Patna High Court MJC No.3158 of 2011 (3) dt.04-07-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3158 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Suman Kumar Ramjee Das Vill-Aadabari, P.S-Choutham, District- Khagaria .... .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mr. Anjani Kumar, The Prinicipal Secretary 3. Mr. Kalka Sahni, The District Magistrate, Khagaria 4. Mr. Yogendra Paswan The Member ,District Teacher Employment Appelate Tribunal Khagaria 5. Mr. Suryadeo Paswan, The D.S.E Khagaria 6. Mr. Fahim Akhtar, The B.D.O Choutham District-Khagaria 7. Mr. Shambhu Nath Keshri The B.E.O Choutham District-Khagaria 8. Mr. Mani Kumar Chaurasia, The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Rohiyar, Block And P.S- Choutham, District-Khagaria 9. Smt. Renu Devi, The Mukhiya-Cum-Chairman Selection Committee, Gram Panchayat Rohiyar Block And P.S Choutham District-Khagaria 10. Ugresh Paswan Late Nageshwar Paswan Vill- Nauranga, P.O- Keshav Nagar,P.S- Choutham, District-Khagaria .... .... Opposite parties. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shail Kumari SC15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. T. MEENA KUMARI ORAL ORDER 3 04-07-2012 The present contempt application has been filed for violation of the order dated 06.04.2011 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.6138 of 2011. It appears that this contempt application has already been dismissed as against Opposite parties Nos. 8, 9 and 10 on 11.04.2012 for non compliance of the peremptory order passed by this Court on 24.08.2011. The above order has become final. However, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf Patna High Court MJC No.3158 of 2011 (3) dt.04-07-2012 of opposite party No. 7 stating therein that services of the petitioner has already been terminated on 12.03.2011 before passing of the interim order by this Court, i.e. on 06.04.2011, and in his place opposite party No.10, Ugresh Paswan Son of Late Nageshwar Paswan has been appointed vide Letter No.02 dated 24.03.2011 issued by the Panchanyat Secretary and therefore there is no violation of the order passed by this Court. Having heard counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner can as well agitate the matter relating to his termination of service before the appropriate forum. Accordingly, liberty is granted to him to question his termination before the appropriate forum, if so desires, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law. With the above observation this contempt application is disposed of. Namita/- (T. Meena Kumari, J)