B 1-IIGM CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH'.HON'BLE^HRI JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTR1 RIT PETITION fS) N0. 2294 OF 2007 P! 1) Mohan Lal Pradhan, S/o. Shri Laharam Pradhan, agedabout39 yearS, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Nawapara (Amoda), Block Nawagarh, Dist. Janjgir-Champa, CG. 2) Gajraj Singh Kamat, S/&. Shri R.S. Kamal, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Irraf, Bllock - Paii, Dist. Korba, CG. 3) Ramshanker Sharma, S/o. Shri Mahanlal Sharma, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School Singhanpuri, Bazar.Bllock - Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur.CG. 4) Smt. Vidyawati Patel, W/0. ;Shri Ishwari Patel, aged about 38 years, Assistant Teachec, -Govt. Middie School, Gevra, Block - Katghora, Dist. Korba, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Education./Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur,CG. 2) Director Pubiic Instruction, Chhattisgarh Govt, Raipur. 3) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur, GG. 4) District Education Officer, Dist. Bilaspur,CG. 5) District Education Officer, Dist. Janjgir-Champa, CG. 6) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Dist. Korba, CQ. - ^? •.•SSSSSSf-Scsa-r'S. ;:~£B£^S^^^,^:^ ^a-s.-;.^iBiistete''fi %Kes^^^^5'^ PRESENT: Shri Anil Singh Rajpur, counse! for the petitioner. Smt.Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt, Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12thApril 2007) 1. The question of lawinvolved herein as to whether the petitioners are entitied to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as weli asfor the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari& others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7-11-2006.. 3. In view of the above stated submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in thesame terms. No order astocosts. Sd/- Satish K. AgnihQfFi Judge L.. _V*-—.J— vs^^f 'tec