BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15726 of 2011 1. KANNAN 2. NAGARAJAN 3. DEVI 4. KUMUTHA 5. REVATHY : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.N.Sathishbabu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that on the basis of the complaint given by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ de-facto complainant, enquiry is pending and if for any reason, the petitioners are entitled for anticipatory bail, stringent condition may be imposed. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the first petitioner is the husband and the petitioners No.2 to 5 are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thanjavur daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders and the petitioners No.2 to 5 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. Sd/- 07/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, THANJAVUR. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 5. THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.43166 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15726 of 2011 NSV/12.12.11/2P/7C Date :07/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/