cvayov‘ BEFORE THE @N‘BLE HIGH CQURT OFJmUDICATURE AT 37 8 8 IN THE MATTER. OF Ll). ACT “LP. NO. {03 ISMT ANITA C RAWKI‘E M'JED 39 YRS DIREC i‘OR RURAL LIFE PRU GRAMME W/O DR G RAWATE RIG MISSIGN COMP UNI) DRTf MAHASAMUND C f: UMYA RANIAN MGHANTI RECTUR, KwRAi LIFE mm wAMME, g MAHASAMUND (LG, pETITmNER; BILASPUg, gag; L APPROPRIATE GO VERNMEMT UNDER IDACT I94”! ‘ , GITANJAIJ NA GAR: DIST-R‘AIPUR LPRESI'DING OFFICER LABO UR COURT, RAIPUR} ANANB NA HA R, RAIFUR, (C. G.) 2. SMT. CHHAYA SINGH W/Q SHRI BAHADUR SINGEL RIO MISSION CQMPfJUND, DI$TI MAEMSxAMUND, 1 STATE OF C G "THROUGH THE $F CR ETZERY DEPT OF LABOUR D K S BHAWAN in E EQAE EAIPHR 4 .DjY. LABOR CQMMISSIONER, REsPONDENTi, ‘ :j i WRIT PET ITIGN HNDER ARTICLF 22 27 FOR ISSQANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CER'I IORARI AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION A3 DEEMED FIT IN THE LIRCUMSTANCFS OF THE CA$E 3 V. p4 Mpummmnwm ’L &.”_W“AWM ‘ x I ” . " 8 i / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR \b" Writ Petition No. 3788 of 2003 &%w \v’?\U\\ Petin‘oners Smt. Anita G. Rawatc 85 another Versus Respondents Plesiding Omcer, Labour Court, Raipur 85 others (Wn't Petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Consiitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for the peh‘tioner. None for the respondents. ‘ /x% 0 R D E R [oral] ( Passed on this 1 1th day of September, 2009) 1. The matter is caHrd for healing. Shri Pradeep Saxena, learned counsel appeared and pleads no instructions. Thus, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. In view of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/u , - . Satish K. Agnihotri '4; Judge