<U,U«a»,*.»»- . w^.<i»»»»l L\<0.'3J..b"^-r-7:"%4a (,R.NO...^^^:^.^.-"'^^ ^^sssx drted....-'^-^''"^""' >•*•" k (/^ 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WMTPETITIOItNo.^l^t /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDBNTS ^ 1- 2- Khonte Tigga S/o. Late Latta Tigga, Aged about 51 years, working as Head Master, Primary_,^Sjchool- Patharal,BIock-^Batauli, District- jurguja-(Chhattisgarh), R/o. Village Basin, Post- Sedam, Block- Batauli, District- Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhatdsgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Mucation, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). District Mucation Officer, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). / 3- District CoUector, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAM ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDEROF LIKE NATURE ETC. j* XI-HC-78 WH'rtl a-iNltfi 3^ '^[•illd'4, 8'Tnu'IS, (sldl^y .^. W[ 200 aii^i <^ach (•ici!3°«i.ff) SIT^T qiT R^icb crar an^r ginNi SfSW_ <So Oti ?T(TTW flfsiT an^T 11-8-; Advitcate idt Mr. Mahendra Dubey, counsel| Mr. Sumesh Baiai, Govt. on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition urt f-ft?" India, the petitioner has chailenged h] P-1) passed by respondent No.3, wl^ from Primary School, Pathrai to Districjt Learned counsel for the petiti^ his wife are posted at the same plac| they are being disturbed. Learned i| may be allovi/ed to make a represen) No.1 be directed to decide the same, State/ respondents has no objection. Having heard learned counsel| and circumstances of the case and w| of the case, the prayer made by learpji just, fair and reasonabie. ThereTore, |1 representation to respondent No.1 raij the instant writ petition and its annexi)i and in turn, respondent No.l is di one month from the date of its receiF|t the petitioner in an objective manner, With the aforesaid direction, tht Consequentiy, M.C.A/.)P.No.32^ Parties are entitled for certifiedl tllltCT'ifl-l t|IHMTffte^<.Rlt&K ^;3I&T3TI^T for the petitioner. for the State/respandents No.1 to 3, |der Article 226/227 of the Constitution of ^ trgnsfer order dated 7-7-2006 (Annexure |ereby the petitioner has been transferred fi Education Officer, Ramanujganj. ^ner submits th.at the petitioner as well as ^ and due to the impugned transfer order, ];ounsel further submits that the petitioner iation to respondent No.1 and respondent ^o which learned counsei appearing for the redted for the parties, hawng regard to the facts thout expressing any opinion on the merits ed counsei for the petitioner appears to be he petitioner is allowed to make a detailed sing all his grievances^annexing a copy of ires within a period of ten days from today to decide the same within a period of •t, considering all the grievances raised by in its own merits, in accordance with law. s writ petition stands disposed of. i5/2006 also stands disposed of. copy of this order. L.C. Judge P.T.O. j*-