1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12145 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : B.R. GAVAI,J. DATE : 17th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, on the question of vacating interim relief. 2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that the licence, which is granted in favour of the petitioner, was, in fact, originally granted in the name of his father and it is illegally renewed in the name of the present petitioner. 3. The contention raised by the learned counsel for the applicant is totally contrary to what has been found by the Division Bench of this court in W.P. No. 5553/2007, vide order dated 24th February, 2009. 4. The Division Bench has, in unequivocal terms, held that the allegations in this respect were unsubstantiated from the record. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for vacating the interim relief. The application is rejected. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] grt/- 2