IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 78 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- PUSHPARAJAN , AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN, MANNADIYIL HOUSE, BYSONVALLY PO, 40 ACRE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK ,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.SHYJU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MUNNAR POLICE STATION, MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 612. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ADIMALY POLICE STATION, ADIMALY, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 561. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJAKAD POLICE STATION, RAJAKAD, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 566. 4. VIJAYAKUMAR @ VIJI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, MANNOOPURAYIDATHIL HOUSE POTTENKAKDU PO, POTTENKAD, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 569. 5. SIVAN,AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS MANNOOPURAYIDATHIL HOUSE,POTTENKAKDU PO, POTTENKAD IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 569. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.KAMMAPPU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPCR NO.78 OF 2011-S PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.59/2011. K.M. JOSEPH & M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(CRL).NO. 78 OF 2011 S ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th February, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner is the father of Ms. Priyanka. He alleges illegal detention by respondents 4 and 5. Today, the alleged detenu and the fourth respondent were present. So also the petitioner. We interacted with all of them. 2. The alleged detenu would state that she is not under any illegal detention. She would say that she was in love with the fourth respondent and their love affair culminated in marriage in Bangalore on 14.2.2011 and it is also registered under the Rules made under the Hindu Marriage Act of Karnataka and the Marriage Certificate is also produced before us. We allowed the petitioner to interact with the alleged detenu also. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader also. W.P.(CRL).NO.78 OF 2011 S 2 3. We are of the view that there is no illegal detention. Petitioner would state that the marriage between his daughter and the fourth respondent may be solemnized/registered. The fourth respondent and the alleged detenu would state that they are prepared to have their marriage registered under the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules, 2008. In such circumstances, we close this Writ Petition. Post the case on 25.3.2011 for production of the Registration Certificate of the marriage as per the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules, 2008. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. //True Copy// W.P.(CRL).NO.78 OF 2011 S 3