1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.307/2010. (Madhukar Bhawsar Vs. The State of Mah. and Anr..) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.VD Sapkal, Adv. For petitioner; Mr.SV Kurundkar, Addl.GP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 26 th November, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) Pursuant to the directions dated 11.10.2010 an amount of Rs.1,25,967/- are deposited by the respondent/Collector in this Court on 14.10.2010, receipt of which is at page 65). The calculations, to which reference is given by the respondent/Collector, are not within the scope of his powers as he was only an Executing Authority in terms of section 25(3) of the Consumer Protection Act. There should not have been any objection even for disbursement of the amount deposited. 3) The petitioner is at liberty to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,25,967/-, deposited in this Court. 2 4) Since the purpose of the contempt petition is achieved, however, the approach of the authorities is apathetic. 5) With these observation, the contempt petition is disposed of. No costs. Respondent discharged. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/