IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31815 of 2009 BHRIGUNATH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections- 4 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act. Alleging false implication it is submitted that he is in custody since 4.6.2009. His bail has been rejected on 1.8.2009 and till that date neither has the seized bomb been produced as an exhibit in the court below, mandatory under the Code of Criminal Procedure, nor is there any forensic report available of the items allegedly seized. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah in connection with Azimabad P.S. Case No.21/2009. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)