1 4822.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4822 OF 2010 Shri Gaikwad Suresh Laxman ...Petitioner Versus The Chief Executive Officer & Ors. ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3. Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.4. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 23, 2011. P.C. Re : Explanation of the Registry 1. Perused the explanation offered by the concerned Officer. We are appalled to notice that Officer who is not conversant with the procedure in Writ Petition Branch was asked to attend to matters pertaining to that Branch. It, more than being a mistake of the said Officer, is the mistake of the Registrar and more so, the Section Officer who had assigned the said work to Smt.Kumbhare in Writ Petition Branch. The said officers would owe explanation. The Registrar (Judicial) may examine the same and ensure that in future such Officers are not posted to attend to work of 2 4822.10 preparation of Board of the Judges. As aforesaid, the Section Officer being overall incharge of the Writ Petition Branch cannot be absolved on the basis of the explanation offered by the ill-equipped Officer. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)