IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1877 of 2009 Sunaina Devi, wife of Lal Bahadur Manjhi, resident of village- Baraipatti, P.S.-Yadopur, District- Gopalganj. …………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Mithilesh Rai, son of late Bankey Rai. 3. Babloo Rai. 4. Binu Rai. 5. Munte Rai. (all sons of Mithilesh Rai, resident of village-Barai Patti, Yadopur, Gopalganj) ……….Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 12.12.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 5.09.2009 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in G.R. No.1490/2005, Trial No.568/2009 by which the learned court has not found the essential ingredients to proceed with the case under Section 3 of the S.C. & S.T. Act and other sections are triable by the learned Magistrate, therefore, the accused have been directed to appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge has not found any ground to attract Section 3 of the S.C 2 & S.T. Act, as such, the offence under that section is not maintainable and the other sections are triable by the learned Magistrate. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)