1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 863 OF 2009 Mukat Tanks and Vessels Private Limited ).. Petitioners Versus Kotak Mahindra Bank and others ).. Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain i/b C.J. Law for the Petitioners. Mr. Kishore Jain a/w Mr. Dureesh Khanapurkar i/b M.K. Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr. Mannadiar i/b Mannadiar & Co. for Respondent No.6. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 8TH JULY 2009. P.C. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 submits that the Petitioners have not furnished their account number as a result of which the amount lying with them has not been credited in the account. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the account number of the Petitioner is “Current A/c No.006305000011” with ICIC Bank Ltd., Boisar Branch, Boisar. In view of the above statement made and since the learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 Bank has no objection, we direct that the entire amount along with the interest payable should be deposited within one week from today in the above mentioned 2 account. Immediately, on receipt of the said amount, the Petitioners shall deposit the amount with the Registry of the Debt Recovery Tribunal as well as make up the deficiency, if there is any shortfall, to the extent of Rs.2.5 crores. Upon such deposit being made with the Registry of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the Appeal shall be heard finally by the Tribunal expeditiously. If there is any fixed deposit receipt issued by Respondent No.6, which is produced by the Petitioners, the interest shall be governed by the terms of the fixed deposit. These directions are without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. 2. Writ Petition disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.