REVN. 488-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 488 OF 2010 Rajendra Mahadeo Patil ...Applicant Vs. Mahesh Dhondu Mayekar & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. Shreeram Shirsat, for the Applicant. Mrs. Jayashri Akolkar, for Respondent No.1. Mrs. M. R. Tidake, APP for the Respondent-State. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2010 P.C. 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the disputed amount being paid to the complainant, the dispute is settled. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 has filed affidavit-in-reply dated 27th October, 2010, wherein it is stated that he has received amount of Rs.1,15,000/- by demand draft drawn on Dena Bank, Kudal branch and he has no objection if this Court set aside the REVN. 488-10 - 2 - order of conviction and sentence of the applicant/accused, dated 4-11-2006 passed by the J.M.F.C. Deogad for the offence punishable under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and confirmed by the Sessions Court, Oros, Sindhudurga by judgment & order dated 5-10-2010. Since the parties have settled the dispute and in view of the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.1, the criminal revision application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). The learned advocate Mrs. Jayashri Akolokar undertakes to file Vakalatnama within one week from today. [ V. M. KANADE J.]