WWW/W ‘ 'WW. 111200 .mm (W) mmm mm f5dm #:si’fmm 03-01 -2005 Shri T.K.Tiwari Learned Ct Heard. )unsel for the petitioner. Sd/— ”Q t 7 DI-ERENDRA MISHRA k ‘ Judge The petitioner has preferred this petition for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to act in a cordance with law since as per the land revenue code they are obiige to pass order of mutation ‘on the instruments used in transfer of th property. However, an information has been given to the petitioner reg rding the execution of transfer deed of V Annexure P-1 but therespondent are not taking any steps which they are otherwise Iegaiiy advised to do. On a specific query counsel for the petitioner Whether any complain I representation was preferred by the petitioner before approaching this Court, the answer was in'nega’tive. Under these circumstanc ' direction to the petitioner to appro supervise the acts of their subordi Ordered accordingly. GRPRJ FS/78 —;»v/200( e—somo. s the petition is disposed of with a ach th‘e higher authorities responsible to tate before approaching this Court.