IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.17127 of 2005 Date of Decision:- 05.03.2009 Raj Kumar ....Petitioner(s) vs. The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court, Ambala and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Ajai Nara, Advocate for the respondent No.2-Board. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the respondent has placed on record the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board had challenged the Division Bench judgment passed by this Court in C.W.P.No.14737 of 2003 decided on 16.9.2003 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has accepted the appeal preferred by the Board and has set aside the order passed by this Court. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly states that the writ petition itself does not survive and, therefore, it has no merit therein. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1271 of 2006 The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board vs. Subhash Chand and another, decided on 24.2.2006, the present writ petition stands dismissed in the same terms. C.W.P.No.17127 of 2005 -2- Counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents are taking different stands in different cases and certain workmen are still working whose cases have been decided against them whereas petitioners have been deprived of this right. She further contends that even Subhash Chand is still working. The Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, is directed to look into the matter and take appropriate steps in accordance with law. March 05, 2009 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE Whether referred to Reporters ________ Yes/No