IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32343 of 2008 MD.IBRAN SAHA @ IBRAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.8.2008 Heard. While granting bail to the petitioner the court himself put a condition of remaining physically present in the court below on all dates, unless prevented by sufficient cause. The contention is that the petitioner was residing in Delhi and is engaged in some employment and the condition put upon by this court upon the petitioner has dislocated his employment-life and has rendered him idle. The contention further is that other accused who was also saddled with similar condition, was given the relief by a Bench of this court in Cr.Misc.No.14246 of 2008. It is contended that petitioner shall remain physically present on all dates when it is urgently required by the court below or when the petitioner has to remain physically present for answering a charge or replying to the question put to him or for any other purposes and that the petitioner shall not raise the issue of being prejudiced by his - 2 - absence during the hearing of a witness or the trial. I could direct that the above undertakings shall be considered at any time as and when the petitioner raised the issue of prejudice. As regards the prayer for lifting the condition the court is not inclined to do it without a rider that on all dates when the trial court requires the petitioner to be present, the petitioner could not take any plea but present himself in the court for whatever purposes the court demands him to do it. The modification petition is allowed in the above terms. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )