1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 64. CA/3636/2009 In FAST/6002/2009 WITH CA/3637/2009 In FAST/6002/2009 WITH CA/3638/2009 In FAST/6018/2009 WITH CA/3639/2009 In FAST/6018/2009 WITH CA/3640/2009 In FAST/6007/2009 WITH CA/3641/2009 In FAST/6007/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Choudhary, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.C.Patil, Adv., h/f Mr. U.B.Bondar, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:3-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr.Chaudhari, and Mr. V.C.Patil, Counsel, for respective parties. 2 2. The Electricity Board feels aggrieved by the award recorded by the Ad hoc District Judge (I), Ambejogai, dt.1st July, 2008, in different Land Acquisition References and, particularly, LAR No.32/1989. In the process there is delay of 132/123 days is caused. After the judgment, application for certified copy was moved on 16th July, 2008. Copy was supplied on 21st August, 2008. Thereafter, proposal was required to be sent to the Head Office for filing First Appeal. At the Head Office decision taking process consumed time and, consequently, the delay. The delay is not exorbitant. Genuine efforts were made at higher level as to the possibility of filing appeal and as to whether the claim is to be accepted as a whole and, in the process of such deliberations, delay 132/123 is caused. It is sufficiently explained. Delay condoned. Each of the application for delay condonation allowed. Learned Counsel for respondent waives service in each of the 3 appeal for respondent nos. 2 and 3. Learned A.G.P. waives service for State. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/3636-09cagr