1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.3625 OF 2008 (PRAMOD DEORAO GHULE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.D.Chopde, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.P.Thakare, A.P.P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : OCTOBER 17, 2008. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. 2. The applicant, who is alleged to have committed rape upon one 19 years old prosecutrix in respect of which report was given five months after the incident, seeks pre-arrest bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned counsel appraises in aid a judgment of this Court in Sunil Laxman Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported at 2007 ALL MR (Cri) 1693. 2 3. Facts in that case are quite different and in these peculiar facts anticipatory bail was granted. The prosecutrix in that case was 27 years old law student and perpetrator was 26 years old; the parties had gone on a long journey, stayed in a hotel etc. Such are not the facts of the present case. In the instant case, on the pretext that he would marry the applicant had been committing rape upon the prosecutrix and eventually backed out. Let the investigation be over. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE RR.