IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12654 of 2009 1. NIRDHAN YADAV 2. Dinesh Yadav 3. Sakaldeo Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 8.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Section 363, 363(A) and 120B of the Penal Code. The submission is that the informant himself acknowledges that the petitioners are related to the informant. They had taken his son to Delhi for employment. The son died at Delhi and the death certificate issued by the competent authority shows the name of the father as Mukesh Yadav who is none other than the own brother of the informant. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the submission from the materials in the case diary. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- 2 (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 27 of 2008 arising out of Complaint Case No. 389C of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)