1 WP 2372.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 2372 OF 2011 (Dr. Mrs. Seema W/o Pradeep Joshi VS. North Maharashtra University and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. A.B. Girase, Advocate for the respondent nos.1 &2 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 22.09.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 states that the complaint of the present petitioner could not be decided so far, since the Grievance Committee was not in existence. It is submitted that the Grievance Committee is now in existence. It is further submitted that there are certain amendments made by the University Grants Commission in the relevant Regulation. 2 WP 2372.2011 3. In that view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to make a fresh complaint in accordance with the amended Regulation. The learned counsel undertakes to make the complaint within a period of one week from today. 4. We dispose of the Writ Petition, by directing the Grievance Committee of the respondent no.1 to dispose of the complaint of the petitioner, within a period of six (6) weeks from the receipt thereof. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]