THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.25236 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners claim to be the absolute owners and possessors of the subject lands situated in Suryapet Revenue Village, having purchased the same through registered sale deed. While so, it is their case that the third respondent filed an appeal under Section 5(B) of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’) questioning the action of the Mandal Revenue officer, Suryapet in issuing 13-B Certificate in favour of the fourth respondent, who is the vendor’s vendor of the petitioner, and the Appellate Authority and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Suryapet, the second respondent herein, vide proceedings, dated 18.06.2009, allowed the appeal canceling the 13-B Certificate issued in favour of the fourth respondent. Subsequently, as there were typographical errors, the same were corrected and amended orders were issued vide proceedings, dated 10.08.2009. While so, the petitioners state that questioning the impugned proceedings, they have already filed a revision before the fifth respondent, namely, the Joint Collector, Nalgonda District, along with an application seeking stay. Their grievance is that so far no orders have been passed by the fifth respondent either in the revision or in the application seeking stay. Hence, the present writ petition. This Court, while issuing notice before admission, on 20.11.2009, passed the following interim order: “Status quo obtaining as on today, as to the entries in the revenue records in respect of the subject land, shall be maintained. However, it is made clear that revisional authority may proceed with the matter as per law.” Seeking to vacate the interim orders granted by this Court, dated 20.11.2009, the third respondent filed W.V.M.P.No.76 of 2010 along with counter affidavit denying the allegations made by the petitioner. Be that as it may, during the course of hearing, it is represented that the revision preferred by the petitioners is still pending before the fifth respondent. Since the statutory revision is still pending, the learned counsel appearing for both the parties submitted that let there be a direction to the revisional authority to consider and dispose of the revision expeditiously. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the fifth respondent- revisional authority to consider and dispose of the revision preferred by the petitioners against the impugned proceedings expeditiously, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the interim orders of status quo granted by this Court shall continue. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date:26.04.2010 VGB