HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.793 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is the owner of Hero Honda Passion Motor Cycle, which was not registered. The vehicle in question involved in P.R.No.605 of 2010 – 2011 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Yellandu, Khammam District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 7 (A) read with 8 (e) of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995. In view of the said involvement, the vehicle in question was seized and as such, the present petition is filed seeking for release of the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and in view of the fact that the petitioner is the owner and is eking out his livelihood from out of the income derived from the vehicle in question, this Court is of the view that the vehicle in question can be ordered to be released in favour of the petitioner by imposing certain conditions. Accordingly, the vehicle in question is hereby ordered to be released in favour of the petitioner on the following conditions: 1) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Yellandu, Khammam District. 2) He shall give an undertaking that he will produce the vehicle in question as and when required and he shall not alienate the same during the course of enquiry, investigation and trial. Subject to the above conditions, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J April 01, 2011 MD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.793 OF 2011 April 01, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.793 OF 2011 Between: Guguloth Shanker ..... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh ....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: