IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.8676-M of 2010 Date of Decision:11.5.2010 Anil Verma and others .... Petitioners Versus Vandana Chaudhary .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. K.S. Kahlon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in complaint case No.18 dated 25.3.2009 titled as Vandana Chaudhary v. Anil Verma Proprietor M/s Verma Money Transfer Agency and Ors. registered under Sections 418,419,420,465,467,468,471,506 and 120-B IPC pending in the Court of Sh. Jaspal Verma, PCS, SDJM, Dasuya. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that the signatures of the respondent/complainant were forged. The amount involved is Rs.20,000/-. The same is matter of evidence. It is further stated that in pursuance to the order dated 23.3.2010, the petitioners have appeared before the trial Court and furnished bail bonds. Accordingly, order dated 23.3.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 11.5.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE