1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2008 Along with Cross Objection (ST) No.5551 of 2008 Mrs Rohini Nitin Kothari .. Appellant Vs Mr Nitin Damodar Kothari .. Respondent Mr. Nitin P Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant. Mrs Geeta Mulekar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & R.Y.GANOO,JJ. DATE : 15/02/2010. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably settled their all disputes and they have tendered Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates on record. Parties are present in the court. They confirm that they have read and understood the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Counsel for the parties state that the parties have already acted upon most of the terms of the Consent Terms, except quashing of a Criminal Case, namely, RCC No.470 of T 2 2005 pending in the Court of JMFC, Pune, as provided for in paragraph no.9 of the Consent Terms. The appellant-wife undertakes to give consent for quashing of the said complaint. Statements made and undertakings given by the parties in the Consent Terms are accepted. Consequently, the Judgment and decree dated 4.12.2007 of the Family Court passed in P.A. No. 626 of 2004 is quashed and set aside and is substituted by the order in terms of the Consent Terms. The marriage of the appellant and the respondent accordingly stand dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent, as provided under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955. The Family Court Appeal and the Cross-objections are disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Decree be drawn accordingly. (R.Y.Ganoo,J.) (D. B. Bhosale, J.)