1 wp617.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 617 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.T. Ghute, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. 1. Heard Advocate Shri. Ghute for petitioners. He strenuously contends that in time barred appeal, the order which was already executed has been stayed exparte. According to him in this peculiar situation, the Writ Petition has been filed directly before this Court. 2. Learned A.G.P. appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2 states that the respondent no.1 could have been approached with this grievance and that grievance would have been redressed by now. 3. Exparte interim order is passed on 03.09.2010 and the Petition has been filed on 23.11.2010. In this situation, the interest of justice can be met with by permitting the petitioners to move the respondent no.1 for 2 wp617.11 vacation of that relief and by directing the respondent no.1 to consider his application on its own merits at the earliest. Needless to mention that the contentions raised by the petitioners are kept open for further consideration at the appropriate stage. 4. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 27.01.2011 gas/wp617.11