IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11892 of 2011 SINGASHAN SAHNI @ SAHADEV SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 3 13-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation, he was arrested by the police and subsequently, he was put on test identification parade. The petitioner was identified by informant as well as two other witnesses. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and as a matter of fact, he was arrested by the police on mere suspicion and had been kept in Hazat for two days, so the petitioner might have been shown to the witnesses prior to her test identification parade, but I am not at all convinced with the above-said submission. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 117 of 2010 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arrah (Bhojpur) stands rejected. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)