IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27895 of 2008 RAM BALAK YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.08.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named accused, however, during investigation he has been implicated on the basis of the statement of some of the witnesses to the effect that this petitioner was also seen along with the co-accused after commission of the crime. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that in view of the statements of the witnesses implicating this petitioner, he does not deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. Considering the above, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to this petitioner. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)