IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5010 of 2008 Between: Y.Sudha Rani, D/o.Late Sunder Rao, 73-1-3/2,Narayanapuram, Opp: R.T.O.Office, Rajahmundry. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director of Collegiate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 Smt Kandukuri Rajyalakshmi College for Women Rep by its Principal, Rajahmundry, West Godavari Dist. 3 The Correspondent, Smt.Kandukuri Rajyalakshmi College for Women, Rep by its Principal Rajahmundry,West Godavari Dist., .....RESPONDENT(S Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioner to report to duty after the expiry of leave on 31-01-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as P.E.T. with same terms and conditions. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.V.BHATT Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner claims to have been appointed as P.E.T. in the 2nd respondent-College, in the year 2004. She states that she applied for leave from 27.09.2007 to 31.01.2008, on account of gynaec problem and complains that when she reported to duty, respondents 2 and 3 are not permitting her to join the institution. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Higher Education. Though the petitioner furnished some particulars, as to her being appointed as a teacher on consolidated salary, record is silent as to the grant of leave to her, or the date of reporting to duty. In the absence of the necessary particulars and information, this Court cannot entertain the writ petition. The petitioner can very well approach the respondents with proper application, duly furnishing necessary facts. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed, at the admission stage, leaving it open to the petitioner to make necessary application to the respondents pointing out her grievance. Depending on the reaction of the respondents to such a representation, the petitioner can work out her remedies. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.11.03.2008 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J GJ