IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14714 of 2010 KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHRI UMESH PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10/05/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering that initially the father of the petitioner had filed a case about the occurrence and even informed the brother of the Informant who was all along present and two months later, the present complaint was instituted against the in-laws alleging that his daughter had been done to death for ends of dowry, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 12.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Awadhesh Kumar, First Class Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 455 of 2009 bearing its U.T. No. 1321 of 2010, subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he - 2 - will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)