1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NOS.923/07; 921/2007 in FA ST.NO.21560/2006; CA NOS.926/07; 925/07 in FA ST.NO.21553/2006; CA NOS.1046/07; 1045/2007 IN FA ST NO.21565/2006. Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 16th JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- . Heard Mr.Bhosale for the acquiring body in each of the case. He informs that FA No. 3246/2008 to 3256/2008 in group of 110 First Appeals is admitted by this Court by condoning delay by order dated 27.6.2008. He has alleged that by applying the same scale, as the matters are from the same Reference, need to be accepted. 2) This submission cannot be obliterated as no divergent view can be expressed. 3) The appellant is the acquiring body. By virtue of 2 Government Notification it has come into acceleration to meet past and future claim in relation to the acquisition of property for different Govt. projects. Consequently, interests of the appellant/corporation are involved in the matter, leave to file appeal in each of the case granted. 4) There is delay of 230 days in each of the matters. The delay is for the reasons stated in the application, condoned. Both the applications are allowed as above. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca923.07