CF0000140490 ' Caz Q XXI-1gwhit) a; 1L y. mmm ms w / $§L £2, an / b Tv-Jkr Lrxm- g-zPvx—r w, wg-m#g7jaw G‘TO .9“) <‘W’T W :33Wm Vaigg “' gcgyxhiwwngfw§ LE m exp‘bmmei m ma mmmer that if he statas or wxshes to be Icpmsemted by lega& &mmmmw me Appeimte Cami Wm um maceexi mm she base {fox seven (iays uniess the [egan pracmwmet appeafs if the uegai practmomer «Eoas not appear wxthm sevem my?» Em maymm: imam at aiE .. if the primmcr staxes {iinat he does‘amt wish t0 ha mpxe- smmfL by WE pmctitmmst the mutt may pmceed at once with the case and will um 1w nbh’gw m giwe a hean'mg m any lagai ptwtitiamet wlw $houid appwx . at}? of myiimimn fax mm w’f Jmigmmmt ' 4»? L" g ‘ 13 f3 a We @E wh'm‘h mm“ WW' ’ ;%.~E§~_‘LE)Sa Dam «m win'ic% .Mvpwi mm ' L3» 9 ~ Ljg’éi‘ winathat ma mismer wishgw w'be represemted at not ~ Yes i Na . 3 -? C" auugkk m 3g) ’0‘ £98 Famm m me emgwwmmg M W4)? 34%)w W€Wm W WWW m gmmt whmh & «wpy 0f @weE passed m the mm fem" favomaf Erausmission m tha pmpenr émpemiam 6mm .‘, Swper§m€en&em Baa w? WM hi C. M. M73 6mm WEE 0f mi1p& femmi m mampmy Mmm 6f &pp€aa of we, Appeame (comm Na: Dateqi FMWIIEME m Em ‘Hmhxéhd imiuZ? 1'33,“ m Appahate Qourt u I A V \g E 0L 9 ! XI HL 78 WWW new 3* fete? {fem E a? aim alr" 1 Division Bench : HON’BLE SHRI FAKHRUDDIN, 30.06.2005 Shri Akhil Mishra for the ap Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, P. Both the counsel for the ap that the appellant-Ravi Shankari‘ has been released on 18th December 2002 from Central Jail Ghasidas Jayanti upon special rem Learned counsel for both t1 since the accused had already_ appeal has become infructuous. In view of the above subn counsel fog the parties, the appeal 1 ( ¢ Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge ellant. a. for the State. ellant as Well as State submit Bilaspur on the eve of Guru ission being granted. me parties further submit that undergone the sentence, the dssicns made by the learned s dismissed as infructuous. R4 Sd/- j‘iDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh§ Judge aw we (insignia)