IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28822 of 2008 SONELAL RAY @ RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.9.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the name of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is the husband of the informant who is an accused under sections 498A, 341, 323 and 397 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act which was registered as Jandaha P.S. Case No. 188 of 2007. Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the present case has come to be filed after a complaint was lodged against the family member and wife had abandoned the house. The present case is in retaliation of the complaint case. Taking the above fact into consideration as also that the petitioner has been in custody since 4.5.2008, let the petitioner, namely, Sonelal Ray @ Rai be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 188 of 2007. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)