IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1468 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1468 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1468 OF 2006 Union of India & Another ... Petitioner V/s. Dinesh Hiralal Borade & ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.S. Pakale i/b. Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the petitioner. Mr. S.U. Marne for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 4th December, 2006 : 4th December, 2006 : 4th December, 2006 P.C. . The respondents had approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, apprehending that they will not be regularised in the post of Peon and they will be replaced with other ad-hoc candidates. Considering the rules and the facts on record, the learned Tribunal held in favour of the respondents and directed the petitioners herein to consider the case of the applicants for regularisation before any deputationist, irrespective of the length of his service, or any person junior to the applicants is considered for regularisation against any of the three posts. 2. After perusal of the impugned order and the ( 2 ) final direction, we do not find that the order suffers from any error of law apparent on the face of the record. Hence, this is not a fit case to exercise our extra-ordinary jurisdiction. In the light of that, petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]