IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11283/2008 Decided on:20.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Ravi Dass. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. M.P. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he had completed ten years and his services are required to be regularized immediately after completion of ten years continuous service. It is evident from Annexure R-IV that the petitioner had only completed ten years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year with effect from 1995. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, with all the consequential 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 benefits, within a period of two months, after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 20.12.2010 *awasthi*