... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.70 OF 2006 Gurupad Mayappa Pujari & Anr. ...Applicants Vs. Amanna Ramsidha Pujari (Deceased) through legal representatives & Ors. ...Respondents Mr Amit Borkar for the Applicants. Mr P.M. Arjunwadkar for the Respondents. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : APRIL 04, 2006. DATE : APRIL 04, 2006. DATE : APRIL 04, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Shri Arjunwadkar waives service for the Respondents. Taken up for hearing forthwith. Shri Borkar appearing for the Applicants/Appellants pointed out that an Application for interim relief was made by the Appellants in the First Appellate Court which was disposed of by order dated 20th March, 2004. He stated that the said order was operating till the disposal of the Appeal. 2. By order dated 20th March, 2004, the District Court directed that both the Appellants and the Respondents should have right of common worship during fifteen days of ‘navratri’ festival and ‘yatra’ ... 2 ... festival respectively. 3. The District Court directed that the rest of period of eleven months will be shared equally. There is no reason why the same arrangement should not be continued till the final disposal of the Second Appeal. 4. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by directing that the interim arrangement made by the First Appellate Court during the pendency of the Civil Appeal No.77 of 2000 (Civil Appeal No.60 of 2004) will continue to operate till the final disposal of the Second Appeal. 5. No orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE