IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5078 of 2010 ARBIND YADAV son of Jagdish Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 21.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 304-B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been stated that in fact the marriage had taken place more than 12 years ago which has been stated in the earlier complaint filed under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code against the in-laws. During investigation, it transpired that the grouse of the deceased was on account of the fact that the petitioner was earlier married and certain witnesses have stated that the deceased had consumed poison on account of having been frustrated by this fact. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 8.6.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. K. Sinha, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Harnaut (Telmar) P.S. Case No. 72 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner,(ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given - 2 - date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)