CRM-M No.13820 of 2011 Sudhir Prashar alias Pinka Prashar & Anr. Vs. The State of U.T. Chandigarh Present: Mr.H.S.Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Seema Mor, Advocate, for UT, Chandigarh. This is a petition for the grant of anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No.92 dated 23.04.2011, under Sections 332, 353 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-19, Chandigarh. On 6.05.2011, the following contention was noticed: “ Learned counsel has argued that here is no injury and no recovery is to be made.” Learned counsel appearing for the Union Territory has accepted this fact but contended that the petitioners assaulted the Inspector and therefore, do not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. In my considered opinion, since no recovery is to be effected and no custodial interrogation is required, the petitioners deserve concession of anticipatory bail. If the petitioners are found guilty they will be liable to face punishment which would be awarded. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest the petitioners shall shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under section 438(2) Cr.PC. Petition stands disposed of. (Ajay Tewari) 16.05.2011 Judge rp