IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.7764 of 2010 Between: S. Mahabub Bee ……PETITIONER(S) and The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool and others ……RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.7764 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri J.U.M.V.Prasad, the learned counsel for petitioner; the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2; and Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao, the learned counsel for 3rd respondent. At their request, the Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 1st respondent is not registering a crime and taking any action on the complaint dated 24.03.2010 given by her against the 3rd respondent who is misusing his official capacity as 2nd respondent and also other named accused. The case of the petitioner is that after taking divorce from her husband she went abroad, acquired certain properties and distributed the same to her sons after retaining a house property bearing No.1-148-63, Sundaraiahnagar Road, Kodumur, Kurnool District, for her shelter and living alone. While so, her sons and daughters-in-law have threatened and harassed her to give them the house property also. Therefore, she filed O.S.No.967 of 2009 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, for perpetual injunction along with I.A.No.1766 of 2009 wherein interim injunction was granted against her sons and daughters-in-law. It is alleged that though there is an injunction order in existence, she was illegally detained by the 2nd respondent in collusion with her sons and daughters-in-law from 20.03.2010 to 24.03.2010 without there being any crime registered against her with an intention to grab her self-acquired property, and the 3rd respondent acting as 2nd respondent misused his official capacity and subjected her to physical and mental agony, in the police station. That after her release from illegal detention on 24.03.2010, she went to her home, but was prevented from entering the same, as the 3rd respondent has put another lock on the advice of her sons. Therefore, she gave a complaint against him and her sons to the 1st respondent to take action, but no action has been taken. Counter affidavits have been filed on behalf of the 1st and 3rd respondents. The action taken reports are also filed. Today the learned counsel for petitioner submits that a Crime has been registered on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 24.03.2010, and in view of that no further orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. Hence, recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. 20th October 2010 CVRK