IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-37416 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: May 04, 2011 Sandeep @ Kala …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under sections 379/328/420/467/468/471 IPC vide FIR No.234 dated 22.7.2010 at police station Sohna, District Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner is in custody since 14.8.2010, material prosecution witnesses have already been examined and thus, no useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody any longer. According to him, only allegation against the petitioner is that he was found in possession of a stolen vehicle. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that allegations against the petitioner are serious. He, however, does not dispute the period of Crl.Misc.No.M-37416 of 2010 - 2 - incarceration of petitioner and number of prosecution witnesses examined till now. Keeping in view the aforesaid contentions, period of incarceration and the fact that trial may still take some time to conclude, I am of the considered view that petitioner is entitled to concession of bail. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Gurgaon. Disposed of. May 04, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2