IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.958 of 2009 DR.ARBIND KUMAR SINGH Versus AHILYA KUMARI & ORS For the Petitioner: Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate. ----------- 2 21.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 02.05.2009 passed by the Principal Judge, Madhepura in Matrimonial Case No. 22 of 2007, whereby the prayer of the opposite parties for recall of certain witnesses for cross-examination on payment of cost of Rs. 150/- has been allowed by the court concerned. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision to avail any other remedy, if available under law, in view of the provisions as contained in Section 19(5) of the Family Court Act, 1984 as well as a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Pd. Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and anr., reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, 442), wherein it has been held that no civil revision would be maintainable against an interlocutory order in view of the specific bar under section 19(5) of the Act. In the above view of the matter, the Civil 2 Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)