1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5937/2010 Suresh G. Shiram Vs. Manohar T. Rewatkar Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Chopde, Adv. for the petitioner CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER13, 2010. Heard Advocate Chopde with Advocate Prajapati for petitioner. The justification that document was not in custody of petitioner-defendant cannot be accepted as fact of extension of time was very much within knowledge and could have been put to respondent- plaintiff during his cross-examination. The trial Court has given various dates on which petitioner-defendant obtained adjournment after plaintiff’s cross-examination which was over on 13.4.2007. Thus, application for amendment has not been moved by petitioner immediately and its rejection does not suffer from any jurisdictional error or perversity. The petition is therefore not entertained. JUDGE Ambulkar