Petitioner Ku. Rekha Singh Banswar, D/o. late B.R. Banswar, aged about 49 Tahsiidar Mungeli, R/o. Mungeli, Tahsil and Dt Versus Rsspondents 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary Department of Revenue D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur, Dlstt. Raipur (C.G.) Co!!ector, Collectorate Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Writ Petition under Articte 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) jnate Bench: Hon'ble Justice Satish K. Aanihotri Present : ShriSanjayK. Agrawal,counse!forthe petitioner. lon15 , 1. The petitioner has impugned the transfer order dated 08.06.2( (Annexure-P/5) wherein the petitioner -has been transferred from Mungeli to Biiaspur. By the interim order dated 15.06.2006, the petitioner has continued in the service at the originaf piace of posting ti! date. 2. It is weil settled principte of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular officer/employee be posted keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency. The Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere with the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malafide, non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. In view of the faci that due to the interim order the petitioner has aireaa'y served for about a ye^r at the oid place of ® '-, 1 posting, it is not necessary to examine the vatidity of the transfer order at this stage. 3. in view of the forgoing this petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. However, in the facts of the case, it is expected that the State-respondents shall not insist upon compiiance of the order dated 08.06.2006. The respondents are at iiberty to pass appropriate orders in the public interest and administrative exigencies, if so requlred, to post the petitioner. Sd,'- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge