THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.2017 of 2010 DATE:03.02.2010 Between: Hameedunnisa Begum .... Petitioner and The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, having office at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and others .... Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.2017 of 2010 ORDER: According to the petitioner, she is the lawful owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.39.00 guntas in Sy.No.57 of Hashmathpet village, Balanagar Mandal, R.R. District. The Government filed L.G.C.No.104 of 1989 before the Special Court under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition Act, Hyderabad, seeking to evict her from the said land, and the Special Court, by an order dated 05.02.2007, allowed the same. Challenging the said order, she filed W.P.No.4692 of 2007 before this Court along with a stay petition in W.P.M.P.No.5983 of 2007 and this Court was pleased to grant stay of order of the Special Court, by an order dated 08.03.2007. It is also stated that prior to the writ petition, she filed a suit in O.S.No.61 of 2001 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy, for injunction against the revenue authorities and others and the said suit was dismissed. Being aggrieved by the same, she filed an appeal in A.S.(S.R.)No.18767 of 2005 before this Court and this Court, by an order dated 28.10.2005, directed both the parties to maintain status-quo in A.S.M.P.No.2206/2005. Taking advantage of the litigation pending since a long time between her and the Government, on 16.01.2010 some anti-social elements tried to encroach into her land and threatened her with dire consequences. Immediately, she gave a detailed complaint to the 3rd respondent, but he refused to receive the same on the ground that the matter is civil in nature. Hence, she made a representation to the 2nd respondent on 18.01.2010 seeking to provide police protection. But however, as no orders have yet been passed, she approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home. 3. Having considered the submissions made by both the counsel and as it is the main grievance of the petitioner though she gave a representation dated 18.01.2010 to the 2nd respondent narrating the above factual matrix, he has not passed any order so far, the 2nd respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18.01.2010 and pass necessary orders thereon, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 3rd February, 2010 cbs THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.2017 of 2010 (Disposed of) 3rd February, 2010 cbs