IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO. 5977/2010 Paras Ram & anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 09/07/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. R.R. Baisla for accused petitioners Mr. Amit Punia Public Prosecutor for the State ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. This application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. It is contended by the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner that there are cross cases between the complainant and the accused petitioner. Learned Advocate has also annexed Annexure-2 which is the compromise deed duly supported by an affidavit. The accused petitioners are not the habitual offenders. The offence alleged against them is triable by the Ist Class Magistrate. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration entire facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Resultantly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Parasram S/O Shri Sanwalia and (2) Hariom S/O Shri Parasram in FIR No. 141/2010 P.S. Laxmangarh, district Alwar they shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/ Investigating Officer, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each together with one surety each in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions: - 1) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA), J. Thanvi