IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 672 OF 2006 Ansari Abdul Khalid & Anr. ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondent Mr. A.M. Sarogi for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for respondent No.1. Ms. P.S. Purandhare for respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. : F.I. REBELLO, J. : F.I. REBELLO, J. ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. V. MOHTA, J. V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st March, 2006 : 21st March, 2006 : 21st March, 2006 P.C. . The application of petitioner No. 1 husband has been rejected by order dated 16th March, 2006. Petitioner if aggrieved, can prefer an appeal which is available. Petitioner No. 2 claims as wife of petitioner No. 1 that she has an independent structure. It is the case of the petitioner No. 2 that she has made an application for allotment of premises as a protected person. If that be so, petitioner No. 2 to send a reminder to respondent No. 1, enclosing there with a copy of previous application. On receiving such application, respondent No.1 to dispose of the original application within eight weeks thereafter. ( 2 ) 2. On behalf of the respondents, the learned Counsel submits that the structure has been removed on 18th March, 2006. The learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner disputes the same. 3. Petition disposed of accordingly. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]