1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9829/2009 Karan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order : 20.10.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's claim is that he was appointed as driver in the Forest Department and his services were terminated then he approached the labour court wherein award was passed in his favour and the respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner and pay all back wages and according to the petitioner in view of the award, his services were required to be deemed to be continuous. The respondent-State challenged the award by preferring the writ petition before this Court against the award as well as against the order passed on petitioner's application filed under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner also approached this Court seeking execution of the award dated 5.1.1994 and all these petitions are pending. 2 The petitioner's contention is that petitioner was taken back in service and his regularly working as driver. The petitioner's claim is that he is not being paid the salary of driver and he is being paid Rs.750/- per month. In view of the facts stated above itself, it is clear that the petitioner's grievance can be well redressed by the proper forum and i.e., the labour court. Otherwise also, the petitioner's fate may be depending upon the ultimate decision given in the writ petition. How the petitioner be paid during the pendency of the earlier disputes also can be well examined by the labour court after taking into account all the relevant facts and labour court also independently may decide the issue whether the petitioner is entitled to a particular pay scale or not if the operation of the award itself has not been stayed by the High Court. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the learned labour court in accordance with law. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-