FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1368 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1608 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1368 OF 2002 Ramesh Asaram Raut .... Appellant (Advocate for the appellant- Mr. Rohan Darandale i/by. Mr. R.S. Datar) VERSUS Sangita B. Raut and Ors. ..... Respondents (Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3 : Mr. Anilkumar Patil) Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders _____________________________________________________________________ CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 15 March, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The consent terms signed by the parties and their respective advocates are taken on file and marked X’ for ‘ identification. Mr. Patil, states that he has filed separate Vakalatnama for respondents no.2 and 3 in view of they having attained majority. In view of the consent terms, the appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and decree is set aside. No order as to costs. 2. In view of disposal of First Appeal, Civil Application No. 1608 of 2004 does not survive. The same is disposed off as infructuous. [JUDGE]