IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 664 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 664 OF 2003 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 664 OF 2003 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 436 OF 2003 SECOND APPEAL NO. 436 OF 2003 SECOND APPEAL NO. 436 OF 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Smeeta Gaidhani holding for Mr. S.V. Gavand for the applicants. Ms. Gauri Godse for the Resp.Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 23RD SEPT., 2005 DATED: 23RD SEPT., 2005 DATED: 23RD SEPT., 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for both parties. Perused the record. 2. By order dated 3.7.2003 while Rule was issued, ad-interim relief to maintain status-quo was granted. The appeal is already admitted. Taking into account the facts and circumstances in the dispute, there is no reason why the status-quo should not be continued. Hence, the application is made absolute with direction that the parties to maintain status-quo with regard to the suit property pending appeal. With this direction, the application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. .....