1 3 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7313/2009. Smt.Sarla & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 27th July 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Sudheer Sharma, for the petitioners. ... BY THE COURT Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the material placed on record, this Court is unable to find any reason to entertain this writ petition as filed on 21.07.2009 in challenge to the notices issued by Tehsildar (Revenue) Tibbi, District Hanumangarh on 02.09.2008, 09.09.2008, and 30.01.2009 (Annexures 6 to 8) calling upon the addressees to appear and to answer the allegations about trespass over the land comprised in Murabba No.208/239 and 215/242. It has been sought to be contended on behalf of the petitioners that the matter relating to the ceiling proceedings pertaining to their predecessor Sahab Ram had been concluded right up to this Court and the petitioners are in possession of the remaining land; and are not the trespassers. In that regard, nothing prevents the petitioners to make 2 specific reply before the authority concerned to the notices issued and to make out a case if the notices were required to be dropped. There appears no reason to entertain this writ petition against such notices. Though it has been suggested that in relation to the previous notice dated 02.09.2008, the petitioners did submit a reply to the authority concerned but yet another notice had been issued; however, it has not been shown if final decision was taken by the authority concerned on the said notice dated 02.09.2008. Pending such notice in relation to kharif crop, if the authority concerned has issued another notice on 30.01.2009 (Annex.8) in relation to rabi crop, the action in issuing such notice cannot be said to be illegal; and in any case, nothing yet prevented the petitioners from submitting appropriate reply to the notice. This writ petition, filed about 6 months after the date of notice (Annex.8) and even 5 months after the date of appearance as fixed in the said notice, does not merit admission. The petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni