IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT OHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER. 2011 BEFORE THI’ HOW8I JIRS JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA M$A No 21835/2010 IMV BETWFFW I’ ‘A’ S K’ ‘—‘V I I r L I., ‘- SlID: • • 1 vi •( S -2- MVC.NO.29f2008, ON TIlE FILE ‘iF THE CiVIL JUDGE SR.DN.I & M.A.C.T., GANGAVATI 11, AWARDING THE COMPENSATION OP RS.2.47.6861- Will! INTEREST AT THE RATE OF P.A. FROM THE DATE (iF THE PETIThZ TILL RALISATh)N. THIS APPEAL CuMING ON FoR oRDERS, THIS DAY. THE CUUR1 DELIVERED THE FOI.LOWINO: JUDGMENP Learned counsel for the 4:1 respondent submits that the issue raised in this appeal is covered by the decision of this Apex Court in the case of U7TAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. KULSUM AND OTHERS reported in CDJ 2011 SC 696. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. The statuton deposit before this Court be transmitted to the Tribunal. sal 3TJDGt RKK/ ‘ø