IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4955 of 2010 RAJNISH KUMAR @ CHANCHAL THAKUR SON OF MUKESH THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.4.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report. However, subsequently when he was arrested, he was put on test identification parade, where two witnesses identified him. On the last occasion, an argument had been made that the petitioner is physically deformed, on account of which the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur was asked to make a physical assessment of the petitioner, but he has reported that he did not find the petitioner physically deformed. A supplementary affidavit has been filed today once again stating that the petitioner is physically deformed. However, in view of the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, I am not inclined to accept the documents annexed with the supplementary affidavit. In view of the merits of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it expeditiously in view of the seriousness of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )