1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1660 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 198 OF 2004 Dorothea Leo, Mumbai. Appellant vs. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, 12(2) Mumbai. Respondent Mr.V.S. Handade for the appellant. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ DATED : 10th September 2004 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Nobody appears for the revenue-respondent despite service. There is delay of one day in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal in time. 2. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 2 3. Office is directed to process the appeal and post it for admission as soon as the same is numbered. 4. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)