IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-4923 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 21.02.2011 Vishal Chhiber .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the dictum of Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and others, reported in 2011(1) RCR (Criminal) 127, anticipatory bail should not be granted for the limited period. However, anticipatory bail once granted should be continued during the trial. Learned counsel has further stated that learned Sessions Judge has granted anticipatory bail only for three months in violation of dictum of Hon'ble Apex Court, hence, permission may be granted to him to move an application before learned Sessions Judge to grant anticipatory bail during the investigation/trial. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (ALOK SINGH) 21.02.2011 JUDGE reena