1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1144 OF 2009 Heart & Soul Entertainment Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Deepak Bahry ...Respondent. Mr. Indu Prakash i/by Mr. C.K. Tripathi for the Petitioner. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 7th October, 2009. P.C.- 1 The Petitioner has invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act). Admittedly, both the parties have challenged the award under Section 34 of the Act. The same is pending for final hearing. 2 The claim of the Petitioner is based upon the amount which he has spend on film production. His Counter claim of Rs.3 crores is also dismissed by the Arbitrator. The same challenge is also pending. 3 The Respondent, therefore, challenged the same on various grounds. The amount is crystallized, at this stage, by the Arbitrator but yet, 2 considering the scope and the nature of dispute so raised, I am not inclined to grant any interim protection as sought in the present Petition. However, any transfer or transaction will be the subject to the decision of the Arbitration Award. 4 The Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)