:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.358 OF 2007 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.358 OF 2007 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.358 OF 2007 Kotak Securities Limited .. Petitioner. Versus Ms.K.Anasuya & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.S.P.Srivastav for petitioner. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19th October, 2007. DATE : 19th October, 2007. DATE : 19th October, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Srivastava at length. Perused the subject award. 2. All that the Arbitrator has done is to apply some equitable principle and award a sum of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the respondent. It is not as if this court is approving the approach of the parties or the reasonings of the Arbitrator in all such cases. In the peculiar facts of this case and considering that both were responsible, :2: the Arbitrator has made a fair and just so also equitable award. The sum also is not excessive and exhorbitant so as to call upon this Court to interfere with the award. Therefore, even if no notice was served, I took up this petition for admission and despite his pursuasive efforts, Mr.Srivastava could not convince me to interfere with the award for the sum of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the respondent. No reason to interfere. Petition is disposed of. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)