:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4544 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1262 OF 2004 Kalu @ Sharwansingh Manoharsingh Shekhawat .. Applicant. v/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Ms.Pranali Kakade for applicant. Ms.Usha Kejariwal, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 4th March, 2005 P.C. Heard Ms.Pranali Kakade, the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. 2. There is direct evidence of PW1 Gany Shaikh. He lodged the first information report immediately after the incident. The ocular testimony of Gany Shaikh finds support from the medical evidence. At this stage, therefore, it cannot be said that there is no legal evidence against the accused-applicant. 3. No case for grant of bail is made out. Criminal application for bail is, accordingly, rejected. (R.M. LODHA, J.) :2: (R.S. MOHITE, J.)