IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14827 of 2009 Date of Decision : 19.1.2010 Geeta Devi .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.C.M.Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 30.4.2007 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.5 whereby the retiral benefits including death-cum-retirement gratuity admissible to the deceased husband of the petitioner, have been with-held. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties contend that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision of this Court dated 27.5.2009 rendered in a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.5568 of 2008 (Charan Dass and others versus State of Punjab and others). C.W.P.No . 14827 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of CWP No.5568 of 2008 (Charan Dass and others versus State of Punjab and others). Dasti. 19-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE