1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1391 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.160 OF 2005 Girish Chimanlal Parikh ..Plaintiff vs. Siddharth Ramanlal Parikh & Ors. ..Defendants ----- Mr.Tushar Bhavsar i/b. Ranjit & Co. for Plaintiff Dr.Birendra Saraf i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Co. for Defendants ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the Defendants seeking inspection of documents which are referred to paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Plaint. 2. Initially an order was passed by Justice Shri S.C. Dharmadhikari on 13th June, 2006 in Chamber Summons No. 1190 of 2005, which was taken out by the Defendants seeking inspection of documents which were referred to in Schedule -1 of the said Chamber Summons. In paragraph 5 of the said order, the Court 2 directed the Plaintiff to grant inspection of documents which were mentioned in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the plaint on 26th June, 2006 at 5.30 p.m. and, accordingly, the said Chamber Summons was disposed of after giving certain directions. 3. It is the case of the Defendants, however, that the original documents in respect of the partnership deed of C.B. Parekh & Co. dated 8.7.1970 and the original Deed of Dissolution of C.B. Parekh and Co. dated 31.7.1996 was not shown and only photocopies have been given. 4. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff submits that the Plaintiff do not have original copies of the partnership deed and deed of dissolution and, therefore, xerox copies have been tendered. The extract from the office of the Registrar of the Partnership Firm has been given by the Plaintiff to the Defendants. So far as the books of accounts and income tax records relating to the payments which are referred in paragraph 9 are concerned, the Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submits that inspection of the said books of accounts and income tax records in respect of the said two transactions referred to in paragraph 9 will be given within two weeks from today. 3 5. In view of this statement, the Chamber Summons does not survive and, accordingly, disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)