IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 26TH BHADRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 197 of 2008(S) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.28163/2004 .................... PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. B.THANKAPPAN, OPERATOR SECTION NO.2, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY ALLEPPEY 2. C.R.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, OPERATOR SECTION NO.2, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALLEPPEY 3. SARASWATHY AMMA, REPRESENTING P.K.VASUDEVAN NAIR, OPERATOR, SECTION NO.2, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY ALLEPPEY 4. P.G.MURALEEDHARAN, OPERATOR, SECTION NO.2, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY ALLEPPEY. 5. A.BABU, OPERATOR , P.H.SECTION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALLEPPEY. 6. P.V.VARGHESE, OPERATOR , P.H.SECTION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALLEPPEY. 7. K.SOMAN, OPERATOR P.H.SECTION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY , ALLEPPEY. 8. SUSEELA, REPRESENTING N.CHANDRAN OPERATOR, P.H.SECTION KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALLEPPEY. 9. MOLLY, REPRESENTING V.K.IYPE OPERATOR, P.H.SECTION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, ALLEPPEY. BY ADV. SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR SMT.CHINCY GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENT: --------------------- SURESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 53, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN AT PRESENT TO PETITIONERS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, , KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.J.KRISHNA KUMAR, SC, KWA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & A.K. BASHEER, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.O.C. No. 197 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of September, 2008 Judgment H.L. Dattu, C. J: Inter alia alleging non implementation of the orders passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.28163/2004 dated 14th June 2007, petitioners in the writ petition have filed this Contempt Petition. 2. Notice of this Contempt Petition was ordered to be issued and served on the respondent. He has entered appearance through learned counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent brings to our notice that the respondent being aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.28163/2004 dated 14th June 2007 has already preferred an appeal, W.A.No.1434 of 2008 , and the same is pending consideration. 4. In view of this development, in our opinion, at this stage we need not have to take cognizance of the Contempt Petition filed by the petitioners. Accordingly we pass the following: Order i) Contempt Petition is disposed of as unnecessary, for the present. ii) Liberty is reserved to the complainants to approach this Court, if need arises in future. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU Chief Justice A.K. BASHEER Judge an.