L... •z. A Bhupendra Sia.gh Thakiir S/o Shri Bhushan Singh Thakur, Age about 44 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primajy School, Baruka, Block - Gariyabaud, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Heiaaat Kuiaar Sahu S/o Shri Jsmak Rani Sahu, Aged about 35 years, Asstt. Teaclier, Govt. Hr. Sec, School, Basin, Block - Fiugesliwar, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Akadashi Dewaagaa S/o Maya Ram. Dewangaa, Age about 50 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Piim.aiy Scliool, Kodobatar, Block - Gariyabaad, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Imal Siagli Bagtiel S/o. Late Sliri Pancham.va Baghel, Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Balak Ashraai, Ksliamatapur (Chluiiaria.) Block Makdi, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.5 rv 1 State Govt. of Chliattisgarh, TbiQugli: Secretai-s^, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Depai-tment Bastar (C.G.) 3 District Education Officer Raipur (C.G.) 4 Block Education Officer Makdi/ Fmgeshwar/ Gai-iyabaad 5 Joint Director, Treasury-, Account & Pension Raipiir/Bastar (C.G.) under Article 22Sof the Coastitutioa of ladial Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioners. Sliri Aja^Dmvedi, Paael Lavfyer for fhe State ou adyance copy. ^-^ 2 W,P.(S) No. 5390/2007 Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for tlie petitionei-s subiaits fhat the petitioners have passed D.Ed. examination on their own expenses, therefore, they are entifled to receive two advaace iiicrem.ents according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also subiuits tliat ra. iiiaiiy identical inatters, tiie petitions have been altowed ia ternis of ffae order passed iu the case of Yashfuant Xunuir Sh<vadwsis Vs. Municipa! subraits that the case of the peutioners is squarely covered by the said Judgirient. This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he subinits fhat tlie order inay be passed ia. tenns of the said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioiiers such quali&cation. Accordiagly, tiiis writ petition is aUowed ia terms of the order passed in case of Yashivant Kumar Bnaradwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) szibject to verification of tlie facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificates on fheir own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aiid farther whefher fhey have been paid two advaiice increinents or not. The petition stands fiaaBy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sdi- _. '"""s.61"'" vatti