Ct^'/^o^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRITPETmON^fo.^^5/2006 PETITIONER ..-•'3P ^-?.-<-0-" ^'^-•'B-e ^\.-"".^-y ^^ ^w' ^0'' ^o^y ^cy ^>-"" RESPONDENTS Dr. S.C.Sinha, S/o. Shri/ S.D.Shrivastava, aged about 65 years, Rt. Additional ^- ^"f Director, Higher Education Departnient, Govt. of C.G. Raipur (C.G.). Presently residing at 1/1 Green City, Krishna Hoines, E-8, Guhnohar Colony, Bhopal (M.P.) VERSUS n .^i. 1. State of Chhattisgarh,- fhrough Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^ -o^ 2- The Accountant General,' ^y ^•u" Chhattisgarh Pagariya House, Raipur. 3. Accountant General, Madhya Pradesh, Jhansi Road, Gwalior (M.P.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-78 sn^r^irf^rH; OTTSTI^TTsti^i* HMWI awrcb ssr^fraTera', »Tnu'is,f«ii-iiu^< ri^.lOP.a).^^P.. ^ 20fl|g 3ll^l tsith (yi(^c|i^<T) ??tITW flf?(T sn^T 30.08.2006 Shri Sumit Verma, Couns^l for the petitioner. Shri Satish Supta, t5y. ^.A. for the State/Respondent No.l on advwice copy. Shri S.K. Bsriwal, Counse The main grievonce of -^he petitioner raised in this petition is that the respondents are not p^xssing orders regarding final payment of the fieneral Provident Fund amo^int to the petitioner due to him. Lecrned counsel for •Stie has been made to the effect t!'|at in the month of September,1998 the petitioner had taken a loon of has not taken any such locn. f-\ issuing a certificats to the ef certificate to that effect, cop^| tiil/nothing has been hear-d from «bi«fd<fl.iTTti?rr iffs^ <Riwi< ^; srf^iT sn^T for Rsspondents No.2 & 3. petitioner submitted that wrong entry Rs.2,00,000/-, whereas, -the petitioner e further submitt-ed 1+iat the petitioner an qspiication to ti^e Treasury Officer, Satna (M.P.) for fect -that -tiie petitioner has not taken the loan of Rs.2,00,000/- on^ 1+ie Treasury Officer has issued a of which is Annexure P-8. Thereafter, the petitioner has made re^resentction (Annexure P-10) to the Accountant Gensrcd of Madhyi|i Pradesh and also to the Accountant ©enero!of Chhattis9arh reques^ing them to correct -Hie said error, but <./>(t,»l t' the side of respondents. In the circumstances, lec|rned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be ollovjfed to make a detailed representation to P.T.O. XI-HC-78 +<l*<dl Sh+(|ch 3^=:aFPTRPT, aTt'ly'Ko, Kliliyy ^-^.LOC$<)..i/.^8... ?R; 2006 (,) 3llit<l tia<»i (li?tt^'s«<.iiT) 3n^T^rf<-ii+ cmr W^T aiTRi gRnwHfgtfan^T 2- +i<itd4l-) iiTiRfr'ir' fecA (RRZTC ^STf^trgn^T '. A reSDondent No-2-Accountcuit turn, he be directed To decid4 which learned counsel for the rej Having hecrd learned regard to the facts and circunj: aliowed to make a detaited rep^i with copy of •rtiis petition withii^ grievaices and in turn, respon^i decide the reoresentation of within a period pf two months! representation; With the direction aforesd Conssquently, I.A. No.817f circunistances S^neral, State of Chhattisgarh and in tiie representation of petitioner, to ^pondents has no objection. c4unsel for the petitioner and having of -rtie case, the petitioner is rep^resentation to respondent No.2 along a period of four weeks raising cl! his esponejsnt No.2 is directed to consider and fhe petitioner in accordance with law |from the date of ths receipt of the id, •ttie petition stands disposed of. >/06 stands disposed of._^__-—--—" .c.^ado° ^ luAg-e ta P.T.O.