IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8376 of 2011 SRI KRISHNA NANDAN SINGH, SON OF LATE NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJDHAM, POLICE STATION MAHESHKUT, POLICE STATION GOGRI, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, HIGH EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 4. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 6. THE FINANCE OFFICER, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 7. THE PRINCIPAL, K.D.S. COLLEGE, GOGRI, KHAGARIA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 10.5.2011. Heard Mr. Naushad Uzzoha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sushil Kumar Jha, learned A.C. to G.P.18, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2/State and Shri Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3 to 6/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.7.1998 as University Professor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension, pay arrear of difference of pension, gratuity and Leave Encashment. Learned counsel for 2 the petitioner, while referring to Annexure-2 series, submits that petitioner has filed number of representations before the authority concerned. However, till date, no decision has been taken. It was further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondent no.4/Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University for aforesaid grievances within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, it is expected that respondent no.4 will examine the same in its right perspective and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.4 is required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. 3 With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)