IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3584 of 2010 MD. ISMAIL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Add. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is accused in a case instituted for the offence under sections 365/ 366/ 366A/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that according to the F.I.R. Mamta Kumari, daughter of the informant, was kidnapped by this petitioner with the help of other accused persons for the purpose of marriage. The victim girl, Mamta Kumari, voluntarily appeared and subsequently her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C., vide Annexure-2, was recorded on 9th October, 2009 where she has clearly stated that she had love affairs with the petitioner and she has voluntarily married with him at Delhi. She has also stated that her father has filed the present false case on the instigation of some other persons. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 23.11.2009. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of - 2 - C.J.M., Jehanabad in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 441 of 2009. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/