IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9324 of 2009 1. PRADEEP KUMAR PANDIT, SON OF SRI SHAKTI NATH PANDIT, VILLAGE + POST BANDEHARA, VIA MEHDIPUR, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 2. MANISH KUMAR, SON OFSRI HIYALAL SHARMA, POST NAGAR, P.S. PARWATTA, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 3. RAJESH RANJAN BHARTI, SON OF SRI JAGDISH PRASAD CHAURASIA, VILLAGE AND POST BHUTAULI MALPA,PS. CHAUTHAM, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 4. KUSUM LATA KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI PRADEEP KUMAR PANDIT, VILLAGE + POST BANDEHARA, VIA MEHDIPUR, DISTRICT KHAGARIA. 5. USHA KUMARI, SON OF SRI RAM NARESH PANDIT, VILLAGE+POST BANDEHARA, VIA MEHDIPUR, DISTRICT KHAGARIA----PETITIOENRS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 3. JOINT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 4. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KHAGARIA. 5. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 6. DY. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR. 7. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS GOVT. OF BIHAR---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are the Assistant-cum-Clerks. They were appointed against the Advertisement No. 44/98 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay scale of Rs.4000-6000/- as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 13577 of 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under order dated 17.12.2007, against which the State respondents preferred L.P.A. No. 522 of 2008, which was also dismissed under order dated 29.9.2008. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008. 4. Let the petitioners file representation before the District Magistrate, Khagaria who should consider the same in the light of the - 2 - aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008 and pass appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)