IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4405 of 2010 JAMUNA RAI & ORS. Versus JAI GOBIND RAI & ORS. ----------- 2. 9.3.2011. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. By order dated 21.7.2010 passed in C.R.No.562 of 2008, the petitioner was permitted to convert the civil revision application to a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India subject to fulfillment of other conditions within a period of four weeks from the date of the order failing, which the application shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. It so appears that although some steps were taken by the petitioner towards the compliance of the directions of this Court but as the peremptory order was not fully complied, the civil revision application stood dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of Stamp Reporting some more defects were pointed out by the office and non-compliance 2 whereof has resulted in dismissal of the application on 18.8.2010. He submits that the defects however stood rectified by 20th August, 2010. He thus submits that the defects having been removed on 20.8.2010 and the directions having been complied with fully, the Civil Revision application may be restored. Regard being had to the submissions of the learned counsel and the statements made in the restoration application, the restoration application is allowed and C.R.No.562 of 2008 is restored to its original file. The peremptory period mentioned in the order dated 21.7.2010 stands extended until 20.8.2010. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)