IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.808 of 2010 SYED SHAUKAT ALI son of Syed Nazrul Rahman, Resident of Mohalla- Bowly, Phulwarisharif, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna …Plaintiff/Appellant Versus 1. BIBI ALIA KHATOON W/o Late S. M. Abdul Mokarim, 2. Syed Shah Mahfooz Ali son of Late S. M. Abdul Mokarim, Both residents of Mohalla- Choti Khanquah, Phulwarisharif, P.S. - Phulwarisharif, District- Patna …Defendants/Respondents ----------- For the appellant : Mr. Abbas Haider, Advocate. For the respondent nos. 1-2: Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate For the respondent nos. 3-7: Mr. Najeeb Ahmad, Advocate ------------- 7/ 24.02.2011 Heard the parties. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 12.07.2010 passed by the Sub-Ordinate Judge IX, Patna, in Title Suit No.112 of 2006, by which the application filed for injunction has been refused by the trial court. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that prima facie case is in his favour as there is balance of convenience and irreparable loss would be caused to him if injunction was not allowed and there was urgency in the matter since the respondents had already sold certain piece of land. On the other hand, counsel for the respondents have placed before this court a decision reported in 1998 (2) PLJR 120 (Lallan Prasad Vs. Parmeshwar Singh), wherein, it was held that in a suit for specific performance temporary injunction cannot be granted till the execution of the sale deed. In view of the direct decision on this point, I see no 2 reason to interfere in the order impugned. The application is dismissed. However, the District and Sessions Judge, Patna, is directed to ensure that Title Suit No. 489 of 2004, Title Suit No. 323 of 2003 and Title SuitNo.324 of 2003 are all listed before the same court for better understanding of the case and they are disposed of within a time limit set by the court after taking into consideration the issues involved in the suits. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)