? Nt ^^^.-.-.-^i-.-—-.- ^i;^-^.^i.^.S«; » 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION.NO. 43\4- OF 2004 BETWEEN Chandrika Prasad Tiwari s/o Late Karan Lal Tiwari, aged about 50 years, presently posted and working as Attendant(Paricharak),Veterinary Dispensary (Pashu Aushdhyalay) Kasari, Tehsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon C.G.) PETITIONER AND 1- 2- The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department ofVeterinary Science and Health Department, Mantralay D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Veterinary Services, Chhattisgarh Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur (CG.) 3- The Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) <(-^ ^^ RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^oM^ |(uiandN( E GRPF "-<. © F.xi ^qm-r^T, ^flTFre, fsf^T^ Ljf ^Z^ -^^ l^iw^^-^ii 8-12-2004 Shri Rakesh Anthony, Shri V.V.S. Murttiy, Aktiil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Application for ui^ent Heard, Learaed counsel for matter relates to traasfer of fhat fhe petitioner has beei^ Dongarh to Chithati Block dated 1-10-2004 (Amiexure- petitioner is a Class-IV em^loy< petitioner has been tranisferr^d fhe basis of false coniplaui^ present fhe petitioner niay bej detailed representation beforje respondents, which shall bej accordaace with law. Having considered aci4 on fhe nierits of the case, in justice will be served if a make a detailed representatton the comipetent aufhority of of fhe petition aad ttite ordi ir^to' pounsel for fhe petitioner. py, Advocate General with Shri for the State. leariag is allowed. jthe petitioner subuiits fhat tiie ^he petitioner, He further siibmite traasferred fromi Kasari, Block jDevelopnxent Chowkl vide order -jP/1), He also submits tfaat fhe ^loyee. He also submits fhat fhe on poUtical motivation and on He also submits fhat for the given aii opportuxiity of filing the fhe competent authority of fhe considered on its own inerits in wifhout exprcssiag any opiaion |lie opinion of fhis Court, ends of is given to fhe petitioner to raismg his gnevances before respondents along wifh a copy ^r, wifhia 15 days, aiid on such dir^ction ffiie 4 w ^Ei'-^rqic^?, ^fr?Firf, t^i^p: ^f ^1\^ .^;^,.^ s' •i^tir-^i^iN Gowri I^TW^T^it^i reprcsentation being filed, t|ie competent authonty of the respondents shaU decide fl|e same on its own merits in accordaiice with law as early ^is possible preferably witiun two monftis fix?m fhe date ofreceii^t offhe representation, Leamed counsel for fjie petitioner subniits fhat the petitioner has not been relie^ed, He prays fhat ffae petitioner inay be allowed to contmue, It is directed fhat if fhej decided. It is made clear that relieved or ofher person hasl petitioner, this order will not Consequenfly, disposed of, M.W.PJ Certified copy as per rul^ ^ .-Sw-s.^.—. petitioner has not been relieved aad other person has not jom|ed iii place of tihie petitioner, fhe petitioner niay be aUowed to ^ocitmue tiU the representation is jiffhe petitioner has already been already joined ia place of the jentitle fhe pettdoner to rejoia at ffae earlier place ofposting, Wifh fhe aforesaid objservation, fhis petitioa stands disposed of. No.4668/2004 also stands rv «. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge GRPRJ--FS/350—12/2000—50,000. }^" ^