IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16417 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 05, 2011 Santosh Yadav ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Om Pal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel refers to Annexures P-3 and P-4 where somewhat contradictory medical reports have been given by the same Hospital, i.e., V.M.M.C. & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. Earlier opinion was that there is mild conductive hearing loss in both ears, whereas in the subsequent report, it is recorded that L/R normal hearing. In this background, the counsel contends that authorities are required to take an appropriate decision and she is even prepared to undergo medical test by a Board of constituted in this regard. For the same cause, the petitioner has already served a legal notice. The present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take appropriate decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. September 05, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE