^- Cf^ \^r~0 IILTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W . P. (81 N0. / 2007 Petitioner ; 'l,,\isSmt. Lissv Rov, ^1'1 ' . - —" \'J.-"^}'"" .. W/o Dr.M.G.Roymon, Aged >^o"-^\ft.!-'" ..-••" . . - . . ^e':^ ••••' about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Prunary School, Kohaka No.l, BUilai, Dist : Durg-(C.G.) ^ . .-:"."~v:.- diffY^ ^•••"^^/"" •y/••••'" l^s.--"" Versus Respondents : i) ^- State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) Directorate of Public Instruction, Raipur-(C.G.) District Education Officer, Durg-(C.G.) !: ;;. '••<• S: WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICE 22^6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Thakur HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. 1286 of 2007 OtsStioner SmS. Lissy Roy 4 j .a-^rw^/t.^ t. i-.¥tAii Versus Rsspondsnts Stete of Chhsttisgarh & otfters SB: Hon'bto wr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri S. K. Thomas, Advocat®for Uie petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Depufr/ Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 2"'1 day of March, 2007} The foilowing order of ths Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihobi, J. ;ounse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the question of iaw invoived in this petition is governed by the circular dated 20.1.1887. Ths High Court of Macjhya Pradesh, Indore Bench, in She case of Indraveer Singh ToRiar Vs. Stete of M.P. and others { 2004 (2) M.P.H.T. 3 (NOC)}, has considered the issue and disposed of the said matter in the following temis:- "2..........1n view of thte submission advanced by Counsel for partiss, this petition is dlsposed of by gj'ving foltowing directions. The respondent No.1 shal! consider petitioner's representattons rsferrsd to above and dispose of the same at an eariy date, preferably •A'ithin a period of 3 months from the date of communication of tftis order in accordance with 2. Leamed cos keeping in mind ttie circulars issued by State Govt. as also the directions giv'en bythe Tribuns! in similar matters." counsei appearing for the parties would jointty submit and admit that ttis case, belng simiiar in nature, is squareiy covered by the dectsion tn se case of tndraveer Singh Tomar (supra). 3. In view of the aforestated reasons, this petition is disposed of vfl'th liberty to the pet'tioner to make a representation atong with a copy of the order passed in the case of Indraveer Singh Tomar (supra), whfch may be considered and decided, in asx;qrdance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge