IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1578 of 2009 RAMESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 17.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is the assailant of the deceased Jagannath Mahto. Several others are injured after receiving fire arm injury caused by co-accused persons and it is submitted at bar that land dispute is there in between the parties and a case filed from petitioner’s side is also pending for the offence of the same day leveling accusation against members of the informant party. Further it is submitted that petitioner surrendered in the court below on 29.3.2007 and till today he remained in jail. According to learned counsel, some months are left to complete three years which is maximum period for which the petitioner, a juvenile can be kept in custody, in my view also that should be taken into consideration which is ignored. It is the privilege of juvenile. However, heinous may be offence. More over parties are struggling for land and all the family members are made accused. Accordingly, this revision application is allowed and the judgment and order dated 31.8.2009 passed in Cr.Appeal no. 48 of 2009 by Shri Daroga Prasad, Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari confirming the order dated 16.7.2009 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari, East Champaran in Tr.No. 37/2009 arising out of Ghora Sahan P.S. case no. 92/04 is set aside. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Motihari, East Champaran in Tr.No. 37/09 arising out of Ghorasahan P.S. Case no. 92/04. It is made clear that one of the bailer shall be maternal uncle of the petitioner who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. AI (Mandhata Singh,J.)