IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.W.P. No.14620 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:13.12.2010 Sunit Kumari .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present:- Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. Balram Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anamika Negi, Advocate. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (Oral) There is not much dispute before me in this case that the petitioner in fact is entitled to a village seat but has been made to study in some different institution. The justification offered by the State Government is that the Board had sent the merit list of the candidates to the Government and accordingly, the admission was granted. Counsel for the petitioner points out that as per Annexures P.9, 28 seats are still lying vacant at DIET Madina which is the village of the petitioner. Since there is a specific difference in the fee that will be payable in case the petitioner is granted admission to village seat she cannot be denied her right to get admission in village seat. The respondents are C.W.P. No.14620 of 2009 (O&M) -2- directed to permit the petitioner to take admission in DIET Madina. The fee paid by the petitioner shall be liable to be refunded for which she may make a representation. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. December 13, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) renu JUDGE