c^ Slngle Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition (St N0.^/2011 ^^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,^ ..'.v^ ^y/ ^.^yy ^vv^V\ / ^^y .^ ^y' <^- ^ Smt. Yogeshwari Mahadik, w/o Shri S.R. Mahadik, aged about 46 years, (UDT) Posted, R/o govt. college of Education Shanker Nagar, Raipur VERSUS l./ State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) 3.^ Joint Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN^UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. ^ PET3TIONER RESPONDENTS WRST PETITSON (S) N0.2870/2011 Smt. Yogeshwari Mahadik Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others WRIT PETJTJON UNDER ARTSCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTiTUTION OF iND!A Present: - Shri Arun Kochar, counsel for the petjtioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15th of June,2011) The petitioner was initjally appointed as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay. ^ After completion of her probation period, she was granted reguiar pay scait. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the issue invoived in the case Is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay with effect from the date of initjal appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The jssue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunai, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/89 (MadhLikant Yadu and 56 Others v. ofM.P. & others), wherein it was held that the simiiarjy situated teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scaie with effect from the of initia! appointnient. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribuna! to the effect that the Teachers/AssJstant Teachers are entitied to regular pay from the of initial appointment. -^^ -1- ^ 4. Learned State counsel submitted that subsequently the State Govemment had issued various circulars with regard to grant of regular pay sca!e under certain conditions. 5. !n view of the above stated submissions made by tearned counse! for the the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. the petitioners are granted iiberty to make a representation, if so advlsed, to consider their case, if they stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-08-1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State AdministraSive Tribuna!, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745 of 89 Yadu fsupra^ and subsequently confirmed by order dated 03-01-1994 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.6892/1993 and such other reievant considerations as may be available to the State Government in accordance with the !aw and grant relief accordingly. 6. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Tumane