IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.22204-M of 2010 Date of Decision:4.1.2011 Kashmit Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jaspreet Singh, A.A.G. Punjab. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition. However, it is stated that the parties will be satisfied if the direction is issued to the investigating agency to take into consideration the evidence produced by them before filing the challan. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, the investigating agency shall allow the parties to participate in the inquiry/investigation and also take into consideration the evidence, if any, produced by them. 4.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE