^-1^^ HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTI8GARHAT BILASPUR WR!TPETmQN{8IJ<p,25^2 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. 2. Siyaram Uike S/o Siiri FatteSihgh Uike Aged about 37 years Occupation—Patwari Patwari Halka no.38 Tahsil Office _- Konta Dist- Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Throu^i, Secretary, Department of Revenue Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Dantewada, Dist-Daatewada (C.G.) WRITPETmON LTSTDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shn SattshK. Agnihotei, J. Present: Miss Deepali Pandey, Advocatefor the petittoner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe StateA-espondente. : . ORALORDER 1. (Passed on 06m day of May, 2Q08) LsiMfed counsel appearingfor the pefitioner submits that Ihe petitioner was posted as Patwari in Patwari HalkaNo.38 Tahsil Office - Konta District Dantewada, The petitioner has been transferred to Patwan HaIkaNo. 5, Antagarh, District Kanker, vide order dated 25.06.2007. 2. This transfer has been made on tiie administrative ground. Despite the traiisfer order dated 25.06.2007, the petitioner has not been relieved fi-om the old place ofposting tojom his new place ofposting. 3. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, leamed counsel appearmg for'the State/respondents submits that as per policy, this are is specified as Scheduled Area and 's 7. persons cannot be relieved wifhout fhere being substitute for thesame. This is a case where the petitioner has been transfen-ed fi-om ose Scheduled Area to other Scheduled Area, thus, this clause may not be applicable to the instant petftion. The representation ofthe petitioner for relieving him to join the new place ofposting has become fiiiitless as the said transfer order has not been given effect to. Since the transfer order has been passed on admimstrative grounds, I do not fiad any reason notto relieve the petitioner from his old place of posting. The respondents are accordingly directedto make suitable arrangement wifhin a period offour weeks for relieving and allqwing the petitioner to join his new place ofposting. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed ofwifli above- stated directions. No order asto costs. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri ^; Judge ^.-