1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.532 OF 2009 M/s. Mittal Developers ..Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. K.S. Dewal for the Petitioners. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP, for the respondents. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 12TH OCTOBER 2009. P.C. : 1. From the Writ Petition it is clear that the alternate remedy resorted to by the petitioners against the notice dated 30th January, 2008 by way of Appeal before the S.D.O. is still pending. It is open for the petitioners to pursue that remedy. If the petitioners are successful in the Appeal pending before the S.D.O., it would be open for the petitioners to bring that order to the notice of the Tahsildar with a request to withdraw the second notice dated 4th February, 2008. 2. In the event any order adverse to the petitioners is passed, it will be open for the petitioners to challenge the same in accordance with law. 3. All contentions on merits are kept open. (A.A. Sayed, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)