IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc.-M No.35767 of 2010 [O&M] Date of Decision: 29th April, 2011. Jarnail Singh Petitioner through Mr. HPS Ghuman, Advocate Versus State of Punjab Respondents through Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The prayer in this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is to release the petitioner on regular bail in case FIR No. 275 dated 28.12.2009, under Section 307/324/323/ 148/149/506 IPC and 25/27/54/59 Arms Act, registered at Police Station, Patran, District Patiala. As per the allegations, the injuries which have attracted Section 307 IPC were caused by the petitioner with a 12 bore gun. The undisputed facts are that the petitioner is in custody since 1.1.2010 and there is cross version also. It is also not in dispute that the complainant has already been examined as a witness. In these circumstances when the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some more time, however, without expressing any views on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petition is accordingly allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the CJM, Patiala. Disposed of. Dasti. April 29, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE