IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2010 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 800 of 2010() ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN MACA.893/2010 Dated 08/06/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------- S.SANTHY, W/O SUNDARARJAN SOUTH PAVADI, KOLLENGODE PO PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. SATHEESH BABU, S/O.KRISHNAN KUNISSERY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD – 678 541. 2. A.NARAYANAN, S/O.APPU NILAMPATHI HOUSE, ALUVASSERY, KUNISSERY PO,PALAKKAD – 678 541. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD' BRANCH OFFICE, G.B.ROAD,PALAKKAD – 678 001. R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ M.N.KRISHNAN, J -------------------------------- R.P.NO.800 OF 2010 -------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of December, 2010 ORDER This is an application to review the judgment dated 08-06-2010. The grievance of the review petitioner is that the policy being a comprehensive policy, there is unlimited coverage and therefore, the liability to third party damages to the property cannot be restricted to Rs.6,000/- alone. Comprehensive policy is issued for damages to his own property, damages to the property of third party as well as the personal injury. Unless additional premium is paid with respect to unlimited coverage of a third party's property the statutory liability is only Rs.6,000/- and nothing more. There are absolutely no materials to prove the same. Therefore, it has to be held that there is no error apparent on the face of the record which calls for a review under Section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code. Therefore, the review petition is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN,JUDGE pm