TA No.320 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.320 of 2011 Date of decision : 02.08.2011 Sukhraj Kaur ...Applicant Versus Tarminder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Momi, Advocate, for the respondent. JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant- wife, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for the transfer of the petition titled as ‘Tarminder Singh Vs. Sukhraj Kaur’, filed by the respondent under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (for short `the Act') from the Court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Patiala, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Kurukshetra. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent has filed reply in the Court, which is taken on record. 3. It has been averred in the reply that the applicant has not come to the Court with clean hands and has concealed the material facts pertaining to the controversy involved herein. It is contended that TA No.320 of 2011 2 the applicant is a resident of Delhi, as is evident from the copy of driving licence, Annexure R-4. She has also filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., before the Family Court, Principal Bench, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, alleging herself to be the resident of territory of Delhi. 4. Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and the conduct of the applicant, I find no merit in the present application and the same is hereby dismissed. 02.08.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE Note : Whether to be referred to Reporter ? Yes / No