Crl.M.No.M-25625 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-25625 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 28, 2010 Baldev Singh and others .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.Bhavna Gupta, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr.MPS Mann, Advocate for the complainant. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.213, dated 29.12.2008, registered under Sections 302, 307, 324, 34 IPC, at Police Station Sadar, Gurdaspur, District Gurdaspur, Punjab, in which they have been summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 7.9.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.Nos.45655-56 of 2010 Both the applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-25625 of 2010 Contends that petitioners have not been named in the FIR and that police also after investigation found them innocent and did not file challan against them. Further contends that petitioners have been summoned to face trial by Crl.M.No.M-25625 of 2010 (O&M) -2- learned trial Court just on the statement of Jatinder Kumar to the effect that he allegedly heard petitioners talking while sitting in the field of Baldev Singh to kill Ajay Kumar, deceased. Further contends that though Jatinder Kumar stated in his statement that he had told about this fact to Surinder Kumar-PW and however, Surinder Kumar did not disclose anything in his statement regarding this alleged fact. Notice of motion for 28.9.2010. In the meantime, petitioners are directed to appear before learned trial Court on the date fixed, i.e., 9.9.2010, and however, if they so appear and apply for regular bail, they be admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court to its satisfaction subject to any conditions that may deem to be imposed by it. Copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of the Reader of this Court.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that pursuant to the said order, the petitioners have already appeared before learned trial Court and admitted to interim bail vide order dated 9.9.2010. Further contends that petitioners undertake to appear before learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing to face trial. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 7.9.2010, granting interim bail to petitioners-Baldev Singh, Ruldu Ram and Raj Kumar, is, hereby made absolute subject to any conditions that may deem to be imposed by learned trial Court. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 28.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge