In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 239 of 2009 (O&M) Smt. Bimla Devi ... Petitioner. vs Naveen and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Suman Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate, for the respondents. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 6.12.2008 passed by the learned court below whereby it was directed that the proceedings in the suits titled as “Bimla vs Naveen” and “Bala vs Bimla” where the issue involved is regarding validity of the Will dated 4.12.1996 executed by deceased Rishal Singh and further that in case the Will is not upheld then the claim of the parties be decided as per inheritance. The learned court below vide impugned order clubbed the trial of both the suits. Learned counsel for the respondents, referring to the order dated 7.1.2010 passed by the learned court below after the passing of the impugned order, submitted that the evidence of the parties has already been concluded and the case has now been adjourned to 16.1.2010 for rebuttal evidence. It was submitted that infact, after the impleading of respondents no. 4 to 6 in the suit titled as “Bimla vs Naveen” the entire evidence is being led in that case and the same shall be read in subsequent suit titled as “Bala vs Bimla”. Considering the stage of the trial which is nearing conclusion, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order directing of clubbing of both the suits. The revision is accordingly dismissed. 14.1.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge