•^- a.' <•^ Ct) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No:^GO^ /2011 FETITIONER ^^y. .vpf^> .....•••\:^'-%>'^^ ^^^?2^r"' ^ RESPONDENTS Kamal Narayan Bhardwaj S/o Shri Daras Ram Bhardwaj aged about 45 Years, Lecturer, presently working at Govt. Higher Secondary School Tuman, Block- Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) VBRSUS ^_/ . - _... 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2.' Assistant Commissioner, Tnbal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) , Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School Tuman, Block- Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) 4. Joint Director, Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 XI-HC—78 WH<ff Vhwati ^°E[ ^l^llrt-4, ®Ti1<-i'is,fs|di<-iy,< . U-P-ca-) <\L- >4<-ty sn^i TraqT ('ipf^ai^q) sn^v w l<-fi<* ^TSff STT^T sti*i ^giw ^fer w^i ^>l<4ici<ft'1 ^\fiv^ ^f f^%t if^l^K ^siRman^r <' r>' >•»•; Shri Ashwini Shukla, coiin^el for fhe petitioner. Shri A.V.ShrifUiar, P.L. for 1|he State. Couasel for fhe petitioner ^ubmits that fhe petitioaer is entifled to benefit of two advaacej havingpassed B.Ed. exaiaination| own cost. It is submitted fhat thd letition is no longer res inteora a|nd fhe saine has been finallv decided by fhe Hon'ble Suprem' Saxena Vs. State of M.P. 8s Ors. Utt It is further subinitted tba similar view in its order dated 6. 6257/2008. Counsel for the order dated 29..4.2010 passed whereni relying upon the judgua.| fhe case of Asha Saxeaa (supra) Court ia anoflier Writ Appeal f\ been issued for consideration advance increments as per the State of Madhya pleaded in the pctition, 4f ciTcular increinents on account of he before his appointment at his issue involved iu ttie present petit|oner Court in fhe case of Asha |2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. fhis Court has also taken a J2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. furflier subinits that fhe Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, ;nt of the Supreine Court iu |aad fh.e order passed by fhis [o. 87/2009, directions have fhe case for grant of two dated 21.9.1974 issued bv hfter verification of the facts Coiinsel for fhe State subiAits fhat case of fhe petitioner would atso be considered on fhe ^ame lines. ^ XI-HC—78 TST ^l'illc'i'f, ®tily4i<o,fsi<niyy,< NiHcti *»irai sn^l 'tpRr ('yij'i'^i) sn^r^ifyTRT ^ran sn^T^irfRi' TOtwafta w^i ^i^l(d<4"IT1 'tTm^E ^f 'fet?t <Fi|-t^K ^iaffinan^i <-. •:T in view of above, the pe|tition is disposed of with a direction to fhe petitioner to before the coiupetent aufhority ^ni any such representation, the| consider the same i& accordanlse appropriate ordcr. d ia the eventuality of fi1m^ corapetent aufhorily shall wifh law and would pass It is inade clear that fhis opinion on nierits of the case would be at Kberty to decide the [Court has not expressed any |and fb.e authority concemed iame ia accordance with law. r~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotiri Judge