HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA Criminal Revision Case No.507 of 2005 ORDER: Palacole P.S. had registered a case in Crime No.47/98 against the revision petitioner-accused for the offence under Section 392 IPC and laid a charge sheet in the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Palacole against the petitioner- accused for the said offence in C.C.No.191 of 1998. After conclusion of the trial, the trial court had found the revision petitioner-accused guilty for the offence under Section 392 IPC and accordingly convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default, simple imprisonment for three months by the judgment dated 8.11.2000. That aggrieved by the said order of conviction, the revision petitioner- accused had preferred Criminal Appeal No.269 of 2000 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge (FTC), Narsapur, West Godavari wherein the impugned conviction and sentence of the petitioner-accused was confirmed by the said appellate court by its judgment dated 21.6.2004. Aggrieved by the said judgment of the appellate court, the appellant –accused therein has preferred this Criminal Revision Case. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner-accused submits that since the revision petitioner-accused was initially convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years by the trial court by its orders dated 8.11.2000 and the same having been confirmed by the appellate court, ie. VI Additional District Judge, FTC, Narsapur, by its judgment dated 21.6.2004, the accused had already, by now, served the entire sentence and was released from the jail, and as such, she informs the court that the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. _______________ B.N.RAO NALLA,J 17-02-2011 Stp HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA Criminal Revision Case No.507 of 2005 17-02-2011