IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2008 / 8TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 736 of 2008(S) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ POURA SAMITHI, KIDANGOOR, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY PAULY MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW, AGED 32 YEARS, CHIRACKAL, KIDANGOOR P.O., (VIA) ANGAMALY. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IDAMALAYAR IRRIGATION PROJECT, ANGAMALY. 3. THURAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THURAVOOR, ANGAMALLY, ERNAKULAM. BY SENI0R GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K. MEERA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 736 OF 2008 S --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th January, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L. DATTU, C.J: Petitioners have approached the third respondent Grama Panchayat by bringing to its notice the problem that may be visited by the public, if the construction of the bridge in question is carried out in the manner suggested by the Executive Engineer. It appears that the suggestion made by the petitioners is accepted by the Grama Panchayat and, thereafter they have reported the matter to the Executive Engineer. 2. It is further stated that the Executive Engineer has not taken any decision in the matter. If that be so, the petitioners would request the Executive Engineer to take an appropriate decision on the suggestion/recommendation made by the Grama Panchayat and if for any reason, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the orders passed by the Executive Engineer, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the higher authority. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk/DK.