WA 357/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U.B. SAHA The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 1.7.2010 passed by a learned Sing le Judge in WP(C) No.475/2007. The Respondent had apparently forged a Ph. D. Degree and as such criminal procee ding as well as disciplinary proceeding were initiated against him. The Criminal Court acquitted the respondent of the criminal charges during the p endency of the writ petition which arose out of an order of dismissal from servi ce as a result of the disciplinary proceedings. Taking this development into consideration, the learned Single Judge directed th e appellants to reconsider the case of the respondent afresh if the respondent s ubmits a representation to the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants says that the respondent has submitted a repr esentation on 5th July, 2010. If that is the position, the appellants may consid er the representation on its own merits. We find no error in the direction given by the learned Single Judge. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed.