HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.32076 of 2011 Date: 7-12-2011 Between: Gandi Satyanarayana s/o.late Satyanarayana, Visakhapatnam .. Petitioner And A.P. State Financial Corporation, represented by its Authorised Signatory, Visakhapatnam and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Smt. S.A.V. Ratnam for Smt. M. Suguna Counsel for respondents : -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is ﬁled for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in accepting the proposal of the petitioner of paying the liability of respondent No.2, subject to the condition of the mortgaged property of respondent No.2, being transferred in his favour. At the hearing, Smt.S.A.V. Ratnam, learned counsel representing Smt.M. Suguna, the learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly conceded that before ﬁling this Writ Petition, her client has not made any written representation to respondent No.1. In my opinion, unless the proposal of the petitioner is putforth in a written form before respondent No.1 and the said respondent is presented with the opportunity to consider the oﬀer of the petitioner, the cause for the petitioner to approach this Court does not arise. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.1 with a detailed representation on the offer proposed to be made by him. If such a representation is received, respondent No.1 shall consider, take a decision and communicate the same to the petitioner. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by any such communication, he shall be free to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. As a sequel, WPMP No.39830/2011 is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Date: 7-12-2011 AM