THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.9244 OF 2007 Dated:19.06.2007 Between: K.Chandra Kala Devi …Petitioner And: The Station House Officer, Panjagutta Police Station, Panjagutta, Hyderabad and five others. …Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO TAKEN UP WRIT PETITION No.9244 of 2007 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao) Heard the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 2. This is a taken up writ petition on the basis of a petition, dated 23.04.2007, addressed to the Honourable the Chief Justice, High Court of A.P., by one Smt K.Chandra Kala Devi, resident of Hyderabad, alleging that her daughter by name Manasa Ravali Kalur was kidnapped by one Partha Saikhiya, Security Guard, resident of Gauhwati, Assam State, and further alleged that her daughter is a minor. 3. The first respondent-Inspector of Police, Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad, filed counter- affidavit stating, inter alia, that on the basis of the complaint lodged by the petitioner a case in Crime No.242 of 2007 was registered under the head “Girl Missing”. On investigation, the alleged detenue and the said Partha Saikhiya were traced and the alleged detenue stated that she got married with the said Partha Saikhiya on 30.04.2007 at Nagaon of Assam State on her own will and consent. She denied that she was kidnapped by the said Partha Saikhiya. 4. Subsequently, the alleged detenue and the said Partha Saikhiya were produced before the XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, and the learned Magistrate in his docket order, dated 08.06.2007, mentioned that the alleged detenue as well as her husband informed that they have been living together by leading matrimonial life peacefully, for which her mother has no objection. The alleged detenue and the said Partha Saikhiya are going along with the mother of the alleged detenue to her house to live together. 5. Today, both the alleged detenue and the said Partha Saikhiya are present before this Court and stated that they are married and have been living harmoniously. On the earlier occasion, the mother of the alleged detenue was present and she submitted that she has no objection for her daughter (the alleged detenue) and the said Partha Saikhiya living together. 6. Considering the said statements of the alleged detenue and her mother, we do not see any ground whatsoever to proceed further in the matter. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J _______________ D.APPA RAO, J 19.06.2007 dr