[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.L.NO.1368 OF 2006 Sneha Sawant and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. University of Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Mahendra Bajpai i/b Ashoka Law Firm for Petitioners Mr.R.A.Rodrigues Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.R.J.Singh Advocate for Respondent No.3 ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 28, 2006 DATE : JUNE 28, 2006 DATE : JUNE 28, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Similar issue has arisen in Writ Petition Writ Petition Writ Petition No.3151 of 2005 No.3151 of 2005 No.3151 of 2005 in the case of Ketana Chitnis and Ketana Chitnis and Ketana Chitnis and Ors. Vs. University of Mumbai & Ors Ors. Vs. University of Mumbai & Ors Ors. Vs. University of Mumbai & Ors. which was decided with certain directions and in the said petition Notice of Motion was taken out which was also decided on 21.2.2006. Considering that position, the present writ petition can be disposed of with following directions: i) The Vice Chancellor to appoint Expert Committee in respect of the subject [-2-] matter of the petition; ii) The Committee to submit the report to the Vice Chancellor in terms of time limit fixed by the Vice Chancellor. On the report being submitted to the Vice Chancellor, the Vice Chancellor to take a decision and accordingly, amend the final results if there be any change in the results; iii) We trust that this will be done at the earliest. We further make it clear that we have passed this order on the peculiar facts of this case and this is not to be treated as precedent. . With the above directions, petition stands disposed of. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [-3-]