IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 7561 of 2008 Between: U.V.S. Prasad S/o. U.A. Padmanabha Rao O/o. Directorate of Adul Education, A.P., Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 K. Viswanadham S/o. Late Narasimha Murthy, O/o. Dy. Director of Adult Education, Hyderabad. 2 Director of Adult Education, A.P., Hyderbad. 3 The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government (SSA) Education (SE) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari after calling for the records relating to the order dated 23.08.2007 made in O.A.4942/2007 on the file of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SURENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. ASHOK KUMAR W.P. No. 7561 of 2008 O R D E R: (Per THE HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) The present writ petition is filed against the order dated 23.8.2007 passed in O.A. No. 4942 of 2007 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. The 1st respondent herein filed the said O.A. before the Tribunal seeking to set aside the Proceedings Rc.No.7096/E1/DAE/06-1 dated 18.8.2007 issued by the Director of Adult Education, A.P., Hyderabad as illegal ad arbitrary. Having noticed the fact that the 1st respondent herein was not put on notice before passing the impugned order therein, the Tribunal stayed the impugned proceedings therein for a period of 14 days. In view of the fact that this writ petition is filed against the interim order of staying the proceedings dated 18.8.2007 only for a period of 14 days and the matter is pending before the Tribunal, we do not want to go into the merits of the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, liable to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner can agitate his rights before the Tribunal in accordance with law. T. MEENA KUMARI, J. S. ASHOK KUMAR, J. Date: 15-04-2008.