1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1090/2010 Om Prakash. vs. The Director, Central State Farm, Jaitsar & Ors. Date : 8.2.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.RS Choudhary, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's referred dispute was decided by the Labour Court vide award dated 17.4.2009 wherein it is held that though the petitioner worked for 240 days in a calendar year but at the same time, it has been held that as per Standing Order 12, he was working on a non-sanctioned post and in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court delivered in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi reported in AIR 2006 Hon'ble Apex Court 1806, he is not entitled to reinstatement and thereafter, the Labour Court held that the petitioner shall be entitled to one month's salary plus 15 days' other benefit with interest at a rate of 7.5% from 21.10.2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the petitioner was given appointment 2 against a non-sanctioned post but since the project is working, therefore, the award passed by the Labour Court, Sri Ganganagar is contrary to law. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the finding of fact that the project has been closed and appointment has been given against the non- sanctioned post, therefore, the petitioner could not have been granted the relief more than what has been granted by the learned Labour Court. In view of the above, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya