IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2011 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2806 of 2011() -------------------------------- CRIME NO.120/2011 of CHERUTHURUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR PETITIONERS:- ------------------ 1. MUHAMMED S/O.ABDU. 2. HASSAN S/O.ABDU. 3. FAIZAL S/O.MUHAMMED. 4. SULEKHA W/O.MUHAMMED. 5. SALEENA D/O.MUHAMMED. ALL RESIDING AT MUKKADAKATTIL HOUSE, KONDOORKARA POST, PATTAMBI, OTTAPALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMI SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENT:- --------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE (SHO), CHERUTHURUTHY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI. M.S. BREEZE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ============================ Bail Application No. 2806 of 2011 ============================ Dated this the 12 th day of April, 2011. ORDER In this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., petitioners who are the accused in Crime No.120 of 2011 of Cheruthuruthy Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 341, 323 and 506(i) r/w Section 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor, after instructions, submitted that the surviving offences are only those punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323 and 506(i) r/w Section 149 I.P.C which are bailable offences. If so, invocation of Section 438 Cr.P.C. is misconceived. This Petition is accordingly dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to seek regular bail either from the Magistrate or the arresting police officer concerned. Dated this the 12th day of April, 2011. sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv //True Copy// P.A to Judge.