1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4469/2007 (Prithvi Raj Vs. U.O.I. & Ors.) Date of order : 7.11.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Tribhuvan Gupta, for the petitioner. Mr. Jitendra Chopta, for the respondents. Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, for UOI. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has applied for retail out-let to the I.O.C. The application of the petitioner was considered but at the time of consideration, the marks prescribed for the land was not properly assessed and only zero mark was given in the head of the marks awarded by the Interview Committee for capability to provide infrastructure and facilities. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the documentary evidence so furnished by the petitioner, he was to be given marks as per the norms for evaluating the candidature, which is placed on record as Annexure-9. 2 I have perused Annexure-9. Obviously, for different heads the marks are provided, therefore, the respondent Company is under obligation to assess the petitioner's claim on the basis of the marks so allocated by the Company for evaluating the candidature of the applicants. In this view of the matter, the petitioner may file fresh representation before the respondent Company and apprise that he is entitled for the marks. Upon filing such representation, the respondent Company shall decide the same on the basis of the documentary evidence as per rules. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun