IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4656 of 2010 NAHVEER SINGH, SON OF LATE PALAKDHARI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PIPRA JAMUVA, P.S. CHOUTHAM, DISTRICT-KHAGARIA……PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………..OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Raghvendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 2. 22.2.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 498(A) and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case, however, he was ready to keep his wife extending full dignity. Further submission is that it is well reflected in the order passed by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, while refusing the bail prayer of the petitioner, that due to rigid attitude of the mother of the complainant the attempt for reconciliation had failed on account of that the petitioner had allegedly remarried another lady. It is submitted that no such case has - 2 - been instituted by any person against the petitioner. However, the petitioner is stated to be in custody since 28.10.2009. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Nahveer Singh, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Katihar C.A. Case No.1821/2007. However, it is made clear that the petitioner must cooperate during the course of the trial and shall remain present all along. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)