1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-33610 of 2011 Date of decision : 24.01.2012 Rajwanti @ Rajan ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK Present: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana for the State. -- VIJENDER SINGH MALIK , J. (Oral) Rajwanti @ Rajan , petitioner has applied for regular bail in a case registered by way of FIR No. 54 dated 13.3.2011 at Police Station Israna, District Panipat, for an offence punishable under sections 302, 201 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and 25 of the Arms Act. The case against the petitioner in brief is that the dead body of Partap Singh was recovered but at that time it was not identified. The police took it to be a case of accident, but post mortem examination revealed his death to be on account of fire arm injury. Thereafter, Sonia came forward and made a statement during investigation. It is claimed that Sheela Devi and Anand made disclosure statements that Rajwanti @ Rajan introduced them to Manjit and Sonu, who are said to have murdered Partap Singh. 2 Crl. Misc. No.M-33610 of 2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in jail with her four years old child. He has further submitted that she is in custody since 22.03.2011. According to him, the only evidence to link her with the crime is the disclosure statement of Sheela Devi and Anand, her co-accused. On the other hand, learned State counsel does not dispute these facts on the instructions of ASI Hari Parkash. Keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner deserves to be on bail. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court. Jan.24, 2012 (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) dinesh JUDGE