IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1458 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16577/2009 Dated 16/06/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.P.VINCENT, S/O.C.V.PAULOSE, AGED 54 YEARS, SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, PERORMANCE AUDIT UNIT-4, OFFICE OF THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.PURUSHOTHAMA KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- RAJESHKUMAR SINGH, AGED 42 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ANNEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.RAMESH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- Cont. Case (C) No. 1458 OF 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that the Departmental Promotion Committee had considered the case of the petitioner and passed orders on 16.6.2009 itself, the date on which Annexure A1 judgment was delivered by this Court. He submits that the decision taken by the Departmental Promotion Committee was also communicated to the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute the said submission. In the light of the fact that the direction in Annexure A1 judgment has been complied with, I find no grounds to proceed further in this Contempt Case. It is accordingly closed, reserving liberty with the petitioner to challenge the decision of the Departmental Promotion Committee in other appropriate proceedings, if he is aggrieved thereby. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE vps 2