1 Cr application No.243 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No.243 Of 2011 In Criminal Revision Application No.337 Of 2009 Rafiyabee w/o. Parvez Qureshi And Others. .. Applicants. Versus Parvez Qureshi s/o Jamil Qureshi. .. Respondent. -------- Shri. Deepak S. Manorkar, Advocate, for applicants. -------- CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 24th JUNE 2011 PER COURT : 1) Heard Mr. Manorkar, learned counsel for the applicants. 2) A revision against the order of maintenance is moved by the husband. In the said revision, subject application for withdrawal of amount is made by the wife. However, in spite of revisional petitioner being represented by an Advocate, the service in the present application is 2 Cr application No.243 of 2011 not honoured / accepted. This exercise is unheard of. The wife has ensured service through process of Court and even by Registered Post AD. However, a systematic go-by is given to such notice. The conduct of the revisional petitioner is apathetic and unconceivable. 3) The just demand of the wife is for withdrawal of the amount deposited by the husband before the learned Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad in proceedings No.E-25/2009 wherein the learned Judge had granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.2000/- per month. 4) Considering the above facets of the matter, the amount so far deposited by the revisional petitioner before the learned Judge Family Court be paid over to the wife applicant Rafiyabee on identification of her Advocate and on surety furnished by her before the said Family Court. The application is allowed. Sd/- (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) rsl