IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2011 :PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K, PATIL AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA C.C.C.NO. 2087 OF 2010 (CIVIL) Between: Krupa Education Society, Hubli, duly represented by its Chairman Shri. G. Rajkumar, S/o. G.R. Krupadanam, Aged about 64 years, 0cc: Pensioner and Chairman complainant society, R/o. Renuka Nagar, Gokul Road, Hubli. Complainant (By Sri. B.K. Anand, Advocate> And: 1. Sri. M. Prabhuswamy, The Under Secretary to the Government of Karnataka, Education Department, Ministry of Karnataka, M.S. Building, Bangalore. 1. 2. Sri. Bhaskar Vishnu Bhat, V The Deputy Director of Public Instructions, Dharwad. 3. Sri, D.S. Rajanna, The Director (Primary Education) Public Education Department, Bangalore. 4. Sri. Raghunandan Nadadur, The Secretary, Government of Karnataka, Education Department, M.S. Building, Bangalore. 1. Accused (Sri. N. Dinesh Rao, Government Advocate for Accused) This C.C.C. is filed under sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of Constitution of India, praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the accused and punish them for willfully and intentioanlly disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.12810/2005 dated 4.8.2006 and the order dated 16.9.2009 passed in W.A. No.562/2007 and etc. This C.C.C. coming on for Orders this day, N.K.Patil J., made the following: :ORDER: This contempt petition is filed by the complainant praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the accused and punish them for willfully and intentionally disobeying the order passed by the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.No.12810/2005 dated 4.8.2006 and the I i/j / Division Bench of this Court dated 16.9.2009 passed in W.A. No.563/2007. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the complainant and learned Government Advocate for accused. 3. During the course of the submission, learned Government Advocate for Accused submitted that, the orders passed by the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of this Court as referred above have been complied with, subject to the result of the Special Leave Petition pending before the Apex Court. Further, the learned Government Advocate for the accused has produced the proceedings dated 27.12.2010 bearing No.ED: 256: PMC: 2009 (Ba) along with the memo. The same is placed on record. 4. In view of the compliance of the directions issued by the learned Single Judge and by the Division Bench of this Court, the instant contempt proceedings stands dropped, reserving liberty to the complainant to ‘4 4 redress his grievance before the appropriate Legal Forum, if still he is aggrieved by the order passed by the competent authority of the accused. sd/ JUDGE Sd/i. / JUDGE $1 tsn*