IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 2ND ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 23822 of 2006(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- DINESHKUMAR E., S/O.DASAN, KARRIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KAITHARAM, N.PARUR, EMPLOYED AS PEON, KERALA PRESS ACADEMY, KAKKANAD, ERNAKKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU, ADV. SRI.ANOOP JOSEPH. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. SECRETARY, KERALA PRESS ACADEMY, KAKKANADU. 2. SECRETARY, VADAKKEKKARA SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.3131, VADAKKEKKARA, NORTH PARUR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. BISIN T KUMAR, MURAVANTHURUTHU, VADAKKEKKARA, N.PARUR. 4. ANILKUMAR, S/O.SACHIDANANDAN, MANIYALIL HOUSE, VADAKKEKKARA, NORTH PARUR. 5. SUNIL KUMAR, S/O.SACHIDANANDAN, MANIYALIL HOUSE, VADAKKEKKARA, NORTH PARUR. W.P.(C). NO.23822/2006-J: 6. KRISHNADAS LAJJI, SREEKRISHNA HARDWARE, NEENDUR, VADAKKEKKARA, N.PARUR. ADV. SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN FOR R.2, ADV. SRI.M.V.ANANDAN FOR R1. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.23822/2006-J: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER FROM THE SUNRISE HOSPITAL, KAKKANADU. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE MONTHLY SALARY BILL OF THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R2.A: COPY OF THE EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATE AND AGREEMENT FOR RECOVERY FROM PAY DT. 13/03/2000 WITH RESPECT TO THE LOAN TAKEN BY R.3. EXT.R2.B: COPY OF THE EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATE AND AGREEMENT FOR RECOVERY FROM PAY DTD. 15/05/2000 WITH RESPECT TO THE LOAN TAKEN BY R.4. EXT.R2.C: COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 26/11/2004 ISSUED BY R.1. TO R.2. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. prv. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 23822 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT In the matter of recovery steps initiated at the instance of the second respondent the main contention is that the other guarantors are also equally liable and hence they may also be proceeded against. It is a matter for the petitioner to apprise the second respondent in which case the needful in accordance with law in the matter will be done by the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.23822 of 2006 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 24th September, 2008