IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20182 of 2009 1. GOBIND SAO 2. Arbind Sao Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 17.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the only non-bailable offence under Section 379 of I.P.C. is super added allegation. There is dispute in between the parties over construction of wall in between their shops. Finding the same true, Police allowed them on bail. So, I find no further need to allow them anticipatory bail. Accordingly, petitioners are directed to continue on bail, so granted to them, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 121 of 2007 pending in the Court of C.J.M. Gaya. With the above observation, the application is disposed of. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)