IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 52 of 2008 (M/B) Sanjay Kumar Aggrawal …………………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………..……..Respondents. Sri B. Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Parikshit Saini, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Sri Tanuj Semwal, Asst. Government Advocate, for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Learned counsel for the parties are present. (2) Sri Tanuj Semwal, Asst. Government Advocate, makes a statement that after completion of investigation no offence is said to have been made out against the petitioner Sanjay Kumar Aggrawal. A short counter affidavit has also been filed by the Investigating Officer to this effect that after completion of investigation Final Report has been submitted on 14.03.2008. (3) In view of the above development, this writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with the observation that the interim order dated 29.01.2008, passed by this Court, shall continue till the Final Report is received by the court concerned. (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 13.06.2008 NS