IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2008 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1201 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.30450/2007 Dated 04/03/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- -------------------------------------- K.P. VARGHESE, S/O PAULOSE, AGED 51 YEARS, KUNNATH KALAPPURAYIL VADAYAMPADY KARA, PUTHENCRUZ REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, K.P. PAULOSE, S/O PATHROSE, AGED 79 YEARS, KUNNATH KALAPPURAYIL VADAYAMPADY KARA, PUTHENCRUZ. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION --------------- P.P. ABUBACKER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O PAREED, SECRETARY PUTHRIKA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOLENCHERRY. ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt of Court Case No.1201/2008 IN W.P.(c).No.30450 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of October , 2008 JUDGMENT The photographs which were shown to me yesterday have now been produced by the respondent. They are marked for convenience as Annexures R1(d), R1(e) and R1(f). Having gone through Annexures R1(d), R1(e) and R1(f), I feel that the directions in my judgment have been substantially complied with by the respondent Panchayat. Sri.Paul.K.Varghese submits that the grievances still subsist and that the directions have not been finally complied with. I do not think that a case is made out for initiation of action for contempt against the respondent. If the petitioner continues to have grievances, this judgment closing the contempt of court case will not stand in the way of the petitioner approaching a competent civil court. Contempt of Court Case is closed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.