003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT Va.iS' Hs-iins* BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. ^^, 7200^ HON'BLE S.B. SERVICE MATTER PETITIONER < ^ :^-^Dr.N.S. Suryanarayana /A agsd about 50 years, >S/o. Late N.C.H. Shastri ...••'' '../'\£i'y;"' .-••'" Assistant Professor of Physics Govt. P.G. Autonomous College (Govt. Arts & Science College Durg) R/o. 2/B, Street-14, Hospital Sector Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS y^y ^^^^ •<?n~ ^'^. .^J^w \b^.^ G •9 ov RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary \0'i. - . ...... ^. '.'.. ,b Department of Higher Educatipn ^ -..„-. •: Mantralaya D.K.S., Bhawan ,1^aipur ^."" ( C.G.) 2. Deputy Secretary Department of Higher Education D.K.S., Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Principal, Govt. P.G. Autonomous College Durg (Govt.Arts and Science College Durg (C.G.)) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTLON QF INDIA 040 Sf- GRPRJ—FS/3' 's^r '«i-4!ci^i, ffiil'M'iio, Isi<rii'yy,< ^ ^ Zcob 3iI^T'ti5I%' (^y^f) airafepNwwff ^'fe^ ^SR?R Shri N.K. Chatterjee, co^insei forthe petttioner. Shri G.K. Berjwal, Dy. ^dvocate General and Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the Stat^. Heard. By this petjtton under 4rticie 226/227 of the Constltutton or' tndia, the petitioner is CilaiienginA the transfer order dated 10-2-2006 (Annexure-P/1), by whicti 'ne t-^s faeen transferred from Government P.G. Autonomous Arts and Scienci^ Coiieae, Dura to Governrnent Coileoe, osrtod and in contravention sunmits ffl.at son ot ttii the transfer the education of tt Kurud, DiStrict Dhamtari, The ftetitioner is work-lna as Assistant Professor. The contentfon is tnat the franfefer order has been issued during the ban of the fransfer poSicy. Learned counsel •s .'l» er is stuaying in ciass 11"' and because o? 'e son of the petitjoner wouid be adverseiv' affected. It submitteo' that tri* v»ife of tne peutioner Is suffering ftom Kidnsy probiem anu aettinfl tr^ati''nent from Sector-S Hosptei, Shilai. It is submitteci ffiat tfte petittoner isl Cooniinator uf the Indira Gandhi Nationai Op©n Urilv^rSfTy Studiss C^ntf^ ai Dury, thor^for^, Withoot pffOf consultstion. he csnuot be trsn^ferr^d. Lsarried counsei for th^ State su&mits triat ilie Detitiorief niav' be dit'ficteu to suumit represfint^tion before ttie competent auu lority of respondents, wrijch shail be cftnsidered anct decided on its own merits. .Havfng considerefi and witi'iou't expressino anv opinjon on ihe riients of tiie case ui6 pefltioner is uifected to mak'e a detaiisd representation raisinu his grieS/ances beftsre the comoetent auffioritv of resBondents witfiin a periodjof 15 days from today and on such 041 3^^1'y|ri'4; ®fllwi(o,fadiyy ^ \^^ Z&afc 3?1^[ T5RT (Tpf^^) -I-' representation being fiied, th^ competent autl-ioriry'of the respondents snail decide the same on its cjwn rnerits in accordance with law as earjy as possibte prefera-bly within |a period of two months from the date of rsmains, the petitionsr iTiay ava| receipt of representation. St ^ rnade clear that if any grievance stiii the remedy avaiiabie under the !aw. LQSFHQd COUTiSSi fOF tlS D^tltiQHsf siiurriits that 1111 dsts th© petitioner has not bcen reiieved. He oravs fot" urant of interim r6iief. |n view of the above, it js directed that the petltioner be ailowed to eontiny.c, tiii ttie repressntation Is decideu. ^'vVith tile aforesaiu obserl Cofisequaritly, h4.(W.).Pj ^'attuns, ti'-iis petition srands disposed of. L>en«ieacopy as per ruigs. No.704/2006 afso stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge GRFRJ—FS/350—!2/2000—50,0 ^° '°? ^•/