IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2800 of 2010 1.TUNTUN SINGH son of Nagendra Singh 2.Awdhesh Kumar Singh son of late Vasudeo Singh 3.Raghubansh Singh son of late Satyanarayan Singh, all resident of village Reva, P.S. Saraiya, Dist. Muzaffarpur 4.Basant Singh son of Gorakh Singh 5.Arun Singh son of Gorakh Singh 6Sachitanand Singh @ Suman Singh son of Chandrika Singh, all r/o village Rathor Tola, Reva, P.S. Saraiya,Dist. Muzaffarpur 7.Rajeshwar Singh son of late Sagar Singh, r/o village lathawa Tola P.S. Saraiya, Dist. Muzaffarpur …..Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Saraiya P.S. case No. 55 of 2006, dated 28.2.2006 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 181, 188, 323, 332, 333, 353, 337, 338, 307, 427, 114 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that according to the prosecution case on account of an accident, a motorcyclist had died, as a result thereof large number of villagers are said to have assembled there and they all were protesting about the said death. Petitioners are said to be members of the mob. The allegation of pelting stone causing injury to a police Havaldar is only against co-accused Bhanu Singh , Arvind Singh and Santosh Kumar Singh and there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. Learned counsel for the State points out that petitioners are absconding for a long time and certain strict conditions should be put against them if the court is inclined to accede to their prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. - 2 - Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of .S.D.J.M, West , Muzaffarpur in the above noted case, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further subject to the conditions (1 ) that one of the bailors must be Govt. servant or close family member of the petitioners who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioners, and (2) the petitioners shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing themselves in person or through representation by their lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioners fail to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman