1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1985 OF 2010 Avchitrao Pundlikrao More …....versus...... Additional Commissioner, Amravati and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MAY 05, 2010. Heard Shri A.V. Gawande, learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Motion of no confidence is carried out against the petitioner. His appeal is dismissed by both the Authorities. Learned counsel for petitioner contends that the notice of meeting was not validly served. With his assistance and assistance of learned A.G.P. I have perused the papers. The authorities below have applied their mind to the documents produced and have found that notice of meeting was legally served on all the members, including the petitioner. Said finding is not being demonstrated to be either erroneous or perverse. Notice dated 16.11.2009 contains the date, place and time of meeting and it also is accompanied by the motion of no confidence. Said documents are not 2 produced by the petitioner before this Court. In view of this, no case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is thus dismissed, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.