^ili m IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH_AT BILASPUR w. P. fs) No. ^-&-s% OF aa^" ^o\o PETITIONER: ..**\e^ ••'•' G^ x ..•^A"^ ..•••-^^- ,^>' R.K.Chandra, S/oShri Shatruhan Chandra, aged about 49 years, /Presentaly posted as Rural Agriculture Extension Officer [ R.A.E.O.],Mock Nagri, in tHe office 6f the Seriior Rural Agnenlture ; Extension Officer DBamtari, Dist. Dhamtari, (C.G.) Versus : I State of Chhaftisgarh, Through The Secretaiy, • Agriculfure Department, D.K.S. Bhawan,. RaipurfC.G.) ; 2. /.The Deputy SeGretaTy; Agriculture Department, D.K..S. Bhawan, ' Raipur(C.G.). • '' 1//-..::::^.:1:.:.''::—:" !. :'l 3..':TheDireGtor, . 1 . :'1 DirectQrate pfAgrieulture Raipur, Krishak Nagar Labhandi, RaipUT,((2.©.^:;:. ^.,:'.": •:: ' ^^ ^ 4. : Thfe Gcanpos.ite.ISirector^' • • 1..'; ^ ,• ttlli^ a:a !il,s:i^illllll wswss 'i Wi OiEce ofComposite Director Agriculture, Raipur [C.O.] 5. The Depyty Directoi-, Office ofthe Deputy Direetor Agriculture Dhamtari, Dist. , Dhamtari, (G.G.) r!, ^ ; v y : . : ••;: •:":':.: -.1,,.,'^"/ • 6. The Sub-Qivisiorfal Agrieyltu.ret OfB.cer EiMamtan, - Office ofitfae Sub-Diyisibnal Agriculture Officei- Dharatari, Dist.Dhamtari,(e.G.) !' . ' . •/ . . . ' ' • . WRITPETITIONU/A 2260FTHEGONSTITUTIONOF INDIAFOR ISSUANCElOjFWRH* IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORAm .PROHABITAIOK^etc. AND / OR FORORDERAND70RDIECTION / DIREeTlQNSIN NATURE^OFWRIT. -HC—78 ^m^ff^Hrai 3^ •*!1<^ICI<1, ®Tllyi(o,fqdl+iy ..|AS).f>©...^....as^8jh. ^' 3(1^1'q?Hr (•jqt^ai^q) 3n^v w R'ii°h "cWT 3T1^?TsFRW /; + n< cc aii winn^fetai^i SB : Hon'uie Shri Maninura Mohan Q7-07-2010 Shri vijay K. Deshrnukh, couns^ He-ard on admission. By this petition, petitioner has d 9/06/2009 and transfer order datedl 28/OS/2010. Submission of iearned cd petitioner 'vvas transfeiTed aimost on^ order, he is being reiieved to be proc^ dated 23/06/2009. K is aiso submitted |1 for the petitioner. ^ssaiied leyaiity ^nel valsdiiy' of order u'ateu 29/06/2009 anu reuevlng order dated lunse! for the petition6r is thal thouyh the year before, now under the Empugri^ procqeaea Government's transier puucy as the Raipur. ft is furlher subrniued that E Learned counsel for the peutlorser fi directed to consider ths case of the pet After hearing the pleadings oftl' rnsTeriSi aiieymg rnaia?!ue againsi any' petitioner is iiTipieaded In hls pefsonal TransTer poiiG'y couici noi ue a ^rouna ioj of the Istesl judyrnent of the Supreme others v. Stafe of 'u.P. and others, 2i i, therefore do not find any grounj jwever, it woulu be open forthe petitione|' tncerned authority and this order shali n^ i'y' rnade by the petitioner against the ord^r in the result, the petition stands disi^issed <ft!<<ltn<flT1 ^il+IClt*'^ fs^ <f^f^K ^Taffinsn^i snr'jvastava, >*. that the said trsnsfer order is violytlon of jetitioner has been sent from NaQari to rther submits that res iior;er on ine aToresaiCi yrouno. fuy'y Dy e petitloner, 1 do not flnd that there Is any ^pecifle offjcer or transfer suthontv nor the Isapacity. The other yroun^ of vioiatlon of inteuefe wilh the ufder oftrariSier lii viyw ^yuo.{15iSupreme emirfeasiss'.'tTS. ^ to Interfere wlth the transfer order. r io represer!? nis ynevance betore ine it come In the way of repfesentatiori If Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava - Judge Hi