-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.55 of 2008 Mr.Mahesh Verma ..Petitioner vs. 1. The Additional Commissioner and others ..Respondents Shri Anurag Jain for petitioner. Shri R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 25th January, 2008 25th January, 2008 25th January, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Shri Jain after taking instructions from the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner will vacate the licenced premises by 7th May, 2008. 2. Shri Jain makes a further statement that within a period of 4 weeks from today, the petitioner will pay to respondent no.3/licensor a sum of Rs.1,34,000/- 3. Needless to state that respondent no.3 is allowed to withdraw the sum of Rs.1,56,000/- deposited in this Court along with accrued interest. -2- 4. Further needless to add that if the sum of Rs.1,34,000/- is not paid within a period of four weeks from today then the order of the Competent Authority dated 9th January, 2007 shall become operative and the petitioner would be obliged to pay the sums thereunder. It would be open for respondent no.3 to recover the amount in accordance with law so also evict the petitioner from the subject premises. 5. The complaint under sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is pending. That complaint, if the above amounts are paid shall be disposed of in accordance with law by the Magistrate concerned. However, if the amounts are not paid, then, the complaint to proceed in accordance with law. It is only upon the petitioner paying the aforesaid sums that he is allowed time to vacate till 7th May, 2008. Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)