V. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLEMR.SATISHK.AGNIHOTRI.J, WRIT PETITION fS) No. 1679 of2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Subha Agniotri W/o Shri Bharat Agniotri, Aged about 54 years, R/o Indra vihar Sarkanda Bilaspur, (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh. Through:- J? D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. Director of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Edueation officer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER i-r^ (Passed on 22" ofMarch, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and questioD of law involved in the preseat writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96},which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in tenns of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whelher Ifae petitioner has acquired M.Ed. Examinatioa Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit w~