IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 632 of 2011 Date of Decision: April 04, 2011 Rajinder Kumar ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raveesh Kaushik, AAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ, for the release of detenues mentioned in the headnote of the petition from the illegal custody of respondent No.4. Reply filed by respondents No.1 to 3 is on the file and is to the effect that none of the alleged detenues was found to be in illegal custody of respondent No.4. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous as all the alleged detenues have since been release. In view of the abovesaid reply and statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further action is required to be taken at this stage. Hence, the instant petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. April 04, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE