IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.15099-M of 2009 Date of Decision:10.8.2010 Rajiv Prafful Kamdar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Narang, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.256 dated 28.12.2007 registered under Sections 420,406,467,471,120-B IPC at Police Station City Batala. In the reply filed in connected petition i.e. Crl.W.P. No.432 of 2009 by way of affidavit of Manohar Lal, PPS, Dputy Superintendent of Police, City Batala, Police District Batta, it is submitted in para 2 of the preliminary submissions that an inquiry was conducted by Sh. Narinder Pal Singh, PPS, the then DSP/D Batala and after perusing the record and statements got recorded during inquiry, he came to the conclusion that accused Rajiv Prafful Kamdar is innocent. Accordingly, he recommended for discharging the accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition in view of the written statement filed in connected petition i.e. Crl.W.P. No.432 of 2009 with liberty to file fresh in case of any further development against the present petitioner. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 10.8.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE