IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2009 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13057 of 2009 ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHEJI.N.M. S/O. MUSTHAFA, NEDUMPALLIL HOUSE, KUTTIAMCHAL, KUTTAMPUZHA, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. MR.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. BEJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No.13057 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 12th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved of the Revenue Recovery proceedings initiated against him pursuant to the award passed by the MACT, Muvattupuzha in OPMV 1252 of 2003, where the petitioner was declared ex parte. The remedy provided to the petitioner, if aggrieved of the award is, by way of appeal as provided under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner conceded that petitioner has already approached this Court by filing appeal as MACA 910 of 2009 and that notice has already been ordered to the respondents in the petition filed for condoning the delay. It is for the petitioner to pursue the matter in appeal. The Writ Petition to intercept the steps for execution of the award is not maintainable. No interference is called for. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd