1 wp 9624.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9624 OF 2011 Meena Begum Shaikh Khalil and others .. Petitioners Versus Mohd. Abdul Salim Mohd Abdul Hakim Quereshi and others .. Respondents Shri P. G. Gunale, Advocate h/f Shri P. G. Rodge, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri N. H. Borade, A. G. P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri Gunale, the learned counsel holding for Shri Rodge, the learned counsel for petitioners. The learned counsel submits that the Deputy Director of Land Records, Aurangabad has dismissed the appeal filed by petitioners U/Sec. 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. 2. If the order impugned is passed by the authority exercising appellate powers U/Sec. 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue 2 wp 9624.11 Code, then revision U/Sec. 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code would be maintainable. In view of that I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail remedy of revision. No costs. 3. The authority before whom the revision would be filed shall consider the time spent in prosecuting the present petition. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11