IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45350 of 2009 SHANKAR MAHTO & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : None ----------- 2 23.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This application has been filed for modification of order dated 04.12.2009 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40918 of 2009, whereby bail had been granted to the petitioner no. 3 and others. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the father’s name of petitioner no. 3 Rajesh Mahto had been wrongly described as “Shankar Mahto”, which should be “Bigu Mahto”. It is stated that in the first information report, the father’s name of petitioner no. 3, Rajesh Mahto, has been described as “Bigu Mahto”. Further submission is that in the vakalatnama also the father’s name of the petitioner no. 3 had been shown as “Bigu Mahto”. Submission is that inadvertently Shankar Mahto had been written in place of Bigu Mahto in the earlier application, which had been filed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is allowed. Let the order dated 04.12.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40918 of 2009, so far the petitioner no. 3 is concerned, be deemed to have been passed with respect to Rajesh Mahto son of Bigu Mahto. Order dated 04.12.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40918 of 2009 stands modified to the aforesaid extent only. Let this order be communicated through fax to the court concerned, if the petitioners deposit the requisite amount for the same. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)