IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 34528 of 2010(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ T.R.LALJI, S/O.RAGHAVAN, THAKADIYIL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.VIJU ABRAHAM, SRI.DINNY THOMAS, SRI.SRUTHI M. SRI.DOMINIC JOHNSON. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE RESERUVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KANJIRAPALLY - 686 507. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KANJIRAPALLY - 686 507. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHIRAKKADAVU - 686 520. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 34528 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 16th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, he along with his brother purchased 3.54 ares of land as per Ext.P1 sale deed dated 7/9/91. It is stated that despite the above, tax is accepted only in respect of 1.92 ares of land. It is stated that this anomaly has occurred on account of a mistake committed by the respondents in effecting transfer of Registry, and therefore, seeking correction of the aforesaid alleged mistake, he has filed Ext.P7 application before the 2nd respondent. 2. In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P7 application and pass orders thereon. Having regard to the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, without expressing anything on the merits of the claim raised, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7. This the 2nd respondent shall do, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp