Civil Revision No. 7190 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7190 of 2008 Date of decision: 28.04.2009. Sunil Sardana Petitioner Versus Renu Rawal ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Sonal Dutta, Advocate for Mr. V.M.Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent from the record that the learned Trial Court allowed a plea under Order 32 Rule 15 of the C.P.C. without having even examined the respondent herein (and defendant before the learned Trial Court). The grievance of the petitioner was that the impugned order was not valid because the learned Trial Court granted it even without examining the respondent. That order was set aside by a Coordinate Bench ( Rajesh Bindal, J.) vide order dated 17.9.2007 and it was ordered that the learned Trial Court shall dispose of the matter afresh in the light of the observations made by this Court. The learned Trial Court directed the examination of the Civil Revision No. 7190 of 2008 -2- **** respondent by the Board of Psychiatrists to be constituted by the Director, PGIMS, Rohtak. In a separate petition (Civil Revision No.2751 of 2008- Renu Rawal Vs. Sunil Sardana), that order has been varied by this Court and it has been ordered that the defendant would be examined by a Board of Psychiatrists to be constituted by the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi and that the Board shall submit its report to the learned Trial Court within two weeks of the presentation of a copy of the order before the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi. In the light thereof, the petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the matter afresh after receiving the report from the Board of Psychiatrists to be constituted by the Director, AIIMS, New Delhi. April 28, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge