SSESStiflBS HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR ?.P.(S( 0. -9 O / /2008 PBTITIONER ^•^y^>" .rfs"' ..••""' C.L. Dhakad, S/o. Shri B.P. Dhakad,aged about 45 years, Occupation- Assistant Engineer (Civil), Pendra Road, Water Resources Department, Division- Marwahi, Head -Quarter- Pendra Road, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) <^ RESPONDENTS 1. ^CE^^ CLERK10 ^.^^ '^^^e f'f'1''*.^0^^ -IK as^^yf^ ^Tsc^'^31 Union of India, Through: Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministiy of Personnel Public Grievances 8s Pensions, 3rd Floor Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi- 110001. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department Vallabh Bhavan, Secretariat Bhopal (M.P.). Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources Departruent, Sihava Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER k:^.: i^S^ff'^, HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR Writ Petition (Sl No. 901 of2008 Petitioner C. L. Dhakad Versus Respondenfcs Union oflndia& ofhers WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSnTUTION OF INDIA. (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri J.) •^§yf^K^SSie^ .-*S.•'f^a-s'^^^g^" Shri Siuul Otwaui, Advocate for the petltioner. Shri Abhishek Siaha, Advocate for fhe respondent No. l. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Depuly Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 2and4. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the respoudeat No.3. ORDBRfOralt (Passcd on fhis 8th day ofFebruaiy, 2010) Heard. The petttioner 6as fited this petition questiorung fhe legaMty aad vaUdily of the orders dated 11.12.2007 (Annexure P/l) aad 22,8.2005 (Annexure P/2), whereby the petitioner was duBcted to render his semces in tfae State of Madhya Pradesh. Leanied counsel appeanng for the respondent No.3 on fhe basis of fhe letter dated 30.5.2008 (Annexure R/1), annexed wifh fhe retum ffled on 22.7.2009, submits that fhe Union of todia, Personnel and Adiiunisteation Deparbnent, New DeBu, vide otd.er dated 5.3.2008 has reaUocated the petitioner to the State of Chhatdsgarh. In view of fhe above, accordiag to learued couasel appearu^; for fhe petitioner, nothiag survives in this petitfon for adjudicatmn. Accordingfy, fhis petition staads disposed of, as haviag bccoine infi-uctuous. No order as to costs. 3. 4. 'niaktir Sdi- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge