-: 1 :- appp-365 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIM. APPL. NO. 365 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPL. NO. 2409 OF 2010 Milan Agrawal. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr. Ghansyam Upadhya i/b Law Juris for the applicant. Mr. D. R. More, APP. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : November 22, 2011. P. C. : 1. This application is taken out for restoration of Criminal Application No. 2409 of 2010. The said application was dismissed for default, however, it was restored by the order dated 15/04/2011 passed in Criminal Application No. 151 of 2011, subject to applicant’s depositing cost of Rs.2,000/- with the State Legal Aid Services Authority within two weeks. It was further observed in the said order that failing to deposit cost within the stipulated period, the said application should be deemed to have been rejected. The Applicant could not deposit the cost of Rs.2,000/- and therefore in view of the srp -: 2 :- appp-365 aforesaid order, Crim. Application No. 151 of 2011 has stood rejected. 2. In paragraph no.3 of the application, the applicant has given circumstances under which the cost could not be deposited within the stipulated period. I have gone through the said reasons, which I find to be satisfactory. 3. The presence of respondent no.2 may not be necessary for the disposal of present application as they had not put in their appearance in the main application, namely, Criminal Application No. 2409 of 2010. 4. Counsel for the applicant states that within 3 days from today, he will deposit the said cost with the State Legal Aid Services Authority. Statement is accepted. In view of the statement and for the reasons stated in paragraph nos. 2 & 3 the present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (RANJIT MORE, J.)