IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13274 of 2011 1. MANOJ KUMAR MAHTO 2. UMARAWATI DEVI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of enticing away the minor daughter of the informant. It appears from 164 Cr.P.C., statement of the victim girl that the victim got registered her age as 16 years. Paragraph 1 of the 164 Cr.P.C., suggests that Rajesh took the victim girl from her parents custody after taking the parents’ permission. Paragraph 5 of the 164 Cr.P.C., reflects that the forceful physical relationship was established by Rajesh, though, it appears that these petitioners were also associated with the whole episode. Considering the aforesaid admission of the victim girl, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or 2 surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 125/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)