.^^v' .^".^•••^s.'^^" ... (sv.^-;\s^';:;^.--"" ^•••"§vff^<>-"'" . ^.•<..'"'<<?:\\<;'.^-"" ^-vu^'""' "'^^v"l c f: ias«3l.i <?l THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR c^ CHHATTISGARH WRITPETITIONN0.4<'!')7 /2005 Vikram Singh, S/o- Late Shri Viri Singfa, Aged about 59 years, Presently working as Sub-Divisional (Forest), Jagdalpur, Division-Bastar, . Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChliattisgarh, Through- Principal Secretary, Deptt. ofForest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Conservator ofForest, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ShriD.B.Singh, Sub-Divisional OfScer (Forest) Awapalli, Bijapur Division, Distt. Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS S/VRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE 3. ]^ IpONSTITUTION OF INDW FOR 1SSUANCE OF ^^ ^- ^ ^.^ppRQpRiATE ^RIT |N THE ^AtORE_OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARIETC. Jl: HIGHCOUm-OFCHIWrTISGARHAT BILACT'UR SIN©LEBENCH: HON'BLB MR. SATiSHM.^NIHOTK. J. F^titioner ResBondents WRrr PBTITION NOA917 OF Vikram Singh versus State ef Ghhatti^arh and ettiers Pnsent : Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava.counsel forthe petlto'ener. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for Ule State/responctents No.1 and 2. None appeara for respondent No.3. (Passsd on 191h Bay <rf Febnwy, 2W7) Leamed counsel appeanng fer ttie pe(ffi©nersubmits that the wtft petttion has become Infruetuous with the passage of time, t® whteh teamed counsel appearing for ttie Stetfi/respondents No.1 and 2 has no ob|ection. f 2. The writ peBBon is acGordingly cBsmissed as havlng become infructuous. Noorderastocoste. Sd/-,. ,,.,, SatishK.ftg hotn judge Sopal -J "-•-"——•