IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 588 OF 2007 SHRI. SHRIKANT VISHNU DEUSKAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. JAYANT KASHINATH SAKHALKAR ... Respondent Mr. V. R. Parshekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 14th February, 2008 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Parshekar, the learned Counsel on behalf of the petitioner, who is defendant in R.C.S. No. 216/06/D. 2. By impugned order dated 26/09/2007, the learned Civil Judge has declined to grant amendment to the counter claim. By the proposed amendment, the defendant had sought declaration of the sale deed dated 16/11/2000 as null and void. The said defendant had filed written statement on 3/01/2003 and the said written statement shows that the sale deed was very much to the knowledge of the said defendant. The learned Civil Judge has declined to grant the said prayer as being time barred. In my view, the said order cannot be faulted. It is not a fit case for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction. 3. Petition dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH