IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 2190 of 2008(S) ---------------------------------- CRIME NO. 140/2008 of THANUR POLICE STATION .......................... PETITIONERS: ----------------- 1. SAIDALAVI, S/O.MUHAMMED ALI ALIKKAKKANTE PURAKKAL, THANUR TOWN, THANUR. 2. SALI, S/O.HAMSA KOYA, THELATH HOUSE EDAKADAPPURAM, THANUR. 3. FAISAL, S/O.HAMSA, KUPPANTE PURAKKAL EDAKADAPPURAM, THANUR. 4. SHAHUL HAMEED, S/O.HAMSA KUPPANTE PURAKKAL, EDAKADAPPURAM, THANUR. 5. JALEEL MASTER, S/O.HAMSA KUPPANTE PURAKKAL, EDAKADAPPURAM, THANUR. 6. MALIAKKAL CHERIYA BAWA, S/O.SAIDALAVI OLAPEEDIKA, THANUR. 7. OONATHIL SIDHIQUE, S/O.ALI OLIPPEEDIKA, PARIYAPURAM P.O. 8. ALIMON, S/O.HAMSA KATHIYANTE PURAKKAL, OTTUMPURAM, THANUR. 9. KOYAMADATHU LATHEEF, S/O.ABDUL KHADER OTTUPURAM, THANUR. 10. KOYAMADATHU MUHAMMADALI S/O.KUNHIMUHAMMED, OTTUPURAM, THANUR. 11. KALATTU HANEEFA, S/O.ABDUL KHADER PANDARAKADAPPURAM, THANUR. B.A. NO. 2190/2008 : 2: 12. ISMAIL, S/O.HAMSA KUTTIKADAN VEETTIL, OTTUMPURAM, THANUR. 13. KOYASSANTE PURAKKAL NILFAR S/O.KOYASSAN, THANUR BY ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL SRI.N.K.POULOSEKUTTY RESPONDENTS: ------------- STATE OF KERALA (REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THANUR POLICE STATION - CRIME NO.140/2008 OF THANUR POLICE STATION) REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI. P. RAVINDRA BABU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== B.A. No. 2190 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2008. ORDER Petitioners 13 in number seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Thanur police are at their heels in connection with Crime No. 140 of 2008 registered for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 188, 288, 332 and 427 r/w Section 149 IPC and Section 3(1) of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 2. As per interim order dated 09.04.2008 the petitioners were directed to make themselves available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer on 16.04.2008. This Court also recorded the undertaking given by the Public Prosecutor that till the next posting the petitioners will not be arrested. 3. I am told that the petitioners have been interrogated by the Investigating Officer pursuant to the orders of this Court. Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the petitioners have not been arrayed as accused so far. If so, the apprehension of arrest and harassment entertained by the B.A. No. 2190/2008 : 2: petitioners is not well founded. In case the petitioners are subsequently arrayed as accused and in case they apprehend their arrest, they can very well move the appropriate court for appropriate reliefs if any. Reserving this right of the petitioners, this petition is closed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv B.A. No. 2190/2008 : 3: