IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION RDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2006. Daryus Panthaky ..Petitioner versus M.C.G.B. & Others ..Respondents Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr. Vinod Thakker for the Petitioner Mrs. A.K.Savla for the Respondents Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. S.R.Sathe, JJ. Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 Dated : 8th Sept, 2006 P.C. 1. This is nothing but a fishing expedition on the part of the petitioner. The petitioner has to make an application for specific documents and not a roving inquiry. If any of the documents specifically mentioned by the petitioner are available with the respondents, the respondents to furnish the same within four weeks from today or intimate to the petitioner that the information is not available and or to pass appropriate orders, which the petitioner can take up in appeal, if the petitioner is still aggrieved. 2. In so far as the missing files are concerned, the learned Counsel for the respondent points out that the Municipal Commissioner has initiated an inquiry. The steps taken pursuant to the preliminary inquiry, by the Municipal Commissioner be placed before this Court. We grant six weeks time to take the decision. 3. With the above observations, the petition is disposed off. Needless to say that the fees for the documents will be in terms of rules which are in force. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (S.R.SATHE, J.) (S.R.SATHE, J.) (S.R.SATHE, J.)