\ OV 1 IHHIHWHIIWIHIHWill“ CF0000159773 ‘ ‘ @ 5E ~ C5mvi¢€ W&*Li> Noi” Fixed @ AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO. 3428/2005 PETITIONERS: Narendra Singh Kachhawaha Son of Mr. M.S. Kachhawaha aged about 43 years, Librarian, A.C.P. Public School, Gopal Nagar, Resident of Quarter No. E—248, Gopal Nagar District Janjgir Champa [C.G.] Faleshwar Dhar Deewan Son of Mr. P.D. Deewan aged about 4O years T.G.T.A.C.P. Public School, Gopalnagar Resident of Quarter No. E—67, Gopal Nagar District Janjgir— Champa [C.G.] VERSUS State of C.G. Through its Director of Public Instruction Lok Shikshan Sanchanalaya C.G. Raipur {C.G.} Gopal Nagar Education Society Through The Management Commettee A.C.P. Public School, - Gopal Nagar, District Janjgir Champa [C.G.] Mr. S.K. Pandey, EX—Officer, Gopal Nagar Education, Society A.CLP. Public School Gopal Nagar, District Janjgir Champa [C.G.] RESPONDENTS: ~ u ‘wmm ~, 4. A.C.P. Public School Through its Principal ATCP. Public School, Gopal Nagar, District Janjgir Champa [C.G.] Board of Secondary Through Secretary 5. Central Education Shiksha kendra, 2, Community Centre Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092 Kt» Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the constitution of India ~for the issuance of the Writ/ Writes in the nature of mandamus/ and /or certiorari/ and/ or prohibition/ and/or : other appropriate direction / directions/ and or order/ orders. 5M 31W m wwwvaqwfm zoo m mmmm ‘ 1 WW W %mm mix S.B.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PFilTlNKER DIWAKER 02—12-2010: Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for the State/respondent No.1 Shri N. K. Vyas, counsel f0! respondent Nos. 2 to 4. The petitioners who were 2 & 4 on the post of Librarian an Trained Graduate Teacher order dated 01.07.2005 (Annexure P-1) by which their seri ices came to be terminated. It has been informed by th counsel for the parties that termination order dated 01.07.200 has already been assailed by the petitioners before respo dent No.1 i.e. Director of Public Instructions by way of ap eal on 08.07.2005 and the said appeal is still pending before Counsel for the petitioners submits that in the appeal l preferred by the petitioners. an i terim order was passed in favour of the petitioners on 20.07. 005 vide Annexure P—3 but till date the same has not be n complied with by the respondents. It is further su mitted on behalf of the petitioners that on 12.08.2005 t‘ey have tiled appropriate . 5 application before the appellate a thority for execution of the rking with respondent Nos. (Mathematics) have assailed th [Itm ff: v. i . order dated 20.07.2005 but no action has been taken by the appellate authority. Counsel for all the parties can be issued to the appeHate appeal of the petitioners which is Public instructions i.e. respondei stipulated time. Considering the submissiOI for the parties and looking to the the case particularly the fact that 08.07.2005 and that the petitioner appellate authority i.e. the Dir fairly submit that a direction authority for deciding the pending before the Director, 1t No.1 herein, within some ts as made by the counsel facts and circumstances of the appeal is pending since ; are out ofemployment, the tor, Public Instructions is directed to decide the appeal of etitioners pending before it within three months from the da order. The petitioners and the incipal of respondent No. i.e. A.C.P. Public School are dir cted to appear before the Director on 20‘“ December, 2010. Needles to say that the peti ioners and the respondents herein would co—operate the ap ellate authority so as t ensure the disposal of the appeal unnecessary adjournment. This C of receipt of copy of this 4 o y it and shall not seek any urt has not entered into the l {The}