1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 392 OF 2006 Popat Mahadev Shinde ........Appellant versus Kashinath Shripat Shinde & ors........ Respondents. Mr. Milind Deshmukh adv. for the Appellant Mr. D.B. Lonkar adv. for the respondents 1 to 5. CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 05th DECEMBER,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Deshmukh learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Lonkar for respondents 1 to 5. 2. The appellant filed regular civil suit no.195/93 for permanent injunction simplicitor against the respondent which came to be dismissed. THe decree of the trial court was challenged by the appellant before lower appellate court unsuccessfully. Hence present second appeal. 3. Both the lower courts after appreciating the evidence on record concurrently recorded the finding of fact that the appellants have failed to prove their possession referable to the title in respect of gat no.219. The appreciation cannot be said to be perverse. No question of law much less substantial question 2 of law is involved. This second appeal is accordingly disposed of. (R. V. More, J.)