IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9657 of 2008 SANJEEV BHAGAT @ SANJEEV KUMAR BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.5.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that the informant told her son that some miscreants had dragged his father away. The son of the informant went at the spot and saw 4-5 persons dragging away his father. The petitioner has been made accused on the basis of the statement given by Jagdish Sada and Brahamdeo Sada in which they have said that the petitioner was having in illicit affair with the wife of Chamru Sada and for which there was a Panchayati and the deceased was one of the Panches. It is alleged that the petitioner had threatened the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that such type of evidence that has come is very weak and there is no connection with the actual occurrence and the evidence. It is also submitted that the informant had seen three persons who were dragging away his father but he does not name the petitioner. Be that as it may, the petitioner, Sanjeev Bhagat @ Sanjeev Kumar Bhagat is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Sonbersa P.S.Case No. 73 of 2007. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)