IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16503 of 2010 ANUJ SINGH @ MANOJ SINGH @ Pagalwa Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 17.05.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 25 (1-B)A, 26, 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code is of fire arm injury to none when co-accused Ajay Kumar Yadav, from whom a loaded country made pistol was recovered, has been enlarged on bail in Cr. Misc. No. 40556 of 2009, the recovery from the petitioner being of a live cartridge only. Counsel for the State points out the antecedents of the petitioner in serious matters of Arms Act, 307, 395 IPC. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (Forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM Danapur in Rupaspur PS Case No. 73 of 2009. Both the sureties must be his father and mother respectively whose photograph and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds to be verified through the local police before final acceptance and during which period the petitioner is required to be physically present. In the event of the petitioner not appearing in accordance with law or personal appearance as may be directed the court below shall equally be at liberty to proceed against the sureties also in accordance with law. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)