IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34251 of 2010 KAMAL YADAV @ KAMAL PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.10. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 13.04.2010 in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 364, 342, 323, 427, 307, 448, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that F.I.R. named accused Ram Chandra Ram alongwith others forcibly took the brother and mother of the informant on the Motor Cycle subsequently they got released. The mother subsequently did not name the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is involved in two other cases in which the petitioner is on bail. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner and informant known to each other as both residents of same police station and the petitioner’s name sprang up on confession of accused Ram Chandra Ram. 2 Considering the fact that the specific allegation in the F.I.R. is only against Ram Chandra Ram and one of the victim has not named the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Supaul, in connection with Marauna P.S. Case No. 04 of 2010, G.R. No. 122 of 2010. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)