HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5110 OF 2009 Thursday, the Twenty Third Day of December, Two Thousand and Ten Between Addepalli Nagaraju Petitioner AND Addepalli Rama Ratnam and another Respondents ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel on either side. The issue involved in this Civil Revision Petition is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment of this court in Lakshminagar Housing Welfare Association, Hyderabad, Vs. Syed Sami @ Syed Samiuddin and others ([1]), paragraph No.18 of which reads as under: “…The Full Bench view of Madras High Court in Kutumba Sastri is a binding precedent, which governs the position. Therefore, we hold that in a suit filed for cancellation of sale/conveyance deed, the Court fee shall have to be computed on the market value of immovable property (subject matter of the suit) as on the date of filing of the suit. In that view of the matter, learned VII Additional Senior Civil Judge was right in returning the plaint to appellant with a direction to pay Court fee as per the market value of suit schedule property as on the date of presentation of plaint and present it before proper Court. The order impugned is unsustainable….” In view of the above said judgment, I am of the opinion that the impugned order does not suffer from any legal or factual infirmity. Consequently, the Civil Revision Petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ Justice V.Eswaraiah December 23, 2010 MAS [1] 2010 (4) ALD 389 (D.B)