Cr. Appeal No. 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 357, 358, 359 of 2004 Cr. Appeal No. 347, 348, 349, 352,357 & 359 of 2004 13.12.2010 Present: Mr. Nalvesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. Cr. Appeal No. 350 of 2004 Mr. Nalvesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr. Appeal No. 351 and 353 of 2004, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate for respondent. Cr. Appeal No. 358 of 2004, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. None for the respondent. All these criminal appeals relate to the prosecution of the respondents who it is stated have not applied for the license under the Himachal Pradesh Produce Market Act, 1969. The learned trial Court had considered the evidence on record and held that no offence, as alleged, has been made out. The judgment has been challenged on a number of grounds including the fact that the findings of the learned trial Court were not warranted by the material on record. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has placed on record communication addressed by the Secretary, Agriculture Produce Committee, Una stating that since most of the traders had obtained licenses, it would be in the fitness of things to withdraw these appeals. The communication which was sent to the learned counsel has been placed on record of each of the case. These appeals are disposed of as having been withdrawn. December 13, 2010 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge