IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 10239 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 27th October, 2010. Bata Shoe Store Petitioner through Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Anil K.Sharma, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. A.S.Thind, Advocate, for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks a Mandamus to direct the respondents to provide adequate security/protection to its employees as also adequate aid and assistance to enable it to run its business peacefully. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, the respondents have put in appearance. In view of the categoric averments made in the short reply filed on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 that the petitioner is running its business peacefully and without any obstruction being caused by any one, as well as the undertaking given by respondent No. 3 that no obstruction shall be cause and the action to evict the petitioner, if any, shall be taken in accordance with law, no further directions are required to be issued in this writ petition, which is disposed of as having become infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police authorities and/or this Court, if so required, in future. Disposed of. Dasti. October 27, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE