IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 527 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 24th August, 2009. Geetu Dass Petitioner through Mr. R.A.Sheoran, Advocate Versus Smt. Daya Kumari Gupta. Respondent through Mr. A.K.Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed by the petitioner – tenant who has been ordered to be evicted from House No. 2291/1, Sector 40-C, Chandigarh by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh vide the order dated 14.11.2008 in an eviction petition filed under Section 13- A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. During the course of hearing, the petitioner, who is present in person, has made a statement on oath that she does not want to press this petition if six months' time is granted to her to vacate the premises in dispute. She has also undertaken to pay the arrears of rent @ Rs.1800/- per month w.e.f. March, 2008 onwards as also the future rent till she vacates the premises. Learned counsel for the respondent – landlord has also no objection to the grant of the afore-stated period. In view of the agreed stand taken by the parties, this revision petition is disposed of as having not been pressed with a direction that the petitioner shall hand-over the vacant possession of the premises in dispute to the respondent – landlord on or before 28.02.2010. Further, the petitioner, as per her undertaking, shall pay the arrears of rent @ Rs.1800/- per month with effect from March, 2008 onwards by way of Demand Draft within a period of two months from today. The petitioner shall also continue to pay the future rent by the 10th day of each calendar month till she vacates the premises in dispute. Disposed of. Dasti. August 24, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE