Petitioner Respondents Hi<3H COURT OF GHHATriSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petltjon (SS No. 35S1 of 2008 Vikas Kumar Kewar, S/o. iate Shri Babuiai Kewar, 'aged about 51 yeara, oocupation - Sen/loe, on the post of incharge Assistant Engineer at Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Pariyojna Knyanwan Ekai-1,. Korba, District Korba (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayat and Rurai Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur(CG). 2) AdditionaS Seoretarv, Panchayat and Rurai Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur, Distrid: Ralpur (CG). 3) Chief Englneer, Rurai Engineering Services/Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Vikas Bhawan, Raipur, Dtstrict Rajpur (CG). (Wrst Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenfc Shri Awadh Tripath! counsej for the petltioner. Shri Y. S.' Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generai fbr the Smte. Gi^AL ORDER (Passed on 17th day of<juSy, 2008) With consent of iearned counse! appearing for both the parties, the matter is heard finaIEy. 2) Learned counsei appearing tbr the petitioner submits that tne petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at thls stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representati'on before the ooncemed authorities within a period of three days and the same rnay be directed to be decided, in accordanc^ with Saw, within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Y.S. Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate Generai appearing for the State submits that if the representatlon is made, the same shaii be oonsldered and decided by the cor?cemed authQrity, in aocordance with iaw, on its own merits, wjthln a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) in view'of the foregoing, nothing sun/ives in the matter. iVlr. Tnakur further submlts that no coercrve steps shali be teken against the petitioner, tiii the disposai ofthe representatjon. 5) AccordingSy, the petition js disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge