IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10600 of 2011 Ajay Chaudhary, son of Late Paltan Chaudhary, resident of Village- Sundarpur Ratwara, Police Station-Pear, District- Muzaffarpur. . ……………………….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 06. 04. 2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pear P.S. Case No. 105 of 2010 registered under Section 47 (A) of the Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 14. 01. 2011. It is further submitted that allegation is that 25 pouches of country made liquor containing 200 ml. and 2 pouches containing 400 ml. alleged to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner. However, in the order dated 14. 01. 2011 instead of 5 liters 800 ml. liquor it has wrongly been typed as 50 liters in the said order. Hence it appears that 50 liters has wrongly been typed or it appears to be typographical mistake about 5 liters 800 ml. has been recovered and hence contends that amount of liquor recovered from the 2 house of the petitioner is very little. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, however, since the amount of liquor is too little as 5 liters 800 ml. hence, the petitioner is directed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and if the petitioner surrender and pray for regular bail then the court below shall disposed of the bail petition on same day taking into consideration that only 5 liters 800 ml. liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. With the above direction, the bail petition is disposed of. m.p. ( Gopal Prasad, J.)