t IN Tffi._HIGH CCUBT QF C iATB:SGffiH_AT BILASFUR, mn PETITION N0. 24C.O OF 2002. PETITIONER ^. 7/-'/^i^-^ ^.•ff\!K'~'' /" ^'->^'''i{'^!'*' _ •^ ''...i"'/i^&t-?' .^•-^•fl.*^ ^^^l .N~ VE R SU S eralal Ghandra, S/o Shri Setram Chaadra, Aged about 41 years, Occupation-Agriculture, Incharge Sarpanch, Gram panchayat, Ulkhar, Tahsil Saranggarh, District. Raigarh, (c.G.). <"' RESPONDENTS ,^ '"••';=> ^>1 ^ ^' •1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through ; Tbe Secre-s.ary, panchsya-fc & Rural Depar-taent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Additional Coinmissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, (C.G.). The Collector, DistrictRsigaih, Raigarh, (C.G.). 4. The Sub Divisional officer, Saranggarh, District Raigaxh, (C.G.;. ^' /2/ 5. Nilamber Prasad Chandra, Secretary, (panchayat KSrmi), Gram Psnchayat, Ulkhar, Tahsii Saranggarh, Dis-fcrict p.aigarh, (C.G.). 6. Ramnath, S/o Shri Harihar Chandra, Aged about 26 years, Occupation-Agriculture, Panch Ward No.3, Gcam panchayat, Ulkhar, Tahsil Saranggarh, District Raigarh, (C.G.). 7. Dhanbai ITI/O S'nri Resham Satnami, Aged about 32 years, Occupation-Agriculture, panch Ward No.5, Gt-am panchayat, Ulkhar, Tahsil Saranggarb, District Raigarh, (C.G.). Ramsft'aroop, S/o Shri Heeralal chandra, Aged about 41 years, Occapation—ftgrxculture, panch Viard No.14, Gram Panchayat, Ulkhar, Tahsil Saranggarh, Distcict Raigarh, (C.G.). WRULPcTmON UNDER /fiTICLE 226/227 OF THE _a3NSTITUTl01i OF JNDIA FQR ISSUb OF APPROPRIATE IB.IT IN TKE NAT.URE O^MANDABUS/GEKTIOR^l ETC. OR DIKECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NAiURE ETC. '^^^^p^^H^^^^ XI-HC-22 ^TOI^F fs;IW3Il^T I^^^^^SM IIIEt^^.^lJi^ 75[ -^WM^, ^W'IS, I^VW^. i'AJ^ />/o .^^/6, )2_ CT^ITCTWafta •nai -^f^A^ : A "" •U?A "i^&'U"^'^ slin Kajestl faiictey, couiisi} Shii Raiibir Singh, Govt. A(( Heard. Considenng £heliiaited aud t-7 LU-t fe fhat 110 useful keepuig this writ petttion peudinjj of at &is stage. As the impuj pa.ssed ex-parte, the Court does n pnvate parties. qiTqfera^ tTTOTf'3 fe?t "tfe ^T 'MFaIf 3'Iiisi 1 tor Uie Tieutioiier. lv. for tlie StaT.s. stioii invoi\?ed m this Deti'cioxi. purpose would be ser'/ed ii as f&e saiae cgai fce disposec uj^ned order (Ex3libit P-1) wa? Lot triuiji tt necessarv to noticf Tnis petitiDn is ciiTected afeinst the order dated 11-1 2002 reicct"ig tnc application for The oetitioner is tlie Psrj.chavat, Ulxhar, Taiisil Samal respoiident No.5 ^A7&s its Secreta mterLSi ojxiei^. inciiarge t-ianiaaca, '.-raili Earh Distt. RaigarttlC.G.I and [Paiichavat Karmi". On thi basis of coBiplaiiits received, ibroceediags for reuiovsi \^ere initiated before the Sub D.h'isio^ial Ofllcer, Sa.raagarh. The petitioner {Sarpaii.clii was exoner^ited and the respoiide.at No.5 i :\ was fouad guiliy of lapses. In Isuo-inotto revisioa fhis order *.. ^ r- . ^, VS ^\-^^i Bii:,l ir^ Ilt.il XNiC522 3nS?[:^i. f^lc^^lG^ ^i^-fiqr^l^^ w u.- •--.J\ l;^'3(Nit^[g %;:'R iw;i< »iTH ^ii-ITai5sfJ^...S&M^&t sfl^r'reiiwsfet .—^ was reyersed; l>x tM^eaUeetor, w|lio-^lel4 the petitioiier giulty aiid exonerated the Baachay^ K^rnU a^ thfi orci.er of reinoval undefeSectijon 40^6f Paal This QrdsE^VE^^g^ffileftliefeis:!^ -£alilaspuag;I3i»i§i0ii,|,,wto^^^-e]ected .Qperat:uai^£'fflfe|iigEmgDfid|Q]^er.;^ !of"cliaI.Ienge3a,ythe;p3^sent wrtt'pe^rticm., ose ofthe appeal at aa. earity Coiniilissioner & Additional 'f.'Qie Court would jQrdniaif^ ^ In auch a sitsation i liaye onlered ftie ajifliorrty;tp°dis^i date. However, the posts of Biiej Coituiussioner have been abolishfed but no alteniati.vG fonun lias been created nor fhcre is an^ provision uiider wMch flie: proceediags arisittg uiider the Pa4chayat Raj Adluttiyani, 1993; peiidiog- before fhe CoTnmissioneil ^' •' ' :.'•'••:. ..•/. : "•. ':.. :.„- •::'"• aod again State couiisel wasKasiq which is fhe foruin,: wiucb. wiU tal|s Up the appeals filed before; | ttie CcaninisSibner or are requiret^ te Be- filed fhere. [JThfi Qnly reply given by fhe State cQHilisel'^as'th.attlieStatte is:lp6laiig iato the m.after. It is-thenefore, 'aypaieat that tilt such ;tnne ;as { <*]<<(fl4-< 4W<riI '?:;fe7t-'(l^§R ^sf^Tti^atiN"1 •. -• :hayat Raj Adhioiyam, t993. the .I>rayer ibr s^ying the 3'Bat order is subject matter are to be traiisferred. Tiine :d tb iafenn fhe Court as to at.adB; fa v.ma ".iiisa .-!;M :!.IM3 laa 1' ?|ic|l^Elll,;l?i;||;^: » XI-HC-ZZ 13'^ «traK;i%3';olwK5fe tllWfTW-IB) .E.__..M^.!AS3.l165'/fta "sn^t^i. tci-ii.* 3(t?T ^fl .^li^ J- S5k»^f, ^ 3H^[;'^gfiS?^tf?B -J. ^)<(;ff<S:ift'f: 4t4^ ^ .t^^ <P?f^.r< ^ ari^Ff siitstv propi|r foru.m is proyided Htigant wi!l wifhout .know.m.g'wfiiGh fpruiil to inatter, the .Court tTiinks it qvio in iavpur;)3f tUe petttioner, foruiu is ereated orlconstituted., fhe appeal expeSitioUsIy. ^ Wifh the aforesaid obseifvatiorts petitfoii stands disposed bf • 1509/ 2Q02 & I.A, .N0,7697/3002 disposed o£. i ' Certified edpy as perrules. [Bioviug froin piUaa- to p6st approach. Iit ftus view of the to pass an order of statu.s lAs aud when au altemative .t wiU take up and dispose of and idirsctions the Gonsequeiitly' M.W.P. No. fpr urgent heaiiiLg also staad Sd/- P.C NAIK Judge 'ff'*f''-''t<~^':."'t F^T 111