1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1986 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTIONNO.2829 OF 2009 Shaheeda A Tarani .. Plaintiff -versus Zeenat A Tarani and 2 ors .. Defendants Mr. H. M. Thakore, i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Plaintiff. Mr. Shashi Pandey, for the defendant No.1. Mr. Ashok Davar, i/b K. R. Shekhawat, for the defendant Nos 2 * 3. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 18th January, 2010 P.C. 1. In a suit for administration of estate of Zarina Anwarali Tarani, the parties ie plaintiff and defendant who are related to each other have settled the matter. Accordingly the parties have signed consent terms and their respective advocates countersigned the same. 2. There is no objection of any kind to the identification, signature and authority. The statement is also made that no third party or person who are involved will be affected by this 2 settlement. The consent terms is marked 'X'. Only Defendant No.3 is present. Both parties and their respective advocates make statement that the consent term is taken care of all the aspects to settle the matter between the parties. 3. The suit is disposed of in view of the consent terms with liberty to the parties who are absent and who are not present in the Court to apply for appropriate orders if necessary. Refund of Court fee in accordance with law. ( ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)