IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18495 of 2009 ANUP KUMAR RAJAK @ ANUP KUMAR,son of Sidheshwar Rajak, resident of village-Bandi, P.S.-Neemchak Bathani,District-Gaya. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 06-07-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner’s innocence is observed by the Supervising Authority in his supervision report and medical report if that would be scrutinized that is nothing more than consented relation if that would be against the petitioner. Statement of the victim is there may be consented but she is a minor. She names this petitioner as one of the members of the gang rape. Supervision report if favours the petitioner, that also shows a circumstance of alibi about his (petitioner’s) remaining in his office, which cannot be read as being inadmissible. Thus, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )