1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 360 OF 2008 (Sunny Robert David .v. Manjulabai Jagannath Borikar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri R.H. Chandurkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri C.M. Funde, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 8TH FEBRUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 5th January, 2008 vide which the application for amendment of the appeal came to be rejected. The respondent has filed an application for grant of permission to issue quit notice on the ground of bona fide need. The said permission was granted. Being aggrieved thereby the present appellant has preferred an appeal. In the said appeal, an application for amendment came to be filed. The same is rejected. Hence, the present petition. Shri R.H. Chandurkar, the learned Counsel 2 appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the appeal, four students, whose names are given, were inducted as tenants by the landlord and as such his bona fide need is no more exist. To bring these subsequent events on record for showing that the respondent does not require the premises for bona fide need, an application for amendment ought to have been allowed. Shri C.N. Funde, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the learned trial Court has rightly rejected the application. Perusal of the application made on behalf of the petitioner would reveal that he is the tenant since 1995. The respondent was inducting students as monthly tenants. If that is so, the petitioner could have made an averment regarding induction of students as tenants much prior to filing of the present application. In that view of the matter, I do not find any perversity in the jurisdiction exercised by the learned trial Court so as to warrant interference of this Court. Hence, the writ petition is rejected. JUDGE *rrg.