IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.THANKAPPAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2007 / 20TH ASHADHA 1929 CRL.A.No. 1204 of 2007() ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC.2/2007 IN SC.807/2001 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT-TRIAL OF ABKARI ACT CASES, NEYYATTINKARA .................... APPELLANT: APPELLANTS/ACCUSED ----------------------------- 1. LILLY PUSHPAM, W/O.GEORGE, NEDUVANVILA VAZHAVILAKOM VEEDU, PARASSALA, NEYYATTINKARA. 2. SARASAM, W/O.NESAMANI, ARUVIKKUZHI VEEDU, MURIYANKARA DESOM, PARASSALA, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.THANKAPPAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- CRL. APPEAL NO. 1204 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT The direction in the impugned order is to issue show cause notice against which an appeal will not lie. If the appellants are aggrieved by the impugned order, they can approach the trial court and give their explanation to the show cause notice. The Crl. Appeal is accordingly dismissed. (K.THANKAPPAN, JUDGE) sp/ 2