IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16001 of 2009 JAWAHAR PRASAD YADAV S/O LATE DAROGA RAI R/O VILL.- DHARIPUR, P.S.- DIGHWARA, DISTT.- SARAN…….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER SARAN DIVISION SARAN AT CHAPRA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARAN AT CHAPRA 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SONEPUR (SARAN) 4. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, SARAN AT CHAPRA 5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SONEPUR (SARAN) 6. THE BLOCK SUPPLY OFFICER, DIGHWARA (SARAN) ………….RESONDENTS For the petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, AC to GP-5 ----------- 02/ 19.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing Sub-Divisional Officer, Sonepur, Saran (respondent no.3) to restore the petitioner’s P.D.S. Licence No.10 of 1985 which was cancelled as far back as on 28.11.2002 by the Licensing Authority. From the facts and circumstances of the case it is quite apparent that the petitioner has lost before the Licensing Authority as well as the appellate authority and also revisional authority, who arrived at current findings against the petitioner. The said order has also been affirmed by this court vide order dated 14.07.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No.6501 of 2006. The said order of learned Single Judge of this court was challenged in L.P.A. No.667 of 2008, but the same was allowed to be withdrawn meaning thereby the order passed by the learned Single Judge was affirmed. However, mere liberty being given to the petitioner to pursue remedy before the concerned authority does - 2 - not mean that a remedy will be created specially for the petitioner when all the remedies have already been exhausted. In the said circumstances, this court does not find any merit in this writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. Harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)