Civil Revision No. 3641 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3641 of 2011 Date of Decision: 31.5.2011 *** Rani Devi .. Petitioner Vs. Hindu United Family & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. By dint of impugned order dated 15.4.2011, the application of the petitioner-plaintiff for leading additional evidence, has been dismissed. Heard. It is evident from the perusal of the impugned order that the evidence of the petitioner was closed by an order of the Court dated 27.7.2009. When the case was at the stage of arguments, she filed the impugned application, obviously, to wriggle out of the aforesaid vide which her evidence was closed by the Court by adopting coercive method. That apart, the petitioner failed to explain that despite exercise of due diligence, she could not produce the aforesaid documents, sought to be produced in additional evidence, when her evidence was going on. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The petition, being without any merit, is dismissed in limine. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 31, 2011 Jiten