IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No. 5360 /2005 : K Dindayal Karsal Son of Shri Bhikham Singh ‘Karsal,‘ aged about 28 years, Shiksha Karmi iSchool Grade-3, Primary Dongariya, Tahsi‘l Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The anc?ecretary,b I? Deartment of I aralaya, D.K‘.S. Bhawan Raiur (C.G.). p Mnt p Janpad . Panchayat Marwahi, Thrgh: The Chief Executive Officer, Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.). The Additional Collector, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Th District Education Officer, ducation District Bilaspur (C.G.). The Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ‘ ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. PETITIONER ou e E HIGH COURE ORCHHATHSGARH AT BILASF‘UR WRIT PETITION NO. 5360 ofZOO5 Dindayal Kama! Peiitioner Versus Rasnondent State of Chhanisgarh 8:» others wrm pETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE consmou OF INDIA ' (SB : Hon'bla Mr. Satish K Agnihom, .I ) Present:- Shrl Adltya Kumar Advocate Wltn Shrl PP b'ahu ' Advocate for the petitioner Shrl M P S Bhatla, Daputy Governmant Advocate for the State _ : ORDER (ORAL) , (Passed on 7‘“ DaydApnI 2010) ‘ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner subthits that the raiiefr sought for in this petitioner has already ’beenigranrted by the respondengs and as such nothing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not eontrovea the above submission. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismiseed as« having beoorne I \ xi ’ Sd/- 9 Sansh K Agnlhotrl Judge infructuous.