MC 930/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI Misc. Case 930 of 2011 in WP(C) 4067/2008 Heard Mr. D. Das, learned Senior counsel, for the applicant, and Mr. BN Gogoi, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent No.1. Heard also Mr. RK Talukd ar, learned counsel, for the respondent No.3, and Mr. A. Deka, learned counsel, for the respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, i t is hereby directed that in the order, dated 21.02.2011, passed, in WP(C) No.40 67/2008, in paragraph 1, the expressions ’in Pandu College, Guwahati, in the yea r 1976’, in paragraph 2, the expressions, ’he ought to have been treated as reti red, on 30.06.2006’ and in paragraph 5, the expressions, ’there is no dispute th at in terms of the 1969 Rules’, shall stand corrected, and be read, as ’in Pandu College, Guwahati, in the year 1966’, ’he ought to have been treated as retired , on 30.06.2005’ and ’there is no dispute that in terms of the 1960 Rules’ respe ctively. With the above corrections, this Misc. Case shall stand disposed of.