IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.97 of 2009 BAIJNATH MAHTO, son of Ram Ashre Mahto, resident of village- Inayee, P.S. Revelganj, District- Saran, At present- resident of Mohalla- Diwakar Lane, Punjabi Gali, Mauna, P.S. Chapra Town, District- Saran …Complainant/ Petitioner Versus 1. PRAMOD SINGH, son of Birendra Singh, 2. Sachchita Singh, son of Ramraj Singh, 3. Shanker Singh, son of Harendra Singh, All resident of village- Inayee, P.S. Revelganj, District- Saran & …Accused/ Opposite Party 1st set 4. The State of Bihar … Opposite party/Opposite Party 2nd set ----------- 3/ 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the judgment impugned by which the opposite party nos. 1 to 3 have been acquitted of the charges under sections 323, 341, 348 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code. On going through the judgment and considering the reasons for acquittal of the opposite party nos. 1 to 3, I see no reason to take a different view. The application is dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)