1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.287 of 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7949 of 2009 WITH CAL no. 324/2009 IN LPA 287/2009 Dilip Jhangiani ...Appellant v/s. Ms. Behroz Edulji & ors. ...Respondents Mr. R. Narulla i/b. Anup Dasgupta for the appellant. Mr. Vijay D. Patil for respondent no.1. Mr. V.P.Sawant for respondent no.6. Mr. V.B.naik i/b. Avadhoot Sawant for respondent no.11. Mr. V.P.Malvankar for ‘A’ Panel Advocate for the State. CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED:- December 15, 2009. P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The primary contention raised before us is that no reason whatsoever is recorded for granting interim-relief. The Counsel for the Appellant relies upon the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of M/s. Pipe Arts India 2 Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shri Gangadharan N. Golmare-2008 (6) MhLJ 280. 3. In view of the above stated considered law, the order is set aside and matter is remanded before the Learned Single Judge to the extent of interim- relief on which parties will be entitled to hearing before the Learned Single Judge. List the matter for that purpose on Friday i.e. 18th December, 2009. The Appeal is disposed of. 4. Application does not survive for consideration. Disposed of accordingly. 5. However, in the interest of justice we direct the parties to maintain status- quo as of today till Friday which order will be subject to such orders as the Learned Judge may pass in the facts and circumstances of the case. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J