1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7927 OF 2008 Nana P. Patil. ...Petitioner. vs. 1.The Union of India & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.E.A.Sasi, for Petitioner. Mr.Arjun H.Patil, for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 7th November,2009 P.C.:- 1. The Central Administrative Tribunal has declined to entertain the petition as barred by law of limitation. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner at length. We find that the Tribunal has given cogent reasons for declining to 2 condone the delay. The Tribunal has also considered the case on merit. We see no reasons to interfere with. Hence, the petition is rejected. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)