^ IN SHE HIGH C8URS OF JUDICATUHB AT BILASPUR (G.G.) WRzr PETisiai NO. 23-9 g o? 2001 BEIWEEN 1. ant. Gulab Pandey Widow of Late Shri. Vidhyaotoar Pandey, aged aboiit 55 years, Residen-fc of Murarka Marke-b, Korba (ChhatUsgarh). 2. Rajendra Prasad Eandey §/o Late Shri Viahyadhar Pandey, aged about 35 years, Resident of Murarka Market, Korba (ehhattlsgarh). ^.o' ^•^- O<<S"IA •• ''i^~ \0^..--^WP ^^ LV\^' l.\--' •SE'rCTieNERS .^ fl N B 1. 2. 3. Chha'ttisgarh state EXectricity Board, ihrough its seere'tary» Eaganiya, Baipur, (Chhattisgarh). Vidhyut Grih Vi<3hyalay EEabandhan sami.ti Korba» 'Hirough its Seeretary/Eicecutlve Etigj.neer Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Korba. Englneer, e^.E.B. Korba East. SPONBENTS WRIT PETITXON UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OS- THE GONSTITUTION OF INDffi tli l l (" T ./ XI-HC—78 an^i'wf?;iw OTI BII^T ANi'ti ^5E[ l>^||qi<'i<l, yal-M'IS, fa|<r)l«y,< itWWl (h*lt<sh an^i'q^T (>i?(3°"i?) 200| ^raiw ^ifef 3iit?i • tZfWSf'S&'S •Sf- ftflf'O- .ffJV!.fTirrlW '&Of-T'^ "S.tJPlf .S&LfEf Wi.K^ tj U O 1 i'LrIlt £•F^S. 1 ^ 27.08.2010 Shri R.R.Sinha, counsel fort] Shri Ashish- Shrivastava, couj Shri V.RiTiwan, counsei forr| Grievance of the petitioners N0.1 'Sate yidhyadhar Pande^r was was working as Principai with the harness in the year 1996 during i| reti'ral dues ha.ve not been paid to ttt have not considered the case compassionate appointment. Counsel for the petitioners sl to withdraw this oetition. He how4 would be served,- if the Detitionf representation and the concemed the case in accordance with law. Counsel for the 'resoondenl representation filed by the petition| accordance with iaw. Accordingly, the petitioners petition with liberty to file represeiji and in tum the resoondents are exij further oeriod ofthree months. It is made clear that this CoiJ on the merits of the case and the d decide the representation of the peti) With'the above observaticn, tl |ie petitioners. [ise' for respondents 1 & 3. ^spondent N0.2. tre that husband of the oetitioner 'blllct'fl-f ^FWif »fft^t <fa<(l< ^Tsifinsii^i an empioyee of respondents and respondent N0.2 and he died in lis employment. However, ali the ;em and similarly the respondents of the respondent N0.2 fcr .-ibmits that he mav be permitted :ver submits that ends of justice srs are percrutted to file fresh ?.uthorities a.re directed to decide |s very fairiy submits that any pr would be decided promptly in are pennitted t.o withdraw this itation within a oeriod of month lected to decide the sanie within a [rt has not expressed aiiy opmion loncemed authority is directed to '.ioner m aocordan.ee with law. petition stands disposed pf. ^r Sd/- PritmkerDiwakar Judge i—^ 1..—.: