IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2009 / 2ND ASHADHA 1931 CRP.No. 267 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28/02/2009 IN E.P.NO.62/2004 IN AC.NO.7/2007 of II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): JUDGMENT DEBTORS 1 & 2: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.VEEPEES ENTERPRISES, NEAR KALIDAS MOVIE HOUSE, NARAKAL, KOCHI - 682 505, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.KURIAN JOSEPH. 2. KURIAN JOSEPH, S/O.LATE JOSEPH THOMAS, VALIYAVEETIL PUTHENANGADI HOUSE, SUDHALAYAM, NARACKAL, KOCHI - 682 505. BY MR.R.D.SHENOY, SENIOR ADVOCATE, MR.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN. RESPONDENT(S): DECREE HOLDER & JUDGEMENT DEBTORS 3 TO 5: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. V.P.GEORG JOSEPH, S/O.LATE JOSEPHTHOMAS, VALIYAVEETIL PUTHENANGADI HOUSE, NARAKKAL, NOW RESIDING AT 29/79, JANATHA ROAD, VYTTILA, KOCHI - 19. 2. ALICE JOSEPH, W/O.LATE JOSEPH THOMAS, VALIYAVEETIL PUTHENANGADI HOUSE, SUDHALAYAM, NARACKAL, KOCHI - 682 505. 3. JETTU JOSEPH, S/O.LATE JOSEPH THOMAS, VALIYAVEETIL PUTHENANGADI HOUSE, SUDHALAYAM, NARACKAL, KOCHI - 682 505. REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER V.P.JOSE, S/O.V.P.T.JOSEPH, 'JYOTHIS', PARAKAL ROAD, NARAKKAL, KOCHI.682 505. 4. MARYKUTTY THOMAS, W/O.DR.THOMAS JOSEPH, VALIYAVEETIL PUTHENANGADI HOUSE, SUDHALAYAM, NARACKAL, KOCHI - 682 505. NOW RESIDING AT TRAVANCORE RESIDENCY, E-1, VTH FLOOR, MAMANGALAM, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV.MR.SHRIHARI(CAVEATOR) R1 BY ADV.SMT.P.VANI THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ORDER ON I.A.NO.1015/2009 IN C.R.P.NO.267/2009 DISMISSED 23/06/2009 SD/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.R.P.No.267 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 23rd June, 2009 ORDER The revision is filed against an order passed in an execution proceeding relating to the execution of an arbitral award. Overruling the objections of the judgment debtors, the execution court passed the impugned order for taking steps for proclamation for sale. That order is challenged in the revision. Learned counsel for the first respondent raised a preliminary objection that the revision will not lie against the impugned order. Having regard to the amended section 115 of the C.P.C., I find that the objection raised has to be sustained. The revision is dismissed as not maintainable. srd S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE