IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51493 of 2008 MUKESH MEHTA, Son of Triveni Mehta, resident of Village- Kumarpur, P.S. Bihariganj, District- Madhepura………Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar…………………………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 19.03.2009. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. Allegation against the petitioner is that he forcibly enticed the girl Priyanka Kumari daughter of the informant for marriage purposes. Statement of the victim girl Priyanka Kumari was recorded under Section 164 Cr. P. C. there she has stated that at the pistol point she was taken away forcibly. Her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner. She was kept in confinement. When she was recovered her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr. P. C. Considering this statement, prayer on behalf of petitioner Mukesh Mehta in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 188 of 2008 is rejected. U.K. (Mridula Mishra,J)