•^^ ^ IN THE HIGH CQURT QF CHHATTIS6ARH^TBILASPU^ WRIT PETETCON (S) NO..M.t'^'../2010 PETITIONERSS ^ 1 Zf/ A°/y-(v' ^i^ 0>/W ^W'-y o'/'-y >•' ^".^ ^" RESPONDENTS ^ -1. Namita Sahu, Son crf late Kishori Lal Sahu, aged about 24 years, at present working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Naveen Primary School, Chhati, Block Dhamtari (C.G.), Smt. Menka Goutam, b/o. Late Dwarika Ram Ramteke, aged about 35 years, at present working as a Shiksha Karmi, 6rade-III, Govt. Pn'mary School, Chhati, bistricl Dhamtari (G.e.), Kailash Prasad Sahu, Son of late Mahavir Prasad Sahu, aged about 28 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Govt. Naveen Primary School, Puri, Tahsil and Districl Dhamtari (C.6.), VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through -the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 'III' ^b / 2. The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^' 3. bistrict Education Officer, Dhamtari, Distt.-bhamtari (C.G.) ^"4. The Cotlector, Dhamtari, District bhamtari (C.G.) / 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, bhamtari, Oistrict Dhamtari (C.6.), WRITPETCTCON UNDER ARTECLE2260F THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. K'—^S 3ff^?T "^T t^Ni ^f8TT STT^T'SWNr s' '3w[ *<iitiKnq, ®fl|<H'i<o,fs«'iiyli,< ^....h^..Cs.^MA^/.k <4Wrtt **11eh"""~"'"""'~'""""'""""""7""^ 200 SIT^T 'q^q? (lcltd<!<<'EI) TRTWHftg 311^1 SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra B 18.8.2010 copy. Mr. R. S. Patel, counse Mrs. Sangeeta Mishra, Heard on admission. The petitioners have fil are ward of Assistant Teacher! in service. They moved an and they have been given ap] Grade III. The petitioners appointed as Assistant Teachelrs Learned State counsel petitioners may be given representation before the be considered on its own meri Having considered and| merits of the case, in the served, if a direction is givej representation raising thej respondent authority along wji wifhin six weeks from today,| the competent respondent aujt chi<it<'i4if tffR^ff ^f 'felst' <n>i^i< ^sfflmsn^r ohan Shrivastava. J. for the petitioners. Panel Lawyer for the State, on advance ^d this petition on the ground that they 1/Upper Division Teachei? who died while apjilication for compassionate appointment lointment on the post of Shiksha Karmi l.ibmitted that they are entided to be according to the policy. submitted that for the present, the ^n opportunity of filing the detailed corrjpetent respondent authority, which may i, in accordance with law. without expressing any opinion on the opufiion of this Court, ends of justice will be to the petitioners to make a detailed grievances before the competent ith a copy of the petition and this order, and on such representation being filed, Aiority shall decide fhe saine on its own r :":s.siSt'h-ir'Utl ^r :a-HC—7S 's^t •*{w\''i<i, wv\wi6, F^cfwy. *1I*i^T <*>*<ieb Wl, 200 StI^T 'V^V ('yf^'^I) sn^i ^i fi;-fi«ti ^TT 3?T^?T^?* TOirere^fei 3)i^i -^ <tif<)^tftTT/Wflyff ^f^^ <f^-^,l< ^sifiiiisn^r '*«--1 >.<! merits, in accordance with law, period of four raonths from thc any grievance still remains, '*"^a.wu 'M.sa»s -e fcg^^s^^y Ae law. ii"~ —•'— &»9tXMSldH •""- 'Wtfctbe.aforesaid obsen Certified copy as per rule| ^ n '^ Praveen as early as possible, preferably within a date of receipt of the representation. If |;he petitioners may avail the reinedy lation, this petition stands disposed off. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava -^ , Judge