IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7998 of 2010 Date of Decision: 4.5.2010 Smt. Sunita and another ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to remove the Dharna and take legal action against the miscreants for not allowing them to run their country made liquor vend for which licence has been granted by the Excise Department, Government of Haryana, for the year April 2010 to March 2011 on deposit of licence fee of Rs.70,15,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have made a representation dated 29.4.2010 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, it appears that the matter can be disposed of at this stage without issuing notice of motion to the respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation (Annexure P- 5) sent by the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as also to respondent No.5. May 4, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE