•^Sf ^)N|0q, ^Tn'M4t<S, is)01'H^< o^'^wi^ ^^.^.L^)..i3..5.S:.........^ ^^ snityr ^^w (45<^<i^T) 31T^T ?FT f<'li<=h TT^H 3TI^T $h^i<=b '^ITW^rf^T^T^T HiGH COURT OiF CikHAmSGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PBTITIOlN (2271 N0. 1955/2008 PBTITIONBRS 1. 2. RBSPONDBNT8 Venus 1. Sm Chs Duj|-ga Bai, Widow of late Muniia Lal Kewat, |i about 42 years S/o late Munna Lal Kewat, aged |ut 8 years, miaor, Bofh, R/o Melapai^i, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (CG) age^ Kui^iar, abo|i CMatidih Naakuoiya Eiai, ih4ndan Kewat 2. 3. Siiii Sm ORJ xuider Artlcle Dhlreadra Mislura. J. Mr. M.K, Sinha, counself Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Go\ Heard, By fhis petition petitioners have impugned the by the leanied 2nd Additionai U whereby fhe leamed Additior , miscellaaeous appeal preferred of the tdal Court, whereby preferred by the petttkmers/plaj tbje cbl^fd^l'1 'HP^ ^r.f^t <t^i^i< '^3ifim'3^r widow of late :. ShuJcwara Bai, wife of Bnjlal Kewat \. :. Maatiya Bai, wife ofTulsiraiii Kewat AU |fhree resident of Melapara, Cliantiditi Tahj. & Distt. Bilaspur (CG) 4, Sta^e of Chhatdsgarh tlirough Collector- Bil^spur (CG) L ORDBR yr fhe petitTOisers, ^, Advocate for the State, 227 ofthp Constitutioii ofindia, tfae ^rder dated 1 ldx Uecember 2007 passed ^stodct Judge, Bilaspur of aiinexare P-9, ^al Distnct Judge has dismitesed the ^y the petitioners aad upheM fhe order applicatioH for temporaiy mtiinction ta.tiffs, has been rejected, <3^T^T opT fqilcn TT^T 3TR?T $b^|cn 3-^T '-Ml'410'^, ^TQ^41C, {s)01'M^< ^l^dl *Nlch "^ 200 3?T^?T XR^ (4CI^<^) '^RiTW^I^T 3?TT^T pru^ia Both fhe Courts below, available before fhem, have pardes to fhe civil suit are join|l plaintiffs do not have any is also not in their favour aii<| to fhe plaintiffs and have iajunction. Leanied after gettiag their names are contemplating to toansfer been pubMshed ia ffae Annexure P-8 on the jconsidering fhe evidence and dociiinents ^rcorded a concurrent findiag that fhe owners ofthe property and, as such, fhe itia-facie case and bakuace of convenience no irreparable iajuries would be caused i|efected fheir applicatfon for temporaxy counsel for the^jpetitio: recoitled newsflapers respondents, The Courts ^l^- defendants fhat fhev are circuinslances passed the impugned order iajunction, In fhese witii liberty to the petitioners application for rcstraiaiiig tih|< propeny and ffaereby creatmg Iii view of the above petitioners, the instant petitlouers to approach the rcstramiag the defendants fhereby creating fhird party intJE petiqoa Nial <=t>i^(<n<fli 'HP^ff ^f^fe^t <RI<^I< ^3?tRW3TT^r stre|igth le^jpetitioners submits fhat the rcspondeats, ia the revenue records claiidestinely, Ihe suit laad, Public notices have alreadv by the intendmg purchaser vide of agreement executed by tfae b41ow relyiag uppn fhe deiiial of fhe cotltemplatmg to traiisfer the land^ have |:ejectmg fhe applfcation for temiwraiy ais^ances, tiiis y^tition may be disposed of approach the trial Court by filmg finesh tih|e defendasits fixxm aUeiiatmg fhe suit Ijhixd pariy iaterest ^prayer of fhe learaed couiisel for fhe is disposed of witfa ttoerty to fbe Court by filiag fresh appUcation Jbr 4:om alienatmg fhe suit property aad ifcontmgency so arises, ^ intjerest, ^^ ^^:w