(5)) W Z $Bga§3§e3 Eaamh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)N0. ‘53QQ5 /2009 VI/ Abdul Habib Quraishi, S/o. Shri AB. Quaraishi, Aged about 47 years; R/o. MIG—1027, Hudco Bhilai‘ Distfict Durg (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1] ”Sftate of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department 0f Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2] Joint Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3] (gnu. Priti Shanna, Librarian, Govt. College Patan, Durg, District Durg (CG) PETITIONER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HEGH COURT 0.3? CHEATTESGARH Afr BILAS?UR SB 1 HON’BLE SHRI JU$T§C££RETENKER DIWAKEE‘E wgghggo 3393;29Qg PE’R‘ITE6WER Abdul Habib Quraishi Versus RESPONDENTS tats of (1G. €55 Others WM? PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 DF THE CON$TIT$TION OF iE‘DIA sQmwarange: Shri Sumesh Bajaj, GA, with. Me SLmitaJain, P.L..for the State. Shn‘ Manoj Paranjape, counsel for the petitioner. om ORBER (13.c7.2009) Challenge in the present petition is t0 the order datec} 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/ l) passed by reepondent No.2 whereby the petiticner has been transferred at the cost of respondent No.3 who is coming on his own request. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not completed his normal tenure of three years and therefore also the transfer order is bad. Counsel for the State submits that let the petitioner make a representation to the respondent No.2 and in turn the representation would be decided by the competent authority considering all the factual aspects of the case. in view of above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation to the authorities Within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of this order and in the eventuatity of making any such representation, the same would be decided expeditiousty within a period of three weeks from the date of its receiot. ’f . ,1 Pritinker Diwaker " " Judge \S‘i 1’ ‘ I Sd/— f i \\\,