.J- ^ V^ IM THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDIC.ATI.IRE AT BILASPURrCHHATTISGARH) WRTT PETniON NOJ^ /2004 PEmiOMER ;^^'- £°^<:<^^A\ R/o-VIH- pachped{/p-0- Rampur, ••' •7 *<a ^t^ Bhikhari Ram Sahu S/o. Sri LR.Sahu Agedabout48yeats <? •' ^ ^^ i>y' RESPONDENT5 ..^sy ,.^y ^- ^'.- •' Tah - Kurud, Dist-Dhamtari, C.G. VERSW 1) The sta&e ofChhattisgarti Ttiroygh the secretary, Educatton Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ratpur C.G 2) District Educatton officer, Dhamtari District Dhamtari, C.G. ^PETmON UNDER ARHCLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTinjTION OF INDIA R3R ISSUANCE OF APPROWIATE WRFTC. DIRECTIONS AND/OR ORDERS XI-HC-22 3?TT^T^T f<rlich 3?T^?T 5b*iich ^f^a ^ ^^ ^y ^ T^ ^IFH^y "§?^^ P«vtt^1< , ©) 3n^r ''^(^ W^ Ha, J?^/4 WWrfT^*11<^ M 200 •f^^T' ^n^r ^«ll<9<tll^Cl 27-8-2004 On a mention being made, this case is t4ken up. Petitioner/s by Shri ^ . C * V^vvrtod State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adtocate Genpral, wifh SlmSatish Gupta, Dy.G.A, and Shri Akhil Agrawal and Shri Sandeq? Dube)|; Heard. The inatter relates to transfer ofthe peti^ Counsel for fhe petitioner/s submitte| eflfected iUegaUy in contravention oflaw and poUj Having heaid and^considered tlie rival c merits ofthe case, in the opinion.ofthis Court, +t< ^ c*+ . - '-. this order, within .:.^^...^-.-^ 10 days, and on 4>l^id^l<r1 ^l^<yff"? 1^T3t <PJI^K '^^tf^TH^TT^r 4cA-VO^GA' PanelLawyers. ioner &om the respective place. that the transfer of the petitioner/s has been y, State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that the petitiJDner/s has straightway ffled the petition mthout serving notice for demand ofjustice and represerjtation. t>ntentions, without expressmg any opinioii on the ^nds ofjustice wffl be senred if a direction is given to the petitioner/s to make detailed representati{>n raising his/her| grievances and grounds before Govemment/competent authority oftlie respond^nts, under the law, shaU consider and decide tlie same on its own merits in accordance with lawi from the date of receipVproduction of the reF|resentaiion. If any contravention of poUcy or guidelines is brouglit to tlie notice, the same be c<j Coimsel for the petitioner/s prays tha| Certified copy ^is per mles. Copy to State coimsel for compUance. .! -~l^ TT7ifh ^ copv r»^t^<=>^<atition aiid uch representation being filed, the State as early as possible preferably within sbc weeks >nsidered on its own ments. after the decision of the representation if any grievaiice of the pedtioner/s reniairis, he/she ma^ be allowed to avail die rertiedy available uiider tlie law. It is open to die petitioiier to avail the rei^edy available imder the law. With the aforesaid observations, tliis pet(tion starids disposed of. Consequently M.W.P., ifany, also stand{5 disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge A 0^\t ^^s^ [{T-S 7?nj7?