- 1 - (G.C.P.)J 455 (5,00,000)-11.2001) Spl-H.C.,A.S.,C.D.,78e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5646 OF 2006 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- S/Shri Sachin Thorat i/b V.M.Thorat for the petitioner. Shri V.P.Malvankar, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. -- CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & V.M.KANADE, JJ DATED: 26th September, 2006. P.C. 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner states that the suspension order has already been revoked on 16th September, 2006 and the petition therefore is rendered infructuous. The learned advocate for the petitioner has also stated that during that time the shop had remained closed and the petitioner wants to take appropriate steps in that regard, and therefore, liberty may be granted. - 2 - 2. In view of the fact that the suspension has been revoked, nothing survives in the petition and the same is rendered infructuous, and accordingly the question of giving liberty as such to the petitioner to take appropriate steps does not arise. In case the petitioner is entitled under the provisions of law to take appropriate steps, nothing prevents the petitioner from seeking appropriate remedy in accordance with the provisions of law. For that purpose, there is no question of granting any liberty as such. The petition accordingly stands disposed of as infructuous. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J ) ( V.M.KANADE, J )