IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4762 of 2010 KESHARI CHAND BHAGAT SON OF LATE TARA CHAND BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURZAPUR, P.S. BASETHA, DISTRICT- ARARIA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT MAMTA APARTMENT, 402, SHIVPURI, P.S. KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PANTA 3. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PANTA 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (CIVIL) PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PANTA 5. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF-CUM-SPECIAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 2 18.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st January, 2008 some of the retiral dues have been paid, however, still 10 % of the pension which was withheld as stated in the letter contained in memo no. 55 dated 12th February, 2009 has not been sanctioned as yet even though the petitioner was acquitted in the vigilance case as per the judgement dated 16.08.2005 as stated in paragraph 11 of the writ application as also the claim for grant of second assured career progression. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the - 2 - pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.2 with a copy to the respondent no.5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest, if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)