1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 184 OF 2010 (In Cri. Appln. No. 573/06) Bapurao Ramchandra Gaurkar v. The State of Mah. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. M.A. Bapat Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.S. Sonare, A.P.P. for the Respondent. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 3 rd MARCH,_2010. Mr.Bapat, learned counsel for the applicant on this application states that the statement made by him that in the departmental enquiry the applicant was found guilty on the basis of confession is wrong as recorded in para 2 of the judgment dated 29.1.2010. According to him, as a matter of fact, the departmental enquiry was completed but due to pendency of criminal case before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli, no final order was passed. In view of this position, correction be made in para 2 of the judgment by substituting the following sentence in place of last four lines of para 2 of the judgment- 2 “According to Mr.Bapat, learned counsel for the applicant, departmental enquiry against the applicant was completed but the same was kept in abeyance due to pendency of criminal case in question before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gadchiroli.” It is clarified that the department is now entitled to pronounce the result of departmental enquiry or continue and complete the same and pronounce the result thereof within three months from today. State to act on the copy of this order. JUDGE /TA/ 3