- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1090 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1090 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1090 OF 2004 Ramesh Hariram Rohira. .. Plaintiff. .. Plaintiff. .. Plaintiff. v/s. v/s. v/s. A.C.P.Industries & Anr. .. Defendants. .. Defendants. .. Defendants. Ms. Parvathy Kaushik i/b B.S.Chandnani, advocate for plaintiffs. CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2004 DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2004 DATE : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2004. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . The suit is on board for Exparte Hearing. The advocate for the plaintiff is present. She has filed affidavit of service as per which defendants are duly served. She has also filed original documents. Nobody is present for defendants. Under these circumstances, the suit stands decreed as prayed for with 12 % future interest from the date of the order till realisation and costs. Permissible court fee be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. Permission is granted to the plaintiff to take back original documents by substituting xerox copies of the same after appeal - 2 - period is over. Certified copy expedited.