IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.7201/2010 Shahjad Ali Vs. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 29.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Harendra Singh, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that initially in FIR No.321/2009 registered at Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur, the petitioner was arrested on 24.02.2010 and thereafter his arrest was shown in FIR No.354/2009 and 383/2009 on 25.02.2010, in FIR No.273/2009 on 26.02.2010 and in FIR No.101/2009 on 27.02.2010. All these FIRs were registered at the same Police Station. Recovery in only one FIR was shown to be made at the instance of the petitioner in FIR No.321/2009 and that was a motorcycle which the police had already seized under Section 102, Cr.P.C. In no other case recovery was made at the instance of the accused-petitioner. Petitioner was initially arrested in first case and thereafter he was made accused in series of cases. Except these, no other case was ever registered against the petitioner and in the past he has not been found involved in any other similar case. He is a young person aged about 22 years and wants to reform himself; he should be given opportunity to join the mainstream. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner would undertake not to indulge in any other offence in future. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Shahjad Ali Son of Shri Asgar Ali on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.383/2009, Police Station Murlipura, Jaipur, under Section 379 IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner is again found indulging in similar or any other offence at any point of time in future, the bail granted to him by this court in the present case and in other cases would be liable to be cancelled at the instance of the prosecution on this ground alone and stipulation to this effect shall be inserted in the bail bonds produced by the petitioner, and the sureties to be produced in support thereof shall be verified by the Tehsildar of the area concerned. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. thanvi