IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 313 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3809 OF 1990 SHRI SANT ROHIDAS MAGASVARGIYA SAHAKARI GRIHA NIRMAN SANSTHA ..PETITIONERS V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS MR. V.Z. KANKARIA, ADVOCATE, FOR THE PETITIONERS. MR. D.A. PATIL AGP FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 4. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. DATE : 5TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Kankaria, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. D.A. Patil AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2. Mr. Patil, learned AGP referred to the affidavit in reply filed by Dr. Sanjay Chahande, Divisional Commissioner, Nashik and that of Mr. S. Chockalingam, Collector of Nashik and pointed out that in Writ Petition No. 3809 of 1990 the learned Single Judge of this court had passed an order dated 22nd August 1990 : 2 : granting ad interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (b) which restrained the Respondents from allotting 30 flats from survey No. 227 and 228 of Manmad Taluka subject to availability. The Divisional Commissioner denied that the order was flouted intentionally or otherwise by the Authorities. It is also admitted that Writ Petition was finally dismissed without any direction and therefore the ad-interim relief does not survive. In view of this this contempt petition has become infructuous. 3. The contempt petition stands dismissed. (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J)