IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27757 of 2011 Bidya Bhushan Sahay S/O Sri Srikant Sahay R/O Mohalla Gandhinagar Ramana Motihari, P.S.+Distt.- Motihari(East Champaran), At Present Junior Engineer, P.W.D. Dept. , Gopalganj. ------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ****** With Criminal Miscellaneous No.17208 of 2011 Indu Shekhar Jha, S/o - Late Kashinath Jha, resident of village – Balba, P.S. – Nauhatta, District – Saharsa, presently posted as Works Inspector, P.H.E.D. at Nawuhatta Blok, P.S. – Nauhatta, District – Saharsa. -------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar --------Opposite Party ****** 03. 17.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 86/2010, for offences under Sections 408/409/120B of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case with allegation of non- furnishing with details and adjustment of advance of sum of Rs. 47,000/- (in Cr. Misc. No. 17208/2011) and 4375/- (in Cr. Misc. No. 27757/2011) which is still to be adjusted. Submission is that petitioners have at several occasions approached for accounting and adjustment of money so taken in advance. However, subject to result of the case, ready to deposit the amount of Rs. 47,000/- (in Cr. Misc. No. 17208/2011) and 4375/- (in Cr. Misc. No. 27757/2011) is claimed due. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of conditional deposit before the court below of such amount and in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 86/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for one year or till accounting, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)