1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2212 OF 2008 Alim Abubakar Chagla. ... Petitioner. Versus Vishwas Nangre-Patil & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. R. G. Merchant for the Petitioner. Mrs. U. V. Kejriwal, APP for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and A. R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2009. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The following reliefs have been claimed in this writ petition : (a) That this Honourable Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to show cause why a case was not registered vide FIR against the accused in the criminal complaint of the Petitioner, being Case No. 0403967/07 pursuant to an order under sec. 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. By the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No. VII, Pune in respect of a cognizable and non-bailable offence disclosed in the said complaint. (b) That this Honourable Court be pleased to direct Respondents to register the complaint of the Petitioner as a Crime Register No. with the office of Respondents vide an FIR pursuant to an order under sec. 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. by the learned Judicial 2 Magistrate, First Class, Court No. VII, Pune for various cognizable and non-bailable offences as disclosed in the complaint of the Petitioner being Case No. 0403967/07. (c) That upon such a case being registered by the office of Respondents, appropriate directions be given by this Honourable Court to cause further investigations in the case to be conducted by the State CID or the CBI and completed within such time bound period as this Honourable Court deems fit and proper.” 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the case was registered being FIR No. M/3 of 2007 and “B” Summary report has already been filed before the Magistrate. If the petitioner has any grievance with regard to investigation, he is at liberty to approach the learned Magistrate concerned with a protest petition. If any such proceedings are filed by the petitioner, that shall be disposed of by the learned Magistrate within a period of two weeks of it being filed. 4. The petitioner is also at liberty to take any pleas that may be available to him in law before the Learned Magistrate. 5. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that we have not decided any issue raised in the writ petition on merits. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (A. R. JOSHI, J.)