IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2011 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 378 of 2007() ------------------------ CC.570/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-III, PUNALUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NO.13: ----------------------------- ABDULKARIM, S/O. SHAHUL HAMEED, MUNDANKONIL, KARAVOOR MURI, PIRAVATHOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY SRI.R.ARUN RAJ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT: -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT NO.2: RAVI, S/O.BHASKARAN, MARUTHIVILA PUTHENVEETIL HOUSE, KURUNTHAMAN, VADAKKEKARA, KARAVOOMURI, PARAVATHOOR VILLAGE. IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD.26.3.2007 IN CRL.M.A. NO.881/2007 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.S.HYMA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN C.C.NO.570/2006 OF JFCM NO.III, PUNALUR ANNEXURE B: COPY OF THE STATEMENT DTD.4.4.2005 GIVEN BY KARTHIKEYAN TO THE SI OF POLICE, PATHANAPURAM ANNEXURE C: COPY OF THE STATEMENT DTD.4.4.2005 GIVEN BY ACHUTHAN TO THE SI OF POLICE, PATHANAPURAM ANNEXURE D: COPY OF THE STATEMENT DTD.4.4.2005 GIVEN BY INDIRA TO THE SI OF POLICE, PATHANAPURAM RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab K.HARILAL, J ------------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No.378 of 2007 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2011 O R D E R This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed to quash the entire proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.570 of 2006 on the files of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, III, Punalur. The contention raised by the petitioner is that for the very same offences the police charge sheeted another case as C.C.No.414 of 2005. When there is a specific provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure to meet the circumstance stated above in this Criminal Miscellaneous Case, there is no scope for an interference exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in view of the decision laid down by the Supreme Court in R.P.Kapur V. State of Punjab (AIR 1960 SC 866). In the above circumstances this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is closed with liberty to seek appropriate remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure before the trial court. Sd/- K.HARILAL JUDGE ab