WA 960/11 16.11.2011 We have heard both sides and have gone through the impugned order of the learned single Judge dated 29.8.11. The petitioner/appellant who retired from service on 31.5.06 had filed the Writ Petition in the year 2011, claiming the benefits which were aleady awarded to the similarly situate employees by this Court in the year 2008. It has been found by the learned single Judge that the appellant was waiting and watching the out come of the cases instituted by other employees and only when the other employees had succeeded, the appellant had filed the writ petition before this Court. The learned single Judge has relied upon the decisions of the Supreme Court to the effect that persons who sit tight over their rights and ultimately file writ petitions only when some similarly placed employees have obtained the relief from the Court, such persons are not entitled for the relief on account of delay and latches. In the circumstances, we do not find any good ground to differ with the view taken by the learned single Judge. The appeal is dismissed. (Sushil Harkauli) (Alok Aradhe) Acting Chief Justice Judge