IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12770 of 2000 Between: K.Bangarraju, S/o.K.Satyanarayana, R/o.Gopannapalem Village, Eluru T.Q., West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director of Medical Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad - 500 001. 2 The District Medical and Health Officer, West Godavari District, ELURU-534 001. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Health Medical and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 022 4 The District Collector, Eluru - 534 001 West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the delay and inaction of the part of the Respondents in implementing the orders of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.8046/98, dated 17/03/1999 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to implement the orders of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.8046/98, dated 17/3/1999 forthwith in the interest of justice and Equity. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.PALLEM.CHITTIBABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) Aggrieved of the non-implementation of the order dated 17-03-1999 in O.A. No.8046 of 1998 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, this Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner, K. Bangarraju. 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that order of the Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.8046 of 1998, dated 17-03-1999 was already considered and implemented by the respondents considering the case of the petitioner and as it was found that the petitioner was not eligible for appointment, his case was rejected. It is further stated that even before the rejection order, the petitioner filed O.A. No.4094 of 2005 and the same was dismissed by the Tribunal by order dated 14-03-2005 holding that the claim of the petitioner was rejected by the respondents on the ground that he was not possessing the prescribed qualifications. 4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 23, 2009. __________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J DS/PV.