THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.3476 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is preferred against the docket order dated 24.11.2008 in I.A. No.1063 of 2008 in O.S.No.83 of 2002 on the file of VII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the revision petitioners- defendant Nos.4 and 5 filed the above I.A. for reopening of the matter to adduce their evidence. On 30.09.2008, the trial court allowed the I.A. on costs of Rs.500/- and directed the petitioners to complete the evidence on or before 21.10.2008. Accordingly, the petitioners paid the costs of Rs.500/- to the plaintiff on 15.10.2008, but they did not adduce the evidence in spite of giving opportunity beyond 21.10.2008. Ultimately, the I.A. was dismissed. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the first respondent and perused the record. It is seen that the trial court has allowed the I.A. on 30.09.2008 on costs of Rs.500/-and directed the petitioners to complete the evidence on or before 21.10.2008, but the petitioners did not adduce their evidence as directed by the trial court and the trial court further extended the time up to 29.10.2008 to adduce their evidence. Even then also, the petitioners failed to adduce the evidence on their behalf. Further, though the matter was adjourned from to time thereafter, the petitioners did not avail the opportunity. 4. In the circumstances, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order so as to call for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J 15.10.2009 Note: C.C. in two days. Stp