IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36676 of 2008 ANIL KUMAR SETH @ ANIL SETH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12.11.2008 Heard. Petitioner Anil Kumar Seth @ Anil Seth appears to be the husband of Pramukh of the Block. The allegation is that Pramukh started abusing the informant who is the Block Development Officer of the Block while others surrounded him. During that course, the allegation is that this petitioner who was armed with Chhura, dealt blow upon the head and chest of the informant causing injuries to the informant. The injuries as mentioned in Paragraph-22 of the Case diary show sharp cutting injuries 5” X 2” X1/2” and 41/2” X 21/2” X 1” on the head and chest respectively of the informant. Contention is that initially the case was registered under Section 307 IPC, but the Police came top the conclusion that it could be a case under Section 326 IPC. Further contention is that the lady Pramukh has filed a complaint that the informant misbehaved with her and further that the informant appears to have created a different story so as to counter-blast the complaint petition. Be that as it may, the informant being an extra constitutional authority, who was holding a meeting appearing in the form of regularity, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected. SKBOSE (Dharnidhar Jha)