FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1387 OF 2006 (Dilip Nathu Chaudhari Vs. Sk. Firoz Sk. Gulam & ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri J.R. Shah, Advocate for applicant Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for State ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 5th April, 2011 1. Heard Mr. Shah and learned A.P.P. The complainant, feels aggrieved by order of release on bail of respondent Nos.1 to 8 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar dated 1.2.2006 in Criminal Bail Application No.12/2006. 2. Perusal of the order under challenge, I do not find any infirmity. The discretion that the learned Judge has exercised was in tune with the available record. No infirmity or illegality to brand the order as perverse. Additionally, the time spent in between also calls to be considered. No merit, application dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/cri1387.06