IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21594 of 2007 Between: Shaik Nazeema @ Nazeen … Petitioner AND Mohd. Shafi & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : None This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21594 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari declaring the orders passed by the Hon’ble 3rd respondent dated 11.05.2007 in SR.No.9126 of 2007 directing 2nd respondent to make investigation in crime 385 of 2007 is not legal and violation of principles of natural justice, and direct to call for the records in SR.No.9126 of 2007 and crime No.385 of 2007 from the file of Hon’ble 3rd respondent Court and further direct Hon’ble 3rd respondent either to forward the private complaint in SR.No.9126 of 2007 to the 2nd respondent under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for full and proper investigation or take the private complaint on file and make an enquiry, and to separate SR.No.9126 of 2007 from crime No.385 of 2007, and pass such other order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and circumstances of the case.” When the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is therefore reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing her cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition in default, WPMP.No.28006 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 21.04.2008 ES