CRM No. M 36284 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 36284 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.03.2011 Surjit Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Sanjeev Manhas, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 read with Section 427 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to the respondents that sentence awarded in seven challans arising out of one case FIR No. 74 dated 08.04.1997 under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 109, 120-B IPC, P S Kotwali Bathinda District Bathinda by separate judgments by the same Court to run concurrently. It is, now, well settled proposition of law as well as the law already laid down by the Full Bench in the case of Jang Singh v. State of Punjab 2008(1) RCR (Criminal) 323, that the jurisdiction to direct the CRM No. M 36284 of 2009 2 sentences to run concurrently lies before the trial Court or in appeal or revision and not in a petition under Section 482 and Section 427 of the Code is not maintainable. Accordingly, the said relief cannot be granted to the petitioner in a petition filed under Section 482 and 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Dismissed as not maintainable. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 15.03.2011 mohan CRM No. M 36284 of 2009 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.7043-M of 2010 Date of Decision:21.1.2011 Mangal Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. G.S. Thind, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Dhaliwal, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for issuance of directions to respondent to execute warrant of execution of sentence concurrently. 21.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE