IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-10895 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 08.04.2011 Paramvir Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate, for Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. He contends that the complaint case is registered on 29.09.2003 and till date only one accused has been served. Dismissed as withdrawn. In the meantime, personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused: (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. However, it is made clear that at the time of framing of charges, petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court with his counsel. April 08, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE