IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8692 of 2008. Decided on: 11.03.2011. _____________________________________________________ Sunil Sharma and others. … Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate for respondent No.2. None for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral).: It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in V.K. Behl and others v. State of H.P. & others, Latest HLJ (2009) 402. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of in view of the principles of law laid down by this 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - Court in the judgment cited hereinabove. However, it is made clear that the order has been passed subject to the outcome of decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.L.P. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. March 11, 2011. (sck).