1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE MOTION NO.3374 OF 2005 IN APPEAL NO.510 OF 2002 IN LAND ACQUISITION REFERENCE NO.1 OF 1999 IN CASE NO.LAW C.S. 4/1990 Zarina Ashrafali Jairajbhai Appellant vs. The Special Land Acqn.Officer, MHADA & anr. Respondents Mr.Milind Jadhav i/b.M/s.Solomon & Co. for the appellant. Mr.M.D.Naik, A.G.P. for the applicant/respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 19th December 2005 P.C. The notice of motion is wholly misconceived and liable to be rejected and we reject the same accordingly. If any finding recorded in the judgment dated 8th March 2002 is adverse to the respondent, they have to challenge the same in accordance with law but not by way of notice of motion as they have sought to do. 2. With the aforesaid observations, notice of motion is dismissed. (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, (R.M.LODHA, J.) J.) J.) (D. (D. (D. G. KARNIK, J.) G. KARNIK, J.) G. KARNIK, J.)