IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45009 of 2010 SUDARSHAN PRASAD RAM,S/O LATE KUNDAN RAM, R/O VILLAGE-DIYAMAN, MANOHAR CHAPRA, P.S. KRISHNA BRAHAM, DISTRICT-BUXAR. …………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. …………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02/ 26.03.2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the State and counsel for the informant. This Court taking into account that the complainant again took advantage of his own illegal act, inasmuch as, he claims to have married the second daughter of the petitioner during the subsistence of his first marriage with the elder daughter of the petitioner and that the matrimonial case no. 28 of 2010 filed by the complainant son-in-law was forerunner to the present criminal complaint case against the petitioner father-in-law, this Court would find adequate reasons for grant of anticipatory bail to him. That being so, if the petitioner namely Sudarshan Prasad Ram, surrenders within a period of four weeks from today, he would be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of 2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Simri P.S Case No. 65 of 2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C and also subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)