IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5603 of 2008. Decided on 04.08.2010. _____________________________________________________ Raj Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishav Vidyalaya and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Pramod Negi, Advocate vice Mr. J.P. Upadhya, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made representations for the redressal of his grievances on 07.02.1997 (Annexure-F), 31.05.1997 (Annexure –G), 9.8.1997 (Annexure –H) and 03.10.1997 (Annexure-I). He is seeking enhanced wages on the basis of various instructions issued by the State Government. However, fact of the matter is that the representations made by the petitioner have not been decided till date. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the representations made by the petitioner, as noticed hereinabove by passing speaking orders, within a period of ten weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that in case the petitioner is found entitled to 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. the enhanced salary, the same shall be released to the petitioner with interest @ 6% per annum. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 04, 2010. (bhupender)