Ndm 1 revn.191.08.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2008 Gopal Bholanath Pardeshi. ... APPLICANT Vs. Bharti Gopal Pardeshi and ors. ... RESPONDENTS -------------- Mr. Vikas Shivarkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for State. -------------- CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 9 th September, 2009. P.C. 1 This Revision Application is filed by the Applicant – Husband challenging the order of the learned Judge of the Family Court, Pune dated 31 st October, 2007 passing the order of payment of maintenance of Rs.1,500/- to the Respondent-Wife, Rs.1,500/- to Respondent-Daughter and to pay Rs.1,000/- towards costs of the Petition. The Applicant has filed divorce petition on the ground of cruelty stating that the Respondent -Wife was always interested in staying in her parental home and not willing to lead family life with the Petitioner. The said petition was Ndm 2 revn.191.08.sxw dismissed by the Family Court by the Judgment dated 03 rd January, 2003 and at that time the issue of the maintenance was not decided with hope that the parties may clear the differences and reside together. However, the parties continued to staying separately and so the Petition for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed before the Family Court, Pune. 2 The learned Judge, Family Court, Pune has discussed this issue and also has considered the evidence produced by the Respondent-Wife that the Applicant runs a fish shop and has income not less than Rs.6,000/- per month. Considering this evidence, the learned Judge of the Family Court has passed a correct order. No need to interfere in the order of the maintenance passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court. The Revision Application is dismissed in limine. [ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ]