Cr Bail 10382/09 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench *** Cr. Msc. 4th Bail Appl. No.10382/2009 Raghunath Versus State Date of Order ::: 21/04/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Pankaj Gupta, for applicants Mr. Mahendra Meena, Public Prosecutor for State. 3rd Bail Appl.No.5582/2009 filed by petitioner was dismissed vide order dt. 20/07/2009 after statements of both the eye witnesses (Jitendra (PW2) & Balbir (PW-5)) were recorded during trial. Hence the petitioner has filed 4th bail application on the premise that complainant has filed application U/s 319 CrPC before the trial Court and on it being rejected, finally approached this Court in Cr. Revision Petition No.780/2009, which, as informed, was allowed vide order dt.01/04/2010. Counsel for petitioner has tried to persuade t examine the application once again on merits but this Court while examining the submissions, finds that what has been urged by Counsel in course of hearing on 4tth bail application is nothing but reiteration of what was contended at the stage when this Court had examined 1st & subsequent bail applications and these are no changes in circumstances which can be taken note of while examining instant Cr Bail 10382/09 //2// 4th bail application. As regards grievance of petitioner about the trial being stayed on the application filed by complainant U/s 319 CrPC, suffice it to say that it stands finally decided by this Court in criminal revision petition (supra) vide order dt.01/04/2010. Hence the learned trial Judge is now certainly expected to expedite the trial. However, there being no change in circumstances available after 3rd bail application being rejected by this Court, and taking an over-all conspectus of the material on record, this Court is not inclined to entertain 4th bail application. Consequently, 4th bail application is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p.2/ 10382Cr4thBail-09-DsApr21.doc