IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17898 of 2011 Mahendra Ram, S/O Late Sheonandan Ram, R/O Village- Motihari, Police Station- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran. . . . .Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, District Rural Development Agency, West Champaran at Bettiah 6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, West Champaran at Bettiah. 7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran. 8. The Block Development Officer, Narkatiaganj Block, District- West Champaran. 9. The Block Supply Officer, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran. 10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Rakhai Champapur, Block- Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran. . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 24.11.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Narkatiaganj Block, prays for quashing Memo no.512 dated 11.08.2011, whereby he has been directed to refund a sum of Rs.1,26,957/- towards the value of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Scheme. The petitioner submits that the calculation arrived at vide Annexure-1 is faulty. In this respect, the petitioner refers Memo no. 174 dated 15.02.2010 issued by Block Development Officer, Narkatiaganj, wherein total undistributed rice has been shown as 22.94 quintals. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioner is subjected to verification. In my view, the petitioner should file a detailed 2 representation before the Block Development Officer, Narkatiaganj within a period of five weeks from today, who would dispose of the same within a further period of ten weeks. In the meanwhile, the petitioner would deposit the value of 22.94 quintals of rice at the rate of Rs.10/- per kg. within a period of five weeks from today. No coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. This application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)