L.R. Sahu S/o Late Sunehar Ram Sahu, aged about 50 years, working as Rural Agricultural Extension Officer, R/o Rampur ward, Near Gaura Choura, District Dhamtari (C.G.) XERSHS § 13mm 21. , ’wi‘gr‘ w“,__ 67 x /Z. /6. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) The Additional Director, Directorate ofAgriculture, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) The Deputy Director, Agriculture District Dhamtari (C.G.) The Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block and District Dhamtari (C.G.) The Sub-Divisional Officer /3. .. . ’ $7}, M, _ §X§5f C) 7 , z @ Creek» [SDO), Agriculture, Office of the Agriculture, Block and District Dhamtari (C.G.) /7. Shri lshak Yashinee, Agriculture g Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Korba (C.G.) (8. Shri T.K.Patel, Agriculture “‘ Development Officer, Office of § the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ianjgir-Champa (C.G.) /9. Shri S.K. Raddey, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Dandewada (C.G.) Shri Udai Ram Nayak, 1 Agrlculture Development flag) \aé w [ 3593c ‘ ‘ .. Officer, Office of the Deputy 53* / L Director Agriculture, District \ / W ' "ua‘5\\}/ g Mahasamund [C.G.) /11. Shri B.S. Sahu, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Shri S.R. Paradkar, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Kabirdham (C.G.) wr’s» "; y , J'§ v" \ 63 Shri Mahadu Thakre, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Shri S.C. Kashyap, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Jashpur [C.G.) Shri Khilli Singh, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ambikapur (C.G.) Shri Pradeep Kumar Soni, Agriculture Development Officer, Office ofthe Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ambikapur (C.G.) Shri B.P.Sharma, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Shri R.K.]hariya, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ambikapur (C.G.) Shri R.P.]aiswal, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of kwv /13. ’ 14. /15. /‘16. /17. A8. /19. the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Korba (C.G.) /20. Shri N.K. Aaich, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ambikapur (C.G.) /21. Shri P.L. Rajput, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Kabirdham (C.G.) /22. Shri Daya Lal Sahu, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Durg (C.G.) /23. Shri P.L. Upadhayay, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 24. Shri P.B. Shah, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Kanker (C.G.) /25. Shri B.L. Karsh, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Raipur (C.G.) Shri D.C. Giri, Agriculture 26. Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agrioulture, District Iagdalpur (C.G.) 27. Shri S.K. Pandey, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ianjgir (C.G.) Shri K.K. Sahu, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / 29. Shri Naresh Kumar Shakya, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Koria (C.G.) /30. Shri M.R. Sahu, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Dhamtari (C.G.) /31. Shri LL. Patkar, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Iagdalpur (C.G.) 32. Shri R.N.Sahu, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Raigarh (C.G.) w Shri L.N. Gopal, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ianjgir (C.G.) Shri K.G. Goswami, Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Shri Harish Chandra Prasad. Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Deputy Director Agriculture, District Ambikapur (C.G.) /34. /3s. HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1502 OF 2011 PETITIONER L.R.Sahu Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Sameer Behar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State. RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 18‘“ day of March; 201 1) The petitioner impugns the legality and validity of the communication dated 1.2.2011 (Annexure P-i), wherein, he has been informed by the Additional Director, Agriculture, that his case was considered for promotion to the post of Agriculture Extension Officer by the departmental scrutiny/promotion committee and on consideration of all the aspects of the matter, he could not acquire the required marks, on the basis of evaluation and recommendation, for promotion to the higher post. The petitioner is not in a position to point out any irregularity or illegality in the proceeding of the committee. which is contrary to the recommendation made by the committee, according to him. The entire challenge of the petitioner is on the basis that there was no adverse remark against the petitioner, as no adverse remarks were communicated to the petitioner. Thus, if the petitioner has all good records, the petitioner being senior most ought to have been granted promotion. The further contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the criteria for promotion is seniority-cum— 2 fitness. Thus, without assigning reasons, the case of the petitioner could not have been ignored. The allegations of the petitioner cannot be considered without producing a document, wherein it has been found proved that the case of the petitioner was not considered in accordance with law. The petitioner has further not produced any document including the proceedings, which can be challenged on the ground of perversity and irregularity, but challenge on any other ground is not maintainable. ln view of that, this Court cannot adjudicate upon any decision on recommendation, which appears to be in accordance with law. Consequently, the petitioner is not entitled to any direction or relief, as submitted by him. Accordingly, the writ petition,'being bereft of merit, is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/_ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge s ashok