THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 15073 of 2010 Dated: 29.06.2010 Between: Upputuri Ramanamma, Prakasam District. … Petitioner And The District Collector, Prakasam District and 4 others. … Respondents THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 15073 of 2010 O R D E R : Petitioner’s authorisation in respect of fair price shop of Botlapalem Vilage, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District was cancelled by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings dated 23.11.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent and the same was also dismissed by order dated 02.03.2010. The petitioner states that against the order of the 2nd respondent, she preferred a revision petition before the 1st respondent and the same is still pending. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in disposing of the petitioner’s revision petition as well as the petition for stay, the present writ petition has been filed. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. As the revision petition is pending before the 1st respondent-District Collector, though I am not inclined to express any opinion as to the correctness of the concurrent findings recorded by the respondents 2 and 3, I am of the opinion that the revision petition requires consideration expeditiously. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the revision petition pending on his file following due process of law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Till such time, the respondents are directed not to make any permanent appointment of the dealer in respect of the shop in question. No costs. ​ ____________ G.ROHINI,J Date: 29.06.2010 KLP