IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5816 of 2009 Between: Bollina Rudramma. … Petitioner And Gunnam Venkata Rao and another. … Respondents This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5816 OF 2009 ORDER:- After the defendants’ side evidence is closed, at the request of the plaintiff, to give an opportunity to adduce rebuttal evidence, the suit was posted for adducing the rebuttal evidence of the plaintiff. On that plaintiff filed the impugned I.A.No.539 of 2009 in O.S.No.512 of 2008 to send the Will, dated 01.02.2008 to Finger Prints Expert for comparison with the admitted documents, without filing any admitted thumb marks of late Gunnam Ammaji, who executed the Will. Therefore, the lower court rightly dismissed the I.A. holding that in the absence of any admitted thumb marks, expert cannot compare the disputed thumb marks. Further, the expert evidence is not conclusive and cannot outweigh the oral evidence adduced by the parties in proof of the Will. In view of the same, no infirmity is discernible with the order passed by the lower court warranting interference. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 18th December 2009 LMV