1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2036 OF 2006. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders _______________________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.S.Vaditel, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. R.G. Agrawal, Adv. for Respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 05, 2007. 1. In the background that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the order of transfer was propelled by malafides Central Administrative Tribunal was right in refusing to interfere, 2. It is sheer co-incidence that petitioner's anonymous complaint and action against some officers have followed by the transfer of petitioner. 3. Petitioner's case does not fall within the exceptional nature which can be contemplated from para 8 of reported judgment in State of U.P. Vs. Gobardhan Lal, reported at (2004) 11 SCC P. 402. 2 4. We do not find any reason, such as error of law or jurisdiction, creeping in the order of the Tribunal. This Court is, therefore, satisfied that there is no justifiable reason to interfere in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution. 5. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE. JUDGE. RR.