IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2121 of 2011 MAHESH SINGH, SON OF INDERDEV SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being husband of the deceased seeks his bail in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 117 of 2009 registered under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as per prosecution case itself at the time of alleged occurrence, petitioner was not present in his village rather he was residing at the relevant time in foreign country. He further points out that it is only stated against the petitioner that he used to abate his other family members for torturing the deceased. He further points out that the father of the petitioner is facing trial in Sessions Trial No. 234 of 2010and in the aforesaid sessions trial, the informant was examined as prosecution witness no. 1, but he has not supported the prosecution story rather he has been declared hostile. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 117 of 2009. Anjani/ ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J. )