IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13446 of 2009 VISHAL KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13467 of 2009 RAJWANTI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the applications for anticipatory bail arise out of same P.S.case i.e. Paraiya P.S.Case No. 98 of 2007, have been heard together. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the allegations are leveled only due to petitioner Rajwanti Devi of Cr.Misc.No. 13467 of 2009 being elected as mukhiya of the panchayat of the informant which is set up by defeated mukhiya. It is impossible that the commodities may be lifted in name of Ajay and that also reported much after the crime started to be committed just after election even then both the petitioners being mother and son, are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission. - 2 - Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Paraiya P.S.Case No.98 of 2007, the above named two petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI