1 Cri-A-149-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 149 OF 2011 IN REVISION APPLICATION OF. 167 OF 2011 Kailash Amarlal Lund ... Applicant Vs. Jagdish Gobindram Tejwani & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. P.R.Arjunwadkar,Advocate, for the applicant Mr.P.P.Bhosale,Advocate for the respondent No.1. Smt. M.R.Tidke, APP, for the respondent No.2 State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 29th April, 2011. P.C. 1. The revision application was filed against the order of conviction and sentence for the offence under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The application is filed seeking leave to compound the offence and that application is supported by a memorandum of understanding entered into between the parties. The respondent No.1, who is the original complainant, has filed his affidavit supporting the application. According to the learned Counsel, all the cases between the parties have been amicably settled and, therefore, in the interest of justice, they are allowed to compound the case. 2 Cri-A-149-11.sxw 2. Revision Application is allowed and the order of conviction passed in Summary Case No.44/2006 and the order dismissing the appeal are hereby set aside. The applicant/accused is hereby acquitted of the charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Application and the Revision Application stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)