IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21858 of 2011 Shyam Narayan Pathak, Son of Late Radheshyam Pathak, R/o Mohalla Arafabad, Rajput Toli, P.O. Gulzarbagh, P.S. Alamganj, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Patna. 5. The District Agriculture Officer, Patna. 6. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Masaudhi, Patna. 7. The Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Masaudhi, Patna. 8. The Accountant General (A & E), Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 9.12.2011. Heard Shri Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri R.K. Sinha, learned A.C. to G.P.4 appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 7/State of Bihar and Shri J.P. Karn, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.8/Accountant General. The petitioner, who retired on 30.6.2008 as Driver from Sub Divisional Agriculture Office, Masaurhi, has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension as per 6th pay revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is getting pension still in old rate. The petitioner has filed representation before respondent no.7/Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Masaurhi, for the relief sought for in the present writ petition. The court is of the opinion that writ 2 petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation regarding claim of revision of pension before respondent no.7 as well as respondent no.8/Accountant General within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the respondents are required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of filing of such representation. If both the respondents consider the claim of the petitioner as genuine, they are required to pass appropriate order revising the pension of the petitioner within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, both the respondents are required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within one month from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)