COCP No. 1461 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1461 of 2010 Date of Decision:30.7.2010 Ranjit Kaur .....Petitioner Versus Amar Singh and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Vikas Mehsempuri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) It is the case of the petitioner that the order passed by the Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala on 11.10.2000 was subject matter of revision before the learned Financial Commissioner. Earlier the order of the Commissioner was stayed by the learned Financial Commissioner, but on 10.1.2007, the stay was vacated. In a writ petition against the said order, the operation of the impugned order dated 10.1.2007 was stayed by this Court vide order dated 14.5.2007. It is contended that though by virtue of the order passed by this Court on 14.5.2007, the order passed by the Commissioner is deemed to be stayed, but the respondents have mortgaged the land. COCP No. 1461 of 2010 [2] Thus, the said mortgage is in violation of the order passed by this Court. The partition proceedings are to enjoy separate possession. Mortgage of the land is an encumbrance on the rights of ownership. An act of mortgage cannot be said to be in violation of the order passed by this Court. I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 30.7.2010 ds