IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. : 8322 of 2008. Decided on: 3rd December, 2010. ____________________________________________________ Anil Singh Bhardwaj. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge(Oral): Mr. M.C. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable his client to make a fresh representation for the redressal of his grievance, including the claim for scale of `160- 400/-, to which, according to him, he was entitled after putting in one year service after induction in the pay scale of `125-300/- as per the Recruitment and Promotion Rules framed in the year 1973. The representation shall be made to the respondent No. 2, i.e., Director of Education, Himachal Pradesh within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the Director of Education within a period of two months by a speaking order after the production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be heard in person by the Director of Education before passing the order, effectively. It is made clear that in case the representation of the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - petitioner is decided in his favour, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 03, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 -