1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9561 of 2011 1.KUMAR @ KOMBAIAH 2.BOSE @ MUTHURAMALINGAM 3.C.POOLAIAH @ POOLPANDIAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs 1.THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATCHANALLUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K.N.KATJU MARG POLICE STATION, OUTER DISTRICT, DELHI. F.I.R.NO.200 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.ANAND Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondents in connection with the case in Cr.No.200 of 2011 on the file of the second respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court with the present petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.The second respondent is the Inspector of Police, K.N.Katju Marg Police Station, Outer District, Delhi. The question is in respect of the offences said to have been committed within the Union Territory of Delhi and in connection with a case being investigated by the Second respondent, whether any order of anticipatory bail can be granted in this case by this Court. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the second respondent may seek the help of the first respondent to arrest the petitioners in the State of Tamil Nadu. In my considered opinion, it is not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 so. When the petitioners have got remedy in the appropriate court in the Union Terriotory of delhi, in my considered view, this Court cannot issue any direction which will amount to interference with the jurisdiction of some other court. Hence, no relief as prayed for can be granted, more particularly, because the learned Public Prosecutor would submit that the second respondent has not made any such request or direction to the first respondent to arrest the petitioner. 4.In view of the same, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATCHANALLUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K.N.KATJU MARG POLICE STATION, OUTER DISTRICT, DELHI. 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9561 of 2011 Date :11/10/2011 TR :18.10.2011: 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/