HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.6203 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2011 **** Renu Kumari . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. RK Arya, Advocate for the petitioner **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner was initially appointed as a Substitute Computer Teacher on daily wages and later on the nature of appointment was converted to contractual basis. She now seeks a direction to the respondents for regularization of her services in terms of the policy decision dated 02.12.2010 taken by the State Government in regard thereto. A representation is also said to have been made by her to the respondents on 15.03.2011 (Annexure P2) which has not yet been responded. (2). Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on her entitlement for regularization of services, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner as contained in the representation dated 15.03.2011 in terms of the policy decision dated 02.12.2010 (Annexure P1), within a period of four months and if found entitled to, grant her the same from the due date. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 07.04.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge