IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App No. 970 of 2006 Smt. Jagir Kaur & others. ……… Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. ……… Respondents Mr. K.S. Bora, Advocate for the applicants / petitioners Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent No. 1 State. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. I have heard the detailed arguments of Mr. K.S. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners; Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate; and Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2. I have also perused various documents on record of the case file and find that, indeed, the commission of offences prima facie does appear to have been made out against the petitioners. I am convinced that in the fact and circumstances of this case. interference by this Court in exercise of this Court’s jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC is not warranted. The petition accordingly is dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 21.05.2008 G