IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 22422 of 2008 Between: R.Krishnavardhan Reddy S/o.Pulla Reddy R/o.Thumkunta village Ieeza Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector-cum-Programme Co-ordinator EGS,Mahaboobnagar District 2 The Project Director/Addl.Programme ,Co-ordinator (EGS) DWMA,Mahaboobnagar 3 The Mandal Parishat Development officer, Aiza Mandal Mahaboobagar District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent removing the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, against to the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the post of Field Assistant of Thumkunta village, Ieeza Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PRABHAKAR BOMMAGANI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 22422 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in removing the petitioner from the post of Field Assistant without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India; consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the post of Field Assistant of Pulikar Village, Ieeza Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Admittedly, no written orders were passed removing the petitioner from service nor any charge sheet was issued or any enquiry was conducted as required under the law. Therefore, the oral removal order is arbitrary and illegal and liable to be set aside. It is accordingly set aside. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 14-11-2008. MVB.