c^ yoV IN THE HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. NQ. 170 /2004 PETITIONER ^•^-^ ^fe^"/ ...•••^^'s^'' ^^^^:'t'" ^^' ^' ^'^ D.P. Manhar, S/o.Shri Nanki Ram. Manhar, aged about 50 years, R/o Sharda Vihar, M.I.G./ IB/ 19, Distt. Korba. (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1 The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Departinent of Adira Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jan Jati Vikas Vibagh, D.K.S Bahawan RaipurfC.G.) 2. The Sahayak Ayukt,Advasi Vikas Korba (C.G. ) 3. The Distt. Collector, Korba (C.G.) 4. R.KThawait, S/o Shri Tha\vait, aged about 50 years. (approx.) R/o Nehru Nagar Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTnCLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 "'• affl^ttW Rfll'b Sfl^Sl sfr^h ^^ •^•aOTRl'if,S'aRa*i6,ft<?lm3< . sff^r'W® _^_^_..^f--^e'..^fsc . -^ ,M 'WIWWW?"""""""""""""""""""'!6!'! 3 ^H^T ^ii^ft '^ti'ff Deen uaderlArticle 06.02.2004 Shri tJB»y.S.Bhai.i^Gouns ShriP. Das, Paaiel Lawyer I.A. No.495/2004 has petitioner as afiter filiag of fhis been caacelled. Prayer for amendinent is petitioner is directed to file fhe the course of fhe day. lu view offhe above order,| By tfais writ petition of India fh.e petitioncr has.souy dated 12.01.2004 (Aanexuie P-( 06.10.2003 (Annexuic P-1) bc / The case offhe petiti.oner at Goverument Higher ScGondeu|y vide ordei- dated 06.10.2003 tfaje | as VikasKhaad ShikstiaAdIukati No.4 on whose plaee fhe handed over the chai^c to the take charge onlyon 29,12.200^ No.4 succeed and earlier trans( cauceUed videAiuiexure P-3. I have heaidlearaed }el for fhe petitioner. iforfhe State. filed for aiaeadiuent by fhc twrit petition his transfer order has laUcwed. Lcaraed coimsel for the 4mended copy of fhe petitiou dunag <k[<i(y''(l-i w^'^'fti^^ ^sffifffafi^) II.A, No.495/04 staads disposed of. 226/227 ofthe Constitutipn )U^ht relief fhaf fhe impugned order •p) be quashed and the order-dated rejstored. |is fhat he was working as Lecturer School, Lafa, Distnct Korba and Ipetitionerwas proiaoted and posted ca^i, Korbaand thereafter, respondent was posted initialfy did not tpetitioner and tlie petitioncr could aad by inanipulation respondent |Fer order (Annexure P-1) h^ been ap, peti1|ioner coun^el for fhe partics. XI-HC-22 '3^ STSl$PT, anltt't®,R«?tt(iy. sn^i^f f^'ii* si^s Sti^ttfr ^^f Ifel :IK';i ( ^Sx ?^irai< *l''i(oi4fl-lVH^ ^ 1%^ '^%R '^sif^ty^t^f t Leam.ed counsel for fhe fetitioiier subinits fhat ia coiapliaucc of fhe order datcd06.IO.200^ (AanexureP-1) fhe petitiAier has shifted with atl Bis fainify meijibers to prescnt placc ofpostu^ and his. chlldren are studyuig fh^rie; therefore, he isubnuts that fhc petitioner may be attowed to c(( is over. Leamed Paael Lawyer f dated 12.01.2004 (Aimexure therefore, there is no qucstion In view bf fhe above aBowcd to make a detaUed rej: wifhia fcn Says fium. tod^- intin.ue there till ftie academic session |>r fhe State submits that fhe ordcr- P-3) has already bcen aaplenacnted, pfstayiag the same. ^ubinission leamed counsel for thc petitioner subnuts that the ^titfoner may be aUowcd to niake a detaUed represcntation to resijondcnt No. 1, to wliich leamed Panel Lawyer has no objection. Haviag heard fhe leaniep counsel for the parties aad haviag tegard to the facts and circunl.staiices of the case, the petitioncr is aeseirtation raising all hls gnevaaces to resppndent No.l and in tum, respondcnt No.l after cpnside^ug att the grievaaces offhe petitioner shaB decidc the repreaentatio^. wifhin a period of thirty days fix>m. the date of receipt of fhe s^mc in an objective inaaner wifh a reasoned order. Tlie pctrdon is disposed No. 139/2004 &I.A.No.419/Sp04alsostand dMposed of. Certified copy as per Rul^s. : \ |of accordiagly. Consequeatly, M.W.P. ^ L.C.Bhadoo ~ Judge