IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2623 of 2011 Alinagar Prakhand Matsjivi Swawlambi Sahakari Samiti Limited. Hariyath through its Chairperson Dukhani Devi, W/o Sri Sukhdeo Sahni resident of village, Hariyath, P.S. Bahera, District- Darbhanga, Bihar :--- petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Mr. Amitav Verma, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar 2. R.N.Choudhary, Director, Dept. of Fisheries (Headquarter), Bihar, Patna 3. Mr. Nishad Ahmad, Dy. Director, Dept. of Fisheries (headquarter), Bihar, Patna. 4. Mr. Durga Prasad, Dy. Director, Dept. of Fisheries, Govet. Of Bihar, Darbhanga, Bihar. 5. Mr. Pradip Kumar, District Magistrate, District- Darbhanga, Bihar. 6. Mr. Subodh Kumar, District Fisheries Officer cum Chief Executive Officer, Darbhanga, Bihar. 7. Mr. Ravi Shankar Gupta, Fisheries Extension Officer, Alinagar Prakhand, Darbhanga. 8. Mr. Bauwe Lal Sahni, S/o- Late Chingi Sahni, resident of village- Antaur, P.S. Bahera, District- Darbhanga Chairman Alinagar Anchal Matsajivi Swawlambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Antaur :--- Contemnor/Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 3. 12.10.2011. In compliance of the order of the High Court dated 21.1.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 5606 of 2007, Annexure-1, alleging non- compliance whereof, this contempt petition has been filed the Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department has passed order dated 09.09.2011 in which he has held that notwithstanding the cancellation of the settlement of the Jalkars made in favour of the petitioner under order dated 30.12.2004 and restoration of the Jalkars under orders dated 10.9.2005 petitioner continued to harvest fish and Makhana from the Jalkars 2 and thereby she is not entitled for any reduction in the Reserve Jama. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that under order dated 09.09.2011 Secretary has not held specifically that petitioner remained in possession of the Jalkars for the period between 30.12.2004- 10.09.2005 and until such finding is recorded proportionate reduction in the Reserve Jama has to be allowed in favour of the petitioner. Aforesaid aspect of the matter can only be considered if petitioner assails the order dated 09.09.2011. The contempt petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 09.09.2011 if she is aggrieved by the same. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)