ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.407 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.407 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.407 OF 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Y.A.Sakhare i/by Ms. Varsha Palav for the Appellants. Mr.Sachin Chavan i/by Mr.Sanjiv Sawant for Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 4th June, 2008 : 4th June, 2008 : 4th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . On 29th April, 2008, this Court has adjourned the matter to take instructions, in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 and 2 that pursuant to the concurrent finding in favour of Respondent-Plaintiff and as there was no stay granted by the Court. The decree in question has already been executed. 2. In the result, the Appellants got the possession of the ( 2 ) premises in question of which he was claiming tenancy right. Without going further into the merit of the matter, the present Second Appeal which is against the concurrent findings of facts given by the Courts below need no interference. There is no legality or perversity apart from the above facts. 3. The Second Appeal is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous, however with liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]