HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2755 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner, who is the appellant, filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order in I.A.No. 1266 of 2009 in A.S.No.22 of 2009, dated 03.06.2010. It is submitted that even though the Advocate Commissioner was appointed, he has not executed the warrant and returned the same and the learned Judge closed the application inspite of appointment of Advocate Commissioner earlier. Hence the revision. Having heard the counsel for the petitioner, it is seen that the applications of this nature should normally be taken along with the main appeal. Only after the appeal is heard on merits, the Courts would be in a better position to know the necessity of such an exercise. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and I.A.No. 1266 of 2009 in A.S.No.22 of 2009, dated 03.06.2010 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the lower appellate Court to take up the above I.A. and dispose of the same along with A.S.No.22 of 2009. B.PRAKASH RAO,J Date:16.07.2010 Usd