IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.823 of 2011 RAJU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with G.R.P. Patna P.S. Case No. 395 of 2010 registered under section- 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR but it appears from perusal of impugned order as well as case diary that name of this petitioner came in this case in course of investigation on the basis that he used the mobile set of victim after the alleged occurrence. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner found the above-said mobile in abandoned condition and used the said mobile without having any ill- motive. It is also contended by him that admittedly, no ransom demand was made and, moreover, the I.O. uptill now has not verified about the presence of the victim at his native place. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Raju Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with G.R.P. Patna P.S. Case No. - 2 - 395 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)