IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH ./*•.•. . . • - <t-^' •^.~.7> M.C.C. N0. 6So OF 2011 w^, ^ Applicant/ Appellant Non-Claimant .^•^S&y^ yv ?<®' .^<^^ ^^"^y^- rahs ^>:y-^^' (CGI- y^^<^ \^ 1. Kalap Ram Patel, aged about 51 years, S/o Khagpati Prasad Patel, resident of village Chhibra, Police Station Pithora, Tahsil & District Mahasamund .^' Non-Applicants/ Respondents/ Claimants 2. Versus Srat. Amrika Bai alias Hira Bai, aged about 37 years, widow of Late Bhagvandin Ganda. Ku. Jyoti, aged about 14 years, daughter of Late Bhagvandin Ganda. Yugandhar, aged about 12 years, son of Late Bhagvandin Ganda. %v. '^^ w 7. Komal, aged about 10 years, son ofLate Bhagvandin Ganda. Respondents No.2 to 4 are represented by their mother Smt. Amrika Bai alias Hira Bai Prem Singh, aged about 82 years, S/o Ram Singh Ganda Smt Mehatarin Bai, aged about 77 'years, wife of Prem Singh Ganda. f'" Tikaram, aged about 42 years, S/o Dhaniram Patel, by caste Aghariya. All residents of village Chhibra, Police Station Pithora, Tahsil 8s District Mahasamund (CG). APPUCATION^OR RESTORATION OF MISC. APPEAL N0.320 OF 2004 -S=ss ^pn^TC?, 's^RPTO, ^iRTy .,.M,.C.^.Mi?..-,^.5.?/ 3[I^fq5T^;!R7 ^^ iTR TRTWai^'•B'^I ^'ifeifri •WTO1 'i'i I^Zt '?m(5TT ^ sifg-q s!^ n' MraM'B! 1«0; •B: nur< oi-i iVIRJUSTSCI >llt^i ^.K. AGARWAL 26.08.2011: Shri B.D. Guru, counse! f Heardonl.A.No.1/2011 of de!ay in fliing the M.C.C.. On du'c consideration, succeeded in expiaining the c therefore, the application (I.A. the M.C.C. Is condoned. Also heard on restoratio? The petitioner is seeking which is an application for condonatlon 1 am satisfied that the petitioner is ^use of deiay in filing the M.C.C. and, No.1/2011} is allowed. Dciay in filing On due considerationof ser .A. ffde grounds. a^ /^ r^ i.s^.O. No. 650/2011 M/^ ^Qn/^rtrt^ <". *—./t.*^-^-j+^. 's+^. i*iO-.3Zu/Zuu4 is resTorea ro ns qnginai numDer. A copy of this order be jj the same bc iisted for hearli'y Certified copy, as per rui^s. br the petitioner. application. restoration of M.A. No.320/2004 whici- v»-asdlsmissed for v»antof prosfecufion vide order dated 1 0.9.2010. he SLibmissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the groi|nds taken in the restoration petition, 1 am satisfied thatthe absence 4'ihs petitioner's counsel on 10.9.2010 No.320/2004 was t^ken-up for hearing »vasbased onbona therefore, Is ailowed and ?v' yl/l«!«^/»It^IIBVll^rf^ .A. |aced on record of the origina! fiic and fter tvv'o "vveeks. Sd/- N.K-Agarwal Judge