`IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 3687-M of 2008 Date of decision : February 14, 2008 Darshan Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. This is a petition for direction to respondent No. 2 to ensure that the petitioner and his family members are not harassed at the hands of respondents No. 4 and 5 in connivance with respondent no. 3 and further for taking appropriate action on the complaint dated February 02, 2008 (Annexure P-3). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner submitted a complaint dated February 02, 2008 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents no. 2 and 3 for taking action but no action has been initiated on the application of the petitioner. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for investigation or registration of FIR could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. February 14, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge