1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.5440 Of 2009 In Second Appeal No.353 Of 2009 Vijayabai Himmatrao Shahane. ... Applicant. Versus Gopalkrushna Dudha Utpadak Sahakari Society, Amalner And Others. . ... Respondents. -------- Shri. Subodh P. Shah, Advocate for applicant. Shri. S.V. Gangapurwala, Advocate for respondent Nos.1,2,4,5 and 6. -------- CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATE: 17th FEBRUARY 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard Shri. Shah, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Shri. S.V. Gangapurwala, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1,2,4,5 and 6. 2 2) It is pointed out that the decree of perpetual injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff / appellant herein on 14-8-2006. During pendency of the suit which was presented in 1992, there was order of injunction operating in favour of the plaintiff. Even after dismissal of the appeal, interest of the plaintiff is protected by the First Appellate Court till expiry of period of appeal. 3) Considering the evidence placed on record prima facie I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is in possession of the suit property and her possession needs to be protected. 4) Hence interim relief in terms of prayer clause (A). The application stands disposed of. (R.M. BORDE, J.) rsl/ ca.5440.09