IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPSS No. 495 of 2004 Narayan Singh Rautela & others. …………….Petitioners Versus Managing Director, Almora Magnesite Ltd. and others. ………..Respondents. Mr. U.S. Bhakuni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 & 3. None appears for the respondent no. 1. 8th August, 2008 Hon’ble P.C.Verma, J. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to provide employment to the dependants of the petitioners in accordance with law. 2. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that if the posts are vacant, the respondents may be directed to consider the dependants of the petitioner for employment. 3. Prayer is innocuous. 4. Therefore, the respondents are directed to consider for employment of any member of the family of the petitioner in terms of the relevant Government Order issued in the year, 1985, in case posts are lying vacant in the department. 5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed of. (P.C. Verma, J.) 8.8.2008 Rathour