..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1894 OF 2008 Mohiddin Mohammad Sayyed. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Uday P.Warunjikar, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 1st August, 2008. DATED : 1st August, 2008. DATED : 1st August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.31 of 2008 of Karmala Police Station, Solapur. The said case is under Section 376 of IPC. 3. The prosecutrix has clearly stated that the applicant came to her house. Thereafter the applicant committed rape on her. The statement of the prosecutrix clearly implicates the applicant. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely ..(2).. implicated on account of some previous disputes. He has stated that the daughter-in-law of the applicant is related to the prosecutrix and as the son of the applicant and his wife were residing separately, the applicant has been falsely implicated. In my view, this reason appears to be farfetched for the prosecutrix to falsely implicate the applicant. 5. Thereafter it was submitted by the learned Advocate for the applicant that the applicant is not keeping good health and hence the applicant may be released on bail. As far as this aspect is concerned, it is seen that that condition of the applicant is not serious. He has hyper tension. The said ailment can be treated while the applicant is in jail. Thus, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant on the ground of health of the applicant. The statement of the prosecutrix clearly implicates the applicant. No case is made out for bail. Application for bail is rejected. Trial is expedited. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)