BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12168 of 2011 P. VIRUMANDI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.215/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.3 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 324 and 307 I.P.C. in Crime No.215 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A3 and the case has been filed against the petitioner under Sections 147,148,294(b),341,324 and 307 I.P.C. He further submits that the alleged occurrence took place on 06.09.2011 and already the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he pray for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that the alleged occurrence took place on 06.09.2011 due to previous enmity the occurrence took place and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. He further submits that A4 to A6 were arrested and remanded to judicial custody and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, it is seen that the alleged occurrence took place on 06.09.2011 and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfere with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 20/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPARANKUNDRAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.32330 SR : 22.09.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12168 of 2011 Date :20/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/