1-4 «.j ca Kl ....-» ^'.y n c» £ ^ f~< o IW%J § 3 1-i .'«) ..« !<: 0=! j^- II s & i S3 t°!.l £! t-'i '§1"58 6 's §>s-s i|^ 11 -^ -^ g1 ^ ^ sm'^ o ^ (S ^."^ §1 gi S, a> k < >-. Q 4"1 ^' |u T"^ T"^§s lil Q-a &,II •sS DQ ®.'-1 faO .w d .4-Ji® 1° ^ 83 ^ ^s is^ 1("^ O r^Cl <<-< s -« "S S (," s ff 111 ffi OT K <fl. ,si ^- 0 ®s-^ ^(^" \:^^. ^ Xi-HC-22 -s^ -sfpr^w, 'g^flTms. tsrar-i^ •S' Zl w -^- w. s%z-\ /^oor' sii??i?n ft-IR; SIliFCT gnN;:Hf?g sn^i'FRiiWHto afepfn-WRff •? fe^-Tfsi -L- ^srfSgnaT!^ -1- Sllri Vishnu Kosta, counsel for the pejtitioner. Shn Vivels ShaiTna, Panel Lawyer foij tfae State^ on ath'arice copy. Heard. Counsel for the petitioner submits t}iat the petitioner has been transfeired by order !. . _ .. . ". ,....!" lated 9-11-2005 during the ban period vvith()ut the concurrence or approval ofthe Mimsta', ^.'hieh is m conteavention to the policy. He llurther submits that for the present the petitioner lay be siven an opportumty to file a re^resentation to the competent authorifies of the respondents which may be eonsidered on its |»wnmerits. The prayer is not opposed by the Staljs Counsel. j ' Ha^'ing considered and without expiisssmg any opinion on the merits ofthe case, in 1, . . .-.,.„ ^. ..!..,, , . fhe opinion of this Court, ends of justic^ wffl be seived if a dii'ection' is aiven to tlie ietitioner to make a detailed representatiijn raising his grievances before fhe .competent ^ulliority of respondents along with a copy ^sfthe petition and this ordsr wifliin 15 days ancl Jon such representation beina filed, the ooitlpetent authorih' of the respondents shaB decide the same on te own merits in accordance w|th law as eariy as possible preferabfy wit'nin hvo Imonths fi'om the date of receipt of the repiissentation. It is made clear that 'if any grievance i . ' ^ ' 1 • . |remams, the petirioner may avail the remedy trv-ailable under the law. Counsel fiuthersubnuts that the pttitioner has not been relieved and he may be i • • i . jallowed to cbntinue till the decision ofthe re|iresentation. It is directed fhat if the petitioner) has not been relieved, he may be allowed to |contiaue till the representation is decided. ! With the aforesaid obsen'ations. this betition stands disposed of. ] Cossequemly M.W.P.No. 4619/200^ and LA. No. 9733/2005 also stand disposed of Certified copy as per rules. ' ] —37^—' —~ Fakhruddin Judge