IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA COM. PET. No.17 of 1999 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Versus THE HELIOS FIINANCE & INVESTMENT LTD. with COM PET No.7 of 1999 SHRI KARTAR SINGH Versus M/S HELIOS FINANCE & INVESTMENT LTD. with COM PET No.18 of 2000 HARINDRA KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Versus M/S HELIOS FINANCE & INVESTMENT LTD. with COM PET No.4 of 2000 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Versus HELIOS CORPORATION LIMITED with COM PET No.7 of 2000 NAND GOPAL & ORS. Versus M/S HALIOS CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. with COM PET No.8 of 1999 MR.T.N.BITHAR Versus M/S HELIOS CORPORATION LTD. with COM PET No.6 of 1999 MR.S.R.SOIN Versus M/S HELIOS MARKETING & SERVICES LTD. with COM PET No.9 of 1999 MRS.ANITA GOEL Versus M/S HELIOS PLANTATION & DEVP.LTD. with COM PET No.6 of 2000 DEVENDRA KR.RAY & ORS. Versus M/S HELIOS PLANTATION & DEVE.LTD. ----------- 69/ 27.03.2009 It transpires that some persons claiming to be depositors/investors/unsecured creditors have filed applications, 2 which are at Flags-32A, 32B, 32C, 32D, 32E, 32F, 32G and 32H for being added as parties to Company Petition No.17 of 1999. This court feels that they are not necessary parties for disposing of the instant company petition and they may have some interest only when the claims are invited from the depositors/investors/unsecured creditors under section 474 of the Companies Act. In the said circumstances, let all these interlocutory applications be considered at the said relevant time. harish/ ( S.N.Hussain, J.)