IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11874 of 2011 MD. MARGHUB ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner being husband of the complainant is languishing in jail custody since 29.12.2010 on the allegation that he used to torture the complainant on account of non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has already divorced the complainant in accordance with Mohammadan law and moreover, he has also transferred some lands in favour of the complainant. On contrary, learned counsel appearing for the complainant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail on the ground of allegation levelled against the petitioner. He filed some documents to prove the alleged cruelty meted out by the petitioner towards complainant. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Complaint Case No. 995 of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)