1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4781/2006 Date : 20.10.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Neel Kamal Bohra for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no recovery has been effected from the accused applicant and only on the basis of hearsay allegation, a case has been lodged against him. He submits that it is a case where the applicant should be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me. 2 After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Neemichand S/o Babulal shall be released on bail in FIR No. 209/2006 P.S. Sadar Kotwali, Jodhpur, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.