9% $F CHH§§?§3GARH AT B§L§A$PUR mWSEag‘I 8EN$H £ HCW‘gLE $F§Ri RIRJEEV (EIJPT£a, (3J7, HWWELE $HRE SUNIL KL‘NMR $INHA, J. ; @weai N03§229 oi" 2Km3 ‘ . Makhaniai Gouraha resident 0f E & Shrinivas Gouraha viHage am: post Ghufaku Tamé! Takhatpur D§st§ 8iiasi3ur {3(3) (avmer a? ‘ihe vehECEe) Faguram Sahu aged- about 4S yaarg F¢§§ii€3a§h$ P; F M3 §' son 0f $hri Mohamai Sahu Smt Firtin baé aged abwt 44 years wife of Faguram Sahu Boih residents of vmage Dhor%a, PeSt Pandariya Distt Janjgir — Champa (CG) C%aimanis $adhmm 939% gen 9f'Shri Jamg§iram Paief, resident of viilage Nirtu Distf Bilaspur (CG) {a:¥5eged dsViva) Braiich Manage? Natianal ingumnoe Campany Limiied Ring Read —- 2 Priyadarshini Nagar, BiiaSpur Tahs§i & Dist‘t B§Ea$§ur {(36) (insure?) Mm £3gpg2¢eég mmwF $eckmm $3 a? mam? Vehisies $53!. ‘xn éémaagmiimmg fxw Present S’m‘ Vimie$h BajpaE, cwmei far the appei§ani mgER gzzim mgusg 2w») The f0§§0wing Omar 0f the court waS ‘passed by Figjeev @uptau @J. A \ HEGH €3€3URT §®R§$MZ Mia ilgwiiani iAEmWW". Eit-@ g, _ to Tim maita’ §5 Iisteci iQday far Qi'derS on the agpeiiant’s defam in payment of prooem fee far 5ervice of natise 0f the agpeai 0n the reependente if: ccmpiiame 0f the emer dated 25.06.2009. z. t 2 Sn 25%.21309, me foliewing order was paseed : “Shré Vimieeh Bajpai, éearned counsei 0n behalf ef Shri Viney Dubey, {earned counse} fer the appeiiamé is ”mid on admissien. Admi’i. Ieeue notice of ihe amaeai te the responciente en the aepeiEam’e taking necessary siege wi‘ihin twe weeke M.C.P.i\!0.’ig§?f2f303 aiyeady stands disposed ef vkx‘e em’er e‘eied 18.36.2064.” 3) As the appeHam‘: did n0? take any etepe in compliance Gf the emer deied 25.662309 within the siipmated eeried of twe weeke, matter was tieteti befcre the Additiemai Regéetrar {JuriieiaD err th i?) 15.022009. Ne one aepearee en beheéf 0f the appetlant teefore the rttienei Reeietret (Juéieiet) an 15.G?.2OG§ em ae each the metter ie mew tieteit befere tme 00m far (were en the appetiant‘e 39??gutt. 4) Ae the aepettant has mieerabty taiéed in taking eny steps in eemetience e?” the Order dateii 25.646.20w, thcugh :a eerioct et’ abeLit twe menths have eiaeeed einee then, we are‘iet't with m3 0 ether epiien, bet to diemiee the appeei fer nen~oomp§ianee of the ercter riated 2506.2QQQ “5 t i LV The epeeei, therefore, ie dismissed tar nan-compiiance 0f the order eezee 25%6'2OS9. I Sd/- Chief Justice s i Sd/- S‘Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge [7 y , i .