IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.13288 of 2010 ==================================================== Pradip Jaiswal, aged about 35 years, Son of Shri Dashrath Pd. Choudhary, resident of village-Dumri, P.S.-Raghopur and Distt-Supaul. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. District Magistrate, Supaul. 3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pupri, Distt-Supaul. 4. Executive Engineer, R.E.O., Supaul. 5. Officer-in-Charge of Raghopur, P.S. Distt-Supaul. 6. Anchal Adhikari, Raghopur, Distt-Supaul. …. …. Respondents ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satyeshwar Prasad, A.C. to S.C.-19 ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 17.8.2010. The petitioner, an individual, has brought this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in public interest. It is the complain of the petitioner that the respondent authorities have failed to remove the encroachment on the Government road No.1135 of village-Dumari under Raghopur Anchal, District-Supaul. The petition is as vague as vagueness can be. Neither the petitioner discloses the names of the encroachers nor the area of the encroachment nor the nature of the encroachment. Moreover, the correspondence annexed to the petition suggests that the petitioner too is one of the encroachers. We refuse to entertain this petition in public - 2 - interest as the petitioner has not taken care of placing all relevant materials before the Court. The Petition is disposed of. Pawan/- (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Jyoti Saran, J)