‘ wwm i WWW WW WTW§R *aimm “v, €E.M.P. “€Gv41512008 FETETEGENRS 1. Shj‘am La}, $011 of Ludhram (Confcted {in Jail} an Jail) n c is Jodhan Lal Sari) R/o. Vmagc A wn‘, Post Smghlipur, Tahsil KEshkal, t. BaStar KEG} 2. Saj tram Son of Kanglu Ram, VillagE‘. (OHM!) Kr ari Post Badskholi, TahSil Kashkal, Di Lt Bastar (CG) Versus RE$PG§§DENT St t6 of C1111attisgarh, through Poh'ce Sta i011 and Tahsil Kankcr. District Nm‘th Ba tar, Kallkm‘ (CG) Agglicatian under Secticn 4-82 o§ e CL? £ fa; mmhi‘icatmn of the erdef data! 6,8.2G08 gamed by ihis Haif'ble Court in M.Cr.C. M0.864£20C‘8 $3 EiQftE’BLE $EIRI DHIRENIBRA MESHRA J. {313%}.2668 Sm Vishmu Kgshta, counsd fer tlm pétitionars. Shri U.K.S. Chaudal Panel La‘wyér for the Staté. Heal‘ii. ThE apph'cgm‘is have pr€§5rr€d this apgalication "Linda Sectmn 482 \ of 111E CLPVC. for modificaiiali of the order datsd 6.8.2008 pas3€d £11 f M‘C1*.C. N9864/‘08, whereby father’s name of thE applicant No.1- Shyam Lal, haS bétén wrong 7 montionod as ‘Ludhram’ 1'11 plaoo of ‘Jodhaii L81 Sod’. Lealnoci counsoi for tho. 1361i?ionors oubmits That abovo error Crop‘r—irr r11 rho ordor baca’uso he a13131ioant has montioned his; fathor’s name ae ‘Ludhram’ 1'11 the ap )licarion filed uoder Section 439 of the Mmfaian' 3911mm WW m‘zoo 31mm (Wu) mmm ?2f _.WWM WW §Nifawan€¥l CrPCw whahaas; in 1:116 charge father’s mama of the applicaiit applicant haS al$o fi‘md phat Whérdn, the fathér’s nama of Jodhain Lal Sori. The above fact i5 not divs}; uted by leaned counsel for the State. In that VIEW of ths 111a directéd that i11 m6 01‘6161‘ No.864/2068, name of t11€ ap Sfo Ludhram’, b€ Hiati as ‘Shy SégA Wm sheEt as W611 as FIR and Dahati Ndishi, is menfioned aS Jorlhan Lal' SOII The ocopy of the first information mport, the applicani has b€e11 mentioned as :ter, the petition iS allowerl and it i3 dated 6.8.2008 passed in NLCLC. plicant No.1 mentioned as ‘Sllyam Lal /// im Lai, Sf 0 Jodhan Lal Sorl’. Petition is accordingly dis posed of. Celiined copy as per 11116 . i JuGge D wtmwcww