IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4088 of 2010 1. RAM SURESH SINGH S/O LATE SHANKAR SINGH R/O VILL ATMIGANJ,P.O.MAHDEVA,P.S.NASRIGANJ,DISTT- ROHTAS 2. RAMANAND SINGH S/O LATE BANSRAJ SINGH R/O VILL+P.O.GIDHA,P.S.KOILBAR,DISTT-BHOJPUR 3. DINESH PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE AWADHESH SINGH R/O VILL+P.O+P.S.DARIGAON, DISTT-ROHTAS 4. MD. HAIDAR ALI S/O LATE GULAM RASUL R/O WHITE HOUSE COMPOUND ,ROAD NO.3A,DARUS SALAM CAMPUS,P.S.RAMPUR,DISTT--GAYA 5. RAM SRINGAR SINGH S/O LATE THAKUR DAYAL SINGH R/O VILL KARNAPURA,P.O.+P.S. DURGAWATI,DISTT-KAIMUR 6. SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH S/O LATE BANSIDHAR SINGH R/O VILL BISRAMPUR,P.O.CHOTKI CHENARI,P.S.SHEOSAGAR,DISTT-ROHTAS 7. AYODHYA PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAJDEO SINGH R/O MOH GAJRADH,GAURAKSHANI,SASARAM,ROHTAS 8. DINESH KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE SHEO NARAYAN SINGH R/O VILL TENDUNI KALA,P.O.MURIYAR,P.S.AKHORI GOLA,DISTT- ROHTAS 9. SURENDRA PANDEY S/O SRI RAMNATH PANDEY R/O VILL ROJHAIN,P.O.+P.S.SHEOSAGAR,DISTT- ROHTAS 10. SURESH KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE SURAJ KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL DHAWA,P.O.DURGADIH,P.S.BIKRAMGANJ,DISTT- ROHTAS 11. SATYA NARAYAN SINGH S/O SHRI RAJ KUMAR SINGH R/O VILL MOHANPUR,P.O.+P.S.KARAKATE,DISTT-ROHTAS 12. AZFAR HUSSAIN S/O LATE AZAHAR HUSSAIN R/O MOH MANDAIKESHAR,P.O.+P.S.SASARAM,DISTT- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. SECRETARY,HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,PATNA 3. JOINT SECRETARY,HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,PATNA 4. DIRECTOR ,HIGHER EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR,PATNA 2 5. VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY ARRAH THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR 6. THE VICE CHANCELLOR ,VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY ARRAH 7. THE REGISTRAR,VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY ARRAH ----------- For the petitioners: M/S. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey and Ramanuj Tiwary. For the State : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh. ______ 03. 01.04.2011 All the petitioners are aggrieved because the respondents have re-designated them as demonstrators and treated them as non-teaching staff , which has not only led to loss of their status but even their salary and other perquisites. The service details of these petitioners have been furnished alleging that such a decision is uncalled for. This Court is not required to go into all the aspects of the matter raised by the petitioners in view of a decision of the learned single Judge rendered in a batch of writ applications disposed of on 21.9.2010, one of the writ applications is CWJC No. 1377 of 2010 relating to Laliteshwar Mishra “Lalitesh” and others. It also may be taken note of that at least one such writ application , which also came to be adjudicated by the said learned single Judge related to the petitioners’ belongings to the concerned University namely, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, which was a case of Keshav Rai and others vs. State of Bihar and others (CWJC No.4327 of 2010). While going into the ambit of similar dispute and laying down the law the Court has categorically held : 3 “Before parting, I would like to clarify that this Court, having settled the law in this regard, it would apply to all Universities governed by Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 without any individual discrimination.” If such is the pronouncement and declaration which been made by the High Court then it goes without saying that no separate order is required to be passed by this Bench on the issue. The writ application is disposed of with a clear direction upon the Registrar of Veer Kunwar Singh University that he is now to take appropriate steps for restoring the status quo ante of these petitioners in light of the law so declared, if necessary by taking the approval at appropriate level including the Vice Chancellor of the University. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)