S'^^^&^1^^^^^^^?^^^'^^^^!'1^'^^ ^j^^^^^^J^g^J^gj^^^^^^^^l^ t Divlsion BeN* <L-PlM INTHEJ-UGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT APPEAL ) ^S 12007 aitffl |E3i;B APPELLANT p&-riTioNe-(L I.V. Shrivastava, Age about 53 years, S/o Shri Khemlal Shrivastava, Ex-Junior Superintendent p.y..^0-- p(8SSfttf! ...--. ^TM.P. StateWarehousing Corporation, 'i\ o^..i~-"y"""i^'^ SS-l"'""/<lAS<!;Jft"""" Reaional Office, Raipur, Distt. leW^nS.^--"" l°'"'......'^-'^ -••--••<""(1^7^ RESPQNDENTS f.c-^poMD^n^ Regional Office, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. M.P.StateWarehousing Corporation Through :The Managing Director, Office Complex, Block A, Gautam Nagar, Bhopal (M.P.) 2. Regional Manager, M.P. State Warehousing Corporation, Mahasamund Road, 97, Anand Nagar Raipur(C.G.) Chhattisgarh StateWarehousing Corporation Throug -The Managing Director, Anand Nagar, Mahasamund Road, Raipur (C.G.) ^^t.^^flff'-^ u.J«»-S^wjtc.O o{ ^<-.._<H^ &"<+ O^C-C; ^^- 2-a°6 ^ ^'<MV- w24_C'F. h!:Th-c*4ni.^b .lA-'?'1^"'- IL uu%P|SEAt^UltoER-Ryi.£-+^tet©F-eHHATTlSGARl+tit€rl+- L. eounT nui-ES-2oo&- €^^^ Against (a) Orderdated :20.07.2006 (b) InW.P.No.: 241/2002 (c) PassedbyHon'bleHighCourtof Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur(C.G.) Enclosed as AnnexureW.A. 1 \&^r ^} ei®e|^ti1— lc'au'yA.ej'v^ ^ v^: ••</ ^ ,«'l;i'-,^ HIGHCdURT QF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W. A,_No. 178 of 2007 AppeUaat I. V. Shrivastava Versus Respondents M. P. State Warehousiiig Corporation others WRITAPPEAL UNDER SECTON 2(1) OFTHE CHHAmSGARH HIGH COURT (APPEALTO DIVISION BENCH1 ACT.2006 DB: Hon'ble Mr. I. M. Quddusi, & Hon'ble Mr. R. L. Jhanwar, JJ. Shri Ajay Shiivastava, Advocate for the appeBant. Shri SaifKhan, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 & 2. Shri Shashaak Thakur, Advocate for fhe respondent No. 3. OR D E R (orall ( Passed on fhis 1st day ofApril, 2010 ) 1. Heard leamed couiisel appearing for the writ appellant as weU as learaed couasel appeariug for the respondents. 2. This writ appeal has beeii filed agaiast fhe unpugned judgment aad order dated 20th July, 2006, passed by fhe leamed Siagle Judge iu W.P. No. 241/2002 ( I. V. Shrivastava Vs. M. P. State Warehousiug Corporation aad oue aaother), dismissiag the writ petition, upholding the inipugned order dated 28.2.2001, passed by the Maiiagiag Director, Madhya Pradesb Warehousiag Corporation, -" retiring fhe petitioner, who was Juiuor Superiatendent at Raipur, compulsorily, on attaining the age of 50 years aad completing 20 years of seryice, in pubUc iateresl, wifh payment of three monftis salary and aUowaaces. 3. The writ petition was filed after dismissal of fhe departmental appeal preferred agauist the order of corapulsory retireiuent. )--" i)' V,. ^ 1 // ' ^•Wtent -.i^- ^% 4. Needless to mention here fhat the appeUant's service record was not up to niark and fhe Screening Contmittee considered tfae case of other persons, mcluding the appeUant and reported fhat his service record was not found satisfactoiy. He got adverse entries aud punishinents. During his service, besides adverse entries, he was given puaishiaents by stopping of two iucreinents wifhout cumulative effect on 26th April, 1997 and thereafler again two increinents wifhout curaulative effect on 21st October, 1998 ete. 5. Learaed Single Judge has considered fhe matter elaborately and arrived at the opinion that the writ petition was liable to be disniissed. 6. We do not find aay iUegality or impropriety ia the impugned order. The writ appeal is iniscouceived aad fhe same is disitussed. Sd/- I.M. Quddusi Judge Sd/- R.L. Jbanwar Judge ;:. 'rt.cL'