^ss*^ aB»^. o ^^ f7 ^TO <^^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH Writ Petition (S) ^®^\/2009 (S.B) PETITLONERS A/ ...•••"/ ^%€/ /^ ^ff ^'^'/ ' ^/ s' /.^/ ^ f:^.^^l \^>. ' • .^ K^-T^7 ^ 1. S.L Dewangan,S/o Late Sakharam, Aged about 56 years, Occupation Inspector (M), ^. R.N. Tiwari S/o Shri Shiv Prasad, aged About 55 years Occupation Inspector /3. B.S. Gaharwar S/o R.P. Singh, aged About 57 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) /4. N.P.Pandey,S/oLateJ.P.Pandey, Aged about 54 years, Occupation Sub Inspector (M) 5. B.R. Sakhare, S/o Late Shivcharan, Aged about 49 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) .6. S.K. Bhagat S/o Eknath Bhagat, aged About 52 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) , ^7. A.R.Sahu S/o Late Kaliram, aged About 52 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) /8. K.K. Mishra, S/o Shri N.K. Mishra, Aged about 47 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) ^9. T.L. Sahu S/o Late Shankar Lal, aged about 50 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) ^10. Satish Patile S/o Late ^urit Ram, aged about 29 years, Occupation - Sub Inspector (M) ,11. Jagat Singh Thakur, S/o Late Milap Singh aged about 33 years, Occupation - Inspector (M) ^'" \p RESPONDENTS /12. Lakhan Lal Verma S/o Ganga Ram, aged about 53 years, Occupation - Inspector (M) 4^ y13. T.R. SinhaS/o B.R. Sinha, aged about 60years,-Subedar(M), All petitioners working at Home Guard and Civil Defense, Mana, Raipur, District-Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS *'• 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Home Affairs, Police Dept. D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. The Secretary, Finance, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 3. The Director General of Home Guard, Head Quarters, Raipur (C.G.) ^-4. Senior Staff Officer, Home Guard, Head Quarter, Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 5. The Director, Treasury, Audit and Accounts, Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE DIRECTION (Sl OR ORDER IS). HiGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH : BiLASBJR WRiT PETiTION (S)':N0.3021 OF 2009 PETiTIONERS S.L Dewangan & Others V.ersus . - State of Chhaffisgarh & Others \^ RESPONDENTS CWrit Petltlon under ArtJcle 226/227 ofthe Constitutlon of India) Singie'Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish^K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sandeep Dubey, .Advocate for the petJtioners, Shri Y.S. Thakur. Dy. Adv. Generai with Shri N.N.'Roy, Panel LawyerfortheState. i •ORDERrORAU (Passed on thls 10tn day of Varch, 2010) 1. With the consent of learned counsei appearing for the parties, the petitlon is heard finally. 2. At the very outset, learned •counsel appearing for the petltloners •submlts that the Issue Invoived In the present petitlon is sqyarely covered by the decision of thls Court .rendered Jn Abdyi Khan & Others v. TheState of Ghhattisgarh & Others1 and'other connected matters. Learned counsei further submits that so.far as the prayer at 10.4 is concerned, the petitioners do notwantto press the said prayer ctause in this petition. 3. ' in .view 'of foregolng, learned counsei appearing for the that :except~the prayer clayse 10.4 the other issue' of tne Is squarely covered by the decision of thls Coyrt rendered in Abdv! Nawab Khan (supra), . . • . .. 4. Accordingly, the writ petltion Is ailowed in'same terms.-' The impugned order dated 24-1-2006 (Annexure - P/1) is hereby quashed. The amoynt, if any/so be pald to the petltioners- with simple Interest. However, Ilberty is reserved to the respondente, if so advised, to take appropriate steps cornplylng wlth the princlpjes of naturai'jystice in accordance with the rutes. No order astocosts. . . - ^ ^- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge WP (S) No.4563 of 2006 (decided on 7-5-2009)