IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.419 OF 2010 Between : Pilli Venkanna .... PETITIONER A N D Pilli Nookalamma. …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.419 OF 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the docket order, dated 03.11.2009, in I.A.No.467 of 2009 in O.P.No.603 of 2007 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to direct the Garnishee to record the name of the respondent herein / petitioner as nominee in the service record of the petitioner to receive Provident Fund, Gratuity, Death-cum-service benefits including retirement benefits of her husband, was allowed. 2. Today, this Court dismissed C.R.P.No.542 of 2010 filed against the order, dated 01.04.2009 in I.A.No.97 of 2009 in the above suit, filed to direct the petitioner/husband to record name of respondent as nominee to receive the benefits. The order impugned in this revision is only a consequential order to the said order. 3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed confirming the docket order, dated 03.11.2009 in I.A.No.467 of 2009 in O.P.No.603 of 2007 subject to the observations made in the order in CRP No. 542 of 2010. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J FEBRUARY 24, 2011. YVL