IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20820-2011 Date of Decision: 08.08.2011 Ankit and another . . .Petitioners Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This petition qua petitioner No.1 was not pressed on 28.07.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.2 had not caused any injury. This factum is admitted by the learned State Counsel on instructions received from ASI Ranbir Singh. Be that as it may, without making any observation on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed qua petitioner No.2. The petitioner No.2 is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. August 08, 2011. ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) vinod* Judge