E? EH CGURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRH‘ PETYUON No. 5633 0f23'05 AL Regiorla} Trarisport Amnm‘ity‘ CimattiSgafh, Raipur (CG) PQTTE‘IGREER : NPBewangan. S/o Shii KREewaogao, Aged agout 1 .“ "9 J} wars, T)/ wo Viu‘ 11 a; D 7%fogf oumung, C‘ 1 W visa $4 Drarg (CG-J VERSUS RES? NEENTS : 1. SECI‘etaxy,R.T.A.Raipur{C.G.) N 3. harsh Kumai‘ Jaggi Cfo Maia Badal Kashyap, Ganj Para, Shakii Chowraha. Burg) Dim. Burg (CG-3 PETETEC‘: T LEDER ARTECLES 226/227 OF THE CONS'I‘EWJHON OF INDL’ & ’ Satish K. Acnihsix‘E J. dis: Emi’kie Sm? ive}: Verma. Advocate fer the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakui‘, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. E and. smama {9mm t ,4 p mag) (P gmzu A 0:1 ’VF Lu uay 01 August; ‘ Laamed counsel appearing f0r {ha peiitioner submizS pursuani to the oréer dais-Li 29m Juale, 2001 gassed in WP. No. 974 of 2&31, a memo IWWJ' ’Hm October 70% {Agumww REG) *k s 115d 12‘ the raspondam’ No. 1 to 1116 petitioner whereby the peationer was restrainod from giyéng hiS ’ous uncier regular pexmié Number 28/2GG5. The saici order ie. foe order éated 25th Ociooer, 2%5 (Annexure PB) is under shaiEeage m tois , peiioion. §' Y “why“ 4.4., q y V “(noun Shri Vemm furaher submits since the Oi‘cier dated 29 {h June, 2001 pegged io WE No. 2W4 of 26m has been vaca‘ged Vida order daied 20 t.‘3 Augtist. 2%9 21 ihing sm‘vives for adjuoication a‘i this siege. Leamecl oouxise} appearing for the Statefi‘espondems 1 and 2 doee not eomroveit i1 e sa€d submission. iii View of’ihe foregoi’rxg, the petition is disposed of. Sd/— ’ Saukh K. Agnihom'i Judge ..