IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.596 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Abdulla S/o Khalil R/o Village Jenpur Khurd, P.S. Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: June 22, 2010 Arising out of Case Crime No.42 of 2010 Under Section 307/34 of IPC, P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. S.K. Shandiliya, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Government Advocate for the State as well as Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the complainant. Perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that in the FIR, it has been shown that the applicant along with other co-accused, namely, Khalil, Farooq and Arif caused injuries to Rijwan on 16.3.2010 at 7 AM. Learned Addl. GA for the State submitted that during the course of investigation, the Investigating Officer has recorded the statement of the injured Rijwan u/s 161 Cr.P.C. in which he has stated that injuries were caused to him by co-accused Farooq with Tamancha. Learned counsel for the applicant further argued that the co-accused Khalil has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.4.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Abdulla be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 22.06.2010 RG