IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34268 of 2009 1. ALI TABARAK ANSARI, SON OF CHHATTAN ANSARI, FORMER PRAMUKH AZAM NAGAR BLOCK 2. TANWEER ANSARI, SON OF ALI TABARAK ANSARI BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HARPARA, P.S. AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT KATIHAR. ---- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 7.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 420 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 was the former Pramukh during the period 2004-2007. Petitioner no. 2 is the son of petitioner no. 1. The allegation that the petitioners went to the house of the complainant and demanded bribe for a three wheeler Tempo under the MADA scheme seems improbable for the reason that MADA scheme does not have provision for providing a three wheeler Tempo. It is further submitted that money was paid on 28.6.2007 and the complaint has been filed after a delay on 5.10.2008 at the instance of the opposition of the petitioners. It is submitted that the entire allegations are unbelievable and malicious. It is further submitted that the petitioner has not disclosed that how he came to have a sum of Rs. 25,000/- at hand to pay bribe to the petitioner. Be that as it may, petitioners namely Ali Tabarak Ansari and Tanweer Ansari are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in 2 connection with Complaint Case No. 3666 of 2008 on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)