'l.?^? ^ '9j^VlE »%-^-: -...... -.^^..Fi c A/"^ 'y^ (2) INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^ /2008 7 PETITIONER /^;^c.--' d^y" ./^»y ^^ ^•^y ^'\^ .^'' •^^ ^' RESPONDENTS .Vishnu Prasad Patel S/o Shri Kachhariya Patel Age about42 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Kurudih, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1 .^ State Government of Chhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner TribalWelfare Department, Korba(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer Korba(C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Korba, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ 2 ^^1%^ ^v^^i-...—^.-^-^-'^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P rS) No. 69 of 2007 Petitioner : Vishnu Prasad Patel Versus ftespondents : State ^ovemment of Chhattrjsgar+i and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gnihotri. J 5hri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for -rfie petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Poinel Jawyer for the respondents/State, ORDER (Passed on 15th day of January. 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by SatJsh K. AgmhaW^ J. Thakir 1. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioner' os well as learned Ponel Lawyer oppearing for the nB^ondents/State Jointly aubmit that the facts of the present cwse are simiJar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari <& others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhatti^arh <& others), which was albwed vide order dated 7th November, 2006. They furt+ier submit that the question of law involvecf is also the same. 2. In view of 1+ie above stated submissions made by leamed counset for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of -rfie order dated 7th November, 2006 passed by this Court- in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. Sd/- SarishK.AgniboW Judge i Bl WiJ