IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2901 of 2009. Decided on: December 20, 2010. Ram Lal and others …..Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.Ankush Dass, Sood, Addl.A.G., and Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Ms.Monika Singh, counsel for respondent No.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “i) That the permanent absorption of the petitioners with the respondents No.1 and 2 made vide office order dated 3.6.2009 at Annexure P-5, whereby the services of the petitioners have been permanently absorbed in the Department of Fisheries under respondents No.1 and 2 may very kindly be quashed and the petitioners may kindly be repatriated to their parent department under respondent No.3 and 4 with all consequential benefits. OR in the alternate respondents No.1 and 2 may very kindly be directed to take into account the services rendered in Milk Federation by the petitioners under respondents No.1 and 2 towards seniority; continuing with the benefits of the scheme of EPF and GPF instead of Contributory Pension Scheme under respondents No.1 and 2 and also with entitlement of pensionary benefits as in Milk Federation.” 2. It is not in dispute that the petitioners herein are also similarly placed as the petitioners covered by the judgment in CWP No.2634 of 2009, titled Mohar Singh and others versus State of H.P. and others, dated 19.8.2010. 3. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows. In case the judgment referred to above has become final and in case it has been implemented, there will a direction to the respondents/competent authority to extend similar treatment to the petitioners herein also, as extended to the petitioners covered by 2 the judgment referred to above, in case they are similarly situated, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and a copy of the writ petition, alongwith a copy of the judgment referred to above. We make it clear that the impugned order herein shall not stand in the way of the competent authority in taking the action, as above. 4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 20, 2010. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/bss) Judge.