1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8765 OF 2007 Anant Prasad Vedvyas Umerji .. Petitioner Versus Chairman/Secretary Lilatai Vishwanath Patil Nagari Coop. Pat Sanstha Maryadit .. Respondent CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3rd December 2007 P.C. . The petitioner must comply with the mandate of section 154(2a) as directed by this Court earlier. I will not fault revisional authority for not complying with the said provisions of law and even now, if the petitioner pays the amount which is required by law to be paid/deposited under the recovery certificate and produce proof in that behalf, On such payment/deposit the revision application which is 2 dismissed shall be restored to file and heard. Revision application can be decided on merits and in accordance with law. If the petitioner does so within four weeks from today, revisional authority to permit the petitioner to argue this petition on merits. If no compliance is made even in the extended period, revisional application to stand dismissed without further orders. Petition dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)