1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.199/2010 [Baban Baliramji Paunikar .vrs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur and others] ................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 24, 2010. Heard Mr. R.M. Daruwala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.A. Mirza, learned APP for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the petition is that although he was granted furlough by the Competent Authority, the surety offered by the petitioner was not accepted by the Tahsildar for the purpose of grant of furlough. The communication of the petitioner discloses that the Tahsildar insisted that the petitioner should furnish surety of Rs.3,000/- and for that purpose, it appears that the petitioner invested Rs.3,000/- in Indira Vikas Patra. 2 Reply filed on behalf of the respondents discloses that the petitioner was released on furlough by order dated 6.4.2010. The petitioner again applied for furlough which is under consideration of the Competent Authority. In view of the above, we do not find any reason to give any direction to the respondents and accordingly the petition is disposed of. The fees of the learned counsel Mr. R.M. Daruwala, who has been appointed to appear on behalf of the petitioner, are quantified at Rs.750/-. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande