1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1482 OF 2010 (Hira Bhurya Dhikar .v. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.A. Mohta, Advocate for the applicant. Shri J.B. Jaiswal, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 12TH OCTOBER, 2010. Heard. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is falsely involved in the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Dharni Police Station. The case put up by the investigating agency is that the applicant came to know about the illicit intimacy between his wife Kamlabai and deceased Pannalal. On the ground of this illicit intimacy, the applicant has committed murder of deceased Pannalal. He further submits that except suspicion, there is no material available against the applicant. Learned APP has filed reply. Record is produced. Perusal of the record shows that the statements of villagers as well as the wife of the applicant namely Kamlabai are recorded. The villagers, namely, Dayaram and Maujilal state in their statements that they saw the applicant in the intervening night of 10.04.2010 and 11.04.2010 coming out of the hutment. On asking, the applicant did not give any reply. Learned APP submits that the witness Kamlabai is a material witness and if the applicant is released on bail, there is apprehension that the applicant may pressurize the witness Kamlabai who is the wife of the applicant. In view of the record so far collected the apprehension expressed by the learned APP cannot be said to be not justified. There is prima facie material against the applicant. 2 In my opinion, no case is made out to enlarge the applicant on bail. In the result, the application is rejected. JUDGE *rrg.