IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUR "WtE Writ Petition No.'?£^^/2006 PETITIONER ^..^•••l?"^0-'^"". ^^o!£---" L \\^-}"1' .,;**" \s. Devendra Giri Goswami S/o Late Shri. B.G.Goswami Aged about 51 Years, Employed as Data Assistant, O/o Executive Engineer ( E&M ), Repairs and Reclamation Secfion, Water Resources Department, Raipur Residing at: 2014, Stadium Road, Kota, RAIPUR (CG). •^ Versus RESPONDENTS .0'0^A &ov ^' '/\' ,^ ^ ^" < ^ ^v /, y.yi SiTfc ^/^'S<1 ' r^A v^h^ ^iL-^.'^ ^ ^ oTt'^ fc.^1^^3S ,.-.=^^ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. \^ State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR-491002fCG) TheChiefEngiaeer, Water Resources Department; Sihawa Bhawan, CivilLines, RAIFUR - 492001 (CG) The ChiefEngineer, Mahanadi Project, Raipur Water Resources Department, S.R.P.Chowk, ShankarNagarRoad, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) The Superintending Engineer, Electrical and Mechanical Division, Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, RAIPUR -49200.1 (CG) The Executive Engineer, Heavy Equipment (E&M) Division, Water Resources Deptt. OCM-Chowk Irrigation Department, RAIPTJR (CG) -"^<~ ^° A» -y ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ESDIA FOR ^THEISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS EV THE f NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS ETC. --..-<; XI-HC-78 *<i'l<ni sh*ira» 3^' •<11<<1<-1<1, ^•M'IS, fadiyy .fA'.f..}.&.*:^!£).&. W[ 200 w^TTarai'(^crf^^c) 3n^T5RTt?-lNi ^T 3?n^T ^N? ihan/- ^ f<- ^ 5RTTWflf?tT3n^r 21.7.2006 Shri B.P. Rao, Advocate for- tl' Shri Satish 6upta, t>y. 6ovt. ^ wrfa^r WRff ff fei^ <Rf+di< ^sil^rsn^r ie petitioner-. tdv. for the State on advance copy. Heard. The main grievance of the p^titioner in this petition is That he hee not been given the benefit of Assured Career Pro9ression Scheme inspite of the fact that The petitioner has complel aiready made representort'ions (Ann< soTar. Therefore, iearned counse ;ed 25 years of service. The petitioner has xure P-4 & P-5) but nothing has been done for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be aiiowed To md<^ a detaiied r'epresentation to respondent No.3 and in turn, respondent N accordance with iaw, to which ieam< b.3 be directed to decide the same in id counsei for the Stcrte has no obJecTion. Having heord learned couns^l for the parties and having regard to the facts ond circumstcmces of the c^se, without expressin9 any opinion on the merits of The cose, the petitioner js aiiowed to make a detailed representotion along with copy of This petition to and in turn respondent No.3 is hespondent No.3 within ten da/s from today directed to decide The representation of petitioner within a period of $ months from the date of recejpt of representation in accordance with With the aforesaid, the pel Certified copy as per rules. C ». ition stands disposedof^ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.