1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.2540/2006 Baij Nath vs. Badam Bai Date of Order ::::: February 16,2009 Present HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Mr. R.R.Baisla for the petitioner A petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by respondent Badam Bai against the petitioner in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Aklera whereby the Judicial Magistrate vide order dated 25.1.2006 directed the petitioner to pay Rs.800/- per month as maintenance to respondent from the date of application. Against this order the petitioner filed a revision in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Aklera. The revisional court by the judgment dated 31.10.2006 partly allowed the revision by reducing the amount of maintenance from Rs.800/- per month to Rs.700/- per month. The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order of the maintenance. 2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The orders passed by the courts below reveal that looking to the status and the evidence tendered by the petitioner and respondent the Magistrate has fixed the amount of monthly maintenance which was reduced by the revisional court. Therefore, there is neither any irregularity nor error in fixing the amount of maintenance. While deciding a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in such matters the factual aspects of the case cannot be looked into very minutely. Admittedly, the petitioner is the husband of respondent who has performed second marriage with Mangi Bai. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that no interference is required to be called for by this Court in the orders passed by the courts below in the exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Hence, the petition deserves to be dismissed. Consequently, the misc. petition stands dismissed. (Bhanwaroo Khan),J. bairwa