IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No. 30 of 2011. Decided on: 20.4.2011. Jeet Ram Panwar & others ……….petitioners Versus M.P. Sood. ….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the process for implementation of the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 5138 of 2008, decided on 27th October, 2010 has already been started by the respondent. The same shall be completed within a further period of four weeks. However, the final decision will abide by the decision rendered in LPA, having been preferred against the judgment dated 27th October, 2010 rendered in CWP (T) No. 5138 of 2008. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. April 20, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.