IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.NO. {ggZQOOS Single 'Bench Aggell - /The D1rector 6n Apphcant No 4) Tam11 Nadu Rajya Panvahan Nlgam "XE {Madural D1v1s1on\ L No 19 Tlruanantpuram Road Post Barlu rCLdJ Tlnelveh - 627 003 (T.N.) Versus ' l ! ‘ z». Réspbndents 1/(01airrgant) 1. /' Subhash Prasad Satpati, / S/o Mitraban Satpati, ‘ Aged about 45 V6ars Occupatlon Watch Repalr, R/ o Vluage Chltwaul, P S Tamnar, Tehsil — Gharghoda, Dist : Raigarh—(CGJ ’ - Raj Kumar Thakur 2/ S/o Shlvnarayan Thakur 7 R/o vmage 33 Khuldabad Allahabad Dist : Aiihabad—(U.P) ((li9n Applicant) SantoshKumar S/o R.Da11dra. Occupation R/ o Vardhman Dist : Vardhman Branch Manager National Insurance Co.Ltd., Mobin Mahal, G.E.Road, Raipur, Dist : Raipur-(C.G.) 5 Algar Swami ’ ’ S/o Velapan Aged about 27 years, R/o 1 /49 Purv Ka rasta Gali Chinta Karle Seta Patti Madurai, Dist : Madurai—(1N) MISC. APPEAL U/ S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Ax. Rs WW Rs 15 00 Claim in Appeal Fees Court fees paid W XI-HC-22 mmiofwm $aafatrané¥r I g l3IO4/2006 Non€ for the partms ‘ 'Qnce the case has bee ~ Elay, but for want of prosecu passed over i , for the a§pellemt Therefoxf :appegrance of, the appenant . Raju 1 ‘ \g V Now the ease has been calleo mif again, but none appeais " the ap§ea1 is dieihigsed for nail: Sdl- V.K. Shrivastava Judge l 1 1 W \ ' [me-em“ n called out dumlg the course of the hon on hehalf of the appellant 1t wasu