IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2579 of 2011 Date of decision: 21.4.2011 Hari Bhagwan Passi … Petitioner versus Ramesh Kumar and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. A.K.Kalsy, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for separate possession. He is aggrieved with the order dated 4.4.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge(Senior Division), Ludhiana, by dint of which the application filed by the defendants for re-examining Bal Krishan, Deed Writer, Ludhiana, has been allowed. The facts, in brief, are that Bal Krishan, Deed-writer, Ludhiana, had earlier been examined as DW-1 and had proved certain Wills; however, he could not prove Will dated 3.1.1958 executed by Dhan Devi and one rent-deed dated 11.3.1971 entered into between Mohan Lal Passi and Ramesh Kumar, allegedly due to the reason that he had not brought the relevant record. The trial Court has also observed in its order that for proper adjudication of the case and to decide the real controversy to prove the said Will and the rent-deed being necessary, permission should be granted for further examination of Bal Krishan, Deed-writer. Even otherwise, rules and procedure are hand-maid of justice and are meant for enhancing the same and not to scuttle it. The dispute between the parties is required to be disposed of on merits and not on the basis of technicalities. In this C.R. No. 2579 of 2011 -2- back-drop of the facts, there is no infirmity in the impugned order. The revision petition is dismissed. April 21, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE