IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2011 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 19644 of 2011(E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ANOOP KRISHNAN,MINOR,REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER, RADHAKRISHNAN,ANOOP BHAVAN,KARUVATTA, HARIPAD. BY ADVS. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR, SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR). RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. BOARD OF PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE HEAD MASTER,TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL, HARIPAD. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASHREE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.19644/2011-E: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE RESULTS SHEET PUBLISHED BY THE R.1. IN THE INTERNET. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE SELECTION MEMO. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 19644 of 2011 E ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 27th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner completed his 10th standard in the second respondent school. Petitioner submits that, in all subjects, except in 'Workshop Practice', he obtained very good marks and that, in Ext.P1 mark list, his Grade has been shown wrongly for the examination for THSLC. It is with this allegation, the writ petition was filed with the following prayers:- “(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to issue the original mark list to the petitioner in tune with Ext.P1 result sheet published by the first respondent. (ii) Declare that Grade C in the examination for THSLC makes the W.P.(C) No.19644/2011 : 2 : students eligible for higher studies and that the petitioner is eligible for higher studies in terms of Ext.P1 result sheet. (iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order directing the first respondent to cause the petitioner's record book and other records in Workshop Practice evaluated by another examiner and to award him marks based on such an evaluation.” 2. When the case came up for admission on 02.08.2011, the learned Government Pleader submitted that Ext.P1 contained only provisional result and the result indicated therein was erroneous. It was also stated that, as against EHS in Ext.P1, it ought to have been NHS and that, the said mistake in Ext.P1 was corrected when the final mark list was issued to the petitioner. 3. The fact that the final mark list has been issued and that in the final mark list so issued, as against EHS, NHS has been mentioned is also confirmed by the learned W.P.(C) No.19644/2011 : 3 : Government Pleader. 4. In such circumstances, I see no reason for this Court to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/27/10 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge