IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.11671 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 05, 2011. Santosh Kumari .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is claiming three annual increments with effect from the date of her adhoc appointment. She relies upon some Government Instructions including dated 11.10.1991 (Annexure P-7). Having heard learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any views on the petitioner's entitlement, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim in the light of the aforementioned Government Instructions, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. CWP No.11671 of 2010 [2] Subject to the decision to be taken by the Competent Authority pursuant to the directions given above, the claim of the petitioner for the grant of ACP increment shall also be considered. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 05, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE