5' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl No. ^^ /2011 PETITIONER ->^^F^:. ..'!•' .-•••" .;^€^-v<^' ^.-""" /Y^ iS.***" RESPONDENTS: ^gt^v \ ' •awy^'1. • ^ !; fanendra Kumar Patel S/o Shri Ahibal Ram Patel about 54 Years occupation Head Master, Middle School Chhata Path, Block Kartala Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, 2. Coramissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba DistrictKorba (C.G.) WRIT UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PERTICULAR OF THEPETITIONERS: As per cause title. 2. PERTICULAR OF THE RESPONDENTS: As per cause title. ^\s ^o ~^si '<iww^, 'gF^qTT?, fadiyy ..t-O.f^'^o-^ai)}!^ •sn^i ~4ii tfnv wi ari^i grqN; j ¥RITWW?(T 3tl^3i SB : Hon'bie^hri Manindra Mohad Shrivastava. J 21-06-2011 Shri Ashwani Shukta, counsef Shri N.Naha Roy, Panel Lawt With the consent of tearned tinally. successfuily completing the prob4 ^NwiN •wre?-if-fet^7fsR5TC ^sifiTETsn^r for the petitioner. 'er for the State. ounsei for the parties, the matter is heard Fhe petitioner was appoirted on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After :ion period of 2 years, he was granted regularpayscale. i Learned counsei appearing| for the petitioner submits thst the issue invoived in the case is as to whettler, the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date ofj initial appointment or after completion of probation period. The issue involved herein State Administrative Tribunal, Jab^ jwas considered by the Madhya Pradesh iipur in O.A.No.2745/88 {Madhukant 'Y'adu antf 56 others v. State of M.P^ & others), wherein, it was held that the simiiariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie with efrect from the date of initial apDointment. !The matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court in special Leave i^etition (Civii) No.6892/93. The said petition 1 was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court, uphoiding the decision of ihe Tribunal to the effect that the T^achers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scaie from the date of of Chhattisgarh & Oftera [W.P.fS initial appointment. Learned counset appearinli for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the sam^ issue in Amar Sai Ram & Oihers v. State No.4725/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, ';pl»ri,M(,;.5FT!i?;W.-!.S,:-: ;2CI 1—1.50,000. ^l 3D^t W W 3?1^?T gn^ien UBypil ^sf '^WM'!i, •ST^WI'C, wwwy. .^J..<A:?..:..^.li.Ui sn^T1'pw (' p) aitowed the petnioners to make a raising all their grievances. Aceordingly, the petitioner i^ raising ali his grievances, in the iigh^ 27/12/2008, and in turn, the oono^rned representation, ifany, in accordancej t'nree months from the date of recei[{ or tne racts. In view ofthe foregoing, this rtetition is disposed of. ^ii^PiN WRff 'if fs%t tr^it^K ^•iiRitsff^f representation within a period of ten days; granted iiberty to make a representation of the aforesaid judgment and oircuiar dated 'rned respondent is direoted to deoide the with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of t of the representation, subject to verification indsa r'nrivas ^otian5>nl siava jud^