IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2534 of 2011 1. FAROOQUE S/O Md. Nazam. 2. Alimuddin, S/O Md. Nazam. 3. Israil, S/O Md. Nazam. 4. Israfil, S/O Md. Nazam. 5. Hasomuddin, S/O Md. Nazam. 6. Hannan @ Abdul Hannan, S/O Israil. 7. Rahim @ Abdul Rahim, S/O Ishaque. ………….Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.02.2011 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 323, 341, 379, 384, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. There is specific allegation against the petitioners of snatching the money. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that during investigation, it has come that there was wage dispute and the accusation has not been supported by the witnesses, in the manner, it has been recorded in the F.I.R. Considering the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to interfere. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners, considering the materials collected during the investigation and also the 2 fact that the impugned order suggests that the Supervising Officer has not found the case true under Section 384 of the I.P.C. and dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioners same day, if possible, if the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail below within a period of four weeks. With these observations this application is disposed off. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)