IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6859 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 25, 2010 Ranbir Singh …Petitioner Versus Haryana Wakf Board and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that suit between the lessee and lesser is not maintainable before the Wakf Tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner further C.R. No.6859 of 2010 states that the petitioner – plaintiff may be permitted to withdraw the suit itself with liberty to file it before the competent Civil Court. Learned counsel further states that since impugned order has been passed by the Wakf Tribunal, the same is without jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the respondent – Wakf Board states that the impugned order be set aside and plaintiff- petitioner be permitted to file fresh suit before the competent Civil Court. In view of this, present petition is disposed of with the direction that impugned order shall stand set aside and petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh suit before the competent Civil Court. In the event of filing such suit before the Civil Court, Civil Court shall not be influenced by any finding recorded in the impugned order and that suit shall be decided in accordance with law at its own merit. November 25, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2