IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17926 of 2010 BHULAN KHAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel Sri Ram Kishun Prasad, on behalf of the petitioners no.1. Bhulan Khan 2.Aftab Khan @ Chhote Khan 3. Razaque Mian and 4. Murtuza Khan and the learned A.P.P. for the State. According to the prosecution case the informant Abdullah Khan lodged the F.I.R. alleging therein that on 26.6.2009 the co- accused Aurangzeb Khan along with these petitioners stopped the tractor of the informant and Aurangzeb Khan set fire to the tractor. It is further alleged that the said Aurangzeb Khan wants to grab the land of the informant on the strength of muscle. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is land dispute between the parties and partition suit is going on between them. The learned counsel further submitted that after investigation the Deputy Superintendent of Police and the Superintendent of Police have not found the allegation under section 436 of the I.P.C.to be true. He has annexed the supervision note. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that these petitioners were also member of the mob. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case that the main allegation under section 436 of the I.P.C. is against the co-accused, Aurangzeb Khan, I direct the aforesaid four petitioners 2 to surrender before the court below within one month from today and on their surrendering they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran, in Ram Nagar P.S. Case No.152/09 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AnilKr.Sinha ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J. )