IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20040 of 2002 RAJU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7. 19.8.2010. None appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls. After having perused the FIR and the seizure memo which appears as one of the Annexures to the FIR and the present petition also what the court finds is that all articles which were seized from the business premises of the petitioner were either decontrolled articles or were articles which were not scheduled as such in the Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984 as articles covered by that order. There was no necessity of putting up the display board at the business premises by any of the retailers or wholesalers. This is the basic flaw in the whole of the prosecution. Apart from this, there being no notification on classification of cities, there could not be any validity of an order fixing storage limit and as such there could not be any offence. The court believes that the reason was not to bring a culprit to justice, the reasons appears something otherwise for which the case was registered by the supply officer. The whole proceeding initiated by order dated 26.7.1999 in Kadam Kuan P.S.Case No.570 - 2 - of 1998 stands quashed. The petition is allowed. Let the L.C.R. be sent back to the concerned court immediately. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )