'^•^.m^ ^^ ^ ^3 -7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONfS) N0. QX)}'\/2011. PETITIONERS: f. -^' ..•""'^w ..^"'^^' ..v'<r ^yi-"""" '^^"" 1. Radheshyam Kharsan, son of Late B.R.Kharsan, aged about 50 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Chakamar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. ^ 2. Budhram Ghritlahare, son ofLate Paltooram Ghritlahar, aged about 48 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Janibahar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. .^ Respondents versus 1. 2. ^" 3. 4: ^ 5. 6. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department ofTribal Welfare and Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Commissioner, Aadivasi Vikas, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector, Aadim Jati Kalyan Branch, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. Block Education Officer, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. Kirtan Lal Bharadwaj, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle :^ ^ School, Sitamadi, Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA *11*1CTI »*11<t» '3^[ ^i<4i<n^, ^xit<-)<i(o, T®!<vii-Mt|.< , W.?.(^^-3l3M^I 9 W^200 ^n^'SFT'f^W WT ^T^T st»^i<t» -y ^ ^i^f ^^ (<i?('Sq<i^) 'FRHW^tef 3TT^[ SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. 20-06-2011 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, counsel| Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawt "5 on advance copy. Heard. This petition has been filed |3y the petitioner chaitenging order GnNf<v<4hT ^H<riT'? (el<i <Fst^i< i7^fipT3?i^r for the petitioner. ^er forthe State/respondents No.1 to dated 22-01-2007(Annexure P-2), v respondent No.6 was promoted as LJ time, the petitioner was aiso promote^ petitioner seeks to ohaltenge the intd^ se seniority on the submission that the promotion of respondent No.6 irj illegal. He further submits that in th^ been shown to be appointed on the p| 09-1998 whereas he was promoted a| 01-2007. i find that the petitioner h^ authorities vide his representatjon which has not been decided so far tt] matter. 1 am not inclined to entertain tt1 sought to ohalienge the promotion (^ three years, particularly when th^ promotion till he got promotion in the| 'show that immediately thereafter, ^hereby junior of the petitioner i.e. ipper Division Teacher. In course of on 02-07-2008(Annexure P-3). The supercession of the petitipner vvas gradation list, respondent No.6 has 3st of Upper Division Teacher on 11- Upper Divisjon Teacher only on 22- is preferred representation to the dated 04-02-2011 (Annexure P-8), is for the department to consider the is petition because the petitioner has f respondent No.6, after more than petitioner did not chailenge the year 2008. There is no dooument to :he petitioner made representation oiaiming seniority over and above res^ondent No.6. E r, ^Rt^Tra—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. u XI-HG—78 4 •3^'<|i|<.l|^1^,y>^i^jS,{QJ^|^^ *WqtlTS^I^ 'W1.200 371$^T ^jgg? (^ii^^l?) ^^m ]RN '^'SiJ^SPiJ^ .\ Tumane '^i^T^fiI^t^ —1. Be that as it may, the pending before the respondent authj) With the aforesaid observatiop pettt|oner may pursue his representation '^I^felfi3?V^S ^f^^ ifii^^i 17^3?! srity. n, the petition is finaily disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge