IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 16TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27699 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. JOSHUA CLEMENT C MANNA, OPP.ST PETERS CHURCH BOAT JETTY ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN 23 2. SHAMSHEER CK SAPNA MANZIL, KOROTH ROAD PO AZHIYUR ,KUNHIPALLI, KOZHIKODE 673309 3. NANDINI A PANCHAMI, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA 688 001 4. NAVYA PS PARAKKOTE HOUSE, EDAVLANGU PO, KODUNGALOOR THRISSUR 680 671 5. NEETHU KV, PUTHEN PARAMBIL HOUSE SAVITHA ROAD, CHLIKKAVATTAM VENNALA, KOCHI 682 028 6. NEETHU PJ, 32/847-B, PALIKA PALLICHAMBAYIL ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 25 7. NIMAITHA RAJ SREE NANADANAM, PUTHURE PO PALAKKAD 678 001 8. RAMADAS S KADAVIL KADAVIL VEEDU, ELAMAKKARA PO, NEAR PERANDOOR TEMPLE COCHIN 26 9. RASHIQ NASIMUDEEN RASHID VILLA, SUBASH NAGAR, TRAMWAY LANE,CHALAKUDY PO, TRISSUR, KERALA, 680 307. 10. ROHAN PRAKASH JHA C/O.MANNA, OPP ST PETERS CHURCH BOAT JETTY ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN 26 WPC NO.27699/10 -2- 11. SEBIN P THOMAS PUTHEN PURAKKAL HOUSE,KANJOOR PO SOUTH BAZAR, ERNAKULAM 683 575. BY ADV. SRI.S.R.SREEJITH SRI.SHIJU VARGHESE (WAYANAD) RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REP BY ITS REGISTRAR ,PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO KOTTAYAM 686 560 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATHMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSHINI HILLS PO KOTTAYAM 686 560 SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 27699 OF 2010 (J) ===================== Dated this the 7th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, petitioners 1 and 3 to 11 had failed in one paper and 2nd petitioner failed in two papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp