1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3501 OF 2006 Chandarani Bharat Dhavan & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Sidheshwar Maruti Karande & Ors. .. Respondents. Ms.A.R.S.Baxi for the petitioners. Mr.S.V.Dhakepalkar for respondent nos.2 and 8. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2006 DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2006 DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2006 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent nos.2 and 8. 2. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 10.3.2006 passed on application at Exhibit-5 in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.344/2005 by which the said application has been allowed. The relevant operative part of the order reads thus: "1. The application is hereby allowed. 2. The stay granted to the execution, operation of impugned order passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner Latur in Revision petition No.25/2004 during pendency and final disposal of the main petition". 3. The above order has been passed, pending hearing of the civil miscellaneous application no.344 2 2 2 of 2005. Keeping that in view and considering that the order impugned is operating since 10th March, 2006 I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends off justice: (a) The court below shall decide the civil miscellaneous application no.344 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law about which I express no opinion. (b) The interim order dated 10.3.2006 shall remain operative till disposal of the aforesaid application. . With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)