WA 132/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR J CHELAMESWAR HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY The appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner by the aggrieved by an order date d 29-4-09 by which it was recorded that the interim order granted earlier on 5-6 -08 lapsed on 11-12-08. The writ petition was filed aggrieved by the decision of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 not to consider the financial bid of the appellant he rein in view of the conclusion reached by them that their technical bid was foun d to be non responsive in the context of the NIT dated 2-1-08. In the background of the above initially an interim order, referred to a bove was passed by the learned Judge of this court directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 not to finalise the tender. The interim order was extended subsequently. By the order under challenge in the present appeal, as already noticed, the learned Judge recorded a finding that the said interim order lapsed. It appears that in view of the questions involved and the importance of the matter the writ petition itself was directed to be listed for hearing and in fact the matter was listed on more than one occasion before a learned Judge of this court. For various reasons, which may not be relevant at this stage, the ma tter could not be heard. In view of the impugned order in the present appeal the appellant appreh ends that the tender process would be finalised and hence the present writ appea l. In the background of the above mentioned facts we are of the opinion tha t it is better that the writ petition itself is heard and disposed of. The learned counsel for the parties agree that the matter be heard on 2-6-09. The Registry is directed to list the writ petition on 2-6-09 before the appropri ate Bench subject to part heard. In the circumstances we are also of the opinion that the respondent Nos.1 to 4 be directed not to finalise the tender process t ill 2-6-09. We are informed by Mr MZ Ahmed, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 that the tender process has not yet been finalised. We also deem it appropriate to place on record that it is desirable that the wri t petition be heard and disposed of on 2-6-09. The appeal stands disposed of.