THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.R.P. NO.1938 OF 2010 DATED: 24.11.2010 BETWEEN: Brajendra Khandelwal .. Petitioner And T.Suri Babu and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.R.P. NO.1938 OF 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against the orders dated 06.04.2010 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Kottavalasa in I.A.No.555 of 2009 in O.S.No.99 of 2009. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that the learned trial Court initially granted temporary injunction and from time to time it was extended, but ultimately when the respondents raised objection that there is an order passed in the writ petition, wherein the petitioner is a party, and there is an injunction against some of the respondents therein the learned trial Court declined to extend the ex parte interim injunction. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that on the date of filing of the suit and making interlocutory application for temporary injunction, he was not aware of the pendency of the writ petition and the notice in the writ petition was subsequently served on him, therefore, he is not guilty of suppression of the fact of pendency of the writ petition and the order passed by the High court in W.P.M.P.No.30666 of 2009 in W.P.No.23605 of 2009. Even if the contention urged by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner is correct, the Court below can refuse to extend the temporary injunction in view of the fact that the injunction order passed by this Court was at the earliest point of time and it was not brought to the notice of the Court at the subsequent stage after granting temporary injunction without knowledge of the orders of injunction passed by this court in the writ petition. There is no illegality or irregularity committed by the trial Court in refusing to extend the interim injunction order. Hence, I see no merit in the revision petition. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs. ________________ Date: 24.11.2010 R. KANTHA RAO, J kvrm THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.R.P. NO.1938 OF 2010 DATED: 24.11.2010