BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14425 of 2011 1 EASWARAN 2 L. SHANKAR ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 and 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTY WEST POLICE STATION, CR NO. 1050/2011, TUTICORIND DT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 & A2 facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.1050 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, have come forward with this application, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners/accused demanded a sum of Rs.100/- for the compensation for damaged glass of their auto rickshaw and continuously beaten and threatened the de-facto complainant, as a result of which, a case has been registered against them and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ antecedents against the petitioners. He further submits that the injured was treated Only as out patient. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatty, Tuticorin and each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KOVILPATTY, THOOTHUKUDI DIST 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTY WEST POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DT 1. CC to M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate SR.No.38366: DM::2011:NOVEMBER:10:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14425 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 1P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/