1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 4668/2008 (Ashok Jethanand Lakhwani VERSUS Commissioner of Police, Nagpur Region & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.D. Khamborkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anand Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-1. Shri S.K. Mishra, counsel for the R-2 to 4. Shri S.A. Kalbande, counsel for the R-5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 09, 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Shri S.K. Mishra, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4 states that this writ petition should not be entertained in view of the alternate efficacious remedy which is available under the provisions of Section 387 of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948. In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 4, Shri N.D. Khamborkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the Commissioner under the provisions of Section 387 of the Act of 1948. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would file the appropriate 2 proceedings within a period of fifteen days from the date of this order. Permission and liberty, both, are granted as prayed for. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE APTE