IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10615 of 2010 1. PRAKASH URAON, S/o Late Bolo Uraon. 2. Babulal Uraon, S/o Late Somar Uraon. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 13.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 342, 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 11.01.2010 mainly for the reason that he had remained absconding for eleven years but had been given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The submission is that the charge has been framed on 15.02.2010. In view of such, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-VII, Purnea in connection with S.Tr. No. 1007 of 2009 arising out of K. Nagar P.S. Case No. 253 of 1998 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close - 2 - relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)