THE HON’’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1320 OF 2010 O R D E R : The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 28.01.2010 in O.S.No.20 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Parvatipuram, wherein the evidence of PW.1 is eschewed by the trial Court. Heard both sides. The respondent filed a suit against the petitioners/defendants for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,48,000/-. It is stated that previously one G.Krishnamurthy Naidu, husband of the plaintiff filed a chief-affidavit and the matter was coming up for his cross-examination. Subsequently, the plaintiff herself filed a chief-affidavit and, therefore, her husband sought eschewing of his evidence on the ground that it is unnecessary. The trial Court, therefore eschewed the evidence of PW.1 ie., the husband of the plaintiff. When the plaintiff sought to examine herself and give evidence in the matter and when the evidence of the husband of the plaintiff was stated to be unnecessary, the Court was justified in eschewing the evidence of the husband of the plaintiff ie., PW.1. The defendant cannot have any grievance about the same and he can certainly take advantage of the availability of any adverse interference that can be drawn about the non-examination of any material witness by the plaintiff. The impugned order eschewing the evidence of PW.1 does not, therefore, call for any interference by this Court. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed without costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 30TH July, 2010 Pnv