IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21520 of 2009 1. YUGAL SAH 2. KARTIKK SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07.09.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are father-in-law and younger brother- in-law, have approached this court seeking bail under Sections 306 and 201 of Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that the allegations are against the petitioners. On account of torture perpetrated on her, she consumed poison. Learned counsel submits that there is evidence on record indicating that she was living separately with the husband. There is yet another set of witness who has gone on record stating that the victim on account of certain quarrel with the husband, consumed poison. Learned A.P.P. opposed prayer for bail. He referred to different paragraphs of the case diary wherein witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Petitioners are in custody since 9.4.2009. Having regard to the allegations contained in F.I.R. and the materials reflected from the case diary, this court, for the present, is not inclined to admit them to bail. Their prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. The submission advanced on behalf of the petitioners persuade this court to grant them liberty to renew prayer for bail after eight months from the date of receipt/communication of a 2 copy of this order if the trial in the mean while does not commence and concluded by examining all the prosecution witnesses on behalf of the petitioners. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )