IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14914 of 2010 1. VIJAY KUMAR 2. RAMAKANT PRASAD SINGH @ RAMAKANT SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05. 08.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Four persons named including these petitioners are alleged for firing shots injuring deceased to his death. Defence is that independent witnesses are not naming these petitioners and they (petitioners) have been falsely implicated in the case due to previous enmity as his brother was killed and F.I.R. was lodged against him by these petitioners that can be taken as real motive also. It appears that there is division in village; villagers are divided into two group. Informant and two witnesses including post mortem report is there to corroborate the prosecution case as number of injuries is four, assailants are four. Undoubtedly, number of witnesses are there shown independent by the I.O. and about petitioners being not assailant, may never be believed at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioners for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)