Single Eemh' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) ’” ' WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 43/5/70 ‘ ’ OF 2006 CV:’/1s%s2/ PETITIONER Bindeshwar Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 45 years, Son of Shri Shyam Prasad Jaiswal, Occupation-Service, Posted as Upper DixL§Lgrl:,..1;each.er7~w Middle Wsonpur, Block Bhaiyathan, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throughw The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal v Development, Raipur (C.G.). The ’Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). n The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE W CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. / / XI—HC—78 HW,WW,W WW . .w.€..‘.«.$;.t.°l;o.e.... RE 200 mm (W) mam WWW mmffwm %31%qan%$ 29.82006mwm . \ Mr. Bipin Tiwari, Advocate fort e petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel er for the State on advance copy. Heard. By this petition the petitione has questioned the order dated 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) whereby he has be n transferred from. Middle School, Shyam Nagar, Pratappur to at the option of Block Development Education Officer, Premnagar. The case of the petitioner is th tthe petitioner has been transferred showing him as Upper Division Teacher w rking in the Middle School, Shyamnagar, Pratapur, whereas, he is working as pper Division Teacher in the Middle School Sonpur, Block Bhaiyathan, District Sa guja. Moreover‘ the wife of the petitioner is suffering from hear ailment. tin the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to make a d tailed representation to respondent No.3 and in turn. respondent No3 be directedt decide the representation of the petitioner, to which learned Panel Lawyer for the St te has no objection. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, witho texpressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed to m ke a detailed representation raising all his grievances to respondent No.3 with 10 days from today along with copy of this petition & annexures and in turn, re ondent No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 d from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law after considering ll the points raised by the petitioner. ln the meantime, till the de ision of the representation, the effect and operation of impugned order dated 77.2006 (Annexure P—1) in respect of the petitioner herein shall remained stay With the direction aforesaid, th petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.3J1q0/06 also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Judge Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo L i a e .