HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6283 of 2009 DATE:07.04.2010 Between: K. Ramachary … Petitioner And K. Satyanarayana … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6283 of 2009 ORDER: The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S.No.71 of 2009 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, is the petitioner herein. This revision is directed against the order dated 01.12.2009 in C.M.A.No.8 of 2009 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy, dismissing the said appeal, while confirming the order dated 16.07.2009 made in I.A.No.112 of 2009 in the suit. 2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner herein filed the above suit against the respondent herein for recovery of possession of the suit schedule house. Along with the suit, he also filed an application in I.A.No.112 of 2009 seeking temporary injunction. Though the court below passed an order of status-quo initially i.e. on 23.04.2009, subsequently, on a careful consideration of both oral and documentary evidence, it dismissed the I.A. and vacated the order of status-quo, by an order dated 16.07.2009. Challenging the said order, the petitioner preferred C.M.A.No.8 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy and the appeal was dismissed on 01.12.2009. The same is questioned in this appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner continues to be in possession of the suit schedule house and under the guise of the impugned orders, the respondent is threatening the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent opposed the same. 4. In both the courts below, the petitioner was unsuccessful. The record discloses that the order of status-quo granted by the court below on 23.04.2009 was vacated on 16.07.2009 and in C.M.A.No.8 of 2009 there was no interim order. It appears that the petitioner is not in possession of the property in question. 5. In the light of the above, and as it is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that both the parties may be directed to maintain status-quo till disposal of the suit, this Court is of the view that the civil revision petition can be disposed of with a direction to the lower court. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the lower court to decide the suit in O.S.No.71 of 2009 at the earliest, preferably, within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Both the parties are hereby directed to maintain status-quo subsisting as on today, till the disposal of the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 7th April, 2010 cbs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6283 of 2009 (Disposed of ) 7th April, 2010 CBS