IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1962 of 2011 ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ ASHOK CHOUDHARY SON OF LATE LAKSHMAN CHOUDHARY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the informant of the case has been made accused in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 257/10 pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Naugachhia registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that the victim went in the company of this petitioner to locate the oxen, which was stolen away earlier. Though, the F.I.R., was registered on the basis of Fard-beyan of this petitioner. The said fard-beyan suggests that the victim was in the company of this petitioner. Subsequently, the family members, on recovery of the dead body, have stated that there was some money transaction between the petitioner and deceased. On the basis of two circumstantial evidences, the accusation of the 2 petitioner surfaced in the case. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the money transaction was six years prior to the occurrence. Moreover, the investigation is still pending. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that on circumstantial evidence, the petitioner has been made accused. With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed off. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)