1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3458 OF 2007 [Anil Jaydevlal Barot. Vs. State of Maharashtra.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.R.R.Mahagaonkar, Adv. appointed for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DATED : DATED : JANUARY 18, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Advocate appointed for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has preferred this application through jail for expeditious hearing of the Special Case No.25 of 2005. The said case is under the MCOC Act. 3. The learned APP states that the case has been assigned to the Fast 2 Track Court. In view of this statement, at this stage, I do not think it necessary to pass an order expediting the trial. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for expeditious trial in case the trial does not commence by 30th July, 2008. 4. Application is disposed of accordingly. . Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in Thane Central Prison. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]