ssp 1 WP(L) 2866 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2866 OF 2010 M/s.Aaraaish Developers & Anr. .....Petitioners versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.V.A.Thorat, Senior Advocate i/by Ms.Prachi Tatake, for the petitioners. Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.S.P.Thorat, for respondent No.3. Mr.J.S.Saluja, AGP, for respondent No.4. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 18th FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation states that the petitioners may make appropriate representation to the Corporation pointing out that the decision taken on 30-10-2010 may not be applicable to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the new policy which came into effect from 07-04-2008 is not applicable to the petitioners since their case is governed by the old policy. 2. Petitioners are permitted to make appropriate representation in this behalf to the respondent No.2 taking all the points which are taken in the petition and such representation may be made within a period of two weeks from today. If such representation is made, ssp 2 WP(L) 2866 of 2010 the Corporation shall take appropriate decision in accordance with law and while taking the decision, all relevant facts may be taken into consideration and the representation may be decided within a period of four weeks from the receipt of representation from the petitioners. Till the decision is taken on the representation of the petitioner, the Corporation shall not take any further action on the basis of the demand notice dated 30-10-2010. If the petitioner has any grievance about the decision so taken by the Corporation, it will be open to the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings in that behalf. 3. In view of what is stated above, writ petition is disposed of. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )