..J fr-.' ^-; S,, u;.i'£.«,^tK ,'~1 y Oy-1 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l WRIT PETITION fS.) N0. J?<?^Tl/2Q09 PETITIONER ^^ f.f>" .•<<;L'.^'~ -.••' ^s^ '^ ^- ^p'' -&vr' .«<•? < ^- ^'-" .«?-'' RESPONDENT 1. 2. Bhikhwa Ram Sahu, aged about 48 Years, son of Shri Banau Ram Sahu, at present working as a Patwari, Old P.H.No. 96, New P.H.No. 23, Village Baroda, Tahsil and Distrirt Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.), Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), Deepak Bhadulkar, at present work- ing as a Patwari, P.H.No. 137, Uper P&F&, Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTI- TUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI.ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS ETC. rfl; T 't&.-^K H SV^S ^T K;-11<* '^TT -3H^T Sh*lic»» ^^ •^I^K'I^, ^Tily'ie, f««ni'H^< 1.1 *ll*<ni ^Wh sn^r TPW (i°ii^«<<i«r) SIiri Vishnu Koshta, coliii.sel for fhe petitioner. '}iakur, Dy. A.G. for the State/resp. Shri Yashwant Sin.gh T^ No. l to 3. Grievaace of ftie petiti' been transterred in place of is EiJreadv workiug and it is that the said post i& vacant. jiner is fhat respondent No.4 has pie petitioner where the petitioner ^nentioned in ffae order impugned Contention of coun^ petitioner because it has bee4 itself fh.at in case of the po; who is working earlier wouid '*i<<i!-i^l'f ^w'-S ^ felzt <!aitiK ^•siRnan^ ;1 for tbe petitioaer is fhat consequence of ftie inipugn^l order would be shifung of the inentioned itl the iaipugned order jtmg of a new person, fhe person be siufted. He fiu-fher siibmits that he roiay be periaitted to -ivift(di-aw tlie present petition -Hdfh a liberty to file fresh representa(ion to fhe respoadeats No. 2 & 3. He also subirdts that he has yet notliing has beea doiie. fresh represeatation to fhe direction laav be issued t4 fhe aufliorities concemed for cleciduig the representation e^peditiously feh-cadv inade a representation but !He subinits that he will laake a jrespondents No. 2 fs 3 snd a IV. •amed counsel for t}ie State has no objection if the petition.er niakes a represent^tion and the sauie is decided by the com.petent auttiority. 4 ..iisae;^ f' S.^aiiSfa, '; ^•t^'^'-''^ K '..XI-He—78 3Wia! 'iil' Vf«i» '•aiTsntw' w 7=f ^ww^, w\wis, fsKni'yy rf^.....^:..^..t5.).....a>z.^../. > 3ii^TTra^T (' '^' •z^ Accorduiglv, the petitid the aforesaid Uberty. lu tlie by fhe petitiouer wifhia a p^ receipt of fhis order, the sa~s\ b;.r fhe coiapeteiit authorit}- weeks froni the date ofitsisd ?rf?A •WRTfif fe^t ^f&RZR ^rsiRnsntyf ia is disiuissed as wifhdrawn 'vi-iT.h eventualifa' of tllin.e representation ?riod of teii davs from. the date of tie would be decided expedinously preferabl;/ withm. a period of hvo ;lpt. ___ Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge