1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.REVISION NO.170 OF 2008 (NAMDEO KISAN GAWHANE Vs AJMAL YUNUS GONDIL) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri A Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant Shri Mahesh Rai, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2008. 1. Both, the complainant as well as accused i.e. applicant, respondent herein, have filed applications stating that they have settled the matter amicably. The original complainant has, in fact, filed an application for withdrawal of the criminal complaint whereas the accused has filed an application for compounding the matter. The offence for which the applicant is convicted is one punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and is compoundable. 2. Therefore, in view of two applications filed by the parties, who are present in the Court and duly identified by the 2 Advocates Shri Amol Deshpande and Shri Mahesh Rai, the conviction of the applicant by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Digras in Criminal Case No.1285/2005, confirmed in appeal by the learned additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.16/2006, is set aside. 3. The respondent i.e. original complainant would be at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the accused before the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha. The revision as well as applications filed today are disposed of accordingly. JUDGE RR.