IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1931 WA.No. 1829 of 2006() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35947/2005 Dated 22/12/2005 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ YAKOOB, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.KOYAKUTTY, CHANDUVEETTIL HOUSE, CHETTIPPADI P.O., PARAPPANANGADI. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, FONDI AUTOMOBILE BUILDING, U.P.HILL, MALAPPURAM. ADV. SRI.MATHEW JACOB THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.1829 of 2006 .................................................................... Dated this the 10th day of November, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Appeal is filed against judgment of the learned Single Judge holding that civil suit is the remedy for getting compensation for theft of appellant's autorickshaw which was stated to be insured with the United Indian Insurance Company. Even though counsel submitted that being a Public Sector Company the appellant's claim should have been considered in a fair and reasonable manner, we notice from Ext.P5 that the company has closed the claim for want of production of documents called for from the appellant vide Ext.P4. Further, it is seen that the appellant did not press the claim before the company. Even though this is denied by the counsel for the appellant, we do not think it 2 possible for this court to decide the issue without enquiry in writ proceedings. We, therefore, dismiss the Writ Appeal. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge V.K.MOHANAN Judge pms