IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No: 14698 of 2004 Between: M.V. Subba Raju S/o. M. Rama Raju Flat No. 301, Mahita Apartments, Opp. K.P.H.B. Colony Kukatpally, Hyderabad 500 072. ..... PETITIONER AND A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., 3-5-891, Tourism House, Himayathanagar, HYderabad 500 029, rep. by its M.D. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the proceedings No. TDC/999/P1/Admn/96-04 dt. 3.8.2004 as illegal, arbitrary and beyond the powers vested and consequently set aside the same. sCounsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent: MR.NANDIGAM KRISHANA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for both the parties. Sri N.Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation, contended that the impugned proceedings No.TDC/999/P1/Admn/96-04, dated 03.08.2004, have been passed in pursuance of the review petition filed by the petitioner. If the petitioner is not at all interested in the review of his earlier order, the order of de novo enquiry will be withdrawn. Sri B.Shiva Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the petitioner is ready to withdraw the review petition filed by him. The statements of the learned counsel for the parties have been recorded. The de novo enquiry was ordered under the impugned proceedings basing on the review petition filed by the petitioner. As the review petition stands withdrawn, on instructions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the question of conducting de novo enquiry does not arise. Hence, the writ petition is closed. _________________ 07.12.2004 Jsu To 1. The Managing Director, A.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., 3-5-891, Tourism House, Himayathanagar, HYderabad 500 029. 2 2 CD copies. nd the same statements of the learned counsel for the parties have been recorded as the denovo enquity is ordered according to the reaponsent basing on the review applications and the review applications have been stands withdrawn by the petitioner on instructions by the learned counsel, the question of conducting denovo enquiry does not arise.