- 1 - rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.292 OF 1989 Putalabai B.Pattan ... Appellant (Orig.Accd no.4) vs State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.380 OF 1989 Dhondappa Bhimshankar Pattan & ors .. Appellants (Orig.Accd nos.1 to 3) vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.B.G.Tangsali (Advocate appointed) for Appellant Ms.P.P.Shinde A.P.P.for Respondent Mr.B.G.Tangsali with Ms Suvarna a/w Mr.V.V.Purvant for Appellants in Appeal No.380 of 1989 Cri.Appln No.595/2010 does not survive ... CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ DATE: 4th May,2010 OPERATIVE ORDER - 2 - P.C: For reasons recorded separately in the Judgment, the court passes the following order : In the premises, Criminal Appeal No.380 of 1989 fails and the same is hereby dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence dated 12th April, 1989 passed by the trial court against appellant (accused no.3) stands confirmed in its entirety. Criminal Appeal No.292 of 1989 succeeds partly. The order of conviction and sentence passed against the appellant (accused No.4) for the offences punishable under sections 302,326 and 324 each read with section 34 of IPC is hereby quashed and set aside. The order of conviction passed against her for the offences punishable under section 323 read with section 34 of IPC is hereby confirmed. She is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for the period she has already undergone and in addition she shall pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default thereof to suffer simple imprisonment for one month. - 3 - Undoubtedly, accused no.3 shall be entitled for set off, if any, under section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The professional fees of the Advocate appointed for the appellants is quantified at Rs.4000/-. Criminal Appln. No.595 of 2010 does not survive any further and the same is disposed as such. MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J B.H.MARLAPALLE,J - 4 -