IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12206 of 2010(O) ------------------------------------ OS.135/2006 of MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SUDHA, AGED 55 YEARS, D/O.NANU, FLAT NO.424, IIIRD FLOOR, BLOCK 7, R.M.S.NAGAR, PATTOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. RAVI DAS, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN, CHERUVILA VEEDU, PUTHENCHANTHA, VETTOOR VILLAGE, VARKALA. 2. B.RAVEENDRAN, DAYANA HOUSE, PUTHEN CHANTHA, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P. BHAVADASAN, J --------------------------- W.P.(C).No.12206 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition filed under section 227 of Constitution of India. The limited prayer made by the petitioner is that there may be a direction to the Sub Court, Attingal to take up A.S.12/09 and A.S.15/09 and dispose of it within a period to be prescribed by this court. 2. The suit was filed for evicting the respondent from the shop room . There was arrears of rent also. Suits were decreed. Copy of judgment produced as Ext.P1. There was another suit which was decreed. Copy of decree produced and marked as Ext.P2. Petitioner had taken out execution of both the decree in his favour. At that point of time, the respondent approached Sub Court, Attingal with A.S.12/09 and A.S.15/09. The appellants had moved an application for W.P.(c) No.12206/10 2 stay. That was granted by the lower appellate court. 3. It is pointed out that the petitioner herein is seriously suffering from various ailments for which she had to remain in hospitals frequently. Exts.P7, P8 and Ext.P9 are produced to substantiate the above fact. The petitioner prays that there may be a direction to dispose of Ext.P5 and P6 and so that she can enjoy the decree passed in the suits. 4. In the nature of an order propose to be issued, notice to respondents is unnecessary. 5. The prayer made is for a direction for early disposal of Ext.P5 and P6 appeals pending before the Sub Court, Attingal. It is true that the appeals are of the year 2009. The petitioner has given certain reasons which made her seeks early disposal of the cases. The prayer seems to be just and reasonable. Therefore there will be a direction to the Sub Court, Attingal to take up A.S.12/09 and A.S.15/09 W.P.(c) No.12206/10 3 pending before the sub court, Attingal dispose of it as expeditiously as possible within six months from the date of reopening of the court after summer vacation. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. Sou.