^^ ^cm^ (1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION^ N0. ^ /2007 PETITIONERS ^// %/ \^.1 ^y^- \J". .•.,:^sy -jy RESPONDENTS ^ 1) Indrapal Jogi, S/o Shri Chamru Jogi, aged about 83 years, Social Worker, R/o Ward No. 01 Pandariya, Nagar Panchayat- Pandariya, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. 2] Ram Kumar Tandan S/o Shri Hem Rai Tandan, aged about 40 years, R/o ward No. 03, Pandariya, Nagar Panchayat- Pandariya, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. 3] Vikas Shukla S/o Shri Umesh Kumar Shukla, aged about 31 years, R/o Bazarpara, Pandariya, Nagar Panchayat - Pandariya, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. 4] Narendra Tiwari, S/o Late Shri Khedu Prasad Tiwari, aged about 35 years, R/o Ward No. 06, Pandariya, Nagar Panchayat- Pandariya, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. VERSUS 1] .State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Nagariya Prashasan Avam Vikas Department, Raipur [C.G.]. ^.&T151? ^ Director, Nagariya Niyojan Avam ^ Vikas, Raipur [C.G.]. 3] CoUector, Kabeerdham [C.G.] 4] Sub Divisional Officer, Pandariya, District Kabeerdham [C.G.] 5] ShriT.P. Sahu, Chief Municipal ^ Officer [C.M.O.], Nagar Panchayat, Pandariya, Distt. Kabeerdham [CG] ^6] Smt. Pushpa Devi Bhaskar, President Nagar Panchayat- Pandariya, District Kabeerdham !A @ 0 7] Shri Devendra Pahadi, Sub- Engineer, Nagar Panchayat- Pandariya, District Kabeerdham ,8] Shri Hari Singh Thakur, Moharir Avam Prabhari Lok Nirman Vibhag, Nagar Panchayat- Pandariya, District Kabeerdham [C.G.]. WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE22(60F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T R-li<=h3TT^T ^rf^^cT '^ y T^T ^ll^lcn^, ^Tfl^Ko, f^<vll<rl^< 3ll^l45(Ch^ ^^.Stl.b $h^llcb ' +<|^^1 $b^icb 200 > fd^ 3TT^T^C<TTW^fN' 5-2-2007 Shri J.K. Shastri, counsej Shri Utkarsh Verma, Dy. Panel Lawyer fpr the.State/resp. for the petitioners. IGovt. Advocate and Shri Sumit Verma, t>ndents No.1 to 4. None for respondents No| Heard. Petitioners are residents |3f viliage Pandariya. On their complaint an enquiry was conducted 4 thereafter, a fact finding rep^rt was submitted by the enquiring committee. Despite the matter Collector, no action has been tai the delinquent persons. Hence, and misappropriated the fund o lodging this petition under Articl apptication under article 226 o' there must be infringement 01 enforced; therefore, petitioners complaint before the competent chi^f^i41vi ^i^<nT^TteT^t<Ri^i< ^3Tf^TW^T 5to8. gainst respondents No5 to 8 and being reported to the Director by the cen by respondents No.1 and 2 against thiswritpetition. Respondents No5 to 8 ^s alleged have committed irregularitjes Nagar Panchayat. This is not a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), but a|i individual petition. The grievances raised in the petition do not c|onfer any right to the petitioners, for l|e 226 of the Constitution of India. For the Constitution, it is necessary that right of the petitioners liable to be have no locus standi to file the instant petition. If any embezzlement h^s been committed by any respondent, petitioners may lodge First Inf^rmation Report (FIR) or file crimina! pourt having jurisdiction in accordance with criminal law. With the aforesaid obser^ations, the petition stands dispose^df. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge