1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1954 OF 2009 IN CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3492 OF 2004 Mrs. Swati Dey ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Sandesh Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, A.G.P for Respondent Nos.1 & 5 CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. Dated : 18TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard Mr. Deshpande, learned Counsel for the applicant. Mr. Rayrikar appears for Respondents 1 and 5. 2.This application for restoration has been filed belatedly and as per the office note it is filed beyond time by 4 years and 219 days. No separate affidavit or application has been filed to explain the reasons for condonation of delay. We are, therefore, not inclined to condone the delay and entertain this 2 Application for restoration. Hence, the Application is rejected. 3.However, if the applicant submits a representation to Respondent No.5 regarding his grievance for non-payment of the salary in the prescribed pay scale within a period of 4 weeks from today, the representation shall be considered by the Respondent No.5, and the said Officer shall take appropriate steps for the redressal of the applicant s grievance. 4.The Respondent No.5 shall submit a report to the Registrar of this Court through the learned A.G.P about the action taken on such a representation. [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]