IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13048 of 2011 UDAY KUMAR JAISAWAL S/O BHAGWAT PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.15462 of 2011 BHAGWAT PRASAD S/O LATE VISHWANATH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and Mr. Dashrath Mehta and Sunil Kumar Pathak, counsels for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 420, 379 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that complainant being the rice mill owner supplied 35 tonnes rice to the petitioner and Bhagwat Prasad but Bhagwat Prasad paid only Rs. 50,850/- to the complainant and issued cheque for Rs. 4,50,000/- which subsequently got bounced when the complainant went to ask for the money then petitioner Uday Kumar Jaiswal took the signature of the complainant on six stamp papers on the point of pistol. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there was a land dispute between the parties and the alleged plain paper on which the complainant's signature was obtained has not been used anywhere. Moreover, the petitioners' side lodged the complaint case against the complainant in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 384 and 379 Cr.P.C. Considering the contractual nature of accusation and the case lodged by the petitioner's side at the earlier point of time, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1170 of 2010, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)