:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.881 OF 2005 Nitin Kamalakar Chakranarayan ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.P.R. Arjunwadkar, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 28th February 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. As there is direct evidence to indicate complicity of the Applicant, as he was apprehended by the Police on the spot with blood stained sattur in his possession, and seriousness of the offence, not a case for bail. I see no reason to depart from the conclusion reached by the Court below in rejecting the bail application :2: preferred by the present Applicant. The Court below has rightly taken into consideration antecedents of the Applicant while rejecting the bail application of the Applicant herein. Hence, dismissed. . As prayer for bail is rejected, the Sessions Judge, Solapur, is directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, if not already done, to ensure early disposal of the trial as High Court Expedited Case. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)