4.crapl-845-11.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 845 OF 2011 Jasmin Mahendra Vora ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Shri. A.H.H.Ponda Advocate for applicant Shri. A.S.Shitole Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM : B.R.GAVAI, J. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard with consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The main grievance of the applicant in the present application is that the learned trial Court has directly issued non-bailable warrant without issuing bailable warrant. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant shall regularly attend the trial before the trial Court. 3. The order issuing directly non-bailable warrant without issuing bailable warrant is not sustainable in law. 4. Rule is therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [ B.R.GAVAI, J. ] 1