IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.11651-M of 2010 Date of Decision:26.7.2010 Sakir and others .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Yashwinder Paul Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) In view of the detailed orders passed on 23.4.2010 and 7.5.2010 and also taking into account the statement made by girl-Sarjeena, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition. However, this Court strongly depreciates the conduct of the petitioners in filing the present petition based on false averments. However, taking into account the dispute involved and the sensitive nature of the issue, no further order is being passed in this case. Dismissed as withdrawn. 26.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE