^.,10^ v^ ! Ts ^'•"aS" /Kl; ;,.. 3s- E ii!L '¥"°¥'t £?•/f^. ^ Br {L )UKT Q^° CHHATTI^GARH; Slngie Bench: Hon'bie Shri Diiip Raosahea Deshmukh, Secona Aep=a) No. 477 of2QQ7 Appeilant : M/s. Vinod Kumar Pramod Kumar, Psairstjff RegisterscS Psrtnership Firm, Carrying its 'business in Kirana at ?v1a!viya Road, Rajpur, Tahsij & District Ra.ipur (*-"-'/ Versus Respondents : 1. RamSaS Ramgopal Agrawa!, A Defendants business concern,. carrying its business at Maiviya Lane, Raipur, Tahsii & District Raipur (CG) 2. Ramiai Agrawal, aged about 70 y&ars, s/o Ramgopal Arawal, R/o Halwai Lane, Raipur, Tahsif & Distri'ct Ralpur (CG) SesfiM^gfieal uneler Section 100 C.P.C. Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsei for the appeilant. (Passedo"14.11.2007} ^....__. v "^^l' '"" ""'"".' -'"'^ ii2?^7^' Heard on I.A. No.1/2007 for condonation of deiay, in fiiingthe sec&nd sooea!. (2) The on!y ground mentioned in the application is that the appeiiant had approached the counse! appearing in ihe Courts beicw ind wa.s advised not to .Oi'efer an ap.Desl. Thereafter, it has been mentloned that the appeiJant'p!aJnt"T was not fjnancialiv sound. (3) No sufficient cause is shown.for condonation of de'ay in filin< 'nis secona appeas. (4) Accordjngjy, i.A. No. 1/2007 for condonation of delay,,.1s dismissed. As a consequence, the appeai aiso srands dismissed as barrec! by iimitation. (5) in view of the above, !.A. No.2 for conversion of second appeal into civiS revision stands disposed of. 1 DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh * Judge ^-^