1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4095/2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4094/2009. (Anand Offset Printers Vs. Sanket Printing Machinery & Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 3 rd August, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.Girish Rane, learned Counsel for the applicant; and Mr. DG Kamble, learned Counsel for respondents. 2) Mr.Kamble for the respondents, states that, he has instructions to appear for the respondents and undertakes to file Vakalatnama within two days in the Registry. The said statement is accepted and taken on record. 3) This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 28 days caused in filing the accompanying criminal application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 20.07.2009. 4) Learned Counsel for the respondents opposed the present application and submitted that it bears no substance and, therefore, same be rejected. 2 5) After considering the rival submissions, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional and certainly it is not inordinate and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 6) In the result, the present application allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) thereof; and delay of 28 days caused in filing the accompanying criminal application seeking leave to file appeal, stands condoned and present application is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P.DAVARE) JUDGE bdv/4095.10cran