IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14217 of 2011 SUDESH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. On assurance to marry allegedly petitioner indulged in intercourse with the informant, a minor, is replied with opinion of the Doctor about her age in between 18-19 years. If she was aborted, it was her own act not admitted to this petitioner. Indulgence in sex on assurance of marriage is not allowed in Indian society. Breach of assurance if makes petitioner accused for committing rape is a mater of academic discussion. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 173 of 2010. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)