IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 26331 of 2007 Between: Smt.Maddela Dhanalakshmi, W/o Bangaru Raju, Plot No.5, Srinivasa Nagar, Srikakulam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Sub-Registrar of Assurances (Stamps & Registration) Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat Buildings, AP Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to receive the Sale Deed dated 18-10-2007 executed by the petitioner in favour of Mrs.Polavarapu Srilakshmi with respect to the property of 300 sq.yards bearing Plot No.C-68 in VUDA layout, S.No.313/P, Kapula Uppada, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam and deal with the said Sale Deed in accordance with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Rules made thereunder and to pass such other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Order: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that even though she purchased the plot in question in the auction conducted by the Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority (VUDA) vide registered sale deed dated 16.9.2003, and as she wanted to sell the same, she executed sale deed and when she presented the same, the 1st respondent refused to receive the same for registration. This Court while admitting the writ petition on 11.12.2007 directed the 1st respondent to receive the sale deed to be presented by the petitioner for registration and process the same in accordance with the Rules and Regulations. It was also directed that if the 1st respondent has any objection for the registration, he may record the reasons and communicate the same to the petitioner forthwith. Today, when the matter is taken up, the District Collector as well as the Sub-Registrar appeared in pursuance of the directions of this Court dated 7.2.2008 and stated that they have received the document submitted by the petitioner and registered the same. The said fact has been admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. It is accordingly closed. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.21.2.2008 msv