1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4344 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6604 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. J.N. Singh, Adv. for applicant. Mr. S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2009 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the respondent. Present Civil Application is preferred by the respondent raising preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent - original petitioner states that the petition is admitted after hearing both the sides. There is no liberty granted by this Court to the applicant - original respondent for raising preliminary objection regarding 2 maintainability of present Writ Petition. 3. Considering these facts, present Civil Application is rejected. 4. It is needless to state that the applicant can raise this objection at the time of final disposal of Writ Petition. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/AUG09/ca4344.09