IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.23 of 2008 RAMESH KUMAR …..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUJEET PRASAD ..Opposite Parties ----------- 3. 12.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order dated 29.11.2007 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 73 of 2007 by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-3, Muzaffarpur. It appears from the record that the petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Section 302 along with other sections of I.P.C.. Juvenile Justice Board vide order dated 28.6.2007 declared the petitioner as a juvenile aged about 13 and a half years. However, learned Fast Track Court No. III, Muzaffarpur vide impugned order set aside the order of Juvenile Justice Board and remanded the matter to be decided afresh after obtaining report from the medical board with regard to age of the petitioner. On perusal of impugned order as well as the photo copy of admit card (annexure-2), I am of the view that there is no illegality and impropriety in the impugned order. The court below has rightly directed the Juvenile Justice Board for examination of the age of the petitioner by medical board. At this - 2 - stage, it would not be proper to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is rejected. However, Juvenile Justice Board is directed to dispose of the matter within two months from the date of receipt of this order after obtaining report from the medical board. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)