30 % 26.05.2011 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Adv. for the petitioners along with petitioners in person. Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. for respondent nos. 2 and 3. + Crl. M.A. No. 6417/2011 in Crl. M.C. No. 3039/2007 * By way of this application it has been prayed that FIR No. 230/2007 under Sections 420/468/471 IPC registered at Rajinder Nagar be quashed. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 had filed a complaint under Sections 442/443/445/448/380/420/464/465/468/471/34/ 120-B in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi against the petitioners. Later, complaint was assigned to Metropolitan Magistrate for disposal in accordance with law. An application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was also filed along with the complaint which was disposed of by the Metropolitan Magistrate vide order dated 15th September, 2007, with the directions to Station House Officer of Police Station Rajinder Nagar to register FIR and investigate the matter. Aggrieved by the said order petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of the order dated 15th September, 2007 as well as the complaint case no. 55/01. During the pendency of the petition FIR No. 230 / 2007 under Sections 420 / 468 / 4 71 IPC has been registered Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified at Police Station Rajinder Nagar. It appears that the complai;}---) and the FIR are nothing but offshoot of disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos.2 and 3 regarding property bearing no. 26/9, Old Rajinder Nagar, Market Lane, New Delhi. It may be noticed here that civil suit is also pending between the parties over this property. Now, both the parties have settled their disputes amicably. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the Memorandum of Understanding dated 13th May, 2011. Both the parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. Respondent nos. 2 and 3, who are present in Court, have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. Keeping in mind that both the parties have settled their disputes amicably, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served 1n keeping the criminal proceedings pending. -.. o · Accordingly, in the larger interest, FIR No. 230/2007 under Sections 420 / 468 / 4 71 IPC registered at police station Rajinder Nagar and consequent proceedings are quashed. Application and the main petition are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. May 26, 2011 ga l