IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHATTISGARH) w-y^/ ' _.„ -_____^.^^- PETITIONER WRIT PETITION N0. :$-^ OF 2001 UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA : Kapoor Kunwar Patel/w/o Rameshwar Prasad Patel aged 50 years, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat,Kotmi,r/o village Kotmi^Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) Versus : 1. Collector Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhttisgarh) 2. S.D.0.(Revenue),Sakti,District Janjgir Champa(Chhattisgarh) 3. Raxnbhajan, s/o Nankau/aged 45 years, occupation agriculturis,r/o village Kotmi,District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) XI-HC-22 3T[^T'^T l^iw^n^T a:RWHft7T 20e4«2001 F ; .' ^^ ^TFTRT^, ^Tll^^l^ I^TRTg? 3n^?T •CR^ WP 35.l,/2ppl (^l 'HR^ii^^ra^ M 209 '^<s?' 3??^T'^^I^R ^ft^T None for the petiticj Stiri Ranbir Singh^ c^ the respondents 1 and2< Smt» Meera Aasari fc^r respondent noe3^ On 15.3.2001 it was Court amongst other thi-s^a^ e-4^,1 averment is correct and sa^ prevented by the responden^ the proceeding^ the S^D<»0 cozifidence motion proceedi4 presence of such persons a4 must be secured^" The mattl on 20th March 2001. It wasj 2001, on that date too no4 petitioner^ It was expres^ Bhaduri that it might be tb| order passed on 15^3<2001 4 relief as far as the petitij It was however ordered thall shall be filed within a we^k petition shall stand autom^ ch}^M^1"f 'RTH^T ^ fel^t Tf^f^R '^'^rf^rH^IT^T ner^ . ^h. for ^ noted by this follows s"If th© le mexrtoers are no^3 from attending shall see to it that nom [g is held in the id their attendance er was to be listed listed on 22nd March^ ie appeared fcx the ed by Shri Gautam at in view of the iGthing remains as oner is concernede PoF<» axid copies failing which this tically dismissed^ [TT^'^fezf r- ^j^-^T ^ro 3Tr^?r ^TRt^-7 ^^ Nair/-' arr^T'q^^ (^f^^) W^T ^^T^T ^f^T Learned counsel f no^3 submits that no<»co held on 16.3.2001 as schl ^N^frr -^^ ^ ^^ Tfwzi^: "^N^T-^n^T 3r the respondent afidence motion was sdiate d and a resolution was takeii. Shri ]g.aribAie ^ingh appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 ap.so submits that records are available with him which show that no- ^ confldence motion was du?.y held on l6^3e2001 \.<. and itwas passed by a ma ^ority of two-third^ In this view of the^matt^r» it appears that kf/AV ^^A there is nothing ^remains ^ by this Court< for determination The petition is <3|lsmissed as infructuous» Chief Justice GRPRJ—FS/31T—i/2001—50,000. ^/ 4, f T'^^^ ^