IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 13623 of 2009 Between: M.Raju S/o.M.Ratnam E.No.119761, R/o.Madharam Mines, Khammam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, rep.by its Director (Personnel), Visakhapatnam 2 The General Manager (Mines )cum Appellate Authority Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam 3 The Deputy General Manager(Mines) - HQ & Disciplinary Authority, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records from the Respondents and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of Respondents in not disposing of the petitioner of Appeal preferred against the suspension order issued by the 3rd respondent and further declare that the Suspension order issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings No. PL/EE(119761/09/134 dated 15.34.2009 as illegal, unjust contrary to law, arbitrary, discriminatory, without jurisdiction in violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles, 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and grant all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.V.RAVINDER RAO The Court at the stage of admission made the following O R D E R: Though this Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of suspension, but however, before it could reach for hearing, it had ended happily. The writ petitioner has since been reinstated back to his service, on the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, upon instructions, that the Appellate Authority found merit in his submissions to reinstate him back to the service though the organization is looking into the grave allegations made both against the writ petitioner and the allegations lodged by the writ petitioner against some one. The Writ Petition is, therefore, not necessary to be entertained. Hence, it is dismissed. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 19th July 2009 ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}