1 BA 963 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.963 OF 2011 Lala @ Irfan Sherali Khan .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. V.V. Purwant, i/b Mr. P. L. Sapkale, for the applicant. Mrs. A. A. Mane, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 10th October, 2011 P.C. 1. This is the second bail application by applicant, who was allowed to withdraw his earlier Application No.235 of 2011 after it was indicated that the application for bail would be rejected. The only change in circumstance which the learned counsel for the applicant points out, is the supplementary statement of Jitendra Ashok Jadhav, which was not brought to the notice of this Court when the earlier application was allowed to be withdrawn. That statement is dated 19th March, 2011. Learned counsel for the applicant also points out that the test identification parade was conducted, but the applicant was not identified. However, the witness had stated that his Motorola Company’s mobile phone given to him by his master Ramkrishna Jahdav, was seized from the applicant, was identified by this witness and he had produced the necessary 2 BA 963 OF 2011 documents about the ownership of the said mobile phone. Apart from this there are two witnesses Nisar Shaikh and Shamu Kalia, who have identified the applicant in T.I. Parade. In view of this, there is no reason to take a different view now. Application is rejected. However, the learned trial Judge would take up the case of the applicant for expeditious hearing and dispose of the same as far as possible, having due regard to the older cases of under trial prisoners who may be in jail since before the applicant was arrested. 2. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)