SIWE Bench THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA'FURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTI GARH Wnt Petltlon No3¥ {6 \of 2005 Chandru Ram Bhagat, S/o Sim Bhukla Ram Bhagat, Agedgabout 42 years Presently posted and working as Upper Division Teacher, Mlddie School Rangola, ‘ Block Jashpur Nagari D1stnct Jashpur Chhattisgarh Versus - State of Chhattisgarh, ‘ThroUgh the Secretary; i Deptt. of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe Development, D.K.S.' Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Commissioner, Deptt. of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe Development, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Collector Jashpur » Distnct Jashpur Chhatusgarh t The Assistant’Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER, ARTICLE 226/2 7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS DIRECTIONS ETC IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY \ OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE The pet1t10ner above named most respectfully begs to submit as under - /Y" N - , / XI-Hc-22 ' @ i 5 I 1 mmw ' mifm‘hm#wm 32.08.2005 n § } Shn Sameer Behar coun iel for that peu'tioncr.’ Shn Akhll Agmwal Panel Lawyer for the Stam/ mspondents on advance copy Heard on admission. t J § \ The subunss1on of the lmrned counsel for the petitioner. is that 336 days have been wrcngly *Ieated as the ‘days of non- workmg by the petitioner, by an order dated 08.04.2002 passed by\ t thei Assistant Commissioner, Aadivasi Vikas, Jaspur. Learned s that against the aforesaid order, appeal before the Commissioner vide Annexure—PL6 on 20.0 .2002. He further submits that i thereafter, when the post o missioner was abolished in the State of Chhattisgarh the pen ' ner made a representanon to the x counsel for the petitioner su the‘ petitioner had pieferre necessaxy dilection b‘e issue isposal of statutoty‘ appeal nled by the peh'iioner before the C 't b d f m d r d o ' ;2‘_’ '_ y w§nanaw ovrernni/ent‘ by“ appointing the: appellate authority to decide the! appeal even aiier abolmbn of 1'11 e post of Commssmner I At tins stage learned co sel for the peuhoner subrmts that t1hc peupqn mayi be dispo éuthoxiu'gs to dispose of the eal of the pe11'1ioifer‘so that ’ the] Iéaatter comee to an end. a E In file facts and cimcn es of the case 1t 1s directed that the concerned Secretary of th smte W111 look mto the matter so that the appea'l nled by the pe 'tloner befoxe the Comms$loner on; 20,05.2002 g decided at an e i 1y date in accordance with law. « Y The'petitioner will me application befole the concerned $ecreta1y for wacing out his a peal along with a copy of this order: Within a period of one mo ' defmis so that the aforesaid I complied h‘om today g'iiring all necessary K' ions issued by this Court may be‘ Wlth the aforesaid due ns, the pehuon stands disposed of at this stage. E _ 5‘“ . ‘ ‘ Sunll Kumar Judge Smha l ‘\ of w1th a dnectlon to the State ‘ A p ms c n d' s t c o wG