IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.20076 of 2010 SAMI ANSARI @ SAMMI ANSARI son of Rustam Ansari Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been stated that the present First Information Report was instituted about 3-1/2 months after the occurrence and from the facts of the case it appears to be a case of consent between two adults since the victim was opined to between 16-17 years of age. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No.266 of 2009, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii)That the petitioner shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance and in case he fails to do so, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge - 2 - and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)