IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2038 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO.2038 OF 2006. APPLICATION NO.2038 OF 2006. IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.11394 OF 1989. APPEAL (ST) NO.11394 OF 1989. APPEAL (ST) NO.11394 OF 1989. .................................................................. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. .................................................................. Shri B.H.Mehta, A.G.P for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 10th December, 2007. : 10th December, 2007. : 10th December, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.G.P for the applicant. The office noting shows that the respondent No.8(a) as been served and as against other legal representatives of respondent No.8 the application stands dismissed. 2. In view of averments made in the application, the application deserves to be allowed by condoning the delay. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). However, it is clarified that only the respondent No.8(a) can be brought on record. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE