IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.151-M of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:30.03.2011 Smt. Seema Bansal ....Appellant versus Shri Deepak Bansal ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the respondent. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) Counsel for the appellant states that there is a settlement between parties for a decree for divorce. I must observe that there cannot be a settlement outside the purview of the Hindu Marriage Act. I reject the said settlement, but still taking view of the fact that the appellant does not want to prosecute the appeal, the appeal is dismissed and the trial Court decree is confirmed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 30.03.2011 sanjeev