IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.432 OF 2005 M/s. Promuk Hoffman International Ltd. .... Petitioner Vs. State of Goa & Ors. .... Respondents Shri M.S. Sonak for the Petitioner. Sarvasri S.S. Kantak, Advocate General, with Ms R. Chodankar, A.G.A. For the Respondent No.1. Shri D. Lawande for the Respondent No.3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.457 OF 2005 M/s. Hind Industries Ltd. .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Goa through its Chief Secretary & Ors. .... Respondents Sarvasri S.G. Dessai, Sr. Advocate, with V.R. Tamba, Advocate for the Petitioner. Sarvasri S.S. Kantak, Advocate General, with Ms R. Chodankar, A.G.A., for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri D. Lawande for the Respondent No.3. Coram: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. Date: 14th February, 2006 P.C: On pronouncement of the Judgments, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners prayed for continuation of the interim relief during the pendency of the hearing of the matter which was objected to by the learned Advocate General. Considering the facts of the case, we are not inclined to grant the relief prayed for for four weeks. However, in the interest of justice, interim relief shall continue to be in force for a period of two weeks only. Certified copy expedited. (N.A. BRITTO, J.) (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.)