IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28348 of 2011(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- JASMINE, D/O.BUSHARA BEEVI, DREAM LAND, OLAPPANACHA, THUMBODE, KALLARA P.O., NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.R.V.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL POLICE DISTRICT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMNAGAD POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695545 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMNAGAD POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695545 4. SAKKEER, S/O.ABDUL VAHEED, KAVUVILA VEEDU, MANDHIRAMKUNNU, MATHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695540 5. SHAJI, S/O.SAINULABDHEEN, MUNTAZ MANZIL MURUTHAM, THACHONAM, KALLARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST- 695541 R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. DINESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 28348/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15/10/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2: COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE SUBMISSION OF EXT.P1 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3: COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE SUBMISSION OF EXT.P1 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE SUBMISSION OF EXT.P1 TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 28348 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. As directed by us, the learned Government Pleader Sri.Dinesh Mathew Manjooran has taken notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. We are of the view that, in the nature of the limited relief which we are giving to the petitioner hereunder, it is not necessary to issue notice to the party respondents. 2. The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that there is threat to her life from respondents 4 and 5 who are in inimical terms with the petitioner's husband who is presently abroad. According to the petitioner, though she submitted Ext.P1 petition before the 3rd respondent - Sub Inspector of Police having jurisdiction over the area, the Sub Inspector has not so far taken any action. 3. The writ petition is disposed of issuing the following directions; WPC.No.28438/2011 2 The 3rd respondent will immediately take up Exts.P1 and conduct thorough enquiry into the same. If necessary, the 3rd respondent will summon respondents 4 and 5 for completing the above enquiry. If the enquiry reveals that the allegations in Ext.P1 are correct, the 3rd respondent will take such action as is necessary for protecting the lives of the petitioner and all members of the petitioner's family, who are residing along with her, from all danger. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk