IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13485 of 2011 PRADEEP KUMAR SEN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner has filed a case in case of misuse in connection with Trial No. 1687 of 2011 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1166C of 2002 in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323. 341. 504. 506 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that once the petitioner’s application under Section 317 of the Cr.P.C. was refused on 28.03.2011 and prior to that the petitioner has no knowledge about the case. 2 The anticipatory bail of the petitioner is not maintainable since the petitioner was on bail earlier. In the circumstances, let the learned court below pass an appropriate order with regard to the regular bail of the petitioner provided the petitioner appears within a period of two weeks from the receipt of the order and if possible, dispose off the regular bail application of the petitioner preferably on the same. Let the order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)