IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52426 of 2008 MEGHU SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 353,307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 3 / 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s name is not mentioned in the FIR. Subsequently one of the constables, who was present had disclosed that the petitioner was present at the time when the occurrence took place. It is submitted that if the constable had seen the petitioner at the time of occurrence, he would have disclosed his name at the first instance It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 31.7.2008. Considering this aspect, the petitioner (Meghu Sahni) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge FTC No. VI, Purnea in Sessions trial no.1069 of 2008 arising out of Sadar P.S. case no.5 of 2006 with condition that one of the bailers should be family member of the petitioner. shahid (Sheema Ali Khan, J)