CRM No.M-9072 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM No.M-9072 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.05.2011 **** Jaibir . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Haryana . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Narender Sura, Advocate for petitioner Mr. HS Deol, Addl. AG Haryana **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The prayer in this petition is for enlargement of the petitioner in case FIR No.127 dated 21.02.2011 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act registered at PS City Gurgaon. (2). As per the allegations contained in the FIR, the petitioner admittedly possessed a licensed revolver which was said to have been given by him to one Parvez who accompanied the members of a gang as their ‘personal security officer’. This gang of youngsters and one 65-year woman used to inspire confidence amongst the CRM No.M-9072 of 2011.doc - 2 – prospective buyers to sell the property by impersonation which was admittedly not owned by them. (3). The petitioner was arrested on 02.03.2011 and is in judicial custody since then. (4). Prima facie, it appears that the petitioner is not being alleged to be a member of the gang. (5). Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Harmesh Chand, states that the investigation is complete though challan is yet to be presented which shall be presented within a week. (6). Owing to all the attending circumstances and the fact that the conclusion of the Magisterial trial will take more time, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (7). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 10.05.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge