IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc.14940-M of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 22, 2008 SUNIL ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Ms. Sumanjit Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Madan Gupta, Sr. DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The facts brought out from the petition indicate that an application under Section 3 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, was filed by the petitioner. After considering the case of the petitioner for release on parole, order dated 21.5.2007 was passed to allow the petitioner parole for house repairs, for four weeks. The petitioner, however, was not informed that the bail bonds were required to be furnished within 6 months from the date of issue of the release order. When the bail bonds were furnished, the period of six months had already elapsed and, in this view of the matter, the release order was not honoured. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the intervening period, the petitioner has not availed parole. The petitioner would furnish Criminal Misc.14940-M of 2007 2 fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, District Jail, Sonepat. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the apprehension of the petitioner that during the rains in the recent past, the house would have been further damaged, it is directed that on furnishing of fresh bail bonds, the petitioner would be released on four weeks parole, on the basis of order dated 21.5.2007 itself. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. August 22, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE