IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.546 of 2005 NANDJEE CHOUBEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 19.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by termination of his services as a Teacher by order dated 3.12.2004 at Annexure 19. On facts, it appears that the termination followed after show cause notice and reply to the same. Be that as it may, this Court does not consider it proper to take note of the facts of the case any more than necessary for the purpose of the present order so as not to prejudice case of either party in view of nature of the order proposed to be passed. Learned Counsel for the parties are not at issue over statement in paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit of the State that cases of persons situated like the petitioner have been referred to a Committee constituted under the orders of this Court in LPA No. 1211 of 2005 disposed on 11.1.2007 and analogous cases for examination of validity and correctness of the appointments. This writ application is disposed off in like terms for examining the validity of appointment of the petitioner. For that limited purpose the order of termination of the petitioner dated 3.12.2004 is accordingly set aside. This shall not result in his immediate reinstatement but the issue of reinstatement shall abide by final recommendation of the Committee with regard to the petitioner. Let this exercise for examination and recommendation by the Committee with regard top the petitioner be completed within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)