IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.769 of 2009 Date of decision: 12.2.2009 State of Punjab and others ......Petitioners Versus Ved Parkash ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: None. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. By way of this revision petition, the defendants have challenged order dated 23.10.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Kapurthala whereby application under Section 151 CPC for permission to file written statement has been dismissed. As per the averments made in the revision petition, the plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction that he is owner in possession of the property in dispute. On 4.6.2008. the defence of the defendant-petitioners was struck off because of non filing of written statement. It has been averred that on receiving instructions to defend the case, the Government pleader filed the present application to allow the defendants to place on record their written statement but the same has been rejected vide impugned order. I find no error of jurisdiction in the impugned order. The defence of the petitioners has already been struck off vide order dated 4.6.2008 which has not been challenged till date. In the face of the aforesaid order, the petitioners cannot be permitted to file the written statement, therefore, no fault can be found with the impugned order. Dismissed. February 12, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE