IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 82 of 2011. Decided on 17th May, 2011. Sanjay Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus O.P. Sharma. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner complains of non-compliance of the judgment dated 6th May, 2010. On going through the affidavit, we do not find any contumacious conduct on the part of the respondent since the private respondent in the writ petition was not willing to work in any of the vacancies pointed out by the petitioner. Therefore, this contempt petition is dismissed. However, in order to avoid any further litigation by the petitioner, we make it clear that in case the petitioner produces willingness of the private respondent in the writ petition to work in any of the vacancies pointed out by the petitioner, on that willingness the respondent shall take action and in the resultant vacancy, in case the 2 petitioner is otherwise eligible, he shall be re-engaged as PTA teacher until he is otherwise replaced by a regular appointee. 2. The contempt petition is dismissed, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 17th May, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr/K) Judge.