IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 7th day of September, 2006 Crl. Bail Application No. 734 of 2006 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Jagpal Singh S/o Chetram, R/o Village Issopur, P.S. Mujari, Distt. Jayotiba Pyulaynagar (U.P.) At present R/o Dumanpuri, P.S. Khanpur, District Haridwar. ……….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 04 of 2006 Under Sections: 192, 201, 420, 468, 469, 471 of I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali Roorkee District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard This is bail application moved on behalf of Jagpal Singh, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 04 of 2006 under Section 192, 201, 420, 468, 469, 471 of the I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. The allegation against the applicant is that criminal case under Section 302 was pending against his son Raju in the court. On 02.06.2002, applicant Jagpal Singh made a false report to the police that his son got drowned near Vishwakarma Ghat in Haridwar, and simultaneously, gave a report to the court that his son has died by getting drowned in aforementioned Ghat. On the basis of said report, the criminal case pending against Raju (son of the applicant) was abated, after obtaining report from the police. Later on, the applicant’s son was found alive and First Information Report was lodged against the applicant, father of Raju. In the above facts and circumstances, it is not a fit case for bail. The bail application is rejected. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 07.09.2006 HN