WP(C) 3238/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondent authorities to conside r his case for regularization of his services in terms of the Office Memorandum No. B(2) H-97/2003/90 dated 17th July, 2004 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition). I have heard Mr. P.Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. M. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam and Mr. A.K . Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent No.4, Principal, Furkating College, Furkating, Dist. Golaghat, Assam (herein after referred to as College’). While asserting his claim for regularization of the services of the petitioner in terms of the above Office Memorandum, the petitioner has alle ged unfair denial thereof by the State respondents. The written instructions rec eived from the Director of Higher Education, Assam by Mr Dutta indicate absence of any proposal from the College for adjustment/regularization of his services in terms of the clause 4(a) and 4(b) of the aforementioned Memorandum an affidav it has been filed by the respondent No.4 in the instant proceeding to the effect that the petitioner has the eligibility as per UGC norms for being appointed ag ainst a sanctioned post in any deficit grants-in-aid College of the State as a l ecturer. In the above factual premise the petition is disposed of requir ing the State respondents to act in terms of the operative direction embodied in the judgment and order dated 14.5.09 which is extracted herein below:- Considering the matter in its entirety, it is hereby provided that the directions as contended in paragraphs17 of the aforesaid judgment in writ appeal No.219/2006 shall also govern the case of the petitioners. It is also provided that the respondents before publishing the final list, may publish a provisional list indicating the necessary particulars of the teachers and inviting objectio ns from the teachers working against non-sanctioned posts to have their say in t he matter and after taking into account, the objections, if filed, the authority may draw the final list towards adjustment of non-sanctioned teachers. The enti re exercise may be carried out as expeditiously as possible, preferably within t hree months of receipt of copy of this judgment and order . No costs.