1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (S) NO. 693/2011 &C.A.(ST) NO. 13680/2011 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 13679/2011 (Smt. Satyabhama wd/o Laltaprasad Tripathi vs. Shri Laxman Ashtikar ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Rudved Dhore, Adv. for appellant/applicant CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI,J. DATED : 16th August,2011. Heard. There is delay of 104 days in filing the Second Appeal. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the respondent-sole. On 9.8.2009, the learned counsel for the appellant has sought the order of status quo on the ground that there was likelihood of of respondent taking possession. Accordingly, this Court had directed the parties to maintain status quo. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the delay was already condoned by earlier order. However, that is not correct. For the reasons stated in the application which are good and sufficient, the delay of 104 days in filing the Second Appeal is condoned, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the respondent. Civil Application is disposed of. Interim order to continue. Issue fresh notice on stay application, returnable after four weeks. Service in addition by RPAD is permitted. JUDGE sahare