IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11294 of 2008(T) ------------------------------------- OS.297/2007 OF MUNSIFF COURT,ATTINGAL ............................................... PETITIONER: ------------------- ZEENATH BEEVI, NANSIYA MANZIL, MADATHAPPACHA P.C.MUKKU P.O., KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. NISA, THASLIMA MANZIL, MADATHAPPACHA P.C. MUKKU P.O., KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. LATHEEF, AMZIYA MANZIL, VANDITHADAM P.C. MUKKU P.O., KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SAJEEM, THASLIMA MANZIL, MADATHAPPACHA P.C. MUKKU P.O., KALLAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. CENTRAL NAZER, MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R.BINDU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== W.P.(C) No.11294 OF 2008 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of April 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred to quash Ext.P6 communication and for an interim relief to direct the respondents to stay further construction in their property. At the outset, it is fundamental that a court can pass an order only with respect to the property which is the subject matter of the suit. In this case a Commissioner has been appointed. He had visited the property and reported about the lie of the property. The court below has directed the parties to maintain status quo regarding the lie of the property. This is clearly projected by the orders issued by the Nazrate in Exts.P4 and P6. If there is some other grievance, it is for the party to move the court where the matter is pending for further directions. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/- CRPs 1918 & 1919/2003 -:2:-