H!GH CCURT GF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR Wra Pet§t§on @l Na 1353 0f 2&08 Petkimer Smt. andai Kumari: Aged Absut — 5S Years, S/o- Late Faguram Porte, Rio ~ ViEEage- Ghatbarra. Post— Tara, Thesi! — Ambikapur, Disit. Surguia (CE) Respandems 1. State 0f Chhatti3garh, Through its Secretary. Eepartment of Health. DK§ Bhawan, Raipur {(3.3} Chief medical Qfficer, Distt. surguja {c.G.) 2. Coifector, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 'a 4. DistriGt Treasurer, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 5. Accountant $eneraL Raipur {CG} $§ngle Beach : Han'bre Mr, Satish K. Agraihotri J. Shri Aii Asgar, Advocate for the petitioner. “’i U. N. S. Des, Govt. Advscaie €ar the reapandents Ne. 3 to 4. Miss Sharmiia Singhai. Assistant Soiioitor Genera! tor the Union of indie! Respondent Na. 5. U' I! CRAL ORDER (Passed on this 28m day of March, 2608) ;.u With the cement at teameé caunaet appearing fer the parties, the matter ts heard finally. This matter pe aine to retrial dues. This Caurt in the matter 0f Writ Fetition No. 4542l2004'(Bai,inath Manda! Vs. The $tate at Chhattiegarh a others) and ether connected matters, decidee en 3i .1 .2008, directed the Committee t6 consider the matter of retriai eues as the disputed question 0f fac were invohreci. The Ccmmittee was censtitated by the State Governmeht, pursuant to the Greer dated‘ 19.6.2006 passett ih WPNO. 1953/2006 {Shit Keia Bai hanerakar ‘rls. State Government and ethers) and erder dated 13.32908 passed in Mac, No. iG5i2908 ( tete cf Chhattisgarh and ethers VS. Baiihath Mandei anti another). Thus, this petition is squareiy . ‘ - . covere b he judgmenr and erner da 15‘ of Ja.ua. , 2008 passed ir ‘ No 4542f”0 ijnath Manda! Vs. The State of Chhattis arh & ethe s and omer come ed matters as submMed by £eamed caunse: appearing far the pames. W§th :he consvrt sf the w, :es. this petiiim § cca em y éispo-sed cf in *he samv mm“ -e the offce vf the Advocate Generat ts directed to sentt the case to the Cemmtttee, within a petiod of 15 d'me fwm the date et teeeiet at a c Vv of thie er e" Thereafter, a-the r~ vommtttee shat; ll tseue netlce to the etitiehet anti the efticete cencerneti wtthth a further perted ef 15 days The vemmttte an t! censtder ane‘ peas order, in aecerdahce Wtt" “I; after afierci.rg p per oppertunity ct hearihg to the petitioner The petrtiener amt tie effeer ncerhed may F! me additienai I- do meets, if neeeesary The re exercree rteiuding paymeht ef retrial dues h a. y te the petitione. b ampieted within a peried of four menths from the date er receipt at a cem' of t. .rs arde, The petitiener shaii supply extra copy ef the petitreu .e Iearned cemae. appearing for the respective re erde’rm, for onwar trahsmiseion te the acne eemmittee. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur