1 S.B.Criminal Misc.Second Bail Appl. No.2647/2006 (Ramesh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 12.7.2006 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. This is second bail application filed by petitioner Ramesh. The first bail application came to be dismissed by order dt. 25.8.2005 taking note of the fact that in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, the knife was recovered from petitioner Ramesh, which was evident from the recovery memo. The allegation against petitioner Ramesh is that he inflicted knife injuries to PW.7 Kalu and PW.10 Shyamlal. I have carefully gone through the statements of these two injured eye-witnesses. Apart from these two eye-witnesses, other witnesses have also stated that petitioner Ramesh was armed with a knife and intended to inflict injuries to the deceased but PW.7 came in between and, therefore, injury could not be inflicted. He inflicted injuries to PW.7 and PW.10. It appears from the statement of Doctor, who examined these two injured alleged to have been inflicted by the petitioner, that injury No.2 suffered by PW.10 Shyamlal was found to be grievous in nature. The petitioner 2 alleged to have repeatedly inflicted injuries to the injured. In the circumstances, therefore, I do not think it a fit case to grant bail to petitioner Ramesh. Accordingly, the bail application filed by petitioner Ramesh under section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-