SSGU CWSSW OF CaBHATTIBGARH, SVLASrVS. W.P. (s»a«».4«;a»/aoo7 VB'n'SIOSESSt. Ram Narayaa Sfariwas, s/o Late Shri Nekrmn Stuivas, aged 47 years, Occupation Servfce, Presenfty posted as Kitwari m Patwari HaBsa No. 106-B, Bsdpur, Tehsil: Raipur, R/o Shanti Vihar Colony, Qwsganjya, Kaipin- (C.G^ Wersua SESVOSSaSSCSS 1. State of Cfafaattisgaili Ttu-ough Secretary, Depm-tmeat ofRevenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mairttateya, Raipur (C.G)(C.G.) 2. GonuiatesloiiBT, Laiid Reeerds, State ofChhattisgarb, RaipiEr (C.G) 3. The CoUector, Raipur, Distt. feupur(C.G) 4. The Sub-Divisional Offlicer, Revenue, upur (C.G) 5. JiteiidraSixiha,s/oNotkaown, Occupation-Service, presentty workmgas Pataarlia Pattran ; Hattsa No.40, Gtohrapadar, Sub- Tahsil Maiapur (iacorrw^ mentiQned in tfae oidwimpaycKd as Manpur) Raiptu? (C.G) WRIT HBTreiOII OTIXXBRAR.TICa %»OrTBaB COIBTmrTKMKMP IHIttA Appearance: Shri Raje®»Shrivastava, Counsel far tte petitionCT. Sfari Yashwant Sixigh, Govfc Advocate, for the Stete on advance copy. ORALORDBai (08.08.2007) suna KOMAR SIBHA. j. Heard on admissi&n. By ttais writ petition, actiaUa^e is niade to the oidec oftraiMEa- dated 29.6.2007 whereby the petiticaier, who is workmg on tfae post af Patwari, taas been traxisferred fi-om Patmari Halto No. 106B Raipur to W.P. t 110.4620/2007 t! 1 (i.- Patwari Halka No. 14, Gariaband, Distt. Ra^>'ur, on admnuslrative grounds. Leamed counselfor the petitioner ai^ues tfaatfh.e petitioaer is a victim of fi^quent traasfers. He submits fhat on 17.8.2004, (he petitioner was transferred fix>m Baloda Bazar to TUda, ttiereafter again on 21.7.2006 he was traxisferred from TiMa to Iteipur and now wiffain a period of less ttaan one year i.e., on 29.6.2007, he has been traasferred fi-om Raipiir to Gariaband. Admittedty, the petitk>ner was subjected to 3 transfers m belween 17.8.2004 and 29.6.2007 ie., wifhin a pCTlod of 3 years. The petitioner is a low paidemptoyee, therefore, considering fhe &cts aiad circumstances oftfais case, in (he optaionoffhis Court, ends ofjustice would be served if the petitioner is directed tp ffle a representatioa before the conceroed aufhority aDd the concemed authorfly is dicected to dispose of the same wtthin the stq>iilated pedod g?-aated by tib Court. Accordu^ly, this petitfon fe disposed of with. a direction ttaat fhe petitioner, if so advised, may flte a detailed representatfon before tbe concemed aufhority wifhm. 15 days tom today atong-with a copy of this order and copy ofwrit petition and if such a repiesentatioa is fited, fhe concenied authority sball dispose of the saae as eady as possible preferably within a period of 2 monfhs fi-om the date of submission of representation, considermg ttoe ground (hat petitioiiCT was subjected to 3 transfers'within a period ofless than 3 years. It is furfher directed fhat in ttie meanwtate, fhe petitionCT shaU not be reUeved from his present plaee of postmg and staall be allowed to contmue there. With the above direction/obseivations, tials petitioa staiids fiiialfy disposed of. Sdf- C.c. as per rules. - sunil Kumar Sinha .ludge