IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5527 of 2011. Decided on: 18th July, 2011. Sita Ram. …Petitioner. Vs. HPSEB and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) When the petitioner has only left around one and half years to retire, he is transferred from Bilaspur to Solan and thus aggrieved by the transfer order, he has filed the writ petition. He has pointed out among other grievances that his parents are aged about 90 and 95 years and that his transfer in mid-academic session will affect the educational prospects of the children. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the first respondent by way of an appropriate representation within a period of one week from today, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent in terms of the policy and appropriate action in accordance with law in the matter will be taken within another two weeks. As and when the petitioner is relieved, he may not be compelled to join the transferred 2 station and it will be open to him to avail leave of the kind due. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 18th July, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/pankaj) Judge.