IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36084 of 2011 Ratan Mittal, S/O-Roshan Lal Mittal Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 03 30.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for C.B.I. Petitioner is in jail custody since 04.03.2011 in a case registered under Sections 120 (B), 467, 468, 471, 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13 (2) read with Section 13(1) (d) of the P.C. Act, 1988. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without admitting the case of prosecution, petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 2,95,000/- in the court in two equal installments. It is also submitted by him that earlier the petitioner was made accused in R.C. No. 28 (A) of 2006 and in the aforesaid case also he deposited the amount in question by the order of this Court. To fortify his contention, he drew my attention towards Annexure-2 to this petition. Although, learned counsel appearing for C.B.I. opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner but he submitted that if the concerned company gets the amount in question he has no objection. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional 2 Sessions Judge-II, Patna in connection with R.C. No. 10 (A) of 2006 corresponding to Special Case No. 05 of 2006 subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, petitioner shall deposit the amount in question in the court concerned within four months in two equal installments after his release from judicial custody. It is made clear that failure on the part of the petitioner to deposit the above stated amount shall give liberty to the trial court to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. It is also made clear that the concerned company may withdraw the deposited amount from the court concerned subject to result of trial. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)