^ ©\\v8 HIGH COUOT' 08 CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASRUR SinaieBench : Hori'Ma Shri DiUn Ra<»ahel>Deslflnalth. J.'' ABpeilants Defendants Second Aooeat No^62C008 , .^.~^.:'—-'-1 1. Gulab, S/o Bhagwatiya Agteiriya, Aged about 45 years, R/o Semra Pafi,Tah8ii Sarangarh,pstrictRaig3ri-i{C,G,)i:; 2. Bh^watiya S/o Shivlal Agbariya, Aged about 65 years, R/o Village Semra Pali, Tahsil Sarangarii.Distnct Raigarh (C.S^ Versus . , - - . ui 1. Smt. Namita Wd/o Late ©autam Aghariip, Aged ,at?out;sa3 yeai^ R/o~? Semra Rali Afc (itesent- Rto Naweidih, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2. Minor Neha Kumari, D/o Late Goutam Aghariya, Aged about 4 years,.,Throi®h mother namety Smt. Namite Wd/o Late Gautam Aghariya, R/o Semra Pali At present R/o Nawadih, Tahsil Sarar^aift, District Raigarh (CG.) - ^ Second Appeal under Sectton 100 ofthe Gode of CivU Procedure. Respondents Plaintifls Present :- Shri S. K. Dadsena, counsel for the appellants. ORALORIffiR (Passed on Vtus 1"' day of October, 2008) Learned counsel for the appellants sought peimission to wjthdraw this appeal on the ground that since a decree for Rs.17,750/- has been passed against the appellantsftlefendants by the lower appellate Court, second appeat is not malntainabte and only revision woutd lie. Therdore.he would preTer civit reviston. • ' (2) Reserving the liberty to Uie appellants/defendants to prefer civil revision, this seoond appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copy af the impugned judgment and decree be retumed to the learned counset tor the appellante 6n furnishing xerox copy thereof. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Jndge Tunreine L