IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2007 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 3389 of 2004(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ T.R. NATARAJAN, S/O. K.K. RAGHAVAN, AGED 43 YEARS, ARMED POLICE ASST.SUB INSPECTOR SRAF PANDIKKAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.GIRI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ARMED POLICE BATTALION, POLICE TRAINING COLLEGE, THYCAUD, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMANDANT, K.A.P.F. BATTALION, RAMAVARMAPURAM CAMP, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C)No.3389/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4-3-1999 IN O.P.NO.11310/95 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30-4-1999 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30-10-2002 IN W.A.NO.1738/1999 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CONT. CASE NO.1170/2003 DATED 31-10-2003 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE A. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14-8-2003. / TRUE COPY / P.S.TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.3389 of 2004 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2007 JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding respondents to give promotions to the petitioner on the strength of the seniority enjoyed by him in the cadre of Assistant Sub Inspector of Police as on 1-8-1992; b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding respondents to grant all the benefits, including pay revision with retrospective effect, arrears of salary and salary during suspension period; c) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the first respondent to dispose of Ext.P2 representation in the light of Exts.P1 and P3 judgments, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. It is seen from the statement that steps are being taken to grant the benefits to the petitioner. In case no action has been taken on Ext.P2, there will be a direction to the first respondent to take appropriate action on Ext.P2 and disburse the eligible benefits within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg.