Civil Revision No. 5621 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 5621 of 2010 Date of Decision: 6.9.2010 Gurdas Ram …Petitioner Versus Charan Singh Rai …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) This Court, while dismissing the connected Civil Revision No. 5620 of 2010, preferred by the petitioner, relied upon cases titled as Vinod Kumar Mittal and Another v. Jagandeep Singh Rana (Civil Revision No. 5210 of 2010, decided on 26.8.2010) and Narinder Kumar Mittal and Another v. Jagandeep Singh Rana (Civil Revision No. 5211 of 2010, decided on 26.8.2010), and held that the delay, in filing an application for leave to defend, cannot be condoned by the Rent Controller. After the leave to defend was declined, in consonance with the procedure prescribed, the Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, has examined the landlord and came to the conclusion that the ingredients of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 have been Civil Revision No. 5621 of 2010 2 fulfilled in the present case and ordered eviction of the petitioner/tenant. Therefore, the order, passed in connected Civil Revision No. 5620 of 2010, preferred by the petitioner, be read as part of this order. Hence, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed as the order passed by the Rent Controller, Hoshiarpur, suffers from no infirmity. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 6, 2010 “DK”