^s/^..^s.s^^^'^s'^s^: ^s'-^v^'sese^'^^'^K ^:::^^s'ff^ <- ¥'V ^^?.^^'SV^S^SSfSS'^^^f&^^S^ •"•^y:y'fs^i:: ;:..'^?; \;':'; .• • JJl^'ai:'^^,,,:.:.,' fl-^:;"ifs@rf^-y n,.;.irf-^—"•••"'^ ^OJI^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0. /4"^ OF 2006 PETTTIONER : / Yogendra Pal, S/o late Shri Chetan Ram Pal, Aged about 26 years, R/o Dabripara Pratap Chowk Bilaspur VERSUS RESPONDENT ^J^ co^ \°16S 0^^ 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the secretary Deparetment of Water resources D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /I. Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Chui Khadan/ District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) /3. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: the Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) ^yft PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS OR APPROPRIATATE ORDER/DIRECTION ETC. XI-HC-22 •3^'^IFfRTq, ®Tfl'y'l!o,Wfll'My w^?n sBWii t^p-No. i^y' SII^T^iT K-ii'* 31)^1 *Hisji '^fi'tf pl. ^ ^^ .< an^i ^aiw ^itet 13-1-2006 Petitioner bv-Shri Bhaskar P^ <t;l'4fa4lrl ^•4^1?'^ 'fe^ <^)^i< ^sipOTsn^i yasi, Advocate. Shri Vivek Sharma, for the S1|ate/respondents. With consent, heard finally. This case relates to coinpass^onate appoiatomLent consequent upon the deafh ofaa employee servuig ia fhe Leamed Gounsel for the petitioner categoricaUy stated fhat, the death of the employee has occurred on earUer. It is farther submitted No. 1322/2002 mvolviag the same 17-10-1999 i.e. afier 1-11-1997 aud not [fhat ia bateh of cases bearing W.P, ^uestion orders have been passed by fhis piatsimilar OEders inay be passed in fhis Court on 20/12/2005; Heprays case also. . Leamed couasel for the St^te does not dispute the above fact and states that the State of.ChIiattiss cases of dependaats of those ein]j strictly in accordance with the poU<| Irh has taken a decision to consider the Sloyees who died on or after l/1l/1997 |y prevalent at that tiine. . In view of the subniissions i<iade by leamed counsel appeariag tbr the parties, wifhout-expressing aay o opinion pf fhis Court, ends ofjust^ tbe State of Chhattisgarh aud th inay avail the reinedy available uni ConseqnenUy M.W.P. No. 43^ Certified copy as per rules. Copy to fhe State counsel, State. pinion on the inerits of the case, in the ce' wiU be served if a direction is given to authorities concemed to coasider aad decide the case of the petitioner uji accordance with the poUcy prevalent at fhe time ofdeath offhe employee c|oncemed. Ifthe petitioner found el^ible, 4s early as possibleon or before 30th April, 2006. The petitioner is also dir^cted to render due co-operatioa to fhe aufhorities. It is inade clear that ifl any grievaace stUl reniains, the petitioner ler the law includiag fiting of the .petition before fhis Court. With fhe aforesaid observati4Eis, fhis petitionstands disposed of. t/2006 also stands disposed of. wtio wiU be obl^ed to coianiurucate the order to fhe respoiidents for coinpl(aace. Sd'- Fakhruddin Judge ['qf^r ^fe^