IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41001 of 2008 AMRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA @ FANTY MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02.12.2008 Heard. Petitioner is working at Ludhiyana. For that purpose, he resides there. Though, there is no specific averment in the body of the petition that on the date of the alleged occurrence, he was at Ludhiyan but an impression to that effect has been given by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Be that as it may, petitioner had set the house of the informant on fire some time past in respect whereof, no contemporaneous F.I.R. was lodged. Subsequently, the present complaint was lodged by filing the F.I.R. only after the father of the petitioner has filed a complaint against the son of the informant. Taking into account the said state of affairs, the application for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No. 09 of 2 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. S.B.P. (Barin Ghosh, J.)