BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14581 of 2011 DR. CHELLA BASKAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIVALAMVANDHANALLUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.MAYIL VAGANA RAJENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in for offences under Sections 420 IPC, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the petitioner, one Kandaleela has preferred a complaint in respect of some property dispute and based on the same, the petitioner is being harassed. The petitioner is a Government Doctor by profession. According to him, the respondent harassed the petitioner to force him, to reconvey the property to the said woman, namely, Kandaleela. Therefore, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, apprehension of arrest is genuine. 3. But the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that no such complaint from Kandaleela is pending on the file of the respondent and the petitioner is not wanted for arrest. The said statement is recorded. 4. In my considered opinion, when there is no apprehension of arrest, because there is not even any petition pending on the file of the respondent police, question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise. At the same time, it is made clear that after the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dismissal of this petition, the respondent should not indulge in any type of harassment to the petitioner in respect of the so called property dispute between Kandaleela and the petitioner. If any such harassment is made, the same would be viewed seriously. In view of the above observation, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- 10/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIVALAMVANDHANALLUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT +1. CC to M/S. C.MAYIL VAGANA RAJENDRAN Advocate SR.No.38916 ssk/15.11.2011 /4c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14581 of 2011 Date :10/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/