IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44363 of 2008 AKHILESH KUMAR RAI @ AKHILESH RAI SON OF SRI KISHUN RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RUSTAMPUR(TINPAIRIYA),P.S.RAGHOPUR,DISTT.VAISHALI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 13.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for offence under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. A plea was taken by the petitioner that the case has been compromised because the informant has lodged the case on account of some confusion and when confusion vanished, then he filed a petition of compromise. In view of the submissions, notice was issued to the informant. The informant has appeared through his learned lawyer but neither he nor his learned lawyer has come to oppose the prayer for bail. The petitioner is in jail custody since 12.12.2006. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Vaishali in Raghopur P.S.Case No. 26 of 2006. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)