CFioOL IN THE HIGH COURT VOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIoms; No. “83 /2006 : /Smt. Sandhya Chandrakar, W/o. Manoj Kumar, aged about 35 years, Occupation Government Servant, Govt. H.S.School Koma, District Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through Tribal Welfare Department Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Mahasamund . District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETIION UNDER ARTICLES 226i.” ~_ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioners most respectfully state as under : PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :— As shown in the Cause Title. PETITIONER Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Railaur (C.G.) :2) Commissioner, 3s> C) HIéH CGURT OF CHHATTI5$ARH AT BILAsPUR W. P. (s) No. ?183/ 2006 Pe’fi‘fianer : Sm'f. Sandhya Chandmkar Versus Respondefrfs : Sm're of Chhu'i’i'isgarh and a1’hers SB: Hsn'bk Mr. JuS‘Hce Safish K. AgnEho‘fPi, J Mr. Mahroaj Mam, Advocate for The peti'rioner. r Miss Suni‘m Jain , Pane! hwyer for fhe responden‘rs/S'rufe. O R D E R (Passed on 22“ day of December, 2006) h The fsHowirig order 0f 1412 Cour-I“ is passed by Sn'fish K. Agnihci‘ri, J, 1‘ Learneé mussel uwearmg for fhz pe?i+ioner as we" as learnad Pam! iawyar appearing for The responden'fs/Sfa’fe jcie1+¥y submif Thu? fhe facts of fr'ae przsen'f mse are simihr 1's 'Hm‘f 6f in W. P. No. 1890 of 2003 (Chha??isgarh Shikchak 5mgh (Teachers Associa'i'ion) Vs. Ski's L \ of Chhaftisgavh & others), which was disposed of Vida order dares a” of Aprii, 2905. They furfher submi'f +§m+ 'l'he ques+ion of kw invo§ved is also "Hie some. 2. In View of ihe above shied submissions made ry learned counsei for +he por'i'ies, +his peiifion is disposed of in ierms of Tho order da-red 6H1 o‘f Iiprii, 2605 passed by *his Cour? in W. P. No. 1890 of 2003. No order as “E'o cosis. Sd/— Satish K. Agniimiri i Judge Bubiu