HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR C.R.P.No. 5875 of 2009 ORDER As seen from the earlier orders, there was no representation for the petitioner on 29-01-2011 and 04-02-2011. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner though permitted to take out personal notice to the respondent, did not file proof of service. 3. I have perused the impugned order. I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. 4. Admittedly, the plot was allotted to the judgment debtor under Ex.R-1, which is a certified copy of deed of allotment. The said document reveals that the KUDA authority in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.463, dated 27-06-2007, allotted the plot to the judgment debtor at free of cost under rehabilitation and Welfare measure as he is an ex-employee of Azam Zahi Mills. The allotment is subject to certain terms and conditions; the allottee has no right to alienate the same to any third party and the allottee should complete the construction within the stipulated time and maintain and upkeep the environment of the area. Moreover, the allotment of house site is only for residential purpose without any right to alienate the property, and for the purpose of providing shelter to the judgment debtor. 5. In the above circumstances, the impugned order appears to be correct and I do not see any reason to interfere with the same. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. In the circumstances, no costs. ________________________ Justice B.Chandra Kumar Date: 10-06-2011 KVR