1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3678 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.3052 OF 1991 Arun Narayan Patil and others ....Plaintiffs V/s. Smt. Godavari Ganpat Patil and ors ....Defendants and M/s Orient Prathisthan Ltd. .. Respondents. Mr. Mudnaney M.K., for the Plaintiff. Mr. Q. M. Ashfaq for the Respondent. Mr. U. B. Nighot, a/w Mr. Sagar Agarkar for Defendant Nos 1 to 4. Mr. Khatri i/b A. L. N. Khatri, & Co. for defendant No.5. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 30 th NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The Plaintiffs seek the appointment of a Court Receiver for the limited purpose of filing proceedings against the Respondent by terminating the lease in their favour and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiffs and any other party that claims to be the owner of the property is always at liberty to take out proceeding against the Respondent or any other party. Pendency of this suit does not prevent them from doing so. The contention that the other co-owners may not join in the suit is unfounded. Plaintiff can always implead such joint owners as party 2 defendants. 2. The order dated 17th December, 1995, directing the parties to maintain status quo does not prevent parties from adopting such proceeding. Even assuming that it does, the order is modified to that extent. 3. The respondents are ready and willing to deposit the rent in the Court.