Pradeep Kumar Yerewar aged about 45 years, 5/0 Shri B.D.Yerewar, Occupatien-Service, Werkmg as mspec‘mr of Poiice, District Special Branch, Dhamtari (Reiieved on 03.93.209) District Dhamtari Chhatt§sgam VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Govemment 9f Chhattisgarh, Department a‘f Heme (Peiiee) Mantraiaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Diyector General 0‘? Poiice, Police Headquartem, x Raipw‘, Chhattisgarh. chairman, Palice Establishment Board, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Chief Eiectiah officer, Ghhattisgarh. 5. mspecior Generai of Pmica (Admi’m Police Headquarters; Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6.‘ inspector Gueneral of Police, Police Range, Durg, Chhattisgarh. ?. Superintendent of Poiice, District Dhamieri, Chhattisgarh. N UNDER ARTmLE 226 OF THE CGNsTiTUTlON GF HNDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri £atish K. Agnihotri, i. PresentShri R.$.Marhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shrf Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the State/respondents. ORAL {EREER {Passed on 27th day of March, 2009) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not Want to contest the petition on merite at this stage, however, prays that the respondent authorities may be idireoted to consider anti decide his pending epresentations, ae expeditiously a5 poesibie. hri Thakur, ieakrned..i3.epnty Adxrocate Genera! for the State] respondents submits that if the representations dated 03.03.2009 (Annexure P/8) and 21.03.2009 {Annexure P/Q) are pending consideration, the same shaii be considered and decided by the authorities in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from today. in view/of the foregoing, according to learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication, Accordingly, the petition stands gisoosed of. i / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT glLASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S) No. 1623 of QOGQ ‘ PEfiTiONER : L OC Chhattisgarh, Raipur, WEN PETiTm RESPONDENTS r $