IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Appeal No. 835 of 2004 in Writ Petition No.l932 of 2002 with Notice of Motion No.48 of 2005 M/s Boolani Eng Corpn ...... appellants vs Mun Corpn of Mumbai and ors.....Respondents Mr. R.M.Nakhawa i/b V B Dhawan for appellants Mr.Vinod Mahadik for respondents CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.J.VAZIFDAR JJ. Dated l7.l.2005 Dated l7.l.2005 Dated l7.l.2005 P.C: Heard advocates. 2. Admit. By consent appeal is taken for hearing. 3. The advocate on record for respondent nos.l to 4 waives service. 4. In the light of the order passed by the Division Bench in Appeal No.804 of 2004 we are satisfied that the appeal may be disposed of by the following order: "The respondent nos l to 4 shall not take any steps in recovery of the amount on the basis of the revised enhanced assessment until disposal of the writ petition no.2245 of 2004. If the appellants herein (Original writ petitioners) file an undertaking in the writ petition within four weeks from today that in the event of writ petition being dismissed and the revised enhanced assessment being sustained by the learned single Judge, they would pay to the respondent nos.l to 4, the amount of revised enhanced assessment within three months of the decision in the writ petition unless ordered otherwise in appeal that may be filed against the said order."