IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15461 of 2007 VIKASH MARIK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 11.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Assertion of the petitioner is that when the certificate proceeding was initiated against him which was Case No. 123/2006-07 he filed his objection under section 9 of the Act. Response of the Bank on the said objection was sought by the Certificate Officer but the Bank has never appeared before the Certificate Officer or responded in this case. That is the reason why the issue is still pending and in the meanwhile the tractor of the petitioner has also been seized by the Bank through recovery agent. Seizure of tractor by recovery agent is a different cause of action for which no relief can be granted in the present writ application. So far the certificate proceeding is concerned this writ application is disposed with a direction upon the Certificate Officer that if the respondents Bank are not cooperating or responding to the objection petition he shall hear the petitioner and decide the issue. The decision of the objection shall govern the future course of action of the case. This writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)