&C £@2/ /, IN-THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CH HATTISGARH w.P. s No. 41— 1200 PETITIONER /Smt. Bhalentina Bada‘ ow Tirky), W/o. Shri Bofas Tirky, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Girl's School — Dumariya, Block — Baikunthpur‘ Distt. — Korea (C.G.) VERSUS State ofChhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare/Education DSK.S. Bhawan, Ra'ipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Department of Tribat Welfare, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District— (Baikunthpur) Korea (C.G.) District Education Officer, Distt.- (Baikunthpur) Korea (C.G.) (N XI—HC—78 (9 Mo HI §.‘.. oo o. o. o. WW W 2007 mwmw Thakur Mr Anil Singh Rqjplilt Advoco Mr' Arvmd Dubey, Panel Imy r for *he respondems/Sfafe Wifh ihe consem of learned ounsel appearing for fhe partles ihe mmers are heard finally and d posed of Common order dlc‘l'o‘l'ed m W (s) No 4O of 2007 m open Cour+ passed separafely. d on record in other connecikd wrif A copy of this ordeir be plac pew-ion. Sd/- e ‘ Satlsh K Agnmozn Judge fe for the pefifioners. 1 g z t i RIO. zg’ / HIGH CQJRT OF CHI-IA'ITISGARH AT BILASPW W.‘ P.(5) N0. 40 0f 2007 Pefi‘rioner : Sm‘r. Jyo‘ri Tirky Versus Respondenfs : Smfe of Chhnmsgarh and others And W. P.(5) N0, 41 0f 2007 Pe‘l'i‘l’ioner : Smf. Bhalenfina Bndn (Now Tirky) Versus Respondenfs : Sfafe of Chha‘hisgarh and ofhers sB: Hon'ble Mr. Jusrice smssh K. Agnihm, J Present: Mr. Anil Singh Rnjpu‘r, Advoame for- fhe pefi‘rioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Pmd Iawyer for the respondents/5mm. O R D E R (Pnswd on fhis 15'“ Day of January, 2007) 1. learned counsel appearing for fhe pefifioners as well as for me Slum/responden‘rs join+ly submit lhof fhe fads of the presen'r wrif pefi‘l'ions are similar 1o fhaf of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sudail Tiwari and ofhers vs. Sm Government of Chhaffisgarh d: o‘lhers), which was allowed vide order dafed 7.11.2006. They further wbmi‘l' 1ha'l The question of low involved is also 'l'he some. 2. In View of 'lhe above slated submissions made by learned counsel for 1he parfies, ‘lhese pe‘lifions are allowed in ferms of 1he order dated 7.11.2006 passed by +his Court in W.P. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwori and ofhers vs. S'la-re Governmen'l of Chha‘rfisgarh 6i o‘lhers). No order as f0 cosfs. \ l r /sk / 3. A copy of 'l'hisx order be placed on record in ofher connected writ petition. Sdl- Satish K. Agniimtn t ‘ Judge Thakur