IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9447 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 26, 2011. Teestinder Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Tribhawan Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner claims her appointment as a Physical Training Instructor which was rejected way back in September, 2007 on the plea that she possesses the qualification of B.P.Ed. The petitioner relies upon a Full Bench decision of this Court dated 5.2.2010 rendered in CWP No.3077 of 2008 (Ranjit Singh and others versus The State of Punjab and another) and connected cases in which somewhat similar issue has been answered in her favour. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to treat this writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and to re-consider her claim in the light of the CWP No.9447 of 2011 [2] aforesaid Full Court decision of this Court in Ranjit Singh and others' case (supra), within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that in case the respondents decide to give appointment to the petitioner, no arrears of salary shall be paid to her. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 26, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE