IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45226 of 2010 JALESH MAHTO S/O ARJUN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 461,379, and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 2.8.2010 for recovery of six allegedly stolen mobiles and there is only one other case pending against him, which fact will be verified by the court below, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 214/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be local in nature since the petitioner belongs to Begusarai and the other bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change 2 in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)