IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41269 of 2008 PINTU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.10.2008 Heard Mr. C. Mohantha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. Petitioner’s name appears in the statement of the co-accused Nago Yadav, who named other persons also who were firing at the police party. The contention is that there could be many reasons for being implicated falsely by the co-accused including some personal ill- will. The second contention is that in the face of the allegation there was no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner. Let petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Saharsa, in connection with Sour Bazar P.S. case no.58 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )