1 IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 767 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.505 OF 2007 Natha Shankar Linge (Waikar) & Anr. .. Appellants V/s. Narmadabai Nivrutti Waikar & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the Appellants/Applicants. Mr. A.B.Avhad for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : JULY 24TH, 2008. P.C. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant prays for bring the heirs of Respondent No.7 on record. 2. In paragraph 3 of the above Civil Application, the heirs 2 and legal representatives of Respondent No.3 who is also dead are mentioned. For the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause “a”, in so far as the heirs of Respondent No.7 are concerned. In so far as the heirs of the Respondent No.3 are concern, a statement is made in the Civil Application that the heirs of the Respondent No.3 who are mentioned in paragraph No.3 are already on record in their individual capacity. In my view, therefore the office objection in so far as the said Respondent No.3 does not survive. However, the learned Advocate for the Appellants to carry out the amendment in respect of Respondent No.3 and intimate to the other side. 3. The learned Advocate for the Appellant to carry out amendment in the cause title of the Appeal within two weeks from date. 4. The Civil Application is accordingly, disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J.]