CR No.6583 of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.6583 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 12.11.2009 **** Mahipal and others . . . . Petitioners VS. Yashpal Kaur and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioners ***** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). This revision petition is directed by the landlords against the order dated 01.09.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Rohtak, dismissing their application for appointment of some building expert as a Local Commissioner to inspect the demised premises, which according to them is in dilapidated condition and has become unfit and unsafe for human habitation. (2). The Rent Controller, Rohtak has dismissed the application after observing that the petitioner-landlords shall be at liberty to examine an expert/architect on their behalf when their turn to lead evidence comes. The grievance of the petitioner-landlords, on the other hand, is that the respondent-tenants shall not permit their expert/architect to inspect or visit the building due to which they will not be in a position to bring the correct facts on record. CR No.6583 of 2009 - 2 - (3). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners at some length, I am of the considered opinion that no interference with the impugned order, at this stage, is called for. Suffice it to say that if the petitioners would decide to produce some building expert/architect as their witness, they shall be entitled to seek an appropriate direction from the Rent Controller, Rohtak, to permit such expert to inspect the building and submit his report. (4). Disposed of. (5). Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 12.11.2009 vishal shonkar