1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR M.C.A. No. 95 OF 2009 (In F. A. No. 35 OF 2008) Navneet s/o Sadashiv Temburnikar v. Mohd. Anwar Khan (Dead thr. L.Rs.) & anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs. R.V. Kaliya Advocate for the Appellant. .... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 02 nd MAY, 2009. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the First Appeal was dismissed as the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 could not be served. She further submits that the appellant made several efforts to trace out the address of legal representatives but the address has not been traced out and therefore by separate application she applied for permission to serve the legal 2 representatives by substituted service. For the reasons stated in the application order dated 10.12.2008 is set aside. F.A. No. 35/08 is restored to file. C.A. for restoration stands disposed of. C.A. No. 428/09 This is an application for substituted service. Having heard learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons stated in para 2 of the application, I am satisfied that good reasons exist to serve legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 by substituted service. Hence, this application is allowed in terms of its prayer clause. C.A disposed of. Service be made within 12 weeks from today. JUDGE /TA/