IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19855 of 2010 RAM CHANDRA PANDEY & ORS . Versus RAMADHAR BHAGAT & ORS . ----------- 03. 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners who are defendant in the Suit are aggrieved by the order dated 26.8.2009 passed in Title Suit No. 155 of 2002 by the Munsif, Sadar Motihari, rejecting the prayer for amendment of the written statement. The impugned order recites that by the amendment, the admissions made in the written statement was sought to be retracted. To that extent, the Court finds no merit in this application warranting any interference with the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioners however submits that for the aforesaid reason the entire amendment petition including on trivial aspects with regard to typographical mistakes has also been rejected. If that be so, on an application filed by the petitioners nothing shall preclude the trial court from considering that limited aspect of the matter. The application stands disposed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)