IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3168 of 2010 Brajendra Thakur son of Late Panna Lal Thakur, a resident of Mohalla Bidyapati Nagar, Ward No.20, Saharsa East, P.S. & District Saharsa. …….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Ravi Kant, Principal Secretary of Science and Technology Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Dr. Shri Bhagwan Singh, Director of Science and Technology Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Shri Anand Mohan Khan Principal Govt. Polytechnic Saharsa. …….Respondents/Opp.Parties. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate. For the opposite parties : Mr. Himanshu Kumar Akela, A.C. to G.A.-V. ------- 06/ 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the respondents alleging violation of the specific order passed by this court on 24.08.1998 (Annexure-1) in CWJC No.4767 of 1997. 3. It is quite apparent from the said order that the impugned order was set aside with a direction to the respondents to give same treatment to the petitioner what was given to the petitioners of CWJC No.3122 of 1992 without further delay. It transpires that CWJC No.3122 of 1992 was filed by Gupteshwar Singh and others and in view of the order passed in that writ petition the case of the petitioners of that writ petition was considered by the Department of Science and Technology and was found that the appointments of the said petitioners were illegal and - 2 - were cancelled vide order dated 02.02.1994. 4. It transpires that the said action was challenged in CWJC No.3017 of 1994 which was dismissed by a bench of this court on 04.07.1997, against which LPA No.995 of 1997 was filed, but the same also stood dismissed. In the said circumstances, it is quite apparent that there was no occasion of appointment of petitioner of the instant writ petition as his case was to be considered as per the treatment given to the petitioners of CWJC no.3122 of 1992 and the appointments of the said writ petitioners were cancelled. 5. In the said circumstances, this court does not find any merit in this petition which is, accordingly, dismissed. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)