IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.301 of 2010 1. SURENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE DEOKI SINGH R/O MOHALLA- INDRA NAGAR, ROAD NO. 3, P.S. KANKARBAGH, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MR. AFJAL IMAM ABDULLAH, THE SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. MR. K. SANTHIL KUMAR, COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDHA MARG, PATNA, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 2. 30.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation and the State. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that although the petitioner has filed a representation pursuant to the order of this Court, however, no specific claim has been disclosed in the said representation and as such the allegation of the petitioner that the authorities have committed contempt of this Court is not correct. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although documents are not filed, however, those documents were available with the Corporation. Considering the rival submission of the parties, I do not find any cause to proceed further in this case. The same is accordingly dismissed. 2 However, it will be open for the petitioner to file a fresh representation enclosing distinctly the details of unpaid claim as also copy of the relevant documents in support of such claim within a period of two weeks. Till such representation is filed, the claim of the petitioner be considered. Anand Kr. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)