IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 11252 of 2001 Between: 1 Saithana Nageswara Rao S/o.Veeraswamy R/o.Kandrada, Pithapuram Mandal, E.G.District. 2 Smt. Saithana Satyam W/o.Venkata Rao R/o.Kandrada, Pithapuram Mandal, E.G.District. 3 Saithana Bhaskara Rao S/o.Appa Rao R/o.Kandrada, Pithapuram Mandal, E.G.District. 4 Saithana Rama Rao S/o.Appa Rao R/o.Kandrada. 5 Smt.Saithana Balatripura Sundaramma W/o.Varahalarao R/o.Kandrada. 6 Saithana Soorabbaayi S/o.Atchiraju R/o.Kandrada. 7 Saithana Veerabhadra Rao S/o.Nookayya R/o.Kandrada. 8 Pille Varahala Rao S/o.Chinna Rao R/o.Kandrada. 9 Saithana Krishna Rao S/o.Chinna Ramaswamy R/o.Kandrada. 10 Marisey Appalaraju S/o.Chinna Venkataswamy Kandrada. 11 Smt. Pille Seethayamma W/o.Mallayya R/o.Kandrada. 12 Smt.Marisey Venkateswara Rao S/o.Thamma Rao Kandrada. 13 Saithana Gavaraju S/o.Venkatareddy R/o.Kandrada. 14 Saithana Venkataraju S/o.Venkatareddy R/o.Kandrada. 15 Saithana Bulleyya S/o.Venkata Raju R/o.Kandrada. 16 Saithana Venkateswar Rao S/o.Satyanarayana R/o.Kandrada. 17 Yapati Rama Rao S/o.Ayyanna @ Bulli Abbayi R/o.Kandrada. 18 Yapati Bhaskararao S/o.Ayyanna @ Bulli Abbayi R/o.Kandrada. 19 Pille Rama Rao S/o.Kamaraju R/o.Kandrada. 20 Pille Maheswara Rao S/o.Ramarao R/o.Kandrada. 21 Pille Suryanarayana S/o.Kamaraju Kandrada. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Tenancy Tribunal (Special Officer cum Junior Civil Judge) Pithapuram, E.G.Dist. 2 M.S.N.Charities, Jagannaikpur, Kakinada, Rep.by its Executive Officer, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to examine the records in ATC No.23/2000 on the file of the 1st respondent and issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ, direction or order, directing the 1st respondent not to proceed with the enquiry in the said case holding that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the same as held by this Hon'ble Court in W.A.No.514/97 and batch dt.24-4- 2001. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NARSIMHMAM KROVIDI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11252 of 2001 ORAL ORDER : Sri S.Sridhar, counsel representing Sri Narsimham Krovidi, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 03-06-2009 Msr HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11252 of 2001 03-06-2009 Msr