^ HIGH CO'IJRT <>F €:HHATTI8GARHAT BILASPUR PETITIONER 'RESPONDENTS WRIT.PEllTIQN (S) No. 436 of2008 Bfami Ram Dwivedi, aged aboirt 66-years, son. ofLate Siiri- Heeraiiiam Diw^di,. Resid^rt of Sliaisibfau Chowk, Chh.ota Bazar, Chirimiri, Di^trict Korea VERSUS 1. State of CUiattisgarfi, Ttooy^i - Secr^ary, DepartiBeot of Sdioot ' Edacaiioti,^ Mantralaya,^ D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) . . 2. Ths Distriet Education Ofiicer, Korea, Disti'iet KoreaC-.G. 3. Admmistrator, tlirough . Principal, . Lahiri Multipurpose Hi^r Sec<Mxlary Scliool, Cliimiiri District Korea (C.G.) 4, The Director, DirectOjr^te, Pablic IixstitirtioB, Peiiiioii Bada,.Raipw,C.O. . . - - .. : . . VVMT PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrKJnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Sliri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Prcsent: ' Shri R.K.Jaiswal, Advocate fbr the petitioner, Slm U»N»S.Deo,Govermiie.tit Advocate with Sliri Aiviiid Dubey, Paael Lawyer fortiie State/raspondeiits 1, 2 and 4. ORAJ.ORDER (Passed on225rda^"oF]miuaiy, 2008) L Shri U.N^S.Deo, leamed G^^emm^nt coimsd appeariiig with Shri Diibey, Panel La.wyer for tie' State-respondent fairiy Btibmits tfoat -if a represeiitation is pendmg before the airthorities. the should be considered aBd'decided as eariy as possib.ie. whether m the order ofthe High Court, fh.e tJ.me has been specified or not« It is mcumbeiit ypon. the axrthorities to consider aed decide aiiy representati<m m accordmiee with law, as eariy as possible.. In this matter, fhe represeist-ation waa filed on 16.08.2007. Till date, fhe offieers have done notMng. If the represetrtatioii. has not been decided, fhe same be decided wtthia a period offoiir weeks from today. 2, Leanwd counsel appeariiig fbr the siibmite in vi@w ofAe fair arsd categorica! statement made by the leamed coiimel for the State- respondent^ nothmg sisrvives m this matter» ^.. ~f 3,, Accordiiigiy, tlw petition disposed of No as to coats, Amlt Sd/- SatishK.Agnibom Judge