1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2012/1996 (MANOHAR WASUDEORAO POHEKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ku. K.K. Pathak, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.D. Kothari, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JULY 21 , 2011 . It appears and it is also not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal would have jurisdiction to decide the issue involved in this case as the petitioner is a Government Servant. Ms Pathak, the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition and file the Original Application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal . Permission and liberty, both, are granted as prayed for. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal may accept the Original Application, if filed within a period of One Month. In case, the Original Application is filed by the petitioner within a period of One Month, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal may decide the same as early as possible as it is an extremly old matter. 2 No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE