IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. 62341 of 2011 and CRM-M No. 31074 of 2011 Date of Decision: 16.11.2011 Laxmi Devi and others ...... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ... ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.R.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.Preeti Choudhary, AAG, Haryana. Ms.Kamaljeet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CRM No. 62341 of 2011 CRM allowed. Reply by way of affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.2 filed. Taken on record. CRM-M No. 31074 of 2011 The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of F.I.R. No.173 dated 20.4.2011, registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak and consequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Om Parkash, has accepted that a valid compromise has been effected between the parties. The compromise is voluntary and without any pressure. Broad guidelines have been laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another reported in 2007(3) R.C.R. (Crl.) 1052 for quashing the prosecution when parties entered into compromise. Consequently, this petition is allowed. The F.I.R. No.173 dated 20.4.2011, registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak along with all consequent proceedings arising therefrom is quashed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 16, 2011 sunita