IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2011 / 7TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2030 of 2011(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VIJAYAKUMARAN NAIR @ VIJAYA GOVIND, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDA PILLAI, KAVU MURI MANA VEETTIL, KODUMUDISERRI CHERUTHOTTU VAZHI MURI, KOTTANGAL VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645. 2. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMPETTI POLICE STATION, PERUMPETTI, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 592. 3. SASIDHARAN NAIR, MUNDAKKATTIL, PERUMPETTI P.O.-689 592. 4. MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR, MUNDAKKATTIL, PERUMPETTI P.O., PIN-689 592. 5. RAJESH, KUTTANAPARAMBIL, PALAKKAL, VAIPUR, MALLAPPALLY TALUK-689 588. 6. VINOD, PLAKKUTTATIL, VAIPUR, MALLAPPALLY DISTRICT-689 588. 7. VIJAYAN, PLAKKUTTATHIL, VAIPUR, MALLAPPALLY DISTRICT-689 588. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS ADV. SRI.GIKKU JACOB FOR R-5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 2030 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.45/2010 OF PERUMPETTI POLICE STATION. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE PUSHPAGIRI MEDICAL COLLEGE. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE RECENT REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO 1ST RESPONDENT DT.10.01.2011. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE RECENT REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT DT.10.01.2011. /TRUE COPY/ R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.2030 of 2011 ***************************** Dated this the 27th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The petitioner has come to this Court with this petition seeking issue of directions to respondents 1 and 2 to afford police protection to him against culpable, contumacious, wanton and violent acts of respondents 3 to 7. 2. According to the petitioner, he was an R.S.S activist earlier. He left the organisation. This resulted in animosity towards him for respondents 3 to 7, who are hard core activists of the R.S.S organisation. According to the petitioner, the petitioner apprehends physical violence against him from respondents 3 to 7 on account of such animosity. A crime Ext.P1 has already been registered. The petitioner apprehends recurrence of such crimes. It is, in these circumstances, prayed that appropriate directions may be issued to respondents 1 and 2 to afford police protection to the person and life of the petitioner herein. 3. Respondents 3 to 7 have entered appearance through a counsel. The counsel disputes the allegations raised against W.P(C) No.2030 of 2011 2 respondents 3 to 7. According to respondents 3 to 7, the boot is actually on the other leg. The petitioner is an undesirable element of the locality. Many crimes have been registered against him. He was being proceeded against before the Vanitha Commission also. There are allegations that he is involved in culpable and contumacious acts against women. At any rate, respondents 3 to 7 have no intention to assault or cause any harm to the petitioner. This undertaking of respondents 3 to 7 may be recorded and proceedings may be closed, submits the learned counsel for respondents 3 to 7. 4. The learned Government Pleader after taking instructions from respondents 1 and 2 submits that while it is true that Ext.P1 crime has been registered, respondents 1 and 2 do not now perceive any threat to the person or life of the petitioner. If there be any such genuine complaints, the petitioner can make such complaints before respondent No.1 and/or respondent No.2 and the necessary and needful actions shall be taken against respondents 3 to 7. It is not necessary, in these circumstances, to issue any specific directions to respondents 1 and 2 now, submits the learned Government Pleader. W.P(C) No.2030 of 2011 3 5. We have considered all the relevant circumstances. We take note of the submission on behalf of respondents 3 to 7 and the submission of the learned Government Pleader on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. We do not, in these circumstances, perceive the need for issue of any further directions in this matter. We accept the submissions of the learned Government Pleader. 6. This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with the above observations. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) rtr/