In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-27171 of 2008 (O&M) Balwinder Singh ..... Petitioner vs Ajit Singh Chahal and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the orders dated 14.8.2007 and 1.9.2008 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat and Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, respectively, whereby the complaint filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The dispute originates from a civil litigation where according to the petitioner, he had interim stay in his favour, but inspite of that, Nishan Sahib which was existing on the land in dispute was uprooted by the respondents which resulted in commission of offence under Sections 295/295-A/297/298 read with Section 34 IPC. However, both the courts below did not find favour with the contentions raised by the petitioner as he had not been able to prove on record that the object which was allegedly uprooted by the respondents, was a place of worship as from the photographs on record it was like a small flag standing in a field with crop of sarson grown there. Even otherwise for violation of any interim order the petitioner had the remedy under the civil law. It could not be proved that the site in question was being used for any religious purpose. There was no independent evidence except the self serving evidence of the petitioner as the statement of Nav Rattan (CW2) was not found to be trustworthy. After considering the contentions raised by the petitioner and also the evidence led, I do not find any reason to interfere with the orders passed by the learned courts below in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr. P.C. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. 1.7.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge