THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10718 of 2007 Date:04.08.2011 Between: Sai Priya Enclave Flat Owners Welfare Association, Hyderabad reptd by Its President Sri S.Ramakrishna ..... Petitioner AND The Commissioner, Quthbullapur Municipality, Ranga Reddy District And two others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri N.Rama Rao For Sri C.Ramachandra Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri R.Radha Krishna Reddy, Standing Counsel for GHMC Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Sri K.Chidambaram The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner, which is Sai Priya Enclave Owners Welfare Association, is that respondent No.1 having issued notice, dated 13.04.2007, to the two Cellular towers and respondent No.2 has failed to take further action in pursuance thereof. Respondent No.2 who claims to be the owner of the site and builder of the apartment got himself impleaded in the writ petition. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Commissioner of respondent No.1, which has since got merged in Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, it is inter alia stated that in response to the notice, dated 13.04.2007, a reply notice was given by respondent No.2 and he enclosed an affidavit-cum-undertaking of the flat owners declaring no objection to install Airtel tower and that the flat owners shall not raise any objection, litigation, dispute or claim in respect thereof. It is, therefore, stated that no further action was taken in pursuance of the said notice, dated 13.04.2007. In my opinion, respondent No.1 having issued notice, dated 13.04.2007, has to bring the same to its logical end. If he was satisfied that no further action need be taken on the said notice, he should have passed an appropriate order in this regard. As no such order has been passed, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, in which respondent No.1 has got merged, to pass appropriate orders on notice, dated 13.04.2007 and communicate the same to the petitioner and respondent No.2 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.13471 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 04th August, 2011 DR