IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.24162-M of 2010 Date of Decision:5.4.2011 Satnam Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. H.S. Baath, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to record the counter- version/statement of petitioner and register the counter case against the persons named in the statement of the petitioner and investigate the matter under the relevant section of IPC. Reply by way of affidavit of Harvinder Singh PPS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Bhikhiwind, District Tarn Taran on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 has been filed. It is submitted in the said reply that as per the preliminary inquiry in the case noted above, the matter was investigated and it was found that no cross case was required to be registered. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Ranjit Singh has further stated that the statement of the petitioner was duly recorded and the matter was investigated. It was found that no cross case was made out. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant in FIR Crl. M. No.24162-M of 2010 -2- No.75 dated 4.7.2010 under Sections 302/307/148/149 IPC and 25/27 Arms Act states that the petitioner's party have already filed a criminal complaint before Illaqa Magistrate, Patti, District Tarn Taran and the same is pending. The petitioner has therefore already availed of the alternative remedy. Hence, no further order is required to be passed. Disposed of accordingly. 5.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE