HEGH CGURT GF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2248 of 2001 WRET PETITEQN UNBER ARTECLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSHTUTION OF INDIA S35 Ean’iaie Shri Satish Ka Agnihotri, J. Pi‘ssem: Shri Kshitii Shanna. Advocate for the netmoner. Shri Arum Sao, Govezmnem Advocate for the State. GREMER GRAL) (Passed on 07“ day of Augusi, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the peii’iioner pleads :10 inStruc’iions. The petitionei‘ may not be interested in pursuing ihe matier. 2. En View ofthe aimve, themae‘ter is dismissed for Want of presecmion. Sd/— Satish K. Agimmmi i Judge Amit mn PETETIONER Smt. Viridma Agawal W70 Shri Bharatla1 Agrawal, aged about 54 years, Resident of Awailii Nagar, Distt. Raipur (Chha‘itisgarh) VERSUS RESPONBENTS : 1. Siate of Chhai‘iisgarh, Through the Celiector, Raipmx 2. The Presidimg Officar and Sub Divisional Officer (Ravenue) Raiyur? (Clinanisgarh) 3. Basam Yadav S/o Nakbundiya Yadav (Up Sarpanch) Age 3?. years, R10 Krishak Nagar, Jora Distt. Raipur (CG) 9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \m WRIT PETETION No, 2248 ofZOOl Smt. Mridula Agrawal W/o Shri Bharatla} Agrawal, aged about 54 years, Resident of Awanti Nagar, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) garb, Through the Collector, Raipur. 2. The Presidixag Officer and Sub Divisional 3. Basant Yadav S/o Nakbundiya Yadav (Up PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Siate of Chhattis WRET PETITEON 0% cer (Revenue) Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Sarpamh) Age 32 years, R/o Krishak Nagar, Jora Disii. Raigur (CG) UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SBI Him’ble Shri Satish K. AQQ‘ otri, J, _ Shri Kshjtij Shanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Saog Government Advocate for the State. ORDER GRAI; 7 (Passed on 07‘ day of August, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instructions. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In View ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. \ Sdl- keesh K. Agm‘ r‘ hatii mit g