SBCWP No.10025/2008 Narayan Singh Vs. Karanveer Singh & Anr. 1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10025/2008 Narayan Singh Vs. Karanveer Singh & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : - 29.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sanjeet Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Mehta, for the respondent no.1-caveator. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent no.1-caveator. The petitioner's injunction application was dismissed by the trial court vide order dated 9.1.2009 and appeal has been dismissed by the appellate court vide order dated 20.10.2008, hence, this writ petition has been preferred. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner-plaintiff has allotment letter for the land in question in his favour which is dated 23rd April, 1991. His possession is proved from the Photographs placed on record by the petitioner. In view of the above, the trial court as well as the appellate court committed grave error of law by not granting the relief of injunction to the plaintiff. SBCWP No.10025/2008 Narayan Singh Vs. Karanveer Singh & Anr. 2 I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the reasons given by the courts below. The alleged allotment letter for the land is absolutely vague, contains no specific measurement of length and width nor it contains neighbourhood nor any map is annexed to it and land of Khasra no.627 is 41.2400 hectare and has been shown as Banjad in the revenue record. The Photographs were also considered by the courts below and it has been found by the courts below that from those Photographs the possession of the plaintiff and any overt act of the plaintiff over the plot in dispute is not proved. The two courts below considered the facts in detail and rejected the petitioner's application for grant of injunction, which appears to be for valid reasons. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-