CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1786 OF 2011 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 14, 2011 Marman .....Petitioner VERSUS Yashbir and others ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Jasmer Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this revision petition to impugn the order of acquittal concurrently passed by the Trial Court as well as Appellate Court. The case was registered on the complaint of the petitioner that respondent-Yashbir had given assurance to get her unmarried son married for consideration of `85,000/-. Thereafter this money was paid and Yashbir had brought one girl to the house of the petitioner, saying that she can be married to her son. On the basis of the complaint, the CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1786 OF 2011 :{ 2 }: present FIR was registered. Some currency notes were also recovered from respondent-Ravi Kumar etc. The prosecution story was disbelieved primarily on the ground that the evidence of the complainant was not believable as the petitioner was in no position to pay this huge amount. The petitioner could not lead sufficient evidence to show that how she came to acquire such a huge amount. Otherwise also, the story was disbelieved on the ground that the girl, which was left was dumb whereas the petitioner had made out that she was speaking some language, which the petitioner could not understand. On the basis of this infirm evidence, the allegation levelled against the respondents that the girl was sold as slave could not be made out as the girl allegedly sold was not able to converse. The Investigating Officer also could not produce any evidence pointing towards the guilt of the respondents. The evidence led by the prosecution was critically analyzed by the Court, leading to order of acquittal. Even if some other view is possible, that would not be a ground to interfere in the order of acquittal as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhim Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2002(10) SCC 461. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. October 14 ,2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE