<!^ &^^ /?'=^>^ BEFORE THE HONTBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ WRITPETITION (St N0. c?3^f /2010 PETITIONERS -/ ^y^ .•• ,<^Ayy ^y^Q/ ,^w7 w(y ^- t>'^ RESPONDENTS Rajendra Singh Sikarwar, aged about 34 years, son of Shri Bheekam Singh Sikarwar, presently working as Head Constable in 13th BattaUan C.A.F. Bango Distt. Korba, attached with STF Jagdalpu^- (^G) 2. Dilip Singh aged about 34 years son of Shri Dwstrika Singh, presenfly workiag as Constable 9th Battalian Dantewada, C.A.F. B. Company, Distt. Kabeerdham (CG) 3. ^Narayanlal Kushwaha, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Jeevanlal Kushwaha, presently working as Head Constable in 9th BattaUon, C.A.F. Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, through the Chief Secretaiy, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ^... ^- 2.\ State of Madhya Pradesh through fhe Chief Secretary, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 3. The Director General of PoUce, PoUce H.Q. Raipur (CG) 4. The Director General of PoUce, PoUce H.Q. Bhopal (MP) 5. The Director General of C.G. Armed Forces, H.Q. Bhilai Distt. Durg (C^ 6. Union of India, titrough the Secretary, Mmistry of Personnel, PubUc Grievances, Khan Market, New DeUu. WRIT PETITION U/A. 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 01. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As per cause title. 02. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As per cause title. ^ 03. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THIS PETITION IS BEING MADE The petitioners through this petition are challenging -, the action on part of the Respondents whereby tfaey -HC—78 sn^rv R-fi<* wnan^twm? r ,,.0. "y' A'?/ A''l ^.\: 's'^ •<<i4ii<a<i, ®Tily'w,fn|<r)i.y^< . :..^-PCS'? Wo, ZSiSSi/ I-O *11Mdl **«*""""""""'"''"•"*•*"""•""••"••"/••••^.200 3n^?T'cpR7 ('yifg^T) TOiiw^itefan^ S.B: HON'BLE JUST1CE MR. PklTINKERDlWAKER 27-10-2010: Shri Shashank Thakur, Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panel Shri Anand Verma, coun; cdunsel for the petitioners. |-a\,vyerfortheState. i|el for respondent No. 6. timtCT'ill "WRff fl ft^ <R|<<;1< •^aifinsiitn ;ounsel for the petitioners submits that withcjraw the present petition with liberty to the competent authorities. After arguing at fength, he may be permitted to file fresh representation befor^ Permission granted. Accordingly, the petiticti is dismissed as withdrawn with the as aforesaid. Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge