IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8983 of 2011 1. RAM PRAVESH RAI SON OF LATE PRADEEP RAI. 2. SATIA DEVI WIFE OF RAM PRAVESH RAI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed two years prior to the occurrence. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that on the date of occurrence, he met with his daughter, who was upset for not being sent to her parents’ house, but, it is alleged that the parents, on the dictate of the husband, have killed the victim. Postmortem report has been brought on record, which suggests no external injury and the viscera have been preserved. Considering the fact that no injury has been 2 found during postmortem and the admission of the informant that victim was upset on the date of occurrence for not going to her parents house, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Mohiuddinnagar P.S. Case No. 108/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)