IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.20 of 2007 UPENDRA PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.C. to A.A.G. No.8. 7 20.2.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for directing the respondent authorities to prevent the private respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession over the land of the petitioner. Notice was issued to private respondents by order dated 27.4.07. By order dated 29.1.2009 on the prayer of the learned counsel for the private respondents time was granted to them. The case of the petitioner is that the land in question is their purchased land and they have succeeded in various litigation against others in proceeding under B.T. Act as well as ceiling Act and 144 Cr.P.C. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the petitioner, if so advised, may file representation before the S.D.O., Sitamarhi, who after hearing both the parties will ensure due protection to the parties who has documents of title and possession in their favour. It is made clear that if any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the S.D.O., Sitamarhi will dispose of the same within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. 2 With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)