.^^*^"^, '''^, .^ ~M. ^ % 1 I 1 ^. IJ HIGH COURT Op CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 872 of 2006 Petitiouer Awadhesh Kuiu.ar Gupta, aged 49 yeai's, S/o Late Shri R. S. Gupta, R/o village BatauU, Sitapur, Distnct Surguja (C.G.j Versus Respoudents 1. State of Chliattisgarh, fhrough. Seci^taiy, Tribal Welfai-e Deptt., Raipur, Distt. Raipur 'r^ ^.^JT.). Coiniuissioner, Tribal Welfare Departaient, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Chie.f Executi.ve Officer, Distt. Panchayat Surguja, Ainbikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Batauli, Block Batauli, TalisU Sitapur, Distt. Sui^uja (C.G.) Asst. ComTnissioner, Tribal Welfare Departnint, District Surguja (C.G.) Parasnath Siagh, Head Master, School Sai'maiia, Block Bataiili, Tahsil Sitapur, Dis.tnct Siix^uja (C.G,) 2. 3. 4. 5, 6. WRIT PETTTIQN_UND_ER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTIOPi OF IND!A (SB: Hontile Shri Satisli K. Agaihotri J.) Shri Vikiam Dixit, Advocate for tiie petitioner. Ms Sunita Jain, Panel La^vyer for fhe respondents No. 1, 2, 4 & 5. 1. 9.. 3. Thakur (Passed on this 24th day ofjiuie, 2009) Hear-d. Leai-aed coiinsel appearing for fhe petitioner subnuts ffaat ia view of fhe averments made by tiie respondents/State ia para 3 oftlie retiu-n dated 21.5.2009, aotliiag survives iu tliis writ petition for adjudication. Thus, fhis writ petition has becoine inlructliozis. Leained counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no Accordirigly, fkis writ petition is disiaissed as having becom.e ructuous. Intermi order dated 2.3.2006 is vacated. No order asto costs. I"— —— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i