.."^&K^ v- ^•-;;":;^^YI:V-^""".....- ^es^^^...-----" .u**'1***' k*--"' c^ T^a da d"-"" 3- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR ^3<f3- Vl.PSQCcf /2006 PETITIONER / Gulab Chandra Pandey, son of Late Shri Hriday Narayan Pandey; aged 76 years, R/o. Juna Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : y 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur ^p^ ^^ .^3. ^ ^2. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Through Commissioner, Municipal Council, Bilaspur Tehsildar, Bilaspur 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Bilaspur 5. Collector, Bilaspur WRJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CQNSTnTunojT OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTION (S| / ORDER(S) IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ^ XI-HC-22 3D^T^T f^TW 311^1 Stlli°t) Hf??T sm^i W^WI sh*<lch 3ST ^|4|icit|, axfl+f'Ko, RiiiKiy 3TT^q^, ^..WSL^^^± ?R[ ' 200 Rfc^ SIT^T^RITWHf^cT 11-09-2006 Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advoc^ite with Ku. Ritu Mishra, learned counssl for the petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, leamed Dv. Advocate General for the State/ respondents No.1,3, 4 & 5. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, l^arned counsel for respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation, Bilateur, Heard. The submission of Dr. Sh cbi-iifci<n-< 4iticiTfftecsl'<Ri<-ii< ^; 3f1^IT Stl^T ^kla is that a proceeding under Section 248 ofthe M.P. (C.G.) Larjd Revenue Code, 1959 (for short "the Code") is pending beforel the Tehsildar, Bilaspur, vide encroachment case No.20-A/68/2(jl05-06 and there is also an order of this Court in eartier writ pel Chandra Pandev vs. State of CMiattisaarii & Others) by making ition No.1197 of 2006 (Gulab observations that no demolition et^. shalt take place before passing of an order in the proceedings unc<er Section 248 of the Code, even then, the authorities of responden suoerstructure of the petitioner, \t/hich is standing on his private land bearing Khasra No.561/2. t No.2 are trving to demolish the (<fl^y^) XI-HC-22 an^T^T f^TRian^T sblitiHfgcT <TT<4CTTai*1|ch 3^ •*{wwi, aTfltf'Kc, Ridi+iy _..^m^ ^ ^ 200 Rid«A 3n^T?T(TTWHfN' -L- Shri Kachhawaha, learnejJ submits that the Corporatioh superstructure said to have been| No.561/2 and a decision from ttte However, looking to the aopreher|sion petitioner, which he is pressinoj respondent No.2 submits that he| no demolition ete. shall take pla( Section 248 of the Code are comifrleted order of that nature is passed in that the oetition mav be disoosed 1 satisfy the ground, for the time be The earlier order passed Chandra Pandev (supra), been placed on record vide the said order is ouoted as under ^rafeft^ WR?rr ffte^ rfSTRTt SrsTfwTsn^T counsel for respondent No.2, has not demolished any Iraised by the petitioner in Khasra Court of Tehsildar is awaited. raised bv the counsel for the verv hard, learned counsel for is ready to give undertaking that {;e untess the proceedings under before the Tehsildarand an the said matter. His submission is |of with this undertaking, which will Ing, raised bythe petitioner. Uv this Court in the case of Gulab almclst in similar cireumstances, has Ann4xure-P/12. The operative part of diDCitmsntS hSVS bw0H ^lsd "So far as appi^henston of demoliffon is concefned, no such betore me to sftow any\such action proposed to &e taken against the p^titionsr. expectea and ooservsp has already been drawti v%4'f\4't ft^\in r t«w»>/m*/^*^n U^k s»tcrtwiV/jr f^f\^wt*sf\Mf*f) u/i Howevsr, if is ihat wnen a proceeding by the authority under ttie staiuta'y authorify ss w^i ^^1^') XI-HC-22 *)1<4MI Sht<|ch SSTBIPTRTO, ®Tfly<l<s,Rldiy^ 3Tr^[T5T%. . ~^1?"<<^3>JO<. f^i%""""-" sn^T^iT f^rasn^r aiiiti.HfscT 3;rT^T?;RTrw^?cf _T^. *i'ii?d<i1-< w^i it te^ rfSiRzrc ^3lf^lT3n^T as ofher concemed \ govemment aufhortlies snsSuding ihs respons^nfs wouh! rsspoct se proviskms of isw and w/puM cenainly wast for me cfecfsfon which shaS ulfi^ateiy be rendered by the Tehaildsr aiter due 6nq[iiry undw Section 24S of ttie Land Hevenue Cocfe anef sha// not step into forcsfu! dQnjQ^on by s ^focsss unt(nown to fsw. VWth the afonssaKJ' observatton, ffre oetitton stsrids cSspos^ ofatS^ tnotion stsge wifh liberty to the petitioner to appl^ar fietore tne concemea y.'hich sha" b& 7s^?5*r*cter sncf ?'S!SQ hfs oecfaeo in accoraance Wtn iaw under Secnoo 245 of fhe Land Revenue CdcSe." In view of the aforesaid brder and atso in view of the pendency of the proceedings bef<tre the concerned Tehsildar and further in view of the undertakinb given by the counsel for the 1 Corporation that they are not go|ing to take any coercive steps unless the orders are passed by tlte Court of Tehsildar, this petition is disposed of at this stage with th^ obsen/ations that in view of the undertaking given by the counsel <or the Corporation no demolition shall take place unless the final 4>rders in the proceecfings under Section 248 of the Code are passfed and the further steps shall be subject to the said order. Accordinaly, the petition st^nds finalty disposed of on the terms referred to above. Sd/- SunilKupiarSinba Judge, ^ y% (•M^i^) ^ <? //f A'