Civil Revision No. 7105 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 7105 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 21.11.2011 Surinder Singh and others ....Petitioners Vs. Rachhpal Kaur and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. H.S. Dhandi, Advocate, for the petitioners. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 09.11.2011 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala, partly allowing the application filed by the appellants-petitioners (hereinafter referred as 'the petitioners') for leading additional evidence by way of producing the demarcation report and declining to examine the photographer. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the Appellate Court has allowed the petitioner to place on record the certified copy of the demarcation report dated 17.04.2010, but the said report was to be proved by Halqa Kanungo Kasba, therefore, the Court should not have only allowed to tender the demarcation report, but should have permitted the petitioners to examine the said witness in order to prove the said fact. The application to prove photographs has been declined for the Civil Revision No. 7105 of 2011 (O&M) 2 reason that since the photographs were lying on the file, then why the same could not be proved. In this regard, it may be observed that the photographs could not be proved without examining the photographer, who was to prove the photographs with the aid of negatives. As such, this petition is accepted, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioners are permitted to lead additional evidence, as prayed for, subject to payment of ` 5000/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this Court for recalling this order. (A.N.JINDAL) November 21, 2011 JUDGE ajp