1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3595 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Laxman s/o Nagu Khupse and anr. .. Respondents Shri K.S.Patil, A.P.P. for applicant Shri Abhishek Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE : 26th February 2010 PER COURT 1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging an order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Beed, dated 11.1.2008 declining to accept “A” Summary submitted by the applicant in respect of death of Raju @ Rajesh Laxman Khupse. It appears that initially offence punishable under Section 307, 147, 148 read with sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code came to be registered vide Crime No.95/06. It appears that deceased Raju had died while he was being escorted to the Court. The Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected the summary on the ground that there was other eye witness whose statement had not been recorded and the Chief Judicial Magistrate, therefore, declined to accept the summary and directed the appointment of an Investigating Officer and to conduct the investigation in accordance with law. The aforesaid order was passed on 11.1.2008. 2 2. I have heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the applicant and I have perused the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Beed. Upon perusal of the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Beed as well as the documents which have been annexed along with this application, I do not find any error in the order passed by the trial Court to warrant any interference in the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In that light of the matter, therefore, the present application is dismissed. ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) (vvr/3595.08criappln)