IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP. No.758 of 2008. Date of Decision : April 30, 2010. State of H.P and another. Petitioners. Vs. Amar Chand and another. Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No For the petitioners. Mr. P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General. For the respondents : Mr.V.B.Verma, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J(Oral). It is undisputed before us that the point of law involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in CWP. No. 459 of 2002 titled State of H.P. Vs. Ruldu Ram and others decided on 2nd January, 2008. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that it shall abide by the directions as issued in that writ petition. The writ petition filed by the State is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Let a copy of the order passed in CWP.No. 459 of 2002 1 Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?yes. 2 titled State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Ruldu Ram and others be placed on the record of this case. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. (Kuldip Singh), Judge. April 30,2010(R)