1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CENTR.EXCISE APPEAL No. 30 of 2007 U.O.I. V/S M/S B.G.MARBLES PVT.LTD. Mr. VK MATHUR, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 12.9.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J. ORDER ----- The matter comes up with the report that notices of respondent no.2 are awaited. From the order sheets it transpires that vide order dt. 18.4.2007 appeal was admitted. Then, on 18.7.2007 it was reported that notice of respondent no. 1 received served, and since then the notice of respondent no.2 are continued to be reported to be awaited. As against which what we find is that the notice of respondent no. 2 issued on 26.4.2007 for the hearing of 18.7.2007 has been duly received served on 6.7.2007 itself, and has been received in the Registry also way back on 17.8.2007. It is strange that notwithstanding this such wrong report is continuing, and the matter is proceeding ahead. The Dy. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to look into the matter, and take appropriate disciplinary action for not looking in the file, and making such wrong report, 2 and continued to make such report for about one year. Nobody appears for the respondent no.1 who is the main contesting respondent. However, the controversy involved in the presentmatter is covered by the decision of this Court dt. 6.12.2007 rendered in the Central Excise Appeal No. 55/2007 Union of India Vs. Mahesh Granites Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. In that view of the matter, for the same reasons this appeal is also dismissed. ( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/