IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2009 / 16TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18449 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED AJMAL, MINOR - REPRESENTED NEXT FRIEND (FATHER) P.B.KHALID, POOVATHINGAL HOUSE, II/604/1, ALL INDIA REDIO ROAD, P.O.RAMAVARMAPURAM, THRISSUR - 680 631. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT U.P.SCHOOL, EDAPALLY, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, ST.JOSEPH'S E.M.H.S., ERAVU, THRISSUR. R1 & R2 BY G.P. SMT. T.B. REMANI ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH FOR R3 SMT.SMITHA CHATHANARAMBATH FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SEND ON 20.6.2009 TO R1 EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DO. TO R2 EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UPON RECEIPT OF EXT.P2. // TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JDUGE T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 18449 of 2009-A - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner is a student of Plus Two Computer Science in the third respondent's school. He is aggrieved by the action taken by the school authorities in not permitting him to attend the classes from 9.6.2009 onwards. It is stated in para 4 of the writ petition that there was an incident on 4.6.2009 involving certain other students which resulted in a quarrel and it is averred that in the light of the said incident, the Principal has taken action against him also by not permitting him to attend the class. 2. Heard learned counsel for the third respondent also. It is pointed out that there are valid reasons for not allowing the petitioner to attend the class. He is also actively involved in the incident occurred in the school. It is pointed out that the incident happened on 4.6.2009. It is submitted that on 6.6.2009 also another incident occurred, wherein some persons from outside were also associated by the petitioner and another student. The said student has already obtained transfer certificate from the school. Be that as it may, it is upto the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 representation pending before him. There will be a direction to wpc 18449/2009 2 the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2 after hearing the petitioner and the third respondent, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/