IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 429 OF 2010. (RAJU SUKHDEO THAKUR...VS... STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER..) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Vinay Dahat (Appointed), Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. K.S. Joshi, A.P P. for Respondents. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 18, 2010. The grievance made by the petitioner, who has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, by Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.one thousand and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months, is that although he has been granted bail by learned Single Judge of this Court he is not in a position to furnish surety and as such he may be released on personal bond. It is not disputed that the petitioner has engaged an Advocate and has filed an appeal before the learned Single Judge. As such appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to file appropriate application before the learned Single Judge. The remedy by way of writ petition is not appropriate remedy. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Needless to mention that the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the learned Single Judge. Fees payable to Mr. Vijay Dahat, Advocate appointed to appear on behalf of the petitioner are quantified at Rs.seven hundred and fifty only. JUDGE JUDGE RR.