CRR No.2191 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRR No.2191 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.01.2011 Chinder Pal Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Jai Pal ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. N.L. Sammi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Atri, Advocate for the respondent. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Perusal of the record reveals that by the impugned order dated 4.8.2009, the Revisional Court/Sessions Judge, Sonepat has directed the Magistrate to rehear the parties and to pass a fresh order, in accordance with the provisions of law, either to frame charges or to discharge the accused. In view of the observations made by the learned Sessions Judge in a revision against framing of the charges, the Magistrate shall opine, either to discharge the accused or to frame charges against the accused, hence I am not inclined to invoke my revisional jurisdiction. CRR No.2191 of 2009 2 Present revision is dismissed. However, the Magistrate shall expedite the hearing of the case and shall proceed in accordance with law, in the light of the observations made by the learned Sessions Judge. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 12.01.2011 sk.