IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2007 / 3RD MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 12430 of 2006(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- RAJESH, S/O.SATHYENDRAN ELAYEDATH, ELAYEDATH HOUSE P.O, KULATHARA, KOZHIKODE-673 655. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.12430/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24.12.2005. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE SCHOOL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY DATED 3.01.2006. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE TOPICS RELATING TO VISUAL IMPAIRMENT WHICH THE PETITIONER HAD STUDIED FOR M.SC. HEALTH AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE TOPICS WHICH THE LECTURER IN SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR VISUALLY HANDICAPPED HAS TO TEACH. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE P.R.RAMAN, J. ``````````````````````````` W.P.(C) NO. 12430 OF 2006 ``````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2007 J U D G M E N T This writ petition was filed at the time when the application submitted by the petitioner for the post of Lecturer in Special Education for Visually Handicapped was rejected taking the view that a post graduation in Health and Behavioural science is not a sufficient qualification for the post applied for. The Syndicate decided the qualification of the petitioner sufficient for the post applied for. Accordingly he was interviewed along with other candidates and was selected. 2. However, as regards the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, there arises no occasion now to consider the question in this writ petition. In view of the above factual situation, this writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE Rp