1 S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.150/2004 LRs of Dhanna Ram and ors. vs. Parmesh Chandra and ors. DATE OF ORDER ::: 8.2.2006 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. AK Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. NM Lodha, AAG, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. According to the petitioner himself, the petitioner has not been dispossessed from the land in question for which the interim order was passed by this Court on 4.10.2001. Because of this statement only, the contempt petition appears to have been filed absolutely frivolous and without there being any basis because by order dated 4.10.2001, the respondents were restrained from dispossessing the petitioner. When the petitioner has not been dispossessed, what for the petitioner has filed this contempt petition remained unexplained. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents may construct a wall in the field for which the Court has passed on 4.10.2001 itself 2 shows that the petitioner without there being any violation of the order of this Court, has filed the present contempt petition. In view of the above, this contempt petition, having no merit, is hereby dismissed and the notices are discharged. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya