IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36112 of 2008 1. YADU NANDAN SINGH 2. SHEO NANDAN SINGH 3. SHANTUN SINGH 4. BABY DEVI 5. JAY SINGH 6. DINESH SINGH 7. NARESH SINGH Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SYED ZAKIR HUSSAIN ----------- 3/ 27/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 420, 467, 468 and 471 of I.P.C. On the earlier occasion the matter was adjourned to enable learned counsel to seek instructions if the petitioners were willing to refund the consideration money. Learned counsel submits that he has instructions that the petitioners were willing to deposit the consideration money in Court subject to the result of the case. The amount of consideration money in question is quantified as Rs.3,71,000/- for purposes of the bail application. If the petitioners surrender within 8 weeks along with a sum of Rs.1.5 lacs and an affidavit of undertaking to pay the balance sum out of 3.71 lacs in installments to be fixed by the court below, the court below shall proceed - 2 - to enlarge the petitioners above named on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.50,000/- (fifty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in Complaint Case No.611/05. Since this order has been passed on the offer and assurance of the petitioners to deposit the amount in question, any breach of assurance by them by failure to deposit one or any installment in time fixed by the court below shall be sufficient justification for the court below to proceed against them appropriately so that they may be taken into custody when the trial may proceed expeditiously. The amount deposited by the petitioners shall be invested in a Government interest earning security to abide by the result of the case. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )