1 cas 629.2010.doc srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 629 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2006 Mrs. Pushpabai Popatlal Jain ....Applicant Versus Shri Ratanlal Malaji Shah ...Respondent Ms. Nikita Trivedi h/f YKS LEGAL for Applicant. Mr. Hemant Ghadegaonkar i/b Sanjeev Gorwadkar for Respondent. CORAM : R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 2ND AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel. No case for appointing receiver is made out. The order passed by this court on 9th October, 2006 sufficiently takes care of Applicant’s interests. There is no question of even granting a further injunction since this court had already said on 9th October, 2006 that the adversary shall not create any third party rights in the suit property during the pendency of the Second Appeal, So even if such rights are created In face of this order they have no meaning. The learned counsel requests that the adversary may be asked to remove the goods which are lying in the property. No such order can be made in this proceeding. 2 Application stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.) 1