CWP(T) No. 2466 of 2008 (OA No. 555 of 1995) 09.11.2009 Present: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, vice Mr. Ashok Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Addl. AG with Mr. A.K. Bansal, Addl. A.G. and Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. AG for respondents No. 1 & 2. On 09.10.2009 the relief against respondent No. 3 was not pressed and accordingly the name of respondent No. 3 was ordered to be deleted. The petitioner in the petition has prayed the following effective reliefs:- (i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to designate the applicant as Pump operator or in the alternative as Pump Attendant and to pay him the daily wages accordingly. (ii) That in the alternative, it is prayed that the appointment/engagement of respondent No. 3 as Pump Attendant at Harraboi Scheme may be quashed and set aside and the respondent may be directed to consider the case of the applicant for designating him as Pump Operator. (iii) That the applicant may kindly be declared to be entitled for the daily wages of a Pump Operator since the year 1992 and the arrears of daily wages accruing thereon may be ordered to be paid to the applicant. 2. The name of respondent No. 3 has been deleted and therefore, the relief No. (ii) is not available to the petitioner. Insofar relief No. (i) is concerned it has been fairly submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that no such relief can be granted to petitioner on the case projected by the petitioner. As per relief No. (iii) prayer has been made that the petitioner may be declared to be entitled to wages as Pump Operator since 1992 and the arrears of daily wages as Pump Operator may be ordered to be paid to him. In the reply the respondents have stated that the petitioner was engaged as daily rated Beldar w.e.f. 01.05.1990 except for some days i.e. 158 days as Pump Operator and for that period the wages of Pump Operator were paid to him. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner in fact had worked as Pump Operator more than 158 days. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no merit in the petition, which is accordingly dismissed. November 9, 2009. (Kuldip Singh), (sks) Judge.