A ^^?::.. -;:..^s""" ®iS»! f^ ^ C^i •yz> IN TE e"JBIGH COURT OF BILASPUR LTTISGARH AT W.P.(s)No. ^'M JIWS^- PETTTIONER : Mangan Lal, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Dharmu Ram, Assistant Teacher Govemment Primaiy School, Kurejhar, District Rajnandgoan (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhatdsgarh Through Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) .0^ ^J,f\"/^ District Educatian Officer, Chhuria, ^ i .V ^? District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^y^ ^h/ v o' 3. Block Education OfiBcer Block Chhuria .Disteict - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION U/A 22^/27f OF THE CONSTFTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND )THER SUTTABLE WBITSAND DIRECTIONS The above named petitioner most hittnbly and respectfully begs to submitas under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIb<SPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE *tft. SATISH K. /(6NIHOTRL J. WKTT PETTHON (S.) N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents yersus Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhatl'isgarh and o-thers WRIT PETmON tS.) NQ^AWOF 2007 Petitioner Respondaits wrsus Siddharth Choure State of Chhatl-isgarh ond olhers WRTT PETmON IS.) N0. 466^0F 2007 Petitioner ftespondents wsrsus Panch Ram 5ohu State of Chhattisgarh ond o'thers WRTTPETTnON G5J N0. 4670F 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus AAenharon Lal Pithauru State of Chhatl-isgarh ond oltiers WRTTPETmON (§.)N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Yaggaya Dattu Baghel State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WKTT PFTTTION ffij N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Shifa Khopercby State of Chhatt'isgarh ond olhers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner : Radhey Kishun Patel versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgnrh and others WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus AAflngonLal State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT pennoN (s.) NO. 472 OF^QQZ Petitioner : Dhal Singh Sonwoni versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond o'thers WRTT PETmON (S.t N0. 473 OF 2007 - Petitioner : Onkar Lal Sonboir versus Respondents : State of Chhonisgarh ond o-thers WRIT PFTmON (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Shiv Kumar Shorma versus ftesoondents : State of Chhattisgarft and others WRTT PFTinON (S.) N0. 4Z5^F 2007 Petitioner ResBonden+s yersus ftajendra Kumar Sogar Stnte of Chhattisgarh and others ^o WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 476 OF2QQ7 Petitioner : Atakhantal Thakur versus ftespondents : State of Chhattisgnrh and o-thers WRTT PETmON (S.VNO. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner versys ftespondents Fool Chond Kamleshwar State of Chhattisgarh ond others Petitioner WMT PETmON (S.^ N0. 478 OF 2007 Rnjendm Kumar bewongon versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh <md o'thers And WMT PETmON (S.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitjoner Resoondents yersus Jaydnt Kumar Shendey State of Chhatt'isgarh and others Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advooate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Oubey, Sowmnient Advocate for the State/respondents. OROER (Passed on 24til Dey of JcBuiary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel eppearing for -the petitioners o« well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearing for the Stute/reqiondents jointly submit that -Hie facts and question of law mvolved m the present batch of writ petitions ore squarely covered bylhe decision of this Courl' in the case of Vaslwwit Kumw Bhevwdwej vs. Munle^af Cor'pilfWtlmi, thvy emd aiwrtiM/^. 2. In aibsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (,6ofMsh Kumar Vermavs. The Staiv 6wt. of Chhattisgarh anrf dnoffHu) and o-ther connected matters, decided by 1his //"-"^° /^ S] Court on 15-12-2006, pursuont to the mwno dated 28-1-1995, issued by -the Secre-tary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal ond -the prospechis of Diploma in Education Examination, it was chrified that •the nomenckiture of the Bnsic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in EAication, i.e., t>.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Cerl'ificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {jSvipedi Kumar Vermaw. The State Govt. of Chhatfi^arh andMwihei) (Supra). 3. For -Hie aforementioned reasons, -the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yadiwmit Kumar BhafwdwaJ (Suptv^, subject to verification of +he fact ns to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I./ti.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circuhrs dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 and further whe'ther •they have been paid two odvance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of 1his order be placed on the record of •the connected writpetitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 20060:I)MPJR-CG96 Thakur