IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2597 of 1987 Date of Decision: 5.3.2010 Savitri ...Appellant Versus Dalel Chand .....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh Present: Mr. G.S. Jaswal, Advocate for appellant. None for respondent. ..... Alok Singh, J. This is the second appeal filed by plaintiff-appellant challenging the order of First Appellate Court/District Judge, Roper dated 18.3.1987. Both the courts below dismissed the suit of the plaintiff for recovery of Rs.1000/- being claimed as compensation for malicious prosecution. First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that suit is triable by Court of small causes and is not triable by Civil Court. No substantial question of law is stated in the memo of appeal as required under Section 100 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, I am of the view that both courts below committed no error while dismissing suit. Moreover, the amount involved is only Rs.1000/-, hence, I am not inclined to entertain the appeal. Appeal is dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 5.3.2010 sharmila