1 Farad Continuation Sheet No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.41 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1404 OF 2007. (NOORKHAN MALIKA MIYAKHAN . Vs.VINAYKUMAR TIHILE & ANR.) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri P.N.Shende, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : APRIL 08, 2009. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to show as to how Grievance Committee is a Court subordinate to the High Court and in any case as to why the High Court should be executing order of such committee. 2. Leaving liberty to approach such Fora, as may be available by such proceedings as the petitioner may contemplate, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. JUDGE RR.