1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 291 OF 2009 Raosaheb Govindrao Patil .. APPELLANT VERSUS Assistant Charity Commissioner Osmanabad & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Arun Dalal, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. B.L. Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for respondent nos. 2, 8, 11, 16, 17 and 21. Mr. Ravindra Nirmal, Advocate for respondent nos. 3, 4, 6 and 10. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 8 th January, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Grievance of the appellant in this appeal is in respect of order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Osmanabad region, Osmanabad on 15-6-2001 appointing the board of trustees of 15 members to run the affairs of the trust for the period of six months. The part of the order so far as it relates to framing of scheme is not subjected to challenge by the appellant. The initial appointment of the board of trustees by virtue of order dt. 15-6-2001 has come to an end after lapse of period of six months. 2 The question raised in the matter touching the legality of the order therefore is rendered merely academic. The appellant contends that he has grievance in respect of certain acts committed by the board including the act of enrollment of new members and confirming membership on certain members during its tenure of office. The appellant shall have liberty to raise grievance before appropriate forum provided under law and if such a grievance is made, the prescribed forum would be entitled to look into all the contentions those would be raised by the appellant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no interference is called for in the instant second appeal. Appeal does not involve any substantial question of law. Appeal therefore stands dismissed summarily. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/sa291.09.odt