IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-32722 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 19, 2011 Saranjit Kaur & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing FIR No.256 dated 11.6.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC alongwith all consequent proceedings, in view of the fact that all the disputes between the parties have been settled by way of compromise dated 23.10.2010, placed on record as Annexure P-2. 2. Vide order dated 15.12.2010, the Trial Court was directed to take statements of the parties so as to verify the Crl. Misc. No. M-32722 of 2010 [2] genuineness of compromise (Annexure P-2). 3. Report dated 18.12.2010 furnished by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, has been received, according to which, all the disputes between the parties have been settled by way of compromise. Compromise has been effected without any pressure or inducement. 4. Considering the nature of offence and the fact that all the disputes have been settled by the parties by way of compromise, continuance of proceedings shall not be fruitful and shall not be in the interest of peace and harmony. 5. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.256 dated 11.6.2010 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC alongwith all consequent proceedings, is hereby quashed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 19, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?