IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13315 of 2011 Ramprit Das son of Late Janki Das, Resident of village Uttarnama, P.O. Uttarnama, P.S. Rahui, Distt. Nalanda, at present C/O House of Doman Sao, Mogalkuan, P.O. and P.S. Soh Sarai, District Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through District Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Shariff. 2. The District Education Officer, Nalanda at Bihar Shariff. 3. The Principal cum Drawing Disbursing Officer, Rahui, Nalanda. 4. The Treasury Officer, Nalanda at Biharshariff. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 26.8.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in designation of respondent no.2 in course of the day. Heard Shri Satya Ranjan Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manikant Mishra, learned G.P.25, who appears on behalf of all the respondents. The petitioner, who retired as Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Akbalganj, Block Rahui, District Nalanda on 31.7.2008, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of sanctioned amount of leave encashment, increment and benefit of A.C.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has also filed representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda 2 earlier, but no decision has been taken nor aforesaid dues have been cleared. It was submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/District Education Officer, Nalanda at Bihar Shariff. Shri Manikant Mishra, learned G.P.25 points out that petitioner had earlier moved before this Court while invoking its writ jurisdiction. However, no detail has been mentioned in the petition nor order has been brought on record. Be that as it may, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/District Education Officer, Nalanda at Bihar Shariff within a period of six weeks from today for the claim made in the present writ petition. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If 3 respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)