IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4884 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.8.2011 Chetna Latwal ......Petitioner(s) Versus Dr. Jotinder Kaur Mander ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) As per the averments, the respondent had filed an eviction petition under Section 13-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 against the petitioner in which leave to defend was declined to the petitioner vide order dated 6.6.2011. Before the Rent Controller, the petitioner had admitted the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. In this revision petition, the petitioner has prayed that he be allowed to withdraw the aforesaid admission made before the Rent Controller in her affidavit dated 20.9.2010. It has been also averred that the said admission was made under a bona fide mistake. Be that as it may, the petitioner did not make any such request before the Rent Controller before whom the alleged admission was made. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the present petition seeking the said relief is not maintainable. Dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to seek an appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. August 12, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE