1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1460 OF 2010 Deepak Vijay Wankhedkar ....Applicant. Versus Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar and others ....Respondents. Shri. Phatale with M.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri. P.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Shri. K.C. Sant, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, S.S.SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 26th March, 2010 PER COURT : 1. This review petition is filed for review of order passed by this Court on 2nd March 2010 in writ petition No. 1460/2010. The copy of the said order is annexed to the review application. 2. In all five grounds are raised in review application. So far as the first ground is concerned, same may be available for filing an appeal, but certainly not for reviewing the order dated 2nd of March 2010. A power of review is not to be confused with the appellate power which may 2 enable an Appellate Court to correct all manners of errors committed by the Subordinate Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in para No. 3 in the case of A.T. Sharma V. A.P. Sharma reported in AIR 1979 SC 1047 has observed, thus :- "It is true as observed by this Court in Shivdeo Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1963 SC 1909) there is nothing in Article 226 of the Constitution to preclude a High Court from exercising the power of review which inheres in every Court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. But, there are definitive limits to the exercise of the power of review. The power of review may be exercised on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made; it may be exercised where some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is found; it may also be exercised on any analogous ground. But, it may not be exercised on the ground that the decision was erroneous on merits. That would be the province of a Court of appeal. A power of review is not to be confused with appellate power which may enable an Appellate Court to correct all manner of errors committed by the Subordinate Court." 3. So far as the ground Nos. 2 to 4 in review application are concerned, the relief which is claimed by way of said grounds was also pleaded in the writ petition and to that effect, to some extent pleadings were taken in para 4, 6 and 7 of the writ petition. So far as ground No. 5 is concerned, same is general in nature and cannot be a ground for reviewing the earlier order passed by this Court on 2nd March 2010. 3 4. We have considered the application seeking review of our earlier order dated 2.3.2010. We have considered the provisions of law so also the original petition which is available on the file and having considered the submissions of the parties, in our view, no ground or error apparent on the face of the record is established to invoke the review jurisdiction of this Court. We see no substance in the application. In the result, the application is dismissed. No order as to costs. [ S.S.SHINDE, J. ] [ R.M. BORDE, J. ] ssc/ra53.10.