IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45035 of 2008 NIRANJAN KUMAR MAHTO @ NIRANJAN MAHTO … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Dharmendra Kr.Sinha For the State: Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 2. 10.11.2008 Heard. The renewal prayer is on the grounds that the learned Additional Sessions Judge cancelled the order of bail granted by his predecessor and that power was not vested in him and that the father of the deceased, who happens to be the informant, deposed in court during the trial and in his deposition the man has stated that the petitioner had nothing to do with the occurrence. The third ground is that the case was improved upon after the receipt of the post mortem examination report. This Court had noted down in its earlier decision that if an order of bail appears outside the jurisdiction of the court any court could cancel it. As regards the submission that the father has deposed about the innocence of the petitioner, I have gone through the deposition and the father 2 does not appear to be an eye witness, he was merely a person who was informed about the incident. As such, his deposition does not have any bearing on the final result of the matter. The improvement in the prosecution case after receipt of the post mortem examination report could also be a question to be decided by the trial court. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)