IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1290 of 2009 VINAY KUMAR YADAV @ MANNU Versus KUMAR CHIRANJEEV RAI @ SALOO & ORS. ----------- 05/ 09.03.2011 This petition has been filed for restoration of C.R. No.916 of 2005, which was dismissed for default against opposite party nos.4, 5 and 6 due to non-compliance of order of this court dated 08.01.2008 by which two weeks peremptory time was allowed to the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of notice for opposite party nos.4, 5 and 6. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been shown due to which the said order could not be complied within the prescribed time. However, the said order was complied subsequently when learned counsel for the petitioner came to know about the aforesaid order dated 08.01.2008. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and C.R. No.916 of 2005 is restored to its original file and number. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)