dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.5898 OF 2008 PETITION NO.5898 OF 2008 PETITION NO.5898 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Pankaj J. Das for the Petitioner. Mr.K.J.Presswala i/by.M/s.Mulla & Mulla & C.B.C. for respondents 1 and 2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 3rd October, 2008. : 3rd October, 2008. : 3rd October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. This is a petition filed by the plaintiff/petitioner for adding M/s.Ameya Builders as party in a Suit against the respondents for injunction as the respondents proposed to demolish the structure in question of the plaintiff. The petitioner’s case is that they are in possession in pursuance to an agreement with M/s.Ameya Builders. The Suit is of the year 1998. Though the averments made but admittedly no reliefs are claimed against defendant no.3. ( 2 ) The submission is that as in written statement there was objection raised that suit be dismissed for want of necessary party i.e. Ameya Builders and, therefore, the petitioner moved this application. The learned counsel for the respondents/contesting defendants makes statement that they are not very much serious about the said objection as admittedly no reliefs against defendant no.3 are claimed. In this background, there is nothing to interfere with the impugned order. The petition is accordingly dismissed. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]