N IE HIGH COUR OF JUDXCATURE CHHATTISGARH A ILASPU “C 0116I7‘ [[2004 RIMINAL REVISION N pplcan Aits ra raar nla ‘ Llwam ball Mahasamund a 1. Pmod Chandk Sfo Sewal ’ Chandmkar Aged about 2? y ahaSamund C G M ( ) Vd Chdk Sf lk/ mo anraar o Sewana hanm‘kar, e aout Sea‘rs a a3amun Dist aasamund C G oss anraar x’o Gira ‘hanti'ar e» aout 19 a‘rs alw§n ii asa’mum, I m anaa o ra anraar e aout 26 ams R —%par nasau n, aasamun ers an-Alica Nppnt S f Chhth h le tate 0 atsxgar Throug Poic CRMINA REON U 397 R _ ;L VISI . I 'H T T BR \ ‘Cd' Agd b %"y Rl‘ ‘ ( Lalwni Gali Mahd ' Mh { ) Lkh Chdk S j , ‘ Li Cfak G’a Agd Mahi b yé Dgstu ‘ B. : M ahasamund-(C .;G.) Chudaam Chdrkr Sf Phlad ‘ Chdk Agd b y /o a Mhmnd ..... P SMahasamud Dist Mhd ‘ (CG) KVus XI—HC 78 31m? W (Wm mmm wa‘ré‘am mwm WW Wm $aifmazm’r it»! my 21 .1 2.2004: - Heard Miss Pritha Ghoshal, cou nsel for ihe accused/applicants and Shri P.Bharat, P.L. for the State/respondent. The applicants being aggrieved by the ordet of the lower Court dated 20.09.2004 framing the charge against them under Section 307 of the Indian PenaLCode have tiled this revision petition. This Court perused the materiais available on recordg. Learned counsel appearing for the accused/applicants contended that there are no evidence to show tha the applicants committed an offence punishable under Section 307 of the I Edian Penal Code and that the trial Court can proceed for an alleged offence und r Section 324 read with 34 oi the l.P.C. ow, the triai is pending before he lower Court. It is only proper that this Counys not expressed any opinio ‘on the] may; case t: gt u. the prosecution. The Supreme Court has repeatedly pointe out that the Courts have to examine tile— ‘e aw?) 1AA...“ testimonies of the witnesses and to rd finding _ M 9 courseis to remove the chaff from the rain. The trial Court shall appreciate the evidence of the witnesses and tind out hether the prosecution has made out a case and if so punishable under what eotion. l find that the trial Court v¢s ke n to give unnecessary importance to the . Unless the contents of the publication news Regs girhlai‘sged in the newspape are proved the news items in the vario s newspapers cannot be relied on. In the interest of justice, thi Courtris of the view that the trial is conducted by the First Additional S sions Judge, Mahasamund. Learned Distfict & Sessions Judge, Raipur shall pass a suitable orderghigegar: a 8d]. CHIEF JUSTICE " The revision petition is dispose of accordinglyn‘; o