IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 873 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Versus SHEELABEN P JOSHI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DD VYAS for Petitioner MS DT SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI Date of decision: 22/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. None present for the petitioner. Heard Ms. D.T. Shah learned advocate for the respondent. 2. It is stated by Ms.D.T. Shah learned counsel for the respondent that pursuant to the order dated 15.10.1988 passed in reference to (LCR) No.1491/83 and during the pendency of this Special Civil Application the respondent workman was reinstated with all back wages. That thereafter the respondent workman raised the industrial dispute claiming regularization of her services. The Industrial Tribunal passed order in favour of the respondent workman regularizing her services. The order of Industrial Tribunal was challenged by Special Civil Application No.7949/97 and the said Special Civil Application came to be dismissed by the learned Single Judge of this Court. The matter was further carried by the petitioner to the Division Bench in Letters Patent Appeal No.115/99 and the Letters Patent Appeal came to be dismissed confirming regularization of the services of the respondent workman. It is further stated that in view of the above facts the present Special Civil Application has become infructuous. The Special Civil Application is dismissed having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. 22.6.2001. (N. G. Nandi, J.) /phalguni/