1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1618 OF 2007 (Smt. Indu d/o Pyrelal Patle vs. Zilla Parishad, Gondia and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 14, 2008 Heard Shri Dixit, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kapgate, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Shri Mehta, learned Counsel for the respondent no.3. Shri Dixit, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is in respect of selection of respondent no.3 as Anganwadi Sevika on the ground that she does not belong to Bhajiyapartola, which is requirement as per Circular dated 15.9.2006 issued by the Zilla Parishad. Shri Kapgate, learned Counsel for 2 the respondent nos. 1 and 2, has filed an affidavit wherein it is specifically stated that Anganwadi Centre is located at Bhajiyapartola, which is not a separate village and is a part of village Bhajiyapr. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner does not hold merit. Hence, petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj