gst 1 ao1105.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1105 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1361 OF 2010. Shashikant Deviprasad Sharma .... ..... ..... Appellant. V/s Ramakrishna Ramnath Pandey... .... .... Respondent. Mr.R.A.Shaikh, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Diwakar Dwivedi, Adv. For the respondent. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 2nd February., 2011 PC: The limited grievance of the appellant is that though the learned trial Court has found the appellant to be in possession, the injunction has been refused on the ground that the story put forth by the appellant regarding purchase of suit property is false. It is grievance of the appellant that in any event, he could not have been dispossessed without following due process of law. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-defendant states that the defendant has already taken steps for filing a suit before Small Causes Court for eviction of the present appellant. It is thus clear that even according to the defendant present appellant cannot be evicted without following due process of law and he has already taken recourse to the same. In that view of the matter nothing survives in the grievance of the appellant. Hence appeal stands dismissed. 3. In view of disposal of appeal Civil Application No.1361 of 2010 does not survive and the same also stands disposed of.