IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2010 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RSA.No. 840 of 2010() --------------------- AS.159/2006 of DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,TRIVANDRUM OS.432/1998 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: --------------------------------------- KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,(SIDCO)SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: --------------- T.SANTHAKUMARY, AGED 56 YEARS, D/O.THANKAMMA, RESIDING AT MADHAVA VILASOM, THUNDATHIL, KAZHAKKUTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. FOR R SRI.G.P.SHINOD FOR R THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- R.S.A.NO.840 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T It is submitted by the counsel on both sides that the parties have settled the disputes out of court. The learned counsel for the appellant also submitted that a memo has been filed that the appeal be dismissed as not pressed, in view of the settlement. Since the appeal is dismissed as not pressed, and a settlement effected by the parties, the appellant is entitled to refund of one half of the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal under Section 69 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 as held in Philomina Joseph v. State of Kerala (2009 (1) KLT 591). Appeal is dismissed directing refund of one half of the court fee to the appellant, permitting its counsel to collect the refund certificate in accordance with the rules. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp RSA.840/2010 2