IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2010 / 14TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2516 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.500/2006 OF VADANAPPALLY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT) ............ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 7,8 & 10: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. ANIL KUMAR, S/O SADANANDAN, AGED 32 YEARS, KUNNATH HOUSE, ETHAI CENTRE, ENGANDIYOOR, THRISSUR. 2. AZEEZ, S/O ABU, AGED 48 YEARS, VALIYAKATH HOUSE, POLAIKKAL DESOM, C ENGANDIYOOR, THRISSUR. 3. SHABEER @ SHEBIN, S/O ASHRAF, VALIYAKATH HOUSE, POLAIKKAL DESOM, ENGANDIYOOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IRINJALAKKUDA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALAPPAD. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 2516 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 5th August, 2010 ORDER In this petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that they are sought to be arrested by Vadanappally police in connection with Crime No. 500n of 2006 registered for offences punishable under Sec.302 I.P.C. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that grave offences are involved, anticipatory bail cannot be granted to the petitioners . There is no reason why they should not approach the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail after their arrest. This Petition is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 5th day of August, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) Bail A.No. -:2:- ani.