"\ 1..A \1? £• -s-^o^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION N0. "3^ ^O OF 2004 PETITIONER ^.^^H ::h: $:.^'^>- years, ^9.--"".C^'v"^^^\ -••^ n°r ^o.--' v^^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Esther Kalihari W/o Shri Akshay Kalihari, Aged about 58 Project Officer, I.C.D.S. Doundilohara, District Durg, (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Woman and Child Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). Smt. Saroj Nand, Project Officer, I.C.D.S, Bemetara, Durg, District Durg, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OFAN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI BTC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ^^ XI-HC-22 cs< ~5^ T^ii<4i<n<i ?Ri.'^ftwTs,'f^iray 3Tr^?r 'q^ra? u:.:£dl1?:....33.qo/6tf WR^'^^'*'**'***^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 200 '^R^' ^n^T'^T f<rii<=b 3?nt?T $ft^icn 'MRa ^ r'! + ^ET y •^ 3TT^T'^ff^R ^Tf^T 29-9-2004 SM Raje.sh Pandey, counsel for tl|i Shri Aidiil Agrawal^ Panel Lawy^i 3 Appiication fbr urgent hearmg is H.eard. ' . Leamed counsel for the pdition^i transfer of the petitioner. He ftirther su| years and at tlie fag^ eiid of his service, Iflirthe-r submitted that she has be-eri tr4 whereas the respondent no, 2 has been |is- farther submitted that there' are -^. ^etitioner may be accoiiiiiiodated tlier^ presfent tlie petitioner may be'given 'ai^ representation befbre the competeiit [shali be considered on its' owri merits m 4 IIa^ing considered and without ofthecase,' m the opmion ofthis C'ourt. direction 1s given to the petitioner to m^ her grievances before tlie coinpetent autl a copy of the petition aiid this orde| |representation being filed, -the competen] Idecide flie same on its^own merits iiil possible preferably within six weeks represeotatioiL . Counsel for the' petitioner submi Irelieved and she be allowed to contmue tJ Ifthe petitioner has not been reli^ is.made clear tliat ifflie petitioner has lioine-d, this order will not entitle her to re| Witli the aforesa.id observations, fl| Conseque.ntly, M.-W.P.No. 2934/'; C.C.as per rules. <=bN(d^i1T1 TTTR^Tf"? 'fe^t ^^K ir ^rf^TH 3n^r [le.petmoner. Irforthe State.' . . Ulowed. submits that tlie matter. relates to ^mits that'the petitioner is-aged 58 Ishe should not be trasisfeiTed/ It is (nsfen'ed on admmistration groimd transfen'ed on her own expenses: It vacant posts in tlier vicmity, the He mrtlier. submits -that for the opportumty of filmg the detailed. [thorify of the respondeiits, whicli ;cordanc.e with law. lq}ressing:any opinion onthe merits ends ofiu'sticewilibe served if a ke a detailed representation raising lority ofthe respondents.along with ^'within 10- days, and on such authority ofthe respondents shall accordance witli-law. as .early.as trom the date of receipt of the fe^that 'file petitioner.'has not been Jll the .represeiitation is :decided. ^ved, she.be allowed to continue. It |)een relieved and otiier p.erson has om'm the earlier place ofposting, l|is petition stands dispose.d of |004 also' stands disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [''ft^ ^Rsi^