IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46381 of 2009 ARUN MEHTA @ ARUN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 29.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is an employee of the Finance Company, concerned authorities of which have already been allowed anticipatory bail but petitioner could not appear in the case due to having no knowledge of filing of the case, as he joined job in another Company, while the investigation was conducted in the case. Even then petitioner is apprehending his arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 74 of 1997, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., District 2 Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)