IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24471 of 2010 INAMUL HAQUE @ MD.ENAMUL HAQUE, SON OF MD. AMJAD ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MATHORTOLA, RAJABARI POLICE STATION- KASBA, DISTRICT- PURNEA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.07.2010. It is submitted by the counsel for the informant that Sessions Trial No. 884 of 2008, arising out of Kasba P.S.Case No. 99 of 2007 could not be disposed of by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Purnea within the time granted by this Court under order dated 6.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42589 of 2009, as the court was without a Presiding Officer. It is also submitted that now the Presiding Officer has taken over and he may be directed to comply the orders of this Court dated 6.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42589 of 2009. Let the Presiding Officer, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C-V, Purnea comply the orders of this Court dated 6.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42589 of 2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if the trial is not disposed of within the said time then consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail. From perusal of the order of the trial court dated 8.5.2010 it appears that the trial court was of the opinion that petitioner made wrong submission during the hearing of Cr. Misc. No. 42589 of 2009 on 6.4.2010 as it was submitted before this Court on that day that the case has been fixed for argument tomorrow. Such submission was made by the learned counsel for the informant as the prosecution evidence having been closed, accused examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and defence evidence also closed, argument was fixed for 2.6.2009 and since then it was being adjourned. - 2 - The trial court, in consideration of the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, should not have observed that counsel for the petitioner made wrong submission before this Court on 6.4.2010. Instead of making such observation the trial court should proceed to comply with the direction of this Court contained in order dated 6.4.2010. With the aforesaid observation the application is disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the trial court through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)