IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 15652 of 2008 Between: Subodh Kumar Jain S/o.R.C.Jain Comandar Works Engineers (Hills) Pithoragarh ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Union of India., rep.by its Secretary Ministry of Defence, New Delhi 2 The Engineer-in-Chief,Military Engineer Services Kashmir House,DHQ PO,New Delhi .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Order dated 15.9.2006 in OA.No.1321/2003 on the ﬁle of Hon`ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench and quash the same and pass orders to Respondents to convene a Review D.P.c. for Promotion of Executive Engineers to the post of Superintending Engineer against vacancies for the year 2001-02 following the procedure prescribed in Para (V) of O.M.No.22011/5/86-Est(D) dated 10.4.1989 as amended in O.M.No.22011/5/91(D) dated 27.3.1997 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAMABRAHMAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15652 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is ﬁled seeking to quash the order passed in O.A.No.1321 of 2003 dated 15.9.2006 on the ﬁle of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad. The petitioner, questioning the select panel dated 14.12.2001 ﬁled the above O.A. contending that he has outstanding record of service and as per DOPT OM No.22011/5/86- Est(D) dated 10.4.1989 as amended vide O.M.No.22011/5/91- Est(D) dated 27.3.1997, the oﬃcers who are graded as ‘outstanding’ should be placed on top of those who are graded as ‘very good’ in the select panel, but in the Department Promotional Committee held for the year 2001-2002, the same was not followed, as a consequence of which, petitioner who ought to have been placed at serial No.1, was placed at serial No.22. The Tribunal, vide impugned order dated 15.9.2006 dismissed the O.A. on the ground that the petitioner has not pointed out as to who are the other persons who have been graded ‘very good’ and placed above him and also not disclosed the source of information in regard to the gradation of other persons who were placed above him. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for respondents and perused the impugned order and other material made available on record Admittedly, petitioner has not furnished the details as to who are the persons graded as ‘outstanding’ and ‘very good’ and has not made them as parties to the O.A. In the absence of the same, the Tribunal rightly dismissed the O.A. We do not ﬁnd any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and the same does not call for any interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 19.8.2008 DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15652 of 2008 (Order of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble Mr.Justice Ghulam Mohammed) 19.8.2008