1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.363 OF 2006 M/s. Lake View Developers ...Applicant. v. Vilas R. Pawar ...Respondent. Mr. S.D.Mogre, adv., for the Applicant. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 23rd September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the record. It appears that in contempt petition no.363 of 2006, respondent had appeared through Mr. G.N.Salunke, who has also filed vakalatnama and this was noted in the order dated 8th January, 2008. It appears that thereafter also on some dates, Mr.Salunke, advocate for the respondents was present. However, on 14.2.2008, there appears an order to issue notice to the respondents returnable six weeks though presence of his advocate is also noted. It appears that thereafter respondent was avoiding service as explained in the present application. Therefore, delay is condoned and contempt petition is hereby restored. 2 2 Application stands disposed off. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)