IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4026 & 4029 of 2010 Between: Bolagani Ramakrishna Rao and another ..... PETITIONERS AND State Bank of India rep.by Chief Manager, Stresses Assets Resolution Center, Zonal Office, Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4026 & 4029 of 2010 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners are the defendants in the suit filed by the respondent bank in O.S.243/2007 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalle. After the evidence is closed on both sides and when the matter was posted for arguments, the petitioners filed two I.As.588/2010 and 589/2010 for the purpose of recalling and for further cross examination of PW 1 on the ground that the defendants have changed their previous counsel and reliably learnt that the plaintiff bank has conducted auction with regard to the property mortgaged and therefore, PW 1 is required to be recalled and further cross examined. No particulars have been furnished as to the date of conduct of the auction of the mortgage property under the provisions of Securitization Act and realization of amounts. However, if any amount was already recovered by the bank, the bank is entitled to recover the balance suit amount alone. The realization of the amounts out of the sale proceeds of the properties of the defendants is a matter of evidence which was already available with the bank. The petitioners filed an application and obtained certified copies of the same. As no sufficient cause was shown, the Court below rightly dismissed both the applications. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the said order. Both these Civil Revision Petitions are accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 11.03.2011 Dsr