IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19703 of 2010 1. SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH @ SUDHIR KUMAR, S/O SRI BAIDYA NATH PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE TANGRAHA, P.S. MINAPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 2. VIJAY KUMAR SINGH, S/O SRI RAM CHANDRA SINGH, R/O VILLAGE SARHACHIYA, P.S. AURAI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR, THE THEN PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GORIGAMA, MINAPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 06.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners, named accused in this case, Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary, carries allegation of committing some irregularities with respect to implementation of Indira Awas Yojna. With almost similar allegations earlier against the petitioners Minapur P.S. Case no. 259 of 2008 dated 23.12.2008 was instituted and subsequently, during the pendency of the same, instant case has been lodged. In earlier case the petitioners have already been granted the privilege by another Bench of this Court vide Order dated 15.5.2009 in Cr.Misc. no. 16290 of 2009. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 2 two petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in Minapur P.S. Case no. 143 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for two years or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad