IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5929 of 2009 SHYAM SUNDER THAKUR, SON OF LATE SUBEDAR THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TIWARI CHAKIYA, P.S. HUSSEPUR, P.S. BHOREY, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. ---PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SARAN AT CHAPRA, DISTRICT SARAN. 5. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 6. HEADMASTER, SRI SHANKER HIGH SCHOOL, CHAKIYA HUSSEPUR, P.S. BHOREY, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 7. SRI SHANKER HIGH SCHOOL, CHAKIYA HUSSEPUR, P.S. BHOREY, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ THROUGH ITS HEADMASTER. 8. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 9. TREASURY OFFICER, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. ----------- 2. 12.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State. The only grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the payment of G.P.F. amount. It is submitted that necessary application for final withdrawal of G.P.F. amount was submitted by the petitioner. However, the amount of G.P.F. is still remained unpaid. The learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be looked into in the light of the representation dated 17th of March, 2009, as contained in Annexure 2 series. Considering the submissions of the parties, the 2 petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation separately before the District Education Officer, Gopalganj (respondent no.5) as well as the District Provident Fund Officer, Gopalganj (respondent no.8) within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.5 as well as respondent no.8 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of by a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation of the petitioner finds favour, the respective respondents shall issue necessary orders, so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to payment of provident fund dues could be settled without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)