THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13236 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER: By order dated 26.3.2007 passed by the 2nd respondent-Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, the 4th respondent herein was declared as the legal heir of late Eli Satyavathi and, accordingly, the 3rd respondent-mutt was informed to submit necessary proposals to the Commissioner of Endowments for sale of the land of 127 sq. yards in T.S.No.1289/A/A at Devi Chowk, Rajahmundry, to the legal heir of Smt. Eli Satyavathi. Aggrieved by the said order, the writ petitioner, who also claims to be the legal representative of Smt. Eli Satyavathi, and claims title and possession in respect of the premises in question on the basis of a gift deed said to have been executed by Smt. Eli Satyavathi, filed a Revision Petition before the 1st respondent under Section 92 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 along with an Interlocutory Application seeking stay of the order dated 26.3.2007. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 1st respondent failed to consider her Revision Petition and no orders have been passed even on application for stay, but in the meanwhile, respondents 1 to 3 are taking steps to implement the order dated 26.3.2007 by selling the property in question in favour of the 4th respondent. Hence, this writ petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent as well as the learned Government Pleader for Endowments appearing for respondents 1 and 2. Having regard to the fact that the validity of the order of the 2nd respondent dated 26.3.2007 is the subject-matter of the statutory Revision pending before the 1st respondent, I am of the opinion that it would be appropriate to maintain status quo obtaining as on today till appropriate orders are passed by the 1st respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the application for stay filed by the petitioner in the Revision Petition against the order of the 2nd respondent dated 26.3.2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time the order of the 2nd respondent dated 26.3.2007 shall not be given effect to. No costs. ______________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 25th June, 2007. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13236 OF 2007 25th June, 2007. Between: Nekkanti Lakshmi. ..Petitioner. And The Commissioner of Endowments,, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents.