WP(C) 3200/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. N.KOTISWAR SINGH Heard Mr.P.Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.P.Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.1,2, 3 a nd 5. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the fact that even though she had been appointed as Anganwadi Work er for Madhupur Anganwadi Centre for which she had been issued appointment lette r dated 17.6.2010 to which she had submitted her acceptance , yet, the petitione r has not been allowed to join her service, and accordingly, the present writ pe tition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to allow her to work as Anganwadi Worker in terms of the appointment order issued to her. In this connection, the counsel for the respondents has stated t hat there is uncertainty as to whether she was appointed at all or not. Be that as it may, we are not inclined to go into the factual as pects in view of the fact that the petitioner has already submitted a representa tion to the Director of Social Welfare, Assam on 17.5.2011 requesting for allowi ng her to discharge the duties of Anganwadi Worker at Madhupur Angwadi Centre u nder Naduar ICDS Project. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, more particularly, the Director of Social W elfare, Assam to consider the representation of the writ petitioner and pass nec essary order in respect of the claim made by the petitioner by a speaking order and the same may be intimated to the petitioner. The aforesaid exercise may be c ompleted within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified c opy of this order. With the above observations and directions, the present writ pe tition is disposed of.