IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5317 of 2006 BINDESHARI YADAV, SON OF LATE KHUDUR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHINDARPUR, P.S. HATHIDAH, DISTRICT PATNA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, “R” BLOCK, R.NO.6, PATNA. 2. GENERAL MANAGER HINDUSTAN FERTILIZER CORPORATION LIMITED,BARAUNI UNIT. 3. GENERAL MANAGER, FINANCE HINDUSTAN FERTILIZER CORPORATION LIMITED, BARAUNI UNIT. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4. 28.2.2011. Today again, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/Employees Provident Fund submits that in this case, counter affidavit has already been filed. However, he was not in a position to locate learned counsel for the petitioner and as such without serving copy on learned counsel for the petitioner, it has already been filed and same is on record. In this case, continuously no one is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. On 24.2.2011 and 25.2.2011 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, Shri Surajbansh Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/Employees Provident Fund is 2 present. Heard learned counsel for respondent/Employees Provident Fund. It was submitted that petitioner is not entitled to get his pension revised. The petition stands rejected due to non prosecution. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)