1 Cri.WP No.550/2010 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.550/2010. ( Pitambar Dhanraj Patil Vs. Banubai w/o Pitambar Patil and Anr. ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. SI Nandode, Adv. for Petitioner; Mr. PP More, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 23 rd JUNE, 2011. ... 1) Heard finally. 2) At the advanced age of the couple, the wife was required to knock for minimum expectation of her life to maintain herself. The Courts, considering the needs to be adhered to by the wife, reached to a finding to award Rs.800/- monthly maintenance. 3) The husband is a responsible Village Officer - Police Patil, earns sufficient income owing to agricultural yields, the couple is blessed with married female daughters, still the bickering continued owing to inter-se controversies. The wife alleged, the husband has developed illicit relations with named lady. The wife resides in the said village. 4) The grievance of the learned Counsel for the husband that the learned revisional 2 Cri.WP No.550/2010 Court did not discuss the evidence properly, is not correct. It is individual's skill as to how one has to evaluate the evidence and particularly when it is a revision. The scope of revision is quite limited, where verbose inquiry as to the events was not contemplated. 5) Considering these aspects, I do not see any error on the part of even the revisional court in rejecting the plea of husband. 6) Criminal writ petition lacks merit, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/