HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W. P. NO: 18411 of 2009 DATED 07.09.2009 Between: B.Vikram .... PETITIONER AND Guntakal Municipality, rep. By its Commissioner .....RESPONDENT O R D E R:- The petitioner asserts that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the property bearing D.No.17-227, 229 & 229 in an extent of 144 Sq. yards of land situated at Gooty Road, Guntakal, Anantapur District, having purchased the same under registered sale deed dated 05.02.2009. He states that when he applied for grant of building permission, he was informed by the respondent-Municipality that some portion of his property falls under the road widening programme as per the master plan, and that unless he surrenders the portion of the land that is going to be affected, permission will not be granted. The petitioner states that then he surrendered the portion of the land in an extent of 41.90 Sq. Metres that is going to be affected under the road widening programme to the respondent free of cost by giving an undertaking to that effect, and thereafter, based on the permission granted by the respondent-Municipality, he made constructions with minor deviations to suit the Vasthu. While so, the petitioner states that the respondent-Municipality issued notice dated 25.3.2009 stating that he has constructed the building without leaving 1.95 mts place on 30 ft. road side, and demolished the pillars erected by him. The petitioner states that after leaving the set backs, he again started making constructions as per the approved plan without any deviation, and it his grievance that the respondent-Municipality, at the instance of local persons, who are inimical to him, is interfering with the construction of the building, which the petitioner contends, is illegal and arbitrary. When the matter came up on 02.09.2009, this Court directed the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Municipality to get instructions. Today when the matter is called, it is represented by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Municipality that the respondent- Municipality has already initiated action against the petitioner by demolishing the constructions made by him contrary to the sanctioned plan, and he further submitted that if there any structures raised by the petitioner contrary to the sanctioned plan, they will issue notice to the petitioner and after considering the explanation, if any, that may be submitted by him, they will take action against such structures. In view of the above submission, no orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. No costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J 7th September, 2009 bcj