IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15054 of 2010 UMA SHANKAR SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 20.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by a transfer within one year of his previous posting. The submission is that there is no justifiable administrative reason though mentioned in the order. Counsel for the State rightly submits that administrative reasons should not lightly be interfered by the Court in transfer matters. The petitioner is unable to demonstrate violation of any statutory rules and/or prejudice caused to the service conditions by transfer. If the petitioner has represented against the transfer that is an administrative aspect to be considered by the respondents themselves. The writ application is disposed with the observation to consider the representation and dispose it off within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)