1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1031 OF 2010 Prabhakar Rangu Mhamane & Anr. .. Petitioners versus Anna Kashinath Pawar .. Respondent Mr.Kiran Kumar Phakade for the petitioners. Mr.Milind M. Sathaye for the respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 3rd March 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge by which the petitioners have been directed to restore the electricity connection to the suit premises by giving no objection, if any, required by the office of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. It is directed that on the failure of the petitioners to comply with the direction, it will be open for the respondent- plaintiff to apply for restoration of the electricity supply. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that constituted attorney of the petitioners who has affirmed the petition is present. He states that an application has been made by the 2nd petitioner for restoration of the electricity supply in terms of the impugned order. He has 2 tendered on record a xerox copy of a Firm Quotation signed by the Junior Engineer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. On instructions, he states that the supply will be restored within a period of four weeks from today. 3. Thus, the petitioners have shown willingness to comply with the impugned order by making an application for grant/restoration of electricity supply to the suit premises. Time of four weeks deserves to be granted to the petitioners to comply with the impugned order either by restoring the original supply or by getting new connection. If supply is not restored within four weeks, it will be open for the respondent to apply for new electricity connection to the suit premises and the petitioners will be under an obligation to sign all requisite documents for that purpose. 4. Hence, the petition is disposed of by passing the following order: : O R D E R : (a) The statements made by the petitioners through their constituted attorney are accepted. (b) Time of four weeks is granted to the petitioners to get of the electricity supply to the suit premises restored. (c) If supply to the suit premises is not restored within four weeks or if new electricity connection is not made available within four weeks, it will be open for the respondent to immediately apply to the concerned 3 authority for grant of electricity supply to the suit premises. The petitioners shall be under obligation to sign all requisite documents to enable the respondent to apply for and obtain electricity supply. (d) On being called upon in writing by the respondent, the petitioners will sign and execute the requisite documents within a period of one week from the date on which requisition/request is received from the respondent-plaintiff. In such event, it is made clear that the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd will grant supply in accordance with rules notwithstanding the pendency of the suit. (e) Hearing of the suit is expedited. (f) The trial Court will endeavour to conclude the trial on or before 31st October 2010. (g) The application made by the respondent under Order XXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 will not proceed for a period of six weeks from today. (h) Writ petition is disposed of in above terms. (A.S.OKA,J)