IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.346 of 2008 UTTAM MISHRA, son of Late Yadu Nandan Mishra, resident of Village and P.O. Purshottampur, P.S. Kurhani, District Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Education Establishment Committee, Muzaffarpur, through the Chairman-Cum-District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 22.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of letter no.2106 dated 5.11.2009, as contained in Annexure A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.3, it appears that the service book and the necessary information with regard to the pay scale payable to the petitioner has been communicated to the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Accountant General submits that the matter shall be verified in the light of the aforesaid communication. Learned counsel for the State submits that since the service book and the necessary information with regard to the pay scale has been communicated to the Accountant General, verification has to be made by the Office of the Accountant General. 2 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claim for revision of pension as also the claim for arrears of pension, the petitioner shall file a representation before the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.6).In case such a representation is filed for redressal of the grievances along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter, so that the necessary P.P.O. could be issued. However, in case revised P.P.O. could not be issued, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)