^Y r. WRIT PETITIONNO. B2-°) ^0<^ (Petition under artfcte PETITIONER SBreadtaPrasad Smgti, sged aboBt S©^eais, S/o l^^^S^'Pi3sa^Sa^B.3S,pase!:&'vro^snS^ a Sub Diviaonal ^lficCT, &nall W^cr R^w^ Sifc-Iit^um, Kondapon,^^^^^^^ Bagtar eptatfeisgi^t, 3R/o Iniga^bti Goloay, I&Midagaffli, Distt. Bastar, (CG) VERSSS RESPONDENJS : ggiHtiyffixou^feeSecietacy. 10!^aitnient, DKS filianwm, State':' ^a$er:5Re ^tpui,® RaJflM,©.© ^giaeer; bidiam^ :nir, DBtt. Bastar C.G. DivisuMi, Executise %atCT jR.esQUTCes .s;®astai,;:e.©.1'. ":^: ),; SWe- soBKces /tet7~Sjp:m/' '< • ^'fi'^ ''• • ••Jr.-'. XI-HC-22 3^ '^l'illCl'M, ®Tfl<1'l(S,R|ct|y^< 3ii^i Mach LO.f.yJlo. 1S2-5 *11*1CTI 5t)t(|tt> ••••••••••••••••••••• g^- 200 Sn^TqiT ferara.n^r Sli^Wflfer 3ll^l6WIW:flf?(T <t>l<<Fl-l<fl-l't(l*«lTfffe'<fl<.Rl+<il<, ^sri^iran^T 6/4/200S countel Shri Vistmu Kostfaa, Shri Saadeep Dubey, Qov 1 to 4/State. Heard. , By this petition under India the petitioner seeks to dated 15.3.2005 passed by tbe| Departaient whereby the petiti^ post ofSub Divisional Officcr, of Assistaat Engmeer (RuraJ) in Water Resources Department, No.5 Shri R.M-Agiuhotri aad transferred in place ofthe petitk) The majn grievance of fh^ No.5 is aot eligible to be posted Sub Division, Kondagaon aad petitjoner, and as the petition( duriag the pcndeacy of the clsewhcrc. Leamed counsel for the ri uiay be atlowed to make a reprej which leamed State counsel ha^ Haviag heard tearaed regard to thc facte and for tfae Pctitioner. Advocate for tfae respondents No. Art|icte 226/227 of the Constitution of (}uestion the propriety- of ttie order [Dcputy Secretaiy, Water Rcsources ititjner has been tiansferred from. the [ub-Division, Kondagaon to the post |the office of fhe Bxecutive Engineer, |<ondagaon ia place of RespoiKleat t^ie said Respondent No.5 has been itk^ner. petitioner is that thc Reapondcat |as S.D.0. ia SmallWater Resources le has been posted in place of the -r is looking at the Nabard worlt, s^id woik he canaot be teansferred etttioner submlts that the petitioner ientatioa to tbe Respondent No. 1; to no objection. c^imsel for the parties and having of thc case, in fhc opiaion of circumsltanccs XI-HC-22 3^ '<ii<iici<i, aTfly'Ko, Ridiyy 3T1^| '4vich <^i. p. t-Co. 13-i-^/ •2.<ws- *<1*1CTI gawaR """""" """•••^ 200 ')r 3H^T^ R-o+sn^r aitiroHfer .-(^'^ 311^1 ^WIWfffetT -'z- reasottable rqusing cons|deriag tbis Court tfae linuted prayer petitioner appcars to be aflowed to inake a representatio(u today to fh.e respondent No.l the Respondent No. 1 shatt de< ^ objective maaner wifhin a perioi^ such representation, after petitioaer and tiU the decision petitioncr shaU not be relievcd, i|F With fhe direction finaUy. Consequentty M(W)P No. also stend disposed of. Certified copy as pcr Rule!| aforestid «ni<il<-i<fl-ftii*)ciTfftetA<R]«i< ^ari^iTsn^r made by teamed counsel for the Therefore, the petitioner is within a pcriod of one week fi-om asing aU his gdcvances and ia tui-u ade the said representation in. aa of 30 days fiom the date receipt of all the poiats raised by tfae oa the representation is madc, fhe 'he is already not rclieved. ud, the petition stands disposed of (.037/2005 and I.A. No. 2523/2005 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge