HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR.M.P. N0. 27/2008 APPLICANT Mohammad Hadis Ansari S/o. Kamxuddin, aged about 37 years, R] o. Village Jhabar, Police Station Daltenganj, District Palngu (Jharkhand) Versus NON-APPLICANTS 1. State of C.G. through RS. Chandrpur, District Raigarh (CG) 2. The Distxict Magistrate Distn'ct Janjgir Champa (CG) CR.M.P. UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE GREG. (SB :Hon’ble Shri T.P.Sharma, J.) Pmsent: Shri F.S.Khare, counsel for the applicant. Shri G.D.Vaswani, Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 29th January 2008) The petition is directed against the order dated 3. 1.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG) in Criminal Revision No. 20/ 2008 by which the leanled Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, upheld the order dated 17. 12.2007 passed by JMFC Sakti, Link court, Dhabra in Criminal Case No. 2598/ 2007. 2. The property in question was bullocks/ cattle, 16 in number, which were seized horn the applicant by the police station Chandrapur and registered Crime No. 186/ 2006 punishable under Section 4,6,10 and 11 of the C.G. Krishi Pashu Parirakshan Adhiniyam 2004. 3. Charge sheet has also been hled against the applicant in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sakti, Link Court Dhabra and an application for interim custody of the property has been tiled by the applicant‘in Criminal Case No. 2598/ 2007. The application was rejected vide order dated 17. 12.2007. 4. Climinal Revision No. 20/ 2008 vide onier d 5. ated 3. 1.2008. ed/applicant is for the crime 11 of the CG Kn'shi Pashu Charge sheet filed against ths accus punishable undar Section 4,6,10 and Palirakshan Adhiniyam 2004 6. Denial of the interim custody of the principle of law. Thus, the Cr.P.C. applicant is based 011 sound no interference is called for under Section 482 of 7. Consequently, dismissed. the petition is devoid of merits and is accoxtlingly, Sdl- T.P.Sharma nn ‘ nix x " Judge