CWP-8936/06 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8936/2006 Tarun Gupta Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date Of Order :: 04/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Ms. Anuradha Soni on behalf of Mr. Rajendra Soni, for petitioner. Mr. S.D. Khaspuria, Dy. Govt. Counsel, for respondents. Application has been filed along with which a copy of the judgment of the coordinate bench of this Court dt.4.8.09 in CWP-5184/95 has been placed on record. Counsel for petitioner submits that the issue raised in the instant petition has been decided by the Court vide judgment dt.4.8.09 while disposing of the writ petition no.5184/1995 and submits that in the light of the judgment referred to supra the present petition may also be disposed of. This fact has not been controverted by respondents' counsel as well about the issue being decided by this Court referred to supra. The operative part of the judgment dt.4.8.09 reads as under :- “However, it is observed that the discussion made in this judgment may not be CWP-8936/06 (2) taken as a reason not to grant such benefit to the petitioner because the respondents are themselves examining the matter. I, therefore, deem it proper to require the petitioners to make a fresh representation to the respondents who will decide the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt of it.” Taking note of the observations made in the judgment referred to supra, the present petition also stands disposed of and the petitioner will be at liberty to file a representation to the respondents and it is expected from the respondents to decide the same by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Decision may also be communicated to the petitioner, who if still feels aggrieved will be at liberty to avail the remedy under law. (Ajay Rastogi),J. VS Shekhawat/-p.2 8936cw06Aug04FnlDsps.doc