IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.25 of 2007 TARA SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 9 5.8.2008 In the instant case the petitioner has prayed for investigation of Fulwarisharif P.S. Case No.463/05 to be handed over to C.B.I. to find out the real culprits involved in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it could appear from Annexure-A ,supervision note made by S.P.Town,Patna that the informant, Jyoti Kumari, alongwith her associates Pramod Agrawal and others are the main culprits in this case. The S.P.Town, Patna gave certain guidelines to the I.O. for conducting the investigation regularly in respect of the persons who used the mobile of the deceased Vijay Mishra. In the instant case two persons have been killed. The petitioner is the wife of late Ajit Kumar Singh. Learned counsel further submits that the police submitted final report in perfunctory manner without following guidelines given by the City S.P. in this regard vide his report dated 12.6.2006. Learned counsel for the State submits that the police has submitted final report and if the petitioner is aggrieved she can file a protest –cum-complaint. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that this is a case in which two persons have been killed.As per the supervision note of the City S.P. the needle of suspicion points towards the informant Jyoti Kumari and Pramod Agrawal and others as culprits. It would be open to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Town S.P.,Patna pointing out that his directions - 2 - have not been followed. On receipt of representation, the city S.P. would take appropriate decision within three months. With the aforesaid observation and direction this application is disposed of. AnilKsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)