IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9790 of 2010 CHANDESHWAR PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 03. 15.07.2010 This case has come at the instance of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence in the order dated 29.06.2010, the address portion is mentioned as P.S. Saharghar instead of P.S. Saharghat. He further submits that similarly in the fourth line of the second paragraph of the order, the word Baungra is mentioned instead of Baingra. Accordingly, let the word “P.S. Saharghar” be read as “P.S. Saharghat” and similarly the word “Baungra” be read as “Baingra”. The order dated 29.06.2010 stands modified to the above extent. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)