-: 1 :- CP-328/99 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 328 OF 1999 Balisha Arjun Honmore. ..Petitioner. Versus Mahadeo Arjuna Honomore and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Sagar Mane i/b Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar for the petitioner. Mr. S. T. Rairkar for R-1 to 4. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 11, 2011. P. C. : 1. After hearing both sides, this Court [Coram : A.S.Oka,J.] has passed a detailed order on 3/12/2011 holding respondent nos. 1 to 4 guilty of committing civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. They are sentenced to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each and to undergo simple imprisonment for the period of one month. However, on the same day undertakings came to be filed by Respondent nos.2, 3 & 4 that they will abide the the order in respect of which the contempt was alleged. Respondent no.1 could not file undertaking within two weeks, however, he has shown sufficient cause for delay. Therefore, his undertaking is also accepted. 2. In view of the Undertakings given by the Respondents, Court suspended the sentence of simple imprisonment till 11/3/2011 and srp -: 2 :- CP-328/99 granted time to the respondents till 11/3/2011 to comply with the undertakings. In clause no.7 of the operative of the said order, it was made clear that if respondent nos.1 to 4 do not comply with the Undertakings on or before 10/3/2011, they will have to undergo the substantive sentence and if compliance is made, then substantive sentence of simple imprisonment will stand set aside. 3. On 9/3/2011, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have filed separate affidavits. These affidavits disclose that the Undertakings given by each of them are complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction of his client, who is present in the Court, also submitted that respondent nos. 1 to 4 have complied with the Undertakings given by them. 4. In their respective affidavits, respondent nos. 1 to 4 have given undertakings to this court that they will not indulge in any act leading to the breach of the order of this Court passed in Civil Application No. 5422 of 1995 in First Appeal No. 5422 of 1995 and they will scrupulously abide by that order. These undertakings of respondent nos. 1 to 4 are accepted. 5. In the light of aforesaid position and further undertakings -: 3 :- CP-328/99 given by respondent nos. 1 to 4, I am satisfied that respondent nos. 1 to 4 – contemnors have complied with the undertakings mentioned above. In the circumstances, nothing survives for consideration in the contempt petition and same is therefore disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)