IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.557 of 2006 DEVENDRA SINGH @ DEVENDRA PD.SINGH Versus BALIRAM SHARMA @ BALRAM SHARMA ----------- 3 15.10.2008 Heard counsel for the parties. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order allowing amendment in the plaint for incorporating a subsequent event does not in any way prejudice the defendant-petitioner inasmuch as by the said amendment neither the nature of the suit would change nor any admission would be withdrawn. Such routine amendment in the pleading for incorporating a subsequent event could not have been infact refused by the Court below on any ground whatsoever. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order which is a speaking and well considered order dealing with all the possible facets, and that too complete precision and clarity, in terms of order VI Rule 17 C .P.C.. This Civil Revision application being thus devoid of any merit is accordingly dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)