1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2091/2006 IN FA (ST) NO.3797/2006 (M.I.D.C. .v. Saul Kalpana Gondrao Fiske and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri M.M. Agnihotri, Advocate for the applicant. Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, Advocate for the respondent No.1. CORAM : C.L. PANGARKAR, J. 14TH JANUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. This is an application for condonation of delay. There is a delay of 207 days in filing the appeal. It is stated that the appeal could not be preferred since the Regional Manager, Nagpur was transferred and the track of the cases was lost due to that fact. He submits that when quarterly review of the cases was taken it was found that the present case though decided no steps were taken. The respondents, though duly served, have not filed their reply. It appears that there is no objection for the delay being condoned. It is found from the judgment of the lower Court that the compensation has already been awarded. 2 In view of this, it appears that the appellant has good case on merit. In these circumstances, the delay in filing the appeal stands condoned. Civil Application No. 2091/2006 stands disposed of as such. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that his client is ready to deposit the decreetal amount. In view of this, the decreetal amount be deposited within a period of one month. In the meanwhile, interim stay to the execution of the decree. Notice of this appeal as well as application for grant of stay be issued to the respondents returnable five weeks. Shri D.M. Kale, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.2/State. JUDGE *rrg.