IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 25.10.2010 C.R.No.6898 of 2010 (O&M) Smt. Sudesh ...Petitioner Versus Narender and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. S.S.Kharb, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved against an order passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal on 09.09.2010, whereby an application for release the amount of ` 2,99,409/- was dismissed, primarily for the reason that the agreement to sell dated 29.04.2010 does not bear even signatures of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon an agreement Annexure P-1. The said agreement shows the signatures of the petitioner. However, as per the findings recorded by the learned Tribunal the agreement does not bear the signatures, whereas the agreement produced before this Court bears the signatures of Smt. Sudesh-the present petitioner. In view of the said fact, the present revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move another application before the learned Tribunal pointing out that the agreement to sell bear the signatures of the petitioner and that she is entitled to seek the release of the amount. 25.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE