^^ HSGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BJLASPUR W.P.(S)NG.1433 of 2008 Petltjoner Versus Respondents 1. 3. Hori La{ Manjhi, S/oGuiam Manjhs, Aged about 38 years, R/o Village Post Kumrail via Champa, Dlstrict Jgnjglr Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattjsgarh. Through Ths Secretary, ScheduJod Caste & SchecSulsd Tribe Dspartmsnt, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) SndustriaS Trianinig instltute Pali. District Korba (C.G.) Joint Director, Tribai Research and Training Institution, Raipur, (State LeveS High Power Casts yerlflcatlon Committee), University Campus, Dlsttt. Raipur (C.G.) WRST PETITOIN UNDER ARTSCLE 228 OF THE CONSTSTUTSON SingSe Bench : Hon'bSe Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrj, J. Shri DeepaR Jain, Advocate forthe petjtioner. Shri U. N. S. Deo. Govt. AcSvocate for the respondente. ORALORDER (Passed on this 4th day of March, 2008) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petjtionsr was seiectecS for appointment on the post of Fitter Training Officer Ciass-jSI, on the basis of scheduied caste certlficate submitted by him. The apptication for scrutinizing the caste of the petjtloner was referred to the caste scrutiny commlttee on 22.2.2007 and no decislon has been taken as yet. in the normal course, it Is not desirable to regulate and monjtor the proceedlngs of the scrutiny committee, as it requires several Fhakur 3. ® procedure to be foliowed. jn accordance with the decislon Jn Kumari Madhuri Patil snd another Vs. AddS. Commr.. Tribai DeveSopment, Thane and others (1997) 5 SCC 437. However. §tIs expected that the caste scrutjny commjttee wjjl do well jn scrutinjzihg the caste of the petitioner, expedjtiousiy. In vlew ofthe foregoing the petition stands djsposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge