1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.17/2010 Sunil Ambar Patil Age 33 years, Occ-Business R/o Pakhali-Kuwa Near Amrut Talkies, Nandurbar Tq. & Dist.Nandurbaf. .. PETITIONER [ORIG.COMPLAINANT] VS Prabhudas Holaram Puraswani Age 37 years, Occ-Pantry-car waiter R/o Old Sindhi Colony,Nandurbar Tq. & Dist.Nandurbar. .... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for petr. Shri Vijay Sharma,Adv.for R. ... CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.18/2010 Kiran Ambar Patil .. PETITIONER VERSUS Shaikh Shabbir s/o Shaikh Siraj .. RESPONDENT ... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for petitioner. ... CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.19/2010 Giridhar Bhagwan Marathe .. PETITIONER VERSUS 2 Prabhudas Holaram Puraswani .. RESPONDENT ... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for petr Shri Vijay Sharma,Adv.for Respdt. .... CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.20/2010 Kiran s/o Ambar Patil .. PETITIONER Vs Sunil Shantaram Sawant. .. RESPONDENT ... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for Petr Shri R.V.Gore,Adv.for R. ... CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.44/2010 Sunil Ambar Patil .. PETITIONER Vs Sunil Shantaram Sawant. .. RESPONDENT .... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for Petr Shri R.V.Gore,Adv.for R. .... CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.426/2010 Kiran Ambar Patil .. PETITIONER 3 Vs Sayyad Mukhtar s/o Sayyad Ahmed .. RESPONDENT ... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for petr .... CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.427/2010 Kiran Ambar Patil .. PETITIONER Vs Sayyad Mukhtar s/o Sayyad Ahmed .. RESPONDENT ... Shri H.V.Tungar,Adv.for petr ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : 25/01/2011. 1] Heard Shri Tungar for the petitioner. 2] An application was moved before the learned J.M.F.C. in respective proceedings filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, placing reliance to the judgment in the matter of Maharaja Developers and another V/s Udaysing Pratapsinghrao Bhonsle and another reported in 2007 ALL MR(Cri) 1339 and the rejection of said application is questioned before the Court. 4 3] The position of law is now clear in view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the matter of Rajesh Bhalchandra Chalke V/s State of Maharashtra and another reported in 2011 All MR (Cri) 64. In para 55 this Court has over-ruled the judgment in the matter of Maharaja Developers. 4] In view of the above developments in the matter, the application moved before learned J.M.F.C. which was rejected, subject of present proceeding has become infructuous, consequently, all Writ Petitions are disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.) umg/criwp17-10