Xl-HC-78 gggj'm:“k _ mmmaanéw :EIVislON SENCH: — acN'sggg MR. Lg gHADCOAgb _ agm’m wga. I‘m. pswmum. 3;; lé—i1«2605 . Mr. Abhay Kiimar' T§wari; catlnséi 1ior- ‘rhe appeiian‘i‘.’ . ‘ J ’Mr. Ravinam Agmwa‘, Pénei Lngvyer' fér ‘l’ha 5+.u‘tai'raspondant Qmi judgment 3y 7his appea! under 5ec1'i n 374 {2) of me Cr.?.C. “me accuses-7 appellan‘f has quesi'ioéied 145a Sega hr, Vaf ‘H‘Ie judgmen? cf canvic+ion and senfénce dumd 23rd Januaryf ’19 , pa$sed by 'rhe Addiffemi $essions Judgg ‘Sakti, camp a? Jan‘jg'ir, i 5Eésions Tr§al No.7éf1§§4, whereby iearned\AddiTienal Sessions Judg gf‘i‘er holding fhe accused/’appeibn? guii’fy far fhe ccmmissbn af offe ca under Secfign 302 of fhe I.P.C. farv cammifi‘ing fHe‘ murder 0f JG rm Eat. :en‘fenced him 1'0 undergo §mprisonmenf for iiice.‘ ”fha case 0f 14k proseguti n, in brief, is *fha? an ii-i§-1993 a? - 1.30 gm. Phesi Saj appeared bef re .Doiica Shi'ien: Sak'ri aw informed mmf‘mdgy he wasVreTummg To ‘ is vmage frcm Sak‘ri 3T abcu? 12 man, when he was bamgen Saraipnii Godhi, San+mm Sahu ma? him an fhe ‘way anti informgd him m? 1'13 go e viiiage and said fha'!’ Amrifiai Vadav ims cammit‘rad fhe murder of y ur' wife and mother wi'rh The sword". Smwam Sam $Lw$er saiel Ti'm a is going 'i’c viiiage: “yau g0 and reperf _.’_ ‘ O\ 1 @ XI-HC—78 Cs>ét3€8fré maim'm mm‘ mam mama) ' ‘ ammerm anésmrWai mmwma 2‘ " - WW#%®W aiwma ' fhé i'ha'rfar #0 ‘rhe Poiice”; fha‘r is wHy'The is reporfing fhe ma??er. Phoci §ai furfher smfed fhaf fhe accug‘ed used To cail his wife wiTch¢mff and tin accaunf Q15 Thai on many ocmsions, he quarraiad wHh hart On raceivéng? this infimafibn, ‘rhe S‘fa‘tian' Hausa Gfficer, Pdice Sinfion: Sa‘m régis‘.ered 1‘he FER. €xF—2‘; and’ieff far me scene of oc¢urrenca Af+ar givmg nofice +a‘Pm¢ha$z ha grepw'ed ‘f'ne Panchcmang o‘x #he baciy in.“ Jumuna Bai EXP-5, tharemcfgr‘, sgn? fhe body pf Jamuna 3:13 f0 ?rimary Ham?! €en?re, Sak’ri, mm . ‘ posf-maémm where tin PR. i‘Jewangan s9n&uc?ed pcsfmmorfem en “rhe $cd‘y sf Jamuna Bai and prepared fhe repwf Ex.P—18. Dr: FR. Dewangan' (P‘v 4.?) noTiceé w many a§ :sgvzn incigid wounds on various gar‘i's of ‘irhz hgdy sf deceased Jamuna Em on? of which inciszd wound No.1 was aver iaf? side df The aeck and paraiiei“ » abiEqua in direé+ien irrc'm jus‘r side sf'cenwai Hnepf frcn‘; c‘F fhe neck up To back par? of me neck fiH cemicai ver’febrai coiumn region in 1m size of 11 cms. x 3.5 ems in cenfi'rz x 3..§ ems. in can‘rra. Caridcoi vérfabm‘ coiumn was fauna cuf pawl-idly, Fascia, muscies, iorgz & smoii blooo vesseis were aiso found CUT, cio?‘red b5ood>was present En ‘rhe opimon of ‘the doc‘cor; fhe ¢a£e of deaf?! was shock and haemorrhaga. Whik in ooticz cosi-ody, 111a occu§eolopp ‘ilont gova memorandum (EXP-3) unoier, .‘Secfion 27 of ‘fhe Endien EViden Ac? regarding Tha weagcm of offznce nomeiy sword: whizh Was seiz d, Vida saizure meme EX.P~5. The « l 1 W ‘ X—HC-78 I @936é2 1a.... maW (aafgaa) mmm‘m ~g~ Inves?iga+ing Officer aiso faok biooci smined sail from The scar fuck in‘m 35ossession fha ciofk prepnrgzi The sife pian EXP-10 $1: "Af‘rer compiefion of inv mmwmar . mamm'ersermjf ewma ‘ V imo poééession The piain soii and ?he e m‘ eccur‘rence under Ex.?-6. He aiec es of "rhe accused under EXP—7 and fhe scene of occurrence. ‘iga1'écn‘ Charge sheet was fiied in The Caur‘l’ iif Judichl Magis‘fmfe, S kfi! who in furn, commiffed 1%e case +0 fha Sessians Judge, Biiaspur, f om where, ienmad Aa’a‘ifiénai Ses$égn$ Judge, received me case for tr The prasacu‘ricn in crd r +9} preve The offance againsf 1'he 1"he afhar ham, sfufemem' of i'lrw acgusad was r corded ui1dzr Sewiw‘. 313 e'F tha Cr.P.C. in'which ‘i'he accused denied fhe grosecufion evidenca‘ pieadzci inngcenca He aiso riicl (DW-i} in his defence. Learned Addi‘riomi Sessiorié Judge afi' ii heqring fine argumgn‘t‘s of Addifionai‘ Public Prosacu'i‘ar and couhsel f r *Hwa accused, convicfzd and $am‘anced the accused in fhe manner judgmenf. Wé hava heard immed counse! for fhe appeilm+ am! iearned $3anai Lawyer for The. Sfafe/ espondenf, perused The evidence and judgment 9f fhe irrial €our1‘. wimesses. accusgd/‘appeiian? examined ' 1 1 Whi7 ‘1 . i On iy-impiicaTed in The crime. e nfiened in the earfier per? e1: This e ‘1 i and said Thai“ he has been fa ! axamineai one wifnass nameiy e m mm$ W 6v R368 % 31WW (W) mazmm wmet’m ‘ mmmam ‘ 4L ‘ Wmermm $Wané$1 ‘ Learneei counsei Fer 1+: accuaew ap‘seiiun‘f hem m? dispufad #he fac'r of The dam! of Jamun Bai as hom‘cldnl m nafure. Apart from ' +hg‘f 'from fhe evidence of D . PR‘ Dewangan (PW-ii}, as per i‘he posh- man‘rem repor‘r and +he avid ca sf Bhum‘rhi (PW-5) eyewrmex The game of deaf?! of Jamuna 3m was *he resuH o The assau maée by the mcused/appellgn? wH‘h fha 9rd Trwrefore fhe dem'h of Jamuna 3 was hemic§dai ‘m nafura, . As far as The involvemem of The accused/appeiian? in wmmiffing +§1e murder of Jamuna Bai is coryiczrned, Bham+ial {PW-S) has sfafed in hi wuence fhaf rm xuuefui day %‘e wen? no The achuei where his Teacmr han&a& aver him g pie¢e ¢T paper for delivzrmq +ha same 'i’o fhe VIHaQe > Ko‘rwar, when ne was coming mm The smog! Ta handover Tne sad piece of paper Ta Tim Kofwar, and when ha reached near fhe‘ vmage Tank ne saw fha? accused Am§a?§a1 was a'r‘l'acking his mc+her wi'rh a swsra. PW-8 hands us a rasui-l' of whith shls f3“ dawn and fhe accusgd, ran away frgm ‘rhe ‘scene of accurrence. A? Thaf fime, his 'yaunger brai’her Vagesh Kumar aisd came Thare and informed hm TM? “1e accugea‘ ‘¥-as ais'o muraared fhéir grandmafHer ?W 8 saw Tha'f his mo‘41ar was breaj’hmg ‘ne immediately wen? To The «chooi and Mom-ed {ms macher Ram Dayal Thé above evidence of This wi‘mess (?W-78) has been correborafeefuy 'fhe evidence of Ram Dayai {FW—Q), who has stated that he handed over SP/FS/2005 - 20000 , \ i l has fur‘l‘her sm‘red ‘Iha‘!’ The clccueed‘ aTTacked his mother on her head &' m WW;m, mg? 6%: 36??).??.6.. mm mamm amméerm mamma ~ '5 ! for delivering +hé same To 'rhe vmage éx piece o-F naner I V +6 Ehara+it Koiwar, howéver, wifhin 5-? r 'he was wagging and sfa'l'ed ma‘kenf Rum Dayai (PW-Q) a wé‘iom a5so Bhamtld narra‘rad f assaulting Ms mother by Amréfhl and wifhin five minufes Vagesh Amri‘rlai murdered Their gran cf fhe house. The evidence o carmbamfw by ?§1e median? e Dr. PR. Dgwgngrm (P , ~‘1Q-3993 a? about 7 am. he JGmuna Bai, which was brou noficed seven incised wounds neck in ‘i‘he size of 11 ems. mm#wm $Waimt SP/FS/2005-20,000 , ‘ ninu‘i‘es Bham'fld rémrned *0 The schaoi tha‘f accused Amrm’ial has murdered his iiad one Sanfmm, reiai‘ivg of Eharufiai,.to he has wé‘messed fhe fac'f r: 1'he same awry and gharm’k'ai sTaa‘ed fha‘r ,umar aisa came ami said fhaf gccusad me‘rher aiso and boéy is iying 9H fne éoer ‘ Bham'l'hi (PW-8)., 'rhe eyewi’h'iess, smnds 'idence aEso. 1i) ‘nw $‘m‘3'ed in hé$ gyidancz +ha+oh 12- mndum‘zd posT-morfem gn ‘riae bniiy of ht by Poiice Censmbk Anand Singh. He on fhe bedv cu‘r 9f which cne was on *Hne 3.5 c‘ms; x 1.5 cms. The cervicai verTicai aniui'nn was cu? up “re huif afr he size, sm‘i Tissuzs, muscies, iarga & smaii- infesfine, and' biaoa‘ vesseis were found cut The gecond incisgti wound was on The ief'f hand and Th side of fire cha5‘f in f‘ne size of 12 x 4 x 2 incisaa waund was an 14m ief cms. and fwo ribs beneath {me incised weund on Wine ief There were Two ofher incise humoraus bone was-found cut The 1'nir-d above injury wera found cut Theré was giuTeai region in‘hhe size af 7 x 3 x i cms. waunds on ‘rhe ie'H ieg in {he size oi: 12 x mam (1am) e m §m$ @ c9 a3££../% "m ‘ W L j mwzimm mmmsnéa ,é. 3 x 1 crhs. bofh are a? ¥he 5% on i‘he knee of The ief'f ieg. Thareforz, fhe. avidentx a? Eham‘flal (PW-3) sfands wrrobomfed‘ As par fim evidgnce £21: fhe Invesfigui'ing Gffice‘r, The weapon of effeng accused, Defence m3 mf axaminafinn of Bhnmfigi {PW {PW-11) er ‘me invesTigafim thase wifnesses dcub?fu§ w Cuur‘r ha: mah‘hy amapued ”the qbova gwdgnce iegai and ciincking zv§c§ente int/giving Ting r In View of fhe abavg accusedfappeiiam in The ccmmissio’n of affance, we are af the finding recereed by .fhe friai 50w? ‘z‘he accusedz’appeiian? in ccm'mi'rring 'rhe f reguirrz any inferfarence by this Cg‘uri e accusedx'appeilan? argued f‘mi’ this was we no imamion of 'me accused To cummi'’. such, fhe affence does na‘r +mvel beyond anawm (W) ‘ $Wané§1 SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 , 'ne £ize. There was anoi¥1er incised wound :e, sword was recevered a? ihsmnce of ‘me baen able to eiicif my fact En cwss- -3), rhe eyemfnesa Gr Dr, RR, Dewangan ; Office" whwh makes +he zv'denca o1" Mreiiabie. In The cirwmsfances; fhe "rriai he abave avia‘ence ahd pfaced' reiiance an V ‘b‘Q fi‘he ubové med'icni widened. consEered opinian fha? f regarding The invoivemehf murder 9f Jamunu Bai does n Learned counsei for 1". ’§he firs? offeme and mere ‘x’he murder af Janiuna Eai, e Secfum 3G4 Part of 'fhe I P C 8LT we do nm‘ fmd wbsfanceiin ihis argumem‘ because in order 'fo ascermm 14m mien? on of fhe accused ronduc‘r of fhe accmed h o y Hm §m$ WWWW . §é§§ 96 Wee mamw (W) ammmanéar ‘ 7._ weapon of éf‘Fenca usedxy him, mariner' in w‘hiéh me mjumes are ihféici'ed and par-rs m‘ 1‘he bady where ”me im‘ui‘ies were infiic?e& are fine infenfien mt the accusad. If wa hmk ' reia'gm‘ féc’i'ors f0 ascertain in'h) fhé evi&ence, fhe acc iappeiianf affucked Jamuha Eai wifin‘ a swam”, which i$ a dead§Y w 11, and if a “ersan V %s mmcked or; mck b‘-i ?he sword fhen +her'e is hm" 5y any chance of survimi m‘ Ufha-r Vivi-5m Moreover, The accusea‘ Cha neck for infiicfing The injary and whiie attackéng The deceasedlyicTi The accused was so brumi and mzrciiess fhaf he infiicfed as Many as s van incised wounds. No? on!y fhis, before a-“ta mm danum gui ‘h sed a? fhe msidence 0f Jamuna 8m had alreadv ccmm'l'fgd Hm mur z; cf Rocpkunwqr $m mmher-m law w? ’ Jnmuna 3m. Thersf , ;n View of He abwa facts i7 is esmb$ished Tim? The accused assa l'*e& ‘hmuna Sm wr‘h a sword only wai’h m'i'entcn fa ccr'mri' her murder. As such; The f ihg af ‘rhe friai 'Ccur'i' fha‘? fhe accusedt’ Bai wh‘h mien-rim ,‘m commH: har‘ murdgr does mi- require any inferfergnce by fhis Court in the circumsmnces, we are cf The cansidergd cpimon 'rhm‘ There is he merif in *his apped, snafe is lieiblg fa be dismissed and if is hereby ,a’ismissed. As far a. The Qpphcmwn fiiad en behaif ef The accusedfap‘aeiianf In Sessions Tria§ Nos.75f1994 & 78/1994 SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 appaiiunf assauh‘ad Jufhunn fhc'!‘ +he sen-rences awarded v ‘ u d s n‘ v u i d @ WI-a; bagsQfM «1209. msIW (W) anéstanm mnméamias mm#m ‘am%qanég1 mmm met N m s’noJiQ ibe made ccncurranf, in of 5ec1’iarz‘427 0f #h‘g €r.?.€ ’concLérreniw‘ Parfizs are enfi‘i’ied for c eri’ifigd copy m’: lfhis ord‘zr. Sd/ LC; BHADoo Vléw of fhe p‘rowsmns of‘su’b-ggcWn (E ) . fhe se’n‘rences are direci'ed i'o be run i : ; ?;.Dilip Raosaheb Deshmuklw * ; ‘ Judge z R V v l ”AE A A / « _ ’ r SP/FS/zoo5 - 20;poo W —