^ ^ 1 Roop Kumar Yadu, Aged 45 years, S/o Late Shri Raxngulam. Yadu, Govt. Middle School, Dapka 2 Sagar Siagli Baghel, Aged 44 years, S/o Late Shri Arjun Sin.gh Baliel, Govt. Middle School, Baldeopur 3 Manohar Singh KaushiSi, Aged 40 years, S/o Late Shri Toraa Sin.gh Kausliik, Primaiy School, Riwagaliaii, 4 Khuman Singh Thakiu-, Aged 34 years, S/o Shyam Singh Thakur, Middle School, Gadliaghat, (C.G.) 5 Harendra Kuiaar Saliu aged 40 years Soa of late Shri Shyaru lal Sahu, Prmianr Scbool, Kalkasa 6 Shnmati Saiidhya Siugh, Aged 40 years, W/o Shri Prashaiit Baliadur Singh, Primary School, Khauiariakhurd 7 Bhai'at Shrivastava, Aged 56 years, S/o Shri Maklianlal Shrivastava, Girls Piimary School, Kairagarh 8 Shrimati Pushplata Shrivastava, Aged 50 years, W/o Late Shri Bharat lal Shrivastava, Middle School Sadar Bazar, Rajnandgaon 9 Omant Smgh, Aged 49 years, S/o SIiri Raa Bahadur Singh, Middle School, Muska 10 Jakir Ali Saiyad, Aged 35 years, S/o La.tc Shri Masuk Ali Ssuyad, Priinarv School, Kodhe Nawagaon 11 Nikliil Kumar Smgh, Aged 34 years, S/o Raj Singh Chalukya, Primaiy School, Sarragondi 12 Geeta Yadav, Aged 38 years, W/o Shri ChhabUal Yadav, Middle School, Jalbaudha 13 Lokesh Yadava aged 39 years Son of late Shri Latel Ram. Yadava, Pniuary School, Pipariya 14 Kayum. Qureshi aged 38 years S/o late Gulam Rrmiaiy School, Saliha ^ W.P.IS) _Np._o61_3/2007 ^- 15 Shrmiati Mukta Mani Ghosh aged 42 years wife Qf Shri Aaiit GIiosh, Govem;ment Adarsh Hr. Secondaiv School, Durg. AU Assistaiit Teachers, District Rajnaiidgaon, Petitioner no. 15 DistrictDurg (C.G.l 1 The State Govei-Dllieiit Chliatusgarh, Through Secretaiy, Education Departinent,. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2 The Distdct Education OSicer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.l 3 The District Education Officer, Dur^ (C.G.) Shri Ajay Sbrivastava, couasel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay D%T.vedi, Paael La-nTyer for fhe State on advaiice copy^ Heard on adiaission. Leamed couasel for fhe petitioners subinits that the petitionei's have passed D.Ed. exaiauiatiQU oa fbeir o'mi expenses, fherefore, fhey are entiUed to receive tavo advance iacreiaents accordtag. to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aiid 01.03.1999. He also subiuits that in niaiiy identical niattei-s, fhe petitions have been atlowed in ternis of the order passed iu fhe case of 'yashu/tint Kum.ar Bhara.duMi 7s. Munidsjed Corsacrcation, Bury an& another {2006 ffS 5IPJS-CG 96}. He subiaits fliat the case of fhe petitioners is squarely covered by the said Judeiaent. •^ W.P.fS) No, 0613/2007 TMs legal position is not disputed by fhe learaed counsel for the State. However, he subinits fhat fhe order inay be passed in terms of fhe said judginent, but it shaU be subjected to verification regardnig petitioners' such qualification. Accordiiigly, this w~rit petition is aUowed in terms of fhe order passed ia case of Yashwant Kum.ar Bharadzuaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of tlie facts as to whefher tlic petitioners had acquired D.Ed. Exainination Ccrtificates on fheir own expeases as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whefh.er ttiey have been paid tavo advauce iiicreBieiits or not. The petition' stands fmally disposed of. No orier as to costs. • ; --~—-.-. i SdA SunilKumarSinha Judge vatti B i ' '^