1 995.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 995 OF 2011 Shri Bramhanand Ramprasad Sharma. ... Appellant. V/s. Shri Rajnikant J. Pratap and others. ... Respondents. Dhananjay C. Pathak for the appellant. Shreyas V. Pratap for respondent No.5. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 12th September 2011. P.C. : An application tendered by the respondent- original plaintiff seeking order of restraint against the defendant from disturbing their peaceful possession over the suit property was granted by the trial Court in view of the order dated 20th April 2010. It appears that the original defendant No.2 has alienated the whole of the property in favour of the present appellant. The original plaintiff claims to have share in the ancestral property. The defendant No.2 did not have any right to alienate whole of the property in favour of the appellant. Apart from this, the power of attorney holder who has executed the sale-deed has acted in pursuance of unregistered power of attorney which is also claimed as illegal. The trial Court has, thus, considered all the aspects of the matter in appropriate manner and passed a reasoned order. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, no interference with the impugned order is called for. Appeal from order is devoid of any substance and is dismissed as such. (R.M.BORDE, J.)