Qs^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: PETITIONER F "< RESPONDENTS .f??, HON'BLESHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. W.P.(P.I.L.lNo. 5479 of 2008 L.N. Kesharwani, S/o. Shri P.P. Kesharwani, aged about 36 years, Advocate, R/o. R. Deendayal Puram Colony,LIG-10, Raigarh, Tahsll and District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus 1. The State of Chhattlsgarh through the Chief Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Secretary, Department of General Administration, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 4. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh 5. Chief Executive Offlcer, Zila Panchayat RaigaFh,DistriGt Raigarh(C.G.) 6. Public Information Officer, Zila Panchayat (D.R.D.A.) Raigarh (C.G.) 7. Shri Dheeraj Singh Thakur, S/o. Govind Singh Thakur, Stenographer, Posted at Collectorate, Raigarh, District Raigartll (C.G.), R/o. Railway BanglaparaiM Raigarh, Tahsil and District RaigartilJB Writ Petition underArticle22£oftheConstjftrtionoUndia -a va Present: Shri R. Pradhan, leamed counsel forthe p^titioner. j|| Shri J.K.Gilda, leamedAdditfonalAdvocatie General IB for fhe State/ respondents No. 1 to 4. m v ,;^^^ SBi :yaa bl ]3^' ^ padma .f- tth ORDER (29"' September, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri R. Pradhan, teamed counsel for the petitloner, in view of the dictum of the Apex Court in the case of Gurpal Smgh Vs. State of Punjab, holding that a writ petition in the form of 'Public Interest Litigafion' Is not maintainable in the service roatter, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition filal by the petitioner styled as 'Public Interest Litigation'. 2) Permisslon granted. 3) The writ petition, therefore, !s dismlssed as withdrawn. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SuinlKninarsinha Judge l'rl|N'!r-»^..; ^.: