IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2451 of 2010 Shivanand Pandey Versus State of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 3 29.06.2011 From Annexure-J with the show cause it appears that period of absence of the petitioner has been adjusted against his extraordinary leave admissible to him, in terms of Rule 236 of the Bihar Service Code. Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order. In a contempt proceeding, validity of the order cannot be examined. Therefore, this Court is of the view that this matter does not require to be pursued. The application is, therefore, disposed of. Petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)