CWP No.2827 of 2009, 3303, 3306, 3343, 3346, 3347, 3353, 3377, 3378, 3379, 3380 and 3381 of 2009. 22.10.2009 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cases of the petitioners are now covered by the judgment of this Court dated June 17, 2008 passed in CWP No.319 of 1997 titled Hira Lal versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another and the petitioners’ pay is to be re-fixed in accordance with the said judgment. He has drawn our attention to a letter dated 4th February, 2009, per which Law Department has given the opinion that all the teachers, similarly situated and circumstanced as Hira Lal in CWP No.319 of 1997, are to be given the benefit of pay. He submits that in view of the aforesaid development, petitioners would be making representations to the Director of Education (Elementary), respondent No.2, for fixation of their pay afresh. In view of the above submission, the present writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Petitioners may, if aggrieved by the order that may be passed on their representations, which they proposed to make to respondent No.2, for fixation of their pay, in accordance with the aforesaid decision dated 17th June, 2008, file fresh writ petitions in this Court. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (R.B. Misra), ACJ. (Rajiv Sharma), J. October 22, 2009. (sck)