WP(C) 4789/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. D Das, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B Ghosh, lear ned government advocate. The writ petitioner’s case is that he was settled with Joypur Sa nd and Stone Mahal No.2 for the period 31.08.2009 to 10.08.2011. However, during this period, the petitioner could not extract forest products to the fullest ex tent due to intervention of construction of bridge over the Beki river and Natio nal Highway project. Hence, the petitioner is praying for a direction to the res pondents to extend the lease period as provided under Rule 21 (3) of the Assam S ales of Forest Produce Coupes and Mahal rules, 1977. Apparently, the petitioner has submitted a representation for t he aforesaid relief to the Divisional Forest Officer on 06.05.2011. Subsequent t hereto also few more representation were submitted. However, the petitioner has not received any reply. Today the government advocate submitted that the represe ntation has been forwarded to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests for con sideration. Hence, the aforesaid authority is directed to consider the r epresentation in accordance with law within a period of 4(four) weeks from the p roduction of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed o f.