WP(C) 4013/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. H. Phukan, lea rned Addl. State counsel for the State respondents. Mr. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the report of the Ci rcle Officer, Barnagar Revenue Circle, Sorbhog, dated 19/8/09 in which it is ind icated that upon necessary enquiry it is found that Pachim Khudnabari Pathar Par ghat falls within the jurisdiction of Chakchaka Anchalik Panchayat but on earlie r occasion, in reported dated 13/8/09 a favourable order was passed in favour of the petitioner. Both the reports are found to be contradictory and accordingly the petitioner has filed an application in the form of an appeal before the Depu ty Commissioner, Barpeta, for necessary adjudication of the matter. Whether the aforesaid Pachim Khudnabari Pathar Parghat falls within the jurisdic tion of Chakchaka Anchalik Panchayat is to be determined on the basis of factual assessment to which the Deputy Commissioner is well equipped with. Accordingly, as prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction t hat learned Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta, shall dispose of the appeal/representa tion filed by the petitioner on 29/8/09 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 3(three) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid order, this writ petition stands disposed of.