1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.: 13335 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.: 6315 OF 2007 *** 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. Deshmukh, holding for Mr. S.B.Talekar who appears for the Applicant as well as Mr. Golegaonkar for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. This is an application preferred by the Applicant for condonation of delay of 22 days caused in filing the application for restoration. Mr. Golegaonkar for the Respondent opposed the present application vehemently and submitted that it bears no substance and, therefore, the same be rejected. 3. After considering submissions of learned counsel and for the reasons stated in the application, and more particularly in para No.3 and 4 thereof, the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. It also appears that the delay is not willful and, therefore, the same deserves to be condoned 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) thereof and delay of 22 days caused in filing application stands condoned and the application is disposed of accordingly. The application for restoration be numbered and registered. [SHRIHARI P.DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:01/10/2010. ans/13335