'•^ ^ •^1"'" ^'^ 1""^GJ>??^ ^.^J Knala Senct "y7 ^ ^-^w y ^ RESPONDENTS 1. IN THBHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR REVIEW PETITION N0. fiO /2011 (Seeking review of the order dated 21.06.11 pas.sed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ petition ( 8) No.400/2008) PETITIONER ^ ^B.P.Khare S/o Late Shri R.P.Khare; Aged about 70 years, Occupation - Estate Manager (Retired), R/o Quarter No.F-7 (Janta) Padmanabhpur, Durg, District - Durg-(C.G.) ' VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Housing, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) C.G.Housing Board, Through Its Commissioner, Shankar Nagar, Raipur- (C.G.) M.P.Housing Board, Through its Commissioner, Paryawas Bhawan, Mother Teresa Marg, Bhopal (M.P.) REVIEW PETITION ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 21.85.11 PASSED BY THIS^HON»BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION (St N0.400/2008, COPY OF ORDER DATED 21.06.1 1 IS ANNEXED AS *P-1' 2. 3. ^^. "", ^ %.' ~ !. ^ [I-HC—78 ^rr^r^ {<vijch ?T8?T -STT^T ssb^icb 'S^T T^l^l<rl^, ^xli-(-l^<o, fs|<r)|-(-)^< *ll*«tl«»*iict» """"""""""""Tl^ 200 ^TT^?T Tf^F (1?^^) ^<TTW ^rf?H ^H^T <=r)i^<fll tTTH^Jf ^f fe^ <H»i^i< '^3tRm'37T^T Review Petiltion No.60/2011 Petitioner V^rsus Respondents B.P. Khare State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. In FHon'ble Shrl Manlindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.1 5.8.2011 After going through th^ review has been sought on flled before the High Court of] withdrawn on 12.3.2007 andi that an order has been ps^ granting liberty to the appropriate forum, it was re\< he had preferred a writ petiti<| Pradesh and the same was dil was discovery of new and im^ revealed by the petitioner therefore, review is being j51edj< Ihamber review petition, it is found fhat t.1ie ground fhat earlier writ petition Madhya Pradesh was dismissed as when the petitioner was informed i^sed on 21.6.2011 by this Court, peti|tioner to file writ petition before tealed by fhe petitioner fhat earlier, j)n before the High C^)urt of Madhya i^missed. It is stated that such a fact ri»ortantpiece of evidence, which was ajft.er dismissal of the writ petition, ^-F"-" XI-HC—78 '3~^r ^ll^lcrl^l, ^Tll^^Ko, [®|<rll^^< ^WWi $hNrai •^200 ^TT^T T^W (li°li^<sl<^T) ^TT^T ^T f^TNT H^T 3TT??T 5t)^|ct» ^»» ^nW^f^T 37T^T -2- In the writ petition filed nowhere disclosed fhat. he h^ withdrawn. It is not the case d^ case came-up for hearing b^ petitioner had no knowledge CM^it<li<flri 'RT^ff ^ fex^ <r3i^i< ^3tRm37T^T )efore fhis Coi.irt, the petitioner has s already filed writ petition before the High Court of Madhya pradesh, which was dismissed as High Court ofMadhya Pradeslji on 12.3.2007. out. In fhe aforesaid circums The review petition is thi pTthe petitioner that on tlie date the fore tliis Court on 21.6.2011, the jof dismissal of his petition by the .tances, no case for review is made refore dismissed. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge <„ 1