H¥§%§ QBQRT Gig ~3L5EHCAW‘E3RE CHM-‘VTESGiiRE-k EIL§k$FL§R MGL§ EENa‘SH : §-§0§€*ELE $H§§i é§GE§$H 8H§LLI~E AQCJ Wi'ét Fetiiicn N0‘3§3? of 3§9§ :3 ‘3‘!T§®%§ER Awie$h Diwedi s/o Nam ' umaf Di "View, Amed 24 years), Rio \lma » Mudipan Téhsn am Distt. Rajnandgam VER$U$ RE$FQ§€§EN§$ State af Madhya Prades'n Minevat Reaources Depamnen‘i, Valiabh Bhawan, Bhopai Coileotor. Rajnandgaon Baldev Singh Bhatia, Sfo D8. Bha‘tia Rio MaMa Nagar, Duig. Wk) Peiition‘ under Artacie Present: None for the p Shri Sanjay S. Agrawah Govt Advocate Ior the Stake. r em; mew {Pagme m 25$ Jame, 2am The pet%tianer whc was granted a quarry )eaee, entered in to an agreement daied 29th March ”1995 for a period of three years far extraction of ‘ Mme Stone On ine other hand, the Coliestor rejected the applicaiion for grant of quarw reaee to reepona‘ent N013 Bardev Singh Bhatia. Aggrieved by the eeid arder the reepondeni No. 3 had fired an appear before the Divisional Commissioner, Raipur which wee heard by the Addi'tionai Commis‘sioner who afier hearing the appeai by order dated 215‘ Jury Q5 allowed the same and remanded the matter to the CoHeotor with a direction to grant the iease ’m respondent No3 for a period of five years. Aggrieved by the said order the oetitioner has fited this petttion praying for quashtng the order passed by the Commissioner referred to hereinabover Neither the writ petition has been V admitted tiil teée+ nor any interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner Only the notices have been issued to the reepondente The outer iimit \i ~\ oi” theiperiod of the tease was five years which seems to have come to an end.u&jWV Mon has become Accordingly, I am of the comsidered opinion that ms pe mfructuous and i‘t is di$miased a8 such Sd/- ‘ Acting Chief Justice /