IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14458 of 2009 NAVIN KUMAR @ NAVIN KUMAR SAURAV, son of Madheswar Rai @ Madan Rai, resident of village-Dedhpura, P.S.-Mahnar, Vaishali-----------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 31.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was in love which resulted into their marriage before the Marriage Registrar. Later, a petition was filed on behalf of both the parties for mutual divorce but dismissed and now finally similar petition is filed for divorce. Both the parties are residing separately and accepted for mutual divorce. Now their earlier relation of marriage has been made ground for accusation under different sections of the Indian Penal Code but petitioner’s arrest cannot be justified for any of them. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Brahmapura P.S. case no.42 of 2008 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )