^' f IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUKE AT BILASPUR .^•7^ W.P.No. of 2002 1. LOKMANYA SAHAKARI GRIH NIRMAN SANSTHA MARYADIT, A SOCIETY DULY REGISTERED UNDER THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE M.P. CO-OPERATIVES SOCIETIES ACT, 1960 BEARING REGISTRATION NO.DY. REGISTRAR^PR/95/82-83 DATED 04.12.1982, ROHINIPURAM RAIPUR. 2,^KAMLAKAR KUSREY, SON OF LATE SHRI BALAJI KUSREY AGED 53 YEARS PRESIDENT LOKMANYA SAHAKARI •• rZ'.y", ^^ . ]^'/} .^ LOKMANYA SAHAKARI ^t^oc^*S' GRIH NIRMAN SANSTHA T ^ ^^^/'v MARYADIT, RESIDENT ^^^ "* OF TATYAPARA, RAIPUR. ^A PETITIONERS VERSUS ,,^' OF ^ fl. STATE CHHATTISGARH THROUGH THE ?ECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CO-OPERATIVES, L.$-^ j^j DAU KALYAN SINGH 1^^^ /^J BHAWAN, RAIPUR. ^ 2.THE DE^MY REGISTRAR, CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BESIDE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, G.E. ROAD, RAIPUR. y'lv ^) 3. SHRI J.P. MISHRA, CO- OPERATIVE INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF DY. REGISTRAR (CO- OPERATIVE), RAIPUR. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, RAIPUR. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THEJSSUANCE OF WRIT/ORDER IN THE NATURE OF THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, QUO- WARRANTO PROHIBITION ETC. ETC. XI-HC-22 3TT^T'^T ^Jch 3n§¥T s^^ict» ^i^a ^^^. ^ ^^ ~s-^ ^ww^ ?PT, '^ftWTS, M^ll^y 3TT^?r 'q^?, WW1T ^b^lcb A'1^ 206 •fg^T' ^T^T'^TT^H: "^f^ 06.07.2004 Shri Alok Sur, counsel for Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Gof Shri Maamdra Shrivastavsl, HeaidouI.A. Nos. 1958/0-( writ petition, The petitioner in these ap^: orders which arc under challenl witiidrawn by the State authori^ desirous of prosecutmg fhis matlt Learaed counsel for Interi/ fhe petitioner to wifhdraw the As pcr fhe applications thc{ ia this petition have been thereforc, the petitioner does n<| The petitioner is fhe sole niaste] coinpel him to pursue with caanot be forced to contiiiue and after wifhdrawiag fhe orders) State authorities tiiis petition h^ the petitioner's applicatious (1.4 allowed and fhe petition is disnxis cfr»»<ii<n<ilnHW^S ^ Fs^ <[^^i< '^^f^Fr^i^r [the petitioner, H. Advocate for fhe State. counsel for Intervener. & 4304/04 for withdrawal of the ^Ucations has inentioned fhat the ;e ia fhis writ petition have beeii ?ri4es, tiierefore, tlie petitioner is uot 3r. ^ener has objection ia perrmttiag pe^ition, wiffcdrawn thb with orders wluch arc under chaUcnge by tiie State aufhorities, |»t want to prosecute this matter, of his Htigation aad nobody can inatter, as such the petitioner fhe petition agamst his wishes chaUenged in fhis peti^ion by tlie [s become mfi'iictuous. Thereforc, ^. Nos.4304/04 & 1958/04) arc tsed as wifhdrawn. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tft^ ^Ra^ T<ts