- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.599 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.599 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.599 OF 2003 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER ST.NO.16274 OF 2003 FROM ORDER ST.NO.16274 OF 2003 FROM ORDER ST.NO.16274 OF 2003 Deepak Banwarilal Saraf & anr. ...Appellants Vs. Smt.Bimla Banwarilal Saraf & Ors. ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2005. : FEBRUARY 15, 2005. : FEBRUARY 15, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By order dated 11th February 2004 the Applicants were directed to supply full and correct address of Respondent Nos.1 and 3. On 14th January 2005 I granted two weeks’ time to the Applicants. Till today correct address of Respondent Nos.1 and 3 is not furnished. None appears for the Applicants when the Application is called out. Hence, in view of non compliance of the order dated 11th February 2004, Civil Application is dismissed for want of prosecution as against Respondent Nos.1 and 3. The Respondent Nos.1 and 3 are original Defendants in the Trial Court. The order impugned in the Appeal is passed in favour of the Respondent Nos.1 and 3 also. 2. In view of this position, Appeal from Order and Application for condonation of delay cannot survive. Accordingly, Civil Application is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.