C /W’ \ ”1" @ Single Bench I_N_ CHHATTISGARH THE HON’BLE AT BILASPUR HIGH C.G. COURT OF W.P. (S) Nog529/2011 BhOl Singh Sidar, S/o Shri Jaggu Sidar, Aged 55 Years, Principal, Higher Secondary School, Gadfuljhar Basna, District Mahasamund C.G. PETITIONER................ VERSUS The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh? Through — The Secretmy, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Mahasamund District Mahasamund ( C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUSIDIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. Wm... W, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUS'NCE MANINDRA MORAN SHRIVASTAVA W348! N0. 45291201 1 A earance: Shn‘ Somkant Varma, counsel for the pttitioner. Shu' N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State/respondents. oRAL ORDER (1 1.08.2011) The petitioner was initially appointed as Tcachar on. a iixed pay of Rs. 100. After complan'on of pxobation pcriod, he was granted I‘cgular pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issued invoived :in the case is as to Whether the petitioner is entitled t0 regular pay scale with e‘Eect from the date of tmtlal appointment or after completion of The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administtative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. NO. 2745/89 Madhukaut Yadu and 56 Others v. State of MP. & Others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated. teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with eh‘ect &om the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the etfect that the pmbation pen'od. Teachers] Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. F l Counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court, State of anhatasgarh a; Others, gnaw) Na. 4725/2006, by order i l while considering the same issue in Amar Sui Ram 8a Others Vs. PETITIONER Bhol Siug Sidar Versus RESPONDENTS State ofC.G. 81, @ dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising all the grievances, Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a nepxesentation raising all the grievances in light of the aforestated judgment and order dated 5.1.2011 (Annexure P/S) and in tum, the concemed m8pondent 1's directed to decide the representation, if any, subject to in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of three months dom the date of receipt of the representation, vermcation of the facts. In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. § ..... .... .. ... ...... .. .. .. Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge