FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3775 OF 2011 SYED BILAL SYED TAJODDIN AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH ... Advocate for Applicant/s : Mrs.Ansari A.n. APP for Respondent(s): Mr.B.V.Wagh. ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: September 15, 2011 ... 1. Perused investigation papers, which were made available for the inspection purpose, as well as heard learned respective counsel for the parties, finally. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicants seeking anticipatory bail, apprehending their arrest under Crime No. 29/2011, registered at Himayatnagar Police Station, Tq. Himayatnagar, District Nanded for the offences punishable under sections 307, 395, 452, 427, 323, 506, 147, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code. 3. It appears that offence has been registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by the complainant namely Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Hamja on 30.5.2011. On perusal of the contents of the First Information Report, it is apparent that names of the applicants herein have been reflected therein and specific roles FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders have been attributed to them, during the occurrence of the incident that they assaulted injured persons namely Abdul Karim by stick, who sustained serious injuries. The injury certificate of Abdul Karim discloses that, he sustained injuries by hard and blunt object, two to four hours prior to his examination, on 30.5.2011 and situs of the said injuries are index finger and back. 4. Hence, it is apparently clear that there is no possibility of false implication of the applicants in the alleged crime. Hence, considering the accusations made against the applicants, and nature and gravity thereof, custodial interrogation of the applicants is inevitable and imperative for the further progress in the investigation, in proper manner and, hence present application deserves to be rejected. 5. In the result, present application lacks merit and therefore, stands dismissed and disposed of finally. 6. The above observations are primafacie in nature, same may not be used in any other matter, being decided on merits. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) aaa/- ***