'""^ ^^••^.,.: ••.. KV'^'^Js ".-^ ^t C ^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBII.ASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^hr ^2906 PETITIONER <,vto.^...--, ON!<v-<f^-;>"...-^ ^ ~<3'^( ^' ?IStP-""" ! c^-.:--"' d»-":,, .'~^.--" l^" .. >^"" t^* RESPONDENTS :^-'Ram Lal Jagat, S/o. Shri Akti Ram Jagat, Aged about 43 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School - Naugdi, Block - Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^. District Education Officer, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) ^4'f Block Education Officer, Block - Basna Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT. WRITS, DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE hflATTER. r.o^i ^rt-^-'^' .A •^-^'^ .. ^^f ^f^^&^ ^G^^ •^te' ^^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. Petitfoner Resoondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.97 OF 2007 Jeewan Lal Sinha veisus State of ChhatUsgarh and othere ^ PeUttoner Resoondents Petitioner Resoondents Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.98 OF 2007 Chandrahas Shandilya versus State ofChhatBsgarh and othere WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.107 OF 2007 Mani Ram Sidar yereys State of Chhattisgarh and othere WRIT PETITION (S.t N0.108 OF 2007 Ram Lal Jagat versus Petitfoner Respondents State of ChhatBsgarh and others And WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.109 OF 2007 Dwij Ram Dhruw TOisys State of Chhattisgarh and othere Present : Mr. A.S. Rajput, counsel for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyerfor the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 1^'DayofJanuaiy, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionere as well as for the State/responctwts jointty submit that ttie facls and question of law involved in the present bateh of writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharaiiwaj vs. Murriclperi Corporation, Durg ancf anotfiei* . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ PeCtkm (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (fiopesft Kumar Verma vs. The Stete Govt of ChhatSsgarti and anotftei) and other connectedmatters, deckled by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Educatton Ewimination, tt was clarified that the nomenctature of the Basic Training InsUtute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed arKl renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Venna vs. The State Gavt. ofChhatttsgarii and smothw) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, Ihe writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decisfon of this Court in the matter <rf Yashwant Kwnar Oiaiadwa/ (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petiBoners have acquired B.EdYB.T.iyD.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the cireulare dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-19% and further whelher ftey have been paid two advance incremente or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of Iftis order be placed on the record of the connected writ petifions. Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotn Judge iubtesh 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96