m:w COURT cr (MH^rrise.wHAT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. 1527 af £007 Srot. Amrika Bai, W/o Prcisdd aged about 21) Sotnami, R/o Vittage Ouilapur P.5. & Tohesil , Caste by »ur,Post T. f.0Dl fv \< 1. State of Qihattisgarh, throu9h the Secretory, bepartment of womenAChild Devstopment &.K.S. ihawan, Roipur", (C,6.) 2. The Coilector, Kabirdh«an(Kwi-erdha) e Chw xecutive officer, Janpad lariya t>istt-Bilaspur (C.6.) 4. Th®Projeet Officer. Inte9rote< woman S Chitd Deveiopment Scheme Pandtriya, &istt- Kobirdham (Kcwepdha} (c.e.) 5. Sari Nersif^pur. Tahsil (Kaffen Kabirdh R\ ^w, >. Smt. Rekha Joiswa! W/o Shri Rdyendra JaiswaS, R/o Viliag® Nersinghpur Post &ullapur, P.5. & TAsil Pandoriya &istt Kabirdhan (Kowerdha) Present; Mr. Mirza Kaiaer Baeq, No. 1, 2 and 4. counsel for the peti+ioner. lei Lcmryer for ths State/ r (Passed on 16Tn t>ay of March, 2007) According to the tearned eounsel appearing for the petit!oner", the objeetion of the r-83pondent No. 6 with regord to appointment of the petitioner- on the ground that her father'-in-ltnu efected Panch of the Gr-an Panchayat Ner'singhpur, Ward No. 22 and as such, the petitioner' was disqudified is contrary to the fact. The father'-in-law of the petitioner hcs veslgned from the post of Panch of the Grwn P<mch»/atNersinghpur, Wwd No. 22 vide letter dated 30-1-2006 (.Annexur'e P/8), which was duly 2. Jhe appointment of the petitioner hod taken pface in November, Thus, objection raised by the respondent No. 6 wan not corr-ect. 3. B®that as jt rnefy', the Coltector, Kabirdham (Kawerdha) is directed to fook into al! the altegations made by the petitione!* and appropriate order in accordance with Aanqanbadi Schem®and !(»»within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thte order. TTie Impugned order dated 26.12.20)6 (Annexure P/l) Is quashed. 4. The writ petitlon is accordingly allowed to ttie above extent. No order as tu Consequentiy. J..A. No. 01/2007, on application for grant of inten'm retief sds dsspos^ •„ ,,,,,,SdA: sarisfiKAgn^^ 'e -^ Subhash