IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.976 OF 2009 In the matter of Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 And In the matter of Vijay Silk House (Delhi) Limited a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at 4/27, Kamal Mansion, 1st Floor, Arthur Bunder Road, Colaba, Mumbai – 400 005. And In the matter of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Vijay Silk House (Tirupur) Limited and Vijay Silk House (Delhi) Limited with Vinayak Nirman Private Limited. M/s. Vijay Silk House (Delhi) Limited ) a Company incorporated under the ) Companies Act, 1956 and having its ) registered office at 4/27, Kamal Mansion, ) 1st Floor, Arthur Bunder Road, ) Colaba, Mumbai – 400 005. ) … Applicant 1 CALLED FOR SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION Coram: S. J. Kathawalla J. Date: 18th September, 2009 Mr. J. P. Sen, i/b. Federal & Rashmikant, Advocates for the Applicant MINUTES OF ORDER UPON the Application of the Applicant Company abovenamed by the Summons for Directions & UPON HEARING Mr. J. P. Sen, i/b. Federal & Rashmikant, Advocates for the Applicant Company and UPON READING the Affidavit dated 9th September, 2009 of Mr. Dilkush R. Doshi, Director of the Applicant Company in Support of the Summons for Direction AND the Exhibits therein referred to; IT IS ORDERED THAT:- (1) The convening and holding of the Meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company for the purpose of considering and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s), the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation between Vijay Silk House (Tirupur) Ltd. and Vijay Silk House (Delhi) Ltd. with Vinayak Nirman Private Ltd. is dispensed with in view of the consent given by all the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company which 2 are annexed as Exhibits “J-1” to “J-9” to the Affidavit in support of the Summons for Direction. (2) There are no Creditors, secured or otherwise, of the Applicant Company as mentioned in paragraph No.16 of the in Support of Summons for Direction. Hence the question of convening and holding the meeting of Creditors does not arise. COMPANY JUDGE 3