_.:P. [s1 No.6896lzoos DJ S1 01 D1 y6 PETITIONER I 1. ‘. Nanda Sahu, age about 48 years, W/o m' Vijay Kumar Sahu, Ayurvedic Medical flcer, Raipur, Distt—Raipur (CG) ‘. Sant'Prakash Indurkcr, agc about 59 hrs, S/o late Shn' Das Rao Indurker Aynvedic Medical OEcer, Raipur, Distt- Ra‘dpur (CG) Dr. Surendra Chandrakar age about 46 years, S/o‘ Shn Ramkisilan, Ayurvedic Medical (Homoeopathic) Oflcer Raipur, Dist:Raipur (CG) i Vs State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through- The Secretary Health 6a Family Welfare Department, D,K.S. Bhawan, Distt. — Raipur (CG) RESPONDENTS 2. O$cer, District Ayurved DisttRaipur (CG) X 226 of Constitution of India) Raipur, (Petition U f} Single Bench; Hon’ble Mr 10.12.2008 Shri Ajay Shn'vastav Shn' Amrito Das, PaJ Heani. working under the respondents in different The petitioners are ’o advance increments for undergoing family : fixation of salaiy rules of Annexure P-l. However, while iixing their salary as per recommendation of 5th Pay Commission, the two advance increments already given to the petitioners, have not been . Justice Dhirendra Mishra a, counsel for the petitioners. 1el Lawyer for the State. otiices. They were given tw planning operation as’ pe: taken into consideration. \\.€‘ ' Learned counsel for tba petitionErs submits that the issue involved m mis matter has been iinally sattled by the Madhya Pradash Administrativs Tribunal vide Omar dated 20th February 2001 passed in Original Application No. 1007/ 1999 in the matter of Jawahar Singh Vs‘ State of MP‘ & athers . He further submits that he is not pressing this petitian at this stage, however, he prays for liberty to the petiu'oners to nle suitable representations before the respondent No. 1 for redressal of above grievances, who may be further directed to decide the same Within the specified period in the lights of the judgment in the matter Jawahar Singh Vs. Siate of MP & others (supra). On the other hand, leamed counsel for the State submits that if thevpetitioners hie fresh representations before the respondent No.1 for redressal of above grievances Within a period of one week from today along with copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent No.1, in ticcordance with law, within a further period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. In View of the above submission of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh replesentations before the respondent No. 1 for redressal of above grievances, within a period of one week from today along with copy of this order. On such representations being made, the respondent No. l shall decide the same within a period of 8 weeks from the date/of receipt of the representations in accordance with law. pjr// sdl‘ "Shra // Jo‘Xge [‘13W / / / / s ‘ Dh'xrwdraw