1 (1) S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4913/2007 JASWANT SINGH V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. (2) S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4916/2007 BRIJ LAL SHARMA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. (3) S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4917/2007 GURWINDER SINGH V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. (4) S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4918/2007 RANVEER SINGH V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. (5) S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4919/2007 MANGAT SINGH V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. (6) S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4920/2007 DEVI LAL V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS. DATE OF ORDER :::: 27/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI Mr.H.S.Sidhu, for Petitioners. Mr.Kamlesh Rawat, for Respondents. The petitioners have challenged the order of transfer dated 30.07.2007, passed by the Collector on the 2 instructions of the Government. The main ground taken for the challenge to the order is of the competence because, according to the Rules, Government cannot issue instructions for transfer. It is submitted that the controversy raised in the aforesaid writ petitions, has otherwise been decided by this Court in the case of Inder Singh & Others v. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2007 (1) RLW 737. It is further submitted that the judgment aforesaid was further challenged before the Division Bench, but then, it was affirmed. In the present matters also, the petitioners, being Patwaris, were transferred by the impugned order passed by the Collector, but on the instructions of the Government. Hence, these matters are covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Inder Singh and Others (Supra). In the result, the impugned orders of transfer qua the petitioners, are set aside. However, the Competent 3 Authority would be at liberty to pass necessary orders as per their competence, if exigency so arises. The above writ petitions are accordingly allowed with no order as to costs. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. scd