IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4786 of 2010 MOHAMAD JAWAID ALAM @ MD.JAVED ALAM Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 06.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Looted mobile is seized from petitioner’s shop is doubted its used by co-accused Rehana Begum and non-presence of this petitioner at the time of seizure of mobile nor his signature on seizure list. No doubt, the SIM existing in name of Rehana Begum but Police reached petitioner’s shop on her discloser only. None presence of petitioner at the time of seizure if effects the seizure is not the stage to consider the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)