IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1529 of 2008 SADAN PRASAD & ANR Versus RAMADHAR SINGH ----------- 4/ 27-08-2008 This petition has been filed for restoration of S.A.No.41 of 1996 which stood dismissed for default against appellant No.1 due to late compliance of order of this Court dated 22.06.2006 by which one week’s time was allowed to the appellants to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the proposed heirs of deceased appellant No. 1 and to serve a copy of I.A.No.1097 of 2005 on the other side . Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that copy of aforesaid interlocutory application was served within the period allowed by this Court but the Vakalatnama could not be filed within the time allowed by this Court and could be filed only after expiry of the time granted by this Court on 26.03.2008, From the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the petition it appears that genuine reasons have been shown due to which the petitioners could not comply the said order within the time allowed by this Court. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and S.A.No.41 of 1996 is restored with respect to appellant No.1. Office is directed to place the aforesaid I.A. No.1097 of 2005 under the heading for orders on petition, as Vakalatnama has already been filed. B.Tiwary/ (S.N Hussain,J)