IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2011 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28920 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- S.SREELEKHA, AGED 43, `GOKULAM' NEAR S.V.M., PEYAD, MALAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR. R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) MR. PRASANTH M.P RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA STATE GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES (GROUND WATER), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. E. M. ABDUL KHADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(c) 28920 OF 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL REPORT DATED 27.11.2003 EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (MS) NO. 11/2010/WRD DATED 01.02.2010 EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05.03.2010 SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02.08.2011 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No . 28920 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 31st day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as CLR in the District Office of the Ground Water Department, Thiruvananthapuram from March 1995. The case of the petitioner is that, by virtue of the credentials of the petitioner her service is liable to be regularized as SLR worker in view of the various orders issued by the Government enabling such an exercise. 2. It is also the case of the petitioner that the claim of the petitioner is recommended by the first respondent vide Ext. P3, which has been forwarded to the 3rd respondent. The petitioner has already preferred Ext. P4 representation before the 3rd respondent to extend the relief sought for and the same is still to be finalized, which made the petitioner to approach this Court. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P4, in the light of Ext. P3 and such other relevant materials. The proceedings as above shall be finalized as W.P. (C) No. 28920 of 2011 : 2 : expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the Writ Petition before the third respondent for further steps. Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd