IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-30431 of 2009 Date of decision:21.12.2009. Lakha Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Jagpal Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioners and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.133 dated 18.06.2009, under Sections 307, 160, 506, 148, 149 IPC, and 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, Police Station B Division, Amritsar (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. December 21, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE