IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17537 of 2011 Raju Kumar Ghosh @ Raju Ghosh, Son of Mahesh Chandra Ghosh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 29.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was allowed bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 120(B), 307, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act by an order dated 28.9.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 31714 of 2010, on the submission that he was ready to pay the arrears of maintenance to his wife as directed by the Family Court. Since he did not do so, he was not released on bail and has renewed his prayer on the ground that he has filed a Revision against the order of Family Court. Taking into consideration, the fact that there is material to show the direct complicity of the petitioner in torturing his wife for ends of dowry, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)