^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONERS RESPONDENTS WRIT PETmON No. 3697 of2003 : 1. Urmila Bai w/o Mangal Singh Gond Age 40 years. 2. Chandan Singh S/o Mangal Singh Gond, Age 38 years. Both R/o village KotagaoCL R.I. Circle Rajhara: Tehsil Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Mantora Bai D/o Baratoo Gond, Age 70 years. 2. Jliagaroo S/o Itwari Gond, Age 60 years. Both r/o village Kotagaon, Tehsil BAlod, Distt. Durg. 3. Baishakhin Bai W/o Mangal Sing Gond, Age 65 years, R/o Village Kuwa Gondi, Tehsil Balod, Distt. Durg. 4. State of C.G. (ClAattisgarh) Tlirough CoUector,Durs(C.G.) PETmON UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aairihotri. J. Present: Shri N.S.Dhurandhar, Advocate for the petitioners. Sbri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the'Stat&'respondent No.4 --^- ORALQRDriR (Passed on 28th day of Jaauary, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seefcs pennission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that with the passage oftime, this petition has become infiTictuous. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 2. It is ordered. 3. Accordingly, fhe petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Consequently, M(W)P No. 3334/2003, also stands dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Judge Agiiiliiotri A.TTJt