IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27299 of 2008 CHINA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that petitioner No.1 China Devi has been arrested during the pendency of this application, as such the application as against him has become infructuous. The same is dismissed. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, she is accused for the offences registered under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against this petitioner for attracting the above offence. The victim girl was later on recovered from the Purnia Police Station. He further submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case since earlier the petitioner No. 1, the daughter of petitioner no.2 has filed a complaint against the officer-in-charge for the alleged offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and therefore, in retaliation of the same at the instance of the police, petitioners have been implicated in this case. Learned A.P.P. on the other hand, submits that on perusal of paragraph -4 of the complaint it would appear that the petitioners were specifically named in the alleged offence. Considering the nature of allegations attributed against this petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.2. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)