IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP Nos. 8857 & 8858 of 2011-F. Decided on: October 17, 2011. 1. CWP No. 8857 of 2011 Saroj Kumari. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 8858 of 2011 Brij Bala. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petitions are filed mainly with the following prayers: CWP No. 8857 of 2011 “(i). That a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order may kindly be issued directing respondents to allow the benefit of increments by counting the period of service rendered by the petitioner as Lecturer in English on tenure basis w.e.f. 25.7.1986 to 30.3.1994 and further the said period of service be counted for pension in view of the judgment rendered by this Hon’ble Court in CWP No. 4550/2008 decided on 16.12.2010 titled Ravi Kumar Versus State of H.P. & others.” CWP No. 8858 of 2011 “(i). That a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ order may kindly be issued directing respondents to allow the benefit of increments by counting the period of service rendered by the petitioner as Lecturer in English on tenure basis w.e.f. 18.07.1986 to 30.3.1994 and further the said period of service be counted for pension in view of the judgment rendered by this Hon’ble Court in CWP No. 4550/2008 decided on 16.12.2010 titled Ravi Kumar Versus State of H.P. & others.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar vrs. State of H.P. & another. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all 2 factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) by the petitioners before the second respondent. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 17, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol), (karan/vs) Judge.