IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2652 OF 2004. WRIT PETITION NO.2652 OF 2004. WRIT PETITION NO.2652 OF 2004. Sakharam D. Patil & Ors. ..Petitioner versus Jaysing G. Gurav ..Respondent. Mr.P.D.Dalvi for the petitioner Mr.M.r.Suryavanshi for the Respondent Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 13th Feb., 2006 Dated : 13th Feb., 2006 Dated : 13th Feb., 2006 P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. 2. As plaintiff’s application for temporary injunction was rejected by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Kolhapur, the plaintiff has filed the present petition. 3. From the perusal of the impugned order it is very clear that the 3rd Additional District Judge has properly appreciated the material on record and has rightly held that plaintiff has made out prima facie case for granting temporary injunction as prayed. There is no error of law in the order passed by the Additional District Judge. Moreover, the said temporary injunction is in operation for last about two and half years. Hence, there is no substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. 4. It is made clear that the observations in this order should not influence the trial court while disposing the suit on merits. (S.R.Sathe, J.)