IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9272 of 2010 1. Chinta Kumari W/O Yogendra Kumar Vill.- Mukhdumpur, P.O. Kurtha, P.S. Kurtha, Distt.- Arwal Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Social Welfre Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Commissioner Magadh Division, Distt.- Gaya 5. The District Magistrate, Arwal, Distt.- Arwal 6. The District Programme Officer Arwal, Distt.- Arwal 7. The Child Development Project Officer Kurtha, Distt.- Arwal 8. The Mukhia Of Grampanchayat, Bara, Block- Kurtha, Distt.- Arwal ----------- 4. 18.10.2011 The petitioner, an Anganwari Sewika is aggrieved by the order dated 1.5.2010 as issued on 5.5.2010 of the District Magistrate removing her from the post of Anganwari Sewika on allegations for dereliction in discharge of duties. Counsel for the State raises a preliminary objection to the remedy of Appeal available to the petitioner before the Commissioner of the Division. Considering that the writ petition was filed barely 20 days later, and the limitation under the instruction for such appeal is 30 days, the writ petition was filed well within the period of limitation. Therefore, if the petitioner files such appeal before the Commissioner within a period of 30 days from today, let the appellate authority consider the same and after hearing all concerned dispose it off by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum 2 period of three months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of such memo of appeal. Should the petitioner file any application seeking interim relief during the pendency of the Appeal, naturally the Court expects the Commissioner to dispose off the interim application without awaiting the disposal of the appeal itself. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)