1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3847 OF 2010 (Sk. Mukhatyar & Sons vs. The Dy. Commissioner (Supply) Amravati & Anr.) with WRIT PETITION NO. 3848 OF 2010 (Sk. Mukhatyar & Sons vs. The Dy. Commissioner (Supply) Amravati & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 01, 2010. Heard Shri Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Fulzele and Shri Joshi, learned AGPs in respective writ petitions for the respondents. Shri Mirza, learned counsel has tried to point out that the material on the basis of which action has been taken against the establishment of the petitioner as Semi Wholesale dealer, does not pertain to him at all. The learned AGPs have pointed out that the Deputy Commissioner (Supply) has only rejected interim prayer and appeal is still pending. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to go into the merits of the controversy. Respondent No. 1 – appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal itself on merits as early as possible and in any case within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order to it. The parties to appear before Respondent No. 1 on 14th September 2010 and to abide by his further directions in the matter. 2 Writ Petitions are disposed of accordingly with this direction. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.