IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 3426 of 2008 Date of decision:-30.4.2008. Darshan Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others. ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. P.P.S. Duggal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Brar, DAG, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioner who is a senior citizen of 72 years of age has approached this Court in the grouse that in spite of no FIR against the petitioner still the police was harrasing him. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner had got his statement recorded and even handed over a copy of the affidavit sworn by him. Learned counsel for the State points out that as there is no FIR against the petitioner, hence, petition deserves to be dismissed as pre-mature. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the age of the petitioner, his only prayer is that in case ultimately FIR is registered, he be given 3 days notice to enable him to avail of appropriate remedy. The same is not objected to by the counsel for the State. Accordingly it is directed that in case FIR is registered for the offence under investigation against the petitioner, he be given three days advance notice before arrest. The petition is disposed of accordingly. April 30, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE