IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52805 of 2008 UPENDRA BHAGAT Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 19.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased alleged for demand, torture due to its non-fulfillment and killing, but submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that victim died as a result of excess bleeding which appeared after investigation and during trial as parents of the petitioner faced trial and acquitted. Basing which rest of the family members have been allowed anticipatory bail, even then petitioner is apprehending his arrest which can never be justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Atari P.S. Case No. 5 of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)