IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.1006 of 2010 Date of Decision : 9.12.2010 Balwant Singh alias Bant Singh ....Petitioner Versus Nachhattar Kaur and ors. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.A.S.Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Om Pal Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to 7. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3.9.2009. He contends that the respondents are trying to alienate the property and are trying to raise construction thereon and that he being a co- owner is entitled to protect his possession. He further contends that the injunction has wrongly been declined to him. Learned counsel for respondents No.1, 2 and 4 to 7, on the other hand, contends that the dispute is within the family. The petitioner is the only one who is questioning the status of respondent No.1 as the wife of Bahadur Singh. He contends that earlier the said respondent was married to Gurdev Singh who died and thereafter Karewa ceremony was performed by the family in the presence of C.R.No.1006 of 2010 -2- number of persons which has been admitted by the other family members. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the instant revision petition is without merit. The prayer of the petitioner, which is limited to the extent that the alienation be stayed, is misconceived, as the same would be hit by the principle of lis pendens which may be attracted in the eventuality of any sale or alienation being made by the said respondents. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 9.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss