1 BA 596-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.596 OF 2011 Anwar Hasan Ali Sayyed ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO.597 OF 2011 Prakash Narayan Swami ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO.618 OF 2011 Sham Ramchandra Sonawane alias ..Applicants Vilas Laxman Patil Patkar & anr. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.R.R.Salvi, Advocate, for the Applicants in B.A.Nos.596 & 597 of 2011 Mr.C.G.Gavnekar, Advocate, for the Applicants in B.A.No.618 of 2011 Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the Respondent  State in B.A.No.596 of 2011 Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent  State in B.A.No.597 & 618 of 2011 2 BA 596-2011 CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The applicants in B.A.Nos.596, 597 & 618 of 2011 are imposters, who appeared before the Sub-registrar posing to be the owners of land as different persons. The learned Counsel for the applicants states that one Surbhi Mishra, who was master mind and at whose behest the applicants have done this, has been bailed out. The case against Surbhi that had been made out before me when she had purchased the land from these imposters, who posed themselves as owners of the land. She in turn sold it to one S.S.K.Kanak for Rs. 1,17,59,244/-. She has purchased the land and sold it. Her case, therefore, cannot be equated to the case of the persons, who had 3 BA 596-2011 actually impersonated by posing as different person before the Sub-registrar. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicants also states that not only the applicants but one Mukarram Hasan Ali Sayyed had received a sum of Rs.14,00,000/- through his brother, who in turn had received it from Surbhi Mishra and he has been bailed out. Therefore, the applicants' receiving some of the amount of booty cannot justify their detention. Now, Mukarram Hasan Ali Sayyed had not received any amount directly from the participants in the crime. He received money from his brother. His brother had received it as his share in the crime. Therefore, since there is nothing to show that Mukarram Hasan Ali Sayyed had participated in the crime itself and so he was called, his being bailed out does not help the applicants. 4. The applicant Anwar Hasan Ali Sayyed 4 BA 596-2011 in B.A.No.596 of 2011 is brother of said Mukarram. Anwar Sayyed's Bank statement shows that the transactions of more than Rs. 1,94,00,000/- have passed through his Bank account and in fact, payment had been made by him to various actors in this episode. Therefore, it cannot be said that he could be admitted to bail on the ground of parity or even on merits. 5. Applications are, therefore, rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)