IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27275 of 2009 MD. NAHID ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 19.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 25(1-B)a,26 & 35 of the Arms Act and Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per F.I.R., the bag containing arms and ammunitions including bomb was recovered from the possession of co-accused, namely, Md. Mithu @ Zaki Alam. Six other persons were also sitting there which includes the petitioner. Thus, it is stated that there is no recovery of fire arms from his possession. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to the statement made in paragraph no.9, submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Patna City in connection with Khajekalan P.S.Case no. 101/09. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)