t^Sl „<—" wi-li' HlGH GOUWT OF GHHMTBaMRH AT HLASPUR Wfrit PeUUonlG) No3»860oSSatl » s 'P^tttiorter M/s.RungtaRiceMll(,AI;^i^eretf Plalntiff Partn»^ilp^Firm, ThrQugh: Pertn^r, Amit Run^a ^o ftemaBrtar Rungte, agal about 35i^are, 6 RS'rtOdt'gK Maig,Rajnandgaon(C.<3.) »"•?'*' Respondents Defendant Versus M/s. Runs^aPohaMitl, APartnarsh^) Rnn.Threygh: It'sRaitna's ; ShaileiKlra Ru^gta, agpd abotrt;4S- years, SA? Late Madain Lal Run^; ^•:;sg :::.^' 2 SmtRekha Rungta, Wfo ShatflCTwlra Rungta, ^al aboyt 44 yeare, wa Both Partn(?rs,Run9taP<^aMillyiR/® Near State Bank of' B^ Bi^nic*, S^ ^santhl ; tjne, F^an^on(G.Gj y " (V^P^itKOTil^ 1- ••.•• •. " '1: MrAnoop Maziir^aTt cc^i^^ttw petttioner^ » Nonepresent forlthe respondents, dtheigh not no(k». (SB: ^Hoifbte Mr. T.P.SUanna,: J.) •^•^••^^^••--.••.^ ORDERfORALt (1i6-8-2011) 1. By thls writ petttlpn under Artiete ^7oftte GonsUtiAtW ^^ petitjoner has cbaNer^ed the t^ality & propri^ty <rf the oroter^dMed 30.42011 <Ann®(ureFyi) p^sed by the TWrd.^il Judge CNes-11, Rajnandgaon In Chril SuU No.4®-A/2EX®,wheretQF learned Thiird Glvll JvKSge Class-11 has dismissed the applteatiDn for taking <ta?unr»enl namely, copy of i^Wratton (srtlflGate of the petttioner on recORl ^u^lecf '*of(»ymentof flne |of RS.20(y-. 2. 1 have heard teamed coynset for the pigttttoner, perusect the dRte I .,.- ; .'..'.:-. .:'.. '..::.•...':.' ~^!^l''';'':i :'l-i:'"'i-: :. ImpugriedandotherclocymentsfltedQnbehaWqtthep^Biot'W, 11 3. Incasp ofsuttlitel on beMalfofrflgte^wlpartnershlpflfflEi^c^rWisateloft reglstration Is we^ssary docufflentto^tablishtheflntlttsmehfitelaiRt. • f ^- 4. Definitely, the petitioner has not flled such documerd at the time offiling of suit, but considering the fact that samewas publle document, total denial from fiiing such document is not just. • 5. Considering the fact, observanee of procadural !aw would only be futite exercise. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. Orcter impugned cteted 30.4.2011 (Annexure P/1) is hereby quashal. ApFdcalion flled on behalf of the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the C.P.C. is aliowed, subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/-16 opposite party btfore the trial Court, withln 15 days from today. No order as to cests. » Sd/- T.p. Sharma