^ 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. S'2-2— SSaiCTifl ^'^;'.^-EW:> Ho?3?°;' ^i ^,? ..i^ i: y 'nj' u / 2006 PETITIONER "yv^l^ r' ^••"^:'^'^^"" ^A>^3-"" rf>-" RESPONDENTS Suryakant Sahu S/o Late Puranderlal Sahu, aged about 33 years, R/o- Vilage- Rodhri, Distt- Dhaintri. (C.G). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary General adininistrative Departinent D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh y^i^hrough: Secretary 'Department Of Higher Education D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.) ^ Ravishankar University °'"^^^ SHES.c c» ft>- )ur (C.G.) '*' 4. The Principal Govt. Polytechnic College Post-Rudhri, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Union of India Through: Secretary Department of Personal public grievance and Personnel third floor loknayak bhawan , khan inarket, New Delhi WRIT PETITION U/A 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IHDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION ORDER TQ DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER r XI-HC-22 TSI .~>.i!.i||ci<<, ®Ti1wis.fawi'yy 17 311^1^1 ft-fi'* 311^1 **<!<* 'sfev opi p>(t<H-u.t^ sn^r ^^irar ^afer Petitioner by Shri Sanjay Agn Shri S.P. Kate, Govfc Adro. foi Shri S.K.,Beriwal, Staadm^ With conseat, heard finaUy. This case relates to coinpass deafh pfan einployee serving in th( Leanied. co'unsel for ttie petij of the eniployee has occurred on| earlier. It is further subniitted No. 1322/ 2002 involvmg the, same Court ofi 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Leamed couiisel for the Ste states that the State of Cfaliattisi 'cases of dependaats of fhose emi strictly in accordance with: fhe p Sllbiuits tliat foui- nionths time for In view of the subinissions ij partics, with.out expressing aay o^ opinion of this Court, ends ofjusl fhe S.tate of Chhattisgarh aad tih| decide the case of the petttioaer i(; the tune of death of the eniployee appointnieiit orders wiU be issuec^ m.onfhs froiafb:edateof.product( petitioner is also directed to rende^ inade clear that if aay grievance reiaedv available under tlie law i(i Court. Wifh the aforesaid observatict' Certified copy as per rules. Copy to fhe. State counsel, order to fhe responderits for com.pl|i spi.<4l(vl41l iTFRTf ^ fe^ .Tf^i^i< .^i'3fPgH3Ili?I. ' ^wal,Advocate. — |the State. tounsel for Union of India. jionate appointment consequent upofl. tfae State. • |tioher categorically stated fhat, the death 8-9-20QQ i.e. after 1-11-1997 aad not that in bateh of cases bearing W.P. ^uestion orders havebeen passed by fhis piat sinular orders inay be passed iQ. this tte does not dispute the above fact and fcrh has takeu a decision to coasiderthe ^loyees wfio died on or after 1/11/1997 blicy prevalent at ffaat tune. He however Issuiug iiecessar)' oixlers va.ay be given. tade by learuedcounsel appeaEing for the |?inion on ftie nierits of the case, tu the •e wiU.be sep/ed ifa du-ection is given to authorities concemed tQ consider ahd 1 accordaiice with the policy preyalent at toncemed. If ttie petitioner foiuid eligible, as early as possible preferably within. 4 lon/receipt of a copy of this order. The due co-operation tQ the aufhorities. It is itilt reinains, t}ie petitioner may avail fhe icluduig fBiag. of the petition:before fhis ns, tliis petitiou stands disposed of. who wUl be obliged to coraxnuiticate the lance. . _.__.___— Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge 4i'^ V-fS^