In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh L.P.A. No. 1000 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2011 Sonepat Hindu Educational and Charitable Society, Sonepat ---Appellant versus State of Haryana and others ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr. S.K.S.Bedi, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Mr. Govind Goel, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 to 6 *** 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against order dated 16.5.2011 rendered by learned Single Judge holding that “No occasion would arise to direct the Registrar. He is expected to act in accordance with law”. 2. It is appropriate to mention that on earlier occasion, the same learned Single Judge has passed direction in Civil Writ Petition No. 13328 of L.P.A. No. 1000 of 2011(O&M) -2- 2010 on 17.1.2011. Last paragraph of the order dated 17.1.2011 would show that a contempt petition was filed against the respondents in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sonepat, which was dismissed. Some dissatisfaction was shown by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Single Judge has granted him liberty to make representation, if any thing was required to be done by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 at that stage. Accordingly, a representation was filed on 27.1.2011(P-10) which has now been disposed of by order dated 17.8.2011. A copy of the order passed yesterday by District Registrar, Firms and Societies, Sonepat, has been placed on record as Mark “A”. A copy of the same has also been furnished to the counsel for the appellant. 3. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual position and the order passed on 17.8.2011, we are of the view that a new cause of action has arisen to the appellant and the order dated 17.8.2011 passed by District Registrar, Firms and Societies, Sonepat, may have to be challenged before an appropriate forum in accordance with law. 4. The appeal has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE August 18, 2011 PARAMJIT