IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1216 of 2011 SUNAINA DEVI @ SIMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 2 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the state. The petitioner seeks her bail in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No. 28 of 2009 registered under sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/ 4 of the D.P. Act. Admittedly, the petitioner is Gutani of the deceased. Furthermore, it is apparent from perusal of the F.I.R. itself that marriage of the deceased had taken place six years ago and after marriage he had given birth to two children. Furthermore, it is apparent from the record that on 5.7.2009 informant got a telephonic message that his daughter was done to death by her in-laws. After that he went there and burnt dead body of the deceased was recovered. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused Badan Yadav has already been granted privilege of bail by this court vide order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 13399/2010 and case of the petitioner more or less stands on similar footing. He further submits that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has wrongly observed that bail prayer of the petitioner has been rejected up to this court and as a matter of fact, petitioner had preferred Cr. Misc. no. 26976/2010 for grant of anticipatory bail but subsequently, aforesaid criminal miscellaneous case was dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as - 2 - submissions of the parties, the petitioner, Sunaina Devi @ Sima is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No. 28 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara. Shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)