IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4572 of 2010 RAM NARESH PRASAD & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3. 22.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the Opposite parties. A show cause is stated to have been filed on behalf of opposite party No. 5 on 20.6.2011 after serving copy on the petitioner. The same is not available on the record. The office shall place it on record. The Court therefore requested Counsel for the State to make available his copy for perusal so as not to hold up the proceeding. The Court on perusal of the cause shown is satisfied that the opposite parties had taken adequate steps for filling up the regular sanctioned posts by publication of advertisement, receipt and scrutiny of applications, preparation of a select list, inviting objection against the select list and have stated in no uncertain terms in Para 7 that they propose to complete the process by June 2011. Counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the petitioners have also applied. However it is not known whether the petitioners have been selected or not. He therefore prays for an adjournment to bring those facts on record. Once the advertisement has been published and the petitioners had also applied and a select list has been prepared, if the petitioners have any perceived grievance against their non selection, their remedy lies in afresh application. The Court is not persuaded to keep the present matter pending as submitted on behalf of the petitioners. The contempt application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)