IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26727 of 2009 1. JAG NARAIN RAI 2. JAGLAL RAI 3. BINDESHWAR RAI 4. TANESHWAR RAI 5. PANCHAM RAI -------- PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.8.2009 Heard Counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with U.T. Case No. 142 of 2008/ C.case No. 3439 of 2007 registered for offences under sections 323 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the petitioners’ Counsel that there is no allegation against the petitioners so far as section 436 of the Indian Penal Code is concerned. Specific allegation against Jagnarain Rai and Taneshwar Rai is that they took away a box containing Jwellary and money. So far as Jaglal Rai is concerned, no specific overt act has been alleged. On account of land dispute, a false case has been instituted. Considering these facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the above named petitioners is allowed. Let them surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial - 2 - Magistrate, Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with U.T. case No. 142 of 2008/ C. Case no. 3439 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mridula Mishra, J.) A.Kumar