-';'- HIGHCOUSrOEJUD!CATURECHHATTISGARH:BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRl S.R. NAY'AK, CJ Petitiener Writ Petition No. 2655 of 2086 Smt. Tulsi Bai, wrtfe of Late Moolchand Thakur, agsd about 55 years, resident of House No. 54/1106, Shanti Vihar Colony, Daganiya, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondente 1. 2. 3. ChhatBsgarh State Eleetridty Board, through the ExecuUve Engineer, Daganiya, Raipur. Kumbhkaran Verma, aged about 47 years, son of Shri Kartikram Verma, resident of Teacher's Colony, Daganiya, Raipur. The Rent Controtling Authority, Raipur. Present: Shri B.P. Sharma and Shri ^it Singh, teamed counsel for the petiSoner. ORALORDER [Passedon 6tn July, 2006) The averment made in this writ peUtion itsetf would show that the petitioner-tenant has had the benefit of power supply to the subject premises by virtue of an order made by the Rent Controllmg Authority up to the perfod ending 27-05-2006. In the couree of arguments, 1 pointedly asked Shri B.P. Sharma, leamed counsel for ttie petitioner whettier any application was moved before the Rent Confrolling Authority for extension of the interim order before or after 27-05-2006, learned counsel, on instructions, would submit that no such appllcaUon is made so far. If the petitioner requires continued supply of the electricity to the premises in questton, and since he had ^irlier moved an appllcatlon and ttie Rent Controlling Authority had granted relieffor a particular period, it is open for the petitioner to make nscessary 2-- application for confinued supply <rf electricity to ttia premises till the dispute between the petiUoner-tenant and the landlord is decided bythe Civil Court and/or other Component Authorities. In that view of the matter, 1 dismiss the writ peUtion, however, reserving liberty to move an apptication before the Rent Controlling Authorify. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice ^ T