1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14124/2008 Choudhary Parmaram Godhara T.T. College and ors. Versus The State of Rajasthan and others Date of order ::: December 19, 2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.Sandeep Pathak, for the petitioners Mr.J.M.Saxena, for the State Mr.Sanjay Pareek, for the NCTE Dr.R.K.Sharma, for the University Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of counsel for the petitioners is that the controversy raised in this writ petition of not admitting the candidates below 30% marks in the P.T.E.T. is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Bright Future Teacher Training Vs. State (S.B. C.W.P. No.13038/2008), decided on 12.12.2008, wherein the University Ordinance and other aspects of the matter have also been considered. He further submits that the petitioner Institutions were allowed to participate in the counselling, but still the seats are lying 2 vacant for the aforesaid reason and case of the petitioners stand on better footing than the case Bright Future Teacher Training Vs. State (Supra). Counsel for the respondent-State submits that although qualifying marks have not been prescribed, but still it is open for the State to fix the minimum qualifying marks. I have considered the aforesaid aspect of the matter and am of the view that the controversy raised in the writ petition stands decided in Bright Future Teacher Training Vs. State (Supra), therefore, directions issued by this Court in Bright Future Teacher Training Vs. State (Supra) will also be applied in respect of the vacant seats of the petitioner Institutions. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed. (PREM SHANKER ASOPA) J. गोpa ल