IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12114 of 2005 Between: 1 K.Kishore, s/o. Seshaiah @ Seshagiri, R/o. Venkateswara Nagar, Kandukur, Parkasam District. 2 K.Rambabu, S/o. Seshaiah @ Seshagiri, R/o. Nallakunta, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Superintedent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kandukur, Prakasam District. 3 Station House Officer, Kandukur Town PS Kandukur, Prakasam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheets No. 589 &590 on the rolls of 3rd respondent police station against the petitioners is illegal, irregular, without jurisdiction and violative of AP Police Standing Orders and also offends Art: 14,19&21 of the Constitution of India , set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's personal liberty and life and pass such other orders or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 12114 of 2005 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheets No.589 and 590 on the rolls of the third respondent-Police Station is arbitrary and illegal. Though no counter affidavit is filed, the learned Government Pleader for Home, under instructions, stated that the rowdy sheets opened against the petitioners were closed on 27-06-2005. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-01-2009 KLP