.<1 ^ 81NGLE SEKCH l,\QO' ^-" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4-° ^^ /05 PETITIONER \0^••^ ^•^"^ ^•••^>-'' .,.•'"' ^I^-""" '.>.M-^" ^:^' y RESPONDENTS Balkrishna Sharraa , aged about 58 years, S/o. Shri Laxmi Prasad, Occupation - Head Master, Aadim Jati Middle School Reevapar Development Block- Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) ^' "3?rP^/ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Aadim Jati and Anusuchit Jati Vikas Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- CoUector, Aadim Jati Vikas, Korba (C.G.) ^ / 3. ^pj'r^' ^ \y^ ^ s' ^ ^^ Block Education Officer Development Block, Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) . 4. Conimissioner Adiin Jati and Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Raipur (C.G.) / 5. Asst. Commissioner, Adim Jati and Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Korba (C.G.) 6. Prem Lal Devaagan, further Head Master, Adim Jati Middle School, Reevapar, Developinent Block Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUAMCE QF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND ORDER/DIRECTION ^A^.-^— -- - ^•cq?^||qi<')«,U>T!^|^l<|&,Iqrtl^^ *IT*1C5I ^*fT^ .^.•.e..:.^.Q.^. on^^T^rR^jch wiTan^?TA^icb ^ x ^:. ^^ an^^TlRFEp (^cli^el^) ^2005- ?T?ffWrxiRa 3TT^$T Pajliel 26.9.2005 W.P.No. 4066/2005 Shri Haniiinaa Prasad, Shri Akhil Agrawal, No. 1 to 5. Heard on adniission. Leanied counsel for substaatial reUef, clamied ia the order dated 11.7.2005 (^ suspension passed agamst] aufhonty. Perused fhe records of I The mipugned order pj axi appeUable order under } Services (Classi&cation, Contj view of fhe niatter/ I am n| petition agsdiist fhe impugne^ The petition staiids However, if so advisec| before the appellafe authorit] appellate autliorily shatl be accordaace witih. law. <pi<<ic5<n<i «ii+ioi'^'i^^£t\f^i^i>( ^3if^T3TI^^T counsel for fhe petitioner. Lawyer for fhe State/respondents fhe petitioner submits ftiat tiie the writ petition is for quashment of Lnnexure P-11) which is an order of the petitioner by the conipetent Lhe writ petition. ^ssed by fhe coinpeteut aufliQrity is ±ie provisions of M.P. (C.G, ) CivU rol and Appeal) Rules, 1966, In fh.is Dt mcliiied to mterfere in this writ order of suspension. distiiissed. , fhe petitioner may file aa appeal 7 and if such an appeal is filed, tlie obUged to dispose of the appeal ia Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^^'