IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3611 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR Versus SRI P.C.PATI AND ANOTHER. ----------- 3. 25.2.2011. Heard Mr. Uma Kant Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. R.S.Pradhan, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Provident Fund Department and Mr. Alok Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel to AAG-2 for the State. The writ petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of by order dated 29.1.2010 with liberty to raise his claim for payment of pension before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna and who was under a duty to consider and decide the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation so filed on behalf of the petitioner. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the department enclosing a copy of the order dated 03.09.2010 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Patna rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the Regional 2 Provident Fund Commissioner, in purported compliance of the directions of this Court, is in fact identical to the order which was subject matter of the writ proceeding and thus, the Regional provident Fund Commissioner did nothing except reiterating the earlier position and has ignored the observation of this court made in the order which is the subject matter of the present proceeding. Be that as it may, as the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner has passed the order as per the direction of this Court passed in the writ proceedings, nothing survives in the present application and the same is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order by filing an appropriate application before the appropriate forum. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)