1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7682 OF 2009 Mohd.Hasan Samru Momin since deceased through Awaish Mohd.Hasan Momin & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.A.R.Patil for the petitioner. Mrs.Neha Bhide A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 4. Coram : D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition challenges the concurrent orders passed by the revenue authorities in R.T.S. proceedings. Admittedly, there is a civil suit pending between respondent nos.5 to 7 and the petitioners. This court is informed that respondent nos.5 to 7 have filed the suit against the petitioners for declaration and possession. In view thereof I am satisfied that this petition need not be entertained and the following order shall meet the ends of justice: The civil court shall decide the suit filed by respondent nos.5 to 7 against the petitioners on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the orders passed in these proceedings 2 by the revenue authorities. It is open to the parties including respondent nos.5 to 7 to approach the revenue authorities afresh for effecting necessary changes in the record of rights after disposal of the civil proceedings. The entries effected and which are subject matter of these proceedings shall be subject to outcome of the civil suit. It is made clear that the impugned orders are not disturbed by this order. This shall also not preclude the petitioners from instituting a civil suit if they so desire, in respect of the subject matter of these proceedings against respondent nos.5 to 7. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have examined the rights of the parties or expressed any opinion on merits of the case. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)