FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6243 OF 2007 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr.Arjun Jain, for the petitioner. Mr Pradeep Gole, for respondent nos 3 and 4. Mr S.K.chinchlikar, AGP for respondent no.1 CORAM: D.B.Bhosale,J. DATED: 25.02.2008 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr.Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has instructions not to press this writ petition since the petitioner desires to challenge the recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 in revision. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. It is open for the petitioner to challenge the recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Act in revision and if such a revision is filed same may be considered and dealt with in accordance with law. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that when the earlier revision application was filed the petitioner had deposited fifty percent of the amount as contemplated by section 154 (2A) of the Act and, therefore, he may be permitted to apply to the revisional authority while filing fresh revision application in pursuance of this order seeking exemption from depositing the fifty percent amount again. If such an application is made same may be considered on merits in accordance with law. While making this observation, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on the question whether or not the petitioner is entitled to seek such exemption. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)