HfGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH SIMGLE BENCH: HQN’BLE SHRf SR. NAYAK, CJ. N WRIT PETITION NO. 2655 OF 2005 PETtTlONER Manglaram Dhankar, 3/0 Dwarikaram Dhankar, Aged about 40 years, R19 ViHage - Nahamtfa, Tahsil -— Gundardehi; District - Durg (0.6.) Vs. ESPGNDEN \... 8tate (3f Chhattisgarh : Through its secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikash Vibhag, DKS Bhavam Raipurx (ca) 2. Sub-Divisianal Officer, Patan, Dismct -Durg (C.G.) Th$ Returning Officer, Panchayat Etection ‘fear 2005, Bkack —- (C.G.) Gundardehi, Tahsil & Dismct Darg 4, Faguram Sonkar, S/o Rammtan Sonkar, R/o Village — Nahanda, Tahsi€ - Gundardeshi, District - Durg (C,G.) 5. Téjuram. SKo Manoharial Dewangan, R/o Village — Nahanda, Tahsil - Gundardehi, District - Durg (C.G.) 9a Presem‘ Mr. PR. Patankar. learned counsei for the petiiiariei Mr. Utkarsha Verma, {earned Dy. GA, for the State Mr. AShok Gupta; {earned counsel for respendent No.5. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12 January, 2005) Learned caulwsei amearing far at} the parties submitted that the facts of the case and the i3sue that arises for decision-making fn this case are similar to the one in WP. No.4330 or 2005 and therefore the order made by this Court In WP. No.4330 of 2005 squarely covers this Case. RTS ‘ @ In viéw of the joint submission made by iifie teamed counsei fer the parties and for the reasons stared by this Court in its i order dated 14/09/2005 in WP. Na.4339 of 2005, thi$ writ petitian is allowed and the impugned arder is set aside. However, the second respondent is directed t9 dispose of the elestion petitian expeditiousiy. (2) k j? Sdl- i i Chief Justice Judge J