IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.747 of 2011 KAPIL MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 258 of 1993 registered under sections-147, 148, 149, 307, 364, 302/201, 436 & 427 of the Indian Penal Code. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the petitioner was earlier granted bail but after commitment of the case, he did not appear before the court concerned resulting into cancellation of his bail bonds. Subsequently, the petitioner was declared absconder but the order of learned Additional Sessions Judge does not disclose this fact as to whether any process was ever served upon the petitioner after commitment of the case. In the aforesaid circumstances the petitioner, namely, Kapil Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 258 of 1993 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 141 of 1998/16 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad. - 2 - It is made clear that the petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date for the period of nine months and if he fails to do so without any valid reason, the learned trial court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)