IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU C.R.P.NO.1515 OF 2009 Date:03.02.2011 Between:- The Commissioner representing Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad City. ..Petitioner And T.Raja Rao and another .. Respondents ORDER:- The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 12-02-2009 in E.A.No.34 of 2009 in E.A.No.125 of 2003 in E.P.No.117 of 1994 in O.S.No.3207 of 1991 on the file of X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad whereunder and whereby, the petition filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C.’) to receive certain documents and mark them as documentary evidence on its behalf, was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Though the genuineness of the documents is not in dispute, the trial Court dismissed the petition, which is filed by the petitioner to receive the documents. The genuineness of the document viz., sanctioned lay out plan dated 16-02-1963 is not in dispute. The relevancy and admissibility of documents with regard to the facts and circumstances of the case has to be decided along with the other evidence available on record. Therefore, when the genuineness of the documents itself is not in dispute, the trial Court ought to have received the documents. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. E.A.No.34 of 2009 in E.A.No.125 of 2003 in E.P.No.117 of 1994 in O.S.No.3207 of 1991 filed by the petitioner is allowed directing the trial Court to receive the documents, subject to objection with regard to admissibility and relevancy. 4. The Civil Revision Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. _​_____________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 3rd February, 2011 AMD