( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 259 OF 1999 Bhausaheb s/o. Sambhaji More .. Appellant Versus Ramling s/o. Kallappa Banale and anr. .. Respondents Shri M.K. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S.G. Dargad, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mrs. B.R. Khekale, A.P.P. for respondent No.2. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 18.02.2010 P.C. :- 1. This appeal is filed by the original complainant as against order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ambajogai, in S.C.C. No. 613 of 1995, decided on 02.11.1996. 2. Today a compromise pursis signed by respondent No. 1, his advocate Shri S.G. Dargad and the advocate for the appellant Shri M.K. Deshpande is placed on record. It is taken on record and marked “Y” for identification. As per ( 2 ) the compromise prusis, respondent No.1/accused has paid amount of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) to the advocate for the appellant and the parties have compromised the matter. The amount is accepted by the learned advocate for the appellant Shri M.K. Deshpande under special authority received by him from his client. Adv. Shri M.K. Deshpande seeks leave to produce receipt regarding payment of amount received by him on behalf of his client on record in next week to avoid further complications. Leave granted. 3. In view of this, this appeal is disposed of as compromised. The order of acquittal of respondent No. 1/accused is confirmed in view of compromise of the appeal. Bail bond executed by him stands cancelled. 4. The Criminal Appeal is accordingly disposed of. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/FEB10/crap259.99