HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.3955 OF 2010 ORDER: Petitioners filed O.S. No.70 of 1999 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Sidhout, Kadapa District, against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The suit is now at the stage of arguments. Petitioners filed I.A. No.191 of 2010 under Order – XVII Rule – 1 CPC with a prayer to adjourn the suit by 15 days. The trial Court dismissed the I.A. through its order dated 27-8-2010. Hence, this revision. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the reason for the petitioners to seek adjournment is that a Writ Appeal was filed by them before a Division Bench of this Court against the orders in Writ Petition No.24553 of 1999 and that it would have a direct bearing on the issue. 3. The writ petition is said to have been filed by the respondents in relation to the validity of the orders of assignment in respect of the same land. That would have a bearing, at the most, upon the title of the respective parties. The suit filed by the petitioners is the one for injunction simplicitor. The only question that needs to be decided is as to whether the petitioners were in possession and enjoyment of the property, as on the date of filing of the suit. More than 11 years have elapsed. The suit happens to be the oldest one pending in the trial Court. In the order under revision an observation was made to the effect that both the parties have dragged the proceedings for the past more than a decade. This Court does not find any basis to interfere with the orders under revision. 4. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J August 31, 2010. KTL