AB 813/2011 BEFORE HON\BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Ms. T Som , learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BS Sinha, l earned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by accused peti tioner namely, Paramesh Barman praying for releasing him on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with CID Police Station Case No. 11 of 2011 under Sect ions 120 (B)/448/419/384 of the Indian Penal Code. Also perused the case diary. The allegation against the petitioner is that he in association with one Anup Ha zarika were found extorting money from the informant’s business premises, alongw ith the petitioner. In this connection, an enquiry was conducted by one DSP, CID, Assam and as per his report, the said Anup Hazarika was the DSP of Border Branch, under Kamrup Su perintendent of Police. But he impersonated himself as Inspector of CID for exto rting money from the business house. The petitioner’s version is that the informant had taken a loan of Rs. 1 Lakh an d on the relevant day, he had gone to the factory of the informant to collect mo ney. However, no documentary evidence of giving loan of Rs.1 Lakh has been annex ed with the bail application nor there is any mention for the purpose of giving the said money in the bail application. In fact, the amount of loan has also not been mentioned in the bail application. Having regard to all the aspects, I hold that it is not a fit case to grant anti cipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.