IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12944 of 2009 PAWAN DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 08-10-2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make typographical correction in the name of respondent no.9 in the cause title. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of respondent no.9 as an Anganbari Sevika. In preference to her appointment alleging that the selection is vitiated due to a forged certificate presented by respondent no.9. Counsel for the State raises a preliminary objection to the availability of the remedy before the District Program Officer, and against which appeal lies before the District Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the writ petition to prefer an application before the District Program Officer, questioning the appointment of respondent no.9. If the petitioner prefers any such application before the District Program Officer within a maximum period of one month from today it shall be decided in accordance with law after hearing all concerned, including respondent no.9, within a maximum period of three months from the date of such presentation. BTiwary/ ( Navin Sinha, J )