IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE Review Petition No. 107 of 2004 in Writ Petition No. 5321 of 2003 Mohamed Bukhari Maulasaheb Inamdar and ors. ..Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Shri G.M.Savagave for petitioners Shri C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM: A.P.SHAH CORAM: A.P.SHAH CORAM: A.P.SHAH & D.G.KARNIK JJ. & D.G.KARNIK JJ. & D.G.KARNIK JJ. 11th August, 2005. 11th August, 2005. 11th August, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard Counsel appearing for both sides. Perused the record. The learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner has submitted, and in our opinion rightly, that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench dated 2nd April, 1996. The learned A.G.P. Shri Sonawane has also fairly conceded that the facts of the present case are similar and the petitioner is also entitled to exclusion of his land from acquisition. Accordingly we recall our order dated 23rd September, 2003 and make the writ petition absolute in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c). No order as to costs.