SK&S 39 c'.cT^--"' \ IJN BJE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. OF2005 ^ '^ 4 a; p.ii;rrrnoNERs ^^i^ v-^ ^^w ^y ^••-"" KESrONDENTS .sj(t^N€" i ^ 4 ^ ^^^ /^l. Rameshwar Prasad Patel, S/o Parmanand Patel, aged about 57 years, ^2. Lalan Prasad Patel, S/o Gajranjan Singh, aged about 44 years, Both residents of Village Saposh Tehsil- Dabhra, Distt- Janjgir-Champa (CG) Versus ,/ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Water Resources, D.K.S. Building, Mantralay, Raipur Distt- Raipur ^ 2. Collector, Janjgir-Champa, District - Janjgir-Champa (CG) , 3. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Champa, Distt- Janjgir-Champa, .,4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) (Land Acquisition Officer) Dabhra, District - Janjgir- Champa, (CG) ^.^ k^s^.^^ ..^^^^^.....^^^ .^^^^ [V y^>•' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^° ^ ^ XI-HC-78 ^P CTfl»»TT^ \d-DqrqiqiC)«^tPTn<<1<l<S;RoW^( _._ ^.' 3n^$TcpTR^li<p WIT3n^$Td?*li<b :r '^ 1.1 ,J- . sn^^qsi^ ^ciijcicEi) ^200 ^ g^IT^R^lRd 3TT^T 14-9-2005 •• -: s Mr. H.S. Patel, counsei f4 AA,r. Parag Kotecha, Pane! Heard both the counsel. The main grievance of th dated 31-12-2004 'passed b.y respondent No3 is^not deposi^ the Land Acquisjtion Officer's i| P-4). The Lana! Acquisition Of| .year' 2004 and the sarne was p.4 24-2-2004. Learned counsel for th| question was taken^for constru| is unfortunate that respondent| year i973,'and in the first in| passed, the petitjoner was forc^d writ petition and the .order daj after about 11 years;and the 4 tlie compensation .mo.ney is not cpi^FcxilTi+ii+ioT^f^^xl^i^ix ^3ri^T3II^?T ? 'the petitjoners. ».awyerfor the State/r%spondents s petitioners is that in spite of the award the Land Acquisition-: Officer, Dabhra, ing the cornpensation money in terrns.'of nemorandum dated 25-7-2005 (Annexure :icer the award a^ back as jn the after the 'directiori'of this Court .on s petitioners submits; that the !and in :tion of water tank in the year 1973. It No.3 utiiized the petitioners' land in the rfance, the compensati'on award vvas not sd to approach this Court by way of filing red 24-2-2004 was passed by this Court ^vard was passed in December, 2004, stil! >eing paid. XI-HC-78 vd^q ^q |«lc5<<y tPTllwKS, Rtoi'<1^< ..^..•y.:^s.^/..... @ TpRyr ^m^•———— •••T-•^—•'^— ^y^200^ 3TT^5Tq^p (ijcli^dcE;) an'^^TpRTf^iN? ?T8TT3TI^$Tfh^ii<b ^r Soma ^ ^ c< In the circumstunces, compensation money.as per the periorf'of bne'-rrionthlfrom today.i Learned, counse! for the •petltionepr'has moved an appli| Acquisjtion 'Acr, for ^making refe Therefore, respondents h appilcation, within a:'period Qf o^ law. . With the directions aforj of. In view of this order, AA.d disposed of. Parties are •entitled for c4 re^Dondent <Pl<<[c5<Tln HPTOt'^'feT^t' ^R^R ^3Tf^T31T^T No.3 is directed to deposit the l|.and Acquisition Officer'saward within a petitioners further submits that the bation under Section ; 18 of the Land 1'ence and that is not being .decided. lo.2 A 4 ai-ne directed to .decide the said |e month from today, in accordance with ^said^.the wrlt petition'stands '{V.)P.No.3543/2005 <& I.A.No.7890/2005 rtified copy of this order^ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge