fe^ ^w ^- y" HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BI1ASPUR W.P. (81 No.7358 of 2007 PETITIONBR RBSPONDBMTS Raghuaath Prasad Siaha, 37 years, s/6 Shri Babu Lal Sinha, Assistant Teacher, Govt Primaiy' School DiUppur, Block KUaBagarh, dMtnct Rajiiandgaoa(CG) Versus The Stete Govemmeat of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Education & Tribal Departtnent, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) Thc District Educadon Offlcer, Rajnandgaon (CG) WRIT PBTnnQN UMDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQMSTITUTION OFINDIA Appearaace: Shri Somkant Verma, Gounsel for the petitioner. Sbri Pradeep Singh, Lawyer for the State on advaace copy. ORALORDBR (12.12.2007) SUNIL KUMAR 8IMHA. J Heard on adnussion. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subuuts that fhe petitioner has passed B.T.I. examination on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitied to reeeive two advance incremeuts accoiding to Circulars dated24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that ia mauy identical miatters, the petttions have been allpwed in terms of the order passed in. the case of YetShwcint KvuMir BHwattwed Vs. JWuntctoal Gorpamiion. Ihtrn und anather{2QQ6 OS SSPJR-CG 96t. He submits that fhe case ofthe petitioner is squarely covered by fhe said judgment This legal position is not disputed by fhe learaed counsel for the State. However, he submlts fhat the order may be passed ia terms of the said judgment, but it sliall be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such quaUfication. Accordingly, this writ petition is aUcwed in terms of the order passed iu case of Yashwant Kumccr Bharadwaj Vs. SSurndpql Corporcction, Durg ccnd another (Supra) subject to verification of the factsas to wbether the petitioner had acqulrcd B.T.I. .Examiaation Certificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aud furfher whefher he has been paid two advance iacreinents or not The petition staads finally disposed o£No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Suiha Judse L_._._ Sunita <;-' }