SL^n.?'^-''; y fna'"^?1^.?^' ^:^' <&Iii':^.^^.^. Nlj":^ ^^./ ^) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISINO. S130 /2009 PETITIONER »t0'' ^...<^" .^s^ ;'xSy ^••^""..- ''^^...•••" ^' y-~ Smt. Karuna Dongre, W/o Shri Sanjay Dongre, aged about 44 years, working as Upper Division Teacher/ Superintendent, Pre- Metric Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatrawas, Dongargarh Block - Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) R/o Kedarbadi, Ward No.3, Khairagarh Road, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^"3>. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Adim Jati tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Coniraissioner, Adim Jati tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) 'i^^ Era ^^ i:^%l liii ^^ fei^ y:( {"T°~1 i' ::1 ! / 5. The Assistarit Coinmissioner, Aadiwasi Vikas, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / 6. Smt Urmila Bhoyar, W/o Devi Prasad Bhoyar aged about 44 years, R/o Village Charbhatha Mohanpur, Block Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ll^l^i-l,- "^^sa^E 3-.^w^^a?3^^^; -^..Y^LA^4J^7A^: ^^ %^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S} No. 5190 of2009 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Karuna Dongre. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Otfiers. WRTT PETnTON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aeiuhotri. J. Pres^nt: Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 to3 & 5 ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 11th day of September, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits atthis stage and prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his rq)resentation as early as possible. Ms. Jam, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 and 5 submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a fresh representation within a period of one week, the same shall be considered and decided within a liirther period oftwo weeks, in accordance with law. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordmgly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt