CRM-M No. 7578 of 2011 **** Khemi vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. B.S.Tewatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. Mr. R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 28 dated 19.01.2011, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 380, 285, 452, 506/34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Ballabhgarh City, District Faridabad. Learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Mahinder Pal, has confirmed the fact that even in the latest neurological report it has been mentioned that the injury in question was simple. Learned counsel for the complainant has argued that apart from inflicting injuries, a sum of ` 72,500/- was also looted by the petitioner and his companions. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, has argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated because neither any injury has been attributed to him nor he was present at the spot. However, to show his bona fides he is ready to create a fixed deposit of ` 20,000/- in favour of the Illaqa Magistrate which will be released to the person ultimately found entitled thereto after the conclusion of the legal process. I find it to be a fair request. In the circumstances let the petitioner appear before the investigating officer on 03.06.2011 with a necessary deposit of ` 20,000/- in favour of the Illaqa Magistrate. On receipt of the said deposit the CRM-M No. 7578 of 2011 -2- investigating officer shall release the petitioner on bail to his satisfaction and keep the fixed deposit receipt in safe custody till the conclusion of the legal process, to be dealt with as indicated above. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE May 16, 2011 sunita