IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD and HON’BLE SRI JUSTSICE K.G. SHANKAR Appeal Suit No.1044 of 1994 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer (Revenue Divisional Officer), Srikakulam .. Appellant AND Silla Jagannadha Prasad and others .. Respondents JUDGMENT: (Per G. Bhavani Prasad,J) Heard Sri Karanam Ramesh, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. The award under appeal is one under which the enhancement of market value along with consequential statutory benefits was in favour of all the claimants and due to non- compliance with the conditional order passed by this Court on 18- 08-2010, the appeal stood dismissed for default in respect of respondents 1, 2 and 6 due to failure to take fresh notices to respondents 1 and 2 and steps for the 6th respondent. As the appeal having stood, thus, dismissed against respondents 1, 2 and 6, it cannot be considered to be properly constituted against the other respondents, as any continuance of the appeal against the other respondents is likely to result in contradictory decrees and therefore, the appeal does not survive against the other respondents also. Hence, in the light of the dismissal of the appeal against respondents 1, 2 and 6 in terms of the Court order, dated 18-08-2010, this appeal is dismissed against the other respondents also without costs as not maintainable any longer. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J _______________ K.G. SHANKAR, J Date: 28-12-2010 Svv