cS> ,cl ^ t <l IN 'EHE. HON*BLE HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGASH S AT BIIASPUR. WRIT PETITION N0. -Loc/2—/2002. PETITIONER Kuldeep Kumar Jaiswal^ S/o Shri Rapaeshwar Prasad Jaiswal^ Aged about 48 years^ S/o Indore (M,P<) • Presently Residing at PaGhmadi Roa<3» Pipariya (M.P.) Vs. - SPQNDENTS ^^^/- ^^y ^,.^^^ s ^l) • State of Chhattisgarh Through s The Colleetor^ Raigarh (C.G.). ^' 1.^ >.- . - ^ •<'• • .. ,..-^ 6-- •^.. ^ :r\: '^ [vv 2) • Smt;, Sachi Jaiswaly W/o Shri Kuldeep Kumar Jaiswal^ Aged atoout 30 years^ R/o Ganja Chowk, Raigarh(C.G«)• 3)» Rameshwar Prasad/ S/o Jagannath Prasad Jaiswal^ Aged aboyt 72 years. " 4)• smt^ Shakuatala Devi W/o Shri Ramesfoirar Prasad Jaiswal^ Aged about 70 years* .d- 5)^ Dilip Kumar^ S/o Rameshwar Prasad Jaiswal» Aged about 50 Yrs 6)• smt^ Shasbi^ W/o Dilip Kumar Jaiswal^ Agedabout 45 years<i 7) e Vineet^ S/o Shri Rai^eshwar Prasad Jaiswal^ Aged about40 Yrs<. 8). Pradeep^ S/o shri Racaeshwar Prasad Jaiswal^ Aged abovt 37 Yrs 9). Rajdeep, s/o Shri Rainetohwar Prasad Jaiswal, Aged about 35 Yrs O) 2 - 10) • Hasmykh^ S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad Jaiswal, Aged about 32 Yrs< All l^/o Pipariya» Tehsil : Pipariya^ Distt* Hoshaagabad (M«P<)• ..^"' ^-^" WKCT PETITION U »ER ARZtCUSS 226 AND 227 OF THE CQNSTITU* KON OF IHDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI^ MANDAMUS* PROHIBITION ETC< • AND FOR APPROPfeCATE DISECTIONS OR OBDERS TO DO JUS'EECE IN THE BV^TTER. XI-HC-22 /-. '^Ti^'oFT f^Tii<=fr» ^n^r 5bR1eh ^f^a ^.•! -<-) Soma +- .^ 'W^t ^WM^, ^^w\^ i^W^y a^ni^T xnr^ NtM^I,*Ni*-^4^/-"""""""^ ^°<2_ (cj^^'r 3:n^T '^r^R ^T[ 16.07^2002. Shri Prashant Jaiswal, couns^l Shri 6autam Bhaduri, 60 respondenT No.l. i Heard- In view of the admitted remedy is ovailable before this Cou|rt 482 of Cr.P.C., the Court is not incl| advised that the petitioner may a^ of CrP.C< in accordance with law* Court is not expressing any opinio| case. Th©petition is finally dispose|j of/accordingiy, chHt<vi<iiit1 NH^ff^ '^St^^^: lir ^ri^pT 3T?^r ^l for the petitioner. l^t. Advoca-te for the State / position tiiat equally efficacious by way of petition under Section |ned to enter-tain the petition. It is Mt the remedy under Section 482 s |It is however/made ciear that the [i on the merits of the petitioner's Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [^fR-^^