IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.11133 of 2011 Between: Nooti Rama Krishna … Petitioner and The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and another … Respnodents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.11133 of 2011 ORDER: Questioning inaction on the part of the respondents in reinstating the petitioner into service in pursuance of the orders passed in W.P. No.7274 of 2011 and batch and also in pursuance of the Award passed in LCID. No.17 of 2011, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Badli Filler on a compassionate ground in the respondents Company in the month of October, 1984. While so, he was issued charge sheet dated 28.07.1987 alleging unauthorized absenteeism and eventually he was orally terminated from service vide Proceedings dated 02.01.1990. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed L.C.I.D. No.17 of 2011 and the learned Tribunal on 24.10.2011 though no positive order was passed but disposed of the said I.D. with some observations. Thereafter, similarly situated matters were referred to Lok Adalath wherein it was ordered for reinstatement into service afresh without any continuity of service and past service. While so, the management filed W.P. No.7274 of 2001 and batch and this Court on 23.06.2010 while disposing of the writ petitions directed the management to re-engage the services of workmen. Thereafter, the petitioner stated to have made a representation dated 08.08.2010 to the respondents requesting to reinstate him into service in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court in the said batch of writ petitions and no orders are passed on the said representation. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that assailing the award passed by the learned Tribunal, the management had filed batch of writ petitions but no writ petition was filed against the award passed by the learned Tribunal in respect of the petitioner. It is also submitted that after disposing of the batch of writ petitions, the petitioner made a representation dated 08.08.2010 requesting the authorities to reinstate him into service but the respondents authorities in stead of reinstating the petitioner into service refused to initiate action on the said representation stating that he is not a party in a batch of writ petitions. He also submitted that pursuant to the order passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitions similarly situated persons were reinstated into service. Therefore, the petitioner is also entitled to similar benefit. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner was removed from service long back and the learned Tribunal did not grant any relief in respect of the petitioner except observation but however, he was reinstated into service and later on again he was removed from service. Therefore, he is not entitled to any relief. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner categorically mentioned that the petitioner made a representation dated 08.08.2010 and the respondents are not passing any orders thereon. But, however, on a perusal of the record, no such representation is filed as one of material papers. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, this writ petition can be disposed of as under. The petitioner is given liberty to make a representation, as no representation dated 08.08.2010, stated to have been filed by the petitioner, is available, within a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and within a period of four weeks thereafter, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Date: 23.12.2011 LSK