R. S. A. No. 4036 of 2005 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : R. S. A. No. 4036 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision : May 18, 2011 Harbans Lal .... Appellant Vs. Devender Singh and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rajeshwar Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for respondents no.8 to 10. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : C. M. No. 5677-C of 2011 and C. M. No. 6081-C of 2011 and Main Appeal : Respondents no.8 to 10 have filed C. M. No. 5677-C of 2011 alleging that the appellant and contesting respondent no.9 have effected compromise Annexure A-1 and the appeal be accordingly disposed of as infructuous in view of the compromise. The application is accompanied by affidavit of respondent no.9. R. S. A. No. 4036 of 2005 (O&M) 2 Appellant has also moved C. M. No. 6081-C of 2011 alleging that he has effected compromise Annexure A-1 with contesting respondent no.9 and in view thereof, appellant be permitted to withdraw the instant second appeal. The application is accompanied by affidavit of the appellant. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. It may be mentioned that judgment of the lower appellate court was passed by me as District Judge. Counsel for the parties submit that since parties have effected compromise, the appeal may be disposed of by me. In view of above, both applications i.e. C. M. No. 5677-C of 2011 and C. M. No. 6081-C of 2011 are allowed and main appeal bearing R. S. A. No. 4036 of 2005 is dismissed as withdrawn, in view of compromise effected by the appellant with contesting respondent no.9. May 18, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE