IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2009 / 26TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 31667 of 2008(T) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- B.SUSEELA, NEELAKANTA VILASAM, CHERALATTU KARA, THRIAKKARIYOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. THE THAHASILDAR, KOTHAMANGALAM. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKARIYOOR VILLAGE OFFICE. KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK. 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KOTHAMANGALAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.K.PUSHPALATHA FOR R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31667/2008 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT DEED DTD. 21/03/2006 BEARING NO.1841/2006 OF KOTHAMANGALAM SRO. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 21/03/2006 UNDER FORM 1 APPENDED TO TRANSFER OF REGISTRY RULES. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 24/10/08 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE: ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 15/09/2008 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31667 of 2008 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent to dispose of Exhibit P2 application in accordance with the provisions of Transfer of Registry Rules. Exhibit P2 is an application made by the petitioner seeking mutation of his property. According to the petitioner, Exhibit P2 was made to the 4th respondent. Subsequently, the petitioner also approached second respondent by filing Exhibit P3. Complaint in this writ petition is that orders have not been passed on Exhibits P2 or P3 by either of the aforesaid respondents. Taking into account the aforesaid complaint, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the second respondent shall consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3, if the same has been received and is pending, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within four weeks of production of copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm