IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev.(T) No.: 23 of 2008. Decided on: 29.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Barfi Devi. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): I have gone through the judgment dated 5th September, 2007 rendered by the learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.(M) No.233 of 1996. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. The learned Tribunal has come to the right conclusion that the petition has been preferred after the period of limitation has expired. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 29, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?