S.B. CIVIL VAT REVISION NO.139/2007 A.C.T.O., Anti-Evasion-I Pali Vs. M/s. Alishan Petro Products Ltd. Date of Order :: 22nd May 2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.V.K.Mathur for the petitioner Office has placed the matter for orders with the report that notices of the sole respondent have been received unserved for want of fresh address. In this case, because of delay on the part of the petitioner in putting in the requisites, this Court passed the following order on 07.09.2007:- ''Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that requisites along with application for condonation of delay have been put-in. Office to check, and if requisites are found to have been put-in, delay in filing the same stands condoned, and let notices be issued and be given dasti. In case requisites are not found to have been put-in, as against the unserved respondents only, the revision petition shall automatically stand dismissed without reference to the Court. It will be open to the petitioner to get the notices served on as many addresses as the petitioner may find, however, if the notices are received unserved, the revision petition will stand dismissed without reference to the Court.'' (emphasis supplied) The notices sent to the respondent having been received unserved, no further orders are required because per the force of order dated 07.09.2007, this revision petition stands dismissed. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. MK