IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 1825 of 2008 Between: J.Prassanavani, w/o Venkateswara Rao, R/o Peruru Village, Amalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (PW) East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 the Divisional Panchayat Officer, Amalapuram, East Godavari District. 3 Gram Panchayat, Peruru, Amalapuram mandal, East Godavari District rep., by its Secretary. 4 B.V.V.Satyanarayana, s/o Satti Raju, r/o Thotlapalem, Peruru Village, Amalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more especially in the nature of mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings vide Rc.No.2238/2004-A3 dt.22-7-2004 issued by 1st respondent canceling resolution No.57, dt.30-7-2003 of 3rd respondent Gram Panchayat without giving anyopportunity and without assigning any reasons as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and topass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper on the circusmtances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr.M.Prabhaker Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.4: The Court made the following : O R D E R: The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings vide Rc.No.2238/2004-A3, dated 22.07.2004 issued by the 1st respondent canceling resolution No.57, dated 30.07.2003 of the 3rd respondent Gram Panchayat without giving any opportunity and without assigning any reasons, as illegal and arbitrary. It is stated that as against the orders passed by the 1st respondent in Rc.No.2238/2004-A3, dated 22.07.2004 for naming the building of Gram Panchayat in the name of Bontu Satti Raju and Satyanarayanamma for donating a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for construction the said building as per the resolution of the Gram Panchayat No.168, dated 05.09.1996, a writ petition was filed in W.P.No.14710 of 2004. When the Gram Panchayat itself passed resolution, I am not inclined to express any opinion with regard to the bona fides on the part of the Gram Panchayat in filing the writ petition. However, the said writ petition is said to have been pending and the petitioner intends to question the said order of the 1st respondent dated 22.07.2004 in this writ petition. The petitioner is not an aggrieved party and there is no justification on the part of the Gram Panchayat to question the impugned order at this juncture. However, when the matter came up for admission on 01.02.2008, it was directed to produce the relevant record relating to W.P.No.14710 of 2004, but no such material has been filed. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:29.02.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS}