IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26156 of 2010 HIRA KANT JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 03.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add Section 414 in the set of allegation mentioned at paragraphs 1 and 4 of the bail application. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Araria(Tarabari) P.S. Case No. 54 of 2010 for offences punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)A- 26/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel with reference to the allegation set out in the F.I.R. submits that in absence of any recovery of a firearm from the conscious possession of the petitioner, no case is made out under the provisions of the Arms Act. In so far as the allegation set out under Section 414 is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the deposition placed at Annexure-2A of the application, submits that the informant of 2 Araria P.S. Case No. 47 of 2010, the investigation whereof has given rise to the case in question, has very clearly stated that the petitioner was not amongst the accused persons who had snatched the motorcycle. Learned counsel thus submits that in view of the clear deposition of the informant of Araria P.S. Case No. 47 of 2010, the petitioner has been wrongfully roped in the present case. Considering the circumstances and the submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner namely, Hira Kant Jha, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria (Tarabari) P.S. Case No. 54 of 2010. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)