..- ^). C ^ 1 s^ > IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fc) NOJJ'^4 / OF 2008 w- PETITIONER ^ ^^ ^s^ ^y\'c\.^ ,-r^;'<.\,\.:^" ...A'* " ....-"" v\o"- \^ Vs RESPONDENTS c^ ^w^ ^ ^ ^ Kailash Singh, Advocate, son of Shri Lalchand Slngh, aged about 38 years, R/o Village Seedam, P.S. Batouli, Tehsil Sitapur Distrlct Sarguja (CG) l.State of Chhattisgarh, through the Commissioner, C.G. Information Commission, Nirmal Chhaya Bhawan, Meera Datar Road, Shankar Nagar/ Raipur. The Chief Informatlon Commlssioner, office of Chhattisgarh Information Commission, Nirmal Chhaya Bhavan, Meera Datar Road, Shankar Nagr, Raipur (CG). The Publlc Information Officer/ Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat- Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). /4. Gram Panchayat Girhuldih, Janapad Panchayat Sitapur, through its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Girhuldih, Tehsil Sitapur, District Sarguja (CG). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.4981 OF 2008 r] 1\ Petitioner Kailash Singh Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTJCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDtA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate for the petittoner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lav^er for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on 28th day of August, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage oftime, the petttipn has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. ashok Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge