CRM-M- No. 6238 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 6238 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 01.11.2011 Dayal Singh and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) None was present on behalf of the petitioners on 2.8.2011, however, matter was adjourned for today in the interest of justice. Even today none is present on behalf of the petitioners. By way of present petition petitioners have made following prayer:- “Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking exercise of extra-ordinary inherent jurisdiction of this Hon’ble High Court in directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to take appropriate action on F.I.R. No.62 dated 19.7.2010, under Sections 147,148,302 IPC, Police Station Sadar, Jagadhari towards lawful investigation including arrest of all the accused persons and to bring them under domain of law. Further, to quash the action of respondent no.3 to CRM-M- No. 6238 of 2011 (O&M) 2 introduce section 306 IPC in place of section 302 IPC particularly in view of the direct statement of eyewitness of the occurrence in the FIR itself arising out of the murder of Rakesh. Further, the investigation of the case be ordered to be transferred to some higher officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and the conduct of the respondent No.3 be deprecated in terms of pathetic attitude of the respondent No.3 in not effecting arrest of respondents No.4 to 13. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be also passed.” In view of the judgment titled as ‘Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others’, reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy to approach the Magistrate. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) November 1, 2011 Judge Anand