1 ABA 299-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.299 OF 2011 Sandeep Ranaji Jadhav ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.P.M.Pradhan i/b. Mr.Sanjay S. Patil, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 20TH APRIL, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who has been named in the FIR as having caused injuries to the first informant by sickle and stick. The Injury Certificate shows that the victim had contused lacerated wound over left fore arm which was bone deep on the left pinna of ear which was clean cut & one behind ear skin 2 ABA 299-2011 deep. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the injuries could not have been caused by sickle, since it is sharp edged weapon, & therefore, the injuries could be incised wounds and not contused lacerated wound. This would have to be decided only after seeing the sickle which was used. There is no case for grant of anticipatory bail. 3. Anticipatory Bail Application is rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)