IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.554 of 2004 Between : 1 Lavudya Bhikya Nayak, S/oBalu Naik, R/o.H.No3-144, Waddepally, Banjara Colony, Hanmakonda, Warangal Dist. 2 Bhukya Shankar, S/o.Kistu, R/o.Waddepally, Banjara Colony, Hanmakonda, Warangal District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Kakatiya Urban Development Authority, rep.by its Vice Chairman, Warangal. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District. 3 The Panchayat Secretary, Komatipally Panchayat, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. 4 The District Manager, State Housing Corporation Ltd., Warang Housing Board Colony, Hanmakonda, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the respondents in issuing revised layout in D.P.No.29/2002 in File No.C.288/2002 in Ref.No.B2-1390/2002 by revising layout D.P.No.6/96 as arbitrary illegal and set-aside the same and direct the respondents to abide by the original layout in D.P.No.6/96 in Sy.No.15, Waddepally village, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR.K.K.MAHENDER REDDY&PERI PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents : MR.C.NARENDER The Court made the following : ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for petitioners that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th July 2009 ajr