lfff?L.i*il G^s^J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATJJRE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^t00 / 2006 PETITIONER ^J^,^ I- -<^ y^ o\>t <l: ,.0^: \v^' ,<i& Risabh Kumar Jain, S/o. Shri Bhagchand Jain, aged about 48 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Boys Hr. Sec. School - Kondagaon, Btock - Kondagaon, Distt. Jagdalpur (Bastar) (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..••"''\<-''' °>y..- V^^S.--" y^\^" cu^r> ^<d^iy ^^\. <^-" fc'>"' 2. 3. NA State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Depari:ment ofTribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. -Jagdalpur ( Bastar) (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTLTUTION QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE O^^SUITABLE DIRECTIGNCTC TO DO JUSTICE IN TKc MATTER. ir la iSiB HI6H COURT OF CHHAmSSARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. W. P. (s) No. 7096 of 2006 Petitioner Awadhesh Kumar Pandey versus Respondents State of Chhatt-isgarh and others W P(s.) N0.7097 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Radheswari Patel versus Respondents State of Chh(ittis90irii and others W P (s.) N0. 7098 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Mridula Jofar ResDondents versus State of Chhattisgarh and o-riiers W P (s.) N0. 7099 of 2006 Petitioner Akhilesh Kuinar Singh versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner ResDondents WPfa.^NO. 7100<»f2006 Risabh Kumar Jain versus State of Chhattisgarh ond others Petitioner ResDondents W P (s.) N0. 7101 of 2006 5mt. Anjali Mehra versus State of Chhcrttisgarh and others Petitioner ResDondents W P b.1 N0. 7102 of 2006 ©opalDewangan versus State of Chhattisgarh <md others Petitioner Respondents And W P (s.) N0. 7103 of 2006 Nakul Singh Netam versus Stateof Chhattis9arh and others Present : Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioners Miss Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. OR OER (Passed on -riiis 20th day of tiecember, 2006) 1. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit •Hiat the facts ond question of law involved in 1+ie present writ petitions are squarely covered by 1+ie decision of -rtiis Court in the case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipal Corporation. Dwy and anothei^. 2. For the aforementioned recsons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of 1+iis Court in the mctter of yashwwit Kuinar aradimJ(Svapira}, subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.!. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and t-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advonce increments or not. No order os to costs. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writpetitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agaihstri Judge 1 2006CII)M,PJR-C696