IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10296 of 2011 ==================================================== RAJNANDAN SINGH & ORS - Petitioner/s(s) Versus DEVANAND SINGH & ANR - Respondent/s(s) ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. REWTI KANT RAMAN For the Respondent/s: Mr. ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO DATE: 04-07-2011 ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO) _________ 2. 04.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 7.2.2011 passed by Munsif, Jehanabad in Title Suit No. 53 of 1993 whereby the court below rejected the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the petitioner on 21.1.2011. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in fact the plaintiff filed amendment application (Annexure 1) on 11.1.2011 which was allowed by the court below and, therefore, the right accrued to the defendant to file written statement in reply to the said amendment application. The learned counsel further 2 submitted that Annexure 2 the application was filed by the defendant petitioner has been rejected. From perusal of the Annexure 2 it appears that the application for time was field by the defendant petitioner before the court below which has been rejected. Further it appears that Schedule 2 property was added in the plaint as far back as in the year 2002. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the defendant was directed to file written statement with regard to the amendment allowed but since last nine years no step was taken. On 21.1.2011 also a time application has been filed praying for one month’s time. This application has been rejected by the impugned order. Therefore, in my opinion, it is not at all a case where supervisory jurisdiction should be exercised because the learned court below has not acted outside his jurisdiction. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)