GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6038 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.6038 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.6038 OF 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. -------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Amit Sale, for the Petitioner Mr. T.S. Ingale, for the Respondent No.4. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for State. CORAM :F.I. REBELLO & MRS.R.S.DALVI,JJ. CORAM :F.I. REBELLO & MRS.R.S.DALVI,JJ. CORAM :F.I. REBELLO & MRS.R.S.DALVI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 14,2005 DATED : NOVEMBER 14,2005 DATED : NOVEMBER 14,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner seeks compassionate appointment in the office of respondent No.4. The respondent NO.4 has passed a resolution that appointments can be given to the petitioner in Class IV and the proposal has been forwarded to Respondent No.2 for consideration. By communication of 25th April, 2005 the respondent No.3 had informed the respondent NO.4 that no appointment should be done by way of promotion, compassionate appointment, etc., without obtaining sanction from the respondent No.2. In view of that respondent No.4 has forwarded the proposals to the respondent NO.2. Those proposals are pending with respondent No.2. 3. Considering the above, respondent NO.2 considering the staff pattern to decide whether appointments can be made on compassionate basis as it is contended by the petitioner there are over 23 vacancies of Class IV post in the office of respondent NO.4. On behalf of respondent NO.4, learned Counsel points out that they have forwarded necessary details of staff pattern on 18th June, 2005 to Respondent NO.2. Respondent NO.2 to take a decision within four weeks from today and communicate the same to respondent No.4. 4. If the respondent NO.2 grants approval for staff pattern the respondent No.3 is directed to grant sanction for appointment of the petitioner. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) (MRS.R.S. DALVI, J.) MRS.R.S. DALVI, J.) MRS.R.S. DALVI, J.)