IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20167 of 2008 MEERA KUMARI GUPTA WIFE OF SRI CHANDAN KUMAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHNAR, WARD NO. 3, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ARUN KUMAR SON OF KADAR NATH SINGH 3. ANANTLAL RAI SON OF LATE SODHAN RAI 4. SITA RAM RAI SON OF BALESHWAR RAI, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SULTANPUR, P.S. MAHNAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner has assailed the order dated 15th March, 2008 passed by the Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Criminal Revision No. 173 of 2007 whereby the revision application was dismissed and the order dated 28th July, 2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in Complaint Case No. 1536 of 2006 (Trial No. 100 of 2007) whereby the complaint of the petitioner was dismissed has been affirmed by the impugned order. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the matter in issue with regard to execution of the sale deed without payment of any consideration money and that too the executant was intoxicated. Learned counsel further submits that for setting aside of the sale deed in question a civil suit has been filed which is pending. Considering the submissions of the parties and on perusal of the impugned order, it would appear that the basic issue is with regard to the validity of the sale deed which is subject matter of civil suit, and as such, I do not find any substance in the submission of the petitioner that disposal of the complaint was unjustified. In view of the discussions as made above, I do not find any merit in this application and the same accordingly stands dismissed. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)