IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.420 of 2007 YATINDRA PRASAD SINGH @ JITENDRA SINGH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 26.2.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for further investigation of Shahpur ( Kashichak) P.S.Case No.38/06 under section 307 and other ancillary sections of the I.P.C. The petitioners submit that he had undergone brain surgery in the year 2004 at Delhi. He submits that in the last Panchayat election one Arjun Singh who has been elected as Mukhiya wanted to use the house of the petitioner for election purpose. The petitioner did not agree to his request. Thereafter the aforesaid Arjun Singh, Mukhiya, got annoyed and he has been perpetuating all sorts of mischiefs and highhandedness against his family members. He even got a false case instituted through one of his relatives, Manoj Kumar Singh being Kashichak P.S. Case No. 38/06 under sections 307,379 and 504/34 of I.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioners asserts that in the aforesaid case he has been implicated alongwith his son, Pankaj Kumar and one Shambhu Singh son of Late Jagdish Singh. He submits that on account of brain surgery he is generally confined to his house and he is not in a position to take part in any such occurrence. His grievance is that police without considering all these aspects has submitted charge sheet in a most mechanical manner, as such he prays further investigation. 2 Learned counsel for the State submits that the police has submitted charge sheet in the cases instituted by both sides and as such it has acted fairly. The petitioner further submits that he has made complaint against some of the police officials. In the circumstances, if he files application before the S.P. Nawada he will examine the same. This writ application is disposed of with liberty to take all these points before the court below which will be disposed of in accordance with law. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)