IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39061 of 2009 1. DHIRAJ SHARMA S/O RAM DAYAL SHARMA 2. RAM DAYAL SHARMA @ RAM DAYAL THAKUR S/O LATE SITA RAM THAKUR ………… PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that in fact before the present first information report was instituted petitioner no.2 had instituted a case about the occurrence stating therein that it is the injured informant and the prosecution had thrown acid on the petitioner no.1 and others. It has further been submitted that subsequent to the first information report, the present informant filed a case the next day not explaining the delay and he in fact had sustained injury of about 6% on his face but grievous in nature. Having considered the counter version of the occurrence and the fact that the petitioners have remained in custody since 30.5.2009 and have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S.case No.49 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )