1 abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2135 OF 2008 Sabhajit Prayag Yadav .. Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Saluja, A.G.P. For respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 19th APRIL 2010 P.C. : 1. None present for the petitioner. Heard learned A.G.P. for the respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. Perused the affidavit filed by Mr. Dinesh Kurhade, Naib Tahsildar (Recovery). From the affidavit, it is clear that no further steps can be taken for recovery of the money in pursuance of the recovery certificate as the property in question does not belong to the respondent no.3 and there are no details of any other property of the respondent no.3. Hence, it cannot be said that the respondent no.3 has 2 committed breach of the order of the Court. The contempt petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)