THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.28359 of 2010 DT.16.11.2010 Between: B.Chenchu Prasad … Petitioner And The Registrar under Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act-cum- the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Gruhakalpa, Nampally, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP for Cooperation The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: The petitioner, who is a Director of respondent No.3-Society, registered under the A.P.Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995 (for short ‘the Act’), filed this writ petition feeling aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.3 in considering his representation/objections for inclusion of certain persons forming part of members of respondent No.3 in the proposed Voters List. At the hearing, Smt.Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that while under the bylaws of the Society, the exercise of preparation of the list of members eligible for voting shall be commenced and completed before 30th April and a decision on the objections raised against the proposed Voters List shall be taken up before 31st May of every year, respondent No.3 has delayed the preparation of the Voters List for more than five months. She further submitted that on coming to know about inclusion of several ineligible persons in the proposed Voters List, the petitioner has submitted his objections on 20.10.2010 to respondent No.3. She stated that unless these objections are considered and a final decision on the Voters List is taken immediately, the petitioner will lose the opportunity of availing his appropriate remedies in the event he feels aggrieved by the decision of respondent No.3, in view of the impending election notification. As I find the grievance of the petitioner justifiable, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation in accordance with the bylaws of the Society and the provisions of the Act, and communicate its decision to the petitioner before appointment of Election Officer. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36189 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 16.11.2010. Note: Communicate the operative portion of the order by wire at party’s costs. (b/o) VGB