^.^^•: ^ •l.!h;.i;i MJGHGOyRTQFCMHATTISGARHATBILASPUR ~1~ DIVISIONBENCH j dORAM: Abplicant Respondents HON'BLESHRSRAJEEVGUPTA,CJ. HON'BLESHRrSUNILKUMARSINHA,J. MCCNoAe4of201& The Qriehtal Ihsurance Company^ Through its Sr Diyisional IVIanager, 'Bilaspur,.G.G.'''.-1'^ VERSUS :i - / . ' -• : ~ • : '•' • '.": Smt Kumari Bai, | w/o iate Sukald Ram Dhurandhar, j aged about 46 yeaTS "•:!/ iVlol'ian Lai, S/o l^te Sukalu •Ram" DhurandharAged about27years Both R?o isjandofri, PQ and PS Kumharj, district Dyrg Shyam Sunder j Dewangan, S/o Jhaduram Dewan^an, R/o Gram - ChaFoda Basti, RO ,Janjgiri BSY District-Durg,CG| ADDlicationforresforatJGn Present: ShriG.S. Patel,counsel^M '•GRDER-^::--'.:!.. .s'';' .•-.^ {15th November, 2010) The foliowing order of fhe Court] was passed by RajeevGupta,C.;J. Shri G^. Patel, leamedcoynsel fbrthe petitibnerisheardon the restoratibn petition. ! >bu 2) Thepetitioner isseeking restoration of IVI.A. No. 490 of 2001,. which was dismissed fbr want pf prosecutionl vide order dated 24.06.2010. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of iearned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petition; we are satisfied that the absence Qf the petitioner's/appellant's counsei on 24.06.2010, when M.A. No.490/2001 was taken-up for hearing, was based on jbona ffcte grounds; ; 4). iVI.C.C.No.464/2010, therefore, is i aliowed and M.A.No.490/2001 Ss restored to its original number. ^ Sd/- Chief Justice Sunil Kumar Sinha ^.