THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No. 30454 OF 2011 O R D E R: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for APGENCO appearing for the respondents. 2. On a complaint made by the 5th respondent- Superintending Engineer, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner and enquiry is now proposed to be conducted by an officer i.e. the Chief Engineer, who is above the rank of the Superintending Engineer. Petitioner now seeks that a joint enquiry be conducted against the Superintending Engineer as well along with the enquiry against the petitioner. 3. I am unable to see any material with regard to the alleged misconduct by the 5th respondent-Superintending Engineer. In fact, the 5th respondent-Superintending Engineer is the complainant on whose complaint charges are framed against the petitioner. Petitioner, therefore, has no right to insist that enquiry be conducted against the 5th respondent-Superintending Engineer also and that such enquiry should be conducted along with that of the petitioner. Since there is no factual basis for the said claim, Writ Petition is clearly misconceived and liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 21st November 2011 Tsy