IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R No.2750 of 2008 Date of Decision: 7.10.2010 Virender Singh. ....... Petitioner through Shri P.R.Yadav, Advocate. Versus Bhoop Singh and another. ....... Respondent no.1 through Shri Rajesh Lamba, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... Mahesh Grover,J. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been directed against order dated 15.4.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari vide which the application moved by the petitioner for staying the proceedings in Civil Suit No.509 of 2008 was dismissed. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly stated that the petitioner would be satisfied if the two suits filed by respondent no.1, i.e., one for recovery & mandatory injunction and the other for rendition of accounts are clubbed and tried together. Upon this, learned counsel for respondent no.1 also stated that C.R No.2750 of 2008 -2- .... he would have no objection if the two suits are clubbed and tried together. In view of the above and also having regard to the fact that the two suits pertain to a dispute inter se between the partners, the instant revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the aforesaid civil suits filed by respondent no.1 and pending in the Courts at Rewari be clubbed and tried together. October 07,2010 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge