THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.22493 of 2000 ORAL ORDER: On 25.1.2010, when the matter has come up for consideration, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed next week under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Again when the matter has come up on 1.2.2010, still there was no representation on behalf of petitioner, therefore the matter was directed to be listed next week. Even today when the matter is taken up for hearing in the forenoon session, none appears for the petitioner. The matter was passed over and again taken up in the afternoon session, but none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation. In the circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for default/non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 9.2.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.22493 of 2000 9.2.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.22493 of 2000 Date: 9th February, 2010 Between: M/s Teak Tiles India, rep. by its Propreitor, S.A.Abbas Moosvi. .. Petitioner And Divisional Forest Officer, WLM, Jannaram, Adilabad district & others. .. Respondents