IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 Mat.Appeal.No. 653 of 2009() ---------------------------------------- OP.548/2008 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------- 1. JACOB ANTHRAPER, UP XI/990, MALIYEKKAL, DEVASWOM LANE, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. 2. CHINNAMMA ANTHRAPER, W/O.JACOB ANTHRAPER, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 3. JOHN ANTHRAPER, S/O.JACOB ANTHRAPER, DO. DO. NOW WORKING AT UAE, P.B. NO.2326 PLAIN UAE. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER --------------------------------------------- SUNITHA ELIZABETH JACOB @ SUNITHA JOHN ANTHRAPER, D/O.C.T.JACOB, RESIDING AT OOPPOOTTIL, PALAPURACKAL, THAZHATHANGADY. BY ADVS. SRI.K.L.NARASIMHAN, SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss MA. NO.653/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES A1:- COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE IST APPELLANT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM. A2:- COPY OF THE PETITION FOR SUMMONING THE BANK MANAGER FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM. A3:- COPY OF THE PETITION FILED TO REVIEW THE ORDER OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM. A4:- COPY OF THE ORDER SHEET RELATING TO THE POSTING OF THE CASE BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM. A5:- COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 20.3.2009 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM. A6:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 25.3.2009 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL:- P.S. TO JUDGE tss Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & K.Surendra Mohan, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Mat.Appeal No.653 of 2009 & I.A.No.2141 of 2011 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011. Judgment Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The affidavit of the first appellant accompanying I.A.No.2141 of 2011 with the copy of agreement is recorded. The appeal is accordingly ordered in terms of the affidavit and agreement. The parties will give effect to that agreement. The respondent will be at liberty to withdraw the amounts lying in deposit before the court below and upon that, the attachment of the property of the appellants will stand vacated. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. K.Surendra Mohan, Judge. Sha/1808