COCP No. 1997 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1997 of 2010 Date of decision:- 14.10.2010 J.N. Mehta ......petitioner vs. Satbir Singh Lochab ......respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. N.K.Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Petitioner alleges the violation of the order passed by this Court on 1.12.2003 in a writ petition filed by Brig. Partap Singh Hooda. In the said writ petition, the petitioner has sought refund of the amount claimed on account of enhancement of compensation of the acquired land. The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider and grant benefits to the petitioner after the matter regarding the compensation is decided by this Court after remand order by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the matter is still pending and the question of determination of compensation is also pending consideration. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I find that the present contempt is wholly misconceived. The petitioner is not a party to the writ petition. Still further as an allottee of the plot by Haryana Urbvan Development Authority, it is not permissible for the petitioner to claim that COCP No. 1997 of 2010 -2- compensation for the land acquired, should be reduced or refunded to the petitioner. In view of the above said fact I do not find any case is made out for continuation of the present contempt petition proceedings. Consequently, the present contempt petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 14 .10.2010 preeti