1 FARAD CONSTITUTION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4272/2009 (Abhishek Trading Co. ..vs.. Manohar J. Ghenge) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM:- B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE:- DECEMBER 03, 2009 Heard learned Advocate Shri Anil S. Mardikar with Advocate Shri Mohgaonkar for the petitioner- defendant and learned Advocate Shri G.K.Sarda for respondent-plaintiff. After closure of evidence of respondent-plaintiff an application Under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure was moved by the petitioner pointing out that in view of the provisions of Section 57(3) of the Agriculture Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, the Civil Court had no jurisdiction. The court below has found that as trial had already commenced such amendment could not have been allowed. I do not find any perversity or jurisdictional error. No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE 2 Diwale.