Singte Beric IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPSUR h(^ CRIMINAL M.P. N0. '-'\0 f / A >> PETITIONER .<\vc?-.>.<':^ .....'<^r' ^.^•;-:^'y:y-'"[ '••••'''''^^y~ (C-G-)- Dinesh Kumar Nayak S/o. Kashi Prasad Nayak, aged about : 23 years, R/o. Village : Kena, Tahsil : Saraipali, District : Mahasamund V-' -...t( >-?^- t' RESPONDENT ^ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Police Station : Saraipali, District : Mahasamund (C.G.). APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482'"OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDURE CODE ^'^. 7^ sn^rwr R^i'* 311^1 sklil* fSV3 \*. Sraveea ^g^ITqi^pT, ^itTFre, (sldl^y WqWTgi^!'?) L-x:...e)..^.i±-..i^ c|!l*lti'l41-< ^FRif 4 fs^S •ll»]ttf]< ^? s'pgil an^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Bfaaindra Mohan^Steivaatova, J, 06.12.2010 Shri P.K. Patel, couiMel SIui Satish Gupta, Govt. for Heard on admission. This petition under fhe petitioner aggrieved by commission of offence iinder has prayed for quashment Secljion 482 of Cr.P.C. has been ffled ly fra^mg of charge agamst hua for all^ed ^ectk>n379 oftheIPC. The petitioner ofc^iarge sheet. Vide order dated 12.1 1.: Class, Saralpali, has fiamed .2pl0, learned Judieial Magistrate First ct|arges against the petitioner. Against fhe order of remedy of SSiog revision before | been ftled without availir^ raised in the petition, in my o] to iavoke jurisdiction uiider dismisded This petition is Uberty to the petitioner to take so advised, against the order oJ the petitioner. Advocate for fhe State/respondent. fi-ajnu^ of charge, fhe petitioner has a fhe Sessions Judge. This petition has remedy. The grounds which are ^iirion, are not so extraordmaxy so as .482oftheCr.P.C. tUat Settion Accordingly, I am not inalined to admit the petitiaa. at the motion stage itself wifh recourse to the remedy ofrevision, if fiaunit^ of charge. ManindraM^Sbrivastava Judge [Trt^ ^fo-4