IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12632 of 2007 Between: 1 Swamy Vivenkananda Educational Society, Hanuman Temple Road,Khammam, Khammam Dist Rep.by its Joint Secretary, G.Krishna Mohan S/o.Prabhakar, Bus No.AP 03 V 1222. 2 Rachana Educational Society, Antharvani Vidya Niketan, Reddypalli, Khammam Rural,Khammam Dist rep.by its Director,Pavan Kumar S/o.Narasimha Swamy, Bus No.AP 20 W 1153. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Transport Commissioner, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Transport Commissioner, Khammam,Khammam Dist. 3 The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat Bulidings,Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo No.15591/R1/2006, dt.20.2.2007 and 29-3-2007 issued by the 1st respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner institutions to ply the business aged more than 15 years The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support there of and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and of G.P for Transport on behalf of the Respondents. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIG ORDER “The learned Government Pleader for Transport submits that the Commissioner of Transport has already instructed all the subordinates not to seize any vehicles on the ground that they are more than 15 years old. A general order is said to be in the process. Hence, there shall be interim direction to the respondents not to seize the vehicle of the petitioner on the ground that it is 15 years old. Post on 22.6.2007 ‘for judgment’ in Motion List. ” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ..2…. To 1 The Transport Commissioner, Hyderabad. ( BY SPECIAL MESSENGER ) 2 The Deputy Transport Commissioner, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 The Secretary, State of Andhra pradesh, Transport Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ( BY SPECIAL MESSENGER ) 4. One CC to Sri T.D. Phani Kumar, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CCs to the G.P for Transport, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 6. One spare copy. RV RV Dated 20.6.2007 HIGH COURT LNRJ Dated 19.6.2007 Note: Post on 22.6.2007 ‘for judgment’ In Motion List. ’ ORDER W.P.NO. 12632 of 2007 Interim direction RV Dated 20.6.2007 HIGH COURT LNRJ Dated 19.6.2007 Note: Post on 22.6.2007 ‘for judgment’ In Motion List. ’ ORDER W.P.No. 12632 of 2007 Interim direction