1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. C.A.W. No. 1263/2011 in WRIT PETITION NO.6458/2005 (Decided) ( Shripat Shankarrao Bawankar .vs. State of Mah. And ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, AGP for Respondents 1,3,4 and 5. .......... CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 07, 2011 The grievance in disposed of petition is till date no decision has been taken though on 15.12.2006 the statement was made before this Court that such decision in accordance with law would be taken within a period of eight weeks. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner there is no decision as yet on proposal forwarded by respondent no.2- Zilla Parishad. The learned AGP on the other hand invites attention to the order dated 30.9.2008 passed in Contempt Petition No. 173/2007 to point out that such decision taken vide communication dated 17.1.2008 has already been brought on record. Perusal of the said order in Contempt Petition No. 173/2007 reveals that as per the communication dated 17.1.2008 the Government of Maharashtra has 2 found it not possible to start any P.H.C. at village of the petitioner and it was further stated that the issue of opening of the same can be looked into in future development plan. In this situation, we find civil application filed in disposed of matter a misconceived. The petitioner is at liberty to take such steps as are open to him in the matter. Present civil application disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE halwai