333T THE EIGH. GOURT OF CHHATTI$GABH MQT BQASEUR writ ivetition No._,_239?/2oo1 PETI TI ON LR RESPONDEN TS : Tularam Jaiswal, S/o Shri Jnodiram Jaiswal, aged a‘baut 1+0 years, R/o Kodma Iviahant $.Q. Dongaria, Lormi, Dis trict- Bilas pur . - Versus — u “4., tate of Chhattis garb ihro ugh: Secretary , Department of Health, D .K.Bnawa.n , Raipur . (f1 : 1 ob 3 ,i‘q/tq / \— 2. Joint Director, Directorate of Health Services Ghha ttis garh , Raipur . 3. Chief Medical and Health Offic er, Bilaspur. w?» wan PETggION§wERAET1CLE 226/227 QF TuE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR IS§§MGE OF .A wRlT gig THE MTUHELOF Glagigmm , momBlTioN , :fggk m XJANDAMU$ Em. AND/OR 3UIE'ABLE_DIREETION OR ORDE . XE-HC—ZZ s m ‘1 mam mwt’ In the result this petition is bisposed of With a direction that the 3 I writ petitioner shall approach State Administrative Tribunal Within ten r days from today On receipt of petition the learned Tribunal shall proceed tto examine and dispose of the same on merit j l l l w. _t We Mtmuaw.” m “we“ we .e-.v ww‘vm, ewmamnu ’ L, 06.12.2001 Heard Shri Vinny Pandey, Iéarnfd Icounsel for the pefifioner‘. zm Heard also Shri Rajeev Shrivasfava, learned Panel-Lawyer for The No.1 / S‘rafe. ‘ iresponden'r i The wr'i‘r pe1'i1'ioner' was appo‘ir fed as Dish'ic‘r Leve! Malaria Worker by Chief Medical Officer Bllaspur on 27 O9 1985 and he was posted To Primary Heal'rh Cenfer, Vlllage:Lorml Whlle servmg as such, by anofher order dafed 07.09.2001 1he w 1f pefifioner was Transferred Li'o The wife of fhe wrif pe i‘rioner also vrorks at ‘rhe same place. ‘ JMahasamund. if lhusband V. The and learned wife are counsel working forfl'he as D£fric+ p fifioner Level submits Employees, vfha‘r since 1hey bo‘rh may The be iallowed 1'o s‘ray a‘r 1he same place If is also subml'Hed fha‘r normally ldis‘rric‘r level worker Is noi' fransfe red +0 anofher disfric‘i' If Is also‘ lifurfher s'l'afed ‘I’haf The wri‘l' pefmonpr has no? been released ‘hll dafe and his Lormi anabody has been pos‘l'ed In place a1] n 3% Shri RaJeev Shrivas'rava ha% painted out that since the writ 4M; §petitioner is a State employee this matter should be dealt With by thej State Administrative Tribunal This submissmn has force ‘ WW(W) Wm wW mmmm f amfraqm In fhe fads and circumsmnaas of The presem case, if will be quo as regards fhe service ondi‘rions particularly as regards place of pos‘ring of 1he wri‘r pefifioner- be mainfained as if exi 1’s on This dafe, unfil furfrreg arder's are passed by The Iearned ribunal. This wili mean 1'ha1' The peTiTioner shail be ailowed To conT aT Lor-mi unTil fur-Thar orde:§— 'n This regard, are passed by The lea ned TribunaL The peTiTion is accordingly, di posed of. ' I fhe inferesf of jus'rioe fhai' sf ‘ O H, i Sdl- 1 ‘ i f Chief Justice w, H r\ wwwm W ,J .J. ,w s e i e