IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 331 of 2008 Sarafat and others … Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others … Respondents Mr. K. S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. K. S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. Shri B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the final report against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned on 10/06/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit final report before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. CLMA No. 2588 of 2008 is disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 17.12.2008 Shiv