® ') v5P BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITLON (S)No.'23Mfc /2010 PETITIONER A- ^. ^^y '"^-""" RESPONDENTS : ^ Smt. Kanta Singh, aged about 62 years, W/o Shir Sardar Singh, Resident of Near Oswal Bhawan, Geedam, Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan; Raipur (C.G.) Assistant commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Dantewarda, District Dantewada (C.G.) Block Education Department, Tribal Development Block, Geedam, District Dantewada (C.G.) ^. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLEJ26 OF TJ-IE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. The above named Petifioner respectfullysubmits as under:- 4- r \ .-il<6' ^ST '<ii<i]<?i<i, yTll'(-l<l<o, [qciK-iy ..\j..e..&...t±.:...32r.y...^ sn^r'q^i' (kyf-i«i<itt) TOdW^lf^ICT^I SBiHon'ble Shri Mtuiladira MoUm Shtl^astava. J. 06.07.2010 Shri Anup Majiimdar, Smt. Sinlta Gbai, Panel advance copy. couubel L^wyi Heard. By fhis petition, the cominunication dated 19<11 respondent No.2/Asstetant Daatewada in the office of OfBcer to lodge report iu the comnuttmg fi-aud. Subinission of leanied time of iiutial appoiutoient, iu thej recorded as 5.5,1947, but later of birfh is 4th August, 1950. On| respondent inade soiue inquiry 25.4.2009. Petitioner submltted treating hls date ofbirfh. as 4th petitioner was retired w.e.f. 31.! 5.5.1947 as or^maBy recorded io| <<ii<<l<n<fl-i Ml*4cff ^f fe(A <i<i(ii< ^sffinsii^f for fhe petitioner. 'er for fhc State/respoadents, on petidoner has chatlenged the Janu|aiy, 2010 (Annexure P-1) by which C<|>nuiussioncr, Tribal Developinent, CollecltDr has directed fhe Block Education IpoUce station on thc allegation of coitasel for fhe petitioner te fhat at the service records, ttie date ofbirfh was oiji, fhe petittoner clatmed fhat her date such claun raised by the petitioner; s(ud gave a notice to fhc petitioner on his reply, but petitioner's claim Aijigust, 1950 was not accepted and fhc .^.2009 tTcating her date of birfh as fh.e semce book. •» -:~^sf '^-ae^' 311^1 W WM WIt 311^1 **<!<* ~S'^ '*ll<1l<l1<1, ®T)1'M'IB,ftdiyy 3ii^?rT^? (yf^i^F) TOIIW ^lfCT 311^1 z. Leamed counsel for the have wrongly Cftine to fhe co4 service by committing fi-aud registration ofcrinunal case is iU< p^titiom {titioner subnuts that the respondents (clusion fhat the petitioner obtamed |and such cominunlcation directing feal. On flie offaer hand, suh( respondents is fhat finni thej throughout service, petitioner and on that basis also started claiming anofher date oj petitioner, the Aufhorily has committed fiaud and has case. obteinlsd coiDie therefolre qiNmN WMf Ti fe^'rfw?": ^affiro ail^l .htaus cfeimed Imission of leamed counsel for fhe records, it is clear fhat though her date of birth as 5.5.1947 employment, later on, petitioner f birfh and after inquiry agaiust the to the conclusion fhat fhe petitioncr directed for registration of ciiminal I have heanl learned cou^sel for fhe parties aad perused fhe records. Froin the impugaed conuni appears that fhe respondent No.2t conclusion that fhe petitioner coji firom fhe records fhat when the birfh as 4.8.1950, a notice was by the Block Education Ofi&cei] docunients etc. lucation dated 19th Januaiy, 2010, it ^/AssMtant Gommissioner came to fhe 'olmmitted fi-aud. It is abso discemable ^etitioner started claiming hcr date of i^sued to fhe petitioner on 25.4.2009 scekiag her clarificatious, or^inal 4- XS-SIC—7S '3'^ "i<|A|lcl'4, ®Tll'(H'l<o, fslMiyy 3)I^?T 1ra^ ( yif^'Ki'I) sn^r ^T Ri-ii* '?T«H'STT^T sFqf^i' Pravee'n ^J l^iiwdftd sn^i ?• petitio4er has Wliefher or not the be considered by fhe Investigati4g restraia respondents fi»mappT(}achm; coiniufasion of offence. tf fhe petltione to registration of crunmal case, reinedy as laay be avaflable to hi^n Wifh fhe aforesaid obse: disposed oflF. ^iN^pftT TTW?if ^f fS1c3t <T^^I< ^sfRman^r couunitted fi"aud, is a matter to Agency. However, thte Court canaot achiag the poUce on any allcgation of itioner has aay gricvaace with regard petitioner naay take recoiirse to such under fhe ]aw. tvations, fhe petition staads finalfy Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava —Judge ^