^'-^'x1 l^,.^ \'Z>16" UGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPL7R WRIT PE.TmON {Crimmal'i No. 603 of 2009 PETmON'ER ACCUSED pff' SED p Fspni.jnpTijT' r\.l^ii.3i ^tl'^l>'l-/i^ 1 s. : Prakash Agrawal aged 36 yrs, s/'o Sliri Mohan Lal Agi-awal r/'o : Kaiiash Dal MiU, MungeU Road- Maiigala Chouck: Bilaspur CG : The State of Chliattisgarh Tl'u'ough: The Laboui- Iiispector, Offiee ofLabour OfBeer, Bilaspur C.G. WRTT PETmON ('Criminal) No. 660 of2009 : Prakash Agrawal aged 36 VTS, s/o Sliri Mohan Lal Agrawal r/o : Kailash Da! Mill, Mungeli Road, Mangala Chouck: Bilaspur CG VERSUS : The State of CtiiiattisgaTh Tlirougli: Tlie Labour Inspector. Offiee ofLabour Ofticer, Bilaspur C.G. C,E- WRFT PETmON (Griminal) No. 661 of2009 PETmONER : Prakash Agrawal aged 36 yrs, s/o Shri Mohan Lai .4CCUSED Agrawal r/o : Kailash Da! MiSl, Mungeli Road, ;ala Chouck: Bilaspur CG RESPONDENTS : Thc State of CbAattisgarh Tlirough: The Laboiir Iiispector, Office ofLabour Officer, Bilaspur C.G. WMT PETITION (Crimiaal) No. 662 of2009 PETFnONER : Prakash Agrawal aged 36 yrs, s/o Shri Mohan Lal ACCUSED .dLgrawal r/'o : Kailash Dal Mill, MungeU Road, Mangala Chouck: Bilaspur CG VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Tlie State of Chhattisgarh Throu.sh: The Laboiir hispector, Office ofLabour OfBcer, Bilaspur C.G. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227.OT THE CONSTrTLmON hl^-s*i ^<:atish K. A Presem: Shri Anurag Dayal Shi'ivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vmay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent. t-> (Passed on 12th day of Febraar^', 2009) It appears tliat the Coiul below has issued non-bailable warrant for non- aooearance ofthe petitioaer on some occasion. On perosal ofme papers, {{ - <• 4. 5. I do not fmd fhat aay attempt was made to secure presence of the petitibner by issuance ofbailable warrant before issue of non-bailable warrant. The Court must ensure presence by ofher mode before issuin^ non-bailable warrant. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on the next date of hearing i.e. 18.02.2009, the petitioner shall remain present before the Court below and he will cooperate with the trial proceedings, as directed by fhe Magistrate. In view ofthat, the non-bailable warrant dated 22.01.2009 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. Tbe Court below shall be free to take appropriate steps in accordance with law, ifthe petitioner fails to appear on 18.02.2009 and thereafter, fails to cooperate wifh the proceedings. Accordingly, the above petitions stand disposed of. Consequently, pending applications, ifany, stand disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnibotn Judge -6A