C .^ , •7<=10 o -». IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRITPETITION NO.~T--> /^—/2005 PETITIONERS / /"^/ ^ .^7 ^w *.'••'.j?"\^ ^^c^ f^ ^^ •^" ^ /l. Smt. Rukmani Devi Gabel, aged about 24 years, wife of Shri Tejlal Gabel (daughter of Late Hariprasad Gabel) resident of Aadil, PO Aurda, Tah. Malkharauda, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) y2. Ku. Girija Ghaadra. aged about 21 years, son of Shyam Lal Chandra, son of, Katari, PO Sonadula, Tah. Malkharauda; Distt. Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh). /3. Smt. Chandrakala, ;aged about 31 years, wife of ShivKumar Gabel, (sonofShri ; Dayal Singh Gabel), resident ofDarrabhatha, Post Sakarra, Tah. Malkharauda, District Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) 4. Kumari Suman Gabel, aged about 19 years, son of Shri Purushottam Lal Gabel, resident of Qtr. No. 304 Sector 4, Type A, Balko Nagar, Korba, presently residing at - Darrabhatha, Post Sakarra, Tah. Malkharauda, District — Janjgir-Champa''$p@.) ^.5.! - ;.Shrikant,Vermi|Kag^[:at)<H^|:, 28 years, son of| Yashwaht Singh fis^^M "•^^^ ^C&E®'^ ^ RESPOND3ENTS -4- resident 01 EagataKi.^ 'Sah. Malkharauda, Distt. uanj'gir - Champa (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS /V. The @bllector. District Janiar Champa (C.G.) /2,. JscBpad Panchayat - Malkhairauda, through - its Chief Executive Officer. Malkharaud, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (ChhatttSgaTh)^ t^ jyRTT PETmON UNBER AKTieLE 22& QF;THE CONS'nTUTlON OF INDIA.IN ,FORM QF MAND»lffiUS;iQR ANY OTHER; FORM :QE WRTT OR DIRECTTON QR£)R0ERSMTHEFA(3TSC>F'THECASE WARRANT' " ; ..' ' •• ' .:.. 1::'.-..: • '; • :':;:,:'..;.: :'-•::":. x HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR ru T) WRTT PETmON No. 4972 of2005 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS Smt. Rukmani Devi Gabel & Others. VERSUS The Collector, District Janjgir-Champa & Another. WRIT PEimON UNDER ARTICLE_226 OF TBECONSTmmON QF IND1A SB: Hon'ble ShriSatish K. Asnuhotri, J. Present: None forthe petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate forthe State/ respondent No. 1. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 06" day ofApril, 2011) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for waot of prosecution. Interim relief graiited on 14.11.205, is vacated. Consequently,M(W)P 4026/2005, stands disposedof. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Aimt M^SsSSSS^i