* 1 * BA-1559-2011 15. Nov. 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1559 OF 2011 Baleshwar Ramu Chauhan ....Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra Borivali (W), Mumbai .....Respondent * * * * * Mr. S.H. Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for State. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 15 November, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The applicant herein is accused in C.R.No. 63 of 2011 dated 21st March, 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 306 read with 34 Indian Penal Code. He is the husband of deceased, Gyanti who committed suicide on 13th March, 2011. One-Gudia Chauhan and Meena Chauhan are the other two accused who have been released on bail. Gudia Chauhan is the sister of Meena Chauhan. The applicant is alleged to have illicit relations with Gudia. Meena is the wife of brother of the applicant. According to the applicant, he has been falsely implicated in the case by the family of Gyanti as they are not on good terms with the applicant. 2. On 31st March, 2011, Gyanti was found missing from the house. Later * 2 * BA-1559-2011 15. Nov. 2011 during night, her body was found on the railway tracks. On the date of the incident, the applicant was at U.P., having gone there to attend a marriage. The fact of Gyanti gone missing and finding of her body subsequently was informed to the applicant immediately on the very day. He, however, did not return to Mumbai. He went absconding. More than two months after the incident i.e. on 16th June, 2011 he was found and arrested in U.P. The Sessions Court rejected the application for bail by the applicant in view of the apprehension expressed by the police that he would again abscond and not be available for trial. It is strange that after learning the news of his wife gone missing, despite two small children being alone at home, the applicant did not return to Mumbai. He was also not immediately available to the police. Considering the conduct of the applicant, in my opinion, the Sessions Court was right in believing the apprehension expressed by the police and rejecting the application. The present application is rejected for the same reason. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]