V ^f <^< IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. 23 /2005 PETITIONERS 1. Sajjan Sfngh, son of Shri Nawal Singh, aged about 59 years, resident of viltage Pattharpunjt Tah. Berla, Distt. \ Durg (Chhattisgarh) T,» ..'.'' \ !Si]^y !•'•''- s -"lnfi\ ^t- ^- L^ &~~>^<1V^ ^.:l^$c' t^'^' '^ ^ '..--^ ^^•\^:-0' ^^^'Q r\c /' ^r^ \<Al[6y ,..r-;.^ :..;\M - ;,-ciio> ^ 2. Raj singh, son of Shri Singh, aged about 32 years, resident of village Pattharpunj^ Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) f^L^ 3. Krishna Kumar WI^^K son of Shri Umed Singh, resident of village Patharpunf( Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4. Jitendra, son of Om Prakash, aged about 35 years, resii of village Karmal, Tah. Berla7 Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 5. Dharmveer, son of Shri Kawal Singh, aged about 34 years, resident of village Silghat, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 6. Jitendra Maurya, son of Fatehsingh, aged about 32 years, resident of village Behra, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 7. Ranjeet Singh son of Shri Chand Singh, aged about 30 years, resident of village isiai y<:r •^ Behra, Tah. Berla, Disft. Durg (C.G.) 8. Raghuveer Singh, son of Shri Ramdiya, aged about 45 years, resident of village Behra, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 9. Lal Chandra Verma, son of Shankar Das, aged about 50 years, resident of village Wasa, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 10. Mukesh Verma, aged about 32 years, resident of Heera Verma, resident of Sankara, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Ei.sSiig& ^"fS&'^^.. - ^5^^ 11. Dalbeer Singh, son of Shri rt/ R't4 paJ Singh, aged about 50 years, resident of village Hasda, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 12. Indraveer Singh, aged about 30 years, son of Shri Hoshiyar Singh, resident of village Akoli, Tah. Beria, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) ,13. Ramchandra, son of Shri Dullichand, aged about 60 years, resident of village Akoli, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 14. Jasveer Singh, son of 'Mahendra Singh, aged about 32 years, resident of village Bahunwagaon, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. (Chhattisgarh) Durg 15. Sunil Kumar, son of Ram Kumar, aged about 30 years, resident of village Charbhata, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 16-,, Ajeet Singh, son of Shri Kamal ' singh, aged about 40 years, resident of village Nohinabhata, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 17 ^" 18, f^ ^- 'I -^, ^ w^ /^^s^ ••' p-s ^r-(. »?';ftffi ' wyss? /. 19, 20 21 Dharmveer Singh, son of Shri Prithwi Singh, aged about 40 years, resident of village Koniya, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) JHe-'flc/y^ son of Shri Ishwar Singh, aged about 40 years, resident of village Hardi, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Saranjeet Kaur, wife of Shri Saheb Sinigh, aged about 30 years, resident of village Hardi, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Pradeep, son of Shri Mahendra Singh, aged about 30 years, resident of Hardi, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) Riajendra Singh, aged about 57 years, son of Shri Kaluram, resident of village Bilai, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG) •Ri7;s'°^':'?^^^ESSi'-5il^@i..B;i'S^'y :EKES':?@.^ii ';%"S^'^:i^ 22. Rajrani,wifeof Shri Lakhbeer Singh, aged about 50 years, resident of village Beejabhata, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 23. Manjeet Singh, son of Shri Randheer Singh, aged about 26 years, resident of Chharbhata, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 24.^. Dharmpal Singh, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Tekram, residentof village Fatti, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) .25. Sukhbeer Singh, son of Shri Samay Singh, aged about 29 years, resident of village Charbhata, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ."• fs/Tes^ 26. Jagat Singh, son of Shri Hawa singh, aged about 35 years, resident of village Rajkundi, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 27. Ramesh Kumar, son of Shri Sune Singh, aged about 35 years, resident of village - Jewra, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 28. Ram Dayal Patel, son of Shri Jhuluram, aged about 38 years, resident of village - Si.ghauri, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) ^ ^nSB^ .^•^:^-^^ -^-^<;^ 29. Bijendra Singh, aged about 38 years, son of Shri Bheem Singh, resident of Charbhata, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 30. Bhagwan, aged about 35 years, son of Shri Fateh , Singh, resident of viltage \ Matka, Tah. Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 31. Randheer Singh, son of Maha Singh, aged about 35 years, resident of - Rakhi, Berla, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 32. Jasveer Singh, son of Shri Makkhan Singh, aged about 36 years, Resident of Rakhi, Tah. Beral, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4£J^T:^ ,- ^^i-^ ' 33 iS£g;'^,f^ r VERSUS Pawan Plantation Pvt Ltd., through : Its Incharge / Authorized signatory, Jayant Bhai, son of Shri Hari Bhai, aged about 55 years,, Tah. Beral, Distt. Durg (CG) RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) r-?//os c,s 3!-i:<^^^ -*Si£:/< y ^ i 7'lh 2. The Director, Agriculture Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3, The Cane Commissioner, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 4. The Collector, Kabeerdham <'" (Chhattisgarh) •^-5. The Managing Director, \ Bhauramdeo Co-operative Soogar Mill, Kabeerdham (CG) ^' The Sub Divisional Officer, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 7. The Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through : Its Secretary, Danganiyan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 8. The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) 9. The Junior Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Berla, Dist. Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 r-^-i:.; •^;-';^ p HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 23 of2005 PETITIONER : Sajjan Singh & Ofhere. RE.SPONDE^TS WRSUS : State ofClihattisgarh & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER AR'nCLE 226,/227_QF THE CONSTITimON OF INDIA SB: Hon'bie Shri Satisli K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhvr-ah*d, D^'. A.G. forthe State/respondent No.lto4and6. '<-, Shri Ravmdra Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.: Sl-c-i B.D.Gum, Advocate forthe respondeiit No. 7 to 9. ^. (Passsd on 21sl day of July, 2010) 1. LeaiTied counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instnictions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become uifructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvei-t the above subniission. la view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infmctuous. Interini relief gi-anted on 17.01.2005 is vacated. Sd/- _ . , SatishK.Agnib"t" Jud&e Amit r