C.R. No.102 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.102 of 2007 Date of Decision.10.03.2010 Jaibhagwan son of Krishan Kumar and others ........Petitioners Versus Shiv Charan and another ....Respondents Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.S. Sangwan, Advocatae for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. At the time when the case was admitted on 12.01.2007, the Court has directed the parties to maintain status quo regarding possession and has further observed that the trial of the proceedings could go on as expeditiously as possible. The order passed at that stage is maintained now and the civil revision is disposed of with the observations that the trial Court has in suit for specific performance denied to the petitioner the relief of injunction holding that there is no proof of possession other than a recital for delivery of possession in the agreement. The Court had also observed that a mere agreement does not create transfer of title in the property. The defendant, on the other than, claim under a sale deed, although characterized by the plaintiff as a sale, C.R. No.102 of 2007 -2- which was subsequent to the agreement. The Appellate Court had directed the retention of status quo in para 9 and in the succeeding para, he had stated that the appeal was allowed and reversed the decision of the trial Court. 2. The trial Court's finding that there was no prima facie proof of possession and denying to the relief of injunction is maintained and the civil revision is allowed. The trial Court shall endeavour to conclude the trial of the case as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 10, 2010 Pankaj*