WP(C) 6760/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. P. Chakraborty , learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department appearing for all the resp ondents. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is that though she has been engaged as Anganwadi Worker and is serving for last 18 (eighteen) years, her cas e on earlier occasion for promotion to the post of Supervisor against the 25% qu ota has not been considered. The petitioner apprehends that in the ensuing proc ess of promotion to the post of Supervisor, her case may also not be considered. The petitioner, therefore, prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to consider her case for promotion to the post of Supervisor against the quota f ixed for that purpose. It is the contention of Ms. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfar e Department that if the petitioner comes within the zone of promotion, her case would be considered in terms of the guideline and the decision of the Governmen t in that regard. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Supervisor against the quota fixed for that purpose and in terms of the service orders formulated in that regard provided the petitioner comes within the zone o f consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.