1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO.411 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7193 OF 2003 Dyes & Chemical Workers Union .. Appellant V/s. M/s.Jaysynth Dyechem Limited .. Respondent. Mr.P.M. Patel for the appellant. Mr.K.K. Singhvi with Mr.Avinash K. Jalisatgi for the respondent. CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2005. DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2005. DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. 2. The appellant-workers union has challenged the order dated February 3, 2004 passed by the learned Single Judge. It may be noted here that already a letter patent appeal was filed against the said order by the respondent-company before the division bench and the division bench had disposed of the said letter patent appeal No.83 of 2004 by order dated April 12, 2004 wherein very slight modification was made with regard to the withdrawal of the money which was directed to be deposited by the respondent-company. 2 3. After having heard the parties for some time, the learned counsel Shri Patel on instructions from the Secretary of the Workers Union who is personally present in the court states that the transferred employees are ready and willing to report on work at Viramgam without prejudice to their rights and contentions. The learned counsel for the respondent Shri Singhvi states that upon their reporting for duty at Viramgam, the respondents will comply with the order of the learned single Judge dated February 3, 2004. 4. In view of the aforesaid statement, nothing further survives in this appeal, the appeal stands disposed of. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned single Judge is requested to dispose of the pending writ petition as expeditiously as possible. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)