1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 441/2011 Vinayak Manikrao Dange VERSUS State of Mah. And others. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 11 , 2011 . Heard Shri Vaishnav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Dharmadhikari, the learned Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri Jagtap, the learned counsel for respondent no.4. The respondent no.1 has not committed any error in partly allowing the revision application filed by the respondent no.4 and permitting the respondent no. 4 to operate the CL-III license which was initially operated by the partnership of the respondent no.4 and his father with 80% and 20% share respectively. The respondent no. 1 rightly held that the suspension of the licence pending the dispute between the parties was not proper as it would have caused loss to the Govt. and also because of the fact that the respondent No. 4 was running the CL-III licence since years together. Considering the fact that the respondent No.4 had 80% share in the partnership firm and he was running the CL- III license for years together, the respondent no. 1 did not commit any error in passing the impugned order dated 2 26.6.2009. It is informed to this court by the learned Assistant Govt. Pleader that the order has been implemented and the respondent No. 4 started running the CL-III licence immediately after the impugned order was passed. For the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Hirekhan