IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28621 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SHALINI NANDAKUMAR, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.K.NANDAKUMAR, 57/364, MIDHUNAM, MONASTRY ROAD, KARIKKAMURI, KOCHI 11. 2. TANIA STEPHEN, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.P.V.STEPHN, PULLAN HOUSE, CHERUKAD LANE, NETHAJI ROAD, CHERUKD LANE, NETHAJI ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 24. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, M.G. UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. 2. M.G.UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KTTAYM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.MUHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 28165 of 2011(U) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX ------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- EXT.P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DTD. 1710.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DTD. 17.10.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DTD. 17.10.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DTD. 17.10.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28621 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are undergoing B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the examination was declared, they had failed in some papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge