IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4998 of 2010 KRIPA SINGH SON OF AYODHAYA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(xii) of the SC/ST Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 24.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in Karamchat P.S.case No.29 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to - 2 - do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The Magistrate concerned before releasing the petitioner on bail will notice the informant and satisfy himself that in fact there has been a compromise between the parties. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )