IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38152 of 2011 Ramdeo Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 29.11.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Earlier, petitioner was granted provisional bail vide order dated 30.11.1999 passed in Cr. Misc. no.29162/1999 for a period of four weeks from the date of his release but the petitioner misused the aforesaid privilege and absconded as a result of which processes were issued against him and he could be remanded in this case on 18.5.2011.It is a serious case of murder and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he opened fire on the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that up till now, three prosecution witnesses have been examined and seven prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined and it is also contended out by him that having more or less similar allegation co-accused Karu Yadav has already been granted privilege of bail vide order dated 31.1.2000 passed in Cr. Misc. no.31091/1999 but I am not at all convinced with the above stated contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Sessions Trial no. 459/2011 arising out of Asthawan (Bind) P.S. Case no. 218/1998 is, hereby, rejected. - 2 - However, the learned trial court should expedite the trial of the petitioner as early as possible. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)