IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No. 14459 of 2000 Between: Lokeswari Solvent Oils Pvt.Ltd Rep.by its Managing Director Sri Bangaru Manikyam R/o.Palakol W.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND The Asst Accounts Officer Electricity, Revenue Office, Transmission Corporation of A.P R/o.Palakol W.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not giving 25% rebate on energy charges to the petitioner is highly arbitrary, illegal and unsustainable and consequently direct the Respondent to allow 25% rebate on the energy charges payable by the petitioner as per the Govt.Memo.No.1644/A3/90,Dt.6-10-1998 and as per the Memo.No.247/2000,dt.2-3-2000 issued by the Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd, and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following Order: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 27-08- 2008, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:10-09-2008 Usd