. z Wf g» £3,«v’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. A163 [2006 PETITIONER f, Dayal @ Dallu, S/o. Shobhnath, m Aged about 50 years, R/o. 4M. ‘1’ Rajbandha Talab, Raipur, Tahsil & XIWw I. District Raipur (C.G). \ \ W a; Q VERSUS ..... Mxdx RESPONDENTS 1. state of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Urban Administration,Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 12. Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through, Commissioner / Zone Executive Officer. / 3. The Coilector, Raipur. The Authorised Officer, Under Act 15 of 1984, Through Collector, XI—HC-78 EW,WW,W WW” w P 9zéQ m 200$ WEHIW WWW wwwm WW§WW éawm - WW(W> 14—8‘2006 Mr. Ashok Soni, counsel far fhx Mr. N.K. Agrawal: Depufy Adm No.1 & 3. Heard bofh fhe counsei. Main grievance of Ar‘ricle 226/227 cf The Consfifufion o a plo‘l' on 3O years’ lease admeasuring 21 sq. m‘rrs. and since Then the pe'm-ioner is in possession of 1'h plot Now, respondent No.2 has given nofice Annexure P-1 fo fhe pefifione for vacating ihe said plo‘i on fhe ground fha‘i' fhe some is required for widenin of The road and aiTernaTive arrangemeni' has been made in Kabir Nagar. Heera ur. OTher persons namely; LaHa Khan and anoTher, who were also alloTTed pl ,T under The same scheme, filed WP. No.2515/2005 and wiTh The consenT of The parTies. order was passed in The said wriT peTiTion by This CourT ThaT fTer giving opporfunii‘y of hearing To The pefH-ioners, The Corporafion f0 Take d pision. Learned counsel for The peTi ioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner was alloTTed The ploT being a landless poor person and now respondenT No.2 wanTs T‘o ng The due process of law. He furTher submiTs ThaT Therefore, as The pres nT peTiTioner is similarsiTuaTed persong and he is also on The same fooTing s ThaT of Lalla Khan, Therefore, similar order as has been passed in W.P.No. 515f2005 may be passed so ThaT all The cases will be decided fogefher. fhé pefifioner raised in fhis wri‘I' pefi'fion under f India is Thai fhe pefifioner was allo‘H‘ed under Annexure P-2 bearing plo'r No.102, Hospita! Ward No.15, Rqiabandha Talab, Raip fhrow him from fhe said plof wifh fol ! P.T.O. z pefifioner. mafe Genera! for The 5fafe/responden1‘s u i @ XI-HC—78 E W , W , W mm .LQ3?1.g:—%Q . an; 200$ mW(W> WWW mwifwm WWW mwvi%aw%$ ./_ 2" éamm x The prayer made by learned counsel for The pefifianer' is Just fair and reasonable. Therefore, respondénr No.2 is direcfed To decide The case of fhe pemioner offer affording him pro her opporfunify of hearing. As The cases of simiiarly sifuafed persons are pending before respondenf No.2, ’rherefore, after affording opporfunify 1‘0 The presenf pe‘rifioner also, respondenf No.2 shall decide fhe case of fhevperifioner‘, in accordance wifh law. Till The .opporTuniTy of hearing is afforded To The peTiTioner, he should noT be dispossessed from The house/ploT in quesTion unTil The final order is passed by respondenT No.2. WiTh The direcTions aforesaid, The peTiTion sTands disposed of. ConsequenTly, M.(W.)P.No.3£ 03/2006 sTands disposed of. ParTies are enTiTled for ceri‘ified copy of This order. ‘ Sd/- i L.C. Bhadoo Judge Sonia é” P.T.O.