IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 20899 of 2008 Between: P.R. Reddanna, S/o. Late Basi Reddy, R/o. CISF Unit, HPCL, Vizag, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PET IT IONER AND 1 The Deputy Commandant, HPCL, Vizag, 2 The Group Commandant, CISF Group, Head Quarters, Hyderabad. 3 The Director General, CISF, Head Quarters, Block No. 13, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. .....RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring action of the respondents in not considering petitioner representation dt. 15-08-2008 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and without authority of law consequently direct thenot to insist the petitioner to proceed on transfer vide his movement order dt. 25-8-2008 or pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SHIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.20899 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation purported to have been ﬁled by the petitioner on 15.8.2008 as arbitrary and illegal. It appears, when the petitioner was transferred from Visakhapatnam to CISF Unit ONGC, Nazira, he ﬁled W.P.No.10507 of 2007 before this Court. However, the said writ petition was dismissed by order dated 14.8.2008. When the petitioner pleaded that his health does not permit him to go to such long distances and atleast his request may be considered, this Court permitted the petitioner to make a representation in this regard after jointing the station to which he was transferred. The learned counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner is not in a position to undertake such long journeys and therefore the respondents may be directed to consider his representation dated 15.8.2008. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation purported to have been made by the petitioner on 15.8.2008 and pass appropriate orders taking into consideration of the physical condition of the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders, as per law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 23.9.2008 Note: Issue C.C. in (3) days. B/o DA THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.20899 of 2008 23.9.2008