1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 15 OF 1996 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 900 OF 1995 IN SUIT NO. 711 OF 1995 M/s. Welset Engineers & Anr. ....Petitioners. Versus M/s. Vikas Auto Industries & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. Faraz Alam Sagar, Advocate i/b. M/s Wadia Ghandy and Co., Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Bhagyesh P. Joshi, Advocate for Defendants. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 8th MARCH, 2010. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The contempt petition was taken our for non-compliance of the order dated 17th October, 2000 passed in notice of motion no. 900 of 1995 in suit no. 711 of 1995. Initially, the contempt petition was dismissed on merits and thereafter, the Petitioners approached the Apex Court and the Apex Court set- aside the dismissal of the contempt petition and remanded the matter back to the High Court. 2 3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners, now submits that the dispute between the parties is amicably settled and the suit is also disposed of interms of the Consent Terms. In that view of the matter, the grievance of the Petitioners does not survive and in the circumstances, leave to withdraw the contempt petition is asked for. Leave is granted. The contempt petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. (R. V. MORE, J.)