IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 32569 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- L.PREETHA, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (MATHS-TAMIL MEDIUM), GOVT.HIGH SCHOOL, VAGAMON, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN SMT.C.N.NOORUL HIDAYA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 5. T.S.ANITHA LETHAMOL, GOVT.MODEL BHSS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.32569 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 30th November,2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is presently working as High School Assistant (Maths-Tamil Medium) in the Government High School, Vagamon in Idukki District. Petitioner had been seeking an an inter-district transfer to Trivandrum District in any existing vacancies The main complaint raised by the writ petitioner is that Ext.P3 in the writ petition was not forwarded to the Director of Public Instruction by the 4th respondent and therefore overlooking his plea, the 5th respondent was given a transfer. 2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the last year's priority list was published on 27.2.2009 by the 4th respondent and from the said list, the 5th respondent was given a transfer. It is assured that the claim of the petitioner will be considered this year and appropriate orders will be passed along with other claimants. It is also submitted that the officially list will be published in February 2010. W.P ( C) No.32569 of 2009 2 The above submission is recorded. The 2nd respondent is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner, in accordance with the guidelines while finalising the list. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. T.R RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE ma W.P ( C) No.32569 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.32569 of 2009 4