THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 2383 of 2006 DATED 14.02.2006 Between: N.Chandrayudu ..... PETITIONER AND The General Manager, Ananthapur Dist.Coop. Central Bank Limited and another .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 2383 of 2006 ORDER: The writ petition is misconceived. The petitioner seeks a direction by way of writ in the nature of Mandamus to the second respondent to dispose of his representation, dated 10.11.2005. On 10.11.2005 the petitioner addressed the second respondent-District Cooperative Officer complaining that without any liability or fault on his part the Ananthapur District Cooperative Central Bank Limited had issued an execution notice to him and intends to move against the petitioner’s properties in respect of certain irregularities and mal-functioning in the Ananthapur District Para Medical Employees Co- operative Society. The petitioner’s complaint is that the second respondent has not responded to this representation. Mandamus will not be issued to direct an authority to dispose of correspondence addressed by an individual. The letter, dated 10.11.2005 addressed by the petitioner to the second respondent is neither an appeal or revision. There is no obligation on the second respondent to deal with every correspondence. A legal obligation is the foundation for issuance of a Mandamus. There is no discernable legal obligation. No mandamus can be issued. The writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________ 14-02-2006 kvrm