AB 1921/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. AK Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant, who apprehending arrest in connection with Golakganj P.S. Case No.210/2011 registered under Sections 449/376/457/294/506 IPC, is praying for granting pre-arrest bail under the provision of Section 438 of the Code of C riminal Procedure, 1973. The case diary, as called for by this Court, has been produced by the le arned Addl. P.P., Assam, Mr. B.S. Sinha and according to him, the statements mad e in the case diary are relied upon by him, which this Court is presumed to be t he true statements contained therein. It is further revealed from the case diar y that there are sufficient materials to show that the present petitioner has be en involvement for commission of alleged offence in the aforesaid case. In this view of the matter, the privilege of interim bail granted to the accused-petitioner on 01-07-2011 in connection with the aforesaid case do not j ustify this Court to make the interim bail absolute. Accordingly, the interim bail granted by this Court on 01-07-2011 in con nection with the aforesaid case stands rejected. However, the petitioner may approach the learned court below for regular bail. With the above direction, this anticipatory bail application stands disp osed of.