:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5839 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 5839 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 5839 OF 2005 Lt. Col. (Retd) Kumarsingh Ratra .....Petitioner. vs. Mrs. Ranjana Singh Ratra .....Respondent. Ajay Joshi and V.B. Tapkiri for the petitioner. Ms. Revati Mohite and Ms. Sangeeta Chaudhary for the respondent. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. DATED: 2ND MAY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. The order datedc 4.8.2005 pased in Petition No. B/14 of 2005 Exhibit 6 is challenged by this petiton. 2. The petitioner and respondnet are the husband and wife. The flat in question is the matrimonial home of the respondent. A divroce petition filed by the petitioner husband has :2: been dismissed in earlier round of litigations. Thereafter since the husband has tried to dispose off the flat which is the matrimonial home, the application has been filed seeking an injunction. There is no dispute over the fact that the flat in question is the matrimonial house. The property is the matrimonial home of the respondent wife and the if the husband is permitted to sell away the property then in that circumstances the wife will have to come on road and thus the husband having lost in earlier round of litigations is trying to throw away his wife by selling the property. Therefore the family court is right in granting injunction. No interference is called for. Petition fails. Hence rejected. (S.B. MHASE, J)