1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4588 OF 2006 Jayesh Navalshankar Joshi ..Applicant V/s. Mandar Ratnakar Chogle & anr. ..Respondents Mr.M.M.Khokawala, Advocate, for applicant Mr.S.R.Mishra, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Ms.A.A.Mane, A.P.P, for the State CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2008 P.C. . Heard. 2. Without dissecting the mutual understanding between the parties and several dealings the short question pressed in is the complainant and the accused were the partners in the firm Chanak Estate Agency and a cheque in question is allegedly issued signed by the accused in favour of the complainant, another partner of the same firm. Obviously, there is no legal and subsisting liability between one partner from another. The accounts were not 2 settled nor the affairs of the Firm taken over by accused No.1 alone. In the set of above facts, application for leave to appeal is rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)