^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. S'S'-\\ OF 2010 PETITIONER Mahamaya Mahila Swa Sahayta Samuh Sanjaygram through its President , Smt. Jawa Bai Mahant W/o. Shri Itwari Das Mahant, aged about 40 Years R/o Village and Post Sanjay Gram, Tahsil- Charapa, Distt.- Janjgir- (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ..•• *** oy ^' .^^- ^ff>>" ~7/i^y /y^' -$?•",,,» ^:'-' ^ <?<y 'f .-/s' ^"y ^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Mantralay D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.), 2. Collector, Janjgir-Champa , Janjgir-Chaaipa (CG). 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Champa , District Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. TahsUdar, Champa, Distt.- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) .5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Champa, District Janjgir-Champa (CG). 6. Jai Maa Laxmi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh, Sanjaygram, through its President at Village Sanjaygram, Tahsil Champa, District - Janjgir-Champa (CG). WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA 1. Particulars of the petitioner: As stated in the cause title. .1-\v ^ •3tf ..* IHATTi !T (C) N0. 5841 Versus Mahamava Mahiia Swa Sahayta Samuh Sanjaygram. State of Chhattisaarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTiON OF INDIA ^-< Shri Awadh Tripath'!, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lav/ver for the St£ (Passed on 5'" day of October, 2010) Learned counsei aDpearing for the petitioner submits that the order- cum-show cause notice dated 23/27.8.2010 was issued whiie suspending the operation of the petitioner's mid-day mea! service at Governmerii Primarv Schoo! and Middle Schooi, Gadamor (Sanjaygram). Pursuant to the impugned notice and order dated 23/27.8.2010, the petitioner has replled to the above-stated show cause notice alongwith an affidavit (Annexure P-5 & P-6) on 28.7.2010. No order has yet been passed. In the meantime, it appears that the service of mid-day mea! has been handed over to some other person on temporary basis, i.e. respondent No.6. Learned counse! appearina. for the respondent State submlts that if no order has been passed on the repiy filed by the petiiioner, the same shall be done as expeditiousiy as possible, within a period of two weeks from t'ne date of receiDt of a com of this order, In accordance with iaw and on its own merits, after affording an opportunlty of hearing to the petitioner and respondent No.6. In view < ihe petiti foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for nothlna remains for adiudication, thus the writ petition Sd/- Satish K. Agaihotn Judge