" r%^'..'"• ^ -Jl IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH ATBUASPUR W.P.(S.INO. ^ / 2009 PETITIONER: ^,^ ,^1-" b ^-?" ^ Mohit Lal Chouhan S/o Late Sirkolo Chouhan, Aged about 64 years, Retired Head Master, R/o Village Madhopali, Post Dansara, Tahsil Sarangarh Distt-Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^-3. ^A. State of Chhattis^arh Through : The Secretary^ School Educatonal Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.j Joint Director Treasury Accounts aiid Pension Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.) District EducatioiL Qfficer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Educatioa Officer^ Bk)ck Sarangarh, Distt Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOJ^ UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA FORISSUANCE OF WRIT m NATURE OF .MANDAMUS CERTLORARY OR ANY QTHERWRLT OF UKE NATURE £TC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON rS) No. 5978 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Mohit Lal Chouhan. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri D.R,Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Shi-i A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 22nd day ofOctober, 2009) Wifh fhe consent ofleamed counsel appearing for th^ parties, the matter is heard fmally. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner sybmits that the case, being payment of retu'al benefits matter, may be referred to the p^nsion committee. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Bmjmth Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Coimnittee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts vvere involved. The Conuiiittee was constituted by the State Goveiiiment, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chmdrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed m M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh <& Others v. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus; this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra} as submitted by leamed counsel appearing for the parties. 3. With the consent ofthe parties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office ofthe Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, m accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documents^ if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retkal dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period offour months fi'om the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. Tlie petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to tlie leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for foi-warding the same to the Coxiimittee. —-— — Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit