IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17135 of 2010 PRAMOD PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner husband in a complaint case under Sections 323, 406, 498A and 504 of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act is of willingness to revive matrimonial harmony. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of six months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Rosra at Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 424/08. On the date that he surrenders, notice shall be issued to the complainant. Any application for regular bail after expiry of six months is to be considered by the Court below on its own merits, in light of the guidelines laid down by this 2 Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters when naturally the respective conduct of the parties shall have to be borne in mind by the Court below based on its own assessment of their respective conduct, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)