IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7318 of 2008 Between: M/s.Clean Way Sanitation Social Service Organization a registered Society having its offce at 1-27-329, Bapuji Nagar, Bowenpally Cantonment, Secunderabad rep.by its General Secretary and Authorised Signatory Mr.K.Ajith Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner having its office at Tank Bund Road Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner and Special officer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, having its office at Tank Bund Road Hyderabad 3 The Zonal Commissioner, South Zone, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, having its office at Tank Bund Road Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to grant an order direction or writ more so in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in prescribing the conditions of payment of Rs.3000/- for application forms and Rs.360/- towards Sales Tax and payment of security deposit of Rs.20000/- for pre-qualiﬁcation in the tender notiﬁcation bearing No.464/HS04405/GHMC/2008 dated 14.3.2008 published in the news papers on 16.3.2008 issued by the respondents as illegal, arbitrary violative Article 14 and 19(1) (A) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the allotment process without insisting on payment of Rs.3360/- towards application costs and sales tax and Rs.20,000/- towards security and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.RAGHUNANDAN Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording his submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous at the admission stage. _________________________ (B. Seshasayana Reddy, J.) 15th November, 2008 Js.