1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders WRIT PETITION NO.3198/2009 Mr. S.N.Bhoiwar adv. h/f M.A. Khandarkar adv. for petitioner CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 14 TH DECEMBER, 2009. Interlocutory order refusing the request made by the petitioner - plaintiff for making appointment of court commissioner for the purpose of local inspection is turned down by the Trial Court. The plaintiff/petitioner presented an application at Exh.78 in a pending suit requesting the Court to appoint Court Commissioner for local inspection. According to the petitioner/plaintiff appointment of Court Commissioner is necessary for ascertaining the boundaries of the suit land as well as for examining the situation of the property. The trial court has recorded reasons for refusal of the request made by the petitioner 2 and it is noted by the trial court that recording of the evidence of the plaintiff is over and the last witness is examined by the defendant on 31.03.2008. Defendant has admitted the boundaries of the suit land and the situation of the stream. The Trial Court, thus, found that the appointment of the commissioner for conducting local inspection is not warranted. The satisfaction arrived at, by the trial court need not be interferred while dealing with the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Considering the interlocutory nature of the impugned order, exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 is not warranted. Petition is devoid of substance. Hence stands rejected [ R. M. BORDE, J. ] ... Dt : 14.12.2009 aaa/3198.09