IN THE HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATSILASPUR W.P.ISt NO. 3fr°V OF2011 (S.B.l. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Tula Ram Verrna, S/o. late Shri Samaru Ram Verma, aged about 54 years, Upper DivisioA Teacher, Govf. Middle School Torla, atta.ched Govt. High School Torla, Block Abhanpur, District Raipur (C. G.) VERSUS :!/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Ttie Seeretaiy, School Education Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) / -.•.•:'•• 2. Districf Education Offfeer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) 3. Principal, Govt. Higher Secondaiy Sehobl Pond, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) / 4. TreasUIy Officer, TreaSUty Account and Pension, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C. G.) WRIT PiETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTlTUTION OF INDIA The petitioner begs to submit as under:- ,\ HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra MohanShrivastava. J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (St N0.3001/2011 Tula Ram Verma Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE22eOFTHEGONSITUTIONOFINDIA Present: - Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, DeputyAdvocate GeneralfortheState. ORALORDER (Passed on 20th June, 2011) The petltioner was initially appointed as Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After completion of his probation period, he was granted regular pay scaleofRs.169-300/-. 2 . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion ofprobation psriod. 3. The issue involved herein was considered bythe Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in OAMo.27451S9 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State ofM.P. &others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regularpay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed bythe Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of \ '27. "^, _2_. the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular payscale from the date ofinftial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (urther submits that this Court.while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006, by order dated 01-09-2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representatfon within a period of ten days, raising all the grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all grie\@nces in light of the aforestated judgment and the circular dated 05-01-2011 (Annexure P-6) and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt ofthe representatfon, subject to verification ofthe facts. 6. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ^ Judge