CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33168 OF 2000 ---- In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. ---- 1. M/S INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL, SARITA VIHAR, SARITA VIHAR, DELHI-MATHURA ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 044 THROUGH A.K. SINGHAL, GENERAL MANAGER CUM COMPANY SECRETARY, INDRAPRASTHA MEDICAL CORPORATION LTD. 2. DR. ARUN SETHI, SON OF DR. A.R. SETHI (LATE), SR. CONSULTANT, DEPARTMENT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL, R/O C-2 MAHARANI BAGH, NEW DELHI – 110 065. 3. DR. REENA SETHI, W/O DR. ARUN SETHI, VISITING CONSULTANT, DEPARTMENT OF OPTHALMOLOGY INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL, R/O C-2 MAHARANIBAGH, NEW DELHI – 110 065. ... ... PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. BHAGYAMANI MANDAL, W/O LATE SHRI R.P. MANDAL, R/O RANIRAJ 1, JUSTICE MANDAL PATH, POLICE STATION SHASTRI NAGAR, PATNA – 23. ... ... OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---- For the Petitioners : None For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, A.P.P. ---- P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ---- Rakesh Kumar,J. Today again, when the case was called out, none appeared on behalf of petitioners either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment, though Sri Shailendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is present. In this case, repeatedly, no one is appearing on behalf of petitioners. On 27.7.2010 also, none had come 2 forward on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition, though learned counsel for opposite party no.2 was present. However, the case was adjourned for a day with an indication that no further adjournment shall be granted. While adjourning the case on 27.7.2010, it was noticed that in the case, order of stay was continuing since 21.3.2002. 2. Three petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for setting aside the order dated 13.6.2000 passed by Shri D.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna in Complaint Case No.419(C) of 2000. By the said order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of offence under Section 418 read with Section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 3. I have perused the impugned order. I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for exercising inherent jurisdiction in favour of the petitioners. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected. 5. In view of rejection of this petition, interim order of stay dated 3 21.3.2002 and 6.5.2003 stands automatically vacated. 6. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.) PATNA HIGH COURT Dated 4.8.2010 N.A.F.R./N.H.