IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4999 of 2006 THE BIHAR STATE SCHEDULED CASTE CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DARBHANGA NAMELY RAM BABU RAM, SON OF LATE SAKHICHAND RAM, RESIDENT OF SIPARA, P.S. PHULWARISARIF, DISTRICT- PATNA. :--PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, MUZAFFARPUR AT AND P.S. MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR 3. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, BEGUSARAI, AT AND P.S. BEGUSARAI, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. 4. DEVENDRA PASWAN, SON OF LATE SHIV PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHUA, P.S.- BAGHRA, SIMRI, VIA- BAHERI, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA :----RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 30.03.2011. In compliance of my order dated 15.3.2011 petitioner has produced a demand draft of Rs. 30,000/- dated 23.3.2011 drawn in the name of Devendra Paswan, Respondent No. 4 which is handed over to the learned counsel for Respondent No. 4 who is requested to grant a receipt on the margin of the order- sheet of this case and thereafter to hand over the same to Respondent No. 4. 2. In consideration of the payment made by the petitioner to Respondent No. 4 and with consent of Respondent No. 4 order dated 17.2.2006 dismissing Restoration Case No. 01/2003, Annexure- 2 and the other order passed in Misc. Case No. 09/1994 by which the said Misc. case was dismissed by the Labour Court, Muzaffarpur (Annexure-4) are set aside 2 with direction to the petitioner and Respondent No. 4 to appear in Misc. Case No. 09/1994 on 20th April, 2011 and contest the same which has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the ex parte Award dated 30.04.1994 in Reference Case No. 08/1992. The Labour Court, Muzaffarpur is directed to proceed with the hearing of Misc. Case No. 09/1994 on day-to-day basis and to conclude the same at the earliest, in any case within one month from the date of appearance of the parties. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court shall provide Respondent No. 4 the services of a lawyer from the District Legal Aid Authority, Muzaffarpur so as to enable him to contest his claim before the Labour Court in effective manner. 3. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Counsel for the State is present. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)