c^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.V W.P. (0 N0. ^y of 2011 Slngle Bench PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS \^ {MX^ .A^/ ^y y^w\3./' ./•yy ^^'y "^^.. 2. Sanjay Kumar Verma Son of late Shri C.M. Verma, aged about 40 years, R/o. Subhash Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) Rakesh Kumar Verma Son of late Shri C.M. Vermq, aged about 47 years, R/o. Subhash Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Urban Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G.) ^" 2. -The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^; 3. Municipal Corporation, Through Its Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ^" 5. Nazul Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) /' 6. Zone Commissioner, Zone No.4, Sports Complex, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.6.) i'f ^ 1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA n ^ \ ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI1 AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON fC) No. 2530of2011 PETITIONER8 RESPONDENTS SMyay Kumar Verma & Another. 'VERSUS ' , ' ' - State ofChhattisgai-h & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF 11HE CQNSTITimOR QF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Asmhotri, J. .*'. Present: Shri R.Pradhaii, Advocate fbr the pejtitioners. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General fbr the State Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advbcatejwith Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocatefbrtherespondent-MumcipalCor^^ ORDER<ORAL) (Passed ori 10th day ofMay, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr fhe responderrt-Mumcipal Corporation, submits thatthere isno conte^^ disputed stmcture of* the petitioners, jsituated in Ward No. 43, Mother TeresaWard,HouseNo. 32/829, Khasra No. 50^8, Plot No. 77, Area, 2000 sq.ft. Subhash Nagar, Telebaridha, Raipur. Howwer, wheriever it is contemplated or decided to fake ^jiy adionfbrdemolitionofthesmds^ given a proper show cawe notice and after considering the reply of the petitioner, action shall be taken- ifany. 2. In view of the fbregoing, according to leamed counsel for the petitioners, nofhing survwes fbr adjudication in this petition. 3. Accordmgly, the writpetition is disposed of 3-S-} Ainit