IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 20652 of 2011 Date of decision : 07.11.2011 Dr. Jaspal Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab and others ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Parveen K. Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Only grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that his probation period has not been cleared after expiry of same and he has not been granted the benefit of annual increment from year 2009 onwards. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in the relief claimed in the petition, the petitioner has also served a legal notice, Annexure P-10 to the concerned authority. However, no decision has been taken thereon. Notice of motion. On the asking of court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, DAG Punjab accepts notice. He submits that he has no objection if a direction is issued to the concerned authority to take a decision on the legal notice submitted by the petitioner. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority to take a decision on the legal notice, Annexure P- 10 preferred by the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of three months. November 07, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE