GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1171 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRI. CRI. CRI. APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. B.R.Patil APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT. SMT. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 18TH MARCH, 2005 18TH MARCH, 2005 18TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this application, State prays for leave to appeal against the order passed by the learned trial Judge. The entire prosecution arises out of group clash in co-operative elections. The learned Judge has properly appreciated the evidence. It is really difficult to positively find any of the rioters guilty. In such circumstances, the order of acquittal cannot be called perverse. Hence leave rejected. ....