tu-P-dA^ 513|OS- B BEFORB THS SrATE ADMINISreATIVE: IRIBUNAL, JABALPUR O.A.No.^ll'jOf 199^ Tarachand Jain VS. Stafce of Madhya Prade.sh Application under Section 19 of the Adiniaistrative Tribunals Act, 1985 05TAILS Op TSS ApPLICATION / 1. Particulars of asplicant: < ^."'".. •i cltutf-i (a) Name o£ ^plicant s TaraGhand Jain <b) Pather's name : Shri K^>oorchand Jain (a) Age ; 27 years (d) Designation and office in wbich eH<ployed s Uppsr Division Teacher, Govemment Hlgh School, Patod, TohsU Kanksr, Distt. Baatar. (e) Address for riotias ; Tarachand Jain, <^/s &hr>'^-?<-3A;r) Raj-ep^-a, ne^s ttatdaS i^w,»f6r-fwr9 . Kacfcer, Disfct. Bastar. 2. Particalars of tbe re^ondent/s; Name & addresses ; l. State o£ Madhya Pradesh through secrstary, Departnent of Tribalt'ielfare, Vallabh Bhav'an, Bhopal. 2. Gommissioner/'President, Bastar Adija Jati and Anu- suchit Jati, Kshetriya Vikas Pradhikaran, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar. 3. Particulars of the ordsr agatnst which application is mades Ths application is made agaiBst the following order:- <a) Order No. (b)~Date (c) Passsd by s 1/91/85l0 ; 26th DeceiAsr 1S91 s s Coannissionar/PreEident, |; Bastar Adim Jati and Anusuchit^ Jati., ' l 'l^fe- fO*'- HIGHCOURTOF.JUDICATUREATBILASPUR: CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J WR!TPETmON(SlNg,513OT^^^^ PETmQNER Versus RESPQNDENTS Tarachand Jain State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh) & another Present: Shri Anand Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Owivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents. (ORAL QRDER) (Passed on 7th July, 2006) The petitioner was appointed as Upper Dmsion Teacher vide order dated 08-02-1990. The services of the petitioner along with 16 other similariy situated Upper Division Teachers were terminated by order dated 26-12-1991 (Annexure A/2). Some of the Upper Division Teachers, whose services have been terminated by order dated 26-12-1991 have approached the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur In various applications. All the applications along with O.A. No. 1592/1991 was allowed by order dated 13-01-1992. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents agrees with the facts as stated by learned counsel for the petitioner. Leamed counsel appearing for tiie parties submit jointly that this matter may be disposed of in terms ofthe order dated 13-01-1992, passed by Madhya Pradesh State AdminJstrative Tribunat, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 1592/1991. The relevantportion of the Order dated 13-01-19% reads as follows: (c) Passed by [^- j\ .^J.: I C>0:imn'l <•'<?-i/~i—-«*» /r>- .;11 inii.g litll; ibl)" —-z.- 'Si ^ T^ appliKrtKms are allov d.^^^^^^^^^^^^^7^ impygned <Ner t^in^ applKarte are hereby quashed. The responctents vrere directed to rejnstat&all the applteants andslso pay them back wages. Ncthing in thjs or^^ ^ preclude the respon<tonts from resymir^ a^^^^ action wAh du$ advertenw to the fwieQwng observatfon against the applicants. 1n case the reSpondents still feelthatthe applicante dM notfulfif ttie essential quailifications/F%|uirements, they can proceed^to take action aK^ingto^ W^ the applicants proper opporhinity of submitting their explanation.Thsreshallbenoofderastocosts." ^ Accordingly, the petition is alhwed. The impugned order termjrratJngtlTC%rvicesofthepeti86nerish^byqyashed.Sinc8^^^ petitioner has beerrworkjngon ttie strength of the stey ordergrantetl by the Tribunal, there is no questfon of payment of any back-wages. The respondente are at Hberty tp tatce action in awordance with la^ affording the petttioner proper opportunity of hearing. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge BsiBI^BSI SsWSSSSS '^^^•^ %^ '•i-'swasgia '••'.• :^;§1 ^ai9 •m [in';:!: i^SSBSflll SBBSBUSJ