M 07 HtGHCOURTOF JUDICATURE CHHATTISOARH : BiLASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK.CJ. APPLICANT RESPONDENTS: •t'' <^;:~ I.C.C. No. 708 OF 2006 Dinesh Kumar Chouksey, Sto Shri Ramdayal Ghouksey, aged about 46 yeare, R/o Tikrapaa, Ramdas Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil & District Biiaspur (C-G^. Versus 1. Mahesh Kurhar Agrawat, S/o Late Harehand Rai, aged about 54 years, R/o Kharsia, Presenfiy R/o Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Tehsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2. tshwarlal, S/o Late Harehand Rai, aged about 56^ y^ars,R/o Kharsia, Tehsil & Distt. Raigar^ (C.G.). 3. Smt. Shakuntala, W/o Shri Sitaram, aged about 57 years, Rfo Beiha, Tehsil Belha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. Smt. Raciha Bai, W/o Shri Narsingh Lal, aged about 55 years, Wo Sambalpur, Tehsil & District Sambalpur(0rissa). 5. Smt. Kusum Bai, W/oShri Naresh Kumar,Aged about 49 years, R/o Raigarh, Tehsil & District Raigarh (G.G.). 6. Smt. Premtata, W/o Shri Santosh Kumar, Aged about 46 years, R/o Sambalpur, Tehsil & District Sambafpur (Orissa). 7. Smt. Lata, W/o Shri Govind Ram, Aged about 43 years, R/o Kharsia, Tehsil & District Raigarh (C.G.). 8. Smt. Pana Bai, W/o Late Harehand Rai, Aged about 76 years, R/o Khareia, Tehsil & District Raigarh (C.G.). 9. Purshottam Lal, S/o Late Harohand Rai, aged about 51 years, R/o Kharsia, Tehsil & District Raigarh (C.G.). Present: Shri V.R. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. ORM.ORDER tth (Passedon9"'November, 2006) f,M -SL- In the light of the order passed by me in M.Cte. No. 495/2006 on 6th October 2006 and for the very same reasons setout by me in the above order, this M.C.C, is ordered as prayed for, however, subject to the petitioner paying cost quantified at Rs. 300/- to the Chhattisgarh High Court LegalServices Committee within a period of flfteen days from today. The costs should be paid by the concerned learried counsel without seeking reimbursement of the same from the pari:ies.