not irregular or illegal on any ground, I am not going into the merits of the contentions raised by both parties, since the petitioner has got a remedy to approach the Government, against Ext.P4. Therefore, if a representation is filed by the wpc 36301/2010 2 petitioner before the Government along with a copy of this judgment within a period of two weeks, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be issued after hearing all the parties, within a further period of two months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/