THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.11937 of 2011 Dated 15th November, 2011 Between: P.Eswara Rao and others …Petitioners And The State of A.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.Sai Rama Murthy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 4: GP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.2: GP for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri P.Roy Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent herein in not referring the matter under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act to the civil Court for fixing the compensation so far as the petitioners herein are concerned in pursuance of the legal notice dated 12.12.2010 got issued by them, is illegal, unconstitutional, and contrary to Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent herein to refer the above matter to the concerned civil Court.” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri K.Sai Rama Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners, sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his clients to file a fresh writ petition questioning the award passed under Section 11(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.14596 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th November, 2011 VGB