IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.11045 of 2009 Date of Decision.17.11.2011 M/s T.P.A. Builders and Developers, E.S. 44, Civil Lines, Jalandhar through its partner Anil Parkash .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through Secretary, Department of Local Bodies, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. A.R. Takkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission to withdraw the writ petition as having become infructuous. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 17, 2011 Pankaj*