IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.14744 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 23, 2011. Pritpal Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.P.C.Goel, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.P.C.Goel, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners are working as Research Assistants Grade-A which is a promotional post from Research Assistant Grade-B. They allege pay anomaly on the premise that the pay of of Research Assistants Grade- A is less than that of Research Assistants Grade-B. The alleged pay anomaly is highlighted by them in their representation dated 27.7.2011 CWP No.14744 of 2011 [2] (Annexure P-1). It is well settled that the questions as to whether or not there exists pay anomaly and the manner in which it can be removed, is essentially to be gone into by the Experts keeping various factors in view. This Court need not to express its opinion at this Stage. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to place the petitioners' claim before the Anomaly Committee constituted by the State of Punjab. The Anomaly Committee is directed to take a decision on the claim of the petitioners within a period of one year. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 23, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE