IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1358 of 2006 UCO BANK (FORMERLY UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK) Versus SUSHIL KUMAR KHEMKA ----------- 2 4.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. Yet again, it is another unfortunate case where the filing of civil revision could have been better avoided by the UCO Bank. All that the Court below had done that it had allowed the amendment in the plaint filed by the plaintiff, opposite party seeking eviction of the Bank who is said to be the tenant. One fails to understand as to what objection the UCO Bank could have against such amendment specially when all that was said to be incorporated by way of amendment in the plaint was a subsequent event. It is absolutely clear that a frivolous civil revision application has been filed before this Court and therefore, this Court would dismiss the same with a cost of Rs. 5,000/-. Such cost will be paid by the defendant, Bank to the plaintiff within a period of one month from the date of production/receipt of a copy of this order. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)