IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH L.P.A No. 400 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : April 04, 2010 Hardeep Singh and others ....Appellants Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present : Mr. Gaganeshwar Walia, Advocate for the appellant. M.M. Kumar, J. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the order dated 24.2.2011 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the relief claimed by the appellants is pre- mature. The appellants have been working on the posts of Home Guards on daily wage basis from 21 to 25 years and have claimed regularisation. The learned Single Judge has recorded that there was no policy of the State for regularisation of services of such daily wagers and such like matters were already fixed before a Division Bench of this Court where a prayer for framing of a policy for regularisation has been made. Accordingly, learned Single Judge held that the pending result of the aforesaid adjudication, the writ petition is pre-mature. We have no reason to differ with the aforesaid conclusion of the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the appeal fails and is, hereby, dismissed. ( M. M. KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S.MANN ) April 04, 2010 JUDGE satish