FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10456 OF 2010 “Mariba s/o. Anna Navale Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.S.Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for the respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 25TH NOVEMBER, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner has filed the present petition for issuance of a writ of Mandamus to the respondents to determine the amount of compensation in respect of the various trees mentioned in the prayer clauses. The petitioner is having an apprehension that while determining the compensation payable for the land which would be acquired by the respondents, the valuation of the trees will not be taken into consideration. 2] The stage of the proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act are only up to notice under Section 9. While determining the compensation payable to the petitioner and passing an award, the Collector would be bound to take into consideration all aspects including the trees, if any. If the petitioner is not satisfied, he will have a remedy under Section 18 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10456 OF 2010 “Mariba s/o. Anna Navale Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 of the Land Acquisition Act. We , therefore, find that the petition is wholly premature in nature and hence, the petition is dismissed inlimine. [R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-