-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1852 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1852 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1852 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.1309 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1309 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1309 OF 2005 Ambadas Saidu Shinde ...Applicant vs. Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Saunstha and others ...Respondents Mr.S.S.Shah for the Applicant Mr.P.D.Dalvi for the Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MARCH 21, 2006. MARCH 21, 2006. MARCH 21, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Shah for the Applicant and Shri Dalvi for the Respondent No.1. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) is already granted. The result of the ad-interim relief is that the order of transfer passed on 14th December 1995 against the Applicant remains stayed. As the Second Appeal is admitted for final hearing, ad-interim relief granted deserves to be continued till the final disposal of the Appeal. However, it is made clear that the grant of this interim relief will not preclude the Respondents from exercising power under Rule 41 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by passing the following order: i) Ad-interim relief granted on 21st October 2005 will continue to operate till final disposal of the Appeal. ii) Grant of interim relief will not preclude the Respondent No.1 from exercising the power under Rule 41 of said Rules of 1981. No order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.