HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No.9of2010 APPLICANTS : 1. i»NO NON-APPLICANTS: k 2. 3. Versus State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Joint Director, Town & Country Ptanning, Directorate of Town and Country Planning Ra'ipur (Chhattisgarh) Respondentsl to 5 1. 2. 3. 6. Sukhdev Singh Sando, S/o Late Krjpal Singh Sando, aged66years Mohinder Singh Sando, S/o Late Kripal Singh Sando, aged 78 years Baljeet Singh Sando, S/o Late Hardeep Singh Sando, aged 42 years Smt. Kuldeep Kaur Sando, Wd/o Late Gurusharan Singh Sando, aged 62 years Seerath Slngh Sando, S/o Late Hardeep Singh Sando, aged 44 years (all residents of Civil Lines, G.E. Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Petitioners 1 to 5 Municipal Corporation, Raipur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Commjssioner, Municipat Corporation. Ralpur, (Chhattisgarh) Present:- Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State/applteants. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for non-applicants No.1 to 5. Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for respondent No.6 and 7. Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. ORALORDER (22-1-2010) 1. By this petition, the applicants have prayed for additional time to comply with the order dated 8 December, 2009 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5657 of 2009 whereby the State was directed to take a decision on recommendation of the Municipal Corporation in the matters of execution of lease deed of non-applicants No.1 to 5 expedjtiously latest by 8th January, 2010. 2. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State submitted that m compljance of the aforesaid order certain queries have been made from Municipal Corporation, Raipur and the Munteipal Corporation has failed to respond to the queries till date. 3. Shri HB. Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate appeaing on behalf of ie Municipal Corporation and Shri U.N.S. Deo, leamed Govt. Advocate appearing for the State pray for additional time of 4 weeks to comply with the order dated 8-12-2009. • 4. Shri Ashlsh Shrivastava, leamed counsel appearing on behalf of non- applfoants No.1 to 5 submitted that he has no objectton if time, as prayed for, is allowed to the respondents to decide the matter. 5. In view of the above, 4 weeks' time is granteGl to the State as well as Municipal Corporation, Raipur to comply with the order dated 8-12- 2009. 6. MCC Is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Barve