SSss-.n" :-. vse5Wf S' s C ^- \'ve,^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR W . P. (S) N0. i^_/2007 a's Petitioner Beganlal Sahu, S/o Shri ^niram Sahu, Aged about 43 .o'i'~ ' ^[-...-;^5''1' ; years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. '^*- v.:l'° ^ !..'\^ ;••" ..-•'' _ __ '. ^0,';","^" ...-""" Primaiy School, Kohaka No.l, ..V^SP'"" ^y^y Bhilai, Durg, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) ^o-' ^:-'-' ?<•'"" ^^ •••y Versus •^- Respondents : ^ i) ..<y^v^ ,,^ \^/ ^y^ f^VI/ ^ o-' ii) iu) State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretaiy School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) Directorate of Public Instruction, Raipur-(C.G.) District Education Officer, Durg-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA H!GH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.?S)No.1287 of 2007 Petifoner Begania! Sahu Versus Respondente Stete of Chhattsgarh & oftie" SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justiee Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri S. K. Thomas, Advocae forttie petilioner. Shri Safeh Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate forthe respondente. ORDER Thakur 3. 2GG7) (Passed on ftis 2"11 day of March, 2007) The foitowsng order of fte Court is passed by Satish K. Agniftofri, J. 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petittoner submite that the quesSon of !aw invoived in ttiis peStion Js govemed by the circuiar dated 20.1.1987. Ths High Court of Madhya Pradesh, indore Ber.ch, in the cass of Sndravesr Singh Tomar Vs. StaSe of W.P. and othsrs { 2004 C2) M.P.H.T. 3 ^OC)}, has considered the issue and dssposed of the said mafier in the foito'Aing tsrms:- "2..........1n vie'A' of this submission advanced by Counsel for parties, this petition is dispossd &f by giving foiiowing direcfens. Ths respondant Nc.1 shall considsr peStioner's repressntations referred to above and dispose of the same at an earty date, preferabiy 'within a period of 3 months from the date of co.'nmunication of this oreter in accordance with iaw, keeping in mind the circutare issued by State Govt. as aiso the directtons giv^n by the TribunaS in simsfar mattere." 2. Learned counssl appearing for fhe parties would jointiy submit and admit ttiat this case, bsing simiiar in natyre, is sc^iareiy covered by She decision in the case of indraveer Singh Tomar (supra). !n view of the aforestated reasons, this psSCon is disposed of vflfri iiberty to the peSSioner to make a representation along with a copy of the order passed in e cass of Indraveer Singh Tomar (supra), •A'hich may be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw, wthin a period of six v;eeks from the date of recsipt of the representatton. NG order as to costs. ' Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge