IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32978 of 2009 KHANTAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- 02/ 15.09.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the husband in custody since 25.3.2009 in a complaint case under Section 498A of the Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission is that the allegations are generalized with anything serious or heinous. The impugned order of rejection is in teeth of the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters in its judgment reported in 2006(3) P.L.J.R. 182 (Md. Naimul Haque @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Anr. Vs. The State of Bihar) and the judicial adventurism deprecated in the judgment reported in 2006(4) P.L.J.R. 342 (Ajay Kumar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar).. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Case No. C.A. 1677 of 2008. Let this order be communicated to the Presiding Officer who has passed the impugned order. DKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)