IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40135 of 2009 SK.AZAD, son of Sk. Shahadat, resident of Madhopur, P.S. Gaunaha, District West Champaran Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation u/s 307 and other allied offences of the Indian Penal Code and a direct complicity of the petitioner on account of his being said to have given a number of chhura injuries on the person of the informant, which gets partly substantiated from the injury report, this Court would not be inclined to grant bail to the petitioner as it is not impressed with that part of the submission of the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had a reason to do so and in the heated moment when he came to know that the petitioner had tried to develop intimacy with the sister of the petitioner he became enraged and had assaulted which led to fall of the petitioner on the ground and sustaining of some injuries. The prayer for bail is, therefore, rejected. 2 The police in fact seems to have taken out chaff from the grain and has rightly found the mother of the petitioner to have not played role in that but that will not mean that the entire allegation of assault which stands corroborated from the injury report also is false. The petitioner is in custody since 8.10.2009 and therefore, he may renew his prayer for bail after completing one year of his judicial custody. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/