1 S.B.Cr.Misc. II Bail App. No. 1391/2008 (Bhajna Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 28/03/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Rakesh Matoria, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. This is second bail application. While dismissing the earlier bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh bail application after filing of challan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the police has concluded the investigation and challan has been filed. Learned counsel further submits that even in the FIR it has been stated that a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- was given to the petitioner but at the same time, the petitioner has given the same to accused No.2 and 3 mentioned in the FIR and thus the money has gone to the hands of accused No.2 and 3 in the presence of the complainant and they were liable for sending the complainant abroad. Be that as it may, having regard to the facts and circumstances and having considered the oral arguments advanced by counsel for the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Bhajna Ram S/o Shri Swaran Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 482/2007 P.S. Raisinghnagar, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the 2 satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP