IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NO.3483 OF 2010. Date:20.04.2010 Between:- S.Ramanachari ..Petitioner/Accused And Katragadda Sridhar and another .. Respondents ORDER:- The petitioner is accused of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C.No.783 of 2008 on the file of Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. The cheque was issued in the name of the second respondent/defacto complainant for Rs.1,00,000/- and when it was presented for encashment, the cheque was dishonoured on the ground that account was closed. 2. It is contention of the petitioner that there are business transactions between the petitioner and the first respondent and that in connection with those transactions, the petitioner gave two blank cheques to the first respondent as security and that disputes arose between the parties not in respect of business transactions but in connection with a raid by the Metrology Department on the petitioner’s shop and that therefore, taking advantage of blank signed cheques available with the first respondent, the first respondent pressed one of the cheques into service. It is further contended that no person will give a cheque after closure of the bank account and that it suggests that blank cheques were issued previously and not on the date mentioned in the cheque. 3. All the contentions raised by the petitioner are based on disputed questions of fact. They have to be appreciated and decided by the trial Court after recording evidence of both the parties. This Court, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., cannot go into those questions and decide them in this petition. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 20th April 2010 AMD