1 ao366.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 366 OF 2011 WITH Civil Application No. 501 of 2011 in AO 366 of 2011 Mrs. Pushpadevi Sarjerao Jadhav & ors. ....Appellants v/s. Mr. Sagar Nathamal Oswal ....Respondent Mr. Venkatesh A. Shastry for the appellant. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 18th October, 2011 PC: In a suit presented in the year 2009, initially an application exhibit 5 was presented seeking an interim injunction against the defendants. However, the said application was not pressed. According to the plaintiffs there was disturbance to the possession of the plaintiff at the hands of the defendant no.1, therefore, she again moved an application in the year 2010 seeking an order of ad-interim injunction against defendants. The application has been rejected by an order dated 5th January, 2011. It is not disputed that since the date of presentation of suit since 2009 till 2011, there is no interim injunction operating against the defendants and an application presented in the year 2010 by the plaintiff has been rejected by the trial Court by an order dated 5th January, 2011. 2. In these peculiar facts and circumstances, ends of justice would be met if the trial Court is directed to decide the pending suit expeditiously. Appeal from Order stands dismissed. The trial Court is directed to decide Special Civil Suit No. 13/2009 as expeditiously as possible preferably within nine months from 2 ao366.11.sxw today. 3. In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J)