IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1399 OF 2003 Smt. Usha Devi ..………Petitioner. Versus Union of India and another. ……………..Respondents. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel for the Central Government. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Standing Counsel for the Central Government. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted before this Court that the matter relates to employment on a Civil post in a Military Establishment and the matter is cognizable by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also, in the opinion of this Court, the instant Writ Petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy and the same is dismissed as such. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 14.5.2010 Rathour