IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3869 of 2010 1. GANPAT SINGH S/O LATE AMBIKA SINGH R/O VILL.- JALPURA, P.S.- HASPURA, DISTT.- AURANGABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF RURAL WORK DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR SIWAN DISTRICT SIWAN 5. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER null SIWAN, DISTT.- SIWAN 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMME, SIWAN, DISTT.- SIWAN 7. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SIWAN SADAR BLOCK, DISTT.- SIWAN 8. ANIL KUMAR S/O NOT KNOWN THE PETITIONER AT PRESENT POSTED AS JUNIOR ENGINEER IN BLOCK ANDAR, DISTT.- SIWAN ----------- 2. 10.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is a Junior Engineer in the Rural Works Department deputed to discharge works under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme, which is monitored by the District Magistrate. Learned Counsel submitted that while the order of transfer dated 13.2.2010 passed by the District Magistrate states that he is being transferred with the approval of the Executive Engineer by his order dated 26.11.2009, the letter bearing no. 317 mentions the name of Vinay Prasad Singh and Anil Kumar, not of the petitioner. Transfer and posting are normal incidence of service and it is for the government authorities to decide where an employee is tobe posted and his services utilized in what manner. The alleged procedural irregularities in an order of transfer may not necessarily invite interference by the Court unless there be grave allegation of malafides, arbitrariness or violation of statutory rules which does not appear the case presently. Without interfering with the impugned order of transfer, this Court directs that the order dated 13.2.2010 be placed before the Executive Engineer for post facto approval or dissent, as he may consider appropriate in accordance with law, and the representation of the petitioner in that regard filed along with a copy of the present order be disposed within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and or presentation thereof before respondent no. 6. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)