IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2009 / 15TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6150 of 2009(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- ANILKUMAR.R., JAYALAKSHMI TRADERS, P.P.IV/183, KOTHKULANGARA, PANAYAMUTTOM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SMT.K.HYMAVATHY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KVAT, NEDUMANGAD. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 6150 OF 2009 K -------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th March, 2009 JUDGMENT The Registration Certificates of the petitioner under the KVAT Act and CST Act were cancelled by Ext.P1. Ext.P2 is the appellate order by which the Appellate Authority directed the assessing authority to give the petitioner sufficient opportunity to present his case with documents and evidence and consider the objections filed by the petitioner after giving copy of the Enquiry Report and to pass orders according to law. According to petitioner, he submitted Exts.P3 and P4. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the petitioner did not file objection and also no material was produced and what is more, an order has already been passed on 09.02.2009. In such circumstances, leaving open all the contentions of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to WPC.6150/09 K 2 communicate the decision taken on 09.02.2009 to the petitioner within a period of one week from today. I leave it open to the petitioner to challenge the same, if it is adverse to him. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge