1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 123 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3327 OF 2004 Kaushik Ashok Patil.. ...... ..... Petitioner. Versus District Supply Officer, Jawhar Head Office, District Thane & Ors. ... ..... .... Respondents. None present for the Petitioner. Mr. R. M. Patne, AGP for Respondent No.1. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED : 7TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. : This is a review petition filed seeking review of the order passed by this Court on 16th April, 2004. 2. After issuing show cause notice, charges have been framed against the petitioner, proceedings have been initiated and after considering the evidence on record, the licence for ration shop was canceled. In appeal also the order was upheld. This Court dismissed the petition holding that in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction, this court would not reappreciate the evidence on record. 3. The only ground in review is that this Court had over looked the law 2 laid down by the Supreme Court on the aspect of reappreciation of evidence. This well said. This Court would generally reappreciate the evidence and disturb the conclusion arrived at by the quasi-judicial authority or by the judicial authority, unless it is shown that the conclusions arrived at on facts were based on no evidence. Neither it was shown to the Court earlier that it was a finding based on no evidence, or it was shown today as nobody even appears for the petitioner. 4. In the circumstances, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (S. A. BOBDE, J.)