SSSsS: ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATQRE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASi^UR, IT PETITION N0. -S-S^L/2003 .^•^ PETITIONH? ./ ^^ .y<^y ^-'y®^' ^" s ^'^ dl/ , ^ T. Shrinivas Reddy s/o Shrl T. chinna Babu Reddy aged about 24 years residait of osurl shanker />und Servj.ce-Balaji Nager Khursipar Zone-2 Bhilai Distt. Durg- 490011 (GHHftTTISGARH). ^' . ^ / VSRSUS '_(!') Union of Indla. through Secretary Defenee Ml.niscry Govts'.of India. (2) The chlef of the Army Staff Array Head Quarters New Delhi. J3) Colonol Dlrector Recruiting / zonal Recrui.tment centre Jabalpur (M.P.) / / <-(4) conunanding officer Ad-ARTY- f ' Records Nasik Roa<3 Cdap-422102 Maharastra. (5) commanding OJEficer Branch Recruiting Office un4.'< campus Raipur (chl^ct.i.sgarh). •'WRAT PETITION UNDSi ARTICLE. 226/227 OP T9'fe CWSTITUTION OF INOIA la %?^^s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 531 of 2003 J Petitioner T. Shruuvas Reddy Versus Respondents Union of India & others (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri J. S. Barik, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Ms Fouzia Mirza, Assistaat SoUcitor General for fhe respondeats. O RD B R (oralt ( Passed on this 14th day of December, 2009) Heartl. 1. Learued counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subimts that in view of the fact that Armed Forces Tribunat has coine in existence to consider the inatters relatmg to the ofBcers/officials employed ia the araied forces, fhe petitioner seeks to wdfhdraw this petition wifh liberty to take recoiirse to the jurisdiction ofthe Armed Forces Tribunal. 2. Learaed couiisel appearing for the respondents have no objection. 3. In view of fhe above, the writ petition is disixiissed as ^vithdrawn, with the above-stated liberty, tf so advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thalmr