IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2011 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 12846 of 2011(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MARIAMMA C., SUBIBHAVAN T.C. 3/2042, LIC A LINE, L-15, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4, NOW WORKING AS HSA, SOCIAL STUDIES, ST.MARY'S HSS, PATTOM. BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 4. CORPORATE MANAGER, MSC CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, MSC SCHOOLS, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004. 5. THOMAS P.JOHN, HSST (JUNIOR HISTORY), ST.MARY'S HSS KIZHAKKEKARA, KOTTARAKKARA-691506. 6. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE for R1 TO R3 AND R6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.12846/2011-E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 24th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who is working as H.S.A Social Studies at St.Mary's Higher Secondary School, Pattom of which the fourth respondent is the Corporate Manager is aggrieved by the denial of appointment as H.S.S.T (History) in the vacancy which arose in the year 2007-08. The Management appointed the fifth respondent, and the petitioner had raised objections before the Management as well as before the Director of Higher Secondary Education as evident from the pleadings. Finally, the petitioner had approached Minister of Education also as evident from Ext.P11 representation. It is dated 14/05/2010. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the denial of the appointment of the petitioner is not justified. It is also submitted that the Regional Director of Higher Secondary, the third respondent, has already approved the appointment of the fifth respondent. If that be so, the petitioner will have to challenge the order before the Government by filing appropriate representation. W.P.(C). No.12846/2011 -:2:- 3. Therefore, if the petitioner files an appropriate representation before the first respondent, the same will be considered along with Ext.P11 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the representation and appropriate decision will be taken by the Government after hearing the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 and 5. The petitioner will also produce a copy of the writ petition and a copy of the Judgment along with the representation before the first respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE