HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (0 No. 210/2009 PETITIONERS RESPONDEWTS ^ Yogendra Nath Tiwari, aged about 45 years, s/o Rajendra Nath Tiwari, R/o Program Inspector, Near Mouvali Bandh, Namnakala, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G). Vs. 1 Shri R. P. Mandal, Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G). 2 B. S. Anant, Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G). 3 A. K. Gadhewal, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja(C.G). CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 10 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petidoner. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for respondents 1 8s 2. ORALORDER (17.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heard. Petitioner Yogendra Nath Tiwari has filed this petition for initiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondents for the alleged disobedience of the order dated 01.03.2006 passed in W.P.No.854/2006. This Court while issuing the rule passed the following interim order on 01.03.2006. "Having considered the . facts and circurastances of the case and material on record, it is directed that the interim. relief as prayed for by the counsel for the petitioner is granted and \ . the petitioner be allowed to continue till further '^ ' orders. \ - ,. Rao Cont. Case CC) No.210/2009 M.W.P.No.665/2006 is accordingly disposed of. Certified copy as per rules." Mr. Paranjpe submits that since the said order was not complied with, therefore, the petitioner had to Ble this contempt petition. A joint reply has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 65 2. A separate repfy on behalf of respondent no.3 has also been filed. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava submits that by order dated 16.09.2009 (Annexure CR-1/1), the post of Programme Inspector was continued and thereafter by order dated 17.09.2009, the petitioner was permitted to condnue on the same post and in this manner, the order dated 01.03.2006 was complied. He submits that the delay has occurred on account of abolidon of the post of Programme Inspector and the time was consumed in obtaining sanction etc., for continuation of one post in the above manner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, when the order has been complied with by the respondents and the delay in compliance of the order has been reasonably explained by them, I do not deem it appropriate to proceed further in the matter. The contempt proceedings, therefore, are dropped at this stage. __-^———^— SunilKumarSinha Judge \ \. :^^s<, : :^ ^^2a£3^£rs^u^Eis.S£a