1 criapln2739-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2739 OF 2011 1] Vachishta s/o Rangnath Babar 2] Gowardhan s/o Jivan Gore ...APPLICANTS Vs 1] The State of Maha. ...RESPONDENT ... Shri A.I.Tikle, Adv.for applicant. Shri B.J.Sonawane,APP for R-State. ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 15/07/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.40/11 registered in Pimpalner Police Station, Dist.Beed, for offences punishable U/s 366 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. Papers of investigation are made available by A.P.P. Both sides are heard. 2] Crime is registered on the basis of report given by father of prosecutrix. Father has made allegation that applicant no.1 used to send messages on mobile phone and he saw the messages when he went through the record of S.M.S. of the mobile phone of the 2 criapln2739-11 prosecutrix. He has made allegations that since 9 p.m. on 29/5/11, prosecutrix was missing and so he had suspicion that present applicant had kidnapped her. Papers of investigation show that prosecutrix is major. She has disclosed that on that evening she had returned from the parents house and that she was afraid of the father and father was against her relationship with applicant no.1. She had come across police also when she was roaming after leaving house. At that time also, she had disclosed that the applicants had not taken her away from the house. The record shows that the father refused to take custody of prosecutrix when there was such circumstance in the Court of Magistrate. In these circumstances, this Court holds that there is no need of custodial interrogation. Ad-interim relief granted in favour of the applicants stands confirmed. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln2739-11