IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.232 of 2008 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY, HAJIPUR ……. …….Appellant Versus JITENDRA SAO son of Shri Devendra Sao, Resident of Mohalla-Ghoswari, Thana-Bakhtiyarpur District- Patna ….… …..Respondent ----------- 15. 31.3.2011. Heard Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Anant Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent. The present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 22.2.2008 passed in O.A. No.133 of 2004 by Railway Claims Tribunal, Patna Bench. At the time of argument, learned counsel for the appellant, while assailing the impugned order, has only raised an issue that in the first information report the claimant stated that after the accident, from the railway station he was carried to P.M.C.H. whereas in the affidavit filed it was stated that firstly from the platform he was carried to N.M.C.H. where he was treated. It was further submitted that in his fardbeyan the claimant stated that he was discharged from the hospital on 28.9.2004 whereas the discharge slip indicates that he was discharged on 7.5.2004. The court is of the opinion that on such minor contradiction the order passed by Railway Claim Tribunal, Patna Bench cannot be interfered with. Accordingly, the appeal stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)