??;;?'.'-T'-^K '-^S;:^ 8?^B W.GH COURT QF CMHATnSSARf-l AT BIt-ASPUK WritPtetjtion fSVNa. 3865 of 2008 Peti+ioner Versus Respondents }. 2. 3. Sy-anendra Protap Singh, 5/o. 9'iri P- Ssngh, cged ofcout - 36 years, R/o Tikari, Joj-v. Tewther t>istt Rewu (M.P.) Chairmun, Coa! Indiu Ltd- 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kotkats (W.8.) birector- p- & Ift-).Coa! India Ltd., 10, Metaji Subhosh Road, Koikata (W.B.) Membar 5ecretui-y, JBCC-VI (Joint Bipai-tite Committee for- The Coui L".dus*rv), Coa! India l-Td. 10, Netaji Subhu^n Ruud, Koikata (W.B.) Oioirnsan-Cum-M.ariogina tsirector, S.E-C.L- Head QTr. SeepaT Road, Bitaspur (C.e.) Chief ©enera!Marwuer, 5. E. C. L. Ai-ea Rhatyaon, bitt.- Su«'9uja(C-i3.) WRTT PETETQZN VM&ER ARTZCLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF IN&IA »|ngie Bcrieh : Hon'bie Mr-. Sotish K. Agniho'tri, J- S'nri Rahul Mial.ra, Advocate for •the- petitioner. Shr'i Vivek Sharma. Advocate on tha auti-iorit/ of Shr-i Provaeri bas, Ad'/ocate for the respondents. 5. 1. ORAL ORDER (Possed on this 21°day of July, 2008) Vi/itii +he consent of -ri-ie appearing parti&s the matter- is finaily heus-d. 2. Learnad counsel appeor-ing foi- the petitioner- subtnits thot the c.aae. of •tS-i£ petitioner is simiiai-iy situated to •that of the raspondants in the matar of Chutrfnon. Centr-o! CoaSfwlds Ltd. & othars Vs Jry-endro Prosod Thfon &. otKers (Civil Appeai No. i714 of 2007). Leamed counsa! furtl-iei- submits tS-iat the aiid Civi! Appeai has faeen disposed of vide order ciatsd 29th .Vvaran, 2007. passed by ths Hon'bis Supreme Court of Inciiu. 'r-Se further submits+hnt thiS case may aiso be ciiq3osed uf in the sama terms. Wne.r-Stde. has no objection. In viaw of •rt-ie above, tfie pieti+iun stands ciisposed of 'm •rtte same terms, fiub iect to varificution of facts. 3. Th(^<ur Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge