In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1972 of 2008 Date of decision: August 17, 2009 Satwant Kaur Sapra wife of Sutinder Singh Sapra ..Petitioner Versus Shiv Dev Singh Kang and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jatin Salwan, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. ,,, Rakesh Kumar Garg, J(Oral) It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that respondent No.1 could not be present in Court as he has suffered multiple injuries. However, he has assured the court that as and when he is called, he will be present in court. Explanation on behalf of respondent No.1 is accepted. Presence of respondent No.1 is exempted for today. Reply on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed in court and the same is taken on the record. In the reply, the respondents have undertaken to release the benefit of the petitioner within one month from today. In view of the aforesaid undertaking given by the respondents, I am not inclined to proceed further with the contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the respondents shall be bound by their undertaking given in this Court that the benefits of the petitioner shall be released within one month from today. If need be, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of this contempt petition. August 17, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE