IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1092 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2007 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER, WORKS DIVISION XIV (NH), P.W.D, FATORDA, MARGAO AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. SAWAIVIR SADASSIVA RAJENDRA BASSAVALING RAJE WADIYAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. A. Kamath, Additional Government Advocate for the applicants. Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:- 22nd December, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. A. Kamath, learned Additional Government Advocate for the applicants and Mr. R. G. Ramani, learned Advocate for the respondents. 2. This is an application for speaking to the minutes. According to the applicants in para 16(A) of the Judgment dated 29.7.2010 passed in First Appeal No. 267/2007 instead of survey no.185/34 it has been wrongly mentioned as survey no. 184/34 and as such necessary correction deserves to be carried out in the judgment. 3. Mr. Ramani, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents fairly concedes that inadvertent error has occurred in para 16(A). Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary corrections to be carried out in para 16(A) of the Judgment. A. P. LAVANDE, J. U. V. BAKRE, J. vn