IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.06.2008 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.16211 of 2006 (T) (O.A.No.4586 of 1995) R.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary Department of P.W. Fort St.George, Madras-9 2. Chief Engineer Highways and Rural Works Chepauk, Madras – 5 3. Chief Engineer (Highways) Rural Works and East Coast Road Guindy, Madras-25 4. Superintending Engineer (Highways) Rural roads circle No.8, Alagasan Nagar Chegalpet Chennai M.G.R. District 5. Divisional Engineer (Highways) Rural roads Divisions No.8, Natteri Krishnamachari Street Krishna Nagar, Vellore-632 001 ... Respondents This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant with all the backwages and regularise the service of the applicant with attendant benefits. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mohanamurali For Respondents : Mr.B.K.Girish Neelakantan Government Advocate O R D E R By consent of the learned counsels on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the petitioner could be permitted to make a representation to the second respondent with regard to his request for regularisation, and if the second respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, within a specified period. 4. The learned Government Advocate has submitted that as and when such a representation is made, the same would be considered and appropriate orders passed, on merits and in accordance with law, in view of the letter No. 5376/2007/gp3/dated; 8.2.2008. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to submit a representation to the second respondent who may consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, expeditiously, as submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents. With the above observations, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar lan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1. The Secretary Department of P.W. State of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Madras-9 2. The Chief Engineer Highways and Rural Works Chepauk, Madras – 5 3. The Chief Engineer (Highways) Rural Works and East Coast Road Guindy, Madras-25 4. The Superintending Engineer (Highways) Rural roads circle No.8, Alagasan Nagar Chegalpet Chennai M.G.R. District 5. The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Rural roads Divisions No.8, Natteri Krishnamachari Street Krishna Nagar, Vellore-632 001 +1cc to Govt. Pleader Sr 28496 +1cc to Mr.K.Mohanamurali, Advocate Sr 28257 NTK (CO) km/17.6. W.P.No.16211 of 2006 (T) (O.A.No.4586 of 1995) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/