IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9206 of 2009 MEENA PRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 5.8.2009 KHAN Pursuant to the agreement no.48F-2/2006-07 for construction of building of Science Laboratory and Library under the Chief Minister Development Scheme, the work was executed by the petitioner to the satisfaction of all concerned. The petitioner states that the total sanctioned amount was Rs.9,86,912/- and the petitioner had executed the work to the extent of Rs.9,85,983/- out of which only Rs.7,28,930/- has been paid. The petitioner submits that a sum of Rs.2,57,053/- as well as 5% term deposit has been withheld. In support of his contention that the petitioner had executed the work to the satisfaction of all concerned, he has relied upon Annexures-2 and 4 which is enquiry report dated 7.9.2008 of Assistant Engineer, Building Construction Department, Sheohar and the Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Sheohar. It also appears that the petitioner had filed a representation which is contained in Annexure-3. Having heard counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that if the petitioner files a fresh representation before the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Patna, respondent no.2, he would dispose of the same within two months from the date of its filing and would pay the admitted dues of the petitioner within a period of two months thereof. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) 2