IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18390 of 2009 1. SUKESH CHOUDHARY, SON OF SHRI NAND KISHORE CHOUDHARY 2. SANTOSH CHAUDHARY 2 SANTOSH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, SON OF SHRI NAND KISHORE CHAUDHARY 3. SUDARSHAN CHAUDHARY, SON OF SHRI BAL MUKUND CHAUDHARY 4. MUKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ MUKESH CHAUDHARY, SON OF SHRI NAND KISHORE CHAUDHARY 5. PAPPU CHAUDHARY, SON OF SHRI BAL KRISHNA CHAUDHARY 6. LALAN CHAUDHARY, SON OF SHRI BAL KRISHNA CHAUDHARY 7. RAJESH CHOUDHARY, SON OF SHRI BAL MUKUND CHAUDHARY 8. ANJANI CHAUDHARY, SON OF HARSH NARAYAN CHAUDHARY 9. HARSH NARAYAN CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE MAHAVIR CHAUDHARY 10. BAL KRISHNA CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE MAHAVIR CHAUDHARY 11. NAND KISHORE CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE HRIDAY NARAYAN CHAUDHARY ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – MEHAN, P.S. BALLIA, P.O. DANDARI, DISTT. BEGUSARAI. ------ PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SITA RAM PASWAN, SON OF LATE BHIKHAN PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MEHAN, P.S. BALIA, DISTT. BEGUSARAI. ----- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 21.06.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 18.3.2009 passed in Begusarai, Sadar, S.C/S.T. (Begusarai) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2008 by which the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, has taken cognizance on the various provisions of Indian Penal Code as well as Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act. The contention of the petitioner is that apart from 2 the Informant, no independent witness has supported the factum of occurrence and in fact, they all have stated that the Informant had been set up by the local Mukhiya to institute this case against the petitioner. Since these are the factual aspects which can only be adjudicated at the stage of trial and the Informant has supported this case even in his further examination, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)