•El •^ (^Y's^— IN THE HONTBLE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No.^3^- /2010 PETITIONER / <-¥ Dr. Smt. P.R. Basanta, aged about 56 years, W/o. Shri P.Surya Rao, , Principal, B.T.I. Bilaspur,R/o. Mopka Road, BUaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^Z^Y^ &<*.ss-" ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The'- Secretary, DepEirtment of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya., Raipur (C.G.) 2. Distnct Education Officer, Bilaspiir, Distt., Bilaspur (C.G.) ^-3. Director of School Education (D.P.I.),Raipur (G.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -HC-22 antff^n K;-f arg^l ^w^ •af^a ^. ^g ^iMidi), ^-dly'lii. hcii'yy 37I^?T "CfaT^ 1)1*<CTI ShWtl <SK^?1 M^c( ._.....ki:.&...fe,_)..l^-'?oc?7 ^ ^.............»...........^........^ ^ fa<i<isr' 3ii^r?'rarwato SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRdTINKBR DIWAKER +l'4ld41Tl 'TfPRTf ^ 'felst' <p3|^l< i; aipOT SII^CT 06.12.2010 Shri Rahul Birtharey, coun^el for fhe petitioner. Shri Praveea Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. Counsel appearing for thej petitioner subxnits that'fhe petitioner is working as Lectur^r under the Joint director, PubUc Education, Raipur Divis^on. The petitioner obtained B.Ed. examination certi&cate ia t3)ic year 1984 fix>xa Paudit Ravi ShatLkar Shulda Universily, Raipi|.r on her own expenses. Coiinsel for the petitione^ submits that fhe question iuvolved hereia as to whether th< examination certi&eate on his/h^r own expenses is entitled to two advance uicremeuts. Accordiag to the counsel foj is entrded to two advauce uicreiy teacher, who obtauied B.Ed. the petitioner, the petitioner •nts in view of fbe decision of this Court in the case of Yaslt.want Kumar BhardwaJ Vs. Munlcipal Corporatioa, Dnrg a^td aaother reported ia 2006 (II| MPJR 96 (CG). This Court is^ the case of Yasbwant kumar Bharadwaj (Supra) caine to fhe |conclusion fhat the teachers who bad obtaiaed B.Ed/B.T.I expenses are covered by fhe circ^ fhe State of Madhya Pradesh. Counsel for the petitioner fiu-tliier subinits fhat the facts and question of law involyed iu covered by decision pf this Co Examioation on fheir own ilar dated 24.12.98 issued by |lie present case are squarely u-t in. fhe case of Yashwaat 4i< kumar Bharadwaj (Supra) to wt(ich counsel appearmg for fhe i~^ '^T^ [-HC-22 ft ''saaaa s '^AsS^ i~5:'<' ^g •.qpn^pi, •s^tws. r««'iwi< 31T^T IRW *lll<tl thHl* '^ 200 I^^T' StI^I^I h'u* s^y SftHi^ ^lf?tf sn^i'gsiiwHfe respondents fairly concedes aad by the counsel appearing for fhc Accordingly, the petidon isj passed ia fhe case of Yashwajit subject to verification of the fac| bas acquired B.Ed Examuiation as per fhe circulars dated 24) whether she has been paid two order as to costs. 'iiliirt'il-f w^vS ti^S <Rii*4i< ^SlPOTSII^t ^grees with fhe averment inade tietitioner. allowed ui tenns of fhe order Kiunar Bharadwaj (Supra) as to whether fhe petitioner (fertificate on her own expenses 112.98 & 1.3.99 aud farther Advauce iricreiaents or not. No Sd/- /: pritinkerDiwakar Judge f^^w