THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.846 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.8939 of 2008 alleging that his case was not considered against the vacancies notified in 2006 on the ground that he did not clear the pole-climbing test. The writ petition was disposed of on 22.04.2008 expressing the view that the interviews for the post notified in 2006 were concluded in the first week of June 2007 and that no relief can be granted to the petitioner vis-à-vis the said vacancies. It was, however, observed that as and when the respondents undertake appointment or selection of Junior Linemen, the case of the petitioner shall also be considered in accordance with the directions issued earlier. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not comply with the directions issued by this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner is not able to state as to how the respondents have committed contempt of Court. It is only when any specific parameter stipulated for the post is violated by the respondents that contempt can be said to have been committed. This Court does not find any merit in the contempt case. Hence, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 27.12.2011. kdl