FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REV .APPLICATION NO.406 OF 2009 Nitin Vishnu Kokate Vs. Mrs.Vaishnavi Nitin Kokate & Anr. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.U.B.Nighot for applicant Mr.Milind Deshmukh for respondent No.1 Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 4th February 2010. PC :­ 1. Heard Mr.Nighot for petitioner husband. With his assistance, I have perused the order of the family court, awarding maintainance on an application under section 125 of Cr.P.C. to the wife and minor daughter. The quantum determined is reasonable and has been so determined after taking into account all facts and circumstances, including oral and documentary evidence on record. On both points framed for determination, learned Judge has observed that wife has proved her case. Even the quantum is not so excessive or arbitrarily determined so as to warrant interference in this Court s revisional ’ jurisdiction. Application is, therefore, dismissed. However, it would be open for the applicant to apply to the trial court for modification of the order and if such an application is made, then, the trial court to consider the same in accordance with law. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)