IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35653 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR YADAV @ KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.11.2008 Heard Smt. Anjana Prakash, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Regard being had to the facts of the case and also considering that the case is in trial in which four witnesses have been examined, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. However, I shall direct the Additional Sessions 3rd, Barh, (Patna) who is trying Sessions Trial No.286 of 2008 arising out of Bakhtiarpur P.S.Case No.309 of 2006 to issue a notice to the officer-in-charge of the police station appending thereto a list of witnesses which are cited in the chargesheet for their production by the officer-in-charge of Bakhtiyarpur police station. The copy of the notice must be forwarded to the concerned Superintendent of Police and both of them shall ensure that witnesses who are mostly police officers are produced on day to day basis that - 2 - the trial if concluded in two months time from the date of issue of the notice. In case the trial is not concluded then the court make a report to this court as to why it could not achieve the target so that this court could examine proceeding against the police officials. The petitioner shall also always have similar prayer in place of the above observations. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )