IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13189 OF 2000 Between: 1 The Superintending Engineer (Civil) Head Quarters, Ministry of Communications, Department of Posts, Dak Bhavan, New Delhi. 2 The Architect, Postal, Hyderabad. 3 The Accounts Officer, O/o.Executive Engineer, Department of Posts, Government of India, Postal Civil Division, Hyderabad. 4 The Senior Architect (Postal), Mumbai. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Smt.K.Janani O/o.Architect, Department of Posts, 6th Floor, Dak Sadan, Hyderabad. 2 V.Jhansi Rani O/o.Architect, Department of Posts, 6th Floor, Dak Sadan, Hyderabad. 3 M.Padmaja O/o.Architect, Department of Posts, 6th Floor, Dak Sadan, Hyderabad. 4 E.Mangalageetha O/o.Architect, Department of Posts, 6th Floor, Dak Sadan, Hyderabad. 5 Durdana Qauser O/o.Architect, Department of Posts, 6th Floor, Dak Sadan, Hyderabad. 6 Ch.Kishore Kumar O/o.Architect, Department of Posts, 6th Floor, Dak Sadan, Hyderabad. 7 Chief Architect, Telecom, Department of Telecom, Architectura Division, Nungambakkam Road, 7 Kushikumar Road, Hyderabad. 8 Sr.Architect, The Telecom Architectural Wing, Bholakpur, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate, writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Certiorari calling for records in O.A.No.485/2000 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the order Dt.29/3/2000 and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Counsel for the Respondent No.: DR.K.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice P. Swaroop Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed against the order dated 29-03-2000 in O.A. No.485 of 2000 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, whereby respondent Nos.1 to 6 herein, petitioners therein, were directed to be appointed in the Telecom Department, respondent No.8 herein – respondent No.3 therein. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for Central Government reports that after filing this writ petition, vacancies arose in the Telecom Department i.e. respondent Nos.7 and 8 herein and the respondent Nos.1 to 6 were absorbed in those posts. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the Central Government, the cause in this writ petition does not survive requiring any further adjudication and thus the petition has become infructuous. 4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 23, 2009. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J PV