IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1898 of 2009 SYED IRFAN AHMAD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 06.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. There was no direction in the writ petition for payment of subsistence allowance and, therefore, this Court finds it difficult to entertain any claim with regard to the same on ground of non-compliance by non-payment of the same in contempt jurisdiction. The petitioner may have his remedy with regard to the same in a freshly constituted writ application. The second submission is that the order on the writ petition was served on the authorities on 5.2.2009. In terms of the order passed by this Court, the order of suspension stood revoked with effect from 5.6.2009. That cannot stand altered by any orders passed by the Respondents on a subsequent date giving effect to the directions of this Court. The petitioner states that he joined the place of duty from where he had been suspended on revocation of suspension. His grievance is that subsequently by another order he has been transferred to another place in purported compliance of his joining pursuant to the revocation of suspension under orders of this Court. It is additionally submitted that he is not eligible to be posted at the second place where the Respondents seek to send him. These are matters which can appropriately be 2 examined in any fresh writ application filed by the petitioner questioning the same as the order on the writ petition was limited and specific to the revocation of suspension only which has been done. The application stands dismissed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)