1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4821 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Pratap Patil for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 2ND JULY 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition is directed against an interlocutory order and hence I am not inclined to entertain the petition. Even otherwise, I am satisfied that the impugned order requires no interference. The learned Trial Judge has rejected the petitioner’s application for appointment of a Court Commissioner on the ground that the Court Commissioner cannot be appointed for collecting the evidence. The 2 approach is a proper approach and requires no interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is accordingly rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)