IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2008 / 24TH ASHADHA 1930 WA.No. 497 of 2008() --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14797/2007 Dated 19/12/2007 .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT NO.1 IN THE W.P. ----------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION (B)DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENNY GERVACIS RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 IN WPC. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SIBY JAMES, S/O.LATE CHACKO VALLIYAMTHADATHIL HOUSE, VENKURINJI, OLAKULAM PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 3. M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 4. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, I.G.SPORTS COMPLEX, I.P.ESTATE N.DELHI-110 002 HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT THE HEALTH CENTRE BUILDING, BANGALORE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, BANGALORE-560 009 REP. BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICER. 5. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION BADADURSHA NAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI-1100 002 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS EDUCATION SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY & HIGHER EDUCATION 128 "C" WING, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 001. BY ADV.SRI. MOHAN JACOB GEORGE FOR R1. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY FOR R2,3 SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI FOR R5 SRI.ABRAHAM THOMAS, CGC FOR R6 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & P.N.RAVINDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- W.A.No.497 OF 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated 15th July, 2008 JUDGMENT Koshy,J . In the statement filed by the appellant dated 28.6.2008, it is stated that the entire post of 2 Readers, 4 Lecturers as sought for by the Department has now been sanctioned with an additional post more in the Lecturer category. Hence, prayer in the writ petition is satisfied by the appellant. The writ petitioner submitted that he is satisfied with the above statement. Therefore, the writ appeal is disposed of accepting the statement filed by the appellant regarding creation of new post as prayed in the writ petition. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE tks