IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2011 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32306 of 2011(K) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ARJUN PRASAD,S/O.PRASAD, AGED 23 YEARS KISHNAKRIPA, BAGAVATHY TEMPLE ROAD, CHERANELLOOR PO, ERNAKULAM KOCHI 682 034. BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI 682 022, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS , COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY KOCHI 682 022. R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHANPILLAI,SC., COCHIN UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 32306/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE HALL TICKET. P2: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER. P3: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. P4: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.30.11.2011. P6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.1.12.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).32306/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 15th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner appeared for the 3rd semester B.Tech supplementary examination held in November, 2011. In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a direction to the University to publish the results before 15.12.2011. 2. However, the learned Standing Counsel for the University, on instructions, submits that the examination held during November, 2011 was completed only on 30th November, 2011, and that about 60000 answer papers are to be valued. It is also stated that valuation can be commenced on 16th January, 2012 and the authorities except to declare the results by the 1st week of April, 2012. 3. As already seen, petitioner wants the results published in the middle of December, 2011. However, since the examination was completed only by 30th November, 2011, and in view of large number of answer papers to be valued by the University, it is W.P.(C).32306/11 2 impractical and unrealistic to issue any such direction. Therefore, I am not inclined to issue any direction as sought for by the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, having regard to the case of the petitioner that in case of inordinate delay, he may lose his chance of employment, as evidenced by Ext.P2, I direct the University to complete the valuation process as expeditiously as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs