^ HIGH COlJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASP PE'nTIONER RE8PQNDENT8 •: 1, WRFr PETITION (0 No. 2081 of2009 Ku^ 8on.al Jaiswal S/o Shri R.PJaiswal, aged abo'at 20 years, Ry/o Quarter No. 1-A, Street- 21, Sector -2 Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Techmcal Uoiversity, Tlifoygl-i its Regis'trar, Bhiiai, District Durg (C.G.) 2. Rungta College of Etigitieermg & Tediiiology through . ite. Prmcipal, Kohka-Kumd Road, Kurud, Bhilai, Disti-ict Durg (C.G.) 490024. 3. All India Counsel for Techmcal Educatioa, Iiidira Gaiidlii Sports Complex, Iiidi'aprastha Estate, New Delhi. WBIT PETIT10N IJNDER .^TICLE 226 OF TIIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Agmiiotri, J. Present: Shri M/P.S-Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner, Slm Y»8»Th<ikur,Advocate for the rospoiident No> 1. Ms. Shamiila Singhai, Advocate forfhe .respondent No, 3, \ ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 09m day of July, 2009) Heard, 1. Leamed counsel appearisig for the respondent No. 1 siibmits that normally, after declaration of the result, the answer.mg sheets are ret.a.ined for a period of six nionths and tfaereafter, tfiie sasBe are disposed of However. as a speci.al oa.se, if the answer sheets of tiie petitioner are a-vailable, tiie same shall be revalued and tbe results would be declared accordiiigly withisi reasonable time, 2, In view of the above submission, accordisig to leamed counsel appearing for the petitio.tier, eothmg siirvives in this 'matter for adjiidication. 3. Consequeatly, the writ petition stands disposed of Aimt. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge