IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 33486 of 2007(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: MUKKAM MUSLIM ORPHANAGE COMMITTEE(REGD.) REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, P.O.MUKKAM, KOZHIKODE DIST. 673602. BY ADV. SMT.S.KARTHIKA SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SRI.M.R.ANISON SRI.T.R.RAJESH RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE, C.S.D.BUILDING, HMT COMPLEX, HMT POST, BANGALORE-31. 3. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, TEHNJIPALAM P.O., CALICUT- 673 635. BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC for UNIVERSITY SRI. I.V PRAMOD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.M. KURIAN, SC for NCTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC , J ========================== W.P.(C). NO. 33486 OF 2007 ========================== Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007. JUDGMENT The writ petitioners submit that by Ext.P1, application has been made to the 2nd respondent for granting recognition to a B.Ed college to be established by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, although Ext.P1 has been made in 2002, the application has not been considered till date. It is in this background the writ petition has been filed. 2. As stated by the writ petitioner Ext.P1 application has been submitted and the same satisfies the requirements. I see no justification for the delay in processing the same. 3. Accordingly, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to process Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioner and pass orders thereon, in accordance with law, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rv