IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 11593 of 2005(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ R.CHANDRIKA, AGED 41 YEARS, D/O. ROSAMMA, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, KAPPIKAD, POOVACHAL, PERUMKULAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF SRI.A.MUHAMMED HASHIM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R), NEDUMANGAD. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, PERUMKULAM. 4. KERALA STATE BACKWARD CLASSES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY G.P. SMT.SMITHA SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION APPEARED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DT.14.12.95. P2: TRUE OCPY OF PETITION DT.3.10.2001 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE R1. P3: TRUE COPY OF PLAINT O.S. NO.626/2001 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE MUNSIFF COURT, NEDUMANGAD. P4: TRUE COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT DATED NIL FILED BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, NEDUMANGAD IN O.S. NO.626/2001. P5: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT.10.8.2001 OF R2. P6: TRUE COPY OF PETITION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE R4 DT.3.3.2005. P7: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DT.23.9.99 ISSUED BY R4. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.11593 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 6th day of June, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging recovery proceedings for recovery of loan availed from 4th respondent. This court while admitting the W.P. on 6.4.2005 granted instalment facility to the petitioner to clear the arrears in monthly instlaments of Rs.5,000/-. If petitioner had complied with the interim order, then liability would have been settled now. However, neither the petitioner nor the 4th respondent has informed this court as to what happened. In any case in view of the relief granted by this court in the form of instalment facility through interim order, no further orders are required in the W.P. The W.P. is accordingly closed leaving freedom to the respondents to proceed for recovery, if petitioner has not complied with the interim order. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms