IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 22047 of 2010 Date of Decision: 10.12.2010. Manjit Kaur --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 4 only. Ms. Kavita Arora, A.A.G., Punjab has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner applied for the post of Physical Training Mistress in response to the Advertisement No. 1/2006 and subsequent public notice no.2/Oct., 2006. Selection was required to be made on the basis of merit in the qualifying examination. According to the petitioner her merit is 121.58 points, whereas one Usha Rani who secured only 120.58 points, has been selected and petitioner has been ignored in general category. Petitioner served a legal notice (Annexure P-3) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 22047 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 10.12.2010. lucky