WPMS No. 2028 of 2008 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 and 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 11.11.2008, issued by respondent no. 2 (copy of annexure 7A to the writ petition) and notice of sale dated 11.11.2008, issued by said respondent (copy annexure 8 to the writ petition). Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent- Finance Corporation (H.D.F.C). It is also not disputed that he has committed as many as seven defaults in the payment of loan. Perusal of the annexures filed to the writ petition shows that the demand notices were issued to the petitioner from time to time and finally the respondents resorted to the proceedings under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Ultimately, when the petitioner did not repay the loan and did not reply to the notice, the notice of possession was issued and possession of the house was taken by the respondents. Since, the petitioner has committed the admitted default in repayment of the loan and proceedings initiated by the respondent- authorities are in pursuance of the provisions of the aforesaid Act, this Court does not find violation of any right of the petitioner, which requires interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily. (P.C.P., J.) 25.11.2008 NS