IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1409 of 2009 MOST.SHANTI DEVI & ORS Versus RAM NARAYAN SAH & ORS ----------- 3. 16.09.2009. Heard Sri Pushkar Narain Sahi, learned counsel for defendant-petitioner. The petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 2.5.2009 effect whereof is only to amend the schedule of the plaint. This court would not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order inasmuch as it is always open for the plaintiff to explain the property in question which is the subject matter of the suit. In any event there would be no change in the nature of the suit keeping in view that the defendant petitioners have altogether denied the claim of the petitioner plaintiff- opposite parties of having any interest and/or share in the Cinema business and thus the shops running in the same Cinema Hall complex being made part of the Schedule of the amended plaint can also cause no prejudice to the defendant petitioner. Accordingly this Court must hold that amendment allowed by the impugned order is 2 perfectly in order well within the scope of order VI Rules 17 C.P.C. if however the defendant petitioners would like to explain their stand any further in this regard limited to amendment allowed by the impugned order, they may file an additional written statement confined to that extent only within a period of four weeks from today. That being so, this application with the aforementioned observations, must be and is, accordingly, dismissed. . kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)