1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7215/2009 Lokesh Kumar Atreya vs RPSC DATE OF ORDER: 22.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Mahaveer Bisnoi, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is challenging the process of scaling adopted by the RPSC in the process of appointment to the post of RAS and particularly, RAS Preliminary Examination. The petitioner in the writ petition could not give material particulars about the process of scaling so as to assail the scaling process on any of the grounds. It appears that the petitioner has approached this Court without obtaining any factual basis how the scaling was done and what was the criteria adopted for scaling. Therefore, unless the petitioner knows it, he cannot have any grievance. The writ petition In view of the above, the petitioner may first approach the RPSC for getting the information regarding criteria adopted for scaling and then he may have grievance. Thus the writ petition of the petitioner which has been preferred without serving the notice for demand of justice and seeking information from the 2 RPSC is not entertained at this stage. In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. However, the petitioner is free to challenge the criteria adopted by the RPSC in case any case is made out after obtaining the requisite information. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-