'-•^ 'iiit?" ?f?-ft(t"S K~r^vg': A^-'^^^ .....•-^s^-"""" ^^es^"^ ^* /f- f-zys y<eW THE HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR rC.Gl W.P. fS) N0. 2-^2-^ /2007 PETITIONER T'- RESPQNDENTS 1 Umashanker Dansena Aged about 44Years, S/o. Shri Ghasiya Ram Dansena, Assistant Teacher, Janpad Primary School, Singhitarai, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Janjgir-Champa District Jangir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *11*1MI S1*1icb 's^ "iii^io'ii,»Tflu'is,RK-ii'tiy r^-^ ; f;c.f?.f.^.'i/..d2. W^ 200 Sll^l iiach ('i^^8'^') sn^r^rf?^ (raT3I1S?Tsb*1 gT(TraT(Tf^tT3TI^T +i'!i[i-<41-f tiit<cfTff)3t3'<f"]'t^i< ^STf^TSII^T Bablu 16.1.2007 Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel fo^ the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel la»y|erfor •the respondents/State. Wrt+i the consent of leame(J counsel for the parties, the matters are heor-d finally and disposed of. Order dictated in W.P. (s) l^lo. 238 of 2007 in open Court, paswd 1 separately. A copy of this order be pla^ed on record in other connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge .^ P.T.O. M 13. HI6HCOURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILA5PUR W. P.(S) No. 238 of 2007 Petitioner : Shyam Lal Sickir Versus Re^ondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others W. P.(S) No. 241 of 2007 Petitioner : Balram Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others And A, W. P.(S) No. 242 of 2007 Petitioner : Umashankar Dansena Versus Re^iondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh & others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel for the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jaun, Panel lawyer for -the respondents/State. OR DER (Passed on this 18tit Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel cppewing for -the petitioners as wetl as leamed Panel lawyer cppearing for the State/reqiondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P.(S) No. 6884/2006 (Bhikham 5in9h Sinha Vs. State of ChhdrttiS9<»rh & others), which wos disposed of vide order dated 12 becember, 2006. They further submit that •the question of hw involved is also the same. ^9 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counselfor the parties, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th Oecember, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P.(S) No. 6884/2006 (Bhikham Singh Sinha Vs. State of Chhanisgarh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record in other connected writ petttions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge