-£1' lN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM OFZDER SHEET Writ petition ( C) ..No.14 of 2008 Rose...Valley...enain..Marketing..Systemapetitioner/Appellant Ltd. & anr. Versus State of Sikkim & Ors. Plespondent Order with Sigriature Off ice Note as to action (if any) taken on Order, 1. 14.5.0 Phesent: Mr. 8. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jiwan RT. marga and Mr. T. Namgyal, Advoc.ates for the Petitioners. Mr. J.B. Pradhan and Mr. Karma Thinlay, Govt. Advocates for the State-Respondents. This is a writ petition on the first day of its admission. 'The wit petitioner is an incorporated comfany and clains to be a corporate agent ofi LIC. According to them they were having insurance business in Sikkim on i the basis of a permission granted in the year 2006 by the State and allegedly they were doing quite well. In 2008, the permission has been withdrawn. It is against the said withdrawal that the said writ petitioner has come to Court. The ihrit petitioner has been unable to explain the basis of grant of permission i.e. the law under which such permission was given. The wit petitioner can also give no explanation 0 ?(I SerialNo.ofOrder I DateofOrder Order with Signature Office Note as toaction(ifany)takenonOrder II(II I,I.11,ciIII of the meaning of their licence (Annexure P-2) -_ which allows them to procure or solicit insurance business "of one life insurer".Thewitpetitionerfurthercan give no explanation why they should be entertained, since the licence states (Annexure P-2) that it is for 3 years from 2.12.2002. This period expired even before they got their licence from the State of sikrfu in 2oo6.Therespondents submit that the licence was issued nonetheless, but they point out this factor to the Court today.Thewritpetitioners submit on the basis of inexure P-8 that even if their licence as per Annexure P-2 has expired, the LIC has no problem wi.th it because a let,ter of eulogy and congratulation has been received by them, dated 28.04.2008 (Annexure P-8), signed allegedly by the Regional Manager (Mktg./B & AC). The name of the said Regional Manager is not mentioned. Althougi the said annexure is a photocopy, no signatul.e has come up in the i :(3III'1 photocopy in the writ petition. The alleged letter is mentioned in paragraph 15 of the writ petition only, which is verified as a submission. I--