IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 3795 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.364/2008 OF KONDOTTY POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 4 AND OTHERS ------------------------------------------------------ 1. THAYYIL MOIDEEN HAJI, AGED 60, S/O. MAMMY, RAHMATH MANZIL, KARIPPURAM, PUTHUKODE.P.O. 2. FATHIMAKUTTY, W/O. THAYYIL MOIDEEN HAJI, RAHMATH MANZIL, KARIPPURAM, PUTHUKODE.P.O. 3. THAYIIL SAKKEENA, AGED 22, D/O. THAYYIL MOIDEEN HAJI, RAHMATH MANZIL, KARIPPURAM, PUTHUKODE.P.O, 4. MOHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, S/O. MAMMY, PADRIYA MANZIL, KARIPPURAM, PUTHUCODE.P.O. 5. FATHIMAKUTTY KUDUKKAN, W/O. MOHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, BADRIYA MANZIL, KARIPPURAM, PUTHUCODE.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT: /STATE ----------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE S.I OF POLICE, KONDOTTY POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No. 3795 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008 O R D E R Application for anticipatory bail. 2. Petitioners are implicated for offences under sections 498A read with section 34 IPC. First accused is the husband of the defacto- complainant and petitioners 1 to 5 are the close relatives of the 1st accused. They allegedly harassed the defacto-complainant on the date of the marriage itself demanding dowry, is the allegation. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the date of the marriage itself the defacto- complainant started exhibiting some mental abnormality in behaviour and she was taken to doctor. A medical certificate is also handed over for perusal. The marriage was on 15-5-2008 and the complaint is filed on 2-6- 2008, within few days of the date of the marriage. The 1st accused is granted bail. 3. On hearing both sides I find that the anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners and the following order is passed:- Petitioners shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- each with solvent sureties each for the BA 3795/08 -2- like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on condition that they will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed by him and shall co-operate with the investigation. The application is allowed as above. K. HEMA, JUDGE. mn.