HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 4th May, 2006 Bail Application No. 210 of 2006 Order on the bail application of the accused CRIMINAL SIDE Veer Singh S/o Shri Atar Singh R/o Village – Bahadurpur Jat Police Station – Pathri District – Haridwar ….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ….. Opposite Party _____________________________________________________________ In Case Crime No. 76 of 2005 U/s 304-B I.P.C. & ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act Police Station – Pathri District - Haridwar _____________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Rajendra Singh-learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The accused-applicant is the husband of the deceased. The report was lodged by Sanjay Kumar u/s 304-B I.P.C. & ¾ D.P. Act. Later on the trial started. PW1-Sanjay Kumar-complainant is the brother of the deceased, PW2-Kantu is the Grand father of the deceased, PW3-Smt. Savitri is the Nand of the deceased and PW4-Mahavir is the brother-in-law of the deceased. They all have been declared hostile and they have not supported the prosecution version. According to the chargesheet, there are two other independent witnesses namely, Surendra and Som Prakash who had been examined as PW-5 and PW-6 and they have also been declared hostile. It was contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that there is no evidence in this case. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the accused-applicant, Veer Singh be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned. (J. C. S. Rawat, J.) Dated 04.05.2006 Shiv