IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3842 of 2010 ANITA DEVI Versus MURARI PRASAD & ANOTHER. ----------- 2 05.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sufficient explanation has been furnished to explain that while taking steps for notice within time limitation petition was not included in the requisites for notice due to mistake of the advocate’s clerk. In the facts of the case, the prayer for restoration is allowed and M.A. No. 670 of 2009 is restored to its original file on the condition that steps for notice in the limitation matter shall also be taken by ordinary process within one week from today failing which this order of restoration shall stand recalled. AKV/- (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)