IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15056 of 2009 BASANT KUMAR SON OF SRI SHYAM MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MADUA, P.S. HISUA, DISTRICT - NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the F.I.R. is against unknown persons. However, the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Rabindra Prasad. Learned counsel for the State submits that during investigation, co-accused Rabindra Prasad has clearly stated about the manner of participation of this petitioner in killing the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J) Jagdish/