IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 13943 of 2008 Between: Smt.Jasmine W/o.Milson R/o.Ratnapur Village, Nayalkal Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Sanga Reddy, Medak. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. 3 The Tahsildar, Nayalkal Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, direction or order especially in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or orders declaring that the order in CSA/5/A/08 dated 13.6.2008 issued by the 1st Respondent upholding the order of the 3rd respondent in Proceedings No.C/5811/2008 dated 12.3.2008 suspending the Petitioner from dealership of Fair Price Shop RAtnapur, as void, arbitrary, illegal and against principles of natural justice on the ground that the adjudicating authority below had failed to comply with the guide lines prescribed for selection and appointment etc., of Fair Price Shop dealers under A.P. State Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2001 stipulated in G.O.Ms.No.53 dated 6.10.2003, in respect to Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS.1) Department and consequently failed to conduct enquiry in proper percept resulting to the impugned finding and order and therefore to quash the said order in CSA/5/A/08 dated 13.6.2008 issued by the 1st respondent and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VEMPATIMALLIKARJUN SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES This Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: The order impugned in this Writ Petition dated 13.6.2008 of the 1st respondent has been withdrawn by the said respondent by proceedings bearing Reference No. CSA/463/2008 dated 18.7.2008. In the circumstances, the grievance in the writ petition does not subsist neither does the writ petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 23.7.2008 cvm