vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1848 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1848 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1848 OF 2007 Hemant H. Chokhawala ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Niranjan Mundargi for Petitioner Mrs.A.A. Mane, APP, for Respondent Mr.Dilip Bodke for Respondent No.2 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: JUNE 9, 2008 JUNE 9, 2008 JUNE 9, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petition has been filed for setting aside the order passed in C.C. No.611 of 2005 directing the police to file a report under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. It is well settled that the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction u/s 482 of the Cr.P.C. should not interfere as a matter of course in investigations ordered under section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. This is not an exceptional case as the learned advocate for the petitioner has tried to point out. According to the learned advocate, the petitioner was merely authorised by the exporter company to deal with the litigations which were pending before this Court in which the exporter company was a party. If the police find that this is so and that there is nothing incriminating against the petitioner the police would submit such a report. In these circumstances, I see no reason to interfere with the order passed directing the investigation. : 2 : 2. Writ Petition is rejected.