-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND AND AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.28 OF 2005 NO.28 OF 2005 NO.28 OF 2005 IN IN IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.87 OF 2004 NO.87 OF 2004 NO.87 OF 2004 Union of India, through the Deputy Sale Commissioner ...Petitioners v/s Mr Faiyaz Ahmed Azmatullah Shaikh and others ...Respondents Mr S.R. Rajguru i/b Mr S.S. Sarkar for Petitioners. Mr R.E. Dave i/b Mr N.N. Vaishnawa for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 6TH JULY 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing for respondents states that the letter of administration granted by this Court and for the revocation of which this petition has been filed cannot come in the way of the petitioners - Union of India to establish its title to the property in the suit that is filed by the union of India. The statement is accepted. In view of this statement, it is not necessary to proceed further with this petition. Petition is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. -------------