IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14800 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Som Nath …PETITIONER VERSUS Municipal Corporation, Panchkula and others …RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR --- PRESENT: Mr. P.S. Hundal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Premjit Singh Hundal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 and 3. … SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant petition against the show cause notice dated 29.3.2007 (Annexure P-2), whereby he has been ordered to remove the unauthorised possession of the Corporation land within seven days. Admittedly, against the show cause notice, the petitioner approached the Civil Court by filing a Civil Suit for injunction. In the said suit, the petitioner also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC for grant of ad-interim injunction which was pending at the time of filing of the present writ petition. In view of the above facts, we are not inclined to entertain this C.W.P. No.14800 of 2010 -2- petition only against the show cause notice as the petitioner has remedy to reply to the show cause notice. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to reply to the show cause notice. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE September 20, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) vkg JUDGE