IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. 11413 of 2009 and Crl. Rev. No. 2584 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 9.3.2009 Pardeep Versus State of Haryana Present:- Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Baldev Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Arshwinder Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. M.M.S.BEDI. (J) (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 11413 of 2009 This petition is disposed of with a specific observation that anything considered adverse remarks against the judicial officer in order dated 23.1.2009 will not be treated as adverse comments for the purpose of the carrier of the Judicial Officer as the Judicial Officer has been in service for the last 25 years having a good reputation. Anything observed in the order is merely meant for the adjudication of criminal revision and not to be used adversly against the Judicial Officer in any manner or in any proceeding. Crl. Rev. No. 2584 of 2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press for the main petition as relief has already been granted to the petitioner. Disposed of. March 9, 2009 (M.M.S.Bedi) tripti Judge