y '^\ A '*. 'fs^. •-^..'i,. ^ ^y^- '•*Kcsaa»^, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (Cl No.3623 of 2007 PETITIONERS: RESPONDENTS: (1) Dhansingh S/o Radhuman aged about 50 years. (2) Lakhan S/o Radhuman aged about 48 years. (3) Govind S/o Radhuman aged about 35 years. All R/o Village Ladra, Tahsil Devbhog, District Raipur Versus (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (2) Sarawani Bai W/o Late Chanchal Gond. (3) Dularin Bai D/o Late Chanchal Gond. (4) Hansraj S/o Late Chanchal Gond. (5) Saten Bai D/o Late Chanchal Gond. (6) Radho Ram S/o Govind Gond. Respondent No.2. to 6 R/o Village Ladra, Tah. Devbhog, District Raipur (7) Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gariyabandh, Raipur (C.G.) (8) Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Raipur {Writ petition under Article 227 ofthe Constitution of India} Present: Mr. C.R. Sahu,counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Jhanwar, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents No.1 & 7. None for respondents No.2 to 6 and 8. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble hflr. T.P. Sharma. J ORAL ORDER (2-8-2011) \ \ A 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety ofthe order dated 11- 4-2007 passed by the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur (Circuit Court Raipur) in Revision Revenue Case No.56/A-23/2002-2003 whereby the Board of Revenue has granted permission to review the order dated 22-3-1973 passed by the Collector, Raipur in Revenue Case No.143/A-21/1972-73, to the Collector, Raipur, whereby the Collector has granted permission to sell the land under Section 165 (6) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code,1959. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order jmpugned and copies of other orders & documents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently argued that on the basis of aforesaid permission to sell the land, the petitioners herein i.e. the purchasers have purchased the land and, therefore, granting permission for review would be a futile exercise and would be prejudicial to the interest of the petitioners. 4. After considering the grounds, the Board of Revenue has granted permission to review the order dated 22-3-1973 to the Collector, Raipur. By granting such permission, no prejudice has been caused to the petitioners and the petitioners are still having right to challenge and claim their right and defend themselves before the Collector at the time of hearing on review. 1 do not find any illegality in the order impugned. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Soma Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge