IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.387 of 2008 DR.RUDRA NARAYAN DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02/ 15-07-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned J.C. to A.A.G. 8 on behalf of the State. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2,3,4 and 5 in which it has been mentioned that on receipt of the processes issued by the court under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. the respondent nos. 4 and 5 went to execute the same to Lakshmi Niwas, Bengali Tola , P.S. Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga but on reaching there they came to know that the concerned property does not belong to the accused persons and on verifying the documents the Executing Officer noted down the report on the back of the processes and returned the same without execution. All these facts have been mentioned in Annexure- A series to the counter affidavit. In view of the facts mentioned in Annexure- A series to the counter affidavit, the petitioner does not want to press this writ application. He is permitted to withdraw the same. This application stands dismissed as withdrawn. S.Sb/- (Madhavendra Saran, J.)