IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14827 of 2010 BHUNESHWAR CHAUHAN S/O LATE HIRAWAN NONIA, R/O VILLAGE- SAHAJPURA, P.S. TOWN NAWADA, DISTRICT-NAWADA. ………………..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. THE COLLECTOR, NAWADA, 3. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, NAWADA, 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, NAWADA, 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NAWADA, 6. SMT. KAMALA DEVI, W/O RAM PAYARE CHAUHAN, R/O VILLAGE- SAHAJPURA, P.S. TOWN NAWADA, DISTRICT-NAWADA. ……………Respondents ----------- 06 10.01.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 27.04.2010, passed by respondent no. 3 in Mutation Revision Case No. 82 (R) of 2009 and 38 (R) of 2009 (Kamala Devi Vrs. Bhuneshwar Chauhan).By the said order, the respondent no.3 has dismissed the Revision Application, which was filed against order dated 09.10.2009 passed in Appeal No. 09 of 2009-2010. It appears, the present Application arises out of a mutation proceeding. It is settled law that mutation does not create and/or extinguishes title. If the order impugned 2 is prejudicial to the petitioner, he may approach the Court of competent civil jurisdiction for ventilation of his grievance. In case, the petitioner approaches the civil Court for appropriate remedy, the findings recorded in the present mutation proceeding shall not prejudice his case in any manner. The application is disposed off. Safik ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)