IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1657 of 2011 Indira Enclave Residents Welfare Association, Sector 21-D, Faridabad Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Surinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is a society formed privately and has approached this court seeking to restrain respondent No.5 from carrying out construction. Grievance is that respondent No.5 is carrying out illegal construction. Reference is made to the order passed in earlier writ petition, where restraint order of this nature was passed. How the construction is illegal and how the petitioner would be entitled to maintain a writ petition would be a question. It is also not made clear as to why the petitioner cannot invoke the alternative remedy, which would be equally efficacious. The petitioner- Association has also filed a representation with the Government, which can effectively interfere in case any unauthorised or illegal construction is being carried out. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in the writ petition at this stage. The petitioner-Association may have its alternative remedy of filing a civil suit or pursuing their representation. The writ petition is dismissed. January 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE