WP 2838/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2838/2011 Yamunabai Kisan Kodre V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri V.D. Patnurkar, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.V. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.2. Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent no.3. Shri Manish Nilwant, Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 26.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is contending that vide the impugned resolution of the Gram Sabha, the constitution of the Water Supply Committee is being changed. It is submitted that the same is being done on the basis of WP 2838/11 2 the Government resolution, which is set aside by this Court. The perusal of the record would reveal that in the intervening period, the term of the Grampanchayat has come to an end. As per the concerned Government resolutions, the term of the erstwhile Water Supply Committee comes to an end along with the term of the Grampanchayat and after that, a new committee is required to be constituted in the election held by the Gram Sabha. In the reply submitted on behalf of the Gram Sevak of the village panchayat, it is categorically stated that the new committee has been elected in a meeting of the Gram Sabha, which was attended by 48% of the members of the Gram Sabha. As the petitioner disputes the correctness and otherwise of the proceedings of the Gram Sabha, it cannot be done in the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as it would involve the disputed questions of fact. WP 2838/11 3 In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. The petition is rejected. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 26.09.2011 ndk/c26911