cP -S^c^, _,, . • <S»u;^gfe ^^:-.-,-R, "•••:" •—^••^^i/j COURT FEES EJ 8INOW!CATfwNO. a96C -M7(MOa- 9^S-W -SKWW^SC DW£ * OFTHECOURTreESACT^78 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. fL) N0. S^8$^/2009 PETITIONER: r^ ^.^^ ^-.r^y^.- ?.a-rf«- &&^"'' RESPONDENT: State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Divisional Forest Officer, Kawardha, Forest Division - Kawardha (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Ashok Kumar Chandravanshi, S/o - Arjun Chandravanshi, R/o Satvahinia Ward No. 6, Kawardha, District - Kabirdham, (C.G.) 2. The Labour Court, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) A^"" ^1'1" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE.226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -^ ^' . ..sf^^. y ~\" HIGH CQURT_OF QiHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTTPETmONfL) No. 2285 of2009 State ofChhattisgarh. VERSUS Ashok Kumar Chandravanshi & RESPONDENTS WRFr PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA SB: flton'Me Sfari Satish K. Aemhotri. J. Sfari Sushil Dubey, Govermnent Advoeate for the State/ petitloner. Shri Ajit Sm^a, Advocate forfhe respondent No. 1. ORDER(OMAL) (Passed on 07U1 day of January, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appeariag fbr the petitioner, on mstmctions, submits that since the responderrt No. I has been regularized, the petition has become inlructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing tbr olfaer side does not controvert the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infi-uctuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt