SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100 OF 2011 Nargis G. Topiwala ...Petitioner. v. Rehana Abdul S. Shaikh ...Respondent. Mr. Yogendra M. Kauha i/by Ms Vijaya B. Dhingreja , advs. For the Petitioner. Mr. S.P.Singh i/by Mr.R.R.Sharma, advs. For the Respondents. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JUNE 9, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 It appears that the Small Cause Court had passed an order of injunction in favour of the plaintiff, who is the petitioner before this Court. According to the petitioner, the defendant by making some construction has stopped her entrance and thus, committed breach of the order passed by the Small Cause Court. No order of this Court is involved in the matter. In view of this, the petitioner could approach the trial Court, who had passed the order, to take action under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Civil Procedure Code. As that remedy is available , I am not inclined to entertain the petition. - 2 - 3 Contempt petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Small Cause Court. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)