WRIT PETITION No 2V7 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONERS I THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C G 1 :1. Hemshankar Deshlahra S/o. Shri D.Deshlarha, aged about 40 years, ChiefMunicipal Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) :2. SJKDubey, S/o. Shri S.N.Dubey, aged about 40 years, Chief Municipal Officer, Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon (C G) :3. Lokeshwar Sahu S/o. Shri Kejaovram Sahu aged about 38 years, Chief Municipal Officer. Rajhandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) :4. P.R Dhruva S/o. Shri B.R.Dhruva, aged about 45 years Chief MuniCipal Officer %"Cl‘€b~ D isii {Bayia’ifg Ca) SS PONDENT Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Town Administration and Development Department DKS Bhavan, Raipur District Raipur (CG) / N PA$E NO.. , ‘§ 2) 4) Prqmod Shukla S/o. Not known Chief Municipal Officer Municipality Balauda Bazar District Raipur (C.G). Nilambar Naik S/o. not known Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council, Raigarh (C.G.). Himanshu Tiwari S/o. not known Chief Municipal Officer Municipality, Kurud District Durg (C.G.). ta (x mmmm W$§§w§m ‘& wrfs’rar *‘ 05—04—2003 5hri R.N.Jha, counsel for +he pe‘rifioner-s‘ Ahuja, Shri Panel Sanjay Lawyer, K. for Agmwal, The 5hEr Advooa‘l'e General wi‘fh Smf. Anju Heard. pe‘fi‘rion challenged ‘l'he order dn'l'ed 18-07-2002 (Annexure—P/l), pas d by The responden‘r No.1 promdfing respondenfs 2 To 4 To The posf of Chief Municipal Officers, Class-I. Learned counsel for 1'he laws of fhe Corporation There is o provision To give promoTion To iTs employees from The posT of Rev nue Officer direcTly To The po’sT of Chief Municipal Officer, Class-I. For,The promoTion To The posT of g.‘ Chief Municipal Officer, Class-I ., on advance copy. The pe'ri-tioners have in 111 i re is four Tier sysTem i.e., KK, K. scales. Learned counsel furTher submiTTed ThaT The peTiTioners have made represenTaTion To The SecreTary/respondenT NO.1 again T These promoTions vide Annexure— P/ZA, which has nqT yeT been dec Having considered The facT and circumsTances of The case and‘ maTerial on record, in The opinion f \This CourT ends of jusTice will be \ served if a direcTion is given To KH and 6 carrying differenT p \fresh represenTaTion’ along wiTh opy of peTiTion wiTh annexure and \ \ e i \ V XLHc-zz W‘i 200 mag ""2r — Wwnww ' rah-mm copy of fhis order before 'Hné S‘rafe/ resporiHenf No.1 within a momh from Today. If such a repesénfafion is filed fhe some sha“ be consndered and decided on W’ own merits In accordance with law as In view of fhis order M,W.P.No.225/2003 and I.A.No.620/2003 shmd disposed of. Cerfified copy as per wres‘. this peti‘rion is aispose‘d of wi'rh liberty Sdb _ Fakhruddm ‘ Judge [wwx ow?»§$§ Wm . w ‘7 MO LMDrJLmLi mwowa early as posSIkbgie preferably minim a period of it? mon'rhs from The do‘re of7‘epresenfa‘hon I Wrrh ‘i'hls observofion ’ fro Xaviail fhe remedy available in case any adverse order is passed.