•^'... W THE HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTiaSARH AT BILASPUR € Writ Petiti.on No, PETmONER J-33 >002 fc ThamaSahu, W/o Sfari Kpesh KumarSahu, .^' ,^.V'%5.^''> Af,edabtMit26yeen, ..^"^••^.•lifi- '^ Guruji at E.G5. Center-Siinarkana, -^.••"',\A' ''^•••"^^' ^ilIage-Charria DoU, Tehsil-Lormfc ^"'"^<^ e^ astrict-Baaspur(C&) ' •;• . e^*-<-) • \ - Veretas- 1. State of CM'iattisgarh, TlTi'oughSeastary, I.kq'artment Qf Panchayat, Mantralaya, Siasfai Chowk, Raipur(CG.) Z 0-rief Exacutive Qffice'r, Janpad Pancha3'-at- Lomri, Lom'a, Distt. Bilaspiu'. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OFA WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBmONS: CERTIQRARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION O^! ORDERTODQ_JUSTICEINTHEMATTER. " , il|. HIGH GOURT OF GHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WntPfetittoa No, 1392oif2002 Petitioncr Smt Jhama Sahu Versus Rcspondente . State ofehliatti^arh&aaofher (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Consttotioa ofliidis^ (SB: HonTsle SIui Satish K. Agnihotd J.) <» Shri SaifKhan, Advocate for thc petitioner. Stui P. K. Bhaduri, P&nel Lawyer fer the respoadent No. l. ORDBRtotdl ( Passedon fhis 23rf d%r ofPcbruaxy, 2010 ) 1. 3. Heard. i Leamed coniisel appeariag for-lhe respondent No.l/Slate, oa the basis ofthe avenneats iiiade in. fhe retum dated 27.3.2009, subnuts Qiat Itoe serviccs of ttie petitioner has alre^y becn regularized by order dated 6.9.2005 (Anaexure R/I) and the petitiODierAias been receivmg;regu]ar salary. In view oftIiecffitCTwyacccBGtU^ fiw fhe petitioaer Aofljiag Beaiams in fhis wiit petition for atljudjcatioa. Acconlmgty, thc writ petition is disnusMd as havu^ becomc iufi-uctuous. No order asto coste. Sdf- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thnkur