WP(C) 2337/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. M. U. Mondal, learned counsel, for the petitioners, and Mr. B.J. Ghosh , learned Govt. Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents. The petitioners came to this Court with the present application, made under Arti cle 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the respondents’ decision to g o for recruitment to the posts of A.B. constables in Assam Police by means of an advertisement, issued on 08.02.2010, the grievances of the petitioners being th at they had already participated in the selection process for the posts of A.B. constable and that they were interviewed with effect from 01.08.2008 to 13.08.20 08, but the select list had not been published and without publication of the se lect list, the respondents could not have, and ought not to have, published the advertisement, dated 08.02.2010, inviting applications afresh for the posts of A .B. constable. Appearing on behalf of the respondents, Mr. Ghosh, learned Govt. Advocate, has p roduced a communication, dated 31.07.2010, which shows that the select list has been directed by the respondents to be published. In fact, it is submitted by th e learned Govt. Advocate that the select list has already been published and thi s fact is not disputed on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the above, this writ petition is closed with direction to the respond ents to take necessary action, in accordance with law, following publication of the select list. The interim directions, passed in this case, on 30.04.2010, sha ll accordingly stand vacated. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall stand dispo sed of. No costs.