IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15084 of 2009 OM PRAKASH S/O RAMDEO SINGH, R/O LACHHI KAITAKA, P.S.- AMNAUR, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.DEP.VIGI. ----------- 2 08/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Vigilance. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner was apprehended while accepting Rs. 12,000/- as bribe. The post trap memorandum and pre trap memorandum confirm the payment and receipt. Submission is that the post trap memorandum does not show that the petitioner has demanded the money. Pre trap memorandum and post trap memorandum are indicative of the fact of payment and realization of money. Considering the allegations, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail presently. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in the learned court below if the trial is not concluded within one year. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)