1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4782/2009 (Ambadas Mulaji Dahatonde and another ..vs.. Nilkanth A. Dahatonde and others) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- NOVEMBER 07, 2009 Contention of Advocate Shri V.N.Patil on behalf of Judgment Debtor is that, unless and untill Gut numbers are first corrected, decree for possession cannot be executed. The objection on these lines has been rejected by the executing court after noticing that there was no direction to correct gut numbers first. With the assistance of learned Advocate, I have perused the record. The judgment and decree sought to be executed clearly shows that the decree has been drawn with reference to plaint map, which makes reference to Gut numbers as obtaining today. The decree is sought to be executed accordingly. It is, therefore, apparent that the property is identifiable and decree can be executed. 2 In the circumstances, no case is made out warranting interference in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE Diwale.