1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.262 OF 2010 Smt.Shalinibai S. Gaikwad and Ors. .. Appellants Versus Rajkumar S. Gaikwad and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Mahendra Agwekar holding for Mr.Mandar Limaye for appellants. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd March 2010. P.C.: 1] Heard Mr.Limaye for the appellant. Perused the impugned order. This is a second application made for identical reliefs by the appellant original plaintiff. This Court on an earlier occasion has directed expeditious disposal of the suit pending in the trial court. In the impugned order it has been observed by the court below that evidence of the plaintiff has already been recorded. In such a situation and when no changed circumstances were brought on record, the trial court was justified in rejecting the further application for interim relief. There is no reason to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. However, it is clarified that all observations made by the trial court so also in this order are tentative 2 and prima facie and shall not influence the trial court while deciding the suit. Appeal dismissed. Civil application, if any, does not survive and dismissed as such. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)