/l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2724 of 2002 Petitioner Dr. Bharaflal Tiwari, aged about 67 yeai's, S/o Ramlal Tiwaii, retired A^irvedic Chikitsa Adhikari, resident ofvillage Sarkaada, P.0. Pao-duka, District- Raipiir (Chhattisgarh), Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, tlirough the Secretaiy, Departinent of Panchayat & Rural Developraent, D. K. S. Bhawan, Maati-alaya, Raipiir (Chliattisgai'h), 2. State ofMadhya Pradesh, fhrough Uie Secretary, Departinent of Paachayat & Rural Developiaent, Vallabh Bhawaa, Bhopal (M.P.). 3, Jaupad Paachayat, Chhnra, through tfie Chief Executive Officr, village- Chhnra, District- Raipur (Chliattisgarh). 4, Zila Panchayat, Raipur through the Chief Executive OfScer, Distdct- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Biag^e Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. A^iihot?!. Shri B. D. Guru, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pauel lawyer for the Respondent No. 1. Noiie for Respondents No. 2, 3 and 4. ORAL ORDER ( 6th January, 2006) The foUo^dng oi-der offhe Court was passed by Satish Ko Ags&ihotri, J. 1, The petitioner was appointed 011 fhe post of Vaidya' by fhe Jaiipad Sabha, BUaspur on 12.11»1960. Thereafter the petitioner was trarisferred to Gariyabaad and fhereafter posted in block - Chhura, Distdct - Raipur. Fiirther, the petitioner was appointed as Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikari on 18.1. 1973 . 2. On 20.4.1988 fhe Govt. decided to take over offices of Vaidyas/ Azirvedic Chikitsa Adhikari aiid to absorb fhem. ia the Departinent of PubMc Health and Fainily Plaanuig, They were re-designated as 'Assistant Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikad\ The petitioner whUe workuig as Assistaat Ayarvedic Chfkitsa Adhikari retired from service 011 superannua.tionw,e.f 31,8,1993. Leanied couusel for the petitioner subniits fliat oue Di\ Mahendra Kzimej- Venaa, who was also retired from fhe post of Assistaiit Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikari ffled Writ Petition No. 2810 of 1996 in the High Coiirt of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur iii which he had prayed for graiit ofbenefit ofvarions pay comniittees aad pay conimissions, Vide order dated 1,10,1997, passed in fhat writ petition, it was directed that the petitioner be given benefit of tlie pay committees aiid Pay Commissions (szipra) within a period of sbc nionths from fhe date of the order ajid difference ia the pay woiild be psid to the petitioner in accordance witii the revised pay scales fixed by flie variozis pay coniisiissions/coniinifrtees, Leamed counsel for the petitioner farther subisiits fhat snice the petitioner staads on the same footing, he is also eutifled for the saiiie benefit as has been directed m W.P.No. 2810 of 1996 by fhe High CourtofM,P, Jabalpiir. Haviiig heard leamed counsel for the parties aad haviag rcgard to the facts aiid circunistaiice of the case, the petitioner is aUowed Ubei^ to niake a detalled representation to fhe aiifhorities concemed, raisiag atl his grievances, In ttini, the authorities concesned shall consider aiid decide the reprcsentation, tf any, wifhin a period of two nionfhs froni fhe date of receipt of the reprcsentation, ia accordaxice wifh law, keepiag iii view the diTection given m W,P.No, 2810 of 1996 vide order dated 1.10.1997. In view of fhe foregoing, fhis petition staads disposed of fuiaUy. No order as to costs. Certified copy/as per Rnles. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge