C.W.P No. 10485 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 10485 of 2008 Date of decision : May 04, 2009 Ms. Munesh ...... Petitioner (s) v. State of Haryana and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. J.S.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J The petitioner has challenged the action of the official respondents in awarding her 9 marks out of 20 for Parade in the test for admission to BI course. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner had qualified in the written test and had stood first in the endurance race of 1500 meters and that she had also stood first in the Parade held in the year 2003. He has further argued that 9 marks were given only to render the petitioner unsuitable. C.W.P No. 10485 of 2008 ::2:: It may be noticed here that there are no allegations of mala fide against the selection committee consisting of the SP and the DSP of the District and another DSP from outside the District. In my opinion, the question posed in this writ petition is primarily one of fact viz whether Parade of the petitioner on the date of the test was of a high enough standard which could enable her to make the cut or not. This Court is not in a position to either appreciate or opine on this factual aspect. The mere fact that five years ago, the petitioner stood first in the Parade would not lead to an irresistible conclusion that her Parade test in 2008 also went equally well. In these circumstances, finding no merit in this writ petition, the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) May 04, 2009. JUDGE `kk'