CMPMO No.556/2008 CMP No.896/2008 26.8.2009 Present: Mr. J. R. Poswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Thakur, Addl. A.G with Mr. J. S. Rana, Asstt.A.G. for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Y. Paul, Advocate for respondent No.3. The petitioner is aggrieved of the notice (Annexure P-3) issued by the office of the Divisional Commissioner, Mandi Division, Mandi, informing him of the date fixed for reviewing the earlier order dated 22.7.2008 passed by the Divisional Commissioner in Misc. Appeal No.274/2008, titled as Saroj Kumari v. Kamlesh Kumari & Ors. The petitioner herein filed an appeal against the order dated 29.2.2008 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Bilaspur, H.P. in Case No.S-254/07 titled as Kamlesh Kumari vs. Saroj Kumari, whereby her appointment as Anganwari Worker was set-aside. In the appeal, the Divisional Commissioner set-aside the said order and directed the Child Development and Project Officer-cum-Secretary, respondent No.3 therein to start the process of filling-up the post through fresh interview. Admittedly, there is no power of review with the Divisional Commissioner. Since the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner was quasi judicial in nature, hence unless and until there is a statutory power of review, the same could not have been sought to be reviewed by virtue of inherent powers, if any. The Divisional Commissioner cannot review his own order in the instant case. Under the circumstances, the action initiated by the Divisional Commissioner is illegal and accordingly Annexure P-3 is quashed. The petition is allowed and disposed of with the aforesaid observations, so also the pending application. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. August 26, 2009 (rana)