Civil Revision No. 6256 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6256 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.9.2010 Satish Kumar …Petitioner Versus Dhirender Pal Gupta and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The petitioner is running a grocery shop in the demised premisses. The Rent Controller, Narwana, relying upon the rent note dated 1.1.1997, has determined the rent of the demised shop as Rs.15,000/- for the period of six months. The contention of the tenant that the rent was Rs.12,000/- per annum was rejected. The Rent Controller has rightly opted to rely upon the rent note instead of bahies and account books produced by the tenant. The exercise to assess the provisional rent is interim in nature. The Revisional Court will not vary it unless the same causes acute hardship. The petitioner may comply with the order dated 17.8.2010, passed by the Rent Controller. Subject to the evidence to be adduced by the parties, the Rent Controller shall determine the quantum of rent and Civil Revision No. 6256 of 2010 2 if it comes to the conclusion that the provisional rent, so paid, is in excess and the same shall be adjusted qua future rent. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed, in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 27, 2010 “DK”