IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10639 of 2010 1. Raghunandan Singh, S/O Late Radha Singh, R/O Village Purainia, P.O. Peoro, P.S. Bihata District- Patna, Retired National Discipline Scheme Instructor Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Art, Culture And Youth Department,Govt. Of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Art, Culture And Youth Department,Govt. Of Bihar,Vikash Bhawan,Patna. 3. The Director (Youth Welfare) Cum Joint Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar,Vikash Bhawan,Patna. 4. The District Education Officer,Patna. ---------------------------------- 3. 05.12.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. Despite filing of the writ application as far back as 5.7.2010 after serving two copies in the office of the Advocate General and grant of further adjournment for the purpose on 4.11.2011 no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents. In the nature of the claim made from the materials on record the Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter further. The petitioner is stated to have superannuated on 31.1.1999. It is submitted that recently on 2.12.2009 the respondents have granted him first and second time bound promotion with effect from 1.4.1981 and 23.9.1988 respectively when his name figures at serial 65 of the list of persons so granted promotion, but the actual monetary benefit of the arrears of salary plus revision of pension consequently all remain elusive. Counsel for the State submits that the order for promotion dated 2.12.2009 itself contains certain riders in accordance with which payments have to be made. The Court finds that the letter dated 24.12.2010 is only in pursuance of the order dated 2.12.2009. 2 In absence of any challenge to the order dated 2.12.2009 let the respondents now consider the grievances of the petitioner for grant of actual consequential benefits in accordance with their own decision within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. Needless to state that if the respondents find justification in the claim or in any part of the claim necessary consequential orders and revision of pension shall all be issued simultaneously. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)