IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1518 of 2008 Between: 1 U. Lavanya W/o. U. Balakrishna, R/o.Plot No. 2037 Saibaba Nagar, "C" Block, Near Dhammaiguda, Kapra, R.R. District. 2 Balakrishna S/o. U. Nageshwar Rao, R/o.Plot No. 2037 Saibaba Nagar, "C" Block, Near Dhammaiguda, Kapra, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Inspector of Police, Bommalla Rama Ram (M) Nalgonda District. 2 The Inspector of Police, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioenr of Police Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Talla Malla Reddy S/o.Late Ram Reddy R/o. 4-4 Rangapur Village, Post, Ramaliangampally Bommala RamaRam (M) Nalgonda District. 5 Sri T.narender Reddy S/o. Ram Reddy R/o. 4-4 Rangapur Village, Post, Ramaliangampally Bommala RamaRam (M) Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to order or direct the respondents more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by directing the respondents not to interfere with the matrimonial life of the petitioners whose marriage was held on 22-1-2008 at Arya Samaj, Aryanagar, Lalaguda, Secunderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR.M.VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners seek directions by way of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to interfere with their life and liberty. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated that both the petitioners are studying in the same college and both are majors. It is stated that as they are in love with each other, they got married on 22nd of January 2008 at Arya Samaj Mandir in Lalaguda, Secunderabad. It is their grievance that as they belong to different communities, the 4th respondent who is the father of the 1st petitioner and the 5th respondent who is the brother of 4th respondent, are opposing their marriage and are interfering with their marital life. It is the grievance of the petitioners that as there was threat to their lives, they have also filed a representation before the 1st respondent-Police on 24th of January 2008, seeking protection, as their lives are in danger. But inspite of the same, no protection was given to them by the Police. 3. While issuing Notice before admission, this Court, by order dated 11th of February 2008, has permitted the learned counsel for petitioners to take out notices to respondents 4 and 5 and file proof of service. Pursuant to receipt of notice, the 4th respondent is present today in person. When he was questioned, he has stated that he and his brother i.e. 5th respondent herein are not interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners. Even the learned counsel for petitioners has stated that presently, there is no interference by respondents 4 and 5. In view of the statement made by the 4th respondent, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has requested to dispose of the writ petition, keeping it open for the petitioners to approach Police in case if there is any interference by respondents 4 and 5 with their personal life and liberty, in future. 4. Asmuch as the 4th respondent has already stated that there is no interference by himself and his brother i.e. 5th respondent, placing on record the submission made by the 4th respondent who is the father of the 1st petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of, keeping it open for the petitioners to file a complaint before the Police, if there is any interference with their personal life and liberty by respondents 4 and 5. If any such complaint is filed, the Police concerned may extend the possible protection to safe guard the life and liberty of the petitioners, who are alleged to have married on 22nd of January 2008. 5. Subject to above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th February 2008 ajr To 1 The Inspector of Police, Bommalla Rama Ram (M) Nalgonda District. 2 The Inspector of Police, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioenr of Police Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Talla Malla Reddy S/o.Late Ram Reddy R/o. 4-4 Rangapur Village, Post, Ramaliangampally Bommala RamaRam (M), Nalgonda District. 5 Sri T.narender Reddy S/o. Ram Reddy R/o.4-4 Rangapur Village, Post, Ramaliangampally Bommala RamaRam (M), Nalgonda District.