IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2010 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7081 of 2010(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AMEER.V.V.,, PULLARUVEETTIL, ULLIYERY, P.O.KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE-673323. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHARAM.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. COMMANDANT, KAP 4TH BATTALIAN, MANGATTUPPARAMBU, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 7081 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was called for an interview for appointment to the post of Driver/Police Constable in the 4th Battalion of the Kerala Armed Police, as per Ext.P1 letter dated 27.1.2010 issued by the second respondent. The case of the petitioner is that based on the said interview, he was selected for appointment to the said post, but he was not deputed for training solely on account of the pendency of a criminal case, C.C. No.45 of 201, on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court II Perambra, under Sections 506(i) and 294(b) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The petitioner has now produced Ext.P6 along with I.A. No.3348 of 2010 which would reveal that the said criminal case, viz., C.C. No.45 of 2010 has been quashed by this Court as per order dated 5.3.2010 in Cr.M.C. No.757 of 2010. It is contended that in the light of Ext.P6, the respondents may be directed to send the petitioner for training based on the W.P.(C) NO. 7081/2010 2 selection conducted on 27.1.2010. 3. It is evident from Ext.P6 that C.C. No.45 of 2010 pending against the petitioner has been quashed by this Court. Therefore, that cannot be a reason for not sending the petitioner for training, if he has already been selected. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to the respondents to send the petitioner for training, in case he has already been selected pursuant to the interview conducted on 27.1.2010. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) sp/ W.P.(C) NO. 7081/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. W.P.(C) NO.7081/2010 JUDGMENT 12th March, 2010