CRM-M-25865 of 2011 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-25865 of 2011 Date of Decision:01.11.2011 Gurvinder Singh and others . . .Petitioners Versus State of Union Territory, Chandigarh . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.R.S. Bassi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Ashima Mor, Advocate, for U.T., Chandigarh. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.168 dated 15.6.2011 under Sections 323 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) in which Section 308 IPC was added later on, at Police Station Sector 11, Chandigarh. Notice of motion was issued on 26.8.2011 and arrest of petitioners No.1 & 3 was stayed on 2.9.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners have joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh but she has opposed bail application of petitioner No.3 on the ground that because of the injury caused by him Section 308 was added on the opinion given by the Doctor that due to the said injury on the head a depression has been caused in the skull. Insofar as petitioner No.1 is concerned, his bail application is not opposed by learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh on the ground that he had not caused injury which constitute Section 308 IPC. CRM-M-25865 of 2011 - 2 - In view of the aforesaid, bail application of petitioner No.1 is allowed and the order dated 02.09.2011 qua him is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Bail application of petitioner No.3 is hereby declined. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 01, 2011 JUDGE Vivek