IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4871 of 2010 VINAY KUMAR SON OF SRI CHOTE MISTRI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 376 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that from the first information report itself, it appears to be a case of consent, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 27.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in Deepnagar P.S.case No.243 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )