m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH Civil Revision No. ^ | /2004 Anamika Singh, D/o- Siirendra Smgh, Aged abou^fl-yeS:s, R/o- Ked^ur, P.S. Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. •B ..- ^..' .-. '''.''• ^"<<!r*k':.i Mnff.C 3:3S !'iS Appellant VERSUS i i •! Vinod Kumar Panda, S/o- Baikunthnath Panda, Rifo-Navapara(Near Nehm Hostel), Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. • Alphons Toppo, S/o-Jahonious Toppo, Aged about 25 years, Owner ofthe Vehicle, R/o- Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, ^ .'^ Chhattisgarh. <^ A*?.^ ^^^ ^ ^fy %> <A^ ^ '€;y ^^^ in"* vy <?' 3. Unitedlndia Insurance Co. Ltd., Through-Manager, Branch OfGce Near Ram Mandir, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. Non-Appellant II^C CFVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 1T5 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE I11 Sei.l'i-CTiS XI-HC-22 11;;-; sn^rw f^resn^r Bi: WdficT stilRiB .«- f' ];1 i'-1 .^&^ ^ y 3^'SIPTRCT, ®Tfl<l'l6,Rlcliyy .^,.....G,ft<A^ IIHPTTShXKh '200 R*^ sn^rs^nwBfe 16/02a005 ShriPankajShrivastava, The instant Civil Revlsiort is aggrieved by th®impugnect (ounselfbr tte applwant. fiasbaenpreferredteyUwapplteantashe loreter dated 06/04S004, by whteh the applteaUon of the applicanyds| directBd to be deposMad in lix«l| ftom25/a2Q004to has bsen ftir the period offlveyeai'&i.e. rejected. Leamedcounselforlhea^plieantsubmitsttatat theapplicatton i.e. on 29/09/20C|1, fte age <rf the applicantwaashown as 14 years and nowttie appltean( has attained majority. L«ffnedi applicant had also aroiexed according to which the date flndii^ of the Court betow ttiat contraryto materiat availableon of theapplication, theage ofth^ the applicant is aged 18yeare findingofttietrialcourtis contra appBcant be rdeased along wlttj ^(^\ -f-. <!bwl<-t41-i tiitidTfffei<'1 <Ri<<ii< ^srf^rsn^r Imant for retease of amount wrtiich is depestt aeeount of ttie appliranlfeteimant has comptetedlhe age of 18 years and sounsd forlhe apptteart submtls that the leertified copy vida Ahnaaire A@ and |of bhth of the applteant te shown as 10/06/1984. Leamed counsel f|»rthe apptteant lurther submite that the fhe appHcant has not attained majority is Irecorct. 1 have heard teamedcou^iselfortheappelfant. From the documente on i|eeord and ttre faet ttKrt attheUms offning applieant Is shown as 14 yBare and now |and as such he aUained nKdorily and the lytottiffmaterialavailabl&onrecord: In the above cifBumstorlces; fte applteatten te dtowed and tt is direeted that the amount depo|stted In the flxed depo^t account of th» intere^. 'TtL.^iWm^ ^- --1 Sd/- _. , iMistea Dbu-enAia^u'" judge