IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1183 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29.10.1999 in W.P.NO: 597 OF 1999 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. A.P.S.E.B. (Now A.P.Genco) rep. By its Member Secretary, Vidyut Sudha, Hyderabad. 2. Superintending Engineer, O & M Circle, L.S.H.E. Scheme, A.P. Genco, Mothudgudem, Khammam District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1. B. Lakshmana Rao, S/o. Danayya 2. S. Papa Rao, S/o. Ramulu, 3. S.Kurma Rao, S/o. late Rajulu, 4. S. Moinudding Khader, S/o. S.A. Rajak, (address of the respondents is, Masid Lane, Upper Sileru, Khammam District.) .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: SMT.K.SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondents: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) None appears for the appellant. This Intra Court appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is directed against the order dated 29.10.1999 passed in W.P.No.597 of 1999 by the learned Single Judge, as he then was, allowing the writ petition ﬁled by the respondents/petitioners directing the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioners for absorption, in the light of the conditions stipulated in B.P.Ms.No.37 dated 18.05.1997 within the time frame of four months. Pending the writ appeal the appellants/respondents failed to obtain stay of implementation of the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. In the absence of any stay, the appellants/respondents are bound to consider the case of the respondents/writ petitioners in the light of the directions issued by this Court. Learned counsel for the respondents/writ petitioners is also not in a position to apprise about the consideration of the case in the light of the conditions stipulated in B.P.ms.No.37 dated 18.05.1997. In all probability, the appellants might have considered the case of the respondents/writ petitioners for absorption. In view of the same, no cause survives in this appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. ​___________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY,J) _________________________ (VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J) 4th September, 2008 Js. ………………. REGISTRAR To 1 The Sponge Iron India Limited Rep by its Director, Finance, Paloncha, Khammam District, 2 2 CD copies