1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Review No. 61 of 2007 Decided on: 26th March, 2008 Union of India & others Petitioners Versus Registrar Central Administrative Tribunal & another Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr Justice Surinder Singh,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No For the Petitioner (s): Mr. Y. P. S. Dhaulta, Central Govt. Counsel For the Respondent: Deepak Gupta,J. (Oral) CMP (M) No. 714 of 2007 Keeping in view the averments, made in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the review petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?yes 2 Civil Review No. 61 of 2007. The only ground, raised in this review petition, is that the respondent was required to work for five hours and was not required to work for eight hours. Learned Tribunal in its order has clearly noted that it was not disputed before it that the respondent herein was performing the duty of Chowkidar for more than 16 hours. We had accepted this pure finding of fact, recorded by the learned Tribunal, we do not find any error on the face of the record. Hence the review petition is dismissed. CMP No.80 of 2007 No order in view of the dismissal of the main review petition. The application is disposed of. (Deepak Gupta),J. March 26, 2008 (Surinder Singh),J. (D)