% / €vm¥ ’ @ G (IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAS?UR (CHHATTISGARH) b wan! PETiTIonmo$7€u5f2oo3 / PETITIO§ER Dr.Ra eav Prakash Sen, Sfo. suraj Prasad Sen Aged about 32 yearS, R/Q. Khelbhata, Irrigation Calony, / j Sarangarh, District r Raigarh, Chhatti §arh “1:? VERSUS //%. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Thé Secretary Govt. of Chhattisgarh Deptt of Panchayat,;DKS Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur, Chhattisgafh. RESPOKDENTS Parmanand Nayak, President Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Tikeshwar Singh, Additional Tahsildar Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Kulmani Vishwal, R/o. Village Nadigaan, Block Baramkela, TehSil Sarangarh, Distri ct Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Khiteshwar Dadsena, R/o. Bade—Navapara, Block Earamkela, Tehsil Saranqarh District Raiéarh: ChhattiSgarh‘ 6. Dr. Tilak Ram Patel, '// S/o. Pani Ram Patelf R/o. Village Khorigaon, Block Baramkela, Tehail Sarangarh, oistrict Raigarh, Chhattisqarh. ; 7m @ Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhatti$garh. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh‘ Dr. Ashvini Sharma, Superintendent Cum V District Ayurved Officer, Raigarh, District Raigégk? Chhattisgarh . f Ganga Prasad ichowdhary, Rfo. Village Kumerhi, Block Raramkela, Tehsil Saranqarh, DiStrict Raigafh, Chhattisgarh. K.K. Swarnkar, S/a. T.P. Swarnkar, Dealing Clerk of Sambida Chikitsa Niyukti, Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Shakrajeet Nayak, Minieter of Irrigation, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Cellector Raigarh Chhattisgarh //” WRIT PETITION UIWDER ARTICLE 226f'227 OF THE" COESTITUTION OF INDIA grmewigm/W WRIT PETITION No. 3785 of‘ 2003 , 3" Amit 9?? 6Q\ §‘) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR v PETITIONER Dr. Rajeev Prakash Sen. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’ w, L SB: Hon’ble Slm' Satish K. Agnihom. J. ff Present: Shri Ali Asgar, Advocate for the petiticner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 & 13. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 15 day of September, 2009) 1. The case has been listed today before this CouIT for orders on default. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instructions. Shri Ali further submits that he has already given “No Objection Certificate” to the petitioner on his request. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above: the matter is dismissed for default and non-prosecution. M , " . I Sdl- i _ garish K. Agnihotn \ ‘ Judgell