IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2011 / 12TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26450 of 2011(E) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. P. HEMALATHA, HOUSE KEEPER, GOVT. SCHOOL OFNURSING HOSTER, GENERAL HOSPITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. M. LYLA, HOUSE KEEPER, SCHOOL OF JUNIOR, PUBLIC HEALTH NURSES TRAINING CENTRE HOSTEL, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. C.R. THULASI BAI, HOUSE KEEPER, GOVT. SCHOOL OF NURSING HOSTEL, GENERAL HOSPOITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. V.K. VIJAYAKUMARI, HOUSE KEEPER, COLLEGE OF NURSING HOSTER, MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 011. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. A. SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO.26450/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF LETTER DATED 16/01/2006 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PAY REVISION COMMISSION - 2005. P2: COPY OF LAST REPRESENTATION DATED 26/08/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.26450 of 2011-E. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th October, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioners are working as House Keepers under the second and third respondents. They complain that they have not been given the scale of pay that is legitimately due to them. Some of the House Keepers also retired without acquiring even the minimum qualifying service for the grant of pension. They have submitted Ext.P2 representation setting out their grievances. The same is pending before the second respondent and no orders have been passed thereon till date. The petitioners therefore seek the issue of appropriate directions to consider and dispose of Ext.P2. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In view of the fact that the grievances of the petitioners are pending consideration of the first WP(C).No.26450/2011-E. 2 respondent, it is sufficient that the same is directed to be disposed of on an early date. 4. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievances of the petitioner detailed in Ext.P2 representation in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-