THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7220 of 2007 Between: P.Aparna and others. .. PETITIONERS and The Commissioner of Police, and another. .. RESPONDENTS ORDER: It is stated that the 1st and 2nd petitioners are majors aged about 23 years. The 1st petitioner is working as Software Engineer in a private institution while the 2nd petitioner is working as Senior Technical Co-ordinator in Beam Cable System Private Limited. Both of them fell in love and they married on 15-03-2007 as per Hindu customs and rituals at Arya Samaj Mandir, Amritpuri-B, East Kailash, New Delhi. They have also got their marriage registered with the Registrar of Hindu Marriages, S.R.O., Bowenpally, Secunderabad, on 24-03-2007. It is stated that the parents of the 1st petitioner did not accept for the said marriage. At the instance of the parents of the 1st petitioner, the 2nd respondent is illegally interfering with their marital life without there being any complaint whatsoever. It is stated that both of them are majors and they are entitled to lead their marital life without any interruption from anybody. The 3rd petitioner is the father of the 2nd petitioner. It is stated that against the said illegal action of the 2nd respondent, petitioners 1 and 2 also made written complaint before the 1st respondent on 21-03-2007, which was received by the office of the 1st respondent on 23-03-2007. In spite of the said representation, the 2nd respondent is illegally interfering with their personal life and liberty. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to take appropriate immediate action on the representation of the petitioners, dated 21-03- 2007, which was received by the office of the 1st respondent on 23-03- 2007. The 2nd respondent is also directed not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners. If any complaint is pending, the same may be enquired into, without arresting the petitioners, and get their statements recorded by the concerned Magistrate. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________​_ 10-04-2007 Prv