IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.21 of 2007. Appeal from Order No.21 of 2007. Appeal from Order No.21 of 2007. Mr.Rohit Anand & Anr. ..Appellant versus Mrs.Sharmila Anilkumar Gupta ..Respondent. Mr.S.G.Ghogre for the Appellant Mrs.Baxi for Respondent No.1. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 21st August, 2007 Dated : 21st August, 2007 Dated : 21st August, 2007 P.C. . Heard both the learned advocates. 2. Perused the papers as well as the previous orders passed in the matter. 3. Perused the undertaking given by the appellant-the original defendants. The appellants have undertaken that now they will only carry out the electrical work, (the appellants have made it clear that they are not going to do concealed wiring) furniture, carpentry and painting work. 4. Hence, besides the work mentioned in the undertaking the appellants should not do any other work. While doing the above mentioned work the -2- appellants should not cause any damage to the building in question and should carry out the said work during the period from 10.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. so that no nuisance is caused to the adjoining flat owners. 5. The Secretary or the Chairman of the Society is allowed to inspect the suit site with prior intimation, just only to see as to what type of work is going on and not for any other purpose. 6. In view of the above, the A.O. is disposed of, so also the civil application. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)