IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 8582 of 2008 Between: Sri padmavathi Colony Welfare Association, rep by its President, C.P.L. Chari S/o C.Veerachary (Late) H. No. 4-7-90/4/4, Sri Padmavathi Colony, Near hayathnagar Bus Depot, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3 Mandal Revenue Inspector, Hayathnagar Mandal Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Sri Kiran, Mandal Revenue Inspector, Hayathnagar Mandal, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of mandamus or any appropriate Writ, or order or direction declaring the high-handed action of the respondents 2 to 4 in trying to demolish the structures raised by the members of the petitioner association situated in respect of in respect of Sy. No. 326 to 330, 332, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344 to 349 admeasurign a total extent of about Ac. 30-00 acres of Anmagal Village, Hayathnagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and vioaltive of principles of natural justice and also art. 19 (1)(g) and 21 of Constitution of India and for a Consequential order directing the respondents to drop all further proceedings including dispossession of the members of the petitioner association situated in the above said land and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.8582 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER Sri Kameswara Rao, Advocate representing Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 16th JUNE 2009 *TSNR