Cr.MP(M) No. 524 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. H.C. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Cr.MP(M) No. 524 of 2011 Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. List on 19th July, 2011. In the meantime, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No. 7/2010, with Police Station SV & ACV, Shimla under Sections 468, 469, 471 IPC. The petitioner shall report at the aforesaid Police Station on 15th July, 2011 at 10 AM and on all further dates as directed. It is further directed that: (a) The petitioner shall not interfere or tamper with the prosecution evidence or in any manner try to overawe or influence the prosecution witnesses; (b) The petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ` 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer; (c) The petitioner shall not abscond from the jurisdiction of learned Sesssions Judge, Una. List the matter on 19th July, 2011. Dasti copy on usual terms. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge Cr.MMO 114 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Jyotsana Rewal Dua, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Cr.MMO 114 of 2011 Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is not substantiated from the record that application for exemption filed has not been taken on record. I am not inclined to accept the reasons as given in this petition for not taking the application on record. All that I can say is that it taxes my credibility as to how an application which is presented in Court is not taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made a number of submissions which I do not accept including the fact that on 18th June, 2011, non-bailable warrants were issued against the petitioner herein despite the fact that he was in the toilet in the Court premises due to some stomach problem. Again I am amazed that even the Advocate present could not submit before the learned Court for a short pass over. However, taking into consideration the facts of the case, a direction is issued to the learned trial Court that in case any application for exemption is filed by the petitoner herein the same shall be taken on record and dispose it of in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge Cr.MMO 115 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Jyotsana Rewal Dua, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Cr.MMO 115 of 2011 Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is not substantiated from the record that application for exemption filed has not been taken on record. I am not inclined to accept the reasons as given in this petition for not taking the application on record. All that I can say is that it taxes my credibility as to how an application which is presented in Court is not taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made a number of submissions which I do not accept including the fact that on 18th June, 2011, non-bailable warrants were issued against the petitioner herein despite the fact that he was in the toilet in the Court premises due to some stomach problem. Again I am amazed that even the Advocate present could not submit before the learned Court for a short pass over. However, taking into consideration the facts of the case, a direction is issued to the learned trial Court that in case any application for exemption is filed by the petitoner herein the same shall be taken on record and dispose it of in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge Cr. Revision No. 122 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms.Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for respondent No.2. Let record of the Courts below be called for so as to reach this Court on or before 20th July, 2011. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge Exe. Petition 13 of 2009 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocate vice Mr.Bimal Gupta, Advocate, for the Decree Holder. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, for the Judgment Debtor. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, learned counsel, submits that he has no instructions on behalf of the Judgment Debtors. Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw from the case. Permission granted. OMP No. 144 of 2010 was instituted by the Decree Holder calling upon the Judgment Debtors to disclose their assets. I find no compliance of the directions issued by this Court, rather what I find is that they have evaded the process of this Court. Let notice be issued to the Judgment Debtors calling upon them to disclose their assets in terms of Order 21 Rule 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The notice shall indicate that in case of non-compliance, the Judgment Debtors shall be liable to be detained in civil prison. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr. Revision No. 114 of 2010 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl.A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for respondent No.2. List alongwith Cr. Revision No. 113 of 2010. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 346 of 2010 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Mr. Puneet Rajta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for respondent No.7. Record received. List next week, as prayed for. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 500 of 2010 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate vice Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent Nos 2 and 3. CMP(M) No. 1519 of 2010 Heard. For the reasons stated in this application, I am satisfied that delay in filing the appeal is bonafide. This application is accordingly allowed and delay in instituting the appeal is condoned in the interest of justice. Application stands disposed of. FAO No. 500 of 2010 Rejected, vide separate order of even date. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Exe. Petition 2 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for the Decree Holder. None for the Judgment Debtors. Let necessary steps for the representation to the estate of deceased Judgment Debtors No. 3 and 4 be taken within a period of four weeks from today. Report of the Registry shows that warrant of attachment of property of Judgment Debtor No. 1 has been received back duly executed. Let appropriate steps for sale be taken by the Decree Holder. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MP(M) No. 497 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty reserved to move fresh application in accordance with law either before this Court or before the learned trial Court. Permission granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MP(M) No. 499 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. List on 18th July, 2011 as prayed for by the learned Additional Advocate General. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MP(M) No. 502 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl.A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty reserved to move fresh application in accordance with law either before this Court or before the learned trial Court. Permission granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr. MP(M) No. 503 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty reserved to move fresh application in accordance with law eithe r before this Court or before the learned trial Court. Permission granted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 4 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. Let record be called for immediately. List thereafter. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 417 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate,for the appellant. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.7. Heard in part. At the request made on behalf of Mr. S.C. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the case is adjourned for two weeks in order to enable the learned counsel to take instructions in the matter. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 410 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: None for the appellant. Mr. S.C.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.7 Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent Nos 1 to 3 and 5. List alongwith FAO No. 417 of 2008. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), (ms) Judge FAO No. 242 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. FAO No. 242 of 2011 Notice be issued to the respondent. Let record of the Court below be called for. List immediately on receipt of record. CMP No. 467 of 2011 Notice. Reply, if any, be filed before the next date. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr. Revision No. 118 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G., for the respondent. Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the State. Let record of the Court below be called for. List immediately on receipt of record. July 14, 2011(ms) (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge Cr.MMO 111 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Advocate, for the petitioner. List before another Bench at the pleasure of Hon’ble the Chief Justice. (Dev Darshan Sud), July 14, 2011(ms) Judge Cr.MMO 113 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. S.D. Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for respondent No.1. List in the first week of August, 2011 as prayed for. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MMO 106 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for respondent No.1. Record received. List before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. (Dev Darshan Sud), July 14, 2011(ms) Judge Cr.MP(M) No. 504 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Cr.MP(M) No. 504 of 2011 Notice. Learned Deputy Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. List on 18th July, 2011. In the meantime, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No. 18 of 2011, dated 11.3.2011 registered with Police Station Bhareri, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur under Sections 504, 509 and 506 IPC. The petitioner shall report at Police Station, Bhareri on 13th July, 2011 at 1 PM and on all further dates as directed. It is further directed that the he shall not interfere or tamper with the prosecution evidence or in any manner try to overawe or influence the prosecution witnesses. List on 18th July, 2011. Dasti copy on usual terms. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MMO 98 of 2010 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. Pushpender Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Arguments heard. Judgment reserved. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Exe. Petition 29 of 2010 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the Decree Holder. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the Judgment Debtor. List on 18th July, 2011 as prayed for by the learned Additional Advocate General. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 354 of 2007 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsara, Advocate, for the appellant. None for the respondents. CMP No. 468 of 2011 The matter already stands decided by the Lok Adalat on 31st July, 2010. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the enhanced amount of ` 40,000/- stands deposited by the Insurance Company. Application allowed. Let the enhanced amount be released and remitted to the bank account of the applicant, particulars whereof have been given in the application. Application stands disposed of. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge FAO No. 372 of 2005 14.7.2011 Present: None for the parties. Notices issued to the appellant witnesses have not been received back. List before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CMPMO 283 of 2009 14.7.2011 Present: None for the parties. List before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP No. 434 of 2007 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent No. 5 has been filed. Request for adjournment on behalf of Mr. Rajiv Jiwan is made on the ground that he is out of station because of the death in his relation at Delhi. I find _____most unfortunate that despite a specific order having been passed by this Court to respondent No. 3 to present in Court with record, but despite the fact that on 3rd May, 2011 the Member Secretary of the Himachal Pradesh State Commission for Women was present and stated that the Advocate General represents the Commission and assits this Court with record. I find that neither the Deputy Advocate General accepting such representation nor the record has been produced before this Court. On 15.6.2011 I had noticed that there was no representation on behalf of the H.P. State Commission for Women and the learned Deputy Advocate General did not accept the responsibility for such representation. Notice was directed to be issued to the Commission. Despite such notice having been issued, compliance report has not been placed on record. In these circumstances, I direct that the Member Secretary of the Commission or any responsible person who can answer the questions of this Court shall be present on each and every date when this petition is taken up for hearing. A direction is issued that in the first instance, the case shall be listed on 2nd August, 2011. The record be also produced for the inspection of this Court, failing which this Court shall be compelled to issue contemptuous process against the responsible officer of the Commission. Let a copy of this order be conveyed to respondent No. 3 as also the Advocate General. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MP(M) No. 224 of 2011 14.7.2011 Present: Shri Anup Chitkara, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. for the respondent. Notice be issued to the respondent. Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. The petitioner is directed to report the Police Station, Rampur Bushehr on 2nd April, 2011 at 10 AM. In the meantime, the petitioner shall not be arrested. It is directed that the petitioner shall not interfere with the investigation of the case or in any manner try to overawe or influence the prosecution witnesses or obstruct the progress of the investigation. The petitioner shall also furnish a personal bond in the sum of ` 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He shall not abscond from the jurisdiction of the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushehr. Other conditions shall be considered at the time when this petition is taken up for hearing. List on 5th April, 2011. One submission made by the learned Additional Advocate General is that the petitioner is fugitive from justice, having been denied bail by the trial Court and even today he is not present. Before taking into consideration this submission, let a detailed affidavit be filed by the Investigating Officer as to what action has been taken from the date when the bail was rejected till date. Dasti copy on usual terms. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.Revision 179 of 2004 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl.A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for respondent No. 1. Argument heard. Judgment reserved. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge Cr.MMO 112 of 2006 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for respondent No.1. Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Ramakant Shama, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Heard in part. List on 4th April, 2011. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 5901 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan Deputy A.G. for the respondent. Heard in part. List on 4th April, 2011 for further hearing. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 7431 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondent. The petitioner is not represented. Consequently Mr. Chandel, is appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist this Court. List the case on 13th December, 2010. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 7427 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for the respondent. The petitioner is not represented. Mr. Lokender Thakur, learned counsel, is appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist this Court. List on 9th December, 2010. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP (T) No. 7421 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Shri Ranjan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for the respondent. The case of the petitioner in nutshell is that he was working in the department of respondent No. 3 and retired after the completion of 23 years of service. However, his service has been terminated without issuing any show cause notice to him on 7th March, 2001. The case of the respondent- State precisely is that the petitioner was appointed as daily waged driver. However, the State-respondent has not placed on record any material to prove that the petitioner was ever served with a notice to resume his identity. Consequently, taking into consideration the period of service rendered by the petitioner, the petitioner will ask/serve the State to consider his case by the respondent sympathetically within one month from today. The compliance affidavit be filed within three weeks thereafter. List the case on 7th January, 2011. Dasti copy on usual terms. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 7419 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. M.G. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for the respondent. It has come in reply that the petitioner is having 40% disability to his blindness. It may be true that respondent No. 4 has been appointed as part time employee. However, the fact of the matter is that the case of the petitioner is also required to be considered sympathetically taking into consideration that disability factor. Accordingly, respondent No. 1 is directed to reconsider the case of the petitioner if the post of part time sweeper is available in the respondent department. In view of this, this writ petition is disposed of. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 8487 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondent. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list after two weeks. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) 8422 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondent. The present petition has become infructuous, since the petitioner stands retired. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 8371 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Madhu Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Sharma Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondent. The present petition has been filed seeking benefit of service w.e.f. 10th June, 1971 to 1.9.1973 after adhoc service. The benefit of adhoc service cannot be counted as per the reply filed by the respondent and the same has been counted for the purpose of increment. It is evident from Annexure R-1 that the petitioner was initially appointed as J.B. T. teacher and thereafter he was regularized. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition. Petition stands dismissed. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 8313 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondents. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, list on 9th December, 2010. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 8312 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. and Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the respondents. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, list after two weeks. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 8307 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. Raj Negi, Advocate vice Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondent. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, list after winter vacations. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 8219 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Rajana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondent. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, list after two weeks. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) 8172 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt.A.G. for the respondent. List on 9th December, 2010, as prayed for. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 7859 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Rajana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the respondent, list on 14th December, 2010. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 6190 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Hem Lata, Advocate vice Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate, for the respondent. At the request of learned counsel appearing for the respondent, list on 9th December, 2010. July 14, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge CWP(T) No. 9889 of 2008 14.7.2011 Present: Ms. Rajana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. At the request of learned counsel