IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2010 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36831 of 2010(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- CHINTHA.V.P, D/O.VIKRAMA KURUP.J, AGED 21 YEARS, CHITHANYA,OORUPOIKA,OORUPOIKA P.O, ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI. K.SIJU, SRI.PRATHEESH.P, SMT.BINDU GEORGE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE PRINCIPAL,A P R M CENTRAL SCHOOL, CHITHARA P.O, KOLLAM 691 559. 2. REGIONAL OFFICER, CBSE,REGIONAL OFFICE, 16TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR,WEST , CHENNAI 600 101. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, C B S E, NEW DELHI-1. R2 & R3 BY SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, S.C, S.B.S.E. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 36831 of 2010 D ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 10th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a student of the School of which the first respondent is the Principal. In Ext.P2, the certificate issued by the third respondent, according to the petitioner, there is a mistake regarding her date of birth and also the initial to her mother's name. It is stated that seeking correction of the above, she made Ext.P3 request to the first respondent and Ext.P3(a) to the second respondent. It is stated that orders have not been passed so far and, therefore, this writ petition is filed. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 submits that it is for the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 and forward the application with his recommendation and that it is only thereafter the second respondent can consider the request. 3. Now that going by the pleadings, the request of the W.P.(C) No.36831/10 : 2 : petitioner is pending before the first respondent, I direct that on the production of a copy of this judgment, the first respondent will consider Ext.P3 application in the light of the materials produced and also in the light of the principles laid down by this Court in Exts.P4 and P5 judgments. On such consideration, the first respondent shall make his recommendations to the second respondent and on receipt thereof, the second respondent shall, after conducting necessary enquiry, consider the application and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge