1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1248/2010 (Shailesh Dinkar Ramteke (Shailesh Dinkar Rama) VERSUS Manisha Shailesh Ramteke (Manisha Baldeo Waghe)) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Wagh, counsel for the appellant. Shri A.A. Kathane, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : JULY 1 , 2011 . Heard. The learned counsel for the parties have presented a compromise pursis in the Court, today. The same is accepted on record and marked as Exhibit ‘Z’. The compromise pursis/consent terms of settlement between the parties are signed by the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent. The compromise terms have also been signed by the appellant and the respondent. The appellant and the respondent are personally present in the Court, today. On a query to the appellant and the respondent in regard to the terms of settlement, they have answered that they are ad-idem on the terms and conditions mentioned in clauses ‘A’ to ‘G’ of the consent terms. We have perused the consent terms at ‘A’ to ‘G’. They are extremely just and reasonable. Hence, it is necessary to dispose of the first appeal in view of the consent terms of the settlement between the parties. 2 The first appeal is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the settlement. A decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE