IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 5407 of 2009(U) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ARUNA, D/O. LATE M.V. ANTONY AND WIFE OF JAMES, AGED 40, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. BY MR.A.BALAGOPALAN, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. M.N. DASAN, SON OF LATE NARAYANAN, AGED ABOUT 80, MATTAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 2. LAND TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM, MINI CIVIL STATION, THRIPPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM. 3. GEORGE PRAKASH, S/O. LATE M.V. ANTONY, AGED 50, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 4. PREMA JAMES, D/O. LATE M.V. ANTONY AND WIFE OF JAMES, AGED 48, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 5. SAJAN THOMAS, S/O. LATE M.V. ANTONY, AGED 45, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 6. DEEPAN, S/O. LATE M.V. ANTONY, AGED 43, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. W.P.(C) No.5407/2009 ...2... 7. NEENA HANSON, W/O. LATE HASNSON, AGED 42, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. 8. ANTONY HANSON, S/O. LATE HASNSON, AGED 20, MANNULLIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 20. BY MR. P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.5407 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, there are errors apparent on the face of Ext.P1, and therefore, she has filed Ext.P2 seeking review of the said order. Orders have not been passed on Ext.P2 and it is with this grievance, this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated above, Ext.P2 filed by the petitioner for modification of Ext.P1 has been received and is pending, the same shall be considered with notice to the other contesting parties and orders shall be passed thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. It is clarified that this Court has not examined the maintainability of Ext.P2. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg