ssss^— ^;.<o. •" RR.No........^..^-^-:^^-^^ presented^^ri....^^-""^^^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE mGH eOURT QF GHHATTISSARH-AI BJLASEUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONCC') N0. 4Sr^<? -/2006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/^rOF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF mDIA. PETITIONER ^M/s SK. Sarawagi and Company (Pyt) Limited, Chirpurgalli, District YijaynaFaffl AndBia Etadssh, fhroygh K..V. Raghav Raju, aged ^, abouf 64 years, son of Shri K.C.V. ',^^>^^ BaJu, Eieneiial ]MaHagei and BoBter e: ^^^^ Attomey rcsid.eirt ~ of SonN-Sea Jd^^^^ AEartmeHt,jFlatNo.B-304,EastPQmt %^^^ eQiany,VisaHiapatnam=i7(A.E^ ^e^-y' '^^' VERSUS ^®* RESPONDENTS ,1. State of Chliattisgarh, through - the Secretary, DegartmenFof Mmes and Minemls, Qau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) )'"*' ^, Union of India, tb-ough - Secretary ^ > 1 ^ ^p^lmstt¥ of Mmes; GQYerament of ^' BVia, Shastri ghaman, NeK Bellli. -iw 3 The Competent Aythority / Revisional Authonty, Ministry of Mines, SaKemment ef India, Shastri Bllaatan New Dehli ?- ? 1 A M/s. Pushap Steel and Mining e^);{'l^J Umited 751 Grc^ ^^ £und£wala Steeet A^meri Sst, Itfew ;,^-'s'.^ DehU. ,/5 M/s. Smghal Eriterpi-ises c/o. Colleetor, District Kankei- (C.G.)' , 6 The Collector, District Kanker (C.G.) The Petitioner, named above, respectfully submits as under:- XI-HC-22 sn^r^r R-ii+sn^r aifiti dfer .f' /"' padma *<i>ini s*>ii«») 'sss ^Wvi^, yi5\w'\s, ^<-\wy. _^:."^.s?^... g^^...v.T.i............. ^ 200 Rre^ 3n^T?Bnw(if?(T 29.11.2006 Shri Prcediant Ja/oswal, 4< for the petitioner. Smt Aryu Ahiya, Oy 6A f^r ShriBhisma Kinger, counsf None for respondents No.f Un-disputedly, the dispu1|e filing WP No.5621/2006 ond tt^e 06.11.2006 with a direction to tH< dispose of the revision expedit|< action, this writ petition has bee^i not so for been able to dispose o1 Altt)ou9h leorned counsel India without deciding the revisi of that, in my opinion, once the same cause of action no furthei peti+ion is not maintainable. In view of the above, t(i petitioner if odvised, mcy 9< 06.11.2006. enior Advocate with Shri Ali Asgor,counsel *l<<icl<fl-l Kltlfft'iftoft <Fa«i<, itSI^ITOT^T ir respondents No.l & 6/State. for respondent No.ZAJnion of India. to5. e was earlier raised by the petitioner by same was disposed of vide order dated e revisional authority - respondent No.3 to jously. Now, (gain on the scsne cause of fited because the revisional authority has the revision. For the petitioner contended that Union of ^n again adjourned it on 15.11.2006, inspite |writ petition has been disposed of, on the writ petition lies; therefore, the instant (ie writ petition is dismissed. However, ft modification of earlier order dated Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ift^^w)