IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11224 of 2011 MD. ASLAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and admittedly, the marriage had taken place eight years ago. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that an attempt to patch up the dispute of the parties, was taken by the learned court below but the petitioner refused to enter into the compromise though the complainant was ready to live with the petitioner. Therefore, it is apparent on the face of the record that now there is no chance of reconciliation between the parties. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 28.01.2011 and so far as the allegation is concerned, it appears that it is second round of litigation between the parties and earlier the complainant had filed Complaint Case No. 2090 of 2006 which was dismissed as the parties had entered into compromise. Therefore, it appears that the parties are on litigating term since the year, 2006. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Aslam be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount - 2 - each in connection with Complaint Case No. 2226 of 2008 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Purnea. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)