IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5580 of 2008 Decided on: 05.10.2010 Om Parkash …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioners. : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner has only pressed the relief for grant of the subsistence allowance of the period during which he remained under suspension. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner and release due and admissible subsistence allowance to him for the period during which he remained under suspension, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that rest of the reliefs were not pressed for. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 5, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No