1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4768 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4768 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4768 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.387 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO.387 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO.387 OF 1992 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Janu Halya Bhingarkar @ Govari since deceased by his LRs. Changunabai J. Bhingarkar @ Govari & ors. : Respondents. Mr.K.K.Tated, AGP, for the State. Mr.Sachin Punde for the respondents. WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4769 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4769 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4769 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.387 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO.387 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL NO.387 OF 1992 Janu Halya Gowari alias Bhingarkar (deceased) Changunabai J. Bhingarkar 2 2 2 @ Govari & ors. : Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Mr.Sachin Punde for the Petitioners. Mr.K.K.Tated for the respondent. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 28th October 2005. DATED : 28th October 2005. DATED : 28th October 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Both the applications are for same purpose. They are for bringing the legal heirs of the deceased respondent. Therefore, allowing one application will be sufficient. Therefore, application filed by the State i.s. Application No.4768 of 2005 is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. Advocate for the new or proposed respondents waives service. In view of this, Civil Application No.4769 of 2005 does not survive. Both the Civil Applications are disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]