1 wp2217.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 2217 OF 2010 Shri Pandit Balkrishna Bobate & ors. ...Petitioners v/s. Dyandev Dattu Kumbhar ...Respondent Mr. C.G. Patil for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Walvekar for the respondent. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- FEBRUARY 14, 2011. P.C. By consent the Petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. The Petition challenges the concurrent finding of fact at the prima- facie stage of grant of injunction. The injunction has been granted by the Learned Trial Court which is confirmed by the Appellate Court. The injunction is operating for a period of last more than two years. 2 wp2217.10.sxw 3. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the concurrent orders. I am of the considered view that interest of justice would be met by directing the Learned Trial Court to decide the suit itself as expeditiously as possible and in any way within a period of six months from today. 4. Rule disposed of with aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. 5. Needless to state that observations made by the Learned Trial Court and the Appellate Court would not be taken into consideration by the Learned Trial Court while deciding the suit on its own merits. (B.R. GAVAI, J)