(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3705 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3705 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3705 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1036 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1036 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1036 OF 2005 M/s. Abhinav Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. Ramesh Cheddha i/b Uday Shankar Samudralal, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M.S. Mohite, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. Sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay in filing criminal Application No.3706 of 2005, hence delay is condoned. 3. Application is disposed of. ***** (-2-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3706 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3706 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3706 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1036 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1036 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1036 OF 2005 M/s. Abhinav Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. Ramesh Cheddha i/b Uday Shankar Samudralal, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M.S. Mohite, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 28TH JUNE, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicants are seeking restoration of Criminal Application No. 1036 of 2005 which was dismissed on 25.4.2005 by Lordship Justice V.M. Kanade. Looking to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this, I am of the opinion that it would be appropriate that this application be placed before Lordship Justice V.M. Kanade. 3. Office to take necessary steps. (-3-) *****