!\lB)l‘\ MiSCELLANEmJS .awEAL M). ffjm‘r 1’. Sure$h Kumar, Sfc AnfritlaL '. Kamlesh Kumar Sto Himlai Paiel 3. Seaway kumar, Sm Himlal Patel LL Madho Knxmr mo Hxralai ?aiel i Lhameh Bm DA) Eralal ‘ Huhsman Wxdmiv oi Hxral‘ai E’aiai A11 the aimve appellant§ ale Rm Vilhae ‘ AWEIELANTS RESmNDENm , Bhetiilxena, Tahqi Dabhara, D1str1ct Janjgar- Chmpd (C G } Krishnaial S10 M o‘tila] Pate} Rashamlal @, Badripmsad ’o Motilai Pam Both by Caste — Agharia, R50 Village Bhedikana, Tahsil Dabham, Dimict Janjgir-Champa {CG} \ ‘ RgsgDEN ‘ ayPELLANTs 1 w 1 £ ! ‘ \ I \ . A 3 State 0f Chhattisgarh ‘D kw . cane/”x4” @3471 ‘ 3%?Y‘ Chm MISGELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION V CGU131T10N ACT , RESPONDENT REsypwmT w. . wTs .9 : 5—3 —2GG4 5h ré Kishore Bhadur}, coun ‘ Shri Rajeev 5h rivasfavq, c Shri HS. Pamk counsei f0 5hr§ ghaskar Pyasi f ?anel z Hearé . mr-fies su'bmi‘: Thaw‘ The compromge has Learned caunsei for The Tween The parties m Terms of fha 3/2003) fifed bafore This Cour? arid in :r be pagsed far seHlemem ammg fhza alrew‘y heen ‘jaken phce b§‘ campromisa deed (1A. Na.366§ Terms‘ of "rha‘f compromise ordé parfies. Accordingiy, fhe mafier is dea§ da‘rad 30-3*2003 cmd 3W accordance wi‘?h campromise dee‘ or appowrionmzn‘r 6f fhair Shams m Sdl- L.C.BHADOO Judge dispasec? of m 13mm 0f ‘iLha campz’omiga cancemed Ravznue Gfficer f a par‘kks are a? liber'ry To cppmach se! fw The ap§e§$am N03. ounsal for ‘Hae appeHan'm 2 ‘ro 6. r respondenE 1 and 2. .awyer for ‘rhe 5m‘re/re5pondam’ Naif). ii. 513% é‘i‘hi‘x