1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3078 of 2009 Tufail v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A.Z. Gharde, Adv for applicant Mr D.P. Thakare, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 22nd September 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for applicant contends that applicant has been acquitted byh the Sessions Court at Lucknow (UP). Learned APP states that applicant hails from the State of Uttar Pradesh and number offences have been reported against him. He further submits that the present offence is under Section 392 IPC. It is apprehended that if released on bail, applicant may disappear and abscond. 2. In view of the apprehension expressed by learned APP, without observing anything on merits of this application, it is disposed of with direction to concerned Sessions Court to dispose of trial within three months. Learned APP appearing 2 before me undertakes to communicate his counter-part before the Sessions Court about this order. If the trial is not completed within three months without any fault on the part of applicant, liberty to applicant to apply for bail before the trial Court. Application disposed of. Judge. Hsj