IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2011 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32777 of 2011(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MARIYA CELINE V.B., AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.BABU ANTONY V.A., VELLEPARAMBIL HOUSE, THIRUTHOODA LANE, SOUTH KALOOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. NEHA V.H., AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.HARSHAL, JAWAHAR ROAD, VYTTILA P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN SRI.ARUN THOMAS SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686560 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM - 686560 SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 32777 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P-1 PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM DATED 11-11-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF HER PAPER IN 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER COMBINED. EXT.P-2 PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM DATED 11-11-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF HER PAPER IN 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER COMBINED. /true copy/ P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).32777/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 8th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers in the combined 1st and 2nd semester B.Tech supplementary Examination vide Exts.P1 and P2 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs