IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 2832 of 2001 Between: Sri Veraha Naraimha Seva Sangham, Regd.NO. 349/81, Rep. by its President R. Demudu,S/o.Yerrana Simha Giri Colony, Saligrampuram, Visakhapatnam, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Endowments -- IV) Department, Secretariat Buildigns, Hyderabad,. 2 The Executive Officer, Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy, Devasthanam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the G.O.Ms.No.578 Revenue (Endowment__IV) Departmetn, dt. 19-8-2000 has no application to the petitioenr sangham and the same is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and consequently direct the respondents to register the land to an extent of Ac.4.00 cts in Survey No.275 of Advaivaram Village near Saligrampuram Visakhapatnam District in favour of the petitioner Society duly accepting the balance salw consideration and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.BADANA.BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.2832 of 2001 O R D E R: Sri Badana Bhaskara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the G.O. impugned in the writ petition has been superseded by subsequent G.O, the cause in the writ petition does not necessitate adjudication and that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 5th November, 2008. PNV