IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDCATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) CIVEL REVISION N0. /3/ OF 2005 Q.,, //PETITIONER: ^ RESPONDENT: /' L Mahesh Kumar Mishra S/o Shn Bihari Lal Mishra, ^ Aged about 24 years, resident of Village Nevsa, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspsur (CG). VERSUS / Smt. Mamta Mishra, aged about 20 years, Wife of Mahesh Kumar Mishra, through Shri Shrawan Kumar Tiwari, resident of Village Parsada ,Block Kota, District Bilaspur (CG). ta«(f [EMORANDUM OF CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION'115 QF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE h XI-HC-78 VJTTJ -«l«irt^,yrfl'(i<i<»,Rrti'i'iyt 1126 HWWWHV Y.^.o.-.j5l.^ 3n^9T 'WP (i^rfg^) sii^CTmR'ii* aaiTaiT^sTwira? g^ITW^TlStT SII^ST ?3.1 Shri Shailendra Dubey, counsej Heard. The appl'cant has "referred dated 29/07G004 passed by lllr° Addit) 24 ofthe Hindu Marriaae Aet. Hca/./ev^ to withdrav/ this application on the maintainab!e in view ofthe proviso to teid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court| csse of S.h*/ Shafas' Coop. Hoiisina • Leamed.counsel for theapplic; lile appropriate proceedings ava'lable !n view ofthe above. the instan ^A'ith liberty to fiie appropriate proceedir • Learned counse! for the apDli order annexedwith the revision petltior Ofiice is- direeted to retum tt fornishing attest'ed copy ofthe same. Certified copy as.per rule. ti>i<ifri41'i *fi*io>T^"lsi3 •tRit^ii; ^siRnan^CT forthe.applicant. his revision against the impugned order ana! District Judge, Bilaspur under SecSon !r, learned counse! for the applicant seeks iround that the instant revision is not iection 115 ofCPC and in via"/ ofthe 'ISM' in the case of Surya Qews Rai Vs. Ram Vo' S SCC 675 ss wsff as fn tte SocieSif. Vs. Swasaj int prays that he may be granted ISberty to inder the law. t revision is dismissed as not malntainable igs avallable under the iaw. ant fijrther prays that the certified oopy of e certliied copy of the impugned order o the counse! for the aDSlicant on his Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge