C^ler^^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. 11/389/2010. PETITIONER: p. .< 3 -• ^5- ^,^ . p.-t) '.••'• ^W9> >^s<y ^c-^/ <^'i^>y <i••v jy' 2>3 Respondents . i".ss.Se-w^ .^^.^ws^^ ""'"iS!., ./r ^..TSs-^k., ^;^?^'1 "vt. / ^ ^i '(fsft-ys^v'^ K'^~3Mi w gygv1„<«°• Smt.Usha Lata Namdeo, wife of M-L ^^cfie., \^ aged about 57 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Basic Training Institute, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. /- 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA ^ sn^i^i K-w* ^Pff 3H^?T StiHief) "\ HW?tT VhWSh 'S'^ -41-41tf1, ®Tll<H'l<c,f°<diyy ^.....u.f.m...^....a.i^^ gn^i 'q^q; (''pfg^i) WIIWBfelSII^B ^^i atoa'blielttil MaalBdni Btohaa 8hi?Iva»ttwa,J. lt.8.2010 Sfari K;S. Pawar, counsel Sbri Viaod Tekam, Paael Heaid on adiaission. Circulfer ofoixler Jabsj^ii Leamed counsel for fhe entitled to graat of regulai| appointment ia vicw of iGovermaaent and ia view Adnuaistrative Triibunal, 274S/89 yawaamlecmt radu| ottters^, whieh later on, attai4ei was dismissed by fhe SupTenjie petitioner submits that caaeofl3ae petitioaer. learded On ttie ofher hand, that if the petitioncr Glaims petitioner ought to have flrst such benefit • Taking into consideratk»)3i and also'tafcmg iato cousidetfetioa *l<lf<'l<il-l 'WRff ^ffwt <r«n<(i< i; sifin 3iit?i for fhe petittoxicr. • Lawyer for fhe State, on advancc copy. [pctilioner submits that the petitioaer is pay-scate fliom fhe itiitial date of dated 13.1.2009 issiied by tiie State passed by fhe Madfaya Pradesh Sta.tc feur (for short 'the SAT^ in OJL Ko. |nn«l S6 atfiers Vs. iStertB of KP. A ^ed SsaSty, asS.L.P. ^aiast thesaiae, Court -aiso. Leacaed coansel for tiie inay be directed to consider the respoi^deate couasel for ttie respoaftente submits benefit of Circular dated 13.1.2009, approached the respoadents, clamuag the submissions m^e by fhc partfes that oiders havc been passed IDL- r" 1~ .»a:51 XI-HC—78 sn^i qii R-iiq> ^T^ 3?T^?I'^Til^? praveea ?:=T •^nw^, yxil'M'Ko, ftidiy^ NI*I(IT <ih^ra> sn^i Ti°Hi' (yls^'^) TOnw^tei3]iin ~L, aumber of cases, petitioner is Aufhorities, claimmgbenefEtb, ig benefit:b4s»t If-QsK pefittoner staads by the SAT ia Wadftufcttnt by fhe Supreme Gourt in Spe^ ordcr dated 3.1.1994, ttie dn ydda petitjoner Witfa fhe- aforesaid disposcd ofiF. • ob^erffations, fhc pctitioa stands BasSy SifiT^f'^^-i 'RW?ff ^f l^^ <f<if<^R ^aifinsti^i g^anted liberty to appa'oach »esp<atdcat- oa Ciroiilar dated 13.1.2009. fhe same footings as per ordw (supr^ aad subsequcnlty confirmed ;ial teave Petitfon (Ov^ No.^92/93 by maybc entitled to saaae reBef. - Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge