Crl.M.No.M-8247 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-8247 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 18, 2010 Zaildar .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.P.L.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.P.M.Anand, Addl. A.G, Haryana. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.223, dated 26.6.2009, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 506 IPC, and later on 307 IPC is also added, at Police Station Hathin, District Palwal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 22.3.2010, passed the following order: “Crl.M.No.14805 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M 8247 of 2010 Argues that petitioner is alleged to have caused injury with axe on the left side of the head of Aslam and the other accused, namely, Islam and Rati Khan alleged to have gave lathi blows on the head of Aslam and that as per MLR only one injury was found on the head of Aslam caused by blunt weapon. It has further been argued that co-accused Mohd.Hussain, Rati Khan and Khurshid have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated Crl.M.No.M-8247 of 2010 (O&M) -2- 21.12.2009. Notice of motion for 26.4.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said order, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 22.3.2010, granting interim bail to petitioner-Zaildar, is, hereby confirmed subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 18.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge