jo^ •o-d"i QMI p ^e uoipss 4l!M pesj socl joj pesnooe Q{\} jo qoea pepiAuoo seq pue AqejeqM (96/917Z'ON |BUI suoiss^ eqi Aq possed 966kOl'-Z P^ep eoueiue^ eqi isujeCe 'jndeyiiqLuy (|!er le^ueo ^u^ @ uo-i y eisaCeN uepueqo pssnooe Aq rf •luepuodsej/e^s eq^ joj jeA/w^ •iue||9dde Q[\}\ {"O'd'JQ (^) frZS uoipes J^pun |eedde leuiLuuo} ('O'O) efn6jns •USIQ (i|neieg:uo!^s 93i|0d 'eBjeqo -u| 9L|i q6nojqi (4je6s!ueqqop 9^3 - snsjel ('O'O) efn6jns •USJQ '!|neieg -s'd 'ejej euAeqg 'efes n6uie~i :96e||!AP siuepjsej qiog (sjeaA oi7 inoqe p96y 'jBMuex uioi o/s 'iuejeqpoog @ uo~] -^ •sjeeA zz inoqe ps6v 'eiseOeN ^1049 o/S 'eiseeeN uepueuo J_ l^lh> kD]h> <^ >l^lej> (J^^J^ Jl^ktk 1-^b^bKb uoipes jepun eoueyojo UOJSSILULUOO 96pnp suojsseg peujeei jepunejeqM >S uj jnde>|iqLuv (96pnr suoisses JO JQpJO pUB UOIplAUOO p iu9Lu6pnf pueiuuedns QMI q6nojqi luejeqpoog ejj9j9jd u99q seq leedde sjqi - :p -oopeqg •o-i SIBQ uop8^0!piu9iu6pnf|ejo q |9UBd (|eMBj6v ejpujAey "j|/\| jo^ lesunoo (ei4so>| nuqsi.A j|/\| ZOOZ-01.-9Z TP 'eyujs JBiun>| |iuns 'JIAI Q|q<uoH pue oopeyg -Q^ -J|A| eiq.uoH :4oueg UOISIAJQ :lN3aNOdS3y ^- d'er ui) :C[ | NV-1-iqrld^L i^ito D^ >teii^s > ;!\ /, ^foSk^ i^{^ IhtD Mai^Sj itte 1^^ ( &sbS»EljkS») tbfeh l^l^ 400Z lji...........4t.....»..^.......;...,......,.^.....^M^ J^Ititt >^H>101sj '2>lr^<»' b01h.lb- ^2£ ^ ^Af 8Z.—3: !C—78 3^£T^|<4|^, ^>T{1-M<l<o, fslOKiy ^w^ 'gs^ra? &.^. wi^ 2007 3TT^?r XR^ (yil^^) a?n^r^T'RF?w ^^ ^n^T ^i^sN' ^ / M' Ai.. ^RnW^f^T^^T Chl^id^l'l 'W^ff ^fe^ <F3|«fl< ^3iRlH3TT^T committing the murder of Basant ^ imprisonment for life. As the accused persons arej Koshta, Advocate, to represent the Time was given to Mr. Vishnu Kosl| record was given to him. He pref) learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is barred by 3,^39 Having heard learned couns< record. Case of the prosecution is that deceased) went near the house o nd sentenced each of them to undergo unrepresented, we appointed Mr. Vishnu iccused/appellants and argue this appeal. ita to go through the record and original ared the case and thereafter, we heard days' delay, as per the Office report. ?1 for the parties, we have perused the |on 5-7-1995 at about 8 p.m. Basant (since accused/appellant Lori and demanded Chandan Nagesia & Gulabi Bai, at t tobacco from him. He entered into alt^rcation with Lori and co-accused persons jiat time, the accused/appellants attacked ^» ,„„«,.,,»^u»u,upp»,.,,,» ,,„„„ the deceased with Tabbal, axe, Bs|hinga & Lathi as a result of which he succumbed to the injuries sustainedt^ mortem examination to Primary Heal (PW-6) conducted post-mortem and two bruises, one swelling on left jaw ^nd ^rd th present, his 2na, 3ra & 4Tn ribs were fra| of death was muttiple injuries on head| a result of syncope & haemorrhage, de / him. Body of Basant was sent for post- th Centre, Batauli where Dr. S.P. Gupta loticed as many as five incised wounds, and fracture of jaw, even tooth were not )tured. The doctor has opined that cause and other injuries. The deceased died as ath was homicidal in nature. Sukhan (PW-2) is the eyewit^iess who has categoricatly stated that accused Lori @ Boodharam & Chan(pan Nagesia attacked the deceased with Tabbal & Lathis and they ranaway| In cross-examination of this witness, [C—78 ^ESf ^W\^, ^Tfl'y'Ko, fs)01'M^< WW ^^."...••"••6:)-"ft"l"5::-Y"-"""-^ 200-7 3n^?r XR^ (^?^^) 3^T^T^ii^ WT3?I^IW?$N7 h^ Soma /" ..6' ^nw^rf^T^n^ defence has not been able to elicti evidence ofthis witness. In view of the above medicall the accused persons were authors c|1 any illegality or infirmity in the judgm| of merit. Therefore, this appeal is di| on merits. Consequently, I.A.No.1 stavnds| Copy of the judgment be| Superintendent, Central Jail, Ambika): Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge <sbl^i<rtAh'1 iTO^f '^jfet3t <Rn^i< ^3iRFT3TT^r any circumstance which discredits the and ocular evidence, it is established that the crime in question and we do not find mt of the trial Court. This appeal is devoid >missed on the ground of delay as well as disposed of. sent to the appellants through the lur. _-- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge