MC 1014/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Phukan, learned coun sel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 6. None appears for the other respond ents, despite service. The applicant by the present application is seeking condonation of delay of 22 d ays in preferring the appeal. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon perusal of t he averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay, I am of the v iew that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in not preferring the a ppeal in time and hence the delay of 22 days occurred in filing the appeal is co ndoned. Misc. Case stands allowed.