CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIU N0.128/2010 Bihan Sai, S/o Kotor Ram, Aged 37 years, R/o Devgarh Sitapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) Sri R.K.Tiwari, Chief Executive Engineer, Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ^^^^r^. s ^s s'-'i'^/ i Aosearancs: Sanjay Patei, Counsel for the petitioner. :( f^f.f le [ .4^ rffrt. »*^^» B) SUNIL KUJVIAR SINHA. J. Heard. Petitioner -Bihan Sai has filed this petition for initiatlon of proceedings of contempt against the respondent for willfu! disobedience of the order dated 16 of December 2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.7337/2009. This Court whiie disposing of the aforesaid writ petition passed the foilowing order on 16 December 2009 : "2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw thls petition with iiberty to pursue the representation dated 23-10-2009 (Annexure - P/5) pending before the Chief Executive Otficer, Janpad Panchayat Sitapur, District Sarguja. Learned counsel also prays that the respondent authorittes may kindly be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner at the eartiest. A CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIU N0.128/2010 ') 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the pending representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and on its own perspective, within a period of four weeks from the date receipt of a copy of this order." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the representation was not decided in time, She petltiQner had to file this contempt petition. A repiy to the contempt petition has been filed. It has been contended by the respondent that the representations filed by the petitioner have been decided on 09.07.2010. The copy of the order has been annexed as shyna Learned counsel for the respondent submits that there is some delay in compliance of the order passed by this Court and the respondent has tendered unconditional apotogy for the same vide para 1 and 5 of the repiy supported by an affidavit. He submits that the retevant records pertaining to the appointment made in the year 2007 were seized by the office of the C.E.O., Zila Panchayat, Sarguja for conducting inquiry wlth regard to making of forged and fabricated appointment and since all the records of the petitioner were not availabte in the office of the respondent, his representations were not decided within the time granted by this Court. Since the representations, now, have been decided by order dated 09.07.2010 and the delay has been explained by the respondent with unconditional apology for the same, 1 do not deem it appropriate to proceed t'urther in the matter. Accordingly, the proceedings of contempt are dropped. SdT^2~ SunilKumarSinha Judge