IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : R. S. A. No. 1792 of 2008 Date of Decision : May 11, 2010 Mewa Singh .... Appellant Vs. Ravinder Singh and another .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Anupam Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.1 – Caveator. Appellant and respondent no.1 also in person. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Appellant and respondent no.1 have effected compromise in this appeal. Their joint statement regarding the compromise has been recorded separately and is reproduced hereunder :- “Stated that we have effected amicable settlement in this case. As per compromise effected by us, plaintiff- respondent no.1 shall, within two months from today, pay to defendant no.1-appellant a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- in the account of defendant no.1 bearing No. 9640 in Central R. S. A. No. 1792 of 2008 : 2 : Bank of India, Village Ugala Branch, District Ambala (as per version of defendant no.1- appellant) and thereupon, defendant no.1- appellant shall be left with no right, title or interest in the suit plot and plaintiff- respondent no.1 or his mother shall be absolute owner in possession of the suit plot and if any document is required to be executed for the same, defendant no.1 shall execute the same. However, if respondent no.1 fails to pay the amount of Rs.5,00,000/- within the stipulated period, the instant appeal shall stand allowed and judgments and decrees of the courts below shall stand set aside and suit filed by plaintiff-respondent no.1 shall stand dismissed. The appeal be decided accordingly.” The appeal has thus been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of above statement, which shall also form part of the decree sheet. May 11, 2010 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE