WP(C) 350/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE U.B. SAHA The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners ten (10) in numbers, whose name has been shown as teachers of an approved Venture school mentioned in the letter dated 31.8.2004 written by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Hailakandi, r espondent No.5 to the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, respondent No.2 f or setting aside the letter of the respondent No.10 dated 6.1.2011 (Annexure-9) to the writ petition and also for a direction to the State-respondents to accord financial assistance to the schools of the petitioners on the basis of the list submitted by the authorities as available in Annexure-1,4,5,6 and 7 of the writ petition. Heard Mr. N.H. Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner s as well as Mr. M.R. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department app earing for the respondent Nos.1,2 and 4 to 8. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties appearing before thi s Court at this stage and considering the nature of the prayer in the writ petit ion, the instant writ petition is taken up for final disposal. The pleaded case of the petitioners in brief is as follows - The petitioners are head teachers of venture L.P. Schools of Hailakandi District and their names are included in the list of venture L.P. Schools of the said District prepared and submitted by the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Hailak andi, respondent No.5 to the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, respondent No.2 in the year 2004 (Annexure-1) to the writ petition i.e. serial Nos.72 of K atlicherra Constituency, 35 of Katlicherra Constituency, 35 of Katlicherra Const ituency, 74 of Hailakandi Constituency, 4 of Katlicherra Constituency, 55,66 and 86 of Algapur Constituency and 31 & 43 of Katlicherra Constituency. As per the policy decision (Annexure-2) to the writ petition of the Government of Assam, a fresh list of venture L.P. Schools of Hailakandi District have been submitted by the District Elementary Education Officer, Hailakandi to the Deputy Commissione r for proper verification who in his turn submitted the list to the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam vide letter dated 12.8.2010 and 17.9.2 010 (Annexure 4 and 6) respectively. It is also further pleaded that the names o f the petitioners schools have been included in the verified and authenticated l ist and ultimately in the final venture list relating to the Hailakandi District , the names of the petitioners schools have been excluded and being aggrieved by the said action of the respondents, the petitioners filed the instant writ peti tion. Mr. Mazarbhuya, learned counsel for the petitioners while urging the rel ief sought for submits that once the names of the petitioners schools have been included in the venture list and the names of the petitioners were shown as teac hers of the respective schools, the State-respondents has no right to exclude th eir names without providing any opportunity to them and includes some other name s of the L.P. Schools in the list of the venture schools. According to him, the respondent No.10, Additional Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi committed gross inj ustice to the petitioners vide his letter dated 6.1.2011 (Annexure-9) to the wri t petition wherein he included 294 nos. of venture L.P. Schools leaving the scho ols of the petitioners though the names of the petitioners school were in the ea rlier list. Therefore, it will be appropriate for the Court to quash the Annexur e-9 to the writ petition and also direct the respondent No.2 to treat the school of the petitioners in the list of the venture school. Mr. M.R. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department submits that it would meet justice if the entire writ petition is dispose of with a dire ction if the petitioners are directed to make a representation before the Direct or of Elementary Education, respondent No.2 within a period five (5) days raisin g all their grievances and the respondent No.2 shall dispose of the same within a reasonable time. I have gone through the records as available and also considering the su bmissions of the learned counsel for the parties, according to this Court, the s ubmissions of Mr. Pathak is a reasonable one. Hence the instant writ petition is disposed of as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties with the follow ing direction. The petitioners shall file a representation within two (2) weeks from today raising all the grievances and the respondent No.2 on receipt of the said representation along with the copy of this order shall dispose of the same by a speaking order within one (1) month and till then, the State-respondents sh all not act on the letter dated 6.1.2011 written by the Deputy Commissioner, Hai lakandi, In Charge (Annexure-9) to the writ petition subject to no benefit as gi ven meanwhile. With the aforesaid order, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.