1 6 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6288/2007. Roopa Ram Vs. State & Ors. Date of Order :: 30th January 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. B.N. Kalla ] Mr. Chetan Parihar ], for the petitioner. Mr. N.K. Mehta, Dy. G.C., for the respondents. ..... BY THE COURT: This writ petition has been preferred against the order dated 21.09.2007 as passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Didwana in Civil Misc. No.26/2007 whereby the learned Additional District Judge has refused the prayer for grant of interim relief during the pendency of appeal filed by the plaintiff-petitioner against the order dated 05.09.2007 as passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Didwana rejecting an application for temporary injunction as made by the plaintiff- petitioner. The learned Deputy Government Counsel informs on instructions that after passing of the impugned order, the main appeal as filed by the plaintiff-petitioner has itself been dismissed by the appellate court on 19.01.2008. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert this submission. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial court has erroneously rejected the prayer for temporary injunction. 2 Without going into the merits of the order passed by the learned trial court on 05.09.2007, suffice is to say for the purpose of the present writ petition that if the main appeal itself stands decided by the appellate court, there appears no reason, occasion or necessity to consider any interference in the impugned order dated 21.09.2007 refusing the prayer for interim relief during the pendency of the said appeal. Even otherwise, there appears no error apparent on the face of the record so far the order dated 21.09.2007 is concerned so as to warrant interference in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition stands rejected. No costs. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. Mohan/