IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 28TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26798 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSE @ POULOSE, S/O.POULOSE, AGED 47 MALEKUZHIYIL HOUSE,ENANALLOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI JOSEPH RESPONDENTS(S): ---------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTHAMANGALAM. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE VARAPETTY PO,KAKKATTOOR. 5. VINOD,S/O. BHASKARAN, VATTAKAZHUTHOZHIL, KAKKATTOOR,VARAPETTY, ENANALLOOR PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. 6. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE POTHANIKKAD. 7. MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).26798/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 19th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims to be the owner of 1.5 cents of property wherein he has constructed his residence as well. Apparently, the fifth respondent, according to the petitioner, is proposing to conduct a granite quarry in the nearby property and he is doing so in such a manner that the quarrying site would take in the petitioner's property also. He has brought this to the notice of the Revenue Divisional Officer vide Ext.P1, which is pending consideration. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader, writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and take appropriate action on Ext.P1, after notice to the fifth respondent as well, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs