IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 26.11.2010 COCP No.2176 of 2010 (O&M) Jagbir Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus Ram Pal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The petitioners claim to be proprietors and owners of the land in view of the judgment of Full Bench of this Court reported as Jai Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2003 (2) PLR 658. The grievance of the petitioners is that the mutation, which has been sanctioned in favour of Gram Panchayat is required to be annulled in view of the Full Bench judgment, but the said judgment has not been given effect to in the revenue record and, therefore, the respondents are in contempt. The question; whether the land vests in Gram Panchayat or not, is a mixed question of law and facts. Liberty has been given in the Full Bench judgment itself to the affected persons to establish their right before the Collector in terms of the provisions of Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961. In view of the said fact, I do not find that any ground for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Dismissed. 26.11.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE