IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 LA.App..No. 436 of 2009(D) ------------------------------- LAR.201/2005 of PRL.S.C.,THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT IN LAR ----------------------------------------------- THE GENERAL MANAGER, KSIDC, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT AND 1ST RESPONDENT IN LAR: ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. MAROLI MATHU VAYALIL HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD. 2. GOVT.OF KERALA REP. BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. SMT.T.T.JOSEPHINA, GOVT. PLEADER THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.436 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J There is no appearance for the respondent who have already been served with notice of the appeal preferred by the Requisitioning Authority. Sri.Sheejo Chacko, the learned counsel for the appellant draws our attention to the judgment of this Court in L.A.A.98/09 and connected cases, a copy of the judgment is also placed before us. 2. Having gone through the above judgment, we feel that the impugned judgment warrants interference. For the reasons stated in that judgment, we set aside the judgment and decree under appeal and remand L.A.R.201/05 to the Reference Court for fresh decision. The Reference Court will afford opportunity to both sides to adduce further evidence L. A. A. No.436 of 2009 -2- and will pass revised award on the basis of the evidence already on record and further evidence which comes to be on record. The Requisitioning Authority will place a copy of the common judgment in L.A.A.98/09 series before the Reference Court so as to enable the Reference Court to appreciate the reasons which weighed with this Court in that case. Refund the full court fee paid on the appeal memo to the counsel for the appellant. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE N. K. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE kns/-