IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35007 of 2008 SUNIL MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner’s name does not appear amongst the accused persons who are already named in the F.I.R. As may appear from the impugned order, there were some statements of the witnesses indicating the name of the petitioner as one of the dacoits. The contention is that the petitioner was known to the informant also on account of hailing from an adjoining village and has also been implicated because of some dispute of non- payment of wages. It is further contended that if at all the petitioner was identified, his name ought to have appeared in the F.I.R. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sakra P.S. case no.166 of 2000. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )