StNSLE BENCH (<X) ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3738 QF 2006 PETITIONER ^xV' ^'<k/ / ^" ^^ ^.^y^ ...••" ^•••6&-""" ^^ ^' v^- RESPQNDENTS ^^'D-^^ 'Q^€^s^ G^^ /^-' F.;G-' 1. Sampatram/aged about 42 years, Son of Shri Dalsai, Occupation- Service, Presently working as Revenue Inspector , R. I. Circle Batouli, Tahsil Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). y 2. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). /' 3. The Commissioner, (Land Records), Raipur (C.G.). 4. The Collector, District Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.). :a^. jic';/ APAC!'',"', ?!.! i'^^ft.'svfi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 sn^Tqirf^TN; <raT3:n^Tsbii<t> Soma HI*IMI ai^ich ^ST ^i|i)ici<<, (STflu'is, Rirti'yy _^ ^.' •:^^/^ 200^ STT^T tRW (yit^q<^<T) WdTWflfScTSn^T 3-S-20W Mr. P.P. Sahu, counsel fo|r Mr. Vinay Pandey, Pan|el advanca copy. Heard both the counset. By the insfant writ petitio( of India, the petitioner has que^t (Annexure P-1) on the ground U|iat he has been transferred. Leamwl counsel for the | already made a representation No.1 be directed to decide tti^ Lawyer appearing for the State/r^s Having heard leamed facts and circumstances of the on merit of the case, the petitioner is just, fair and rea^ directed to decide the period of 30 days from the dat^ considering the points ralsed by WiUi the direction aforesal Consequently, M.(W.)P.t Partiesare entiUed for certified <til'i)fd4)-< i-111<lTfff3I^<Rl«;l< ^STf^ITSII^T the peBtioner. Lawyer for the Stsde/respondents, on under ArUcle 226/227 of the Constitution ioned the transfer order dated 30-6-2006 wittiin 8 monttis i.e. short span of time, cotinsel reduest represe|itetion If^tioner submits that the petitioner has (o respondent No.1, frierefore, respondent representation, to which leamed Panel ^spondents has no objection. for the parties, having regard to the |case and without expressing any opinion made by leamed counsel for the ^onable. Therefbre, respondent No.1 is made by the peBttoner within a :^ of receipt of a copy of ttils order, after (he petitioner, in accordance wtth law. jd, the petifion slands disposed of. ).2958Q006 also stands disposed of. copy ofthis order. Nb L-C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. v