IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 13TH JANUARY 2011 / 23RD POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1087 of 2011(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- VALLANCHIRA MOHAMMADALI, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O. AHMEDKUTTY @ KUNHANHAJI, RESIDING AT VALLANCHIRA HOUSE, KARUVAMBRAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 123. BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SMT.RESMI NANDANAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. CENTRAL JUMA MASJID, MANJERI, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND MUTHAVALLY, PANDIKKAD ROAD, MANJERI-676 121. 2. HASSAN MOIDEEN KURIKKAL, PRESIDENT AND MUTHAVALLY, CENTRAL JUMA MASJID, PANDIKKAD ROAD, MANJERI-676 121. 3. AUNJIPPURAM KUNHAN, S/O. ALAVI HAJI, SECRETARY, CENTRAL JUMA MASJID, PANDIKKAD ROAD, MANJERI-676 121. 4. THE KERALA WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KERALA WAKF BOARD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 017. R4 BY ADV.SRI.A.A. ABUL HASSAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 1087 of 2011 I ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 13th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in the writ petition is that the fourth respondent, before whom Ext.P1 application has been filed by the petitioner, should be directed to expeditiously complete the proceedings. 2. Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent, who has obtained instructions, submits that on Ext.P1, notice was issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Board and that from 21-04-2010 onwards, so far, there were ten postings. It is stated that during the said period, the documents were ordered to be produced, local inspection was ordered and copy of the audit report from the Chartered Accountant was called for. It is stated that now the case is adjourned and posted to 24-01-2011 for the reason that service of notice is not complete. 3. From the submissions thus made by the Standing W.P.(C) No.1087/2011 : 2 : Counsel, it is evident that the Chief Executive Officer, who has dealt with Ext.P1 exercising his powers under Section 25 of the Wakf Act, has taken expeditious action and that the allegation that there was delay on his part in dealing with the petition is incorrect. 4. In such circumstances, it is not necessary that this Court should issue any further directions in the matter. Be that as it may, it is directed that the Chief Executive Officer shall expedite the proceedings in Ext.P1 and conclude the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge