IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6510 of 2008 Between: Penumatsa Appala Naidu S/o.Butchi Raju R/o.Gali Bheemavaram village Sabbavaram Post & Mandal Visakhapatnam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Tahsildar, Sabbavaram Post & Mandal Visakhapatnam District 3 The Mandal Development officer, Sabbavaram Post & Mandal, Visakhapatnam District 4 The Project Director, National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his patta land of Ac.3.77 cents in Sy.No.11 situated in Lagisettivanipalem (Lagisettipalem) village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District without acquiring the same either under Land Acquisition Act or under any other law as being illegal, unjust arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.E.V.BHAGIRATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Questioning the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his patta land in an extent of Ac.3.77 cents in Sy.No.11 situated in Lagisettivanipalem Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District without acquiring the same, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the writ petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. On 27.3.2008 the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has taken notice and sought time to get instructions in the matter. Today, the learned Government Pleader has produced before this Court the instructions obtained by him and submits that the land in question is classified as ‘Koyya Koneru Tank (Dharma Koneru)’ and that the same belongs to the Government as per SLR FMB and Village records. It is also stated that the petitioner has already filed WP No.8802 of 2007 before this Court questioning the action of the respondents and this Court dismissed the writ petition directing the petitioner to obtain necessary orders, if already such orders are passed and prefer an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer and without doing so, the petitioner again filed the present writ petition. Admittedly the petitioner has not preferred any appeal questioning the orders passed by the revenue officilas as directed by this Court. Therefore, the Tahsildar, Sabbavaram has taken a decision to erect the caution boards on the land on 26.8.2006 and reported the matter to the Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer vide proceedings dated 28..2..2006. Except the material produced in the earlier round of litigation, no other material is placed before this Court in this writ petition. Since the matter was already adjudicated by this Court in the earlier round of litigation, there is no reason to again entertain this writ petition. If the petitioner has any grievance with reference to the actions of the revenue officials, he is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum under law. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.09.06.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The Mandal Tahsildar, Sabbavaram Post & Mandal Visakhapatnam District 3 The Mandal Development officer, Sabbavaram Post & Mandal, Visakhapatnam District 4 The Project Director, National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, Visakhapatnam 5 2CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad 6 2CD copies