IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 181 of 2007 (S/B) (old no. 5531 of 1996) Hira Singh Bhandari …… Petitioner Versus State Public Services Tribunal and others ……. Respondents Mr. Lalit Samant, Advocate on behalf of Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the respondents. Coram : Hon’ble J.C.S.Rawat,J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Lalit Samant, Advocate on behalf of Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the respondents. 2. Mr. Lalit Samant, the learned counsel for he petitioner submits that the writ petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and the writ petition has now become infructuous. 3. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Dharma Veer, J.) (J.C.S.Rawat, J.) 29.11.2007 29.11.2007 Shiv