IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1213 of 2009 Between: Gandu China Bikshapathi S/o. Ramaiah R/o. Ghatkesar Village & Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad Ranga Reddy at Hyderabad. 2 The Circle Inspector of Police Ghatkesar Police Station Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Station House Officer Ghatkesar Police Station Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police more particularly respondents 2 and 3 in not registering the report dated 28-12-2008, received and endorsed by the 3rd respondent on 29-12-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also is in transgression of Section 154(1) of Cr.P.C., and consequently direct the respondent authorities to register an FIR in accordance with law. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.UGRANARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the action of the respondent police, more particularly respondents 2 and 3 in not registering the report dated 28.12.2008, which was received and endorsed by the 3rd respondent on 29.12.2008. On 29.1.2009 when the matter was taken up for admission, the learned Government Pleader for Home took notice and sought time to get instructions in the matter. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Government Pleader has produced before the Court the FIR registered on the complaint given by the petitioner under Sections 447, 427, 323 and 506 IPC. Since the request of the petitioner has already been complied with by the respondents by registering the case, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition and it is accordingly closed. N.V.RAMANA,J DATED 5.2.2009 msv