COURT OF CHI .RH: ^ li Petitioner Wril Permanand Raiwade. S;o. Late Kisun Ram. aaed about 32 '/ears, casie - Raiwade. R/o. \/:;i.^,~^, [^.-i^^^.-s^.^^j.: T^^t;^.,-; e^*—:.-:,";" T--i?~.~;! VHstSL.iS; E~'^ijijs SttUi.Sistl F^U!iL;ti OLi.Si.iUi ! Ot i Cii iS'.s Baikunthpi-ir, District Korea (CG'). 1i State of Chhattisaarh, throuah Secretarv, Panchavat Depar'ment, D.K.S. Bhawan. -^.«.,:—;,..//^,/~<', "^.iriipUl '•^'•^Sj. ^l '^oliector. Korea, Distrlct Korea (CG). Deputy Direotor, Panchayat and Sociai Weifare Department, Korea, District Korea (CG). 4; Sub Divlsionai Officer (Revenue) Sslkunthpur; Di^rlct KQFSS (CG). 5) •Chief ExecLitivs Offioer, Janpad Panchayat; Baikunthpur, District Korea (CG). Sarpanch, Gram Pancnavat - Basti, Janpaa Psnohayst — BsikunthDUf, Dtstflct Korss ^f (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of Inaia.) S: Hon'bls Mt. K. Agnihotri, J. Present; Smt. Meena Shsstri. counse! forthe petitioner. Shri SaSish Gupta. Govt. Advooate for the resoondents No. 1 to 4/siaiaie. Shri U.N.S. Deo. counse! forthe responcient No.o. Shrl Rsvlndrs Acifswsl, counssl for the rssDQnc';9nt Nc.6. on 27"' 2008 ) With consent of learned counsel appearing for the part'iss, the matter is heard finallv. 2) By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 5-11 -2006 (Annexure P/4), Vi<hereby t'ne petitioner has been removed from the post 01 Panchayat Karmi (Secretar/). 3) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that ths petittonsr was not anbroed an opportunitv of hearing and Ruie 7 of the Panchayat Ssivice -2. '-l^''•^'^[ ^ ^•••'SL >? A ?^?^-'^a^s-^ ^^ i 11 ^^ '; 000 J''F<^L^ -"'J^ .^*i'•¥T' -~'^F^\ C^/^ lf^"^.^~ '^ ^-l^C^ . ?~'^^>l ^ ^**.^" ^. l^^L^t. ^ii=wi!w;^r;S Qa r\pp331) rtUSSS ; yyy 'ior snor1.. uis ^u;?:;s ", 'v^'^} nss FiOi DSSH i^ri?'VT;i!fSn JiA/!'";"l s^ '^'-!"r'ffi!f ^)nf^ tS.i'^!?'!'" \jTj'i 't ikJiiCU Wii.' i ii j Wt.t.C^ CSi iU teyii iL -'r^ii^ ^/hi7^l"'^^ i-:-^'^'?''^^'^^'^ ^tf^? E^C'?*/**^? ^^ r-^'^t^.'1^ ^?'^'F-^I 'WIA ^ ^"^.^. ^^Tt^-^*»/^t•^r^^-^'^?^'.'"' ^^L ?^.T'^^:d' '^L'~;^S'r ^*: ?^"*!/-^. i-} r'sr conxrg, issmsc ocunsSi spcssfinc Tor THS fssDOHQsniLS suomiT THST noisc^ wss <3^sn to ths .pstitionsr sna th^rssftsr ^solv to ths notlcs hss &ssn fliSd ov fhs Detirionsr. 5) Bs that as it may, the fsctua) 'nstrix or ths cass cannct bs examined under extraoreiinaw junsdiction cf Hiah Court in a oetition nieci undsr Articls 22S of the 6) ;n order to settie The disputed racts, it is better that ihe petitioner si",culd approacn xhe aiterantive forum o{ statutow appeai pro-.'ioed under the prcvisions of Section S1 of Panohayat Raj Acshiniyam, 1933 (for shori, "Shs Adhiniyam 1993") read with Madhva Prsdesn Panchai/ats lADoeai and Revision) Ruies 19S5. beftore rushina to this Court under Article 225 of the ConsSitution. it cannot be saici that the apDeiiate SuthoriSy wiii nct iook into infrinQemer'a; OT riQhi or vioiation of DrinciDies of naturai iustice wniie consid&ring tne case of the oesitioner on facirs as weli as on law. ThuS, this Court deciines to exeroise its ciisc;'etiona"y iunsciiction in ivour cfthe oetiiioRer. Noning extraordinapy exis:s in Shis petiticn to invote sxtraortiinary |unsd;ciion ofthis Court. 7) Learned coLinsei .for the respondents rel'o on circular dated 16-3^006 (Anhsxufs R-5/1) , whsrsiH It is Oiggnv provld8d tn^t t^s ^sOiLftion pssssd by ths Gran^Panchavat is not an order, there should be a substartive ordsr for terminatir'iQ the sewices cf the Fanchayat Karmi. Ciause 6 of Annexure R-S/1 further orovides that under Section S1 of Panchayaf Rai Adhiniyam, 19S3, the aDpesl/rsvision is maintainable before the cornpsteni: authcritv statsd therein. 8) !n view of avaliabiiity of aiiersntive statutcrv 'smedy, irtis peeition is not maintainabie. it cannot be sgid tnai the aDceiiate authority wiil not look info irannosmeit o'i fionis o;~ violation OT Dr,nc,oles cff naturai lustice WRiie consiaenns tne oase of the Detltioner cn facEs as 'nev, as on !ew. Thus, this Court deciines to A^/ta''i~'i'C?a STsK <~*i.£'.r^'"'i2i';'i/^r"!Sl"'.' i[ :?''.£,/s;S'^''f'i?^'''- ir~1 y':s\ii^i'; ^f s~)'? fr".;^ i^i2.v'i?'.-^-^ffi!" •\ E rt'i'^" l r^< ??/\d'iJitey -llte LiiSU; S'i.iUl iQi V' iUfiteUi^'Uk/'; ; h': •CfVLr'yf Ui U ;£? i^t?i.UiUi iS?i . i\iyU IH it r'!'?'-st'"t"T<if'~;'sn'' csv!e:'l'c "^ TKic: !^'s?!i'ii*->'~' i'f'i '•~;\.i;~tu'i& i3v't'i'Js-'"'*''^ir*';^i''"' s'. i?'iG'"if*l-''if^'^! n? ''''l'''1^ ••-/^; (i' .!,!"3tJi<JHJiS(fV yAi&L& Kl U iii5 n-'yiiliUi's IU iijv's^rt.y teAtf'<SUiUif ;£3>V iU! ;t3Ut<JL;U; i Ui U ;ti5 Li/UUIL na.u ' nus. iHiS Dsx'iion is QiSH^sssc ori ^H©QFOUHO GT svsii^bnszv OT s;tsmst)vs statutorx remedy or aposai. However. libsrty is res&rveci to ihe oetiiioner to recourse so siiernativs otatijTorv i'oruiTi that mav be avaiiaDiS to rtim uncier tne provisions or iaw. Sdl- SatishKAgnihotn Judge ¥-