^' ^ f^/^ J3> IN THE HON'tBLE HIGH 03URT OF CHHATTISGARH AP BILASPUR PETITIONER :/" ^»P. No» __2^13^_/2005 :^ G<»S, Patil S/o G*L» Pafcil, aged about ^ yeax's^ Subw Inspeofcor (M) Special Branch Police Head Quarter Chhabtxsgarh Ra.ipur (C*G«) VERSUS ^ •^. ^ RSSPONDE.NTS '*'.. "^ ^^. -4 /<A^ '^^^ ^\y 2) The Union of India, Through -* The Secrefcary Ministry of Personal^ Public Grievances and Pension^ Khan Market New Delhi^ The SfcQfce of Chhattisgarh Through- The SecrefcQry Deparfcment of Police and Home.Mantralaya^ Raipur (C^G»), The State of Madhya Pradesh Through- The Secretary, Deparfcment of Home and Police Affairs.Manfcralaya, Bhopal (MP$ The State of Madhya Pradesh Through- The Secretary G*A*D^ State Reorganisafcion Cell Wallabh Bha^an Bhopal (M,sP«r)<, MBI^-±EIlI3'ISNJ2iDE5-ARSlISIiS-J2^2l^i-SiLI5i^-^^^JJ!^I^I5-^ INDIA. 'c^'^^^ t€r * • ^^••'.v^ ^^•' ^ ^' .A5 XI-HC-78 ^n^T^rf^TbF ^T^TI^TsCT^ 3^ ^NW^, ^Tft^Ko, Rlcrtwy ^l^dl sb^lcb ****«***-**^**«**-^j- 200 3i(^i M5icr» ^T HWW <T T^%T <1^^1< ^^srf^TW^T 26.6.2006 5hri M.K. Bhaduri, Acivoc<|ite for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy The petitioner joined th^ presently he is posted as Sub^ Raipur. The case of the peti| State the petitioner moved resident of State of Madhya P\ in State of M.P. and his wife & therefore, his services be ai| Advocate 6enera} for the State of Chhatt-isgarh. By this petition the p^titioner has questioned the attocation order dated 16.9.2002 where^y the petitioner's services has been ailocated to the State of Chha-^isgarh. petjtioner's representation wo|s not considered. The petitioner again made representation (Annexur^ P-6) on the ground of Gas Victims to the Secretary, Reorganization| Pubiic ^rievances and Pensior^ Delhi, but nothing has been hec^rd so far. Learned counsel for th| Department of Police on 27.11.1981 asnd Inspector (M) in Special Brach. PHQ, rioner is that on reorganization of the ^he representation that as he is the [adesh, his childrcn are taking education |:hildren are Bhopa! Gas Tragedy victims, ocated to the State of M.P., but the Ceit, ^ovt. of M.P., BhopaJ <& Secretary, Department, Lok Nayak Bhawan, New 2 petitioner submits that in the given situation the petitioner m^y be ailowed to make a detailed XI-HC-78 3^T ^l^ld^, ^Tn^^Ko, R)diy^< +11*1^1 sn*lict» ******»**«****«***«»* ^T 200 ^l ^5|cb (<ic<^<s«^ST) ^TI^T^T^Jcb <T^T3TT^T$t)*41<t) t-^." ^^ ^w • ?;RTT^K^cf3^T — representation to respondent No consider his representation and p^xss appropriate orders. The prayer made by learn fair and reasonable, therefore, detaiied representation to res| <=bi<iT<n4i^ ^i*4^T?te^'<Ri<^i< ^3:rf^T^TI^T 1 and respondent No.l be directed to sd counsel for the petitioner is just, the petitioner is allowed to make a tondent No.2 aiong with documents regarding Bhopal 5as Tragedy ^ictims within a period of two weeks from today and in turn respond^nt No.2 to send the same with his comments to respondent No*3 wiy-hin a period of two months from the date of receipt of the represent^tion andin turn respondent No.3 shal! examine the case of the petition^r within a period of two months from the date of receipt of repre^entation from respondent No.2 and forward the same to respon<|lent No.l with his comments for consideration of same. Therea|:ter; respondent No.l to decide the representation of the petitioner^ within two months from the date of receipt of the representation a1 by the petitioner in accordance ^ |ter considering the grievances raised ith law. With the directions afore^id/ the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per ruies| L.C. Bhadoo Judge