IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9977 of 2004 Between: Sri Venkateswara Bala Bharathi Vidyamandir Aided Upper Primary School, Rameswaram, Proddatur, Cuddapah District, Rep by Correspondent, R.B. Jayadeva Varama ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep by Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Director of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh Saifabad, Hyderabad 3 The District Educational Officer, Cuddapah District, Cuddapah 4 The Deputy Educational Officer, Proddatur, Cuddapah District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or Writ Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not considering the recommendation of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 for admitting the unaided posts of two B.Ed. Assistants; Two SG. Assistants; one Gr.II Telugu Ppandit and one Gr.II Hindi Pandit existing in the petitioner school to the grant-in-aid as bad, arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 admit the unaided posts of Two BEd Assistants; Two SG. Assistants; One Gr. II Telugu Pandit and One Gr.II Hindi Pandit Existing in the petitioner school to the grant-in-aid. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : O R D E R : When this writ petition came up for hearing on 23.06.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it was directed to be listed on 26.06.2009 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:26th June, 2009. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}