war %? M1} PETITIONERS / : (DEFENDAN'IE APPELLANTS) 1. PANDIT RAVISHANKER SHUKLA UNIVERSITY, RAIPU R (ESTABLISHED UNDER RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY ACT AND EDUCATIONAL IN STITUTION) THROUGH — THE VICE CHANCELLOR SHRI LAXMAN CHATURVEDI, PANDIT RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR (c. G.) 2. THE REGISTRAR, PANDIT RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR (c. G.) 3. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, PANDIT RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR, THROUGH - SHRI PURAN BAIS, INCHARGE ENGINEER, PANDIT RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, RAIPUR. DISTRICT - RAIPUR (C. G.) VERSUS ESPONDENT (PLAINTIFF / RESPONDENT) SHRI MANGAL DUBEY MEMORIAL EDUCATION SOCIETY (REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETY REGISTRATION ACT, 1972) THROUGH - THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE TREASURER - SHRI SAMEER DUBEY, S/O LATE SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEY, AGED, - 35, YEARS, REGISTERED OFFICE — 6, DOONGAJI COLONY, DAGANIYA, RAIPUR (C- G-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT - BILASPUR w.P.(C)No. ‘WLQJ OF 2008 3 R @ \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE - 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA I-r-u PETITIONERS (DEFENDANTSI APPELLANTS) Versus RESPONDENT (PLAtNTIFF/ RESPONDENT) Shri Maiay Kumar Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner. Shri \fwek Chopra counsel for the respondent WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1‘ Shri Mangal Eduoation Society lNDtA oRALonnER (24.022010) ”i The petitioner is aggrieved by the Court order dated 11—19-2903" y, dismissing his appeal, which was preferred to challenge the order g, dated 04-07-2007 passed by the trial Court, allowing plaintiffs, apptication under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P‘C. (2) Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the three" pillars of grant of temporary injunotlon namely prima feoie case balance of convenience and irreparable loss are existing in favouro the plaintiff. This Court does not interfere in such matters when’the Courts below have exercised its discretion within four corners of law. Jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India isa-limited 7 jurisdiction which cannot be used as an appellate Court. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia is disposed of with the direction to the trial Court to dispose of the suit flied by the respondent: ) plaintiff as early as possible. LE , \ sd,_ Prashant Kumar Mlshra Judge Dubev l Mgmwial;,. , ‘ f :1