';r\, 1 1'1 1. I- v&'rt^ IN THE COURT OF AT C.( w rB<iiii.»-'ii r i'iS-i2. [Petition under articte 226/227 of the Constitution of India) y PETITIONER ^ls^^ ..'^ /^y. .^%^-/ >f^K ^-^f' . ^.^// <?<• .^ >" ^ -> ^ y aged about. 54 years, S/'o Daddi, afc present. woilang as a Haufa'^s Khalasi ia the office of B-Seatn Hasdeo Aj-ea, Soiifh Eastern Cos Lumted, Distt- Koriva, C-G. elds 'TC? L&U5 1) Ws Sowh Eastem Coalfields Lumted Tltrongh tlie Cliauniai cwo. Managmg C'irector, Soutli E-astem Coalfields Liimted, Seepsuli Road Bil3spur,(C-G.) 2) Deputv Chief Persoimel Maiiaga-, Hasdeo Area, Soutli Easten'i Coalfields Liiiiited, Distt- Koriva, C-G. 3) Supeimtendmg (M) Maaafia, B. Seani CoUien', S-E.C.L- Jhagi'akhand Sub Area, E-istt. Koriva, C-G. PETITION ARTICLE OF TI .CONSTITUTION OF FOR A MANDAMUS, AND DIRECTIONS ETC. 's^ ^w\v\^, ^nl'y'i's, faicii'yy ___—..—^__.-.- -r f ^} ^^ "^. T^ ~^PV?PI, WSKPTS, 'fsR^gy 311^1 q? h-\\ah sn^i ^wN"?ift^ \^.S... .:..\S.l>.'k.. sn^i'^giw ^if?B <ti-l<!<-i41-i WRif ^ fs^t <fa^i< ^aipgqan^i Shri Visluiu Kosta, couns^l for the petitioner. Shri Viaod Dcshinukh, co|unscl takcs noticc on behalf of th( respondents. The peutioner has prefen' 226/227 of ftie Constitution ofpndia beiag aggrieved by ttie order dated 14.02.2004 (Aimexure P^ The petitioner's case is date of birth is recorded as •d this writ peution under Ai-ticle 7) wbereby responclent No.3 had issued the noti.ee to fhe petitiijiricr iafomiing hiTn that hc sheJl stand retire froiu the semces w.i.f. 31.05.2004. that he is working as Hauiage Khalasi in fhe offlce of fhe resp(indetlts' w.e.f. 21.05.1969 aad as per fhe service record & coinpu^Erized pay sUp his date ofbirth is rccorded as 01.07.1945, ia. provjident fund record his date ofbirth is recorded as 01.07.1947 and ab per school trausfer certmcate his 02.01.1950 aud siuce 1987 the petitioner subniitted many repr^sentations for corrections in fhe record but fhe respondents hav^ not carried out any con-ection in. the scrvice rccord. The petition4r has also niade representatiou to the effect tfaat he is prepared tc^ appear before the niedj.cal board for determination of his age but even then respondents have not responded aad contraiy to that pespondent No.3 issued fh.e notice 1_ dated-14.02.2004 (Amiexiire JP-7) whereby he informed the petitioner that he shall stan<| retire froni the semccs w.e.f. 31.05.2004. I have heard leamed coun^el for tlte parties. NN <y' ^g .<fiiiid4, WTRTTO, toray SII^I^! h-n'b an^r ?[^i<^ yi?a OT^?I ^gnsk ^rf?? 1-. wifepfri •(ffi^ •$ 1%^ ^rejTt ^-atpg*? 3n^r eamed counsel for tfae pejtitioner subiuitted fbat as per fhe copy of service book of the petit| birth has bScn.-shoivu as Q1.07J certi&cate (Aniiexure P-2) Iiis ioner in Coluian N0,6 his date of |1945, as per his school tiansfer date of birth is i. 01.02.1950 and m the official recjord oftlie respondents, as per tlie coaiputenzed pay siip (Ai'uiexui-^: P-6) his date of birth has been recorded as 01,07.1945 aad conKrarv to tlie record the respondents are retiring him., Leafned counsel for fhe re^pondents submitted fhat m view of the conflictiag dates of birdi jm. fhe various places, tiie matter raay be referred to the Age Dejtertiunation Coium-ittee to which leamed counsel for tlie petitioner has no objection, Havtng tieard the leamed couascl for fhc partics, havini regard to tlie facts aad circum^tances of the case and haviag regard to tfie dociunents submitt^d by fhe petitioner aiid looking to fbe representations nlade by fhejpetitioner fhe respondents ought to have decided tlie representati^n of the petitioiier aud ought to havc refcrrcd flie inattcr to thc ^ge Deteimination C-oiniaittee but unlbrtiuiately that has not beenjdone, thereKa-e, the respondents are dirccted to refer the mattsr of fhe petitioner to the Age Detemiuiation Conuaittee for d,fetennitiatioii of the age of the petitioner witbin a period of 15 ^lays from. today and ia tura tbe Agc Determiaatiou Coiniiiittee shfill dccide fhe age of the pctitioncr as early as possible after gonig tliTOUgIi ttie relevant seivice record of fhe petitioner as weU as other islocuments submitted by him and if necessarv', the Age Determination Coininittee will be entitled to XI-HC-22 •Svf -^WM^, «'dly*li«,'fadl-My SII^T^H fewsn^i WTWHfttT 'Roshaii/- sn^i'?siiwtifN •^, ;et the petitioner uiedicaUy and fhe decision of fhe Age D final. It is made clear that thd petiuoner trom fhe sewices 082/ 2004 also stands disposed Certified copy as per Rules. •*i's<I<-t'iTii 'wraf4 'feA 'rfspgn ^aipOTsn^i LC for deteruitnation of his age itennination Coianuttee shaU be fespondents wul not retirc the tiU the decision of tlie Age Determination Coiataittee. With tlie afoi-esaid direcpions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, M.W.P. No.l|232/2004& I.A. Nos. 308.1/04 & of. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge