( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2904 OF 2010 Dr. Kantilal s/o Mangilal Tatiya PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the respondents. ..... [CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ.] [DATE : 7th April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ostensibly filed as a Public Interest Litigation, praying therein for quashing and setting aside the decision of the respondents to construct and shift Central Administrative Building from the existing Shahada Tahsil Office to the proposed site ( 2 ) i.e. Gut No. 516, 517 Mohide (T.S.). The petitioner also prays for issuance of a writ directing the respondents to construct Central Administrative Building in Survey No. 13 or on the land which is reserved for Government offices. 2. This is a peculiar case where the petitioner seeks the aforesaid reliefs. By an administrative decision, the Government has decided to shift the Tahsil Office from its existing place to a new site. The grounds for challenging the aforesaid decision are that there is land reserved for Government offices in the Development Plan and secondly, if the Tahsil Office is to be shifted, lot of inconvenience would be caused to the residents of the said area. 3. According to us,in such administrative matters, no interference is called for at the behest of the petitioner. It is the administrative decision of the Government to shift the Tahsil Office from its existing place to a new place. As to where the office should be located, it is a decision which the Government has to ( 3 ) take. In that light of the matter, the petition is dismissed summarily with no order as to costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V. HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE NPJ/wp2904-10