1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13441 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13442 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13443 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13444 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13445 OF 2008 Office notes, office memoranda of Corum, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s Judge’s orders. [ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.] DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009 1. Heard Smt. R.R. Mane, learned A.G.P. for State. There is delay of 243 days in causing to file Appeal. Though the State tried to explain the 2 delay, however, it is not satisfactory and no sufficient reasons to condone the same. 2. Incidentally, the order under challenge indicate that the enhancement is not disproportionate to the sale instances or the situation of the property. Consequently, respective petitions and the Appeals are dismissed. [ K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE knp/CA13441,etc.08 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11