IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13717 of 2008 DHARMENDRA KUMAR . Petitioner. Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna 2.The Member, Boardof Revenue, Bihar , Patna 3.Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patnaq. 4.The Collector, Patna, Bihar. 5.Station House Officer, P.S. Pandarak, Dist. Patna….Respondents. ----------- 4 6.7.2010 No body appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State of Bihar is present and submits that this writ petition has become in- fructuous because the claim is for an excise licence for the shop for the year 2008. According to him licences for such shop are granted annually and probably for that reason no interest is being taken on behalf of the petitioner. Since learned counsel for the petitioner is not present, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman