IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44150 of 2009 SATYENDRA MISTRY S/O SITARAM MISTRY R/O VILL.- MESKAUR, P.S.- MESKAUR, DISTT.- NAWADAH Versus . THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 22.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is one of the accused persons of Sirdala P.S. Case no.29 of 2008. The said case was registered under sections 302, 201 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the first information report, marriage of Kunti Devi (deceased) was solemnized about l2 years back with Mahendra Mistry. They have three sons out of the wedlock. The eldest was stated about ten years of age. The allegation is that all named accused about ten in number conspired, eliminated the deceased and hit the body to remove evidence of crime Submission of the counsel based on the allegation is that many persons have been made accused in this case without attributing anything specific against them. It is not a case where death has been caused due to dowry demand or harassment related with the said marriage. The petitioner happens to be brother of Mahendra Mistry who is young boy studying in Intermediate and has been falsely implicated in this case. Some of the submissions are borne out from the evidence. Keeping in view in mind, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge I, Nawada in Sirdala P.S. Case no. 29 of 2008. Both the sureties will be - 2 - executed by close relations on due identification. The petitioner will cooperate in the trial. shahid (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J))