IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12437 of 2004 Between: Bommideni Satyanarayana S/o Narsaiah Rebbena (V) , Rebbena Mandal, Adilabad District ..... PETITIONER AND The Land Acquisition Officer - Cum Sub Collector, Asifabad, Adilabad District .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:MRS.B.NEERAJA SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent : AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying aﬃdavit it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of mandamus directing the respondent to refer the matter pertaining to acquisition of Land in Survey. No. 23 Pulikunta Village, Rebbena Mandal, Adilabad District, to the competent Civil Court under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act. 1894 within two Months from today and consequently declare the inaction of the respondent in referring the matter to Civil Court as violative of duties under Section 18 of L. A. Act.” At the hearing Smt B.Neeraja Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that as the respondent referred the petitioner’s claim for enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after the filing of this writ petition, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.15805 of 2004 ﬁled by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 25th August, 2008 vrn