1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1573 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.NO.4117 OF 2007 Kaushalya w/o Changdeo Jadhav, R/o- Terkheda, Tq-Kallam, Dist-Osmanabad. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS 1) Mahadeo s/o Tatya Jagadale died. 2) Shri Khandu Tatya Jagdale, R/o-Terkheda, Tq-Kallam, Dist-Osmanabad. 3) Fakira Sayyed Jagadale, died, 4) Shri Sadhu @ Baba Changdeo Jadhav, R/o-As above. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Mr.M.D. Shinde Advocate for Applicant. ... CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 26TH JUNE, 2009. 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. Present Civil Application preferred by original plaintiff No.1 for setting aside the Registrar's order dated 6th February, 2008, by which the Second Appeal came to be dismissed for non removal of office objections. There is delay of 255 days in preferring present Civil Application. 2. Learned counsel for the Applicant sates that the Applicant was not co-operating to the Advocate for removing office objections and therefore, it remained on the part of the Advocate to remove office objections. This cannot be a reason for condoning 255 days delay. In para 2 of the Civil Application, the statement made by the Applicant that: " That the applicant submit that applicant has complied all objections." 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant states that all office objections are not removed till 3 today. Therefore, this is a false statement made by the Applicant on solemn affirmation. In my view, the Applicant failed to disclose any satisfactory reason for condoning 255 days delay in preferring the present Civil Application. Not only that, the Applicant made false statement in Para 2 of the Application about removing office objections. Considering these facts, present Civil Application is dismissed. (K.K. TATED, J.) asb/JUN09/ca1573.09