IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 35295 of 2007(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ INDIRA GANDHI COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE, NELLIKUZHI, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY IT'S CHAIRMAN. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED SMT.MOLTY MAJEED RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY IT'S REGISTRAR. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.35295/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1(a) TO P1(d): PHOTOCOPIES OF THE APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO THE AFFILIATION OF FIVE NEW COURSES EXT.P1(a) TO P1(d) DT.27.1.05. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER 28.2.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: A PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3.5.07 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: A PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.1.8.07 IN WPC NO.7592/07. EXT.P5: A PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: A PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DT.25.9.07 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY. EXT.P7: A PHOTOCOPY OF THE STATEMENT DT 4.7.07 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC NO.7592/07. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== W.P.(C) NO.35295 OF 2007 B ========================== Dated this the 8 th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner had applied for affiliation and provisional affiliation was granted by Ext.P5 subject to the outcome of a feasibility study. It is stated that in pursuance to Ext.P5, an inspection was conducted on 4/12/2007, but however the inspection team has not submitted its report to the University. On account of the delay in this behalf, the University had not confirmed Ext.P5 and hence this writ petition has been filed. 2. If as a matter of fact, inspection has been conducted as early as on 4/12/07 there is absolutely no reason for delaying submission of the inspection report to the 2nd respondent University. Therefore, the 2nd respondent will ensure that the report of inspection is received as expeditiously as possible, and the question of confirmation of Ext.P5 will also be final decision. This process shall be WPC 35295/07 :2 : completed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp