IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2008 / 4TH MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 69 of 2008(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20389/2005 Dated 09/09/2005 .................... : PETITIONERS/ ----------------------------- 1. FILESIUS P.,S/O.PHILIP,AGED 44 YEARS MUNDIYIL KIZHAKKATHIL,MUKUNDAPURAM PO, CHAVARA,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. KOUSALYA.T.D/O.THEVAN, AGED 45 YERAS SARANYALAM,ITHOTTUVA, WEST KALLADA, KARUNAGAPPALLY,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. SUDEESHA.S, W/O. KUSALAN, AGED 46 YEARS VADAKKETTATHU VEEDU,PONMANA PO,CHAVARAM KOLLAM DISTRICT AYYATHU VEEDU, CHERIYAZHEEKKAL PO KARUNAGAPPALLY,KOLLAM DISTGRICT. 4. SARASWATHI.B, W/O.RAJAH,AGED 46 YEARS EDAYILA VEEDU,CHARUKADU, CHEMMAKKADU PO, PERINADU,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. NOORJAHAN.K.,W/O.EBRAHIMKUTTY, AGED 52 YEARS, PANAMOOTTIL VEEDU MULANKADAKAM, KOLLAM. 6. RADHAMANI.T.,W/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNAN AGED 52 YEARS PUTHENVILA VEEDU,NORTH MYLAKKADU, KANNANALLOOR P.O.,KOLLAM. 7. SASIYAMMA .K.,W/O.THANKARAJAN,AGED 42 YEARS CHEMBUMTHARAYIL,PONMANA PO, CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 8. R.SUBHADRA,W/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 46 YEARS MUNDAKKAL VEEDU MANGADU P.O., KOLLAM. 9. VASANTHA KUMARI.M., W/O. LATE SASIDHARAN CHETTIYAR, AGED 46 YEARS M.S.NIVAS KOONAYIL, NEDUNGOLAM PO, PARAVOOR KOLLAM DISTRICT. -2- 10. LILLY.C,W/O.VENU,AGED 44 YEARS AMBIKA VILASAM,ARUNODAYAM,KOLLAM PONMANA PO, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 11. LEELAMANY.V, W/O.LATE AMBUJAKSHAN AGED 52 YEARS LIBU NIVAS,MAYYANAD, KOLLAM. 12. ELIAMMA.A,W/O.JOSEPH,AGED 45 YEARS INDUVILA VEEDU,MYLOM PO,KOTTARAKKARA,KOLLAM. 13. USHA.G, W/O. LATE NALINAKSHAN AGED 43 YEARS, PANACKAL PADINJATTATHIL NERAVIL, PERINADU PO, KOLLAM. 14. NASEEMA BEEVI,W/O.MUHAMMED RAFI, AGED 52 YEARS PANAMOOTTIL VEEDU, PUNNATHALA, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DR.SHYLAJA, AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT TRIVANDRUM 2. DR.V.SASIDHARAN PILLAI AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICE KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- Contempt Case (C).69/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT In the nature of the directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 9.9.2005, I am of the view that no contempt as such has been made out in this Contempt of Court Case. I also take note of the fact that several among the petitioners in the writ petitions, disposed of under Annexure-I, were actually given appointment subsequently as is admitted by the petitioners. Apparently, the process is still going on. In the result, I do not think that this is a fit case to proceed with, under the Contempt of Courts Act. Accordingly Contempt of Court Case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to take appropriate action in relation to Annexures-2 and 3 or other similar representations, if available to them in law and if so advised. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs