1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1103 OF 2005 C.L.Nair & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. The Security Guards Board & Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr.I.S.Thakur for the Petitioners. Mrs.Lund with Ms.Lata Desai i/b Ms.Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.1. Mr.N.R.Patankar with Mr.V.P.Sawant for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : A.P.SHAH & A.P.SHAH & A.P.SHAH & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. 8th August, 2005. P.C. : 1. Respondent No.3 is absent, despite service. 2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The issue involved in this Petition is 2 covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.1538 of 2001 (Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi V. Security Guards Board for Gr. Bombay and Thane and Ors., decided on 5th February, 2005). 3. Mr.Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the concerned security guards will apply to the Board for registration within two weeks from today. The Board shall decide the application within four weeks from the date of receipt thereof and allot the security guards as far as possible to the establishment of Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 is already registered under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Scheme, 1981 as amended by Notification dated 1st November, 2002. 4. The present security guards shall be continued till appropriate decision is taken by the Board. 5. The Petition stands disposed of.