THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3077 of 2010 ORDER: M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited issued a notification inviting applications for appointment of distributors for LPG at Bobbili. The petitioner and several others applied for the same. The applications were processed and the candidates were interviewed. Based on the consideration of applications and the assessment at the interview, the respondents placed the petitioner at position No.1. However, according to the petitioner, through letter, dated 28.01.2009, the respondents cancelled his position. It was stated that the experience certificate dated 31.03.2002 issued in favour of the petitioner by M/s. ABC Bearings Limited was found to be not genuine. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the proceedings dated 28.01.2009. He contends that the letter, dated 28.11.2008 addressed by M/s. ABC Bearings Limited was issued without verification of facts and as recently as 18.02.2009 it has issued a certificate certifying his service as genuine. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent-Corporation. The position accorded to the petitioner in the course of selection of distributors was cancelled on the basis of the communication, dated 28.11.2008 received from M/s. ABC Bearings Limited. The petitioner filed a service certificate dated 31.03.2002 to the effect that he was employed with the said organization from 2.01.2001 to 31.03.2002. However, through letter dated 28.11.2009 M/s. ABC Bearings Limited informed that the petitioner was not employed with them, this in turn, lead to issuance of impugned proceedings. The occasion to issue show cause notice to the petitioner virtually did not arise. Even now the petitioner is not able to show as to how the communication dated 28.11.2008 is improper or incorrect. The only way through which the petitioner can overcome the consequences of the letter is by obtaining another letter contradicting the one issued on 28.11.2008. The certificate dated 18.02.2009 filed by the petitioner does not refer to the letter dated 28.11.2008. In this scenario, the impugned proceedings cannot be interfered with. However, in case, the petitioner is able to obtain necessary communication from his employer, it shall be open to him to make a representation to the respondents. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it shall be open to the petitioner to make a representation to the first respondent, in case he obtains a communication from M/s. ABC Bearings Limited to the effect that the letter dated 28.11.2008 issued by them is without any basis. As and when such representation is received, the first respondent shall consider the same on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 16th February, 2010 Js.