IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 15096 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 15th March, 2010. Gurpreet Kaur Petitioner through Mr. G.S.Bal, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 01.07.2009 [Annexure P-9] whereby she has been reverted from the post of Head Constable to that of Constable. She was promoted on account of her performance in the sports category, according to her, within the 10% permissible quota. The respondents, in their counter-affidavit do not dispute that the name of the petitioner was approved against 10% quota of 'List 'C'. However, it is alleged that her seniors have been over- looked. This Court vide order dated 04.03.2010 passed in CWP No. 566 of 2010 [Ranjit Singh & Ors. V State of Punjab & Ors.], has constituted an Officers-Committee consisting [i] Shri Parag Jain, IPS, IGP/Head Quarters, Punjab Police; [ii] Smt. Gurpreet Kaur Deo, IPS, DIG, Administration, Punjab Police Headquarters; and [iii] Shri M.S.Gill, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, attached with the DGP, Punjab to consider and redress the grievances of Police Personnel like the petitioner. Since the controversy can be resolved after verifying factual aspects, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a comprehensive representation before the afore- stated Officers'-Committee, who shall then, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing, make appropriate recommendations as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. March 15, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE