hvn 5//wp//1887.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1887 OF 2011 Dr. Vipan Banwarilal Kumar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Mahendra V. Swar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. Mr. Ramesh W. Pathai, Advocate for respondent no. 2. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent. The parties are present. The controversy between the petitioner Dr. Vipan and respondent No. 2 his ex. wife Smt. Tasneem Chand is settled. Respondent nos. 3 to 6 are formal parties being accused in the prosecution initiated by respondent no. 2. The F.I.R. revolves to offence under section 498A, 406, 420 1 hvn 5//wp//1887.11 giving rise to the complaint PL(w) 1100420/PW/2004 before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 52nd Court at Kurla, Mumbai. The Pay Order of Rs.2,21,000/- is received by respondent no. 2 by way of settlement between the parties. Respondent no. 2 also confirms she has no controversy with petitioner or other respondents and also confirms of signing the terms for settling the controversy. As the dispute between husband Vipan and wife Smt. Tasneem Chand, respondent no. 2 is settled, the prosecution referred to above against the petitioner and other respondents is quashed and set aside. Writ petition allowed to the extent as above. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) 2