IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33720 of 2009 PRADIP RANJAN CHOUDHARY @ RUPESH CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 06. 04. 2010. Heard Mr. Kumar Praveen, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Jibendra Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P.No.2 as also Mr. Hriday Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 122/2009 dated 15. 07. 2009, registered under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. In compliance of the previous order dated 30. 03. 2010, the petitioner and O.P. No. 2 are physically present in the Court and they have been duly identified by their respective lawyers. It is submitted by the learned counsel for both sides that the entire disputes between the husband and wife have been amicably sorted out and they have decided to live like legally married husband and wife. The terms of compromise have been incorporated in the joint compromise petition, which have been duly sworn by both sides and it has also been signed by learned counsel appearing on their behalf. The aforesaid compromise petition has been filed in the Court today. Let it be kept on the record. In view of the aforesaid compromise, it is directed that 2 petitioner shall take his wife (O.P.No.2) along with their girl child from her paternal house on 10th April, 2010. It is further directed that the petitioner shall keep the O.P. 2 as his legally wedded wife and shall provide all dignity and comfort. O.P. No. 2 is also directed to have a cordial relationship with the husband (petitioner). It is expected that terms and conditions arrived at shall be fully complied with by both sides. In the aforesaid background the petitioner, namely, Pradip Ranjan Choudhary @ Rupesh Choudhary, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 122/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Non compliance of the terms of compromise would be treated as misuse of privilege of bail and consequences shall follow. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)