1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3623 OF 2008 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5141 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2389 OF 2007 Sarojini Kochu Krishnan : Applicant. Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and anr. : Respondents. Applicant Sarojini Kochu Krishnan in person. Shri.J.J.Xavier, for Respondent No.1. Mr.A.A.Siddiqui with Mr.Washim Khan for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J DATED : AUGUST 21, 2008 P.C. 1. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for vacating the interim order dated 30.10.2007 which is in the nature of directing the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the property in question. 2 2. The said order was passed after hearing the Applicant above named. There are no change of circumstances made out by the Applicant for vacating the said order. Since the Applicant is a Senior Citizen, the hearing of the above First Appeal was expedited. 3. In my view, therefore, it would be appropriate to fix the above First Appeal for final hearing. The First Appeal is therefore fixed for final hearing on 13.10.2008. The Applicant, who is appearing in person, is desirous of engaging an advocate. She may do so before the said date. In the context of the nature of the lis between the parties it would also be necessary that apart from the order of status quo, the original Appellant is directed not to part with possession or create third party interest in the property in question, pending hearing and final disposal of the above First Appeal. The Appellant is also directed to file private paper book encompassing all the relevant pleadings and documents which are the part of the record. The above Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J]