tlWW':'!.•.•:•<' ;RTTSni 'BgIt Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR «^^- (Arising out of the order dated )ja. U2002 passed in O.A. No.727/2001 (W.P.S. No. 8888/2005) foy State Administrative Tribunal at Raipur Bench) CONTEMPT PETITION N0. / 2006 PETITIONER Smt. Alpana Deshpande W/o Shri Arvind Deshpande, Aged about 39 years, Assistant Professor, (Horae Science), Dr. Khubchand Bhaghel Govt. College, BhUai-3 R/o C-10, South Vasundhara Nagar, Bhilai- 3, District-Durg (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENT Y. S. Bele, S/o Not Known, Deputy Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District-Raipur (CG). ^.,3.15' t^-- CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE KS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 10 OF THE CQDE OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. SJNGLE BENCH : HON'Bl.E MR. SATSSH K. AGN!HQTRI,J, Petitioner Respondents WRITPETltiONfS.l N0.3888 OF 2005 Smt. Aipana Deshpandey ifSrs^a Sfate of C.G. and another CONTEMPTPETITiON'ItO.-'SO OF Petstioner S'r't .Aln?5n?? n^<th"";^'ft'ris ^df'^^i '^T^y^i fl^rf^e' versus- Reseondent Y.S.Bete Prssent : Mr. ManSeSh Shanna, counse! for the petitioner in both the petitiofiS. ,, ;; Mr. V.V.S.Moorthyy'Qeouty Advocate Generai with Mr. Ajay Oviflvedi, Parie! Uwyer for the rsspondents/State in W.P.(S.)N&.3g8S/28i35. ,, Mr. Pahkaj' Shrivastava; counsei for the respondent in Contempt Pt.Na.120/2006. h (F:fSSgaWT2'n,ef OctQber, 2006) • II • . :- . ':""" ''••" •"." ' .".:•.•••'' :.'.• '•••"•. ':'••.,..'' ' ' 1 . .' .' '":; '"" .-•:-.. ' .."^:^.:- •^^::'l.-..:" ;' .'• •' . ' These a;re (W6 pietitiOHs.i.e;, Writ Petition (S.) No.3888 of 2005 and Contempt Petitioft No.120 of 2006. Thecontempt petition ». ' . • • .. •..•••.••'. .'.'•. .. • arises inthe writ psflti'&ft. Thus, ths Writ petition and the contempt pstition are being distioggd of t)x^fili:eommonorder. •...•^,- •••••—•^^'^^F'1' •''-L^''-/:'. " • • l!tl&l. ia^,; 2. The-drigina! applicatiori v/ss flled before the State Administrative Tribunal, BertCh St Raipur, impugning the transfer order dated 24-9-2001 (Afinexure A-1), Whereby the petitioner, who was working on the post ofAsSistaSt Professor at Goyernment Coltege, Bhi]ai-3, District Dui^ waS'tl-ansferred to the Governmsnt Coiiege, Arjunda, District Durg., @v- ^,: ^ 3. Afleraidtffittirifi fte'petitionon 6-10-2001, the Tribunai, by its ordar dated 'iS-'iO-SOOI.^STan'ied statos qiio with regard to the pcsting of the pstitiorier as 6ft :27-9-2001. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits'tHatdespite ffiere bsing thesaid order of status quo, a transfer ordsr dsted $0-6-2008 (Ahnexure C-3 in Contempt Petition No.120 of 2006) was (Sa^sed trSRSfsrring the petitioner to Govemment P.G. Coliege, Koridasa^n, DistnCf Bastar. However, no effect to the said order dated 30-8-200$ <sas ^iven, 4. As amattereffact, th@ petitioner, by way of interim order dated 12-10-2001, remai(i®:ip6stedon the same piace, i.e., 'Government Collsge, ^Bhilai-3, ;13!stricf Durg for about five years. The pstitioner coyid nbl eohtiriueaySnepiaceforever. |5; It is well settled prinfeipleof law that transfer is an incident iOfssn/ice and it is f&r the fernplbyet' t6 ciecide as to where a particuiar ^officer/employ^e be (sost^ci KsSjsiftg in view public interest as we!l as ladministratjvs exigenCy. Thi^ CS&urt tias iimited jurisdiction to interfere ^with the transfer niafi^rs ana this Court can interfer®oniy with the case |of proved roste ficfe, niSh-c6rtlpetence 6f authorlty passing the transfer [order andtransf^oi%iSj-ni<S%iinyffic6nformjtywiththe ruies and regulations. None of the ab6v6Sr6unasarSavailable to frie petitioner. In the facte and cireums^ftces of the case, it is not nscessary to ex^imine validity of the tranSfsr Orders at thisstage. However, the res:pondents - authorities are diTettted not to insist on compiiance of the trarisfer orders datsd 24-9-2001 ahd 30-6-2006. 6. i Accordinsly; tftS wrif petition stands dispossd of and the contempt petition is dIsmisSSd. Notice to the respondent in ths contsmpt petition is diScharfled. Howevsr, the respondents - authorities are at liberty to pfiss appropriate order for posting the petitioner in public interest ahd acfministretwe exigency, in accordance with law. No orderast&cOste.';, 7J, [ A copy of thte order be piaced on the record of the cpntempt petition. ~~ — !. . ;1 .:' 'T:--.'" , Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnihotn Judge