S.B CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1062/2007 (Rajesh Patak Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date :: 26.09.2007 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Pradeep Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.Vishnu Kachwaha, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order dated 11th July, 2007 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jodhpur. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that while allowing the bail application vide impugned order, it is ordered that three attested sureties may be produced before the Court. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Magistrate has orally directed that he will accept only local sureties. In my opinion, if such an direction is not given in the impugned order, then no question arises for asking local sureties by learned Magistrate orally. However, learned trial court is directed not to insist the petitioner to furnish local sureties. The sureties may be accepted as per impugned order dated 11th July, 2007. With these directions, the criminal revision petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-