HJGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BSLASPUR S.B.: HON'BLE SHRi JUSTICESUMiL_KUMAR_S|NHA ^ CONTEMPT CASE (C) N0. 226/2010 PETJTSONER RESPQNDENT Ramanand Prasad, S/o Late Shri MitShu Prasad, aged about 47 years, working as Assistant Grade- Eil, O/o Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Korba (C.G.) VERSUS Mr. C.K. Khetan, Secretary, Water Resources Department, Secretariat. D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) CgMTI T^ETlTION UNDERARTICLE2150FJHEC^^^^ QF !NDSA Aopearance: Mr. Sameer Behar.'A4vb<.os.4&. R^y ^t;-t.'on<-n. ;1 ORALgRDIR (17.09.2010) SUNIL KUIVIAR SINHA,J. Heard on admission. Petitioner- Ramanand Prasad has fi!ed this petitlon for instiation of proceeding of contempt for disobedience of the order dated 12.08.2010 passed in W.P.(s) No. 4454/2010. Mr. Sameer Behar, iearned counsel for the petitioner, submits that after passing of order dated 12.08.2010, the petitioner made a representation before the respondent but no decision has been taken by the respondent. Therefore, the respondent has committed contempt of the Court's order dated 12.08.2010. This Court whiie disposing W.P(s) No. 4454/2010 passed the foilowing order on 12.08.2010. "Heard. Learned counsei for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to fiie a representation. Permission granted. Accordingiy, the vmt petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid ilberty granted in favour of the petitioner." A perusal of the eariier order wouid show that there was no direction issued by thls Court, therefore, it cannot be said that if the ^ .^ CONTEIVIPT CASE fC) N0. 228/2010 representation fiied by the petitloner has not been decided by the respondent, it wouid amount to contempt of order dated 12.08.2010 in view of the above, E do not find any substance in this petition; the petition is ilable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summari!y. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge