(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 4863 OF 2007 Vasant s/o. Anandrao Beedkar, Age : 75 years, Occupation : Pensioner, R/o. Patangan Galli, Shastriwada, Beed, Taluka & District : Beed. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32. 2. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Beed. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. Sanjay Mundhe, Advocate, for respondent no.2. ........................ (2) CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 COURT'S ORDER : 1. According to the petitioner, he possesses qualification of S.T.B.T. and hence he is claiming salary admissible to a trained Teacher under Government Resolution dated 19th September 1973. The petitioner has claimed that S.T.B.T. is equivalent to S.T.C. 2. The petitioner has not placed on record any document indicating equivalence of S.T.B.T. with S.T.C. In all fairness, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not possessed of any document which grants equivalence to S.T.B.T. with S.T.C. This being the position, there is no merit in the petition. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( A.P. DESHPANDE ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp4863