:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 18224 OF 2007 APPEAL (ST.) NO. 18224 OF 2007 APPEAL (ST.) NO. 18224 OF 2007 .......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders .......................................................... Mr. P.M. Palshikar for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. : A.S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY 2008 : 21ST FEBRUARY 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Heard Advocate appearing for the Appellant. 2. By the impugned Judgment and Order dated 3rd April 2007, the learned Judge of the Employees’ State Insurance Court, Mumbai has allowed an application made by the Respondent by which recovery of the amount payable by the Respondent has been stayed till the final disposal of the application under Section 75 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948. The order impugned does not decide the rights and liabilities of the parties. :2: 3. Hence, an appeal under Section 82 of the said Act of 1948 against the said order is not maintainable. The appeal is dismissed only on the ground that the same is not maintainable. This order will not preclude the Appellant from filing appropriate proceedings for challenging the impugned Judgment and Order. 4. All contentions on merits are expressly kept open. JUDGE. JUDGE. JUDGE.