-3 IN THB HIGH COURT OF JCDICATURE AT BXLASPUR CHHATTISGAHH ^-_ /2006 PETI'B'IONER RESP'ONDENTS ^"w^ ^^-•/ ^'.^ ^••^''yy- -//^:^^" ^y (<?'.A-'' o^ ,^^^^ ^ r.P. N0. ^ Loknath Thakur, S/o. Pekurani Thakur, Aged about 36 years, R/o. Imlibhata,; Ward No.2, Mahasamund, Distt Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS 1] State of Cbhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2] 3] CoUector, Mahasaniund, Mahasamund (CG) District 41 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CGI Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (CG) ^' 51 District Education Officer, Mahasamund, Distt Mahasamund (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 236/327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA K XI-HC-22 'S^ •-liW\v\^, w-Aww, Kwwy 3H^t ^I R-ji?b 31)^1 5b^ •^fef ^•'P^o.. 4'?^/&'<' sn^t '^<nwtfei *%.' f^l/^ftM' ihn Manoi l-'ara .Shri G.K. Beriva!;Dy..Advoca1|s General to the petitiftneras Shiksha Karmi G| pursuant to .this Qfder, the petitionef was cancelted and an amended seil chi<LiIci41Ti TTp^rf '^f&^ •I.^I^K ^7 aipgit gtiiw for the petltioner. Learned cdunsel for the petiti^ner submitted that appointment order ade !lt was issued on 20-7-1998'and' joined. Subsequentiy the earlier list sction listwas published on 3-9-1998 and in this, iist aiso.the pstitioner ^jras seiected .on the post of Shiksha karmi Grade- ill. Thereafter the listdfeted 3-9-1998 was.also canceiled and fresh list was publish^d 9-10-19' sen/ices have been reoularized but 20-7-1998 to 9-1-0-1998 has not submitted that the petitioner submitt per Annexures P-8 and P-9 dated 1: its of thecase.in the opinii seri/ed if a direction is glven to representation ralsing his grievance^ respondents along with a copy of on 13-5-2005, petitioner's his three moriths earlier seroice froiTi been considered for seniority; He 3d representations to the Collector as >-12-2005 and 18-1 -2006 respectively bui the sarne have not been decided, CQunse! for the State submjts that for the present the petitioner may be directed to file a fresh repre^entation to the authori.ties concerned, which shall be considered on its ownl h'aving considered and witl^out expressing any opinion on the |3f this Court, ends of jystice wii! be the petitioner to rnake a detaii^i before the CQmpetent authority of the the petition and this order, within'.15 days, and on such representatipn ^eihg fiied, the competent authonty of [Tft^ ^f^^ ;:^-' g^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I^ 'XI-HC-22 ^%"l|141<«l<l;d^WJ<«; llKRITWTIcb ^n^T fRTaR\ ? , ..^ •f'.'^^^&^^4;. "^ 200 StI^I^iT ft-ti'b sn^r st)*lN) ^f?^;. sn^r ^gigi ^f?d fehe respondents shal] decide the sam^ [wifh law as early as possib!e preferabiYl ireceipt of the represeniation by a petitioner may be heard. it is mads ciear t'nat ifthe petiti^iner may avaii the remedy avaiiabie underth^ With the aforesaid observations, tfii Consequently I.A. No. 2273/200E Certifiedcopy asper rules. : <+>Hl^<4iT1 iTF^Tf ^ f^T?t ^f-^R ^? sipaq sn^r . on its own merits in aceordance within two months from the date of easoned 'order; if required, the r's grievances stili remains, he law. : is petition stands disposed of. also stahds disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [V^ Vvsi\ ^