THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No. 12153 of 1999 ORDER: On 24.6.2010 when this case appeared for final hearing Sri P.Nageswara Sree, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent – Management has reported that an amicable settlement has been worked out between the workman/employees and the 2nd respondent – Management. Therefore, there was no necessity for examining the correctness or otherwise of the award rendered by the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad in ID No. 11 of 1995. Today a representation is made on behalf of Sri G.Vidya Sagar, that there are no such instructions received. But, however, since this is an old writ petition and since the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent – Management has asserted that the dispute has already been amicably settled, I see no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made by the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. This matter has already undergone more than 10 adjournments. Therefore, I am not inclined to adjourn this case any further. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, the writ petition is dismissed. But, however, without costs. -------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J knk 1st July 2010