1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.545/2009 (Shanta Begani Vs. State & Ors.) Date of order : 27.01.2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. N.S. Acharya, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Admittedly, in this case the proceedings were initiated for acquiring the land which is situated in Khasra No.29 and an award has been passed for the land situated in Khasra No.29. A contention has been raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that the land of the petitioner is situated in Khasra No.29/1. In my opinion, when the proceedings were initiated for the land situated in Khasra No.29 and admittedly, as per contention of the petitioner, her land is not situated in Khasra No.29, therefore, the petitioner cannot raise any voice against the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer for land situated in Khasra No.29. 2 However, if any dispute with regard to land exists and any contravention has been made by the Land Acquisition Officer, Bikaner then the petitioner is free to avail remedy provided under the law because disputed questions of fact cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction without recording evidence. Therefore, no case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is made out. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun