HI6H COURT OF CHHATriS©AftHAT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No463 <yf 2007 Petltioner Non-appiicant ResRQndent AppJJcant RawbhajQn Son of Shri Paras Yaday, aaed about 28 years, Caste Ahir, Resident of Viiiage Darripara, Post Bhdyathan, Tahsjl Surajpur, bistnct Surouja (C.^.). Versus Smt.Shiy ICumari ^ Sunita Wife of Shrs Rambhajwi, aaed about 25 years, Caste Ahir, pr^esentiy residing at Vitiage Khor>ma, Po'ice Station and Tahsil Pratappur, District Surguja (C.6.) (PETETION UNbEft SECTCON 482 OF Cr.P.C.) (SB? Hon'bteMr.T..P. Shorme, J.) ^r. Ashok Kumar Shuk'a, counset for the petitioner. ORDER 0>ass^ cn Ist S®pt©mbs.r,2009) 1. The petitioner has flled th?s petition under" Section 482 of the Code of Crlrninal Procedure, 1973 (in short ^he Code') for quashment of the order dated 6<2,2007 passed by 1+ie Second Additional Sesmons Judge (FTC), Surajpur, in Criminal ftevision No.72/2006 affirming the order dated 28.1.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pratappur, in Criminal Case No.43/2004 whereby Itearned Judlcial M^gi^trate pir^t Cia^s ha<c awarded the m^intenance of fts.700/- pe-r wonth to the respondent who is (egatly wedded wife of the petitloner. 2. Quashment is prayed on the ground that wlthout there being any reasonabte case, the respondent is tiving separately from the petjtioner. 3. I have heard (earned counse! for the petltionar and perused the c-rTter impugned, order of the trla! Court end other docunients fifed on behatf of the petitioner< B/- - 2.— 4. From pBrusal of the order Impugned and order ^f ^ie triat Court, It appears that the respondent has bdlged a report agajnst the petEtioner rejating to demo-nd of dowry and the petittoner has contacted second marriage^ ^e^ two grounds are sufflcient for wlfe to !ivt separately from her husband and cteim of mathtenance. ^ 1 do not fmd ar»y scope of jnterference In exercise of extraordinar^ inherent Jurisdlctjon. Consequently, the petitten js (iabie to be disrpJssed and jt is hereby djswissed. _„-_ Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge 71 \'/ ^—^