IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5579 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.5579 OF 2000 WRIT PETITION NO.5579 OF 2000 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.B.Parmar for the petitioner. Mr.D.A.Dube with Mr.M.S.Karnik for respondent no.1. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR,AG.C.J. & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR,AG.C.J. & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR,AG.C.J. & D.B.BHOSALE, J. D.B.BHOSALE, J. D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 8TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 8TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 8TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . By this petition, the petitioner seeks direction for grant of disability pension. The petition is hopelessly barred by latches. For 20 years the petitioner indulges in correspondence for getting pension. This explanation is grossly inadequate. It has been held by the Supreme Court in case of State of State of State of Orissa V. Pyarimohan Samantaray and Orissa V. Pyarimohan Samantaray and Orissa V. Pyarimohan Samantaray and Others AIR 1976 SC 2617 Others AIR 1976 SC 2617 Others AIR 1976 SC 2617 that the repeated representations cannot postpone period of limitation. Apart from that there is no plausible explanation of this delay. The petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of delay. The petition is disposed of accordingly. ...