IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35343 of 2008 VISHESHWAR SHADA @ BINDESHWAR SADA & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.9.2008 Heard. The case is under Sections 394 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act and the petitioner is said to have fired a shot and injured Girija Devi so as to attempting to committing robbery. The contention is that the informant and the injured Girija Devi have stated on oath that they had not identified any one on account of the fact that the occurrence took place in dark. The same Girija Devi was injured and hospitalized and she made her statement before the police naming the present petitioner that it was he who had fired the shot and injured her. Could it not be a case of intimidating the witness and tampering the evidence, besides, being the clear case of participation. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )