1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2671 OF 2007 Rashtrawadi Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union .. Petitioner. Versus Security Guards Bord for Greater Bombay & Thane District & Ors. .. Respondents. WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2672 OF 2007 Sangeeta G. Waghmare .. Petitioner Versus Security Guards Bord for Greater Bombay & Thane District & Ors. .. Respondents. Ms.R.J. Todankar for the petitioner. Mr.M.S. Topkar for respondent No.1. Mr.B.K. Ashok i/by Bekay Legal for respondent No.3. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 29th January, 2008 DATED : 29th January, 2008 DATED : 29th January, 2008 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly state that the above writ petitions are squarely covered on fact and law by two Division Bench judgments of this Court in the cases of (i) Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi V/s. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Others (O.S. Writ Petition No.563/07) decided on 21-6-2007 and (ii) Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union V/s. Pune District Security Guards Boards and others (A.S. Writ Petition 2 No.1972/05) decided on 27-9-2007. 2. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of in terms thereof. The parties would take steps and the Board would act according to the directions contained in both the judgments. Liberty to the parties to raise all pleas before the Board. We further make it clear that the period prescribed under those orders shall operate from today. 3. With these observations, both the writ petitions are disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.