Peiitioners 1) Ujar Sai Bhagat, S/o. Shri Manbodh Ram . Bhagat, Ageabout 57 years, Asstt. Teaoher, Boys Primary SchQoi, Gi'iarglabafhan, BiocR Patthalgaon,, Distt. Jashpur(CG). 2) Anant Ram Sidar, S/o. Shri Manohar Singh, Age about57 years. Asstt. TSacher, PrimarySehool. Surajgarh, BSqck . Paaha'gaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG). 3) Dil Sai PainSora.'S/o. Shri Pahar Sai Painkara, Age abou* 54 years, Asstt. Teacoer, Boys primary Schoo!, Ghargiabathan, Bteck .Patthaigaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG): 4) Chsndrakant Painkara, S/o. Shri Dewan Sai, Age about61 years, U:D.T?., Middle Scl-iooi, - ursSfgisosmsri, biooK h''5nrs'5ig5t0n, yisu:. Jashpur(CG). ' 5) Bihanu Ram Bhagat; S/o. Shri Charan Ram, Age abo'trt 52 years, Asstt, Teacher, Primary' Schooi.TrikLitipra, 1-udeg, B!ock Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (CG). ; , . . 6) Maximillian Xalxo; S/o. Shri Johan Xalco, Age aboutSS yeacs,: Asstt. TeaGher,.Primary Schooi, Sendnbatiar, Btock Patthaigaon, Distt. d'ashpiaF .•-(CG).:'.<:;:'^. •1.: ::•.. 'n, Respondents 1) StateGovt of Chhatti^arh, through Seoretary, Eduoation & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhawah, Raipur(CG : 2) Assistant Commissioner, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (CG). • • ..' • • , ' . ; i: • 3) Block Education ofncer, Block Pattha.lgaon, Distt. Jsshpur(CG), . ' • " 4) Treasury, Account and Pension, Qistt. Jasnipur (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oT India) i i: te Mr. Shri Somkant Venna, eounsel for the petitionsra. Shri Ajay Owivedi, uy. Qovi. Advooate TOF the yiate. jiirjwt" -2- (Passed on 9B* day VVith consent of learned counsel appearing for both the pari:ies, the.matter ,Js 'neard finally. . . . 2) The petitiorierswere appointed on 25-9-1973 as ASsistant Teachers on a fixed pay scale of Rs.100/- for the period of initial tv/o years (Annexure P71). After completion of probation, the peiitioners were .granted reguiar pay scaleof Rs. 189-300/- ' 3) Learned counsei appearing for the petiiioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the factsand question of la'fe involved in the present writ petition are simiiar to that of in VVrit Petition (S) No. 7002 of 2006 (Yoges'nwar Prasad Patanwar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) which was disposed of vide order dated 15-12-2006. Learned counsel further submit that this petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 4) In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the vi/rit peution is disposedof in the same terms i.e.,the petitioners are granted iiberty to make a representation to coosider the petitioners if it stands on the same footings as per order dated 24-8-1992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administraiive Tribunai, Jabalpur, inO.A.No. 2745 of 89 (MadhukantYadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P.^and others) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 3-1- 1994 passed bythe Hon'bie Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.68S2 /93 arid grant reilef accordingiy. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge