caw3129.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLN. (W) NO.3129/2011 IN WRIT PETN. NO.4275/2011 (DECIDED) Bharat Gangaram Ingole -vs- The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Akola CIVIL APPLN. (W) NO.3128/2011 IN WRIT PETN. NO.4963/2011 (DECIDED) Murlidhar Laxmandas Purohit -vs- Sindhi Hindi Vidhya Samiti and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Anand, counsel for the applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 02.12.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. The prayer made in the civil application cannot be granted after the petition is decided by the order dated 08/11/2011. The application is rejected with costs of rupees two hundred. At this juncture, the applicant’s counsel raises his voice and states before the Court that this is not the way of passing the orders because the Full Bench has clearly held that caw3129.11.odt 2/2 unless and until the authority which passes the order is joined as a party to the writ petition a letters patent appeal would not be tenable. This Court had already understood the submission made on behalf of the applicant. Now, the application is rejected with costs of rupees five hundred. JUDGE KHUNTE