IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3 of 2000 Between: Central Institute of English & Foreign Languages(CIEFL) Schedule Cast Schedule TRIBE Employees WelfareAssociation Rep.By Its President, Tarnaka, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Registrar, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages(CIFEL), Hyderabad-500 007. 2 Govt. of India, Dept. of Education Rep.By Its Secretary , Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi. 3 National Commission for Schedule Castes and ScheduleTribes Rep.By Its Member, Staff Office, Ground Floor, Telugu Samkshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-500 028. 4 The University Grants Commission Rep.By Its Secretary, Bahadurshah Jafar Marg, New Delhi. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in proceedings with the process of selection for appointment by promotion to various categories in the Institute without following the prescribed roster and rules of reservation, as illegal discriminatory, arbitrary, unconstitutional being violative of Art. 14 and 16 also ultra vires of various Govt. Instructions, Memos and circulars orders with regard to rule of reservation and consequently set aside the various notification issued vide Notification No.CIFEL/Admn/F.361/Vol.15/99 dt: 23/12/1999 till such time the roster position in filing the posts reserved for Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe candidates is completely finalised and pass such other order or orders just and necessary in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.K.BALAGOPALP Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.RAMA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY W.P. M.P. No.3101 of 2009 and Writ Petition No.3 of 2000 ORDER: This W.P. M.P. is filed by the petitioner seeking permission for withdrawal of the Writ Petition. Leave is granted. Accordingly, W.P. M.P. is ordered and consequently the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If any fresh notification is issued without following the rule of reservation, it is open for the petitioner to approach this Court by filing a fresh application. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. Date : 26-02-2009. skmr