IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.338 of 2009 1. REWATI RAMAN PRASAD, S/O LATE KARTIK PRASAD, R/O J/65, KANKARBAGH, P.S. KANKARBAGH, IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA. 2. MUNINDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD, S/O LATE BHUWANESHWAR PRASAD, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF 5/182, HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. KANKARBAGH, IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA. -PETITIONERS Versus 1. SRI V.JAI SHANKAR, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, 6 MANGLE’S ROAD, PATNA. 2. SRI RAM SHOVIT JHA, SECRETARY OF PATNA SECRETARIAT MINISTERIAL OFFICERS’ CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY LTD. B/1 SACHIVALAYA COLONY, IN FRONT OF CENTRAL SCHOOL, PATNA-800 020. -OPPOSITE PARTIES 3 29.04.2009 It is the contention of the petitioners that the orders of this Court passed in CWJC no. 2416 of 1976 dated 24.2.1981 and MJC no. 894 of 1989 on 25.6.1990 were not complied. The order of this Court contained in Annexure-1 was passed as early as on 24th February, 1981 and the order as contained in Annexure-2 was passed on 25th June, 1990 in a contempt application. There was a direction given in the order passed in MJC application to carry out the directions given in the judgment within three months from the date of disposal of the same. If it is not carried out within three 2 months, they were given the right to question the same by filing MJC application. Now nine years have passed after the above order to comply with the directions within three months from the date of passing of the order. The contention of the petitioners is that the petitioners were entitled to big plots instead of small plots. That show that orders have already been passed. It is for the petitioner to challenge consequential order in competent court. It is the case of the petitioners that petitioners went up to the Supreme Court. It is also further submitted that another petition is pending and the court directed that no construction will be made. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the consequential order it is for the petitioners to challenge the same in the writ petition. In the circumstances, the MJC application does not lie and it is dismissed with the above directions. (J.B. Koshy, CJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad 3