:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3000 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3000 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3000 OF 2006 Y.K. Ghare .....Petitioners. vs. Shri Ananda Waghu Ghare and anr. .....Respondents. V.G. Muzumdar for the petitioners. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard both the sides. 2. Perused the order passed by the appellate court. It has been found that there is sufficient evidence of partition and therefore the appellate court has allowed the :2: application Exhibit 5 and granted temporary injunction. No interference is called for. At this stage learned counsel submitted that the Trial Court be directed to expedite the hearing of the suit. Therefore the trial court is directed to dispose off the suit as early as possible within a period of one year from the date of the receipt of the order. *********