IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 32611 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BITTU.B.JOSEPH, AGED 23 YEARS, SON OF BABU JOSEPH, ROSE VILLA, KATHRUKADAVU, COCHIN-682 017. BY ADV. SRI.A.V.THOMAS SRI.JOJO GEORGE SRI.NIDHI SAM JOHNS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE M.G.UNIVESITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, M.G.UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. BY SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J ------------------- W.P.(C).32611/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Heard Sri.A.V.Thomas, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and and Sri.T.A.Shaji, the learned counsel appearing for the Mahatma Gandhi University. 2. The petitioner appeared for the fourth and sixth semester B.Tech Degree Examinations in “Information Technology” conducted by the Mahatma Gandhi University in May-June, 2009. The results were published in August, 2009. The petitioner failed in one paper of the sixth semester examination and two papers of the fourth semester examination. He therefore applied for revaluation of his answer scripts by submitting Exts.P1 and P2 applications dated 29.9.2009. The petitioner submits that he has completed his course of study, that he had done well in the examinations and that he is sure to secure a pass if his answer scripts are revalued. It is submitted that he has to appear for the Common Admission Test for admission to the MBA course scheduled to be held on 6.12.2009 at Chennai. He also submits that if, after revaluation he does not secure a W.P.(C).32611/2009 2 pass, he can appear for the supplementary examination scheduled to be held in December, 2009. 3. Sri.T.A.Shaji, the learned counsel appearing for the Mahatma Gandhi University submits that if Exts.P1 and P2 applications are in order and the requisite fee has been paid, the University will take steps to revalue the petitioner's answer scripts and to communicate the results to him expeditiously. In the light of the said submission, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioner's answer scripts described in Exts.P1 and P2 applications revalued and to communicate results to him on or before 31.12.2009. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge mrcs