IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2011 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 16527 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KRISHNA PODUVAL, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. EASWARAN NAMBOODIRI, THEKKEPUTHENPURACKAL, MOOZHIKKULAM, KURUMASSERY P.O., ALUVA,PIN-683 579. BY ADV. MR. S.SUDHISH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 003. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PARAVUR GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN-683 513. 3. THE SUB GROUP OFFICER, THIRUMOOZHIKKULAM DEVASWOM, KURUMASSERY P.O., ALUVA, PIN-683 579. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682030 5. THE HEAD SURVEYOR, ALUVA TALUK, ALUVA, PIN 683101 R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR. G.BIJU, STANDING COUNSEL R4 AND R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 16527 OF 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO 4301/08 DATED 15.07.2008 EXT. P2 :TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 12.05.2008 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER PARAKKADAVU EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX REGISTER ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARAKKADAVU ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 17.03. 2011 EXT. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C) NO. 22123/2010 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 15.07.2010 EXT. P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT PREPARED BY THE 5TH RESPONDEN,T EXT. P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 11.05.2011 EXT. P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE A/D CARD SHOWING THE ACCEPTANCE OF EXT.P6 BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No . 16527 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 21st June , 2011 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the grievance projected in this writ petition has already been brought up for consideration before the 4th respondent, by filing Ext. P6 complaint, which is pending consideration before the said respondent and that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the 4th respondent to have it considered and finalized in accordance with law, within a reasonable time. 2. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 4 and 5. 3. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P6 in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. W.P. (C) No. 16527 of 2011 : 2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the 4th respondent for further steps. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd