^ 3 /<<s^--" ...-•-' 3.!;^ts?'""~ s.^?\/:ef^.--"' ^---^w""' ,.>,".;4K'/v;.V'"' fr'^.-L'1 \ »*•' ,r. l^ A''^'t '^y >..• A8' THE H!GH COURT OF JUD!CATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATT'SGARH W P PETITIONER : ^ SwamiMaghav Bharti, Aged abouttf^years, S/o. Nathuram Jafn, R/o. Krishna Nasar, Boriya Road, Sundar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education Deptt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Raipur Pension Bada; Raa'pur District Raipur (C.G.) Director of Public Instructtion Pension Bada, Rai'pur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ^3] ^41 Principal, Government Hlgher Secondary School; Mana Camp, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .XI-HC-22 t1': ^ m ?-^ -i|l<)lcl*l, aiil'M'is, fa'n.i'yy sn^i^i R-ii* sn^a ^fl<+ yficr t ^ 111WI tflW^l M.....^0!^ • "^ 3nt?T^gigT'Hf??r 8-2-21 Shri Vaibhav Goverdha'n, ^ounsei for the petitioner. ShriS.P.Kate.Govt.Adv. Apulication for urgent hea ct)i'4lddilTf fW(^\ ^ 'fe^ ^'W.!^ •^aipgTi an^i Learned counsei for the retired. He further submtts thai being given the second time compteted more than 24 years o for the State.on advance copy. ina is allowed. petitioner submits that the petitioner is the petitioner has been retired wiihout t>ounu prornotion, though the pefitioner reguiar service. He ateo submits that the t. He piaced reliance upon the decision of State of Cnhattisaarh & Ottiaii State counsei does not a'U Havini consldered the fal Accordingiy, the petition i^ allowed. Certified copy as per ruie^. Copy to State counsel.fe petitioner is entitiedfor the sam4. this Court dated 4-1-2006 rend^red in the case of V.K. Shrivastava vs. ff^ ^-"A .^^?'^-.''l'^ft/^S\ IV.r'. N0.05U4UUU3). >ute the above fact. :ts and circumstances and in view of the fact that the petitioner compiet^d more than 24 years of reguiar sen/ice and has not been given the b4 and further in v'iew of decisioni lirscteu i(iat the concerned autl the petitioner in accordanee withl •nefit of Time Bound Promotion Scheme of this Court in W.P.No.6504/2005, it te lority t6 consider and decide the case of I'awforgrantoftime bound promotion. Sdl- ^<rfdd^ ^^d^ [•'ft^^figq