IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14666 of 2010(O&M) Decided on : 24-01-2011 Sunil Kumar and others ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. R.K.Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kohal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J The grievance of the petitioners in so far appointment to the post is concerned has been answered. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners should have been appointed from the date when the persons with lessor merit have been appointed. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioners may raise their grievance regarding appointment when their juniors have been appointed by making a representation. In case such a representation is made, the respondents shall decide the case of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and grant them the deemed date of appointment without any pecuniary benefits emanating from grant of such deemed date of appointment. Disposed of. January 24 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge