IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23822 of 2011 Sujit Kumar Srivastava @ Sujit Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. --------------- 02. 17.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Sadar Hajipur P.S. Case No. 409/2010, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, is named accused in this case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. besides possibility of his second marriage which is denied and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is also not sure about such allegation. Submission is that the petitioner intends to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with the complainant who is one and only wife. Counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2 also submits that there is positive response of such submission. In view of the above, on filing of an application before the court below by petitioner stating such intention/joint petition duly signed by 2 complainant and petitioner affixing their pair photographs stating such intention with specific mention of their place of stay in company of each other with an undertaking to appear before the court below on the date fixed for the purpose and report about their conduct. in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Sadar Hajipur P.S. Case No. 409/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. It is further made clear that only after being satisfied of conduct of the parties the court below shall pass the orders in accordance with law. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)