IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2009 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1930 RP.No. 131 of 2009(N) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28483/2007 Dated 11/04/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------------- VASU NARAYANAN, AGED 52, S/O.VASU, BLOCK NO.552, CHAKKAMALA, VATTAKARIKKAKAM PO., PACHA, PALODE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. MR.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. MR.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J -------------------------------------------------- RP No.131 of 2009 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is an applicant for grant of SSS Pension as per Annexure A judgment. This Court after considering the matter on merits directed the State Government to forward a fresh verification-cum-entitlement report showing the recommendation of the first respondent, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Central Government was directed to pass fresh orders in the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Contempt Case (C) No.609 of 2008, alleging violation of the directions issued by this Court against the Central Government. Thereafter, the claim itself was rejected by Annexure B order. Annexure B order shows that the State Government has not forwarded the verification –cum-entitlement report at that point of time. Annexure B is dated 28.11.2008. Thereafter, the State Government has forwarded Annexure (D) dated 23.12.2008 whereby positive recommendation has been made to sanction application under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme in favour of the petitioner. The same has been forwarded after withdrawing the earlier remarks forwarded as per letter dated 17.7.2008. RP: 131 of 2009 2 2. In the light of Annexure (D) fresh orders will have to be passed by the Central Government. But the time granted in Annexure A judgment is already over. Hence the petitioner seeks a modification in that regard. Therefore, in modification of the judgment, a further period of four months is granted from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, to pass a fresh order in the matter, untrammelled by the findings contained in the order (Annexure B) passed by first respondent. 3. The first respondent shall pass fresh orders after considering the recommendation forwarded by the State Government and in the light of the findings contained in Annexure A judgment. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE bps