1 wp9999.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9999 OF 2009 Hanmantu Hulappa Kurade ...Petitioner vs. Solapur Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. Solapur & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.A.B.Tajane for the petitioner Ms Pallavi Dabholkar for the respondent no.1 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 21, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. My attention has been invited to the order dated 18 th August 2010. The said order reads thus : Learned counsel for the petitioner after taking instructions from his client, who is present in Court, states that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit an amount of Rs. 2.5 lacs within a week. Statement is accepted. The said amount shall be deposited with respondent no.1-bank. Petition will be considered on merits on 25 th August 2010. S.O. to 25 th August 2010. 2 On 14 th September 2010, when it was pointed out that the statement made by the petitioner has not been complied with, the petition was adjourned till today, 2 wp9999.sxw specifically for dismissal. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has received telephonic instructions from the petitioner that he is unable to deposit the said amount. 3 The writ petition cannot be entertained as the petitioner has not complied with the solemn statement made before this Court. Apart from that, by the impugned order, an application made by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 6 years and 4 months in preferring an appeal has been rejected. The Appellate Court is right in holding that there was no justification for such a long delay. Writ Petition is rejected. JUDGE