IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2010 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR W.P.No. 35507 of 2006 K.C. GOVINDASAMY PETITIONER Vs 1 THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, COLLEGE ROAD, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI -6. 2 THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER, TIRUVANNAMALAI, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. 3 THE ASST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KALASAPAKKAM POLUR TK. TIRUVANNAMALAI DIST. RESPONDENT Prayer Original Application No.9170 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to direct the Respondents to award Special Grade in Middle School Headmaster post for the Petitioner wef 1.10.1984 onwards and monetary benefits w.e.f. 1986 for the said Special Grade Middle School Headmaster post on par with his juniors and further direct the Respondents to award the consequential benefits including the arrears of pay benefits.Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A was re-transferred and numbered as Writ Petition. For Petitioner .. Mr. K. Thennan For Respondents .. Mr. S. Sivashanmugam Government Advocate ORDER Original Application No.9170 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to direct the Respondents to award Special Grade in Middle School Headmaster post for the Petitioner wef 1.10.1984 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ onwards and monetary benefits w.e.f. 1986 for the said Special Grade Middle School Headmaster post on par with his juniors and further direct the Respondents to award the consequential benefits including the arrears of pay benefits.Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A was re-transferred and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. The retired Middle School Headmaster seeks monitory benefits with effect from 1986 stating that he is entitled to get Special Grade in the Middle School Headmaster Post with effect from 01.10.1984 and the monetary benefit from 01.04.1986. He has made a representation on 14.11.1997. It is not clear whether such representation has already been disposed of or not. In any event, if the grievance of the petitioner has not been addressed, it will suffice if a direction is issued to the first respondent to consider petitioner's claim. Accordingly, petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation to the respondents, on receipt of such representation, the respondents shall dispose off the same on merits within a reasonable period of time preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the said representation. With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. sms To THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, COLLEGE ROAD, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI -6. 2 THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER, TIRUVANNAMALAI, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. 3 THE ASST. ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KALASAPAKKAM POLUR TK. TIRUVANNAMALAI DIST. W.P.No. 35507 of 2006 BV (CO) kk 22/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/