IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN HON’BLE SRI ANIL R.DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23238 of 2009 Between: Khaja Sirajuddin. … Petitioner And: The A.P. State Wakf Board, reptd., by its CEO, Haj House, Nampally, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N.Chandrasekhar. Counsel for the Respondent: Sri M.A.K.Mukheed for R.1. GP for Endowments for R.3. GP for Social Welfare for R.2 & R.4. This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI ANIL R.DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23238 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.,) This Writ Petition is filed questioning Memo, dated 24-10-2009, issued by respondent No.2, whereby he directed that there shall not be any change in the Committee, which was in the management of Anees-Gul-Ghurba, a notified Wakf. From the material on record, it is evident that the above mentioned Wakf, which was under the management of the Endowments Department was transferred to the Wakf Board under G.O.Ms.No.17, Minorities Welfare (Wakf-II) Department, dated 9- 9-2009. In this connection, respondent No.2 issued the impugned memo directing the Wakf Board to continue the existing management till prior sanction is obtained from the Government for changing the management. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner made several allegations against the Chairman of the Committee, viz., Md.Ameer Ahmed. But, the said person is not impleaded in the Writ Petition. Unless, the person, against whom the allegations are made, is a party to the Writ Petition, it is not possible for us to consider the allegations made by the petitioners against the said person. Moreover, we find that the petitioner has not approached the competent authority for changing the management before filing this Writ Petition. Therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition at this stage. The petitioner is permitted to approach the competent authority for change of management. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ., C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dt.01-2-2010 MNR