1 W.P.No.3620.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2010 Lad Survanakar Mitra Manal Sanstha through its Chairman ... PETITIONER V E R S U S Rajesh Omkarlal Rode and others ... RESPONDENTS ... Mr.V.D.Hon ,Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.P.Chapalgaonkar,Advocate for respondents. ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 4TH MAY, 2010. PER COURT : 1] Heard Counsel. 2] This petition is being disposed of, in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, in the following manner: (a) The petitioners will not cause any damage to the middle wall, which was inspected and lies in between the house properties No 1- and 1-D. (b) They will construct another wall adjoining to the existing middle wall on the part of their property bearing CTS No.888, without touching to the middle wall which is under dispute. 2 W.P.No.3620.10 (c) The impugned order is, therefore, not disturbed and is maintained, but stands modified whereby the petitioners may be allowed to construct adjoining wall within the boundary limits of their own property CTS No.888. With these observations the petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- ( V.R.KINGAONKAR ) JUDGE MTK