IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.9294 OF 2008 1. MUNESH KUMAR MANDAL @ MUNESH MANDAL, SON OF KUSHESHWAR MANDAL 2. SATISH KR. MANDAL @ SATISH MANDAL, SON OF AHESHWAR MANDAL 3. DHARMESH KR. MANDAL @ DHARMESH MANDAL, SON OF KUSHESHWAR MANDAL 4. MANISH KR. MANDAL @ MANISH MANDAL, SON OF KUSHESHWAR MANDAL 5. RAJNISH KUMAR @ RAJNISH MANDAL, SON OF ASHESHWAR MANDAL 6. RUPESH KR. MANDAL @ RUPESH MANDAL, SON OF CHANDRA SHEKHAR MANDAL 7. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJIV MANDAL, SON OF SHIVNATH MANDAL 8. KUSHESHWAR MANDAL, SON OF LATE SUKHADEO MANDAL 9. RANJEET MANDAL, SON OF LAE SAHDEO MANDAL 10. RAM TAHAL MANDAL, SON OF LATE SAHDEO MANDAL 11. AMIT KR. MANDAL @ AMIT MANDAL @ RAJ KUMAR MANDAL, SON OF LATE RAMDEO MANDAL 12. CHUNNILAL PASWAN, SON OF LATE NARAYAN PASWAN, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALAHA, POLICE STATION GAYGHAT, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ………………………………………………………………………PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM KHELAWAN SAFI, SON OF LATE CHULHAI SAFI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALAHA, POLICE STATION GAYGHAT, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ………………………………………………………………….OPPOSITE PARTIES ******** 2 11/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners have challenged the order taking cognizance passed in Complaint Case No. 2058 of 2006 by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur. The Court below has taken into account the complaint petition and the evidence of PWs 1, 2, 3 and 4 who have come forth to support the complaint and 2 passed the order taking cognizance. I do not find any illegality in the order impugned. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)