1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.08.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8149 of 2011 N.Nallammal ...Petitioner -Vs- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Karaiyur Police Station, Karaiyur, Pudukottai District. 5.K.Nallan ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to give full protection to the petitioner's husband S.Rajesh S/o. K.V.Samikannu and to herself, the friends of her husband, who helped them to enter into this inter-caste marriage, the parents and family members of her husband as they are all facing various threats and danger to their lives at the hands of the fifth respondent based on her representation. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents :Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 to R4. Mr.Palaniyandi for R5 O R D E R The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to give full protection to the petitioner's husband S.Rajesh S/o. K.V.Samikannu and to herself, the friends of her husband, who helped them to enter into this inter-caste marriage, the parents and family members of her husband as they are all facing various threats and danger to their lives at the hands of the fifth respondent based on her representation. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has got inter-caste marriage, the father of the petitioner who https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 is none other than the fifth respondent causing life threat to the petitioner and her husband. Hence, she has preferred a representation to the fourth respondent on 22.06.2011, but no order has been passed. Hence, she filed this petition. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side). 4.The learned Counsel appearing for the fifth respondent would submit that he has not made any life threat to the petitioner and her husband. He further undertakes that no further interference with a peaceful life of the petitioner and her husband. 5.Considering the submission made by the respective counsel, this Court is constrained to pass a direction to the third and fourth respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.06.2011 Accordingly, the third and fourth respondents are directed to consider the representation given by the petitioner herein dated 22.06.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits in accordance with law within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if necessary give a police protection in accordance with law. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Secretary,State of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 005. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Karaiyur Police Station, Karaiyur,Pudukottai District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.Na.Palaniyandi, Advocate, SR.No.26232 gsr : : GH : 11.08.2011 : 2p/7c Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8149 of 2011 04.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/