THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2447 of 2011 Dated 08th February, 2011 Between: Rapole Sugunamma …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary for Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Pulla Rao Yellanki Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4: Sri P.Raghavender Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in disposing of the appeal preferred by the petitioner treating it as of civil nature vide proceedings No.798/2010-B (pts) dated 18.08.2010, the appeal having been preferred against the order of the 4th respondent passed in proceedings No.17-93/C in favour of Smt.Rapolu Chandrabaga/Respondent No.5 without waiting for the mandatory period of 30 days for effecting mutation and consequently mutation in the name of Rapolu Madhu/Respondent No.6 as illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and Article 21 & 300-A Constitution of India and set aside the orders of the 2nd and 4th Respondents and consequently set aside the order of the 4th respondent proceedings No.G.PN/8/2009-10 dated 04.06.2010.” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri Pulla Rao Yellanki, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his client to pursue O.S.No.22 of 2010 pending in the Court of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Nakrekal. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.3042 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th February, 2011 VGB