IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH OCTOBER 2008 / 23RD ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 30304 of 2008(G) PETITIONER(S): --------------------------- SUKANAYAMOHAN AGED 21 D/O. T. MOHANAN, SOPANAM, PALACKATHAKIDI P.O., KUNNAMTHANAM VILLAGE,MALLAPPALLY TALUK BY ADV. SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM. BY ADV.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P ( C) No.30304 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who is a Third Year B.Sc. Nursing Student of PVS College of Nursing, Kozhikode, affiliated to the Calicut University, had written her 2nd year Examination held in March 2008. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in March 2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 2nd year Examination held in March 2008, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/- //true copy// P.S. To Judge