1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8148 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 8148 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 8148 OF 2005 Shaikh Jaibunnissa Abdul Latif and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar with Mrs. Nirmala K. Bhosale for Petitioner. Ms. M.P. Thakkar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1. Mr. P.V. Nichani for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & MRS R.S. DALVI.JJ. MRS R.S. DALVI.JJ. MRS R.S. DALVI.JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2005 DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2005 DATED : DECEMBER 01, 2005 P.C. . According to Petitioners themselves, S.R.A. scheme is sanctioned for final plot No. 141 which is original plot No. 242. It is their further case that their structure stand on final Plot No. 180 which is original plot No. 204. Earlier notice had been issued to other respondents who had their structures on final plot No. 180. The S.L.P. filed was dismissed and they were directed to give an undertaking that they would vacate the final plot. Considering that the scheme is in 2 respect of the final Plot No. 141, there is no cause in so far as the present petitioners are concerned, at least not, by invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this court. Hence, no interference is called for. Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (MRS. R.S. DALVI,J.) (MRS. R.S. DALVI,J.) (MRS. R.S. DALVI,J.)