IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1187 of 2006 LAKHANDEO PRASAD & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. S. Parasmani, Advocate For opposite party Nos. : Junior Counsel to Additional 1,2,3, 5 and 6 Advocate General-III For opposite party No.4 : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ---------------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --------- Dated, the 4th September, 2008. Since letters patent appeal was dismissed in default at threshold, we are satisfied that notice to opposite party Nos. 7 to 26 is not necessary. Opposite party Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 are represented by the government counsel. Opposite party no.4 is represented by Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that the Advocate for the appellants was prevented by sufficient cause in appearing before the Court when the case was called out. 3. We, accordingly, grant this application and - 2 - restore L.P.A. No. 985 of 2005 to its original file. 4. M.J.C. stands disposed of. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Pawan/-