HIGH OOURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BIIASPUR WrW: Petition fS) No. 2&6jrf 2007 Petjttoner &nt. Prabha U sf Aged about 48 Years, W/o. Shri P,S. Uikey, Assistant Teacher, GovL Girls Aashram Bade Dum^r Pali, Btock Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Vereus Respondents l. State of Chhattlsgarti, Through Secretary, Schoot Eduiation Department, D.K.S. Bawan, Ralpur(C.G.) 2. The Dftwtor Pubte Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Offlcer Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Btock Educatton OlTicer Khaisia (C.G.5 5. Assistant Commisstoner Tribal Wetfare Department, Ralgarh Distt. Ralgarti (C.G.) Wrtt BdtHion under Arttete 226 cf the Constitution oflndia Singte Bench; Hm'bte Mr. Justte SaUsh K. Agnihotri. Present; Mr, Anit Mourya, Advocate for e petttoner, Mr. Arvlnd Dubey, Panel Lawyerfor the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 7"' Cay of May, 2007) (yiash 1. The qu%tton of law wwohred hereln fe asto whether the petttioner is entftted to reguter pay scate w.e.f. the date of hitial appotntment or from the date of comptetion of probation period. 2. Leamed counset appearing for the p^UUoner ^ well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fads and qu^tlon of law invohfed In the present wrlt petitlon are the same to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (SushB Tnwari and ottens vs, State Govemment of Chhattisgarh & others), which was altowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of the above-stated submissior» made by teamed counsel for the parties, the writ petitton Is allowed in the same terms. No order as to c(»ts. Sd/- , SatishK.Agnihdtri Judge 'v