IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10750 of 2009 PRABHAT KUMAR BHASKAR, Son of Late Umesh Prasad Yadav, resident of village – Paruhar, P.S. + Block – Nauhatta, District – Saharsa. …. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Saharsa. 5. The Sub-divisional Officer, Sadar Saharsa. 6. The District Education Officer, Saharsa. 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Saharsa. 8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Nauhatta, District – Saharsa. 9. The Block Development Officer, Nauhatta, District – Saharsa. 10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Kasimpur, District – Saharsa. 11. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Kasimpur, Block – Nauhatta, District – Saharsa. …. Respondents. ----------- 02/ 12.10.2009 This writ application filed by the petitioner for a direction to the concerned respondents to consider his case for appointment on the post of Panchayat teacher in the Gram Panchayat Raj Kasimpur in Nauhatta Block in the district of Saharsa in the category of physically handicapped as persons not eligible were appointed ignoring the eligibility of the petitioner. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner in order to bring letter no. 118 dated 17.9.2009 on the record of the writ application, Annexure-14, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa has directed to initiate - 2 - an enquiry with regard to the bungling done by the concerned authorities in appointment in the concerned Gram Panchayat. Counsel appearing for the petitioner in the light of Annexure-14 seeks permission to withdraw this application as his grievance is under consideration before the concerned authorities. However, the petitioner prays for a liberty to move again before this Court, if in case of the final outcome of the enquiry his grievances are not redressed. This writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)