CRM No. M 6140 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 6140 of 2011 Date of decision: 09.05.2011 Natha Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Rajeev K Kapila, Advocate for the petitioners Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for respondents NO. 5 to 7 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to register a case under Section 307, 323, 506, 34 IPC against respondents No. 5 to 7 and 2-3 unidentified persons who launched murderous assault on the son of the petitioner and threw him in the fields taking him to be dead and hand over the investigation of the case to the Special Investigation Team. Reply has been filed. In para 4 of the reply, it is mentioned that as per the MLR, offence under Section 323, 506, 34 IPC is made out which CRM No. M 6140 of 2011 2 are non-cognizable offences and the complainant was directed to seek remedy from competent court of law. Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that as per the MLR, there is injury on the neck which is stated to be with a rope. As such, the said injury is corroborated from the complaint (P1) made by the petitioner to the SSP Amritsar. As per the said complaint, the petitioner's son was thrown in the wheat field after tying his arms and legs and strangulated him. Thereafter, he was only rescued after 20-25 motorcycles and Son and Sukha cut the rope around his neck with a datar. As such, respondents had tried to kill him by putting a rope around the neck. However, the said representation is not dated. In view of the above, the SSP (Rural), Amritsar is directed to look into the DDR, representation and the MLR and take appropriate action, if need be and in accordance with law. A copy of the order be supplied to the learned State counsel under the signatures of the Reader of this Court for its further compliance. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 09.05.2011 mohan