‘ In wCQ‘m IN CHE MAIHYA IEADL‘E ArMITO‘ESTbA TIV” ”‘ LBU‘IA JABAuw Bmm $0.9 w £3 case No 9,A.@‘ /94. B etween A ppli ca nt‘ : C.B‘.Shrivas1';ava 3/0 Late $hri A.L.§hrivastava agec‘i 58 years, designation Asstt Erofessor (Higtory) Government College Bhanupratapmr (Bagtar) ., \ V$ Respondents” . Skate of ELE‘. through the Seeretary Collegiate- Edu‘cations Ballabh BhaWan Bhoyal M.E, 2. The Comrrinsiorw Directorate ofUc‘néh $h1ksna 3a tpuda Bhawan BLEOIJME My? g‘ gaxm es“m3 amam csmvp QMQL \(cmyw. mm Qwwwm Apgllcatloin undext- SecUlon 14 of the Au Act 1985. Ehe applicana‘ begs to submit as utmerz— L, sh kwQkvm m (nuvh Qwwk Cwa Q ‘hwmAes' Mm Gv m 0M0 'r Dewils 0f Application 1. (i) (ii) (iii) ‘- (VD I Offj. ce aadreee . Earticulars of the applicant Name of the appliearfo. Name of father. Age 0i? +be anallc nt besx-‘gnatloy am’grtlculars of office. ) Addreée fer service of notices 3 ‘Part‘iculaCS of the reeponfxent Name of the respondent ' ‘\Tavre d‘f~-fath er Afe of the “eepondent Designation and parblculars of office Office aoc‘iress Aoéresg for service of notioes Part4 cuEcs of the order against which uphoa’olon ls maae. i‘ae application 13 asiamet the followlna order M, ..2/- ’ ‘ As bo. ave wwrw ><v ><o ><a <><>ov As above ?“H HHWMM H / 9 L s . . H§§H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BéLASPUR WRIT PETITéON (S) N0329 OF 2005 PETiTiONER CB. Shrivastava Versus , State of MP. & Others RESPONDENTS Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agniinotri, J. Freseni :- None far the pei'iticnér. Shri P.K. Bhaeluri, PL for the State. ORDER §ORAL1 (Passed on this 16‘ day of $eptembér, 2009} The matter is caiied far hearing twice. On both occasians, none appears nor is any representation made en beha3f oi the petmoneat The petétioner may net be intemsted in the matte". 2) in View of the abeve, fhe writ peiih‘en is dismissed fer want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this erder to t‘ne petitioner forthwith. sd/- . ., ‘sau‘sh K. Asnihotn ‘3 Judge i A _