IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16452 of 2010 BISHUNDEO BHAGAT SON OF LATE RAMASHISH BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.5.2010 Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph 1 and the prayer portion of the petition in course of the day. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 47A of the Excise Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner is landlord of the premises where the recovery was effected but the same has been let out to co-accused Niraj Singh, who was using it as a godown. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 13.3.2010 and undertakes not to indulge in similar activities, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in Sonepur P.S.case No.263 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors shall be the wife of the petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in - 2 - any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )