IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.376 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.7.2009 Gangadhar & others. -----Appellants Vs. Financial Commissioner, Haryana & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Ajit Malik, Advocate for the appellants. ----- ORDER: 1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment of the learned Single Judge, dismissing the writ petition of the appellants. 2. The writ petition was filed against order of the revenue authorities including order dated 27.1.2009 passed by Financial Commissioner, finalizing the partition proceedings. 3. Grievance of the appellants is that allocation of shares was not as per mode of partition determined. 4. Learned Single Judge held that the contention of the appellants could not be accepted. The area was inspected by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade and contention that the appellants L.P.A. No.376 of 2009 were given less area adjacent to road, was found not to be correct. 5. The findings recorded by the revenue authorities, on facts, about the land being of equal value, is not liable to be interfered with, as rightly held by the learned Single Judge. 6. No ground is, thus, made out for interference with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. 7. The appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE July 09, 2009 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) ashwani JUDGE 2