1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.621 OF 2000 Vimal Narayan Phule .. Appellant. Vs. Bharat Narayan Phule & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.B.N.Lad for the appellant. Mr.V.G.Peshare for respondent nos.1. and 2. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2007 DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2007 DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2007 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below by which the suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs stands decreed. The suit was filed for declaration that they are the heirs and legal representatives of Narayan and they are entitled for terminal benefits from defendant no.6 - employer. The appellant claims to be the wife of Narayan. Both the courts below, however, after having taken into consideration the entire evidence on record have held that the appellant is not a legally wedded wife of Narayan. However, the children of the appellant and Narayan, that is, defendant nos.2 to 5 are held to be entitled for 2 2 2 terminal benefits from the employer. No substantial question of law is either raised or involved in the appeal. Considering the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below and as I find that there is sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering extremely limited jurisdiction of this court under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to disturb the findings of fact this appeal deserves to be dismissed. Order accordingly. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)