-: 1 :- SPB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2285 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1879 OF 2008 Beam Developers Pvt. Ltd., ...Plaintiffs. V/s. 1. Furuk Jusuph Motiwala & Ors. .. Defendants. --- Mr. Snehal Shah i/by Narayanan & Narayanan for the plaintiffs. Mr. Tushar Gujjar i/by Mahimtura & Co. for the defendant no.5. --- CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2008. DATED : 21ST OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs and the learned counsel appearing for the 5th defendant. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs states that 1st and 2nd defendants are duly served. He states that the third defendant has since expired. He, therefore, seeks permission to delete the name of the 3rd defendant. Accordingly permission is granted to delete the name of the third defendant. -: 2 :- 3. My attention has been invited to the ad-interim order dated 22nd July, 2008 passed by this court. By the said order, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of the notice of motion was granted. There is no contest by the first and second defendants. The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs states that at this stage, the plaintiffs are pressing only the prayer clause (a). 4. The first and second defendants have chosen not to oppose the notice of motion. 5. Hence, ad-interim relief granted on 22nd of July, 2008 deserves to be confirmed. 6. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 7. First and the second defendants shall produce the documents referred to in prayer clause (a) within a period of eight weeks from the date of the service of the authenticated copy of this order to the said defendants. 8. Parties concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this order issued by the Registry. -: 3 :- (A.S. OKA, J.)