CLCON NO. 184 OF 2003 Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri Pankaj Miglani learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Kohali learned counsel for respondent. This is a petition alleging that contempt of order of Court dated 22.4.2003 has been committed. The facts of the case were that departmental proceedings were in progress against the petitioner despite the fact that he was exonerated with the criminal liability. The petitioner moved a petition for dropping of the departmental proceedings. The order was passed against him by the authority. The said order of refusal to drop the proceedings was challenged in the Court by means of writ petition which was decided by the order dated 10-6-2003 and by a writ of certiorari the impugned order was quashed and the departmental proceedings against the petitioner stand dropped. The consequence of the same is not that the petitioner is entitled to seek consequential benefit of pay etc. For this he is not given any benefit. He has to seek relief by another petition. The contempt petition is dismissed in limine. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated: 12-9-2003 ISB