IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.11395 of 2009 JEETANDRA PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302, 364/120B of the Indian Penal Code. The police after investigation found the accusation to be false against the accused persons including the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Raj Kumar Singh was the owner of the vehicle, which was driven by the informant’s son. He further submits that Raj Kumar Singh has already been allowed bail under order dated 30.01.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52317 of 2008. Pursuant to the earlier order of this court the petitioner has filed protest-cum-complaint petition filed by the informant contained in Annexure-B by way of supplementary affidavit. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M. Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Pakridayal P.S. case no. 38 of 2000 with the condition that he will not physically absent for two consecutive dates till three witnesses are examined. Uday/ (S. P. Singh, J.)