CWP(T) No. 14793 of 2008 20.10.2011 Present: Mr. S. D. Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, vice Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate, for respondents No. 4, 5 and 9. The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State & CWP No. 4550 of 2010, titled as Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. and another. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.1/competent authority to examine the matter in light of the judgments, referred to above, and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition and copies of the judgments, referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 20, 2011 (PK)