hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 264 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVN APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2010 Subadai @ Subhadra Digambar Ghate ... Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Jaydeep D. Mane, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : 1ST DECEMBER, 2010 P.C. This is an application filed by the advocate for recalling the order dated 26th July, 2010 and restoration of the Criminal Revision Application No. 183 of 2010. The order sought to be recalled reads as follows : "1. Being aggrieved against framing of charge under the provisions of S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 alongwith the offences under the Indian Penal Code, the present applicant has preferred the Revisional Application. The matter was adjourned on number of times on the request made on behalf of the Advocate for the Applicant. On last date, the matter was adjourned as a last chance. But today, again the Advocate for the applicant is absent. 2 The revision application, therefore, stands dismissed for want of prosecution." In the application for Restoration there is virtually no ground made out for non attendance of the matter. At para 4 of the application, it is vaguely stated that the advocate for the applicant was in personal difficulty and could not attend the court on that date. The particulars of personal difficulty are not mentioned. The particulars of the ground were imperative in view of the warning of the last opportunity contained in the order of the adjournment granted earlier. Besides the application fails to make out any excuse for absence of the applicant. In the circumstance, it must be held that there is no case whatsoever made out for non attendance on the date. Hence, application is rejected. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)