IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. .....%^.2T./.2003 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS >•; ^>a< '^ .^y ^^ ^^""" ^>^ : Indramani Pandey, S/o Shri Ramdatta Pandey / Aged about 65 years, R/o Bramhanpara, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary finance, planning Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. /2r. Collector, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja 3. Accountant General (ANE) IInd Gwalior (M.P.) ^k Joint Director, Treasury & Accounts 85 Pension, Bilaspur (C.G.) /^. Dtett. Education Ofl&rcT, Ambik^ur, Distt Surguja. 6. Joint Director PubUc Education Department Surguja. 7. Principal Govt. Higher Sec. School Kargi Darima Road, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja /8. Accountant General RaipUr (ANE) Chhattisgarh 2; (9 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2^7 GF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC.22 ?:n^r^Fr ^F'^ilt?! ^Tfw ^t^a < ~^B( ^I<||<1^/ ^tll'y^KS/ ('^Kill^y 31T^T XCT? ^ •<?; ^L(2-/^_ Niwfll w*li<^ ' *t'**t<<*"" ^^ 200 Rt^c^* 3??^?l'?^iT^ ^rft(T 26/4/2003 Shri Maiioj Paranjpe State by Shri Saiija^ Heard. The pctitioner has iuaction of the respond^ submitted by him regardi aiid other service benefits tll-ie Havin^ considered case mid materim on re4 ends of justice will serfe petitioner to make a detailj of this order to the com^ from todav aiid 011 sud conipetent authority sha{ll reasoncd order in accordt from the date of productio| order is passed and ttie ^ may file the petition afre^] made cleai' that this Couift. the nierits of the casej uudisputed dues be paid ^ Wit.h the aforesaid disposed of. of. Consequently, M.W.| Certilled copy as pei| ^l^^l WT^f ^ 1^11^ if^l^H ^NN^^ll^T |, counsel for the petitiouer, S. Agrawal, Paiiel Lawyer. ^refcrrcd this pctition against the |nts by which the represeutation ^ig disbursing ofaiTears ofpension has not been decided, facts aiid circumstances of the iord, in the opinion of this Court, if a direction is given to the pd representation aloug-with a copy btent authority'within fifteen days |h representation bemg filed the decide tlie sanie by passing a auce with law within two moutKs n of representatiori. If aiiy adverse etitioner thereby feels aggrieved,ge ?h challenging the said order. It is has not expressed aiiy opinion on It is further directed that the o the petitioner. observat.ions, this petition staiids P<; aud IA., if ariy, staiid disposed rules. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^IP M^ Wi^i ^^w