IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2111 of 2010 1. KALAM NATH RAI, Son of Hikayit Rai, Resident of village and P.O. – Tejpurwa, P.S. – Marhaura, District – Saran at Chapra. 2. Chandrika Rai, Son of Ram Bilash Rai, Resident of village and P.O. Tejpurwa, P.S. – Marhaura, District – Saran at Chapra. .................... Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sri B.M. Agrawal, Son of not known to the petitioners, Presently posted as Chief Engineer, Rural Electrification, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. 3. Sri Shyam Sundar Prasad Srivastava, Son of not known to the petitioners, Presently posted as Superintending Engineer, Saran Area Electricity Board, Chapra. ............... Contemnors – Opposite parties ----------- 04/ 21.01.2011 The present M.J.C. application has been filed alleging for non-compliance of the order dated 23.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 16054 of 2009 wherein the Court has directed the petitioners to file a representation before the Chief Engineer (Rural Electrification), Bihar State Electricity Board and the Superintending Engineer, Saran Area Electricity Board, Chapra with their grievance. It is contended that the representation has been made but no orders have been passed considering the representation and the matter has come up for hearing. Learned counsel for the respondents have filed a second supplementary show cause on behalf of the opposite party-Board intimating this Court that the orders of this Court has been complied with vide Annexure - C/1 dated 2 31.12.2010 wherein it has been stated that the transmitters have been erected and wiring has been done and electricity would be supplied to the villagers who have deposited the concerned deposits. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order has not been fully complied with and it is only partially complied. Taking note of the submissions made by the parties, we are of the opinion that it would suffice to comply the order of this Court in full even for villagers who deposit the money. The learned counsel on behalf of the Board has contended that the matter here is proceeding in a very speedy manner. We are of the opinion, that the authority should comply the direction given by this Court even in full. With the above observations this M.J.C. application is closed. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to file a fresh M.J.C. in case of non-compliance of the order. S.A./Kundan (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.)