1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3342 OF 2010 (Shri Pipeshwar Natthuji Zade vs. Sau. Minakshi Pipeshwar Zade) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 21, 2010. Heard Shri Dhote, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Chute, learned counsel for the respondent. The copy of impugned order is not very clear. At one stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that it is true translation and later on stated that it is a true copy. He, however, could not produce either the certified copy or the photostat copy of the impugned order. Shri Chute, learned counsel has contended that the respondent – wife has produced before the trial Court a certificate issued by the Competent Authority showing that he is residing along with his brother at Butibori. The impugned order as filed does not show consideration of any such document. The recent document mentioned therein is dated 19.07.2009 filed by the respondent – wife and that document is issued by Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Yeranwadi, District – 2 Wardha. Thus, document stated by Shri Chute, learned counsel is not considered by the trial Court. As the correct copy of order is not produced by the petitioner, in stead of adjourning the matter for further hearing, I find that the interest of justice can be met with by directing the petitioner to pay cost of Rs.3,000/- to the respondent as compensation by filing such petition. Cost be paid by 10th October 2010 by depositing the same before the trial Court i.e. 8th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur. If the costs are so deposited, the trial Court shall permit the respondent – wife to withdraw the same. The trial Court shall then rehear the application at Exh. 10 and pass fresh orders in the matter in accordance with law. Writ Petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute accordingly. JUDGE *GS.