IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33383 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.K.PRAKASAN, S/O.KUNJAYYAPPAN, AGED 43 YEARS, CHEMMAPPULLY HOUSE, PERINGOTTUKARA DESHAM, KIZHUPPULLIKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS SRI.V.N.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE DEPT. OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ARMED POLICE BATTALIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.33383 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of suspension issued to the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the suspension itself is without any basis. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. After hearing both sides, I am not inclined to interfere with the suspension as such. However, having initiated disciplinary proceedings by a suspension, it is only appropriate that the respondents complete the disciplinary proceedings expeditiously. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to see that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner by issuing Ext.P8 order of suspension are completed, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2