1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1658/2005 (Smt. Madhu Parmar Vs. Marwar Gramin Bank & Ors.) Date of Order :: 22.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Rajesh Shah, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S. Purohit, for the respondents. In this case, the petitioner is claiming appointment on compassionate ground due to death of her husband late Shri Ramesh B. Parmar, who was working with the Bank. After the death of petitioner's husband, an application was filed by the petitioner for providing appointment on compassionate ground. The application filed by the petitioner has been rejected vide Annexure-3 dated 28th June, 2004 without assigning any reason and it has been observed that as per judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court and on the basis of Notification issued by the Sponsored Bank and Nabard, the application of the petitioner for providing appointment on compassionate ground is rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited attention of this Court towards the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2000 (6) SCC 493 (Balbir Kaur & Anr. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Ors.), in which, the matter with regard to appointment on similar ground was remitted to the authorities concerned for re-consideration. In this case also upon perusal of Annexure-3, it is clear that no reasons are assigned for rejection of petitioner's 2 application for providing appointment on compassionate ground, therefore, while quashing Annexure-3 dated 28th June, 2004, the case is remitted to the respondent Bank for reconsidering the application of the petitioner for providing appointment on compassionate ground and at the time of consideration, respondents shall consider the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Balbir Kaur (supra) and pass fresh order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-