~-F ^ ^ r<s 's'sf ^wwi, &v\wi<», fs]diylj,< HWW vtiw^i 3H^T ^il i<;-li+ ^STT ^TT^TgRqN? <.,. 31I^ITR?C ?:RIWgfe(CT^I w. PETITIQNBR Santoslli Gurune. S/o Late Shri Bhimraj Gurung. aged alj Vallabhl (CG) RBSPQNDESTS 1. State Police 2. Mana, df Chliattisgarh, through Secretary, Home P.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) of PoUce, PoU.ee Training School, paipur (CG) Superujitendent Writ Petltion under Articl SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRJ!| 14-10-2008 Shri Prakash Tiwan, cdunsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Arun Sao. Govt. Ai Heard. By this petition unde| India, the petitioner has praj] Aimexure P-1, dated 23,7.3 dated 5.9.2008 issued to the| ^raF^Tqh tlTR^f if fS^ ^f^RSK ^sifinsn^i '. (81 No.5679/2008 /^^^+ on iTa»<->t~ci UUL AU j^cu.o, •*Tc>cfI/:t*a-ri4- r\-f Pn/^l-tr^d/l-i AT''*!'''"* ji.i/ojiU.^/iJ.i- \Js. 1 aiL/U.j^i-U.A KciA.ct^ Nagar, Raipur, Tah.sU and Distriet-Ralpur Versus fc 226/227 ofthe CoasUtutionofIadla MISHRA, J Ivocate for the respondents/State. Article 226/227 of the Constitution of ;d for quashing fhe order of suspension of !008 aad char^e sheet of Auaexure P-5, petitioner by the respondeut No.2. The only ground argu^d by leanied counsel for the petitioner is fhat the petitipner is alsp fi petitioner on fhe sam.e charel ciag criminal prosecution ia the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Cl^ss at Durg for ofifenee putushable uader Section 379 of the IPC iu rdlation to fhe soiue incident aiid tiierefore, initiation of the departme^ital proceediags and suspensiou of fhe :. is untenable and coutrary to law. I-HG—78 ^sr ^iAiid'4, riy1y<i<°, ftc-ii'Hi< N1*TWI (h*11<*> •^T. 200 gn^r -^v C^ty^) sn^i'EBI'f^fhr 'dsn'sn^r ^R*<N) .ifr s<- -3- ^' (S'Kll'^T ^l^tl -z- traiaitig From perusal of fhe wr}1 therewifh it appears that the ^i constable and uadei^oing Maaa. He abscoaded from tus di to the P.T.S. staflF. Thercafter, fherefore cruninal case under Cl 379, 34 of the IPC has been reg|i has also been filed iu the Court ofl Haviug heard learaed counj tfae charge &aiaed against proceediugs that he absconded the P.T.S. staff, I am. ofthe opinioj in the initiation of departinental his suspensioii. TIie petition has no force; is accordiagly disnussed at the *l<<fcl<i)-< 'qi'Rff 'if'fs1^ Tte5R ^TsiRpTaDia petitftn aad docuinents annexed ititioner is a newly recruited police at Police Traiaing School (P.T.S,), ities on 17,7,2008 without intimation [he comiaitted offenee at Bhilai aud [ime Number 182/08 uuder Sections istered against him aud charge sheet Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg. sel for the petttioner, having regard to petitioner in the departmental [roiu his duties without intuaation to that there is no iIlegaUly or infirmify Elroceediass agaiast fhe petitioner after tte .Otl tbe same is liable to be dismissed aad adjiiissian stay: itself. f Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge