1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 303 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 1754 OF 2006 Kashibai Waman Patil (deceased) through her heir and legal representatives and others. ... Plaintiffs Versus Taukirahmed Mohammed Hanif Khan and others. ... Defendants And Govind Kabra Bhadricha. ... Applicant -------- Mr. A.G.Damle Advocate for the plaintiffs. Mr. P.R.Gyani Advocate for Defendant No.1. Mr. A.P. Rege Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar Advocate for Defendant No. 2. -------- CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : 09th JULY, 2009. P.C. 1. By this Chamber Summons, the Applicant seeks to be joined as party Defendant to the Suit. The prayer clause ( c ) of the plaint specifically mentions the name of the Applicant, which prayer reads as follows. “c) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to declare that the agreement dated 22-1-1988 executed by Shri. Taukirahmed Khan in favour of Govind K. Bhadricha is null and void and not binding upon the Plaintiffs ;” ndm chs.303.07.sxw 2 2. Thus, the Plaintiffs are seeking relief in respect of the agreement, of which the Applicant is a party and further they want the said agreement should be declared null and void. Any orders passed in the suit in respect of the said Agreement would certainly affect the rights of the Applicant. The Applicant therefore is a necessary and proper party to the suit. 3. The Plaintiffs are directed to implead the Applicant as party defendant to the suit. Plaintiffs to carry out amendment within three weeks. Amended plaint be served upon the Applicant. 4. The Chamber Summons is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. A.A. SAYED, J. ndm chs.303.07.sxw