:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4822 OF 2003 Shri Abasaheb Nanasaheb Jadhav ...Petitioner V/s Madha Taluka Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Solapur & Ors ...Respondents. --- Mr. A.V. Anturkar with Mr Tanaji for the petitioner. Mr. S.A. Sawant for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. V.A. Sonpal, AGP for respondent No.3. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.M. V.M. V.M. KANADE, JJ. KANADE, JJ. KANADE, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 13th July, 2006 : 13th July, 2006 : 13th July, 2006 P.C.: . In view of the fact that the petitioner has an adequate alternative remedy under section 57 of the Maharashtra University Act, 1994, leaving that remedy open to the petitioner, Petition is disposed of. If such grievance is made, it be decided as early as possible in six months. Petition is accordingly disposed of. (V.G.PALSHIKAR, (V.G.PALSHIKAR, (V.G.PALSHIKAR, J.) J.) J.) (V.M. (V.M. (V.M. KANADE, J.) KANADE, J.) KANADE, J.)