IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.880 of 2008 Between: M.Rajamma and others … Petitioners And The State of A.P., and another … Respondents This Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.880 of 2008 ORDER: - The complaint allegations clearly discloses that A1 and A3 caught hold of the hair of the complainant, dragged her and beat her and all the accused went to the house of the complainant in the absence of her husband and beat her with hands all over the body and kicked her with legs, due to which she sustained bodily pains and injury and the incident was taken place in the presence of L.Ws.1 and 2. When the complaint allegations clearly discloses about the assault made on the de facto complainant, she should be given an opportuni8ty to prove the complaint allegations by leading evidence. Therefore, the same cannot be quashed only on the ground that the 1st petitioner also lodged a complaint in C.C.No.19 of 2006 against the 2nd respondent, her husband and others for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 352 and 504 of IPC. Having regard to the same, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 1st July 2010 lmv