1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.461 /1995 (Tukaram Awate and another vs. Sudama Awate and another ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : 20th October, 2010. Heard Mr A.J.Thakkar, the learned counsel for the appellants. The learned counsel for the appellants has presented a pursis duly signed by the counsel for appellants dated 20.10.2010 in the Court today. The same is accepted on record and marked as Exh.”Z” for identification sake. In view of the statement made in the pursis, the appellants are permitted to delete the names of Respondents 2A and 2B from the array of respondents. The necessary amendment may be carried out forthwith. The parties to this appeal have filed a compromise petition in the Court. The same is signed by the appellants as well as the respondents to this appeal. The compromise petition is also singed by the counsel for the appellants and the counsel for respondents. The appellant no.2 Afzalkhan and the respondent no.1 & 2-C are personally present in the Court today. They have stated that they have signed the compromise pursis and the other appellants and 2 respondents have also signed the same. They have stated that they are ad-idem over the terms and the conditions mentioned in the compromise pursis. I have perused the contents of the compromise pursis. The terms of the compromise appear to be just and reasonable. The First Appeal is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis. Decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE sahare