AB 340/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. PK Munir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also Heard Mr. K A Mazumdar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. This is the second bail application Under Section 438 of th e Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the accused person namely Sanjib Kal ita praying for anticipatory bail in connection with Patacharkuchi Police Stati on Case No. 176 of 2010 Under Sections 344/493/420 of the Indian Penal Code ( G DE No.98 of 2010 dated 07.07.2010). Mr. Munir learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that wh en the earlier bail application was rejected on 17.09.2010, statement of the vic tim under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. was not available before this Court. Today I have gone through the FIR as well as the statement Under Se ction 164 of the Cr.P.C.. However, these document are not enough to take a diffe rent view. In other words, I hold that it is not a fit case wherein the privileg e of pre-arrest bail can be granted to the accused person. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.