1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3266/2008 Fateh Lal @ Fata & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another. Date of order : 21.05.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. B.S.Sandhu for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners made a representation vide Annex.2 dated 20.2.2008 to the respondent Secretary, U.I.T., Udaipur and the representation has not yet been decided and without deciding the same, the respondents are proceeding to construct the road on the land which belongs to the petitioners. From the perusal of the writ petition, there is no adverse order except the averments made in the writ petition by the petitioners that the respondents have proposed to construct the road, even no proposal has been placed on record. In the 2 circumstances, therefore, it would be just and proper to direct the respondent U.I.T. to decide the representation Annex.2 dated 20.2.2008 filed by the petitioners within 15 days from the date of producing the certified copy of this order. With this direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp 3 S.B.CIVIL MISC. STAY PETITION NO. 6029/08 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3266/2008 Fateh Lal @ Fata & Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another. Date of order : 21.05.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. B.S.Sandhu for the petitioners. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp