IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 RP.No. 149 of 2008(R) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.32495/2007 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP --------------------------------------------------- BAIJU, AGED 29, S/O. RAVEENDRAN, 'BIJU BHAVAN', NADACKAL CHERRY, KALLUVATHUKKAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN THE WP ---------------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI M.R. SABU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ R.P. 149 of 2008 in W.P.(C) 32495 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 11, 2008 ORDER The judgment was rendered considering the prayer made by the petitioner and directing that if the lorry has been seized and a crime has been registered, the matter shall be reported to the concerned magistrate. However, the review is filed and the request made by the counsel for the petitioner that the vehicle in question should be released to him pending further action. 2. I am not satisfied that the relief sought for can be granted in a review petition. Added to this, is the fact that the learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the 2nd respondent has already passed an order under Rule 27 of Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act and Rules, 2002. Review petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-