IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 35 OF 2009 M/S. NANU ENGINEERS PVT LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR PRAVAS NAIK ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 20th January, 2009 P.C. By this petition, the petitioner prays that since the work is already completed and the final bill also finalised, the respondents should release the Bank Guarantee which has been given in lieu of security deposit. Today, at the time of arguments, the learned Advocate General submitted that appropriate steps would be taken in connection with the release of the Bank Guarantee in favour of the petitioner, within a period of one week from today and, in that view of the matter, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to withdraw this petition. Permission is granted. Disposed off as withdrawn. In view of the statement of the learned Advocate General, there is no question of encashing the Bank Guarantee on the part of the respondents. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.