IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13034 of 2009 1. MANOJ KUMAR SINGH S/O SHRI SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL.- BARAURA, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE KAIMUR DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION KAIMUR DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RAMGARH, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER RAMGARH, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 6. THE MUKHIA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BARAURA, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 7. THE SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BARAURA, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTRICT- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) 8. SH. GHANSHYAM BHARTI S/O RAM BACHAN RAM R/O VILL.- NATWA, P.O.- BARAURA, P.S.- RAMGARH, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA) ----------- 2. 04.01.2010 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioner’s case is that he was appointed as Panchayat Shikcha Mitra in Middle School, Baraura but on verbal direction of Mukhiya of the concerned Gram Panchayat, he was removed from his service without any show cause and without giving any reasonable opportunity to defend himself. Petitioner never filed any objection against his illegal removal before the competent authority that is the District Magistrate as per the guidelines for appointment of Panchayat Shikcha Mitras. For the first time, after five years, he has come before this court by filing this writ application asking for the relief. The prayer of the petitioner is time barred, as such; it is dismissed on the point of limitation itself. Akv/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)