IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH JUNE 2008 / 30TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 18603 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- A. NALINI, AGED 56 YEARS, CHANDRIKA, THAMARACHIRA, NATTUKAL P.O., CHITTOOR TALUK PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE RESPONDENTS: ------------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THEKKEDESOM VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK,PALAKKAD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHITTUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.18603 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed Ext.P6 application before the 2 nd respondent aggrieved by the orders of the 1 st respondent cancelling the possession certificate issued to the petitioner. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. If the orders to be passed by the 2 nd respondent are likely to affect other persons, those persons shall also be afforded an opportunity of being heard. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 2 nd respondent for compliance. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd