IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2010 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37041 of 2010(E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SIVADASAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.SANKU, ASWATHY BHAVANAM, KANNAMKARA MUKALIL, PALAMEL VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.RENJITH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. 3. TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, MAVELIKARA-690 101. 4. BABU, AGED 60 YEARS, ENNAKKAD VEEDU, AKKAMUKKU, KUDASSANAD, PALAMEL VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA-690 101. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 37041 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains that there is a proposal for shifting ARD 115 now situated in Palamel Panchayat in Alappuzha District to some other place. It is stated that, coming to know of the aforesaid proposal, Panchayat has passed Ext.P1 resolution objecting to the same. It is contended that despite Ext.P1 resolution, authorities are proceeding with the proposal. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, there is any such proposal, it is for the petitioner to move respondents 2 or 3 as the case may be, and it is for them to take appropriate action particularly taking into account the inconvenience which is likely to be caused to the card holders who are attached to the shop in question. Therefore, leaving it open to the petitioner to move the authorities concerned and directing that in such an event, necessary action will be taken in the light of Ext.P1, this writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp