TN TH WP (227) NoHLKz /2008 PETlTlON U/ART. 227 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON Petitioner / x/ S. Ramarao,48 Yr. Applicant S/o Late S. Samundarlu, Padumnagar, PS Bhilai — 3, Durg VERSUS Respondents/ /1. Baldeo Singh 30 Yrs., Non — Applicants S/o Rodul Singh Sikh, Vill. Landera, Munga (Pun) 4/‘ / 2. Mukhtyar Singh 60 yrs. i‘ghan S/o Late Mastan Singh, Panchgrahi Bazaar, \7\ é gx9w Masjid Road, 842 Sec. «5% ,n / 181 Faridabad (Halt) /3 Branch Manager,n ‘ The New India Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Nandini Road, Power House, Bhilai, Distt. Durg —‘W.\ ,mi’muw . WEE» m W290 gm‘afgam WWwfwW ,- $3ifvmana‘a $3: gm. $§mx wmzw :mxn gagzwgmg 2&—?-z@m ianu Raja Sharma, Ac‘woca s, —F Lo " +Lha petiiiona‘. $hri Sudhir Agra-Laval Adm, for thé 1‘6Spend6nt‘ No. 3 Jorm appsars I01“ the raspondérm No. 1 emd 3 L€"- 1 ei‘i comma} for the pafti€s submit Ehai Q’s matzar cal b6 haeard éiLsiéy. Thertf 1‘6, ward iinally. The instant pgtitioa is dh~ec$€t1 agains: £116 o‘rdw dmsz‘z 103—2008 paSs€d by 8th Rdditicnal Momr Vahicks Tribunal, D‘zrg in Exacution Case N 3. 20?] 2094-. Brief facts 0f €116 vase 8:56 ma: ax award mas beer; 1w. passad by Earned Tribur‘a} in CEaim Case No. 297/2904 an 29-11-2304 whereby an d‘mount 0f R5. 4,45,665,’— 1as been awarded if; iavom‘ of the petitioner / claimant aleng with interes’r at the rate of 6% per aimum, whh a specific directim‘i them. if the 33101111: awarded is 1101' paid within 2 months {hell the mterest shaé} Qe payable at the rate 0f 10% per annum fmm me d te of applieaiioa. The ameunt has been (iepeeiteal by the Insurance Company before the Tribunal. The §3etiti0ner has raised an Objectien that the said amount of awayd has not been deposited by §the appeliant metereaee companv n 1 <1 amaartfa—vt‘say—n/zu 1 vwn‘). Cla- QS'RL Garmlig. fwa 33 Q31 ‘ mfg WW NbCp’j— W200 2’4 6" L/Og 3m1m (Wu) WWW ix gifém m wiihm 2 manms 311d, th€refcra rate of mtamst is payabk at. the 1‘at6 of 10% par amnym from tha dam of appiicatien. Lsaiimd Tribuna} recerckad a finding that m fact the; V amaunt of award hag been dapogitgd by fag Insuramce Compémy Within a 1361“ 0d of two months aft€r rgcsipt of 36; diigd copy of tho aw rd arid, thoroforo troaténg deposi’é. in timo, dismiosed the $1011 obje raised by the 33eti+‘oner. Shri Raja Sharm Iearned counsel for the petitio; er 11 a wome. submit that the vard passed by the Tribunal} did not say that the two month would be reckoned fi‘om the date of receipt of certified cop of the award by the insurance eompamy and, admittedy the amount has beexl deposited after a period of 2 manglths Le. on 8—2-2é05 amt, therefore, i iterest is payabie on the amount of award at the rate of 10% per anonm. Per eootra, Shit agrawaf sabmits that in View of the of Court judgment Supreme reported 3’11 the Case of Nationa: Ioeuraoce Company av- Keshav Bahadur reported in 2094*{2} SCC 370, the respoodem is going to prefer appeal against the award passed by the Tribuoai alld,‘ therefore, this matter may be kept iii abeyaiice. 1 i ,JV '{Iaafoiiaawxigs w“ a xwnoo. ‘1; :4 a. J a Uiipyl‘k fa' ia q{ ‘ WWW ‘ WWW wwm‘“ mwésrm %31fcme?té$1 VJKL Ea‘afiag haarc‘ 13h he 1 no kae; 1 ior c th€ parties arm having pcwiaei‘i €116 Award, it is clear that the ainoun‘i of award haS 1101‘ b€€n depositxed by the inshrance campany Wimm m3 Lma aEcwed by the Tzébunal L71 1m evaid and, tiEaraf-‘r‘JI‘a t7 a getitioner is animal for the, iii-Ems: a: +h€ raf of 1- 1 P \0 amli - L71 iermg 3f 1:316 aq; “gasrsgd 13y m6; Trihunal. Till new :10 113pe€£ has £6611 piiaewad 133; the raspomiénta‘ aim, "k.(D‘1 « \ c timrefora, 1.1 $116 absence Jx an} appeal, the reSpondent No. 3 ‘9‘}“9 Aggie Tm ye aepoSL ‘ * .~’f me ‘ am ‘untvin terms of the award. Theyefere, the petiti 11 is aEowed £12161 it is directed lat tile yeepomlent/msm‘anc company shall depogit the amount 1 of inte ‘est by calcuiafing the imerest at The r te of 1.0% per annum from the date of‘appEcation till the date when Ehe I i i $ company has deposited the amoum: of awad before the f i Tribunal Wixhin 3 months} H wever, Lhe respondent is free to I i E a'Jaii the remeay of appeal in accordance with 1aw agajnet the aware: pagsed by the Claime Tribunal. E / i Sdl- x \ N.K. AgraWal 2 Judge I l i i i E ”a“ 7:<n137~zls/9S<—H/zox> ~i1ra‘.u.nn;h