CRM-M-32693 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32693 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision:15.12.2011 Asha Lata ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present: Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl.A.G., Haryana for the State. ***** M.M.S. Bedi, J. (Oral) Petitioner has been summoned as an accused in a private complaint filed by Rakesh alleging that the petitioner had attested the age of Santosh as 60 years to derive benefit of old age pension under the Old Age Pension Scheme. Santosh- co-accused of the petitioner had obtained the benefit of old age pension on the basis of forged document. Though the lodging of the FIR was sought for under Section 156(3) IPC, but considering the complaint, the petitioner has been summoned as an accused after enquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the complainant has intervened to oppose the application for bail. Since the petitioner has already appeared before the trial Court CRM-M-32693 of 2011 2 and has been released on interim bail, it does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation. Interim order dated 1.11.2011 is hereby made absolute. It is ordered that the petitioner shall remain on bail on the bail bonds already submitted, subject to the condition that she will not absent herself without any sufficient cause. December 15, 2011. ( M.M.S. Bedi ) sk Judge