IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10183 of 2009 Date of decision : 03.08.2010 Harmesh Chander .....Petitioner VERSUS Guru Nanak Dev University and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The justification given in the reply is that the petitioner is wanting to continue with the studies after 21 years gap. The approach adopted by the University does not suffer from any unfairness and it is on the basis of ordinance promulgated by the University. No case for interference, therefore, is made out. Dismissed. August 03, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE