1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (o) NO. 1024/2009 IN M.C.A. St.No. 15903/2009 in W.P. NO. 1765/88 Ramdayal Ayoudhyaprasad Gupta through L.Rs vs. State of Maharashtra and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Mr. Anand Parchure, Counsel for Applicant Mr. N.S.Khubalkar, AGP for Respondent NO.1 C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 8th JUNE, 2010. Heard. 2) By the present Civil Application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 6 years and 7 days in seeking to file review/recall of the application. 3) It is unfortunate, the very application is lacking demonstration of the sufficient cause and ground seeking discretion of this Court. It is not clear, reading the application as a whole, as to how after the death of Ramdayal Gupta on 22.2.1997 or thereafter, they could not keep track of the matter. Even if they learnt of the matter in September, 2009 from the neighbours, 2 however, that is also not clearly spelt out in the application. The applicant claims to be widow and mother of two minor children and submits that she had no knowledge about the matter. It is not that the court expect minute explanation of day to day delay or activities, however, some indication should be placed why for six years, petitioner did not keep track of the matter. The laxity shown by the applicant cannot and need not be encouraged. No merits. The application dismissed. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit