Ladda 1 wp-935-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 935 OF 2011. Vikas Ambaji Mane .. .. Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents. Mr Amol Patankar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr J.P. Yagnik, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1-State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- 16th August, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called out. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Later on, Mr Amol Patankar, Advocate for the petitioner, mentioned the matter requesting to recall the order dismissing the petition for non-prosecution on the ground that when the matter was called out, he was busy in some other court. 3. For the reason mentioned, order dismissing the petition for non-prosecution is recalled. Petition is restored to file to its Ladda 2 wp-935-11.doc original number. 4. As was pointed out to us earlier by the learned A.P.P. the investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed by the Investigating Officer before the appropriate Court. The grievance of the petitioner, however, is that some of the accused persons have not been named in the charge-sheet before the concerned Court. It is not possible for us to examine that grievance at this stage. The petitioner would be free to pursue his remedy before the appropriate Court and assist that Court in the pending proceeding, if so advised. We have no manner of doubt that the concerned court would consider all aspects of the matter and in particular the issues to be raised by the petitioner that the culprits have been intentionally left out by the Investigating Officer. All questions in that behalf will have to be considered on its own merit in accordance with law. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (P.D.KODE, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)