IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.11250 of 2010 RAM PRAVESH SINGH @ BUDHU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. C. Jawahar, APP ------------ 2/ 15.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 341, 342, 427, 348, 386, 121-A, 384 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently his name transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused, but has no criminal antecedent which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail. In view of such and also that the petitioner is in custody since 27.12.2009, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Dehri Indrapuri P.S. case no.573 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner,(ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and, if - 2 - he is, he shall not be released on bail,(iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v)that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)