IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1134 of 2008 ------ 1. AMOL KUMAR YADAV 2. KRITYANAND YADAV 3. RENU DEVI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. MUNNI DEVI ----------- 2. 9.5.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.683 of 2005 registered under section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the complainant has filed a complaint petition on account of some family dispute against her in-laws’ family. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled against petitioners no.2 and 3, who are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant respectively, are omnibus. Considering the submissions as noticed above and on perusal of the allegations made in the complaint, petitioner no.2, Krityanand Yadav and petitioner no.3 Renu Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with C.A. No.683 of 2005 within a period of four weeks from today, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., 2 Purnia, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In view of the allegations made in the complaint, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.1 Amol Kumar Yadav. His bail application is, accordingly, rejected. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)