IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 465 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.07.2011 Raminder Kaur ..Appellant Versus State of Punjab and another ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR, JUDGE. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH, JUDGE. Present : Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the appellant. 1. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 10.03.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the appellant was neither selected nor recommended by the Selection Committee to the Appointing Authority. It was also clarified that no candidate lower in merit than the appellant was selected nor any candidates with higher merit have been ignored. The respondents also claimed that there was no violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The selection in the present case pertains to the year 1992 and the Vidhan Sabha Committee was constituted to go into the whole gamut of the selection and submitted its report (Annexure R-1). Once the respondents have taken a categorical stand, we find that the learned LPA No. 465 of 2011 (O&M) [2] Single Judge did not commit any error of law or fact to conclude that no person lower in merit has been selected and appointed to the post of the Science Mistress. There is no assertion raised by the appellant in order to show any such fact. The appeal is wholly without merit. Dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE 27.07.2011 'ravinder'