Cg? mm mga‘ Pg} N0. @ / IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NOZZgZOF 2003: Dr. A.R.Karoriy?S/o Shri N. L. Karoriya, aged about 40 years, Occupation - Govt. Service presently working as Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Pendra Road, District — Biiaspur (C.G.) PETITIONER Permanent R/o Viilage-Madhen - Ambah, Kapura, Tahsii District — Murena (M.P.) weavy6‘( VERSUS V 5 RESPONDENTS / :1. Union of India, Through: the Secretary,Ministry of the Personnel and Public Grievances and Pension (State r’r’f§' Re-organization) Government of lndia, New—Delhi. Keys g Director, State Re-organization (Department of Personnel & Training) Government of lndia, New-Delhi. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through : The Secretary, General Administration Depart- ment, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal ’y THAKUR VIJAV SINGH Asst. Solicitor General 0f WM HighComcampus.Bilasnuri¢.G.l cHHAmscAnH at?“ 00““ ' /“4. (M.P.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through . The Secretary, General Administration Depart -ment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 5. The Director, Directorate of Health Services, Chhattisgarh Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawfan: Raipur (C.G.) @ Pve N0. / (2) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOIQ THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS. ..M>£;.E.~..2;3.2, 1mm mnw mzoog mammafgEla) , msywm. . 32Hmam ' ’ Emmmawéai WW§%W aiwma )eputy State] mspondents No. 2 85 5 15.6.2005 Shri Bhupendra Singh, Shri G.K. Beriwal, I Ms, Shaxmila Singhaj India] fespondent No. 1. Heard both the counsel. Leanled counsel for petitioner who is working as Contra, Pendra Road, Distn'c Stats of Madhya Prade$h vid R2) under Section 68 of The has been allocated to ,Distn' that even after passing of a1". he has; not been relieved sc Madhya Pradesh‘ It ie an admitted p0 working as Medical Onicer, P has been allocateti to the St date (23.10.2002). It is” a petitioner has not been reh'ew Learneii counsel for tl situated 5 doctors who are a Pradesh were -directed to Chhattisgarh vide. order (lat counsel for the petitioner. Advocate General for the on advance copy. ,' Standing Counsel for Union of the petitioner submits that the Medical Oficer in Primary Health t Bilaspur, has been allocated to the e order dated 23.10.2002 (Annexure MP. Reorganisation Act 2000. He 3t Jhabua. It is further submitted . order for allocation on 23.10.2002, x far for proceeding to the State of sition that the petitioner, who is H.C. Pendra Road, District Bilaspur, ate of Madhva Pradesh on the said 1lso an admitted position that the ed so far. le petitioner submits that similarly lso allocated to the State of Madhya be relieved from the State of :d 17.12.2003 passed in bunch of S P/FS/2005 » 20,000 am arm‘smnw H 311331 w.(W) 'mmvfga mat V7,“ WW§MW $Wsné21 mmni$ .I.I.I pt... nu.: ..1.1. 111200 writ petitions ( five pCtitions) has bean f1l€d as Annexurt petitioner also refers to the passed in Writ petition No. 4 said order, the petitioner of Tl to be relieved in order to e State of Madhva Pradesh. Lealned counsel for tht case of the present petitioner decisione rendered by this Co placed person who has bee Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for i} India do: . not dispute this f counsel for fhe petitioner. Hc in a position to ”state as to W1 in i‘avour of the petitioner is s Having considered the and particularly considering ‘ persons, who have. been allo( have been relieved by the S1 present to be a tit case in petitioner to join his duties : Madhya Pradesh, should be } by this Court. A copy of this order a P—ll. Learned counsel for the order 2.5.2005 which has’been 42/ 2004 by this Court and by the Le said Writ petition is also directed nable him to join his duties in the z petitioner further submits that the is squarely covered with the above 2 urt as the petitioner is also similarly n finally allocated to the State of 1e State and counsel for Union of actual position, set forth by learned iwever, they submit that they are not lether the order of allocation passed till existing or not facts and circumstances of the case he fact that Various similarly placed ated to the State of Madhya Pradesh ate of Chhattisgarh, I consider that which a direction for relieving the it his allocated place in the State of )assed. SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 W,§; WWW qf$ 0 Wm ' W20 maTW<W> mmm % H mmm 5'“3“?WWEW aa‘ mat ¢3~ ‘‘W§W Accordingly e patiti is allow-a1. It is direcd that if the order allocatio issued in our of t petitioer by which he has be allocated to t State of adhya rades i$ still _ existing, then h shll be reve by the respondents in order to enable im to oin his duties the State Madhya iadesh. s isp is W W. 180 i. It i made clear that if he order of allocaon is not exyg or is altered or a chang taken place betwee Ls rder passed by this Cou shall he no foe. e k , th om te of n fav he n en he M Ph e a he& h j :n of P The petition i nnally dosed of. _ In View of th order, A. No. 4358f2005 and M.P.No. 0/ 2005 stand disposed o s t ti itin ny em in n thi o re shall b no'ord as to costs in this petition. The e ers Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Juge J é SP/FS/2805 — 20,000 I Lyck: §g§f n \ I 7 w.w q rt av rc d r