/^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. 8ATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. WMT PETITION fSVNo. 1671 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Shri Sudheer Tripathi, W/o R.C.Tripathi, Aged about 40 years, R/o Gondpara, Bilaspur (C.G.). VEKSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarb, Through:- Secrelary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Education ofBcer, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Shri Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. (P ORDER assed on 21st ofMarch, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for tiie State/respondents jointly submit that the faot and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, ^-" r, and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Ys, Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired M.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anut