<D SINGLE BENCH ^/S^ i0^>/L BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. /_/^ C~2- /2009 Petitioner RESPONDENTS Laxmi Prasad Bareth, aged about 37 years, son of Shri Firtu Ram Bareth, occupation - Service, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal Primary School - Kamosindand, Vikas Khand Dharamjaigarh Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribe Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, Distt. Raigarh (CG) 3. Block Education Officer, Vikas Khand - Dharamjaigarh, Distt.Raigarh (CG) 4. Block Education Officer, Vikas Khand - Kartala, Distt. Korba (CG) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, :C—78 ^^ .^v D ^Il^l ^? f^lte ^?T 3??t^? ^i^i^ ^ 's^ "L)i^i<n^, y^i-<H<Ko, fsj^iyy W^^te-^-£-c5->--^-5s^.200') ^!^?T T?^T ( ^I^®1^) / ^RHW^f^^T^T ~SB : HON'BLBSHRI JUSTICE ^Frf^f4N T?PT^f ^* fe^ il^^K ^" 3?Rm a^i 03.08.2009 Shri A.N.Bhakta . counsel foi Shri Shashank Thakur, P.L. Challenge in the present 30.6.2009 (Annexure P/1} passed petitioner who is working as Assisl from Govt. Tribal Primary Dharamjaigarhy District Raigarh tc Block Kartala, distt. Korba. The main contention of coU petitioner is wprking as Assistantj INKBR DIWAKBR Assistant Teachers is being maintdined district wise and on account of shifting of the petitioner^ his senlority will be adversefy affected. Contention of counsel for t make a representation to the respo decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petitioner However he submits that till hi^ representation is decidedy the petitioner may be given some prote<| petitioner to make a representatiosj the date of receipt pf the copy c| decided within a period of three we<| the petitioner. Forthe State. petition is to the order dated oy respondent No.l, by which the :ant Teacher has been transferred School, Kkamosidand, Bloak Govt. Primary School Barkonha^ nsel for the petitioner is that the Teacher and the seniority of the le State is that let the petitioner ident No. 1 and the same would be agrees to make a representation. Aive order. Accordingly, the petition is ^lisposed of with a direction to the within a period of ten days frcan this order^ the same would be ;ks from the date of its receipt. Till then the impugned order shall not \>e given effect to. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge