Crl.Misc. No.M-18676 of 2011 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-18676 of 2011 (O&M). Date of decision: July 12, 2011. Sukhbir Singh @ Satbir Singh Taksali. .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab. .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.R.K.Chugh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kiratpal Singh Sidhu, DAG., Punjab. * * * M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). Petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Amarjit Kaur complainant alleging that while the complainant was in jail, she had issued few blank cheques bearing her signatures along with ATM Card. The petitioner was known to her being a neighbourer. The petitioner had taken keys of her house on the pretext that he would look after the house. There are allegations that he had withdrawn the amount of ` 1,39,000/- on the basis of cheques and against ATM Card. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated referring to his antecedents. I have heard the counsel for the petitioner and gone . . . 1 Crl.Misc. No.M-18676 of 2011 (O&M) through the police file. There are certain cheques withdrawn by the petitioner as his signatures appear to be existing behind the bearer cheques. The petitioner has not been able to establish the said transactions. There are allegations of certain articles having been taken away by the petitioner from the house of the complainant. It appears to be a case where the allegations do not appear absolutely false. No extra ordinary exceptional circumstances exist for the grant of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed. However, this order will not, in any manner, prejudice the rights of the petitioner to seek the concession of regular bail in case he surrenders before the Court or the Investigating Officer. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE July 12, 2011. rka . . . 2