IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2010 / 11TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4587 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.846/2010 OF NEYYATINKARA POLICE STATION) CMP.6594/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I,NEYYATINKARA .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 --------------------------------------------- 1. ABHILASH, S/O. SASIDHARAN, KIZHAKKEKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, AYANIARATHALA KOTTOOR COLONY, PERUMPAZHUTHOOR VILLAGE. 2. RAJESH, S/O RAJAN, OF DO-DO- 3. DEEPU, S/O. SOMAN, OF DO- 4. ANU, S/O. MANIAN, OF DO- BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------------------ Bail Application No.4587 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.846 of 2010 of Neyyattinkara Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 & 308 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 27/6/2010. The petitioners were surrendered on 7/7/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely B.A.No.4587/2010 : 2 : influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj