1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 1586 0F 2009 *** Sharadabai Parmeshwar Deshmukh and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and others *** 1. Counsel for the petitioner seeks time since he does not have instructions. Mr. Salunke who appears for Respondent No.6 caveator makes a statement, on instructions, that this petition challenges interlocutory order passed by the learned Minister during pendency of the revision applications. It appears from the record that there were two revision applications pending before the learned Minister Annexure-I, page 102 is the copy of the revision applications. Prayer clause of the writ petition shows that order dated 3rd February, 2009, passed by the Respondent no.2, canceling the order dated 7th January, 2009 passed in Revision Application NO.12 of 2009 and continuing the ad-interim stay order dated 14th January, 2009 passed in Revision Application No.13 of 2009 may please be quashed and set aside. I have seen other prayers also. Statement of learned counsel Mr. Salunke, on instructions, that petitioner challengers the interlocutory order and main revision applications have 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. been disposed of, is accepted and taken on record. 2. In this view of the matter, the petition has become infructuous and accordingly dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:11/02/2010. ans/1586