IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Revision No.2355 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 19, 2007 Tulsa Singh and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Parvesh Saini, Advocate, for Dr.Sushil Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.S.S.Mor, Sr.DAG, Haryana. Mr.Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. .. Counsel for the petitioners contends that since all the petitioners have been discharged by the trial court, therefore, this petition for setting aside the summoning order dated 22.3.2006 passed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and the order dated 17.8.2006, whereby charges have been framed against the petitioners, has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. March 19, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE