IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22052 of 2011 Bharat Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ***** 03. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 12/2011, for the offences under Sections 379/420/272/273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act, is named accused in this case but only on disclosure by the driver of the vehicle in extra judicial confession as of the wine belonging to the petitioner without any other specific details. Submission is that petitioner has falsely been implicated. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor in spite of being armed with carbon copy of the case diary up to paragraph 6 dated 23.05.2011 could not point out any material from the investigation till date showing implication of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 12/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)