(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Family Court Appeal No. 27 of 2009 Yogesh s/o. Madhavrao Tak, Age : 32 years, Occupation : Labour, R/o. Nehru Nagar, .. Appellant Old Pedgaon Road, (Original Parbhani, Dist. Parbhani. respondent) versus Sau. Shital w/o. Yogesh Tak, Age : 27 years, Occupation : Business & Service, R/o. C/o. Suresh s/o. Pralhadrao Chintamani [Indurkar], In front of Gavkari Press, .. Respondent Khokadpura, Near Paithan Gate, (Original Aurangabad. petitioner) ....................... Mr. M.V. Ghatge, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. S.D. Hiwrekar, Advocate, for the respondent. ........................ (2) CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 23RD FEBRUARY 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per A.P. Deshpande, J.) : 1. This Family Court Appeal is filed by the husband, challenging an order passed by the Family Court directing payment of maintenance. 2. The parties to the appeal have resolved the dispute by entering into compromise, consequent upon which the parties are staying together. As the parties are residing together, the parties have agreed that they do not want to proceed with their claims in the court of law. A further statement is to be found in the joint affidavit, that they have relinquished all their past claims in view of the settlement. The joint affidavit is signed by both the parties and their Advocates. 3. The parties are present in the court. They admit the contents of joint affidavit to be true and correct. Both the Advocates and the parties request this court to dispose of the Family Court Appeal. (3) 4. In view of the joint affidavit filed by the parties, the Family Court Appeal stands disposed of. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( A.P. DESHPANDE ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/27fca