IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.782/1010 SECOND APEPAL NO.567/2007 SHYAMSUNDAR KHANDELWAL & 2 ORS ..V.S. CHANDRAPRAKASH AGRAWAL & ORS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or judges Orders. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE: 13 /10 / 2010 Heard Shri Mundra, the learned counsel for the appellants and Shri Mohta the learned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposes the prayer made in this civil application and states that the applicants were directed to furnish surety and not security. The learned counsel for the applicant states that this court may either accept security which is furnished by applicant no.3 before the executing court or may grant further time of 3 months to the applicants to furnish solvent surety to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- as directed by this court by order dated 6.8.2008. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the contents of the civil application, it appears that it is necessary in the interest of justice to grant time of two months to the applicants to furnish solvent surety to the tune of rupees fifty lacs. It is however, made clear that since this court had directed the applicants to furnish surety by order dated 6.8.20008, there would be no further extension of time for furnishing solvent surety. While considering whether the applicant has furnished the solvent surety for an amount of fifty lacs the executing court should consider the security of rupees thirty nine lacs which is already furnished by the applicants before the executing court. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE SMP.