SBS 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. ,/S) No. 4748 Qf2(XS Petitioner Respondents Versus s 1. 3. Kunjfal Sonwani, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Sftaram Sonwani, Patwari, P.C. No. 35, R,'o village and Post Nandkathi, Tahsit Uiamdha, Dtetri'ct Durg (C.G.). State of ChhaStisgarh, Through- ite Secretary, Department of Revenue, P.tentrateya, D.K.S. Bhswsn, Raipur (C.G.). Coitector, Durg, Dtetrict - Durg (C.S.) Sub DMsional OfRcer, Dhamdha, Distrirt Durg (C.G.). TahsiS IJUBIT BPTimiM I l*jr>PB ABTIftl P 1')Ktt')7 f^t: TMi liFiFr^l S r^llJWilli WlMW£.iTtSr^aiv»ii»i-.<,A%ff&*>*W'r1 nj SB^ Hon'bls Mf. Justico Ss^sh K. AcsnJhotri ^tfS. nvli wi^S ivil. wu'oU^s; <3<iy^ii s'^ .nyiiiitviii Shri Ashok Swamkar, Advocate for fte petitioner. Smt. Anju Wiuja, Deputy Goyt. Advocate for She rsspondents ORDER !C»1 ( Passed on this 16"' day ofApri!, 2007) a BH 4 T'i^d ?^<'S^W/<>?»^^?' l^-t^* ^L->^<1 ttt's^ fHtjf^W/'is^ /tf^<^t!^?^.wti^/^ <1^^ +fr^>?^^^>a?' ^tF^^.p i. iit^S f^viiitvifvi iiidi? iii^v* ii'ti^ ^KSUitWt l;H<,jiiS[iyiiiy iiiS i.iciiioici ViUd ^^*^/i i GL/f>t\'7 ^r^Si Shf \fl^ff£^ -nf l'h=£ Int'.&s'tew ^>i-i^a? ^sfi.'s.^ A O'5HHfi Uiai.c^ i0/^.v.*',^w0. Dy' ViiiUS? Vi istv iiii^Hiii yiUci ^<iiS?y £T.S?.^wO, passed by this Court, the petitioner is continuing aS the originai piace of posting. 2. Be that as it may, Vi's'th the passage of tirne Shis pefe'ticn has become infructuous as period of transfer is not appficabie forever. At this point of Sime there is no question to examine the valldity of the transfsr crder. Hov/ever, the respondents are at liberty So pass appropriate orders keeping in view She public tnterest and adminish'aStve exigency, •A'ittiout insisting on compiiancs of the impugned transfer order. 3. tn view of the above. this petstion stands disposed of. Nc order as to Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge