IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.448 of 2007 MAZHARUL BARI . Versus STAET OF BIHAR & ORS . with CR. REV. No.1072 of 2008 JAFAR ALAM . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.41478 of 2008 SANTOSH BHARTI & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . with CR. REV. No.1083 of 2008 DIGVIJAY SINGH & ANR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with CR. REV. No.1084 of 2008 RANJEET KUMAR & ANR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . with CR. REV. No.1101 of 2008 BINOD BIHARI LAL . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CR. REV. No.1108 of 2008 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CR. REV. No.1113 of 2008 SERU RAI & ANR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with CR. REV. No.1114 of 2008 ASHOK VISWKARMA . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CR. REV. No.1116 of 2008 MUZAFFAR ALI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ------------ - 2 - 4. 8.4.2010 Nothing is common on merit in the above-mentioned cases but one thing is common that none appears on behalf of the petitioners of the cases to show that material was existing for calling for the records of above-mentioned cases which only can be done by this Court itself or it comes to its knowledge, otherwise mean to say that filed by the petitioners. Once petitioners appear absent, no question arises about coming to knowledge of this Court another material justifying calling for the records to exercise any of the powers conferred on this Court in appeal under sections 386, 389, 390 and 391 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, all the above-mentioned cases are rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )