IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13277 of 2011 DHIRAJ KUMAR, SON OF RAM JATAN SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The alleged recovery has not been made from conscious possession of the petitioner and admittedly, the room from which the alleged recovery was made, was in possession of co-accused Ranjeet Kumar. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that petitioner absconded twice from jail custody but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was juvenile at the above stated time and he was unable to understand the pros and cons of escaping from the custody. Moreover, petitioner has voluntarily surrendered before the court below on 29.01.2011 and since then he is languishing in jail custody. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mrs. Ranjula Bharti, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 58 of 2004 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be father of the petitioner. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )