@D @ $5ngle Bench IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. WP. (S) No....M..§.3K?.......2011 PETITIONER................... iarithvi Raj Sahu, S/o Shri Purnchandra Sahu, Aged 54 Years, U.D.T., Middle School, Kayat Pali, Basna District Mahasamund C.G. VERSUS r“ RESPONDENTS (1) The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Offlcer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund ( C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUSLDIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. T \’D HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA w.P.gS) No. 4530/201 1 PETITIONER Pn'thvi Raj Sahn 31am of CG 8r, Others WRIT PETITLON UNDER ARTICLE 226/927 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF H‘IDIA Appearance: Shri Somkant Verma, counsel tbr the patitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the Stats] respondents. ORAL ORDER (11.08.2011) The petitioner was initially appointed, as Taachor on a iixcd pay of Rs. 100. After completion of probation period, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Counsel for the petitioner submits that me issued involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale With eEect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved herein was consideied by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. NO. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State of M.P. 8r. Others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with effect fmm the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Couit. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the eiTect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Couxt, while considering the same issue in Amar Sui Ram as Others Vs. I State of Chhatusgarh 8:. Others, W.P.{S) No. 4725/2006, by order dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioncxs to make a rcpreseniation within a period of ten. days, raiSing all the grievances. Accordingly, the petitioncr is granted libcny to make a repressntation raising all the grievancee in light of fhe aforestated judgment and order dated 5.1.2011 (Anncxure P/5) and in turn: the concerned respondent is directed to decide the repmsentaiion, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three. months fmm the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts; In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. § ;,..;—Qa ”e . Sd/- Mamndra Mohan Shrivastava Judge