HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1638 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: The appeal is filed by the claimant against the order in M.V.O.P.No.821 of 1999 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur, dismissing the claim for compensation for the injuries received in a motor accident. 2. The claim of the petitioner was that on 04.05.1999 when she along with her family members were returning in the jeep bearing No.AP 04 B 4596 the driver of the jeep drove it in a rash and negligent manner and dashed to an electric pole, as a result of which, she suffered multiple injuries and she was treated in the hospital. The learned Tribunal found that the petitioner received injuries in the motor accident, due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the jeep. But, however, as the petitioner has failed to produce necessary evidence with regard to disability or hospitalisation or medical expenses, the claim was dismissed. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the documents were filed in the lower Court, but the application to receive the documents was returned and the injury certificate was filed before the lower Court. The copy of said application is shown to the Court now and as per the above certificate, the petitioner suffered three injuries and out of them one is grievous that is evidently the crush injury said to have been received by her. Evidently, for the injuries received by the petitioner under found no fault liability, a sum of Rs.25,000/- was granted as compensation. Since there is no further proof of any disability or medical expenses, the learned Judge has rightly rejected the claim. Even the documents sought to be filed at latter stage does not show the particulars of the medical expenses or disability. 4. Therefore, in view of the above circumstances, the order of the lower Tribunal does not call for any interference since except proof of injuries, for which already compensation has granted there is no other material with regard to any disability or medical expenses. Since the matter pertains to the year, 1999, I do not find any reason to remand the case by giving further opportunity as pleaded by the petitioner. Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs. _________________________ N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO, J Date: 04.08.2011 INL