W.P.No.8099/2011 07/12/2011 Shri Neeraj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the controversy involved in the matter is finally decided by this Court in Writ Petition No.6773/2006 (Prerna vs. State of MP), decided at Indore Bench. He submits that he intends to prefer a representation, which may be directed to be decided by the respondents No.2 and 3, in the light of the judgment in Prerna's case (supra), within a stipulated time. The aforesaid innocuous relief prayed for is not opposed by Shri Raghuvanshi, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits and entitlement of the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with the following directions: (1) The petitioner shall prefer a detailed along with the judgment in Prerna's case (supra) and other judgments he wants to place reliance before respondents No.2 and 3, within 10 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the W.P.No.8099/2011 order. (2) The said respondents shall consider and examine the applicability of such judgments in case of petitioner. In the event the authorities come to the conclusion that the petitioner is entitled for similar benefits and claims, the claims be paid to the petitioner within 60 days. The respondent while deciding the representation shall pass a reasoned and speaking order. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (Sujoy Paul) Judge Yog/-