1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 138 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 134 OF 2005 Anil S. Naitam & Another Vs. Sunik Mallik & Others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. M. Kadukar Adv for petitioner. Mr. C. S. Kaptan Adv for respondent-3. Mr. A. D. Sonak AGP for respondent 2. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 29 th JUNE, 2010. An affidavit on behalf of respondent no.3 is tendered and it is informed that the matter is referred to Project Officer for verification of objections and it is yet to be decided. It is also inform, proposal for approval to the appointment of both petitioners are also submitted to the Project Officer and on 25.06.2010 the proposals are submitted with the available record to the Assistant Commissioner 2 Nagpur. 2. Having heard the counsel and perusal of above referred affidavit, the delay on the part of management in forwarding the proposal is obvious. Petitioners are put to financial losses and also mental stress. The management shall pay to each of the petitioners an amount of Rs. 10,000/- within a month from today. In the light of the affidavit referred above, contempt petition disposed of. Needless to add that respondent no.2, the Project Officer shall scrupulously deal with the proposal, and if any deficiencies are noticed, it will be for the management to comply the same without any demur. JUDGE svk 3