Civil Revision No. 4657 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4657 of 2011 Date of Decision: 3.8.2011 Karnail Singh …Petitioner Versus M/s Rajinder Kumar Jain & Sons and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Satbir Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed to assail the impugned order dated 9.3.2010 (Annexure P2), passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa, whereby the objection petition, instituted by the petitioner in the execution proceedings, has been dismissed with costs. Briefly stated, respondent No.1-M/s Rajinder Kumar Jain & Sons had filed a suit for recovery of ` 1,03,200 including the interest amount. The suit filed by respondent No.1 was decreed with costs holding that respondent No.1-firm is entitled to recover the above said amount. In the objection petition (Annexure P1), it was stated that the decree has been passed on the basis of account books of respondent/plaintiff/decree holder, which were neither reliable nor the Civil Revision No. 4657 of 2011 2 same were maintained in accordance with the procedure prescribed. Therefore, the decree was obtained by suppressing factual entries and the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court was not warranted. It was pleaded in the objection petition Ex.P1 that the decree was obtained by suppressing material facts. The Executing Court had dismissed the objection petition holding that the objections pertain to the entries made in the account books of decree holder and its truth and veracity cannot be examined by the Executing Court as the controversy to this effect already stood settled by the Civil Court when the decree was passed against the objector/judgment debtor. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has failed to convince this Court as to how the Executing Court can travel beyond the decree. No case for interference is made out as the order passed by the Executing Court suffers from no infirmity. Hence, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge August 3, 2011 “DK”