c- ^- - ^ e( IN THE JHIGH COVRT OF 0»IATTTSG^fia AT BlLASPUIt W.R.^No. , ^3^f) of 2011 / Pmm Chaod Ram, aged about 45 years S/o Late Shri Tapeshwar Ranci, Resident of i\\."'"< Primary School Belkamar^ Block- 1,.-"" .^"'...<" Khad^aon, Distt- Korea. (00). .^•'< ^ .^~ PETITIQNER; )\>- ^^:' ^""'^yy^"\^- e^y ^: VE.R.S.US ^ ^ RESPONDENTS;, L State of OG. Through: The Secretacy, Departaieiit of Tribal welfare., D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.O). ^ 2. Commissioner, Departnient of Tribal welfare, .District -Korea, (C.G.).. ^3.... .AssistaQt.CeMxsmissiemer^ Department of Tribal welfare, District- K-Qrea,(C.G.). 4. Block Educatioji ofGcer, Khadganwan, Distrkt- KLorea. (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION_UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TIffi CONSTnUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSITANCE OE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF .MANDAMUS CERTIORARI. PRDHIBniQN,..ASP i'OIt QTHER SUCTABLE WRCT^lQS-, WIIITS QRDEBPR ORDERSDB^CTION QRMRECTION^ ^^ HIGHCOURT OrCHHAtTBB®ARHAT BILA8PUR SB : HQN*BLBMR. JU8TICB PRITINKBRDIWAK®ft W.P.fSt.NO. 5390/2011 PBTITIONBR PremChandRam versus RBSPONDBNT8 State of C. G. & Others Shri R.K.Jaiswal^ counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Sin^i Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 @P THB eONSTIT^TIOII Oy IHDIA ORDBR (14.09.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the pres^nt petition is that the petitioner has not been paid salaxy frora the month ofAu^ist 2010 to June 2011 though he is performing his duty on the post of Headmaster. Shri Jaiswal submits that the petittoner has made representation (Annexure P/2) on 20.7.2011 but till date nothing has been done. State counsel points out that on 20.7.2011 tiie p^titioner has made representation and has ruahed to this Court immediately without waiting for sufficient period. He however submits that this petition can be diaposed of by giving direction to the competent authority to consider the representation of the petitioner and to pass approproaite arder. In the facts and circumstances ©fthe case, lookiag to the nature of dispute involved in the present petition, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to file a fresh representation within two weeks from today before resp. No.4 and in tum the said authority wMl paas appnopriate order within a period of one month from the date of making of the representation. The petitioner is also directed to apprise the resp. N©.2and 3 about his grievance and it is expected from them also to take c^re of the c^Be. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at Uberty to decide the representation strictly in aocordance wifh law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge