IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-36446 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.12.2011 Ritu and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Ashish Pannu, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is for the issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 and 4 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.5 and 6. The petitioners assert that they are major and as there is no legal impediment, they have got married. They have already moved a representation (Annexure P-5) before respondent No.2, SP, Jhajjar, District Jhajjar, Haryana, for protecting their lives and liberty. Without adverting to the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take an appropriate action on the said representation. Respondent No.2 before taking decision on the representation shall record his satisfaction about the age of the petitioners as well as on the question of validity and legality of the alleged marriage of the petitioners. (Alok Singh) Judge December 02, 2011 R.S.