IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17458 of 2011 Anil Sahu @ Anil Sah S/o Jagdish Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 04.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 19.12.2010 in a case registered against Ashok Podder and Tinku Kumar for the offences under Section 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In course of investigation, the victim was recovered by police and her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. was recorded. In her statement, she states that petitioner provided intoxicated means to her, as a result of which she became unconscious and when she gained her consciousness, she found herself at Ludhiyana from where she was brought to Samastipur by her father but in Samastipur, police caught her. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact the father of the victim had taken huge amount in loan from the petitioner and when petitioner demanded his money, the father of the victim 2 got falsely implicated the petitioner in this case after pressurizing the victim to take the name of the petitioner in her statement. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case as well as the submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Hayaghat P.S. Case No. 104 of 2010. Safik (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)