1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2487 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Smt. Varundevi Shorewala ..Respondent. Ms. Anamika Malhotra for appellant. Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Office objections are overruled. Registry is directed to register the appeal. At the instance of the revenue, appeal is taken up for admission. 2. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that so far as the first question is concerned, it is covered by the judgments of this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Sandeep Shorewala HUF in income Tax Appeal (L) No.2009/09 and 2010/09 dated 18th September, 2009. 3. So far as the second question is concerned, the same is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers P. Ltd. reported in [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421. In this view of the matter no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)