IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21365 of 2010 PRABHU PRASAD S/O DINBANDHU PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the informant as also the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the First Information Report itself, it has been submitted that the deceased died due to head injury. Before death, the husband of the deceased and his family members had taken the deceased to the hospital and also given information to the informant about the serious conditions of the deceased. If the intention of the petitioner was to commit the murder of the deceased, he would not taken her to the hospital nor he would have given the information to the informant. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2 S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Motihari in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. case no. 13/10, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)