V613us D.K.S. Bhawan’, Raipur (C.G.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'IVI‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Peiition 1S! No. 4738 of 2008 Petitioner Jagdish Pmsad Manikpuri, S10 Adli aged about 61 yeam, Retired Chowkidar at dcparunent of water resoumc Sub (iivision Shirsh Kinkari Baramkala, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.), R/o Girhulpali, RO. Goer ‘Singha RS‘ Bammkela Distt, Raigarh (C.G.) Respondents 1, State of Chhath‘sgarh, Thmugh the Secretaxy, water resource Department, Sub Divisional O$cer, Department of water msoume Shirsh Kinkan' Barmkela, Distt. Rajgarh(c.G.) ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (s13; Hon’ble Shn‘ swish K. Agnihom‘ J.) Shxi Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate for the petin‘oner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 28th Day ofAugust, 2008) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appealing for the parn‘es the matter is heani Iinally. _ 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petiu‘oner, on instructions, submits that the peh‘h'oner does not want to press this penn‘on on merits, at this stage. However, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to me a representation to the concerned authority to consider his case in the light of the decision of this Court dated 4th January, 2007, passed in Writ Petition No. 108 of 2005 (Govind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters and the concerned authority may be directed to consider and decide the repreSentation, w in k1 w au4" accordance with law, on its own merits, within the preacn‘bed time. Leamed counsel appearing for the mspondents/ State submits that the replesentation, if any, shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in acooxdanee with Jaw, on its own men‘ts, mthm a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the xepxesentation. In View ofthe above, the petiu'on stands disposed of. ‘ Sd/-. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge