ss —7S t^^ <RI^f VI R-fifi W an^t shiw ~s^ ^ww^, w\i\wiis, [sicfi'y^ *ii*ini a»*iiq»——•••--••—•—•-•-•^^ 200 3ii^T'<ra^ (iyfj«i<{t() WIIW^te3lA5I W.P.( PBTITIONER Parmanar aged aboi Pump Hoi Vereiu RBSPONDBNTS 1 4. State of Departmi Pichada Raipur (C Cominisi Anusuch Vibhag, Assistanl Jati, Vibhag, Collector WRIT PBTXTION U; jd Gupta, S/o. Late Shri Ishwar Gupta, )t -66 years, R/o. Kelo Vihar, Opposite ^se (67/2400), Distt. Raigarh (CG) Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary jftt of Adim Jati, Anusuohit Jati Aywam |Varg Kalyan Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, |oner, Department of Adim Jati, |t Jati Aywam Pichada Varg Kalyan t.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Commissioner, Department of Adim jati Aywam Pichada Varg Kalyan pistt. Raigarh (CG) Distt. Raigarh (CG) IDER ARTICLB 226 OF THB Anulsuchit CONST SB:HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA 02-02-2009 Shri Vioay Pandey, coun Shri Paakaj Shnvastava, Heard. The petitioner has filed Annexure P-1 dated 25.1.2QO' wrongly fixed the Teave encashfaient Leamed counsel for fh| retired fiTom. his services on 31, Taraimal, Distt. Raigarh. The from the date of his mitial respondent aufhorities hav^ 'nnltiili WTCTf <f ^st <[»I*!;K ^T3ffifIT3II^T tli£o^630/2009 TUTION OF INDIA BISHRA icl for fhe petitioner. Paael Lawyer for the State. fhe iastaat petition against fhe order of !, whereby fhe respondent aufhorily has uent' offhe petitioner. petitioner subinits fhat fhe petitioner 1.2002 as a Principal ofGovt. High School stitioner is eatifled for leave encashinent ppointment i.e 24.11.1965, whereas the wrongly calciilated the same w.e.f ^ fv""~ :—78 Sf^l VI l<-fi<* WT ^TT^T s(i*iicti J. 'S^ '*\miv\<i, w^wie, [^v\wy. ~ ^ire^iTtRttra?"""""""""""""""""""""" "w^200 SII^T'T^T (ljclf'lel<^:I) TOIIW ^lft^ CT^I -2- 30.6.1973. He furfher subinits been granted teave encashjnent finm. the date of fheir initial 'ap'pointinent :The petitioner 4as made several representations to the resppndeut aufhorities ia this considered. Learaed counsel for the the petitionermaybe referred t^ fhe High Power Retiral Dues Coininittee, coustituted by fhe State as p^r directions of this Court, wifh a furtfier direction to decide grievance of Leamed couusel appeari^ig for the State submits fhat in case fhe petitioner submits copy ofthis ofA.G. withia a period of3 day of5ce to thc Higti Power Retira( shatl decide grievance of fhe pj fhe date ofreceipt ofreference. In view of above subiuid wifh a direction to the petitio^ wifh aiuiexures in the bffice of days fix)m today, who, in tum,| Contmittee for Retiral Dues of receipt of copy pf fhis orde^ qil<l[<Tl<^1 tTR^Tf ^f t^St ^f3T^I< ^sifaTsii^i |that fhe similarly situated employees have regard, however, the same have not be petitioner subinits that the grievance of fhe petitioner withia a speci&ed period. Ipetition alongwifh atuaexures iu fhe office ^, ttie saiue shaU be forwarded by the A.G. Dues CoHunittee aud the said Coininittee titioner wittun a period of 4 nionths froin sions, the iustant petition is disposed of ;r to subinit a copy of fhis petition along Advocate Geneial (CG) within a period of3 shaU. fbmrard fhe same to the H^h Power forthwith and the said Conunittee shaU decide fhe dispute withuu a fu^fher period offour uionths fium. fhe date along wifh copy of the petition fium. fhe ofiice of Advocate General, aft^r affordiag opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge j|