IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.787 of 2009 Anil Kumar Jaiswal, Son of Late Laxmi Prasad, resident of Village- Pakaridayal, P.S. Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran, Motihari……………………………………………………..…..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari. 3. Addl. Collector, Land Reforms, Sikerhana, Motihari. 4. S.D.O., Pakridayal, East Champaran, Motihari. 5. Anchaladhikari, Pakaridayal Block, East Champaran, Motihari. 6. Shashi Bhushan Kumar Verma, Son of Late Paras Nath Verma, resident of Village-Dhanauji, P.S. Pakaridayal, District-East Champaran, Motihari. 7. Hemant Kumar Kushwaha @ Biharijee, Son of Jilan Mahto, resident of Village-Dhanauji, P.S. Pakaridayal, District-East Champaran……………………………………………….Respondents. 2. 26.08.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by notice issued by the Circle Officer, Pakaridayal dated 24.11.2008 as contained in Annexure-2, whereby one Hemant Kumar Kushwaha @ Biharijee was directed to produce proof of his possession since some private persons have made an application for measurement of land of area. The petitioner is aggrieved by the stipulation in the notice whereby boundary raiyats were directed to be present on the date of measurement. The notice as contained in Annexure- 2 only stipulates general directions to 2 boundary raiyats to be present on the date of measurement i.e., 30.11.2008 hence, apprehension of petitioner appears to be misconceived. However, it is submitted that petitioner’s representation is pending before the Circle Officer, Pakaridayal, Motihari. Let the Circle Officer, Pakaridayal, Motihari, dispose off the same expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)