SCA/5142/2008 1/4 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5142 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge? ========================================================= AAYNABEN OZA W/O AVDHESHBHAI OZA D/O ABHAYBHAI TRIVEDI - Petitioner(s) Versus AVDHESHBHAI HARIDAS OZA - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR ARPIT A KAPADIA for Petitioner. MR ZUBIN F BHARDA for Respondent. ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 26/08/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Rule. Mr.Zubin Bharda, learned Advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the learned Advocates SCA/5142/2008 2/4 JUDGMENT appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing today. 2. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner – wife has prayed for an appropriate Writ, direction and/or order quashing and setting aside the order dated 11.02.2008 passed by the learned 7th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajkot below application Exh.11 in H.M.P.No.48 of 2005 by which the learned Trial Court has rejected the application submitted by the petitioner – wife for interim alimony of maintenance of herself and her minor daughter who is studying in Jr.K.G. 3. Mr.Arpit Kapadia, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner – wife has submitted that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner might not press for interim alimony so far as the applicant is concerned, but so far as minor daughter is concerned, interim alimony is required to be paid by the respondent – husband to meet with the expenses towards education and other expenses for maintenance of minor girl. SCA/5142/2008 3/4 JUDGMENT 4. Mr.Bharda, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent – husband under the instructions of respondent – husband who is personally present in the Court has submitted that so far as the minor girl is concerned, he is ready and willing to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.1350/- (Rupees One Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty only) per month from the date of application. However, so far as the arrears is concerned, some reasonable time be given to make the said payment. 5. Considering above, impugned order dated 11.02.2008 passed by the learned Trial Court below Exh.11 in H.M.P.No.49 of 2005 is hereby modified to the extent that the respondent-husband / father of the minor girl is directed to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.1350/- (Rupees One Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty only) per month towards minor Girl – Rushali / Tarshavi from the date of application i.e. 03rd October, 2005. Arrears at the rate of Rs.1350/- (Rupees One Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty only) per month from October, 2005 till August, 2008 shall be cleared by the respondent / husband / SCA/5142/2008 4/4 JUDGMENT father in 3(three) equal monthly installments from today to be deposited by the respondent – husband before the learned trial Court and on such deposit, the petitioner – wife shall be permitted to withdraw the same. The respondent – husband shall also continue to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.1350/- (Rupees One Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty only) per month as and when due and payable commencing from 01st September, 2008, to be paid on or before 10th of each Month, to be deposited with the learned trial Court and the learned trail Court is directed to permit the petitioner – wife to withdraw the said amount. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Direct service is permitted. [M.R.Shah,J.] satish