1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.167 OF 2006 CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.167 OF 2006 CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.167 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.8 OF 2006 1. Jitendra Shamprasad Jaiswal ] @ Babloo ] Applicant No.1 2. Taslim Alim Khan ] Applicant No.2 versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] Respondents. Mr.Shahid Azmi for the applicants. Mr.I.S.Thakur, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ. DATED : MARCH 23, 2006. DATED : MARCH 23, 2006. DATED : MARCH 23, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard advocate for the applicants, who are original accused Nos. 3 & 4 and, the learned 2 2 2 APP for the State. The accused are convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced for life imprisonment along with others. However, so far as these applicants, original accused Nos. 3 and 4 are concerned, the only evidence against them is, recovery of weapons viz. chopper and knife. Those were not sent to the chemical analyser. No witness attributes any role to them. No evidence of identification is there. These facts are conceded by the learned APP. In these circumstances, they are entitled for bail. Therefore, these applicants - original accused Nos. 3 and 4 be released on their P.R. bonds of Rs.7,500/- each with one solvent surety each in the like amount. They will attend the concerned police station once in a month in the first week till the appeal is disposed of. The application is disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J] [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]