Crl. Misc. No. M-6077 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-6077 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 22, 2011 Gaurav …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.A.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) This order will dispose of a petition for grant of regular bail pending trial. The petitioner has not been attributed any specific injury on the person of complainant- Tarlochan Singh. The petitioner has been involved in the case with the aid of Section 149 IPC being a member of unlawful assembly. Crl. Misc. No. M-6077 of 2011 [2] While dismissing his earlier petition for bail, it was observed that he would have liberty to file a fresh petition after some evidence is produced. In the present case the injured Tarlochan Singh and Gurmeet Ram have been declared proclaimed offenders in other criminal cases pending against them. They being not available, they have not attended the Court as prosecution witnesses. The co-accused of the petitioner who have been attributed injuries have been granted the concession of bail on account of the prosecution witnesses having evaded appearance for a long duration. The petitioner has been in custody w.e.f March 28, 2010. Taking into consideration the abovesaid circumstances, the petitioner can be released on bail. Petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court subject to an additional condition that he will not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of during the pendency of the trial. In case of any such eventuality, it will be open to the prosecution agency to seek the cancellation of bail. March 22, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE