: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.129 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1905 OF 2007 Sindhu Shankar Kamble .. Petitioner V/s. The President, Kodoli Vibhag Shikshan Sangh, Kodoli, Tal. Panhala & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Suresh S. Pakale for the Petitioner. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 4 TH DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The Contempt Petition has been filed contending that there is a breach of the order dated 20th April, 2007. This Contempt Petition has been filed on 18th February, 2009. Whether the Contempt Petition is maintainable in view of the fact that it has been filed after one year or not is not a matter with which I am concerned today. 2. The order dated 20th April, 2007, which the petitioner claims has been breached, only admits the Writ Petition and interim relief staying the : 2 : order of the School Tribunal has been granted on condition that the respondent No.1 reinstates the petitioner and pays her 50% of the back wages within eight weeks from the date of the order. According to the petitioner, this direction of reinstatement and paying her 50% of back wages has not been complied with. 3. In my opinion, merely because this direction has not been complied with, it cannot be considered to be a contempt of Court. It only means that there is no interim stay operative today. The petitioner can, therefore, take recourse to remedies available to her in accordance with law. 4. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. 5. The notice stands discharged. .......