IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT FRIDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2008 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 6729 of 2008(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. T.A.JABBAR,AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.ADBUL RAXAKK, JERZAN MANZIL, THALAYAZHAM P.O., VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. T.S.JAMAL, PARIMANATHU HOUSE KULASEKHARAMANGALAM P.O.,VAIKOM TALUK KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. P.M.ELIAS, PULLIYATTU HOUSE PAINGARAPPALLY P.O.,MULAMTHURUTHY , KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 6729 of 2008(A) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF SALE DEEDS DT.13.09.2007 VIDE NO.3116 OF 2006. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF SALE DEEDS DT.13.9.07 VIDE NO.3117 OF 2007. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROHIBITORY ORDER DT.6.2.08 PASSED UNDER SECTION 144 (1) Cr.P.C BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DT.23.12.1977 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.11.2.05 IN W.P(C).3003 OF 2005 OF THIS COURT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.9.3.06 IN W.P(C).5722 OF 2006 OF THIS COURT. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.22.2.08 VIDE NO.4055/07/A OF THE RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE R.BASANT, J. ---------------------- W.P.C.No.6729 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of June 2008 J U D G M E N T The learned Public Prosecutor submits that this writ petition has now become unnecessary and superfluous inasmuch as the impugned order, that is Ext.P2 order has lapsed, the same having not been renewed. The learned counsel for the petitioners also accepts the same; but the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners apprehend that similar orders may be passed by the Sub Divisional Officer as soon as this writ petition is disposed of. 2. I agree with the learned Public Prosecutor that it is not necessary to continue the adjudication in this matter as the order has worked itself out and does not remain in force now. 3. This writ petition is in these circumstances dismissed. Needless to say, if any further orders are issued, the right of the petitioners to approach this court to challenge the said order shall remain. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No. 2 W.P.C.No. 3 R.BASANT, J. CRL.M.CNo. ORDER 21ST DAY OF MAY2007