IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI WRIT PETITION NO : 22724 of 1994 Between: 1 Islavat Kishan, s/o Isshra, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 2 Islavat Neerja, S/o Ishra, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 3 Amgoth Redya, S/o Heera, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 4 Guguloth Chandya, S/o Gangya, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 5 Rathla Lachya, S/o Papya, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 6 Rathla Motya, S/o Papya, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 7 Badavat Itya, s/o Ramsingh, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 8 Rathla Kevdya, s/o Lalsingh, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 9 Rathla Ramya, S/o Papya, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 10 Madoth Lalsingh, s/o Umla, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 11 Lanka Prasad, S/o ramdas, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. 12 Shivaji, s/o Kotaiah, R/o Sangaiguda Tanda, Hamlet of Chityal (M), Medak Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer Medak, Medak Dist. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kolcharan (M) Medak Dist. 3 Divisional Forest Officer, Medak. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioners herein from the Survey.No.255/1 situated at Kongodi (V), Kulcharan (M), Medak Dist and further restrain the respondets from granting pattas of the said land in favour of other person or persons and declare the same as illegal arbitrary and voilative of Articles 14 & 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.VINOD KUMAR DESHPANDE (not present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (not present) The Court made the following : ORDER: Nobody appeared when the case is called. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ____________ (Bilal Nazki,J) vs/ys To 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer Medak, Medak Dist. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kolcharan (M) Medak Dist. 3 Divisional Forest Officer, Medak. 4 Two CCs to the G.P for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(O.U.T). 5 Two CD copies.