[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.835 OF 2006 IN APPLICATION NO.4168 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO. OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant [Ori.Complainant] Vs. Ramkeval Rajkumar Saroj alias Rakesh Pradipsingh Rajput and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.P.S.Hingorani APP for State .... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : ARPIL 09, 2008 : ARPIL 09, 2008 : ARPIL 09, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned APP for the Applicant-State. The Applicant-State of Maharashtra has preferred this Criminal Application No.4168 of 2006 for leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquitted of the Respondents for the offences punishable under Section 177 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 read with Section 37(1) of the Bombay Police Act and Section 3(1)(ii) of MCOC Act. [-2-] The present application for condonation of delay came to be preferred as there is delay of 142 days caused in filing the application for leave to file appeal. We find that delay has not been satisfactorily explained. Hence, we are not inclined to condone the delay. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [F.I.REBELLO, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [F.I.REBELLO, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [F.I.REBELLO, J.]