IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34816 of 2011 Md. Akhtar, Son of Rafique Dewan, Resident of Village – Bishunpurwa- Chargharwa, Police Station – Ram Nagar, District – West Champaran. ………. Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar …………………. Opposite party ---------------------------------- 2 25.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant who was intending to file ‘vakalatnama’ in court. Learned counsel for the informant (complainant) is permitted to file ‘vakalatnama’ in the office. It was vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the complainant even before learned counsel for the petitioner had started argument that the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail. The petitioner is in custody in Complaint Case No. 903(C) of 2010 (Tr. No. 2694 of 2011), for offence under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2011. In view of nature of allegation as well as period of custody, let the petitioner namely Md. Akhtar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bagaha (West Champaran) in connection with Complaint Case No. 903(C) of 2010 (Tr. No. 2694 of 2011). Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)