ax HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 379 of2009 ‘ ! PETITIONER : Maria Lina Kindo w/o Amrit Lal Toppo, aged ‘ * about 4O years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primary [School Keshavpur, $01111 Ambiképur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ' VERSUS REjéPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattlsgafh, Through Secretary School Educatlon Department Mnnstry D K S Bhawan Ra1pur LhHa’msgarh 2. The Dlstnct Educatlon OEmer Ambxkapur Dxstnct Amblkapur (Sarguga) Chhattlsgarh ‘ 3. he Blo Ecat O$c Amb1kapu1 snct 1ar Sagu haxsr 1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22o OF THE CONSTI] U I ION OF WDIA ' ~ SB. Hon’ble Shn Satlsh K. Agmhotrl, . Pe ayant K R da for the xon reqnt Shn C J ao Avocte petlter Sn Y S Tkr epy Adat neral or t /rdes h hau Dut voce Ge f he Stateesponnt (Passd on 16E; dy of Far 2009) e a ebruy, 1 1 Wht en f ned ouel pear f th pas h matr g‘ . ‘ it'he const o lear cns apmg or e rtie, te te ear final s‘hd ly 2. % IA No 1 Th 1s an aplctlon f tki oens o cod ‘ . xs pia or ang dcumt n rer The < patlo ered a prayd for aphcn 1s ord s e r counse appea for the petitone subm that the peitio i; ed o g f tw m as h s taed DEd£ s ntitle t rant o o increents se ha ‘obin .. tifcate her own exnses durin the servce erio earn cel mrthe subm a the ter m b aed lery i ntn to he utits fo gan f tw ie: nake a represeatio t ahorie r rt o o ncrments L nrsan o mt and de pssd by s ot the r f ‘ put t the judgen orr ae thi Cur in matte o Yhshwant Kumar Bharadwaj v Municipai Corporation Dttrg and, 7" ’v another and W P (S ) No 4130 of 2005 Govesh Kumar Verma vs The; State Govt ofCkhomsgarh and another /'/, T ck duwn er Dit Ambkpu (rga) Chttgah ORAL ORDER f‘ 3. Leaned l ring ir its tneri ceri on pe g i pd. Led ouns l r its tht peition ay e gm ibt to 2'06 ‘ % 4.: ? The State Government is under an obligation to follow the law settled by this Couxt and it is not necessary to approach this Court by each and every employee when the law has already been settled by this Court. The employees, who are similarly situated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at par with: other employees, who have approached this Court. It is not necessary to approach this Courtfor similar order. In View of the foregoing reasons this petition stands disposed of with l1bertv reserved to the petitioner on the request of learned counsel to make a representation Ifthe 1epresentatron 1s tiled by the petitioner the same may be consrdered and decided in accordance With law on its own merit as expeditiously as posstble preferably Within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation ' l ‘7 i Sd/_ i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge , l i i l l t