( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4359 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 628 OF 2009 Nargis Parveen w/o. Shah Nawaj, .. Applicant Age 23 years, Occ. Household, R/o. Madhyam Chandipur, 24, Paragana, Kolkata, West Bengal. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4360 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 629 OF 2009 Mohd. Saifuddin s/o. Nurul Mandal, .. Applicant Age 28 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Motiganj, Near BSF Camp, Bongaon, West Bengal. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Shri N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the applicants. Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for respondent/State. ( 2 ) CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 07.01.2010 P.C. :- 1. These are two applications filed in two appeals by original accused Nos. 3 and 10. Accused No. 10 Nargis was not available when charge sheet was filed in Sessions Case No. 194 of 2007 and therefore accused No.3 Mohammad Saifuddin was tried in Sessions Case No. 194 of 2007. Accused No. 10 Nargis was arrested subsequently and separate charge-sheet which is registered as Sessions Case No. 31 of 2008 was sent against her. Both the Sessions Cases were tried together and disposed of by a common judgment dated 08.12.2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Aurangabad. Present applicants/appellants i.e. accused Nos. 3 and 10 are convicted of offences punishable under sections 489-B, 489-C, 120-B and 420 of the I.P.C. For offences punishable under sections 489-B and 489-C of the I.P.C., each of the accused was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs. 5000/-. No separate punishment was awarded for offences punishable under Sections 120-B and 420 of the I.P.C. ( 3 ) 2. Heard Adv. Shri N.S. Ghanekar for the applicants and A.P.P. Shri K.M. Suryawanshi for the respondent/State. The learned advocate for the applicants argued that fake currency notes were found in possession of accused Nos. 1 and 2, who are not appellants or applicants before this Court. So far as accused Nos. 3 and 10 are concerned, it is case of the prosecution that in their accounts, currency notes were deposited in the bank. However, no evidence of bank official was produced to show that the bank received counterfeit currency notes having been deposited in the account of accused Nos. 3 and 10. He also argued that no counterfeit currency was found in possession of either of accused Nos. 3 and 10. 3. My attention was drawn to para 51, which is an inference drawn of conspiracy from the circumstances. In the circumstances, I am inclined to grant these applications for bail. However, it appears that both the applicants have not given their full addresses, particularly, house numbers, lane or area in which their houses are situated. The learned advocate for the applicants Shri Ghanekar assures that he would produce evidence regarding full, permanent residence of ( 4 ) accused No. 10 Nargis and that of also accused No.3 Mohd. Saifuddin and his occupation to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 4. Considering the nature of the offences proved and the fact that both the appellants/applicants are residing far away and for securing their presence following order is passed:- . Each appellant/applicant be released on bail of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties each of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only), after the appellants/applicants produced evidence regarding permanent residence and business of accused No.3 Mohd. Saifuddin and accused No. 10 Nargis, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 5. The Criminal Applications stands disposed of. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/JAN10/cra4359.09