IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4118 of 2009 Date of Decision : May 25, 2010. Jaswinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.P.K.Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the selection of respondent Nos.3 & 4 on the posts of Multi-purpose Health Workers (Female) in the reserved category of Physically Challenged Persons. It is alleged that respondent Nos.3 & 4 are not physically challenged persons and have been wrongly selected. The official respondents have filed their counter-affidavit in which it is averred that though the petitioner did not appear at the time when the interviews were held on 16.10.2008, never-the-less, her complaints made through her father on the question of genuineness of the handicap certificate produced by respondent No.3 have been considered C.W.P.No .4118 of 2009 2 and Medical Board comprising three members was constituted to assess the physical disability of respondent No.3. As per the report of the Medical Board (Annexure R-2), the physical disability certificate (Annexure R-3) produced by respondent No.3 has been found to be genuine as she suffers with 45% hearing impairment from left ear. Similarly, the medical certificate (Annexure R-4) produced by respondent No.4 has also been found to be genuine. In view of the above-stated categoric stand taken by the respondents which has not been controverted by the petitioner by filing any rejoinder or any proof etc., no case to interfere with the selection of respondent Nos.3 & 4 is made out. Dismissed. May 25, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE