CWP (T) No. 7012 of 2008 17.9.2010 Present: Mr.Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Rathore, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record, certain documents including the noting portion of the file pertaining to the regularization of one Sohan Lal, who was junior to the petitioner, from which it is clear that petitioner’s case for regularization could not be considered in view of the pendency of the instant petition. 2. Learned counsel further submits that a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s case on merits. 3. Consequently, without going into the merits of the petition, a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner’s claim in entirety, including the claims set out in the present petition, in accordance with law. The decision be positively taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Needless to add, petitioner shall be afforded with an opportunity of hearing/representation, if required, and while deciding the authority shall assign reasons which shall be communicated to the petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Karol) 17th September, 2010 Judge. (C)