^ ^v JN THE HIGH COURTOP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition Nod^tL/2004 PETITIONER Parsadi Ram @ PardesAd Ram^ > S/o Shri S. R. Shori, ^o^^ aged about 52 year^, worldng a» ^•••'.^^^ \ U-D-T- at Mid<31e School, Bhinjhe, ^"fe' /<^ ./-•;^07" .<^*'..--l/>' ^'- ' '^ RESPONDENTS /•^•.s^ 1. (1 ..^® 2. 3. •^z^ ^2- y G>" ^' Keshkal^ Uttar Baster, R/o Village- Kilepar, Post - Haradula, TahsU ~ Charaxnay Kanker (C.G.). Versus- State of Chhattisgarhs Through the Secretary Adim Jaiti Tafha Aausuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Mantrolaya^ Raipur (C«G<]|« Director, Adiio. Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.). CoUector (Adivashi Vikas Shakha) Jagdalpur (C.G.). Assistaat Director^ Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vlbhagy CoBectorate Bullding, Jagdalpur (Baster) (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDABflUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OE ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 <ffl^T'?FT Rt-Uch^I^l $b*lict» ^Rci w' f: 'S^ '^®^ fa^l<|iii< HIN<ni WHIW ^r^li^T' 'q^iR;^^^,'^ ^J^^.^^v\16 1^F6^T* n^i S^^ ^<TTW ^tT^CT ^rf^ 20/9/2004 urgenthea|ring " ' Shri Prashant Jaiswal, Shri V.V.S, Murthy, Dy. A| AppMcation for Heard. i Counsel for the petitione^ vkle order datedi 30-6-2003, Anrit :of the Lok Sabha and the Vidhaiji he has also made the repres^ concerned. It i8 also submitted not yet be^ri cancelled^ It is s\ .No.1465/04^ orders have been passed in tliis case also. .. State counsel does not disl Having' cohsidered the ;fac|t the fact that th^ elections fo the| been held and further^the fact yet cancelled then there is no rea( that the petitioaer wduld be re| weeks from the date of productioii With tliis.obseryation, this] Consequentiy, M.W.P. No. disposed of. , C.C. as per rules. Cp^nsel for the petitioner. ' ' r. with Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L for the State. is allpwed. ? chl4i<v<^'1 ^IW^ff'? fe^<Rl^i< ^37PW3TI^T submitted that'tlie pefitioner was t-ansferred sxure -- P/1, but has i^ot been relieved because Sabha .electioris. It is furtlier submitted that tntation for his reli^ing fo the aufhorities that tUe ti-ansfer order is ^tlU in force and has (ibmitted thafc in similar matter bearing W.P. )assed. He prays fltiat similar orders may be .fcute the fact ; j jts and circumstances|,material on record and Lok Sabha and Vidlaan Sabha tiave ah-eady as the transfer order of the peti-tioner is not !..."'• ••..'i- :IK.' >on irinot relievjing tirxe petitioner, itis dir^cted |ieved iby the authorfties concerned withm 3 of copy of this ©rderfoefore them. Ipetition is disposed of. .p520/200^ andJ,A.No;6205/2004 also stand tfilat Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^.-.pt^tR^