)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 205 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PREMILABEN VINODCHANDRA THAKER Versus VINODCHANDRA BALKRUSHNA THAKER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MRS DT SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR DHARMESH V SHAH for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 23/10/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. It is not in dispute that the respondent was previously paying interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.1200/- in H.M.P. proceedings. In the circumstances, the figure of Rs.1200/- is ordered to be substituted for Rs.1000/- in the impugned order dated 20th October, 1999 made by the City Civil Court below Exh.5 in H.M.P. No.2491 of 1998. This is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties in the main matter. Rule made absolute accordingly. The respondent shall pay the arrears within two months. It is stated at the bar that the proceedings have now been transferred to the Family Court, Ahmedabad. The Family Court, Ahmedabad may give priority to the disposal of the proceedings on the basis that the original proceedings were filed in the year 1996. Writ may be sent to Court No.4, Family Court, Ahmedabad in Case No.555 of 2001. ******* hki