IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.2110 of 2007 Rajendra Sah & Ors Versus Ramjee Roy & Ors ---------------------------------- 9 12-12-2011 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Madhav Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, has submitted that an appeal lies against the impugned order, as provided under Rule 103 of Order 21 C.P.C., as by the impugned order the court below has adjudicated the claim of the petitioners under Order 21 Rules 97 and 99 C.P.C. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioners has made a prayer to withdraw this revision application in order to enable him to file an appeal against the impugned order in accordance with law. The prayer is allowed. The revision application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. However, it is observed that if the petitioners will file an appeal within the period of four weeks from today, the pendency of this revision application before this Court shall be considered at the time of considering the prayer for condonation of delay in accordance with law. roy ( V. Nath, J.)