IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50444 of 2008 RAM CHANDRA SAH @ RAMCHANDRA SAHU Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3/ 20.1.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner-informant has filed this application for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party no.2, Dr.Md.Afaque Ahmad Khan alias Md.Aftab Khan by this Court on 1.10.2008 passed in Cr.Misc.No.38994 of 2008 who is an accused of a case which has been registered for offence under Section 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering every aspect of the matters, the bail was granted to opposite party no.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by grant of bail and it has been submitted that the person who has been granted bail had not come with clean hands, so he should not have been granted bail. This is not a case in which the accused-opposite party no.2 is alleged to have made any attempt to tamper with the evidences. There is no such allegation against him. The cancellation of bail can be 2 made only in exceptional circumstances. The circumstances mentioned in this application for cancellation of bail are not the exceptional circumstances. If somebody tampers with the evidence or tries to defeat the ends of justice, then only, bail can be cancelled. Those are not the circumstances in this case. Considering all these, I am not inclined to interfere with the previous order granting bail to opposite party no.2. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)