Kambli 1 wp(L)2344.10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2344 OF 2010 ... Rahul Jayant Tiwari ...Petitioner v/s. The Director, Thakur Institute of Management Studies Career Devep. & Research & ors. ...Respondents ... Petitioner in person. Ms.Sebastiana Alemao for Respondent No.1. Ms.Smita Gaidhani for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATED: 26TH OCTOBER,2010 P.C.: 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. Admittedly the Petitioner was Kambli 2 wp(L)2344.10 admitted to the course, subject to passing final B.Sc. Examination. The result of the Petitioner was wrongly declared as “failed”. But, now the result has admittedly been corrected. The Respondent No.3 has no objection to accept the name of the Petitioner, as the Petitioner is now duly qualified for the admission. 3. As the Petitioner’s wrong result was declared by the University, the Petitioner, who was student, can by no stretch of imagination be penalised. In our opinion, therefore, following order would meet the ends of justice. O R D E R (i)Rule in the petition is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). Kambli 3 wp(L)2344.10 (ii)If for regularising the admission of the Petitioner the Respondent No.1 has to create an additional seat, additional seat be created and the Respondent No.3 shall sanction that additional seat as a special case. (iii)Petition disposed of. No order as to costs. (D.K.Deshmukh,J.) (N.D.Deshpande, J.)