IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5680 of 2011 AMIT KUMAR SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 This Court has pointed out through its observations on earlier occasions that if a Judge who is presiding over the Court of a rank of Sessions Judge is living under an impression that by rejecting the prayers for bail he will be approaching a safe zone and his career would remain unblemished, then he is living under completely a wrong notion. Efficiency of an officer is always measured by considering the quality of his order which he has passed under the facts of a particular case. If there was no material to justify the rejection of prayer for bail which could be legitimately made, then this Court views that not only the officer was inefficient but he was weak and untrained as well and this Court may be forced to direct that entries to that effect be made in the records of such officers. This Court has on earlier occasion, informed the lower Court Judges about the poor quality of judging which is being presented in the cases of the present nature. This is simply disturbing to find that an officer who is presiding over the Court of Session has not identified his judicial business and duties to perform properly and simply passed rejection orders on the prayer for bail under a whim. 2 Let a copy of this order be sent to the officers who disposed of bail petition nos.4764, 4837 and 5129 all of the year 2010 by the common order as regards the prayer for bail. Regard being had to the complete absence of the material let petitioner, namely, Amit Kumar Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010. Anand Kr./Prakash ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)