^r i<n(^ 5 •nBle'Bencft INTHEHIGHCQURTQFJ:HI!ATTISGARHATBILASPUR W.R^NO. ^3^^ ^2010 PETmONER RESPONDENTS p/'./' ^ ^ .•* ^^f>'""y y ^ ..^y ^•^^x<0' •^y^ •^>-''".:- ^ LSUS Bhisham Singh Ra^e S/o Anjor Smgh Rawte Aged about 40 years, Upper Dndsion Teacher, Govemment Middle Scliool Ssran.gpmkala, Block- B odla, Distt. Kabirdham- (C.0.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education officer, Distt.Kabird]iam-(C.G.) 3. Block Education officsr, Bodla, Dislt.Kabirdliam- (C.G.) v WRIT PETITION VSA 226m7 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA F -%PHC—7S ^SN^IS ^HI^i' TS? ^i^Krl^i, •e$ti1'(-)4l<o, 'f^TRT^; ...W'..(?.:..Lfe)..^;...^..^^ico -W^T 'q^r (^t3^r) w^T'^T'^rw TW W^T F^T^R ^'ft^ SB : HON»BLEMR. JUSTICE PR 29.10.2010 Shri Somkant Venna, coun ShriVivek Sharma, P.L, foi The petitioner, who was Assistant Teacher under the Sc] 23.08.94 (Annexure P/l) is ag respondents iii not addiag two QL^ even though he did his D,Ed. f^ Board, Raipur at his own cost] seekiag permission for ftie same >el tbr fhe petitioner. ItheState. appointed cn the post of |ool Education Depattment on ^rieved by the action of tiie }va5ice iricrexnents in his salary S-om C*G, Ma.dhyamik Shiksha in fh.e year June 2005 after ti*oin tlie departjriesit. Coiinsel for the petitioner| entided for two advaace incremj Exaiiiiiiation ceitificate, 111 Circular dated 24.12.98 aad m v| Siipreme Court ia tbe lastter o| BadrmaraYan Achar\7a and otN an.cl Yashwajit Ku-mar Bhardwj Durg and another reported in 20| counlsel On tlie other haad, erstwhile State of Madhya 22.10.1964 aHowed advance govemment servaots who pij 22.10.1964 whether at his own How^y^rr wt(p proceeded on traij ^Rfe^ ^T^f ^ fezt T^§K ^'^fNs^ TINKBR DIWAKER |sixbm.its fh..a.t liie petitioner is m.ts as he had obt^iiied D,Ed accc|rdaiice wifh. tlie provisions of |ew of the ju.dgmen-ts of Honlle State of M.P. & Another Vs. ^rs repbrted m 1996 SC 2779 y Vs. Municipal Coi'poration, )6 (irj MPJR 96 (CG). for the State submit.s th.at >radesb vide circulai' dated incremente • only to fhose >ceeded for. traiaing u.p to lost or a.t the goveniinent cost, ing on or after 23, 10.1964 cau fi ^rsss:k ^ /r€ 'f R&%^ r "^:^y -XI.HC—78 '3'^T r^i^S<r)^ ^ftWT^, f^^iwy ..\^^l^l..^M^t 3T?^?T 'q^? ('TI^3^^) ^T^T'^T'f^Nr ^^TSH^T^^W l^rrw^^^¥r Goveniimexit get two ajin'o.al iacrem.ents only not at the cost of the 23.10.1964 was superceded vid| Govem.raent vide xiotiification Non-Gazette Class-II Educationa|l RecruitBient aad Promotion Ru|€ B.T.I. or B.Ed degrce for Teacher. The petitioner woi^Id iricrexnents only in tlie condil B.T.I/B.Ed./B.T.I. degree at hi;| obtauiiiiR pensiission fomi the to 1.3.99. To clarifv the above been issued on 6.2.2007 aiid onj appoi4tment Facts, as detailed above, the inatter of Yashwan.f Kziinait discussmg the cu'culars datedj upon tbe judgment of the Hon>|: Badrinarayan Acha^a's case 3iot assistaiit teachers alone, iacrements on obtaming B.E(ji 22.10.1964, as th.e circular| prescribe any outer limit oftlie| & B,TJ. certiiicate. It ha.s beenl 1.3.99 is applicable to only Ass^ other teachers (UDT). ^i^{<r34il 'WT^ff ^ f^st Tf^T^R ^37RW3?T^T jfa tli.e trahimg is at his cost auid niim.exit, This circular of dated |e order dated 10.12.1975. The djated 16.6.1973 ameaded M.P. Services (Non-college Services) ?s, 1993 added quallficatioii of on tlie post of Assistarit be entitled for a.d.van.ce lon fhat he Iiad obtaiaed. iiis own cost dumig seryice alter 4epartjiient between 23,10.1964 t>osition, circule^rs have aJready 130.1.09. 4re not in dispute. This Court in Bharadwaj (szipra) elaborately 24.12.98, 1.3.99 axid rclying ble Apex Court in the matter of supra) has held tfaat teachers, be entitled to fr^o advauce exainiriation certificate after dated 22.10.1964 does not period ofobtammg B,Ed, M.Ed fuither held fhat circular dated .stant Teachers (LDT) and not to wbuld ^ -^ XI-HC—78 HWWt «iHI^ ^ST r^i^i(n^, ^til-M^Ko, '[®ldl^l|< ..^^.L€>...^.L^&1^ S^?{ "q^T ('^f^3^) ^ni^ ^r l^i^- ^STT ^S^ W^ i'RTT^T IT^H 3Tr^T T Shri Sharma fairly subraits ia Yashwaat Kiiraar Bharadwaj finaMty axid ca.se ofthe petitioner ^n. tliis petition is also squai'ely covered by tiie above judgni^nt as also circiilar dated 24.12.1998. ^f 'WT^ff ^* fe^ '<f^{^R ^^tRwa^T that principle of law laid dowu 's case (supra) has attaiued For fhe albresaid reasons^ payraent oftwo advaace increiriexj of the petitioner's D.Ed. exaiiiin^tion result The respondents are accordiiigly directed to ni^ increinents to the petitioner froij| examrEiatioji, withiu a period However, fhis order shall be subi fhe State regardiag facts pleadedj No order as to costs. :he petitioB.er is entitled to fh.e ts froin the date of declax'ation jke paynieBt of two advance the date ofher passiiig D.Ed. |of four montlis from today. lect to aU. veiifications inade by iii the petition, ^' ,^ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge