-£^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAm^SARH AT BILASPUR CivU Revisioa No. 112 of 2010 APPLICANT/ Election petitioner BON-APPLICABTS VBRSUS 1. 2. 3. Mohaadas Chandnaiu, aged about 51 years, S/o Shri Devidia Chaiidnaiu R/o Gurananak Ward No. 10, TUda Nevra, District Raiptir(C.G.). Ram Panjwani, aged about 46 years, S/o Gopichaud Panjwaoi, Elected Vicc President, Nagar Palika Parishad, TUda Nevra, District Raipur (C.G.). Chief Munieipal Officer, N^ar Palika Parishad, Tilda Nevra, Dtetrict Raipur (C.G.). Additional CoUector & Distnct Rettmaiag OfBcer, Local Election Raipur(C.G,), CIVIL REVISION UNDBR 8BCTION 26(2t OP CHHATTI8GARH MUNICIPALITIES ACT. 1961 R/W RULE 19 OF CHHATnSGARH MUNICIPALITIES ffiLECTION PETITION1 RULBS. 1962. (SB -.Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.( Present : - Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Rakesh Jha, Dy. G.A. for the State. ORAL-ORDER (Passedoa 29/10/20l0) 1. By fhis civil revision applicaat has challenged the legaUty and property of order dated 12/8/10 passed by District Judge, Raipur in unregistered election petition ffled agaiast the election of fhe councilor under Sectioa 22 ofthe C.G. Muiiicipalities Act, 1961. 2, Order iiupugned perused. 3. Tinie barred appUcation field on behalf of the appUcant along wifh appUcatlon imder Sectfon 5 of fhe Limitation Act for condonation of delay iu filmg such application has been dismissed by tfae District Judge Raipur. There is uo scope of condonation of delay in filing of origmal petition or suit, I do not find auy iUegality in the order impugned requuiag aay iaterference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. Consequenfty, civil revision is Uable to be dismissed aad is hereby disniissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge <(-