IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 1637 of 2009 Between: Mohammedi Begum @ Sana, W/o. Syed Basheer Ahmed, R/o. H.No. 20-3-1132, Shahgunj, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Cyberabad. 3 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, L.B. Nagar, Cyberabad. 4 The Inspector of Police, Police Station Saroor Nagar, Cyberabad. 5 Satyanarayana, D.S.I. Saroor Nagar Police Station, Cyberabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly Writ of Habeas Corpus for production and released of petitioners husband Syed Basheer Ahmed and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOHD.MUZAFFER ULLAH KHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 1637 OF 2009 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) By means of filing this writ petition Under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks for issuance of writ of habeas corpus for releasing of her husband Syed Basheer Ahmed alleging that he has been illegally detained by the respondent-police. The counter affidavit filed by the Inspector of Police, Saroornagar Police Station-4th respondent herein discloses that the alleged detenu is an accused in Crime No.92 of 2009 and 104 of 2009 and in that connection, he was arrested and produced before the Magistrate and later on, he was released on bail. Now, the learned counsel for the petitioner accepting the contents of the affidavit filed by the 4th respondent, submits that no further cause survives in the writ petition. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) _______________ (B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J.) FEBRUARY 12, 2009 TSR