HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No. 4387 OF 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed by the petitioners-Accused Nos. 2, 3 5 and 6 under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relaxation of conditions imposed in Crl.M.P.No. 1446 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District dated 7-4-2010. 2. Heard. 3. In the circumstances stated in the petition, the conditions are modified as follows “instead of appearing before the SHO, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District twice daily in between 10 AM or 10 PM for a period of two months or till the date of filing of the charge sheet whichever I earlier and further imposed a condition that they shall give effect to the terms and conditions of the compromise arrived between the parties respectively.” 4. It is clear from the facts of this case that the petitioners intend to take advantage of the fraud played by them. 5. As seen from the record, a joint memo was filed after filing the bail application requesting the Court to refer the matter to Lok Adalat on the ground that the parties have compromised the matter on certain terms and conditions. The impugned order also reveals that in view of the filing of such memo, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor did not seriously oppose the bail petition, however, requested the court to impose a condition that the parties should get the compromise recorded before the Lok Adalat. Accordingly, the learned Magistrate observed that the petitioners shall give effect to the terms and conditions of the compromise arrived at between the parties respecting the joint memo already filed and get the compromise recorded before the Lok Adalat without fail. 6. The parties who seek justice must come to the court with clean hands. It appears that the petitioners were arrested and they were remanded to judicial custody. They filed Crl.M.P. No.1446 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada seeking regular bail. The order dated 7-4-2010 passed by the learned Magistrate clearly shows that a joint memo was filed requesting the Court to refer the matter to the Lok Adalat on 8-4-2010. Thus it is clear that an impression has been given to the court that the parties have already settled the matter and in view of the same it appears that the learned Magistrate has granted bail to the petitioners on certain conditions. Having obtained bail on the representation that they have already settled the matter out of court and having filed a memo to refer the matter to Lok Adalat, the petitioners should not have any grievance with regard to the order of the learned Magistrate directing them to get the compromise recorded before the Lok Adalat. If at all the petitioners have already issued three cheques to the learned counsel for the defacto-complainant, as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners, nothing comes in their way to get the matter recorded before the Lok Adalat. If at all there was no compromise between the parties and a false representation was made to the Court that the parties have compromised the matter, the prosecution may file a petition to cancel the bail granted to the petitioners, since fraud cannot allowed to be played on the Courts. 7. In the circumstances, I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ______________________ B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J. 26th May 2010. KTL/IVD