1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.276 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8305 OF 2010 Prakash s/o Mahadeo Gavad, R/o-Khed, Tq. & Dist-Osmanabad. ...APPELLANT. VERSUS 1) Haridas s/o Krishna Lomte, R/o-Khed, Dist-Osmanabad, 2) Kantabai w/o Rangnath Raibhan, R/o-Khed, Dist-Osmanabad. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.S. Choudhari Advocate for Appellant. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 7TH OCTOBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2 2. Shri. Choudhari, learned counsel submitted that learned Single Judge committed error and illegality in rejecting the Petition as devoid of substance. The learned counsel referred to the relevant orders passed by the Court's below and the pleadings. 3. We have perused the order passed by the trial Court in the proceedings of R.C.S. No.85 of 1983 dated 4th August, 2010 and the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 13th September, 2010 in the proceedings of Writ Petition No.8305 of 2010. 3. We do not find any perversity or illegality in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge has also mentioned that the Suit was presented in the year 1983 and is still pending for disposal since last 27 years, apart from the consideration of the issue on merits. We do not find that the grounds 3 raised in the Letters Patent Appeal are convincing enough to interfere in the impugned order. The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/OCT10/lpa276.10