HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petitlon (S) No. 612 of 2007 '"/\~ ^- 1) 2) 3) 4) Sunit Kumar Patel, S/o. Shri Shuam Sumder Patei agsd about 40 years, Assistant Teacher Posted at Govt. Higher Secondatry Sc'nool Nandeli, Dist. Raigarh, CG. Yogesh Patei, S/o. Shri Jawahar Patel, aged about 42 years, Assistant Tsacher, Posted at Govt. Higher Secondary School Nandeli, Dist. Raigarh, CG.. Raman La! Yadav S/o. Shri GhhaduRam Yadav, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Posted at Govt. Middle School Thakurdiya, lock Kharsiya, Dist. Raigarh, CG. Sai Gave! S./o. Shri Jagdish Prasad Gavel aaed about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Posted at Primary. Schooi Turekeia B!ock - Kharsiya, Dist. Raigarh, CG. Chandrashekhar Patel S/o. Shri Jagat Ram Pate!, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher posted at Govt. Primary School, Kuiba, Tahsi! & Dist. Raigarh, f^/^ ^^.3. iirt Lai Sahu, S/o. Shri Ratiram S.ahu, aged about 39 years, posted as Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary Schoo! Bhadrapail, Tahsil & Dist. Raigarh, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Education Department, D.KS.. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. -1>- '^ Kl ^: 2) 3) Director Pubiic instruction Department, Raipur, CG. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, CG. 4) Dy. Director Education Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh, ^r^ 0^.3, (Writ Petition under Artfcle 226 ofthe Constitution of tndia for issuance of writ jn nature of certiorari, mandamus, prohibltion and ofher suitabi'e writ or writs, direction or direcfions, order or orders). (SB: Hon'bte Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) Shri R.S. Patei, counsei for the petitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. 2, 3. (Passed on 23r April2007] The question of iaw involved herein as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initia! appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law invoived in the present writ petition are t'ne same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 7002 of 2006 (Yogeshwar Prasad Patanwar Vs. State Govt of Chhatttsgarh & others), which was disposed of vide ordsr dated 15-12-20W. 1n view of the above stated submission made by iearned counsei for the parties, the writ petition is dispossd of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Safish K. Agi Judge Raju L-