IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 16TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37688 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GEORGE SAMUEL, AGED 48 YEARS, PUTHEN PARAMBIL, PATHIRICKAL P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PATHANAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PATHANAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SALIM, HAMEEDIYA NIVAS, NEDUMPARAMBA PATHIRICKAL P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. JASMIN, W/O.SALIM, HAMEEDIYA NIVAS, NEDUMPARAMBA, PATHIRICKAL P.O., PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.37688 OF 2009 (E) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The case pleaded by the petitioner is that he made a complaint against respondents 2 and 3 alleging that a construction of car porch was made by them without obtaining necessary permit. Ext.P1 is the complaint made by the petitioner in this behalf before the first respondent. Accordingly Exts.P2, P4 and P5 notices were issued by the Panchayat to respondents 2 and 3 and it is alleged that the Panchayat has not taken any follow up action in the matter. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, any action has been initiated by the Panchayat, it is up to the Panchayat to take necessary follow up action. In view of the compliant that proceedings are not concluded, I direct the first respondent to initiate further action, if any such action is warranted. This shall be done expeditiously. It is clarified that this court has not expressed anything on the case set up by the petitioner and it is entirely for the first respondent to deal with the matter in accordance with law and that too with notice to the parties. WPC.No.37688 /09 :2 : Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a coy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/