IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 RSA.No. 1012 of 2006() ---------------------- AS.42/2003 of SUB COURT, PALA OS.46/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT, PALA .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: --------------------------------------------------- JOSEPH, S/O.VARKEY, CHENNATTUKUTTIVELIL HOUSE, PULITANNOOR KARA, PULIYANNOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.J.HARIKUMAR SRI.HARIKUMAR.S. RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ----------------------------------- JOSEPH @ JOY, S/O.JOSEPH, MUTTATHUKUNNEL HOUSE, EZHACHERRY KARA, VELLILAPPALLY VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE NARAYANPARAMBIL THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.S.A.No.1012 of 2006 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010. JUDGMENT Defeated defendant in a suit for recovery of possession on the strength of title is the appellant before me. Suit concerned 12 cents of land which courts below found belonged to respondent/plaintiff and accordingly he was allowed to recover possession of the said property from appellant/defendant. 2. Now the parties have settled the dispute outside court amicably and have filed I.A.No.373 of 2010. Terms of the compromise are set out in the application. Learned counsel on both sides request that in substitution of the judgment and decree of courts below appeal may be disposed of in terms of compromise. Accordingly, compromise is recorded and a decree is passed in terms of the compromise in substitution of the decree of the court below. The compromise petition (I.A.No.373 of 2010) and the plan appended to it shall form part of the decree. No costs. I.A.Nos.2421 of 2006 and 2815 of 2008 will stand dismissed. Registry shall send the records to the trial court forthwith. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge.