IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL REVISION No.2384 OF 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 04, 2011 Reeman ...Petitioner Versus Chander Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Maharaj Kumar, Advocate, for Ms.Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this revision petition to impugn the order passed by the trial Court, whereby some of the accused named by her have not been summoned. The trial Court, on the basis of evidence, has summoned accused Nos.1 to 8, but, however, declined the prayer of the petitioner to summon accused Nos.11 and 12, who are Doctors and so also some of the police officials. A perusal of the evidence given by the complainant would clearly show that laborious efforts have been made to drag in the Doctors as well as the police officers in this incident. I do not see any role, which would result in invoking criminal liability against the Doctors or the police officers. Accordingly, I do not find any infirmity in the view formed by the trial Court. No case for interference, therefore, is made out. Dismissed. October 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE