IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2008 IN STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO. 436 OF 2008 SMT. RUKMINI RAMDAS FAL DESSAI ... Applicant Versus SHRI. KRISHNA UTTAM FAL DESSAI AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Pravir R. Sangodkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 28th February, 2008 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel on behalf of the parties. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondents states that the file has been collected by his clients and seeks permission to be discharged. Permission granted. Mr. P. R. Sangodkar, learned Counsel on behalf of the Applicant states that copies of the present application were personally served by the Applicant upon Respondent No.2 and the legal heirs of Respondent No.1. None is present on their behalf. Mr. Sangdkar, learned Counsel states that the said Respondents have also give no objections on the copies served upon them. The statement is accepted. In view of the above, the application is granted. The delay is condoned. The legal heirs of Respondent No.1 shall, be brought on record. Cause title be corrected forthwith. Let First Appeal Nos.228 of 2000 come on Board next Thursday for the purpose of filing Consent Terms. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.