IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35158 of 2010 NARENDRA SAO @ NARENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE DR. NILKANTH PRASAD……………………………………. PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.11.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In course of IPL cricket match show there appeared some technical defect in screening, which was taken seriously by people. There was violence and there was stone pelting also, in that course it is alleged that informant’s son was caught by this petitioner, his Manager and Guard and assaulted by petitioner’s son by means of rod on head which injury is opined grievous by the doctor; now is taken seriously by the learned counsel for the informant. But submission is that petitioner is not the real assailant and violence was not committed on behalf of accused persons rather petitioner’s cinema hall was damaged and stone pelting was committed by people resulting into injury to informant’s son. Specifically it is said that in the above circumstance, when petitioner has not been shown assailant of the victim boy he is entitled for anticipatory bail. I agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (T) P.S. Case No.172/2010, subject to the 2 conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash ( Mandhata Singh, J.)