IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25305 of 2008 MD. ISRAFIL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.11.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Section 366A of the Penal Code. The petitioner is stated to be father of the boy who allegedly abducted daughter of the informant to whom he used to give tuition. From the statements made in Para 3 of the order of rejection that son of the petitioner and the allegedly victim girl were not minors, that they had married, three children were born out of the marriage and they were living in matrimonial bliss as husband and wife, this Court finds it difficult to appreciate the nature of the order passed rejecting the application for anticipatory bail in mechanical manner without realizing the consequences of the matter. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM Madhubani in Jainagar PS Case No. 04 of 2003, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The duty of the Courts is to resolve matrimonial conflicts and not to generate matrimonial conflicts. Let a copy of the order be placed before the District Judge, Madhubani. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)