wi c ;?\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURBAT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) w.P.NO?^~^i002 ^ \L PETITIONER Shyamlal Pandey aged 59 years, S/o Late Rain Kumar Pandey, Asstt.Professor, Govt.College, Kurud, Distt.Dhaintari and R/o Masonet 18, Sector-1, Shantinagar, Ralpur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .c..'^: ^^yr^ ..^^•5 -^^s^<^ y : l.The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretaiy, Department of Higher ^A Education, Mantralaya, ^** D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G) 2. The State ofMadhya Pradesh Through Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Manti'alaya, VaUabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. Commissloner, Higher Education Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Science College Compound, Raipur (Chhattlsgarh) 4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, D.K.S.Bhawan, Ralpur (Chattisgarh) 5. Principal, Govemment College, Kumd, Dist.Dhamtari (C.G.) ^c^ '^^.. {cy^o^°\l '^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARJ. MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTBDER SmTABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: 6. State AdministraUve Tribunal of Madhya Pradesh & Chhattisgarh, Through its Registi-ar, R.D.A. BuUding, Ralpur (Chl^attisgarh) XI-HC-22 ^sr '^qFrT^rq, ^Tft-y4i<o, ^<ni^li< aiT^r x^^ W^P^No,515/2002 •^ 200 (^ WH^TT^Hl^ •^^s' ^n^i^Fr 'f^N'^^T ^-^ ^rft'd ^. 3:n^T ^<iT^R 1ETf^T Addittonal Ot»04»2002 Shri Ashisb Shrivasta+'a petitioner, Dr« N»K»Shukla, wlth Shri Sanjay K.Agrawal, the State, Heard* The petitipner ShyamUl applicatioa bearing No» 13/2^ grant of interim rellef date of birth made by the AdminJLstrative Tribunal, The petition has beea the prayer for interim reli4 this petition has been filed interim relief^ Qhi<<I<n<ilri W^t ^ ^S <rsi^i< "^^1^R3T^T » learned counsel for tbe Advocate»Gen®ral along Deputy Advocate General for Pandey has filed origioal ^02 along with application for regardiog ^»nge o£ his r^spondeats» before the Staf sep^rately admitted by the Trlbunal but 'f has been rejected* Therefore, before this Court for grant of Since no other judge 4s available, now the aatter has been placed before tbl.s Comft acoording to the rules of the High Court,. So far as interim rell}ef is coacerned, the decision pf Division Bench of M.P^Hislh Court reported in 1999 12<1) M• P«J »R * 596 • S »PoSharma VsJ to be taken in fehis regard. State of M«P, & 4 others has [Tft^itfe^ • • A^ O ,.,-^..;-."^.-;,^..,^. r XI-HC-22 ^a? '^TRT^PT, 'S^PTS, M<ni^li< 3T^T TT^? W»P<,NO,515/20@2 •^ 200 WRc^TT^HT^ "^•^a" ^TI^T^FT f^IT^'STf^T %^i<=b ^rf^n Anjaai/^ .^? y ^ ^T^T ^TT^T ^T^T w2^» Majunidar reported in (1995) ^l^?<v1<fl<1 'HR^ff ^ fe^st <P*l<^« ^3R^TH STI^T In Burn Standard C<»npe(ny Linited Vs* Diaabandhu 4 S<C»C» 172, it was held by the Apex Gourt that "ultima^ely his claim for correction of birth date is f©und tp bej accseptable^ the damage can be repaired by granting hin Having thus conaidere^ no aase for grant of €nteriB| seinfice is made out^ Howev^ |all those m^netary benefits^w ,, in tbe opinlon of this Cowrt relief so as to contJlnue in r» ultimately if his claim for GorrectJlon o£ date @f b4rth is foiixid to be aeGeptable^ the damage can be repaired l| monetary benefits which he ^ tJLnued in servioe and accor^ In vlew of the above cj >y granting him all those rould have received had he con» liagly it is directed, cder» so far as this petitioa is concerned, is disposed o4 and it is direeted that Tribunal shall ^©id® the ease as eaifly as posslble pceferably within 4 mpnths from the date of p4odueti,onof eertified copy of ttois oie-der, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fe^ ^*T