1 ndm 18 revn.102.08 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 102 OF 2008 Sambhaji Namdeo Sawant. ... APPLICANT Vs. Santosh Laxman Patil and ors. ... RESPONDENTS ­­­­­­­­ Mr. Vijay Killedar for Applicant. Mr. K.S. Patil for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Pratap Patil for Respondent No. 3. Mr. D.R. More, APP for State. ­­­­­­­­ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 01 st April, 2010. P.C. 1 The present revision is challenging the order passed by the learned Ad­hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur dated 29 th May, 2007 in Sessions Case No. 9 of 2006, to the extent it acquits accused No.3. 2 The accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 were charged with the offence punishable under Section 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused Nos. 1 and 2 were convicted for the said offence and 2 sentenced to suffer R.I. for five years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/­ each. However, accused No.3 came to be acquitted. The only allegation against the accused No.3 was that the accused Nos. 1 and 2 had assaulted the victim at the instance of accused No.3, who was having civil dispute with the victim. 3 The learned trial Court has come to a conclusion that insofar as the allegation of criminal conspiracy is concerned, there was nothing except the bare word of the complainant to implicate the accused No.3. 4 In that view of the matter, no perversity is noticed to warrant interference. Hence rejected. [ B.R. GAVAI, J ]