IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 7358 of 2010 (O&M) Shaktiman Cement Factory and another ...Appellants vs The State of Haryana and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Nand Lal Sammi, Advocate for the appellants. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to avail alternative remedy of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, as constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Act') against the order passed by the Haryana State Electricity Regulatory Commission. It was further submitted that as during the pendency of appeal in this court, limitation for filing appeal before the Tribunal has expired, the delay in filing the appeal be condoned. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. As far as delay in filing of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal is concerned, the appellants may file application seeking condonation of delay thereof before the Tribunal, which shall be considered by the Tribunal in terms of proviso to Section 111 (2) of the Act. 14.2.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge