BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Friday, the Twenty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD)No.14005 of 2011 1 M. ALAGAMMAI 2 V. RAJAMANI :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.2&3 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CR NO. 20/2011. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. L.SHAJI CHELLAN Advocate For Respondent : Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- Apprehending arrest, the petitioners, in Crime No.20 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code, have come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the de-facto complainant's daughter, by name, Sohee Bhuvaneswarai, was kidnapped by the first accused with the help of these petitioners. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners has produced an order passed by the Division Bench of this court in HCP(MD)No.807 of 2011, dated 18.10.2011, wherein, the Division Bench of this Court has recorded that the victim Bhuvaneswari was produced before the Division Bench of this Court and she stated that she was 23 years old and she married the first accused on 11.07.2011 itself. 4.It is also brought to the notice of this court that both the first accused and the victim girl are postgraduates. Having regard to the above statement made by the alleged victim that she was not kidnapped and she went on her own accord to marry the first accused, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionthat the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupuluosly. sd/- 21/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Karaikudi, Sivagangai. +2. CC to M/S. L.SHAJI CHELLAN Advocate SR.No.36690. RP/21.10.2011/1P/7C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14005 of 2011, Date:21/10/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/