1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.695/2010 in CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.694/2010. (The State of Maharashtra Vs. Dayanand Baburao Suryawanshi and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATE : 2 nd August, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.SD Kaldate, learned APP for State and Mr.Manoj Shinde, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. 2) This is an application preferred by the applicant/State for condonation of delay of 8 days caused in filing the accompanying application, seeking leave to file appeal against judgment and order of acquittal dated 7.11.2009. 3) Mr.Shinde, learned Counsel for the respondent opposed the present application vehemently and submitted that it bears no substance and same is therefore, liable to be rejected. 4) For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the said delay is not 2 willful, deliberate and intentional and certainly it is not inordinate and the delay deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5) In the result, the present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and delay of 8 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal, stands condoned and present application is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P.DAVARE) JUDGE bdv/cran695.10