IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 26TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 23307 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ P.K. SURESH BABU, S/O. LATE P.K. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, VARMA TRAVELS, PADMAVILASAM ROAD, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.R.KIRAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. K. RAJEEV, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, RAJEEV NIAS, IRUMBA, ARUVIKKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.23307 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 2. Petitioner has approached this court feeling aggrieved by Ext.P7. Complaint is that it was against the direction contained in Ext.P6 judgment. 3. First respondent has filed a statement and Ext.R1(a) has been produced. By Ext.R1(a), the second respondent is found liable to pay a sum of Rs.1,64,160/- and ofcourse it is the case of the first respondent that proceedings will be taken against the petitioner only under Section 9(2) of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, if it is necessary. In the light of the statement, Ext.P7 cannot survive after the issuance of Ext.R1(a). In such circumstances, the writ petition is closed. Needless to say, Ext.P7 cannot be implemented in the light of Ext.R1(a). (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb