1 WP2282.11 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2282 OF 2011 Muzambil Khan Mohammad Isaq & ors. ... Petitioners v/s The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents Mr.Amol P. Mhatre for the petitioners. Ms.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 6. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C.: 1. As per Rule 15 of the Maharashtra Kerosene Dealers’ Licensing Order 1966, a person aggrieved by the licensing authority or any other competent authority, has the remedy of challenging such an order before the State Government. When such a remedy has been permitted under the order itself, there is no efficacy in entertaining this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Hence, the petition is disposed off as withdrawn with 2 WP2282.11 liberty to challenge the order before State Government or any other competent authority. 3. If such an application is filed within two weeks from today, we direct that the same be heard and decided on its own merit but as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from its receipt. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.) 3 WP2282.11