THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 762 of 2008 Amir Hasan S/o Sri Mahmood Hasan ........ Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ......... Respondents Mr. H.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. H.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar, Joshi, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the final report against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned 15/12/2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit final report before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been made in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 31.03.2009 Shiv