(1) (20) WP 3168/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk WRIT PETITION NO. 3168 OF 2011 Kedar Subhash Nirokhekar .. Petitioner Vs. Shreyya Kedar Nirokhekar .. Respondent Ms. Chandana Salgaonkar for the Petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Vyas for the Respondent. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 9 th JUNE, 2011. P.C. 1. The Petitioner-husband has challenged the order of interim maintenance granted to the wife on 28.02.2011 by Family Court No.3, Pune. The wife as well as husband are working. The wife earned Rs.9,000/- at the time of application. The husband was stated to be earning 75,000/- p.m. The disparity between the income of the parties is rather large. When the application came up for hearing, the wife earned about Rs.19,000/-. The husband could have earned only more. He claimed to be earning less. He submitted a salary slip of Rs.54,000/- before the Court. He did not produce the latest salary slip as called upon. He is Computer Consultant. The learned Judge has specifically observed that the husband "purposefully" produced the salary slip of December, 2009 and recent salary slip was not produced. 2. The precise aspect to be considered was the increase in the salary of the parties. Both are salaried workers. The husband relies upon the increase in the salary of his wife. He must produce all his salary slips (2) (20) WP 3168/11 to show increase or decrease of the salary. He has purposefully not done so. The order, therefore cannot faulted. It cannot be interfered in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. Of course, if the husband can show further salary slips, it would be considered at the final hearing of the Petition in the Family Court. The Advocate for the Respondent-wife shall be entitled to file Vakalatnama within one month. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)