1 wp1112.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1112 OF 2011 Ganesh B. Doiphode. ....Petitioner Vs. The Incharge, Vishrambaug Police Station, Sangli & Anr. ....Respondents Mr. R.S.Alange, advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.P.Adsule, APP for State. CORAM:- P.V.HARDAS AND M.N.GILANI, JJ DATED:- APRIL 29, 2011 P.C. 1 Learned Counsel for the Petitioner very fairly states that the impugned order sealing the premises, of which the Petitioner seems to be owner was passed on 14/6/2010 and the authorities have sealed the premises for a period of one year, which would expire on 14/6/2011. In that learned Counsel for the Petitioner further very fairly states that the occupier of the premises had challenged the order of the authorities sealing the premises under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 in this 2 wp1112.11 court, which Petition came to be dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court. In that background, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this Petition with liberty of submitting representation to the Authorities after the period of sealing is over for handing over the possession of the property to the Petitioner being the owner of the premises. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner then prays for liberty of filing appropriate proceedings for challenge the order if adverse to the interest of the Petitioner, which may be passed by the Respondent on his representation. We further direct the respondent to decide the representation/application if submitted by the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 2 In that background, therefore, the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner for withdrawal of the Petition with liberty, as prayed for, is allowed. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for and with the direction afore-stated. (M.N.GILANI, J) (P.V.HARDAS, J)