THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31856 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 & 2 in interfering in the civil dispute and harassing the petitioner by summoning him to the Police Station frequently and threatening to register false cases against him as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent in the interest of justice.” It is the grievance of the petitioner that at the instance of the fifth respondent, there is interference by the second respondent - Sub- Inspector of Police, Chinnaganjam Police Station, Prakasam District, with his life and liberty. It is submitted that in view of approaching of the fifth respondent, the second respondent sent two home guards to the house of the petitioner on 31.10.2010 and they insisted him for payment of amount of Rs.2,10,000/- to the fifth respondent and that the second respondent detained him in the police station. When the matter came up for hearing on 20.12.2010, it was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader to get instructions. Based on the written instructions sent by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Chinnaganjam Police Station, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents that dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent is civil in nature and allegations made by the petitioner are baseless. It is also submitted that the second respondent has not sent any home guard to the house of the petitioner, not interfered with the life and liberty of the petitioner and not detained the petitioner in the police station as alleged. Though there are specific allegations made by the petitioner, such allegations are denied by the second respondent, as stated by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents based on the written instructions sent by the second respondent. Recording the statement of the second respondent that he is not interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner and the disputes, which are of civil nature, between the petitioner and the fifth respondent, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that any such complaints further will be viewed seriously. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 27th DECEMBER, 2010. kvni