IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2008 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1930 OP.No. 5582 of 2002(M) ---------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.SHIVARAM KULAL, S/O. KORAGE MOOLYA, AGED 44 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL LABOUR, RESIDING AT PERLA HOUSE OF CHIPPAR VILLAGE, AMMERI P.O., KASARAGOD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KUNHI, W/O. LATE DOOMA MOOLYA, PERLA IN CHIPPAR VILLAGE, AMMERI P.O., KASARAGOD TALUK. 2. KRISHNA MOOLYA, S/O. LATE DOOMA MOOLYA, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 3. SARASWATHI, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 4. NARAYANA MOOLYA, -DO- -DO- 5. SEETHAMMA, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 6. SUMITHRA, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 7. DINESHA MOOLYA, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 8. GOPALAKRISHNA MOOLYA, -DO- -DO- 9. SHEELAVATHI, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 10. DEVAKI, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 11. GANGADHARA MOOLYA, RESIDING AT -DO- 12. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A), MANJESHWAR. 13. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KASARAGODE. 14. COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, TRIVANDRUM R12 to R14 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SMITHA SRI.K.G.GOURI SANKAR RAI FOR R1TO6,8 TO11 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 ORDER ON CMP 9782 OF 2002 IN OP 5582 OF 2002 DISMISSED 12.6.2008 SD/-C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 12TH RESPONDENT DATED 30.8.1979 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RDO, KASARAGODE DATED 25.4.1995 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 14TH RESPONDENT DATED 1.3.99 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- O.P. NO. 5582 OF 2002 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Assignment of 1.67 acres of land to the petitioner is interfered with by the Revenue Divisional Officer in appeal filed by respondents 1 to 11. Petitioner's revision against the said order is dismissed by the Government. Consequently the 12th respondent is bound to reconsider the matter. O.P. is accordingly disposed of directing the 12th respondent to reconsider the petitioner's claim after hearing the petitioner and respondents 1 to 11 in the light of statutory provisions and under current norms. A decision should be taken within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2