IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.202 of 2011 Harsh Kishore Singh, S/o- Late Raj Kishore Singh, R/o Village-Keotgama, P.S.-Kusheshwar Asthan, District-Darbhanga ……….Defendant 1ST Party/Petitioner Versus 1. Most. Bibha Singh W/o Late Rajkishore Pd. Singh R/o Village- Keotgama, P.S.-Kusheshwar Asthan, District-Darbhanga ……… Plaintiff/ Respondent 2. Mahabir Yadav S/o Late Mohan Yadav 3. Mahendra Yadav S/o Chhotkarn Yadav Both Resident of Village-Keotgama Tola-Salamgarh, P.S.- Kusheshwar Asthan, District-Darbhanga …………….Defendant/2nd Party/Respondents ----------- 02 22.06.2011 The defendant-petitioner herein is aggrieved by order dated 15.11.2010 whereby the learned trial court allowed the amendment petition of plaintiff-respondent under rule 17. The said amendment petition filed by the plaintiff has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. It would appear from the impugned order that no rejoinder of the amendment petition was filed by the plaintiff before the trial court. In this view of the matter, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order dated 15.11.2010. However, the defendant-petitioner herein is at liberty to file an additional written statement. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of. Shahzad ( S.P. Singh, J.)