..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2638 OF 2008 Pawankumar Sawarmal Agarwal. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. Mr.S.K.Ali, Adv. i/b. S.K. Ali & Associates for orig.complianant. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th September, 2008. DATED : 11th September, 2008. DATED : 11th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.119 of 2008 of Anti-Robbery Cell. The said case is mainly under Sections 420, 468 of IPC. 3. When the applicant had preferred an application for bail before the Sessions Court at that time the charge-sheet had not been filed. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that in view of the statement made by the learned APP that the charge-sheet has been filed, he seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to ..(2).. file a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court in view of the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed. Liberty as prayed is granted. On such application being preferred before the Sessions Court, the learned Sessions Judge to consider the same afresh and dispose it of on merits. 4. With the above observation, Criminal Application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed and is disposed of as such. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)