.,^><i^ '^"^"^^^^^^^ ';®:^ %».SK >iSa"s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2923 of2005 PETITIONER Kalyan Dipak S/'o Gokul Dipak, aeed about 28 yeai-s, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Basna, Telisil Basna, Dist. Mahasaniund (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESP0^7DENTS : 1. Collector, Mahasamiind, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTtCLE 226^227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bie SIiri Satlsh K. Asiuliotri, J. •(' Preseat: Shri V.R.Tiwaci, Advocate fbrthe petitioner. Shri A.S.KaclAwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/'respondents. 2. (Passed on 30th day of September, 2008) Leamed counsei appearing for the petitioaer submits that fhe laiid in dispute belongs to the State Government. He further submits that the petitioner, being a member of Scheduled Tribe, is entitled to erant of certain laiid. On enquiry by the autliorities, mitially it was found that the land in dispute is available an.d suitab.ie for grant of patta to the petitioner. Subsequently, further enquirv was made but till date, no action has been taken. He seeks liberty to approach the respondents for relief. Be tliat as it may, without expressing any opinion on merits ofthe case, liberh' is reserved to the petitioner to make appropriate application before the CoSleetor, Mahasamund, in tum, the Collector, Mahasamund shall consider aiid decide the application in accordance wifli iaw, within a period of eieht weeks from fhe date ofreceipt offhe representation. Further, in the event it is found tiiat the case for grant ofpatta is stili pending consideration- the same may be coisidered and decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofeieht weeks froni the date ofreceipt ofa copy offhis order. 3. In view of the foregoing, according to lea-med counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothingremains for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, fhe petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. [ , Sd/- _, SatishK.Agnihotn Judge