('^^ rii IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISl N0. ^^'9 /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^sss^ V^.-:"C^\0 )--y ^-'' ^-' ^0"..^ ,<^ ^y ^^ ya"^ &••" Sachidanand Gupta S/o Shri Mathura Prasad Gupta, Aged about 47 years, R/o Middle School, Udumkela, Menpat, Sitapur, Distt. Surguja-(C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja- (C..G.) BlockEducation Officer Kusmi, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja- (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT INTHE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER f/""* '%. i!? SY ^yf^Si. % g 'iSsSSSs'S] i a «. Oaw1;)' ,ff "•^ "w^ "'^••^2-s^ ^) "TtTif^t,^t^ 1 isJNi:.! H!GH COURT OF GHHATT'SGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4635 OF 2011 Sschlaanand Gucta ay-^^sr^sr^iT'i r^£i^r\ji'^iJt:i^1 Versus State of Chhattisaarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of Incia) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sunii Ofe?/ani, Advocate for fhs petitloner. Shri Arun Sao. Govt. Advocate for the Staie. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed o" this 16 day of August, 2011) 1. By this petmon. the petitioner seeks to chaiienge the iegailtv and vaildltv of the imouaned transfer oraer dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Coilector, Surguja, whersby, the petitioner, working as Head hilasier at Middle Schooi Udumkeia, Mainpat, has been transferred to at the option of the Block Educaiion Orficer, Kusmi, on admjnistrame grounds. At the vew outset. Shri Arun Sao, iearnsd Govt. Advocate submits t'nat via'e cireuiar dafed 05.08.2011 issued by the Tribat Weifa.rs Deoartment snd vide cireular daied 09.08.2011 issued bv the Edacation Deoartment, a!! the transfer orders of Head Mssters. which have been deciared as Ciass-li post, have bsen canceiied. Thus, nothing remains Tor adiudicatlon. 3. ln view of foregoing, learned counssl appearing for the petitioner submlts that nothing sun/ives for adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the wnt peiition stands djsposed of. _,___——-—— 0 SATISH K. ANGNfflOM ashsk