IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2008 / 28TH SRAVANA 1930 CMA.No. 191 of 2001 ----------------------------- A.S. NO. 156/1995 DTD. 09/08/2000 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM, O.S. NO. 401/1991 OF MUNSIFF - MAGISTRATE'S COURT, PARAVOOR. .................... APPELLANT/ APPELLANT/ PLAINTIFF: ------------------------------------------------------ SANKARAN KRISHNAN, NOW RESIDING AT 1/C NO. 3525386 BERADIN ESTATE, PALOH JOHARE WEST MALAYSIS FROM THANDANAZHIKATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM CHERRY, PARAVOOR VILLAGE. VELAYUDHAN VELUKKUTTY, PERILLATHAZHIKAM, KOTTAPPURAM FROM THEKKE VEEDU KATTUKULAM, KOTTAPPURAM, (POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER). BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR. RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KUTTY CHELLAMMA, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. 2. RAMAN ASHOKAN, KATTULULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. 3. THULASEEDHARAN, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. 4. SUSEELA, KATTULULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. 5. RAJAN, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. C.M.A. NO. 191/2001: 6. MURALI, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. *7. PUSHPAVALLI, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. *8. SULOCHANA, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. *9. RAVEENDRAN, KATTUKULATHU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVOOR. *10. VELAYUDHAN GOPALAN, THANDANAZHIKOM KIZHAKKE VEEDU, DO. CHERRY. *RESPONDENTS 7 TO 10 ARE DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DATED 19/08/2008 IN I.A. NO. 3067/2005. ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE FOR R1 TO 3, 5 & 6. THIS CIVIL MISC. APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.M.A.NO. 191 OF 2001 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T It has been brought to my notice that the suit has been dismissed for default on 4th December, 2000. We are in the year 2008. So, after the order of remand since the plaintiff has remained absent the suit has been disposed of by the Court below. Therefore nothing remains in this CMA and therefore it is dismissed. If at any point of time prior to this judgment the suit has been restored to file I give an opportunity to the appellant herein to move an application for reviewing the judgment. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/- M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = C.M.A. No. 191 OF 2001 = = = = = = = = = = = J U D G M E N T 19th August, 2008.