IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19140 of 2011 ARUN MANDAL @ ARUN KUMAR MANDAL SON OF RAMANAND MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LASKARI, P.S. BANKA, DISTRICT BANKA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.6.2011. Heard Shri Brij Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Abhay Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Banka P.S. Case No.398 of 2009 (Sessions Trial No.160 of 2011) registered for the offence under Sections 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to agnatic dispute, the petitioner has been made accused. It was further submitted that F.I.R. was lodged on the basis of fardbeyan of the injured and in the fardbeyan, he had made categorical statement that he was attacked by one unknown person. However, at subsequent stage, during re-statement, the victim named this petitioner and falsely, the petitioner was implicated in the present case. 2 It was further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 13.1.2011. In view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C.-Ist, Banka in Banka P.S. Case No.398 of 2009 (Sessions Trial No.160 of 2011) with a condition that one of the bailors must be either his mother, father or his own brother or sister and secondly, during the trial, on each and every date, the petitioner shall remain physically present before the court below, failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, in special exigency, he can remain absent on a particular date with prior permission of the trial court. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)