1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.2386 OF 2005 Manubhai Paragji Vashi ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Shri M.P. Vashi – Petitioner in person. Shri A.A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General with Shri A.A. Sayyad, AGP for the State. .... CORAM: R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. 5th March, 2007. P.C. : The affidavit filed by the Petitioner is taken on record. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit it is apparent that the grievance of the Petitioner has been satisfactorily addressed and necessary arrangements have been made and proper steps being taken, nothing survives in the matter. As regards the grievance of Respondent No.8, if so desired Respondent No.8 to take out appropriate proceedings in that regard. The question of granting any relief to Respondent No.8 in this Petition does not 2 arise. Hence, the Petition is disposed of in view of what is stated in the affidavit filed by the Petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. (R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)