IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11037 of 2008. Decided on: 27.12.2010. ____________________________________________________________ Ashok Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner has been kept in a sealed cover. Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither any departmental proceedings are pending against her client as of today nor any challan has been put in the Criminal Court. If that is so, the respondents are directed to open the sealed cover and to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion, after due verification, from due date, with all consequential benefits. 2. Accordingly, in view of the above observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 27, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?