-fc HIGH COURTOF CiIHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W. P (C) No. 646 ot2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Rajendra Shankar Shukla, Advocate, s/o late Pt. Ramavatar Shukla, R/o 23/56, Malviya Road, Raipur (CG). Vs. 1 State -of Chhattisgarh through Special Secretary, Commerce and Industry Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G). 2 Registrar, Firms and Institutions, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G). 3. Kankubj 'Sabha, Registration No.34, dated 25.10.1961, Ashirwad Bhawan, Byran Bazar, Raipur (C.G). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: . Mr. G.S. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. K.R. Nair, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance copy. QRAL ORDER (11.02.2010) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Petitioner Rajendra Shankar Shukla has filed this petition for issuance of writ/direction to respondent no.2 to appoint a person of his office to monitor the future election that may be held by respondent no.3 for the office bearers of the Society. -Mr. Agrawal submits that since many irregularities are cemmitted in the elections of the Societies, therefore in anticipation, such prayer has been made so that the elections are fairly conducted. / j 'ei. ^;^i 'i<!^ "SP •'•'s\ W.P.CCTNo. 646/2010 ^- On being pointedly asked froin learned Senior Counsel that whether there is any provision in the Act or Rules for appointment of a person like that, learned counsel could not point out any such provision. It is also noted that presently the elections have not been notified. In the above facts and circunistances of the case, I am not inclined to entertain this petition for grant of the aforesaid relief. The petition filed for the said relief is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed suminarily. -__ Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Rao