CRR No.2166 of 2011(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.50485 of 2011 in/and CRR No.2166 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.10.2011 Mohinder Singh and another ...... Petitioners v. State of Punjab ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. S.S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) CRM No.50485 of 2011 For the reasons recorded, application is allowed. Delay of 8 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. CRR No.2166 of 2011 (O&M) This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 31.05.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the prayer of the petitioners for staying the examination of the DSP Hardev Singh on the ground that in a private complaint the said person had been CRR No.2166 of 2011(O&M) ::2:: summoned as an accused, was declined by noticing that one of the co- accused in the criminal complaint had filed a revision which was pending. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that with regard to the death of Hardeep Singh and his family members there were two versions and the said versions should be tried together. He has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Pal @ Palla v. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2010 (4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 511. Learned Deputy Advocate General has fairly stated that even though there is no cause for amalgamation of the two causes yet it would be appropriate if both the versions are tried by the same judicial officer and even though evidence may be taken separately in each, yet final order should be co-terminus. In this view of the matter, there is no ground to interfere with the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed. It is however clarified that final order would not be passed in the trial related to the FIR No.244/04 till such time as the final order in the private complaint is not passed and both the cases would be decided by the same Court. ( AJAY TEWARI ) October 12, 2011 JUDGE ashish