1 Cri.Appln.NBo.2631/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2631/2011 1) Rahul Rushinath Jadhav and others. - APPLICANTS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra and another. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for Applicants; Mr.PP More, APP for State. Mr.RS Shinde, Adv. For Respondent No.2. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 27th June, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard. Notice, learned APP waives service for State. Counsel for Respondent no. 2 accepts service of notice as he has already filed affidavit in reply of Respondent no.2. 2) The parties are present, identified by respective Counsels. 3) The controversy leans to settling the dispute between the couple and also the in-laws. Petitioner no.3 is father-in-law of Respondent 2 Cri.Appln.NBo.2631/2011 no.2. 4) Considering the fact that Pooja joined the company of Deelip, Respondent no.2, the prosecution initiated by Deelip against his in- laws and other accused, vide Crime No.I-165/2011 dated 12.5.2011, is quashed and set aside by exercise of powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Criminal Application allowed in terms of prayed clause (B), which reads as under, - “(B) The FIR – Crime No.I-165/2011 registered at Topkhana police station, Ahmednagar (Exh.A) & all consequent proceedings arising therefrom may kindly be quashed.” ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/