IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 339 of 2007 Date of Decision: 27.4.2009 Meenaxi ......Petitioner Versus Sarabjit Singh .......Respondent CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the parties. HEMANT GUPTA, J (Oral). The present revision petition is directed against the order passed by the learned District Judge, on 26.10.2006, granting maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. However, a report received from the District Judge, Panchkula, reveals that the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 itself has been decided on 7.8.2007. In view of the said fact, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 27.4.2009 ds