1 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1198/2004 Smt. Kamla. vs. Babulal. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1198/2004 Smt. Kamla. vs. Babulal. Date : 8.9.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sandeep Saruparia, for the appellant. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the appellant. As per the facts mentioned in the impugned order dated 25.2.2004, the application for custody of child Roshan Lal was filed by the appellant in the trial court which appears to be in the year 1998. At that time, the child was of the age of 7 years. More than 10 years have passed to that and, therefore, the child is of the age of more than 17 years. The appellant's application for custody was dismissed by the trial court on 25.2.2004. This appeal was filed on 25.5.2004 and the sole respondent has yet not been served. In view of the above, it appears that the claim 2 S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1198/2004 Smt. Kamla. vs. Babulal. petition itself has become infructuous and consequently, this appeal deserves to be dismissed, hence, dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya