1 wp 2202.92 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2202 OF 1992 Agrasen Bhavan Trust Jalna .. Petitioner Versus Shahikant Patwari and others .. Respondents Shri S. S. Bora, Advocate h/f Shri S. C. Bora, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 are served. Shri S. B. Deshpande, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 07TH MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner makes statement that the petitioner is not responding. He further submits that, notice was sent to the petitioner by R.P.A.D. However, it is not responding. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioner submits that, appropriate order may be passed in the matter. 2. The counsel for the respondent No. 2 also makes statement 2 wp 2202.92 that not only that his client has not instructed, but he has no brief to argue the matter. In the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 2, there is no option for this Court but to dismiss the petition. The writ petition is dismissed and stands disposed of. The Rule stands discharged. The interim relief stands vacated. [ S. S. SHINDE, J.] bsb/March 11