IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2007 / 20TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 30460 of 2006(A) -------------------------- OS.646/2005 of ADDL.M.C.,KOZHIKODE-II .................... PETITIONERS: (DEFENDANTS NOS.2 TO 5 IN O.S.NO.646/2005 BEFORE ----------------------THE MUNSIFF OF KOZHIKODE II A) 1. STANLY MOSES, S/O.SAMUEL THOTTIYIL, RESIDING AT CHEMBAKASSERI, MEETHAL, 28/3439, NELLICODE, CALICUT-16, NELLICKODE AMSOM DESOM. 2. JOY DAVID, S/O.SAMUEL THOTTIYIL, RESIDING AT CHEMBAKASSERI, MEETHAL, 28/3439, NELLICODE, CALICUT-16, NELLICKODE AMSOM, DESOM. 3. REJINA CHRISTABLE, D/O.SAMUEL THOTTIYIL, RESIDING AT CHEMBAKASSERI, MEETHAL, 28/3439, NELLICODE, CALICUT-16, NELLICKODE AMSOM DESOM. 4. NEENA GLADIS, D/O.SAMUEL THOTTIYIL, RESIDING AT CHEMBAKASSERI, MEETHAL, 28/3439, NELLICODE, CALICUT-16, NELLICKODE AMSOM DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.P.T.MOHANKUMAR SRI.A.AHZAR ..2/- ...2.... WPC.NO.30460/2006A RESPONDENTS: (PLAINTIFFS IN O.S.646/2005 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF ----------------------- OF KOZHIKODE II A): 1. MATTAYI SURENDRAN, S/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, MATTAYI HOUSE, NELLICKODE, KOZHIKODE. 2. MATTAYI RADHA, D/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 3. MATTAYI SHOBHANA, D/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 4. MATTAYI PRAKASAN, D/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 5. PASTRATE COMMITTEE, CSI CHURCH, PUTHIYARA, CALICUT, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KOTTOOLI AMSOM, PARAYANCHERI DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.BALACHANDRAN SRI.S.SHYAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... W.P.(C)No.30460 OF 2006 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 11th JULY, 2007 J U D G M E N T The registry reports that the final hearing of O.S.No.646 of 2005 was completed on 8.12.2006 and that the case was posted for judgment to 14.12.2006. 2. The learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4 submits that as a matter of fact the judgment was delivered decreeing the suit. The Writ Petition has obviously become infructuous and the same will stand dismissed on that basis. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0. -2-