1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3629 OF 2005. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3629 OF 2005. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3629 OF 2005. IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.710 OF 2002. FIRST APPEAL NO.710 OF 2002. FIRST APPEAL NO.710 OF 2002. Himatsingh Pandurang Patil : Appellants. versus Jaisingh Pandurang Patil : Respondent. Mr.Prabhawalkar with Mr.D.S.Sawant for the appellant. Ms.Smita Mane i/by P.B.Shah for the respodnent CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 26th August 2005. DATED : 26th August 2005. DATED : 26th August 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard advocate for the appellant who has filed this application restraining the respondent from creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. 2 2 2 2. The application is strongly opposed by the respondent. My attention was drawn to the order of this Court dated 9.4.2003. That order was passed against the appellant. He filed SLP. That was rejected. Then went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court also refused to interfere with. The order dated 9.4.2003 is absolutely clearly and no protection can be given to the appellant. The application is dismissed. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]