IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 6 OF 2008 IN TAX APPEAL NO. 33 OF 2007 COMMUNIDADE OF MOROMBI-O-PEQUENO THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY MR. ANDRE AGNELO OLIVEIRA ... Applicant Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... Respondent Mr. Ajit R. Kantak, Advocate for the applicant. Coram:- A. P. DESHPANDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 29th September, 2008 P.C. This review petition is filed by the petitioner whose appeal has been disposed of by an order dated 23.11.2007. While disposing of the appeal, this Court permitted the Revenue to proceed with the penalty proceedings, however, directed not to enforce the same till the Supreme Court decides the matter pending before it. The order has been passed after accepting an undertaking tendered by the petitioner/appellant. 2. By the present review petition, twofold submissions are made. One, that the impugned does not take a correct view of the law. This is, obviously, beyond the scope of review jurisdiction. Hence, can't be considered. 3. The second submission is that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the undertaking. This, yet, again can't be permitted. It is only after accepting the undertaking that the impugned order has been passed. 4. No case for review is made out. Review petition is rejected. A. P. DESHPANDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.