CWP No.15875 of 2004 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15875 of 2004 Date of decision : 18-08-2010 Vikas Chaudhary .... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. J.K. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Raj, AAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 and 3. Mr. Summet Sheokand, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, for respondent No.4 and 5. Mr. Balram Gupra, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Anamika Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.7. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Petitioner has prayed in the present writ petition that Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak be directed to accept fee from the petitioner and grant him admission in Government Dental College, Rohtak. This Court need not to go into the detailed facts enumerated in the writ petition as the time is the great healer, and has redressed the grievance of the petitioner. And the respondents to the writ petition have also no objection to the continuation of the petitioner in BRS Institute of Medical Science & Technology, Kot Billa, Distt. Panchkula. This is so because the present writ petition was filed in the year 2004. CWP No.15875 of 2004 -2- The grievance of the petitioner is that instead of BRS Institute of Medical Science & Technology Kot Billa, Distt. Panchkula, he was entitled to get admission in PGIMS, Rohtak. Howver, he had continued to study in BRS Institute of Medical Science & Technology, Kot Billa, Distt. Panchkula for the last more than five years. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5 has taken a stand that they had never any objection to the continuation of the petitioner in their college. Mr. Balram Gupta, Senior Advocate appearing for respondent No.7 – University has stated that since college has made the admission and petitioner has appeared in the examination of the University, admission is to be taken as regular and there is no objection to the continuation of the petitioner as a student of the University. Counsel for the State has also not disputed the admission of the petitioner in BRS Institute of Medical Science & Technology, Kot Billa, Distt. Panchkula – respondent No.4. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties, petitioner may continue in the respondent – College as regular student and complete his studies. Respondent – University will declare the result of the examinations undertaken by the petitioner. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) 18-08-2010 JUDGE manju