^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfCHHATTISGARH) /" WRFT PETITION N0, '3^.62-/2Q05' PETITIOMER: <\^5>". ^cp^^ ^^-^ .....^^••'•""" ^9" .^\^rYL^~ .^^'^^u'" ^^' Sri Mahamaya Devi Co-Operative Housing Society Through: The President Vinay Nampalliwar S/o A.R. Nampalliwar,Aged about 40 years, R/o Chhota Para, RaipurC.G. <^0 <.^^>- VERSUS RESPONDENTS _Q '^^.^ ¥ The state of Chhattisgarh Through the secretary housing and ,. environment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G The Director town and country planing, Raipur, C.G. The deputy director housing and environment, Raipur, C.G. ^ PEffTION UNDER ARTICLE 22^ & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS, DIRECTIONS AND/OR ORDERS DETAILS OFTHE PETITION ^^_.r^^i^AS^ XI-HC-22 3TT^T^)T f<^i<=h3TI^T ^TT^^rf?cT 1«- Wws^^.: -. 3^ ^NId^, ^Tfl^41<o, RldWy 3TT^T <?5|C»» HTHCTTe^WT^ .^.p^-..^^ 200^- ^ 3^T^RTTW^f?cT 25-7-2005 Shri S.C. Verma, coun^l Shri Yashwant Singh Tl^ respondents. Heard both the counsel. The petitioner has pref^ 226/227 of the Constitution ^ petitioner is that the petitione^ housing activities. The petition^ 28-12-2001 bearing Khasra No^ Telibandha, Raspur and physicc^ the petitioner, Thereafter, th^ that tond and given possessi respondent No.3 ordered to hc^ ^ction and advance possession taking over the possession <^ amendment has been incorpora provided that if the builder/co land, in that case he is bound the rate prescribed. Further case of the amendment, the petjtioner mac Gbl<4l<rt41<rt WRTf^ fe^f <fa^l< ^3Tf^T3TT^T For the petitioner. akur, <?ovt, Advocate for the State/ ^rred this writ petition under Article ^f India. The main grievance of the is a registered society and engaged in -r society was allotted piece of land on 360/1, area 89,298 sq. ft. situated at possession of the same was given to ^ petitioner constructed the houses on m to the members also, However, id over 15% of the land to the weaker was also taken by respondents. After f 15% of the land by respondents, ted in the scheme wherein it has been lonizer is ready to take back the same t-o pay a premium of the same bnd at petitioner is 1+iat after the sa\d le representations to the respondents that he is ready to pay the prescribed rates ound 15% of('ft&^i^id XI-HC-22 3T1^T^)T f^ri^w^r ^TOF^cT ^^14)^ '"/' Barve y.^t" 3^ »<<|^i<n^, ^TO^^Ko, fs«rtl<My 311^1 ^5<<St» ^ll^dl A^lcb -t---------< ^ 200 /'L 3T1^T^RTTW^cT -^ which was taken from him bfc representation was made on l^ deciding the representation. Learned counsel for thel No.l be directed to decid4 petitioner to which learned cou| Having heard learned coi| to the facts and circumstan^ directed to decide the period of 2 months in an ob]e\. points raised by the petitioner| With the direction Parties are entitled for b handed over to him and last such -7-2005, but the respondents are not represe|ntation afordsaid cbi^I<n41^ WRTf^ te^ <Rt^i< ^3=rf^T3T1^T petitioner submitted that respondent the representation made by the i|isel for respondents has no objection. ^insel for the parties and having regard ^es of the case, respondent No.l is made by the petitioner within a -|ctive mcxnner after considering all the |in accordance with law. sjsaid, the petition stdnds disposed of. ^ertified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (<^^f^)