IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2619 of 2011 Date of Decision: 21.4.2011 *** Rehman & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Surat Khan & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. Both the Courts below have refused to grant ad-interim injunction to the petitioners-plaintiffs. The grouse of the plaintiffs, whose land is admittedly adjacent to the land of the respondents, who are running fishery farm in their land, is that the latter have not complied with norms of fisheries Department and have made the pond on the ground level, due to which there is leakage of water to their fields, resulting into damage of the crops. The Fisheries Department, on the other hand, took the stand that the land where fishery farm is established by defendants No.1 to 7 is not a notified area and hence no licensee is required to issue for the construction of pond. That apart it has come on record that the land where private defendants made their fishery farm is a water logging area and hence there was no requirement of having particular depth of pond. Finding that the plaintiffs have no prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favour and are not going to suffer any irreparable loss in case the temporary injunction is not granted, the Courts below rightly dismissed the application of the petitioners. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly dismissed in limine. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE April 21 , 2011 Jiten