1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4134 OF 2009 M/s. Superpack Industries, (through its Proprietor), Plot No.C-132, MIDC, Waluj, Aurangabad. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The Assistant Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub Regional Office, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Plot No.2, Town Centre, Cidco, New Aurangabad 431 003. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Mr.R.P. Bhumkar Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.K.B. Choudhari Advocate for Respondent. ... CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 18TH AUGUST, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the Respondent. Present Petition 2 preferred by the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21st September, 2007 passed by the Assistant E.P. F. Commissioner, S.R.O. Aurangabad and the communication letter dated 30th January, 2009 issued by the Recovery Officer/APFC, S.R.O., Aurangabad. It is the case of the Petitioner that it remained on the part of the Respondents to serve the copy of order dated 21st September, 2007 on them. They received letter dated 30th January, 2009 from Recovery Officer in respect of P.F. damages amounting to Rs.1,80,054/- for the period from 07/93 to 08/95. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that thereafter the Petitioner preferred application dated 20th January, 2009 before the Assistant E.P.F. Commissioner, S.R.O. Aurangabad for review of the order passed under Section 7-A for the period 07/93 to 08/95 in respect of M/s. Superpack Industries. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondents, states that the Authorities will decide the Petitioner's application dated 20th January, 2009, which is on page 3 40 of the present Petition within six weeks from today. Learned counsel for the Respondent states that the Petitioner should appear before the Assistant E.P. F. Commissioner, S.R.O. Aurangabad on 25th August, 2009 at 11.00 a.m. for personal hearing in respect of their application dated 20th January, 2009. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner undertakes to appear before the concerned authority on 25th August, 2009. 3. On the said assurance of the learned counsel for the Respondent, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition with the aforesaid liberty. Writ Petition is disposed of with the liberty sought for. [K.K. TATED, J.] asb/AUG09/wp4134.09