R.S.A No. 3528 of 2008(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 3528 of 2008 Date of decision : November 18, 2008 Haryana Urban Development Authority & another ...... Appellants. through Ms. Preeti Khanna, Advocate v. Usha Rani ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This is an appeal against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below setting aside the resumption order passed by the appellants against the respondent on the ground that no notice, as envisaged by the HUDA Act, was ever served upon the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellants, though not challenging the findings of fact, has argued that the respondent is admittedly in arrears of balance consideration amount and, therefore, was not entitled to any discretionary relief. She has further argued that now there would be no way for the appellants to recovery the money. In my opinion, this apprehension of the appellants is clearly misconceived. The decree, which has been passed in favour of the respondent, merely sets aside the resumption order and restrains the R.S.A No. 3528 of 2008(O&M) ::2:: appellants from dis-possessing the respondent except in due course of law. There is clearly no bar for the appellants to now initiate proceedings in accordance with law to recover their dues. Consequently, I hold that the questions of law proposed in this appeal do not arise. The present appeal is, thus, dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 18 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'