1 APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2636 OF 2003 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s order appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. __________________________________________________________ None for the parties. .. Coram: J.N. PATEL, J. Date: 24th July, 2006. P.C. . Heard. . In this writ petition the petitioner is seeking direction against respondent no. 2 to hear and finally dispose of Revision Application No. 56 of 1993 expeditiously with other auxiliary reliefs. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the petition has become infructuous as the bank has initiated steps under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets 2 and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and further the petitioner has also opted under the Scheme of One Time Settlement and has also given option to settle the claim under One Time Settlement Scheme and paid 25% of the debt. In view of this the revision does not survive before the District Deputy Registrar. As such, there is no merit in the petition. The same is dismissed. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel,J.) ..