IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23283 of 2010 MD.IDRISH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. There is general allegation against all the petitioners in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,448, 341,323, 324,379 and 504 of the I.P.C. Though there is specific allegation under Section 4 of the Witchcraft Act against Sanaullah. Though there is general allegation of assault against others but since petitioner nos.1 to 4 namely, Md. Idrish, Md. Mustak, Md. Jainuddin and Md. Mannan @ Md. Manan respectively are male members of the family, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos. 1 to 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 is rejected. However, learned court below will consider the fact that for the petty thing the occurrence took place and there is no serious injury and other have been granted anticipatory bail. The learned court below will consider 2 these things while considering the regular bail and if possible dispose off the same on the same day without being prejudiced by the present dismissal order of this court. So far petitioner nos. 5 and 6 are concerned, they are female members, let the petitioner nos. 5 and 6, namely, Salaha Khatoon and Samida Khatoon be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 91 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)