IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1389 of 2010 RAM SAGAR PURI SON OF LATE CHHATU PURI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 20, 22 and 23 of the N.D.P.S. Act. The petitioner’s prayer for bail was earlier rejected by an order dated 29.4.2009 vide Cr.Misc.No.8480 of 2009. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2008 and two seizure list witnesses examined during trial have not supported the factum of seizure from the possession of the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, East Champaran in connection with N.D.P.S. case No.99 of 2008 arising out of Pakridayal P.S.case No.64 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to - 2 - initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )