IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 42 + TR.P.(C.) 26/2010 ANITA MEHRA Petitioner Througli: Ms. Jayshree Satpute, Advocate versus SATISH MEHRA Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Mr. Rajeev Agaiwal, Advocate 0 CORAM; JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 28.04.2010 Caveat No. 123 of 2010 Since learned counsel appeared for the Respondent/Caveator, no further order is called for. The caveat is , disposed of. TR.P (O No. 26/2010 & CM APPL No. 7789/2010 ^ 1. The Respondent in HMA No. 527 of 2005 pending in the Court of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi ('ADJ') seeks transfer of the said case to a Court of competent jurisdiction at Patiala House Court, New Delhi. 2. The reason adduced by the Petitioner for seeking transfer is that the. learned ADJ has shown biased attitude towards the Petitioner and has made certain remarks about the Petitioner which are alleged to be unfair. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has drawn attention to the remarks as set out in para 12 of the petition. 3. In the considered view of this Court, there are no grounds made out for TR.P. (C) No. 26/2010 Page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified inferring any real bias or likelihood of bias on the part of learned ADJ before whom the aforementioned petition is pending. 4. A grievance is then made that ori 19^^.November 2008 costs of Rs.7,000/- were imposed on the Petitioner for non-appearance of her counsel on that date. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, it will be open to her to seek appropriate remedies that may be available to her in accordance with law. It, however, still does not provide sufficient justification to seek a transfer. 5. In the considered view of this Court, there is no ground made out for transfening the petition in question as prayed for. 6. The petition and the pending application are dismissed. APRIL 28, 2010 rk S.MURALIDHAR, J TR.P. (C) No. 26/2010 Page 2 of 2