IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1398 of 2007 Kripa Nath Jha & Ors Versus Shankar Jha & Anr ----------- 5 21-7-2011 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. By the impugned order the court below has rejected the prayer of the petitioners to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 C.P.C. with liberty to file a fresh suit. The plaintiff- petitioners had submitted in the court below that they had filed the suit in the representative capacity, but had failed to obtain the permission,as required under Order 1 Rule 8 C.P.C. and therefore in view of this technical lacuna, they sought to withdraw the suit. The learned court below has recorded a finding that this suit has been filed by the plaintiffs with regard to their claim over Plot No. 2013 which has been recorded as ‘Gairmazura Khas’ in the record of right. It has been further found by the court below in the impugned order that earlier the plaintiff-petitioners had unsuccessfully moved before the High Court in C.R.No. 288 of 2005. On the basis of these facts the learned court below has rejected the prayer of the plaintiff-petitioners.I do not find any jurisdictional error or 2 illegality in the impugned order. The revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. roy ( V. Nath, J.)