£ ‘ émGLE Egmaww ‘ c K .\‘? / . ' ;N THE HON'BLE HIGH coum? OF @ATEISGARH ATjgLAspUR WRIT PETITmN No. “LS [f0 /2005 / Dinesh Kumar JaiSwal aged about 29~years son of Balram Prasad Jaiswal, by caste— Jaiswal, R/o. Pali Road Dipika chowki Dipika Tahsil Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) P EI‘ IT IONER AP?LICANT VERSUS RESPONDWT :— R/émt. Poonam Devi Jaiswal, ageri \0\{, about 23 years, wife of Dinesh y Kumar JaiSwal, daughter of. chandrika Prasad Gupta, by caste Gupta, R/o. ‘ Banki Mongra, P.S./ch9wki Banki— Mongra, Tah. Katghora, District f j Korba (C.G.)V. / ‘ ‘ NON —APPLICANT WRIT ?ETITION UNDER ARTIQJE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA q $ / XI—HC—22 m WW WW mlfs'a mmmw WWW#W®ER ' $Wm 20-7—2005 z Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri counsel for The pe‘rifioner. Shri Awadh Tripa'rhi‘ counsel for- respondent Heard learned counsel fur- lhe par'l'ies and perused fhe impugned order. Af The ou‘rsel, 5hri Tripa‘lhi, learned counsel for respondenf submif‘led fhal' fhe order of fhe frial Caurf 1'o the exfen‘l‘ of award of Rs.500/- as mainfenance allowan: e for The son is na'l' correct for fhe reason fhm fhe son is residing wilh The pei'i‘rioner herein. As far as Rs‘1500/- for gram of inferim mainienance To fhe respondent wife of The pe‘rifioner, is concerned, ihis is discretionary aower exercised by fhe frial Cour-1* and The peTiTioner has noT been able To poinT ouT The facT ThoT The discreTionary which The Trial CourT‘ is arbiTrary or conTrary To power was gercised by The focTs and circumsTances of The case, and Rs.2,000/- awarded in favour of respondenT for liTigaTion expe nses also cannoT be said To be arbiTrary. In The resulT, The wriT TiTion is parTly allowed and The impugned ‘\ order To The exTenT of granT f Rs.500/- mainTenance allowance for The L mainTenonce of The son is quash d and for remaining ParT The wriT peTiTion'“ is dismissed. In view of This order, M.( .)P. No.1199/2005 and LA. No.3004/2005 sTand disposed of. ParTies are enTiTled for c rTified copy of This order. Sd/- A l 1 L.C.Bhadoo Judge mvu'”V¢‘ 1%W)