IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18190 of 2011 Ram Pravesh Kumar Versus Mosomat Sita Devi & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 04.11.201 1 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the fact that the appeal against the Judgment has already been dismissed by the First Appellate Court and then the High Court and also the Supreme Court. The executing Court is not passing any order on the application filed by the petitioner on 05.03.2011. Specific statement has been made at paragraph 31 that the Sub Judge 4th Patna is not passing any order regarding the application filed by the petitioner on 05.03.2011 praying for recovery of possession of the suit premises. From perusal of the certified copy of ordersheet produced at the time of hearing, it appears that the application was filed by the decree holder without supported by any affidavit and, therefore the Court directed the petitioner to file affidavit in support of the said application by terms of order dated 23.04.2011. Thereafter, there is nothing on record to show that the Court below is passing any adjournment in a routine manner. At paragraph 32 of the writ application, it has been stated that the Judgment debtor is taking delaying tactics and is not allowing the Court to pass any order. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case no such direction can be passed directing the Court to dispose of the execution case No.2 of 1991 within any specific period. However, since the execution case appears to be of the year 1991, the Court may try to dispose of the same as early as possible. With this observation, this writ application is disposed of. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)