IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14489 of 2010 MOTILAL MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHASR ----------- 2/ 12.5.2010 Heard. Regard being had to the fact that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased, the renewal prayer appears inconsequential and of no merit. The petition is dismissed. However, from the record made by the learned trial court, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge FTC I, Supaul, the trial of the case (S.T. No. 286 of 2007) appears in progress and issuing processes for production of the remaining non-official witnesses as back as on 15.9.2007 does not appear having any effect on him also because he did not make any enquiry as to why five months that had elapsed between 15.9.2009 and 17.2.2010 and no witness could be produced during that period. The trial judge is a fast track court and he appears running into decelerate speed. He is expected to pull up all threads under his thumbs to ensure that the witnesses are produced on day to day basis so that the trial of the case is concluded at the earliest. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)