XI-HG—78 TST -41<41d'4, y>tli'M<i<<, f®l<rti'yll< ^^.^^.c.cj.../.-?5.3^a...........,n ^1*4^1 ^,^jcb v~"r T f 3TT^T TR^ ('(i^3q^T) 3T1^T ^T'f^tbF 'cT^T ^S^ »)+ii<^ 'PPfTW^f^T 3?T^T Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Jl w.p.rciN<b Petitioners (Petition under Article 2^6 of Constitution of India) Bhagchandani, S/o Shri Hardasmat ihagchandani, Aged about 45 years, |ndha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) -al, S/o Late Shri Pariyal Das, Aged years, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Arjun Da^ Janumal R,/o Telib^r Manohar about 50 Raipur (Cp) Amit Kum^r, 27 years, (CG) Mukesh Hardasmdl about 39 Raipur (C( Vijay Kurrjar 3) S/o Shri Manohar Lal, Aged about |R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Lbl Vs Telibandh^, 6. Lal Chand - 35 ye^ Raipur(C( 7. Mahesh Shobhraj R/o Telibs^dha 8. Girdhari years, R/\ (CG) 9. Anil Kumc aged abc| Raipur, Di| 10. Sunil Kunta^ 46 years, (CG) Respondents obl^fd^l^ TTF^Tf ^ f^st iPai^K ^ 3tRPT 3T?^5T ustice Dhirendra Mishra .1259/2009 [Kumar Bhagchandani, S/o Shri Janumal Bhagchandani, Aged ^ears, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. 3) Choithramani, S/o Shri Relu Ram ChoithrarT|ani, Aged about 38 years, R/o Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Aged about |rs, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. ^) Kumar Chandani, S/o Late Shri ^handanani, aged about - 39 years, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) S/o Shri Tikiyamal, Aged about 43 Teiibandha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur |r Ahuja, S/o Shri Udham Das Ahuja, |ut - 42 years, R/o Telibandha, ^tt. Raipur (CG) SA? Shri Harumal, Aged about- p/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. Raipur 1. State of IChhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Departmetit of Urban Administration & Developm^nt, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.) 2. Raipur IV|unicipal Corporation, Through Its Commissi^ner, Raipur, Dist. RaipurA(CG) =F „. -?'^r--'. ^4^ ^1^i^. XI-HC—78 377^1 "^T f<^i4) ^Tl ^?1^T 9h*1W -?^. T^ ^ii^Kn^ ^tii<ri4l<o, f®l<rtl^^< *II*ICTI (h*ii<sr» "CT^ 200 3Tr^?T TPW (1°<Is<sl<iq) 26.3.2009 Mr. Sunil Otwani, Advocate Mr. Alok Bakshi, Govt. Mr. Sanjay K Agarwal, Advct for the respondent No.2 Heard. Learned counsel for the peti| be disposed of in terms of the ob^ Gourt in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 (J^ Nigam, Raipur) decided on 26.3.; Learned counsel for the res| objection if the instant petitionis dis|j In view of above, the instant order dated 26.3.2009 passed by (Jagdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar P; In viewof above, I.A. No.1 & Certified copy as per rules. <=hi^fd4l'i TnTT^f ^ fs6<l <P»i^$i< ^T^tRpTSTT^T f(|)r the petitioners. Advocjate for respondent No.1. lcate with Mr. K. Shakeel, Advocate ioners submits that this petition may tervations & directions given by this J^gdeo Singh Garcha Vs. Nagar Paljk 20CI9; res|3ondents submits that they have no frosed of in the aforesaid terms. ^etition is disposed of in terms of the fiis Court in W.P. (c) No.1118/2009 |lik Nigam, Raipur). P, also stand disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge •}