* HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA + CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3705 OF 2009 Dated 17.08.2009 Kasarla Rama Subbaiah ……….. Petitioner Vs. 1. Boleddula Padmavathi and another ………… RESPONDENTS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3705 OF 2009 O R D E R: This Court ordered notice before admission on 12.8.2009 and granted interim stay for a period of one week. 2. Heard Sri B.S.Reddy, representing the petitioner and Smt.V.Hima Bindu, representing R-1 and Sri P.Veera Reddy, representing R.2. 3. The Civil Revision Petition is filed against an order made in I.A.No.272 of 2009 in C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 dated 1.8.2009. The said application was filed under Order 41 Rule 5 and Section 151 of the CPC praying for stay of orders made in E.P.No.321 of 2006 in O.S.No.36 of 2005 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Nandyal. The learned Judge having taking into consideration the respective stands taken by the parties, ultimately came to the conclusion that this is not a fit matter, where stay of proceedings to be granted and accordingly dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition had been preferred. It appears, an application under Order 21, Rule 90 of the CPC was filed and the same was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the CMA had been preferred and an application for grant of stay had been filed and the learned III Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal after recording reasons, dismissed the said application. It is no doubt true that while considering an application for grant of stay, the facts and circumstances of a particular given case to be looked into, and discretion to be exercised. Here is a case, where an application to set aside sale had been filed on certain grounds. No doubt it is contended by Sri Veera Reddy that all the grounds are untenable grounds, this Court does not interfere to express any opinion relating to these aspects. However, since the CMA No.3 of 2009 itself can be disposed of by the learned III Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal, at the earliest point of time, this Court is of the considered opinion that this Civil Revision Petition be disposed of with a direction to maintain status-quo till the disposal of the C.M.A.No.3 of 2009 and let the learned Judge dispose of the C.M.A. itself within a period of four weeks from today. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. _________________ P.S.NARAYANA,J 17th August, 2009. Note: Issue copy in three days. B/o PNV