cS"vy^ es.i.; BEFOEE _H QN'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No.^G3c\ /2Q11 ^ PETITIONER Sunita Khopragade W/o Shri Dinesh Khopragade, Aged about - 36 years, R/o. Qtr. No. 367,Thacha Bhawan, Pragati Nagar, Post- Kurud, Bhilai, District Durg(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^^ ,.e^ ~\ <y\l- 3^^ ^-'LA^' ..-••" /<. . 1) ~ State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^" ^ /^s^s^ f/ <&" ^ ~'-^''" 2) State Level High Power Caste Verification Committee, Raipur, (Tribal Research and Training Institution), Through - It's Director, University Campus, Raipur Distt. Raipur(C.G.) 3) Director, Directorate of Higher Education, Government Science College Campus, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. ^^1'.;i^w^^^^i^^^^^^^^j^^^^^ rtftS^^^^^^ ^T W lci-fi'* 'cT8H 3H^T sft*^iqh -y=[ •^wwi, sixil'M'Ko, fsldiy^i ^^^^...U£^..z^^,,^^ sn^r Tr3RT ('i^fg^i) TOiiwoftg ail^l SB : IHon'ble Shri Manlndila Mohan Shrivastava. J.l 13.5.2011 Shri Anup Majumdar, Shri N. Naha Rov, |counsel for the petitioner. Pa|iel Lawyer for fhe State, on advance copy. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for| petitioner was appointed a^ S.C. categoiy. In the or4 required to get her caste c^ High Power Caste Scrutiny "the Committee^ withta a thereafter, applied before remained pendtng before th^: of (he petitioner. The Comjm (Annexure P-5) requuing th4; petitioner has submitted declaratioft and informationl submitted by fhe petitionet any decision tUl date. He issued to the petitioner onj tM<<[ci<(ii 'wicff ^f 1^T^ <r^^i< ^ajRnsn^r the petitioner submits tbat fhe . a reserve categoiy candidate under .er of appointnient, petitioner was irti&cate verifled from fhe 8tate Level Committee (heremafter referred to as period of 3 months. The petitioner, Committee, but, the matter has i Committee without fault on fhe part mittee issued a letter on 18.3.2011 ; petitioner to subxnit documents. The her repty (Annexure P-7). Various in prescribed profonna has also been ', but, the Conimittee has not given submits fhat now notice has been 26.4.2011, proposing teniiination of IWTTiT".:"— ^ liailinamix— XI-HC—78 s^y w W\* WI 311^1 WIW Praveen ^ST ^||<<K-|<<, 8iTJ1y<|(i, [c(diyli< NINCtT %MF<»» Wl.200 SfI^I 'T^; (lclf^'itf) wnwsiitt aii^r ^- groutid her services on the submit verification of caste redord The document on Committee is pending. Th^ can dictate the Committeel Gommittee is still seized oft Under these ctrcumsl look into the matter while grant of extension of time. Accordingty, it is into consideration the fa| wherein the petitioner fumished various informaf With fhe aforesaid dispose of. *l<ll<"l<i1-< fllcii if fs^ <pi|t^l< ^affipTan^r that the petitioner has failed to Irom fhe Committee. shows tfaat the enquiry before fhe petitioner does not have control nor to pass orders. Fact remains fhat the e matter. ^ances, respohdent No.3 is required to ^onsidering petitloner's application for dfrtcted hAs fhat respondent No.3 shall take :t that the enqiiiiy is still pending already submitted her reply and lon. observations, fhe petition is fiiiaUy Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge