1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR L.P.A.NO.127 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.5558 OF 2009 (D) Shri Sarswati Vidya Mandir Amgaon through its President ..vs.. Sau.Ranjana w/p Pawankumar Badole and anr. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. D.B.Mahajan Adv. for the appellants. C ORAM : S.A.Bobde & M.L.Tahaliyani, JJ. DATED : 13th April, 2011. Heard. We have considered the matter. Shri Mahajan, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that the learned Single Judge ought to have interfered with the order of the Tribunal for condoning the delay of about two and half years. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, since the respondent was a employee in the bank and receiving a good salary, there could have been no financial difficulty which could have prevented the respondent from approaching the School Tribunal within the period of limitation. We see no merit in the submission. That apart, whether therre is a difficulty which prevented party from filing an appeal within time 2 is a pure question of fact. No perversity or illegality is shown in the order of the learned Single Judge. Hence, L.P.A. is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. chute