APPELLANTS: gESPQNDENg: é / $§$€§E§iE @WW EN THE HEGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (Cg) W.P.s No. ?5’§;7@ i, Ashok Kumar Dhruw, S/o Nathan Singh Dhruw, aged about 36 years, R/o Navagaon khurdh, post ~ Mongra pali, Thana ~ Bhaghbahra, Tahsil/Dist ~ Mahasamund, CG. VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, CG. WIRETTETITEQN UNDER ARTTCLE 226/227 GET THE CQNSTETUTEQN or ENMA. W v. q, “Q0“‘ W 2. The Collector, Mahasamund, C.G. 'cy‘v Qy§Jv‘2e£" 3. The Block education officer, Pithora, dist — Mahasamund, CG. Q‘ W‘ v K‘ 4. The District edudation officer, Mahasamund, CG. 57/The Upper sanchalak lok shiksha C.G. Kmpt/w , M‘. M H§GH COURT OF CHHATTISéARH : B!LA$PUR WRET PETFTKDN g8; NO.7512 OF 2009 (Writ Petition under Article 2261227 of the Constitution of india) Sing§e Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- M5 Renu Kochar, counsai for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Pane! Lawyer for the State. V ORDEE (OB&1 (Passed on this 4‘ day of January, 201 0) Learned counsel appearing for the petitione, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Coutt to withdraw thi petion with iiety to take appropriate steps. 2) it is ordered, as pryed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri r ' s ti br a : 1 PETITIONER Ashok Kumar Dhruw Versus RESPONDENTS The Skte of