IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO.4526 of 2008 Between: A. Sarveshwar Goud S/o. Hussainaiah Goud, Srisaialam Project, Srisailam, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Prades, Revenue (Endowments-II) Department, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Endowments Departments, Hyderabad. 3 Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvarla Devasthanam Srisailam, Kurnool District, Rep. by its Executive Officer & Deputy Commissioner. 4 P. Rama Murthy Kalyanakatta-I, Srisailam, Kurnool. 5 P. Shankar Kalyanakatta-II, Srisailam, Kurnool. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing the impugned memo No. 70783/Endts. II(1)/2007 dt. 18-1-2008 approving the bids for Kalyanakatta-I & II of the 3rd Respondent temple as arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to G.O.ms.No. 866 and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to conduct fresh auction for lease hold rights of human hairs in respect of Kalyanakatta-I & II of the 3rd Respondent temple as per the orders of the 2nd respondent dt. 18-12- 2007 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ________________ C.V.RAMULU, J 12th FEBRUARY, 2009 kvni