IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR f' ( ^ ^ (CHHATTISGARHl W.P' (fejl£.'7</9/2008 ® PETITIONER ^^ .0.^ " ^•""a^ Q----' RESPONDENTS : Vishnu Yadav, S/o. Shri Shivraj Yadav, aged about 45 years, R/o. Village - Khamaria, P.S. - Kusmunda, Tahsil - Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS : (1)^ Saheb Lal, S/o. Shri Itwari, aged about 36 years, R/o. Village - Kurma, P.S. - Baloda, Tahsil & Distt. - Janjgir Champa, (C.G.) >) Commissioner for Workman Compensation Act 1923 -cum- Labour Court, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 READ WITH ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INt)IA .^.^..i.^-^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITiONER WRirPETmON' (L)NO. 744^0F,2Q08 Vlshnu Yadav RESPONDENTS Versus •Saheb LaS&Another (VVrit Petltion under Article 226 read with Articae 227 ofthe Constitution of Indla) Singie Bench : Hon'ble-Shn Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present;- Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri D. Minj, counsel for the respondent No.1. (ORAU on thls 24th day of February, 2010) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permisslon of this Court to withdraw this petstlon witn Slberty to take recourse to aiternatlve statutory forum that may be avaiiable to hlm under the provisions of iaw. ,2) It is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordlngjy, the wrlt petitlon'ls dismissed as withdrawn'with the aforesald ilberty. Ho'wever, it is made clear that the iimitation will not come in the way, 'if the petltloner approaches the appropriate forum withln a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, intenm order passed eariier vacacea. Gowrl Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge