. K x x \ \ x x. - ER Kn, Mamta D/o. :IN’ THE HIGH ccum‘ OF JUDICATURE AT' JABALPUR.(MP) WRIT 'pETITIQN‘No$.3 (77 OF 2000 x“ shri K.R. Pandeyé Aged about 30 years, ¥ R/O. Rajapara Séranggarh, Distt.- RAIGARP( MP) . . VERSUS éz RESPCNBENTS l. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Managing Director} M.P. Krishi vipran Board, BhOpal. The Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Saranggarh Through sécretary, Collector, Raigarh, The state of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary, x ,Department of Agriculture, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CGNSTITHTION ,OF INDIA WRITS,OREER$ OR EIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI ,MANDAIEUS ANQ ETC. ANE‘FCR FURTHR APPROPRIATE BIRECTIONS: . ’ ;xi , / 1 #a‘r/I’; , ..... , WWW my mm wm émimm ET' mm lav1Q 3&1 “"1112006 31m W (We) WWW $3 : HON‘ELE SHE! JUSTECE F‘RETEK‘KER BEWAKER 19.0?.2Q09 Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner Shri Ya$hwamt ,Singh Th5 1 85 2. 3 Shri Arvind Dubey, counsel for respondent No.! Counsd for the D€tition raiates to the illegal termination ‘time the petitioner was workin subsequently some circuiars hz and in View of these circulars, a petition with a iiberty to fi1e rep} Krishi Vinanan Board, Rainuri no objection if the petitioner makes Counsel for the State has such reoresentation. He furtl'ier submits that the case of the petitioner is hopelessly barr ;he authority would be at liberty to consider each and every aspect df the case. Be that as it may, in the eventuality of filing representation by the petitioner within a period of kur, Dy. AG. for the State/respl No. 2r submits that the oresent matter of the netitioner and at the relevant g on daily wages l—le submits that. ive been issued by the Government . this stage he Wants to Withdraw the esentation to the Managing Director, 3d by limitation therefore while considering the representation ‘our weeks from the date of receipt of this order, the same would be decided by the competentt‘authority strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with the aforesaid ‘2‘ 1t is being made ciear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case an ibertV. :1 the authority would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. /