IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.216 of 2011 SHANKAR KUMAR ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 03.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner for quashing the Kochadhaman P.S.Case No. 113/2010 registered for the alleged offences under Section 366A of the Indian Penal code. It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.5 both being major solemnized the marriage on their free will which would be apparent on perusal of the marriage certificate as contained in Annexure 2 granted by the Marriage officer Jalpaiguri, West Bengal as also the admit card of the respondent no. 5 indicating her date of birth. It is submitted the above case has been lodged for the ulterior purpose and the petitioner as also the respondent no.5 are living together happily as husband and wife. The counsel appearing for the State, on the other hand ,submits that the F.I.R has been lodged by the respondent no.4, who happens to be the mother of respondent no.5. Considering the rival submissions of the parties and on perusal of the allegations of first information report as also defence of the petitioner that they are major and married as also the facts and circumstance of the case, let the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation police report be submitted forthwith. This application stands disposed of. Namita ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)