IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7197 of 2010 MANAGER YADAV, S/o Satyadeo Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 461, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail by order dated 08.01.2010 with the condition that he was to file an affidavit that he is not accused in any other case. Unfortunately, the petitioner is accused in one other case which fact has been brought in paragraph 8 wherein it has been stated that he is accused in a case which is a counter-blast of a case filed by the father of the petitioner. Under the circumstances, In my opinion, the merits of the case does not interfere on account of pendency of the earlier cases. In the result, the present petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Sri Om Prakash, Judicial Magistrate, Ara (or his successor) in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 199 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)