SSK/57 1 WP.8918.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8918 OF 2010 Bhikaji Dondiram Parle ....Petitioner Versus The Maharashtra State Co-op.Consumer Federation Limited & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. S. M. Rayrikar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. P. S. Cardozo, AGP for respondents. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 21st MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Heard Mr. Raylikar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Cardozo, learned AGP for the respondents. 2. The petitioner challenges the election to the Managing Committee of respondent no.1, firstly on the ground of corruption and secondly on the ground that 11 voters have not received postal ballots. The petitioner contested the election against respondent no.3. The petitioner got 67 votes and respondent no.3 got 75 valid votes. Out of 11 voters, who allegedly have not received ballot papers, 5 voters have filed affidavits and submitted that they have received ballot papers and they have no complaint. So far as the allegation of corruption is concerned, the SSK/57 2 WP.8918.10 petitioner in support of his allegation has not filed any affidavit as required under the provisions of Section 144 (T) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The term of the Managing Committee of respondent no.1 is due to expire in July, 2011. 3. In the above facts and circumstances, I do not find any merit in the writ petition, so as to enable me to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petition is, therefore, dismissed. (RANJIT MORE, J.)