Dmt 1 cal176-2011 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 176 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5752 OF 1999 Maharashtra State Financial Corporation. .... Appllicant. vs. Nimba Jagannath Tamboli & Ors. .... Respondents. Ms. N.R. Patankar i/by V.P. Savant for Applicant. Mr. V.P. Vidya for Respondents. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the learned Single Judge erred in granting 100% back-wages to the concerned employee. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that considering the facts of the case the learned Single Judge was justified in granting full back wages. The only question which arises in this matter is regarding quantum of back-wages as the Dmt 2 cal176-2011 concerned respondent has already retired from service after being reinstated in service. In view of the same, the order passed by the Labour Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 145 of 1990 which is confirmed by the Industrial Court in Revision Application No. 152 of 1997 which is confirmed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 5752 of 1999 is stayed during the pendency of this appeal on the condition that the appellant shall deposit 40% of the back-wages within two weeks from today before the Registrar of this Court. On depositing such amount, the respondent workman shall be entitled to withdraw the said amount unconditionally. 2. The civil application is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.)