IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 10199 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Pratap Chand. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable his client to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to respondent No. 1. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance to respondent No. 1 within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the respondent No. 1 by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a further period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. In case the representation of the petitioner is 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. considered favourably, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender)