IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2254 of 2004 NAYEEM ALAM son of Jamil Ahmad, resident of village Areraj, P.O. Areraj, Dist. East Champaran, Motihari....Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. District Officer Motihari, Eist. East Champaran. 3. District Eduction Officer, Motihari, Dist. East Champaran. 4. Regional Education Officer, Motihari, Dist. East Champapran. 5. Block Development Officer, Areraj, Dist. East Champaran. 6. Block Education Extension Officer, Areraj, Dist. East Champaran. 7. Primary Urdu Balak Vidyalaya, Areraj, through its Head Master, Dist. East Champaran. 8. Anil Kumar, Chairman, Primary Urdu Balak Vidyalaya, Areraj, Dist. East Champaran ...Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner: None For the State : Miss Maniisha Singh, A.C to G.A.-1. 3 23.02.2011 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this application though, learned A.C. to G.A. 1 is present on behalf of the State and its officials. From the perusal of the pleadings it appears that petitioner has approached this court by filing the present writ application seeking a direction upon the respondents restraining them from making construction of Primary Urdu Balak Vidyalaya, Areraj in the district of East Champaran. A counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent District Superintendent of Education, Motihari, wherein in paragraph -7 it has been stated that the building for the school in question has already been constructed over a piece of land donated by one Anil Kumar and the school is running in that building. The facts stated in the counter affidavit have not been disputed by the petitioner by filing any rejoinder. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present 2 petition has become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed. M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )