1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.458 OF 2011 (Ganesh Hariprasad Borle and another .v. State of Maharashtra) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri A.M. Mane Patil, Advocate for the applicants. Shri M.A. Kadu, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 30TH AUGUST, 2011. Heard. By the present application, the applicants are challenging the order dated 19.07.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad. An application was moved by the applicants/accused for producing certain documents and recalling of witness. Learned APP had opposed the said application on the ground that there is no specification of the documents which were to be brought. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, on consideration of the application, observed that the witness which was sought to be recalled was on the point in respect of the consciousness of the patient while recording Dying Declaration. It was further observed that the witness was also not directed to produce the case papers of the patient and more particularly the witness was not on the point of the treatment to the patient. The perusal of the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge shows that neither any perversity nor illegality in the order is found. Even perusal of the application submitted by the applicants for seeking recall of the witness reveals that the application is as vague as it could be. The impugned order is just and proper. The application is devoid of merit and as such the same is rejected. JUDGE *rrg.