MP 1 CRA18_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2011 Dhanpal Dadu Kamble ... Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. G. M. Savagave for Applicant. Ms. A. Jhaveri, APP for State. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. WEDNESDAY, JUNE 08, 2011 P. C. : By way of present revision application, the applicant challenges the order dated 29th November 2010 vide which the application for discharge came to be rejected. 2. The applicant has been prosecuted for the offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (“said Act” for short). In the said proceedings, an application for discharge came to be filed on two grounds. Firstly, that the investigation was not done by the police officer as required u/s. 17 of the said Act, and secondly, a copy of the spot panchanama was not supplied to the accused-applicant. 3. Insofar as the first ground is concerned, the learned Trial Court has found that the prosecution has produced a notification empowering the investigation by the Inspector of Police, and as such, the case squarely falls under the proviso to Section 17 of the said Act. Insofar as the second ground is concerned, the said ground would be relevant only after the evidence is adduced in the trial. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J)