IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9329 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision:01.04.2011 Municipal Corporation, Amritsar ....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Reeta Kohli, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) There is no representation for the petitioner. The writ petition contains a challenge to the order of the Labour Court directing regularization of services of the third respondent-workman in the Municipal Committee There have been no interim orders in the writ petition. The writ petition was said to have been connected with several other writ petitions of the same type. The order itself must have worked out. I dismiss the appeal since there is no representation of the petitioner to explain the present status. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 01.04.2011 sanjeev