IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 8 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- PEC LIMITED - THRO' SEAN PALHA Versus CAPT AMIRAS STYLIANOS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: M/S THAKKAR ASSOC. for the Petitioner. NOTICE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 1-2 NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 3 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 4-5 Mr.R.M. Chauhan, Assistant GOVERNMENT PLEADER, for Respondent No. 6 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 11/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard Mr.Dagli and Mr.R.M. Chauhan, learned AGP, for the State. By the impugned order, the trial court has come to the conclusion that since the plaintiff has not paid the entire court fee, there was no question of refunding the court fee. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that, subsequently, he has paid the court fee. If that be so, the petitioner may again apply to the trial court for refund of the court fees. If any such application is made, the trial court is directed to decide the same on its own merits, and in accordance with law. Subject to what is stated above, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of. 11th March, 2004 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) **** (apj)