IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RFA No.4020 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.9.2008. State of Haryana and another ....Appellants Versus Smt. Satyadevi ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.Narender Sura, AAG Haryana. Mr. YD Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent. RAJESH BINDAL, J. **** Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that in view of judgment of this Court in RFA No.2501 of 2008 decided on 3.5.2008 Ved Pal Vs. State of Haryana, where the compensation payable to the landowners was further enhanced and the appeals filed by the State were dismissed, the claim made in the present appeal does not survive. For the reasons stated in Ved Pal's case (supra), there is no merit in the main appeal. The appeal as well as application for condonation of delay are dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) Sept. 30, 2008. JUDGE Reema