1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.73/2008 Bhaskar s/o Shamrao Dhopate ..Versus... Bhaktraj Sewakramji Gaurkhede -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri A.J. Thakkar, Adv. for applicant] [Shri N.V. Dafrey, Adv. for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 06.10.2008 Heard learned Counsel for the rival parties. The trial Court has directed the plaintiff to value the suit correctly on the basis of rent. The valuation has accordingly been made by the Court and ordered plaintiff to pay court fee. This is the order which is under challenge in this revision. Learned Counsel for applicant states that valuation fixed by the Government agency on ready reckoner basis should have been the criteria for valuation of the suit. 2 In the light of the decision in the case of Shrikrishna Bhau Parab & others...Versus...Dr. Mrs. Roshan S. Boyce, reported in 1995 (1) Bom.C.R. 429, the valuation has been correctly made by the trial Court. No interference is called for. Civil Revision Application is dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw