IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2521 of 2008 Date of Decision:- 01.05.2008 Babu Singh ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate vs. Amrik Singh ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This civil revision is directed against the order dated 11.2.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Division), Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby an application moved by the petitioner-plaintiff for appointment of a Local Commissioner has been dismissed. The learned trial Court has observed that since the respondent- defendant does not dispute raising of construction over the disputed piece of land, the question as to whether such construction has been raised by him on the encroached land would be decided on the basis of evidence to be led by the parties. Having regard to the nature of the suit, the learned trial Court has rightly observed that the question as to whether the said construction has been raised by the respondent-defendant after filing of the suit or prior thereto is of no consequence. There is, thus, no legal necessity to appoint a C.R. No.2521 of 2008 -2- Local Commissioner to visit the spot. No interference with the impugned order is called for. Dismissed. May 01, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE