IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19 of 2009 KAMALDEO PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS ----------- 2. 15.01.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner was posted at Azamnagar. While on duty at Azamnagar he was sent on deputation to Dandkhora. By order dated 24.6.2008 he was transferred from Azamnagar to Falka. He came to this Court in CWJC No. 11830 of 2008. the submission was of frequent transfers. The Court quashed the order dated 24.6.2008. Subsequent liberty was given to file certain representation. In consequence of the order of the writ court the respondents have transferred the petitioner back to Azamnagar. This Court finds no error in the action of the respondents. The deputation at Dandkhora was not a matter of legal right. There is no material on record with regard to the fact whether the order of deputation was for a fixed period. Even if that had been so, the issue of the order of the court obtained by the petitioner in CWJC No. 11830 of 2008 shall still have its impact. To that extent this Court finds no merit in the writ application. It is accordingly dismissed. The issue that the petitioner may have filed any representation with regard to the government policy is aspects to be considered by the authorities notwithstanding the order dated 15.9.2008. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)