IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16107 of 2008 Between: Jella Nagarjuna S/o. Anjaiah R/o. H.No. 6-1-2/B29/1, Boyawada, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Director, Survey & Land Record Spurthi Bhavan, R.R. District, Collectorate, II Floor Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Dy.Collector & Tahsildar (MRO) Saroornagar Manal, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Special Court, Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) II Floor, BRKR Complex, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. S. Satyavathi W/o. Chalapathi Reddy R/o. Flat No. 103/34, Jaya Apartments, HUDAd Complex, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondent No.2 herein in submitting the report by identifying Plot No. 79 in SY.No. 64 of Mansoorabad Village of Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District is bad arbitrary illegal, unjust and against to the principles of natural justice by setting aside lr.no. B/1882/2007 dt. 22-1-2008 of the Respondent No.2 herein and consequently direct the 1st Respondent herein for ordering re-survey in connected with the above said plot. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.VENKATESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Order: By this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the report submitted by the 2nd respondent, namely the Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Saroornagar Mandal, to the 3 rd respondent, namely the Registrar, Special Court under the A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, in Lr.No.B/1882/2007 dated 22.1.2008 identifying plot No.79 in Sy.No.64 of Mansoorabad Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and consequently direct the 1st respondent to order re-survey. The plots in respect of which survey was conducted, are subject matter of litigation before the Land Grabbing Court in L.G.C.No.48 of 2007 and during the course of proceedings, as per the directions given by the Land Grabbing Court, notice was issued by the 3rd respondent calling upon the 2nd respondent to submit report, and it is in terms thereof, the 2nd respondent submitted the report. In fact, this is evident from the reference cited in the report, which refers to the notice issued by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent. When this Court pointed out to the counsel that the report submitted by the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent is not ﬁnal and it is always open to him to ﬁle his objections thereto before the Land Grabbing Court where the case is pending, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, granting him liberty to ﬁle his objections to the report in the proceedings that are pending before the Land Grabbing Court. Accordingly, as prayed for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to ﬁle his objections to the impugned report, if he is aggrieved thereby. N.V.RAMANA,J Msv Dt.25.7.2008 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Assistant Director, Survey & Land Record Spurthi Bhavan, R.R. District, Collectorate, II Floor Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Dy.Collector & Tahsildar (MRO) Saroornagar Manal, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Special Court, Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) II Floor, BRKR Complex, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 4 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 5 2CD copies