CR No.644 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.644 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 01.02.2010 **** Mahla Singh and others . . . . Petitioners VS. Harnam Singh and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.D.K. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. The petitioners have challenged order dated 7.11.2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Faridkot vide which their application dated 16.5.2009 filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) for transfer of Civil Suit titled as “Harnam Singh etc. Vs. Mehla Singh and others” from the Court of Shri Rajiv Kalra, Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Muktsar to some other Court of competent jurisdiction, was dismissed. The application dated 16.5.2009 was filed by the petitioners on the ground that they had seen the plaintiff coming out of the residence of the presiding officer. The learned District Judge dismissed the application, on the ground, that it does not contain material particulars as neither the date nor time has been mentioned CR No.644 of 2010 (O&M) -2- by the defendants/petitioners when they had seen the plaintiff coming out of the residence of the presiding officer nor they have disclosed the date or the person in whose presence plaintiffs had proclaimed about his relations with the presiding officer. The application was found to be totally vague and on this ground the same was dismissed. In the Revision Petition also no details have been given except for repeating the averments made in the application. Hence, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned District Judge while dismissing the application filed by the petitioners. Thus, the present Revision Petition is dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) February 01, 2010 JUDGE vivek