'c.:.',^ IN^I-l@HIGB^OUI^£)E;CMHAlrTIS^ARH^^^ WRiTI»ETltlC5NJN(:^%£^3^ Nagesh^rRrasadiKa.tjshil^SOri.of ^La|e^htH|Sftyam|a1g^<ai.|sl"iil<,;agec|i abQuK'^.j^5::,'y/^,years,^;^,:Syspend gmpl^Yee^ssistanfeStJlaInSReetor, KrishiHUpaj Mandi Sam Janjgiiv^ Djsfrjefe i;3anjgir-£l^m ^ll^^.^^^^..',::.^:;:':)'^,.^^ Rgsidgrit ofWard No.3, Naya^Talab; Para,^^Narla,_TaRsilandDistric^ Jgnjgir-Chainpa (C.G.); './if ^y^'.'- ^ RESPQNDENTg m- ^EftS(.IS"S':^-''-.•.:•;..,'-'' ^G.C3.'rRgj^a|Ki'ishi;-yij:)naiT?,Boai'cl,.; Through: Its Managing Director, RaiRUr(C:.G.). ^, The Deputy Directpr,^ G.G Krishi ^^ViRnan ^Boai^,l Bilaspu ^District Bilaspui- (C.G.).' ^•.^,^e|^S^^i|6j^i^,^KrisW^.ypa]^ Samiti, ^ ^Naila-Janjgjr;^ l;.?lJarrjgir-Cha:mf>a.(CfG:-^:;:':^^^..::-^ :.?1!1 lfig;©I..E^-'22©/2;27'^:SQR^?x"ri-IE IgBT'ITIQN li^l.iiiMcsE^QKSaiRa mi-ION-ORiINDIg lRE®B8;E © IBfM%Nll^ tilBI^BlB»^ §UitXlLi^©IRBST NaBiR@EKtO?gKC^®^ XI-HG-22 '3ST;<<iii<'i<<,;8)al'M'iio,fti?ii'yy; ^n^r^q^ HiHwrawb 200^ i^^r' sn^r^ii Kl'fi* 311^1 ^ yfia '\-'-' CSS 0^ 3i)^r-?tgTw^if?a 11-S-200S IV!r.V.K.Panc!ey,counseSf6rl ^ Heard on admission. By ihis writ petitiQrr under Articl pstitipner.has praysd that respondsnt &rder<lated 29-42-200't anddirecithe ofthe-pefitioneiy.^:'' ; ^-::.'1:"-^ .: •:, THe ease 6f the petitidner is| Inspector? Mandi.Samiti, Nsila-JanJgi febricated criminal^ case agajnst .th^ rsgjstered in-thatcpnnectton. The peii' hours, thersfore, respondent No.2 su^ charge sheet has been-fiWinthafcca;] of tne stay granied by the Hjgfi Counj havs chailehged the .fi'amtng ef chargl has been initiated agasnst th^ petitiofl passea resplyiion datsd 28-1-20p4 n| thattheCTiminalCas& is likelylo-ta!® J !t is admitted positiffhfiiattte-pt crimina! charges; against Him and mot^ againsS ffie pstitioner. Iri ^rie^ drcunf! resppndent Nd.2 tb revoke' the respondentetoeonsiderthecaseoftht for reinstatamentorn6t,inaccordance| .ThepetitioniS^liSReSedof. ttielpetiti6r.er. «rnln<ffitlFTCff ^ teet^i^lT .^"aiPwsii^f'.' : ;|e 226/227 oftheCdnstitution of India, ;the ^|Q.2 be directed to revoks Jhe suspsnsion Irespondents to oorisider the' representatien tliat he was w?rking as Assistant Sub and 'ciuring that penod somie faise and 1 petitioner and six ether persons was Soher was k°pt; unaer judiciai custody for48 teshdsd We Detitioneron 29-12-2001 .and and the tnat.haa been stav'ed on account 'in a petition wherein theaccusey persons is agaSost Wem. No ciepartmentel snquiry ^er so^lar and even the Mandi Samiti has |ir Tsvocaiio" or cuspension on ths grouod s4mem&r&t!me. . . ititioher has beSn auspendetfon account of over, ehaige sheet tias' aiready been filed ;unt!3taoces, RD rule can be Issued directihs susR^nsiorr order of tha petitiQner. It is tor the petitioner, whether the saetitioner !s entitled wifh iaw. ! . • - '. . Sd/- fc-.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^a^