:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5749 OF 2007 Shri Dinesh Jain ...Petitioner Versus Mrs.Dolly Chaiwalla and Ors. ....Respondents Anil Subramaniam, Adv. for the petitioners. Mrs.Indrayani M.Koparkar Adv. for respondent no.5. Shri Nitin Deshpande for respondent no.1. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 23rd January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The impugned order is inter-locutory in nature and there can be no prejudice to the petitioner as he can assail this action if final order in the suit is adverse to him. While challenging that order :2: :2: :2: appropriate plea with regard to not referring documents to the hand writing expert can also be raised and that grievance, needless to state, can always be dealt with, on its own merits and in accordance with law. The impugned order being interlocutory there is no need to interfere with it at this stage. Petition is dismissed. sd/- ******