xdM é, {A IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR lq5é W. P.NO. OF 2002 PETITIONER : Sudesh Paul S/ o Late Surendra Pau1,'aged about 4O Year‘s, R/o Tarbahar, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ,af' 1. Union of India through RESPONDENTS v T Secretary Ministry of Railways, New Delhi I x' u‘ Jr" 2. General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Garden-reach, Kolkatta (West Bengal) 3. Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (CG) . Sr. Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Soum Eastern Railway, Bilaspur (CG) k?¢w WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS; ORDER OR ORDERS: The petitioners above—named most respectfully submit as under: l. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: As mentioned in the Cause Title above. N PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned in the Cause Title abovea / \‘A. l J XI—HC—78 é? w-RNo. N56/Q0°2‘ Wm m zoo WW (Wu) mwm wmm mmm x '~ WW wW émfmm 1—10-2W04 Shri Manindra Shrivasava, Jr‘dvocats for tbs pEiitiomr. 1:04, Shri V.V.S‘ Murthy} Dy. AJlVQcats Gmeral for rasyomlant no. 5. Application for urgent hearing is aEOWEd. Heard. The patitioner has filed this petition against the order dated 3-7-2902 passmi by tha respendent 110. 4. . Cemention of the counsel for the petitioner ris that the petitioner is a member of Gond tribe. It is submiited that on the basis of caste cem'ficate he was appointed in the year 1986. Sutvse quentiy, a ietter was issuecl from the office of Coilector as per Annexure P-12 d.tt'ed 30-1G-2060 and thereafter the services of the petitioner have been terminatec as per Annexme-P-H dated 3-7~2002. It is submitted that the petitioner submitted a rehresentation 21S per Annexure P‘15. Counsel for the petitioner submits that now the collector haS issued ietters' dated 30—7-2003 anti 17-9-2003 for con the petitioner submitted that a eetion be issued to the respondent no. 2 to 03 anti 17-9-2003; Let the matter be consid red by the competent authority as early as possible preferahly'within 3 mon from the date of production of this order,.in accordance with law. This petition stands dispose of at this stage with liberty to file afresh. / Shn' Vinay Han't, Sr. Standi‘rmg Counsel for Union of indiaf respcndems 130. 4 - 2 ing the service of the petitioner. Counsei for t di‘ G consider the document dated 30-7 M.W.P. No, 624/2002 also tands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sdl u ~ t ‘