IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1725 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.1242 OF 2005. Nandkumar Vinayak Deo ... ...... ....Applicant. V/s Divakar Moreshwar Mule & Ors..... ... ....Respondents. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ) Court's or Judge's Orders of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar' s orders. ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.V.Palsuledesai, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.G.S.Godbole, Adv. For respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. 2.8.2007 PC: Heard parties. Vinayak Mahadeo Deo and his son instituted a suit for possession and mesne profits against plaintiff No.1's daughter and son-in-law. Suit came to be decreed. In an appeal preferred by present respondent the First Appellate Court allowed the appeal and decreed 1 the counter claim. Aggrieved thereby present second appeal has been filed which has been admitted. The appellant makes a grievance that relying upon the appellate judgment the respondents have moved application before the various authorities with a view to have their names mutated in place of the names of the appellant and thus seeks stay of direction Nos.4 and 5 issued in the judgment of the First Appellate Court. Hence I grant interim stay to direction Nos. 4 and 5 in the operative part of the judgment of the First Appellate Court. Civil Application stands disposed of. 2.8.07. 2