^ / 'a-s 7. IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C)NO. ?-, 3C^ / 2009 Petitioner /^ .y /• f^/€/ p/'^ / fr ' / ® (V' ^ <i y jS^ / •^ ^ Versus Respondents Shrikant Somawar, S/o Shri P.R.Somawar, Aged about 30 years, R/o .V^llqge - Uslapur Near Forest Check Post (Chowki), Tahsil - Takhatpur, Distt. Bilaspur-(C.6.) (Power of Attorney Holder of Smt. Vimal Wd/o Shri Baliram Chhatri) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Uchha Stariya Chhanbin Samiti, (In the matter of scrutiny of SC/ST Caste Certificate) through Its Secretary, Ravi Shankar Vishwavidyalaya Parisar, Raipur (C.£.) 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kota, Distt. Bilaspur-(C.£.) a. i^ ^<_7 'y WRITPETTTION UNDER ARTTCLES 226/227 OF THE CONSrCTUTCON OF INblA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS. DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. H Iffi'IBffiBIUdfel.MEs.m's.M- U^g*s?^j^^g^36B?B^ i\ mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION CC) No. 839 of2009 PETITIONER : Shrikant Somawar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UND_ER.ARTICLE_ 226/227 OFTHE.CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. °d Present: Shri A.S.Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Dy. A.G. with Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. G.A. and Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 06"' day of September, 2010) 1. Grievance of the petitioner, who is the power of attorney holder of' Smt. Vimla, is that the respondent No.2-High Power Caste Scnitiny Committee (for short "the Committee") has found that Smt. Vinila does not belong to scheduled caste category, vide order clateii 02.02.2009 (Annexure P/8). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointiy and fairly stibmit that this case is squarely covered by the decision ol' this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State pf Chhattisgarh & Others and other connected matters, wherein this Court after considering all the aspects of the matter and after considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in umpleen number of cases, in para 26 of the judgment and ordel' has made certain clarifications for verification ofthe caste certificate. 3. In view offoregoing; the writ petition is disposed of. The Comrnittce is directed to proceed in accordance with the decision of this Coiirl rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and other conneclcd matters. .. — —— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge |