IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.REVISION APPLN. NO.7/2009 Mahendra Pujan Gupta Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents Mr.R.L.Majgaonkar for the applicant Mr.Mahesh Jethmalani Sr.Counsel for res.no.2 Ms.S.V.Gajare,APP for State CORAM:Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J. DATE :24th July,2009. P.C. . The private party has preferred the revision under section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure . It is objected by the learned counsel appearing for the accused . The challenge is on the ground of maintainability as the revision is filed by the private party i.e.original complainant. The matter being under the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988 the learned A.P.P.is asked to make statement whether the State has preferred appeal or is going to file the appeal.The learned A.P.P.submits that as per the record the matter was not referred by the Prosecutor of the Sessions Court for appeal to the Law and Judiciary Department. Hence the State is not going to prefer any appeal. Hence leave refused ,the Revision application is disposed of accordingly. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.)