1 C.A.NOS.2641 & 2642/09. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2641 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.4388 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2642 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.4386 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.61 OF 1992. 1) Pathan Khan s/o Bale Khan-died-L.Rs. 1-A) Hashmat Beed w/o Pathan & others. ...Applicants. VERSUS 1) Osman Khan s/o Ali Khan-died-L.Rs. 1A) Hayatbee s/o Osman Pathan and others. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Nitin K.Choudhari, Advocate for the applicants in both the applications. 2 C.A.NOS.2641 & 2642/09. Mr.Uday D.Dalvi, Advocate h/f Mr.M.G.Mustafa, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1A to 1G, 2 & 3 in both the applications. Mr.D.R.Irale, Patil Advocate for respondent No. 1C, 1D & 1E in both the applications. .... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 7th August, 2009. COURT’S ORDER: 1. Heard. 2. Both the Civil Applications deserves to be allowed mainly because the respondents have not filed any reply to oppose the applications. Both Civil Applications are allowed as prayed for. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp