HiGH COURTQiF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR _N'0^_2360p?200s 1. Rohit Kumar Sahu S/o Late Punu Ram Sahu, Aged about 40 years, Rj'o Viiiage Angari, P.S.-Baiod, Dist: Durg - (C.G.) 2. Madan Lal Gond, S/o Punu Qond, Aged about 62 years, R/o Viiiage Angari, P.S.-Baioa', Tehsii-Baiod, Dist : Durg - (C.G.) Versus 1. ', State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Revenue Secretary, Revenue Depanmeni, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.). 2. The Gram Vikas Samiti Angari, Through - President Shri Danush Ram Sahu, Gram Angari, Tehsii - Balod, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) 3. The Cotiector Durg, Dist : Durg (C.G.) 4. The Sub Divisionai Officer Durg, Dist: Durg (C.G.) 5 Ths Nayab Tehsildar Durg, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) 6 The Board of Revenue iaspur-(C.G.) K IWr FETITiON UMOER ARTiCLE 22S/227 OF' (SB : Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Present:- Shri Rakesh Sahu, Advocate for ihe petltioner. Shri V.ivek Sharma, Panei iawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on fh!s27irda¥ofAugust,2007) 'i. The peutioners, in para 5.11 and para 10 of the petition, aver that against the order dated 25.10.2004 (Annexure P/8) passed by the Sub-Divisionat Offjcer, Balod, the petitioners had preferred an appeal before the Board of Revenue on 27.1.2005. The same is pending consideration. bii: an -\ ^?} 2. In view of the fact that ihe peationers have already availeci remedy or staiutory appeal by filing an appeal before the Board of Revenue, this Court cannot exercise extraordinary jurisdiction, as the petitioner cannot pursue the same remedy before the Board of Revenue as wel! as before this Court under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of India. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dlsmissed as not maintainable, No astocosts. , ___--— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn B'-