c.^^ ^' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.A. (C) N0. j I OF 2010 APPELLANTS ^- ^^•^y y'^y' :1. Karuna Bai Sahu, W/o Late Gadarai Sahu, aged about 33 years, A 2. Mukesh Kumar, S/o Late Gadarai ^ Sahu, aged about 16 years ({wrongly mentioned as 36 years) Kamlesh Sahu, S/o Late Gadarai Sahu, aged about 14 years, ^-4. Dhaneshwar Sahu, S/o Late Gadarai Sahu, aged about 12 years, 5., Nilesh Kumar, S/o Late Gadarai ^ Sahu, aged about 07 years, 6., Jagdev, S/o Paranu Sahu, aged ^ about85 years, Appellant No. 2 to 5 are minor, through legal guardian mother appellant No. 1, All R/o Kikirda, Police Chowki- Hasaud, Police Station-Jaijaipur, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS :1..- Naresh Kumar Sahu, S/o Tilakram Sahu, aged about 35 years, R/o Kharaud, P.S.-Shivarinarayan, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (Driver, Sumo No. C.G. 16 OB/837) ,,2. Ishwar Prasad, S/o Guharam Patel, R/o Tushma, P.S.-Shivarinarayan, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (Owner, Sumo No. C.G. 16 OB/837) 3- United India Insurance .Company Limited, Divisional Office, Kachahari Chowk, Madina Manjil, Raipur(C.G.) /- (Insurer, Sumo No. C.G. 16 OB/837) CLA1M BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AWARDED AMOUNT VALUATION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL Rs.30,25,000/- Rs.4,05,500/- Rs.1,50,000/- That, the appellarits have reduced the valuation of present appeal in compliance of Section 87 (4) of Chhattisgarh High Courts Rules and Order, as the appellant are only challenging the quantum on the ground of deduction for personal expenses and further nothing has been awarded towards love and affection. -tf- -^-' MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/S. 173 OF JHE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 r: :v -HC—78 3"=T "41'4H<4, ^•d1y;l<», r°«"ll'Mll< ^^^A£cl.^.J.lf..^ Sl^f •q^? (Tpl^S*') Kw Shri Gautam Khetrapal, courisei for the appellants. Shri Dilip Dubey, counseljorj-espondents No.1 & 2. Smt. Chitra Shrivastava, couijisel for respondent No.3. Learned counsel appearing |for respondents No. 1 & 2 submits that one appea! M.A.(C) Np.42/2010 has been fited by respondents No. 1 & 2 arising oi|t of the same accident, is pending consideratlon before the Dii/lsion Bench of this Court. In view of the statement |nade by learned counsel lappearing for respondents No. 1 ^ 2, Shri Khetrapal, learned jcounse! for the appellants seeks j>ermission of this Court to jwlthdraw this appeal with liberty t4 file cross-objection in the Liberty is granted, as prayed f^>r. With the aforesaid liberty, tl^e appealis dlsmissed as /ithdrawn. i The records of Tribunal be <agged along with M.A.(C) ^0.42/2010. -- Sd'- N.K.Agarwa! Judge -k ^ aitn^TWN? j ^giw^tetsn^T <?«n3n^t»Tiw ^N?iiN-qreff-Q fest ^n?R ^sifinsn^i S.B. Hon'bie Shri Justice N.K. A arwal 1 29-03-2010