1 wp10221.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10221 OF 2009 Sahebrao Subhedar Khengare (since deceased by heirs) 1a Mahadev Sahebrao Khengare & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. Ravindra Sahebrao Pilane & Ors. ...Respondents Ms A.R.S.Baxi for the petitioners None for the respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 P.C. 1 By the impugned order passed by the State Government, the order of Additional Collector in Appeal of confirming M.E.Nos.35 and 36 has been restored. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the sale deeds on the basis of which mutation entries were ordered to be effected have been challenged in the substantive suit pending in the Civil Court and therefore, impugned order is illegal. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner cannot be acceded to. The mutation entries have been allowed to be effected on the basis of the registered sale deeds. Merely because mutation entries are made on the basis of the sale deeds, the issue of validity of the sale deeds is not decided Impugned order specifically records that the same is passed subject to final outcome of the civil suit. The orders passed by the authorities in the mutation entry proceedings under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 are not binding on the Civil Courts in title suits. 2 wp10221.sxw 2 Subject to what is observed above, no case for inference is made out. Writ Petition is rejected. JUDGE