IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY TUESDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2011 / 21ST ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3590 of 2010() ------------------------------------ CC.103/2003 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOLLAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 3 & 4 ---------------------------------------------- 1. SAROJINI, W/O.KOCHU GOVINDAN, PULLIYIL KIZHAKETHIL JAYANTHI COLONY, DREAM NAGAR-66, VARAMPEL JUNCTION, RAMANKULLANGARA, KAVANADU.P.O, KOLLAM. 2. LATHA, D/O.KOCHU GOVINDAN, PULLIYIL KIZHAKETHIL JAYANTHI COLONY, DREAM NAGAR-66, VARAMPEL JUNCTION, RAMANKULLANGARA, KAVANADU.P.O, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.RAFEEK. V.K. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS -------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. BINDUMOL, D/O.KOCHU GOVINDAN, PULLIYIL KIZHAKETHIL JAYANTHI COLONY, DRAM NAGAR-66, VARAMPEL JUNCTION, RAMANKULLANGARA, KAVANADU.P.O, KOLLAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss CRMC. NO.3590/2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES A1:- COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT. AII:- COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DTD. 9.8.2010. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL:- TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 3590 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of July, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners are accused Nos. 3 and 4 in Crime No. 34 of 2008 of East Police Station, Kollam for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 r/w Section 34 I.P.C and now pending as C.C. No. 103 of 2008 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kollam. The petitioners and respondent No.3 state that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the third respondent is not interested to proceed with the case. If that be so, respondent No.3 shall make a statement before the learned Magistrate in the aforementioned case. In that event if the learned Magistrate is satisfied that the matter has been amicably settled, then he shall close the matter. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv