A*!^^^..--^*- %' ji^ HIGH COURT OF CHWATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2344 of 2006 Petitioner : Ravindra Kumar Thwari Aged - 45 years, Son of Shri M.L. Thrari Podsd as - L.D.T., At- S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H. No. 30®8,Brahman Para, Raipur, District - Rafpur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of ChtatUsgarh, Throigh- The Secretary, School Education Depariment, Mantrala^i, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Diredor, Publfe Insfrucfions, Chhattisgarh, Head Quaiterat - Raipur 3. The Goveming Body of Kaiibadi Shiksa Samati. Through - Its School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadi, Ratpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITtON U/A -226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon'ble Jusfce Shri Sah'sh K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharvrani, counselforttie prtitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyerforttierespondents/State ORDER (Passed on this 16th day of April, 2(W7) The question of law invohred herein is whrther the non-teaching staff working in Government aided school are entitled to flie benefrt of recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission under e provisfons of Uie Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Ar^a Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adbiniyam, 1978 (hencsforth fte Adhtniyam, 1978') and the rules made thereunder read with tte Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rutes, 1988 (henceforth "the Pay Rules, 1988'). Leamed counsel appearing for the peUtioner submlts that the terms and conditions of the teaching and nwi-teaching staff are govemed by flie same provisions of law whteh were under consideraBon by this Court in hakur the matter of Smt A. Lall vs. Slate of ChhatUagarh and other eonnected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), wherein by the juctement and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that ttie peUUoners who are woridng in fully Govemment aided privato schools are enUUed to e revlsed pay-scales with eflect from 1.1 .1986 as prescribed uncter the Pay Rutes, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of payroent of awears had granted certain direction. ^lmittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the parties that this matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in the case of Smt A. Lall w. ^tte of Chhatfegarh and otter connected matters (Supra). As a result, for ttie reasons stated in ttie judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhatttsgarh and ottier connected matter^ (Supra), the wrft peBfion is allowed in the same terms and condffions. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge s%>-