IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16811 of 2010 YOGENDRA CHAUDHARY @ GORKHA CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Sections 379, 411 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Annexure-2, the seizure list reflects that the alleged auto rickshaw was recovered near the shop of one Surendra Ram. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the seizure list reflects that actually the seizure has been made from the petitioner. Considering the facts that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the place of recovery does not reflect the name of the petitioner though the seizure list was handed over to the petitioner, let the petitioner namely Yogendra Chaudhary @ Gorkha Chaudhary, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 2 Ist Class, Hilsa(Nalanda) in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 295 of 2009. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)