IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9306 of 2010 DHIRAJ SHARMA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 25.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. rather by the informant only to save the skin of his paramour, Manish Gupta, who talked her, and mobile number was found in her diary and he remained present while she was taken on a tempo. There is allegation of torture of providing some intoxicating substance resulting thereon she regain her conscious only at Rishikesh where his parents were easily informed leading her rescue but nothing was done by any of the so called kidnappers. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Aurangabad (M) P.S. Case No. 167 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)