IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9944 of 2008. Decided on: 23.06.2011. _______________________________________________ Dr. Satish Sharma. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The post of Lecturer in question has to be filled-up according to the existing Recruitment and Promotion Rules by way of transfer from amongst Ayurvedic Chikitsa Adhikaries having rendered 3 years regular service or regular combined with continuous ad hoc (rendered upto 31.3.1991) service in the grade, failing which by direct recruitment. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. Mr. Janesh Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have not been adopting the uniform practice for filling-up the post in question by way of transfer on the basis of seniority. 3. Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General on the basis of instructions imparted to him by Mr. Kartar Singh, Section Officer of respondent-Department submits that now the post in question shall be filled-up by transfer on the basis of seniority. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to fill-up the posts in question strictly as per undertaking given hereinabove, by way of transfer on the basis of seniority alone. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 23, 2011. (sck).