IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14143 of 2011 1. Arti Kumari, D/O Umesh Prasad Singh, resident of Village – Gamariya, P S – Muraliya, District – Madhepura. 2. Noorani Anjum, D/O Md. Naiyar Alam, resident of Village – Doria, Sonapur, P S – Simraha, District – Araria. 3. Vimal Kumar Vivek, S/O Shyam Lal Paswan, resident of Village – Sikti, P S – Sikti, District – Araria. 4. Prabhash Ranjan, S/O Ramesh Chandra Mishra, resident of Village – Fakharpur, P S. Arwal, District – Gumla. 5. Salma Aasia, D/O Amanullah Amin, Resident of Mohalla – Sohdih, P S – Sohsarai, District – Nalanda. Versus 1. B.N.Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Vice Chancellor. 2. The Vice Chancellor, B N Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 3. The Registrar, B N Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 4. The Controller of Examination, B N Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 5. The Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh, Purnea through its Director. 6. The Director, Millia Institute of Technology, Rambgah, Purnea. with CWJC No.14440 of 2011 Md.Shahnawaj Quaiser, S/O Md. Quaiser Imam, resident of Choudhary Mohalla, P S – Katihar, District - Katihar Versus 1. B .N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Vice Chancellor. 2. The Vice Chancellor, B N Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 3. The Registrar, B N Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 4. The Controller of Examination, B N Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 5. The Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh, Purnea through its Director. 6. The Director, Millia Institute of Technology, Rambgah, Purnea. ----------- 02. 16.9.2011 Petitioners are supposed to be the students of Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh. They got admission in the engineering stream, completed their first year, sat in the examination but the results were not declared. They are allowed 2 to be promoted to the second year, completed the course of studies and towards the fag end result of the first year announced where petitioners have failed in a couple of papers. This is the background in which they are not being permitted to sit in the second year examination despite pursuing the studies. Taking into consideration series of orders which have come to be passed by this Court in similar circumstance, which are contained in Annexure-4 and 5 series, both the writ applications are allowed with a direction upon the respondents i.e. university authorities as well as the Director, Millia Institute of Technology, Rambagh that petitioners will be allowed to sit in the examination even for the second year with liberty to appear in the papers of first year in which they have failed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)