"'*-• I') IN THE?HI6H CQ!tERT<»E^ITlM<^' REATBtI-ASftTR WRIT P3E't>ITI<3N;NO. "'''"I OF 2QOS PESTNTIONERS ^ ,^/. '^''^^ i-iift ::^ ••'_<'y. '.<psr/% ^7 1. Jaipal 'Hi.ndiri'a.i son of Slarj1 X.Jdhomal Hinduja, aged ateiit 35 , years, Corporator, Sant Kanwar Ra.iti /Ward; Municipal Cottncil, Tilda-Nevra, Distncf.Raipur. 2. Syrertdra Das Vaishnav, sori. ef•^Shri Mol-tan Das Va.islanav, aged a'bflut 29 years, Corporatori, Bal Oarcgadhar Tilak Ward, MliuiGipaI Co'unci.l, Tilda- Nevra I3;istrict Raipyr Vs ^BSPONDENTS C^S^-'^'y 'V^^sfS^''- :.S ^a>;l-;gx';-'../i?i '"^'wasissy • ;'/ 1. 3 State pf CtthattisgarK., tfarougfa ;; the Secretary, Mlrmistry • of Revenue,! ]3.K;.S. El'Kawan, Raipur. Tb,e; GolIectQr, Ra.ipur. ;: •'I'lJKe .i.^ S/uLib,:' •EivistOin.g.l ;QiffiGeri(EG|venue;), Ra.i.iaiff; TilMa •S^ra.,^Ej^sjtrIct ®.;:l::n^:e.;.^;Mum.|jcipal.; qGouncil^, 1'il:da;.lN®^E!a yirtg®!"IS3Eeii3;Ei't:ive'^:;Qffteeii-., iailB.lti-IWNiiJa,, MiBfcs iS'SaiS'iiiililSSi^ ^^^^•^s^v^t^'- through tla.e M •Ml ;iiMga ItS ^iit Bffil ,111 ^-Sifli l:;^t^l •'::h^;[^ ^^^^^§ iia :M ;a Distit'tet' :®ro|ia[jg:|| ^vss& i XI-HC-22 3n<Sr?ir R:rN?3:n^T sriiqiflfer ^iW^ 3^ •<ii<iici<<, aTOti'is, ficlltili< 3ii^i «ach ^.s:.^:.k..^ll H11MI SBIiq) V^ 1 200^~ fe^s 31I^?T BTtIRK tlfer MVISION BBMCH HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTUVA & HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRAMltSHRA, JJ 05.01.2007 Shri BP Sharma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Utkarsh Verma, Dy ^A for the State. Shri Prateek Sharma, coi^nsel for respondent N0,6. Some piece of l<md out c(f Khasra No.253/1 at Tilda Nevra was kept reserved for construction of Tefisil Office; but respondent No.6 attempted to encroach 35,000 s<) ft out o' for allotment of the same free In view of the return f affidavit and document, it is ev|i dropped and encroachment ha^ disbelieve the said averment.l construction of Tehsil Office it and we do not find anyjustificcrt^ Petition is disposed of. petitioners should be reti.lrned 1)s them. CDNl(n<flTi ^w<nT^TT*s^;t<i'ai«i< ^si^rsn^T the said land. He also filed an application of cost. Therefore, this petition has been filed for restraining State Autl^rity from allpttin9 the said piece of land to any person or any community trjd further to direct the State Authority to allot funds for construction of TTehsil Office. iled by the State duty supported with an ident that allotment proceedings have been been removed. There is no material to So for direction to provide fund for concerned, it is the domain of the State, on to interfere. ^lowever, security amount deposited by the Sd/- V.K-Shrivastava Judge Sd/- Dbirendra Mishra Judge (•^^pr) ly y, s, ie>- 3. 18 id ;h