1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Cr. Misc. 3 rd Bail Application No.2267/2010 (Vikram Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 04.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.Sanjay Mehla, for the petitioner. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accuse, namely, Ramotar has already been granted bail and the case of present petitioner is similar to that of the co-accused, thus he may also be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, has opposed this bail application and submits that Ramotar was granted bail looking to the fact that there was no allegation for causing injury to the deceased whereas against the present petitioner, there exists allegation in view of the statement of PW 6, thus he may not be enlarged on bail. After considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, which may effect the out come of the trial but looking 2 to the facts available on record, I am not inclined to accept this bail application and accordingly, the same is dismissed. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.S-5