IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1419 of 2005 Sadhu Sharan Singh, son of Madho Mahto, resident of Village-Pathnaura, Via- Rajgir, P.S.-Silao, District-Nalanda ………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Superintendent Education, Nawada 3. The Treasury Officer, Nalanda 4. The Area Education Officer, Nawada 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna ………Respondents ----------- 08. 30.01.2009 The only reason while the Court is not inclined to adjudicate the issue raised by the petitioner is that way back in the year 1999 the so called promotion granted to the petitioner was cancelled but it did not bother him to challenge the said order. In the year 2005 only when the recovery has already been made in furtherance to the cancellation of promotion vide an order dated 31.08.2004, the petitioner rushed to this Court for challenging various orders. There are obvious latches or delay on his part in the matter. However since the order of recovery has been made after this petitioner had superannuated liberty is granted to him to file a representation before the Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar establishing his bona-fide for such relief which the petitioner may be entitled to. It is made clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the merit of the decisions taken by the - 2 - respondents. The writ application stands disposed of with above liberty. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)