IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No.15570 of 2008. Date of decision: 17.3.2011 Shally Kaistha & ors. …. Petitioners Versus State of H.P & anr. ...... Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting ? No For the petitioner: Mr.Adarsh Vashista, Advocate vice Mr.R.S.Kanwar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Vivek Singh Thakur, Addl. Advocate General with Mr.Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J. (oral) The main relief claimed in the petition is that the respondent-State had wrongly raised the minimum educational qualification from Graduation to Post Graduation. It is not disputed that in fact, no selection was made pursuant to the impugned advertisement and fresh advertisement was issued later on. Since no selection had been made pursuant to the impugned advertisement, 2 the petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. March 17, 2011 (m) ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge