IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No.M-4682 of 2008 Date of decision : 4.2.2009. ... Pardeep Kumar ................ Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh.Amardeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Sh. D.K. Singal, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4- complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 266 dated 18.5.2004 under Section 420, 120-B IPC registered at police Station Sector 5, Panchkula. In this case State Bank of India, Branch Office Sector 16, Panchkula is the complainant. Reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent – bank. Counsel for the respondent – bank has stated that he has no objection to the quashing of FIR qua the petitioner as the amount has been deposited. Otherwise also, petitioner was only a guarantor and the allegation in the petition is that original owner has previously mortgaged the property in favour of another bank. Crl.M. No.M-4682 of 2008 -2- So, in these circumstances, the FIR referred to above, qua petitioner stands quashed. Further proceedings, in pursuant to that FIR qua petitioner, also stand quashed. ( K.C. Puri ) 4.2.2009. Judge