IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 623 of 2011 Date of Decision: April 05, 2011 A.M. Mahajan …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Advocate for the appellant 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 17.09.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that the writ petitioner-appellant was entitled to leave encashment alongwith interest @ 9% per annum. The matter is similar to the one decided by this Court in LPA No. 593 of 2011 decided on 28.03.2011, where the appeal filed by the writ petitioner-appellant Inder Singh Jain has since been dismissed upholding the impugned judgment. The aforesaid fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (T.P.S. MANN) JUDGE April 5, 2011 Atul