IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2008 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 559 of 2008(S) -------------------------------------------- (ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1110/2004 DATED 23-7-2007 IN O.P.NO.21615 OF 2001 DATED 3-3-2004) PETITIONER/IST RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------------------- DR.ANITHA S.NAIR, W/O.S.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, AGED 48 YEARS, LECTURER,DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACY ATHURASRAMAM, N.S.S HOMEO MEDICAL COLLEGE, KURICHI,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT: -------------------- SRI. P.J.THOMAS, (AGE AND S/O.ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.P.SREEKRISHNAN. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR , J. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Contempt Case (Civil) No.559 of 2008-S ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of May , 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Inter alia alleging that the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in O.P.No.21615/2001dated 3-3-2004 confirmed in W.A.No.1110/2004 , the complainant is before us with a request to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings and punish the respondent for the so called wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders and directions issued by this Court. 2. Sri.M.P.Sreekrishnan, learned Government Pleader, on instruction, would submit that the State being aggrieved by the orders passed by this Court have filed a Special Leave petition and the same is pending for consideration. 3. In view of the aforesaid development, at this stage, it may not be necessary for us to take cognizance of this contempt case filed by the petitioner/complainant. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dropped for the present. However, liberty is reserved to the complainant to approach this Court, if need arises in future. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) JUDGE MS