IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 557 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2010 SHRI. NARAYAN S. RAWAL AND 14 ORS., ... Applicants Versus SMT. MANUELITA D'COSTA AND 17 ORS., ... Respondents Mr.Narendra Sawaikar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Advocate for the Original Petitioners. Mr. J. Supekar, Advocate for Respondent no.3 Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 10th August, 2010 P.C: Affidavit-in-reply of the Petitioners is tendered across the bar. The same is taken on record. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants has invited our attention to the communication dated 1st June, 2010 issued by the Village Panchayat Navelim. The learned Counsel states that the applicants have received the same on 4th August,2010. 3. Perusal of the orders passed in the writ petition show that there is no specific direction issued by this Court to demolish the structure of the applicants. The remedy of the applicants is to challenge the action of demolition in accordance with law. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants expresses an apprehension that the structure may be demolished immediately. 5. We find that there is no substance in the said apprehension of the learned counsel for the applicants. If the applicants have received the notice on 4th August,2010, it is obvious that the structure cannot be demolished for a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice by the applicants. 6. As the applicants have a remedy to challenge the order of demolition in accordance with law, it is not necessary to entertain this application for intervention. 7. Subject to what is observed above, the application is rejected. 8. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-