Emga gmm ggj‘ai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE‘AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. (S3253 /09 PETITIONER 2 Babloo Bhusan Chakravarty S/o Late Shri S.C. Chakravarty Aged about 46 years, Occupation . — Mining Sardar Grade —B, Churcha West area, Baikunthpur Colliery SECL Baikunthpur, / District Korea (C.G.) Churcha Colliery District — Korea (ca) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Wen VERSUS /' RESPONDENT 2 Branch Manager State Bank of India, Branch — Churcha EGR GOERT OF SHHAT?%3GH AT E§LA$PU;R_ > Q7 (Ham. Mr. Justiee Priiinkea’ Ewaker) Writ PeWiEan (S) N0. 3332 6f EQGQ Smt. Hamida Siddiqui counsel for the petitioner. WRE'E' PETITEQN UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF 'fHE CONSHTUTION OF INDIA GRaER {13.97.2909} With ihe ccnsent of the counsel far the petiiianer, the matter is heam finaiiy. Grievance 9f the petitioner is ‘rha‘i respendeniiaank is deducting his saiary against ihe settied norms and ruies. Ceansei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has aireaciy made twn representations first on 10.1.2009 and the other one on 16.3‘2G09 (Annexures P-4 and P-6 reepectiveiy) but despite snfticient time having been elapsed they have not been decided. She submits that under these circumstances a direction may be issued to the respondent for deciding the pending representations expeditiousiy. Aeoordingiy, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the representations mentioned above which are pending before it. this apart, the petitioner is tree to make another detaiied representation to the respondent and it is further directed that ii the same is filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the respondent shaii decide the same within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. " ' Sd/- t t Judge l r U Pritinker Diwaker J , H PEHTEGNER Babioo Bhusan Chakravarty VERSUS RESPONDENTS Branch Manager, State Bank of india, Branch Churcha Colliery, ‘ District Korea, CG.