IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2010 MR. PETER DA SILVA ... Petitioner Versus MR. OVID DA SILVA THROUGH HIS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY AND 3 ORS. ... Respondent Mrs. A. A. Agni, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 24th November, 2010 P.C. Heard Mrs. Agni, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 22nd September, 2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa in Special Civil Suit No.109/2007/C disposing of the application filed by plaintiff no.2 to transpose plaintiff no.1 as co-defendant. 3. Mrs. Agni, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the learned trial Judge could not have given the directions sought to be given by the learned trial Judge in the operative part of the order. 4. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record, I do not find any jurisdictional error having been committed by the learned trial Judge while passing the impugned order. I fail to understand as to how the learned trial Judge could have permitted two plaintiffs to be represented by two Advocates. The issue in the matter is squarely covered by the judgments of this Court in the case of Laxmidas N. Madhvani V. Madhvani Private Ltd.; 1986 vol.88 BLR 308 and BBN (UK) Ltd.and others Vs. Janardan Mohandas Rajan Pillai and others; 1993(3) Bom.C.R. 228, in which this Court has held that two or more plaintiffs cannot be represented by different advocates in the same proceeding. 5. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA