1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.4196 OF 2009 Manakchand Chunilal Munot .... Petitioner Vs. Janu Padu Patil & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Milind Parab i/b M/s. Milind Parab & Associates for the Petitioner. Shri V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for Respondent Nos.19 to 21. CORAM: D.D. SINHA AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 25, 2010 P.C: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The following facts are not in dispute. So far as the land in question, the award was passed way back on 5-7-1989. It is not in dispute that so far as the Notification under Section 4, published under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the names of the original respondents were recorded as owners (before their deletion). The petitioner has 2 not taken any objection during the course of Section 5A inquiry nor at any point of time till the award is passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer on 5-7-1989 under the Land Acquisition Act in respect of the land in question. It is also not in dispute that the names of respondent Nos.1 to 17 were shown as owners of the land in question in the award and they were also paid the compensation of the land in question. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner has not initiated any proceedings under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. 3. In the backdrop of the above referred undisputed facts, it is difficult for us to entertain the prayers made by the petitioner in the present petition. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. (D.D. SINHA, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)