IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1110 of 2007 ANIL SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.07.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order dated 31.5.2007 passed by Sri B. K. Verma, ADJ(FTC V), Banka in Criminal Appeal No. 77 of 2006/ Trial No. 2 of 2007 thereby the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 391 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. I have gone through the impugned order. It appears that the petitioners filed a petition for admitting kewala standing in their name as additional evidence. The reasons assigned by the learned appellate Court appears to be justified as the kewala in question was already in possession of the petitioners-accused but for the reasons best known to them the same was not produced before the trial court. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order under the revisional jurisdiction. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is hereby dismissed. However, Court below is directed to expedite the disposal of the case. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)