IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (i) Civil Revision No.1008 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision 11.02.2011 Ajmer Lal Klair ...... Petitioner VERSUS Udham Kaur ...... Respondent (ii) Civil Revision No.1009 of 2011 (O&M) Ajmer Lal Klair ...... Petitioner VERSUS Udham Kaur ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.R.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: The aforesaid two petition Nos.1008 and 1009 of 2011 , having arisen out of the order dated 12.05.2010, passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nakodar, dismissing the application Under Order 38 Rule 5 read with Section 151 CPC, are being disposed of by this common order. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the undertaking given by the respondent not to alienate any part of the property, the application filed by the petitioner under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC has been dismissed. But now the respondent has sold part of her land vide sale deed dated 21.01.2011. Thus both the petitions are disposed of with the observations that the petitioner would be at liberty to move the applications afresh on account of changed circumstances. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 11.02.2011 mamta-II