..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1196 OF 2008 Abdul Wase Mohammed Ali Chaudhari and 2 others. ..Applicants. Versus State of Maharashtra and 2 others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.A.K.Singh, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.A.O.Shukla, Adv. for respondent No.3. Ms.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 1st December, 2008. DATED : 1st December, 2008. DATED : 1st December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicants - orig.accused, the learned Advocate for respondent No.3 - orig.complainant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of Case No.476/P/2001 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court, Andheri, Mumbai. It pertains to C.R. No.132 of 2001 of Sakinaka police station. The said case is mainly under Sections 363 and 385 of Indian Penal Code. ..(2).. 3. The learned Advocate for the complainant states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the complainant does not wish to pursue the complaint and the proceedings relating thereto. 4. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties and the decision of the Apex Court in the case of B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana B.S.Joshi and another Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) and another, reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) and another, reported in Judgment Today 2003(3) S.C.277 S.C.277 S.C.277, the prayer of the applicant can be considered. Hence, Case No.476/P/2001 pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 22nd Court, Andheri, Mumbai and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)