:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 205 OF 2007 IN IN IN FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2006 COURT APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2006 COURT APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2006 Kawaljeet Kaur Mikha Bedi ..Applicant V/s Milkha Singh Bedi .. Respondent. Ms Manjiri S. Parasnis for the applicant Mr. S.N. Bhosale for the respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND : J.N. PATEL AND A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 : 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2007 P.C. . Heard. The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent to the application for condonation of delay. The application for condonation of delay really makes out a case that the applicant could not move the Court in the matter due to lack of funds and access to forum and was required to approach the Legal Services Authority in the matter. It is after that she moved this Court by preferring this appeal, which is filed after the delay of more than 500 days. In our view, taking into consideration that applicant was financially incapacitated, to prepare an appeal and obtain legal aid she could not be deprived from seeking justice. Therefore, we condone the delay. The apeal be registered and listed for admission in the next week. ( J.N. PATEL, J.) J.N. PATEL, J.) J.N. PATEL, J.) ( A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.) A.A. SAYED, J.)