IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3271 of 2006 RAJMANI KUMARI, wife of Sri Dhyan Pal Singh, and daughter of Late Raghunandan Prasad Singh, resident of mohalla – Purnea court station, P.S. Khazanchi Hatt, District Purnea, presently posted as an Assistant Teacher in Middle School, Purena Court, Purnea, Anchal – Sadar East, District – Purnea. ……………………………… Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar School Exam. Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna through the Chairman. 2. The Chairman, The Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. 3. The Secretary, The Bihar School Examination Board, Sinha Library Road, Patna. ----------- 8 09.02.2009 The petitioner had come to this Court failing to evoke response from the School Examination Board with regard to re- evaluation of her answer-book in respect of educational Psychology when the matter was pending in this Court. The answer book was produced and from the answer book it was apparent that one of the questions was not marked. The matter was then considered by the Board and four marks for the said questions were awarded even on awarding those four marks. The mark sheet was re-tabulated and communicated to the Principal of the petitioner institution and has been annexed to the supplementary counter affidavit filed today. A perusal of the total marks even as re-evaluated does not enure to any benefit of the petitioner as petitioner remains a failed candidate. Sri S.K. Manglam points out that a reference to the answer-book would show that the marks were either given on undue haste mode marking or was extremely strict. In my view, what regulation 20 permeates is recalculation of marks and not physical re-evaluation of answers. - 2 - The writ petition is thus misconceived and is dismissed as such. Kundan (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)