IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 26319 of 1999 Between: K. Ramulu S/o. Bhoomaiah R/o. H.No. 1-2-457, Rakasipet, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Member-Convenor, District Selection Committee/ District Educational Officer, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 3 The District Collector/Chairman District Selection Committee Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 4 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 5 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 6 The Registrar, A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. Respondent No.2 not Necessary. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned Judgment in O.A.No.1720/98 and batch dated 1-10-1999 and quash the same and consequently declare that the Petitioner is entitled for selection and appointment to the post of Hindi Pandit Gr.II in Nizamabad District on the basis of his performance in written test and oral interview and pass such other further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri Justice GHULAM MOHAMMED) When the matter was called on 27.1.2009 none appeared and there was also no representation. Hence the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ______________________________ SANJAY KUMAR , J Dt. 28.01.2009 KA ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Member-Convenor, District Selection Committee/ District Educational Officer, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 2 The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 3 The District Collector/Chairman District Selection Committee Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 4 The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 5 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 6 The Registrar, A.P.Administrative Tribunal, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. Respondent No.2 not Necessary. 7. 2 CCs to G.P. for Education , High Court of A.P. Buildings, Hyderabad OUT. 8. 2 CD copies