IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 132 of 2005 ---------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 06/12/2004 IN IA.2839 & 2840/2004 IN OS.178/2000 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... PETITIONER: PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------ VINODKUMAR, S/O. VISWANATHAN NAIR, RAMAVILASOM, VENNIYOOR, VENGANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENT: RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- REKHA, D/O. INDIRA BAI, SHAJI NIVAS, T.C.NO.19/2823, VATTUVILA ROAD, THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. LEKSHMI, D/O. REKHA, SHAJI NIVAS T.C.NO.19/2823 VATTUVILA ROAD, THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMM. (MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN 1ST RESPONDENT.) ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH FOR R1 & R2 SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON FOR R1 & R2 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== C.M. APPLICATION NO. 959 OF 2005 & MAT APPEAL NO. 132 OF 2005 ============================ DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2009 JUDGMENT Basant,J. When this appeal came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and in these circumstances, the appellant/petitioner does not want to prosecute the petition for condonation of delay and the Mat appeal. 2.The C.M. application and the Mat appeal are in these circumstances dismissed as withdrawn. R. BASANT, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE ks. WPC. 2