Crl.Misc. No.M-14210 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-14210 of 2011 . Date of decision: July 15, 2011. Amik Singh and another. .. Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab. .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.S.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Arshvinder Singh, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr.D.S.Malwai, Advocate, for the complainant. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered at the instance of Manjit Kaur alleging that on 29.04.2011, petitioner No.1 along with one Kulwant Singh entered into her house and assaulted her. Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1, has married the son of the complainant against the wishes of his parents and that they have got an order of protection of life and liberty from the Court. It is submitted that husband of petitioner No.1, has now committed acts of domestic violence as a result of which petitioner No.1, has filed a complaint against her husband and the . . . 1 Crl.Misc. No.M-14210 of 2011 complainant and the complaint filed by complainant Manjit Kaur is a counterblast to the said action of petitioner No.1. Counsel for the complainant has opposed the application for pre-arrest bail contending that petitioner Nos.1 & 2, have made an attempt to forcibly enter the house of the complainant and that in case concession of pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioners, they will again trespass the house of the complainant. I have heard the counsel for the petitioners, counsel for the complainant as well as the State counsel. All the offences lodged against the petitioners are bailable except for Section 452 IPC. The petitioners have already joined the investigation. This petition is allowed. It is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners, they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of arresting officer subject to following conditions: - (i) that the petitioners will join the investigation as and when required by the police; (ii) that the petitioners will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation, in any manner; (iii) that the petitioners will not make any attempt to forcibly enter the house of the complainant except by due process of law and will not commit any breach of peace during the pendency of the case. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE July 15, 2011. rka . . . 2