IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15903 of 2009 1. RAJIV LOCHAN PANDEY 2. ASHUTOSH KUMAR PANDEY 3. KAPIL MUNI PANDEY 4. RAM CHANDRA PRASAD 5. RAM BHARAT DUBEY ------ Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that liability is fixed upon petitioners 1,2 and 3 who are father and sons and petitioners 4 and 5 who are deed writers that in collusion with each other they executed both the deeds. Earlier land was mutated while the subsequent land was attempted to be mutated its deed was snatched by them (accused persons) but reality is that in the year 2001 the father sold a piece of land which was in share of sons so, for consideration money of those sale deeds both sons that is petitioners 2 and 3 executed the deed of 2002, petitioner no.1 submitted that deed of 2001 should not be acted upon for which they have filed title suit which is pending awaiting its decision on merit but petitioners are apprehending their arrest which - 2 - in no case can be justified at the moment. I agree with the submission. Considering the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua, in Bhabua P.S.01 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI