HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH C.C.No.1395 of 2010 O R D E R: This Contempt Case is filed by the petitioner complaining the non- compliance of the Common Order passed by this Court on 13.04.2010 in W.P.Nos.3951 and W.P.No.6626 of 2005. The petitioner is the petitioner in both the writ petitions. W.P.No.3951 of 2005 was filed by the petitioner seeking direction to respondents to fix the regular pay scale attached to the post of the Grade-I Hindi Pandit from the date of absorption into Grant-in-Aid with effect from 12.06.1997 and to declare the action of the respondents in not fixing the pay scale as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. W.P.No.6625 of 2005 was filed by the petitioner seeking issuance of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings Rc.No.6797/A1/2001 dated 16.03.2005 issued by 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.100 and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay the petitioner the regular pay scale attached to the post of Grade- I Hindi Pandit. In proceedings No. Rc.No.6797/A1/2001 dated 16.03.2005, the 3rd respondent cancelled the earlier orders passed by 3rd respondent dated 17.06.2002 and directed the 4th respondent to take action for payment of stipend as per G.O.Ms.No.100 Edn. Dated 16.08.2001 and to fix the pay of the petitioner in regular scale of pay after completion of two years stipendary period as required under the rules. On 13.04.2010, this Court passed an order in W.P.No.6625 of 2005 setting aside the order impugned therein and in W.P.No.3951 of 2005, this Court declared that the petitioner is entitled for pay fixation and the respondents are directed to fix the pay attached to the post of Gr.I Hindi Pandit with effect from 12.06.1997 notionally till 15.09.2001, the date on which permission was accorded by the Government for filling up the vacancy by the petitioner and that the petitioner is entitled for increments from 12.06.1997 to 17.06.2002 notionally and the said exercise shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of that order. Complaining that the said order was not complied with, the present contempt case is filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the common order passed by this Court in the above mentioned two petitions, the respondent-Government filed a Writ Appeal. While admitting the writ appeal, the Division Bench of this Court granted interim suspension of the common order passed in the above writ petitions and the writ petitioner in the writ petition filed the vacate stay petition. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the Contempt Case does not survive. Hence, the Contempt Case is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J 11th April, 2011 PNV