1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2313 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2313 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 2313 OF 2005 Shri. Pawan Dnyanesh Bedade ... Petitioner Versus Senapati Tatya Tope Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Yeola and Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Anilkumar Patil for Petitioner. Mr. R.D. Rane, Govt Pleader for R. Nos. 3 to 6. Ms. Manjiri Parasnis with Mr. G.S. Godbole for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 07, 2006 DATED : FEBRUARY 07, 2006 DATED : FEBRUARY 07, 2006 P.C. . The respondent management has already appointed a candidate in the vacancy which had arisen. The stand of the Management is that even if the G.R. relied upon was considered, though not applicable, the Petitioner had to apply within six months from attaining the majority. In the instant case, it was not so done and in fact the post was advertised against which a candidate has been duly selected and appointed. Once that be the case, we do not find this to be a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) 2 (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)