1 chs1212-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Chamber Summons No.1212 of 2010 in Suit No.4183 of 1998 Smt. Rekha Shriman Shrimankar .. Plaintiff v/s. Smt.Manjulaben I Shrimankar & Ors. ..Defendants Mr.P.J.Thorat for the Plaintiff. Mr.Dinesh Purandare with Shaikh Yusuf Ali i/b. Akshay Vani for the Applicant in the Chamber Summons Mr.Vibhute i/b.Khaitan & Jaykar for the Defendant No.2 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 28th September , 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel on both sides. The Chamber Summons is taken out by M/s. Spice Irelands Apparels Ltd. and M/s. Bhupco Alloys Ltd., which are two different entities. In the cause title of this Chamber Summons two companies are shown as respondents. In fact, they should have been shown as applicants. The Counsel appearing on behalf of these two companies state that two different premises are concerned in the present chamber summons. One is for 2 chs1212-10.sxw and on behalf of M/s. Spice Ireland Apparels Ltd., which is appointed as agent in respect of one premises and another is on behalf of M/s. Bhupco Alloys Ltd. who is appointed as Agent of the Receiver in record to that premises. 2. If two premises are involved, then two separate chamber summons are required to be filed so that the matter can be considered with reference to each of the premises separately. In view of this, Chamber Summons is disposed of with no order, with liberty to the aforesaid companies to take out separate chamber summons. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Fresh chamber summons would be considered on merits and disposal of this chamber summon would not come in the way. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]