IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3698 of 2009 KHAIRU NISHA, WIFE OF LATE NIZAMUDDIN, R/O VILAGE-BABHNI, POLICE STATION- KARGARH, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. …………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. AMIR SUBHANI, THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. ANUPAM KUMAR, THE COLLECTOR, ROHTAS 4. D.D.S DHARIWAL, THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. …………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 03/ 17.03.2011 Heard Mr. Hemendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pawan Kumar Choudhary, A.C to G.A-IX. Mr. Singh would submit that though in terms of the order of this Court, an order has been passed by the authority but then the said order is wholly mechanical and in fact perverse and accordingly he has assailed the same by filing an interlocutory petition being I.A No. 5878 of 2010. In the considered opinion of this Court, this fact is admitted that the authority has passed its order in terms of the direction issued by this Court, the correctness of such order cannot be gone into within the narrow scope and limited parameters of contempt jurisdiction. Whether such order is correct on fact or sustainable in law can be made the subject matter of 2 only a fresh proceeding. That being so, the prayer made in I.A No. 5878 of 2010 for assailing the order in question dated 04.01.2010, passed in compliance of the order passed by this Court dated 02.02.2009 in C.W.J.C No. 4306 of 2005 is hereby rejected. Such rejection however, would not stand in way of the petitioner to take appropriate steps as against the aforementioned order dated 04.01.2010, as is available to him in law. As noted above the order of this Court being confined only to disposal of representation and payment of admissible amount, if any, and that part of the order has already been complied with by the admitted disposal of the representation holding inter alia that petitioner is not entitled to any payment. In that view of the matter, this application has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly with a liberty to the petitioner to assail the resultant order before appropriate forum. With the aforesaid observations and liberty, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha,J) 3