^, f t tii.B'ie^Ai-..— •-= y-, ;-- ?. a ^ j- -y. 5 ui.Kitt! c^ (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.Tf^ /2006 PETIT10NER ^, ^/ ^/ .-)- -•J-". <<^'^,\; ^^ /' ^y RESPONDENTS (J-' ^ Pramod Kumar Parakh S/o Shri Kanvar Lal Parakh Age about 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, At present- Govt. Primary School, Shikaritola, Block - Ambagarh Chowki, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION QF 1NDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI6H COUKT OF CHHATTtS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR SATISH K.A6NIHOTRI. J. (T- Petitioner WRTT PETmON ffi.t N0.712S OF 2006 (Cu. SavHa Soni versus Resbondents State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh and cBWther tetitjoner WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0 7126 OF 2006 Smt. Janak Nandini Sharma verajs Resbondents The StateSovemmentofChhattisgarh and ano'ttier Petitioner wprr pETmoN rsyN0.7127 OF 2006 Pramod Kumar Parakh versus Resoondents Petitioner State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh ond (Biother And WRTT PETmON fS.t N0 7143 OF 2006 Ku. Rjta Pandey (Npw-Smt. Rita Mishra versus Respondents State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ajay Shriva5tava,counsel for the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for the 5tate/ respondents. OIIDER (Passedon •th(s21*tdByof Oecember, 2006) 1. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioners as also for the S+nte/re^pondents join+ly submit that the facts and ques-h'on of Ipiw involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by ' • . .. • . • - • . " . • • ' the elecision of thte Court- in the case of Yasfwwit Kumw i . .. . • • •.• ' . -; • :. '. • . '.:.' •' .. ' '• ' ' ' Wwf'adwejvs. MtMie^al Cwpwa^M, Qwy wid awthe^. 2. por the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are di^osed of in terms of the decision of this Court' in the matter of Ya^iwant Kumar Bharadwaj{CMpvt^. aibject to verification of the act as to whetiier the petitioners have acquired B, Ed. Certificates at their pwn expenses ns per the circulars dated i ' . . ^ ! 1 ^: ^^ - . .: . . - .- . . - - .- - 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 andfurther whether they have been paid two adyance increments ornot.No order asto costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatisbK.Agniho"1 Judge 1 2006CE[}MPJR-C696 Bablu