IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 1st day of November, 2011 First Bail Application No. 929 of 2011 Criminal Side Vinod Singh S/o Vijay Singh R/o Village Matiyal (Balli) Patti Ajmer Wall 2 Tehsil Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal ……...Applicant ( in Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …..….Opposite Party Arising out of case crime no. 3 of 2011 Under Section: 302/394 IPC Patti Ajmer Wall-II Tehsil-Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal -________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Applicant- Vinod Singh who is in jail in connection with crime no. 3 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 302/394 IPC, Patti Ajmer Wall -II, Tehsil Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal, has sought his release on bail. -2- Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. There is no recovery from the applicant. Applicant has no criminal history. Co-accused Vijay Singh with similar role has already been directed to be released on bail. It is contended that there was no motive on the part of the applicant to commit murder of Surendra Singh (deceased). In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let applicant Vinod Singh be released on bail on executing personal bond , and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 01.11.2011