^ Ulfs j^'y?i"irvr 'A'ritBstjfion,(S)__No,_%90_of 2.007 i ^13^>3</\/3 l^i^aci ^ Vishnu Kumar Ga'/i'al, S/o. Krishna Chsnd Gs\y3l. sasd sbout 34 vssrs, res'dent of Vlllage jharnadeeh, P.0. Barnai Dadar Thsna Basna, Dist. Mahasamund. CG Versus 'l. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Gram Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan; Raipur, CG. 2, The Collector. Dist. Mahasamund, CG. 3. T'ne C'nisf Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Dist. Mahasamund. 4. Shri Tosh Kurnar Pradhan. S/o. Shri Ramlal Pradhan Jhaarendih P.0. Barnai Dadar Thans Basna, District Mahassmund. CG. f.'Vrit Petition under Ariic!e 226 of t'ne Constitution of india', SB: Hon'bte 5hn 'resent: Shrl Anurag Jha, counsel for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for respondents No. 1 to 3/State. ^nd (Passea on 3"~ May, 20071 1. Lsarned counsei appearing for the petitioner has fiied this petition v/ith foiiowinc: Draver: "that the writ petition be disoosed off at the earliest. Anv other order or directions as deemed fit and proper may also be oasssd in the intsrest o- justice." 2; On perusai of the pleadings particuiariy in vie.'i/ of the prayer sought for, tne petitioner has not made out anv case for any retef. Raiu 3. Thus, this petition is dismissecl. Sd/- saGsb^^ udge