IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 186 OF 2008 STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus M/S. C.M.A. CONSTRUCTIONS THROUGH PARTNERS ... Respondent Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudha Pai Kir, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 16th December, 2008 P.C. Heard Mr. Rivonkar,learned Government Counsel for the petitioners. Having heard the learned Government Counsel, I find that the petitioners have not made out any case for interference with the impugned order. The Trial Court has rightly held that since the amount is payable in terms of the decree passed by the Court, the petitioners were not entitled to deduct T.D.S. from the amount due to the respondents. I find that the Trial Court has neither committed any illegality nor jurisdictional error while passing the impugned order. Hence, the petition is summarily rejected. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA