IN THE HIGH COIET OF JUDICATURE AT BILétSPUEI (C$IATTISGARH) ml? K wRm’PETITION NoL9 33m 7g? 2% x DETAILS OF TEE PET/ITION PETXTIONER : Méf1bodhi Ham Cglak, son of géam Charan Ch&ak, ageé about J #3 years, presgntly working " as Superintendent of Land Records y at Janjgir-Champa, dist Janjgir-C‘nampa, in the office of Collecéor. (cum. VS. RE$PQNDENTS§ ‘ 1 State of Chhattiqgarh- Through: f kw if}. JD.K. fsécretary, Bhawan, Revénue Raipur §epar"3ment, (as). I gc%\&$9 .. ’ga‘cz‘gq "" t/ séate 2 The of Commi Chhitt§sgarh, Si ner of Land D.K.Bhawan, Records, ?§:;° $" vi 9T3” Baipur (C.G).V &‘.‘ WRIT ON UNDER ARTICLE 2 CONSTITUTION OF INDIgL 74/ y; W HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTI56ARH: BILASPUR 5ingle Bmch: Hon‘ble Shri Swish K. Agnihofri, J. Pe'i'i'rioner : Manbodhi Ram Chelak Versus Responden'fs .' S‘m'i'e of Chhaf'risgurh: Trough: Secre‘rary, Revenue Depar'rmenf, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur and ano‘rher‘. Miss Sharmiiu Shinghai, counsel for The petitioner. 5hri A5. Kachhawuha, Governmenf Advoca'l'e for- she Smfe/respondenfs. (10“ November, 2006) This is an applicafion for wifhdmwai of wrii' pefi-Hon on The grounds mentioned in fhe applicuiion, +0 which learned counsei appearing for 1413 respondenfs has no objecfion. The applicafion is ordered as prayed for. Consequenfiy, fhe wri'r pefifion is dismissed as wifhdrawn. No order as to cosis. uy ’ Sd/. satish K. Agnihom- r\ Judge i Subhush h ORDER I.A. No. 10088/2006. " ‘