IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.13675-M of 2010 Date of Decision:1.12.2010 Naib Singh @ Billa .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate for Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.93 dated 16.5.2009 registered under Sections 302/148/149/427 of IPC at Police Station Jakhal, District Fatehabad. It is contended that injury attributed to the petitioner is on the shoulder. However, as per the medical report, there is no injury on the shoulder of the deceased. Heard. Role attributed to the petitioner in the FIR reads as under: “ Malkiat gave a blow on the right leg by the iron rod and then he was taken to a nearby field which was 15 to 20 paces away where Nayab with his iron rod and Roop and Rura with their iron rod and Kala with his ghop gave blows on his left shoulder, left hand elbow, on fingers of right hand and gave blow on elbow of right Crl. M. No.13675-M of 2010 -2- hand. When I and Vinod tried to save Gandhi then Nayab gave him blow on right shoulder and Roop gave a blow with his hands on the face of Vinod which hit him on his lips.” Even though the 2nd specific injury on the right shoulder is not found on the body of the deceased but the other injuries inflicted after dragging the deceased do find mentioned in the medical report. As per the allegation the petitioner was a member of the group, who inflicted multiple injuries and indulged in violence. Besides, it is specifically stated in the FIR that accused had dragged the deceased to a distance of 15-20 paces from the place of occurrence before giving further injuries. As per the medical report, the deceased died due to the head injury and multiple injuries received by him. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has submitted that the prosecution evidence is almost complete except two formal witnesses. Accordingly, no ground to grant bail is made out. Dismissed. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. However, nothing observed here in above shall be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case. 1.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE