1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA Second Appeal No.22 of 2010 Shri Anandu alias Sadashiv S. Devidas age 52 years, House no.4, Mudkud, Agonda, Canacona,Goa. ..... Appellant. V e r s u s 1. Shri Mhablu Tambdo Vagonkar, since deceased through his heirs, a) Smt. Premavati Mhablu Vagonkar, major in age, housewife, b) Master Umesh Mhablu Vagonkar, Residing in the company of his mother,both residing at House no.4 Chapolim, Canacona. ...... Respondents. Mr. M. Amonkar, Advocate for the Appellant. None for the respondents. Coram: A.P. Lavande, J. Date: 19th November, 2010. Order: By this Second Appeal, the appellant challenges judgment and decree dated 6/11/2009 passed by the District Judge- I, South Goa, Margao, in Regular Civil Appeal No.32/2009 dismissing the appeal filed against judgment and decree dated 31/1/2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division at Canacona 2 in Regular Civil Suit No.18 of 1997 whereby the suit of the appellant/plaintiff filed against the respondent/defendant seeking permanent and mandatory injunction was dismissed. 2. The Trial Court held that the appellant had not proved his title or possession to the suit and consequently dismissed the suit. The lower appellate Court held that the appellant/plaintiff failed to prove possession of the suit property and that the defendant had carried out construction in the suit property. 3. In my opinion, the findings recorded by the lower Appellate Court are clearly borne out from the evidence on record and cannot be said to be perverse. In any case, no substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal and hence the appeal is dismissed. A. P. Lavande, J. Ap/-