IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION No.5688 OF 2006. Mr.Shankar Shivram Panchal. ..Petitioner. Vs. M.S.R.T.C. Corporation, Ratnagiri. ..Respondent. M.S.Topkar for the Petitioner. G.S.Hegde for Respondent. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. CORAM:R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J. DATED:15TH DATED:15TH DATED:15TH NOVEMBER, 2006. NOVEMBER, 2006. NOVEMBER, 2006. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1] Heard. 2] There are counter findings regarding misconduct on the part of the petitioner in relation to misappropriation of the amount collected from the passengers in the bus by issuing tickets of less value and in fact the amount collected was more than the face value of the ticket. This clear findings have been arrived at by the Industrial Court at the detail analysis of materials on record and they are clearly apparent from the record. Judgments sought to be impugned do not disclose any jurisdictional error on the part of the courts below, nor there is case made out for interference in the writ jurisdiction in the impugned judgments. The Judgments [[2]] neither disclose perversity nor any finding to be contrary to the materials on record. It is well settled law that once the employer looses the confidence in their employee and more particularly when the employee is required to deal with money matters on behalf of the employer, there cannot be any justification for interference by the courts in the punishment of termination of services imposed by the management on such employee. Considering the same there is no case for interference. Petition therefore fails and is therefore rejected. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J] [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J] [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J]