IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.121 of 2008 MOHAMMAD GHOLAM RASOOL @ GHULAM RASOOL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.5.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioner, the informant as well as the counsel for the State. Petitioner was working as Incharge Manager, UCO Bank, Gaya Branch. The allegation is that from the account of the informant all deposited amounts were withdrawn leaving only Rs.541/- in his account. The total amount withdrawn was Rs.1,38,800/-. Counsel for the informant submits that on all three occasion this petitioner had discharged the duty of comparing the signature and without any objection all money was withdrawn from the account of the informant. Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioner and informant prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Mohammad Gholam Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool is directed to surrender before the C.J.M.Gaya within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on provisional bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.Gaya in connection with Civil Line P.S.Case no.141 of 2006 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. One of the the condition for granting provisional anticipatory bail is that within four months, in four instalment of one month’s interval entire withdrawn amount will be deposited in the account of the informant. For four - 2 - months, i.e. the time allowed for depositing total withdrawal amount the petitioner will remain on provisional anticipatory bail. In case the entire amount is not deposited within four months the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner will be cancelled. The money which will be deposited by the petitioner will not cause any prejudice to the case which is still pending against him. This is only for the purpose of grant of anticipatory bail. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)