IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-3498 of 2010 Date of Decision:6.4.2010 Parveen Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no recovery was effected from the petitioner. The only recovery i.e. 1 kg. of heroin was effected from the co-accused namely Jaswant Singh. Reliance has been placed on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau 2008(2) RCR (Criminal)597 to contend that admittedly as per the FSL report, the quantity of Diacetyl morphine was 22.90% which would amount to 230 grams in the present case. The same is non commercial quantity. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar. 6.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE