IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.507 of 2011 Rajan Kumar Das @ Rajesh @ Naushad, S/o Raj Kumar Das, R/o Mogalpura, Jamuni Rai Ka Kuan, P.S.-Khajekala, District-Patna. …………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar. 2. The Under Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar. 3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna, Bihar. 4. The Director General of Police, Bihar. 5. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar. 6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, Bihar. 7. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna. 8. The Jail Superintendent, Addarsh Kendriya Kara (Jail), Beur, Patna. ………………Opposite Parties ----------- 5 14.07.2011 Petitioner has filed this writ application challenging his preventive detention under the Prevention of Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981. On behalf of the petitioner, the only ground that has set forth is that he has been falsely implicated in criminal cases and making a ground that the order of preventive detention has wrongly been passed. He submits that in two criminal cases he was not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, his name transpired. He was accordingly, arrested in those cases but has later been bailed out. He frankly states that as of now he is on judicial remand under Section 392 IPC, in which bail application has been rejected by this Court as well. In our view, in matters of preventive detention it is subjective satisfaction of Detaining Authority that is important. Unless it is shown that the subjective satisfaction itself stands 2 vitiated. In this case, there is nothing to show that the subjective satisfaction that the petitioner would be a problem to the public order has wrongly been arrived at, we are unable to accept the contention of the petitioner in the matter. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sanjeet/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)