IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5912 of 2008. Decided on: 09.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Raghuvir Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Parmod Kumar versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP No.3392 of 2010, decided on 18.08.2010. 2. According to the petitioner he did not get an opportunity to present his case before the University. In case he has still any dispute with regard to the factual position, it will be open to him to present his version before the second respondent, in which case, the second respondent will consider the matter afresh after affording the opportunity 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - of hearing to the petitioner within a period of four months after production of copy of this judgment. 3. Consequently, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 09, 2010. (sck).