IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1923 of 2008 RAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV Versus SHEO SAWARI KUNWAR & ORS ----------- 3. 21.11.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court when an application restoring the suit has been allowed this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the same especially when the court has given three reasons, namely, (i) the original records were not available in the court, (ii) there was illness in the family of the plaintiff- opposite parties and (iii) in the deposition of the petitioner witness no.1 had stated that he had no objection to restoration of the suit. In the opinion of this Court any of the three grounds was good enough for allowing the prayer for restoration of the suit and when all three of them were pressed and were found to be correct, the approach of the court below of restoring the suit cannot be said to be vitiated by any jurisdictional error. That being so, this Court would not find any merit in this application, which is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)