HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR M.A. 605 of 2005 CORAM'. Ghanshyam Prasad Joshi, 5/0 Madhav Pmsad Joshi, Aged abouT 5O years, R/o Village Mu‘rnur, Tehs“ - Jugdnlpur, Dist: Bas‘rar' (C5) Versus Chhofelnl 5/0 Shri Bisun Singh, Aged ubouT 26 years, R/o Bahodur- 6uda Near House of Pa'mi Guruji, Jagduipur, Dis’r: Bash!" (C.G.) Mcikee‘r Singh, 5/0 5hri Mahendra Singh. R/o Geedam Naka, Jagdalpur, Dis+ : Basfur - (C.G.) The Orienfal Insurance Company Through - Branch Mumgerr Main Road, Sadur Buzar, Jugdalpur, Dist : Basfar - (C.6.) Bu'fohi Jhn, 5/0 Sidheswar- Jha, Aged abouf 4?) years, R/o Viilage - Geedam Naka, Jqgdalpur', Disf : Bas‘rar (C.6.) (The Trial Cour‘l' came To The conclusion fha'l' The responden‘r no.4 is nei‘rher a owner of ihe vehicle nor ‘l'he driver and hence not liable +0 pay any compensgfion.) Appellan‘rs Responden'rs Shri Prafulla Bhara‘r, Advocni'e for The appellant ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24*“ Jmuary, 2006) The following oral order of fhe Courf was passed by DILIP RAOSAHEB DESHMUKH, J. Hon'ble Shri 5R. Noyok, C3 & Hon'ble 5hri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. 1. In this appeal, The grievance of fhe appellanf is fha‘f The Tribunal has ne'r assessed fine compensa‘rion To be awarded for *he laid up period. From a perusal of The impugned award, we find Tha'hno permanenf disabilify was suffered by ‘rhe appellant The Tribunal has held Tha'l' due 1'0 the injury suffered by lhe appellant in his lef‘l‘ hand, he could no'r perform fhe agricultural opera'l'ion for a period of fhree weeks, and 1herefore, he was required To engage a labourer during the aforesaid period and awarded an amoun'l' of Rs.1,000/-. In our opinion. fhe compensation awarded by The Tribunal in The above menTioned head cannoT be faulTed wiTh. No oTher ground was urged in This appeal. 2. The appeal is devoid of meriT and is dismissed accordingly. \ v Sd]. Sdl- Chief Justice ‘ Dilip‘Raosaheb Deshmukh ‘ Judge A l e;g“fl$e, \_ r ,, , ,,i a a , Wi l \