IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 741 OF 2005 IN STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO. 2332 OF 2005 COMMUNIDADE OF QUITOL THROUGH ITS ....Applicant ATTORNEY SHRI. SUCUDO GOVIND DESSAI Versus THE FABRICA OF BETUL CHURCH, AND 3 ....Respondents ORS., Shri. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for Respondent No. 4 (absent). Coram:- SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. Date:- 6th July, 2006 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. Respondent no.1 is served, respondents no. 3(a) to 3(c) are served, respondent no.4 is represented by Advocate but his Advocate is not present. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that he wants to delete respondent no.2 who has not been served, because though respondent no.2 had filed a claim subsequently he filed a written statement stating that he does not have any claim in the acquired land. In view of this respondent no.2 is permitted to be deleted. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. In the circumstances of the case and for the reasons stated in the civil application, civil application is allowed and delay is condoned. Civil application is disposed of. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. NH