IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No.14225 of 2008 Date of decision : December 14, 2011 Shri Jagan Nath son of Shri Devi Saran, resident of village Talinu, P.O. and Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, Presently working as Beldar in I & PH Sub Division, Karsog. …Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (I & PH) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2. 2. The Engineer-in-Chief (I&PH), Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. 3. The Executive Engineer, I & PH Division, Karsog, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Question involved in the present writ petition has been answered by a Division Bench of this court in CWP No.2735 of 2010, titled as Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, and 38 other CWPs, vide judgment dated 28th July, 2010. However, it is pointed out by learned Assistant Advocate General that the aforesaid judgment, dated 28th July, 2010, of this Court, having been assailed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court, has been stayed. It is also stated by the learned Assistant Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? CWP(T) No.14225/2008 …2… Advocate General that the Division Bench, which delivered the judgment dated 28th July, 2010, is allowing similar matters, in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 28th July, 2010, subject to the final outcome of the matter, pending in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of, in terms of the aforesaid judgment, dated 28th July, 2010, passed in CWP No.2735 of 2010 (Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others) and 38 other connected matters, and it is ordered that the petitioner shall also be entitled to the same relief, as granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid judgment, subject to the final outcome of the appeal filed against the aforesaid judgment, dated 28th July, 2010, in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. December 14, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J