1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAZ) No. 568 of 2010 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 268 of 2009 in Writ Petition No. 5413 of 20098 (d) Ku. Jaimala Bhaurao Ramteke ...VERSUS.. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Nagpur. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- Ms. S.O.Tapadia, Adv. H/f H/f Mr. V.M.Deshpande, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. V.N.Patre, Advocate for Respondent no.2 Mr. A.S.Fulzele, A.G.P. for Respondent No.3 C ORAM : D.B.BHOSALE ; and PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 12th August, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. By this civil application, the applicant has prayed for speaking to minutes in respect of the order dated 21/7/2010 passed in L.P.A. No. 268 of 2009. Learned counsel for the applicant has invited our attention to paragraph 5 of the order and submitted that instead of ‘Scheduled Tribe category’, it may be corrected as ‘Scheduled Caste category’. Accordingly, in paragraph 5, the words “Scheduled Tribe category” be read as “Scheduled Caste category”. The civil application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale