1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1903 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2202 OF 1988 Noshi M.Elavia ...Plaintiff vs. Kamlakar Trimbhak Mahadik ...Defendant And Ms Pushpa Kamlakar Mahadik & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.U.J.Makhija, Sr.counsel for the plaintiff Mr.Sachin Punde for respondent nos.1 to 3 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiffs in support of the chamber summons. Heard the learned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the respondents opposed the chamber summons. In view of the averments made in the affidavit in support, a case is made out for making the chamber summons absolute by condoning the delay. The averments made in the affidavit make out a case of existence of sufficient cause for condonation of delay. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). Amendment to be carried out within a period of six weeks from today. The learned counsel for the respondents waives service of writ of summons. JUDGE