SBCMA No.1507/2008 MD, RSRTC, Anupgarh Vs. Jagdev Singh -[ 1 ]- SBCMA No.1507/2008 MD, RSRTC, Anupgarh Vs. Jagdev Singh DATE OF ORDER : - 1.12.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.PK Lohra,for the appellant. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The appellants are aggrieved against the award dated 22.8.2008 passed by the learned Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Sri Ganganagar in case WC No.15/97 by which on account of injury suffered by the employee, the tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.63,346/- by taking help of Schedule I under Section 2(1) and (4) and entry 25 therein. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the claimant was not in regular employment and he was a contract labour only as stated by the appellant's witness PW-1. It is also submitted that the doctor certified disability of 25% when the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner assessed the disability by taking help of Schedule I entry 25 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, which is wrong. I perused the reasons given in the impugned order. SBCMA No.1507/2008 MD, RSRTC, Anupgarh Vs. Jagdev Singh -[ 2 ]- The appellant admittedly did not produce contract on the basis of which they are submitting that the workman was contract labour and admittedly, he suffered injury when he was working for the appellant. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarded compensation as per the entry 25 of the Schedule I of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. I do not find any illegality in the impugned award. Hence, the appeal of the appellant is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-