Singla‘ hash H @7/ ' ) M IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.p. No.2g5‘3 of 2004 PETITIONERS 1. Gopal Ghosh, S/o. Late Sudhéer'Ghosh, aged about 42 years, Occupation — Labourer, 2. Krishna Ghosh, S/o. Late Sudheer G/hosh aged about 38 years, Occupation ......... Both R/o. Village Chathirma, Tahsil — Ambikapur, District — Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2) Additional Collector Surguja 3‘ Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ‘ ‘ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 &, 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ § I W HIGH COURT OF CHI—IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition N0. 3953/2004 Appearance: Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. Shri Sunil Tripathi with Shri Rahul Mishra, counsel for respondent No.3. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22o & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (01.12.2010) Petitioners have challenged the order Annexure P-l passed by Additional Collector, Ambikapur on 17/09/2004 in Revenue Revision Case No. 31-A-19/2002-2003 on a revision petition preferred by respondent No.3 Nagendra Chandra Das. By the said order the Additional Collector has cancelled the lease granted in favour of petitioners. (2) The learned Additional Collector has exercised the revisional powers under the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959. Such an order is amenable to a second revision under the provisions of code before the Board of Revenue. (3) In View of the existence of alternative remedy, this court is not inclined to adjudicate the subject matter of the writ petition on merits. PETITIONERS : Gopal Ghosh and annther Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh and others (4) The petitioners, if they so desire, may prefer a duly constituted revision before the competent revenue court Within a period of 15 days from today. If such revision petition is preferred challenging the order Annexure P-l, the same shall be considered in accordance with law alter considering the petitioners prayer for condonation of delay sympathetically and in View of pendency of this writ petition during the period. The interim order passed by this court on 30/11/2004 staying the operation, implementation and execution of the order passed by the Additional Collector shall remain in force for a period of six weeks from today. (5) With this observation, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- _ Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge