IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 79/2011 (S/S) Surendra Nath .…. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others. .… Respondents February 7, 2011 Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel, present for the State/respondents. HON’BLE PRAFULLA C. PANT, J. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ of certiorari quashing the transfer order dated 3.8.2010, and the order of relieving passed on 18.1.2011. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 3. Writ petitioner is an Assistant District Panchayat Raj Officer posted in Tehri, and by the aforesaid impugned orders dated 3.8.2010 and 18.1.2011, he has been transferred and relieved for Uttarkashi. The impugned order dated 3.8.2010 (copy Annexurre 1) shows that the said order was passed in the public interest by the authority concerned under Para 10 of the Transfer Policy of the year 2010. It further appears that on the request of the Chief Development Officer of Tehri Garhwal, relieving of the petitioner was deferred for sometime. Now, the writ petitioner has already been relieved vide order dated 18.1.2011 (copy Annexure 2). 4. Learned Counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s children are studying at 2 Narendra Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal and it is the mid- session. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties, this Court does not find sufficient reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the authorities concerned. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that the writ petitioner may make a representation before the concerned authority to allow his children to stay in the Govt. Accommodation provided to the petitioner till the ongoing academic session is over. (Stay application no. 580 of 2011 stands disposed of.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Vacation Judge 7.2.2011 PRABODH