IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33417 of 2008 SHAILENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 12. 01. 09. Heard. The petitioner prays for cancellation of bail granted to Opposite Party No. 2, by the Sessions Judge, Patna, by order dated 9. 5.2008, in complaint Case No. 1586©/2007 for offence under Section 420 I.P.C. and 138 N.I. Act. Sessions Judge while granting bail took into consideration the submission of Opposite Party No. 2, that it is a simple case of cheque bouncing which lays civil liability as well as one of accounting. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if notice is issued, compromise between the parties may arise in the case. After hearing the parties, this Court observes that parties may exercise the aforesaid option in the court of Sessions Judge, if so advised. This Court further observes that the trial should proceed without unnecessary adjournment. As such, this Court directs that Opposite Party No. 2, would not physically absent in the court below for two consecutive dates at a stretch till three witnesses be examined. With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of. m.p. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)