^? ^ ? o'? BBII IN Tffi MAOHyA EB^ESH SEXEB A3M.tNISrB^a-lyE IB.IBUNM. »II•11 II It'KI.II l—tllll.BB•I l!l —II j| ^WNUIII 11111 • II •I l'" mi lll |1) ,i—|>—-»l*n*»iBr11'ir—l—l iwi.—riiii 'iii »iiiii •u'—'Niinniir'iii-tfin— BfifSi-LM CEIGI? !i4£lA.iL'j Asbefc Kuraa.e Roy Choirihary, son of Shri. AnS.aesh iioy Giioudhary, aged about .. y&ars, Besidenl; of Shank.a.c Nagar, naar Gur-afeu Faetory OlstEict BILASPUi (K.?.) N O ^ONsfigHiiSAHTS s 1. The State o£ Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary, Ministry of lisigati.pR (i»ater- Manageiaent) Valiabh Bbawan, B1QPAL (-KP.) The Engi.neer-In-Ghief, Masdev Kachhar.^a'ter Resou£ces Oopa-;tB^ent, Oisteict BILASPUR, (M.F.) The Chief Enginesr, Hasdev Mini.^iata Bangto Projesti BXI.ASPIK (M.P.) The Chief Engiaee.T; KachhaE ^ater manag ff 5,- Superinterrient Enginaer, Maniyast Hasdev Giscls', Distelct BILASPlfi (M«?.), 6. Sxecutiwe Engineer, '•'at'er Besourees Dspartraenfc, Oivlsion Kahghoxe, ^i-steict Baa-.ASPtB (a.».) o A. »• ._t;..);!.!lrislii;;^ ^StS^SlW^-f^-, ^i"'*.13''.^'**?''^^.^%S'"^Bi:-^^s7^s ^ •* r3 • • * • c^ • * APPIiICAIION UNBBB SEGl'ION 19 OF ADMINISSBA'TIVE TBI BH NAIS ACl', 1985 •^- •->!*. j-^-*- "\:w !• -:< : 7 , wuuxau^^ .-< *ll*1ril ^ITSF \dw| •^4NI«<1,UT^-d-IS, R«l'<iy< . (jL!,?<S,)tV°-|fP/oS' fn^F n sn^siwR-iitii ^asiSlf^VsPVS SB: Hon'ble Shri IVIanindra 3]T^?TIR?P (ijclije)^) W3^20— STaT8R^rfi?T3II^?T 19-01-2010 Smt. Mala Dubey, counsel Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy C; 1-feard. The grievance of the several representation made by respondents have not taken any submits that representation was another representation dated 02-03 On 16-12-2009, time was reply has been filed till date. Learned counsel for the considerafion ofrepresentafion. Taking into consideratton t] would be sen/ed, a djrecfion is decision on the representation ofj (Annexure A-7 & A-8}. The representation in continuation representation being made, the co| in accordance with law with a outei frssh representation, if any. With the aforesaid directionj !t is made clear that this Coij the case. <ni<4tn<Sli >fit«tY^T"fs'<t'!R|+5;1'( ^aKl'on^sT ijsr the petitioner. }ovt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. petitj|)ner as set out in the pefition is that in spite of jthe petitioner for adjustment of advances, the |decision in respect of the same. The petitioner nfiade on 20-05-1994 (Annexure A-7) followed by ^-1997(AnnexureA-8j. ^ranted to the respondents to file repiy, but no p^tit'oner submits that the main grievance is non- fie circumstences of the case, interest of justice fssued to the respondents to take appropriate the petitioner annexed along with the petition pet|tioner would be at liberty to submit a fresh ^f earlier representations made. On such fnpetent authority shall take appropriate decisjon limit of four months from the date of receipt of a |the pefition stands disposed of. |rt has not expressed any opinion OR the merits of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ~N