IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.2673 of 2009 Between: PVSR.Sastry. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.M/s.Sri Kaveri Chit Funds and Finances, Hanamkonda, rep. by its Foreman, Sri K.Srinivas Relddy land 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS O R D E R : Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent-Chit Fund Company. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by defendant No.2 in O.S.No.15 of 2004 aggrieved by order of attachment, dated 20-03-2009, passed by the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, in E.P.No.235 of 2008 therein. The first respondent-Chit Fund Company filed O.S.No.15 of 2004 for recovery of money from the second respondent herein, who is a chit member, and also the petitioner and the third respondent herein, who were the guarantors thereof. The said suit was decreed and in execution thereof, the impugned order was passed directing attachment of petitioner’s salary towards the decretal amount of Rs.1,57,956/- @ Rs.8,000/- per month. In this Civil Revision Petition, the only argument advanced by the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the second respondent herein, who is the principal borrower, is a Government employee and leaving him, the petitioner’s salary has been directed to be attached though he is only a guarantor thereof. Though the petitioner herein is only a guarantor, his liability is co-extensive with that of the principal borrower and as such, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order of attachment passed by the Court below warranting interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY, J) 26th August, 2009 lur