,\ HSGH COURT OF CHHATT3SGARH AT B1LASPUR Coram:- Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ AppeIIant Petjtloner Respondents Writ AppeaS No.366/2009 Ashok Kumar Tandon, S/o Late Puran Lal Tandon, aged about 38 years, R/o Village Kosamkhunta, Post Ganoud, Via-Arang, Distt. Raipur (CG) Versus 1. Chhattisgarh Professionai Examination Board, C-168, Tagore Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3. The District Education Officer, Raipur, Distt.-Raipur (CG) 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Arang District Raipur (CG) Appeal under Section 2 (11 of the Chhattisaarh Hiah Court fADpeal S6 Division Bench) Act. 2006 Present: Shri C.R. Sahu, counsel forthe appellant. Shri S. K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. Oral Order (Passed on 7th of December, 2009) Per Dhirendra IVIishra. J:- This writ appeal is directed .against ttte impugned order dated 6th of October, 2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.5699/2009, whereby the appeliant's writ petition for direction to appoint the appeilant on the vacant post has been dismissed. (2) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant participated in the selection process and his name was ^ "t- included in the waiting list. The appellant fiied the aforesaid petition and pleaded that 101 seats are still vacant in the Sikshakarmi Grade-ilJ. The appeilant participated in the selection process and his name appeared in the waiting list and therefore, the respondents be directed to appoint the appellant on the vacant post of SikshakarmJ Grade-111. (3) Learned single Judge has dismlssed the petitlon with an observation that it is trits law that mere seiection does not confer any right on a candidate for appointment. Even otherwise, the petltioner has not been seiected as admittediy, his name did not find piace in the seiect list. He is in the waiting list and that too, much down beiow and no person from the waiting list has been appointed and therefore, no direction can be Issued to the respondents/authorities to appoint any person from the waiting list as it is not a case of discrimination or arbitrariness. (4) According to our opinion, the finding of the learned Single Judge is strictly in accordance with iaw and the same does not call for any Interference. There Is no substance in this appeai, which deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed. Priya Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge