IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.18287-CII of 2010 & COCP No.491 of 2010 Date of Decision : 13.09.2010 Pushpa Lata ... Petitioner Versus D.P.S.Nagal & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Khanna, Advocate for the respondents. *** HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) CM No.18287-CII of 2010 For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. Short affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. CM stands disposed of. COCP No.491 of 2010 It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that possession of alternate plot No.77-A measuring 450 sq. meters has been handed over to the petitioner but it is contended that the basic amenities necessary for starting an industry has not been provided by the respondents even though this Court has ordered to provide amenities, if any one is lacking at the spot, within a period of four months vide order dated 24.03.2008. In reply, it has been pointed out that all the amenities have been provided. The roads have already been constructed and that the sewerage work has been allotted to one agency namely M/s Ramesh Kr., Gurgaon. Similarly, water supply line has been laid in front of plot COCP No.491 of 2010 -2- as well as electrification has been provided near the plot. It is also pointed out that allottee of plot No.77-A has raised construction and is running industry. Learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the facts of providing amenities and submits that none of the basic amenities are functional. From the reply filed on behalf of respondent, it transpires that steps have been taken to provide necessary basic amenities in as much as on the adjoining plot, an industry is already functional. In view of the above, the instant contempt petition is dismissed. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to submit a representation for the lack of any basic amenities. As and when any such representation is filed, the same shall be decided by the respondents expeditiously in accordance with law. 13.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) sonia JUDGE