IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18085 of 2011 Sharda Nand Mehta Versus Manoranjan Mehta & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 15.10.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 11.08.2011 passed by Sub Judge V, Patna City in Title Partition Suit No.216 of 2007 whereby the learned Court below rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 89 Clause „d‟ of the Code of Civil Procedure for referring the matter to the Bihar Legal Services Authority. Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that “where it appears to the Court that there exist elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, the Court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the parties for their observations and after receiving the observations of the parties, the Court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same.” From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that the plaintiff is not agreeable and, therefore, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)