I 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 118/2010 ' MALA VERM A Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Kalia, Advocate I . versus M/S BHARTI TELENET LTD Respondent Through: Ms. Zeba Khan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER % 02.12.2010 Counsel for the respondent states that the respondent, without 1 admitting the averments made in the petition, iS;, agreeable to the i disputes being referred to arbitration in terms ;of the arbitration agreement contained in the lease deed dated 05.02.2003. Considering that there is no dispute with regard to the existence I of the arbitration agreerrient as also the fact that disputes have arisen I between the parties, this petition is allowed. Accordingly, I appoint Mr. AtuI Nigam, Advocate (Mobile No.9810049589) as the sole i arbitrator to adjudicate the claims and counter claims of the parties. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified On instructions, j the parties agree that the arbitration be ;! I I conducted under the rules of the Delhi High Court; Arbitration. They ii i !l have also signed the mennorandum and tenderedithe same in court. ( The same is taken on record. A copy of this order along with the memorandum be sent to the Delhi High Court Arbitration Centre as well as to the learned arbitrator. Petition stands disposed of. „ DECEMBER 02, 2010 sr VIPIN SANGHI, J