IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3955 of 2010 SOMAR GOPE @ SOMAR YADAV, SON OF LATE SEODHARI GOPE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – GULARIA CHAKI, P.O.- AIRODRAM, P.S.- MAGHAD MEDICAL, DISTRICT – GAYA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER –CUM- CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT BOARD GAYA, DISTRICT - GAYA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GAYA, DISTRICT – GAYA. 4. THE CHIARMAN, DISTRICT BOARD GAYA, DISTRICT – GAYA. ----------- 02. 08.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that petitioner retired from the post of Gardener on 31st of December 1994 from the service of the respondent – District – Board. However, some of the retiral dues have been paid save and except, the amount towards leave encashment and gratuity. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Board submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the 2 respondent no.2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the representation of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest, if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)