IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1408 of 2011 Ram Brichh Prasad, Son of Late Tikan Singh, resident of Village- Barsiyavan, P.O. Salehpur, P.S.Telhara, District- Nalanda...............................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...............................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 04.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 504 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(X) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that being the co-ordinator of the Panchayat School he asked the complainant to bring something from market and on his refusal the petitioner abused the complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no police case was lodged as the alleged occurrence took place on 08.03.2010 but the complaint has been filed maliciously after nine days that is on 17.03.2010. Though in the complaint, it is mentioned that the police report was lodged, in spite of that, the learned court below without calling any report from the police station has 2 taken cognizance. Considering the nature of accusation and unexplained delay in lodging of the complaint, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 163 (C) of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J. M. Ist Class, Hilsa(Nalanda), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)