IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17866 of 2011 PRABHASH YADAV, Son of Ganesh Yadav, Resident of Lokha, P.S.- Supaul, District – Supaul. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.06.2011 Heard Sri Krishna Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tarun Prasad No. 1, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner who has been made accused at the stage under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and in custody in Sessions Trial No. 195 of 2008 (arising out of Bangaon P.S. Case No. 32 of 2008) for the offence under Sections 413/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that during the course of investigation the petitioner was made accused. However, final report was submitted in favour of the petitioner which was also accepted by the court below. However, during the trial the petitioner has been made accused while exercising power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and he has remained in jail since 12.04.2011. In view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner namely, Prabhash Yadav be enlarged 2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IIIrd, Saharsa in connection with S.T. No. 195 of 2008 arising out of Bangaon P.S. Case No. 32 of 2008, on a condition that one of the bailor must be close relative of the petitioner, and secondly, the petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date, failing which, his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, in special exigency, the petitioner can remain absent on a particular date with prior permission of the Trial Court. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)