•^ PBTITIONER IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BJLASPUR (C.G.) r it Pet it lon No. -^^ ^/ tf ^D 2 * : Ranjeet, aged 30 years S/o Shri Gaakaran Ahlrwar/ Schedaled Caste Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Pauni, Tahs il p andax' iya, Distt <, Kawardha (C.G.). RESPONDENTS; ^^' -^.-'***'7 .^.•^''^-^ .^.^i^^' ^v-:^" •^ '" VE R S US :^(1) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The aecretary, Panchayat Mantralaya, D»K<S. Buiiding, Ralpur (C.G.). (2) Collector, Kawardha, Dis 11 <, Kawardha CC»G* ) ^ ^' WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF YHE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA : ,teiZ: ^' XI-HC-22 3?T^T'^T r<TiJ5h ^^ 's^Hicb <yi^a ,^ ^^ ^il41d<4, ^^<l<o, I^TRTy 3^T 'q^? , ^..^.P...^....i^.....^ 200J '^^T' WR^T ^rHlch H^?T <3fl^I ^^<tt^< <1<^n DB: Hon'Me Jwttee K. H. te Hon'bte Justlce L. C. 15/10/a003 Petitioner by Shri M. D\ Respondents by Shrji GeneraL Heaid on I.A.No. 3358^2003. Sy this interiocutoiy a^pttcatfon tlie petitK>n bec»use aflser Kawardha has passed fhe nuU and void. The aipySacatio incorporated in fhe memo of] By this writ petitioi Coustitutaon of India th4 constitutional validitv and tie Chhatdsgarh Panctiayat Raj (for short 'fhc Adhmwam) w^sch eiigiblc to bc axi officc-bcarcil two Uviiag children one of January, 2001. The cbaBeag^ iii view of fhe low laid dcwn b1 Javed and others V». Statej oh<^td^1vl HWvS ^ <fe1^ <R>it$« '^>3ipOT3^?r I. K<ar(Utt®a,C^J. hadoo, J. Sharma, Advocate. Suml Smha, Additional Advocate fhe petifioner seeks to amend filjmg of ibss writ petition fhe Collector, fi»ial order dated 25.11.2002, which is io|a is aUowed. Necessaiy amendment be frefition. under Ardclcs 226/227 of the petitioners have chaUenged the vircs of Section 36 (l)(m) of fhe |Avam Gram Swaraj Adluniyam, 1993 lays dcywn that no person shaU bc of fhe Panehayat wfao has inorc fhan is boni on or afier 26th day of to fhe above clause d<^s not survive ^thoxa fhe Hon'ble Apex Coiirt in tfae case of of Haryaaui aaid otliers rejiorted In p XI-HC-22 sTi^r^T [<rii?h ^Tli?? ^^i^ ^a "5^ ^il14M<4, ^<l^^, fa<nt<iy 3iT^?r XHT^ _..^.f.. WWff ^Ntcfe •M 2003 (ci^^ar* 3^1 W^IW •Hfea -z. <t»l<4i<!l<il^1RTO^Jt ^ fs^ if^RgH i?3rf;<W3n^T 2003 AIR 8CW 3892 and ala^ in vkw of thc ordcr passcd by this Court in tfae case of Yaarfihnuat KtMBttur (taliia V». Otate of 2n WHt Pettttott Mo. 4€3 of ChSaaMiaywh and anothw -.-(71 ^.'7^ aooa. ^ ^ <ilr-&J The secx>nd chaUenge c^ oxder passed by fhe CoHector,] The petitioner has admitfed has been filed by fhe petiti<| provisioH of Section 36 (l)(m)| F fhe petitioner is agaiast fhe fibaal Kawardha on 25th November, 2002. fhat fhe fhiid child was bora on 1,6.2001 aad a certificate to tl(is eflTect, issued by fhe village-Kotwar >ner as AnnexuTe P/3. As pcr fhe no person shaU be eligible to be an office-bearCT of tfae Panch^r^t who faas morc tlian two liviiig / childrcn one ofwhom is bom4 Smce the tbird cluld to the] thereforc ia view of fhe above u or after 26th day ofjanuaiy, 2001. petitioner was bom on 1.6,2001 pxovisioii the petitfoner has incurred disqualification for bcing ani ofl^cc bcarer of tfaic P&ncheyafc In view of thc above tlMtxc w no ftxrcc in Ae pctitkMd of the petitkiiier, fhe saxae is Mable ^o be dismissed and it is dismissed. However, the petitioner shatt b^ at Itberty to file aa appeal before the Director of Pemchayat against tfae order dated 25th November, 2002 by which fhey have been decls|red disquaUfied to continue as ofiBce ^} XI-HC-22 's^n^r'^T f^n^^n^T s^^ict5 <HRa ^^^ T 7W ^^ ^ll41d4, ^Tll^4i<o> fa<nt^y 31T^T XR(^ ...^?f....5.?^./ HtH<?1t ^»W% •^ 2003 ^^T* ^n^T'^iTW^ter ^ bcarer of fhe ViUagc Panchay^t Kawardha, The petitioner wip Umitatk>n for the time spent bit fhis writ piToceediag. The pardes are entifled t^r certified copy of this order, <3t»l<4(<n<ftn *iW^ "? 'fe^t' ifa^K ^ 3iF^H Sf^^ Paixni, Tahsfl- Randariya, Distdct" be eatitled to fhe beaefit of fhe hiin in Mtigating before this Court ia Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tft^ ^Rsi^l