... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2006 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.82 OF 2005 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) 21242 OF 2005 Shri Dattatraya Bhagwant Waghere ...Applicant Vs. Shri Gorakh Ukhaji Disle & Ors. ...Respondents Shri Girish Badige for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the counsel appearing for the Applicant. Perused the Application. Although the explanation offered cannot be accepted, however in the interest of justice as the litigant should not be made to suffer on account of default on the part of the Advocate. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 8(i) and 8(ii). In other words, as this Application is allowed, Applicant is granted further four weeks time from today to comply with the requirement under the order dated 16th January, 2006, if already not complied. Office to examine this position. If steps have been taken by the Petitioner, matter be proceeded ... 2 ... further. This indulgence is shown on Advocate for the Applicant paying costs personally to the High Court Legal Services Authority quantified to Rs.750/- within one week from today failing which Application will stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE