IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4305 of 2009 SUKRA URAON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 21.05.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the State as also the Administrator, Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board. It is submitted that the petitioner was an employee of the Agriculture Department of the State Government. He was sent on deputation to the Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board. His services never came to be absorbed in the Marketing Board and he retained his lien in the parent Department of Agriculture. The submission is that therefore he remained a government servant on deputation to the Marketing Board. Once the Board has been dissolved and he is being sent back to his parent Department he is entitled to be given work and salary commensurate with the post on which he held his lien. Learned Counsel for the State and the Board have no objection to the disposal of this writ application with directions to the respondents to consider his representation appended at Annexure 12 for allotment of duties and salary on a post commensurate with that on which he held his lien while being on deputation in the Marketing Board. This order is based on the premise of correctness of the submission of the petitioner that there was never any order of the Marketing Board absorbing his services in the Marketing Board when the lien held by him in the Agriculture Department of the State Government would have automatically come to an end. The writ application stands disposed with the aforesaid observations. Let such consideration be done within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)