IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 33112 of 2010(L) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. M/S.VILAS CONSTRUCTIONS, 1ST FLOOR, CARMEL BUILDINGS, NEW BLOCK, BANERJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682018. 2. T.P.MURALEEDHARAN, 31/224 A, PUSHPANJALI VYTILLA, COCHIN-682019. 3. G.SUKUMARI MURALEEDHARAN, 31/224 A, PUSHPANJALI, VYTILLA, COCHIN-682019. BY ADVS. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.P.GOPINATH MENON SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. LCDR BENNY M.ANTONY, FLEET NAVIGATING OFFICE, C/O.FLEET MAIL OFFICE, MUMBAI-400 001. R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA R2 BY ADVS. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY SMT.K.S.SUMITHA SMT.LIJITTA G.MATHEW SMT.H.ROSHNI SRI.ABDUL JALEEL.A SRI.S.GOPAKUMAR SRI.R.SANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.33112 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010. J U D G M E N T Sri.A.M.Shaffique, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Sri.Shaji P.Chali, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submit that, the petitioners have paid to the second respondent, pursuant to the interim orders passed by this court, the sum of ` 15.50 lakhs and that the second respondent has agreed to accept the said payment towards the full and final settlement of his claim in O.P.No.67 of 2000 on the file of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent also submitted that the parties have also agreed that, the second respondent can withdraw and has already withdrawn the sum of ` 2,90,000/- deposited by the garnishee before the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The learned counsel on both sides submit that, in view of the settlement arrived at by and 2 W.P.(C).No.33112 of 2010 between the parties, this writ petition may be closed with the observation that, the execution petition filed by the second respondent in the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram, to execute the order passed by the Commission in O.P.No.67 of 2000, shall stand dismissed as settled out of court. Ordered accordingly. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ami/