[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1623/2007 SITARAM & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN Date: 22/02/2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. N.K. Singhal for the accused-petitioners. Mr. Jagdish Lamba, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** The present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the accused- petitioners against the order dated 11.07.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Bharatpur in Criminal Revision No. 81/2005, whereby the criminal revision filed by the petitioners has been dismissed upholding the order dated 11.03.2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bharatpur in Criminal Case No. 82/2005 by which cognizance for the offences under Sections 420, 467 and 471 IPC has been taken against the accused-petitioners. Brief facts of the case are that a FIR was lodged at Police Station Udyog Nagar, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 420, 465, 471 467 and 474 IPC on the complaint filed by [2] complainant Jalsingh. After investigation, the police submitted the final report before the competent Court. The complainant protested against the final report and filed a protest petition and accepting the protest petition filed by the complainant, the trial Court took cognizance against the accused-petitioners for the offences under Sections 420, 467 and 471 IPC vide its order impugned dated 11.03.2004 and summoned the accused-petitioners through bailable warrants. Aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order of the trial Court dated 11.03.2005, the accused- petitioners have filed a criminal revision which was came to be dismissed by the Revisional Court i.e. Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Bharatpur vide its order impugned dated 11.07.2007 observing that the order of the trial Court is just and proper and require no interference by the Revisional Court. I have heard rival submissions of the respective parties and carefully gone through the orders impugned passed by the trial Court as also the Revisional Court and also gone through the judgment referred by the learned counsel for the petitioners. This Court finds no illegality or error in taking cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 420, 467 and 471 IPC and not [3] accepting the final report submitted by the police as concurrent findings have been given by both the Court below which require no interference by this Court. Even otherwise also, at the time of taking cognizance, the Court has only to see whether prima- facie case is made out against the accused or not, and as in the instant case the trial Court found that prima-facie case for the offences under Sections 420, 467 and 471 IPC is made out, therefore, cognizance for the aforesaid offences has been taken against the petitioners and upheld by the Revisional Court. Thus, this Court finds no illegality or error in the orders impugned warranting any interference by this Court. Consequently, the criminal misc. petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE)J. /KKC/ [4]