@ / c’WL’V l @ INTI-HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G) WRIT PETITIONNO €2$© /2003 /' Bhau Ram Dharmik, S/o - Shri Beni Ram Dharmik, Aged about 40 year,R/0 Near Bhagat Singh Chowk Dongargarh Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) PETITIONER v/s RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary of Uchha Sikhcha, Takniki Sikhcha,Jansakti Niyejan , Vigyan and Prodyogik Vibhag D.K.S. Building, Raipur‘ 2. Aditional Director Higher Education , Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sarju Kumar Rawat Asst. Gr. 3 Govt. College Pakhangur Distt. Kanker Rajnandgaon(C.G.) /’/ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TI-E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .Qg) @200 ’mm (13W) \mmm ' WW wm ' \éwifdnm 17/1 0/2003 Heard Smt Renu Kochar for the petitioner. Shn Rajesh ey, Govt. Advocate; takes notice on behalf ofthe respondents no l a d 2 P ‘d By this petm n under Amcle 226/227 of the Consutunon the petttwner seek to challenge h1s transfér order dated 6/10/2003 by whlch he has h n transferred &om Dongargarh to District Kanker The petitioner is working as Grade-III in the Nehru College Dongargarh Learned counse for the petitioner submrtted that the petitioner has been transferred ‘thout any admlmstrative extgencres > He further submitted that the etitioner may be allowed to make a representation to respondent no 1 to raise his grievances against his transfer. Having heard t e learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the feets and ircumstances of the case, the request seems to be just, reasonable a d‘fair. The petitioner is allowed to make a representation to respo dent no.1 raising all his grievances within a period of ten days f . no.1will decide the ‘representa period of one month after cor objective manner and with reaso mngs. At this stage, submitted that the petitioner shc this month. The prayer is reasor the transfer order is stayed till tl'. yet been relieved today and in turn the respondent of the petitioner within a further usiden'ng all his grievances with an learned counsel for the petitioner uld not be relieved till the last date of able, therefore, the implementation of Le last date ofthis month, if he has not With the aforesaid observtions, the writ petition stands disposed of GRPRJ—FS/3SO—l2/2000 50,000. W9? r t’ n