- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT No. 165 OF 1999 Dena Bank ... Plaintiff Vs. GMS Industries (I) Ltd. ... Defendant Mr. P. N. Singh i/b M/s. Vyas & Bhalwal, for the Plaintiff. None for Defendant. CORAM : S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : JULY 22, 2009. PC :- 1. This is a usual bank suit to recover a sum of Rs.2,68,789/- together with interest at the rate of 19.75 per cent per annum. 2. On the request of the defendant, the plaintiff granted it temporary over-draft facility upto limit of Rs.2,50,000/-. In respect thereof, defendant executed a demand promissory note and a letter of continuity. 3. In respect of the said facility, the plaintiff has maintained an account of the defendant. A compilation of documents is tendered by the plaintiff. The same is taken on record and marked “A” (Colly). 4. There is no written-statement. The documents on record clearly establish the plaintiff’s case. There is nothing on record which militates against it. Moreover, in the facts of this case, I see no reason to refuse to accept the averments made in the plaint as correct. 5. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed.