IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2010 / 19TH SRAVANA 1932 RP.No. 562 of 2010 ---------------------- AGAINST JUDGMENT IN WA 2780/2007 DATED 12.3.2010 REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER --------------------------------------------------------- T.C.JOSE, ASST.ENGINEER (CIVIL)(RETD.), STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD KAP SCHEME, THARIYODU P.O., WAYANAD, THOPPIL HOUSE, MANALUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHIBHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER (CIVIL), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHIBHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.N.Ravindran, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P.No.562 of 2010 in W.A.No.2780 of 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of August, 2010 ORDER Ravindran, J. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. What the review petitioner seeks in essence is a rehearing of the writ appeal which is not permissible in a review petition. The Division Bench of this Court while dismissing the writ appeal filed by the review petitioner had noticed that the review petitioner would not have been in a better position even if leave had been granted under Appendix XII-A of Part I of the Kerala Service Rules for the reason that such leave will not count for pension. In such circumstances, we find no grounds to entertain this review petition. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice P.N.Ravindran, Judge vns