HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENT8 Y)?ntPet]itionNo.269of:2tm 1. Diiia Nath Lahre S/o Shri Awadh Ram Labre, Aged about 39 years, R/'o village Kenapali, Tahsil Dhabhara, District Janjgir Chanipa (CG). 2. Sanjay Kiuiiar Sidar S/o Mehar Ram Sidar, aged about 31 years, R/o village Shaakarpali, Tahsil Dhabhara, District Janjgir Champa (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Clihattisgarh, Tlwough: Secretary, Department of village Panchayat and Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector; District Raigai'h (CG). 3. Ciiief Executive QfBcer, Janpad Paiichayat Baramkela, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). 4. Jaipad Panchayat, Baraiiikela, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigam (CG). (WRFT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjHON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Binu Shanna, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 & 2. Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate for the respondent No. 3 & 4. ?, 4. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners subinits tfiat tlie petitioiiers are aggrieved by non-appointaient of the petitioners after selection on the post ofShikshakamii Class-III. He fiirther subniits that he is not questiomng validity ofany particular order. Be that as it may, there is avai!abi!ity of statutory appeal under rule 12 ofRule 1997 and nsle 13 ofRules 2007. The petitioners, without approaching the appellate authority wfaich is provided under statute, have approached to this Court. Thus, petition is dismissed as not mamtainable. However, a liberty is reseryed to tlie petitioners to take reeourse to other statutory fonim tliat may be available to him, under the provisions oflaw. Consequently, M.(W)P Nos. 231/06 and 2230/06, appiications for graiit ofad-iiiterim reliefstands disposed of. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge