IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 993 of 2009 (M/S) Smt. Shanti Devi ……Petitioner • • Versus State and others …….Respondents Mr. Pradeep Hairia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Advocate for respondents No. 6 and 7. • Dated:-01-09-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel of the parties and perused the record. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:- “1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2,3, 4 and 5 to not give effect of the impugned orders dated 10.03.1993, passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate and order dated 12.02.2001, passed by Assistant Record Officer respectively so far as it relates with the transfer of the public utility land in the name of the private persons. 2. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to rectify the mistake and correct the record of rights in accordance with the provisions 0f law forthwith. 3. Issue and other writ, order or direction to which this Hon’ble Court may kindly be deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. Award the cost.” According to the petitioner, the land is recorded under the category Varg-6 of the revenue record but the impugned orders dated 10.03.1993 and 12.02.2001, were passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Assistant Record Officer, respectively whereby names of respondents No. 6 and 7 was recorded and regularized in the revenue records. I have perused the prayer clause A, whereby the petitioner has sought mandamus not to give effect to orders dated 10.03.1993 and 12.02.2001,so far as they relate with the transfer of public utility land in the name of respondents No. 6 and 7. The petitioner has not assailed the complete orders. Without assailing the above impugned orders, as a whole, the relief could not be granted to the petitioner by issuing a writ of mandamus. The petitioner, if aggrieved by the above mentioned orders, may approach appropriate forum for setting aside these orders. No mandamus can be granted unless the impugned orders are assailed. With the said observation, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (B.S.Verma, J.) 01-09-2010 S