IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32375 of 2011(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. ARUN A.S., S/O.A.M.SUGATHAN, AGED 24 YEARS, ATTUVEPPIL HOUSE, KARUVANNUR P.O., PANAKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. ANOOP P.M., S/O.P.R.NALARAJAN, PULICKAL HOUSE, S.N.NAGAR, IRINJALAKUDA NORTH P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE UNVIERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 673635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC FOR CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SD WPC NO. 32375/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 23/11/2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 23/11/2011 RESPECT OF HIS 4TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE SD ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).32375/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.First petitioner applied for revaluation of one paper in the combined 1st and 2nd semester B.Tech supplementary examination and the second petitioner applied for revaluation of one paper in the 4th semester B.Tech supplementary examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs