IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16897 of 2010 TUNTUN SINGH @ VINAY SINGH, Son of late Hardeo Singh, resident of village- Sarhara, P.S. Siswan (Chainpur O.P.) District- Siwan..........................................................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.............................................Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 02.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is languishing in jail since 26.11.2009 in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that marriage took place in the year 2001 and the occurrence took place in the year 2008, hence the case does not come within the purview of Section 304(B) of the I.P.C. but since in the F.I.R. wrong date of marriage has been mentioned as a result of which the case has been registered under Section 304(B) of the I.P.C. as the victim died due to illness after more than seven years of the marriage. Learned counsel has drawn my attention to Annexure-4 by which the informant has admitted by filing of a petition before the learned C.J.M., Siwan, that the marriage took place on 01.05.2001 and under certain 2 misconception the case has been lodged though victim died due to illness. Considering the fact that the informant has retracted from his version as recorded in the F.I.R. without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the petitioner, Tuntun Singh @ Vinay Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Siwan, in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)