1 IN THE HIC H COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE I 1” DAY OF AUGUST2010 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S,N.SATYANARAYANA CCC NO.3035 OF 2010 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: Yallapp S/o Yamanappa Chalawadi, Age: About 41 years. 0cc: Physical Teacher, R/o Balawat Post, Muddebihal Taluk, Bijapur District. Complainant (By Sri.Sudhir Singh R. Vijapur, Advocate) AND: 1. G.S. Pararnashivappa Age: 55 years, 0cc: DDPI, The Deputy Director, Public Instructions Bijapur District Bijapur. 2. M.M.Angadi Age: 56 years. 0cc: BEO The Block Education Officer, Public Instructions, Muddebihal Taluk 4’ Muddebihal. ondent V 1 (By Sri.S.S.Kumman, Government Advocate for Ri & R2)at 2 This CCC is filed under Sections 1 1 and 1 2 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for having disobeyed the directions given by this Hon’hle Court dated 16.12.2008 passed in W.P.No.40981/2008 as at Annexure-A and punish him in accordance with law a further direct the Respondent No.6, BEO Muddebihal to consider the application filed by the complainant and release his salary, in the interest of justice and ecjuitv. This CCC coming on for orders this day, Mr.N.K.PATIL, J. made the following: ORDER The learned Government Advocate appearing for the accused filed the counter affidavit along with annexures. the same is taken on record, 2. In the instant contempt petition, the complainant prays to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for having disobeyed the direction issued by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 16.12.2008 in W.P. No.40981/2008 and punish them in accordance with law and to further direct the sixth respondent to consider the application filed by the complainant and release his salary in the interest of justice and equity. S 3 3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the complainant and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the accused. 4. DurIng the course of the submissions, the learned Government Advocate appearing for Accused/ Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who are present before Court. has obtained instructions from the second respondent. On their instructions, he submitted that the salary has been released from 01.01.2010 to 30.07.2010, the remaining dues have already been recommended and forwarded to the Commissioner, Public Instructions for taking approval and the same will also be released. 5. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for Accused! Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who are present before Court as stated supra, the contempt proceedings Initiated by the complainant stands dropped with a direction to Accused/Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to release the remaining salary due to the complainant after taking 4 approval from the Commissioner, Public Instructions, immediately. With these observations, the contempt proceedings initiated by the complainant stands dropped. Sd/ JUDGE Sd! 3UDGE swk