IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13850 of 2010 1. DILIP MUKHIYA, S/o Ramdeo Mukhiya. 2. Savitri Devi, W/o Ramdeo Mukhiya. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 03. 23.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the allegation against the petitioners is only of having caught hold of the deceased whereas the allegation of assault is upon co- accused, Ramdeo Yadav, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 123 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the 2 petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)