IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19220 of 2010 NAVIN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.02.2010 in a case registered under Sections 395, 397 of the I.P.C. Petitioner’s name sprang up on the confession of one Pinku Chaudhary @ Pankaj Chaudhary. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner’s name sprang up on the basis of confessional statement of one Pinku Chaudhary @ Pankaj Chaudhary who has been granted bail which is apparent from the Sessions Judge order itself and a computer report also reflects as such. It is further submitted that there is no recovery from the petitioner and moreover petitioner has no criminal antecedent and a statement to that effect has also been made in paragraph No. 11 of the petition. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that petitioner’s involvement has come during investigation. Considering the aforesaid submissions, for 2 the purposes of bail only, let the petitioner namely Navin Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 35 of 2009. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)