IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.682 of 2006 SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 27.8.2008. N.H./ In spite of repeated calls today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on different dates. This revision has been preferred against the order of maintenance passed by Principal Judge, Rohtas thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.1,000/- to the opposite party no.2. The learned counsel for the opposite party submits that not a penny has been given to the opposite party no.2 in spite of order passed by the Principal Judge. It is further submitted that now petitioner has got no interest in the case and, therefore, he is not appearing since last several days. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, this revision is dismissed. The court below is directed to take steps for payment of maintenance to the opposite party no.2 in accordance with law. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )