IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 1639 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 2, 2010 Gram Panchayat, Kharkali …Petitioner Versus Haryana State and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. R.S. Tacoria, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to serve legal notice by stating that the land which was not subject matter of acquisition in the notification dated 25.2.1977, issued under Section 4 read with Section 17(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) and notification dated 10.3.1977 issued under Section 6 of the Act, has also been un-authorisedly taken possession of. It may also be stated in the legal notice that no compensation in respect of the acquired land by the aforesaid notifications has been paid to the Gram Panchayat-peti- tioner. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in the aforesaid terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (AJAY TEWARI) February 2, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2