1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.11.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.92 and 93 of 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai III. ... Appellant in both the Appeals -vs- M/s.Sundaram Home Finance Ltd., 46, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. ... Respondent in both the Appeals Tax Case (Appeals) filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the common order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'C' Chennai, dated 14.08.2008 in I.T.A.Nos.27 and 28/Mds/2008 for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively. For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan, For M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar, Padmanabhan, Ramamani ****** http://www.judis.nic.in 2 COMMON JUDGMENT (Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J.) These appeals, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are directed against the common order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'C' Chennai, (for brevity “the Tribunal”) dated 14.08.2008, in I.T.A.Nos.27 and 28/Mds/2008 for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 respectively. 2. The appeals have been admitted, on 19.03.2009, on the following substantial question of law:- “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the interest earned by the assessee company from the Statutory Liquidity Reserve Investments is eligible for deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act.” 3. Heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant; and Mr.R.Venkata Narayana, learned counsel for the respondent. http://www.judis.nic.in 3 4. We have perused the order passed by the Tribunal and from paragraph 2 of the order, we find that the tax effect in the case is well below the threshold limit prescribed under the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018. Hence, the appeals are dismissed on the ground of low tax effect and the substantial question of law, framed for consideration, is left open. No costs. The Revenue is at liberty to seek for restoration of appeal if at a later point of time, it is found that the tax effect is above the threshold limit or to fall under the exceptional clauses mentioned in the Circular. (T.S.S., J.) (N.S.K., J.) 19.11.2018 abr To The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'C' Chennai. http://www.judis.nic.in 4 T.S.Sivagnanam, J. and N.Sathish Kumar, J. (abr) T.C. (A) Nos.92 and 93 of 2009 19.11.2018 http://www.judis.nic.in