@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. No.“ % (@003 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ‘IESUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI N S I H ' O N TE 1g SHASHIDHAR SHARMA SON OF LATE RAM NARAYAN SHARMA, AGED 26 YEARS PROPRIETOR, M/s. SANTOSH KUMAR GANGADHAR RICE MILL RESIDENT OF MAIN 5 ROAD BHILAI 3 DISTT. DURG. i 2. SMT. SIDDHI DEVI SHARMA WIDOW OE LATE RAMNARAYAN SHARMA M 445;: I} ADULT RESIDENT OE MAIN ROAD, BHILAI DISTT. DURG. PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. UNION OE INDIA THROUGH E SECRETARY, MINISTRY i; OE LAW JUSTICE AND COMPANY AEEAIRS AND ALSO THROUGH THE g SECRETARY, MINISTRY OE FINANCE NEW DELHI I 2 STATE BANK OE INDIA A KS: E4 ‘ , ‘E‘erae: ‘ E BANKING COMPANY Raw if CONSTITUTED UNDER THE I: f RELEVANT PROVISIONS OE f cm STATE BANK OE INDIA ACT “M 1955 HAVING ITS INTERALIA gW :g AMONGST OFFICES A BRANCH OFFICE AT NEORA RAILWAY (MW/9; STATION TILDA, ROAD, RESPONDENTS RAIPUR f I HON’BLE SHRI A S VENKATACHAI MOORTHY CJ r& HON’BLE SHRI FAKHRUDDIN J 29/06/2004 - 2 ’ a ' nse . Shn BP Sharm l'fo'r epetition‘ers Shn Vnay Hant S Standing el for the ion o Ini, for respondent N for-the responden No.2. t Followmg the demsmn of the upreme Court In the matter of v .Mardla chemical Ltd. Vs Union of In ‘ a 2004 AIR scw 2541), he wrrt 0 ,petmon stands dtsmlss _ wh dit o d t f * However It ereasecured creor has v taken action under Section 13(4 f the Securitisation an ‘Reconstructron of Financial Assets and nforcement of Security'- lnterest Act 2002 in such cases It would be open to borrowers to file ~:appeals under Sechon 17 of the Act Within he Iimihtfon as» V E prescribed thereor, to be counted with effect fromEa/y/ Sdl- Chief Jusu‘ce ‘ DISI ' x f VION BENCH ‘ LA Couns Un f da o 1 ( t ed ‘