IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 3986 of 2009 Between: G. Vijay Gnaneshwar Naidu ..... PETITIONER AND Dr. M. Ram Mohan .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following : HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:3986 OF 2009 ORDER: Aggrieved by order, dated 20.8.2009 in E.P.No.38 of 2008 in R.C.No.542 of 2006 passed by the learned Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad, the present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-tenant. The revision petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord before the Court below. Originally, the respondent-landlord filed R.C.No.542 of 2006 before the Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad for eviction of the petitioner-tenant on the ground of willful default in payment of rents, requirement of the premises for bonafide use and sublease of the premises to others. The Court below allowed the R.C. and directed eviction of the petitioner-tenant. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner- tenant filed R.A.No.182 of 2008 in the Court of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad and the said appeal was dismissed on 16.3.2009. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner-tenant preferred revision in CRP No.2209 of 2009 and this Court dismissed the said revision granting time till the end of September, 2009 to vacate the premises on condition that within four weeks from that day, the petitioner-tenant clears the arrears of rent, and files written undertaking before the trial Court to the effect that he would put the respondent-landlord in possession of the premises on or before 30.9.2009. It was made clear that in default of compliance with any of the conditions, it shall be open to the respondent-landlord to seek execution of the order of eviction. Thereafter, the respondent-landlord filed the above E.P. seeking to order eviction warrant against the petitioner-tenant on the ground that the tenant did not comply with the orders of this Court in CRP No.2209 of 2009. The Court below having observed that petitioner-tenant has not complied with the orders in CRP No.2209 of 2009, passed the order under revision to issue warrant of delivery against the petitioner- tenant. Hence, the petitioner-tenant filed the present CRP. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. On noticing the fact that that the petitioner is a practicing advocate and he filed an affidavit before the Court below undertaking that he shall vacate the petition schedule premises by the end of September, 2009, this Court on 8.10.2009 orally directed the petitioner-tenant, who was physically present along with his counsel, to hand over possession of the suit schedule property to the respondent-landlord. Today, the respondent-landlord filed a memo along with photographs, stating that he went to the schedule property at about 5.30 p.m., and found the premises locked and when the same was informed to the Counsel for the petitioner-tenant, he came to the schedule premises and they waited till 8.30 p.m., near the schedule premises, but the petitioner-tenant did not turn up to hand over the schedule premises as directed by this Court. The learned Counsel for the petitioner-tenant also submitted that he has personally gone to the schedule premises and found that the premises were locked, and they waited till 8.30 p.m., but the petitioner-tenant did not turn up. In view of the above submission and in view of the fact that the petitioner-tenant failed to comply with the orders of this Court in CRP No.2209 of 2009 as well as the oral directions of this Court, I feel that there are no bonafides on the part of the petitioner-tenant and hence, no relief can be granted in this revision and the revision is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the respondent-landlord is at liberty to avail the remedies that are open to him under law. _________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 9th October, 2009 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:3986 OF 2009 9.10.2009