IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.22177 of 2001 Between: Sunchula Thirupathi S/o Komaraiah Kondurupaka Village, Sultanabad Mandal, Karimnagar Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police, Sultanabad,Karimnagar. 3 Sunchula Purushotham S/o Mallesham Karimanagr. 4 Sunchula Hemalatha S/o Mallesham Kodurupaka Village Sultanabad Manda,Karimanagr. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus i) declaring the action of the R1 & 2 in coercing the petitioner and his brothers to give properties to the R3 & R4 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art 14, 21 & 300A of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.22177 of 2001 ORDER: Petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in coercing the petitioner and his brothers to give properties to respondent Nos.3 and 4, who are the son and wife of the eldest brother of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. A counter has been filed stating that the 4th respondent made a representation before the 1st respondent alleging that her husband was killed by naxalites and she has no source of income and the petitioner and others are not giving her share in the joint family property left over by her father-in- law. In that connection only, an enquiry has been made and after coming to know that the matter is civil in nature, the 2nd respondent advised the petitioner and the complainant to approach appropriate court of law to seek redressal of their grievance. It is stated that the police never made any attempt to settle the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. In view of the categorical denial of all the allegations, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 02-04-2008 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VEENA}