IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16650 of 2010 SUJIT TANTI @ SUCHIT TANTI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 20/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Section-364/34 of Indian Penal Code is that the allegations themselves are that the parties were well- known to each other and the alleged victim voluntarily went along with petitioner and others. The court below notices “It is true that from the C.D. it transpires that the victim and all the accused persons were criminals engaged in stealing Iron chips from the railway and making money by selling it”. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC 1st, Munger, District- Munger in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No.96/08, S.Tr. No.151/09. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)