1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1584 OF 2009 Zamanat Motiur Rasool ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra Sharafat Shafaqat Rasool Shafat Sharafat Rasool ...Respondents Mr.Wasim Ansari for the petitioner Mr.H.J.Dedhi A.P.P for State Ms Shabana Shah for respondent nos.2 and 3 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 10, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd and 3rd respondent. Rule. Learned A.P.P waives service for State of Maharashtra. 2 The petitioner lodged F.I.R alleging commission of offence under sections 324, 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The 2nd and 3rd respondents were arraigned as accused. It is pointed out that the second respondent is the cousin of the petitioner and the third respondent is the nephew of the petitioner. The dispute arose as regards sale of house where the parties are residing. The present petition is filed for quashing the proceedings initiated by the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner and 2nd and 3rd respondents have tendered on record consent terms signed by the parties and their respective Advocates recording settlement. There is an affidavit filed by the petitioner on record reiterating the settlement between the parties. The parties are closely related. The dispute was over the house property. Considering the nature of allegations in the F.I.R, in view of subsequent 2 settlement, a case is made out for exercising the power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. 3 Hence, I pass the following order : i) Rule is made absolute in terms of payer clauses (b) and (c). JUDGE