IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 499/2010 HANMANT S/O VITTHAL MAGAR VS. DAGDUSAHEB S/O RAMRAO SALUNKE AND ANOTHER Mr. M.C. Swami, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S.S. Choudhari, advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 28th June, 2011. PER COURT: 1. This second appeal is filed for challenging the concurrent finding of the Courts below that the appellant / defendant has no title to the suit plot of land. This suit plot of land is part of a lay out. The land of the lay out admittedly belong to the respondent No.1 Dagdu. It is also admitted fact that the appellant did not purchase the suit plot from Dagdu. It is his case that respondent No.2 sold to him the suit plot on the basis of certain agency agreement between Dagdu and respondent No.2. The Courts below held that the respondent No.2 had no authority to sell the suit plot to the appellant. In view of this, the Courts below held that the appellant has no title to claim the suit plot. The suit was therefore, decreed. There is no reason to disturb findings recorded by the Courts below. No substantive question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal should therefore, fail. The appeal is dismissed. [A.V. NIRGUDE,J.] ts k/2011/June28/sa499.10