IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8444 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 12, 2011. Naresh Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rajesh K.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners are member of the Punjab Agricultural Service (Class-I) and are working as such on various posts in the Agricultural and Horticulture Department, Government of Punjab. They seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant them pre-revised pay scale of Rs.2200-4000 w.e.f. 1.1.1986 with consequential revisions from later dates in terms of the decision dated 29.9.2006 passed by this Court in CWP No.457 of 1995 (Prem Singh Gill and others versus State of Punjab (Annexure P-4). CWP No.8444 of 2011 [2] During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 2.3.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.13615 of 2009 (Dr.Yadwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others). The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in Dr.Yadwinder Singh and others' case (supra). Dasti. May 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE