IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4685 of 2007 BASUDEO MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 20.4.2010. Heard Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Binod Kumar, learned Assisting Counsel to SC-1 for the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General. The writ petition was filed for recalculation of the provident fund amount of the petitioner who superannuated from the post of Assistant Teacher, Government Middle School, Bangalwa of Dharahra Block, Munger with effect from 31.1.2004. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though an amount of Rs.2,48,068/- was paid to the petitioner by way of provident fund but the same was without any calculation chart. It is in this back-ground that the writ petition was filed. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Provident Fund Officer, Munger showing the calculative details of the amount of provident fund of the petitioner. The enclosure to the counter affidavit redresses the grievance of the petitioner as prayed in the writ petition. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the 2 petitioner, if he feels aggrieved by the calculation of the principal and/or the interest amount, to raise his grievance before the respondent District Provident Fund Officer, Munger and who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)