IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 24047 of 2005 Between: Smt.Sreeram Satyavani ..... PETITIONER AND The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Seeking a Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in insisting the petitioner and her family members to settle the disputes with the 3rd respondent duly summoning them to the police station and interfering with her life and liberty at the instance of the 3rd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home. It is stated that the 3rd respondent filed a false case against the petitioner in CC.No.213 of 2005 on the file of the II Additionl Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajamundry, for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the petitioner has been contesting the said case. It is further stated that there are no warrants pending against the petitioner in the said case. Without there being any warrant and without there being any report of complaint filed against the petitioner, at the instance of the 3rd respondent, respondents 1 and 2 are interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the dispute with the 3rd respondent. Without there being any complaint and without there being registration of any F.I.R. against the petitioner, the respondents 1 and 2 cannot interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner, without there being any report by any person and without registration of any F.I.R. against the petitioner. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 10.11.2005 Dsr