1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28/6/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD) No.679 of 2011 Guruvaiya ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to Government Revenue Department Secretariat, Chennai 9. 2. The Principal Secretary-cum- Revenue Administrative Commissioner Ezhilagam, Chennai 5. 3. The District Collector Tirunelveli District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 5. The Tahsildar Sivagiri Taluk Sivagiri, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to issue suitable order in pursuant to the letter No.A.Ku.A4/87867/08 E dated 10/8/2009 and A4/38555/2008 dated 6/11/2008 by the second and third respondents respectively regarding the compassionate appointment of the petitioner within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court and consequently direct the third respondent to issue appointment order to the petitioner. For Petitioner: Mr.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran For Respondents: Mr.B.Pugalendhi, Spl.G.P - - - - - O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.B.Pugalendhi, Special Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. This writ petition has been filed praying to direct the first respondent to issue suitable order in pursuant to the letter No.A.Ku.A4/87867/08 E dated 10/8/2009 and A4/38555/2008 dated 6/11/2008 by the second and third respondents respectively regarding the compassionate appointment of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. It is the case of the petitioner that his father was murdered in a communal clash on 28/1/1998. He made a representation to the third respondent seeking appointment on compassionate ground. The third respondent directed the fifth respondent to conduct an enquiry and submit a report. The fifth respondent conducted an enquiry and submitted a report to the fourth respondent recommending his case for appointment. The fourth respondent in turn sent a report to the third respondent recommending the case of the petitioner for appointment. Thereafter, the second respondent also addressed a communication to the first respondent recommending the case of the petitioner. However, the first respondent has not passed any orders so far. Hence the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the first respondent to pass appropriate orders or take appropriate decision, in the light of the recommendation made by the second and third respondents, on merits and in accordance with law. The said exercise has to be carried out within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. This writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1. The Secretary to Government Revenue Department Secretariat, Chennai 9. 2. The Principal Secretary-cum- Revenue Administrative Commissioner Ezhilagam, Chennai 5. 3. The District Collector Tirunelveli District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 5. The Tahsildar Sivagiri Taluk, Sivagiri, Tirunelveli District. + 1 cc to Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran, Advocate, SR No.20568 W.P.(MD)No.679 of 2011 28/6/2011 mvs. RJ/5.7.11 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/