IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9526 of 2008 Decided on: 14.12.2010 Sanjeev Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record a copy of letter dated 15th March, 2007. A bare perusal of the same reveals that the salary of the petitioner has not been reduced. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 14, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?