IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.157 of 2008 MOST.KAMINI DEVI W/O LATE RAJ KISHORE RAI. ---PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SANJAY RAY SON OF MAHESHWAR RAY 3. SHAMBHU RAY S/O PHEKAN ROY 4. VIJAY RAY S/O LATE JIVASH RAY 5. MANJU DEVI W/O VIJAY RAY --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 04 03.09.2010 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the opposite parties and the State are present. This Court under order dated 14.02.2008 directed for consideration of limitation matter at the time of admission. Consequently the same has been taken up. Petitioner is the informant’s wife and she is aggrieved by only that part of the order whereby having being convicted the accuseds( opposite parties herein) they were allowed to be released in terms of Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. The said order was passed on 06.01.2006. Limitation expired on 10.04.2006. Present application was lodged in this Court with defect(s) on 28.09.2007. Learned counsel for the opposite parties placed before me the limitation application i.e. I.A.No. 331 of 2008. This Court is satisfied that the explanation submitted are casual and vague. No sincere effort has been made to explain the delay of more than 539 days in filing the present revision application. This Court, therefore, is not persuaded to allow the aforesaid application (I.A.No. 331 of 2008). Accordingly, the same is rejected. Since I have already rejected the limitation application, the present revision application is also dismissed as barred by limitation. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)