IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13257 of 2007 RAJENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS -------- 27.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner files reply to the counter affidavit. The petitioner is a retailed licencee under the provision of Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order, 1984. He is aggrieved by memo no. 271 dated 24.7.2008, whereby his previous licence has been cancelled by the SDO, Daudnagar on flimsy grounds. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has the remedy of appeal provided under section 28 of the Unification order, 1984. The writ petition is disposed of with observation that the petitioner should file an appeal before the appellate authority provided in section 28 of the Unification order, 1984. It would be open to the petitioner to plead before the appellate authority that as he was perusing his remedy before this Court, the delay in filing the appeal may be condoned. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).