1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition No.693 of 2010 M/s.Videocon Industries Ltd. .. Petitioners v/s. M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. ..Respondents Mr.Virendra Tuljapurkar Sr. Counsel with R.D.Soni i/b. Ram & Co. for the Petitioners Mr.F. Devetri, Sr. Counsel with Pooniwala i/b. Mulla & Mulla for the Respondents CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 13th April, 2010 P.C. : 1. The Petitioners filed an application before the learned Arbitrator on 13.2.2009 praying for termination of the proceeding for reasons stated in the said application. 2. The learned Arbitrator by order dated 4.8.2009 rejected the said application. 2 3. Being aggrieved by the said Order dated 4.8.2009 the present petition is filed. 4. I have heard learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Senior Counsel for the Respondents. It is sought to be contended that this petition is filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 32(2)(c) r/w. Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. (hereafter referred to as the said Act.). On proper appreciation of the order impugned in this petition, I am not inclined to accept the submission that the present Order can be challenged under Section 34 of the said Act. In view of this, the petition is not maintainable and is required to be rejected. Hence the following order is passed. ORDER Petition is rejected at the stage of admission. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]