[C-22 3?n^i^'r (<•<(<*»^^ a»*tich^a ^^ ^I^H^I, ^Tl1<141<o, f^<y11<iy ^...^:)..m^3, Nl^dl 5bz|jcb'"'^:JY^^7"y^wv"wsg^ 200 'f^ST' ^TI^T'^HW^f^ PETITIONER: K.K| Sethi, Aged 57 years, S/o Late Shri R.Pl Sethi, Working as Section Officer at Chllattisgarh Pubiic Service Commission, Raij?ur, District C-32, Sector -1, Shankar Na^ar, Raipur, Oistrict Raipur (CG) RESPONDENTS -\. Sta Sec De| Rai te of Chhattisgarh, through the Iretary, General Administration ^artment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, bur(CG) Th4 Chhattlsgarh Infrastructure De^elopment Corporation, Through the Mahaging Director, Chhattlsgarh, H.Q. Rafcur. 3. Th' Co Se (C<t$ (Writ Petition under Artjcle) Sinale Bench : Hon'bl 10-12-2008:- Shri R.K. Kesharwani,coun^ Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advoc^ Heard. The petitioner was empioye^ Corporation (for short lthe Corpo|ratlon'). transferred on deputation with res^ondent The State Government vide order| <^N?<n<flr1 'WTOf ^ ft^ iFal^K '^3rf;<m3TI^T ersus- Chhattisgarh Public Service Raipur, Through the retary, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur Cotnmission, 226 ofthe Constitution of india) Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. ^el for the petitioner. bte for the State. of erstwhile M.P. State Road Transport The petitioner's services were No.3 Pubiic Service Commission. [dated 13th August. 2008 (Aannexure-P/5) ,^^^ HC-22 '75? ^INId^l. ^nl'y^Ko. f^^Kiy STI^T 'tRT^ NIHCT Sb*1ich "V^ 200 'fa^sr' 3?T^T'^T R;ilq»^^ sii*iw ^Ra Barve L'- 3n^?T'^RTTW;Frf^T -^-1 filfed servictes t'ramed the ruies for absorption of Corporation. Respondent No.3 v| requested the respondent State fo^ empioyees of the Corporation pof absence of any expressed permissi< of the petitioner could not be absor^t Thls petition has been authorities for absorption of Annexure-P/5 dated 13th August, Learned counsel for the Statj thls petltion the petltioner stands r{ 2008 and, therefore, the instant p^t lapseoftlme. The above fact is not dispute^ in that view of the matter, th^ infructuous. <=bt^t<!i<fll ^H<rff'? f^^ <Pn^i< i73rf^W3TI^T the services of employees of erstwhite |de memo dated 16th May, 2008 had granting permission for absorption of sted on deputation. However, in the >n by the respondent/State, the services ed by the Pubiic Service Commission. for direction to the respondents of the petitioner as per circular of 2d08 submitted that during the pendency of rtired from services on 30th November, •tition has become infructuous with the by Searned counsel for the petitioner. petition is djsmissed as having become Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge