IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6531 of 2011 Date of Decision: 02.08.2011 H.S. Naru Advocate . . .Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rai, DAG, Punjab. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he had scribed the power of attorney which is ultimately found to be fake. He submits that the petitioner is an Advocate, who had scribed the power of attorney as directed by the beneficiary, and has nothing to gain except for his fee. He further submits that in terms of order dated 24.5.2011, petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from SI Paramjit Singh, accepts the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view thereof, order dated 24.5.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 02, 2011 JUDGE vivek