THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.6182 OF 2010 Dated 18th March, 2010 Between: M/s Adarsh Junior College …Petitioner And The Employees Provident Fund and another …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G.Praveen Kumar Counsel for the respondents: Sri R.N.Reddy Standing Counsel The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside order dated 27.01.2010 passed by respondent No.2. The petitioner is a College. By order dated 18.10.2006, the Assistant Commissioner, under the provisions of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short “the Act”), determined the petitioner’s liability towards payment of employees provident fund from November, 2004 to March, 2006. Questioning the said determination, the petitioner filed W.P.No.7802 of 2007. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court, by order dated 17.04.2007, declining to adjudicate the writ petition on merits and relegating the petitioner to file appeal under Section 7-I of the Act subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the determined amount before the appellate authority. Admittedly, the petitioner failed to file such an appeal and allowed the determination made on 18.10.2006 final. By the impugned demand, the respondents sought to enforce the order of determination by calling upon the petitioner to pay the arrears of Rs.3,90,938/-. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.N.Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The facts noted above clearly show that the petitioner failed to question the order passed under Section 7-A of the Act, despite this Court giving such liberty while disposing W.P.No.7802 of 2007. Having allowed the order to become final, the petitioner is not entitled to question the consequential demand notice in this writ petition. I do not, therefore, find any merit to entertain this writ petition. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded that the petitioner may be permitted to pay the amount in reasonable installments. Having heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that in the interests of justice, the petitioner may be allowed to pay the amount due in two equal monthly installments. Ordered accordingly. The first installment amount shall be paid on or before 15th April, 2010 and the second installment amount shall be paid on or before 15th May, 2010. If the petitioner commits default in payment of either of these two installments within the stipulated time, the respondents shall be free to take appropriate action against the petitioner for recovery of the amount. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.7950 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 18th March, 2010 vrn