1 11.cas1052.07 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1052 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 18142 OF 2007 Ratnabai Namdev Mahangade & anr. ....Applicants. Vs. Smt. Pavitra @ Savitra Bajirao Mahangade & ors. ....Respondents Mr. R.V. Bansode, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. Pradeep Bhosale, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Bansode, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. Bhosale, who appears for Respondent No.1(original Plaintiff). The other Respondents are either served or were deleted inn the Trial Court itself. This can be seen from the title of the Judgment of the Trial Court and District Court. Perused the Application. Application is opposed on the ground that no explanation is given and in any case the Decree has been executed. Merely because the Decree is executed, that may not be a 2 11.cas1052.07 ground for refusing to condone the delay. Since explanation for delay is sufficient, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and it is disposed off. 2. Second Appeal to be placed for admission after 3 weeks, after removing all office objections, Civil Application No. 1250 of 2011 and 1251 of 2011 to be listed alongwith Second Appeal. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)