e-P \^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.SNO. Rj /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^M^ ^y AW"y ^y ; •y'' ^" ShriKrishna Prasad Kunwar, S/o. Late Shri VIshwanath, Aged about 45 years, Occupation - Upper division teacher / Education Coordinator Guluster Resource Center Bhatagaon Block Bhaiyathan, District - Sarguja, C.G. VERSUS :^l. The State of Chhattisgarh., Through the Secretary, | Aadtm Jati tatha Anusuchit Jati VIkas Vibhag, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The^Commissipper., Aadim Jati ^ ^ww^^^^^^^^^^ • ^'r^ ^»? Jati Vikas Chhattisgarii5 Raipur, District— Raipur, C.G, ^3. The Collector, Sarguja, DIstt. Sarguja, C.G. ^4. The Chief Executive Officer., Jila Panchayat and the District Project Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Ambikapur, District - Sarguja C.G. 5. The Assistant^Commiss.ioner, ^ Aadim Jati tfaS^^ ^inucliit Jati Vikas Chiiauisgarh, Raipur, District - Raipur, C.G» / / 6. The District Project Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha MissiQn, Ambikapur, District - Sarguja, C.G. 7. The Head-master, Middle School rajkishor Nagar, Bloclc •^- ^" -(^ BbJiiya than, District - Sarguja, C.G. : 1 " 8. Block education officer^ , Block Bh&iyathan^ District - Sarguja, C.G. 9, BIock Resource Co-ordinater^ Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission Block - Bhaiyathan, District - Sarguja, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^ M mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WR1T PETrfION (S) No. 81 of2010 : Shri Krishna Prasad Kunww. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofChlattis^irh & Others. Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 QfThe Con^titution OfIn^ia SB: Hon'ble Shri Satuh K. Affnihotri. J. Present: Smt RenuKochar, Advocate for the p^itioaer. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDEjR (Passed on 11th day of Janaary, 2010) 1- By tfiis p^itiott. the petitioner seetos to challaige th@ tegality and validity of Ae oider dated 25.11.2009 (Atmexure P/2) passed by tfae respondent No- 9 whereby the petitioner, woridng in Jan Shik»haKeiMlra, Bhatgaon, was directed to hattd over fhe ehai^e to one Bodhan Ram Rajvrade, and was farther directed tojoin the original place ofpostmg at Middte Sdhiool, Rajkishorenagar, Block Bhaiyathan^ District Surguja. 2. The petitioner., while wotkmg as Upper DivisiGtti Teacher wa»fcratisferr^d from Middle School, Rajkishorenagar, Block Bhaiyathan, to Mlddte School, Bliittikala, Block Ambikapur, District Sui^uja vide order dated 30.06.2009 (Amiexure P/l) issued by the Assistant Qwnmisaioner (Tribal Welfare) Amfeikapur. Accwdmg to leamed eounsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner has niade a representation on 29.07.2009 to tlie respondetit No. 8 to relieve him from Middle School RajldshQFenagar, Block Bhaiyafhan, to jom at Middle Sehool,»Bhittikala, Block Ambikapiir- 'Fhe respondent No. 9 Le. Bloek Resource Coordijiator^ Rajiv Gsmdhi Shiksha Missioii, Block Bhaiyafhaii, vide the impugiied order dated 25.11.2009 (Annexure P/2) directed the petitioner to hand over the chaige ^° to tfie Bodhan Ram Rajwade and SCTit back the petitionw to tfae ofiginal place ofposting at Middle School-, Rajkishorenagar, Block Bhaiyathan. Smt. Kochar further subxnits that once pursuant to ttie ordw dated 30.06.2009 (Amiexure P/l), the petitioner joined at Middle School, Bhitthikala^ Block Ambikapur^ thfi? petitioner camiot be sait bacfc to Middte School, RajkishQrenagar, Block Bhaiyathaii, pursuaiit to the order dated 25.11.2009 (Amiexure P/2) which was passed by Block Resource Coordinator, Jan SNksha Kendra^ Bhaiyathan. On pemsal of the pleadings and ttie documetits appended thweto.»it is not clear asto whefher after tran^er order dated 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/l), fliere was any other order passed wherein the petitioner was transferred from Middle SGhooI, Bhitthikala to Middle School, Rajkishorena^r. ()nce the order dated 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/l) has been passed by a District level officer, how can a Block level officer modilfy the same, h aot clear j&om the documents and pleadings. Shri Bliaduri, leamed counsel appemmg fbr the State does xiot controvCTt the afbresaid fact and submits that tfae order dated 30,06.2009 could have been cancelled or modified eitiier by an officer of District !@vel or any higher authority but not by any Block level officer. It is made clear that Bodhan Ram Rajvmde I^is not b^&n impleaded as party rcspondent m this petition. In view ofthe foregoiag, the petitian ig disposed ofwifh a direction to tfae Collector (Tribal Welfare) Ambilcapur to examme the grievanee of the petitioner., after aftbrding opportunity of h^aring to tke petttioner as well as Bodhan Ram Rajwade and pass appropriate oider wilhin a period c£ three weeks from tlhe date of receipt of a copy of tliis ordor. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge