T ^*. ''^ ..-•::. ^" aa; sn^l gTtlHi- ~3^ '*<nwt{, waw\<c, hv\wy, ..c^..M.....i^.. sii^i ~^v ('cpig^t?) ^mwgwtsii^! Petitioaer ResBpndents Coafceaiaors Versus 1. 2. 3. 4. Vino^ Knm.gr Gupta, aged about 55 years, sou of Ls(te M.L.Gupta, Head Master, Readent of Radljaswami Colony, Rawanbhafha, Ring Road| No.l, Sunder Nagar, Raipur (Chh^ttisgarh) Ashojk Edudation R.P. fi4andal, CoUector, Raipur (Chliattisgarh) G.R.IChandrakar, District Education OfScer, Pens^on Bada, Raipur (Chliattisgarh) Present- Stari F.S. Khare. couns^l Shri AS Kactihawaha, S.B. Hoa'ble Shri DhiiendTal 17.9.2008 Ttds petition has beei^ conteinpt proceedings agam.^1 respondents have violated Court in W.P.No.2419/04 ^OTfeprh 'wrcff 'cf 'fei^ tFait^K ^aifinanta Shukla, Secretary, Deptt. of School on, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (CG) I. ^ahu., The Block Ediication Officer, Dhajtsiwa, Raipur (CG) Contempt petitioaunder Alrtlcle 21S ofthe Constttntion pfladia read with Sectlpns 10 t^ 12 pfthe Cpnteinpt of Cpurts Act, for fhe petitioner. >y AG for fhe State/respoadents. ipy Mishra, J filed by thc petitioner for uutiatioii of i^t fhe respondents on fhe grouud that fhe order dated 3.9.2004 passed by fhis wjhereby thcy were directed to decide tlie tbe 'TS^ •<ii<ii<n*i, ®Tily'is;fawi'y'j,< *IW<IT a>*«q» Wl 200 311^1 'T^F ('i?!^''^') sii^nw I^'fi'* Wt 311^1 aiii'ti TRIRR ^lfrt 311^1 4»I^Id^1tf'RTR?ff ^ 1^1^ ^l^K ^aiRnan^ii ^ rcpreseiitation submitted by ftl inonfhs. Learaed counsel for th^ representation was decided with grievauce is that a suia of Rs.50 was uot paid to TiiTn, [e petitiouer, wifhia a period of troo pctitioner fairly subinits that his .th|in the aforesaid period. However, lus |,000/- claimed tewanls compensation coi.ulsel Havnjg tieard learued fhe fact fhat the respoadeuts this Court, uo case te made out aeainst fh.e respondents. dropped. for fhe petitioner, haviug regaid to h^ve already coiiipUed wifh the order of |for initiation of contempt proceedings Acco^diagly, the conteinpt proceedings are Jad^®