1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5578/2010 Shri Narsingh B. Khandar Vs. The Collector, Amravati and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 26, 2010. Heard Advocate Palshikar for the petitioner, Advocate Anjan De for respondents 4 and 5, and AGP Sonare for respondents 1 to 3. Advocate Palshikar sought adjournment as he received reply in the Court. In view of orders passed earlier in Writ Petition Nos. 5585/2010 and 5589/2010 his request was rejected. He has urged that Wadhona Sevaa Sahakari Society Ltd. has no representative in the final voters list and name of respondents 4 and 5 could not have been added as representative there of in exercise of Rule 5 Sub Rule 2 of Maharashtra Specified Cooperative Societies Election to Committees Rules, 1971 2 (hereinafter referred as “the Rules”). Advocate De for respondents 4 and 5 has supported the impugned order by inviting attention to provisions of Rule 6 sub-Rules (5) to (7) of Rules. Learned AGP is also supporting the impugned order. Identical controversy is decided by me in above two writ petitions. In view of the reasons recorded therein with same liberty to the petitioner, present writ petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE ambulkar