IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1602 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 3, 2009. Dulla Haji Mohant ...Petitioner(s) v. Shri Nau Nihal Singh, SSP, Sangrur ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Vivek Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that despite the directions given by this Court vide order dated 19th December, 2008 in Crl.Misc. No.M-33616 of 2008, the respondent has failed to decide the representation of the petitioner. Notice of motion. At the asking of the court, Shri S.S. Sahu, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Copies of the petition have been supplied to him. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and without going into the averments made in the petition, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner, which was attached with Crl. Misc. No.M-33616 of 2008, in accordance with law, if not decided already, within two months. In case the aforesaid representation stands decided, a copy of the order be supplied to the petitioner. With aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. September 3, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge