((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.387 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Lata D. Pawar Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.388 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Parvatibai Shankar Gadge Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.389 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Jagannath S. Yadav Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.390 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Jiyachidevi B. Gupta Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.391 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Moti M. Rajbhar Applicant ((-2-)) versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 M.T.Sharma Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.393 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Balu N. Walunj Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.394 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 Samuel Kolipillai Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent ALONG WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.395 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.7 OF 1984 K.B.Ghosh Applicant versus The Official Liquidator Respondent Mr.B.G.Saraf for applicants. Ms.K.V.Gautam, Acting O.L. present. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 28th July 2006 PC : ((-3-)) 1. For the reasons set out in the accompanying affidavit, delay in filing the claim before the Official Liquidator is condoned. The Official Liquidator to adjudicate the claims on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously. No order as to costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)