1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION(LOFG) NO. 1876 OF 2009 L And T Finance Ltd. ..... Petitioner V/s Huma Constructions & Anr. .....Respondents. ----- Ms. Disha Karambar, for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 10 th FEBRUARY 2010 . P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the Respondents through served. Affidavit of service dated 28.1.2010 to that effect is filed. 2. By an order dated 7.1.2010, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) has been granted. Since none appears on behalf of the Respondents, the averments made in the Petition remain uncontroverted. The Petitioner is a finance company. Respondent No. 1 had availed loan facility and purchased the vehicle. Respondent No. 2 2 is a guarantor. The Petitioner had advanced loan to Respondent No.1 for purchase of a vehicle and executed the Loan-cum- Hypothecation Agreement. Under the said agreement both parties had agreed that in the event if any dispute arises, Sole Arbitrator will be appointed. The Petitioner filed the present Petition under Section-9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petitioner seeks further interim relief to secure the loan amount advanced by the Petitioner to Respondent No.1. 3. Perused the Petition. In my view, prima facie case is made out by the Petitioner, in the result the Petitioner is entitled for grant of interim relief. Accordingly, prayer clause (a) of the Petition is granted. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) which was granted by an Order dated 7.1.2010 is confirmed. 4. The Petition is disposed of. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to apply for further relief, if required. (V.M. KANADE, J.)