IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3274 of 2008 FUDANI KUAR @ FUDENA KUAR WIFE OF LATE HIRALAL PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BAHIRO, P.S. NAWADA, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR……………………………. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. M. SHARWANAM, THE D.M. ROHTAS AT SASARAM 3. RANJAN KUMAR SINHA, THE ESTABLISHMENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 4. GIRIJA NAND KAPARI, THE CIRCLE OFFICER, DAWATH, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 5. MD. JAMIL, THE PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM 6. I.S.D. DHALIWAL, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR………… OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2 21-07-2010 Heard the parties. The writ court granted relief to the petitioner by holding that pension of her deceased husband should be re-decided on the basis of actual pay which he was getting at the time of his death. It has further observed that in case any recovery has been made on that count from the petitioner then such amount must be repaid to the petitioner without any delay. It appears that pension has been re-decided by the authorities as per direction of the writ court but there is some dispute whether any amount was recovered from the petitioner and whether such recovered amount has been re-paid to her or not. In the facts of the case the M.J.C. application is disposed of with agreement of the parties that on representation being filed by the petitioner, the District Magistrate, Rohtas and the concerned officials shall verify the present state of facts and if it is found that any recovery has been made from the petitioner then as per direction of the writ court 2 such amount must be repaid to her within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)