IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SUO-MOTU SUO-MOTU SUO-MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 199 OF 1991. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 199 OF 1991. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 199 OF 1991. High Court. ... Petitioner. Versus. Bank of Baroda, Ratnagiri. ... Respondent. None for the Petitioner. Ms.Alpa Zaveri i/by Ms.Teja Katdare for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 21st June, 2007. : 21st June, 2007. : 21st June, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Respondent/Contemnor. Shri M.M.Sanadi, an Officer of the Contemnor has filed an affidavit-in-reply. In the said affidavit, it is stated that a sum of Rs.2,50,095/- has been deposited by the Contemnor in the trial Court by Banker’s cheque. A zerox copy of the banker’s cheque has been annexed to the said reply. 2. The Contemnor is the 2nd Defendant in a civil suit in which a money decree was passed. An Appeal was preferred by the contemnor in which a conditional stay was granted. A notice of contempt was issued as the decretal amount was not deposited as per the order dated 23rd January 2001 passed in Civil Application No.8756 of 1999. Now there is a substantial compliance made by the contemnor. In view of this position, the contempt notice issued by this Court is discharged. Contempt petition is disposed of. : 2 : 2 : 2 : Judge. Judge. Judge.