IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16671 of 2008 MANGALESHWAR TIWARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 07/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. According to the informant, Dhanji Chaudhary had been to an orchard. Allegation is that the petitioner has shot him dead. Submission is that in course of investigation another version has come that the petitioner is not the assailant rather Kamleshwar Chaudhary has fired which proved fatal to Dhanji Chaudhary. Fard beyan is specific that it is the petitioner who has fired which proved fatal to Dhanji Chaudhary. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. amvin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)