1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 381 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 105 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 636 OF 2009 Shri Sudhir N. Deshpande ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.N. Deshpande, Petitioner in person present. Mr.D.W. Bhosale for the Applicant. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JANUARY 4, 2010 P.C. :- 1 The applicant has filed this chamber summons seeking leave of this court to intervene in the contempt petition filed by the petitioner. 2 It is submitted that though no contempt is alleged against the present applicant, the applicant is a proper and necessary party to the contempt 2 petition since the applicant has paid an amount of Rs.2 lakhs which was payable to the petitioner herein out of the Six lakhs which were to be paid by respondent nos.1 and 2 as per the particulars of claim, in the execution proceedings taken out by the petitioner herein. 3 In my view, the applicant has no locus to intervene in the contempt petition since no contempt is alleged against the present applicant. Chamber Summons, accordingly, is dismissed. 4 The learned Counsel for the applicant, however, submits that in the execution proceedings, his office has been seized and as a result, he is unable to get the necessary documents which are kept in the office. Liberty is granted to the applicant to take appropriate steps for the purpose of taking appropriate orders in the execution proceedings in accordance with law. (V.M. KANADE, J.)