RT^ Wi& 1T?ra' ^?"TPT;iT9 ^S^ '^TOTcT3?, ®l^l''<ijl'S 7nf^M. (??U ^3600 / 200$ •i.ilfacpicptlf : ^t -rT^%wn ft^r snWuf ETTf^T 3RrR' ft^iT ^g' WTW] 60 -srf fSrar SH^-T sTiterot, R^iray f^T^ft 27 ^Rft ^rey ^?3ft^ ^ f^r?TT ft^RTy (®."?T.) f^~^^ a^T^T^TTT'OT i- w^€v^ir's ?TRT^ IKT ^f^ra, ^T^s, ^ ^7lK ^h^|UT r^-wnr ^t.'^.Traf. 'qTpf^ ?77?y (CT.Tr.) 2- 3rin^'3=' ~^^S, '^W^, ~^ TTRqT? qT?^iui f^^TFT sl. ^.iTTf. VW,, •<!'>.14<'. ('E?.7T.) ^TTf^raTT Sia-i'=r ST's'c'y'^ 226 ~+TR7frT? 7ffqyTFT SB: Bon'fcie SSiri K. Aasrihotri. J. Preseiit: Shri V.K.Mishra, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Arwi Sao. Govenusient Advocate forthe Stat&TesDondent; <f'ii3* A 't •Q'OT'^S'U ^s,.i-t 'L^s^sJ^siiS^ (Passed on 10m da>- of July, 2008) I. With the consent ofthe paTties, the matter is taken up fbr hearin? finallv. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tliat the petitioner does Eot want to press this petition on irierits, at this stage. However, tlie pstitioner may be psroiitted to make a representation before Ihe concsnied aiifhorities within a period ofthi-ee davs and the same iriav be directed to bs decided. m accordance with lav7, witbinthe prescribed tims. 3. Shri Arun Sao, !eanied Rovernment AdvocaSe appearing for the State/ -rssponderis siibmits that 5f tbe represe'itation is made, the same sha!l be considered and decided bv the concemed authoriti/. in accordance with !aw, on the ixs ovi'n merits, witfcin a period of two weeks from fhe date of receipt of tl representation. 4. In view offhe foresoing, nothing survives in the matter. Shri Sao farther submits that no coercive steps shal! be taken. tiU the disoosa! ofthe representation. Accordingly, fhe petition is disposed.of. Ko order asto costs. .&jmt Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge HB'I'T'"