^-1^ .INSIF BBiCW BEFORE THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATIS6ARH AT BILASPUR a^ Petitioner: T^ W.P.(C) No.^...../2011 M/s Shivalik.Powr <& Steel Pvt. Ltd, Through Its^birector, Vishal Sharma, S/o Shri S.N. Sharma, Aged about 38 years, 6./0 (Sanesh Ram Nagar, Raipur Dist, Raipur. C6 State. Versus Respondents; ^..; ^..<c \^:p' - >^x\^ -x...-^^..>-' .-•' •^•"1^' ...o'" :,'<5i' r)f 0?"l^./••'" '-^'-' ^ *° ^" ?A ''• ^ f.y /^Y ^^ jaiS.S. ^^ik)® c-^7^ vty ^^" Tk< - 1.5tate of C6, Through Secretary, (Energy), 6ovt of C.G. DKS Bhawan, Raipur Raipur bist, C6 State. ^.2. Chief Electrical Inspector, 6ovtofC.£., 36/437, Ist Floor, Bairan Bazar, Raipur, Raipur Dist (CG) f_ 3. Superintending Engineer, Office of Chief Electrical Inspector, 36/437,1st Floor, Bairan Bazar, Raipur, Raipur Dist (C6) ^4. DistCollector, Collectorate, Mahasamund t)ist, (C6). 5. The Tahsildar, Mahasamund, Mahassamund Dist, C6 State. K^^ u / 6. The Chief Engineer(Comml), CSPDCL, Dangania, Raipur, C6 State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTTCLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APROPRIATE WRITfS) / OR&ER (S} / DrREDCTCON (SY ETC. -T -HC-22 •s^ -ill'illd'M, ri'dl'y'lti. fawKHy 3n^?T }p^ k3<p.(cVvo. ^^/1 n "WI. 20d ^n-R'ffaiwcii snt^i'^t K.-V* 3n^i wRWHfta 3D^['TOIIW ^lfel SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohan S H/1 28-04-2011 Shri K.R.Nair, counset for the peltitioner Shri v.v.S.ivlurthy, Deputy Advol: i to 5 on aavance copv. This petition has been nled b^ notice issued on 18/8/08 (Annexure reauirea to pav eiectricity autv in respeil Learned counsel for the petitiontr industr^ as laid down in the State lr| unaer ciause y), petrtioner naving e{ generation plant in tne year 2UUB. Mq industnal Poiicv, in para a relatmg to fcl is entitiea to totai exemption ror me commencement OT commerctai proailction. naving declared exemption and rep|i Retitioner altered his posltion bv a(t estaDlisning non-conventionai power navlng deciared such exemption, tne r^spona< the petitioner is entitted to exempuon penoa ot tne penoa rrom uecemDer, submitted that when demand notiet reDresenacon to tne cnier tiectncai IEI claiming exemption from payment OT 18/2/10. but Detitioners application for] duty has not been conssaerea nor any| proceedings for recovery nas Deen issi) qii'M^^ <-ii^^ft ^ T^%t <r<si^i< ^; srfsgq an^i nnvastava, u, ;ate uenerai on Denair OT responaents the petitioner aggrievea DV aemana ). Dy whicn the petitioner nas Deen of consumption of eiectricity. submits that the petitioner is a thrust Idustriai Policv, 2004-09 i'Annexure-3 fetablisned a non-conventionai power furtner suomits mat unaer tne btate lectncity uury txemption, tne petitioner iDeriod of 15 vears from the date of i. !t is submitted that the State jresentation naving Deen maae, tne tting on the said representation by aeneration piant. Me suomits tnat r^sponaent cannot reruse ana tnererore, |from eiectricity duty in respect of the 12006 to February, 2008. It is further fe was issuea. me oetrtioner maae IsDector on 14/7/2010 (Annexure P/9), biectricitv dutv under certificate dated exemption from payment of eiectricity decision has been taken and instead, ged agalnst the petitioner. I'T^ •>Ra-! ^ /r^St ••fsss^i ,§(:I-HC-22 SII^I^EF f<'fi.<* sn^r sh^\cti yfscr a ueepii Td -i||i|lc1'4, ^Til'yild. (««nmy *<|t|WT Shliqi 31T^T^-g? ..uQ.l:..^.ly^..:..^Li^tl 200 ^^T' sn^i t^iTWdft^ 5- ^i^^i *\wv^ ^ [s^[ <r3i^i< ^; 3lf;(FT SII^f From the averments made in ti|ie petition, it is found that the petitioner claims to have estabiished a non-corjventional energy generation unit in the year 2006. The Industriai Poiicy fo|r the year 2004 to 2009 provides for exemption witn regard to payment of containeo in para 3 thereoT. i nerefcre, tne eiasm or me petitioner aoes not aopear to De rnvoious ana requires consiaeration. in tnese circumstances. dtem it expeaient to ciirect tne t;nieT Eiectrica! inspector-responaem Nd exempuon rrom payment or eiectrici|y auty, in respect or tne penoa Trom December 2006 to Februarv, 2008, betore responaent No.2, wltnin a per! eiigiDiiity. untii the claim ot tne petitj Wrtn tne aforesaic! oDservationt lectricity duty ror ali thrust industries as .2 to decide "s ciaim- tor In accordance wim law. l ne petitioner wouid be at iiDertv to submit fresn rebresentation aiong v/itn reievant aetaiis od of one montn from toaav. un sucn reDresemation made. responaent Nt?.2 snaii aeeiae petitioners ciaim ror oner ror gram OT exemption is aeciaea, no coerclve steps shall De taKen t^y any OT tne responaents to recover electric!tv aury under aemana notice (l^nnexure m.). , the petition is finailv disposed off. Sd/- Manindra MohanShrivastava Judge [Tfr^^f^'£t