IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2008 / 25TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 30637 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.M.SHABEER, S/O.ABDULLA, PALTHODIKA HOUSE, PARUMBALAM.P.O, ANAKAYAM, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 2. AKBAR ALI, S/O.UNNI MUHAMMED HAJI, MOORKAN HOUSE, ASHOKA ROAD, MAMBAD P.O, MALAPPURAM. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).30637/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 17th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Second respondent is the registered owner of a stage carriage covered with a regular permit. He has sought for revision of his own timings and his application was directed to be considered by this Court under Ext.P2 judgment. Petitioner submits that he would be aggrieved by the revision as sought for by the second respondent and has filed objections in this regard as per Ext.P3. Relief sought for by the petitioner is a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 also, in the course of settlement of timings as prayed in Ext.P2. Having heard learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 objection also, if the same has been received, in the course of considering the request for revision of timings as sought for by the second respondent pursuant to the directions issued in Ext.P2 judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs