IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2009 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 65 of 2005() --------------------------- OP.1007/2001 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... APPELLANT : PETITIONER ------------------------ MARTIN CHACKO, S/O.T.V.CHACKO, THEKKETHALA HOUSE, KORATTY EAST P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SUNIL SMT.JULI PETER RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT : -------------------------------- MOLLY JOSEPH, D/O.LATE JOSEPH, VAZHAPPILLY HOUSE, CHENGAL POST, KALADY. ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- C.M.Application No.480 of 2005 & Mat.Appeal No. 65 OF 2005 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009 O R D E R/ J U D G M E N T Basant, J. There is no representation for the appellant or the respondent. When the matter came up on 30.10.2009 also, the same was the situation. We had indicated that if there is no representation, it will be assumed today that the parties are not interested in prosecuting this appeal. We draw that irresistible inference now. The petition for condonation of delay and the appeal are dismissed for non-prosecution. R.BASANT, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn