IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 2898 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 17th March, 2011. Devender Mishra Petitioner through Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ashok Jindal, Advocate, for the applicants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that this writ petition may be disposed of by making the interim order dated 21.02.2011 absolute. Learned counsel for the applicants too has no objection provided that a fact finding inquiry is ordered to be held in a time- bound manner. In my considered view, no time-bound directions are required to be issued at this stage as firstly the Competent Authority has to form an opinion as to whether or not an inquiry needs to be held. The order dated 21.02.2011 is made absolute. Disposed of. Dasti. March 17, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE