Dmt 1 lpast11073-11 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 11073 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3097 OF 2010 Udaysingh Rathod. .... Appellant. vs. The Special Recovery & Sales Officer & Ors. .... Respondents. Mr. A.K. Moily for Applicant. Ms. Usha Tiwari for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 21ST JUNE, 2011. P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to delete Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 as according to him the only party concerned in the matter is respondent no. 3 on whose behalf recovery certificate is issued. The said respondents are accordingly allowed to be deleted from the Letters Patent Appeal. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Dmt 2 lpast11073-11 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties. 3. Learned counsel Ms. Usha Tiwari appears for respondent no. 3. 4. Consent terms have been tendered before us by both the sides. The Appellant Mr. Udaysingh Rathod is present before the Court and he is identified by his Advocate. On behalf of Respondent No. 3, its Society Officer K.K.B. Menon is present before the Court and he is identified by his Advocate. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The award of the Tribunal as well as the order of the learned Single Judge are modified in terms of the consent terms. The parties to abide by the same. The undertaking given in the consent terms is accepted and the appellant to abide by the same. The parties shall act according to the consent terms. 5. The L.P.A. is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)