IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 338 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 338 OF 2002 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 889 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 889 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 889 OF 2002 Union of India and ors. .... Petitioners versus V.P.Bhoraskar ... Respondent. Mr. V.S. Masurkar with D.A.Dube i/b. S.S. Sarkar for the petitioners. Shri G.K.Masand with Ms. Rita Singh for the Respondent. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.R. V.R. V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. KINGAONKAR, JJ. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 27TH MARCH, 2006. 27TH MARCH, 2006. 27TH MARCH, 2006. P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. By these petitions the petitioner Union of India has challenged the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. 2. The only issue involved before the Tribunal and now before us was whether the notification or order issued by the State and made effective from a particular date becomes effective only from that date or can be made retrospectively operational. According to the learned counsel appearing for the Union of India, the question is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in State State State of Punjab & ors. Vs. Amar Nath Goyal and ors. of Punjab & ors. Vs. Amar Nath Goyal and ors. of Punjab & ors. Vs. Amar Nath Goyal and ors. reported reported reported in 2005 (2) S.C.Service Law Judgments Page in 2005 (2) S.C.Service Law Judgments Page in 2005 (2) S.C.Service Law Judgments Page 177. 177. 177. 3. We have scrutinised the orders impugned in this petition and it appears from those orders that the tribunal on each occasion has relied on an earlier judgment of the tribunal without giving particulars or finding as to the issue involved in this case for the purpose of this case. In our opinion, therefore interest of justice would be made if the impugned order is set aside and the matter be remitted back to the tribunal for deciding afresh in accordance with the law as far as possible within three months from the date of this order. Both the petitions accordingly are disposed of. xxxx