IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 124 of 2010 Decided on: 9.3.2011 Smt. Usha Devi Nanda …Petitioner Versus Dr. P.C. Dhiman and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh Assistant Advocate General. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the respondents are ready and willing to implement the judgment in question, if the petitioner submits the requisite educational certificate of being matriculated. 2. Consequently, the present petition is closed with a direction to the petitioner to make available matriculation or equivalent educational qualification certificate before respondents. It is made clear that in the eventuality of production of requisite educational certificate by the petitioner, the consequences including DPC will follow. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 9, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?