THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3940 OF 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the order, dated 04.08.2010 passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, in I.A.No.307 of 2010 in I.A.No.437 of 2009 in O.S.No.397 of 2007. I.A.No.437 of 2009 was filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to send the disputed pronote to hand-writing expert and the same was allowed with a condition to deposit expert’s fee within fifteen days along with material to compare the signatures. Since the same was not complied within the time stipulated, the petition was dismissed. Seeking to restore the said petition, I.A.No.307 of 2010 was filed. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the father of the petitioner was 82 years old. His condition was very serious and later he died and on account of that the petitioner could not comply with the order passed in I.A.No.437 of 2009. The learned trial Judge dismissed the I.A. vide impugned order. In the affidavit filed in support of the stay petition, which was filed along with the revision, it is mentioned that the father of the petitioner died on account of continuous ill health. Thus, the fact that the father of the petitioner was sick and later died cannot be disputed. Now, admitting the revision and giving notice to respondent inviting him to contest the revision petition would consume considerable time and the intention of the petitioner probably to delay the proceedings to some extent would be served. Even on contest, unless the fact that the father of the petitioner died is incorrect, there may not be any possibility of passing any different order, that is of allowing the CRP and perhaps the petitioner most likely would not have gone to the extent of stating that his father died, in case, it is incorrect. Considering these circumstances, the civil revision petition is allowed and 15 days time is granted to the petitioner from today for complying with the order passed in I.A.No.437 of 2009 dated 30.12.2009, petitioner shall deposit the expenditure for sending the material for expert and file his signatures of the relevant period as directed by the Court below in the impugned order. This order shall be communicated to the Court below forthwith and no extension of time beyond 15 days for compliance would be granted. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. 14th September 2010 Note: Issue copy by tomorrow. B/o. Rns