:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 473, 593 & 474 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2004 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 473 OF 2010 Shri Liku Romu alias Rama Bhomkar & others ... Applicants V e r s u s State of Goa & Others ... Respondents WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 593 OF 2010 Shri Prakash Barkelo Madkaikar & Anr. ... Applicants V e r s u s State of Goa & others ... Respondents WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2010 Smt. Nirmala Laxman alias Madhukar Kelkar & anr. ... Applicants V e r s u s State of Goa & others .... Respondents Mr. S. N. Joshi, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the Respondent No.9. Mr. Sudin Usgoankar, Advocate for Respondent No.13. :2: Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Respondent No.14. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the Respondent No.8. Mr. J. Supekar, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.15 and 16. CORAM : D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. DATED : 14 th OCTOBER, 2010. P.C.: By these applications, the applicants pray for the payment of the amount of compensation falling to their shares. 2. By consent order ( minutes of order in invitum ) passed by the Court on 8th August, 2007, the respondents agreed and were directed to deposit in this Court a certain amount to be paid as a compensation for the alleged land or damage caused to the farmers on account of dumping activities carried out by the respondents' mining companies. By the said consent order, the Court ordered as follows : “(6)(d) The amount so deposited by the mining companies in this Court, shall be disbursed only to the respective occupants/owners for their respective areas towards crop loss and such disbursal shall be made by the Dy. Collector upon individual verification and identification and by following the normal procedure for disbursement of the amount including :3: receipts etc.” 3. The applicants have now made applications for payment of the compensation falling to their shares. It may be pointed that the payment is to be made only after the Dy. Collector has carried out an individual verification and identification. It appears that individual verification contemplated by the order has not been carried out. Learned Counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants will move the Dy. Collector for carrying out individual verification. We direct that if the applicants makes an application to the Dy. Collector for individual verification as directed by this Court in para 6(d) of the order dated 8th August, 2007, the Dy. Collector shall carry out the exercise. On such verification being carried out by the Dy. Collector, the applicants shall be entitled to move the Court again. 4. With the above directions, the applications are disposed of. D. G. KARNIK, J F. M. REIS, J at*