IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39089 of 2011 Biren Yadav @ Binen Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 23.11.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against Pankaj Yadav to have enticed away the informant’s daughter. It is also alleged against the petitioner to have allowed the victim girl to accompany Pankaj Yadav. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim girl has already married with Pankaj Yadav and subsequently filed an application for maintenance under Section 125 of Cr. P. C. against Pankaj Yadav. It is further submitted that other similarly situated accused persons have been granted anticipatory bai. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below 2 within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 05 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)