[-1-] FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPL.NO.93 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPL.NO.93 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPL.NO.93 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRI.APPEAL NO.449 OF 2006 CRI.APPEAL NO.449 OF 2006 CRI.APPEAL NO.449 OF 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Pramod Kachare for Mr.K.S.Patil and Deepak Girme Advocate for Applicant Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for State CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 307 of IPC. By order dated 2.5.2006, the applicant was granted bail on condition that he shall stay out of Pune District pending the hearing and final disposal of the appeal and he shall report on every first and third Monday of the month to local police station where he resides. The [-2-] applicant is now seeking relaxation of these two conditions. 3. As far as the first condition is concerned, the learned A.P.P. has pointed out that after the applicant was released on bail by this Court on 27.1.2007, C.R.No. 3029 of 2007 came to be registered against the applicant on the complaint of Mahendra Laxman Gavhane. The said case is under Sections 323, 504, 506 of IPC. On 17.2.2007 one N.C. case bearing N.C.No. 322 of 2007 under Section 506 of IPC came to be registered against the applicant by one Altaf Shaikh. This clearly shows that the applicant has misused the liberty granted to him by this Court. In this view of the matter, no case is made out for modification of the order dated 2.5.2006. 4. Application is rejected. [-3-] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]