-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1673 OF 2008 M/s.Landmark Properties & Developers : Petitioner V/s. Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr. : Respondents ... Mr.D.H.Mehta i/b. M/s.Jurists Uno for the petitioner. Mr.N.A. Shaikh for respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Madhav Jamdar for applicants in Ch. Summons No.258/2008. Mr.Shailesh Shah i/b. M. Munim & Co., for applicants/intervenors in Ch. Summons No.271/2008. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 09, 2008. P.C. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for the respective respondents/ intervenors waive service. Heard by consent. 2. The permission granted in favour of the petitioner has been revoked admittedly without hearing them, but on the complaint of one developer, who claims to be the owner of the property. Without going into the merits of the -: 2 :- matter, it is clear that the order is not sustainable, being in violation of the principles of natural justice. It is, therefore, set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Asstt. Commissioner, ‘S’ Ward, for a fresh decision, in accordance with law. Chamber Summons Nos.258 of 2008 and 271 of 2008 for intervention are not considered since those parties can be heard by the Asstt. Commissioner before passing an order. Accordingly, Chamber Summons Nos.258 of 2008 and 271 of 2008 stand disposed of. 3. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. S.A. BOBDE, J.