1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5423 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Applicant Versus Pradeep Gyanchand Raisoni and ors. .. Respondents Mr K.B.Choudhari, A.G.P. for applicant Mr P.R.Patil, Advocate for respondents (original petitioners) CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 3rd May 2011 PER COURT The present review application has been filed against the order dated 23.3.2011. By our order, we had directed the respondent No.5 to consider the objections raised by the petitioners on 15.7.2006. In the review application, the applicants have mentioned that the petitioners were represented through an Advocate and were heard by the Soni Committee, which prepared its report and submitted the same on 30.8.2008. However, the learned Assistant Government Pleader has not been able to point out that these very objections of the petitioners contained in the representation dated 15.7.2006 have been heard. In these circumstances, the review application is dismissed. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (94.11ra)