?a & BYN9T?Flcwr!OM K0.3SSWO-2S70ffOQ. WSS- £SSSS^D^SWEDW£ IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) REVIEW PETITION No^3 12010 APPLICANTS/ j^RESPONDENTS r'A? .©3!^5 fW WON APPLICANTS/ PETITIONERS x ^ 4. 5.... State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (CG) The secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Finance, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur The Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur (CG) D.1.G. (Administration) Police Headquarters, Raipur (CG) The Director Treasury, Audit and Accounts Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) VERSUS ^' c'' 6. Prakash Minj, S/o Shri J. Minj Aged about 35 years, Occupation SI(M) Bhupendra Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri Phool Singh Dewangan, Aged about 48 years, Occupation ASI (M) Vinod Cheriyan S/o Shri M.G. Cheriyan, Aged about 40 years, Occupation ASI (M) Rajendra Kumar Netam, S/o Chamruram Netam, Aged about 27 years, Occupation ASI (M) Smt. Mnisha Singh Nayan, W/o Mahendra Singh, Aged about 32 years, Occupation ASI (M) The respondents No. 1 to 5 are workina under the PTS Jaadalpur C.G. C.L. Shrivastava, S/o Shri M.L. Shrivastava, Aged about 47, Occupation Sl (M) posted at M.T. Workshop Jagdalpur C.G. T. Venkat Sai, S/o Shri T. V. Q a, z&. Narsingham, Aged about 36 years, Occupation Subedar (M) M- v^ C_@. Gade, S/o Shri Shankaryya iade, Aged about 48 years, Occupation Sl (M) N. Girdhar, S/o Shri N. K. Row, Aged about 25 years, Occupation ASI(M) The respondents No. 7 to 9 are working under the IG Office, JagdalpurC.G. Padumnath Kashyap, S/o Shri Bhrosaram, Aged about 32 years, Occupation Sl (M) posted at CTJW Collage Kanker C.G. ^PPLICATION FOR^EVIEW / RECALL OF THE ORDER DATEB 07th NAY, 2009 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.(S) N074975/2006, IPRAKASH IVIINJ & OTHERS VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND IOTHERS F'-1— HiGH CQURTOF CHHATTiSGARH AT BlbaiSPUI \£-yii-¥ llii J No. 21 j-^ni I/^AM~T?^ '^LiL;AIN 1 S £3^ €•Q/^^ 1 r^^ ft-3' r\t<il-'U]MUtr<i ir'AMTO PETITIONERS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. i/ERSUS P.R. Kashyap & Others, REViEW PETiTiON No. 22 of 2010 APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLiCANTS PETiTSONERS State of Chhattlsaarh & Others. ;RSUS REVIBA/ PETiTION No. 24 of 2010 L T'5~eQ?^MFkr~h:i~n~* '-(cSr-'UiiUEi'i 1 o NON-APPLICANTS PETITIONERS State of Chhattisaarh & Others. R.S. Thakur & Others. REVIB./V PET!TION No. 25 of 2010 A.PPLiCANTS RESPONDENT; Sate of C PETITiONERS APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS VERSUS Dhirendra Slngh Baghel & REVIEW PETITION No. 26 of 2010 State of Chhattisaarh & Others. \ /£'T~ICti 3Ck PETIT!ONERS REVIBA/PETITi K.K.Pandey & Others. ).27of2010 APPLiCANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLiCANT; State of Chhattisaarh & Others. VERSUS Shitla Shankar Patra & Others. REVIEW PETiTION No. 28 of 2010 APPL1CANTS RESPONDENTS NO.N-APPLiCANTS PETITIONERS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. VERSUS Md. Akhatars in & Others. REVIBA' PETITiON No. 29 of 2010 APPLICANTS r^r~M~TO nESr-UNUti'i i o NON-APPLiCANTS PETiTIONERS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. VERSUS Abdul Nawab an & Others. RESPONDENT; REVIEW PETiTION No.'30of2010 State of Chhattisgarh & Oth.ers. NON-APPLICANTS PETITIONERS VERSUS M.L APPLiCANTS REVIEWPET1TION No.31of2010 State of Chhattisgarh & Others. DENT: NON-APPLICANTS VERSUS Diksha Mashih & PETiTiONERS ;EVIEWPETiTION No.32of2010 APPLiCANTS .SPONDENTS .oruiMUCi'i NON-APPLICANTS VERSUS Pawan Kumar Kurre & PETITiONERS REVIEW PETITION No.33 of 201 O APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLiCANTS PETITiONERS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. VERSUS Santosh Kumar Shrivastava & Others. REVIBA/ PETiTION No. 56 of 2010 APPUCANTS RC.OrUiMUCIt 1 O ,ir>M_; 1-APPLICA.NTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. t/ERSUS Kailash PafeiS Others. PETITiONERS REViEWPETITiON No.57of2010 APPLiCANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS PETITiONERS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. VER; Smt. Bai Bharaav & Others. y PETIT . Ql. APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS PETITIONERS REVi State of Chhattisaarh VERSUS Ramji Dhruw & Ofhers. PETITIQN No.61 of 2010 APPLiCANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS PETITIONERS State of Chhattisgarh i VERSUS Balbir Singh Thakur & REV!EW PETITION No. 62 of 2010 APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLiCANTS PETIT!ONERS State ot' Chhattisgarh & Others. Prakash Kaodi S Others. APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS PETiTIONERS REVIEW PETiTION No. 63 of 2010 State of Chhattisgarh & Others. /ERSUS Prakash Minj Ss Others. AND 'PETITION No.64of2010 State of Chhattisgarh & Others. VERSUS Sanjeev Kumar Shrivas & Others. PETITIONERS APPLiCATiON FOR REVIEW/RECALL OF THE ORDER DATED 07TH MAY, 2009 SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANTS Present: Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy applicants. Shri Prakash Tiwari and the non-applicants. Advocate Genera! for the State/ Shri Anand Pandey, Advocates for (Passed on 23ro day of February, 2011) i ^-: .// 1. The appiicants seek review of the order dated 07.05.2009 passed in VV.P.(S) No. 4563/2006 (Abdul Nawab Khan & Others v. State Chhattssgarh & Others) and other connected matters, on the ground that the respondents (writ petitioners therein) are approaching the Government for fixation of their pay scale. 2. On perusa! of the judgment and order dated 07.05.2009, which is sought to be reviewed, there is no direction for fixation of pay scaie, as the said issue was neither ralsed nor argued at the time of hearing of the writ petition, though a pieading was made in the writ petition. Thus, without pressing the issue as the same was }iven up during the argument, no declsion on the question of fixation of pay was taken and no direction has been issued. The iudament and order dated 07.05.2009 is clear and does not adm'it of any ambiguity and further, not capable of any other exDlanation or meanina. 4. In view of the above, at! the above review petitions are dlsposed of. Sd/- . SatishK.Agnihotn Judge as'nok