IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.2500 of 2009 Between: K. Raghava Reddy … Petitioner And Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, rep., by its Vice-Chairman & Housing Commissioner, M.J. Road, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G. Sekhar Reddy for Sri P. Gangarami Reddy This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2500 of 2009 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in registering the plot No.23 situated at Gatchibowli in the name of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to take further action for registration of Plot No.23 situated at Gatchibowli in the name of the petitioner.” At the hearing, Sri G. Sekhar representing Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the allotment of plot in favour of the petitioner was cancelled and the said order was questioned in WP.No.3646 of 2009. In view of the above facts, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue WP.No.3646 of 2009. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.2193 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 02.06.2009 ES