IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 11013 of 2010(B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- M.D.DHANESH, MANAGING PARTNER, CENTRAL GARDENS BAR HOTELS PVT.LTD., MILLINGAL JN.AMBALLOOR PANCHAYATH, POOTHOTTA ROAD, KANJIRAMITTOM. BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH SRI.M.RAJEEV SRI.T.V.VINU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PIRAVOM CIRCLE, PIRAVOM. 2. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJIRAMITTOM POLICE STATION, KANJIRAMITTOM. 3. JAYAPALAN PILLAI P.D., JANAKI NIVAS, KANJIRAMITTOM. 4. KERALA CHETHU MADHYA VYAVASAYA TOZHILALI CONGRESS (KTUC JACOB), REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.G.PURUSHOTHAMAN, KONNAM PARAMBIL, MEENPARA P.O., PUTHENKURISHU VIA., PIN 682308, ERNAKULAM DIST. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.11013 OF 2010 APPENDIX: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8.3.2010 GIVEN BY SMT.SANTHA APPACHAN TO THE HOTEL MANAGER. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF SUSPENSION ISSUED TO 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8.3.2010. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE STRIKE NOTICE DATED 24.3.2010 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE CHARGE MEMO DATED 27.3.2010 ISSUED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P5.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 27.3.2010 SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.11013 of 2010-B ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 19th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows: “to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order commanding the Ist and 2nd respondents to grant adequate and effective police protection to the petitioner, his staff and their property from 3rd and 4th respondents and their men.” 2. We have already passed and interim order in this matter after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader. The writ petition is disposed of making the interim order absolute. We make it clear that as a condition for the interim order being made absolute, the petitioner must co-operate with the conciliation proceedings. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS