1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 27.09.2010 Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1-A to 1-E. 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicants and learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. There are concurrent findings of facts that the applicants had admitted their default in paying rent. Therefore, there is no question of interference in the concurrent findings of facts. In my opinion there is no perversity in the impugned judgment. The Civil Revision Application stands dismissed. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2010/SEP10/cra144.10