IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 16 of 2008() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN MACA.1734/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT ----------------------- UNITED INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., VADAKKANCHERRY ROAD, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.S.MOHAMMED USMAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------ 1. SHAJU, S/O KUNAJAPPAN, AGED 40 YEARS, VADAKKETHALAKKAL HOUSE, KULLUPURAM, P.O.KADAVALLUR, THRISSUR. 2. K.V.JACOB, S/O VAREED, KOOTHOOR HOUSE, AKATHIYOOR P.O., THRISSUR. 3. BENNET K.J., S/O K.V.JACOB, KOOTHOOR HOUSE, AKATHIYOOR P.O., THRISSUR. BY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.16 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 11th January, 2008. O R D E R The appeal filed by the Insurance Company, contending that the applicant in the Original Petition is a gratuitous passenger, was dismissed on the ground that no such contention was raised before the Tribunal and evidence adduced. Even if my judgment is wrong, the remedy available to the petitioner is to challenge it, in accordance with law, and not to file any review. I find no error apparent on the face of the records. Hence, this Review Petition is dismissed. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj.