IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 81691-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 29.01.2007 Jagdeep Singh Gill .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. M.S. Khaira, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Abinashi Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. Petitioner Jagdeep Singh Gill, apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No. 35 dated 1.4.2005 registered at Police Station Lambra, District Jalandhar, under Sections 384, 342, 506, 34 IPC, has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of the FIR as well as the order dated 8.10.2005, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, whereby bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed. While issuing notice of motion on December 23, 2006, interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to his joining investigation. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the vehicle in question was seized in pursuance of a condition contained in the agreement executed between the parties, the factum of which was not disputed before the Court below. Crl. Misc. No. 81691-M of 2006 -2- Counsel for the petitioner further states that in terms of the interim order dated December 23, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. The State counsel, after having instructions from Kewal Singh ASI does not dispute this fact and further states that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits, the interim bail, granted vide order dated December 23, 2006, is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. January 29, 2007 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE