IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 19277 of 1993 Between: N.D.Gandhi S/o.Raghavendra Rao, R/o.12-11-210, Warasiguda, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Secretary South Central Railway Employees Coop Credit Society Ltd, Secunderabad. 2. V.B.Nageswara Rao S/o.V.Ranga Rao S.C.Rly. Coop. Credit Society Ltd., Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein declaring the orders passed in impugned order No.S.O.O.No.35/93-94, Dt.1/12/1993 and confirming the proceedings No.CCS/14/10683, Dt.6/12/1993 as illegal, abinitio void by calling for records and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner M/s. D.S.R.KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr. V.VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr. J. LALITHA PRASAD. The Court Made the Following : ORDER In this writ petition the petitioner challenges the impugned order in S.O.O.No.35/93-94 dated 01.12.1993 and confirming the proceedings No.CCS/14/10683 dated 06.12.1993, whereby promotion to the petitioner was denied, while giving promotions to his juniors, as illegal and void. Heard both sides. It is brought to my notice that by virtue of the interim orders passed by this Court, promotion was given to the petitioner. The petitioner submits that the promotion was given without giving the other benefits only after passing of the interim orders by this Court and his juniors were promoted earlier. It is also submitted that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him has already lapsed in his favour as there being nothing on record against the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and taking into consideration the subsequent events, it is suffice to direct the 1st respondent herein to consider the case of the petitioner for giving all other benefits as is being given to his juniors, who were promoted earlier, and pass appropriate orders thereto. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ____________________ 2nd July 2004 BJ/Glv To 1. The Secretary South Central Railway Employees Coop Credit Society Ltd, Secunderabad. 2. Two C.D. copies.