v ' .\i. HIGHCOURTOFJUDICATURECHHATnSGARH-.BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ PETmONER RESPONDENTS W.P, N0,1732 of 2006 Vijay Gupta, S/o Shriram Gupta, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Arang, In front of Mandi Gate, Dish'ict Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Mining, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Directorate of Geology and Mining, Ring Road, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Through Mining OfRcer, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Mining Offlcer, Minlng Department, Collectorate Raipur (C.G.) 5. Hemlal Sahu, Aged about 32 years, S/o Shri Tirath Ram Sahu, R/o Birkoni, Tehsil Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) Present: Shri ^hok Soni, learned counset for the petidoner. Shri Sanjay S Agrawal, learned Govt. Adv. for State. Shri Yogesh Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.5. ORAI- ORDER [Passed on 04 September, 2006) Against the impugned orcter a revision lies to the State Govemment under Rule 58 of the ChhatKsgarh Minor Minerat Rules, 1996, which remedy is more comprehensive and complete. (2) Having heard tearned counsel for the parties, 1 do not find any extraordinary circumstance which could pereuade me to permit the petitioner to straightaway approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndia without exhausting the attemaUve remedy provkled under Rule 58 of the Chhath'sgarh Minor Minerat Rules, 1996. tn that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed, however, reserving ^'^ -71',<^*v> 33psnf J3iq3 -/PS •qsoooN "^uoiflne leuoisiAej aqt ejo.fsq pe}B}!6e sq (4 uedo y^ eje sGuipeo|d SAjtosdssj 1104} ui ssgjed 8iB Aq pssiej suoffusiuoo eift nv "9661. "ss|ny lejauii^ JOUIM i|je6s|Bei|40 sifl y> 85 slna ^spun Apaiusj sqi ^o IJBAB 0} jauosBsd sqi 0} ^jsqii -^