IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15228 of 2007 Date of decision : 25.1.2011 Kavinder Kumar and others Vs. State of Punjab and others. CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Sr.DAG, Punjab. Mr.Mandeep Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr.D.K.Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.4. * * * Permod Kohli, J . Petitioners in this petition are seeking their adjustment on the post held by them on contract basis even after their regular appointment. Insofar as petitioner Nos.13 and 15 are concerned, they are seeking adjustment in block Faridkot. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 has made a statement at bar that two of the petitioners at serial No.13 and 15 namely Sanjeev Kumar and Rajinder Kaur stands already adjusted in block Faridkot. As regards petitioner nos.14 and 16, it is further stated that as and when any vacancy is available in block Faridkot, they will also be adjusted in future. Petitioner Nos.1 to 12 are seeking their adjustment in Block Ferozepur. Mandeep Sharma, Advocate appearing for respondent No.3 has also made a statement that respondent No.3 is willing to adjust the petitioners in Block Ferozepur subject to availability of vacancy. It is stated that as on date, no vacancy is available. However, as and when vacancy (ETT teacher) will be available in block Ferozepur, the petitioners No.1 to 12 shall also be adjusted on the basis of their seniority against those available vacancies. Further submission is that respondent No.2 will adjust the petitioners on the post of their choice subject to availability of the post in near future. In view of the above statements made by respondents No.3 and 4, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.3 and 4 to CWP No.15228 of 2007 make adjustment of the petitioners in their respective blocks on availability of the vacancies in district Ferozepur on the posts held by them on contract basis. Petitioners No.1 to 12 will give their options to respondent No.3 within a period of one month. Depending upon the availability of the vacancy, respondent No.3 will adjust the petitioners from time to time. Respondent No.4 will also adjust petitioners No.14 and 16 in block Faridkot subject to availability of vacancy in future. (Permod Kohli) Judge 25.01.2011 sd 2