IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1757 OF 2010 Between: Imtiyaz Ali …Petitioner And 1. Ishrath Sultana 2. Mohd. Meraj Ahmed 3. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. … Respondents This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1757 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision petition is filed questioning order, dated 30.07.2010, passed by the Additional Family Court-cum- Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of JHCBBC, Hyderabad, in M.C.No.156 of 2009, awarding maintenance of Rs.2,500/- to the first respondent/wife and Rs.2,000/- per month to the second respondent/minor child from the revision eptitioner. There is no dispute about relationship between the parties. There is also no dispute about both the parties living separately since some time prior to filing of the maintenance case in the lower Court. 2. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the petitioner is a private employee and is not able to deposit the entire arrears of maintenance in the lower Court and that if three (3) weeks time is granted, he would deposit the entire arrears of maintenance in the lower Court. As per the respondents’ case, the revision petitioner is doing jewellery business. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that amount of maintenance awarded by the lower Court is in no way excessive. I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the lower Court. 3. In the result, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. However, time of three (3) weeks from today is granted for deposit of entire arrears of maintenance as per the order of the lower Court. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J December 28, 2010 KL HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1757 OF 2010 December 28, 2010 KL