cp69.10.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 69 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 5136 of 2009 ( Asaram Dashrath Ekhar ..vs.. Shri Vinod Harkande and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. M.P. Kalar, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: R. K. Deshpande, J. Date : April 12 th , 2010 1. This Contempt Petition complains about willful disobedience of the order dated 10th December, 2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5136 of 2009. 2. This Court had recorded the statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader that further steps will be taken in accordance with law. The complaint of the petitioner was that inspite of the order passed by the Minister, Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection directing the District Supply Officer, Bhandara to pass final order regarding the suspension of the shop of the respondent No.2. The District Supply Officer, Bhandara had not passed any final order. In this Contempt Petition cp69.10.odt 2 . the complaint is that inspite of the direction of the Minister, Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection to pass final order, the District Supply Officer, Bhandara passed an interim order suspending the fair price shop of one Shri Ramesh Pandurang Ikhar. 3. What is in substance the complaint in the instant petition is, the willful disobedience of order dated 28-7-2009 passed by the Minister, Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection, directing the District Supply Officer, Bhandara to pass final order regarding the suspension of the shop of the respondent No.2. This Court had merely recorded a statement of the learned Assistant Government pleader that further steps will be taken in accordance with law. Hence, there is no question of any disobedience or breach of the order passed by this Court. If at all there is disobedience or breach, it is of the order passed by the Minister, Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned Minister for redressal of his grievance. 4. There is no substance in this Contempt Petition, the same is dismissed. JUDGE adgokar cp69.10.odt 3 .