IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 6384 of 2006 Between: N.Laxminrasimha Charyulu S/o Sri Dharmachary, R/o H. No. 13-284/2, yadagiripalli Yadagirigutta, Vangapalli Road, Nalgonda District ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Boggulkunta, Hyderabad 2 Sri Sri Sri Laxmi Narsimha Swamy Devasthanam, Yadagirigutta, Nalgonda District rep by Executive Officer 3 Sri Sri Sri Laxmi Narsimha Swamy Devasthanam, Peddireddy Gudem, Yadagiri Gutta, nalgonda District rep by its Executive Officer, .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly a Writ inthe nature ofMandamus declaring the impugned order No. A2/273/2005 dated 24-03-2006 passed by the Respondent NO.2 as without Jurisdiction, arbitrary and colourable execise of power and set aside the same by directingthe petitioner to continue as Archaka inthe Respondnet nO.2 Temple and pass such other suitable order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.ASHOK ANAND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.6384 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, as of now, for further adjudication and it has become infructuous. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 19.9.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.6384 of 2006 19.9.2008