(^ "^-o" IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR IC.G.) W.P. (S) N0. {^0\ 2009 B®s Petitioners ...-^ ^y/ CQ^V/ ^'.••^^^' -^ ^/yy>>' ^'^9^ •fv ./' 7 <?- .>;- •&•'•' .^•'' ... 1. Smt. Nirja Tiwari aged 49 years Wife Shri Vishnu Dutta Tiwari, Lecturer (Hindi), 2. Smt. Aarti Ram aged 49 years Wife of Shri Arvind Kumar Rai. Lecturer (English) 3. Smt. Vibha Dwivedi aged 46 years Wife of Shri Krishna Kumar Dwivedi, Lecturer (Chemistry) 4. Smt. E.K.Lal aged 59 years Wife of Moris T.Lal. Lecturer (Hindi) 5.' Smt. Rahi Vashnik aged 61 years Widow of late Shri J.L.Vashnik Lecturer (History) 6. Shri Y.R.Sahu aged 46 years Son of Shri Babulal Sahu Lecturer (Maths) 7. S. P.Tiwari aged 44 years Son of late Shri Ram Krishna Tiwari, Lecturer (Maths) ^ 8. Shri Yogdas Sahu aged 44 years Son ofShri Gurucharan Sahu, Lecturer (Maths) * All working in Multipurpose hligher Secondary School, Rajnandgaon. C.G. • Respondents .. Versus ^srsQlQ KThe State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, ^ D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director of Public Instructions, State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Pension Bada, Bairan Bazar, Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, ^Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 4. Principal, Government Multipurpose, Higher Secondary School, Rajnandgaon CG. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutibn of India. -Al.t^-i nni-ti^i il/»*"^* Ftf ^n/ri·f· 'A- ^ 75T •^I^KI4!, (?'(i1'M41S, fadK-iy ..l.hl:.P:...(;S.)...Ss°i,,l.. SB iHQN'Bia SHRL.HJSTICB^F pediti^usly 28.07.2009 Shri B.P.Rao, counsel for Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. fl Counsel for the petitior^ petition with liberty to file repre| his impugned transfer order d however submits that the said] representation so made expeditic] Counsel for the State ha^ the petitioner is decided by th^ with law. Accordingly, the petition liberty as aforesaid. In th^ representation by the petitioner date of receipt of the copy of tl| decided by the competent period of three weeks from the d^ authojity ^Tsifgiian^i RTriNKBR DIWAKER ;he petitioner. ir the State. er wants to withdraw the present sentation to respondent No.3 against ited 12.7.2009 (Annexure P/l). He authority be directed to decride the no objection if the representation of authority concemed in acoordance is dismissed as withdrawn with the eventuality of filing any such within a period of ten days from tHe ds order, the same is expected to be expeditiously, preferably within a tte of its receipt. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge