IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2011 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 16836 of 2004(D) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SAMBASIVAN S., FACULTY MEMBER (BRANCH MANAGER), L.I.C. OF INDIA, SALES TRAINING CENTRE, KOZHIKODE. BY SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, YOGAKSHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, P.B.NO.19953, MUMBAI, PIN-400 021, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE ZONAL MANAGER, L.I.C. OF INDIA, SOUTHERN ZONAL OFFICE, ANNASALAI, CHENNAI. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, SALES TRAINING CENTRE (KERALA), L.I.C. OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE CAMPUS, P.B.NO.177, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE-673 001. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.E.SUBRAMANI SRI.S.EASWARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.16836/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. P&IR DATED 16/7/2002 SENT BY THE SR.DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC TO THE PETITIONER. P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23/3/2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R3 P3 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03/4/2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P4 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12/5/2004 ISSUED BY R3 TO THE PETITIONER. P5 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 28/2/2004 ISSUED BY LIC RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 16836 of 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order transferring him from the Marketing side to the Administrative side and prays for a direction to the respondents to continue him as Branch Manager (Development). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents it is categorically stated that the petitioner was not subjected to any reversion and he has been given posting in the same scale of pay. Therefore, I do not find any merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv W.P.(C). No. -:2:-