^SET^iyirto, y-al'H'Ko, Rrtl-dy *fl*1cl>l ^m^ ...^.r.^...^^--- w^ 200^ 311^91 <RTR-<Jtt) ?rai3T[^naiirt<R an^sr cracp (tjcif^ci^) ?^aTW:;?ifei3n^sT PETITIONER Chittr^njan Prasad Choudhary, S/o Late Narayan Prasaip Choudhary, aged about 22 years, R/o Viiiag^ Nandeli, P^st Office Chikhali, Tahsi! & Distt. ^aigarh (CG) Vers RESPONDENTS Stai? & Raipuif ^)f Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Health Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, 1 (CG) Fsirtiily 2. Sfate Heaithl Bhaw^n 5. 6. Union trainin; Reorg MarRs (Wnt PetitiQn under Articl Shri Sanjay Patel, coun; Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Ac 4 and 5. S'nri Ajay Barik, Advocal Standing Counsei for Unson of (hl<lfri41'l *111ril'4'ls'<Il •<|ul'(-si'< 2R gif^q an^ST s of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary & Famiiy Welfare Department, Vallabh Bhopal (M.P.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (CG) 4. Direct^r, Heafth Services, Raigarh, (CG) Chief ^edical and Health Officer, Raigarh (CG) of India, Through Director, Parsonnel , Public grievances & Pension (State nisatoin Celi) LokNayak Bhawan, Khan New Deihi. 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Advocate for the petitioner. for the State/respondents No.1, 3, ', appears on behaif of Shri S.K. Beriwal, idia/respondant No.6. / .^' <p ^. I, '' •^'"'.'^i-'' ;;£"•-Ll ®-1|C-78 ^EET;:WnOTT, u>-nl'(l<l<»;firtitiy *l l*tc»l^TT^ 3II^ST<RTRrli* tTSfT3II^?1sCTt<P 3I1^?T tRip (ijclijd.g) W^ 200 5Tai8R ^rf^T Sd^ST — ^ compass|onate ofetiti thle Heard. By this petition, the respondents to give reguiar post. The grievance of the. .p^til was working as N.M.A. at under the control of the petitioner moved an appiicaticjn has not been considered by th| Learned counse! for petjtioner died in the year year 2005, hence the petition (J< delay. The State Governmeijit appointment to the dependent^ 2000 and to this effect circul Government on 10-6-2005. It is settled !aw that descent. Appointment on favour of the chiidren or other rendering service. Appointmejnt for meeting the immedlate reason of the death of the on compassionate ground, it Mndhra, resbondents. thl'!<fd4)H *1HriTtTTs'<3 '((uiwit ^3lf^T3II^?T petitioner is seeking direction to the appoifflment to the petitioner in She ioner is that the father of the petitioner i, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh He died on 18-5-1993. The for compassionate appointment but that authorities. State submitted that the father of the 199^ whereas the petltion has been flted in the leserves to be dismissed on the ground of had decided to provide compassionate dent^ of those employees who died after 1-11- l^r has already been issued by the State ^ubiic empioyment cannot be given on c<)mpassionate ground is an exception in ^•elatives ofthe employees, who died while on compassionate ground is given oniy h]ardship whlch is faced by the famiiy by bre|ad earner. When an appointment is made s|iould be kept confined only to the purpose r1. —'|l-|lG-78 ^cET -01<11WA|, y^1<frl<l<»,Rrtl'Hy *l 1*101 ^tTT^ 3IT^»T<IiTR-)i* asiTaTr^sigiqra! Ban/e an^^Tq^p (^iljei^) ^200 ?»aT8R^Tfia 3D^9T •3 it seeks to achieve, the compassion. In the instant case, it i^ died in the year 1 993 where^s year 2005. Thus conslderjng counsel for the State as alsol no direction for grant of comptsss be issued by this Court. A|i substance is hereby dismisse|J. <ni<iln«li»ii*inV^'ls'<l'(Kiitcit ^3lf^T3TI^ST dea being not to provide fcr endless not in dispute that father of the petitioner the Instant petltion has been fi!ed in the the arguments advanced by learned the settled principles of law in this regard, ionate appointment to the petitioner can ccordingiy, the petition being without any Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge