IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43921 of 2009 PAPU KHAN @ PAPPU KHAN, SON OF BARAFATI KHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AKORHIGOLA, P.S. AKORHIGOLA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS AT SASARAM…………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh and Arti Singh, Advocates. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 15.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the name of the petitioner does not appear in the First Information Report and there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. The motorcycle concerned was recovered by the police at Bagha Khoh. It has also been submitted that the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Bhola Singh, who has disclosed that the petitioner was also involved in the said occurrence. The aforesaid co-accused Bhola Singh has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 2 24.2.2006 passed in Criminal Misc.46041 of 2005. Co-accused Kumesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav vide order dated 10.4.2006 passed in Criminal Misc. No.9718 of 2006 and Deepak Thakur vide order dated 4.10.2007 passed in Criminal Misc. No.45362 of 2007, have also been granted bail by this Court. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Papu Khan @ Pappu Khan, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ram Chandra Prasad, J.M. 1st Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Nasariganj P.S. Case No.44 of 2005, G.R. No.232/05, T.R. No.773 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned will be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)