IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-12100 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.7.2011 Rattan Lal ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Haryana ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. S.N. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Addl. Advocate General Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. On 12.5.2011, on the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to join investigation and pay the balance amount due to the investors, interim stay of arrest was granted to the petitioner. On July 15, 2011 as learned counsel for the petitioner sought more time to pay the amount due to the investors, the case was adjourned for today. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he offered ` 1,81,000/- to the investors but the same was not accepted. Learned counsel for the State submitted that amount due is ` 2,82,000/- which the petitioner did not pay. Considering the conduct of the petitioner, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 29.7.2011 Judge Meenu