HE COURT OF CHHATTgSGARH AT 85L SPUR Wr§t Pet't66n Na. 3404 0f 2004 Pra$ham Kumar Dewangan, Sic DR. Dewangan, Aged about 30 years, R/o V§dyut Nagar Q.No.-293. Eane No.5. Durg, Tehsii and Dist. Burg. (C.G.). Versus Respondents 1. sate sf Chhat€isgarh, through secretary, office situated at -— Secretariate. Raipur, {63.}. 2. Central Government, through Chief Secretary, ems-e situated at - secretariate Ne r—Delhi. 3. State sf Madhya Pradesh, thraugh Chief Secretary. office — situated at secretariate Bhcpal, (M.P.). 4. Superitendant Engineer, $hivnath circle, Burg. Office situated at Durg (C.G.). Executive Engineer, Shivnath circie, Burg, cffrce situated at —Durg (6.6.). 6. Chief Engineer, Mahanadi. Godaveri kachar, Jet-sansadhan Vibhag, Raigur, attice situated at Raipur — (CG). '7. Coliector, Durg. office — situated at Dutg (0.6.). DnHi-in 1 vuuvriar 01 WRBT PETI'FQIN UNDER ARTt$LE 225t227 OF THE C‘éNSTiTUTiéN OF [NWA Singte Bench :Hcn’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnthettt, J. 8hri M. S. Dhurandhar, Advocate tar the petitioner. Smt. Binu 8harma, Panei Lawyer for the respondents. .1 ORAL ORDER (Passed’on this 14‘“ day of February, 2008) ;_ Learned counset appearing fer the petitioner. on instructions. eubmits that with the passage of time the oetition Fias become infructuous a3 the rettef prayed for in this petttton has already been granted by the respondents. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no opposition. 3. tn View oi the above. the petition is dismissed as having become infractuous. No order asto costs. /| Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotn‘ > Judge Thakur