IN THE HIGH GOURT OF CEHATTI§GARH AT BILASPUR j, i“ w.P.No. 3279 [2003 PETITIONER : Prahlad Ram Knn‘am, Sf o Dan Singh, Agé’d about 36 years, Working as Chief Municipal O cer, W g Kondagaox: Hagar ,Palika, Baxter (C.G.). / Distt. Easter (C.G.). ~Vemua — 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, E$PONDENTS 3"...”— Department Vikas Vibhag, of Mantralaya, Paryawaran D.K.S. Awam Bhawan, Nagriya x _ ‘ Raipur (0.6.). ‘x0 ggggvnder Secretary, Department af Paryawaran Awam Nagriya Vilma Vib , Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raiyur (C.G.). . Nagar Palika Parishad, Kondagaon (Easter) though President, Hagar Palika Paxishad, Koudagaom District— Easter (C.G.). 20F INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A BUITéBLE ET, ORDER OR bums-non l To Do Jus'ncE m ran mnnm. ‘ E I 3 XI-HC—22 Shri Sanjuy K. Agrawal, Depuiy Advoca’re Genera! fakes nofice for responden‘rs 1 and 2 3y fhqs pe'h’non filed under Ar'h les 226/227 0f The ConsTI'ru‘l'Ioa af he pe'h‘honer has challeng d The order d§ed 30-9 2003 Annexure- 13 whereby The pefmoner' has been Transferred from Nagar PaHka Parishad, Kondagaon 1'0 Saraipaii, is‘rric‘r Mahasamund. The pe‘rifioner is working as Ch ef Municipal Officer, ai Kondagaon since 27-3-2001 and if has been m ni‘ioned in ‘ihe pefiiion Thai The pe‘i‘i‘iioner is working Ta The saTisfacT-ibn of ail The concerned auThoriTies. The Transfer of The peTiTioner is conTrory To The Transfer policy. The moTher of The peTiTioner is seriousiyiil and she is Taking TreaTmenT aT E Kchdagaon hcspii-al. The peTiTioner'si niece is sfudying in ciass VTh ai' Kondagaon High Schooi. I have heard The learned counse for The parTies. Learned counsel for The peTiTio oer submiTs ThaT The moTher of The peTiTioner is seriously ill and she is Taking TreoTm'enT aT Kondagoon hospiTal and iT is noT possible for him To shiTT hs moTher To The Saraipali, Therefore, The peTiTioner may be allowed To nake a deTailed represenTaTion To respondenT No.1 raising all his grievames To which The learned counsel for respondam‘s 1 and 2 has no objecfion. W3 5hri Prashanf Jaiswal, counsel fov fhe pefi‘rioner. } India, HtsW X1-HC—22 mmawfa Havingrheér‘d The learned counsel. rfhe facfs and cirbumsfances of fhe case defailed represen‘ra‘rion raising al! his wifhin a period af 10 days from foday decide ‘i'he represen‘ra‘rion of The peTifioi ? i L ’ Parfies are en‘l'ifled for cer‘rified i / ;¢;: ' arder in on objecTive manner.’ and direcTions, This wriT peTiTion is for The par‘ries and having regard To , fhe pefifioner is aliowed 1'0 make o grievances To The respondent no.1 and in Turn, respondenT no. 1 wiil ner wiThin a period of >30 days from The doTe of receipT of The represenTaTion considering aiE“The grievances of. fhe pefifianer‘ and shul/l pass a reasoned If The peTiTioner is noT relieved Then he may be ollowed To canTinue in presenT piece of posTing Tili The represenToTion is decided. With The dfor‘esaid abservufions disposed of. i ConsequenTiy, M.(W.)P. No. 298972003 and I.A. No. 9611/2QO3 also ‘s‘rand disposed of. copy of This order. I M / Sdl L.c.BHADo° Judge #77 \ mr {@W