1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 2982/2007 (Roop Lal and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 19/7/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Sanjay Nahar for the petitioners. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. I have carefully gone through the first information report. In the FIR, the allegation is against Pyar Chand and his wife Lehari Bai. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have not been even challaned. The petitioner No.1 is father-in-law in relation and petitioner No.2 is brother of the husband of the deceased (Jeth). Both the petitioners are living separately as the deceased and her husband used to live in different house at different place. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Roop Lal S/o Bhajja Kumawat and Gopi Lal S/o Pyar Chand Kumawat be released on bail in FIR No. 45/07 P.S. Raipur, district Bhilwara, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound 2 and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP