1-23 % 10.09.2010 Present: Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Counsel for plaintiff. Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Counsel for defendants No. 1 Si 2. + I.A. No.12053/2010 (u/0 23 R 1 & 2 CPC) in CS(OS) No. 2475/2009 * Plaintiff is the daughter of defendants No. 1 S< 2 and she is said to have resolved the controversy raised in this suit for partition of the suit property with defendants No. 1 S( 2 and therefore, this joint application, which is duly signed by the plaintiff and defendants No. 1 Si 2 and their respective Counsels, has been filed. This application is also accompanied by the Affidavits of plaintiff and defendants No. 1 Si 2. Counsel for the parties state that in terms of 1^, settlement arrived at between the plaintiff and defendants No. 1 Si 2, plaintiff has been put in possession of part of premises No. 8, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi, and therefore, she does not wish to pursue this suit in respect of the aforementioned property and other properties against defendants No. 1 Si 2. Infact, in this application, the plaintiff gives up the claim against the remaining defendants, who are ex parte vide last order. After going through the application and record of CS(OS)No. 2475 of2009 ^ Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified >■ this case, I find that the settlement arrived at between the parties is lawful one and therefore, this application is allowed and the plaintiff is permitted to unconditionally withdraw this suit qua defendants No. 1 & 2. The date of 13"" December, 2010, already fixed in this case, stands cancelled and this suits stands disposed of qua defendants No. 1 & 2 and dismissed qua defendants No. 3 to 8. il Gaur, J. September 10, 2010 rs /'^ . .. A-' I -Ai- lou 1' : b 14 CS(OS) No. 2475 of2009 Page 2