IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4991 of 2008 NATHU THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.5.2008 Learned counsel is permitted to make necessary correction with regard to court’s name in paragraph-5 and the prayer portion of the application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is father in law of the victim lady. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 29.9.2007. He is a poor barber and earns his livelihood by cutting hair of people. He submitted that the daughter of the informant was ill. She was under treatment of a doctor but unfortunately she could not survive. In this connection he referred to paragraph-38 of the case diary and submitted that there is statement of one - 2 - witness that the deceased was suffering from stomach pain. Learned counsel pointed out that the husband of the deceased lady has now surrendered in the court below. Learned counsel for the informant, on the other hand, opposed the bail and submitted that there is evidence in the case diary to show that the petitioner and his family members committed dowry death of the deceased lady. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely Nathu Thakur is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rakesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, in G.R.no. 767/06/Tr.no.2476/08 arising out of Aurai P.S. case no. 30/06. AI (M.Saran, J)