IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44881 of 2008 KARU RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 18.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 392, 411 of the Indian Penal Code and is named in the First Information Report as the one who along with two others, snatched the mobile of the informant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that besides the present case, he is accused in one case under the Arms Act for recovery of arms, which counsel for the petitioner submits, was also recovered at the time of his arrest in the present case. He is in jail custody since 25.6.2008. In the circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected, however, with liberty to apply for grant of bail after completing one year in jail custody. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)