CRM No. M-5346 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-5346 of 2008 Decided on:- 02.03.2009 Gurvinder Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri Present Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, A. A.G. Punjab. K. C. Puri,J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 19.4.2007, vide which he has been summoned under Section 319 Cr. P. C to stand trial for offence under Section 279,338 and 337 IPC in FIR No. 251 dated 10.7.2003, registered at Police Station Sadar Amritsar, and order dated 27.11.2007 Annexure P10, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar vide which revision was dismissed. The only grievance ventilated by the petitioner is that the complainant has not been cross examined and without his cross examination, the petitioner has been summoned and to support this contention he has relied upon authority Mohd. Shafi v. Mohd. Rafiq 2007 (2) RCR (Crl. ), 762. At this juncture, learned State counsel has stated at bar that he has no objection in setting aside the impugned order and if trial Court be directed to decide the application under Section 319 Cr. P. C after concluding the cross examination of complainant namely Harjit Singh. So, in view of the above circumstances, order dated 19.4.2007, Annexure P9 and order dated 27.11.2007 Annexure P10, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar has been set aside and the trial Court is directed to decide the application under Section 319 Cr. P.C after cross examination of Harjit Singh. Needless to say that petitioner is at liberty to raise all the points CRM No. M-5346 of 2008 2 at the time of deciding the application under Section 319 Cr. P. C. Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court on 24.3.2009. March 2, 2009 ( K. C. Puri ) mamta Judge