IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12862 of 2000 RAM CHHAPIT RAM @ RAM CHHAPIT KUMHAR & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 12.08.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 20.12.1999 passed by the Collector, Bhojpur in Revenue Misc. Case No. 33 of 1998-99, Annexure-13, whereunder he has dismissed the petition filed by petitioner no.1 praying inter alia to settle 3 decimals of land in Plot No. 3532 in his favour on the ground that he was in possession of 3 decimals of land in the said plot but ignoring his possession over 3 decimal the Circle Officer erroneously settled only 2 decimals of land with him under order dated 5.6.1998, Annexure-12. 3. From the order of the Collector, Bhojpur dated 20.12.1999, Annexure-13 it appears that the settlement has been made on the basis of the actual possession of petitioner no.1 over 2 decimals of land but such statement of fact in the order of the Collector has been disputed by the counsel for the petitioners as according to him the report submitted on the basis of actual possession of the lands in-question in favour of different persons interpolations were made which was not noticed by the authorities, namely, Circle Officer and the Collector. 4. The aforesaid aspects of the matter are not required to be looked into by the writ court, as such, petitioners are at liberty to approach the Collector, Bhojpur at Ara to seek a review of his order dated 20.12.1999, Annexure-13 on the basis of their actual possession of the lands in-question. If such review application is filed by the petitioners before the Collector, Bhojpur at Ara, the same be considered in accordance with law after condoning the delay in filing the same. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)