( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 539 OF 2009 Ajay s/o Achhutrao Pawal PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. Sachin Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioners. Smt. R.D. Reddy, A.P.P. for respondent No.1/State. Mr. Ankush G. Shinde, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, advocate for respondent No.2. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 29th July, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned APP Smt. Reddy states that the FIR lodged by the respondent No. 2 was investigated into and the Investigating Officer has come to the conclusion that no case is made out to file chargesheet against the petitioner and, therefore, no criminal action is being ( 2 ) taken against the petitioner in respect of the said F.I.R. In view of such statement, the writ petition is disposed of as relief of quashing of the F.I.R. is not required. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/CRIWP539-09