THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.15905 of 2005 29.07.2005 BETWEEN 1. Ainampudi Umapathy S/o Satyanarayana, aged about 48 years, Occ:Business, r/o 8-4-368/G/45,Gouthampuri Colony, Erragadda, Hyderabad and another. PETITIONERS AND 1. The Divisional Co-operative Officer, Secunderabad Division, Gruhakalpa Building, Mukhramjahi Road, Hyderabad and another. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.15905 of 2005 ORDER: -- Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and with their consent, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent refused to register the sale certificate issued by the first respondent vide proceedings dated 09-06-2005 in E.P.No.21 of 2005-J1 (A) while confirming the sale of Open Plot in H.NO.12-2-460/2 admeasuring 372 square yards situated at Jeevan Kalyan Nagar, Gudimalkapur, Mehidipatnam, Hyderabad. The sale of the said immovable property relates to one Sri S. Bastawala, which was knocked down 09-05-2005 in favour of the petitioners herein, being the highest bidders for Rs.15,60,000/-. The purchase money was remitted by the auction purchasers and all the formalities required under the Rules were observed by the Assistant Registrar-cum-Sale Officer before conducting the sale. Pursuant thereto the first respondent passed the order confirming the sale of the said immovable property by proceedings dated 09-06-2005. The first respondent, vide proceedings dated 10-06-2005, while enclosing a certificate of sale under Rules 52 (14) (iii) of A.P. Co-operative Societies Rules for sale of immovable property belonging to Sri S. Bastavala, authorized the Assisant Registrar/Sales Officer for execution of registration as the first respondent was exempted from personal appearance under Section 88(1) of the Registration Act. While enclosing a copy of the sale certificate, the second respondent was requested to file a case in Book No.1 sale confirmation relating to the immovable properties and intimate the same to the office of the first respondent. 3. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that since the petitioner did not make payment of the requisite stamp duty, the document was not registered. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the requisite stamp duty and registration charges. 5. The writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to inform the petitioner, of the stamp duty and registration charges payable by him, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on payment of the necessary stamp duty and registration charges, the second respondent shall take necessary steps, in accordance with law, for registering the document. ______________________________ JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN Dt.29-07-2005 Note: Issue CC by Wednesday. B/0 GLV