Compounding App. 522 / 11 In C-482 No. 983 of 2010 on. Prafulla C. Pant, J. H Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Bohara, Brief Holder, present for the State. Mr. S.K. Shandilya, Advocate, present for respondent No. 2. Sulakshana, daughter of the complainant, identified by counsel, is also present in person. Heard. This is Compounding Application No. 522 of 2011, moved on behalf of the parties, stating that the parties have entered into compromise, and the criminal proceedings may be dropped. The application is supported by affidavit. The complainant (respondent No. 2) and his daughter Sulakshana, affirmed that parties have entered into compromise, and they are not interested to prosecute the petitioners. It is prayed by learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 that the impugned criminal proceedings may be quashed. In the above circumstances, in view of principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana (2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675, this court is of the view that the impugned proceedings challenged before this court are liable to be quashed. Therefore, the Compounding Application No. 522 of 2011 is allowed. Accordingly, the Criminal Misc. Application (C-482) No. 983 of 2010 is also allowed. The proceedings of criminal case No. 3376 of 2010, State Vs. Parmanand and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., police station Kotwali Roorkee, district Haridwar, pending in the court of Judicial e, Roorkee, are hereby quashed. Magistrat (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 23.05.2011 HN