IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14550 of 2011 1. Tej Narayan Singh S/O Late Sheo Prasad Singh R/O Vill.- Rahimapur, Ps..- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Food And Consumer Protction Department Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. Deputy Development Commissionr, Vaishali 3. B.D.O. Bidupur, Vaishali 4. Mukhia, Saidpur Ganesh , P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.- Vaishali 2 14.9.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer under Panchayat Rahimapur, Bindupur in the district of Vaishali, seeks quashing of the order dated 7.7.2011 passed by the Block Development Officer, Bidupur whereby he has been directed to refund a sum of Rs.80,665/- towards the value of 58.88 quintals of undistributed rice. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, 2 KHAN with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioner, if he wants to deposit the value of rice or rice itself in excess of 20%. (S.P.Singh,J)