EV THE HON'BLE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETmONNC^^/2006. IENGI- PETITIONER ,ol9...--'" ^^. ^-^SMF^ ^y 0-' ^ <ft RESPONDENTS : Vinit Kumar Sinha S/o Late Shri. Vinod Kumar Sinha Aged around 36 years, Unemployed Residina at: C/o Qr. No. 11 Ward No. 11, Mohan Nagar, DURG-490001 (CG). VERSUS 1. STEEL AUTHORITY OFINDIA LTD, Tbrough : Its Chairman, Steel Authority oflndia Ltd. Lodhi Road, Ispat Bhawan, NEW DELHI-110011. 2. BmLAI STEEL PLANT, Through : Its Managing Director, Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). 3. TheManager . (Personnel - Management) Bhilai Steel Plant, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, IVIANDAIVIUS ETC. 'r' .A^ ISBBIU sqt ui jepj<p eq} }Q uoi}e3!|dde 34} jspisuoo o) pspgjip •(usiuiuioddB stBuoissediuoo jo^ jauoi}j»gd| eqt ys e}ids ui psjspisuoo Buieq (ou si jeu4 'iusuituiodde eteuoissediuoo uo p9}uiodde punojG JBIIIUIS uo »eq} psn.iiuqns jouoiuadl •luaiujuioddB eteuoili sy} 'S}u©puodsaisyi Buipnioui A}uoi|}nv |9S|| q,6Z PsteP ^usiueajBv p uinpueuouiei^ 9i|) | p eseo 84) pejepisuoo }ou SABIJ s^uapuodse^ usA3 '6661.-Z-85 uo ABAe psssed j8UO!)!}s<) •(£-d sjnxsuuv) 8661.-01.-Z1. psiep uofleoiit .isuoi}!iad 8i(i •jsuoi)4od 34} jo (usiuiuiodd) ue pSHjiuqns jei)}ej s.jsuo.qiied eifl 'siseq eiff uio^ p9A9i|sj seA JSIBB} s,jeuoffi}sd sifl 'li janei p-ieog |eo!psy\| epiA qof aq} joj lyun^ets!): -y 84 'A|S}EuiB|n pue SUIB BUO| e joj [qidsoi-i e|-j •ssessip uiejq tuoj^ psjsyns jeuoiijied 'ieijtjg 'jopeg |B}idso|-i '(00433 o(ppi|/\| te pa^' iue|d fesis !e|it|g ^o lueiuyBdea uoiiesnp; sem jsuoaRed sqt jo jsyie^ gq) ieq} si •punojB jBoipeui uo eqt }o ^unoooe uo }U3Ui}uioddB e}Buoissedtu|30 jspisuoo o} pe}os.ijp sq g'o(\| (uspuodsej ie{^ fi U0!)n»f}suoo94} ^o /SZ/9ZZ 3|0!VV -ispun •jsuoitiied sif} JO.; jas( »^4I l^llphyift^. •>l'^>]y> P'&l.t'.ll-'hlh >.(|!.]-ijfr]» eteudojdde ssed pue jsuoiissd |eq S}uepuodse.i 041 'ajo^sjeifi gij} /q psftfiuqns uoneoiidde tffffsd 84} p sseo sij( 'sesjeijM |uosq SABL) suo&isd p jsquinu |sijt jo^ fssunoo psujes^ !|ssediuoo jo.) psffi}ue si j3UO!}i)sd tg 94) ui siqeojidde 'Qi@i, 'A|nr |jsd se 'sesjstiM 'jsuoi}!}sd eq} St)} 'sjesA /-9 jo ssdej eq}jsye eqi p jeyjEj sy} 'A|S}eun}jo^un jlde ue penjiuqns OS|B tissiuiy ^ e^euoissedtuoo jo^ uoiieo.iidde uo pue 966J.-S-61- uo ssi}np leijiuopsseg •gssi.-t'-es p3»ep lusuEiujsd psje]osp sem |©8}S!®1!M8le psiesfl SBM |sqi y> .isqie^ eqt 'Aiiusnbssqng jsod sem pue (S'ON tuepuodssj) eyt ui jeqoeei se paAo|duis ei<} y> sseo ei<i s,jsuo!t!}ed sq} p lusiusjiisj Jio} J8uoi}!}9d eij) p SSBO et|{ peAejd seq jeuosffed 941 'eipui i(oBi}ed }U/IA }UG}SU! 04} Ag (inoo 'oey •d-g •jy\f PJBSH IBplpSlftl WBId je<ioi}!isd js^e^ 906Z-9-6i. ii;yh-u3jf»»ii»a (lAbPjA) tbfch li!^l>e ^QQt 'iB.. .^t^,..r.^ •• fjhis ll^hlh .'o ~~ >R»IW|s[ '°>lrft|p.e 'hl->IMh- lap .^ <fclhKSI);blK>]fciU ibll-y llfe I^IK. 82.-3H-K XI-HC-78 HWMI !»»*<!cb 3^ •<||<IK'I'M, »Tf1y'is,RiMiuy ^_ is^.^g^ ^ 200^, 3ll^i <4a<»> (lci(3°«<tT) 3n^?Tw R^i* tWT3n^STsht< ^ c\. Soma \ '' ^ v ?RnwHfN'3ii^'?T ^+ Having heard learned cou| the petition and the documents, fair and reasonable. Therefore, r| application submitted by the peti| pass final order on the applicatio compassionate appointment, in No.1. With the direction aforesaid Parties are entitled for i^isel for the petitioner and having perused tfie prayer made by learned counsel is just, ^spondent No.3 is directed to scrutinize the i|tioner for compassionate appointment and ^i considering the case of the petitioner for |accordance with the policy of respondent certified <tinFf1<fl-f 1l>lClTffteIA<('a|«;K ^sri^iTsn^r , the petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. Sd/- » L.C. Bhadoo Judge