IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4277 of 1989 Date of decision : 10.12.2010 Om Parkash … Petitioner. Versus Chief Canal Officer and anther …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Mr.Sanjiv Bura, Advocate for Mr.Rameshwar Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.O.P.Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. Mr.S.S.Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ritu Bahri, J. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr.Rajinder Singh, Chief Canal Officer (YC) Haryana, states that the matter has been compromised between the parties. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Parties are at liberty to approach the Court in case if there is any dispute regarding the above fact for revival of the writ petition. (Ritu Bahri) Judge 10.12.2010 sd