THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 546 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No. 890 of 2009 in O.S.No. 981 of 2007, dated 6.11.2009. Brief facts of the revision are that: 1st Respondent herein is the plaintiff, who filed O.S.No. 981 of 2007 before the lower Court against the petitioner herein, who is the defendant No.1 and also against the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein, who are the defendant Nos. 2 to 4. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the lower Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. Before the learned trial Court, the petitioner-defendant filed I.A.No. 890 of 2009 to condone the delay of 253 days in filing the set aside petition. As can be seen from the order under revision that the learned trial Court after hearing the plaintiff and also after hearing the defendant No.3 and also after an elaborate trial the suit was decreed. But the attitude of the petitioner-defendant No.1 is only seems to be to avoid the salary deduction of the defendant No.3 and for that purpose only the present petition has been filed. Under these circumstances, I do not find any merits in the Civil Revision Petition and accordingly, the revision is not maintainable. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 8.4.2010 CHV