IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30275 of 2009 BINU SHUKLA @ BINAY KUMAR SHUKLA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 04.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for Opposite party no. 2. The defence in a Police case under Sections 406, 409, 420 and other provisions of the Penal Coder is that the petitioner is the maternal cousin of the deceased husband of the informant, concealing which F.I.R. represents the petitioner to be a person unknown to the informant with whom the deceased husband had business relations. Counsel for the informant does not deny the relationship to submit that the petitioner had wrongly and forcibly occupied the commercial premises in question and that she was left with no source of livelihood. The submission, therefore, is that on the own showing of the informant, the dispute is civil in nature. Considering the submission only for the purpose of bail, let the petitioner, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhagalpur in Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S. case No. 187 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)