IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46440 of 2008 BHORIK YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 5/ 27.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that parties are relations and the petitioner’s father has already been allowed regular bail by a Bench of this Court but now, the case is compromised. That can never be justified the petitioner’s arrest. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Barh (Athamalgola) P.S. Case No.253 of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. III, Barh in Sessions Trial No. 571 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)