IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3581 of 2011 Md. Mozamil Hussain & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar 6. 09.11.2011. Heard Mr. S. Samsi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh No. 1, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner No. 1 being the husband and petitioner nos. 2 to 6 being family members of the husband are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. On 25.02.2011, the notices were issued to the complainant but it appears that in spite of valid service of notice and entering appearance through lawyer the opposite party no.2 chose not to appear on 04.05.2011 and 08.09.2011 when the matter was fixed for today as a last indulgence. Today again, neither opposite party no.2 is present nor any lawyer is representing her. Considering the fact that initial stand of the petitioners was that divorce was made effective much prior lodging of the 2 present case which has not been controverted by opposite party no.2 till date, let the petitioners, Md. Mozamil Hussain, Noor Jahan Khatoon, Hasmat Tara Husna, Masoom Raza Bakal, Md. Arbaz and Reshma Khatoon be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1149(C) of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)