IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16985 of 2010 BRAJ KISHORE ROY S’o Kapildeo Roy, Resident of Village& P.O.Chandpura, P.S Raghopur, District- vaishali. ……Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR . 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Vaishali. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali. 5.The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Vaishali, District vaishali. 6 The Block Development Officer, Raghopur,District- Vaishali. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Raghopur, District- Vaishali. 8. The Mukhia, Gram Pancyayat Raj, Mallikpur, District vaishali. 9 The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj. Mallikpur, District Vaishali. 10. Kumar Rajesh Ranjan Sinha, S/O Late Ram Sloth Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohanpur, P.O. Raghopur District Vaishali. …….Respondent ----------- 02 09.11.2010 The petitioner was allegedly not shown in the merit list for selection of Panchayat teacher .He protested and that was ignored. Accordingly he was not called for counselling. Persons having lesser marks were called for counselling. Petitioner immediately approached the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority ,Vaishali by filing case No. RP- 611 of 2009. The tribunal, after hearing the officials, held that the petitioner had objected on 11.12.08. The last date for objection was being 16.12.08 and the petitioner’s objection not having considered, the tribunal directed the concerned authority to immediately consider the 2 objection of the petitioner and include the petitioner in the merit list and proceed accordingly. Thereafter petitioner’s case is that with this order of the tribunal, petitioner moved the authorities. The authorities again ignored the petitioner’s claim and appointed other persons .Thereafter the petitioner has come in this writ petition ,In my view, the petitioner is complaining with regard to non compliance of order of the tribunal by the authorities, he must first move the tribunal pointing out that the authorities have not implemented its order.If petitioner’s grievance is not redressed there, the petitioner can raise other remedy as may be but at the first instance, he must bring those facts which would accordingly decide the matter . If such an application is filed before the tribunal ,the tribunal would proceed upon it and pass appropriate order after hearing all necessary parties within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this order before the tribunal along with detailed representation in this regard. With these observations and directions the writ petition is disposed of. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)