IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 1692 of 1991 Date of decision: April 25, 2011 Sube Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Parshad, DAG, Haryana. A.N. Jindal, J Having perused the pleadings and the written statement filed by L.D. Narwal, IPS, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ambala Range, Ambala Cantt., it transpires that only those Sub-Inspectors are entitled to be promoted to the post of Inspector who are brought on the “F” list of the Director General of Police on the recommendations of the Deputy Inspector General of Police. Firstly, the recommendation is made by the Superintendent of Police then by the Deputy Inspector General of Police in order to forward the name of deserving sub-inspectors, which is further scrutinized by the Deputy Inspector General of Police and on the basis of the service record, the names of the sub-inspectors are recommended under P.P.R. 13.15 Vol. II sub-clause 2. The Officers so recommended are considered by the Director General of Police and then keeping in view the service record, the name of the recommendee officer is brought on “F” list. Since the petitioner did not have good record of service inasmuch as he had not earned more than 70% good reports, which is one of the criteria for promotion, as such, he could not be promoted. Since the petitioner did not fulfill all the conditions for promotion, therefore, he was declined promotion. Resultantly, finding no merit in the petition the same is dismissed. April 25, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge