^?<? L^ •^^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BSLASPUR Writ Petstion (Art.227) No.5586 of 2011 Petiiloners 1. Laia, S/o . Jagbandhu Rawat, aged Plaintlffs about 40 years. 2. Paiu, S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, aged about 38 years. 3. Diwali, S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, agsd about 36 years. 4. Bihari S/o Jagbandhu Rawat, aged about 34 years. 5. Namo S/o Jagbandhu Rawat^ aged about 19years. 6, T^lal D/c Jagbandhu Rawat, aged aboist 32 years. 7. Shambhu S/o Jagbandhu, aged about 24 years. 8. Sanyasi S/o Shyam Kumar, aged about 60 years. 9(a) Minor Kuntaia, D/o Kirtan, ©gedabout tQyears. (b) Minor Shakuntate, D/o Kirtan, aged about 14years. (c) Minor Chandrabhan, S/o Kirtan, aged about 12years. (d) Minor Rooplai, S/o Kirtan, ag^d about 10yea.rs. (e) EViinor Shadi LaS S/o Kirtan aged about 8 years. (f) Samari Wd/o Kirtan, aged about 45 years. No.9(a) to (e) minor, through naturai guardian mother yamari Wd/o Kirtan. 10. Devraj S/o Shyam Kumar, aged about 30 years. 11. Mst.Baratkunwar SlQ Shyam Kumar, aged about 27 years. 12. Mst.Aratkunwar, S/o Shyam Kumar, aged about 25 years. 13. Puran S/o Parsu Rawat, aged about 65 years. 14. Knparam S/o Parsurawat, agetf abouf 52years, 15. Mst.Jhalmaihin Wd/o Jagbandhu, aged about 65 years. Al! by occu.agricuSturist, R/o VslSage Samaruma, Tahsil Ghargohoda, District-Raigarh (C.G.) Versus 1. Satyabhama, D/o Shyam Sunder, aged about 55 ysars, R/o Garjanjor, TshsiE Himgir, Djstricst Sundergrh (Orissa). RespGndents Defendants ^1 f^^' 2. Jema, D/o Shyam Suna'er, aged about 50 years. R/o Sarajpail, Tahsjj: Gharghoda, Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) 3(a) Smt.Udiya Wd/o Jaipa!, aged about 60 years. Occupatlon-Agricuiture. (b) Devnarayan Yadav, S/o Jaipai, aged about 32 years, Occupatlon- AgrJouiturQ. (c) Ramesh, S/o Jaipai, aged about 25 years, Occupation AgricuSturo. (d) Laiita, D/o Jaspai, aged about 22 ysars, Occupatlon Agrjcuiture. Respondent No.3(a) to 3(b) resident of Bhaiumar, Tahsil Gharghoda, Dlstt.Raigarh (C.G.) and respondent No.3(c) to 3(d) R/o JhalmaSa, Tahsil Pusore, Dist.Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Mst.Bhuri, S/o Duryodhan Rawat, aged about 45 years, Occupation- Agriculture, R/o Vijiage Bhaiumar, Tahsii Gharghoda, Dlstt.Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Kendo, S/o Duryodhan, ag©dabout 46 years, Occupation AgricuJture, R/'o vlSiage BhaSumar, Tahsli Gharghoda, Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) 6. Mst.Rajkuman, D/o Duryodhan, aged about 42 years. occupatjon agricu'ture, R/o Viliage Aadmuda, Tahsii and Djstt.Raigarh (C.G.) 7. Mst.DHkumari, D/o Duryocshan, aged about 40 years, Occu.-Agricuiture, R/'o Viliage Kanika Tahsi!, Himgsri, Distt.Sundergarh (Orsssa). 8. Dufo, S/o Duryodhan, aged about 36 years, Occupation Agricuiture, Resldent of Viiiage Samaruma, Tahsii Gharghoda. Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) 9. Amrit Lai S/o Tjiakram, aged about 45 years, Occupation Agricuiture, R/o Vliiage Samaruma, Tahstl Qharghoda, Distt.-Raigam (C.G.) 10. Pawan, S/o Ghasiya, aged about 35 years, resident of Bajhamucta, TahsiS Ghargohda, DistS.Raigarh (C.G.). 11. Shravan S/o Ghassya, aged about 37 years, Occupation Agricuiture, R/o Viliage Saralbhacidar, Tahsi! and Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) . 12. Mst.Hara, S/o Ghasiya, aged about 34 years, Occupation AgricuSture, R/Q viiiage Saraibhaddar. Tahsii and DJstt.Raigarh (C..G.) -I- ^t^ n'^' 13. Basant Wd/o Ghasiya, aged about 40 years, R/o ViSIage Saraibhadar. Tahsil and Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) 14. Usatram S/o Mohan. aged about 45 years, Occupation AgricuSture, R/o Viliage Samaruma Tahsii Gharghoda, Distt.-Raigarh (C.G.) 15. Mst.Amurto. D/o Mohan. aged about 32 years, Occupation Agricuiture, R/o vjJlage Dhunda, TahsiS Jharsguda, Distt.Jharsguda (Orissa). 16. Mst.Rampyari, D/o Dashrath, aged ^bout 45 yesirs, Occupation Agricuiture, R/o jylahlaj, Distt.Raigarh 17. Smt.Ranjana Jindal, WJfo Rakesh Kumar Jindal, sged about 32 years, OccupatJon-Business, R/o Naya Ganj Raigarh, Tahsii snd Distt.Raigarh 18« State cf Chhattisgarh, Through- Coliector, Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Articie227 ofths Constitution of india) Mr.Govind Devvansan, counset for th©petitioners. Mr.Akhii Agrawai, PanoS Lawyer for rospondont s\§o/18/State, on advance notice. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ORDER (23-9-2011) 1. By this writ petitjon under Article 227 of ths Constitutson of india the petitionors have chaiSenged the iegality & proprioty of the order dated 21.4.2011 passed by the 1rt Additiona! District Judge, Raigarh, in CMi Sust No.lO-A/2011, whereby appiication fiied for impounding th© document has bsen dismtesed. 2. i have heard iearned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned ordor and other documonts. 3. On due consjderation, i do not fsnd any iiJogaiJty In the order impugned warranting interforonco. Consoquontiy, tho writ potltion Is iiabSe to be dlsmissed and it is ihereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge