IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010 / 1ST ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 2437 of 2010(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.G.GEORGE, PRESIDENT MANAGING COMMITTEE, MATHIRIPPILLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, KOTHAMANGALAM,ERNAKULAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), ERNAKULAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AUDIT), ERNAKULAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), KOTHAMANGALAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.2437 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is the President of Mathirappilly Service Co- operative Bank Ltd., has filed this Writ Petition for completion of the auditing of the accounts of the Society for the years 2007-'08 and 2008-'09 within a time frame and for such other reliefs. According to the petitioner, the speedy system of auditing is the concurrent audit system and the Unit Audit system, which was being conducted in the Society, is a time consuming process. However, to change the Unit Audit system to the concurrent audit system, the petitioner was to remit certain amounts. Based on the interim order passed by this Court, the amount to be remitted for that purpose was duly intimated to the Society and the Society has since then, remitted the said amount. Thereupon, the Unit Audit system, which was being followed to conduct audit in the society was changed to the concurrent audit system and an auditor was appointed to conduct the concurrent auditing. It is thus obvious that the grievance of the petitioner was substantially redressed. The petitioner, now seeks for fixation of an W.P.(C) NO.2437/2010 2 outer time limit for the completion of the audit in respect of the Society for the period mentioned above. I do not think it is possible for this Court to fix any time limit for that purpose. However, it will only be appropriate that the auditor expedite the auditing for the aforesaid years viz., 2007-'08, 2008-'09 and for subsequent years. This Writ Petition is disposed of, accordingly. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.2437/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010 W.P.(C) NO.2437/2010 4