IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7710 of 2009 Between: B.S.R.K.Raju S/o.Late Parasarama Raju Special Assistant, Chilakalapudi Branch Machilipatnam,Krishna District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Central Bank of India., Zonal Office,Bank Street Koti,Hyderabad, rep.by its Zonal Manager 2 Central Bank of India., Regional Office, M.G.Road Labbipet,vijayawada,Krishna District rep.by its Regional manager 3 Central Bank of India., Chilakalapudi Branch, Machilipatnam Krishna District, rep.byits Branch Manager ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondents: ---- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to set aside order dated 09-04-2009 passed by respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner is kept under suspension. I have heard Sri K.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner is accused of passing wrong debit entries for the sums of Rs.6,000/- and Rs.2,000/- and crediting the said amounts to his account. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order of suspension does not disclose that the petitioner was suspended pending enquiry. A perusal of the order of suspension shows that “pending further investigation” into the petitioner’s alleged misconduct, his services are placed under suspension. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is suspended pending enquiry. Inasmuch as, the impugned order is only in the nature of suspension pending enquiry, I am not inclined to interfere with the same. However, the respondents are directed to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the regulations and rules governing the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.10115 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 17th April, 2009 vrn