IN THE HIGH COURT OF CH HATTISGARM AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. 61 /2.006 PETITIONER l<?^......--f"""' ...."^'^•s^fe^- ^t^;;..--— RESPONDENTS / ^co^ \^\Gk. ^.^•^ R..P. Singh, S/o.P.M. Singh Aged about 53 years Head Master, Govt. Primary School Kondekasa, Block- Daundi, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS :1.5tate of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education D.K.S., Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) '. Block Development Education Officer, Tribal Welfare Department Daundi, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner Office of Collector Tribal Department-Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 311^1 ^iT [<•)[+ 3Dt?r s^'4 ^lf?^ p.1-1- T •3S[ TqpII^pT,' ^aNFIS; fayjfig?: WVM »*1|ch 3)1^1 fRIRR ^Tf?^ 6-1-2008 Shri Bharat Lal Dembra, coilnsel for the Detitioner Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel L4wyer, for the State on advance copy. Heard. Learned counsel for the oetltioner stated that the Detitioner has not been paid the salary from 20/6/200S on^ards. He prays that a direction be issued in this regard. He referred to the docuhient Annex.P/4. On tieing asked the reason; Learned counsel for the No. 3419/2004 may be oalled for. H4 oravs for passina over the mafter. Let the record of W.P. No.3419/2004 be called for. _ As oraved, case is passed o' Later on; Shri B.L. Dembra forthe dietitioner. +ij-ilft'sil-i ^wvS'? fe'st <&I'L<;IJ ^sipwsn^i ]t was stated that the Detitionerwas transferred and he filed tne writ petition bearir|g W.P. No.3419/2004 wherein there was po stay and the department has unilatelral^ relieved him. State sutimits that the recprd of W.P. 'er. Sdl- Fakhrudd'" judge Shri Vivek Shanna, P.L., fpr the State; Record ol'W.P. No.3419/3004 has been received. Leamed counsel for the. petitioner Dointed out that the oetitioner has suppressed the material factl On Derusal ol the record. by the petitioner aiongwith two q 7/1/2005 the statement was mj the Detitioners to the effect that '-^ it reveals that tha writ petition was filed thers aeainst the order of transfer and on ide by the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners have already joined at the respective transferred place and he wants to withdraw the application (M.W.P. No.3004/2004) with Ubehv to file afresh, if reauired. ['qta ir<ai .XI-HC-22 sn^t^i R<-) sj^r ^-4icti '^tf^T H/- ^ ^cg^nqi^ra, y-d1yli<i,It«'ii;'Mi< t<l«i?llailliqi \\1'&_ ^.^..........,..........,...^........^ 3)1^1 ^graCHfgTT -2- itioner submits that the fibove fact was Jitionerand since now it has been noted wlithdraw this petition with liberty to ffle Leanied counsel for the oetil not biuueht to his notice tw the nei he expresses sorry and wants to afresh. Accordingly, the petition sljands disposed Of as withdrawn with libertv as orayed. Reoord ofW.P. No.3419/20C|4 G.C. • ^ii^i^li Tn^ff "^ l^st' <f^^i< ^T siPgir sn^r be sent back to the office. iJS--~-- Sdl- V:a^rudd>" .ludge [^ifirt