IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3230 of 2011(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ MOHINI, W/O. VASU THIROOLI, APPUPILLAYUR, ELAPPULLY AMSOM AND DESOM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. TALUK LAND BOARD, PALAKKAD-678 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD-678 001. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ELAPULLY VILLAGE, PALAKKAD-678 622. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2011 ALONG WITH WPC.NO.3231 OF 2011 AND WPC.NO. 3255 OF 2011, THE COURT N THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) Nos.3230, 3231 & 3255 of 2011 ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners claim the status of deemed tenants under Section 7E of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. According to the petitioners, asserting their claim as above, they have already filed applications under Section 85(8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act before the first respondent and that orders have not been passed on the said applications. It is stated that during the pendency of the applications, steps are being taken by respondents 2 and 3 to evict the petitioners from their respective holdings. It is complaining of the above, they have filed these writ petitions. 2. Now that the claim under Section 7E of the Act is pending consideration of the first respondent, it is necessary that the first respondent should pass orders in the matter. This, the first respondent shall do with notice to the parties and as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within three W.P.(C) Nos.3230, 3231&3255/2011 : 2 : months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile, possession of the petitioners of their respective holdings covered by the applications mentioned above shall not be disturbed. 3. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petitions before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance. Writ petitions are disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge