w.P.( s mo. M% mm 20/0 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE PETITIONERS VERSUS ESPONDENTS / 1. CLF‘LZM/W / ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR - me.) _ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. eevdhar Ram Sahu S/o— Dukhuram aged about 55 years, Assistant Teacher posted at Primary School Korampara. (Amoda) Block— Narharpur, District~ Kanker (C.G.) 2. Gopal Singh Dhruv, S/o aged about ,._ years, Assistant Teacher posted at Primary School Dhourabhata, Biock— Narharpur, District— Kanker (C.G.) I State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. District Education Ofhcér, District— Kanker (C.G.) Biock Education Officer, Block- Narharpur, District- Kanker (C.G.) R J HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinqle Bench: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. WRIT PETITION (S) NO.403912010 PETITIONERS Jeevdhar Ram Sahu and another Versus State of Chhattisga'rh and Othels WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA Present: - Shri F. S. Khare‘ counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State 0n advance copy, RESPONDENT$ ~ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 02"“ of August, 2010) The petitioners were initiatiy appointed as Deputy Teacher in the year 1974 in the Education Department on a fixed pay of Rs.100/—. After comptetion of probation period, they were granted reguiar pay scaie. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners suhmittedgthat the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitied to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initiaf appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745l89 (Madhukant Yadu and 5o Others V. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the TeachersfAssistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Q50 4. Learned counsel- appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court. while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others v. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Another, W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007, by arder dated 12/02/2007, has granted reguiar pay scale with effect from the date‘of initial appointment. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu (supra). 6. in View of that, this petition is allowed on the same terms, subject to verification of the facts. No order as to costs. 4E") /’¢—~'# ""‘ a“ sdj- li Manindra Mohan ShriVaStava :v Judge ’M‘rrrsw W 7M (iviw ,. Tumane 54 rra. .