IN THE HIGH COURT OP KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19’” DAY OF APRiL, 2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. JAGAN NATHAN CRL.P.NO. 10495/201.1 Between: Rajappa d. Nagaraj S/o.Timmappa Gollar, Age 35 years. 2. Suresh S/o.Fakeerappa Airani, Age 28 years, Both are agriculturists, R/o.Belur Village, Tq.: Ranebenn ur, Dist.: Haven. Petitioners (By Sri.G.M.Bhat. Advocate for Circuit law Firm) And: The State of Karntaka. By its Ranebennur Rural Police, Ranebenflur, Represented by State Public Prosecutor. High Court Circuit Bench Building. Dh arwad. Respondent (By Sri.Vinavak Kulkarni, HCGP) This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.250/2010 of Ranehennur Police Station, for the offenices p/u/s 143, 147, 323. 324, 341, 504, 353, 506, 307 r/w. 149 of IPC. -2- This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Heard petitioners’ counsel Sri.G.M.Bhat and also the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent- State in respect of the bail sought by the petitioners who are accused No.2 and 8 in Crime No.250/2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 341, 504, 353, 506, 307 read with Section 149 of the IPC. 2. The submission of the petitioners counsel is that, though this court had earlier rejected the bail application before filing of the charge sheet, now the petitioners seeks bail subsequent to filing of the charge sheet and referring to wound certificate, he argued that, the complainant sustained only one simple injury and therefore, the petitioners be released on bail and moreover, the accused No.6 is already on bail. It is also submitted that, if 50 to 60 persons have assaulted the complainant with weapons the police could have recovered more weapons, but only one small stick is recovered and the injury sustained by the complainant is only simple injury, on this ground bail is sought. 3. Though the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State argued that. this court had earlier rejected the bail application and taking note of the charge sheet material now placed and the wound certificate indicates that, the complainant had suffered only one simply injury, in my view, these petitioners can be released on hail by imposing conditions. Hence, I pass the following order: ORDER i) The petitioners shall be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for Rs.50.000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial court. ii) They shall not tamper with the evidence and shall not give threat to the prosecution witnesses in any manner. iii) They shall mark their attendance before the jurisdictional police station on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m and 5.00 p.m. iv) They shall not involve themselves in the like offences in future. Sd/ ‘L:flp jrjt GE