HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION No. 4068 of 2002 DATED 18th October, 2011 BETWEEN K.Neelamma …….Petitioner and Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Rep. by its Registrar, Hyderabad, and ors. …… Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION No. 4068 of 2002 ORDER: Questioning the action of the respondent- University in regularizing the services of the third respondent in the vacancy earmarked for BC-D group as illegal and contrary, the present Writ Petition is filed. The petitioner and third respondent were engaged in the respondent-University as Casual Laborers. It is the case of the petitioner that she belonged to BC-D group whereas the third respondent belonged to BC-B group. It is the grievance of the petitioner that when the respondent-University took steps to regularize the services of the Casual Labour in the vacancy that earmarked for BC-D group, the third respondent’s name was shown at Sl.No. 29 in the seniority list, who produced a false Community Certificate claiming herself to be BC-D group in order to get her services regularized. It is stated that though several representations were submitted to the respondent-University bringing the said facts to its notice, no action had been taken so far and instead, the University authorities are taking active steps to regularize the services of the third respondent in the vacancy that was earmarked for BC.D group. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the first and second respondents stating that when vacancies arose, the third respondent submitted a caste certificate claiming herself belonging to BC-D group and a Caste Certificate No. C/2822/99, dated 16.6.1999 issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Amberpet to that effect was produced. It is stated that the District Collector was addressed requesting to verify the genuineness of the said Caste Certificate issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer in favour of the third respondent and the same was certified as genuine. It is further stated that the Commissioner, Backward Class Welfare, Andhra Pradesh was also addressed to get the said Caste Certificate produced by the third respondent verified and the same was got verified by the District Collector, Hyderabad, who once again certified that the said Caste Certificate produced by the third respondent is genuine. In view of the clear and specific stand of the respondent-University that the Caste Certificate dated 16.6.1999 produced by the third respondent was found genuine on due verification by the District Collector as well as the Commissioner, Backward Class Welfare, Andhra Pradesh, it is not correct on the part of the petitioner to contend that no action had been taken by the University authorities on her representation submitted to it as to the genuineness of the caste certificate produced by the third respondent to the respondent-University. This Court, in exercise of its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution would not sit in appeal over those factual issues. However, it is open to the petitioner to approach a competent Civil Court, if she is so advised, for redressal of her complaint that the caste certificate produced by the third respondent before the respondent-University is false. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. --------------------------------------------- JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA Dated 18th October, 2011. Msnro