1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION (L) NO.125 OF 2009 Bevenue Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate with Mr.F. Pooniwala and Ms.Sheetal S. Shah i/b. M/s.Mehta Girdharlal for the Petitioner. Mr. G.W. Mattos, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.Ivor Peter D'Cruz for Respondent No.3. ..... CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 10, 2009. P.C. : We have heard Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Primarily it would have been appropriate for the Petitioner to approach the High Powered Committee in accordance with the notification issued by the State Government. However, it is contended by the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner that one of the basic questions is only with regard to the issuance of NOC. 2 The said request is stated to be pending with the MHADA. Counsel appearing on behalf of the MHADA submits that the possibility of issuance of NOC to the Petitioner is doubtful since NOC is granted to the tenants. We do not wish to travel into the merits or otherwise. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct MHADA to deal with the request of the Petitioner for issuance of NOC in accordance with law and policy within three months from today after hearing all the affected parties. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.