3i% cogg' a? CHHA"mscat;.RH:§ILA§Egg Writ Rekii‘éon §$i hit). MS? af was Petitioggg; Ami Kumar Tigga, aged about 38 years, son of $hri SHas Ticgai accupaticn Asst, Teachar, 8035 Pnmary Aashram (Sagibhawgw), Vikas Khand Karmabet, Di tt‘ Jashpur {3G}. gersaa; A“ V Resgondems State of Chhaitisgarh thraugh the Secretary, Department 9f Tribaf Weffare: Dau Kaéyan Singh, Bhawans Raipur (CG), 2) The Deputy Sachiv‘ Depariment of Tribai Weifare (CG) Dam Kaiyan Singhh Bhawan, Mantrafaya, ’ Raipur 3) Ccmmisséoher, Deptt. of Tribai Welfare, Pt. Ravishankar University Premises, Raipur (CG), LP; CeHecton Di’stt. Jashwr {C ) 5) The Assistant Commissioner, Deptt 0f Tribal Weifare} Jashpur (CG). 6) The B£ock Educatém Oman Ebck Kansabsf, Déstt‘ Jashpur(CG). (Writ Petitiorf. under Anticée 226 of the Canstétuticn of lndia) SB: Hon’bie iVir. Saiish K. Agnihctri, J. Shri AN. Bhakta, ccunsekfor'the petitmneri SM Arum Sa Gevt Advacate farthe State. Presenti ORAL ORDER ' ’7 (Passeaé on 13"“ day of Augg$t;_ 2mg) With the censent 9f ieamed ccunsei appearing fer the partées, the pe£iticn is heard finaiiy‘ 1) Learned counse: appearing for the petitéoner eubmits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition or: merits at this stage. However‘ the petitioner prays that the representation dated 15-7—2008 (Annexure PB; pending before the concerned authorities may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw, within the prescribed time ‘2) Shri Aron Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submitsthat there is no reason why the oer: ing'representation shouid not be decided by the concerned authority, expedttiousty. 3) in view of the foregoing, the petitton is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to consider and decide the representation as stated above, in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, as earty as possibie, preterabiy Within a period _ of twc weeks from the date of receipt ct‘ a copy of this order. iitr, 3ao further submits c that no caercive steps shat! be taken against the petitioner‘ til! the dispesai of the {epresentation 4) i hope and trust that the State Govemment shall examine the repre3entaticn cbjectiveiy in accordance with &aw and guideiines, %ssued by the Government time to time. 5) in View of ihe abave, LANofI aksc etands dispcsed of. Sd/- ‘ Satish K Agnihotri ‘k Judge