Crl. Revision No. 2155 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 2155 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision:- 16.09.2011 Ram Niwas and another ....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. D.S. Bali, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Avtar Krishan, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hansi, vide judgment dated 02.12.2008 convicted and sentenced accused- petitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 6 months under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 months each under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC. The Appellate Court, vide judgment dated 19.08.2011, confirmed the judgment of conviction and modified the sentence with a direction that they would be released on probation. However, dissatisfied with the said judgment, the accused again have come to contend that the judgment of conviction and sentence is not proper and they deserve clean Crl. Revision No. 2155 of 2011 (O&M) 2 acquittal in the case. Having examined the testimonies of the injured witnesses and the medical evidence, it transpires that the accused caused injuries to two persons namely Dharampal-complainant and his wife Rajbala. Both the injured received two injuries each. They have consistently supported the prosecution version. The medical evidence is consistent with the ocular version. Nothing such was pointed out which could create doubt over the prosecution version, therefore, the defence plea cannot be accepted. As such, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the judgment passed by the first Appellate Court. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition, the same is hereby dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 16.09.2011 JUDGE ajp