1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2000 OF 2006 David Mascrenhas ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. M.S. Bhandari with Mr. Johnson John for Petitioner. Mr. V. Phal, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. Mr. D.H. Mehta with Mr. Mahadik for R. No. 2. Mr. J. Reis with Mr. Y.M. Choudhari for R.Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: AUGUST 28, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 28, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 28, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The case of the Petitioner in the instant case is similar to Writ Petition No. 1993 of 2006 which we have disposed of today. . The learned counsel for the Petitioner however, submits that the Petitioner in the instant case had not filed any petition opposing redevelopment. On behalf of the respondent society, the learned counsel points out that the order of eviction dated 22.2.2006 will indicate that the Petitioner was given an opportunity of joining the society and as he failed to comply with those directions, an order of eviction came to be passed. 2 . We are not inclined to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction on the facts of this case. It will be open to the Petitioner, to ventilate their grievances for whatever rights before the appropriate forum. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)