1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 471 of 2011 Prachi W/o. Tapan Salgia .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others ...Respondents Mr. A.M.Saraogi for Applicant . Mr. V.B.Kondedeshmukh APP for State CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 12th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Sarogi. According to him large number of articles are lying with the respondent no.2-husband and there is no recovery in respect of those articles. He has drawn my attention to the relevant portion, which according to him indicates that various articles are lying with the husband respondent. He makes a grievance that there is no recovery and that is how the anticipatory bail should be cancelled. 2 2. After having gone through the papers, I am not inclined to accept this submission. It is case of State that the respondent no.2 is not co- operating with the police authorities. If the respondent no.2 is not co-operating with the police authorities, it will be open for the police authorities to make an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail. Merely because there is no recovery, as suggested by the applicant, by itself, it cannot be a ground to cancel the anticipatory bail. Application is rejected. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)