IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 21130 of 1995 Between: 1 Shaik Zakir Hussain S/o Dada Mastan H.No.2/68, Krutivennu Village, Krutivennu (M) Krishna Dist 2 Kanumalli Ramachandra Rao S/o Pullaiah H.No.2/47, Krutivennu (V) Krutivennu (M) Krishna Dist. 3 Adhikari Swamy Naidu S/o Subba Rao H.No.2/55, Krutivennu (v) Krutivennu (M) Krishna Dist 4 Sannidhi Bhaskar Rao S/o Musalaiah H.No.2/56 Krutivennu (V) Krutivennu (M) Krishna Dist 5 Chekuri Nageshwar Rao S/o Narayana H.No.1/88 Krutivennu Vill., Krutivennu Mdl., Krishna Dist. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Megistrate and Collector (Panchayat Wing) Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist. 2 The Gram Panchayat rep. by its Executive Officer, Kruthivennu, Krishna Dist 3 Shri Manukonda Gangajalam Krutiveenu Gram Panchayat, Krutivennu, Krishna Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the resolution No.54 dated 10-7-1995 passed by the Committee of Gram Panchyat, Krutivennu Represented by the 3rd respondent in seeking to construct drainage pipe line from the house of Shir Nekkanti Krishna Murthy to the house of Shri Kethined Venkata Subbarao and to connect the same to the defunct drainage channel on the M.D.O.'s Office street as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief. “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit the petitioners herein pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Resolution No.54 dated 10-7-1995 passed by the Committee of Gram Panchayat, Krutivennu represented by the 3rd respondent in seeking to construct a drainage pipe line from the house of Shri Nekkanti Krishna Murthy to the house of Shri Kethinedi Venkata Subbarao and to connect the same to the defunct drainage channel on the M.D.O’s Office Street as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction, and set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his clients want to withdraw the writ petition and addressed a letter to that effect. Learned counsel for the petitioners furnished a copy of the said letter addressed by the petitioners to the second respondent herein expressing their consent to withdraw the writ petition. A copy of the same is furnished to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is placed on record and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J Dated: 2-11-2004 LSK/TVK To 1 The District Megistrate and Collector (Panchayat Wing) Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna Dist. 2 The Executive Officer, Gram Panchayat, Krishna District. 3 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 4 Two C.D. copies.