{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8659 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1975 OF 1995 Ganpat Hiraman Chavan APPLICANT VERSUS Sanjay Gabaji Sonar & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.P.B.Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr.P.S.Dighe h/f Mr.N.B.Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioners Mr.N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent / State Mr.A.S.Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.15 ....... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9741 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1975 OF 1995 Satish Walmik Patil APPLICANT VERSUS Sanjay Gabaji Sonar & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.M.A.Thorbole, Advocate for applicant Mr.P.S.Dighe h/f Mr.N.B.Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioners Mr.N.N.Jadhav, AGP for respondent / State Mr.A.S.Shelke, Advocate for respondent No.15 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 29th September 2009 PER COURT: {2} 1. Both these applications can be decided by this common order. Pursuant to the revenue record being tendered in this Court, these applications have been filed by the applicants seeking copies of the mutation entries etc. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed with no order as to costs. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/ca8659-09