HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR W.P.NG.1981of2€Ki5 Petittonsr Versus Respondents 1. 3. Badri Prasad Gadhev»'al»aged 57 yeQFS, son of tete Shri Mot< Lai Qsdhewa!, resident of near Jstsya talab, Jarhabhata, Biiaspur, teteil & d!'st"ct Bi'laspur (Chhatt'sgarh) State of Chhattisgsrh. through the S^oretery, departmont of Home, Raipur (C.G). Superlntend^nt of Police, Biia^pur, tehs'? and dtetrtet 8i<aspur (C.G.) C^ficer in-charge, Pojjcs StaSion Civll Une. Ktespur, tehsil and di'stricf Bilaspur (C.G.) [.... WRST PETSTION UNDER ARTiCLE 22S/227 OF THE CONsTiTyTION OF JMDlA SB: Hon'bSe Justjce Satish K. Agnihotri Shn Somna^h Wrma, Advocate for the pe&»one/-. Sh" V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate Genera! with Shr' Safsh Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocats for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 14th day of June, 200T) 1. The respondent No.2 Supersntendent of PoSice^ Bilaspur has fIJed the report dated 12.6.2007. Indicating that action ha-s been taken and a case has been registered at Crime No. 1038/2004. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate Gensrai submjts that aS! the accused persons have been arrested except Devkl Bai, as she Is not trsceabte. The Appropriate steps Vv'ould be taken as eariy as possible for arresting said Devki Bai. 3. The respondent No.2 Is directed to fiie affidavit to the abovs effsct for pSacing the facts on record. 4. !n view of the above, nothing sun/ives in this matter. HoVifever, the respondents are directed to take further steps in accordance v^ith law to securs the iustice and to see that the accused persons are deait v/ith In accordance with iay/. 5. Sn vie'tV of the above, thls petjtion stands disposect of. No order as to CGStS. __- Thakur Sd/- Satish K. AgnihoW Judge