- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 157 OF 2007 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 250 OF 2007 Aasmanidevi D. Gupta Applicant vs. The state of maharashtra & Ors. Respondents Ms. Manjiri S. Parasnis, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.P. Adsule, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 13, 2008 PC . Heard. By this application, applicant prays for condonation of delay of 65 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application. 2. Applicant is the original informant. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the after the accused were acquitted, the applicant waited in hope that the State would file appeal against the order of acquittal. As the State did not file an appeal, applicant has filed the Revision Application. The applicant with - 2 - her family had gone to Uttar Pradesh for some time due to death of a relatives, and therefore, there has been some delay. In my view, the delay has been sufficiently explained. The application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Rule is made absolute accordingly. Sd/- [ D. G. KARNIK, J.]