^/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETITION (227) No. 2426 of2008 PETITIONER APPLICANT RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANT Zila Salikari Kendriya Baiik Maryadity Tlirou^i: The Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpyr, 'Dist. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS : 1) The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, ClTliattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Joint Registi'ar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar Director, 4) .ALmn Verma S/o Kishan. Verma, Ex-Lamps Manager, Jaibel^ Distt. Bastai' C.G< R/o Nagamar, Distt. Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRFT PETITION U/A 227 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgmhQtn.J, Present: Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Y.S.Tliakur, Deputy Advocate Geiieral for the State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 28m day of April, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner-Bank submits that the respondent No. 4 was terminated from ser\7ice after proper enquiry on 19.04.2005. The respondent No. 3, thereafter quasshed the termination order iti an appeal filed by the respondeiit No. 4 on 09.01.2007 (Aimexure P/l). Being aggrieved, the petitioner-Baiik preferred an appeal before th^ Joint Registrar, Cooperative Soci^ties, aloiigwith an application for stay offhe order dated 09.01.2007 passed by the Deputy Registrar. The Joint Registrar dismissed the application for staymg the order dated 09.01.2007, on 16.05.2007 (Annexure P/2). The petitioner, thereafter prefenBed a revision which was also dismissed on 25.02.2008 (Annexure P/3) on the ground of non-mamtainability. Thm, this petltion. 2. Sliri Bharat, leanied counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that after dismissal ofthe application for stay^ the Joint Registrar^ respondent No. 2 is not deciding the appeal which was filed m the month of Febmary 2007. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 3. In normal course, this Court should not entertam such petition seelking a direction to the quasi-judicial authority for disposal ofappeal. Hov^ever, in the facts situation ofthe case, the petitioner is at liberty to make an application before fhe Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously. 4. In view ofthe foregoing obser^ations, fhis petition stands disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge A3?lit