IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1425 OF 2010 Between: Chaganti Rama Rao ..... PETITIONER AND The APSRTC, represented by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1425 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order and decree, dated 22.12.2009, in I.A.No.1138 of 2009 in I.A.No.618 of 2009 in O.S.No.142 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, whereunder and whereby, the petition filed under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for appointment of an Advocate – Commissioner to note down the physical features of the petition schedule property, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Petitioner herein claims to be the tenant and his tenancy seems to be over. However, the respondents filed written statement, wherein they have not disputed about the identity of the petition schedule property. When there is no dispute with regard to the identity of the property, the question of noting down the physical features of the property in question does not arise. Therefore, the trial Court rightly dismissed the petition. Hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J April 13, 2010 MD