IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.29310 OF 2008 1. SHANTI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE BANARSI PODDAR 2. MANTUN PODDAR @ NARAYAN PODDAR, SON OF LATE BANARSI PODDAR 3. MANIKANT PODDAR @ MANIKANT, SON OF LATE BANARSI PODDAR ALL RESIDENT OF MALGODOWN ROAD, POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT KHAGARIA ………………………………………………………………………………PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DILIP SAH, SON OF LATE CHINTAMAN SAH, RESIDENT OF MALGODOWN ROAD, POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT KHAGARIA ………………………………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ********** 2 22/06/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 31.03.2008 passed in Criminal Revision No. 98 of 2006 by which the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. III, Khagaria has affirmed the order dated 08.09.2006/11.09.2006 passed in Complaint Case No. 1042C of 2005 by which the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria has taken cognizance for the offences alleged to have been committed under Sections 384 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners have challenged the impugned orders on the ground that there are insufficient materials to make out a case under Section 384 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. On perusal of the orders impugned, this Court 2 finds that prima facie, a case is made out against the petitioners and as such, there is no illegality in the impugned orders. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )