IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25512 of 2010 Between: Balda Mallaiah ..... Petitioner AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhongir, Nalgonda District & another. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri A. Rajashekar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25512 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 having entertained the appeal on 27.09.2010 filed against order dated 22.09.2010 of respondent No.2 passed under Section 6 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 has not been disposing of the stay application and the appeal. At the hearing Sri A. Rajashekar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that his client is the owner of the property in question and that he has constructed a residential house, wherein he is living. He further submitted that respondent No.1, having entertained the statutory appeal, ought to have granted stay and disposed of the appeal expeditiously and that on account of non- passing of orders on stay application, his client is facing threat of dispossession. After hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment), I am of the opinion that the interest of the petitioner requires to be safeguarded pending appeal. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 not to dispossess the petitioner till disposal of the appeal by respondent No.1. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.32588 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 08.10.2010 Note:- Issue CC today. (B/o) ES