1 fca.24-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2011 Vikram Rajendra Gandhi ..Appellant. Vs. Dimple Vikram Gandhi ..Respondent. ---- Mr. N.D. Pote i/b Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar, for the Appellant. Mr. Vikas Mali, for the Respondent. ------- CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 17, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal was referred for mediation. The Mediator has sent a report with his covering letter dated 19.9.2011 along with consent terms duly signed by the parties. The Mediator's report and the consent terms are taken on record, and marked 'X' and 'X-1' for identification. 2 fca.24-2011 3. Before the Family Court, the divorce was obtained by the parties by filing consent terms and a decree of divorce to that effect was also passed by the Family Court. The Family Court, however, proceeded to hear the petition filed by the respondent-wife for maintenance and it was ultimately decreed. The decree of Family Court in respect of the maintenance is under challenge in the present appeal. The appeal was, as aforementioned, was referred for mediation and before the Mediator the parties arrived at an amicable settlement. The settlement was recorded by the Mediator in the form of consent terms. The consent terms were also signed by the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have acted upon the consent terms recorded by the Mediator. Their statements are accepted. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant-husband has no objection for allowing the respondent-wife to withdraw the amount that has been deposited by the appellant-husband in pursuance of the consent terms. The respondent-wife is allowed to withdraw the amount as mentioned in the consent terms(X-1). 3 fca.24-2011 6. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. (M.L.TAHALIYANI,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)