IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15624 of 2008 SUBHASH KUMAR @ SUBHASH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Dr. Amrendra Kumar No. 1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhaya, A.P.P. ----- 9 13.4.2009 It appears that the petitioner had earlier made two attempts at securing bail from this court and both of them were rejected, the last of them being Cr.Misc. No. 10004 of 2007 by order dated 30.3.2007. That record was called for by order dated 19.5.2008. It appears from the records of Cr.Misc. No. 10004 of 2007 that a fraud had been committed in bail petitions bearing Cr.Misc. No. 13722 of 2003 and Cr.Misc. No. 13667 of 2003 respectively filed by co-accused Chandi Lal and Durga inasmuch as they had obtained bail on the basis of forged copy of fardbeyan wherein the names of both accused persons were omitted as assailants and in its place the word “agyat” had been substituted. The petitioner in the instant case has renewed his prayer for bail on this third occasion on the ground that Chandi Lal and Durga the petitioner of Cr.Misc. No. 13722 of 2003 and Cr.Misc. No. 13667 of 2003 have been enlarged on bail by this court and the case of the petitioner is similar situate as that of Chandi Lal and Durga and he is entitled to similar benefits. In view of the categoric findings recorded in order dated 30.3.2007 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 10004 of 2007 where the submission made today had already been considered and rejected and order dated 28.3.2006 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 6914 of 2006, I do not find any - 2 - convincing reason to release the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected, this for the third time. Spd/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)