IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1790 OF 2009 Between: Vandanapu Rama Rao ..... Petitioner AND Vandanapu Sudhakar & 5 others .....Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1790 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner – plaintiff Vandanapu Rama Rao against the order dated 05-03-2009 in O.S. No. 9 of 2005 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Khammam refusing to mark the document styled as a partition list, which in fact is a partition deed. 2. At the request of the petitioner himself, the document in question was sent to Revenue Divisional Officer for impounding and whenthe Revenue Divisional Officer directed for payment of stamp duty and penalty, he failed to pay the same and sought the document to be marked, which was rightly disallowed by the trial Court. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that on account of lack of knowledge, petitioner sent the document for impounding and that it does not attract any stamp duty as it is only a partition list. 4. Admittedly, the petitioner himself has sent the document in question for impounding and the finding of the trial Court is that it is not a “partition list” but it is a “partition deed” and when he was asked to pay stamp duty and penalty, he turned around and took a different stand, which is untenable. 5. In the circumstances, there are, absolutely, no grounds to entertain this revision and is accordingly dismissed. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J August 4, 2009. PV