1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.331 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3274 OF 2007 Shri Sai Samarth Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (Through its Secretary) and another ... Appellants Vs. Mrs. Sheela Nana Jadhav @ Sheela Balu Devkar and others. ... Respondents Mr. S.S. Shah for the appellants. Ms. Deepali Patil for the respondent No.1. Mr. Deepak Dongre for the respondent No.3. Mr. R.P. Behere, Additional Government Pleader for the respondent No.2. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 3RD DECEMBER, 2008 P.C.: The appellants by way of this appeal impugn the order dated 30th August, 2007, passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3274 of 2007. 2. At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that in the writ petition, specific ground has been 2 raised that the teacher was not a permanent employee of the Management in as much as no such appointment was factually made and furthermore, had not completed a period of three years which was pre-requisite for being permanent employee. Therefore, she was a temporary employee and not a permanent employee so as to enable her to receive the benefit of permanent employee and period of abandonment of service of temporary employee was three years. It is further stated that this issue was argued before the learned Single Judge. However, same has not been considered in the impugned judgment. This is factually not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. 3. In these circumstances, we dispose of this appeal with liberty to the appellants to make a mention by taking out a proper application before the learned Single Judge for appropriate orders. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J.