THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 899 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 18.08.2009, passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 604 of 2009 in O.S. No. 2409 of 2006, filed by the petitioner praying to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to demarcate the extent and boundaries of Plot No. 15 of the petitioner and Plot Nos. 16 and 14/A of the respondent as per the Gram Panchayat layout with the assistance of Mandal Surveyor. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. Though the petitioner contends that respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have encroached into his plot by extending the boundaries of their plots, and therefore, it is necessary that an Advocate Commissioner should be appointed to demarcate the extent and boundaries of her plot as well as that of respondents, the fact remains, the petitioner filed the present application after closure of evidence on her behalf and after D.W.1 filed affidavit-in-lieu of chief. This apart, the petitioner did not file the document, namely the approved layout of the Gram Panchayat, with reference to which she sought identification of the extent and boundaries of her plot as well as that of respondents. In the absence of approved layout of the Gram Panchayat, filed by the petitioner, which was necessary to identify the suit schedule property and that of the respondents with metes and bounds, the Court below refused to appoint Advocate Commissioner to demarcate the extent and boundaries of the plot of the petitioner as well as that of the respondents, and no interference is called for therewith, and more so when, the stage at which the application filed by the petitioner is allowed, it would amount to permitting the Advocate Commissioner to collect evidence on her behalf, which course is not permitted under law. In the above view of the matter, this Court finds no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in the C.R.P., and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 17th March, 2010. KSR