IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 205 of 2011 Balbeer Singh Chauhan and another ……… Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate with Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, Assistant Government Advocate (Govt. of Uttarakhand) for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Date of Order: 23.03.2011 BARIN GHOSH, CHIEF JUSTICE On the hypothesis that the allegations against the petitioners are absurd, measured on the standard of perception of the petitioners, the present petition has been filed, challenging the First Information Report. In the body of the petition, petitioners have accepted the fact that they are in the habit of meddling with the affairs of others. 2. In the circumstances, at the instance of the petitioners, this Court is incompetent to come to the conclusion that the matters alleged in the First Information Report are so improbable that the Court can interfere. It is significant to note that in the application, petitioners have not mentioned a word about themselves, except accepting the fact that they are so habituated. 3. That being the situation, no case has been made out for intervention. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed at the threshold. 4. In the event the petitioners cooperate with the investigation, it is hoped and expected that the Investigator shall give due regard thereto. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 23.03.2011 Amit