IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1360 OF 2009 Dt.15.12.2009 Between: The District Collector, Khammam District Khammam and others … Appellants And Gantasala Chadra Shekar and others … Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: G.P. for Revenue Counsel for the Respondents: Sri D. Prakash Reddy, Senior Counsel for Ms. M. Vidyavathi THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1360 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Appeal arises out of order dt.26.8.2009 in Writ Petition No.11602 of 2009. After getting instructions, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue, representing the appellants, submitted that the respondents have put the fish seeds in the disputed fish ponds. The learned Counsel for both the parties, on instructions, agreed that the respondents will be permitted to harvest the resultant fish in pursuance of the seeds already put by the respondents in the fish ponds. The appellant No.2, headed by appellant No.1, will consider the entire issue in the light of the report submitted by the technical committee, constituted by the Government as per G.O. Ms. No.83, dt.12.9.2007 as modified by G.O. Ms. No.18, dt.26.3.2008. Having regard to the agreement between the parties, the Writ Appeal is disposed of with the following directions. (i) Appellant No.2 shall consider the relevant reports, including the report submitted by the technical committee, and pass appropriate order, after hearing the respondents within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order; (ii) The appellants should permit the respondents to harvest the existing fish upto 31.5.2010; and (iii) The respondents are not entitled to put fish seeds afresh and they are also not permitted to harvest the fish after 1.6.2010, unless appellant No.2 passes an order in favour of the respondents. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.2852 of 2009, filed by the appellants – petitioners, for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15.12.2009 bnr