IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 2926 of 2010. Decided on: 23.07.2010. ________________________________________________________________ Bhagi Ram. … Petitioner. Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioner had applied for appointment as driver under the respondent-Corporation. It is seen from the communication dated 14th July, 2010 of the Managing Director, which is taken on record, that the petitioner has not cleared the driving test. Therefore, it has become unnecessary to go into the various contentions raised in the writ petition. Those contentions are left open. It is made clear that if the petitioner has still any grievance, it will be open to him to approach the Managing Director in that regard. - 2 - 2. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 23, 2010. (sck/awasthi).