In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan Bench At Jaipur. SB Civil Second Appeal No.192/09 Smt. Navita Jain v. M/s Kapoor Chand Tara Chand & others Date of order March 27, 2009 Hon'ble Justice JR Goyal Mr. Rohan Jain, for appellant This second appeal under S.100 CPC has been preferred by the appellant- plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 28.11.08 passed by Additional District Judge, Ramganj Mandi in Civil Regular First Appeal No.22/02, by which the judgment and decree dated 16.3.02 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ramganj Mandi in Civil Suit No.7/97 was maintained, whereby the suit preferred for recovery of Rs.27,200/- has been dismissed. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for recovery of Rs.27,200/- stating therein that a draft of Rs.20,000/- has been rendered to the respondent-defendant in lieu of loan dated 11.4.88. The aforesaid draft has been sent through post and has been received by the respondents, who promised to pay interest at the rate of 1% per month on the loan amount, but in spite of several reminders and legal notice, defendant-respondents did not pay the loan amount as well as interest accrued thereon. The defendant in his written-statement, denied the fact of any amount received by him as loan, but stated that the said draft has been given to him in business transaction. Trial court framed issues on the basis of pleadings and after hearing the parties, dismissed the suit of plaintiff-appellant. The First Appellate Court also affirmed the findings of fact arrived at by the trial court, hence this appeal. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. There are concurrent findings of fact of both the courts below arrived at on the basis of material available on record. There appears no substantial question of law involved in this matter. Keeping in view the entire facts and circumstances, I do not find any good reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and decree. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed in limine. (JR Goyal) J. db