IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2008 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8881 of 2008(G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ RADHA LAKSHMANAN, W/O. LAKSHMANAN, 7/12 "SAI NIVAS", CHENGAZHIKALAM, PATTANCHERRY P.O PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678532. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (KERALA & LAKSHADWEEP), PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM. 2. V. SUKUMARAN NAIR, S/O. SATHI DEVI AMMA, VAZHUTHANASSERY HOUSE, THENKURISSI AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT 3. JAINALAVUDHEEN, S/O. SHRI NOORMUHAMMED, EANICKAL HOUSE, KARUVANNUTHARA, KODUVAYOOR P.O., PALAKKAD. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, KINASSERY VILLAGE, PALAKKAD TALUK. R1 BY ADV. SRI. P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR- ASST.S.G THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== W.P.(C)No.8881 of 2008 ================================== Dated this the 24th day of March, 2008. JUDGMENT I have gone through the records in O.A.No.32 of 2001 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal. In so far as the recovery proceedings are concerned, the file of the recovery officer excludes every allegation thrown in the writ petition against the office of the recovery officer as also the Tribunal. It is unfortunate that such statements are made by the petitioner without any responsibility and without first satisfying herself of the consequences of making frivolous allegations. The file of the recovery officer and the Tribunal is returned to the Central Government counsel. 2. The petitioner is a third party. She claims that she is one of the legal representatives of the transferee of an item of property that is WPC8881/2008 -:2:- offered as a security in one of the loans. I do not venture to state anything on the quality of the claim but even if the petitioner has a claim, it is for her to work out the remedies before the appropriate forum. This writ petition is hence closed directing that if the petitioner makes any appropriate application, in accordance with law for certified copy of the proceedings, that shall be issued in accordance with law. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. sl.