IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23648 of 2010 AKHILESH YADAV @ AKUA @ AKU SON OF MOKIL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated 9.12.2009 vide Cr.Misc.No.42239 of 2009 with a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial. From the documents annexed here with the petition it appears that the informant was also examined during trial but he did not identify the petitioner, who was present in court. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 31.7.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, Biharsharif in Sare P.S.case No.60 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors shall be the father/brother of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case - 2 - and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )