HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SUNiL KUMAR SINHA & HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MiSHRA PETIT ICC No.228/2011 Asgari Begum W/o Late Fajlur Rahman, aged about 51 years, R/o Near Masan Ganj Masjid, Bi!aspur, Tahsil -and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 1 Rajiya Begum, D/o Abdul Rahman, R/o Patl Road, Shahdol, Tahsii and District Shahdol (Madhya Pradesh) 2 The Addittonal Coliector Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 The President of Revenue Court, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.Q.) N0.3028/2S1Q Mr. Vivek Rathore, Counsel for the petltioner. Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Goyernment Advocate forthe State. ORAL ORDER ».V^«j The foiiowing order of the Court was passed by SuniJ KumarSinha. J. Heard on I.A. N0.01/2011, an appiication for condonation of delay in fiiing the MCC for restoration of W.P.(C)No.3028/2010. <" On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel ror the parties and the grounds taken in the appiication, I.A. No.01/2011 is allowed and the deiay in filing the restoration application is condoned. ,..?d'*33&> Y ^fy '%». ''^?' IVICC No.228/2011 Leamed counsel for the parties are also heard on restoration application i.e. MCC No.228/2011. The petitioner is seeking restoration of W.P.(C) No.3028/2010, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 7th ofJuly 2010. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration application, we are satisfied that the absence of learned counsel for the petitioner, when W.P.(C) No.3028/2010 was taken up for hearing, was based on bonafide grounds. We further note that the said writ petition was dismissed even before admission and the contesting respondent was not represented. We, therefore, ailow the MCC and direct that W.P.(C) No.3028/2010 be restored to its original number. Sdi- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge •'.A. r