IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-12786 of 2008 Date of decision:15.10.2009. Krishan Lal ...Petitioner Versus Raj Rani and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. H.S.Diwana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Yadwinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.1 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioner and respondent No.1 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement has also been recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and Criminal Complaint No.284-T/11.5.01/9-05 filed by Raj Rani (respondent No.1) under Sections 195, 196, 197,, 415, 418, 463, 464, 465, 466, 468 IPC, pending in the Court of Mrs. Neelam Arora, PCS, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehgarh Sahib and all the consequential proceedings initiated thereunder shall stand quashed on account of compounding. Disposed of accordingly. October 15, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE