IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2010 / 25TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16188 of 2005(B) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ KAMALAKSHI. K., W/O.LATE P.MADHAVAN, MANALAYIL HOUSE, KALARCODE P.O., ALAPPUZHA-3. *SUPPEL . PETITIONERS 2 TO 7 IMPLEADED. 2. RAJAMMA, D/O. LATE KAMALAKSHU, AGED 64, VELLAPALLY VEEDU, WARD NO.IV, PUNNAPRA VILLAGE, AMBALAPUZHA NORTH PANCHAYAT, VANDANAM MURI, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. VIJAYAN, S/O. LATE KAMALAKSHI, AGED 59, VIJAYA NIVAS, PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, WARD NO.29, PALLATHURUTHY MURI, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY, ALAPPUZHA , PIN. 688 003. 4. RADHAMMA, D/O. LATE KAMALAKSHI, AGED 57, DO. DO. 5. LEELAMMA, D/O. LATE KAMALAKSHI, AGED 57, THEKKE THAYYIL VEEDU, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, WARD NO.IV, KALARCODE MURI, PUNNAPRA NORTH PANCHYAT, ALAPPUZHA. 6. MOHANDAS, S/O. LATE KAMALAKSHI, AGED 54, MANALLEL VEEDU, PALLATHURUTHY MURI, PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, WARD NO.29, ALAPPUZHA MUNICIPALITY , ALAPPUZHA. 7. KUSUMAKUMARI, D/O. LATE KAMALAKSHI, AGED 46, KIZHAKKAE THAYYIIL VEEDU, WARD NO.15, KATTOOR MURI, PATHIRAPPALLY VILLAGE, MARARIKULAM SOUTH VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA. *SUPPLEMENTARY PETITIONERS 2 TO 7 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 14.9.07 IN I1. 12176/07. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SATHEESH W.P.(C) NO.16188/2005 RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, FREEDOM FIGHTERS' DIVISION, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI-110 003. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTEED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (FFP.A) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY, CGC R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 16188 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is no more and the cause of action does not survive. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as abated. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/