Civil Revision No. 3470 of 2007 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 3470 of 2007 (O&M) Birachh Bhan ..... Petitioner vs Tarsem Chand ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jitender Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned court below in an application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for supply of the documents which were relied upon by the respondent/defendant in the written statement filed. The application was rejected by the learned court below. The claim in the application was made with regard to the following documents:- “1. Alleged lease deed executed by Malwa Gramin Udyog Samiti, Moonak in favour of the defendant from Oct. 2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2005. 2. Ledger regarding purchasing of crops and ledger account regarding partners of Jindal Rice Mill, Moonak of which defendant was the incharge and all documents i.e. Bahi, Income Tax Return, Sale Tax and agreement executed between the partners of Jindal Rice Mills, Moonak, which are in defendant's possession and other documents concerning rice mill, which are also in defendant's possession. 3. Ledger regarding purchasing of crops and ledger account regarding partners of Dashmesh Rice Mill, Moonak, of which defendant was the incharge and all documents i.e. Bahi, Income Tax Civil Revision No. 3470 of 2007 (2) Return, Sale Tax and agreement executed between the partners of Dashmesh Rice Mills, Moonak, which are in defendant's possession and other documents concerning rice mill, which are in defendant's possession. 4. Ledger relating to selling of crops by Mohar Singh and Santokh Singh with the defendant, as the defendant runs the business of Commission Agent in the name and style of M/s Jindal Trading Commission Agent, Moonak and said Mohar Singh and Santokh Singh used to sell their crops with the defendant.” In reply to the application, the stand of the respondent/defendant was that as far as lease-deed is concerned, the same shall be produced before the court at the time of recording of evidence and the same was not required for filing of replication as claimed by the petitioner/plaintiff. As regards other documents are concerned, it was stated that those documents have not bearing with the present case and as such are not relevant for the purpose of decision of lis between the parties. It is further pleaded by the learned counsel for the respondent that those documents mentioned above from Sr. No. 2 to 4 shall not be relied upon by him in the evidence to be led. Today in the court, learned counsel for the respondent/defendant has handed over a copy of the lease-deed pertaining to the period from 1.10.2002 to 31.8.2003 executed by Malwa Gramin Udyog Samiti in favour of Jindal Rice Mill, Moonak. As regards other documents are concerned, the stand of the respondent/defendant is that those are not relevant for the decision of the present case. In view of the above development, as one of the document has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff today in the court and the stand regarding other documents being not relevant for the purpose of decision of the suit, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. 8.1.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge