vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7643 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7643 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.7643 OF 2008 Dr.Kalpana Sudhir Wandrekar ... Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.P.A. Saratkar for Petitioner Mr.S.R. Nargolkar, AGP, for Respondent No.1 Mr.S.A. Bhagwat for Resp. No.3 CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & BILAL NAZKI & BILAL NAZKI & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 28, 2008 NOVEMBER 28, 2008 NOVEMBER 28, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner has challenged the Government Resolution dated 11.12.1999 which amongst others lays down the age of superannuation of the teachers in the University. The petitioner is a reader in the Respondent University and is due to retire on attaining the age of 60 years by 30.11.2008. She challenges clause 22 of the Government Resolution on the ground that the University Grants Commission (UGC) had recommended that the teachers of the University should be retired at the age of 62 years. This issue has already been considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.5338 of 2007 and the Division Bench has found that it : 2 : is the power of the Government to describe the age of superannuation and the recommendation of the UGC would not bind the State Government. Following the same judgment, the Writ Petition is dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)