IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7896 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: March 31, 2011 Vandana .. Petitioner Vs. Subash Kumar .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Pardeep Chahar, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This petition assails the order dated 20.10.2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Jhajjar, whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed by order of the court. Having scrutinized the impugned order and gone through the record of the case, it would be expedient in the interest of justice if one opportunity is granted to the petitioner to conclude his entire evidence. The delay, if any caused, could be compensated by way of costs. As such, this petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is granted one opportunity to conclude his entire evidence subject to payment of `3000/- as costs. This petition is allowed without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. March 31, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge