f'^w^\"^v '^.-••••"\T'" • BEFORE G^}^ HON'BLE HIGH < ^^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No....^.^.?^....2011 ^ t' PETITIONER RESPONDENTS (1) Sukhdads Ogre , S/o Chamar Rai age 56 years posted at Middle School Bhelwadih Block Abhanpur District Raipur C.G. VERSUS The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) District Education Officer, Raipur District Raipur C.G. (3) Joint Director Treasury and Pension Raipur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE S26 OE THE CONSTITUTSON OF INDIA FOR JSSUANCE OF WRTT OR MANDAMUS/DLRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRJATE WRIT. ^^^ y .^ H8GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITIQN (S) N0.3142/2011 Sukhdas Ogre Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others WR!T PETiTION ARTICLE 226 OF THE OF - Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitloner. Ms. Sunita Jai'n, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 20th June, 2011) The petitioner was jnitialiy appointed as Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After compietion of his probation period, he regular pay scaieofRs. 169-300/-. 2 . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue invoived In the is as to ^vhetfier the petitioner is to regular pay with from the of initial appointment or compietion of probation 3. The issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/89 Yacfii and 5S ¥. ofMR & wherein it was that the simiiarly teachers are to reguiar pay with effect from the of Injtiai appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bie Supreme Court. The was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphojding the decision of .-T^^ i '-%ii^%|; \. '^ ^^w '•^^^^ -1- <>s ^^, the Tribunai So the effect the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are to reguiar pay from the of initia! appointment. 4. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, whiie considering the same issue in Amar Sai & v. of & Others. W.P.(S).No.4725/2006, by order 01-09-2006, aiiowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period of ten d-ays, raising al! the grievances. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted libeily to make a representation raising a!l grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and the circular dated 05-01-2011 (Annexure PaB5) and in turn, the concerned respondent is to the representation, if any, in accordance with Saw, on its own merits, within a period of three months from the of receipt of the representation, subject to verjfication of the facts. 6. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ?'n Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge