IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19245 of 2010 RAVI KANT SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 27.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 02.06.2009 in a case registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that several persons entered into the house and took away articles from the house of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is an error of record in the impugned order that the petitioner was apprehended on the spot, rather the petitioner was arrested on 02.06.2009 in another case which itself reflects that he was not arrested on the spot. Moreover, no recovery has been made from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that though there are other cases against him but none of the case are registered under section 395 of the I.P.C. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Ist Additional - 2 - Sessions Judge, Barh, Patna in connection with S.Tr. No. 1260 of 2009, arising out of Bakhtiyarpur P.S.Case No. 59 of 2009. It is made clear that the learned Additional Sessions Judge will not accept the bail bond of the petitioner if the petitioner is involved in any other 395 I.P.C. Case or cases. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/