...^" C^-fcro ^ii^S-^^ -7 ^•^^a^^ii^ 'FTi"'"!'ipiLg —--istjini IN TOnBHIGH COURT OF JUMCATURE AT BELASPUR (C.G.l W.P^ro......^.<:'.^:3......./2006 PETITIONER: ^ J?4"^-" -v&!^5/' ywy yy 1. EUzabeth Toppo D/o Shri Stephen •t^^ Toppo, Aged 47 year's Working as Asst. Teacher (Education Department) at Govt. Primary School, Dhirmunda, Lailunga, R/o Birhipani, Tehsil Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS .^ P"'o<-.<4(' ^'^^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhatdsgarh) /'fi f ^f /2. District Education ofBcer, Education ^v \^ v ^~' ——-———-— /^, -^ <^' Department, Raigarh Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) .C^i\ i y, PETITION XJNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF mDIAFOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER OF LIKE NTURE ETC:- 3^ XI-HC-78 TS? '<11<IICI'M, ESTflu'IS, KlCfl'Hy <^-10-CV -70SS/06 *TTRCn *<-ncd ^ 200 3TI^?r<<att> (l^^yT) sn^rqirf^iN; (iwsn^TSiiiw g^TWdfstr-ni^r °t>i<irci<f1-< iii<iT^'te^<Ri«i< ^aif^iran^T Subhssh 19.12.2006 Shri Hor-ish Khutiya, <4d^ocote and Shri Akshay Yadav, <4dvocate for the petitioner(s). M.3. Sunita Jain, Pane! Law^er for the respondents/State. M/ith the consent of teat^nsd counse! for the parties, the w'rit petition fs he.eir'd fina!!y. Common of^ier dictated in[ open Court, passed sepfliratety. Wr-it Petition (S.) 7058/20)6 i'n Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^^ P.T.O. HI6H CQURT^F^HHATnS©ARHAT BILASPW W. P.fSVNo 7058/2006 Pe+itioners Versus 9iantu Ram Tiger and otiiers State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.?S5 No. 70B9/2G06 Elizabeth Toppo Versus Respondenti W. P.CS) No. 7060/2006 Versus KeSDondents Fujyan+' -Sufab %alxo State of Oihattisgarh &unother S; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agnihotn. J Siri 1-larish Khutiya, Advocate and Shri Akshoy Yadav, Advocute for he petltioner(5). s. Sunita Jain, Pane! Law^er fo;- tiie respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 19 day of Decsmber, 2006) TTie foilowing order of the Court is for the petitioners as also for •tiie State/respondents jointly submit tiiat the facts of the present wrlt aetitions are similar to that of in W. P. No. 5742/2006 (AAadan Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which vws disposed of vide order dated 27.10.2006. They further submit that the question of law invotved is also the same. 2. In view of the above stated subfflissions made by learned counse! for the parties the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order da+ed 27.10.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 5742/2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be piaced on record in connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhs^h