IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11718 of 2008 AKHOURI GUPTESHWAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 13.08.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner has been at Bhojpur Collectorate at Arrah since 2006 when the present order of transfer has been passed on 2.8.2008. To that extent the Court is not persuaded to interfere. Learned Counsel next relies upon a government instruction bearing no. 344 dated 1.3.2007 to submit that as per Clause ‘Ka’ in case transfer is made otherwise than in the month of June the approval of the superior authority was necessary which was wanting. It is next submitted that those who have remained in the Bhojpur Collectorate for over eight years and for which the petitioner has cited certain names at Para 16 of the writ application have not been transferred whereas he has been singled out. The law stands settled that the government instructions and circulars with regard to transfer at best furnishes right to represent and do not furnish any legal right to found a cause of action. To that extent the application merits no interference. Despite refusal of the Court to interfere with the order of transfer, if the petitioner files a representation in terms of the government circulars quite naturally the respondents are required to consider the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of such submission. Naturally, if there be a policy for transfer after three years the government is required to meet out even handed treatment to all employees and should not leave any opportunity to make allegation of favoritism. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)