IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.672 of 2009 BILO YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.4.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment dated 19.10.2006 passed in Criminal Appeal No.90 of 1992 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Begusarai whereby he confirmed the conviction of the petitioner under section 325/34 of the Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for four years. However, the Appellate Court acquitted the petitioner of charge under section 379 of the Penal Code. The prosecution case in short is that the petitioner assaulted the informant Deoki Choudhary with stones on account of which he lost his sight. In this case, the injured died during the pendency of the trial. It appears from the evidence of P.W.7 Dr. Purshottam Mishra that the injured suffered grievous injuries as a result of which he lost his sight. The petitioner has filed a limitation petition for condoning the delay of 802 days in filing of this revision application. It appears that after the judgment of the Appellate Court,the petitioner did not surrender. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was unaware of the judgment in appeal and got no 2 KHAN information from his lawyer. He further submits that the petitioner was engaged in treatment and operation of his wife. This court does not find any satisfactory explanation to condone the delay, and as such the limitation petition is fit to be rejected. As a consequence, this revision application stands dismissed on this count alone. (S.P.Singh,J)