IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15247 of 2011 Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Paswan & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 28.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 363, 366A, 376 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation was of enticing away the minor daughter of the informant. In 164 Cr. P. C. statement the victim girl has stated that she went to the house of her friend and stayed there for three days where she came across with Mukesh. The accusation was found false which led to submission of final form but subsequently on protest cognizance has been taken. The statement has been made in paragraph no.7 that during investigation the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, Mukesh 2 Kumar @ Mukesh Paswan, Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Paswan, Rajesh Safi and Shambhu Safi, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case C 314 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)