IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1386 of 2008 MADHUSUDAN SINGH Versus SIDHESHWAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 29.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order rejecting the application of the petitioner for impleadment of party, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The grievance of the petitioner that he has certain right in the suit property being a lease holder and may be prejudiced on account of the decree which can be passed in the suit in which he has not been allowed to be impleaded, in the opinion of this Court seems to be wholly misconceived. It is a settled principle of law that a decree would bind only the parties to the suit. If the petitioner has any further grievance, he has always a right to maintain his independent suit. This being the settled principle of law, this Court would not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)