IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47509 of 2008 KUNTI DEVI @ SRIMATI KUNTI DEVI W/O-Bijay Kumar, R/O-Vill-Tetariya, Beldari, P.S.-Muffasil, Nawadah, Distt.-Nawadah. …………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 3/ 17.02.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that the informant’s daughter Sanju Kumari was kidnapped on 09.08.2008. The informant suspected hand of the petitioner and her family members in the kidnapping. It appears that occurrence of 09.08.2008 has been reported on 14.08.2008. It has been submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that the petitioner’s only fault was that she was instrumental in getting the victim talked with her mother. Learned Counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that in course of investigation witnesses have stated that the petitioner is instrumental in commission of such offences from before also. - 2 - Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in connection with Muffasil (Nawadah) P.S. Case No. 78 of 2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)