IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 20646-CII of 2009 & CR No. 4965 of 2009 Date of Decision: 1.9.2009 Gram Panchayat Munshiwali ....Petitioner. Versus Surja Ram @ Suja Ram and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. S.S. Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. C.M. No. 20646-CII of 2009 Application is allowed as prayed for. C.R. No. 4965 of 2009 The plaintiff-petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13.8.2009 passed by the trial court whereby an application filed by defendant No.1-respondent under Order 9 Rule 7 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the order dated 12.5.2006 proceeding against him ex parte, was allowed. On a specific query being put by the Court, the learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner could not show as to what prejudice has been caused to the plaintiff-petitioner by the impugned order. Even C.R. No. 4965 of 2009 -2- otherwise, it was not disputed that no evidence was led or other effective proceedings had taken place after passing of the ex parte order. In view of the above and after hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner, this Court is satisfied that there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. September 1, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE