IN THE HIGH comm or ‘wnIcAwaE AT JABALPvR mm PETITIm‘ No; (06 L/ OF 1999 Makhan sav sahu 5/0 sud. amatram sahu,‘ aged ;&apora’;§f,/'Disa, about 3g, years}? 30,1159”, resiamt of wllage ané , may Madhav about 30 Das yegrsif Rai pagi residmt yo smdev of village Dasr mragiiaged and Est d1apora."?_ vi§1anber sahu s/o sonauram 3O yearsx resid&t of villag sahu; ageda about e and ,Post‘Nawapara‘*; i / o, years; om; r/o mamar mllage yo mintram and kst $atrang,~‘aged dahote Seepatjg obout 30 Mangal years; :f/e has village yd Mahesh and Ran Post mardwaj,aged Baruaota$§ about 3 2 Uttan y/Q village mars/o and mat Lachhiram-duguhan,aged §1atora§i§ 31 yearsi o/o *mrém village 3’° Ragh‘mandm and zost agho mardwai%aged mtg? 29 years;'1 pesidat Jharig‘lu Ram of village yo muman and Post mute Namp’grag’i aged about 30 years.;': m Ahnya we aohini chand mars. aged about 27 years, r/o village ana ‘Pbst aaarparag‘? Am®xishore yolm&1oraé sida ‘ years£ r/o village and Bast N O / e a §i d about 3e; re Pmmxmms my me mime we: ch o Diwfict Janigir mampa (MP . " anpad Padchayat Malkharoda; Ehrough its Janjqi: mief keeutive diamPa (341’). Offlcer Malkhamda‘mstrict i m 0 r a é XI~HC-22 mm m 13-03-2002 Shn' Prashant Mishra, Advoeate for the petitioners. Shri Gautham Bhadun', G.A1 None for mspondent No.2. Heard. i Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Janpad Panchayat has selected Siksha Kannis. So far aé petitioners ale concerned, they were in the waiting list. The persons who wexe selected and appointed joined their services. But, thereafter, the Coilwtor cancelled the appointment. On such cancellation being made y the Collector in respect of those candidates they pmferred a Writ tition No.5l73/ 1998 and in the same / petition interim order had been p‘ sed and the petitioners in that petition axecontinuing. It is pointed out that sin certain persons had not joined their services, Janpad Panchayat pa. recommending the names of the ,piesent petitioners to the Chief Executive O$cen The said Older has not b€ present §e1i1ion has been $ed. for mspondent No. 1. {111%W sed a msolution dated 26-09-1998 :en complied with and against that the m learned counsel for the S te pointed out that the representau'ons (Annexums P - 4 and P - 5) have een made to the Chief Executive omcer, Janpad Panchayat, but not to the Having considered the fa ts and circumstances and material available on xecotd and Without ‘xplessing further on the meiits of the caserof the rival panics, in the opmion of this Couxt, it would be just and proper to give an opportunity t) the petitioners to- make a detailed representation alongwith the docir nents to the appropriate authority and if suc'h‘a mpxesentation is made within'a month; and 1f tequimd, the petiu'oners and any opposite party may be. heard either personally or through their counsel, the same shall be decided as early as possible preferably Within a period of three months h‘om the date of receipt of the mpmsentatioil. If any adverse onier is passed, the parties are at liberty t5 J challrnge a&esh. With the afolesaid obselvah‘o‘ns, this petition is dis‘posed of at this sfage. _ Ccrh‘&d photocopy as per rulb x Sd/- V Fakhruddin Judge mwwwm “mm llsctor or the State Government. /