IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3181 of 2011 RITWIK RAJ @ RITWIK KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.01.2011. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and after having perused the impugned order and finding that the statement of the girl was not recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the court does not find any reason to interfere with the present order. However, as soon as the charges are framed, the courts should ensure that within a couple of months the victim is produced before it for evidence, and if she does not support the prosecution case, then the court shall examine the doctor who had medically examined her and assessed her age and if it comes in evidence that by adding three years to the age assessed by the doctor, the age would be above 18 years, no further evidence shall be taken and the judgments shall be delivered. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)