IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20347 of 2010 AJIT PANDIT @ JNANESHWAR KUMAR @ GYANESHWAR KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 03.02.2011 The petitioner is the husband and apprehends arrest in Ayer P.S.Case No. 1 of 2010 instituted under Section 498A/34 I.P.C and other Sections read with Dowry Prohibition Act pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara. The complainant on whose complaint the F.I.R was instituted and has appeared. The petitioner states that the complainant is not ready to meet her matrimonial obligations and obligation as a daughter-in-law in her sasural. She wants to live separately ignoring her in-laws and even refuses to do cooking for the family. The father of the complainant insisted that his daughter cannot be made to work and if it be so the petitioner can come and stay with him as Gharjamai. It is totally unacceptable. In 2009, parties agreed that the parties returned each other belongings and close the chapter but once again the matter has been reopened. 2 In my view, if the parties cannot reconcile and live together as husband and wife it is always better that rather than get into acrimonious scene and fights,they should agree to separate and live peacefully. Be that as it may, in the event of his arrest or surrender, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Ayer P.S.Case No. 1 of 2010,subject to the conditions , as laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)