THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22012 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent issued a notification inviting applications for selection of candidates to the post of Artisan Trainees. The petitioners submitted their applications. Their grievance is that the respondent has issued call letters even to those candidates, who did not qualify. The respondent filed a counter-affidavit. It is stated that out of three petitioners, only petitioner No.1 qualified in the examination and he too is outside the zone consideration in the list of merit. It is stated that even though any candidate, who is otherwise ineligible, is issued call letter, the same would be verified at the subsequent stages and no candidate, who does not possess the qualification, would be appointed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. Basically, the petitioners do not have any genuine cause of action as of now. The reason is that out of four petitioners, three failed in the written test and one is not within the area of consideration. Still, in case the respondent is considering the candidature of any person, who does not possess qualification, the petitioners do have a cause of action. The respondent, in a way, partly admits the allegation of the petitioners but submits that even if any person who does not hold qualification was called for the interview, his qualification would be verified at the subsequent stages and no candidate without qualification would be appointed. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of taking on record the statement made by the respondent in its counter-affidavit. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:27.09.2010. kdl