IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.19737 of 2008 Between: Nellore Venka Reddy, S/o. Sankara Reddy, R/o. Plot No.22, First Floor, Model Colony, S.R.Nagar (P.O), Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P. Represented by The District Collector, Nellore. 2 The Land Reforms Tribunal, Nellore Represented by Revenue, Divisional Officer, Nellore. 3 Special Tahsildar(Land Reforms), Nellore. 4 The Revenue Divisional officer, Kavali, Nellore District. 5 The Tahsildar, Bogle Mandal, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction particularly Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the petition ﬁled by the third respondent in C.C.No.1981/NLR/75 and C.C.No.1983/NLR/75 on 13-4- 1994 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.N.NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.19737 of 2008 ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that though the third respondent – Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) Nellore made an application before the second respondent – Land Reforms Tribunal, Nellore on 13.04.1994 in C.C.No.1981/NLR/75 and C.C.No.1983/NLR/75, the same is not being disposed of so far. Today, when the matter is called, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, reported that the application ﬁled by the third respondent is still pending before the second respondent, and therefore, instead of this Court going int o merits of the matter, the second respondent may be directed to dispose of the application ﬁled by the third respondent expeditiously, for which course of action, the learned counsel for the petitioner has also agreed. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to dispose of the applications ﬁled by the third respondent which are pending before him since 1994, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 24.10.2008 va/msv