1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTON WRIT PETITION NO.2370 OF 2009 Mahesh Ramkishan Shandilya .. Petitioner V/s Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.M.Vashi i/by M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the Petitioner. Ms.S.A.Modle for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr.A.C.Singh i/by Mr.D.R.Shah for Respondent No.3. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 12th August, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. Perused the record including the report submitted by the Court Commissioner. It appears that the Respondent No.3 is running a restaurant after obtaining permissions that are necessary to be obtained. It also appears that there are others also who are using the premises on the ground floor for commercial purpose, but the petitioner has not complained against others. It appears that the petitioner has some grudge against the Respondents and therefore he is persecuting Respondents. 2. We do not see any reason to interfere. Petition is rejected. 3. Commissioner’s cost is quantified at Rs.3000/-. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)