THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO:645 OF 2010 Dated:21.6.2010 Between: N.Venkatarao. Petitioner. And: D.Subbarao & another. Respondents. This Court made the following : ​THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO:645 OF 2010 ORDER: This contempt application is filed under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging that respondents have willfully and deliberately violated the directions issued by this Court on 18.3.2010 in W.P.M.P.No:7966 of 2010 in W.P.No:6196 of 2010. The petitioner is working as attender in Sri Malyadri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Temple, Malakonda, an institution goverened and controlled under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987. Though the petitioner was paid remuneration in time scale, when the same was withdrawn, he approached this Court. In the order dated 18.3.2010, this Court has suspended the order impugned in the writ petition. In this contempt case, it is the grievance of the petitioner that inspite of suspension of cancellation order, the respondents have not restored the time scale paid to the petitioner. Notice is issued by this Court by order dated 23.4.2010 for hearing on 15.6.2010. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Standing Counsel for the temples Sri V.T.M. Prasad has produced a copy of the proceedings in R.C.No:21 of 2008, dated 16.6.2010. By the aforesaid proceedings, the time scale granted to the petitioner is restored and the difference of salary for a period of 1.7.2009 to 31.5.2010 amounting to Rs.39,537/- is also paid to the petitioner by way of cheque bearing No:332377, dated 16.6.2010. Although there is some delay in complying the order but as the respondents have already paid the difference of salary by restoring the time scale, this Court is of the view that this is not a fit case to proceed further under the provisions of the Contempts of Courts Act. However, it is needless to observe that the respondents should be cautious in implementing the order of this Court whenever they receive the order and the compliance should be made at the earliest possible time. Subject to the above observation, contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. ___________________________ Justice R.Subhash Reddy Dated: 21.6.2010 Gurc. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO:645 OF 2010 21.6.2010