IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 503 OF 2011 SHRI. CAETANO REMEDIO DOURADO AND 4 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. OLINDA DOURADO AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 17th August, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, learned Advocate for the petitioners. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners take exception to order dated 8.12.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division "E'Court, Margao in Regular Civil Suit No.242/2009/E by which an application filed by the petitioners who are defendants nos. 1 to 5 in the suit seeking police protection for themselves and for the commissioner has been rejected. 3. Mr. Usgaonkar has placed reliance upon the earlier order dated 30.7.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 43/2010 and submitted that the only remedy available to the petitioners in order to go to his own property with a commissioner is to get police protection from the Court in a suit pending against them. 4. In my considered opinion observations made in the order dated 30.7.2011 by the learned Single Judge of this Court do not lay down any law as such and that the same have to be treated as only observations made in the context of submissions made on behalf of the petitioners therein. 5. In my considered opinion no fault can be found with the trial Court in rejecting the application. I do not find any jurisdictional error having been committed by the trial Court. Hence the petition is dismissed. 6. Needless to mention that passing of this Order will not come in the way of the petitioners from seeking any other appropriate remedy if available in law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn