'^g^ ^•^'i'^-^'"" ...••••""" s^-s^""" ^®"" BEFOREJ-ION'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO.^^6 1200S PETITIONER /• YASHWANT DEWAN aged about 55 years S/0. Shri Sewak Ram Dewan B.R.C.C. Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission Block Devetopment, Dhamtari Tah. & Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ : ^\. State of Chhattisgarh Through Principat Secretary School Education Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya D.K.S.Bhawan Road Raipur (C.G.) 2. Raiiv Gandhi EducationMission Through Djreclor/Collector Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission/ Project, Block Development Dhamtari (C.G.) ^3 District Education Offieer Dhamtari Tah.&Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) ~ WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 QE CONSTITUTIO^ItOEtNDtA •i K !l'':'. 'F h S' '^ ? i Xi;-HC-22 d-'xj •aiRiRPf.'^teffi?^ K«'ii*ili<: te,f.. (yo.4'llfe/ tliwil »t)ich'"""""""""""""'"""""'WI; 200 sn^i^T iti-li.* 311^?! *t|i<*'R^i S-12-2005 SKri V,G. Tatnaskar, eouiuel for ttje petitidher. SlniVivek Shamia, PaaelLawyer^ - HearA , ' Counsel for the petitiqner submit^ Coordinator. He fiirfher submits that or) Departmeht l)ut he has beeh sent on depu] ^T^lci4h ^nil?it ^ fe1^ '<f^'^i< ^; 3lfi;IH 311^1 . 'or t&e.State, on (idvance eopy.. Ifaat the petitioner is Block Resources Centte gnally he was workmg with School Education tation to Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Block Development Dhamtari. He fiirther sub^rits that his-deputation has not been caucelled but he has been transfen'ed by the..Dis(act Education .Qfficer, He submitfed that he submitted arepresentationon 9-9-2005 bu; HaviflgcOnsideredAndwithoute^ressmgaayopmionorithemerits offhecase, in the opimon of flus Court, ends of jusliee will 1»e serve^if a direetion is given to flie petitioner to make a detajled representatijin raising tus grievanees before fhe respondenfc no. 1 along with a copy ofthe getition ajid flus ordsr wiihin 15 days from foday and on sucli representation beirig.filed, the respcjndent No. 1 aha!l decide the same on its own merits in aeeordance wifh law as earty as jpossible preferably witlun two months &om the ! dafe ofreceipt ofthe representation. It 4 pefitionermay avail the remedy av'ailableutlder Iftelaw. Counsel further subfflits thatlhe aBowed to continue tifl the decision of tt'ie i (' . . • .'.... It is directed that if the petitionet contuuie tiB the representatiori is decided;. With the aforesaid observations, ty; , Consequentiy M.-W.P.No, 4856?{ disposedofc ' ' • ^ ,. • Certifi.edcopyasperrules. the same llas notvet beeh decided. made clear that if any grievanee remahis, tKe letitioner has not been relieved and he may be Spreseniation. - • hM not beea relieved, Me may be allowed fo s petition stands disposed of. ; 2005 and. I.A. No. 1Q114/2005 also stands .^ w ^h( sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^r's^ 'S" .</9;f •ff^