THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7458 OF 2010 Between : Smt.Pothaganti Ramavva @ Narsavva&another ....PETITIONERS A N D The State of A.P. and another …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7458 OF 2010 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in First Information Report No.163 of 2010 of Nizamabad Police Station. 2. The allegations against the petitioners runs as follows: “The facts of the case are that on 07.07.2010 at 2030 hours the complainant Sri Subramanya Vijay Kumar S/o Chinna Thandri Armugam Subramanyam, 47 years, Hindu by caste Occ:Senior Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, Kamareddy R/o Muthyapu Sudhakar, Vivekananda Colony, Kamareddy N/o Plot No.137, Sree Sai Residency, Vijayapuri Colony, near PACE School, A.S.Rao Nagar, Post ECIL, Hyderabad-62 came to P.S. and lodged a petition in which he stated that we wish you that Smt Kummari Ramavva W/o Late Ramulu, resident o H.No.3-126, Hussain Nagar, Sirikonda Mandal along with his son Sri Rajeshwar had opened savings account on 15- 10-2009 by impersonating as P.Narsavva Subsequently they have submitted a cheque bearing No.956160 dated 21-8-2009 for Rs.1,66,484/- issued by LIC of Indian and withdrawn the total amount. We have been informed by LIC vide their letter dated 10.5.2010 that Smt P.Narsavva had complained non receipt of her claim amount. The cheque pertains to settlement of death claim of Pothuganti Ramulu and he had nominated Pothganti Narsavva as his nominee. We have contacted Sri Rajeshwar and his mother and they have accepted for the mistake and assured to settle the issue by repaying the amount. Till date they have not repaid the amount of Rs.1,66,484/- (Rupees one lakh sixty six thousand four hundred and eighty four only) Hence, we request you to file a case against Smt Kummari Ramavva for impersonation and fraudulent withdrawal of the amount pertaining to P.Narsavva and also file a case against Sri Rajeshwar for assisting and conspiring for doing the above act kindly do the needful”. 3. This Court perused the complaint. It clearly reveals the manner in which the petitioners herein cheated not only the Bank but also one Narsavva, who is the nominee of late Pothaganti Ramulu. Hence, this Court is not inclined to quash the complaint and the Investigation Officer is directed to conclude the investigation within a period of three months from today and to file the charge. 4. With the above direction, the criminal petition is disposed of. _________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO AUGUST 04, 2010. YVL