1 307.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.307 OF 2009 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.2974 OF 2009 Aarti Dineshkumar Yadav ...Applicant Versus Dineshkumar Shrinath Yadav ...Respondent ...... Ms.Prabha Badadare for Applicant. None for Respondent. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MARCH 11, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the respondent though served. The assertions made in the application have remained uncontroverted. The reasons mentioned in the application, in our opinion, is sufficient cause. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) in the interest of justice even though the delay is stated to be of 1826 days. Appeal be registered and proceeded as per its turn. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.) 2 307.09