IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.604 of 2010 1. RAMESH MISTRI S/o late Dayanand Mistri 2. Kari Mistri S/o Sumit Mistri 3. Sushil Mistri S/o Kari Mistri 4. Anil Mistri S/o Kari Mistri Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Jaleshwar Mistri, S/o Bambholi Mistri, R/o Vill. Murli Bashantpur, P.S. Bangaon, District:Saharsa. ------ 2/ 27.04.2010 Heard both the parties. This revision application is filed against the order dated 09.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court NO. V, Saharsa in Cr. Appeal No. 07 of 2009 whereby and whereunder he has been pleased to uphold the Judgment and Order of conviction dated 20.04.2009 passed by Sri Rajiv Ranjan Sahay, J.M., IInd Class, Saharsa. Sentence is only pressed on the ground that parties are sharers having land dispute. Petitioners were first offenders. Two of the accused persons had any specific allegation. One Dayanand Mistri for causing assault on head is dead and another one is Kari Mistri but evidence is not constant for his responsibility rather victim Rajeshwar Mistri states about causing assault by means of rod by Sushil but that is not challenged even then petitioners are entitled for liberal view may be minimized to the period undergone. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the revision application is party allowed. Period of sentence is modified and minimized to the period undergone and the above named petitioners are directed to be 2 released forthwith, if not wanted in any other case. Rest of the Judgment and order dated 09.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Juge, Fast Track court No. V Saharsa in Cr. Appeal No. 07 of 2009 and the order dated 20.04.2009 passed by the J.M., IInd Class, Saharsa in Complaint Case No. 949C of 1999 corresponding to trial No. 31 of 2009 are hereby affirmed. If any of the petitioners has chance of getting Government service, it is observed that nature of the offence is not of moral turpitude. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)