IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2010/ 21ST ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 146 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20765/2006 Dated 11/08/2006 .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------- 1. K.MAMARU, S/O.RAVUNNI, AGED 54 YEARS, DEPOT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MALAPPURAM. 2. C.M.SYED ALAVI, S/O.P.Y.MOHAMMED, AGED 55 YEARS, MECHANIC (SPECIAL GRADE), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. S.ABDUL RAZACK, S/O.SAIDALI, AGED 53 YEARS, ASSISTANT DEPOT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PALAKKAD. 4. K.B.HANEEFA, (MECHANIC (RETIRED), K.S.R.T.C), S/O.BABJI, AGED 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT 33/100, KUNNATH HOUSE, KAIRALI GARDEN, OPP.POWER STATION, VENNAKKARA, THIRUNELLAYI.P.O, PALAKKAD-678 020. BY ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.JIBU P THOMAS SRI.P.S.APPU SRI.A.R.NIMOD SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. K.K.BALAKRISHNAN, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN), ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MALAPPURAM. 2. A.VENUGOPAL, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN), ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PALAKKAD. 3. L.REMADEVI, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN), SECRETARY, THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT WORKERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.T-133, M.N.ROAD, THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R3 ADV.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR - SC FOR KSRTC. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.O.C.No. 146 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of July, 2010 Judgment Learned Standing Counsel who appears for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the entire amount has been paid to respondent No.3, to be adjusted to the loan accounts of the petitioners. In the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.3 it is stated that after receipt of the amount the accounts have been closed. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in this contempt case. Therefore it is closed. A.K. Basheer Judge. an.