IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.581 of 2009 1. BAIDNATH PASWAN S/O SRI SITAI PASWAN 2. SEEMA @ MANA KUMARI W/O BAIDNATH PASWAN, D/O SRI LAKKHMAN ROY (BOTH ARE R/O VILL.- GHAGI, P.S. NANPUR, DIST. SITAMARHI. ---- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SITAMARHI. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF GOVT. NORTH CARE HOME (RAJKIYA UTTER RAKSHA GRIH) GAYGHAT, PATNA-7 5. LAKSHMAN ROY S/O RAM KHELAWAN ROY, R/O VILL.- GHAGHI, P.S. NANPUR, DIST.- SITAMARHI. ---- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 06. 08.01.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Heard Mr. Piyush Lal, learned Assistant Counsel to AAG III. Petitioner no.1 claims to have married petitioner no.2 after they had eloped. This led to a criminal case bearing no. G.R. 52 of 2008, Nanpur P.S. Case no. 15 of 2008. The statement of petitioner no.2 under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. was recorded. She was also referred to the medical board for assessment of her age. In the mean time, she has been forwarded to the care home, where she continues to be lodged. It appears to us that the matter is pending before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate Pupari, at Sitamarhi. Therefore, we would not like to proceed any further in the matter. It goes without saying that it will be open to the petitioners to pursue the same. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sym/ (S.K.Katriar,J.) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)