IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32533 of 2010 VIVEKANAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02/ 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It would appear from perusal of the contents of the complaint petition that marriage of the complainant was solemnized in the year 1996 with the petitioner and for some time, she led her conjugal life with the petitioner. Subsequently, the complainant’s mother-in-law demanded Rs 5 lakhs from the complainant and thereafter dispute arose between the parties. It appears from the petition that the petitioner dropped the complainant at her uncle house where the complainant became pregnant. Subsequently, the complainant gave birth to a child but the relation between the complainant and the petitioner could not be restored. Thereafter the petitioner filed a suit for divorce in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court. After getting summons from the family court, the complainant filed the instant complaint case. Admittedly, there is no specific allegation of any overt-act against the petitioner and she simply stated that the petitioner is a drunkard. Although the petitioner is husband of the complainant but considering peculiarity of the case, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and accordingly, it is ordered that the petitioner(Vivekanand Singh) in the event of arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no.3001 of 2 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJ.M., Purnia subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))