IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17950 of 2011 Ranjay Kr. Panday @ Ranjay Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03. 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is not named by the victim boy who recovered only after two days of the incident, if was kidnapped rather his name appears in statement of co-accused Rajiv Kumar dealing with mobile. A SIM was sold by him to co- accused Chhotu who used the SIM for demanding ransom. For petitioner it is said that while the SIM was purchased by Chhotu, this petitioner was accompanying him that also is denied. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10.000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Laheri P. S. Case No.16 of 2011. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)