IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22749 of 2010 1. WAHISHA KHATOON 2. Najmun Khatoon 3. Suleman Nadaf Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23.07.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the prayer of the petitioner no.1 since during the pendency of the application, he has been arrested. Such permission is granted. Accordingly, the application of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that co-accused Shahid Nadaf was in love of informant’s daughter, Sangita Kumari. They left their house and living together as wife and husband may not be their marriage legal or valid due to their belonging of different religion or being the victim minor but petitioners are married sister and father of Shahid Nadaf having no concern with disappearance of both the boy and girl if really it was a case of kidnapping even. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the 2 petitioners no. 2 and 3 for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Manighachi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2010, above named petitioners no. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Darbhanga subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)