1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION No.433 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1740/2009 (Santosh Bhaurao Bhuyar ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Anil S. Mardikar, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri A.S. Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 3, Shri S.M. Puranik, Advocate for respondent No.2, Shri S.C. Mehadia, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 & 5, CORAM:- D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED :- 11-03-2011 Heard Shri S.C. Mehadia, learned Counsel for the applicant- respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Learned Counsel for applicant-respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has submitted that these applicants-respondents are aggrieved by the order passed by the State Government on the representation of the petitioner, in view of directions issued by this Court vide order dated 11/10/2010 passed in the present writ petition and therefore, the petitioner has filed this civil application in the present petition questioning the validity of the order passed by the State Government. Since the applicants-respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in this 2 application are questioning the validity of the order passed by the State Government, we permit the applicants-respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to withdraw the present civil application with liberty to file a fresh petition in this regard. Civil application is disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.648 OF 2011. Heard Shri Anil S. Mardikar, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri A.S. Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 3, Shri S.M. Puranik, Advocate for respondent No.2 and Shri S.C. Mehadia, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 & 5. This application is for extension of time to decide the representation of the petitioner. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the communication dated 19/1/2011 issued by the State Government addressed to the Director of Education shows that the decision is already taken by the State Government in this regard. In that view of the matter, we dispose of the present civil application. JUDGE JUDGE pma