In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 3314 of 2003 (O&M) Kundan Lal ..... Appellant vs Land Acquisition Collector and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. H. S. Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Navneet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The land owner has filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that the land belonging to the owners was acquired vide notification dated 30.3.1990 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') for the development and utilization of land for residential, commercial and institutional area at Rewari. The same was followed by notification under Section 6 of the Act on 27.3.1991. The Land Acquisition Collector determined the value at Rs. 1,50,000/- per acre for chahi, Rs. 1,25,000/- per acre for magda/ gair mumkin (residential), Rs. 1,00,000/- per acre for bhood, and Rs. 80,000/- per acre for gair mumkin (other) kinds of land. Aggrieved against the same, the land owners/claimants filed objections which were referred to the learned Additional District Judge, Rewari, who keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, awarded Rs. 8 lacks per acre for the acquired land situated within 100 feet of the metaled Rewari-Konsiwas Road and beyond that Rs. 5,00,000/- per acre, irrespective of the quality thereof. Learned counsel for the land owner submitted that the claim made by the land owner in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in RFA No. 3709 of 2001 –State of Haryana and another vs Surat Singh and others decided on 16.9.2008. Learned Advocate General, Haryana does not dispute this factual position. For the detailed reasons recorded in Surat Singh's case (supra), the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 4.3.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge