IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1966 of 2009 1. Md. Nasiruddin Ansari S/O Late Suman Ansari R/O Vill.- Ratanpur, P.S.- Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mithu Singh S/O Ramjapan Singh R/O Vill.- Ratanpur, P.S.- Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi 3. Chunchun Singh @ Tuntun Singh S/O Kedar Singh R/O Vill.- Ratanpur, P.S.- Majorganj, Distt.- Sitamarhi ---------------------------------- 02. 23.12.2011 The informant/petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 26.10.2009 passed by 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial No. 422 of 2008 by which the accused O.P. Nos.2 to 3 have been acquitted. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. It is submitted that the learned trial-court has not considered the evidence properly and has acquitted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It appears that the learned trial-court has considered the evidence adduced on behalf of the prosecution and has also considered the defence of the accused. The view taken by the learned trial-court is also possible; I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Hence, petition is dismissed. Mkr. ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)