1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9820 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri D.D. Rananaware for the Petitioners. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd January 2010. P.C.: . By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners have challenged an order of the Trial Court by which a prayer for appointing Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for local investigation has been rejected. The order is purely interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioners against a decree if the same be adverse to them. 2. Moreover, at an appropriate stage, if the Trial Court is satisfied that an appointment of the Court 2 Commissioner for local investigation is necessary, the impugned order will not preclude the Trial Court from appointing a Court Commissioner. 3. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)