MGN IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1987 of 2007 PETITION NO.1987 of 2007 PETITION NO.1987 of 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.659 OF 2007 Jai Karan Nagwan .Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Petitioner present in person. Ms. Leena Shah with Ms. Rituja Ambekar for respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO & REBELLO & REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, R.M.SAVANT, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2007 : 16TH APRIL, 2007 : 16TH APRIL, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . On behalf of the respondents they place on record a copy of the communication received. That communication would indicate that the petitioner’s case would be reconsidered on the petitioner resubmitting the case duly authenticated in fresh proforma after obtaining time bound sanction as per Rule 188. Petitioner in person draws our attention to the fresh communication being Exhibit "N" wherein it is resolved to refix the petitioner’s salary. Considering the above the Respondents are directed to refix the petitioner’s salary within one month from today by giving benefits with retrospective effect to which he is entitled to. In the facts and circumstances though the petitioner made a request for interest we are not inclined to grant the same subject to the condition that the petitioner’s case is disposed of within one month. If his case is not disposed of within one month from today the amount would carry 8% p.a. simple interest from the date he is entitled till payment. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. . Since the petition itself is disposed of a Civil Application stands dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO, J) (R.M. R.M. R.M. SAVANT,J) SAVANT,J) SAVANT,J)