IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41806 of 2010 ASHOK YADAV, SON OF CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWABGANJ, P.S. SURYAGARHA, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI--- ---PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR---------------------------------------------------OPP. PARTY ----------- 2. 21.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner prays for bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR but subsequently on suspicion he along with two other accused persons have been arrested. It is submitted that all the three accused persons are alleged to have been identified by one of the witnesses in the T.I. Parade but the other two accused persons have been granted bail by this Court by order dated 3.11.2010 (Annexure-3) passed in Cr.Misc.No.39700 of 2010. It is further contended that the petitioner is admittedly a disabled person for which he has filed relevant certificate before the learned Additional Sessions Judge; whereas in the FIR no such fact has been mentioned which clearly goes to show that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is also stated that the 2 petitioner has remained in custody for more than five months since 13.7.2010. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Ashok Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Suryagarha P.S.Case No. 145/10. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/