IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42400 of 2009 UDAY KUMAR "UDAY", S/o Dilchand Rai alias Dilchand Prasad Singh, R/o village Chakiari, P.S. Raja Pakar, District Vaishali …. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opp. Party For the petitioner: Mr. A.K.Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ---- 2 9.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 307 and 333 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he was not apprehended from the spot rather his name was allegedly disclosed by the co-accused Dilip Singh and on that basis he has been named in the first information report. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 6.8.2009. It is also stated that he did not had knowledge of the case and nor had the police remanded him in this case when he was taken in custody either in 1993 or subsequently in 1999. Learned counsel for the State submitted that petitioner is a veteran criminal and is an accused in several - 2 - cases including a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is further submitted that this is a case of the year 1993, whereas the petitioner has surrendered in 2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case in view of the fact that petitioner is the named accused in this case which was lodged in 1993 and has surrendered in 2009 and also the fact that his past records are also not clean, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. However, if so advised the petitioner may renew of his prayer of bail after six months. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) -----------