IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 14275 of 1999 Between: 1 T.S.Sampath Kumar, S/o. T.Subrahmanyam 2 M.Zakeer Hussain, S/o. Gulam Salena 3 S.Mohan 4 G.Shanmugam, S/o. Thangavelu Chetty 5 A.Purushotham 6 K.Venkatamuni, S/o. V.Venkata Subbaiah 7 K. Manohar, S/o. V.Venkata Subbaiah 8 N.Damodar Reddy 9 K.Gangadharam, S/o. K.Venkata Subba Reddy 10 K.Madhava Reddy, S/o. K.Kanna Reddy ..... PETITIONERS AND The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondent in refusing to receive the applications from the petitioners for the post of attenders as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and direct the respondent to receive the applications from the petitioners for the post of attenders and direct to allow the petitioners for interviews sponsored by the employment Exchange which is to be held on 23.7.99 or any other relevant date and consequently direct the respondent to consider their case. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.R.CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for Respondent : Mr.G.JAGADISHWAR (SC FOR TTD) The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 6.7.2005 DA/NSR To 1. The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 2. Two CD copies.