1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 862 of 2009 Suresh Vittal Tadge & anr. ...Petitioners v/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Respondents Mr. Ditendra Mishra for the petitioners. Ms. Trupti Puranik for the respondents. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED:- June 9, 2009. P.C. Heard Counsel for the Petitioners. 2. No fault can be found with the opinion recorded by the Authority that there is not even a single contemporaneous document to establish the fact that the structure was in existence prior to 17/4/1964. It is accepted position that no prior permission of the Competent Authority was obtained before erecting structure on the site. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners is unable to point out any document such as 2 the Census Report or any other official document to establish the existence of structure prior to 17/4/1964. 4. Hence, no interference is warranted. Dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)