IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9054 of 2010 Date of decision : 16.8.2010 Dr.Sushma Rani … Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others. …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice M.M.Kumar Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. The only question involved in the instant petition is whether the Diploma course acquired by the petitioner in Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery in the year 2000, could be equated with a Degree on the ground that duration of both the courses is of four years. The petitioner, on earlier occasion, was permitted to file a detailed representation. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a representation (Annexure P-14) in which, she has placed reliance on a letter dated 13.3.2009. The representation has been decided vide order dated 21.10.2009 (Annexure P-15) rejecting the claim of the petitioner because vide letter dated 13.3.2009 those Diplomas were equated with the Degree which have been acquired before the enforcement of Homeopathic (Diploma Course) Regulations, 1983. Obviously, the diploma acquired by the petitioner is in the year 2000 which is much later than enforcement of regulation in 1983. There is no merit in this petition. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar ) Judge (Ritu Bahri) Judge 16.08.2010 sd