Crl.R.No.3155 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.R.No.3155 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2010 Tej Pal .....Petitioner v. Swami Financers .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.Nos.62288-89 of 2010 Both the applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.62290 of 2010 and Crl.R.No.3155 of 2010 (O&M) Heard. Notice of motion. Mr.Ranjit Sharma, Advocate, who is present in Court, puts in appearance on behalf of the complainant. It has been stated by counsel for both the parties that dispute between the parties has since been compromised. It is also contended that petitioner-accused has been convicted and sentenced for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which is compoundable and the same has been compounded, vide compromise, Annexure P1. It has also been stated by respondent-complainant that offence has since been compounded and respondent-complainant has received the amount of the cheque, i.e., Rs.20,000/-. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is accepted subject to revision -petitioner's depositing Rs.3000/- with District Legal Services Authority at Karnal, i.e., 15% of the amount of cheque, in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Damodar S.Prabhu v. Crl.R.No.3155 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Sayed Bebalal H. 2010(2) RCR (Criminal) 851. The present revision petitioner is acquitted of the allegations as offence has been compounded. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karnal, is directed to issue release warrant of the revision petitioner forthwith on his depositing of Rs.3,000/-, with District Legal Services Authority at Karnal. 30.11.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge