1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5060/2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3269 OF 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 Heard Shri Raghute, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Pillai, learned Counsel for the respondent no.2. Civil Application No.5060/2006 is moved by the petitioners for clarification of order dated 25.7.2006 passed by this Court. We have considered the contentions of the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the above referred order. In the writ petition, vide prayer clause (1), petitioners were seeking direction to respondent no.2 for implementation of order dated 24.12.2004 passed by the respondent no.2. The petition came to be disposed of in view of statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 that criminal 2 proceedings are initiated against respondent no.4 for violating provisions of the Mathadi Act. Shri Pillai, learned Counsel for the respondent no.2, states that said action is taken by the respondent no.2 Board under the provisions of the Mathadi Act for not implementing the order dated 24.12.2004 by the concerned persons. In view of above referred statement, it appears that action taken by the respondent no.2 is consistent with the provisions of Mathadi Act. The learned Counsel for the petitioners at this stage states that if grievance of the petitioners is not fully redressed, the petitioners will take appropriate steps in this regard. Be that as it may, in the backdrop of the above referred facts, no case is made out for showing indulgence. The civil application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj