IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1417 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 28/04/2008 in WP NO : 7891 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: C.P.D.C of A.P Ltd Red Hills Rep.by its Chairman& Managing Director Hyd ..... APPELLANT AND K.V.Subbaiah S/o.Late Sri K.Pedda Subbaiah, R/o.28/852/B/1,Near CPM Office NGO's Colony Road Nandyal Kurnool Dist .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.P.R.BALARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.RAVINDRANATH The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Being aggrieved by the common order passed in W.P.Nos. 7889 of 2008 and batch, dated 28-4-2008, this appeal has been filed. We have heard the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant and have perused the impugned order as well as the show-cause notice dated 12-5-2005, on which much reliance has been placed by the learned Advocate for the appellant. Upon perusal of the papers, it is clear that the enquiry oﬃcer was of the view that the charges leveled against the concerned respondent-original petitioner had not been proved. In spite of that fact the disciplinary authority has issued notice calling upon the original petitioner to show- cause as to why punishment should not be inﬂicted upon him. In our opinion, the learned single Judge was justiﬁed in coming to the conclusion that the said procedure was not proper and, therefore, by virtue of the common order all the petitions have been allowed. We see no irregularity committed in the impugned order and, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ __________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 12th November, 2008. GRR