mm@ Egg a. z waxw7/ SB. §Service Matter! IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT ‘ BILASPUR1CHHATTISGARH] WRIT PETITIONis) No. ESE (2010. PETITIQNER: y Devmanjas Ekka, so_n of Late Mansukh Ekka, aged about 57 years, residence of Behind Cold Store, Patpariya, (Menendragarh Road), Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Resgondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Versus 1". State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattjsgarh.‘ / 2. Engineer-In—Chief, Water Resources Department, Raipur, Chhaattisgarh. / 3. Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department, Hasdeo Basin, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. :IL @ ; : ‘ Wm...‘uf92 L}. mm (Wu) WWW W S7 //v‘m zoo mmfa‘w‘ia; ammm mwwwm ammm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J. 23-06-20 10 Shri C.’J.K. Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt Heard. Chailenge in this petition is to the order dated 8.6.2009 order granting benefit of increments, in who have not passed Hindi ’I‘ypewriting led. (Annexure A-l), whefeby the respect of Assistant Grade-III Examination, has been cancel Advocate for the State/respondents. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of thi: Vs. State of C.G. &' othei connected matters decided or prays that this petition may Kurup (supra), to which learn objection. Accordingly, the writ pe in the case of Ramchandra I 8.6.2009 (Annexure P—l), dii quashed. No recovery of payment of annual increments to the petitioner can be made pursuant to the impugned order. If the amount l Court rendered in Ramchandra Kurup 's [W.P. (S) No.3663/2009] and other 23rd November, 2009. Learned counsel be disposed of in terms of Ramchandra 3d counsel appearing for the State has no tition is allowed in terms of order passed Iurup (supra). The impugned order dated 'ecting recovery of annual increment is 5? . W?W Irv: zoo mm (Wu) man 11%?! m WW?W ‘ 1%.?”1m ”z, $ aifrm 311%“ has already been recovered, the petitioner is entitled to the said amount with interest at the ralteof 6% per annum. >14, No order as to costs. . \\ ‘ Sdl— ‘\ Shrivasta‘la/A Braveen ¥ i Mamndra Mohan Judge