IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8451of 2011 Decided on: 26th September, 2011. Kuldip Singh. …Petitioner. Versus Union of India & others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Saklani, vice counsel for the respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “a) That a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant the benefit of financial upgradation under the Assu8red Career Progression Scheme with effect from the year of 2001 instead of the year of 2006 And to promote the petitioner with effect from the year of 2006 instead of with effect from 18.12.2009 as has been done by the respondent department, in the light of documents annexed herewith as annexures. b) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may also kindly be issued for setting aside the letter dated 05.09.2009/08.09.2009 vide which the claim of the petitioner has wrongly been rejected.” 2 2. It is seen that annexure P-3 representation filed by the petitioner is pending consideration before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to look into the matter and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law without discriminating the petitioner. The needful, as above, shall be done within three months from the date of production of copy of this judgment alongwith copy of writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th September, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (hl/kck) Judge.