MC 1908/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Sikdar, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and Mr. BC Das, Se nior Advocate for the opposite party/respondent. It transpires from the additional-affidavit filed by the applicant that during t he pendency of the accompanying RSA No. 106/2009, the parties have amicably sett led their differences, which have since been recorded in a Sulenama/Compromised Deed dated 18.04.2011. A photo stat copy of this deed appended to the aforementi oned affidavit as Annexure A, reveals that the same was executed and signed by t he parties before a Notary. The fact of compromise and the terms and conditions of the Sulenama have been affirmed by the learned counsel for the parties. In the above view of the matter, as prayed for, RSA No. 106/2009 stands disposed as per the terms and conditions of the Sulenama/Compromise Deed dated 18.04.201 1. This Compromise Deed/Sulenama would form an integral part of the decree. The miscellaneous application stands disposed.