IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. (s1 N05§1Ll OF 2011 /, Pradeep Sahu S/o Late Bodhram Sahu, aged about 47 years, R/o Kashi Nagar, Korba, District Korba (C.G.). PETITIONER VERSUS :- 1./ State of Chhattisgarh, through Director, Department of Employment and Training, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). / 2. Collector, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 3‘”. Principal, Balak I.T.I., Korba, District Korba (C.G.). RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ”I, w mm « w x » \ m mm mmWWm 3a WW,m, W WWI/.mywg7éygé 31$! W (Wjaiu) WWW WWW mmm WW WW #aa‘mm ISB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra; Mohan Shrivastava, J.[ 30.9.2011 Shri Ravish Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State, on advance copy. n Heard on admission. ' The gievance, as setout ‘y the petitioner in this petition, is, that even though the petition r was granted regular pay—scale after completion of 3 years of ervice vide order dated 29.7.2003 (Annexure P—2) of the Collect r, Korba and his pay was fixed w.e.f. the due date on 18.9.20 3, after 2003, the petitioner was not being granted pay in the pay-scale along with increments. of period hem 2003 to 2006, I increments have not been added to his the then existing pay- scale which he was drawing. On 9.2.2011 again, a memo was from 2006 onwards, in resp XI-HC—78 3E WWW, $9?i E‘I$, WEI W WWW ammm issued from the ofiice of petitioner was entitled to pa any breakyfmmacthe date he and the pay fixation is not pro r. e Collector, Korba for taking _3appropriate;step:s and paymen of pending dues. e petitioner submits that the ent of regular increment without s been g‘anted regular pay-scale counsel for the petitioner, consider petitioner’s claim regard to pay fixation of the issued by the Collector on 9.2.2011 (Annexure P-IO). 1 The necessary decision s within a period of 3 months this order. Taking into consideratio the submissions made by learned e respondent No.3 is directed to d pass appropriate orders with titioner in the light of the order 11.102010 (Amiexure P—7) and hould be taken by respondent No.3 d‘om the date of receipt of copy of With the aforesaid observations, the petition is finally disposed of. Sd/-’ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Wm H‘LwO m&¥rm(a§iaa§a) mmm WW WW _&, $3ifmm