IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3042 of 2010 ADITYA KUMAR, SON OF RAMBABU SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BASANT, POLICE STATION- AURAI IN THE DISTRICT OF MUZAFFARPUR. ………………………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 4. 23.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 468, 469 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per the allegation set up in the First Information Report, the mischief had allegedly been done by one Chandan, who was allegedly working in the shop owned by the petitioner, however, that fact has been denied by the petitioner. Allegation is that on forged papers a sim card was issued, which had allegedly been used in course of - 2 - another occurrence, in which murder had taken place. The sim card was allegedly used by the aforesaid Chandan by calling the deceased prior to the occurrence. It has also been submitted that the petitioner had nothing to do with the aforesaid occurrence regarding the murder. I have perused the report of the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, regarding the antecedent of the petitioner, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner is accused only in Karja P.S. Case No.115 of 2009, which is present one. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Aditya Kumar, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Karja P.S. Case No.115 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall remain present on - 3 - each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial in the court below without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)