1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Third Bail Application No. 10121/2010 Shyam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 11.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Anil Upman - for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused Kailash has already been granted bail. Prosecution story is not supported by the material witnesses and they have been declared hostile. Otherwise, petitioner is behind bars for last ;more than ten months. Trial is likely to take time. Hence, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this 2 case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Shyam Singh may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 07/2010 registered at Police Station – Narainpur, Alwar for offence under Section/s 489B and 489C IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma