-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2237 OF 2008 Ankush Natha Shelar : Petitioner V/s. Rupi Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Ors. : Respondents ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2263 OF 2008 Ankush Natha Shelar : Petitioner V/s. Rupi Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.P.B.Shah for the petitioners. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos.2 to 5. ... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : APRIL 02, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Shah, the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Both these petitions are filed by the same person and there is a common grievance. The Divisional Joint -: 2 :- Registrar is right in holding that the revision would not be proceeded unless the mandatory requirement of 50% deposit is complied with. Therefore, no fault can be found with the said order in these petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution. 3. However, the petitioners are granted six weeks’ time to comply with the requirement of 50% deposit and if the deposit is so made within the stipulated period, the Respondent no.3 will restore the Revision Application and decide the same in accordance with law. 4. The Writ Petitions stand disposed of. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.