IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7713/2010 Khaleeda Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 19.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Pankaj Gupta - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a divorcee lady having no issue. She is living only in a room. Civil suit is pending between the parties and an application under section 195 CrPC has been filed to which petitioner has already given reply. Petitioner undertakes not to transfer the property at any point of time rather she will live in the aforesaid one room during her life time only. Looking to the aforesaid undertaking and the fact that civil litigation is pending between the parties, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties, more specifically statement made by learned counsel for petitioner at the Bar, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Khaleeda may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 220/2010 registered at Police Station – Kotwali, Tonk for offence under Section/s 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for her appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma