( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3953 OF 2007 Jayashri Urban Co-operative Society APPLICANT VERSUS Shri Chandrashekhar Haribhau Choudhari and another. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent No.1, though served. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 6th August, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Though served, the respondent No. 1 has not appeared. 2. Mr. Kulkarni points out that in identical matter, leave to appeal is granted by this Court and, therefore, Criminal Appeal No. 52/2009 is registered. In the present case too, the question involved is as to whether the cheques were issued by the respondent No. 1 towards security in respect of his employment as a ( 2 ) Manager. There is no dispute about the fact that he issued the cheques in question. His wife and other two (2) relatives had taken the loan. The case of the complainant is that the respondent No. 1 issued the cheques so as to discharge the financial liability to which he was the guarantor for his wife and the relatives. Considering the peculiar fact situation, this is a fit case in which leave to appeal is required to be granted. The application is, therefore, allowed. Leave to appeal is granted. 3. Admit the appeal. 4. Notice of appeal to be issued afresh. All the three connected appeals to be heard together. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/CRIAPLN3953-07