IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4484 of 2009 MOJIBUR RAHMAN W i t h Cr.Misc. No.8875 of 2009 LAXMAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 19/05/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are the Panchayat Secretary and the Mukhiya respectively apprehending arrest in a police case under Sections- 406, 409, 467, 468, 469 and 471 of I.P.C. The allegatgions are of defalcation, embezzlement in the Indira Awas Yozna disbursement. The submission is of false implication when the Mukhiya alleges that he has no role to play in the matter of “Indra Awas Yojna”. Learned counsel for the State, from the case diary, submits that in an administrative enquiry conducted by the Assistant Collector the Panchayat Secretary has acknowledged his own involvement in the matter. Learned counsel for the Panchayat Secretary before this Court submits that the Mukhiya was acting in tandem with him together. Considering that the admission made by the 2 Panchayat Secretary is not before the police but before an administrative authority when he alleges that the Mukhiya was in tandem with him, this Court is satisfied that both do not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. The applications are rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)