IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10753 of 2009 NEELAM PRINTERS AND GENERAL ORDER SUPPLIER, NEAR RAILWAY RESERVATION COUNTER, OLD G. T. ROAD, P. S. – AURANGABAD, DISTRICT – AURANGABAD, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, NAMELY, NEELAM DEVI, W/O. SATYENDRA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – DIHRA, P.S. – OBRA, DISTRICT – AURANGABAD ……………………. PETITIONER. Versus 1. MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, GAYA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, GAYA. 3. SACHCHIDANAND SINHA COLLEGE, AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, SACHCHIDANAND SINHA, COLLEGE, AURANGABAD. 5. THE PURCHASE COMMITTEE, SACHCHIDANAND SINHA COLLEGE, AURANGABAD THORUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. ……………………. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02/ 28.08.2009 The petitioner prays for quashing the Letter bearing No. SSC 269 of 2009 dated 25.07.2009 issued by the Principal, S. N. Sinha College, Aurangabad whereby direction has been issued to the petitioner to return Rs.2,20,000/- along with bank interest immediately. The petitioner was selected for supplying printed materials for which an order was passed on him by Letter No. SSC/AO/14/2008 dated 15.10.2008 and an advance of Rs.2,20,000/- was also given. The petitioner purchased papers and board as prescribed, however the corrected prospectus and admission forms were not made available. The petitioner filed a petition to the aforesaid effect on 25.11.2008 to the Principal. 2 On 08.04.2009 the Principal directed the petitioner to collect the modified prospectus from the office. After collecting the modified prospectus, the petitioner printed fifteen thousand prospectus and forms. The petitioner, in the mean time, received a letter dated 23.05.2009 from the Principal asking him to supply prospectus and forms only to the extent of the advance paid. The petitioner vide his letter dated 25.05.2009 informed the Principal that already fifteen thousand prospectus and forms have been printed. The aforesaid printed materials were sent through parcel on 12.06.2009. The office of the Principal refused to accept the parcel and the impugned letter has been issued for refunding the advance amount tendered to him. The petitioner in this respect has made representation to respondent no. 2, the Vice Chancellor Magadh University, Bodh Gaya at Gaya. The representation is contained in Annexure – 10. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court observes that if the petitioner again files fresh representation before the Vice-Chancellor of the University, he would dispose of the same preferably within six weeks from the date of the receipt of the same by speaking order. The 3 representation must be filed within three weeks from today. Till the disposal of the representation the annexure 11 is stayed. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application is disposed of. kundan (S. P. Singh, J.)