WP(C) 9405/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Miss R.Dutta, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.K.Sarma, learne d Standing Counsel, ASEB. This application has been filed claiming payment of Rs. 1,38,287/- as re imbursement of medical bills for treatment of petitioner’s daughter who was suff ering from kidney problems. It is stated that both the kidneys of the petitioner ’s daughter were damaged for which Renate transplantation had to be done and on e kidney was transplated at Karnataka Nephrology and Transplant Institute on 16. 9.94 as per approval of the Under Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Health & Fam ily Welfare (A) Department and Chairman of ASEB. Unfortunately, the petitioner’s daughter expired on 20.9.2002 . After the operation the petitioner had to purch ase life saving drugs for his daughter till she expired. He received an amount o f Rs. 3,76,267/- as medical reimbursement from the respondents- ASEB but he is y et to receive an amount of Rs. 1,38,287/- on account of purchase of life saving drugs for his daughter. In spite of several requests made, the respondent-author ities have not paid the said amount and as such , he has to file this writ petit ion . Mr.H.K.Sarma, learned S.C,ASEB submits that as per office order dated 27.4.98 (Annexure-A to the counter affidavit) , reimbursement of expenses on acc ount of medical treatment could be paid subject to submission of certificates fr om the competent medical authorities. The maximum amount that can be paid is Rs. 1,00000/-only for kidney transplantation but as stated in the counter affidavit an amount of Rs. 3,76,287/- was paid ,which is excess to the maximum limit of Rs, 1,00000/- on humanitarian ground and the ASEB is not in a position to pay f urther amount to the petitioner. There is no denial by the petitioner that the Respondent-ASEB has paid an amount of Rs. 3,76,287/- to him. The petitioner is pursuing this court that the petitioner is entitled to get rei mbursement of the amount spent for life saving drugs. No document has been furni shed by the petitioner to show that the said amount was spent for life saving drugs for his daughter. From Annexue-2 to the affidavit in opposition of the Res pondent-ASEB, it is fund that an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/-was paid to the hospita l by Demand Draft to meet the expenditure for kidney transplantation in hospital at Karnataka which is not denied by the petitioner. If the amount of Rs. 1,50,0 00/- is paid for the operation cost , it may be said that out of Rs. 3,76.287/- , the rest amount of Rs. 2,26,287/-, was paid for the cost in purchasing the me dicines including life saving drugs. During the course of the argument hearing, Miss R.Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer for allowing her some time to submit the suppo rting bills for purchasing life saving drugs. I am not inclined to allow such p rayer at this bleated stage. In my considered view enough financial assistance w as provided to the petitioner for treatment of his daughter. No order can be pas sed for payment of further amount without any of any supporting bills produced a long with the writ petition . If the petitioner has really got some genuine dem and, he may approach the appropriate forum by way of filing Money Suit, if so ad vised. With the above observations and directions this petition stands dismisse d. No cost.