IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2 2 3 2 OF 2 0 0 9 Lalita S. Bombade & Another .. Applicants V /s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. S / S hri Indrajeet Joshi, i /b. S. R. Ganbavale, for Applicants Shri H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. (Vacation Judge) DATED: 1 9.05.20 0 9. P.C.: 1. By this application, applicants are prayinhg for enlarging them on anticipatory bail in connection with C. R. No. 39 of 2009 lodged u nder section 498-A and 406 r /w. 34 of I. P. C. The marriage between complainant Chitanya and accused Sharad was solemnized on May 12, 2008. The Applicant No., 1 is mother while Applicant No. 2 Snehalata is the sister of Accused Sharad. After the marriage, complainant and her h u sba nd Sharad resided jointly at Radhanagari. It is alleged that after the m arriage, accused started tau nting and harassing Chitanya a nd also demanded Rs.1,00,000 /- for the purpose of renovation of the old ho use. It is further alleged that on December 25, 2008, she was driven to her parent’s ho use. It is also alleged that though s he was pregnant, applicant no. 1 Lalita inflicted kick blow over her stomach a nd told her to abort her baby. 2. The Application preferred by the applicant for the anticipatory bail was rejected by the learned Sessions J u dge on May 6, 2009. While rejecting the bail, the learned Sessions J u dge found that there are more tha n 4 / 5 witnesses who are residents of Radha nagari h ad corroborated the statement of the complainant. Not only that, the entire J ain Comm u nity was enraged a nd had taken out Morcha at Radhanagari Police station, demanding justice to Chitanya. The learned Sessions J u dge found some s ubstance in the allegations m ade by the complaint. 3. The complainant is pregnant and still s he was assa ulted. There is obviously no reason for the complainant to put her m arried life at stake by making false allegations. Taking over all view in the m atter, I am of the opinion that no case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, application is rejected. Sd /- (R.G.KETKAR, J.)