IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28962 of 2010 1. Urmila Devi, W/O Sri Bindeshwari Das, resident of village- Bhagipur, P.S. Alamnagar, District- Madhepura. 2. Mamta Devi, W/O Shambhu Das, resident of Village- Mirganj, P.S. Mirganj, District-Purnea............................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR................................Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 09.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 498(A), 406, 323/34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. Since the petitioners’ anticipatory bail application was dismissed on 08.11.2004 vide Cr. Misc. No. 27776 of 2004, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is rejected. However, the learned court below may consider the regular bail application of the petitioners on the ground that the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners was dismissed in the year 2004 but subsequently the husband has been granted anticipatory bail vide 2 Cr. Misc. No. 30244 of 2009 on 24.05.2010 and may try to dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioners on the same day. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)