THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.10450 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Syed Khader Mastan, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. At their request the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The action of the respondents in seeking to demolish the temporary structures put up by the petitioner is challenged in this writ petition on several grounds. In view of the undertaking given, on instructions, by Sri Syed Khader Mastan, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner would, on his own accord, remove the structures in question within a period of three months from today, I consider it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition permitting the petitioner to remove the structures within a period of three months from today. Needless to state that, in case the structures are not removed within the aforesaid period of three months, the notice issued under Section 636 of the Act would revive and it would be open to the respondent corporation to take action, in accordance with law, thereafter. It is also made clear that, during this period of three months, the respondent corporation shall not demolish the property in question. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. However, in the circumstances, without costs. Date: 29.04.2010 ___________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR