IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2011 / 25TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26163 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. NANDU.S. (MINOR), AGED 17 YEARS, S/O.LATE SARASAN, THUNDUVILA VEEDU, KULATHOOR KONAM, PUTHENKULAM.P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRONT SMT.SUTHI AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.LATE SARASAN, THUNDUVILA VEEDU, KULATHOOR KONAM, PUTHENKULAM.P.O.,KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SUTHI, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.LATE SARASAN, THUNDUVILA VEEDU, KULATHOOR KONAM, PUTHENKULAM.P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EDUCATIONS, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 4. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, U.K.F.COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, MEENAMBALAM, PUTHANKULAM.P.O., VIA PARIPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.689 001. GP SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH SC M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26163 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE ADMISSION CARD DATED 29.8.2011 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE PAYMENTS SHOWING THE ABOVE PAYMENT ISSUED BY STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, KALLAMBALAM BRANCH DATED 1.9.2011. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 5.9.2011. EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE CANDIDATE DATA SHEET ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH THE PETITIONER ON 17.5.2011. EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PROSPECTUS FOR THE YEAR 2011 PUBLISHED by the 2ND RESPONDENT. (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).26163/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 17th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Complaining that despite his eligibility, the first petitioner has been denied admission in the Engineering Colleges, the writ petition has been filed. Going by the averments in paragraph 4 of the writ petition itself, he had only 84 marks out of 200 for Mathematics. 2. According to the learned Government Pleader, as per the prospectus, to be eligible, a student should have a minimum of 50% marks. From this submission made by the learned Government Pleader it is obvious that the petitioner is an ineligible candidate. If that be so, first petitioner can have no legitimate grievance that admission has been denied to him. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs