IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 1ST OCTOBER 2009 / 9TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 654 of 2007(C) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- LEELA PAUL, W/O. PAUL, AGED 60 YEARS, PUTHOOR HOUSE, UDAYANAGAR, KEERAMKULANGARA, EAST FORT P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THRISSUR CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR. 2. SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR. 3. MAYOR, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATIO FOR R1 TO 3 SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.654/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF RECEIPT BEARING NO.24314 DATED 20/09/2006 ISSUED BY R2. P2 : COPY OF NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE OF SHRI.K.P.VARGHESE DATED 28/07/2006, SUBMITTED ALONG WITH THE COMPLETION CERTIFICATE PRESENTED TO R2. P3 : COPY OF LOCATION CERTIFICATE AND LOCATION SKETCH OF THE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE CONSTRUCTED BY THE PETITIONER, ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHEMBUKAVU VILLAGE DATED 20/06/2006. P4 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETIITOENR BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25/10/2006. P5 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 08/11/2006. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------ WP(C) No.654 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated, this the 1st day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition was to direct the respondents to number the residential building constructed by the petitioner in Survey No.388 of Chembukavu Village. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission on 05/01/2007, this Court directed the respondents to provisionally number the aforesaid residential building. It is now reported by the petitioner that in compliance with the said order, the building has been numbered. 3. Although, the respondents have entered appearance, so far no counter affidavit has been filed. Therefore, there is no reason for me not to accept the case as pleaded in the writ petition. 4. Having regard to the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the provisional number assigned to the aforesaid residential building of petitioner in pursuance to order dated 05/01/2007 will be regularised. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg