IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2008 / 28TH ASWINA 1930 W.A.No.1732 of 2008 ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.10369/2008-H, DATED 08/04/2008 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER:- --------------------------------------- JAYAKRISHNAN.R.S., PANDARATHOTTAM, NEDUMGOLAM P.O., PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.V.M.SALAHUDIN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- --------------------------------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY BUILDING, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J. ------------------------------------------- W.A.No.1732 of 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 20th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. This writ appeal is directed against the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.10369 of 2008 dated 8th April, 2008. By the impugned order, the learned Judge has rejected the writ petition. (2) The one and the only question that was canvassed by the petitioner before the learned Single Judge was that in revaluation of his English II Paper for B.Sc. Degree Examination, no mark has been awarded by the evaluators for question No.5. (3) The learned Single Judge, after going through the answer sheets that was produced by the learned counsel for the University, has come to the conclusion that the evaluator of English II Paper for B.Sc. Degree Examination had in fact granted three marks to question No.5 by the evaluator and accordingly has rejected the writ petition. (4) Having seen the orders passed by the learned Single Judge and having perused the materials available on record, we are of the firm opinion that the learned Single Judge has not committed any error whatsoever which would call for our interference in appeal. W.A.No.1732 of 2008 2 (5) Therefore, the writ appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (A.K.BASHEER) JUDGE vns/dk