- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1428/2009 Vilasrao Dattarao Deshmukh and another. ...Petitioners.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri K.C. Sant, Advocate for petitioners. Shri V.B. Ghatge, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE: 24.08.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioners pray that they be adequately compensated on account of the brutal murder of Vidya. The petitioners seek to enforce some assurances made to the family of the petitioners by the Ministers from time to time. On notice of this petition being issued to the respondents, the respondents have filed their affidavit in reply and in the affidavit in reply at paras 5 and 9 - 2 - at pages 32 and 33 respectively, it is stated thus: “5. I most respectfully say and submit that according to the letter written to Section Officer, Home Department by respondent no.3, the proposal to give an employment to the petitioner has already been submitted, which is under consideration of the Government. Hereto annexed and marked at Exhibit R-3 is the copy of letter dated 30.10.2006. 9. I say and submit that a proposal for rehabilitation or to give job to one member has already been submitted to the Desk Officer, Home Department, which is under consideration of the Government.” Shri K.C. Sant, learned counsel for the petitioners states, on instructions from the petitioners, that in the light of the assurance expressed in the aforesaid paras, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c24809