HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S No. 4471 of2008 PETITIONER : Lokeshwar Prasad Maitri S/o Late Bodhram Maitri, Aged about 30 years, R/o Community Health Centre, Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS mi h e D C. W‘RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF W INDIA VERSUS : l. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Health and Faly Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Th ChiefMedical Officer, Jashpur (C.G.) The District Tuber Colosis Control Committee, Iashpur, istrict Jashpur (G.) U). ’ ’ esent: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for e State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed onW 14’ day of August, 2008) \\ With the conent ofthe parties, the matter is taen up for hearing finally. 2. Learned counse appearing for the petitioner, on intructions, submits that the etitioner does not want to press the relief to the extent of quashing of advertisement (Annexure P/l), but the petitioner may be granted outstanding salary payable to him, due from December, 2005 till date, as he has worked on the post of ’ Senior T.B. Lab Superviso at Community Health Centre, Bagicha. 3. Shri Shrivastava submits that the petitioner was appointed on contract basis vide order dated 12.01.2004 (Annexure P/Z) on the post of Senior T.B. Lab Supervisor at Community Health Centre, Bagicha, District Jashpur for a period of one year. His services SB: Honble Shri Satish K. AgnihotrL J. Pr th s k l s p r were extended time to time and was allowed to continue upto 11.01.2008. Shri Shrivastava further submits that the petitioner has not been paid his salary for the above stated period without any rhyme and reason, to which the petitioner is legally entitled to as he has performed the work assigned to him. Accordingly, in the event, it is found that the petitioner has not been paid salary for the period he has worked, the respondent authorities are directed to examine the facts and make payment of his salary for the period he has performed the work. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the authorities by filing a representation for payment of his salary for the period he has worked. The respondent authorities are directed to consider his representation in accordance with law, on its own merit, and pass appropriate order, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. With the above directions, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Consequently, I.A. No. I, application for grant of ad~interim Sdl- l r t l elief, stands disposed of. [e Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge \m n r