1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8589 OF 2009 Vijay Narsingrao Anmul & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8590 OF 2009 Santoshkumar Raghunath Chiplunkar & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for Petitioners. Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for Respondents 1 & 3. ...... CORAM:- A.S.OKA, J. DATED:- FEBRUARY 25, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners. 2. The application for amendment was moved at a stage when the Suit was posted for recording of evidence. By the impugned order, the said application for amendment has been rejected. 2 3. At this stage, in writ jurisdiction, no interference is called for. The order is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioners against the decree passed in the Suit, if the same be adverse to the Petitioners. 4. Writ Petitions disposed of accordingly. (A.S.OKA, J.)