BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11747 of 2011 O.RAJENDRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTIRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl.Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, no case has been registered against the petitioner, only petition enquiry is pending. 4. Considering the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, I am inclined to give a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of petition enquiry. The respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. 5. With the above direction, this Criminal Original petition is disposed of. sd/- 07/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S.VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.30301 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11747 of 2011 Date :07/09/2011 PA/08.09.2011/1P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/