IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.29236 of 2010 1. RAM MANI SINGH 2. Hari Om @ Fantush Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8/ 13.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Complainant’s case is that tractor in question was sold to the petitioner for an amount of Rs. 4,51,000/- but its price was not paid rather was agreed to be paid later after testing the tractor. That was never paid and complainant bound to withdraw his tractor from petitioners’ possession but that was possible only after near about two and half years of the sell, while on the other hand submission of the petitioner is that a meager amount was only to be paid. So, no paper was issued in his favour and due to pathetic condition of farmers that could not be paid, but now after taking in possession of the tractor, payment is not possible. The controversy in between the parties needs a decision after appearing evidence in the case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 63 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sheikhpura subject to the conditions 2 as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)