THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Dated this the 13th day of October 2009. Writ Petition No. 24368 of 2006. Between: Nasreen Gulabi …….Petitioner vs. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Amangal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District and Another. ……..Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 24368 of 2006. ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not conducing survey and demarcating the boundary of the land of an extent of Ac. 50.00 in S.Nos. 260/77/4 and 260/77/4/1 of Kadthal village, Amangal Mandal, Mahabubngar District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to conduct survey of the above land and demarcate the boundary. It is asserted that the petitioner became the owner and possessor of the land of an extent of 50.00 in S.Nos. 260/77/4 and 260/77/4/1 of Kadthal village, Amangal Mandal, Mahabubngar District by virtue of registered gift deeds dt. 15.12.2003 and that as his neighbour raised boundary dispute, the petitioner made an application to the 1st respondent on 12.1.2006 along with challan fee of Rs. 250/- and requested him to conduct survey of his land and the land of his neighbour and demarcate the boundary but no was action was taken. It is further asserted that the petitioner again made another application 17.6.2006 requesting the 1st respondent to survey the lands and demarcate the boundary but no action was taken. The petitioner also made an application to the 2nd respondent requesting him to conduct survey of the lands and also paid challan fee on 14.7.2006. The grievance of the petitioner is that though he paid requisite fee and requested the respondents to conduct survey of the land, the respondents did not respond to his applications and therefore he is before this court for the relief already adverted above. The respondents did not choose to file a counter affidavit though the writ petition was instituted in the year 2006. Since the respondents did not file counter traversing the allegations in the writ petition, the allegations in the writ petition are construed to be true. Having regard to the averments made in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to conduct survey of the land in question and demarcate the boundary, pursuant to the applications said to have been made by the petitioner on 12.1.2006, 17.6.2006 and on14.7.2006 along with requisite challan, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. _________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J. 13.10.2009. Krb. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH. WRIT PETITIONNo. 24368 of 2006. Dated: 13.10.2009.