(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 Laxman Trimbak Bhor ...Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporationof Greater Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents And Arvind Vaidya & Ors. ...Opponents. ..... Ms. Nandini Gupta, counsel for Petitioner Mr. A.S. Bhor, counsel for B.M.C. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.5. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . The petitioner is present in the Court. Ms. Nandini Gupta, the learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that nothing survives in the contempt petition as at present. Hence, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged. (-2-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 5072 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 5072 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 5072 OF 1992 IN IN IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 Shanti Sadan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. ...Petitioners. Versus Laxman Trimbak Bhor & Ors. ...Respondents. ..... Ms. Nandini Gupta, counsel for Respondent No.1 Mr. A.S. Bhor, counsel for B.M.C. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . In view of the disposal of contempt petition, this application does not survive and the same is disposed of as infructuous. (-3-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 3620 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 3620 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATIONNO. 3620 OF 1992 IN IN IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1991 Laxman Trimbak Bhor ...Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporationof Greater Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents And Arvind Vaidya & Ors. ...Opponents. ..... Ms. Nandini Gupta, counsel for Petitioner Mr. A.S. Bhor, counsel for B.M.C. Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.5. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 23RD FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . In view of the disposal of contempt petition, this application does not survive and the same is disposed of as infructuous.