IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14892 of 2011 MUKESH KUMAR @ TUNNA SINGH @ TUNU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 135 and 136 of the Electricity Act. The accusation against the petitioner is that he was a consumer under the agriculture connection whereas he was running flour Mills from 5 H.P. motor. It is also alleged that the petitioner caused loss of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the Electricity Board. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has agriculture connection in his house and no motor was seized and the informant has miscalculated the charges at commercial rate. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner deposit Rs. 50,000/- before the learned court below which will be invested in some fixed deposit schemes which will be subject to result of 2 the case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. `127 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Barh, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The bail bonds of the petitioner will be provisionally accepted till the aforesaid amount will be deposited before the learned court below. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)