IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.470 of 2008 BIJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- MJC No.1476 of 2008 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEY Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1464 of 2008 PROF. BISHWAMBHAR DAYAL DIKSHIT Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.2051 of 2008 PROF.(DR.)MONI KUMAR DAS Versus THE T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1462 of 2008 SANJAY KUMAR JHA Versus THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY&ORS ----------- MJC No.1465 of 2008 PROF.(DR.) KEDAR NATH RAI Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1466 of 2008 DR. GANESHA NAND JHA Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1467 of 2008 PROF.(DR.)RAM DINESH SHARMA Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY &ORS ----------- MJC No.1469 of 2008 PROF.(DR.) RAGHUNATH SAH 2 Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1470 of 2008 DR.(SMT.) GAYATRI DEVI Versus TRE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1473 of 2008 SUDHIR CHANDRA KUMAR Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1275 of 2008 PROF.(DR.) PARMA NAND SINGH Versus THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1591 of 2008 DASHRATH MISHRA Versus THE T.M BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1463 of 2008 PROF.(DR.)SHARDA SINHA Versus THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY&ORS ----------- MJC No.1468 of 2008 PROF.(DR.) DINESH CHANDRA JHA Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1472 of 2008 PROF. SADANAND ROY 'SWADU' Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- MJC No.1897 of 2008 DR. ROMA MITRA Versus THE T.M. BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 3 07/ 11.05.2009 In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 4.5.2009, passed in these matters, the admitted arrears of retiral dues has been credited in the account of the petitioners, as is evident from the certificate granted by the Senior Manager of the Bhagalpur University Branch of Allahabad Bank dated 11.5.2009. Counsel for the petitioners, however, contend that the reasoned order and the calculation chart in compliance of the orders of the Writ Court have not been furnished to the writ petitioners in whose account admitted retiral dues have been credited. Let the competent functionary of the University hear the petitioners or their representatives and pass reasoned order on their representation within one month of the date of hearing. The date of hearing is fixed for 5th June, 2009. The State Government will ensure audit of the account of the petitioners, as early as possible, in any case within reasonable time, which is three months from the date, the Auditors are relieved from the election duty. With the aforesaid observations and directions, these contempt applications are disposed of. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)