IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39506 of 2010 NATHUNI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner, if really, entered informant’s house, his intention was to have sexual relation with her, towards it he started to remove her cloths, but alarm was raised and he left the place, allegedly after leaving his mobile phone and torn cloths. It means to say that he did not succeed to perform the object for which he had entered. It is specifically submitted that mobile was taken by informant’s children. To justify the same only, this allegation is leveled. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bhangaha P.S. Case No. 24 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj (Mandhata Singh, J.)