1 ¥• jr^g.ia.a^ Dr. Anjani Kumar Pandey S/o Shri R.B. Pandey, Aged about 46 years, R/o BaQsunthpur, Talisil- iaikuathpur, Distiict - Korca (C.G.) State of Chbattisgai'h, fhroiigh Secietary, Departoient of Agriculture (Animal Husbandry) Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur {C.G.) Drrector, Veteriaary Serrices, Raipur (C.G.) Jomt Director, Veterina.'ry Services Coiaposite Building, ia front of CoUectorate, Bilaspur (C. G.) Dr. Virendra Pfflai S/o Not kno%7n Vetermaiy Assistaat Surgeon, Animai Disease Investigatioa Lab. Bilaspi.ir (C.G.) [Presently Iiolding charge of Manager, Govemment Poultp/ Farm., Dr. R.K.S. Pai-mar S/o Not Veteruiary Assistant Surgeon, Govemiaent Poultry Farm, Baikuntlipur, Talisfl - Baikuntlipui', Distiict- Korea i'C.G.l Shri Mahendra Dubey, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singli, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondeuts No. 1 to 3 on advaace copy. Shri Manm.dra Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate wifh ShriAfroj Kiian, counsel for respondent No.4 on Caveat Petition No. 665/2007 Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner argues ftiat fhe petitioner, who was workmg as Vetermar^' Assistaut Surgeon m. Kukui. Palan Prakshetra, Bailcunthpur, has been transferred to Kukut PaJan Prakshetra, Bilaspiu- on adaurdstrative grounds by E ^ -fc- 2 W.P.(S) No. 4333/2007 order dated 29.6.2007 (Annexure-P/1). He subraits fhat thereafter, aiiofher order dated 2nd Jiily, 2007 has been issued by the Govemment, ia relation to respondent No.4, accordiiig to which, the respondent No.4 tias also been posted as fhe Mauager ia Kiikut Palan Prakshetra, Bilaspur. He furttier subinits fhat another person namely B.P. Soni is also workuii on a similar post. His subraissioa is that fhere are only two posts, which are being occupied by two persons but by order Annexure-P/4, the respondent No.4 has been sent to that place, as aa effect ofwbich, the concenied office is not tafcmg joiniag of fhis petitioner for waiit of post. He subniits fhat iil fhis regard, the petitioner has filed a detailed repi^sentatioa vide Annexiu-e P/5 on 13.7.2007 but no decisiou has been taken ia this regard. The subinission is fhat if fhe early decision is not taken, the services of fhe petitioner aiay be affected aad a situation laay arise when he raay not be getting salary for want of joiniiig at aiiy place. He fartlier subiaits fhat for fhe tiiae being fhis petition be disposed of witli a direction to fhe concemed aufhority to dispose of the representation filed by fhe petitioner wifhia tlie stipulated period granted by tliis Court. The prayer appears to be reasonable aiid fiie saine is It is directed fhat the petitioner, shall file a fresh representation wifhia a period of 10 days from today before the concemed Secretaiy with copy of this order and a copy of writ petition filed before this Court and tf such a representation is filed, that shall be disposed of wifhin a period of 15 days froia the date of filing of fhe representation and fhe petitioner sliaU be coiniaunicated fhe consequence fhereof. With fhe aforesaid directions, fhe petition staads finally clisposed of. ,———~~ — Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti