^- HI6H COURT OP CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (6) No. 26% ®f2007 Petitioners 1. E»u-goShankar Diwan Age about 37 yeor, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Ourjan Singh Oiwan ft-imary Schoot Idiutiyapn'a (Sonabal) Btock- Kondogaon, Distt. Boster 2. Lakhnu Rom Korge Age cbout 40 Ysw, Asstt. Teacher S/o Shri Dhaniram Kange Villoge- Kahoragondi, Post- Puri Distt. Boster (C.6.) Vereus Respondents l. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tirbal Wetfore Deportment & Educotion Oeptrtment, &.K.S. Bhawan, Roipur (C.©.) 2. Astt. Commissioner Officer Bastar, t>istricf-Bast<r (C.6.) 3. Block Education Officer, Kondagaai, &istrict - Baster 4. Treasure & Accoimts Bosttr, bistrict- Bastar (C.©.) Writ petition under Article 226 of the fanslttulion of Indis Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. AgriboW. Present: Mr. Somkant Verma, AdvocBt-e for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind DiAaey, Pcnel Lawyer for the State. OR&ER 0>assed on 4"1 bay of May, 2007) 1. The question of l(Wf involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regulorpay scale w.e.f. the dcrt-e of initiol appointment or •from the date of completion of probotion period. 2. Lewned counsel qapewing for the petitioners as well as for the State/re^wndents Jointly submit that the facts and question of low involved in the present writ petition are the same as to thot of in W. P. (S) No. 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain vs. The Stale &wemment *\ -^•aaiK- Gihattisgorh & another), fBhich was dispwed of vide order dated 10.11,2006. 3. In view of the above-stoted sAmjsions made by leamed counsel for -the parties, ttie writ petition is disposed of in the some terms. No orderas to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihoiri Judge ¥-