^E3B3la^^; ..f.'":E^' '%. ,flC..^.-Si;i&^XIHC-22 .^'•.''Sas '@ t¥v SII^T^iI K'u* sn^r ?h+iicti •6't^d ^ T3 -i<l'!<l<*l'll, aifll'M'l®,(<«11'M1< _...w.rf.^Q...4J ll KIKrtl ihW<:h'"vc''\"'vy:;'"" ""W '200 < 'I^^T' aii^i ^wiwaf??! W.P.S. Petitioner C.L. about Govei District Paa(pey, S/o Shri SuMuram Paadey, aged years, Posted as Head Master, mm|snt Middle School, Nawagarh, |anjgir Champa (CG) 6|1 mmls Versus Respondeafcs 1, State of Departai^ DKSBhi^ Director/1 Instructiibns 3. District Champa Writ petitioa under Article 226 of ;hhatdsgarh Through the Secretary, 'nt of School Education Maiitralaya, jwau, Raipur (CG) IComiiussioaer, Directorate PubUc i|>ns, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG) |Education Officer, District Jaajgir (CG) the Coaatitution of ladia S.B. Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishrd 11.12.2008 Shri Jitendra Pali, learaed Shri Amrito Das, learaed Grievaace of fhe petitionet Headinaster at Govt. Middle Schc|ol The Principal, Govt. Higher Seco^ to the Memo of District Educatioti proposal for proniotuig the petijtio Annexure P/4 dated lat Februaijy vide order dated 14.8.2008 (Aim|: Principals, however, name of the| said order whereas his juiiiors ctii<iI<yi-41Ti ^iHtrff^ 1^'^ il^l^K ^7 aipgii 3D^i N0.6918/2008 ^J ounsel for fhe petitioners. Lawyer for fhe State. Pitael is that he is presently workmg as c|ol, Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir-Cham.pa. tdaiy School, Nawagarh, in response Officer dated 25.1.2008 had sent a ijtioner on the post of Principal vide |y, 2008. The State of CUiattisgarh sxure P/5) issued proniotion order of petitioner does not find place in the 4ainely R.P. Mishra aad M,K. Gupta, ,^ =a^ ^f^, |XI-HC-22 y/. :s^ sn^i'qn Rt-(i?ti sn^i sft*iic*i ^1(^1 Y. ^g •3ffqi?pi, •^ftwre, f'lcii'yy sn^r xra^ IWCTI Sh*fl<=h"""""""""""""""""""'^ 200 1^^T' sn^iTOnwofCT -^- redrebsal ^y have been given proinotion. representation (Aniiexure P/7) was duly forwarded by fhe Education Officer, Jaujgir-Cham] Public rnstructions, however, th( date. Learaed counsel for the pressing fhis petition at fhis stag) fl-esh representation for respondent No, 1. Shri YS Thakur, leamed case the petitioner files a fresh) ;rievance before the respondent aad decided by fhe respondent weeks froia the date ofreceipt of In view of above subniissioli fhe iastaat petition is disposed] subinit a detailed representati4 redressal of his grievaaces. On same shall be considered aiid de|< own inerits in accordance wifh froia the date of receipt of fhe rep| The petitioner subiuitted his d^ted 2.9.2008 for proinotion, which Prjuacipal as weU as by the District jia, to fhe Coiniaissioner, Directorate same has not been considered tiU ssiolas laliv <i)i^'(i1i tt)Hdf ^ fe^ <Pfl^$r< ^srt^n aii^i petitioner subinits that he is not :, however, he prays for Uberty to iile of his grievaace before the AG for the State subinits that ia representation for redressal of his No. 1, the same shall be considered No.l wifhin a further period of six flie representation. of leamed counsel for fhe parties, of wifh Eberty to fhe petitiouer to ^n before the respondent No.l for |such representation being inade, the ;ided by the respondent No. 1 on its wifhiu a further period of six weeks resentation. 'Dhirendra Mishra Judge [^ ^R^