IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23706 of 2010 1. SHIVJI MAHTO @ SHEOJEE MAHTO S/O RAMBRIKSH MAHTO 2. RAJESH MAHTO S/O SHIVJEE MAHTO 3. RAKESH MAHTO S/O SHIVJEE MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 24.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 341, 323, 379, 504, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 assaulted the son of the informant causing serious injuries on his head, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Prayer for bail is rejected. So far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned, he assaulted the informant which caused serious injury on the head but he did not repeat the said assault. The petitioner no.1 may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner no.1 bail shall not be considered if his case is bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge and in case it is done the prayer for bail of the petitioner shall not be considered. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )