IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR C.A. 9275/08 IN WRIT PETITION NO.243/08 [ Omprakash Agrawal ..vs.. State ] ===================================== CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE:20,1.2009 . Heard counsel for the parties. No sufficient reasons for further time to file reply. Application is disposed of in terms of the order in the main writ petition. 000 W.P.243/08: Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner contends that the application of the petitioner for revalidation of his licence be considered. Learned A.G.P. states that the matter has already been admitted and it can be decided on merits. Considering the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the respondent has not filed any reply, it would be proper to direct respondent to consider and decide the application of the petitioner dated 1.3.2002 in accordance with the prevailing government policy and resolutions and the law. This respondent shall do it within a period of 3 months from the receipt of this order. It is made clear that the court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. Writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE smp