((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.580 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.400 OF 2008 Mrs.Neeta Upendra Chaube Applicant versus Upendranath Chandrabhushan Chaube and others Respondents Ms.Veena Gawda i/by Kokila Kalra for applicant. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for State. Seema Sarnaik for respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07th May 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant (original respondent in the revision applicant) and the learned counsel for the first respondent (applicant in revision application). A sum of Rs.40,000/- deposited by the revision applicant is pending in this Court. 2. The application is disposed of by passing following order :- (a) The first respondent in the revision application and the applicant in this ((-2-)) application is permitted to withdraw the said amount of Rs.40,000/- (Rs.Forty thousand only). The withdrawl will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties and subject to final outcome of the criminal revision application. (A.S.OKA, J.) ((-3-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.400 OF 2008 Upendranath Chandrabhushan Chaube Appellant versus Mrs.Neeta Upendranath Chaube & anr. Respondents Ms.Seema Sarnaik for appellant. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for State. Ms.Veena Gawda i/by Kokila Katra for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07th May 2009 PC : 1. The revision application was kept in chamber today. It is in the interest of both the parties and in the interest of the minor daughter that the parties put an end to the dispute. To be placed on 09th June 2009 at 05.15 p.m. in chamber. (A.S.OKA, J.)