IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 3262 of 2007 Date of Decision : 02.03.2007 Veerpal Kaur ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. .. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral) The petitioner applied for appointment as Physical Training Instructor in response to an advertisement issued by the Education Department on 01.10.2006. According to the petitioner, her merit is higher than a large number of candidates selected by the respondents for appointment against the post of Physical Training Instructor. In furtherance of the action of the respondents in declaring the result vide Annexure P/5, in terms of the requirement indicated therein, the petitioner made a grievance of her superior claim through e-mail. The e-mail submitted by the petitioner for consideration at the hands of the respondents, was responded to on 28.11.2006. The petitioner was informed, that her claim was subject matter of consideration, and she should wait for a final communication in that behalf. It is the vehement contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that no further communication has been addressed to the petitioner despite the aforesaid response through e-mail dated 28.11.2006. In the background factual position noticed above, learned CWP No. 3262 of 2007 2 counsel for the petitioner states, that the petitioner will be satisfied, if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 i.e. the Director, Public Instructions (Schools), Punjab, requiring him to take a final decision on the complaint addressed by her, wherein she claimed a higher position in the merit list. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition, by directing respondent No.2 i.e. the Director, Public Instructions (Schools), Punjab, to communicate the final decision taken by the authorities, in furtherance of the e-mail despatched to the petitioner on 28.11.2006. Needful shall be done within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Disposed of accordingly. Order dasti on payment of usual charges. ( J.S. Khehar ) Judge March 02, 2007 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge