IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14445 of 2009 Between: Parvathi Panigrahi, W/o. Radhakrishna Panigrahi, R/o.Kotturu Village & Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District. 2 The Inspector of Police, Kottur Police Station, Srikakulam District. 3 The Tahsildar, Kotturu Mandal, Srikakulam District. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in interfering with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of plot admeasuring Ac.0.01 cents in Survey No.276 of Kotturu Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner filed O.S.No.29 of 2002 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Pathapatnam against respondents 2 and 3 and others for permanent injunction when they sought to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the said property. The said suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 25.11.2008. The petitioner averred that after obtaining permission for construction of a new house in the place of a thatched shed from Kotturu Gram Panchayat, when she started raising construction, respondent No.2 along with his subordinate staff allegedly interfered with the said construction. On instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that in view of the judgment and decree referred to above, the respondents are not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner or the construction commenced by her. This submission is placed on record and the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail her legal remedy in the event, the respondents interfere with her enjoyment of the property referred to above in future. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.18943 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 27th July, 2009 vrn