IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 15.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.46718 of 2006(T) (OA No.5778 of 1999) A.Manzoor Ali ... Applicant -Vs.- Director General of Police, Chennai-4. ... Respondents Original Application No.5778 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to issue a direction directing the respondent to include the applicant's name in the "C" list of Sub Inspectors of Police (cat-1) fit for promotion as Inspectors of Police (cat-1) for the year 1999-2000 drawn in Rc.No.129130/NGB I(1)/99 dated 12.8.99 in the appropriate place with due seniority and consequently direct the respondent to promote the applicant as Inspector of Police from the date of promotion of his immediate junior with all consequential monetary and service benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.S.Ravi For respondent : Mr.B.Vijay Government Advocate. O R D E R Original Application No.5778 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to issue a direction directing the respondent to include the applicant's name in the "C" list of Sub Inspectors of Police (cat-1) fit for promotion as Inspectors of Police (cat-1) for the year 1999-2000 drawn in Rc.No.129130/NGB I(1)/99 dated 12.8.99 in the appropriate place with due seniority and consequently direct the respondent to promote the applicant as Inspector of Police from the date of promotion of his immediate junior with all consequential monetary https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and service benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. 41 years old Sub Inspector of Police, who was suffered a minor punishment of reduction in time scale of pay for one year without cumulative effect in respect of the charges framed under Rule 3(b) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, seeks the relief as above. At the relevant point of time, the punishment was in force. Therefore, his name was not considered to be included in the panel for promotion and that is in accordance with the clause 4 of G.O.Ms.No.368 Personal and Administrative Reforms Department dated 18.10.1983. 3. In such view of the matter, petitioner cannot have any grievance for non-inclusion of his name in the 'C' list at the relevant time, therefore, his request has been rightly rejected. Insofar as any service benefit that will accrue to the petitioner after lapse of the period of minor punishment, the petitioner is entitled to make a representation to the appropriate authority and the same shall be considered and disposed off on merits and in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is ordered as above. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar ts To Director General of Police, Chennai-4. +1cc to Govt.Pleader Sr 10255 +1cc to Mr.S.Ravi, Advocate Sr 9907 RSY(CO) km/1.3. W.P.No.46718 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/