IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2008 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7438 of 2008(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. SAJI.M.A., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.ESTHAPPAN, MADAN HOUSE, MERIGIRI P.O. 2. BIJU, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN, NELLADAN HOUSE, MERIGIRI.P.O. 3. BABU, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.DEVASSIKKUTTY, THIRUTHANATHIL HOUSE, MERIGIRI P.O. 4. SALI, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, KALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MERIGIRI P.O. 5. SHAJI, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.OUSEPH, THIRUTHANATHIL HOUSE, MERIGIRI P.O. 6. THANKACHAN, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAVARA, THOTTAKKARA HOUSE, MERIGIRI P.O. 7. POLACHAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.KURIAPPAN, KANJUKKARAN HOUSE, MERIGIRI P.O. 8. SINOJ, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, OORAKKATTU HOUSE, MERIGIRI.P.O. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE LOCAL ADMINISTRATOR, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MANJAPRA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE SECRETARY, MANJAPRA GRAMA PANCHAYATH. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANJAPRA VILLAGE OFFICE, MANJAPRA. 6. JOLLY THOMAS, PERUMAYAN HOUSE, KANJOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM. 7. M.V.DAVIS, MADAN HOUSE, MANJAPRA P.O., MARIGIRI. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 7438 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT I do not propose to go into the merits of the grounds raised or the genuineness of the grievance voiced. According to the petitioners, respondents 6 and 7 are now conducting a brick kiln within the area of the second respondent Manjapra Grama Panchayat in violation of the terms of the licence and the permit which had been granted to them by the District Collector. Ext.P2 complaint has been submitted by the petitioners before the third respondent. The third respondent will immediately take up Ext.P2, conduct necessary enquiries, issue notice to respondents 6 and 7, hear them as well as the petitioners and take appropriate action as warranted on Ext.P2 in the light of the above directions. The action initiated in the light of the above directions shall be completed by the Panchayat at the earliest and at any rate within one month of receiving a copy of this judgment. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.