IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.4205 of 2007 Date of Decision:18.09.2009 Gobind Lal and others .....Petitioners Versus Harminder Kaur and others ...Respondents Present: Mr.Nitin Jain, Advocate for Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the trial has commenced and it is in progress. The civil revision is against the order in an interlocutory application for injunction. At the time of admission on 26.08.2008, this Court had directed the status quo regarding possession, as obtaining on 26.08.2008, is to be maintained and that the respondents will also be restrained from alienating the suit property. The same order shall continue till the disposal of the suit. This order has been passed without entering into the merits of the respective contentions of the parties to ensure that the trial of the suit, in any way, may not be hampered by the pendency of the civil revision petition. 2. The civil revision petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 18, 2009 Pankaj*