IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.10068 of 2010 BINAY SINGH @ PAPPU SINGH son of late Mahendra Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 27.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 20.11.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25419 of 2009, since there was material against the petitioner that he was one of the persons, who was demanding Rangdari from the deceased, and on account of non- payment of the same has committed his murder. This fact has been stated by the informant and one Arun Kumar Gupta, who have been examined during trial but they do not support this fact. The next witness Rajani Gupta, the wife of the deceased is not an eye witness to the occurrence. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Fast Track Court No. 3, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with S. T. No.317 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter - 2 - the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)