INJHE HIGH CQ^URT^F^CUHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FIRST APPEAJ. N0^ 64- /2QQ7- ^- FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL APPELLANT DEFENDANT No.3 RESPONDENT .........^^ .^o-"L,c>h>'tv 'ri e.\s't ^^^ ^^•" 'S Cs^- ^•^ ^ '^ ^v ^^•a" ovy' ^c^> PROCEDURE.1908 .1 £^>!.' • r r a ;i.'L:; U^ ^^ "^; Dr. T. R. Sahu son of Shri H. R. Sahu, Retired Chief Medical Officer, District Hospital Raigarh (C.G.). Resident of Saket Dhhimrapur, Raigarh (C.G.), VERSUS <• 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Raigarh. •' ...Defendant No.l Dr, M,M. Shrivastava son of Not known, District-Hospital, Raigarh (C.G.), R/o - Mukut Nagar, Beladula, Raigarh (C.G.) ...Defendant No.2 Jhankesh Kumar Sahu, son of Damrudhar, aged about 02 years Minor, Through Bali Mata Smt. Parvati Bai Sahu wife of Damrudhar Sahu, Occupation- , R/o Baikunthpur, Raigarh Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) ...Plaintiff -HG—78 ~sss •<ii<iid<i, ^tTl'y'Ko, Tsxniyy F fl. A/o. 6L1 ^Wflf 8i*irai an^i ''PRT ('jqi^'^t) aii^tw K.-u'h 'craj 3TT^T s»i*llq) TOIIW^lfttI 31)^1 S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. cM<lIt;1<l1l ^l^^i ^ fs^ TFil^K ^sifinsn^i T arwal 04^8-2010 None for the appellant. Shri Sameer Behar, Panel Lai|vyerfor the State. The matter is called twice On both occasions, none appears nor any representation| is made on behalf of the appeltant. It seems Uiat the app^llant may not be interested in prosecutlng the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is disi|nissed for non-prosecuBon. Jl———— Sdi- N.K.Agar'wa! Judge s