IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BL$?UR IA Ram Lal Rrrey, S/o. Shri Bodhé ’" Ram Ra’rr'ey, aged abou‘!‘ 38 / years, Working as Assismm" Teacher, GOVT. Primary Schooi - Kafbi’rla, Block Kor'ba DistT. - Korba (C.G.) {b / 1. Sfa‘re of Chhcx'h‘iSgarh Through T Secre‘mry Depari‘men‘i m‘ School Educafion D.K.S. hawah, Man’rmlaya Raipur (C.6.) . The Dis’rric’r Education Off‘cer Disf’r. - Bilaspur'(C.G.) 3. Assis‘ram‘ Commissioner‘ Tribal Welfare Depar‘i’men’r Korba (6.6.) / 4. Block EducaTion Officer, Block — Korba, Kar‘Tala, Km‘ghor‘a Dish‘. — Kor‘ba (C.G.) CHHATTISGARH w.P.SNo. oEl Izo PETITIONER a‘ N (5 W w “£ VERSU§ RESPONDENTs . he : B , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA5PUR W. 9(3) No. 1061 of 200? Pe‘l’i’fioner : Ram Lal Ra'rrey Versus Resporaden‘rs : S‘fa‘te 01‘ Chha‘r‘fisgar‘h and ofher‘s 5B: Hon‘ble Mr. Jus'rice $a1’is‘i K. Agnihoi't‘i,‘ J Present Mr. Amif K. Sharma, Advocafe for The pefitioner. Ms. Deepufi Paindey, Panel Lawyér {’or" ‘i'he 5m're/Fesp0r1den‘fs. ORDER (Passed an fhis 26"“ Day of February, 2007) A 1. The pefi'fiamr‘ was appbirrfed or: 26.G6.1993 as Assisi’mf Teacher on fixed pay smie of Rs. 1200/-. Affer‘ compiaion of Twc year proba'i'ion, he was grmfed reguiar‘ pay scaie of Rs. 1200-2040/-. 2. Learned ceunsei appearing for rhe pefificner submi'fs The? 'fhe issue irwelved ih f‘ne case is aS‘rc whei’her, ‘fhe pe‘i’ifiaher is eh‘h'Hed 1'0 regular pay seaie wef. 'fhe da‘l'e of inihal appoim'men'f er a‘Her comple‘fiah of proba‘fion periad. 3. The issue invaived, herein was considered by ihe Madhya Pradesh Sia’i’e Adminisi’ra‘i'ive Tribunai, Jabaipur if! GA. Na. 2T45/89 (Madhukahi Yadu and 5a oihers Vs. Siai'e 6f MP. & o'l'hers), wherein i'r was held ‘i'ha'i' The simiiariy si‘i'uai’ed Teachers are enii‘i’ied ’ra reguiar pay scaie wesfi. The daie of inii’iai appoin'imen'i. The ma‘f‘ier was iaken—up i'a The Han'bie Supreme Cour? in Speeiai Leave Peiifion (Civii) Na. 68g2/93. The said pe’l’iiian was dismissed b). WN’ V C3 by 'i'he Hm'ble Supreme Cour? upholding 'H'Ie decision of 'fhe Tribunal To i412 effect +ha1' The Teachers/Assisfam Teachers are én‘H‘Hed +0 reguim' pay scaie from daw 6f inifiai appoin‘l’men‘f. 4. Learned counsei appearing for “i'he pe'i’i'iioner fur'rher submi'i's fha‘i’ 'i’hE Caur-‘k', while comidering 'fhe same issue in Har Prasad Kurre and oihers vs. Sia'i'e of Chha‘f‘iisgdrh 8i oihers {W. P. (5) No. 5E1/2006} by arde’r‘ éa‘i’ed 3.10.2006, has gmm‘ed reguiar pay Sadie waf. 1'he «ia'fe of inifial appoin'i’men'i'. 5. Learnea counsei appearing for The par‘i'ies join'i'iy submi'l’ Thai 1his case is squareiy cavemd by fhe decision a’f +his Cour"? in 1he case of Hah Prasad Kurt‘e anti oihers vs. Sia‘ie of Chha'i'i'isgarh & afhers (Supra). 6. In View of ‘iha‘l’, ’i'his \pe'i'i‘iion is disposed of in ‘ihe same farms. No order as ’i'o cosfs. i 3' Sd/- 3‘ J Satish K. Agnihotri > Judge r‘ i Subhash ‘