AA A gEFORE THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL' AT JABALPUR (A. NO [1999 Pet itioners Farmesh patel s/o chakradhar Singh, aged about 35 years, working as Asstt. Teacher, 1n the Govt. Middle School Kirari via Chandrapnr Tehsil Dabhra District Janjgir. Tekaram Dansena S/o Chunnilal aged about 36 years, working as Assistant Teacher at Middle School Singitarai district Janjgir (M.P.) Narottam Patel S/c Roonlal Patel, aged about 34 years, 4 working as Asstt. Teacher at Midd 1e School Singitarai distr ict Jan jgir . Kaushal prasad patel s/o Daduram Patel, aged about 3 years, working as Assistant Teacher in Janpad Panchayat x Primary Girls School kotmi, Tehsi l Dabhra district Bilasnur. ‘VerSuS- / Res pondents State of Madhya pradesh through Secretary, De rtment of School Educat ion, alabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.) Director, Public Instruction Satpuda Bhavan, Bhopal. District Education officer, School Educat ion , Jan jgir distr ict Janjgir-champa SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ‘ ‘ TREBUNAL ACT APPLICATION UNDER . W dg ”A L 4 / l s T4 mmw wg;..1.&.7..l¢.ce;11120 W21 W (W) mamm anaam mm§wm $3r§tmnésr mm 1&3 anéal dated 13.1 .201 O, instruction have been piaced with him along with copy of order dated 2.2.2009 wh' h shows that the petitioner has now been granted benefit of up-grada on/promotion to the post of Upper Division Teacher (Science). Learned counsel fort e petitioner submits that as the prayer made ‘ in this petition was with rega to the grievance arising on account of non- promotion /up—gradation, the etition is now rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that though promotion has been grant , the petitioner may have grievance with regard to consequential ben Its. Taking into conside ation the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the ition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take such recourse to remedy available under the law if any with regard to any other claim pursuant to the order 01' promotionlu'p-gradation. Sinha B: Hon’ble Shri Manindra ohan Shrivastava 25.01.2010 Shri BD. Guru, couns i for the petitioners. o . Shri Satish Gupta, G Advocate for the State/respondents. Learned counsel for t e State submits that pursuant to the order i Sd/-# Manindra Mohan Shrivastav’a: Judge i {m S J. e . t