Kambli 1 wp258.09 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.258 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4926 OF 2009 AND LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.259 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5558 OF 2009 ... Vijay K. Mehta ...Appellant v/s. Charu K. Mehta & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.D.D.Madan with Mr.Pranya Goyal i/b M/s.Wadia Ghandhi for Appellant. Mr.Amir A. i/b M/s.Thakore Jariwala & Associates for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATED: 22nd November,2010 Kambli 2 wp258.09 P.C.: The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant informs that the Appellant expired on 21st July, 2010. No application for bringing legal representatives of the Appellant on record has been made. The Petition, therefore, abates. In any case what is challenged in the Appeals is the interlocutory order and as admittedly the main proceedings have been decided, interlocutory order obviously can be challenged while challenging the final order passed in the proceedings. Nothing survives in the Appeals. Appeals, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.Deshmukh,J.) (N.D.Deshpande, J.)