1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3535 OF 2008 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for the petitioner Mr.Suhas M. Oak for the respondent Nos.37 to 48. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 9,2009 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. By the impugned orders, certain documents have been marked as exhibits on the ground that same are admitted. The learned trial Judge purported to mark the said documents as exhibits subject to proof. The order is purely interlocutory in nature and therefore, this writ petition cannot be entertained. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that if the learned Trial Judge is not satisfied that the documents are proved, the petitioners may be granted liberty to lead further evidence. The said relief cannot be 2 granted in this petition. It is for the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law before the trial court. 2 Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. JUDGE