IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-32837 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.12.2009. Jagtar Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Arshvinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Gurjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2. S. D. ANAND, J. The plea for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners in complaint case titled Pardeep Kumar Vs. Jagtar Singh and another under Sections 302, 201, 148, 149, 120-B IPC deserves to be granted. The reasons therefor are as under:- The matter was enquired into by D.S.P.(D), Batala who did not uphold the accountability of the petitioners. Copy of the report is available on record as Annexure P-2. Thereafter, respondent no.2 had made a complaint in the context against the petitioners. It was enquired into by the DSP(City), Batala, who vide his enquiry report dated 11.4.2008 (Annexure P-3), reiterated the finding recorded in Annexure P-2 by DSP (D), Batala. Yet another enquiry report dated 14.5.2008 DSP, Headquarter, Batala, also does not indict the petitioner. Copy of the report is available on record as (Annexure P-4). Without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. Disposed of accordingly. December 15, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE