IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7152 of 2010 1. RUBI KUMARI D/O KRISHNA MAHTO R/O VILL.- AFANI, P.S. ARIYARI, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SHEIKHPURA, SHEIKHPURA 5. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, SHEIKHPURA, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 6. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER SHEIKHPURA, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 7. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION - CUM - PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR SHEIKHPURA, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BLOCK ARIYARI, P.S. ARIYARI, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 9. THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, SHEIKHPURA, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 10. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER BLOCK ARIYARI, P.S. ARIYARI, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 11. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT ARIYARI P.S.- ARIYARI, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA 12. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT ARIYARI, BLOCK ARIYARI, P.S.- ARIYARI, DISTT.- SHEIKHPURA ----------- 2 19/01/2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, the Court can well understand the predicament of the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority in absence of appropriate papers having been produced before him for - 2 - adjudication. However, in case the original documents which are pending before the Curt of the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a criminal matter arising out of the same transaction is made available to the Appellate Authority, the matter may be re-looked into and adjudicated. This writ application is disposed of with the observation aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)