Income Tax Appeal No. 231 of 2010 [1] Date of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decision: 19.7.2010 Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnal .....Appellant Versus M/s Market Committee, Jundla ….Respondent CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mehinder Singh Sullar 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Yogesh Putney, Advocate, for the appellant. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The revenue is in appeal aggrieved against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 8.5.2009, whereby the appeal filed by the Assessee against the order dated 12.1.2009 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, was allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant has fairly pointed out that Question Nos. 1 and 2 have been decided by this Court against the Revenue in ITA No. 535 of 2009 decided on 5.7.2010 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnal v. Market Committee, Pipli), whereas Question Nos. 3 and 4 stand concluded against the Revenue in ITA No. 151 of 2010 decided on 5.7.2010 (The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hisar v. Market Committee, Narwana). Since the issues stand decided by this Court against the Revenue, we do not find that any question of law arises for consideration in the present appeal. Hence, the same is dismissed. [ Hemant Gupta ] Judge [ Mehinder Singh Sullar ] 19-07-2010 Judge Income Tax Appeal No. 231 of 2010 [2] ds