Rst'ni e E-'EMfK :^CT»uH "»; C')'' fera? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. / S-3 /20e^ o/7 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTroNOFINDLA, PETITIONER ^ ^^- ^(?-:-:"<<y- ^•^>' ^i^ ••;'le^c)>-"". <'•'''" A..-'""' ^ffeSPONDENTS 1. ^,c 0 •\J & !..l IU ^R-G' =°^' ^A^ ^^ b 2. Inus Bek, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Sohan Bek, Assistant Teacher, Govemment, Janpad Primary School Komdo, Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER <1 HMH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(5) No. 117 of 2007 Petitjoners : AAonsingh Khande and others Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers W. P.fS) No. 118 of 2007 Petitioners ; Tejrom 090! ond o'thers Versus Respondents . ; State of Chhatti^arh and others W. P.(S) No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanjay Kumar Sinha Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatl'iS9arh ond ono+her W. P(S) No. 126 of 2007 Petitioner : Bhuvneshwar Prasad Prodwn Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond others W. P.fS) No. 127 of 2007 Petitioner : Kulnmjan Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhaf-isgarh and others W. P.fSl No. 128 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh ond onother W. P.fS)No. 129 of 2007 Petitioner : PhitosAkshay AAukut Ti99a Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh ond mother W. P.fS) No. 130 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Prasadi Bha9at Versus Kespondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther W P.fSl No. 131 of 2007 Petitioner : 5090? Sai Versus ftespondents ; 5'tate of ChhattiS9arh and o-thers W. P.(S} No. 133 of 2007 Petitioner : InusBek Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt-iS9arh and ono-ther W. P.(S) No. 134 of 2007 Petitioner ; Baliram Bhogat Vwsus Respondents : State of Chhcrtlisgarh and ono-ther W. P./S) No. 135 of 2007 Petitioner : Avinash Chandro XoJco Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarti and o-thers W. P.(S) No. 136 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashikaki Bhagat Versus fte^wndents : 5ta*e of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther W. P.(S} No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhanduram Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.fS) No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementina Ti9ga Vwsus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.fS) No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Krishna ftam Patel Versus Respondents : State ofChhattisgarh and olhers W. P.fSlNo. 147 of 2007 Petitioner : Laxminarayan Patel Versus Respondents ; State of Chhartis9arh and onother W. P.fS) No. 149 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Maxi Miliyoni Toppo Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh ond another W. P.fS) No- 150 of 2007 Petitioner ; Smt. Rajmani Versus Respondents ; S-tate of ChhatMsgarh and others W. P.(S) No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Chamru ftam Nogdeo Versus Respondents : State of Onhattisyu^ and olhers W. P.fSl No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanesh Ram Pradhan Versus Respondents : Sttrte of Chhatt'isgarh ond ono-ther W. P.(S\ No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotelal Khanna Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond another W. P.(S) No. 165 of 2007 Petitioner : ftamkumar Choudhari Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther And W. P.fS) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner ; Brijmohan Nayok Versus Respondents : Sta-te of Chhatt'is9arh ond onother SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justk»Satish K. Ayuhotri, J Present: Mr. A.N. Bhaktu, Advocate for the petitioner(s). AArs. Anju Ahuju, Oeputy Sovemment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lcn»yer,Ms. Sunita Jain. Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER Passed on this 17th Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well os for the State/respondents jointly aibmit •tiiat -the faets of the present wit petitions are simitar to -that of in W. P. (5) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwwri and others vs. State Sovemment of Chhatl'isgarh & others), which uias ullouud vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the questwn of law involved is also •thesame. 2. In view of the above-statedsubmissions made by leamed counsel for •the parties, these writ petitions ore altowed h terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Cwrt m WJ>. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State fiovemment of Chhattisgarh & o'thers). No order as to costs. SuMwth 3. A copy of this order be ploced on record in other cormected writ petition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge