THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.646 of 2007 ORDER: The present Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the order, dated 03.01.2007, dismissing I.A.No.359 of 2006 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, in R.C.No.628 of 1999, on the file of II Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, seeking to condone the delay of 457 days in bringing the legal representatives of the first petitioner. Main reason shown by the petitioners is that having regard to pendency of the second appeal, the application for condonation of delay in bringing on record the legal representatives of the first petitioner could not have been filed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that subsequent to dismissal of I.A.No.359 of 2006, the petitioners have also filed separate eviction petition being R.C.No.485 of 2007. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the second appeal was dismissed as long back as on 14.03.2006. Having heard the learned counsel and perused the material, especially in view of the fact that the petitioners have taken recourse, as submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents, by filing fresh eviction petition, it is not necessary to prosecute the present Civil Revision Petition. However, it is made clear that none of these proceedings come in the way of considering the grounds as urged in R.C.No.485 of 2007 filed by the petitioners. Subject to the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, ACJ 18th NOVEMBER, 2010. kvni