HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAD AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 630 of 2008 Vinit Panwar. ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ……….. Respondents Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition field by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 02.11.2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit field by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 08.08.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 12.02.2009 V.K.