'./ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3333 of 2004 K. Sahu, aged aboyt 5Q years, S/o. Rarwu Sahu, C/o. B.V. Deshmukh, Q.No.MtG-ll, A- 2, 73/7, Nehru Nagar (W), Bhilai, Di^t. Durg (Chhattisgarh). Versus 1. Regionat Provident Fund Commissioner, Press CompSex, Rajbandha Maidan, Raspur, P.0. & Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2. Empioye^ ProviGlent Fand Comtnissioner. E.P.F.O. Regional Office, D.K. Block, Section-11, Salt Lake, Kolkatta 700091. 3. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., through General Manager, Bhilai, Unit P.0., BhJSai, Distt. Durg (CG). (Writ Petition under Artiefe 226/227 ofthe Constitution of fridia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Raju Present: Mr. B.R.Ghosh,, counseS for the petittoner. Mr. Prsaieep Saxena, counsel forthe r^pond^ite No. 1 and 2. ORAL ORDBR (Passed on this 8th day of September, 2008) Mr. Saxena, leamed counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 submits that faimiiy pension amount to the tune ©fRs.32,300/- wlth interest has aiready been paid to the petitioner by cheque bearing hto. 436311 dated 28-9-2002. 2) Per contra, Mr. Ghosh, ieamed counsef appearing for the petitioner submite that the petitsoner has not received ttw said ^heqve till date. 3) Mr. Saxena woutd further submit that if ttw afwesaid cheque has not been recejved, the same shall be tesuecf agair» and the petitioner may make It convenient to come to t-he office and collectthe same. 4) In view of the foregoing, according to fhe leamed coimsel appearing for the petitsoner, notMng survives in this matter. 5) Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. ConseqiNntly, pending appliGations, if any, also stand disposed oi Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge