1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.94/2010. (The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Vs. Maruti Namdeo Avhad and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.VD Rakh, AGP for Appellant; ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 15 th February, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.Rakh,learned AGP, extensively. 2) The State feels aggrieved by the Award of the Reference Court in LAR No. 96/1987, whereby the learned Reference Court made enhancement from the amount of Rs.30,109/-, awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, to Rs. 60,750/-, making a difference of Rs. 30,641/-. 3) Having gone through the order under challenge, I find, there is no exorbitant exercise of discretion by the learned Judge while passing the Award under challenge. The learned Judge was 2 equipped with the sale instances and the earlier Land Reference being LAR No. 177/1987. 4) Consequently, I do not find any error warranting interference in the Award under challenge. 5) The appeal dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/fa94.10