IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38441 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:27.12.2010. Poonam and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) The petitioners are stated to be major having been married contrary to the wishes of their parents. It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that there is an apprehension that life and liberty of the petitioners will be prejudiced at the instance of private respondents through the official respondents. The petition is disposed of with an observation that in case there is any imminent danger to the life and liberty of the petitioners, respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad either himself or any other officer deputed by him will look into the representation already filed by the petitioners (Annexure P-5) and in case there is any truth in the representation filed, he will ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners, from unnecessary harassment. Respondent No.2, if requires, can call for the petitioners and other relations for any amicable settlement. December 27, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE