. . (K IN _T_HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. _?:f§*07 /ZQ_Q& Ravindra Dewangan S/cw Late Shri Vishwanath Dewangan, ag‘ecl abaut 22' ‘ years, R/o Village BhalmmGarh 1 Dewangan pala TahSII Bu apur Dmnct 1 Dantlewada C G ' EELS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary Forest Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur CC: of Frest o The Conservator ]agdalpur C G . The D.F.O., Division i, ' Dantewada, C.(3.. W WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 o_I:_[HE ‘ CONSTITUTION OT INDIA DETAILS OF THIS PETlTlO_N \ Q/ a. __ ‘Uniég w: In£im Prhxmmmz aaidmta‘ £6ini$ 3y 9f. For&&t, Raw ma. ‘ ' wE’y any q vw L. J 3r; f J , 1 *l $$dh$ Oi §llg¢ ’ I ’mmgh m “er mnaawvawr m tiamym 19min: .J'h Forest; XIAHC—22 WW Wm: févrarwg WWW 2A07/04 7i§g ma‘W UH Wm WW ma ‘ azwawm’ 21 42-2005 Shn P S Koshy, Dy Adv Genera! Heard. This case relates to compassionate appointment consequent-upon the death of an empioyee sewing in the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner the employee has occurred on or after 1—‘ in batch of cases bearing W.P. No.1322/2002 involving the same question orders have been rays that simiiar ordefs may be passed in this case passed by this Court on 20/1 2/2005 He p a950, Learned counsel for the State does of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision employees who died on or after 1/1 1/1 99 that time. by learned counsel appearing for the parties, in view of the submissions made without expressing any opinion on the me justice wiii be served if a direction is give concerned to eonsider and decide the ca prevaient at the time of death of the emr appointment orders wiii be issued as ear petitioner is also directed to render due cc any grievance still remains, the petitioner may avail the remedy available under the law including ming of the petition before this C With the aforesaid observations, tt Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who respondents for compliance; 7 for the Stated categorically stated that in this case, the death of 1-1 997 and not earlier‘ lt is further submitted that not dispute the above fact and state that the State to cpnsider the cases of dependants of those ‘7 strictly in accordance with the policy prevaient at Petitioner by Shn £H?1A.L& Lt $MJwJk/ Advocate. ‘its of the case, in the opinion of this Court, ends of n to the State ohChhattisgarh and the authorities lse of the petitioner in accordance with the policy )loyee concerned If the petitioner found eligible, ly as possible on or before 30'" April, 2006. The ‘operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if ourt. is petition stands disposed of. Will be obliged to communicate the order to the Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge A‘s pretrea- L