( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1889 OF 200 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1889 OF 200 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1889 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.468 OF 2007 IN TEST.PETITION NO.272 OF 2004 Mr.Samith Balu Kamble .. Appellant V/s Mahesh Madhukar Gaikwad .. Respondent Mr.S.B.Amin the Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATE : 21st November, 2007. DATE : 21st November, 2007. DATE : 21st November, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respodnent though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. 2. By this Notice of Motion the Appellant is seeking condonation of 92 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)