1 S.B. Civil writ petition No. 2525/2010 Smt. Rohini Shah vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order 12.3.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. PR Mehta for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 4.3.2010 by which the petitioner has been informed that in view of term of the contract, her services have come to an end on 28.2.2010 as the respondents have decided not to extend his services. It is undisputed that term of the contract was only for one year and the respondents have decided not to extend the term of the contract and by communication dated 4.3.2010 the petitioner was informed that her services shall come to an end on 28.2.2010. Therefore, in the contract matter, the petitioner cannot claim for renewal of contract as a matter of right. In view of the above, this court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-