IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13716 of 2008 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus NIRMAL KUMAR JHA ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : None ------------- P R E S E N T Hon’ble the Chief Jusitce & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal, ----------- Dated, the 11th September, 2008. The counsel for the petitioner submits that way back in the year 2001, the respondent herein was offered an appointment to GDS post on compassionate ground but the respondent did not avail of the said offer. He, therefore, submits that the direction given by the Tribunal to consider the case of the present respondent for the GDS post was unjustified and unwarranted. 2. It appears that the present respondent was offered appointment to GDS post which, he did not accept in the year 2001 but before the Tribunal, counsel for the present petitioners (respondents therein) agreed for a suitable order after noticing that earlier offer was not accepted by the original applicant. This is what the Tribunal observed in the order impugned: 2 “The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of the facts coming out from the pleadings, this Court may dispose of this matter with direction as it may deem suitable, pointing out that earlier the applicant had not accepted a GDS post which was offered to him.” 3. In our view, the order passed by the Tribunal does not call for any interference. 4. Writ petition does not deserve to be admitted and is liable to be dismissed. It is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. R.M. Lodha, CJ Anil/ Kishore K. Mandal, J.