IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12037 of 2009 SHAMBHU NATH YADAV, son of Late Sri Kishun Yadav, R/o Village and P.O. Kulaharia, P.S. Buxar (Moffasil), District Buxar (Bihar). ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA through Home Secretary, Govt. of India, Central Secretariat, New Delhi. 2. The Director General of C.R.P.F., New Delhi, C.G.O. Complex, R.K. Puri, New Delhi-67. 3. D.I.G., C.R.P.F., Group Centre Mokamaghat, Patna Pin-803303. 4. The Commandant, C.R.P.F. 11 Battalion, C.R.P.F., 82 Miles Nalkatta, Distt. Dhalai, Tripura. 5. Chief General Manager, S.B.I., L.H.O.Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 6. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Chausa (Buxar), Bihar. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 10.9.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents no.1 to 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of his son, who was working as a Constable under the administrative control of respondent no.3, on 29.11.2008, the petitioner, who is the father and is dependent upon his deceased son, is entitled to receive the terminal benefits payable on account of his death. It is submitted that the very perusal of the letter No.R.F.3/09-10 dated 22nd of June, 2009, as contained in Annexure 3, it would appear that a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- has been paid to the widow of the deceased employee, namely, Ranjana Devi. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 to 4 submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his claims, the same would be considered as per 2 law without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the D.I.G., C.R.P.F., Group Centre, Mokamaghat, Patna (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be redressed without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)