1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1012 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1018 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1024 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1026 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1028 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1030 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1050 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1052 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1054 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1056 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1058 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1060 OF 2008 WITH CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1062 OF 2008 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S. Dewani, Advocate for applicants. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : MARCH 23, 2009. 1. These cases involve investigation into defalcation of 2 Government money in construction activities carried out under “Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojna”. The allegations are that the work was not carried out as per scheme namely, by not at all employing local labourers, preparing fake muster rolls, showing wrong measurements to the extent of showing that river Kanhan is at a distance of 180 kms. from the spot, where sand was to be transported. The amounts, which have been misappropriated by two persons i.e. Sectional Engineer and Deputy Engineer, who were the officers on spot, charged with duty to certify the measurements and expenditure run into lacs of rupees. 2. If the applicants consider reimbursing the Government 50% of the amount, which the Government has lost on account of applicants criminal activities, their applications for grant of bail can be considered. 3. The learned counsel for the applicants undertakes to seek instructions and inform the Court on 31st March, 2009. 3 4. Should the applicants be unwilling, then question, whether custodial interrogation of the applicants would be necessary, would be considered on case to case basis. 5. S.O. to 31st March, 2009. 6. Steno copy of this order be furnished to the parties as per rules. JUDGE RR.