SSK/ 1 can 25.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2011 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 328 OF 2000 Shri Abdulla Akbaralli Olia & Ors. ....Applicants/ Org.Petitioners Versus Kishore Chandra Ratilal Mehta & Ors. ..Org. Respondents Mr. V. A. Thorat i/b. M/s. Pandya & Poonawala, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Sham Walwe i/b. Mr. I. R. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 3. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 8TH APRIL, 2011. P.C.: Mr. Thorat, learned counsel, at the outset, seeks leave to delete the names of respondent nos. 2 & 3. Leave is granted at his own risk. Necessary amendment shall be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard Mr. Thorat, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Walwe, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 & 3. So far as respondent no.4 is concerned, none appears on his behalf, despite service. The affidavit of service to that effect is also filed. SSK/ 2 can 25.11 3. The civil application is filed for restoration of the above contempt petition. The contempt petition was dismissed as none appeared on behalf of the applicant when the same was called out for hearing on 20th October, 2010. The applicants have given reasons for his absence on that day in paragraph no.6 of the civil application. I find the same to be satisfactory. The civil application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). (RANJIT MORE, J.)