IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10280 of 2010(O) -------------------------- OS.69/2010 of MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHANGANACHERRY .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- TOMY JOB, S/O.LATE IYYO, MUKKADA HOUSE, NALUNNACKAL P.O., VAKATHANAM KARA, VAKATHANAM VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- DEVASIA MATHAI, S/O.MATHAI, VADAKKE MUKKADA (CHERIYA MUKKADA) HOUSE, NALUNNACKAL P.O., VAKATHANMAM KARA, VAKASTHANAM VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------------------- WP(C) No.10280 of 2010-O ------------------------------------- Dated 26th March 2010 Judgment In this Writ Petition, the petitioner assails Ext.P8 order passed by the Munsiff's Court, Changanacherry, dismissing his application for interim injunction. 2. When the matter was being heard, this Court pointed out that the order impugned is an appealable order and therefore, it is not possible to entertain the Writ Petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner then contended that there is an illegality in the procedure followed by the Court below and therefore, writ may be entertained. 3. Even assuming what the petitioner says is true, it is open to him to raise all those grounds by filing an appeal before the appropriate forum. Leaving open the liberty of the petitioner to do so, this Writ Petition is disposed of. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE 2 sta 3