(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2009 (In Writ Petition No. 2823 of 2008) Prashant Prakash Pawar, Age : 33 years, Occupation : Educated Unemployed, .. Applicant R/o. Hanuman Galli, Mandana, (Original Taluka : Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar. petitioner) versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. Chairman/Member, District Selection Committee/ District Collector, Nandurbar, District Nandurbar. 3. District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, District Nandurbar. 4. Shri Kishor s/o. Vasantrao Dhumal, Age : Major, Occu. Service, R/o. C/o. Primary Health Center, Kusumwada, Tal. Shahada, District : Nandurbar. 5. Shri Ravikiran s/o. Hukumchand Pawar, Age : Major, Occupation : Service, R/o. C/o. Primary Health Center, Borad, Tal. Taloda, Dist. Nandurbar. (2) 6. Bharat s/o. Maharu Kolhe, Age : Major, Occu. Service, R/o. House No. 395, Koli Peth, Near Godown of Tukaram Shripa Chaudhari, Jalgaon. .. Respondents .................. Mr. B.V. Thombre, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. P.M. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate, for respondent no.3. Mr. M.S. Sonawane, Advocate, for respondent nos.4 to 6. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE 2009. COURT’S ORDER : 1. The petitioner seeks review of the order dated 5th February 2009, passed in Writ Petition 2823/2008. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant (original petitioner) submits that there are still vacant posts in the Zilla Parishad and, therefore, the respondents be issued a direction to appoint the petitioner. (3) 3. This court has clearly held that as and when there are vacancies in the posts reserved for the physically handicapped, the respondent Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar, will intimate the petitioner and two other similarly situated persons, about the examination, both written and oral. In order to safeguard interest of the petitioner, this court has directed separate letters to be issued to them by registered post well in advance, so that these persons can avail of the benefits available to the physically handicapped persons. 4. In case, the posts are available, the petitioner is very well at liberty to approach the Zilla Parishad and implementation of the direction issued by this court. We are afraid, that we would not be in a position to issue such direction in the review petition. Review jurisdiction would only permit this court to correct an error which is apparent on the face of record. 5. No error, apparent on the face of record, is noticed so as to invoke review jurisdiction. 6. The Review Application is, therefore, dismissed. ( S.P. DAVARE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ...................... bgp/ra91