IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29300 of 2009 BABUAN CHOUDHARY @ JAG NARAYAN CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 31/08/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections- 396 and 412 of I.P.C. The impugned order from the materials in the case diary notices that his name has transpired on the confession of a co-accused from whom the mobile phone of the victim being used by the co-accused was recovered and on the confession of the petitioner a cream coloured muffler of the deceased was recovered from him. The impugned order further states that the petitioner has antecedents. The submission is that the material against him is the confession of a co-accused. This Court is not persuaded to grant bail to the petitioner. The application is rejected. Should the co-accused be enlarged on bail, if so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)