-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4633 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.4633 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.4633 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.2731 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.2731 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.2731 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Ketan Parekh i/b M/s.K.R.Parekh & Co. for the Applicant Mr.J.J.Xavier for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 10,2007. : JANUARY 10,2007. : JANUARY 10,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicant. By the impugned Judgment and Order, Appeal under section 217 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 preferred by the Applicant has been dismissed. The Appeal relates to the recovery of octroi. Therefore, interim relief cannot be granted after statutory Appeal is dismissed. Application is rejected. However, all further payments made by the Applicant will be subject to final outcome of the Appeal. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE