IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 7419 of 2008. Decided on: 08.12.2010. _________________________________________________________ Raj Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus The Govt. of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. M.G. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J.(Oral): Petitioner is suffering disability to the extent of 40%. He has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 as Part-Time Sweeper. Respondent No.4 was selected according to the reply filed by the respondent-State, on merit. The fact of the matter is that the petitioner should not have been overlooked only for the reason that he was handicapped having disability of 40%. Rather, his case should have been considered sympathetically. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the case of the petitioner 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - sympathetically for the same post in any Government Ayurvedic Dispensary in and around his residence, taking into consideration his disability, within a period of two months from today. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 08, 2010. (sck).