IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.56171 OF 2007 BINAY BARDHAN @ KHOKHA YADAV, SON OF LATE SURENDRA NARAYAN MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ITHARI, POLICE STATION GHAILADH, DISTRICT MADHEPURA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********* 3 30/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has filed this application challenging the order dated 14.06.2007 passed in Madhepura (Permanandpur) Police Station Case No. 304 of 2006 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhepura has taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 307, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the supervision note indicates that infact the Pramukh had given information regarding the occurrence to the Officer-in-charge and his mobile has been seized for the purposes of examining whether he had called the police authorities. The petitioner would be well advised to pursue that aspect of the matter at an appropriate stage of the case. As far as the order taking cognizance is concerned, this Court finds no reason to quash the order 2 as there is no illegality in the order impugned dated 14.06.2007. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)