IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7277 of 2009 Udeshwar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 04. 23.08.2011 Petitioner had filed this application for quashing of an order, contained in Memo No. 4270, dated 08.11.2008, issued by the District Superintendent of Education, Madhubani, whereby his payment of salary had been stopped in compliance of the direction of the District Magistrate, Madhubani. The District Magistrate, Madhubani had directed for withholding of petitioner’s salary on the ground that one Urmila Devi, claiming to be the first wife of petitioner, filed an application before the District Magistrate that petitioner has stopped maintaining his first wife and son and illegally solemnized second marriage after entering into the service. No Departmental Proceeding has been initiated against the petitioner. Simply a direction had been issued by the District Magistrate for withholding petitioner’s salary. I. A. No. 5641 of 2011 has been filed by Urmila Devi as the Intervention Application with a prayer to implead her as Respondent in this Writ Application. From the Intervention Application, it transpires that Smt. Urmila Devi has also filed Maintenance Case No. 70 of 2 2008, before the Family Court, Madhubani for payment of maintenance amount with effect from Augsut 2008. The Maintenance Case has been disposed of and she has been allowed payment of maintenance with effect from the date of filing of the case i.e., August, 2008 and the present Intervention Application has been filed for the period prior to filing of the Maintenance Case. There is no sufficient reason for allowing Urmila Devi to implead as Respondent in this Writ Application, considering the prayer made by the petitioner, which relates to payment of salary. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this matter, as such he may be allowed to withdraw this application. The prayer is allowed, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. SKM (Mridula Mishra, J.)