1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.01.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.14 of 2011 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1 of 2011 1.Malarvizhi 2.Minor Sushma 3.Minor Reshma (Minor petitioners 2 and 3 are represented through their mother and guardian viz., the first petitioner) .. Petitioners Vs. Kodi .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and executable order dated 30.09.2010 passed in Interlocutory Application No.3 of 2009 in H.M.O.P.No.374 of 2005 by the Family Court, Madurai. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Chandra Mohan For Respondent : Mr.R.Ganesan ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed so as to enhance the amount passed in the order in Interlocutory Application No.3 of 2009 in H.M.O.P.No.374 of 2005 by the Family Court, Madurai. 2. The respondent herein as petitioner has filed H.M.O.P.No.374 of 2005 on the file of the Court below for getting divorce, wherein the first revision petitioner has been shown as respondent. During pendency of the same, the revision petitioners as petitioners have filed Interlocutory Application No.374 of 2005 so as to get interim monthly maintenance. The Court below has directed the respondent to pay Rs.2,000/- per month to the second revision petitioner and Rs.1,500/- per month to the third revision petitioner. For the purpose of getting enhancement, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners has contended that the Court below has granted only a meagre sum of Rs.2,000/- and Rs.1,500/- per month to the revision petitioners 2 and 3 and the second revision petitioner is suffering from illness and under the said circumstances, the quantum of amount fixed by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Court below is liable to be enhanced. 4. Considering the fact that the respondent is the father of the revision petitioners 2 and 3 and also considering the fact that the respondent has already been directed to pay Rs.1,000/- to the first revision petitioner, this Court is of the view to direct him to pay Rs.2,000/- per month to the third revision petitioner. With the above modification, this Civil Revision Petition is liable to be disposed of. 5. In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed without costs and the respondent is directed to pay Rs.2,000/- per month to the third revision petitioner viz., Minor Reshma. In other aspects, the order passed by the Court below is confirmed. However the Family Court, Madurai is directed to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.374 of 2005 before the end of March, 2011 and report the same to the Registry without fail. The respondent is directed to pay the entire arrears of amount. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(W) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Judge,Family Court, Madurai. Copy to: The Section Officer,Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.B.Chandramohan, Advocate, Sr.No.2683 +1cc to Mr.R.Ganesan, Advocate, Sr.No.3007 C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.14 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 24.01.2011 smn SMA/2.2.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/