IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1123 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 2.3.2009 Hawa Singh ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Kalawati and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by learned Court below dated January 31, 2009, whereby the application filed by the respondents/defendants for setting aside ex-parte decree against them was allowed. Learned Court below allowed the application considering the fact that to justify the report of refusal of the defendants, the petitioner had not examined the process server who was the material witness. Still further even in the cross-examination of RW-1 Hawa Singh, it is stated that Brijesh who was one of the defendant and was stated to be present at the spot was infact married and was living at that time at her in laws house. She is stated to have refused to accept the summons. Keeping the aforesaid fact in view, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The revision petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 2.3.2009 JUDGE Reema