1 W.P.No.6063 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 6063 OF 2008 Dattatraya s/o Purushottam Deshmukh and anr. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr V.D.Salunke, Advocate holding for Mr R.M. Gaikwad for the petitioners; Mr D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondents no.1, 2, 5 & 7; Ms Geeta Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no.5; Mr M.L. Dharashive, Advocate for respondent no.6 CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 5th April, 2011 PER COURT : The petitioners have sought a direction against the respondents for payment of compensation towards land ad measuring 79 Ares, which thee petitioners claim belongs to them. The petitioners have also sought rental compensation. 2. It appears from the record that the petitioners had objected to the acquisition of the land by a representation made on 5.9.2006 under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. However, it appears that 2 W.P.No.6063 of 2008 respondents no.2 & 5 have paid no heed to this representation. An award has been passed on 6.10.2007. Thereafter the petitioners preferred an application under section 13 A of the Land Acquisition Act for correction of certain clerical errors. Respondent no.5 again has not cared to consider this application made on 17.4.2008. In our view, the petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioners, in accordance with law. That be done within twelve weeks from today. Petition disposed of accordingly. While deciding the representation, the petitioners as well as respondent no.6 and the acquiring body shall be heard. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) amj/wp6063.08