FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5069 OF 1990 --------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office : Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions : & Registrar’s orders. : . --------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.M. Mhamane for the petitioner. Mr. Nitin Jamdar for respondents 1(d) and 1(e). CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2005. 18TH JANUARY, 2005. 18TH JANUARY, 2005. P.C.:- The present writ petition is placed before me for speaking to the minutes of order dated 30/6/2004 passed by Justice D.G. Karnik. Ordinarily, it should go before the same learned judge. However, the learned counsel for the parties are only seeking that the full title of the writ petition be shown in the judgment. Mr. Mhamane, the learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to this. In the circumstances, I see no reason why this request should not be granted. Hence, office is directed to show the full title of Writ Petition No.5069 of 1990 in the judgment dated 30/6/2004 passed by Justice D.G. Karnik. The learned counsel for the respondents states that he has filed special leave petition in the Supreme Court but because of this incomplete title in the judgment, the office of the Supreme Court is not accepting the special leave petition. In view of this, the office is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)