IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6238 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S MITHUN AGRO OIL (P)LTD,VAZHAKKUNNU, ALOOR.P.O, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.K.O.ITTOOP. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM.PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASST.ENGINEER,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.REP; BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 6238 OF 2009 Y ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Exts.P6 and P7. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. Learned standing counsel would submit that Ext.P7 can be treated as a provisional bill and if the petitioner files objection against the same, it will be considered. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as follows. If the petitioner prefers objection to Ext.P7 within ten days from today before the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent will consider and take a decision on the same in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt of the objection. Till such time, there will be no disconnection. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE