IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.41 of 2005 NILIMA SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04/ 21.07.2008 This review application has been filed by the petitioner for review of the order dated 12.7.2004 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5889 of 2003. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the said order it was wrongly recorded that the mother of the petitioner had received salary from 1.6.1997 to 23.1.1999. The fact is that she did not receive any salary of the period as she had applied for voluntary retirement with effect from 1.6.1997. It is recorded in the order that the request of the mother of the petitioner for her voluntary retirement was not accepted and she died in harness on 23.1.1999. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since she had not received salary for the period from 1.6.1997 to 23.1.1999, the date on which she died in harness she was also entitled for the salary for the period which she did not get. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate from the records of the case that in fact, the mother of the petitioner had not received salary from 1.6.1997 to 23.1.1999. As such, it is not possible for this Court to allow the review application of the petitioner. However, it is made clear that the petitioner will be at liberty to raise the claim for salary of the period of her mother, if she is able to demonstrate before the authorities on the basis of unimpeachable documents that she had not received salary for the period and in that case the order dated 12.7.2004 observing that she had received the salary of the period shall not come in her way. With the above observations, this review application is disposed of. DKS/ (J.N.Singh,J)