IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5907 of 2011 JITENDRA SAH AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner no. 1 being the husband and petitioner no.2 being the second wife of petitioner no.1 are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 304B of the I.P.C. The marriage was performed in 2004 and occurrence took place in 2008. During investigation, accusation was found false and final form was submitted but on protest cognizance has been taken. Since petitioner no.1,Jitendra Sah is husband, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.1, Jitendra Sah. His anticipatory bail application is rejected. So far petitioner no.2 is concerned, since she is lady, let petitioner no.2, Puja Devi be released on bail in the event of 2 arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. C1-61/10 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.Ist Class, Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)