IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17036 of 2010 YASWANT PRASAD SINGH SON OF LATE KAPILDEO PD. SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MUJBAR TAL, P.S. MANIHARI, DISTRICT KATIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PURNEA DIVISION, PURNEA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KATIHAR. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER, KATIHAR. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KADWA, KATIHAR. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SAMELI, KATIHAR. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KATIHAR. 7. THE DIRECTOR, PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA. 8. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, KATIHAR. 9. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA. ----------- 2 06.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of April 2010, from the post of Panchayat Sevak from Kataihar Block. However, retiral dues as highlighted in this writ application have not been settled besides certain arrears of salary. Learned counsel for the State submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although petitioner has represented his grievances by filing of representation contained in Annexure 3 series, However, for expeditious disposal of his pending claims, petitioner proposes to file 2 a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 with a copy to respondent nos. 4,5,6,8 and 9 stating distinctly details of the unpaid claims within a period of four weeks. In view of the above, in case such representation is filed, the above respondents shall consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. AMRENDRA/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)