THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26439 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner complains that respondent Nos.2 to 4 have established a Branch of their Bank in premises bearing No.3-6-271, Sudhir Tapani Towers, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. The petitioner got issued a legal notice, dated 17.09.2009, objecting the establishment of the Branch. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4, in turn, got issued a reply, dated 15.10.2009. In that, reference was made to the pending disputes between their lessors on the one hand and the petitioner on the other. This writ petition is filed challenging the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in opening the Branch in the premises referred to above. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even if the allegations contained in the affidavit, filed in support of the writ petition, are taken on their face value, it presents a case for recovery of possession. For that purpose, the petitioner has to approach a civil Court. This Court cannot resolve such civil disputes in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies in a civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:04.12.2009 kdl