IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application(C482) No.690 of 2011 Ms. Anu, W/o Sanjay Kumar R/o Main Bazar Tharonda P.S. Tharonda District Karnaal (Haryana) ………..…Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Home Dehradun. 2. Sushil Kumar Gupta S/o Shiv Narayan R/o Ram Ghat Sabji Mandi Haridwar ....……Respondent Shri S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate, assited by Shri G.K. Verma, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Shri B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this petition moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), the petitioner has sought quashing of the proceedings of criminal complaint case no. 122 of 2007, Sushil Kumar vs. Prashant Mittal , relating to offences punishable under section 498A, 406 IPC, 2 and one punishable under section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, pending in the court of Chief Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is married sister-in-law of the daughter of the complainant Sushil Kumar (respondent no. 2). It is further submitted that it is abuse of process of law to drag her in the criminal proceedings in dowry harassment case particularly when she lives far away from the house of the husband of the complainant's daughter. 4. No doubt it cannot be denied that there might be false implication of the petitioner Ms. Anu, who is resident of District Karnaal in Haryana. Admittedly, she is sister-in-law (married NANAD) of the daughter of the complainant. However, considering the fact that the criminal complaint case relates to the year 2002, when the accused were summoned, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the trial of the case after a period of nine years, and stay the same. 5. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, 3 the petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 02.08.2011