^ ^? ,t». c ,r- to^( BEFORE THE HON'BL& HIQH COUICT OF CHHATriSCjARH ATBaASPURtC.G.l WRIT HETmON N0.-5^?^ PETITIQNER ^^". .^yy^ /€^^ ,.^^-t' <?'tf&••" / Smt. Yasheshwari Dbruv, aged about 42 years, wife of Shri M.L. Dhruv, worldng as Asstt Professor, Goverrunent Girls College, Durg, R/o Qtr No. 3-C, Street No.16, Sector 6, Bhilai, Distf. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ ^sss—s% ^®^'???^ ^•s^ ./. *~~ /' '^""S'i-'S'^Si* ~'/^t ''i'V r S'iS* u'^>$y' ''"^'sssEa^ 1. State of Chfaattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Dau Kalyan Sing^ti Bhawran, Raipur (C.G.) /2,. The Deputy Secretary, Dept of Higher Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) /3. The Direetor, Oepartment of ffigher JEducation, Raipur (Chha.ttisgarh) WRFT PETmON UNDERARTICLES 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ?JS^Sii^^^S^^S^^SB^^iS818^SIKSI^^SSffS^ISS3SBSSSS^!S^S!SSS»SS9S KS^3S»SSS^aais'sSS9R!!WSSWS^m!!^^ wvs'wwwit XI-HC-22 d-ai^JHIc)^, ^Tf1yjl(S; icldlUy 3<1^14s|ch <4Wrtl sb*1|ct>- • • •"••••••••-/••• • g^- 200 Rfc-A' SD^TW R-ii+an^r sbfiqidfer y Ban/e sii^i ^wiwofer 12-7-2QOe:. • Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel fo. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy GQV advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The main.grievance raised bytl has been transferred considering her she is not surplus. She is working ag are otlier vacant posts also. Apart fror as Senior Technician in the Bhilai husband and wife should remain posts been considered by the respondents. Learned counse! for the petitic the petitioner may be altov'/ed to makf No.1 and in turn respondent No.1 bi learned counsel for respondents has ni Havina heard learned counsel facts and oiroumstances of the oase,w of the case, prayer made by learned reasonable, therefore, the petitioner is along with copy ofthis petition to resp| in turn respondent No.1 is direoted to weeks from the date of receipt of th^ considering all the points raised by t!ie| With the dlrection aforesaid, ths Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.25^ Parties are entitled for certifiecll <*i'iifc)41-i iitfi-fTff r^L<II <Riwi< ^^l^irsn^r the petitioner. 'Advocate for the State/respondents, on petitioner in this writ petition is that she ^s surplus Assistant Professor whereas, inst a regular sanctioned post and there that, the petitioner's husband is working fteel Plant, therefore, the principle that |d at one place as far as possible has not her submitted that in the circumstances, a detailed representatlon to respondent directed to decide the same to which objection. for the parties and having regard to the thout expressing any opinion on the merit ;ounsel for the petitioner is just; fair and ih'owed to make a detai!ed representation indent No.1 within a period of 5 days and lecide the representation wiShin another 3 representation, in an objectjve manner, petitioner, in accordance with law. petition stands disposed of. 8/2006 also stands disposed of. ;opyofthisorder. Sdi- L.C.Bhsaoo Judge ('fl^^Rdil) i^ ,jy ^v«6' o ^