IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2008 / 9TH ASHADHA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2137 of 2008() ------------------------------ CMP.3080/2008 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, VADAKKANCHERY .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- SUNIL, S/O.RAMACHANRAN, THAZHETHUVEETIL HOUSE, CHITTANDA. BY ADV. SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. S.I.OF POLICE, CHERUTHURUTHI, WADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVINDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ====================================== CRL.R.P. NO.2137 OF 2008 ====================================== Dated this the 30th day of June 2008 ORDER Petitioner, who claims to be the registered owner of a mini lorry bearing Reg.No.KL-10 D/4023 challenges the order dated 4.6.2008 passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vadakkancherry dismissing his application (CMP 3080/2008) filed under Section 457 Cr.P.C. seeking interim custody of the said lorry. One of the reasons given by the magistrate is that the same vehicle has been continuously used for illegal transportation of sand. This is a very relevant consideration justifying the refusal of interim custody of the vehicle. I see no grounds to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial court. This revision is dismissed. Dated this the 30th day of June, 2008 V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE css/