IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 18315 of 2010 Date of decision 19 .4.2011 Nallathampi ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present: Mr. Jagdeep Jaswal,Advocate for the petitioner None for respondent no.1. None for respondent nos. 2 to 4. 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against order dated 22.7.2010 rendered by the Chandigarh Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (for brevity 'the Tribunal') holding that the petitioner cannot be reinstated in service after his conviction in a criminal case. It is appropriate to mention that the petitioner was working as daily wager with the respondent-administration before a criminal case was registered against him in which he was convicted. His conviction has been upheld upto Hon'ble the Supreme Court. He has no right to hold any post being daily wager. In the absence of any right to hold the post no enquiry is required to be held and therefore no direction could be issued for his reinstatement. The order of the Tribunal does not call for any interference. The writ petition is wholly without merit. Dismissed. (M.M.Kumar) Judge (T.P.S. Mann) 19.4.2011 Judge okg