WP(C) 6746/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Mr. N.K. Barua, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. P. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition i s taken up for disposal at the admission stage. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is that though they have been engaged as Anganwadi Worker and is serving for last more than (twent y two) years, their case on earlier occasion for promotion to the post of Superv isor against the 25% quota has not been considered. The petitioners apprehend th at in the ensuing process of promotion to the post of Supervisor, their case may also not be considered. The petitioners, therefore, pray for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider their case for promotion to the post of Supe rvisor against the quota fixed for that purpose. It is the contention of Ms. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Socia l Welfare Department that if the petitioners come within the zone of promotion, their case would be considered in terms of the guideline and the decision of the Government in that regard. Having regard to the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel appeari ng for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Supervisor against the quota fixed for that purpose and in terms of the service orders formulated in that regard provided the petitioners come within th e zone of consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, without however, any order as to costs.