IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2008 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 749 of 2008() ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/11/2007 IN CMP 2217/2007 IN MC.725/2005 FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... PETITIONER: RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------- YAKKIPARAMBAN MUHAMMED, S/O.AVARANKUTTY KIZHUPARAMBU AMSOM, THRUKKAIYOOR DESOM KIZHUPARAMBA. BY ADV. SRI.P.SAMSUDIN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS & STATE ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THADIYANPURATH SAINABA, D/O.MAMMATH EDAVANNA AMSOM, DESOM, EDAVANNA P.O. MALAPPURAM DIST. 2. LINSHIDA, 17 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN MOTHER 1ST RESPONDENT. 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. PUZHAKKARA MUHAMMED THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.749 of 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 11th day of March, 2008 ORDER The petitioner, who is the father of the 2nd respondent and the husband of the 1st respondent, challenges Annexure A5 order dated 2.11.2007 passed by the Family Court, Malappuram directing the petitioner to pay the entire arrears of Rs.28,000/- on or before 30.11.07. The objection raised by the petitioner regarding limitation was overruled by the Magistrate by placing reliance on the decision by the Apex Court in Shanta v. Sivanagappa (2005(4) SCC 468). 2. I am not inclined to interfere with the order of dismissal passed by the learned Magistrate. This Crl.M.C is accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner is, however, given one month's time from today to deposit the sum of Rs.28,000/-(Rupees twenty eight thousand only) before the Family Court, Malappuram. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj