IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 11091 of 2009 Date of Decision: 1.4.2010. Archana Gaur --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioner was selected for the post of Math Mistress under General Category in response to the Advertisement No.6/2006 dated 20.7.2006. However, she was not appointed on account of dispute regarding the validity of the degree possessed by her. During the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has now been selected and has been appointed vide order dated 6.1.2010. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the appointment of the petitioner the only relief remains to be granted is for the deemed date of appointment on the basis of merit achieved by the petitioner in the process of selection. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to grant the notional benefit of appointment to the petitioner on the basis of her merit in the selection, though, the monitory benefit shall only be allowed from the date of appointment. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 1.4.2010. lucky