(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.262 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.221 OF 2008. Govind Baban Narute. .. Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent. .... Mr.V.V. Purwant, Adv. for Applicant. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, APP for Respondent. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 26th June, 2008. DATED : 26th June, 2008. DATED : 26th June, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under section 376 & 506 of I.P.C. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the applicant had committed rape on his sister-in-law. The medical evidence shows that there are number (2) of injuries on the body of the prosecutrix. The said injuries are on the lips, cheeks, waist, thighs, etc. Looking to the nature of the injuries, they could not be said to be self-inflicted. 4. Looking to the medical certificate and the evidence of the prosecutrix, I am not inclined to grant bail. Hence, application is rejected. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application after 6 months. 4. The application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)