IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 710 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Venu Lawai S/o Late Sri Late Sri Beswel Lawai. 2. Ankit Lawai S/o Sri Venu Lawai. Both R/o H-100 Patel Nagar II, Ghaziabad (U.P.). ….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secreatry, Home, Civil Secretariat, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Rajpur, District Dehradun. 3. Nisha Devi D/o Israel, R/o 63/1 Bapu Nagar, Jakhan, Rajpur, District Dehradun. …….. Respondents JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Jagdish Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Prabha Noliyal, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, the learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Venu Lawai and Ankit Lawai seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 19.06.2006 stands vacated automatically. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 07.09.2006 07.09.2006 G