IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2009 / 10TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2737 of 2009(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- G.O.JACOB, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.LATE OUSEPH, NAJALIAN HOUSE, KALADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ALUVA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.2737 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 calling upon him to pay the amount mentioned therein towards the advertisement fee. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the communication was issued at a time when he applied for a fitness certificate for his vehicle. Petitioner submits that there is no justification in issuing Ext.P3 and therefore he has filed Ext.P4 to the respondent disputing his liability to pay the amount. In this writ Petition, all that the petitioner seeks is a direction to the respondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P4. The petitioner having raised serious dispute regarding his liability to pay the Advertisement fee, it is only appropriate that his contentions are duly adverted to and a final WP(c).No.2737/09 /2/ decision is take in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider Ext.P3 in the light of Ext.P4 and pass orders there on. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/