IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.06.2010 C.R.No.1953 of 2010 Lal Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus Sundri Devi (widow) and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 5. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court on 11.02.2010, whereby the appeal was restored to its original number, which was earlier dismissed in default. Reasoning given by the learned first Appellate Court cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or irregularity, which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. In fact, failure to restore the appeal would have cause substantial injustice to the respondents herein. In view thereof, I do not find any error in the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court, warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 30.06.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE