IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 26398 of 2001 Between: 1) E.Mallikarjuna Reddy S/o. E.Venkata Reddy R/o. D.No.46-682, B & c(Upstairs), Kurnool, Kurnool district. 2) T.Mohan Goud, S/o. T.Thimmappa Goud, R/o.D.No.52/237, Old Bus Stand, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3) I.Padmanabha Reddy S/o. I.Hanimi Reddy R/o. D.No.40/354/3, Park Road, Kurnool District, 4) A.Subba Rao S/o. A.V.Subbaiah R/o. D.No.51/916B/27-28, S.V.R.Complex, Opp.New bus Stand, Kurnool District. 5) A.vijaya Kumar S/o. A.chidambara Reddy R/o. D.no.40/301-3, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 6) D.Subbaiah S/o.D.Sunkanna R/o. D.No.49/1A-244, Maddhurnagar, Kurnool, Kurnool district. 7) M.Janardhan Goud S/o. M.Raman Goud R/o. D.No.40-393/25 & 26 Shops & Upstairs, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 8) M.Lakshman goud S/o.M.Raman Goud R/o.D.No.45-Peta, Block No.1 (shop No.1 to 5), Kurnool Kurnool District. .... PETITIONERS AND The Municipal Corporation, Kurnool, Kurnool District. ....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Notification issued by the Respondent-Corporation vide his Proc.Rc.7378/98/F2, dt.24.12.1999 and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary so far as the item No.9 of part III (Bar & Restaurants) are concerned so far as applicability of the same to newly opened Bar & Restaurants in pursuance of the G.O.Ms.No.234, Rev. (Excise.II) Dept., dt.30.3.2001 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent : MR.A.SREEDHAR The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO. 26398 of 2001 ORDER : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI, J 16th FEBRUARY, 2009 SUR