1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4000 OF 2009 Suresh s/o Namdeo Todkar, R/o-Manikdoundi, Tq-Pathardi, Dist-Ahmednagar. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.K.D. Bade Patil Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri.S.D.Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner prays for directions to the Respondent No.3 Management on assurance of 2 appointment which, according to the Petitioner, was given to him. The Petitioner contends that he was in service with the Respondent No.3 Management till 2001. Thereafter he was discontinued, but on behalf of the Management, assurance was given that no sooner vacancy arises, the Petitioner would be appointed. 3. It is contended on behalf of the Respondent No.3 Management that advertisement was issued. The Petitioner participated in the selection process but was not selected. 4. In the facts of the case, the Petitioner does not have any legal right to claim the reliefs as prayed for in this Petition. In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction, the Petition cannot be entertained. The Writ Petition is dismissed. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JULY10/wp4000.09