1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15163 of 2011 S.Bhavani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By the Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichirappalli District. 2.A.Black Solomon Chandrasekar, Headmaster, Sengundar Higher Secondary School, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. 3.Boobalan, Graduate Assistant, Sengundar Higher Secondary School, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st respondent police to investigate the crime and the FIR lodged against the respondents 2 and 3 in Cr.No.417 of 2011 dated 27.10.2011 under Sections 294(b), 403, 406 and 424 IPC and to initiate suitable legal action against them according to law. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Singan For Respondent-1: Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER Seeking for issuance of suitable direction to the first respondent police to investigate the case registered in Cr.No.417 of 2011 dated 20.07.2011 under Sections 294(b), 403, 406 and 424 of IPC and to initiate suitable action against the accused persons, the petitioner has come up with this petition. 2.Heard both sides. 3.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the certificates of the petitioner were reverted to the custody of the School and they should be kept with the custody of the school authorities, after they were returned by the District Educational Officer, Trichy. He would further submit that though the District Educational Officer has returned the certificates of the petitioner to the school authorities, instead of handing over the said records to the Secretary of the School Committee, the respondents 2 and 3 are holding the same for their own purpose. He would further submit that the first respondent police is not taking serious action against the respondents 2 and 3 and suitable direction may be given to the first respondent police to expedite the investigation and to produce those records and to file necessary charge-sheet, against the erring persons. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit in his argument that the case has been registered on the complaint given by the petitioner in Cr.No.417 of 2011 and investigation is being carried on. He would further submit that certificates as well as other records of the petitioner would be soon recovered and it would be handed over to the petitioner and action will be taken against the erring persons namely the 2nd and 3rd respondents. He would further submit that investigation would be completed in a near future and charge sheet would be filed. On that basis, sufficient time may be given for the said purpose. 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the case registered on the complaint given by the petitioner against the respondents 2 and 3 in Cr.No.417 of 2011 is being investigated. According to the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the police would get a break through and provide relief to the petitioner in the near future. Therefore it is necessary for the court to grant two months time for the first respondent police to do investigation and take action by filing necessary charge sheet. 6.With the above direction, this petition is ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Police Station, Trichirappalli District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1CC TO MR.V.SINGAN, ADVOCATE SR.41718 Vs SR : 13.12.2011 : 2p/4c Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15163 of 2011 25.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/