IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30542 of 2010 MD.SAMSUL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 03. 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, Union of India and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 10.09.2009 in connection with complain case no. 6699 of 2009 arising out of N.D.P.S. Case No. 86 of 2009 registered under Sections 20(b) (ii)(c),21,23(C) read with Section 29 of the N. D. P. S. Act. It is alleged that 4468 Kg. of Ganja was recovered from the truck. The petitioner happens to be cleaner of the said truck. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no knowledge about the alleged contraband in the truck and has never been implicated in any case. Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India filed counter affidavit and submits that the quantity is much more than the prescribed commercial quantity under the Act and complicity of petitioner being present as cleaner in the truck in question can not be ruled out. 2 Considering the huge quantity beyond commercial level prescribed under the Act, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail application of the petitioner is rejected. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)