THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1010 of 2010 ORDER: Petitioner is a field assistant. This Contempt Case is filed by him alleging that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court in the order, dated 30.04.2010, in Writ Petition No.10483 of 2010. The order passed by this Court reads as under: “If there is no order of suspension as on today against the petitioner, he shall be allowed to work in terms of his appointment order, up to 15th June 2010.” It is the case of the petitioner that in spite of aforesaid order, he was not allowed to work. Thus, the respondents have committed violation of the directions issued by this Court. Detailed counter-affidavit is filed by the third respondent – Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Chinnachinthakunta Mandal, Mahaboonagar District. In the counter-affidavit, while denying various allegations made by the petitioner, it is stated that during social audit, it was noticed that the petitioner has registered wrong musters for about 61 work I.D.s knowing that the persons shown in the musters did not work. It is also stated that an enquiry was conducted and it was found that the petitioner misappropriated an amount of Rs.2,24,910/-, as such, the Mandal Parishad Development Officer passed order, dated 28.04.2010, suspending the petitioner from service and it was also served on him. In view of order, dated 28.04.2010, passed suspending the petitioner from service, as averred in the counter-affidavit, the respondents rightly have not taken back the petitioner into service. In view of the same, it cannot be said that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court attracting the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. In that view of the matter, the Contempt Case is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th NOVEMBER, 2010. kvni