CRM No.M-28318 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-14.10.2010 Dilawar Singh son of Jai Narain ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Ms.Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Malik, A.A.G. Haryana. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Having exercised his right of regular bail and lost in the Court of Addl.Sessions Judge, petitioner Dilawar Singh s/o Jai Narain, has directed the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, vide FIR No.114 dated 23.2.2010, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 181, 182, 205, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B by the police of Police Station City Gurgaon, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this context. 4. What is not disputed here is that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate. As only three PWs have been examined by the prosecution, therefore, the conclusion of trial will naturally take long time. The petitioner was arrested on 5.4.2010 and since then he is in judicial CRM No.M-28318 of 2010 2 custody. There is no history of previous involvement of the petitioner in any such case. Moreover, no useful purpose would be served in further detaining the petitioner in jail. 5. So, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above, to me, the present petitioner is entitled to regular in the obtaining circumstances of the case. 6. In the light of the aforesaid reasons and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. 7. The instant petition is disposed of accordingly. 14.10.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge