IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9985 of 2010 1. HABIBULLAH, SON OF MIR MUNSHI 2. MD. SAFIULLAH @ SAFIULLAH, SON OF MIR HABIBULLAH 3. AJIZ ANSARI, SON OF FAZRUL RAHRAM ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SEIKHI CHAKIA, P.S. CHAKIA, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN. 4. IFTEKHAR, SON OF LATE MD. WASI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LADAURA, P.S. KUDHNI, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. 5. SAMI @ ABDUL SAMI, SON OF LATE NAZBUR IMAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – GOCHI KUNDAWA, P.S. KESARIA, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN. ------ PETITIONERS. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 6.2.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No. 959 of 2007 by which the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari, has refused the an application filed under Section 228 Cr. P.C. The petitioners submit that in the facts of the case, no case under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out because the occurrence took place in the background of land dispute and there was counter version of the occurrence and also simple injury was found on the person of the injured, I am unable to appreciate the contention raised herein. However, in case, at any stage, the trial court finds that there is a need to amend the charge, he is expected to do so. With these observations, this application is disposed of. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)