IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.21751 of 2009 LAXMAN SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /3/ 07.09.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The first information report appears to be in two parts. The first part has been doubted by the investigating authority in course of investigation. So far second part is concerned, the allegation is that when the informant was in the field the petitioner along with others arrived there and thereafter the petitioner gave a farsa blow on the head causing injury. 3. It is contended that there is a counter version lodged by the own brother of the petitioner being Mahishi P.S. Case No. 113 of 2008. The present informant is accused in the said case. Learned counsel submits that in paragraph 20 of the case diary it has come that the petitioner was in the potato field of one Pankaj Chaudhary. He has drawn attention of this Court to Annexure 2 in order to submit that a suit is pending between aforesaid Pankaj Chaudhary and the father of the petitioner relating to title of the land in question. 2 4. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner was responsible for causing injury on the head by means of farsa. It appears from the injury report that the dimension of the injury was 3” x 1/6” x 1/6”. The doctor has initially opined that the injury was simple in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2009. 5. Looking to the broad aspect of the case appearing from record, this Court is persuaded to admit the petitioner, Laxman Sah, to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mahishi (Jalal) P.S. Case No. 114 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. S.A. (Kishore K. Mandal )