IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2010 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14828 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- PRINCE L.PANICKER, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.K.LUKOSE PANICKER, PRINCY BHAVAN, PERUPUZHA, ELAMPALLOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, SPECIAL GRADE KUNDARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. OMANAKUMARAN, PRESIDENT, KUNDARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. RAJENDRAN, VICE PRESIDENT, KUNDARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUNDARA, KOLLAM. 6. S.RADHAKRISHNA, THAMPI, SREEVALLABHA, HOSPITAL JUNCTION, KUNDARA P.O., KOLLAM 691 501. 7. P.GEORGEKUTTY, PADINJATTEDATHU VEEDU, NEAR TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, KUNDARA P.O., KOLLAM 691 501. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.14828/2010-C ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 20th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P7 show cause notice issued by the first respondent-Panchayat to stop the construction of his building and to explain the reasons for making the constructions without obtaining building permit. 2. Ext.P8 is the reply given by the petitioner to Ext.P7 show cause notice. It is explained therein that he was orally permitted to have the constructions and the constructions have been made in accordance with the Building Rules. Accordingly, the petitioner has sought for an order to regularise the construction after collecting compound fee from him. 3. It is upto the first respondent-Panchayat to take a decision on Ext.P7 after considering Ext.P8 reply. There will be a direction to the first respondent to consider the reply given by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the Rules. If the order is adverse to the petitioner, it is open to him to challenge it in an appropriate forum. The first respondent-Panchayat will take a decision expeditiously. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms