1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9923 OF 2009 Shri Surendra M. Gudge ...Petitioner. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.A.V.Anturkar with Sugandh B. Deshmukh, advs. For the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.R.Page, adv. for the Respondent No.4. Mr.Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh, adv. for the Respondent No.5. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 17th December , 2009 P.C. 1 Grievance of the petitioner is that his unsuccessful application for the licence and that the respondent no.5 was granted licence subject to the respondent no.5 purchasing land for the access of the road. There is no dispute that the access road has been constructed. Contention of the petitioner is that that road is constructed if the land is purchased and not otherwise and it will be violative of condition no.5 of the licence. 2 Respondent/Corporation has filed affidavit. In our opinion, issue as to whether condition of purchase is binding or not is for the 2 respondent no.4 to decide. Petitioner has no right on this count. In our opinion, this would not be fit case for us to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction. However, if the petitioner wants to make representation, he may do so to the respondent no.4 and respondent no.4 to consider. 3 With these observations, petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)