IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15318 of 2009 BIKASH KUMAR @ GUDDU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 20.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under sections 394 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner surfaced through the confessional statement of the co-accused Md. Umar Alam @ Bablu Mian. It is next contended that similarly placed co-accused, namely, Md. Jahangir @ Vicky has been granted bail by this Court under order dated 20.07.2009, passed in Cr.Misc.No. 16646 of 2009. It appears that the petitioner carries criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a supplementary affidavit draws attention of this Court to the averment made in paragraph 3. It is next contended that he is in custody since 01.02.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2009, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member and that the petitioner shall appear in person before the concerned 2 officer-in-charge or any other officer present at the police station once in a month (preferably on Saturday or Sunday) for a period of five months from the date of his release. In case of default in such appearance, the officer-in-charge shall promptly report the matter to the court in seisin of the case, whereafter the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )