IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 4974 of 2009 Between: S.Narayana Naik S/o.Sri.S.Umla Naik as Executive Engineer, HLC Divn., TBP HLC Circle, Anantapur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation & CAD (Ser.II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Engineer-in-Chief (Admn. Wing), Irrigation & CAD Department, Erram Manzil, Hyderabad. 3 E.Keshavulu Reddy PABR Sub-Division No.II, PABR Dam of HLC, Division, Anantapur, resident of Anantapur. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and call for the records relating to and connected with the order of Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad dated 2.3.2009 rendered in O.A.No. 3756 of 2009 and quash or set aside the same with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.NAVEEN RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR W.P.NO.4974 OF 2009 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events that have been taken place the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. ________________ S.ASHOK KUMAR, J. 01.06.2009 kpr