1 APPLN 4967 OF 2009 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4967 OF 2009 Smt. Sulabha Sudam Pawar .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. Prakash Naik,. for the Applicant. Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. V.S. Talkute for respondent Nos 2 to 5. CORAM: R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 7th March, 2011. P.C.: 1. The petitioner wife seeks cancellation of bail granted to her husband’s assailants by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Satara on the ground that learned Additional Sessions Judge was not justified in invoking ground of parity. As rightly submitted by learned counsel for the respondents the assault described in the F.I.R. as well as chargesheet shows that there was one injury caused to victim Sudam and one to Sachin. Sudam died on 14.9.2009 as a result of injury sustained on 8.9.2009. The persons who have been granted bail were also injured in the assault and case under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code has been filed by kinsmen of the victim Sudam. Considering the nature of allegations made, no 2 APPLN 4967 OF 2009 case for cancellation of bail is made out. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the respondents tried to threaten the prosecution witnesses. Such allegations could be made in order to secure cancellation of bail and therefore unless backed up by concrete material, may be ignored. Respondents shall, however, scrupulously keep themselves away from all the prosecution witnesses till the trial is over. Any attempt to approach any of the prosecution witnesses would result in cancellation of bail. Application is rejected. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)