THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5153 of 2009 AND CRIMINAL PETITION (SR) No.19431 of 2010 AND CRLPMP No.5322 & CRLPMP(SR)No.19434 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: Petitioners-A1 and A2 in Crl.P.No.5153 2009 and the Petitioner-A3 in Crl.P.(SR) No.19431 of 2010 seek quashing of the proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.198 of 2007 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of I.P.C. Today, when these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is settled out of Court and that the parties are present before the Court. In the light of the said submission, this Court questioned the 2nd respondent herein and she stated that in the light of the cancellation deed of agreement of sale cum GPA with possession executed by petitioners-A1 and A2 in her favour, she is no more interested in getting the matter prosecuted and that she has no objection if the proceedings initiated against the petitioners-A1 to A3 are quashed. The contents of the compromise petition are as follows: “The petitioners submit that in the interest of both families of 2nd respondent and the petitioners herein, the elders mediated into the matter and the matter has been settled between them and that they continue to live peacefully forgetting the unfortunate developments and that they have amicably settled the matter out of Court. Deshagoni Hari Krishna Goud and V.Anil Kumar Goud (Petitioners-A1 and A2) executed Cancellation Deed of Agreement of Sale cum GPA with possession in favour of the 2nd respondent herein on 14.06.2010 vide document No.886 of 2010. The petitioners submit that the 2nd respondent herein having compromised with the petitioners is not desirous of pursuing any further action against the petitioners, as stated by her originally in her First Information Report lodged on 27.07.2006.” In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties and also in view of the cancellation deed of agreement of sale cum GPA with possession executed by the petitioners-A1 and A2 in favour of the 2nd respondent, this Court is of the view that that the proceedings initiated against the petitioners-A1 to A3 herein need not be continued. The Criminal Petitions as well as the Crl.M.Ps are accordingly allowed and the proceedings initiated against the petitioners-A1 to A3 in C.C.No.198 of 2007 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed. ____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 25-06-2010 Gsn.