IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9379 of 2009 1. RAM PRASAD @ RAM PRASAD YADAV,son of Rohan Yadav 2. Mahesh Yadav,son of Ram Prasad Yadav 3. Khagia Devi,wife of Ram Prasad Yadav 4. Manju Devi,Daughter of Ram Prasad Yadav 5. Anita Devi,wife of Mahesh Yadav All residents of village Deothika,P.S.- Fatehpur, District-Gaya. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.11327 of 2009 SITARAM PRASAD,son of Ram Prasad Yadav,resident of village-Beothika,P.S.- Fatehpur,District-Gaya. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 13-04-2009 As both these cases arise out of the same complaint case number, they are heard together. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that marriage is of the year 1994. Differences may be there and torture also but should be some cause for the same. In the present case dowry has been shown as the main cause followed by another marriage of the husband in the year 2000, even then the demand continued followed by assault and ousting of the complainant. Further submission is that a petition for restitution of conjugal life has also been filed. In my view also, it is not a case of 498A that marriage was in the year 1994 and next marriage with another girl in the year 2000, even then complainant remained with in-laws and ousted in the year 2008 and all the time dowry continued making allegation against parents, brothers, sisters-in-law(Gotani and Nanad). Accordingly, these petitions for anticipatory bail are 2 allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No.1504/2008(Tr.No.1778/2008), the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )