R.A No. 52 of 2009 in C.W.P No. 4259 of 1990 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.A No. 52 of 2009 in C.W.P No. 4259 of 1990 Date of decision : July 23, 2009 Vinod Bala and others, ...... Applicants v. State of Punjab and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. M.S.Sindhu, Addl.A.G Punjab for the respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This review application has been filed for reviewing the judgment dated 10.12.2008 passed in CWP No.4259 of 1990. Counsel for the applicants states that in fact when the writ petition was heard, the services of the petitioners had already been regularized and, thus, the writ petition was liable to be dismissed as infructuous. This fact is accepted by the respondents in their reply to the present review application. Even though the judgment dated 10.12.2008 does not suffer R.A No. 52 of 2009 in C.W.P No. 4259 of 1990 ::2:: from any error apparent on the face of the record, yet in the facts and circumstances of the case it cannot but be held that on 10.12.2008, the writ petition had actually been rendered infructuous. Consequently, this review application is allowed and CWP No.4259 of 1990 is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. ( AJAY TEWARI ) July 23, 2009. JUDGE `kk'