^ (O^ -p. ^•" IN THE HONOURABLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COl^RT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No.. 1W _/ 2001. PETITIONER: Versus ^/S'anand Das Diwan S/o La.te Pirtu Das Diwan, aged about 34 years, Profession: Joumalist, R/o Near Rani Mahal Ra.ni road, Pura.ni Basti, Korba, P.S., P.0., Tahsil & Dist: Korba, Chhatrisgarh. ) RESPONDENTS: 01. Election commission of India, Govt of In^iia, .^ Nin^achan Sadan, New Delhi. . .^ ^^:- ,,<y:^-" .^^y ,..< '2. Chief Election Authority, State of Chhattisggrh, DJCS. Bh'awan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 03. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Mungeli N^ka, Bilaspur, Dist: Bilaspur, Chhatdsgarh. 04. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Korba (earlier Special Area Development Authority^ Korba), Saket Bhawan, ITI Chowk, Korba, Tah & Dist: Korba, Chhattisgarh. 05, Banw^ari Lal Agrawal S/o Shridhar Agrawal, a^ed about 50 years, R/o Durpa Road, Korba, Talisi^ & District: Korba, Chhattisg-arh. [Ex-Chairman, Special Area Development Autliority, Korba* Presently M.L.A. (Katghora assembly seat) & Deputy Speaker, State Legislative Assembly, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Writ Petition under article 226 of the constitution of India, XI-HC-22 B"^ ';^PT[^1^, ^TFf^, f^lRTy W.P.NO.1159/2001 '^ 200- ^i^r^T f^Tf^ W^I 'i^iwmi'^ ^¥FI^TW^fN anotllier a4@ 4/10/2001 Heard Shri Ra^eaiaal S; petitionerand Shri Rajeev respondent/State» The grievance of the lighted in a representation tioa Autbority of the State It is also sfated that ^AI@dibe&@3ce the CcMnmisston^r, These two representations Shri Rajeev Shrivasta^a, State submits that tliese ar4 examine the grievance ^inder t|ie Election Commissi<j>n or wcongly that s^^c^ethe l^^^i before the respondent^ / examined and disposed ofo Shri A^S, Gaharwar<i U< Counsel for Uniori of India supplied to bim aad he make^ allowed to him to seek instj instead of keepJLng this filj inasmi4ch ^N^Nh-^m^r ^ fe^ T{^ZR ^ 3TRR-.3*11^1 tjngfaai leari^d ccunsel for the Sl'lrivastava, learned PL for the ^rit petitioner was earlier high- Isubmitted before the ChJef Eleow jof Cfthattlsgarh on 10/5/2001. representation also Ma&^lsieen •» Bilaspur dated 4/2/2001, stUl pending^ leatned PL forthe respondent/ not the proper authorit^to^ as the a^thority is vested of India, It.appears^rightly •^LS^^ p^titiooer ha<? ^^SOGR€ griavance the same ought to have been arned Sr »Central Government Standl^ ubmits that copy has not^been subxaissjLon that some-time may be uctions^ I am of the view that » before this Coart^ I would [TJt^^fe4 o<2 ^l'^ ^T 1^Ti^^si¥I ^^N'^tn ^^ tc^ ^•?"1' . 3TT^T^^^('^f^^?) an^l "i^T^R Tiltn ratber direct the Authorlities before whom some repre- of Eeceipt of this ocder •^N^flFT -HTR^ ^ fe^t Tf^RZK '^ ^rf^R ^nt^? seatations are pending t^ examine and dispose of the same on merit<» Accardingly this pjstition ±s diaposedof with the direction that respo|ndent no»2 shall examine and dispose of the represent^tion (Annexure P/3) <te:ted 10/5/200l within a peric^a of two months froai the date .A so also r^spondent no^3 \ examine and dlspose of t|ie repcesentation(Annexure P/4I dated 4/2/2001 withJLn a jperiod of two months fram tte date of receipt of this jorder* Annexuce P/4 tias bjeen subs®=[uentlysubraitted by the writ petitioner and jthe same has been taken on record, The writ petitijoner shall supply coroplete coptfsof th®the petitionj within a week from toda^< Certified copy as to the respective authorities jper rulese Sd/- Chief Justice 10s ti ^4