1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4293/2006 (Sanjay Dadarao Ugemuge Versus The State of Maharashtra, thro. Its Secretary & others) Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.P. Palshikar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, Asstt. Government Pleader for the R-1. Mr. P.V. Thakre, counsel for the respondent no.3. CORAM :D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED :DECEMBER 19, 2007. Heard Mr. Palshikar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Khubalkar, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1 and Mr. Thakre, the learned counsel for the respondent no.3. The counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the petitioner was serving initially in the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. However, at a later point of time, he was transferred to Zilla Parishad, Wardha, and therefore, the authorities refused to consider the length of service rendered by the petitioner in both these Zilla Parishad for the purpose of grant of time scale promotion. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this 2 aspect has been considered by this Court in the decision rendered in Writ Petition No.2732/2001, dated 24.03.2005 and seeks permission to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Wardha for redressal of the grievance in the light of the above referred decision. Mr. Thakre, the learned counsel for the respondent no.3, Zilla Parishad, Wardha, states that the representation of the petitioner would be considered on its own merits according to law as well as in the light of the decision of this Court referred to hereinabove (if applicable) and decision on the said representation shall be taken at the earliest. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE APTE