IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2009 / 15TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21660 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ PAPPADAKKARAKATH SAIDALAVI, S/O.YAHU, MURIVAZHIKKAL, PACHATTIRI AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, K.S.E.B, TIRUR WEST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. T.V.ISMAIL, S/O.HAMSA, MURIVAZHIKKAL, P.O.PARAVANNA, PACHATTIRI AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R2 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 21660 OF 2009 (B) ===================== Dated this the 6th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he applied for supply of electricity to his residential premises situated in R.S.No.193/4 of Pachattiri Amsom. In this writ petition, he complains that despite even a direction issued by the 1st respondent as per Ext.P2, power supply is not given. 2. On instructions, the standing counsel for the respondents points out that when attempt was made to draw line to the petitioner's residential premises, objections were raised and thereupon the respondents have moved the 1st respondent by an application made on 28/1/2009, for removing the obstruction. It is stated that orders are awaited and therefore, further progress could not be made. 3. Evidently therefore obstruction has been raised by third parties against drawing the line to the petitioner's premises. If that be so, the concerned Assistant Executive Engineer has to necessarily move the 1st respondent, which has been done. 4. Now that proceedings are thus pending before the 1st WPC 21660/09 :2 : respondent as per the application made by the Assistant Executive Engineer on 28/1/2009, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall expedite orders on such application with notice to the parties and on the production of a copy of this judgment. 5. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp