THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH C.R.P.NO.1182 OF 2010 O R D E R Heard both the counsel. 2. Aggrieved by the order dated 4.3.2010 in I.A.No.1421/2009 in O.S.No.107/2004 in dismissing the petition filed by the defendants under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act for sending the disputed signatures to an expert for opinion, the present revision is filed. 3. The case of the petitioners in the cross-examination of P.Ws.1 and 2 they have admitted that the there is difference in disputed signature on Exs.A-1 to A-3 and that of admitted signature on vakalat and written statement. Therefore, they sought for sending the same to expert for opinion, but the court below without considering the material evidence on record, dismissed the I.A. Hence, the impugned order is sought to be set aside. 4. From the material on record it could be seen that the suit is filed for specific performance of an agreement of sale and the case of the plaintiffs right from the beginning is that Exs.A-1 to A-3 were signed and executed by the defendants and they have categorically denied the suggestion that the said documents were not executed by the defendants. Further, the suit is of the year 2004 and as per the material on record, it is an old identified matter for disposal and the evidence is closed and the matter is coming up for arguments and at this stage, I do not see any justifiable grounds on the part of the defendants in seeking the court below to send the disputed signatures to an expert for opinion. Considering the facts and circumstances on record, the court below rightly exercising its discretionary jurisdiction, dismissed the I.A. and I do not find any illegality or any jurisdictional error for interference of this court and the revision is devoid of any merits and hence dismissed. No costs. AVS ------------------------- - 21—09—2010