Civil Revision No. 2377 of 2010(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2377 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: April 08, 2010 Jogi Ram and others ...... Petitioners Versus Canara Bank ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.R.K.Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order whereby the respondent-plaintiff has been allowed to tender a statement of account. Learned counsel has argued that this document could not have been tendered in evidence in rebuttal as it was evidence of affirmative nature and this objection should have been decided forthwith. Learned trial Court has permitted the tender of the document and held that objections regarding its tendering in rebuttal have been kept open. In the circumstances at this stage it cannot be said that the order suffers from such material irregularity which calls for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Civil Revision No. 2377 of 2010(O&M) Consequently this petition is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE April 08, 2010 sunita