THE HONL’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10663 OF 2011 Dated: 19.04.2011 Between : Kanchan Kawar .. Petitioner And 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Its Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, And others. … Respondents THE HONL’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10663 OF 2011 ORDER : The petitioner herein claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of the Plot No.1 situated in Sy.No.274 of Gajularamaram Village, Qutubullahpur Mandal and Municipality, Rangareddy District. It is stated that the plot in her possession form part of layout sanctioned by Gajularamaram Gram Panchayat. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged action of the respondents in proposing to dig a rain water channel through the road earmarked for the plot of the petitioner. It is alleged that for the purpose of the said channel, the respondents were also attempting to encroach upon a portion of the plot of the petitioner highhandedly and without following due process of law. It is pleaded that except the 20’ road earmarked in the sanctioned layout there is no other access to reach the plot of the petitioner. Thus, according to the petitioner, in the event of digging the proposed rain water channel, the plot of the petitioner would be left without any access and she cannot be used for any purpose. It is also contended that the impugned action of the respondents in proceeding with the proposed channel without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to raise objections and without initiating any steps for acquisition of the land is arbitrary and illegal. Though no counter-affidavit is filed, Sri R. Radhakrishna Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent Corporation submitted on instructions that if any representation is made by the petitioner furnishing the details of the plot in her occupation, the same would be enquired into and appropriate action would be taken in accordance with law. Having regard to the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation and keeping in view that the grievance of the petitioner is yet to be enquired into, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondents 3 to 5 furnishing the details of her plot and raising the objections against the works proposed to be taken up by the Corporation. If any such representation is made within two weeks from today, the respondents 3 to 5 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Till such time, the respondents shall not interfere with the plot of the petitioner in any manner whatsoever and shall not proceed with the proposed laying of rain water channel. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI, J Dt. 19.04.2011 Ivd