IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2011 / 6TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17221 of 2011(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. MIDHUNDAS, AGED 21, PAVITHRAM HOUSE, BEYPORE P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. JAWHAR, AGED 21, 'LAVANYA', VADAKKENANNA P.O., KODUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. BASIL P.V., AGED 22, POOKOTPARAMBA HOUSE, MARIKKUNNU P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 4. FASHITH, AGED 21, KODUVATH VEEDU, PAYYANAKKAL P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.S.K.SAJU, SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI. O.V. RADHAKRISHNAN, SC,UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.17221/2011 C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1:(A):COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. P1(B):COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. P1(C): COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 3RD PETITIONER. P1(D): COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION/SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE CHALLAN RECEIPT OF THE 4TH PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 17221 OF 2011-C ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are studying their B.B.A. Course. They appeared for the third year examinations during January, 2011. When the result of the said examination was declared, they failed in paper, Quantitative Technique. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 10 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rka