Civil Writ Petition No. 12876 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 12876 of 2011 Date of decision:22nd July, 2011 Attar Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12877 of 2011 Krishan Kumar and another ........Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12878 of 2011 Naresh Kumar and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ......Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12879 of 2011 Om Parkash and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12880 of 2011 Bhim Singh and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12876 of 2011 2 Civil Writ Petition No. 12881 of 2011 Har Narain and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12882 of 2011 Baljit Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents Civil Writ Petition No. 12883 of 2011 Randhir Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. J.K.Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral) This order will dispose of 8 writ petitions bearing Nos. 12876 to 12883 of 2011, involving similar question of law and facts. For facility of reference, facts are being mentioned from CWP No. 12876 of 2011. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acqusition Act, Civil Writ Petition No. 12876 of 2011 3 1894 (in short, the Act) on 18.10.2002 and 14.10.2004 respectively. Notice of motion. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State of Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the dispute in this case is squarely covered by ratio of the judgment passed in CWP No. 11021 of 2011 titled as Nafe Singh and others versus State of Haryana and others decided on 7.07.2011. Learned State counsel failed to rebut the contention raised by the counsel for the petitioners. In view of the above fact, all the above mentioned writ petitions are disposed of in the same terms as in the case of Nafe Singh (supra). Petitioners are directed to appear before the High Powered Committee at Mini Secretariat, Sector 17, Chandigarh on 25.07.2011 at 11:30 AM. The High Powered Committee shall then pass an order without being influenced by anything said by this Court and in terms of an order passed by this Court in CWP No. 10845 of 2004 on 16.07.2005. [JASBIR SINGH] JUDGE [AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH] JUDGE 22nd July, 2011 Shivani Kaushik