IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21477 of 2010 SANAULLA @ MD. SANAUL SON OF LAL MOHAMMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.6.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that when the informant went to the house of the petitioner, he found his daughter dead with bleeding from her ears and her neck swollen. He further states that he found the petitioner weeping. Thereafter the present case was instituted and postmortem examination was conducted. The doctor opined that no exact cause of death could be detected and he did not find any external injury on the person of the deceased. Subsequently the F.S.L. reported that in fact there was phosphate detected in the viscera. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 19.3.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Azamnagar P.S.case No.4 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police - 2 - papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )