[ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1676 of2007 RESPONDENTS Smt. Anjli Tiwari, W/o Shri Aditya Tiwari, Aged about Jabdapara Sarkanda Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through:- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education officer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/'respondents. (Passed on 22nd ofMarch, 2007) <•" Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mmucipal Corporation, Durg and anotiier {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of Vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learaed counsel appearing for the respondente does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in tenns of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs, Municipal Corporation, Durg and anolher (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired M.Ed. Examination Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Armt