*1* appa.446.11.apeal.1398.03.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.446 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1398 OF 2003 Javed Abdul Rashid Khan. ..Applicant/Accused No.4 -Versus- The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent ........... Mr.Rajesh Gupta i/b Sharif Shaikh, for the Applicant. Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State. .......... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE & A.M.THIPSAY, JJ. Date : 13th April, 2011. P.C. 1 We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant/ accused No.4 who came to be acquitted in Sessions Case No.154/2002. The said order of acquittal passed against the accused Nos.1 to 7 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 r/w. 120-B of the Indian Penal Code alongwith other offences is a subject matter of challenge in Criminal Appeal No.1398/2003 filed by the State Government and admitted on 01.12.2003. 2 The plea for being released on bail under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as made by the accused Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 was rejected by the Sessions Court and therefore, they approached this Court in Criminal Application Nos.979/2004, 1051/2004 and 1120/2004 and these applications came to be rejected on 16.03.2004. Consequently, the acquitted accused approached the Supreme Court and came to be released on bail but on certain conditions including the condition of reporting to the concerned Police Station during the *2* appa.446.11.apeal.1398.03.sxw pendency of the appeal. 3 It appears that the Applicant had filed Criminal Application No.490/2007 for relaxation of bail condition and on 12.06.2007, this application was partly allowed by the Division Bench of this Court relaxing the condition of attendance at the Police Station. It was directed that the Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station once in the first week of every month commencing from the first week of July, 2007. 4 By this application, it is prayed that the condition of reporting to the Police Station even once in a month be deleted. In our considered opinion, the said condition is not unreasonable and in any case, if the condition of bail has been set out by the Supreme Court, the Applicant’s remedy, in normal course, would be before the very same Court. 5 The application is, therefore, rejected. (A.M.THIPSAY, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)