IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21461 of 2010 BANDEY YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 327,379/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant on the head with butt of the pistol causing grievous injury. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter-case and the case lodged by the father of this petitioner is prior in time and there is admitted land dispute between the parties and the petitioner has no intention to kill the informant. Let the learned court below consider 2 all these aspects particularly in view of the fact that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail while considering the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced by this order. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)