--??"" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENT W.P. (C) No. 1781 of 2010 Rajesh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Tej Ram Sahu, aged about 35 years, R/o Panchsheel Nagar, Charoda, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus Regional Transport Authority, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (WritPetition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Appearance : Mr. Santosh Gupta, Counsel forthe petitioner. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer forthe respondent. ORAL ORDER (21.04.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard finally with the consent of the parties. Petitioner- Rajesh Kumar Sahu has filed this petition for issuance of necessary direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Raipur to consider and decide his application dated 02.06.2009 for renewal of the regular permit No. 26/94 on the route Raipur to Durg via Kumhari, Charoda and back 4 single trips daily in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. According to the petitioner, the application for renewal of permit has been filed and no decision has been taken till date. Mrs. Smita Ghai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that if the application has been filed by the petitioner for renewal of regular permit and the same has not been disposed of till date, the Regional Transport Authority shall dispose of the same at the earliest in accordance with law. In view ofthe above submissions made by learned Panel Lawyer for ttie respondent, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if the W.P/CVNo. 1781 of2010 concerned Regional Transport Auftiority has not decided the application dated 02.06.2009 filed by the petitioner for renewal of regular permit for the above route till date, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner before the said authority. With the aforesaid direction/observation, this petition stands of. r — —— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge |