IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH MAY 2010 / 14TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14218 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. A.U.THILAKAN, ARANAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.NANDIPULAM, THRISSUR. 2. M.L.JOHNY,MANGALAM HOUSE, P.O.NANDIPULAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 3. STEPHEN, S/O.ANTONY, PIDIYATH HOUSE, THALORE,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 14218 OF 2010 (B) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners submit that the 3rd respondent has applied for variation of his timings and that coming to know of the same they filed Exts.P1 and P2 objections. It is stated that in spite of the 2nd respondent having received the objections, the application for variation made by the 3rd respondent alone is scheduled to be considered. In the circumstances, writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the objections filed by them also as and when the variation sought for by the 3rd respondent is taken up for consideration. 2. If the facts are as stated above, there is no reason why the 2nd respondent shall not consider the objections filed by the petitioners. 3. Therefore I direct the 2nd respondent to take up and consider Exts.P1 and P2 objections,with notice to the petitioners and 3rd respondent, if these objections have been received and are pending, as and when the variation applied for by the 3rd respondent is taken up for consideration. WPC.No. 14218/10 :2 : 4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed anything on the merits of the contentions raised by either of the parties and it is entirely for the 2nd respondent to consider the matter in accordance with law. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/