IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16263 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2011 Kulvinder Singh son of Sh. Surjeet Singh, resident of Village Morthali, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra ... Petitioner Versus Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of External Affiars, Patiala House, New Delhi and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-4), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by respondent No.2 within a particular time. 2. The legal notice shall be decided by respondent No.2 if the same is represented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. This shall not be taken as making any favourable finding that the petitioner was born only in the year 1964 and not in the manner as originally referred to in the Passport. 4. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. ( K. KANNAN ) SEPTEMBER 02, 2011 JUDGE Rajan