1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.(MD).No.8417 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Kanagambal : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District,Sivagangai. 2.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Sarugani,Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the Eviction Notice in Na.Ka.Aa3/6918/2011, dated 22.07.2011 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran R1 to R3 Special Government Pleader ORDER [Order of the Court was made BY P.JYOTHIMANI, J] Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner challenges the impugned notice of the Tahsildar dated 22.07.2011, by which, the Tahsildar, by referring to a representation stated to have been given by the petitioner herself on 04.07.2011 to the District Collector, has directed the Revenue Inspector to conduct enquiry and to find out as to whether the petitioner has committed any encroachment and then, file a report. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has never given any representation to the District Collector at any point of time. However, by mistake, certain reference has been made as if the petitioner has made a representation against herself. 4. Be that as it may, now that it is only a notice given, for which, the petitioner has given her explanation on 25.07.2011, it is ultimately for the Tahsildar to pass appropriate orders. Making it clear https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 that as and when the Tahsildar passes any order, it is always open to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law. Till the Tahsildar passes appropriate final order, it is made clear that the respondents shall not take any coercive action in respect of the possession of the property by the petitioner. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(Writs) /TRUE COPY/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Tahsildar, Devakottai Taluk,Sivagangai District. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Sarugani,Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District. +1cc to Mr.V.Kannan, Advocate SR.No.25403 +1cc to Special Govt.Pleader SR.No.25379 Order made in W.P.(MD).No.8417 of 2011 Dated:- 29.07.2011 SML PA/09.08.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/