MST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.758 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2253 OF 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, Court’s or appearances, Court’s Judge’s order orders or directions & Registrar’s orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B.G.Waddhawa for applicant. B.S.Chandnani for respondents 1 to 3 CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 09th March 2007 PC : 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for first to third respondents. The advocate for first to third respondents states that fourth respondent is not the legal representative of the deceased respondent. In view of this statement, learned advocate for the applicant seeks permission to delete the name of respondent no.4. Accordingly, permission is granted to delete the name at the risk of applicant. 2. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Application is allowed and the applicants are permitted to bring on record the names of the first to third respondents as legal representatives of deceased respondent. Amendment to be carried out within a period of six weeks. (A.S.OKA, J.)