IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12339 of 2008. Decided on: 4th January, 2011. Rajeev Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4. Respondent No. 5, already exparte. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment respondent No. 6 to the post of Junior Engineer in Panchayat Samiti, Gagret, District Una. 2. Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that he has obtained degree in Civil Engineering from Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala (Punjab). According to him, the respondent No. 6 has only obtained diploma in Civil Engineering. However, fact of the matter is that the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 6 has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee. Respondent No. 6 has been found more suitable vis-à-vis petitioner. Consequently, this 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by a duly constituted Selection Committee. 3. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge January 04, 2011. (bhupender)