IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2011 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 623 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33866/2010 Dated 11/11/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- P.R.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI,RAMAKRISHNA VIHAR, KALLUVATHUKKAL.P.O,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR SMT.HENA BAHULEYAN RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------------- SHRI.D.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI,AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,S/O.DAMODHARAN PILLAI,RADHAKRISHNA MANDIRAM,VILAVOORKONAM,P.O.KALLUVATHUKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT PIN:691578. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N. RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------- Contempt Case (C) No.623 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Sri.P.K.Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the lack of clarity in the averments, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the contempt case, reserving liberty with him to file a fresh contempt case with better particulars. Leave granted as prayed for and the contempt case is dismissed as withdrawn. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. nj.