BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14021 of 2011 1. T. ASHOKAN 2. KALAISELVI 3. M. MARIAYAYE ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KARUR DT, CR NO. NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. JANA LAW ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard M/s.Jona Law Associates, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the state. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they did not commit any crime as stated in the complainant. He would submit that due to civil dispute, they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that they are also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners. 5. however, the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such they are having apprehension of arrest. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioners, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 7. Accordingly the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrte concerned on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.I, Karur and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. 8. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days failing which the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KARUR 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, KARUR DISTRICT, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. JANA LAW ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.41654 GH : 02.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14021 of 2011 Date :28/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/