IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 310 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.1.2010 Harish Kumar and another .. Petitioners v. Gurvinder Singh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate for the petitioners. Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the fact that the petitioner is challenging the sale of property owned by respondents No. 2 and 3 of which respondent No. 4 is the auction purchaser, his contest is only against the auction purchaser and service of respondents No. 1 to 3 would not be required for the purpose of decision of this petition. Mr. L.M. Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate appears for respondent No. 4, who is the contesting respondent being the auction purchaser. He fairly submitted that he will not execute the warrants of possession issued in his favour on account of sale of property in execution of the court decree till the next date of hearing fixed by the learned court below, i.e. 6.2.2010. Thereafter, he will abide by the orders of the learned court below on the application for interim stay filed by the petitioners. . In view of the fair stand of learned counsel for respondent No. 4, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the stand of the counsel for respondent No. 4. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 22.1.2010 mk