IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 9TH AUGUST 2007 / 18TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 30143 of 2006(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ A. BABUKUTTAN, S/O.APPUKUTTAN, PARAYIL VEEDU, ALUMOODU, AYIROORPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAZHAKKUTTAM POLICE STATION, KAZHAKKUTTAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, MANGALAPURAM. 4. C.I.T.U. POTHENCODE UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, MOHANAN, PANCHAYATH BUILDING, POTHENCODE. 5. I.N.T.U.C. POTHENCODE UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, PRASANNAN, PANCHAYATH BUILDING, POTHENCODE. 6. A.I.T.U.C. POTHENCODE UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, SHUKOOR, PANCHAYATH BUILDING, POTHENCODE. 7. B.M.S. POTHENCODE UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, MANU, PANCHAYATH BUILDING, POTHENCODE. ADDL.R8. ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, KAZHAKKUTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DT. 27.11.2006 ON IA 16206/2006) R1 TO 3 & 8 BY G.P. SRI SALIM P.A. BY ADV. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF SMT.MOLLY JACOB SMT.RABIA BEEGAM T.K. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30143 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 9th day of August, 2007 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner submits that he is running an engineering workshop. The members of respondents Nos.4 to 7 approached the petitioner claiming loading and unloading work in the said establishment. It is also alleged that he was manhandled by them. So this writ petition was filed seeking police protection. 2. This court on 21.11.2006 directed the police to see that law and order is maintained. Petitioner submits that the in view of the said order, he was able to run his establishment. 3. We heard the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3 and also the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents. 4. If the party respondents have any claim for employment in the petitioner's establishment, they may move the statutory authorities and establish the same in appropriate proceedings. In view of the interim order mentioned above, no further orders are required in this petition. Accordingly it is closed. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR JUDGE HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. mt/