1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.214 OF 2011 (Sanjay Madhukarrao Mahakalkar and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 20, 2011 Heard Shri Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Khubalkar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1. Shri Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that the petitioners have challenged validity of the order dated 16/9/2009 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur before the respondent no.2 Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai by filing Appeal No.374/2010 along with application for condonation of delay on 24/5/2010. 2 The learned Counsel prays that the respondent no.2 may be directed to consider the application for condonation of delay and appeal within a stipulated period. In the circumstances, we direct the respondent no.2 to consider the application for condonation for delay as well as appeal filed by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible. With this direction, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj