1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.337 OF 2008 Mrs.Madhukanta Dahyalal Acharya & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Chandrakant Kantilal Shah & Ors. .. Respondents Mrs.Sunanda Kumbhat with Ms.Meenaz Merchant i/b. Mr.H.G.Ganatra for petitioners Mr.Charanjeet Chandrapal for respondent Nos.1 to 9 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th May 2010. P.C.: 1] This contempt petition alleges that the order passed in Special Civil Suit No.11 of 2008 wherein the petitioners are the defendants and respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are the original plaintiffs, directing both sides to maintain status quo by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane dated 6th February 2008, has been wilfully disobeyed and third party rights have been created allegedly by respondent Nos. 1 to 7 in favour of one Marathon Group. 2] To my mind, if this is an interim order in the special civil suit, petitioners can very well approach the trial court in its jurisdiction under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of CPC and make a grievance with regard to alleged disobedience of the interim order. Granting such liberty and keeping open all pleas to the parties this contempt petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)