IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.409 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: January 25, 2007 State of Haryana. ….Petitioner VERSUS Lajwanti ….Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL PRESENT: Shri M.L.Saggar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). It is not in dispute that the Regular Second Appeal as well as the Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Haryana against the judgment and decree dated December 20,1993 have already been dismissed. The learned counsel further very fairly informs the Court that even objections petition filed by the judgment debtor petitioner have been dismissed by the executing Court and even a revision petition filed by the State of Haryana has already been dismissed on October 12, 2006. The learned counsel, however, informs that against the dismissal of the revision petition, a special leave petition is pending. Be that as it may, the fact that the decree in question has attained finality is apparent. In this view of the matter, the order passed by the executing Court cannot be held to be erroneous in any manner. CR NO.409 of 2007 -2- Dismissed. January 25, 2007 (Viney Mittal) KD Judge