* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.03.2012 + W.P.(C) No.2280/2001 Shri P.N.Singh & Ors. … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. … Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms.Vriti Anand, Advocate for Advocate for Mr.Aman Vachher & Mr.Ashutosh Dubey For the respondents: Ms.Archana Gaur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ANIL KUMAR, J. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners have instructed the learned counsel to withdraw the writ petition, as the petitioners have been promoted by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents, Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate, on instructions, also states that the petitioners have been promoted. W.P.(C) No.2280/2001 Page 1 of 2 In view of the statements made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. All the pending applications are also disposed of. ANIL KUMAR, J. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. MARCH 15, 2012 Vk W.P.(C) No.2280/2001 Page 2 of 2