IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14650 of 2011 Surendra Prasad S/O Shri Saryug Prasad R/O Sarda Chapra Panchayat, P.S. Rania Talab, Distt.-Patna. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. Of India, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. Dy. Development Commissioner, Patna. 3. B.D.O. Dulhin Bazar, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, Distt.-Patna. 4. Mukhiya, Sarda Chapra Panchayat, P.S. Raina Talab, Distt.-Patna. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Dulhin Bazar Block in the district of Patna, prays for quashing of the letter dated 4.8.2011 passed by the Block Development Officer, Dulhin Bazar, Patna, whereby he has been directed to refund Rs. 18,23,442/- toward the value of 1330 quintals of undistributed rice allotted to him under S.G.RY. Scheme at the A.P.L. rate of Rs.13.70 per Kgs. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice allotted to him. The petitioner submits that only 852 quintals of rice remains with him. He further submits that he has already deposited Rs.25,000/-. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and 2 C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 10% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within eight weeks. This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 10%. The respondent concerned would dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a further period of ten weeks. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)