1 Cri.Appln.No.1464/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1464/2011 ( Deepak Laxman Khajekar Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SB Rajebhosale, Adv. for Applicant/s; Mr. KM Suryawanshi, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 26 th April, 2011. 1) Heard finally. 2) In an incident dated 5.11.2010, the accused allegedly, on account of non-preparation of proper food, picked up quarrel and doused kerosene on his wife and set her ablaze. She was admitted at the hospital and discharged. The Discharge Card illustrates, it was 40% superficial deep burns. She was discharged on 25.12.2010. 3) The accused/applicant is facing custody from November 2010. The wife is at her parental house, charge is framed, however, trial has not yet commenced, which would take time as other procedural formalities are yet to be adhered to. 4) The other accused – Laxman Khajekar and Dilip Khajekar are released by the learned Sessions Judge. 5) The Counsel submits, that the incident has taken place at around 8.30 p.m. and before 2 Cri.Appln.No.1464/2011 her FIR could be taken, she was tutored by her brother – Shrimant, another brother – Adam; mother – Saraswati and relations Ramesh, Sangita and Kavita. Resultantly, the spices are added to the FIR. The spot panchanama illustrate, the victim herself locked the door of the room and doused kerosene on her person and set herself ablaze and based on her shouts, the accused/applicant entered the house by breaking the door and extinguished the fire with other family members. 6) Survey of above facts does not warrant further custody of the accused/applicant. 7) The accused/applicant – Deepak Laxman Khajekjar, be released on his furnishing PR bond and a surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand). 8) The accused/applicant shall not coerce the witnesses and particularly his wife, the complainant; nor shall visit her parental house till conclusion of trial. The accused/applicant shall scrupulously attend the court proceedings, failure to do so on two consecutive occasions would entail cancellation of the bail. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/