IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31981 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners namely Arun Kumar Singh and Manish Singh alias Manikant Manish who apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.2218(c)/2009 for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 417 of I.P.C. Also heard learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for complainant. It would appear from the contents of complaint petition that complainant had taken loan from the company of the petitioners for purchasing the vehicle. Subsequently, in default of making payment of the aforesaid loan, the aforesaid vehicle was seized by the petitioners-company and after settlement, the aforesaid vehicle was returned to the complainant but it is alleged that some parts of the aforesaid vehicle were found damaged. In my view, in the facts and circumstances 2 petitioners, are entitled to get the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that above stated petitioners in the event of their arrest / surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.2218(c)/2009, shall be released on bail furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran subject to condition as well as under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C pn ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)