IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.44234 OF 2010 SATYA NARAIN RAI, SON OF AMIR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUNDERGAMA, POLICE STATION PARSAUNI, DISTRICT SITAMARHI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********** 2 26/03/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 365 and 366 A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the father of Uma Shankar Kumar, who had allegedly kidnapped the victim girl. It is alleged that the petitioner also conspired with his son to kidnap the victim girl. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the father could not have entered into any such conspiracy and could not have condoned such an action of his son. More over, it is also submitted that the petitioner lives in Kolkata and not in the village where the occurrence took place. Counsel for the State submits that the girl is still traceless and in view of the aforesaid fact, the petitioner should not be granted bail. Considering the fact that the main allegation is against Uma Shankar Kumar, the above named petitioner 2 is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today in Parsauni Police Station Case No. 74 of 2008 (G. R. No. 2532 of 2008) on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )