IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 604 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Farooque S/o Hasim 2. Nanoo S/o Noor Hasan 3. Babu S/O Jani 4. Sajid S/o Shokin 5. Bundu S/o Binda 6. Baljora S/o Rasila 7. Riyasat S/o Jani 8. Liyakat S/o Jani All R/o Village Mundlana, Police Station – Manglor. District Haridwar .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. through S.S.P., Haridwar 2. Station Officer, Police Station Manglor, District Haridwar. 3. Shri Ismile S/o Sultan Ahmad, R/o Village Mundlana, P.S. Manglor, District Haridwar .......... Respondents .......... Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri H.C.Pande, A.G.A. respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri H.C.Pande, A.G.A. for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous, as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioners and their co-accused persons before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 10.07.2006 10.07.2006 A