IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.289 of 2011 RAMJEE SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 04.04.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law is aggrieved by the order dated 04.08.2010 passed on Cr. Appeal No.13/10/03/10 by 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Aurangabad who agreeing with the view taken by the J.J. Board refused the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Petitioner is facing charge punishable under sections 302 and 379/34 IPC, vide Deo P.S. Case No. 27/09. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that going by prosecution he is not the main assailant. Other accuseds have been released on bail. His prayer for bail was rejected when he was not declared juvenile on 15.04.2010 with an observation that he may renew prayer for bail after completion of one year. It is submitted that father of the petitioner is ready and willing to take responsibility of the petitioner if released on bail. It is further submitted that earlier the petitioner was in jail custody, but subsequently he is lodged in remand home since 15.04.2010. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile 2 Justice Board, Aurangabad in G.R.No. 358/09, Tr. No. 407/10 corresponding to Deo P.S. Case No. 27/09 subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his father/uncle. It is shall be duty of the father to monitor the conduct and behaviour of the petitioner and produce him at the trial as and when required. In case of default in such appearance the trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond of secure his arrest in accordance with law. During subsistence of the present privilege if it is found that he is involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation of the same. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )