IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 27939 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 1, 2010. Naseem ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S.Sihota, Sr.Advocate with Mr. B.R.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.150 dated 22.04.2010, under Sections 148/149/323/325/302/506 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. CRM No.M-27939 of 2010 It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 04.03.2010. It is further contended that petitioner and two other persons, namely, Anish and Tahir caused injuries to a witness, namely, Anjum and that however, as per MLR there is only one injury on the person of Anjum. Further contends that petitioner was not present at the time of occurrence and that entire family of the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It has been stated by learned counsel for the State that injury on the person of Anjum has been attributed to three persons including the present petitioner. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Naseem is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Palwal. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) November 1, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2