IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C.(T) No. 172 of 2008. Decided on: 8th October, 2010. Dr. Mohan Lal Pandey. …Petitioner. -Versus- Shri Vineet Choudhary and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 8th October, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?