^$ :fc-<. AppliGant HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA. J M.C.C.No. 309 of 2010 L.N. Maheshwari Aged about 64 years S/o. AnandSwaroopMaheShwaft, ; Retired Chjef (3eneral Mahag6r,(TS/CS to GMD) R/o-Anand Kuteer, NearGeetanjali City, Phase-ll, Bahatarai Road, Bilaspur (CG) Versus Non- aDDlicant CoallndiaLtd. GoalBhawan; 10, Netaji Sybhash Road, Kolkata-700 001 South Eastern Coalfields Ud. SECL, Post Offjce, Seepat Rbad, Bitaspur (CG) Present:--.,'.,:':.,:,;• ; ' :.: 11:';':. .-':"•'.•' ' TShriG.Mukhopadhyaya,counselfor-theapplicant. ORALORDER (24th June, 2010) The petitjoner has filed thjs ^petition and prayed for restoration of WP(s) No.3322/07 as the same was dismisseid on 21 Uanuary, 2009. The applicant has also filed an application (IA N6.01) for cpndoning the delay of 439 days in fllingthis restoration petition. The applicant has stated in his affidavit that the writ petition was dismissed a? his counsel did not appear on the date when the matter was called. He leamed about dismissal of the petition when he contacted hjs counsel andthereafter, hemovedthisapplicationforrestorafion. HavingheardleaFnedcounself6rtheapplicant,consideringthatthewrit petition was dismissed way back on21a January, 200& ancf the that the reasons assigned by the applicant for delay in filing this petiUon, are not satisfactoFy, the application (IA No.01) for condonation of delay is rejected. Consequently, the restoration application is also rejected as barred by limitation. I Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge