HON’BLE SHRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO. 11396 OF 2006 BETWEEN A. Kumaraswamy Naidu ……… Petitioner And The State of A.P. rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Hyderabad & others ………Respondents ::O R D E R :: Counsel for the Petitioner : Shri K. Srinivas for Shri Srinivas Dammalapati Counsel for Respondent No. 1 : Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 : None Dated: 05.09.2006 Per G.S. SINGHVI, CJ In this petition, the petitioner has questioned reconstitution of Kallur I & II Territorial Constituencies of Pulicherla Mandal Parishad. Shri K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner says that the writ petition may be disposed of as infructuous because elections to the disputed Mandal Parishad Territorial Constituency have already been held. In view of the statement of the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, W.P.M.P.No.14157 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ G.V. SEETHAPATHY, J 05.09.2006 ksld