IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.695 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Order: 17.11.2009 Chetan Gupta ...Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Atul Nanda, Advocate with Ms. Rameeza Kakeem, Advocate and Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.K. Jain, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the respondents. 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR,J Shri Jain, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from Jaspal Singh, DSP (Vig.), states that investigation in case FIR No.28 dated 20.6.2008 registered under Sections 7,8,9,13(1)(D)(E),14 read with Section 120-B and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 at Police Station Vigilance Bureau at Patiala, is complete so far as the appellant is concerned. He, on instructions, further states that the presence of the appellant would not be required in the aforesaid FIR during further process of investigation. Shri Jain further states that no fresh case has been registered against the appellant. On the basis of the aforesaid statement, the appeal is rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. We make it clear that the appellant would be at liberty to approach this Court in case any such necessity arises. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE November 17, 2009 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE