HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPMS No. 241 of 2009 Pushker Singh and others …. Petitioners Versus District Magistrate, Champawat …. Respondent Mr. Ganesh Kandpal learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent. 19th February, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners limits his prayer that since he has made a representation for redressal of his grievance before the District Magistrate, Champawat (Annexure 5 to the writ petition), the same may be decided by the concerned authority. For this he prays for a direction. The prayer seems to be innocuous. The District Magistrate, Champawat is hereby directed that in case such a representation has been filed before him, the same shall be decided by him expeditiously. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 19.2.2009 Avneet 2