IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1710 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision:14.07.2010 Som Dutt ..Petitioner Versus Sunder Lal .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG a). Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? b). To be referred to the Reporters or not ? c). Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present:- Mr.Ravi Badyal, Advocate for the petitioner. RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. (ORAL) This is defendant's (petitioner herein) revision petition challenging the order dated 02.02.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite the fact that issues have been framed, till date no evidence has been recorded on behalf of the plaintiff-respondent. Keeping in view the aforesaid fact, this revision petition is disposed of with the observations that the petitioner is at liberty to take all the objections as raised in this application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC before learned Trial Court in appropriate proceedings. Disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) July 14, 2010 JUDGE Sukhpreet