IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.823 of 2008 ARCHANA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 03/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner challenges the appointment of respondent No.6 on the post of Angan Bari Sevika. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. The counter affidavit is sketchy, non- committal and hardly helpful in deciding the controversy. The petitioner has the remedy before the District Programme Officer to assail the appointment of respondent No.6 where all issues of facts also can be appropriately adjudicated from records. If the petitioner files a petition before the District Programme Officer within 30 days from today disclosing material particulars of the grounds of illegality alleged in the appointment of respondent No.6 only in that event is the District Programme Officer required to decide the matter after hearing all concerned, including respondent No.6 within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/presentation of the same along with a copy of this order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)