BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14548 of 2011 1 GUL MOHAMED 2 HABIBA BEEVI 3 A. RABIYA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 to 4 Vs STATE THRO THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN P.S, MADURAI TOWN CR NO. 23/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for offences under Sections 498(A), 406 of I.P.C. in Crime No.23 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners have come up with this petition, seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the petitioners are the father-in-law, mother-n-law and sister-in-law respectively, of the de-facto complainant. The first accused is the husband of the de-facto complainant. The marriage between the first accused and the de-facto complainant was celebrated on 25.04.2010. It is alleged that the first accused sold away the gold jewels belonged to the de-facto complainant and also harassed her, demanding dowry. So far as these petitioners are concerned, it is alleged that they joined with the first accused in harassing the de-facto complainant. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would deny all the above allegations. He would submit that the first petitioner is aged 61 years, the second petitioner is aged 60 years. The third petitioner has already been given in marriage somewhere else. 4. I have considered the above submissions. 5. Having regard to the above said facts and the fact that there are no specific overt act attributed against these petitioners and all other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but with conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and the second and third petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 10/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II MADURAI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI TOWN +1. CC to M/S. A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate SR.No.38933 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14548 of 2011 Date :10/11/2011 SMA/12.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/