IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33197 of 2009 NITU KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, WIFE OF NIRBHAY KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – GHANSHYAMCHAK, POST – MAHESHPUR, P.S. SANHOLA , DISTRICT BHAGALPUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under sections 419, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner has been accused of impersonating in the examination on the alleged ground that the script written by the petitioner did not tally while filling certain forms at the time of counseling. It is further submitted that allegations are based on mere suspicion without having any legal foundation and no foundation in absence of scientific examination of the writing. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 89 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)