BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15025 of 2011 SELVAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT CR NO. 201/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 342, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) and 307 of IPC in Crime No.201 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. He has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.A.Uthayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that due to land dispute, the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the de-facto complainant and attacked. He would further submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not committed any crime as stated in the complaint. He would further submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that he is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the case is mainly against this petitioner and the overt acts are only by him. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankoil, Tirunelveli District and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 21/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SANKARANKOIL, TIRUNELVELI DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT +1. CC to M/S. A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.40771 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15025 of 2011 Date :21/11/2011 SMA/24.11.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/