1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.7825 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Ramasamy .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Tahsildar, Periayur Taluk, Periayur, Madurai District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of his house which is situated in S.F.No.134/16 in Chinnareddipatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District without following any due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For Respondents : Mr. M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of his house which is situated in S.F.No.134/16 in Chinnareddipatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District without following any due process of law. 2. Heard Mr.T.Vadivelan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is some disturbances by the Tahsildar, which may result in demolition of the property. In the typed set of papers, the copy of the documents viz., patta, field map sketch and chitta have been enclosed. However, there is no document to show that the petitioner has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 informed the Tahsildar not to disturb his possession without following the due process of law and neither there is a complaint to the District Revenue Officer nor to the District Collector. Therefore, no mandamus can be granted as prayed for by the petitioner in this writ petition. 5. The petitioner, however is directed to approach the District Collector or the District Revenue Officer to redress his grievances by making a proper representation. The Authorities shall consider the petitioner's claim in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioner's claim and the Authority shall dispose of the representation if it is made on its own merits. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Tahsildar, Periayur Taluk, Periayur, Madurai District. +3 CCs to Mr.T.Vadivelan, Advocate (SR.No.22836) W.P(MD)No.7825 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 14.07.2011 ssl NSV/14.07.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/