Civil Revision No. 3031 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 3031 of 2010 Date of Decision: 9.7.2010 Vipan Sharma …Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The tenant has filed a suit for permanent injunction against the landlord that he be not dispossessed forcibly except in due course of law. In the plaint, he has specifically averred that the monthly rent paid to the landlord was Rs.2,000/- and the landlord was compelling him to enhance the same to Rs.5,000/-. The landlord appeared and filed a reply that initially the monthly rent was Rs.2,000/- which was subsequently enhanced to Rs.4,000/-. At that stage, an application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC has been filed stating therein that due to typographical error, Rs.200/- has been typed as Rs.2,000/- and the rent which was enhanced and being paid was Rs.800/-. The trial Court has rightly held the application for amendment of the plaint to be malafide. Civil Revision No. 3031 of 2010 2 Hence, no interference is warranted in the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed in limine. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge July 9, 2010 “DK”