IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.126 OF 2008 Razi Mohammed Shahabuddin & Ors. ..Applicants. (Orig.Appellants) Vs. Smt.Prabhavati Vishnu Rokade ..Respondent. (Orig.Plaintiff) Mr.M.V.Kini i/b.Mr.Suresh Dubey for the Applicants. Mr.S.N.Chandrachud for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 9TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 9TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 9TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The impugned order warrants no interference. The main contention was that the Respondent was likely to take possession of another premises from one Mr.Zaki. On the record as it stands, the Respondent/Plaintiff has not obtained possession as yet. Further, the Court has also found that even if possession of the said premises are obtained it would not defeat the Respondent’s case of bona-fide requirement as the premises are very small premises admeasuring only about 40-50 sq. ft. 2. I do not therefore interfere with the concurrent findings of fact. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant a slightly longer time to the Appellants to vacate the premises. 4. The Appellants are granted time upto 30.4.2009 subject to filing usual undertaking within four weeks from today.