IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10039 of 2005 Between: 1 Y.Harikrishna, S/o.Suryanarayana Rao, R/o.Kuchipudi, Amrutalur Mandal, Guntur District. 2 Y.Kumaraswamy, S/o.Anjaiah, R/o.Kuchipudi, Amrutalur Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND Asst. Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in not furnishing to the petitioners the list of properties belonging to the Koganti Ramaswamy Trust, Pulichintalapalem village, vemuru Mandalam, Guntur District as noted in the property register maintained by the respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent of furnish the same forthwith to the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as the HOn'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.KRISHNA MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 10039 of 2005 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the inaction of the respondent-Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur in furnishing to the petitioners the list of properties belonging to the Koganti Ramaswamy Trust, Pulichintalapalem village, Vemuru Mandal, Guntur District is arbitrary and illegal. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it is stated that after filing the writ petition, the list of properties as sought by the petitioners have been furnished. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 16-12-2008 KLP