1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2222 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.220 OF 2010 (Shrirang Dhondiba Ghule vs. State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.S.Ghanekar, Adv., for the applicant/appellant. Mr.S.D.Kaldate, APP, for respondent. ... CORAM: SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE:25-6-2010 P.C.:- 1. I have admitted Criminal Appeal No.220/2010 today only by separately passing order therein. 2. Issue notice. Mr.Kaldate, learned A.P.P., accepts the notice for respondent. 3. Heard Mr. N.S.Ghanekar, Counsel for the aplicant/appellant (Original accused ) and Mr. S.D.Kaldate, learned Counsel for the respondent. 2 4. This is an application preferred by the applicant/appellant for his enlargement on bail pending hearing and final disposal of the appeal, suspending the substantive sentences awarded to him. 5. It is the contention of the applicant that he was on bail during the pendency of the trial and he has not misused the said liberty. The applicant also contends that the fine awarded to him by way of judgment and order dt.3.6.2010 has been deposited by him before the trial Court. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was enlarged on bail by the trial Court after conviction under Section 389 of Code of Criminal Procedure by suspending the substantive sentences till the appeal period and requested that the same bail be continued during the pendency of the appeal (No. 220/2010). 6. Considering the position that 3 the applicant/appellant was on bail during the pendency of the trial and, apparently, as contended by learned Counsel for the applicant, he has not misused the said liberty and also considering the position that the applicant has deposited the fine before the trial Court and further considering the position that the applicant has been granted bail by the trial Court, after conviction, suspending the substantive sentences till the appeal period, as contended by the learned Counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions but on execution of the fresh bond by him, suspending the substantive sentences, till the final hearing and disposal of the present appeal (No.220/2010) and the present application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P.DAVARE) JUDGE ... agp/2222-10crapl