IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No 6274 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- S BALAGURUNATHAM SR.MANAGER Versus KAMLESH KANAIYALAL THAKKAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr AH Mehta for the petitioner MR AM PAREKH for Respondent No. 1 Mr MA Bukhari, APP for Respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR Date of decision: 11/02/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr AM Parekh, learned Advocate waives notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1. Mr M A Bukhari, learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Non-Applicant-Kamlesh K Thakkar was granted Anticipatory Bail by the order of this Court. It is pointed out that he left the country and went to Dubai in breach of the conditions of the order of this Court. This fact is not disputed by the non-applicant. However, it is submitted that the passport has been taken in possession by the P.S.I., in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 26.12.1996. Though this Court take a serious view of the breach of the conditions of the bail order, in view of the assurance given by the learned Advocate for the respondent, it is not considered for going to the question of cancellation of the bail. In view of the aforesaid, this Criminal Misc.Application is dismissed. Rule discharged. ....