IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 15 OF 2008 MR. BHUSHAN S. NADKARNI ... Applicant Versus MS. MELITA GOES REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN RITA GOES AND2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. J. J. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. M. S. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 24th June, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. J. J. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant/Respondent No.2 in Claim Petition No.334 of 2003 and Mr. M. S. Joshi, learned Counsel on behalf of Respondent No.3 who is Respondent No.4 in the said Claim Petition. The Claimant/Respondent No.1 has chosen to remain absent. Mr. Mulgaonkar, learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant states that the Applicant who is the owner of the vehicle has furnished Bank Guarantee towards the total decretal amount payable under the decree and therefore the execution of the decree be stayed. The above statement is accepted. However, the stay of execution is restricted to the recovery of the decretal amount by the insurer i.e. Respondent No.4 from the insured i.e. Respondent No.2 who is the Applicant herein. Application disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.