1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT J O D H P U R ::: ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3718/2009 Jagga Ram & ors v. State of Rajasthan ::: Date of Order: 23rd July, 2009 ::: P R E S E N T HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr M.K. Garg, for the petitioner Mr Ashok Prajapat, Public Prosecutor for the State ::: By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the relevant material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that two FIRs, No.116/2009 & 118/2009, were registered against the accused-party whereas FIRs No.113/2009 & 115/2009 were registered against the complainant-party. It is further contended that one Nava Ram belonging to the accused-party has died and sec.302, IPC has been added against the complainant- party in FIR No.115/2009; therefore, looking to all the facts and circumstances of the case, including that both the parties have registered cases against each other, both the parties have sustained injuries and one person belonging to accused-party has died, the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and 2 of 2 nothing is to be recovered or investigated from them; therefore, they may be released on bail. Above facts regarding registration of cases by both the parties against each other have not been disputed by learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of case diary of both the cross-cases, which were summoned by this Court. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it just and proper to release the accused-petitioners, namely, 1] Jagga Ram s/o Danaji, 2] Deva Ram s/o Danaji, 3] Kika Ram s/o Dungarji, 4] Teja Ram s/o Jagtaji, 5] Nava Ram s/o Pannaji, 6] Rawta Ram s/o Bhimaji, presently confined in District Jail, Sirohi on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in F.I.R. No.116/2009, Police Station- Sirohi, registered under Secs.452, 455, 436/149, IPC and sec.3 of PDPP Act, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. This bail application is allowed accordingly. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. mma