IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8045 of 2010 OM PRAKASH RAM S/O LATE BISHWANATH RAM P-1, SULTANPURI, NEW DELHI, PERMANENT AND PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF VILL -DOHAR, P.S. DOHAR, P.S.RASULPUR, DISTT-CHAPRA, SARAN Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME MINISTRY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE , SPECIAL SECTOR OLD SECRETARIAT, DELHI-54 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL , CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE RAYPUR, CHHATTISGARH 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMANDENT OFFICER, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE RAYPUR, CHHATISGARH For the Petitioner : M/s Kapildeo Singh, Maheshwar Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Raghib Ahsan, Advocate. ----------- 02. 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India. 2. Petitioner at the relevant time served on the post of Constable(GD) in the CRPF. He is aggrieved by the order dated 7.3.2007 passed by the D.I.G., CRPF, Annexure-2, whereunder he has been removed from service on the ground that he had obtained employment as Constable(GD) in the force on the basis of the forged caste certificate. Against the order dated 7.3.2007 petitioner preferred appeal, which was dismissed by the I.G., CRPF under orders dated 18.3.2008, Annexure-5. Against the order dated 18.3.2008 petitioner has remedy of revision before the revisional authority in terms of Rule-29 of the CRPF Rules, 1955. 3. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India, I direct the petitioner to assail the order dated 18.3.2008 by filing revision before the DG, CRPF along with a certified copy of this order, who should not only condone the delay in filing the revision application but also consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within three months from the date of receipt of the revision application before the DG, CRPF. 4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)