IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.24357-M of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 ARTI & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ETC. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. SS Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Narender Sura, AAG, Haryana. . AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners got married against the desires of respondents No.4 and 5. The petitioners are of legally marriageable age and, therefore, have exercised their right. Now, petitioner No.2 has been implicated in a criminal case viz. FIR No.233 dated 4.9.2008 under Sections 363/366/120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Saran, District Faridabad. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that a perusal of the petition itself would indicate that no offence, as alleged, has been committed by petitioner No.2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State states that the statement of petitioner No.1 is required to be taken, which would be done and the matter would be considered in the light of the contents of the petition. The private respondents have been contacted and the petitioners Criminal Misc.24357-M of 2008 2 need have no fear or threat from respondents No.4 and 5. In view of the above, no further directions are required to be issued. The petition is disposed of. September 24, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE