HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Writ Petition No. 2322 of 2003 Petitioner Versus 1. Santosh Bafham, son of Shri Daulatt-am. Bafham, aged about 31 jears, presently posted as peon, C, G. Couiicil of Science and Technology, Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla Uaiversity Campus, Raipiir, District- Raipur, (C.G) C.G. CouncitofScienceand Tectuiology, fhrough its Dircctor General, Pandit Ravi Shankar ShuKla University Caiupus, RaipTU-, (Chhattisgarh) M.P. Coiuicil of Science and Technology, tttrough its Director Greiieral, Kisan. Bhawan, 26, Arera Hffls, Mofher Teressa Road, Bhopal, (M.P.) State of Chliattisgarh, through Secretary, Deparfcaient of Science and Technology, D.K.S. Building, Maatralay, Raipur, (C.G) State of Madhya Piadesh, through Secretaiy, Departaient of Science aad Technolog5r, Vallabh Bhawau, Mantralay, BhopaJ, (M.P.) Shri B.D. Guru, counsel for die petitioner. Shri Paukaj Shrivastava, paael lawyer for respondent No. 3. Shri Ainit Venna, counsel for respondent No. 1, None for respondent No. 2 ao.d 4. ORAL O RD E R ( 7th February, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat petitioner be graD.ted liberty to make a representation to fhe ite ls!> rfl^ s". se respondents/aufhorities for cousidering his case for atlocatioii to tlie State of M.P., to which leamed coiinsel appearing for the respecth'e respondents have no objection. 2, In view of the foregoing, the petitioner is granted liberty to niake a representation before the concemed authorities. The concemed authorities are accordinglir directed to consider aad decide the -^ „^^-^^ —-^^-^ represeatation, if any, aad to pass order in accoixlance with law, withiu. a period ofeight weeks fi'oin the date ofreceipt ofrepicsentation, 3. Inview offoregoing, petition stands disposed of .— -- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge