Ladda1 caw-1973-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1973 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5569 OF 2006. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders . Mr N.V. Bandiwadekar, Advocates for the Applicants. . Mr S.D.Patil,Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr P.S.Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr Pratap Patil, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr Khemani, A.G.P.for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 20th September, 2011. P.C.: 1. This civil application is taken out for permission to amend the writ petition, in terms of schedule annexed to the civil application. I have perused the proposed amendment. Same is necessitated because of the development of the subsequent events, Ladda2 caw-1973-11 during the pendency of the aforesaid writ petition. The proposed amendment is not contrary, or inconsistent with the original case made out in the writ petition. In my view, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioners are allowed to carry out proposed amendment, inasmuch as the respondents always can deny the averments in the proposed amendment by filing reply. 2. In the above circumstances, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment shall be carried within a period of two days from today. Needless to mention that the respondents are at liberty to file reply to the amended pleadings. The civil application is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)