1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16813 of 2011 SURIYAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.12 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAMANUR POLICE STATION, CHINNAMANUR POST, THENI DISTRICT.(CR.NO.596 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A12 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 435 and r/w TNPPDL Act Section 3(1), in Crime No.596 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.M.Karuppasamy Pandian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. 4.He would further submit in his argument that the defacto complainant and Ananthan who is employed as Driver in Tamil Nadu police armed force Namakkal District has preferred a complaint against this petitioner and 118 others alleging that while the complainant and his other colleages were in their petrol duty at Chinnamanoor, Theni District, the residents of Chinnamanoor Village and Farmers staged demonstration at different places condemning the Kerala's stand in the Mullai Periya Dam issue at that time https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 some of the demonstrators have pelted stone to the police vehicle which was the driver by the complainant and thereby they damaged the police vehicles window glasses worth about 26,500/-. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the investigation is offing and the plea of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail may not be considered. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five hundred only) before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. The said amount shall not be released without the order of this Court. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAMANUR POLICE STATION, CHINNAMANUR POST, THENI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.KARUPPASAMY PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.44942 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16813 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 TR : 23.12.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/