THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No. 1888 of 2011 JUDGMENT: The appeal is filed against the judgment dated 27.12.2003 in O.P.No.27 of 1999 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- cum-III Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Nizamabad seeking enhancement of the compensation for the injuries received in a motor accident. According to the appellant, the petitioner is a lorry driver and on 05.05.1998 when the petitioner was checking his lorry tyres, the Hero Honda motorcycle bearing No.MH-32-D-359 driven by 1st respondent, insured with the 2nd respondent, came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the petitioner, as a result of which, he received injuries. He claimed compensation of Rs.2,50,000/-. The insurance company filed written statement denying the accident and disputing the nature of injuries, treatment and earnings of the petitioner and its liability. After considering the evidence on record, the lower Tribunal granted a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the medical record and also the evidence on record show that the petitioner suffered disability. According to the claim of the petitioner, he sustained injuries to his both legs, head and was in hospital for 45 days and he claims to have taken treatment in private hospital. He examined P.W.2, who has seen the petitioner long after the incident and issued the disability certificate Ex.A-5. His evidence is only that from the verification of the old medical record, he gave the disability certificate. Evidently, the disability certificate issued by him is not valid for consideration in the claims under motor accidents. But, however, the lower Tribunal has taken into consideration Ex.A-3, which shows three injuries, which are grievous in nature. The petitioner was said to have been treated in a hospital and confined. No medical bills are also filed. There is no proof of any operation conducted to the petitioner. The doctors, who treated the petitioner, were not examined. But, however, the lower Tribunal taking into consideration to the totality of the circumstances, has granted a lumpsum amount of Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation and I do not think that it is on a lesser side. It appears to be just and reasonable compensation, which does not call for any interference. Accordingly, there are no merits in the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. No costs. ________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J 25-08-2011 MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No. 1888 of 2011 DATE: 25-08-2011 MR