IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3881 of 2000 Between: 1 Sree Rama Chandrudu S/o Mallesu R/o Cuddapah District. 2 K. Lakshmi Sujathamma D/o Balachandran R/o Cuddapah District. 3 G. Jayasudha D/o G. Lakshmi Narsaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 4 P.Kulayappa S/o P. Ganganna R/o Cuddapah District. 5 B. Mohan S/o Mopuraiah R/o Cuddapah District. 6 P. Ashok Babu S/o Subbaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 7 A. Sivakumar S/o A. Subramanyam R/o Cuddapah District. 8 A. Sankaranarayana S/o A. Subramanyam R/o Cuddapah District. 9 K.Alluraiah S/o K. Pedeta Alluraiah R/o Cuddapah District. 10 P.V. Subba Reddy S/o P. Subba Reddy R/o Cuddapah District. 11 N. Chinna Muni Reddy S/o N. Muni Reddy R/o Cuddapah District. 12 S. Irshad Ahmed S/o S. Mahaboob Basha R/o Cuddapah District. 13 G. Sudarshan S/o Gangaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 14 S. Kareemullah S/o S.Mahabooba Basha R/o Cuddapah District. 15 G. Suvarna Babu Ganganna R/o Cuddapah District. 16 Syed Mustak Basha S/o S.Ameerjan R/o Cuddapah District. 17 Kalva Babu S/o K. Musalaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 18 S. Moulali S/o S.Akbar R/o Cuddapah District. 19 K. Bheemudu S/o K. Ramaiah R/o Cuddapah District. 20 D. Govinda Reddy S/o D. Narayana Reddy R/o Cuddapah District. 21 B. Papaiah S/o B. Narayana Reddy R/o Cuddapah District. 22 Syed Mouddin S/o S.Khader Mohiddin R/o Cuddapah District. 23 S. Hidayathullah S/o S. Khader Mohiddin R/o Cuddapah District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Chairman, A.P. Transco, Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 Superintending Engineer, T.L.C. Circle, A.P. Transco, Cuddapah. 3 Cheif Engineer, T.L. & S.S., A.P. Transco, Sankarapuram, Cuddapah-2. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate Writ declaring the objections raised by the respondents vide Proceedings dt.10/8/1999 to deny absorption to the Petitioners under B.P.Ms.36 dt.18/5/1997 as arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional and to issue consequential direction to the respondents to absorb the Petitioners in accordance with B.P.Ms.36 dt.18/5/1997 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3881 OF 2000 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY 29th January, 2009 IBL