IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11731 of 2011 RAMESHWAR@ RAMESH KUMAR @ CHHOTAKA MAKHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 27.04.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears from perusal of the impugned order as well as para 2 of the supplementary affidavit that name of this petitioner came in this case in course of investigation but the specific name of the witness, who had disclosed the name of the petitioner in the alleged crime, has not come in para 31 of the case diary. Moreover, having similar allegation some co-accused are enjoying the privilege of bail. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner Rameshwar @ Chhotaka Makhan @ Ramesh Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in Danapur P.S. Case no. 62 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)