IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 CRP.No. 980 of 2004() -------------------------------- OS.1705/1999 of II ADDL.M.C.,TRIVANDRUM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PLAINTIFFS: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. SABEENA, W/O. SHAHABUDEEN, AGED 31 YEARS KUNNATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU, CHEMPAZHANTHY, ULIYAAZHUTHURA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHAMEENA, D/O. SHIHABUDEEN, (MINOR) AGED 8 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUNNATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU, CHEMPAZHANTHY, ULIYAZHUTHURA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN SHIHABUDEEN, 4TH PETITIONER. 3. THESIMA, D/O. SHIHABUDEEN (MINOR) AGED 6 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUNNATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU, CHEMPAZHANTHY, ULILYAZHUTHURA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN, SHIHABUDEEN, 4TH PETITIONER. * 4. SHIHABUDEEN, S/O. ADIMA AHAMAD PILLAI, AGED 54 YEARS, KUNNATHUVILA VEEDU, ANIYOOR, CHEMPAAZHANTHY. * (DIED) * PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ARE RECORDED AS LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED 4TH PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DTD. 07.02/2008 IN CRP. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): DEFENDANTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. S.N. TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, S.N.TRUST OFFICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNSIL, S.N. TRUST, CHEMPAZHANTHY P.O., REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR. tss C.R.P. NO.980/2004 3. THE PRINCIPAL, S.N.COLLEGE, CHEMPAZHANTHY. * 4. LAILA BEEVI, W/O. SUBAIR KHAN, RESIDING AT KUNNATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU ULILYAZHATHURA VILLAGE, ANIYOOR, CHEMPAAZHANTHI. * (DELETED) *THE 4TH RESPONDENT IN THE PARTY ARRAY IS DELETED AS PER ORDER ON 29/10/2010 IN IA, 2721/2010 IN CRP. 980/2004. R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2011 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ C.R.P.No.980 Of 2004 ---------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011. O R D E R Heard both sides. 2. The revision petition is filed by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.1705 of 1999 on the file of the Additional Munsiff Court, Thiruvananthapuram, challenging the dismissal of the suit. The revision petitioners as plaintiffs filed the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, praying for passing a decree to direct the defendants to restore the plaintiffs' possession of plaint B schedule property as it existed until and prior to 18.8.1999 and in the alternative to permit them to recover possession of plaint B schedule property from the defendants, their men or agents through the process of law and for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove the obstruction to the enjoyment of C schedule pathway by dismantling the newly put up walls around plaint B schedule property and for a prohibitory injunction. During the pendency of the review petition the parties settled the disputes. Accordingly, they filed I.A.No.2564 ::2:: C.R.P.No.980 Of 2004 of 2010 praying to record the compromise and to pass orders in accordance with law. 3. The terms agreed between the parties are recited in I.A.No.2564 of 2010 in R.P.No.620 of 2009. The said terms are recorded. In view of the compromise, the dismissal of the suit by the court below is set aside and a decree in terms of compromise is passed. Annexures A to C are received in evidence as additional documents. The three plans marked as C, C1 and C2 produced along with I.A.No.349 of 2011 shall form part of the order. The civil revision petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-