1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 953 of 2009 (Karbhari Vs. State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.S.Janephalkar, Adv., for the applicant. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP for respondent State. Mr. R.V.Gore, Advocate, for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:27/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Heard both the Counsel extensively. Rule. By consent the matter is finally heard. 2. Shahadu, father of Karbhari, prosecuted him for an offense under Sections 406, 420, 34 of IPC, alleging that on 3.6.2008 and 21.6.2008, the sale proceeds received after disposal of the property were allegedly to be deposited in the Bank. Karbhari, in presence of relations, son-in- law and two daughters, represented that the amount is to be deposited and collected an amount of Rs. 2 50,000/-on 3.6.2008 and Rs.30,000/- on 21.6.2008. However, the amount is not deposited and complainant feels deceived at the hands of his son and other relations. The matter was moved to the Court. Learned Judge by order dt. 30.7.2008, directed inquiry under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. Thereafter, chargesheet is filed. 3. At this stage of the matter, since the witnesses are supporting contentions of the complainant Sahadu handing over the sale proceeds to his son, to be deposited in the Bank, apparently there is no abuse of process of the Court. Interference not warranted. No humiliation as could be indicated having undergone by Karbhari or other accused. Consequently, Criminal Application dismissed. Rule discharged. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/953-09crapl ...