:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.228 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.228 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.228 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.5047 OF 2006 PPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.5047 OF 2006 PPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.5047 OF 2006 Union of India ...Applicant. v. Stanley Joseph Creado & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Rajguru a/w Ms.Nishi Kalani , advs. for the Applicant. Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Sr.Counsel i/by Purohit & Purohit , adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 15th February, 2008. DATE: 15th February, 2008. DATE: 15th February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. This application was taken out for condonation of delay in filing Appeal From Order. That suit was dismissed. Therefore, the appeal against order of the notice of motion in that suit would not be tenable and had become infructuous. In view of this development, this application for condonation of delay was also disposed off by order dated 30-8-2006. However, admittedly, later on the suit has been restored to the file. The applicant, i.e., Union of India has explained the delay in the application. Even though the delay is not very satisfactory, taking into consideration the :2: vast public property involved in the matter, I find that it will be in the interest of justice to condone the delay. Therefore, this application is allowed. Delay in filing appeal is hereby condoned. Appeal from Order be registered and listed for admission on 27th February, 2008. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)