1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10279/2009 Bhag Chand vs Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. AND S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10280/2009 Sarveshwar Lal vs Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 7.12.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Arjun Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikaram Choudhary, for the respondent <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. Though the writ petitions have been listed as the respondents submitted applications under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India, but the facts disclosed clearly reveal that petitioners were originally transferred vide order dated 23rd Oct., 2009 and in that order it is mentioned that petitioners shall not be entitled to usual TA as they were transferred on their own request, but the respondents have placed on record copy of the order of the same date 23rd Oct., 2009 (Annex.R/3) by which the original order of transfer Annex.1 was modified. From this corrigendum it is 2 made clear that petitioners shall be entitled to the transfer allowances as per the rules. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the corrigendum dated 23rd Oct., 2009 is anti-dated as the petitioners were relieved on 29th Oct., 2009 treating them to be transferred on their request which is clear from Annex.R/3. The argument of the petitioners is factually not correct as the corrigendum was received by the concerned persons only on 9th Nov., 2009 and before that they were relieved, therefore, Annex.R/3 cannot help the petitioners in any manner. In view of the above reasons, the writ petitions of the petitioners are dismissed and the interim orders passed by this court on 4.11.2009 are also vacated. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-