- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.185 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.185 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.185 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.356 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.356 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.356 OF 2006 Suman Raghla Pardhi ...Applicant vs. 1.The State, U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli 2. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents Mr.C.M.Kothari for the Applicant Mr.D.A.Nalawade for Union of India Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 7,2006. : OCTOBER 7,2006. : OCTOBER 7,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate appearing for the Applicant and Shri Nalawade for the first Respondent. I have perused the impugned judgments and notes of evidence. The conviction of the applicant is under sections 304-A and 337 of the Indian Penal Code. The maximum substantive sentence is of two months. The Applicant was on bail throughout the trial and during the pendency of the Appeal. Hence, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2. Hence, I pass the following order : i) The Applicant shall be enlarged on the same bail on which he was enlarged during the pendency of trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE