CRM No. M-3122 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-3122 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.03.2009 Gurpreet Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Aman Sibia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Gupta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Arun Bansal and Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advocates, for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J. CRM No.13173 of 2009 This is an application for impleading the persons mentioned in para no.3 of the application as respondents in this petition. Application is allowed. The persons mentioned in para no.3 of the application may be impleaded as respondents No.3 to 5 in the main petition. Memo of parties be amended accordingly. CRM No. M-3122 of 2009 The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.100 dated 8.3.2001, under Sections 147, 149, 188, 342, 447, 452, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula (Annexure P-1), on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. CRM No. M-3122 of 2009 2 Respondents No.3 and 4 are stated to be daughters of the petitioner. Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in Court. The complainant is duly identified by his counsel. He has filed an affidavit, which is taken on record as Mark 'A' admitting therein the factum of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. He states that he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed qua all the accused. The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings, which would be a futile exercise. In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE March 19, 2009 'rajpal'