.^s^^ ^<&3-'zs"" ^;<^ SIN6LEB»1€H IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ 'pses'1 ^s'" PETITIONER VERSUS W. P. {Cl N0. .3.'3 9-^ / 2010 Nagar Panchayat Churikala Through - Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat - Churikala, Distt. Korba-(C.G.) 1. ' Vandana Power Pvt.Ltd., Through : General Manager, Churikala, Distt. Korba-(C.G.) 2. The Sub Divisional Officer, Katghora, Distt. Korba-fC.G.) 3. The Tahsildar, Katghora, Distt. Korba-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (0 N0.3979 OF 2010 Nagar Panchayat, Churikala Versus Vandana Power Pvt. Ltd. & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Praful Bharat, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.1 Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER.(ORAL) (Passed on this 2nd day of.August, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that indisputably-necessary permission has been granted, thus, the impugned communication dated 7-7-2010 may not survive, however, since the permission is not granted by the proper authorities, if the effect is not given to the permission, the petitioner may be granted liberty to question the legality and validity of the same. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous reserving liberty to the petitioner, as aforestated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri iE £>!'"i>yCT"t't3^:Ttn'tBu>'r"'~-3:';-Wf— • "~TZS^_t'31—-'FVSw8!nTyt?4"'@.3?~