IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 829 OF 2009 ROGHUNATH R.P. SAWKAR AND ANR. ... Petitioner Versus SHRI SHAILENDRA R.P. DESSAI ... Respondent Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Gauri Bhonsule, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 14th December, 2009 P.C. Heard. For the view that we are taking in the matter, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that Tenancy Revision Application No. 66/2004 was taken up by the Tribunal on various occasions, but has not been decided. Learned Counsel for the petitioners points out that the said revision application is fixed on 17th instant for final disposal. We, therefore, direct the learned Administrative Tribunal to hear and decide the same as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within a period of 4 weeks from 17.12.2009. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. The learned Counsel for the petitioner assures the Court to convey this Order to the Administrative Tribunal. Authenticated copy of this order be issued to the parties. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.