IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 3901 OF 2010 Date: 29.04.2010 Between: S.Ashwini and another ..... Petitioners AND The State of A.P., rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 3901 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioners 1 and 2/A10 and A11 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 379, 468, 471, 472, 420 and 411 I.P.C. A10 is wife of A1, A11 is sister of A1. The case relates to theft of several motor vehicles at various places, changing the registration numbers, fabricating registration certificates and other certificates, selling them to others on such fake documents and also hypothecating the vehicles with fake documents etc. It is alleged that A10 and A11 have actively participated in executing conspiracy and that they acquired properties and jewellery in their names from earnings of stolen properties with knowledge thereof and that they also obtained multiple loans on stolen vehicles by producing fabricated documents as genuine and making others believe that vehicles are also genuine and caused wrongful loss to many finance companies and Banks. Allegations in Crime No.114 of 2009 of Automobile Team, Detective Department of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad more particularly against the petitioners/A10 and A11, are serious in nature. It is stated to be a big racket involving several persons, totaling 11 in number as on today. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that since the petitioners have taken Habeas corpus proceedings in this Court, they were falsely implicated in this case. Truth or falsity of the allegations cannot be gone into and decided in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as it is a question of fact. Investigation of offence is pending and several accused are here to be apprehended and several properties are yet to be recovered. At this stage, I do not find any valid or legal reasons to intercept the investigation. I find no merits in this petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ___________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 29th April 2010 Ivd