IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1363 of 2006 MAHENDRA MAHTO & ANR Versus SMT. PAWDHARO DEVI & ORS ----------- 07. 15.04.2009 It appears that due to inadvertence in the order of this Court dated 12.01.2009, the following sentence in 4 to 7th line at page 1, paragraph No. 2, “Despite service of notice on the opposite parties none has appeared to oppose the prayer made in this Civil Revision Application.” has been recorded. As a matter of fact counsel for the opposite parties has pointed out that he had not only made his submissions but also had filed a document, the plaint in question, which is still on record of this case. It is therefore, clear that the aforementioned paragraph in 4 to 7th lines on page-1 of the order dated 12.01.2009 is an error and is accordingly directed to be deleted. The order dated 12.01.2009 shall stand modified to the extent indicated above. Shageer (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)