1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.131/2008 (Ghanshyam & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 07, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.D.S.Udawat, for the petitioners. Mr.Narendra Moolchandani, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that deceased Arjun Singh himself stated in his statement that he was given beatings by co-accused Pintu Merat and Prem Singh Merat. He also stated that Kanhailal Das was also assaulted by Pintu, Prem Singh Merat and Manik Bangali by lathies. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, so far as present petitioners are concerned, no overt act has been assigned to them either by deceased Arjun Singh or by the witnesses. Even the witnesses also stated that deceased Arjun Singh was assaulted by Lathi on his legs etc. by Pintu and Prem Singh. However, they are not before this Court. 2 Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no allegation of causing injury to the deceased by the present petitioners, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Ghanshyam s/o Kalu and Paras s/o Panna be released on bail in FIR No.148/2007, P.S. Anandpur Kalu, Distt. Pali provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-