IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.4465 OF 2006 Between:- Bonela Sankaram …Petitioner A n d State Bank of India, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Ichapuram, Srikakulam District. …Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.4465 OF 2006 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 27-07-2006 in I.A.No.92 of 2006 in O.S.No.50 of 2004, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sompeta, Srikakulam District, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein for release of the registered sale deed dated 05-03-1993, which was deposited with the respondent-bank by way of mortgage, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for the respondent. Perused the record. 3. The respondent-bank filed the suit for recovery of money of Rs.2,36,417-45 Ps from the petitioner on the strength of a mortgage by deposit of title deeds viz., sale deed. The petitioner-defendant filed written statement raising various pleas and also making a counter-claim for Rs.95,902/-. While the trial was pending, the petitioner filed I.A.No.92 of 2006 seeking return of the sale deed, which was deposited with the respondent-bank by way of mortgage. The respondent-bank opposed the said application. By the impugned order, the trial Court dismissed the said petition on the ground that without deciding the right of the plaintiff to enforce the mortgage, the suit document cannot be returned. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition. By interim order dated 15-09-2006 in CRP.MP.No.6193 of 2006, this Court granted interim direction subject to condition of the petitioner depositing the entire suit amount to the credit of the suit and the respondent-bank was given liberty to withdraw the same without furnishing any security, however, subject to result of the suit, including the counter-claim. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the interim direction has been complied with and the suit amount of Rs.2,36,417-45 Ps was deposited to the credit of the suit on 13-10-2006. The claim of the respondent-bank in respect of the subsequent interest and suit costs and also the counter-claim made by the petitioner-defendant are yet to be adjudicated upon by the trial Court. 5. In the circumstances, having regard to the fact that the suit is of the year 2004, it is considered just and appropriate to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit itself at an early date, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of with the above direction. Interim direction granted earlier stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 07th February, 2011 Lrkm.