1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.9945 of 2011 A.Chellakkani ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Registrar(Dairying), Tirunelveli Collectorate Campus, Kokkaraikulam, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Deputy Registrar(Dairying), Tirunelveli Collectorate Campus, Kokkaraikulam,Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to allow any new milk producers co-operative society within the administrative jurisdiction of the petitioner society i.e., Sillangulam and Paraman Pacheri by way of new registration and allow the TYD 582, Sillangulam and Paraman Pacheri Society Ltd., the function it territorial limit or Sillangulam and Paraman Pacheri. For Petitioners : Mr.L. Madhusudhanan For Respondents : Mr.R. Anandharaj for R1 and R2 Govt Advocate O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to allow any new milk producers co-operative society within the administrative jurisdiction of the petitioner society i.e., Sillangulam and Paraman Pacheri by way of new registration and allow the TYD 582, Sillangulam and Paraman Pacheri Society Ltd., the function it territorial limit or Sillangulam and Paraman Pacheri. 2. Heard Mr.L.Madhusudhanan, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandha Raj, learned Government Advocate who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner has made a representation to the second respondent on 23.08.2011. Since the representation has not been considered so far, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5. Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 23.08.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. If the right of any third party will be affected, it is necessary that the Authority should put such person on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 notice, so as to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioners' claim and the Authority shall decide the matter on its own merits. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( AE ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR ssl To 1. The Registrar(Dairying), Tirunelveli Collectorate Campus, Kokkaraikulam, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Deputy Registrar(Dairying), Tirunelveli Collectorate Campus, Kokkaraikulam, Tirunelveli District. 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVT PLEADER SR: 30048: DM:2011:SEP:14:: W.P(MD)No.9945 of 2011 05.09.2011 2P:4C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/