THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3230 OF 2008 ORDER: Though it is represented that the petitioner died, having regard to the fact that steps have already been taken in the Court below to bring the legal representatives on record, the matter is taken up for disposal. The petitioner filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 06.02.2008 in I.A.No.549 of 2007 in O.S.No.359 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, in rejecting the I.A. filed under Order I Rule 10 read with Order VI Rule 17 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to implead respondents 6 and 7 as defendants in the suit. In the suit, the petitioner-plaintiff sought declaration that the petitioner is the wedded wife of the deceased Salivendram Kamalakara Rao and so, she is entitled to family pension and other benefits from the office of defendants 2 to 4. Thereafter, the present application has been filed to implead respondents 6 and 7 as defendants in the main suit. It was alleged that there was no marriage between the petitioner and the deceased and the petitioner is a kept- mistress. Hence, they are necessary to be impleaded and consequently, seeks amendment by adding certain allegations in para- 10. The Court below, however, dismissed the said application. Hence, the revision. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that in cases of this nature, where the very right itself is in dispute and a declaration is sought, necessarily, steps have to betaken to get the said relief. In view of the same, the Court below ought not to have dismissed the said application. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 06.02.2008 in I.A.No.549 of 2007 is set aside. Consequently, I.A.No.549 of 2007 is also allowed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 16th July 2010 RRB