IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20096 of 2010 GUDDU YADAV son of Ram Swarup yadav, resident of Mohalla krishnapuri, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Munger….Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ------------------ 2 14.6.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 341, 323, 504, 427 of the Indian penal Coded as also under section 3(1) (X)(XI) SC & ST (POA) Act, co-accused Bam Bam Yadav is the order giver, where-after 50-20 unknown accused persons are alleged to have demolished the house of the informant and few other persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the next door neighbour of the informant and has not been named in the FIR as an accused. All the offences under the Indian penal Code are minor and bailable one only offences under section 3(1)(X)(XI) SC & ST (POA) Act is non-bailable. The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody since 21.3.2010. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Munger in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case no. 107/10, subject to the conditions: (a) That one of the bailors must be Govt. servant or close family member of the petitioner who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner. - 2 - (b) If the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman