1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.4551 of 2006 Sheetal Shardul Bhosale Applicant Vs. Shardul Bharat Bhosale & ors. Respondents Mr.Shahid Azmi for applicant. Ms.R.M.Gadhvi, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. January 19, 2007. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant - wife. The respondents have been released on anticipatory bail by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge vide his order dated 4/11/2006. This application has been filed praying for cancellation of the said anticipatory bail. . The respondent no.1 is the husband of the applicant while the respondent nos.2 and 3 are his parents. The respondent no.1 is a Seaman and most part of the year he is on the ship. . Having regards to the complaint the applicant lodged with the Senior Inspector of Police, Dahisar Police Station on 20/10/2006, her allegations are 2 that she was misled into the marriage by giving false qualifications of her husband, the in-laws are demanding Rs.5 lakhs, they are not allowing her to pursue her career and they are ill-treating her. Consequently she left the matrimonial home and demanded the articles of Stridhan. They are not being returned by the in-laws. . The learned Addl. Sessions Judge rightly considered the allegations in the FIR and recorded that custodial interrogation of the accused was not warranted. The order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge cannot be termed as perverse or illegal or unjust on the face of the allegations the applicant has set out in her complaint to the police station. . Hence the application is rejected. (B.H