IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 29430 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AMMU, D/O. UMMINI, PERUMTHOTTATHIL VEEDU, NEMOM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PREM SMT.K.P.SANTHI SRI.S.S.HUSSAIN SRI.P.K.NIJOY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEMOM. 3. KANAKADAS @ ANI, PERUMTHOTTATHIL VEEDU, NEMOM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. PREETI @ MOLY, PERUMTHOTTATHIL VEEDU, NEMOM.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR FOR R3 & 4 SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL – R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 29430/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE KUDIKIDAPPU PURCHASE CERTIFICATE DATED 28.5.1990. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 6.9.2002 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 5.4.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8.9.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 23.9.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 29430 OF 2008-C ----------------------------------------- Dated 12th November, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner, who is a 76 year old widow, has approached this Court, seeking necessary police protection, alleging that her grand daughter, the 4th respondent and her husband, the 3rd respondent herein, are harassing her. She apprehends threat to her life from their side. So, she moved the police by filing repeated representations. The last of them was Ext.P5 dated 23.9.2008. Alleging that the police failed to protect her, this writ petition is filed. 2. The respondents 3 and 4 submit that they along with the mother of the 4th respondent, who is the daughter of the petitioner, are residing together. They deny the allegations of threat or violence against her. The petitioner is filing these complaints at the instance of her niece Omana. WPC 29430/08 2 3. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner is in the habit of filing complaints, accusing her grand daughter. If there is any threat to her life, the petitioner can inform the police. In that event, necessary protection will be granted to her, it is submitted. The above submission of the learned Government Pleader is recorded and the Writ Petition is disposed of. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. Nm/