1 CRA NO.257/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2011 KAMAR ALIKL SHAH MAHBOB ALI KSHAH AND ANR VERSUS MOHD ABDUL GAFFAR AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.PV Mandlik, Sr.Counsel h/for Mr. Gandhi Amol S. & Afzal Hussain Mr.PR Katneshwarkar, Adv. For Resp.Nos.1 to 13; Mr.SS Bora, Adv. For Resp.No.14; Mr.MBW Khan, Adv. For Resp.no.15 ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) In this Civil Revision Application, arising out of Suit No.33/2010, an application was moved by the revision applicant to examine two witnesses in support of the case, branding necessity of such witnesses. 2) Learned Presiding Officer, Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, Aurangabad, did not yield to such request, however, partly allowed to examine Smt. Zillehumma Bargir as a witness. The reasons/findings assigned by the learned Presiding Officer do not call for any interference. However, the plaintiff 2 CRA NO.257/2011 (revision applicant) desires to get the pedigree on record. He has other ways and means to do so, but not by means of a witness and that too, at a belated stage particularly when the matter is made time bound by this Court. 3) Civil Revision Application dismissed. No costs. 4) Heard Mr.Katneshwarkar. Needless to indicate the Presiding officer is conscious of the time schedule in the matter. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/