WP(C) 1455/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. M. Bhagawati, learned Central Govt. Counsel, appearing for the respondents. In exactly similar circumstances, as the present one, a writ petition, which gav e rise to WP(C) No.2666 of 2010, was disposed of, on 21.04.2011, by making the f ollowing observations and directions: Nobody has questioned the OBC certificate produced by the petitioner on the gro und that the certificate is a forged one or has been obtained fraudulently. Mere ly because the caste certificate issued in favour of the petitioner by the compe tent authority not in the prescribed format given by the respondents, it will be unjust to deny the petitioner for consideration of his case under the said cate gory. In case of any doubt, the CRPF authority can very well verify the same in consultation with the issuing authority. Since the petitioner would have got dif ferent consideration as an OBC category candidate, but his case was considered a s a general candidate, I am of the considered opinion that his case needs to be considered afresh as an OBC category candidate applying the same yardsticks and parameters which have been applied to the case of the OBC category candidate. The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to carry a fresh exer cise as expeditiously as possible preferably within 30.06.2011. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of, in tune with WP(c) No.2666 of 2010, by directing that the case of the present petitioner be considered by the respondent/authority con cerned afresh as an OBC category candidate applying the same yardsticks and para meters which have been applied to the case of the OBC category candidate.