Wp 1738 1 IN THE HICH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OFMOTION 225/2011 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS 130/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1738/1997 Mumbai Shramik Sangh Applicant/petitioner Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporn.Ltd.& Ors. Respondents And Maharashtra Rajya Mathadi Transport and General Kamgar Union (regd.) Applicant Shri.Bhavesh Parmar i/b Ms.Sandhya Mailagir in support for petitioner Mr.Vishal Talsania a/w Ms.Pallavi Dedhia i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co.for Res. CORAM- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE 19th April,2011 P.C. . Heard counsel for the parties. We are in agreement with the objection taken by the counsel for respondent no.1-Corporation that applications filed by the present applicant are ill-advised in as much as the applicant is not a party to the Writ Petition . 2 According to the counsel for the applicant, the members of the original writ petitioner have shifted their membership to the applicant- Wp 1738 2 Union. Even if the members of the applicant-Union and the writ petitioner Union were to be common, that does not take the matter any further. For, the applicant and the writ petitioner are separate legal entities . 3 In the circumstances, this Motion and Chamber Summons under consideration are rejected with liberty to the applicant to take recourse to such other remedy as may be permitted in law to ask for similar reliefs as claimed in W.P.1738/1997, if so advised. That will be considered on its own merits. 4 At this stage the counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant be permitted to withdraw the applications filed by the applicant in the Writ Petition. We accept this request and make it clear that if the applicant is entitled for any relief, in the substantive proceedings to be filed by the applicant, the same will have to be considered in accordance with law. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR ,J.)