IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1793 of 2006 MOST.SHARDA DEVI @ RESHAM DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 10.2.2010. Mr. Shiv Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Dipak Kumar learned Assisting Counsel to G.P.16 and Mr. Vivekanand Kunwar learned counsel for the Accountant General are present. The petitioner who is the widow of late Gaya Sharma has filed the writ petition for payment of the retiral dues as admissible to her late husband who expired on 21.12.2000. It is submitted that the husband of the petitioner superannuated as Sanitary Inspector with effect from 31.10.2000 and two months thereafter he expired. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State enclosing a copy of the order passed in C.W.J.C.No.12772 of 2000. The said writ petition was filed by the late husband of the present petitioner upon non acceptance of his joining after he returned from completing his training. Unfortunately, during the pendency of the proceedings, the husband of the present 2 petitioner late Gaya Sharma expired and consequent whereof, an interlocutory application bearing I.A.No.8882 of 2007 was filed for substitution of the name of the present petitioner in the said proceedings and which was allowed. In view of the said development, the writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the respondent authorities to examine and expedite the payment of the retiral dues of the substituted petitioner of the said case and who is the petitioner in the present proceedings. It was further directed that the entire exercise be completed within a period of three months from the date of the order. In the counter affidavit, it is stated that in compliance of the order passed by a Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C.No.12772 of 2000, the petitioner was given payment towards the GPF amount of Rs.24,118/-, group insurance amount of Rs.8798/-, gratuity amount of Rs.1,37,264/- and the pension was also sanctioned by the Accountant General. Having regard to the circumstances that the admissible payments have been made by the 3 authorities, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise her grievance before the authority concerned, if she is aggrieved by any of the calculation made. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.)