15.wp.4363.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4363 OF 2009 Shri Shivaji Bapu Patil. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and 5 others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Tanaji Mahatugade, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P., for respondent Nos.1 to 4. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH, AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATED : 16TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.:­ 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. Learned A.G.P. appearing for the State Government states that the land bearing Gat No.37 at village Talandage is not available for allotment and therefore the respondent proposes to cancel the allotment of land made from that gat number in favour of the petitioner and allot to the petitioner land either from the same village or some 15.wp.4363.09 2 other village according to the entitlement of the petitioner and place him in possession of that land within a period of eight weeks from today. Statement is accepted. It is however directed that in case the allotment of the land made in favour of the petitioner from Gat No.37 of village Talandage is not canceled and the petitioner is not given suitable land according to his entitlement and placed in possession of that land as per the statement noted above, the respondent shall place the petitioner in possession of the land from Gat No.37 of villate Talandage which is alloted to him. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (K.K. TATED,J)