: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.505 OF 2008 IN BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT NOTICE OF MOTION NO.773 OF 2008 IN L.C. SUIT NO.2616 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.581 OF 2008 Kailash J. Worlikar ..Appellant. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.M.N.Havnur for the Appellant. Ms.M.B.Gawade for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : In addition to the reasons already furnished in the impugned order, it was pointed out that against the order dated 16.6.2006 passed by the Mumbai City Civil Court, an Appeal from Order No.447 of 2006 was filed in this Court. The order of status-quo was continued pending the hearing of the Appeal from Order on 27.7.2006. However, by an order dated 27.9.2006 the Appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. The order dated 16.6.2006 therefore attained finality. : 2 : 2. The Notice of Motion in which the impugned order has been passed seeks a stay of the order dated 16.6.2007. The year 2007 is, as stated by Mr.Havnur a typographical error. The prayer obviously refers to the said order dated 1.6.2006. However, in view of the Appeal from Order No.447 of 2006 having been disposed of, such a relief could not have been granted. 3. In the circumstances, Appeal from Order is dismissed. Nothing survives in the Civil Application which is also dismissed as such. ***