IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 2792 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 12.09.2011 Gautam Kumar ....Petitioner Vs. Sheela Bhowmick ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate, for Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Neither the petitioner nor his counsel has turned up to argue the case. Even on the last four dates, he did not appear in the Court. The petition appears to have been filed just to prolong the litigation. Even otherwise, having perused the impugned order, the same appears to be well reasoned and well founded. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 12.09.2011 JUDGE ajp