1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Contempt Petition No. 35 of 2006 (Ku. Shalini Vithalrao Akre Vs. Madhukar Sukhdeorao Abhyankar & 2 ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.N. Ansari h/f Mr. H.D. Dangre, Adv. For petitioner. Mr. Anjan De, Adv. For R- 1 to 3. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 6 th January, 2009 Shri Ansari holding for Shri H.D. Dangre, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner has already withdrawn the Writ Petition No. 4080/2003, and in such circumstances, it is necessary to drop the contempt proceedings against the respondents. Considered the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the fact that the petitioner has withdrawn the Writ Petition No. 4080/2003 and in view of the submissions made by the respondents in the instant petition, it is necessary to drop the contempt 2 proceedings against the respondents. The contempt proceedings against the respondents are hereby dropped. Contempt petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE RMP