IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 753 OF 2009 SHRI. DHIRUBHAI JEEVANBHAI TANDEL ... Petitioner Versus GOA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH MEMBER SECRETARY AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Shri D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri Vivek Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Coram:- NARESH H. PATIL & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 23rd February, 2010 P.C.:- Heard. Shri V. Rodrigues, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the Government, Goa, has placed on record a list consisting of seven persons who were issued notices/orders by the GCZMA. The authority has passed orders directing removal of the illegal structures/shacks/huts. The individual orders are also placed on record along with the list of cases. They are marked 'X' for identification, and are taken on record. Shri D. Pangam, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Tourism Authority could not have issued NOC in violation of the CRZ Regulations/Notifications. The Petitioner is at liberty to independently challenge the said Order passed in respect of Pascoal Fernandes/Avelino Fernandes in respect of the huts and shacks situated in survey no.274/1, Mandrem, which are not ordered to be demolished. On the last occasion, learned Additional Government Advocate for the Government had placed on record a bunch of notices/orders issued in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009 against some of the occupants of owners of the huts/shacks. It is necessary for us to observe that by an Order dated 16-12-2009, the Division Bench of this Court had taken note of the show cause notices issued in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009 and had observed that copies of show cause notices produced be placed on record. Now, we do not find such notices and orders in the record of the Court. In the light of the orders passed by the authorities, we find that the petition should be disposed of. Petition is accordingly disposed of. NARESH H. PATIL, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.