IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.40201 OF 2008 SATYAVRATA @ KUNUD LAL, SON OF LATE BHUNESHWAR NATH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARA KHARAUNI, POLICE STATION BEHIA, DISTRICT BHOJPUR VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NEERAJ KUMAR 3. AWANEESH KUMAR 2 AND 3 ARE SONS OF LATE AKHAURI JAGDESHWAR PANDEY @ JAGDESHWAR NATH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BARA KHARAUNI, POLICE STATION BEHIA, DISTRICT BHOJPUR ********** FOR THE PETITIONER :- MR. MURARI NARAYAN CHOUDHARY, ADV. FOR THE S T A T E :- MR. RAM ANURAG SINGH, A.P.P. ***** 3 02/08/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 09.08.2008 passed in Criminal Revision No. 107 of 2007 by which the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. II, Ara has upheld the order dated 02.07.2007 passed in Complaint Case No. 900 (C) of 2007 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ara has dismissed the complaint petition. On perusal of the orders impugned, it appears that the money was demanded for unlawful purposes, which in itself was a good reason for dismissing the complaint. Besides which, it would appear that the complainant and his witnesses together have filed about 25 cases against several persons in the locality, a list of which was supplied to the Additional Sessions Judge, 2 Fast Track Court No. II, Ara. All these cases are pending in the Court at Ara and as such it is the matter of record and therefore, could have been looked by the Courts below. It appears that this complaint petition is malicious, vexatious and has been filed to put pressurize the petitioners to compromise Title Suit No. 218 of 2008 pending between the complainant and the petitioner and his family. In the circumstances, I find no reason to interfere with the orders impugned. This application is dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)