IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37703 of 2008 TEJ NARAYAN PANDEY son of Deo Narayan Pandey Resident of village- Barhara Tola- Kavilasa P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant who has appeared suo motu by filing power. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he started having sexual intercourse with the complainant and continued the same for about three months on the allurement that he will marry her, but later he refused to marry. Learned counsels for the petitioner & the informant submit that the matter was placed under Panchayati and it was found that the case was lodged against the petitioner on account of certain misconception since both the parties are close neighbour. It is further submitted by the parties that the matter has been amicably settled and the informant is not pressing its case. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State - 2 - submits that there is allegation that the informant was subjected to sexual intercourse on the allurement that she would be married and this continued for three months. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Raniganj P.S.Case No. 197 of 2005 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)