IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18013 of 2010 VEENA THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 4.11.2010 The main grievance of the petitioner being wife of the deceased–employee by name Taranand Thakur, who was an accountant in the department of respondent no.2, is that the respondents have not calculated and extended the benefits to her husband with effect from 1.1.1996 in the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000 instead of Rs.5000-8000 as fixed by the 5th Pay Commission as well as circular. It is further contended that son of the petitioner filed a representation in this regard on 7.1.2010 before the authority and thereafter petitioner also filed another representation on 24.6.2010. Hence, this present writ petition is filed. Learned G.P.-10 has contended that there is no representation earlier to the representation as stated above. Hence, the matter cannot be looked into. In view of the representations filed by the petitioner as stated above, it would be suffice if a direction is issued to the respondent-university to consider the representation and pass appropriate order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and this Court orders accordingly. With the aforesaid observation this writ petition is disposed of. Sudip (T. Meena Kumari, J.) 2