IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2011 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32948 of 2011(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- KURIAKOSE S.V., AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.VARAGHESE, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.C.C.33/1443, SHANTI NAGAR, VENNALA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.ANTONY MATHEW SRI.GEEN T. MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682011. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682025. 4. P.JAYALAKSHMI, W/O.P.MURALEEDHARAN, KODAMASSERY HOUSE, CHALIKKAVATTOM, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-28, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P. MANGUZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs WPC.NO.34948/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED BEARING NO.3/2004 DATED 02/01/2004 OF THE SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, KALLIDAIKURICHI IN TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 4TH RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 32948 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. It was submitted by Sri.Shyson P. Manguzha learned Government pleader on the basis of the instructions from the 3rd respondent - Sub Inspector of Police that the accusations of police harassment levelled against the 3rd respondent are not correct. A complaint was received from the 4th respondent against the petitioner. The petitioner's attendance was requested only in connection with the enquiry to be conducted into the above complaint. The petitioner never turned up for the enquiry. He filed the present writ petition before this court. However, as the enquiry conducted by the police in the absence of the petitioner reveals that the nature of the dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent is purely civil , the 3rd respondent has decided not to continue with the petition. Attendance of the petitioner is no longer required by the 3rd respondent. W.P.(C) No. 32948 /2011 2 We record all the submissions of the learned Government Pleader and dispose of this writ petition without issuing any further directions. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.HARILAL, JUDGE. dpk W.P.(C) No. 32948 /2011 3