IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.823/2008 Awadhut Rimaji Raghute ..vs.. State =================================== CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR, J. DATE: 3.3.2008 Heard Mr. Gupte, Advocate for the applicant. Leave to convert the application into one under section 482 of Cr.P.C. is granted. Notice. Learned A.P.P. Mr. Kothari, waives notice for state and opposes the application. This application can be disposed at this very stage. The order of the learned trial court dated 25.2.2008 shows that the ad-interim order passed in favour of the applicant as regards anticipatory bail was not confirmed by him only because the applicant allegedly flouted the condition of appearing before the court on all dates of hearing. It is pointed out that the applicant had made submission that he could not remain present before the court on that date, because he was present before the Industrial Court. In these circumstances of the case, in such a situation, learned trial Judge should not have cancelled the order of interim bail granted to the applicant. Hence it would be necessary to set aside that order with direction to learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara to consider the application of the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail, if that order is not passed. Hence order accordingly. This application stands disposed of. Hamdast granted. JUDGE smp.