Civil Revision No. 5592 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 5592 of 2011 Date of decision:- 17.10.2011 Ranjit Singh ....Petitioner Vs. Sohan ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate, with Mr. Ajay Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 11.08.2011 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nakodar, dismissing the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Having perused the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner had applied for impleading Pawanjit Kaur wife of Tejpal Singh as party defendant, being a subsequent vendee. The trial Court, while protecting the rights of the petitioner, had observed in the order that if the defendant has executed any sale deed during the pendency of the suit, then the same would suffer from the principle of lis pendence and the subsequent vendee is bound by the lis in view of the provisions contained in Section 52 Civil Revision No. 5592 of 2011 2 of the Transfer of Property Act. In view of the safeguard, as put up by the trial Court vide impugned order, this petition is hereby dismissed. At the same time, in order to safeguard the rights of Pawanjit Kaur wife of Tejpal Singh, lest she may remain uncontested, the Court would issue notice to her and if she so likes to be impleaded as party, the Court would implead her as party defendant. (A.N.JINDAL) October 17, 2011 JUDGE ajp