CW 9022/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.9022/2010 Surendra Singh Versus State & Ors Date of Order ::: 26/07/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Nitin Jain, for petitioner. Instant petition has been filed with the grievance that after the petitioner being served with charge sheet U/r 16 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958, the affidavit being sole touch stone for holding disciplinary inquiry be sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, - result whereof would alone be sufficient to examine fate of the inquiry. Once the charge sheet having been served upon delinquent, the disciplinary authority is ceased of the matter and if the petitioner has any objection in regard to the affidavit, it has to be examined by inquiry officer and he is always at liberty to make such representation to the authority but interference at this stage may cause prejudice the fate of inquiry. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, if the petitioner submits representation afresh, it is always expected from the authority to examine and decide the same in accordance with law and be communicated to the petitioner. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.1/ 9022CW2010July26DERep.doc