1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2717 OF 2009 Babar S/o Sattar Mirza Versus The State of Maharashtra *** Mrs. S. S. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. Earlier request of the applicant to enlarge on bail has been withdrawn, by order dated 23rd October, 2008 recorded by brother Judge. However, the learned brother Judge directed the trial Court to dispose of the Sessions Case within six months. It seems the order could not be complied for several reasons. It goes to the credit of counsel representing the Applicant/ accused, who leisurely sought adjournment, though witnesses were present. On few occasions the accused in custody were not produced. However, 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. considering the ground realities, at this stage, it is not possible to entertain bail application on merits particularly considering the nature of allegations. Without adverting more to the details thereof, as the matter is slatted for recording evidence, the application is rejected. 2. The learned Judge shall ensure to complete the trial by 22nd January, 2010. The extension, as sought by the learned Judge, indicated in the letter dated 12th May, 2009, is granted in above terms. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:24/08/2009. ans/