IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3471 of 2010 PINTU CHAUHAN SON OF YOGENDRA CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 20.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B and 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though in the first information report the allegation was that the in-laws killed the deceased for non- fulfilment of demands of dowry, but during investigation certain witnesses stated that the deceased had consumed poison after an altercation with the mother-in-law. The doctor also opined that the death was on account of poisoning. A report was called for from the trial court about the stage of the trial and it appears that despite charges having been framed on 24.6.2009 only one witness has been produced by the prosecution up till date. In view of such, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.5, Nalanda at Biharsharif in S.Tr.No.26 of 2009 arising out of Chandi P.S.case No.90 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any - 2 - change in the address of the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )