Civil Revision No.4070 of 2011(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:07.07.2011 Ashok Kumar ....petitioner Versus Manoj Kumar .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Robin Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner *** RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.(ORAL): CM No.16052-CII of 2011 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, delay of 93 days in filing the revision petition is condoned. CM disposed of. Civil Revision No.4070 of 2011(O & M) This is tenant's revision challenging the impugned orders dated 03.03.2010 and 20.12.2010 passed by Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar and Appellate Authority Yamuna Nagar, respectively, whereby eviction application filed by the respondent-landlord was accepted and petitioner was ordered to be evicted for non-payment of rent. The only submission made before this Court on behalf of the petitioner is that he was entitled to an opportunity to pay the arrears of rent before ordering eviction by the Rent Controller and, this, having not been done, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. However, it Civil Revision No.4070 of 2011(O & M) 2 could not be disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that after assessment of provisional rent, he was directed by the Rent Controller to pay the arrears of rent, which, admittedly have not been deposited till date. In view of the aforesaid fact alone, the argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioner cannot be sustained in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Rakesh Wadhawan versus M/s Jagdamba Industrial Corporation 2002 HRR 367(SC). Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 07.07.2011 neenu