IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 500 OF 2008 SHRI. KESHAV KAMAT ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Aires Rodrigues, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 19th September, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Aires Rodrigues, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner. The Petitioner approached the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission with certain grievances against Respondent No.2, as regards deficiency in services. That complaint came to be rejected on 15-7-2008. Against that Order the present Writ Petition has been filed. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides for an ordinary remedy of an appeal against an order made by the State Commission to the National Commission, in terms of Section 19 of the said Act. Learned Counsel submits that the Petitioner's complaint was not at all entertained, for the Petitioner to have approached the National Commission. The very fact that the Petitioner was heard into the complaint filed by the Petitioner and then the complaint was dismissed clearly shows that the complaint of the Petitioner was entertained by the State Commission and then rejected in limine. Since ordinary remedy is provided to the Petitioner, this Court need not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction. Petition rejected. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.