IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.19889 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 24, 2011 JASJIT SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.13 dated 17.1.2011 under Sections 506, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sector 36, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise dated 2.6.2011 (Annexure P-2). 2 Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the disputes between respondent No.2 and the petitioner have been settled. Respondent No.2 does not want to prosecute the petitioner. 3 Learned counsel for Union Territory, Chandigarh, on the strength of affidavit sworn by Shri B.S. Negi, Deputy Criminal Misc. No.19889 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 Superintendent of Police (South), U.T., Chandigarh, which is already on record, states that the parties have settled the disputes by way of compromise. The said fact has been verified and confirmed. As such, the State would have no objection to the quashing of the FIR. 4 Continuance of proceedings would not serve any purpose in law. The complainant is not ready to prosecute the petitioner. 5 The petition is, accordingly, allowed. 6 FIR No.13 dated 17.1.2011 under Sections 506, 34, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Sector 36, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings, are hereby quashed. August 24, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?