IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON'BLE MR. ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND NINE WRIT APPEAL Nos.1649, 1719 and 1748 of 2001, 683 and 972 of 2003 and 1678, 1679 and 1680 of 2005 WA.No.1649 of 2001 Between: P. Saratchandra … Appellant And State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & 3 others. … Respondents WA.No.1719 of 2001 Between: The Workmen of State Bank of India, rep., by SBI Staff Association, Hyderabad Branch by its President, P. Venkateswar Rao & another. … Appellants And Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad, Chandralok Complex, Exhibition Grounds Road, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents WA.No.1748 of 2001 Between: D. Guravaiah … Appellant And State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents WA.No.683 of 2003 Between: A. Komeswara Rao … Appellant And State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents WA.No.972 of 2003 Between: K.S.V. Subba Rao … Appellant And The State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents WA.No.1678 of 2005 Between: Sk. Abdulla … Appellant And The State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents WA.No.1679 of 2005 Between: M. Manmadha Rao … Appellant And The State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents WA.No.1680 of 2005 Between: Sri Tanuku Venkata Satyanarayana … Appellant And State Bank of India, rep., by its Chief General Manager, LHO, Hyderabad & another. … Respondents THE HON'BLE MR. ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL Nos.1649, 1719 and 1748 of 2001, 683 and 972 of 2003 and 1678, 1679 and 1680 of 2005 COMMON JUDGMENT:- (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) These appeals were notified for hearing on 20.08.2009. The learned advocate appearing for the appellants was absent and, therefore, in the interests of justice, hearing was adjourned to 27.08.2009 i.e., today. Even today, the learned advocate appearing for the appellants is absent. In the circumstances, these appeals are dismissed for default with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 27.08.2009 ES