111@HG@UfETW ^mu^niR ^a GOIIASMs Claimants HOWB SM^mil^^ Mise.JtoBeal^N^4«^^a>ee^^^^^^^^ 1 ^nlram N^iact^ i^d ^^iA 4©years, S^CboilulNlsN^" r 2 St^^w^ BIA Nirt^ l^A^^i^^ yeai^\ ^ri8e^^l^ ; Both RA> Vlltag®"-B@Nd, Fk© eeSfettten - Rnge^war (RW^, Dtefric^ Raipur (C^r ResDondente Non-dajiiFiiis VE^US Ahmed Khsui, fsril NhiR, W6 <ly|^Wl;':' • .tllli,:. \}!S^^Wa^:.PiW^/^ ^Wtton ^^^^^^ ^,.^WiM» Na^s®%mn'Kt(<|G| priver of Jeep ^^^^^^^^^^ ^felEai<»»No.©©G(i©^E^ Pandlt Kumar ®enyl,Rito Main Bagbahara, Piolfee^8tett<»»— 1 QistFict - Nalwsarpitnd (G<^ (CNffiw of Jeep Wt^i?^NU^ registrsrttoff No.WC^^ The New- to^ Nsuim^ @oro| nFiy Utr^d, throygh piwis^rt (pc^ ©l^isKanal Nar^^r, ^A 8tN?t, Ba|rau1^ Marfe^;, Raipyr, TelsW ii ©istelet~ Ralpur <©<^(Insyrer o1 <teep Wriote^ bearing ^egistrsto N& <S<S 06^A-202^ ••U i MiseeUanfis»usfcADB»rfund®K^®<^on<iy8^if Pr^ent : Shn ShN@A F^BI^ a^^ . ,;-<xNi^i^^^:N%»i?^-:.^'4.:. .?.11 ^ ^ 'r- None fer r^pCTXt®^N@^ 1widt. '^" •&- ^Klli^ ;@IW8t^NitB|lTl^|G^^ Anand ©upta,c^yrtfi»Ns|lt^ ^y: •'^•^^•^- .;;;-!';"-:^';p-;:;;^-.^^:S:?S>^•^^^ is^iw^mt^ The folt®Min@ Qi'der c^ t^ ©oyrt w»s passect Is^ R^eev duptey^rtl. The untoitororte pawents ctf de^ased l)©y*totetee^^Ni^^T agetf about 7 yea are the appeUa^li^o^ en^ancen^ <^^ ccwnpe^^ a^apleil toy the 1<l ^^|RS^ | l^okwAe^eteE^^lato^T^^ vNe|waRlda^tm.€®.2(M16,^^e^ ^ As agarfnst^ie <^ip@(wata"i ©fRs.it2t^,@©^etedme^t^ the appeUafrtstelaimantSt unfortoffiate parerte @f cte©^s®^b@y l^ilcteep Nlshgd, by flBng a eteto p^tiOR ipder ^c^iQR t^^^f ) the Netor \^iiele&J^t, fer Ns death ^ ll^ ITO^ aeddrt en^^- 01.02.2006, th& TNbunal «wardeda totat sura eff Rs^S»©^"fl®^~ c<^pen^(U@n alcingNft inler^^^^^p^ oftl^Wn^©ftlw€latopeUUonW ie4^of^^ ^ Shrt Shl^nda Pimclya s^ ^ri Tiu^ @a^^ia^^|^^ wunselfor theappeBaCTte^ erred In awaFdh^ tow eomper®aN<m^^^^^^ j appellar^ son NuNeep NNwd ^i®aNiMI^ ste^^ twight fyten®gmd tie would have esrtencted grsBat Nippeirt ^ ^ pswente SR thelrold age. 4) Shri Shree KunmrAgian^teafR^ Anand Qupta, teaCTied e^tfrasel IEIF re^enetent h^ tw%N«yW^i ^ i a^l^Si^^iML....^ Insui-anee Gompar^ Umited, ©nUNT other ftand ^ytemlttect tiat the ccptpenss^n of Rs^,00©^asvarded t^^^^^t^^ proper compensatton in the facte su^ c^umstanc^ <rf th»4 8swi^ 5) The Apex Coyrt white consicterin^ ss to wh^ would be <h® just and pFopercompen^rtion forthe ct^^ of aGMId aQedabovt^ yearsin eeaseofOrlentallnsia»anceGo.Ltd.¥tfSyedtei'ahini and ottiers reported in 2@W ^ T«A.©.^^^^^^(S.©^observed to paFas9&t&: MQ. This G©yrtin LateWadNwa whtleeompytti^ compensaitton made distinctlon be^yeen »e ctece^^ childreRfsUir^wlU^thea^^pup@(^ 5 to 10 yeam and a@e gffoyp of IQlo tS yeam. 10. In Gase^«?yyoun^^hildren of teiwlw age, bi view of uiweEtaiiiiU^ about, netther thelr incomesAihe ttme(yfdea8iftorttepE®pecteoy the future incpease In their tnooine n@r ©hancet of advancement of thetr career are ^pateite <^ proper ctetermlnation on estimatec^ baais. The reason is that at such an earty a@e, th® uncertalnties in regard to theh' aeadeinte pursuits^ aehievements to oar^ <nd ttwrealteBr advancemerrt In life; are so many ttiat netNi^ can tee assymed wi a^Rable (^'tain^.- Therefore. netther is ttie Ineome @^ ttw - dee^aseGt ©Nld eapaNe ^^^ a^^ ^w^^ estimsrtedb^tetiortettie^flnaiielaAteissayiwedt by the parent& a^able ^ Rnathematteat* computertlon." -^.. 4 The Apex Court in the <»seof Orlentel Inswance Co. LN. V. Syed Ibrahim and others (supra), held that the Gompensatien of Rs.51,500/- was just and proper compensation for ttie death ®fa chiklaged about seven years. 6) The CQmpensation of R8.7Q,OOG!/- awareted by the Tribunal when examined in the context of the above quoted dtetum of the Apex Court In the case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Syed Ibrahim and others (supra), and the fact that appeltants' son Kuldeep Nishad was aged about 7 years only, in our optmon, does not call for any enhancement In this appeal. 7) As we do not flnd any scope for enhancement of the Gompensation awarded by the Tribunal. the appeal filed by the appellants/claimants for enhancement ofthe compensation Is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 8) No order as to costs. — subbu Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge