IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8746/2008 Decided on:9.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Devinder Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 4. Respondents No.5 and 6 already ex parte. None for respondents No. 7 and 8. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.7 to the post of Vidya Upasak in Government primary School, Tiyasar under Himachal Pradesh Gram Vidya Upasak Yojna, 2001. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.7 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has secured 62.4 marks and 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 respondent No.7 has secured 65.2 marks. Since the suitability of the candidates has been adjudged by a duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. No mala fides have been alleged against the members of the Selection Committee. 2. Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the Gram Vidya Upasak Yojna, 2001 has been scrapped by the State Government and no appointments are being made under the Scheme. Since the scheme has been scrapped by the State Government, no effective directions can be issued to it to consider the case of the petitioner under the non-existence scheme. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 9.12.2010 *awasthi*