IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34893 of 2007 SATYENDRA KUMAR PANDEY & ANR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8 11.2.2009 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. Reference may be made to the earlier order of this Court dated 14.5.2008. Pursuant thereto, a report has been received which is at Flag-B. In view of the report, it becomes clear that the petitioner had made a misleading statement in this application that he was granted bail by the court below after complying the order of this Court dated 6.4.2007 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15276 of 2007. As a matter of fact, it is the petitioner who has successfully evaded arrest in the present case despite rejection of their prayer for anticipatory bail both by the sessions court and this Court. If that be so, the petitioner cannot make a grievance with regard to the non-submission of the charge-sheet or taking cognizance. Be that as it may, in the report in hand at Flag-B, the court below has also reported that a charge-sheet has also been submitted and cognizance for the offences alleged against the petitioner has also been taken. That being so, the prayer in this application has become academic and in fact infructuous. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)