IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 253 of 2008 Bhushan Lal. ……… Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. ……… Respondents Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for the applicant / petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent No. 1 submit very fairy and frankly that the complaint in question be quashed because it does not disclose the commission of an offence. Even I have seen the complaint and do find that it does not disclose the commission of any offence. The petition is allowed. The complaint in question, along with all the proceedings relating thereto and the orders passed therein, is hereby quashed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 23.04.2008 G