^ 'y'^i.t^g "a ^^:^^.F-. SEWisiiF ppR'f'y ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITIONNO./7© '/2006. «' PETITIONER ^..A ^^i) ^•^SS^ <^^>-:"" A-- / AjitSingh S/o Late Shri. Gumditt Aged around 63 years, Ex. BSP employee. Residina at: Qr. 18/A Street-3, Sector-2 BHILAI-490001 Tehsil and Dist.: Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^IG_ _ _^)to>Sua^ r-fr<Y ^AKUR^l^NGH ' Asst' SolicitorGenera^d^^ MWUISGARHH^O^^ Hfgh'eourtGanipus, Biiaspur ^.u.i /3, Union oflndia, Through: The Secretary, Ministry of Steel and Mines, Govemment oflndia, 192-UdyogBhawan, NEW DEUH- The Managiag Director (SAIL), Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). The Sr. Manager(P) Recruitment Section BfflLAI - 490001 District: Dure fCG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCEOF APPROPR1ATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAIVIUS ETC. ^wi-"yi'yi0'u,w^l'H«i<a,I^oi'd^t ]WI^ iM»ia»*ii<p W(.200 3ii^<ixa<p ('yilgq'a) an^TWTR'lI'ii wii3n^?r*i ./ .• '"^- ^ Gowri ?^?ii8R •HlSd sn^n 8^-2006 Shri B.P. Rao, Counsel for the Miss Sharmila Singhai, Stan *l<lid41*f 1Wdl"<ffo'<!l ttui't^lt ^aiKl'oii^CT petttioner. ling counsel for the Union of India/ espondentNo.1. Shri P. Uwakar, Sr. Adv<(cate with Shri Anoop Mazumdar, ^dvocate are ateQ present inCourt.l »esupplied to them for respondents II Application for urgent hearing Copy of the petiUon with annexures to.2and3. te allcwed. l-1eard. Learned counsel for the petit|»nersubmits that for the present the ^etitioner may be directsd to make s| (nerits of the case, in the opinion ^erved sf a direction is given to jepresentation raising his grievanc^ fespondents along with a copy bfth thall decide the same on its own me tossible. It is made ctear that if any ifiay avail the remedy available under|the law. With the aforesaid obsen/ation Certffied copy as per rutes. representation before the concerned toffipetent authprities and if such re(?resentation is made, the same shatl |)e considered and decided. Nptopposed. Having consklered and witht>ut expressing any opinion on ttie »f this Court, ends of lustice will be the petitioner to make a detailed ^ before the competent authority of ^ petition and this order and on such ^presentertion being flled, the contietent auttority of the respondents ^ts in accordance with law as earty as grievance still remains.the petitioner ^, this petitlon stands dispose^ot Sdf- Fakhruddin ' Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 '^ '^"