IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4807 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 26, 2009 Ravinder ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.R.K.Malik,Senior Advocate with Mr.P.K.Rohilla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied, if this writ petition is treated as a representation and respondent No.2 be directed to decide the same in view of the instructions (Annexure P-5) and judgments (Annexures P-9 & P-10). Respondent No.2, i.e. the Director General of Police, Haryana, Sector 6, Panchkula is directed to treat this writ petition as a representation and pass a speaking order after taking all aspects of the case of the petitioner and instructions (Annexure P-5) and judgments (Annexures P-9 & P-10) into consideration within a period of one month from the date of receiving of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 26, 2009 sunita