IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.303 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ram Singh S/o Jaman Singh ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 11, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.01/2010 Under Sections 304B, 498A of IPC and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Patwari Area Raigaon, District Champawat. ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant is father-in-law of the deceased Bhavna. The applicant is not at all beneficiary of the demand of dowry. In the FIR, there is no allegation of demand of dowry or of committing any harassment for the demand of dowry upon the deceased by the applicant. It is pleaded that the applicant is an old man and is also ailing with serious diseases. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Ram Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Champawat. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 11.03.2010 RG