IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2588 of 2010 1. Umesh Pandey S/O Late Ram Lakhan Pandey R/O Vill. And P.O.- Kulharia, P.S.- Koeilwar, Distt.- Bhojpur Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mrs. S.N.Saffina, The Collector, Bhojpur At Arrah 3/ 12/10/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The Court has considered the representation dated 23.7.2005 directions for disposal of which had been sought. Alleging non-compliance it is submitted that the representation has yet not been disposed. The representation in no uncertain terms states that the petitioner was a daily wager. He seeks the relief for regularization. The order of the Writ Court adequately notices the stand of the State that any appointment in government service can only be after proper selection, preparation of a panel and appointment preceded by a proper advertisement and competitive selection on merits. Even otherwise, the law stands well settled by now that a daily wager holds no post and has no claim for regularization. If the opposite parties advertise and the petitioner applies in response to the same, naturally his case has to be considered on its 2 own merits. The contempt application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)