IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.68 OF 2006 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1486 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1486 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1486 OF 2006 M/s.3 Global Services Pvt. Ltd..Petitioners (Ori.Respnt.2) Vs. Maharashtra Sraksha Rakshak & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.C.U.Singh, Senior Counsel with Mr. Punit Anand for the Petitioner Mr. S. Mahadeshwar i/b. Ranjana Todankar, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Lata Desai i/b. Pallavi Devekar, for Respondent No.1. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS. MRS. MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE: 7TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . Petitioners seek review of the order dated 14th June, 2006 on the ground that they were not heard before the petition was finally heard and disposed of. On checking the records it is apparent that no appearance had been filed on behalf of the principal employer though at an ad-intrerim stage appearance had been put up. The notified board also does not disclose the name of any Advocate appearing for the principal employer. Considering the above in our opinion the order dated 14th June, 2006 is recalled. The petition to be placed on board for admission after two weeks. The ad-interim order granted to continue until further orders. Petition to be placed before appropriate bench. Review Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO J.) J.) J.) (MRS. (MRS. (MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J) V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J) V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J)