: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2007 Shri Pravinkumar Manikchand Pagariya & Ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Shri Gurulingappa Dagdappa Satbhai (D/H.) & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.R.A.Thorat for the Applicants. Mr.S.V.Pitre for Respondent Nos.1A to 1D. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2008 DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : After the matter had been remanded, additional evidence has been adduced by the Petitioner/landlord. The Appellate Bench has, with respect, analysed the entire evidence carefully and cogently. No interference whatsoever is warranted on the ground of bona-fide requirement. The ground under Section 13(1)(l) was given up by the Respondents. 2. The Respondents had established their bona-fide requirement in respect of the commercial premises on the ground floor. The mere fact that a small room was available at the back, does not militate against the case of bona-fide requirement. The Appellate : 2 : Bench has rightly held that business of electrical goods can conveniently be carried out from the shop having a road frontage and not from the premises facing the back. Further, the two premises which have been acquired by the Respondent are not at all convenient, one of them being below the stair-case. 3. As far as the residential premises are concerned also, the finding of bona-fide requirement cannot be faulted. The father has expired, one of the sons has expired. The remaining son is a mere daily wage earner. 4. Added to this, is the fact that it is also established that the Applicants have adequate other premises in their possession and occupation. The contention that the entire building is tenanted is unfounded. Firstly, no proceedings have been take to have the tenants evicted. Secondly, and more important, in one of the premises, business is being carried on by a firm of which the Applicant and his family members are partners. 5. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Application is dismissed. The time to vacate is extended upto 31.8.2008 subject to the Applicants : 3 : filing the usual undertaking within four weeks from today in this Court including that in the event of the Applicants not succeeding before the Supreme Court, they will comply with the decree including by handing over vacant possession of the premises. ***