IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3955 of 2010 ARDHENDU KUMAR, SON OF LATE LAKHANLAL BAITHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15/02/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 409, 419, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code was added. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was the S.D.O. Incharge, B.S.N.L., Darbhanga, and, therefore, a Government employee and the entire case is based on documents, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 9.12.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 387 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be 2 cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)