IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8466 of 2011 SATYENDRA SINGH RATHORE @ BUNTY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.06.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner bringing this fact that the petitioner has been declared juvenile by the competent authority vide order dated 13.04.2011 passed in G.R. No. 2812 of 2010 corresponding to JJB case No. 34 of 2011. In my view, this Cr. Misc. case is not maintainable, particularly, in the light when the petitioner has been declared juvenile and now wants to get benefit under the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act. Accordingly, this Cr. Misc. case stands dismissed being not maintainable. However, it is made clear that this order will not prejudice the mind of the Juvenile Justice Board while dealing with the prayer for bail under the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act. It is needless to say that the Juvenile Justice Board shall consider the bail petition of the petitioner if it is filed under the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)