1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3405 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LODG) NO.278 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2177 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO.2176 OF 2003 1.Jasmin Mahendra Vora & others. ...Appellants. vs. 1.Mahesh Khetshibhai Mehta & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.Jaideep Mitra i/b. T.N.Tripathi & Co., for Appellants. None for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. 2 DATED: 24th July,2007. P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for appellants. Even assuming that there is sufficient cause shown for condonation of delay, it is clear from the order impugned that all that has been done by the learned Single Judge was that the learned Single Judge has recorded statement made on behalf of the defendants and it is clear from the order that the order was passed by consent of the parties. Hence, the appeal and the notice of motion are disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) 3 ---