1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4977/2007 (Ravi & Ors. Vs. State) Date of order : 22.10.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Rakesh Matoria for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application of petitioner No.2 Aashu s/o Madan Lal. The bail application of petitioner No.2 Aashu is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the bail application filed by petitioners No.1 and 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners No.1 and 3 have not inflicted any injury on the person of the injured. This fact has not been disputed by learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of the case diary. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners No.1 and 3 on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners No.(1) Ravi s/o Shyam Lal 2 and (3) Ajay s/o Manish Kumar be released on bail in FIR No.223/2007 P.S. Sadar, Sri Ganganagar, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. vij