wp4280­09.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4280 OF 2009 Shripati B. Powar & Ors ..Petitioner versus Vishwanath K. Topkar (deceased) By legal representatives Anant J. Topkar & Ors ..Respondents Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the petitioner. Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for respondent No.1. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P for respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 6th July 2011. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Patwardhan appearing for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order of the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune. Having perused it, I am of the opinion that the Additional Commissioner was in no error in reversing the order passed by the Additional Collector, Kolhapur on 15th October 2007. The proceedings are in relation to insertion of wp4280­09.doc 2 revenue entries. Therefore, it is not the province of the authorities to go into any other aspects including whether any of the party before it is a tenant protected by law, in so far as agricultural lands are concerned. In such circumstances and bearing in mind that the petitioner has a remedy in law to establish his right, title and interest in the property/land and the competent Court which he might approach having enough powers to decide the matter without being influenced by the observations and findings made in the impugned order, this is not a fit case for interference in the writ jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed in above terms. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)