’V\ XLHC~22 25-03-Qi}&§ Shri Anup Mazumdar, counsel for 15116 petitioner. Shri DR. Agm‘wal, Dy. Adv. Gal. for thti State. Haard. The petitioner was; elected Singharqaur Jangal. On EEO—102602 a m€eti11g o which a matian of no coniidencs Aggrieved therewith m6 pstitione Collsctor, Kwardha which is p6 staying thC moti011 of no confidtm‘ mjcctcd thc pmitioncr is baforc this Court for mlicf. the no coafidence mo/tion being According to the petitioner contrarv to law callnot be sustajlr )d and is liable to be quashed. It 1$ further submitted that notice a: ¥/‘ invaiidates the proceedings. Thes‘e are. however, points, which need. to be determined in the diepute which is admittedly penciing. At the time of healing it was fairly stated by the learned State is pending, the petition may be. counsel that since the. dispute as Sarpamch of Gram Pa11chayat f Gram Pwchavat was convanecl 1'11 was; passed against tins petitions); r had raissd a diSpute bEfora the admg. A11 application praying for CE was mmmd but that having bami ; required was not selved which we W gz,‘ r diSposed of by ciil‘ectillg the Autj withm a Stipulated pEm’od.’ Accordi11g1v, this writ patition is. No.2— Collector, Kwardha to di$pg €ight weekS from the data of coxx copy of this order aftor homing t1} i. With the. aforoSaid oboervat sTaJlds disposed‘ of. Conssqusn No.8280,’ 2002 for urgalt healjhg C61Titied copy as p61“ Rules. / J /\ \ \‘ unity to dispose of The proceediilgS Statement appears to be fair. disposed of by (iirecijiig respondent )se of the thspute Wiihjii a pen‘oti of {municationf receipt of the certified e parses. ions mid d'neciions this writ petition tly M.W,P. No.1689/2002 and LA. also swim disoosed of. / ///sal— noN $3“ yidge ,./ \ x [WW Wrwq‘i’aa War 2m) \ 31m! ma?m / 2// WWW? WY fgirm %7 31W a