IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 12.10.2010 COCP No.1980 of 2010 (O&M) Surinder Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Surina Rajan, IAS and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. R.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that the order of withdrawing one increment was quashed by this Court on 23.05.2006 on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice, but again the pay of the petitioner has been fixed by not granting the said benefit. It is contended that the pay of the petitioner should have been fixed in the revised grade i.e. ` 9300/-, but it has been taken as ` 9100/- and consequently, the benefit of one increment has not been granted to the petitioner, which was quashed by this Court. Though it is asserted by the petitioner that his pay is ` 9300/-, but there is no document to show such pay was being drawn by the petitioner on 01.01.2006. Such disputed question of fact cannot be gone into a contempt petition, when the order was only to quash the order dated 28.05.2005 with direction to the respondents to pass orders, if any, in accordance with law. In view of the above, I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Consequently, the present petition is C.R.No.1980 of 2010 (O&M) dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to establish his right in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. 12.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2