A-41 % 12.7.2011 Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. + CM (M) No.762/2011 * The order impugned before this Court is the order dated 23.4.2011. The applicant is defendant No.1 in the trial court. Record shows that on 25.1.2011 on a petition having been preferred by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the impugned order dated 3.5.2010 passed by the trial court closing the right of the applicant to cross examine the plaintiff's witnesses had been set aside; vide this order dated 25.1.2011 the petitioner/defendant No.1 had been granted two opportunities to produce his entire evidence at his own responsibility before the trial court. Contention before the court today is that on the next date before the trial court i.e. 25.3.2011 the court was on leave and on second date on 23.4.2011 the impugned order had been passed; by that order further opportunity to cross examine the plaintiff's witnesses had been closed. Record shows that the order of the High Court dated 25.1.2011 had specifically imposed a responsibility upon the applicant to produce his evidence at his own responsibility. No efforts have been made by the applicant/defendant No.1 to disclose to the court that the witnesses of the plaintiff had to be summoned Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified by him in terms of the order of the High Court dated 25.1.2011; it is clear that the petitioner/applicant himself has himself flouted the order of the High Court; he has shown no sense of responsibility. Impugned order calls for no interference Dismissed. IN DERMEET KAUR, J. JULY 12, 2011 mm