IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10763 of 2008 RAMESH SHUKLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 27.08.2008 Heard. The petitioner is named in the FIR and the allegation is that when he woke up on the sound of a gun shot he found this petitioner having shot into the temple of his son. The contention is that the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas has doubted the truthfulness of the version and also found certain absurdities in the prosecution case and as such granted bail to an accused, i.e., an order annexed as Annexure-3 and that passed by me while acting as District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas. I may point out that the absurdities or infirmities in the materials could be available to that particular accused, who was being granted bail by me in the capacity of Sessions Judge. As regards the prayer of present petitioner, the material is definite, the allegation is clear and considering that, the petition is dismissed. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)