WPSS No.909 of 2006 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the respondents. The petitioner had initially filed the writ petition challenging the suspension order. An interim order was passed staying the suspension order. During the pendency of the writ petition, the disciplinary authority passed an order upon the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings issuing a warning to the petitioner to be alert in future. This order has been challenged by the petitioner by means of the amendment application which is allowed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has a remedy to file appeal under the relevant rules challenging the suspension order. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 09.03.2010 Shiv