IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2009 THE BAGAYATDAR URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. THROUGH S. G. VEREKAR ... Appellant Versus MRS. NILIMA A. PANANDIKAR ... Respondent Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S. Seth, holding for Mr. A. B. De Sa, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 7th July, 2011 P.C. Mr. Diniz, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal since the cheque amount has been paid by the respondent. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal without prejudice to his rights to resort to other remedies. 2. Mr. Seth, holding for Mr. De Sa, learned Counsel for the respondent, has no objection. 3. Hence, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. In view of the statement made by Mr. Diniz, without prejudice to the rights of the appellant to pursue the other remedies as may be available in law, the appeal stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA