-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1912 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL [ ST.] NO. 14882 OF 2010 Sou. Sunita D. Surjan. ..Appellant. Versus Rajaram R. Patne and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. S. P. Thorat for the appellant. Mr. Harshad Sate for R-1 to 5. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : July 1, 2011. P. C. : 1. This civil application is taken out for restoration of second appeal. Prayer for condonation of delay of 39 days, which has occurred in filing the civil application, is also made. In paragraph nos. 4 to 9 of civil application, the applicant has given reasons for the delay caused in filing present civil application. I find that the explanation is satisfactory and therefore delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, delay is condoned. 2. The applicant has also explained the circumstances in which second appeal was dismissed for non prosecution. Basically, appeal was dismissed for non removal of office objections. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to remove the office srp -: 2 :- objections within four weeks from today. In the light of explanation given by the appellant and undertaking given by the learned advocate, I am inclined to restore the second appeal. Hence, second appeal is restored to file. 3. Civil application stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)