IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-17614 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision:28.07.2011 Rohtas . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.365 dated 28.8.2010 under Sections 302, 449, 120-B & 218 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 25/29B, 30, 54 & 59 of the Arms Act at Police Station City Sampla, District Rohtak. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had provided 10 cartridges of .12 bore gun to one Rajesh, who wanted to use them in a marriage, however, Rajesh had a licensed gun which has been used for the murder of Kalu Ram. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been arrested for the offence under Sections 27 & 30 of the Arms Act and Section 120B of the IPC. He further submits that he is in custody since 2.1.2011 despite the fact that the challan has been presented. Learned counsel for the State/respondent has submitted that the petitioner is a link in the alleged occurrence as he had supplied ammunition to Rajesh. He, however, submits that the petitioner is neither previous convict nor wanted in another case. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case but without making any observation on the merits, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the petition is hereby allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 28, 2011 JUDGE Vivek