'\;: ^ 'SS/t&il) , ?. R/7-M/500 'Y 'i- No_ Falher's namc ^':<b \c^_. ^'7 APPEAl- .Q^PRl® Name Y A •-.(••• .~^lt"<^'"'^ BesideHce yf'-VKwj ^Wj^J^^^^Ase ^i^ to_ Under section Sentenced t^"^Gr^' ^ on ~vyj~jf!/-^', :r,R^-'i: t-1 y^:liH Qiy^^ ^:^U?;^£" CF0000058818 it it explained to the prisoner that if he states or wishes to be represented by legal practitioner the Appelate court wiil not proccedwitfa the case for sevcn days unlcss ths legal paactitioner appsars earlier. If the legal practilioaer does not appearwithiii seveo 4°»s,fiemaynot be heard at all if the prisnor states that he does not wish to ll' repressnted bylegal practitioaer, the court may proceed at once wich the case aad will not be obligcd to give at bearing to any legal practitioner wbo shoiild appear. y 1. 2. 3. Date of Appiicatioa for copy of Judgement Date of wfaich copy received Date on which A.ppeal sent, ^^ ~^c'{(i 'T^ ^5iJ~yi^ _gj:f5"l^^_^, ^::;^—.:'/-'Z~J?~ ,••' '^~'" 4. Whether the prisoiier wishes to be refrestnted 01 not- (yes/tll6.) No.; ^-i-^TT- Confined in NcA -5?T?Ty-g7/^ ^.A- ^s^-a^^^T.^'^M^ >-» _^.^']gj'^~193^ o ^^/^i3^<0-^S- Forwarded to the CHIFF JUDICIAL MAQISTRATE: together with a copy of Judgement and orderpassed ia ihe case for favour of traBsmission ' to the proper Appelliate Court. XI-HC-78 \d-cq -«|^lrt0,V-At<-l<«»,firtlt'fy'; ^^. t^p^^L^-WV^'L- *11*ic)l ^tTT^? SII^STWV (•^t'yRS) ai^?7<BlftWB aaiT3n^<Ttpm<p ?7?ITW^fteT3II^ST 'pKiIn'ili fiinT^ffa'd '(ful'<'<;]'( ^3rt^T3)I^9T yl~>-£^ D.B, Hon'bleShriFakhruddjr &^yon^te ShriD.R.Dest mukh, J.J. 1947-2005 None for the appellant. Shri Akhil Mishra, Panel Learned counsel for thel been released from Central undergoing sentence, on the e^ submission is also filed in this b^half IJawyer for the State. State fnforms that ths appellant has Jail, Raipur, on 15-08-2001 aflsr 1/e of" Independence^Bay ". A written The absence of the appel the fact that the appellant is no 1 any more. ant and his counsel is also indicative of mger interested in pureuing this appeat In view of the above facts the law laid down by the Hon Naresh Yadav andLottiessVs. and circumstances and also in view of fble Apex Court in the case of Ram ^te.^fl^ffi-reported in AIR 1987 SC 1500. the appeal is dismissed fo ' non-prosecution. Sd/- khrudc Judge Dili Sd/- ,aheb E Judge