c-^€- ,^p^^ />^z A<^-"- . . L^>-'')<sFz57 singre! IN THfc HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wrif Petition(3)No. _3^£3^J2009 Petitioner Amar Singh Markam, aged about 46 years, S/o Shri L. R. Markam, working as Head Master, Primary School y.Toripara, Vikas Khand - Baderajpur, R/o Village 8s Post—Baderajpur, Tahsil Vishrampuri, District - Bastar (C.G.) Resppndents 1. Vei-sus <-' 2. 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Assistant Com.missioner, Tribal Welfare, Jagdalpur, Bastar (C.G.) Collector (Adivasi Vikash Sakha) Bastar, Jagdalp'ur(C.G,) <^District Educatiori Officer, Bastar, near Collector Office, Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNOER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER OR flRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. 1+-4- -HG—78 311^1 W Wl* ^W 3TT^?I sb^fich *11*1<»11 <t»*1iq» 3S[ '<<|<41MA|, ®ti1*f'IS,fsldl'My .........U.:&...L^.~)....^<. 2009) sn^T TWK (.ipfg^Ef) ^inw^ito aii^t SB : HON'BLi f.^a-a 21.Q'7.20Q9 Shri Prasbaat Jaiswal, Sr Shanna, counsel for the T Ms. Sunita Jaia, P.L. for •! CIiallenge ia. fhe presenl 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/1) 1 workiag as Headinaster has School, Dham.an.puri, Block BE Education officer, Darbha. pup, Contention of coiinsel fol dated 26.2.2009 the petitioner from. Prmiary School, Dhatapit School, Toraipur, Block BaderE order tlie petitioner has been. He subiaits that wifhiu four tiines aad the same is not penx per fhe transfer policy. Counsel for fhe State c| Etake a representation to be decided strictly in accordaa.^ r* representation. However he s^ issued for decidm.g fhe repiesei] +l<4l<'1^1Tl *iW<^ tf FS^ •(.Fqt^.K iTaiRnsn^i Advocate wifb Shri Shailendra be State. petition is to the order dated [iy which the petitioaer who is been trao.sferred from Primart' iderajpur to the option of Block the petitioner is th.at vide order |was proinoted aiid was shifted u|-i, Blcok Baderajpur to Prmiaty ~4jpur. Tbeisafter vide itdpugned transferrcd within four nionths. nl.onth.s he has been sriifted te~o lissible under tlte law or even as [sntends that ]fit the petitioner respo|a.deut No.l aad fhe saine would wifh law. ;ounsel for the pel^tioner agrees to make a hibiuits that direction m.av 'be tation so niade exoedltiouslv. ^^ XI-HG—78 3TI^[ W R-1 "^sn SFTT^T ai*ii^> tl 'fe 'S^I '^W\v\<^, »tlly'|(o, [qMiyy ^..^^.(.^~)...'^M..^ ,„a *il*«»iia>*ii<b "'--•••-—• --••^pFj 200 I sn^n^? (licif^'5i<it?) wffiw^fCTsn^t Accorduigly, the petition the petitioner to make a reprc^ withia. a period of ten days fro( of tius order, the sam.e woul4 three weeks frora. tlie date of itN cni<it<n<i1i *ii*i<nf ^f ^s^ <FiiK^f< ^sifinan^ii is disposed ofwith a direction to ^entation to the re.spondent No. 1 \s. the date of receipt of the copy be decided withia a period of receipt. Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge