IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1974 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1974 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1974 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL ST.NO. 7037 OF 2006. APPEAL ST.NO. 7037 OF 2006. APPEAL ST.NO. 7037 OF 2006. The New India Assurance Co.Ltd. ... Applicant. Versus. Ashok Ramchandra Chavan and ors. ... Respondents. Ms.Ratna Bhargavan i/by M/s.R.Bhargavan & Associates for the Applicant Shri M.G.Barve for the Respondent No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th July, 2006. : 24th July, 2006. : 24th July, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. In view of what is held in paragraph 31 of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of National Insurance Co.Ltd. v/s. Nicolletta Rohtagi [(2002) 7 S.C.C. 456], the Appeal at the instance of the Appellant is primafacie maintainable. After having heard the Advocates appearing for the parties, I find that a sufficient cause for condonation of delay of two days is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Judge. Judge. Judge.