1 lpa385-11.odt FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.385/11 .... Shri Pratap Rodge,Adv.for appellant. Shri B.B.Yenge,Adv.for Respondents. .... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & T.V.NALAWADE,JJ. DATE : 21/12/2011. 1] Considering the purport behind legislating proviisons of Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act and the facts of the case, the learned Single Judge reached conclusion that the appellant shall deposit the amount within a period of six weeks from 18/11/2011. 2] Shri Rodge, learned 2 lpa385-11.odt counsel submits that the complaint filed by the respondent itself was not maintainable and the appellant University was not responsible to pay the emoluments of the respondents. Therefore, the appellant is not entitled to pay the amount in the light of order passed u/s 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act. 3] Shri Yenge, learned counsel for respondents submits that considering the purport behind legislating proviisons of Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, and in the facts of the case, the view adopted by learned Single Judge cannot be termed to be patently erroneous. 4] We do not find any error in the view adopted by the learned Single Judge. No interference is warranted in this Letters Patent Appeal. The Appeal is dismissed. 3 lpa385-11.odt 5] In view of dismissal of Appeal, Civil Application No. 14209/11 does not survive and the same is disposed of. (T.V.NALAWADE,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) umg/lpa385-11