IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2009 / 24TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1422 of 2009(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.P.HARIS, VATHUKKAL PARAMBIL HOUSE, PALERI, KUTTIYADI. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA. SMT.SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.1422 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 14th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage bearing Reg. No.KL-11/P 7832. He made application to the respondent for claiming parity in running timing with respect to identical services. That was rejected and the order was challenged before the Tribunal in MVARP No.91/2008. The revision was allowed by Ext.P1 and the matter was remitted back to the respondent for reconsideration. The petitioner states that though the Tribunal disposed of the revision by order dated 26/04/2008, the matter has not been finalised by the respondent so far. It is with that complaint, the writ petition is filed. 2. Taking into account the aforesaid facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for parity in running time as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg