1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No.3680/1998 K. I. Khan -vs- The Dairy Manager, Govt. Milk Scheme and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : JUNE 25, 2010. The petitioner moved the Labour Court, Amravati under Sec.33 (C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He claimed that he was working with the non-applicant No.1 (Respondent here) as a driver. He was not paid for the overtime work of driving having attended the duties by visiting Mumbai. Inspite of repeated demands, the non-applicant (Respondent) failed to pay the amount. The Learned Member directed the authorities (Respondent) to pay overtime wages for the work done as shown in column No.11 of Exhibit-20 to 72 regarding his visits to Akola to Mumbai. However, the Learned Presiding Officer declined for so called overtime wages for his visits to Nagpur. The report of Shri Babrekar indicated the wages to be Rs.4,473.57 paise and these calculations are not disputed by the parties which the 2 learned counsel for the respondents informed he is remitted long back, as visible the petitioner the employee has not yet put any grievance from 11/06/1998 or in the present writ petition. The writ petition questions the non grant of the benefit of so called overtime which is certainly a disputed question of fact, need not be exercised in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. I do not see any merit in the writ petition, dismissed. JUDGE Khunte.