IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2010 / 19TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 26601 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- P.K.RAJAN ,S/O.GOVINDAN, ADARSHA NIVAS, CHERUMAVILAYI PO,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SRI.RASHIM RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 3. THE DISTRICT POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, KANNUR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS DIVISION, KANNUR. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.26601/10 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT NO.D4.TC-7/1- DT 24.3.2010 ENTEREED INTO BETWEEN THE PETIITONER AND THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 21.06.2010 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED ONE MR.NARAYANANKUTTY ON 19.7.2010 UNDER THE RTI ACT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DT 23.7.2010 RECEIVED FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH respondent DT 27.7.2010 ALONG WIT THE COMPLAINT RECEIVED FROM RE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS ACTION COMMITTEE. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF the DIRECTIONS RECEIVED BY THE 2ND respondent ON 26.5.2010 FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 22.6.2010. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND AND 4TH RESPONDENTS ON 12.8.2010. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 26601 OF 2010 (A) ===================== Dated this the 11th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner who has entered into a contract for collection of toll at Mammakunnu Kadavu Bridge in Kannur District for the period from 01/04/2010 to 31/3/2011 has filed Ext.P8 representation to the 4th respondent requesting for modification of the agreement conditions or for providing facilities enabling him to collect the toll in the manner that he has mentioned in the representation. 2. In this writ petition, counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction for consideration of the said representation. Having regard to the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, leaving it entirely open to the 4th respondent to decide the issue, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to pass orders on Ext.P8, which the 4th respondent shall do with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp