IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1262 of 2008 Ashok Kumar …..…….. Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, Chief Justice Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Judge Present: Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Beena Pande, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 4. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 5. Date of Decision: 05.04.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 5 states, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact, that the petitioner has already been relieved, so as to enable him to join his assignment in the successor State of Uttar Pradesh. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel representing respondent Nos. 3 and 5, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J. ) 05.04.2010 P.Singh