IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH MAY 2009 / 8TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 7579 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ACHAMMA THOMAS W/O.THOMAS, AGED YEARS KARUKAYIL CHALUKALPARAMBIL,EDATHWA PO, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, EDATHWA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, (SPECIAL GRADE) EDATHWA PO, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE EDATHWA GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY EDATHWA GRAMA PANCHAYAT OFFICE. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER EDATHWA, P.O.EDATHWA. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ALAPPUZHA, P.O. ALAPPUZHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 7579 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF MAY, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner claims to be in absolute possession and ownership of an item of property covered by Ext.P1 to P3. She says that she has filed a suit as O.S.186 of 2009 before the Munsiff's Court, Alappuzha in relation to certain alleged torts. This writ petition is filed in the wake of Ext.P5 judgment on which an action for contempt was also initiated. I have closed that contempt case today on submission of the petitioner therein that the directions in Ext.P5 have been complied with. Therefore the petitioner who was not a party to the writ petition in which Ext.P5 judgment was issued or to the contempt case cannot have any subsequent grievance on the basis of those proceedings. Hence, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to prosecute the aforesaid suit in accordance with law, this writ petition is dismissed without entering on merits and leaving open all issues. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/30/5