IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISC. APPEAL FC1 N0. °\9 /2011 MISC. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THEMOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 ^.^.;:4,.;-::-^ <^rJ 81^9^ APPELLANT :- Reliance General Insurance Company INSURER ^ Limited, Through : its Legal Officer, ^ Reliance General Insurance Company ••''./ Limited, 301-302, Corporate House, ./-/%.-' ..<"\ 169 RNT Marg, Opposite Jhabua ./*''',^'"" ..-•''\^N' Tower, Indore (M.P.) ^y^^ %^-'^ '^ RESPONDENTS CLAIMANTS VERSUS 1. Smt. Deshantari Sahu Wd/o Late Virendra Kumar Sahu, aged abut 36 years R/o Through Murlidhar Behra, Mathpara, Bajrang Chowk - Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ashish Sahu S/o Late Virendra Kumar Sahu, aged about 14 years (Minor child through her mother Deshantari Sahu) 3. Laxmibai Wd/o Late Masatram Sahu, aged about 70 years, Respondents No. 2 & 3 both are R/o yillage Mednipur, P.S. - Basna, District - Mahasamund, at present R/o Mathpara Bajrang Chowk, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) DRIVER 4. Indrashekhar Jha S/ol Shiv Shekhar Jha, aged about 29 years R/o Udai, P.S.- Behra, District - Darbhanga (Bihar) at present R/o Sevak Union Transport Company, Odamnaka, Kathlal, P.S. - Kathlal, District - Ahmedabad (Gujrat). 5. Smt, Annudevi Jha W/o Hemchand Jha, aged about 30 years, R/o Near Swami Narayan Temple, Meethwali Pol, Dholka Ahemadabad, District - Ahemadaba (Gujrat). APPEAL VALUED AT RS. 1.57.000/. COURT FEE Rs. 15/- -' 1. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISC. APPEAL (0 N0. 99 OF 2011 APPELLANT iNSURER RESPONDENTS (Claimants) Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Versus Smt. Deshantari Sahu and others. MISC. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLESACT.1988 Kw (Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.l Present : Shri Sourabh Sharma, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28th day of January, 2011) Heard on I.A. 02, application for withdrawal of M.A.(C) No.99of2011. On due consideration, the appiication is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw th^appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The deposit receipt flled aiong with this appeal be retumed to the appellant on appellant's furnishing authenticated photo copy of the same. _._—-„ , S(U- N.K.Agarwal Judge