IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34268 of 2008(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- FEBY FELIX, D/O.FELIX, MAVELI HOUSE, EDANAD P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.TITUS MANI VETTOM, ADV. SRI. SURAJ SUKUMARAN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *3. EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, KOTTAYAM. *THE ADDRESS OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AS EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE, PALA, KOTTAYAM. AS PER ORDER DTD. 20/11/2008 IN I.A. NO.14921/2008. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NANDAKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.34268/2008-D: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE R.3. EMPLOYMENT OFFICER. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DTD. 16/11/2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.34268 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 1st December, 2008. J U D G M E N T Heard Sri.Titus Mani, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.P.Nandakumar, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The petitioner had filed this writ petition aggrieved by the fact that overlooking her seniority, her juniors were sponsored for appointment to the post of Ophthalmic Assistant. After this writ petition was filed, it was noticed that the name of the petitioner was not sponsored due to an over sight. The said mistake was rectified and the petitioner's name was sponsored by the employment exchange. Pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 20.11.2008, the petitioner was also interviewed. In these circumstances, no further orders are required, except to direct that the participation of the petitioner W.P.(C) No.34268/2008 2 in the interview pursuant to the directions issued by this Court shall be treated as regular. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE nj.