IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28337 of 2011(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ PEARS PAUL, CHIRAMEL HOUSE, ARANATTU KARA P.O., THRISSUR-680 618. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER(EDAPPALLY) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM-686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM-686 560. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.T.A.SHAJI,SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.28337/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22/10/2011 FOR SCRUTINISING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FOR THE COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION. P2 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/10/2011 FOR SCRUTINISING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FOR THE COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION. P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22/10/2011 FOR REVALUING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FOR THE COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION. P4 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/10/2011 FOR REVALUING THE ANSWER PAPER FOR THE SUBJECT ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FOR THE COMBINED 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATION. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28337 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Instrumentation Technology Engineering Course. The petitioner had appeared for the 1st and 2nd semester supplementary examination. When the result was declared, he had failed in the above paper. He applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer paper within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No. 28337 OF 2011 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge