1 IN HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 101 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (St.) NO. 8928 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2006 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (St.)NO. 5968 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLN. NO. 158 OF 2006 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 103 OF 2009 IN REVIEW PETITION (St.) NO.8918 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION N. 163 OF 2006 2 Siddharaj Shambuling Habbu & Anr. ... Applicants Vs. Shri Siddheshwar Deosthan Panch Committee, Solapur & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Makarand D.Adkar, a/w Mr. S.R.Ganbavale,Advocate, for the applicants. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. (In Chamber at 2.30 p.m.) P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants 2. The applicants seek review of the Judgment of this Court delivered on 30th April, 2009 dismissing the above referred three Revision Applications filed by the different groups of the Poojaris or priests against the concurrent finding of the Charity Commissioner and the District Court. The dispute was mainly about interpretation of clauses 2 and 7 of the Compromise Decree in 3 Civil Suit No. 731 of 1939 which was filed by the trustees. The present applicants were not the parties either before the Charity Commissioner or the District Court or before this Court in revision. 3. The learned Counsel contends that certain words of clause 7 of the Compromise Decree need reconsideration. He also contends that the said Judgment and the interpretation will not be binding on the present applicants because they were not parties. By these Applications, they seek condonation of delay in filig the review petitions as well as review of the said order. 4. For the reasons given in the said Applications, the delay is condoned. I find that the present applicants have no locus standi to seek review of the Judgment of this Court in the Civil Revision Application to which litigation the applicants themselves are not parties. If they have got any right or interest in the temple or performance of pooja in the temple, they may take steps as may be advised under law. The Review Petitions are dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) 4