IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1307 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 1307 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 1307 OF 2006 Suhita S. Shivangi ] .. Petitioner Versus Air India Limited ] .. Respondent Mr. M.B. Singh for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Saluja i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for the respondents. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: 23RD JANUARY, 2007 P.C. : . We heard Mr. Mohan Bir Singh, the counsel for the petitioner. The thrust of his argument is that large number of Air hostesses who were grounded for medical reasons were given the same grade while in the petitioner’s case her grade has been lowered and salary has been reduced. He referred to the averments made in paragraphs 8 and 16. 2. The argument does not impress us. The petitioner does not dispute that upon her being grounded for medical reasons, her employment in ground staff did : 2 : not result in reduction in salary or grade. It was only after the petitioner proceeded on annuity and she expressed her willingness to accept the job of ground staff and at that time her grade has been reduced. All the cases cited by the petitioner relate to the assignment of duties prior to proceeding on annuity and not thereafter. 3. No case for discrimination is made out. 4. Writ Petition does not deserve to be admitted. It is dismissed in limine. Sd/- [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] [R.M. LODHA, J.] Sd/- [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]