IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 462 of 1984 with FIRST APPEAL No 463 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- GURANGINI NIKUNJ PATEL Versus VADILAL CHUNILAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr. P.C.Master for MR HB SHAH for Petitioner in all matters. RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1,7 MR PR JANI for Respondent No. 2-6 MR PV NANAVATI for Respondent No. 8 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA and MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH Date of Order: 20/11/2002 ORAL ORDER (Per : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA) All these appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment as they are arising out of the main common judgment and order passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal no. 4, Ahmedabad. 2. Appeal nos. 462 and 464 of 1984 are filed by the owner of the vehicle, whereas First Appeal no.463 of 1984 is filed by the minor Utpal Ambukumar Patel. 3. In all these matters, the learned counsel Mr. Master appearing for Mr. H.B.Shah for the appellants has taken us through the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal and the reasons assigned in it as well as he has also taken us through oral as well as documentary evidence on record. 4. Having gone through the same, Mr. Master was hardly in a position to assail the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal. Therefore, we are not in a position to entertain these appeals. 5. Having carefully gone through the reasons assigned by the learned Tribunal in its common judgment and award, we do not see any reason to interfere with these appeals. Accordingly, all these appeals fail and are hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. (B.J.Shethna,J) (Kundan Singh,J) ***darji