: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.402 OF 2007 Shri Ashpak Ahmed @ Guddu Mohd. Isaq Choudhary ...Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Ms.Bhavana Meghnani with Sudeep Pasbola, advs. for the Applicant. Shri D.P.Adsule, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 30TH April, 2007. DATE : 30TH April, 2007. DATE : 30TH April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Ms.Bhavna Meghnani the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Adsule the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 376 of the I.P.C. and was sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- on the first count, R.I. for 3 years and to pay fine Rs.50,000/- on the second count. The applicant has preferred an appeal challenging the conviction and sentence. Appeal is admitted. By this application, the applicant seeks to be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. It is pointed out by the learned counsel that during the trial the applicant : 2 : was on bail and there is nothing to show that he had misused the bail. The trial Court also noted that the prosecutrix appears to be a consenting party as they wanted to marry each other. In these circumstances, the applicant is granted bail pending the appeal on same terms and conditions as before the trial Court subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds and depositing fine amount. 3. Application stands disposed off. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) : 3 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.402 OF 2007 Shri Ashpak Ahmed @ Guddu Mohd. Isaq Choudhary ...Appellant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Ms.Bhavana Meghnani with Sudeep Pasbola, advs. for the Appellant. Shri D.P.Adsule, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 30TH April, 2007. DATE : 30TH April, 2007. DATE : 30TH April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Ms.Bhavna Meghnani the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.Adsule the learned APP for the State. 2. Admit. (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.)