IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2005 MR. SANTOSH SAVLO KOTHAWALE ALIAS ....Applicant NAIK Versus MR.HARISHCHANDRA SAVLO KOTHAWALE ....Respondents AND 4 ORS., Ms. G. Kale, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri D.V. Patkar, Advocate for the Respondents No.1, 2 and 5. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 9th March, 2006 P.C.: By this application, the applicant seeks deletion of Respondent No.3 who has already expired. Mr. Patkar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.1, 2 and 5 has no objection if the application is allowed. Accordingly the application is allowed. Respondent No.3 is permitted to be deleted from the cause title, subject to the legal consequences that may follow. Amendment to the cause title to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. sl.