1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4635/2008 (Vinodkumar Shrivishnuji Toshniwal and another vs. Rashtriya Vaidyak Prasarak Mandal and others) ====================================== CORAM : B.P.Dhamadhikari, J. DATE : 21 st NOVEMBER, 2008 Heard. After hearing Advocate Sarda, for the petitioners, it appears that initially the appointments to be made were subjected to final decision of Misc. Appeal NO. 60/2008 by Principal District Judge, Akola, but Advocate Sarda contends that while passing the impugned orders, no such direction has been issued and hence if the appointments are approved or confirmed by the competent authority, the entire challenge which is now pending in Civil Suit No. 176/2008 would be rendered infructuous. He contends that the petitioners were not served with the notice of meeting and also the previous permission of Assistant Charity Commissioner before taking any decision about the appointment was not obtained. If there are any lacunae in the process of effecting appointment, the petitioner can very well point out the same to the trial Court and the trial Court can consider the effect thereof on the 2 appointments as made. Merely because the appointments are approved by the competent authority, that does not mean that right of the petitioner or its contentions are in any way defeated. With these clarifications, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE Rvjalit