IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.13618 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: August 29,2006 Dhanpat ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA PRESENT: Shri D.S.Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the observations made in the appellate order dated June 13, 2006 (Annexure P.9) and various pleas raised by the petitioner in the present petition, we are satisfied that disputed questions of fact are involved for determination, which cannot be determined by this Court, for want of evidence. Consequently, we relegate the petitioner to seek his remedies before the Civil Court, if so advised. Disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Viney Mittal) Judge August 29,2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge