IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10109 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.08.2010 Sahil Virdi ...Petitioner Versus GNDU, Amritsar etc. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Gursimran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amrit Paul, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. Counsel for the University is justified in saying that the relief claimed in the writ petition is infructuous. The prayer was for permitting the petitioner to give special chance to appear in the examination, which was to commence on 31.07.2010. Since the date has already gone, no effective order now can be passed. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. If the petitioner has deposited fee the same shall be refunded on the application made in this regard. August 03, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE