IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1888 of 2009 MEENA DEVI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 6.2.2009 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. This Court would only notice that certain anomalies were pointed out by the petitioner with regard to functioning of Mukhiya of Itawa Sheonagar Gram Panchayat. Such allegations made by the petitioner in fact also appear to have received attention of the Commissioner of Darbhanga Division as is born out from his communication dated 12.12.2008 (Annexure 17). The grievance of the petitioner that despite the direction given by the Commissioner, the Collector of the district has not taken the remedial action, therefore has same semblance of a right of consideration. This Court would find that the matter is of some significance and is also of public importance and therefore, the Collector of Darbhanga district is required to take action in accordance with law. That being so, this application is 2 disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner of Darbhanga Division and the Collector, Darbhanga district to take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law preferably within a period of six months. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/