Kambli 1 App(L)40.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ... APPEAL (L)NO.40 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.170 OF 2010 IN ADMIRALTY SUIT (L) NO.3359 OF 2010 ... M.V.Le Tong ...Appellants v/s. Cethar Vessels Ltd. & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.Rohan Cama i/b Mrs.Beena Pillai for the Appellants. Mr.Rahul Narichania i/b Brus Chambers for the Respondents. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & K.K.TATED, JJ DATED: 27th January,2011 P.C.: The order which is impugned in the Appeal is that the court though permitted the Defendant to furnish a guarantee of a non-nationalised bank has directed the Defendant to substitute that guarantee by giving a guarantee of a nationalised bank. The guarantee of a nationalised bank has to be given to protect the interest of the Plaintiff and if in the opinion of the Court the only guarantee given of the Kambli 2 App(L)40.11 nationalised bank is safe, in our opinion, the learned Single Judge is justified in doing that. In any case, the order only of substituting the bank guarantee of a non-nationalised bank by nationalised bank is not a judgment within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Appeal is, therefore, not maintainable. It is rejected. Time to substitute bank guarantee is extended for a period of two weeks from today. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)