THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.8517 OF 2010 Dated 16th April, 2010 Between: C.Ramanna …Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police and 2 others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.O.Manoher Reddy. Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: ----- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2, in interfering in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.3, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner, in his affidavit, specifically averred that he filed O.S.No.143 of 2003 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Kalyandurg, for permanent injunction against respondent No.3 in respect of land admeasuring Ac.6-75 cents comprised in Survey No.52/4 of Korampally Village. He further stated that the civil Court granted injunction and later on, the suit was dismissed as settled out of Court and that at the instance of respondent No.3, Crime No.57 of 2004 was registered by respondent No.2 and that the petitioner obtained bail from the Court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Anantapur. On the complaint made by respondent No.3 to respondent No.1, the latter is stated to have referred the same to respondent No.2 and the petitioner alleged that on receipt of the said complaint, respondent No.2 has been insisting on the petitioner to come over to the Police Station to settle the dispute with respondent No.3. According to the petitioner, the dispute regarding payment of compensation is subject matter of OP.No.64 of 2008 pending in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur and respondent No.2 has no power or jurisdiction to interfere in such a civil dispute. In my opinion, respondent No.1 shall look into the grievance of the petitioner. The petitioner is permitted to make a representation to respondent No.1 along with supporting material to show that respondent No.2 has been interfering in civil disputes. On receipt of such representation, respondent No.1 shall enquire into the same and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.10959 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 16th April, 2010 lur