IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14373 of 2005 MD.ALAM Versus THE REG.PROVIDENT(PENSION)FUND COMMISSIONER & ORS. ----------- 4/ 14.05.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. J.P. Verma appears for the respondent-Employees Provident Fund Organization. The petitioner who superannuated from the services of the Gaya Cotton & Jute Mill, a unit of the National Textile Corporation and obtained voluntary retirement from the establishment under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme with effect from 1.5.2002, has filed the writ petition being aggrieved by the fixation of his pension by the respondent- Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the provisions of the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. According to the petitioner although he was entitled to a monthly pension of Rs. 1038/- per month but the respondents had fixed a pension of Rs. 588/- and which was much lesser than his entitlement. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent-Employees Provident Fund Organization setting out the details of calculation of the pension of the petitioner. It is stated that upon re-examination of the petitioner a fresh calculation has been made and the petitioner has been found to be entitled a monthly pension of Rs. 614/-. It is further stated that same would require a further examination in the light of the amendment introduced in the Scheme in the year 2007. 2 There is no rejoinder to the said counter affidavit. Having regard to the submissions made in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)