IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2514 OF 2009 Between: G. Samuel ..... Petitioner AND R. Vasantha Reddy .....Respondent HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2514 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the defendant G. Samuel against the order dated 30-03-2009 made in I.A. No.140 of 2009, a petition under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking to send the promissory note to the expert opinion, in O.S. No.744 of 2003 by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Revision Petitioner wanted to send the document, promissory note dated 04-08-2000, to the expert for his opinion. But, in view of the nature of the document and as can be seen from the xerox copy of the document, where it is clearly found that amount of “Rs.15,000/-“ is altered to “Rs.45,000/-“ and in view of the averments in the plaint, where the amount is mentioned as Rs.15,000/-, the trial Court can decide the matter even without sending the document to expert for his opinion. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff contends that in the promissory note in question, in words it is clearly written as ‘rupees forty five thousand only’, as such, the amount due under the promissory note is to be taken as Rs.45,000/- only. Even this question can also be take into consideration by the trial Court while deciding the suit. 5. In the circumstances, there is absolutely no necessity of sending the promissory note in question to the expert for his opinion, since, as already observed, even to naked eye, it is clearly evident that there is alteration in the amount portion from “Rs.15,000/-“ to “Rs.45,000/-“, which can be taken into consideration by the trial Court while deciding the suit. Therefore, I see no merits to entertain this revision. It is to be noted that the trial Court shall not treat that there is any finding in this revision with regard to the promissory note and the trial Court shall independently decide that question. 6. For the aforesaid reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. No order as to costs. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J August 25, 2009. NOTE: Furnish C.C. of the order within two (2) days. (B/O) PV