IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12841 of 2009 DINESH NANDAN VERMA, SON OF LATE CHATARBHUJ PRASAD VERMA, RESIDENT OF C/o MOHAN NANDAN PRASAD, PARK ROAD, OPPOSITE APARAJITA APARTMENT, P.S. KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA. ---- PETITIOENR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 18.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has challenged the order of cognizance dated 18.10.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner works as a Clerk in the Registration Department was asked to make an enquiry under Section 38(2) of the Indian Registration Act. It is submitted that he made the enquiry and submitted his report in the format. The allegation that he did not correctly fix the value of land which was to be sold is misplaced as it was not the petitioner’s duty to do so. The Court below has taken cognizance on the basis of prima facie material before it. Any other argument that the petitioner wishes to raise can only be done at a later stage in this case. This application is, thus, dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)