IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13732 of 2009(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- G.VIGI, NO.963510639 CONSTABLE, B COY, CISF UNIT, CPT COCHI. BY ADV. MR.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE COMMANDANT, CISF UNIT, CPT, COCHIN. 2. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, CISF SOUTH ZONE, RAJAJI BHAVAN, CHENNAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, CISF SOUTH SECTOR HQR, CHENNAI PORT TRUST COMPLEX, CHEENAI-9. 4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CISF HEAD QUARTERS CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI. R1 TO R4 BY ADV.MR.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.S.G. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P.(C) No. 13732 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The main dispute raised in this writ petition relates to the permission sought by the petitioner to reside outside the barracks. By Annexure R1(a) order dated 07-05-2009 the said request has been granted for a period of three months with effect from 07-05- 2009. Therefore, the main grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 2. The petitioner, however, requests that he may be allotted a quarter in the barracks on medical grounds. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that as the petitioner is due for transfer within a month, he cannot be allotted a quarter in Cochin. 3. In the light of the fact that the petitioner is due for transfer, I am of the opinion that the petitioner cannot claim that he should be allotted a quarter within the barracks in Cochin. Within the period of three months referred to Annexure R1(a) order, the petitioner will be transferred out of Cochin. That being the situation, the said request W.P.(C) 13732/09 -2- cannot be entertained. The writ petition has, in my opinion, become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly closed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. mn.