HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3834 OF 2011 DATE:23-09-2011 BETWEEN Darsi Viswanadham …Petitioner AND Darsi Adinarayana …Respondent THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3834 OF 2011 ORDER: Petitioner-plaintiff filed O.S.No.50 of 2006 for declaration of title and for recovery of possession, in which, he obtained temporary injunction in I.A.No.30 of 2007 on 27.2.2007. He filed another application in I.A.No.29 of 2007 seeking appointment of the commissioner to verify the physical features of the petition schedule property and the said petition was ordered. On granting temporary injunction, he filed impugned I.A.No.1492 of 2009 in I.A.No.110 of 2007 seeking demolition of the constructions made on suit schedule property alleging that the respondent-defendant in violation of the injunction order proceeded with the construction. Before filing the said I.A., he filed I.A.No.110 of 2007 for appointment of commissioner, in which, the commissioner submitted a report. In the report, the commissioner specifically mentioned in the answer to the work memo of the respondent that he has no authority to decide to whom newly constructed house belongs to. The version of the respondent was that the alleged new construction is not made by him and that his son is making new constructions and that he is no way concerned with the new construction and the alleged new construction is not made in the schedule property but it is in another side of his son. Taking into consideration of the above, the lower Court rightly dismissed the impugned I.A. No infirmity is discernable with the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. The revision is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 Tsr.