3 HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHjJBILASPUR Wnt Petinon No. 42 of 2006 Hemaiiti-am Thakur, S/o Shri Matbal Sai Thakur, aged about 38 years, Assistant Veterinaiy Field Officer, R/o Ward No.6 Chaadinari, District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhatisgarh, through Secretaiy, Agricultuial Departiaent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipm- (C.G.) 2. Director, Vetennaiy Seryices, Directorate of Veteriiiaiy Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Director, In chsi-ge Pashu Mata Maham.an Uitmulan Yojana, BUaspur (C.G.) (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aglliliotri J.) Shri Anoop Majuiadar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashaak Thakur, Paael Law^'er for the respondents. 2. Passed on fhis 25th day ofJune, 2009) The petitioner has filed fhis writ petition chaUenging ftie transfer order dated 16.12.2005. According to leaiTied counsel appearmg for the petitioner, by virtue of ttie iaterim. oi-der dated 5.1.2006, passed by this Court, fhe petitioner is contrauiug at fhe origiaal place of posttag. Be that as it m.ay, wifh fhe passage of tune, this wiit petition has becoine infructuous, as flie perioa of trausfer is not applicable forever. At this point of time, it is not necessaq? to exainitie ttie legaHty aud vaUdify of fhe traiisfer order, as fhe unpugned order coiild not be given effect to 011 account of the interua stay order dated 5.1.2006, passed by tliis Cottrt. However, the respondents are at libert\r to pass appropriate orders, keepiiig in view fhe pubUc iaterest and adrmTtistrative A/i4 3. Thafa.lr exigeucy, if so advised, wifhoiit iusistmg on compBajice of the impugned transfer order. In view of fhe above, this writ petition staads disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- S.K. Agnihotri Judge