Petltloner COURT OF CHHATTBGARH AT W.P.No.4187 of Arvlnd Kumar Digraskar-S/o Late Shrs Krishna Rao Digraskar, Aged about 50 years, R/o Near Ganiyari Bada, TiiaRnagar, Bilaspur (CG). Respondents ^^^^^^^^^.s^. ^\ Versus 1. Sudhir Kumar Oigraskar S/o Late Krishna Rao Digraskar, Aged about 63 years R/o Nehrunagar, Bliaspur (CG). 2. Suresh Kumar Digraskar Aged about 61 years, S/o Late Krlshna Rao DSgraskar, R/o Dlgraskar CoSony, AmerE Road, Bilapsur (CG). 3. Anil Kumar Disgraskar Aged about 55 years, S/o Late Krlshna Rao Disgraskar, Manager, Bank of Baroda, Sakinaka Branch, Andheri, Mumbai. 4. Suhas Dabadhghao, D/o Late Krlshna Rao Digraskar; R/o Matri Chayya; Premnagar Coiony; BaSaghat (MP). 5. Smt.Mangia Kher, D/'o Late i<rishna Rao Disgraskar, C/o Late Shrl Ani! Kher, 557, BanR of Baroda Colony, Kathlwala Tank, Banwarkunwa Rd, indore (MP). S. Smt.Madhuri TeSang, D/o Late Krishna Rao Digraskar, C/o Shri Chandrashekhar Teiang, Advocate, Rall Toii, Gondia (MS). 7. State of C.G. Through Collector, Bllaspur (CG). (Writ Petitlon under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution of Sndis) (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) ^p Present:- Mr.Vtmiesh Bajpai, counsei for the petitioner. None present for respondents No.1 to 6. Mr.Avinash K.Mishra, Panei Lawyer for respondsnt No.7. _^^^^ •/' •^ ^^" ^ -^ .l^^^^^^^^l^ p^-^.^-^——^' u —z- ORAL ORDER (Passedon 17th August, 2010) 1. Heard. 2. I have perused the order dated 17.9.2003 passed by the Board of Revenue in Rsvislon Case N0.468/A-6/02-03. 3. in the present case, virtuaify the present petitioner Is a substanttal petltioner for mutation of the iand on the basis of tsstamentary and non-testamentary succsssor, therefore, by directlng the petltloner to begun the evldence, the Nazui Officer as weil as the Board of Revenue have not commltted any iliegaSlty. 1 do not flnd any merit in this petttion. 4. Accordingly, the petstion bejng devoid of merlt is llable to be dSsmissed and it is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. _ _ Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge flA ^ i^^:5^-<^^^%