1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.F. No. 1680/2009 in First Appeal No.1317/2008 Bhavesh s/o Bhanubhai Shrimankar Vs. Smt. Sushmita wd/o Amrutlal Kurani and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders of directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders Mr. Darasingh, Adv. for the appellant. Mr. Vyawahare, Adv. for the respondents/applicants. Coram : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. Dated : 13th July, 2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been opposed by Mr. Darasingh, learned counsel for the appellant on the ground that the same issue is pending before the Division Bench of this Court and the applicants ought to have taken steps to move appropriate application in that matter rather than in this proceeding. According to him, the applicants are not entitled to get independent water connection. In my opinion, the water connection from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, without prejudice to the rights of the parties involved in the litigation, ought to be granted in favour of the applicants/respondents since it is necessary to have supply of water in the circumstances made in the application. Hence, Civil Application is partly allowed. The 2 respondents are entitled to get new independent water connection without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar