HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.4453 OF 2010 Dt.8.10.2010 Between: P.Chengamma and another ..Petitioners And M.Yasodamma ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH C.R.P.NO.4453 OF 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order in I.A.No.434 of 2010 in O.S.No.1203 of 2003, on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, dated 16.7.2010. Petitioners herein are plaintiffs, who filed O.S.No.1203 of 2003 on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, for grant of permanent injunction. It is stated that the plaint schedule property was purchased by the father of the petitioner in 1961 and they have been in continuous possession and enjoyment of the same and in proof of their possession they have also filed Ex.A-2 i.e., No.3 adangal pahani issued by the Mandal Revenue Inspector, Tirupati. To prove Ex.A-2, the petitioners filed I.A.No.434 of 2010 under Order 16, Rule 7 C.P.C., to sent for the revenue records pertaining to the plaint schedule property and to give evidence by the revenue authorities. The said application has been dismissed on the ground that the application filed by the petitioners is nothing but to secure evidence by summoning the revenue authorities directing them to produce the revenue records pertaining to the plaint schedule property. If any revenue records is required to prove their possession, it is always open for the petitioners to obtain certified copies of the same and if the certified copies are disputed by the other side, then only it is open for the petitioners to summon the revenue authorities with the original documents. In the instant case, the petitioners have already filed A-2. It is not the case of the petitioner that the respondent-defendant is disputing the genuineness or otherwise of the said document. The perusal of the petition goes to show that the said application is not filed for proving Ex.A-2, but for collection of evidence from the revenue authorities. Therefore, the court below rightly dismissed the petition. I do not see any merit in the civil revision petition. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. _________________​ V.ESWARAIAH, J. 8.10.2010 kpr