BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12005 of 2011 B.SENTHIL KUMAR ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODALUR PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. ( CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.DHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (B), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.399 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the sole accused and he is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the alleged occurrence has been taken place in respect of money transaction and investigation is considerably over and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the petitioner apprehend for arrest and he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that because of money transaction, the alleged occurrence took place and the petitioner refused to repay the money and abused the defacto complainant with criminal intimidation and the case has been registered. He fairly conceded that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 4.9.2011 due to money transaction and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and even though the petitioner was not arrested neither he interfered with the investigation nor he absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai, and executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned court daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 20/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODALUR PUDUR POLICE STATION MADURAI. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S.DHAYALAN Advocate SR.No.32487 GH : 22.09.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12005 of 2011 Date :20/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/