1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2285 OF 2008 Nimraj Pandharinath Vispute ...Applicant/Ptnr. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Applicant in person Ms. U.V. Kejriwal, A.P.P CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SHRI. R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 4TH MAY, 2009 P.C. 1. The applicant is appearing in person. He states that he may be permitted to approach Nagpur Bench of this Court. The Criminal Writ Petition No.2285/2008 is in fact disposed of by the Division Bench of this Court (Mr. Bilal Nazki & Mr. Anoop V. Mohta, JJ) on 15th January, 2009. The order passed by the Division Bench runs thus:- “The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she has returned the papers and discharged from appearing in the case as she has no instructions. 2 2. We have perused the file. No case is made out. Even the F.I.R which is the bone of contentions, is under the Police Station of Amaravati District, which is normally taken up by the Nagpur Bench of this Court. 3. In the circumstances, the Petition is dismissed.” 2. The applicant contends that the view of the Bench was that the petition should be filed in the Nagpur Bench of this Court. Hence he may be permitted to file petition in the Nagpur Bench. It is not possible for us to pass any order, because the petition itself is dismissed on merits. He wants that order dated 15th January, 2009 be modified. If it is permissible in law, he may approach the same Bench, if he desires for review or he may adopt any other legal remedy as he may be advised. We have not expressed any opinion on this aspect. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SHRI. R.G. KETKAR, J.)