IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: November 11, 2011. Crl. Misc.No.M-23918 of 2011. Inderjeet ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate, for the petitioner, Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G. Haryana. M.M.S.BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of M (name concealed) prosecutrix. As per the statement of complainant it is alleged that the petitioner have intoxicated the prosecutrix and committed rape upon her after taking her to different places. Counsel for the petitioner has vehemently opposed the story of the prosecutrix. The petitioner has been in custody for the last one year and eleven months. His claim is that the prosecutrix is intentionally avoiding appearance in this case before the trial Court. There are allegations against the petitioner for having committed rape upon the prosecutrix either by intoxicating her or by threatening her at the knife point. No ground is made out to grant the concession of regular bail. Dismissed. However, it is ordered that in case the prosecutrix is not examined within a period of 6 months it will be open to the petitioner to approach this Court again for regular bail. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE November 11th, 2011 tarun sahni