CWP No. 2519 of 2009. 27.7.2009 Present: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.1. CMP No. 4922 of 2009: Allowed. CWP No. 2519 of 2009: This petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties at the admission stage. The controversy can be narrowed down by making specific reference to Annexure P-35 dated 27.5.2009. The relevant text of the letter reads thus: “NPPA further notes from the information submitted by your company on production and sales of the formulation, duly certified by a Chartered Accountant that it is not in a prescribed proforma. It is noted that the date of manufacture of respective batches is not mentioned in respect of both the companies i.e. M/s Mapro Pharmaceutical Ltd. and M/s Swiss Garnier Lifescience Ltd. Further, the information on sales of the formulation has been desired by NPPA specifically from the date of notification onwards i.e. from 23.03.2007 till date. The certificate submitted by you does not indicate the period to which the quantities of sales relates. Therefore, a revised certificate indicating complete details of the sales of the formulation from 23.03.2007 onwards including the Batch No. and batch date may be furnished to NPPA at the time of personal hearing.” It is borne out from the records that the petitioner No.2 was to be personally heard on 3.6.2009. However, it informed the Director (Legal) that since the Officers were pre-occupied, personal hearing be either granted on 10.6.2009 or on any other date after 10.6.2009. In these circumstances, we are of the considered view that interest of justice will suffice if petitioner No.2 complies with Annexure P-35 in letter and spirit and thereafter, the respondents fix the date for personal hearing. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to petitioner No.2 to supply information to the respondents as per Annexure P-35 within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter, the date shall be fixed by the respondents for personal hearing. It is made clear that petitioner No.2 shall not seek any adjournment and the matter shall be finally heard on the date fixed by the respondents. We further direct that till the final hearing is accorded to the petitioner No. 2, the respondents shall not adopt any coercive measures against it. No costs. CMP No. 4923 of 2009: In view of the disposal of the main petition, this application also stands disposed of. Copy ‘Dasti’ on usual terms. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 27, 2009. (cr)