IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1305 of 2010(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23645/2010 Dated 30/08/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- DR.C.S.MADHU, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.K.SIVARAJAN, PROFESSOR & HEAD, DEPARTMENT OF RADIOTHERAPY, MEDICAL EDUCATION SERVICES, "DEEPAM" AARPOOKARA EAST P.O., KOTTAYAM-686008. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ MANOJ JOSHI, I.A.S., SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE OF THE RESPONDENT IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ Con.Case.No.1305 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 3 rd day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT As per judgment dated 30 th August, 2010, in Writ Petition No.23645 of 2010, the first respondent therein was directed to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 application dated 9.4.2010 and Ext.P4 representation dated 22.7.2010 submitted by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent did not dispose of the matter as directed in the judgment and thereby willfully and deliberately violated the judgment passed by this court. 2. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the Government passed GO(Rt) No.4269/2010/H & FWD dated 29.10.2010 granting the request for voluntary retirement from service made by the Con.Case.No.1305 OF 2010 2 petitioner with effect from 8.8.2010, as per Rule 56 of Part III KSR. In view of the Government Order, though passed not within the time stipulated in the judgment, I do not think it is necessary to proceed with the Contempt Case. The Contempt Case is accordingly, closed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms