IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13465 of 2008 AMOD BIND THUTHA @ MADHUA BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 2.5.2008 Heard both sides. The petitioner has approached this court for grant of bail in Barauni P.S. Case no.202 of 2007 registered for the offence under Sections 302,201,120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. Referring to the impugned order, it has been submitted that the only evidence available against the petitioner is that subsequently some witnesses stated that the petitioner was also the member of the group which committed the alleged crime. It is further submitted that apart from the said evidence, there is no material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently suspicion has been raised that he was also the member of the mob which committed the offence and the names of persons constituting the group have already appeared in the First Information Report, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner Amod Bind @ Thutha @ Madhua Bind on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge I, Begusarai in S.T. No.31 of 2008 arising out of Barauni P.S. Case no.202 of 2007, subject 2 to the condition that one of the bailors should be the own family member of the petitioner. Neyaz/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)