1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5716/2010 Dalvir Khatik & Ors. vs. Chief Medical and Health Officer & Chief Executive Officer & Ors. Date of order : 23/4/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri P.S. Sharma for the petitioner. ****** Shri P.S. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that even though the contractual appointment of the petitioners was to last till 31.10.2010 or till the end of the project, even if it is assumed that the project is not available, then also the petitioners were required to have been continued upto 31.10.2010. There services could not be brought to an end without recourse to clause-7 of the agreement dated 31.10.09, according to which the respondents were required to serve on the petitioners notice of one month or pay to them one month's package / contract amount in lieu of notice. The respondents abruptly by order dated 1.4.2010 terminated their service without complying with clause- 2 7 of the agreement. Moreover, the scheme has still not been discontinued. It is contended that in the order dated 1.4.2010, reference was made to the Mukhya Mantri Rahat Kosh, which is only a misnomer. In fact, the broader scheme of the Government of India is N.R.H.M. under which Pharmacists and Computer Operators are appointed. Services of the petitioners cannot be abruptly terminated by replacing them with another set of ad hoc employees. Having regard to the facts aforesaid, I deem it appropriate to require the petitioners to submit a representation to the Chief Medical and Health Officer and Chief Executive Officer, District Health Committee, District Ajmer, who shall examine the grievance of the petitioners and if it is found that petitioners have been replaced by subsequently appointed contractually employee, consider the advisability of reinstating them in service or otherwise ensure compliance of clause-7 of the agreement. The said representation shall be 3 disposed of within a period of six weeks from the date of its making. The writ petition is disposed of. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/