IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2010 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9264 of 2010(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- G.SURENDRAN, HEAD CLERK, OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY SMT.MERIL MUTHU P.JOHN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, O/O.DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, O/O.DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI ANTONY MUKKATH R1 to R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - W.P.(C) No. 9264 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Head Clerk in Ottasekharamangalam Grama Panchayat. Feeling aggrieved by Ext.P1 draft transfer list, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 objection. The apprehension of the petitioner is that the respondents would finalise Ext.P1 without considering Ext.P4. A perusal of Ext.P1 would reveal that the respondents themselves invited for objections from aggrieved employees. Therefore, there cannot be any reason for such an apprehension. However, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 before finalising Ext.P1, in case it is not already finalised. Sd/- (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge