L Ill HI Mill!!! HHHHIHIIW ‘y . 77> 3ALPUR&/ PETIIIQEER Erajash Kumar §andey S/o late . Sh tyanand Panasy a. pmaen‘t Manic a1 Caunc‘l Raigarh. s Pam in tw ()t‘fice of aka$§w§§§§§g 1n ‘stata Madhya Pméesh tmeugn Secmmxy bap+h of Nagar Prasmsan. alGpa; w z ‘2— UpaSanchalak; raga: Pmsmsan,silaspur. 3- Nuniupai Gauncil Raigaxh. through its K Achini$fra€eza gggggmvcmsxmgmm03 mun. k7 AAE‘ .;... ' 7. ‘ 7,; - i3wh§m~ §£§m§i {Civii)§_ A c w/L/ xamm u; ; HIGH CQURT OF CHHA’E‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR Wn't Petifim} N9. 3194 Sf 19g2 git Patitioner Brajash Kumai‘ Pandey Vtrsus Raspmxlems State of Madhya Pradesh 3a otherS SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justica Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri 11K. Pandey, Advocak for the. imfitiongr, 1, Shri GJ}. Waswani, G0vernm€nt Advaca€e for the resiaondont Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, counsel for the. respondaot No. 3, No. ORAL ORDER (27th July, 2005; 1. The respondent No. 3 issmad an adverfjsement clated . f 12.8.1992 (Anooxme Pl4) for appomtment of one. post of Time Keepar with certain conditions and tho said post is resowod for €118 Schaduloé Ti's'bos. go The petitioner was appointed as Peon and has been workiog since 13.8.1985. 3. The yetjtioner has flled this peiition playing that the. peiitioner be permitted to apply for ammintment on the. oost of Time. Keeper agaioet me reserverl post for Scheduled Tribes {Aouguehit Jailjati) 4, The respondent No. 3 tiled the retom} statiog that the reeponctent,’ Corporation is; tn processs for creation of post of Time KeeperjWork Assistant, for which the. petitioner is at iiberty to make art aepiieation for aopoiatment on the post of Time Keeoer, as em whee the same is advertised. h) £11 View 9f tha statemm}? 9f the respmldent No. 3, nothing Even othmwise, there is no tha phtitz'cumr. granttrd 1'11 favour of 1:1 tha factS survives in this matter. semblance: of any right, which can be Bablu Sdt- I I ; Satish K. Agmhotn Judge 7