IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7725 of 2009 NEELAM KUMARI, WIFE OF KAPILDEO MANDAL, R/V SRI RAMPUR THUTI, P.S. PARBATTA, DISTRICT KHAGARIA-----PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S. SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, MUNGER. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHAGARIA. 5. THE ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHAGARIA. 6. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, KHAGARIA. 7. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, KHAGARIA. 8. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, PARBATTA, KHAGARIA. 9. THE MUKHIYA, TENTHA/KARARI GRAM PANCHAYAT KHAGARIA ----RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 09.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner was appointed as Anganwari Sewika. Her appointment has been cancelled with reference to an enquiry and report furnished behind her back, so submitted learned counsel for the petitioner. It was also submitted that in spite of demand the petitioner was not provided with the copy of the enquiry report. The termination order bearing memo No. 05/Go dated 31.10.2008 is contained in Annexure-6 to this application and has been passed by the Director, I.C.D.S. Against the order of the Director, petitioner has remedy before the Secretary of the Department. 3. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to file representation against the order dated 30.10.2008, Annexure-6 before the Secretary of the Department, who should consider and dispose of the same by passing speaking order as early as possible, in any case within one month of its receipt, of course after hearing the petitioner. - 2 - 4. In the event any appointment is made on the post from which petitioner has been removed, then such appointment shall be subject to the result of the representation filed by the petitioner. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)