1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JUTISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4946 OF 2009 Mr. Sarvasiddhi Krishna Mohan .... Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for the State. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2 The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that he would like to amend the application. He has tendered the draft amendment. 2 3 Perused the draft amendment. Applicant seeks to give particulars of various cases which are likely to be filed against him. Application for amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith during the course of the day. 4. Present applicant was initially arrested in connection with the offence which was registered vide C.R. No.04 of 2007 with Oshiwara Police Station. It is alleged that the applicant purchased the goods from various people. He, however, did not make any payment. 5. The grievance of the applicant is that he is being arrested on complaints filed by various persons at several places in Maharashtra and Karnataka, as a result of which the applicant, even after he was released on bail for the said offence, was immediately arrested by the Police Station where fresh complaint was lodged against him. Counsel for the applicant invited my attention to various orders passed by this Court granting bail to the applicant in those cases. Prosecution has filed an affidavit and the Chart shown in the said affidavit indicates that after the applicant was arrested on 24/1/2007, he 3 has been arrested at least on 24 occasions on various complaints which were registered by the Police Station in Mumbai and Bangalore. Counsel for the applicant, therefore, submits there is a possibility that he may also be arrested on complaints which are likely to be filed by 18 other persons for the alleged non- payment of amount for goods which were delivered to the applicant. Applicant has annexed the list of the said persons who are likely to file their complaints. 6. The only relief claimed by the applicant herein is that if such a complaint is filed, the Senior Officer of the Police Station where the complaint is likely to be filed should inform the applicant atleast seven days in advance so that he can take appropriate steps. 7. Since the applicant has been released on bail by this Court in several such complaints and even, earlier, anticipatory bail was granted in favour of the applicant, it would be appropriate if seven days’ notice is given to the applicant so that he can take appropriate steps for the purpose of seeking appropriate remedy. 8. In the result, application is allowed in terms of 4 prayer clause (cc). 9. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)