1 wp10093.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 10093 of 2009 Mr. Sudhir Chintamani Limaye ... Petitioner v/s. M/s. Sarosh Constructions and Developers & ors. ... Respondents Mr. T.D. Deshmukh for the petitioner. Smt. Sangeeta S. Vaidya for respondents 1-5. Mr. S.I. Shah for respondent no. 15. Mr. Mandar Soman for respondents 6,8,9 and 24. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J DATED :- MARCH 24, 2011. P.C. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard by consent. 3. All the parties agree that interest of justice would be sub-served by directing the learned trial Court to decide all the three suits between the 2 wp10093.09.sxw parties i.e. RCS No. 195/2009, 124/2003 and 7/2002 together. The learned Principal District Judge is directed to assign all the three suits to the same Presiding Officer. The learned Counsel for the original defendants in RCS No. 195/2009 makes a categorical statement that written-statement on behalf of said defendants would be filed within a period of four weeks from today. 4. In that view of the matter, the learned trial Court would decide the three suits together, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. 5. Needless to state that the Court has not considered the matter on its merits and all contentions available to the parties are kept open. (B.R. GAVAI, J)