IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.1064 OF 2009 Between: Md. Omer Khan, S/o. Late Md. Bahadur Khan …Petitioner – accused No.6 AND Smt. Malti Singh & another .....Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.1064 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner Md. Omer Khan, accused No.6, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C. No.286 of 2008 on the file of IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad arising out of Crime No.182 of 2008 of Narayanaguda Police, Station, Hyderabad registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 387 and 506 IPC. 2. Heard. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is of his trying along with the other accused to grab the land of the de facto complainant. 4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was with the other accused as a dispute with regard to his land was to be resolved and that it was decided that after the transaction with regard to the de facto complainant’s land is completed, they (other accused) would resolve the dispute of the petitioner’s land. Thus, petitioner was accidentally found with the other accused and that he was not actually involved in the offence. 5. All these things, which are questions of facts, could be decided during trial and there is no dispute about the presence of the petitioner at the place of offence. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of offence, which pertains to grabbing of the land of innocent people, it is not at all a fit case for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner. 7. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J October 22, 2009. PV