Crl. Misc. No. M-33966 of 2010 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-33966 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 1,2011 Veerpal Kaur and another .................................................. Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ................................................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghubir Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is for directing respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 as the petitioners have performed marriage against the wishes of the aforesaid respondents. A detailed inquiry has been conducted under the orders of Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar. The statements of the petitioners were recorded on 27.12.2010. It is stated that they were now leading a peaceful life as husband and wife and do not apprehend any danger to their lives at Crl. Misc. No. M-33966 of 2010 (O&M) [ 2 ] the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and do not require any security for their protection. Statements of Lakhwinder Singh, respondent No.4, and Major Singh, respondent No.5, have also been recorded by the Assistant Commissioner of Police (North), Jalandhar. They have accepted the marriage of the petitioners and were not interfering in their married life. In view of the reply filed by the State, counsel for the petitioners states that nothing survives in this petition. The petition stands disposed of. 1.2.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE