IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6364 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ MEHAMDABAD TALUKA PANCHAYAT Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 6364 of 1993 MR ND NANAVATI for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 01/08/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT The present petition is preferred by the petitioner against the notice dated 25.5.93(annexure "A") issued by the Development Commissioner for supersession of the Taluka Panchayat. This court has passed order on 30.6.93 of issuing notice and granting ad-interim relief. Thereafter, on July 21,1993 when the petition came up to be admitted the ad-interim relief was confirmed till final disposal of this petition. 2. By afflux of time the statutory term of the Panchayat is already over since the statutory term of the Panchayat is for a period of five years from the date of election. In that view of the matter, since the statutory term of the Panchayat is over there will not be any question of supersession and therefore this petition has become infructuous by afflux of time. The petition is therefore dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. 1.8.02 (JAYANT PATEL,J)