COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR WR.rrPETmQN,(Cl_ _No. 1419 of2008 PETmONER RESPONDENTS -: 1. 2. 3. 4. MamnohaB Rai S/o R.K.llwari, Aged about 62 years, Ry/o Gaddvpur, Muk.tigaiij, Jonpur, (U,P.) Through: His Pov^er of Allomey I-Iolder, iiaiiiely Sliri Ajay Agrawal, S/o Chaadiram Agrawal, Aged about 46 5^ears« R/o Baiiaras Chowk, Aiibikapur, District 8wguja(C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, r]l3rough: Secretary, Reven'ae Department, D.K.S.Bliawati, Raipur, District Raipur (Clihattisgarh) Coiiector, Asiibikapur, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) Tahsildar, Aiiibikapiir, District SBiguja (CG) Sub-DivisioBal Officer (Revemie) Ambikapiir, Dis'fcrict Surgiija (CG) Narayaii. Agrawal S/o L-axm.marayan A.grawai, Wo Surajpur, District Surgaja (CG) WMT PETITION U'NDER AR'IICLE 226 OF THE CC)NSTITLmQN_OFINDIA SB:Hoii»Me_ShriSatish;K._AgiuIlotn^A Present.: Sliri Ma.noj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitj.on.er, Si-m Viiiay I-Iarit, Deputy Advocate Geiiera! for the State/ Respondent No» 1 to 4» Dr. R.ohit Yadav, Colie-ctor, Swgaja, present m perso.?i» ORAL.OSDER (Passed on 11 day of August, 2008) 1. Dr. Rohit Yadav, Collector, Surguja is present in the Court. He submits thal. the order dated 21.01.2008 passed in Revenue Case No. 119/A-21/2001- 2002, was passed after havmg considered the fact that the was pen.di.n.g consideratioB for more than five vears, He iBrth.er siibmitg that h.e was wider an impression that since th.e niatt.e.r has been heard earlier by his predecessors, 210 n.otice/intimatioii m required to be given. to-the petitioner. 2. Be that as it may, admittedly the.re wa^ a mis-iisidersta-jidmg ofthe process. When fhe matter was n.ot listed iii tlie ca.use li.st ofthe matte.rs listed before -2- the Court of Collector, the matter should not ha.ve been taken withoiit proper mtim.ati.on to tho concem.ed parties- 3. Dr. Yadav iiirther submits that he should be pemiitted to decide the .matter airesh, 0.11 its own. merif m accordan.ee with law, after intim.ating the parties. 4. ln view of the statement made by th.e Collector, Siirg'uja, according to ieamed coiin.se.1 appearmg for the petitioner, nothing sarvives m this m.attei\ 5, Accordingly, tb.e order dated 21.01»2008 stands qiiasheA The Collector, Surguja, is at liberty to pass appropriate order after affixding an opportunity ofheariag.to the parties concemed, m acco.rdan.ee witb. law, 6, In. view of the foregoiN.g,. the petition disposed of. No order asto cost.s. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Aimt