IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3065 of 2011 BABLU MANDAL son of Ramjee Mandal------- petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 09.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. Subsequently, the petitioner’s name sprang up as one of the accomplices. In 164 Cr.P.C., statement of the witnesses, they did not name the petitioner, rather, they levelled the accusation against the informant himself. Subsequently, it is submitted that the informant has made accusation. Though learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner was accompanying the informant. Considering the circumstantial nature of accusation, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a 2 period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 257/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)