1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No.3151 of 2008 in Criminal W.P.No.320 of 2008 (Manojrao Panjabrao Kale .vs. State and another ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders ======================================= Mr. S.A. Jaiswal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Y.B. Mandpe, APP for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : K.J. ROHEE &, A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. By order dated 27.6.2008 Criminal Writ Petition No. 320 of 2008 filed by the petitioner was allowed by this Court directing the Competent Authority to reconsider the prayer of the petitioner by taking into consideration the medical certificate dated 13.3.2008 regarding the ill-health of the petitioner's wife Sau. Pushpa. It seems that in accordance with the said direction, the competent authority granted parole to the petitioner for a period of 30 days. It is to expire tomorrow i.e. on 10.9.2008. On 1.9.2008 the petitioner moved application for extension of parole on the ground that he has to arrange for 2 finance from friends and relatives for medical treatment of his wife. The medical certificate dated 14.8.2008 issued by Medical Officer, General Hospital, Amravati filed along with the application shows that the wife of the petitioner requires operative procedure with blood transfusion. It may be recalled that the order of the Competent Authority rejecting parole was set aside by this Court only on the basis of the medical certificate showing that the petitioner's wife requires regular check up and histopathological investigation. However, the affidavit dated 29.8.2008 filed by the petitioner shows that no histopathological investigation is advised. This clearly shows that the petitioner has not come up before this Court with clean hands and is trying to get extension of parole on false ground. Hence we are not inclined to entertain the application. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE halwai