IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8608 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KAMLESHWAR BHARATBHAI SHAH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR NK MAJMUDAR for Petitioner MR PREMAL JOSHI for MR SP HASURKAR for Respondent No. 1 MS SEJAL K MANDAVIA for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 20/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Rule. As all the respondents are represented by the advocates, the matter is taken up for final hearing. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. I find sufficient merits in the contention raised by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 that this petition is premature. In para-11 (B) of the special civil application, the petitioner prayed for quashing and setting aside the action of the respondent No.2 of transferring him from District Panchayat, Bharuch to District Panchayat, Narmada. 3. This order has not been passed so far and this approach of the petitioner to this Court at this stage is nothing but only an abuse of the process of the Court. Not only this, it unnecessarily consumes the precious and valuable time of the Court which is already facing serious problem to overcome heavy pendency of the matters. 4. The special civil application is dismissed. Rule discharged. ********** zgs/-