1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.206 OF 2010 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.323 OF 2008 ... Sharda Synthetics Pvt.Ltd. ...Appellant v/s. Sun Industries ...Respondents ... Mr.Anil Agarwal for the Appellant. Mr.Anil Dave i/b Dave & Co. for Respondents. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,JJ DATED: 14 th June, 2010 P.C.: 1. The Appellant had filed Appeal No.454 of 2008 under the Letters Patent challenging the order dated 14 th August, 2008, by which the learned single Judge made a conditional order for admission of Company Petition seeking an order for winding up of the Appellant-company on the ground that it is unable to pay its debts. In the Appeal a 2 ground in relation to Section 22-A of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was raised. But that ground was not dealt with by the learned single Judge in his order dated 14 th August, 2008. Therefore, that appeal was permitted to be withdrawn by the Appellate Court with liberty to approach the learned single Judge. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the Appellant moved before the learned single Judge for the speaking to the minutes of the order. But the learned single Judge did not deal with that ground. Therefore, the Appellant filed a review petition before the learned single Judge for review of his order, which was Review Petition No.4 of 2009. While disposing of that Review Petition, the learned single Judge dealt with the ground in relation to Section 22-A, but has rejected the Review Petition. 3 2. Now, in this Appeal which challenges the order passed in review petition coupled with the earlier order passed by the learned single Judge. Without considering the order passed on the Review Petition, admittedly no relief can be granted to the Appellant and so far as maintainability of the Appeal against the order passed on the Review Petition is concerned, in view of the provisions of Order 47 of the Civil Procedure Code, we cannot entertain the appeal against the order rejecting the review petition. In this view of the matter, therefore, the appeal is disposed of. (D.K.Deshmukh, J.) (R.P.SondurBaldota J.)