IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 16480 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : NOVEMBER 10, 2009 MANJIT KAUR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent-State has apprised the Court that the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed. A public notice has been given in daily newspapers (Vernacular and English) of today. The persons, such as the petitioner, are required to appear before a Committee on 12.11.2009. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the Committee with material or evidence indicating that the certificate that has been termed as bogus in the impugned order, was in fact, genuine. The Civil Writ Petition No. 16480 of 2009 2 Committee would address the issue and pass a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has further informed the Court that earlier a public notice was given in newspapers dated 31.10.2009. The persons were required to appear on 4/5.11.2009. In case, the petitioner has already appeared and submitted the documents, the same would be considered. After inquiry, a speaking and reasoned order would be passed. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter be disposed of as infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. November 10, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?