IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23902 of 2010 1. SONELAL MAHTO SON OF LATE JAGDISH MAHTO 2. MANGAL MAHTO SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the State and the informant. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is that they were previous father-in-law and his Samdhi, who were aggrieved with the deceased since he had remarried and therefore had taken him and thereafter his dead body was found. The further submission is that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and at best it could be a case of having been last seen with the deceased. In view of such, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 5.4.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Korha P.S.case No.60 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive - 2 - the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )