IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15107 of 2008 THE INNUENDO COMMUNICATIONS(TIC) , 7A/66 , WEA KAROLBAGH, NEW DELHI, THROUGH VIKRAM SHARMA, SON OF SHRI RAVINDER SHARMA, RESIDENT OF BL-128, L BLOCK ANAND VIHAR, HARINAGAR, NEW DELHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, 3. DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIES, BIHAR, UDYOG BHAWAN, PATNA. ----------- 2/ 05.05.2010 Some of the payments have been made to the petitioner. But this payment is not according to the work done and the bill claimed. The nature of dispute being such, this Court will not pass any order in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Disposal of the writ application will not come in the way of the petitioner in pursuing the remedy in any appropriate forum. The writ application is thus disposed of. ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J ) BTiwary/