CW - 4648/2006 - Mani Lal Rawat & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. : Order dt.4.4.08 1/1 S.B. CIVILWRIT PETITION NO.4648/2006 Mani Lal Rawat & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. Date : 04.04.2008 PRESENT 0 HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Rohitas Singh for Dr. P.S. Bhati for the petitioners. Mr. S.G. Ojha for the respondents. --------- 1. The grievance raised in the writ petition is that the petitioner was not given admission in the B.Ed. Course through P.T.E.T. Examination 2006 as a candidate belonging to SC/ST Category for which reservation to the extent of 45% was made vide Annex.3 letter of Dy. Secretary of Government of Rajasthan for the session 2001-02. The petitioner applied for the said course for the year 2006 and came to this Court with the case that he secured 316 marks in the examination and he ought to have been provided admission in the said course. He opted for Art stream in the said course. The learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out certain cases in the pleadings in the writ petition as well as in rejoinder that certain other candidates obtaining lesser marks were provided admission in the said course. CW - 4648/2006 - Mani Lal Rawat & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. : Order dt.4.4.08 2/2 2. However, these submissions are opposed by Mr. S.G. Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents, who submitted that none of the candidates who secured lesser marks than 316 marks obtained by the petitioner was given admission in the Arts stream of the said course and thus, no case of discrimination is made out. He further urged that since the course commencing in 2006 is now no longer available, the petitioner cannot be given admission at this stage and the writ petition has become infructuous by sheer lapse of time. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case now obtaining before this Court, it is true that the petitioner cannot be provided any relief because the admission process for the said course for the year 2006 was over long back and prima facie no case of discrimination is established by the petitioner as no candidate securing lesser marks than 316 obtained by the petitioner was provided admission in the year 2006 in Arts stream of the said course. 4. The writ petition has thus become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. No costs. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.36 babulal/-