r,-;.'>Ts3Bt-3;^^il?!i: <?.A' 2-7;|2-0o^ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASP^R ^^ >.A.(PR)No.212/2007 Singte Bench: Hon'bteShri DiiipRaosahebDeshmukh, J. iharat Dewangan S/o Ramnath Dewangan, aged about 29 years, Occupation-Labour, R/o Sankara, P.S. Berla, Distt-Durg (CG) Dashrath S/o Unknown, aged about mo and ha!f years, minor, guardian mother Geeia Bai D/o Jhadi Ram Geeta Bai D/o Jhadi Ram Yadav, aged about 23 years. Both Rfo Viiiage Sankara, P.S. & Tahsil Berla, District-Durg (CG) fflemorandum of second apDeal under Section 100_o_tC.P.C, Shri Sudhir Verma, counsel for the appeiiant. (Passedonl 9th July, 2007) Learned counsei for the appeilant submitted that he has aiready removed the defauits, as pointed out by the registry. (2) Heard on admission. (3) . The appeiianVplaintiff herein is aggrieved by t'ne judgment dated 28.7.2006 passed by the Additional District Judge, Bemetara in civil appeal No.OI-A/2006, whereby the appea! was dismissed while affirming the judgment and decree passed by th&'Civii Judge, Ciass-S, Bemetara in civil suit No.7-A/2003. ' " (4) The appei the father of the laintiff has prayed befo.re the trial Court that he was not respondenVdefendant No.1 Dashrath. Both the Courts below have, on appreciation of evidence, recorded finding of fact that the appeilant/plaintiff has failed to prove the above Tact. The finding recorded by both the Courts below being a pure finding of fact, no substantiai question of law arises for determination in this appeal. devoid of any merit is dismissed at the stage of be no order as to costs. Sd/- (5) The admission. There sha DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge 1