1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. V BAIL APPLICATION NO.3108/2007 Date : 25.07.2007 HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. D.K. Gaur for the applicant. Mr. Ashok Upadyay, Public Prosecutor for State. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. This is fifth bail application. On previous occasion, the bail application moved by the applicant was rejected. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that cause of the death is not certain, therefore, no case is made out against the accused applicant. He further submits that proper direction be issued to the learned trial court to decide the case at an early date. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application 2 I have considered the submission made before me. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not feel inclined to extend benefit of bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. However, the learned trial court is expected to decide the case expeditiously. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij