1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2521/2008. Yogesh Bhaskarao Pawar ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: D.D.SINHA and C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATE : 23rd June, 2008. 1. Heard Mr.Shriniwas Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no.3 – Committee. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is selected as Legal Assistant and his name is also shown in the select list dated 13/3/2007 published by respondent no.2 from the reserved category, the appointment letter is not issued for want of validity Certificate. 3. Mr.Deshpande, learned counsel for the Caste Scrutiny Committee, has submitted that the 2 caste claim of the petitioner will be decided within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. Mr.R.K.Deshpande, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3 has submitted that the select list will be valid for a period of one year from the date of publication of the same. It is further submitted that if the caste claim of the petitioner is validated by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, necessary order of appointment shall be issued to the petitioner. If the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee is adverse to the petitioner, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the same. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE. chute