FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLN. NO. 822 OF 2011 ( The State of Maharashtra Vs. Saudagar s/o. Kisan Shep & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. K. G. Patil, APP for appellant. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 24th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned APP for the appellant. 2. Perused the original record and proceedings. We have perused the evidence of injured eye witnesses, medical evidence, medical certificates and the reasoning adopted by the learned Trial Judge. 3. We are convinced to admit the appeal to the extent of respondent Nos. 1 to 3. We do not find sufficient and convincing evidence on record against the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in the appeal filed by the State. Therefore, the findings in respect of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 reached by the learned Trial Judge do not call for interference. 5. The appeal is admitted against respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and action under section 390 of Criminal Procedure Code be initiated against them and the same is dismissed as against respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 6. Record and proceedings be sent back forthwith. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/cria12.11