1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3427 OF 2009 Santosh s/o. Trimbak Chaudhari .. Petitioner Versus Inayatali Fidahussain Bohari and others .. Respondents -- Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 11TH JUNE, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 27th April, 2009, vide which though the application filed by the present petitioner who has filed an objection petition for stay of the delivery of possession has been granted, the said stay has been granted only for a period of one month. The petitioner objects to the outer limit of one month. 2 2. Shri Bhandari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, if for no fault of the petitioner the objection is not decided in a period of one month, the petitioner would unnecessarily suffer. 3. Perusal of the impugned order would reveal that the learned trial court has found that the decree holders are litigating for a period of more than 20 years and that they are senior citizen. In that view of the matter, I do not find any infirmity in the approach adopted by the learned trial court. It is, however, made clear that if the objection could not be decided within the stipulated period for the reason which is not attributable to the petitioner, the petitioner would be at liberty to apply for extension of time and same would be considered by the learned trial court on its own merits. [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/