IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1436 of 2010 1. SUDHA SINHA W/O PREM PRAKASH SINHA R/O VILLAGE (M) BUDHA COLONY, BEHIND B.D.PUBLIC SCHOOL, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, DISTT.- PATNA 2. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA S/O SHRI ASHUTOSH VERMA R/O VILLAGE (M) BUDHA COLONY, BEHIND B.D.PUBLIC SCHOOL, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, DISTT.- PATNA 3. ARADHANA SINHA W/O ANUP KUMAR R/O VILLAGE (M) BUDHA COLONY, BEHIND B.D.PUBLIC SCHOOL, P.S.- BUDHA COLONY, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI JITENDRA KUMAR, THE COLLECTOR, PATNA 3. SRI SUSIL KUMAR S/O NOT KNOWN THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, PATNA SADAR, DISTT.- PATNA 4. SRI MAKSUD ANSARI, THE CIRCLE OFFICER, PATNA SADAR, DISTT.- PATNA 5. RANJAN KUMAR ROY S/O NAGENDRA RAI R/O MOHALLA- NORTH MANDIRI, P.S. BUDHA COLONY, DISTT.- PATNA 6. MANORANJAN ROY S/O NAGENDRA RAI R/O MOHALLA- NORTH MANDIRI, P.S. BUDHA COLONY, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 03. 06.04.2011 In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 20.11.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.7324 of 2009, Annexure-1/1 the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Patna Sadar deputed Amin for measuring plot nos.518, 618 of village Dujara, Budha Colony, Patna. Having measured the aforesaid two plots the Amin submitted report dated 4.3.2010, in the light whereof the D.C.L.R. passed order dated 2.4.2010. Both the report of the Amin and the order of the D.C.L.R. are annexed with the show cause as Annexures-A and B. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners 2 that the measurement was taken by the Amin behind the back of the petitioner, as such, could not have been relied upon by the D.C.L.R. for passing order dated 2.4.2010. Let petitioners challenge the report of the Amin dated 4.3.2010 as also the order of the D.C.L.R., Patna Sadar dated 2.4.2010, Annexures-A, B by taking appropriate proceeding before the Collector, Patna in accordance with law. The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)