IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2010 / 22ND ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 868 of 2010(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23262/2010 Dated 26/07/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC --------------------------------------- M/S.ALTIMA TOURS AND TRAVELS PRIVATE LTD., CORPORATION BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PEER MOHAMMED. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C) ------------------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS INDIAN AFFAIRS, PRAVASI BHARATIYA KARYA MANTRALAYA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, AKBAR BHAVAN, SATYA MARG., 'CHANAKYAPURI', NEW DELHI-12 (APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER EMIGRATION ACT). 2. PROTECTOR GENERAL OF EMIGRANTS REGISTERING AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF THE PROTECTOR GENERAL OF EMIGRANTS, MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS INDIAN AFFAIRS,PRAVASI BHARATIYA KARYA MANTRALAYA,AKBAR BHAVAN,SATYA MARG.'CHANAKYAPURI',NEW DELHI-12. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI FOR R1-2 SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIMKHAN, ASST.S.G. FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------ R.P.NO.868 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) No.23262 OF 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of October, 2010 ORDER The petitioner seeks review of my judgment dated 26.7.2010 in the writ petition. In the judgment, I permitted the petitioner to file an appeal and stay petition against the impugned order and directed that implementation of the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance for 45 days to enable the petitioner to move the stay petition and get interim orders. 2. The petitioner now submits that as directed by this Court, the petitioner has filed an appeal and stay petition. But, no orders have been passed in the stay petition and in the meanwhile, the stay granted by this Court has already expired. 3. The learned Asst. Solicitor General submits that there is no practice of posting the stay petition and passing orders. They seek four weeks' time to pass orders. 4. I am of opinion that the appeal being a statutory appeal, the concerned respondent has a duty to pass orders on R.P.No.868/10 in W.P.(c)No.23262/10 2 the stay petition also expeditiously. The same having not been done, I am inclined to review the judgment and to extend the stay until orders are passed in the stay petition. Accordingly, the judgment is reviewed to that extent and I extend the stay granted as per the judgment until orders are passed in the stay petition. The review petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd R.P.No.868/10 in W.P.(c)No.23262/10 3