IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16791 of 2011 Dayanand Kuwar son of Late Ram Padarath Kuwar. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 04.07.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but in course of investigation it came to light that the victim boy had been kept in a restaurant in which the petitioner was working as Manager at the relevant time. The police raided the aforesaid restaurant and recovered the victim boy and as per submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, one co-accused Mantoo Kumar was also arrested by the police from the aforesaid restaurant in the above stated raid. The statement of victim has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. but in the aforesaid statement, he has stated nothing against the petitioner except this fact that Manager of the aforesaid restaurant made captive the co-accused Mantoo and he was released by him when the police reached there. The submission of learned counsel for the 2 petitioner is that the aforesaid conduct of Manager of the restaurant indicates that he was not involved in the alleged offence of kidnapping. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabd P.S. Case No. 649 of 2010. Ibrar/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)