IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRR No.1128 of 2003 Date of decision : 19.1.2011 Mukesh Kumar ..........Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ..........Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : Present : Mr.Ashit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms.Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) : This is a revision against the concurrent judgment of the Courts below convicting the petitioner under Section 304A read with Section 279 IPC and sentencing him to undergo one year imprisonment. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken me through the judgments of the Courts below but has not been able to point out any pulpable perversity or even arguable arbitrariness finding resulting in the conviction of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has then stated that in any case the petitioner deserves some leniency in the sentence. It is not disputed that the unfortunate accident involving the petitioner, took place on 21.1.1995 and since then he has been suffering this prosecution. He stated that as per the custody certificate placed on record, the petitioner has undergone four months and 30 days, out of total sentence of one year. In the circumstance, even while upholding the conviction, I deem it appropriate to reduce the sentence of the petitioner to that already undergone. This Criminal Revision is disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE 19.1.2011 akm