IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3592 of 2009 SMT.KARUNA KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 11/11/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of termination from the post of Angan Bari Sevika issued by the Child Development Programme Officer on 20.5.2008 in pursuance of the orders of the Director, I.C.D.S. dated 28.4.2008. It appears that the petitioner has represented against the same before the Director, I.C.D.S., as apparent from annexure-7. Learned counsel for the State raises the objection that though the writ petition avers that the order of termination was in violation of Principles of Natural Justice no such ground has been taken in the representation filed before the Director, I.C.D.S. On the contrary, the representation states that the cancellation has been done after inspection of the petitioners centre. It does not appear to be her case in the representation that she was not present when the inspection was done. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits 2 that he proposes to file additional papers before the Director, I.C.D.S. in support of the claim that the school inspection was done behind her back and then representation may be considered in that light. The writ petition is disposed in aforesaid terms to examine the matter if the petitioner satisfies him that the order of termination was in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and that the petitioner has an adequate explanation to offer, to the satisfaction of the Authority. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)