1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (CONTEMPT JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.995 OF 2009 ************ L.Santhoshkumar, S/o.A.Lourdhusamy, No.10,Santhosh Medical (Near Railway Gate) Kurinchipadi & Post, Cuddalore District - 607 302. .. Petitioner vs. 1.Arumugam Manager Indian Bank Kurinchippadi Branch Cuddalore District – 607 302 2.K.Muthukaruppaiah Regional Manager Indian Bank Regional Office No.4, Bharathi Road AVR Tower, Cuddalore .. Respondents Contempt Petition praying that this Court be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 30/07/2009 and made in W.P.No.446 of 2009. The above Contempt Petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr.S.Mahaveer Shivaji, Advocate for the petitioner herein; and of Mr.V.Kalyanaraman, Advocate for the respondents herein; and upon reading the petition and affidavit of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 L.Santhosh Kumar, filed herein; the Court made the following order:- This contempt petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court, dated 30.7.2009, made in W.P.No.446 of 2009. 2. The writ petition, in W.P.No.446 of 2009, is relating to the sanction of educational loan for M.B.B.S. course, which the petitioner is said to be pursuing at Aarupadai Veedu Medical College and Hospital, Pondicherry, under the Gyan Jothi Education Loan Scheme. 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that even though the loan had been sanctioned by the respondents, it had been sanctioned only from the third year of the M.B.B.S. Course, instead of from the second year of the M.B.B.S. Course, being pursued by the petitioner. However, it has not been shown that there was a specific direction from this Court to sanction the loan to the petitioner, including the second year of the M.B.B.S. course. Further, this Court had directed the respondents to grant the loan subject to the norms, regulations and the rules applicable to the granting of such loan. The petitioner has not been in a position to show that the respondents had wilfully disobeyed the order of this Court, dated 30.7.2009, made in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 W.P.No.446 of 2009. In such circumstances, this Court does not find sufficient cause or reason to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the said order, as prayed for in the contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition stands dismissed. No costs. Witness the Hon'ble Thiru M.YUSUF EQBAL, The Chief Justice of High Court at Madras, as aforesaid, this the 28th day of June, 2010. SD/- DEPUTY REGISTRAR (OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2010. COURT OFFICER (O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the orders/judgments/Decrees in this format. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4 Cns. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.995/2009 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN ORDER DATED : 28/06/2010 FOR APPROVAL :23/11/2010 APPROVED ON :24/11/2010 Copy to: 1.Arumugam Manager Indian Bank Kurinchippadi Branch Cuddalore District – 607 302 2.K.Muthukaruppaiah Regional Manager Indian Bank Regional Office No.4, Bharathi Road AVR Tower, Cuddalore https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/