IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:8105 of 2005 Between: M/s.Srikar Rice & Solvent Industries Pvt.Ltd., Regd.Office 6-255, R.K.Complex, Opp:M.P.P.Office, Shabunagar, Miryalaguda-508 207, Nalgonda District rep., by its Managing Director Ranga Srinivasu, s/o Kondaiah, age 44 years, 6-255, R.K.Complex, Miryalaguda. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department, Govt. of A.P., Miryalaguda. 2 Authorised Officer, State bank of Hyderabad, SIB Branch, Miryalaguda. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned letter No.92/05 dated 4.4.2005 communicated by the 1st respondent demanding to pay Stamp duty @ 11% and 0.5% towards Registration fee on the attracting market value in respect of the Sale Certificate (for immovable property) dated 29.3.2005 issued by the 2nd respondent under Rule 9(6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Act, 2002 as totally illegal, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to receive and register the document as per law by charging 5% of the duty against the purchase money mentioned in the Sale Certificate.” At the hearing, Sri S.Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing this writ petition, the respondents registered the document in favour of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.10744 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JULY, 2008. kvni