1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1940 OF 2005 Suresh Dhondiram Kadam & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. S.P. Thorat for the Petitioners Mrs. J.S. Pawar, Additional Government Pleader, for Respondents No. 1 and 4. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J., & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. DATE: APRIL 25, 2006. P.C.:- 1. It will be open to the petitioners to make appropriate suggestions to provide drinking water to the villagers of Sangola Taluka. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that a scheme has been prepared by the petitioners for providing adequate supply of drinking water to the villagers. Along with the suggestions and representation, the petitioners shall send the scheme to respondent No. 3. As and when the representation/ scheme is presented to respondent No. 3, the same shall be considered in its proper perspective, and 2 the decision that will be taken shall be communicated to the petitioners as expeditiously as possible. 2. With the above observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.