IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1207 of 2009 01. UPENDRA SAHNI, S/o Gulab Sahni 02. Gulab Sahni, S/o Late Lakhan Sahni 03. Ramo Devi, W/o Gulab Sahni All residents of village- Dhanga, P.S.- Arer, Distt.- Madhubani ….. Petitioners Versus 01. The STATE OF BIHAR 02. Sunita Devi, D/o Lachan Sahni Resident of village- Dhanga, P.S.- Arer, Distt.- Madhubani ….. Opposite Parties. ----------- 04 26.03.2010 Heard Smt. Namrata Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh for the opposite party no.2. After having heard Smt. Namrata Mishra for the petitioners and after having perused the complaint petition, it can not be said that no offence is constituted by the facts stated in the petition of complaint. Smt. Mishra attempted to impress upon this Court that the petitioners have a very strong defence that he was never married to the lady. It hardly requires to point out by reference to A.I.R. 1976 SC 1947 (Smt. Nagawwa Versus Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi and Others) that the perspective defence of the accused may not be a ground for quashing the prosecution. The petition is dismissed. P.K. (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)