IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3144 of 2011 MAHENDRA TIWARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 407/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner being the truck owner that his truck was carrying 199.80 quintals of wheat of the informant but it could not reach to the consignee. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the petitioner lodged a case against the local police officials, hence, the police maliciously implicated the petitioner in the present case. The petitioner has also filed money suit against the police. Learned counsel for the informant, however, submits that the petitioner is the truck owner and in connivance with the driver he has misappropriated the food grains of the 2 informant. Admittedly, there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner was party to agreement to carry the wheat in question. Considering the contractual nature of accusation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)