THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 2542 of 2011. ORDER: This is plaintiff’s revision under Article 227 against the order dt. 29.11.2010 of the VI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam rejecting I.A.No. 1205 of 2010 in O.S.No. 89 of 2010. The aforesaid application who filed for a direction to the respondent/defendant to undergo DNA test along with his ‘original father’ Atchi Rami Reddy, to enable the revision petitioner to disprove the contention of the respondent/defendant that he is the son of late Suryanarayana though Smt. Chilla Ramayamma. According to the revision petitioner, the respondent/defendant was born to Achi Rami Reddy. The revision petitioner filed the suit for declaration of title and possession of the suit schedule property, which was resisted by the respondent/defendant claiming that the suit schedule property was purchased under a registered sale deed dt. 7.9.1936 by his father Suryanarayana and himself and ever since he has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. In rejecting the application, the court below recorded that disputed facts must be decided on oral and documentary evidence and there is no warrant for conduct of DNA test on the respondent. This Court discerns no error in the exercise of discretion or application of law by the court below, warranting revisional interference under Article 227. The revision is accordingly dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 21.10.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 2542 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 21.10.2011.