THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY W.P.No.1228 of 2011 ORDER When the matter came up for consideration on 23-12-2011, it was noticed that the very prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Since there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner on that day, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J rkk Dated: 27-12-2011