1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3400 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION STAMP NO.267 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.R.S.Shinde h/f. Mr.M.M.Avhad, learned counsel for applicant Smt.Y.M.Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 17th November 2009 Heard learned advocate appearing for the applicant. By the present application, the applicant is praying to condone the delay of 146 days to prefer the criminal revision against the order of acquittal passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions case No.84/2007 vide his judgment and order dated 29/12/2008. It is stated in the application that after the judgment and order of acquittal was passed by the learned Sessions Judge, the applicant was under the impression that the State prosecution will challenge the order of acquittal by preferring 2 the appeal against the order of acquittal, but no proposal for preferring an appeal against the acquittal was submitted on behalf of the prosecution and hence after the complainant lost hope that any appeal will be preferred by the State against the order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court, she collected the certified copies and preferred this criminal revision to challenge the order of acquittal passed by the learned Trial Court. The grounds mentioned in the application to condone the delay are satisfactorily explained, hence criminal application no.3400/2009 deserves following order : O R D E R 1. The application is allowed by condoning the delay in preferring the criminal revision. 2. Office to register the criminal revision accompanied and give the number. 3. Applicant to take the circulation for the admission of the criminal revision after it is numbered by the Registry. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/NOV 2009/cri-appl-3400-09