1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2318 OF 2003 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s order appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. __________________________________________________________ None present for Petitioner. Ms. V.S. Mhaispurkar, AGP., for State. .. Coram: J.N. PATEL, J. Date : 24th July, 2006. P.C. . None present for Petitioner. The petition impugns the concurrent findings of the Small Causes Court, Pune and of the District Judge in appeal which relates to assessment made by the Municipal Corporation in respect of the premises in which the petitioner has her clinic. 2. This Court has examined the orders passed by the Trial Court and 2 find that the respondent Municipal Corporation was justified in assessing the property at the rate of Rs. 13,450/- by duly taking into consideration its valuation and said assessment was for the period 1.11.1992 to 31.3.1993 and 1.4.1993 to 31.3.1994. The respondent Municipal Corporation was justified in claiming municipal taxes for the said period in accordance with reassessment done. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit in the petiton. Same is dismissed. (J.N. Patel,J.) ..