ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2751 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.2751 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.2751 OF 2008 Dayanand Changdev Zende ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. None for the Petitioner. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : BILAL : BILAL : BILAL NAZKI & NAZKI & NAZKI & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. The Petitioner had made an application for grant of parole on the ground that his father was getting operated. The application was rejected on the ground that the date of operation was not given. Obviously, the date of operation would not be given because of the absence of the prisoner. Now, we are not sure as to whether the Petitioner still needs parole to attend to his father or not. 2. While disposing this Writ Petition, we allow the Petitioner to make a fresh application and ( 2 ) if such application is made, that shall be decided within a period of two weeks. The Jail Authorities shall communicate this order to the Prisoner. 3. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.)