IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 12113 of 2008. Decided on: 30th December, 2010. Sita Ram Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Hamender Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Hamender Chandel, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable his client to file a fresh petition on the same and similar cause of action. However, since the petitioner had been pursuing the remedy before this Court diligently, the limitation will not come in his way, in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 -