IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8604 of 2009 MANOJ SINGH @ MANOJ KUMAR, S/o Shri Naval Singh, R/o village-Dhanaur, P.S.-Katra, District-Muzaffarpur. …………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……….. Opp. Party. ----------- 3/ 11.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner’s name has transpired during investigation as an accused in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 44 of 2008 registered for offence under Section 395 and 397 of the IPC. As per the allegation Rs. 3,17,890/- was looted from the bank. Petitioner’s name has transpired on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, namely, Mukesh Kumar. Considering the allegation and also the criminal antecedent, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In case petitioner surrenders or taken into custody he should be put on T. I. Parade for identification. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)