IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2010 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1932 OP.No. 10428 of 2003(N) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. BHAVANI KAIMAL, W/O. LATE P.VIJAYARAGHAVA KAIMAL, PADMA VILASAM, CHETHIMATTAM, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT MATHOOR, POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. V.CHANDRASEKHARA PANICKER, S/O. LATE P.VIJAYARAGHAVA KAIMAL, PADMA VILASAM, CHETHIMATTAM, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT MATHOOR, POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. VIJAYARAGHAVA PADMANABHA K.PANICKER, S/O. LATE P.VIJAYARAGHAVA KAIMAL, PADMA VILASAM, CHETHIMATTAM, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT MATHOOR, POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.SAJAN PHILIP MATHEW SMT.SREELEKHA PUTHALATH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE N.S.S. KARAYOGAM REG.NO.753, OFFICE OF THE N.S.S. KARAYOGAM, NEAR PUTHIYAKAV TEMPLE, CHETHIMATTOM, PALAI MUNICIPALITY, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DIST. 2. P.SURESH, S/O. V.S.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, SECRETARY, N.S.S. KARAYOGAM REG.NO.753, OFFICE OF THE N.S.S. KARAYOGAM, NEAR PUTHIYAKAV TEMPLE, CHETHIMATTOM, PALAI MUNICIPALITY, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.C.HARIDAS FOR R1 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- O.P.NO.10428 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to canvass the contentions raised before the court below in the pending suit. Objection is raised by the learned counsel for the respondents in acceding such permission for withdrawal. Since the original petition is being withdrawn on permission granted, I find the petitioners should be given opportunity to canvass whatever contentions available to them, as provided by law, before the appropriate forum. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- O.P.NO.10428 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- J U D G M E N T 23rd day of March, 2010