IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3573 of 2006 BIHAR RAJYA ARYA PRATINIDHI SABHA, through its Sabha Pradhan Sri Bhup Narayan Shastri, son of late Sumer Chand Shastri, R/O Hajipur, P S – Town Hajipur, District – Vaishali, Sri Munishwara Nand Bhawan, Naya tola, Patna-4. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Commissioner cum Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Adult Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary, Secondary and Adult Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna. 5. The District Education Officer, Patna. 6. The Sub Divisional Education Officer, Patna. ----------- 02. 29.10.2010 The Court fails to understand why petitioner should be shown indulgence against the notice contained in annexure-1, which has been issued by the Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, for appearance of the parties with supporting material to adjudicate the issue raised . Obviously the facts do require verification as there are two warring parties and both need to be heard before a final decision can be rendered by the authorities in this regard. Counsel for the State seems to be correct in submitting that the writ has been filed to pre-empt a decision and is premature, if not misdirected. If the petitioner has not appeared before the competent authority pursuant to annexure-1, let him do so even now and required decision will be taken thereafter after hearing the parties. The writ application stands disposed of with the above liberty. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)