IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2230 of 2009 Between: Smt.M.Nagamani W/o.Sudhakar R/o.Door No.57-13-15/4 & 57-13/15/5, New Postal Colony, Patamata, Vijayawada. ..... PETITIONER AND Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondent Corporation as illegal, ultravires, provisions under Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also mandatory provisions of A.P. Municipal Corporation Act, and the rules framed thereunder on the subject besides directing the respondent Corporation to prevent from making any encroachments on a 80 feet public road situated in New Postal Colony of Patamata, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent: SMT.G.JHANSI The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.2230 of 2009 Order: The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of the property bearing Door Nos.57-13-15/4 & 57-13-15/5, New Postal Colony, 3rd Road, Patamata, Vijayawada having purchased the same under registered sale deeds. She states that as some anti-social elements are trying to raise temporary constructions on the public road, which substantially affect the rights of the residents of the locality, she made a representation on 30.12.2008 to the respondent, namely, the Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, Vijayawada, to take action against the culprits, in vain. Hence, the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for VMC appearing for the respondent, and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage. Admittedly, the representation made by the petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent. Hence, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction: The respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 30.12.2008, and pass appropriate orders thereon, expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 10.02.2009 VGB