IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1839 of 2010 1. Dr. Punam Kumari D/O Sri Baidyanath Thakur And W/O Sri Anil Kumar Sharma R/O Mohalla- Ram Dayalunagar, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadpur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur………………………………………………………………………..Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Secretary Animal Husbandry And Fisheries Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Director, Fisheries Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 5. The Bihar Public Service Commission Through Its Chairman Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna 6. The Deputy Secretary Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna 7. The Officer-On-Special Duty Bihar Public Service Commission, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Patna……………………………………………………………..Respondents ----------- 02/ 1st August 2011 Heard the parties. Challenge in this appeal is order dated 30.08.2010 passed in CWJC No. 3139/2004 where- under the learned single Judge dismissed the writ preferred by appellant/petitioner on the sole ground that the list prepared by BPSC has lost its validity on account of efflux of time. After going through the judgment impugned, this Court finds that it is no-where pleaded on behalf of respondents/State as well as BPSC that the list was effective for a particular period which has already expired and on account thereof it has lost its authenticity. The simple question involved happens to be with regard to consideration of appellant’s name against the vacancies which continued on account of 2 non joining of the other incumbents whose names were recommended by the BPSC. As such, the appellant is directed to represent before the authority concerned for consideration of her name against the post remained vacant on account of non joining of other incumbents and the authority concerned will pass a judicious order after taking into account the circumstances which may be already available since before within two months on presentation of representation along with the present order. With the aforesaid observation, the appeal is disposed of. perwez (Prakash Chandra Verma, J.) (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)