(1) WP. 6424.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6424 OF 2010 Pramod S/o. Raghunath Dongre .. PETITIONER VERSUS The Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon through it's Commissioner .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.Y. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 20TH JULY, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. The petitioner challenges the judgment and order rendered by the learned Member of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon in proceedings of ULP (complaint) no. 62 of 2005. The complaint filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed. According to the petitioner, his father was working as sweeper on the establishment of the respondent and died in furnace on 8.10.1986. Thereafter his mother was employed as a sweeper but she also died due to accident. According to the petitioner, he was minor (2) WP. 6424.2010 at the relevant time and ought to have been employed on compassionate ground in the vacancy created due to death of his parents. His various representations were not heeded to by the respondent and as such he filed the complaint application. The Industrial Court found that the petitioner failed to produce any record to show that his parents were employed as sweepers on the establishment of the respondent. The Industrial Court further noticed that there was absolutely no record produced to show that the parents of the petitioner died in furnace and he was eligible to claim compassionate appointment after attaining majority. The record further reveals that the petitioner was employed as a sweeper in HUDCO (Housing Development Corporation) for a period between 2000-2005. It is explicit, therefore, that his claim for compassionate appointment was belated and not duly proved. There is nothing perverse in the findings of the Industrial Court. Petition dismissed. No costs. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp