C.R. No. 3230 of 2006 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3230 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 17, 2009 Gurudwara Shaheed Singh …..Petitioner Vs. Onkar Singh and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Sunil Chadha, Avocate. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) An application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff- petitioner has been partly allowed pertaining to portion CDEFGH and dismissed it in context to portion ABCH. Since both the parties have already led evidence before the trial Court and the main case is listed for final arguments, adjudication of interim injunction application would prejudice the rights of the parties. C.R. No. 3230 of 2006 [2] Taking into consideration the stage of the trial, this petition is disposed of as the matter can be finally decided on the basis of appreciation of evidence and no prejudice will be caused to the parties on account of disposal of this revision petition on the ground of stage of the trial before the trial Court. However, it is made clear that nothing mentioned in the orders passed by the Courts below or by this Court will prejudice the rights of the parties. The trial Court will decide the case on the fair appreciation of the evidence led before it by both the parties. September 17, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE