iC—78 'S'ss T<ii'4ici<i, yTil-a'Ko, fqciiyy wwtra»*n<t» •^200 311^1'tRRT (ipf^q^tT) 311^1 ^t R-f '(W ^Tt^T st>*ii4t V. SINSLE BBICH: HON'BLE JlKSTCCE &HIRBIDRA MISHM W.P. te] N1 'ETETEONERS 1. SubhasM aged 2. Smt. Br aged Both ar® Bhnwan, Hii DistrictRai) obdut abdut Vs ?ESPONbENTS 3> 1. Sukhmohon (i Vehicls Chandrgpur V.e.) 2. The Orient'al (Insurer o-fl Throigh th| Office, Chawls Comp^ 3. Shailendrs about 23ye4 4. Ku. Sesma fl The responden' Dhanchci Bhm Amcnama, Dtstr ?0,06,2008 Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advocate Mr. Ajay Mishra, Advocate for Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate for ^tP4^<iN tTFRff ^f 'fe1^ ^^K ^?3TRPI 311^1 .4020/2007 ©hai, S/o Late Chaman ©hai, 53 ysars. jbala @hm, W/o Subhosh ©hoi, 50 years. •esieients of Slice-3, Dhancha •apur, Poijce Station Amonmna, lur, C.6. lingh Bawa (Registered owner of No.M.H.29-H-8093) through Roadweys, Tatibandh, Raipur Nurbber Insuronce Company Ltd. Vehicts No. M.H.29-H-8093) s Dtvisional Manager, Oivision 2, Deyendra N090- Rocsd, lex, Raipur, C.©. Shoi, 5/o Subhash ^hai, aged ;rs. hoi, D/o Subhash ©hai.aged 19 No.3 and 4 are R/o Slice-3, 'cn, Hirapur, Polics Station ct Raipur, C.6. or the petitioners. respondent N'o.2. ^espondent No.3 & 4. ^ ."HC—78 311^1V R'fi'* TraT sfn^r sD^iqi ^Sf •<{WI<'\^,yflly'Ko, f°l<'ll<H'j,< *ll*lCTlth*lt<h """""""""""" """"""""""TFI^ 200 SII^I'T^F (1^f3^t?) wnw ^ifei sffl^ii Arftic Heard. iy this petition under petitioners ha.ve. impugried the ^ Motor Accidental Ciaims Tritl whereby application of the ;s.l,50,000/- fromtheirtermtj Leamed counsel for fr| tribunal vide award dated 31.11 awarded a sum of Rs.2,40,000 claims tribunai has directed thl Rs.60,000/- & Rs.90,000/- be| fixed term in the name of thel appiication before -tiie claims above amount on the qround the marriage of their daughtef the loan from an individual rejected by the claims tribunal the amount is atteged to have ^' Learned counsel for the petit^ assianed for withdrowal of th® 'tiltlft'l'fl'l ttWcif ^fft^ <(»]«;]< ^arfin sil^l Arfticle 227 of the Constitution of India the jrder dated 29.1.2007 passed by the Chief junal, Raipur in Claim Case No.l8/2( pet|!'ioners herein for permission to withdraw jeposit accounts has been rejected. |e petitioners submits that the claims |2006 passed in Claim Case No.18/05 has to the petitioners/claimants. However, the bt out of the awarded sum, an amount of deposited in any nationaiized bank for a Ipetitioners. The petitioners have filed an tribuna! for permission +o withdraw the 1h4t tiiey had spent a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- in solemnized on 21.6.2006 after obtaining p^rson. However, the said cpplication was on the ground tiiat the person from whom leen tcken on !oon has not been examined. loners further submits that the reasons |amount is bonafide as they have to return ^ '•»,.' •^^ Sffl^l'WfiFITC '(WT SIT^T ^t^i<t> <z- TST '*iwwi, ®-flly<i<o,fs|<ni+iy *II*ICTI a»*iith"""""""""""""""""""""""""""^^200 S^f '^^; (^qF^at^) TODW^ftgaiiiSi 3- fln the loan amount to fne said ought to have. permitt-ed the pe^ Tdking into conSideratio^ tribunal is directed to relea^ account of petitioner No.l-; Wi+h the aforesald direc'l i!hi<iitff4if*i 'sws^^ fe^ <r^t$i< ^sfRpTsn^T igrez Singh and ther-efore, the tribunal itioners to withdraw +he aboye amount. fne overal! circumstonces, the claims a sum of Rs.60,000/- deposited in the ash 6hai. ion, the petition is disposed of. ; Sd/- OiurendraMishra Judge nBAt^l°fiTgs°IRKT,Wif.IRilig:—FS/197—3/2008—-40,000;