:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.332 OF 2001 M/s. D.J.Damani and sons. ..Petitioner. Vs. Naganath J. Deshmukh and anr. ..Respondents. Mr.S.A.Sawant for the Petitioner. Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED : 09.4.2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocate for the petitioner and the A.P.P. for the State. None present for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 though served. Perused the record. 2. This Writ petition is for quashing complaint No.151 of 1998 filed by the Respondent No.1-Original Complainant against the Respondent No.2-original accused No.1 and the petitioner-original accused No.2. The petition has been filed without annexing the verification statement and the order issuing process. On perusing the complaint, it appears that improper papaya seeds were alleged to have been supplied to the complainant who promised that seeds will be female whereas what was supplied was male seeds. Prima facie case is made. It is not a fit case for exercising writ jurisdiction. Hence, petition is dismissed. It is made :2: clear that the observations made in this order will not be used against the accused in the trial. 3. The Advocate for the petitioner states that he may be granted exemption for appearing at the trial. Such prayer cannot be granted in this proceeding. Such application may be made in the Trial Court which will be decided according to law. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)