1 lpa28.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 28 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1889 OF 2009 Shalubai w/o Ginnappa @ Govindrao Khadke, Age: 35 years,Occ: Household, R/o. Kawalyachiwadi, Tq.Parali- Vaijinath, Dist.Beed. ...APPELLANT VERSUS Sukhdeo s/o Ginappa Khade, Age: 35 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Kawlyachiwadi, Tq.Parali- Vaijinath, Dist.Beed. ...RESPONDENT ... Mr. T.G. Gaikwad, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sachin S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent. ... CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2011 PER COURT : The petition has been preferred for setting aside the appellate Court's order by which, it has refused to condone the delay, for 2 lpa28.10 approaching the appellate Court. The dispute is with respect to the issuance of the succession certificate. The respondent herein is the son of the deceased and the appellant claims to be the wife of the deceased. The learned Single Judge has awarded the costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten thousand only) to the appellant while condoning the delay. The learned Single has observed that the respondent, being the son of the deceased, was interested in the subject matter of the suit and therefore, he would not stand to gain in any manner by delaying the proceedings. 2. In our opinion, there is no any error in the impugned order dated 19-11-2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition NO. 1989 of 2009. The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] sut/Apr11