1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1102 OF 2009 Deepakkumar Dwarkadas Agrawal Vs. State of Maharashtra and other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Mr. S.A. Mohta, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.M. Kale, A.P.P. for the respondent No.1. Mr. A.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondent No.2. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED :- 13th AUGUST, 2009. 1. As the matter was called out learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner be given liberty to withdraw this petition and challenge the various orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akola as regards exhibiting certain documents at the time of final hearing of the trial. 2. The learned Advocate Mr. Deshpande for the respondent No.2 submitted that the complaint is of the year 2003 and therefore, some orders be passed regarding expeditious hearing of the case. 3. I have heard learned Advocates on both sides. Petitioner is allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders regarding exhibiting/not exhibiting documents at the stage of final argument. Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akola is directed to hear and dispose of the trial being 2 Summary Criminal Case No. 5035/2003 as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31st of March, 2010. The petition stands disposed of at the state of admission, accordingly. JUDGE pma.