IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2007 / 28TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 6362 of 2005(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. JAYANTHI MOHANAN W/O. MOHANAN, AGED 37 YEARS, PERUKILAMTHITTAYIL, THALAYOLAPPARAMBU P.O. 2. MOHANAN S/O. KRISHNAN, AGED 39 YEARS, PERUKILAMTHITTAYIL, THALAYOLAPPARAMBU P.O. 3. KRISHNANKUTTI, MARKOKUZHIYILAYA KOCHUTHARAYIL, VADAYAR P.O. 4. SIJIMOL W/O. C.K.SUKUMARAN, AGED 42 YEARS, NIKARTHIL HOUSE, VADAYAR P.O. 5. RADHAMANI W/O. KRISHNANKUTTI, MARKOKUZHIYILAYA KOCHUTHARAYIL, VADAYAR P.O. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ THALAYOLAPPARAMBU FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.278, THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY / THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 6362/2005 : 2 : APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 18.01.2005. EXT.P1(a): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 18.01.2005. EXT.P1(b): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 18.01.2005. EXT.P1(c): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 18.01.2005. EXT.P1(d): TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH PETITIONER DATED 18.01.2005. EXT.P2: TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 35/2003 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DATED 01.07.2003. /True Copy/ P.A to Judge. KURIAN JOSEPH , J ================================== W.P.(C) NO. 6362 OF 2005 ================================== Dated this the 19th day of July, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioners approached this Court with certain grievances regarding recovery steps initiated against them. They claim that they are entitled to the benefit of Ext.P2. It is for the petitioners to approach the respondent, in which case, their eligibility in the light of Ext.P2 will be considered by the respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. rv