WP(C) 549/2008 BEFORE HON’BLR MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. K.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms B. Hazarika , learned Standing Counsel, Water Resource Department. The matter relates to alleged non-payment of Contractor’s bill amounting to Rs.2 ,80,303/- which according to the petitioner, it is entitled to for the contract work, the husband of the petitioner has carried out with the respondents. According to Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, the petiioner has car ried out the contract work as indicated in the writ petition. Ms. Hazarika, lear ned Standing Counsel, on the other had submits that the matter needs examination by the respondents. In view of the above and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, th e writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to examine th e claim of the claim of the petitioner and upon such examination, if is found th at the petitioner is entitled to the aforesaid amount Rs.2,80,303/- for the cont ract work which the petitioner carried out under the respondents, the same shall be disturbed to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be carried out within a period of three months form the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, which the petitioner shall furnish to the respondents along with a copy of the writ petition and its enclosures. The respondents may also verify as to whether the petitioner executed the works in question at all and if so, as per the specification of the work order and t o the satisfaction of the respondents. The respondents may also examine as to whether the claim made by the petitioner is barred by limitation.