IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.110 of 2007 SANJAI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 7.8.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the opposite parties. This Cr. Revision has been filed for setting aside the order dated 27.11.2006 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Buxar in Maintenance Case No. 21(M) of 1995. The only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that actually opposite party no. 2 is not legally wedded wife of the petitioner. She was the wife of his elder brother who is no more. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. On perusal of paragraph 11 of the impugned order it appears that in course of enquiry a large number of witnesses including the priest who had performed the marriage have fully corroborated the fact of marriage. It further appears that opposite party no. 2 has also filed a case under Section 498 A I.P.C. in which the petitioner has been charge-sheeted. Thus, under the facts and circumstances as - 2 - well as the discussion made in the impugned order, I am of the view that no case is made out for interference in the impugned order under the revisional jurisdiction. The quantum of maintenance passed against the petitioner also does not warrant any interference. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)