IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18125 of 2008 OM PRAKASH AGRAWAL & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating therein to the effect that after the impugned order the Court below has framed the charges on 12th April, 2010, however, no witness has been examined after the framing of the charges. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner that no offence is made out under sections 103 & 104 of the Trade & Merchandise Act, the matter is before the trial Court for consideration and if need be there is also provision for altering the charge. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the impugned order and further development that the charge has been framed, it will be open for the petitioner, if so advised, to make proper application with regard to his grievances that no offence is made out under sections 103 & 104 of the Trade & Merchandise Act. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)