IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45273 of 2010 BITTU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. For the offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C., it is submitted that having rifle in possession that was never used by the petitioner. Theft is said ornamental due to land dispute in between the parties. Parties are gotias and there is no recovery in the case. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)