@ ii'IGH C(liURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETKTION (S) No. 3372 01‘2007 Karam Lai Dansena Aged about 50 Years, S/o Shri Sadai Ram Dansena, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Bake1i. Block Kharsia. Bistt. Raigarh (C.G.) PETITKONER VERSUS . Staie of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schoo1 Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur goo.) RESPONDENTS The Director Puhlic Emiracéon Deomment Raipur (C. G.) 3. Dimici Education Officer Raigarh District Raigarh (CG) 4. Block Education Gi’fiqer Khamia Digit. Raigarh (CGJ 5. Assistant Commissioiier Tribal WeEare Department, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Singie Bench : Iion’hie Justice Shri Satish 1x. 1, Agiiihoii‘i. Fresent: Shri Anil Mourya. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Govt. Advocate for the Statekespmldents. - ORDER )b {Passed on 20m day ef June, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale wefthe date of initial appointmem or from the date ofcompletion of probation period. 2. Learned oounsei appearing for the petitioner as weil as for the State/respondents jointly Submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 597622006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others). which was allowed vide order dated 7.1 1.2006. 3. In View of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the patties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sdl- « Satish K. Agnihotri Judge