BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12481 of 2011 R.IYYAPPAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 1 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBASAMUDRAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.350 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. JAYAPAUL ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.1 was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.8.2011 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(B), 323, 506(ii) of IPC r/w 3(I)(X) of SC/ST (POA) Act in Crime No.350 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 11.8.2011 and the case has been registered against 3 persons and the petitioner is arrayed as A1 and he was arrested on the same day and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and investigation is considerably over and A2 and A3 were already enlarged on bail and hence, he come forward with this application and he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) would submit the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 11.8.2011 and they got red handedly on the same day. He fairly conceded that the injured was treated only as out patient and investigation is going on and one previous case is pending against the petitioner and hence, he https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, it could be seen that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 11.8.2011 and the case has been registered under Sections 294(B), 323, 506(ii) of IPC r/w Section 3(I)(X)of SC/ST (POA) Act and the injured was treated as out patient and the petitioner was arrested on the same day and investigation is already over and A2 and A3 were already enlarged on bail. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli District and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamuthiram, Tirunelveli District daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 20/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AMBASAMUTHIRAM, NELLAI DISTRICT 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBASAMUDRAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI 1. CC to M/S. JAYAPAUL ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.32184: DM::2011:SEPTEMBER:21:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12481 of 2011 Date :20/09/2011 2P:7C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/