IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2010 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36298 of 2010(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SARASU, W/O.MANGALASSERY MURALI, PAZHAYANNUR VILLAGE, DESOM, TALAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.JOSHI N.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF THE SUB DIVISIONAL, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR-680 001. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNUR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR-680 587. 3. CHANDRIKA AMMA, W/O.KESHAVAN NAIR, D/O.MEENAKSHI AMMA, CHITRA, PAZHAYANNUR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK-680 587. 4. K.GOVINDANKUTTY, S/O.KOTHANATH CHANDRIKA AMMA, PAZHAYANNUR VILLAGE, DESOM, TALAPPILLY TALUK-680 587. 5. VEERANKUTTY, S/O.MOIDEEN KUTTY, THOPPILPADY HOUSE, KUMBALAKODE, PAZHAYANNUR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK-680 587. R1 & R2 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36298 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5, a conditional order issued under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. According to the petitioner, on the strength of Ext.P5, petitioner is attempted to be dispossessed of the premises although Rent Control proceedings are pending at the appellate stage. 2. In my view, if the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5, it is for the petitioner to appear before the 1st respondent, appraise the 1st respondent of the background facts and to get appropriate orders in the matter. Therefore, with that liberty, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp