IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 2824 of 2010. Date of Decision : February 17, 2010. H/Cap. Parma Nand and others ...... Petitioners. Versus. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner for the States of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, and Union Territory of Chandigarh, and another. ..... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH. Present:- Mr. Gagan Pradeep S. Bal, Advocate, for the petitioners. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL). Counsel for the petitioners contends that for the claim, which has been made by the petitioners in the present writ petition, they have already preferred the representations, which have been appended as Annexure-P-5 to Annexure-P-7, which are dated 25.09.2009, 01.09.2009, and 18. 12.2009 respectively. He states that the petitioners would be satisfied, if a direction be issued at this stage to respondent No. 1 to consider the same within some specified time. Without going into merits of the case nor commenting thereon, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to consider and decide the representations, i.e., Annexure-P-5 to Annexure-P-7, which are dated 25.09.2009, 01.09.2009, and 18. 12.2009 respectively, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The copy of the decision be conveyed to the petitioners forthwith. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE February 17, 2010. sjks.