S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9838/2008 Smt. Anjana Dadhich Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 11.12.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr. Shyam Toshniwal, for the respondents. ... The petitioner faced process of selection to be considered for appointment as Prabodhak under Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008. She was placed in the select list, however, the posting to her was withheld due to break in service. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that whatever break in service that is for the reasons beyond control of the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents as to why this petition for writ be not admitted. Sh. Shyam Toshniwal, learned Assistant to Sh. A.K. Rajwanshy, Addl. Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. The controversy involved in this petition is no more res integra in view of the judgment of this Court in Smt. Vishnu Kunwar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., SBCivil Writ Petition NO.8796/2008, decided on 21.11.2008. Accordingly, this petition for writ is also allowed in the terms of the judgment referred above. The respondents are directed to consider the period consumed by the petitioner in undergoing training necessary for appointment as Prabodhak, the period of leave sanctioned or the leave availed for the reasons beyond control as part of teaching experience acquired. The period aforesaid is also not required to be considered as break in service. As such, the respondents should act expeditiously to give effect to the select list relating to the petitioner and also relating to the persons similarly situated, as far as possible within a period of one and half month from today by giving appointment to her, if she is otherwise eligible. It shall be open for the respondents to demand original documents and other relevant facts from the petitioner to get satisfied about her claim for the period relating to teaching experience and leave in question. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '