IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W. P. (CR.) N0. OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ^ , /V3V^<S/'A>' siM^ ^>.. w,v -h^-- 2. ' .f 3. 4. 5. Jidhan Singh Rathiya S/o Late Shri Udayraj Singh Rathiya, §iged about 47 years, R/o Village-Tundri, Police Station-Dabhra, Tahsil-Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Chanipa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through-The Secretary Department of Home Ministry Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). The Superintendent of Police, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Police Station Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Collector Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer 1 i^ I-HC:-22 sn^i'^t h-u* sv^v ^fli^' ^fl^T p R E c T5ET -llltlM'4, ^Ti1'yil<i. r«<c'll'M1<; 31T^?T TpT^ .^.:2.:..!L'T.)..y^?... •5-53. &/11' 'fN^T" sii^i'^giWHfOT SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 28-04.2011 Shri Dharmesh Shrivasteva, cc Shri Arvind Kumar Dubey, By this petition, the petitioner respondents to lodge report and dated 13/12/10 (Annexure P/1) again^ Submission of teamed couns No.7, whiteWorking as Sarpanch serious irreguiariCes while remainingl submitted that on the complaint reported to the Sub-DMsional Offlc] who after hearing respondent No.7, passed an orderon 13/12/2010, holi] the matter of operation of public dist( are essential commodities. On such was cancelled in exercise of power^ System (Control) Order 2004 ancj prosecution against respondent No.7| The grievance of ttie petiiionsji Oificer passed anorder for inifiating steps towards initiation of such prcj! have not been initiated till date. Taking into consideration that| on the part of the respondent representation ts made by the the matter would be tooked into and t< ^T^ICI^I ^IH^ll' ^ f^^l <^1+$K ^;3lfigiT3n^I IShrivasteiva. >j. (unsel fbr the peUtioner. . Pan^l Lawyer for the State. |has prayed for issuance of direction to inve^tigate the allegations contained in order ^t respondent No.7. 5^1 for the peUtloner is that respondent K Gram Panchayat, Tundri committed lin charge ofthefare priceshops. It is m^de by the petitioner, the matter was Offlcfer, Revenue, Dabhra, Janjgir-Champa, against whom complaints were made, fing hlm guiHy of serious irregulariUes in ibution system of rice, sugar ete., which linding, the allotmente offare price shops under Chhattisgarh Public Distrlbution a dlrection was Issued for initeting is ttiat even though the Sub-Divfeionai >rosecution against respondent No.7, the jsecutlon by the concerned respondent the grievance oftfte petitioner is inacfion autl|iorities, it is directed that in case, the petiti^ner to respondent No.4 - the Coliector, tespondent No.4 shall take such steps as [^tfeii aSpnf BABisBAuqS ueqoW e-IPUIUBW -/PS Afetu •yo pssodsipAiieuys! uoRBed eifl "MBI eifl^epun iui4 0} eiqejiBAe eq o»Aveqi| }B sq pjnow jeuoiuied eqt 'jept I.U04 'sinuouu ssjiftio pousd e unw»us|»|Bt tsureBe uoiiae 1.0 janeui eqi ui '*B| aifl 4 li^lte hP-Jte ^. >li»l«J>piSJ [t JUlhlh l.|l>U]b|ll> si|ioi»BAjesqopiesejo^e eifl 4»yiA se 'Apauiaj qons o} esjnooaj e?|e} (o eui p Actoo 10 idisoej y> eiep ein Sl UOjpB OU H 'Z"°N tuepuodssj ^pun siqissiuuad pue Aiesseoeu sje ildaaQ .sc uaj^ t^)ht*s lt^lK> tb'll-b] lifelt^UE .te><»f] OOZ '1-1»......._............................'<:>1>«BlUhlh l/'&'S^fi •^^•^c^ ^Kta. l^S >'RH.IUI») •ai,»(ll®'h.UIMh- &£. fi-.IH-] yss?ss^'^^s^.^^.s^