wp-3545-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3545 OF 2010 Sadhna @ Jyoti Deepak Shukla ...Petitioner Versus A.P.I.Shri V.H. Sadgawkar & ors ...Respondents ...... Shri Mukesh J. Pabari, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri H. J. Dedhia, A.P.P. for State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- 3rd February, 2011. P.C. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that investigation has not been done properly. In that photographs and medical certificates obtained by the Investigating Officer, during the course of investigation, do not form found part of the charge-sheet. This submission is countered by the learned A.P.P. on instructions of the I.O. who is present in the Court. Learned A.P.P submits that the photographs and documents are also part of the charge-sheet filed as separate compilation. Counsel for the petitioner submits that if it is already on record, the only question that may have to be considered is of recording statements of the additional wp-3545-10 witnesses mentioned by the petitioner to the I.O. which has not been done sofar. I.O. who is present in the Court, submits that if the petitioner furnishes list of the additional witnesses, he would record their statements and file the same along with supplementary report before the concerned court under section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This assurance is accepted. The petitioner may furnish list of the additional witnesses to the I.O. within one week from today. 2. In view of the above, counsel for the Petitioner, in all fairness, submits that reliefs claimed in the petition will not survive for consideration for the present. Accordingly, petition is disposed of on the above basis with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned court for further or appropriate relief, if any. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)