- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.368 OF 2006 Shri.Lakhi (Kari) Narayandas Makhija and Ors. ..Pettioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors...Respondents ... Mr.Subhash Jha i/b Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh Advocate for Petitioners Mrs.A.S.Pai A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 20, 2006 DATE : MARCH 20, 2006 DATE : MARCH 20, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Subhash Jha, learned advocate for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners want that firstly; action should be taken against the Respondent Nos.6, 7 & 8 for showing on their T.V.Channel something in the form of protest or something that was against the order of this Court regarding demolition of illegal structures. In our opinion, that issue is closed - 2 - long back. Now the Government has passed Ordinance and even this Court has given two years time to Government to implement that Ordinance. Secondly, according to the Petitioners, the Respondent Nos. 6, 7 & 8 have committed breaches of provisions of Cable, Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1994 Act and Rules framed thereunder. Learned A.P.P. states that the authorities under that Act, will be directed to take appropriate steps with reference to the breaches pointed out by the Petitioners within a period of six months from today. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]