( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.876 of 2008 (For Anticipatory bail Suresh Himmatlal Shah ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr K. H. Giri, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr S. S. Pednekar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr Shirish Gupte, Sr.Advocate with Mr M.K. Kochrekar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C. DAGA, J. DATED : 28.04.2008. DATED : 28.04.2008. DATED : 28.04.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard both parties including the complainant. Having heard them for sometime all the parties agree that by consent of parties recording of reasons in support of this order may be dispensed with. Accordingly, this order is passed dispensing with the reasons in support thereof. 2. Life of the anticipatory bail granted by the Court below is extended till the stage of filing ( 2 ) of the charge sheet. 3. It is made clear that I am not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. When the bail application would be moved in terms of Section 439 of the Code before the concerned Court the same should be considered in its proper perspective in accordance with law. If an application for bail is moved, the concerned Court would do well to dispose it of preferably on the day it is filed. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State is directed to inform its counter part in the trial Court to be ready with all relevant records with the bail application and no adjournment shall be asked for on the ground of non-availability of records if the accused-applicant intimate the date on which he propose to surrender three days in advance. 4. Application stands disposed of in terms of this order. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)