IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.691 of 2009 Umesh Kumar s/o late Jalim Prasad Yadav, r/o village – Alawalpur, P.O. Bela Taradhi, P.S. Naubatpur, District – Patna ………….. Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary Human Resources and Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna 3. District Superintendent of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. Block Extension Education Officer, Naubatpur Block, Patna 5. Block Development officer, Naubatpur Block, Patna 6. Panchayat Sevak, Naubatpur Block, Patna 7. Mukhiya Raj Devra Panchayat, Naubatpur, Patna …………….. Respondents ----------- For the appellant: Mr. Birendra Narayan Sharma, Advocate For the State: Mr. K.P.Gupta, SC – V --- 2 13/7/2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. As per policy of the State regularization and continuity of service was provided to all such legally appointed and working Panchayat Shichaks on the post of Panchyat Shiksha Mitra/Prakhand Shichaks who were working on the date of enforcement of the Rules of 2006, that is, 1.7.2006. The writ court did not interfere in the matter because it found that the petitioners were appointed only till 26.1.2005 and thereafter they had not been given any 2 extension as per letter till 1.7.2006. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance upon the office order dated 1.8.2008 issued from the office of District Superintendent of Education, Patna contained in Annexure 9 to this memorandum of appeal. That office order is to provide relief only to those who were working on 1.7.2006 but were subsequently removed on account of requirement of a particular educational qualification which was subsequently relaxed. The case of the appellant does not come under the purview of said office order. We find no merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Neyaz/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Anjana Prakash, J.)