IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2661 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.5.2009 Naranjan Singh ....Petitioner Versus Mukhtiar Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for the petitioenr. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned Court below whereby the petitioner has been directed to remove Gobar Gas Plant Pipes from Khasra No. 73//1/31 and the Field Kanungo has been directed to be present at the spot as there was apprehension of fight. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the property in dispute is in joint ownership of the parties. It is yet to be partitioned. Further it is a fact that the aforesaid Gobar Gas Plant Pipes are located in a passage. Accordingly, the same should not be directed to be removed till such time the property is partitioned by meets and bounds. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any merit in the submissions made. Admittedly, there is a decree of Civil Court against the petitioner specifically directing him to remove Gobar Gas Plant Pipes laid by him in Khasra No. 73//1/31. Once that is so, the Executing Court could not go behind the decree to hold that the petitioner may not remove the pipes considering the fact that it was a joint property or the pipes were located in the passage. No illegality as such is found in the impugned order. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 11.5.2009 JUDGE Reema