1512cwp418.11. 1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 418/2011 Shri Arun s/o Pralhad Urade vs. State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Mr. S.P.Gadling, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, APP for R-1 to 5. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & P.B.VARALE,JJ DATE : 15.12.2011 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by which the petitioner prays for initiating departmental action against the respondents viz. Respondents 6 and 7 as these respondents had failed to register a cognizable offence on the basis of the complaint filed by the petitioner on 12.3.2008. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner had submitted a Complaint on 12.3.2008 disclosing the commission of a cognizable offence. The respondents- the erring police officers, in stead of registering a cognizable offence, according to the petitioner, registered a non-cognizable offence. The petitioner, therefore, prays that necessary action, in accordance 1512cwp418.11. 2` with law, be initiated against those police officers. It also appears that the petitioner had submitted a representation on 15.4.2011 praying for the aforesaid relief. 3. On notice of the petition being issued to the respondents, the respondents have filed their affidavit- in-reply. In the affidavit-in-reply it is stated that the respondents have initiated certain inquiry against the erring police officers and after receipt of the report of the said inquiry, action in accordance with law would be initiated. In any event, in the light of the fact that since the respondents have initiated an action against the erring police officers, we are not inclined to interfere in the present petition. This writ petition, being sans merit is, therefore, summarily rejected with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE patle 1512cwp418.11. 3`