HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2389 of 2007 Dated:09.02.2007 Between: Sri Lakkineni Venkateswara Rao. …Petitioner. and Chairman & Managing Director and others. …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2389 of 2007 ORDER: The 6th respondent is the son of the petitioner. There appears to be some disputes between them. The petitioner had two service connections in his name, viz., 1229 and 1256, for the premises bearing No.5-120, Kappalabandam Road, Kallur Village and Mandal, Khammam District. The said service connections were transferred by the 5th respondent in favour of the 6th respondent. On an objection raised by the petitioner, the transfer was cancelled and they were restored to him. Thereafter, the 6th respondent submitted an application and obtained an independent service connection bearing No.2993. The petitioner raises an objection for that. According to the petitioner, the premises are still in his name and the service connection ought not to have been extended to the 6th respondent, without his approval. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondents 1 to 5. The extension of power to any premises does not depend upon the ownership. On an application made by the occupant of a premises, the power supply can be extended. The petitioner does not dispute that his son, the 6th respondent, is residing in part of the premises. The record itself discloses that the petitioner did not permit the 6th respondent to draw power supply through the connections that are standing in his name. It was under these circumstances, the 6th respondent approached the concerned authorities and obtained independent power supply. This Court does not ﬁnd any basis to grant any relief to the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.09.02.2007 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J GJ