1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 12 OF 2009 (Nathu Budhaji Jodhe vs. Pandurang Budhaji Jodhe) AND SECOND APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2009 ( Nathu Budhaji Jodhe & Anr. vs. Pandurang Budhaji Jodhe ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 01, 2009. Heard Shri Khare, learned counsel for the appellants and Shri Kotwal, learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant and respondent are real brothers and considering the nature of controversy, they and their respective advocates were making efforts to find out whether controversy can be settled once for all. Yesterday, both the brothers were present before the Court and in presence of their respective counsel, they expressed that they wanted to settle the matter once for all. Accordingly, time was given to them till today. Today, they have tendered a compromise pursis which states the terms and conditions, according to which they have settled the controversy. The compromise pursis is signed by 2 both the brothers as also their respective counsel. Both the brothers state that terms and conditions are explained to them by their respective counsel and they have agreed to the same. Accordingly, compromise pursis is taken on record and both Second Appeals are disposed of in terms thereof. The impugned judgments and decrees are accordingly modified. The parties to act upon the compromise pursis as decree. JUDGE *GS.