% “E’Z/ 3mm 3ENcrG IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s) No. :Z (9‘99 /201o x 1.“ Kheek Ram Rafhor'e, S/o Shri PETITIONERS Malik Ram Ra‘rhore, aged abouT 6O years, Headmaster GOVT. Primary School, S‘ra‘rion Bha’rha, Baradwar, Block Sakfi, DisT’r. Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) \WAgéW 2. Mohan Lal Gond, S/o Hira Sai 60nd, aged about 60 years, Headmaster Govt. Primary PaTerapali Khurd, Block Sakfi DisTT. Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) 3/ SanaT Kumar Shrivas, s/o Baijnalh Prasad, aged abouT 58 years, Upper division Teacher, GOVT. Girls Middle chool, Lovsara, Block Sak‘ri, Disi'f. Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. Shcmkar Das Mahan’r, S/o Bhoklo Das, aged abou‘r 61 years, Headmaster, Primary School Amagorra, Sa‘kreli Khurd, Block Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) Govt. S RESPONDENTs WRIT PETITfORTUN-DER ARTICLE 226 OE THE CON 5. Ghasir'am S/o- Ramdayal Dewangan, aged abou‘r 61 years, headmas‘rer GovT. Primary Schoof' Nandour'kala, Block Saki-i, DisTT. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) VERSUS Dewangan, STITUTION OF INDIA. : I. S‘rafe of ChhaTTfégar‘h Through - The Secretary, Education Depar’rmenf, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur‘ (CG) 2/. msmcr Education Officer/ DisTT. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Block Educa‘rion Officer, Sakfi, Disf’r. Jangir—Champa (CE) 4. J Join‘r Direc’ror, Treasury, Account & Pension, Biiaspur, ‘Dis’n‘. Biiaspur (6.6.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7699 OF 2010 PETITIONERS Kheek Ram Rathore & Others Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. , Present :- Shri A.S. Rajput, Advocate forthe petitioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6th day of January, 201 1) 1. The petitioners were initialiy appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.100/— & Rs.150/—. After completion of the probation period, the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scale w ef the date of Initial appomtment The matter was taken / up to the Supreme Court in SpeCIal Leave Petition (CIVII) No 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also submits that this court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. State of Chhattisgarh & others [W.P. (S) No.4725/2096] by order w N date 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation d within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in turn, the concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. FP Gowri W