1 APPLN 5433.10.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5433 OF 2010 Mr. Vinesh Karunakar Shetty. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Ms. Rohini Dandekar for the Applicant. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 06th SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the Accused – Applicant. 2. Perused the report of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 37th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai dated 10th June 2011. Learned Counsel submits that the hearing of C.C. No. 204/PW/2009 be expedited. 3. The report demonstrate, after recording evidence of complainant, the Advocate for the Accused did not turn and consequently, the cross-examination is postponed on number of occasions. Thereafter, the complainant did not turn. The Accused - Applicant Vinesh is directed to be released on Personal Recognition Bond in terms of Section 436-A of Cr.P.C. by order dated 31.07.2010. The other facet of the matter is in 2 APPLN 5433.10.sxw C.C. No.878/PW/2008, the charge was framed on 18th March 2009. The Complainant was examined as PW-1. In the said case also, the Accused - Applicant is directed to be released on Personal Recognition Bond in terms of Section 436-A of Cr.P.C. C.C.No.878/PW/2008 is pending for recording evidence of prosecution witnesses, it was lastly pending on 14.6.2011. 4. Considering above facts, request of the Accused - Applicant for expeditious hearing of the above referred two cases, need not be so directed to the learned Judge, who has to take up other custody matters. The Application dismissed. Communicate if the Accused is still in jail. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)