In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 11618 of 2005 Date of decision: 21.4.2008 Sish Ram and others ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Sanjay Vij Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Palika Monga, AAG, Haryana. **** JUDGMENT M.M.KUMAR, J. This petition is directed against the notifications dated 27.11.2003 and 24.11.2004 issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity 'the Act') (Annexure P-1 and P-3 respectively). Learned State counsel has filed an affidavit of Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Estate, Gurgaon. Along with the affidavit, the details of land in dispute, which is subject matter of notifications under challenge, has also been given in Annexure R-1. According to Annexure R-1, the area comprised in Khasra Nos. 19//8/1 and 13/2 has been found to be vacant and cannot be released from acquisition. The rest of the land has been released CWP No. 11618 of 2005 -2- from acquisition. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any illegality in the acquisition proceedings. The objections filed by the petitioners have been considered and the land belonging to them has been released and only small portion has been acquired, which appears to be necessary for the execution of plan. Accordingly we dispose of the writ petition in terms of the concession given by the State. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) April 21, 2008 JUDGE anita