IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1227 of 2009() ------------------------------------------------ CRA.980/2006 of SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM CC.385/2005 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, NEYYATTINKARA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------------- THAJUDEEN, SON OF MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA, SHEEBAS VEEDU, T.C.NO.55/1205, SANKAR NAGAR, KAIMANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.M.PREM RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. DASSAN, SON OF JOSEPH, LEKAH BHAVAN, OLATHANNI, NEYYATTINKARA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAYAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No.1227 of 2009 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 03.04.2009 ORDER The accused in C.C.No.385 of 2005 on the file of the J.F.C.M-I, Neyyattinkara for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No.3670 of 2009 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj