•^ .tS 'u 04 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT B1LASPUR W.P.NO. /^-1_/ 2006 Petitioner 3^...---", ^s^ ^•^<'-/' ^oV)06 •••-"" Versus Resuondents ' 2, ^ 't^^^ <o'^Ea* s ' Mahesh Kumar Verma S/o ....-•"^' Late Shri Kejuram Verma, ^t^Q- Aged about 35 years, R/o .....-•••"Village Bharuadih, Post - Champa, P.S. - Palari, Tehsil - Baloda Bazar, Dist : Raipur- (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Agriculture Department, DKS Bhawan Raipur, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Baloda Bazar, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) The Regional Manager, Agriculture Jal Vayu Kshetriya Project Chhattisgarh Ka Maidan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) The Director Agriculture Raipur (C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary Agriculture Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Dist : Bhopal-fM.P.j Union of India, Through the Chief Secretary Department of Personal & Training & Public Grievances, Shastri Marg, Ne-w Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OFLINDIA "T XI-HC-22 •g^ •»ii»Mtl,riTfly'lS, r«iinitiy 36 ^M^,4y2^:s.&6fc *11*1MI Shiliqi 'WE, 200 SII^T'qB R-li?(i 3)1^1 5htir°b ^Bficf 311^1 TRBWHftg 13.1-2006 Jaib Sfcte Petifioner byShri Deepak Shri Vivek Sharrua, for tfae ShriS.K. Beriwal, Sr. Paael: With consent, heard finally, This case rclates to compassji< death of aii eiaployee serviag ia the Learaed counsel for the of the eaiployee bas oceurred on] earlier. It is further submitted No. 1322/2002 involvmg the same Court on 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Leamed counsel for fhe states that the State of'ChIiattisgejrI] cases of depeudants of fhose em^lo. strictly in accordance with the In view of ffae subinissions parties, witliout expressing any opinion of this Court, ends ofjusti|c the State of Chhattisgarbt and th^ decide the case of fhe petitioner i4 the time ofdeath of the employee apponitmeut orders will be issued 2006. The petitioss-r is also autborities. Jt is inade-clear fhat inay avail fhe remedy avajjable before fhis Court. With the aforesaid observatiotis Conseqnently M.W.P. No. Ccrtified copy as per rules. Copy to the State couasel, ^ order to fhe respoadents for coxnpli^n L^wyi passjionate appointinent consequent upon the IState. peti(ioner categ&ricatly stated fhat, the death 4-8-1999 i.e, after 1-11-1997 and not jftiat ia bafch of cases bearing W.P. jiuestion orders bave been passed by ttois 1|hat simflar ordera inay be passed in ttiis Stsite under ctil^cTifh Tt?TRTf ^ f^t' <[^^R ^SlPgHSII^T , Advocate. rei foi Union of India. ittisgejrh em^loyees policjy prevalent Blade 0|>UU( does not dispute the above fact and has taken a decision to consider fhe who died oa or afber 1/11/1997 at fhattmie. by leamed counsel appearmg for the 3]g>uuon on fhe m.eri.ts of fhe case, ia fhe i]ce wifl be served ifa diTection is given to auttiorities conceraed to consider aad accordaace wifh fhe policy prevalent at cjincenied. If fhe petitioner foiuid eligible, early as possible on or before 30*h April, to reiider due co-operation to the grievadce s.tiB reinauis, the petitioner the law iucludiag filmg of tbe petitioa als dirtcted ifjaay 134/2006 , fhis petition staads disposed of. also stands disposed of. (vho wiU be obBged to ponuniuiicate the .^nce. --——'- — Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge [^^a^ Xo ^'