IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46449 of 2008 GOVIND YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 3.12.2008 Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. As may appear from the earlier rejection order, the prayer of the petitioner was dismissed in the light of the fact that he had dealt farsa blow to the deceased on her head. That was a solitary assault on the deceased. The contention is that rejection was for a limited period and at that stage of the proceeding and, as such, the trial was directed to be expedited. The question of fact could not be gone into at the present limited stage of the proceeding and I could go into the earlier order which otherwise appears substantial. The petitioner appears the assailant of the deceased on facts and, in that view, I do not see any reason to reconsider the prayer. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )