1 wp1910.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1910 OF 2011 KJ Shri Vilas Vasant Chaudhary )..Petitioner Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors.)..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2222 OF 2011 Prasanna Sahdev Todankar & Ors. )..Petitioners Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai & Ors.)..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2223 OF 2011 Pushpa Sahdev Todankar, since deceased ) through legal heir : Prasanna Sahdev Todankar ) & Ors. )..Petitioners Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai & Ors.)..Respondents ---- Mr.S.A.Sawant for the petitioners. Mr. J.S.Saluja AGP for the State. Mrs.V.S.Gharpure for BMC. ---- 2 wp1910.11.sxw CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ DATE : 15th November, 2011. PC 1 The grievance of the petitioners is in connection with providing alternative premises. According to the petitioners, since long they are making correspondence with the concerned authority of the Corporation but no decision has been taken by the Corporation in that behalf. It is argued that as per the letter dated 18.5.2005, petitioners are entitled to the alternative accommodation as per Census of 1976. In our view, considering the fact of the case, petitioners are directed to make substantive application with the Corporation along with necessary documents within a period of three weeks from today and upon receipt of such application from the petitioners, the Corporation to take final decision in that behalf within four weeks thereafter. While taking the decision, the observations made by the High Court in the Appeal (L) No.140/2009 in Writ Petition No.2616/2008 to be taken into consideration if the facts are identical and decision of 3 wp1910.11.sxw the High Court is applicable to the facts of the present cases. 2 All these petitions are disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J)