PIEGH SQUR? GF CHH££TTKS§ARH A? B§LASPUR DNLSEON ENCH CQR’AM: HON’ELE $HR§ RAJEEV GLEPTA, CJ‘ 8; i-SON’BLE SHRI SUNEL KUMAR $ENHA, J. WRET A??E§£. Na. 23% af 2%8 iEzPPELLiW? RameShwar Singh, Sfo Puran Singh, PEWTEGI‘éER aged about 35 years. resident of Thakur paya ward no. 07., Kawardha, District- Kawardha (C.G.) Vemw RE$F§N§3EMT$ 1. State cf Chhgttisgarh Through m Divisionai Forest officer Forest Division— Kawat’dha, District— Kabirdham (C.G.) 2. The Labour Cam, Rajnandgaon, Through — T‘ne presiding Officer, District —— Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WW? AWEQL mmER $ECHQN 2m OF THE CHHATTESGARH HEGH mum (APPEAL 1‘0 mammm; 3EN9H§ AGT, 2995 Pmgem : Shyi Ajit Singh, Ieamed counse! for the appeuan’t. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Teamed Government Advocate for the State! respondents No.1. (12m oeiiggi, 290g; The foliowmg order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Shri Ajit‘Singh, ieamed counsel for the appeiiant, in View of the a‘act that the grounds sought to be inciucied in the memo of appeat by way of amendment (LA. No.0‘iJ2008) were neither pieaded in the writ petition nor advanced before the writ Court, seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeai with the liberty of filing a review petttton. )Ix ; c 2} Permissbn granted. 3} With ihe above liberty, the Wm appeai is wéihdfawn. J V I” Sunil f