IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR: CH HATTISGARH §§€€i5 $E§£€m w.P. No.0?é4/ OF 2006 Petitioners 1. V.P. Dhanre, aged about 47 years, V, Slo Punalikram, Head Master, Middle School Ganiyari, Tehsil —- x“ Kata, Distt Biiaspur (Chhattisgarh) 2: Prahlad Singh Dhruvahshi,aged /about 56 years, S/o Umendiai, Teacher, Primary School, Devsara, V Tehsii ~Pandaria Distt Kabirdham 3. Mahesh Dutt Sharma, aged about 69 ./ years, S/o Kapiinath Sharma, Retired Teacher, R/o Durjaband Para, Pandaria, Tehsii - Pandaria, Dist Kabirdham (CG) 4 Parmaram Shyam, aged about 65 ,years, S/o ArP. Shyam, Retired / \./ Teacher, R/o Viiiage —— Karipani, Pos- Kharganaha,, Tehsii& Distt. Dindori (MP) presently residing at Sharma House, mahamaya Chowk, Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (CG) Bhagwan Das, Andhwan, aged War about 72 years, S/o Nidandas, Retired Teacher, Village — Cheerpani, Tehsil ~Pandaria, Distt Kabirdham (CG) 6. Shivsingh Dhurve, aged about 66 x /’ years, S/o Tihar Singh’, Retired Teacher, R/o Village -Cheerpani, Tehsil — Pandaria, Distt. Kabirdham 7. xHemsingh Narte, aged about 65 / years, S/o Hiraram Narte, Retired Teacher, Present Address - DeVsara, Tehsil ~Pandaria, Distt Kabirdham (CG) Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through ‘//the Collector, Distt. Kabirdham (CG) 2. District Coordinator, SC/ST Welfare / Department, Distt Kabirdham (CG) 3. The Secretary, Madhya Pradesh v‘Vanvasi Seva Mandal, Distt. Mandla (MP) @J 4 Department Co‘ordinator, Sub " x 1"VA'Qffice, Vanvasi Seva Manda], kapil Nagar. Sarkanda, Bilaspyr (CG) 5p; AdditionalCommissioner, , Tribal Development Department , Ravishankar University Premises, ‘Raipur (CG) ' 6. Asstt. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deptt. Composite v Building, Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE i CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mmmm 12T67§663 . Shri' Ranbir Singh, Advocate a! Singhai, Advocate for the petitioners. ,, Shri, Satish Gupta, Depu State/respondents No.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6. Hear‘d both the counseL' ' The grievance of the petitioners not being paid arrears of Centrai Scal also served notice under Section 80 (1 Learned coun'sel for the petition not being decided by respondents. in may be allowed to make a detailed rep he be directed to decide representa respondents has no objection. 4 Having heard learned counsel f .the facts and circumstances of the ci make a detailed representation to the 3~weeks and in turn respondent No.5 of the petitioners within a period of 6‘ representation after considering ail petitioners, in accordance with law. . With the direction aforesaid, the )pears on behalf of Miss Sharmila ty Govt. AdVo‘cate for the in this writ petition is that they are e. Before filing of this petition, they i of the CPC. ers submitted that representation is the circumstances. the petitioners resentation to respondent No.5 and. tion to which learned counsel for 3r the parties and having regard to tse, the petitioners are allowed to respondent No.5 within a period of ‘s directed to decide representation imonths from the date of receipt o ‘ the grievances raised by the petitionistands disposed of. Parties are entitied fo'r certified c opy of this order. Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge New l f