IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.6254 of 2008 Between: Pithani Krishna ..... Petitioner AND Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad and 6 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.Viswanatham Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Municipal Administration Counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 7: Sri.S.Nageswara Reddy, SC for Municipality. The Court made the following: Order: At the interolocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside resolution No.410, dated 29-02-2008, passed by respondent No.4 and consequential endorsement of respondent No.5 in R.O.C.No.93/2008-G1, dated 01-03- 2008,. At the hearing, Sri V.Viswanatham, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the term, for which the petitioner was elected as Counsellor, has expired. In my opinion, with the expiry of the petitioner’s original term, the issue as to whether acceptance of his resignation as Counsellor is valid or not need not be adjudicated in the Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order, dated 28-03-2008, is vacated and WPMP.Nos.8159, 8850, 9128 of 2008 and 35823 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 23rd June, 2011 lur