1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2006 Pralhad Sawata Kadam .. Applicant. vs. Pinky Pralhad Kadam & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Vishwanath S. Talkute for Applicant. Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, APP. for Respondent State. Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007. Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007. Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. . Heard 2. The only question raised in this revision application is that the applicant should be given set off of a sum of Rs. 40,000/- which he paid in the settlement with his wife in Petition No. 347 of 1995. The learned Judge has taken that into consideration and found that while settling the dispute with her husband the wife having agreed for a permanent alimony in the 2 sum of Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 20,000/-, each for the two children could not have compromised the right of the children to claim maintenance from their father. We may add that it was also not in the interest of the children as at that stage they were too small. It was a very meagre amount and, therefore, we do not find any reason to entertain this petition. The same is dismissed. No order as to costs. 3. Certified copy expedited. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )