IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 7TH OCTOBER 2010 / 15TH ASWINA 1932 OP(C).No. 226 of 2010(O) ----------------------- OS.1440/2007 OF MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR .............. PETITIONER : -------------------- SULOCHANA NAIR, D/O.LATE NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, MANTHURUTHIL VADAKKETHIL, MUNDANKAVU DESOM, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. RAJU P. NAIR, S/O.APPUKUTTAN NAIR, 'VISHU KRIPA', TRIKKUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, PIN-680314. 2. ROSA JOSEPH, W/O.LATE JOSEPH, T.C.15/1762 (EL 16/10), NELLIKUNNU DESOM, OLLUKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR-680 005. 3. JELMON, S/O. DO. IN DO. DO. 4. JIJOMON, S/O. DO. IN DO. DO. 5. JELVIMOL, D/O. DO. IN DO. DO. BY THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== O.P(C) No.226 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 07th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Defendant No.1 in O.S. No.1440 of 2007 of the court of learned Munsiff, Thrissur is the petitioner before me. Predecessor- in-interest of respondent No.1 filed the suit for injunction against forcible eviction. Petitioner filed written statement and later, a counter claim (Ext.P3.). Noting that counter claim exceeded pecuniary jurisdiction of the court concerned, Ext.P3 was not pressed, and confining the claim to the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court a separate counter claim (Ext.P5) with Ext.P6, application to receive it was preferred. Exhibit P7 is another application filed by the petitioner to adjust court fee payable on Ext.P5, counter claim in the court fee already paid on Ext.P3, counter claim which was dismissed as not pressed. Exhibit P8 is yet another application filed by petitioner to direct respondent No.1 to deposit the admitted rent arrears. Grievance of petitioner is that without disposing of Exts.P6 to P8, applications the case is posted in the list for trial on 01.12.2010. According to the learned counsel if O.P(C) No.226 of 2010 -: 2 :- Exts.P6 and P7 are allowed it may require additional issues to be framed. Direction sought is for disposal of Exts.P6 to P8, applications before the case is taken up for trial. If Exts.P6 to P8 are yet pending that has to be disposed of before the case is taken up for trial. Hence this Original Petition is disposed of directing the learned Munsiff to dispose of Exts.P6 to P8, applications before the case is taken up for trial. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv