y.ff'\T£^M'"i Surtidas Manikpun, s/o Sudhudas Maniltpuri, aged about 5° years, Patwan, t'.C. fiio. 83, K.t. Gu-cie ^lsliQSGXEiunci.. ^si^isil. Sul3~Divi.sio1'i & Uismct, Maliasamuiict, K/o Avodhva N?3@Fnr. MQJia.sBiTiuTid_- Tcth-sil * ^J ~^ --••-°-\/ ^-- •• • ^~-^--<-^-? ^ l^.^u..a.l-t.^l..^u^^^—^-—^ -. ^t-^—^/-^— suid Distnct Maiiasaiuiuid(CCi) Versus 1 The State of Chhattisgarn, 'Ihrougtt : iecre •J» Di°Tt'^rtr^ i-j ^f a^fC-t-iL ^,i a i^ 2 3 4 Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CG) Under Secretary, Departinent ot Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(CGj 'I'he CoUector, Mahasamund, Uistrict Mab.&sam.usd (CG) Sub-Divisional OSice ( R ), Sub- DivisMn MaJiasaciund, District Maiiasauiuuu(<^ij) 5 Tahsildar, Matiasaiuund, Uistrict Mahasa33iuad(CG) 6 Saniay Shelkey, Patwari, P.C. No. 90, /T^'Ri^<3..i1 ^^f^T-ii'-io'^-mi-i-Ttri T^i-tcl+-n^-'+ .t-^^jit^a^L.^^^iLjUL-t^-L^ ^-J ^:^J ^--^v/ ^ Mausaniuna(<^Uj WRI.T PE-T!T!ON I"'!I..E-D UNDBR AKTICLE 22-6 OF THB CONSTITUTIGN OF' iIiDIA Sliri Raghavendra Pradhau , counsel for fhe Petitioner. Sbri Rakesh Jha, Dy. Goveniineat Advocate for the State. (14.07.20G8J Heard. The pentlQner, who is worktag oa the post ot' Patwari, has been transterred froin P.C. No. 83, R. i; Circle Mahasamund, I'ahsii, Sub-Division aad Districl- Matiasamund to P.C. No. 11, R.I. Circle Bhawarpur, Tahsil Basna, Sub-Division Saraipali, Distnct M^IiasaniundjCG). Leamecl counsel tbr Uie petitioner submits tliat date of birtti of the petitioner is 26.6.1949, thereby, he wiU be retiring ta the nionUi of Jiuie, 2009 aad theretbre, Uiis displaceiaent ot' ttie •'ff^Si.s.^ /',i'a«k, "'%. 'i' A " % "^8 I 4 •«.. ./ £> ^ ~yse:s".^ ''^^..^1- .-:<^'' W^P^!SiNO,364S/2uu8 petitioner at ttie verge of tlis retireinent is totalty agauist f&e poticy framed bv the Govemm.eut on 29th Mav, 2008 (Annexure P/31. He takes nie to clause 5.5.3 of the said policy aiid prays tor quaslunent ot the order ot traiister. On the ofher ttaad, leamed counsel tbr the State opposes fhese argum.ents. However, he also admits about tfae pohcv of tlie Govenunent, contained ia clause 5.5.3 r^ardiug not altectiiig the trausters ot Uie einployees, whoBe superaanuation is to be attected withia a penod ot one year or scine lesser perioct tnan tnat unless ttiey are sent to tlieir Iioine dis'.nct or an optton has been called troiu Uieiu. Considering fhe lacts and circuinstaiices of tJie case, particularly considenng the provisions ofclause 5.5.3 ot ttie policy, 1 deein it proper to dispose of the petinon wim a du-ection to tlie petitioner to tile a representation betbre me concenied authorit\r fbr taking decision on the sacae. Accordiiigly, the petition is disposed ot witu a direction that it' so advised, the petitioner luay lile a deraited representation before the concemed aufhority wifhin a period of 15 days froru toctay tbr settiiig aslde the order ot transter aiid ri such a representanon is liled, ttte concerued authority shaiidispose ot the sauie at the earliest, keeping iu mind, the poiicy 01 ttie Govemiaent. It is turmer directed f&at till ttie decision on tne representation is taken, tlie on'.er of traaster shall not be given ettect to. The petition stands tiiiauy disposed ot. ——-- SdJ- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge :;';,^'*Wi.^^ita .<i..,fca^. l.j|,j^|