IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27369 of 2008 Between: S. Vijaya Kumar, S/o. David, O/o. M.P.D.O., Atlur Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Kadapa, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the orders of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal dt. 18-11-2008 passed in O.A.No. 9122/2008 along with the impugned Show Cause Notice vide Proc.Rc.No. 5/24/2008, dt. 22-09-2008 of the respondent which was served on the Petitioner on 05-11-2008, and quash the or set-aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of the APCS (CCA) Rules, particularly Rule 20 and non-est in the eye of law apart from violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the judicial pronouncements on the subject. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: CH.VEDAVANI(SC FOR MPP AND ZPP,RAYALASEEMA) The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the writ petitioner filed O.A.No.9122 of 2008 against the show cause notice dated 22.9.2008 and the A.P.Administrative Tribunal dismissed the said O.A. on the ground that the application is not maintainable. It is specifically stated subsequently regular enquiry has been conducted and the petitioner was also dismissed from service. Therefore, nothing survives in the writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous keeping it open for the petitioner to question the dismissal order. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 4.6.2009 kpr