y HiGH COURT QF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR DMSSON BENCH CQRAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUN!L KUIVSAR SINHA, J. APPELLANTS/ PET1TSONERS WritADpeaiNo. 35/2007 1 Goverdhan Yadu, Son of Shri HemSal Yadu, aged about 25 years, Resident of Science CoElege Coiony Qtr. No. C-Q-10, Ralpur, District Ralpur (Chhattigarh) 2 Bhagwan Das Chendak, S/o Shri Kheti Das Chendak, Aged about 30 years, R/o Bazarpara, Bemetara, • District Durg (Chhatlisgarh) 3 Abhiiash Kumar Dhayai, S/o Shri Mohan La! Dhaya!, Aged about 25 years, R/o C/'o S Y Baxi, A1/14, Lok Nayak Society, Rohlnipuram Danganla, Rajpur (C.G.) 4 Nidhi Guptas, aged about 30 years, R/o RC Gupta M!G 8, Meghma!har Compiex, Heerapur, Rajpur (C.G.) 5 Sandeep Kumar Soni, S/o Shri Ghanshyam Soni, Resident of Qtr. No. Rlsali Sector, Bhilai District Durg (Chhattigarh) 6 Arunesh Atmapoojya, S/o Shri R.P. Atmapoojya, Aged about 31 years, R/o D-69, P&T Coiony, Gaigor Nagar, Ralpur (Chhattigarh) 7 Chitralekha Kabirpanthi, D/o Dwarika Prasad Kabirpanthi, Aged about 26 years, R/o 36/4, Kabirpanthi Kunj, Radhika Nagar, Bhliai, District Durg (Chhattigarh) 8 Miss Lata Smriti Baghel, D/o Shri MS Baghei, aged about 25 years, R/o C/o VS Baghe! near Baba Drycleaners, Daulat Estate, Dangania, Ralpur (Chhattigarh) 9 Mrs. Kiran Patel, W/'o Dr. R.P. Patel, aged about 24 years, R/o S. MIG-115, Sector-4, Pandit Deen Dayai Upadhyaya Nagar, Ralpur (C-hhatljsgarh) ^,^^^^,^^«»S^wws«^^5^^^ 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 Versus RESPONDENTS Miss Durgesh Nandini, D/o Shri C.L. Dewangan, aged about 29 years, R/o Block No.2/B, Street No.31, Sector 6, Bhliai Nagar, District Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Mrs. Archana Baghei, aged about 37 years, D/o Shri Sanjay Baghel, Resident of C/o Sanjay Baghel, House No.59, Near Rohinipuram Gate, Rohinipuram, Raipur (C-.G.) Deepak Mahapatra, S/o Shri Narendra Mahapatra, Aged about 27 years, R/o Bhairamdeo Ward, Jagdaipur, District (Chhattigarh) Mrs. Rekha Sharma, W/o Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, Aged about 28 years, R/o Near Sahoo Aata Chakki, Choubey Coiony, Raipur Dlstrict Raipur (Chhattigarh) Mr. Balram Ambade, S/o Shri B.R. Ambade, aged about 28 years, Resident of Vlllage Thakurbandha, P.0. Mudhapar, Tahsii A Chowki District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Nohar Kumar Dhiwar, S/o Shri Indai Ram, aged about 27 years, R/o P.0. Korasi, District Raipur (Chhattigarh) Shashikant Tamrakar. S/o Shri H.L. Tamrakar, aged about 29 years, R/o near Arohi Traders House, Sundar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Amrita Shukla, Daughter of Smt. Abha Shukia, aged about 26 years, Resident of Hani Former, Raipur (C.G.) Kaiiash Kumar Dhruv, S/o Shri Blsroo Ram Dhruv, Aged about 25 years, R/o MiG 11/195, Sector-1, D.D.U. Nagar, Raipur (Chfhattlsgarh) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, tVIantralaya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Secretary-cum-Asslstant Director, Department of TechnicaS Education, Directorate of Technlcal Education, Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Director, Department of Technlca! Education, Raipur (Chhattlsgarh) 4 Deputy Secretary, Chattisgarh Government, Technical Education, Janashakti Nlyojan Science and TechnoEQgy Deptt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5 Addi. Director, Department of Technica! Educatjon, Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) 6 Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla University, through its Vice Chancelior, Raipur 7 Unlv-ersity- Grant Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New De!hl, through its Chairman, New DeihE 8 Union of Sndia, through Its Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, New Delhl under Rule 157 (10) (a) of Hiah Court of ChhattjsQarhRules,,2005 Present : Shri IVIanlndra Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Shri Amrito Das, Counse! for the appeliants. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the State/respondents 1 to 5. None for respondent N0,6. Shrl S.S. Rajput, Counse! for respondent No.7. Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Counsei for respondent No.8. ith (04In March,2008) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by CJ. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 4 2) The appeilants have filed this writ appeai agalnst the Impugned order dated 05.12.2006 passed In W.P.(S) No.6608/2006. 3) Admittediy, the appeliants were appointed on contractual basls for a flxed term. After expiry of the term of the petitioners' contractuai appointment, they have no Eegaliy enfcrceabie right to continue on the said post In view of the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Secretarv. of and ©thers-v- Umadevi, reported in 2006(4) SCC 1. 4) We, therefore, do not find any infirmity En the impugned order which may warrant interference in this writ appeal. 5) The writ appeal, therefore, is iiabte to be dlsmlssed and is hereby dismissed summarily. padma Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge