..1.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2756 OF 2008 1. Shri.Anurag Dilip Jain, 2. Shri Dilip Hajarilal Jain, & 3. Mrs.Anju Dilip Jain. ..Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.H,S,Kini Adv. for the Applicants. Ms.A.T.Jhaveri,APP, for the State. .... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 12th August, 2008 DATE : 12th August, 2008 DATE : 12th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are praying for anticipatory bail Complaint No.89 of 2008 pending before the CJM Pashim Medinapur West Bengal under Section 498-A, 406, r/w. 34 of IPC. The applicants are apprehending arrest in respect of non-bailable warrant issued in the said case. 3. As the above said cases pertain to West Bengal, this Court has no jurisdiction to grant the said ..2.. prayer. Hence, I am inclined to reject the same. However, the learned advocate has prayed for a limited relief i.e. the applicants may be protected upto 31st August, 2008 till they approach the concerned Court in West Bengal. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant said prayer. 4. The applicants are granted time upto 31st August, 2008 to approach to the concerned Court. In the meantime, interim protection in respect of arrest is granted to the applicants. In the event of arrest, the applicants to be released on bail of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount. It is made clear that this relief is being granted only for a limited period upto 31st August, 2008. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]