CWP No.10526 of 2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10526 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.05.2010 Dr. Kiran ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to grant her maternity leave and payment of salary in view of a Division Bench judgment of this Court in CWP No.12753 of 1999 decided on 11.4.2002. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation (Annexure P-7) to the respondents ventilating the claim as set up in the writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far. Learned counsel further states that at this stage, the petitioner shall feel satisfied in case a time-bound direction is issued to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-7). 1 CWP No.10526 of 2010.doc After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-7) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months of the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and in case, any amount is found due, the same shall be released to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter. May 28, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2