IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.52 of 2007 SUBODH SINGH @ SUBODH KUMAR Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. DEEPLAL RAM 3. KAMAL RAM 4. MANGAL RAM 5. KAUSHALYA DEVI 6. RITA DEVI ----------- 4 06.01.2009 Counsel for the petitioner tried to highlight that there is apparent illegality in the judgment. This court perused the judgment. The learned Trial Court has assigned adequate/sufficient reason to disbelieve the witnesses who have been examined to prove the charge. This Court, therefore, finds no infirmity in the judgment under challenge. The application seeking leave stands rejected. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)