0 \- ‘ - / IA £rth hIGi COUi OF KAtNATAKA AC NGiLOi(E D4i?j £k1. I6rhiAi OF JANIJkRY 2998 &J 0 At Lit HON’nLk MR. JULI Y. bHAoKnR RAG fl0.9’0L’9. BiL WtLN: ri, Bolabasapa /o Rangappa Balarnashi, Age; Major, 0cc: Agril, Rio Malapur, Laluk: Mudhol, District: Bgeot. ,,Petitioner, (By ri. 1.0. Gachhinamath, Adv.) aNti: I. Mahadevappa /o bahiddawva Mang. A: Major, 0cc; Agril 4/c Malapur, Laluk: Mudhol, District: Bagalkot, 2, Kadappa ta/o Hanamappa naregudai, Age; Major, 0 c’: Agril, h/c Malapur, Taluk: Mudhol, District; Bagalkot. .,r€5pOnQefltS. Civil Aevision Petition is filed U/s,ll5 of C.P.C, against the orcer dtec llOl997 pasnd in 0,z, No.296 of 1994 on the file of the AGdl, Civil Judge, (JrrDn.) Mudhol, flGa ibis civil Revision Petition coming on for Mmission this day, the court made the following: 0 dDR ibis revision is filea by the plaintiff assailing the order of lower Court on LAs filea by applicant plaintiff U/C 16 11.1 & P and U/O 18 R-2 & thib-dule 4 nw ,l5l for summoning the witness and also seeking pennission to lead further evidence. ihe Court below has considred the contention of the petition and found that the petitioner/plaintiff is protracting the OasC from the ginning, When his evidence was there he has not produced Tahsiidar before the Court and this petition is filed at the fag end of the case, i perfectly agree with the order of court below and I find no &son to interfere. Hence, petition is dismissed, -4 * ..by: MR. Cs C,by: rnsta I& a