IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 331 of 2000 RAJESH KUMAR VERMA V/S UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Mr. VIJAY MEHTA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. VK MATHUR, for the respondent Date of Order : 6.8.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI GOVIND MATHUR,J. ORDER ----- By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the services of the petitioner have been terminated as per the conditions of service mentioned in appointment order itself. The appeal is filed challenging this on the ground that the petitioner was never shown, as to on what ground his services were sought to be terminated. It would suffice to say that from Annex.2 and 3 if read together, it is clear that according to para 3 of Annex.2, the petitioner was appointed on probation for a period of two years. This Annex.2 is dated 6.11.1998, and obviously probationer's services could be dispensed with any time during probation, apart from the fact that the petitioner's services have been dispensed with after giving one month's notice as appears from Annex.3, which is of April 1999. In our view, thus the impugned order does not suffer from any error requiring interference in appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/