IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30955 of 2008 1. SANJEEV SINGH. 2. VIJAY MAHTO. 3. DHARMENDRA MAHTO. 4. RATI LAL MAHTO. 5. MADAN MISHRA. 6. MOHAN MISHRA. 7. UDAI KANT JHA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 323, 342, 504 of I.P.C. and 3(1)(X) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is submitted that the allegations under the Indian Pena Code are bailable. The latter Act has been invoked only to ensure denial of anticipatory bail. On 17.1.2007 petitioner No.1 along with others was on his lands with Government functionaries for demarcation as while he was away from the village the lands were being encroached when an unruly mob intervened and attempted to disrupt the measurement. Petitioner No.1 lodged an F.I.R. on the same day. The present complaint has been lodged the next day on 18.1.2007 in retaliation. The dispute essentially was, therefore, with regard to lands only. Having considered the facts and circumstances - 2 - of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( ten thousand ) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in CR No.69 of 2007, TR No.2910 of 2007. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )