1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 863 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 508 OF 2010 Anup Ranjan Rai ...Applicant vs. The State through The Central Bureau of Investigation/ ACB, Delhi. ...Respondent Ms.Shakuntala Wadekar for the Applicant. Mrs.P.P. Bhosale, APP for the State. Ms.U.V. Kejrewal for Respondent No.1  Union of India, CBI. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JULY 9, 2010 P.C. :- 1 The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to suffer RI for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs.5000/- and in default, to suffer RI 2 for 3 months. He is also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 120-B read with Sections 419, 468 and 471 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- and in default, to suffer further RI for 10 days. The applicant was on bail during trial. He has already paid the fine amount. Taking into consideration the sentence awarded by the Sessions Court, in my view, the applicant deserves to be released on bail. 2 The applicant is already released on bail by the Sessions Court under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. The said bail order to continue during pendency of the appeal. The applicant, however, shall execute fresh bond. 3 Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)