IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34604 of 2010 SK. SADALAT HUSSAIN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners points out that petitioner no. 5, namely, Sk. Talib has already been arrested. In the aforesaid circumstance, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 5, namely, Sk. Talib stands dismissed being infructuous. So far as rest petitioners are concerned, admittedly, petitioner no. 1 is brother-in-law and petitioner no. 2, 3 and 4 are Bhagina of informant’s husband. Admittedly, the marriage of informant was solemnized in the year 1992 and since long she has been residing at her father’s place. It is alleged that on the alleged date of occurrence petitioners along with some other accused went at the father’s place of the informant and forcibly took away her daughter and also committed theft of her belongings. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as relation of the petitioners with complainant’s husband, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to above stated petitioners. Accordingly, petitioners, namely, Sk.Sadalat Hussain, 2 Sonu, Pravez and Gulab, in the event of their arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court shall be released on bail in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 138 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Bagaha, West Champaran subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)