IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34796 of 2008 MILU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is only evidence in the case is the confession made by this petitioner before the police but that is not the sole evidence rather circumstantial evidence is also there and in the F.I.R. itself that is mentioned that she was asked by the informant son of the deceased about whereabout of the deceased and suspicions rather wrong information was given and during that period she remain absent while the deceased was not inside the house. Thus I find that it is not a fit case for bail even taking into consideration the petitioner’s custody, the prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI