Criminal Revision No. 723 of 1999 -1- ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Criminal Revision No. 723 of 1999 Date of Decision : 27.2.2008 Ghuddar Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. P.S. Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ... S.D. Anand, J. The main appeal preferred by the convicted-accused Satpal Singh stands rejected vide orders on that file. The detailed discussion appears on that file only. Criminal Revision No. 723 of 1999 -2- ... In the present case, the learned Trial Court recorded adequate reasons in support of the finding of acquittal. Apart therefrom, the investigation of this case had been verified by Inspector Gurnam Singh, DSP Gurdev Singh, DSP Sukhmander Singh of Phul, and SP (D) Mohinder Pal Singh Gill and all of them found the respondents-accused innocent of the charge. On that count only they had been indicated in column No.2 of the report under Section 173 Cr.PC and their summoning as accused was ordered only by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Phul, vide order dated 5.5.1990. The trial Judge had noticed that the acquitted accused had no motive to participate in the impugned occurrence. The parameters, by which we are authorized to examine a verdict of acquittal, were laid down by the Apex Court in Ramesh Babulal v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1996 SC 2035, Jaswant Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 2000 SC 1833 and Main Pal v. State of Haryana, AIR 2004 SC 2158 Examined on the touch stone aforementioned and for the very reasons recorded by the learned Trial Judge, we do not find any ground adequate enough for us to intervene in the impugned finding. The petition against acquittal shall stand dismissed. ( S. D. ANAND ) JUDGE February 27,2008. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE sn