IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. THURSDAY THE TWENTYNINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMAI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WA.NOs. 464, 475 AND 493 OF 2004. Between: W.A.NO. 4 6 4 OF 2004 The Mahalakshmi Co-operative House Building Society, Represented by its President, Sri Lanka Ramachandraiah … Appellant-3rd party V/s. Kilaru Usha Rani & 5-Ors. … Respondents W.A.NO. 4 7 5 OF 2004 The Mahalakshmi Co-operative House Building Society, Represented by its President, Sri Lanka Ramachandraiah … Appellant-3rd party V/s. Kilaru Koteswari & 5-Ors. … Respondents W.A.NO. 4 9 3 OF 2004 The Mahalakshmi Co-operative House Building Society, Represented by its President, Sri Lanka Ramachandraiah … Appellant-3rd party V/s. K.Venkamma (died) & 5-Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Appellants : Sri R.G. SHASHIDHAR SINGH Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Assignment Sri P. Venugopal Sri M. Chandrasekhara Rao THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMAI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WA.NOs. 464, 475 AND 493 OF 2004. COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari). 1. W.A.No. 464 of 2004, W.A.No.475 of 2004 and W.A.No.493 of 2004 are filed against common order dated 08- 7-2003 passed in WP.No. 21708 of 1999, W.P.No. 11224 of 1997 and W.P.No.9377 of 1997 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge allowed the main writ petition by setting aside the impugned orders in question and directed the Government to consider the application of the petitioner dated 10-10-1994 afresh in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.186, Revenue (UC-II) Department, dated 02-3-1977 and to pass appropriate orders within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 2. When the matters are listed today under the caption for final hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Assignment submitted that in view of repealing of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for brevity ‘The Act’), no cause of action survives for adjudication of these writ appeals. 3. Recording the above submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Assignment and more particularly there is no denial from the official respondents that possession has been taken. Further there is no material placed before this Court on behalf of the official respondents that possession has been taken by the competent authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. 4. Under the above circumstances, we deem it appropriate to dispose of all these writ appeals in view of repealing of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 as no cause of action survives for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, these writ appeals are disposed of. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI ________________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 29-X-2009. I s L THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMAI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WA.NOs. 464, 475 AND 493 OF 2004. COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari). COMPUTER No. 43 29-X-2009. I s L