Criminal Misc.-M No. 21592 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 21592 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.9.2011 Rajinder Singh @ Sonu .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 203 dated 4.12.2010, registered under Sections 326/323/324/341/148/149 IPC, Police Station, City Kapurthala. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even in the supplementary statement got recorded by the complainant 27 days after his first statement, the injuries, which have been attributed to the petitioner, will fall under Section 324 IPC. The grievous injuries have been attributed to Kulwinder Singh @ Hikka and Harjinder Singh @ Bhodda. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that only two injuries have been attributed to the petitioner, which fall within the domain of Section 324 IPC. The grievous injuries have been attributed to Kulwinder Singh @ Hikka and Harjinder Singh @ Bhodda, who are already in custody in some other case and their production warrants have been sought. Ballu was not arrested. However, in an enquiry by Superintendent of Police (Traffic), Kapurthala, he was found innocent. It was further submitted that the complainant in the present case is himself involved in number of cases. He was also declared proclaimed offender and was taken into custody on 9.8.2011. Criminal Misc.-M No. 21592 of 2011 [2] After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the injuries attributed to the petitioner, in my opinion, he is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. He is directed to appear before Investigating Officer on 22.9.2011 at 10.00 AM for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 13.9.2011 mk