1 chs1593-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Chamber Summons No.1593 of 2010 in Suit No.1616 of 1981 Puliyakote P. Sukumar & Others .. Plaintiff v/s. Ramesh Chandra Dutt & Ors. ..Defendant Mr.Ajay Panicker i/b. Ajay Law Associates for the Plaintiff. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 21st January, 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Ajay Panicker. The office has wrongly directed learned Advocate Mr. Panicker to take out this Chamber Summons for dispensing with Notice under Order 21 Rule 22. The decree came to be passed on 2.22.1987. The execution application was lodged on 12.10.1989 i.e. execution application was filed within two years. Hence there is no question of requirement of complying with Order 21 Rule 22. The oral directions issued by the office are without any jurisdiction. Office to proceed with notice under Order 2 chs1593-10.sxw 21 Rule 34 of CPC. 2. In view of the aforesaid observations and orders this chamber summons need not be prosecuted. Hence is disposed of with no order as to costs. 3. Office to proceed with the execution in accordance with the provisions of law. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]