CWP No.512 of 2005 alongwith CWP Nos. 469, 529, 530, 531, 532, 630, 631, 632 of 2005. 14.8.2008 Present: Mr. B.C.Negi, counsel for the petitioner (in all the Petitions. Mr. R.M.Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the Respondents. The petitioners in all these nine petitions have challenged the notification dated 26th March, 2004 and the notices issued in pursuance to the said notification and the impugned orders whereby they were directed to pay enhanced license fee for renewal of their Bear Bar licenses. The respondent-State, in para 2 of the preliminary submissions, has stated that one time relaxation was granted to the petitioner(s) and other similarly situate licensees and their licenses were renewed subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to Rs.7500/-. The petitioner(s) had paid this amount and were permitted to run the Bear Bars for the year which is the subject matter of the present writ petitions. Therefore, the petitions have become infrctuous and are disposed of accordingly. ( Deepak Gupta ), J. 14th August, 2008 ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. ™