IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 462 of 2005 Date of decision: November 19, 2010 Anokh Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Haryana for the respondent A.N. Jindal, J The order dated 26.9.2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal was challenged by way of revisoin. However, during the course of arguments, learned counsel has not challenged the legalilty, validity and propriety of the order but has prayed that the petitioner could not comply with the order within stipulated period, therefore, he was taken into custody. One of the terms of the order was that the petitioner would pay a sum of Rs.5000/- to the complainant as compensation, as such, he was taken into custody, therefore, he may be allowed to deposit the compensation. Thus, taking stock of the circumstances prevailing over the case, this revision petition is dismissed with the further direction that the accused would comply with the terms of the order dated 26.9.2003 within two months from today failing which the order passed by the Appellate Court shall come into operation. November 19, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge