IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No. 3027 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 18, 2009 Rahim Khan and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present: Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 58811 of 2009 Allowed, as prayed for. Crl. Revision No. 3027 of 2009 The learned counsel states that, for the moment, he would content if the impugned order is set aside qua issuance of non-bailable warrants against the petitioners. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.S. Pattar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. It is apparent from the record that the learned Trial Judge opted to issue non-bailable warrants against the Crl. Revision No.3027 of 2009 petitioners vide the very order their summoning was ordered under Section 319 Cr.P.C. That order is set aside. It would be deemed to have been substituted by an order for issuance of summonses. Disposed of accordingly. November 18, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2