IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Review No. 156 of 2011 Date of decision: 6.12.2011 1. Smt. Guddi Devi wife of Late Sh. Satya Dev, R/O Village Bajret Koti, P.O. Jagothi Nala, Tehsil Rohru, District Shimla, presently R/O Sharma Niwas, Kasumpti, Shimla-09. 2. Shri Kanwar Singh, S/o Shri Satya Dev, R/O Village Bajret Koti, P.O. Jagothi Nala, Tehsil Rohru, District Shimla, H.P. 3. Shri Dhani Ram, S/O Sh. Sewa Nand, R/O Village Bajret Koti, P.O. Jagothi Nala, Tehsil Rohru, District Shimla, presently R/O Sharma Niwas, Kasumpti, Shimla-09. ….Petitioners. Versus 1. Shri Jawahar Lal, S/O Sh. Ishwar Singh, R/O Village Khoon, P.O. Kui, Tehsil Rohru, Distt. Shimla, H.P. 2. Harinder Alias Pinku, S/O Shri Joginder Singh, R/O Hospital Road, Vikas Nagar, District Dehradoon, Uttranchal at present resident of Phati Ram Building, Tehsil Rohru, Distt. Shimla through respondent No.1. 3. United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through its Divisional Manager, Division Officer, Timber House, Shimla-02. ….Respondents. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. for reviewing the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge in FAO No. 62/2009 on 7.9.2011 titled Smt. Guddi Devi & other V/S Sh. Jawahar Lal & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. . For the petitioners: Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. D.S. Nainta, Advocate. 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that this Court has not properly appreciated the evidence with regard to dispatch and delivery of the letter allegedly sent by the Insurance Company to the owner and the Regional Transport Officer. 3. In the judgment this Court has discussed the statements of the witnesses in detail and has come to a finding of fact that the Insurance Company has proved that it had sent the letter informing the owner about the dishonour of the cheque and cancellation of the policy vide letter Ext. RW-1/C and that a similar letter was sent through ordinary post to the Regional Transport Officer. This is based on appreciation of the evidence by this Court and no error on the face of the record is shown to have occurred. Therefore, there is no merit in the review petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Deepak Gupta) Judge December 6, 2011 (vt)