^^c^' a A- . ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. <?1Z>2-2- / 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Vijay Agrawal, S/o. Late Lal Chand Agrawal, Aged about 48 years, R/o Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1.8tate of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) ^?^f WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OE1NDIA /..."°° /. -\^?^- ,^<:'::li.-^" ^^^ b... ^^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRTT PETmON (C) No. 7322 of2011 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Vijay Agrawal. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjnON OF INDLA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shasharik Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits fhat the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Amiexure P/l), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized constmction raised by the petitioner, has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus, nothing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infi^ictuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become mfructuous. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge Amit