IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.21135 of 2011 Date of Decision.15.11.2011 Pushap Kumar AFM (retired) son of Shri Ram Lal .....Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijla Vitram Nigam Limited and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. K.L. Dhingra, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-8) given by the petitioner is considered by respondent No.3 and an appropriate decision is taken. 2. The 3rd respondent shall consider the representation under Annexure P-8 for release of the terminal benefits within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and if the amount is found due, the same shall be released within a further period of four weeks. 3. The writ petition is disposed of dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 15, 2011 Pankaj*