an IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OFJUDICATURE FOR CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Tax Case No. e^ oltSOlS ^£'I'l I?- -• " l.'i'>ll n Appellant ^ssessee) \^ ^o ^.eA^'^ »»>•• ^ f \,^v ^-M/s. Ghhattisgarh Electricity Co. Ltd., (now known as Sarda Energy&Minerals Ltd.) Siltara Industrral Growth Centre, Siltara, Raipur Versus Respondent (Revenue) : ^- Commissioner Central Excise, Tikra Para, Raipur(C.G.) MemoofAppeal under section35G ofthe Central Excise Act1944 I._ ^s^~'\. i \ ^?^.. H fwc^ -78 iiTHRir i»t*<t<t» -s-£[^|A|M^, •®Tft:HTR,l^reg,^ ^.G^C£^J^/h ff^ tw^ ^^ 1 (^ 3IR?i/1tTaW (•^3^1) sn^i •W !<{-ii+ "^ST? SH^T sSt-ft^) Amit 4 ir^lTWHfttl •CT^I Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnlhott-i & Hon'bie Shri Radhe Shyam Sh^rma, >?>}. coitisel Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate f<jr the appellant Hsard. On the request of iearned further three weeks time is granted to out by the office, falling whfch the appei prosecution, without referencetothe Co|jrt. ^ir'ift-f7^ TV^ 's. fezt xfezp •^SffiTO 3tI^?I appearing for the appeilant, (nake good the defautt as pointed Vi shail stand dismissed for want of Sd/- satisb^Agn^tri «/u<lge Sd/- R-S.Sharma Judge + o k- "eoTCase <PR) No. 1843720TO- 9^ wc ey fc/ XV-OR-] This case was listed before Divislon Bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnlhotri & Hon'bls Mr. Justice Raahe Shyam Sharma on 29.09.2011 for orders on defaults i.e. (1) Certifjed copy of impugned order and service certificateis not fifed with meirio of appeai, and (2) Copy of appeats filed before Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal is not fited as per rute 378 and^380 ofthe C.G. (-iigh Court Rules, 07, andonthe date Hon'bte Coyrt ordered as under- "On the request < appearing for theappeilant, tlme is grantsd to make good out by the office, failing stand dismissed for want reference to the Court." of tearned counsel further three weeR's the defauitas poisitt which the appeal shail ef prosecutson, withput It is pertinent to mention' here that no any appiteation or document has been filed by the counsel for the applieant within time as granted by the Hon'bte Court. :! It is worthwhile to mention here that the counsel for the applicant has filed application for taking ciocuments on record, certified oopy of impugned order & service certificate, and copy of memo of appeal before Tribunal on 22.11.2011 i.e. after stipuiated period as grarted by the Hon'bte Court vide order dated ^.09.2011, hence thecase is liable to be dismissed. In view of the above, as per peremptory Court'sorder dated 29.09.2011, the instant case is treated as dismissed, Counsel be informed accordingly. '\. ^ -L Sd/- A.R (J) 'v—"— \- Section Officer (Civil)