IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2010 / 9TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 765 of 2010(U) ------------------------ PETITIONER: --------------- ANIL KUMAR, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O. CHELLPPAN, MANCHADIYIL, THEVARTHOTTAM, THADIKKAD.P.O, ANCHAL, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERL OF POLICE, (LAW AND ORDER), POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SUPERINTENDNET OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. SUDHEER, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANCHAL POLICE STATION, PUNALUR - KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 765 of 2010 U - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking a direction to the 5th respondent not to harass him and also for a direction to respondents 2 to 4 to take appropriate action on the complaint submitted by him before them. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he is a social worker attached to the S.N.D.P. Unit, Thevarthottam. According to him, the 5th respondent was harassing one Chandra Babu, who was illegally detained in the police station. This was questioned by the petitioner and on that day onwards the petitioner was harassed by the 5th respondent. Though the petitioner filed complaint before the superior officers, no action was taken so far. W.P.(C).No. 765 of 2010 2 3. A statement has been filed by the respondents, in which it is stated that the petitioner is actually wanted in other criminal cases. 4. Of course, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that all the cases are before Court and he is on bail in all the cases mentioned in the statement. 5. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. It will be open to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner, if so advised, in accordance with law in connection with any of the cases mentioned in the statement. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm