IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 16TH OCTOBER 2009 / 24TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 25798 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.SEEMAMOL, W/O.B.VINOD,BAHULEYAPURAM, THYKKATTUSSERY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,(REGISTER NO.127834). BY ADV. SRI.M.V.SOMARAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,PATTOM PALACE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLICSERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THYKKATTUSSERY VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA. ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC FOR R1,2,3 GP ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).25798/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 16th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed alleging that the petitioner has not been given adequate weightage marks by the Public Service Commission for nativity/residence certification in the course of selection to the post of last grade servants in Alapuzha District. An affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents 1, 2 and 3. Paragraph 2 of the same reads as follows. “It is most respectfully submitted that the petitioner Smt.Seemamol. C (Reg.No.127834) included in the Ranked List for the post of Last Grade Servants-Various Departments, Alappuzha District, published on 18.9.2009, assigning Rank No.1054, was given the grace mark of Nativity. Consequently her Rank has been reassigned as 401 A in the Ranked List as per Erratum notification of even number dated 22.8.2009. She will be considered for advice for appointment, as and when her turn, according to the revised rank, arises.” 2. Same is recorded. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.M.V.Somarajan and learned Standing Counsel for the PSC Mr.Alexander Thomas. W.P.(C).25798/09 2 3. No further direction is called for, in view of the stand taken by the respondents. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs