r^ IN THE HIGH CONRT OB JIlDICATURE AT^ILASI* (C.Cr.) :. /::: . . ;.:::: 1; '.• M.C.C.No. ^^ / 2005 StNGt.B BE APPtICANTS ~?~ 1. l<f^ff^ V%Wr^1 \^6%^" ^ ^yv ^^y 2. ^- '<%^/ ^ NON-APPUCANTS Coal Iiidia LmuAed, Tlirougte Chainnan 10, Netaji SuUhas Road, KOlteata. South Eastem Coalfields Llmited., Through Chairman- Cuni-Maaagmg Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur. VERSUS 3> Sanjay' Kum.ar Mishra, Shri AXMishra .S/o. C/4 2. Dhfilwadili Colony; P.0. Katghora, Dist.-Korba. Djnesh Kumar^ G^ Dhelwadili Golony, P.0. Katghora, Dist. Korba. ABI^eATICWFQRE»TENSIOWOrTIMEGRANTEteF^R DECaTONOfl'HEi^PSUEa@N3^T!:Q]NSjOt^1^^ APK.KSMJ^itaETOnoaBEiteWW :KIJMAR-fl SKR^^:A3?i®inER^S..«ai.^Al i<M[*^ SK •^J^;?;. WWtW^^^S^- sn^rm sf^n r:: 3^ •<ii<im<<, wrflwj<;,'fti:iwilijt 3n^?rq^w_^ /^ li*<ni sniitn ••••"•--••••••••••••ig^200 fere% I^iT ^11<;<I t«lTO<«ftff Contempt Petition Nos <bl<ttcl<fhl *1t*l^l ^f fSS^ <R(^(R ^isri^T^n^r 20/06 & 47/06 and M.C.C. Nos.77/05, 80/06,181/06and 182/06 23^-2006 Shri B.P. Sharma and iShri Alok Bakshi, counsel for the petitioners. Dr.N.K. Shukla. Sr. Afclvocate with Shri Praveen Das, counsel for the respondent/Shashi Kumal', Chairman, Coal India Limited. It is pointed out b\| respondent that M.C.C. Nos.I filed by the respondent for e> They are also listed today. Heard learned counse learned Sr. Counsei appearing for the 77/05, 180/06, 181/06 and 182/06 have been (tension oftime to deeide the representation. for the parties. This common order sh^ll dispose ofContempt Petition Nos.20/06 & 47/06 and M.C.C, Nos.77/05, This Court whiie dispo 3907/2003, 3347/2003 & 377 180/06, 181/06 and 182/06. iing of bunch of Writ Petition Nos. 568/2001, 4/2003 vide common order dated 18-10-2004 directed the rival parties to n(iake the detailed representation to the Coal A~ india Limited. It v/as funhl Limifed. either may hear t| Comminee to consider and d( law v/ithin a period of thre^ representation. tt was also d may evolve its own modalil petitioners submitted the repr sr directed that the Chairman, Coai incia limseif or may . constitute a High Power ^cide the representations in accordance with months from the date of receipis of the irected that the Chairman of the Committee |ies for deciding the representation. The ^sentation to the respondent, which was not (qt^^f^/ I/ 3n^T?>[ Riiti •wi^ti sr>*ii<ft «R(I 7^ •<IMICI<.1, OTfld'IS, Rldltiy 3ii^i Msi<*i •<i*<ni (n*ii<*> ----•-•••••••••-••••• (^ 200 .{^^.............................^^ 3II^T»«IIW(lft(f ~-2.h- combliance decided within the stipulated |(i( M.C.C. bearing No.78/2005 representation. The said M.C.I dated 25/8/2005 and the the representation till 31 Octotfer be decided. Contempt Petition Nos. petitioners against the non-< and M.C.C. Nos. 77/05, 180/0p, ihe respondent for extension of Learned Sr. Counsel app| compliance of the order of th| constituted and the Commit<< 23/8'2005. it is further submit<( orfice and a note was puiup on| also submined that some petil Judicature at Kolkatta wherel restraining the respondents because of obtaining 1 Class it is stated by the iearnec) that now the order has beenl 12/6/2006 and communicated Learned Sr. Counsel appearing) jieriod. Thereafter, the respondent filed for extension of time to decide the ;. was allowed by this Court vide order respo|ident was granted further time to decide Octot|er. 2005. but the representation could not . unconditional apology and st^ted <ni<i[n4li iiinTfftoA<Ri<^;i< ^i3rf^T3T^7T >0/06 and 47/06 have been filed by the of the order passed by this Court i, 181/06 and 182/06 have been filed by ime to decide the representati.on. 'aring for the respondent sybmitted that in |s Court, a High Power Committee v^as •e submitted its recommendation on ;d tnat the matter v/as examincd Dy tne 18/9/2005 bniiging out the anomaiies. it is |ons were pending in the hligh Coun of |n an oraer ot injunction v/as passed |or giving any promotion automaiicaily MMCC. Sr. counsel appeanng for the respondent passed by the Coai india Limited on |to the petitioners on 14/6/2006 or so. for the respondent however tendered an that due to several difficulties the -I'iiain— sC -^ >i3.1E>lhi aBpnf uippmq^ed 'S3SE3 piesejoie QW \\e ui po3e|<]l DUS1S OS!G 91UII p UOISUOPO JO. 90/?8t PUE] 'O 3'1'\ 'p3l!LU!1 GIDU] jeoo eui Aq psssed us^ pueis 90//.t7 PUE 90/OZ'soN uoiiuod }d( idiueiuoo SLji 'sBuipaeoojd ssoy} ui psuo] fo uoisuspo jo^ epELU jeAejd sqi MSIA ui Bu] 3U1 pUG 3SG3 041 ^O ssoueisiunojp pue SIOBI 'sAep g| siqissod se Ajjes se ssAoidLus p3uj83uo| Apeoj|e }ou y 'pessed jepjo sqi p Adoo A|d(( oui oi psiiddns eq Aeiu QQQZIQIZ \- uo luepuo): p Adoo 9L|i }eq} sAejd sjeuoftiied sq} jo^ Buu^edde 31-1 'pousd peie]ndi}s oui UIUIIM. peppsp li^ueh^ite!^ ^i^iy^ |jh9j j^ (Uhih i-y>i.>jhi* j jed se Adoo psiiiuen sq Jopjo SILII 10 Adon •lo DesodsiD 90/1.91. '90/091. '901U 'SON iq seq jspjo sq-) aouis 10 pssodsip LueiuoQ 'AiBuipjoosv 'paddojp eje sBuipeeaojd IUBLU spunojB sq^ uo SLUII d33>i pue pjoooj uo leusieuj 3L)i pejspisuoo BuiAei-) •\. p pousd e u!L|i!wA|qej9^9Jd ) eqi jo qaea oi 'p9]|ddns Ins o^ }uepuodsej sqi •sjeuoiinsd dsej 941 Aq psssed jepjo eq} lasunoo paujee') eg &qi ie saies eqi psiejsiiej eq iou p|nos uoiieiuesejdsj ^-^ .S^j. OOZ 1-H.--...-.--. ttolhUS lUhlh <toKh 1*^1 -/H -s uy»itelhUS l);^lkMb||.^j I* It^llc >^muy '&iiftyxa 'hlAibiix fe£