IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2158 of 2009 Baij Nath Rai @ Baijnath Yadav & Anr. Versus Raj Banshi Yadav & Ors. ----------- 02. 14.11.2011 Mr.Navin Nikunj, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that by the impugned order, the prayer of amendment has been rejected and as such the impugned order being interlocutory in nature the present revision application is not maintainable. In view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954, he has thus prayed for converting this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The prayer is allowed. The petitioners are granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)