IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3188 of 2011 GHURAN PRASAD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a bona fide land dispute going on that whether the lands in question were public lands or whether they belonged to cremation ground. He submits that Title Suit No. 51 of 1993 is at the verge of conclusion and judgment is awaited. Therefore, the respondents may be restrained from constructing any boundary wall over the lands in question for short a duration awaiting the final judgment. Counsel for the State has invited attention of the Court to Paragraph-5 of the pleadings that injunction had been sought in the Title suit as far back as 1994 and it appears that on 2.6.1994 the relief was declined as no order for injunction were passed. The petitioner had a remedy and he availed it in the year 1994 and then abandoned it. There is a civil suit pending. If the petitioner did not 2 take his prayer for injunction it to its logical conclusion at the necessary time today the Court finds it difficult to invoke its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the facts of the case to pass any interim orders of nature prayed for. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)