pvr 1 WP4861-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4861 OF 2010 Sukhlal Dhudku Ahire ...Petitioner vs. 1.The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.Rahul S.Kate, for Petitioner. Mr.Ramesh D.Rane, for Respondent no.4. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATED: 7th October, 2010 P.C.: 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges order dated 17.3.2010 by which Smt.Paithankar i.e. Respondent no.5 has been wrongly given the date 12.8.1985 as the date on which she is to be entitled to be in category C . Admittedly, Smt.Paithankar was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the school concerned on 12.8.1985 and on the date of her appointment pvr 2 WP4861-10 itself she was BA. B.Ed. So far as the petitioner is concerned, he was appointed on 18.9.1978 but his qualification was SSC D.Ed., therefore, he was not entitled to be in category C . In June,1984 he acquired graduation but his training qualification was not improved and therefore, in the year 1984 also the petitioner was not entitled to be in category C . He became entitled to be in category C on acquiring B.Ed. qualification and that he acquired in the year 1993. Therefore, by the impugned order finding to that effect has been recorded. We do not see any illegality in the order. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J.)