IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2010 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1932 ST.Rev..No. 260 of 2009 ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER OF S.T.A.T.ADDL.BENCH,TVM. IN TA.182/2008 .................... REVN.PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE : ------------------------------------------------ M.V.R.INDUSTRIES (P) LTD., FORMERLY M.V.R.EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED NO.I, PILLAYARKOIL STREET,MANAPAKKAM,CHENNAI, REPRESENTED BY IT'S POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER- SRI.R.JAMES. BY ADV. SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LAW), COMMERCIAL TAXES,ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. K.P. PRADEEP THIS SALES TAX REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2010, ALONG WITH STRV NO. 263 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, CJ. & P.R.Raman, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S.T.Rev. Nos. 260 and 263 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010 O R D E R P.R.Raman, J. These revisions are filed against a common order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Additional Bench, Thiruvananthapuram dated 06.06.2009 in TA Nos.182/08 and 71/09. 2. For the reasons stated in the order of the Appellate Tribunal we are also of the opinion that these cases can be remanded for fresh consideration by the assessing officer, in accordance with law. In the remand order the Tribunal has further directed that an opportunity be given to the revision petitioner to produce the relevant documents and after hearing the appellant, fresh orders will be passed. 3. After arguing for some time learned counsel for the revision petitioners sought permission to withdraw the revision petitions. But, he requested that the assessing officer may be directed to give copies of the documents which are already on S.T.Rev. Nos. 260 and 263 OF 2009 -:2:- the file, to which he had already made a request and that has not yet been complied with. 4. We heard learned Government Pleader also. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner in both cases is permitted to withdraw the revision petitions and the Revision Petitions will stand dismissed as withdrawn. There will be a direction to the assessing officer that in case an application is made by the revision petitioner specifying the documents, copies shall be furnished to him and thereupon the assessing officer will proceed to decide the matter as directed by the Tribunal. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. P.R.Raman, Judge. ttb S.T.Rev. Nos. 260 and 263 OF 2009 -:3:-