IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32132 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- L.INDIRA, W/O. VIJAYAN, AGED 39 YEARS, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, ONNAMCHIRAPPARA, KOLIYAKKODE, NEYYARDAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.SANTHARAM SRI.ANTO THOMAS SRI.LAKSHMEESH.S.KAMATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, FOREST AND WILD LIFE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (ADMINISTRATION), FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE WILD LIFE WARDEN, WILD LIFE DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE ASST. WILD LIFE WARDEN, NEYYAR WILD LIFE SANCTUARY, NEYYARDAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.32132 OF 2009 (J) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is a Part Time Sweeper in the office of the 5th respondent for the past 22 years. On that basis he is claiming regularization in service relying on Ext.P3 Government Order and Exts.P1 and P2 judgments of this court. It is stated that the petitioner has filed Exts.P4 to P7 representations before respondents 4 and 5 and that a decision on the said representations also is yet to be taken. 2. Having regard to the above, I feel that the matter needs to be considered and therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions. 3. Respondents 4 and 5 shall deal with Exts.P4 to P7 representations referred to above, in the light of Ext.,P3 Government Order and shall make a proposal to the first respondent who shall consider the proposal and pass orders thereon in the light of Ext.P3 Government Order and in the light of Exts.P1 and P2 judgments. WPC.No.32132 /09 :2 : 4. Until orders are passed as above, status quo as on date, as regards the continuance of the petitioner shall be maintained. 5. Respondents 4 and 5 shall make a proposal within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the judgment and on its receipt the first respondent shall pass final orders as directed above within 3 months thereafter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before respondents 4 and 5 and the Ist respondent for compliance . (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/