IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13757 of 2009 1. MANDEEP RAM S/O- NIHORA RAM VILL- MEHANDIYA BAZAR, P.O- JAYPUR, P.S- MEHANDIYA , DISTT- ARBAL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES(HIGHER EDUCATON) DEPARTMENT GOVT OF BIHAR , PATNA 2. THE MAGADH UNIVERSITY, THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR BODH- GAYA 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, GAYA 4. THE REGISTRAR MAGADH UNIVERSITY BODH GAYA 5. THE FINANCE OFFICER MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, GAYA 6. THE PRINCIPAL DUDNAGAR COLLEGE DAUDNAGAR, AURANGABAD, THROUGH THE MAGADH UNIVERSITY ----------- 2 22.1.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner, State as well as counsel appearing for Magadh University. Petitioner’s prayer is for a direction to the respondent authorities of Magadh University to make payment of his arrears of salary; other allowances and deferred D.A. with 9 ½% interests on Provident Fund amount till the date of payment. Petitioner was appointed in Daudnagar College, which became constituent unit of Magadh University with effect from September, 1980. Service of the petitioner got absorbed in the University service. Magadh University used to make less payment of salary and allowances to its teaching and non teaching employees, right from 1981-82. Though deduction for contribution in Provident Fund account were being made from the 2 salary of teaching and non teaching employees’ salary but it was not being deposited in the Provident Fund account of the employees. Several writ applications were filed by Employees in the High Court, in which direction was issued to the University for payment of all legal dues of the employees. Petitioner’s case is that, in compliance of High Courts order, the State Government has released fund for payment to the teaching and non teaching employees of the University, but payments have not been made by the University. Petitioner has filed his representation before the respondents for similar relief, but till date his grievances have not been redressed. Only such persons are being paid, who have filed writ applications and in whose case directions have been issued for payment of their legal dues. In this circumstance, petitioner has approached this Court. Counsel appearing for the State and the Magadh University are present and they have not contradicted the submissions made by the petitioner’s counsel. In similar circumstance, in CWJC No. 4898 of 2007 and other analogous cases, a direction had been issued to the respondent University to consider the representation of the petitioners, in respect of their 3 claims and pass appropriate orders in the light of the report of the Auditors submitted in this regard, preferably within a period of three months, from the date of receipt/production of a copy of order. Similar direction is being issued in case of the petitioner and it is being disposed off. Representation of the petitioner be considered in the light of the Auditors’ report and be disposed of with reasoned order. All payment be made to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of disposal of the representation. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar