:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7111 OF 2007 Smt.Ashwini Ashok Narvekar ...Petitioners Versus The State of Mahrashtra and Ors. ....Respondents P.A.Pol for the petitioners. Ms.Cardozo, AGP for respondent no.1 & 3. M.V.Aiya for respondent no.4 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 4th 4th 4th December, 2007. December, 2007. December, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. There is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Controller of Rationing and the Minister while allotting the fair price shop to respondent no.4. Admittedly, the petitioner could not satisfy the requisite criteria including with regard to the financial capacity. This is a decision taken by the authorities consistent with the policies which have been framed for allotment of ration shops. There is no reason to interfere as the order is not challenged, as being vitiated by malafide or arbitrariness. Petition is dismissed. No costs. :2: :2: :2: *****