IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 354 OF 2008 SHRI. ANTHONY M. R. J. MARTINS AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION THROUGH CHIEF DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. Da Costa Frias. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. Date:- 31st July, 2008 P.C. The learned Advocate for the petitioner on taking instructions from the petitioner stated that in view of what is stated in the affidavit in reply by the respondents and more particularly what has been stated in paragraph 8 thereof in relation to the agreement between the petitioner and the respondents to the effect that the petitioner's claim for dealership would be considered on priority basis in accordance with law in case the respondents decide to give regular dealership relating to the outlet in question which statement we accept and in pursuance thereto, the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition if need arises in the matter. The petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn with the said liberty. We make it clear that all the issues are kept and we have not expressed any opinion on any of the issues. The petition accordingly stands disposed. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. lh/.