THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD L.P.A.NO.277 OF 2001 JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao} The appellant is the owner of the vehicle, which was involved in the motor accident, against which claim was set forth and the same was acceded to by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Anantapur. During the appeal proceedings, the appellant sought to file an appeal along with an application seeking condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Learned Single Judge, by taking into account the long unexplained delay, for reason of the day-to-day and also the fact that the appellant himself did not appear before the Tribunal nor he contested the proceedings and no counter affidavit has been filed and no evidence has been adduced, did not show any indulgence in favour of the appellant and dismissed the same. Hence, the L.P.A. Having considered the submissions made and on perusal of the entire proceedings, it is seen that the appellant is totally silent and remained as silent spectator to the proceedings being the owner of the vehicle. Apparently, he has not contested the claim and after award is passed and compensation is fixed, without any pleading, much less any benefit whatsoever the nature, now sought to attack the same. In view of the same, we are in the entire agreement with the reasoning given by the learned Single Judge. No question of law, much less a substantial one arises in this appeal. Accordingly, the L.P.A. is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) __________________ (P.DURGA PRASAD, J) 31st January 2011 RRB