IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.410/2011 Date of decision:20.1.2011. Kashmir Singh and another .............Petitioner v Satpal and another ..............Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.PK Garg,Advocate for the petitioners. Jaswant Singh,J. Petitioners/defendants 2 and 3 by filing the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have assailed the order dated 13.1.2011 (P3) whereby their application dated 25.11.2010 seeking permission to recall DW1 and DW2, stood dismissed. It is not disputed that DW1 Sukhdev Singh and DW2 Rai Singh were examined and cross examined on 1.8.2008 and 29.8.2008 respectively in evidence of co-defendant no.1 Sukhdev Singh. At that time the petitioners, who are defendant nos. 2 and 3 were already ex parte. Subsequently, they moved an application for setting aside ex parte proceedings, which was allowed and the petitioners/defendants 2 and 3 were permitted to join the proceedings. Thereafter petitioners/defendants filed written statement, issues were re-framed on 12.6.2009 and plaintiff led his evidence. However, after re-framing of issues on 12.6.2009, defendant no.1 did not examine DW1 Sukhdev Singh and DW2 Rai Singh afresh. Accordingly, the learned trial Court dismissed the application moved by the petitioners for recalling DW1 and DW2 holding that there was no need to recall them, obviously in the absence of any evidence tendered by them. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition. Ordered accordingly. 20.1.2011. (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge