(1) SA. 676.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 676 OF 2007 Sayyed Rasool S/o Sayyed Nizam .. Appellant Versus Sheikh Hanif S/o Sheikh Ambji and ors. .. Respondents Mr. B.S. Kudale, Advocate for the appellant Mr. A.G. Dalal, Advocate h/f. Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 5 None present for Respondent no.4 though served CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2009 P.C.:- 1] Heard. Perused the judgment of both the lower Courts. There is no substantial question of law involved in the second appeal. The appeal is filed against the concurrent findings of the two lower Courts. The Courts below dis-believed the case of the appellant that he did not mean to sell his property to the respondent no.4, and that it was a transaction of mortgage. Admittedly, the document between the appellant and the respondent no.4 was a registered sale deed, there was no whisper in it that it was a mortgage. (2) SA. 676.2007 2] The Courts below rightly rejected the appellant’s attempt to prove the oral agreement contrary to the documents of sale and so, the appeal cannot be admitted. 3] The Second Appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp