^ a^ jSe Bench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. e2^'^€ QF 2011 ^ PETITIONER : ^^•^. 7...;.-Y-^^^:" ..«•""°*_'. A \..7^**'*" L.^*^ » ^•^•:'^^:\\\ - •^^w;\^ ^^^^^ v ^ RESPONDENTS Nageshwar Prasad Kaushik, S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal, aged about 54 years, Working on the post of Sub-Inspector, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Naila, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. ' Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, through: Its Managing Director, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Deputy Director, Krishi Vipnan Board, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Naila, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .\ <v7 HS^H^OURT_OFCHEATTJS^ARMAr_B!LASP^UR (Hon. Mr Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P(S).No.3178of2011 Petrtsoner Nageshwar Prasad Kaushik VERSUS Respondents Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board and others Present: Shri V.K. Pandey, counse! for the petjtloner. ShriY.S. Thakur, counse! for respondents No.1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. ORDER (09.11.2011) The grievance of the petitloner Is that he has not been granted any increment titl date though his suspension order dated 29.12.2001 was revoked on 05.07.2007. 2 Learned counsel forrespondents No.1 & 2 submlts that representation of the petitioner is under consideration and the order would be passed very soon. 3. !n view of the above submission, learned counsel fbr the petltioner wants to withdraw this petition. However, he prays that the respondent be directed to take the decision in the case of the petitioner expeditjoosiy. 4. The present petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. !t is expected from respondents No.1 & 2 to pass appropriate order in the case of the petltioner within a period of two months^rom today. F Priya Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge