IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10361 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ TRAVANCORE RUBBERS LTD., KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.P.A.EAPEN BY ADV. SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AA) OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM. BY G.P. SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH WPC NO.10458/2008 ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) Nos.10361 & 10458 of 2008 .................................................................... Dated this the 27th day of March, 2008. JUDGMENT Since the amount involved in the conditional stay orders is very small, there is no scope for interfering with the conditional stay orders. The petitioner's apprehension is that for subsequent years the amount is going to be high. I do not think the probable grievance for subsequent years will be justification to interfere with the impugned orders issued for earlier period. The W.Ps. are therefore closed leaving freedom to the petitioner to challenge the orders issued for subsequent period, if petitioner has any grievance. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms