IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6594 of 2011 MD. IQUEBAL . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4. 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional public prosecutor for the State. Although petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but it is stated that some looted ornaments and mobile set were recovered from his possession and when the aforesaid articles were put on Test Identification parade the same were identified. Learned counsel for the petitioner points pout that according to prosecution case itself one mobile set of Lemon, one set of Motorola Mobile were looted in the alleged occurrence but admittedly one set of Nokiya mobile has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner so the aforesaid fact makes the Test Identification Parade doubtful. It is also pointed out by him that some co-accused persons having similar allegation have already been granted privilege of bail by this court. Taking into consideration, the above stated 2 facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Bahadurganaj P.S.Case No. 73/2010. Nitesh ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)