IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6992 of 2009 JAINENDRA KUMAR JAIN,SON OF LATE GANESH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BRAHMASTHAN, P.O.RUKHAI, P.S. CHANDI, DISTRICT NALANDA AT PRESENT ABC BOOK CENTRE, BUDH NATH ROAD, PATNA, DISTRICT PATNA. ---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, PATNA. 4. THE HEADMASTER, J.D. GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, ADALATGANJ, PATNA. ---RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 23.6.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that although dues towards provident fund has been sanctioned calculating the interest at the rate of 10.5%, but in terms of the Government resolution, as contained in Memo No.4193 dated 13th of July, 1985 (Annexure 2), the interest towards the provident fund dues ought to have been paid at the rate of 12.5%. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious redressal of the grievance, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation along with the relevant documents before the Director, General Provident Fund, Bihar, Patna (respondent no.3) within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of 2 such representation. Upon consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, respondent no.2 shall issue further necessary orders, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be settled without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)