^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.tS] No. 4766 of 2006 PETITIONER Munna Sao, s/o Sbri Bijli Sao, Aged about 43 years, workmg as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Priraary School Banbar&d, District-Durg(CG), R/o Church Colony, Ward No.13, Nandiai Nagar, Durg, District-Durg(CG) ycrsus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Sikshan District- 2. The Director Lok Saiichaaalay Raipur, Raipur(CG) 3. The Distnct Education OfEcer, Durg, District-Durg(CG) 4. Block Education OfBcer, Dhamdha, Durg, District-Durg(CG) SWrit Petitioa uader Article 226/227 of the Coastitutlon of Indial Appeai-ance: Shri Arun Shiikla, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Yashwaat Siagh G.A. for fhe State on advaace copy. ORAL ORDER (27.08.2007) SUNIL, KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard on adinission. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner subndts ttiat the petitioner has passed B.Ed. exaoiiaation on his own expenses, fherefore, he is entitled to receive two advance iacicinents according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. She also subinits fhat ia uiany identical matters, fhe petitions have been allowed iu tenns of fhe order passed in the case of YcishwaMt Kwnar Bharadww Vs. SIunidpal Conwration, flurg and another {200^ fIQ MP.ffi-CG^ 96^. He submits that the case of fhe petitioner is squarely covered by the said Judgment. W.P.No.4766/2006 This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for the State. However, he subinits fhat the order inay be passed in terms of the said judginent, but it shail be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is atlowed ia tenns of fhe order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and • arwther fSupra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether fhe petitioner had acquired D.Ed. Examiaation Certificate on his owa expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whefher he has been paid two advaiice incremeats or not. The petition staads fiaally disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge