IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.339 of 2008 MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA, ADVOCATE, SON OF SRI IRADHA KANT MISHRA, RESIDENT OF GARAHUAN,, P.S.- KURHANI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ……Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE VIGILANCE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF VIGILANCE (CABINET) INVESTIGATION BUREAU, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE LAW SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 5. SIR NEEL MANI, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF VIGILANCE (CABINET), INVESTIGATION BUREAU, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. LAL BAHADUR RAM, SON OF JADU RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SRINAGAR, P.S. SIWAN MUFASSIL, DISTRICT- SIWAN, PRESENTLY POSTED AS DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DEPARTMENT OF VIGILANCE, INVESTIGATION BUREAU, 6 CIRCULAR ROAD, PATNA. 7. DR. JAGDISH SINGH, SON OF LATE BRAHMDEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF KHWASPUR, P.S.- PIRPANTI, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR, AT PRESENT POSTED AS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (NUTRITION), DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. ……..Respondents For the petitioner : Mr. Banwari Sharma, Advocate For the Vigilance : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, I/C Spl. P.P. 4 01.04.2009 Heard both sides. The complainant-petitioner has filed the present writ application seeking direction upon the respondents to initiate an inquiry/criminal proceeding under sections 195 and 340 of Code of Criminal Procedure against respondent no. 7 (Dr. Jagdish Singh). The principal contention made on behalf of the petitioner is that while pressing the said bail application, a wrong 2 statement was made that the case is still under investigation although charge sheet had already been filed inasmuch as sanction was also obtained. This Court perused the order granting bail. From perusal of the order, it appears that the Hon’ble Single Judge has assigned various other reasons for grant of bail. Having heard both the sides and after going through the records, this Court is not satisfied that any case meriting interference has been made out. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )