1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 232/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3671/2010 (Diposed of on 19.11.2010) The Executive Engineer and another. VERSUS Smt. Fulan w/o Bhimrao Deshpande. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders. Court’s or Judges orders. Shri S.G. Jagtap, Adv. for the appellants. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 8 th JUNE , 2011 . Heard Shri Jagtap, the learned counsel for the appellants. The judgment in appeal cannot be interfered with in the present letters patent appeal as the learned Single Judge on the facts and circumstances of the case had held that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Industrial Court and the grant of 50% back wages were not arbitrary or exorbitant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the leaned Single Judge had rightly refused to show indulgence in the matter in view of the fact that the petitioner had filed the writ petition after a lapse of six years. 2 The letters patent appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Hirekhan