IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2751 of 2005 INDU DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 08. 18.03.2011 Prayer of the petitioner in the Writ Application was allowed vide Order, dated 30.08.2006. However, Respondent No. 9 challenged the order mainly on the ground that the order was passed behind her back without issuing notice to her, though she had been impleaded as Respondent No. 9 in the Writ Application. Thereafter the Writ Application was listed on 31.07.2009. Jointly prayer was made by the parties for its adjournment to 24.07.2009. On 28.07.2009, when the matter was taken up, no one appeared on behalf of Respondent No. 9. On three occasions, the matter was adjourned. Finally on 28.07.2009, when no one appeared on behalf of Respondent No. 9, an order was passed, whereby a direction was issued restraining Respondent No. 9 to discharge her duties on the post of Anganbari Sevika at Anganbari Kendra, Purvi Harijan Tola, Ramchandrapur, Itahari from 28.07.2009 until further orders. The District Magistrate, Banka was also directed to consider the case of the petitioner for being appointed on the 2 post of Anganbari Sevika, occupied by Respondent No. 9. Today, when the matter was taken up no one appears for the petitioner as well as for Respondent No. 9. However, counsel for the State is present. This Writ Application is being disposed of in terms of Order dated 28.07.2009, whereby the District Magistrate, Banka was directed to consider the case of the petitioner for being appointed on the post of Anganbari Sevika, restraining the Respondent No. 9 from discharging the duties on that post of Anganbari Sevika. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. SKM (Mridula Mishra, J.)