IC-78 ^ST -qK410^, yTTl^^|<A, Rril^^ ^-^:fM^._^Q^ /Q^ TFI^TSFHT^ """"""••"••••••••••'••••••••• ^F^ 200 3TT^?T q^p (liclij6|<^) 3TT^$T^R^|cb <ran3n^9TaRt<p ?^TW^Tf^T3n^$T PBTITIONER Goverdh^n Lal Sahu, aged about 44 years, S/o Shri Gajnesh Ram Sahu, Occupation Warder (Prahari)^ Central Jail Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur ((pG), resident ofJail Line, Quarter No.I/31 Raipur T|ehsil and District Raipur (CG) flersus RBSPONDENTS 1. The Stat Departm( Transportjation Tehsil an 2. The Depi Home (Jaj Raipur (Ct 3. The Direc of Jails, Raipur (C| 4.. The Supe Tehsil an<( 5. Shri Ral Central J- L^ of Chhattisgarhy Through Secretary, ?|nt of Home Affairs/Jail and Mantraly, DKS Building, Raipur, pistrict Raipur (CG) [ty Secretary, Chhattisgarh Government, |il) Department, Mantralay, DKS Building 8.B. Hon?ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. 26.11.2008 Shn SK Thomas, counsel Shri YS Thakur, Dy AG f< This petition is directe^ 10.9.2003 (Annexure P/l) and posted at Central Jafl, Rail cpi^fc^41ri *ii^oY^"I^l<) <<RI^I<< ^3Tf^T3?7^$T 3) tor General of Police 8& Inspector General ^hhattisgarh, Raipur, Tehsil and Dlstrict 3) rintendent of Jail^ Central Jail, Raipur, District Raipur (CGA) ju Prasad Choubey, Warder/Rrahari, lil, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur (CG) Writ Petition undCTArticle 326/227 ofthe <3onstitution oflndia for fhe petitioner. >r the State. agaiast fhe inipugned oider dated wh€|reby fhe petitioner, who is Jail Warder ^ur was traasferred to Sub JaU, Sukma, iy ' '' ''y';N.;^^5g^' ^3^'^tww'^, u>-al^<i<o, Rril^y^ ^_ (^ f /Vr^ / ^^3/^ *iW^l ^m^ •—••--•••-••••-••.-/..... ^Fy 200^ 3TT^?T traq? (ijclljdc^) 3T1^^T<CTl^itcp ^T^T^^T^Hfc^ ^^ 1-1 B';^TT^R;Rf^T3n^^T 2- iateilloi Shri YS Thakur, leam< submits that by virtue 6f iate] the order impugned could no1 circumstances, fhe traiisfer redundaat aad meaiiiagless that he has no objection tf ioipugned is set aside wifh orders ia fhe matter of adnunistrative exigency. ^d Dy Advocate General for fhe State oider dated 13.8.2004 of fhis Court, be given effect to till date and ia these |order of AnnexureP/1 has become fhe lapse of time. He fdrfher submits fhe petition is allowed and the order Ijiberty to fhe State to pass appropriate ^ransfer of tfae petitioner zinder the wlith submislsiDn In view of above mstaat petition is aUowed. so far as it relates to fhe pe shaU be at Uberty to pass fhe petitioner ia fhe event ofald ch^fo'jl^+ii^oVff^St ^RI^I^ ^ 3Tf^T 3TT^$T oflearaed counsel for tiie State, fhe I^Lpugned toransfer order of Annexure P/1, Itioner, is set aside. However, fhe State appjropriate orders with regard to transfer of ofa|dmiaistrative exigency, _ Sd/- Db>r.n*^i8tea 3ud&e )N