IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1526 OF 2007 IN L.C. SUIT NO.4072 OF 1996 The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay ..Plaintiff. Vs. Sameer Agarbati Works and others ..Defendants. and Maersk (India) Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. .... Ms. V.S. Bhalekar with Mr. U.J. Makhija i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe for the Plaintiff. Mr. S.R. Rawell for Defendant No.3. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 11th December, 2007. P.C. : The Chamber summons is necessitated since the Respondent to the Chamber Summons has taken over the Third Defendant. Counsel appearing for the Respondent has no objection to the Chamber Summons being allowed. The Chamber Summons is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c ). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.