1. t S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7869/2010 Shambu Ram Yadav Vs. Jagdish Mohan Date of Order :: 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. D.D. Chitlangi, for the petitioners. ... To challenge the order dated 9.8.2010 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Bikaner this petition for writ is preferred. The Rent Tribunal by the order aforesaid rejected the application preferred by the petitioner-non-applicant seeking amendment in written statement. The Tribunal while rejecting the application held that the fact regarding availability of a lane in southern side of the rented-premises is already mentioned in the written statement, thus, no further clarification of the fact is required. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that by the amendment the petitioner/non-applicant want to add measurement of lane and other necessary details pertaining to availability of space to park vehicles in the lane concerned. Having considered the arguments advanced and after perusing the order impugned and other pleadings of case, I am 2. of the view that the petitioner/non-applicant shall be having adequate occasion to provide the details which he want to include in the written statement by adducing evidence. The basic foundation in this regard is already available in written, in terms that a lane is existing in the southern side of the rented- premises. The measurement and other necessary details of lane can certainly be given while adducing evidence. In such circumstance, I do not find any error with the order impugned that may warrant interference of this Court while exercising the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition for writ is accordingly dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Sanjay/ 3.