IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2008 / 20TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1200 of 2008(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- R.S.PRADEEP, S/O.V.RAMACHANDRAN, SUMA NIVAS, KAVANADU P.O., MEENATHUCHERY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PRASAD SRI.ABHILASH S.FRANCIS RESPONDENT: ---------------- THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, SQUAD NO.III, KOLLAM 691021. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO.1200 OF 2008 P ===================== Dated this the 10th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T The only grievance that is highlighted before me is in respect of Ext.P2. In terms of Ext.P2, consignment of sanitary items were detained. Petitioner now submits that though he is willing to provide security as directed in Ext.P2, the respondent is not willing to accept such security and release the goods on that basis. I see no basis for the apprehension of the petitioner. If the petitioner is providing security as demanded in Ext.P2, he is entitled to have the goods released. 2. Yet another complaint of the petitioner is that the respondent is not accepting his objections of Ext.P2. Here again, I see no basis for this apprehension since respondent is bound to accept any objection that the petitioner may file against Ext.P2. WPC 1200/08 :2 : 3. In view of this, I dispose of this writ petition directing that on the petitioner furnishing security as demanded by them in Ext.P2, the same shall be accepted and acted upon. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp