IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12580 of 2006 KANTI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE KRISHAN KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DANDIPATTI, P.O. + P.S.- UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. ……… PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR, CANAL REVENUE ADMINISTRATION, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CANAL REVENUE, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, TARAPUR, MUNGER. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. …….. RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 20.04.2011 Heard Sri Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Murari Prasad, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate No. 6, who appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 5/Accountant General, Bihar. The petitioner has made a prayer to quash ‘Annexure-12’ to the writ petition, whereby, pension of the petitioner has been fixed in the scale of Rs. 1640-2900/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pension has not been fixed in accordance with the provisions of the ‘Pension Rules’, and as such, same is required to be quashed. Learned counsel for the State has relied on an order 2 passed by this court on 29.11.2005 in C.W.J.C. No. 15334 of 2004. It was submitted that this court by its order dated 29.11.2005 had directed the authority concerned to fix the pension of the petitioner in the pay scale of Rs. 1640-2900/-. It was further submitted that in view of direction of this court, the respondent authority had no option but to comply the same, and in compliance with the order dated 29.11.2005 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15334 of 2004, the impugned order has been passed. After hearing the parties and considering the materials available on record, the court is of the opinion, that since the impugned order has been issued in compliance with the order passed by this court in a writ petition filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned has committed no error, and as such, in absence of any error in the impugned order no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The writ petition stands dismissed. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)