@ wlWk, \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s1 No. é{”9 OF 2011 PETITIONERS : 1/ Smt. Rekha Vyas, W/o Dharmendra Vyas, aged about 51 years, R/o Harsiddi Nivas, Vikas Nagar, 27 Khole, Bilaspur (CG). 2. ’/'Ku. Usha MudaJiar, D/o M.L. Mudaliar, aged about 51 years, R/o Azad Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). 3.” Smt. Shajlja Tiwari, W/o ‘ Yogesh Sharma, aged about 52 years, R/o Bharti Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). 4./ Manju Lata Mishra, W/o Shajl Kumat Mishra, aged about 51 years, R/o Ware House Road, Behind District Court, Bilaspur (CG). / . Ku. Vimla Soni, D/o SR. Soni, aged about 49 years, R/o Gond Para, Bilaspur (CG), f, 5/ Smt. Shoba Kulmitra, W/o s. Kulmitra, aged about 59 years, R/o Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur (CG). 7. Smt. Kshma Sharma, W/o Late Shri C.L. Sharma, aged about 48 years, R/o Sarju Bagicha, Bilaspur (CG). 8. Smt. Mukti Ottalwar, W/o Late Shri Anand Ottalwar, ‘age'd about 54 years, R/ o Kududand, Bilaspur (CG). 9. Rajendra Agrawal, S/o M.D. Agrawal, aged about 48 years, i / Vaishali Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). Motilal Bhaskar, S/o Mahat Ram, aged about 51 years, R/o Chandela Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). A11 the petitioners are working as Lecturers in Devkinandan Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS : 1./State of Chhattisgarh, Through , the Secretary, Department of Urban and Administration, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). Development / r 2. Municipal Bilaspur (CG) Commissioner. Corporation, throug its .— \ ’0 ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE f/$ / \ ‘a, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . i a 2 @ h g? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIW W.P.iS}.NO. 68§9f201 1 PETITIONERS Smt. Rekha Vyas 8s Others V€TSu S RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh 85 Another Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL. for the State. Shri Matin Siddiqui, counsel for, resp. N02. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE C INDIA ORDER (21.11.2011; Grievance of the petitioners in the present petition are that though they are entitled for appropriate pay scale on the post of cturer along with all the arrears the same has been denied to them. Counsel for the petitioners submits that their case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court‘in WPI No. 4003/03 in the matter of Smt. Kavita Tiwari Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Anoth and therefore at this stage they may be permitted to Withdraw this petition however directionmay be issued to the respondent No. 2 to decide e pendi representation (Annexure P/2] of the petitioners. Counsel for the respondent N02 submits that let the petitioners make a fresh representation to the respondent N02 and the same would be decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioners are permitted to Withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. In the eventuality of filing fresh detailed representation by the petitioners Within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, it is expected from the respondent No.2 to decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the said representation, With the above observation, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would beat liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance With law. 1 Sd/— E Pritinker Biwaitar r/M‘ Judge AKEE ONSTITUTION OF le er th ng