CWP No.11495 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CWP No.11495 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2010 Surinder Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate for the petitioners. ... Alok Singh, J. In this petition very interesting question is involved as to whether petitioner allegedly inducted as substitute member in gross violation of the order dated 5.10.2001, 18.12.2003 and 6.1.2004, issued from time to time, is entitled for the allotment as member of the Cooperative Society ? Undisputedly vide letter dated 5.10.2001, Registrar, Cooperative Society, UT, Chandigarh, directed the Society that fresh allotment may be undertaken as per the bye-laws of the Society and case for CWP No.11495 of 2010 2 substitution be sent to it for clearance. Undisputedly, thereafter vide letters dated 18.12.2003 and 6.1.2004, the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, directed the society not to substitute the members till substitution policy is framed and further directing that on the failure to comply with the directions, the entire responsibility will lie with the Managing Committee of the respective society. In this petition, petitioner claims to have been the substituted member in the Society and demanded allotment as member. In an identical matter i.e. Sudhir Mahajan Vs. U.T., Chandigarh and others (CWP No.17874 of 2009, decided on 14.7.2010), this Court has taken the view that induction of the petitioner as substituted member is in gross violation of the orders dated 18.12.2003 and 6.1.2004 issued by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies and list of the newly inducted members was never sent for clearance to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies and hence, petitioner is not entitled for any allotment. The issue raised in the present petition is covered by the judgement of this Court in the matter of Sudhir Mahajan (supra). In view of the above, present petition has no merit and hence is dismissed. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 29.07.2010 sk.