IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO. 1227 OF 2005 M/s.Ion Exhcnage (India) Ltd. & Anr. ...Petitioners. Vs. Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai,&Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr. M.K. Nesari for the Petitioners. Mrs.A. R. Joshi for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. May 2, 2005. P.C.: A copy of the tabulated ward report on the basis of which an enhancement in the rateable value is proposed by the Municipal Corporation has been handed over by the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation to the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that a complaint has been filed on 22nd March 2005 under Section 163(2) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Second Respondent is directed to hear and dispose of the complaint in accordance with law after furnishing to the Petitioner an opportunity of being heard. In the meantime, until a decision on the complaint is arrived at, the Corporation shall not take coercive steps to enforce the bill which has been served on the Petitioner forming the subject matter of the complaint. The Second Respondent shall pass a final order within three months from today. The petition is accordingly disposed of. ........