116 ab Ct. 40 26.07.2022. C.P.A.N. 1396 of 2001 Sk. Gisiouddin Vs. Mr. Pritish Kr. Phathak In W.P.A. 9255 of 2001 Anupama Tikmani Vs. C.E.S.C. Limited. Mr. Somnath Bose … For the CESC Ltd. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls. No accommodation is sought for. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Sugato Majumdar, J.)