IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 11TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 5427 of 2004(U) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ KANDATHIL LAKSHMI, W/O. KANNAN, LAKSHMI NIVAS, POST MAYYIL, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. . RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY CHEIF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B., ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, VALAPATTANAM. 3. T.V. MUHAMMED KUNHI, S/O. IBRAHIM, CONVENOR, JANAKEEYA SAMITHI, PARAPPURAM- PERUMACHERY ROAD, MAYYIL. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KANNUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU FOR R1 & R4 ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN, SC, KSEB FOR R2 SRI.K.V.SOHAN FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON,J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 5427 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “(a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order calling for the records leading to Ext.P3 and quash the same. (b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation and restrain the 2nd respondent to take any steps for shifting the electric post from its existing position. (c) declare that there are civil suits pending between the parties about the disputed property and hence Ext.P3 order for shifting the electric post is not permissible at this time. (d) grant such other reliefs prayed for from time to time including cost of this proceedings.” 2. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that the petitioner has already sold the property and that the matter has become infructuous. However, there is no representation for the petitioner. In the said circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE ttb