BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N.BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15667 of 2011 AMUTHA : PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.85/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.RAMADHAS Advocate For Respondent : Mr. C.RAMESH Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who has been arrayed as A-2 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 468, 471 I.P.C in Crime No.85 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation that A-1 is said to have forged the document and executed in favour of the A-2, the petitioner herein. It is contended by the learned counsel that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the allegation that A- 1 is said to have forged the document and executed in favour of the A-2, the petitioner herein. He further submitted the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. The fact remains that the main allegation is made against A- 1, as stated above. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the allegation is borne out by records and documents, this Court is of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. In view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner being a lady she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, NAGERCOIL. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. M.RAMADHAS Advocate SR.No.44694 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15667 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 NSV/21.12.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/