IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2007 / 13TH MAGHA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 1599 of 2006(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.2194/2006 .................... PETITIONER: -------------- D. PRISEKUTTY, S/O. DANIEL, AGED 50 YEARS, TELECOM MECHANIC,COMPULSORY RETIRED BSNL EDAPPURAYIL HOUSE, KARAKKAD P.O., CHENGANNUR, KERALA. BY ADV. SRI.SAJITH KUMAR V. RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. S.A. THOMAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BSNL, TRIVANDRUM. 2. ALICE THOMAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, TELECOM (DET),BSNL,CHENGANNUR BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. THANKAPPAN, J. -------------------------------------- C.O.C.No. 1599 OF 2006-S --------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2007. J U D G M E N T By the judgment dated 5th July, 2006, this Court directed the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all service benefits. It is reported that the petitioner has been reinstated in service and with regard to the service benefits, the Department is taking the stand that the suspension shall be treated as leave and for that effect a show cause notice is also issued to the petitioner to file his objection for the above proposal. In the above circumstances, if the petitioner is aggrieved by allowing the service benefits, it is left to him to file objection in that regard. With the above observation, this Contempt of Court Case stands closed. K. THANKAPPAN, JUDGE. cl 2