IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.874 of 2010 1. MARUT NANDAN PRASAD S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O KARMA ROAD, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD, RETIRED ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT, PHYSICAL EDUCATION CUM N.D.S.I SUPUAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. VIVEK SINGH, THE SECRETARY ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 3. JAI KISHOR PD. SINGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PHYSICAL EDUCATION KOSI DIVISION SAHARSA 4. SANJAY BISHWAS DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SAHARSA 5. D.S. DHARIWAL, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA 6. NAME OF KNOWN Mr. PRAMOD KUMAR, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL U.P ALLAHABAD ----------- 4 27.04.2011 From the show cause filed by the opposite parties, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner has been substantially redressed. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest amount, which was not paid in 2001 and has been paid in 2010, has also to carry on interest. The contempt jurisdiction is not an appropriate proceeding to decide the issue. Petitioner will be at liberty to file an appropriate application in accordance with law for any such declaration, if so advised. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has some grievance against the Accountant General, U.P. also. Petitioner will be at liberty to take steps for redressal of his grievance against him in accordance with law. The contempt application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)