IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5097 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 5097 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 5097 OF 2008 Anthony Selvan & others. ... Petitioners. V/s. Union of India & others. ... Respondents. V.M.Parkar for the petitioners. T.J.Pandian for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA and CORAM: V.C.DAGA and CORAM: V.C.DAGA and MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED: 3rd April 2009. DATED: 3rd April 2009. DATED: 3rd April 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. Perused petition. 2. The grievance of the petitioners in this petition is that their application being O.A.No.803/2003 was decided behind the back of the petitioners since the advocate appearing for the petitioners was not present before the Tribunal. If the petitioners were not heard and contend that the order was passed behind their back, it was open for them to go before the Tribunal with the prayer for review and bring this fact to the notice of the Tribunal. In the event of such approach Tribunal will certainly look into the matter. 3. In the above view of the matter, we do not propose to interfere with the impugned order. Petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs reserving liberty to approach Tribunal. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)