IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9698 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOHN V. ANTONY, S/O. ANTONY, AGED 53 YEARS, VALIYATHAYIL HOUSE, POTTA.P.O, CHALAKKUDY, TRICHUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.X.SHAM JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, CHALAKKUDY MUNICIPALITY, CHALAKKUDI, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI. JAMES, S/O. KOHAPPAN, PROPRIETOR, M/S. F.R. FURNITURE, KCK CONSTRUCTIONS, KOOTTATY HOUSE, POTT.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THRISSURT DISTRICT POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR FOR R1 SC SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).9698/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent Municipality on Ext.P5 communication received from the Environmental Engineer of the Kerala State Pollution Control Board. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Municipality informs that on receipt of Ext.P5, licence issued to the 2nd respondent was cancelled and that KSEB has also been asked to disconnect the supply. Learned Standing Counsel for the Pollution Control Board also submits that they have issued a stop memo. It is thus evident that the complaint of the petitioner that there is inaction on the part of the 1st respondent, is incorrect. Recording the submission as above, writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs