IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.10215 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.R.S.Datar for the appellant. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. By consent taken up for final hearing. 2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 14.3.2005 in Writ Petition No.7258 of 2003. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that certain directions have been issued in paragraph 5 of the impugned order and issuance of these directions are not be possible under Article 226 of the Constitution. The fact that the School Tribunal is subordinate to this Court cannot be disputed. The power of superintendence which this court has under Article 227 is to issue directions and to meet the ends of justice. Such powers cannot be said to have been restricted to Article 226 of the Constitution of India. That being the position the impugned order is one under Article 227 of the Constitution. The appeal against such order is not tenable hence the appeal is dismissed. ...