// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1184/2008 Indras S/o late Kurdaram and Another Versus Heeralal S/o Nathuram and Others Date of Order ::: 18.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Ms. Arti Sharma, Advocate, for Shri Ashvin Garg, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners filed a suit in the trial court along-with an application for temporary injunction, which was dismissed by the trial court; being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred, but without success; hence this writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the plaintiff. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners in the light of reasons assigned by both the courts below for rejecting the application for temporary injunction. Both the courts below have recorded a concurrent finding about prima- facie case, balance of convenience and // 2 // irreparable injury against the plaintiff and in favour of the defendants. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said finding so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//