1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3316 OF 2010. Suresh P. Jagtap .vs. The C.E.O., Z.P., Yavatmal Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Y.P. Kaslikar, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : JULY 26, 2010. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.5.2010 placing him under suspension for the following reasons :- “1. Not performing the legal duty. a) Not calling the Monthly Meetings/Meeting of Gram Sabha, b) Not collecting the Taxes, c) Not collecting the Re-Taxes, d) Not writing the Account Book, e) Not maintaining the office of the Gram Panchayat upto date, f) Not complying the Audit objection, 2 2. Not providing the Office of the Gram Panchayat to observation.” We see no reason to interfere with the order of suspension since it is passed in the circumstances referred to above under Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad, District Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964, which power of suspension is within the discretion of the employer. The petition is hence rejected. Judge Judge J.