IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8381 of 2008 Decided on: 24.2.2011 Ms. Soma Verma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition to enable her client to make a representation for the redressal of her grievance, as contained in the petition. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the Principal Secretary (Education) within a period of three weeks from today. The Principal Secretary (Education) shall decide the representation by passing a speaking order within a further period of four weeks after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge February 24, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?