{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.204 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9017 OF 2010 Sk. Mehmood s/o Sk. Dadamiya Applicant Versus Mirza Anwarali s/o Rahimatali & others Respondents Mr. T.G.Gaikwad, advocate for applicant. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 22 nd November, 2010 PER COURT: 1 This is an application seeking review of the order passed by this Court on 30th September 2010 in Writ Petition No. 9017 of 2010. 2 The issue raised in the petition is in respect of grant of injunction during continuance of the suit. Considering the aspect that both the Courts have concurrently decided the application, thereby clamping an order of injunction against defendant- petitioner herein. This Court did not deem it appropriate to cause any interference in the petition. While disposing of the writ petition, the trial Court was directed to decide the suit expeditiously. {2} 3 On perusal of the application as well as order passed by this Court, I am of the considered view that the order passed by this Court earlier does not call for any interference. 4 Learned Counsel appearing for review petitioner states that the matter is at the stage of recording of evidence and the trial Court has already framed issues. This Court, while disposing of the writ petition on 30th September, 2010, has directed the trial Court to decide the suit expeditiously. It is expected of the trial Court to observe the directions issued by this Court. The petitioner shall have a liberty to tender appropriate application to the trial Court urging early disposal of the pending suit and the trial Court would surely consider such a request, if made and would proceed to decide the suit at the earliest. 5 Review Application stands rejected. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/ra20410