IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10185 of 2009 SANTAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is the prime accused who has been alleged to have shot dead the son of the informant, that is the assertion and allegation in the F.I.R. After investigation chargesheet has been submitted, cognizance has been taken and the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions (FTC No. III) reflects that there is material that this petitioner had fired at the deceased. This is the kind of allegation and evidence against the petitioner. In view of above this Court is not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)