AB 1635/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. Z. Alam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K. Munir, learned Addl. PP for the State respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioners impressed upon the Court that the first informant is not illegally married, though a statement to the effect has been ma de in the FIR that marriage was solemnized by observing certain social customs o f the Karbi Community, in the context of the allegation that the marriage was no t solemnized between the petitioner No.1 and the first informant. The case diary is carefully perused. From the perusal of the statement of the witnesses record ed under the provision of Section 161 Cr.P.C. it appears that the marriage was n ot socially performed in order to have a claim that the first informant is legal ly married wife. That apart, in FIR, they allege some ill-treatment within the purview of Section 498A IPC. It is made clear by order dated 13.6.2011 that the petitioners were granted interim bail in view of the facts involved in the case and the same is further extended till 8.8.2011 during which time the petitioners shall approach the Court of the Deputy Commissioner, Karbi Anglong and would a pply for regular bail. The bail application stands disposed of.