IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3411 of 2010 1. PRAMOD KUMAR S/O SHRI NAGESHWAR SINGH R/O VILL.- DAULATPUR GANDHI TOLA, P.S. GAURICHAK, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY (HOME) POLICE DEPTT., OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA 5. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE HUMAN RIGHTS, BIHAR, PATNA 6. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CUM CHAIRMAN, PATNA RAIL POLICE SELECTION BOARD, PATNA 7. CITY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA 8. SUPERINTENDENT OF RAIL POLICE, PATNA ----------- 2. 13.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The issue relates to grant of five additional marks based on the NCCB certificate for selection on the post of Constable. Strong reliance has been placed on an order of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 16285 of 2007, affirmed in L.P.A. No. 821 of 2008 and analogous cases. Counsel for the State very fairly submits that if the petitioner was similarly situated on facts, he is entitled to the same treatment. The application is disposed in terms of the aforesaid orders of this Court for examination of the claims of the petitioner for similarity on facts and a reasoned and speaking order be passed within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the respondent no. 3 proposes to hold that the petitioner is not similarly situated, they are required to disclose the reasons to him, grant him a personal hearing and then pass a reasoned and speaking order on the issue of distinction to facilitate judicial review, should the need arise. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)