IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2010 / 3RD ASHADHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7677 of 2009() ------------------------------------------ CRIME NO.2108/2009 OF MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION. .......... PETITIONER --------------------- MADHU CHACKO,S/O.K.K.CHACKO, THAKKADASSERY,KUTTAMANGALAM VILLAGE,KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK,ERNAKULAM(DT.) BY ADV. SRI.P.KESAVAN NAIR (SR.) SRI.K.A.ANAS SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,C.I.OF POLICE MUVATTUPUZHA,REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V. TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2010, ALONG WITH BA NO. 7684 OF 2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss K.HEMA, J. ------------------ B.A. Nos. 7677 and 7684 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2010 O R D E R These Petitions are for anticipatory bail. 2. A crime was registered before the Muvattupuzha Police station on 04.06.2009, on the basis of a complaint filed by de facto complainant alleging offences under Sections 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Thereafter, a private complaint was filed by the de facto complainant before the Magistrate Court alleging offences under sections 375, 376, 493, 496, 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The private complaint was forwarded to the police for investigation, under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The investigation was completed and charge was laid before the trial court. In both the cases petitioner is the accused. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that since both the cases relate to the same incident, both the crimes were clubbed and investigation was conducted as one case. The charge is laid before the trial court and hence, petitioner may be directed to approach the trial court, it is submitted. Petitioner B.A. Nos. 7677 & 7684 / 2009 2 filed B.A. No. 7677/2009, in Crime No. 2108/2009 and B. A. No. 7684/2009, in Crime No. 1070/2009. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is prepared to surrender before trial court and seek appropriate relief. In such circumstances, I find no ground to grant anticipatory bail. Petitioner may move the trial court for appropriate relief. Petitions are disposed of accordingly. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln