1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Mahaveer & Anr. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 290/2006 against the order dated 12-8-2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raisinghnagar, district Sri Ganganagar, in Criminal Case No. 125/2005. ... Date of Order: August 02, 2006 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. N.L. Joshi, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order dated 12.8.2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raisinghnagar, district Sri Ganganagar (for short, “the trial Court” hereinafter) in Criminal Case No. 125/2005, whereby the trial Court took cognizance of the offences under Sections 419, 420,, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B, IPC and issued process against the petitioners. On careful perusal of the order impugned, in my view, the trial Court was justified in taking the cognizance of the 2 offences as also issuing process against the present petitioners. Keeping in view the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jgdish Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan, AIR 2004 SC 1734, in my view, no case for interference in the inherent jurisdiction is made out. The criminal miscellaneous petition is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs