waH SGuRT OF C¥éHATTISG£RH m‘ BILA5PUR Writ P&i§i§an No‘ 2213 of 20% F’eiit§ane“$ ‘v’ersus Rewondents Ku. Emeida Xaxa D/c S§man Aged about 53 yrs, Assistant Teacher Ku. Aiisa Lakra D/o Bhudhram Aged about 49 yrs‘ Assisiam Teache? Ku. Aiexsia Min} D/o JahanAged about 56 yrs, Asséstani: Teacher $mi. Vincemia Tigga wlo A§exs§yus Aged about 51 yfs, Assis‘tant Teacher $m‘i. Luse}a Lakra Wio Makarius Aged abaui 51 yys, Awisiant Teachey 3m. shami Kuim Wk: SianiEas Aged abow: 5§ yrs, Agsistant Teachéf Aii afe working ai & Address as :— D€bya Bandana G§r§s Middie Schm} ' Jokbahab Disfx. Jashpw (C.G.) Siaie of Chhamsgam, Thmug‘n ihe Secrefary, Departmem of Schooi Educatian, Maniraiay, DAKS. Bhav’vam Raipur (QGJ The Director, Direcicraies sf Pub?§9 insimcfian, Pension Sacia Raigour {3.3.} The D§séf§ct Educa€isr§ Sffker Puimic mstruwcns Jashpm‘ (06.) The Chairman l Mamager, Dibya Sandana GirSs PrSrnary $chcc! JGkhahaia, Chrrstran Peopies Ccmmiriee Jokbahah Disit. Jas’ngzsur (CG) Mr. N. Maiviya, coumei for the petirianers. l Ms. Deepair Pande\ , Panei lawyer r‘or the respondenislsmte QRQER missed cm thrs 72m day or Ami. 2mm The wesriora or raw invoived here‘m is whether trig nan-:eashmg giarf workmg in Governmeni aided sahoei are entrired r0 fire benefi‘r 0f recommendarions of i‘ne Fifrh Pay Commission Lmder the prav§s§ons of rhe Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya $§k3han Sansiha (Adhyapakcm Tatha Any Karrnchariyorr Ke Verena Ka Sarrdaya) Adhmiyam, 1978 {hemefos‘rh ‘ihe 1. 2. 3. 3(: Hom’b§e du$i§ce $§ar§ Sa'rish K. Aamhmri a Adhiniyam, 1978’) and the rubs made thereunder read with the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1988 (henceforth ‘the Pay Rules, 1988‘). The identical question of law was considered by this Court in batch Of matters i.e. Smt. A. Laii vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters (WP No. 4108 of 2005) and by judgment and order dated 6.22007, this Court held that the petitioners who are working in fuliy Government aided private schoels are entitled to the revised pay-scales with effect from 1.1 .1g96 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of payment of arrears had granted certain direction. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the parties that this matter is squarety covered by the judgment and order dated 62.2007 passed by this Court in the case of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters (Supra). As a result, for the reasons stated in the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in WP. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters) (Supra). The Writ petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions. ‘ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge haikur d