IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2011 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2072 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO. 770/2011 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ ACCUSED:- ------------------------------ SUDHIR KUMAR C.S, 2ND FLOOR, 66,POCKET -1, SECTOR 25,PHASE-3,ROHINI, NEW DELHI-110085. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.P.G.SURESH SMT.K.VIDYA SRI.RAJAN VISHNURAJ RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT:- ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM CENTRAL POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM ADV. SRI. M.S. BREEZE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ====================== B.A. No. 2072 of 2011 ====================== Dated this the 28th day of March, 2011. ORDER In this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail on the allegation that the Ernakulam Central Police are at his heels in connection with Crime No. 770 of 2011 registered for offences punishable under Section 66 A of the Information Technology Act and Section 118 (d) of the Kerala Police Act, 2010. The offence punishable under Section 66 A of the IT Act is bailable by virtue of Section 77 of the said Act and the offence punishable under Section 118(d) of the Kerala Police Act, 2010 is bailable in view of Section 125(1) of the said Act. Since both the aforesaid offences are bailable offences, invocation of Section 438 Cr.P.C is misconceived. This petition is accordingly dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek regular bail from the court concerned. sd/- V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE rv //True Copy// P.A to Judge.