IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37535 of 2010 1. JAMUNA YADAV @ Yamuna Yadav 2. Nandu Yadav 3. Sudhir Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 01.03.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.2 inasmuch as during the pendency of the application he has been arrested. Such permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.2 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha. Snatching of ornament is said super-addition. For the incident, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that differences are otherwise. In court’s question, she is stating about torture in name of diaan for five years but earlier Khaira P.S. Case No. 22 of 2009 is filed not for Prevention of Witch Craft (Diaan) Practices Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners no. 1 and 3 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 325C of 2009 above named petitioners no. 1 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)