IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.165 of 2009 1. OM PRAKASH SINGH 2. HRIDYA NAND SINGH 3. SAKALA DEVA DEVI 4. JAGNNATH SINGH 5. KAPILDEO SINGH 6. WAKIL SINGH @ AJIT KUMAR SINGH …PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI RAM CHAUDHARY …OPPOSITE PARTIES For the petitioners :Mr.Rajni kant Singh For the State :Mr.Permeshwar Dayal,APP ---------- 2. 17.09.2010 Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2008, whereby their application seeking discharge has been considered and rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners questions the sustainability of the order on diverse counts. Learned counsel states that on 17.10.08 a compromise was arrived at between the parties on which the victim and accused persons have put their signatures. It is thus contended that in view of compromise so arrived at between the parties the present order should be interfered with and quashed. I am afraid on these counts the order impugned which is otherwise based on materials on record can be interfered with and quashed. However, this Court grants opportunity to the petitioners to take the aforesaid ground in the court below by filing appropriate application which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 2 With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )