IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9233 of 2010 Md. Manhan Ali, son of Md. Nasuruddin, resident of Samra Nizamat, P.S. Sahebganj, District-Muzaffarpur. …….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 16. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nirbhay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 498 A/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides some other minor offences as also Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is husband of the informant/complainant Rani Begum and he is always ready to keep the informant as his legally wedded wife with all dignity and honour. Mr. Sinha has drawn my attention towards first page of the impugned order passed by the learned Sessions court refusing the prayer for bail made on the behalf of the petitioner to highlight the point that as a mater of fact, learned Sessions court had issued notice to the victim lady and she had appeared before the court below, but she flatly refused to live with the petitioner. It has also been highlighted that as a matter of fact, the petitioner had earlier filed a Matrimonial Suit for restitution of conjugal rights and in retaliation the present case has been filed. 2 Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Md. Manhan Ali, is directed to the released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 43 of 2009. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)