IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7362 of 2011 Ram Briksh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/ 11.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 1.10.2010 and allegation against him is that he caught hold of the informant and after that co-accused Ajay Yadav lit her on fire. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that co-accused Santosh Yadav, who poured kerosene oil on the informant, has already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court vide order dated 26.5.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 13605/2011. It would appear from perusal of the order dated 12.5.2011 that complete injury report had been called for from the court of the CJM, Gaya but S.P. Gaya has sent again part injury report of the informant. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State informs this court that detailed injury report of the informant has not been incorporated by the Investigating officer in the case diary and without obtaining complete injury report, I.O. has submitted charge sheet. In the circumstances, let the petitioner, Ram Briksh Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Bodh Gaya P.S. Case no. 169/2010. Furthermore, S.P. Gaya should look into the matter and take 2 action against the erring Investigating officer. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)