G ’ <6 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT EELASPUR: CHHATTISGARH Single Bench Hon’bie Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. ¢ontempt Petition'NoJ8 OF 2005 Petitioner Smt. Uma Singh, Wio. Surendra Kumar Singh, Aged about 59 years, Rio. Kanya Shiksha Parisar, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) Vs. Resnondents 1. Shri MK. Rawat Secretary, Tribal Weifare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Shri Mane} Pingua (Coliector Ambikapur), Coiiector Bungalow (Collector Residence) D.C. Road, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) 3. Shri KR. Thakur, Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ambikapur, Officers Colony, Gandhi Chowk Namanakala, Ambikapur, Surguja (0G,) 4. Ku. Satvavati Kinda, Principal Government Hr. Sec. Schocl Derima, D/o. Shri Siyazar Kineio, Rio. Ward Nc.8, Patparia, Post Reghawapuri, P.S. Gandhinagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Present: Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. Advocate General for the respondents. ORAL OREER (Passed on 15m March, 2007) This Court by its order dated 09.05.2005, passed in Writ Petition No.18S3/2005 had issued the following directions: “Having heard learned counsel/forjhe petitioner, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also looking to the limited request made by learned counsel for the petitioner which appears to be just and fair, the petitioner is .aiiowed to make a detailed representation along with copy of this petition to respondent No.1 within a period of 15 days from today and in turn respondent No.1 witi decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation after considering ail the points raised by the petitioner in an objective manner in accordance with law, as far as possible try to adjust the petitioner in the nearby area so as to enable her to attend the daiiy needs of her father-in- iaw. Till then, the petitioner should not be reiievecl, if she is already not relieved (2) The respondents had passed an order dated 10.06.2005 relieving the petitioner from the post she was holding and they have transferred her to another place. Aggrieved by that order, she had already fited a writ petition before this Court and the same is pending for consideration. (3) in my opinion, in view of this devetopmentrthe reiief sought for in this contempt petition would not survive for consideration of this Court. Therefore, the contempt proceedings are dropped. Ordered accordingly.