Iii THE HIGH CWRT OF CHEATTI3GARH AT BILA5PUR w.;P.No. %{ of 2000 KUN‘TI KARAT. W/o Sri 8hiv $hankar Karai, 38 years, r/o Vill. Aghanpur Distt. Bastara .- PET ITIQNER V ERSUS RE$IJONDEI§TS z '1. $tate of Chhattisgarh through : Secretary Panchayat 8c Social Welfare, Raipur. 2. The Chie£ Executive Oi‘ficer, Fi sherie s—farmer—Development Agency, J'agdalpur. Gram Penchayat, Aghanpur through: Sarpanch, Aghanpur Distt. Easter. WRIT PETZCTION UNDER ARTECLE 226 é’c 227 of THE CONSTITUTION OF INEIA. XI‘HC—22 213=€$5SQQ§33 Shri i31‘afuila Bharat, C'ouns 31 fer the pEtitLormr. Shy; 122mm: Siiigh, GA. wiwil Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, RL. for the Siam. Hsai‘d. Theugh Tina mattér is Estad but coxmidming mat a Short qua: of itim‘néd counssl for the patitjm Stam (3011511361, the, mattsr is bEiug 1i is not (iisputed £11m o: granted a fmhing ham in rcspec 10 years. This is clear from K11a$ra No.46 for a paiod of Annexure Pffi Accordmg to the passessian 0f T116 temk am} Startt bafora the ex15iry of the lsase, Vick wheyeof is Annaxure P/ 1, tha 15 ase deed was canceHed which order i$ t11€a$ubj6ct mattar of chai lenge in thiS Writ petition The petih'oasr coxlteild$ fr Lat ihe order of cancellation of 1€a$e waS passmrl WiThQut accomi mg i0 her, any opportunity of 4’ {or orders on I.A.No.226] 2001, n‘ion is imioivod, on the prayer Ler and with the consem of the disposed of a1; this stage. 1 6,3.1§97 the petitioner was t of Pancialitarai Pond bean'ng petifioner, she was pEaced in :{1 fishing Operation. However, : order dated 29. 1 1.2000, copy ' i®éf® __ 2_ XI—HCv22 311%5rm W%W vi 2m, -7——v'\ $mW$wmW% § $ww €Fm%na§$ haaring which omiSsimi is suiiic avermant which is; coniaimaii petition no spaciiic raply hag b z and 2 1'11 thc—J return, Tim Gragh Panchayat was sew’ea but has not €nier€g1 app€arance. ’1‘11113, fact that béfore m6 Older of gmtiiioner Waé; n6iih€r noticed 1‘ mafia“, m6 order impugnsd (Ann zmd is accordmgly quashad. It g / (any action is to be talmn, it sh< >u1c1 be 1‘11 accordanCé Witii, the mks and mgulations govesrnmg pCtitioner a masoixablc opportum' . 1s, this fmtition is disposal of. Consaquantly, LA. Nos. 4923/2662, 2889/2002 and 860/ 2003 fer urggnt hearing also Siand diSposed of. With the, above observatim ient to Vitiate the orcier. Tox this in paragraph 6.2 of thE Writ gap. givgn by mspandents N0. 1 it is more or less all acimitted caxm€11ati0n was paswd: the Vor heard. in this View 0f tha exure Pf 1) ca1111ot be sustained ‘06s without saying that in casg ; th€ field aftcr giving to thf: ty of hearing Sd/- P.CvNaik Judge