IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 18 OF 1999 MORTULO RAMCHANDRA GAD AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. JOHN PINTO (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondents Ms. S. Mordekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms. S. Mandrekar, Advocate for the Respondent no.3. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 7th July, 2009 P.C. The Counsel on behalf of the Applicants states that the Applicants do not wish to serve respondent no.2 as respondent no.2 had expired before the judgment was passed by the Trial Court. Consequently his name shall stands deleted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Respondent no.1(a) is stated to have been served. None appeared on her behalf. Respondent no.3 is represented by Advocate Ms. S. Mandrekar. Ms. Mandrekar states that respondent no.3 has no objection in case the bank guarantee is released in favour of the Applicants. Consequently, the application is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) and the Applicants are held entitled to get the bank guarantee released from State Bank of India, Bicholim Branch. Application disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. at*