(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 11036 OF 2010 Yashodabai w/o. Ratanlal Bansile, Age : 77 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Village Deulgaon Raja, Taluka : Deulgaon Raja, .. Petitioner District : Buldhana. (Original plaintiff) versus Radheshyam s/o. Ramnath Kabra, Age : 57 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Village Tembhurni, Taluka : Jafrabad, .. Respondent District : Jalna. (Original defendant) ....................... Mr. Rajendra S. Deshmukh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Y.G. Somani, Advocate, for the respondent. ........................ (2) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 24TH JANUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The documents shown to the defendant during his cross examination are sought to be exhibited. 3. Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, states that the documents are public documents and though the witness has denied the same, the documents needed to be exhibited. 4. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly states that the documents were not already on record and were shown to the witness during his cross examination. He further states that recording of evidence of the plaintiff is already over. 5. As the documents were not on record and have been shown to witness of the defendant during his cross examination, it is apparent that when he denied the documents, same could not (3) have been exhibited. 6. With liberty to the petitioner, to raise contentions as would be open in law, in relation to the said documents, before the trial court, the petition is disposed of. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp11036