1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition NO. 5005/2010 Sant Shri Dadaji Dhuniwale Math Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr .Jawade, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Joshi, AGP. for the respondent. no.1 and 2. CORAM ; B. P. DHARMADHIKRI, J. DATED : 18th October, 2010. Advocate Jawde contends that in a title suit filed by petitioner, reason given by counsel and not of State of Maharashtra was placed while seeking leave to file written statement. He asserts that argument is mechanically accepted. This is second round of litigation. Learned AGP states that on earlier occasion costs of Rs. 5000/- was saddled on the respondents. Those costs were paid and then for taking written statement on record costs of Rs. 250/- were saddled. He further points out that suit is filed against the Government seeking declaration that certain lands belonging to State Government are properties of the petitioner-Trust. 2 Perusal of record shows that petitioner are claiming title to survey no.121/1 admeasuring 67.74 hectors and suit is registered as Regular Civil Suit No. 1142/1997. Assistant District Government Pleader, Nagpur has in application seeking leave to file written statement filed on 2.7.2010 stated parawise comments were not received. There is substance in contention of petitioner that in stead of placing difficulties of defendants before the trial Court the reason of counsel has been pressed into service. The reason is not totally irrelevant. Moreover, in the present facts as Court has considered all relevant material and has exercised jurisdiction in particular way, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is rejected. No costs. JUDGE ambulkar