HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.24644 of 2001 Date: November 25, 2010 Between: G. Venkat Rami Reddi. … Petitioner And 1. The Divisional Manager, L.I.C. of India, Karimnagar Division, Karimnagar and another. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.24644 of 2001 ORDER: The petitioner filed the writ petition for issuing appropriate writ directing the respondents to verify the records in respect of the claims made by the petitioner for the appraisal years 1991 to 1999 and pay incentive bonus and additional conveyance allowance after adjusting the advance amount of Rs.96,000/- already paid by deducting the same from the amounts payable to the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is claiming incentive bonus and additional conveyance allowance on the new business procured by him through his agency force on the premiums received by the Corporation for the first year from the policy holders. He made his claim from 1991 to 1993 amounting to Rs.3.00 lakhs and the respondents have paid Rs.96,000/- as an advance on random verification. Subsequently, the petitioner had made a representation in the year 1996 for payment of remaining incentive bonus and additional conveyance allowance by deducting the advance already paid to him. As the matters stood thus, the petitioner retired from service on 30.6.2001 on attaining the age of superannuation. Respondent No.2 has informed the petitioner about the amounts payable on his terminal benefits after deducting Rs.96,000/-. The petitioner is questioning about deducting of said Rs.96,000/- and also claimed difference of incentive bonus and additional conveyance allowance. 3. The respondents have filed their counter enclosing the statement showing the amounts payable to the petitioner under the heads incentive bonus and additional conveyance allowance mentioned in Ex.R-1. As per the said statement the incentive bonus and additional conveyance allowance payable to the petitioner is Rs.41,825-29 ps. The respondents also further stated that the amounts payable by them towards terminal benefits under the heads additional gratuity, privilege leave encashment and also the amount recovered from the petitioner came to Rs.2,69,631/- and accordingly they have sent a cheque for the said amount on 12.7.2001 by speed post. But, the same was returned undelivered with a remark that ‘addressee refused to accept’ and returned to sender. After receipt of the said letter, they kept the amount under Suspense Account and they are prepared to pay the amounts payable towards terminal benefits in Ex.R-2. 4. The petitioner counsel has not filed any objections questioning the correctness of the statements Exs.R-1 and R-2 filed by the respondents. Now, the petitioner counsel admits the amounts mentioned in Exs.R-1 and R-2 and requested for issuance of a direction to the respondents for making the said payments to him. The respondent counsel has pleaded that the petitioner may furnish his address so that they can send amounts to the petitioner by way of demand draft. 5. Hence, the respondents are directed to make the payments of the amounts due to the petitioner as mentioned in Exs.R-1 and R-2 by way of demand draft on petitioner furnishing his address within a period of two weeks. 6. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J Date: November 25, 2010. BSB