WP(C) 2382/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The petitioner is the wife of Late Satya Boro, who was working u nder the respondents as Muster Roll Worker, whose service was subsequently regul arized on 22.7.2005. According to the petitioner, she is entitled to family pens ion in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 20.5.2009. The petitioner has annexe d copies of the correspondences made in this regard. However, the respondents ha ving not done anything in the matter and the petitioner having not been communic ated with any final decision in the matter, she has approached this Court by fil ing the instant writ petition. Mr. R.C. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner while emphas izing the need for early settlement of the case of the petitioner, Dr. B. Ahmed, learned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department submits that if upon examining the case of the petitioner, it is found that she is entitled for family pension, necessary follow up action be taken place. Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Co unsel appearing for the Director of Pension also submits that the matter is requ ired to be looked into by the Department of Pension in consultation with the rsp odnent No. 4 i.e. the Accountant General, Assam. Mr. R. Sarma, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appea ring on behalf of the respondent No. 4 submits that if the papers are received b y the office of the Accountant General, then it will be proceed as expeditiously as possible. Considering the matter in its entirety, I dispose of the writ pe tition with a direction to the respondents to finalize the pension case of the p etitioner as expeditiously as possible, but at any rate, not later than 31.12.20 10. Writ petition is disposed of.