( 1 ) cria4985.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4985 OF 2010 1. Prakash s/o. Raosaheb Jadhav .. Applicants Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. 2. Baburao s/o. Atmaram Jadhav Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. 3. Subhash s/o. Atmaram Jadhav Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. 4. Ganpat s/o. Atmaram Jadhav Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. 5. Chandrakant s/o. Raosaheb Jadhav Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. 6. Shrinivas s/o. Ganpat Jadhav Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. 7. Sanjay s/o. Raosaheb Jadhav Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Nanda (Bk), Tq. Bhokar, Dist. Nanded. ( 2 ) cria4985.10 Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P.P. More, A.P.P. for the respondent/State. CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR,J. DATED : 22.12.2010 P.C. :- 1. This is an application for bail. The applicants are arrested in connection with Crime No. 81 of 2010 registered at Umri Police Station, for various offences punishable under sections 147, 149, 324, 325 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned A.P.P. Perused investigation papers. It prima facie appears that the incident occurred as a sequel to the Grampanchayat elections. It is alleged that on 28.10.2010 informant Shivaji Jogdand and others were proceeding on motor-cycle. The applicants intercepted them. The applicants assaulted them by means of sticks, knife and axe. Thereafter, the applicants went to the house of Subhadrabai ( 3 ) cria4985.10 Kadam. They asked her as to where was Madhav Kadam. They ransacked the domestic articles in the house. 3. It appears that the applicants were irked due to adverse election results. On perusal of the seven medico- legal certificates, it transpires that the applicants did not cause injury on any vital parts of the victims. It appears that the main intention of the applicants was to take revenge and to cause injuries to the panel leader, by name, Madhav Kadam and his supporters. 4. The fact that no injury was caused on vital parts of the body of the victims and the investigation is almost completed go to show that detention of the applicants is no more required. The learned advocate for the applicants would submit that the applicants are ready and willing to abide themselves by any conditions that may be imposed while granting liberty. They are ready to reside away from Bhokar taluka, so as to dispel any apprehension about the influence over the witnesses. ( 4 ) cria4985.10 5. Taking overall view of the matter, the application is allowed. The applicants are directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds in sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with solvent surety bonds in like sum to the satisfaction of the Court of Sessions and on further condition that the applicants shall not enter limits of Bhokar taluka during pendency of the investigation and during the period of Trial except for attending the effective dates of hearing of the Sessions Case. They have furnish an undertaking to such an effect simultaneously while furnishing the bail bonds. They shall also report their addresses and contact numbers to the concerned police station as well as to the Sessions Court, Bhokar and shall make themselves available as and when required. They shall not contact any of the prosecution witnesses and shall make no attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence. [V.R. KINGAONKAR,J.] snk/2010/DEC10/cria4985.10