IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 25TH MAGHA 1929 W.P.(C).No. 35673 of 2007(V) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- P.ABDURAHIMAN, S/O.MOHAMMED, "RASNALAYAM" P.O., MUNDERI, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 3. P.K.NAZEEM, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, KHAMAR MANZIL, KARAKKUNNU, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.M.R. SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.35673/07 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: 1) EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ROUTE MAP 2) EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 03.03.2006 3) EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE STAT ERNAKULAM DATED 19.09.2006 IN MVARP NO.1/1/2006 4) EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THEPROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 9.8.07 5) EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.18.8.07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 6) EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.6.9.07 OF THE STAT IN M.V.A.R.P. No.3/5/2007 7) EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.24.10.07 OF THE STAT IN M.V.A.R.P. NO.412/2007 T R U E C O P Y PA TO JUDGE rp/- ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 35673 OF 2007 V ==================== Dated this the 14th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T It is submitted that against Ext.P4 order of the 1st respondent settling timings of the petitioner, revision was filed by the 3rd respondent and that revision was disposed of by the Tribunal setting aside Ext.P4 and remanding the matter for reconsideration. The complaint of the petitioner is that timing conference has not been held thereafter and therefore he seeks an order requiring the respondents to expeditiously convene the timing conference. 2. In view of the fact that by Ext.P6, Ext.P4 settling timings have been set aside and the matter is remanded, 1st respondent has to expeditiously complete the proceedings. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the 1st respondent shall implement Ext.P6 judgment as WPC 35673/07 :2 : expeditiously as possible with notice to the parties concerned. This shall be done at any rate within a period of eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp