1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 292 OF 2007 Mansi Mohan Chandarkar .. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri C. K. Talekar, APP for the State Smt. Varsha Palav for Respondent No.1 and 2 CORAM: MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: 6th October, 2009 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. By consent of the parties taken up for final hearing. 3. In this Criminal revision, the applicant has challenged the order dated 17th March, 2007, acquitting the accused from the offences punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that the Metropolitan Court has erred in appreciating the evidence and has wrongly considered certain facts as omissions. 5. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the application. 2 6. After going through the Judgment and also the evidence of the complainant, it appears that there is no such error of law or or error in appreciation of evidence. The learned Trial Judge, has properly appreciated the evidence of the witnesses and correctly found it insufficient to hold the accused guilty. Judgment of the learned Trial Judge is legal and no perversity is found, hence no interference is required. In the result, the revision application is rejected in limine with no order as to costs. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) jpc/-