IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32785 of 2008 Shankar Mahto, Son of Late Nanhku Mahto, Resident of Village Bhisa, PS Dumra, District Sitamarhi, at present posted as Nazir, Parihar Block in the district of Sitamarhi ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Collector, Sitamarhi. 2. The Sub-divisional Officer, Pupari, District Sitamarhi. 3. The Block Development Officer, Choraut, District Sitamarhi. --- Opposite Party ----------- 2 1.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed challenging the order of cognizance dated 24.9.2007 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupari on the ground that the I.O. has submitted final form stating that petitioner is not guilty of the offence. The Sub-divisional Police Officer, Pupari, Sitamarhi and the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi have also found the case false against the petitioner. However, differing with the final form, the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupari has taken cognizance. I see no illegality in the order impugned dated 24.9.2007, passed in Pupari P.S. Case No. 155 of 2005. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)