IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13409 of 2010 Decided on : 30.07.2010 Virsa Singh ... Petitioner versus State of Punjab & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. P.S.Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (1) In the instant petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to take appropriate action on the basis of the complaint dated 20.04.2009 (Annexure P-3). (2) The petitioner has made the said complaint against the revenue officials. It is claimed that an inquiry was held but no final action has been taken against the revenue official though they were found guilty. (3) The record also reveals that the petitioner has some property dispute. (4) In these circumstances, without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 that if any complaint made by the petitioner is pending consideration, the same may be disposed of as per law, preferably within a period of one month. (5) Disposed of. (6) Ordered accordingly. July 30, 2010 (SURYA KANT) sonia JUDGE