samg Mw f/C M w% ,> (4) 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w. P. (S) No. HIQ%;.../2009 (Single Bench Service Matter) PETITIONER SANAT SHARMA aed bout 44 ears I /1. g a y S/O Late Sh Shiv Kuma hana (B.C0m. a pist Hin) Asistat Grde 3 RU SHARA aged aout yers S B. M. Sarrna ‘Com., B.Ed LB.) Asst Gad 3 AN M b 49 a /o Shri h (M. ., L siant re SHA KADVE aged about 43 yes S/ hri gabar ve Higher Sedary and‘ pu Tp ss ade YEWNT ar o S Dim Kad ( con Comter yist) Aistant Gr 3 mt. DULARI HARAKAR k d ab 45 as W amkrishna Charakr / o R nda (M.. and ypist) Assn Gd 3 S CND age out yer A T istat rae ‘ ri r Sn nd Ty di sn a (5) A11 petitioners posted in Office 0f Development Commissioner Panchayat and Rural Development Department Civil Lines, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS' I 1. STATE OF CHHITTISGARH Through : Principal Secretary F0rest‘ Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Secretariat D. K. S. Bhawan, ‘G. E. Road, ~ Raipur (CG) CHIEF CONSERVATOR 01: FOREST Govt. of Chhattisgarh Aranya Bhawan, ”Medical College Road, Raipnr (C.G.) PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Panchayat &R1iral Depariment Govt. of Chhattisgarh Secretariat . D. K. S. Bhawan, G. E Road, Raipur (C.G.) a l ,r (6) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 ’ E CNSTITUTION“ OF INDIA 6 OF TH O HéGH COURT 0r- r§§4ATxmu§RH : giLAi’BPUR ‘WRW PET%TI6N {8‘1 NO. 41 {37 OF QGGQ {Wr§‘i Petition mdgr Amde 226 of ihe Cansiituticn af $ndéa) Séngle Bench : Hon’He Shri Sai§sh K. Agmha ya, J Presa’zt :- Sm VG. Tamaskar, counsei far the getiimmr. ‘ Sim MIPS. Bha’iia, Dy. Gcavt. Advacae {orthe Siam. uRDER {ORAL} xi asseq an this 17 day 5f {warchi 2S1G} By this gamma the pe:i€§c:ners‘ seak a directian is mg respondem authcrities to past them in 'ihe Faiest Separtmen’t on the goat 0f Aasistam @rwe — m. Learned caunsei appearing 3w the peiiéiaaerg submits i‘nat pursuan‘: to the om‘er dated 1% ‘-2G$6 {Amexure — W3} passed by me Bivésian Bench af ihis Cauri in W‘P. Nefiw a? 2863 {Shhamsgam Da§n§§i Vetan 3h0g§ van Kamachan Samm Mmtuar v 3ta€e m“ Chhatiasaarh & Qihers) am ather ccnnected matters, the get§i§mer$ were $egu§arized by Qwer c’iéied w-4-2Qi‘33 in ‘ihe Faa’est Deparimmi "fherea’fteh by arder daied '§;3-”§C>-2%308 (Amexure — PM), w§thou€ the consam cf thé gatétbnera me peéiiianers were absarbed in the office Sakieiegmeya‘t Commissioner, Chhatiisgam: Raipur, Can me pca‘t 0f Assistam Giade - Hi an me gmuad that “mere were m sufficient sanctimed pasts avai§abie m ihe Fares% m. PETIT§GNER$ ESanat Sharma & Sibas Versus “’-‘<£SPON£§E§\§T”‘ ”aate of éhha’tiisgam 8: mhsars 'IF f , Demriment in sprite 9f avaiiabiiity of’suffMe‘nt number of sanctianed posts. Hence, this petétian. 3. Conta'adicting the cententions of the getitioners, learned cnunse§ appearing fm the State makes submissions in suppoa’t 9f the impugned action 0f the respondent authori’iies. Gn account of some ciea’ica3 mistake; "me infcrmation about the avaiiabiiity of Assistant Giade — iii poets has wrongiy been given is one Du‘shyant Haimukh as i2; under ihe Right io information Act! 2%5. However, on knewing about the said mistake the same has been feciifieoi and immediateiy cemmunicated tc the said persen nameiy; i—iarmukh. The services oi the petitioners have beer‘r absorbed in the office of Deveioomeni Commissioner, Chnei‘iisgarh, Raip’ur, on the post of Assistant Grade — iii wiih the consent oi the Beparimenis nameiy; Finance, Forest and Panchayat & Rurai Deveiopmeni. Thus, ihe peiiiioners are not eniiiieci to any reiief. 4. i have examined the rivai contentions of the iearned counsei aopearing for the panies, perused ihe pieadings and the documenis appended ihereio. The order dated 13-1 0-2668 (Annexure — P14), wherein the petitioners have been sent i0 ihe office of Deveiopment Commissioner, Chhatiisgerh, Raiour, which is not a pan of Forest Bepartmeni, was passed wiihout consent, of the peiitioners, ihough the \ consent of the Forest Depariment was obtained. if the services oi he netitioners have been reguiarized in the t Gowri Haas: Eepadment? w§thaut may 65E$eni they cannot be sent t0 any ather Department for abscrpimn. Thus: the afaresiated ac$ion taken by the respondent authcrmes is unconsiwtianai. For the reasons meniéoned hereinabove, ihe W¥§t pet§tien is a§£owed. The pEtitioners are enéMéd m continue an the pas: of Assistant Grade -— HI én the Farest Deparimeni. However, eeving regard to ihe facts siiuation a? {he case, it is epen €o the respandent authorities i9 take approwiate steps: if ee advised, in accordance with §aw. There wm be no order aeto costs: p3 ¥ /