IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6223 of 2010(O) -------------------------------------- AS.112/2009 of SUB COURT, TIRUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- REJI, S/O.CHUNGATH KOCHUNNI, KUTTIPPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- PAPPINISSERY SAIDALI, S/O.SAIDU, KATTIPPARUTHI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No. 6223 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of February, 2010. JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Sub court, Tirur to hear and dispose of A.S. 112 of 2009. 2. Petitioner is the owner of the property, which is the subject matter of O.S. 205 of 2003 on the file of the Munsiff's Court, Tirur. The suit was one for recovery of plaint B schedule property, which according to the petitioner formed part of plaint A schedule property. Copy of the plaint is produced as Ext.P1. The respondent filed O.S. 147 of 2001 in relation to the very same property praying for a prohibitory injunction. That suit was dismissed on 30.9.2002. Copy of the judgment is produced as Ext.P2. The plaintiff in that suit carried the matter in appeal as A.S. 104 of 2002 before the Sub Court, Tirur. When the said appeal was pending, O.S. 205 of 2003 filed by the petitioner was decreed ex-parte. WPC.6223/2010. 2 On an application filed by the defendants in the suit, that was set aside. The suit is about to be listed. In these circumstances, all that the petitioner prays is that there may be a direction to the Sub Court, Tirur to hear and dispose of A.S. 112 of 2009 as expeditiously as possible. 3. Considering the facts narrated by the petitioner, it is felt that the prayer made is only just and reasonable. Therefore, there will be a direction to the Sub Court, Tirur to hear and dispose of A.S. 112 of 2009 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.