COCP No. 428 of 2010 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 428 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.8.2010 M/s Mata Laxmi Stone Crushing Co. .....Petitioner Versus Smt. Urvashi Gulati and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Arun Palli, Senior Advocate, with Shri Tushar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Aman Chaudhary, Additional AG, Haryana, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6. Ms. Preeti Khanna, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 5 and 9. Shri H.S. Hooda, Senior Advocate, with Shri J.P. Singh, Advocate, for respondent No. 7. Shri Manoj Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.8. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The direction of this Court was for allotment of suitable alternative plot in view of the fact that the petitioner was to be displaced. It is not disputed that the petitioner has since been offered plot. The dispute is as to at what rate, the plot should be allotted to the petitioner. Since there is dispute regarding the rate of plot, which was not subject matter of controversy in the earlier writ petition, the COCP No. 428 of 2010 (O&M) [2] present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail its alternative remedy, as may be available to the petitioner, in respect of determination of price of plot, in accordance with law. Rule is discharged. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 12.8.2010 ds