IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13884 of 2010 MD.RAUPH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.05.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a police case registered under Sections 25(1-B) A, and Section 26 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that from petitioner’s house one civil barrel gun was recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from this case the petitioner was also an accused in Bensund P.S. Case No. 23 of 2000 and Parsauni P.S. Case No. 32 of 2000 but in both the cases he has been acquitted and a statement to that effect has been made in para 7 of the present application. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 17.12.2009. In view of the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Md. Rauph, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sheoghar at Sitamarhi with two sureties of the 2 like amount each in connection with Piparahi P.S. Case No. 23 of 2009. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that petitioner will appear regularly during trial. If the petitioner defaults for three consecutive dates in participating in the trial then the Trial Court will be at liberty to consider for his cancellation of bail bonds. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)