IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 25635 of 1997 Between: K.Ramakrishna Rao, S/o Narasimha, R/o Vetapalem, Cherala Taluk, Prakasham District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Regional Transport Authority, Rep. by its Secretary, Prakasham District at Ongole. 2 The Secretary, Regional Transprot Authority, Prakasham District, Ongole. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting the permit on the route of "Chirala R.S. to Kataipalem" despite directions of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 12137/97, dt: 6-6-97 and further direct the 2nd Respondent to grant Temporary permit, if the application for pucca permit is not considered with in a period of two weeks. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.JOHN RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENVIRONMENT The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survives and the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Dated 09th March, 2005. Tvk To 1. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Prakasham District at Ongole. 2. 2 CCs to G.P. for Environment, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. 2 C.D. copies.