IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.369 of 2010 1. MATHURA RAM S/O LATE NAGINA RAM R/O VILL.- GHARWASDIH, P.S.- KACHHAWAN, DISTT.- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SRI AJAY MUKHERJEE, CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPTT. OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. K.K. SINHA, THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. ANIL KUMAR, DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION CUM JOINT SECRETARY DEPTT. OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. MR.SUDHIR KUMAR, COMMISSIONER PURNEA DIVISION PURNEA 6. MR. SHRIDHAR, C, DISTT. MAGISTRATE PURNEA ----------- 3/ 05/01/2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly acknowledges that the order on the writ petition was complied with when the suspension was revoked, but makes a grievance that salary for the period of suspension has only partly been paid. There was no such direction in the writ petition while setting aside the suspension order. Departmental proceedings were directed to continue. In what manner the period of suspension shall be treated has to be decided in the final order in the departmental proceedings. There is no occasion to proceed in the contempt jurisdiction. The contempt application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)