IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-3066 of 2011 Date of decision: 1.2.2011 Parveen Kumar …. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …. Respondents Present : Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. *** S.S. SARON, J. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner who is the complainant in a complaint case titled Parveen Kumar v. Shanker Lal Hasija & Others pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala. The petitioner has also filed a similar application seeking cancellation of bail of accused Vas Dev (respondent No.2) before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala vide order dated 22.12.2010 (Annexure P4) has ordered the listing of the said application on 7.2.2011 which is the date already fixed in the main case. It has been observed in the said order dated 22.12.2010 (Annexure P4) that the main file of the case has been requisitioned by this Court in the revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition is listed for hearing on 3.2.2011. Therefore, keeping in view the fact that the application seeking cancellation of bail is already pending in the court of CRM No. M-3066 of 2011 [2] learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, it would be improper for this Court to carry out parallel proceedings on the same subject matter. The petitioner may make his request before the Bench hearing the revision petition for sending the case file back to the Court of the learned trial Court so as to enable the purpose of consideration of his application for seeking cancellation of bail which is now listed for hearing on 7.2.2011 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala. Accordingly, the Crl. Misc. petition is dismissed being premature. (S.S. SARON) JUDGE February 1, 2011 amit