Mgi/ ‘ Befre the State Adminls‘tr ‘A. m e u Km a. i ghcamw mm d MM abot saw 33 Yxs, . of Term ap , Ig ramm ah51l and D T J. Versus 7 ; Respondentsml. The statei of Maéhya Pradesh, - ‘_ Threugh/secretary, _ ' Department of Plsher1ES, palxmJ? ) . §5adhya Praéesh, - g . :Bxepa1(m.F) K ‘ :3. The Dy D ‘ector of i sues- Tralnmg linte, , ahsll an ‘91stnct‘3 9 5 o @ (, , T é a1 'Wr/(fH’V/V’V‘H 9 uLiL A ’sl HA {it \_. Mm ’kD w Kw H W 03’“ m 2 Witw §€ttm %611‘?mem%¥1 SB Hon’ble Shn Mamndra Mohan ‘ 18 03 2010 Shrl Raja Shanna, counse! for1 Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel Le Learned counsel for the 1 ‘ Government has passed an order on 1 been taken in favour of the petitioner. in this View of the matter, lean that he may be permitted to withdraw to revive, if grievance is not redressec. " Prayer is allowed. :hrivastava, J. he petitioner. iwyer for the .State. aetltioner submits that the ' State 12~02-2009, wherein the decision has led counsel for the petitioner submits rthis petition at this stage with, liberty Petition is accordingly dismiseed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Tumane i “' Isa/.- V Manindfa{MéHa‘n'Siifiya‘stava . Judge V IJT3(VTm '