IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36616 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2011 Pooja Rani and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present : Mr. Ranjodh Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG Punjab 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RITU BAHRI J. (ORAL) The petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is for issuance of direction to respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and further to ensure that they may not harassed by respondent No. 4. Counsel for the State on the instructions of ASI Davender Parkash has informed the Court that statements of Pooja Rani and her father respondent No. 4 – Chaman Lal have been recorded by the Police and they have stated that they need not require any police protection. In view of the statements recorded by the Police, no further order is required to be passed on this petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (RITU BAHRI) 28.03.2011 JUDGE reena