In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. RSA No.2424 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on December 09,2009. Paramjit Singh -- Appellant vs. Gurbachan Singh and others --Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.N.L.Sammi,Advocate, for the appellant Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) This is plaintiff's appeal being unsuccessful in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction before both the Courts below. The plaintiff has alleged that he is the son of Balwant Singh and Surinder Kaur, whereas defendant No.1 is the son from defendant No.2 who is the second wife of Balwant Singh, who had solmnised his second marriage with Jagir Kaur-defendant No.2 without dissolving the first marriage with his mother. The plaintiff has sought a declaration that he is owner in possession, of a house left by Balwant Singh, on the basis of a Will dated 06.1.1993 whereas defendant No.1 claimed the same property on the basis of a Will dated 20.9.1993, purported to have been executed by Balwant Singh in his favour. Shorn of unnecessary details, the core question involved in the suit is in respect of validity of the Will dated 06.1.1993 on the basis of which the plaintiff has set up his claim over the suit property. RSANo.2424 of 2009 (O&M) -2- Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff has miserably failed to prove his claim as he did not produce the original Will on record. On the contrary, the Will Ex.D-1 produced by defendant No.1 has been duly proved by examining the attesting witnesses namely Ram Singh and Avtar Singh. Moreover, the Courts had found that the plaintiff could not prove his possession over the property in question. Therefore, he had no right to seek injunction. Even before this Court, no meaningful argument has been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant in order to challenge the judgment and decree of the Courts below, which is based upon finding of fact, nor any substantial question of law has been raised for consideration of this Court. Keeping in view the totality of circumstances of this case, I do not find any merit in the present appeal and the same is hereby dismissed in limine, though without any order as to costs. December 09,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge