IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1930 RP.No. 1215 of 2007(T) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12979/2006 Dated 30/03/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 2 TO 5&7(1ST PETITIONER DIED AFTER THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ARE PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VINOD V.S., V.S. HOUSE, PALACE NAGAR, 110, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SHEETHAL V.S., V.S. HOUSE, PALACE NAGAR, 110, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. P. JAYA, W/O.G. SUBHASH BABU, VENKITESWARA BHAVAN, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. N. SOMADAS, VARSHA, KARIYIL, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. INDIRA VIJAYAN, SREYAS, PALACE NAGAR, 108, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH SRI.PRADEEP.V.S. SMT.A.K.PREETHA RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS & 6TH PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------ 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE TRIVANDRUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TRIDA), JAYA MANSION, VAZHUTHAKKADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. RP NO.1215/2007 2 3. TECHNO PARK, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. R. BALAKRISHNAN, RENJITH BHAVAN, PALACE NAGAR 109, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL, SC., TRIDA R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AHAMED, SC, TECHNOPARK R1 & R4 BY SR. G.P. SHRI BASANT BALAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. PADMANABHAN NAIR ,J. ------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.1215 of 2007 IN W.P.(C) No.12976 of 2006 T ------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 4th day of April, 2008 ORDER W.P.(C) No.12979/2006 was filed challenging Exts.P2 and P5 notifications. After hearing both sides I had dismissed the Writ Petition by judgment dated 30.3.2007. Now it is brought out that no Section 6(1) declaration was issued in this case within the statutory period. The period fixed for publication of Section 6(1) declaration already lapsed and hence entire land acquisition proceedings lapsed. In W.P.(C) No.26395/2007 I have considered that aspect and found that the very same notification which is under challenge in this Writ Petition already lapsed. So the entire land acquisition proceedings lapsed. Hence the judgment rendered by me on 30.3.2007 is reviewed and the Writ Petition is allowed declaring that the entire land acquisition proceedings lapsed. In the result, Review Petition is allowed. K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE. cks