IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 11770 of 2004 Between: M.Krupakar, s/o M.Venkataiah, r/o H.No.3-30, Prashanthi Hills, Meerpet Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, Telugu Sankshema Bhavan, Masabtank, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal, A.P.S.W.R.School, Yella Reddy, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representations, dated 12-6-2002 for his continuous service as Trained Graduate Teacher (Maths) in preference to his juniors in spite of repeated reminder representations, dt.30-10-2002, 13-6-2003, 9-12-2003 and 14-6-2004 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reengage the services of the petitioner as Trained Graduate Teacher (Maths) forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.M.NAIDU, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.Vijay Bhaskar Moola, Advocate The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.11770 of 2004 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation, dated 12.6.2002 for his continuous service as Trained Graduate Teacher (Maths) as illegal and arbitrary. Admittedly, the petitioner gave a representation, dated 12.6.2002 to the respondents to consider his case and it is said to be pending. Thereafter, the petitioner made several representations, dated 30.10.2002, 13.6.2003, 9.12.2003 and 14.6.2004 to the respondents. Heard Sri J.M.Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Vijay Bhaskar Moola, learned counsel has taken notice for the respondents and opposed the same. The respondents have to take appropriate decision basing on the performance of the petitioner whether to continue him in the next academic year or not. In view of the above, a direction is given to the respondents to consider the applications of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________ (K.C.BHANU,J.) 9th July, 2004 bcj To 1. The Secretary, A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, Telugu Sankshema Bhavan, Masabtank, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal, A.P.S.W.R.School, Yella Reddy, Nizamabad District. 3.Two C.D. copies Note: Furnish copy within one week B/o bcj