IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 5645 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 23.12.2010 Hukam Singh and another ......petitioners vs. Hari Singh and another ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by learned trial Court on 18.7.2008 whereby the objections filed by the petitioners were dismissed. It has been found that the petitioners have purchased the property vide a sale deed dated 9.2.2005, i.e., after the decree was granted by learned trial Court on 26.2.2002. Therefore, the petitioners are the transferee pendente lite and such sale will not entitle the petitioners to object to the decree granted in favour of the decree holder. Reasoning given by learned trial Court cannot be said to be suffering from patent illegality or material irregularity. It may be stated that the order impugned is of 18.7.2008 whereas such order is challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India after more than 2 years and 4 months i.e., after gross delay. In view of the said fact, no ground is made out to interfere with the order passed by learned trial Court on 18.7.2008. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 23.12.2010 preeti