: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5601 OF CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5601 OF CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5601 OF 2005 2005 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.71 OF 1988 FIRST APPEAL NO.71 OF 1988 FIRST APPEAL NO.71 OF 1988 Mrs. Devi Gobindram Hamrajani & Ors. ...Applicants. V/s. Mrs. Manisha Ranjit Hemrajani & Ors. ...Respondents. Shri B.Saraf, adv. h/for Chaturvedi & Associates for the Applicants. Shri Govinda C. Mohanty, adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.V.MOHTA, J. A.V.MOHTA, J. A.V.MOHTA, J. DATE : 21st December, 2005. DATE : 21st December, 2005. DATE : 21st December, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard. Considering the reasons given in the order dated 22nd September, 2005 passed in the First Appeal No.71 of 1988 and in view of the fact that at the relevant time, no such request was made to continue injunction which was granted on 1st March, 1988 by this Court. And, therefore, there is admittedly no protection order is in existence since 27th February, 2005, in such circumstances, there is no reason now to pass any order of continuation of injunction in terms of prayer clause (b) after a gap of 30 days. 2. However, so far as prayer clause (a) is concerned, it is granted and the Registrar is directed to : 2 : send paper book of City Civil Suit No.6630 of 1984 to the City Civil Court. 3. Parties are at liberty to take appropriate pleas while moving injunction application, if any. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly in terms of prayer clause (a) only. (ANOOP.V.MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP.V.MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP.V.MOHTA,J.)