1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.53 of 2009 In Civil Application No.3168 of 2008 and Letters Patent Appeal No.10 of 2000 and Writ Petition No.985 of 1988 (D) (Gopal Damduji Shelwatkar v. Shri Sharad Shamraoji Karmore and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri Mujumdar, AGP for Respondent No.2. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 2 nd December, 2010 This Court, by the judgment and order dated 1-12-1999 passed in Writ Petition No.985 of 1988, had quashed and set aside the order of the School Tribunal and also the order of termination of the petitioner from service. The respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner in service and to pay full back wages and other consequential benefits after deducting an amount of Rs.7,560/-. Further, by an order dated 6-5-2008 passed on Civil Application No.3168 of 2008 filed in Letters Patent Appeal No.10 of 2000, this Court had directed the respondents to finalize the pension case of the petitioner within a stipulated period. The complaint is that both these orders are not complied with. 2 The dispute is regarding the quantum of back wages, which are payable to the petitioner. This Court had directed the respondents to pay full back wages to the petitioner. According to the respondents, the total amount back wages comes to Rs.11,00,112/- and the same has been paid. According to the petitioner, the total amount of back wages comes to Rs.12,55,526/-. The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that they shall approach the Education Officer for determination of the total amount of back wages payable to the petitioner and the decision of the Education Officer shall be binding upon the parties concerned. Shri Mujumdar, the learned AGP, submits that if such claim is made before the Education Officer within one month from today, the same shall be decided within a period of two months thereafter. So far as the direction regarding pension is concerned, Shri Kulkarni, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, submits that the pension papers have been submitted to the Competent Authority and there are no deficiencies or defects in submitting such papers. Shri Mujumdar, the learned AGP appearing for respondent No.2, submits that if all the deficiencies or defects are removed and the papers are received, the Education Officer shall take appropriate decision in the matter within a period of two months, if such steps are not already taken. In view of above, nothing survives in this contempt 3 petition and the same stands disposed of. Judge pdl