RESPONDENTS (D §§wg§i~3 Egmrw BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR :1. / Ramlal Patel, S/o. Shri Laxman Patel, aged about 65 years, R/o. Village Kotml, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) PER ETITION w.P s No. £ 2009 VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Setretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2./ Upper General Secretary, Administration Department, (Pension Committee), D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Accountant General, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad» Panchayat Mainpot, District Sarguja (C.G.) 3. 4. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA. 1. PARTIFI” AD€ §\E Tu: nc-r‘r-n-uu‘n.—J_ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri! J. Present:- ShriV. K. Tekam, counselforthe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Sumesh Bajaj. counsel for respondents No.4 & 5. CRAL DRDER (Passed on this 14‘" day of September, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. (2) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.4 & 5 submits that the relief sought for in this case by the petitioner has already been satistied except interest on the payment of leave encashment for the period from year 2002 to 2008, as the same is in the process of determination and shall be paid at the earliest. (3) ln View of foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. (4) Accordingiyythe writ petition is disposed of. rt- Gowri WRIT PETITION (SI NG. 31 81I20a9 PETITIONER Ramial Patel Versus RESPONDENTS State of C.G. and others