IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8200 of 2010 AMERICAN MAHTO, SON OF SRI CHANDESHWAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 366(A), 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the complaint has been filed after an undue delay and from the narrative of the same it appears to be a case of consent between the parties, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 12.9.2008 and has no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. 1st, Siwan, in Sessions Trial No. 537 of 2008 arising out of Goreakothi P.S. Case No. 58 of 2008 (Complaint Case No. 1414 of 2008) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty - 2 - to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)