IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.30 of 2007 NAGENDRA SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 23.7.2008 Heard the parties. In the instant case petitioner is the father of one of the accused namely Amit Sahni and his prayer is that the case may be investigated by any other agency not below the rank of Dy. Superintendent of Police as chargesheet has been submitted against the two accused Amit Sahni and Ganesh Sahni by respondent no.6 without doing proper investigation. However, he admits that chargesheet has been submitted against the accused persons and cognizance for offence has also been taken. He submits that the chargesheet has been submitted merely on the basis of material referred to in the supervision note which cannot be looked into for the purpose of sending up the accused for trial. He prays for investigation of the case by a police officer not below the rank of Dy Superintendent of Police so that the accused may get justice in the case. Learned State counsel has filed a counter-affidavit and has stated in para-8 of the same that police has also found the case true against Amit Sahni and Ganesh Sahni apart from accused Sanjay Sahni. As chargesheet has been submitted and cognizance for offence has also been taken, the relief in respect of investigation of the case by any other agency is uncalled for in the facts and circumstances - 2 - of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner, if so advised , may move appropriate application under the law against the order taking cognizance. In view of the above, I do not find any cogent reasons to allow the prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly this application is dismissed. sudip ( S. P. Singh, J )