r^\^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIV1SIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV©UPTA,GJ.& HON*BLE SHRISUNtL KUMARSINHA,J. PETITJONER Wrtt Petitton No. 8473 of 2TOS Krishnakant Gupte, aged about 44 yre, S/o. Govind Prasad Gupta, R/o. Village Sitapur, Tah. Sitapur, Distt, - Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Versus 1. Stete of Chhattisgarh, Through: Transport Commissioner, Raipur DistrietRaipur(C.G.) 2. ColleGtor.Ambikapur, Suiguja Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3. R.T.A. Ambitepur, Distt. Surguja 4. R.T.A. Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 5. R.T.A. Raigarh, Distt. Ra^arti (C.G.) 6. R.T.A. Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.Q.) 7. PubticWorteDepartmentThrough: its Executive Engineer, RaifxiF, Otett Raipur(C.G.) - 8. Publte Worles Bepartroent Through : its Engtoeer-in-Chiey, National Hjghway, Raipur, Dtstt. Raipur (C.©.) 9. Bharat Aluminum Company Limtted Through : tts Company Secretary, Balco Nagar, Korba, Distriet Korba (C.G.) ~ WritPetition UnderArtJcle 226/2270fthe Constitutron of India Present: Shri Manoj Paranjape, counsel forthe peUtioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State / respondents No.1 to 8. Shri Prashant Mishra, SeniorAdvocate wlth ShriAjay Mishra, coynsel for r^pondent No.9. ORDER ^thApril,2808) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Manoj Paranjape, learned counsel for the petltioner in vlew of the facts narrated in the counter affidavit flled on behalf of the State seeks permission to withdrawthe writ pet'rtion w'rth the liberty of filing another writ petition, if the future developments so warrant. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above liberty, the writ petition 1s dlsmissed as wlthdrawn. 4) Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.4^1/^)05 ateo stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SunilKumarSmha Judge padma