1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.365 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.540 OF 2004 The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. ...Plaintiff. vs. M/s.Tejas Steel. ...Defendant. --- Ms.Sonali Shinde i/b. M/s.Consulta Juris, for Plaintiff. Ms.Ratnawali Patil i/b. A.R.Bamne, for Defendant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 9th January, 2007. P.C.:- 1. The suit of the plaintiff-bank is based on a promissory note executed by the defendant. The defendant has been served with the summons for judgment in the month of November,2006. Till today there is no application made by the defendant seeking leave to defend the suit. Therefore, in terms of Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree. Heard the learned Counsel 2 appearing for plaintiff. Perused the record. The summons for judgment is granted. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed in terms of prayer clause (a). Refund of court fees as per rules. ---