1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.908 OF 2003. (THE SHRIRAM SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD...VS... ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. H.V.Thakur, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. P. Dande h/f. Mr. R.S. Sunderam, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE, J. DATED : JULY 14, 2010. Mr. H.V. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he along with Mr. V.R. Thakur, appearing in the matter, intimated the petitioner vide R.P.A.D. notice dated 12.12.2009 that they are withdrawing their Vakalatnama from this matter. The learned counsel also filed on record a copy of the registered notice as well as A.D. Card,, which has been received back as 'not claimed', along with Counsel Note. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner have already been given notice to the petitioner withdrawing Vakalatnama, which is received back as 'not claimed' the service on the petitioner is deemed to be complete. In view of above, Advocate Mr. V.R. Thakur and H.V. Thakur are permitted to withdraw their Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the petitioner. 2 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE RR.