THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1406 of 2010. Anil Parihar Son of Late Sri Gambhir Singh and another. … Petitioners. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. Raman Kumar Sah, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel & Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocates, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Date September 9, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Stay Application No. 6575 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned list of amended committee of management dated 20-6-2010 (Annexure-6 to the petition) and the order of dismissal of petitioners dated 16-7-2010 (Annexure-5) published in the daily news paper Dainik Jagran by the respondents. According to the petitioners, the grievance of the petitioners is that the committee of management sent a resolution to the Registrar, Firms Society and Chits, Pauri Garhwal to the effect that their names be deleted as Director and member of the committee of management on the ground that they remained absent in three consecutive meetings of the committee of management and they are not working in the interest of the society. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that under the bye-laws of the committee of management if the petitioners would have remained absent in four consecutive meetings of the committee of management, then only their names can be struck out or deleted. Apart from this ground, there is no other ground available to the respondents under the bye-laws. On the basis of the instruction received, the learned State counsel for the respondent no.1 has informed the Court that show cause notice was issued to the petitioners and 15 days’ time was given to file objections against the show cause notice as to why their names should not be struck out from the membership of the society. In response, the petitioners have also filed their reply to the show cause notice, therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable, there being no grievance to the petitioners as yet. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. However, the Registrar concerned is directed to decide the objection of the petitioners in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP