^r :1 IN THE HIGH COBRT OF <reDICAT8RE AT BII>ASPBR( CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION- N0< AO o3 OP 2003 / PETITIONER : Radbey s'hyam tJike son e£ late shri Ghan sai'Sike, aged about 27 years. resident o£ Vlliage Bakulwati. Teltsil Narayanpur, Distriet-Bastar,(C.G« VBR S I? S ^^^^s^.V^ ^g^Tg:^:"^ ?^-' KESPONDEKTS .«•• s l* State of Ciiliattlsgarla, ^toreugli Secrefeary, Ad.UniTai.Anusucb.It Jata. Piebfada Varg Evaro Alg Sanklayak, ChhattJ.sgarb.Raipur. (C»G») i0^''.\-^-'' /e.^^^'^'" ;':^'S>*1%2** 8 2* DePutYcomra-i-ssioner, • .^<\^\c^ A<?-lm- JatA.Anusuchit Jati ^s\\c?' ^^y ?L'.6^V '^'^ ^6' ^' a- ^ 'T/ ,»rf' / ^ /-•'y' Pichhda Varg Evam Aip Saakhyak, ehlaatt.tsgarla,Ka.i.pur,(Ci(a3») »3.Assistant Commissioner, Adiwasi Vikas.^agdalpur,Distrlct- Bastar,(C.G«) s4. Collector,Bastar, District Bastar,(C.S.) s 5» Bloek Division Education Offieer, Adiwas-i. VJ.kas.Block NarayanpUB, Tehs.i.1 Narayanpar,D.i.stri.et-Bastar(C.O») ^^r»'*\ WRIT .PBTITION SNBER ARTICIBS 226/227 OF THE )!- „' 'l I'VI.^ sr^^ it \\ COHSTITBTION 0V INDIA.. »W<N> aa XI-HC-22 ^^••qraRTa, -g^frOTS, wtinr aiw^ ..y..'..f^. .^.9.:..?.?.^^°3° 3T[^[q?r' R;-fi?ii sn^?f grqwgfsn ^ 311^1'g^iiwgitg ^iFfeiiH'WRtf'? fs^t ^TSR^R ^a'P'msn^i 21-12-2005 Petitioner by ShriwAi. £v\A'rq 'p.J Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel LawyerJ fcji^' Advocate. for the State. Heard. This case relates to compassion^te appointment consequent upon the death of an employee serving in the State. Learned counsel for the petitioneij categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 1 -j11 -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing W. P. No. 1322/^002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He" Iprays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. ' I Learned counsel for the State doe^ not dispute the above fact and state that the State' of Chhattisgarh has taken a deoision to oonsjder the cases of dependants of thosi employees who died on orafter 1/11/19^7 strictly in accordance with the poltoy prevalent at thattime. I In view of the submissions mac|e by learned oounsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the m^rits ofthe case, in the opinion ofthis Court, ends of justice wjlt be served ffa direotion is giv^n to the State 6f Chhattisgarh and the authorities ooncerned to consider and decide the c^se of the petitioner jn accordance with the poticy prevalent at the time of death of the err^plpyee conoemed. If the petitioner found eligible, appointment orders wiil be issued as esjrly as possible on or before 30 April, 2006. The petitioner is alsp direoted to render due c^-operation to the authorities. It is made clearthat if any grievance still remains, the petitior|er may avail the remedy a\@ilable under the law including filing ofthe petition-before this (pourt. With the aforesaid obseru'ations, t|iis petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. . 1 Copy to the State counsel, who| will be obliged to communicate the order to the respondentsfor oampliance. I ———— Sd/- Fakhruddin -- Judge ' J'S&^L^HH^