CWP No.2562/2008. 28.11.2008 Present: Mr Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. The petitioner is working as Anganwari worker. Her appointment was challenged before the Deputy Commissioner on the ground that her income is on the higher side. Husband of the petitioner is running STD booth, having a scooter and children are studying in the school where fee of Rs.500 per month is being paid. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner’s husband from the booth earns only Rs.1300/- per annum. The scooter, in fact, belongs to the husband’s father who had gifted the same to him and the fee of the children is being paid by the mother-in-law of the petitioner. In such circumstances, the authorities have clubbed the fee paid, income from STD booth and have rightly come to the conclusion that the income of the petitioner has crossed Rs.12,000 per annum. Admittedly, the school fee of three children of the petitioner is Rs.500 per month. We do not find any illegality in the orders passed by the two Courts below. Accordingly, no interference is warranted and the writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. November 28, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (soni)