IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2009 / 6TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 8969 of 2009(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUHAMMED HANIFA, AGED 47 YEARS S/O.HASSAN RAUWTAR, THOPPIL HOUSE MANNAM PO N.PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV K.S. SRI.RAJIV NAMBISAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, N.PARAVOOR. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALUVA. 3. NASSAR AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.ABDULKHADER SALAMATH MANZIL,PALLATHATTU PARAMBIL MUTTOM, THAIKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DIST. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. R1, 2 & 4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.A. SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 8969 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------- DATED:MARCH 27, 2009. JUDGMENT Raman, J. The allegation made in the writ petition is that on the influence of the 3rd respondent, petitioner was made to go to the police station thrice and is alleged that the police has no power to investigate. There is no merit in the contention of the petitioner. The police is entitled to enquire into the complaint and to find whether there is any case to be taken up. But the question is as to whether it will be harassment or not will have to be decided on facts. The petitioner is being called to the police station. But that is no reason to hold that there is any harassment. 2. The Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the police personnel submits that the dispute was between the relations and except to call them, no case has been registered and, if at all the petitioner's presence is required, they will issue notice under sec.160. The writ petition is closed recording the above. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. mt/-