IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36135 of 2009 Rajendra Yadav, son of Dhanpat Yadav, village Bara, PS M.U. Bodh Gaya, Dist. Gaya – petitioner. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Ainul Haque Khan, son of Late Manawar Ali Khan, village Bara, PS M.U. Bodh Gaya, Dist. Gaya – Opp. parties. 2 16.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been field for quashing the order, dated 22.2.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 1454/2005 by which cognizance for the offences under sections 386, 383/34 of the Penal Code and section 27, Arms Act was taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the persons who have been made accused in the present case have either filed cases or are witnesses against opposite party no.2 . The submission is that the case has been filed in order to wreak vengeance against the petitioners and others who are, in one way or the other, involved in the earlier cases. The submissions made on behalf of the petitioner are the good grounds which may be taken on behalf of the petitioners at a later stage in this case. For the reasons aforesaid, this court see no reason to interfere with the order taking cognizance, dated 22.2.2007. This application is dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)