IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9572 of 2011 BHARAT RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Vaishali Nagar P.S. Case No. 114 of 2004 registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is to the effect that a truck loaded with wood was seized and was kept in the informant’s custody and from there some unknown accused persons forcibly took away the truck with wood. The petitioner is the owner of the said truck. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similar case was lodged in 2004 in which the petitioner was granted bail. Since the impugned order was passed on 10.07.2004 on that ground alone, I am not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the 2 petitioner without being prejudiced the order of this Court, considering the fact that the petitioner was granted bail in connected matter and he was not aware of filing of the present case. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)