THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :9053 of 2007 DATED:26-04-2007 Smt.Bodepudi Ramadevi. ..... PETITIONER AND The Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad, Commissionerate, Hyderabad & 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents on the representation of the petitioner, dated 27-08-2006 & 08-04-2007, as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the representation of the petitioner by providing police protection to the petitioner and her property in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.3.00 in Sy.No.45 of Miyapur village, Serilingampally mandal, Rangareddy District. 3. It is stated that the petitioner made representations, dated 27-08-2007 and 09-04-2007, to the 1st respondent- Station House Officer, Miyapur in which it is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.3.00 of the land in Sy.No.45 of Miyapur village, Serilingampally mandal, Rangareddy District, having purchased the same in 1999, and also obtained a judgment, dated 02-11-2006, in O.S.No.705 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rangareddy District restraining Saidayya Naidu and B.Sridhar from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property by way of perpetual injunction but even after obtaining the decree the said persons are illegally interfering and trying to dispossess the petitioner and threatening her to sell away the said property. In spite of receipt of the said representation of the petitioner, no action has been taken so far. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and take appropriate action on the representation made by the petitioner, dated 27-08-2006 and 08-04-2007, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 26th April, 2007. Tsy