.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.816 OF 2006 M/s.Property Guards Security Services Pvt. Ltd., ...Petitioner. Versus The Union of India and 6 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Vaibhav Krishna i/b. Juris Consillis, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.R.A.Rodrigues with Mr.A.M.Sethna with Mr.R.L.Master & Ms.Ritu Singh, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr.R.S.Pai i/b. Haresh Mehta & Co. for Respondent No.3. Mr.P.M.Mokashi, A.G.P., for Respondent No.2. Mr.Birendra Saraf with Mr.Kunal Damle i/b. Udwadia & Udeshi, for Respondent No.7. Ms.Lata Desai i/b. Pallavi Divekar, Advocate for Resepondent No.5. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JULY 27, 2006. JULY 27, 2006. JULY 27, 2006. P.C.: 1. The Contract in this Petition was terminated in February, 2006. Reply has been filed on behalf of Respondent Bank pointing out that, that was done in terms of the term of the contract and pursuant to their notice dated 10.2.2006. There is no subsisting contract between the parties. If the parties are still aggrieved, it will be open to them to file Suit for damages. With the above observations, Petition is dismissed. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]