IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5802 of 2009 Decided on : 09.10.2009 Surinder Singh ... Petitioner versus Jeet Ram ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Raman Mohinder, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order dated 18.09.2009, whereby the evidence of the petitioner (defendant in suit) has been closed by the Trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter is now fixed for 23.10.2009 for rebuttal evidence and arguments. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prays for one more opportunity to the petitioner for leading his entire evidence on the said date on his own responsibility before the respondent leads his rebuttal evidence. In my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice, if the petitioner is allowed to lead his entire evidence on his own responsibility on 23.10.2009. If necessary the ld. Trial Court may give another opportunity to the respondent to lead any evidence in rebuttal. It is however, made clear that in case the petitioner CR No.5802 of 2009 -2- does not lead any evidence on that date, no further request in this regard shall be entertained. This revision petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. October 09, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE