..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.441 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.140 OF 2008 Sou.Tai Aba Pawar. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.R.V.Bansode, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th June, 2008. DATED : 11th June, 2008. DATED : 11th June, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused No.3 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig. accused No.3 has been convicted under Sections 304B, 498-A & 504 read with 34 of IPC. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and she has not misused the liberty granted to her. The learned Counsel for the applicant ..(2).. further submitted that the applicant is a young married lady having two minor children. These statements have not been controverted by the prosecution. 4. The applicant is the maternal aunt of the husband of the deceased. The evidence on record shows that no specific role has been attributed to the present applicant and only vague and general allegations have been made by the witnesses. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant - Sou.Tai Aba Pawar be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)