$-73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 783/2011 A JAY VERMA & ORS. Petitioners Through Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil Magon, Mr. Manish, Advs. With petitioners in person. versus STATE NOT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Akshay Bipin, Additional Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State. Mr. Shersingh, Insp. PS Economic Offices Wing. Mr. Bishwant Singh, Adv. for R-2 With R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 27.05.2011 W.P.rCRL) 783/2011 & Crl.M.A. 6476/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 91/2011 under Sections 406/420/120-B IPC registered at PS Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2 as a special power of attorney of Respondent No. 3. The allegations as set out in the FIR are that the Respondent No,3 and her husband were lured by the Petitioners for purchasing two units F-07 and F-08 in SEWA Corporate Park at Sewa W.P.(CRL)783/2011 page 1 of 3 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified Corporate Mall at MG Road, Gurgaon. The Respondent No.2 & 3 hired the services of a lawyer who has advised her to take no objection from M/S A.B. Multiples Private Ltd. Then without taking the no objection the Petitioners confirmed to the Respondent No.3 that they have taken no objection certificate from M/S A.B. Multiples Private Ltd. After delivery of the cheque whenever the Respondent No.3 enquired about the status of the property, the Petitioners sought extension on one pretext or the other. Despite assurance, neither the possession of the property nor the money was handed over back. After the registration of FIR, the parties have entered into a settlement. The original special power of attorney in favour of Respondent No. 2 issued by the Respondent No. 3 is taken on record and is marked as Ex.'C. Petitioners No. 1 & 3 are also present in person and the Petitioner No.2 is appearing through her special power of attorney, copy whereof is also taken on record. Respondent No.2 states that the parties have entered into a settlement and in terms of the settlement the Petitioners are to pay a sum of Rs. 1.13 crores to the Respondent No.3. Out of the said sum, Rs. 50 lakhs has already been paid. Today a pay order for Rs. 63 lakhs bearing No. 917815 W.R(CRL) 783/2011 page 2 of 3 dated26^ May, 2011 drawnonIndianOverseasBankhas beenhandedover. The Respondent No.2 has received the entire payment on behalf of Respondent No.3, and he states that he does not want to pursue above to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 91/2011 under Sections 406/420/120-B IPC registered at PS Economic Offences Wing, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Petitioners who are identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition and the pending application are disposed of. Order dasti. MAY 27, 2011/'ga' W.P.(CRLX783mil MUKTA GUPTA,J page 3 of3 3-7o/gr Vv<^ •. ACy