IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43531 of 2010 MUKESH DOM @ PASI DOM S/O AMIR CHAND DOM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 20.01.2011 this court had considered the merits of the case that the petitioner was the main assailant and thereafter, proceeded to call for a report from the Trial Court about the present stage of trial. The Trial Court has reported that seven witnesses have been examined and only the Informant, Investigating Officer and the Doctor are left to be examined. It has been submitted that despite all modes of processes the informant is not appearing. The Trial Court is directed to furnish the name of the informant, Investigating Officer and the doctor fixing specific dates for their appearance to the S.P., Nalanda, who is directed to ensure the 2 attendance of these three witnesses on the dates specified by the Trial Court. With these observations, the application is disposed off. Let this order be communicated to the S.P., Nalanda through fax at the cost of the state. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)