^> -<• ~^> ,.^sfl"r ?;-!^ !^'^ -y KISH COL?RT OT CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) Ne. 2199 of 2007 Petitioner Versus AAehottar Rowat S/o Shri Bal Mukund yadav, Agcd about 56 yeara, Post- Asst. Teacher, R/o Vitlage Piyeripali, Post 5<riya Toh. & Oistt. Roi9arh (C.©.) 1. State of Chhattisgar-h Throigh •• Secretary School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipir (C.S.) 2. &istrict Education Officer Raigarh, Mst: Rdgarh- (C.6.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh Oistrict - Raigarh (C.S.) SBs Hon'bte Mr. Justice Sotish K. Agnihotri. Present; Mr. Vivek Kumw P(»idey,Advocote for the petltioner. AAr. Arvind Dubey. Ponel Lawyer for the State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 10th E)ay of Aprii, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein (sto whether ths petittoner is entitted to regula" pay scale w.e.i. the date of initia! appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appear'irg for the petitioner as wetl as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the focts and question of law involved the present writ petition are the same to that of in Vi/. P. (5) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu and others vs. State Sovt. of Chhani^arh fS another), which was allowed vide order dated 12.02.2007. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counse! for the parties, -the writ petition is alla»ed in the some terms. hto order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SKBRB^^