1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 2 OF 2008 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGAITON NO. 117 OF 2005 Global Institute of Management Science ...Petitioner Versus Dinesh Kamat & Ors. ...Respondents Mrs. Bhargavan i/by M/s. Ratha Bhargavan & Associates for the Petitioner Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General, with Mr. Sameer Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2008 P.C.:- In Public Interest Litigation No. 117 of 2005, this Court passed an order on 30th January, 2008. A notice was issued to 14 institutions by the Government, and they had not filed a reply within the stipulated time. The notice given to them by the Government was as to why those institutions be not closed, as they were running without the requisite permission. One of those institutions is the Global Institute of Management Science, which has now filed this Review Petition. 2 2. On its own showing, the institution is offering some course in Catering, and submits that it need not have any permission from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). However, it is affiliated to a university. Therefore, the order passed by this Court should not apply to it. 3. After hearing the learned Associate Advocate General, we are of the view that let the matter be considered by the Government whether these institutions needed approval from AICTE or not, and the review petitioner may, therefore, file a representation before the Government within a week, and if such a representation is filed, the Government shall decide that on merit, unmindful of the order passed by this Court, within a period of two weeks thereafter. With this observation, this Review Petition is disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. SAYED, J.