1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 916 OF 2008 Mrs.Hemlata Harishchandra Morje. ..... ..... Petitioner. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Police & Ors. ..... ....... Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Sorankar for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Hingorani, APP, for the Respondents. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED : 7TH JULY, 2008. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The case is pending investigation in FIR No.604/07. The report has been filed by the petitioner and the police has already registered a case. Now the petitioner wants certain offences to be added by the police for the purpose of investigation, which she has mentioned in her report. It is well settled law that during the process of investigation, no authority can interfere and should not interfere in the investigative process. However, if the investigating authority fails to investigate properly, there are remedies available to the petitioner. 2 3. The petition is misconceived and is dismissed, accordingly. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)