303crra33.09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision Application No. 33 of 2009 Sunil Pyarelal Agrawal Vs. State Of Mah. & Gopal N. Agrawal. Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Ms MN Ghatade,Adv. for the applicant. Mr. DB Patel, Adv. for N.A.--1/State. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 30th March, 2009 This revision is directed against the judgment of acquittal rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gondia whereby he acquitted non-applicant No. 2 for the offence punishable under Sections 461 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. The revision- applicant/original complainant had sought to prosecute N. A. No. 2- Gopal Agrawal on the allegation that Gopal Agrawal had stolen about 17 quintals of shellac from his godown and sought to sell 2 quintals of such stolen shellac to himself. Then he discovered that shellac was stolen from his own godown. If 17 qts. of shellac is, in fact stolen, the applicant should have noticed that there is theft and could not have waited till the accused came to sell the same shellac to the applicant. It is hard to believe the story given by the applicant in his examination in chief itself. Further scrutiny of evidence is thoroughly unwarranted. The view taken by the learned Magistrate is perfectly plausible and not at all perverse, therefore, does not call for any interference. The revision application stands dismissed. JUDGE wwl