IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH, ATBILASPUR INTHEMATTEROF MISC. APPEAL N0^l OF 2004 fc CHHATTISGARH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ^ • RAIPUR THROUGH THEMANAGING' DIRECTOR, CHHATTISGARH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT GORPORATION GHARI CHOWK, RAIPUR (C.G.) ' . A vs. 1. < JAGMOHAN,S/o. PUNIT LAL, JLAGEDABQUT30YEARS, OCCUPATK3N SERVICE ^2., SANJAY KUMAR, S/o. JAGMOHAN, /" ..^•<AC}EDA8QU!T^iYEARS' , .3 ^ AJAY.P.I&I^ JAGMONAN /^' ^A0EB.A,BQIJT^YEARS. - - .^MJ^^iiW^-^^^sm^,^' • '<^©E©;3sa(lH'C:4/¥EAft&1 , • ::., :1, 5^, iW.LAXKHNiBMD/tt.^GMOHAN^^ /AGEDiAB6UIT 1 SA YEARS, . Sl.No.2to5MINO^THROUGH THEIR FATHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN JAGMOHAN SARTHI, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE NAYA GORCHHA, KASTOL, P/S & TAHSIL KASDOL, DISTTRAIPUR (C.G.) PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE DHUMABHATHA, PQST & P/S BARAMKELA, TAHSIL SARANGARHDISTT. RAIGARH (CG) APPELLANT AGRIEVED PARTY / 6 c, n /^JURAM. S/6. KEJURAM, AGED 'ABOUT 5Q YEARS, CAST TELI, . occupATioN - sERyiee, wo. PERSABHADE8. ROAD, BALAUDA BAZAR, DISTT. RAIPUR (C.G.) ?: G.S.MISHRA, JOINT MANAGINGDIRECTOR, .CHHATTISGARH . • ; ;• INFRASTRUCTUKE - . DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENTSI-5/ APPLICANTS ^ .^e.Ir-; ^Mf <^ .^^/ ^•'^.^ •'.-t>' ^ p'^ <' .y '^'^?;^^'' ,^ ^) CIDC, GHARI CHOWK, RAIPUR (C.G.) PRESENTLY COLLECTOR, DISTRIGT RAJNANDGAON (C.G.) 8, SHAILESHPATHAK, ' ^ / MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHHATTISGARH - INFRASTRUGTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, GHARI CHQWK, RAIPUR(C.G.)PRESENTLY MANAGING DIRECTOR CHHATTISGARH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,DKS MANTRALAYA,RAIPUR(C.G.), 9 STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ^ THROUGHCOLLECTORRAIPUR (C.G) ^ 9-A ySTATE OF M.P., THROUGHTHESECETARYTOTHE GovemmentofIndia.,G)EM.P.DEPT., OBTRANSP0RT,VALLABH .BHAVAN, BH0PAL (?«1.P) .,,: .';:- RESPONDENTS 6-9 NONAPPLICANTS NECESSARY PARTY ^9-B IJNIQN 0F D IA, •..,. , : ( 13IROtJ(jH SEQRETARY TO THE ©OVEKNMENT'OFIKTBIA MTNISTRY OF ROAB TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS,NEW DELHI PROEORMA RESPONDENTS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OE THE MOTOR VEHIGLE ACT 1988 SII^t W R'fi'* 'ini an^?[ sbli^ 'S^EI' "'ll^ld'M, ®TTIy'IS,1<<Cll'Hy,< V-t J^ 10ft ^ °VS'^\ \-l_oek ^...........;..............................^.+....^200 an^ Ma«c(^f^^i) TOnwdtefsii^'i BLE SHRi RAJEEV GUPTA HON'BLE SHR! RANGNATH CtilANDRAKAR. J ^!iti'£)<>< < Shri Pradeep Saksena, lear Shri Vikram Dixit, learned c( Shri S.K. Mishra, learned Pi Ms. Shashi Bareth, learnedl Shri Anand Verma, learne^ No. 9-B. The appellant has unneces 9-A,State of M.P. and 9-B, Unh appeal though they were not partif In this view of the matter hereby dismissed. The appellant is dlrected to of M.P. and 9-B Union of India within two weeks. On the appeliant's failure 9-B from the array of the respon period of tv/o weeks, the appeal reference t6 the Bench. l),oao. c)»Nld4l'^*)i^cfi "^f^^ I ^" SffRTH 3fl^f ,CJ& ined counsel forthe appellant. )unsel for respondents No. 1 to 5. anel Lawyer for respondent No.9. lcounsel for respondent No.9-A. Standing Counsel for respondent jsarily impteaded respondents No. ^n of India as respondents in the ts before the Tribunal. I.A. No.2789/2004 fails and is pelete respondents No. 9-A, State |'om the array of the respondents ^ delete respondents No.9-A and ijjents within the above stipulated tlself shall stand dismissed without % !!!<i> 'a SB^I 'W! i<-< '^STT STI^T sD*li<* Hmwi 8iiit»> 'S^I •^WM^, 9T\\wie, hw'uy. HJ\r^.T!> . c\^.^-^'^._ "Wl 200 311^1 TR^ ('^f^?) TOIIW ^lftff 311^1 . —1- Post the appeat forjinal he^ '*i<if<')<il-< iroaf 'ifft^t ^te5K ^sifiiHsii^r On due consideration, the a^peal is admitted for hearing. Send for the records. ring in due course. Sd/- CiiiefJustice Sd/- R.N.Chandrakar Judge siiuO<r?Nl<T'gCTRBT, <raaspTH —F.s;l47—2/2010—i ,oo;eoo. i8!t