RSA No.2235 of 2007 Present: Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the plaintiffs-appellants. **** This is an appeal filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below. The plaintiffs-appellants have filed a suit alleging that drain/s being constructed abutting their houses would be a nuisance. Both the Courts below have concurrently found against the plaintiffs-appellants and have held that no nuisance would be caused to the plaintiffs-appellants by the construction of the drain/s and that rather the said construction was a measure of social hygiene and cleanliness. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs-appellants has not been able to persuade me that the findings of fact are perverse or that they do not arise from the evidence before the Courts. Consequently, I hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in this appeal and consequently dismiss the same without cost. October 22, 2008 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE