IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 35453 of 1997 Between: 1 N.Surya Prakasa Rao, S/o Ganaga Raju, Hindu R/o Kitikesavaram, Korukonda Mandal 1, East Godavari Distirct. 2 Isukapalli Raja Rao, S/o Atchutaramaiah,Hindu, R/o Korukonda Village and Mandal, East Godavari Distirct. 3 Ch.Rama Raju, S/o Lakshminarasimham, R/o Jangareddygudem East Godavari Distirct. 4 Y.V.S.Reedy, S/oVenkata Reddy, R/o Jangareddygudem Krishna District. East Godavari Distirct. 5 C.Janardhna Rao, S/o. Gopayya, R/o Jaggayypet East Godavari Distirct. 6 K.Prasad, S/o Purshothama Rao, R/o Jaggayypet Krishna District. 7 B.Ranga Babu, S/o Koteswara Rao, R/o Jaggayypet, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3 The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Kakinada. 4 The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Eluru, Wast Godavari Distirct. 5 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Dowleswaram, East Godavari Distirct. 6 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 7 The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Department, Guntur. 8 The Executive Engineer, Market Division, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 10 The Executive Engineer, R & B Divisional, Vijayawada, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the respondent in not issuing the tender schedules to the works contracts to the petitioners herein as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and for a consequential direction the respondent to issue tender from the petitioners with out insisting them to produce the Commercial Tax Clearance Certificate. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.N.SIVA REDDY Counsel for Respondents : G.P. FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA, J Date: 1.4.2005 DA/SVV To 1 The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3 The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Kakinada. 4 The Superintending Engineer, R & B Circle, Eluru, Wast Godavari Distirct. 5 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Dowleswaram, East Godavari Distirct. 6 The Superintending Engineer, I & C.A.D. Irrigation Circle, Hyderabad. 7 The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 8 The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Department, Guntur. 9 The Executive Engineer, Market Division, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 10 The Executive Engineer, R & B Divisional, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 11 Two CCs to the G.P. for G.P. for Panchayat Raj, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 12 Two CD copies.