THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICEG.ROHINI W.P.NO.16422 OF 1999 DT.02.06.2010 Between: V.Vijaya and six others. ………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endtt-II) Dept., Hyderabad and another …………………..Respondents. O R D E R: The petitioners herein are working in T.T.D., in different posts. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not regularising their services, the petitioners had earlier filed W.P.No.25861 of 1996. They also sought a direction for payment of the scale of pay on par with other similarly situated persons. The said writ petition was disposed of by this court by order dated 30.09.1997 with a direction to the respondents to create ‘7’ more posts in the cadres in which the petitioners were working and regularise their services. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in taking steps in terms of the said order, the present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to create ‘7’ posts with time scale of pay. When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri G.Jagadiswar Rao, learned counsel appearing T.T.D. placed before this court a memo No.11295/Endts.111/A2/99-20, dated 19.03.2004 under which the proposal submitted by the TTD for creation of ‘9’ posts was rejected. In the circumstances, if aggrieved, it is for the petitioners to challenge the said order passed by the first respondent by working out the appropriate remedy available under law. Accordingly, granting leave and liberty to the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI J., Dt.02.06.2010 tjs