HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Appellant (Petltioner) HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. e?f Writ Appeal No. 238 of 2007 Sushil Kumar Patet, aged about 33 yeai-s, S/o Shri Yadumani Patel, resident of Viilage Banjipali, Post Office>Saiheona, Via Sariya, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralay, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Janpad Panchayat Baramkela, through its Chief Executive Officer at Baramkela, district Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Additional Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, District Raigarh(C.G.) appeal under Rute 157(10) readwjth SectiQn 2(1) of the Appeal to Dlvision Bench of the Chhattisaarh Hicjh Court Rules. 2005 Present: None for the appellant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General for the State/ respondents No. 1, 3 & 4. Shri Vinay Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.2. ORDER (13th July, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellant. .' '&'sffatte, 'i ^S??K:^ '.„. :>J^ ''•ts'»; ty 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the writ appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The writ apoeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of orosecution. Sdl- Chief Justice Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge subbu