IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 5932 of 2008(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. SUBAIDA, W/O.BASHEER RUBEENA MANZIL, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O. VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 2. SRI.BASHEER S/O. MOIDEEN KUTTY , RUBEENA MANZIL, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O. VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. TAHSILDAR, VAIKOM TALUK VAIKOM. 2. TALUK SURVEYAR,VAIKOM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 5932 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 20, 2008 JUDGMENT Exts.P3 and P5 are the applications made by the petitioner to the 1st respondent for conducting a survey of the property mentioned therein. It is stated that pursuant to these applications, Exts.P6 and P7 notices were issued. However, the proceedings have not been completed. It is complaining the delay in completing the survey as applied for by the petitioner that this writ petition has been filed. 2. Having regard to the above facts, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 1st respondent shall take further action on Exts.P3 and P5 and complete the process as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. I also clarify that if the petitioner is to comply with any condition for carrying out the above direction , it shall be his obligation to do so within the time as specified by the 1st respondent. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE