IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3556 of 2010 Asgar Ali Ansari Versus Lakhi Khan @ Abu Bakar Khan & ----------- 3 25.08.2011 Interlocutory application vide I.A. No. 7543 of 2010 has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the present MJC No. 3556 of 2010 filed for restoration of the Second Appeal No. 54 of 2002 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 15.07.2003. By the aforesaid order the petitioner was allowed three weeks’ time to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter. One of the defects which the petitioner could not remove was for providing the parentage of the respondent nos. 2 & 3 of the said appeal. Considering the submissions and the grounds stated in the aforesaid interlocutory application, the delay in filing the present MJC No. 3556 of 2010 is condoned subject the objections, if any, of the concerned respondents of the second appeal on their appearance. As regards the restoration, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the parentage of the respondent nos. 2 & 3 could not be supplied for the reason that even in the plaint of the original suit there is no mention of the parentage of the concerned respondents. Considering the submissions and the grounds stated in this M.J.C., prayer for restoration is allowed and the connected Second Appeal No. 54 of 2002 is restored to its original file. The requirement of providing the parentage of the respondent nos. 2 & 3 be ignored for the present. The MJC application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)