IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.8895 of 2003 Between: V.KONDAIAH S/O.LAKSHMANA MURTHY R/O.S.NO.11-41,SANAR STREET, CHOWDAVARAM, VISK,DIST. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 THE DIVI.RAILWAY MANAGER (COMMERCIAL)S.C. O/O.THE DIVI.RAILWAY MANAGER (COMMERCIAL),SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 2 THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL INSPECTOR, O/O.THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL INSPECTOR, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY TUNI W.G.DIST. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in suspending the petitioner's agency vide in his proceedings under Ref.NO.B/c.217/TBA/chodavaram/23A, dt.27-1-2003 issued on 28-1-2003 of the 2nd respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary,unjust and against to the terms/conditions of the agreement dt. 11-6- 2002 which infact came into force from 1-4-2001 and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.M.SUBBAIAH SASTRY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.8895 of 2003 ORDER: None appears. The matter relates to suspension of Booking Agency during the agreement period. As the agreement itself has been over, the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 26-03-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }