- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.369 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4658 OF 1988 Mr.A.V.Anturkar for the Petitioner. Mr.Balasaheb Bandal h/f Uday Warunjikar for Respondents Nos.1(A) to 1(C) & 2 to 5. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 27TH APRIL,2005 P.C.: Admittedly, the order by which review is sought was signed on 14-12-2002. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant himself states that pendency of the earlier civil application was totally irrelevant for filing an application for review of the order dated 14-12-2002, which according to the learned Counsel was signed by the - 2 - court on 14-12-2002. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner is not able to give me any reason why if the order was admittedly signed on 14-12-2002, the application for review was not filed and the Petitioner waited till February, 2004 for filing the application. As there is no reason disclosed for the delay, obviously the delay cannot be condoned. Application disposed of. ...