Cp c/.V 1 "s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPLIRrCHHATnSGARH) WRTT PETmON HO^fy(ii/2QM PETmONER ^.-^? .<^ <%?;' RESPOt^bENTS ^^ ^' ^- Cr ::.^>^'" .-^w'" Bhanwar Lal Sahu S/o. Sri P.R.Sahu Ag^l about 50 years R/o. VjlJ. Supela, P.0. Sefwaaa, Tah - Kurud, Dist-Dhamtsri, C.G. VERSIIS 1) ThestateofChhattisgarh Through the secretary, Educatton Depar&nent, DJ<.S. Bhawan, RaipurC.G 2) Disfaict Education officer, Dhamtari District Dhamtari, C.G. ^^PFTmOM UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTirUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRFTS. DIRECTIONS AND/ORORDERS XI-HC-22 ^n^T^r f<rii<=h 3:ni?r 5^^|cr) tii^a ^ Vii ^ '3Fo5T ^I^IH^ ^Tl1^<l<o, ic«ni^<l< 3nt?T 'q^? W.^, Ko, ^<^/^-/^?o^ 'WHCfll 5bHlch^....,............................./..^^ 200 M "f^y' 3T7^?T'^TT^T ^rf^H 27-8-2004 On a mention being made, this case is i^ Petitioner/s by Shri ^, C r. Vc^y^ G. State by Shri V.V.S-. Murfchy, Dy. Ad^ and Shii Akhil Agrawal and Shii Sandeep Dube^j Heard. The matter relates to traiisfer ofthe peti.1|ioner from flie respecti.ve place. Counsel for the petitioner/s submitte<| effected fflegafly in contfWention oflaw.and poli) State coimsel submitted that the serving notice for demand ofjustice and represerj Having heard and considered ftie rival c| merits ofthe case, inthe opiriion.oftfais Court, to the petitioner/s to make detailed representati| the State Goveniment/oompetent authority ofth( this, order, within 10 days, and ori GovemmenVcompetent authority-.oftlie respond same on its own merits in accordance with law from the date of receipt/pmduction of fhe re^ giiidelmes is brouglit to tlie notice, fhe same be c< Coujisel for the petitioner/s prays tha grievance of the petitioner/s remains, he/she im the law. It is open to ttie petitionei' to avail ttie ren With fhe aforesaid observations, Consequently M.W.P., ifany, also stanc Certified copy as perrules. Copy to State coimsel for compliance. petiti|oner/s /^- ^QAf^y^ ^^'^. I? ^r^lr^ cbl^fd^1r1 'RTR^f ^ feT^t <f^<^i< '^^rf^R^TT^T kenup. . " ^dvQC<^l/ ' ocate General, ^dfh Shd Satish Gupta, Dy.G.A., Panel Lawyers. that fhe traiisfer of the petitioner/s has been ?y, State coimsel opposed it. has straightway filed the petition mfhout Itation. mtentions, without expressing any opinioii on the e|nds ofjustice wiU be senred ifa direction is given m raising lus/her grievances and groimds before 1respondents along with a copy ofthe petition and juch representation being filed, fhe State d^nts, under fhe law, shall consider and decida tiie |as early as possible preferably wifhin sbc weeks resentation. If any contraveiition of policy or tnsidered on its ovvn medte. after fhe dedsion of the representation if any ^ be allowed to avail fhe remedy available imder |edy available imder the law. tlus pet|tion staiids disposed of tdisposedof Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [Tft^ ^'fe^'