IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2009 / 30TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23792 of 2009(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.K.PANKAJAKSHAN,S/O.KRISHNAN, UDAYAMPARAMBIL,CHMPUPARAMBU.P.O, VIA. CHAMPAKULAM, DIST.ALAPUZHA(EX-MANAGING DIRECTOR,ALLEPPEY DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL-LTD.NO.A-816,AHARA BUILDING,ALLEPPEY. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL),ALAPPUZHA. 2. PART TIME ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ALLEPPEY CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL NO. A-816,AHARA BUILDING, ALAPPUZHA,OFFICE INSPECTOR,OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(GENERAL)OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, AMBALAPUZHA. 3. ALLEPPEY DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE HOSPITAL LTD.NO.A-816,AHARA BUILDING,ALLEPPEY-1 REP; BY ITS PART TIME ADMINSTRATOR,OFFICE INSPECTOR,OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,AMBALAPUZHA. MS.A.G.ANEETHA, SLP. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.23792 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T What is sought for in this writ petition is to stop the authorities from conducting election to the Board of Directors of the 3rd respondent Society. 2. Admittedly, an Administrative Committee is in office. The appointment of the Administrative Committee is upheld by this Court in Ext.P5 judgment dated 07/04/2008 in WP(C) No.11706/2008. That judgment was confirmed in Writ Appeal No.1291/2008, a copy of which is Ext.P6. According to the petitioner, they have filed an SLP against Ext.P6 judgment in the Supreme Court, as SLP No. 28638/2008, and the matter is pending without any interim order. It is stated that in the meanwhile, election to the Board of Directors is scheduled. The learned counsel contends that now that the Apex Court is ceased of the matter, the respondents would be stopped proceeding further with the election that is scheduled. WP(C) No.23792/2009 -2 3. In my view, this Court will not be justified in passing an order as sought for. If at all, the petitioner has to seek any order as now sought for, the Forum before which the same can be sought for, is the Apex Court itself by moving for an interlocutory order, and not this Court. For that reason, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition fails, and is accordingly dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg