IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5990 of 2010 KANCHAN DEVI, WIFE OF SANTOSH KUMAR MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SUKHASHAN, WARD NO.5, POLICE STATION- SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA. 3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, MADHEPURA. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFIDCER, SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. 6. THE MUKHIYA, VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT SUKHASAN, BLOCK AND POLICE STATION- SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. 7. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VILLAGE AND DPANCHAYAT- SUKHASHAN, BLOCK AND POLICE STATION- SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT- SAHARSA. 8. SHOBHA DEVI, WIFE OF BIRENDRA YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SUKHASHAN, POLICE STATION- SINGHESHWAR, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. …………..RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 08.12.2010 Referring to Annexure-5, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the allegation of the petitioner in respect of appointment of respondent No.8 was found correct, no steps are being taken to remove her from the post of Anganwari Sevika. He points out that in respect of the same the petitioner has already filed an application before the District Program Officer on 19.12.2009 on the basis of findings of the Collector, Madhepura as contained in Annexure-6. He submits that in spite of the said findings final orders are not being passed in the matter. 2 In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the District Program Officer Madhepura, to take cognizance of the application of the petitioner dated 19.12.2009, hold an enquiry, examined the records and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Devendra/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)