IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 945 of 1995 (O&M) Pritam Singh and others ....... Appellants Versus The State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the land owners. Mr. Yatinder Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A. No. 435 of 1994 – Phole (deceased) through his LRs and others Versus The State of Punjab, the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. In the present appeal, Harbax Singh filed an application as legal representatives of Pritam Singh (appellant No.1) and Smt. Setto (appellant No.6) by alleging that he was given the property in question by appellant No.1 under family settlement, whereas appellant No.6 had executed a Will in favour of the applicant. On 4.12.2009, this Court ordered that the applicant can be impleaded as legal representative of appellants No.1 and 6 only after giving opportunity of hearing to the natural legal heirs of the deceased appellants. However, as the addresses of the legal heirs of R.F.A. No. 945 of 1995 (O&M) -2- appellants No.1 and 6 were not furnished, their services could not be completed. Therefore, while disposing of the appeals, this court leaves this point open. The issue regarding entitlement of compensation on account of death of Pritam Singh and Smt. Setto shall be considered by the Executing Court in execution proceedings. 23.07.2010 (RAJESH BINDAL) Gagan JUDGE