^-•? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC.G.I WRIT PETITION N0. ^ ^ZOOSO?^ a<ff! PETITIONER L^ fcig ^o's.--' .<** ^^ ^•--""- RESPONDENTS ^ '/s- ''•^ i^»W^I Rewti Raman Singh Son of Late Shri Janki Singh, aged about 42 years, '^A Working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Tarkeshwarpur, Block Premnagar, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through :The ..-- Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 3. The District Education Officer, «'' Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4. The Block Education Officer, ^' Premnagar, District Surguja (C.G.). -^" WRlf;;sa1aE'r[tlON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 sn^T'^1 h-u* sn^i ^Ht^ •fffsci V.- -S^ -^(l^lcl^, £}dltil|!»,i^ClWJ.< tliini shtlich^A^l^et; ^...............................^^ ^^ sn^TOnwaf?^ 6-1-2006 Shri V.K. Pandey, counsel fo Shri Ramakant Mishra, Govt. further submits that he is ser/ing s representation. He further submit^ given an opportunity of filing the ct>l'ili<rf4tl ^!*^fi' ^ f§Tsl<pii^x ^; 3Tf5((lT SD^i the petitioner. Advocate forthe State, on advance copy. Heard. Leamedcounsel-for the petitioner submits that the pet'rtioner has been transferred by order dated 31-8-2C|05 Annexure P-1 from Govt. Primary School Tarkeshwarpur Block Premnagar toj) District Education Office, Ramanujganj. He |ice 2002 in Premnagar which is a scheduled area arid according to the poiicy, l|ie cannot be transferred from one scheduted area to another scheduled area. H^ states that vide annexure P-5, he submitted that for the present the petitioner may be idetailed representation before the competent authority pf tfie respondents, whicih shall be considered on its own merits in aceordance with law. Prayer is not opposed by the before the competent authority of| State counsel. Having considered and witt)out expressing any opinipn ori the merits of thecase, in the opinionof this Couijt, ends of justice will beserved if a direction is given to the petitioner to make a ^letaited representation raising his grievances the respondents along with a copy of the petition and thisorder, within 15 ^lays from today, and onsuch representation being filed, the competent authorit^ its own merits in accordance with months from the date of receipt of tl1e representation. ^ of the respondents shall decide the same on aw as eariy as possible preferably within two [1Eft^^fe^ r XI-HC-22 •S^ ••*!!'i|l<r(<l, ^itWI®.feirey 3i1I^[^^- ru !-LOO(. . h>'.'0 .NT^: fcV /^-t-""^ 023 W -p -N1S sn^i^ii lc;-li?h S^S ^tiW^Tf d^^ +^ '^ ^ y sfi^i TCnwflto —-L—1 Learned counsel or the petiti <til<lf<-l'jil-) W:Rff"? fS^ <r'?]t$l< 4) aifigiTsii^ >ner submits that the petitioner has not been reiieved and he has stgted it inariplication for interim relief. He prays that the petitioner may be allowed to continu^. It is directed that if the petitio^er has not been relieved, he maybe aflowed to continue tilt the representation is has already been relieved, this ord^r will not entitle the petitioner to rejoin at the earlier place of posting. With the aforesaid observatio(is, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently M.W.P.No. 78/p006 also stands disposedof. Certified copy as per rules. decided. It is made clearthat if the petitioner Sd!-.,, Fakh^d*" .ludge [1[f^^t^