IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23803 of 2010 MITHUN KUMAR son of Maheshwar Rai, resident of village- Paharpur, P.S.-Sakara, Dist.-Muzaffarpur. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 28.2.2011. Heard Mrs. Madhubala Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Mr. S.K.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Tajpur Pusa P.S. Case No.123 of 2009 for the offence under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. It was a case of road robbery. The petitioner was, subsequently, identified during test identification parade. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition, submits that in the case diary it has come that local witnesses have disclosed the name of other accused persons. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the present case. In this case antecedent report of the petitioner was called for which has been received and is kept at flag ‘A’. It shows that the petitioner was accused in at least three other cases. In the facts and circumstances, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)