IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-44644 of 2007 (O&M) Decided on : 04.11.2008 Jagjit Singh ...Petitioner. VERSUS Bant Singh ....Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Munish Raj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Mohinder, Advocate for the respondent. AJAI LAMBA J.(ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the complaint No.9 dated 11.03.1999 (Annexure P-1) titled as “Bant Singh Vs. Harnek Singh and others, under Section 465, 420, 467, 471, 474, 120-B IPC pending before the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sunam. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-complainant has pointed out that if the sequence of events is noticed, it would be evident that the petition is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed. Learned counsel contends that after considering the complaint, it was dismissed by the Magistrate vide order 02.06.2000 (Annexure P-2). Aggrieved by the order of dismissal, the complainant preferred the Crl. Misc. No.M-44644 of 2007 (O&M) -2- criminal revision in the court of sessions which has been allowed vide order dated 20.04.2001 (Annexure P-4). After considering the legal issues as also the facts, it has been held that the order passed by the trial Magistrate vide order dated 02.06.2000 was perverse and was set aside, the trial court had been directed to make further inquiry into the complaint and proceed in accordance with law. Aggrieved by the order, the accused/petitioner approached this Court by way of filing Criminal Revision No.1038 of 2001 and Criminal Revision No.1006 of 2001. The revision petitions have been dismissed vide common order dated 31.03.2006 (Annexure P-6). Order dated 20.04.2001 passed by the court of sessions has been upheld. As a consequence of the order passed by the revisional court, the trial Magistrate considering the issue afresh and vide the impugned order dated 15.06.2007 (Annexure P-7) has summoned the accused including the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has pointed out that against the order of summoning dated 15.06.2007 on the one side, the present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, on the other side a criminal revision had been carried before the court of sessions. The court of sessions has already dismissed the revision petition filed on behalf of the accused. It seems that the issues raised in this petition have already been considered by this court while dealing with Criminal Revision No.1038 of 2001 and Criminal Revision No.1006 of 2001 decided on 31.03.2006 vide order Annexure P-6. It was in accordance with order passed by this court, Crl. Misc. No.M-44644 of 2007 (O&M) -3- that the impugned order of summoning has been passed. The summoning order was challenged by way of criminal revision before the court of sessions, which also has been dismissed. In view of the above, there is no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. November 04, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) ashish JUDGE