IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.726 of 2005 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 02, 2009 S.Daulat Singh .....PETITIONER Versus S. Chand Singh ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Mr.Gurcharan Singh Bains, Advocate, for Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sarjit Singh, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Poonam Sambhar, Advocate, for the respondent. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) This revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff-decree holder against the order of the Executing Court whereby it was held that no amount can be recovered more than double of the principal amount. The plaintiff and the defendant are real brothers. On the last date of hearing, this Court requested the counsel for the parties to ask both the parties to remain present in the Court so that between the brothers an amicable settlement can take place. In pursuance thereof, both the brothers are present in Court. I have heard both the parties also. The petitioner has graciously accepted the offer of the Court and states that he has received a sum of Rs.44,000/- and he leaves his other claim and states that the decree deem to be satisfied. In view of the said amicable settlement with the intervention of the Court, the revision petition is dismissed. September 02, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE