IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11321 of 2010 MUNNA SINGH @ SHAILENDRA SINGH, S/o Upendra Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 15.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 436, 307, 452 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was initially granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad by order dated 19.06.1996 but the same was cancelled by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad by order dated 23.12.1996. The petitioner came before this Court for quashing of the said order and the matter was stayed till it was finally dismissed on 25.07.2000. Thereafter, it was brought to the notice of the Court by the informant by a petition dated 20.04.2009 that the matter had been dismissed by the High Court so the warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner on 18.12.2009 in pursuant to which he surrendered on 16.01.2010. The petitioner is named - 2 - in the First Information Report being one of the 31 persons who participated in the occurrence. In view of the fact that the matter is of the year 1996 and warrants were issued against the petitioner only in 2009, let the petitioner above named who has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 53 of 1996 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be - 3 - cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)