IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1152 of 2010. Laxmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. … Petitioner. Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Haridwar, District Haridwar and others. …Respondents. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner-review applicant. Mr. P.C.Bisht, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondents. Date November 9, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Review Application No.819 of 2010) (Delay Condonation Application No. 8156 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This review application has been moved by the applicant- respondent no.2 for review of the order dated 7-7-2010 whereby it has been ordered that the recovery against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance provided the petitioner deposits Rs. One lakh fifty thousand before the recovery officer till the disposal of objection of the petitioner by respondent no.1. By this review application, the respondent no. 2 seeks modification of the order to the extent that the amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- deposited by the petitioner before recovery officer be permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent no.2. The review application is accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, which is supported by an affidavit. Delay in moving the review application is condoned. Delay condonation application stands allowed. 2 I have perused the order dated 7-7-2010, which was passed in presence of the learned counsel for the respondent no.2. No good ground is made out to review the order. The review application is accordingly rejected. However, the respondent no. 1-Assistant Labour Commissioner Haridwar is directed to expedite the proceeding of Section 6-H(1) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, within a period of one month from today and pass appropriate orders on the application of the review applicant-respondent no.2 for withdrawal of money. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP