82wp627.11.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 627 of 2011 (Uttam Pulses Pvt. Ltd. vs. SICOM Ltd. and anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D. D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ. Date : 08/02/2011. Heard Mr.A.T.Purohit, Adv. for the petitioner and Mr.A.V.Khare, Adv. for the respondents. This petition is directed against the notice dt. 24.12.2010 issued by respondent no.1 whereby the petitioner was called upon to pay the amount of Rs.3,59,70,133/- with interest thereon from 22.12.2010 on or before 16.1.2011. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in the first para of the impugned notice dt. 24.12.2010, a mention has been made to the earlier demand notice dt. 8.12.2010 whereby the petitioner was called upon to pay the outstanding amount only to the tune of Rs.1,79,74,329/-; however, by the impugned notice, which is issued within 82wp627.11.odt 2 . a short time, the petitioner was called upon to make a huge payment of Rs.3,59,70,133/- and therefore, the notice is bad in law. We have specifically asked the learned Counsel for the petitioner whether there is an averment in the petition that the amount of Rs.3,59,70,133/-, as demanded by respondent no.1 in the impugned notice dt. 24.12.2010, was never due and payable. But, the learned Counsel is completely silent in this regard. There is also no statement in the petition in this regard. In that view of the matter, we do not propose to show any indulgence in the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE jais