IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 984 of 2004 (M/B) Rajendra Gupta S/o Prabhati Lal, R/o 128 Lal Kurti, Roorkee Cantt., District Haridwar. ……….. Petitioner Versus Collector, Haridwar & others. ….…... Respondents Mr. K.S. Verma, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, learned counsel on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. L.K. Tewari, learned counsel on behalf of respondent No. 3. Coram: Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) 1. Heard Mr. K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L.K. Tewari, learned counsel, who accepted notice on behalf of respondent No. 3 and Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, learned Brief Holder, who accepted notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2. 2. Parties agree that the liability found against the petitioner should be paid off in 15 equal installments. They shall be monthly installments. Default in payment of any two installments will render this order nonest and then, the rest of the amount can be recovered by the Bank on the basis of the recovery certificates already issued, which are under challenge in this writ petition. 3. In the aforesaid terms, the writ petition is disposed of. (Irshad Hussan, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 06.10.2004 06.10.2004 G