1 APPLN 4293 OF 2010.sxw vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4293 OF 2010. Harkchand Takorwse Chheda .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. M.V. Thorat, for the Applicant. Mr Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 7th October, 2010 P.C. 1. The applicant seeks anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in Crime No.144 of 2010, registered at Tardeo Police Station, Mumbai Central, Mumbai for the offences punishable under Sections 420 r/w 34 of the Indian penal Code. It is alleged that the first informant had reported that one Sushila Gaikwad had received a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with promise to return double the amount. Sushila’s husband Harku is supposed to have received a sum of Rs.l,00,000/- and the applicant is alleged to be Harku. This fact is denied by the applicant. 2. Sushila and present applicant both had filed application NO.3679 pf 2010 before this Court. Sushila Gaikwad was admitted 2 APPLN 4293 OF 2010.sxw to anticipatory bail by order of this Court dated 9.9.2010 and the applicant was allowed to withdraw his claim with liberty to file separate application and accordingly the present application is filed by the applicant. 3. Sushila Gaikwad had allegedly received an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/-. She has been admitted to bail, therefore, there could be no reason to deny bail to present applicant. Learned APP states that there are some other complaints against the applicant. That cannot be a matter which could be considered while deciding present application. In view of this, in the event of applicant’s arrest, he be released on bail on furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.35,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.35,000/-on the following conditions - i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer on 11.10.2010 at 10.00 a.m. and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall also attend the concerned police station on every Sunday till the investigation is over. iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; 3 APPLN 4293 OF 2010.sxw iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) This order shall remain in force till the charge-sheet is filed. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)