t.'· - $-37 and 38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF D'ElHI AT NEW DELHI + CRl.M.C.2210/2011 RAJENDER SINGH & DRS. .. ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Rohilla, Adv. versus STATE & DRS. .. ... Through: Mr. Anilrudh Yadav, Adv. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with ASI Ramwati, P.S. Dwarka Sector, 23, Delhi. AND CRl.M.C. 2211[2011 DHARAM SINGH & DRS. .. ... Petitioner Through: Mr. De¢palk Rohilla, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. .. ... CORAM: Through: Mr. Anirudih Yadav, Adv. Mr. M.P. Singh, State with ASI Ramwati, P.S. DwaJi'ka Sector, 23, Delhi. HON'BlE MR. JUSTICE SURIESti KAIT ORDER % 18.07.2011 1. These are the two cross cases. The one is an FIR No. 59/2010, which was registered against t!he petitioner Nos 1 to 3 Sh. Rajender Singh, Smt. Narani Devi, and Mr.Dm Parkash under Sections 308/323/452/506/34 ·IPC at P:S. Sector 23, Dwarka, New Delhi, who are petitioners in Criminal 2210/2011. 2. The another is an FIR No. 505/2009, which was registered against the petitioners namely DharamSingh, Manish and Smt. Bimla, who are petitioners in Criminal M.e. 2211/2011 3 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in both the cases Charge sheets have already been filed and these are Signing Date:31.08.2024 17:26:12 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified pending for the framing of charges. 4. It is submitted that a fight took place on a very small issue i.e on some drainage/'Nali'. Both the petitioners are neighbourers to each other. Due to the intervention of the society persons and their friends they have amicably settled the disputes and both the parties are not interested to pursue the matter against each other. 5. Since the matter has already been settled between the parties and they are resident of the samle locality and they are neighbourers, in the interest of justice, I quash the FIR Nos.59/2010 and 5050/2009 registered at P.S. Sector 23 Dwarka, Delhi 6. In the present case, as the investigating agency/police has already filed the charge sheet in the court, therefore, the Government Machinery was used, apart from the precious time of the court taken. Though the petitioners do not seem to be the persons of good means, keeping in view their financial conditions into view, I impose a cost of f 15001- only in both the petitions each to be deposited in the Advocate Welfare Fund, Bar Council of Delhi within a week from today. 7. Accordingly, Criminal Me Nos.2210/2011 & 2211/2011 are disposed of. 8. Dasti. JULY 18, 2011 j SURESH KAIT,J