IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 3578 of 2007(O&M) Amar Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Uttar Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd. & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The prayer in the present writ petition is for counting the work charge service for grant of pension. It is not disputed before me that the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam & others Versus Bachan Singh (Civil Appeal No.4903 of 2009), decided on 30.7.2009. With the concurrence of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing. Since the dispute is squarely covered by the decision referred to above, the present writ petition is, accordingly, allowed in terms of Bachan Singh's case (supra). The consequent direction to count the work charge service for the grant of pensionary benefits are, accordingly, issued. March 18, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE