IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2010 / 14TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 34637 of 2009(Y) PETITIONERS: 1. REGINA YOHANNAN, AGED 80 YEARS, W/O. LATE YOHANNAN, VATTATHIL HOUSE, VADACKAL.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. 2. FR.V.Y. DASAPPAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. LATE YOHANNAN, LECTURER AND VICE PRINCIPAL OF ST. XAVIER'S COLLEGE, THUMBA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. V.Y. THOMAS, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. LATE YOHANNAN, VATTATHIL HOUSE, VADACKAL.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI THANKAPPAN RESPONDENTS: 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUNNAPRA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBALAPUZHA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA. WP(C) 34637/2009 :2: 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. V.Y. RAJU, AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE YOHANNAN, VATTATHIL HOUSE, VADACKAL.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD FOR R5 GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 34637/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUB MITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WOMEN CELL, ALAPPUZHA ON 16.11.2009. EXT.P2 A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 21.11.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KNC/- P.R. RAMAN & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 34637 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2010. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Regina Yohannan, the first petitioner, aged 80 years, is stated to be residing in the family house along with the third petitioner. The second petitioner Fr. V.Y. Dasappan, who is the son of the first petitioner wants to visit her in the family house, where she is residing as stated above. It is alleged that the 5th respondent is causing obstruction. Earlier, this Court recorded some arrangement between the parties to work out a settlement. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the arrangement did not work out. In the circumstances, there will be a direction that in case the second petitioner approaches the second respondent Circle Inspector of Police, he will be escorted to the house where the first petitioner is residing so as to enable the second petitioner to see his mother, the first petitioner, without being objected by the 5th respondent. Writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. KNC/-