IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3798 of 2009 1.DEEPAK KUMAR SINHA, SON OF LATE GRIDHAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KASHIPUR, WARD NO. 4, P.S. &P.O, SAMASTIPUR, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. 2.RAM PREET MAHATO, SONE OF LATE JADDU MAHATO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DAULATPUR, P.S. WARISNAGAR, P.O. SHEKHOPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. …………PETITIONERS. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.SRI VIJAY PRAKASH, THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3.SRI BAIDYA NATH PRASAD, THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4.SRI ANIRUDH PRASAD SINGH, THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA PARISHAD, SAMASTIPUR. ……………RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 4/ 12.01.2011 Having heard Mr. S.R Saran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K Singh, learned counsel for Zila Parisad, this Court would find that now when the authority has passed the order dated 26.11.2010 giving reasons for not regularizing the services of the petitioner, any further judicial review of the said order will not be permissible within the limited scope of the contempt jurisdiction. That being so, Mr. Saran, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to withdraw this contempt 2 application with a liberty to assail the order dated 26.11.2010 (Annexure-D to the supplementary show cause) before an appropriate forum. With the aforementioned observation, this contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)