MC 3554/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. J.U.N.M. Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also he ard Mr. D.P. Chaliha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the O.P. (Review peti tioner). The applicants who initiated a No Confidence move against the Review pet itioner seek impleadment in the present proceeding, as they are vitally interest ed in the present matter. Although impleadment is opposed by Mr. D.P. Chaliha, learned counsel app earing for the Review petitioner, having considered the nature of the dispute an d the position of the applicants, I am of the view that impleadment should be pe rmitted. Accordingly the 7 applicants are permitted to be impleaded as respondent s 8 to 14 in the Review Petition No. 25/2010. Office to make necessary correctio n in the Cause Title. Misc. Case stands allowed accordingly.