IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10923 of 2009 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH @ KAILA, Son of Late Prabhu Narayan Singh, resident of village – Kaithma, P.S., Mufassil, District – Begusarai. …. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opp. Party. ----------- 05/ 08.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Admitted position is that the petitioner was granted bail in Begusarai (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 112 of 1999 which was registered under Section 302 and other offences of the IPC vide order dated 5.7.2000 contained in Annexure-1, but for one and other reason the petitioner could not furnish bail bonds at that point of time. For escaping from Hazat an FIR was lodged in which the petitioner was subsequently granted bail. Submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that in the light of the above there was no occasion for the court below to reject his prayer for bail on the ground that after the grant of the bail by the High Court he had jumped the bail. Contention of learned counsel is that since the petitioner has not executed the bail bonds there is no jumping of bail and the petitioner is now willing to furnish the bail bonds in terms of the direction of the court. Keeping the above submissions in mind, let petitioner Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Kaila be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional 2 Sessions Judge-1, Begusarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 247 of 2002 arising out of Begusarai (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 112 of 1999. One of the sureties will be executed by the immediate blood relation of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. It is also recorded that the petitioner will cooperate in trial and will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. DKS/ ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J. )