IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 7956/2008 Decided on:1.12.2010 _____________________________________________ D.D. Ratwan. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No.1. Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate for respondent No.2. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that the respondent-Department is not applying proper roster for filling up the posts of Executive Engineers (Mechanical) by way of promotion. 2. Mr. Dilip Sharma submits that Annexure A-10 has not been properly drawn roster. According to him, promotion should be made as per the roster reflected in Annexure A-9. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?no 2 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner after verifying the contents of Annexure A-9. In case Annexure A-9 reflects the true position, case of the petitioner shall be considered for promotion. However, it is made clear that the persons, who have already been promoted, shall not be affected. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 1.12.2010 *awasthi*