IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-01-2010 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.544 of 2006 D.Sivakolundu .. Petitioner Versus 1.The District Collector (RDD) Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. 2.Tmt.J.Tamilarasi .. Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent herein in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.23223/97 PA4, dated 28.9.2005 and the impugned seniority list in RC.PA4/23223/97, dated 28.9.2005, quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and forthwith direct the first respondent to fix the seniority of the petitioner in the category of Junior Assistant, Assistant and Extension Officer above the name of J.Tamilarasi the second respondent herein after taking into account of the petitioner date of birth is 11.2.54 and age and consequently given promotion to the petitioner, as Deputy Block Development Officer, with all monetary and other attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja For Respondents: Mr.R.Murali Government Advocate (R1) Mr.L.Chandra Kumar (R2) O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.10.2005, is directed to be disposed of by the first respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.10.2005, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the second respondent, as well as to the other persons concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the respondent a copy of the representation, dated 23.10.2005, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To The District Collector (RDD) Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. 1 cc To Mr.K.Raja, Advocate, SR.1163 1 cc To Mr.L.Chandrakumar, Advocate, SR.1025 W.P.No.544 of 2006 DM(CO) sra 19.01.2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/