IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2009 / 9TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3059 of 2009(L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- GEORGE MATHEW, MOOLETHADATHIL, PAINGARAPPILLY, ARAKKUNNAM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. MR.P.P.JACOB. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE MULANTHURUTHY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 23, MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SENIOR INSPECTOR/SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), KANAYANNOOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), ERNAKULAM. 4. THE NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, TRIVANDRUM,. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.3059 of 2009-L = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Notice to the first respondent is dispensed with preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. Learned Government Pleader appears for respondents 2 and 3. Notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with. The petitioner challenges the enforcement of Ext.P1 award as per Ext.P4 proceedings on the plea that Ext.P3 is pending seeking the benefit of Ext.P2 scheme. Ext.P2 scheme provides certain reliefs to the agricultural sector. According to the petitioner, the loan availed by him was for a cow-shed, which is an agricultural purpose and it was availed on 5-6-1997 as apparent from Ext.P1. Under such circumstances, it is ordered that Ext.P4 proceedings will be held back for a period WP(C)3059/2009 -: 2 :- of two months and the competent authority in the first respondent will consider Ext.P3 in the meanwhile and issue its decision to the second respondent on the basis of which alone would further action follow on the basis of Ext.P4. If the request of the petitioner is ultimately rejected, the competent authority will also state the reasons for doing so. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/100209