IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9006 of 2010 SIDHESHWAR KUMAR PANDEY @ CHHOTAN PANDEY, S/O LATE SHIVPUJAN PANDEY @ SHIVARCHAN PANDEY, R/O VILLAGE – AGARPURA, P.S. – BARHARA, DISTRICT - BHOJPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 06.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that demand of “rangdari” is not followed by its delivery, rather, false allegation is made due to complaint against informant’s misdeed about misappropriation of fund to concern authorities, alongwith, a P.I.L. by his daughter. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 15 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Arrah subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Praful ( Mandhata Singh, J.)