IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31925 of 2008 BINOD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.08.2008 Heard. Allegation against the petitioner is that he pierced Chhura into the stomach of the son of the informant who subsequently died during the treatment in hospital. The contention is that the Court should peruse the case diary then it can find that some persons have not supported the incident rather have stated that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. The learned Judge has written a detailed and well discussed order and that goes to show that there was no such statement in the case diary rather persons have supported the fact that the petitioner “ran” his Chhura into the stomach of the deceased. Petitioner appears to be the assailant. Petition dismissed. kksinha/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)