IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9353 of 2010(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- U.D.SHANI, SHEENA NIVAS, P.O.PATHEYAKUNNU, PANOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI.BALAMOHANA BABU, S/O.BALAN, RATHIN NIVAS, P.O.PALAYAD, THALASSERY. BY ADV. MR.O.D.SIVADAS. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTRORITY, KANNUR. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.9353 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Stage Carriage operator conducting services on the route Vellarikundu-Kozhikode with a Stage Carriage vehicle bearing registration No.KL-58/A 7029. According to the petitioner, the timings of his services were settled long time back. Subsequent to the settlement of his timings, a number of new services have been introduced on the route, thereby reducing the time gap with which he had been conducting his services. Consequently, clashes with the services of other operators occur. The petitioner has therefore submitted a request for the revision of his own timings. He complains that no action has been taken thereon, till date. 2. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the application for revision of his own timings submitted by the petitioner evidenced herein by Ext.P1, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, Wpc 9353/2010 2 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk