:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2170 OF 2005 Rameshchandra Hagamilal Ajmera ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.A.P. Mundargi, with Mr. P.P. Runwal, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 11th April 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. The Applicant apprehends that he is likely to be arrested in connection with CR.No.12/2005 registered with Sinnar Police Station, District Nashik. According to the Applicant, he is licensed dealer in giletine and explosive goods. The prosecution case is that co-accused was :2: accosted while carrying the said items unauthorisedly. As the Applicant apprehended arrest in connection with the said offence, as the co-accused was his employee, the Applicant has approached this Court. . During the pendency of this application, the investigating officer was of the view that if the Applicant makes himself available for interrogation, the stand taken on behalf of the Applicant can be ascertained and further action against the Applicant can be proceeded thereafter. In view of that, the Applicant has reported to the investigating officer and has co-operated during the course of interrogation, as is stated by the learned A.P.P. on instructions. Learned A.P.P. further states that so far no incriminating material has been found. If it is so, this application is disposed of with direction to the investigating officer to give 72 hours’ advance notice to the Applicant in case he decides to arrest the Applicant in connection with the alleged offence on being satisfied that the further material collected by him indicates complicity of the Applicant. It :3: is, however, made clear that the Applicant shall extend complete co-operation for the purpose of investigation as and when required. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)