HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR Contemp^CaselOJNo. 317 of 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS Smt. Amita Bai Lakhe, wife of Cain Lal Kasar, aed about 54 years, R/o B/57, Kota Colony, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G) through Power of Attorney Holder Chain Lal Kasar, S/o Gulab Chand Kasar, aged about 63 years, R/o B/57, Kota Colony, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G). Vs. S.J. Singh Gautam, S/o Vijay Bahadur Singh Gautam, aged about 55 years, R/o behind Doctor Dhillon's Clinic, Station Road - Durg (C.G). B.L. Agrawal, Former Regional Transport Authority Raipur (C.G) at present working as Secretary Departn-ient of Agriculture, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G). CONTEMPT PETITIQN UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COUJRTS ACTL AND UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA APPEARANCE: Petitioner Smt. Amita Bai Lakhe, through her Husband and Power of Attorney Holder, Chain Lal Kasar ORDER (18.11.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heard on admission. Petitioner Smt. Amita Bai Lakhe has filed this petition for ihitiation of proceedings of contempt against the respondents on the grounci that respondent no.l furnished wrong information before this .//'' ^' ^ Contempt Petition © Na317/2009 Court in W.P(C). No. 271/2009 that an application for grant ofpermit dated 29.7.2008 (Annexure P-1 of the writ petition) was pending consideration whereas no such application was pending before the concerned RTA, therefore, conteinpt proceedings be drawn against the respondents. Annexure C-6 is the copy of the order dated 26th of February 2009 by which the concerned RTA has disposed of the application filed by respondent no.l and has dismissed the same holding that no relief can be granted as prayed in the said application. A perusal of contents of para-1 of the Order would show that the concemed authority has observed that respondent no.l has paid the prescribed fee on 09.07.2008 and has submitted the application in the office on 22.01.2009. Admittedly, no application dated 29.7.2008 was pending before the RTA but the fee of the application was paid on 09.7.2008 and later on the application was presented in the office on 22.01.2009. Since there was a direction of this Court to decide the application within two weeks frora the date of receipt of copy of the order dated 19.01.2009 passed in the writ petition the RTA has disposed of the said application and has dismissed the same^ I do not deem it appropriate to proceed in the matter of contempt. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. . Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao