IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 619 of 1995 Between: 1 Y.Ravinder Reddy, S/o.Bapu Reddy, R/o.6-165, Prashantinagar, Lingareddypalli, Medak District. 2 K.Gnaneshwar, S/o.Mahadev, R/o.6-13, Lingareddypalli, Medak District. 3 P.Malla Reddy, S/o.Chandra Reddy, R/o.6-164, Prashantinagar, Lingareddypalli, Medak District. 4 Y.Rajender Reddy, S/o.Bapu Reddy, R/o.6-165, Prashantinagar, Lingareddypalli, Medak District. 5 E.Srinivas, S/o.Ramuloo, R/o.13-1, Srinagar Colony, Lingareddypalli, Medak District. 6 J.Ramuloo, S/o.Yellaiah, R/o.3-76/2, Narsapur, Medak District. 7 G.Pochaiah, S/o.Balaiah, R/o.H.No.1-2, Narsapur, Medak District. 8 Beeram Balaiah, S/o.Ailaiah, R/o.1-27, Narsapur, Medak District. 9 Appa Rajaiah, S/o.Mallaiah, R/o.3-11, Narsapur, Medak District. 10 Belle Narsaiah, S/o.Bala Mallaiah, R/o.2-47, Narsapur, Medak District. .... PETITIONERS AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Secretary, Housing, Municipal Administration &Urban Development (i) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Medak District at Sanga Reddy. 3 Siddipet Municipality, at Siddipet, Medak District, through its Commissioner. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Lingareddypalli, Medak District, through its Executive Authority. 5 The Gram Panchayat, Narsapur, Medak District, through its Executive Authority. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, order or direction, declaring G.O.Ms.No. 16, Municipal Administration, Dt.7/01/1992 issued by the first respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. Counsel for Petitioners: MR. K.RAGHUVEER REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR HOUSING, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for Respondent No.3: MR. KRISHNA MURTHY, STANDING COUNSEL FOR MUNICIPALITIES Counsel for Respondents 4 & 5: None appeared The Court made the following ORDER: None appears for the petitioners. By lapse of time, the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ________________ N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 21st September, 2004. Ak/Ksr ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.The Secretary, Housing, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (i) Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2.The Collector, Medak District at Sanga Reddy. 3.The Commissioner, Siddipet Municipality, at Siddipet, Medak District. 4.The Executive Authority, The Gram Panchayat, Lingareddypalli, Medak District. 5.The Executive Authority, The Gram Panchayat, Narsapur, Medak District. 6.Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Housing, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 7.Two CD copies.