IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4061 of 2011. Decided on 2.6.2011. Shyam Lal ..…Petitioner. Versus State of H.P and another …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. for the respondents No.1 and 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (oral). The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: a) “That this writ petition may kindly be allowed and writ in the nature of certiorari may be issued and the impugned notification issued by the respondent No.1, dated 2.6.2011 (Annexure P-1) may kindly be quashed and set aside. b) That the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed to consider the case for transfer of the petitioner and the respondent No.3 strictly as per the policy contained in Annexure P-2.” 2. In the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this case, we do not think it necessary to go into the factual details of this case. It is not necessary to issue notice to the third respondent. Petitioner submits that he may be permitted to file a detailed representation before the first respondent within a week from today. In case the petitioner files an appropriate representation, the matter shall be considered by the first respondent with special reference to the submissions as pointed 2 out by him and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken thereon as expeditiously as possible within a period of another one month. In case the petitioner has not been relieved as on today, further proceedings in that regard will be deferred for the time being. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (V.K. Sharma) Judge. 2nd June, 2011. Lsp/cs