1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2442/2009 (Hatime Ali Vs. Rent Tribunal & Ors.) Date of order : 25.03.2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Manoj Joshi, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that application filed by him under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) CPC read with Section 21 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 was rejected vide order dated 6.8.2008. The Tribunal while rejecting the said application fixed the case for framing issues. Thereafter, a review petition was filed by the petitioner against the order dated 6.8.2008 and it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that while deciding the said review petition, the Tribunal has committed an error by fixing the case for evidence. In my opinion, the petitioner is raising voice with regard to the procedural lapses which are said to be committed by Tribunal. In my opinion, at the time of adjudicating the matter, all the sub0ordinate Court are required to follow the 2 procedure laid down under Code of Civil Procedure and under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 for deciding the matter of disputes of landlord and tenant. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with the expectation from the Tribunal that the matter will be decided after following the due procedure laid down under Section 21 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun