IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12351 of 2008 SHANTI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 04.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. This Court is not satisfied that any ground has been made out either by violation of any statutory provisions, loss of status or pay to warrant interference in a transfer matter. However learned Counsel for the petitioner from Clause VI-A of the government circular dated 12.9.1995 submits that lady teachers are not to be transferred even within the district unless they complete five years in one school. The petitioner has been transferred barely after two years. The petitioner has filed a representation in that regard which remains un-disposed. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the aforesaid provision does not debar such a transfer in appropriate cases. This is an aspect to be appropriately considered while disposing of the representation of the petitioner filed in pursuance of government circular. Let it be so done by a reasoned order within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)