IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.1702-M of 2011 Date of Decision:19.1.2011 Sukhjeet Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.S. Baath, Advocate for the private respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 10 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Petitioners are present in the Court alongwith their counsel. Learned counsel for private respondents has put an appearance and states that the lady members of the family of the petitioners be allowed to meet the petitioners. The request is accepted. Accordingly, the mother and aunt of petitioner No.1 met her in the chamber. Mother and Aunt of petitioner No.2 were also allowed to meet petitioner No.2. However, the respondents are visibly unhappy with the said marriage. Accordingly, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Barnala, is Crl. M. No.1702-M of 2011 -2- directed to make sure that the petitioners are not physically harmed in any manner and take necessary measures in accordance with law, if threat perception still exists. 19.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE