THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5154 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.47 of 2007 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur, Kurnool District against the petitioner for recovery of amount. The suit was decreed on 05.11.2008. The respondent filed E.P.No.11 of 2009 for execution of the decree. His prayer was to attach the property mentioned in the petition schedule and to sell the same in accordance with law. The petitioner opposed the E.P. by stating that the property was originally owned by his mother and thereafter, it was sold in favour of his sons in the year 2007. The trial Court overruled the objection raised by the petitioner and allowed the E.P. through order, dated 29.09.2010. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard Sri K.G.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.Prakash Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. To prove his contention that he is not the owner of the property in question, the petitioner deposed as R.W.1 and filed Ex.B1, Encumbrance Certificate. It clearly shows that the property was initially in the name of the mother of the petitioner and in the year 2007, it was sold in favour of the sons of the petitioner. At no point of time, the petitioner was the owner of the property. The attachment was ordered on 16.05.2009. The only ground on which the trial Court rejected the objection raised by the petitioner is that the electricity connection for the property stands in the name of the petitioner. Even if the petitioner has obtained electricity connection in respect of the property in question, he cannot be treated as owner. It is not uncommon that the persons who are not owners, such as lessees, licencees obtain electricity connections in respect of the property that is owned by others. Except that the electricity connection is in the name of the petitioner, there is no other fact, which proves his interest or ownership upon it. The alienation of the property took place long before the E.P. was filed. Therefore, the civil revision petition is allowed and the order under revision is set aside. It is left open to the respondent to proceed against any other property, which is owned by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.01.2011. kdl