B m h 5 a wm N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BxLAqp (c ) G _ RIT wzwo/y ' O F 20 10 R‘nia iv‘ ‘ Lt A P Shit g bt' ae . . rva'sava,‘ aed aou ears, resen workin on th Disric aja Bee a imie .Dt . pst AOutnt o ccna anae i Krish kas’V hamari .(jc.G.) Nigm a VSUS ER RS ESPONDENT ate of Chhattlsgarh Trou ecrear eparment .. Sty, Dt of riiur ‘ e anag g irector C G Ra ee va ias ia imite ee awan" aVIgra et enera aria Establis The .. aa ee vamKrisi ias a. ime Be wa avig’ra ur’ . aendraa Son of B'. . Lad Distrc antewa , OG RaJya Be Nlgam antewaasrictBas ris aged ‘As’sistn’t a Sale / anag I uR W APPEAL No. I 3 31, T /ohafKnt SHrastavaSon of APPELLANT 48 y Ptly g e (tt . Ry j EVm Ltd, of '-' Mgr) St hgh i i The ,Agcute, Raipur (C.G.). DKS. Bhawan, Th M D, jya B] Em Krishi Vk Ngm Ld “BJ Bh Rm, Tehbandha Raipur (C G ) DPUY Gl M'gQér: hment," CG Rjy Bj Eh Vk Nigm Litd, I “ej Bhan”, Rm, TelibandhajRaip (CG.). l, RjLkda R ka, 34 years, (it Dd ) e Khl Vikas DdKDitt ' M/e’r :z N / b: HIGH COURT OF'cHHATTISGARH ‘A'r BILASPUR DIVISION BENGH- ‘ HON BLE SHRI l M QLIDDUSI & I ‘HON’BLE s‘HRI PRASHANT KLIMAR MISHRA,JJ: WRIT APPEAL No.92 OF 2010‘ ‘ r hek Sharma Advocate for the M Ablsh M Vlnay Harlt Dy dvcat enera With Miss Deeall Pandeg r Aoe Gl p y PaneI Lawyer for the State - P p ) 1. ' wt as ee th or t 0 d ry a ‘ e h o an p th h a cn e Ray E a e Dhm . No doubt that t raer Is one of the eXIgencIes of serVIe and 4 he tnsf c f ran h n re e tr Ter we ot d o to te t g rr b t arne g dge. Aorg h writ pe is dismi. Hwr is x t o wri oul nt i I the tsfer Is made In the public Interest te Courts canot v ' Interfe In the sam though they may be frequent ransfes herfoe. do n fin any god ground Inrfere With he imouned ode passed y he; led Sinle Ju 5. ccdinly, te apal ssed oeve dsmisal of xg' his appeal r t petition wd o debar the petitoner I’ appellant to approach the authority concerned by moving representatioh mentioning his grievances. . I URAL JUDGMENT (assed on 21 Si Aril 2010 l.M. QU‘ddusi J; Heard 2. This ri appeal h bn flied against e der daed 9 4 210 passe In W P (S) No 1568110 wheeb the lerned Single Judg has dismissed te writ petitin 3; The writ petition was filed gaist the Imugned order of e” transfer of te petltloner/appellant herein who was posted s Acountat under th C G ra Bee} vam Krlshl Vlkas Nlgm‘ Limitd atarl Appella‘ntl Rohani Kant Shrlvastava I Petitiorler I L > Vs i I Résporldents ‘State of C.G & others Present 6. Certified copy as per rules. ii Sd/- y Sdl- I ‘o ‘ I.M.Quddusi Prashant Kumar Mlshral Judge Roshan/i":