PETmONER': Smt Sunita Shvivastava, Wife o’f Shri Naimul Haque. Aged about 50 yeazs. Working as ‘ $upervisor (PARYAVEKSHAK) Woman' and ChHd Development Department, Chiid Development Project Office, Udaipur, Dist: Surguja (CG) -Ver1;us- RESPONDENTS: - 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Woman and Child Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Directar, Woman and Chile Devetopment Department, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) The Collector, surguja, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (CG) The District Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development, Ambikapur. Distt; Surguja (CG) A! J!A singie Bench: Hon’iaae smi Dhirendra Mishra, J. 31 -1 r2009:- Shri V.K. Pandey, counselfi 5hr: MP3. Bhatia, beputyi Heard. // 7, ‘ y This petition is directed ' a9 1r the petitioner. ;ovt. Advocate for the Stateirespondents. ainst the transfer order dated 4—7-2008 of Annexure-Pl‘l whereby the petit:ler, who is posted as Supervisor, Woman and Child Development Depart transferred to Pratappur, District $1 nt at Udaipur, District Surguja has been rrguja on administrative groun/V/x/z/ 7// //_ / d WW,WW muuu..‘nuuuuu"nun...”nnw’ ‘ 111200 mm (Wu) ’wmm mmm 902,, WW WW éxat'fmm - /.~\ Learned counsei for the peti er submits that husband of the petitioner is a!so posted at Udaipur as Uppe vision Teacher and. therefore, as per the $0vernmentpolicy, the petitioner is entitled to be posted, as far as possible, at the plage, where her husband is ‘s rving the State Government. He further submits that he is not pressing his petition at this stage‘ however, the petitioner may be allowed to flle fre h representation against her transfer order of Annex‘ure-P/1 beforeresponden No.1, as her earlier representationshave ' not been considered by'the State G vernment and respondent No.1 be further directed to decide the same within citied period. Learnedvcounsel for the Sta e submits that in case, the petitioner mes fresh representation against her t sfer before respondent No1 the same shaii be consudered and decided y the said authority Within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of re resentatlon in View of the submrssrons ade by learned counsei for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of wth tiberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondent 0.1 within a period of 10 days from today, who in turn shall decide the same thln a further period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of representatlon in ccordance With law o //7; // r Barve W t' n r i e n r I