IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 20894 of 1999 Between: M.Radha Krishna, S/o. M.Sankaraiah, R/o.Pangal Village and Post, Nalgonda Mandal and District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Manager Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Depot Manager, Nalgonda Depot, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in not providing alternative employment, Booking clerk/any suitable post as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law, contrary to provisions of persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of right and full participation) Act, 1955 and also in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consquently direct the respondents to provide alternative employment, Booking Clerk/any suitable post in the Respondent Corporation. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.P.SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents : SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No : 24062 of 2007 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of Mandamus, to declare the action of respondents in not providing alternate employment of Booking Clerk or any other suitable post, as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1955. 2. In the writ petition, it is the case of the petitioner that he has suﬀered disability during the employment. But however, when the matter is taken up, it is represented by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents that the petitioner had already died during the pendency of the writ petition, and all the monetary beneﬁts payable on account of his service, were also settled and paid to his legal representatives. 3. As the petitioner is died, and no steps have been taken to bring on record his legal representatives, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 8th September 2008 ajr To 1 The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nalgonda Depot, Nalgonda District.