^^^- c-~ Indu iTTISGARHAT IR '^siNsAZgS.sLZQOl PetjtjQner Mukesh Patel S/o. Shri Rampratap Patet Aged about - 32 years R/o. SangramColony, Satna, Distt. -Satna Respondents Versus •I. 3. 4. 5. l.p.) Chairman,, Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) Director (P. & IR.), Coal India Ltd., 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (VV.B.) Member Secretary, JBCC - VI (Joint Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry), Coal India Ltd. 10, Nstaji Subjash Road, Kokata (W.B) Chalrman-Cum-Managlng Dlrector, S.E.C.L Head Qtr. Seeptat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) Chief General manager, Hasdeo Area, Shahdol Distt. - Shahdol (M.P.) (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India) Slnale Bench: Hon'bte Justice Satish K. Aanihotri Present : ShriRahul Mishra, counse! for thepetltioner. >hri Praveen Das, counsei forthe respond.ents/SECL. (Passed on3ra July, 2007) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the )etiSioner is similarly sltuated to that of the respondents In the matter of Chatrman, Central Coalfieids Ltd. & others Vs. Jlvendra Prasad Tiwari & others (Civil Appea! No.1714 of 2007). Learned .counsel further submits that the said Civii Appeal has been dlsposed of vide order dated 29 March, 2007, passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of tndia. t •Learned counsel further submits that ihis case may atso be disposed of in the same terms, to which the learned counsel appearing for the respondents/S.E.C.L. does not controvert. !. tn view of the above, the petition stands disposed of In the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge