IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 24068 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2011 Mira Chopra ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan and Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Hirein Sharma and Mr. Gaurav Kathuria, Advocates for the complainant. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that considering the fact that the substantive offence in the FIR has now been changed from 304-B IPC to 306 IPC and as the case pleaded by the petitioner for pre-ar- rest bail before the court below was not under Section 306 IPC and similar is the position before this Court, he seeks permission to withdraw the pres- ent petition with liberty to file fresh anticipatory bail application in the court below under Section 306 IPC. Learned counsels for the State as well as complainant do not have any objection to the prayer of the petitioner being granted. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 02.09.2011 sharmila