IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2221 of 2009. Decided on: 28.3.2011. Dev Raj …..Petitioner. versus State of H.P. & ors. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr.Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.J.S. Guleria, Asstt.A.G., for the respondents No.1, 3 and 4. Mr.Naveen K.Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ V.K. Ahuja, J. (Oral) The learned Assistant Advocate General submits that the petitioner has been adjusted in the School as prayed by him and the private respondent has also been adjusted. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition, which stands disposed of accordingly. However, it is made clear that grant-in-aid, as per the Rules, be paid by the State, if not already paid. 2. In view of the final disposal of the main petition, all the pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. March 28, 2010. (V.K. Ahuja), (tilak) Judge.