/ ingle enc IN THE HIGH CORT U OF CHHA TISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ P ts} No gglwo ‘PETITR " Sh W/ A‘ ‘f IONE arma o mlt agd b 32 ys e aout ear Med1cal Store, In s11 fce Tah ofl Pendra , R i riot Bilaspur C.G. ' oad; Ds ’ , 1 / te: . V '5-3iSta ‘RESPONDENTS ’ CG thgh the L. rou Sty L a gile ecrear aw nd Lesatur Dpnt, \DKS Bhawan eartme ‘ Ripr au 2 High Cur f Chhti, , / ot o atsgarh thh the gi Geal, roug : Restrar‘ enr Bllaspur C 3 /The Cout f Chhttig Bp r o asarh, ilasur R G Hgh eglstrar eneral i CG. I ' OML Sl Bh ‘ f w n 0 ISSUE OF AN 3Q 44.4;; ’ ;;m A u I HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ) S.B: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (S) No. 3232/2011 PETITIONER : Smt. Smriti Shanna Versus RESPONDENTS : State of C.G. and others < Appearance: x ? Shri Dashrath Prajapati, counsel for the petitioner. E Shri G.D. Vaswani, GoVernment AdvOcate for the State. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (24.06.2011) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties the petition is heard finally. (2) 3 In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, who is a reserved category candidate has challenged action of concerned respondent and consequent issuance of list of ‘ ineligible candidates, wherein she has been declared ineligible for appearing in the Civil Judge (Entry Level) Preliminary Examination, 20H to be held on'26/06/20l 1. (3) Admittedly, the petitioner’s candidature has been rejected on account of non-submission of caste certificate along with her s , application. I (4) According to the4petitioner, on a proper reading of the contents 1 /,, of advertisementsubmission of caste certificate at the stage of ‘ x \_ ~. ‘ K “a, x > ’ ‘ I L ‘ \ x \ > preliminary examination was not required,.:therefore rejection of her candidature is illegal. I v I (5) i On the other hand, learned counsel ii‘or the respondent would argue that the terms of advertisement together with the instructions to candidates clearly provide that when some kind of relaxation in feé or otherwise is claimed, submission of certificate was necessary. W (6) i This court has already dealt with this issue in Writ Petition (S) I No. 3084/2011 (LalitiJangd'e‘Vs. High Court of Chhattisgarh) wherein it has been held by this court that in the absence of submission of caste certificate by a reserved category candidate, the candidature was rightly rejected. (7) . The order passed in the case of’Lalit Jangde (supra) shall govern the instant petition also. . (8). Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (9) A copy of the order passed in Writ Petition (S) N0. 3084/2011 .w be kept in the record ofthis me. Prasham kumar Mishra ' Judge L...