IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 675 of 2009 Date of Decision : 6.7.2010. Dominic Fernandes ....Petitioner. Versus Union of India & others ...Respondents. __________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh , Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. K.B Khajuria, Central Government No. 1, 3 & 4. Counsel. For Respondent: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate No. 2 General. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since two annual increments due in the year 1993 and 1994 have been withheld with commutative effect. 2. According to the petitioner, in the process, increment due in the year 1992 has also not been released. It is seen from the reply that an enquiry had been conducted and on the basis of that enquiry, a show cause notice had been issued as to why the two increments of the petitioner should not be withheld. The reply is silent as to whether any final order has been passed in the matter. Precisely, that is the case of the petitioner that without passing final order, the tentative decision as reflected in the show cause notice, was implemented. 3. It is seen that the petitioner had represented his grievances before the 2nd respondent by way of Annexute P-11 and P-12. 4. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to look into Annexures P-11 and P-12 and take appropriate action, in accordance with law and justice, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, adverting to the submissions made by the petitioner, some of which, we have referred to above. This shall be down within a period of two months from the date of production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 6, 2010 (HL) ( Justice Kuldip Singh), Judge