-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.111 OF 2002 Smita Akaram Pawar .. Appellant. Vs. Akaram Ramkrishna Pawar .. Respondent. Mr.R.R.Salvi for the appellant. Ms.P.M.Bansali for the respondent. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2008. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2008. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2008. PC: PC: PC: . Heard. 2. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties the spouses have been successful in arriving at amicable settlement and settlement terms have been placed before us in the form of consent terms which have been signed by both the spouses, who are present before us. 3. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X". The settlement terms arrived between the parties as well as undertaking are accepted and the appeal is disposed off in terms of the said settlement. 4. Decree be issued in terms of the consent terms. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)