1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 8025/2010 Suresh Gurjar & anr Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr RR Sharma - for the petitioners Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are, in fact, innocent persons. There are labourers and work on daily basis. They were engaged to work only for two days. They have been falsely implicated in this matter. Hence, petitioners deserve to be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that petitioners were found at the place of occurrence where adulteration in eatables was being done. The matter is under investigation. It is a serious matter. This kind of 2 act is increasing day by day. Hence, petitioners may not be enlarged on bail. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. However, petitioners would be at liberty to file a fresh bail application, on submission of charge sheet, before the trial court. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma