( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETN. 1984/2008 Dimpy @ Khushboo Mahesh Shah. -vs- Nimish Kamal Kishore Lakhotiya. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.S. Dewani, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.P. Kotwal, Advocate for respondent. CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 30th JUNE, 2008. Submissions filed by Mr.Dewani on behalf of petitioner are taken on record. The learned counsel for the respondent prayed that 61st birthday of grandfather of his child Palak will be celebrated on 14th July, 2008 from evening 4.30 onwards. The learned counsel, therefore, submitted that the family of the respondent would be extremely happy to have the company of the girl child Palak at least for few hours. The learned counsel for the petitioner ( 2 ) strongly opposed the request on the ground that relationship between the parties is extremely strained and that apart the girl child Palak gets busy from 7.30 morning till 5.00 pm and has to attend school and devote to studies and hence, it will not be possible for her to attend the function. In the alternative Mr. Dewani, learned counsel states that he has no objection if the girl child Palak goes for the function for half an hour alongwith her aunt Miss Priya D/o Mahesh Shah. Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, in my opinion, since the respondent was not granted custody in the Summer Vacation, as observed by this court in its order dated 30th June, 2008. But then the event now is of celebration of 61st birthday of her grandfather at the house of respondent and if the girl child Palak attends the function, it would add to the enjoyment of all the concerned. Hence, the following order. Aunt Miss Priya D/o Mahesh Shah shall carry the girl child Palak to the house of respondent between 7.00 pm to 9.00 pm and thereafter she shall hand over the custody of the girl child Palak to the petitioner. ( 3 ) Since various orders have been passed by this court in this petition and now the parties have liberty to approach Family Court for whatever grievances they have, this petition need not be kept pending. Accordingly, this writ petition is itself finally disposed of. No costs. JUDGE gsk