IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3126 of 2006 SUDHIR KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 4.9.2008 Petitioner was aggrieved by non payment of his bill allegedly totaling about Rs. 55 lakhs in relation to facility extended for election purposes. Writ application of the petitioner was disposed of on 9.3.2005 with a direction to the District Magistrate to consider the same and pass a speaking order and if any money is due, make payment thereof. This application was filed by the petitioner on the ground that though opposite party no.2, District Magistrate, Lakhisarai passed an order , he has not fully applied his mind to the claim of the petitioner and has rejected the claim of the petitioner. In my view, order having been passed and if petitioner is aggrieved, he may take recourse, as he may be advised, but certainly contempt application does not lie. The application stands dismissed. SINGH (Navaniti Prasad Singh , J.)