IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2009 KEWAL CHARI PRESENTLY IN SADA JAIL VASCO ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. RUSHIKESH KERKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Suraj R. Naik,Advocate for the applicant. Mr. J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 2nd April, 2009 P.C. The complainant and the accused are present before the Court. They have filed an application for compounding of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant states before the Court that he has settled the matter out of the Court and he is ready to receive Rs.40,000/- towards the full and final satisfaction of his claim against the appellant/ accused. The appellant/ accused has deposited a sum of Rs.60,000/- in the Court. In view of this terms of compounding, a sum of Rs.40,000/- be paid to the complainant / respondent and Rs.20,000/- be refunded to the accused/ appellant. In view of this compounding, the revision stands allowed and the accused stands acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The bail bond executed by the accused, stands discharged. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. SMA