IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6336 of 2010 YOGI SINGH @ YOGENDRA SINGH, SON OF DIPO SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 08/04/2010 Supplementary affidavit has been filed explaining the antecedents of the petitioner. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report wherein it has been stated that two unknown miscreants had shot dead the deceased. During investigation, one Prithwi Raj was arrested who disclosed the names of Guddu and Mohan as having committed the murder. In paragraph-26 of the case diary it has been noted that the petitioner had gone to the house of one Mirtunjay Singh and Guddu and, therefore, it was suspected that the petitioner had also a hand in the planning of the murder. However, during investigation it has also transpired that the deceased had taken huge amount of money from various persons in the garb of giving employment to persons but had failed to do so. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 4.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Khagaria, in Parbatta P.S. Case No. 31 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Khagaria, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and thereafter every two weeks for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the - 3 - Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)