1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1169 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO. 1087 OF 2008 1.Gangadhar Krishna Pukale & ors........Appellants versus State of Maharashtra....... Respondant. Mr. Vishwanath Talkute Appellant/applicant Mr. M.M. Deshmukh APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 23rd OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. The learned counsel states that he is not pressing the bail application for accused no.2. There is no bail application by accused no.1. So far as the accused no.3 is concerned, she was on bail during trial and her age is shown in the title of the Sessions case as 68 years and therefore she may be more than 70 years of age, since the offence is taken place on 2006. Taking into consideration her age, we are inclined to grant bail to her. Therefore sentence of accused no.3 from Sessions case No.235/06 2 is suspended under sec. 389 Cr.P.C. The accused no.3 Jamunabai be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount. (R.V. MORE,J) S. B. MHASE, J. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1087 OF 2008 Gangadhar Krishna Pukale & ors........Appellants versus State of Maharashtra....... Respondant. Mr. Vishwanath Talkute Appellant/applicant Mr. M.M. Deshmukh APP for State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED: 23rd OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: Admit. (R.V. MORE,J.) (S.B. MHASE,j.)