WA 298/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H BARUAH On 22.8.2007, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly, t he writ appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. Subsequently, an application for restoration was filed, but the Division Bench f ound no merit in the application. Accordingly, the application was dismissed on 17.9.2007. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant carried the matter to the Supreme Court in Civi l Appeal Nos.2051-2052/2009. By an order dated 27.3.2009, the Supreme Court expr essed the view that the matter should be disposed of on merits and the order dis missing the writ appeal deserved to be set aside. Pursuant to the order passed by the Supreme Court, the matter was again taken up for consideration on 27.5.2009. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant on 2 7.5.2009. On 19.8.2009 learned counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and the matter was admitted. Today, when the matter is called out, there is no appearance on behalf of the ap pellant. There are three learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. W e are told that one of the learned counsels, that is, Mr. B. Malakar has since e xpired. However, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant by the other two learned counsels, namely, Ms. B Choudhury and Mr.R Das. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry is directed not to entertain any application for restoration unless it is accompanied by a receipt of ‘ 1000/- towards payment of costs with the Assam State Legal Services Authority.