WfV l)"l':'!.li:i!';'.!l:Et c IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P._(SL , _S^3'2C .of_20Q9 Petitioner: ~rt:" Respgndents ^ v)y^ ^M^ ^ww^ ^ ASHOKKUMAR UKEY, S/oLateShri K. R. Ukey, aged about 47 years, Accountant in theofBce of theShamudaik Shwastha Kendra Balod, r/o near the Schedule Tribe Hostel Balod Dist. Durg(C.G.) , Versus ^ : 1. StateofChhattisgarh, Throiigh :- The Secretary, Health and Fenuly Welfare Department, D.K.S. BhawanRaipur(C.G.) The Director Health Services, Du-ectorate of Healfh Seryices Raipur, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^3< The Chief Medical and Health OfEcerDurg, Dist. Dui^ [C.G.] ^WRTT_REyiTraoNUNDERAlmCl^226^ INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRH' IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAM,PITOHABITAIG)N,etc.ANI^y>(»iF6RORDERANE)/ OR DIECTIONyBIRECTTONSlNNATURE^QPWRlT: 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: * Aspertitle.. . 1 ' ' : , :, • ,-.-, 2. PARTICULARS OP THE RESPONDENTS: yss Aspertitle.. •• ; . ; ;• '• 1;: :,:;''' .^"y.- ^~y/ :'<^" t>»v' iiiii i'-i- \\ 3~ST -^i<4!~!A|. 0TltM<|iS. --<~{i.H4< ^.^.P.L^.^&q^. W[200ef 3n^T'In^? ('i^'K.3;' an^t'wft'iw ^sn' ^v^ ih*i' TOi!w:InCT3'^w -f.i-.'iWR'W^V'i ~a Tg'TT (i .1^i<. ^T stRti •3WRT Shri Vijay Deshmukh couns^ Shri Yashwant Singh respondents/State. for the petitioner. Thakur Dy. AG for the Challenge in this petition ^ to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by respondent No.1 by wijiich the petltioner v/ho is working on the post of Accountant af Corr|munity Health Centre,-Balod has been transferred to Community (jiealth Centre, Navagarh, District Contention of the counsel fjsr the petifioner is that the place where petitioner has been transft •red, one M.L. Manker is aiready v/orking and thus there is no vaca^t post of accounfant. He submits that v/ife of fhe petitioner is aisoj a govemment employee and is Vt'orking as teacher at Governrjient Higher Secondary Schooi, Jhalmaia, Balod. He submits t^at on these two grounds the Jmpugned transfer order is liable toj be set aside. Counsel for the responddnts/State submits that let the petitioner make a suitable representation to the authorities concerned which would be decideM in accordance with law. To this j proposition of the State counse!, counsel for the petitioner showed his agreement. However, he prays for an interim protecfion tilf the M,: ^^r'iT.if^T:?TT^—i-S/95—-I i /20()8—1.0i'.0l^i. ^',,f-«<1,8,. l',<s<*t fW^.. 3 r.,? TST'=;H?T[^TT. ®Tll^'i'S,FTCTXPT?: .-.^.-(?X.^..3£.f.';2- 200'? aiR'ff'q^? (• 3ni^iwS!TW WIT an^r w:ri^ •?<i'-^^T1 '^[tf?fT''^ f^3"t 'H^g^ ^r vfw 3!it?i representation of the petitioner j is decided by the authorities concerned. Accordingiy, the petition is c^isposed of with a direction that if the; pgtltiop^makes a represent^ion to the authorities concerned withiR^'j^T^ of 10 days from tite date of receipt of copy of this ..'^^i;-"';'l-;^jsi:r "' -- --,- ..-.-. ..^. order;' the-'a&thorities concerned fehall decide the same within a further period of three weeks from |he date of its receipt. Ti!l then the ordeF'rmpugffed shall be kept in at^eyance so far as it relates to the petitioner. i - ''——— • Sd/- Pririnker Diwakar Judge—— •^T^T^^T^iTT7?—S-S/ii3—-5 1/2i';OK-—i.00. Ot'O