Petitioner CATWE AggLmWR IN iiiEgiaH COURT OF JUDI wRiT PiTlTION No. \95 /2om $teel Authority of lndia Limited Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai. District Burg, represented by Executivg’Directorv(Finance) Respondents u c V,JMJ/ I Nb” / r m r 1 4- M »- - , , « ¢u , , , /«w V NVWWN THEECONSTHUTEN oFgggig am $‘93"?%“ ‘ ”M EmW4 ,/AAA - &f&§§ n’ —Versus- 1. Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Raipur 2. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Durg. 3. State of Chbattisgarh (Successor of State of Madhya Pradesh) through Secretary, Vani3yaKar Vibbag, Raipur. WBIT PETITTON UNDER ARTXCLES§226 AND 222 OE, W ( ‘ L4 ~ / , , , Wv¢ w p f, / M .amm w.:.€.-.m:.§§.&x\&ooo W1 zoo mmm V ’ mm1¥fwam émmanéa 0 1 .0 1 .2004 Shri Ashish Shrivastava with Miss. Rupal Singh, counsel for the mtitioner. Shri Gautam Bhaduri Deputy Advocate General for the State. This order shall als dispose of W.P.No.2521/2000, 153/2001, 155/2001 and 156/2001, as the matter is identical. Petitioners’have flled these writ petitions against the order dated 08.3.2001 pass by the Additional Commissioner in Revision challenging the levy of entry tax @ 10% on Slow Silica Lime Stones and H Silica Lime Stones‘and other questions upheld in t revision by the Additional Commissioner. It is submi ed that on representations made " by the petitioners, the Sta Government has agreed to settle the dispute outside the c and on such set‘lement it was decided to reduce the rate o entry tax from 10%t0 6% subject to the condition that petitio ers withdraw the wlrrigpetitions. Accordingly, learned c unsel for the petitioners want to withdraw these writ petitio s and pray that the matter be remitted back to the Additional Commissioner for reconsideration of other isues. The applications for the purpose have also been filed {Tile éfev‘i i h o