IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2011 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1932 OP(C).No. 1056 of 2011(O) ------------------------- OS.334/2006 of IST ADDL.SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONERS: ------------------------- 1. NAZEER, AGED 41, S/O.HAMEED, RAZIA MANZIL, VATTEKATTU ROAD, KATHRIKADAVU, KALOOR, KOCHI. 2. NAVAS, AGED 39, S/O.HAMEED, RAZIA MANZIL, VATTEKATTU ROAD, KATHRIKADAVU, KALOOR, KOCHI. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR, SRI.P.SAM ZACHARIAH. RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------------- RAZIA, AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.MUHAMMED RAFFI, RAFEEK MANZIL, NADUVATH NAGAR (PO), CHERTHALA - 688 559. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O.P.(Civil). No. 1056 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 22.2.2011 in I.A. 1206 of 2011 in O.S.334 of 2006. By the said order, the court below received additional pleadings, though objection was raised by the defendants, who are the petitioners herein. The court has observed that the additional pleadings filed by the plaintiff are to explain some of the contentions taken by the defendants in their written statement. 2. The grievance of the petitioners before this court is that it was without giving an opportunity to the petitioners to controvert the allegations in the replication that it was received. 3. All that the court below has done is to receive the additional pleadings. Nothing prevented the petitioners from filing additional written statement. O.P.(C).1056/2011. 2 There is no reason to believe that the court below will not permit the petitioners to raise additional pleadings. This petition is disposed of reserving the liberty of the petitioners to do so. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.