IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26845 of 2011 Pankaj Kumar, son of Patel Ji Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 16.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though there is an allegation against the petitioner that he had kidnapped the daughter of the Informant but subsequently the victim gave a statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. that she had married the petitioner out of her own sweet will. No doubt she resiled from the statement, later on, during trial but in the facts of the case, it is possible that the girl did so under pressure of her parents with whom she was living after statement under Section 164 was recorded. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 356 of 2011 arising out of Khaira P.S. Case No. 04 of 2011 subject to the following 2 conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)