\l Sinaie Vs. Parasnath Paikra Son of Shri Kuldeep Ram Paikra, aged about 53 years, Resident of Viliage Dumariya, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) Dr. H.L.Prajapati, aged about58 years, Son of Not Know, Seoretary, Department of Veterinar^ Services and Agriculture (Animal Husbandry), D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ContemBLPetifion under Article215oftheConstitution of India.read with SectionJ O & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. None present for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, G.A. for the respondent. (Passed on 16m April, 2!»7) This Court while disposing of the Writ Petition (S) No. 4443 of 2006, had directed the respondents to oonsjder the representation that may be filed by the petitioner, in- accordance with law. (2) Alteging that the respondent has not compiied with the orders and directions issued by this Court, the petitioner is before this Cctirt-i" this contempt petition. Notice was issued and sen/ed on the respondent. The respondent has appeared through Gove'rnment Advocate. (3) Learned Government Advocate submits that the respondent has considered the representation filed by the petitioner by order dated 11.04.2007 and has withdrawn theearlierorderoftransfer. (4) In my opinion, as on today, there is substantial compliance of the orders and directions issued by this Court. Therefore, further proceedings i'B ^ z- in tliis contempt petition need not be continued. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Ordered accordingly. : Sd/- Chief Justice