THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.871 of 2009 Date:21.08.2009 Between: Patnaikuni Ramakrishna Rao and another. ..Petitioners and Sirasapalli Demudu and others. ..Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.871 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is filed seeking a direction to the Court of I Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, to dispose of I.A.No.1709 of 2007 in O.S.No.405 of 2007. The petitioners herein are defendant Nos.4 and 5 and respondent Nos.3 to 5 herein are defendant Nos.1 to 3 in the suit filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein for cancellation of document dated 21.09.2006 and for permanent injunction. The respondent Nos.1 and 2/plantiffs also filed I.A.Nos.1709 and 1710 of 2007 seeking ad interim injunction against the defendants. The trial Court, on 28.12.2007, granted injunction in both the interlocutory applications and the petitioners herein filed counters on 28.03.2008. The grievance of the petitioners is that though they filed counter, the trial Court is not considering the same and passing appropriate orders in I.A.No.1709 of 2007. Hence, this revision. A perusal of the material available on record shows that the trial Court, while granting interim injunction on 28.12.2007, posted I.A.No.1709 of 2007 for hearing to 17.01.2008 and thereafter though counter was filed on 28.03.2008, no orders have been passed in the interlocutory application so far or even reasons were recorded for not passing orders. Order XXXIX Rule 3-A C.P.C. mandates, where an injunction has been granted without giving notice to the opposite party, the Court shall make an endeavour to finally dispose of the application within thirty days from the date on which the injunction was granted and where it is unable to do so, it shall record reasons for such inability. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the provision of law stated above, it would suffice in the interests of justice to direct the trial Court to pass appropriate orders in I.A.No.1709 of 2007 filed by the petitioners/defendant Nos.4 and 5 in O.S.No.405 of 2007, after considering the counter, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J 21st August, 2009 GHN