IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.392 of 2008 AMARENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 11.9.2008 In the instant writ application the petitioners pray for a direction to the respondent no.3, the I,G., Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur, to conclude his enquiry in view of the order passed dated 31.1.2007 passed in Cr.W.J.C. No.509 of 2005. The wife of the petitioner no.2 had earlier filed a writ application being Cr.W.J.C. No.509/05 stating that the investigation is not being carried out in a proper and impartial way.This Court after considering the materials put forth by the petitioners observed that if a representation is filed before the I.G.,Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur , he would examine the same. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order the wife of petitioner no.2 filed a detailed representation on 10.3.2007. The grievance of the petition – ers is that the I.G., Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur, has not examined the representation as yet. The learned counsel for the State submits that the enquiry has already been conducted by Additional Director General of Police – cum- I. G. Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur.So the order of this Court is being duly complied with. This application is disposed of with an observation that investigation of the case would be concluded at its earliest as the matter is of 2005. 2 It goes without saying that petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding in the court below. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)