CM No.2723-C-2010 and -1- RSA No.4695 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.2723-C-2010 and RSA No.4695 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 04.03.2010 **** Rakesh and others . . . . Appellants VS. Rukmani and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) CM No.2723-C-2010 Notice in the application. At this stage, Mr.J.K. Goel, Advocate puts in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that he has no objection if appeal is restored. Hence, present application is allowed and appeal is restored. RSA No.4695 of 2009 Learned Counsel for the appellants reiterates his prayer that he may be allowed one year time to vacate the premises. Learned counsel for the respondents, however, submits that the time may not be granted to the appellants to vacate the premises as warrant of possession has already been issued. CM No.2723-C-2010 and -2- RSA No.4695 of 2009 After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any merit in the present appeal much less the prayer made by counsel for the appellants. Hence, the prayer is hereby rejected. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) March 04, 2010 JUDGE vivek